Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Modifications *CITY * WAS H I NGTON TO: - Members of the City Council Mayor Lewis Departmenf Directors 'FROM: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk SUBJECT: April 4, 2011 Agenda Modfication DATE: April 4, 2011 The.April 4, 2011, City Council meeting agenda published on Friday, April 1, 2011, is modified` as follows: VIII. ORDINANCES AND RE$OWTIONS B. Resoiutions The agenda modification transmits Councilmember Haugen's rebuttal statement to Resolution No. 4699: 2. Resolution No. 4699* (Wagner/Heid) A3.6 , _ A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Aubum, Washington, censuring Councilmember Virginia Haugen for failure: to comply with the requirements of the City Councit Rules of Procedure Virginia Haugen From: vrginia Haugen Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 3:37 AM To: Vrginia Haugen Subject: Allegations #1. You have quoted a newspaper. Do you have recordings of what I said at hearings. I attended several hearings in Kent and spoke to several issues. Do you have transcripts: of 'my testimony and the date of an executive session at which I was informed of a lawsuit over a projecf a called Verdana. The Verdana lawsuit had nothing to do with anything me or the people I know talked about at those hearings. Any information used for my testimony at those hearings was taken from handouts given me by the City of Kent. #2. I spoke with one Motel operator about a permit for a new motel in Auburn because I suspected other motel owners in Auburn did not know a new motel might be built at the exit off Hi Way #18. I was correct. The woman I talked to did not know it. I have no idea what she did with the information I gave her. #3. I replied to an e-mail about ffth and. R St NE. Indicated I had concerns about heavy traffic. She mentioned the city's concern for safety. At a March 22nd P/Works meeting Pablo said "we haven't had a lot of accidents out . there'. My concern is elimination of left hand turns. , #4. I repeatedly told city employees unhappy with union contracts they should speak out pu6licly because there wasn't anything I could do for them. One of our union contracts is so complicated I'm still not sure I understand it. #5. Pete. Lewis and Shelley Coleman, started forcing a no bid idea for garbage collection when Gene Cerino was Chairman of Municipal services and I was on his committee. I was approached about our garbage contracts long before it was discussed in executive session. I have no idea where tliey got there information and don't care. I have always been open about my support for a bid pr.ocess when we award city contracts. My conversation with a person from Kent was about cost savings and the open bid process. Dan Heid told us that no matter which direction we went we touid be sued. The threat of litigation was never about what I said to anyone about garbage pick-up in Auburn. #6. If the people who ele¢ted me wanted trained council members I would not be here. I attended an emergency management class and was told I didn't pass but was never told how I scored. The instructor rushed us through so-Pete.could use the chamber room for an annexation celebration. The Boeing Company trained me in First Aid Small Fire Control CPR and Evacuation Procedure. My city issue emergency kit is beside my back door my own'is under my bed and I have extra lights and a water supply in the basement. I know which of my neighbours will need help and when we had a strong earthquake I had sense enough to assess my own situation -first and stay put so if we had . damage in Auburn I would not be in the way..I began my term by attending regional meetings and events but soon realised we were doing little to conserve water were mowing down trees for asphalt and houses and to many people were eating way to many meals at the expense of taxpayers. I don't need training to know that when you let cops do 'off-duty' in City of Auburn uniforms you better cover yourselves with a written contract. #7. People all over town knew about how upset some of the M St and Harvey Road folks were over the city not showing right of way boundaries. A project manager told me they weren`t marking ROWs because they didn't want to get neighbours `in an uproar". The guy who lost parking spaces was furious. I have no idea what he got for his ROW or what he wanted. People who lose.land to capital,projects are often angry and•expect to be well compensated for their land. Whatever deal the city made with some guy over his parking lot did not hinge on any conversation I had with anyone. #8. I spoke to Robert Whale about the Marvel property.at 12:02 on a Tuesday morning because Pete-lewis told him we•were not going to take action after executIve session the night before. Robert Whale wanted a story and I gave him one. I begah my tenure on this council with every intention of working with others to insure that our entire population is served. I don`t believe that any one of us are crooks but I do 1 - e , disagree witfi.much of what has happened at'the hands of this administrafiion and I am not shy about saying.so. I hope when the three of you are finished wasting my time and yours we can go to work to fix some of*the problems we really have. Virginia Haugen , • „ ~ ~ z CITY OF ~ 4 * . WASHINGTON' TO: Members of the City Council Mayor Lewis Department Directors FROM: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk SUBJECT: April 4, 2011 Agenda Modification DATE: April 4, 2011 The April 4, 2011, City Council meeting agenda published on Friday, April 1, . 2011, is modified as follows: VIII. ORDINAFICES AND'RESOLUTIONS A. Ordinances The agenda modfication transmits a correction to the agenda bill for Ordinance No. 6358: 3. OrcDinance No. 6358* (Norman/Snyder) A3.6 PLT08-0008 An Ordinance of the City Council of the -City of Aubum, Washington, approving the fnal plat of Kendall Ridge ~k. ~ . , cnar oF iVlemorandum WASHINGTON - ` To: Aubum City Councif From: Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager CC• Mayor Lewis Kevin Snyder, AICP, :Planning and Development Director Dennis Dowdy, PE, Public Worics Director Date: April 4, 2011 Re: Ordinance No. 6358 = Kendall Ridge Final Plat; Modification to Agenda Bill Staff proposed a revision to Note 23 to require the school, impact fees be paid at building issuance pursuant to Aubum City Code 19.02.070 rather than 'h paid to King County at final plat approval and'/2 paid at building issuance. The City Council recently passed an ordinance defemng impact fees for new residential development that includes school impact fees. In order for #his project to have the option of deferring impact fees staff _ recommends Note 23 reads as follows: School fees for Lots 1 through 106 inclusive within the City of Aubum are subject to Aubum City Code 19.02.070.. . Lot 90 contains an existing residence to remain and is therefore is exempt. Staff spoke with King County staff on April 4, 2011 and they did not have any objection to the proposed revision to Note 23. • Page 1 of 1 CIVBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED