HomeMy WebLinkAbout6394 Exhibit C Exhibit C
The Aubum, Dieringer, Federal Way and Kenf School Districf
Capital Facilities Plans, ,
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan,
Amendments to the City of Aubum Comprehensive
Transportation Plan,
Amendments to the City otAuburn Comprehensive Stormwafer
Drainage Plan,
Amendmenfs to the NortheastAuburn/Robertson Properties
Special Area Plan,
and various amendments to the chapters of fhe Aubum
Comprehensive Plan including:
* Chapter 3, Land Use;: .
* Chapter 4, Housing;
* Chapter 8, Economic Development;
* Chapter 9, The Environment;
* Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map; and
* Appendix B
(See "Comp. Plan Policv/Texf Amendments"tab in the working binder)
Ordinance No. 6394
November29, 2011
Page 10
• • • � • • 1 :
1 � � 1
� �
� � • �
�� I�� :�,
`� -- - ,� 'I:!'1. , ., ..
��� �� : � _ ,■ .
;�__-
��, � � . =
,
, � �, � ,
r y
� I �,�
.� �
�L .
�
�'--
j��':!h ' �1\ . a
,` . �r --cvcr 1 ... ,
r� - �.� "�'. . ' -: ,� �
� ��,-",�,I�i � , ._ � ; .
,
. . ir ��.�� iit �n.� ? �r� �
4 � � -.��.'.�:` �:> i . o. -,'u : �
x�- � ���:� t! � J� ���..�. � ,,�Y� �i�M � _ijf .
�- - - °C V � . �
� • � � - � � • • • � : � . � • � - •
�V � 1J14_ N � .
� §CHOOL DISTRICT �
ENGAGE - EDUCATE - EMPOWER
915 Fourth SVeet NE
Aubum, Washington 98002
(253) 931-4900
Serving Stutlents in:
Unincorporated King County
City of-Aubum
City of Algona
City of Kent
Gity of Pacific
City of Black Diamond
BOARD ofi DIREGTORS
Carol Helgerson
� Lisa Conners
Craig Schumaker
Ray Vefik
Janice Nelson
Dr. Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent
Table of Contents .
Section I Executive Summary ........................Page 1 '
. Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6
Section III Standard of Service........................ Page 8
Section IV Inventory of Facilities...................... Page 15
Section V Pupil Capacity......_.._..................... Page 18
Section VI Capital Construction Plan.................Page 21
Section VIF Impact Fees..............._.._............... Page 25
Section VIII App_endices..............._...,:........,..,.. Page 29
Appendix A.1 -Student EnrollmentProjedions Page 30
Appendix A;2-Capital Facilities_Flan Projections Page 44
Appendix A.3-Stuiient Generation Survey Page 49
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section I
Executive Summary
Aubum School Disfict No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 through 2017
I. Executive Summary
ThisBix-Year Capital Facilities Plan(the"Plan") has been prepared by the Aubum School Distrid
(the"DfsMct")as the DistrioYspdnoipalplanning dooument; in wmpliance with the requirements
of Washington's Growth Management Abt and the adopted ordinancesof the counties and cities
served hy the District. This plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2011..
This Plan is consisterrt with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted:by the District
However,this Plan is not irdended to b_e the sole plan forall of the DistricYs rieeds. The Distrid
may prepare irrterim and periodic long-range Capital Faulities.Plans consistent with Buard
Policiesand actions,taking iMo accouM a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and
trends in the use of faalities;and otherneeds of the.Distrid as may be required However;any
such plan or plans will be consisterrt with this Six-Yean Capital FacilitiesPlan.
To enable the coAection of impaet fees in the unincorporated areas of King Gounty and within the
City of Autium and City of Kent;the'King CouMy Coundl,the City of Aubum and the Ciry of KeM
will adapt this Plan.by referenee as part of each jurisdiction's respective cortiprehensive pfan. To
enable the collection of impacffees in Me Cities of Algona, Pacific and Bladc Diamond,these
_
munidpalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requiremeMs of the Grou+th Management Aet and the local ordinances,the P�an
will be updated on an annual basis,and any changes in the fae schedule(s)adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes the DistrieYs"standard of service°in order to ascertain the DisNicfs current
and future oapaciry, While the State Superintendern of Publiclnstruction establishes square
footage guidelines foc capaciry,those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of
the DistriG. The Growth Management Act and 4he schooi impact fee ordinance authorize the
Distrid to define its standard of service based on the DistricPsspecific needs. In ganerel,the
Disfict's ciirrent standard provides that Gass size fdr grades K-2 shouldnot exceed25 studeMS;
Uass size for grades 3-4 shnuld nqt,exceed 27 swdeMS; Gass:size fo�grade 5 should not exceed
30 students. When averaged wer the six alemeMary grades,this compu[es to 26.5 studeMs per
Gassroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed'30 students,urith some subject areas
restrided to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more speeifle infortnation.)
The ppacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the
existlng InveMOry of faciiities inGuding transitional Gassrooms. The District's2010-�1 capacity
was 13,725 whereas Full Time Equivalent("FTE")enrollment for this same period was 13,812.45
(includes FuII Day Kindergarten): The adual number of individual studer�ts was 14,482 as of
Odober 1,2010. (See Section V for more specific infortnation.)
The capital wnstruction plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed
modemization to the Distrid's existing facilities. This provided for a new high school approved by
the votere in February 2003 anii opened.in September2005;and the addition of two new
elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005;with Lakeland Hills Elementary
opening in the Fall of 2U06_and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The
plan inGudes the construction_oi a new middle school and a ngw elementary school,as well as
_
the acquisitlon of future school sites to accommodate growth: The new facilities are required to
meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development
areas within the AubumSchoolDistrict.Three areas that tiave significant impad on the school
2
district are the Lakeland South,the Lea Hill,and thenorth Aubum valley.areas of the dishict.
There are other pockets of development that impadihe District as well. The City of KeM has an
area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downtum
has slowed developmenYin these areaa
The disVipt comPleted,a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008 a
Steering Committee made recommendations to the board for ppital improvemeMs to existing
facilities and replaeement of seven schools over thenext ten years.These recommendations led
to a capital improvemerrts levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in Maroh.2009.
Both ballot measures were not successiuf in March.The board detertnined to re-?un only the
_. _ . . . _ _ .
ppital improvements levy in November 2009,which the wters approved.
The ScFiool Impad Fee Ordinances adopted by King County,the Cily of Aubum and the City of
Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fscal impad
. _. . _ _
incurred bya Dishid experiencing growth and development. Sedion Vll sets forth the proposed
school impad fees far single famiiy and multFfamily dwelling units. The student generation
fadors have tieen generated using the studerrts wtio adually attend school in the Aubum Scliool
District from single Tamity and multi-family developmeMS constructed in the last five years. The
_ _ _ � - - -
method of colleding the data iswlth the use af GIS mapping soflware,data from King County and
Pierce County GIS, and to integrate the mapping wRh student data from the district's student data .
system. Thismethod gives t9ie Distrid adual student generation numbers for each grade span
for identified deyeloqments. This data is wntained in Appendix A.3.
3
nunur�srnooi o�sma No.aoe
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
zm�mro„gn mt�
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CHANGES FROM 2070 TO 2011
Listed below is a summary le4el outline of the changes from tFie2010 Capital
Facilkies Plan that are a part of ttie 2011 Plan. The chaiiges are noted by Section
for ease of reference.
nl
Executive Summary
A. Updated to reflect new infortnation uvithin the Pian.
B. Summary level list of changes from previous year.
Sectlon II
Enrollment Projections
Updateii projections. See Appendices A.1 8 A.2.
' n III
Standard of Service
A. Increase oi 1 adaptive behavior classroom at high school level
B. Redudion of 1 adaptive behavior room ffi elemeMary level
Section IV
Inverrtory of Faciiities
No change,from 2010-11 to 2011-12. ,
' nV
Pupil Capacity
No change from 2010-11 to 2011-12.
4
Aubum School DfstriG No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2ot1 mrougn 2Ct7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Seetion VII
Impact Fees CHANGES TO/MPACT FEEDATA ELEMENTS 2010 ro 2011
CPF CPF
DATA ELEMENTS 2010 2011 EXPLANATION
Student Generatlon Faetors
SingleFamily Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621,
Elementary 0.3080 0.3130 Student Generation Factors are calculated "
Mid School 0.1470 0.1540 by the school distrid based on district
Sr. High 0.1770 0.'1650 records ofaverage actuafstuderrt generation
MuIH-Family rates for new developments construeted
Elementary 0.0880 0.1240 over the last five years.
Mid SChool 0.0380 0.0560
Sr. High 0.0310 0.5190 •
School Constructfon Costs
Elementary $21,750,000 $21,750,000
Middle School $42,500,000 $42,SD0,000
Site Acquisition Costs
Cost per aae $290,381 $290,381 Updated estimates on land costs
Area CostAlloxraneeeoaucn inaex $18D.1Z $18D.1T Updated to projected SPI schedule.
Mateh°h-State 60.23°k 58.67% Updated to currentSPl schedule.
Match°k-Distriet 39.77% 41:33% Computed
DlsVlct Averege AV
• Single Family $254,009 $248,795 Updated from March 2011 King County
Dept of Assessments data.
Muki-Famity $76,573 $67,821 Updated from March 2011 King County
Dept of Assessments data using weighted
average.
Debt Serv Tau Rate 50.82 $0.93 CurreM Fiscal Year
GO Bondlnt Rate 4.33�d 4.91% CurreM Rate(Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-11)
Seetion Vlll
Apperidiees
Appendix A.1 - Updated enrallment prajections from Octoberl,2010
Appendix A2-Updated enrollment projections with eMicipated buildout schedule.
Appendix A.3-StudeM Generation Survey March 2011
5
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section II
Enroliment Projections
i
Aubum School Distric[No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
zo��m�an son
ENROLLMENTPROJECTIONS
The Aubum School:Disfict uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all
of the DistricYs operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in
Appendix A.2 tiUed"CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shpws the
anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the
assumptions set farth in the comprehensiye projections,Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional
stuiients generated from new developments in the distrid as shown in Appendix A.2.
7ABLE ASD ENROLLMENT
_ I1.1 PROJECTIONS Mareh 2010
� .201at1 � 2011-12 2012-13 :2013-14� 201415 � 2015-16 201617
GRADE Actuaf Pro eded Pro ected Pro ected Pro'ected Pro ected Pro'ected .
� KDG 1010 1027 1047 1069 1095 1123 1148
� 1 1066 1056 1077 1099 1125 1153 1179
2 101fi 1081 1074 1095 1122 1150 1176
3 1013 1038 1105 1100 1127 1155 1180
4 1024 1055 1082 1152 1152 1180 1206
� 5 1079 1049 1083 1113 1187 1189 1215
K-5 6208 6305 8468 . 6627 6809 6949 7104
6 1041 1086 1059 1094 1129 1204 1203
7 1060 1065 1113 1088 1128 1164 1238
8 1172 1080 1088 1136 1118 1160 1194
6-8 3213 3231 3260 3320 3375 3529 3635
9 1221 1336 1310 1322 1380 1366 1409
10 1238 1237 1356 1332 1351 1411 1394
11 1258 1209 1212 1333 1314 1334 1391
� 12 1344 1267 1222 1226 1353 9336 1352
�9"?:12 5061 5050 �5100 5213 5398 5446 - . 5546--_
��TOTALS � 74,482 14;586 14,828 15,160 15;582 15,924 - -16;286 -- .
GRADES"K-12 Actual Pro'ected Pro'eded Pro'eded Pro'ected Pro'eded Pro'eded
K-5 w/K @ 1/2 5703 5792 5945 6093 6261 6388 —6530
6-8 3213 3231 3260 3320 3375 3529 3635
9-12 5061 5050 5100 5213 5398 5446 554fi _
K-12 w!K 1/2 13 9Z7. 1 072 14 304 14 626 15 034 15 362._ " 15 711
Note:The disVid is currendy opera6ng Full Day Kindergarten in eight schools and includes two state
funded Full Day Kindergartens at Mro addftional elementary schools.
7
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 thraugh 2017
Section III
Standard of Service
Aubum Schooi DISViR No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
zo�t m�o�m m�
STANDARD OF SERVICE
The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King Courrty, the City of Au6um and the Ciry of Kent indicate
that each school distrtct must esta6lish a "Standaml of Service"in order to asceRain the overall capacity to house
its projected student population. The Supenntendent oiPublic Mstroction establishes square;footage •
"capabity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPl guidelines, '
is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school conshuction projects. By defautt
these guidelines have been used to benchmark the distncPs capacity to house its student population. The SPI
guidelines donot make adequate pr�vision forlocal distnd program needs, facility configurations, emeiging
educational reform, or the dynamics of each studenPs educationa!program. Ths Aubum Schaol DisUict Standard
of Service addresses those local cronsiderations that 2quire space in excess of the SP/guidelines. The eHect
on the space reyuirements for both permanent and re/ocatab/e facilities is shown below for each grade aRiculation
pattem. Conditions that may iasuR in potential space needs are provided for information pwposes without
accompanying computations.
OVERVIEW
The Aubum School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,208 students in grades
K through 5. For Kindergarten students;665 of the 1,010 attend 1/2 days throughout the year and 5,198 studerrts,
grades 1 through 5, plus 345 kindergartners,attend on a full day basis. When converted to full time
eguivalerrts,the K-5 enrollment is 5,797.The four middle schools house 3,213 students in grades 6 through,8.
The DisVict operates three comprehensive senior high schoals and one alternative high school, housing 5,061
students in grades 9 through 12.
CLASS S1ZE
The number of pupils per Gassroom determines the number of dassrooms required to house the
student population: Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subjed to collective
bargaining. Changesto class size agreements can have significant impact on available space.
The current pupilfteacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 studeMs per
teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 students per room at grades
K-5. At grades 6- 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPl space allocation for each gtade
articulation level, less fhe computed reduction for the Aubum School District Standard of Service,
detertnines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown
below by grade articulation level.
ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS
STRUCTURED LEARN/NG FOR DEVELOPMENTALLYDISABLED SPEGAL EOUCAT/ON
The Aubum SchoofDistrict operetes a structured leaming program for students witfi moderete to severe
disabilitiesat the elementary sdiool leyel which currently uses ten classrooms to provide for 105'students.
The housingreguirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilitiesgrows at a disproportionate rate compared to
total elementary population.
ADAPTNE BEHAVIOR
The Aubum School 0istrict operates an adaptive hehavior program for students with behavior
disabilitiesa4the elementary school level.The program uses 4wo classrooms to provide for 15 students.
The housing requiremerrts for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by lwo ciassrooms.
Loss of PertnaneM Gapacity 1 room �26.5 each = (27)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (27)
9
Aubum School District No.408 -
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 fArough 2077 �
STANDARD OF SERHICE� �
SPEC/AL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Aubum SchooF District operetes a,resource room program at the elementary level for
special education studer�ts requiring instruction;o aCdress theirspeoific disabilities. Fourteen standard
classrooms are required to house this program.T6e housing reguiremerrts for thisprogram ezceed
the SPI space guidelines by seyen standard classrooms. The loss of capacity is expeeted as growth
in program is larger than Me total elemeMary population.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 26.5 each = (186)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms(ai�26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (186)
NATIVE AMER/CAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Aubum School District operates ane resource room to support the education of Native American
studerrts at the elementary level. One standard classroom:is fully Cedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27)
Loss of Temporery Capaciry'0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (27)
HEAD START
Thie Aubum School District operates a Head Start progrem for approximately 120 youngsters in six
sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elemerNary schools and utilizes
threestandard elementary classrooms andauxiliary office spaces: The housing requirements
for this program are not provided for,in the SPI spaee guidelines.
Loss of Permanerrt Capacity 3 rooms(a�26.5 each = (80)
Loss of Temporary Capadty 0 rooms�26.5 each = 0
Totel Capacity Loss . (80)
EARLY CH/LDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATlON
The Aubum School District operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities betow
age five. Thisprogram is housed aYseven iiiffererrt elementary scFiools and wneMly uses ten
standard Gassrooms:.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPl
space guidelines.
Loss ofPermaneM Capadty 10 rooms�26.5 each = (265)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (265)
READlNG LABS
The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard dassroom spaces ff available in
each elemeritary school. Four elemeritary schools do not have non-standard rooms available,thus
they are housed in a standard Gassroom.:The housing requiremeMs for this program are not
provided for in the SPI space guidelines. .
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 4 Pooms @ 26.5 each= (108)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss. (106)
10
nubum School obtria No.4ob
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 Mrough�17
STANDARD OF SERVICE
MUSIC ROOMS
Tfie district"etementarymusic programs require one acousticallymodified classroom at each
elementaryscNool fonmusiainstruction. The housing requirements are not proVided for
in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capaciry 14 rooms(d�26.5 each= (371)
Loss of Temporary Capadty 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (371)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM
The Aubum SchoofDistrict operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for studerrts
leaming English as a second language. This progrem requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not
provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of PermaneM Capaaty 14 rooms(d126.5 each= (371)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0 rooms @ 28.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (371)
SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM
The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impaded
elementary.schools. This pullout model provides dired insUudion to students who are not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are
not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 8 rooms@ 26.5 each= (212)
Loss of Temporary 6apacity 0 rooms�26.5 each= 0
Total Capaaty Loss (212)
ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPEC/ALIST PROCaRAM
The Aubum School Districtprovides a leaming specialist program to increase literacy,skills for
first and second graders. This progrem model has tieen areated from the.l-728 funds and currenUy
has ttie speoialist going into existing teacher Gassrooms, as well:as pulling out studerrts irrto
designated Gassrooms. The distrid is utilizing Gassrooms at all fourteen elemerrtary schools.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms�28.5 each= (371)
Loss of Temporary Capadty 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (371)
WCL DAYK/NDERC,ARTEN
The Aubum School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for.
kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition,ARRA funds and currently
there are two schools receiving state funding for 2010-11 school year. The district is utilizing fourteen
classrooms at eight of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requiremerrts exceed the OSPI space
guidelines for this program by seven dassrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms�26.5 each= (186)
Loss of Temporary Capacity O rooms @ 26.5 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (186)
11
Aunum School DlsMct No.408�
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
zw t enmu9n so±�
STAIi�ARD OF SERNCE.
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
SPEClAL EDUCA7YON RESOURCE ROONIS
The Aubum School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level.
This is to acoommodate special education studerrts needing remedial instruction to;address their specffic
disabilities. Eleven classroomsare required at 4he.middle schoof level to provide for approximately 350 students.
The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
ADAPTIVE BEHAV/OR SPEClAL EDUCATIDN
The Aubum School Distrid offers a seH-coirtained program for studeMs with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The progrem is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one Gassroom.. The housing
requirements for this program are provided.for in the SPI space allocationa
STRUCTURED LEARN/NG CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPEC/AL EDUCATION
The Aubum 8chool District operates four structured leaming classrooms at tlie:middle school level for
students with moderate tosevere disabilitiesand one developmentally disabled Gassroom for students with
profound disabilities. Two of the four classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPl space allocations.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 26.5 each= (53)
Loss of Temporary Capaciry 0 rooms @ 26.Seach= 0
Tatal Capacity Loss (53)
M/DDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS
The Aubum School Disfict aperates aminimum of one computer lab at each middle school.This progrem
utilizes a shandard classroom per middle school.`fhe housing requiremerits for this progrem
are not provided for in the SFl space guidelines.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each= ' (120)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms_@ 30 each= 0
Total Capaaty Loss (120)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE
The Aubum School District operates a puliout program at the middle scfioolJedel for studerKs
leaming English as a seoand language. Thisprogram requires four standard Gassrooms that arenot
provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capaciry 4 rooms�30 each= (120)
Loss of Temporary Capaciiy0 rooms @ 30 each.= 0
ToWI Capacity Loss (120)
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Aubum School Distrid provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes
elective options in special interest areas: Facilities to accommodate speeial interest adivities are
not amenable to standard Gassroom usage: The distrid averages 95%'utilization of all available
teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 11/23/10 identifies 148 teaching.stations available in the
mid-level facilRies. The utilization patfem results in aloss of approximately 8 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each= (240)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0 rooms @ 30 each= " 0
Total Capacity Loss (240)
12
AuDum School DlsMcl No.408�
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
�17 thmugh�17
� STANDARD OF SERVICE
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
SENIOR HfGH COMPUTER LABS
The Autium ScFiool District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools.This
program utiliies rivo standard elassroortis at comprehensive high schools and one at West Aubum.
The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms�30 each= (210)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total Capadty Lass (210)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUACaE
The Aubum School Dishict operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students
leaming English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not:
qrovided foain the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of PermaneM Capacity 3 rooms(d 30 each= (90)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= U
Total Capaaty Loss (90)
ADAPT/VE BEHANOR SPEC/AL EDUCATION
The Aubum School Disfict offers a seH contained program for sWdents with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The progrem is housed at one of the high sctiools and uses ane classroom. The housing
requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPf space allocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms(c�30 each= (30)
Loss of Temporary Capadty 0 rooms(d� 80 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
STRUCTURED LEARN/NG CENTER PROGRAM
The Aubum School District operates six structured leaming eenter Gassrooms for students with
moderate to severe disabilities. This program require's Mro standard Gassrooms that are nofprovided
for in the SPl space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms(�30 each= (60)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms�30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (60)
SPEC/AL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Aubum School Distrid operates a resaurce room program at the senior high level for speciat
education students requiring instrucUon to address their specificleaming disabilities. The current
high school program requires eleven Gassrooms to provide progrem to meet educational needs of
the studerds. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the eleven teaching stations.
Loss of PertnaneM Oapaciry 10 rooms @ 30 each= (300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms�30 each= 0
ToWI Capacity Loss (300)
13
Aubum School WsUiG No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
. . .Z017 through Z017 '
STANDARD OF SERVICE -
PERFORM/NG ARTS CENTERS
Aubum High Sctiool inGudes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Pertorming Arts Center. The
SPf Inventory includes this space when compWng unhoused student capabity. This space was
not intended for nor is it usable for Gassroom InsVuction. It was constructed to provide a
communi4y center for the pertorming arts.. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 dassrooms.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each= (250)
ROOM UTILIZATION
The Aubum School Dishict provides a comprehensive high school progrem that includes numerous
electiye options in speeial interest areasi Faqilities to`accommodate speeial iMerest acti4ities are
not amenable to standard Gassroom usage. The district averages 95°h utilization of all available
teaching stations.There are 785 teaching sfations available in the senior high Yacilities. The utilizaUon
pattem results in a loss of appropmately 10 teaching stations.
Loss of PermaneM Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each= (300)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0 rooms(c�30 each= 0
Total Capaciry Loss (300)
STANDARD OF SERV/CE COMPUTED TOTALS
ELEMENTARY
Loss of Permanerrt Capacity= (2,200)
Loss of Terriporary Capaeity 0
Total Capacity Loss (2,200)
MIDDCE SCHOOL.
loss of Permanent Capacity= (533)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0
Total Capaaty Loss (533)
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Pertnanerrt Capacity= (1,240)
Loss of Temporary Capaaty 0
Total Capaciry Loss (1,240)
TOTAL
Loss of Pertnanern Capacity= (3,972)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (3,972)
14
Aubum Schaol District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
ZO'I7 through Z077
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES � �
Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities.
Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by.school. The district uses relocatable
faciliries to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance azeas uniquely impacted by increasing school
populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting.
2. make space available for changing program requiremenu and offerings determined by unique student
needs,and
3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed.
Relocatable fuilities are deemed to be interim,stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing
physical plants. Core facilities(i.e.gymnasiums,rcstrooms,kitchens;labs,lockers,libraries,etc.)are not of
sufficient size or quantiry to handle the increased school popularion served by adding relocatable classrooms.
Teble Permunrnt Facilities District School�Facilities
N.l @ OSPI Rated Capaciry . . ---�
(November 2010) �
Buildin Ca aci Acres Address
Elemenm Schools
_Wasfiin Ele 486 . 5.40 20 E'Strcet Northeas Auburn WA,98002
Tvmidal Park Elemrn 408 6J0 1101 D Street Soirth Aubum WA 98002
DickBcobee Elem 4Z7 10.50 1031 14ttf Straet North Aubum WA 98002
Pioaeer:Elem 441 830 2301 M Street Sobtheast Aubum WA 98002
Chinook Elemen 440 8.75 3502 Autidm Wa South Aulium WA 98092
liea Hill Elemen 450 10.00 30908 124tfi Avenue Southbast Auburn WA 98092
Gildo Elemen S51 10.00 ]005 37th Street South Autiurn WA 98002
Eve--en Hei ts Elem. 456 - 8.09 5602 Souffi316tk Aubum WA 98001
A1 ac Eleinen- 497' ]0.60 310 Milwaukee Bo6levard North Pacific WA 98047
La&e View Elemen 559._ 16.40 16401:SoutHesst 318Ni Street,Aubum WA,98092
Haz8lwood Elemm 580 12.67 118158out}ieest 304th Street,Aubum WA 98092
Ilalko Elem 585 12.00 301 Oraveti Plaoe South Aubum WA 95092
Lakeland HilLs Elemrn 594' 12.00 1020 Ev -- "Wa SE,Aubum WA,98092
Arthur Jacobsrn Elemen 614 - ]0.00 29205 132 Street SE;Au6um WA,98092
ELEM CAPACITY 7,138
Middle Sc600ls
Cascade Middle School 829 17.30� 101524t6�Street Northeast Auburn WA 98002
OI m ic Middle School 921 17.40� I825 K Street South Aubum WA 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116tt�Avenue South Aubum WA 98092
ML Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street South Aubum WA 98002
MS CAPACITY 3 430
:SeniorNi Schools
West Auburn Hi h Scfiool 233' . 5:10 401 West MaircStreet Aubum WA 98001
A66um Senior Hi 2 101 18.60 800 Fourth Stree[Northeas Aubum WA 98002
Aubum Riverside HS 1 387 33.00 501 Oravetz Ro Auburn W 98092
Aubum Mourtainview HS 1 443 40.00 28900 124 Ave SE Aubum WA 98092
SH CAPAC[TY 5 164
TOTAL CAPACITY 15 732
�s
Aubum Schoof Dis6iG No.408
CAPITAL FACiLJT1ES PLAN
, 2010 Mrough 2017
INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
TABLE TEMPORARYIRELOCATABLE
N.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY
Mareh2011 -- — -
� Elerrienti-.LOCation . . .� - '� 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14� �201415- 201518 - ���2�16-17 -
Washingtdn 0 0 0 0 0 0� � 0-
Tertninal Park � 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Chinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Lea Hill 5 5 5 2 2 2 2
Gildo Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Evergreen Haights 0 0 0 2 2 2 2
Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 .2 2
Leke Vew 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 �
Hazelwood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ilalko� 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Lakeland Hills Elementary 2 2 2 4 4 4 4
Arthur Jambsen Elemanta 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL'UNITS 32 32 32 33 33 33 33
TOTAL CAPACIN 848 848 848 875 875 875 875
Middle School LocaGOn 2010.11 2011-12 2012-13 201&14 201415 201516 2016-17
Cascade 0 0� 0 0 2 2 � 2
Otympic 0 0 0 0 2 2. 2
Rainier 5 S 5 7 7 8 8
Mt. Baker 8 8 . 8 8 8 $ 8
TOTAL UNITS - 13 13 13 15 19 20 � 20
TOTAL CAPAGTY 390 390 390 450 570 600 600
Sr..Hi h School Location 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 201314 2014-15 2015]6 _201&17
VHest Aubum 0 0 0 0 1 1 1" "
Auburn High School 12 12 12 12 12 12. 12
Aubum High School-'TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 1
Aubum Riverside. 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Aubum Mourdainview 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTALUNITS � 26 26 26 28� �27 - 2T - - �"27 — .
TOTAL CAPAG7Y 780 780 780 780 810 810 810
'TAP'-Transition Assistance Program for 1&21 year old studer�with special needs:
COMBINm TOTAL UNITS 71 71 71 74 79 80 80
COMBMEDTOTAL CAPACITY $018 2,016 2,018 2,105 2,255 28S - _2,285 -
n
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section V
Pupil Capacity
,i
�
nueumscnooi oisma No.aoa
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 throuph 2017
PUPIL CAPACITY
While the Aubum School District uses the SPI inventary of pertnanent facilities as the data from
which W determinespace needs,the Distrid's educational program requires more space than that
provided for under the fortnula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in
Section III, Standard of Service. The DistricYs capacity is adjusted to refled the need for additional
space tohouse itsprograms. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded
facilities.The combined effect oithese adjustments isshown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below.
Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units inGudad and Table V.2 without these units.
Ta61e V.1
Capadty -
WITH relocatables 2�10-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 :2016-1Z
A. SPICapacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 585
1/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 80�
B. CapacityAdjustments 1,954 1,954 1,954 1,868 1,718 1,688 1,688
C. Net Capacity 13,778 13,778 13,778 13,864 14,014 14,844 15,429
D. ASD Enrollment 14,482 14,586 14,628 15,160 15,582 15,924 16;28fi
� E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (704) (808) (1,050) (1,296) (1,568) (1,080) (857)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
Include Relocatable 2,018 2,018 2,018 2,105 2,255 2,265 2,285
2/ Exclude SOS 14 3,972 3,972 3,872 3,972 3,972 3,972 3 972
TotalAdjustments (1,954) (1,954) (1,954) (1,868) (1;718) (1,688) (1,688)
Table V.2
Capacily
VYITHOUTrelocatables 201a11 2011-12 2012-73 201314 201415 2015-16 2D1&17
.A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532
A.1 SPI Capaciry-New Elem 585
1/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800
B. Capacity Adjustments 3,972 3,972 3,972 3 972 3 972 3 972 3 972
G. NetCapadty 11,760 11,760 11,760 11,760 11,760 12,560 13;145
D. ASD Enrollment 14,482 14,586 14,828 15,160 15,562 15,924 16;286
3/, E. ASDSurplus/Deficit (2,722) (2,826) (3,068) (3,400) (3,822) . (3,364) (3,141)
CAPACIN ADJUSTMENTS
g/ Exclude SOS 14 3,972 3,972 3,972 3,972 3,972 3,972 3,972
Total AdJustments (3,972) (3,972) (3,972) (3,972) (3,972) (3,972) (3,972)
1/ New facilkies ahoum in 201 S16 and 2016-17 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan.
2/The Standard of�Service represents 25.38%of SPI capacity. VJhen new facilities are added the SWndard
� of Service compufations are decreased to 23.35°k of SPI capaaty. � �
�Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commans, library,theater,shared teaching space).
19
Aubum Sehool DlsbiC No.408
CAPRAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 through 2017 .
PERMANEN7 FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY
�SPI Rated CapacHy
March 2011
A. Elamenta Schools
euildin 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17
. Washington � 488 486 486� 4B6 486� 486 486
Tertninal Park 408 408 408 � 408 408 408 408
Dick Scobee 477 477 477 . 477 477 477 477
Pioneer ' 441 q41 441 441 441 441 441
Chinoak 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
Lea Hill 450 450 450� 450 450 �450 450
Gildo Rey 551 551 �551 551 �551 351 551
. Evergreen.Heights 456 456 456. 456 456� 456 456
Alpac� 497 497 497 497 497 497 497
Lake Vew 559 559 559 559 559 559 559
Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580
Ilalko 585 � 585 � 585 585 385 585 585
Lakeland Hills 594 � 594 594 594 �594 �594 594
ArthurJacobsen 614 614 674 614 614 614 614
E�emeata #15 585
ELEM CAPACIT/ 7;138 7,138 7,738 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,723
B. . Middle Schoals
Buildin 2010-1-1 2011-12 2012-13 '2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17'
Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829
Olympic 921 921 921� 921 921 921 921
� - Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843
Mt:Baker 837 837 837 837 �837 837 837
Middle Schoal if5 800 800
MS CAPACITY 3,430 3;430 3,430 �3,430 3,430 4,230 4,230
C. Senior Hi h Schools
Builtlin 2010-11 2011-12 2012-.13 '201&14 201415 2015-16 2016-17
WestAubum 233 233 233� .` �233 � 233 � - 233 233 �
Aubum 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2.101 2,101 2:101 -
Au6um Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387
Aubum MounWinview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443
SHCAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 ' �5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164
COMBiNED CAPACITY 15 7S2 '�. 16,732 16,732�. . �16,732 15,732 �16 532 17117
20
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section VI
Capital Construction Plan
Aubum School DlsVict No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 fhmugh�17 :
CAPRAL CONSTRUC710N PLAN
The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in
1974 wkh the formation of a community inride ckizens corrimittee. The resuR of this committee's
work was published in the document tkled 'Guidelines foc Deve/opment.' In 1985 the Board
formed a second Ad Hoc citlzens committee to pick up from the work of the first and address the
needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the
document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc
citizens committee to make recommendations for improvemerrts to the DistricYs programs and
physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled
'Education lnto The Twenty-First Century--A Community Involved.'
The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementaUon,
funding, and deployment of technology throughout the DistricPs programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate
technoiogical applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology
at a level sufficienf to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In
2005 a replacement technology levy was approved to continue to support technology across all
facets of the DistricYs teaching, leaming and operations.
In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District.
must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District
must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible" The Ad Hoc
recommendation included commeMary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent
rates of assessment.
A proposRion was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six
years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds
to acquire school sites.
During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Ckizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by
the Auburn and Dieringer Schoof Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the
school population from an area 4haf inciudes a large development known as Lakeland South.
Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southem boundary of the Aubum
School District. On June 16, 1998 theAd Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a
joint meeting of the Aubum and Dieringer Boards of Diredors. On June 22, 1998 the Aubum
School Board adopted Resoiution No:933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of
the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On
June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98
authorizing 4he process to initiate theadjustment af the boundaries in accordance with the Ad
Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transferof an area from
Dieringer to Aubum con4aining mosf of the Lakeland South development and certain other
undeveloped properties. Development in 4his area is progressing at an aggressive rete.
In April of 2002,the Board forrned a fifth citizeds Ad Hoc.committee to address the following
two items and make recommendations to the board in the Fall of 2002:
a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of9985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees
related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of
possible financing plans for new facilities.
b. Develop recommendafions for accommodating high school enrollmenYgrowth for the
next 10 years 'rf a new senior high school is not built.
2z
AuDUm�School�IStrIG No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2071 Shrough 2077
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This committee recommended the board place the high school on the ballot for the fiHh time in
February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The
school opened in the Fall of 2005.
In the Fail of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design
for Elementa,ry#13 and Elementary#14. In the Fall of 2004,the Aubum School Board passed
Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementaryschools on the ballot in February 2005. The
voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hilis Elementary .
(Elementary#13) opened in the Fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary#14) is
located in the Lea Hill area on a 10 acre site and opened in the Fail of 2007. These two
elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea
Hiil areas of the school district.
In the 2004-05 schooi year,the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again
study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of
study was the need forNew Facilitiesand Modernization. The committee made a number of
recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a
capital improvements program to modemize or replace facilities based upon criterion.
During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by
the Aubum and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school
population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the
north Aubum valley. On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at
a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School
Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the
boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On .
June 26, 2006 the Aubum Schooi Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 author¢ing
the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc
Committee's recommendation. These actions resuRed in the transfer of an area from the Kent
School District to the Aubum School District effective September 29, 2006.
In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to
modemize orreplace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Ckizen's Ad Hoc Committee.
These recommendations, based on spec�c criteria, led to the school board placing a school
improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did noY
approve eithermeasure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools.
The board decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009,
which passed at 55.17%._The levy will fund $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24
sites over the next seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools has
started with educational specifications and schematic design processbeginning in 2010. A
future bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects.
The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed
for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old.
The school district acquired a site for a future middle school in 2009 and wili need to consider
possibilities for a ske for elementary school#15.
23
Aubum Sehool Dis6id.No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011.througli 2C77 -. .
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
The District isprojecting 1800 addiGonaf students within the six year period including the
Lakeland,Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will
require the acquisition of new middle school and new elementary school sites and construction
of a middle school and elementary school during the six yearwindow.
Based upon the DistricYs capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student
generation data included in Appendix A.3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-
six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from
new development,with the remaining aiiditional capacity required to address existing need.
The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact
timelines are wholly dependeM on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage
of bond issues and/or capital.improvementievies.
2011-17 Capital Construetfon,Plan
Mareh 2011
Projeated Fund Project Timelines
Pro'ect Funded Cost Source 10-11 11-12 72-13 13-14 1415 1516 16-17
All Faalities- 2006
Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX XX
Modemization Cap tsvy
Portables Yes $1,200,000 �Fepes � � � � � � �
Property Purchase Impaa
New Elementary No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX XX XX
]J mulrovements Yes $46,400,00� ��e?ry� XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
Band XX XX XX
]/ Middle Schoot#5 No 542,500.000 ' impaa Fee lan const o en
Bond XX XX XX
1/ Elementa #15 No $21,750,000 ImpadFee lan const open
Replacemerrt of
thrEC aging No $239,000,aoo , �� Bond Issue XX XX XX XX XX XX XX
1! schools
]/ These fimds may he SeareO Nrough Iocel.�onE issues,-sale of real property,impact tees,antl sfete maffhing funds.
The Distria arrently Is nol ellgiDle for stete assistan�at tlie elemeMery sUOOI level for new constructlon. The AISMe[is eligiEle.for
state matchi�funAS for modemizallan. �- - � �
24
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section VII
Impact Fees
Aubum Sthool Disbicl No.408 -
CAPITAL FACILITIE8 PLAN
2011 Mrough 2017
IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION(Spring 2011)
Middle School 05 wilhin 6 year period
Elemenqry 015 wflhin 6 year perioA
I. SIlECOSTPERRESIDENCE
Formula: (�ACrea z Cost r AcreyFeciliry Size)x Studenl Factor
Stte Cosll FaGlity StuOent Generetion Fedor CosV CosU
Acreage Acre Capadty Single Pamiy Multl Famly �Single Famiy Multi Femiy
Elem(K-5) 12 50 550 0.3130 0.7240 50.00 50.00
Middle Sch(8-8 ; 25 SO 800 0:1540 0.0580 $0.00 $O.OD
Sr High(8-12) . 4D $0 1500 0.1850 0.0519 50.00 SO.OD
� �:.�:iSQ00.��.����_�. �.�'E0.00 �, .. ..
Il. �PERMANENTFACILITYCONSiRUCT/ONCOSTPERRESIDENCE
� �Formula: (�Fac ', CosVFea7ity Size)x Student Facto�x Permenent M Totel Square Footege Pereentege)_ _
' FaciGy Facilily %Perm�5q FV� SNdenl Generetbn Fador CosV CoeV
Single Famfy Cost Size Totel Sq Ft Single Fami Mul�Family Single Famiy Multi Femiy
Elem (K=5) i21.750,000 550 0.9852 0.3130 OA240 SN,946.60 54;732.84 �
MId Sch(6-8) 542,500,000 800 0.9852 0.1540 0.0580 57.896.29 52,871.38
St Hiph(B-12) �$0 1500 0.8852 0.7850 0.0519 f0.00 50.00
-:,E19.81289_.-: �...'E7.BW:22��..:-.
IIA lEMPORARYFACILITYCONSTRI/C7IONC0.STPERRESIDENCE
Famula: ((FaaT CosUFaality Size)z SWdent Fador):(Tempo�a to Totel S uara Foolape Ratio)
Fec�ly Faci6y %Temp Sq FV. Sludent Generatbn Fedor CosU Costf �
� SMgle Famiy Cost �Size � Total Sq Ft Shgle Famiy Multl Famiy Smgle FaMy Muld Femiy
- Elem(K-5p 5/30,000 . �28.5 0.0348 0.3130 0.1240 f53.48' $21.18
MMSeh(8-8) 5170,000 �30 0.0348 0.1540 0.0560 523.24� f8.45
Sr Hiph(9-12) $0 30 0.0348 0.1850 0.0519 50.00. j0.00
� _df78J2,:.= .:� �.::rSY8.61.'� .�
N. STATE MATCH CREDfi PER RES/DENCE � �
Formula: (Bcedch Indez z SPI Footege x DistAct Match x Student Fector)
Boeckh - SPI DisNCt Student Generetlon Factor CosU CosV .
Indez Foutege Makh 31 le Famiy MuKi Femiy Single Famiy Multl Fami
Elem(K-5) 5180.17 90 58.87% D.3730 0.7240 52,977:73 57,178.68
� MId Sch(B•B) $180.17 108 58.87°h 0.1540 0.0560 51;758.70 i839.31
SrHlph 8-72 $780.17 130 58.67% 0.7650 0.0518 $2,267.39 5713.20
idS7,003.Z2 ' t'.-SZ.19218..'.�;'.
28'
Aubum Sehool Districi No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
. 20H.tbrough 2017
, V, TAXCREDITPERRESIDENCE� ,
Fmmula:!Expressed es tlre present value oi an annudy .
TC=PV(interest rate.discount period.eveiage assd value x fex rete) � .
Ave Resid � Curt Dbt Serv 8nd Byr In�c Number of Taz Credit Taz CredA
Asad Veltie 7erz Rete � Mn Int Rete Yeafa Sinple Femiy Multi Femly -
�SinplBFemily , 52�6,765 50.93. 4.91% 10 "::b'1�801.78`-;
. Muld Femiy f67,821 50.93 4.91% 10 =`='S18f.22;�_-���'� '
M. DEVELOPERPRONDEDFAdL1TYCREDIT
. Fortnula: (Value of Site or FacilityMumber of dwelling unils) � _
Value No.of Uniis FaGI CredN
Single Famity 50.00 1 1_..�.�.:��_iS0.00i.._._�..
Multi Famly 50.00 1 !- �: .:�50.00.�.
FEE .. �., . -�-��PERUNRIMPACT;FEES;.__�_..:._..
RECAP Siigle MuNi
SUMMARY Femiy Femi
Site CosW 50.00 50.00
Pe�menent FedGy Const Costs 519,842.89 E7,BM.22 .
Temporary Fatility Caats f76.72 529.84
State Match CredA (57,00322) ($2,532.18)
TB�[Cretlil - (31,807�:79) (5487.22)
FEE(No Uiscounq 571.774.80 54,870.44
� FEE(50%Discount) � 55,557.30 E2,30522
Fedli CredH . �50.00 50.00
NetFee�.061 don � �:.�E5,55Z80i � 5�.903.Yt�
27
/Wbum School District No.408�
CAPITAL FACILITIE3 pLAN
.2017thtou h 201
i>':� . --;SINGLE��FAMILYR_ -.�� : .. . . ;=r. -: "-c= :MULTIFAMILY �---_"=` - � -'
IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem � I Mid Seh� Sr High � Elem � Mid Sc� Sr High �
K-5 _B-8 9-12 K-5 8-8 � 9-12 �
_. . . . _ . . _ . .. . . .
Student Fador Singk Famy�-Aubum eclual count(3110) 0.313 � 0.754 0.765 0.724 0.058 0.052
New Fac Capacity 550 B00 1500 550 800 7500
New Feuliy Cost ElemeMary Cost EsUmetea Feb 2008 E21.750.000 542,500,000 f21.750,000 542,500,000
M'Mdle School Cost Estimete Fe6 2008
Temp Rm CaOaciry ASO Distrkt StendaN otService. 28.5 30 30 28.5 30 30
Grades K-5�28.5 end 8•72�30.
Temp Faciliy Cost Relocafebles,Includinp site xrork,set up,and furnishinp 5130,000 $730,000 5130,000 5130.000 5730,000 5730,000
&ite AcreaBe ASD DisVkt StendaM or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12. 25 40
SNe.CosVAcre See bebw � 5326,827 E326,827 5328,827 �5328,827 .5328,827 E328,827
Perm Sq Foofage � SPI Rpt 93 deted Nw 23,2070 1,710,833 7,710,833 1,770,833 1.710,833 7,710.833 1,710.833
TempSqFootage 70porlablesat832'sq:M.each+TAP3500 67,740 81,740 81�,740 81.740 61,740 81,740
Tolel Sq Footepe Sum of Permenenl end Temporery ebove � 1.772.573 1,772,573 1;772,573 1;772,573 7-,772,573 7,772,573
%-Perm FaaTities Permenent Sq.Foolage tlivhled by Total Sq.Footape 96.52% 96.52% 98.52°h 96.52% 96.52% 98.52%
%-Temp FaGlilies Tempwary Sq.FooNape divided by Tofel Sq.Footage 3.48% 3.48% 3.48% 3.48% 3.48% 3.48%
SPI Sq FNStudent From SPI Regulatbns 90 108 130 9D 108 130
Boeckhlnde: FromSPlscheduleforMarch2011 � 5780.77 5180.77 5180:17 S760J7 5180.17 5180.17
Match%-Slale From SPI Nkbpege Malch 2011 58.67% 58.8T% 58.87°h 58.67°� 58.67% 58.67°h
Makh°k-Oistrid � Comp�ted 41.33% 41.33Ne 41.33% 47.33% 41.33% 41��.33%
Dist Avei AV IOng Counly DepeAinent ot Asseasmenis March 2011 $248,765 5248,765 E248,785 587,821 567,821 567,821
(muld fem�ly weightetl averege iuludes condos)
Debt Serv Tau Rate Curtent Fiscal Year g0.93 50.93 50.93 50.93 50.93 �50.93
G.OBOndlntRate CurrenlRate-(BondBuyer201�exMarch2017) 4.91%a 4.87% 4.87qo 4.91°k 4:87�0 4.B1Yo
Slte Cost Pro'ect/ons
.Reoent Property Purchaae Purohase Pmchase AdJusted ProJected Annual Sites Latest Date Projeeted
Acqulsidons Acreage Year Piice CosUAcre Present D Inflation Faetor Required of Acqulsitlon CosUACia
Lekelend 12.00 2002 52.701,043 5225,087 5310,887 - -
Lebratlor 35.00 2008 57.801;799 5217,794 f223,710
LakeleiM East 27.00 200B E9.092,160 5338,747 5336,747
Totel 74.00 $18,395,002 5282,095 3290,381 3.00Y, ElemenNary 2014 $328,827
28
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2011 through 2017
Section VIII
Appendix
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.3- Student Generafion Survey
Appendix A:1 - Student Enrollmenf Projections
Auburn School District #408
Student Enrollment Projections
October 2010
Introduction
The projective techniques,give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for
forecasting the future: In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant
variableswithin the data being used. These assumptions aze`judgmental"by definition. Forecasting
can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future,or from the known
to the unknown. The auached tabulaz data reviews the history of student enrollment,sets out some
quantitative assumpNons,and providesprojections based on these numerical factors.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological,psychological,economic,
and politioal factors that are present in any demographio-analysis and projection. The logic embraces
the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past aze present today,and will
be in the funue. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen
yeazs and six years respectively. The resulu provide a trend,which reflects a long(13-year)and a short
(6-yeaz)baze from which to extrapolate.
' Two methodsof esticnaring the number ofkindergarten students have beeaused. The first uses[he
, average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding
yeaz. The second derives what the average percentage Aubum kindergartners have.been of live births
in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent foiu years.
The degree ro which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact.
This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic
� being used to calculate fixtiire projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viabiliTy and
oredibiliry of the projections derived by these techniques.
Tables
Tbble 1—Thirteen Year Historv ofOctober I Enro[lments—page 3
The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enroilment. This data
shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each yeaz.
