HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-19-2011 Agenda Packet
City Council Meeting
December 19, 2011 - 7:30 PM
Auburn City Hall
AGENDA
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Flag Salute
B.Roll Call
C.Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations
D.Agenda Modifications
II.CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A.Public Hearings
1. 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (Norman/Dowdy)
City Council conduct a public hearing to receive public comments and
suggestions with regard to the proposed2012-2017 Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP).
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council conduct a pulic hearing.)
(See Resolution No. 4770, Item IX.A, for further action on this item.)
B.Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City
Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form
provided.
C.Correspondence
There is no correspondence for Council review.
III.COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A.Municipal Services
1. December 12, 2011 Minutes* (Peloza)
B.Planning & Community Development
1. Draft December 12, 2011 Minutes* (Norman)
C.Public Works
1. December 5, 2011 Minutes* (Wagner)
D.Finance
1. December 5, 2011 Minutes* (Backus)
E.Les Gove Community Campus
F.Downtown Redevelopment
G.Council Operations Committee
IV.REPORTS
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated with
their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations.
A.From the Council
B.From the Mayor
V.CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed.
A. Minutes of the December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting*
B. Claims Vouchers (Backus/Coleman)
Claims check numbers 409584 through 410028 in the amount of $5,848,263.99
and dated December 19, 2011.
C. Payroll Vouchers (Backus/Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 532493 to 532550 in the amount of $798,180.83 and
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,216,196.81 for a grand total of
$2,014,377.64 for the pay period covering December 1, 2011 to December 14,
2011.
D. Annual On-Call Professional Service Agreements* (Wagner/Dowdy)
City Council approve new annual On-Call Professional Service Agreements for
2012.
E. Public Works Consultant Agreement AG-C-408* (Wagner/Dowdy)
City Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG-C-408
with Golder Associated Inc. for engineering services for Project No. CP1107,
Fulmer Wellfield Improvements
F. Public Works Project No. CP1117* (Wagner/Dowdy)
City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Small Works Contract No. 11-19
in the amount of $45,697.85 and accept construction of Project No. CP1117, 2011
Arterial & Collector Crack Seal Project
G. Final Pay Estimate Contract 10-24 Project CP0922* (Norman/Snyder)
City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 11 to Contract 10-24 in the amount of
$2,737.50 for a total contract price of $1,536,843.37 with R.L. Alia Company and
accept construction of Project No. CP0922 City Hall Plaza Improvements.
H. VADIS Service Agreement AG-S-053* (Peloza/Coleman)
City Council approve 2012 Service Agreement No. AG-S-053 with Vadis.
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council approve the Consent Agenda.)
VI.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There is no unfinished business.
VII.NEW BUSINESS
There is no new business.
VIII.ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 6387* (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Chapter 18.50 of the Auburn City Code relating to landscaping and screening and
adding a new section 18.04.318 to Chapter 18.04 of the Auburn City Code relating
to definitions
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6387.)
B. Ordinance No. 6388* (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Chapter 18.52 of the Auburn City Code relating to off-street parking and loading
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6388.)
C. Ordinance No. 6389* (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Chapter 18.70 of the Auburn City Code relating to Variance, Special Exceptions,
and Administrative Appeals by adding a new section on Administrative Variances.
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6389.)
D. Ordinance No. 6390* (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, creating a
new Chapter 18.55 to the Auburn City Code relating to outdoor lighting
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6390.)
E. Ordinance No. 6393* (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Sections 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 and 19.02.140 of the Auburn City Code
relating to school impact fees
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6393.)
F. Ordinance No. 6395* (Peloza/Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, correcting
language in Ordinance No. 6367, amending Section 8.08.180A of the Auburn City
code relating to residential garbage and recycling service charges
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No.
6395.)
IX.RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4770* (Norman/Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving the
2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program of the City of Auburn pursuant to
R.C.W. Chapter 35.77 of the laws of the State of Washington
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4770.)
B. Resolution No. 4780* (Peloza/Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to execute a Services Contract with the Seattle-King County Department of
Public Health for reimbursement of funds related to 2012 Local Hazardous Waste
Management Program activities
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4780.)
C. Resolution No. 4781* (Peloza/Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the
acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount of One Hundred Twelve
Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Two Dollars ($112,772.00), and authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Interlocal Agreement between King County
and the City of Auburn to accept said funds for implementation of the 2012-2013
Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Program
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4781.)
D. Resolution No. 4782* (Wagner/Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending the
City of Auburn Fee Schedule relating to fees charged by the Public Works
Department
(ACTION REQUESTED: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4782.)
X.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for
review at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council conduct a public hearing to receive public comments and suggestions with
regard to the proposed 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Background Summary:
Pursuant to RCW 35.77.010 the City of Auburn is required to annually prepare and
adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for each ensuing six
calendar years. The TIP is the detailed programming document for transportation
improvements over a six year period. The plan is intended to ensure that the City will
have available advance plans as a guide in carrying out a coordinated street
construction program.
The City Council is required to conduct a public hearing to review the work accomplished
under the six-year Transportation Improvement Program, and to adopt a revised and
extended plan.
The date of the public hearing was set by Resolution No. 4769 on November 28, 2011.
O4.9.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:PH.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDPH.1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
December 12, 2011 Minutes
Date:
December 13, 2011
Department:
Police
Attachments:
Minutes December 12, 2011
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
For information only.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:MS.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDMS.1
Municipal Services Committee
December 12, 2011 - 3:00 PM
City Hall Conference Room 3
MINUTES
DRAFT
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
Chair Peloza called the meeting to order at 3 p.m. in Conference Room 3 on the second floor of
City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Auburn WA. Members present: Chair Bill Peloza, Vice Chair Sue
Singer, Member John Partridge. Staff present: Mayor Peter Lewis, Chief of Police Bob
Lee, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Solid Waste & Recycling Coordinator Joan Nelson,
Police Secretary/Scribe Kathy Emmert. Others present: Councilmembers elect Largo Wales,
Wayne Osborne, John Holman, Auburn Reporter representative Robert Whale, Cynthia Schmidt
and her grandson Gage Bailey a Cub Scout, Troop 711, working on a merit badge.
B. Announcements
C. Agenda Modifications
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes November 28, 2011 Meeting
Vice Chair Sue Singer moved to accept the Minutes as presented. Member Partridge seconded.
Chair Peloza concurred. MOTION CARRIED: 3-0
III. ACTION
A. Ordinance No. 6395 (Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
correcting language in Ordinance No. 6367, amending Section 8.08.180A of
the Auburn City code relating to residential garbage and recycling service
charges
Vice Chair Singer moved for accept Ordinance No. 6395 and forward to the full Council for action.
Member Partridge seconded. Chair Peloza concurred. MOTION CARRIED: 3-0
B. Resolution No. 4780 (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor to execute a Services Contract with the Seattle-King
County Department of Public Health for reimbursement of funds related to
2012 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program activities
Vice Chair Singer moved for accept Resolution No. 4780 and forward to the full Council for action.
Member Partridge seconded. Chair Peloza concurred. MOTION CARRIED: 3-0
Page 1 of 2
MS.1
C. Resolution No. 4781 (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the acceptance and appropriation of grant funds in the amount
of One Hundred Twelve Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Two Dollars
($112,772.00), and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an
Interlocal Agreement between King County and the City of Auburn to accept
said funds for implementation of the 2012-2013 Waste Reduction and
Recycling Grant Program
Vice Chair Singer moved for accept Resolution No. 4781 and forward to the full Council for action.
Member Partridge seconded. Chair Peloza concurred. MOTION CARRIED: 3-0
D. VADIS Service Agreement AG-S-053 (Coleman)
Vice Chair Singer moved for accept The VADIS Service Agreement and forward to the full Council
for action. Member Partridge seconded. Chair Peloza concurred. MOTION CARRIED: 3-0
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Matrix
The Matrix is amended as follows:
Item 29P - Status is amended to reflect the Consultant report will be reviewed at the January 9,
2012 meeting.
Item 30P- New item added - Street Median Maintenance with Director Heineman as the Lead and
a review date of January 23, 2012.
V. ADJOURNMENT
Prior to adjourning Chair Peloza expressed his thanks and appreciation to Vice Chair Sue Singer and
Member John Partridge for their contributions to the Municipal Services Committee in 2011.
The meeting adjourned at 3:19 p.m.The next Municipal Services Meeting will be January 9, 2012 at 3
p.m.
Signed this _____ day of January, 2012
________________________________ ________________________________
Bill Peloza, Chair Kathy Emmert, Police Secretary/Scribe
Page 2 of 2
MS.1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Draft December 12, 2011 Minutes
Date:
December 13, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
PCDC Minutes 12.12.11
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development
Councilmember:Norman Staff:
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:PCD.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDPCD.1
Planning and Community
Development
December 12, 2011 - 5:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
B. Announcements
C. Agenda Modifications
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - November 28, 2011 (Snyder)
Minutes from the November 28, 2011 Planning and Community
Development Committee Meeting.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
III. ACTION
A. Resolution No. 4770 (Hankins)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Approving the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program of the City
of Auburn Pursuant to R.C.W. Chapter 35.77 of the Laws of the State of
Washington
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Transportation Planner Hankins explained that there were some changes
made from comments from the Public Works Committee. The Committee
concurred that they had no questions on the changes made.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
B. Ordinance No. 6388 Off-street parking and loading (Wagner)
Request for Committee to move Ordinance No. 6388, Auburn City Code
18.52 to full City Council on December 19, 2011.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Page 1 of 4
PCD.1
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
C. Ordinance No. 6390 Outdoor Lighting Standards (Wagner)
Request for Committee to move Ordinance No. 6390, Auburn City Code
18.55 to full City Council on December 19, 2011.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Chair Norman questioned the definition of Photometric Plan and whether or
not that is a publically known term. Planner Wagner explained that it is and
Director Snyder also added that there would be an explanation of the term
on any forms or applications that are to be filled out by applicants.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
D. Ordinance No. 6393 School Impact Fees (Dixon)
Request for Committee action to move Ordinance No. 6393, the proposed
2012 school impact fees for Auburn School District, Dieringer School
District, Federal Way School District and Kent School District to full City
Council on December 19, 2011.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
There was a discussion on the method of calculation for the school impact
fees for each district. Principal Planner Dixon explained the methodology
and the process by which the proposed fees are determined. Mayor Lewis
reiterated the fact that the Council is not obligated to approve the proposed
fee schedule.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Ordinance No. 6387 Landscaping and Screening (Wagner)
Review comments provided by the Public Works Committee on the
proposed amendments to Chapter 18.50.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Planner Wagner explained that there were two things that have been
changed since this item was taken through the Public Works Committee.
The first thing was the Maintenance Provisions which was clarified and the
second thing was the addition of language regarding retention of significant
trees. The committee discussed the language "shall" keep all significant
trees and it was decided to keep that language in the Ordinance.
There was discussion on section 18.050.070 and that it was confusing as to
the sequence of the items. It was suggested that the title to section B be
Page 2 of 4
PCD.1
changed to say "Initial Maintenace Period and Maintenance Assurance
Device". Discussion ensued on whether language was recognizable by the
general public.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
B. Ordinance No. 6389 Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative
Appeals (Wagner)
Review comments provided by the Public Works Committee on the
proposed amendments to Chapter 18.70.
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember
Partridge seconded to Approve
Planner Wagner explained the Ordinance. Discussion ensued on the
methodology of the 50% threshold. Staff explained the reasoning behind the
50%. There was also discussion on the radius notification requirements.
Staff explained that the requirement is 300 feet. Committee recommended
approval with these additions to the Ordinance.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
C. Director's Report (Snyder)
Director Snyder updated on the Committee on two grants that Planning and
Development is working on in conjunction with the Parks Dept. One is
through the American Beverage Association for $125,000 to fight childhood
obesity. The second is through Scotts Miracle Grow and is a $25,000 grant.
Director Snyder also mentioned a Reader's Digest competition to recieved a
grant to get a free city wide website update.
Director Snyder also mentioned that Planning and Development will be
assisting the Parks Department with the Parks Master Plan and Planner
Wagner will have the lead in that.
D. PCDC Status Matrix (Snyder)
There was discussion on the Phase II Code Update listed on Page 1 of the
Matrix. Director Snyder advised that this item will be brought before the
Committee in early February 2012.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning and Community
Development Committee, Chair Norman adjourned the meeting at 6:19 p.m.
APPROVED THIS ________ DAY OF _________________, 2011.
Page 3 of 4
PCD.1
______________________________
Lynn Norman - Chair
______________________________
Darcie Hanson - Administrative and Business Services Manager
Page 4 of 4
PCD.1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
December 5, 2011 Minutes
Date:
December 15, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
December 5, 2011 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:PW.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDPW.1
Public Works Committee
December 5, 2011 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in Conference
Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One East Main Street,
Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Rich Wagner and Vice-Chair Bill Peloza were present. Also
present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete B. Lewis, Councilmember-
Elect Wayne Osborne, Councilmember-Elect Largo Wales, Public Works
Director Dennis Dowdy, City Engineer/Assistant Director Dennis Selle,
Assistant City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Utilities Engineer Dan Repp, Traffic
Engineer Pablo Para Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Traffic Operations
Engineer Scott Nutter, Transportation/Grants Manager Chris Hankins, GIS
& Integration Manager Ashley Riggs, Network Communications Engineer
Colin Schmalz, Economic Development Planner Bill Thomas, Construction
Manager Larry Dahl, Resource Conservation Manager Deke Jones,
Planning Director Kevin Snyder, Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain,
Finance Director Shelley Coleman, and Public Works Secretary Jennifer
Rigsby.
Member Virginia Haugen arrived late.
Members of the public in attendance included: Michael Weinstein from
Urban Innovations Group.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no modifications to the agenda.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Wagner seconded to approve the Public Works Committee Meeting
minutes for date, November 21, 2011.
Page 1 of 10
PW.1
Motion Carried Unanimously. 2-0. Those absent: Haugen .
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. UIG Applied Energetics - Auburn Street Light Pilot Project (M. Weinstein)
Chairman Wagner introduced Michael Weinstein of Urban Innovations
Group (UIG).
Mr. Weinstein reported that UIG is currently working with multiple cities on
LED street lighting concepts. Mr. Weinstein provided some background
information about work that UIG is doing with the City of Mountlake Terrace.
Director Dowdy stated that he would be the point of contact with UIG if the
City of Auburn were to move forward with an LED street light pilot project, in
response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner.
Mr. Weinstein reviewed the expenses related to the City street lights,
including electricity payments. Mr. Weinstein stated that it is difficult to
calculate the cost for City staff, vehicles, and equipment for street light
maintenance. A further complication is that the charges for the City’s
electricity use comes from multiple “rate schedules.” Mr. Weinstein stated
that the charge for the lights owned and maintained by Puget Sound Energy
(PSE) is significantly higher than that for those owned and maintained by
the City.
Mr. Weinstein used an example from the City of Mountlake Terrace to show
how that city created an inventory of their street lights. Mr. Weinstein spoke
about the importance of determining what is included in a street light
system.
Chairman Wagner asked if a city can make the decision unilaterally to take
over all of the PSE owned street lights. Mr. Weinstein answered that the
city would have to negotiate with the power provider and/or current owner of
the lights. Chairman Wagner asked what success UIG has had with these
negotiations with other cities and the power provider. Mr. Weinstein stated
that they are in process.
Mr. Weinstein responded to questions asked by Vice-Chair Peloza
regarding how it is determined whether or not a street light is metered.
Director Dowdy stated that when Maintenance and Operations staff
complete work orders on a given day, they usually include multiple tasks, in
response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner regarding the City’s
ability to distinguish costs associated with street lighting from other work.
Mr. Weinstein discussed the improvements that have been made in LED
technology. Chairman Wagner verified that there are locations where the
Page 2 of 10
PW.1
Councilmembers and City staff could go to look at the LED street lights to
observe their performance.
Mr. Weinstein stated that UIG is working with other jurisdictions on in-house
systems that will identify street light outages and more effectively deal with
maintenance.
Mr. Weinstein reviewed the benefits from use of LED lights.
Mr. Weinstein and the Committee discussed how the pilot project could be
financed.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle explained that if the City owned lights
were converted to LED then there would be a potential savings however
just under half of the City’s street light system is owned by PSE. If PSE
does not convert their lights, the City will not see a cost savings for those
lights that the City pays for, which are owned by PSE. Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle pointed out that there is also no credit for the
installation of LED lights in the flat rate street lights. Assistant Director/City
Engineer Selle estimated that it would cost approximately $1,000.00 per
City-owned, metered, street light to convert them to LED for an estimated
total of $1.2M and that would probably yield approximately $16,000.00 in
power savings per year.
Mr. Weinstein responded that in Mountlake Terrace, UIG plans on working
with the power provider to re-lamp all of the street lights in the system and
then going on to different rate schedules based on the savings that the city
gets.
Mr. Weinstein answered questions asked by Chairman Wagner regarding
the negotiations with the power provider.
Director Dowdy addressed Vice-Chair Peloza questions regarding the
reluctance of PSE to convert the street lights they own to LED lights.
The Committee and staff discussed whether or not it would be worthwhile to
start calculations on benefits considering UTC regulations may change
soon to create a rate for LED lights.
The Committee discussed whether or not to recommend completing a street
light inventory. Director Dowdy pointed out that staff has been working with
PSE to complete a more accurate inventory of the City’s lighting
system. PSE is going to provide the City with their inventory maps and
Director Dowdy said that once staff evaluated the data, staff will be better
prepared to present the Committee with a better estimate of the funds
needed to complete the inventory and complete field work.
Page 3 of 10
PW.1
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle reviewed the work that has already
been completed in the inventory of the street light system.
Mr. Weinstein responded to a question asked by Member Haugen regarding
insects being less attracted to LED lights.
Chairman Wagner stated that he supports City staff completing an in-house
low level inventory, as explained by Director Dowdy and Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle, and PSE negotiation approach until the UTC
regulations are determined. The Committee agreed.
B. 2011 Phase II Code Update - Grouping 1 (Chamberlain)
Planning Commission Recommendation on Amendments to Title 18 -
Zoning, Related to Parking Regulations, Landscaping Regulations,
Administrative Variance Process, and Outdoor Lighting Standards.
The Committee and staff reviewed specific portions of the
recommendations.
Section 18.50.045 – Preservation of significant trees. Chairman Wagner
asked why the word “shall” was used in the first sentence of letter A instead
of “encourage” or “strive to.” Planning Manger Chamberlain answered that
the landscaping chapter is currently ambiguous as to keeping significant
trees so staff has structures the code that if a site can keep the significant
tree within the required perimeter landscaping, then they “shall” do so but if
it does not make sense for building construction then that significant tree
can come out.
Chairman Wagner stated that he is concerned with the wording due to the
possibility of failed root systems creating the need to remove significant
trees. Chairman Wagner suggested more work be done to make sure
people are not keeping trees that may be a danger. Planning Manager
Chamberlain will take the Committee’s comments back to the Planning and
Community Development Committee for consideration.
Planning Manager Chamberlain answered questions asked by Vice-Chair
Peloza regarding the relocation of the definitions that were located at the
beginning of the section.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if there are specific codes that address native
trees and sidewalks. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle answered that
the code is addressing private property and there are design standards for
trees in the public Right-of-Way.
Planning Manager Chamberlain responded to questions asked by Member
Haugen regarding the protection of trees during construction.
Planning Manager Chamberlain pointed out the section of the code that
Page 4 of 10
PW.1
addresses the use of draught resistant plants, in response to a question
asked by Member Haugen.
Table 18.52.020 – Off-Street Parking Requirements by Land Use. Chairman
Wagner asked if any consideration was given to cul-de-sacs as they relate
to when the code was being updated. Chamberlain answered that the table
deals with primarily commercial and/or industrial off-street parking and
residential is included to require two off street parking spaces on a single
family lot. Chairman Wagner questioned whether two parking spaces are
enough and asked that the Planning and Community Development
Committee consider his question.
Table 18.52.025 – Accessible Parking Spaces Required. Chairman Wagner
asked why the number of accessible parking spaces required is not related
to the use of the building or land use. Chamberlain answered that the table
comes from the International Building Code ADA Parking Standards.
Table 18.52.030 – Parking Quantity Restrictions. Planning Manager
Chamberlain answered a question asked by Chairman Wagner regarding
the requirements for Valet Service.
Section 18.52.050 – Parking Design, Development, and Maintenance
Standards. Chairman Wagner verified that there is a requirement for an
amount of concrete to be between the City Right-of-Way and the property
site, for properties with gravel driveways.
Planning Manager Chamberlain addressed questions asked Chairman
Wagner regarding off-street loading in the Downtown Area. Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle stated that in the Downtown Area on-street
loading conditions were being discussed. Chamberlain confirmed that it has
been discussed but nothing has been decided on.
Section 10.70.015 – Administrative Variance. Chairman Wagner suggested
more oversight be provided by the Council in cases of buildings begin
developed if the building is over six feet in height.
Chairman Wagner asked if decorative lighting was addressed in the
update. Planning Manager Chamberlain answered that decorative lighting
was not included. Chairman Wagner suggested the Planning Director
review any decorative lighting for appropriateness. Member Haugen agreed
with Chairman Wagner suggestion.
Mayor Lewis suggested encouraging decorative lighting while
acknowledging the need to respect the City’s carbon footprint.
Planning Manager Chamberlain answered questions asked by Chairman
Wagner regarding parking accesses.
Page 5 of 10
PW.1
The Committee and staff discussed the use of draught resistant plants and
native trees.
C. Ordinance No. 6381 (Mund)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Vacating Right-of-Way of 8th Street NE, West of A Street NE, within the
City of Auburn, Washington
There were no questions from the Committee.
The Committee supports introduction and adoption of Resolution No. 6381.
D. Resolution No. 4777 (Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Declaring Certain Items of Property as Surplus and Authorizing Their
Disposal
Director Dowdy reported that there were problems with the transmission
locking up on the grader and it had to be towed on and off of its trailer and
that is why staff is surplusing the item.
The Committee supports the adoption of Resolution No. 4777.
E. 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) (Para/Hankins)
Transportation Planner/Grants Manager Hankins explained that following
the discussion at the Committee meeting, the TIP will go back to the
Planning and Community Development Committee for action.
Chairman Wagner asked about why Lea Hill and Kersey Way are not on the
list of Projects of Regional Significance. Transportation Planner/Grants
Manager Hankins answered that the Projects of Regional Significance is
driven by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and their definitions
and include primarily multi-jurisdictional projects.
TIP #8 – A Street NW Phase 2 – Chairman Wagner suggested that staff
and the Committee look to fund the design of this project sooner, as well as
others, so the City is in a better position to apply for grants and loans to
fund the projects.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle verified that the goal is to develop a
good enough cost estimate so the City can go out and secure funding.
TIP #12 – Grade-Separation Crossing of BNSF Railyard – Traffic Engineer
Para stated that the $1M is the design money in response to a question
asked by Chairman Wagner. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle
commented on the expense of pre-design for the project. Mayor Lewis
suggested some exploratory work on the project be done.
Page 6 of 10
PW.1
TIP #33 – Traffic Calming Improvements – Vice-Chair Peloza asked if the
past, redflex revenues have been expended. Traffic Engineer Para stated
that they were.
TIP #65 – Lea Hill Segment 2 (104th Avenue SE to 112th Avenue SE) –
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if this project and TIP #66 included improvements
to Lea Hill Road and a bridge. Transportation Planner/Grants Manager
Hankins confirmed that to be correct. Chairman Wagner stated that if the
bond issue is passed, he will expect some pre-design work to be done on
both projects sooner then shown in the TIP.
TIP #26 – Metro Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttle –
Director Dowdy responded that the current contract ends in 2013 in
response to a question asked by Vice-Chair Peloza.
TIP #54 – Kersey Way Study – Traffic Engineer Para answered questions
asked by Chairman Wagner regarding the high level planning estimate for
the project.
TIP #29 – S 277th Wetland Mitigation – Assistant Director/City Engineer
Selle reviewed the scope of the project, in response to a question asked by
Vice-Chair Peloza.
TIP #46 – 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study – Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle stated that this study will look at the
alternatives to address the sight distance issues at the intersection.
Traffic Engineer Para explained that the Council Transportation Priority
Matrix includes the cost for engineering staff, in response to a question
asked by Chairman Wagner.
The Committee and staff reviewed the Financial Constraint & Fund Balance
Summary.
The Committee and staff reviewed the Program Project Summary as
follows:
Chairman Wagner suggested making TIP #4 a higher priority due to the
RPG Development Agreement.
Chairman Wagner stated that design money needs to be added to TIP #8
and move construction up to 2015.
Chairman Wagner asked that TIP #54 be moved into 2012 because the
Council gave a high priority to Kersey Way at the Council Retreat. Traffic
Engineer Para stated that the project has been reallocated to 2012 but this
Page 7 of 10
PW.1
change was not yet reflected in the Project Summary spreadsheet.
The Committee and Mayor Lewis discussed the City’s guardrail
projects. Traffic Engineer Para pointed out that there is no guardrail specific
project and that those projects fall under safety improvements. Staff will
bring their safety improvement recommendations to the Committee.
Chairman Wagner asked that it be indicated separately if the grants have
been applied for or will be applied for.
F. Resolution No. 4769 (Para/Hankins)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Setting
the Time and Date for A Public Hearing Before the City Council on the
2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program
The Committee supported the adoption of Resolution No. 4769.
G. Construction and Special Permit Fees (Gaub)
Assistant City Engineer Gaub distributed a hand out outlining the Permit
Fee Recommendations for 2012.
Director Dowdy explained that staff is recommending an adjustment to the
Construction Permit and Special Permit fees to help recapture the City’s
labor costs.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that there has not been an increase to
these permit fees since 2009.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub reviewed the calculations for Special Permit
fees with the Committee. Gaub explained that with the current ADA
requirements for slopes and grades of driveways there is more City
inspection time required, which is why the increase is significant for
residential driveways.
Chairman Wagner stated that he believes the fee increases are justified.
The Committee and staff discussed the importance of being able to
demonstrate that the fee increases are related to cost recovery.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub responded to questions asked by Member
Haugen regarding the increase of the fees in 2009.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the increases will be brought back
to the Committee on December 19, 2011 for action.
H. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub)
Item 13 – C207A – A Street NW Corridor – Phase 1: Chairman Wagner
Page 8 of 10
PW.1
asked about the status of the Post Office parking lot. Assistant City
Engineer Gaub answer that the fence along the west side of the Post Office
property has been removed by the Post Office. Assistant City Engineer
Gaub stated that the last information received by staff is that the lot
improvements will begin in March 2012.
Gaub stated that the portion of A Street NW between 3rd Street and 5th
Street will be constructed at the end of the month, but not open to through
traffic, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner.
Item 17 – C201A – M Street Underpass Project: Assistant City Engineer
Gaub stated that the pipe being installed on M Street currently is for high
pressure gas, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner. Gaub
explained that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) is relocating the high pressure
gas line so the line will be deep enough to be underneath the final roadway
of the underpass.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub answered questions asked by Member
Haugen regarding the depth of the pipeline.
Item 23 – CP1112 – 2011 Sidewalk Improvement: Assistant City Engineer
Gaub explained that there is not a lot of design work required to complete
this project but staff is spending time field locating the sections in need of
repair and calculating the quantities. Gaub stated that staff is also noting if
any of the wheelchair ramps need to be replaced adjacent to where
sidewalks will be replaced.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub said that construction will not start until late
February or early March 2012.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked when the Committee will be presented with a
project vicinity map. Gaub answered that the committee previously
approved the general locations for the project and a vicinity map will come
forward with the next project action.
Item 24 – CP1120 – Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools: Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle said that the City works with the school district
and citizens to help develop the list of improvements to apply for safe routes
to schools grants, in response to a question asked by Member
Haugen. Selle explained that in this case, the City partnered with the school
district and was successful is securing a grant to make improvements to the
Lea Hill route.
Item 29 – Auburn Way S and M Street SE Intersection
Improvements: Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle explained that there
are still no design and construction funds dedicated to this project.
Page 9 of 10
PW.1
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works Committee,
the meeting was adjourned at 5:25 p.m.
Approved this 19th day of December, 2011.
Page 10 of 10
PW.1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
December 5, 2011 Minutes
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
December 5, 2011 Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance
Councilmember:Backus Staff:
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:FN.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDFN.1
CITYOF_ =j_ Finance Committee
December 5, 2011 6:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 1
WASHINGTON AGENDA
I CALL TOORDER
A. Roll Call
B Announcements
C Agenda Modifications
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Claims Vouchers' (Coleman)
Claims check numbers 407350 through 407720 in the amount of
5,911 428.33 and dated December 5, 2011
B Payroll Vouchers (Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 532405 to532492 in the amount of $339,053.36 and
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of$1,267,875.46 for a grand
total of $1 606,928.82 for the payperiod covering November 17 2011 to
November 302011
C. November 21, 2011 Minutes*
III. ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 6378* (Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
amendingOrdinance No. 6339, the 2011-2012 Biennial Budget Ordinance
as amended by Ordinance No 6351 Ordinance No. 6352, Ordinance No.
6362 and Ordinance No. 6370 authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn
2011-2012 Budget as set forth in Schedule A
B. Ordinance No. 6379* (Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City ofAuburn, Washington,
amending Ordinance No 6339the 2011-2012 BiennialBudget Ordinance
as amended by Ordinance No. 6351 Ordinance No. 6352, Ordinance No.
6362, Ordinance No. 6370 and Ordinance No. 6378authorizingamendment
totheCity of Auburn 2011-2012 Budget as set forth in Schedule A
IV RESOLUTIONS
FN.1
A. Resolution No. 4771* (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor andCity Clerk to execute a contract with Washington2
Advocates, LLC for consultingservices
B. Resolution No. 4777* (Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, declaring
certain items of property as surplus and authorizing their disposal
V DISCUSSIONITEMS
A. Ordinance No. 6395* (Coleman)
AnOrdinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
correctinglanguage in Ordinance No. 6367 amending Section 8 08.180A of
the Auburn City code relating toresidential garbage and recycling service
charges
B. Resolution No. 4780* (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing theMayor to execute a Services Contract with theSeattle-King
County Department ofPublic Health for reimbursement of funds related to
2012 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program activities
C Resolution No. 4781* (Coleman)
A Resolution ofthe City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the acceptance and appropriation of grantfunds in the amount of
One Hundred Twelve Thousand SevenHundred Seventy Two Dollars
112,772.00), and authorizing theMayor andCity Clerk to execute an
Interlocal Agreement between King County and the City of Auburn toaccept
said funds for implementation of the2012-2013 Waste Reduction and
Recycling Grant Program
D VADIS Service Agreement AG-S-053* (Coleman)
VI. ADJOURNMENT
Agendasand minutes are available to the public atthe City Clerk's Office, on the City
website (http.//www.aubumwa.uov), and viaa-mail. Completeagenda packets are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office.
Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
FN.1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the December 5, 2011 Regular Meeting
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
December 5, 2011 Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve the December 5, 2011 minutes.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A
City Council Meeting
December 5, 2011 - 7:30 PM
Auburn City Hall
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
Mayor Peter B. Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and led those in
attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call
Councilmembers present: Rich Wagner, Sue Singer, Nancy Backus, Bill Peloza,
Lynn Norman, Virginia Haugen, and John Partridge.
Department Directors and staff members present: Assistant City Attorney Steve
Gross, Planning and Development Director Kevin Snyder, Public Works Director
Dennis Dowdy, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Principal Planner Jeff Dixon,
Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber,
Government Relations Manager Carolyn Robertson, Economic Development
Manager Doug Lein, Police Commander David Colglazier, and City Clerk Danielle
Daskam.
C. Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations
1. Presentation - "More Than You Imagined" Award
Mayor Lewis to present the "More Than You Imagined" Award to Bud
Larson for his years of service on the Auburn City Council and Law
Enforcement Officers and Fire Fighters (LEOFF) Board.
Mayor Lewis presented Clarence "Bud" Larson with the City's "More Than
You Imagined" award for his years of service to the Auburn community,
including his service on the City Council from 1975 to 1991, service as a
Councilmember on the Auburn Law Enforcement Officers and Fire
Fighters (LEOFF) Disability and Retirement Board from 1982-1983, and the
member-at-large position on the LEOFF Board from 1993-2011, for a
combined thirty-six years. Mayor Lewis thanked Mr. Larson for his hard work
and dedication to his community.
2. Proclamation - "Miss Auburn Scholarship Program Days"
Mayor Lewis to proclaim January 21, 2012 for the Teen Program and
February 3 and 5, 2012 as "Miss Auburn Scholarship Program Days" in
the City of Auburn.
Mayor Lewis read and presented a proclamation declaring January 21st for
Page 1 of 11
CA.A
the Teen Program and February 3rd and 5th, 2012, for the Miss Program as
"Miss Auburn Scholarship Program Days" in the city of Auburn. Mayor
Lewis, along with Councilmember Backus who serves as president of the
Miss Auburn Scholarship Program, introduced the Miss Auburn contestants
in attendance: Ashley Plemmons sponsored by Valley Bank, Presella Set
sponsored by HBT Insurance, Ashley Thordarson sponsored by Auburn
Noon Lions, Erin Fischer sponsored by Don Small & Sons, Tera Sabo
sponsored by Columbia Bank, Valerie Troccoli sponsored by Waste
Management, Salina Ellison sponsored by Kiwanis Club of the Valley,
Mackenzie Maynard sponsored by Flaming Geyser Gardens, Brianna
Hubbard sponsored by Sterling Savings, McKenzie Treece sponsored
by Molen Orthodontics, Hannah McFarlane sponsored by Oddfellows Pub,
Jessica Justice sponsored by Auburn Chevrolet, Alexandra Bonwell
sponsored by Scotty's General Construction, Inc., Denobia
Olegba sponsored by Cascade Eye and Skin Centers, Allison Amador
sponsored by Kiwanis Club of Auburn, Renelyn Cruz sponsored by Sound
Credit Union, Kyla Moen sponsored by Shred-it Western Washington,
Shelby Malama sponsored by Longhorn Barbeque, Courtney Kindell
sponsored by Jerry Honeysett, Hannah Woods sponsored by Select
Photography, Emily Minton sponsored by Lakeland Family Chiropractic,
Gabrielle Bonner sponsored by Children's Dance Studio.
Miss Auburn Outstanding Teen Program contestants in attendance included:
Alyssa Schnell, Lucky Backus, Bobbi Hanson, Georgia Riffle, Allison Arthur,
Cami Werden, Tarhata Garrison, and Sydney Hedrick.
3. Planning Commission Appointment
City Council to confirm the appointment of Mark Ramey to the Planning
Commission to fill an unexpired term expiring December 31, 2013
Deputy Mayor Singer moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to
confirm the appointment of Mark Ramey to the Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
4. Planning Commission Reappointment
City Council to confirm the reappointment of Judi Roland to the
Planning Commission for a three year term expiring December 31,
2014.
Deputy Mayor Singer moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to
confirm the reappointment of Judi Roland to the Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
D. Agenda Modifications
Agenda modifications included corrected claims voucher check numbers and total
amount and a revised Resolution No. 4779.
Page 2 of 11
CA.A
II. CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Hearings
1. Right-of-Way Vacation Application No. V3-11 (Wagner/Dowdy)
City Council to conduct a public hearing to receive public comments
and suggestions with regard to the proposed Right-of-Way Vacation
V3-11
Engineering Aide Amber Mund explained that Terry Home, Inc., has applied
for the vacation of approximately 4,000 square feet of right-of-way on
8th Street NE just west of A Street NE. The right-of-way was dedicated in
1947 through a plat dedication for street purposes. The applicant proposes
to incorporate the right-of-way into their development plans for their property
located just south of the right-of-way.
City Public Works staff recommends approval of the vacation with
easements reserved for City water facilities in the north eight feet of the right-
of-way and for existing Puget Sound Energy electric facilities.
Staff also recommends that compensation not be required as the right-of-
way was dedicated to the City at no cost.
The public benefits of the vacation include: decreased right-of-way
maintenance obligation and possible property tax revenues.
Mayor Lewis opened the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
Myla Montgomery, Terry Home, Inc., 31420 42nd Place SW, Federal Way,
WA
Ms. Montgomery spoke on behalf of the applicant, Terry Home, Inc. Terry
Home plans to open their second facility in Auburn on property adjacent to
the proposed vacated right-of-way. The facility in Auburn will serve twelve
young people who have survived traumatic brain injury; four of the beds will
be set aside for veterans.
Mayor Lewis closed the hearing at 8:02 p.m.
B. Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the
City Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in
on the form provided.
There was no audience participation.
C. Correspondence
There was no correspondence for Council review.
III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
Page 3 of 11
CA.A
A. Municipal Services
Chair Peloza reported the Municipal Services Committee met November 28,
2011. The Committee discussed Resolution No. 4775 updating the Employee
Deferred Compensation Plan, direct billing for garbage disposal, the Vadis Service
Agreement, golf course working capital, and the Committee project matrix. The
next regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee is scheduled for
December 12, 2011 at 3:00 p.m.
B. Planning & Community Development
Chair Norman reported the Planning and Community Development
Committee met November 28, 2011. The Committee reviewed Resolution
No. 4769, which sets the public hearing date on the 2012-2017 Transportation
Improvement Program, and Ordinance No. 6394 approving Comprehensive Plan
amendments. The Committee discussed Resolution No. 4771 approving a
contract with Washington2 Advocates, the 2012-2017 Transportation
Improvement Program, 2011 Phase II Code Update, Ordinance No. 6393 relating
to school impact fees, and building code and land use code issues relating to semi
truck trailers. The Committee also received an update on the Auburn
Environmental Park Boardwalk project. The next regular meeting of the Planning
and Community Development Committee is scheduled for December 12, 2011 at
5:30 p.m.
C. Public Works
Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee met this afternoon at 3:30.
The Committee received a presentation on street light conversion to LED from
Urban Innovation Group. The Committee also discussed Ordinance No. 6381
relating to right-of-way vacation, Resolution No. 4777 relating to surplus property,
the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Program, and a change in
construction and special permit fees. The next regular meeting of the Public
Works Committee is scheduled for December 19, 2011 at 3:30 p.m.
D. Finance
Chair Backus reported the Finance Committee met this evening at 6:00. The
Committee reviewed claims and payroll vouchers, Ordinance No. 6378 relating to
the 2011 Budget amendment, Ordinance No. 6379 relating to the mid-term budget
correction, Resolution No. 4771 approving a consulting services agreement with
Washington2 Advocates, and Resolution No. 4777 declaring a road
grader surplus. The Committee also discussed Ordinance No. 6395 related to
residential garbage and recycling services, Resolution No. 4780 approving a
contract with Seattle-King County Department of Public Health for the Local
Hazardous Waste Management Program, Resolution No. 4781 authorizing an
agreement with King County for the 2012-2013 Waste Reduction and Recycling
Grant Program, and the 2012 Vadis Service Agreement for litter removal. The
next regular meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled for December 19,
2011 at 5:00 p.m.
Page 4 of 11
CA.A
E. Les Gove Community Campus
The Les Gove Community Campus Committee has not met since the last Council
meeting.
F. Downtown Redevelopment
The Downtown Redevelopment Committee has not met since the last Council
meeting.
G. Council Operations Committee
Deputy Mayor Singer reported the Council Operations Committee met November
30, 2011 to discuss the 2012 Council Committee assignments.
IV. REPORTS
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items
associated with their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local
organizations.
A. From the Council
Mayor Lewis reported that at the last Puget Sound Regional Council meeting
Deputy Mayor Singer was recognized for her years of service on the Puget Sound
Regional Council (PSRC) Operations Board, Economic Development
Council, Executive Committee of the PSRC, and Chair of the PSRC. Deputy
Mayor Singer stated that last week she represented the City at a community
leaders dinner at the Auburn Regional Medical Center where the topic was
creating smoke free environments.
Councilmember Norman reported that she attended the Santa Parade and
the Red, White and Blue concert at the Performing Arts Center.
Councilmember Backus reported on her participation in the Valley Regional Fire
Authority Muscular Dystrophy Association fund raiser. Councilmember Backus
reminded that the Fire Fighters' Local 1352 will begin their Toys for Kids
Toy Collection this weekend. Councilmember Backus also reported on her
attendance at the King County Aerospace Alliance Partnership and the Santa
Parade.
Councilmember Peloza reported on his attendance at the King County Water
Pollution Abatement Committee meeting. Councilmember Peloza also briefly
spoke regarding King County Solid Waste Division's Cedar Hills Landfill Gas-to-
Energy Program.
Councilmember Haugen reported on her attendance at the Santa Parade and the
Red, White and Blue Concert.
B. From the Mayor
Page 5 of 11
CA.A
Mayor reported on Santa Parade, RW&B Concert,
V. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Payroll Vouchers (Backus/Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 532405 to 532492 in the amount of $339,053.36 and
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,267,875.46 for a grand total
of $1,606,928.82 for the pay period covering November 17, 2011 to November 30,
2011.
B. Minutes of the November 7, 2011 Regular Meeting
Deputy Mayor Singer moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to approve
the Consent Agenda.
Councilmember Haugen requested the removal of the claims vouchers from the
Consent Agenda.
MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, EXCEPTING THE CLAIMS
VOUCHERS, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
VI. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Claims Vouchers (Backus/Coleman)
Claims check numbers 409290 through 409583 in the amount of
$912,237.45 and dated December 5, 2011.
Deputy Mayor Singer moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to approve
the claims vouchers.
In response to questions from Councilmember Haugen, Parks, Arts and
Recreation Director Faber stated that the licensing fees for movies are integrated
in the cost of admissions. Additionally, outside sound technician services are
required for certain Auburn Avenue Theater shows.
MOTION CARRIED. 6-1. Councilmember Haugen voted no.
VII. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
VIII. ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 6378 (Backus/Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
amending Ordinance No. 6339, the 2011-2012 Biennial Budget Ordinance
as amended by Ordinance No. 6351, Ordinance No. 6352, Ordinance No.
6362 and Ordinance No. 6370 authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn
2011-2012 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A"
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Norman seconded
Page 6 of 11
CA.A
to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6378.
The Ordinance represents budget amendment no. 5, which makes the final
changes to the 2011 budget. The amendment includes revenues and grant
funding received and recognizes public employee pension contribution rate
adjustments.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
B. Ordinance No. 6379 (Backus/Coleman)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
amending Ordinance No. 6339, the 2011-2012 Biennial Budget Ordinance
as amended by Ordinance No. 6351, Ordinance No. 6352, Ordinance No.
6362, Ordinance No. 6370 and Ordinance No. 6378 authorizing amendment
to the City of Auburn 2011-2012 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A"
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Norman seconded
to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6379.
Ordinance No. 6379 provides for a mid-term correction of the 2011-2012 Biennial
Budget. It provides new beginning estimates for 2012 and incorporates any
amendments that occurred in 2011.
MOTION CARRIED. 6-1. Councilmember Haugen voted no.
C. Ordinance No. 6381 (Wagner/Dowdy)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Vacating Right-of-Way of 8th Street NE, West of A Street NE, within the
City of Auburn, Washington
Councilmember Wagner moved and Councilmember Peloza seconded to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6381.
The Ordinance vacates approximately 4,000 square feet of unused right-of-way.
MOTION CARIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
D. Ordinance No. 6394 (Norman/Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating
to planning; adopting Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments
pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 36.70A
Councilmember Norman moved and Councilmember Backus seconded
to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6394.
Ordinance No. 6394 includes two map amendments and ten policy text
amendments initiated by the City. The Ordinance also includes one privately-
initiated map amendment and a combined request for a map amendment and
associated privately-initiated policy/text amendment.
Page 7 of 11
CA.A
In response to a question from Councilmember Haugen, Director Snyder stated
that a Comprehensive Plan was required by the Growth Management Act in 1995;
however, there is evidence that the City had Comprehensive Plans as far back
as the early 1970's.
Councilmember Backus thanked Planning and Development Director Snyder and
the Planning staff for their work on the Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Councilmember Haugen expressed opposition to the amendments.
Councilmember Norman commended staff for their work on the proposed
Comprehensive Plan amendments. She stated that most of the amendments are
in response to federal, state and regional requirements and laws.
Councilmember Peloza commended the Planning and Development staff for their
work on the Comprehensive Plan amendments.
MOTION CARRIED. 6-1. Councilmember Haugen voted no.
IX. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4769 (Norman/Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, setting
the time and date for a public hearing before the City Council on the 2012-
2017 Transportation Improvement Program
Councilmember Norman moved and Councilmember Backus seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 4769.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
B. Resolution No. 4771 (Backus/Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a contract with
Washington2 Advocates, LLC, for consulting services
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Norman seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 4771.
Resolution No. 4771 represents a renewal of a contract with Washington2
Advocates LLC. Councilmember Backus stated that the firm has assisted the City
secure federal and state funds for City projects. Examples of successes in 2011
include defending the Public Works Trust Fund, working with State agencies to
reach an agreement on disposition of State property at Game Farm Park, working
with King County on the disposition of the historic post office that previously
housed the King County Health Department, working on development of a
regional firing range for area law enforcement agencies, securing funding for the
M Street SE Underpass Project, and working with the Federal Emergency
Page 8 of 11
CA.A
Management Agency on flooding issues.
Deputy Mayor Singer spoke against the Resolution. She stated that despite the
good work of past contracts, she believes the 2012 contract scope of services is
too weak and too expensive.
Councilmember Peloza spoke in favor of the Resolution and the need for
advocacy on behalf of the City to ensure the return of tax dollars to the City.
Councilmember Haugen concurred with Deputy Mayor Singer's comments.
Councilmember Partridge inquired whether the consultant could be hired on an as
needed basis. Mayor Lewis stated that the City could opt for a lesser contract and
have less standing in conflicting issues.
MOTION CARRIED. 5-2. Deputy Mayor Singer and Councilmember Haugen
voted no.
C. Resolution No. 4775 (Backus/Heineman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute and publish an amended
Deferred Compensation Plan for the City of Auburn that complies with the
new provisions of federal law that deal with government deferred
compensation plans
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Norman seconded to
introduce and adopt Resolution No. 4775.
Resolution No. 4775 amends the Employee Deferred Compensation Plan in
keeping with federal law.
In response to a question from Councilmember Haugen, Finance Director
Coleman explained that the Deferred Compensation Plan provides for a
mechanism for City employees to invest their own money in a deferred
compensation plan. The Plan must be in compliance with Internal Revenue
Service rules and regulations.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
D. Resolution No. 4777 (Backus/Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
declaring certain items of property as surplus and authorizing their disposal
Councilmember Backus moved and Councilmember Norman seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 4777.
Resolution No. 4777 declares a 1994 Champion road grader that has outlived its
useful life.
Page 9 of 11
CA.A
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 7-0.
E. Resolution No. 4779 (Wagner/Heid)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
repealing Resolution No. 4670 passed December 20, 2010 as amended by
Resolution No. 4692 passed March 21, 2011, as amended by Resolution
No. 4741 passed August 15, 2011, and designating the members, powers,
duties and meeting times and day of all standing committees of the City
Council of the City of Auburn
Councilmember Wagner moved and Councilmember Backus seconded to adopt
Resolution No. 4779 with the following changes: Finance Committee meeting time
shall be 5:30 p.m. on the first and third Mondays of the month and the
responsibility for the Senior Center shall move from the Municipal Services
Committee to the Les Gove Community Campus Committee.
Assistant City Attorney Gross reminded that City Council Rule 16.1(G)(1) prohibits
Councilmembers whose term of office will expire prior to or during the first meeting
of a new City Council and who have not been re-elected or appointed to another
term of office extending beyond the first meeting of a new City Council, shall not
be allowed to vote at Council meeting on the approval of the memberships of the
new committees.
Councilmember Wagner stated that allocating committee assignments was
more challenging this year than in the past due to three new Councilmembers
taking office. He noted that several areas of responsbility have been moved from
other committees to the Les Gove Community Campus Committee in order to
consolidate the activities at the Campus. The Les Gove Community Campus
Committee will meet on a regular basis rather than on an as-needed basis. The
Council Operations Committee is also scheduled to meet monthly. The Deputy
Mayor is designated to chair the Committee of the Whole and the Council
Operations Committee.
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember Backus seconded to amend
the resolution by removing "street median maintenance" from the scope of
authority for the Municipal Services Committee.
Councilmember Peloza stated that street median maintenance should be included
as part of the Committee's project matrix rather than listed as part of the
Committee's scope of authority.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4-0.
Councilmember Haugen expressed concern with the workload of the
Councilmembers and recommended eliminating the Les Gove Community
Campus Committee.
Page 10 of 11
CA.A
THE MAIN MOTION, AS AMENDED, CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 4-0.
X. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned at
8:50 p.m.
APPROVED THIS _____ DAY OF DECEMBER, 2011.
__________________________________ ________________________________
Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
Page 11 of 11
CA.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Claims Vouchers
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve the Claims Vouchers.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Payroll Vouchers
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve the payroll vouchers.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Annual On-Call Professional Service Agreements
Date:
December 9, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
New On-Call Consulting Contracts
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve new Annual On-Call Professional Service Agreements for 2012.
Background Summary:
Annual on-call agreements are used to supplement the City's staff resources or to perform
specialized services not available within the City. Having these resources available provides the
City with the flexibility to complete small tasks or projects, in an efficient and timely manner as
they are needed through out the year.
Each agreement is written to provide the total "Not to Exceed" amount for the year; however,
actual expenditures under each agreement are authorized by the City through specific Task
Orders. Each Task Order provides a specific Scope of Work, Schedule, and Budget for the work
to be completed by the consultant. In addition, the budget for each Task Order must be available
in the City's current budget either through professional services or associated capital project
budgets prior to approval of the Task Order.
Staff recently completed a selection process for three new types of consulting services to
supplement the typical on-call agreements previously seen by the Council.
The attached list of the new agreements for 2012 includes each agreement's "Not to Exceed"
amount as well as a brief description of the type of services.
