HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM III-G
~
CITY OF
COUIVC9L OPERATIONS
COMMITT,EE '
* WASHINGTON
, NBarch 8, 2011
, 4:00 PM .
ANNEX CONFERENCE .ROOM 1
1 EAST MAIN ST, 2ND FL
MINUTES
y1. CALL TO ORDER =
Chair Rich Wagner -cafled the meeting to order,at 4:00 p.m. in Annex
Conference Room 1; located on the second floor of the Annex located at
1 East Main Street in Auburn.
Members in attendance included Chair Rich Wagner, Vice Chair Sue
Singer, and Member Nancy Backus. Also in attendance were
Councilmember Virginia Haugen, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, and City
Clerk Danielle Daskam.
II. APPROVAL OF IVIINUTES
A. February 15, 2011
Motion by Vice Chair Singer, second by Member Backus fo
approve the February 15, 2011 minutes as distributed.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0. III. DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT COMMBTTEE MEMBERSHIP
Committee_ members discussed the membership on the Downtown
Redevelopment Committee. Vice Chair Singer suggested that the
responsibilities of the Downtown Redevelopment Committee could be
- accomplished by: the Planning and Community-Development Committee.
The.remaining Committee members recommended retaining the current
committee structure including the Downfown Redevelopment Committee.
After further discussion, Vice Chair Singer moved and Member Backus,
seconded to replace Sue Singer with Rich Wagner on the Downtown ~ Redevelopment Committee.
Page 1 _
Council Operabons Committee IlAacch 8, 2011
Motion carried_ unanimously. 3-0. Committee members also reviewed the responsibilities of the Council , committees.
Motion by Vice Chair Singer, second by Member Backus to move the
responsibility for., the Senior Center from the Municipal Services
Committee to the Planning and Communify Development Committee,
subject to agreement by the chair of the Planning and Community
Development Committee.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0.
IV. MAY 12T" CIT1( COUNCIL RETREAT PLANNING
Committee members reviewed potential discussion items for the Aubum
City Council retreat tentatively planned for Thursday, May 12, 2011.
The retreat theme will be transportation budget and vision, near term and20 yeac term, with several other topics discussed at intervals in order to
break up the intense transportation discussion.
Chair Wagner stated that the purpose of' meeting is to identify the
information that staff is 'expected to bring to- the retreat fo facilitate
subsfantive discussion of the bolded items below.
(1.1.1) Bonding capacity - General Obligation Bond for
Transportation
Member Backus suggested that. staff inform the; Council of the position of
the City, understanding the difference between bonding capacify versus
ability.to bond and pay for debt service.
Chair Wagner suggested discussion of other funding mechanisms
including: "
• Street Maintenance Utility • Transportation Benefit District • Reallocation of General Fund , .
• Grants
(1.1.2) Financing for the Save Our Streets (S03) program
Page 2
Council Operations Committee March 8, 2011
(1.1.3) ►mproved route from Lea Hill
(10/79, Confinued commitment to SOS Program)
(13/79, Pursue street bond (and other ways)to bring all arterials to at least 70% pavement
condition rafing)
(51/79, Fund and build infrastructure within the Green Zone)
(1.2.1) Downtown Transportation
(1.2.2) A/B Corridor (effecf on Aubum Avenue)
(3/79, Revitalize and redevelop Urban Center with extended areas) (29/79, Improve and. expand public parking opportunities)
(30/79, Continue efforts to.make Aubum's Ucban Center more pedestrian friendly)
(44/79, Complete "A%B" St corridor and develop adjacent areas)
(1.3.1) AMTRAK. Sounder, Metro and Pierce Transit
Member, Backus suggested including discussion of costs associated with
providing-these services. (1.3.2) Transit & Trails
Committee members agreed to change Transit and Trails to Non-
motorized Transportation.
(7R9, Continue advocacy for AMTRAK stop in Au6urn f
(25R9, Institute inner-city shuttle service
(48R, Build south end trail loop and horse trail)
(Not prioritized, Complete connections from Downtown to the Interurban and White River
Trails) -
(NoY prioritized, Complete Green River trail ) (1.4.1) Electric Car Charging Stations
Commitfee members. suggested deleting the electric car charging station
item.
(9.5.1) Additional~Transportation goa/s discussed af the Council _Vision 2030 Retreat October 2010
Committee members agreed to revise the list of additional transportation
: goals asfollows: - _ ,
(27/79, Encourage developmenfiof neighborhood west of C St. by extending sky bridge
across C St)
Page 3
Council Operations Committee March 8, 2011
(32/79, Complete SR 164 improvements)
(43/79, Development of airport area, inciuding runway extension, new commercial area,
and new entrances on "B" St and "D" St.)