Table 2—Historical Factors Used rn Pro'ec1 110n5-page 4
7'his table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table l. These factors have been
used in the subsequent projections. The thme factors are:
L FaMOr 1 —Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels
� This factor is sometimes referted to as the"holding power"or"cohort survivat:' It is a
measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the
next.
2. FaMor 2 -Average Pupil C6ange by Grade Level
This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-yeaz period.
3. Fector 3—Auburn School District Kindergarteo Enrollment as a FunMion of King
County Live Births.
This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live
births in the S previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the
kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 yeazs.
�
Table 3—Proiection Models—pages 5-13
This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections.The
- models arc explained briefly below.
❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten
(Factor 2)and the 13-yearaverage change between gade levels(Factor 1). The dab is
- shown for the district as a whole.
o Table 3.6(pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it
shoRens the historical to only the most rececit 6 years.
O Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)-uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted
for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates aze derived from the King County live births instead
of the averagegain.
o Tables 3E.13,3E.6;3E.13A,3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district
ptojectioa Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pnpil gain by grade
articulation.
O Tables 3MS.13,3MS.6,3M5.13A,3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 grades from the
district pmjection Summary level data is provided for pe*centage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulafion.
o Tables 3SH:13,3SH.6,3SH:13A,3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the
district projection. Siunmary level data is provided for peraentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
❑ Table 4{pg 10)—Collecu the four projection models by grade group for ease of
compazison.
o Table 5(pgs 11-13)—shows how well each proje_ction,model performed when compared.
with aptual enrollments: Data is provided in both pum(ier aqd percent formats for the
past 13 years.
Summarv
This year we had a second consecutiva yeaz of unprecedented decline in student enrollment of 107
studenu. The loss of those students chaiiges:our historical average gain in students.Over the past 6
yeazs the gain is now.97%annually down from I.53%;that equates to 135 students down from 213
in prior projec[ions. Over the past 13 yeazs the average gein has dropped from I.41%to.92%and
equates to 122 studrnu annually down from 189 students.
Using the whort survival models;ttfe data below is a summary of the range of variation between the
four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. ' '
The models show changes in the ne�R six years: '
• Elementary level shows increase ranging from 449 to 545. (page 9) '
• Middle School level shows increase ranging from 190 to 211.(page 8)
• High School level showsincreases ranging from 32 to 104.(page 9)
Themodels show these changes looking forward thirteen years:
• Elementary level shows increase ranging from 917 to 109L(page 7)
• Middle School level shows increase ranging from,414 to 498. (page 8)
• High School level shows increase ranging from 485 to 531.(page 9)
This data does not factor new developments.that are currently under construction or in the planning
stages.
2
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTION5-October 2010
TABLE ThiNeen Year History oi Ottoher 1 Enrdtmenffi(Rev 1U/10)
� Attual
GRADE 88199 99-00 I 00-01 01-02 i 02-03 03-04 0405 05-06 06-07 07-08 0&-09 09-10 10.77
KDG 854 B49 912 B48 � 905 922 882 955 847 998 998 7032 1070
1 - 995 943 ' BOS 86B I 900 982 960 963 1072 I 985 1015 1033 1068
2 � 1023 1015 ' 914 849 �� 961 909 992 963 1002 � 1019 1024 998 1018
3 j 1009 1054 ; 1031 B68 i 940 996 918 1002 7031 � 987 1048 993 1013
4 � 874 1012 7071 1077 �'�. 973 847 1D16 938 1048 � 1057 1044 1073 1024
5 i 982 9B3 � 7011 1108 � f082 1078 957 1065 898 � 1078 1069 1030 1078
e � 982 981 99B 1028 � H04 1171 1D20 1004 7058 I 1007 1096 1040 1041
7 � 939 f015 � 979 1017 1021 1131 1124 7D28 1014 1057 7034 1125 1060
e I 859 974 ; 1003 1004 � 7028 f052 1130 7737 7072 � 1D33 7078 1031 1112
9 I 1158 1202 1222 1405 ' 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 � 1337 1256 1244 1221
1D I 1165 7732 � 1157 1073 j 7234 1249 1281 1�83 1400 � 1368 1341 1277 7238
11 1007 1038 ��, 7087 7090 �� 927 7D10 1065 1182 1322 i 1352 1350 1303 725B
12 B17 B55 �� B85 930 i 833 902 888 1088 1147 � 7263 1352 1410 1344
TOTALS 12942 13D51 13135 13481 13427 13702 13672 74088 14418 74559 14703 14589 14482
Percent of Gain O.B4% 0.64% 2.48% (025)% 2.05% (U.22)% 3.04% 2.34% 0.88% 0.98% (0.78)% (0.73)%
Pupil Gein 109 84 328 34 275 30 418 330 141 144 (114) (107)
Avarege%Gein for ist 8 years. 0.92% Averega%Gein fW�est 8 yeers 0.97%
A Pu '1 Gein for 1 st 6 years. 122 Pu 'I Gain tor last 8 135
Averege% Gein for 13 y�s. 0.95%
A W l Gein for 13 years. i2B
TABLE
tA GretleGrou Combinatione
KDG 854 849 912 848 905 922 892 955 941 9B6 998 1032 1010
1(/,2 2872 2807 2731 2763 2768 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3082
K-5 5837 5858 5844 5914 5747 57T4 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208
K-fi 6799 8837 8842 6842 8845 6885 6755 8897 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249
7-3 3027 3012 2850 2683 2801 2887 2870 2828 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095
t-5 4983 5007 4832 5068 4838 4852 4843 4932 5092 5148 s2oo 5127 5198
1-6 5945 5888 5930 8098 5840 5963 5863 5838 8750 8153 6296 8167 6239
6-B 2860 2B70 2980 3049 3157 3294 3274 3189 3744 3087 3206 3796 3273
7-B iB98 1B89 1982 2021 2047 2183 2254 2185 2088 2080 211D 2156 2772
7-9 3054 3191 3204 3428 3488 3658 3715 3544 3458 3427 3386 3400 3393
9-12 4245 4225 4311 4498 4535 463M1 4683 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5081
10-12 3089 3023 3088 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 9869 3983 4043 3990 3840
prj10-N Pege 3 Oclober 2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2010
TABLE Fectas Uaed in Projedions
2 FaGOr AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRIC7 KINDERGARTEN ENROILMENTS
3 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUN7Y LNE BIRTH RATES
Fectw A�er�e Pupil Chenge BeMeen Grede CAL- TOTAL VEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGIIRTEN
1 Le�els ENDAR LNE 213rds 1/3rds OF LNE KDG ENROLLMENTASA%OF
13 YEAR&43E � B YEAR BASE VEAR BIRTH3 BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LNE BIRTHS
Kto 1 53.33 - Kto 1 39.80 1972 13,719 9,148 4,573 78/7B 13,539 59B 4.477%
1 to2 7.58 1 to2 6.20 7873 13,449 B,B88 4,483 79lBD 73,478 BiB 4.585%
2 to 3 18.33� 2 t0 3 ! 15 20 7974 13,4B3 8,895 4,498 80/61 13,524 600 4.438%
_.____-. .__.-._ . __._{_'_"
3to4 24.751 3to4 � 35.20 1975 13,540 9,027 4,513 81182 13,687 SBB 4.298%
_.._._.__._-__-. ...__._.__._.�_._'.'___.
4 to 5 18.83� 4 to 5 18.40 1978 13,781 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 89B 4.858%
5 M 6 10.58 5 to 6 0.40 1877 14,882 B,7B8 4,894 83l84 14,958 868 4.452%
B to 7 18.33 B b 7 J 77.00 1978 15,098 10,084 5,032 84/85 16,048 728 4.524%
7 M 6 13.83 7 M 8 13.20 1978 18,524 11,016 5,508 85l86 16,708 792 4.740%
�8 to 9 283.00 8 M 9 ; 218.20 1980 78,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 829 4.878%
�9 to 10 (89.58) 9 to 10 7.20 7981 17,100 71,400 5,700 87lB8 18,241 769 4.218%
70�0 11 �90.8�; 10 to 11� (36.80) 1882 18,811 12,541 6,270 88l89 18,628 817 4.386%
7110 12 (60.50)� 17 b 12 ! 1.40 1983 78,533 12,355 6,178 89190 18,827 871 4.626%
Wtel 235.83 Mfel 335.40 1880 78,974 72,648 6.325 90191 19,510 858 4.398%
Fector 1 is ihe e�er�e gain a bss ol pupih as they 7985 19,778 13,185 6.593 91/92 19,893 909 4.569%
move han orre grada levd to tire rre�Q. F�tor 7 uses 7888 79,951 73,301 8.650 92/93 21,852 920 4.210%
the past(12)OR(5)yenrs of che�ges. 1887 22,803 15,202 7,601 83184 21,824 930 4.301%
7988 21,034 74,023 7,011 94I95 24,082 927 3.853%
Fector A�rm,ye Wpl Chenge By Orede Leuel 7989 25,578 17,051 8,525 95R8 28,358 954 3.819%
2 1990 26,749 17,833 8,918 98l97 24,718 963 3.993%
13 YEAR BASE 8 YEAR BASE 1991 22,789 15,789 7,800 97/98 20,973 87B 4.683%
K 13.00 K 11.00 7882 20,080 13,373 6,687 BB/99 21,573 854 3.959%
1 5.82 1-� _20.80 1893 22,330 74,887 7,443 99/00 22,128 849 3.837%
2 0.� 2 i 10.80 1994 22,028 14,888 7,343 00/01 24,073 912 3.788%
3 0.93 3 I z.20 iB95 25,005 18,870 8,335 01/02 22,717 848 3.724%
4 4.17 4 j 17.00 1996 21,Si3 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,822 905 4.188%
_ 5 B.OB 5 { 2.80 1997 21,848 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 922 4.188%
--fi- ---�8.58� 8 7.40 1988 22.212 14.808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041%
7 10.08 7 8.40 1999 22,007 14,871 7,336 05/O6 22,327 955 4277%
8 12.75 8 i 5.00) 2000 22,487 14,891 7,496 O6/07 22,014 941 4274% 1e4t6
9 5.42 9 ', (31.60J 2001 21,778 14.519 �.259 07/OB 21,835 998 4.562% year
10 6.08 � 10 ; (29.00) 2002 21,883 14,575 7,ZB8 OB/09 22,242 998 4.48�% AvaregB
11 ..... ._20.92 11 � 15.20 2003 22.431 14.954 7.477 09/10 22,728 1032 Attuel 4.541% 4A61X
12 35.58 ( 72 57.20 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/71 22,745 1010 4.447%
Fector 2 is the a�erage chenge in pratle 1e�91 sQe 2005 22.680 16.120 7,560 11/12 23,723 1014 <_P�ctd Averege
irom 94l85 OR 01IO2. 2006 24244 18,163 8,081 72113 24,683 7016 <-P�cGd A�erege
2007 24,802 18,601 8,301 73I14 25,094 f038 <_Prjctd A�erege
2008 25,180 16,783 8,387 14/15 25,1�1 HO1 <-PrjtM Aeerege
2�09 25,057 18,705 8,352 75/16 •numDer from DOH
Saurce:Center tor Health Sfstistics,Weshington Stete Department of HeaHh
prj14H Pepa 4 OGohet 2D1D
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT$TUDENT ENROLLMENT PRWECTIONS-October 2070
.
TABLE '�.DISTRICT;BROJECTIONSr�� .� " .
�. 3.13 .Basedon�l3�YeerHistory: . �-.-�.i '�,
ACNAL PROJ PROJ� PROJ': PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ� PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQI- -PROJ
GRADE 10A1. 11l12 12113 A3l14 14H5 151i8 16A7 77N8.. � 1Bfl9 19/20 20127 21@2 2Y23� 23-24..�'
KOG 1010 1023 1U38 - 7049 � 1062 1075 1088 1101 1114 7727 H40- 1753 1166 H79
1� 1066 .7083 1078 1aB9 1102 iN5 7728 7141 1154 7167 �NBO 1193 1206 7219
2 1018 1W4 1077 1084 1097 1110 1723 1138 1149 1162 1175 11BB 1201 7214
3 1013 1034� 1D92 7089 1102 1115 1128 7741 1754 7167 N80 1183 1206 1219
4 7�24 1038 1059 7117 7114 1127 1140 1153 77fi8 1179 1192 1205 7218 1231
5 1078 1043 1057 1078 1136 1133 1148 1159 H72 itBS 17BB 1211 1224 1237
6 1041 1090 1053 1087 1089 1148 � 1143 1158 1169 1182 71B5 1208 1227 1234
7 1060 1057 1108 1070 7084 1105 1782 1180 1179 HBB 7789 1272 1225 1238
8 1112 7074 1077 1120 1084 1097 1118 1176 1174 1187 7200 7213 1228 7239
8 1221 1405 1387 1384 1413 1377 1390 7412 1468 1467 1480 1493 7506 1578
10 1238 7751 1335 1297� 1295 1343 1307 1321 1342 740D 1397 1410 1423 1436 ,
17 1258 1147 1081 1245 1207 1204 1253 1218 1230 1251 1309 1308 1319 1332
12 1344 1198 1087 1000 1180 1146 1143 1182 1156 1770 11B1 7249 1246 1259
TOTALS 14482 14387 14471 14689 14967 15093 15271 15485 15822 75829 16036 18234 16387 18556
Pement of Gein (0.59)% 0.52% 1.37% 2.03% 0.85% 1.18% 1.27% 1.D2% 1.33% 1.30% � 123% 0.94% 1.03%
Pu �I Gein 85 74 198 298 127 -178 193 158 207 206 798 153 169
TABLE :DISTRICT�PROJEC710N5�. �
. . . . ,. ��. :
3.8 BaseA un B:Ywr.Hist� � ;.. �..':i .
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10l17 11l12 72N3 13114 14/15 15116 16117 77118 18118 18@0 20121 21@2 22l23 23-24
KDG 1010 1021 1032 1043 1054 1085 1076 1087 10B8 1109 N20 1131 1142 7153
1 7068 1050 1061 1072 1083 1094 1105 1178 7127 1138 7149 1180 1171 1182
2 1018 7074 1058 7069 1080 1091 7102 1113 7124 1735 N48 1157 U68 7779
3 1013 1031 1088 1073 1084 1095 7708 1117 1128 7139 1150 1161 1172 1183
4 1024 1048 1088 1725 1708 1179 7730 1141 1152 1163 1174 1185 1196 7207
5 1078 1042 1087 1085 1143 1727 1138 1149 H60 1171 7182 7193 1204 7215
B 7041 1079 1D43 1087 1085 1143 H27 1138 1148 1160 1171 1182 1193 1204
7 1060 f058 1098 10fi0 7084 1702 1180 1144 H55 H88 1177 1188 U99 7210
8 1112 1073 1071 71f0 1073 1097 1175 1174 1157 1768 1179 1190 1201 7212
9 7221 1328 1269 Y287 7328 1288 7313 1332 1390 1374 1385 1398 1407 1418
10 1238 1228 1335 - 1297 1295 1333 1296 7321 1339 1397 1381 1392 1403 1414
11 1258 1201 1191 1288 1260 1258 7296 7280 1284 1302 1360 1344 1355 1386
12 1344 1258 1203 7183 7300 1281 1259 7298 1261. 1285 1303 1382 �7345 1356
TOTAIS 14482� 14494 14602 14778 14975 15075 15225 15389 15524 15708 15878 78041 18157 18300
PercentofGain U.09% 075% 120% 1:3346- � 0.87% 1.00% 1.07% O.BB% 7�.18% 1.08% 1.03% � 0.72% 0.88%
. Pu F�Gain 12 10B 778 7B7 100 160 183 138 183. ]70. 783 116 143
pry10.1 T . . � . � Pege 6 . - Octo6er 2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT,ENR06LMENT P.ROJECTION3-OcWber 2010
� TABLE '�DISTRICT�PROJECiIONS �i - ' � �
� 3.13A Besedon�BirthRetes�6�13,VearHisW ;.
� ACNAL PROJ PROJ PROJ� PROJ PRQI PRQI, PROJ �� ��pROJ �PROJ PRQI PROJ PROJ PROJ ��
GRADE 10/it 11fl2 12A3 13H/ 14/15 15/16 �16HY 17/78�� 18/19 1B/20 20Y11 21/22 22/23 23-24
-- K 7010 1074 1015 1058 1101 - -
. 1 1066 7083 7067 1068 1112 1154
2 7016 1074 1071 1075 1078 iN9 1162 .
3 1013 1034 1082 1089 1�93 1094 7736 7180 ,
4 1024 1038 1059 1117 1114 1118 1H9 7182 1205
� 5 1079 1043 1057 1078 1138 1133 -7737 1137 1781 7224
6 1041 1090 1053 1087 1088 1148 1143 7747 1748 H82 1234
7 1060 1057 1108 1070 1084 1105 1162 7180 1784 1164 1208 1251
8 1112 7074 1071 1120 1084 1097 1719 7178 1774 1177 1178� 1222 7265
� 9 1221 7405 1387 1380 1413 1377 1390 1412 1489 1467 7470 1471 7515 1558
10 1238 1151 1335 1287 12B5 1343 1307 1321 1342 1400 1387 7407 14�2 1445
11 1258 �114T 7D81 1245 1207 1204 1253 7218 1230 1251 13D9 1308 7310 1317
12 1344 1188. 7087 . ' �1000 1184 ]748 1143 �11B2 1158 1770 1781 7249�� 1246 ' 1250 �
TOTALS 14482 -�A43B8 14441 '� �14848 14985 - �- -
� �PercentofGein ,(0.65)% 0.37% 7.44% 2.3D% . - .
Pupil�Gein 94 53 207 337
TABLE �OISTRICT.PROJEC710N5�.' �
3.6A i Besed ai BiNi�Ratea 8 8 Near Hist � � '�.i
ACTUAL PROJ VROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10/11 11112 12It3 13A/ 14A5 15/i6 16/17 77/18 18/iB 19/20 20@7 21@2 22/23 23-24 �
KDG 1010 f014 1015 1058 11D1
1 1066 1050 1054� 1050 1098 1141
2 1016 1074� 1058 1082 1063� 1106 1149 � � .
3 1013 1D37 1089 �1079 1077 �7078 7121 7164
4 1024 1048' 1088 Y725 1108� 1112 �7113 �7157. � 1199- � . �. � .
5 . 7W9 1042� 1087 �1085 1143 7727 7t37 7731 � 1175 1218
8 7047� 1079 1049 7087 1085 7143 7727 7731 1132 N75 1218 � .
� 7 7060 1058 1098 1080 1084 7102 H80 1144 1148 1149 1782 1235
B 1112 1073 1071 1110 7073 1097 1N5 7174 1157 7761 1782 7206 1248 �
9 1221 1328 7289 1287 7328 1289 1313 1332 1380 7374 7377 1378 /422 1465
10 1238 1228 1335 1297 1285 1333 1296 7321 1338 7387 1381 1385 1385 1429
' 17 1258 1201 1191 1299 1260 1258 7298 7280 1284 7302 1380 1344 1348 1348
12 1344- 1258 1203 7183 1300 1281 7259 1288 1261 1285 1303 1382 7345 1348
TOTALS 14482 14487 14578 14789� 15013 � -
Percent of Gein 0.04% 0.83% 1.31% 1.85% - ,
- Pu 'I Gein 5� 91 187 244 �
pry70.11 .. : . � Pege 6.� . . � � . 'Odober 201D . .
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2010
3E73 '�Basedon��l3YeenHisto ! �
GRADE 70A1 -11112 12/13 13114 . 10I15 15118 16/17 17N8 18/79 19/20 20Y17 21Y22 2223 23-24
1 1088� 1083 1076 tOBB 1702 1115 1128 1147 1754 � 1787 1180 1193 1208 1219
2 1016 7074 1071 tOB4 1097 1H0 1123 1738 1749 N62 1175 1188 1201 �1214
3 1013 1034 1092 1088 1702 1715 H28 1141 1154 1767 1180 1183 1206 1219
4� 1024 1038 1059 1H7 1114 1127 1140 1153 1788 1178 1192 1205 1218 1231
5 1078 1043 1057 1078 7136 1133 1146 1159 1772 NB5 1188 1211 1224 1237 year yeer
K-5 TOT �6208 .6275 8381 8508 8613 6675 8753 -6831 6909 6987 � 7085� 7743 7221 7299 5 0
ercen m
Pupl'Gein 67 118 N5� 107 62 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78
LE . -5� O TIONS � � � � ��
3E.8 :8ased on 6.Yeei Histo ` � -
GRADE 70/17 11I12 12/73 13174 14H6 15116 16ItY 17/1B i8N9 19I20 20Y27 27M22 22f23. 23-24
1 1086 1050 1061 1072 1083 1094 1705 1118 N27 7138 1148 1780 1171 1782
2 1076 1074 1058 1089 7D80 1091 H02 1113 1724 1135 1146 1157 N68 1179
3 1013 1031 1089 7073 iD84 f095 NO6 1117 1128 7139 1750 1181 1172 1183
4 1024 1048 1088 1125 1708 1119 1130 1141 1152 1163 1774 NBS 1796 1207
5 1079 1042 1087 7085 N43 7127 1138 N49 1180 7771 1182 1193 1204 1215 year yeer
K-5 TOT 6208 fi287 6373 8488 6552 8591 8657 6723 B7B9 8855 8821 8887� 7053 7119
ercen
Pu 1 Gain 59 108 93 88 39 88 66 68 68 68 68 66 86
�__'BPROJE � . . . . .. �
3E.13A ����Basedon&rth'Retes'&43VearHist�����
ACNAL PR PR PROJ � PR J PR J PROJ PROJ PROJ ROJ RO PROJ �PROJ
GRADE 10111 11112 12113 13114 14H5 15116 16fl7 17/18 18/1B 19/20 2W21 21122 22123 2324
1 1066 1063' f087 1088 1112 1154
2 1016 1074 1071 1075 1078 1119 1762
3 f013 f034 1092 1089 1093 1094 1138 1180
4 1024 f038 1059 1117 1114 1118 1119 N62 1205
5 f079 1043 f057 1078 1138 1133 1137 1137 1781 1224 yeer
K-5 TOT 6208 6288 8360 B/B5 6831
ercen m
Pu 'I:Gein 58 85 f25 148 �
T E -5 -
3E.6A BaseAdi�.BiMRatea'86.YeetHisl ��__.�
� C Al �VROJ PR -PROJ PR J P J OJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10/11 77/12. . 12A3 13A4 14115 75H6 76717 17118 18119 19/20 20@7 21@2 22123 23,24
0 0 4 0
7 1086 1050 1054 1054 1098 1141
2 1016 1074 1058 1082 1083 1706 1149
3 1013 1011 1088 1073 1077 1078 N21 1164 -
4 1024 1048 1088 1125 1100 1H2 1713 1157 1199
5 ]079 1042 1087 1085 11/3 1727 1137 1131 1175 1218 yeef
K-5 TOT 8208 8280 8349 5 8580 -
ercen n
Pupl'Gain 52 88 108 133
P710-11 Pege 7 OctoEer 2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT.PROJECTIONS-October 2010
TABLE MIDOLESCHOOLPRQIECTIONS' �: ��
�3M3.13 Basedon�43YeerHis �
r :___-_______ . - .
AC'NAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ � ;�PRQ1 � � PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ �
� GRADE 10/11 77/12 �7?113 13N4 14115 15/16 1&17 � 17/18 iBHB 1920 2021 21122 2?!23 2&24'
8 7047 7090 7053 1087 1089 N46 .1143 7166 1769 7182 1195 7208� 1221 7234
7 1080 7057 1106 iD70 1084 1105 1182 7180 1773 7186 7198 � 7212 1225 1238
B 7172 7074 1071 1120 1084 1097 7178 1178 1174 7187 7200 1273 1228 7238 Byear 13year
8-8 TOT 3213 3221 3231 3257 3258 3348 3425 3482 3518 3555 3594 3833 3872 3711 271 498
Percent W Gein D.24% 0.30% 0.81% (�.�3)% 2.85% 2.2896 1.BB% 0,67% 7.11% 1:10% 1.08% 1.07% 1.Ofi%
Pu il Gein 8 10 28 1 93 76 68 23 39 39 39 39 � 38
TABLE MIDOLE�SCHOOL PROJECilONS���.�� �� .
. _. ._ .. ._. . .. _ . . . _. . �
_
3MS.8 Baaetl'unBY�rHisftiry�...�:' - �
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQ!
GRADE � 70/17. � 11112 12/13�. 13114 � 14A5 15I76 16117 17/18 18N9 18/20 20/21 21/22 22@3 2&24
8 1041 1079 1043 1087 7085 1143 7127 11SB 1749 1160 1171 1162 1183 1204
�7. 1080 1058� �1098 1080 7084 1102 1780 7144 1755 1166 1177 NBB 7189 1210
�8' IN2 1073� 1071 7110 7073 1D97 1N5 �1174 1157 1i68 1178 N90 1201 . 7212 By�r ' 1Syem
6-BTOT 3213 3211 3210 � 3238 3242 3343 3403 3458 3482 3495 ��3528 �3581 3594 3627 �� 190 j 414
PercentolGein. (0.07)% -.01% .Bt% .iB%� 3.10%� 1.80% 1�.58% :t7% .95% :94% .94% .B3% .92%
Pu il Gein 2 0 28 8 701 80 53 6 33 33 33 33 33
TABLE MIDDLESCHOOLPROJEC110NSi,,-.. .,,
3MS.13A BasedonBirtARefes�&�13Year.Hid ��
ACTUAL PROJ� PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10/11 11712 12/13. . 13/14 74115 15/16 18/17 17/18 18/19 19Yt0 20Y21 21122 22123.. 23-24 '
B f041 1090 1053 f087 f089 7146- �1143 1147 1148 1192 1234
7 1080 1057 1708 f070 1084' 1105 �7162 1180 7164 1764 1208 1251 � �
�B A172 _ 1074� 1071 .1720 1084 f097 1N8 1178 1774 7777 1178� 1222 7285 � � e year 10 yem
B--B TOT 3213 3221 3231 ' 5257 3258 3348 3425 3483 3485 3533 �3821 217 � �408
PerCentoF6ein 024%� 0.30% O.B7% (0.03)% 2.85% 2.2890 7.71% 0.08% 7:38% � 2.4796 �
Pu il Gein B 10 26 1 93 76 59 2 48 87
TABLE MIDOLE SCHOOC PROJECTIONS:�����
_ .
3MS.BA BesedonBMHRatesB'BYeer:His1�� . � .. _ __ _
ACTUAL PROJ - PROJ PROJ� PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ-
.GRADE 70/17 11/12 12A3 13114 1M75 15/i6 78117 17AB 18119 19/20 20@7 21@2 22l23 23-24.
8 7047 1079 1043 1087 1085 1743 H27 7731 1132 7176 7278
7 7060 f058 1098 1060 1084 1102 1180 1144 1748 7148 1792 1235
8 1712 1073 1071 1710 1073 1097 1116 1174 N57 N61 1162 . 7206 . 1248 6 year 10 year
8-8 TOT 3213 3211 3210 3238 3242 3343 3403 3449 3437 3485 3573 190 I 360
Percent W Gein (0.07)% (�.01)% 0.81% �.18% 3.10% 1.80% 1.35% (0.34)% 1.40% 2.50%
Pu 7 Gein 2 (0� 28 6 101 60 46 �12) 48 87
pry"7411 � PageB ' . . Ocioher20f0
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PRWEC710NS-October 2010
TABLE SR:�HIGH PROJECTIONS��: :�'
3SH.13 Besedon��.73YeetHistay:. .- I � -
ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ PHOJ PROJ. PROJ . PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE f0/11 17H2 �72173 13f14 14H5 15H6� 76H7 17118 � iB118 1B@0 20@7 21/22 22@3 2&24
9 1221 1405 7387 7384 1413 1377 1390 1412, 1469 1467 � -1480� 1493 �1506 1518
70 1238 1151 7335 1297 7295 7343 1307 1321 7342 7400 1397 1410 1423 1436
11 7258 1147 7081 1245 1207 7204 1253 1218 1230 1251 1309 1306 1318 1332
72_ 1344 7798 1087 1000 1784. 1146 1143 7192 1158 1170 1191 1249 1246 1259 By�r � 13 yeer
8-12 TOT 5061 4901 4860 4906 5098 5070 5093 5141 5197 5287 5377 5457 5484 5548 32 � 485
PercentofGein (3.18)% (7.05)% 1.17% 3.B1Ye (0.56)% 0.46% 0.93% 7.10% - 1.73% 1.69% 1.57% 0.87% O.BS%
Pup1��Gein (160) (51 57 792 (28) 24 47 56 80 88 81 36 52
TABLE SR:HIGHPROJECTIONS:�-� �.
3SH.8 . BesedonBYearHistory2��� ��
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ �PROJ � PR0.1 PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ
.GRADE 70/11 11A2 12/13 73/14 14115 i5116 16H7 17l18 18l19 18/20 �2027 27/22 22123 2b24
9 1221 1328 1289 7287 1328 1289 1313 1332 1390 1374 7385 7398 7407 1418
10 1238 1228 1335 1297 1285 1333 1296 1321 1339 1397 1381 1392 1403 7474
11 1258 7201 1191 1299 12fi0 1258 1296 7260 1284 1302 1360 1344 1355 1368
12 1344 1259 1209 1193 1300 1261 1259 1288 1281 1285 7303 1382 7345 1356 8 year ' 13 yeer
9-12 TOT 5081 5017 5019 5075 5180 5141 5165 5209 5273 5356 5429 5493 5510 5554 104 ; 493
PefCentMGein (0.87)% 0.04% 1.13°/s 2.06Yo (0.75)% 0.47% 0,8896 1.23% 1.60% 1.33% 1.18% 0.31% 0.80%
Pu 'I Gein 44 2 57 105 39 24 44 84 84 71 84 17 44
TABLE � SR:�HIGH PROJECT10N5-� -
35H.13A Based on'�Birth Retes&�:13Year Hisf ��
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10/11 ii/12 12/13 13114 14N5 15/18 18/17 17I1B 18l19 19/20 20l21 21Yt2 22123 23-24
9 1221 7405 1367 1364 1413 1377 1390 1412 1489 1467 7470 1471 1515 7558
10 1238 1751 7335 1297 1295 1343 1307 1321 1342 1400 7397 7407 7402 7445
11 1258 1147 1061 1245 1207 1204 1253 1216 123D 7251 1308 1308 1310 7311
12 1344 7198 7087 1000 1184 1146 1143 1192 1758 1170 1191 1249 7246 1250 6 yeer : 13year
9-12 TOT 5061 4901 4850 4906 5098 5070 5093 5141 5197 5287 5367 5427 5472 5584 32 � 503
PementMGain (3.18)% (1A5)% 1.17% 3.81% (0.58)% 0.48% 0.93% 1.10% 1�.73°h 1.51% 1.11% 0.84% 1.66%
Pu il Gein 160 51 57 192 2B 24 47 56 80 80 60 48 91
TABLE SRaHIGH PROJECTIONS;-i `; -
3SH.BA Besed on BiAh'Rates 66.Yeer Hiato��>��� �� '
ACNAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRAOE 10/11 11A2 12113 13/74 14115 15118 1fi/17 17/1B 18119 19@0 20/21 21Y12 22/23 23•24
9 1221 1328 1288 1287 7328 1288 1313. - 1332 1390 1374 1377 7378� 1422 1485
10 1238 1228 1335 1297 7285 1333 1288 1321 1338 1397 1387 7305 1385 7429
11 1258 7201 7191 1299 � 1280 1258 1298 1280 �12B4 1302 1360 1344 1348 1349
12 1344 ' 1259 1203 1193 1300 1261 1259 1288 1281 7285 7303 7382 1345 1349 6 yeer I 13ye�r
9-12 TOT 5081 5017 5�79 50)5 518� 5141 �5165 5209 5273 5358 5422 .5488� 5500 5587 � ' 104 . 531
'Percent of Gein (0.8�% 0.04% 1.13% 2.08% (075)% 0.47% 0.88% 123% 1.60% 1.79% " O.BB% 0.59% 7.68%
Pu 7 Gein (44 - 2 57 105' 39 24 44 84 84 B4 �47 '32 � 91
pry10-17 . � PagB B Octo6er2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLIMENTP.ROJECTION3-October 2070
TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS'� �
4 BVGRADE�GROUP-:'.'�-:.�-' � � �
KINDERGARTEN
ACTUAL PROJ PRQ1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ VROJ PROJ PR0.1
GRADE 10I11 17/12 12A3 13714 74/15 15l16 16117 17AB 18/19 19l20 2021 21122 22/23 23-24 8 year 13 y�r
E.13 1010 7023 1036 1049 1062 1075 1088 �1101 7714 1127 1140 1153 N86 N79 76 ( 189
E.6 1010 1021 1032 1043 1054 1085 1076 1087 7098 1709 1120 1137 1142 1153 66 � 143
E.13A 1070 1014� 1015 1058 H01 .
� E.6A 7010 7074 1015 1058 1101 �
GRD 7�—GRD 8
ACTUAL PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQI PRQI
GRADE 70A1 11A2 12A3 73l14 14/15 15H6 16N7 17AB 18/1B 18/20 20Y21 21@2 2?/23 23-24 6year 13yeer
E.13 5798 5252 5355 5457 5551 5600 5665 5730 5795 SB60 5925 5990 6055 8120 487 � 822
E.B 5798 5248 5341 5423 5498. 5528 5581 5838 5881 5746 5801 5856 SB11 5988 383 � 768
E:19A 5198 5252 5346 5427 5530
� E8A 5198 5248 5334 5399 5488
ORD B—ORD B
. _ . .. . _ . .. _ . _ . .
ACNAL PROJ 'PROJ� PROJ PROJ PROJ. PROJ PROJ � pROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ.
�GRAOE.� .7Df17 17112 _ 12113� _.13/14 14115 15118 18117 17/1B 18liB 18/20 20I21 �21/22 22/23 23-24 B yeer 13 yeer
MS.13 3213 322T 3231 3267 3258 3348 3425 3492 3516 3555 3594 3893 3872 37H 211 ( 498
M5.8 3273 3211 3210 3238 3242 3343 3403 3458 3482 3495 3528 3581 3594 3627 790 � 414
MS.13A 3213 3221 3237 3257 325fi 3348 3425 3483 3485 3533 3621
MS.BA 3213 3211 3210 3236 3242 3343 3403 3449 3437 3485 3573
GRD 8—GRO 12
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQ1 PROJ , PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 10A1 17fl2 72113. 13114 14N5 15l16, 7&17 17/1B� 18A9 18@0 20121 21C22 22/23� 23-24 �8yeer i 13yeer.
SH.13 5087 �4907 4850 I808 5098 5070 5093 5141 5197 5287 - 5377 5457- 5484 6546 - 3Y. � 485
3H.8� 5067 SOfY 5018 5075 5180 5141 �5185 -5208 5273 5358� 5428 �5493 �5510 5554 �104 I 493
SH.13A 5081 4901 4850 4806 5098 5070 5093 5141 . 5197 5287 5367 5027 5472 5584 32 , 503
SH.BA 5087 5017 5018 5075 5180 5141 5185 5208 5273 �5358 5422 5488 5500 5582 � 704 � 531
DISTRICT TOTALS
ACNAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQI
GRADE 10/11 11fl2 �12I73 13l74 14H5 15/76 1W17 17A8 18NB 19/20 20@1 21/22 2223 23-24 Byeer i 73year
3.13 74482� - 14397 � 14471 74869 74967 15093 15271 15465 75622 75828 76036 76234 16387 16556 789 : 2074
3.8 '74482� 14494 74802 74778 74975 75075 75225 75388 15524 75708 75878 16047 18757 76300 743 ; 1818
3.13A � 14482 14388 74441 14848 14885 �
3.BA 14482 14487 14578 74788 15013
�ia�� a��o. oaon��zoio
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2010
TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS
5 BY GRADE GROUP
TWaI = October 1 Aetuel Count AND Projecled Cants Prj 3.13- 13 VEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average ICdg Increase
Diff = Number Pmjeclion is undm(-)w rnsr Actual Prj 3.8 - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Averege Kdg Increese
% = Percent Projection is untler(-)or rner Acluel Prj 3.73A 13 VEAR HISTORY & IGng Cty Birlh Retes
Prj 3.BA- 8 YE4R HISTORY 8 King Cry Birih Retes
Gredes 199&99 1999-UO 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
K•5 Totel Diif % TMaI DiN % Tofel Ditf % Total Diff % Totel Diff %
ACTUAL 5837 wo� �ooc 5856 mc woc 5844 xa wa 5814 na wa 5747 �ooc woc
Prj3E.73 604B 212 3.83% 5778 (78) (0.54)% 5871 (33) 3.15% 5827 (87) (1.47)% 5723 (1B) (0.31)%
Prj3E.6 8028 189 3.24% 5735 (721) (0.88)% 5884 (180) 2.74% SB02 (112) (1.89)% 5735 (6) (0.1D)%
Prj3E.13A 5938 99 1.70% 5811 (45) (2.64�% 5918 75 1.51% SB39 (75) (127)% 5743 2 �.03%
P'3E.BA 5917 80 1.37% 5785 71 2.93)% 5895 51 1.15% SB31 83) 1.40% 5776 35 0.67%
GrBAes 199&99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
8-8 Totel Dift % Totel Oiff % Tofel Diff % Total Difl % Totel Diff %
ACTUAI 2860 �ooc mc 2970 wa na 2980 wa mc 3049 wa na 3151 �oot na
Prj3E.13 29f0 50 1.75% 2927 (43) (2.64)% 3023 (BO) (2.62j% 3025 (24) (0.7B)% 3185 34 1.08%
P�3E.8 2878 18 0.63% 2895 (75) (2.70)% 3009 (75) (2.48)% 3011 (36) (1.25)% 3792 41 1.30%
Prj 3E.13A 2910 50 7.75% 2927 (43) (2.64)% 3023 (80) (2.82)% 3025 (24) (0.79)% 3185 34 7.08%
P'3E.BA 2878 iB 0.83% 2895 75 2.70% 3009 (75 2.48% 3011 (38) 1.25% 3182 41 7.30%
Gredes 199&99 1899-00 2000-01 2007-02 2002-03
8-12 Total DiH % Totel Dift % Total OiN % Totel DiH % TofEl Dift %
ACTUAL 4245 wa wa 4225 wa wa 4311 wa �ooc 4498 xa �ooc 4535 na wa
P�3E.13 4110 (735) (3.18)% 43ai 78 2.74% 4369 5B (0.32)% 4455 (43) (0.98)% 4577 42 O.B3%
Pry3E.8 4103 (142) (3.35)% 4313 88 7.51% 4394 83 (1.49)95 4476 (22) (0.49)% 4594 59 7.30%
P�3E.73A 4110 (135) (3.18)% 4301 78 2.74% 4369 5B (0.32)% 4455 (43) (0.88)% 4577 42 0.93°/.
P'3E.BA 4103 142 3.35 Ye 4313 88 1.51% 4394 83 1.49% 4476 (22) 0.49% 4594 59 1.30%
199&99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03
GreCes Totel DiR % Tolel Diff % Totel DiN % Totel Diff % Tofel Difl %
CNAL 12842 �ooc mc 13051 wa wa 13135 wa mc 13481 wa �ooc 13427 �ooc wa
P�3E.73 13089 127 0.9895 13008 (45) (0.34J% 13203 88 (D.30)96 13307 (154) 0.97°h 73485 58 0.43%
Pr�9E.8 13007 65 0.5�% 12943 (108) (0.83j% 73087 �6B) (O.B2)°/ 13289 (172) 0.50% 13521 84 0.70%
Prj 3E.13A 12958 14 0.11% t3038 (72) (0.09j% 13311 176 (1.44)% 13318 (142) 0.10% 73505 7B 0.58%
P'3E.BA 12888 (44) (0.34 Ya 72883 58 0.44% 13298 163 1.B9% 13378 (743) (0.33 Na 13582 135 1.07%
pry10-17 Pege 11 OGtober 2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PRW ECTIONS-October 2010
TABLE PROJECTIONCOMPARISONS
5 BY GRADE GROUP Continu
Totel = Octo�er 1 Actuel Count AND ProJected Counts Prj 3.13- 73 YEAR HISTORV 8 Ueing Averege Kdg Increase
DiH = Number ProjecNon is under(-)or overActuel P�3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Uaing A�xrage Ktlg Increase
% = Pertent Piojectlm is under(-)or wer Actual Pry 3.73A 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty BirN Retes
Pry S.BA- 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 IGng Cty Birth Retes
Gredes 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2008-07 2007-08
K-5 Tofal Dil( % Tofel �iR X Totel Dilt % TWaI DiH % Total Ditt %
ACTUAL 5774 za na 5735 �ooc woc 5867 �ou wx 6033 wa woc 6142 wa woc
PrJ3E.13 5655 (119) (2.08)% 5761 28 (0.49)% 5750 (137) (2.33)% 5871 (162) (2.89)% BOBS (57) (O.B3)%
Prj 3E.6 5862 (112) (1.94)% 5821 88 (0.34)% 5785 (92) (1.58)% 5821 (112) (1.88)% 6138 (4) (0.07)%
Prj3E.73A 5605 (169) (2.93)% 5708 (28) (1.24)% 5750 (137) (2.33)% 5869 (784j (2.72)46 6059 (83) (1.35)%
Pr 3EBA 5631 143 2.48% 5756 21 O.Bt % 5784 103 1.76% 5912 721 2.01 % 8094 48 0.78%
Gretles 2003-04 2004-05 2UO3-04 2008-07 2007-08
8-8 Tot� Uiff % Totel DiH % Total DiN % Total DiH % Totel Diff %
ACNAL 3294 woc �oa 3274 mc na 3189 wa �ooc 3144 xa mc 3097 wa wx
PIj3E.13 3214 (BO) (2.43)% 3285 21 (8.88J% 3132 (3n (1.17)% 3131 (13) (O.d1)% 3107 10 0.32%
Pry'3E.6 3218 (78) (2.37�% 3311 37 (6.06)% 3137 (32) (7.01)% 3146 2 0.08% 3116 79 0.87%
Prj3E.t3A 3214 (80) (2.43�% 3295 21 (8.88)% 3132 (37) (1.77J% 3131 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32%
Pr'3E.BA 3216 78 2.37% 3317 37 B.OB% 3137 32 7.01 56 3148 2 0.08% 3176 19 0.81%
Gratles 2003-04 2004-05 2003-04 2006-07 2007-08
9-12 Totel Dilf % Tofal DiN % TWeI Diff % Totel DiH % TMeI Diff %
ACTUAL 4634 wp wu 4663 woc woc 5032 wa xa 5241 wa za 5320 wot no�
Prj3E.13 4630 (q) (O.OB)% 4783 120 5.90% 4898 (134) (2.88)% 5085 (156) (2.BB)% 5190 (130) (2.44)%
Pfj3E.8 4839 5 0.11% 4769 708 3.89% 4880 (152) (3.02)% 5086 (155) (2.86)% 5192 (128) (2,q7)°k
Ptj3E.13A 4830 (4) (0.08)% 4783 120 5.90% 4898 (134) (2.88)% 5085 (158) (2.98)% 518D (730) (2.44)%
P'3E.8A 4838 5 0.11% 4789 708 3.88% 4880 152 9.02 Yo 5086 155 2.98% 5182 128 2.47 %
1 2003-04 2004-05 2003-04 2008-07 2007-08
Gredes TMeI DiH 96 Total DiH % Tdel Dift % Tolel Diff % Totsl DiN %
ACTUAL 13702 mc �ooc 13872 woc wo� 13872 �aot wa 14q18 woc wo� 7q559 wot na
Pfj3E.13 13498 (203) (7.48)% 13839 767 1.22% 13499 (773) (1.27)% 14087 (337) (2.30)% 14382 (177) (1.22)%
Pry'3E.6 13517 (185) (1.35)% 13907 228 1.87% 13542 (13D) (O.BS)% 14153 (265) (1.84)% 74446 (113) (0.78J%
Prj3E.13A 73449 (253) (1.85)% 73787 115 D.B4% 13447 (225) (1.85)% 14085 (333) (2.31)95 74356 (203) (1.38)%
P'3E.6A 13486 (216 1.58% 73836 164 1.20% t3510 (162 1.18)% 74744 (274) 1.90% 74402 157) (1.08J%
pry10.11 Pt�e 12 October 2010
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2010
TABLE PROJEC710N COMPARISONS
5 BY GRADE GROUP Continue�
TMaI = October 1 Actuel CountAND Projecled Counte P�3.13- 73 YEAR HISTORY 3 Usirn�Averege Kdg Increase
OiH = Numher Projection is uiMerl-)a�r Actuel Pry 3.6 - B YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Averege Kdg Increese
% = Percent Prqeclion is under(-)a wer Actual Pry 3.13A 13 VEAR HISTORY 6 IGng Cty Birth Retes
Prj 3.6A- 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 Kirg Cy BiAh ReMs
Gratles 2008-09 2008-10 2010.11 A�erega A�erege Historicel Dete is grouped by
K-5 Tofal Diff % Tolal DiN % Tolel Diff % Diff % K-5,8-8,9-12 erticuletion
ACTUAL 8198 na wa 6159 wa �oa 6208 wa wa wa za pattem.
Prj3E.13 6179 (19) (�.31)% 6254 95 1.54% 6282 74 1.19% (22) (0.10)%
P�j 3E.8 8237 38 0.63% 6284 135 2.1B% 6323 115 7.85% (16) 0.10% Fvticuletion patlern has no
PrJ3E.13A 8129 (89) (1.11)% 6237 7B 1.27% 8252 44 0.71% (31) (0.71)% numeriCimpactonefficecy
Prj 3E.BA 6772 (26) (0,42)% 6264 105 1.70% 6268 61 0.98% (17) (0.49 R6 of projection mo0els.
Grades 2008-09 2009-10 2070-71 Averege A�.erege
6-8 Tolal Ditt % Totsl DiH % Tofal Drfl % Diff %
ACTUAL 3206 wa wa 3196 wa na 3213 wa na wa na
Pfj3E.i3 3178 (27) (0.84)% 3242 46 1.44% 3234 21 0.65% (7) (1.05)%
Prj3E.8 3195 (11) (0.34)% 3243 47 1.47% 3238 23 0.72% (9) (0.85)%
Prj3E.13A 3179 (27) (O.B4)% 3242 48 1.44% 3234 21 0.85% (7) (tA5)%
Prj3E.6A 3195 (11) (0.34)% 3243 47 1.47% 3238 23 0.72% 9) �0.85)%
Gretlea 2008-08 200940 2010•11 Average Averepe
9-12 Totel DiN % Tdel D'Af % ToFel DiH % DiR %
ACTUAL 5299 na wa 5234 na wa 5067 wa za wa wa
Prj 3E.13 5129 (170) (321)% 5074 (160) (3.08)% 4921 (140) (2.77)% (47) (0.68)%
Prj 3E.6 5755 (144) (2.72)% 5128 (106) (2.03)% 5027 (34) (0.87)% (31) (0.75)%
Prj 3E.13A 5729 (170) (3.21)% 5074 (160) (3.08)% 4921 (140) (2.77)% (47) (0.68)%
Prj3E.6A 5155 (144) (2.72)% 5129 (f05) (2.01)% 5027 (34) (0.67)% (31) (0.75)%
qp 2008-09 20D9-10 2010-71 A�erege Averege
Grades Total DiH % Total DiH % Totel Diff % DiH %
ACTUAL 14703 wa �ooc 14589 �ooc wa 14482 wa wa wa wa
Prj3E.13 14487 (216) (1.47)9b 14570 (19) (0.13)% 14437 (45) (0.37)% (58) (0.29)%
PrJ 3E.6 14587 (116) (0.79)45 14665 76 0.52% 14588 104 0.72% (36) (0.15)%
Pry'3E.73A 14437 (266) (1.81)% 14553 (36) (0.25)% 14407 (75) (0.52J% (69) (0.60)%
Prj3E.8A 14522 (1B7) (1.23)% 14636 47 0.32% 14532 50 0.35% (38) (0.45)%
prj10.11 Page 13 Ocfu6er 2010
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN
Enrollment Projections
8uildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2071
BASE DATA-BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student 6eireraGon FacW�s
ASSUMPTIONS: 2010 Aubum Single Mufti-
1 Uses Build Out EsUmates rece(ved fiom developeis. Factora Famity Family
2 Student Generatlon FacM�s are updated Aubum data/or 2011 as allowed per King County Ordinanca Elementary 0.3130 0.1240
1 Takes area lebeled Lakeland Pio/ects @ 80%and dNldea aaoss 2011-16 Middle School 0.1540 0.0560
4 Takes aiea labeled Kersey ProJect �50%dNkles across 4011-2016 Senior High 0.1650 0.0519
5 Takes aiea labeled Brldges and other Lea Hlll area developments and p�o/ects across 2011-2017 Tofel 0.6320 02319
8 fncludes known develo ments In N.Aubum and other non-Lea Hfll and noMLakeland devel meMs see Develo ment Orowth
Table Aubum School Dis
1 Deve ment 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Leke�and/Kersey Single Famity 50 60 70 80 80 80 420
Lea Hill Area Single Family 50 85 100 175 200 200 200 1010
Other Sin le Fami Units 35 40 50 65 65 55 45 355
Total Sin le Fami Units 135 185 220 320 345 335 245 1785
Pro'eded Pu ils:
Elementery Pupils K-5 42 58 69 100 108 105 77 559
Mid School Pupils 6-6 21 28 34 49 53 52 38 275
Sr.High Pupils 9-12 22 31 36 53 57 55 40 295
Total K-72 85 117 139 202 218 212 155 1128
Muki Famil Unfls 25 75 75 100 100 0 0 375
Total Multi Famiy Units 25 75 75 100 100 0 0 375
Pro'etted Pu ils:
Elementary Pupils K5 3 9 9 12 72 0 0 44
Mid Schaol Pupils 6-8 1 4 4 6 6 0 0 11
Sr.High Pupils 9-12 1 4 4 5 5 0 0 25
Total K-12 6 17 17 23 23 0 0 80
Total Housin Units 160 260 285 420 445 335 245 2160
Elementery Pupils K-5 45 67 78 113 120 105 77 805
Mid School Pupils 6-8 22 33 38 55 59 52 38 286
Sr. High Pupils &12 24 34 40 58 62 55 40 314
Total K-12 91 134 156 225 241 212 155 1215
Cumulative Pro ecdon 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-76 201&17
Elementery-Grades K 5 45 113 191 303 424 529 605
Mid School-Gredes 6-S 22 55 93 148 2D7 258 296
Senior High-Grades 9-12 24 58 96 156 218 274 314
Total 97 228 982 607 849 1060 1216
Builtlouts March 11 +ND3.6 eve p�o�ections 45
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2071
TABLE New Projects-Annual New Pupils Added 8 Dfstributed
2 b Grede Level
6 Year Percent of average
GRADE Averege Pupils by Grede 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2073-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
Enroil. &Level
KDG 989 6.83% 1010 6 15 26 41 56 72 83
1 1014 7.01% 1066 6 16 27 43 59 74 85
2 1004 6.93% 42.78% 1016 6 16 26 42 59 74 84
3 1014 7.01% 1013 6 16 27 43 59 74 85
4 1031 7.12% 1024 6 16 27 43 60 76 87
5 1053 7.28% 7079 7 16 28 44 62 77 88
6 1041 7.19% 1041 7 16 27 44 61 76 87
7 1053 7.28% 27.9196 1060 7 16 28 44 62 77 88
8 1077 7A4% 1tt2 7 17 28 45 63 79 90
9 1302 6.99% 1221 8 20 34 55 76 95 109
10 1335 9.22% 36.91% t238 8 21 35 56 76 98 112
11 1295 8.94% 1268 8 20 34 54 76 95 109
12 1267 8.76% 1344 8 20 33 53 74 93 106
Totals 14473 100.00°� Total 14482 91 225 382 607 849 1060 1215
TABLE 6 year Historical Dafa
9 Avera e Enrollment and Percenta e Dlstributed b Grade Level
Grade os-os os-m o7-oa os-0e os-�o to-i� e rAve °�
KDG 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 988.67 6.63%
1 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1014.00 7.01%
2 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1D16 1003.67 6.93°k
3 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 1014.00 7.01°k
4 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1031.00 7.12%
5 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1053.17 728%
6 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1041.00 7.19%
7 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1053.00 7.28%
8 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1076.83 7.44%
9 1379 7372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1307.50 8.99%
10 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1334.50 922%
11 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1256 1294.50 8.94%
12 1088 1147 1283 1352 141D 1344 1267.33 8.76°�
Totals 14088 14418 14559 14703 14589 14482 14473.17 100.00°k
� 46 of chenge 2.34% 0.98% 0.99% -0.78% -0.73%
change+/- 330 141 744 -114 -107
Buildouts Merch 11+ND3.fi eve projeclions 46
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projectlons-March 2017
TABLE 4 New Projects-Pupll Projecdon Cumulative
ND 3.13 b Grade Level U deted March 2071
Uses a 'cohoR surv)va!' GRADE 2010-11 2011-72 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
model assuming 100%of Actual Pro ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'eded Pro ected Pro'ected Pro'eded
prevlousyearnew KDG 7010 1029 1051 1075 1103 1133 1160 1184
enrollees move to the next 1 1066 1070 1092 1116 1145 1175 1203 1226
gradeleveL 2 1016 to8o t087 t110 tt39 1169 1796 t22o
3 1013 1041 1108 1116 1145 1175 7203 1228
Kindergarten calculates 4 7024 1044 1075 1144 1157 1187 1216 7240
previous years number plus 5 1079 1049 1073 1106 1180 1195 1223 t247
K-5 8208 6313 6486 6667 8889 7033 7201 7344
Currentgeneration based on 6 7041 1096 1070 7095 1132 1207 1220 1244
%oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1060 1064 1122 1098 1128 1167 1240 1248
factoruses 100°� COhort 8 1112 1081 1088 1146 1129 1160 1198 1267
survival, based on 6 year GR 6-B 3213 3241 3280 3340 3389 3534 3657 3759
hiStory. 9 1221 1413 1387 1399 1467 1453 1486 1521
10 7238 1160 1356 1332 1351 1421 1405 1433
11 1258 1155 1081 1279 1261 1280 1347 1325
12 1344 1205 1107 1034 1237 1220 1236 1298
GR 9-12 5061 4934 4931 5044 5316 5374 5474 5577
Toial 14482 14488 14697 15051 15574 15942 16331 16680
%oicharge 0.04% 1.44% 2.41°� 3.47% 2.36°,6 2.44% 2.13%
cha�e+!- 8 209 354 523 368 389 348
TABLE 5 New Projects-Pupil ProJecUon Cumulative
ND 3.6 b Grade Level U dated Maroh 2017
Uses a cohorisurvival' GRADE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
model assumfng 100%of Adual Pro'ected Projected Projected Pro'ecfed Pro'ected Pro'eded Projected Pro'ected Pro'ected
previous year new KDG 1010 1027 1047 1089 1095 1123 1148 1170 1183 1197
enro//ees move to the next 1 1066 1056 1077 1099 1125 1153 1179 1201 1215 1228
grade leve% 2 1016 1081 1074 1095 1122 1150 1176 1797 1211 1225
3 1013 1038 1105 1100 1127 1155 1180 1202 1216 1230
Kindergarten calculates 4 1024 1055 1082 1152 1152 1180 1206 1228 1242 1256
previous years number plus 5 1079 1049 1083 1113 1187 1189 1215 1237 1251 1265
K-5 6208 6305 6468 6627 6809 6949 7104 7236 7318 7401
Currentgenera6on based on 6 1041 1086 1059 1094 1129 1204 1203 1228 1240 1254
% oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1060 1065 1113 7088 1128 1164 1238 1233 1247 1281
factoruses 100%cohort B 1712 1080 1088 1138 1118 1160 1194 1264 1276 1293
survival, based on 6 year GR 6-B 3213 3231 3260 3320 3375 3529 3635 3722 3764 3807
history. 9 1221 1336 1310 1322 1380 1366 1409 1441 1457 1474
10 1238 1237 1356 1332 1351 1411 1394 1433 1449 1465
11 1258 7209 7272 1333 1314 1334 7391 1368 1384 1400
12 7344 1267 1222 1226 1353 1336 7352 1404 1420 7438
GR 9-12 5061 5050 5t00 5213 5398 5446 5546 5646 5710 5775
Total tA482 14586 14828 15160 15582 15924 16266 16604 16792 16983
%otchenge 0.71% 1.86°h 224°,6 2.78°h 2.19% 22T% 1.95% 1.14% 7.13%
cha e+I- 104 242 332 422 342 382 316 188 191
BuiMouts March 11 +ND3.6 ave projections 47
Buildout Data for Enrollment ProjecHons-March 2011
TABLE 8 New Developmenta•Pupil ProjecBon Cumulative
N09.18A b Orede Level U eted Merch 2017
USes a 'cOhO►t SUrvfvel' GRADE 2010.11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
model essuming 100%of Actual Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected
previousyeainew KDG 1010 1020 1030 1084 1143
enrollees move to the next 1 1066 1070 1083 1095 1154 1214
g►8delevel. 2 1016 1080 1087 1101 7118 1178 1236
3 1013 1041 1108 1116 1136 1153 1212 1265
Kindergarten calculates 4 1024 1044 1075 1144 1157 1178 1194 1249
birth rate average plus 5 1079 1D49 1073 1106 1180 1195 1214 1226
6208 8304 6455 6846 6887 5918 4855 3740
Currentgeneration based on 6 1041 1096 1070 1095 7132 1207 1220 1235
°� oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1060 1064 1722 7098 1128 1167 1240 1248
factoruses 100°�cohort 8 7112 1081 1088 1148 1129 1180 1198 1267
survival, based on 6 year 3213 3241 3280 3340 3389 3534 3657 3749
hiStOry. 8 1221 1413 1387 1399 1487 1453 1488 1521
10 1238 1760 1356 1332 1351 1421 1405 1433
11 1258 1755 1081 1279 1281 1280 7347 1325 �
12 1344 1205 1107 1034 1237 1220 1236 1288
5061 4934 4931 5044 5316 5374 5474 5577
Total 14482 14479 14666 15030 15592
%ofcha�ge -0.02% t29% 2.48% 3.74%
change•/- � 187 364 562
TABLE 7 New Projects-Pupil Projecdon CumulaWe
ND 9.sA b Grede Level U dated March 2011
Uses a 'cohortsurvlval' GRADE 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18
mode/assuming 100%Of Actual Proected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'eded Proected Proected Pro'eded
prevlous year new KDG 1010 1020 1030 1084 1143
enrol(ees move to the next 1 1086 1056 1069 1081 1141 1200
grade level. 2 1016 1081 1074 1088 1105 1165 1223
3 1D13 1038 1105 1100 1120 1137 1196 1249
Kindergarten calculates 4 1024 1055 1082 1152 1152 1173 1189 1243
biRh rete average plus 5 1079 1049 1083 1713 1187 1189 120B 1220
6208 6298 6444 6818 6846
Currentgeneration based on 6 1041 1086 1059 1094 1129 1204 1203 1218
°� oftotalenrollment. Other 7 7060 t065 1113 1088 1128 1164 1238 1233
factoruses 100°iG cohort 8 1112 1080 1088 1138 1118 1160 1194 1264
survival, based on 6 year 3213 3231 3260 3320 3375 3b29 3635 3715
history. 9 1221 1336 1310 1322 1380 1366 1409 1441
10 7238 1237 1356 1332 1351 1411 1394 1433
11 1258 1209 1212 1333 1314 1334 1391 1368
12 7344 1267 1222 1226 1353 1336 1352 1404
5081 5050 5100 5213 5398 5446 5548 5848
Total 14482 14578 14803 15151 15820
%o change 0.87 1.54% 2.35 3.10%
cha�e+l-
Buildouts March 11+ND3.8 eve proJections 48
Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey
Aubum School,District
Development Growth since 1h/05
Mareh,2011
SINGLE FAMILY
- - ---
�� - � 0� � UITBD � O E, - ."--•Studant��,Generalion;Fadors ��:�,.��-
Development Name �- - -.
Parcels Occu nc Occu ied Elem Middle HS Total Elemi� �Middle� iH5 I +T.otal:�
Alder Meadows 30 30 0 2 6 5 13 0.067 0.200 0.167 0.433
As en Meadows 21 21 0 10 9 5 24 0.476 0.429 0.238 1.143
Aubum Place 14 14 0 70 3 1 14 0.714 0.214 0.077 1.000
Cembrid e Pointe . 26 28 0 13 4 6 23 0.500 0.154 0231 0.865
Dewson HOIs 6 6 0 7 3 8 18 1.167 0.500 1.333 3.000
HezelPerk. 15 15 0 22 14 17 47 1.467 0.933 0.733 3:133
Keili Meadows B 8 0 3 0 7 4 0.375 0.000 0.125 0.500
Lakeland:The Reserve 80 80 0 33 74 11 56 0.413 0.175 0.138 0.725
Lakeland:Verona South 400 400 0 99 42 67 206 0248 0.105 0:188 0:520
Lakelandi Verona North_ 781 187 0: 47 21 ' 1& 84 0.260 0.118 0.088 0.464
Little Fields B 8 0 7 1 3 5 0.125 0.125 0.375 0.625
Marchinl Meadows 83 83 0 38 76 17 •71 0.458 0.193 0.205 0.655
PeGflc View-Meadows 76 78 D 78 16 11 45 0231 0205 0.141 0.577
Rider Rim 11 11 0 7 4 2 13 0.636 0.364 0.182 7.182
Sera Monte 33 33 0 9 3 1 13 0.273 0.091 0.030 0.394
Waehin ton Natlonal, Div 1 42 42 0 5 4 6 15 0.119 0.085 0.143 0:357
Totals 1036 0 324 160 171 655 10:313 . ._ !0.154 �OS786 i' 0:832
�Develo ments:UnderConstrucUon
Development Name Units/ Current To Be � stuaeni,�enerebon�Feaors . �: `+
Parcels Occu anc Occu led Elem Middle HS Total Elem' 1 :Middle} ;`a S. ; Total°
BeaverMeadows 60 30 30 4 5 4 13 9 5 5 19
Greemfew 16 6 10 1 1 1 3 3 2 2 6
Lakelend: Pinnecle Eslates 76 33 43 7 2 1 10 13 7 7 27
Lakeland:Vista Hei hts 125 117 8 30 11 6 47 3 1 1 5
TreilRun 169 135 34 11 8 7 . 26 11 5 6 21
Rive ointe 118 100 16 25 73 21 59 6 3 3 11
ToTals 564 427 143 78 40 40 158 : 45. ? 22' I 24 I _ `:90i _
awzo��
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1!7/05
March,2011
2071 and u Pro'ected with Plats Submitted
DevelopmenfName Unitsl Current TOB@ ;; `lSiudeMiGenerelloniFadors :.""
Parcels Occu anc Occu ied ;EIemL Middle r.sHS; , Totali:
Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 10 5 5 20
Anderson Acres 74 0 14 4 2 2 9
Backbone Rid e 7 0 7 2 1 1 4
Brendon Meadows 55 0 55 17 8 9 35
Brsndon Place 78 0 . 78 24 12 13 49
Bdd es 386 0 386 121 80 64 244
Bddle Estetes 18 0 �18 6 3 3 11
Cam-West 89 0 99 31 15 16 63 .
Cerrin ton Pointe 24 0 24 8 4 4 15
Dal it Dhaliwal Plat 8 0 8 3 1 1 5
Estes Park 31 0 31 10 5 5 20
Ha reet Kan 8 0 8 3 1 1 5
Hazel Hei hts 22 0 22 7 3 4 14
Hezel View 20 0 20 8 3 3 13
Kendall Rid e 106 0 106 33 16 17 67
Kerse 3 Pro'ect 373 0 373 117 56 62 238
Lakeland: East Phase 1 130 0 130 41 20 21 82
Lakeland: Forest Glen At Lakeland 30 0 30 9 5 5 19
Lakeland: Park Rid e 256 0 256 80 40 42 182
Lawson Place 14 0 14 4 2 2 8
Me an's Meadows 9 0 9 3 1 t 6 ,
Montere Perli 174 0 174 54 27 29 710
Mountain View Estates 37 0 37 12 6 6 23
New Ho e Lutheren Plat 8 D 8 3 1 1 5
Rid e At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 33 16 17 86
S encer Place 13 0 13 4 2 2 8
Sd s Plat 29 0 28 9 4 5 18
�nte e Place 25 0 25 8 4 4 76
Wilbw Place _ 18'_ 0 _ 18 6 3 3 '11
Yates Plat 18: 0 16 5 2 3 10.
ToL71s 2143 2743 i670� _.` .. 331" 'i � '354. Y A355.
• Total from UndenConshudlon ' _,48. ' . 22 ` ` . 24. � _(90;
Grand�Totef3tudente Anticl ated 715 353 ' 377 1445
asno�i
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1N/05
Mdreh,2011
MULTI FAMILY
Development Name Units/ Cunent To Be Student Generauon Faaors
Parcels Occu anc Occu ied EIBm MitltllB HS Totel Elem Middle HS Total
Butte Estates 29 29 0 B 4 2 14 0.276 0.1379 0.069 0.483
CoxlWoodward TH 8 8 0 2 3 0 5 0.250 0.375 0 0.625
Lakeland: Ca ri 168 168 0 2 1 2 5 0.012 0.006 0.0119 0.030
Lakeland: Carrara 170 170 0 10 4 5 19 0.059 0.0235 0.0294 0.172
Lakeland: Madera 70 70 0 2 0 7 3 0.029 0 0.0143 0.043
Lakeland: Palermo A ts 362 362 0 30 8 14 52 0.083 0.0221 0.0387 0.144
Lakeland: Siena 101 701 0 2 2 3 7 0.020 0.0188 0.0297 0.069
Lakeland: Sorano 79 79 0 1 0 1 2 0.013 0 0.0127 0.025
Pacific Ave Du lexes 12 12 0 5 2 1 8 0.417 0.1667 0.0833 0.667
Pasa Finoll 19 19 0 1 1 2 4 0.053 0.0526 0.1053 0.211
Seasons at Lea Hill Villa e 332 332 0 104 51 39 194 0.313 0.1536 0.1175 0.584
7350 0 167 76 70 313 0.124 0.056 0.0519 0.232
2011 Under Conatuctlon
Development Name Units/ Current To Be StudeM Generetion Fedoro
Parcels Occu anc Occu led Elem Mlddle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total
Trail Run Townhomes 115 100 15 3 0 1 4 2 1 1 4
2011 and be ond
Unitsl Current To B8 StudentGeneralion Pactors
Development Name
Parcels Occu anc Occu led Elem Middle HS Total
Aubum Hills A tfTH 205 0 205 25 12 11 48
Crai Commercial 10 0 10 1 1 1 2
"D" Street Plat 32 0 32 4 2 2 7
Montere Park 85 0 65 8 4 3 15
Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 6 3 2 11
Totals 360 360 45 20 19 83
Com lexes Under Construction 2 1 1 4
Totai Antici ated Students 46 21 19 87
asrzoi�
Jl I�flllllll�n►�,''''i
Il��
D�e�°i�ge� S'chool Dist�ict
C'apatal Facilitzes Plan
2012-2017 .
Board Approved Jul� 25, ZOII
DIERINGER SCSOOL DISTRICT ND. 343 •
1320-178`�Avenue East
Sumner,Washmgton 98390
(253)862-2537
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
John McKenna
Jim BarFoot
Pete George
Corey Pawlak
James Premo
Dn Judy Neumeier-Martinson,Superintendent
. � ..
I�lerin.ger
Educating every child for
� Confidence today a�d
Contribution tornorrow
Dieringer School District No. 343 Dieringer School District
An Overview
Established in 1890,Dieringer School Distirict consolidated with Lake Tapps School
District in'1936.The DishicYs three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary Sctiool,Dieringe=
Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle 5chool,provide IC ttirough 8th
grdde eiincation,and serve as liubs for community aotivities as we11.Dieriage"r School
Distriet#343 is located ia tmincorporated Pierce County,bounded on the east by the
Wltite River,on the west by the Stiick River, on the north by the city,of Aubum,and on •
the south by the cities of Bonney Lake end Sumner.The Districtsurrounds the northem
two-tbirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately5.5 squaze miles.
The ciarent studeat enrollme�is appmximately 1,432 students in gades Idndergarten
througli eight. Students ia gcades first through third are housal"at Lake Tapps
Elemeatary,constructed in 2005 as a replacemeut project Dieringar Heights Elementary
opened in the fell of 2000 end is home to students in Idndergarten,fourth and fifth grade.
Originally constructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998 and 20D9,Nortli TappsMiddle
School houses students in grades sixth-eighth The district supports an,additiona1593
__
lugh school students who uiay select to attead any public Irigh"schooL The majority chose
to attead Aubtan Riverside, S�na and Bonaey L;ake High Schuols..
The district has a long standing lvstory of groviding high quality education for all our
students. Our goal is for oiu students to gain the sldlls that wiIl allow them to become
successful,confideat,conhibuting members of society. Diecinger"is composed 6f
students who comc to sc600l well prepazed and eager to learn.Parents are conaerned with
student success and provitle outstending support for:their children anil tlie Dieringer
School District The PTA and many volunteers conhibute countIess hours and resources
. _
to ois scliools end slude�s. The community supports the schools Uuough the passege of
fimding issues to support bus acquisition,student access to curte�technology and the
cons�uc�oa of school facilities
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
_ __.
Gapital Facilities.Plan Update, 2011
Ctiurent Facilities Inventory oBPublic SchooIs
NAME GAPACITY LOCATION
Lake Tapps Elemeatary 396 1320-178'"Ave E.,Lake Tapps .
Di�n�er Heights Elementary 547 21727—34�' St.E.,Lake Tapps "
North Tapps Middle School 567 20029-:12�'St;E.,Lake Tapps
High 5chool 0
TOTA.L � 1,510
_ , _ " " - _ _ ��'�' [:�� �,a . �I�I { t���G �{'.
'�ii�:��.�:
' �',M'�� '��� �, ,�. _
,= t� � � , �
� r.
r.. �
r'� ' �- -;*C.� i�� i
: '
�; ��`�"�. .. ,..
���: � r„ :
� ��,. �� ;
� - = .. I- r
- � 4 � .' � .1i � a •r �
I �
_ .
'I
�
. ���9 ' '� 'I
. _ . i .'I 1 L :
.V i � �� '`J I
•
-... l; . ._.
`' , ti.. l
' " �r ��rf. ': � t � -� \ `f
�'.. _ __ � ` 'r `' ` ` � '� V ".'!. �. ,
� ' : �
, �I I 1' ' �• IL /� .I ' . _
;
.� ` � t � �f• .
� ' ' • . / 1
i _ 1 - i� F I
'; �� -' ��. t i � ��': r C
' + L .
� ' � ' i i': �1 (��` ��-
`� , ' � tli- i � � �` �'k ��,r 7
' � i,� y ' f�L*! �.
.
' �� �a . ...� ;:� �; , �Fo��-�— ,
� � � \ , • '` � ' ,.�, �
`'' `i�,,,, �`� i `-� �:� V , ��. � i
:�
` S + fiL . i if �
€ 1 , � �
��� - . v �. \�f l . .a�'l � � :.� I �d � VQ'.
� - Y� � f 'I � i : 1 1 �� �
t� � ? ' ,
�'.�� 1 � il i�
ys �Qt : q� �� -. \F� .- r. � � � �`� -
- � 'i� y-' 'c�`y� 1 � ' � �'_� + � � � �'. ��Ji •,
''J'' , � �� i . i
� A
� � \ ,I!:,,. (
,1� � ' i � ' � r �� � t
`,� �r 1 � � � I v a � �� i '
D ��. I '�:. � ri ;'�i � i . i � r.p��„
,� �, u � t � :. 'i � ` :1 t �• �..
i
��$!�"° - _ + .� � , , �
< . . � . � � ' �
. . . � ���� - � ���� ,.
5 F �
� • � • � L.� �� � �' I ..:'1 � -]v
_ _ , � . �r..
,�� �I'" �.�..�`. i.� ._ .. .... . . .� �, '" ' �i ��`��S �j. .. ��
. ... . . ._. .. ,_: � . � . �r i
....� IP.' .i. /1 ti�. . � � , �. . �. .. 17.�� �'`����I
1
. _ � !i� �ri_�►i. � !.:::t;_::�4:�;�_���:. °. . �
- - - ;��: ;t;��>>�
Enrollmeut Projections �
The Dieringer School District:is located in an azea that continues to experieace growth
This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data,
proposed housing development, the assessed valuetion of the real property and the
mitigation impact fees received for:new construction
The Dis�ict contiaues to experience slow, steady growth m sdideat enrollment This has
miaored the Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational 3ervice District (PSESD)
enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed conshuctian within the
borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can be expected to
coatinue over the next four years and beyrond. This growtli trend will be slowed by
csurent economic canditions, liut will pick up in 2U11 and beyond. There are 373 single
family residems slated for constrvetion within the next five years. The multi-family
projects will contribute an additional 342 residential units during t�at time. These
PT�I� together with individual lots and general ia-mig�ation, are anticipated to
genecate an additiona1378 students m ldndergarten through eighth grade.
Information from Pierce county Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space
and zomng for approximately 1,200 additional housing lots in the westera portioa of the
district This cireates.apoteatial for 576 additional students, ldndergarten tkirough eighth
grade that are not iacIuded ia thc above numbers.
To partially address this growth; the Dis�ict passed a 2DD6 bond issue to conshvct an
additional five clessrooms at Dieringer Heigfits Eleme�ary. Those classrooms were
completed;and occupied in 2009. The bond issue also provided for the addition of an
• auxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science moms at North Tapps
11rTiddle 5chool. Those projects iivere completed in 2009 sud�e new instxvctionsl speces
are ia use: Future anticipated gmwth will create the,need to acquire aa additional school
site aad constivct:aa additional school to house the growing student enrollment.
Dieringer School District Proposed Housing.
Potential Enrollment Increase
July, 2011
Proposed Hoasiag Units for Approved Developments:
Single Family-373 x .48 generation factor= 179 students K-8 grade
Multi-family—342 x.1149 generation factor=39 students K-8 grade
(Calculated based on Auburn SD 2005 Cieneration Factor)
Proposed Honsiag Units from Individual Lots and In-migration:
160 students K-8 grade ,
Enrollment Impach
378 students K-8
Estimated 63 students a year over theperiod2011-2017
Potential five year enrollment increase=22.00%(based on 1,432 enrollment 5-11)
Increase per grade{eve1=42 students :
Appro�dmately 126,siudeats per schooI .
HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS
May 2011
#1 Fairweather Cove:Estates(22)Pierce Co
-Notice of applicatioa 1/24/O 1
-28 Single Family Lots
- 1600-2000 block of 16'�St.Q the 17500-178Q0 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy.
-61ots sold;3 hoases cbmpleted
#2 Rainier Plateap (10)Pierce Co
-Notice of application TO/13/OQ
- 10 Single Family Lots
-End of 34�`St.
-Site work completed; home coaslruction TBD
#3 Grandview Ridge II und III(9)Pierce Co
-Off Sumaer-Tapps Hwy.acrbss from Driftwood end Dcer Island Dr.
-C�randdview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13/99
-49 Single Family Lots; completed
-III(91ots)no date(no cliange)
#4 Northlalce('7�Anbnrn
north of Lake TappsElementary
. -Preliminary Plat 7/23/02 .
-197 Single Family Lots
-120 homes completed/nnder rnnstrucrioa; three developera;new starts will
rnntinue
#S The Estatea(30}Pierce Co
-Notix of application 8/27/04
-234 single family Lots '
-South of mad iem�inus from Lakeland Hills Hwy.
-204 homes completed
#6 Tapps Meadow(Van Der$oek)(11)Pierce Co
-Notice of application 9/13/U4
-11 large lots
-across finm Snag Island
-site work complete(no chauge)
#7 Conntry Creek Es�tes(9)Pierce Co
- -10 Single Family Lots-off 15'�aeaz Edwards Road
-one(1)hoase completed
#8 Forest Canyon Estates (1Z1)Pierce Co
-121 Single Family Lots-0 _ffForest Canyon Rd.
-eagineering plan not submitted to Pierce County
#9 Forest Canyon,Heights(4)Pierce Co
-21 Single Family Lot�—off Forest Canyon Rd.
-16 homes completed; 1 ander constrnction;
#10 Terrace View Town homes(18)Auburn
-59 imits; i,2&3 bedroom units;East Valley and Lake Tapps Pkwy.
-AuBurn City Limits.
-41 units completed and occapied;
#11 Carter Es�tes(1�Anbnra
-16 5mgte Family Lots—L.ake Tapps Pazkway and 179�'
-16 homes(no cons{rqction schednled)
#12 Sia Kilns(324)Smm�er
-324 Multi-family units;north of Sumner Meadows
-Sumner City limits
-324 nnits; site work
#13 PortoSno(Lakeland 8) (64)Anbnrn
-68 Single FamiIy lots-north of Lake Tapps Pazkway
fi8 homes;
-4 under consiraction by Investco
373 Single FamlyUnits to be bnilt- $1,120,565
F7eree Connty-216 gencrate 5649,080 at$3005 per unit
Anbnrn-157 generate S471,785 at$3005 per nnit
342 MulHple Family IInits to be bailt
5/11
Standard of Service
The Dieringer School District hvuses children in elememary schools serving students
laudergarten through fifth grede�d a middle school that hnuses grades six through
eighth. High school stnde�s,gisdes nine through twelve,attend adjacent lugh schools,
piimarily in the Aubum and Sumner School Districts.
Dibringer School District follows a tr�aditional school cal�dar beginning in early
_. . _
September and completing in mid Jiine. Tl�e daily scliool schedutes begia between 7:49
and 8:45 am.and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m.
TheDieringer School District_standard of service is based oa class size and pragram
decisions adopted by the Dieringer School ITistrict Board of Directors. Based on the
district ghilosophy regarding class si�,.tfie targeted nnmber of students per class�oom
ldndergarten through third grade is 23,fourtfi through fi$h grade 26 and sixth thmugh
eighth grade 29. These class sizes have aa�mpacton fecilities and the permanent
capacity of each scfiool reflects these class sizes.
In the District,rooms designated and assigned for special vse are not coanted as capacity
classrooms. At the elementary leveI students are provicled musia instriiction,physical
edueatioa and ert instractioa in sepacate,non-r�apaciry clessi�ooms. Computer labs aze
provided at each school as non-capacity speces. Special education aad remedial
progtams are provided es pullout piogtams and do not provide capacity. At the middle
school level;mstruction is organized araund a six period day;classrooms are calculated
as pi�oviding 5/6 capacity w aocommodate teacher plenniug time in the inshuctional
space;
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Capital Facilities Pian Update, 2011
Dieringer School District Service Standards .
Publie Scliool Facilities
(Sauare,Feet Per Studentl
Elementary School 120
Middle School 189
� Junior Fi'igh �- NA
H'igh School NA •
Dierineer School District Individnal Canacitv Proiects f2011-201'7)
Elementary School No. 3 400
H'igh School NA '
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Capital Facilities Plan Update,July 2011
CFP Projeots and Financing Plan
Sources and Uses of Funds
(x$1,000)
Sources of Funds
Existing Revenue: �
Reserve $1,400
New Revenue:
Bonds;:Levies, Fees, State Matching
Funds,Dedications, Mitigation Payments 20 750
TOTAL SOURCES 22 150
Uses of Funds
Elementary School No. 3 ($20,750)
Non-Capacity Projects:
School Site & Technology Upgrades 1 400
TOTAL USES 22 150
BALANCE 0
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
FINANCE'PLAN
July, 2011
Permanent Capacity Projects Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source offunds
Estimated Esdmated Estimated Bond & State Impact
Cost Bond Amt. State Match IMerest Match Fees
Elementary School No. 3 20,750,000 20,750,OD0 0
Total Capacity Projects 20,750,000 20,7bD,000 0 0 0 0
Non-Capacity Projects
School Site Elem: No. 3 500,000 500,OU0
Technology Improvemenfs 900;000 0 0 0 900,000
Total Non-Capacity Projects 1,400,000 0 0 0 0 1,400,000
TOTAL PROJECTS � 22,�150;000 20,750'000 0 0 0 1,400,000
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS
AAASTER SCHEDULE
July, 2Q11
Name Current 6-Year Total
Ca a ' Ca aci Ca a ' 2011 2012 20 3 2� 2015 2016
Lake Tapps Elementary 396 396
(LTES Replacement)
Dieringer Heights Elem. 547 547
Etementary $choof No. 3 400 400 x
North Tapps MS Incl 567 567
NTMS Additions 2D09
TOTALS 1510 400 1910
DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343
Gapital Facilities Plan Update,2011
Capital Fac�ties Reguirements to 2017
Time Pariod Studant Stude� Net Resarva Totel Cost
Population Capacity Or(Deficiency) (CosNStudem
X
Nat Daficieocy)
2011 Actual 1432 1510 78
2011-2017 Growth 378 400 22
Dferinger School DistriM Cost Per Student
(2QI1 Dollers)
Elgmenmry Middle Junior Hi� High
Schools Schools Schools Scfidals
$29,520 $41,458 NA AIA
School Im ct Fee Calculation 7H 1 DISTRIC7 D.fertnger School,Dkhicf :.;
School Site ulaitlon CosC
AcresxCost ar Acre/FaciC Ca ac' xSiudent Generafion Factor
Student Student
Facifi Cosf/ Facili Foetor Facfor Cost/ CosF1
Acreage Acre Capacify SFR MFR SFR MFR
Eteme t200: $50p,� `40D 0322 -':: 0.069. .824 1,031
Middle 0.158 A.046
.:...-�:.�� . . .._..:�:. , _.:-.....� . _ r.;::...._.........::..� .
TOTAL $4.824 $1.031
School coneWcdon Coet
Facili CosT/Fac�i Ca c xSTudent Generafion Faetor x ermanent/Total 5 R
Student Student
Facllftyr • Faclllty Factor Factor Cost! Cost/
Cost Ca aci SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementa No.3 $20,750,000 400 0.32Z 0.069 16,704 $3,579
_. , .
_ _
0.158 0.046
TOTAL $16,704 3,579
Tem ora FacUi Cost
Fac CosF/FacDi Ca a ' x5tudent Generation Factor x e ora /fotd 5 uare Feet
Student Student Cost/ Cost/
'RTemp/ FaciU Facili Factor Factor SFR MFR
Total Sq. Cost She SFR MfR
Hementa ;$0 `c ,0' 0.322 0.069
Mlddle ;$0 ' 0 0.158 0.046
. ...._ ._._;:5r....... ......._:.r,�. -
TOTAL $0 0
Sta6a AAatehin Crad[C
Boeckh Index X SPI uare Foota e X�isfiict Match%X Student Factor
Student Studeni
Boeckh SPI D'ahict Factor Facfor Cosf/ Cost1
Index Footage Match 4b SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementa
Middle --•--
Torai. $o g0
TaxPa mentCredit SFR MFR
Aveta e Assessed Value est. ?Al l :$386,675 . $Z74,b00
Ca Ital Bond InteresT Rate 7/i l 4.31% 431$
Net Present Vatue of Avera e Dwellin $3 088,435 I $2,193 274
10 `10
Property Tax Levy Rate 2011 $3:2914 33.2914
Present Value of Revenue Siream $10,165 $7,219
Fee Sume : Sin le MuIN le
I
Site Ac uistion Costs 4,824.�0 1,031.00
Permanent Pacifi Cost 16,703.75 3,579.38
Tem or FaG Cosf .00 0.00
State Match Credrt .OD 0.00
Tmc Pa ent Credrt 10,165.28 $7.218.94
fEE $T1,362 ($2,609)
Fff WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% 55.681
FffWITHDISCOUNTOF�� � ($1,304)
FEDERAL WAY�PUBLIC SCHOOLS
2012
CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Tony Moore
Amye Bronson-Doherty
Ed Barney
Angela Griffin
Suzanne Smith .
SUPERINTENDENT
Rob Neu �
Prepazed by: Sally D..McLean
Tanya Nascimento
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1
' INTRODUCTION 2-3
SECTION 1 Tf�CAPITAL FACILI7`IES PLAN
Introduction 4
Inventory of Educational Facilities 5
Inventory ofNon-Instructional Facilities 6
Needs Forecast-Existing Facilities 7
Need4 Forecast-New Facilities 8
' Six Year Finance Plan 9
SECT[ON 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Introduction 1 T
Map-Elementary Boundaries 12
Map- Middle School Boundaries 13
Map-High School Boundaries 14
SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Introduction 15
Building Capacities 16-17
I Portable Locazions 18-19
Smdent Forecast 20-22
Capacity Summaries 23-27
King Counry Impact Fee Calculations 28-30
SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2011 31-33
PLAN
1
FEDERAL WAYPUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILTTIES PLAN
INTRODUCTION
In response to the re_quirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act
(SHB)2929(1990)and ESHB ]025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee
' Ordinancesof King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249
effedtive:December 21, 1995 as amended, Ciry of Kent Ordinance No3260 effective
Maich 1996, and the City ofAuburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way
Public Schools has updated its 2012 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2011.
This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King Counry, the City of Kent, City of Federal
Way and the Ciry of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each
jurisdiction by reference. 'This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the
Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the Ciry of Des Moines has not
adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact
fees as part ofthe SEPA process.
The Growth Management Act requires the Counry to designate Urban Growth areas
within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning
Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Crrowth Area
Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within ihe
Federal Way planning area; which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries.
King Counry will encourage.and actively support the development of Urban Centers to
meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture,.and recreation. This Plan's
estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption.
This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction,which
requires its use to meet the needs o£the Growth Management Act. Thisplan is not
intended to be the sole planning 4001 for all of the District needs. The District may
prepaze interim plans consistent with Boazd policies or management need.
CurrenUy,the District plans to replace Federal Way High Sohool and to increase capacity
by approximately 200 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. It has been
added onto at least I O times and currently has an almost maze-like layout. Based on a
2006 bond estimated construction cost,the estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High
School is$81 million. Final construction costs are under consideration by the Boazd for
the February 2012 bond election.. Plans to replace Decatur High School and to increase
capacity by approximately 200 students are platmed in a Iater phase. None of the cost to
replace Decatur High School is included in the Impact Fee calculation in this Plan.
The non-instructional projects inbluded in the plan will consolidate support services
operations at a single location. The current Transportation and Maintenance faciliry
cannot continue to ineet the Disdtict needs in the futnre. 1Vutrition services and other
administrative functions will also relocate to this centralized location.
The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and
capaciry at ow schools. Onesuch factor is SHB 2776,which will phase in full-day
kindergarten for all studenu and degrease K-3 class size&om 20 to 17. This is proposed
to be fully funded by 2017-18. Using cunent enrollment,the decrease in class size would
create the need for an additional 69 classes for K-3 students. This num6er would
2
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
significacrtly increase by 2017-18. The District will follow this bill as it progresses and
assass the faciliry impact thisbiU will create. Another factor would be the inclusion of a
Program of Early Leaming for at risk children within the overall Program of Basic
Education. The District will also continue to follow tlie changes in legislation�
surrounding the Running Start program. Changes in availatiility and'cost to pazents of
this program could resnit in t}ie return of high school students to ow soHools.
We will also continue to study school bodndaries as new housing and fluctuating
populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be reguired in the
coining years. We currently have three azeas under review for boundary changes. The
maps included in this Plan reflect our current 6oundaries.
3
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC.SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 1 -T'HE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
.
T'he State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of inforination be
gathered to determine the faciliries availa6le and needed to ineet the needs of a growing
community.
This section provides information about current facilities,existing facility needs,and
expected future faciliry requirements for Federal Way Public Schools.AFinancial Plan
that shows expected funding:for any new construction, portables and modernization listed
follows this.
4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILTI'IES
ELEMENTARYSCHOOLS
Adelaide 1635 SW 304`" St Federal Way 98023
Btigadoon 3601 SW 336`"St Federal Way 98023
Camelot 4041 S 298`"St Auburn 98001
Enterprise 35101 5'"Ave SW Fedenl Way 98023
Green Gables 32607 47'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308'"St Auburn 98001
Lake Grove 303 SW 308'"St Federal Way 98023
Lakeland 35827 32od Ave S Auburn 98001
MarkTwain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003
Meredith Hilt 5830 S 300�'St Aubum 98001
Mirror Lake 625 S 314�'St Federal Way 98003 .
Nautilus(K-8} 1000 S 289'"St Federal Way 98003
Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023
Panther Lake 34424 1°'Ave S Federal Way 98003
Rainier View 3015 S 368'�St Federal Way 98003
Sherwood Forest 34600 12'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Silver Lake 1310 SW 325'�Pl Federal Way 98023
Star Lake 4014 S 270t6 St Kent 98032
Sunnycrest 24629 42°"Ave S Kent 98032
Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320'" St Federal Way 98023
Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Aubum 98001
Wildwood 2405 S 300'"St Federal Way 98003
Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16`"Ave S Des Moines 98198
1VIIDDLE SGHOOLS
Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003
Illahee 36001 1"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 �
Lakota 1415 SW 314�' St Federal Way 98023
Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003
Sagtialie 33914 19`"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
Sequoyah 3450 S 360'"ST Aubtun 98001
Totem 26630 40'"Ave S Kent 98032
TAF.Academy(6-12) 26630 40'"Ave S Kent 98032
HIGH SCHOOLS
Decatur 2800 SW 320�' St Federal Way 98023 '
Federal Way 30611 16�'Ave S Federal Way 98003
Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288�'St Auburn 98001
Todd Beamei 35999 16`"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Career Academy at Truman 31455 28�'Ave S Federal Way 98003
ALTERNATIVE SCHOOLS
Merit School 36001 151 Ave S Federal Way 98003
Internet Academy 31455 28`"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Employment Transition Program 33250 21"Ave SW Federal Way 98023
5
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CURRENT INVEIVTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES
Develooed Prouertv
A�inistrative Building 31405 18`"Ave S Federal Way 98003
IvIOT Site 1066 S 320`h St Federal Way 98003
Central Kitchen 1344 S 308'"St Federal Way 98003
Federal WayMemorial Field 1300 S 308`h St Federal Way 98003
Nortliwest Center 33330 8`"Ave S Federal Way 98003
Leased Soace
Community Resource Center 1813 S Commons Federal Way 98003
- Student Support Annex 32020 1�'Ave S Federal Way 98003
Notes:
In November 2011,the Administrative Building,Community Resource Center,and
Student Support Annex will be relocated to the Northwest Corporate Center. The leases
for the Community Resource Center and the Student Support Mnexwill end in
November 201 l. In 2010, construction began on Site 81. The MOT Site&Central
Kitchen will be relocated to this:site in late 2011. The Administration Building and MOT
Site have been surplussed and wil4 be marketed for sale.
Undevelooed Proaerlv
Site L,ocation
#
75 S W 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW-9.2 Acres
65 S 351 st SVeet& 52nd Avenue S-8.8 Acres
60 E of IOth Avenue SW -SW 334th& SW 335`�Streets - 10.04 Acres
73 N of S W 320`�and east of 45`�PL S W-23.45 Acres
71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S- 17.47 Acres
82 1" Way S and S 342'� St-Minimal acreage
96 S 308�' St and 14�'Ave S-:36 Acres
8 t S 332'� St and 9�'Ave S-20 Acres
Notes:
Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction
requirements. Propertiesmay be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed
to house students in the District.
6
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES.PLAN
NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FAGILITIES
EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF
_ _ -- . .
FUNDS
Purc6ase and Relocate Interim Capaciry Anticipated source of funds is
Portables Im act Fees.
Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Future bond:authorization
Increase Ca aci
Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Future$ond authorization.
Increase C aci
The District isalso replacing some non-instructional facilities. The District has
purchased 20 acres(Site#8I)for construction of consolidated facilities for support
services functions. Transportation,Nutrition Ser4ices, Maintenanbe and other non-
instructional fiinctions will be housed at this centralized location.
As part of the multi-phase plan,the District intends to increase capacity for high school
students with expansion at the Federal Way High School site. Increased capacity at
Federal Way High and Decatur High in later phases supplant the need for construction of
a fifth comprehensive high school.
7
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIG SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
NEEDS:FORECAST-ADDITIONALFACILITIES
NEW FACILITY LOCATION� ANTICIPATEDSOURCE �
OF FUNDS
No current plans for additional facilities.
8
FEDERAL WAY PUBL[C SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Sia Year Finance Elan
Secured Funding Sources.
6n MFees 1 5357360
Lend Sale Fwds 2 "f6 8 427
Bo�dF�mds(3) �ES),685,554
State Mekh(4) E5,622,215�
TOiAL �553 S 702
Projected Revenue Sources
� S�aOe MaOCh 5 S7A 00000
Doid or Le F�mds 5103 000
�Lend Fund Sales - $10 000 00
� Im c[Fees 8 5800
� � � TOTAL - - 5133,800,000
Actual and Planned Expenditures otd SecorM Fundiug aod Pmjected Reveove $186,883,703'
-NEW SCHOOL3 Canmtaod Budget 2012 21113 2014 2015 2016 2017 Tatal TotelCost
PriorYearo 301�-ti 30�2-13 1013-14 201415 20I5-16 701617 ]017-18 2011-20i7
MOOFRNI7ATION AND EXPANSION _
ederal Wa Hi ��School 9 526625000 w,25o,aoo - �&i25000 E81 00000 581 0 0
SITE ACQUISRION
ormenCemer 519 OOD EI95000 200000 200000 205000 5215000 � - 22 000 ?25000 SI46000 � SI S
(Employmrnt Trartstian Pmgrem)(10) �
TEMPORARY FAC7LRIE3
atables II E200,OD0 $200,000 5200000 5200000 5800 S8 0
OTAL SI90,000 5395,000 527AZ5,000 536,650A00 SI8S30,000 5215,000 1220,000 SZESA00 583,I60,00 583,450,0
NOTES:
I. These fees me t��rtemly bemg Aeld in a King Counry,City ofFedcal Wry mid Ciry ot Kmt impaa ke acwmt,md will be
avmlabkforusebytheDi9rictfmsyskmimprovemrnb. Thisisyearrndbalanceonl2/31/10.
2.Thae Ponds are expttted to cane from the�le oftM1e cwrrnt ESC and MOT sdes.This is ypr rnd bal�ce on 12li1/10.
3. This is the 12/31/10 W lence of bond fundz ThB figure includa mlant emninge.
4. ThisreprtsrntsthebalanaofSmhMatchFunMforVdhalla,PanifiaLakqLakel�d,m�dSunnyaatElemmlarioa�dlakdeMiddleSchool,xotkon�ecificbuildingup�adesisoavrtiog.
This¢�he balance on 12lJ I/10. -
S.ThisismnicipatedSpteM�chforprojeasattachedlaartrentbond'umu. ThuisbaadooDecembv2010�PI�povedawada. SlaleMatchfundsarebringusedPorhighprioriryrepairs,upAades�
andrystemimprovemrntstoexi9ingbuiidings. ThescimprovrnenbincludeHVAC,m�dotM1asWCNralimprovene�ts�enotrdeledmc�aziryinaeam.
b.7fint include E22m of vota approved,but not isued m�d S81 m xheduled frn vote spproval in Fcbfuary 2012.
7.Projeqed sde of wry�us pwpe�ties These fimds w0I be used to M've debt inwrrtd fm the ecquistion of a rtplacwncm Gdvwlionai Suppwl Cenhr.
8.7La<me pmjecred 6eas based W on Imuwn roidrnUal developmrnis in Ihe Distria ova Brc nat sx yems.This figure uswna 525,000 pa monih for t6e nat ax�ems.
This figure Aas ban adjusted ro rc9at Ihe amrait aonomy.
9.Pmding Board�����d arota auU�ari�lion in Febuary 2017
10.Nwman Crntet was purchared'm 2010 10 houae�he Employment Tromiuon Plogan. The 52.Im purchas 6az 6een finm�ced�hmugh a 9ate approvcd loal pro�am tivoug6 2020.
II.Thesefea«pramti6eco9of�pm�asngm�d'msMlmg�rcwpo�bkv. Theporftbleeiepmdinrtein(utureY�smay�lamexisdngpmtabla�hs�menotfimcfional. .
Thae mey not incaase c�aciry�d ffie na included'm�he capacity mmmary.
9
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 2 -MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES
Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two
schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four
high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public
Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves studenu in grades 6-
12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area. The Career Academy at Truman
High School serves students in grades 9-12. The Intemet Academy serves grades K-12.
The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. _
(Cazeer Academy at Tnunan High School, Merit School, Internet Academy and Federal
Way Public Academy serve students from t}uoughout the District). The identifed
boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of
programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas.
The Growth Management Act requires thata jurisdiction evaluate if the public faciliry
infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developmenu. ln the case of mosipublic
facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to
that development. School Districts aze different. If the District does not haye permanent
facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can bebuilt or
until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding
faciliries.
Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken
lightly. It is recognized that the�e is a potential impact on students who are required to
change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school.
We currently have 3 areas under consideration for boundary changes.
[t is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the
construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth
throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the
district,not just azound a single development.
11
. • • � i
� • o e � �
ii iRiiii�L�^iiii�� �l���� ���I
_ � �� e.����;��:::::�;.,.i � , . ,
.. ��i{���`�:� m r C
mm r
5�m i.� / ■
� ;°u'�ri1�J' Iq��l ��r� ��
� ��:�.�..r.���!�� ! ��
p . '1�;'���I���VIl�� � � �
� : l:a,��'��� �� ���
� '�. ��•s!.�'', 7
� : �.� r1
� •
�� ' i��� � �����,�
�, +rmnp�;;�;um @
�iu�ui��, rn i ��" ��I�
�Pi�p� nnr ; l 4 �� -��'I�..
':��rr'.`� '}7J ' �� ��i.�
.a .�t�
��m1e , If�
��II ��Ir�1�� �
��1�� ��r�� �
` ,�
�� fi - -�^�J�-•
�: ,f�'�,������� , al
- �;�V.- ��
�� .,w
� . �_ � , s o�a � , i r�
� < �'; � ���n` i�a� ��;I i
�! �I,��u��'r,���liU��[�,"��u����
� _.e ��� f'r�!I A l� �It�i�1�i�1
� � �� ur@ �I�ui �:'� �I"`%"+��� ,
� �fi���,� �. f a■n�,.,_�ns��� .: �r; 9
t e�' ,� � �. r c�i:dl�1+_''�b-'
1 �� `��14i:�E��k�f��.r.'�E��..ec:`,�i� �
���, {!' �L�T1iliy�!Ilu �- '
r•"�l' °�. rA a�i��rs:���saa� 0� :���tt 1
�� �1�` � h
��i���u,',. i�o� v"� �,�Tq�r�`,_,,�G�1m,;"i' �I:�,,I,�J n �� �
�f�Lri►,� I�1d� �tk.Ti.r.7Y1:7Y�i'�� ,��1
� ifi�1:� �,LbZi���+�j�i tie���fi ����7' ■ �`,��:1�
����.�„�� "-�',S a ° ���=� �� 1.:1
�iyn,l,tl� ,��ull�J � oi' +r.
I� �f' t I . 3+ a rl��f �:.. �
��'��� � s $ ,�'��
ti���„!��_ _ ..,;�: r"J'
i������`� /ili , �� �� Ir ..�
y s�E--�`. Y'�El ��' a���ca
1_l�= m�i �� mu If •�
�S��;r� � � :- �� �R��1�14��:
,! ri�3iv�1�. � � u.... ' � 11111�
� `�.�1ff!� �� u'''1'�"� �rONI� ��
�E9I I ���1111111' I��.
`���III��F `► I �►1 �::1,1�/�! (:_
�� ,� muuu
e�Ul�li•!� .i\
v' a�' nM if�ll.�f
'� � �� �y�� \ nn.�nmw �
\��w `91?� n nurnu` ���
.,,.... + � naunmi. .�
..... L �!41 � ��xnunmv �r �
�i�1 �F �•�`••i�I�INNIRII �j�
�F"-. . " .tl ��INIS11' Itl lL-' +
-y,� � rr . �r n1�11:1 F�R�v-�1
�JRI w�\� '�rll lllliuq � a�
l 1NI111111171 ���
��fil ��xtu� ,.,,;I■�.
. • • �
� r • • : • r � .
II � nnni6if�l��llr_ j
� I'T.�I� �a � ���
►}►n�+,�:,,n ,��W� ir
... `:;;I: �� n_ * ��
nmi `
�� •'�i���i:�r ��r'�� `�
� . Yum�� n �'��
_� ,::;���tl� ~�. � •■�
1TF r��, ���
ri < �� 1��1 .�� r
� , '��.m'UI ,°��� o:'�F. lu
..
w' Ifil 111a���n.ui , }I "" ;-:�
` 1�1
� �'����CC 11111 ! � -q � —��
'� '���'��"' >>�=: �;� �
.A ',��, �,1��1 ,�
� ,�`��II �In,I�� °A I
� ` '1��'vJ^ i
��'��- i ��, �
, ���� �����;�„ ��
� r� ,;
;:
. �: , , y ��
� ' ���
g � 7
. �u� ��r �r+, '��1��f!liJ1'�
/ ��.• �g�" ��`'�r ��ji�����t� 1
11 �� ul��li����y'/S� i:i�;.��n��� '� ���G�� I
�� j�,'' •� �t-����5'E1F.�`~��`•��
�-'L�i��17liF 11�'u �;L�;i '� �. �
� � _ �'..����ri�+���■II:.� : ��1�!i�� � —
��� � :����+G�j;�������' l�L 1 ,
�.��, c �i ,�. •, - , . 3'► n r
� - .� . et:L�rlrlr.� r ��
�"1'��i�r` ��ir reylf m� � II� a � ��■�
'I � rw � `
1'��'�—�!`" �I��L�` �I ° x �~Q �����11,
� wr �� wJ. �!
,.-C��� �na,., a - �a
�`��il� �l`��� 4' ���yy� �:�. =�r;vl�. _
:�`f ��
„J � r r
��� �C��,.�. ' � � ✓. -�7�',af1� t. ,..__
i �, ���� � �ra� ���
ti 1d1�` tia " � � " -renn ••
'��� ��� � :'. n.. �ru���(�'�p�
1 �x... 11111 �j.�a�i
.....,.. �I�r�r�� �.
E � � ���rnaru �.G
,��N�'�` �a�an�u �G`�
+��� l�1 ��ainmro +
� �enmr � 1:� p
`Y. �ti R" a�{� unnnru�� [[[
��; IIN�Illilfl� � q _
��w � � ICfi1111111 �I`.��
1 t !7 rsrn�mnn�� �� �
�iliiil ` �;\ (11111111N11r �r
yry� l�\��n11111lN��IlI �
v � �� - �IiB71P m ��w��
p ' -�.`'' �rJ u��
��'-- - � ,R�n uu iii �i'Y��
�r,T ,��q � 1 «f��r�r�wa�r e�— �
rlll� mnnr�
�umn �����
� : • • 1
• s : • � . .
,.ya:irn�•�...���.�.
�.,,ili�Wli �,
�irnni'.� �.� ,� ;
., :�„1� � �� iii���ll `��
n.u� ■�
- �. �'��.•..�r...�l.���!��'� �i
.. . ^:��..,...�.._��� � �
_ l:���t��j�� �''1�
.,
_ rti� �,,
� . �� � w ��,`�r! � �'"��Sr
eNi�ra� � ;° I
.f�,•'�:��:'d9,� II°' ��!'
� }'N�u�� �"�' l ,,_ ' '�`
�.,t M, �.�
� -
. . . J`` 11���� <.I*,�(�•
.ce�aeC... �
��t�� �� � ��I � Y �
ti'������...*J�
.
n�nu� �
,,,,,����,��';I'r'9��.en�1�i. �
@ ��`�-� , � ,
3.�n
� , ��,
� � , t
�A �:�:l��r ,i�f'i '���u�
-�^ tFi ��[��� A r+��fl�fl� ���7 I
'r' !i 61� ���7.�,�,.1 �
0 �r���� ,�R,� �;.�� ��� � � �9� i �i3�!�tl
+I4 � C�yL� YI!/ Y SL� I`y�
�= �l��1l���'-�'�1��i`n����ffi1���1�`��T'7'�Et . I
��` ��+ ��l)1!l3111.��i��3,1 � ���
� =� ��a�i������ia� = ��n��6 �
�� ,���. �r�4r,� �f'i5�� �'��m ��� iR7i�i
"' � � 'St1�f�!1 .e,�1�
��w ���� 'fJ� Ih�+�k �-e11'� � �;���0�
�'�7 i� �f il rs r� • T.+{i . ��� i L ��
� �r �i+y!!i'�l, #� �_ �ir31'
■
d�� 7��� � ,��e� ���+ �, '�_y ' � rY�,i _iTd �
�^N! Zt"�'�� 11r�eac•, �..''!�
a. o.,r�. �i . �! ��.
a�•�n �
,'������ , � i 7��iii ri��
q�l�� .Pa ��� �i' � � s�i��!��
�_
^3�r �a��� � � s �..,i . siilll ��'C�:++
���7�� `�� ii �1 �I�NIII� I�iir
AE � ...n.wn �;�
� d � ���a�ianu
���' i���irt� F J�� ...,,,,��,��
-: °�� , .e � � � �txr�rr r �G\N
�','�� a • �� nui��nu�i�;GC�/:
e�cmr�m . /�
,,� 111' � '� { 11:�11111111`� r�!�•..�
V��� 1%��HIO�IN d � ►��
`q�p V Y�� I Illqtlfllll/
Vi:; � ��41111�111�1�1�1
w ��� E.`���o�u �r� 1 ���
r1,:_.. �1 �n�Nil ��Gl
..���� �. .�w ��►� inuieiiir°i ��9
k�ll� rmnur � M
�qe�l � uiui 4
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 3- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
Building Capacities-The Education Program
Portable Locazions
Stndent Forecast—2012 through 20]8
Capacity Summaries
King County Impact Fees- Single and Multi-Family Uniu
15
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Buildin¢Caoacities
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's"standard of service" in order to
ascertain the DisKricYs current and future capacity. 7'he Superintendent of Public
Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not
take into consideration the education program needs.
In general, the DistricYs current target class size provides that the average class size for a ...
standazd classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. In grades 3-5 the target
is 25 students: For grades-6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for
students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated
at 12 seats perclassroom.
Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base liae,the Distriot hascalculated a
program capaciry for all schools. A r8cent Study& Survey was.the basis for changes to
the OSPI building report. T'he following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI
calculation.
Music Roams:
Each elementary school requires a standazd classroom for music instruction.
All Day Kindergarten:
Every elementary school operates a4least one al(day Kindergarten program. These all
day Kindergarten programS require additional capacity because the standard classroom is
available for one all day session rather than two half day sessions. The District will
operate.52 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2011-12.
Special Edacation Resource Rooms:
Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s)for
special education studenu requiring instruction to address specific disabilities.
English as a Second Language Programs:
Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom
for students leaming English as a second language.
Middle School Computer Labs:
Each middle school has computer labs,except Totem Middle School. Wireless access
has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed,these
computer labs may be converted to mobile carts.
High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource)Room:
Each high school provides sgecial education resource room and cazeer development
classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities.
PreschooVECEAP/Headstart:
Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs 8c typically
developing students at 8 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart
program at 6 schools(3 elementary&3 high schools). T'hese programs decrease capacity
at those sites.
16
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS'2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITffS
FId�11IDVTARI'BUQDPIG 11�DLESCNOOL BWDING
PRO(22AMCAPACRY PRO(atAMCAPACfII' � . .
SclioolNaine Fleadcotin SchoolName Fleadaount FI'E
AdeFSide 372 ', Illahee 855 864
oon 319 Klo 829 837
Camelot. � 269 �. lakota . 707 _714. � .
Fnte rise_ - � 458 � Saca' uea � �.. 655 ' 662
(}bbn Cabk"s 437 Sa hzlie 804 812
Is1t Ilolloff 433 Se uo ah 569 575
Iake Caovr 323 Totem 739 746 .
lakeland 406 Federal VJa PubGc Acad 2U9 211
MarkTwain 287 Technolo Access Foundation Acede "• '
Mered'¢h FWl 453 20117Y17'AL 5 67 5,421
Mirtor Wre 325 �
Nautilus(K•8) 367
Olymp¢Viea 348 •hSdlleSchaolA�sr e 737 744
Pentherlake 434
RamierVxw 432 FD(�ISCHOOGBUQ,DING
ShmwodForcst 423 ' � PROCAtAMCAPACIR'
S�verlak 410
Starlak 361 SchoolName Headcount FfE
Sunn crost 382 Decatur I249 1 36
, 7tvmlakes 297 FadomlVJa I538 1 45
Valhalla 442 Ttio�reslefferson 13�9 1,443
WOdtwad 297 Tadd&amer 1123 1 01
Woodmont -8 346 CamerAcad azTmman 163 174
201I TOTAI.. 8 21 Fedeial Way PubGc Academy 109 117
lo� nt TraniRion Pro rem 48 51 .
. Technolog��Access Foundafion Academy"
�e A�er e 375 2011 TOTaL 5,579 5,961
� `Ffi h Schaol A�er e f IS 1 06 ��
Notes: ,
•Fedeml Wag PublicAcademy,CarcerAcademy at Truman High School,and Fmployment T�ansition Program �
arc non-boundary schools. These schools arc not usad'm tha calculated avereges. � �
•�Technology Access�Foundffiion Academy is housed entoel}�m porta6les '
on the To[emMiddle School sile. �
17
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Portable Locations
T'he Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic '
education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity
� for 500 students due.to.lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates
throughout the ybar and&om year to year.
Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house studenu when .
increasing population impacts a.school attendanpe area, Por[ables may also be required �
to house students when new or changing programs require additional capaciry. They also
provide temporary housing for students un61 pertnanem facilities can be financed and
constructed. When permanent facitities become available, the portable(s) is either used
for otherpurposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for
an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due.to age or pfiysical
condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy.naw.portables and surpins tHese
unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that �
portables aze not acceptableas permanent facilities.
The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for
temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools.
1s
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PORTABLE LOCATIONS
PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED � . .
AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT�HIGH SCHOOIS ' �
. �a„ - � -� — --- pr -- - .
asmurnariu. nrnwma.u. ve•wicrnxn�. crsmucrtux,u.
Adelaide - � I 2. � Decatar 9 � � ��-
Br'�adoon � - 1. Federal Wa . 2 1 �
Ca`melof � 1 Thomas lefferson 10
Entc rise 2 1 Todd Beamer 9
Grern Gables t TAF Academ 8 1
Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 38 �2
LakeGrove � - 1 ' 1 -- -- -- -- � - � --
Lakeland " � ' � �
Mark Twain � 2 1 �
Meredith Hill. 1 2- - �
Miaor Lake 4 PORTABLES LOCATED
Nautilus � 1 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES
mp�c. rcw 1 1
PaMher Lake MOT 1
Rainier View 1 2 TDC 5
Shenvood Forest 3 1 TOTAL 6
SilverLake 1 3
Star Lake�. 4
Sumrycrest HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES
� Twin Lakes� - � 3 -
Va�alla Sherwood Forest 1
W ildwood 4
� o mont 3 To� 1
TOTAL 31 20
PORTABLES LOCATED
AT MmDLE SCHOOIS
�
wsiavrnoxu. nsmurna+u.
Illahee 3
Kilo 7
lakota
Saca'awea 7 '
Saghalie 2 2
Se uoyah I 1
Totem
Merii 3
TAF Academ 8 1
28 7
19
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Student Forecast
Student enrollment projections are.a basic component of budget development.
Enrollment projections influence many ofthe financial estimates that go into budget
preparation. The majoriry of staffing requirements are derived directly from the
forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are
also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue
projections aze directly related to enrollment projections.
Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department.
Projections must be detailed at various levels,district total, school-building totals, grade
level and program level to include vocational and special education students.
7'he basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis
of a group that hasa common statistical value{grade level)as it progresses through time.
In a stable population the cohort would be I.00 for all grades. This analysis uses
historical information to develop averages and project the averages forwazd. T'his
method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each
grade level. T'he district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted
factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are
cotnmon,student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases
survival rates. Entry grades(kindergarten)are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The
disVict collects information on birth rates within the districYs census tracts,and treats
these staristics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment:in the appropriate years.
The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting
student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollmenu are evaluated below.
The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasu. T'hese
are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections.vary depending on the number of
yeazs of historical information and how they are weighted.
A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that
allows the user to project independently at school orgrade level and to aggregate these
projections for the district level. The Enrollment Master� software provides statistical
methods including trend line, standard grade progression(cohort)and combinations of
these methods.This software produces a five-yeaz projection of school enrollment.
In December 2006,the District wntracted a demographer to develop projections for the
Federal Way School District. The report was complete in January 2007. The model used
to forecast next yeaz's enrollment nses cohort survival rates to measure grade to gade
growth, assumes mazket shaze losses to private schools(consistent with county-wide
average), assuines growth froin new housing or losses due to net losses from migation.
This forecast was provided as a range of three projections.. The long-range forecast
provided with this repoR used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based
on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King Counry. Most of the methods used
for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrolLnent is a constant percent of
20
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN__
something else(e.g. population)or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend foi
the:school-age population over time.The report included 5 different calculations to
piovide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2017. This model
produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low,
medium and high range modes. This provides;a reasonable range for long-range planning
arid is consistent with estimates from various models.
Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities aze a modification ofthe
cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther
out the projections are made. The Federal Way Sohool District long-range projecrions
are studied annually. The:study includes information from the jurisdiotional
demographers as they project future housing and popularion in the region.The long-range
projections used by Federal Way Public:Schools reflect a similar age trend in student
populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the
State of WasHington.
Neaz term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by currdnt
local economic conditions. Cuttent economic conditions do appear to beaffecting.
enrollment. This"is reflected in the DistricYs projections. The District tracks new
development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a sfudent
yield from propbsed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns:
Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenry years. The
Federal Way School District'is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions
comprising the school distriot geography. These projections create a vision oEthe school
district community in the future.
21
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Full Time Equivalent Enrollment:History and Projections
Simplified FfE(K Headm�mt=.5 FIE;Middle School FTE=.99 Hmdmunt;High School FTE=.933Headwunt)
Toml K-12 aca!
CalmdarYr Se6oalVnr Elwm MidmeSchoal A' hSchod FfE Chmr e
2006 2005-06 9,105 � 5,309 6,770 21,184
2007 2006-07 9,022 5,261 � 6,754 21,03� RT.6
2008 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,716 I.S%
2009 2008-09 $865 S,I55 6,456 20,476 L2'/e
2010 2009-10 8;738 5,119 6,594 20,451 l:b�
20I1 2010.11 8;753 5,142 6,544 2Q439 -0.1%
2012 BJ071-II 8.759 5./66 6.425 20,350 .I•/.
2013 P20J1-13 8,848. 5,1/8 6,385 20,351 RO'.6;
2014 P10T3-14 8,948 5,093 Q396 20,437 RI%
2015 P207�GlS 9,034 5,138� � Q363 20,535 QS%
2016 P10ISJ6 9.111 .5,2J5 6,370 20,646 QS%,
2017 P207617 9,215 5,258 6,284 20,757 0.5%
2018 P1017-/8 9,310 .5,186 Q39I 20,890 R6%�
ElemmmryK-5 MiddleSduoo!6-8' H)gh Schoo!9-17
z2.0o0 Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast
s7,aoo -
zo,000 '
�
�s,000 i
18,000
I
17,000
16,000 �
_J �
� � __ '_ " _ " _
5A �
� '8� `b � �iR �q ��''oi �o� �o� �o� ��i 'ap! �aol
� �'.+ �7v 'o '� a N'� �p �m 'c� �'� �'w
School Ymr
OF7E
zZ
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOL&2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Caoaciry Summaries
All Grades,Elementary,Middle School,and High Schools
The, Capaciry Summaries combine Building Capaciry information and the Student
Forecast information. The resulY demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled
facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim
measu'es.
The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire
District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of studenu at elementary, middle
scfiool,and high school levels individually.
Thenotes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are
in place each year. •
23
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACIfY SUMMARY-AI.L GRADFS
Bud et -- Pro' cted--
CalendarYear 2012 1A13 2014 2015 2016 2017 ?A18
CAPACI7'1' School Year 201I-I2 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2011r17 2017-18
BUQDAIGPROCRAM
HEADCOIINT CAPACI7'Y 19,567 19,667 19,667 19,667 19,867 19,867 19,867
FfECAPACITY 1A,0119 20,109 ?A,109 1A.109 7A,309 1A,309 20.309
Add or subtract changes W capacity
rs,,�� � � �� '� � � � ,.�, ,.,;��I �1;;?.
" :�;!
�� ! �: ' � i ;i' I
��I : . � ' . :; �.�4 �7
lncrease Capaciq�-[akeland and Sunnycrest i 100; " � ;` � � ' � �i �
i � � �
Increase Capacit}•at Federal Way}LS � � � �• . . ; �, � �2D0 i ,��, ' � ,,; i ' ' ! -
.....:. . .......... ......_...17.. . ........� ....,.._ ...4...
Ad'ustedPro ramHeadcount ac' 19,667 19,667 14,667 19,867 19,861 19,867 19,861
Ad' stedPro F7'E ac' 2QI09 1A;109 ?A,109 20,309 1A,309 20,309 20,309 .
IIVItOLLMdVT
BasicFTEEnmllment 20,3�0 1A,351 20,437 1A,535 20,646 1A,757 20,890
IntemetAcadearyEnroliment(AAF 31 31� (31 315 31� (31 31�
BasicFTEEnrollmentwithoutlntemetAcade 20,035 20,036 7A,122 7A22Q 20,331 1A,442 1A,575 .
SDBPLl�OR iSID
PBOGRAMFfECAPACII'Y 74 73 3 89 2 33 66
RII.00ATABLECAPACTfY
�rrent Portable Capaciry 2,300 2,325 2,325 2,325 2,275 2,275 2,275
DeductPortabkCapacrtY �,(�� � °a [lE,.::.� �;j�; �kl� :;,��)'1 ��°�,.i��: �E° „ial �" ��'��
i: i ouio��. t �iii �i i �:ro i �in:� i oirF.
AddNewPortableCapacity �'•50 , ' � � � "� � � "' " '
,�
� �� . � �� ,� ��„ � .x � �� :
j': � ' It- � li�,, : � 'II: ��a
..._ . . I .. I.....J. ... •..... .... ........ 1 1 .....IJLI l IL .::
Ad' skd Portab6e ac' 2,325 2,325 2,375 ?,275 .2,275 J,275 2,275
SURPLi�OR(DNHOI$ID)
PROCdIAM AND RIIA CATABLE
CAPAGffY 2,399 2�98 _2,312 2,364 2,253 2,142 2,009
24
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACITY SUMM1fARY-II.F]VQ�]VTARY SCHOOIS
Bud et - Pro'ected--
Calendar Year 2012 2013 7A14 20I5 2016 2017 2018
CAPACITY SchoolYeaz 201t-12 2012-t3 2013-14 201415 2015-16 201617 2017-18
BUII.DINGPROQ2AM
HEAD COUNT CAPACITY __ 8,621 &721 8,721 8,721 R721 8,721 5,721
F1'ECAPACITY 62t 721 721 'I21 721 721 721
L Increaze Capacity Lakeiand
and Sunn c�est 100
Ad'usted Aro ram Headcount Ca ac' 8.711 8,T21 &721 8,721 8,721 &721 8,721
Ad' sted Pro FTECa acrt &721 &721 &711 8,721 &7Z1 &721 &�1
INROLLMFN'P
BasicFTEFnrollment &759 &848 8,948 9,034 9,111 9,215 9,310
2. Intemet Acadertry(AAFTE) _ (36) (3� (3 (� � (3 (3�
Basic FTE Fnrolhnent wahout Intemet Acade &723 &812 &912 &998 9 075 9.179 9174
SURPLIJS OR(UNHOUSm)
PROGRAMCAPACl11' 2 9l 191 277 354 458 S53
RFI.00ATABLECAPACII'Y 3.
Current Portable Capacity 775 800 800 800 800 800 800
Subtrnct single portable finm M'vror Lake (25)
Add double octabk to M'aror Lelce 50
Ad' sted Portabk Ca ac' 800 800 800 800 &!0 800 800
SURPLI�OR(UNHOLLSID)
PROGRAM AIYD RFLOCATABLE
CAPACIfY 79S 709 609 523 446 342 247
N07'6:
L Increase Capacity at Lakeland,and Sunnycrest
2. Intemet Academy students are included in projections but do not requ've Tull tirte use ofschool facilities.
3. ReWcatab�e Capacrty is based on the number of portables available and other administrntive techniques which
can be used[o temporanly house students until pertnanent facil¢ies are available.This is a cakulated number oniy.
The actual number ofportables that wi0 be used will be based on actual student popuLUion noeds.
The District may begin to pu0 portabtes from the instructional mventory. Age and condition of the portables
will detemtine feasbility forcontmued instructional use.
25
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACIL[TIES PLAN
CAPACffYSUMMARY-11�DLESCROOLS
Bu et -- Pro� ated--
CalendarYear 2012 ?A13 1A14 ?A15 2(p6 7A17 2018
CAPACfIY SchoolYear 2011-12 2012-13 1A13-14 2f11415 1AISl6 201�17 JA17-18
BUQDINGPROCdtAM
HFADCOUNTCAPACffY-------___._ _5,361 5,367 _5�6/_ _5,361_ 5,36/ 5,367 5,367
FfECAPAC[7'Y 5,421 5,421 5,421 5,421 5421 5,421 5,421
Add or subtcact changes in capacity
Ad'usted Pro ram Headcount Ca ac' S,367 5,367 5,361 5,36/ 5,367 5,367 5,367
Ad' stedPro ramF7'E ac' S,421 5,421 5,421 5,421 5,421 5,421 5,421
DNRR01,111�1VT
BasicFlEFnroltrnent 5,166 5,118 5,093 5,138 5,215 5,258 5,286
1. Intemet Acede AA 74 (� 74 (74) �4 4 (74)
BasicFfEEnrollmentwithoutlntemetAcade 5,092 5.044 5,019 5,064 5,141 5,184 5112
SURPLLS OR([ANE�iSID)
PRO(�tAMCAPACfIY 329 377 402 357 280 237 209
RIIACATABLECAPACf11' 2
CLrtent Portabk Capacdy 575 575 575 575 575 575 575
AddlSubtract ortable ac'
Ad' sted Portable Ca ac' S75 575 575 575 575 575 575
SURPLiJS OR(UIVftOL6m)
PROGRAM AND RII.00ATABLE
CAPACrfY 904 95Z 977 932 S55 S12 784
NOTFS:
t. Intemet Academy students are mcluded'm projections but do not require full time use of school facilities.
2. Rebcatable Capacity u bued on the numberofportabks availabk and otheradmmistrative techniques which
can be used to temporarily house students unt�7 permanent facilities are availeble.This is a cakulated number only.
1'he actual number of portables that wil]be used will be baied on actual student populazion nceds.
The District may begin to pull portables from the mstructional mventory. Age and cond'¢ion ofthe portables
w71 dMertmne feasb�lity for contmued'msuuctioual use.
26
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
CAPACII'Y SUMMARY-F�GH SCHOOIS
Bud e[ - Pro'ected--
CalendarYear 7Al2 2QI3 7A14 20I5 Z(116 7AI7 7AI8
CAPACITY School Year 7A11-12 7Albl3 1A13-14 7AI4I5 1A1S16 7A1617 1A17-18
BUQ..DINGPROCil2AM
HEADCOi7NTCAPAG77'Y 5,579 5,579 5,579 5,579 5,779 5,779 5,T19
FTE CAPACftY 5.967 5.96� 5,9G/ 5.96% 6,167 6,167 6,167
Add or subtmct changes in capacrty
Add capacity to Federal Way HS 200
Ad' sted Pro ram Headcount Ca ac' S,579 5,579 5 579 5 779 5 779 5,779 5 779
Ad'ustedPro FI'ECa ac' S.967 5967 5,967 167 6,167 6,167 6,I67
INROLLh1FNT
Basic FfE Enrollment 6,425 6,385 6,396 Q363 6,320 6,284 6,294
l. Intemet Acade AA (?A� 205 ?AS � 205 � (7A5)
Basic Fd whhout InumetAcade 6,220 4180 6.191 6,t58 6,115 G079 6,089
SURPLLS OR LSID
PROGRAMCAPACITY 53 13 24 9 SI 88 78
RFLOCATABLEGPACfIY 2
C�rrent Portable Capacity 950 950 950 950 900 9(10 900
Add/Subtract portable capaciry
Subuactportable capacity at Federnl Way ELS �SOL
Ad' sted Portable Ca ac' 950 950 950 900 900 900 9D0
SURPLIS OR(UIVHOISID)
PRO(7tAM AND RIIACATABLE
3. CAPACl7Y 697 737 726 909 952 988 978
NOT6:
1. Intemet Academy students arc included in projectims bu[do not requ'vc&II t'vrc use of school facdities.
2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number ofportables avaJable and other administmtive techniques which
can be used to temporarily house students until pemmnent faeiGti�s arc available.This ic a ca�ulated numberonly.
The actual number of po�tabks that will be used will be based on actual studcnt population needs.
The District may begm to pull portables from the instructional inventory•. Age and condition of the portables
will detemune feasibility for contmued'ms Wc[ional use.
3. Capaciry for unhoused students will be acco�minda[ed with trnvelmg teachers and
no plannmg['vrc m some class�ooms.
27
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Kin¢Countv:the Citv of Federal Wav.and the Citv of Kent Impact Fee Calculations
Single and Multi-Family Residences
Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees
to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities.
To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was
established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A•and was substantially
adopted by the Ciry of Federal Way and Kent. ' The formula requires the District to
establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be
added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some
standard construction costs,which aze unique to that district.
- STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS
Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for
single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2012 Capital Facilities
Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units that were
constructed in the IasYfive(5)years.
=IMPACT FEE CALCULATION
Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee
Calculation for single family and multi-family units based,on King County Code 21 A and
the Gmwth Management Act.
➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 12
months.
Plan Year 2012 Plan Year 2011
Single Eamily Uniu" $4,014 $4,014
Mulri-Famil Units $1 53 - �2,172
"Due to current economic c.onditions, Federal Way Public Schools has made the decision
to retain the impact fee for Single Family Units at the 201 I rate instead ofthe updated
2012 rate of$4,461.
28
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
STUDGNTGENERATION -
� t�W CONSTRIICTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS . �
Single Famlly 5tudent Generedon
Numbero} Numberot Number of Number of Num6er oi Elamentary Middle 8chool Hlgh School Total
Single Family Multl-Famity Elementary Middle School Hgh SchooY Student Student Student Student
DEVELOPMENT Dwellin a � DweIG StudeMS Students StudeMs Factor Factor Factor Factor
11 Bri hton Park 15� �0 9 2 �2 0.6000 � 0.1333 " - �0.1333 0:8668 �
11 TheGieen � .. - 13 . . . 0� . '8 3 1� 0.6154� � 02308 - 0.0769 0.9231
10 CreeksideLene 34 0�, 10 .3- �8 02941 �0.0882 0.2353 0.6176 .
(10)Garidevsta 27 -0 12 9 6 0.4444 �•0.3333 - 02722 0.9999
(09)Lakota Qest- 43 0 12 7 � 3� �- 02791 � - 0.1826 0.0�8 0.5717 �
(09 Tuscan 22 0 9 3 - 3 0.4091 0.1364 �0.1364 0.6819 ��
(OB)NoAhlake fPodge IV 92 0 28 14 20 0.3043 0.15Y2 �0.2174 0.6T39
(OB)Colingtoee Park 41 0 21 9 7 0:5122 -. .. .02195 , 0.17W 0.9024
07 Colella Estates 87 0 33 14 23 0.3793 0.1609 0.2644 0.8048
07)Wooc�rodc 175 0 40 27 42 01286 0.1543 0.2400. 0.5229
� Tofal 9 0 � 9
Student0eneretbn•� � � O.J315 0.1858 -0.2095 0.7087
'Student Genera[ion rate is based on tMals. .
Mu@4-Famfly Student Generallon
Bementa MiddleSdiool H' hSclaol Total
AWwm 0.124� 0.056 0.052 0232 :
- Is � ��uah _0.073. 0.025 0.042 0:140 �
KeM . . U.331 0.087 OA24 - � -0.522
LaI�Washington 0.062� 0.019 0�.016 0.097 �
Average 0.148 OA42 OA59 0.?b6
29
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IM PA CT F EE�.
.Sc6001S8eAcqueitbnCosh Student SWdrnt
Facility Cost/ Facility � Factor Facinr Cost/ CosU
Ac¢a e. Acre_ _ _ Ca -aci -. SFR. MFR SFR. MFR _ .
Elemeatary � 0:3315 �9.1480 - �SO � .50
. .. _ . _. _ ._ __..
Middle Schoo� � 0.1658 0.0420 ao . .ao
HighSchool 4.85 52�16718 51 0.2095 0.0590 54,313 . 51,215
TOTAL �S4 13 51215�
Sc600lConstructionCoah Studrnt Sadent
% Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor. Facwr Cost/ CosU�
TofalS �Ft Cost Capaciry SFR MFR SFR MFR
Elementary 95.90% � �0.3315 0.1480 $0 SO
Middle School 94J6% � 0:1658 0.0420 �.$0 �.SO
High School 96.53% �SI0,530,000 200 0.2095 �0.0590 510,647� 52,999
� TOTAL 510.547 52,999
Temponry Facility CosC Student Sadent
- °✓dTemp Fac. FacBity Facil¢y Facror Facwr Costl CosV�
Toral S Ft Cost Size SFR. MFR SFR MFR
Elemenmry 4.10% !E199.832 25 9.3315 0.1480 5109 . __yi9
Middle School 5.24% 0.1658 0.0420 - -
High School 3.47% 0:2095 0.0590 '
TOTAL 5109 Sd9
Stau Matching Credit 6alculatioe: Studem Sadent
Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State �Factor Factnr CosU CosU
Alloca6on/S Ft Smdent Match SFR MFR SFR Mf7t
Elementary 5180.17 0.3315 0.1480 .f0 SO
�Middk�School 5180.17� 0.1658 0.0420 SO - SO
High School 5180.I7 �130 62.53% 0.2095 0.0590 S3 068 5864
Total $3,068 5964
Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR
Avorege Assessed Value (March 2011) L257,849 $74,692
Capital Bond Interest Rete(March 2011) 4.91% 4.91%
Net Presrnt Value of Average Dweliing 51,999,773 5379,281
Years Amortized - 10 ]0
Property7ax�Lery Rnte 51.54 � 51.54
PreeentValueofReveoueStream 53079 5892
SingleFam�y MolttFamUy
Residencee Rexidentts
Mitigatiou Fee Summary
Site Acquisitioo Cost .S 4;313 .S 1,2I5
Permanent FaciGty Cost S 10,647 5 2.999
Temparary Facility Cost S d09 S 49
� State Match Credit - S (3,068) S (864)
Tax Payment Credit S __(3,079) E (892)
Sub-Toml S .8,922 S 2,506.
50%LocalShaze �E -0,461 S 1,253
alculated�lm actFee 5� - _-4�461 S 1� 53 �
012 Ima -ct Fee .... . . _�.S � �4 014 S 1,253 '
30
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SECTION 4
SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2011 CAPTTAL FACII.ITIES PLAN
The 2012 Capital Facilities Plaa is an updated document, based on the 20 Cl Capital
FacilitiesPlan. The changes between the 2011 Plan and the 2012 Plan are listed tielow.
SECTION I -THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
The Six Yeaz Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2012-2018
SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION
CAPACITY �
Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every
elementary schooL Changes to the Building.Program Capacities calculation ace found on
page 17.
PORTABLES
The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between faoilities or new
portables purohased. Portable Locations can be found on page 19.
STUDENT FORECAST
7'he Student Forecast now covers 2012 through 2018 Enrollment history and projections '
' are found on page 22.
CAPACITY SUMIVIARY
The changes in the Capaciry Summary aze.a reflection of the changes in the capacities
and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at cunent buildings are shown
as increases to capacity. Capaciry Summaries are found on pages 24-27.
IIVIPACT FEE CALCULATION-KING COUNTY CODE 21A
The Impact .Fee Galculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The
adjustrnent made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee
between the 2011 Capi;al Facilities Plan and the 2012 Capital Facilities Plan can be
found on page 32 and 33.
31
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2011 TO 2012
STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS
Student Generarion factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a
period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in
student Generation factors beriveen the 20I1 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2012 Capital
Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of
_
the developmenu and the yeat placed in the survey. The Stadent Generation worksfieet
is found on page29.
SCNOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
The cmticipated cost based on 2006 estimates for replacing Federal Way High u
$81,000,000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The cumeru capaciry of
Federal Way HiRh rs 1538: The addition of 200 seats wil!rncrease capacity by 13%.
Tota!Cos1 SS1,000,000 z.13=SIq533,000
SCHOOL ACOUISIfION COST5
The district purchased the Norman CenterTO house the Employment Transition Program
mtd aJ a later date the ECEAP program. The purohase and use of this site increased our
high school capacity by 51 students.
Totdl Cost $2,100,000/2=$1,050,000
The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2012 Capital Facilities
Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary ffom year to year as programs are
added or changed and construction wst may increase over time.
32
FEDERAL WAY PUBLIG SCHOOLS 2012 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2011 TO 2012
iMPACT FEE
Item From/To Comment
Percent of Permanent 95.71%to 95.16% Report#3 OSPI
Facilities
4:29%to 4.84% Updated portable inventory
Percent Temporary Facilities
Average Cost of Portable $183,996 to$199,832 Updated average of portables
Classroom ' purchased and placed in 2010
Constrqction Cost Alfocation ,$180.17 to$180.17 Change effective July 2010
State Match 61.86%to 62.53% Change effective July 2011
Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational
$267,668 to $257,849 ServiceDistrict (ESD 121)
MFR—
$84,429 to$74,692
Capital Bond Interest Rate 433%to 4.91% Mazket Rate
Property Tax Levy Rate $1.72 to$1.54 King Counry Treasury Division
Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory
Elementary 3507 to.3315
Middle School .1701 to.1658
High School .2236 to:2095
Multi-Family Student Yield Updated County-Wide Average
Eleinentary .1650 to.148
Miildle School .0530 to.042
High School .0640 to.059
Imp3ct Fee SFR— Due to current economic oondirions,
$4,014 to$4,014 SFR retained at 2011 rate.
(Calculated 2012 SFR$4,461)
MFR— MFR based on the updated
$2,172 to$1,253 calculation
33
� rJ i J �
� � � �r � 0 [ ; ' � f -, �
� � J � � � � � JJ
J �
�
d �
� ��. � �� � ��� . ��� � �
�; � i � j����� ��; � ��; �� � � � ��� �'�'� 1� � � J �
� � v
�`K
�
��j ' �� �-._ I°�'� '.
�' � I
' �..� '_ _�
� �.
� ....— _ --,.-�.� - ,
__. . 1�..-�-=.y�-'- .� �a�' r-
o�ap�► �: ml�l • �. �� � �,�..
Ma n a .,•: ' { .
� �'� ��� �i :�I �� " �
— ..,_ ; �' I �,_.
_ �
� .7^n� ':ri. , e �.� i.� $ � i �� �i�� �ir-1 ��.
' . � '' �!3 i
..3 ._.._
.�,,,�� .�,... �
__ _� --
�---- ` _ ---- - - - -
._._.---
�- � , '
__
��� �� y �:; `
� -a� .,� � x, �; �..
� - ��' '
r� J � � � , � �, , � , ,
� - � � i� i -i i i
� . i - � �
� i � i �
.
i r I i � i � i ' i �' i i �� i i � �
� / �
. �. :� -
� ' �
_ , ; - -
Kerrt School District No.415
12033 SE256'"Street
Kent,Washington 98030-6643
(253)373-7295
SIX - YEAR CAPITAL FACILIT9ES PLAN
. 2011 - 2012 � 2016 -2017
� .
�
KENT
���
o�srn�cr
BOARD of DIRECTORS .
' Bill Boyce
Jim Berrios
. . Tim Clark
Karen DeBruler
' Debbie Straus
ADMINISTRATION
Dr. Edward Lee Vargas—Superintendent
Dr. Richard A. Stedry—Chief Business Officer
Dr. Linda Del Giudice— Chief Accountability Officer
Dr. Merri Rieger—Chief Student Achievement Officer
Dr.Brent Jones—Ghief Talent Officer
Thuan Nguyen—Chief Information &Automated Operations Officer
Chris Loftis— Executive Director, Communications&School Community Partnerships
Kerrt School DlstriG Six-Year Capital FadtiUes Plan qpril 2011.
_ _ � - � -
- - -- �
� �
�
�
KENT
��i
DISTA[Ci
SIX- YEAR CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2011 - 2012 � 2016 - 2017
April 2011
For information on the Plan, please cail the
Finance 8�Planning Department at (253) 373-7295
Capital Facilities Plan
Contributing Staff
Gwenn Escher-Derdowski
Enrollmerrt&Planning Administrator
Ralph Fortunato, CSBS—lnterim Director for Fiscal Services
Debbi Smith, Business Servlces Department
Fred Long;Supervisor of Facilities&Construction
Kada Wilkerson, FaalRies DepaRmeM.
Don Walkup, Supervisor of Transportation Department
Maps by Jana Tudcer, IT-Graphic Designer
Kent School Dishict Siz-Year CepiWl FadllOies Plan Aprtl 2011
� _ � -
� � ; ,
" � ' il -
Si,�2'ear Capitat FaciCities �lan
7a6Ce of Contents
Section Page Number
I Executive Summary 2
I I Six-Year Enrollment Projection & History 4
I [ I District Standard of Service 9
I V Inventory, Capacity 8� Maps of Existing Schools 12
V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan 15
V I Relocatable Classrooms 18
V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 19
V I I [ Finance Plan, Cost Basis and impact Fee Schedules 24
I X Summary of Changes to PreVious Plan 31
X Appendixes 32
Kent Sehool DistriG Six-Year Capital Fatllities Plan April 2011
� _
I Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan°) has,been prepared 6y the Ker�t
School District (the "District'� as the organization's facilifies planning document,
in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act,
King County Code K.C.C. 27A.43 and Cities af Kent, CoVington, Au6um, Renton,
Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan. update was
prepared using data availa6le in the spring of 2011 for the 2010-2011 school
year.
This Plan is consisterrt with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by fhe
Kent School District. This Flan is not intended to tie the sole.planning document
for all of the DistricPs needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long
Range Capital Facilides Plans consistent with Boarii Policies, taking into account
a longer or shorter time period, other factors and.trends in the use of facilfties,
and other needs of the Districf asmay be required.
Prior Capital Facilities Plans of-the Kent School District have been adopted by
Metropolitan King County_Counal and Cities of Kerrt, Covington, Aubum and
Renton and included in the Capitaf Facilities Plan element of the Comp�ehensive
Plans of each jurisdictiart. The first ordinance implementing impact fees for the.
unincorporated areas ofKent School District was effective Septemberl5, 1993.
In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent
School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must.adopt this Plan and a
fee-implementing ordinance fo�the District. For impact fees to be collected in the
incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Aubum and
Renton musY also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances.
This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and
SeaTac.
This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standaM of service in order to ascertain
curreM and future capacity. VVhile the State Superintenderrt of Public Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, ttiose guidelines do not
account for local program. needs in the District. The Growth Management Act,
King County and City ootles and ordinances authorize the District to make
adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of
the District.
This Plan includes the standard of service as establisfied by Kent School District.
Program capacity is based om an average capacity and updated to reflect
changes to special programs served in each building. Relocatables in the
capacity calculation use the same standard of :service as the permanent
faoilities.
. . . . {conunued)
KeM Sehool Dlstrkt Slx-Year Capital Facilttlea Plan Aprll 2011 Pege 2
I Executive Summary ��o�n��oa�
The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District
standard of service and the existing inyentory of permanent facilities: The
DistricYs program capacity of permanent facilfties reflects program changes and
the reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School
_ _
District: Relocatables provide additional transitional capacity until permanent .
facilities are completed.
Kent School District is the fourth largest district in the state. Enrollment is
electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Fublic
Instruction (OSPI) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on
Annual Average Fult Time Equivalent (AAFTE), Enrollment on October 1 is a
widely recognized "snapshot in time" that is used to report the DistricYs
enrollment for the year.as reported to OSPI —the Office of the Superintendent of
Public lnstruction.
P=223 FTE reports Kindergarten at..5 for all elementary schools except those five
schools with Full Day Kindergarteri funded by State Apportionment. P-223
Reports include all students in Gredes K — 12 and excludes Early Childhood
Eaucation [ECE] students and college-only Running Start students.
The Board of Directors has approved. Full Day Kindergarten for all Elementary
Schools for 2011-12 and those projections are continued in future years.
The DistricYs standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of
transRional facilities are reviewed in detail.in various sections of tfiis Plan. The
District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the
transitional use of relocatables.
A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the DistricYs
ability to implement this Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth
Management Act, this Plan will be updated annually with changes in the fee
schedules adjusted accordingly.
�
Kent SUOOI DisMct Six-Year Capital Fadldlas Plan Aprll 2011 Page 3
II Six -Year Enrollment Projection
For capital facilities pfanning, growth projections are based on cohort survival
and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the
next six years. �s� renr� z� The student generetion factor, as defined on the next
page, is the basis for the growth projections from n"ew developmen4s.
