HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM III KING CO SOLID WASTE
t 1
.~'.i t l~i1~s. :,~tk{ ~ i ~~f,~.~~ : ~ ~ ~ t.j~ . ( y
g i+ i. - ~ tf 3;~ E y i r~ ` i t.i i ~ ~t r• ~I f { r " ; ~ _ ~ ( ~ C ( ~ - t i ~ ~ I 3 ~ ~ t ~ i ~ ~ # I t ~ 4 ~ E t
j}l ?Ei.! ~4, .~i ? tl i~{ ~.~~i ! ~ t;,..• ~ '{i~: i~'~f~~,~` i..'i~ ~ ~i.~ I
~ '
. K Countyo ~a~ _ Sol` td~Witaste
S St"e.~n ~ ~ - . . .
3.- •:i ~_i. ;i~ r~ 4 a;7 1F~' i`~; r,ifk 'h 11
i,,`[
r ~
. fj Aub:54rnC=it~~kCounc~~lt~;
S , 7
~
!~a~~ " ~ 2901,
~ ~1r;
M~A4iI
i~{ ~~w
' ' .E ~ f F ~ ~ f ~ i; ~•i ` j .
~ I ` ~ f t e
1.. •t ~ ~ i i ~
~ ' ~ ~:3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s•3~} ~ ~ ~ ! I I i _ 3.~ i! ! ~ ~ i :
, _ , ~:i ,ti t'~:~ kt ~ :R,, 3•t ~ : ~ ; ~ I} ~~i ~
t ` • ~ t! ;f~E~~:~ ! ::i ~t!i~.~ ~ i,{ (~i. j '~s'E ~ t; i;Il~ ( ~I. 1 ! ~ .
t ' i } c s .
( , I
Department ~ ~ cil Resources and Par I ` .
~t~~ ~ j • i j ~ ; ~ ;iiijE # 3 ~ ~ ~ ~i ~
t ~
t
~ a ~ t ~ , f ~ ~ £ ~ ~ . k ~ ~ _ ~ , } • ~ ) King Co ,
~ .
• a e i v i s i o .
d Wst
si ~ s i~ r t~ r .t E: .id~ i±. ° ft ~ ~ " @ i 'iE ~7# 6 # y i . ~f§. ~ [{~;.54 1 E,#~ :I~i{ .i.F~ ~y s '+tl ~ i t
o
~ n the Beginning
Carton & Aorth .
H.H. Oleaon .
~ In the 1960s, a : ~1eh "state of the art" transfer ~ ~n
system began to replace
lake
fihe cornmunity landfrlls ; ~eh
Fa11 City
! Eastgate
Smaller loads of waste Nor~ ~A
are pu~t in~to larger ~ ~ ~'B .
~°ti°n. .
containers and taken to ~Tukwila
the Cedar Hills landfll ~ M6Nicken :eighte,
HON IA$8
for disposal ; n8shou ~e~ ..KING
g~t
_ couifff
~ There are fewer disposal ~ondoPit Anburn (Hotary Park)
sites in the county now ~M & R Street
Pyysllup/%it Corner
~°ifi°
than there were in the
1980s _
Rn,~molaY
The C0
Land
l
Regional ❑ Sofid waste generated in King County is disposed at the
Cedar Hills Regional `Landfill - the only active Iandfill
remaining in the county
❑ Cedar Hills was permitted in 1960 and- began receiving waste i n 1965
Li Siginificant capital upgrades were made beginning in the
1-980s as regulations changed
❑ I n 2010, the landfill received about 830,000 tons of sol~id waste
❑ The Iandfill has received national recognition :for its operations
❑ Landfi1l gas is soid to Bio Energy (Washi.ngton), LLC (BEW)
for conversion 'to natural gas which goes to Puget Sound
Energy's natural gas-fired power plants where it is used to
_generate electricity.
~4 . . .
Extenidng the Life of the Landfill
Ll Construction of a new disposal area will extend the Iife of
the landfill to about 2024
❑ The new area will be financed through contributions to the
landfill reserve fund
❑ The cost for construction and closure of the new area wiIl
add about $2 to the rate
Li The longer life of the landfill will defer the eventual transition
to some other more costly method(s) of disposal
, ' . '.*i k °i.. t' x ,
.
W _
:
-..v.. .,y' '7"' -t-.:-----• . . . . _ ' - _ - x ±a -e { a
_ „ -
_ . . .
...e .wc.. ' r 1 . . .a.V
, . -
:
<v : a ~ .
• . _ .._.,'mr..' . :.tj i.i ,
e
a{' C
~ y
. . .
A Coflaborafive'.Approach to
a
System Plannong
❑ In 2004, ordinance 14971 established a process for
collaborative participation by the cities in solid waste
planning
❑ The Metropolitan -Solid Waste IVlan:agement Advisory
Committee (MSWMAC) was formed aind has been meeting
since January 2005
La MSWMAC has 22 member cities represented by both
elected off.icials and staff
❑ Auburn has been active on MSWMAC
❑ MSWIVIAC and the division collaborated on the
d.evelopment of the Cornprehensive Solid V1/aste
Management Plan aind the adopted Solid Waste Transfer
and Waste Management Plan
The Transfer System
❑ An iterative process of analysis and reporting resueted in
the deveGoprnent and adoption of a major renovation
plan for the transfer system network
❑ The Plan- irecognazes- the need, to rnodernize the county's
transfer system
~ To increase capacity, for both now and the future
• To meet demands for recycling services and transfer of household
hazardous waste -
~ To increase operational efficiency
~ To create a sustainable system . ~ To ensure continued service
;
a . .
