Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutITEM III KING CO SOLID WASTE t 1 .~'.i t l~i1~s. :,~tk{ ~ i ~~f,~.~~ : ~ ~ ~ t.j~ . ( y g i+ i. - ~ tf 3;~ E y i r~ ` i t.i i ~ ~t r• ~I f { r " ; ~ _ ~ ( ~ C ( ~ - t i ~ ~ I 3 ~ ~ t ~ i ~ ~ # I t ~ 4 ~ E t j}l ?Ei.! ~4, .~i ? tl i~{ ~.~~i ! ~ t;,..• ~ '{i~: i~'~f~~,~` i..'i~ ~ ~i.~ I ~ ' . K Countyo ~a~ _ Sol` td~Witaste S St"e.~n ~ ~ - . . . 3.- •:i ~_i. ;i~ r~ 4 a;7 1F~' i`~; r,ifk 'h 11 i,,`[ r ~ . fj Aub:54rnC=it~~kCounc~~lt~; S , 7 ~ !~a~~ " ~ 2901, ~ ~1r; M~A4iI i~{ ~~w ' ' .E ~ f F ~ ~ f ~ i; ~•i ` j . ~ I ` ~ f t e 1.. •t ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ' ~ ~:3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s•3~} ~ ~ ~ ! I I i _ 3.~ i! ! ~ ~ i : , _ , ~:i ,ti t'~:~ kt ~ :R,, 3•t ~ : ~ ; ~ I} ~~i ~ t ` • ~ t! ;f~E~~:~ ! ::i ~t!i~.~ ~ i,{ (~i. j '~s'E ~ t; i;Il~ ( ~I. 1 ! ~ . t ' i } c s . ( , I Department ~ ~ cil Resources and Par I ` . ~t~~ ~ j • i j ~ ; ~ ;iiijE # 3 ~ ~ ~ ~i ~ t ~ t ~ a ~ t ~ , f ~ ~ £ ~ ~ . k ~ ~ _ ~ , } • ~ ) King Co , ~ . • a e i v i s i o . d Wst si ~ s i~ r t~ r .t E: .id~ i±. ° ft ~ ~ " @ i 'iE ~7# 6 # y i . ~f§. ~ [{~;.54 1 E,#~ :I~i{ .i.F~ ~y s '+tl ~ i t o ~ n the Beginning Carton & Aorth . H.H. Oleaon . ~ In the 1960s, a : ~1eh "state of the art" transfer ~ ~n system began to replace lake fihe cornmunity landfrlls ; ~eh Fa11 City ! Eastgate Smaller loads of waste Nor~ ~A are pu~t in~to larger ~ ~ ~'B . ~°ti°n. . containers and taken to ~Tukwila the Cedar Hills landfll ~ M6Nicken :eighte, HON IA$8 for disposal ; n8shou ~e~ ..KING g~t _ couifff ~ There are fewer disposal ~ondoPit Anburn (Hotary Park) sites in the county now ~M & R Street Pyysllup/%it Corner ~°ifi° than there were in the 1980s _ Rn,~molaY The C0 Land l Regional ❑ Sofid waste generated in King County is disposed at the Cedar Hills Regional `Landfill - the only active Iandfill remaining in the county ❑ Cedar Hills was permitted in 1960 and- began receiving waste i n 1965 Li Siginificant capital upgrades were made beginning in the 1-980s as regulations changed ❑ I n 2010, the landfill received about 830,000 tons of sol~id waste ❑ The Iandfill has received national recognition :for its operations ❑ Landfi1l gas is soid to Bio Energy (Washi.ngton), LLC (BEW) for conversion 'to natural gas which goes to Puget Sound Energy's natural gas-fired power plants where it is used to _generate electricity. ~4 . . . Extenidng the Life of the Landfill Ll Construction of a new disposal area will extend the Iife of the landfill to about 2024 ❑ The new area will be financed through contributions to the landfill reserve fund ❑ The cost for construction and closure of the new area wiIl add about $2 to the rate Li The longer life of the landfill will defer the eventual transition to some other more costly method(s) of disposal , ' . '.*i k °i.. t' x , . W _ : -..v.. .,y' '7"' -t-.:-----• . . . . _ ' - _ - x ±a -e { a _ „ - _ . . . ...e .wc.. ' r 1 . . .a.V , . - : <v : a ~ . • . _ .._.,'mr..' . :.tj i.i , e a{' C ~ y . . . A Coflaborafive'.Approach to a System Plannong ❑ In 2004, ordinance 14971 established a process for collaborative participation by the cities in solid waste planning ❑ The Metropolitan -Solid Waste IVlan:agement Advisory Committee (MSWMAC) was formed aind has been meeting since January 2005 La MSWMAC has 22 member cities represented by both elected off.icials and staff ❑ Auburn has been active on MSWMAC ❑ MSWIVIAC and the division collaborated on the d.evelopment of the Cornprehensive Solid V1/aste Management Plan aind the adopted Solid Waste Transfer and Waste Management Plan The Transfer System ❑ An iterative process of analysis and reporting resueted in the deveGoprnent and adoption of a major renovation plan for the transfer system network ❑ The Plan- irecognazes- the need, to rnodernize the county's transfer system ~ To increase capacity, for both now and the future • To meet demands for recycling services and transfer of household