HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-16-2012 Public Works Agenda Packet
Public Works Committee
April 16, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes*
B. Public Works Project No. CP1121* (Wickstrom)
Approve Change Order No. 2 in the Amount of $75,000 to Contract No. 11-25 for
Work on Project No. CP1121, 2011 Local Street Pavement Preservation - Phase 2
C. Public Works Project No. CP1211* (Truong)
Permission to Initiate Project No. CP1211, Downtown Sculpture Garden
III.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Horsley Leak Adjustment Appeal* (Coleman)
B. February 2012 Financial Report* (Coleman)
C. Ordinance No. 6407* (S. Wagner)
An Ordinance of the City Council, of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending
Chapter 18.40 - Public Use District of the Auburn City Code By Amending Section
18.04.020, Definitions, and Adding a New Section 18.04.105, All Relating to Public
Animal Shelters
D. Resolution No. 4808* (Bailey)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Declaring
Certain Items of Property as Surplus and Authorizing their Disposal
E. West Main Street Sidewalk Repair Estimate (Wickstrom)
F. Mill Creek Basin Flow Control Exemption* (Carlaw)
G. Grant Status Update (Hankins)
H. Capital Project Status Report* (Gaub)
I. Activities Matrix* (Dowdy)
IV.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for
review at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
April 2, 2012 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the April 2, 2012 Public Works
Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A
Public Works Committee
April 2, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in Conference
Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One East Main Street,
Auburn, Washington, 98002.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wagner, Vice-Chair Bill Peloza, and Member Osborne were
present. Also present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete Lewis, Council
Member Largo Wales, City Engineer/Assistant Director Dennis Selle,
Assistant City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Utilities Engineer Dan Repp,
Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Finance Director Shelley Coleman,
Financial Planning Manager Martin Chaw, Planner Stuart Wagner, Planning
Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Public Works Secretary Jennifer Rigsby,
Lisa Harmon from Girl Dogs Inc., and citizen Scot Pondelick.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no agenda modifications.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve the Public Works Committee Meeting
minutes for March 19, 2012, as amended.
Vice-Chair Peloza requested that the minutes be amended, on page 5 of
10, to include the statement, “Mayor Lewis requested additional information
from Vice-Chair Peloza relating to V.A. replacement of ramps for
veterans.”
Chairman Wagner pointed out that “Veterans’ Association” should be
corrected to read “Veterans’ Administration.”
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
Page 1 of 8
CA.A
B. Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-10 (Mund)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-10 for the
Parks, Arts and Recreation Department Clean Sweep 2012.
Engineering Aide Mund explained that the Parks, Arts and Recreation
Department have applied for their annual Right-of-Way Use Permit for
Operation Clean Sweep to close Main Street from A Street NW/SW to
Auburn Way.
Engineering Aide Mund stated that the intersection at E Main Street and A
Street SE/Auburn Avenue will be closed until the conclusion of the sweep,
as it has been in years past, in response to a question asked by Chairman
Wagner.
Member Osborne asked if the promenade and plaza area can be used for
the event instead of closing N Division Street from W Main Street to 1st
Street NE. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle said that in the future the
promenade will be able to be utilized more but because construction is not
completed, it will not be used this year.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
C. Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-11 (Mund)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-11 for Girl
Dog Inc. Hotdog Stand.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if the owner was going to be operating year-
round. Mayor Lewis answered that was the goal that the owner is working
toward. Engineering Aide Mund introduced Lisa Harman, owner of Girl
Dogs Inc. Ms. Harmon confirmed that she is working toward being open
year-round.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if last year was fruitful for the business. Ms.
Harmon answered that the year was successful and Engineering Aide Mund
distributed a report about the business, prepared by Ms. Harmon, to the
Committee.
Ms. Harmon stated that she did participate in the Auburn International
Farmers Market last year and will participate in each market day this year,
in response to questions asked by the Committee.
Ms. Harmon responded to questions asked by Member Osborne regarding
her original permit application.
Page 2 of 8
CA.A
Chairman Wagner asked if the business was at the City’s 4th of July
event. Ms. Harmon answered that she was not at the event.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Ordinance No. 6406 Proposed Amendments to Section 18.56.025 - Real
Estate Signs (S. Wagner)
Planner Wagner provided a background summary for Ordinance No. 6406
which proposes amendments to Section 18.56.025 of the Auburn City Code
which pertains to real estate signs.
Planner Wagner stated that the Planning Department staff held workshops
with the Planning Commission and on March 6, 2012, there was Public
Hearing. It was staffs’ recommendation to continue the interim sign controls
that Council approved in 2011 via Ordinance 6360 and the Planning
Commission concurred. The interim sign controls will be effective through
April 21, 2013, upon introduction and approval of Ordinance No. 6406.
Mayor Lewis spoke about the real estate signs that have been posted in the
Lakeland Hills area over the years, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner regarding whether or not the Planning Commission
discussed how to possibly control the content of real estate signs to ensure
the signs’ legitimacy.
Mayor Lewis stated that since the primary development areas that would be
affected by the continuation of the sign controls are the very north and
south ends of the City, he did not see a problem with the extension given
the history of sign placement in developing areas.
The Committee and staff discussed the difference between informational
real estate signs and other types of signs. Planning Manager Chamberlain
stated that the Planning and Community Development Committee agreed to
extend the sign controls without making changes to avoid having to regulate
the existing signs that were allowed by the original code change.
Chairman Wagner and Mayor Lewis discussed the functionality of the signs.
Planner Wagner responded to questions asked by Vice-Chair Peloza
regarding sign code compliance.
Vice-Chair Peloza spoke about the economic benefit of allowing the
extension of the sign controls and spoke in favor of extending them for an
additional year.
Chairman Wagner spoke about methods of responding to mass
Page 3 of 8
CA.A
communications regarding particular signs, such as the Lakeland Hills
residents’ concerns about the real estate signs, and preparing responses.
Member Osborne asked what party is advocating for the extension of the
sign controls. Mayor Lewis answered that primary advocates are the large
developers.
Planner Wagner stated that the signs do steer traffic to the developments,
in response to questions asked by Member Osborne.
Planner Wagner outlined the sign permit application process in response to
a question asked by Member Osborne.
Chairman Wagner commented on flashing changing message signs that
may be violating City Code and asked if the Planning and Community
Development Committee (PCDC) is planning to review the section of the
code addressing message signs. Planner Wagers answered that PCDC
does not currently have plans to review the code. Staff will examine some
existing signs that may be in violation of the current code.
B. Utility Rate Study Update Alternative Scenario (Coleman)
Finance Director Coleman presented the Committee with an alternative to
the increase in utility rates previously brought to the Committee for
review. The alternative scenario includes increasing the water and storm
utility rates more than previously suggested in order to carry the debt
service for the sewer utility in order to reduce the proposed increase to
sewer for 2012.
Finance Director Coleman stated that the alternative scenario proposes a
11.5% rate increase for all utilities in 2012, compared to the original
proposal of an 8% increase for the water utility, 2.5% storm utility increase,
and a 33% sewer utility increase. Also included is a proposed future annual
(2013-2017) 2.5% increase in the water utility, 1.5% increase in the storm
utility, and 5% in the sewer utility. The $1.2M interfund loan from the water
and storm utilities to the sewer utility would have a 3 year repayment plan.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if the 11.5% increase would cover the City’s utility
costs. Finance Director Coleman answered for water and storm the
increase would cover the costs and for sewer the increase may or may not
cover the costs and the sewer utility may need to borrow funds from the
other two utilities.
Finance Director Coleman explained why the recommended increase for
the sewer utility is higher than the other two utilities, in the original proposal,
at the request of Vice-Chair Peloza.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked at what time staff realized that the cost of the
Page 4 of 8
CA.A
sewer utility was disproportionate to the costs of the water and storm
utilities. Finance Director Coleman answered in 2011.
The Committee reviewed the graph demonstrating the Sewer Utility
Revenue Requirements 2012-2017.
The Committee and staff reviewed the Combined Debt Service Coverage
Before and After Rate Adjustments graph. Finance Planning Manager Chaw
answered questions asked by Chairman Wagner regarding the debt service
coverage requirements.
The Committee and staff discussed the need to provide more debt service
coverage than the amount required, which is 1.25.
Chairman Wagner pointed out that in comparison to nearby jurisdictions;
the City’s rates are lower. Mayor Lewis suggested providing the comparison
to utility customers. Chairman Wagner agreed.
Chairman Wagner spoke about the possibility of customers not noticing the
rate increase for all the utilities, but instead focusing on just the water utility
increase.
Member Osborne commented that not all utility customer are the same and
pointed out that there are many customer who are not on sewer and are on
City water. Member Osborne explained that in the alternative scenario the
water utility rates will be increased to cover the sewer utility, a utility which
not all water customers use. Member Osborne stated that this was one of
the reasons he supports the original plan over the alternative one. Member
Osborne spoke about how the alternative scenario will also affect the
different categories of water utility customers.
The Committee and staff discussed the number of water only customers,
15,000, versus those who are sewer customers, 13,000.
Member Osborne spoke in favor of the original plan and against borrowing
funds from the water and storm utilities to cover the sewer utility, especially
since the predications regarding the future strength of the sewer utility are
not certain.
Member Osborne and the Committee compared the original plan increases
to the ones outlined in the alternative scenario.
Finance Director Coleman explained that there are two fundamental
differences between the original plan and the alternative, following a
request from Vice-Chair Peloza.
Vice-Chair Peloza spoke in favor of the original plan that was recommended
Page 5 of 8
CA.A
by staff and presented to the Committee at past meetings.
Finance Director Coleman answered questions asked by Member Osborne
regarding bond issuance and debt service.
The Committee, Mayor Lewis, and Finance Director Coleman discussed
how to include the inter-jurisdictional utility billing comparison with
customers’ utility bills.
After discussing the alternative scenario and comparing it to staff’s original
recommendations the Committee supported moving forward with the
original recommendations for utility rate increases.
Chairman Wagner told Finance Director Coleman that he and Member
Osborne have been preparing their comments on the Cost of Service study
spreadsheet and will be submitting it to her. Chairman Wagner stated that
he would like the Cost of Service study be complete by the end of the year
so adjustment can be made the utility rates, if the study justifies changes.
C. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub)
Item No. 4 – CP1005 – South Division Street Promenade: Vice-Chair
Peloza commented that he is pleased the project is under budget.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the only reason the project is
moving more slowly is because of the weather conditions, in response to a
question asked by Member Osborne. Assistant City Engineer Gaub
explained that in order to put the pavers down, a higher temperature level
and low humidity level is required.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked if the pavers will be completed by the ribbon
cutting ceremony on April 12, 2012. Assistant City Engineer Gaub
answered that they will not; however, the Contractor is attempting to
complete as much as the weather will allow by the ceremony.
Item No. 11 – CP1116 – Downtown Pedestrian Light Replacement: Vice-
Chair Peloza asked if the project is on schedule. Assistant City Engineer
Gaub answered that it is, work is going to begin the week of April 16th.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the project competition date may
be extended into May, and that depends on how many lights can be
completed each day but the work should proceed quickly.
Item No. 12 – C201A – M Street SE Underpass: Member Osborne asked if
there had been a stop work order issued on the project. Assistant City
Engineer Gaub confirmed that there was not a stop work order
issued. Gaub explained that there is work that needs to be done by the
contractor prior to them being able to disturb the ground in order for them to
Page 6 of 8
CA.A
be in compliance with state permits that are required for the project.
Item No. 15 CP0909 – Academy Booster Pump Station: Member Osborne
asked about the change in completion date. Assistant City Engineer Gaub
answered that there are delays due to complications in obtaining an
easement which requires additional design work and this will push out the
bid date and in turn delay the completion date.
Item No. 21 – CP1206 – 2012 Pavement Patching, Chip Seal, and Overlay
Project: Assistant City Engineer Gaub explained that the $200,000 SOS
funds are part of the 2012 budget, in response to a question asked by
Member Osborne. The contract for CP1206 combines the overlays and
patching for the SOS project with the patching work planned on the arterial
roads in order to get a better, more competitive bids.
Item No. 27 – CP1024 – AWS and M Street SE Intersection
Improvements: Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the project has
partial funding and staff is currently working on preliminary design for the
improvements and putting together some cost estimates which is
anticipated to be completed this year, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner. Construction of the improvements is dependant of
funding and will not likely occur this year.
Item No. 30 – C512A – Well 4 Improvements: Gaub responded that the
project is currently on hold and will update the project information
accordingly in response to a question from Member Osborne.
Item No. 33 – CP1121 – 2011 Local Street Pavement Preservation – Phase
2: Vice-Chair Peloza asked when work on H Street will begin. Mayor Lewis
answered that work will begin this construction season. Assistant City
Engineer Gaub stated that the contractor is working at two locations at a
time. Currently work is being done on 3rd Street SW and 2nd Street NE and
when those locations are complete the contractor will move on to the next
two locations.
Item D – CP1006 – Fenster Levee Project: Assistant City Engineer Gaub
stated that the current estimate for the project is $1.2M and there is current
grant funding and other City funding sources that total
$639,100.00. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated there is an additional
$300,000.00 from WIRA 9 but that still needs KCD approval.
Item B – CP1115 – City Hall NW Plaza Improvements: Member Osborne
asked what improvements need to be made to the ADA ramp. Assistant
City Engineer Gaub stated that the current grade of the ramp, without
landings, does not meet current ADA standards. Similar upgrades were
made to the south side of City Hall last year.
Page 7 of 8
CA.A
D. Activities Matrix (Dowdy)
Item E – Potential ROW Purchase on NE corner of 104th & 8th NE
Intersection: Chairman Wagner asked that the item be removed from the
matrix since there is no reason to purchase the property.
Assistant City Engineer Gaub explained why staff determined there is no
need to purchase the ROW near the intersection, following questions asked
by Member Osborne.
Item F – Cascade Water Alliance and/or Tacoma Public Utilities Water
Purchase Agreement: Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle said the
agreement is totally separate from the Cost of Service Study, in response to
a question asked by Chairman Wagner. Assistant Director/City Engineer
Selle said the item would be brought back to the Committee for discussion
in either April or May.
Item A – Harvey Rd Sidewalk Repair: Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle
suggested removing Item A. The trees have been removed and temporary
sidewalk installed. The permanent sidewalk will be put in as part of the 2012
Sidewalk Replacement Program, which is tracked on the Capital Project
Status Report.
The Committee agreed.
E. Additional Discussion
Chairman Wagner asked who received the Notice of Road Closure which
was distributed to the Committee on Friday. Assistant City Engineer Gaub
answered the residents and businesses in the general area of the project
received the notice and similar information is published on the City’s
website. The notice also went out to the school district, fire, police, the
press, and other public agencies.
The Committee and staff discussed the possibility of publishing the notice
and map in the Auburn Reporter.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works Committee,
the meeting was adjourned at 4:44 p.m.
Approved this 16th day of April, 2012.
Page 8 of 8
CA.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1121
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend the City Council approve Change Order No. 2 in
the amount of $75,000 to Contract No. 11-25 for work on Project No. CP1121, 2011
Local Street Pavement Preservation Phase 2.
Background Summary:
The 2011 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction Project - Phase 2 is the second and final phase of the
2011 Save Our Street (SOS) program. This project is reconstructing 0.5 miles of local streets and
overlaying 0.1 miles of local streets as shown on the attached map. This street work is funded by the 103
(Local Street) Fund.
This project is also replacing undersized water mains; upgrading storm drainage lines; and replacing a
damaged sanitary sewer line as shown on the attached map. This utility work is funded by the respective
utilities.
Change Order No. 2 includes the following items of work:
1.Replacement of the existing 6-inch waterline on 6th Pl NE with a new 8-inch waterline. The existing
waterline is undersized, over 40 years old, and made of cast iron material that is susceptible to
breaking during the construction of the other improvements already planned for the street.
2.The installation of geotextile fabric and a layer of larger aggregates on 3rd St SW to help stabilize
the poor soil conditions found to exist under the existing pavement.
A project budget contingency of $217,539 remains in the 103 (Local Street Pavement Preservation) Fund.
A project budget contingency of $18,232 remains in the 430 (Water) Fund. A project budget contingency
of $31,787 remains in the 431 (Sewer) Fund.
A project budget contingency of $174,128 remains in the 432 (Storm) Fund.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Wickstrom
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B
Project No: CP1121 Project Title:
Project Manager: Seth Wickstrom
Initiation/Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: _December 6, 2010_______ Permission to Advertise
Solicitation Date: _December 2, 2011_____ Contract Award
Award Date: __Janurary 3, 2012________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
103 Fund - Local Street Pavement Preservation 1,021,0001,021,000
430 Fund - Water
(Funds budgeted for CP1121)266,900266,900
430 Fund - Water
(A portion of the 2012 Street Utility Improvements budget)75,00075,000
431 Fund - Sewer
(A portion of the 2012 Street Utility Improvements budget)115,000115,000
431 Fund - Sewer
(A portion of the CP0921 - Biannual Sewer
Repair/Replacement project budget. Used for the F and 4th
St SE sewer replacement work)
65,00765,007
432 Fund - Storm
(Funds budgeted for CP1121)425,400425,400
Total 001,968,3071,968,307
ActivityPrior Years20112012 2013 Total
Design Engineer - City Costs*- -
Construction Contract Bid 1,301,474 1,301,474
Change Order No. 1
(to replace damaged sewer pipe in the F
and 4th St SE intersection)
65,007 65,007
Change Order No. 2
(to replace the waterline on 6th Pl NE and
install geotextile fabric and a layer of
larger aggregates on 3rd St SW)
75,000 75,000
Authorized Contingency 65,140 65,140
Construction Engineering - City Costs*20,000 20,000
Total 001,526,62101,526,621
*City staff costs for street design and construction are not charged against the project budget and are not shown here.
Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
**103 Funds Budgeted ( )00(1,021,000)0(1,021,000)
103 Funds Needed 00803,461803,461
*103 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(217,539)0(217,539)
103 Funds Required 00000
Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
**430 Funds Budgeted ( )00(341,900)0(341,900)
430 Funds Needed 00323,668323,668
**430 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(18,232)0(18,232)
430 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0
Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
**431 Funds Budgeted ( )00(180,007)0(180,007)
431 Funds Needed 00148,220148,220
**431 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(31,787)0(31,787)
431 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0
Prior Years 20092010 Future Years Total
**432 Funds Budgeted ( )00(425,400)0(425,400)
432 Funds Needed 00251,273251,273
**432 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(174,128)0(174,128)
432 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0
** ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates money the City has available.
432 Storm Budget Status
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
2011 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction - Phase 2
Date: April 9, 2012
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
431 Sewer Budget Status
103 Local Street Budget Status
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
430 Water Budget Status
Page 1 of 1
CA.B
CA.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1211
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee grant permission to initiate Project No. CP1211, Downtown
Sculpture Garden.
Background Summary:
This project will include the design and construction of up to ten permanent foundations (as budget
permits) that will accommodate the installation of art sculptures throughout the Downtown area that will
change annually. This portion of the project only focuses on the construction of the foundations. The
artwork portion of the project is being administered by the Parks and Recreation Department through the
Planning and Community Development Committee.
See the attached vicinity map showing the proposed locations.
A budget adjustment of $7,000 from the 330 Local Revitalization Funds may be required this year to fund
the project.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Truong
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:CA.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.C
Project No: CP1211 Project Title:
Project Manager: Kim Truong
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: _________ Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: ________ Contract Award
Award Date: ___________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
330 Local Revitalization Funds 50,000 50,000
001 Parks Professional Services 10,000 10,000
Total 0060,000060,000
Activity Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 012,000 12,000
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 010,500 10,500
Construction Estimate 030,000 30,000
Project Contingency (15%)04,500 4,500
Construction Engineering - City Costs 010,000 10,000
Total 0067,000067,000
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Downtown Sculpture Garden
Date: April 10, 2012
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
*330 Funds Budgeted ( )00(50,000)0 (50,000)
330 Funds Needed 0057,0000 57,000
*330 Fund Project Contingency ( )00000
330 Funds Required 007,00007,000
Prior Years 20112012 2013 Total
*001 Funds Budgeted ( )00(10,000)0 (10,000)
001 Funds Needed 0010,0000 10,000
*001 Fund Project Contingency ( )00000
001 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
001 General Fund Budget Status
330 Local Revitalization Funds Budget Status
H:\PW COMMITTEE\Agenda Bills and Attachments\04-16-12\CP1211\Budget Status Sheet CP1211 PWC
Initiation April 16.xlsx 1 of 1
CA.C
CA.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Horsley Leak Adjustment Appeal
Date:
April 3, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Horsley Letter and Leak Adjustment
Policy
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve an additional water utility adjustment to account number 28039, for
Bob and Gloria Horsley, in the amount of $940.98.
Background Summary:
The owner discovered a water leak on 2/22/12. Per the customer, the leak was repaired over the course of
three days.
The utility account was billed $2,418.22, for water service and consumption of 795 units, due to a leak in
the service line. The owner submitted a request for leak adjustment on February 27, 2012. The total
calculated adjustment was $2,381.95; however, the leak adjustment policy limits the credit to $500.00 for
water only adjustments. The account was credited for $500.00 on March 14, 2012. The owner submitted a
leak adjustment appeal on March 23, 2012. Per the policy, the customer may be considered for an
additional leak adjustment up to 50% of the remaining water portion over $500.00, which would be an
additional adjustment to the account of $940.98.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
DI.A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
February 2012 Financial Report
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
February Financial Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
The purpose of the monthly financial reports is to summarize for the City Council the general state of city-
wide financial affairs and to highlight significant items or trends that the City Council should be aware of.
The following provides a high level summary of the City's financial performance. Further detail can be
found within the attached financial report.
The February status report is based on financial data available as of March 28, 2012. Sales tax
information represents business activity that occurred in December 2011.
General Fund:
The general fund is the City's largest fund and is used to account for the majority of City resources and
services except those required by statute or to be accounted for in another fund.
At the end of February, General Fund revenue collections totaled $7.0 million and compare to budget-to-
date of $7.2 million. Intergovernmental revenues are below budget due to the timing of payments from the
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and lower revenue collections from the red light photo-enforcement program.
General tax revenues, the largest category of revenue within the General Fund, totaled $5.5 million and is
on target with budget. The City's sales tax totaled $2.5 million and is on target with budget and is running
about 4.8% below same period 2011 due primarily to a one-time adjustment by the State of Washington.
Accounting for this one-time adjustment, 2012 sales taxes are running about 1.5% below 2011 levels.
Property tax collections totaled $164,000 and is comparable to collections for the same period 2011.
Approximately 50% of property taxes will be collected in April, coinciding with the first half King County
due date for property tax payments.
General Fund expenses totaled $7.4 million and compare to budget of $8.2 million. Departmental
expenditures are within expectations. SCORE jail expenses are below budget due to the timing of
invoices. A potential issue facing SCORE in 2012 and 2013 may be the financial implications of lower than
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B
expected non-member contracted beds. The SCORE 2012 budget contemplated $3.7 million in contract
bed revenue from non member cities, 75 daily beds. Currently, contract bed revenue is running 10% of
projection, 7.5 beds daily. The Administration board is working with SCORE on how best to market the
beds to potential users. The financial implications of the lower than expected non member contracted beds
will potentially impact Auburn. The 2012 budget for Score is $4.7 million, which is based on 2007 ADP of
100 at $112.50 per day plus an additional $600,000 added in the 2012 mid-term correction in anticipation
of lower than expected contract beds and the likelihood of an additional Maintenance and Operation
charge from SCORE.
Enterprise Funds:
The City's eight enterprise funds account for operations with revenues primarily provided from user fees,
charges or contracts for services.
At the end of February, the Water fund ended at break even. The Sewer fund ended this period with a
$250,000 operating loss. Stormwater revenues are on target and are sufficient to meet expenses. A rate
study update has been completed by City staff for all three utilities the results of which are currently being
reviewed by Council.
The Golf Course ended February with an operating loss of $190,000 and compare to an operating loss of
$183,000 for the same period last year. Financial performance for the Auburn Golf Course is expected to
improve with improvement in weather during the spring and summer.
Cemetery revenues at the end of February totaled $132,000 and were slightly below expenses of
$152,000. A transfer of $200,000 from the Cumulative Reserve Fund to the Cemetery Fund was approved
by Council as part of budget amendment #7 to support anticipated cash flow needs in 2012.
Internal Service Funds:
Internal Service Funds provide services to other City departments and include functions such as
Insurance, Facilities, Information Services, and Equipment Rental. At the end of the year, revenue from
charges assessed to internal client departments was sufficient to meet expenses.
Investment Portfolio:
The City's total cash and investments at the end of February was $98.2 million and was comparable to
January 2012.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
(1) Total Sales Tax revenue includes $334,302 in Streamlined Sales Tax mitigation payments and $9,467 in Pierce
County Park Sales Tax. Streamlined Sales tax payments are expected to total $2 million for the year.
G e n e r a l F u n d 2 011
S u m mar y o f S o u r c es an d U s es
A n n u al Bu d g e t Y T D B u dg et Y T D A c t u al Y T D A c t u al Am o u n t P er c e n t ag e
O P E R A T I N G R E VE N U E S
Property Tax 12,562,565 177,700 163,591 198,113 (14,109) -7.9%
Sales Tax (1)14,295,000 2,463,800 2,495,324 2,622,375 31,524 1.3%
Sales Tax - Annexation Credit1,383,730 243,430 258,121 259,369 14,691 6.0%
Criminal Justice Sales Tax1,212,900 215,200 247,881 233,300 32,681 15.2%
Brokered Natural Gas Tax260,000 57,700 75,623 69,748 17,923 31.1%
City Utilities Tax 2,620,200 410,200 418,759 388,246 8,559 2.1%
Admissions Tax 360,000 65,800 55,895 60,369 (9,905) -15.1%
Electric Tax 3,275,000 826,000 812,586 789,549 (13,414) -1.6%
Natural Gas Tax 1,295,820 321,500 295,289 268,472 (26,211) -8.2%
Cable TV Franchise Fee 703,600 177,200 202,201 204,994 25,001 14.1%
Cable TV Franchise Fee - Capital75,000 18,300 15,824 15,993 (2,476) -13.5%
Telephone Tax 2,012,400 352,100 359,943 375,567 7,843 2.2%
Garbage Tax (external)150,000 27,600 12,381 31,697 (15,219) -55.1%
Leasehold Excise Tax 50,000 12,600 2,401 12,346 (10,199) N/A
Gambling Excise Tax 331,500 110,900 65,768 58,900 (45,132) -40.7%
T a x e s s u b -t o t al 4 0 ,5 87 ,7 1 5 5,48 0,03 0 5,48 1 ,5 8 7 5 ,5 8 9 ,0 39 1 ,5 5 7 0.0%
Business License Fees 200,000 38,300 89,783 74,289 51,483 134.4%
Building Permits 700,000 101,100 155,934 132,791 54,834 54.2%
Other Licenses & Permits229,000 26,800 42,633 35,807 15,833 59.1%
Intergovernmental (Grants, etc)3,756,285 730,200 474,753 726,559 (255,447) -35.0%
Charges for Services:
General Government Services64,600 11,500 18,863 13,019 7,363 64.0%
Public Safety 223,500 39,100 39,657 42,781 557 1.4%
Development Services Fees627,000 80,000 148,307 60,195 68,307 85.4%
Culture and Recreation920,000 124,100 114,137 100,548 (9,963) -8.0%
Fines and Forfeits 2,208,500 416,700 277,784 360,998 (138,916) -33.3%
F ees /C h ar g e s /F i n es s u b -t o t a l 8 ,9 28 ,8 8 5 1,56 7 ,8 0 0 1 ,3 6 1 ,8 5 1 1,5 4 6 ,9 86 (2 05 ,9 49 ) -1 3.1%
Interests and Other Earnings115,000 18,100 10,582 12,222 (7,518) -41.5%
Rents, Leases and Concessions311,000 67,300 43,995 103,952 (23,305) -34.6%
Contributions and Donations20,500 1,700 4,838 3,462 3,138 184.6%
Other Miscellaneous 46,200 5,300 11,677 9,283 6,377 120.3%
Transfers In 17,000 17,000 17,000 32,439 - 0.0%
Insurance Recoveries- Capital & Operating25,000 4,577 10,447 27,003 5,870 128.2%
O t h er R e v e n u e s s u b -t o t al 5 34 ,7 00 1 13 ,9 7 7 9 8 ,5 3 9 18 8 ,3 6 0 (1 5 ,4 38 ) -1 3.5 %
T o t al O p e r a t i n g R e v e n u e s 5 0 ,0 51,3 00 7 ,1 6 1 ,8 0 7 6,94 1 ,9 7 8 7 ,3 2 4 ,3 85 (2 1 9 ,8 29 ) -3 .1%
O p e r a t i n g E x p e n d i t u r es
Council & Mayor 869,890 135,890 128,604 120,357 7,286 5.4%
Municipal Court & Probation3,399,260 485,400 462,130 442,594 23,270 4.8%
Human Resources 886,530 134,500 135,279 117,923 (779) -0.6%
Finance 1,235,590 185,800 171,315 171,059 14,485 7.8%
City Attorney 1,699,500 264,000 240,440 241,341 23,560 8.9%
Planning 3,892,870 633,200 633,159 582,876 41 0.0%
Community & Human Services1,101,360 194,660 200,259 158,348 (5,599) -2.9%
Jail - SCORE 4,726,250 661,300 286,419 - 374,881 56.7%
Police 20,512,690 3,090,000 2,993,331 2,887,107 96,669 3.1%
Engineering 2,623,770 413,570 388,313 354,015 25,257 6.1%
Parks and Recreation 7,552,230 1,096,000 1,073,879 1,009,501 22,121 2.0%
Streets 3,215,280 481,600 417,932 446,605 63,668 13.2%
Non-Departmental 4,736,200 388,900 286,813 255,543 102,087 26.3%
T o t al O p e r a t i n g E x p e n di t u r es 5 6 ,4 51,4 2 0 8 ,16 4 ,8 2 0 7,417 ,8 7 3 6 ,7 8 7 ,2 69 7 4 6 ,9 47 9 .1%
201 2 201 2 Y T D Bu d g e t v s . A c t u al
F a v o r a b l e (U n fa v o r a b l e )
1
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Overview
7KLVILQDQFLDORYHUYLHZUHIOHFWVWKH&LW\·VRYHUDOOILQDQFLDOSRVLWLRQIRUWKHILVFDOperiod ending
February 29, 2012 and represents financial data available as of March 28, 2012. The budgeted
year-to-date revenues and operating expenses are primarily based on the collection/disbursement
average for the same period of the two prior years.
General Fund revenue highlights include:
- Tax revenues totaled $5.5 million and are on target with budget. Sales taxes, including
estimated streamlined sales tax mitigation payments and sales taxes from Pierce County
parks, totaled $2.5 million and were nearly equal to the same period in 2011. Retail sales
activity continues to gradually improve, mirroring the regional and national improvement
in employment and consumer confidence and spending.
- Revenues from fees, charges and fines totaled $1.4 million and were below budget,
reflecting the timing of reimbursements and lowered revenue from red-light photo
enforcement traffic fines.
- Other revenues totaled $98,500 and were slightly below budget and reflect lowered
revenue from rents and leases.
General Fund expenses totaled $7.4 million and were below budget, reflecting the timing of
invoices from SCORE for municipal jail services.
SCORE assessments to member cities, including the City of Auburn, is based on the number of
bed days and the number of contracted bed days from non-member agencies. The SCORE 2012
budget contemplated $3.7 million in contract bed revenue from non member cities, 75 daily
beds. Currently, contract bed revenue is running 10% of projection, 7.5 beds daily. The
Administration board is working with SCORE on how best to market the beds to potential users.
The financial implications of the lower than expected non member contracted beds will
potentially impact Auburn. The 2012 budget for Score is $4.7 million, which is based on 2007
ADP of 100 at $112.50 per day plus an additional $600,000 added in the 2012 mid-term
correction in anticipation of lower than expected contract beds and the likelihood of an
additional Maintenance and Operation charge from SCORE.
Non-departmental expenditures were also below budget, and reflect unspent budget for
retirement benefits.
Revenues
The combined total of property tax, sales/use tax, utility tax, gambling, and admissions tax
provide approximately 80% of all resources supporting general governmental activities. The
following section provides detail information on these sources.
Property Tax collections to-date totaled $164,000 and compare to budget of $178,000. The
majority of property tax revenues are collected during the months of April and October,
coinciding with the due date for County property tax billings.
2
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Sales taxes totaled $2.5 million and are on-target with budget-to-date and is running about 1.5%
below 2011 levels after accounting for a one-time adjustment by the State of Washington. Total
collections for 2012 are expected to slightly exceed annual budget of $14.3 million reflecting the
gradual strengthening of the regional and national economies. Sales taxes include an allocated
payment of $334,000 for Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation payments.
The following WDEOHEUHDNVRXWWKH&LW\·VEDVHVDOHVWD[, excluding Criminal Justice, Annexation
Credit and Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation by major business sectors.
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mill
ions
Pro perty Ta xes
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
$8.0
$10.0
$12.0
$14.0
$16.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Millions
S a les & U se Tax
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
3
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Note: 2012 actuals includes two one-time correcting adjustments totaling $94,000 by Washington State Department of Revenue.
Accounting for this correction, February sales taxes would have totaled $2,298,441, or 1.5% less than the same period 2011.
Utility Tax consists of City inter-fund utility taxes (Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste) and
external utility taxes (Electric, Natural gas, Telephone and Solid Waste). February collections
totaled $1.9 million and are on-target with expectations.
The following table presents utility tax collections by source:
Cable TV Franchise Fees remain unchanged as these fees are collected quarterly. To-date,
collections are above budget and similar to 2011 collection levels. This revenue source is likely to
outperform budget by the end of 2012 and end at levels similar to the previous year.
2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2
C omp o n e n t Gr ou p Act ual Act u al Amou n t Perce n t ag e
New Construction225,397 212,148 (13,249) -5.9%
Manufacturing153,306 9,897 (143,409) -93.5%
Transportation & Warehousing12,804 7,809 (4,995) -39.0%
Wholesale Trade206,041 215,398 9,357 4.5%
Automotive436,051 461,993 25,942 5.9%
Retail Trade800,593 790,290 (10,303) -1.3%
Services487,324 500,034 12,710 2.6%
Miscellaneous12,300 6,887 (5,413) -44.0%
YTD Total2,333,816 2,204,456 (129,360) -5.5%
C han g e f ro m 2 0 1 1
Year t o Dat e t hr ou g h F ebr uary
C omp aris on o f Sale s T ax C ollec t io n s by SI C Gr oup
$0.0
$1.0
$2.0
$3.0
$4.0
$5.0
$6.0
$7.0
$8.0
$9.0
$10.0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
M
i
llions
U tility Ta x
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2
M on t h Act ual B ud g et Act ual Amo un t Percen t ag e Amoun t Per cen t ag e
City Interfund Utility Taxes388,246 410,200 418,759 30,513 7.9%8,559 2.1%
Electric 789,549 826,000 812,586 23,037 2.9%(13,414) -1.6%
Natural Gas268,472 321,500 295,289 26,817 10.0%(26,211) -8.2%
Telephone375,567 352,100 359,943 (15,624) -4.2%7,843 2.2%
Solid Waste31,697 27,600 12,381 (19,316) -60.9%(15,219) -55.1%
YTD Total1,853,532 1,937,400 1,898,958 45,426 2.5%(38,442) -2.0%
Annual Total8,890,614 9,353,420
Y ear t o Dat e t hroug h F ebr uary
U t ilit y Tax by T y p e
2 01 2 vs. 2 0 1 1 2 01 2 vs . B ud g et
4
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Licenses and Permits include business licenses, building permits, plumbing, electric and other
licenses and permit fees. Building permit fees and Business licenses make up 80% of the annual
budgeted revenue in this category.
Total building permit revenues at the end of February were $156,000 and was ahead of both
budget and prior year levels. The increase in February is primarily due to permits related to
developments at Kendall Ridge.
Business License revenues totaled $89,780 and exceed budget, due to the timing of payments.
The revenue for the year is billed out late in December and most payments are received between
January and February.
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter
T
housands
C able TV Fr anchise Fe e
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
housands
Bu ilding Permits
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
5
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Intergovernmental include Grants (Direct & Indirect Federal, State and Local); State shared
revenues and compact revenue from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. February collections were
below budget due primarily to the timing of reimbursements from the Muckleshoot Casino for
public safety services.
State shared revenues totaled $210,000. The 2012 budget for the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax has
not yet been adjusted to reflect the change in revenue recognition to the Arterial Street fund and
Recreational Trails fund. This adjustment will be included in the next budget adjustment
ordinance to the City Council.
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
h
o
u
sands
B u s i nes s L i c ens es
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2
R even ue Ac t u al B ud g et Ac t ual % C han g e % Chan g e
Federal Grants100 600 - N/A-100.0%
State Grants- - - N/A0.0%
Interlocal Grants8,334 7,500 2,500 -70.0%-66.7%
State Shared Revenue371,600 369,500 301,665 -18.8%-18.4%
Muckleshoot Casino Emerg.335,525 352,600 163,281 -51.3%-53.7%
Intergovernmental Service11,000 - - -100.0%N/A
YTD Total726,559 730,200 467,446 -35.7%-36.0%
Annual Total3,432,394 3,756,285
YTD %21%19%12%
Year t o Dat e t hroug h F ebruar y
I n t er g o vern men t al
2 0 1 2 vs . 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 vs . B ud g et
6
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Charges for Services consists of general governmental services, public safety, development service
fees and cultural & recreation fees. Development services and culture & recreation revenues make
up approximately 80% of revenue for this category. Revenues in this category total $321,000
and are above budget due primarily to stronger revenues from development plan-check fees,
offsetting lower than expected revenue from recreation classes.
Culture & Recreation revenues totaled $114,000 and consist of theater ticket sales, recreational
classes, arts commission and senior citizen program fees. Collections are comparable to 2011
levels and are running below budget due to lower revenue from adult health & fitness classes and
afterschool programs.
2 01 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2
Reven ue Act ual Bud g et Act ual Amoun t P er cen t ag e Amo un t Perc en t ag e
Trial Court Improvements- 3,100 5,658 5,658 N/A2,558 N/A
Court Interpreter Program- - - - N/A- N/A
Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax231,715 241,500 156,793 (74,922) -32.3%(84,707) -35.1%
Criminal Justice -High Crime37,353 - 35,698 (1,655) -4.4%35,698 N/A
Criminal Justice -Population3,817 25,100 3,884 67 1.8%(21,216) -84.5%
Criminal Justice -Spec. Prog.14,412 13,800 14,657 245 1.7%857 6.2%
State DUI3,107 1,600 3,389 282 9.1%1,789 111.8%
Fire Insurance Premium Tax- - - - N/A- N/A
Liquor Excise Tax81,197 84,400 81,587 390 0.5%(2,813) -3.3%
Liquor Profits- - - - N/A- N/A
YTD Total371,600 369,500 301,665 (69,935) -18.8%(67,835) -18.4%
Annual Total2,073,650 2,540,130
Y ear t o Dat e t hrou g h F ebr u ar y
St at e Shared R ev e n u es
2 0 1 2 v s . 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 v s . Bud g et
2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2
R ev en ue Act ual B ud g et Ac t ual Amou n t P ercen t ag e Amoun t P ercen t ag e
General Government13,019 11,500 18,863 5,844 44.89%7,363 64.02%
Public Safety42,781 39,100 39,657 (3,124) -7.3%557 1.4%
Development Services60,195 80,000 148,307 88,113 146.4%68,307 85.4%
Culture & Recreation100,548 124,100 114,137 13,589 13.5%(9,963) -8.0%
YTD Total216,543 254,700 320,965 104,421 48.2%66,265 26.0%
Annual Total1,651,371 1,835,100
Year t o Dat e t hro ug h F e bru ary
C harg es for Services by Ty p e
2 0 1 2 v s . 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 vs . B ud g et
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
ho
usands
D evelopment S ervice Fe es
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
7
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Fines & Penalties totaled $278,000 and compare to budget of $472,000. Financial performance
is below budget due to lower photo enforcement revenues and non-court fines and penalties.
This category includes traffic and parking infraction penalties, criminal (traffic, non traffic and
costs) and false alarm fines.
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
$1,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
h
ousands
C u lture & Re cr eation
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
2 01 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 2
Mo n t h Act ual Bud g et Act ual Amoun t Pe rcen t ag e Amou n t Per cen t ag e
Civil Penalties2,789 2,500 2,440 (349) -12.5%(60) -2.4%
Civil Infraction Penalties110,416 101,500 117,577 7,162 6.5%16,077 15.8%
Red Light Photo Enforcement167,592 239,900 100,944 (66,648) -39.8%(138,956) -57.9%
Parking Infractions29,001 28,800 18,497 (10,504) -36.2%(10,303) -35.8%
Criminal Traffic Misdemeanor16,269 19,100 19,047 2,778 17.1%(53) -0.3%
Criminal Non-Traffic Fines13,795 15,300 14,343 548 4.0%(957) -6.3%
Criminal Costs3,267 2,300 2,824 (443) -13.6%524 22.8%
Non-Court Fines & Penalties79,462 63,000 2,112 (77,350) -97.3%(60,888) -96.6%
YTD Total422,590 472,400 277,784 (144,806) -34.3%(194,616) -41.2%
Annual Total1,940,326 2,208,500
Year t o Dat e t hroug h F ebru ar y
F in es & F o r feit s by Ty p e
2 01 2 vs . 2 01 1 2 01 2 vs . Bu d g et
8
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Miscellaneous revenues include interest and other investment earnings, rents, leases &
concessions, contributions & donations and other miscellaneous income. February revenues in
this category totaled $71,000 and are below budget, due primarily to the timing of revenues
from rents and leases and investment income.
$0.0
$0.5
$1.0
$1.5
$2.0
$2.5
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Mi
ll
ions
Fi n es & Pen alties
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
$1.4
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Millions
P h oto E n f orcement
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 01 2
Mon t h Act ual Bu dg et Act ual Amoun t Percen t ag e Amoun t Per cen t ag e
Interest & Investments12,222 18,100 10,582 (1,639) -13.4%(7,518) -41.5%
Rents & Leases103,952 67,300 43,995 (59,957) -57.7%(23,305) -34.6%
Contributions & Donations3,462 1,700 4,838 1,376 39.8%3,138 184.6%
Other Miscellaneous Revenue9,283 5,300 11,677 2,394 25.8%6,377 120.3%
YTD Total128,918 92,400 71,092 (57,825) -44.9%(21,308) -23.1%
Annual Total649,927 492,700
Mis cellan eou s Reven ues by Typ e
Y ear t o Dat e t hroug h F ebruar y
2 01 2 vs . 2 01 1 2 0 1 2 v s . B ud g et
9
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is received into the Capital Improvement Projects Fund
and is used for governmental capital projects. Revenue at the end of February totaled $217,000,
and is exceeding budget and prior year performance.
$0.0
$0.2
$0.4
$0.6
$0.8
$1.0
$1.2
$1.4
$1.6
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Millions
Real E state E x cise Tax
2012 budget
2012 actual to date
2011 actual
10
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Enterprise Funds
The following table provides an analysis of all City Enterprise funds through February 2012.
WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCemeteryGolf
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for services 1,352,637 739,853 1,201,270 1,859,470 2,614 131,496 58,721
Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 2,130,971 - - - - -
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other- - - - 102,950 293 12,931
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES1,352,637 2,870,824 1,201,270 1,859,470 105,564 131,789 71,652
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration 400,322 321,831 389,130 123,170 118,946 47,306 36,999
Operations & Maintenance558,767 405,994 412,464 141,301 - 94,956 171,726
Waste Management Payments - - - 716,782 - - -
Sewer Metro Services - 2,089,194 - - - - -
Depreciation & Amortization365,035 302,183 212,770 3,137 64,624 9,889 52,732
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES1,324,124 3,119,202 1,014,364 984,390 183,570 152,151 261,457
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)28,513 (248,378) 186,906 875,080 (78,006) (20,362) (189,805)
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 3,509 2,138 2,034 81 247 20 77
Other Non Operating Revenue 441 330 1,854 440 95 - -
Other Non Operating Expense - - - - - - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)3,950 2,468 3,888 521 342 20 77
32,463 (245,910) 190,794 875,601 (77,664) (20,342) (189,728)
Contributions 39,608 27,056 32,560 - - - -
Transfers In - - - - - - 2,353
Transfers Out (50,000) (50,000) (50,000) - - - -
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS(10,392) (22,944) (17,440) - - - 2,353
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE 22,071 (268,854) 173,354 875,601 (77,664) (20,342) (187,375)
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE, January 1, 201263,028,695 73,274,006 47,772,204 760,681 9,731,158 814,709 5,144,962
ENDING FUND BALANCE, February 29, 201263,050,766 73,005,152 47,945,558 1,636,282 9,653,494 794,367 4,957,587
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS &
TRANSFERS
11
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
The following table presents the Enterprise funds working capital statements. Working capital is
generally defined as the difference between current assets and current liabilities.
WaterSewerStormSolid WasteAirportCemeteryGolf
OPERATING REVENUES
Charges for services 1,352,637 739,853 1,201,270 1,859,470 2,614 131,496 58,721
Sewer Metro Service Revenue - 2,130,971 - - - - -
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other- - - - 102,950 293 12,931
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES1,352,637 2,870,824 1,201,270 1,859,470 105,564 131,789 71,652
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries & Wages 343,359 233,824 304,387 71,083 3,179 71,741 86,869
Benefits 150,174 98,930 132,494 30,799 1,072 37,355 43,727
Supplies 25,392 7,513 5,256 458 - 11,380 29,777
Other Service Charges 267,843 256,705 137,584 131,381 114,695 10,768 21,350
Intergovernmental Services - - - - - - -
Waste Management Payments - - - 716,782 - - -
Sewer Metro Services - 2,089,194 - - - - -
Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies172,321 130,853 221,873 30,750 - 11,018 27,002
Depreciation & Amortization365,035 302,183 212,770 3,137 64,624 9,889 52,732
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES1,324,124 3,119,202 1,014,364 984,390 183,570 152,151 261,457
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)28,513 (248,378) 186,906 875,080 (78,006) (20,362) (189,805)
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 3,509 2,138 2,034 81 247 20 77
Other Non Operating Revenue 441 330 1,854 440 95 - -
Other Non Operating Expense - - - - - - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)3,950 2,468 3,888 521 342 20 77
Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital
Depreciation 365,035 302,183 212,770 3,137 64,624 9,889 52,732
397,498 56,273 403,564 878,738 (13,040) (10,453) (136,996)
Increase in Contributions -System Development39,608 27,056 32,560 - - - -
Increase in Contributions -Area Assessments- - - - - - -
Increase in Contributions -FAA Grants- - - - - - -
Increase in Contributions -KC Flood Zone Dist.- - - - - - -
Operating Transfers In - - - - - - 2,353
Increase in Restricted Net Assets 2,752 - - - (2,087) -
Decrease in Long term Receivables- - - - - - -
Increase in Deferred Credits - - - - (8,479) - -
TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS42,360 27,056 32,560 - (10,566) - 2,353
Net Change in Restricted Net Assets 266 92 187 - (1,998) - 2,085
Increase in Fixed Assets - Salaries23,658 20,278 4,835 - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Benefits9,548 7,293 2,295 - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Site Improvements12,687 - - - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment- - - - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction135,321 92,595 38,977 - - - -
Operating Transfers Out 50,000 50,000 50,000 - - - -
Debt Service Principal - - - - - - -
TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS231,480 170,258 96,294 - (1,998) - 2,085
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL208,378 (86,929) 339,830 878,738 (21,608) (10,453) (136,728)
BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL, January 1, 201216,945,811 12,806,527 9,102,000 632,263 961,633 71,820 68,320
ENDING WORKING CAPITAL, February 29, 201217,154,189 12,719,598 9,441,830 1,511,001 940,025 61,367 (68,408)
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL208,378 (86,929) 339,830 878,738 (21,608) (10,453) (136,728)
NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS
12
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
The Water Utility ended February at break-even and compares to a $53,000 net operating loss
for the same period last year, reflecting an improvement in water sales and a slight improvement
in water consumption.
The Sewer utility ended February with a $248,000 operating loss, comparable to 2011 when it
ended with an operating loss of $262,000. Year-to-date Metro billings totaled $2.1 million and
were sufficient to meet Metro payments. The Stormwater utility ended February with $187,000
in operating income as compared to a $137,000 operating income in 2011.
A rate study is currently underway to evaluate the revised rate revenue requirements for the
water, sewer, and stormwater utilities. Results of the rate study will be reviewed with the
Council during the first quarter 2012.
Financial performance for the Auburn Golf Course was nearly unchanged over the previous year.
The Golf Course ended February with a net operating loss of $190,000 as compared to an
operating loss of $183,000 for the same period 2011. The financial performance for the Golf
Course is expected to improve with the spring and summer period.
-
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Wa t er Re venues ($) vs Wate r Sol d (c cf)
20 1 1 -Present
2011 Water Sales ($)
2012 Water Sales ($)
2011 Water Sold (ccf)
2012 Water Sold (ccf)
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
h
o
usan
ds
G olf C ourse O perating Rev enues b y Month
(20 12 vs 20 11)
2012 Monthly Budget
2012 Actual
2011 Actual
13
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
The Cemetery Fund ended February with a $20,000 operating loss as compared to an operating
loss of $34,000 for the previous year, reflecting an increase in lot sales in February 2011.
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
T
h
o
us
an
ds
C emeter y Operating Rev enues by M onth
(20 11 vs 2 0 10)
2012 Monthly Budget
2012 Actual
2011 Actual
14
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
Internal Service Funds
The table below provides an analysis of all City Internal Service funds and shows 2012 revenues
and expenditures for each fund.
InformationEquipment
InsuranceFacilities ServicesRental
OPERATING REVENUES:
Interfund Charges for services - 567,911 689,184 114,517
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 27,130 13,451 387,250
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 595,041 702,635 501,767
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Administration - - 126,034 114,075
Insurance fund -Unemployment Claims- - - -
Operations & Maintenance 899,683 351,499 684,168 228,100
Depreciation & Amortization - - 92,997 121,683
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 899,683 351,499 903,199 463,858
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(899,683) 243,542 (200,564) 37,909
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 275 421 706 832
Other Non Operating Revenue (sale of fixed asset)- - - 30,472
Other Non Operating Expense - - - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)275 421 706 31,304
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS(899,408) 243,963 (199,858) 69,213
Contributions - - - -
Transfers In - - - -
Transfers Out - - - (7,000)
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS & TRANSFERS- - - (7,000)
CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE (899,408) 243,963 (199,858) 62,213
BEGINNING FUND BALANCE, January 1, 20122,184,680 1,570,419 4,350,183 10,135,919
ENDING FUND BALANCE, February 29, 20121,285,272 1,814,382 4,150,325 10,198,132
15
DI.B
Monthly Financial Report February 2012
The working capital statements for the Internal Service funds are presented on the table below.
Other services and charges within the Insurance Fund represent the premium cost-pool that will
be allocated monthly to other City funds over the course of 2012. As a result, this balance will
gradually diminish each month through December. The Information Services Fund ended
February with an operating loss, reflecting the timing of expenditures. No significant variances
are reported for the Facilities Fund and Equipment Rental Fund. Both funds had sufficient
revenues to cover expenses during February.
Contact Information
This report is prepared by the Finance Department. Additional financial information can also be
viewed at our website: http://www.auburnwa.gov/. For any questions about the report please
contact us at mchaw@auburnwa.gov or scoleman@auburnwa.gov.
InformationEquipment
InsuranceFacilities ServicesRental
OPERATING REVENUES:
Interfund Charges for services - 567,911 689,184 114,517
Rents, Leases, Concessions & Other - 27,130 13,451 387,250
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES - 595,041 702,635 501,767
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Salaries & Wages - 108,102 216,999 70,584
Benefits - 47,279 90,471 27,520
Supplies - 9,977 44,845 146,321
Other Service Charges 899,683 169,825 409,707 62,125
Interfund Operating Rentals/Supplies - 16,316 48,180 35,625
Depreciation & Amortization - - 92,997 121,683
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 899,683 351,499 903,199 463,858
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)(899,683) 243,542 (200,564) 37,909
NON-OPERATING REVENUES & EXPENSES
Interest Revenue 275 421 706 832
Other Non Operating Revenue (sale of fixed asset)- - - 30,472
Other Non Operating Expense - - - -
TOTAL NON-OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)275 421 706 31,304
Plus Items Not Effecting Working Capital
Depreciation - - 92,997 121,683
(899,408) 243,963 (106,861) 190,896
Increase in Contributions -Other Government- - - -
Increase in Contributions -Other Funds - - -
TOTAL RESOURCES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS- - - -
Net Change in Restricted Net Assets - - - -
Increase in Fixed Assets - Equipment - - 17,647 277,345
Increase in Fixed Assets - Construction - - - -
Operating Transfers Out - - - 7,000
TOTAL USES OTHER THAN OPERATIONS - - 17,647 284,345
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL(899,408) 243,963 (124,508) (93,449)
BEGINNING WORING CAPITAL, January 1, 20122,184,680 1,622,449 3,118,686 5,793,165
ENDING WORKING CAPITAL, February 29, 20121,285,272 1,866,412 2,994,178 5,699,716
NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL(899,408) 243,963 (124,508) (93,449)
NET WORKING CAPITAL FROM OPERATIONS
16
DI.B
SALES TAX SUMMARY
FEBRUARY 2012 SALES TAX DISTRIBUTIONS (FOR NOVEMBER - DECEMBER 2011 RETAIL ACTIVITY)
2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD 2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD
NAICSCONSTRUCTION (Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% DiffNAICSAUTOMOTIVE(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff
236 Construction of Buildings 582,840 91,676 81,952 -10.6%441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer2,560,962 399,779 424,631 6.2%
237 Heavy and Civil Construction 108,727 17,549 26,097 48.7%447 Gasoline Stations 224,459 36,272 37,362 3.0%
238 Specialty Trade Contractors 604,245 116,172 104,099 -10.4%TOTAL AUTOMOTIVE 2,785,421$ 436,051$ 461,993$ 5.9%
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 1,295,813$ 225,397$ 212,148$ -5.9%Overall Change from Previous Year 25,942$
Overall Change from Previous Year (13,250)$
2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD
2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTDNAICSRETAIL TRADE(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff
NAICSMANUFACTURING(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings218,335 39,742 45,362 14.1%
311 Food Manufacturing 2,674 370 708 91.3%443 Electronics and Appliances126,870 26,642 32,694 22.7%
312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 3,864 772 772 0.0%444 Building Material and Garden382,504 54,616 59,716 9.3%
313 Textile Mills 959 42 24 -43.6%445 Food and Beverage Stores330,776 60,402 57,374 -5.0%
314 Textile Product Mills 2,625 344 484 40.7%446 Health and Personal Care Store148,387 30,279 31,881 5.3%
315 Apparel Manufacturing 2,519 2,294 149 -93.5%448 Clothing and Accessories 754,407 168,590 168,950 0.2%
316 Leather and Allied Products 175 6 36 542.7%451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books126,042 30,862 29,870 -3.2%
321 Wood Product Manufacturing 24,075 3,839 3,223 -16.0%452 General Merchandise Stores967,627 236,144 223,261 -5.5%
322 Paper Manufacturing 11,026 1,998 606 -69.6%453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers489,259 95,919 83,878 -12.6%
323 Printing and Related Support 38,511 8,059 6,162 -23.5%454 Nonstore Retailers 235,923 57,397 57,305 -0.2%
324 Petroleum and Coal Products 9,771 410 1,413 245.1%TOTAL RETAIL TRADE3,780,129$ 800,593$ 790,290$ -1.3%
325 Chemical Manufacturing 7,937 952 899 -5.5%Overall Change from Previous Year (10,303)$
326 Plastics and Rubber Products 9,777 1,381 1,907 38.1%
327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 16,218 2,021 2,478 22.6%
331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 452 22 435 1890.8%2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD
332 Fabricated Metal Product Manuf 19,661 2,790 2,003 -28.2%NAICSSERVICES(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff
333 Machinery Manufacturing 14,242 2,455 1,965 -19.9%51*Information 481,043 68,776 65,882 -4.2%
334 Computer and Electronic Produc 16,776 2,943 844 -71.3%52*Finance and Insurance 65,518 11,487 (6,861) b -159.7%
335 Electric Equipment, Appliances 780 21 164 676.3%53*Real Estate, Rental, Leasing303,750 48,038 62,860 30.9%
336 Transportation Equipment Man 362,149 115,206 (20,287) a -117.6%541 Professional, Scientific, Tech174,718 33,616 34,206 1.8%
337 Furniture and Related Products 13,135 1,748 1,789 2.3%551 Company Management 351 36 4 -90.0%
339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 25,531 5,635 4,122 -26.8%56*Admin. Supp., Remed Svcs294,603 43,952 42,152 -4.1%
TOTAL MANUFACTURING 582,858$ 153,306$ 9,897$ -93.5%611 Educational Services 52,563 4,718 5,178 9.7%
Overall Change from Previous Year (143,409)$ 62*Health Care Social Assistannce40,737 5,180 9,891 90.9%
71*Arts and Entertainment 148,629 64,463 65,193 1.1%
72*Accomodation and Food Svcs838,924 128,484 144,224 12.3%
2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD 81*Other Services 389,241 65,007 64,575 -0.7%
NAICSTRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff 92*Public Administration 92,163 13,566 12,731 -6.2%
481 Air Transportation 24 24 - -100.0%TOTAL SERVICES 2,882,241$ 487,324$ 500,034$ 2.6%
482 Rail Transportation 17,831 7,120 1,627 -77.1%Overall Change from Previous Year 12,709$
484 Truck Transportation 36,261 1,506 1,845 22.5%
485 Transit and Ground Passengers 68 39 212 448.4%
488 Transportation Support 18,083 2,887 2,852 -1.2%2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD
491 Postal Service 202 47 46 -1.1%NAICSMISCELLANEOUS(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff
492 Couriers and Messengers 1,492 522 108 -79.4%000 Unknown 1,958 - - N/A
493 Warehousing and Storage 3,121 659 1,119 69.7%111-115Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 7,355 1,149 264 -77.1%
TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 77,083$ 12,804$ 7,809$ -39.0%211-221Mining & Utilities 21,830 2,187 3,596 64.4%
Overall Change from Previous Year (4,994)$ 999 Unclassifiable Establishments192,496 8,964 3,027 -66.2%
TOTAL SERVICES 223,639$ 12,300$ 6,887$ -44.0%
Overall Change from Previous Year (5,414)$
2011 Annual Total2011 YTD2012 YTDYTD
NAICSWHOLESALE TRADE(Nov '10-Oct '11)(Nov '10-Dec '10)(Nov '11-Dec '11)% Diff
423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods1,095,905 182,046 192,995 6.0%GRAND TOTAL 12,887,267$ 2,333,816$ 2,204,455$
424 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable 150,480 23,484 21,544 -8.3%Overall Change from Previous Year (129,361)$ -5.5%
425 Wholesale Electronic Markets 13,698 510 859 68.5%
TOTAL WHOLESALE 1,260,083$ 206,041$ 215,398$ 4.5%
Overall Change from Previous Year 9,357$
a. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Nov 2011 (adjustment: -$73,971).
a. Wa. State Dept of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for period Dec 2011 (adjustment: -$20,014).
02/23/12 file:Monthly Sales Tax Report.xls
Prepared by Auburn Financial Planning
17
DI.B
InvestmentPurchasePurchaseMaturityYield to
TypeDatePriceDateMaturity
State Investment PoolVarious 79,107,271$ Various 0.14%
KeyBank Money MarketVarious 9,080,959 Various 0.15%
US Treasury 05/04/199057,75005/15/20165.72%
FHLB 3/28/20112,000,0003/28/20141.300%
FFCB 6/6/20112,000,0006/6/20141.180%
FHLB 6/13/20112,000,0006/13/20141.150%
FHLMC 12/19/20112,000,00012/19/20141.000%
FNMA 12/29/20112,000,00012/29/20140.900%
Total Cash & Investments 98,245,980$ 0.242%
Investment Mix% of Total
State Investment Pool 80.5%Current 6-month treasury rate 0.12%
KeyBank Money Market 9.2%Current State Pool rate 0.14%
US Treasury 0.1%KeyBank Money Market 0.15%
FHLB 4.1%Blended Auburn rate 0.24%
FFCB 2.0%
FHLMC 2.0%
FNMA 2.0%
100.0%
City of Auburn
Investment Portfolio Summary
February 29,2012
Summary
18
DI.B
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6407
Date:
April 5, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6407
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Committee to discuss proposed amendments to the P-1, Public Use District; as it relates
to animal shelters (ZOA12-0004).
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn City Council has previously authorized a contract with the Auburn Valley Humane
Society for the provision of public animal shelter services at 4910 A Street SE, a City owned property. This
property is currently zoned P-1, Public Use District. Current zoning regulations for the P-1 district do not
specify public animal shelter services as a permitted use in this zone. In order to support the intended
public animal shelter services at this property, staff has determined the need to amend the Auburn City
Code.
The amendment to the Auburn City Code would add "Animal shelter, public" as a permitted use to Chapter
18.40 (Public Use District) of the Auburn City Code. Further, a new definition of "Animal shelter, public"
would be added to Chapter 18.04 (Definitions). The addition of "Animal shelter, public" to the list of
permitted uses is consistent with the intent statement of the P-1 district "to provide for the location and
development of public uses that serve the cultural, educational, recreational, and public service needs of
the community." Animal shelters house homeless, lost, or abandoned animals; primarily a large variety of
dogs and cats and the goal of today's animal shelter is to provide a safe and caring environment until the
animal is either reclaimed by its owner, placed in a new home, or placed with another organization. As
such, animal shelters serve a public purpose.
On February 7, 2012 and March 6, 2012 the City of Auburn Planning Commission conducted a duly
noticed work study session to review and discuss with staff the proposed amendments to the P-1 District.
On March 20, 2012 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on the amendments. At
the close of the public hearing the Planning Commission concurred with staff and made a
recommendation to the City Council for adoption of the proposed code amendments.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Planning Commission,
Legal
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:S. Wagner
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C
DI.C
DI.C
DI.C
DI.C
DI.C
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4808
Date:
April 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4808
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Finance Committee to recommend that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 4808.
Background Summary:
Public Works
6101E-1997 Dodge Intrepid, VIN 2B3HD46F7VH625512, Fixed Asset Number 55000 6101E This vehicle
is a former Mayoral car that has been retained as a spare. The car is little utilized, and in fair but unreliable
running condition. It is best for the City to realize the money from sale than to continue to allow the general
overall condition to deteriorate by sitting idle, further diminishing its resale value.
P060C Kia Sportage VIN KNDJB723115051087 Fixed Asset Number 55000 P060C This vehicle was used
in Police Operations as a parking enforcement vehicle. It is in fair running condition and has 66,418 miles.
It is not a vehicle that could be utilized by other Departments. It is best for the City to realize the money
from sale than to allow the general overall condition to deteriorate by sitting idle, further diminishing its
resale value.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Partridge Staff:Bailey
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 4808
April 11, 2012
Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4808
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DECLARING
CERTAIN ITEMS OF PROPERTY AS SURPLUS
AND AUTHORIZING THEIR DISPOSAL
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Public Works Department has a number of
items which are no longer of use to the City; and
WHEREAS, it would be appropriate to surplus the property and dispose of
it by auction or other sale mechanism, or to dispose of it, in whole or in part,
through gift to another governmental agency or an appropriate charitable non-
profit entity, as deemed most expedient by the Mayor.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. That the property identified below is declared
to be surplus, and the Mayor is authorized to dispose of and convey such
property through appropriate sale or donation to another governmental agency or
charitable non-profit entity.
Public Works
The following items are worn and becoming increasingly costly to maintain and are
of no further use as fleet vehicles:
6101E-1997 Dodge Intrepid, VIN 2B3HD46F7VH625512, Fixed Asset Number
55000 6101E, former Mayoral vehicle
P060C Kia Sportage VIN KNDJB723115051087 Fixed Asset Number 55000 P060C,
Parking Enforcement vehicle
DI.D
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 4808
April 11, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Section 2. Implementation. That the Mayor is authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directives of this legislation.
Section 3. Effective Date. That this Resolution shall take effect
and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
________________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
ATTEST: MAYOR
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
DI.D
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Mill Creek Basin Flow Control Exemption
Date:
April 11, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Green River and Mill Creek Direct
Discharge Exemption/Modification
Figure 1
Figure 2
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
The Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (Permit), issued in January 2007 by the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) requires most new development and redevelopment
projects to control stormwater runoff flow rates to "forested" conditions. Matching forested peak flow rates
requires standard stormwater facilities that are much larger and more costly than those designed to match
pre-developed conditions. The intent of this standard is to prevent stream channel erosion and instability,
however the Permit allows local governments to modify there flow control requirements where watershed-
scale studies show that the standard requirements are not appropriate (e.g., streams with very flat
gradients).
Initial efforts to seek a modification where directed toward the Green River. The results of that effort where
reviewed with the Ecology, however they determined that this request could not be granted. Further
discussions revealed that the Mill Creek Basin may be a candidate for the modified flow control
requirement due to its flat-gradient and overall stable channel characteristics. If Ecology granted a flow
control exemption, or reduction it would be a significant encouragement to redevelopment within a large
portion of the Auburn downtown area.
Staff believes that there is merit in conducting the Mill Creek Basin Plan, and with concurrence from the
Public Works Committee, bring back a professional services contract at the April 30th meeting for
approval.
This proposal is on the Committee Agenda as a discussion item April 16th. The following attachments are
provided to assist in the discussion:
Green River and Mill Creek Direct Discharge Exemption/Modification - Stormwater Flow Control in
Highly Urbanized Areas of Auburn
Figure 1 - Green River Basin Land Cover Change Analysis for Direct Discharge
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F
Figure 2 - Mill Creek Basin Data Review and Evaluation for Direct Discharge.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Carlaw
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F
Page 1 PDFConvert.2779.1.Mill_Creek_Flow_Control.docx
Green River and Mill Creek Direct Discharge
Exemption/Modification
Stormwater Flow Control in Highly Urbanized Areas of Auburn
Introduction
• The City of Auburn is covered by the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit
(Permit), issued in January 2007 by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The Permit
requires most new development and redevelopment projects to control stormwater flow rates and
durations to match “forested” conditions. This “standard” flow control requirement is intended to
prevent accelerated stream channel erosion1.
• Matching forested peak flow rates and flow durations generally requires stormwater facilities that are
much larger and more costly than facilities designed solely to match pre-developed peak flows.
Furthermore, flow duration control requirements in the next Permit are likely to be even more
stringent.
• A number of large water bodies are exempt from the Permit flow control requirements. Ecology
exempted these water bodies based on a WSDOT study, which showed that stormwater runoff was
unlikely to cause accelerated channel erosion in these large water bodies.
• The Green River is similar to many of the other rivers listed by Ecology as exempt from the flow control-
requirement.
• The Permit allows local governments to modify the “standard” flow control requirements where
watershed-scale studies show that the standard requirements are not appropriate (e.g., streams with
very flat gradients).Lower Mill Creek is a good candidate for modified flow control requirements due to
its low-gradient channel, stable channel characteristics, and unique geologic conditions.
• The City retained Brown and Caldwell (BC) to evaluate whether the Green River through Auburn meets
the same criteria that Ecology used to exempt similar water courses. The City requested that BC also
review existing data and information for the Mill Creek basin, conduct a preliminary assessment
regarding the appropriateness of modified flow control requirements for areas of the basin, and
develop a preliminary outline for a basin planning effort.
Green River: Direct Discharge Exemption
Ecology’s list of flow control-exempt surface waters is based on a study completed by WSDOT in 20042.
The WSDOT study suggests that areas can be exempted from flow control requirements when discharging
directly to a watercourse that meets the following criteria:
• The upstream drainage basin is significantly large: greater than 100 square miles.
• The full build-out land use change is relatively small as measured by a Land Cover Change (LCC) factor,
where the calculated LCC value is less than 55.4.
BC applied the WSDOT (2004) analytical methods and criteria to the Green River. Drainage areas and LCC
values were calculated for Green River drainage basins at the most upstream point where the river crosses
the city boundary (Location 1) and the most downstream point where the river crosses the city boundary
(Location 2). The results are shown in Figure 1 (attached) and are summarized as follows:
The drainage area at Location 1 was estimated to be 319 square miles, and the LCC value was
estimated to be 8.6.
DI.F
Recommendations for Green River and Mill Creek Direct Discharge Exemption/Modification
2
Page2 DRAFT – PDFConvert.2779.1.Mill_Creek_Flow_Control.docx
The drainage area at Location 2 was estimated to be 412 square miles, and the LCC value was
estimated to be 40.9.
At both locations, the drainage areas are greater than 100 square miles and the LCC values are less than
55.4. These results suggest that the reach of the Green River through Auburn can be exempted from the
flow control requirement, based on the methodology and criteria used in the 2004 WSDOT study. However
Ecology Staff determined that this method does not provide enough detail to allow granting a flow control
exemption on the Green River.
Mill Creek: Basin-specific Flow Control Standards
Ecology has not published detailed guidance for this type of basin planning. However, there are several
relevant sources available to help guide the approach and scope of our study3, 4, 5, 6. BC reviewed existing
data, reports, and documentation for Mill Creek to evaluate whether (1) the basin appears to be a good
candidate for basin-specific flow control requirements, and (2) existing information would be sufficient for
completing a basin plan that would be accepted by Ecology. BC’s review indicated that:
• The upper and lower portions of the Mill Creek basin exhibit distinctly different characteristics and will
likely require different stormwater management strategies (see Figure 2, attached).
• The existing data suggest that flow control appears to be appropriate in the upper portion of the basin
where slopes are steeper and there is potential for channel erosion and channel instability. Flow control
in the upper basin could help avoid channel erosion in the reaches of Mill Creek and reduce sediment
loads to the lower reaches of the creek
• Conversely, flow control in the lower Mill Creek basin might not reduce erosion or improve channel
stability. The lower channel is very flat and channel erosion does not appear to be a concern. Rather,
sediment deposition is the primary concern in the lower portion of the Mill Creek basin. In addition, to
causing channel aggradation, the inflow of sediments to the lower reaches of Mill Creek could also be
contributing to water quality concerns such as low dissolved oxygen.
Given the above findings, BC recommends that the City conduct a basin planning effort to develop basin-
specific flow control criteria for the Mill Creek basin. The following is a preliminary outline for a Mill Creek
Basin Plan. This outline reflects our current understanding of what would be required by Ecology to accept
basin-specific flow control standards.
1. Introduction
1.1. Problem
Provide a brief overview of the flow control issue and the potential effects on future development.
1.2. Goals and Objectives
Define clear goals and specific objectives for the study. These should focus on meeting the intent of NPDES
Stormwater Permit through projects and design standards that are tailored to the specific conditions of the
Mill Creek Basin.
1.3. Report Organization
2. Background
2.1. Stormwater Regulations
Cite and describe current regulations and City design standards. Describe expected changes in next Phase II
Permit.
2.2. Flow Control and Stream Stability
Explain how the current flow control regulations/standards relate to stream stability, water quality, and
aquatic habitat. Provide a general description of how development can affect stream geomorphology.
DI.F
Recommendations for Green River and Mill Creek Direct Discharge Exemption/Modification
3
Page3 DRAFT – PDFConvert.2779.1.Mill_Creek_Flow_Control.docx
2.3. Review of Current and Previous Studies
Provide a brief overview of previous and concurrent studies and describe how the relate to this basin
planning effort.
3. Stakeholder Involvement
The Mill Creek basin covers areas of King County, and Cities of Auburn, Kent, Algona, and Federal Way. Therefore,
the planning effort will need to coordinate with those jurisdictions in addition to any other relevant local
stakeholders.
4. Technical Evaluations
4.1. Known Water Quality Concerns
Using current studies and available data, identify and describe current water quality concerns within the Mill
Creek basin. Relate these concerns to the designated uses for Mill Creek and tributaries. Summarize current
and future activities likely to impact water quality. Based on our preliminary investigations, we expect this
will show that channel erosion is a concern in the upper portion of the basin, but not in the lower. Chief
concerns in the lower portion of the basin are fine sediment accumulation, low dissolved oxygen, and
temperature.
4.2. Historical and Future Development Conditions
Characterize historical watershed conditions and past development history based on previous studies,
geologic investigations, aerial photographs, etc. Use current zoning information and planning documents to
describe future land use conditions.
4.3. Field Investigations and Geomorphic Assessment
Conduct stream walks to visually assess the current conditions of Mill Creek and major tributaries. This will
include reach by reach evaluations of stream shape and stability, vegetative condition, flow and water
surface conditions, and visual characterization of soils and sediments. Collect sediment samples from the
bed and banks for grain size testing. The results should show that sediment accumulation is the main issue
in the lower basin.
4.4. Hydrologic Analysis
Building on previous efforts (HSPF model from flood studies, MIKE URBAN model from Drainage Plan),
develop a hydrologic model of the Mill Creek Basin. Estimate the magnitude and duration of stream flows
under historical, existing and future conditions. Future conditions will consist of multiple scenarios with
various development standards in place.
4.5. Stream Stability Evaluation
Evaluate the stability of Mill Creek and tributaries under existing and future conditions. Analyze the hydraulic
conditions to determine if future changes in flow regime caused by development are likely to destabilize the
stream channel.
5. Determine Flow Control Strategies and Prepare Basin
The details of this task will be determined based on the previous outlined work tasks and discussions with
Ecology Staff.
1 Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). May 2010. Frequently Asked Questions: Water Quality Program, Implement-
ing the Flow Control Standard in Ecology’s Western Washington Municipal Stormwater Permits. Publication Number: 10-10-024
2 Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). April 2004. Discharge Of Stormwater to High Order Streams Determin-
ing Exempt Reaches. Prepared for Washington State Department of Transportation 310 Maple Park Avenue SE PO Box 7329, MS
329 Olympia, WA 98504-7329. Prepared by Herrera Environmental Consultants and Northwest Hydraulic Consultants.
http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/NR/rdonlyres/206A4E42-9151-4599-AC4A-
4CDC486EEDE9/0/SW_ExemptReachesEvaluation0404.pdf
3 Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). May 2010. Frequently Asked Questions: Water Quality Program, Implement-
ing the Flow Control Standard in Ecology’s Western Washington Municipal Stormwater Permits. Publication Number: 10-10-024
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/1010024.pdf
DI.F
Recommendations for Green River and Mill Creek Direct Discharge Exemption/Modification
4
Page4 DRAFT – PDFConvert.2779.1.Mill_Creek_Flow_Control.docx
4 Memorandum from December 18, 2009 titled: “Stormwater Design Manual Flow Control Area Standards – Determination of
Flow Control Mapping Areas.” From Mike Giseburt to Allen Quynn; prepared by R.W. Beck for the City of Renton.
5 Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. January 11, 2011. PCHB No. 10-013, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of
Law, And Order. Rosemere Neighborhood Association; Columbia Riverkeeper; and Northwest Environmental Defense Center
(Appellants) versus Washington State Department of Ecology, and Clark County (Respondents), Building Industry Association of
Clark County (Intervenor-Respondent).
6 Des Moines Creek Basin Committee: City of SeaTac, City of Des Moines, Port Of Seattle, and King County. November 1997. Des
Moines Creek Basin Plan.
DI.F
!!!∀#
∃% &∋&∋
(
)
(
!
∀
#
∃
%
!
∀#
#
∃
%
&
∗
∋+
!
&
#
&
,!
−.
∋
+
(
!
∋
#/
∋
0
∋
1
2
(
34
#
1#
DI.F
!∀
!#
∃
%&∋(
∀
∋∀
(∀
()#
#
(
!
∀
#
∃
%
&
∋
!
∀
#
∃
%
#
&
∋
(
)
∗
+
)
+
∗)
)
+
,
∗
+∗
!
+
!∃
+
∃
+
+
!∃
−
.∀
)
%
∗
(
∀∗
!
∗
!
!!
∃
/!∃
∗
∗.∀
)
%
)
(
∀∃/0 ))
∗
1
∃
∃
)
!!
∗
∃
)
2)
∗
DI.F
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Capital Project Status Report
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Capital Project Status Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached report.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.H
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.H
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
1
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
C
,
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
a
n
d
re
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
s
t
o
r
m
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
2,
8
0
1
,
2
0
0
2
,
8
0
1
,
2
0
0
2
,
3
7
5
,
1
0
0
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
0
9
9
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
h
a
n
g
e
or
d
e
r
w
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
re
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
S
C
A
D
A
.
2
CP
1
0
0
6
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
6
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
ne
w
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
s
e
r
v
i
n
g
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
Ar
e
a
o
n
F
r
a
n
c
i
s
C
t
.
S
E
3,
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
3,
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
6
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
M
a
r
-
1
1
9
9
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
P
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
3
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
B
,
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
s
e
w
e
r
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
.
3,
3
3
2
,
4
1
0
3,
3
3
2
,
4
1
0
2
,
7
4
5
,
4
3
7
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
8
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
an
d
p
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
A
c
h
a
n
g
e
o
r
d
e
r
is
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
r
e
g
a
r
d
i
n
g
SC
A
D
A
.
4
CP
1
0
0
5
So
u
t
h
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
P
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
co
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
o
n
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
Ma
i
n
S
t
t
o
3
r
d
S
t
S
E
/
S
W
.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
a
l
l
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
n
e
w
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
tr
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(E
D
A
)
4,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
s
)
7,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
6
,
3
8
9
,
7
5
2
1
0
0
%
M
a
r
-
1
1
9
2
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
P
a
v
e
r
s
ar
e
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
a
s
we
a
t
h
e
r
a
l
l
o
w
s
.
R
i
b
b
o
n
Cu
t
t
i
n
g
C
e
r
e
m
o
n
y
H
e
l
d
4/
1
2
a
n
d
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
o
p
e
n
e
d
.
5
CP
0
9
1
6
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
-
S
R
1
8
t
o
W
.
M
a
i
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
W
V
H
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
1
8
an
d
W
.
M
a
i
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
W
.
Ma
i
n
.
70
5
,
0
0
0
80
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
2
5
6
,
8
8
5
(T
I
B
G
r
a
n
t
)
83
,
7
1
0
(1
2
4
F
u
n
d
)
3,
8
4
5
,
5
9
5
3
,
8
4
5
,
5
9
5
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
1
9
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Wo
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
f
o
r
we
a
t
h
e
r
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
t
o
pa
v
i
n
g
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
n
o
t
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
A
p
r
i
l
o
r
Ma
y
.
6
C4
1
0
A
S.
2
7
7
t
h
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
M
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
we
t
l
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
.
2
7
7
t
h
G
r
a
d
e
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
No
r
t
h
g
e
o
d
e
c
k
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
4
4
t
h
St
N
W
a
n
d
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
R
o
a
d
.
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
t
o
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
1
0
y
e
a
r
s
.
10
2
,
4
0
0
10
2
,
4
0
0
1
1
6
,
4
0
0
1
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
1
9
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
g
a
i
n
.
7
CP
0
9
0
9
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
or
d
e
r
t
o
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
2,
9
8
0
,
0
0
0
2,
9
8
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
9
8
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
8
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
F
i
n
a
l
SC
A
D
A
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
de
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
o
n
t
h
e
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
8
C2
0
7
A
'A
'
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
pe
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
co
r
r
i
d
o
r
‘
A
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
f
r
o
m
1
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
s
o
u
t
h
to
3
r
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
.
1
,
2
0
2
,
5
4
5
(1
0
2
a
n
d
T
I
F
)
40
6
,
0
0
0
6
,
5
8
0
,
7
0
9
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
s
)
1,
2
8
5
,
1
7
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
In
-
K
i
n
d
)
43
0
,
8
5
5
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
9,
9
0
5
,
2
7
9
9
,
7
3
2
,
1
8
6
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
1
7
4
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
G
a
u
b
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
3r
d
t
o
5
t
h
i
s
o
p
e
n
t
o
l
o
c
a
l
tr
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
l
y
u
n
t
i
l
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
ro
a
d
w
a
y
g
r
a
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
t
h
e
no
r
t
h
e
r
n
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
9
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
re
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
a
c
a
d
e
m
y
d
r
i
v
e
Se
,
3
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
,
a
n
d
3
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
23
2
,
4
0
0
2
3
2
,
4
0
0
2
1
9
,
0
9
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
7
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
L
e
e
Wo
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
wa
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
w
o
r
k
o
n
3
7
t
h
St
r
e
e
t
.
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
6
DI.H
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
10
C5
2
4
A
SC
A
D
A
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
S
C
A
D
A
s
y
s
t
e
m
to
m
e
e
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
g
o
a
l
s
.
2,
6
6
6
,
2
0
0
1
,
9
9
4
,
5
0
0
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
5
,
6
7
4
,
7
0
0
4
,
9
9
8
,
5
1
2
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
0
9
4
5
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
L
e
e
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
.
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
De
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
ar
e
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
a
t
M
&
O
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
i
n
l
a
t
e
Ap
r
i
l
.
11
CP
1
1
1
6
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
t
e
a
l
l
i
g
h
t
s
th
a
t
h
a
v
e
r
e
a
c
h
e
d
t
h
e
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
i
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
l
i
f
e
wi
t
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
)
48
5
,
0
0
0
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
1
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
Wo
r
k
b
e
g
a
n
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
Ap
r
i
l
9
t
h
.
12
C2
0
1
A
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
(
G
r
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
d
e
s
e
p
a
r
a
t
e
‘M
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
B
u
r
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
a
n
t
a
Fe
S
t
a
m
p
e
d
e
P
a
s
s
R
a
i
l
l
i
n
e
i
n
P
h
a
s
e
1
a
n
d
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
B
l
a
c
k
D
i
a
m
o
n
d
R
o
a
d
By
p
a
s
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
f
u
t
u
r
e
p
h
a
s
e
.
5,
1
6
6
,
5
6
0
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
8
7
2
,
3
7
2
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
)
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
M
S
I
B
)
2,
8
5
6
,
6
1
1
(T
I
B
)
1,
3
3
5
,
0
7
9
(K
i
n
g
C
t
y
)
1,
5
4
2
,
8
0
0
(P
o
r
t
s
)
47
8
,
0
0
0
(B
N
S
F
)
1,
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
(R
E
E
T
2
)
2,
7
7
2
,
7
5
2
(P
W
T
F
)
22
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
2
2
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
1
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
o
a
d
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
t
o
be
g
i
n
A
p
r
i
l
1
6
t
h
a
n
d
co
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
20
1
3
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
13
CP
1
1
0
3
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
I
n
t
e
r
t
i
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
o
n
1
3
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
a
n
d
t
h
e
T
a
c
o
m
a
Pi
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
pu
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
.
1,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
7
5
,
6
3
8
1
0
0
%
F
e
b
-
1
2
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pr
e
-
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
he
l
d
a
n
d
n
o
t
i
c
e
t
o
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
i
s
s
u
e
d
t
h
e
we
e
k
o
f
A
p
r
i
l
1
6
t
h
.
14
CP
0
9
2
1
Bi
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
&
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
s
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
se
w
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
m
a
n
h
o
l
e
s
,
p
i
p
e
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
0
3
5
,
6
3
3
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
9
5
,
6
3
3
1
,
0
5
3
,
1
0
9
9
9
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
N
o
v
-
1
2
L
e
e
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
.
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
me
e
t
i
n
g
h
e
l
d
1
1
/
2
9
.
A
l
l
ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
.
15
CP
0
9
0
9
Ac
a
d
e
m
y
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
st
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
to
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
1
3
,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3
,
0
2
2
,
5
0
0
9
5
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
A
p
r
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Bi
d
D
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
fi
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
;
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
d
e
s
i
g
n
de
l
a
y
s
d
u
e
t
o
co
m
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
o
b
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
an
e
a
s
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
l
i
n
e
s
wh
i
c
h
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
de
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
.
16
CP
1
1
1
2
20
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
of
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
t
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
18
0
,
0
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
6
DI.H
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
17
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
T
r
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Li
n
e
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
a
l
a
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
an
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
S
i
t
e
t
o
th
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
ac
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
W
e
l
l
1
.
T
h
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
l
i
n
e
o
n
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
1
,
4
2
4
,
0
0
0
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
1
,
6
7
4
,
0
0
0
5
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
un
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
su
m
m
e
r
2
0
1
2
t
o
t
a
k
e
ad
v
a
n
t
a
g
e
o
f
t
h
e
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
cl
o
s
u
r
e
.
18
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
H
i
-
C
r
e
s
t
D
r
i
v
e
N
W
1
16
5
,
0
0
0
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
1
7
8
,
3
1
0
3
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
O
c
t
-
1
2
L
e
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
19
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
W
e
l
l
R
e
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
W
e
l
l
1
s
o
th
a
t
i
t
c
a
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
t
f
u
l
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
mo
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
Co
n
t
r
o
l
F
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
1
1
,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1
,
4
8
4
,
9
4
4
1
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
un
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
2
0
1
3
.
20
CP
1
1
0
7
Fu
l
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
T
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
ph
a
s
e
1
A
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
F
u
l
m
e
r
We
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
a
r
e
a
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
an
d
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
t
h
e
f
u
l
l
w
a
t
e
r
ri
g
h
t
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
1
B
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
te
s
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
s
w
e
l
l
a
s
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
2
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
9
7
,
3
6
4
1
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
L
a
m
o
t
h
e
Th
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
fo
r
t
h
e
P
h
a
s
e
1
A
o
n
l
y
a
n
d
wi
l
l
b
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
i
s
ph
a
s
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
ex
e
c
u
t
e
d
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
21
CP
1
2
0
6
20
1
2
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
,
a
n
d
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
p
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
ch
i
p
s
e
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
w
o
r
k
o
n
b
o
t
h
ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
th
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
(S
O
S
)
1,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
s
t
h
e
re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
2
0
1
2
S
O
S
n
o
n
-
re
b
u
i
l
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
20
1
2
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
22
CP
1
1
2
0
Le
a
H
i
l
l
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
sa
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
H
a
z
e
l
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
.
,
L
e
a
Hi
l
l
e
l
e
m
.
,
a
n
d
R
a
i
n
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
l
o
n
g
11
6
t
h
A
v
e
.
S
E
a
n
d
S
E
3
1
2
S
t
.
,
1
3
9
8
,
5
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
21
,
5
9
7
(A
S
D
)
42
0
,
0
9
7
4
2
0
,
0
9
7
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
Gr
a
n
t
O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
3
t
o
b
e
du
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
u
m
m
e
r
.
23
CP
1
1
1
8
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
t
o
F
i
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
sy
s
t
e
m
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
i
s
l
a
n
d
,
a
de
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
m
i
d
-
0
b
l
o
c
k
c
r
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
,
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
of
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
p
o
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
th
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
T
h
i
s
pr
o
j
e
c
t
a
l
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
1
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
4
0
,
8
3
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
94
0
,
8
6
0
9
4
0
,
8
6
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Gr
a
n
t
O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
Ne
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
co
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
C
P
1
1
1
9
.
24
CP
1
1
1
9
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
F
i
r
S
t
.
S
E
t
o
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
SE
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
w
i
d
e
n
A
W
S
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
F
i
r
a
n
d
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
r
o
m
3
l
a
n
e
s
t
o
5
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
in
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
s
t
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
e
w
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
1
2
,
4
2
6
,
4
0
0
(T
I
B
)
60
6
,
6
0
0
(M
I
T
)
3,
0
3
3
,
0
0
0
3
,
0
3
3
,
0
0
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
N
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
c
o
n
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
CP
1
1
1
8
.
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
6
DI.H
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
To
t
a
l
Gr
o
u
p
Ar
t
.
S
t
.
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
-
3
)
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
25
CP
1
1
0
8
20
1
1
/
1
2
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
o
n
d
C
l
e
a
n
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
o
f
se
d
i
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
8
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
p
o
n
d
s
lo
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
t
h
e
di
t
c
h
a
l
o
n
g
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
/
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
.
2
41
7
,
6
0
0
4
1
7
,
6
0
0
4
1
7
,
6
0
0
9
8
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
S
e
p
-
1
2
L
e
e
Co
n
t
r
a
c
t
d
o
c
u
m
e
n
t
s
a
r
e
be
i
n
g
f
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
.
26
CP
0
7
6
5
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
th
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
a
n
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
2
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
5
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
co
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
6
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
.
27
CP
1
0
2
4
AW
S
a
n
d
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
co
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
2
7
5
,
0
0
0
75
,
0
0
0
9
7
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
%
Ju
n
-
1
2
Pr
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
On
l
y
TB
D
T
r
u
o
n
g
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
In
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
pr
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
f
o
r
ea
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
AW
S
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
o
n
t
o
M
S
t
.
S
E
(C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
17
t
h
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
e
f
t
tu
r
n
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
r
o
m
1
7
t
h
t
o
M.
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
P
r
e
-
De
s
i
g
n
-
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
ul
t
i
m
a
t
e
c
o
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
fo
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
i
n
g
t
h
e
we
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
A
W
S
t
o
no
r
t
h
b
o
u
n
d
M
S
t
.
S
E
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
mo
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
c
o
n
t
r
o
l
,
an
d
b
i
k
e
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
A
W
S
.
C
o
s
t
s
b
e
i
n
g
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
b
a
s
e
d
o
n
P
W
C
pr
e
f
e
r
r
e
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
.
28
CP
0
9
0
6
20
0
9
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
g
a
t
e
w
a
y
s
i
g
n
a
t
Ea
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
a
n
d
L
a
k
e
T
a
p
p
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
3
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
F
u
n
d
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
L
e
e
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
o
n
h
o
l
d
.
29
CP
0
6
2
4
We
l
l
5
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
w
e
l
l
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
a
n
d
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
ca
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
3
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
75
1
,
9
0
0
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
0
%
J
a
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
c
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
30
C5
1
2
A
We
l
l
4
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
h
o
u
s
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
b
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
re
s
t
r
o
o
m
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
s
t
a
f
f
.
3
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
63
0
,
0
0
0
6
3
0
,
0
0
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
J
u
l
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
s
c
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
31
C2
2
9
A
BN
S
F
/
E
V
H
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
U
n
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
b
o
t
h
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
(
A
S
t
SE
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
N
S
F
r
a
i
l
t
r
a
c
k
s
j
u
s
t
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
Wh
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
.
3
3
8
5
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
38
5
,
0
0
0
9
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
n
h
o
l
d
pe
n
d
i
n
g
B
N
S
F
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
de
s
i
g
n
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
pe
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
,
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
T
O
T
A
L
8
,
8
31
,
5
0
5
2
0
,
5
5
4
,
0
7
5
6
,
3
6
2
,
5
4
3
5
,
7
4
0
,
2
0
0
4
0
,
3
9
9
,
7
7
9
8
1
,
8
8
8
,
1
0
2
8
6
,
3
3
5
,
5
6
8
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
6
DI.H
Da
t
e
:
A
p
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
To
t
a
l
SO
S
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Ot
h
e
r
To
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
N
o
.
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
(1
0
3
)
(4
3
0
)
(4
3
1
)
(4
3
2
)
Fu
n
d
s
Bu
d
g
e
t
Co
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
20
1
1
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
32
CP
1
1
0
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
Ph
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
pa
t
c
h
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
o
f
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
a
n
d
a
s
p
h
a
l
t
st
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
9
3
,3
4
9
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
1
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
33
CP
1
1
2
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
Ph
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
a
n
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
2
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
6
t
h
P
l
N
E
o
f
f
o
f
6
t
h
S
t
,
2
n
d
S
t
.
NE
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
R
S
t
a
n
d
O
S
t
,
H
S
t
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
n
d
St
.
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
,
a
n
d
G
/
3
r
d
S
t
S
W
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
i
n
an
d
E
S
t
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
0
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
1
,
9
6
8
,
3
0
7
1
,
5
2
6
,
6
2
1
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
1
2
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
t
t
h
e
2
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
NW
a
n
d
o
n
3
r
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
2,
8
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
3
,
7
6
8
,
3
0
7
3
,
0
1
9
,
9
7
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
20
1
2
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
34
CP
1
2
0
1
20
1
2
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
d
e
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
J
S
t
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
n
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
2
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
n
d
R
S
t
.
S
E
2
7
t
h
/
H
/
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
E
a
s
t
o
f
F
S
t
.
S
E
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
m
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
b
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
2
,
0
1
8
,
5
0
0
2
,
7
8
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Ot
h
e
r
S
O
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
CP
1
2
0
6
,
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
Ov
e
r
l
a
y
s
20
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
F
o
r
s
t
a
t
u
s
s
e
e
C
P
1
2
0
6
2,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
2
,
2
1
8
,
5
0
0
2
,
9
8
0
,
0
0
0
T
O
T
A
L
S
O
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
2
0
1
1
&
2
0
1
2
4
,
8
2
1
,
0
0
0
4
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
5
4
3
,
9
0
0
-
5
,
9
8
6
,
8
0
7
5
,
9
9
9
,
9
7
0
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
20
1
1
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
:
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
.
20
1
1
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
SO
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
:
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
o
m
b
i
n
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
s
.
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
6
DI.H
Da
t
e
:
Ap
r
i
l
1
1
,
2
0
1
2
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
De
s
i
g
n
Ad
v
.
Co
n
s
t
.
Fi
n
i
s
h
St
a
f
f
Ac
t
i
o
n
No
.
Pr
o
j
.
#
Lo
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Bu
d
g
e
t
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
C
o
s
t
%
Da
t
e
%
Da
t
e
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
St
a
t
u
s
A
MS
1
1
1
0
Ja
c
o
b
s
e
n
T
r
e
e
F
a
r
m
a
n
d
F
i
e
l
d
s
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
De
m
o
l
i
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
d
e
m
o
l
i
s
h
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
Ja
c
o
b
s
e
n
T
r
e
e
F
a
r
m
a
n
d
o
n
t
h
e
F
i
e
l
d
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
.
14
2
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
3
,
2
6
7
$
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
1
9
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
M
S
C
Wo
r
k
o
n
t
h
e
c
h
a
n
g
e
o
r
d
e
r
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
B
CP
1
1
1
5
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
N
W
P
l
a
z
a
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
t
h
e
N
W
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
s
i
m
i
l
ar
t
o
th
e
r
e
c
e
n
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
s
o
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
.
W
o
r
k
w
il
l
in
c
l
u
d
e
n
e
w
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
A
D
A
R
a
m
p
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
an
d
n
e
w
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
47
5
,
9
7
7
$
4
5
8
,
5
7
0
$
9
9
%
M
a
r
-
1
2
J
u
l
-
1
2
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
l
y
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
a
y
b
e
p
u
t
o
n
ho
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
Te
n
t
P
r
o
p
o
s
a
l
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
.
C
CP
0
6
1
6
Wa
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
-
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
st
r
i
a
n
Ki
o
s
k
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
u
p
t
o
9
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
91
,
0
0
0
$
1
1
6
,
0
5
0
$
1
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
D
e
c
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
i
s
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
an
d
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
D
CP
1
0
1
6
Fe
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
n
e
w
l
e
v
e
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
F
e
n
s
t
e
r
Le
v
e
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
.
63
9
,
1
0
0
$
1
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
$
6
0
%
N
/
A
D
e
c
-
1
3
A
n
d
e
r
s
e
n
P
C
D
C
Wo
r
k
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
K
i
n
g
Co
u
n
t
y
.
F
u
n
d
i
n
g
i
s
f
r
o
m
3
G
r
a
n
t
s
an
d
m
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
f
u
n
d
s
.
W
R
I
A
9
E
c
o
s
y
s
t
e
m
F
o
r
u
m
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
$
3
0
0
K
i
n
W
R
I
A
9
/
K
C
D
fu
n
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
;
ho
w
e
v
e
r
,
a
r
e
c
e
n
t
s
t
a
t
e
s
u
p
r
e
m
e
co
u
r
t
d
e
c
i
s
i
o
n
(
C
a
r
y
v
.
M
a
s
o
n
Co
u
n
t
y
)
h
a
s
i
n
v
a
l
i
d
a
t
e
d
t
h
e
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
me
t
h
o
d
o
l
o
g
y
f
o
r
K
C
D
’
s
2
0
1
2
fu
n
d
s
,
t
h
u
s
t
h
e
$
3
0
0
K
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
by
W
R
I
A
9
i
s
n
o
l
o
n
g
e
r
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
fo
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
i
s
wo
r
k
i
n
g
n
o
w
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
o
t
h
e
r
fu
n
d
i
n
g
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
Pr
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
E
MS
0
8
0
2
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
R
o
o
f
E
l
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
i
c
C
o
a
t
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
o
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
b
u
i
l
d
in
g
s
a
s
ne
e
d
e
d
.
22
0
,
0
0
0
$
2
2
0
,
0
0
0
$
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
2
B
u
r
k
e
M
S
C
Or
i
g
i
n
a
l
R
e
-
R
o
o
f
B
i
d
s
w
e
r
e
re
j
e
c
t
e
d
b
e
c
a
u
s
e
t
h
e
y
w
e
r
e
5
0
%
ov
e
r
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
wi
l
l
b
e
r
e
-
p
a
c
k
a
g
e
d
a
n
d
b
i
d
i
n
t
h
e
Sp
r
i
n
g
o
f
2
0
1
2
u
s
i
n
g
a
n
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
t
o
a
f
u
l
l
r
o
o
f
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
a
n
el
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
i
c
c
o
a
t
i
n
g
.
OT
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
-
A
C
T
I
O
N
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
C
O
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
S
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
6
DI.H
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Activities Matrix
Date:
April 10, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Public Works Committee Activities
Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached matrix.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:April 16, 2012 Item Number:DI.I
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.I
No
.
It
e
m
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Ne
x
t
PW
C
Re
v
i
e
w
Da
t
e
Es
t
.
Co
m
p
.
Da
t
e
S
t
a
t
u
s
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
D
o
w
d
y
M
a
y