King Gounty live births and_.the DistricYs relational pe[centage average were
used to determine the number of kinde�gartners entering the system. �s�e ran� ,�
8:134%0 of 24,244 King Courrty live births in 2006 is projected for 1,972 students
expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2011, This is a significant increase of
1,564 live births in King County over the previous year. Together with
propbrtional growth from new construction, 8.134% of King County births is
equivalent to the number of students projected to enter kindergarten in the
district for the next six-year period.cs�r,we�
Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") programs at all 28 elementary schools require an
adjustmerrt to the Kindergarten forecast for projec4ing FDK at 1.0 FTE for capital
facilities planning. P-223 Repoits will continue to include FDK students at 1.0 for
five schools with FDK funded bystate apportionment; and all other kindergarten
students will continue to be reported at .50 FTE. cs�r�sA�
Early Childhood Education students (also identified as "ECE", "Preschool Special
Educatian [SE] or handicapped students") are forecast and reported separately.
Capacity is reserved to serve the ECE programs at seven elementary schools.
The first grade population is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten
population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens.
Cohort survival method uses hisforical enrollment data to forecast the number of
students projected for the fol�owing year.
Near term projections assume some growth from new developments to be offset
by current local economic conditions. With notable exceptions, the expectation is
that enrollment increases will occur District-wide in the long tertn. District
projections are based on historical growth patterns oombined with continuing
development of projects in the pipeline dependent on markeUgrowth conditions.
The District will continue to track new development acti4ity to determine impact
to schools and monitor conditions to reflect adjustments in this assumption. The
six-year enrollment projection anticipates moderate enrollment growth from new
development currently in some;phase of planning or cons4ruction in 4he district.
Information on new residential developments and the completion of these
proposed developments in all jurisdictions may be considered in the DistricYs
future analysis of growth projections.
� - � � � � (ConHnued) �
, Kent Scnool DlsMct Six-Year Capltal FaGlltles Plan ApAI 2011 Papa�4 �
I I Six -Year Enroliment Projection �co�a��
Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed deyelopments.
The Kent School District serves seven permitting jurisdictions' unincorporated
King County, the cities_ of Kent, Covington, Aubum and Renton and smaller
portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. The west
Lake Sawyer area of Kent School Districf is in the city of Black Diamond.
STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR
"Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a
school distrid to describe how many students of each grade,span are expected
to 6e generated by a.dwelling unit" based on district records of aVerage actual
student generated rates for developments compteted within the last five,years.
Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School Disfict is
as follows:
Single Family Elementary .486 �
Middle School .130
Senior High .250
Total .866
Multi-Family Elementary .331
Middle School .067
Senior High .124
Total _522 ,
The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,023 single family
dwelling units and 1,527 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustmenf for
occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capital Facilities
Plan for details of the Student Generation Factor survey.
The actual number of students in those residential developments was
determined using'the DistricYs Education Logistics (EDULOGj TransporNation
System which provides an accurate count of enrolled students in identifiable new
developmeM areas.
Kent Sehool DIsMG Six-Year Capttal FaGlkies Plan April 2071 Page.5
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICL No.415
OCTOBER P 223 F T E(Full Time Equlvalent)ENROLLMENT HIBTORY '
lB=LNsBIMa �BY�19B5 LBti/9BB lBt�1981 LBIn19B8181n19B91BF1880 LBInIBBt LB„19�LBi�19&i 1Bh198��18FIpp5'L8M1998 LBn199)LB„1BYB LBIn1BB8 LBFIOW tBIn2Jp1��tB0��0Ut 1H11206t lBh]OW lBM7W5
OdaberPfEEnmtlmem 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 7998 2000 2007 1002 2003 2004 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009� 2010
�c�pcwmyweemna� te.ezs ta.ess 20.N9 z�,zea zz.xi za.ia za.00x za.tee a2.sss apm zi.e�� 27.573 zi.ws � zz,zts x2oo� azae� ai.ne st.es� nAai �zz.e�s 22.880
Ifltleme/DeCeem 857 17� I50 B!0 1,252 587 .702 188 -03� -9�5 -19J .2N 7J 568 -205 I80 -7W 85 588 W -78�
�avron/anhw� 8.88% 9.49% 9.40% 9.07% 8.47% 8.54% 8.44% 8.36% 827% 8.58% 825% 8.41% 8.06% 8.05% 8.33% 8.47% 822% 828% 8.47% 6.32% 8.13%
IGfldefgart@��"2'3 880 919 982 885 �955 987 871 972 825 9/2 900 9W 873 B9� 917 943 895 908 788 758 749
Ste[eApporfionmenbPo�edFullDaylOndergarten�'z"�.�P'u'"'P0"�q"Tfon°"'°a°"-M1itlatli�Daj'q � 3g5 3gg 3q3
Grade 1 1.852 1,945 2.029 2.017 1.967 1.975 2,152 2,085 2,084 1,989 2.089 1.938 1.922 1.851 1.894 1938 2003 1873 182f1 1958 1992
Gtede 2 1,773 1.9M 7,898 2.O/B 1.9a7� 2.011 7,879 2.199 2.095 2,W8 2.075 2.087 1.938 1,985 1.838 1881 1998 2045 1818 7987 7838
Grede 3 , 1.824. .7,868 1.950 1.972 1�.985 1.959� 2.025� 2.058 �2.208 2.111 2,088 .2.000 �2,055 1,975 2.020 1982 2028 2033 2081 1878 2000
Gretle 4- . , 1;79:1 1,918� 1,800 1.8�9 1�.942 2.012� 1.988 2.081 �2.045 2,t22 2.088� �2.166 2,088 �2,072 2,0.57 2021 2015 2048 2060 2M4� 1954
Gfede 5• 7�.T02 � 7,885 1.8N. 1.807 1.899 �1.924 1.988 2,023 2.108 ,2.037 .2,251� �.2.109 2.1{9 -2.087 .2.102 2090 2051 2020 ZO/4. 2088�. 2082
G2de� 8� . 1.829 1.733 1.885 1.851 . 1.915 1.895� 1,821 2.038 �2.d15. �2.119 2.058 2253 2.151 2.205 2,139 27W 2101 2088 2081 21q0 2130
- Gfede 7 7.824 1,720 1.812 1.815 1.996 1.925 1.899 7,982 2.OB3 2.081 2.I08 2.727 2.380 2.209 2,243 2200 2205 2130 2117 2118 2092
Gtade 8 7.545 1,628 1.M1 1.799 1.882 1.941 7.927 7,936 7.970 2,015 2.033 2.754 2.079 2.351 2,227 2283 2254 2184 2143 2168 2151
Grade 9-JUnbrl9q� 7.483 1,612 1.889 1.718 7.8(q 1.891 1.983 1,937 1.925 2.702 �2,208 2.2�6 2.404 2,309
G�ade '9-SenrorHqh ' 2,705 2767 2772 2580 2573 2167 .2434
Grade 1D . 7,:�68_ 1./8U 7.883� 1,898 7�.690 1:765 1,857 7.977 1.953 2.D15 2.113 2.064. 2,039 2207 Y.124 2173. 2212 247/, 2215 � 2213 - 2233� .
Grede�17' �1.380 1:400 �1.409 1.537 1.529. 1.806 1,881 1;T97 7.8�9 1,782� 1'.770 1.895 1.823 1.787 7,907 1799 1887 1882� 1968'. 1956� 1949
Gfede 12 �1,202 7;255 1,280 1.3�0. 1.368 1.130 7.185� 1.SW 1.832� 1,537 1,�32 1,M0 1,475 1.168� 1,M8 117T 1�51 1�91 '15/9 1619' 1673
talalFivc�nan� 20,135 21,312 22222 2Y,803 �72.794 23.323 23,792 24,560 24,882 25,080 2b,238 25,344 25,354 Y5,35B 25,770 25,809 25,884 25,715 25,828� 25,778. 25,821
Ymy FTE
Increafe/Deueax g7g 1,778 B09 582 -10 529 48H 78B 722 778 778 108 9 1 472 79 55 -118 83 -50 -767
CumileWelntteafe 916 2,09! �,003 �,585 3,575 4.704 1,674 5,3N 5,663 6,8l1 8,079 8,726 6,735 8,7�0 8,652 6,591 6,BOB 6,St7 8,8f0 8,580 8,�0�
� FfE enmlmeM couMS lieve been mun0ed b Cro riea�eat Wnb numEer.Mosf qM�gelm ediOeMS aro rtpoME al S F7E Mho�qh motl ekmeMxy eNOOb naw porMe aomelu0 AeY�po0�.
� To m�mCU NQ�eatee actuW EhUu in IOn9��Y 6 WN W�b enmomart Y�ae uptlaleE W qn9 CouMYlbeM OaP�KenlSdiool Obtritl Pe���basa7 an xtutl q�Ma9�^eruahneM 5 yeen bW.
� Slm�hq n 2008.q�n YW�b me mpalea et/.O(wre m hea7wunl)a15 sqaab wMCli Wa0fie0/a FW DnP�9a�(FDq MiOatl tluaup�Slele AVPO�maA. Sae T�le 2A Aor FuE Day KeiAeryaMn detN.
Far Fd�ey IGMmqmlen d Nhs erAnds.lhe eecaN MO Nlhe Aay e/undog A'FeEerel6 SaM CNeO?��9�a W�d�6 nudenu ae'epwled a1.5 FfE on tla P.Y23 EmoFneM Repat ahkh perorates�nteM1mdog.
� EnmAmeM mpaled M Ihe etele m Form P.227 gdroretaa baak aAucatim fimduq eM eWutlea EeAy CNAiaod Eduratim�('ECE'8 R7 a BMh b 4 Prexliod Spedd EEuution)eM m9epanny Rwmkq SIM 6hN1aMe.
Ocrober t010 P•22317eatlmunl=28,870 6 Fu0 HeedwuM=P7,5t9. FuA HeadcouM i�wiWef KinOerge�lm,Ea�Fj Chidhood Educetion 8 mhpe-only Rumiin9 Slert slWenl�e11.0 HeeEauN.
Kansmoao�sn�-r�c�aF�.rm� Table 1 rvwxon v�.e
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICTNO.4�5
SIX-YEAR F T E ENROLLMENT PROJECTION
State-fimded FDK at 20 SClloole .LB ln z004� LB In 7aa5 LB In zooe LB In 2007 Le In 2ooe LB Eu POOB. LB Eat 2oto�
� � � - � � � �eru�� P R � �O J E C -- T 1� -�� ��0� �-�N�-�
October 2010 2011 2012. 2013 2014 2015 _201&-
King County Live Births' 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,057 25,100 25,200 '
Inerease I Deerease --1% 1,686 65S 72� -165 43 � 100
Kindergarten/Birth°h ° 8.13% 8.13% 8.13% 8.13% 8.13% 8.13% 8.13%
"'Kindergarten FTE Q_5 749 0 0 0 0 0 0 '
"'FD Kindergarten @ 7.0 343 1,972 2,024 2,050 2,038 2,042 2,050
Grade 1 1992 1,912 2,075 2,129 2,156 2,144 2,148
Grade 2 1939 1,973 1,903 2,064 2,118 2,144 2,133
Grade 3 2000 1,977 2,020 1,949 2,113 2,168 2,195
Grade 4 1954 1,979 1,965 2,008 1,938 2,100 2,154 ,
Grade 5 2082 1,990 2,027 2,012 2,056 1,985 2,150
Grade 6 2130 2,126 2,054 2,092 2,076 2;122 2,049
Grade 7 2092 2,153 2,159 2,087 2,125 2,109 2;155
Grade 8 2151 2,12T 2,200 2,206 2,132 2,171 2,155
Grade 9 2434 2,414 2;399 2,481 2,487 2,404 2,448
Grade 10 2233 2,202 2,195 2,181 2,255 2,261 2,186
Grade 11 1949 1,967 1,950 '1,944 1,931 1,997 2,002
Grade 12 1573 1,567 1,591 1,578 1,573 1,563 1,616
Total FTE Enrollment 25,621 28,359 26,562 28,781 26,998 27,210 27,441
� nn.:x�oi. �
Yearly IncreasUDecrease ' -157 738 203 219 217 212 231
YeaAy Inaeasa�Deaaase°,4' -0.61% 2.88% 0.77% 0.82°h 0.81% 0.79% 0.85°k •
Cumulative Increase -�s� sai �sa �,003 i,z2o i,asz �,ees
Full Time E uivalent FTE 25 621 26 359 26 562 26 781 26 998 27 210 27,441 '
� Kintlergarten enrollment projecCOn is based on Kem SD percertlage of Ifve binhs in King County five years previous.
�Z Kintle�garte��!E projeclion is calalated by using Ne DistriGs previous year percentage M King Co�nry hirths flve yeare
eadier eomparotl to acWal kintlergarten enrollmenl in the previous year.(FxUudea ECE-EaAy ChilOnooA EtluceBon)
g Kintlergahen proJection ia et 7.0 tor FuII�.Day Kindergarten(FDK)at all 28 Elementary sehools. 2010 FDK furMetl el 5 schools by�
. stete aOPortlonment end seeontl tl2 of day iundad by Federal 8 Stete Cetapodcel Granta and Tultfan.
�4 OcL2010 PZ23 FTE ia 25,621 8 HeadcouM Is 28,630.Full Headeount with ECE ProaclioW 8 Running StaR eWdenta=27,349.
G R O W T H P R O J E C T I O N S - Ad'usVnents for curtent economicfactors
For facilities planning purposes,this six-year enrollment projection anticipates conservative enroilment
growth from new development currently in some phase of planning or construction in the district.
Kenl School DiaWd Six-Yeer Capltal FacilNies Plan Table 2 Aprll 2077 Page 7
KENT SCHOOL'DISTRICT No.d18
CAPACIiY of ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 3.KINDERGARTEN�PROJECTIONS (or October 2011
. �1.OP7E�- 1DF7E �� 7AFIE SFTE bFIE SF7E OcPH
� Faaast ' ForeceM� FmecaM Foxnl FpxaY Faecast P�qectod Fu0 0ay
miazoi� ror r« ror wr ror br icrae�artM Fxm
. -.� Pf092R1 1.0 FmMed 7.0 FuntleA 1.0 Funded 0.50 Fun0e0 0.50 FuMed 0.50 Furitled StuAenb SdY
e r
State TIUe I Dy - CombineC Optia�el ryp�puM I FiE
� EIEMENTARV SCHOOL ABR C8 8G nppnrtionment ARRAStlm F7ze laneergerten Tuiuorf9axe BavcEa Mrv
FDK FDK � FDK wu s in n,y tl2 Day(8 FDIQ 72 Uay K Only �1.0 �.50110 Code
Cartape Cresl Ekmentary tc 053 93 BO 30 cc
Ceder Valley Ekmenlery �v ISQ 80 80 30 w
Cari�9lon EbmeMny� co SOf 70 80 32 co
Cresfwad FJemenlery cw I88 91 82 41 av
Easl Hip ElemaMary e� p8 70 88 ' 93 0�
EmeraMPak= Fp 5W gq 9g 33 0�
FaimootlEbmentery rw 408 . 91 �88 33 vW
� George T.Daniel ElameMary� oe 136 88 � 88 88 : ce
Gbnridpe Ebmenfaiy ae 436 92 � - 88 � 33 r.x
Grass Lake ElemeMery c� /82 7B 30 �� � 15 �ct
Horim�Elsnmtla�YZ � 501 8� 78 3B. �
.lenkfin Creek Ebmenlary ac ' IW M1B SB . 2B ic
KeM ElMnenl9ry � � qE 78 78 18 RE
LakeYourpaEkmen�ery lr 6f0 17 12 21 v
We'tin SaWn Ebmemary kv 180 B2 92 �e us
MeaUow Rldge EkmaMary� wt QL n n 77 w+ .
Ner�an ElemeMery nff �Jp� 80 70 35 �
Mdle�nhmiElemaMmy� '.¢ BW 72 a 82 a1 ui
NeayO'BrienEbmentary . r» 4S2 e� �7Y4 82 w
Panlhm leke Elementery 0. 632 178 BO 45 c�-
Perk OrcMrd Elamanfary ao IBQ 71 � - . . . . . �� - .77 .. .71 vo
Pirro Tree Elm�eeMeiy 2 Fr 52B 88 a ' 82 31 vf
Ridpexood Elananlary qw 5W 91 70 35 rtw
SaxNer WooAa Ekmentery sn 501 91 St 2e sw
9cenk Nlp ENmen4ry sr q8 BB 88 � 88 sx
Soos C�eek EknMnmry sC 408 52 'S0 25 at
Spinpdaok Elemen�ry sB 151 58 89 12 as
$unriae EbmeMery SR 500 35 82 37 SR
. EkmenlaryTOTAL 1J,3BI 380 780 368 0 16l 88 1872 1776
�
nepsr�.� 7592
2B EkmeMary SCnob�� 8 11 1 0 6 i vm�av fa� 380
� - IlwemvM1 1972
NaAa 1:6 schoob htw Slab APPortlonme�R�lumlM FDK InepMIW on P-717 Enml6ns�rt Reporb ri tA F7E entl qapcW e!1.0 FTE.IDE�1��MR'PO'SH)
Nde 2 NAI=1MderyaRen Aredemic Inlavention el ML d PT in 09-f0 Deceme FOK Nnded bygieMS In 2D10-77.0 FDK wae funded by 4728 al CA-EP-HE-ME in 2010.11.
Nde 3:2l1 edqdy have FaOe�al6 State Calepwiml GnnFhmdad FOK pajecied ai 1.0 FTE-3 schods hauo onN/2 Dry Krtd.-S lmve OpUO�W TuitionbexA 8 12 DeY Kadugerlen e0 p'ojecfetl al
. Nooe 1:In M17-17 AU.t8 Ekme�Aary Sc�oob wlll havs FWI Day IUiMe�parten. . .
�i sa,od asma sa•r��c�pmi Fama�ria� Table 2 A nr� 2oi� v�e a
III Current Kent School District "Standard of Service"
In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County
Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school disfid must
establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service
identifies the program year, 4he class size, the number of classrooms, students
and,programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which
would best serve the student population.
This Plan includes the standard of service as established by KentSchool District:
The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as
"impac4" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at 4fiose
, facilities: Relocatables included in the capacity calculation use the same
standard of service as the permanent facilities. (See appendix A, e 8 c)
The standard of service defined herein may continue to change 'in the future.
Kent Schoof District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process
combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This
process will affect various aspects of the DistricYs standard of service and future
__ _ _
changes will be reflected in future capitaf facilities plans.
Current Standards of Service for Elementarv Students
Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 24 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 1 -4 is planned for an average of 25 or fewer students.
Class size for grades 5 -6 is pianned for an average ofi29 or'fewer students.
Program capacity for general education elementary classrooms is calculated at
an average of 24 students per classroom because of fluctuations beh4een
primary and intertnediate grade levels (i.e. thirdffourth or fourth/fifth grade spik
ciasses, etc.).
In 2010, most elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day
kindergarten programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second half of 1he
day funded by state apportionment; Federal & State Categorical Grants or
4uition. For 2011, five FDK Programs have state funding and the others will be
funded fhrough Basic Ed and Educational Programs and Operations Levy.
Students have scheduled time in a computer lab. Students may also be provided
music instruction and physical education in a separate ciassroom or facility.
Special Education for students with disabilities may be provided in a self-
contained classroom with a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
. . . . (corrtlnuedl
Kent School Diatrict Six-Yeer Capital Facilitias Plen April 2011 Page 9
I I I Current Kent School District"Standard of Service" «o�u��,ea�
Ident�ed students wiil also be provided other educational opportunities in
classrooms for programs such as those designated as follows:
- Engiish Language teamers (E L L)
Indusive Services/Tiered Intervention in SE Support Center Programs
Early Childhood Education (ECE) (3-4 yr. old students with disabilities)
Developmental Kindergarten in SC Programs
Integreted Programs &Resource Rooms (for sPecial remedial assistance)
Self-contained Special Education Support Center Programs (SC)
Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities (asc-oo) .
Speech & Language Therapy&Programs for Hearing Impaired students
Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/PT)
Education for Disadvantageii Studerrts (Title n — Federal Program
Leaming Assisted Programs (LAP) —State Frogram
District Remediation Programs
Education for Highly Capable Students (formerly"Gifted" Program)
Some of the above special programs require specialized classroom space, as
inrell as music and physical education classrooms, computer labs, etc.; thus, the
pertnanent capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced.
Some students, for example, leave their regularclassroom for a short period of
time to receive instruction in these:special programs�and "pull-ouY' space must
be allocated to serve these programs.
Some newer buildings have been constructed'to accommodate most of these
programs; some older buildings have been modified, and in some
circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the
buildings. When programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the
change in program and capacity.
Current Standards of Service for Secondarv Students
The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and
educational opportunities provided to secondary studeMs which directly affect
the capacdy of the school buitdings.
Class size for grades 7- 12 is planne5! for an average of30 or fewer students.
Special Education for students' with disabilities rriay be provided in a self-
contained classroom wfth a capacity of 10-15 depending on the program.
. . . . (contlnue�
� Kent School Distrlct Slx-YVar CapitaVFadlltles Plan Aprit 2011 Pege 10 �
I I I Current Kent School District"Standard of Service" �cona��oa�
Identfied secondary students will also be provided other educational
opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows:
Computer, MuICi-media 8 Technologg Labs 8 Progrems—(Nova Net-Adyancea Aeaaemics)
Technology Academy programs at Kent-Meridian High School&Mill Creek Middle School
Science Programs & Labs — Biotogy, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy,
Meteoroiogy, Mari�e 9iology, Generei Science, etc.
English Lenguage Leamers (E L L)
Integrated Prog2ms&Resource Rooms(for special remedial assistance)
Basic Skills Progrems
Transition Outreach Program(TOP)for18-21 year old Special Education swdents
Child Development Preschool and Daypre Programs '
Music Programs—Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jaa Band, etc.
Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography,etc.
Theater Arts—Drama,Stage Teeh,etc.
Joumalism and Yearbook Classes
Highry Capable(Honors or Gifted)and Advanced Placement Progrems
Intemational Baccalaureate("I B") Program
Kent Phoenix Academy—Pertormance Leaming Center,Gateway,Vrtual High School&
Kent Successprogram wi4h eveNngtlasses designed for credit retrieval
Tra�c Safety Education
JROTC-Junior Reserve Offieers Treining Corps
Variety of Career&Technipl Education Programs(CTE-Vocational EducaGon)
Family 8 Consumer Science—Culinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/ChildrenlEduc.,etc.
Heatth &Human Services—Sports Medicine, Sign Language,Cosmetology, etc.
Business Education—Word Processing,Accounting, Business Law 8 Matti, DECA,
' FBIA{Fuhire Businessieaders), Sales&Marketing, Economics,Web Design
Technical 8 Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, :Building Trades, Metals, .
Automotive &Manufacturing Technalogy, Welding, Machine Shop, Drafting, Drawing,
CAD(Computeraided Design),Electronics, Engineering&Design,Av_iation,ASL, etc.
Graphic,8 Commercial Arts, Media, Photography,Theater 8 Stage,A9&Horticultu2
Many of these programs and others require specialized classroom spacewhich
can reduce the permanent capacity of the school buiidings. In addi6on,
altemative home-school a§sistance, choice and transition pragrams are provided
for students in grades 3- 12 at Kent Mountain View Academy:
Space or Classroom Utilization
As a resutt of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized
r m for certain ro rams and the need for teachers to have a worlc s ace
0o s p g , p
during their planning ,periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of
regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the anatysis of actual
utiliiation of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization
_ . .. __ ._ _. ..
rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools
reflects 100% utilization at the elementary leveL
Kent School District SixNear Capttal FaUlitles Plen Apol 2011 Pege 11
I V InvenMry and Capacity of Existing Schools
Currently, the District has„permaneMprogram capacity to house 27,741 students
and transitional (relocatable) capacity to house 1,389. This capacity is based on
the DistricYs Standard of Senrice as,set forth in $ection I II. Inctuded in this Pian
is an inventory of the DisUicYs schools by rype, address and current qpacily.
(See Table 3 on Page 13)
The ratio between permanent capacity and transitional capacity is 97% - 3%.
The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs; additional
classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to
reflect program changes and new capacity for the new Panther Lake ElemeMary
School and building additions at the high schools.
Kent.Mountain View Academy (formerly Kent Leaming Center and Grandview
Elementary) serves Grades 3 — 12 with transition, choice and home school
assistance programs. It is looated in the fortner G(andview School in the westem
part. of the District in the city of SeaTac. This school was originally designed as
, an elementary school and is included in the elementary capacity for this Plan.
Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall
2007 in the renovated site and building that fortnerly served Sequoia Middle
Schaol. Kerrt Phoenix Academy has four special programs including the
Perforrnance Leaming Center, Gateway, Virtual High School and Kent Success.
Kent Suocess replaced the former Night Academy at.Kent-Meridian High School
and provides aftemoon and evening classes for credit retrieval.
Galculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are
set forth 'in Appendices A,: B and C. A map of ezis6ng schools is included on
- Page 14.
Kern School DistriU SIz-Year Capkal PadliUes Plen ApAI 2011 - Page 12
KENT SCNOOL DISTRICT Na 415
INVENTORY and CAPACITY of FXISTING SCHOOLS
zo�azo�r
rear
SCHOOL Ovened nert ADDRESS Program
Ce '
Cnrtlepe Crest EbmsMary 7980 CC 78235•140N Avenue SE, ReMOn 98058 482
'�Cetler Velley Elemantery 1971 CV .26500 Tlm6ailerro Wey SE, Covington BB042 488
CoNnplon Elemenmry 7987 CO 77070 SE Wex Ros4 Covinplcn 98042 �604
Craa4wotl�r1�ry 1980 CW ?5425-180th Avenue SE. Covinp0on'98042 458
�Emt HiA Elemamery 1953 EN 9825 S 240tl�Straet Kmt 98031 - �478
Emaraid Pa�k - 1999 EP 11800 SE 278th Stleet Kerrt-�98031 5p4
FBtn�voE Elemerhary 1969 FW 16600-148M Avenue SE, ReMCn 98058 �408
Oeorye T.Daniel ElemeMery 1992 DE 11310 SE 24Bih Streat KeM 98030 /68
GknriEqe Elemartrtery 1988 GR 19405•�1201h Avenue SE,Rmfnn 98058 456
Grasa L.eke Elemertlary 1971 GL 28700-791st Pleca SE, Kent 98042 452
Ndimn Elementary 1990 HE 27641-1C4th Avmue SE.�Kmt 98042 504
Jmkirm Cretl�Elmrentary 1987 JC 26975•7861h Avmue SE.'CoW�OOn 98042 4pq
KerR Elemenlary teee�7998 �KE 24700-64Ui Avanua South; Kmt�98032 478
Leke Youngs Etammtery 1963 LV 19660-142nE Avenue SE, KeM 98042 510.
Martln Sorlun Elemar�ry 18B7 MS '127'11 SE 248M Streat, KeM 88030 .48p.
Meetlow PoCpa Ebmentary 1994 �.MR 27710-708M Avenue SE,KeM 98030 478.
MmlNen ElemeMery 1939 ME 25621-140Th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524
Mllimnium Ebmenfary 2000 Ml 119�9 SE 270Ih Street, KeM 98030 � 6pq
Nealy-0'Brien�emmtery teeo r�eSS NO 6300 SouM 238th Street, Kent 98032 � 457�.
PanMer Lske Ela�ry �2W9/t�e� PL 20831-108Ci Avenue SE, Kent 98031 662
� Pmk OrtieN ElemeMery 1983 �PO 11010 SE 232ntl SC98L Kerrt 98031 � 488
Plrre Tree Qemen�7 1987 PT 27825-178th Avanua SE, Kerrt 98030 628
RidpewnodQementery 19B7 �RW 18030-762nqPleceSE, Renton�9B05B 504
. Sevyar.Woatls Elememery 799a SW 31135-2?Bth Ave SE,Bledc OlemonE 98010 504
Scenio Mill Ekrt�Mary 1980 SH 26025 WooCIaM Way SaM, Kent.98030 478
� ^uoos Gea1c E�ry 1977 SC -1T651 SE 218th Place. Kent�98031 408
, Springb�oak Qementary 1989 S8 Z0035-100th Avenue SE. Kerrt 98031 4g2.
� Sunriae ElemeM9ry 1992 SR 71300-132ntl Avenue SE, Kerrt 98042 5p4
� Elememary TOTAL �g,3g/
� Cetler Heiphb Mlddle Sehod 1993 CH �9640 SE 272 Sbeet,.Couirqtm 980a2 '9Zi
�� Mal�ai htiANe Sehool 7981 MA 16C00 SE 251at Street, Covinpmn 98062 793
� Meeker MMtlla Schad 1970 MK 726tl0 SE 192rW Street, Rmlon 98058 �890
. Mk�itlian MIENe Schod . 1958 MM 23480-120M Avenue SE. Kart.98031 7gp
� MIII C�aelc MS&recnnoropy nfaaany= 2W9 i ie52 MC 620 NoM Central Avenue, KeM 98032 828
. NoMwaatl Mitltlle Sdwol 7996 NW 77007 SE 184th Stieet, Rerrton 98058 972
� � MWtlle Schaol TOTAL 6,1gg
KeM.Meritlian HS 8 Ted1 ACeOemY 1851 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 , 1,861
� KerNeke Seria Mlph Sel�ool 1997 KL �27407 SE 3001h Sbael.Krnt 980a2 2,15j ,
Kentritlpe Seniw Hiph SGhOOI 1988 KR 72430 SE 20Bih SCOat, Kenl 98031 .2,27D
Kenlwood Senlor High Schooi 1981 KW 25800•76at�Avenue SE, Covirgfnn 98042 2,137
Senia Nigh TOTAL 8,416
� Kerrt Mounpin Vlew Acatlemy 3 1%7/7885 MV/LC 724�Militery RoeC. Op Moines 98198 �416 �
KerR P�oanix A�demy� 3u07 i 7988 PH 11000 SE Z841�Street, Kent 98030 3gp
DISTRICT TOTAL 27 741
,
�Chanpes to cepadb�eQ P�7�m chanpes antl new bulldinp additlona at hiph schools.
°Mill Creek Mitldle Schaal anO Techrrolapyluatlemy reDlaCed remvetetl KeM Junior High In 2005. �
'KeM MouMein Vlew Acedemy aerves predes 312.The xhooi was fortnerlY kmwn es KeM Leeminp CeMar 8 Grantiview Elemenpry,
' �Kent Phaenoc Academy is a nan-tratlitiorW hlph sctiool wltirti opened in Fell 2007 in tlie firmar Sequda MS build'mp.
Kent SUiml Dlstrict Slx•Year CspRel FaUliUes Plan Table 3 r�i za�� 7ape 13 .
� N
g A � � E���" Kent School District No. 415
p SEPefioWhk� �p�BWppd IAke .
�n' . Ele�„�ry ��re Serving�:residents�of
� o E°�r� � , Unincorporated King Counry
Mitltlle Selaol
� � •Meeke� No� � City of Kent
�� MlddleS hool City Of�Re�tO�
� Sl�drgbrook ^.Ele�m�bry. ��r°�� Cit Of AUbUm
� Elementary Elementa Y
� • „��, City of Sea Tac
� b e sezoemsr mka Clty Of'COVi11gt0�
� � S 2121h Si ' p pQ��ry��pk� Ememltl Pork Y�9+
e T Elem�farY E�e b�Y City of Maple Valley
_ ° , ES Bome�i�oery' .s��uB City of Black Diamond
� _'
� rk Orohard� ElemeMary
�KAMo�u�mrView 3 . ,�{�y1 E:reMary, .
.�w, Mi�leSChod . . �
.� 'Elemanary� ' Z. East H01 O � LY SE 240M St. �.
�' Elemenfa�� MIII Cree�k��ry Danlel Q � �n" . . ���0
� ry� IeSchod OElemenfary 9 � Mafhon
� Ma�Hn� � < Middle Sc
Rd K H�h Se�• E��n��Ory SE 266th St g � ElCe�me lary .
. a SceMC HID e � Atlm��shaNOn Blemen�Mry H19h Scho�ol Cedm Vnl pPB Lake
.� ElemenMry a • Lake ' Elem�fary
Kenf Ph x Jenkina
. . .. -� � �.g Academy� ���d�n� Creek� � � CedcrHel��1s
. • ElemenM O Middle Sc d�.SE 272nd St
� ' 0 Elile�ien�ta HoAton• � �9 -o����Ken�f-KangleyRoatl �
El�emen ury9B • �en1aN �'�� Elemenlary �-
Pine Tree Gmss Lake
ElemeMcry Q t� - ..Elemenfary
9 � SE CP�n9�W1.g�'Yer�p�, �
� ' f LOk9
^ . - ' Sowyar
y Wke Hjgh°kSciio�ol
;. 28 Elementary Schools y Morlon
; 6 Middle Schools � 5,,,,,i,��,�o
' 4 Senior High Schools Elementary
Kent Mountain Vlew Academy (Grades 3-12)
g Kent Phoenix Academy (9-12)
m
.
�
A
V Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan
At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2011, the following projects are
compieted or in the planning phase in Kent School District:
• Three new classrooms were added when the Auxiliary Gym project was recently
completed for Kent-Meridian High SchooL Construction is in progress for the Main Gym
� project ffiat will also provideadditional classroom capacity at Kent-Meridian in 2011-12.
• In February 2006,voters approved construction funding for replacement of Panther Lake
Elementary School:A new site was acquired nearby and the"NeW'Panther Lake
Elementary opened in Fall 2009 with a 28%increase in capacity. The districthas reeeived
authorizatlon from OSPl.for°Old" Panther Lake Elementary School to be held in reserve
for util'¢ation in the event of flooding in the Kent Valley.
• Planning ison hold for a replacement school for Covington Elementary School.The
project is pending sa6sfadory financial resouroes to fund the project.
• In Fe6ruary 2006, voters also approved_consVUCtion funding for a future ElemenNary '
School identiffed as Elementary#3T(actua/i�29)to accommodate new growth.
• Enrollmentprojections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary school
level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan.
• Some.tunding for purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as
needed. Sites are based on need for additional capaciry.
As a critical component of capitai facilities planning, county and city planners and
decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all
students when �eviewing applications and design plans for new roads and ,
developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety as well as bus
pull-owts and turn-arounds for school buses.
Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by
the District which are potentially acceptable site altematives in the future. (See
Tab/e 4 on.Page 16 6 Site map on Page 17)
Voter.approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for
some,of these and future schools, and the sftes acquired to date are included in
this Plan: Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites butsome may
be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet
current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or
sold to meet future facility needs.
2006 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement inciuded the
construction funding for new Elementary School #31 (actual #29), replacement
of Panther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some
impact fees have been or will be applied to those projects. The Board will
continue annual review of standard of service and those decisions wili be
reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan.
� KeM School Disinct Sbc-Year Capital Facilitles Plan Apol 2011 Pape 15
KENT SCHOOL DISTRiCT No.415
Slte Acqulsitlons and ProJeets Planned W Provide AddlGonal Capaclty
... . . . . . . � � ProleaeA Pmlectee %for �.
SCHOOL / FACILITY ! SITE LOCATION T Stetus Comp�et�on Proprem new
� � � - � � '�� . Date Ce aG Growlh
� �
#nn
.�D . . ELEMENTARY (NUmbers asslgned ro/umre schoGS mey not conelete wIM numeerof ezlstlng achoWS.)
' � . . .Replacemerrt
� S Repleeemant tor Covington Elementery (U) SE 258M Sireet 8154M Ave SE Elamentary Planninp 201415 800 16%
, Covinplon Elem- CapaGty to Da reD�� 17070 SE VVax Road, Covington ElemeMary Plannl�� 201415 304
New
EbmentaryC31 (Aatuelfl29) (F) Loealion'BD-TObadelertnirred ? Elementery PlanMng 2015•16 B00 100%
Slle kr Elementary#31 (UMundeC)� To Ce tletarminetl x Site Planninp 2014d5 100%�
MIDDLE SCHOOL
No Prolacta rcQuireO at Mis tlme
SENIOR HIGH
qaseroom i�
�KerM1-Merttllen HS-Claesroom Add�lona (� 10020 SE 2581h Slraet,Kent AEtlitlons Pmpmw 2011-12 53 1pD%
. Additbnel
�TEMPORARY FACILITIES Cepadly
Reloeatables For placeme'rt as nee0ed New Plennliq 2011+ s�•7i eam 100%
p on tuq ua LarM Uae
Map' � OTHER SITES ACQUIRED �oaav��uan T a JurisAldfon
�4 CoWnpton aree NoM- (Near Mffitaon MS) SE 251&�784 SE, Covi�tan 8804Y uroon Elemerrcary Clty of CovMgton
7 CqWnpton orea Soul� (Srarselta) SE 29D 6 138 SE, Kmt 98042 �. Rurw Elementary Kinp Counry
6 Covinpton aree West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 258 d 154 SE, Covington 98042 Urban �Eiementary City of Coving[on
3 Ham Lake eree (P011ard) 18820 SE 240, KeM 98042 fturat Elemmtary Kinp CouMy
8 SE of Lake Morton ama (Weat property) . SE 332 8 204 SE,��K8M 98042 Rurat Seco�ery lOrp County
2 S�atly lk area(Sowen,Blah�e,Orahota,Parolirre) 17426 SE 792 Street, Renton 98058 U�ban Ebmenlary qnp CouMy
1 So.Kinp Co.Aelivity CerRar(fortner Nlka elte) SE.787 8170 SE. Rentan 88058 Rum TBD' Kinp Caunty
12 South Cantral site (P�emmons-Veh-Wma)� SE 288N St 8 724th Ave SE,Aubum 88092 Urban TBD' pnp County
Notea:
' UnNnded fadlity neetls will be reWexetl In Me luluie.
�TBD-To Ce tletermlrred-Some sites ere�ecqulreG hut plecammt, tlmtnp sridlar ca�Afpurellon have not been deteimined. -
a NumbeB w�spontl lo sitas on Site Bank Mep on Page 17.Other Mep slleJOeeCOns are percels ICentifletl In Tahk7 on Pepe 27.
Kerrt Sehool Distdct Si�c•Year Cepltal Fadlities Pian Table 4 Apol�2071 Pege 18
� AN m �F���� Kent School District� No. 4�15
N ¢ : 9emeNap'� , .
g � ' Site;Bank
� . SE PetroW�sk'/Rd �
ERle�meni� � "
y a E��"� ° • � A i iti n
� M�a�h� ��ka Property cqu s o s
;� DeSre
m s�iwmasr � � ��ka�
�
b� E bn�ta� ��ry �LaE�rt1Vamp5 . .
lern
� � Fy�����qq Loke Voungs .
— � sE zoam r
�
� S 212fh Sf nMer La� Emeraltl Park
y Elemenimy Elemenfory
� 3 PanttrerL�ake �•
= RePlacemenf Ele�inerCij�«ye � O s,rnse
Q 'Elementory
Nant � � P�a�k�cf�d �
Mamtoln Vlew .�
ACatlemy � �o� 0 n
3
NeeNO'Brlen ''�a OMeritllon
F@ FJementory� � E�f FEII SE 2 � Mitldle ScFiod SE 240th St
3 � Elamentay
Kent � •NTOCre¢k O ',�'
p���ary� Mltltlle Schooi- e �
s� KenF El�emenTary ¢ I Mott
R � MeriQwn �N�^ � ��a -
m � Sc o�d EOr1umen�ry $ � �BSh�ood
g • sE zsam sf ^ ' .
c m w Atlm•harion •El�an��tary �en,�!��� CetlarVaney a�Lake
Q SceNC HillO m Cenier �x'�+�' FJementory
>
z Elementary ac Kenf%aernc Lake Merltllan Jenldns �
m s ACOtlOIIiY MLemium Cfeek• CBtlarHeloh
U o sge�r��i Elementory 0 Mitltlle ScFOd '�272 ntl St
Meotlow Ritlge Kant-Kangley Roatl
�Elementory m Horizon6 ,0 �COWiaton
OP�E�n�mT��9 Elemenhary �� Elameritory
��S �°� G�Elepmeniory
s�zae mee� � o
�cvn�o„so�»,a
�Rp
�4 KentlakeO SowYer
6 SE 30EtIt Sffeet �High SCItOd
9 ^
3 �y�
\ 1 B!NbOd9
�. . �` 1L.9ke.. ��EleMenfory � . .
UMOrron
m �
0
m : .
� sE 33am sr
V I Relocatable Classrooms
For the purpose of cla�cation, the tertn "portables" and the more descriptively
accurate term, "relocatables" are used interchangeably in this Plan. The Plan
also references use of portables or relocatables as interim or transitional
capacityand facitities.
Currently, the District utilizes relocatables to house students in excess of
permanent capacity, for program purposes at some school locations, and some
for other purposes. (see apPend�ces d e c o�
Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten
programs, program capacity and the need for add'itional permanent capacity, the
District anticipates the neeil to purchase some addftionat relocatables during the
next six-year period.
During the time pe�iod covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that
all of tfie Di§tribYs relocatables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During
thevseful life of some of 4he relocatabies, the school-age population may decline
in some communities and inorease in others, and these relocatables provide the
flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs ofthe community.
Portables, or relocatables, may be used as interim or Vanskional facilRies:
1. To.prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school
facii'dies.
2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased
capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet
that demand.
3. To meet uniqueprogram requirements..
Relocatables currently in the DistricYs inventory are continualiy evaluated
resulting in some being improved and some. replaced. Quality concems will be
among those addressed by review of capital facilities needs for the next bond
issue.
The Rlan projects that the.District will use relocatables to accommodate interim
housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of relocatables, their
impacts on permanent facilfies, life cycle and operational costs, ,and the
interrelationship between relocata6les, emerging technologies and educational
restructuring will continue to 6e examined.
Kent Sehool DisWa Sbc-Year Capttal Facill6es Plan ApAI 2071 Page 18
Y I I Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity
As stated in Section I V, the program capacity study is periodically updated for
changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations, grade level
splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 13,
the p�ogram capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison
C�'18PtS. (Sea Tabld4 S 6 5 A-B-C oe peges 20-23)
Enrollment is electronicaily reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis
and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average.FTE (AAFTE). The first
school day of October is widely recognized as the enroliment "snapshot in time''
to report enrollment for the yeac
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) student enrollment for October2010 was 25,621.48.
Kindergarten students are reported at .5 although many schools proVide_full day
kindergarten ("FDK") with altemative fund'ing for the second half of the day.
State Apportionment-funded Full Day Kindergarten programs will report and
project some Kinderg"arten students at 1.00 FTE at qualifying FDK schools. The
P-223 FTE Report excludes Early Childhood Education ("ECE" preschooQ
students and College-only Running Start students. �soo reaessasa-a-co��szo-zs�
In October there were 681 students in 11"' and 12�' grade participating in the
, Running Start program at 10-20 different colleges and receiving credits toward
both high school and college graduation. 329 of these students attended "classes
only at the college ("college-only°) and are excluded from FTE and headcourrt for
capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has the highest
Running Start program enrollment in the state.
Kent School District continues to be the fourth largest district in the state of
Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2010 was 26,630 with kindergarte�
students counted at 1:0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start
students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2010 totals 27,349
which includes ECE and college-only Running Start students.
Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity,
current standard of service, relocatable capacity, and future planned additional
classroom space, the District anticipates having sufficient 'capacity to house
students over the next six years. �soe racre s e�a reeres s n-e-c oo ve9es zo-zs�
This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There .
may be a need for additional relocatebles andlor new schools to accommodate
growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate
placement of future relocatables. Boundary changes,. limited and costly
movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational
I restructuring will all play a major rofe in addressing overcrowding and
underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District.
Kent School Disfitt Six-Year COpltal Fealltias Plen April 2011 Paga 19
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
TOTAL DISTRICT
SCHOOL YEAR xo�a2o�� 2o��-zo�2 zo�z•zo�a io�3zo�a 2011-2015 zo�szoie 2ois-zon
ncwai P R. O J E C T E D _
Permanent Pro iam Ca d ' 27,741 27,741 27,794 27,794 27,794 27,890 28,490
Chan es to Permanent Ca a ' '
Kent-Meridlan HS-2011-12 Additions(�' S3
2 Cleasrooma�added at KM
Repla�emern schaol with proJectad inaease In capaUry:
CovingtonElementaryy (umundea) B00
To Replece artent Covinpton Elementery eapadty� -504
New ElemeMery#31 �ecawrze> (FUnaed� 600
Permerrent P rem Ca ad SWHOteI 27,741 27,794 27,794 27,794 27,890 28,490 28,490
Interim Relocatable C aci
ElemeMary Rebcelebk CepecXy Requlrotl 0 188 312 528 624 240 408
M1tltlN Schod Relzmebb Cepadty ReqWieC 4�� � �O 0 0 0 0 0 0
sa�ro�wpn aabmuwe ceomry aeqw�ea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tofel Reloeetahle CepaUty Raqulred��8 0 168 312 528 � 624 240 408
TOTAL CAPACITY ' 27,741 27,962 28,108 28,322 28,514 28,730 28,898
TOTAL FTE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION s _ - . 25 621 28,359 26,562 26,781 � 26,998 27 21 O 27,441 �
DIS7wciAVaweLECnrACm� 2,120 1,603 1,544 1,541 1,576 1,520 1,457 ,
' Capadty is based an standard of service for pmgrams-provided arrcl is updstetl periodically to reflect Dro9ram changea. .
��Classroam add'Rions ere under construGion et Kent-Meridien HS and expected to be availabie kr 2011-12 achool yeac ��
� Replacement school tor Covington Elamentary wlll increase capacity end will be buitt on e diffarent existing site.
" In Fell 2004,9th grade moved to the high schools which Increesed capacity avaflabie at Middle School 7th-8th grade levels.
5 F1'E�Full Time EquNaleM EnrollmenUProjeeti0ns.(1.e:�12 day Kintlergarton sWae'it=.5.8 Fult Day Kintlergarten sWaerrt=1.0 FTE).
° 2010.2011 total Gassroom retocatable eapaGry��is 1,389. . .
� School ppacily meets concurrency requirements�antl no impact fees ere proposed for middle schoals.
�u smom o�ma s�-vo��can���Feaim88 v�a� Table 5 nPdi 20�i Pape m
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROIIMENT and CAPACITY
SENIOR FlIGH - Grades 9 - 12
SCHOOI YEAR zo�a2o�i 2o�i-zou zo�z-zo�3 zoia-zo�a 2o�azois zo�s2oie 2oi�-2on
nauai P R O J E C T E D
Senior Hi h Pertnanent Ca aci � 8,765 8,765 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818
� InUudp Kent Phoenlx Aeatlemy 2
Chan es to Hi h School Ca ci
Kent-Meridian HS-2011-12 Additions(F)
�2 Classrooms added (�essc um�anon� 53 �
Subtota� 8,765 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818 8,818
Relocatable Capa R ired ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL CAPACITY � 6 765 8 818 8 816 8,618 8,818 8 81 B 8,818
FTEENROLLMENT/PROJECTION � 8,189 8150 8,135 8,1&4 8;246 �8�225 8;252.
SURPWS DEFICI CAPACITY 576 668 683 634 572 593 566 _
Number ot Relxafablea Requlratl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
No Classroom Retocetables required at this tlme.Sama ReloceWbles used for classroom and�progrem purposes.
� Capedty is based an standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodicelly to reflect progrem changes:
= Kent Phoenix Academy opened In Fall 2007 serving gredes 9-12 with four special progrems.