,
~ _ , , 18
u n
JW79 , '
_(57f7g,
(59/79, Complete "I" St. corridor with appropriate buffers)
Committee members discussed the value of including the goals from the
Council Vision 2030 Retreat held in Ocfober 2010, priority ranked out of
79 goals. Committee members expressed concern that the rankings
should not influence discussion at the retreat.
Committee members discussed incorporating the Transportation
Improvement Program items in the retreat discussion with some threshold
for items to be discussed. Chair Wagner will discuss this issue further ,
with Public Works Director powdy. Committee members reviewed the "break° topics to be discussed at the
retreat:
(2;1.1): Economic Deve/opment
(2.2.1) Anima/ Services -
(2.3.1) Community Center - Veteran's Village (2.4.1) Diversity
Committee members anticipate the break items will be approximately 20-
30 minutes in length.
Vice Chair Singer explained that at the regional level, officials are
developing criteria for prioritization, e.g. points are eamed by how much
the project increases number of jobs, decreases congestion, etc.
Chair Wagner. suggested reviewing the Puget Sound , Regional Council.
and King County rating criteria and develop a system for use during fhe
retreat. ,
Page 4
Council Operations.Committee IlAarch 8, 2011
V. COUNCILMEWIBER HAUGEN'S. CONDUCT RELATIVE TO CITY
COUNCIL RULES OF PROCEDURE
(For clarifcation of these minutes, this item was discussed immediately
following Item III of these minutes.)
Chair Wagner referred to the revised discussion paper regarding
Councilmember Haugen's conduct relative to the City Council Rules of
Procedure and dated March 7, 2011 transmitted via agenda modification .
transmitted on March 7, 2011.
Committee members agreed that, according to the Council Rules of
, ---Procedure (RO), the Council Operations Committee's duties include:
The Council Operations Committee shall also evaluate and
recommend to the whole City Council any actions, responses or
sanctions for violations by Councilmembers of these Rules of
Procedure, which recommendations shall be considered, voted
and/or acted upon by the City Council in the normal,course.
And,
In cases of. alleged misconduct or violations of the City Council
Rules ofi Procedures (ROP), the person suspected ofi the alleged
misconduct or violation of the ROP shall be afforded the
opportunity to respond, which opportunity shall be given, with
advance notice, in an open rneeting of the Council Operations
Committee (COC) prior to the COC making any recommendations
_ regarding censure or reprimand or other disciplinary action.
Additionally, the Committee members noted that the Committee is not an
"ethics committee"' but rather it is a committee formed by the City Council
on February 2; 2004 in order to conducf City Council business in the most
efficient way possible. Nor do the Rules of Procedure address "ethical
behavior", they are simply procedural rules.
Chair Wagner read aloud references to the ROP sections thaf may have
been violated by Councilmember Haugen:
Section 2, Council Meetings:
Reference to RCW 42:30 regarding confidential executive sessions.
: Page 5
Council Oaerations Committee March 8. 2011 Section 63, Councilmembers, Obligation to the Public Agency:
Nofinrithstanding the right of Councilmembers to express their
independent opinions and exercise their fteedom of speech,
Councilmembers should act in a way that reflects positively on the
reputation of the_ City and of the community. Councilmembers shall
also interact with other members of the Cify Council and City.staff
in ways that promote effective local Govemment. -
Section 6.4, Councilmembers:
Councilmember are expected to participate in training offered by
individuals, agencies, entities and organizations, including but not
limited to the Association of Washington Cities and the State of
Washington, so as to afford the Councilmembers the opportunity to
better understand their roles as City Councilmembers.
Section 15.5, Council Relations With Staff:
Councilmember shall not attempt to change or interfere with the
operating rules and practices of any City department.
Section 17.4, Council Representation and Intemal Communication:
Councilmembers shall not knowingly communicate with an
. opposing party or with an opposing attomey in connection with any ;
pending or threatened litigation in which the City is a party or in
connection with any disputed claim involving the City without prior
approval of the City Attorney, unless the Councilmember is
individually a party to the litigation or is involved in the disputed
claim separate from the Councilmember's role as a City official:
The Committee's revised discussion paper further provided:
Primarily Councilmember Virginia Haugen's conduct relative to the Rules
of Procedure of the City Council may increase the risk of higher litigation
exposure and potential costs to the City for such things as:
(a) Litigation costs that may arise from her public statements that
. proposed sfreet designs may be.unsafe even though they have
been designed by City engineers using nationally recognized
safety criteria .