A3.16.9
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.D
Pr
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
N
u
m
b
e
r
F
i
r
m
N
a
m
e
20
1
1
Ex
p
e
n
d
i
t
u
r
e
s
20
1
1
Re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
Ba
l
a
n
c
e
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
2
0
1
2
Am
e
n
d
m
e
n
t
Am
o
u
n
t
Pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
2
0
1
2
To
t
a
l
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
Am
o
u
n
t
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
/
S
i
g
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
Th
e
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
m
a
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
r
o
a
d
w
ay
a
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
si
g
n
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
.
Ne
w
P
a
r
a
m
e
t
r
i
x
N
/
A
N
/
A
N
/
A
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
Th
e
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
m
a
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
s
t
o
r
m
d
ra
i
n
,
sa
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
,
a
n
d
w
a
t
e
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
a
n
d
/
o
r
s
t
u
d
i
e
s
.
Ne
w
J
a
c
o
b
s
N/
A
N
/
A
N
/
A
$1
0
0
,
0
0
0
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
S
u
p
p
o
r
t
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
Th
e
c
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
m
a
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
t
o
s
u
p
p
o
r
t
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
a
pi
t
a
l
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
i
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
e
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
c
o
nt
r
a
c
t
ad
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ne
w
H
a
r
r
i
s
a
n
d
A
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
s
N
/
A
N
/
A
N
/
A
$5
0
,
0
0
0
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
Ne
w
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
i
n
g
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
Th
e
C
i
t
y
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
l
y
e
n
g
a
g
e
s
i
n
s
e
v
e
r
a
l
O
n
-
C
a
l
l
A
n
n
u
a
l
P
r
o
f
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
Se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
f
o
r
a
v
a
r
i
e
t
y
o
f
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
s
.
T
h
e
s
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
r
e
u
s
e
d
t
o
s
u
p
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
C
i
t
y
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
w
h
e
n
n
e
c
e
s
s
a
r
y
,
a
n
d
t
o
im
p
r
o
v
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
t
i
m
e
l
i
n
e
s
s
a
n
d
f
l
e
x
i
b
i
l
An
n
u
a
l
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
.
x
l
s
CA.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Consultant Agreement AG-C-408
Date:
December 13, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Consultant Scope Summary
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG-C-408
with Golder Associates Inc. for Engineering Services for Project No. CP1107, Fulmer
Wellfield Improvements.
Background Summary:
The purpose of the Fulmer Wellfield Improvements project is to construct improvements
to provide a reliable groundwater supply system comprised of existing wells, new wells
(as needed) and the existing corrosion control treatment facility configured to provide
operational flexibility and redundancy at Fulmer Field and to utilize the total water rights
from the existing wells.
Wells 2, 6 and 7 deliver water to the Fulmer Field Corrosion Control Facility. Well 2 has
a water right of 3.5 million gallons per day (mgd). Wells 6 and 7 each have a water right
of 5.0 mgd. Wells 2 and 6 have experienced a decline in production over the last 10
years and have been taken out of service due to pump failure.
The key element of the project is increasing water supply reliability and redundancy of
the Fulmer Field wells. The City considers using a group of wells as a possible option
where dispersed well points consisting of the existing wells plus new wells are controlled
using an intelligent monitoring and control system.
The City anticipates completing the project in three phases:
Phase 1A Investigation
Phase 1B Test Drilling & Alternatives Analysis
Phase 2 Design and Construction
It is anticipated that Phase 1A will be conducted from January to December 2012 and
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.E
Phase 1B from January to December 2013. An estimate of time to conduct Phase 2 of
the project will be determined during Phase 1B.
City staff has selected Golder Associates Inc. to provide engineering services for this
project, including investigation, alternatives analysis, design and construction services.
The Not-to-be-Exceeded cost for Phase 1A of the engineering services agreement is
$447,364.
A project budget contingency of $392,500 remains in the 430 (Water) fund for 2011. Due
to the nature of the anticipated work, estimate of total projects costs will be developed
during the Investigation and Test Drilling/Alternatives Analysis phases.
O4.11.1 CP1107, A3.16.9
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.E
H:\PROJ\CP1107-Fulmer Wellfield Improvements\Budget\BudgetStatusSheet.xls1 of 1
Project No: CP1107 Project Title:
Project Manager: Cynthia Lamothe
Initiation/Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: _________ Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: ________ Contract Award
Award Date: ___________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
430 Fund - Water 400,000800,0001,000,000 2,200,000
Total 400,000800,0001,000,0002,200,000
Activity Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
Phase 1A Design Engineering - City Costs 7,50042,500 50,000
Phase 1A Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 0447,364 447,364
Construction Estimate 00 0
Project Contingency (15%)00 0
Construction Engineering - City Costs 00 0
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 00 0
Total 7,500489,8640497,364
Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
*430 Funds Budgeted ( )(400,000)(800,000)(1,000,000)(2,200,000)
430 Funds Needed 7,500489,8640 497,364
*430 Fund Project Contingency ( )(392,500)(310,136)(1,000,000)(1,702,636)
430 Funds Required 000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
Costs for Phases 1B & 2 will be determined during Phase 1A.
430 Water Budget Status
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Fulmer Wellfield Improvements
Date: December 12, 2011
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
CA.E
CP1107 FULMER WELLFIELD IMPROVMENTS PROJECT
CONSULTANT SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY
PAGE 1 OF 2
CP1107 – Fulmer Wellfield Improvements Project
City of Auburn
Scope for Design, Survey, and Environmental Services - Summary
This Scope of Work summary is for the Fulmer Wellfield Improvements Project. This scope includes
preliminary engineering, hydrogeologic investigations and permitting.
Project Description
The City’s Fulmer Wellfield Improvements project will construct improvements to provide a reliable
groundwater supply system comprised of existing wells, new wells (as needed) and the existing
corrosion control treatment facility configured to provide operational flexibility and redundancy at
Fulmer Field and to utilize the total water rights from the existing wells. The project is located in the
vicinity of the existing Wells 2, 6, 7 and Fulmer Field Corrosion Control Treatment Facility.
Project Management
This task will be continuous throughout the project duration. It will include the work necessary to
manage the project, establish project-specific procedures, overall coordination and project progress
including work performed, schedule, and budget.
PHASE 1A
Desktop Review
The Consultant will obtain, review and analyze existing groundwater level and water quality data,
pumping rates and quantities, precipitation records and related facility as-builts needed to develop a
Hydrogeologic Investigation Program.
Data Collection
The Consultant will collect data from existing production and monitoring wells to evaluate current
well and hydrogeologic conditions and collect groundwater quality data for geochemical evaluations
and engineering design.
Water Quality
The Consultant will investigate the vertical distribution of groundwater quality in Wells 2 and 7 and
provide and assessment of the uncertainties in the existing information, how the data gaps would be
addressed and how the risks could be minimized in subsequent work.
Develop Hydrogeologic Program
The Consultant will integrate the data collected and evaluated under the previous tasks to identify
hydrogeological investigations needed to evaluate various site options. The Consultant will work with
the City to identify at a preliminary level several potential well/wellfield layouts, identifying the
locations for monitoring and test wells.
Total Phase 1A Consultant Services = $447,364
CA.E
CP1107 FULMER WELLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT
CONSULTANT SCOPE OF WORK SUMMARY
PAGE 2 OF 2
PHASE 1B
Drilling and Testing Program
The Consultant will prepare drilling and testing specifications and drill the test wells identified in
Phase 1A to collect information on the hydrogeologic units, aquifer hydraulic properties, and
groundwater/surface water quality. A detailed scope of the drilling and testing program will be
confirmed during Phase 1A.
Alternatives Analysis
The Consultant will conduct an engineering analysis to develop alternatives that meet the stated
project objective to devise a reliable groundwater supply system comprised of existing wells, new wells
(as needed), and a corrosion control treatment facility configured to provide operational flexibility and
redundancy and to utilize the total water rights from the existing wells.
Total Estimated Phase 1B Consultant Services = $1,227,287
Phase 1B is not being authorized at this time until Phase 1A work is complete.
CA.E
CA.E
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1117
Date:
December 13, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Final Pay Estimate
Vicinity Maps
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Small Works Contract No. 11-19 in the
amount of $45,697.85 and accept construction of Project No. CP1117, 2011 Arterial &
Collector Crack Seal Project.
Background Summary:
This project sealed cracks in the pavement on approximately 10 miles of arterial and
collector streets with rubberized asphalt to help preserve the existing pavement. The
attached maps show the specific streets that were crack sealed as part of this project.
A project budget contingency of $648 remains in 105 (Arterial and Collector Pavement
Preservation) Fund for this project.
O4.9.1 CP1117
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.F
Project No: CP1117 Project Title:
Project Manager: Seth Wickstrom
Initiation/Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: _July 18, 2011__________ Permission to Advertise
Solicitation Date: _August 9, 2011_______ Contract Award
Award Date: _August 24, 2011_________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
105 Fund - Arterial/Collector Pavement Preservation Fund 142,000142,000
Total 00142,0000142,000
ActivityPrior Years20102011 Future Years Total
Design Engineering 2,391 2,391
Construction Contract Bid 95,150 95,150
Authorized Contingency 37,812 37,812
Construction Engineering 6,000 6,000
Total 00141,3520141,352
Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
*105 Funds Budgeted ( )00(142,000)0(142,000)
105 Funds Needed 00141,3520141,352
*105 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(648)0(648)
105 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates money the City has available.
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
2011 Arterial & Collector Street Crack Seal Project
Date: July 9, 2011
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
105 Arterial/Collector Street Budget Status
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Page 1 of 1
CA.F
CA.F
CA.F
CA.F
CA.F
CA.F
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Final Pay Estimate Contract 10-24 Project CP0922
Date:
December 14, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Budget Status Sheet
Final Pay Estimate
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 11.
Background Summary:
See attached agenda bill.
O4.4.1 CP0922
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Downtown Redevelopment
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.G
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.G
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Project No. CP0922 – City Hall Plaza Improvements
Date: December 13, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Budget Status Sheet,
Final Pay Estimate, and Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
Administrative Recommendation: City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 11 to Contract No. 10-
24 in the amount of $2,737.50 for a total contract price of $1,536,843.37 with R.L. Alia Company and
accept construction of Project No. CP0922 City Hall Plaza Improvements.
Background Summary:
The City Council approved Resolution No. 3985 suppo rting the redevelopment of the City Hall Plaza into
a Town Center Plaza for the area around the intersection of West Main and Division Street, including the
City Hall Plaza, which will provide a public square with improved aesthetics for people to gather. The
Downtown Redevelopment Committee began working with John Nelson, Maul Foster Alongi, to develop a
conceptual plan for the City Hall Plaza renovation and approved the conceptual plan in March 2009.
The City has been working with MAKERS Architecture and Design on the detailed design for the City Hall
Plaza Improvement project including the expanded plaza. The project goals are to identify and fix the
drainage problem, remove and replace in the Committee approved pattern the lower level pavement,
open the view into the plaza, improve lighting, and create an inviting gathering space for the public
through artwork, furniture, and coffee kiosk. With the addition of the expanded plaza, the City will be
creating needed downtown open space for people to g ather for current and future residents of downtown.
The total costs for the City Hall Plaza Improvements, which includes Plaza Park, are $2,232,322. The
total amount budgeted from the Local Revitalization Funds is $2,322,649 which leaves $88,371
contingency in the 330 Local Revitalization Fund.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Downtown Public Works Human Resources
Redevelopment Comm. Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Item Number:
CA.G
Project No: CP0922 Project Title:
Project Manager: Elizabeth Chamberlain
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: May 3, 2010 Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: August 12, 2010 Contract Award
Award Date: September 7, 2010 Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
330 Fund - Local Revitalization Fund1,309,400724,749 2,034,149
328 Fund - Capital Improvement Fund288,500 288,500
Total 01,597,900724,74902,322,649
Activity Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 26,799957 27,756
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 427,49416,306 443,800
Construction Contract Bid 523,178743,735 1,266,913
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
City Hall Plaza Improvement
Date: December 7, 2011
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Change Order #1 90,896 90,896
Change Order #2 128,187 128,187
Change Order #3 35,613 35,613
Line Item Changes 15,235 15,235
Other - (Public Art Piece and site furnishing)68,00030,000 98,000
Construction Engineering - City Costs 66,27756,502 122,779
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 5,1000 5,100
Total 01,116,8481,117,43002,234,278
Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
*330 Funds Budgeted ( )0(1,597,900)(724,749)0 (2,322,649)
330 Funds Needed 01,116,8481,117,4300 2,234,278
*330 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (481,052)00(88,371)
330 Funds Required 00392,68100
Prior Years 20102011 Future Years Total
*328 Funds Budgeted ( )0(288,500)00 (288,500)
328 Funds Needed 0288,50000 288,500
*328 Fund Project Contingency ( )00000
328 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
328 Capital Improvement Fund Budget Status
330 Local Revitalization Fund Budget Status
http://auburnsp/depts/pdd/planning/Urban Center/Plaza and Linear Park/City Hall
Plaza/Budget/BudgetStatusSheet Final Pay Estimate.xls 1 of 1
CA.G
CA.G
CA.G
CA.G
CA.G
CI
T
Y
H
A
L
L
P
L
A
Z
A
V
I
C
I
N
I
T
Y
M
A
P
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
P
l
a
z
a
an
d
P
l
a
z
a
P
a
r
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
o
u
n
d
a
r
y
CA.G
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
VADIS Service Agreement AG-S-053
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
VADIS Service Agreement AG-S-053
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve 2012 Service Agreement No. AG-S-053 with Vadis.
Background Summary:
AG-S-053 is an annual service agreement between the City of Auburn and Vadis for a
12-month litter control program, beginning January 1, 2012, and ending December 31,
2012. This agreement also includes a recycling pickup program that runs from April to
September of each year. The City's current agreement with Vadis is valid through
December 31, 2011. The fees for services under this agreement shall not exceed
$145,278, which is the same fee that was paid for services in 2011. Vadis will perform
three extra supervisor days instead of four in order to provide services for the same cost
as in 2011.
Vadis is a non-profit corporation that develops employment opportunities for individuals
with disabilities. Each litter crew is made up of five specially challenged individuals and a
crew supervisor who collect trash and debris along City traveled ways. The contract has
been renewed annually since 1991.
Vadis Litter Crew Accomplishments
1) Annually, the litter crews remove 5,000 bags of litter from City traveled ways.
2) The litter crews maintain approximately 100 waste receptacles, 15 ash receptacles
(for cigarette butts), and 35 recycling receptacles in the City.
3) The recycling crew maintains 70 recycling containers at the City Parks.
4) The litter crews respond to calls on illegal dumping 2 - 3 times per week.
5) The litter crews also fills sandbags as needed.
A3.16.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.H
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:CA.H
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.H
CITY OF AUBURN
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
AG-S-053
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this_day of 2011
by and between the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington,
hereinafter referred to as 'City" and Vadis, 1701 Elm Street, Sumner WA 98390,
hereinafter referred to as the "Provider
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, theCity is engaged in or readying itself to be engaged in its litter control
and recyclingprogram and is in need of services of individuals, employees or firmsfor litter
control and recycling work; and,
WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Provider to providecertainservices in
connection with the City's work related to litter control and recycling; and,
WHEREAS, the Provider is qualified and able to provide services in connection with
the City's needs for the above-describedwork, and is willing and agreeable to provide
such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained.
NOW THEREFORE, the partiesheretoagree as follows.
1 Scope of Services
TheProvideragrees to perform in a good and professionalmanner the tasks
described on Exhibit A which is attached heretoand incorporated herein by this
reference. (The tasks described on Exhibit A shall be individually referred to as a
task, and collectively referred to as the 'services.') TheProvider shall perform the
services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this
Agreement and the performance thereof, to have entered into any partnership joint
venture, employment or other relationship with theCity
2. AdditionalServices
From time to time hereafter the parties hereto may agree to the performance by the
Provider of additionalservices withrespect torelated work or projects. Any such
agreement(s) shall be setforth in writing and shall be executed by the respective
parties prior tothe Provider's performance of the services there underexcept as may
be provided to the contrary in Section 3 of this Agreement. Upon proper completion
and execution of an Amendment (agreement for additionalservices), such
Amendment shall be incorporated into this Agreement and shall have the same force
and effect as if the terms of such Amendment were a part of this Agreement as
originally executed. The performance of services pursuant to an Amendment shall be
subject to the terms and conditionsof this Agreement except where the Amendment
provides to the contrary in which case the terms and conditions of anysuch
Amendment shall control. In all other respects, any Amendment shall supplement
and be construed in accordance with the terms and conditionsof this Agreement.
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 1 of 7
CA.H
3. Performance of Additional Services Prior to Execution of an Amendment
Theparties hereby agree that situations may arise in which servicesother than those
described on Exhibit A are desired by the City and the timeperiod for the
completion of such services makes the execution of Amendment impractical prior to
the commencement of the Provider's performance of the requested services. The
Provider hereby agrees that it shall perform such services uponthe written request of
an authorizedrepresentative of theCity pending executionof an Amendment, at a
rate ofcompensation tobe agreed to in connectiontherewith. The invoice procedure
for any such additional services shall be as described in Section 8 of this Agreement.
4 Provider's Representations
The Providerherebyrepresents and warrants that he has all necessary licenses and
certifications to perform the servicesprovided for herein, and is qualified to perform
such services.
5. Citv's Responsibilities
The City shalldo the following in a timely manner soas not to delay the services of
the Provider
a. Designate in writing a person toact as the City's representative with respect to the
services. The City's designee shall have complete authority to transmit
instructions, receiveinformation, interpret and define theCity's policies and
decisions withrespect to the services.
b. Furnish the Providerwith all information, criteria, objectives, schedules and
standardsfor the project and the services provided for herein.
c. Arrangefor access to the propertyor facilities as required for the Provider to
perform the services provided for herein.
Specificresponsibilitiesof theCity are setforth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto
and by thisreference made a part of this agreement.
6. Provider's Responsibilities
Specificresponsibilitiesof the Provider are set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached
hereto and by this reference made a part of this agreement.
7 Acceptable Standards
The Provider shall be responsible to provide, in connection withtheservices
contemplated in this Agreement, workproducts and servicesof a quality and
professionalstandardacceptable tothe City
8. Compensation
As compensation for the Provider's performance of the services provided for herein,
the City shall pay the Providerthefees and costs specified on Exhibit 'C" attached
hereto and made a part hereof(or as specified in an Amendment). The Provider shall
submit to the City an invoice or statement of time spent on tasks included in the
scope of work provided herein, and the City shall process the invoice or statement in
thenext billing/claimcycle followingreceipt of the invoice or statement, and shall
remit payment to the Provider thereafter in the normal course, subject to any
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 2 of 7
CA.H
conditions or provisions in this Agreement or Amendment. The Agreement number
must appear on all invoicessubmitted.
9 Time for Performance andTerm of Agreement
TheProvider shall not beginany workunder this Agreement until authorized in writing
by the City TheProvider shall perform the services provided for herein in
accordance withthe direction and scheduling provided on Exhibit A attached hereto
and incorporated herein by this reference, unless otherwise agreed to in writing by
the parties. The Term of this Agreement shall terminate on December 31 2012.
10. Ownership and Use of Documents
All documents, reports, memoranda, diagrams, sketches, plans, surveys, design
calculations, workingdrawings and any othermaterials created or otherwise prepared
by the Provider as part of his performance of this Agreement (the 'WorkProducts")
shallbe owned by and become the property of the City and may be used by the City
for any purposebeneficial to the City
11 RecordsInspection and Audit
All compensationpayments shall be subject to theadjustments for any amounts
found upon audit or otherwise to have been improperly invoiced, and all records and
books of accounts pertaining to any workperformed under this Agreement shall be
subject to inspection and audit by the City for a periodof up to three (3) years from
the final payment for work performedunder this Agreement.
12. Continuation of Performance
In the event that any dispute or conflict arisesbetweentheparties while this Contract
is in effect, the Provideragrees that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, the
Provider shall continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue work
toward successful completion of assignedduties and responsibilities.
13. Administration of Agreement
This Agreement shall be administered by Wayne Perrault, on behalf of the Provider
and by the Mayor of the City or designee, on behalf of the City Any written notices
required by the terms of this Agreement shall be served on or mailed to the following
addresses:
City of Auburn VADIS
Joan Nelson Mary Bushnell
Solid Waste & Recycling Coordinator Group Employment Manager
25 W Main St 1701 Elm Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Sumner WA 98390
Phone: 253-876-1900 Fax: 253-863-2040
E-mail: jenelson @auburnwa.gov E-mail: marvevadis.orq
14 Notices
All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement
shallbe in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person
ordeposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail,
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 3 of 7
CA.H
return receipt requested, and addressed, ifto a party of this Agreement, to the
address for the party setforth above.
Eitherparty may change his, her or its address by giving notice in writing, stating his,
her or its new address, to the other party pursuant to theprocedure setforth above.
15. Insurance
The Provider shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement
and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the
amounts described below Insurance is to be placedwith authorized insurers in
Washington State with a current A.M. Bestrating of not less than A-A/II. The
Provider shall furnish evidence, satisfactory to theCity of all such policies. During
the term hereof, the Provider shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the
followinginsurancepolicies:
a. Automobile Liability insurance, covering all owned, non-owned, hiredand leased
vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form
CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary
thepolicy shall be endorsed to provide contractualliability coverage. Provider
shall maintainautomobile insurancewith minimumcombinedsingle limit for bodily
injury and propertydamage of$1 000,000 per accident.
b. Commercial GeneralLiability insurance shall be written on ISO occurrence form
CG 00 01 and shall cover liabilityarising from premises, operations, independent
contractors, products-completedoperations, stop gap liability personal injury and
advertising injury and liability assumedunder an insured contract. The
Commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the
Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 11 85. There shallbe no
endorsement or modification of the Commercial GeneralLiabilityinsurance for
liabilityarisingfrom explosion, collapse or undergroundproperty damage. The
City shall be named as an insuredunder the Contractor's Commercial General
Liability insurance policywith respect to the workperformed for theCityusing ISO
Additional Insured endorsement CG 20 1010 01 and Additional Insured-
Completed Operationsendorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements
providing equivalent coverage. CommercialGeneral Liability insurance shall be
written withlimits noless than $1 000,000each occurrence, $2,000,000general
aggregate, and a $2,000 000products-completed operations aggregate limit.
c. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
16. Indemnification
The Provider shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and
employees, or any of themfrom any and all claims, actions, suits, liability loss, costs,
expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever by any reason of or arising out of
the negligent act or omission of the Provider its officers, agents, employees, or any
of themrelating to orarising out ofthe performance of this Agreement. Ifa final
judgment is rendered againstthe Cityits officers, agents, employees and/or any of
them, or jointly against the City andthe Provider and their respective officers, agents
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 4 of 7
CA.H
and employees, or any of them, the Provider shall satisfy the same to the extentthat
such judgment was dueto the Provider's negligent acts or omissions.
17 Assignment
Neither party to this Agreement shall assign any rightor obligation hereunder in
whole or in part, without the prior written consentof the other party hereto. No
assignment or transferof any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to
release the assignor from any liabilityor obligation under this Agreement, or tocause
any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liabilityorobligation.
18 Nondiscrimination
The Provider maynot discriminate regarding any services oractivities to which this
Agreement may apply directly or through contractual, hiring, or otherarrangements
on the grounds of race, color creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or where there
is the presence of any sensory mental or physical handicap.
19 Amendment, Modification or Waiver
No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or termof this
Agreement shall be valid or of anyeffectunless made in writing, signed by the party
or parties tobe bound, or suchparty's or parties' duly authorizedrepresentative(s)
and specifying with particularity the natureand extent of such amendment,
modification or waiver Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall
not affector impair any right arising from any subsequent default.
Nothing herein shall limit the remedies orrights of the parties hereto under and
pursuant to this Agreement.
20 Termination and Suspension
Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the
other party failssubstantially to perform in accordancewiththe terms of this
Agreement through no fault of theparty terminatingthe Agreement.
The Citymay terminatethis Agreement uponnot less than seven (7) days written
notice to the Provider if the services provided for herein are no longer neededfrom
the Provider
If this Agreement is terminated through no fault of the Provider the Provider shall be
compensatedforservices performed prior to termination in accordance with the rate
of compensation provided in Exhibit 'C' hereof.
21 Parties in Interest
This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for
herein shallinure to and bind, the parties hereto and their respective successors and
assigns, provided that this section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or
assignment otherwiseprohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the
exclusivebenefit of the parties hereto and itdoes not create a contractual relationship
withor exist for the benefit ofanythird party including contractors, sub-contractors
and theirsureties.
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 5of7
CA.H
22. Costs to Prevailing Party
In the event of suchlitigation or other legal action, to enforce anyrights,
responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailingparties shall be
entitled to receive its reasonable costs and attorney's fees.
23. Applicable Law
This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by and
interpreted in accordancewith the laws of the State ofWashington and venue forany
action hereunder shall be in of the county in.Washington State in which the property or
project is located, and if not site specific, then in King County Washington; provided,
however that it is agreed and understoodthatany applicablestatute of limitation
shall commence no later than the substantialcompletion by the Provider of the
services.
24 Captions, Headings and Titles
All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs orsections of this Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only andshall not constitute a part of this
Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections
to which they apply Asused herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the
plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine'and neuterexpressions shall be
interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be
affected by any determination as to who is the drafterof this Agreement, this
Agreement havingbeen drafted by mutual agreement of theparties.
25 Severable Provisions
Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof
is illegalor invalid for any reason whatsoever such illegality or invalidity shall not
affect the validityof the remainder of this Agreement.
26 •Entire Agreement
This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to
the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and
understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter
27 Counterparts
This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be one
andthe same Agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts
have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 6 of 7
CA.H
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties heretohavecaused this Agreement to be
executedeffective the dayand year first setforth above.
CITY OF AUBURN VADIS
Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Signature
Name:
Title:
Attest:
Signature
Danielle Daskam, City Clerk Name:
Title:
Appr.
LIa,41
s to form.
Darnel B. Heid, -• 'Att•rney
AG-S-053
Vadis
Page 7 of 7
CA.H
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
The purpose of this Agreement is to contract withthe Provider a non-profit corporation
that develops employment forindividuals with disabilities, on a yearly basisclean-up
program forthe Solid Waste Division.
Litter Crew
The Provider's LitterCrew shall perform the following:
A. Specific Tasks
The Provider's Litter Crew will collect and removelittertrash, and debris from the
shoulders of City traveledways (including but not limited to streets, roads, alleys,
paths, and parkways), public parkinglots, and otherdesignatedareas. Anadditional
supervisor possessing a 'Traffic ControlFlagging License certified by the State of
Washington, will performflagging on thebusystreets such as Howard Road, Kersey
Way and Auburn Way South. This additional supervisor will be available two days
per month.
B. Examination of Work Sites
The Provider shall examine all work sites thoroughly before commencingwork at the
site. It shall be the responsibility of the Provider to verify all the duties, assignments,
and job sites. All.existing conditions at the job site will be noted and copies with
verification noted, given to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator on a
daily basis.
C. Hours
The Provider shall perform tasks to completion betweenthe hours of 8:00 AM
and 3:30 PM,Monday through Friday
The Provider shall recognize the same observed holidays as theCity
The Provider will also take two (2) Floating Holidays per yearfor staff training.
Hill Lifter Crew
TheProvider's Hill LitterCrew shall perform the following:
A. Specific Tasks
TheProvider's Hill Litter Crew shall perform taskssimilar to the Litter Crew, but in
the Lea Hill and/or West Hill area(s) for a total of 15 hours per week. The Provider
will have an additional supervisor possessing a 'TrafficControl Flagging License
certificate by the State of Washington, performflagging on busystreets such as Lea
Hill Rd SE and SE 320 ' St one day permonth.
B. Hours
The Provider'sHill Litter Crew shall performtasks to completion between the hours
of 8:00 AM and 3:30 PMon threedays of the week, Mondaythrough Friday
AG-S-053
Exhibit A
Page 1 of 2
CA.H
Recvclina Crew
The Provider's RecyclingCrew shall perform the following:
A. Specific Tasks
The Provider's Recycling Crew shall collectrecyclables from the City-owned
recycling receptacles and maintain the recycling receptacles in the City of Auburn
Parksfor a total of 15 hours perweekfromApril to September The Recycling Crew
will be supervised and willbring a second Providervehicle.
B. Hours
The Provider's Recycling Crew shall performtasks to completion between the hours
of 8:00 AMand 3.30 PM on three days of the week, Monday through Friday
AG-S-053
Exhibit A
Page 2 of 2
CA.H
EXHIBIT B
RESPONSIBILITIES
PROVIDER
TheProvider shall be responsiblefor the following:
1 The performance and accomplishment of tasks and work assigned in accordance
with paragraph 2 below
2. The performance of all work as provided in this Agreement with its own employees.
Individualswho perform work under this Agreement must be carried onthe
Provider's payroll. TheProvider is responsible for administering and paying
employee wages, benefits, and all other employee-related costs. Although the
Provider's companyheadquarters may be located outside of Auburn, Washington,
the Provider shall provide a full-time supervisor in the Auburn geographical area who
will continuously overseetheProvider's employeework and will haveauthority to
represent theProvider in the day-to-day activities. TheProvider supervisor must be
trained in traffic control andmust possess a "Traffic ControlFlagging License"
certified by the State of Washington. The Provider will present the supervisor's
name, address, and telephonenumber to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling
Coordinator atthe beginning of thecontract period.
3. The Provider is responsible for the security of facilitieswhere assigned tasks are
performed as well as tools, equipment, safety gear, traffic control devices, and any
other items which maybe supplied by the City for the Provider's use in the
performance of contracted duties. No equipment or supplies will be removed from
City premisesexcept as required for the performance of assignedduties.
4. TheProvider shall supply the City with a quality controlsystem acceptable to the
Citywithinten days of the date of the Agreement. The quality control system shall
be a plan specifying how the Provider will accomplishmaintaining the level of
performancerequiredunder this Agreement. Quality control statements shall be
provided to the City's Solid Waste and Recycling Coordinator on a monthly basis.
5. The Provider shall supply a motor vehicle to transport its employees to and from the
designated work sites. The Provider's vehicle shall be well identified with signsand
equipped withsafety warning lights, strobe light, and emergencyflashers.
6 TheProvider shall supply rain gear foul weathergear footwear as required, and
clothing as needed for its employees.
AG-S-053
Exhibit B
Page 1 of 2
CA.H
7 TheProvider shall follow acceptedsafety practices in the performance of all work.
After every work shift of,litter clean-up and other assignedtasks and services the
following shall be done: the work areas shall'be inspected for firehazards; electrical
or power machines and/or equipment shall be turned off; outside doors and windows
closed and locked; gates closed and locked and all miscellaneousworktools and
equipment shall be inspected andput away
CITY
The City shallbe responsible for the following:
1 The City shall supplylitter bags to the Provider for its use in the collection of litter
trash, and debris.
2. The City shall supply traffic control devices, e.g. signs and traffic cones tothe
Provider so the Provider can place the traffic devices at work site(s) to protect its
employeeswhileperformingservicesunder this Agreement. The City shall also
providehard hats and reflectivetraffic vests.
3. The Cityshall supply the Provider with all grounds maintenanceequipment and
hand tools for performingoutsidegrounds maintenance dutiesunderthis
Agreement.
4 The City shall supply the Provider and its Auburn supervisor a copy of the daily work
schedule and anychangenotices to use as a basic guidefor the distribution of work
each week. The workschedule may be changed as deemed appropriate by the City
and a copy of such changesprovided to the Provider and the City The City shall
determine the priority of the various.assignments. The City shall verifythat all
services are satisfactorily performed as scheduled.
AG-S-053
Exhibit B
Page 2 of 2
CA.H
r
EXHIBIT C
FEE SCHEDULE
2012 Fee Schedule
Not-To-Exceed
Monthly Fee # of Months Amount
Litter Crew 7,039 12 84 468
Hill Litter Crew 3,485 12 41 820
Recycling Crew 3,165 6 1$ 8.990
Total Not To Exceed Amount 145,278
AG-S-053
Exhibit C
Page 1 of 1
CA.H
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6387
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6387
DNS
Staff Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6387.
Background Summary:
See attached.
O3.4.2.1.2
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0006, Proposed amendments to Title 18 -
Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to landscaping and screening.
(Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: December 19, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6387, staff
report to Planning Commission (includes
SEPA DNS)
Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance 6387
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
Ordinance 6387 will amend Chapter 18.50 (Landscaping and Screening) of the Auburn City Code (ACC).
The proposed zoning code text amendments will reorganize and update regulations and standards
related to landscaping and screening, ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component of all
development, that plant materials complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest, and there is
unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in new development.
On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments.
At the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council
for adoption of the proposed code amendments, with one modification to a tree puning provision. Since
the public hearing, the code amendments have been reviewed by the Planning and Community
Development Committee and the Public Works Committee. On December 12, 2011 the Planning and
Community Development Committee, after making changes to the landscape maintenance provisions,
recommend approval to the City Council.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.A
ORDINANCE NO. 6 38 7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 18.50 OF THE AUBURNCITY CODE,
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING; ANDADDING A
NEWSECTION 18.04 318 TO CHAPTER 18:04 OF
THEAUBURNCITY CODE, DEFINITIONS, ALL
RELATING TO LANDSCAPINGANDSCREENING
WHEREAS, from time to time, amendments to the City of Auburn zoning
code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current
development needs andistandards ofthe City. and
WHEREAS, theproposedzoningcode amendments will reorganize and
update regulations and standards related to landscaping and screening; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this ordinance is to ensure that sufficient
landscaping is a required component of all development, that plantmaterials
complement thenatural characterof the Pacific Northwest, and there is
unnecessary disturbance ofnatural vegetation in new development; and
WHEREAS following proper notice, the City of Auburn Planning
Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2011 on theproposed code
amendments regarding off-street parking and loading, landscaping and
screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and
WHEREAS, after fullyconsidering the testimony and information
presented at the public hearing, on October 18, 2011 thePlanning Commission
made its recommendations for code amendments to the City ofAuburn City
Council; and
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 1 of 15
ORD.A
I
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Planning
Commission recommendations; and
WHEREASenvironmental review on the proposal has been completed in
accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
with a final determination of non-significance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, theproposedzoningcode
amendments were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-
day state review. and
WHEREAS no commentsregardingtheproposedzoningcode
amendments have been received fromthe Department of Commerce or other
state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council findsthat theproposed amendments improve
the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates technical aspects of the
code, improvesthe City's development review process, and promote
sustainabilityconceptswhere feasible.
NOW THEREFORE, THECITYCOUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.50 of the
Auburn CityCode be and the samehereby is amendedto read as follows:
Ordinance No 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 2 of 15
ORD.A
Chapter 18.50
LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
Sections:
18.50.010 Intent.
18.50.020 Scope Applicability
18.50.040 Landscape development standards.
18.50.045 Preservation of significant trees.
1850.050 Regulations by zone.
18.50.060 General-;Landscape plan requirements.
18.50.070 Administration and Enforcement.
18.50.080 e - _ • e - •• • •> Alternative landscape plan.
18.50.010 Intent.
Theintent of this chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and screening requirements
in order to maintain and protect property values, to enhance the city's appearance, to visually
unifythecity and its neighborhoods, to improve the character of certain areas of the city to
reduce erosion and storm water runoff, to reduce CO2 emissions, improveair quality, and to
maintain or replace existingvegetation and to prevent and abatepublic nuisances (Ord. 4914 §
1 1996; Ord. 4773 § 1 1995, Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987 )
18.50.020 Ssepe,Applicability
A. This chapter applies to all uses and activities developed in the city excluding
single-family and duplex units on individual lots.
B. When additions, alterations, or repairs of any existing building or structure
exceed 50 percent of the value of the building orstructure, or a residential use is converted toa
nonresidential use, thensuch building orstructure shall be considered tobe a new use andsite
landscaping provided in accordance with this Chapterasserdingiy provided, that ifany existing
foundationorfencelayoutprecludes full compliance herewith, then the landscapingrequirements
may be modified by the planning_director in approved landscape plans. (Ord. 4914 § 1 1996,
Ord. 4304 § 1(33), 1988; Ord. 4229§ 2, 1987 )
18.50.030 Definitions.
at the tim f planting•
B. "Evergreen trees' are a minimum of four to six feet in height at tho timeof
sPacingtn-affleT
diameter—measured four f ct above-g irectef-rna
18.50.040 Landscape development standards.
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14 2011
Page 3 of 15
ORD.A
r-f s- _.-. 0BveF_provided_
ceparation between different uses or zones. Type II la•• e
addition to the trees, shrubs shall be planted at three fe^t spacing, in all directions, and
C. Type III Visual Buffer. Type III landscaping is intended to provide a visual
paration of uses from the street and the vicual separation of compatible uces. Type III
c, shrubs shall be planted at four foot
f in-aWdir
P. a
vicual relief between compatible uces. Type IV landscaping shall concict of deciduouc trots,
providod.
A. General Locationfor Landscape Improvements. Landscaping shall be provided in
the following locations for all types ofdevelopment, unless the City determines that the required
landscape is not necessary to fulfillthe purposes of this chapter.
1.Perimeter Areas. All areas that abut a street or residential property shall be
landscaped in compliance with this chapter, except where occupied by a primary building, walk or
driveway. Minimum landscape areas are listed in Table 18-50-040 A and B.
2.Unused Areas. All areas of a multifamily or nonresidential project site not
intended for a specific use (includingareasplanned for futurephases of a phased development),
shall be landscaped with existing natural vegetation, native grasses orsimilar.
3.Parking/Loading Areas. Parking lots, and where loading areas are visible from a
publicstreet, shall be landscaped in compliance with this Chapter.
4.Outdoor Storage Areas, Recreational Vehicle Parking, and Refuse Areas. All
outdoor storageareas, recreational vehicle parking, and refuse areas,when visible from adjoining
properties or public streets, shall be landscaped in compliance with this Chapter.
B.Landscape Area Requirements by Zones. Minimum landscape area
requirements are listed below by zones consistent with ACC 18 02.070.
Table 18.50.040 A
Minimum LandscapeRequirements by Zoning District
Minimum Landscape Planter
Width- Perimeter Areas'
Minimum Abutting
Landscape Abutting Residential
Zones Coverage' Street' Property
ResidentialZones
RC, R1, R5, and R7 Residential Zones' N/A N/A N/A
I R10, R16 and R20 Zones' 20%6 ft. 10 ft.
Ordinance No.6387 ^
December 14, 2011
Page 4 of 15
ORD.A
Non Residential Zones
C2 10%Oft. 6ft.
C1, CN 10%6ft. 10 ft.
C3, I. P1 15%6ft. 10 ft.
EP 10% 10 ft. 10 ft.
BP 15% 10 ft. 10 ft.
M1 10% 10 ft. 10 ft.
M2 10% 10 ft.25 ft.
Other
RO°/RO-H° N/A N/A NIA
DUC' N/A N/A N/A
Notes:
1.Minimumlandscape coverage required is the minimum percentage of net lot area that mustbe
maintained with a vegetated pervioussurface Vegetated bioretention cells or waterquality treatment swales (not
permanently inundated or oondedareas)may be included in therequired landscapecoverage percentage.
2 Listed planter widths shall be located entirely on private property.
3,The minimumlandscape planter abutting a street may be reduced in size using the provision
contained in ACC18.50080,Alternative landscape plan. The reduced landscape planter shall have an average width of
the requirementcontained in Table 18.50.040.
4.Landscaping shall only be required in conjunction with an Administrative or Conditional Use Permit
The type and amount of landscaping shall be determined at that time the Administrative or Conditional Use Permit is
approved.
5.Refer to ACC18.31.200 Multi-familyDevelopment and Mixed-use Development Design Standards
and procedures foradditional requirements.
6.Landscaping withinthe ROIRO-H zone is not required unless sitedevelopment includes the
demolition of existing structure(s) together with new construction. Under this scenariotheminimum landscape
requirements ofthe C1 zone shall be met.
7.Landscapingwithin the DUC zone shall be provided asdefined in theDowntown Urban Center
Design Standards,seereference to ACC 18.29.070,
C. Landscape Design andPlanting Requirements. Landscapedesign and
construction fornew development or redevelopment shall be compatible with the surrounding
urban andnatural environment. Landscapeplantings shall comply with theplant type, size, and
spacing provisions listed below.
1 Landscape Design. Landscaping shall be designed as an integral part of the
overall site planwith the purpose of enhancing building design, publicviews and spaces, and
providing buffers, transitions, and screening.
a.All required plantingareas shall be coveredwith a mixture of trees, shrubs, and
groundcover plants. Sodded lawn (not seed) may be substituted forsomebut not of all shrubs or
ground cover plants. If sodded lawn is used it cannot cover more than 20 percent of the site and
thoseportions of the lawn area must be served by an automatic irrigation system.
b.Planting design shallhave focal points at proiect entries, plaza areas, and other
areas of interest using distinct planting and/or landscape features.
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 5 of 15
ORD.A
c.As appropriate building andsite designshallinclude the use of landscaping
against buildings to visually break up expanses of wall, soften appearance, and create visual
interest through the use of plantingareas, wall planters, and/or raised planters. Loose rock,
gravel, decorative rock or stone shall not exceed 20 percent of the planting area.
2.Plant Types. Landscapeplantingshall be compatible with the character and
climate of the PacificNorthwest and complement the architectural design of structures on the site.
a.Native Landscaping. Landscaping materialsinstalled shall includespeciesnative
to the Puget Soundlowlandregion of the Pacific Northwest ornon-invasive species that have
adapted to the climactic conditions of the region in the following minimum amounts:
50 percent of trees.
ii.50 percentof ground cover and shrubs.
b.Trees. Trees planted within ten (10) feet of a publicstreet, sidewalk, paved trail,
or walkway shall bea deep-rooted species and shall be separatedfromhardscapes by a root
barrier to preventphysical damage to public improvements.
3.Planting Size and Spacing. In order to balance both an immediateeffect of a
landscape installation and to allow sustained growth of planting materials, minimum plantmaterial
sizesandplant spacing are as follows:
a.Trees. Trees shall bea minimum of oneand one-half in diameter breastheight
dbh) at thetime of planting. Evergreen trees shall be a minimum of four to six feet in height at
the time of plantingandmay include either broadleaf or conifer. Treespacing within the
perimeter planters along streets and abutting residentialproperty shall be planted no further apart
on center than the mature diameter of the proposed species.
b.Shrubs. Shrubs shall be a minimum of 18 inches in height, ortwogallon size
containers, at the time of planting.
c.Groundcover. Groundcover means low evergreen or deciduous plantings and
shall be planted fromeither 4-inch pot with 12-inch spacingor 1-gallon pot with 18-inch spacing,
Alternative spacing of particular species may be approved by thecity if documentation concerning
the effectiveness of the ground cover is submitted with the landscape plan.
d.Additional Spacing Provisions.
Tree sizeand spacing at installation shall be increased by thecity where needed
to ensure visualaccess for vehicles and pedestrians and provide clear vision at street, access
tracts and driveway intersections (sight distance triangles).
ii.Trees or shrubs with a full-grownheightequal to or greater than 30 inches shall
not be planted in any sight distance triangle. Sight distance triangles are determined in
conformance with the City of AuburnEngineering Design Standards, Chapter 10.
hi. A minimum distance of 15 feet is requiredfrom the mature diameterof trees and
the center of street light standards.
4 Landscaping Requirements forParking Areas.
a.GeneralParking Lot Landscaping Standards.
All parking lot landscape areas shall be protected with vertical or extruded
concrete curbs, or equivalent barriers. Bumper blocks shall notbe used as a substitute for
curbing and boundary around the landscaped area
ii.All parking lot landscaping must be located betweenparking stalls, at the end of
rows of parking, or betweenthe end of rows of stallsand the property line.
The maximum distance betweenany parking stalland required parking area
landscaping shall be no more than 50 feet.
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 6 of 15
ORD.A
iv. Shrubs, ground cover orlawn shall be planted to cover each parking lot planting
areausing the planting size and spacing requirements specific in ACC 18.50.040 3. above. All
groundcover shallhave a mature height of not more than 24 inches.
v.Modifications to protect drainagefeatures, easements, or utility facilities may be
allowed. Modifications that reduce landscape area or plant materialshall be made up elsewhere
on-site, if possible.
vi. Therequirements of this section shall not apply to parking garages or to display
areas forautomotive and equipment sales and rentals that are specificallydesigned, approved
and constructed for thedisplaypurpose and that do not reduce required landscape areas.
b.Specific Parking Lot Landscaping Standards.
Table 18.50.040 B
Specific Parking Lot Landscaping Standards
12 parking stalls or No requirement
less
Minimum planter width.6 Trees shall be provided at
13-75 parking stalls
7%of surface parking stalls feet the rateof a minimum of one
exclusive of circulation) per planter and/or one per
100 square feet of planter.
10%of surface parking
Trees shall be provided at
76 narking stalls or
stalls(exclusive of
Minimum planter width:6 the rate of a minimum of one
more feet per planter and/or one per
Crculation) 100 square feet of 'banter.
5.Landscaping for Outdoor StorageAreas, Recreational Vehicle Parking and
Refuse Areas.
a.Outdoor storage areas and recreational vehicle parking areas must be screened
from view from adiacent streets and from all residentially zoned land by a minimum six (6) foot
wide landscape buffer, This landscape buffer shall contain evergreen trees or tall shrubs, a
minimum of six feet in height atthe time of planting, which will provide a100 percentsight-
obscuringscreen within three years from the timeof planting is required; or a combination of
evergreen treesor deciduous trees, planted 20 feet on center with no more than 30 percentbeing
deciduous and backed by a 100 percentsight-obscuringfence. In addition to the trees, shrubs
shall be planted at four-foot spacing, in all directions, and groundcover provided.
b.Outdoor storage areas abutting the InterurbanTrail (regardless of the zoning of
the Interurban Trail) and other futuretrails connecting to the Interurban Trail shall have a
minimum 10-footwide landscape buffer containing the planting materials specified in ACC
18.50.040 5(a), above.
c. Trash containers, dumpsters, trash compactors, and recycling bins associated with
multiplex, multi-unit residential, and nonresidential uses must be screenedfrom public view onall
sides with a solid fence, wall, or gate constructed ofcedar, redwood, masonry, or other similar
building material reflecting the overall design ofthe site, and be appropriately landscaped (en.
climbing vines, arborvitae, etc).
6.Irrigation. No portion of any landscaped area shallbe located further away than
50 feet from a source of water adequate to irrigate the landscaping. Thesource of water may be
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 7 of 15
ORD.A
a manual{hose connection?or an automatic irrigationsystem (Ord 4914§ 1 1996' Ord 4304§
1(34) (35) 1988 Ord 4229§2 1987 )
6—Landscaping shall-only-be
nd--amount-of
approved-
B- R 16 and R 20 RrtssdenhplZo s-
l
C RO and RO H Districts.
5. e - ! et - _
I--require-a-4$-foot-wi -of Type-i
21 - • - •- , -- -G°Frng-.Gr
s-- ithin Fhn RO
intent of t code ms;-;e - ••-l
desig•-- - - ' - - .:!.!-! t -.. •
t• -et. - -- • •
e•= = - - - -- 'ng-lots and as may be-r
2.Abutting R C R 1, R-5, -R 7, or R 10 zone two foot width--Type-41,-ad}asent
B. -G 3 LF Districts
f
r = - ' -- • hog Typal'
4 Outdoor storage yards abutting any C P I or M 1-zone-
F.M 1 District
Z. - " --- -•_ ! -- - • -
Type Ill landscaping--a-Type-H-lai ssa
Abutting-any zone
5 For those building_ •_ - - -• -- - - • - - := - -- - •• • _ - ! ._ _
6 Outdoorstorage yards abutting other M 1 zonedproperty shallhave a minimum
e. • a. ::e . e ._- _ _. - -
regardless-ef_t•: • . .
landscaping-
G. M 2 Distiot-
Ordinance,No 6387
December 14 2011
Page 8 of 15
ORD.A
1.Streetfrontage. 10 foot width of Type Ill
2 Abuttin: . • :•:' .! et e • _
e - • e e -- e. tee
e _e: e .. :ee e •e-
e. e e•-. es • e e. see _ e.
I ee 't • e e-
5.For-those buildings that love frontage on a street a mini
ided-by
1. EP Distrist-
1 E-xcept as-provided-far--in subsesti (4)rzof-t,h;_ .-. . -. -• -- - -- -•-
r scaping-
2 The planning director may reduce the width of reqeui. -landcapng--by-up-.to-ag
e e •• - = -e•_=• - - :.__ :s, use of
Outdoor storage area. -•- s• •_ -
la• •... r' • ! e, a _ _
e e. .: - !e• ! e. . .• 1.1 ee, e 4944 § 1 1-996 Ord. '1304 § 1(36) (39),
1988 Ord -4229§2, 1987.)
18.50.045 Preservation of significant trees
A Retention. In the required perimeterlandscaping area, applicants shallretain all
significanttrees. A significant treemeans a healthy evergreen tree, six inches ormore in
diameter measured four feet above grade, or a healthy deciduous tree four inches or more in
diameter measured four feet above grade. Alders and cottonwoods are excluded from this
definition If the grade level adjoining a tree to be retained is to be altered to a degree that would
endanger the viability of a tree or trees, then the applicant shall construct a dryrock wall or rock
well around thetree The diameter of this wallor wellmust be capable of protecting thetree.
Areas devoted to driveways, curb cuts, and sightdistancerequirements, utilities and
storm drainagefacilities may be exempted from this requirement. Significant trees may also be
exempted from this requirement if it is determined by the planningdirector based on satisfactory
evidence pursuant to report prepared by a consulting arborist certified by the International Society
of Arboriculture. The reportsubmitted to the city shall demonstrate the significant tree is.
1 Damaged, or
2.Diseased, or
3 Has weak structuralintegrity that poses a safety_hazard.
If additional significant trees are to be removed, the applicant shallseek approvalof an
Alternative landscape plan from the planning directorunder ACC 18.50.080
B.Encroachment into Dripline No constructionactivities shall take place within the
dripline of a tree to be retained without extra precautions as recommended by a certified arborist.