hazardous waste - ~ To increase operational efficiency ~ To create a sustainable system . ~ To ensure continued service ; a . . ;,3 The Urban Transfer System Shoreline Recycling & Transfer Station Complete - new recycling and transfer station opened in February 2008 Bow Lake Transfer Station New facility under construction - Phase 1 to open in 2012 Factoria Transfer Station Facility Master Plan at King County Council - . rebuild facility at current location and on adjacent property, do not build on Eastgate property Algona Transfer Station Siting for a new south station to begin in 2011 - close Algona and open new station in 2018 Houghton Transfer Station Siting for a new NE station to begin in 2011 - close Houghton and open new station in 2018 Renton Transfer Station Close when transfer system upgrades are complete (subject to further evaluation) od0 ~d Wast.e Rates Fees have increased at less than the rate of inflation $120.00 o $115.00 ~ ~.0~`Y '`0^• cb. $110.00 - . ~pry• r $1`08.00 $1'05.00 $100.00 ~ti ~ $95 $95.00 $90:00 ~ • $85.00 $80.00 . 0) O N M d' lo (D h o0 0) O e- N 0) O O O O O O O O O O ~ ~ O O O O O O O O O O O ~ O N N N N N N N N N N N N N -*-actual tipping fee -0-tipping;fee, if increased at rate of inflation* Regional Solid Rates Waste WA~Solid~ Waste Tipping Fees tne~t«~~ 2010 E: , ~,.F-~-~~-z~~'~'- _..._------`z' -T-r-- San'luari , 1 ~ . } ( i ' Whettom franchUe hautx a s FrMNa~ Huhor - Sus ~i~, $100 / $7s Pend i, Oreille I Okanogen r Perry • j'~ z ~ , ~ ~ ) i ~ Stevens I $91'+ . skeste : S74 L 5 $134 S61 /$M,+ L , I. Ses+ Clallam~~ 3iwhomish ~ We , \-I ; $120:10/$16915204.65 i J $105+ ) Chelan ; R _ ~ , . i ~ ,effe.son: f ~ A _ - - - - - - - - oo~as SI10+ $58 L I yncoln Spbkane -Ki ans $95 + L / ~ I $g5 + i $98 4 U i ~f ury or seaak Grays ~ Mason glae _ ~ Harbor ~$80.40+,,(~ GreM k: $85.25# ~ Ly -..i Kktltes ~ $28.80 /537,76+/$122 Pleroe $gf,.B4+ I Atlama I . ` 1N4Jtman' I Thunton M CltVOf Tawme l $70 ~ ( ~ S nwawn.;suo ~ 7 eacrec ( lewis t~; 1 ~ $98:28 i FrenMln Getfleldl $82+ ( Yaklma $izs $ss S36.35 << ~ $32 Ll ~ - ~ t ~ ColumbiaL. i - ~I Cowllu= Benton ~Walla Walla ~ $94 ~ i Asodn ` ~d 61.30 l I r l$37.66 l zF<7 : ~ ~ ' $37:30 L ~ Skamanla + ~ $ ~ ;'Wahklakum Rlehland-$49.L: ~ 5150- - - - - - - - - - - - - 5140 Plon-Rtchland $73, .7 7 Kltekltat' ~ Clerk I ~ $241. . ~ ~ $79.35+ 1 f. y f I . - .1/11MU11c~N5dWVYaftlllMflllwbltblarotM4lWwR~ r~ - ~c ~~r~?~ WUsteOdoef~~att4~drudeYatarMUfeluu19.6% ItadWa =urAV etdfef~to110%tl~dWhMu+atuof8d% .1,4rFdnNfihldekpumco"i~. - _ , L L 0 L0~ B Y °s•n.mra..twan.hgo wvaaun.nN.~ena.mwi~+w~ Wa,tiep geEc~i,~ 5~slbdmicatsa.kca laoevt4 -.Wdr . _ . . . _ . - . . , o _.m . . . o : • a -Othc~ c~~ Serv.o ces ❑ Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan o King County is 'responsible for producing the plan for the unincorporated area and 37 cities 0 Coordinated regional plan o Collaborafiive planning process ❑ Waste prevention and recycling , * Grants * EcoConsumer o Green building events, training, and tours * Green schools program - ❑ Construction and d'emolition debris 0 Construction waste management technical assistance . o Consfruction waste diversion information ❑ Illegal dumping invesfigation and clean up 0 Junk vehicles ~ Dump site clean up vouchers Illegal dumping hofiline : , , Sofild'Waste ~ Agreemen-ts ❑ The current Interlocal Agreements (ILAS-) between 37 = cities and King County w.ill expire in 2428 ❑ To protect system ratepayers, ensuring adequate revenue to repay bonds is critical - all bonds rnust be repaid before the expiration of the ILAs ~ Shorter bonds that are repaid by 2028 - . or ~ Longer I LAs and bonds of greater length ~ , . Looking Forward . ❑ Life of the Cedar Hills landfillextended to -at least 2024 ❑ ImpleMenting the transfer system plan - a new south county station ❑ New Comprehensive Solid V1laste IVlanagement Plan ❑ New solid waste rate in 2012 ❑ Interlocal agreement discussions - ❑ Ongoing, collabora#ive relationship #