Page 6
Council Oaerations Committee March 8, 2011
Specific example of conduct: In 2010 Councilmember Haugen
communicated encouragingly with a citizen who had
complained to the City that the 8th & `R' Street NE project
would reduce the safety of her travel, implying that a lawsuit
might be fled. Councilmember Haugen stated that she has no knowledge that
~ anyone is suing the City because she discussed a City street
project. She contended that she did not discuss "safety" issues
with regard to City projects, but stafed concerns with :
inconvenience with the street plan for 8th and R Street NE:
Councilmember Haugen stated that she responded to an email
by a woman who she had not met before; Councilmember .
Haugen responded that she had some of the same concerns
expressed. Councilmember Haugen insisted that she did not
express,concems regarding safety but only concems regarding
inconvenience.
Committee members expressed concern of a Councilmember
communicating with anyone who may be threatening a
potential lawsuit.
Committee members discussed the email described by Councilmember Haugen. Councilmember Haugen requested a
copy of the email and her response, if available.
Committee members agreed that if reference to safety or
litigation is included in the subject email, this item will be
supported. If only the subject of inconvenience is contained in
the email, the item will be omitted.
Vice Chair Singer expressed concem with Councilmember
Haugen's contact with the Seattle Times regarding the Croskey
water leak appeal. City Attorney Heid stated that the City has
entered into a settlement agreement with the property. owner
and tenants and litigation is unlikely at this time.
Chair Wagner stated that he was not willing to include the
Croskey water leak appeal and Councilmember Haugen's ,
conduct surrounding the Croskey water leak appeal as part of
the alleged acts of misconduct of the ROP.
Page 7
Councal Operations Committee March 8. 2011
, (b) Diminished City negotiating position for the costs of contracts
that carry;the potential for litigation
Specific example of conduct: In 2010 Councilmember Haugen
. violated City. Council executive session . privileged
communications with regard to waste collection contract . negotiations in ways that were likely to interfere with or have
potential litigation implications.
In response, Councilmember Haugen stated that she was
approached approximately six or seven months ago by
someone who works in the solid waste industry who expcessed
concern that contracts were being negotiated. She stated that
she leamed of ongoing solid waste contract negotiations
through the Municipal Services Committee in 2009; the
information she received was not from executive session.
Councilmember Haugen stated that she has always believed
' that the City of Aubum should put the solid waste contracts out
for bid. Councilmember Haugen stated she was approached
by a representative of CleanScapes to whom she expressed
her belief that solid' waste contracts should be put out to bid.
Councilmember Haugen stated she did not divulge executive
session privileged information.
Chair Wagner stated that it appears that Councilmember
, Haugen may have inadvertently violated executive session
` privileged communications by having a conversation with a
representative of CleanScapes.
: Councilmember Haugen confirmed that , she sought out
information from the City of Kent regarding their solid waste
contract. The Commitfee agreed to keep the violation stated above,
inserting the word '"inatlvertently" before the word "violated" to
read: .
Specific ezample of conduct: In 2010 Councilmember Haugen
_ inadvertentlv violated City Council.executive session prnrileged
communications with regard to waste collection contract
_ negotiations in ways that were likely to interfere with or have .
_ potential. litigation implications.
Page 8
Council Operations Committee March 8. 2011
(c) Diminished City negotiating position for real estate acquisitions
Specific example of conduct: Councilmember Haugen
communicated with a property owner at Harvey & 8th Street NE
' • about City acquisition of right-of-way for south bound right
hand tum lane from 8th Street to Harvey Road.
Also, in 2010, Councilmember Haugen violated City Council
executive session privileged communication with regard to real
estate acquisition of the Marvel building by speaking with a
newspaper reporter about City plans.
Councilmember Haugen confirmed that she spoke to a
property owner who said that he was going to lose six parking
spaces due to the 8th Street NE project.
Vice Chair Singer stated that the potential violation of conduct
relating to the Marvel building hinges on whether the Council
voted on the purchase of the property the same night as the
executive session relating to the purchase.. The Committee
asked the City Attorney and City Clerk to investigate whether
an executiv.esession regarding the, purchase of tlie Marvel
building occurred the same evening as approval of the
purchase.
There was discussion regarding the partywall agreement related to the demolition of the Marvel building at 2 West Main
Street.
Chair Wagner as_ked that the Cify Attomey and City Clerk
investigate the 'sequence of executive sessions and the
approval of the partywall agreement.
(d) Diminished : City bargaining position for labor contracts
Specfic example of conduct: In 2010, according to Mayor Pete
Lewis, Councilmember Haugen spoke with various City labor
union representatives regarding wage and benefit negotiations,
- in violation of the Rules of Procedure and the City's labor
negotiation process, undermining the City's negotiation
position.. .
Page 9
Council Oaerations Committee March 8. 2011
Councilmember Haugen stated that she has a son-in-law that
works for the City's Maintenance and Operation Division. She .
stated that she has told her son-in-law to take his complaints to
City. Hall. Additionally, she spoke fo a Water Division
employee at a local restaurant where she told the employee to
take his complaints to a City Council meeting or write a letter to
the newspaper. Councilmember Haugen stated that she had
another encounter with finro maintenance workers in the
parking lot of the Main Street Market, where she sympathized
with their concerns, but encouraged them to take a public
stance.
Committee members coached Councilmember. Haugen that
she should not speak with the City's union employees in any
way that would imply support for#heir position.
Councilmember Haugen indicated there were emails befinreen
herself, and Mayor Lewis regarding Councilmember Haugen's
communications with union members,
Councilmember Haugen stated that she was approached by
four different union members regarding the City's refusal to
bargain in good faith with the union.
Committee members agreed to modify the example of conduct
as follows: Specific example of conduct: In 2010, according to Mayor Pete
Lewis, Councilmember Haugen spoke with vaFieUs-some City
labor union feqFes°^*^~ *ies-members who approached her
regarding . wage and benefit negotiations, in violation of the
Rules of Procedure and the City's labor negotiation process,
undermining the City's negotiation position. This mav have
been inadvertent.
(e) Interfering with developers' project plans
Specific examples of conduct: Councilmember Haugen
testified without Cify authorization at a March 3, 2010 City of
Kent Hearing Examiner hearing on the Verdana development,
where the City of Aubum was involved in a lawsuit with the
developers,. saying, according to the Kent Reporter newspaper.
"This development will have a significant impact
Page 10
Council Operations Committee March 8. 2011
environmentally,n potentially weakening the City's position in
the lawsuit.
Also, in 2010, according to Jeff Tate, City Development
Services Manager, he received a call from Satpal Sohal, who
has applied for permits to build a hotel in Auburn. Sohal said
that he had receiyed calls from several local hotel operators
who told him that Councilmember Haugen had called them to
encourage them to oppose his project.
Councilmember Haugen stated.that when she. spoKe before
the City of Kent Hearing Examiner, she identified herself as a
concerned citizen only. She also stated that she indicated at
the Kent Hearing Examiner hearing that she stated she was a
City Councilmember but was before the hearing examiner as a
citizen only.
Chair Wagner asked the City Attorney and City Clerk to
research the executive sessions held that may have related to
the Verdana/Kenf 160 suit so that the Committee may
determine if Councilmember Haugen's testimony occurred
before or after discussion in executive session.
Chair Wagner directed the Committee's attention to the second
example of Councilmember Haugen's conduct related to
developer's project plans. Councilmember Haugen stated that
she spoke with one motel owner last fall about concerns for
hotel/motel profits should another motel open in Auburn.
Councilmember Haugen understood that the permitting
process was already underway. Councilmember Haugen could
not recall if she encouraged opposition to the project.
After further discussion, the Committee agreed that the second
example of interFerence with developers' projects should be
changed to, read as follows:
Also, in 2010, according to Jeff Tate, City Development
. Services Manager, he received a call from Satpal Sohal, who
has applied. for permits to build a hotel in Aubum. Sohal said .
that ; he had received calls from several local hotel operators
who told him that Councilmember Haugen had called one of
them to encourage them to oppose his project. _
Page 11
Council Operations Committee March 8. 2011
The following actions of Councilmember Haugen were also . discussed:
Specific example of conduct: Councilmember Haugen sends many
emails to Mayor Lewis accusing and implying that the Mayor was
involved 'in illegaL collusion with private developers, where there
appears to be no basis for such accusations of implications.
Councilmember Haugen stated when she received emails from
Mayor Lewis that are offensive to her, she responds.
Councilmember Haugen urged the Committee to provide emails
proving her conduct.
Chair Wagner requested that Mayor Lewis and other Committee
members. forward any applicable emails to the City Clerk for
inclusion in the next Committee agenda packet.
Specific example of conduct: Councilmember Haugen has largely
ignored mentoring by Deputy Mayor Singer with regard to
improving her Councilmember skills through training opportunities.
Deputy Mayor Singer produced a copy of a note written by
Councilmember Haugen reading: "Did not, agree to become a
trained Councilmember." Councilmember Haugen concurred and read further: "Did not
agree to become a trained Councilmember and chose not be
completely silenced by our Rules of Procedure, Section 16.1.G.
Councilmember Haugen stated that she uses the Councilmember
Handbook published by the Association of Washington Cities.
Vice Chair Singer agreed to re-write the example prior to the next
Committee meeting.
Chair Wagner set the' next meeting of the Council Operations
Committee for March 29, 2011 at 3:30 p.m. The agenda packet will
be published one week before the meeting.
VI. ADJOURIVMENT .
There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m.
APPROVED THE DAY OF , 2011.
Page 12
Council Operations Committee IVlarch 8, 2011
Rich Wagner, Chair Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
.
~
Page 13 .