The applicant may install impervious or compactable surfacewithin the area defined by the drip
line when a qualified arborist determines that such activities will not endanger the tree ortrees.
Seethe definition of drip line in ACC 18.04.318 )
C. TreeProtection All significant trees that are tobe retained must be protected
during construction by installation of a protective barricade or fence This will require preliminary
identification of the proposed area of disturbance for staff inspection and approval, then
installation of a protective barricade or fencebefore major excavation with heavy equipment
begins.
Ordinance No 6387
December 14 2011
Page 9 of 15
ORD.A
18.50.060 Landscaping plan requirements.
A.Persons Qualified to Prepare Landscape Plan. A landscape plan signed by a
licensed landscape architect is not required. However, if the plan is determined by the City to be
illegible or inadequate for review the landscape plan shall be prepared by a landscapearchitect
licensed in the state of Washington, a nursery professionalcertified pursuant to the Washington
CertifiedNursery Professional program, or a Washington State certified landscape technician.
B. Application. A landscape plan shall be required andshall be accurately drawn
using an appropriate engineering scale and ontain all information
specified by the planning director in the application form and accompanyingchecklist providedby
the City.
1.Adjacont streets,-publicand-private;
3.Location of on site buildings;
4— o s;
7.Location of outdoor storage areas;
8 motion-of signif4cant-trees;
D.Location of water sour^c(s).
If-the-subject property is-located-within the RO-districts a-landscape-plan-signed by a
rehitect-4s not required owever-a-plan-shall be prepared by the-applicant
scaping-to-be-retaineda nd-maintained-and-generis-nanaing-of
nningand development director
stfeet-frontages-with-the-dx-septien-&-&-weways-and-pedestnah-walkways-witffin-the-phapecty-
C. Fences. Wh n fences and landscaping-armed-alon '
y
tg
he-prpecty-lino, the
fence-shall-be-set-back-of-the landscaping-if the fence-abuts-a-street, soas tonot-obscureauch
landscaping-At-other property-lines-the-Landscaping-shall-be-located serve-the-greatest-public
benefit-
D. Irrrig ped-area-shall be local
F.Maintenance.
1.The property owner shall bo respect-': - _ -- -- se -
3.If the landscaping i_ •: •-.•- : -e- ••
e - -e iisatien-the-landscaping-isatil-notbeing•
Il also hold the it• harmless from all claimsand-expenses including
attornoy's fees.
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 10 of 15
ORD.A
Outdoo yards-that-are visible-from-a-street-or-,are adjacent-to
residentiallyzoned-property--shall be screened by a minimum of a fivo foot-width-of Type I
landscaping. Addition , • ••- :- --
H. Parking-Leats.
1.A plantar-area-shallbe-required--aong-- a-e,, - -- -• - . - - --pt
at no sight-obscuring-plants-mll be allowed ,.h,e11ever
safe
ressand-egress-from-a-public-street-The-Width efer thurter
area-she - -_h (H) for streetrontages;
rater area shall be
required nth: -•: :
parlcin9-spacesbetweena- -- -
itted-which-shows-that-the-int- • • •- __ -- _ -7 =e- ,--_- - •- -
tienmust-receive-planning-director-approvak
3.Eaeh-planter-area-shall-containat-least-one tree;a.^;:nip
wiper. For planterareas-in-excess-et30-feet-in-length, more trees are required
4--Each planter area shall containshrubs, spacod-three f et-on-center, and-be-a
minimum-of-one-gallon-in--size;
5. eesidential-ands onresiden ss spaces-shall--be
exempt-from-the-parking-Iota ndssape-requirements-
l Performance Asp rance.
shall have a value of 100 percent of the estimated cost of the landscaping to be porformod. If the
landscaping-has not been in- - -_ - • - -- :- •-• _
3. nee-assu - •-- -
J.Privy - ::-- • :: - _= -•---- •- --all be located entirely-en-private
full-length-of the-adjacent-property-
K.Sight-Hazards. The building c4Aeal-andfor-city-e
landscape--plans which-may affect-visibility for-ingress-or--egress, corner lots or other
ndscaping_shall-be-made-Ki-elsewhe,r^ s::°-
ntrees, as defined by ACC 18-50-.030(E), shall-be
rot_'•-- . -
M. cie-he-natural
character the-Pacific-Northwest
N. Landscaped-Berms. In addition-teethe-mini
s-may-be-required-to-mitigato any-impact
profest-The-berMS-rnay-be-applied-thfough-art-admintstrative-or conditional-use permit, contract
rezone, or 36 a condition a-•: e ez - •• •- - •-•sighificance-or
environmentalimpactstatement. The minimum height of the earth creating the berm stall be
Ord. 6287 §
2, 2010; Ord. 6231 § 5, 2009; Ord. 4914 § 1 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987 )
18.50.070 Administration and Enforcement.
A.Performanceassurance.
Ordinance No. 6387
December 142011
Page 11 of 15
ORD.A
1.The required landscaping must be installed prior to the issuance of the certificate
of occupancy unless the planning director determines that a performanceassurance device will
adequately protect the interests of the city;
2.The performance assurancedevice shallonly be valid for a 120-day period and
shallhave a value of 100 percent of the estimated cost of the landscaping tobe performed,
inclusive of planting materials and installation. If the landscaping hasnotbeeninstalled after the
120 days then the assurance device may be used by the city to perform any necessary work to
implement the landscape plan. This time period can be extended if the City determines that:
a.Installation of the landscaping would not be successful due to weather; or
b.Product is not available due to the timeof year.
3. The performance assurancedevice shall be accompanied by an agreement grantinq
the city and its agents the rightto enter the property and perform work. The agreement shall also
hold thecity harmless from all claims and expenses, includingattorney's fees;
4.Upon completion of therequired landscaping by the property owner the cityshall
release the performanceassurance device.
B.Initial Maintenance Periodand Maintenance Assurance Device. After installation
of the required landscaping, the property owner shall complete an initial maintenance period
lasting one year. The property owner shall comply with the provisions below:
1.The property owner shall be responsible for replacing any unhealthyor dead
plants for a period ofone year after the initial planting.
2.The planning director shall require a maintenanceassurance device. unless
converting a single-familyresidence to a nonresidential use within theRO district, for a period of
one year from the completion of planting in order to ensurecompliance withthe requirements of
this section. The value of the maintenanceassurance device shall equal at least 100 percent of
the total landscape materials plus installation.
3.If the landscaping is not being properly maintained, theproperty owner shallbe
so notifiedby the city. If after 30 days from thecity's notification the landscaping is still not being
maintained thenthe maintenance device may be used by thecity toperform any type of
maintenance necessary to ensurecompliance with this chapter.
4.The maintenance assurancedevice shall be accompanied by an agreement
granting the city and its agents the right to enter the property and perform any necessary work.
The agreement shall also hold the city harmlessfrom all claims and expenses, including
attorney's fees.
5.Upon completion of the one-yearmaintenance period, and if maintenance has
not been performed by the city. thecity shallrelease the maintenance assurance device.
C. Maintenance of Landscape Area (On-Going). Landscaping, includingtrees,
shrubs, groundcover or grass, planted as a requirementpursuant to thistitle, ACCTitle 16 or
ACC Title 17 shall be maintained in a healthy living condition. ll-be
for the trcc or shrub in a healthy-grew+
growing-precessAll landscapingwhich, due to accident, damage, disease, lack of maintenance,
or other cause, fails to show a healthy appearance and growth, shall be replaced. Replacement
plants shall conform toall standards that govern the original plantinginstallation, approved
landscaping plan, or as approved by the planningdirector. If the landscaping is not replaced the
property owner or designee shall be subiect to the enforcement provisions contained in ACC
18.50.070 D.
1.Tree and ShrubPruning. Apermit is not required to prune trees and shrubs on
private property. Pruningwhichresults in the removal of at least halfof thelive crown will be
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 12 of 15
ORD.A
considered treeremoval and subject to the provisions in ACC18.50.070 D. Tree pruning should
be performed by a landscape contractor, one that is certified by the International Society of
Arborculture as a CertifiedTree Trimmer or Certified Arborist or otherqualified tree expert.
2.Limitations on Allowable Pruning. Tree and shrub pruning shall be allowedonly
for the following purposes:
a.Removal of dead wood and diseased, crowed, and weakly attached trunks and
branches thatcreate a hazard to privateproperty and citizens;
b.Providing adequate clearance and visibility for safe use of parking stalls, travel
ways and walkways for the passage of persons and vehicles,
c.Eliminating traffic sign visibility obstructions,
d.Providing adequate visibility forsecuritypatrols;
e.Repairingsplittrees and limbs in order to save a tree and its appearance;
f. Removingor severing tree roots thatarecausing damage to public or private
property, includingcurbs, gutters, sidewalk, drainagelines and parking lot surfaces; or
g.Providing visibility for merchant signs and increasing parking lot lighting only
when the aesthetics of the tree or shrub will not be reduced.
2.Tree topping. Tree topping is prohibited, except underthe following
circumstances:
a.Branches interfering with utilitylines,
b.Significantcanopydieback has occurred,
c.Storm damage or prior incorrect pruning requires correction,
BD Enforcement. Violation of these provisions shall be processed in accordance with
the procedures defined under Chapter 1.25 ACC. The property owner or designee responsible for
correcting the violation shall provide a corrective action plan thatdefines how and when the
infraction will be correctedwithin the time provisionsdefined by Chapter 1.25ACC.
61 Thecorrective action plan shall be subject to the followingreplacement ratios:
1-a. For plants that have died, replacement vegetation shall beat least 150 percent of
theplanting sizerequired of the subject plantmaterial at the time of planting. Theplants shall be
of the sameor similar species to those plants being replaced, unlessalternate species are
approved by the planning director
2b, For trees or shrubs thathave been excessively pruned, replacement vegetation
shall be at least 200percent of the size of the tree or shrub that was required by city regulations
at the time of planting. The trees or shrubs shall be of the same or similar species of the plants
being replaced, unless alternate species are approved by the planning director
D. Pruning oftrecsorchrubcdonctoallcvia - --•.••:• -- -• - . •-- • -•- -- -•
3. The property owner ordesignee shall correct the infraction or provide a schedule
that defines how and when the infraction will be corrected within the time provisions defined by
Chapter 1.25 ACC. (Ord. 5777 § 1 2003.)
18.50.080_ •• - -' '- - '- • - • . . . . • . - -' : •• : • - Alternative landscaping plan.
A. Thedirector may authorize a reducedwidth of planting or-waive-some-oFall-of
the tanctscapievequirements ifthe-applicant-proposes-an-alternate
wouldash -
within tiip Db distrct the I
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 13 of 15
ORD.A
The planning director may authorizemodification of the landscaperequirements when
alternative plans comply with the intent of this chapter and
A. The proposed landscaping providesfor creativelandscape design; or
B.Incorporates the increased retention of significant trees and naturally occurring
undergrowth; or
C: Incorporates historic or architecturalfeatures such as fountains, sculptures,
structures and the like. (Ord. 6287 §2, 2010; Ord. 6231 §6, 2009; Ord. 5863 §6, 2004.)
Section 2. That a newsection 18.04.318 ofthe Auburn City Code be
and the same hereby is created to read as follows:
ACC 18.04.318 Dripline.
Dripline"An area encircling the base of a tree, the minimum extent of which is delineated
by a vertical line extendingfrom the outer limit of a tree's branch tipsdown to theground.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is herebyauthorized to
implement such administrativeprocedures as may be necessary to carryoutthe
directions of this legislation.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable. Theinvalidity of any clause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, sectionor portion ofthis ordinance, or the invalidity ofthe
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances.
Section 5. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force fivedays from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law
Ordinance No. 6387
December'14, 2011
Page 14 of 15
ORD.A
INTRODUCED*
PASSED*
APPROVED.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, CityClerk
It!
A TO FOR r
Daniel'B.-Heil, City Att. • -
Published:
Ordinance No. 6387
December 14, 2011
Page 15 of 15
ORD.A
ORD.A
ORD.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the
Auburn City Code related to parking and landscaping regulations,
administrative variance process, and outdoor lighting standards (Code
Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: September 27, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: See Exhibit list below.Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the proposed
amendments and make a recommendation to City Council.
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and is progressing in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
The proposed amendments (Phase 2, Group 1) will affect the current zoning code as follows: Amend and
delete existing code sections and add new code sections within the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). Amend Chapter ACC
18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative Appeals) by adding an administrative variance
process. And lastly create a new Chapter of the zoning code related to outdoor lighting.
The October 18, 2011 Planning Commission meeting will involve a public hearing on the proposed code
amendments. The Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council and will make a recommendation
to the City Council on the proposed code amendment.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Staff: Wagner
Meeting Date: October 18, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 2 of 7
A. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department, Kevin H. Snyder, AICP, Director
B. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:
Stuart Wagner, AICP Planner, City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
C. AREA OF IMPACT:
Citywide
D. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
October 4, 2011
E. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION DATE:
Currently scheduled for November 21, 2011
F. FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. Title 18 of the Auburn City Code (ACC), includes Chapter 18.68, Amendments, which
addresses amendments to Title 18, Zoning.
2. The proposed code amendment addresses specific chapters of the zoning code that regulate
non-residential and multi-family developments. This includes amending and deleting existing
code sections together with adding new code sections in the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). The
proposal also amends Chapter 18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative
Appeals) by adding an administrative variance process. Lastly the proposal creates a new
Chapter of the zoning code, ACC 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards, to encourage
appropriate use and design of outdoor lighting in certain zones of the City and encourage
energy conservation.
3. The proposed code amendment is supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan as
discussed under the conclusions’ section of this report.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the City initiated Code Amendments on
September 15, 2011 under city file SEP11-0020. The Determination of Non-Significance was
published in the September 15, 2011 edition of the Seattle Times. To date no comments
have been received. The comment period ends September 29, 2011 at 5:00 p.m.
5. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. An
acknowledgement letter was received on September 21, 2011. No comments were received
from Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report.
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 3 of 7
6. Initial concepts were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee on
February 14, 2011 and May 23, 2011 and the Committee provided initial policy feedback to
staff.
7. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed work study session on August 23, 2011
to review and discuss with staff potential amendment issues and ideas inclusive of the
potential amendments to Title 18 (Zoning).
8. The public hearing notice was published on September 23, 2011 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2011.
9. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 18, Zoning, scheduled
for the Planning Commission’s October 4, 2011 public hearing with a staff recommendation.
G. Conclusions
1. Pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.68.030 and 18.68.040, the following public
process is applicable:
18.68.030 Public hearing process
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city
council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting the
notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in three
general public locations.
Comment:
The public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for October 4, 2011
meeting the requirement under ACC 18.68.030. The public hearing notice was published in
the Seattle Times, the City’s official newspaper, on September 23, 2011 at least 10 days
prior to the public hearing. The public hearing notice was also posted at City Hall (25 West
Main Street), the Customer Service Center (One East Main Street), and on the City’s website
meeting the requirement for posting the notice in three general public locations.
2. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) are intended to reorganize and update
regulations and standards to create a more logical flow in the regulation of land uses and to
appropriately reflect changes in state law. In addition, these amendments are intended to
reduce redundancy and vagueness, add or modify definitions and make the regulations
easier to use and understand.
3. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) do not require any changes to the City’s
current critical area regulations contained in ACC 16.10 (Critical Areas). Any future
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 4 of 7
development subject to the proposed amendments to Title 18 will still be required to
demonstrate compliance to applicable standards and regulation specified in ACC 16.10.
4. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) will support current and future land and
shoreline uses that are consistent with the City’s current Comprehensive Plan and current
Shoreline Master Program. Staff has not proposed substantive or non-substantive
amendments to Title 18 that would be deemed inconsistent with the City’s adopted plans and
policies.
5. Auburn City Code Chapter 18.68, Amendments, does not have specific decision criteria for
text amendments to the zoning title. At a minimum, proposed text amendments are to be
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. The proposed
code amendment is supported by the following Comprehensive Plan Objectives and Policies:
Policy guidance on landscaping
Objective 22.2. To improve the visual quality of new development
Policies
UD-14 Industrial development shall incorporate appropriate landscaping and site
design to minimize its visual impact on surrounding development.
UD-15 The City should require all projects, both public and private, to include
landscaping. Codes and regulations which govern landscaping shall be updated and
revised and include provisions for continued maintenance.
Comment:
The intent of the landscaping and screening chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and
screening requirements in order to enhance the city’s appearance and to visually unify the
city and its neighborhoods. No changes have been made to the intent statement. As stated
in the applicability section, landscaping is required for all uses and activities developed in the
city excluding single-family and duplex units on individual lots. As such the visual quality of
new development will be improved by the requirements found within the landscaping and
screening chapter of Title 18 – Zoning.
Objective 18.5. To recognize the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and
to promote its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given to promoting the use
of native vegetation.
Policies
EN-33 The City recognizes the important benefits of native vegetation including its role
in attracting native wildlife, preserving the natural hydrology, and maintaining the natural
character of the Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the use of
pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants that may enter nearby water
systems) and reduce watering required of non-native species (thereby promoting
conservation). The City shall encourage the use of native vegetation as an integral part
of public and private development plans through strategies that include, but are not
limited to, the following:
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 5 of 7
o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes and in public facilities.
o Providing greater clarity in development regulations in how native plants can be used
in private development proposals.
o Pursuing opportunities to educate the public about the benefits of native plants.
EN-33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of native plant materials that
complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest and which are adaptable to
the climatic hydrological characteristics of the region. Regulations should provide
specificity as to native plant types in order to facilitate their use.
EN-34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in
new development.
EN-35 The City shall encourage the use of water conserving plants in landscaping for
both public and private projects.
EN-36 The City shall update and amend its landscaping ordinances to ensure that
sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development. Emphasis should be
placed on higher quality and quantity of landscaping.
EN-37 The City shall strengthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at protecting
large stands of trees and significant trees within the City.
Comment:
The new landscaping regulations contain provisions on significant tree retention and the
incorporation of native vegetation into the landscape plantings. Significant trees located in
required planter areas (i.e. perimeter areas that abut street and residential properties) now
need to be retained unless determined to be damaged, diseased, or pose a safety hazard
and fifty percent of trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be native or non-invasive species
that have adapted to the region. The new landscaping regulations also contain a minimum
landscape coverage requirement. This percentage requirement (between 10-20%
depending on zoning district) will ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component
of all development.
Policy guidance on off-street parking
Objective 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of areas adjacent to heavily traveled
arterials while minimizing land use conflicts:
Policy
LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual commercial enterprises along
commercial arterials to promote the sharing of parking areas, access drives and signs.
Such grouping can be encouraged through land division regulations, sign regulations and
development standards.
Comment:
The comprehensive plan does not contain a lot of policy guidance on off-street parking. The
City however should have regulations in place that provide for safe, attractive, and
convenient off-street parking and that it be compatible with surrounding land uses. The
proposed code amendments to the off-street parking chapter of Title 18 – Zoning accomplish
these goals through the avoidance of large and underutilized parking lots by establishing
parking maximums, increasing the number of shared and reduced parking strategies,
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 6 of 7
allowing for alternative parking lot surfaces, and permitted alternative parking layouts subject
to approval by the planning director. The proposed amendments will bring a more balanced
approach to parking and land use.
Policy guidance on flexibility
Chapter 2 - General Approach to Planning
Predictability in land use regulation fosters confidence in land and improvement
investments (both private development and public facilities), and can have a positive
effect on long term property values. It also fosters fairness and consistency, and eases
administration. It has the disadvantage of not dealing well with changing conditions (e.g.
new manufacturing technologies), unique circumstances or when someone simply
comes forward with a "better" idea. Flexible regulations can deal with such conditions
and circumstances, but may require a large commitment of time, expertise and other
resources to manage. Auburn's policy will be mixed; stressing predictability in single
family neighborhoods, while allowing flexibility in areas committed to industrial or
commercial uses where performance standards are usually more important than specific
use restrictions.
GOAL 2. FLEXIBILITY
To provide predictability in the regulation of land use and development, especially where
residential uses are affected, but to also provide flexibility for development through
performance standards that allow development to occur while still protecting and
enhancing natural resources and critical lands in overall compliance with this
comprehensive plan.
Objective 2.1. To provide assurance that residential areas will be protected from intrusions
by incompatible land uses.
Policies:
GP-11 Ordinance provisions designed to protect residential areas shall give priority to
providing predictability and stability to the neighborhood.
GP-12 Adequate buffering shall be required whenever new commercial or industrial
uses abut areas designated for residential uses.
Objective 2.2. To provide flexibility for major new commercial or industrial developments to
respond to changing market conditions without threatening the purposes of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy:
GP-13 Ordinances regulating developing commercial or industrial areas should be
based on performance standards which provide flexibility to respond to market conditions
while ensuring compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and with present and potential
adjacent uses.
Comments
The proposed code amendments include new provisions that allow for greater flexibility in
landscaping and parking lot design. Modification of the landscaping requirements can be
ORD.A
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 7 of 7
achieved through an alternative landscape plan that provide for creative design, or
incorporates an increased retention of significant trees or historical or architectural features
found on a site.
Further, alternative parking layouts can be allowed provided the appropriate number of
parking spaces are provided and vehicles can move in and out in a safe manner and with
minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street. Additional flexibility is provided through a
series of shared and reduced parking strategies. Here a reduction in the number of required
parking stalls can be permitted if a development is close to transit, has a low parking
demand, or incorporates bicycle parking and/or car sharing stalls (i.e. zip cars).
Lastly a new administrative variance process has been created where under specific cases
the planning director could grant relief to development standards (up to 25% for variances
related to building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width). All of the proposed code
amendments described above provide flexibility for development.
Policy guidance on lighting
Objective 18.7. Enhance and maintain the quality of life for the City's inhabitants by
promoting a healthy environment and reducing the adverse impact of
environmental nuisances.
Policy:
EN-43 The City shall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitants
to excessive levels of light and glare. Performance measures for
light and glare exposure to surrounding development should be
adopted and enforced.
Comment:
As stated in the intent section of the outdoor lighting chapter, new regulations have been
created to discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy conservation
and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and
within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed code
amendments are in accordance with the goals, policies and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of the proposed zoning code
text amendment as presented by staff based on the findings of fact and conclusions.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening (revised)
Exhibit 2: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.52 – Off-street Parking and Loading (revised)
Exhibit 3: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.70 – Variances, Special Exceptions, and
Administrative Appeals (new section)
Exhibit 4: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards (new chapter)
Exhibit 5: Determination of Non-Significance and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 6: Environmental Checklist
Exhibit 7: Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 8: Letter to Department of Commerce for 60-day State Review
Exhibit 9: Acknowledgment letter from Department of Commerce
ORD.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6388
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6388
DNS
Staff Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6388.
Background Summary:
See attached.
O1.2
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0006, Proposed amendments to Title 18 -
Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to off street parking and loading.
(Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: December 19, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6388, staff
report to Planning Commission (includes
SEPA DNS)
Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance 6388
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
Ordinance 6388 will amend Chapter 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading) of the Auburn City Code
(ACC). The proposed zoning code text amendments within the ordinance establishes regulations which
provide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-street parking and loading, will increase the number of
shared and reduced parking strategies, allow for alternative parking surfaces and allow alternative
parking layouts subject to approval by the planning director.
On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments.
At the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council
for adoption of the proposed code amendments. Since the public hearing, the code amendments have
been reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee and the Public Works
Committee. Both Committees were satisfied with the amendments proposed and recommend approval to
the City Council.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.B
ORDINANCE NO. 63 8 8
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING
CHAPTER 18.52 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE
RELATING TO OFF-STREET PARKING AND
LOADING
WHEREAS, fromtime to time, amendments to the City of Auburn zoning
code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect the current
development needs and standards of the City' and
WHEREAS, a need has been identifiedto address concerns over the
regulations on off-street parking and loading; and
WHEREAS, thepurpose of this ordinance is to establishregulations which
provide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-street parking and loading and to
ensurethat parking areasare compatible with surrounding land uses; and
WHEREAS the ,proposed zoningcode amendments willincreasethe
number of shared and reducedparking strategies, allow for alternative parking
surfaces and allowalternative parkinglayouts subject to approval by the planning
director and
WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City of Auburn Planning
Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2011 on theproposed code
amendments regarding off-street parking and loading, landscaping and
screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and
WHEREAS, afterfully considering the testimony and information
presented at thepublic hearing, on October 18 2011 the Planning Commission
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011 t.
Page 1 of 26
ORD.B
Y'
made its recommendations for code amendments tothe City of Auburn City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Planning
Commission recommendations; and
WHEREAS, environmentalreview on the proposal has been completed in
accordance with therequirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
with a final determination of non-significance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106 theproposedzoningcode
amendments weresent to the Washington State Department of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-
day state review and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding theproposedzoningcode
amendments have been receivedfrom the Department of Commerceor other
state agencies, and
WHEREAS, theCityCouncil finds thatthe proposed amendments improve
the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates technical aspects of the
code, improves the City's development review process, and promote
sustainabilityconcepts where feasible
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 2 of 26
I
ORD.B
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Chapter 18.52 ofthe
Auburn City Code be and thesamehereby is amended to read as follows:
Chapter 18.52
OFF-STREETPARKING AND LOADING
Sections
18.52.005 Intent.
18.52.010 GeneralApplicability.
18.52.020 Required ^"stroot pars' Number of off-street
parking spaces required.
18.52.025 Disabled/Handicapped Parking Requirements.
18.52.030 Reductions of the quantity of requiredparking.
18.52.040 Drive-+n through facilities. -businesses.
18.52.050 e Parking Design
and DevelopmentStandards.
18.52.060
duplexes.Repealed.
18.52.065 Commercial vehicles in residential zones.
18.52.070 Repealed.
18.52.080 Repealed.
18.52.090 meet&.Repealed.
18.52.100 Repealed.
18.52.110 Fractional spaces.
18.52.120 rds Prohib ted gonorally.Repealed.
18.52.125 Stacked parking.
18.52.130 Off-street loading space.
18.52.135 Alternate parking layouts.
18.52.005 Intent.
This chapter establishesrequlations which provide for safe, attractive, and convenient off-
street parking and loading and to ensure that parkingareas are compatible with surrounding land
uses. The City discourages providing parking in excess of thatrequired by this Chapter.
18.52.010 General-Applicability.
Except as otherwise provided in adopted contractrezones, development agreements,
design standards and guidelines. or similar more specific process, off-street parking and loading
provisions of this chapter shall apply as follows:
A. New Development. For all buildings or structures erected andall uses of land
property) established, parkingandloading facilities shall be providedas required by this Chapter.
B. Change in Use. When the use of any building, structure, or land is changed,
increasing the intensity such that the changecreates an increase of five or less parking spaces
required by the change, additional off-street parking spaces need not be provided in accordance
with the requirementsof this chapter.
1 Special provisions for theRO, Residential Office district:
a.Within the RO. Residential Officezoning district, if any existing, nonresidential
use is changed to another use, the requirements of this chapter shall apply in full to the new use if
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 3 of 26
ORD.B
and only if the change in parking requirements between the old and new uses is greaterthan two
spaces. except that if the applicantsubmits an alternate parking plan sufficiently justifyingthat the
existing parking meets the needs of the newuse, the planning director may authorize the
satisfaction of parkingthrough the Special Exception Process
b.Whenever there is a change from a residential use to a nonresidential use in an
existing building within the RO, Residential Office zoning district, the requirementsof this Chapter
shall apply in full to the new use except if the structure is being used as both a residence and
business, then if the applicant submits an Alternate Parking Plan sufficiently justifying that the
parking meets the needs of both uses, the planning director may authorize the satisfaction of
parkingthrough the SpecialException Process.
C. Modification toExisting Structuresor Uses of Land. Whenever an existing building or
structure is modified or uses of land are modified suchthat the modification would require an
increase of more than five off-streetparkingspaces, additionaloff-street parking spaces shall be
provided in accordance with the requirements of this Chapter.
D. Modification to ExistingParkingLots.
A. Off ctroct parking andloading lotschall be providod in accordancc with tho
or-relocated-
1.Any new building, use or strut - = -•- e - - e = =- -
change of fisting •ldings in tho C 2 zoning-d strct.
2.Who', _ - ., ." , .. -- sin expaesion
t - - - - - - - - - - -- -- • - o - _ #HS-section-chat y
ef-preyieu
sectie4
31 Anyparking lot hereafter physically altered shall comply with all of the provisions
of this Chapter except that such lot whichprovides five percent of its area in landscaping and the
landscaping is healthy and good maintenance shall be deemed to comply with ACC
1-8-50-0600-1318.50.040(C)(41.
sed-as a parking area chall bo
improved-pursuan _ is-shal1-inoiude-al
nef required-by thi- -•. e : , - -"- - - - - - I t' • - •e = .
52. For existing parking lots that are resurfaced in excess of 50 percent of their area,
then at least five percent of the entire parkingarea shall be landscaped consistent with Chapter
18.50 ACC.
63. If existing parking lots are restriped, thenthe new layout of the parking spaces
shall be the same as the previouslayout or if changed, then the changed layout shall conform to
the existing dimensional requirements ofthis chapter
s to a residentialctrasture, the
ssed-va
3.Whon thore are alteration ilding-outside-the-C-
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page4of26
ORD.B
b^
o
r^
w`'l
1
in
Q
g-re_ _ _• _ ______ __ _ _
pr°"°
ester than five n sew
c changed_to anothew6a
the r en.n of IL.i- - _ . _ -•- _ __ se-if-and
the-new use he-pla•• - _ - - _ _ .
preens&
7.Whenever thorn is a change from a ro
6.Whe•- •- - -1-used
use; except if the stnasture-is-being-used-asboth a re
development d =- e
parking-requirements for both ,
C. The required parking and/e ss-tea-street-or
speethed-
pr
F.Cross fleet areaincludes a i== - :- - - -- - - - - - - -- -
C. "Pa -_ - s— with
access toa street.
kt.Gress leasable arcs" is the gro-.
lebbie° mall manently-de ri -, sums-or courtyards
s to the building from the ext ran Ffor
tJighting-purposes-(Ord. 6287 §2, 2010; Ord. 6231 § 7 2009;
Ord. 4949§ 1 1997 Ord. 4229§2, 1987 )
18.52.020 imam-standards, Number of off-street
parking spaces required
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 5 of 26
ORD.B
e- • e •I be deteined for eh Each principaluseof
the land, building, or structure. For ancillary use- e:
e .: - - : •: : '•.':. ..:, . .. a ._. -: . e - - shall
provide the number of off-street parking spaces required by this Section. The following standards
are not applicable in the DUC, Downtown Urban Center zone; refer to Chapter 18.29ACC'for
specific requirements for that'zone.
A.Parking requirements by land use
1.Minimumnumber of parkingspaces. Each land use shall provide the minimum
number of off-street parkingspaces required by Table 18.52.020, except where a greater number
of spaces arerequired through a more specificapproval process such as an'administrative use
permit or conditional use permitapproval.
2.Uses not listed. Where a use is not listed in Table 18.52.020 the planning
director shall determine the number of required parking and/or loading spaces. The planning
director shall use the requirements in Table 18.52.020 as a guide,in determining the number of
off-street parkingspaces required based on the similarity of uses ormay'consider a parking
generation study.
B.Maximum number of parking spaces. Except for requiredparkingspaces for
persons with disabilities,spaced provided in park and ride .lots operated by a public transit
agency, spaces for carpools, spaces for electric vehicle charging and spaces within structured
parking With 2 or,more levels, the maximum number of parking spaces for non-residential uses
shall not exceed425percent of the minimumspaces required by Table 18.52.020
C. Measurement of floor area. In any case where Table 18.52.020 establishes a
parking requirement based on floor area in square feet (for example: 2 spacesper 1,000 square
feet (sf) of floor'area), the floor area shall be construed to mean gross floor area (Def ACC
18.04.430).
D. Usewith accessory components. Asingle use with accessory components shall
provide parking for the primary use, and each component. For example, a hotel with a meeting
roommay be required to provide the parking spaces required by Table 18.52.020 for hotel (i.e.
the quest rooms), and for a meeting room.
E. Obstruction. Removal of required parking or loading spaces from practical use by
obstruction, erection of buildings, or other actions as to reduce the parking or loading capacity or
usefulness thereof below the minimum requirementsestablished in this chapter is prohibited.
Table 18.52.020 Off-StreetParking Requirements by Land Use
Land Use Type: Unit of Measure: Required Parking Rate
spaces per unit of
measure
Residential Categories
Single family, detached Dwelling unit 2.00
dwelling, Adultfamily home
Two-family dwelling (duplex) Dwelling unit 2.00
Multifamily dwelling (one and Dwelling unit 1.50
two bedroom units)
Multifamily dwelling (three Dwelling unit 2.00
bedroom units or morel
Mobile home dwellings'Dwelling unit 2.00
Assisted Living Facilities 4 bedrooms 1.00
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 6 of 26
3
ORD.B
Plus onespace for each two
employees
Group living (includes 2 bedrooms 1.00
supportive housing,
boardinghouse)
CommercialCategories
Auto, boat, orrecreational 5,000 square feet of outdoor 1.00
vehicle sales or leasing, new or sales area
used
1,000 square feet of 1.00
showroom and service
facilities
Day-care centers Each 10 children in care 2.00
Eating and drinking 1,000 square feet of floor area 10.00
establishments
Food retail stores and markets 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
Health and Fitness Clubs 1,000 square feet of floor area 10_00
Hotel or Motel Guest room or rental unit 1.00
Mini-marts and self service gas 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
stations
Mortuaries or funeral homes Seat` 0.25
Motor vehicle repair and 1,000 square feet of floor area 2.50
services
Personal service shops 1,000 square feet of floor area 2.50
Retail commercial 1,000 square feet of floor area 2.50
establishments, less than
15,000 square feet of floor area
Retail commercial 1,000 square feet of floor area 4.00
establishments, greater than
15,000 square feet of floor area
Shopping centers 1,000 square feet of floor area 4.00
Office Categories
Business and professional 1,000 square feet of floor area 2.00
offices
Medical, dental, and other 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
doctor's offices
Manufacturing Processing and
Warehousing Categories
All manufacturing, industrial, 1,000 square feet of floor area 1.00
and processing uses, except the
following:
Warehousing 2,000 square feet of floor area 1.00
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 7 of 26
ORD.B
Storage Personal storage/mini- Storage unit3 Minimum of 2 spaces
storage facilities
Recreation, Education, Public
Assembly Categories
Auditoriums, stadiums, and
Seat2 0.25
theaters
Commercial recreation facilities 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
Indoor, except for the
following:
Bowling alleys Lanes 5.00
Pool and billiard rooms Table ZOO
Skating rinks 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
Commercial recreation facilities 1.000 square feet of usable 3.00
Outdoor recreational area
Hospitals Bed 1.75
Library, museum 1,000 square feet of floor area 2.50
Meeting facility, public orprivate Seat? 0.25
Religious assembly
Seat2 0.20
Schools(public and private)
Kindergarten schools Employee" 1.00
Elementary/middleschools Teaching station 1.20
Secondary(high) schools Student 0.40
College or university Student 0/5
including trade and business
schools)
Studios (dance, martial arts, 1,000 square feet of floor area 5.00
etc.
Tennis/racquetball/handball or Court 2.00
other sport courts
Each 300 sf of floor area for 1.00
accessory uses.
Recreational uses not listed Same as retail, based on size
elsewhere
Notes:
1. Within mobile home parks, parkingspace shall not be allowed within the required setbacks. Guest
parking shall be providedwithin thedevelopment: 5%of total requirement.
2. Seat, 18 inches of bench,or 25 square feet of floor space.
3. Parkingshall be provided by parking/driving lanes adiacent to buildings. Two parking spaces shall
be provided adjacent to themanager's quarters.
4. There shall be 2 visitor-parking stallsprovided for each 10 required employee stalls
Residential.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 8 of 26
ORD.B
3.Multifamily: oneand one half parking spacesperonebedroom andtwo-bedroom
vehicles
net be,,-w-allowdiowed withre vo%r2
et- •lus-oneadditieaal space for each
6.Fraternities, sororities, and dormitorio
basic daily-needs,
B.Commercial Activities.
t. - --
2.Ropoaled by Ord. 5777;
5.Health and physical fitness club-: -•-
area;
s shall-be-provided;
Manufaeta -- •e••: `- : .: - _- motes
areas•, . - ' -
8.- Mortuaries-orfuneral homes=one-parki•- • -_ -- --- -
0 Motels, motor-hotels—and otel . nd arte. parkin^ es per
sleeping . nit-mccpmy--vn:c
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14 2011
Page 9 of 26
ORD.B
3
12. Offices, including profs__ -•_
slinicsrets4;
13. Personal service sh
ll-be-provided;
14. Re- - - - • _, • e • - _ _ , _ - _ • . . • : -s: one space per 100-squarefeet of
Fess-flew-mar-ear
area;
arcade; - - - •-
ing-Activities-
1.Manufacturing, research a'n't testinglaborato es—creameues, battling
square-feet-of gress-fleer-area;
2.Warehouse-and-storage
Baildifict-Size
m)
20,001 to100,000 cq. 1 pee- 500 sq-:-ft-
ft- 10-minimum)
100,000'q. ft and up 1-per 3,000-sq-ft-
40-minimum)
4.Officespace shall provide parking a
D. Medical Facilities.
2.Nocpita -: - - - •
1.Assembly halls, audit s,a
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 10 of,26
ORD.B
l
5.
area
individual basis
ss-flees-area
F.Educational Activities-
clacsroom or teaching ctation;
e Slent7
4. Colleges and universities: upon review by planning director and hearing
examiner;
5d_N •chooln null - - - -- - - -_ -
6.
floor-area.
the use under __.s def_tion. (Ord. 6167 §4, 2008; Ord. 6140 § 2, 2007. Ord. 6071 § 3, 2007
Ord. 5777 § 1 2003; Ord. 5556 § 1 2001 Ord. 5170 § 1 1998; Ord. 4949§ 1 1997 Ord. 4304 §
1(40), (41), 1988; Ord. 4229§ 2, 1987 )
18.52.025. Disabled/Handicapped-P ParkingRequirements
A. Accessible parkingspaces for the handicapped/disabled shall be provided in
compliance with the International Building Code (IBC), theFederal Accessibility Guidelines, and
Washington Administrative Code, as applicable. These spaces shall counttowards fulfilling the
off-streetparking requirements of this Chapter.
B. Accessible car and van parking space sizeshall be as follows:
1.Car parking spaces shall be eight feet(96 inches) minimum in width.
2 Van parkingspacesshall be 11 feet(132 inches) minimum in width.
C. Exception: Van parking spaces shall be permitted to be eight feet (96 inches)
minimum in width wherethe adiacent access aisle is eight feet(96 inches) minimum in width.
Table 18.52.025-Accessible Parking SpacesRequired
Total Parking Minimum Number ofAccessible Spaces
Spaces Provided
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 11 of 26
ORD.B
r f.
Table 18.52.025-Accessible ParkingSpaces Required
Total Parking
Minimum Number of Accessible Spaces
Spaces Provided
1 to 25 1
26to50 2
51 to 75 3
76 to 100 4
101 to 150 5
151 to 200 6
201 to 300 7
301 to 400 8
401 to 500 9
501 to 1.000 2%of total
More than 1.000 20. plus one for each 100 over 1,000
18.52.030 Reductions of the quantity of required parking.
Except withinthe DUO zone; reductions of the quantity of required parkingmay be
allowed based uponthe following-provisions -•_
tablc:in Table 18.52:030 Parking Quantity Reductions.
Table 18.52.030 Parking Quantity Reductions
1. Joint Use of A reduction in the total number of required parking spaces may be
Parking Facilities allowed when two or more uses with different peak parking
demands will share a parking facility. In order for_the reduction to
occur the planning director must determine, basedon satisfactory
evidence provided by the applicant: that there 'is no substantial
conflict in the principal operating hoursand no substantialconflict in
peak parking demand of the uses for which the sharing of parking is
proposed. To evaluate the'peak parking demand characteristics or
differences in hours and/ordays of operation, evidence including,
butnot limited to, a description of theuses and their operational
characteristics, and a development plan shall be provided by the
applicant and accompany the request.
If approved, a binding agreement providing for the shared use of
parking areasshall be executed by the partiesinvolved. and must
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 12 of 26
is
ORD.B
be filed withthe City in a form approved by the planning director
and be recorded. Shared parking privileges will continue in effect
only as long as the agreement, binding onall parties, remains in
force. Agreementsmustguarantee long-term availability of the
parking, commensurate with the use served by the parking. If a
sharedparking agreement lapses or is no longer valid, then parking
must be provided as otherwise required by this chapter.
2. Reduction of A reduction of up to 50 percent of thetotal numberof required
parking for a use parking allowed forthe re-use of an existing building, based on
with low parking quantitative information provided by the applicantthatdocuments
demand the need for fewer spaces (eg salesreceipts, documentation of
customer frequency, information on parking standards required for
the property land use by other cities). In order forthe reduction to
occur the planning directormust find, satisfactory evidence has
been provided by the applicant.
3. Mixed Occupancies In the case of two or moreprincipal uses in the same building, the
and Shared Uses total requirements for off-streetparking facilities shall be 75 percent
of the sum of the requirementsfor the principal uses computed
separately. In orderfor a use tobe considered a separate principal
use under the terms of this section, the uses must be physically and
managerially separate in a manner which clearly sets the principal
uses apart as separate businesses or operations. Variousactivities
associated with single businesses shall not be considered separate
uses.
4. Transit Access A reduction in the total number of requiredparking spaces may be
reduced by 25 percentage for sites located within a '/. mile (walking
distance) of a public transit stop. A public transit stopincludes but
is not limited toa bus stop, commuter train stop, or park and ride lot.
Applicants requesting this reduction must provide a map identifying
the site and transit service schedules for all transit routes within '/.
mile of the site.
5. TripReduction Plan A reduction of up to 25percent in the total number of required
parkingspaces may be allowed for a business or other use that
creates and implements a site-specific TripReduction Plan and
Program. The Trip Reduction Plan and Program shall be reviewed
and approved by the City and yearly reports shall be provided to
evaluate the effectivenessof the program and ensure its continued
maintenance and operation.
6. Creditfor On-street Allmulti-family uses and non-residential useslocated adjacent to a
Parking—Non- public right-of-way where on-streetparking is permittedmay receive
residential creditfor one off-street parking stall for each 22 linear feet of
abutting right-of-way for parallelparking, excluding curb cuts. This
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 13 of 26
ORD.B
provision shall be applied for on-street parking on thesame side of
the street as the proposed land use. All parking for employees
must be provided on-site.
7. Valet Service A reduction of up to 25 percent in the amount of required parking
per Table 18.52.020 may be permitted, depending on the size and
type of the use if approved by the planning director.
C4
Zone Citywide
change-of-use-er-if-addition-is-smalle r
u des N9
4-8.52.010(A)(1)and •2))
change eau N/A Feslescpaces-(ACC 18.52.010(8)(3)
and-(1))
0
l Yes No
0
area (ACC 18.52.039(A)(1)(b))
se--One
Yes No
18-52,030{4424)
Joint use of packing-(AGG No Fes
48-62-()34){43))
E-1-8.52-(C))
sec t40 Yes
ACC 18.52.030(D))
Yes Yes
8-/a Yes Yes
2.Calculation of Shared Pa '•; _, :••-• -. rkiag-facilities•
b.Sumeach of the five vcrt'
c.The min - •
section-
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14; 2011
Page 14 of 26
ORD.B
calsulatlon-ohSha
Weekdays Weekends
Day Day
t 00 900
Night amine Evening a rn Evening
Midnight 4:00 6:00-p.a+. 6409 6-04p.m.
Uses 6:00-arrrh prim Midnight paw 4:00-p.m.
Residential 400%6O% 90% 80% 90%
O€AceNndustrial 5°.6 400% 40% 49% 5%
5% 70% 90% 400%70%
HetelIMetel 80%80% 100% 89%490%
40% 50% 490% 50%490%
3 0%40% 490% 80%484%
9ewNng-alleyarets4
churches 5% 30% 30% 3 00%80%
All-otheers 400% 484%100%100% 4.00%
charnels-
8-
4
5-
a
there hasbeen 3 change in-uscof the existing-building--tha
co, the red--:e e- ••e -e _.." . , -- . • .. ,- : - .-55
sofsub-:- e._ ; _.e
Pprovak
7- The-sense •e e e- • :_ _•_ : :_. : - -2 •ee_ .. -:••-• •Fa6longa6 the
the v.int • - ._ •e - --_ _ - _ . . "• estitute parkin eetin all of the
a
J°' —
se-must.bed'i
sandShared-Uses
1 In the r
use.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14 2011
Page 15 of 26
ORD.B
led in such
used for parking. The city may require installation—e --• - e - - •- -eee•- - --- -
whenever a need arises. • - •- -' - - -- - , •- e -- _ - • - - - -•. •
or a five ear period to sever the costs of converting thosecpaces to
eeCnnrivcrnvc.
t---- - _ __ _ _ _ _ __ _. . .- _ tho amount-of required
parking per ACC 18.52.020-of as high as 25 percentmay be-pecmitted7 depending on the cizc
e-- -- - - -- - -- - . (Ord. 6071 § 4 2007 Ord. 5556 § 1 2001 Ord.
5170 § 1 1998; Ord. 4949 § 1 1997 Ord 4229§2, 1987 )
18.52.040 Drive-throwghin-facilitiesbueinesses.
All banks, savings and loan associations, food dispensing establishments, and other
businesses which maintaindrive-throuehin facilities which are intended to serve customers who
remain in their motorvehicles during business transactions, or are designed in such a manner
that customers must leave their automobiles temporarily in a driving lanelocated adjacent to the
facility shallprovide on-site stacking space for the stacking of motor vehicles as follows:
A.Stacking Space. The drive-throw:hin facility shall be solocated thatsufficient
stacking space is provided to accommodate for the handfing-of types of motorvehicles using
such facilityduringpeakbusiness hours of such a facility
B.Driveway Location. The location of entrances and exitsshall be determined by
the city engineer
C. Shopping Centers. When located in a shopping center drive-throuehin facilities
shall provide sufficient stacking space to handle peak businessdemands and shall not in any way
obstruct the normal circulation pattern of the shopping center and not unreasonable interfere with
non-motorized circulation. (Ord. 4949§ 1 1997 Ord. 4229§2, 1987 )
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 16 of 26
ORD.B
r
18.52.050 O#-street-pafki Parklna Design.-and
Development,and Maintenance Standards
e•e -- . - -- - - II current ADA standards pursuant to
current-state-requirements:
If lighting is'provided, it-shal e. ------, • _ -_ , e -- _- - - • - - - - •-
O. Drainage Jackie- - - - - - - - -e -. - - - - -- - e - - -
E.Ingressand--egress shalt-be-a'- - =- -- - --- - • • - - e. : -
ales that
Id. ' and Chapter 18.50 ACC.
ping—or
J.Forparking lots in excccc of 50 ^pa^cc; the design
K. Tho maximum grade of drivewayc should be no moro than 12 per^cnt. Grades of
Required parking areas shall be designed, constructed and maintained in compliance
with this'Section:
A.Location of parking. Off-street parking areasshall be located as follows:
1.Residential parking. Residential parking shall be located on the same site as
each residentialdwelling unitserved; except for a mixed-use development as defined by ACC
18.04.625. No required residential parking space shall occupy any unimproved area within the
required front setback, or side and rear setback, except as allowed by ACC 18.52.050 E -
Surfacing of Parking Areas,
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 17 of 26
ORD.B
2.Non-residential parking. Non-residential parking shall be located on the same site
as the use served, or off-site. If parking is to be located off-site it is subject to the following
requirements:
a.The lot or area tobe utilized for parking shall be legallyencumbered by an
easement or other appropriate means to ensure continuous use of the parkingfacilities following
the procedure contained in Table 18.52.030 (1)Joint Use of Parking Facilities.
b.Whenever required parking facilities are located off-site, sidewalks, or an
approved pedestrianfacility, shall be provided connecting the satelliteparking facility to the
development being served.
B. Access to parking. Access to parking shall be provided as follows for all oarkinq
areas other than for individualsinglefamily dwellings and duplexes.
1.The location, design and construction of entrances and exits from the street right-
of-way shall be determined by the city engineer.
2.A commercial or industrialuseshallhave access driveways fromthe public or
privatestreet that are not intersected by a parking aisle, parkingspace, or anotheraccess
driveway for a minimum distance of 40feet from the street right-of-way, to provide a queuing
area for vehicles entering andexiting the parking area. The city engineer may require a greater
distance for uses with high vehicle trip generation or located along heavily-traveled, city
designated arterial streets.
C. Access to adiacent sites. The City may requirethat the design of a parkingarea
to provide vehicle and pedestrian connections to parking areas on adjacent propertiesor to
connect with adjoining public walkways (when a reciprocal accesseasement is availableor can
reasonably be provided).
D. Parking stall and aisle dimensionalstandards.
1.Minimumdimensions. Each parking space and parkinglot aisle shall comply with
the minimumdimension requirements in Table 18.52.050and further displayed in Figure
18.52.050.
Table 18.52.050 Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions
Minimum Width for
Minimum Stall Drive Aisle with
Dimensions Parkinq(c!
Parking Stall Type Width a Lengthlbl One-Way Two-Way
Standard parallel 9ft. 22 ft. 12 ft.20 ft.
Standard 45-degree 9ft. 19 ft. 15ft.20 ft.
Standard 60-degree 9ft. 19 ft. 18 ft.20 ft.
Standard 90-degree 9ft. 19 ft. 20 ft.24 ft.