3 FTE=Approximete Full Time Equivelenl Enrollment or projections,excluding College-only Running Start students:
Kent Sehool DisfiC S6o-Yeer Cepltei FaGlities Plan Table 5 A nc�+i zo+� Page 21 '
KENT SCHOOL DISTRIGT No. 415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades-7 - 8
SCHOOL YEAR 2o�a2o>> 2oi�-zoiz 2012-2013 201J-2014 20142015 2o�s2o�s zo�szon
aauai P R O J E C T E D
MlddleSchoolPermanerrtCapacity' S,796 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196
Changes to Middle School Capacity
4 Mill Crcek MS�8 Teehnology Acedemy
. �am open during Phase 2 ot Renovetion
(NO�rew npaaty added in rcnovation)
Submtal 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196
Reiocatable C aci Re uired' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL' CAPACITY �a� 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196
_ETE ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION Z A;243 . 4,280 4,359 4 293 4,257 4,280 4 31�
SURPLUS DEFICI CAPACITY' 953 916 837 803 939 91fi 886
�NumDer pf RelocaUbbs Requirod 0 � 0 0- 0 0 0 D
�No Classroom Reloeatablee roquirad at middle schools at this time.Some RelocaWblas used tor classroom and progrem purposea.
� ' Capadty is based on stendard of service for�programs providad and is�updated periodically to reflect program changes.
Z FTE=Approximate Full Time Equivalent Enrollment or Projections
3 Surplus capaciry due to grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade studeMS moved to the high achools in Fall 200a.
" Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no:impact fees are colleded for middle schools.
Kent Sehool DlstriG Sic-Year Capttsl Facilities Plan Table 5 B ^P�� zo» aa9e zz �
KENT SCHOOL D13TRICT No.415
PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY
ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6
SCHOOL YEAR 2o�azoia zo�i-zaiz zo�z-zai3 zais-zou zou-zau zo�s-zaie 2o�c-2an
naue� P R O J E C T E D
Elementa Permanent Ca aci ' 13,364 13,780 13,780 13,780 13,780 13,876 14,476
KeM MeuMain View Academy Z 416
Chan es to Elemenfa C aci
�.Re0leaement school with Prol�Increase In eapeGry:
Covington Elemer�ry� (umm�ded) 600
wni replace wrrem Covinywn Elementar/wpadry 'SO4
New Elementary#31 (FUnaed�5 600
' sutmta� 13,760 13,760 13,780 13,780 13,876 74,476 14,476
Reloeatable Ca ac' Re uired' 0 168 312 528 624 240 408
7'OTAL CAPACITY Z 13;780 13,948 14,092 14,308 14,500 74,716 14,884
FTEENROLLMENTIPROJECTION � 13 189 13 929 14 068 14,304 14,495 14 705' 14,879
SURPLUS DEFICI CAPACITY 591 19 24 4 5 11 5
NumEerofReloceteDleaRequlreA 0 7 73 22 26 10 77
� 26 Classtoom Relocatables required in 2014-15. Some addiUonal Relocetables usetl for.propram purposas. �
� Cepadry is based on stendard of sarvice for programs provided�end is updated periodically.to reflect program changes.
. � Kent MouMain Vew Acedemy is a spetial program at Ne fortner Grendview School serving studerds�in Grades 3-12. .
The sehool buildfng(fortnedy Kent Leaming CeMer 8 Grandview Elem J was designed es en elemeMary sehool.
� FTE=Approximete Full Time Equivelent Enrollment or Pmjectlons(Kindergarten�1.0&exWutling ECE)
ALL ElemeMaey Sehooh wlll hava FULL Day KlnAargartan�amNng In 2011-15.
In Fall 2011;Klnderparten proj�UOn ehangn to tA FTE for Full Oay KlnderpaKan proprams at ALL 26 ElemeMary Sehools.
� ReplatemeM sehool for Covington Elemerrtary wil6 increase ppacity and is planned for a diHera�rt existing site.
°� Site seleetion and�eonsWCtion tlming for Elementary�#31 is pending review of Iocation�and wpacity.needa.
Kem scnooi oiau+a six-vea.caWmi Faaraes pw� Table 5 C nnni zon P�e zs
V I I I Finance Plan
The finance plan shown on Tab/e 6 demonstrates how the Kerrt School District plans to
finance improvements for the years.2011 - 2012 througfi 2016 - 2017. The financing
components include secured and unsecured funding and impad fees. The plan is based
on voter approval of future bond issues, collection of impad fees under the State
Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigafion fees paid pursuant to State
Environmental Policy Act
In February 2002, voters approved a $69.5 million bond issue for capital construction
and improvemerds.. The bond issue partially funded building additions at 4hree high
schools which coincided with mov'ing 9'" grade students from junior high to senior high
schools in September 2004. The Distrid receiVed some State Funding Assistance
(formeriy known as "state matching funds") and has utilized impact fees for the senior
high additions.
In February 2006, voters approved a $106 million bond issue that included funds for
repiacement of Panther Lake Elemerrtary School with inc2ased capacity, as well as
wnstruction of new Elementary School #31 (actual #29) to accommodate growth. The
new Panther Lake Elementary School replaced the pre4ious Panther Lake Elementary
in Fall of2009.
The bond issue also funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and
renovation of Sequoia Middle School for reconfiguretion"as a non-traditional high school,
KeM Phoenix Academy, which opened in September 2007.
2006 construdion funding approval also provided for edditional classrooms at Kentlake
High School.and two projects at Kerrt-Meridian High School. The projects at Kent-
Meridian High School provide additional capacity wifh sev_erel new dassrooms and
gymnasium space. The first projecf at K-M was wmpleted and the second is currently
under construction. Some impact fees have been or will be utilized only for the new
construction that will increase capacity.
The district has designated $16 million of the 2006 bond authorization for construction of
an additional elemeMary school ("Elementary#31°), currerrtly scheduled for completion
in fhe fall of 2015, dependerrt on enroilment leveis. Although the school is identified as
"Elementary School#31' R wilf actually be the 29"'elementary sehool in the district.
The Finance Plan includes a few new relocatables to provide add'Rional capacrty and
some may be fvnded from impact fees.
Enrollment projections reflect future need foraddftional capacity at the elementary level
and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual
updates of the Capital Facilities Plan.
For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from
Kent School District Facilities DepartmeM. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of
the cost basis.
Kent Sehool Disirkt Six-Year CaplWl FaUliGes P�en April 2D17 Page 24
KENT 3CHOOL';DISTRICT No.416
SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN
. . . .� � . . _ . - .. . SewreA Unsewred� Impact
SCHOOLFACIUTIES ���� 2071 2072 2013 � �2014. 2015 2018 TOTAL . Local6Sla�e� Staie°mLxd9 �Fees 5
. . - - , -, . . � � - � - ' . EWmeled.. ' Estlmned. .
PERMANENT.FACIIITIES ,
KenFMeridianHighSchool F . 57.500,000 51,SOO.OW 5400.000 �51.700,000
Classroom Additbns��Z .
No Middle School Pro�eds al this time ,
Covirgton Elementary Replacement� U 531.840,000 f31.840.000 526.745,600 35,094,400
ElemeMary637 7-z-J F 533,400,000 533,400,OW 578,000,000 56.940,000 $t0A60,W0
ElemeMarySife � U �35.000,000 35,000,000 S5,OD0•000
TEMPORARY FACILITIES
F
AdtliUOnalRebcetables3-4 U 5255,000 5260,OW $277,000 � � 3798,OOD 5798,OW
2 rebcetable8 2 rebulabNa 2 rebrafebb9
OTHER
N/A
ToWls Szss,000 E7,78e.0o0 Szn.oOO S96.aao.000 539.400.000 SU t7z.596.00o S�s.+oo.000 533�6&5.600 n2�a50.400
• F = Funded U = UMunded - .. -
NOTES:
� Based on estimales o(actual ar fuliae cons6uclion cosls 6an Fadilies Departrnent:(See Page 25 tor Cost Bas4 SwnmaM
� The Ofs[rk[arNdpales re(xiving some Stete.Fundmg Canslrudion AsstsWnce(immerly krwwn as"matdJng NrMS�for ihese Prolecls.
' Fadtity needs are peMinp reNew.'Some of Mese proJects may be NiMed wifh impaet teea. .
� Coat cf RelocetaWe.s.besed on arreM coat and aOJusted tor InflaUon ta(uture yeeta. � '
° Feea in Mis column are baseG on amouM ot faes cdlecled to Eete entl estimakd feea on ltiture tirMS. . .
Kent school Dietdct sbe-Year Captte�Fadliues t�an Ti1ble 6 �m zo�i Page 25
V I I I Finance Plan -Cost Basis Summary
For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last
elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next
elementary schooL
Elementary School ._ Cos! Projected Cost
Millennium Elementary#30 - -
Opened in 2000 $12,182,768
Cost of Pantlier Lake Elementary
Replacement (Opened in Fail_2008) $26;700,000 '
Projected cost- Covington Elemerdary
Replacement (Projected to open'in 2014) $31,840,000
Projected cost of Elementary#31.in 2015 $33,400,000
Average cost of Covington Elementary
Replacement 8 Elementary#31 $32,620,000
Construction cost of high school addition:
SeniorNigh School Addkions Projected Cost Total
Kent-MeridianHS-201.1-12Addition#2 $1,500,000
Classroom Additions only
Constructiomcost of new HS capacity $1,500,000
Site Acquisirion Cost
The site acquisition cost is based on an average:cost of sites purchased or built
on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a IisY of site
acquisition costs and averages.
District Adjustment
The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District AdjustmenY'
to reduce the fees calculated by the impact fee fortnulas. Based on current
economic condftions, the District has adjusted the impact fees to keep the same
rates as those currently in place and made no adjustment for increase in the
Consumer Price Index.
Kent School DisMG Six-Year Capital FacAities Plan April 2017 Pape 28 ,
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415
Site AcquisiUons 8 Coats
Averege of Sites Pufahesed or Built on within last 76:Yea�s
Type� - - - . _ - ree.Open� -- .
. 0 an Mep SCII001 /:�SItB W�chaaed Locetlon M+eape Cost A casHaae .Tof�A � Coet/Aaa
Elemeirtery ' .. .
73lUrban PantlrerLakeElementeryReplacementSite 2aoe 102ooSE2�8St,Kem88o3t 8.40 $4,485,013 $477,129
5/UrDan ElemenlarySite(HallesonBWkstrom) 2004 16435SE2583t,Covingbn98044 10.00 $1;093,910 $109,391
oemer�ysitasuboore� 19.40 $5,578,923 $287;573
� Elem eNe ave� .
Mitldle Sc1qo1 � .
, uroen Northwood Middle School �eee 77007 SE 784 31,Ren[on BBOSB 24.42 $855,138 $26,828
io�urean Mill Creek MS(Kent JH)/AAdAillan S[assmidege zooz 411-452 McMilian St,Ken�88032 1.23 $844,868 $888,883
12l U�ban So Central Site-Unin�ap KC(Pkmnans,Veh,Wma) 1999 E of 1 Y4 SE blw 286-288 PI(UKC) 39.36 E1,938,020 $49,188
Miedie sa�od sim subromi 85.01 53,438,024 852,854
YNEMScM&bA .
Senior Hgh � '
�t i uroen K-M High School Addition�Kerna a arin smm� Nq2 8 2003 10002 SE 256th Street 6.31 $3,310,000 $524,584
seniorHign KeMlakeHighSchool �KOmoaMwris� tss� 214015E300SY,KeM98092 40.00 E537,534 E13,438
s�uroen Keniwood Sr Hi Addition �senmw� tsse 76807 SE 256M Sheet 3.83 $302,117 578,882
Senior Higfi Site suMo�el 50.14 $4,149.651 $62:781
� . SrH181teAvera e
Note:NI nuel si6es were V�esed P�a M adoPtion ol U�Ean GroxM Area: � .
Numbers cortespaM to Io�UOns m Sife Bankk 8 Aoquisitians Map on Pape 77. . .
. �P��P�1u1998
7/Rurel So.qrg Caunb Aetivib Center(Nike sitel Wrchaxtl pror ro 1996. . -
4/Urben �Site-Covi�gton erea North (So of Matlaon MS) 7984. TWaI Aaeapa 8 Cosl � Total Awrege Cori I Aere
3/Rural s�te-�n taice eeat�(POUem) . . tBSZ 134.55 513;784,598. - .. $97,842
7/Rurel �Site-SoiM of Covinptm(S�sella) � 1993 � . � . . �
B/Rurel � SiOe-SEU1LSkeWoAOnarea .(West)� 1993 . .. ,
� 2/Uiben� Slte-ShedY.leke(SOV�ers-&aine-�Perd'me) 1995 � . � .
. 9/UA�en Old Kent Elemenlery reqaced mM cunermy leased aA. � � .
�n sa�oi�s�•ree�c�Fm���� Table 7 a�7 io�+ a�e z�
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
FACTORS POR ESTIMATED IMFACT FEE CALCULATIONS
Student Generatlon Factors-Single Famfly Student Generation FacWrs-Multi-Famtly ,
x ElemeMary (Grades K-6) D.486 Elementary 0.337
x Middle School (Grades 7-8) 0.130 Middle School 0.067
x Senior High (Grades 9-12) D250 Senior High 0.124
x Tatal 0.886 Total 0.522
Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI-Square Footape per 3tudent
x Elementary 600 Elemerdary 90
x Middle School 900 Middle'School 117
x Senior High Addltlon 53 Senior,High 130
- Special Education 144
Rpuired Site Acreage per Faeiiily
x Elemenfary (required) 11 Average Ske Cost/Aere
x Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $287,573
x Senior High(required) 32 Middle School $0_
Senior High $0
New Paeitity Construetion Cost
x Elementary` $32,620,000 Temporary Faetlity Capaeity & Cost
x Middle Sehool $0 Elementary (c� 24 $127,500
x Senior High ' 51,500,000 Middle School � 29 $0
•see eost besis m Pp.2e . Senior High � 31 $0
Tamporary Faeility 3quare Footage State Funding Assistance CredR�.yswwmn
x Eiemerrtary 70,892 DlsMct FunCing Assiatance Percerrtaqe 56.65%
x Middie sonoo� �s,s�s
x SeniorHigti 22,064 �
x Total 3% 109,332 ConstrueUon Cost Allowance ccn-cosdsy.Fe
nree cos(N�waance(Enective Juy o9) $180.17
PerrnaneM Faeility Square Footage
x ElemeMary (InGudesKMVA) 1,470,543
x Middle School 667.629 Distrlct Average Assessed Value
xSeniorHigh 1,111,036 SinplePem�yResiaence $288,279
x Total 97% 3;249,408
Total FaeilHlea Square Footage Dlslrict Average Assessed Value
x ElemeMary . _1,541,435 Multi-Fami.ty Residenee $99,888
x MiddleScho01 667;629 Aperdnents77%Condos2s%
x SeniorHigh � 1,133,100
x Total 3;342,364 Capital Levy Tax Ratel$1,000
Curtent /51.000 Tax Rete(1.7236) $1.84
Develope�Provlded Sites/Faeilkies.
Value 0 General Obliga8on Bond Interest Rate
Dwelling Units _ 0 currern aona trrcerest cta�e 4.91%
� KeM School DlaMct Sb-Yeet CepEel Fadlitim Plan Hp�i12071 Pape 28 .
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
�Slte AcquislGon Cost per Single Famity Residence
Fortnula: ((Aeres z Cost per Acre)/Fedll Ce e )z Studant Genaration Faetor
' Requlrctl Site Ave'aye Slle CusVAae Fedlity Cepmiry SWUeirt Feqor .
A 1 (Ekmerrtery) 11 E287,573 600 � � 0.486 — �52,562.28
A 2 (MlAtlle Sdioop 27 SO 1,065 0.130 � SO
A�3 (SenbrHigh) 32 $0 1,000 o.uo 30
0.866
A b� - .$2,562.28
Permane�R Faeility ConsWctlon Coat per Single Famlly Residence
Fortnula: ((FeGliry Coat I FaGI Ca x StudeM Fecto ■ PertnanenVTOteI S uare.FOOta e Retio
ConatruWOnCaI FaUlily SWtleMFeeror FootaeWtb .
B 1 (Elementary) 532,620,000 600 0.486 0.97 .825,629.53
� B 2 (Middla Sehooq SO �900 0.130 0.97 EO �
B 3 (Senior High) 51.500,000 53 .�Z¢Q 0.97 56,863.21
0.866 B "b . :E32,a9274
� Temporary{aelliry Caat per Single Femily Reeldenee �, �
Fartnula: ((Facllky Cost I.Faell Ca�eG )x StuCent Fsaor)x(Tem ora I Total Square Footage Ratlo .
FeGAIy Cwt Fedllry CepeGqr � SWtlent FaUOr�- �Footepe Retlo
C�:t (Elementary) 5727,500 24 0.486 �� 0.03� � 577:48
C 2 (Mitltlle Sehooq EO 29 0.130 � 0.03 EO
C 3 (Senior High) �EO 31 Q,�Q 0.03� � . SO
O.esa C o , fn.as
seaoe wnain9 nss�smeee credn per sine�e Femiy Resmenes �rom,ery•searo nnaccn^�
� Fovnula: Area Cost Nlowance z SPI S uare Feat per sNdeiri x Fundln Aseiaqnce°h x SWdent Faetor_ .
Area Cost Albwanm SPI S .FL f Stutlerit EpualVatlai%� SWtlenl Fador. . ,
D1 (Elementary) ��5780.77 90 0.5fi65� - 0.486 � 54;464.38-
D2 (MItlCleSchoop �E180.17 117 0 0.730 � �� SO
�� ' �D3 (SeniarHigh) E780.17 730 U.5665 0.250 �53,317J5
. � {' � � E7.781:54
. Taz Credl[per Single Famity Reeidence - -- �� -
. '�Averege SP Residential Assessed Value 5268.279 � �
CurteM Capital Levy Rate/31,000 57.84
� Currerrt Bond Interest Rate , 4.91% , . .
VearsAmotHzed (10Yaers) 10 . TC .� ��53,838.62 .
Developer Provided Faelliry Credk � Fecil /Site Value Dwelling Unks . �
0 0 FC b . 0
Fee Recap
A = Slte Aequisttion per SF Residenm 52,582.28 � . �
B = Pertnanent FeW Iry Cost per Residence Effi,49274 . . . '
C = Temporary FeGliry Cost penRealdence E77.46 � , ,
Subtotal E35J32.47 � .
D = State Match CrodN per Residence E7.78t.54 „
TC=Tax Credit per Realden¢e. 53.838.62 �
� . � Subtotat 511,620.15 .
Total Untuntled Need E23;512.32� �
. 50%Developer Fee Obligation E11.758
, � FC=FacilRy Crodit(If epplicable) 0 - ,
. � District AdJustment (See aaoe 2e�o�ezo��auon) S� .
Net Fee ObligaUon per Residence-Single Famlly $5 486
. Kent School DisMct Six-Year Cepital Fadlkies Plan qp���.pp�� p�e pg� . �
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMICY RESIDENCE
� Ske Aequlsltlon Coet per MWtl-Famlly Rmldenee Unh
Fotmula: ((Adea x Cost r Aere)/FeWI �.Ce - x StutleM GEneratlon Faator
� - R Wrctl Stte Auetpe Averape Site CoaVAUe. � .Faul �SWEent Fm:tor �
A 1 (Elameniary) 17 - $287,573 - 500 0.331 52,094.11
A 2 (Mlddb Sehooq 21 $0 . 1,065 0.067 'SO -
A 3 (Senior HghJ 32 $0 7,000 Q�4 EO
0.522
A � az.osa.i�
Perma�ant FaGliry ConaWotlon Cost per Muld-Famity.Reaidenea Unit
Fortnula: �((Faciltty Coat I Facil CapaG )x StudePrt Faetor)x Pertnanent/7otel Square Footage Ratfo)
ConnUUdlonCcet. . �FecIllryCepaUry. -- �SWOeritFactor .Fao�agoRatlo�
B 1 (ElemenWry) 532,620,000 - 600 0.331 0.97 817,455.51
B 2 (MitlGle School) EO 900 0.067 0.97 SO
B 3 (Senior High) - 51,500.000 53 � �0.724, O.W E3,404.15
, 0.572 8 b 520,859.66
Temponry Faeility Cos!per MNWFamlly Realtlence Unit
Formula: ((Facility Coat/Faeill Caped )x Student Fador)x(Tem ore /Totel S uaro Foota Ratio �
FadlilyCost. FaG16yCapeUry :SWiIaMFnCw .FOOtaqsRetlo �
C 1 (EkmeMery) Y127,500 24 0.331 0.03 552.75
C 2 (MidNa Schooq SO 29 -0.067 0.03 SO
. C 3 (SeniorHiph) 50 . . . 31 0.124. 0.03 SO
� - . . . � 0.52Y C b $52.78
Sfate Fumlfng Asslatence CredR per Multl-Famlly ResfAenee (formerly"SfaU.Melch'� ,
. _ . . . . ._ .. __ _..
Fortnula: Area Cost Allowanee x SP�S uare Feet per sWdent x FunEinp Assispnee% x SWdeM Pettor .
. . . AreaCOStAIIOwaMe �' SPISG.R/SWOent EWeli�lion% SWdeMFaqor
' D 1. (Elamentary) -5180:17 • 90 . 0.5665 - U.337. E3,040.56
D2 (MWd1e�School} 5780.17 - N7 0 �.087 � .SO
D3 (SenbcHlgh) 5180.17� 130 0:5885 0.124 57,845.37
' , D 4 54.BB5.88
Taz CreAl[per Multl-Famlly Resideue Unit
_ • - Averepe ME Resldantial Assessed Value E99,888
� Curtant Capital Lavy Rete/51,000 E7.84
- Current Bond IMarest Rete 4.91°�
Yeara Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC b �57,429.23
Developer Provlded Faclllry Cratllt � Fadliry I Slte Value Dwellie Untts
0 0 FC a p
Fee Recap
A = Ske Acquisttlon per Multi-Family Unk E2,094.7 7
B = Partnanant Faelliry Cost per MF Unit $20,859.66
C = Temporsry Faditty.Cost per MF,Unit 35275 �
. SuMOtel 523,006.52
D = State Match CradR par MF UnR E4,685.86
TC=Tex Credit per MF UnR Si.429.23 �
� Subtotal 56,715.09
Tatal Unfunded Neetl 576,891.42
� 50%Dereloper Fee Obligatlon . 58,448 �
FC=Faciltty Cred'd(if epplieahle) 0 -
', , DistriG Adjustmant�.(See Ppe 2e kr azplana�on) (58,088)
- Net Fee Obligedon par ReaWentlal Unk-MuW-}amlly $3,37$ .
Kent School District Si�-Year Ceprial Fadlitles Plan /1pd12017 Pape 30
IX Summary of Changes to April 2010 Capital Facilities Plan
The Capital Facilkies Plan (the "Plan"),is updated annually based on previous Plans in
effect,since 1993. The primary changes from the Apri12010 Pian are summarized here..
New Panther Lake Elementary School replaced "Old" Panther Lake Elementary and
opened in Fall 2009. "Old" Panther Lake Elementary is being held in reserve for
utilization in the event of flood emergency in the Kent Valley.
Future projeds include potential replacement and expansion of Covingtom Elementary
School, future new Elementary School #31 (actual#29), and one qroject that increases
capacityat Kent-Meridian High School to accommodate new growth.
Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program
changes. Changes in relocatables or trdnsRional capacity reflect use, purcFiase, §ale,
surplus and/or movemeM between facilities.
The student enrollment forecast is updated annually. Six-year Kindergarten proje�tions
were modfied.to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all
Elemerrtary schools in 2011-12.
The district expects to receive some State.Funding Assistance (formeAy called "state
� ma4ching funds") for.projeds in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually.
Biennial update of stude,rrt generation rates was compieted last year. Unfunded site and
faality needs will be reviewed in the tutuFe. .
Based on current economic condRions, the District Adjustment results in no change to
, the current impact fees.
Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include:
ITEM ���v� FROM TO Comments
Student Generetion Factor Elem o.aas o.aea Biennlel Update in 2010
Single Family(SF) r�ns a�is o.�so
SH 0.245 0.250 - �
Totel 0.808 0.866 +.58
Student Generation Factor Elem 0.296 0.331 Blennial Uptlate in 2010
Multi-Family(MF) Ms o.me o.os�
-. �SH 0.111 0.124 � �
Total 0.482 0.522 +.4D
State Fund'mg Assistance Ratios�•sme.wwr� 56.06% 56.85% Per OSPI Webske
� AfC2 CoSt AlI0W8nCE(fimrer Boackh Index) 5774.26 E780.17 Per OSPI Watisi[e � �
Averege Assessed Valuation(A� SF 52n,�25 Szse,z�s Per Puget Sound ESD
AV-Average of Condominiums 8 Apts. MF 5109,125 599,888 Per Puget Souod ESO
Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 S�.n E�.ea Per King Co.Assessor Report
Generai Obligation Bond Interest Rate a.3a^i a.e�56 nnancet rtero
� Impact Fee-Single Family sF 55,ass as,aas No Change to fee
Impact Fee-Multi-Family MF 33.378 $3,378 No Change to tee
KeM Sehool DiaVIG 5bc-Year CaD��Faeilities Plan .Apol 2011 Paga 31
X
Appendixes
Appendix A: Calculations of CapaciUes for Elementary Schools
Appendix'B: Calculations of Capacities for Middle Schools
. Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities-far Senior High Schools
Appendix D: Use of Relocatables
Appendix E: Student Generation Factor Survey
KeM School DiskiU Siz-Year Capital Fadlities Pkn April 2011 Page 32 .
�KENT�SCHOOL OISTRICT No.416 �
STANDARD of SERVICE'- PR06RAM CAPACrtY -iINVENTORY of REIOCATABLES • FTEandHEADCOUNTENROWIAENT
K S D ..Numbel of '.SMINIgh Cap '6E i IP 'SpBt181 20162011 Pro{yem Claleroom: �RNOn�ebl. 10f1/20/0 '10H/20/0 F
ELBAENiutv I pBq paalfipACep , Capatlly F1L Pmprem Pmprem Uta Uso . Capeairy� W123FfE� P723HticouM �D
SCnOOL Clauioomf rzi��vxew' CR� Ce .Cep�y' n.qauEw neb.refmba� ra.:..w' �Enrdhnent �.Enmmnmt .K°
���.�y�. py�pyqap� � � OECE6K �.8v1DbECE6N 7.0
CertiapB CrBal CC 18 �92 5 20 452 7 0 - 0 132.1/ 482 T
. CetlarValtey CWa 18 192 8 2� 458 Y 0 0 303.50 332 NI
Covhglm COr4 20 �BO 8 21 SW 7 0 0 130.60 I80 H
Creahwotl CW 1B 1,58 2 0 �58 4 1 24 154.00 489 T
EeatHN EH 1B 482 7 41 .478 �9 3: 72 176.08 617 AR
EmerelE Park EP 21 504 2 0 SW �2 0 0 197.6t 690 T
FBUwootl FWh 77 �08 3 0 408 9 0 0 419.72 M9 T
GeppeT.DenielElem DE 18 /32 5 2{ 458 1 0 D �W6.12 4W A
Gknridpe GR 19 A58 d 0 458 2 0 0 488.50 .520 T
Gresa lPke Glfi 18 0.92 1 20 452 1 0 0 �OB.58 4Y1 N
� Horizon HE 21 SOI 2 0 5W 3 0 0 �85.60 501 H
- Jenkhl9Creek JC 15 380 7 11 404 3 1 21 �288.00 S23 AR
Kent Elem. Ifflen 17 108 B 88 478 2 2 48 655.00 555 A
LekeYOUngs Lvm 21 501 7 20 51D 0 0 0 '441.89 4&7 H
MeNnSortun MS 1B 158 3 21 I80 1 7 21 .517.05 680 M
A1BeCOw RIOpe MR/e 17 108 8 88 476 � 0 4 88 520.10 521 A
�MGAAiBfI EIeI1lEnfery A¢R� $1 561 9 20 524 3 2 /B 553.02 585 T
A411Bnnium Elefnentaty Ml 20 /BD 9 24 SM 0 0 0 167.05 528 K
NeelpOErien NO 18 381 5 BB 452 5 5 120 809.64 870 AR
Penlher Lake(N8� PL 15 380 9 98 bSt 0 0 0 531.50 576 AR
Park OrcheN PO 18 432 7 54 488 2 0 0 M6.03 N8 A
PIn8Tre8 PTm 21 504 4 24 628 9 0 0 51023 fi41 K
RMgBN7od RWm 21 bIM 7 0 50/ T 2 48 525.48 681 T
SewyerWootla SW 27 50/ 2 �0 60/ 0 0 0 157.00 4B2 H
�SCenicHlll SH 77 408 B 68 478 J 1 72 6B1.OD SB1 A
�SoosCreek SC/e 17 108 1 0 108 3 0 0 328.50 953 T
SpGgbmDk SB 17 108 5 I4 052 Y 0 0 477.50 - p8 AR
' $ipvye � SFM 21 'S09. - 2 0 SW� 9 0 0 �61200 SH T
NeMMT.VNrqcaamry 6N 11 �358. 3 B0. 41B 0 0 0 88.12 BB � '
. , ' FJementeryTOTAL° 63S -02,880 122� 77B 13.780 68 24 67B 19.18Bd7 13.882
'Elementary cia66man�apaciry le 6aaetl on averpe o124:1&221n K-9,7!M OroAe 4 8 291n Gretlea 5-B.Iridutlea edjueb�nfa fw dasa sVe r�u�tla�a P�D���%.
�Kmt Sdwd Distrkt StendarA ot Service reaerves aome rooms tar pNbut WuBrama. le.TO Tde1=17 SlentlaN�t ComP�.leb+1 MtisiC•1 Intepraletl P�apn9m da89room.
'Demente�Y eGads heve 700X apace utllimtbn rete:� �m�enfal'F.TE repMa qrM�.S FOK @ 1.0-PY23 Meeticamt reP�KeMei9��1.0.�EitluOas.ECE peatlwdce.
°FOK=FWUeyIOrWnga�Om.T=TUNm��6880E-AR=ARRATMeIFwWeGSc�adwlCa,K=KAITitlelFUnde7 A=SlabAppw6mmeMFUiqed�H=HaMDay.Krtidagmmnmiy
�w,n smoa o�;a soc•rea�cepaai Feavu�rm� APPENDIX A Apo so�1 P�e aa
KENT SCHOOL DIBTRICT`No:476
STANDARD of SERVICE - PROORAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY of RELOCATABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT
Kso nm sumw ��w �� s�; 'sceaai' so�azo�+ r� cie�oom w�.�. �avm�o': �m�no�o
MionlE ABR Sttl C�emr' au ai PrOm ;Proyem PmO�sm Usa Use Capeciry PT29 FTE� F�atlmuM�
_ BCHOO� qsrms e12b-29 Cls � Clsims� : Ca�petltY� Rdo�ams R4oauda at29ea. ErudlmeM 'Eruollmenl
a�� a.sxumem aeswu�essx�
CedarHeighhMMdleSdqd CH 32 782 9 93 2 4B 923 0 2 145 7f0.79 772
Mattson Midtlle 3chool MA 24 585 8 59 7 780 793 4 0 0 &B.BB 84B .
Meeker Middle Sclwol MK 33 807 4 5B 1 24 890 0 0 0 833.21 834
Meritlien Middb SCtad MJ 26 W 1 5 84 4 95 790 3 5 145 658.60 857
Mi0 Creak MidAle Stlqd MC 30 729 6 51 2 48 B28 0 2 58 854.00 854
Nortlmood Middle Schod NW 33 807 4 46 6 719 872 0 0 0 85424 855
Kent Mountain view AceCemy f(iradea 3-12) Middle ScFpd G,gde 7.8 EnraIlrtKM See Ekm 88.00 88
MltltlleSthooITOTAL � �178' 4,341 � �33 372 �21 494 198 7� 9 � 34B 4,I43.52 4,248
APPENDIX B
Kso aa s�+ ��� ao.d+� s� sa�' aoio-zo�i rme� aa�oom R�.eb �a�rzom �a�no�o
SENIOR HIGH ABR Sltl Cepao7y ai Fu P1ryn Pmm�pmn Ploprem U98 U88 Cepaaly P713 FfE� FkeOmllnl�
�BC1ro0� Clsrma et 2631 Cls Cisims CepBriry� aelowtabk� nelouteefes at 37 ea. Emollmmt EmdlmeM
� o�w.,eo� a xwe.um pesruemm �
Kent�.�i6enSerriorHigh IN1 53 1,376 8 110 72 288 1,857 3 8 188 7,928.31 7,983
- Kentlake8eniaHiph IQ 58 1,508 72 145 14 933 � 2,157 0 Y 82 1,686.72 7.735
KenMGgBSeniarHiph IQ2 69 1.788 N 723 16 381 �2,270 0 4 124 -2.111.85 2,187
' KenlwootlSeniMFGph KW 65 7,692 5 51 77 391 2,137 S � 93 1,968.60 2.031
KeM MouMein Yiew Atademy(Giedes 3-1� Senior High Grade 9-12 Ercdli�reM See Elem 753.88 759 �
KeM Phoenix Atatlemy PH Non-tradiEOnal High School 350 301.40 315
Repional Justice CeMer � RJ N/A WA 70.00 70
SeniaHighTOTAL 245 6,342 36 429 59 1,394 8,765 8 75 485 8,188.78 8,4Z0�
APPENDIX C �a�R��csmns
cxtilmiood Ee aWdeMa
DISTRICT TOTAL 958 23.643 191 1.679 80 1,888 27,741 73 48 7,389 25.827.18 28.630
' Speaal Proprem oapadty indutles dassroome ropuiAng spedelized use wch as Speciel Education,Cereer 8 Technicel Etlucetion Pmgiams,Computn Lebe.etc.
' secmmry edaa cepmry u aQwrea ror ee5c wui�uon rere.9m p�aee movea m Hs in zooe.ne�need Faarrty use swdy is in a�aese f�zot i-tz
� Enrdhrent Is reporleA m FfE 8 HeatlaouM Datia P223 HeatlmuM exdutles ECE 8 Cdlego-any Runnirp Sfart sNdanb.Full hea0count indudng ECE&RS=27,349.
Some Odels mey be sfi�Uy diflererit tlue ro murMing..
� 79 Jwenues aened at qrq Counry Repimel Jwti�e Center ere iepated eeper�ely for Imtihfiaal Fundup on Fortn E$T2.Totel RJ oouM in OctIXxr 2010 is 29.
KeMStlnWDistriilSiz-VearCepNelFaaliEesPlen Total of Appendices A B 8C apa so�� raee as
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
USE' of�RELOCATABCES
� ScAOdYmr YOtO2071 ��2o11•Y012 �2012-2019 201b2011 2011-2015�. 20162018 20162077
RelocatableUse � No.a su� r».m�� swaan r».m swaan � rro.a sed�w wo.a so�n No.a swa�m ra.a ,see«a
aebrelebbs Caporny Reloolablo Cepetly Relomtnbba Cepetly Relocelebbn Cepedry Rebcmahbe Capeary RebrahEk� C�acMy RebutaNes Cepsrey
Relocatables for dassroom use ae ae ae ae ae ae ae
Rebcetabtes for program use �a 7a �a �s �a �3 ra
(ie.Compuler latis,muslc;etc.)
ElemenWryCapaUtyRequlreC�24 � o 0 7 188 73 ]1i 22 s28 28 62a 10 2�0 17 �08
MldCle School Capadty ReQWred�2B 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I Senior High Capady Requtr00�31 a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
#of Reboatables Utilized ' iz� izi iz� is� izi +a+ +2+
ClasBfoomReWCatadNCapacXyReqWretl 0 0 7 188 13 �12 23 638 26 824 10 210 17 40!
Plan fa Alloption ot Required Classroom Relocateble Fadiilies induded in Finance Plan:
ElemenWry "Z o � ta u ze +u r
Middle.Sahool � o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Senbr High ' o 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total 0 7 1� Z2 26 10 � 77
� Use oi etl6timal�elxalBMp for dassmoms a epetlel programs is bmed on neeU eM Pomations of enrdlmeni et eerh sdad.
� Full Oay KlMeigarten Wil Mdease the neetl fot felOCetabtee at Me elemmfary bvel untll penr�nent tepaiily ran ha p�ovided. ,
� GraOe Level RecoMguratlon�-In 2006.9tli grade shxknle moved to Iu9h sclwd�s aealtnB suffide,rt permairoM�apacm'et mitldle cclaok. .
� Mfquyh rebcafabka ere u67ized tor a witle`2qeb oi W�P�:rN.w wnsWCtlon en0 bWMa'Y edlushrents era timetl b mwm¢a the 2QU6ertienl M 2bC018Eks.
�xsa,owo��rasn�-r�ce�c.ara�� AFPENDIX D Apn12011 PegB35.
KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415
Student GenereBon Factor 3urvey
eww, eh�nen�en Taai S,4 u d e n t s: Sludent Generation Factor
. Sin le Famll Developments aaa u�s Tam e� ees Hs Twm �+ n+s Hs
�nv EBgMGast-PaikYiew-Southritlpe HE 2/9 208 128 �Y8 5b 0.950 0.576 0.128 0.447
+n EastlandMeadowe-KeM SC 1J 19 9 4 8 1.482 0.87t 0.308 0.462
aw F.mfpainte MS BB 35 25 4 8 0.954 0.253 0.040 0.081
»e Fem Crest Eest-KeM SR 171 153 91 ZO 42 0.895 0.632 0.117 0.248
�ao FemCrastVYest-Kent SR 130 H2 75 1B 78 0.882 0.877 � 0.148 0.138
�io HI9FUend 8 Riwdodendron Eatales ML 41 39 20 9 10 0.951 0.488 0220 0.241
m KentlekeHighleMa SW 127 73B &5 17 38 1.087 0.889 0.19/ 0.283
u+ Alerid'mn Ritlge HE 70 31 2d 2 6 O.M3 0.313 0.028 0.071
'aeo Ndth ParkB Meedowe 8 Peiks MeaOOxa South� CW f08 707 58 21 30 1.008 0.628 0.1% 0.283
� PenlFiarMeedowa GR �.32 92 �YO 4 8 1.000 0.825 0.125 0.250
i3u Rose'sMeaAOw ML �J7 17 8 4 4 0.459 � 0.2/3 0.708 0.108
tt Sevene I The Reaerve/Sronelleltl I CioRrn Hille CO 351 370 174 55 147 1.054 0.'488 0.157 0.102
uo Temeredc Ritlge CW 134 73 38 9 25 0.545 0.281 0.087 0.187
+re ThePmks-FarxooNFienton RW 772 159 67 28 58 0.890 0.390 0.183 0.337
�m Tmvitsky Park-Ronton RW 187 131 88 18 24 0.7&1 0.533 0.708 O.1M
�n WooOCreek-COVington CW 1fM 13I 71 22� 38 O.E70 0.18/ 0.143 0247 .
Tate� 2,029, 7,762 983 284 505 0.668 OA86 _ OASO 0.260
� e�,m�y romi S t u d e n t s Student Generetion Fador
e Multl-Femfl Developments nrea unia row E� Ms Hs rorm � rns r+s
as AdepioApv6naMe•Cor'uqlm CA 200 74 43 7 24 0.370 0216 0.035 0.1Y0
�+z AHar6iook ApeNronts•KeM EH 207 135 92 20 23 0.652� O.MI 0.097 0.111
ise qtteneppaRmenb-KeM SH 81 68 M 12 12 O.B40 0.593 0.1de O.tIB
t�e FeirnoodPondApeMier�is-ReMOn FW 190 68 M 7 15 0.340 0227 0.038 0.077
�u PeAcPleceAparbnenN-Kent SH S1 87 56 11 20 1.708 1.098 0.216 0.392
ut Red Mill et Feinwod-Rentun CC 86 21 13 1 7 0.218 0.135 0.070 0.073
ni Riverv'rew-ThePo�ks•Kenl HO 14B 58 24 f0 22 0.978 OABY 0.068 O.UB
�p= qpqtCl9ekL9nding-Npnt SB 2H 93 68 11 18 O.Mt 0.313 0.052 �0.078
. aa SilvarSprirpaApertmeMS'Kent Pl 251 172 118 IB 38 0.885 0.182 O.OM 0.157
�oz� Sunriseal8ensonConEOa-Kent GR 88 26 7 B 12 0.2&1 0.080 0.088 0.198 �
i iaei 1,b2T 787 505 103 189 0.622 0.957 0.087 0.144
K«,c sa�ooi as�cc six-vee�cevnei Fea7a�ea amn APPENDIX E naa zo++ vase se
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
*
CITY OF * � *
* -� WASHINGTON
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
� . (2012 - 2017)
Adopted by Ordinance No. 6394, December 5, 2011 as part of ttie City of
Au6urn Comprehensive Plan
City of Aubwn
25 West Main
Auburn, WA 98001
(253) 931-3000
www.aubumwa.gov
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
s
� ���� �:., .. '�
CITY OF �..-J-�.y _�-,.�* ..
. - .� _ -�"
�. �.
.
. �::: �:
� � ��
� �
� �.�-- �-
�
! � ___ _
,.-� ...�---- �
� � ~` .�---� � � � .
�
� ��
�Y� . .
��
� MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED �
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2012-2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ExecutiveSummary................................................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction
Purpose.................................................................................................................................. 7
Statutory Requirement for Capital Facilities Elements............................................................ 7
Concurrency and Level of Service.......................................................................................... 8
Implementation....................................................................................................................... 8
2. Goals and Policies
1. Capital Facilities Response to Growth .............................................................................. 11
2. Financial Feasibiiity.......................................................................................................... 11
3. Public Heakh and Environment......................................................................................... 13
4. Consistency With Regional Planning ................................................................................ 13
3. Capitallmprovements
IMroduction ............................................................................................................................ 15
Transportadon........................................................................................................................ 17
Arterial Street(102) Capital Projects.................................................................................22
Local Street(103) Capital Projects................................................................................... 74
Street Fund (105) Capital Projeds.................................................................................... 76
Water...................................................................................................................................... 81
SanitarySewer....................................................................................................................... 117
StortnDrainage...................................................................................................................... 131
SolidWaste............................................................................................................................ 155
Parksand Recreation............................................................................................................. 157
General Municipal Buildings...........••...................................................................................... 189
CommunityImprovements...................................................................................................... 197
Airport.....................................................................................................................................215
Cemetery................................................................................................................................ 221
GolfCourse............................................................................................................................ 225
PoliceDepartment.................................................................................................................. 229
ValleyRegional Fire Authority ................................................................................................ 231
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
• � .�- �~����' ��
CITY OF �'=��'�Yf� �-. �
..�...�.� .�.
� � ; ..��
�
�..�� -
�. �_... _
� � � � . �. ., �
:�;�; _ �.
� . ,�.-
�
� :�-�= - .
.�
� ��°�---�^'°""-.�.�"�"� , .
�
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A capital facilities element is one of the corriprehensive plan elemerrts required by
Washington's Growth Management Ad{GMA). Capitai facilities generally have long useful
lives, sign�cant costs and tend not to be mobiie.
The GMA requires that capital facilities elementg include an inventory of existing capital
facilities (showing locations and, capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital
facilities, proposed locations and capackies of new or expanded capital facilities and at
least a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with ident�ed sources of funding. The
GMA also requires that the land use element be reassessed if probable funding falls short
of existing needs.
This document is the City's six-year Capital Faalities Plan (CFP). The CFP, in conjundion
with other Ciry adopted documents, satisfies the GMA reguirement for a Capital Facilities
Element. It addresses one of the GMA's basic tenets, that:is, the provision of adequate
facilfies to support developmenf in accordance witli locally adopted level of service
standards.
This CFP will enable the City to: (1) Make informed decisions about its investment of public
dollars, and (2) Make timely decisions about mairrtaining Ieyel of service in accordance with .
this CFP and other adopted plans.
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT
This CFP consists of the following:
Chapter 1. Introduction Purpose of CFP, statutory requirements,
methodology.
Chapter 2. Goals and Policles Goals and Policies related to the
provision of cap"rtal facilities.
Chapter 3. Capital Improvements Proposed capital projects, which include
the financing plan and reconciliation of
project capacity to level of service (LOS)
standards.
This CFP is a companion documenY to the Capital..Facilities Element of,the Aubum
Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 5). The Capital Facil'¢ies Element of the Aubum
Comprehensive Plan identifies the City's planning approach and policy framework for the
provision of capital facilities. This CFF proyides the background inventory, ident�es
proposed projects and establishes the six-year capital' facilities plan for financing capital
facilities.
The comprehensive plan contains timeframes which are the intended framework for future
funding decisions and within whjch future adions and decisions are intended to occur.
However, these timeframes are estimates, and depending on factors involved in the
processing of applications and ,prnject work, and availability of funding; the timing may
change from the included timeframes. The framework does not represent actual
commitments by the City of Auburn which maydepend on funding resources available.
1
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS
In planning for capital facilities, contemplation of future growth needs to be considered. The
CFP is based on the following Ciry population forecast:
Year Po ulation
2010 68,270
2011 70;180
2017 75,242
The population forecasts are based on infortnation from the State of Washington Office of
,Financial Managemerrt (OFM) as weli as estimates developed by the City of Aubum
Planning and Community Development Department.
GAPITAL COSTS OF FACIUTIES
Baseii on tlie analysis of capital improvements contained in this,-document, the cost of City-
owned and managed capital improvements for 2012-2017 is summarized as follows: .
e of Facil' 2012-.2017
TranspoRation-Arterial(102) $ 64,615,700 � �
` Transportefion,-Loca/(103J 12,000,000
. Transportation-Sheet(105) 9,400,000
Water . 38,587,100
Sanitary Sewer. . 17,253,700 �
Storm Dieinage-. , 21,567;500
Pa11cs&Recreation � 35,592,800
Genera/Municipa/8uildings 5,348,400
Communily lmprovemenis . 7,44Z,800
" vpoR 1.389,500
. Cemetery 90,000
GoIL Course 350,000
_ Total $ 273,642,500
2
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES
The financing plan for the ci4ywide capital improvements includes:
Fundin Source 2012-2017 � C ital Facii'
Grants 47,864,000 Transportation
(lndudes grant funding tfiat has nof 5,729.100 Parks& Recreation
been secured) 116,100 Community Improvements
951,000 Airport
UserFees/FundBalance 38,510;100 Water
16,601,700 Sewer
20,762,500 Storm Drainage
1,662,000 Gommunity Improvements ,
640,000 Equipment Rental
438,500 Airport
90,000 . Cemetery
350.000 , Goff
rteria/Street Fund 4.182,800 - Transportation
Bond Proceeds 77,000 Water
652,000 Sewer
205,000 Stortn Drainage
8,000,000 Parks & Recreation
170,400 Communi Im rovements
Munici al Parks Fund 1,629.500 Parks 8 Recreation
Pro Tax 12,000,000 Trans rtation
Uti!' _Tax 9.400,000 Trans ortation_
MitigationAmpact Fees 6,123;300 Transportation
180,000 Commun' Im rovements
Genera/Fund - 2.520.000_ _ .Commun' Im rovemenis
REET 1 679,100 Parks 8-Recreation
4,208,400 General Munici al Buildin s
REET 2 2,099,300 Community Improvements
75,000 Trans ortation
Other Sources 6,370,600 Transportation
600,000 Storm Drainage
19,555,100 Parks 8 Recreation
1,200,000 . Communi Im rovements
Total S 213,642,500
3
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SUMMARY OF IMPAGTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
The foreqasted impacts of new capital facilities on the Citys future operating budgets(2013-2018)
are as follows:
Bud et Year: 2013 2014 " 2015 2016 2017
2018-_ Total
1 TrenspoitaUon $ 32,430 $ 68,980 $ 95,807 $ 95,807 $ 101.907.. $ 111,907 $ 506,838
s, wa�e. - i;zoo �,200 �,20o i,zoo izao s�000
.3� Senitary Sewer - - - - - - -
4 Stoim Drainage - -� - - - - � -
S So!!d Waste - - - - - - -
��B� ParksarrdReeieaSon � 219,000 - 224,000 224,000 �229,000 229,000 229,000 � 1�,354,000
7 Gerreral MuMclpal Buildf�s - - - -� -. ._ _
8. Communlfy lmprovemenes - - - - - . -
8 Alrport - - - - - - -
10 Cemetery - - - - - - -
11 GoH Course - - - - - - -
12 Senlor Center - - - - - - -
� 13 Pollce Deparbnent - - - - .- . - � _
14 Fire DepartmeM - - - - - - -
� � • Total S 251,430 S 294.180 S 321,D07 S 326,00� S 332,107 -�5�342.707 E 7.868,838
4
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP
Based on the proposed six-qear cap'ital projects and 4He projected population increase of
5,062 (6.7%), the LOSfor the following City-owned public facilities will change as follows:
The LOS for the following facilities will be increased as a resuk of the CFP, comparing the
2011 LOS to the projecteci 2017 LOS. .
CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2011 LOS 2017 LOS
Pro'ected
Cemefe Burial Plots er 1,000 Po . 45:17 . 58.60
Commun' Parks Aaer er 1,000 Po . 3.25 3.82
Genera/Munici (Buildin s :FL er1,000Po . 3,559.65 3;586.07
Nei hborhood Parks Aaes -r 1;000 Po .. 0.70 0:77 ,
The LOS for the following faoilities wili be maintained as a result of the CFP.
CAPITAL FACILITY LOSUNITS 2011 LOS 2017'LOS
(Projec[ed)
Roads Volume/Ca eci Ratio D" "D"
j iY %Arr O eretlons Su ort 100% 100%
Sen/ta Sewer Residential GPCPD Note 7 758.00 158.00
Storm Drain e /V//1
yy��_ ResidenUa/GPCPD (Note 1) - 236.00 236.00
Note 1: GPCPD=Gallons per Customer per Day
The LOS for the following facilRies will be decreased as a result of the CFP, comparing the .
2011 LOS to the projected 2017 LOS..
CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNRS 2011 LOS 2017 LOS
Pro'ected
Cit Jail Beds er i,000 Po . 0.77 0.72
Fire Protectian ratus r 1,000 Po . 0.14 0:13
Go!!Course Aaes er 1.000 Po . 0.26 , 0.24
nearParks Aaes er 1,000 Po . 0.45 0.42
O en S ace Acies ec 1,000 Po . 2.84 ' 2.64
SeniorCenter S . Ft. rf,000Po . 179.54 16Z46
s �8i u�.a.aes a�s ��.000 n� . o.n o.n
Level of Service (LOS) is a common measure used to determine the e�ciency of
effectiveness of services. FortHe City of Aubum, LOS targets serves as a means to assess
the adequacy of public facilitiies in meeting the needs of the populatiomfor which it serves.
For euample, in the case of paric space, when there is an increase in.population without a
corresponding ,increase in park acreage, the LOS unit of ineasure (acres per 1,000
population.) will decline, indicaUng a, potential need to increase the total amount of park
acreage to keep pace with population growth. On the other hand, a slight increase in
population, coupled Hrith a large increase in facilities, wiil result in an increased LOS. For
example, facilities §uch as buildings or burial plots may be constructed or expanded to keep
pace with anticipated population growth. While this will have the effect of increasing LOS in
the short-term, in the longer=tertn, the LOS will graduaily decline to the targeted level based
on forecasted population. The-impad of population growth to the tOS for facilities wili vary
depending on the type of facilit�i and long range planning by the City.
5
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS
Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP)are principally the
comprehensive plans for the various public facilities included in this CFP:..Tfiese individual
comprehensive plans provide detailed identification of projects and identify their(projects)
proposed funding souroes.
City documents include:
• City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Element (2010); .
• City Municipal Airport Master?lan Update (2001-2020);
• City Comprehensive Water Plan (2009);
• Ciry Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2010)and Six Year Transportation
Improvement Program (2012-2017);
• City Comprehensive Drainage Plan (2009);
• City Comprehensive SewerPlan (2009);
• City 2011-12 Biennial Budget and 2010 Annual Financial Report; and,
• Master plan update for parks, as well as numerous other planning and financiai
documenfs.
All documents are available for public inspection at the City of Aubum.
6
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
PURPOSE
The Capital'Facilities Plan (CFP) is a.6-year plan (2012-2017)for cap'rtal improvements that
support the City of Aubum's current and future growfh.
In this plan, funding for general govemment projects is identfied. To maintain consistency
with individual master and uUlity comprehensive plans, applicable projects in the 6-year
window of those master/util_ity,pians are included in this CFP. The CFP also identfies LOS
standards, where applicable,for each public facility.
STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS
RCW •36.70A.070(3)(d) requires. that the comprehensive plan capital facilities element
indude "a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding
capacities and clearly iden�es sources of public money for such purposes.° RCW
36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have "probable funding" to pay for capital
facility needs;or else the City must"reassess the land use element"
In addition, the capitai facilities element must include the location and qpacity of existing
faciiities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed,iocations and capacities. ?he State
Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accompiished for
water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, schools,parks and recreation
facilities, police and fire protection facilities.
The GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital faciiities. As a
resutt, public facilities in the CFP should be based on quant�able, o6jective measures of
capacity such as traffiavolume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In
some instances, though, level of service may be.st be expressed in terms of qualitative
statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility. Factors that influence local level
of service standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, hational and local
standards, and federal and state mandates.
To be effectiye, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines
suggest tHat the CFP be updated a4 least every two,years. in 2007, the City transitioned to
a biennial budget. With this in mind, tHe City will follow these guidelines and update the
CFP every two years, incorporating the capital facilities improvements in the.City's biennial
budget process.
7
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE
Concurrency
The GMA requires 4hat jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place oravailable within
a specified time frame whem development occurs. This concept is called concurrency.
Under the GMA, concurrency is required for transportation facil'dies, and is recommended
6y the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer:
Concurrency has a direct.relationship to level of service. The importance of concurrency to
capital faciiities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the �evel of service
for a capital facility below the locally adopted minimum.
Explanation of Level of Service
As indiqted earlier, the GMA requires that level of service be established for certain
transportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrency to development proposals.
The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of level of service standards for other
capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public facilities.
Typicaily, measures of level of service are expressed as ratiosof facility"capacity to
demand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1lists generic examples oflevel of service
measures for some capital facilfies:
TABLE 1-1
Sample Level of Service Measurements
T e of Facili Sam le Level of Seniiae Measure
Genera/Municipal Buildings Square feet p.er1,00.0 population - -
Parks Aaes per 1,000 population
Roadsand Streets Ratio of actual volume to design capacity
Sewer/Wa'ter Gallons per customer per da
The need for capitel facilities is largely determined by a community's adopted LOS
standards and whether or not the community has fortnally designated capitaPfacilities, other
than transportaf'ion, as necessary for development to meet the;concurrency test The CFP
itself is therefo�e largelyinfluenced by the selection of the level of service standards. Level
of service standards are measures of the quality of liFe of the City. The standards should be
based on the Cify's vision of'its future and its values. '
IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. 'Tlie CFP is
sensitive to funding and reveaue availability and therefore needs to be constantiy monitored
against variations in available resources. To facilitate its implementation, the CFP should 6e
kept current.
8
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
Update of Capital Facilities Plan
Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFF current is to update it regularly so the six-.
year plan is a rolling CFP.. Again, the State recommends thaf the CFP be updated aY least
biennially.
The City of Aubum will seek to update the CFP biennially in conjunction with the budget
process. Future updates will consider.
A. Revision of population projections, including annexations;
B. Update of inventory of public facilities;
C. Update of costs of public facilities;
D. Update of public facilities requirements analysis (actual level of service
compared to adopted standards);
E. Update of revenue forecasts;
F. Revise and deyelop.capital improvement projects for the.next six fiscal
years;and,
� G: Update analysis of financial capacity.
Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to level of service standards, capital
projects; and/or the financing pian sources of revenue are ali actions 4hat can keep the CFP
currerrt and relevaM to City decision-making. -
9
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
�°`�
� ,� '"' --� � � `�
CITY OF � } "Y� �
.
, ,�, _ ...__....-,--'"��,-�' : : �
�� .�..-
.� -
� � �
� � � � �
�� m��
.�°::-�• �-,. „�.,.,
�`" �, " >
�. ,.=r� �- _ .�
� n .�r�,•.� �.�''`"y°`
_Y"''�.
�k M�RE THAN YOU IMAGINED
,o
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 2
GOALS AND POLICIES
This chapter iderdifies goals and policies specificto the City's provision of qpital facilities.
Goal 1 Provide a variety of responses to the demands of growth on public
facilities.
Policy 1.1 Establish Jand use pattems that optimize the use of public facilkies.
Policy 1.2 Provide additional public faciliry capacity when existing faalities are used to
their maximum level of efficiency (consistent wi4h adopted standards for level
of service).
Policy 1:3 . Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an
efficient manner.
Policy 1.4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program:
1.4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.26.095, 58.17.033 or 58.17.170.
1.4.2 DevelopmeM that creates no added impact on public facilitiea
1.4.3 Expansions of existing developmenfthatwere disclosed and tested
for concurrency as part of the original application.
Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the Clty to
fund or within the City's authority to require others to provide.
Policy 2.1 Establish Ievel of service standards that;are achievable with the financing
plan of this Capital Facilities Plan.
Policy 2.2 Base the financing plan for public facilities on realistic estimates of current
local revenues and extemal revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be
received by the City.
Policy 2.3 Match revenue.sources to capital projects on the basis of sound fiscal
policies.
2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs fhrough utility enterprise
funils, based on user fees and gFants. Public facilities included in
utilities are sewer, solid waste, storm drainage, and water.
2.3.2 .Where feasible pursue joint venture faality construction,
construction timing, and other:facility coordination measures for City
provided facilities, as well as with school districts and other
potential partners in developing public facilifies.
2.3.3 The Gity shall continue to assis4 through direct participation, LIDs
and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially
feasible. Where funding is available, the City may participate in
developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to
the extent that the improvements benefR the broader public interest,
and are consisterrt with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan.
il
City ofAuburn CapitalFacilities Plan
Policy 2.4 If the projeded funding is inadequate to finance needed-public faciliUes and
utiikies based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth,
the City_will do one or more of the following fo achieve a balance between
available revenue and needed public facilities:
2.4.1 Lower the level of service standards; �
2.4.2 Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources;
2.4.3 Adopt new sources of revenue;
2.4.4 Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense;
and/or
� 2.4.5 Amend the Land Use Element to reduce the need for additional
public facilities.
Policy 2.5 Both existing:and future development will pay for 4he costs of needed capital
improvements.
2.5.1 Ensure that existing development pays for capital improvements
that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or
all of the cost to replace obsolefe or wom out facilifies,. Existing
development may also pay a portion of the cost of oapital
, improvements needed by future development.: Existing
developmenYs payments may take the form of user fees, charges
forservices, special assessments and taxes.
2.5:2 : Ensure that future.development pays a proportionate share of the
- cost of new facilities which it requires. Future development may
also. pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or wom-out
facilities. Future tleyelopment's payments may take the fomi of
voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility; impact;
fees; mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land,
provision of public facilkies, and future payments of user's fees,
charges for services, special assessments and taxes.
Policy 2.6 The City will determine the priority of public facility capital improvements
using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue source that
cannot be used for the highest priority will be used,beginning with the highesY
priority for which the revenue can legally be expended.
2.6.1 Projects that eliminate hazardous conditions.
2.6:2 Refurbishment of existing facilities thaY contribute to achieving or
maintaining standards for adopted level of service.
2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in
level of service fo�existing demand.
2.6.4 New or expanded facilities that proyide the adopted level of service
for new development and redevelopment during the next six fiscal
years.
2.6.5 Capital improvements that signficantly reduce the operating c�st of
providing a service or facility, or othervvise mitigate impacts of
public facilities on future operating budgets.
12
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
2.6.6 Capital improvemenfs that contribute to stabilizing and developing
the economy of the City.
2.6.7 Project priorities may also involve additional criteria that are unique
to each type of public facility, as described in otherelements of this
Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 2.7 Ensure that:the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility
are financially feasible prior to construating the.facility.
Goal 3 Protect public health, enyironme�l, quality, and neighborhood
stability and viability through the appropriate design and installation of
public facilities.
Policy 3.1 Promote conservation of energy; water and other natural resources in the.
location and design of public facilities.
Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilkies wherever
combined sewers may be discovered.
Policy 3.3 Practice efficient and environmentally responsible maintenance and
operating procedures.
Policy 3.4 The siting, design, construction and improvement of ali public buildings shall
be done in fuli compliance with the Ainericans with Disabilities Act (ADA). '
Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stabil'ity and growth through strategic
investments in public facilities and public private/partnerships.
Goal 4 Make the Capital Facilities Plan conslstent with other elements of the
comprehenslve plan, and - to the extent feasible - with other city,
county; regional'and state adopted plans.
Policy 4.1 Ensure :that the growth and development assumptions used in the Capital
Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of
the comprehensive plan.
Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non�ity providers of public facilities on a joint program for
maintaining applicable level of service standards, concurrency requirements,
funding and construction of public facilities.
Goal 5 Provide pubqafacilities that proyide a sense of community that is
inclusive of diver�se populations.
Policy 5.1 Contribute to commun_itypride and foster a sense of community through
provision of public facilities that create a community gathering place for
neighbors;family and friends.
Policy 5.2 ?hrough provision"of public facilfies offer a broad range of activities
promoting social interactions especially with new residents.
Policy 5.3 Provide maximum flexibility and multiple uses through design of public
facilities that are adaptable to changing interests.
Policy 5.4 Provide a community center facility that is financially feasible, affordable for
participants, and cari generate revenue to offset a portion of the opera6ng
costs.
13
City ofAuburn CapitaTFdcilities Plan
� ��� � ��
,���'� � .��
CITY OF � � �
.
��� r�� �,��-
,���.^ ..�" �,-��✓"'" �
, �, ,
� ,� �-��^�" .�»-� �
r."^`
"""^.'._..._ .'_;� -.� �-..._ �,. _e--�^ .::�
�, . . . . , 1 . . .,- .,-i..;.. .' . ' " .
ir, -- _
� '�y''^� - � .
."^ .�,.^�'.`
.� �, _ "
�C a �„.✓`� . �,,r�� ' ' . . � .
,n��:µW "ab ...��i�L^.." �'� . •
���
� �k 1VIORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
14
City ofAuburn Capitdl Facilities Plan
CHAPTER 3
CAPITALIMPROVEMENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
This CFP inGudes City capitat improvement projects, and the finandng plan to pay for
those projects. k.also contains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies level of
service standards, where applicable. Each type of City public facility is presented in a
separate subsection that follows a standard fortnat. Throughoukthis section, tables of data
are identified with eb6reviations tFiat correspond to the type of facility; For example, Table
W-1 refers to 7able 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreviation corresponds
to the name of the type of facili4y.
1. Narrative Summarv
This is an overviewof the data, with sections devoted to Current Facilities, Level of Service,
Capital FacilRies Projects and Financing, and Imqact,on Future Operating Budgets.
2. Inventorv of Facilities (Table X-.1)
This is a list of ezisting capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to level
of service), and location. This fable also inciudes any proposed capita4 projects and the
planned inventory total aspf December 31, 2017.
3. Caoital Proiects and Financina Plan (Table X-2. X-2A antl X-261
This is a list of capital improvements that identifies existing deficiencies, ident�es facilities
needed'for future growth, and identifies the repairing or replacing of obsolete or wom out
facilities through December 31,2017. Each list shows the proposed financing plan foliowed
by individual worksheets showing the projed detail.
4. Imoact on Future Ooeratina Budaets (Table X-3)
This is a list of new capital projects and the forecasted impacts on the Citys future
operating budgets (2013—2018).
15
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
�, -;M.��-�„ �C �- a`�
�.
�
C ITY OF .���=�.��_,�.�..�.�~����`��
.� - .�-- ..;�
��---- -�. y` �....- .-�-
_.._. _...
..�--� ::�^.�`- '_"" �`a • .
.�� �
��,.,.v.. -,-� -r,
,
»- y;, - ,�'--` �; ,,
,,.�r."'".. ��^' �," ��.. .
� * � � �� f �� . . _ � . . � . .
. �✓"'-' . . . . ..
?k MORE THAN YOU� IMAGINED
16
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TRANSPORTATION
CurrenY FacilRies
Roadwavs: The City's roadway system consists of a network of limited access freeways and
216 miles of arterials, collectors, alieys and local streets. Tatile T-1 "Aubum Comdor Level of
Service" includes the most current Level of Service (LOS) for each defined arterial roadway
corridor:
Transit: Metro; Sound Transit and Pierce Transit provide transiY service to the Aubum area.
Aubum is currenUy served by nine Metro.bus routes; two Metro operated Sound Transit bus
routes, one Pierce Transit operated 6us route for Sound Transit and one Pierce Transit bus
route. Six park and ride ?acilities with a total of 1,127 parking spaces also serve Aubum.
Eighteen Sound Transit "Sounde�' commuter raii trains stop at Auburn each weekday at the
Au6um staUon located at 23 A Street SW. The Sounderalso provides speciai event service to
selected sporting events.
Level of Service (LOS) ,
Washington's Growth Management Acf"(GMA) requires seivice level standards for both arterials
and transR routes: The GMA requiresthat eacFi jurisdiction's L:evel of Service (tOS) shandards
be coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the standards and the
methods used are up to the local jurisdictions.
Under GMA, 4he focus is on the pertormance of the whole'road system, not on individual
intersections or roadways. Levef of service standards are a tool to help keep the transportation.
system in balance with the needs of future population growfh and development.
A methodotogy and_'set of standards have:been drafted for the City of Aubum,C.omprehensive
Plan. The standards,help determine concuirency (i.e., balance) between Vansportation and land
use elements of the City'§ Comprehensive Plan, as required by GMA. The City has four ..
choices if it finds the standards cannot be met.
• ModiTy the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to �
minimize traffic.
• Construct additional transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new
development.
. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures.
• Relax the LOS standards: The City can accept lower level of service standards to
encourage further growth and minimize the need for addifional transporta6on facilities.
?he Transportation Land Use Balance will be monito�ed: through the City's Concurrency
Management System as part of the $tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Transportation
concurrency will be evaluated for key facilities and on a system-uvide basis. By having system-
17
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
wide and facility-based roadway LOS standards, the City of Aubum can define preliminary
capacity needs.
The City and WSDOT can then begin to plan corridor studies that will define the characteristics
and location of a particular roadway improvement. At the project level, the State Environmental _
Policy Act (SEPA) process will continue to guide the more spec�c planning and analysis efforts. .
Uses of Level of Service Standards
As measures of transportation system effectiveness, level of service standards can help
jurisdidions identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and virhen
development or growth will affect system operation. Level of service provides a standard below
which,a transportation facility orsystem is not considered adequate.
Level of service standards can be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the
surrounding road system. They can assure 4hat all developments are served by a safe, effcient :
antl cost-effedi4e road system. They can also be used to identifjrproblems, suggest �emedial �.
actions; and apportion costs between public and private sources. LOS standards are a
cornerstone in the development of equitable traffic impact fee systems, which requires
developments to pay some of the costs for improvements to the transportation infrastructure.
In July 2001, the City implemented a traffic impad fee. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate
traffic impacts more.equitably while making the costs of developmeM more predicfable to -
developers. In 2U07, the City implemented an additional transportation impact fee,to address
the impacts of Fieavy truck usage on the City's transportation system. Both fees are regularly
updated to enable the city to construct road capacity to meet the traffic demand of development.
Measuring Transportation System Performance , , �
Arterial Corridor LinkLevel. The level of service forroadway segments or links isanalyzed with
two primary purposes in.mind. First, this site-specific LOS can be used, with the help of a travel
demand model, to'evaluate areas of congestion �nrithin a transportation network-leading to the
development of a long-range-transportation facilities plan. •
Traffic forecasts from the model will be analyzed to detertnine where capacity imqrovements
should be,considered. Second, arteriai corridor LOS analysis is used to assess concuRency or
if facilities are meeting the LOS standards. � � .
The Cityof Aubum currently uses Synchro 7T"' traffic models to estimate LOS. Syncfiro 7'"'
� incorporates Higfiway Capacity Manual (HCM2000) Urban Street LOS methodology. Urlian'
Street LOS is based on average travel speed though a defined corridor. Table T-1 shows the 42, _.
defined street corridors; LOS standards and most �ecent calculated LOS. Table T-1 b shows the
relationships between LOS, sVeet classification, average travel speed, and free flow speed.
18
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-1
Aubnrn Corridor Level of Service
• •
� . .. . . . ��•
1 Aubum Way North 1Sth St NE Northem C' Limits D C/D
2 Aubum Way North East Mam Si. 15th Si NE E D
3 Aubum Way South East Main St M St SE D F/E
4 Aubum W Soufh M St SE Eastem Ciry Limits D C
5 M StlHarvey Aubum Way North East Main St E C
6 NI SUHarvey East Main St Aubum Way South D D/C
7 Evergreen Way Lakeland Hills Way Kersey Way D Future
8 37Th St NFJNW West Vali H f SL NE D B/C
9 15th St NElNW West Valley Hwy Aubum Way North F"' D
t0 Aubum Ave i"A"St SR 18 Southem " Limits D B
11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D C
12 15th St SW e.st Vali FI C St S1N D D
13 C St SW Ellingson SR 18 D C/E
14 WestVaOey Fivvy Northem City Limits 15th SVeet NW E B!C
15 S 277th St Frontage Rd. 108th Ave SE E E/B
16 R SilKersey W Aubum W 5. O�avelz Road D A/B
17 Lake Tapps Parkwa East Valley Hwy. 182nd Ave E D B
18 "A°St SW/NW1'B"St NW 4th St NW S 277th St D Future
19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd. Aubum Wa North 132nd Ave SE E C/B
20 O St MNi/Emerald Doums Dr S 277th St 15U�St NW D A/B
21 I St NE S 277th St Harve Rd D A16
ZZ 132nd Ave SE SE 282nd St SE 312th St D B
23 124th Ave SE SE 282nd St SE 320th.St D C
24 104th Ave SE/SE 304th St 8th St NE 132nd Ave SE D B!A
25 105th PI SEiSE 320th St Lea Hill Road 124th Ave SE D B
26 Lakeland Hl�W SE Lake Ta fla Oravetz Rd D C/D
27 29th St SEIRiverwalk Dr. A Street SE Aubum Wa South D C
28 108th Ave SEl112th Ave.SE S 277th St SE 304ih S2 D A
29 49th St NW B St NW S 277th St D Future
30 R Stree1 SE 8th St NE 4th Straet SE D BJC
31 3rd St SW/Cross St C Street Aubum Wa South E E
32 179�St SE A�SE Aubum Wa South D B!A
33 41st St SEIEIIin son Rd A St SE Westem C' Limits E F
34 Lakeland H�is Wa /Orave� East Vatie Kerse W E AIB
35 West Valley Hwy 15th Street NW Southem C' Limits E C/B
36 iN Ordvetz Road Soulhem Ciiy Lirnits D A
37 5. 316th SVeeVferrace Drive West Valle Hi hwa Westem C' Limits D B
38 S.296th StreeU65th Ave West Vaile H' Westam C�itity limlts D B
39 51 st Ave S. S.288th Street Peasle Can n Rd D B
40 S.284th Street 112th Ave SE 124th Ave 8E D BiA
41 S.284th Street 124th Ave SE 132nd Ave SE D Future
42 R S2, dc O"�amond M Street SE SR 1 S D Future
Cortidor segments within Downrown Aubum may operate at LOS E in aaordance with the Aubum Downtown Plan.PJI other arterial and collector
cortidors must operate at LOS D or better,unless othervnse indicated in Table 2-2.
� Spld LOS indicates direcGOnal LOS in either the East-West a NorthSouth direction. Ofherwise,the LOS is the same in both diredioru.
" ToFal travel 6me in the eastbound direction rannot exceed 1000 seconds for this cortidor W meet the LOS Standard.
The following Tables (T-la, b, and c) address LOS Definitions, Urban Street Corridor LOS and
Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS Standards.
19
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
Table T-1a Definition of Arterial Level of Service (LOS)
Level of Service A-describes primarily free flow operations at average Vavel speeds; usuaily about 90 percerrt
of the free flow speed for the arterial class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in fheir ability to.maneuvec.
within the traffic sheam. Stopped delay at signalized intersections is minimal.
Level of ServiceB-represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average Vavel speeds, usually about 70
percent of the free flow speed for the arterial Gass. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only
siighUy restricted and stapped delays are not bothersome. Drivers are not generally_subjeded to appreciable
tension.
Level of Service C -represents stable conditions; however,ability to maneuver and change lanes in mid block
loca4ion may be more resfricted than in LOS B, and longer queues andlor adverse signal,coordination may
contri6ute,to loweraverage travel speeds ofabout 50 percent of the average free flow speed for ttie arterial
class. Motorists will experience tension while driving.
Level of Serviee D-borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in
approach delay and, hence, decreases in arterial speed. This may be due to adverse signal progression,
inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40
percent of free flow speed.
Level of Service E=characterized by significant approach delays and averege travel speeds of one-third the
free flow speed or lower. Such operetions are caused by some combinaUOn of adverse progression, high signal
density, extensive queuing at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
Level of Senrice F-characterizes arterial flow at exVemely low speeds below one-third to one-quarter of 4Fie
free flowspeed. intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized IocaGons,with resuftant high approach _
dela . Adverse ro ression is fre uentl a contributor to this condition.
Souroe: 19&S�.Highwey Capaeity.Manual,Special Report 209,Transportation.Research Board�,Washington,D.C. 1985,page 11-0�. ' '
The characteristics of the six Ievels of service are summarized.
Figure T-1 b Urban Street Corridor LOS
Corridor LOS -
Urban Street Class I II III IV .
FFS-Ran e mi/h 55�5 45-35 35-30 35-25
FFS mi/h 50 40 35 30
� LOS Avera e Travel S eed mi/h
A >42 >35 >30 >25
B 34-42 >2&35 >24-30 >19-25
C 27-34 >22-28 >18-24 >13-19
D 21-27 >17-22 >1418 >9-13
E 16-21 >13-17 >10-14 >7-9
F 516 513 510 <_7
There are six levels of service on a scale of A to F. LOS A represeMs the best operating �
conditions, and LOS F the worst. -
The LOS scale has been adopted by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the
Transportation Research Board, and by most jucisdiction§throughout the country. The scale is
also accepted and generally understood by the public and elected officials.
20
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
Level of Service Standards-The LOS standards shown in Table T-1 c apply to the facility's
Iocation and its fundional classification.A more specfic description of the level of service
methodology is provided in the City of Aubum Comprehensive Transportation Pian (2009).
Table T- 1c Draft Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS•Standards
Roadwa /Intersection Maximum V/C Ratio/LOS
rterral Comidor(Capacity) "D"for each arterialJink,except for croNector resldenUa!aReriels
which are "C
Si nalized Intersection 'ro"
Unsi nalized Intersection D"
Reiationshio to Concurrencv Manaaement- Concurrency inyolyes matching public facilities and
new development: The'GMA extends c'oncurrency to transportation faciliUes by requiring that
new.developmerrt be served by adequate roads and publiatransportation service, and that
development is no4permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of
service standards that a�e adopted by locaf govemments in their comprehensive plans.
Concurrency (Adequate Public Facilities)
In compliance with the GMA, adequate transportation system facilfties must be avaitable within
six(6)years of the time of occupancy and use of new deveiopment:
Capital Facilities Projects and,Financing
The City's transportation facilities include projects totaling $86,015;700. Tables T-2, T-2A and
T-26 show the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project
detail'.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
As Table T-3 shows, operating budge4 impacts of$506,838 are forecasted for transportation .
facilities during the siic years 2013=2018.
21
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJEGTS AND FINANCING _ �
TRANSPORTATION -ARTERIAL STREET
2U12 2013 2014 2015 2D16 2017 Tolal
�Caoackv Proiects: � - — - -
1 A Street NW.Phase 1 . .
Capital Costs T,687,500 - - - - 1,687,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestric[ed SVeet Revenue . 18,500 - - - - -. 18,500
Grants 785,000 - - - .. , 765,000
- Traffic Impad Fees - 684,000 - - - - �- 684,000
� Other 200.000 Z00,000
4 I SVeet NE Cortidu
Capifal CosLS 409,300 - - - - 1,000,000 1,409,300
Funding Sources:
Unreshicted Street Revenue - - - - _ _
G2rrts - - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - . . .
� Other . 409,300� � - � 409,300
5 M Street Grede Separation ,
Capiql Casts 7,549,700 8,935,000 - - - - 16,484,700
Long-TertdDebt - - 120,500 120,500 120;500 120,$00 482,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - _ _
G2MS 4:791.500 4,208,500 - - . ._ 9,p00,000
T2flic Impact Fees 661,400 1,500,000 120,500 120,500 120;500 120,500 2,643,400
PWTF Loan - 1,977,100 - - - - 1,977,100
Other(OtherAgendes) 2,096,800 1.249,400 __3,3d6,2G0.
6 South 277th-Aubum Way NeRh to Green River Brfdge
Capital Costs � - - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000
Funding Sources: � �
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - _ _ .
Granffi - - - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000
Trafic Impact Fees • - - - - - -
Other(POrt o/SeaWe)
8 .A'Street NW.Phase 2 .
Capital Costs . - - - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000
Funding Sources: � '
Urirestricted Street Revenue - - - - - _ .
Grants - - - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000
Tra�c Impad Fees - - - - - ... . . . . _ .
Other -
9 D Streat NW,97th to 44th
Capital Costs - - - - - 300,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - _ _ .,
GraMS - - - - - 250,000 2i0,000
Tratfic Impac[Fees 50,000 50,000
22
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T=2(continued) ` • .
�� �� :2012 2013 2014 � Y015 - � 2076 201t Total -
�j�Caoaekv ProieUS: � . - . . . .
'10 F 36eet SE,4th.to AWS�
CapitalCosS � - - 250,000� 2250,000 - - , 2.WOA�O
. . Funding Sources: , .
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - �- - - -
� GraMS - - 200;000 2,000,000 - - 2,200.000
, Traffic Impact Pees ' - �'50;000 ' 250,000 - - ��300,000
. 11 M Street NE,.E Main W 4th � .
Capitel Costs ' • - 50,000 275;000 1,150,000 - - 1.475,000
Funding Sources: �
Unrestricted Street Revenue � - - - - - - -
Grants� � - - 225,000 1,000,000 - - 1,225,000
Tra�c Impact Fces � �50,000 �50;000 150,000� - 250A00
14 West Yalley Hvry ImprovemeMS(SR-78 W West Main Street) ` �� �
� � Capital Cosis � � 5,000 � - - � - � - - 5,000
Funding Souroes: �
Unrestricted Street Revenue 5;000 - - . - - - 5,000
Grants - - - - - - •
Traific Impact Fees ' � - �
15 8th Street NE Widening(Pike S6eet to R Sfreet NEf �
CapBel Costs � - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestrided Street Revenue �- - - - - - -
Grants �- - 360,000 �800,000 - - 1,160,000
Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 . _ 200,000 - 290,000
�7 Marvey Road&8th Street NE trrterseetlon Improveme�rts
Long-Tertn DeM 87,300 86.900 86,500 86,000 85,600 85,200 517,500
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - •
Grants - - - - - ' '
PWTF - - ' ' - ' -
� TreffclmpactFees - � �- 87,300 86,900 �88,500 86,000 85,600 85,200� 517,500
18 Bth Street NE and�SE 704th St IMeesecdon ImprovemeMS -
Capifal Costs �332,000 - - - - - 332,000
Funding Sources: �
Unrestricted Street Revenue 157,000 - - - - - - 157,000
Grants 50,000 - - . - - - 50.000
REET2 . . 75,000 - - , . - - - 75,000
Other(Redflex) 50,000 - - - 50,000
20 Aubum Way South and M Street SE Irrteraedioahnprovemenfs �
Capifal Costs 75,000 1,000,000 - - - - ' 1,075,000
. Funding Sources.
Unrastricted�.StreetRevenue 75,000 - - - - - 75,000
Grants - 850,000 - - - - 650,000
TraKcMitigatlon.Fees �150,000 �� - - 150.000
23 BNSF/E.Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass - � .
.Capital CosLa - - - - - 4,800,000 d,800,000
, Funding Sources:.
UnrestrictedStreetRevenue - - - - - - -
Grents - - . -. - - 4,550,000 �0.'�.000
� � Other(KC 8 Ofher) - ' - - 250,000 250.000
23
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
2072 2013 2014 2015 2016_ _ _2077_ _ c- _TOtal
.. TI Caoaeilv Proiects: - . � , � . '
24 Academy D�ive AAultillse Trafl. � . ' ,
Capitai Casts - - - 50,000 425,000 425,000 900,000
Funding Sources:
Unreshicted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 42,500 42,500 755,000 _
, Grants - - - - 362,500 382.500 765,000
Olher _ _ . . . ..
�39 124th Ave SE Cortidor Improvementa Phase 1 • �
Capital Costs - - - - 100,000 ' 750,000 � � SSO,ODO
Funding Sources:
UnreskiCed Street Revenue - - - - - � '� - �
Grants - - - - 85,000 850,OOU. 735,000
Traific Impact Fees - 15,000 . .100,000,. . NS,000
40 124M�Ave SE Cortidor Improvements Phase 2 . . ,
Capital Costs � 50,000 150,000 1,750,D00 - - - ' -� 1,950,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - • - - - -
Grents - - 125,000 1,565,000 - - - . �1,690,000 � -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 25,000. � 185,000 � 26U;000
41 124th Ave SECortidor Improvemenffi Phase 3 -
� ' Capital Cosfs - 30,000 150,000 1.000,000 - . - 1,180,000
Funding Sources:
� UnrestridedStreetRevenue - - - - - - . �
GraMS - - 100,000 865,000 - - 965,000
Trafiic Impad Fees - 30,000 50.000 .135,000 :215,000
42 SE 320th Street Corridor ImprovemeMs
Capifel Costs - - 30,000 60,000 580,000 - � 870,000
Funding Sources:
Urirestricted Street Revenue - - - - . _ _
Grents - - - 51,500 502,100 553,600
Traific Impact Feas 30.000 6,500 77,900 . 116,400
�63 Aubum WaySou�B�Riverwalk I�Kerseatlon ImprovamaMS , . . .._..
Capital Costs - - - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400.000
� � Funding Sources . . . . . .
Unrestrided Street Revenue • - - - - _ .
Grdnts - - - 125,000 1.951,000 -. . 2,076,000
Tretfic Impact Fees - 25.000 299,000 324,000
�47 Emironme�l Park Roadway Improvements Study� � �
� CapRal Cosfs ' - - - - 5,000 - � 5,000
. Funding Sources: . .. � �
Unresficted Street Ravenue • - - - 5,000 - 5,000
Grants • - - - - - -
Other - - _
48 DowMown to Les Gove Non-Moto�d ImprovemeMS Study
Capifal Costs 10,000 - • - - - 10,000
Funding Saurces: -
Unrestricted Street Revenue 10,000 - - - - - 10,000
Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - -
24
City ofAuburn Capital Fqcilities Plan
TABLE T-2{eoMinued)
' . 2072 .2013 2014 �Z015 2078� 2017 �Total
.. � �Caoaekv Proieets: - . . - . . .�-- -
49_ S 316th Street BleyGe 8 Pedestrfan Improvement Swdy .
�� �� Capital Costs 5.000 - - - - - 5,000
Funding5ources: �
Unfestric[ed Street Revenue 5,000 - - - - � - 5,000
Grents � . . - ' - - - - .
� Tra�c Impacl Fees � - � .� _ .. _ . ._ - �
51 .East Valley Hiphway ITS Expansion � � � � '
. Capital Costs . - 800,000 - - - - 800,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
G2nts - 692.000 - - - - 692,000
� Tra�c Impact Fees � � �108,000 - � � - 108,000
� 53 37eh Sheet SE&R Street SE Pedasfrian CormeUw
Capital Cosffi 1,000 � - - - - - 1,000
Funding Sources: .
� UnresVicted.Street Revenue 1,000 - - - � - - 7,000
� Grants � - � � - � - - - - •
� � � TraKclmpactFees - � -
54 Keroey Wayfrom White River Bridge.W Southem City.limk � ,. � . �
Capital Costs - � - � - � - - 350,000 350,000
. Funding Sources: - , , � � ,
UnrestriUed Slreet Revenue - � . - - - - -
Grants - . - - - - �25D.000 � 2§0.000
-TraRc Impac[Fees - � � �100,000 100.000
� 58 Au6um Way Soufh Cortidor Impmveme�;Fir ST SE to Hemlodc ST SE ' �
Capital Costs :2.736.700' - - - - - 2.758,700.
Funding Sources:
� Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - � - � - -
Grants 2,189,400 - - - - - 2,189,400
- - �� � Other(MI� 547,300 � 547,3U0
Subtotal.Caoaeltv Pioiecls: � � � . �
Capltal Costa �� 12,948.500 17,051,900 3,N2,000 5,866,500 3.566,100 72,830,700 49,375,700
• TI WF Nontaoaelri Proiects: �
2 Aubum Way South Cortidor ImprovemeMS Phase 1
Capital Costs , 106,500 784.300 �- - - - 890,600 �
� FunCing Souroes: � .
Unrestricted Strcet Revenue 46,500 43,500 � - � - - - 90,000
. ' Grants 60,000 740,800 �- - - - 800,800
TraRc Mitigadon Fees . - �- - - - -
ana. - -
3 Aubum Way Cortidor Improvemerrts , .
. Capital��CwLS _ - � . - - 818,700 3,000,000 3,818,700
Funding Souroes:
Unrestncted Street Revenue . . - - - 110,000 600,000 710,000 �
' � � Grdnts . - - - � - 708,700 2,400,OD0 3,108,700
Other - -
2$
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
7ABLE T-2(eontinued)
2012 2073 � 2014 2015 2018 2017 Total
T�P Non-CaoaelN Proieets: - - - . . . . . .- . - .
7 75th Street SW Reconstrucfion - .
� Capital Costs - - - - 375,000 � 3,000,000 3,375,000
� Funding Sources: - � .
UnresMcted SVeet Revenue - - - - 75,000 500,000 � 575,000'
Grents_ - - - - 300,000 2,500,000�� 2,800,000�
� Other - � - � �
19 Aubum Way NoRh/1 st Street NE Signal Improvemenfs _ .
Capitai Costs - 50,000 SW,000 - - � - 600,000
Funding Sources: � '.
Umestricted Street Revenue - �50,000 125,000 - - , � 175,000
GraMS � - - 425,000 - - - 425,000
aner
:21 C Street NW and West Main 5treet
CapitalCosts - 1�O,ODO t,D00,000 - - - 1,t00,00U
Funding Sources: -
Unreshicted Street Revenue - 20,000 200,000 - - -� 220,000
G2nts� . - 80,000 600,000 - � - �� _ - 880.000�
Other -
25 F Street SE and 4th Street SETreffic Signal -�
Capital Casis 1,000 - - - - � . , - 1,U00
Pund'mg Sources . . ..
Unrestricted Sheet Revenue 1,000 - - - - - 1,000
Grants - - - - - -
Other
27 41st Street SEand A Sheet SE Access Wa�gemeM Study
Capifal Costs 2,000 - - - - � - $000
Funding Sources: - - � -� '
Unrestricted Street Revenue 2,000 - - - - -� 2,000
Grants. - - - - - -
aner_ - _
28 Mnual Bridge Impro4emeM ProJeet
CapitalCosts. . 50,000 50,000 �SO,ODO 50,000 � SO,D00 ' � 50,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
UnresMcted Street Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 .
GraMa - - - - - - • . ._
T�aific Impact Fees - � �
- �29 So.2Tlth.Wetla��M'rtigatlon � - - - -. - _ ._. . .
Capital Costs 25,000 25;000 25,000 - - - 75.000
- Funding Sources: �
� Unrestricted Street Revenue 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000
Grenh - - - -� - - '
' Other . . . .. _ _ . . .
30 CllywWa PedesMan Crossing Program � . � - - - �-�
Capital Costs 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000
Funding Sources: . � � - � �
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - � 300,000
GranLa - - - - - - '
Other " .
26
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2(eontinued)
. 2012 2013 2014 _ 2015 .ZO'I6 2017 - �Total
�NOmCaoaeiriProleets:. . . � . ._ . . .
31 Citywide Blryde b SaTety Improveme�rts�
Capital Cosb. . , 100,000 , 100.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:� � .
Unrestricted Slreet Revenue . 100,000 .. 100,000 100,000 . 100,000 100,000 100,000 B00,000
Granfs . �� . . . - _ . - - � - - - -
� .Other � . . .
38 Railroad Crossing Satety Improvements. , � . . �
' Capifal Cosffi � � � , - - - - 1,200,000 1,800,000 - 3,000,000 �
. Funding Soumes.. � � � � - .
UnresMcted Street Revenue � -. � - - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000
C,renb � - � - - 1,100,000 1,650,000 � - 2.750,000
Other
44 A Street NE Pedestrlan Improvements � . ..
� � Capttal Caats � . - � � -� -� � � 150,000 - - 150,000
Funding Souroes�. � - � -
� � � Unrestricted Streat Revenue - - - - - - -
� Grants -. � � - - t50,000 - - �50.000
Other
45� IrMerurban Trallhead ImprovemeMS .
Cepital Cqsts - - - 21D,000 - - 210,000
FurWing Sourcss: -
Unrestrie[ed Street Revenue - � - - - - - -
Grants . - - - 210,000 - - 270,000
Traftic Mitlgation Fees � � .
46 �104th Ave SE 6 Green River Rnad Study �
Capitel CosLa 3,OD0 - - - - - 3,000
, Funding Sources: � �
Unrastricted Street Revenue 3,000 - - - - - 3,000
Grents - - - - - - •
TratFlc Mitigalion Fees - -
50 RS Dynamic Message Slgns
Capltal Costs - - 220,000 - 220,000 - 440,OD0
Funding Souroes:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 30,000 - 30,000 - 60,000
Grante - - 190,000 - 190.000 - 380,000
TraHlc Mltlgation Fees -
55 Mary Olson Farm ImpmvemeMs
CapitalCosts 1.000 - '� - - - 'I.000
Funding Sources:
Unrastricted Street Revenue 1�.000 - - - - - 1,000
GraMa - - -- - - - -
Other
56 Lea HIII�Pedestrian Improvemenffi �
Capi�il Costs 373;500 - - - - - 373.500
Funding Sources: ,
UnresMcted Streat Revenue - - -� - - - -
Granb 373,500 - - - - - 373,500 � �
Other
SubLOtal.Non-Caoacitv Prolects:
� CapifalGosfs 76$000 1,109.300 2,045,000 1,710,000 3,463,700 6,150,000 75,240.000
2�
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2(continued)
.. . . . 2012 �2073 2014 � 2075 --. 2016 _-_ ._2017'_-:__-._:Total
SUAAMARY: - - ' , . .
CAPRALCOSTS � - . � �
Capeciry Projeds 12,861,200 10,965,OOD 2,905,000 5,660,000 3,360,000 12,625,000 d8,376,200
Non-CapaGtyProjec[s 762,000 1,109,300 2,065,000 1,710;000 �3,463,700 '-''8;150,000 . 15,240,000
" Long-Tertn'Debt - 87,300 86,900 . 207,000 206;500 - 206.100��� � �205,700 �999,500
- TotalCosts 13,710,500 12,161,200 5,157,000 � �7,576,500 '7,0�.800�.. 78,980,700- �84,615,T00 �
FUNDING SOURCES: ' � � � �� � '
� Unrestricted Street Revenue 600,000 288,500 630,000 300,000 � 682.500 � 1,292,500 3,773,500
' GraMS 8,249,400 6,696,300 3,865,000 � 6,301�,SD0 5,769,300� �6,982,500 47,864,000
Traftic Impect Fees '1,482,700 '1,799,900 662,000 975;OD0 598,000 . �-455,700 5,973;300
� Trettic MltlgatlonFees - 150,000 - - ' . - �� � - 750,000 �
- REET2 � 75,000 -� -� . - - � - � 75,000
- PWTFLoan � � - 1,977,100 . . -. . -. _. __ _ . .- 1,97Z,100
Other(OtherAgendes) 3,303,400 1,249,400 .t250,000_�A�,802,800_.
� TotalFunding � 18,770,500 . 72,181,200 5,157,000 -7,578,500 '�7,029,800--- 18,980,700,--"64,815,700�
''Mftfgatlon agreemenfs,imped fees,conMbutions,ofher agencies,other/unds- � . . - �
2g
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capltal Facilities elan
Sbt Year Capifal Facilitles Plan,2012-2017 SpecialRevenue Fund
Projed Ta1e: A Street NW, Phase 1 (3rd St. NW to 14th'St. N1R� TIP # 1
Projed No: c207a0
Projed Type: Capacity
Projea nnanager: Ingrid Gaub LOS Corridor ID#18
Deseriptlon: - - .
Construct a,mutti-lane arterial from 3rd8t. NW to 14th St. NW. 7his.project will improve mobility and,is tied to comdor
deyelopment. R'is consistent wRh the Comprefiensiye Plan and corrtributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor:.
The projed length is approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the northem property owner. If the
property develops,some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City(total cost was$251,000).
Progress Summary:
Pre-design wes completed prio�to 2007: Final design was completed along wAh the environmental process. Construction began
irc2011 and is expected to be completed:in 2012.
Future Impact on Operating BudgM:
The annual maintenance mst for this projed is estimated to be$25,830.
BudgeC � � 20tt � �YTDAetuel 20t2 . ltaudgat
� � � � � Budget Expanditurea Budget Balance, .
� . . . _ . .. AdoPted Bud9et. ... � ' ' ' ' .
6utlgetAmentlmeMS - - -
� AdJusYedBudget ' ' ' '�
AetivltY:
�v��vB> zo��re 2012 Year EnA
. � Funding Sources: � Prlor to Z017 Eatimafe 2012 B 4079 BuE P eet Total
UnresWcted Sheet Revenue � ' 258,962 �• �- 18.500� - � 277,462
GiaMS(Fed.Sfete:LOCeI) 1,235,779 ' 4.588.930 785.000 - 6.607.709
TrelfielmpactFees 191.060 50,000� 6%.OW � - 925,060
Otlrer Sources(Devebper)• 207 560 200 000 407 560
. Total F�mtling Sourees: 1.883,801 0.&10.<90 1,687,500 . - 8,277.791 ,
Capital Expendkurea: "
Design 1.390,404 326:8'19 - - 1.717,223� .
R/ghtWWay 295,397 768,373 - - '1,063,770 '
ConsVUCtlon � - 3 749 298 �1 6B7 500 � �5 436 798 �
7otal F�cpenCkurea: . .. 1.885.801� .:-4.844A90 1,887.500 • �8,277,781
Foreeasted Projad Cost -` .
7otal
2014 '2015� 2016 2017 2012-Z077 .