;,3
The Urban Transfer System
Shoreline Recycling & Transfer Station Complete - new recycling and transfer station
opened in February 2008
Bow Lake Transfer Station New facility under construction - Phase 1 to
open in 2012
Factoria Transfer Station Facility Master Plan at King County Council -
. rebuild facility at current location and on
adjacent property, do not build on
Eastgate property
Algona Transfer Station Siting for a new south station to begin in 2011
- close Algona and open new station in
2018
Houghton Transfer Station Siting for a new NE station to begin in 2011 -
close Houghton and open new station in
2018
Renton Transfer Station Close when transfer system upgrades are
complete (subject to further evaluation)
od0
~d Wast.e Rates
Fees have increased at less than the rate of inflation
$120.00
o
$115.00 ~
~.0~`Y '`0^• cb.
$110.00 -
. ~pry• r $1`08.00
$1'05.00
$100.00
~ti ~ $95
$95.00
$90:00 ~ •
$85.00
$80.00 .
0) O N M d' lo (D h o0 0) O e- N
0) O O O O O O O O O O ~
~ O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
-*-actual tipping fee -0-tipping;fee, if increased at rate of inflation*
Regional Solid Rates
Waste WA~Solid~ Waste Tipping Fees tne~t«~~ 2010 E:
, ~,.F-~-~~-z~~'~'- _..._------`z' -T-r--
San'luari , 1 ~ . } ( i '
Whettom
franchUe hautx a
s FrMNa~ Huhor - Sus ~i~, $100 / $7s Pend i,
Oreille I
Okanogen r Perry • j'~ z ~ , ~ ~ ) i ~ Stevens I $91'+ .
skeste : S74 L 5 $134 S61 /$M,+ L , I.
Ses+
Clallam~~ 3iwhomish ~ We , \-I
; $120:10/$16915204.65 i J $105+ ) Chelan
;
R _ ~ , . i ~
,effe.son: f
~
A _ - - - - - - - - oo~as
SI10+ $58 L I yncoln Spbkane
-Ki ans
$95 + L / ~ I $g5 + i $98 4 U i
~f
ury or seaak
Grays ~ Mason glae _ ~
Harbor ~$80.40+,,(~ GreM k:
$85.25# ~ Ly -..i Kktltes ~ $28.80 /537,76+/$122
Pleroe $gf,.B4+ I Atlama I
. ` 1N4Jtman' I
Thunton M CltVOf Tawme l $70 ~
( ~ S
nwawn.;suo
~
7
eacrec ( lewis
t~; 1 ~ $98:28 i FrenMln Getfleldl
$82+ ( Yaklma
$izs $ss S36.35
<< ~
$32 Ll ~
- ~ t ~ ColumbiaL.
i
- ~I Cowllu= Benton ~Walla Walla ~ $94 ~ i Asodn `
~d 61.30 l I r l$37.66 l
zF<7 : ~ ~ ' $37:30 L ~ Skamanla + ~ $
~ ;'Wahklakum Rlehland-$49.L:
~
5150- - - - - - - - - - - - - 5140 Plon-Rtchland $73, .7 7
Kltekltat'
~
Clerk I ~ $241. . ~ ~ $79.35+ 1
f. y f I . - .1/11MU11c~N5dWVYaftlllMflllwbltblarotM4lWwR~
r~
- ~c ~~r~?~ WUsteOdoef~~att4~drudeYatarMUfeluu19.6%
ItadWa =urAV
etdfef~to110%tl~dWhMu+atuof8d%
.1,4rFdnNfihldekpumco"i~. -
_ ,
L L 0 L0~ B Y °s•n.mra..twan.hgo wvaaun.nN.~ena.mwi~+w~
Wa,tiep geEc~i,~ 5~slbdmicatsa.kca laoevt4 -.Wdr
. _ . . . _ . - . . , o _.m . . . o :
• a
-Othc~ c~~ Serv.o
ces
❑ Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
o King County is 'responsible for producing the plan for the unincorporated
area and 37 cities
0 Coordinated regional plan
o Collaborafiive planning process
❑ Waste prevention and recycling
, * Grants
* EcoConsumer
o Green building events, training, and tours
* Green schools program -
❑ Construction and d'emolition debris
0 Construction waste management technical assistance .
o Consfruction waste diversion information
❑ Illegal dumping invesfigation and clean up
0 Junk vehicles
~ Dump site clean up vouchers
Illegal dumping hofiline :
, ,
Sofild'Waste ~ Agreemen-ts
❑ The current Interlocal Agreements (ILAS-) between 37 =
cities and King County w.ill expire in 2428
❑ To protect system ratepayers, ensuring adequate
revenue to repay bonds is critical - all bonds rnust be
repaid before the expiration of the ILAs
~ Shorter bonds that are repaid by 2028 - .
or
~ Longer I LAs and bonds of greater length
~
, .
Looking Forward .
❑ Life of the Cedar Hills landfillextended to -at least 2024 ❑ ImpleMenting the transfer system plan - a new south county station
❑ New Comprehensive Solid V1laste IVlanagement Plan
❑ New solid waste rate in 2012
❑ Interlocal agreement discussions -
❑ Ongoing, collabora#ive relationship
#