Corn pact
I
8 ft. 16 ft. 20 ft.22ft.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 18 of 26
ORD.B
Figure 18.52.050 Parking Space and Drive Aisle Dimensions
90 degr-- stalls 60 d-I r-- stalls
w iww
I
r1
Aisle width
2.Compact parking. Compact spaces may be allowed within a parking lot up to a
maximum of 30 percent of the total numberof spaces. This maximum percentage can be
increased to 50 percent when approval is obtained by theplanningdirector followingthe
procedures contained in ACC 18.52.135. Alternative Parking Layouts. Compact spaces can be
clusteredor dispersed throughout the parking lot. Every compact parking spacecreatedpursuant
to this sectionshall be clearlyidentified as such by painting the word 'COMPACT' in uppercase
block letters, using white paint, on the pavementwithin thespace orthrough the use of signage.
3.Vehicle Overhang. Vehicular overhang of up to two feet is permitted, provided no
vehicle shall overhang into a sidewalk or walkway which would reduce the unencumbered width
of a sidewalk or walkway to less than four feet. A vehicle is permitted to overhang into a
landscaped area by two feet; provided, that the required landscape area of trees and shrubs are
not reduced in quantity and not subject to potential damage.
E.Surfacing of parking areas. Areas used for parking on private property, including
interiordriveways and access to a public street, shall be paved with asphalt concrete, cement
concrete pavement, or perviouspavement and shall have appropriatebumper guards where
needed. Paving is not required for temporary parking facilitiesthat have obtained a Temporary
Use Permit pursuant to the requirements of ACC 18.46A — Temporary Uses: however dust
mitigation is required Where a driveway crosses an improvedpublic right-of-way, it shall be
constructed with cement concrete. All pavement sections shall be designed to support the post
development traffic loads anticipated due to the intendeduse as approved by the city engineer.
1.Alternative paving systems may be provided subject to the approval of the City.
The alternativemustprovide results equivalent to paving.
2.For parking areas serving single-family dwellings and duplexes when located on
individual lots, this section shall apply:
a.Each off-streetparkingspaceshall be connected to an improved street or alley
by a driveway a minimum of 11 feet in width
b.Not more than 50 percent of the front yard or 800 square feet, whichever is
smaller, can be used as off-street parking surface. For the purposes of calculating the allowable
area under this section, the front yardshall be thearea between the right-of-way and the portion
of the single-familydwelling's frontfacade farthest from theright-of-way. The width of the front
yard shall extend toeach side property line.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 19 of 26
ORD.B
c.Driveways that exclusively serve non-requiredoff-street parkingspaces are also
subject to the surfacing requirement.
d.Off streetvehicle parkingspaces, including those for trailers, recreational
vehicles, and boats on trailers, that are provided in addition to those requiredpursuant to ACC
Table 18.52.020 shall be pavedwith one the surfaces listed above (Section 18.52.050 E), or
gravel provided, that weeds, mud or other finematerial do not work their way to the surface of the
gravel; and provided, that loose gravel is contained on the subjectproperty.
e.Boats not on trailers shall not be stored in the front yard.
F.Grades of access driveways. The grade of access driveways for off-street
parking areasshall be subject to the driveway regulationscontained in Chapter 10.04 of the
Engineering Design Standards.
Sidewalks or pedestrian walkways. Sidewalks or pedestrian walkways shall be
visibly marked with differentiated pavement or other methods such as reflective/LED markers,
double row of landscaping, or raised pavement
H. Landscaping. See Chapter 18.50 ACC.
Lighting_ See Chapter 18.53 ACC (Ord 6231 § 7 2009; Ord. 4949 § 1 1997
Ord. 4229§ 2, 1987 )
m e-for-single-family dwellings-and
duplexes.
For parking-a -- -- - • - - -srthi
A. For tho-:
the-fo1
e •
ce shall be connected to an im: . - _= - - e - : _ _
nd-30feetin lengt.
shall-be-a-mi.of ,, feet is the ar„_ ,^y-is a-d9_ ,•- :_ : _ -, •• °- -• - • - -
t ,_ -, • _ •s
UPC 902.2.2.1).
B. Off street sue• 2- - tieaal
vehicles,and-beats-ea-trailers tha
Off street parking r
ex_:, •- - - . _ _ _ _ : _•_It-ha s:
b.Cravel; providedthat eeeds l-e other f no ma
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page20 of 26
ORD.B
s.Anyothermaterial- '•- • -• --
s-are also
to-the-following
4 amily Dwellings-
a.Not more than 50 percent of the front yard--or 800--square feet, whichever is
eee-• - _- •e _ • - - e • he-total off street
2.Duplexes.
a.Not more than 50 percent of the front yard, or 1,600 square fcot whichever is
property-line.
b.On propertio- - - • • • -
g.
1.Unique front ya : _-• '. . - •_ .- -e •e . •- 2, 2-
ist:
ble aqua
C)(1)(a) and (2)(a) of-hi- -:- e-
te-avoid-sur#acing--o - -• : •• - - - - - - -- Fig--purpose . .
Ord. 1949§ 1, 1997; Ord. 1229 § 2, 1987.)
18.52.065 Commercial vehicles In residential zones.
A.No person shallpark any commercialvehicle on any property within the following
zoning districts in the city ResidentialZones R5, R7, R10, R16, andR20 (R 1) singlefamily
residential-4R-23--single-family re- e:•• - , - - - - - - 1, (R-1) multiple-family
family-residential-and (PUD) plannedunit development.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 21 of 26
ORD.B
B.No person shall park more than one commercialvehicle onany propertywithin
the R1 Residential Zone zoning district in thecity and no person
shall parkmore than two commercialvehicles on any propertywithinthe rural-recidential (R R)
Residential Conservancy RC zoning district in thecity
Ord. 6019§2, 2006.)
a
sure se#inuous use-ef-the-parking
faeilties--Doeumentatien-sha =- - - - - - - - • - - - - - - • e
C. Other uses: may be in areas ether than on the premises
of the s4.attorrmenT
E. A permit may be issued by thehearing examiner pursuant to the hearing
this-seene r
tw000nn tho parking a anal the.
pede
4.The design and configura 't• -
uses.
5 ? s- e -
listed in ACC 18.52.070(E). (Ord. 6071 §5, 2007; Ord. 1919 § 1, 1097; Ord. 4304 § 1( 2), 1988;
Ord. 1229§ 2, 1987.)
18.52.080 Off-street parking—In-lieu of fees.
Repealed by Ord. 4949. (Ord. 4688§ 2, 1994.)
48-52.^°80 Paarking-space-dimensional rogufrements.
s-
1. Standard sized parking cpacos parall: t •= t t=
m of 12 feet wide.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page22 of 26
ORD.B
them shall be consist-•
less-than-443S
One-WayTwo-Way
A 6 G B B
30 94 a z 3 1-24 20,4
45 94 48,4 458 204
60 94 244 484 204
90i 94 498 244 244
c . -6igFlated-a6
s eaaf raHuiremenEs fer
2. In theROdist '- „-
shall boa mini..- •
cizedpara :
table end FuA6er defined b., nub __ _ - - • • _ _ _ - _ _t-ai l
lots than 10 feet.
One-Way Two-Way
A @ 6 B 8
30 84 444 484 208
45 84 17.0' 434 294
60 84 4 4 464)! 204
90 84 16.0' 22.0' 22.0'
as--sash-by-painting t r-Ti
parking--spacesa istribut e• - --••--- -----_ : : :• • - .:•• -•-
cpace'- • --e •-- raged.
i616n6 of this chapter except
r--
shah-be-sensalted-
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 23 of 26
ORD.B
0
1 -- - •-_ nd""ape-area , cr
f - - - - -•
aped areas
ccth= cod by t atleas feet-and
the plan 'or inofeased- ingly.
631 §8, 2009; Ord.5733 §-1, 2003; Ord. 1919§ 1, 1997; Ord. 1229§2, 1987.)
requirements of any of the provisions of ACC 18.52.030. (Ord. 1919 § 1, 1097; Ord. 1229 § 2,
1987.)
18.52.110 Fractional spaces.
When units or measurementsdetermining the number of required parking spaces result
in requirements of a fractional space, any fraction up to one-half shall be disregarded, and
fractions of one-half or over shallrequireone parking space. (Ord. 4949§ 1 1997 Ord. 4229 § 2,
1987 )
18.52.120 Parki• ••
On-any—lot-in any RR, R S, R 1, R 2, R 3, and R 4 di
loath . •-- -:
except-a s-chapter.(Ord. 4949§ 1, 1997; Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987.)
18.52.125 Stacked parking.
Stacked parking, i.e. parking one car behind another is permitted forfuneral homes,
single-family homes on individual lots, and for designated employee parking within the RO,
Residential Office district only unless the use has complied with the requirements of ACC Table
18.52.030 Parking Quantity Reductions (ValetService) 18.52.030(E). (Ord. 6231 §9, 2009; Ord.
4949§ 1 1997 )
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14 2011
Page24 of 26
ORD.B
r
18.52.130 Off-street loading space.
Buildings devoted to retail trade, retail and wholesale food markets, warehouses, supply
houses, wholesale and manufacturing trade, hotels, hospitals, laundry dry cleaning
establishments or other buildings where large amounts of goods are received or shipped shall
provide loadingand unloadingspace on the same premises as thebuildingas follows:
A.Buildings of 6,000 squarefeetor more of floor area, oneoff-street loadingand
unloadingspace plus one additional off-street loading space for each20,000 squarefeet of floor
area;
B.Each loading space shall be not less than 10 feet in width, 25 feet in length and
14 feet in height;
C. Loading space, exclusive of driveways and/or corridors leading thereto, shallnot
I be considered as providingoff-street parking space. (Ord. 4949 § 1 1997' Ord. 4229 § 2, 1987 )
18.52.135 Alternate parkinglayouts.
Layouts and dimensions of off-street parking spaces, maneuvering aisles, driveways,
driveway openings, and other related features different from thoseprescribed in Sections
18.52.050 ACCmay be approved by the planning director upon writtenfindings that demonstrate:
A.The number of off-street parking spaces required by Section 18.52.020 ACC
unless reductions are permitted under Section 18.52.030) are provided;
B. There is substantial reason for varying the standard; and
C. Ingress arid,egress is approved by the City Engineer where he or she ensures
that adequate ingress to and egress from eachrequired off-street parking space is provided for a
vehicle'of the appropriate size, and that ingress to and egress from the off-street parking facility is
possible with minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorizedto
implement such administrativeprocedures as may be necessary tocarryout the
directions of this legislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or theinvalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances.
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 25 of 26
ORD.B
Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law
INTRODUCED.
PASSED'
APPROVED.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, CityClerk
APPROVED A S TO FORM:
Ii
Daniel B. Heid, City"tto7
Published:
Ordinance No. 6388
December 14, 2011
Page 26 of 26
ORD.B
ORD.B
ORD.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the
Auburn City Code related to parking and landscaping regulations,
administrative variance process, and outdoor lighting standards (Code
Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: September 27, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: See Exhibit list below.Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the proposed
amendments and make a recommendation to City Council.
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and is progressing in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
The proposed amendments (Phase 2, Group 1) will affect the current zoning code as follows: Amend and
delete existing code sections and add new code sections within the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). Amend Chapter ACC
18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative Appeals) by adding an administrative variance
process. And lastly create a new Chapter of the zoning code related to outdoor lighting.
The October 18, 2011 Planning Commission meeting will involve a public hearing on the proposed code
amendments. The Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council and will make a recommendation
to the City Council on the proposed code amendment.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Staff: Wagner
Meeting Date: October 18, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 2 of 7
A. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department, Kevin H. Snyder, AICP, Director
B. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:
Stuart Wagner, AICP Planner, City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
C. AREA OF IMPACT:
Citywide
D. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
October 4, 2011
E. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION DATE:
Currently scheduled for November 21, 2011
F. FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. Title 18 of the Auburn City Code (ACC), includes Chapter 18.68, Amendments, which
addresses amendments to Title 18, Zoning.
2. The proposed code amendment addresses specific chapters of the zoning code that regulate
non-residential and multi-family developments. This includes amending and deleting existing
code sections together with adding new code sections in the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). The
proposal also amends Chapter 18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative
Appeals) by adding an administrative variance process. Lastly the proposal creates a new
Chapter of the zoning code, ACC 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards, to encourage
appropriate use and design of outdoor lighting in certain zones of the City and encourage
energy conservation.
3. The proposed code amendment is supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan as
discussed under the conclusions’ section of this report.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the City initiated Code Amendments on
September 15, 2011 under city file SEP11-0020. The Determination of Non-Significance was
published in the September 15, 2011 edition of the Seattle Times. To date no comments
have been received. The comment period ends September 29, 2011 at 5:00 p.m.
5. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. An
acknowledgement letter was received on September 21, 2011. No comments were received
from Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report.
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 3 of 7
6. Initial concepts were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee on
February 14, 2011 and May 23, 2011 and the Committee provided initial policy feedback to
staff.
7. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed work study session on August 23, 2011
to review and discuss with staff potential amendment issues and ideas inclusive of the
potential amendments to Title 18 (Zoning).
8. The public hearing notice was published on September 23, 2011 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2011.
9. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 18, Zoning, scheduled
for the Planning Commission’s October 4, 2011 public hearing with a staff recommendation.
G. Conclusions
1. Pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.68.030 and 18.68.040, the following public
process is applicable:
18.68.030 Public hearing process
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city
council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting the
notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in three
general public locations.
Comment:
The public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for October 4, 2011
meeting the requirement under ACC 18.68.030. The public hearing notice was published in
the Seattle Times, the City’s official newspaper, on September 23, 2011 at least 10 days
prior to the public hearing. The public hearing notice was also posted at City Hall (25 West
Main Street), the Customer Service Center (One East Main Street), and on the City’s website
meeting the requirement for posting the notice in three general public locations.
2. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) are intended to reorganize and update
regulations and standards to create a more logical flow in the regulation of land uses and to
appropriately reflect changes in state law. In addition, these amendments are intended to
reduce redundancy and vagueness, add or modify definitions and make the regulations
easier to use and understand.
3. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) do not require any changes to the City’s
current critical area regulations contained in ACC 16.10 (Critical Areas). Any future
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 4 of 7
development subject to the proposed amendments to Title 18 will still be required to
demonstrate compliance to applicable standards and regulation specified in ACC 16.10.
4. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) will support current and future land and
shoreline uses that are consistent with the City’s current Comprehensive Plan and current
Shoreline Master Program. Staff has not proposed substantive or non-substantive
amendments to Title 18 that would be deemed inconsistent with the City’s adopted plans and
policies.
5. Auburn City Code Chapter 18.68, Amendments, does not have specific decision criteria for
text amendments to the zoning title. At a minimum, proposed text amendments are to be
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. The proposed
code amendment is supported by the following Comprehensive Plan Objectives and Policies:
Policy guidance on landscaping
Objective 22.2. To improve the visual quality of new development
Policies
UD-14 Industrial development shall incorporate appropriate landscaping and site
design to minimize its visual impact on surrounding development.
UD-15 The City should require all projects, both public and private, to include
landscaping. Codes and regulations which govern landscaping shall be updated and
revised and include provisions for continued maintenance.
Comment:
The intent of the landscaping and screening chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and
screening requirements in order to enhance the city’s appearance and to visually unify the
city and its neighborhoods. No changes have been made to the intent statement. As stated
in the applicability section, landscaping is required for all uses and activities developed in the
city excluding single-family and duplex units on individual lots. As such the visual quality of
new development will be improved by the requirements found within the landscaping and
screening chapter of Title 18 – Zoning.
Objective 18.5. To recognize the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and
to promote its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given to promoting the use
of native vegetation.
Policies
EN-33 The City recognizes the important benefits of native vegetation including its role
in attracting native wildlife, preserving the natural hydrology, and maintaining the natural
character of the Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the use of
pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants that may enter nearby water
systems) and reduce watering required of non-native species (thereby promoting
conservation). The City shall encourage the use of native vegetation as an integral part
of public and private development plans through strategies that include, but are not
limited to, the following:
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 5 of 7
o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes and in public facilities.
o Providing greater clarity in development regulations in how native plants can be used
in private development proposals.
o Pursuing opportunities to educate the public about the benefits of native plants.
EN-33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of native plant materials that
complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest and which are adaptable to
the climatic hydrological characteristics of the region. Regulations should provide
specificity as to native plant types in order to facilitate their use.
EN-34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in
new development.
EN-35 The City shall encourage the use of water conserving plants in landscaping for
both public and private projects.
EN-36 The City shall update and amend its landscaping ordinances to ensure that
sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development. Emphasis should be
placed on higher quality and quantity of landscaping.
EN-37 The City shall strengthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at protecting
large stands of trees and significant trees within the City.
Comment:
The new landscaping regulations contain provisions on significant tree retention and the
incorporation of native vegetation into the landscape plantings. Significant trees located in
required planter areas (i.e. perimeter areas that abut street and residential properties) now
need to be retained unless determined to be damaged, diseased, or pose a safety hazard
and fifty percent of trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be native or non-invasive species
that have adapted to the region. The new landscaping regulations also contain a minimum
landscape coverage requirement. This percentage requirement (between 10-20%
depending on zoning district) will ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component
of all development.
Policy guidance on off-street parking
Objective 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of areas adjacent to heavily traveled
arterials while minimizing land use conflicts:
Policy
LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual commercial enterprises along
commercial arterials to promote the sharing of parking areas, access drives and signs.
Such grouping can be encouraged through land division regulations, sign regulations and
development standards.
Comment:
The comprehensive plan does not contain a lot of policy guidance on off-street parking. The
City however should have regulations in place that provide for safe, attractive, and
convenient off-street parking and that it be compatible with surrounding land uses. The
proposed code amendments to the off-street parking chapter of Title 18 – Zoning accomplish
these goals through the avoidance of large and underutilized parking lots by establishing
parking maximums, increasing the number of shared and reduced parking strategies,
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 6 of 7
allowing for alternative parking lot surfaces, and permitted alternative parking layouts subject
to approval by the planning director. The proposed amendments will bring a more balanced
approach to parking and land use.
Policy guidance on flexibility
Chapter 2 - General Approach to Planning
Predictability in land use regulation fosters confidence in land and improvement
investments (both private development and public facilities), and can have a positive
effect on long term property values. It also fosters fairness and consistency, and eases
administration. It has the disadvantage of not dealing well with changing conditions (e.g.
new manufacturing technologies), unique circumstances or when someone simply
comes forward with a "better" idea. Flexible regulations can deal with such conditions
and circumstances, but may require a large commitment of time, expertise and other
resources to manage. Auburn's policy will be mixed; stressing predictability in single
family neighborhoods, while allowing flexibility in areas committed to industrial or
commercial uses where performance standards are usually more important than specific
use restrictions.
GOAL 2. FLEXIBILITY
To provide predictability in the regulation of land use and development, especially where
residential uses are affected, but to also provide flexibility for development through
performance standards that allow development to occur while still protecting and
enhancing natural resources and critical lands in overall compliance with this
comprehensive plan.
Objective 2.1. To provide assurance that residential areas will be protected from intrusions
by incompatible land uses.
Policies:
GP-11 Ordinance provisions designed to protect residential areas shall give priority to
providing predictability and stability to the neighborhood.
GP-12 Adequate buffering shall be required whenever new commercial or industrial
uses abut areas designated for residential uses.
Objective 2.2. To provide flexibility for major new commercial or industrial developments to
respond to changing market conditions without threatening the purposes of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy:
GP-13 Ordinances regulating developing commercial or industrial areas should be
based on performance standards which provide flexibility to respond to market conditions
while ensuring compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and with present and potential
adjacent uses.
Comments
The proposed code amendments include new provisions that allow for greater flexibility in
landscaping and parking lot design. Modification of the landscaping requirements can be
ORD.B
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 7 of 7
achieved through an alternative landscape plan that provide for creative design, or
incorporates an increased retention of significant trees or historical or architectural features
found on a site.
Further, alternative parking layouts can be allowed provided the appropriate number of
parking spaces are provided and vehicles can move in and out in a safe manner and with
minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street. Additional flexibility is provided through a
series of shared and reduced parking strategies. Here a reduction in the number of required
parking stalls can be permitted if a development is close to transit, has a low parking
demand, or incorporates bicycle parking and/or car sharing stalls (i.e. zip cars).
Lastly a new administrative variance process has been created where under specific cases
the planning director could grant relief to development standards (up to 25% for variances
related to building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width). All of the proposed code
amendments described above provide flexibility for development.
Policy guidance on lighting
Objective 18.7. Enhance and maintain the quality of life for the City's inhabitants by
promoting a healthy environment and reducing the adverse impact of
environmental nuisances.
Policy:
EN-43 The City shall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitants
to excessive levels of light and glare. Performance measures for
light and glare exposure to surrounding development should be
adopted and enforced.
Comment:
As stated in the intent section of the outdoor lighting chapter, new regulations have been
created to discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy conservation
and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and
within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed code
amendments are in accordance with the goals, policies and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of the proposed zoning code
text amendment as presented by staff based on the findings of fact and conclusions.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening (revised)
Exhibit 2: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.52 – Off-street Parking and Loading (revised)
Exhibit 3: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.70 – Variances, Special Exceptions, and
Administrative Appeals (new section)
Exhibit 4: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards (new chapter)
Exhibit 5: Determination of Non-Significance and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 6: Environmental Checklist
Exhibit 7: Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 8: Letter to Department of Commerce for 60-day State Review
Exhibit 9: Acknowledgment letter from Department of Commerce
ORD.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6389
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6389
DNS
Staff Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6389.
Background Summary:
See attached.
O3.4.2.1.2
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0006, Proposed amendments to Title 18 -
Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to Variances, Special
Exceptions and Administrative Appeals. (Code Update Project – Phase 2
- Grouping 1).
Date: December 19, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6389, staff
report to Planning Commission (includes
SEPA DNS)
Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance 6389
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
Ordinance 6387 will amend Chapter 18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative Appeals) of
the Auburn City Code (ACC). The proposed zoning code text amendments will add an Administrative
Variance process where under specific cases the planning director could grant relief to development
standards, not to exceed a certain quantifiable standard.
On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments.
At the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council
for adoption of the proposed code amendments. Since the public hearing, the code amendments have
been reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee and the Public Works
Committee. On December 12, 2011 the Planning and Community Development Committee, after making
changes to the code section on adjusting height, recommend approval to the City Council.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.C
ORDINANCE NO. 6 3 8 9
AN ORDINANCE OF THECITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN: WASHINGTON, AMENDING
SECTION 18.70.030 OF THE AUBURN CITY CO DE
AND CREATING A NEWSECTION 18.70 015 OF
THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO
ADMINISTRATIVEVARIANCES
WHEREAS, from time to time amendments tothe City of Auburn zoning
code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflectthe current
development needs and standards of the City and
WHEREAS, the CityCouncil deems it in the best interestof the Cityto
amend Section 18 70 Variances, Special Exceptions, and Administrative
Appeals adding an Administrative Variance process whereunder specific cases
the planning director could grant reliefto development standards, not to exceed
25 percent of a quantifiable standard; and
WHEREAS the City Council findsthat the City's land usedecision making
process should berevised so that minor issues are determined in relatively quick
administrative processes and major issues are thoroughly assessed and are
subject to the full public scrutiny of the Hearing Examiner process; and
WHEREAS, following proper notice, theCityof Auburn Planning
Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2011 on theproposed code
amendments regarding off-street parking and loading, landscaping and
screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and
WHEREAS, afterfully considering the testimony and information
presented at the public hearing, on October 18, 2011 thePlanningCommission
Ordinance No. 6389
December 14, 2011
Page 1 of 5
ORD.C
made its recommendations for code amendments to the City. of Auburn City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Planning
Commission recommendations; and
WHEREAS, environmental review on the proposal has been completed in
accordance with therequirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
with a final determination of non-significance (DNS) issued September 15, 2011
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, theproposedzoningcode
amendmentswere sent to the Washington StateDepartment of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-
daystatereview- and
WHEREAS, no comments regardingtheproposedzoningcode
amendments have been received from the Department of Commerce or other
state agencies; and
NOW THEREFORE, THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Section 18 70.030 of
theAuburn City Code beand the same hereby is amendedto read as follows:
18.70.030 Application.
In addition to therequirements for a completeapplication as set forth in ACC Title 14a
site plan shall be required with each application for a variance, administrative variance or special
exception. The site plan shall be accurately drawnusing an appropriateengineeringscale and
shall illustrate the following:
A. Adjacentstreet;
B.Boundaries and dimensions of site;
Ordinance No. 6389
December 14 2011
Page 2 of 5
ORD.C
C. Locationof buildings;
D. Locationof parking areas;
E.Location of feature needing variance. (Ord. 4840 § 1 1996; Ord. 4229 § 2,
1987 )
Section 2. New Section to City Code. That a new Section
18.70.015 of theAuburn City Code be and the same hereby is created to read as
follows.
18.70.015 Administrative Variance
A. Theplanning director may in specific cases, authorize a variance to the
development regulations, subiect to the criteria set below.
1.Building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width
a. Applicability. These shall include variances tobuilding setbacks, lot coverage, lot
area, and lot width not to exceed 25 percent of a quantifiable standard.
b. Criteria. Theplanning director may. in specific cases, authorize a variance to the
development regulations, subiect to compliance with one or more of the following criteria:
That the variance, if granted, willnot alter the character of the neighborhood, or
be detrimental to surrounding properties in which the lot is located
ii.That the special circumstances and conditionsassociated with the variance are
not a result of the actions of the applicant.
Literal interpretation of the provisions of thistitle would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enioved by other properties in the same zoning district.
iv. The approval of the variance will be consistent with the purpose of this titleand
the zoning district in which the property is located.
2.Variance to building height
a.Applicability. The construction of a principal or accessory building which exceeds
the height limit may be authorized upon a lot, not to exceed 50 percent of a quantifiable standard.
Refer to Chapter 18.29 ACCfor varying height within the Downtown Urban Center, DUC zoning
district.
b.Additional Public Notice Requirements. If a residentialzoning district is within 300
feet of the subject site, then a public comment period shall occurfollowing the procedures
contained in ACC Title 14. The planning director or designee shall render a decision within 10
days following the close of the public comment period.
c.Criteria. Theplanning director may, in specific cases, authorize a variance to the
height of buildings, subiect to compliance with one or more of the following criteria:
Additionalheight shall be the minimumnecessary to afford relief.
U.That the variance, if granted, will not alter the character of the neighborhood, or
be detrimental to surroundingproperties in which the lot is located
ii.The approval of the variance will be consistent with the purpose of this title and
the zoning district in which the property is located.
B.In authorization of an administrativevariance, theplanning director mayattach
such conditions regarding thelocation, character and other features of the proposed structureor
useas helshe may deemnecessary to carry outthe intent and purpose of thistitle and in the
public interest.
C. A vanance so authorized shall become void after the expiration of one year, or
longer period if specified at the time of issuance. if no building permit, occupancy permit or
businessregistration has been issued in accordance with the plans for which such variance was
Ordinance No. 6389
December 14 2011
Page 3 of 5
ORD.C
y.
authorized. Theplanning director may extend the period of varianceauthorization for one
additionalyear upon a finding that there hasbeen no basic change in pertinent conditions
surrounding the property at the timeof the original application.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carryoutthe
directions of this legislation.
Section 4. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, ortheinvalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, orthe validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances.
Section 5. Effective date. ThisOrdinance shall takeeffect and be
in forcefivedays from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law
INTRODUCED.
PASSED.
APPROVED.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
Ordinance No. 6389
December 14 2011
Page 4 of 5
ORD.C
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, CityClerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
idgit /
Daniel B.2Heid, City Attar -y
Published:
Ordinance No. 6389
December 14 2011
Page 5'of 5
ORD.C
ORD.C
ORD.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the
Auburn City Code related to parking and landscaping regulations,
administrative variance process, and outdoor lighting standards (Code
Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: September 27, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: See Exhibit list below.Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the proposed
amendments and make a recommendation to City Council.
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and is progressing in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
The proposed amendments (Phase 2, Group 1) will affect the current zoning code as follows: Amend and
delete existing code sections and add new code sections within the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). Amend Chapter ACC
18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative Appeals) by adding an administrative variance
process. And lastly create a new Chapter of the zoning code related to outdoor lighting.
The October 18, 2011 Planning Commission meeting will involve a public hearing on the proposed code
amendments. The Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council and will make a recommendation
to the City Council on the proposed code amendment.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Staff: Wagner
Meeting Date: October 18, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 2 of 7
A. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department, Kevin H. Snyder, AICP, Director
B. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:
Stuart Wagner, AICP Planner, City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
C. AREA OF IMPACT:
Citywide
D. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
October 4, 2011
E. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION DATE:
Currently scheduled for November 21, 2011
F. FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. Title 18 of the Auburn City Code (ACC), includes Chapter 18.68, Amendments, which
addresses amendments to Title 18, Zoning.
2. The proposed code amendment addresses specific chapters of the zoning code that regulate
non-residential and multi-family developments. This includes amending and deleting existing
code sections together with adding new code sections in the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). The
proposal also amends Chapter 18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative
Appeals) by adding an administrative variance process. Lastly the proposal creates a new
Chapter of the zoning code, ACC 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards, to encourage
appropriate use and design of outdoor lighting in certain zones of the City and encourage
energy conservation.
3. The proposed code amendment is supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan as
discussed under the conclusions’ section of this report.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the City initiated Code Amendments on
September 15, 2011 under city file SEP11-0020. The Determination of Non-Significance was
published in the September 15, 2011 edition of the Seattle Times. To date no comments
have been received. The comment period ends September 29, 2011 at 5:00 p.m.
5. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. An
acknowledgement letter was received on September 21, 2011. No comments were received
from Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report.
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 3 of 7
6. Initial concepts were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee on
February 14, 2011 and May 23, 2011 and the Committee provided initial policy feedback to
staff.
7. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed work study session on August 23, 2011
to review and discuss with staff potential amendment issues and ideas inclusive of the
potential amendments to Title 18 (Zoning).
8. The public hearing notice was published on September 23, 2011 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2011.
9. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 18, Zoning, scheduled
for the Planning Commission’s October 4, 2011 public hearing with a staff recommendation.
G. Conclusions
1. Pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.68.030 and 18.68.040, the following public
process is applicable:
18.68.030 Public hearing process
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city
council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting the
notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in three
general public locations.
Comment:
The public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for October 4, 2011
meeting the requirement under ACC 18.68.030. The public hearing notice was published in
the Seattle Times, the City’s official newspaper, on September 23, 2011 at least 10 days
prior to the public hearing. The public hearing notice was also posted at City Hall (25 West
Main Street), the Customer Service Center (One East Main Street), and on the City’s website
meeting the requirement for posting the notice in three general public locations.
2. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) are intended to reorganize and update
regulations and standards to create a more logical flow in the regulation of land uses and to
appropriately reflect changes in state law. In addition, these amendments are intended to
reduce redundancy and vagueness, add or modify definitions and make the regulations
easier to use and understand.
3. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) do not require any changes to the City’s
current critical area regulations contained in ACC 16.10 (Critical Areas). Any future
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 4 of 7
development subject to the proposed amendments to Title 18 will still be required to
demonstrate compliance to applicable standards and regulation specified in ACC 16.10.
4. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) will support current and future land and
shoreline uses that are consistent with the City’s current Comprehensive Plan and current
Shoreline Master Program. Staff has not proposed substantive or non-substantive
amendments to Title 18 that would be deemed inconsistent with the City’s adopted plans and
policies.
5. Auburn City Code Chapter 18.68, Amendments, does not have specific decision criteria for
text amendments to the zoning title. At a minimum, proposed text amendments are to be
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. The proposed
code amendment is supported by the following Comprehensive Plan Objectives and Policies:
Policy guidance on landscaping
Objective 22.2. To improve the visual quality of new development
Policies
UD-14 Industrial development shall incorporate appropriate landscaping and site
design to minimize its visual impact on surrounding development.
UD-15 The City should require all projects, both public and private, to include
landscaping. Codes and regulations which govern landscaping shall be updated and
revised and include provisions for continued maintenance.
Comment:
The intent of the landscaping and screening chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and
screening requirements in order to enhance the city’s appearance and to visually unify the
city and its neighborhoods. No changes have been made to the intent statement. As stated
in the applicability section, landscaping is required for all uses and activities developed in the
city excluding single-family and duplex units on individual lots. As such the visual quality of
new development will be improved by the requirements found within the landscaping and
screening chapter of Title 18 – Zoning.
Objective 18.5. To recognize the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and
to promote its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given to promoting the use
of native vegetation.
Policies
EN-33 The City recognizes the important benefits of native vegetation including its role
in attracting native wildlife, preserving the natural hydrology, and maintaining the natural
character of the Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the use of
pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants that may enter nearby water
systems) and reduce watering required of non-native species (thereby promoting
conservation). The City shall encourage the use of native vegetation as an integral part
of public and private development plans through strategies that include, but are not
limited to, the following:
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 5 of 7
o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes and in public facilities.
o Providing greater clarity in development regulations in how native plants can be used
in private development proposals.
o Pursuing opportunities to educate the public about the benefits of native plants.
EN-33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of native plant materials that
complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest and which are adaptable to
the climatic hydrological characteristics of the region. Regulations should provide
specificity as to native plant types in order to facilitate their use.
EN-34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in
new development.
EN-35 The City shall encourage the use of water conserving plants in landscaping for
both public and private projects.
EN-36 The City shall update and amend its landscaping ordinances to ensure that
sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development. Emphasis should be
placed on higher quality and quantity of landscaping.
EN-37 The City shall strengthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at protecting
large stands of trees and significant trees within the City.
Comment:
The new landscaping regulations contain provisions on significant tree retention and the
incorporation of native vegetation into the landscape plantings. Significant trees located in
required planter areas (i.e. perimeter areas that abut street and residential properties) now
need to be retained unless determined to be damaged, diseased, or pose a safety hazard
and fifty percent of trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be native or non-invasive species
that have adapted to the region. The new landscaping regulations also contain a minimum
landscape coverage requirement. This percentage requirement (between 10-20%
depending on zoning district) will ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component
of all development.
Policy guidance on off-street parking
Objective 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of areas adjacent to heavily traveled
arterials while minimizing land use conflicts:
Policy
LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual commercial enterprises along
commercial arterials to promote the sharing of parking areas, access drives and signs.
Such grouping can be encouraged through land division regulations, sign regulations and
development standards.
Comment:
The comprehensive plan does not contain a lot of policy guidance on off-street parking. The
City however should have regulations in place that provide for safe, attractive, and
convenient off-street parking and that it be compatible with surrounding land uses. The
proposed code amendments to the off-street parking chapter of Title 18 – Zoning accomplish
these goals through the avoidance of large and underutilized parking lots by establishing
parking maximums, increasing the number of shared and reduced parking strategies,
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 6 of 7
allowing for alternative parking lot surfaces, and permitted alternative parking layouts subject
to approval by the planning director. The proposed amendments will bring a more balanced
approach to parking and land use.
Policy guidance on flexibility
Chapter 2 - General Approach to Planning
Predictability in land use regulation fosters confidence in land and improvement
investments (both private development and public facilities), and can have a positive
effect on long term property values. It also fosters fairness and consistency, and eases
administration. It has the disadvantage of not dealing well with changing conditions (e.g.
new manufacturing technologies), unique circumstances or when someone simply
comes forward with a "better" idea. Flexible regulations can deal with such conditions
and circumstances, but may require a large commitment of time, expertise and other
resources to manage. Auburn's policy will be mixed; stressing predictability in single
family neighborhoods, while allowing flexibility in areas committed to industrial or
commercial uses where performance standards are usually more important than specific
use restrictions.
GOAL 2. FLEXIBILITY
To provide predictability in the regulation of land use and development, especially where
residential uses are affected, but to also provide flexibility for development through
performance standards that allow development to occur while still protecting and
enhancing natural resources and critical lands in overall compliance with this
comprehensive plan.
Objective 2.1. To provide assurance that residential areas will be protected from intrusions
by incompatible land uses.
Policies:
GP-11 Ordinance provisions designed to protect residential areas shall give priority to
providing predictability and stability to the neighborhood.
GP-12 Adequate buffering shall be required whenever new commercial or industrial
uses abut areas designated for residential uses.
Objective 2.2. To provide flexibility for major new commercial or industrial developments to
respond to changing market conditions without threatening the purposes of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy:
GP-13 Ordinances regulating developing commercial or industrial areas should be
based on performance standards which provide flexibility to respond to market conditions
while ensuring compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and with present and potential
adjacent uses.
Comments
The proposed code amendments include new provisions that allow for greater flexibility in
landscaping and parking lot design. Modification of the landscaping requirements can be
ORD.C
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 7 of 7
achieved through an alternative landscape plan that provide for creative design, or
incorporates an increased retention of significant trees or historical or architectural features
found on a site.
Further, alternative parking layouts can be allowed provided the appropriate number of
parking spaces are provided and vehicles can move in and out in a safe manner and with
minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street. Additional flexibility is provided through a
series of shared and reduced parking strategies. Here a reduction in the number of required
parking stalls can be permitted if a development is close to transit, has a low parking
demand, or incorporates bicycle parking and/or car sharing stalls (i.e. zip cars).
Lastly a new administrative variance process has been created where under specific cases
the planning director could grant relief to development standards (up to 25% for variances
related to building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width). All of the proposed code
amendments described above provide flexibility for development.
Policy guidance on lighting
Objective 18.7. Enhance and maintain the quality of life for the City's inhabitants by
promoting a healthy environment and reducing the adverse impact of
environmental nuisances.
Policy:
EN-43 The City shall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitants
to excessive levels of light and glare. Performance measures for
light and glare exposure to surrounding development should be
adopted and enforced.
Comment:
As stated in the intent section of the outdoor lighting chapter, new regulations have been
created to discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy conservation
and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and
within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed code
amendments are in accordance with the goals, policies and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of the proposed zoning code
text amendment as presented by staff based on the findings of fact and conclusions.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening (revised)
Exhibit 2: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.52 – Off-street Parking and Loading (revised)
Exhibit 3: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.70 – Variances, Special Exceptions, and
Administrative Appeals (new section)
Exhibit 4: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards (new chapter)
Exhibit 5: Determination of Non-Significance and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 6: Environmental Checklist
Exhibit 7: Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 8: Letter to Department of Commerce for 60-day State Review
Exhibit 9: Acknowledgment letter from Department of Commerce
ORD.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6390
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6390
DNS
Staff report
Agenda Bill
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6390.
Background Summary:
See Attached.
O3.4.2.1.2
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.D
ORDINANCE NO. 63 9 0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, CREATING A
NEW CHAPTER 18 55 TO THEAUBURNCITY
CODE RELATING TO OUTDOOR LIGHTING
WHEREAS from time to time, amendments to the City ofAuburn zoning
code are appropriate, in order to update and better reflect thecurrent
development needs and standards ofthe City and
WHEREAS, thepurposeof this ordinance is toestablishregulations
which discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourageenergy
rG
conservation and promoteexterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and
pedestrian access to and within a development while minimizingimpacts on
adjacent properties; and
WHEREAS following proper notice, the City of Auburn Planning
Commission held a public hearing on October 18, 2011 on theproposed code
amendments regarding off-street parking and loading, landscaping and
screening, outdoor lighting, and variances; and
WHEREAS, after fullyconsidering the testimony and information
presented at thepublichearing, on October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission
made its recommendations for code amendments to the City of Auburn City
Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Planning
Commission recommendations; and
y
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14, 2011
Page 1 of 6
ORD.D
r
WHEREAS, environmental review onte proposal has been completed in
1
accordance with the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
with a final determination of non-significance (DNS) issued September 15 2011
and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code
amendments weresent to the Washington State Department of Commerce,
Growth Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-
day state review and
WHEREAS, no comments regarding theproposedzoningcode
amendments have been received from the Department of Commerce or other
state agencies; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that theproposed amendments improve
the readability and use of use of the City Code, updates technical aspects of the
code, improves the City's development reviewprocess, and promote
sustainabilityconceptswhere feasible.
NOWTHEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. New Chapter to City Code.That a New Chapter 18.55
tothe Auburn City Code beand the same hereby is created to readas follows:
Chapter.18.55
OUTDOORLIGHTING
Sections
18.55010 Intent
18.55.020 Applicability
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14 2011
Page 2 of 6
ORD.D
18.55.030 Generalrequirements
18.55.040 Prohibited lights
18.55.050 Exceptions
18.55.010 Intent.
To discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy
conservation and promote exterior lighting thatpromotes safe vehicular and pedestrian
access toand within a development whileminimizingimpacts on adjacent properties.
Decorativelighting that is architecturally integratedwith the character of the associated
structures, site design and landscape is encouraged.
18.55.020 Applicability
A. A lighting plan shall be required for projects as follows:
1 When an exterior lighting installation is part of a newdevelopment
proposal requiring site plan review an administrative or conditional use permit, or other
development application that requires outside lighting or is a commercial project
adjacent to property zoned residential; and
2.For projects undergoing redevelopment, expansion orremodel when the
redevelopment requires site plan approval, or fortenantimprovements or other minor
building improvements when exterior lighting is proposed to be installed or modified.
B. These regulations donot apply to subdivisionsor individual dwellingunits,
with the exception of common areas. Examples ofcommon areas include, but are not
limited to, pathways, clubhouses, parking lots and play areas.
C. Theseregulations are not applicableto public rights-of-way
D Theseregulations do not apply to lighting necessary for emergency
equipment and work conducted in the interests of law enforcement or for the safety
health, or welfareof thepublic.
18.55.030 General requirements.
A. ShieldingRequired. Except as otherwise exempt, all outdoor lighting
fixtures shall be constructedwithshielding onall sides. Theoutdoor light source (bulb or
element) shall not be visible at or beyond the property line.
Figure 18.55.030 Examples of light fixtures withshielding on allsides
ti t. • .
y - : air h .c tk .t.
o. . • I t•
B.Fixture heights. Lighting fixtures shall not exceed the following maximumheights:
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14, 2011
Page 3 of 6
ORD.D
Table 18.55.030
Outdoor Lighting Location FixtureHeight
Maximum as measured tothetopof the
fixture from grade)
Within 50'of a residential zonin• district 16-ft
Surface Parking Area
C1 C3, M1 M2, EP 30-ft
All Other districts 24-ft
C Photometric Plan Requirements. A photometric plan shall be prepared
and submittedfor review and approval when required under 18.33.020 Applicability
The required elements of the plan shall be specified in applicationforms to be provided
by the City The photometric planwillbe reviewed to ensurecompliance with the
provisions in this Chapter
D Level of Illumination.
1 Parking lots, driveways, and trash enclosures/areasshall be illuminated with
a minimummaintained one foot-candle oflight andan average not to exceed four foot-
candles of light.
2. Pedestrian walkways shall be illuminated with a minimummaintained one-
half foot-candle of light and an average not to exceed two foot-candlesof light.
3. In order to minimize lightspillage on abuttingresidentialpropertyillumination
measured at the nearest residential structure or rear yard setback line shallnot exceed
one-tenth foot-candle.
E. Accent lighting. Lighting used to accent architectural features,
landscaping or art is permitted to be directed upward, provided that the fixture shall be
located, aimed, or shielded to minimize light spill. No permit is requiredfor this type of
lighting.
F Periods of Illumination
1 All outdoor lighting systems shall be equippedwith automatic switches
conforming to the requirements of Section 1513.6.2 of theWashington EnergyCode.
2. The use ofsensor technologies, timers or other means to activate lighting
during timeswhen it will be needed is encouragedtoconserve energyprovide safety
and promote compatibilitybetween different land uses. Lower lighting levels at off-peak
times are encouraged as a safetymeasure.
3.Howeveroutdoor lightsmay remain on during the required off hours
when:
a.Illuminating flags representing country state, or other civic entity
b.Functioning as security lighting (e.g. illuminating a pathway building
entry etc.)
c.Associated with special events, etc.
18.55.040 Prohibited lights.
The following lights are prohibitedunless a temporary use permit is obtained for
specific eventswith specific times ofoperation:
A. Strobe lights, Search lights, lasersourcelights, orany similar high-
intensity light except foremergency use by police and firepersonnel or at their direction.
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14, 2011
Page 4 of 6
ORD.D
B. Roof-mounted lights exceptforsecuritypurposes with motion detection
and full shielding so that the glare of the light source is not visible from any public right-
of-way or a neighboringresidence.
C Any light that imitatesor causes visualinterference with a traffic signal or
other necessarysafety or emergency light
18.55.050 Exceptions. The following light sources are exempt from the
requirementsof this section.
A. Navigation and airport lighting required for the safe operationof boats and
airplanes.
B. Temporary lights used for holiday decorations
C Emergency lighting required by police, fire, and rescue authorities.
D Lighting for state and federal highways authorized by the Washington
StateDepartment of Transportation.
E. Internallighting ofpermitted signs.
F Outdoor lighting for public monuments.
G. Temporary lighting in use duringactive constructionprojects
H. Stadium and field lighting
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry outthe
directions of thislegislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are
declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of anyclause, sentence,
paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or theinvalidity of the
application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of
the remainder of this ordinance, orthe validity of its application to other persons
or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided bylaw
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14, 2011
Page 5 of 6
ORD.D
INTRODUCED*
PASSED.
APPROVED*
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APP' eVED ' TO FORM:
niel B rT City 'ttorn:
Published:
Ordinance No. 6390
December 14, 2011
Page 6 of 6
ORD.D
ORD.D
ORD.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Title 18 - Zoning, of the
Auburn City Code related to parking and landscaping regulations,
administrative variance process, and outdoor lighting standards (Code
Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: September 27, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: See Exhibit list below.Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to hold a public hearing on the proposed
amendments and make a recommendation to City Council.
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and is progressing in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
The proposed amendments (Phase 2, Group 1) will affect the current zoning code as follows: Amend and
delete existing code sections and add new code sections within the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). Amend Chapter ACC
18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative Appeals) by adding an administrative variance
process. And lastly create a new Chapter of the zoning code related to outdoor lighting.
The October 18, 2011 Planning Commission meeting will involve a public hearing on the proposed code
amendments. The Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council and will make a recommendation
to the City Council on the proposed code amendment.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Staff: Wagner
Meeting Date: October 18, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 2 of 7
A. RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT:
City of Auburn Planning and Development Department, Kevin H. Snyder, AICP, Director
B. RESPONSIBLE STAFF:
Stuart Wagner, AICP Planner, City of Auburn Planning and Development Department
C. AREA OF IMPACT:
Citywide
D. PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING DATE:
October 4, 2011
E. CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION DATE:
Currently scheduled for November 21, 2011
F. FINDINGS OF FACT:
1. Title 18 of the Auburn City Code (ACC), includes Chapter 18.68, Amendments, which
addresses amendments to Title 18, Zoning.
2. The proposed code amendment addresses specific chapters of the zoning code that regulate
non-residential and multi-family developments. This includes amending and deleting existing
code sections together with adding new code sections in the following Chapters: ACC 18.50
(Landscaping and Screening) and ACC 18.52 (Off Street Parking and Loading). The
proposal also amends Chapter 18.70 (Variances, Special Exceptions and Administrative
Appeals) by adding an administrative variance process. Lastly the proposal creates a new
Chapter of the zoning code, ACC 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards, to encourage
appropriate use and design of outdoor lighting in certain zones of the City and encourage
energy conservation.
3. The proposed code amendment is supported by the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan as
discussed under the conclusions’ section of this report.
4. A Determination of Non-Significance was issued for the City initiated Code Amendments on
September 15, 2011 under city file SEP11-0020. The Determination of Non-Significance was
published in the September 15, 2011 edition of the Seattle Times. To date no comments
have been received. The comment period ends September 29, 2011 at 5:00 p.m.
5. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed zoning code amendments outlined in this
agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth
Management Services, and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. An
acknowledgement letter was received on September 21, 2011. No comments were received
from Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report.
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 3 of 7
6. Initial concepts were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee on
February 14, 2011 and May 23, 2011 and the Committee provided initial policy feedback to
staff.
7. The Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed work study session on August 23, 2011
to review and discuss with staff potential amendment issues and ideas inclusive of the
potential amendments to Title 18 (Zoning).
8. The public hearing notice was published on September 23, 2011 in the Seattle Times at least
10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 4, 2011.
9. The following conclusions support the proposed amendments to Title 18, Zoning, scheduled
for the Planning Commission’s October 4, 2011 public hearing with a staff recommendation.
G. Conclusions
1. Pursuant to Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 18.68.030 and 18.68.040, the following public
process is applicable:
18.68.030 Public hearing process
A. Text Amendments. With the exception of purely administrative or procedural
amendments, the planning commission shall conduct at least one public hearing on all
amendments to this title. The planning commission shall make a recommendation to the city
council who may or may not conduct a public hearing.
18.68.040 Public hearing notice requirements
A. Text Amendments.
1. Planning Commission. For text amendments that require a public hearing under ACC
18.68.030(A), notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, at least 10 days prior to the public hearing and by posting the
notice in three general public locations.
2. City Council. Notice of a public hearing shall be given by publication, in a newspaper of
general circulation in the area, prior to the public hearing and by posting the notice in three
general public locations.
Comment:
The public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for October 4, 2011
meeting the requirement under ACC 18.68.030. The public hearing notice was published in
the Seattle Times, the City’s official newspaper, on September 23, 2011 at least 10 days
prior to the public hearing. The public hearing notice was also posted at City Hall (25 West
Main Street), the Customer Service Center (One East Main Street), and on the City’s website
meeting the requirement for posting the notice in three general public locations.
2. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) are intended to reorganize and update
regulations and standards to create a more logical flow in the regulation of land uses and to
appropriately reflect changes in state law. In addition, these amendments are intended to
reduce redundancy and vagueness, add or modify definitions and make the regulations
easier to use and understand.
3. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) do not require any changes to the City’s
current critical area regulations contained in ACC 16.10 (Critical Areas). Any future
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 4 of 7
development subject to the proposed amendments to Title 18 will still be required to
demonstrate compliance to applicable standards and regulation specified in ACC 16.10.
4. The proposed amendments to Title 18 (Zoning) will support current and future land and
shoreline uses that are consistent with the City’s current Comprehensive Plan and current
Shoreline Master Program. Staff has not proposed substantive or non-substantive
amendments to Title 18 that would be deemed inconsistent with the City’s adopted plans and
policies.
5. Auburn City Code Chapter 18.68, Amendments, does not have specific decision criteria for
text amendments to the zoning title. At a minimum, proposed text amendments are to be
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan pursuant to RCW 36.70A.040. The proposed
code amendment is supported by the following Comprehensive Plan Objectives and Policies:
Policy guidance on landscaping
Objective 22.2. To improve the visual quality of new development
Policies
UD-14 Industrial development shall incorporate appropriate landscaping and site
design to minimize its visual impact on surrounding development.
UD-15 The City should require all projects, both public and private, to include
landscaping. Codes and regulations which govern landscaping shall be updated and
revised and include provisions for continued maintenance.
Comment:
The intent of the landscaping and screening chapter is to provide minimum landscaping and
screening requirements in order to enhance the city’s appearance and to visually unify the
city and its neighborhoods. No changes have been made to the intent statement. As stated
in the applicability section, landscaping is required for all uses and activities developed in the
city excluding single-family and duplex units on individual lots. As such the visual quality of
new development will be improved by the requirements found within the landscaping and
screening chapter of Title 18 – Zoning.
Objective 18.5. To recognize the aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation and
to promote its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given to promoting the use
of native vegetation.
Policies
EN-33 The City recognizes the important benefits of native vegetation including its role
in attracting native wildlife, preserving the natural hydrology, and maintaining the natural
character of the Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the use of
pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants that may enter nearby water
systems) and reduce watering required of non-native species (thereby promoting
conservation). The City shall encourage the use of native vegetation as an integral part
of public and private development plans through strategies that include, but are not
limited to, the following:
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 5 of 7
o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes and in public facilities.
o Providing greater clarity in development regulations in how native plants can be used
in private development proposals.
o Pursuing opportunities to educate the public about the benefits of native plants.
EN-33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of native plant materials that
complement the natural character of the Pacific Northwest and which are adaptable to
the climatic hydrological characteristics of the region. Regulations should provide
specificity as to native plant types in order to facilitate their use.
EN-34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary disturbance of natural vegetation in
new development.
EN-35 The City shall encourage the use of water conserving plants in landscaping for
both public and private projects.
EN-36 The City shall update and amend its landscaping ordinances to ensure that
sufficient landscaping is a required component of all development. Emphasis should be
placed on higher quality and quantity of landscaping.
EN-37 The City shall strengthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at protecting
large stands of trees and significant trees within the City.
Comment:
The new landscaping regulations contain provisions on significant tree retention and the
incorporation of native vegetation into the landscape plantings. Significant trees located in
required planter areas (i.e. perimeter areas that abut street and residential properties) now
need to be retained unless determined to be damaged, diseased, or pose a safety hazard
and fifty percent of trees, shrubs, and ground cover shall be native or non-invasive species
that have adapted to the region. The new landscaping regulations also contain a minimum
landscape coverage requirement. This percentage requirement (between 10-20%
depending on zoning district) will ensure that sufficient landscaping is a required component
of all development.
Policy guidance on off-street parking
Objective 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of areas adjacent to heavily traveled
arterials while minimizing land use conflicts:
Policy
LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual commercial enterprises along
commercial arterials to promote the sharing of parking areas, access drives and signs.
Such grouping can be encouraged through land division regulations, sign regulations and
development standards.
Comment:
The comprehensive plan does not contain a lot of policy guidance on off-street parking. The
City however should have regulations in place that provide for safe, attractive, and
convenient off-street parking and that it be compatible with surrounding land uses. The
proposed code amendments to the off-street parking chapter of Title 18 – Zoning accomplish
these goals through the avoidance of large and underutilized parking lots by establishing
parking maximums, increasing the number of shared and reduced parking strategies,
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 6 of 7
allowing for alternative parking lot surfaces, and permitted alternative parking layouts subject
to approval by the planning director. The proposed amendments will bring a more balanced
approach to parking and land use.
Policy guidance on flexibility
Chapter 2 - General Approach to Planning
Predictability in land use regulation fosters confidence in land and improvement
investments (both private development and public facilities), and can have a positive
effect on long term property values. It also fosters fairness and consistency, and eases
administration. It has the disadvantage of not dealing well with changing conditions (e.g.
new manufacturing technologies), unique circumstances or when someone simply
comes forward with a "better" idea. Flexible regulations can deal with such conditions
and circumstances, but may require a large commitment of time, expertise and other
resources to manage. Auburn's policy will be mixed; stressing predictability in single
family neighborhoods, while allowing flexibility in areas committed to industrial or
commercial uses where performance standards are usually more important than specific
use restrictions.
GOAL 2. FLEXIBILITY
To provide predictability in the regulation of land use and development, especially where
residential uses are affected, but to also provide flexibility for development through
performance standards that allow development to occur while still protecting and
enhancing natural resources and critical lands in overall compliance with this
comprehensive plan.
Objective 2.1. To provide assurance that residential areas will be protected from intrusions
by incompatible land uses.
Policies:
GP-11 Ordinance provisions designed to protect residential areas shall give priority to
providing predictability and stability to the neighborhood.
GP-12 Adequate buffering shall be required whenever new commercial or industrial
uses abut areas designated for residential uses.
Objective 2.2. To provide flexibility for major new commercial or industrial developments to
respond to changing market conditions without threatening the purposes of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy:
GP-13 Ordinances regulating developing commercial or industrial areas should be
based on performance standards which provide flexibility to respond to market conditions
while ensuring compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and with present and potential
adjacent uses.
Comments
The proposed code amendments include new provisions that allow for greater flexibility in
landscaping and parking lot design. Modification of the landscaping requirements can be
ORD.D
Agenda Subject: Proposed amendments to Auburn City Code related
to the Code Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1 (ZOA11-0006)
Date: September 27, 2011
Page 7 of 7
achieved through an alternative landscape plan that provide for creative design, or
incorporates an increased retention of significant trees or historical or architectural features
found on a site.
Further, alternative parking layouts can be allowed provided the appropriate number of
parking spaces are provided and vehicles can move in and out in a safe manner and with
minimal disruption of traffic on the adjacent street. Additional flexibility is provided through a
series of shared and reduced parking strategies. Here a reduction in the number of required
parking stalls can be permitted if a development is close to transit, has a low parking
demand, or incorporates bicycle parking and/or car sharing stalls (i.e. zip cars).
Lastly a new administrative variance process has been created where under specific cases
the planning director could grant relief to development standards (up to 25% for variances
related to building setbacks, lot coverage, lot area, and lot width). All of the proposed code
amendments described above provide flexibility for development.
Policy guidance on lighting
Objective 18.7. Enhance and maintain the quality of life for the City's inhabitants by
promoting a healthy environment and reducing the adverse impact of
environmental nuisances.
Policy:
EN-43 The City shall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitants
to excessive levels of light and glare. Performance measures for
light and glare exposure to surrounding development should be
adopted and enforced.
Comment:
As stated in the intent section of the outdoor lighting chapter, new regulations have been
created to discourage excessive lighting of outdoor spaces, encourage energy conservation
and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and pedestrian access to and
within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties. The proposed code
amendments are in accordance with the goals, policies and objectives of the comprehensive
plan.
Staff Recommendation
The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of the proposed zoning code
text amendment as presented by staff based on the findings of fact and conclusions.
Exhibits
Exhibit 1: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.50 – Landscaping and Screening (revised)
Exhibit 2: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.52 – Off-street Parking and Loading (revised)
Exhibit 3: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.70 – Variances, Special Exceptions, and
Administrative Appeals (new section)
Exhibit 4: Auburn City Code Chapter 18.53 – Outdoor Lighting Standards (new chapter)
Exhibit 5: Determination of Non-Significance and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 6: Environmental Checklist
Exhibit 7: Public Hearing Notice and Affidavit of Publication
Exhibit 8: Letter to Department of Commerce for 60-day State Review
Exhibit 9: Acknowledgment letter from Department of Commerce
ORD.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0006, Proposed amendments to Title 18 -
Zoning, of the Auburn City Code related to outdoor lighting. (Code
Update Project – Phase 2 - Grouping 1).
Date: December 19, 2011
Department: Planning and
Development
Attachments: Ordinance No. 6390, staff
report to Planning Commission (includes
SEPA DNS)
Budget Impact: N/A
Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6390.
Background Summary:
The Code Update Project began in September 2008 and has progressed in two phases. Phase 1,
completed in June of 2009, updated the City’s residential-related zoning districts (Title 18 ACC) and
subdivision code (Title 17 ACC). Phase 2 updates the City’s non-residential related zoning districts (Title
18 ACC) and chapters that regulate non-residential and multi-family developments such as off-street
parking and landscaping.
The Code Update Project is intended to meet four key objectives:
* Improve development code readability and ease of use; and
* Update technical content to address known issue areas and better support the City’s development
review and quasi-judicial decision process; and
* Ensure development code and design standards are coordinated and consistent with Auburn’s
Comprehensive Plan and other state land use and environmental requirements; and
* Promote sustainability concepts where feasible.
Ordinance 6390 will create a new Chapter 18.55 (Outdoor Lighting) of the Auburn City Code (ACC). The
the purpose of this ordinance is to establish regulations which discourage excessive lighting of outdoor
spaces, encourage energy conservation and promote exterior lighting that promotes safe vehicular and
pedestrian access to and within a development while minimizing impacts on adjacent properties.
On October 18, 2011 the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed code amendments.
At the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council
for adoption of the proposed code amendments. Since the public hearing, the code amendments have
been reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee and the Public Works
Committee. Both Committees were satisfied with the amendments proposed and recommend approval to
the City Council.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Information Services
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: December 19, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6393
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Agenda Bill
Ordinance No. 6393
Comparison Table
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6393.
Background Summary:
See attached.
F4.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Planning And Community Development
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.E
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: ZOA11-0008; Ordinance No. 6393 related to school
district impact fees
Date:
December 13, 2011
Department:
Planning & Development Dept.
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6393
School impact Fee Proposal Table
Budget Impact:
$
Administrative Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6393
Background Summary:
City’s Annual Review
Title 19 (Impact Fees) of the Auburn City Code contains standards and regulations pertaining to the
imposition of impact fees in the City of Auburn. Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) addresses the
establishment, calculation, collection and amendment of school impact fees within the municipal
boundaries of the City of Auburn. Four school districts occur (at least in part) within the City limits.
Pursuant to Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code, on at least an annual
basis, the Auburn City Council shall review the information submitted by the Districts pursuant to ACC
19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the
city's comprehensive plan. The City Council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the
amount of the impact fees is necessary.
Relationship to District’s Capital Facilities Plans
The City of Auburn annual Comprehensive Plan Amendm ent process for 2011 included requests for City
approval of the Capital Facilities Plans of the four districts as follows:
* 2011 - 2017 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan;
* 2012-2017 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan;
* 2012 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan; and
* 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan.
These requests were submitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.02.050 (Submission of
District Capital Facilities Plan and Data) of the Auburn City Code.
The School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans are contained in the previously provided working notebook
(three ring binder) associated with the 2011 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Additional copies
of the School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans are available from the Planning and Development
Department, upon request. The Auburn City Council considered and approved incorporating the School
Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans into the Comprehensive Plan at the regular council meeting on
December 5, 2011 by Ordinance No. 6394.
Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions:
Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O
Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor
Hearing Examiner Municipal Serv. Finance Parks
Human Services Planning & CD Fire Planning
Park Board Public Works Legal Police
Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources
Action:
Committee Approval: Yes No
Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____
Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____
Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____
Councilmember: Norman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: : December 19, 2011 Item Number:
ORD.E
Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6393
Date: December 13, 2011
Page 2 of 2
The approved Capital Facilities Plans contain proposed school impact fees for each of the Districts. The
setting of the actual fees occurs through separate Council action amending Chapter 19.02 of the Auburn
City Code. Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review ) which specifies the following:
On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant
to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element
of the city's comprehensive plan. The city council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the
amount of the impact fees is necessary; provided, that any school impact fee adjustment that would
increase the school impact fee shall require the submittal of a written request for the adjustment by the
applicable school district concurrent with the submittal of the annual capital facilities plan pursuant to ACC
19.02.050. In making its decision to adjust impact fees, the city council will take into consideration the
quality and completeness of the information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan
and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan.
Section 19.02.060 establishes that the Auburn City Council is not obligated to accept the fees proposed
by the School Districts within their submitted Capital Facilities Plans and may establish fees that the
Council determines are more appropriate and consistent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitigating
school impacts within the affected portion of the City.
Committee Actions
An introductory discussion of the school impact fee changes occurred at the PCD Committee’s regular
meeting on November 28, 2011. For this meeting, the Dieringer School District provided a letter
requesting their impact fee for Single Family Residential be increased from $3,005 to $3,500. The
committee discussion was amenable to the change. The PCD Committee also requested a future code
change to establish a deadline for submission of fee increase requests. At their December 12, 2011
meeting, the Planning and Community Development Com mittee (PCDC) discussed Ordinance No. 6393
and forwarded a recommendation for approval to the full City Council.
The Finance Committee is discussing school impact fees at their regular meeting on December 19, 2011.
ORD.E
ORDINANCE NO. 6 393
AN ORDINANCE OF THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTONAMENDING SECTIONS
19.02.115 19.02.120 19.02.130 -AND 19 02.140 OF THE
AUBURNCITY CODE RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACTS
FEES
WHEREAS the City of Auburn has adopted a schoolimpactfee ordinance and
collects schoolimpactfees on behalf of certain school districts located or located in part
within the City of Auburn; and
WHEREAS, theAuburnSchoolDistrict, Dieringer SchoolDistrict, Federal Way
SchoolDistrict, and the KentSchool District, each being located in part withinthe City of
Auburn, have providedthe City of Auburn withupdated capital facilities plans to be
considered duringthe City's 2011 annual comprehensive plan amendment process that
addresses among other things, theappropriateschool impact fee for single family
residential dwellings and multi- familyresidentialdwellings for each district; and
WHEREAS, the Auburn School District issued a Determination of Non-
Significance for the 2011 2017 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan April 22,
2011 the Dieringer School Districtissued'a Determination of Non- Significance for the
2012-2017Dieringer School District CapitalFacilities Plan July 8, 2011 the Federal
Way School District .issued a Determinationof Non-Significance for the 2012 Federal
WaySchoolDistrict CapitalFacilities Plan April 23, 2011and the Kent School District
issued a Determination of Non-Significancefor the 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Kent
School District CapitalFacilities Plan June 7 2011and
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 1 of 7
ORD.E
WHEREAS the City of Auburn issued a.Determination of Non-Significance (DNS)
on October 3, 2011 for the City of Auburn Year 2011 city-initiated comprehensive plan
map and text amendments (File No. SEP11-0021) that incorporated by reference the
previous threshold determinations by theAuburnSchool, Dieringer SchoolDistrict,
Federal Way School District and the Kent School District, and
WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least
ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, theAuburn Planning Commission on October
18, 2011 conductedpublichearings on the proposed Auburn School District 2011 2017
CapitalFacilities Plan, the proposed DieringerSchool District 2012 2017 Capital
Facilities Plan; theproposed Federal Way School District2012 Capital Facilities Plan;
and for theproposed Kent SchoolDistrict 2011-2012 through 2016-2017 Capital
Facilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, following the conclusion ofthepublichearing on October 18 2011
and subsequentdeliberations, theAuburn Planning Commission, following individual
positive motions, made separate recommendations to theAuburn City Council on the
approval of the Auburn School District 2011-2017CapitalFacilities Plan, theDieringer
SchoolDistrict20122017 CapitalFacilities Plan; the Federal Way SchoolDistrict 2012
CapitalFacilities Plan; and for the Kent SchoolDistrict 2011-2012 through 2016-2017
CapitalFacilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, theAuburn City Council considered the recommendations of the
Auburn Planning Commission at a regularlyscheduled meeting on December 5 2011
and a positivemotion approved the Auburn School District 2011-2017CapitalFacilities
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 2 of 7
ORD.E
Plan, the Dieringer SchoolDistrict2012 2017 CapitalFacilities Plan; the Federal Way
SchoolDistrict 2012 CapitalFacilities Plan; and the Kent SchoolDistrict 2011-2012
through 2016-2017CapitalFacilities Plan; and
WHEREAS, on December 5 2011 thePublic Works Committee of the Auburn
City Councilat a regularly scheduled meetingreviewed the Planning Commission's
recommendations; and
WHEREAS, on December 12, 2011 thePlanning and Community Development
Committee of theAuburn City Council at a regularly scheduled meeting recommended
to theAuburn City Council theapproval of amendments to Title 19 (Impact Fees) and
more specifically Chapter 19 02 (School Impact Fees) pertaining to school impactfees
for single family residentialdwelling units and multi-familydwelling units to be applied in
the City of Auburn for theAuburn School District; Dieringer School District, Federal Way
School District, and the Kent SchoolDistrict; respectively based on the aforementioned
capital facilities plans for eachof these districts; and
WHEREAS, theAuburn CityCode provides for adjustments toschool impacts
fees based on a review of the capital facilities plans for the districts; and
WHEREAS, Section 19 02.060 (AnnualCouncilReview) oftheAuburn CityCode
specifiesthat the Auburn City Council will in making its decision to adjust impact fees
take into consideration the quality and completeness of theinformation provided in the
applicable school districtcapitalfacilities plan andmay decide to enact a fee less than
the amount supported by the capitalfacilities plan; and
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 3 of 7
ORD.E
J
WHEREAS, on December 19 2011 the Auburn City Council considered the
recommendation of the Planning and Community DevelopmentCommittee of the City
Council at a regularly scheduled meeting on December 12, 2011
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAINAS FOLLOWS:
Section 1 Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.115 of the Auburn City
Code is hereby amendedto read as follows.
19 02.115 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Dieringer School
District.
Theimpact fee calculation and schedulebelow is basedupon a
review of the impact fee calculation for single-familyresidences and for
multifamilyresidences setforth in the most recent version oftheDieringer
SchoolDistrict CapitalFacilities Plan adoptedby theAuburn city council
as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. Thecalculation is the
determination of the appropriateproportionate share of the costs of public
schoolcapitalfacilities needed to seive.new growth and development to
be funded by schoolimpact fees based on the factors defined in ACC
19 02.020
Effective January 1 2011 2012, theschool impact fee shallbe as
follows:
Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $3,005.00$3,500.00
Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit 0.00
Ord. 6279 § 1 2009. Ord. 6214 § 1 2008; Ord. 6134 § 1 2007 Ord.
6060 § 1 2006 Ord. 5950 § 2, 2005.)
Section 2. Amendmentto the City Code. Section 19.02.120 of the Auburn City
Code is hereby amended to read as follows.
19 02.120 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Auburn School
District.
Theimpact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of
the impact feecalculation for single-familyresidences and for multifamily
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 4 of 7
ORD.E
Q
1
ti
residences set forth in themostrecent version of the Auburn School
District's Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an
element of the Auburncomprehensive plan. The calculation is the
determination of the appropriate proportionate shareofthecosts of public
school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to
be funded by schoolimpact fees based on the factors defined in ACC
19 02.020
EffectiveJanuary 1 2011 2012, theschoolimpactfee shall be as
follows:
Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,266.33 $5,557.30
Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit 1,518.22 $2,305.22
Ord. 6279 § 2, 2009' Ord. 6214 § 2, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 2, 2007 Ord.
6060 § 2, 2006 Ord. 5950 § 1 2005 Ord. 5793 § 1 2003; Ord. 5232 § 1
1999.)
Section 3. Amendmentto the City Code. Section 19 02.130 is hereby
amended as follows.
19.02.130 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the KentSchool
District.
The impactfee calculation and schedule is basedupon a review of
theimpactfee and calculation forsingle-family residences and for
multifamily residences set forth in themostrecent, version ofthe Kent
School District's CapitalFacilities Plan adopted by theAuburn city council
as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The-calculation is the
determination of the appropriate proportionate shareofthe costs of public
schoolcapitalfacilities needed to serve newgrowth and development to
be funded by school impactfees based on the factors defined in ACC
19 02.020
EffectiveJanuary 1 2011 2012, the school impactfee shallbe as
follows:
Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,486.00
Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit 3,378.00
Ord. 6279 § 3 2009. Ord. 6214 § 3, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 3, 2007 Ord.
6060 § 3, 2006 Ord. 5950 § 1 2005 Ord. 5233 § 1 1999.)
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 5 of 7
ORD.E
Section 4. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.140 of theAuburn City
Code is hereby amended to read as follows.
19 02.140 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Federal Way
SchoolDistrict.
The impact feecalculation and schedule is based upon a review of
the impact fee and calculation for single-familyresidences and for
multifamilyresidences set forth in the most recent version of the Federal
Way SchoolDistrict's CapitalFacilities Plan adopted by theAuburn city
council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation
is thedetermination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of
publicschoolcapitalfacilities needed to serve new growth and
development to be funded by school impactfeesbased on the factors
defined in ACC 19.02.020
EffectiveJanuary 1 2011 2012, the schoolimpact fee shall be as
follows:
Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $4 014 00
Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $2,172:00 $1,253.00
Ord. 6279 § 4 2009' Ord. 6214 § 4 2008; Ord. 6134 § 4 2007 Ord.
6060 § 4 2006' Ord. 6042 § 1 2006:)
Section 5. Constitutionality and Invalidity If anysection, subsection sentence,
clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held invalid or
unconstitutional by any Court of competentjurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision, andsuch holding shall notaffectthe
validity oftheremainingportions thereof.
Section 6. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such
administrative procedures• as may be necessary tocarryoutthe directions of this
legislation.
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 6 of 7
ORD.E
Section"? Effective Date. This POrdinance shall take effect and be in force five
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law
INTRODUCED'
PASSED.
APPROVED.
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APP • ED AS TO FORM:
L1k L
aniel B. - d; CityAttorney
Published:
Ordinance No. 6393
December 14, 2011
Page 7 of 7
ORD.E
School Impact Fee Proposal
(Effective Year 2012)
School
District Multiple Family Single Family
Past 2011
fee, Per
ACC 19.02
CFP says: Requested
Amount
Change? Past 2011
fee, Per
ACC 19.02
CFP says: Requested
Amount
Change?
Auburn $1,518.22 $2,305.22
page 27
$2,305.22 Increase
of
$787.00
$5,266.33 $5,557.30
page 27
$5,557.30 Increase
of
$290.97
Dieringer $0.00 ($1,304.00)
Page 14
$0.00 No
Change
$3,005.00
*
$5,681.00
Page 14
$3,500.00 Increase
of
$495.00
Federal
Way
$2,172.00 $1,253.00
Page 30 &
33
$1,253.00
Decrease
of
$919.00
$4,014.00 $4,014.00
Page 30 &
33
$4,014.00 No
Change
Kent $3,378.00 $3,378.00
Page 30 &
31
$3,378.00 No
Change
$5,486.00 $5,486.00
Page 29 &
31
$5,486.00 No
Change
CFP = Capital Facilities Plan
* The codified and on-line city code currently lists the Dieringer School District SF dwelling unit school impact fee as $3,500.
However this is due to a scribner’s error since Ordinance No. 6340, updating the fees and adopted December 20, 2010, continued to
reflect Dieringer School District SF dwelling unit school impact fee as $3,005 (unchanged) effective 1-1-11. On 11-28-11 Dieringer
School District requested by letter an increase from $3,005 to $3,500.
ORD.E
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6395
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6395
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6395.
Background Summary:
Ordinance No. 6395 corrects language in Ordinance No. 6367 pertaining to the rates for
residential 35-gallon garbage service in 2012 and 2013. The rate for residential 35-
gallon service in 2012 should be $13.67 and the rate in 2013 should be $14.22.
O4.7, F4.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:ORD.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDORD.F
ORDINANCE NO. 63 9 5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON; CORRECTING
LANGUAGE IN ORDINANCE NO 6367 AMENDING
SECTION 8.08.180A OF THE AUBURNCITY CODE
RELATINGTO RESIDENTIALGARBAGE AND
RECYCLING SERVICE CHARGES
WHEREAS, the City provides for refuse and garbage services; and
WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance 6367 settingforth solid waste
rates; and,
WHEREAS, one of the codified rates didnot properlyreflect the intended
changes.
NOWTHEREFORE, THECITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. Correction of Earlier Ordinance. The codified monthly
charge in Section 8.08.180A for Residential Garbage and Recycling, one 35-
galloncart, one pickup per week, currently states the 2012 charge as $16.81
and the 2013 charge as $17 48. These servicecharges werereflected in
Ordinance 6367 without being shown asan,additionby strike-out and underline.
Therefore, the legally effective rate for all threeyears would be $12.75. It is the
intent ofthe City Council to correct this error by increasingthe service charges,
consistent with the changes to the other service charges, asfollows: effective
January 1 2012, the current charge of $12.75 shallbe increased to $13 67 and
effective January 1 2013, the chargeof$13.67shallbe increased to $14.22.
Ordinance No. 6395
November 22, 2011
Page 1 of 4
4
ORD.F
Section 2;
4.
Amendment to City.Code. That, effectiveJanuary 1 2012,
the subsection of Section 9 of Ordinance6367 and Section 8.68.180A of the
Auburn City Coderelatedtoresidential garbage andrecycling service charges be
and the samehereby is amendedto read as follows:
8.08.180 Collectioncharges—Residential and commercial collections.
A.Services and charges herein shallbecome effective for each account on January 1
2012. Upon this date, servicesshall be provided at the 35-gallon canservice rate unless the
finance department is notified otherwise by the tenant or property owner Likewise, unless the
finance department is otherwise notified, services will automaticallyrevert to the 35-galloncan
service rate upon a change in property tenancy or ownership. Rates to be charged by the city for
solid waste services shall be'as follows:
Type of Service Monthly Charge
Residential Garbage and Recycling
One 10-gallon micro-can, one pickup perweek 5.30
One 20-gallon mini-cart, one pickup per week 10.77
One 35-gallon cart, one pickup per week 42. 6 $13.67
One 64-gallon cart, one pickup per week 30.21
One 96-gallon cart, one pickup per week 42.10
Each extra container of up to 32 gallons, per pickup 10.83
Section 3. Amendment to City Code. That, effective January 1 2013
the subsection of Section 10 of Ordinance 6367 and Section 8.08.180A of the
Auburn CityCoderelated to residentialgarbage and recyclingservicecharges be
and the same hereby isiamendedto read as follows:
8.08:180 Collection charges—Residential and commercial collections.
A.Services and charges hereinshall becomeeffective for each account on January 1
2013. Uponthis date, services shall be provided at the 35-gallon can service rate unless the
financedepartment is notified otherwise by the tenant or property owner Likewise, unless,the
financedepartment is otherwise notified, serviceswillautomatically revert to the 35-gallon can
Ordinance No. 6395
November 22, 2011
Page 2 of 4
ORD.F
service rateupon a change in property tenancyor ownership. Rates to be charged by the city for
solid wasteservices shall be as follows:
Type of Service Monthly Charge
Residential Garbageand Recycling
One 10-gallon micro-can, one pickup per week 5.51
One 20-gallon mini-can, one pickup per week 11.20
One 35-gallon cart, one pickup per week 4.&62 $14.22
One 64-gallon cart, one pickup per week 31 42
One 96-galloncart, one pickup per week 43.79
Each extra container of up to 32 gallons, per pickup 11.26
Section 4. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrativeprocedures as may be necessary to carryoutthe
directions of thislegislation.
Section 5. Interpretation and Severability. This ordinance shall be
read together with Ordinance 6367 in such a manner that full effect shall begiven
to both ordinances. The changes indicated by double strike-out and double
underline are intendedtoamend the applicable provisionsof Ordinance 6367 as
well as the applicableportions of Chapter 8.08 ofthe City Code. All other
provisions of Ordinance 6367 remain in effect without regard tothe strike-out and
underlinescontained in this ordinance. The CityClerk and/or code reviser shall
be authorized to make appropriatechanges to the CityCode to effect the
changesexpressed herein.
Theprovisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and
severable. Theinvalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section or portion of this ordinance, ortheinvalidityoftheapplication thereof to
Ordinance No. 6395
November 22, 2011
Page 3 of 4
ORD.F
any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this
ordinance, orthe validity of its application to other personsor circumstances.
Section 6. Effective.date.This Ordinance shall take effect and be
in force fivedays from and after its passage, approval and publication as
provided by law
INTRODUCED'
PASSED*
APPROVED'
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ale
Daniel B. Hei', ity Attorney
Published:
Ordinance No. 6395
November 22, 2011
Page 4 of 4
ORD.F
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4770
Date:
December 6, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4770
2012-2017 Transportation Improvement
Program
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4770.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 4770 adopting the revised and extended City of Auburn's 2012-2017
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
Pursuant to RCW 35.77.010 the City of Auburn is required to annually prepare and
adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for each ensuing six
calendar years. The TIP is the detailed programming document for transportation
improvements over a six year period. The plan is intended to ensure that the City will
have available advance plans as a guide in carrying out a coordinated street
construction program.
The City Council is required to conduct a public hearing to review the work accomplished
under the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program, and to adopt a revised and
extended plan.
O4.9.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Norman Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:RES.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A
aL
RESOLUTION NO 4 770
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2012-2017
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO THE LAWSOF THESTATE OF
WASHINGTON AND CHAPTER 35.77 R.0 W
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77 010 requiresthat the legislativebody of eachCity
prepare and adopt a comprehensiveTransportation Improvement Program (TIP)
for the ensuing six years, butonly afterconducting a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a publichearing to review the 2012-2017 Transportation
Improvement Program for the City of Auburnwas held on December 19th, 2011
at thehour of 7 30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of theAuburn City Hall,
pursuant to notice published in the legal newspaper of the City of Auburn on
December 6 2011
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN
WASHINGTON, HEREBYRESOLVES as follows:
Section 1 There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit A, the
terms of which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully set forth, a
designation of the streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be
improved in the mannertherein set forth duringthe year set for the improvement
of such street or streets.
Section 2. Thatthe City Engineer ofthe City of Auburn is hereby directed
to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department
Resolution No. 4770
December 13, 2011
Page 1
RES.A
of Transportation for filing not more than thirty (30) days after theadoption of this
Resolution.
Section 3. That theMayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carryoutthe directions of this
legislation.
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
DATED this dayof December 2011
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
tilt4catia
Orniel B: Reid;
City Attorney
Resolution No. 4770
December 13, 2011
Page 2
RES.A
TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn IImmpprroovveemmeenntt PPrrooggrraamm
22001122--22001177
RES.A
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
TTrraannssppoorrttaattiioonn IImmpprroovveemmeenntt
PPrrooggrraamm
22001122--22001177
Approved by Auburn City Council
December 19, 2011
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001
(253)-931-3010
www.auburnwa.gov
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
ii
Cover Photos: Top right is 8th St NE & R St NE Traffic Signal; bottom left is A ST NW Phase 1.
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Resolution 4770 iii
RESOLUTION NO. 4770
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2012-2017 TRANSPORTATION
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO R.C.W.
CHAPTER 35.77 OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City prepare and
adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for the ensuing six years,
but only after conducting a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement
Program for the City of Auburn was held on December 19, 2011 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant to notice published in the legal newspaper
of the City of Auburn on November 28, 2011; and
WHEREAS, said amendment to the 2012-2017 Transportation Improvement Plan of the
City of Auburn was approved by the City Council by motion duly made and carried in said
hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit “A,” the terms of
which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully set forth, a designation of the
streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be improved in the manner therein
set forth during the year set for the improvement of such street or streets.
Section 2. That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is hereby directed to forward a
certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department of Transportation for filing
not more than thirty (30) days after the adoption of this Resolution.
Section 3. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation.
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and
signatures hereon.
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Resolution 4770 iv
DATED this ___ day of December, 2011
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
v
Transportation Improvement Program
2012-2017
Table of Contents
Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................1
Introduction...............................................................................................................................................1
Projects & Financing Plan Summary.....................................................................................................3
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary..................................................................................13
Roadway Improvement Projects...........................................................................................................15
A Street NW, Phase 1...........................................................................................................................15
AWS Ped Improvements Dogwood to Fir............................................................................................16
Auburn Way Corridor Imp....................................................................................................................17
I Street NE Corridor..............................................................................................................................18
M Street Grade Separation....................................................................................................................19
South 277th Street.................................................................................................................................20
15th Street SW Reconstruction.............................................................................................................21
A Street NW, Phase 2...........................................................................................................................22
D Street NW..........................................................................................................................................23
F Street SE............................................................................................................................................24
M Street NE..........................................................................................................................................25
BNSF Railyard Grade Crossing............................................................................................................26
West Valley Highway Imp....................................................................................................................27
8th Street NE Widening........................................................................................................................28
49th Street NE.......................................................................................................................................29
Traffic Calming Improvements.............................................................................................................30
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 3....................................................................................................31
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 1....................................................................................................32
124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. Phase 2....................................................................................................33
SE 320th Street Corridor Imp...............................................................................................................34
Downtown Promenade Imp..................................................................................................................35
Downtown Pedestrian Lighting............................................................................................................36
AWS Corridor Improvements Fir to Hemlock.....................................................................................37
M ST SE Corridor.................................................................................................................................38
Auburn Way South Bypass...................................................................................................................39
Auburn Way South Streetscape............................................................................................................40
Lea Hill Rd Segment 1..........................................................................................................................41
Lea Hill Rd Segment 2..........................................................................................................................42
Lea Hill Rd Segment 3..........................................................................................................................43
Intersection Improvement Projects.......................................................................................................45
Harvey Rd. & 8th Street NE Imp..........................................................................................................45
8th Street NE & R ST NE (104th Ave SE U-turn)................................................................................46
Auburn Way North & 1st Street NE.....................................................................................................47
Auburn Way South & M Street SE.......................................................................................................48
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
vi
Table of Contents (cont.)
C Street NW & West Main Street.........................................................................................................49
F Street SE & 4th Street SE..................................................................................................................50
Railroad Crossing Imp..........................................................................................................................51
Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Dr SE...............................................................................................52
29th St SE & R St SE.............................................................................................................................53
Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Projects...........................................................55
Traffic Signal Improvements................................................................................................................55
ITS Dynamic Message Signs................................................................................................................56
East Valley HWY ITS Expansion.........................................................................................................57
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects...............................................................................59
BNSF/ East Valley HWY Ped. Underpass...........................................................................................59
Academy Drive Class 1 Trail................................................................................................................60
Metro Shuttles.......................................................................................................................................61
Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program................................................................................................62
Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Imp............................................................................................63
Citywide Sidewalk Improvements........................................................................................................64
A St NE Ped. Imp..................................................................................................................................65
Interurban Trailhead Imp......................................................................................................................66
Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements.....................................................................................67
Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous Projects............................................................................69
Mohawk Plastics Site Mitigation..........................................................................................................69
41st Street SE & A St SE Access Study...............................................................................................70
S 277th St Wetland Mitigation..............................................................................................................71
104th Ave SE & Green River Rd Study...............................................................................................72
Environmental Park Study....................................................................................................................73
Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Study....................................................................................74
S 316th Bike and Ped Study..................................................................................................................75
Kersey Way SE Study...........................................................................................................................76
Mary Olson Farm Imp..........................................................................................................................77
Roadway Preservation Projects.............................................................................................................79
Annual Bridge Preservation Project......................................................................................................79
Annual Arterial Street Preservation......................................................................................................80
Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program....................................................................................................81
Local Street Imp. Program (SOS).........................................................................................................82
Project Summary Spreadsheet .…………………………….……………………………….Appendix A
2012-2017 TIP Project Map…..…………..………………………………………………….Appendix B
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary & Introduction 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 6-year plan (2012-2017) for transportation
improvements that supports the City of Auburns current and future growth. The TIP along with the
Comprehensive Transportation plan serve as source documents for the City of Auburn Capital Facilities
Plan which is a Comprehensive Plan element required by Washington’s Growth Management Act. The
program may be revised at any time by a majority of the City Council after a public hearing. The 2012-
2017 TIP recognizes approximately $217 million worth of transportation improvements (including Non-
Motorized and roadway preservation) over the next six years.
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The purpose of the TIP is to identify priority transportation projects and assure that the city has
advanced plans as a guide in carrying out a coordinated transportation program. There are always more
projects than available revenues. Therefore, a primary objective of the TIP is to integrate the two to
produce a comprehensive, realistic program for the orderly development and maintenance of our street
system. Projects are required to be included in the TIP in order to be eligible for state and federal grants.
Grant funding for projects listed may not yet be secured.
Statutory Requirements
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program - RCW 35.77.010 requires that each city prepare and
adopt a comprehensive transportation improvement program for the ensuing six calendar years
consistent with its Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This six-year Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) shall be filed with the Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation
(WSDOT) each year within 30 days of adoption.
Projects of Regional Significance - RCW 35.77.010 also requires each city to specifically set forth those
projects and programs of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation improvement program
for that region. The 2012-2017 TIP includes nine projects of regional significance:
TIP Project Number Project Title
TIP #1 A St NW, Phase 1
TIP #4 I St NE Corridor
TIP #5 M Street Grade Separation
TIP # 6 S 277th St Widening
TIP #14 West Valley Highway Improvements
TIP #50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs
TIP #51 East Valley Highway ITS Expansion
TIP #58 AWS Corridor Improvements
TIP #61 Auburn Way South Bypass
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary & Introduction 2
Methodology
Annual updates of the TIP begins with developing a revenue forecast to provide a reasonable estimate of
funding available to accomplish the transportation improvement needs. Since the desire to construct
transportation improvements typically exceeds the available forecast revenue, it is necessary to establish
some method of prioritizing the needs.
Transportation needs are identified by examining the latest information concerning level of service,
safety and accident history, growth trends, traffic studies and the City’s adopted Comprehensive
Transportation Plan. The likelihood of receiving federal or state grants for various improvements,
community interests and values are also considered. All of these factors yield a prioritized list of
transportation improvements.
Projects are placed into one of the following categories; Roadway Improvements, Intersection
Improvements, Signal & Intelligent Transportation System Improvements, Non-Motorized & Transit
Improvements, Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous projects and Roadway Preservation Projects.
Each project is identified as a Capacity or Non-capacity improvement and those that lay within the limits
of a defined Arterial LOS Corridor per with Table 2-2 of the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan
are identified accordingly.
Detailed project costs and funding sources are identified and provided for each project listed in the
proposed TIP. The prioritized list is then financially constrained in the first three years to reflect the
financial projections to yield the six-year Transportation Improvement Program. After completing all
reviews and compiling the document staff makes final recommendations to the Planning and
Community Development Committee and City Council for approval.
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 3
Projects & Financing Plan Summary
201220132014201520162017Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects
1 'A' Street NW, Phase 1 ($4.1 Million Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs1,687,500 25,000 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue18,500 - - 150,000 - - 168,500
Grants785,000 - - - - - 785,000
Traffic Impact Fees684,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 934,000
Other (Development)200,000 - - - - - 200,000
2Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to Fir ($50 K Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs106,500 784,300 - - - - 890,800
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue46,500 43,500 - - - - 90,000
Grants60,000 740,800 - - - - 800,800
Other Sources- - - - - - -
3Auburn Way Corridor Improvements (4th St NE to 4th St SE)
Capital Costs- - - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 110,000 600,000 710,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - - - - -
4 'I' Street NE Corridor ($12,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs259,300 - - - - 6,760,000 7,019,300
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue259,300 - - - - - 259,300
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000 5,760,000
5 'M' Street Grade Separation ($6,998,500 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs7,549,735 8,684,828 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants4,791,535 4,208,465 - - - - 9,000,000
REET2- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees661,400 - 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 1,143,400
Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - -
PWTF Loan- 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963
Other (Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - - 3,346,200
6South 277th - Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge ($19,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs150,000 - - - - 4,500,000 4,650,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue150,000 - - - - - 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000
715th St SW Reconstruction
Capital Costs- - - - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 75,000 500,000 575,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000
REET - - - - - - -
8 A Street NW, Phase 2
Capital Costs:- - - 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 150,000 - - 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000
REET - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (Developement)- - - - - - -
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 4
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)
9D Street NW, 37th to 44th ($6 Million beyond 2017)
Capital Costs- - - - - 300,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants - - - 250,000 250,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 50,000 50,000
10 F Street SE, 4th to AWS ($8,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs- - 250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000
REET - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
11M Street NE, E. Main to 4th
Capital Costs- 50,000 275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - 225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000
Traffic Impact Fees- 50,000 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000
12 Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard ($31 Million beyond 2017)
Capital Costs- - - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Grants - - - 125,000 - - 125,000
Other (Development)- - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
14West Valley Hwy Improvements ($2,270,000 Expended Prior to 2011)
Capital Costs5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grants - - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
158th Street NE Widening (Pike Street to R Street NE)
Capital Costs- - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 360,000800,000- - 1,160,000
REET - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
16 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street NE
Capital Costs- - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - -
REET - - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds- - - - - - -
Other (Development)- - - 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000
33Traffic Calming Improvements
Capital Costs200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 5
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)
39 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3
Capital Costs- - - - 100,000 750,000 850,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 85,000 650,000 735,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 15,000 100,000 115,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
40 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1
Capital Costs50,000 150,000 1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000
Traffic Impact Fees50,000 25,000 185,000 - - - 260,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
41124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2
Capital Costs- 30,000 150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 100,000 865,000 - - 965,000
Traffic Impact Fees- 30,000 50,000 135,000 - - 215,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
42 SE 320th St Corridor Improvements
Capital Costs- - 30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 51,500 502,100 - 553,600
Traffic Impact Fees- - 30,000 8,500 77,900 - 116,400
Other Sources- - - - - - -
52 Downtown Promenade Improvements
Capital Costs145,000 - - - - - 145,000
Funding Sources:
Grants (Federal)55,100 - - - - - 55,100
REET1 - - - - - - -
Other (GO Bonds)89,900 - - - - - 89,900
57Downtown Pedestrian Lighting
Capital Costs39,500 - - - - - 39,500
Funding Sources:
Grants (Federal)- - - - - - -
REET1 - - - - - - -
Other (GO Bonds)39,500 - - - - - 39,500
58Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements Fir to Hemlock($296,300 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs2,736,700 - - - - - 2,736,700
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants2,189,400 - - - - - 2,189,400
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (Muckleshoot)547,300 - - - - - 547,300
60 M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)
Capital Costs- - - 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 234,000 234,000 - 468,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 397,800 3,247,800 - 3,645,600
Traffic Impact Fees- - - 1,263,600 1,263,600 - 2,527,200
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - - - -
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Roadway Improvement Projects (Cont.)
61Auburn Way South Bypass ($27,550,000 Expenditures Beyond 2017)
Capital Costs- - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 60,450,000 60,450,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - - - -
62Auburn Way South Streetscape Improvements
Capital Costs- - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 400,000 400,000 800,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 1,200,000 2,050,000 3,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - 350,000 350,000 700,000
64 Lea Hill Road Segment 1 (8th St NE from R St NE to 104th Ave SE)
Capital Costs- - - - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 300,000 1,250,000 1,550,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 5,500,000 3,750,000 9,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - 450,000 12,200,000 12,650,000
65 Lea Hill Segment 2 (104th Ave SE to 112th Ave SE )
Capital Costs- - - - - 11,400,000 11,400,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,000,000 9,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,400,000 2,400,000
Other Sources - - - - - - -
66Lea Hill Segment 3 (SE 312th St from 112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE )
Capital Costs- - - - - 3,575,000 3,575,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 250,000 250,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,100,000 2,100,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 700,000 700,000
REET2 - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - - 525,000 525,000
Subtotal, Roadway Improvement Projects:
Capital Costs 12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue479,300 43,500 - 534,000 1,119,000 3,000,000 5,175,800
Grants7,881,035 5,074,265 2,450,000 5,239,300 11,543,600 89,150,000 121,338,200
Traffic Impact Fees1,395,400 130,000 600,500 2,277,600 1,502,000 4,645,500 10,551,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - - - -
PWTF - 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963
REET2 - - - - - -
Other (Muckleshoot Tribe)547,300 - - - - - 547,300
Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Other (Other Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - - 3,346,200
Other (GO Bonds)129,400 - - - - - 129,400
Other (Development)200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000 12,810,000
Other Sources- - - - 800,000 13,075,000 13,875,000
Total Funding12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 7
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Intersection Improvement Projects
17Harvey Road & 8th St NE Imp. (1,906,600 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs87,300 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (Fed, State, Local)- - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees87,300 86,900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500
Other (Redlex)- - - - - - -
188th St NE & R ST NE Improvements (104th Ave SE U-turn) (50,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs332,000 - - - - - -
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue157,000 - - - - - -
Grants (Federal)50,000 - - - - - -
REET2 75,000 - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)50,000 - - - - - -
19Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improvements
Capital Costs- 50,000 550,000 - - - 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- 50,000 125,000 - - - 175,000
Grants - - 425,000 - - - 425,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
20Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Improvements ($25,000 Expended Prior to 2011)
Capital Costs75,000 1,000,000 - - - - 1,075,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue75,000 - - - - - 75,000
Grants - 850,000 - - - - 850,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees- 150,000 - - - - 150,000
21C Street NW and West Main Street
Capital Costs- 100,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- 20,000 200,000 - - - 220,000
Grants - 80,000 800,000 - - - 880,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
25 F St SE and 4th St SE Traffic Signal ($396,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs1,000 - - - - - 1,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue1,000 - - - - - 1,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Other Sources- - - - - - -
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 8
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Intersection Improvement Projects (Cont.)
38Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements
Capital Costs- - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000
Grants - - - 1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
43 Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs- - - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - 125,000 1,951,000 - 2,076,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - 25,000 299,000 - 324,000
6329th Street SE & R Street SE -
Capital Costs- - - - - 2,945,000 2,945,000
Funding Sources:- - - - - - -
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - - - 2,325,000 2,325,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 620,000 620,000
Other Sources- - - - - - -
Subtotal, Intersection Imp. Projects:
Capital Costs495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue233,000 70,000 325,000 100,000 150,000 - 878,000
Grants 50,000 930,000 1,225,000 1,225,000 3,601,000 2,325,000 9,356,000
Traffic Impact Fees87,300 86,900 86,500 111,000 384,600 705,200 1,461,500
Traffic Mitigation Fees- 150,000 - - - - 150,000
REET2 75,000 - - - - - 75,000
Other (Redflex)50,000 - - - - - 50,000
Total Funding495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 9
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Traffic Signal and Intelligent Transportation Syste m (ITS) Projects
34Traffic Signal Improvements
Capital Costs175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
Funding Sources:
Urestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (REET 2)175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
50ITS Dynamic Message Signs ($880K beyond 2016)
Capital Costs- - 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000
Grants - - 190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Other (REET2)- - - - - - -
51East Valley Highway ITS Expansion
Capital Costs- 800,000 - - - - 800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - 692,000 - - - - 692,000
Traffic Impact Fees- 108,000 - - - - 108,000
Other (REET2)- - - - - - -
Subtotal, ITS Projects:
Capital Costs175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000
Grants - 692,000 190,000 - 190,000 - 1,072,000
Traffic Impact Fees- 108,000 - - - - 108,000
REET2175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000
Total Funding 175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 10
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects
23BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass ($224,000 Expended Prior to 2012, $5 Million beyond 2017)
Capital Costs- - - - - 4,800,000 4,800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - 4,550,000 4,550,000
Other (Other Agencies)- - - - - 250,000 250,000
24 Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail
Capital Costs- - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000
Grants - - - - 382,500 382,500 765,000
Other - - - - - - -
26METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttles
Capital Costs220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
30 Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program
Capital Costs100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Other - - - - - - -
31Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improv.
Capital Costs100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Other - - - - - - -
32Citywide Sidewalk Improvements
Capital Costs20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Other (REET2)- - - - - - -
44 A ST NE Pedestrian Improvements
Capital Costs- - - 150,000 - - 150,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - 150,000 - - 150,000
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
45Interurban Trailhead Improvements
Capital Costs- - - 210,000 - - 210,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - 210,000 - - 210,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
56 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements
Capital Costs373,500 - - - - - 373,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants373,500 - - - - - 373,500
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Subtotal, Non-Motorized & Transit Projects:
Capital Costs 813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue420,000 320,000 420,000 370,000 462,500 362,500 2,355,000
Grants373,500 - - 360,000 382,500 4,932,500 6,048,500
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Other (Other Agencies)- - - - - 250,000 250,000
Total Funding 813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 11
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects
13 Mohawk Plastics Site Wetland Mitigation ($656,000 Expwnded Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000
27 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management Study
Capital Costs2,000 - - - - - 2,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue2,000 - - - - - 2,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
29 So. 277th, Wetland Mitigation ($204,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees
46104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study ($2,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs3,000 - - - - - 3,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue3,000 - - - - - 3,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
47 Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study
Capital Costs- - - - 5,000 - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 5,000 - 5,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
48 Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study ($2,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
49S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Study ($1,000 Expended Prior to 2012)
Capital Costs5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue5,000 - - - - - 5,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
54 Kersey Way Study
Capital Costs 200,000 - - 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - 500,000 - - 500,000
Grants - - - 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 - - - - - 200,000
55 Mary Olson Farm
Capital Costs 1,000 - - - - - 1,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue1,000 1,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
Subtotal, Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects:
Capital Costs 271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue46,000 25,000 25,000 500,000 5,000 - 601,000
Grants - - - 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 - - - - - 200,000
Traffic Impact Fees25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000
Total Funding 271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 12
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
TIP#Roadway Preservation Projects
28 Annual Bridge Preservation Project
Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - -
35 Annual Arterial Street Preservation
Capital Costs 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
Arterial Street Fund 1051,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000
36 Annual Arterial Crackseal Program
Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
Arterial Street Fund 105200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
37 Local Street Preservation Program SOS
Capital Costs 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - - -
Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Subtotal, Preservation Projects:
Capital Costs3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000
Arterial Street Fund 1051,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 9,000,000
Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Total Funding3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
Roadway Projects12,929,235 9,924,128 3,250,500 9,100,900 17,664,600 119,330,500 172,199,863
Intersection Projects495,300 1,236,900 1,636,500 1,436,000 4,135,600 3,030,200 11,970,500
Signal & ITS Projects175,000 975,000 395,000 175,000 395,000 175,000 2,290,000
NonMotorized Projects813,500 500,000 440,000 910,000 865,000 5,725,000 9,253,500
Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects271,000 45,000 50,000 3,670,000 30,000 65,000 4,131,000
Preservation Projects3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 21,300,000
Total Costs 18,234,035 16,231,028 9,322,000 18,841,900 26,640,200 131,875,700 221,144,863
FUNDING SOURCES:
Unrestricted Street Revenue1,228,300 508,500 850,000 1,554,000 1,816,500 3,412,500 9,369,800
Traffic Impact Fees1,507,700 344,900 712,000 2,408,600 1,911,600 5,415,700 12,300,500
Traffic Mitigation Fees200,000 150,000 - - - - 350,000
Local Street Fund 1032,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Arterial Street Fund 1051,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 9,000,000
Grants8,304,535 6,696,265 3,865,000 9,974,300 15,717,100 96,407,500 140,964,700
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000
Other (REET2)250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,125,000
Other (GO Bonds)129,400 - - - - - 129,400
Other (Agencies)2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - 250,000 3,596,200
Other (Development)200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000 12,810,000
Other (Muckleshoot)547,300 - - - - - 597,300
Other (Redflex)250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,250,000
Other Sources- - - - 800,000 13,075,000 13,875,000
PWTF - 3,226,963 - - - - 3,226,963
Total Funding 18,234,035 16,231,028 9,322,000 18,841,900 26,640,200 131,875,700 221,144,863
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 13
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Unrestricted Street Revenue
Beginning Fund Balance1,200,000 521,700 563,200 268,200 (730,800) (1,987,300)
Annual Revenue550,000 550,000 555,000 555,000 560,000 560,000
Project Expenses1,228,300 508,500 850,000 1,554,000 1,816,500 3,412,500
End of Year Fund Balance521,700 563,200 268,200 (730,800) (1,987,300) (4,839,800)
Traffic Impact Fees
Beginning Fund Balance1,049,313 341,613 796,713 884,713 (723,887) (1,835,487)
Annual Revenue800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000
Project Expenses1,507,700 344,900 712,000 2,408,600 1,911,600 5,415,700
End of Year Fund Balance341,613 796,713 884,713 (723,887) (1,835,487) (6,451,187)
Traffic Mitigation Fees
Beginning Fund Balance362,100 162,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100
Annual Revenue- - - - - -
Project Expenses200,000 150,000 - - - -
End of Year Fund Balance162,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100 12,100
Local Street Fund 103
Beginning Fund Balance- - - - - -
Annual Revenue2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
Project Expenses2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000
End of Year Fund Balance- - - - - -
Arterial Street Fund 105
Beginning Fund Balance- - - - - -
Annual Revenue1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
Project Expenses1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000
End of Year Fund Balance- - - - - -
Unrestricted Cap. Imp. Funds
Annual Budget20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000
Project Expenses20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000
Other (RedFlex in Fund 328)
Annual Budget250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Project Expenses250,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Other (REET2)
Annual Budget250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000
Project Expenses250,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000
Grants
Secured8,304,535 1,500,000 - - - -
Unsecured8,304,535 5,196,265 3,865,000 9,974,300 15,717,100 96,407,500
PWTFL
Secured - 3,226,963 - - - -
Unsecured- - - - - -
Other (Other Agencies)
Secured - - - - - -
Unsecured2,096,800 1,249,400 - - - 250,000
Other (Development)
Secured - - - - - -
Unscured200,000 - - 850,000 2,500,000 9,260,000
Other (Muckleshoot)
Secured547,300 - - - - -
Unsecured- - - - - -
Other Sources
Secured - - - - - -
Unsecured- - - - 800,000 13,075,000
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects & Financing Plan Summary 14
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 15
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 1 (3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW) TIP # 1
Project No:c207a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Ingrid Gaub LOS Corridor ID# 18
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 258,962 - 18,500 - 277,462 427,462
Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,235,779 4,586,930 785,000 - 6,607,709 6,607,709
Traffic Impact Fees 191,060 50,000 684,000 25,000 925,060 1,175,060
Other Sources (Developer)*- 207,560 200,000 - 407,560 407,560
1,685,801 4,844,490 1,687,500 25,000 8,217,791 8,617,791
-
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,390,404 326,819 - - 1,717,223 1,717,223
Right of Way 295,397 768,373 - - 1,063,770 1,063,770
Construction - 3,749,298 1,687,500 25,000 5,436,798 5,836,798
1,685,801 4,844,490 1,687,500 25,000 8,217,791 8,617,791
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 168,500 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 785,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 150,000 25,000 25,000 934,000 -
Other Sources (Developer)*- - - - 200,000 -
25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 -
25,000 300,000 25,000 25,000 2,087,500 -
Grants / Other Sources:*Other funds are MultiCare half street contribution.
Construct a multi-lane arterial from 3rd St. NW to 14th St. NW. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor
development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor.
The project length is approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the northern property owner. If the
property develops, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251,000).
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,830.
Adopted Budget
Progress Summary:
Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final design was completed along with the environmental process. Construction began
in 2011 and is expected to be completed in 2012. Costs beyond 2012 are for wetland monitoring and planting.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 16
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to Fir TIP # 2
Project No:cp1118
Project Type:Non-Motorized
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 10,000 46,500 43,500 56,500 100,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 40,000 60,000 740,800 100,000 840,800
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- 50,000 106,500 784,300 156,500 940,800
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 50,000 105,000 40,000 155,000 195,000
Right of Way - - 1,500 - 1,500 1,500
Construction - - - 744,300 - 744,300
- 50,000 106,500 784,300 156,500 940,800
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 90,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 800,800 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - - - 890,800 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 145,000 -
Right of Way - - - - 1,500 -
Construction - - - - 744,300 -
- - - - 890,800 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grants are $100K from Federal Discretionary Funds and $740,830 from State Ped & Bike Safety Grants.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct pedestrian improvements along Auburn Way South between Dogwood St SE and Fir St SE that are consistent
with WSDOT's SR-164 Route Development Plan. This project includes sidewalk improvements, access management, a mid-block
pedestrian crossing, construction of a u-turn wedge at Fir St SE and street lighting.
Progress Summary:
Project design will begin in 2011 with construction expected to be completed in 2013. The City was awarded $100,000 in
federal funding and $740,830 in state funding in May 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 17
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way Corridor Imp. (4th St NE to 4th St SE) TIP # 3
Project No:c409a0
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2-3
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 78,251 - - - 78,251 788,251
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,108,700
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951
Capital Expenditures:
Design 78,251 - - - 78,251 696,951
Right of Way - - - - - 200,000
Construction - - - - - 3,000,000
78,251 - - - 78,251 3,896,951
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 110,000 600,000 710,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 618,700 - 618,700 -
Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 -
Construction - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 -
- - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700 -
Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is not secured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project is based on a pre-design study and is intended to improve pedestrian accessibility, appearance, and link the
downtown area along Auburn Way South between 4th St NE and 4th St SE. This project may include some pavement
repairs. However, an overlay was completed as part of the City's Arterial Pavement Preservation Program in 2007. Although
this was considered a temporary fix, the scope has been modified to account for the pavement work. The project length is
approximately a half mile.
Progress Summary:
The pavement portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial Pavement Preservation
Program.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 18
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: I Street NE Corridor (45th St. NE to S 277th St) TIP # 4
Project No:c415a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 21
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 271,127
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources (Development)- - - - - 5,760,000
Other (*Port of Seattle)- - - - - -
11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 7,031,127
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,957 - 25,000 - 35,957 485,000
Right of Way 870 - 234,300 - 235,170 1,254,300
Construction - - - - - 5,280,000
11,827 - 259,300 - 271,127 7,031,127
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 259,300 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources (Development)- - - 5,760,000 5,760,000 -
Other (Port of Seattle)- - - - - -
- - - 6,760,000 7,019,300
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 460,000 485,000 -
Right of Way - - - 1,020,000 1,254,300 -
Construction - - - 5,280,000 5,280,000 -
- - - 6,760,000 7,019,300 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Mitigation Funds in the unrestricted fund balance. Grant is unsecured.
*Developer in kind funds/services support this project but do not pass through the city. $409K is Port of Seattle
Total Expenditures:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,200.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The final alignment of the I Street Corridor is being analyzed as part of the Northeast Auburn Special Area Plan
Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW and Construction will be developer funded. The cross section will likely
be a 5-lane arterial per the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Progress Summary:
This project is development driven. The project has been delayed due to the delay of the nearby pending development.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 19
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street Grade Separation (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5
Project No:c201a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 6
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 150,000 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)419,800 452,580 4,791,535 4,208,465 5,663,915 9,872,380
REET2 169,400 970,580 - - 1,139,980 1,139,980
Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)2,441,000 1,500,000 661,400 - 4,602,400 4,602,400
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)- - - - - 3,613,500
Traffic Mitigation Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000 660,000
PWTFL - - - 3,226,963 - 3,226,963
Other Sources (Other Agencies)*180,200 54,940 2,096,800 1,249,400 2,331,940 3,581,340
3,870,400 3,128,100 7,549,735 8,684,828 14,548,235 23,233,063
Debt Service:
3,613,500
Capital Expenditures:
Design 2,522,300 511,000 - - 3,033,300 3,033,300
Right of Way 1,348,100 2,251,900 - - 3,600,000 3,600,000
Construction - 365,200 7,549,735 8,684,828 7,914,935 16,599,763
PWTFL Debt Service - - - - - 3,613,500
3,870,400 3,128,100 7,549,735 8,684,828 14,548,235 23,233,063
TotalExpenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 9,000,000 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)- - - - 661,400 -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 482,000 3,131,500
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - 3,226,963 -
Other Sources (Other Agencies)*- - - - 3,346,200 -
120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563 3,131,500
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 16,234,563 -
PWTFL Debt Service 120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 482,000 3,131,500
120,500 120,500 120,500 120,500 16,716,563 3,131,500
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $21,827.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M St SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks.
Progress Summary:
100% Design Drawings and right of way acquisition were completed in 2011. Construction is expected to start in early 2012.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Grants / Other Sources: *Grants are Federal and State funds. Other Agencies include Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, BNSF, PSE and King County.
PWTFL has 30 Year repayment schedule.
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 20
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: South 277th (Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge) TIP # 6
Project No:c222a0
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 15
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 169,085
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - 2,500,000
Other - - - - - -
19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 4,669,085
Capital Expenditures:
Design 18,510 - 150,000 - 168,510 418,510
Right of Way 575 - - - 575 250,575
Construction - - - - - 4,000,000
19,085 - 150,000 - 169,085 4,669,085
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 150,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 2,000,000 2,000,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Development Funds)*- - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 4,500,000 4,650,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 250,000 400,000 -
Right of Way - - - 250,000 250,000 -
Construction - - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 -
- - - 4,500,000 4,650,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:*Developer funds or in kind services.
Total Expenditures:
The annual maintenance costs for this project is estimated to be $27,250.
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project includes preliminary engineering, design, right of way acquisition and construction of major widening on S. 277th
Street, including the addition of three lanes, one westbound and two eastbound, a Class 1 trail, storm, sewer and water
improvements. The project length is nine-tenths of a mile. The final configuration will include three lanes eastbound and two
lanes westbound.
Progress Summary:
The majority of this roadway is currently in the City of Kent's jurisdiction. Because the property served from the roadway is in
the City of Auburn, the plan is to annex this portion of the roadway from Kent into the City of Auburn. The majority of this
project is expected to be completed by adjacent developments.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 21
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP # 7
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 12
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 575,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,800,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 3,375,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 375,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 3,000,000
- - - - - 3,375,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 75,000 500,000 575,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 375,000 - 375,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 -
- - 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project was originally scoped to include pavement preservation. The pavement preservation component could still be
combined with this project, but is also eligible for the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. This project should look to
improve the railroad crossing grades as well as the vertical sight distance to the interurban trail to the west of the tracks. The
cost estimate listed below is planning level cost.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 22
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW) TIP # 8
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 18
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 150,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Developer)*150,000 - - - 150,000 150,000
150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 400,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction 150,000 - - - 150,000 2,650,000
150,000 - - - 150,000 3,300,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 3,000,000 3,000,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - -
Other (Developer)*- - - - - -
- 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 150,000 250,000 400,000 -
Right of Way - - - 250,000 250,000 -
Construction - - - 2,500,000 2,500,000 -
- 150,000 - 3,000,000 3,150,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:*Anticipated developer contributions (cash or in kind services). Grant funding shown is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Construct a multi-lane arterial from W Main to 3rd St NW. This project will connect A St NW, Phase 1 to the Sound Transit
Station and the Central Business District. This project may end up being funded all or in part by developers. The project
length is one fifth of a mile.
Progress Summary:
The parking garage constructed by the Auburn Regional Medical Center completed a portion of this project in 2009.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 23
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: D Street NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW) TIP # 9
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 20
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201111 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 4,250,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,050,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 6,300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 1,050,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000
Construction - - - - - 3,500,000
- - - - - 6,300,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 250,000 250,000 4,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 50,000 2,000,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 300,000 300,000 750,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,750,000
Construction - - - - - 3,500,000
- - - 300,000 300,000 6,000,000
Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding shown is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $11,450.
Adopted Budget
Construct a four-lane arterial per the city Comprehensive Plan. It will improve north/south mobility. This project is tied to
potential future development and will complete a major north/south arterial corridor from Ellingson Road SW (41st Street SE)
to S. 277th St. The D St NW project length is approximately 0.42 miles.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 24
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: F Street SE (4th St SE to Auburn Way S) TIP # 10
Project No:cp0911
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,200,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 7,620 - - - - 307,620
Other - - - - - -
7,620 - - - - 2,507,620
Capital Expenditures:
Design 7,620 - - - 7,620 257,620
Right of Way - - - - - 75,000
Construction - - - - - 2,175,000
7,620 - - - 7,620 2,507,620
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)200,000 2,000,000 - - 2,200,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 250,000 - - 300,000 -
Other - - - - - -
250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 250,000 - - 250,000 -
Right of Way - 75,000 - - 75,000 -
Construction - 2,175,000 - - 2,175,000 -
250,000 2,250,000 - - 2,500,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $4100.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The F St SE project includes pavement reconstruction, installation of curbs, gutters, an 8-foot wide sidewalk on both sides,
parking on one side, and a center turn-lane, as well as crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge. This
project improves mobility and safety along the corridor. The project length is approximately 0.3 miles.
Progress Summary:
Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Final design and construction are planned to be completed
following construction of the M Street grade separation project.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 25
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP # 11
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,225,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 50,000 - 250,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 - 1,475,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 50,000 - 125,000
Right of Way - - - - - 200,000
Construction - - - - - 1,150,000
- - - 50,000 - 1,475,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 150,000 - - 250,000 -
Other - - - - - -
275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 75,000 - - - 125,000 -
Right of Way 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Construction - 1,150,000 - 1,150,000 -
275,000 1,150,000 - - 1,475,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,500.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct a complete 4 lane street section on M St NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design will be done in 2013 to refine project scope, alignment, and cost.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 26
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Grade-Separated Crossing of BNSF Railyard TIP # 12
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 125,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - 32,000,000
- - - - - 32,125,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 3,625,000
Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000
Construction - - - - - 24,500,000
- - - - - 32,125,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 - - 125,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Developer)- - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 31,000,000
- 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 31,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 2,500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 4,000,000
Construction - - - - - 24,500,000
- 125,000 - 1,000,000 1,125,000 31,000,000
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Not scheduled for completion until after 2015.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project consists of a grade-separated crossing of the BNSF Railyard, either from SR-18 to 6th Street SE or from 15th
Street SW to A Street SE. The first alternative would entail realigning the SR-18 eastbound ramp, grade separating the main
north/south line and the Stampede Pass line, and connecting to 6th Street SE. The second alternative would provide a new
corridor from 15th Street SW to A Street SE in the vicinity of 12th Street SE and 17th Street SE, either via an overpass or
underpass of the BNSF Railyard. This project improves traffic flow significantly due to the potential development of the
BNSF yard as an intermodal freight facility.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 27
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: West Valley Hwy Improvements (SR-18 to West Main Street)TIP # 14
Project No:cp0916
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 35
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 58,730 5,000 - - 63,730
Grants (Fed,State,Local)139,726 2,210,920 - - - 2,350,646
REET 2 53,302 41,680 - - - 94,982
Traffic Mitigation Fees 75,000 - - - - 75,000
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 530,000 - - - 555,000
293,028 2,841,330 5,000 - - 3,139,358
-
-
Capital Expenditures:-
Design 293,028 339,680 - - 632,708 632,708
Right of Way - 5,580 - - 5,580 5,580
Construction - 2,496,070 5,000 - 2,501,070 2,501,070
293,028 2,841,330 5,000 - 3,139,358 3,139,358
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 5,000 -
- - - - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: TIB Grant (secured).
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will widen the roadway to accommodate an extension of the two way left turn lane, add curb & gutter, storm drainage,
repair failing roadway surface; install sidewalk on one side of the roadway; install city standard street lighting, improve bicycle
accommodations, and install a new traffic signal at the intersection of West Main Street and West Valley Highway. This project will
improve the capacity, safety, and driving comfort of the corridor as well as reduce the amount of time maintenance staff spends doing
temporary repairs.
Progress Summary:
Design started in 2010 and construction is planned for 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 28
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 8th Street NE Widening (Pike St to R St NE)TIP # 15
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,160,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 290,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 1,450,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction - - - - - 1,000,000
- - - - - 1,450,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 -
Other - - - - - -
450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 200,000 - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 -
450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Add eastbound lane to Southside of 8th St NE. Currently the lane exists from M St NE and drops as a right turn only lane at
the intersection of 8th St NE and Pike St. This would extend the lane to R St NE where it would then be a right turn only lane
onto R St NE southbound. This is a planning level cost estimate.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 29
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 49th Street NE from Auburn Way North to I Street NE TIP # 16
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 29
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - -
Other (Development)*- - - - - 3,350,000
- - - - - 3,350,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 650,000
Construction - - - - - 2,500,000
- - - - - 3,350,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - - -
Other (Development)*- 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 -
- 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 -
Right of Way - 650,000 - - 650,000 -
Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 -
- 850,000 2,500,000 - 3,350,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: *Future development is expected to fund and construct this project.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $27,050.
Adopted Budget
Construct east/west corridor from Auburn Way North to I Street NE. The existing 49th Street NE extends westerly to B Street
NE. This project also includes a traffic signal at the intersection of Auburn Way North and 49th Street NE. This roadway was
evaluated and recommended in the NE Special Planning Area. It is anticipated that this will be constructed by future
development. It is approximately 3/4 of a mile in length.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 30
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Traffic Calming Improvements TIP #33
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Pablo Para
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous 2 Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)- 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 1,400,000
- 200,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 1,400,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 140,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 180,000 180,000 180,000 360,000 1,260,000
- 200,000 200,000 200,000 400,000 1,400,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000 -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Redflex money transferred from General Fund.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Annual maintenance cost for these improvements are estimated to be
Adopted Budget
The City's Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program was adopted by City Council in November of 2005. Staff receives complaints from
citizens and then gathers data to confirm that a speeding issue and/or cut through traffic issue is present. This money is for physical
improvements to the streets once all other options have been exhausted. Physical improvements may include items such as lighting,
signing, striping, speed humps, speed tables, chicanes, traffic circles, and median treatments.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to implement valuable safety enhnancements citywide. 2011 Improvements include construction of
pedestrian activated crosswalk warning beacons, signage improvements and speed cushion installations.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 31
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 3 TIP # 39
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 735,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 115,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 850,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - 135,000
Construction - - - - - 715,000
- - - - - 850,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 85,000 650,000 735,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - 15,000 100,000 115,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - 100,000 750,000 850,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - 85,000 50,000 135,000 -
Construction - - 15,000 700,000 715,000 -
- - 100,000 750,000 850,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 320th St
and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include constructing bike lanes, sidewalks, dual southbound left turn lanes into GRCC, and ITS. A
portion of this project is the main entrance to Green River Community College and will require additional on-site improvements by
GRCC.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 32
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 1 TIP # 40
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 125,000 - 1,690,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 25,000 50,000 260,000
Other - - - - - -
- - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 250,000
Construction - - - - - 1,500,000
- - 50,000 150,000 50,000 1,950,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,565,000 - - - 1,690,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 185,000 - - - 260,000 -
Other - - - - - -
1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 -
Construction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 -
1,750,000 - - - 1,950,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of a 4-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th St.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is planned for 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 33
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 TIP # 41
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19, 23
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 965,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 30,000 - 215,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 30,000 - 1,180,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 30,000 - 80,000
Right of Way - - - - - 100,000
Construction - - - - - 1,000,000
- - - 30,000 - 1,180,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)100,000 865,000 - - 965,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 135,000 - - 215,000 -
Other - - - - - -
150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 50,000 - - - 80,000 -
Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 -
Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 -
150,000 1,000,000 - - 1,180,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 312th St
and 124th Ave SE. Improvements include adding bike lanes, dual westbound left turn lanes, dual southbound thru lanes, northbound
right turn pocket, ITS and pedestrian safety improvements.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is scheduled for 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 34
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements TIP # 42
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 553,600
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 116,400
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 670,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 90,000
Right of Way - - - - - 60,000
Construction - - - - - 520,000
- - - - - 670,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 51,500 502,100 - 553,600 -
Traffic Impact Fees 30,000 8,500 77,900 - 116,400 -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 30,000 60,000 - - 90,000 -
Right of Way - - 60,000 - 60,000 -
Construction - - 520,000 - 520,000 -
30,000 60,000 580,000 - 670,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition, and construction of a 3 lane roadway with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on
SE 320th St between 124th Ave SE and the western entrance to GRCC.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 35
LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Downtown Promenade Improvements TIP # 52
Project No:cp1005
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak/Elizabeth Chamberlain
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Capital Improv. Fund- - - - - -
Grants (Federal)- 2,137,986 55,100 - 2,193,086 2,193,086
REET1 - - - - - -
Other (GO Bond)1,040,089 2,903,426 89,900 - 4,033,415 4,033,415
1,040,089 5,041,412 145,000 - 6,226,501 6,226,501
Capital Expenditures:
Design 1,040,089 276,035 - - 1,316,124 1,316,124
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 4,765,377 145,000 - 4,910,377 4,910,377
1,040,089 5,041,412 145,000 - 6,226,501 6,226,501
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2016
Funding Sources:
Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - -
Grants (Federal)- - - - 55,100 -
REET1 - - - - - -
Other (GO Bond)- - - - 89,900 -
- - - - 145,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 145,000 -
- - - - 145,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is Federal EDA Grant. Other Funding is Local Revitalization Funding GO Bond revenue.
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of Downtown Promenade improvements. Project includes
storm, sewer, water and roadway improvements of Division Street between Main St and 3rd St SW/SE.
Progress Summary:
Design and construction will be completed in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Adopted Budget
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 36
LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Downtown Pedestrian Lighting TIP # 57
Project No:cp1116
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Capital Improv. Fund- - - - - -
Grants (Federal)- - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other (GO Bond)- 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000
- 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 16,500 - - 16,500 16,500
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 429,000 39,500 - 468,500 468,500
- 445,500 39,500 - 485,000 485,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2016
Funding Sources:
Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - -
Grants (Federal)- - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other (GO Bond)- - - - 39,500 -
- - - - 39,500 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 39,500 -
- - - - 39,500 -
Grants / Other Sources:Other Funding is Local Revitalization Funding GO Bond revenue.
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Adjusted Budget
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget Amendments
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of Downtown street lighting replacements.
Progress Summary:
Design and construction will be completed in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 37
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South Corridor Imp., Fir ST SE to Hemlock ST SE TIP # 58
Project No:cp1119
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (State)- 237,000 2,189,400 - 2,426,400 2,426,400
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources(Muckleshoot)- 59,300 547,300 - 606,600 606,600
- 296,300 2,736,700 3,033,000 3,033,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 281,300 77,000 - 358,300 358,300
Right of Way - 15,000 262,000 - 277,000 277,000
Construction - - 2,397,700 - 2,397,700 2,397,700
- 296,300 2,736,700 - 3,033,000 3,033,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - - 2,189,400 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources(Muckleshoot)- - - - 547,300 -
- - - - 3,033,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 77,000 -
Right of Way - - - - 262,000 -
Construction - - - - 2,397,700 -
- - - - 2,736,700 -
Grants / Other Sources:State Grant is TIB.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $9,300.
Adopted Budget
This project will widen Auburn Way South between Fir St SE and Hemlock St SE to five lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks, illumination
and storm improvements. A new traffic signal will also be constructed at Hemlock Street SE and connect to Auburn's Intelligent
Transportation System.
Progress Summary:
Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) awarded grant in the amount of $2,426,400 on November 19,
2010 to the City of Auburn.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 38
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)TIP # 60
Project No:xxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 468,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,645,600
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,527,200
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 6,640,800
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 631,800
Right of Way - - - - - 1,263,600
Construction - - - - - 4,745,400
- - - - - 6,640,800
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 234,000 234,000 - 468,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 397,800 3,247,800 - 3,645,600 -
Traffic Impact Fees - 1,263,600 1,263,600 - 2,527,200 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 631,800 - - 631,800 -
Right of Way - 1,263,600 - - 1,263,600 -
Construction - - 4,745,400 - 4,745,400 -
- 1,895,400 4,745,400 - 6,640,800 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Construct a multi-lane arterial from 8TH Street SE to AWS. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 39
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South Bypass TIP # 61
Project No:cpxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID#4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 60,450,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 60,450,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 6,500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 8,450,000
Construction - - - - - 45,500,000
- - - - - 60,450,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 6,500,000 6,500,000 -
Right of Way - - - 8,450,000 8,450,000 -
Construction - - - 45,500,000 45,500,000 -
- - - 60,450,000 60,450,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Construction of a new Auburn Way South Bypass connecting SR 164 to SR 18 via Riverwalk Drive and a new R Street interchange. The
project will improve traffic operations on SR 164 and will have fewer intersections operating over capacity during the PM Peak hour. It
will also improve sight distance and roadway geometrics to provide drivers with improved visibility and overall safety.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 40
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street SE)TIP # 62
Project No:cpxxx
Project Type:Miscellaneous
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 800,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 3,250,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - 700,000
- - - - - 4,750,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,450,000
Construction - - - - - 2,800,000
- - - - - 4,750,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 400,000 400,000 800,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 1,200,000 2,050,000 3,250,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - 350,000 350,000 700,000 -
- - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 500,000 - 500,000 -
Right of Way - - 1,450,000 - 1,450,000 -
Construction - - - 2,800,000 2,800,000 -
- - 1,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
The purpose of this project is to revitalize and beautify Auburn Way South from the SR 18 interchange to the intersection of M Street SE.
Proposed improvements include: enhancement of crosswalks and pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sidewalks; curb and gutter;
pedestrian ramps; new landscaped medians; street trees; new lighting; pedestrian benches; trash receptacles; recycling containers and
other appropriate amenities.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 41
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 104th Ave SE) TIP # 64
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201212 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
-
-
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 1,550,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,250,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 1,250,000
Other - - - - - 12,650,000
- - - - - 24,700,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 2,500,000
Right of Way - - - - - 3,750,000
Construction - - - - - 18,450,000
- - - - - 24,700,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 300,000 1,250,000 1,550,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 5,500,000 3,750,000 9,250,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 1,250,000 1,250,000 -
Other - - 450,000 12,200,000 12,650,000 -
- - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 -
Right of Way - - 3,750,000 - 3,750,000 -
Construction - - 18,450,000 18,450,000 -
- - 6,250,000 18,450,000 24,700,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Expand current two-lane roadway to 4-lanes, including widening of the Green River Bridge. Project includes bike lanes and
sidewalks.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 42
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (104th Ave SE to 112th Ave SE ) TIP # 65
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID #23
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
-
-
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 9,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 2,400,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 11,400,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 1,200,000
Right of Way - - - - - 1,800,000
Construction - - - - - 8,400,000
- - - - - 11,400,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 9,000,000 9,000,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 2,400,000 2,400,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 11,400,000 11,400,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 1,200,000 1,200,000 -
Right of Way - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 -
Construction - - - 8,400,000 8,400,000 -
- - - 11,400,000 11,400,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Project includes widening from existing 2-lane roadway to 4-lanes with bicycle lanes and sidewalks.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 43
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) TIP # 66
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity LOS Corridor ID #23
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
-
-
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 250,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,100,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 700,000
Other - - - - - 525,000
- - - - - 3,575,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 350,000
Right of Way - - - - - 525,000
Construction - - - - - 2,700,000
- - - - - 3,575,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 250,000 250,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 2,100,000 2,100,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 700,000 700,000 -
Other - - - 525,000 525,000 -
- - - 3,575,000 3,575,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 350,000 350,000 -
Right of Way - - - 525,000 525,000 -
Construction - - - 2,700,000 2,700,000 -
- - - 3,575,000 3,575,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Project includes widening from existing 2-lane roadway to 4-lanes with bicycle lanes and sidewalks.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Improvement Projects 44
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 45
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Harvey Road & 8th Street NE Intersection Improvements TIP # 17
Project No:cp0611
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 5,19
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)87,100 87,700 87,300 86,900 262,100 1,602,700
Traffic Impact Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500 204,500
PWTF 1,527,300 - - - 1,527,300 1,527,300
1,818,900 87,700 87,300 86,900 1,993,900 1,731,800
Debt Service:
1,602,700
Capital Expenditures:
Design 285,000 - - - 285,000 285,000
Right of Way 196,500 - - - 196,500 196,500
Construction 1,250,300 - - - 1,250,300 1,250,300
Long Term Debt - PWTF 87,100 87,700 87,300 86,900 262,100 1,602,700
1,818,900 87,700 87,300 86,900 1,993,900 1,731,800
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
PWTF - - - - - -
86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Long Term Debt - PWTF 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400
86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500 910,400
Grants / Other Sources: PWTFLhas a 20 year term ending in 2028.
Total Funding Sources:
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Budget Amendments
Add one eastbound through/right turn lane on 8th St NE approaching Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traffic
channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane will improve traffic delays and vehicle queuing at the
intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all directions. This project will reconstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a
segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles in length with four travel lanes. The reconstruction will fix the existing poor
pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the sidewalk network.
Progress Summary:
Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for PWTFL debt payments.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 46
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 8th Street NE and R St NE Imp. (104th Ave SE St U-turn)TIP # 18
Project No:CP1104
Project Type:Intersection Improvement, Capacity
Project Manager:Robert Lee LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 157,000 - - 157,000
Grants (Federal)- 50,000 50,000 - - 100,000
REET2 - - 75,000 - 75,000 75,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)- - 50,000 - 50,000 50,000
- 50,000 332,000 - 125,000 382,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 30,000 - - 30,000 30,000
Right of Way - 20,000 - - 20,000 20,000
Construction - - 332,000 - 332,000 332,000
- 50,000 332,000 - 382,000 382,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 157,000 -
Grants (Federal)- - - - 50,000 -
REET2 - - - - 75,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Redflex)- - - - 50,000 -
- - - - 332,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 332,000 -
- - - - 332,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Federal Discretionary grant is secured.
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $6,600.
Adopted Budget
This project includes the design, right of way acquisistion and construction of intersection improvements that will either
consist of either a traffic signal with easbound u-turn capacity or a roundabout design.
Progress Summary:
The design began in 2011 with construction scheduled for 2012.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 47
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way North / 1st Street NE Signal Improvements TIP # 19
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 - 175,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 425,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 50,000 - 600,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 50,000 - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - 100,000
Construction - - - - - 450,000
- - - 50,000 - 600,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - - - 175,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)425,000 - - - 425,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
550,000 - - - 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 50,000 -
Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 -
Construction 450,000 - - - 450,000 -
550,000 - - - 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will construct a new complete traffic signal with controller cabinet and battery backup along with necessary
intersection improvements.
Progress Summary:
Design will be completed in 2013. Construction is planned for 2014.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 48
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Imp.TIP # 20
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3,4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 25,000 75,000 - - 100,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 850,000 - 850,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - 150,000 - 150,000
Other - - - - - -
- 25,000 75,000 1,000,000 - 1,100,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 25,000 75,000 - - 100,000
Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000
Construction - - 800,000 - 800,000
- 25,000 75,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,100,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 75,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 850,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Funds - - - - 150,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 1,075,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 75,000 -
Right of Way - - - - 200,000 -
Construction - - - - 800,000 -
- - - - 1,075,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Construct a westbound to northbound right turn pocket at the intersection of Auburn Way S and M St SE. This project would
also improve the turning radius at this same corner allowing drivers to make a safe right turn on red (after stopping and
yielding to oncoming vehicles). Currently the intersection geometry has necessitated the City placing a legal restriction on
this movement.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is anticipated to begin in 2011 with final design to be completed in 2012. Construction will be completed when
funding is secured.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 49
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: C Street NW and West Main Street TIP # 21
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 11
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 20,000 - 220,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 80,000 - 880,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 100,000 - 1,100,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000
Right of Way - - - - - 400,000
Construction - - - - - 600,000
- - - 100,000 - 1,100,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 200,000 - - - 220,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)800,000 - - - 880,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 100,000 -
Right of Way 400,000 - - - 400,000 -
Construction 600,000 - - - 600,000 -
1,000,000 - - - 1,100,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Grant Funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Reconstruct intersection at C St NW and W Main St. Project would include a new traffic signal and modifications to the
turning radii at each corner to help facilitate vehicular movements. The new traffic signal would allow for protected left turn
phasing for northbound and southbound left turn movements. This would also provide additional safety related to the railroad
pre-emption.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 50
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: F Street SE & 4th Street SE Traffic Signal TIP # 25
Project No:cp0914
Project Type:Non-Capacity Intersection Improvement
Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 7,807 1,090 1,000 - 9,897 9,897
Grants (Fed,State,Local)265,633 127,470 - - 393,103 393,103
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
273,440 128,560 1,000 - 403,000 403,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 48,168 - - - 48,168 48,168
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 225,272 128,560 1,000 - 354,832 354,832
273,440 128,560 1,000 - 403,000 403,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 1,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 1,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 1,000 -
- - - - 1,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant is Federal HSIP funded and does not require a city match.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $6,600.
Adopted Budget
This project includes the construction of a new traffic signal at the intersection of 4th St SE and F St SE. Intersection improvements will
include crosswalks and pedestrian signals. This project was selected based on accident history, traffic volumes, and pedestrian flow
patterns.
Progress Summary:
Project was completed in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 51
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements TIP # 38
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Intersection Safety (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 250,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,750,000
REET - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 3,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 500,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 2,500,000
- - - - - 3,000,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 150,000 - 250,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,100,000 1,650,000 - 2,750,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 200,000 300,000 - 500,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 1,000,000 1,500,000 - 2,500,000 -
- 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of four quadrant gates at the W Main St, 3rd St NW, and 37th
St NW BNSF Railroad crossings as well as active grade crossing lights and gates at the private spur crossings on C St SW and A St
NW.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 52
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Intersection Improvements TIP # 43
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 2,076,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 324,000
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 2,400,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 150,000
Right of Way - - - - - 200,000
Construction - - - - - 2,050,000
- - - - - 2,400,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 125,000 1,951,000 - 2,076,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - 25,000 299,000 - 324,000 -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Right of Way - - 200,000 - 200,000 -
Construction - - 2,050,000 - 2,050,000 -
- 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at Auburn
Way S and Riverwalk Dr SE. This project will include creating eastbound/westbound dual left turn lanes, auxiliary signal heads and
pedestrian safety enhancements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 53
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 29th Street SE & R Street SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 63
Project No:cpxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID#4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - - - 2,325,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 620,000
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 2,945,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 310,000
Right of Way - - - - - 465,000
Construction - - - - 2,170,000
- - - - - 2,945,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (State)- - - 2,325,000 2,325,000 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 620,000 620,000 -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - 2,945,000 2,945,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 310,000 310,000 -
Right of Way - - - 465,000 465,000 -
Construction - - - 2,170,000 2,170,000 -
- - - 2,945,000 2,945,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at 29th Street
SE and R Street SE. This project will include creating eastbound/westbound dual left turn lanes, auxiliary signal heads and pedestrian
safety enhancements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Intersection Improvement Projects 54
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 55
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Traffic Signal Improvements TIP #34
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Scott Nutter
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous 2 Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000
Other - - - - - -
- 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 70,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 165,000 165,000 165,000 330,000 1,155,000
- 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 1,225,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Other - - - - - -
175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000 990,000 -
175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
This project includes procuring and installing traffic signal equipment upgrades for existing signals as well as safety/capacity
improvements for existing and/or new signals. The City uses accident and traffic count data to identify intersections in need of
improvements.
Progress Summary:
Project continues to complete intersection safety improvements.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 56
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP # 50
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (ITS)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 180,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 1,140,000
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 1,320,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 120,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 1,200,000
- - - - - 1,320,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000 120,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000 760,000
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 880,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 20,000 - 20,000 - 40,000 80,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 200,000 - 200,000 - 400,000 800,000
220,000 - 220,000 - 440,000 880,000
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design and construction of Dynamic Message signs at various locations throughout the city. Dynamic message
signs are an important tool in ITS for informing roadway users. Priority locations for sign installations are based on the Comprehensive
Transportation Plans ITS map and include Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Rd.
Progress Summary:
The first phase of this project is scheduled to begin in 2014 or sooner if grant funding becomes available.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 57
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: East Valley Highway ITS Expansion TIP # 51
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 692,000 - 692,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 108,000 - 108,000
Other - - - - - -
- - - 800,000 - 800,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 85,000 - 85,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - 715,000 - 715,000
- - - 800,000 - 800,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 692,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 108,000 -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 800,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 85,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 715,000 -
- - - - 800,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5000.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund the design, coordination, permitting and construction of ITS facilities from 41st St SE to Lake Tapps Parkway.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Traffic Signal & Intelligent Transportation Systems Improvement Projects 58
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 59
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass TIP # 23
Project No:c229a0
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 53,900 - - - 53,900 53,900
Grants (Fed,State,Local)170,400 - - - 170,400 9,720,400
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees -
Other - - - - - 250,000
224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300
Capital Expenditures:
Design 224,300 - - - 224,300 974,300
Right of Way - - - - - 50,000
Construction - - - - - 9,000,000
224,300 - - - 224,300 10,024,300
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 4,550,000 4,550,000 5,000,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other (Other Agencies)*- - - 250,000 250,000 -
- - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,000,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - 750,000 750,000 -
Right of Way - - - 50,000 50,000 -
Construction - - - 4,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000
- - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 5,000,000
Grants / Other Sources: *KC Open Space Bond and High Speed Rail Safety Money.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $240.
Adopted Budget
Project to construct an undercrossing of the BNSF Railroad in conjunction with a pedestrian bridge to allow a safe, direct,
attractive non-motorized access between neighborhoods in the City of Pacific and schools in the City of Auburn.
Progress Summary:
The design is on hold. Funding source is most likely a federal earmark. Currently this project is on hold pending some
discussions with BNSF RR. They are in the process of planning for a third rail which would significantly impact the design.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 60
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail TIP # 24
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 135,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 765,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - - - - 900,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 850,000
- - - - - 900,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 42,500 42,500 135,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 382,500 382,500 765,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 425,000 425,000 850,000 -
- 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant Funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,680.
Adopted Budget
This project will use existing right-of-way to repair the damaged roadbed to a usable multi-use trail on Academy Dr from the
Green River Rd to Auburn Way S.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 61
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: METRO Shuttle: Auburn Community and Lakeland Shuttles TIP # 26
Project No:cpxxx
Project Type:Transit Service
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Other (TBD)- - - - - -
300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Operating Costs 300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628
300,628 220,000 220,000 220,000 740,628 1,840,628
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Other (TBD)- - - - - -
220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Operating Costs 220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 -
220,000 220,000 220,000 220,000 1,320,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Operation costs associated with two new Metro routes: a Commuter Shuttle from the Lakeland Hills neighborhood to Auburn Station and
a Community Shuttle linking residential neighborhoods with commercial and service centers.
Progress Summary:
Lakeland Hill Service began in 2009. The community shuttle will begin service in 2010. Funding assistance will be requested
through the Transit Now Partnership Program.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 62
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program TIP # 30
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Bi-Annual)
Project Manager:Pablo Para
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 100,000 100,000 300,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 90,000 - 90,000 270,000
- - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,000 - 10,000 - 30,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 90,000 - 90,000 - 270,000 -
100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This is a bi-annual level of effort project used to fund small pedestrian safety studies and improvement projects. This project
provides for pedestrian safety studies and improvements at various locations citywide. Projects are prioritized annually
based on safety issues and pedestrian demands.
Progress Summary:
Project for 2011 was preliminary design of 8th St NE and SE 104th St intersection improvements. 2012 project is access
improvements at Auburn Ave and 3rd St NE.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 63
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements TIP # 31
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Safety)
Project Manager:Various
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300
Capital Expenditures:
Design 19,300 57,000 10,000 10,000 86,300 136,300
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 43,000 90,000 90,000 133,000 583,000
19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 219,300 719,300
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 -
100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This is an annual level of effort project focused on funding bicycle and safety improvements on classified roadways. Projects
are prioritized annually based upon field studies. Project was previously called "Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure
Improvements.
Progress Summary:
Projects for 2011 included preliminary design of intersection improvements at 8th st NE and SE 104th St and pedestrian trail
improvements at 37th St SE. 2012 Project has yet to be indentified.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 64
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Citywide Sidewalk Improvements TIP #32
Project No:Various
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue - 180,000 20,000 180,000 380,000 780,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 180,000 20,000 180,000 380,000 780,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 2,000 2,000 10,000 4,000 38,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 170,000 18,000 170,000 358,000 734,000
- 172,000 20,000 180,000 192,000 772,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Cap. Improv. Revenue 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET 2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 2,000 10,000 2,000 10,000 36,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 18,000 170,000 18,000 170,000 564,000 -
20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 600,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Project will fund sidewalk improvements to a variety of locations throughout the city. A sidewalk inventory was completed in
2004. Annual projects are selected based upon criteria such as: gap closure, safe walking routes to schools, completion of
downtown pedestrian corridor or "linkage", connectivity to transit services, ADA requirements, and "Save our Streets" (SOS)
project locations.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 65
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements TIP # 44
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Sidewalk Improvements (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 150,000
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 150,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 15,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 135,000
- - - - - 150,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 15,000 - - 15,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 135,000 - - 135,000 -
- 150,000 - - 150,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500.
Adopted Budget
This project completes a pedestrian connection between Downtown Auburn and the 8th St NE business district. This project will improve
a pedestrian crossing at 3rd St NE, and construct sidewalks/access ramps along the A St NE corridor.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 66
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Interurban Trailhead Improvements TIP # 45
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 210,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - - 210,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 20,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 190,000
- - - - - 210,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 20,000 - - 20,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 190,000 - - 190,000 -
- 210,000 - - 210,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:Grant funding is unsecured.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding for enhancements to existing trailheads and construction of new trailheads. Improvements include bike
racks, kiosks, parking and access.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 67
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements TIP # 56
Project No:cp1120
Project Type:Non-Motorized
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon LOS Corridor ID# 19
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 25,000 - - 25,000 25,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 373,500 - 373,500 373,500
- 25,000 373,500 - 398,500 398,500
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 373,500 -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 373,500 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 373,500 -
- - - - 373,500 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will construct pedestrian improvements along the south side of SE 312th St east of the intersection with 124th Ave SE,
intersection improvements at 116th Ave SE & SE 304th St, paint bike lanes on 116th Ave SE between SE 312th St and SE 304th St and
improve curb ramps adjacent to Rainier Middle School.
Progress Summary:
The City was awarded $398,500 in federal funding in May 2011, which consists of $75,700 for School District
education/encouragement, $1,800 for Police Dept. enforcement and $321,000 for engineering, right of way, and construction.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvement Projects 68
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 69
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project TIP #13
Project No:cp0767
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Jeff Dixon/Leah Dunsdon
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
General Fund - - - - - -
Grants - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 455,000 25,000 25,000 20,000 505,000 700,000
REET 2 176,150 - - - 176,150 176,150
631,150 25,000 25,000 20,000 681,150 175,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design 148,300 - - - 148,300 -
Right of Way - - - - - 552,850
Construction 482,850 25,000 25,000 20,000 532,850 876,150
631,150 25,000 25,000 20,000 681,150 175,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
General Fund - - - - - -
Grants - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000
REET 2 - - - - - -
25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000
Capital Expenditures:-
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000
25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 40,000
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
It is anticipated that annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting on the performance of the wetland mitigation project will be required
for a period of 10 years, in conformance with permit requirements. After the successful conclusion of this 10-year monitoring period,
which is anticipated to be in December 2019, ongoing operation expenses should be minimal.
Adopted Budget
The project consists of the design, construction, maintenance and monitoring of approximately 2.2-acres of wetland creation
and approximately 0.4-acres of wetland enhancement within the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sewer Utility in
order to compensate for approximately 1.6-acre wetland loss on the Mohawk Plastics property (Parcel # 1321049056). The
project was approved under an existing agreement approved by Resolution No. 4196, June 2007.
Progress Summary:
The City received the DOE WQ Certification, WDFW HPA, and on May 7, 2009, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 404
wetland permit (NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid specifications and construction plans were prepared and construction
began in October 2009. Construction was completed in January 2010 and the project is currently within the 10-year
monitoring period, which involves annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 70
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 41st Street SE and A Street SE Access Management Study TIP # 27
Project No:cp1110
Project Type:Safety (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID# 10,33
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- 8,000 2,000 - 10,000 10,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 2,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 2,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 2,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 2,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
This study will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
Study the area from 37th St SE to the White River on A St SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study
should review the safety and access needs of the traveling public and the adjacent properties.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design will be done to refine project scope, alignment, and cost.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 71
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: South 277th - Wetland Mitigation TIP # 29
Project No:c410a0
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620
Capital Expenditures:
Design 81,903 31,000 12,500 12,500 125,403 150,403
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 44,317 91,400 12,500 12,500 148,217 173,217
126,220 122,400 25,000 25,000 273,620 323,620
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012 - 2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 25,000 - - - 75,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
25,000 - - - 75,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 12,500 - - - 37,500 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 12,500 - - - 37,500 -
25,000 - - - 75,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adjusted Budget
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Wetland mitigation for the 277th St Grade Separation project.
Progress Summary:
This is a 10-year obligation, which began in 2004.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 72
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study TIP # 46
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Intersection Safety)
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# 24
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- 2,000 3,000 - 5,000 5,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 3,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 3,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 3,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 3,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project will fund a pre-design study to determine the right of way, environmental and construction requirements for intersection
safety improvements. This safety project scope will include sight distance improvements, constructing turn lanes, channelization,
environmental mitigation, signage and clear zone improvements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 73
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study TIP # 47
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
This project will fund a
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on
Operating Budget:This project will have no
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
Adopted Budget - - - -
Budget Amendments - - - -
Adjusted Budget - - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Total Expenditures:- - - - - 5,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
Total Funding Sources:- - 5,000 - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
Total Expenditures:- - 5,000 - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 74
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study TIP # 48
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Bike Lanes, Sidewalks and Transit Improvement Study (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 10,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 10,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 10,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 10,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding to complete a study of the 2nd St SE & F St SE corridor between Les Gove Park and Downtown Auburn.
Improvements may include pavement reconstruction, sidewalks, access ramps, signal modifications and route signing.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 75
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: S 316th Street Bicycle & Pedestrian Improvement Study TIP # 49
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Class 2 Bike Lanes / Sidewalks (Capacity)
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 37
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 5,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 5,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - -
- - - - 5,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This project provides funding for completing a study to add bicycle and pedestrian facilities on S 316th St from east of Evergreen
Heights Elementary to 51st Ave S.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 76
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Kersey Way Study TIP # 54
Project No:cpxxxx
Project Type:Capacity
Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 500,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - 6,300,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - 200,000 - 200,000 700,000
Other - - - - - -
- - 200,000 - 200,000 7,500,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 200,000 - 200,000 200,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - - 7,300,000
- - 200,000 - 200,000 7,500,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 500,000 - - 500,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 3,150,000 - - 3,150,000 3,150,000
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - 200,000 500,000
Other - - - - -
- 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000 3,650,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 200,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 3,650,000 - - 3,650,000 3,650,000
- 3,650,000 - - 3,850,000 3,650,000
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
None
Adopted Budget
This project will study improvements to the Kersey Way SE corridor from the White River Bridge to the southern city limits. The
study will develop the scope and costs for horizontal/vertical geometric roadway improvements, roadside hazard mitigation, street
lighting and non-motorized trail construction. The project length is approximately two miles.
Progress Summary:
Design will begin in 2017.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 77
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Mary Olson Farm Improvements TIP # 55
Project No:cp0815
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Leah Dunsdon
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue 85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100 106,100
Grants (Federal)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100 106,100
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 85,100 20,000 1,000 - - 106,100
85,100 20,000 1,000 - 106,100
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 1,000 -
Grants (Federal)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- - - - 1,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 1,000 -
- - - - 1,000 -
Grants / Other Sources: Federal grant is FHWA Mitigation Funds $101K received in prior years.
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This is a historical preservation project required as mitigation for S 277th Reconstruction Project.
Progress Summary:
Phase 1 was the S. 277th St Reconstruction Project. Phase II of the project was completed in 2009 and Phase 3 is
scheduled to be completed in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 78
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Preservation Projects
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Annual Bridge Preservation Project TIP # 28
Project No:Various
Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000
- 100,000 50,000 50,000 150,000 400,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - - -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
This is an annual level of effort project used to fund bridge improvements as identified by the city's annual bridge inspection program.
Progress Summary:
Program completed load rating calculations for nine bridges in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Preservation Projects 80
STREET FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Arterial Street Preservation Program
Project No:cpxxxx TIP #35
Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year EndTotal Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Property Tax - - - - - -
Utility Tax - 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
- 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 60,000 25,000 25,000 85,000 310,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 1,306,000 1,275,000 1,275,000 2,581,000 8,856,000
- 1,366,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 2,666,000 9,166,000
TotalExpenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Property Tax - - - - - -
Utility Tax 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 -
REET2 - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,550,000 -
1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 1,300,000 7,800,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
None
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully complete annual patching and overlay projects citywide.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or reha bilitation of various classified streets citywide. These
projects may include overlays, rebuilds, spot repairs, or a combination of these. This program is fun ded through a 1% utility
tax that was adopted by Council in 2008.
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Preservation Projects 81
STREET FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Arterial Crack Seal Program
Project No:cpxxxx TIP #36
Project Type:Annual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Utility Tax - 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000
REET - - - - - -
Bond proceeds - - - - - -
- 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 10,000 15,000 15,000 25,000 100,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 130,000 185,000 185,000 315,000 1,240,000
- 140,000 200,000 200,000 340,000 1,340,000
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - -
Utility Tax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
REET - - - - - -
Bond proceeds - - - - - -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 1,110,000 -
200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
None
Adopted Budget
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Implement regular maintenance of various classified streets by sealing newly formed cracks. Sealing the cracks will prolong the life of
the pavement by stopping water from draining into the subbase of the road.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully extend pavement life pavement citywide.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
RES.A
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Roadway Preservation Projects 82
LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program
Project No:Various TIP #37
Project Type:Non-Capacity
Project Manager:Wickstrom
Description:
Budget: 2011YTD Actual201211 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2011 YE 2012 Year End Total Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Budget 2013 Budget Project Total Cost
Local Street Fund - - - - - -
Property Tax - 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220
Utility Mitigation - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
- 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220
Capital Expenditures:
Design - 120,000 180,000 180,000 300,000 1,200,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - 3,278,220 1,820,000 1,820,000 5,098,220 14,198,220
- 3,398,220 2,000,000 2,000,000 5,398,220 15,398,220
Total Expenditures
2014 2015 2016 2017 2012-2017 Beyond 2017
Funding Sources:
Local Street Fund - - - - - -
Property Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 -
Utility Mitigation - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
Other - - - - - -
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction 1,820,000 1,820,000 1,820,000 1,820,000 10,920,000 -
2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000 -
Grants / Other Sources:
None
Adopted Budget
This program was created after passage of Proposition 1 on the November '04 ballot, setting the City's property tax levy limits and
creating a dedicated local street fund to be used solely for local street improvements. The program will focus on the preservation of local
streets (unclassified streets) within the City of Auburn. The work will include crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre-leveling, asphalt
overlays and roadway reconstruction. The property tax levy lift may also be used to repay bonds should they be utilized to fund this
program.
Progress Summary:
This program has successfully completed overlays since 2005. In 2011 and 2012 the program will focus on major street
reconstruction where street surfaces and the underlying base has failed.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Total Expenditures:
Total Funding Sources:
Forecasted Project Cost:
RES.A
Roadway Improvements Grant
Status*Prior to 2012201220132014201520162017Beyond 2017
C207A01A St NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW)S 4,100,0001,687,50025,00025,000300,00025,00025,000- 6,187,500
Cp11182Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood to FirS 50,000106,500784,300- - - - - 940,800
C409A03Auburn Way Imp (4th St NE to 4th St SE)WA'12 78,251- - - - 818,7003,000,000- 3,896,951
C415A04I St NE (45th St NE to S 277th St)N/A 11,827259,300- - 6,760,000- - - 7,031,127
C201A05M St SE Grade Separation (3rd ST NE to 8th St SE)S 6,998,5007,549,7008,684,828120,500120,500120,500120,500- 23,715,028
C222A06S 277th Street (AWN to Green River Bridge)WA'12 19,085150,000- - - - 4,500,000- 4,669,085
cpxxxx715th St SW Reconstruction (C St SW to UPRR)WA'12 - - - - 3,000,000375,000- - 3,375,000
cpxxxx8A St NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3rd St NW)PS 150,000- - - 150,000- 3,000,000- 3,300,000
cpxxxx9D St NW (37th St NW to 44th St NW)WA'14 - - - - - - 300,0006,000,0006,300,000
CP091110F St SE (4th St SE to AWS)WA'13 7,620- - 250,0002,250,000- - - 2,507,620
cpxxxx11M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE)WA'13 - - 50,000275,0001,150,000- - - 1,475,000
cpxxxx12BNSF Railyard Grade-Separated CrossingN/A - - - - 125,000- 1,000,00031,000,00032,125,000
cp091614West Valley Hwy Improvemnts (SR-18 to West Main Street)S 3,134,3585,000- - - - - - 3,139,358
cpxxxx158th St NE (Pike St to R St NE)A'12 - - - 450,0001,000,000- - - 1,450,000
cpxxxx1649th Street NE from Auburn Way North to M Street NEWA'13 - - - - 850,0002,500,000- 3,350,000
Varies33Traffic Calming Improvements N/A 200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000200,000- - 1,200,000
cpxxxx39124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 3WA'13 - - - - - 100,000750,000- 850,000
cpxxxx40124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 1WA'14 50,000150,0001,750,000- - - - 1,950,000
cpxxxx41124th Ave SE Corridor Imp Phase 2WA'13 - - - 150,0001,750,000- - - 1,900,000
cpxxxx42SE 320th St Corridor Imp WA'12 - - 30,000150,0001,000,000- - - 1,180,000
cp100552Downtown Promenade ImprovementsS - 145,000- - - - - - 145,000
cp111657Downtown Pedestrian Lighting S - 39,500- - - - - - 39,500
cp111958AWS Corridor Imp (Fir to Hemlock)S - 2,736,700- - - - - - 2,736,700
cpxxxx60M Street SE Corridor (8TH St SE to AWS)WA'15 - - - - 1,895,4004,745,400- - 6,640,800
cpxxxx61Auburn Way South Bypass WA'17 - - - - - - 60,450,000- 60,450,000
cpxxxx62AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M Street SE)WA'16 - - - - - 1,950,0002,800,000- 4,750,000
cpxxxx64Lea Hill Road Segment 1(R St NE to 104th Ave SE)WA'16 - - - - - 6,250,00018,450,000- 24,700,000
cpxxxx65Lea Hill Road Segment 2 (104th to 112th Ave SE) WA'17 - - - - - - 11,400,000- 11,400,000
cpxxxx66Lea Hill Road Segment 3 (112th to 124th Ave SE )WA'17 - - - - - - 3,575,000- 3,575,000
14,749,64112,929,2009,924,1283,370,50020,550,90017,084,600109,370,50037,000,000224,979,469
Intersection Improvements
CP061117Harvey/8th Street Imp - Debt ServiceN/A 303,90087,30086,90086,50086,00085,60085,200910,4001,731,800
cp1104188th St NE & R St NE Improvements (104th Ave SE U-Turn)S 50,000332,000- - - - - 382,000
cpxxxx19Auburn Way North/1 Street NE Signal ImpWA'12 - - 50,000550,000- - - - 600,000
cpxxxx20Auburn Way South and M Street SE WA'12 25,00075,0001,000,000- - - - 1,100,000
cpxxxx21C Street NW and West Main Street WA'12 - - 100,000 1,000,000- - - 1,100,000
cp091425F St SE & 4th St SE Traffic Signal S 273,4401,000 274,440
cpxxxx38Railroad Crossing Safety ImprovementsWA'12 - - - - 1,200,0001,800,000- - 3,000,000
cpxxxx43Auburn Way South & Riverwalk ImpA'11 - - - - 150,0002,250,000- 2,400,000
cpxxxx6329th Street SE & R Street SE WA'16 - - - - - - 2,945,000- 2,945,000
652,340495,3001,236,9001,636,5001,436,0004,135,6003,030,200910,40013,533,240
Traffic Signal & ITS Improvements
Varies34Traffic Signal Improvement ProgramsN/A - 175,000175,000175,000175,000 175,000175,000- 1,050,000
cpxxxx50ITS Dynamic Message Signs WA'13 - - - 220,000- 220,000- 440,000
cpxxxx51East Valley Hwy ITS Expansion WA'13 - - 800,000- - - - 800,000
- 175,000975,000395,000175,000 395,000175,000- 2,290,000
Non-Motorized & Transit Improvements
C229A023BNSF/East Valley Hwy. Ped UndercrossingPS 224,300- - - - - 4,800,0005,024,300
cpxxxx24Academy Drive Multi Use Trail WA'13 - - - - 50,000425,000425,000- 900,000
NA26Auburn Community and Lakeland ShuttlesN/A - 220,000220,000220,000220,000 220,000220,000- 1,320,000
Varies30Citywide Pedestrian Crossing ProgramN/A - 100,000- 100,000- 100,000- - 300,000
Varies31Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Imp N/A 119,300100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000100,000- 719,300
Varies32Citywide Sidewalk Improvements N/A 425,10020,000180,00020,000180,00020,000180,000- 1,025,100
cpxxxx44A St NE Pedestrian ImprovementsWA'12 - - - - 150,000- - - 150,000
cpxxxx45Interurban Trailhead ImprovementsWA'13 - - - - 210,000- - - 210,000
cp112056Lea Hill Safe Routes to School ImprovementsS 25,000373,500- - - - - - 398,500
793,700813,500500,000440,000910,000865,0005,725,000 - 10,047,200
Prelim. Engineering and Misc. Improvements
cp076713Mohawk Plastics Site Wetland MitigationN/A 656,00025,00020,00025,00020,00025,00065,000- 836,000
cp11102741st St SE and A St SE Access Management StudyN/A 8,0002,000- - - - - - 10,000
C410A029S 277th Street -Wetland Mitigation N/A 204,00025,00025,00025,000- - - - 279,000
cpxxxx46104th Ave SE & Green River Study N/A 2,0003,000- - - - - - 5,000
cpxxxx47Environmental Park Roadway Improvements StudyN/A - - - - - 5,000- - 5,000
cpxxxx48Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Imp StudyN/A - 10,000- - - - - - 10,000
cpxxxx49S 316th St Bicycle & Pedestrian Imp StudyN/A - 5,000 - - - - - 5,000
cpxxxx54Kersey Way Study N/A - 200,000- - - - 350,000550,000
cp081555Mary Olson Farm Improvements N/A - 1,000- - - - - - 1,000
870,000270,00045,00050,00020,00030,000415,000- 1,700,000
Roadway Preservation Programs
cpxxxx28Annual Bridge Maintenance N/A - 50,00050,00050,00050,00050,00050,000- 300,000
Varies35Arterial Streets (105 Fund) N/A - 1,300,0001,300,0001,300,0001,300,0001,300,0001,300,000- 7,800,000
Varies36Arterial Crack Seal (105 Fund) N/A - 200,000200,000200,000200,000 200,000200,000- 1,200,000
Varies37Local Streets - SOS (103 Fund)N/A - 2,000,0002,000,0002,000,0002,000,0002,000,0002,000,000- 12,000,000
- 3,550,0003,550,0003,550,0003,550,0003,550,0003,550,000- 21,300,000
17,065,68118,233,00016,231,0289,442,00043,906,02826,060,200122,265,70037,910,400273,849,909
Recommended Regional Projects
N/A 80SR-167 Expansion (I405-SR509) - WSDOT
N/A 81SR-18 & SR-167 Interchange - WSDOT
N/A 82 SR-164 Corridor Improvements (SR-18 to Academy Drive) -
WSDOT
N/A 84 Green River Class I Trail, (SR-18 to Northern City Limit) - King
County
N/A 8551st Ave S & S 316th St Signal - King County
N/A 86North Tapps Corridor Widening (EVH to SR-167) - Pierce County
N/A 87Auburn Transit Station Parking Garage-SoundTransit
S = Secured
PS = Partially Secured
WA = Will Apply
A = Applied
'10 = Year
32,300,000
45,000,000
Cost
*Grant
Status
2,000,000
650,000
31,600,000
4,572,550,000
Construct Class I Trail along Green River from SR-18 to Northern City limits.
Construct new traffic signal at intersection of 51st Ave S and S 316th St with turn lanes.
Subtotal
TOTAL
Construct corridor improvements consistent with WSDOT SR-164 Corridor Improvement Study. Project includes intersection
improvements, roadway widening and roadside improvements.
Project Description
From I-405 to Sr-18, add one NB and SB general purpose lane; from SR-18 to SR-161, add one NB HOT lane and one SB HOT lane, add direct
NB/SB HOV/HOT lane connection ramps between SR-167 & I405; add NB and SB auxiliary lanes between SR516 and S 277th Street; extend
Sr 167 from SR-161 to SR-509.
Complete freeway interchange by adding eastbound SR-18 ramp to southbound SR-167, adding northbound SR-167 ramp to WB SR-18 and
closing SR-18 access to West Valley Highway.
TOTAL
Construct a new parking garage at the Auburn Transit Station
Complete a five lane section roadway with new bridge over the white river and railroad grade separation from EVH to SR-167.
Subtotal
Subtotal
61,000,000
4,400,000,000
Subtotal
Subtotal
Subtotal
Total Project Cost
City of Auburn 2012 - 2017 Transportation Improvement Program Project Summary
Project
Number TIP #Project Title Project Expenditures
Appendix A
RES.A
RES.A
EDGEWOOD
ALGONA
KING
COUNTY
PIERCE
COUNTY
KENT
PACIFIC
SUMNER
LAKE
TAPPS
SUPERMALL
MUCKLESHOOT
CASINO
167
167
18
18
O
ST
NE
PIKE
ST
NE
U
ST
S
E
H
ST
NE
N
ST
NE
EV
E
R
GR
EE
N
W
A
Y
S
E
118TH
AVE
SE
H
ST
SE
L
ST
NE
E
AST
BLVD
(B
OEING)
Z
ST
SE
FIR
S
T
S
E
54TH
AVE
S
W
ST
NW
E
ST
NE
5
7
T
H P L SE
G
ST
NE
56TH
AVE
S
T
ER
RACE
VIEW
LN
SE
A
ST
N
W
SE 320TH ST
5 0 T H
ST
S E
12TH ST SE
SE 304TH ST
5 1 S T S T S E
FRONTAGE
RD
S
2
9
7
T
H
P
L
A
S T E
D
ST
SE
104TH
AVE
SE
D
ST
SE
S 288TH ST
SE 299TH ST
6 7 T H S T S E
144TH
AVE
SE
PEARL
AVE
SE
F
ST
SE
PACIFIC
AVE
S
H
ST
SE
6 4 T H S T S E
22ND ST NE
SE 316TH ST
PIKE
ST
NW
142 N
D
AVE S E
M
ST
SE
G REE N
RIVER
R
D
SE
54TH
AVE
S
PERIMETER
RD
SW
WEST
BLVD
(BOEING)
37TH ST SE
U
S
T
N
W
C
ST
NE
STUCK RIVER DR SE
D
ST
SE
CLAY
ST
NW
SE 315TH PL
17TH ST SE
42ND ST NE
M
ST
NW
105TH
AVE
SE
107TH
PL
SE
H
ST
SE
105
T
H
P
L
S
E
E
ST
SW
S
30 0TH P L
SE 290TH ST
S E 299TH ST
18TH ST NE
1
26TH
A
V
E
SE
12TH ST SE
8TH ST SE
J
ST
SE
ELM LN SE
A
ST
SW
109
TH
PL
S
E
67TH LN
S
E
F
ST
SW
4
6
T
H
P
L
S
O
LIV
E
AV
E
SE
T
ST
SE
K
ST
SE
6TH ST NE
4 3RD ST NE
4TH ST SE
L
ST
NE
E V E R GREEN
W A Y S E
26TH ST NE
51 S T P L N E
14TH ST NE
SE 295TH ST
130TH
AVE
SE
S
2
96TH PL
L
ST
SE
51ST S T N E
S E
288TH PL
112TH
AVE
SE
56TH
AVE
S
25TH ST SE
ISA
A
C
AVE
S
E
20TH ST NE
57TH
PL
S
116TH
AVE
SE
61ST
AV
E
S
M D R
N E
OLIVE
AVE
S
E
SE 296TH WAY
L
ST
NE
S 292ND ST
W
ST
NW
K
ST
NE
28TH ST NE
33RD ST SE
66TH ST SE
SE
3 0 4TH
W A Y
N
S
T
SE
G
ST
NW
T
H
O
M
A
S
AVE
SE
5 9 T H ST SE
SE 296TH ST
4TH ST NE
26TH ST SE
7 2 N D S T SE
3 2ND ST SE
S 292ND ST
114TH
PL
SE
T
ST
SE
32ND ST NE
53RD ST SE
73 RD ST SE
63R D
P L S E
ELM
ST
SE
S 296TH ST
55 T H
AVE
S
SE 314TH PL
5 1 S T
S T S E
PIKE
ST
SE
56TH ST SE
21ST ST SE
23 RD ST SE
8TH ST NE
6 3 R D ST SE
52ND
PL
S
50T H S T N E
19TH DR N E
PANO
R
A
M
A
D
R
SE
S U P ERMALL DR SW
S K Y W A Y L N S E
1 9 T H
PL
SE
57TH ST S E
2 4 T H ST NW
S
29 2 N D S T
SE 307TH PL
30TH ST NE
20TH ST SE
30TH ST NE
SE 301ST ST
3 7 T H W A Y S E
104TH
AVE
SE
55TH ST SE
27TH S T SE
61ST ST SE
MAPLE DR SE
24TH ST NE
65TH ST SE
61
S
T
AVE
S
QUINCY
AVE
S E
28TH ST SE
2ND ST NW
26TH ST SE
LU
ND
RD
SW
2ND ST SE
SE 298TH PL
SE 293RD S T
85TH
AVE
S
SE 310TH ST
16TH ST SE
C
ST
SE
4TH ST NE
DOGWOOD
ST
SE
3 RD ST NE
9TH ST SE
2ND ST NE
K
ST
NE
4 9 T H S T N E
2ND ST E
64TH ST SE
K
ST
SE
1 7 T H S T S E
M
ST
NE
V
ST
SE
T
ST
NW
V
ST
SE
33RD ST SE
107TH
A
V
E
S
E
O
ST
NE
14TH ST
SE
G
ST
SE
33RD ST S E
S 296TH ST
K
ST
N
E
26TH ST NE
SE
298
T
H
P
L
D
ST
NE
16TH ST SE
SE 288TH ST
2ND ST SE
E
ST
SE
SE 304TH ST
E MAIN ST
55TH ST SE
11TH ST NE
S 310TH ST
SE 288TH ST
42ND ST NW
DOGWOOD
DR
SE
S
E
2
9
5
T
H ST
S 331ST S T
S 3 1 4 T H S T
20TH ST NW
7TH ST SE
15TH ST SE
A
ST
NE
15TH ST SE
2 4 T H S T SE
D
ST
SE
1 7 TH ST SE
R
ST
NE
B
ST
NE
56TH
AVE
S
E
ST
SE
8TH ST SE
D PL SE
32ND PL NE
13TH ST SE
SE 286TH ST
N
ST
SE
22ND ST SE
21ST ST SE
U
C
T
NW
3 2 N D S T S E
25TH ST SE
7 TH ST SE
R PL NE
56TH
A
V
E
S
H
ST
NW
N
ST
NE
K
ST
NE
J
ST
NE
SE 282ND ST
176TH
AVE
E
S 300TH ST
5TH ST NE
31ST ST SE
30TH ST SE
37TH ST S E
S 288TH ST
65TH
AVE
S
SE 297TH ST
S E 300TH ST
SE 286TH PL
S 324TH ST
44TH ST NW
SE 304TH ST
B PL NW
5 5TH ST SE
21ST ST SE
4TH ST SW
S 302ND PL
O
S
T
S
E
S 319TH ST
S
E
282ND S T
19TH ST S E
SE 43RD ST
30TH ST NW
SE 297TH ST
S 303RD PL
SE 307 T H ST
H
S
T
NE
SE 284TH ST
A L P I N E
DR
SE
4 5 T H S T NE
SE 281ST ST
SE 290TH PL
SE 42ND ST
28TH ST SE
WARD
AVE
SE
4 5 T H S T NE
OLYMPIC
ST
SE
J
ST
SE
6TH ST NW
57TH ST SE
S
E
289TH ST
S 312TH S T
SE 285TH ST
42ND ST NE
2 2 ND WAY NE
6 9 T H S T S E
SE 294TH ST
4 7 T H S T S E
23RD ST SE
SE 294TH PL
V
ST
NW
17TH ST NE
16TH ST NE
SE 286TH ST
S E 3 2 6 T H P L
S 318TH ST
G
ST
SE
EVER G R E E N W A Y
SE
RANDALL
AVE
S
E
22ND ST SE
23RD ST SE
24TH ST SE
25TH ST SE
HEATHER
AVE
SE
SE 282ND ST
21ST ST NE
36TH S T S E
SE
312
T
H
W
A
Y
102N
D
AV
E
S
E
37TH
PL SE
29TH ST NW
SE 301ST ST
SE 287TH ST
47TH ST SE
SE 284TH ST
H
O
W
A
R
D
R
D
S
E
I
ST
NW
140TH
AVE
SE
S 287TH ST
FOSTER
AVE
SE
6 0 T H S T SE
35TH W A Y SE
S E 321ST PL
SE 32 3 RD PL
K
ST
SE
1 08 TH
AVE
S E
L
ST
SE
SUPERMALL WAY SW
C
ST
SE
EA
ST
BLVD
(BOEING)
B
ST
SE
1
0
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
M
ST
NE
MONT
EV
IS
TA DR SE
D
ST
SW
108TH
AVE
SE
F
ST
NE
G
ST
SE
D
ST
SE
148TH
AVE
SE
B
ST
SE
I
ST
SE
F
ST
SE
1 1 1 T H
PL
SE
B
ST
SE
G
ST
SW
T
ST
NE
118
T
H
PL
SE
MILL
POND
DR
SE
110TH
AVE
SE
PERRY
A V E
SE
ACADE
M
Y
D
R
S
E
112TH
AVE
SE
G
ST
SE
G
PL
SE
D
S
T
S
E
HEMLOCK
ST
SE
116TH
AVE
SE
HA
Z
EL
AV
E
SE
59TH
AV
E
S
64TH
AVE
S
ELM
ST
SE
52ND
AVE
S
R
ST
NW
V
ST
NW
WEST
BLVD
(BOEING)
GINKGO
ST
SE
R I V E R D R
SE
55 T H
PL
S
128TH
PL
SE
57 T H D R
S
E
R
ST
NW
69TH ST S E
ELIZABETH
AVE
S
E
68T H S T S E
R I V E R V I E W DR NE
SCE
N
I
C
D
R
S
E
C
ST
S
E
R PL S
E
PIKE
ST
NE
DOGWOOD
ST
SE
V
CT
SE
111TH
AVE
SE
52ND
PL
S
D
ST
NE
J
ST
NE
L
ST
NE
L
ST
SE
SE 299TH PL
5
8
T
H
A
V
E
S
I
ST
NE
D
ST
SE
D
ST
NW
62ND LOOP
SE
1ST S T N E
BRIDGET
AVE
SE
108TH
AVE
SE
E
ST
NE
58TH
AVE
S
Q
UI
N
CY
AVE
SE
L
ST
SE
51ST
AVE
S
AAB Y D R NW
55TH
AVE
S
HIG
H
LAND
D
R
S
E
C
ST
NE
J
ST
NE
L A K E T A P P S PKWY SE
4 1 S T S T S E
BOUNDARY BLVD SW
ELLINGSON RD SW
M
ST
SE
M
ST
SE
A
ST
NE
PEASLE Y C ANYON RD
S
EMERALD
DOWNS
DR
NW
S E 3 0 4 TH ST
M
ST
NE
124TH
AVE
SE
C
ST
NW
15TH ST N E
D
ST
NW
D
ST
NE
R
ST
SE
A
U
B
U
R
N
W
A
Y
N
AUBURN
WAY
N
112TH
AVE
SE
51ST
AVE
S
AUBURN WAY S
15TH ST SW
132ND
AVE
SE
29TH ST SE
132ND
AVE
SE
K
E
R
S
E
Y
WAY SE
8 TH ST NE
W MAIN ST
L
A
K
E
L
A
N
D
H
I
L
L
S
W
A
Y
S
E
C
ST
S
W
15 T H ST S W
AUBURN
AVE
NE
A
S
T
S
E
C
S
T
SW
A
ST
SE
EA
ST
VALLEY
HW
Y
SE
E M AIN S T
I
ST
NE
H
A
R
V
E
Y
R
D
N
E
B
ST
NW
1 5TH S T S W
T E RRA
C
E
DR
NW
15 TH ST NW
37T H ST NW
15TH ST NW
AU
B
URN-BLACK DIAMOND RD SEWEST
V ALLEY
HWY
S
17TH ST SE
4TH S T SE
L
A
K
E
T
A
P
P
S
PKWY SE
O R A V E T Z
RD
SE
SE 281ST ST
RIVERWA L K D R
SE
S 316TH ST
LEA
HIL L R D S E
WEST
VALLEY
HWY
N
A
ST
NW
R
ST
SE
37TH ST NE
321ST ST S
P
E
A
S
L
E
Y
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
D
S
2
1
0
T
H
A
V
E
E
S 288TH ST
AUBURN
WAY
N
9TH S T E
1 6T H S T E
M
I
L
ITA
R
Y
R
D
S
51ST
AVE
S
S
2
7
2
N
D
W
AY
MILITARY
RD
S
M
I
L
ITA
R
Y
R
D
S
AUBU RN-BL A C K D I A M O N D
R D S E
2
1
4T
H
AVE
E
FOR E ST C ANYO
N R D E
A
U
B
U
R
N
-
E
N
U
M
C
L
A
W
R
D
S
SUMNER-TAPPS
H
W
Y
E
182ND
AVE
E
12TH ST E
116TH
AVE
SE
WEST
VALLEY
HWY
NW
S 328TH ST
ELLINGSON RD SW
SE 272ND STSE 272ND ST
WEST
VALLEY
HWY
S
W
EAST
V
A
L
L
EY
HWY
S
E
CEN
TRAL
AVE
S
S 272ND ST
124TH
AVE
SE
STEWART RD SE
S E 27 4 TH S T
38TH
AVE
S
S 277TH S T
24TH ST E
68TH
AVE
S
24TH ST E
8TH ST E
SE
KEN
T-KA
N
G
L
E
Y
R
D
142ND
AVE
E
108TH
AVE
SE
J O VITA
B
L
V
D E
S 277TH ST
2
62
3
18
19
52
87
44
21 8
38
38
51
58
41
15
39
60
64
12
9
4
16
40
14
61
10
42
6
65
1
66
11
5
7
81
84
82
81
80
86
85
86
80
47
47
54
46
49
23
56
24
20
25
43
63
17
Information shown is for general reference purposes
only and does not necessarily represent exact
geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The
City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy.
Map ID: 3829
Printed On: 11/29/11
City of Auburn 2012 - 2017 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
01,1002,2003,3004,4005,500
FEETIntersection Improvements
Non-Motorized Improvements
Prelim Eng and Misc Improvements
Recommended Regional Projects
Roadway Improvements
Signal & ITS Projects
City of Auburn
Parks
Water Features
Appendix B
RES.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4780
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4780 and Agreement
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4780.
Background Summary:
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health requests to enter into a contract with
the City of Auburn for the Local Hazardous Waste Management Program. King County
has extended $20,625.41 for the City to promote the Neighborhood Natural Yard Care
Program to one neighborhood and mail informational postcards to residents and
businesses.
1) Neighborhood Natural Yard Care Program.
This program has been delivered to seven neighborhoods in the past. Three workshop
presentations will be given to the Lakeland Hills neighborhood. The presentations will
focus on various yard care techniques that contribute to personal and environmental
health and safety. The Water and Storm Utilities also contribute resources to this
program.
2) Residential Hazardous Waste Postcard
The Residential Hazardous Waste Postcard will include information on proper disposal
of household hazardous waste, less toxic cleaning products, and options for disposing of
unwanted medicines. The postcard will be mailed to single-family, multi-family, and
mobile home park residents.
3) Business Hazardous Waste Postcard
The Business Hazardous Waste Postcard will include information on proper hazardous
waste disposal. The postcard will be mailed to all Auburn businesses.
F5.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Coleman
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.B
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:RES.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.B
RESOLUTION NO. 4780
A RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE A SERVICES CONTRACT WITH THE
SEATTLE-KING COUNTYDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
HEALTH FOR REIMBURSEMENT OF FUNDS RELATED
TO. 2012 LOCALHAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
WHEREAS, theSeattle King-County Department of Public Health has agreed to
reimburse the City of Auburn in the amount of $20,625.41 for costs associated with the
City's Local Hazardous Waste Management Program; and
WHEREAS in order to accept the moniesoffered by theSeattle-King, County
Department of Public Health, it is necessary for the City to enter into a services contract
which specifiestheadministrative proceduresgoverning the reimbursement of funds
spent in the City's Local Hazardous Waste Management Program.
THECITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IN A
REGULARMEETING DULY ASSEMBLED HEREWITH RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS
Section 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Auburn are authorized to
execute the King County Contract for Services, a copy of which is attachedhereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.
Section 2. TheMayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry outthe directions of this legislation, including
providing for the expenditure and appropriationtherefore in appropriatebudget
documents.
Resolution No. 4780
November 29, 2011
Page 1 of 2
RES.B
Section 3. This Resolution shallbe in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day of 2011
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPR• f DA TO FORM:
Oriel B. He
City Attorney
Resolution No. 4780
November 29, 2011
Page 2 of 2
RES.B
Public HealthSeattle & King County
King County Contract No. EHS2298
Federal Taxpayer ID No. 91-6001228
This form is available in alternate formats for people with disabilities upon request.
KING COUNTY CONTRACT FOR SERVICES WITH OTHER GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION,
OR JURISDICTION — 2012
Department I Seattle-King County Dept. of PublicHealth (a.k.a. Public Health—Seattle & King
Division County)/EHS
Contractor City of Auburn
Project Title LocalHazardous Waste Management Program
Contract Amount TwentyThousand SixHundred Twenty.Five Dollars and Forty One Cents
Contract Period Start date: 01/01/2012 End date: 12/31/2012
THIS CONTRACT is entered into by KING COUNTY (the "County"), and City of Auburn (the
Contractor"), whoseaddress is 25 W Main St. Auburn, WA 98001-4998.
WHEREAS, the County has been advised that the following are thecurrent fundingsources, funding
levels and effectivedates:
FUNDING SOURCES FUNDING LEVELS EFFECTIVEDATES
COUNTY
HWIncorporated Cities 20,625.41 1/1/2012 12/31/2012
TOTAL I 20,625.41 1/1/2012 12/31/2012
and
WHEREAS, the Countydesires tohave certain services performed by the Contractor as described in this
Contract, and as authorized by the 2012 Annual Budget.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of payments, covenants, and agreementshereinafter mentioned,
to be made and performed by the parties hereto, the partiescovenant anddo mutually agree as follows:
I Incorporation of Exhibits
The Contractor shall provideservices and comply withtherequirements set forth in the following
attachedexhibits, which are incorporated herein by reference:
A Program Exhibits and Requirements
Exhibit A. Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Budget
Exhibit C: Invoice
B King County Required Forms
Exhibit D: Certificate of Insurance and Additional Insured Endorsement
II Term and Termination
A This Contract shall commence on 01/01/2012, and shall terminate on 12/31/2012, unless extended
or terminated earlier pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Contract.
Contract# EHS2298 Page# 1 of 9
RES.B
B This Contract may be terminated by the either party without cause, in whole or in part, priorto the
date specified in Subsection II.A. above, by providing the other party thirty (30)daysadvance
written notice of the termination.
C The Countymay terminate this Contract, in whole or in part, upon seven (7) days advance written
notice in the event: (1) the Contractormaterially breachesanydutyobligation, orservice required
pursuant to this Contract, or(2) theduties, obligations, or services required herein become
impossible, illegal, or not feasible.
If the Contract is terminated by the County pursuant to thisSubsection II.C. (1), the Contractor
shall be liable fordamages, includinganyadditionalcosts of procurement of similar services from
another source.
If the termination results fromacts oromissions of theContractor including but not limitedto
misappropriation, nonperformance of required services, or fiscal mismanagement, the Contractor
shall return to the Countyimmediately any funds, misappropriated orunexpended, which have
beenpaid totheContractor by the County
D If Countyor other expected oractualfunding is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in anywayprior to
the termination date set forth above in Subsection II.A. the County may upon written notification
totheContractorterminate this Contract in whole or in part.
If the Contract is terminated as provided in thisSubsection: (1) the County will be liableonly for
payment in accordance with theterms of this Contract for services rendered prior to the effective
date of termination; and (2)theContractor shall be released from any obligation to provide such
further services pursuanttotheContract as are affected by the termination.
Funding or obligation under this Contract beyond thecurrent appropriationyear is conditional upon
appropriation by the CountyCouncil of sufficient funds to supportthe activities described in the
Contract. Should such appropriation not be approved, this Contract will terminate at the close of
thecurrent appropriation year
E Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy provided by this Contractor law
that either party may have in the event that the obligations, terms, and conditions set forth in this
Contract are breached by the other party
III Compensation and Method of Payment
A The County shall reimbursethe Contractor for satisfactory completion of the services and
requirementsspecified in this Contract, payable in the following manner
Upon receipt and approval of a signed invoice asset forth in Exhibit C that complies with the
budget in Exhibit B.
B The Contractor shall submit an invoice and all accompanying reports as specified in the attached
exhibits notmore than 60 working days after the close of each indicatedreporting period. The
County will initiate authorization for payment afterapproval of correctedinvoices and reports. The
County shall make payment to the Contractor not more than 30 daysafter a complete and
accurate invoice is received.
C The Contractor shall submit its final invoice andall outstandingreports within 90 days of the date
this Contractterminates. If the Contractor's final invoice andreportsare not submitted by theday
specified in thissubsection, the County will be relieved of all liability forpayment to theContractor
ofthe amounts set forth in said invoiceor any subsequent invoice.
D When a budget is attached hereto as an exhibit, the Contractor shall apply the funds received from
the Countyunder this Contract in accordancewith said budget. The contract may contain
separate budgets for separateprogram components. The Contractor shall request prior approval
from the County for an amendment to this Contractwhen the cumulative amount of transfers
among the budget categories is expected to exceed 10% of the Contractamount in anyContract
Contract# EHS2298 Page#2 of 9
RES.B
budget. Supportingdocumentsnecessary to explainfullythe nature and purpose of the
amendment must accompany each request for an amendment.
E If travel costs are contained in the attached budget, reimbursement of Contractortravel, lodging,
and meal expenses arelimitedto the eligiblecosts based on thefollowing ratesand criteria.
1 The mileage rate allowed byKing County shallnot exceed the current Internal Revenue
Service (IRS) rates per mile as allowed for business related travel. The IRS mileage rate
shall be paid for the operation, maintenance and depreciation of individually owned vehicles
for that time which the vehicle is used during work hours. Parking shall be the actualcost.
When rental vehicles are authorized, government rates shall be requested. If the Contractor
does not request government rates, the Contractor shall be personally responsible for the
difference. Please reference the federal web site for currentrates: http://www.gsa.gov
2 Reimbursement formeals shall be limitedto the per diem rates established by federal travel
requisitions for the host city in the Code of Federal Regulations, 41 CFR § 301 App.A.
3 Accommodation rates shall not exceed the federallodging limit plus host city taxes. The
Contractor shall alwaysrequest government rates.
4 Airtravel shall be by coach class at the lowest possible price available at the time the
Countyrequests a particular trip. In general, a trip is associatedwith a particular work activity
of limitedduration and only one round-trip ticket, perperson, shall be billed per trip.
IV Internal Control and Accounting System
The Contractor shall establish and maintain a system of accounting and internal controls which complies
with applicable, generallyacceptedaccountingprinciples, and governmental accounting and financial
reporting standards.
V Debarmentand Suspension Certification
Agencies receiving federal funds that are debarred, suspended, orproposed for debarmentare excluded
from contracting withthe County The Contractor by signature to thisContract, certifies that the
Contractor is notpresentlydebarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by anyFederal department
oragency The Contractor also agrees that it will not enter into a subcontract with a contractor that is
debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment. The Contractor agrees tonotify King County in the
event it, or a subcontractor is debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment by any Federal
department or agency For more information on suspension and debarment, see Federal Acquisition
Regulation 9.4.
VI Maintenance of Records/Evaluations and Inspections
A The Contractor shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property financial, and
programmatic records and other such records as may be deemed necessary by the County to
ensureproper accountingfor all Contract funds and compliance with this Contract.
B In accordance withthenondiscrimination and equal employment opportunity requirements set forth
in Section XIVbelowthe Contractor shallmaintain the following:
1 Records of employment, employment advertisements, applicationforms, and other pertinent
data, records and information related to employment, applications for employment or the
administration or delivery of services or any other benefits under thisContract; and
2 Records, including writtenquotes, bids, estimatesor proposals submitted to the Contractor
by all businesses seeking to participate on this Contract, and any other information
necessary to document the actual use of and payments to subcontractors and suppliers in
thisContract, including employment records.
The County may visit, at any mutuallyagreeable time, the site of thework and the Contractor's
office to review the foregoing records. The Contractor shallprovide every assistance requested by
theCountyduringsuch visits. In all other respects, the Contractor shallmake theforegoing
Contract# EHS2298 Page# 3 of 9
RES.B
records available to the Countyfor inspection and copying upon request. If this Contract involves
federal funds, the Contractor shall comply with all record keeping requirements set forth in any
federal rules, regulations or statutes includedorreferenced in the contract documents.
C Except as provided in Section VII of this Contract, the records listed in A and B above shall be
maintained for a period of six (6)yearsafter termination hereof unless permission to destroy them
is granted by the Office ofthe Archivist in accordance with Revised Code of Washington (RCW)
Chapter 40.14
D Medical records shall be maintained and preserved by the Contractor in accordance with state and
federal medical records statutes, including but not limited to RCW 70.41 190, 70.02.160, and
standardmedicalrecords practice. If the Contractorceases operations under this Contract, the
Contractor shall be responsible for the disposition and maintenance of suchmedical records.
E The Contractor agrees to cooperate withthe County or its agent in the evaluation of the
Contractor's performance under this Contract and to make available all information reasonably
required by any such evaluation process. Theresults and records of said evaluations shall be
maintained and disclosed in accordancewith RCW Chapter 42.56.
F TheContractor agreesthat all information, records, and data collected in connection with this
Contract shall be protected fromunauthorized disclosure in accordance withapplicable state and
federal law
VII Compliance with theHealth Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAAI
The Contractor shall not use protected health information created or shared under this Contract in any
manner that would constitute a violation of HIPAA and any regulations enactedpursuant to its
provisions. Contractor shall read and certify compliance with all HIPAA requirements at
http://www.kingcounty.gov/healthservices/health/partnerships/contracts
VIII Audits
A If the Contractor or subcontractor is a municipal entityor othergovemment institution or
jurisdiction, or is a non-profit organization as defined in OMB Circular A-133, and expends a total
of$500,000or more in federalfinancial assistance and has received federalfinancial assistance
from the County during its fiscal year then the Contractor or subcontractor shall meet the
respective A-133 requirements described in subsections VIII.B. and VIII.C.
B If the Contractor is a non-profit organization, it shallhave an independentauditconducted of its
financial statement and condition, which shall comply with the requirements of GAAS (generally
accepted auditingstandards); GAO's Standards for Audits of GovernmentalOrganizations,
Programs, Activities, and Functions; and OMB Circular A-133, as amended, and as applicable.
The Contractor shall provide a copy of theaudit report to each County division providing financial
assistance to the Contractor no later than six (6) months subsequent to the end of the Contractor's
fiscalyear The Contractor shallprovide tothe County its response and corrective action plan for
all findings and reportable conditions contained in its audit. Whenreference is made in its audit to
a "Management Letter"or othercorrespondence made by theauditor the Contractor shall provide
copies of those communications and the Contractor's response and corrective action plan.
Submittal of these documents shall constitute compliance with subsection VIII.A.
C If the Contractor is a municipal entityor other government institutionor jurisdiction, it shallsubmit
to the County a copy of its annual report of examination/audit, conducted by the Washington State
Auditor withinthirty (30) days of receipt, whichsubmittal shall constitute compliancewith
subsection VIII.A.
D If theContractor for-profit or non-profit, receives in excess of$100,000 in funds during its fiscal
year from the County it shall provide a fiscal year financialstatement prepared by an independent
Certified Public Accountant orAccounting Firm within six (6) months subsequent to theclose of the
Contractor's fiscal year
Contract# EHS2298 Page#4 of 9
RES.B
E Additionalaudit orreview requirementswhich maybe imposed on the County will be passed on to
the Contractor andthe Contractor will be requiredto comply withany such requirements.
IX Corrective Action
If the County determines that a breach of contract has occurred, that is, the Contractor has failedto
comply with any terms or conditions of this Contractor theContractor has failed to provide in any
manner the work orservices agreed to herein, and if the County deems said breach to warrantcorrective
action, the following sequential procedure will apply.
A TheCounty willnotifythe Contractor in wilting of the nature of the breach;
TheContractor shall respond in writing within three (3)working days of its receipt of such
notification, which response shall indicate the steps being taken to correct thespecified
deficiencies. Thecorrective action plan shall specify the proposed completiondate for bringingthe
Contract into compliance, which date shall not be more than ten (10) days from the date of the
Contractors response, unless the Countyat its sole discretion, specifies in writing an extension in
the number of days to complete the correctiveactions;
B The County willnotifythe Contractor in writing of the County's determination as to thesufficiency
ofthe Contractor's corrective action plan. Thedetermination of sufficiency of the Contractor's
corrective action plan shall be at the sole discretion of the County-
C In theevent that the Contractor does not respond within the appropriatetime with a corrective
action plan, or the Contractor's corrective action`plan is determined by theCounty to be
insufficient, the County may commence termination of this Contract in whole or in part pursuant to
Section II.0
D In addition, the County may withholdanypayment owed the Contractor or prohibit the Contractor
fromincurring additionalobligations of funds until the County is satisfied that correctiveaction has
been taken or completed; and
E Nothing herein•shall be deemed to affectorwaive anyrights the partiesmayhave pursuant to
Section II. Subsections B, C, D, and E.
X Dispute Resolution
The partiesshall use their best, good-faith efforts to cooperatively resolve disputes and problems that
arise in connectionwiththis Contract. Both parties willmake agood faith effort to continue without delay
to carryout their respectiveresponsibilities underthis Contract while attempting to resolvethedispute
under this section.
XI Hold Harmless and Indemnification
A In providing services under this Contract, the Contractor is an independent Contractor and neither
it nor its officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors are employees of the County for any
purpose. The Contractor shall be responsible for all federal and/or state tax, industrialinsurance,
and Social Security liability that may result fromthe performance of and compensation for these
services and shall make no claim of career service or civil service rights which may accrueto a
Countyemployee under state or local law
The County assumes no responsibility for thepayment of any compensation, wages, benefits, or
taxes by or on behalf of the Contractor its employees, subcontractors and/or others by reason of
thisContract. TheContractor shall protect, indemnify and save.harmless theCounty its officers,
agents, and employees from and against any andall claims, costs, and/or losses whatsoever
occurringor resultingfrom (1) the Contractor's failure to payany such compensation, wages,
benefits, ortaxes, and/or (2) the supplying to the Contractor of work, services, materials, or
supplies by Contractor employees or othersuppliers in connectionwithor support of the
performance of this Contract.
B TheContractor further agrees that it is financiallyresponsible for and will repay the County all
indicated amountsfollowing an auditexception which occurs due to thenegligence, intentionalact,
Contract#EHS2298 Page#5 of 9
RES.B
and/or failure, for anyreason, to comply with the terms of this Contract by the Contractor its
officers, employees, agents, or subcontractors. This duty to repay the County shall not be
diminishedor extinguished by the prior termination of theContractpursuant to the Duration of
Contract or the Termination section.
C The Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County its officers, employees, and
agents from any andall costs, claims,judgments, and/orawards of damages, arising out of, or in
any way resulting from, the negligent acts or omissions of the Contractor its officers, employees,
subcontractors and/or agents in its performance or non-performance of its obligations underthis
Contract In the eventthe County incursany judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom
including attorneys' fees to enforce the provisions of this article, allsuch fees, expenses, and costs
shall be recoverable from the Contractor
D The Countyshalldefend, indemnify and hold harmless theContractor its officers, employees, and
agents from any and all costs, claims,judgments, and/orawards of damages, arise out of, or in
anyway result from, the negligent acts or omissions of the County its officers, employees, or
agents in its performance or non-performance of its obligations under this Contract. In the event
the Contractor incurs any judgment, award, and/or cost arising therefrom including attorneys' fees
to enforce the provisions of thisarticle, all suchfees, expenses, and costs shall be recoverable
from the County
E Claims shall include, but not be limited to, assertions that use or transfer of software, book,
document, report, film, tape, or sound reproduction ormaterial of any kind, delivered hereunder
constitutes an infringement of any copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/orotherwise
results in unfairtrade practice.
F Nothing contained within this provision shall affect and/or alterthe application of any other
provision contained withinthis Contract.
G Theindemnification, protection, defense andsave harmless obligations contained herein shall
survive the expiration, abandonment or termination of this Agreement.
XII InsuranceRequirements
By the date of execution of thisContract, the Contractor shall procure and maintain for theduration of
this Contract, insurance against claimsforinjuries to personsordamages to property which may arise
from, or in connection with, the performance of workhereunder by the Contractor its agents,
representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. The costs of such insurance shall be paid by the
Contractor or subcontractor TheContractor may fumish separate certificates of insurance and policy
endorsements for each subcontractor as evidence of compliance with the insurance requirements of this
Contract. The Contractor is responsible for ensuring compliance with all of the insurance requirements
stated herein. Failure by the Contractor its agents, employees, officers, subcontractors, providers,
and/or providersubcontractors to complywiththe insurancerequirements stated herein shall constitute a
material breach of this Contract. Specific coverages and requirements are at
http://www.kingcounty.gov/healthservices/health/partnerships/contracts; contractors shall readand
certify compliance.
XIII Assianment/Subcontractinq
A The Contractor shall not assignor subcontract anyportion of this Contract or transfer or assign
anyclaimarising pursuant tothis Contract without the writtenconsent of the County Said consent
must be sought in writing by the Contractor not less than fifteen (15)days prior to thedate of any
proposed assignment.
B 'Subcontract" shall mean any agreement between the Contractor anda subcontractor or between
subcontractors that is based on thisContract, provided thatthe term "subcontract"does not
includethe purchase of(1) supportservices not related to the subject matter of this Contract, or(2)
supplies.
Contract# EHS2298 Page#6 of 9
RES.B
C The Contractor shall include Sections III.D. IV V VI, VII, VIII, XI, XII, XIV XV XXI, and XXV in
every subcontract or purchase agreement for services that relate to the subject matter of this
Contract.
D TheContractoragrees to include the following languageverbatim in every subcontract, provider
agreement, orpurchaseagreement for serviceswhich relate tothe subject matter of this Contract:
Subcontractor shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold harmless King County its officers,
employees and agents fromany and all costs, claims,judgments, and/orawards of damages
arising out of, or in any way resulting from the negligent act oromissions of subcontractor its
officers, employees, and/or agents in connectionwithor in support of thisContract. Subcontractor
expressly agrees and understandsthat King County is a third party beneficiary to this Contract and
shall have the right to bringan actionagainst subcontractor to enforce theprovisions of this
paragraph.
XIV Nondiscrimination andEqual Employment Opportunity
The Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state andlocal lawsregarding discrimination,
including those set forth in this Section.
During performance of the Contract, the Contractor agrees that it will not discriminateagainst any
employee or applicant for employment because of the employee or applicant's sex, race, colormarital
status, national origin, religious affiliation, disability sexual orientation, genderidentity orexpressionor
age except by minimum age and retirementprovisions, unless based upon a bona fide occupational
qualification. TheContractor willmake equal employmentopportunityefforts to ensurethat applicants
and employees are treated, without regard to their sex, race, color marital status, national origin,
religious affiliation, disability sexual orientation, gender identity or expressionor age. Additional
requirements areat http://www.kingcounty.gov/healthservices/health/partnerships/contracts; contractors
shall readand certify compliance.
XV Conflict of Interest
A The Contractor agrees to comply with applicable provisions of K.C.C. 3.04 Failure to comply with
such requirements shall be a material breach of this contract, and may result in termination of this
Contract pursuant to Section II and subject the Contractor to theremedies stated therein, or
otherwiseavailable to the County at law or in equity
B The Contractor agrees, pursuant to KCC 3.04.060, that it will not willfullyattempt to secure
preferential treatment in its dealings with the County by offering any valuableconsideration, thing
of value or gift, whether in the form of services, loan, thing orpromise, in any form to anycounty
official or employee. The Contractor acknowledges that if it is found tohave violated the
prohibition found in thisparagraph, its current contractswith the countywill be cancelled and it
shall not be ableto bidon any county contract for a period of two years.
C TheContractoracknowledges that forone year after leaving County employment, a former county
employee may not have a financial or beneficial interest in a contract orgrant that was planned,
authorized, orfunded by a countyaction in whichthe formercounty employeeparticipatedduring
county employment. Contractor shall identify at the time of offer current or former County
employees involved in the preparation of proposalsor the anticipated performance of Work if
awarded the Contract. Failure to identify current or former Countyemployees involved in this
transaction may result in the County's denying or terminating thisContract. After Contract award,
the Contractor is responsible for notifying the County's Project Manager of currentor former
County employees who maybecome involved in the Contract any time duringthe term of the
Contract.
XVI Equipment Purchase, Maintenance, and Ownership
A The Contractor agreesthatany equipment purchased, in whole or in part, with Contract fundsat a
cost of$5,000 per item or more, when the purchase of such equipment is reimbursable as a
Contractbudget item, is upon its purchase orreceipt the property of the County and/or
Contract#EHS2298 Page#7 of 9
RES.B
federal/state government. TheContractor shall be responsible for all such propertyincluding the
proper care and maintenance of the equipment.
B TheContractor shall ensure that all such equipment will be returned to theCountyor federal/state
government upon termination of this Contract unless otherwise agreed upon by theparties.
XVII Proprietary Rights
The partiestothis Contract hereby mutually agree that if any patentable or copyrightable material or
article shouldresult from the work described herein, all rights accruing from such material or article shall
be the sole property of the party that produces such materialorarticle. If any patentableor
copyrightable materialorarticle should result from the work described herein and is jointly produced by
both parties, all rights accruing from such materialor article shall be owned in accordance with US
Patent Law. Each party agrees to and does hereby grant to the other party irrevocable, nonexclusive,
and royalty-free license to use, according to law anymaterialor article and useany method that may be
developed as part of the workunder this Contract.
The foregoingproducts licenseshall not apply to existingtraining materials, consulting aids, checklists,
and other materials and documents of the Contractor which are modified for use in the performance of
this Contract.
The foregoing provisions of thissection shall not apply to existing training materials, consulting aids,
checklists, and other materials and documents of the Contractor that are not modified for use in the
performance of this Contract.
XVIII Political Activity Prohibited
None of the funds, materials, propertyor services provided directly or indirectly under this Contract shall
be used for anypartisan politicalactivity or to furtherthe election or defeat of any candidate for public
office.
XIX King County Recycled Product Procurement Policy
In accordance withKing CountyCode 10.16, the Contractor shall use recycled paper for the production
of all printed and photocopieddocuments related to the fulfillment of this Contract. In addition, the
Contractor shall use both sides of paper sheets for copying and printing and shalluse
recycled/recyclable products wherever practical in the fulfillment of this Contract.
XX Future Support
TheCounty makes no commitmentto support the services contracted for herein and assumes no
obligation for futuresupport of the activity contracted herein except as expressly set forth in this
Contract.
XXI Entire Contract/Waiver of Default
Theparties agree that this Contract is the complete expression of the terms hereto and any oral or
written representations or understandings not incorporated herein are excluded. Both partiesrecognize
that time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Contract. Waiver of any default
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequentdefault. Waiver or breach of anyprovision of the
Contract shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach and shall not be
construed to be a modification of theterms of the Contract unless statedto besuch throughwritten
approval by the County whichshall be attached to the original Contract.
XXII Contract Amendments
Either party may request changes to this Contract. Proposed changes which are mutually agreed upon
shall be incorporated by writtenamendments to this Contract.
XXIII Notices
Whenever this Contract provides for notice to be provided by one party to another such notice shall be
in writing and directed to the chief executive office of the Contractor and the projectrepresentative of the
Contract# EHS2298 Page#8 of 9
RES.B
County department specified onpage one of this Contract. Anytimewithin which a party must take some
action shall be computed fromthe date that thenotice is received by said party
XXIV Services Provided in Accordance with Law and Rule and Regulation
The Contractor and any subcontractor agree to abide by the laws of thestate of Washington, rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder and regulations of the state and federal governments, as
applicable, which controldisposition of funds granted under this Contract, all of whichare incorporated
herein by reference.
In the event that there is a conflict betweenany of the language contained in any exhibitor attachment to
this Contract, the language in the Contract shallhave control over the language contained in the exhibit
or the attachment, unlessthe parties affirmatively agree in writing to thecontrary
XXV Applicable Law
This contractshall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of theState of Washington.
The venue for any action hereunder shall be in the Superior Court for King CountyWashington.
XXVI No Third Party Beneficiaries
Except for theparties to whom this contract is assigned in compliance with the terms of this contract,
there are no third party beneficiaries tothis contract, and this contract shall not impart any rights
enforceable by any person or entity that is not a party hereto.
IN WITNESS HEREOFthe parties hereby agree to theterms and conditions of this Contract:
KING COUNTY City of Auburn
FOR _
King County Executive Signature
Date NAME (Please type or print)
Date
Approved as to Form. Cfr
OFFICE OF THEKING COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
PHSKC Contract# EHS2298 Local Hazardous Waste Management Program
Contract# EHS2298 Page#9 of 9
RES.B
J;
Ij
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF AUBURN
2012 SCOPE OF WORK
The Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan (hereafterreferred to as the `Plan") as updated in
1997 and 2010, was adopted by the partner agencies(King CountySolid Waste Division, Seattle
Public Utilities, King County Water and Land Resources Division and the Seattle-King County
Department of Public Health) and cities located in King County TheWashington State
Department of Ecology inaccordance with RCW 70.105.220 subsequently approved the Plan.
The City is an active and valued partner in the regional Local Hazardous Waste Management
Program (hereafter referred to as the `Program").
The purpose of this Exhibit is to define the terms and conditions associated with the Program's
funding of City activities performed under the auspices of thePlan and as approvedby the
Program's Management Coordination Committee(hereinafter referred to as the `MCC"). This
Agreement further defines the responsibilities of the City and Seattle-King County Department
of Public Health with respect to the transfer of Program monies.
Scope of Work
The City of Auburn will assist in the promotion of natural yard caretoone Auburn
neighborhood, and create and mail a postcard to Auburn residents on the Wastemobile
information, alkaline battery and compact fluorescent light bulb disposal, disposal options for
unwanted medicines, and alternative cleaning supplies.
The City will also create and mail a postcard about hazardouswaste disposal to Auburn
businesses.
Responsibilities of the Parties
The responsibilities of the parties to this Contract shall be as follows:
A. The City
1 The City shall develop and submit project proposals and budget requests to the
Program's Contract Administrator Funds provided to the City by the Local Hazardous
Waste Management Program pursuant to thisContract shall be used to implement
hazardouswaste programs and/or services as approvedby the MCC.
2. For reimbursement the City shall submit the following to the Fund Manager
a) An invoice(see Exhibit I11). Invoices should be sent to the Fund Manager for
approval and payment.
b) A brief description of activity accomplished and funds expended in
accordance with the scope of work.
c) Copies of invoices for expenditures or a financial statement prepared by the
City's finance department. The financial statements should include vendor
EHS2298—City of Auburn 1
RES.B
names, a description of services',provided, date.paid and a check orwarrant
number
3 The City shall notify the Fund Manager no later than December 15th regarding the amount of
outstandingexpenditures for which the City has not yet submitted a reimbursement request.
4 It is the responsibility of the City to comply with all applicable county state and/or federal
reporting requirements with respect to the collection and transfer of moderate risk wastes.
The City shall report to the Contract Administrator the quantity by type,of moderate risk
waste collected using Program funds. The City shallalso provide the Contract Administrator
with copies of EPA's Non-Hazardous Waste Manifest or similar form, associated with the
transport of moderate risk waste collected through Program-funded events.
5 The City is solely responsible for any and all spills, leaks or other emergencies arising at the
facilities associated with the City's events or in any other way associated with activities
conducted within thescope of thisContract. In the event of a spill or other emergency the
City is responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations.
6. The City agrees to appropriately acknowledge the Program in all mediaproduced—in part or
in whole—with Programfunds. The intent of this provision is to further strengthen this
regionalpartnership in the public's mind.
7 The City agrees to provide the Program with copies of all media material produced for local
hazardouswaste managementevents or activities that have been funded bythe Program. The
City also agrees to allow the Programtoreproducemedia materials created with Program
money provided that the Program credits the City as the originator of that material.
8. This project shall be administered by Joan Nelson at the City of Auburn, 25 W Main Street,
Auburn, at(253) 931 5103, (jenelson @auburnwa.gov) or herdesignee.
9 Questions or concerns regarding any issue associated with this Exhibit that cannot be handled
by the Contract Administrator or Fund Manager should be referred to the LHWMP Program
Administrator for resolution.
B. Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
1 Seattle-King County Department of Public Health shall administervia the attached
Contract, the transfer of Program funds to the City for hazardouswaste management
events and activities.
2. Within ten (10) working days of receiving a request for reimbursement from the City
the Fund Manager shall either notify the City of any exceptions to the request which
have been identified or shall process the request for payment. If any exceptions to the
request are made, this shall be done by written notification to the City,providing the
reason for such exception. The Fund Manager will not authorize payment for activities
and/or expenditures that are not included inthe scope of work, unlessthe scope has been
amended. The Fund Manager retains the right to withhold all orpartial payment if the
City's invoices are incomplete (e,g. they do not include proper documentation of
expenditures for which reimbursement is being requested)or are not consistent with the
submitted scope of work.
C. Program Contacts
EHS2298—City of Auburn 2
RES.B
Jay Watson Madelaine Yun
LHWMP Program Administrator LHWMP Fund Manager
150 Nickerson Street, Suite 100 150 Nickerson Street, Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98109 Seattle, WA 98109
206-352-8163 206-3527128
iay.watson a.kingcountv.aov madelaine.vun@kingcountv.gov
Paul Shallow
LHWMP Contract Administrator
401 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1100
Seattle, WA 98104
206-263-8487
paul.shal lowekingcoimtv.gov
EHS2298—City of Auburn 3
RES.B
EXHIBIT B
2012 BUDGET
LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The City of Auburn
25 W Main Street,
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
Component Description Budget
Household Hazardous Waste Education 20,625.41
Household Hazardous Waste Collection i
TOTAL 20,625.41
EHS2298—City of Auburn
RES.B
EXHIBIT C
2012 INVOICE
LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
From: The City of Auburn
25 W Main Street,
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
To: Madelaine Yun, LHWMP Fund Manager
Local Hazardous Waste Management Program in King County
Seattle-King County Department of Public Health
150 Nickerson St. Suite 100
Seattle, WA 98109
Contract#EHS2298
Period of time: 2012 to 2012.
In performance of a signed Contract between King County and the City of Auburn, I hereby certify that
the following expenses were incurred during the above-mentioned period of time.
Signature Date
Component Budget Current Expenses Previous Charges Balance
Description
Household Hazardous" $20,625 41
Waste Education
Household Hazardous
Waste Collection
TOTAL 20,625 41
For HealthDepartment Use Only
Local Hazardous Waste Management Program Approval:
Madelaine Yun Date
EHS2298—City of Auburn
RES.B
EXHIBIT D
A
Insurance Authority
ptl sso 11
11 d: da. \1-\ n
I 4-Mar I I Cert)f' _3a
0!e
if
hill_' C otlltt\
WI. Leah \cut man
401 CO) \x Strati I +00
1,altle 1\ 11)$104
Kr Cu' of \uburn
I oral I-laiardous 11 aste \ianagemenl Program
Evidence of Coverage
I he abut captioned emit\ is a member of the 1\ ashmgton C10es Insurance authorit\
1'C \I. which Is a sell insured pool of over I C) municipalcorporations in the State of
ashingtnn.
C IA has at least S I million per occurrence combined single limit of liability co\-crage
in its sell insured laver that ma\ be applicable in the etent an incident occurs thatis
deemed to be attributed to the negligence of the member
CIA is an hnerlocal Agreement among municipalities and Itabilit is completely sell
lunded b\ the membeiship. As there is no insurance polies involved and WCIA is not
an insurance eonyxut\ mar organization cannot he named as an additional insured'
Sincere]\
eli
I.ric 13 I arson
Deputy Director
cc Brenda Heineman
loan \elson
dot.
x
RES.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4781
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4781 and Agreement
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4781.
Background Summary:
King County requests to enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Auburn for
the 2012-2013 Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Program. King County has
appropriated $112,772.00 for the City to promote waste reduction and recycling to
residents, schools, and businesses.
The City of Auburn will put $40,000 towards funding four Residential Recycling Events.
The events are held in the spring and fall each year and give residents the opportunity to
recycle items such as scrap metal, bulky wood waste, appliances, tires, mattresses,
styrofoam, and concrete. The remainder of the Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant
will provide funding for the following programs: Residential Recycling, Environmental
Education in Auburn Schools, Public Place Recycling, Multifamily Recycling, Business
Recycling, and the City of Auburn Going Green Program.
F5.3, O47.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:RES.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.C
RESOLUTION NO. 4781
A RESOLUTION OF THECITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE
AND APPROPRIATION OF GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF
ONE HUNDRED TWELVE THOUSAND SEVENHUNDRED
SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS ($112,772.00), AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL
AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF
AUBURN TO ACCEPT SAID FUNDS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF
THE 2012-2013 WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLING GRANT
PROGRAM
WHEREAS, King County and the City of Auburn have adopted the King
County Solid Waste Management Plan, which includes recycling and waste
reduction goals; and
WHEREAS, in order to help meet these goals, the King County Solid
Waste Division has established a multi-phased waste reduction and recycling
grant program for the suburban cities; and
WHEREAS, thisprogramprovides funding to further the development of
local wastereduction andrecycling for Auburn businesses and residents; and
WHEREAS, theAuburn City Council oftheCityofAuburn must adopt
and approve all appropriations by Ordinance pursuant to Chapter 35A.33 RCW
and
NOW THEREFORE, THECITY COUNCIL OF THECITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Resolution No. 4781
November 29, 2011
Page 1
RES.C
Section 1. Pursuant to Chapter 35A.33 RCW the City herebyapproves
the expenditure and appropriation of a total amount of ONEHUNDRED
TWELVE THOUSAND AND SEVEN HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS
112,772.00) which constitutes reimbursement of funds for implementing the
2012-2013 Waste Reduction and Recycling Grant Program.
Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk ofthe City ofAuburn are
authorized to execute an Interlocal Agreement with King County for the
reimbursement of said funds. A copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and
designated Contract # 529817 and is incorporated by reference herein.
Section 3. The Mayor is herebyauthorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary tocarryout directions of the
legislation.
Section 4. ThisResolution shall take effect and be in force five (5) days
from and after its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law
Resolution No. 4781
November 29, 2011
Page 2
RES.C
Dated and Signed this day of 2011
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
0
APP"OVED Al ' FORM:
1 Il.
Daniel B. He's,
City Attorney
Resolution No. 4781
November 29, 2011
Page 3
RES.C
CONTRACT ti 529817
INTERAGENCYAGREEMENT FOR 2012-2013
Between
KING COUNTY and the CITY OF AUBURN
This two-year Interagency Agreement Agreement' is executedbetween King County a Charter County
and political subdivision of the State of Washington, and the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation of
the State of Washington, hereinafterreferred to as 'County' and 'City' respectively Collectively the
County and City will be referred to as `Party' or `Parties.
PREAMBLE
King County and the City of Auburn adopted the 2001 King County Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan, which includes waste reduction and recycling goals. In order to help meet these
goals, the King County Solid Waste Division has established a waste reduction and recycling grant
program for the cities that operate under the King County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan. This programprovides funding to further the development and/or enhancement of local waste
reduction and recycling projects and for broader resource conservation projects thatintegrate with waste
reduction and recycling programs and services. This grant program does not fund household hazardous
waste collection activities. Program eligibility and grant administration terms are discussed in the Grant
Guidelines, attachedto this Agreement as Exhibit B. Grant funding for this program is subject tothe
yearly budget approval process of the King County Council.
Grant funding approvedby the King County Council is available to all King County cities that operate
under the King County ComprehensiveSolid Waste Management Plan. The City will spend its grant
funds to fulfill the terms and conditions set forth in thescope of work which is attachedhereto as Exhibit
A and incorporated herein by reference. The County expects that any information and/or experience
gained through the grant program by the City will be shared with the County and other King County
cities.
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this Agreement is to define the terms and conditions for funding to be provided to the
City of Auburn by the Countyfor waste reduction and recycling programs and/or services as outlined in
the scope of work and budget attached as Exhibit A.
RES.C
II. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES
The responsibilities of the Parties to this Agreement shall be as follows:
A. The City
l Funds provided to the City by the County pursuantto this Agreement shall be used to provide
waste reduction and recycling programs and/or services as outlined in ExhibitA. The total
amount of funds available from this grant in 2012 shall not exceed $36,386. The City
understandsthat even though this Agreement is two years in duration, funding for this program is
subject to the yearly budget approval process of the King County Council.
2. This Agreementprovides for distribution of 2012 and 2013 grant funds to the City However,
2013 funds are not available until January 1 2013, and 2013 funding is contingent upon King
County Council approval of the 2013 King County budget. The County shall notify the City in
writing of the funding status.
3 During the two-yeargrant program, the City will submit a minimum of two, but no more than
eight, progress reports to the County in a form approved by the County Reports must be signed
by a Cityofficial. These reports will include:
a. a description of each activity accomplished pertaining to thescope of work; and
b. reimbursement requests with either copies of invoices for each expenditure for which
reimbursement is requested or a financial statement, prepared by the City's finance
department, that includes vendor name, description of service, date of service,date paid
and check number
If the City choosesto submit up to the maximum of eight(8) progress reports and requests for
reimbursement during the two year grantprogram,they shall be due to the County onthe last day
of the month following the end of each quarter April 30,July 30, October 31, January 31
except for the final progress report and request for reimbursement which shall be due by March
31 2014
If the City chooses tosubmit the minimum of two progress reports and requests for
reimbursement during the two-year grant program,they shall be due to the County on January 31
2013 and March 31 2014
Regardless of the number of progress reports the City chooses to submit, in order to secure
reimbursement,the City must provide in writing to the County by the 511i working day of January
2013 and January 2014, the dollar amount of outstandingexpenditures for which the City has not
yet submitted a reimbursement request.
4 The City shall submit a final report to the County which summarizes the work completedunder
the grant program and evaluates the effectiveness of the projects for which grant funds were
utilized, according to the evaluation methods specified in the scope of work. The final report is
due within six months of completion of the project(s)outlined in the scope of work, but no later
than June 30, 2014
2
RES.C
5. If the City accepts funding throughthis grant program for the provision of Waste Reduction and
Recycling programs and projects for other incorporated areas of King County the City shall
explain the relationship with the affected adjacent city or cities that allows for acceptance of this
funding and the specifics of the proposed programs and projects within the scope of work
document related thereto.
6. The City shall be responsible for following all applicable Federal, State and locallaws,
ordinances, rules and regulations in the performance of work described herein. The City assures
that its procedures are consistent with laws relating to public contract bidding procedures, and the
County neitherincursnor assumes any responsibilityfor the City's bid, award or contracting
process.
7 During the performance of this Agreement, neither the City nor any Party subcontracting under
the authority of thisAgreement shall discriminate on thebasis of race, color, sex, religion,
nationality creed, marital status, sexual orientation, age, or presence of any sensory mental, or
physical handicapin the employment or application for employment or in the administration or
delivery of or access to services or any other benefits under this Agreement as defined by King
County Code, Chapter 12.16.
8. During the performance of this Agreement, neither the City nor anyParty subcontracting under
the authority of this Agreement shall engage in unfair employment practices as defined by King
County Code, Chapter 12.18. The City shall comply fully with all applicable federal, state and
local laws, ordinances, executive orders and regulations that prohibit such discrimination. These
laws include, but are not limited to, RCWChapter 49.60 and Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964
9 The City shall use recycled paper for the production of all printed and photocopied documents
related to the fulfillment of this Agreement. The City shall use both sides of paper sheets for
copying and printing and shall use recycled/recyclable products whereverpractical.
10. The City shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, financial, and programmatic
records, and other such records as may be deemednecessary by the County to ensure proper
accounting for all project funds and compliance with thisAgreement. All such records shall
sufficiently and properlyreflectall direct and indirect costs of any nature expended and service
provided in the performance of this Agreement.
These records shall be maintained for a period of six (6) years after terminationhereof unless
permission to destroy them isgranted by the Office of the State Archivist in accordance with
RCW Chapter 40.14 These accounts shall be subject to inspection, review or audit by the County
and/or by federal or state officials as so authorized by law
11 The City shall maintain a record of the use of any equipment that costs more than $1,000 and is
purchased with grantfunds from King County for a total period of three(3) years. The records
shall be compiled into a yearlyevaluation report, a copy of which shall be submitted to King
Countyby March 31 of each year through the year 2016.
3
RES.C
12. The City agrees to credit King County on allprintedmaterials providedby the County which the
City is duplicating, for distribution. Either King County's nameand logo must appearon King
County materials (including fact sheets, case studies, etc.), or, ata minimum, the City will credit
King County forartwork or textprovided by the County as follows: `artwork provided courtesy
of King CountySolid Waste Division' and/or"textprovided courtesy of King CountySolid
Waste Division.
13 The City agrees to submit to the County copies of all written materials which it produces and/or
duplicates for local waste reduction and recycling projects which have been funded through the
waste reduction and recycling grant program. Upon request, the City agrees to provide the
County with a reproducible copy of any such written materials and authorizes the County to
duplicate and distribute any written materials so produced, provided that the County credits the
City for the piece.
14 The City will provide the King County Project Manager with the date and location of each
Recycling Collection Event providedby the City as well as copies of any printed materials used
to publicize each event, as soon as they are availablebut no later than thirty(30) days prior to the
event. If there is any change in the date or the location of an event, the City will notify the
County a minimum of thirty(30) days prior to the event. If the eventbrochure is required for
admission to the City's event, the City is exempt from having to provide the brochure to King
County
15 If the City accepts funding through this grant program for the provision of recycling collection
events for adjacent areas of unincorporated King County the City shall send announcements of
the events to all residences listed in the carrier routes provided by King County The
announcements and all other printed materials related to these eventsshall acknowledge King
County as the funding source.
16.The City understands that funding for recyclingcollection events for adjacent areas of
unincorporated King County will be allocated on a yearly basis subjectto the King County
Council's yearly budget approval process and that provision of funds for these events is not
guaranteed for the second year of the grantprogram.
17 This project shall be administered by Joan Nelson, Solid Waste &Recycling Coordinator City of
Auburn; 25 West Main Street; Auburn, WA 98001Phone: (253) 931 5103 Email:
ienelson 2 aubumwa.gov, or designee.
B. The County
1 The County shall administer funding for the waste reduction and recycling grant program.
Funding is designated by city and is subjectto the King CountyCouncil's yearly budgetapproval
process. Provided that the funds are allocated through the King CountyCouncil s yearly budget
approval process, grant funding tothe City will include a base allocation of$5,000peryear with
the balance of funds to be allocatedaccording to the City's percentage of King County's
residential and employment population. However if this population based allocation formula
calculationwould result in a city receiving less than $10,000peryear, that city shall receive an
additional allocation that would raise their total grant fundingto$10,000 per year
4
RES.C
2. The City of Auburn's budgeted grant funds for 2012 are $36,386. Unspent 2012 funds may be
carried over to 2013, but 2013 funds will not carryover to 2014
3 The City of Auburn's estimatedgrantfunds for 2013 are $36,386. 2013 funds are not available
until January 1 2013, and 2013 funding is contingent upon King County Council approval of the
2013 King County budget. Following approval of the 2013 King County budget, the County's
grant program administrator will notify the City of the final 2013 grant funding in writing.
4. Withinforty-five (45) days of receiving a request for reimbursementfrom the City the County
shall either notify the City of any exceptions to the request which have been identified or shall
process the request for payment. If any exceptions to the request are made, this shall be done by
written notification to the City providing the reason for such exception. The County will not
authorize payment for activities and/or expenditures which are not included in the scope of work
and budget attached as ExhibitA, unless the scope has been amended according to Section V of
this Agreement. King County retains the right to withhold all or partial payment if the City's
report(s) and reimbursement request(s) are incomplete (i.e. do not include proper documentation
of expenditures and/or adequate description of each activity described in the scope of workfor
which reimbursement is being requested), and/or are not consistent with the scope of work and
budget attached as ExhibitA.
5 The County agrees to credit the City on all printed materials providedby the City to the County
which the County duplicates, for distribution. Either the City's name and logo will appear on
such materials(including fact sheets, case studies, etc.), or at a minimum,the County will credit
the City for artwork or textprovidedby the City as follows: `artwork provided courtesy of the
City of Auburn' and/or `text provided courtesy of the City of Auburn.
6. The County retains the right to share the written material(s) produced by the City which have
been funded through this program with other King Countycities for them to duplicate and
distribute. In so doing, the County will encourage other cities to credit the City on any pieces that
wereproduced by the City
7 The waste reduction and recycling grant program shall be administered by Morgan John, Project
Manager of the King County Solid Waste Division.
III. DURATION OF AGREEMENT
This Agreement shall become effective on either January 1 2012 or the date of execution of the
Agreement by both the County andthe City if executed after January 1 2012 and shall terminate on
June 30, 2014 The City shall not incur anynew charges after December 31 2013 However, if
execution by either Party does not occur until after January 1, 2012, thisAgreement allows for
disbursement of grant funds to the City for County-approved programs initiated between January 1 2012
and the later execution of the Agreementprovided that the City complies with the reporting requirements
of Section 11. A of the Agreement.
5
RES.C
IV TERMINATION
A. This Agreement may be terminated by King County in whole or in part, for convenience without
cause prior to the termination date specified in Section III, upon thirty(30) days advance written
notice.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party in whole or in part, for cause prior to the
termination date specified inSection III, upon thirty(30)days advance written notice. Reasons for
termination for cause may include but not be limited to: nonperformance; misuse of finds; and/or
failure to provide grant relatedreports/invoices/statements as specified in Section 11.A.3. and Section
II.A.4
C. If the Agreement is terminated as provided in this section: (1) the County will be liable only for
payment in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for services rendered prior to the effective
date of termination; and (2) the City shall be released from any obligation to provide further services
pursuant to this Agreement.
D Nothing herein shall limit, waive, or extinguish any right or remedy providedby this Agreementor
law that either Party may have in the eventthat the obligations, terms and conditions set forth in this
Agreement are breached by the other Party
V AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement of both Parties. Amendments to scopes of
work will only be approved if the proposed amendment is consistent with the most recently adopted King
County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. Funds may be moved between tasks in the scope
of work, attached as ExhibitA, only upon written request by the City and written approval by King
County Suchrequests will only be approved if theproposed change(s) is (are) consistent with and/or
achieves the goals stated in the scope and falls within the activities described in the scope.
VI. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
The City shall protect, indemnify and hold harmless the County its officers, agents, and employees from
and against any and all claims, costs, and/or issues whatsoever occurring from actions by the City and/or
its subcontractors pursuant to thisAgreement. The City shall defend at its own expense any and all
claims, demands, suits, penalties, losses, damages, or costs of any kind whatsoever(hereinafter 'claims")
brought against the County arisingout of or incident to the City's execution of, performance of or failure
to perform this Agreement. Claims shall include butnot be limited to assertions that the use ortransfer
of anysoftware, book, document, report, film,tape, or sound reproduction ormaterial of any kind,
delivered hereunder constitutes an infringement of any copyright, patent, trademark, trade name, and/or
otherwise results in unfair trade practice.
6
RES.C
VII. INSURANCE
A. The City at its own cost, shall procure by the date of execution of this Agreement and maintain for
the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to
property which mayarise from or in connection with performance of work pursuantto this
Agreement by the City its agents, representatives, employees, and/or subcontractors. The minimum
limits of this insurance shall be $1,000,000general liability insurance combined single limit per
occurrence for bodily injury personal injury and property damage. If the policy has an aggregate
limit, a $2,000,000 aggregate shallapply Any deductible or self-insured retentions shall be thesole
responsibility of the City Such insurance shallcover the County its officers, officials, employees,
and agents as additional insureds against liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf
of the City pursuant to this Agreement. A valid Certificate of Insurance and additional insured
endorsement is attached tothis Agreement as Exhibit C, unless Section VII.B. applies.
B. If the Agency is a Municipal Corporation or an agency of the State of Washington and is self-insured
for any of the above insurance requirements, a written acknowledgement of self-insurance is attached
to this Agreement as Exhibit C.
VIII. ENTIRECONTRACT/WAIVER OF DEFAULT
This Agreement is the complete expression of the agreement of the County and City hereto, and any oral
or written representations or understandingsnot incorporated herein are excluded. Waiver of any default
shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent default. Waiver of breach of any provision of this
Agreement shall not be deemed to be waiver of anyotheror subsequent breach and shall not be
construed to be a modification of the terms of thisAgreement unless stated to be such through written
approval by the County which shall be attached to the original Agreement.
IX. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE
The County and City recognize that time is of the essence in the performance of thisAgreement.
X. SEVERABILITY
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Agreement is, for any reason, found to be
unconstitutional orotherwise invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions.
7
RES.C
XI. NOTICE
Any notice required or permitted under thisAgreement shall be deemed sufficiently given or served if
sent to the King CountySolid Waste Division and the City at theaddresses providedbelow-
Morgan John, Project Manager, or a provided designee,
King County Solid Waste Division
Department of Natural Resources and Parks
201 South Jackson Street, Suite 701
Seattle, WA 98104-3855
If to the City
Joan Nelson, Solid Waste & RecyclingCoordinator
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001
IN WITNESSWHEREOF this Agreement has been executed by each Party on the date set forth below.
King County
BY
Title) Kevin Kiernan, Director
Solid Waste Division
For Dow Constantine, King County Executive
Date Date
V
8
RES.C
Exhibit A
CITY OF AUBURN
SCOPE OF WORK
20122013 SOLID WASTE DIVISION
WASTE REDUCTION/RECYCLING GRANT
A. BASIC INFORMATION
1. Applicant: City of Auburn
2. Project Title: City of AuburnRecycling Program
3. Grant Manager Joan Nelson,Solid Waste&Recycling Coordinator
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn,WA 98001
Phone:(253)931 5103
Fax:(253)876-1900
Email:jenelsonn aubumiva.eov
4. Project Manager Kathleen Edman,Solid Waste Customer Care Specialist
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn,WA 98001
Phone:(253)931 3047
Fax:(253)876-1900
Email: kedman%a auburmva.eoy
5.Requested dollar amount: 2012-2013 Grant Award 112,772.00
4 King County Special Recycling Events $ 40,000.00
2012-2013 Total 72,772.00
B. PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK
Projects:
Task#1 Residential Recycling
Task#2 Environmental Education in Auburn Schools
Task#3 Public Place Recycling
Task#4 Multifamily Recycling
Task#5 Business Recycling
Task#6 City of Auburn"Going Green Program'
Project Managers: Auburn's Solid Waste Customer Care Specialist will implement andmanage the projects.
TheSolid Waste&Recycling Coordinator will manage the administration tasks of the Grant(budget,reporting,and
reimbursements). Both positions are fully funded by the City of Auburn Solid Waste Division.
Schedule: January 1 2012 December 31 2013
Goals: To increase theawareness of and participation in Auburn's waste reduction and recycling programs,and to increase
waste diversion in the Residential,Multifamily and Business waste streams.
1
RES.C
Exhibit A
Background:
Business Community
The City of Auburn provides outreach and education through a Business Recycling All-Stars Program that was created to
assist businesses with their waste prevention and recycling programs(a Commingled Recycling Program and a
CompostablesProgram). The City offers a Business Recycling Tool Kit and office recycle boxes tobusinesses who sign up
for the City Business Recycling All-Stars Program. Outreach avenues includewebsite announcements,newsletters,
chamber of commerceluncheon and flyer inserts,business gatherings,and other media outreach.
Beginning in October 2010,Waste Management tookprimary responsibility for Business Recycling Outreach(site visits,
waste audits,trainings,presentations and material distribution).The City has assisted WasteManagement in the creation of
an outreach brochure and by mailing outreach information packets to businesses or property owners who ask for assistance.
Residential Community
The City of Auburn provides recycling,waste prevention,and food scrap recycling outreach and education to single-family
duplex,multifamily and mobile homeresidents through media avenues such as: newsletters,advertising,website
announcements,phone messages, flyers,and recycling events. The City also provides an `at home' city-wide garage sale
opportunity for single-family and mobile home park residents to promote reuse. The City recognizes the importance of
educating a diverse community about different methods of waste reduction and recycling andhas published newsletters and
articles,given classroomwaste reduction and recycling presentations,answered citizen questions,and given resources to
residents who ask for assistance.
Beginning in October 2010, Waste Management took primary responsibility for Multifamily Recycling Outreach(site
visits,waste audits,trainings,presentations and material distribution).The City has assisted Waste Management in the
creation of three outreach brochures(resident,multifamily property owner and multifamily tenant)and by providing
property owner information packets,recycle tote bags and recycle guidelines to property ownersupon request.
Task#1. ResidentialRecycling
A. Program/ProjectDescription
Residential Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City of Auburn will produce and mail a newsletter toall
single-family residents. Thenewsletter will include information on waste prevention,reuse,and recycling. The
City will use different forms of media,presentations,and promotional items to promote waste reduction and
recycling programs. The City will offer an environmental `Movie Night' and subsidized compost bins to
residents.
City Residential Garage Sale—The City will promote waste reduction andreuse by sponsoring a three-day city-
wide garagesale forall single-family residents.
B. Deliverables
Residential Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City will produce or have professionally producedmedia
pieces,displays,and promotional items,which may include,but are not limited to:posters,stickers,environmental
tool kits,decals,and subsidized compost bins. These materials will be used to promote waste reduction and
recycling andthe Movie Night.
City Residential Garage Sale—The `Garage Sale Kits' given to each participant and advertisements will bethe
deliverables.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
Residential Recycling Outreach&Assistance Newsletters and advertisements will promote upcoming City and
County events,inform residents about resources available for waste reduction and recycling specificto their home,
and provide other pertinent information. The City will increase awareness of and participation in the City's Waste
Reduction and Recycling Program.
City Residential Garage Sale—The city-wide garage sale will encourageresidents to reduce waste andreuse.
D. Evaluation
Residential Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City will record the number of newsletters and articles created
and distributed to City of Auburn residents(Single Family/Duplex and Mobile Home Park). The City will record
2
RES.C
Exhibit A
the number of displays and promotional items created,displayed or distributed. The City will also track the
number of calls,emails,or faxes we receive regarding these items. The City will count the number of compost
binssold and record success through a survey(via mail or phone). The City will also count the number of
residents who attend the Movie Night.
City Residential Garage Sale—The City will record the number of"Garage Sale Kits' distributed. A survey will
also be conducted(self-addressed postcard mailed back to the City or online survey),determining the number of
itemssold or given away
Task#2: Environmental Education in Auburn Schools
A. Program/Project Description
School Programs&Presentations City staff and a consultant will continue to provide waste reduction,recycling
and food scrap recycling materials and presentations to elementary school classrooms and other schools upon
request. The City will offer the Powerful Choices Land&Air Day presentations to 8's Gradeclassrooms. A
consultant will work with the Auburn School District Resource Conservation Manager(RCM)on waste reduction
and recycling programs for the schools.
B. Deliverables
School Programs&Presentations—The number of classroom presentations will be a deliverable.The amount of
materials recycled atthe Auburn Schools will also be a deliverable. Pre and post-classroompresentationsurveys
will be completed.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
School Programs&Presentations—City staff andthe consultant will promote valuable lessons about waste
reduction and recycling to students and teachers. These lessons will then be shared with parents and may
influence purchasing and disposal decisions.
D. Evaluation
School Programs&Presentations The City will record the number of classroom presentations given to Auburn
students. The pre and post-classroom presentation surveys will determine the effectiveness of the information
presented. The amount of materialsrecycled at each school will be tracked by the RCM.
Task#3: Public Place Recycling
A. Program Description
Containers&Supplies-Recycling containers will be placed at City Parks and the public downtown area to
promote recycling. Quantity of containers per location will vary according to activities and seasonal citizen
attendance.
B. Deliverables
Containers&Supplies The containers,container labels,and hardware will be the deliverables.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
Containers&Supplies By placing recycling containers in public areas,the City expects to increase awareness of
and participation in the City's Waste Reduction and Recycling Program.
D. Evaluation
Containers&Supplies The City will record the number of containers and supplies at each location.
The City will track the amount of garbage and recycling collected,and will measurewaste diversion.
Task#4: Multifamily Recycling
A. Program/Project Description
Multifamily Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City of Auburn will assist the contracted solid waste hauler,
Waste Management,in outreachby providing waste reduction and recyclinginformation and materials for
property owners who start recycling programs orrequest information for new tenants.
3
RES.C
Exhibit A
B. Deliverables
Multifamily Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City will provide materials which may include,but are not
limited to:recycle guidelines,activity books for kids,and multifamily tote bags. The recycleguidelines will be
printed in multiple languages so that multi-cultural tenants can be reached.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
Multifamily Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City aimsto inform multifamily tenants about resources
available for waste reduction and recycling specific to their homes. The City will increase awareness and
participation in the City's Multifamily Recycling Program,resulting in increasedwaste diversion and less
contamination.
D. Evaluation
Multifamily Recycling Outreach&AssistanceThe City will record the number of informational packets,
guidelines,and multifamily tote bags that are distributed andthe number of properties thatstart a recycling
program. The City may requestWaste Management staff to conduct pre-and post-inspections at multifamily
properties thatrequest recycle`tune-ups' to determine if the information presented to tenantswas effective.
Task#5: Business Recycling
A. Program Description
Business Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City of Auburn will assist the contracted solid waste hauler,
Waste Management,in outreachby providing waste reduction and recyclinginformation and materials for
businesses that start a recycling program or request information. The City will recognize businesses that
participate in the Business Recycling All-Stars Program with an advertisement in the local newspaper and/or a
certificate.
Chamber of CommerceThe City of Auburn will be a businesssponsor for the Auburn Chamber of Commerce.
Through sponsorship the City of Auburn Solid Waste Division will hostone of the monthly ChamberLuncheons.
B. Deliverables
Business Recycling Outreach&Assistance A business database indicating who is recycling and who is not
recycling will be a deliverable. Businesswastestreamdata from the hauler will be tracked and recorded.
Promotional materials,phone assistance,and Solid Waste Division contact may also be a deliverable.
Chamber of Commerce—Hosting of the Chamber Luncheon and providing center pieces(which will be given
away in a raffle)and education materials will be the deliverables.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
Business Recycling Outreach &Assistance By promoting the Business Recycling All-Stars Program,the City
expects to increase participation in the City of Auburn's Business Recycling Program,reduce waste in the waste
stream,and increase waste diversion. Business recognition is intended to educate Auburn businesses aboutthe
benefits of waste reduction and recycling,and give examples of businesses that are making a difference.
Chamber of Commerce Staying involved with businesses through the Chamber of Commerce will increase our
contact with businesses and keep us aware of newtrends in the Auburn business communityThis will let us
better serve Auburn businesses and tailor waste reduction and recycling programs to their needs.
D. Evaluation
Business Recycling Outreach&Assistance The City will track the number businesses that start a recycling
program or call for assistance,and will record the tonnage of waste diverted(throughhauler reports). Evaluation
of this activity will be conducted by counting the number of information packets are mailed and/or distributed to
businesses in Auburn.
Chamber of CommerceThe number of businesses that call will also be monitored and recorded to find out where
businessessaw or heard about the City's Business Recycling All-Stars Program.
Task#6: City of Auburn "Going Green Program",
A. ProgramDescription
City Employee Outreach&Education—The City Going Green Team will continue to encourage employeesin
each department to reduce waste and recycle. Employees who practice waste reduction and recycling will be
recognized with an incentive such as a reusable bag orcoffee mug. The Green Team will encourage employee
4
RES.C
Exhibit A
meetings and events tobe"waste-free' by creating City Event Tool Kits. Emails,posters,or similar artwork may
be created to announceor promote waste reduction and recycling.
B. Deliverables
City Employee Outreach&Education—City Event Tool Kits will be a deliverable and may include containers,
compostable bags,compostable or reusabledishes and utensils,signage,and other necessary materials.
C. Expected Outcomes/Impacts
City Employee Outreach&Education By the City recognizing employees for their waste reduction and recycling
efforts,the Green Teamexpects to increase employee participation in the CityGoing Green Program,reduce
waste in the waste stream,and increase waste diversion. The educationaloutreach through the Intranet,emails,
posters,and waste-free employee events is intended to educate employeesabout the benefits of waste reduction
and recycling,and give examples of how they are making a difference.
D. Evaluation
City Employee Outreach&Education The City Green Team will record the environmental actions of each City
department andthe tonnage of waste diverted by City Facilities. Evaluation of this activity will be conducted by
counting the number of Intranetarticles,emails,and other promotional items that are distributed to employees and
by counting the number of calls for assistance and information that are received as a result receiving said items.
5
RES.C
Exhibit A
C. PROPOSED BUDGET
Grant Funds Available for 2012-2013: 112,772.00
LESS King County Special Events-2 per year 40,000.00
Adjusted Grant Funds Available: 72,772.00
Projected Projected
2012 Total 2013 Total
Task#1 Residential Recycling
Residential Recycling Outreach &Assistance 3,862.50 2,503.00
Residential Community Yard Sale 2,867.50 2,867.50
Total Task#1 6,730.00 5,370.50
Task#2 Environmental Education in Auburn Schools
Schools Program Outreach &Assistance 2,937.50 8,997.50
Total Task#2 2,937.50 8,997.50
Task#3 Public Place Recycling
Recycling Containers & Supplies 14,756.00 3,605.50
Total Task#3 14,756.00 3,605.50
Task#4 Multifamily Recycling
Multifamily Recycling Outreach & Education 8,575.00 13,525.00
Total Task#4 8,575.00 13,525.00
Task#5 Business Recycling
Business Recycling Outreach & Education 375.00 1,875.00
Total Task#5 375.00 1,875.00
Task#6 City of Auburn Going Green Program
Recycling Outreach & Education 3,012.50 3,012.50
Total Task#6 3,012.50 3,012.50
TOTAL GRANT FUNDING (By Year) _ $36,386.00 36,386.00
GRAND TOTAL GRANT FUNDING 72,77200
6
RES.C
Exhibit B
Grant Guidelines
Program Eligibility
Grant funds may be used for any of the programs previously funded by the City Optional and
Waste Reduction Recycling Programs, including residential and commercial waste reduction and
recycling educationprograms, business assistance programs,and special recycling events.Cities
may also use their funds on broader resource conservation programs,as long as they are part of an
overall waste reduction/recycling program. Cities may choose to use their funding on one
program or a combination of programs. For WR/R program ideas,please refer to the Program
Eligibility section below
Please note these lists are not exhaustive,but merelyintended to provide some guidance on
what is/isn't eligible. Cities may also refer to the currently adopted Comprehensive Solid
Waste Management Plan for direction in program development. If you are unsure if your
proposed program is eligible for funding, please call Morgan John(206-296-8443).
Eligible for funding:
School WR/R education/implementation programs
Kitchen food waste composting programs
Reusable bag promotions
Yard waste subscription promotions
Outreach at community events
Promoting new and existing WR/R programs through media,mail,and social networking
Business recognition programs
Recycling Collection Events, including collection of tires and mattresses
Business,WR/R,residential education/communications
Product stewardship initiatives could be education programs orworking with other
agencies/organizations/businessesto implement programs
City recycling programs and facilities
Videos promoting WR/R programs
The following are eligible for funding on a case-by-case basis,as long as part of an overall
WR/R Program. However the County would not provide reimbursement if,for example,
all of a city's grant dollars were used to sell/give away rain barrels or distribute compact
fluorescent light bulbs.
Water Conservation i.e. Rain Barrels
Energy Conservation
Water Quality integrated pest management;catch basin filters
Demonstration gardens; interpretive signage; recycled-contentpark furnishings
2012-2013 WR/R Grant
RES.C
The following are not eligible for funding:
Collection of garbage, except for residual garbage related to the collection of recyclables.
Collection of any household hazardous waste items including, butnot limited to:
Treated wood
Paint
Lead acid batteries
Oil, gasoline,and antifreeze
Florescent lights
Household Hazardous Waste Education Programs
Cities should pursue fundingthrough LHWMP or CPG for Household HazardousWaste
collection or education programs.
Grant Administration:
Requests for Reimbursement:
Cities may submit as few as two requests for reimbursement during the funding cycle, with the
first requestdue by January 31 2013 and the final requestdue no later than March 15, 2014.
However, cities may submit requests for reimbursement as frequently as quarterly Quarterly
requests should be submitted on April 30,July 3I,Oct. 31 and Jan 31 of each year,except for the
final request for reimbursement,which is due no later than March 15, 2014 The Budget
SummaryReportForm(Attachment 4) must be used when submitting requests for
reimbursement.
By December 31"of each year of the grant cycle,cities must notify SWD of their total
expenditures for work that hasbeen completed to-date,but for which requests for
reimbursement have not yet been submitted.
Progress and Final Reports.
Progress reports describing program activities,accomplishments and evaluation results need to
accompany each request for reimbursement. A final report describing the outcome of grant-
funded activities is due with the final request for reimbursement. If, however,the city does not
have the results of its program evaluation by the end of the grant cycle, the final narrativereport
may be submitted no laterthan six monthsafter the end of the grant cycle on June 30, 2014.
Note: The final request for reimbursement would still needto be submitted by March 15, 2014.)
All Progress and Final Reports need to be signed by a cityofficial. Signed reports may be
submitted via facsimile.
Amendments.
Formal amendments to grant ILAs are not necessaryunless the city wishesto make significant
changes to its scope of work and/or budget. In general,a significant change would be one in
which the city wishes to add or delete a task from their scope of work. A minor change,such as
moving dollars between tasks, would only require writtennotification, which may be submitted
via e-mail. However the city shouldcontact the Division when considering changesto their
scopes and budgets to determine if a formal amendment is needed.
RES.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4782
Date:
December 12, 2011
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4782
Exhibit A
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4782.
Background Summary:
The City Council provided for the adoption of a City of Auburn Fee Schedule in the
adoption of Ordinance No. 5707.
Construction permits are issued to control work done by third parties in the public right-of-
way, primarily for franchise utility improvements (such as power, gas, and
telecommunication). Special permits are issued to control work associated with driveways
and sidewalks constructed by private parties in the public right-of-way. The current fees for
these permits have not been updated since 2009 and due to additional requirements
related to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) that impact driveways and sidewalks,
the staff time required to process and inspect these permits has increased.
Therefore, staff is recommending to amend the fees and charges for City construction and
special permits.
F4.3
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:December 19, 2011 Item Number:RES.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.D
RESOLUTION NO. 4 78 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURNWASHINGTON, AMENDING THE CITY OF
AUBURN FEE SCHEDULE RELATING TO FEES
CHARGED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
WHEREAS, in connection with the municipal functions and operations of the City
of Auburn, the City provides various public services, a number of which entail fees; and
WHEREASthe City Council provided for adoption of a City ofAuburn Fee
Schedules in the adoption of Ordinance No 5707 and
WHEREAS, in thenormal course of reviewing public worksfees and costs, it is
appropriate to revise and amend amounts charged for Construction and Special Permit
Fees.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES as follows.
Section 1. The City of Auburn Fee Schedule related toPublic Works
Construction and Special Permit Fees is herebyamended and updated as setforth in
the attached Exhibit A, incorporated herein by this reference
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry outthe directives of thislegislation.
Section 3. ThisResolution shall be in full force and affect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Resolution No. 4782
December 9, 2011
Page 1 of 2
RES.D
DATED and SIGNED this day of 2011
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVEDAS TO FORM:
f4 e4
4 ,
t ie B.'` City Attor
Resolution No. 4782
December 9, 2011
Page 2 of 2
RES.D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 23
10. Construction Permits: (Per Ordinance No. 5817, Resolution No. 3953, Resolution No.
4272, and Resolution No. 4424 and Resolution No. 4782.)
The fees for Construction Permits are as follows:
Basic Fee (BF) $150.00225.00
Hourly Inspection Rate (HIR)
Normal Business Hours $52.0062.00
After Hours (after hours work includes weeknights, weekends,
and holidays and will be at the after hours HIR x the duration of
the work.
$80.0093.00
For Excavation Type Work:
Length of Excavation (feet) Additional Fee (AF)
31 – 100 $52.0062.00
101 – 250 $155.00186.00
251 – 500 $259.00310.00
501 – 750 $362.00434.00
751 – 1000 $466.00558.00
Permit Fee = BF + AF (for the appropriate length of excavation)
If the excavation exceeds 1000 linear feet the following will be used:
Permit Fee = BF + $466558.00.00 + (HIR x (Length of Excavation – 1000)/100)
For Non-Excavation Type Work: This work includes any work in the public right-of-way that is
not covered by any other permits and includes such things as overhead utility work,
geotechnical borings, horizontal directional drilling and vault installation.
Permit Fee = BF + (HIR x Permit Duration in days)
In Lieu of Fee: In lieu of the above standard rates, the city engineer or his/her designee may
calculate the fee based upon current labor rates for administrative and inspection staff after
developing an estimate of staff effort involved. For projects that are expected to involve
significantly more than 1,000 feet of street excavation or when the scope or duration cannot be
accurately estimated, the city engineer may establish a deposit account to manage permitee
deposits in advance of permit issuance for reimbursing actual labor costs of administering the
permit. Such deposit accounts will not be interest bearing and will be closed at the end of the
permitted work when a final accounting of the permit administration cost shall be calculated and
a final bill or credit issued to the permitee.
11. Memorial Sign Program: (Per Ordinance No. 6137, and Ordinance No. 6149)
Memorial Sign $150.00
RES.D
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 24
12. Special Permits: (Per Ordinance No. 5817 and amended by Resolution No. 3953,
Resolution No. 4272, and Resolution No. 4424, and Resolution No. 4782.)
Permit Type Base Fee Additional Per Linear Foot Fee
Sidewalk $54.0062.00 $1.10 per foot for each foot over 25 Linear Feet
Residential Driveway $54.00124.00 $1.65 per foot for each foot over 20 Linear Feet*
Commercial Driveway $107.00175.00 $2.20 per foot for each foot over 48 Linear Feet*
*Driveway widths are based on the width of the driveway apron in the right-of-way.
13. Street Payback Agreements: (Per Ordinance No. 6319 and Resolution No. 4624.)
Application Fee $500.00
Processing Fee $1,000.00
Assessment Reimbursement Area Analysis $1,000.00
Transaction/Collection Fee $300.00
Outside Professional Services (when needed) Time and Materials
RES.D