. . Fundinp Sourees: � . .. ,
� �UnreshictedSheetRevenue . - - - - �8��0
Grerrts(Fed.Stete.Locel) ' _ ' ' 785.000�
7raMc Impact Fees - ' - ' ' 884.000�
OfhBf SWrceS(DevebperJ' ' ZOO OOO
� Total Funding Souices:� � . ' ' ' ' 1.687.SOD .
. . - CaPNaI Et�e�dilures: �
� ' pgsi�7n ' ' ' ' ' .
. RigM b/WaY ' ' ' ' '
. .Conshucfion 1687500 �
. Total.Fxpenditmas: - - ' ' ' ' 1�687,500
Orants/Other Sources: •Otharlunds are MuttlCare half street conMbutfon. � �
29
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capifal Faeilities Pian
Six Year Capitat Faeiiities Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project Title: I Street NE Corridor(45th St NE to S 277th St) TIP# 4
Project No: C415a0
Project Type: Capacity .
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#21
Desqrfptiopc,-_ .
The final alignment of the I Street Corridor is being analyzed as part of the Northeast Aubum Special Area Plari
Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW and Construction will be devetoper funded. The cross secfion will likely
be a 5-lane arterial per the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Progress Summary: -
This project is development driven. The projed has been delayed due to the delay of the nearby pending developrtient.
Puture Impad on Operating Budget: _ .-_` - -
The annual mairt[enance cost for this project is estimated to be$25,200.
Budger ' �o�� rroqeeuai zoiz atBudee�
e�a9� �coe�dnures . . e�a9�s__ _ ____ eaianee___
, � ' � � Adopted Budget - � - - � -
, Budget Amendments - -
AdJusfetl Butlget - - - -
Activity: -
2071 YE 2012�Year.End
_ , FwMing Sourees: Pr1or to Z011 -.Estlmate 2012 Bud 2013 Bud et � . �ToTal .
Un'estrkfed.SYreetRevenue 11,827 - - - � -_ - - 11,827
Grants(Fed.S7ate.locel) - - - � � - . _-
� Traficimped Fees - - - - -
-. OfherSources(Porto/Seaftle) . . - - 409,300 - . 409,300
OMer Sources(Devebpmentl _ .
Total Funding Sourcea: 77.827 - 408.300 - - 421.127
. , CapMai Expendihnes: - � .
Design 10,957 - 150,000 - 160,957
. RightWWay 870 - 259,300 - P60,170
. . .. Consfructlon � .
� Total Expenditures: - 71.827 . 409.�00 - 421,127
Foreeasted Project Cost: ' - -•�
To�l
2014 � 2015 2018� 2017 . � 2072•2017
Funding Sourees. . . - - — --�
UnresMcted SVeet Revenue - - - -
_ Grants(Fetl,State,Locaq - - - � 1,000,000 1.000,000
Tia�e Impaet Fees - - - - -
OMerSou2es�(PorfofSeatlb) - . - , . - 409,300
OMer Sources(Development) - -
Tatal Funding Soumes: -� - _ - 1,000.000 -- —7;109:SD0�
- CapHal�penditures: .
Deslgn - - - � - . 150,000
RightofWey - - - - 259,300
Consbuction � 1,000 000 � 1 00�,000
Total.Expendituras: • - • 1,000,000� _ - - 7,409,300
Grants/Other Sources: 'Developer In klntl funda/services support Mis project but tlo not pass Nrough the city.$409K Is Porl of.Seattle Mitigatian
30
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL' STREET FUND (102) Capka�Fae�lities P�an
Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project Trtle: M Street Grade Separation (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5
Project No: c201a0
Project Type: CapaCity
Project nnanagec Jaco6 Sweeting LOS Corridor ID#6
Description•
Construdion of a grade separated railroad crossing of M St SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks. .
Progress Summary:
100%Design Drawings and right of way acquisition were completed in 2011.Construction is expeded to start in early 2012.
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$21,827.
BUdgEt: . . . 2017 YTDAetual 2012 �118udget
� � � ' ButlBe! �Expentlltures Budget �Belanee
, AdopfedHudget . � -- - - -
� Budget ArimendmeMS. . _ � . .
Adjusted�Budget - . . _ .
Activity:
�. . ' 20N YE� 2072 Year End
�.FUndingSourees: Prlorto2071 EsUmaU�-� 2012Budgel 20196udget ProJectTotal
UnrestdGetl S6eet Revenue . - 150,000 • � - • 150,000
Grents(Fed,S[ete,Locap 419,800 452.580 4,791,500 4,206,500 5,663,880
� REE72 - �� t69,400 970,580� -� - �1,139,980
TralficlmpacfFees(Corrs�uctlon) 2,447,000 - 861,400 1,500,000 3,102,400
Tra9lc lmpea Fees(Debt Servieel - - - - -
. TraAk Mltfgetlon Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000
" PW7FL ' � - 1.500,000 - , - 1,977,100 7,500,000
Other Sourees(Ofher Ageneies)' � 160 200 54 940 2 096 800 7 249 400 2 331 940
- Total FunAing Sources: 3.870,400 3,728,100 7,549,700 � 8,835,000 74,548,200
Caplfal ExpendiNres: .. . ...
Design 2,522.300 51A,000� - - 3,033,300 ,
RigMof.Way 1,348;100 2,251,900� - - 3,600,000
Construction - 365,200 7,549,700 � 8.935,000 7.974,900
-� PWTFL Debt Servlce
Tota16[parMilums: , J.670A00 3.128.700 7.598,700 8.935.000 10.`�'18.200 . .
Forecasted Project Cost:. _. - - __ . .
total
. . 21N4 � �:2075 � 2076 .2077 201Y-2017
. Funding Sourees: . . .
. UnresMCfed Street Revenue � - - - - -
G�arns(Fed.SYete.LocaQ � . ' - - ' 9.000.000
REET2 � ' ' ' ' '
Tralfic fmpacf Fees(ConsVUCtlonJ , - - - - 2,161,400
TraKic Impect Fees(Debt Service) � 120.500 120,500 120,500 120,500 482,000
TiaAe Mltigetion Fees ' ' ' ' '
awrFC - - - - �.sn,�oo
OtherSources(OMerAgencies)' . � � � 3,346,200
Tolel Funding Sourcea: � 120,500 120,500 � 120,400 120,500 76,966,700
Capltel Ftyenditurea: . .
- Design - - -
RigMofWay • . '. ' ' '
- � ConsVUCtion • - - • - 16.464��700
awrF��m sa„��� �2osoo - _ �zo soo �zo soo �zo sao asz,000
TotalE�endlWrea: � � - 120.500 � 120,500 120,500 120,500 �16,966,700 �
GraMS/Ot�er Sources: •Grenb ere Fede21 antl State�(FMSIB secureE,TIB unsecured)funds.Other Agencies include�Port of SeaCle,�Port of .
Tecoma,BNSF,PSE end King Counry.PWTFL hes 30 Year repaymeM schedule. � � � •
31
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capirai Facmves awn
Six Year Capital Facllitles Plan,2012-2D17 Speelal Re4enue Fund
Projea Title: South 277th (Auburn Way North to Green River Bridge) . TIP # 6
ProjectNo: C22280
Project Type: C8p8City
- Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#15
Descrip8on:
This project includes preliminary engineering,design; right of way acquisition and construction of major widening on S.277th
Street, including the addition of three lanes,one westbound and two eastbound,a Class 1 trail,stortn,sewer and water
improvements. The project length is nine-tenths of a mile. The final configuration will include.three lanes eastbound and two
lanes'westbound. '
Progress;Summary:
TFie majorfty of this roadway is cunenUy in the City of KenPs jurisdiction. Because tfie property served from the:roadway is in
the City of Autium,the plan is to annex this portion of ttie roadway ftom Kent into the City of Aubum. The majority of this
project is eupeoted to be completed by adjacent developments: -
. ., Futureimpact on Operating Budget:
The annual mafntenance costs for this project is estimated to be$27,250.
Buagetc zo,o rro newai zo„ to s„e�
� e�aget Fapeea�mres e�aget satanee
_ Adopted8udget - ,- ' � - -�
�ButlgetAmentlmerrts
AdJusted Budget . � - -� � -� -
Activity:
2011 YE 2072 Year End
� FurMi�Soureas: Prior to Z017 EsNmate 2012 Bud �2013 Bud .Pro'eet Tdal.
Unresbicted SVaet Revenue � 19,085 - - - 19,085 �
Grents(Eed.Slate.Loca1) ' - ' - - '
� � - Trslfic Impect Fees - - - ' -
Other(DevebpmentFrinds)' - � -� - - -� ,
Other
Total Funding Soureea: 79,085 • � - • 19,085
Capkel Expandifures: �
Design 18.510 - - � - 18,510
� RigM o1 Wey 575 - - - ' S75 �
ConsWehon ' ' ' . . _'.�__ ___ ___'.
Total Expanditures: 19.085 - - . - - . - .. 19,085
Foreeas�d Project Cost:
Total
2014 .2075 2018 2017 2012-2077 �
Funding Soureea:
� Unrestn'�Xed Street Revenue • ' '� �. . _
Grants(Fed,SYate,local) - - - 2,000,000 2.OD0,000
Trslficlmped�Fees - - - - -
, Other(Devebpment Funds)' - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sourcas: - �- • 2,000,000 $000.000
Capital ExpendlWres: - �
Design - - - 250,000' 250,000
RigMafWey - - • 250,000� '250,000 �
Construetion 1 500 000 . 1 500 000
� Total EspendHures: - �- - 2,000�000 . Z.000�000
Grar�!Other Sourcas: - � -
32
City ofAuburn Cgpital Fgcilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facflifies elan
Siz Yea►Capital.FacilRfes Plan,2012-2017 Speefal Revenue Fued
Project Tine: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main to 3M St NV1Q TIP # 8
ProjectNa Cp7000[
Project Type: CapaCity
eroject Manager. . TBD LOS Corridor ID#18
Deseription:
Construct a multi-lane arterial from W Main to 3rd St NW: This projed,will connect A St NW, Phase 1 to the Sound iransit
Station'and the CeMralBusinessDistrict. This proje_ctmay end up being funded all or in part by developers.The project
length is onefifth of a mile.
Progress Summary:
The parking garege constructed by the Aubum Regfonal Medical Genter completed a portion of this projed in 2009. Design is
anticipated to begin in 2010.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This projed will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: 2wt - vmaeeuai zotz tt sucges
• . . . � Budget Ezpendlturos � Budget .Balanrs
� AdoptedButlget '. ' ' . '
' BudgetAmend-menfs - -
Adjusted Budget ,.. � . • ' '
AClIVILy: .
2017 YE 2072 Year End -�
Funding Sourees: Prior to 2077 Estlmaoe 2012 Bud 2013 Bud et aet Toml
� ' Unrestricted Street Revenue . - ' �- - � ` ' -
Grants(Fed,SYate�locaq . . - - - '. '
REET - ' - . - '
TreRc Imped Fees_ - -� - - •
� Other(Developer)• - - ' •
Total FunAing 3ourees: � ' ' ' . ' '�
Capital Erzpenditures:
pesi� ' - ' ' ' '
Righfo/Wey - - - - -
Conshuctlon '
Total Expsnditurea: - ... .. -
Foreeasted Project Cost:
. . . . . . . Total
2014 2D'IS� 2078 2077 2012•2017
Funding Sourees:
� UnrestriGed Street Revenue - � ' ' ' ' '
GreMS(Fed,SYete,locaq - - -� 3,000,000 ' 3.OD0,000
REET � - - - � - -
Tralfic Impad Fees � - -� - - -
OMer(DevefoPad� - - - - -
� Totalfundfng Souroes: - - - _ . 3,000,000 3.000,000
Capifal Ezpenditures: . .
. Design � - . - - - �250.000� 250,000
RiphtolWey - ' - - 250,000 250,000
ConsWCfion 2 500 000 �2 500 000
Total Expenditures: • - • 3,000,000 3.000,000
Granfs/Olher Sources: Grant tunding shoxm�is unsecured. 150K Developer in kind fundslservices support thisprojea but do not pass ttrough�
�Y .
33
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) •. . captta�Fauunes P�an
Sfx Year Capital Faoilkies Plan;2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project 7itle: D Street NW(37th St NW to 44th St NVI� TIP # 9
Project No: Cp)OOa
Projed T.ype: Capacity
Pioject Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#20
Deseription: _
Construct a four-lane arterial per the dty Comprehensive Plan. It will improve northlsouth mobiiiiy. This projed is tied to
potential future development and will complete a major north/south arterial cortidor fiom Ellingson Road.SW(41 st Street SE)
to S.277th St.The D St NW project leng[h is approximately 0.42 miles.
Progress"Summary:
Future Impact on Operatlng Budget:
The annual maintenance cost forthis projed is estimated to be$11,450.
-
� BUd96t:., 2077 YTD Aetual 2011 � 11�.BuEget
Budget F�cpandRures Butlget� � Balanee
. Adopted Budget - � - ' � -
. Budget AmerMments � �
AdjusYed Budget . _ _ _ � . . . -
ACZiVity:
� 2071 YE . . � - ZD72 Year ErW
Funding Sourees: Prior to Z011 Estlmats 2072 Butl et 2013 Bud et. Pro et Total �
� Unrestrided Sfreet Revenue - � - � - � - - � . - ._ ..
GraMS(FedState:Local) - - - - - �
' - REET - - - ' , -
- � TreRle Impeet Fees - - - - '-
Otber
Totel Funtling Soureo8: ' ' ' . ' .
Capitai Expe�MiOrtes: �
pesiy^ - _ - . - _
. ' . RightolWay ' ' � ' ' - '
ConsWC6on - " �" -
. , ToSel ExpendlWrea: - • - .. .. .. . . -
Forecasted Project Cost:
. . . .. . . Tolal
2014 2015 2018 2017� _ 2072-2017
Funding Sourcea: - � - ...-— -- -- -�- -. .
Unresbicfed Shaef Revenue - - - - -
Grarrts(Fed.Slata.LOeaQ - - - 250,000 250,000
REET - ' - -
. . Traftk Impect Fees ' - ' S0,000 .50.000
ONer
Total Funding Sources: - - - 3G0,000 - 300,000�
Capital ExpenAitures: � •
Design - - - 300.000 300,OOU
Right o(Way - - - - -
Cons6vctlon.
Total Expe�Mitures: ' ' - ��3DO.ODO � 30Q000
Grants I Other Sowoas:. Gra�rt Funding shown:is unseeured. . �
34
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) cap�tai Faeilities P�en
Six Year Capifal Fadlities Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
• Projed,Title: F Street SE(4ffi St SE to Auburn Way S) TIP # '10
Project No: cp0911
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager.' TBD
Description:
The F St SE project includes pavement reinnsWCtion,installation of curbs,9utters,an&foot.wide sidewalk on both sfdes,
parking on one side,and a center tum-lane,as w_ell as crash attenuation at the supports for fhe BNSF railroad bridge. This
projeG improves mobiliry and safety along tFSe corridor:The projed length is approximately 0.3 miles.
Progress Summary:
Preliminary design and survey work was�mpleted in 2009. Final design and construdion are planned to be completed
following wnstrudion of the M Street grade separation projed.
Future Impaet on OperaHng Budget
The annua(maintenance costfor this project is estimated to be$41 D0.
BUdget: . . 20N�. - YTDActual. 2012 7ti8udget
� - . Budget F�cpendkurea Budget Balanee
� . Adopfed Budget - ' - '
Budpet AmerWments - -
- � AdJustedBudget "- �- - - -
a�tlYlty:
� 2011 YE 2012 Year EnA
Funding Soureas:� Prfor to 2011 Estimate 2072 B 2019 Bu Pro' Total
Uniestricfetl Sfreet Revenue - - " - '
Grants(Fed,State.Loea9 - - � ' - -
RfET - - - - '
TraR'ic Impect Fees 7,620 - - - -
Ofher
� ' Total Funding Sources: � � 7,620 .` - - - • -
Capifal F�cpendkurea: � .
� Design 7,620 ' . - - .7,820
Ri9hto/WBY ' ' .' � ._ '
CortstrucUon �
Totel F_x�iemlMuras: � 7.620 - • ' � - � 7��0
Foreeasted Project Cost:
- . Total
Y014 T075 2078 2017 2012-2017
FundingSou�ees:� ' �
Umes6ieted SYreet Revenua - - - -- -
GrarMS(Fed,Shate,LOeap 200,000 2.0OO,ODO - - 2200.000�
REET � ' ' ' ' '
Tra/fic Impad Fees . . 50,000 250,000 . - - �300,000
OMer
� Total Funding Sourcas:� � . 250,000 2,250,000 - � - Z,500,000
Capital Expendkuras:
� Desfgn 250,000 - - 250,000
RightolWey - - '75.000 - - 75,000
Conswaion 2 175'000 2 175 000
. .Tetal ExpanAltures: ' 250�000� 2,250.000 � - - 2�500�000
Grarns/OUier Sources: �Grafrt Nnd"mg is unseared. - - � � � --
35
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) caA;ra�Fac�i�e�es:P�ao
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Tine: M Street NE(E Main St to 4th St NE) ?IP # 11
Project No: cpi000c
Projec[Type: CdpaCity ,
Projea Manager. TBD LOS CorHdor I�5
Deseriptlon:
This project will construG a complete 4 lane street sedion on M StNE between south of E Main St antl 4th St NE:
Progress Summary:
Pre-design wilf be done in 2013 to refine project scope,alignment,and cost.
Future Impaet on Opereting Budget:
The annual maintenance cost for this projed is estimated to be$1,500.
Budget: 20�� rroaceusi zot2 i� sudgee
sua9e� Expenanures -sudget ' eaienee
Adopted Budget - • . .- -
Budget Amendments �
Adjusted Budgef ' ' ' � � '
Activil�r:
2011 YE 2012 Year ErM. �
Funding Souroes: Prior to 20�1 Estimate 2012 Bud 2014 Bud .Pro - TMaI.
�Unrastricfetl S6eet Revenue - _ - - �- - -_- - - � '
GreMS(Fed,SYete,LOeaq - ' - -. .
� REET - • - - - �
T2fic Impect Fees - - - 50,000 ' -
OMer
� �Total Funding Sources: - �- -- � 50,000 -
Capital Expendkurea:.� . , '
Deslgo- - - ' S0,000 ' '
Right o/Way - - _ _
Conshucfion � '
TolalExpendib+res:�. ' ' • � 50.000�:. . ..
Foreeasted Pmjed Cost: -
• Tofal
, � 2014 � 2075 �2016 2017 � 2072-2017.
Fu�Wi'g3ourcea: � . . — -
Unreshicted Sheet Revenue - _ _ . . _
Gtarrts(Fed,SYate,LoeelJ 225,000 1,OD0,000 - - 1,225,000 �
REET - ' ' - -
Tralfic Impecf Fees 50,000 150,000 - - . 250,000 �
Other
Total Funding Soureese. 275,000 1,150,000 • - � - - � 1,475,000
, � Capltal Expenditures: . . '
Design 75,000 - - �- . 125,000
RightMWey 200,000 - • - 200,000
� ConsWcNOn 1 150 000 . 7 150 000 .
. . ToW Expenditurea: 2T5,000 1,150.000 - � - ].475,000
Granis/Other Souroes: Grarrt tunding is unsewred: � - , • -
36
City of Auburn Capita!Facilitie"s Plan
ARTERIAL$TREETFUND (702) � . ` Cap�tafFac�ut�esPlaq
� Sfx Year Capital Facftitles Ptan,2012-2017 Spedal Revenue Fund
Projed Ta1e: West Valley Hwy Improvements(SR-18 to West Main Street) TIP# 14
Project No: tp0916 �
Pro)ect Type: Capaeity
Project Manager. Jaeob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID#35
Deseription: . . .. .. . .
� This project will widen the roadway to accommodate an extension of the two way left tum.lane,add curb 8�gutter,stortn drainaga,
repair failing roadway surface;install sidewalk on one side ofthe roadway; install dry standard`street Ilghting, Impro4e bicycle
accommoiiations,and install a new traffic signal'at the intersection of West Main Street and West Valley Highway. This project will
improve the capacity,safety,and driving comfort of the corridor as well as reduce the amount of time maintenance staff spends doing
temporary repairs.
Progress Summary:
Design started in 2010 and mnstruction is planned foc2011.
� . Future Impact on Operating Budget: -
This project will have no impad on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: �ott rroaema� 2otz �tsua�
s�aa�e �d�wre. s�aee� e�eo�
. Aypptetl guypet -. - . � . _ .
Budget Amerio'mente -
. , AdjustadBudpet . • - - .-
ActiVity: � � . ..
�(Pmvloun Vn) 2077 YE 2072 Yoor End
Funtling Sourees: Prlor to 2077� EstlmaOe_ 2072 Bud Z013Bud Pro act ToW �
. Unrestrkterl Sneet Revenue - .58,730 5,000 - -
Grants(Fed.SYete.LOCaIJ 139,728 , 2,210,920 ' ., ' ' .
� REET 2 53.302 41.680 ' '
Tia((ic Mitigafnon Fees . 75.00D ' ' ' '
TreK'c Impect Fees . 25 000 530 000 � -
Toml FurMing Souroes: 293,028 2,847,330 5,000 - - -
� Capital F�endHUres: . ..
Deslgn 293.028 339,880 - - 632.708
RightdWey • 5,580 - - 5,580
Consbucfion ..2 496 070 .S 000 � .2 501 070
TetalE�endNures: � 293.028 2,841.330- � -- 5,000 . 5,739,358
� � Forecasted ProJect Cost: . , ., . '
Totaf
� 2074 2U75 � .2D18 2077 . 2072-2077 .
FurMing Sourma: � � .. . . .
Unresfdcfed Sheef Revenua - - � - - �5,000
� . Grants(Fetl,Stefe.LOCa!) . . ' . "� ' ' : '
REET2 � . ' . r ' ' '
Tralllc Mlfigelion Fees. ' ' , ' ' '
, TiaMC Impact Fees - - �
� Tofal Funtling Sources: � ' ' ' ' S,000
CapkalE�amliWras: . . . � .
�peygn . . ' - ' ' ' '
RqhtofWaY � . ' '. . . ' ' . '
Constnx.tion ' .5 000
. Total EYpan�turea: - . - . . 5,000
GreMe/Other Sourcas: TIB GraM(seGreC). - - -�- . .
37
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) cap�ea�'Fac��mes P�an
Six Year Capital FacilRies PWn,2�12-2017 SpeciafRevenue.Fund
Project Title: Bth Sfreet NE wdening (Pike St to R St NE) TIP # 15
Project No: cp7000c
ProjectJype: Capacity �
Project Manager: TBD LOS GorridorJD# 19
Description: - --
Add eastbound lane to Southside of 8th SLNE. Currently the lane exists from M St NEand dropsas a right tum onty lane at
the intersection of Bth St NE and PikeSt. This would ex[end the lane to R StNE where it would then be a right tum only lane
onto R St NE southbound. .This is a planning level cost estimate.
, �
Progress Summary: - - -. -
FuWre Imqaefon OperaUng Budget:
This projec[will haye no impad on the opera6ng budget for street maintenance.
BUdgBt: . .. . 2071 YTD Aelual 2012 11 Budgef
- Budgat _ ExpendlNres Budget Balance
� Adopted Budget - - - � -
Budget Amendments � �
.. � Ad/ustad Budget ' ' ' - ____
, AetiWty:
- . 2077 YE � 2012 Year End
• Funding Sources: Pr1or to 2011 EsUmate 2012 Bud et 2013 Bu Pro ed TWSI
Unreshicted�SbaetRevenue - � - - - - -
Gisnfs(Fed,State.LncaQ ' ' - - . -
R� - - -
- Tra/fic ImpaG Fees - - - - -
OMer
. Total Funtlirg Sourees: - - - - . .
� Capltal F�cpendiN,es: . � .
.Design ' _ ' . . . ' _
RightofWBY ' ' ' . ' . . -
� ConsWCtion � � .
, 7otal Expendit�rea: � - - • - " - -
Forecasted Project Cost:
. _ . .` � Total �. ..
� 2014 2075 2018. 2017�__ _ ..2012-2077_
Funding Sources: � �- - �
Unrastncted Sbeet Revenue - - - - �
. � Gran4t(Fetl,State,Ldcel) 360,000 800,000 - . - 1,160,000 �
R�T ' - - - -
r,�rrc i,�,�a r-�s so.000 200,000 - zso,oao
' OIhBf
�� Total Punding Sources: 450,000 7,000.000 - - - 1�550,000
CapNal E�mdiLires: � .
. � Design 200,000 - - - 200,000�
RigMO/Way 250,000 - - � - " � 250,000 -
. ConsVUCtlon 1000-000 � 1,000000
� � � TotalExpenditures: 450,000 7,000,000 • - 1,450,000� �
� � �Grants/OMerSources: Grant funding is unsecured. - . �
38
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) • cap�ta�Faemtte"s e�an
Slz Year Capifal FaeiliUes Plan,2012 2017 - Speetal Revenue Fund
Pro�ea Tiue: Harvey Road &8th Street NE Intersection Improvements TIP # 17
Projed No: Cp0611
Projed Type: C8p3City �� .
Project Manager. Jacob SweeUng LOS Corridor ID#5,19
DescripUon:
Add one eastbound through/right tum lane on 8th St NE approaching Harvey Rd. Modify fraffic signals and traffic
channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additionat lane will improve Vaffic delays and vehide queuing at the
intersedion of Harvey Rtl and8tli SI NE in all directions. This project will reconstrud M St NE from 4th StNEto 8th St NE;a
segmerrt of roadway approximately 0.3 miles in length,with four travel lanes. Tbe reconstruction will fix the ebsting poor
pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the sidewalk network.
Progress Summary: '
ProjeG was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for PWTFL debt payments.
Future Impact on Operatlng Budgei - � - .
This project will have no Impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: � - .. . YoiT YTD Aetual 2ot2 tt Budpef
Budget Expenditurea � BuOget 8alanee
. Adopted Budget . - - ' '
Budget Amendments ' �
. ... Ad/usted&rtlget - - -
AcUVky:
2017 YE 2012 Y�r End
Funtling Sourcea: Prim W 2011 Fstimate 2012 Bud et 2073 Bud et Pro et Total
Unrestncfetl Street Revenue ' - - � - - . - -
GraMS(FedSfate.LoealJ - ' - - � _ - '
� TraHk Impact Fees(Debf Service) 87,100 87,700 67,300 � � 86,900 262,100
TralSc Impect Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500
PYl?F 1 527 300 7 527 300
Total Fundinp Sources: 1,878,900 �87.70D -87,300 86,90D 1,999,800
. Capital Ezpenditures:
Design 285.000 - ' ' .285.000
Righf d Way 196,500 - . - 196,500
Consbuctbn 1,250,300 - ' ' 7,250.300
Long Term Debt-PWiF � 87100 87.700 87 300 88 B00 .262 100 .
Totat F�pe'Wituros: 1,818,900 87.700 67.800 86.900 7.995.900
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
Total
2014 ZO75 2076 2017 2012-2017
FuMi�Sourees: -�
UnreNricted SYreet Revenue ' ' ' ' '
Gra�rts(Fed,SYate.LOCa/) ' '. ' ' '
Tralfro Impect Fees(Debt Service) 86,500 88,000 85,600 85,200 517,500
T�Ilic Impect Fees - -� - - - -
PWTF
- Total Furqling Soureas: B6,S00 8&�0 85,600 83,200 517,500
Capital Expenditurea:
Des19n ' - , - '
Right W Way • • - - -
Conshucfion - - � - -
Lorg Term�Debt-PWTF .. B6 500 88 000 85,600 85 200 517 500
Total Espendkures: � 86,500 `86,000 85,600 ' 85.200 517,500
G2nts/Other Seurces: PWTFLhas�a 20,year tertn ending in 2028. � �
39
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap�te� Facmnes a�an
Six Year Capltal Faeilfties Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project ritie: 8th Street NE and SE 104th St Irrtersection Improvements TIP# 18
Project No: CP1104
Project Type: Irrtersection Improvement, Capacity
Project Manager: Robert Lee LOS Corridor ID#19
Description:
This project inGudes the design, right of way acquisistion and construdion of intersedion improvements tF1at will either
oonsist of either a traffic signal with easbound u-tum capacity or a roundabouYdesign.
Progress Summary: •
The design began in 2011 with construction scheduled for 2012.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: — -
TFie annual maintenande cost for thisprojed is estimated to be$6,600.
BUdget: 2077 YTDAetual 201]. � 11,Budget
-.. - . Butlget Expendkurea .�.Budgai_. .._ .. Balanee. �
Adopted Budget - - - - - - - -_
Butlget AmerMments �
- Ad/usted Butlget - - _ -:
Activityi __
2011 YE 2G12 Year Entl
� Funding Sourees: Prior to 2071 Estimate 2D12 Bud at' 2013 Bud ot Pro eet Totel
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 157.000 • -
� . � 'GraMS(FederelJ - 50,000 50.000 -
` REE72 - - 75.000 - 75,000
Tra1RC Impact Fees - - - - -
�Other(RedllexJ� - 50 000 50 000
Total Funding Soureos: - W,000 332,000 - 7Z5,OOp
Capital E�qwndkurea:
Design - 30,000 - - 30,000
Rlghto7Wey - 20,000 - - 20,000
. _ . Cwsbucfion 332 000 -332 000.
� Total E�qrandMu�es: - SO.00D 337.OU0 - - - --382.000
Foreeasted Project Cost:
Total
� . 2014 2015 2016 2017 2012�,2017
Funding Sourees: - - �
UnrestriGed SYreet Revenue - - - - 157,000 ��
Grants(FederaQ - - - - SO,U00 '�
R�� - - - � - 75,000. '
Treifie Impact Fees - - - _ ._
OUrer(RedRex) 50 000
' Totel Fundinp Sources:. - - ' • 9�,000� '�
Capltal ExpenCitures:
Design - - _ . _ .
RlghtolWay - - - _ ' .
ConsWd7on 332 000' �
Tofal Expenditures:� - - . • S32A00�� �
Grants-/OMer Sourees: �Fetleral Discretlonary grant is secured.. � - .
40
City ofAubum Capital FacilitiesPlan
ARTERIAL:STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities P�an
Six'Year Capifal Faefikies Plan,Z012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTiUe: Aubum Way$outh and M StreetSE Intersection Imp. TIP # :20
Project No: CpX7aX
Projea Type: Capacity � . �
Pmjed Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#3,4
Deseription: '
ConsVuct a westbound to northbound right tum pocket at the intersection of Aubum Way 5and.M St SE. This projed would
alsoimprove the tuming radius at this same comer allowing drivers to make a safe right tum on red(after stopping and .
yielding to onwming vehicles). Currently the intersection geometry has necessitated the City placing a legal restridion on
this movement
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is anticipated to begin in 2011 wRh final design to be completed in 2012. Constrqction will be completed when
funding is secured.
Future Impaet on Operetlng Budgetc
This project will have no impaot on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: 2ot� rrnaauai 2o�z �t sudeet
' ' Budget Expenditurea Budget Balanea
AdoA�ed Budget - - - � -
' Budget AmerMments
AdjusredBudget -� - - . _ . . ._
ACtlVity:
. . .. 2U77YE �20�2YearEnd �
Funding Sourees: � Priorto 20N .Eslimate 20�2 Bud et� 20�3 Bud et Pro TMaI '
Unrestrlcted SVeet Revenue - � 25,000 75,000 - -
GreMs(Fed,State,Loce!). . - - . 850,000 - .
REET - - - � - �-
TrefRc Mltlgatlon Funds �- � - � - 150,000 -
� OMer '
Total Funding Sources: - 25,000 75,000 7,000,000 , -
Capital Expeodltures:
Deslgn - 25.000 75.000 - - �
� � � RlghtWWay - - - ' . 200,000 -
� ConStNdion � B00 000
� � Total Expandlturas: - � - - � 25,000 • 75,000 � 7,000,000 100,000 .
Forecasted Projed Cost:
roea�
� � 2074 2013� 2018 � � .2017 2012,2017
Funding Sourees: � ,
� UnresMctetl Sfreet Revenue� - - - - 75,000
Grsrrts{Fed,Stete,Loca!) - - - - .850,000
�r ' • - -
- - .TraRx MIllpallon Funds ' - - - � . - 150,000
Other
- Totel Fundfng Sourees: - - - - 7,075,000
Capifal E�endilures:
� � � Deslgn - - - - 75,000
, Righf ol Wey - � - � - - - 200,000 ,
Constructlon - 800 000
. Tofal Expendilures:. - _ . , . . - • 1.075.000
Grants I Other Sourcas: Grant funding is unsewred. .
41
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capitei Faci�ities P�an
- Six Year Capifal Faeil'dies Plan,2012-2017 , SpecialRevenue Fund
. Project Ti�e: BNSF/E. Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass TIP-# 23
Projed Nor c229a0
Project Type: Class 1 Trail (Capacity)
Project Manager. TBD
Description: _ .
Project to construct an undercrossing of fhe BNSF Railroad in conjunction with a pedestrian bridge to allow a safe;dired, ;
attracUve nommotorized access between neighborhoods in the City of Paafic and schools in the City of Aubum.
' Progress Summary: ,
The design is ort hold. Funding source is most likely a federal earmark. Currently this project is on hold pending some
discussions with BNSF RR. They are in the process of planning for a third reil which would significantly impact the design. '
Future Impae!on Operating Budgek _ _ _
The annual maintenance cost for this projed is estimated to be$240.
BUdgBl: .. 2071 YTDAetual _ 20�2 .� NBudgeY
Budget Expendltures Budgat Belanee .
.. � � AdoptedBudget • � - -� �-
' , � - BudgBt AmendmerRS - �
, � Adjusted Budget - - - _ ' . -
ACf1Vlt�l: .
� . � 2011 YE -2072 Xaar End
. . � � Funding Sources: Pdorto 2017 EaGmats 2012 Bu 2073�Bud et. 'Pro.. --Total
. � � UnresMCtetl Street Revenue 53,900� � ' . ' . � '� . . , �53.900
� � � Grants(FeC,Sfate,LOCe!) 170,400 - ' - - - 170;400
. �� • ' ' . - . -
� � � - TraKic Impecf Fees � . -.
OMer
' . Total.FUnding8ou'ees: 2?R,S00 - . - . . .- � 224.300� .
. . ,Capital Expsntlitures: -
Deslgn .224,300 - - � - 224,300 .
� � RightofWay ' - ' - - - �-.
' Conshuction �
� � Tofel Expandituras: 124,300 - - - - 224,]Op � .
Forecasted Project Cost: .
. . . � ..TOfal
2014 ZO15 2078 � 207� � 2GS-2077'
� PunNng.Sou�ees:
� Unres6fcted Street Revenrre - - '
� . Grants(Fed,State,Locel) - ' - _ 4,550,000 , 4,550,000 �
REET ' - • � - -
Traffic Impacf Fees - - � �
Ofher,(OfherAgencies)' ' 250.000 250000 ,
' SotalFumm�gSourees: - - �- �_4,800.000 . .4,800.000 ��
. . .. . �Capltal ExpandHures: .. . .
� Design - - - 750,000� 750.000 �
� Rght o/Way - - - � �� 50,000.- . 50.000
Canstructlon . 4 000 000 � 4 000 000
ro�i��nanures: - • - a,soo,000 a,aoo,aoo
GraMS/Other Souroes: , 7KC Open SpaceBond�and High Speetl Rail Satery.Money. -.
42
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET"FUND (102) - Capitaf Fecii�t�es Plen
Shc Year Capital FacfllUes Plan,2012-2017_ _ Special Revenue Fund
Project riue: Academy D�ive Muttf-Use Trail TIP# 24
Projed No: Cp7000c
Project Type: Class 1 Trail,(Capacity)
projed Manager. TBD
Deserlption: .
This projed will use existing rightof-way to repair the damaged roadbed to a usable muRi-use trail on Academy Dr from the
Green Rive�Rd to Aubum Way S.
Progress Summary:
Future7mpaet on Operattng Budget: .
The annual maintenance cost for this projed is estimated ro be$1,680.
Budget: xo» vroawa�ai zo�2 i�eua9e�
e�e�e. �a� e�ag�e eei�� .
Adopted 8udget =— - � - - - -
Budget AmerMme�rts.
. . . Adlusted Budget ' - - - -
ActlVit�l: '
zo��re 2072 Year EnA
� Funding Sources: ' Prior to 20N. Estimate T012 B et 2073 Bud et Pro eet TWa�
� � Unres6icfed Slreet Revenue - � � - - • - -
Greins(Fed:Stete.LOCeI) . - '� � - . - -
� R� � - - - - - -
TralNClmpectFees . • - - - -
Other Scurces
Total Funding$ources: � - • - - -
CaPkal Ezpendituras:
� DaslSn - -� - - -
Righto(Way � - - - . - -
Constructlon
Total Fxpendkurea: � ' ' ' ' '
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
. . .. _. . �. . . Total
� 2014 2015 2016� . 2017 2012-2017.
FurMing Sourees: . . . .. . . .
� Unresbicted Street Ravenue - 50,000 42,500 42.500 135,000
Grarrts fFed.Sfate,Locel)� , - �-� 382,500 ,362,500 765,000
REET ' ' � ' '
Trsffic Impact Fees - - - - -
Otlrer�Sourties� �
Total Fumli�Sources: • - -" 50,000�- " -�425,000 4Z5,000 90Q000
. Capka�EzpentllWres: ,
� Design - 50,000 • - 50,000
RIgMO(WaY , - -� - � - -
Constructlon 425 000 425 000 850000
Total E7�eMlturas: • ' �50,000 �425,000 625,000 900,000
Granta7,Other Sources: � Grant Funding is unsecured. - � - � .
43
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) :' Capite�Faciiides r+�an
Sbc Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Titlei 124th Ave SE Corridor ImprovemeMs Phase 3 TIP # 39
Projed No: Cpx�oO[ '
Projed Type: C2p2City
Projed Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#23;25
DescrlpUon:. .
This projed will fund the design,nght of way�acquisRion,and conshuction of improvemer�ts to the signalized interseclion of SE�320th�Sl.
_
� and124th AveBE. Improvements�includa constructing bike lenes,�sidewalks,dual southbound laft tum lanes inW GRCC;and ITS.A '
portion of this project is the main entrance to Green Riyer Community College and will requlre addiUonal on-site improvements by
GRCC.
, _. _ ,_
Progress Summary: -
Futurelmpact on Operating Budger ..
. : .. This projed will have no impad on the operating budget for sfreet�maintenance. . . . . � - �
eadgec: zo„ v,vxa� zo,z „e�a� .
eud� �anures a�c�i eaianw
� � Adopted Budget - - - . � -
�. . Budget Amendmerrts �
' Adjusted Budget ' ' ' - ._ ._ __-_
ACtIVIty:
� . 2011 YE 2012 Year End
FunNng Sources: Prlor.to 201� Estlmete 2012 B et 2073 Bud � eet Total
� Unreshiefad Street Revenue - - � - � - � -
' Grants(Fed,Sfete.LocaQ - - . - . - -
TreRle Impeet Fees - - � - - - -
Other
, Total�Funding3ources: • - - . � -
� Cepital�Expentliiurea: . � .
� � Design _ . - . - , _ .
Rlght of WaY ' ' ' . ' '
ConsVuction
- Totel Expandiluies: ' ' � ' . . . . _ .
Foreeasted ProJeet Cost — — - _-
7otal
, 2014 2075 2078� 2017 . � ._ 2012-2017
FunNng Sourees: - . -
UnresWcted Sheef Revenue - • - - .
Granls(Fed,SYete,LocalJ - - 85,000 650,000 735,�0
TreH1c Impect Fees - - �15.000 � 700,000 N5,000
Other
Total Funding Sources: - • 100,000 750,000 850,000
CapMal Expenditurea: .
�S� - - -
Right ol Way - - &5;000 50,OD0 135.OU0 �
- ConsWdion 15 000 �700 000 715 000
Total Expendkures: • - 100,000 750,000 - BSO,ODO
Grents/Other Sources: GreM Funding is unsewred. � _ �
44
City oJAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) - ` Cap'itai Fae��Kies P�an
Soc Year Capifal FacilRies Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fdnd
Projeot 7ine: 124th Ave SE Corridor ImprovemeMs.Phase 1 . TIP #` 40
Project No: Cp7000t
Projed Type: Capecity -
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor IQ#23
Description:
This project will fund the design,rigM of way acquisition,�and construdion of.a 41ane section with bicyGe and pedestrian�fadlities on
124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312M St.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is planned for 2013.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: . .
Thisprojed will have no�.impact on the operating budget for strcet maintenance. � •
Budget: 20�� vroaeeuai mu �rBuaaec
e�dg� �vo�an� e�de�e soie��
Adopfed Budget � . � - - -
Budget Amendments -
� Ad/usted.9utlget - - - -
Aetivity:
2071 YE 2072 Year End
Funding Soureea:� Prim M 2077 ..Fstimate 2072 Bud - t.. 2013 Bud � Pro eet Tofal�
Uniestdcted.S6eefRevenue � � • - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Local) - - - 125,000 -
TraRC�lmpac[Fees - - 50,000 25,000 50,000
Ofher
Total Funding Sourees: - - - 50,000 150,000 50,000 �
Capifal EzpendLLurea: .
Design . - - .50,000 150,000 50,000
RigMWWeY ' ' ' ' _
ConsbueNOn
� Totat E7tpe�MltureB: . • - 50.000 150�000 � 50,000
FOf2C85�I PfOj@Gt COSt: � -
TMaI
.2014 2015 2078 201T � 2012-2017
� Fundirg Sourees: - . � .
� Unreshfcted.S6aetRevenue - - � - - -
Granfs�Fed.Slete.LotelJ � 1.SB5.00U - - ' 1.690.000
TreiRelmpeGFeas , , 185,000 - - . - 260,000
OMer
Total Fundirg Sourees: . ' , 7.750,U00 - - . . 9,950.OUD
Capital F�cpendiWres: . ,
.Design • . - _ - � - 200,000
. RigM ol Way , � 250,000 - . .- - 250,000
ConsWeHOn . 1 500 000 1 500 000
Total ExpendlWres: � � 1,750,000 � • - - . 1,950,000
- Grants I Other Souroes: G2m funding la unsecured.. � � . - . . .
45
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) . Capita�Fadnt�es P�an
Six Year Capltal.Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Spedal Revenue Fund
Project Tide: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 TIP # 41
Project No: Cplooa
Project Type: COpaCity
Rruject Manager. TBD LOS Corcidor ID#'19, 23
Descrfption:
This�projed will fund the design, right of way acquisitlon,and consuuciion of improvements to the signalized iMersection of SE 312th St
and 124tl�Aye SE.,ImproyementsinGude adding�bike lanes,dual wesC�ound left Wm lanes,dual southbountl thru lar(es,northbounC
rigM tum podcet,'ITS and pedeshian safety improvements.
Progress Summary:
Pre-design is scheduled for 20'13.
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
This project wilF have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. � .
Budget: 20�� rronon,ai 2ou �� eud¢es
e�d�e ��aim�8 e�ea� ae�,�
� Adopted Budget -�� � - - �-��-- �--
� . BudgetAmendmeMs
Adjusted Budget - - - � -
Adivity: '
� 2017 YE 2012 Year End�
� Funding Sources: PAocto 20N. Estlmate 2012 Bud et. � 2D13 Bud et._ __Pro eet Totsl..
Unres6iUetl Sheef Revenue - - - � " - � - " -
Giairts(Fed.State,Loceq - - - - -
Tralife Imped Fees - - - 30,000 � -
Otlrer
- � Total Funding Sourcas: • - - " 30,000 � -
Capitel Expendituraa: �
. . Des19� • - - 30,000 -
R7gM W WaY - - - - . '
Constru�tion
� . � Tofal Expendkures: - . - ' - 30.000 - • --.� '_
Forecasted Project Cost: .
Totdl
. .2014 20�5 21116 2017 201Y-2017
� Funding Soureea:� .
� UnresWetetl Sveet Revenue - - � - -
� GreMS(Fed.State.Locel) �100,OU0 865.000 - - 965,000
. TrafAC Impact Fees 50,000 135,000 - � - 215,000
.Other
Total FunNng Scurcea: 150.000 7.000.000 - �- - - 1,780,000
� CapitelExpenditurea:� ' ' .
� Deslgn 50,000 - , - 80,000
� RlgMof.Wey 100,000 - - - t00,D00 � �
. . � ConsWeffon 1 000 000 � 1 000 000
Total EapendNures: 150,000 1,000,000 - - � 7,180,000
Gren4s 1 OMer Sources: Grant funding is unsecured. � � -
46
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL $TREET FUND{102) Capital Facilit'ies�Pfan
SizYear Capital Facillties Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
ProjectTitle: SE 320thStreet Corridorimprovements . TIP # 42
Project No: cpx7ooc
Project Type: CapaCity
Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#23, 25
� Descrlption;
This project will fund the design, right of way acquisitlon,and construction of a 3 lane�.roadway with bicyde�and pedestrian facil8ies on
SE 320th St belween 124th Ave SE and the westem entrance to GRCC. . � �. .
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operating Budget: .
This projed will.have no impad on.the opereting budget for street maintenance:
Budget: zott rrDneeuai zotz �tBua9e�
. Budgat . Erzpendituras. Budget Balance
� Adopted Budget - . - - -
Budget Artrendments
Adjusted Btidget - . - - -
Activity:
- 2011 YE 2012 Year End
Funding Sourcas: Prior to 20N .EsGmate 2072 8ud et �2073 Bud et Projeet Total
Unrashrcfed Sfreet Revenue� �� � � - - - -
Grents(Fed,State,Local) , - - - - -
. TreRc Impad Feea - - - - -
PLYTFL - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources:�. - - _. _ _
CapihlEzpendNures:
. Design - ' � - - - �
- Right o/Way - - - - -
' QOOSfNC}IOO�
..Total Expenditures: � . .' ' ' " '
Foreeasted Projed Cost:
Total
2014 2075 2018� - 2017 � 2012-2077
� Fuotlirig Sauces:. � �
UnresMcfed Street Revenue � - - ' - - -
GranGS(Fed,Sfete,lotel) � - 51,500 502,100 - 553,600
TreRC Impacf Fees _ 30,000 �8,500 77,900 - 116,400
�PYVTFL - ' - ' -
Other
Total Funding Sourees: � , 30,000 �60,000 560,000 - 670,000
Capital Expendilures:: . .
� Design . 30,000 60,000 - - � 90,000� �
Righto/Way � - . - 60;000 - 60,000� �
Construdion 520 000 520 000�
, Total EzpendMtires:� 30,000 60,OOU 580,000 - 670,000�
� Grents/Other Sources: Grant funding��.is unsecured. .. ," - .
47
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Auburn Way South S Riverwalk Intersection Improvements TIP # 43
Project No: CpxX70c
Project Type: CapaClty
Project Manager: TBD LOS Corridor ID#4
Description:
This proJect will fund the design,right of way acquisition and consVuction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at Aubum
Way S and Riverwalk Dr SE.This project will include creating eastbound/westbound dual left tum lanes,auxiliary signal heads and
pedestrian safety enhancemeMS.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: zott ttDAelual 2ot2 tiBudge!
Budgat Expenditures Budget Balanee
Adopted Budget - - - -
Budget Amentlmenfs - - -
Adjus[ed Budget - - - -
ACYIVny:
2011 YE 2012 Year End
Funding Sources: Prior to 2017 Estimate 2072 Bu 2013 Bu e! Pro'ed Total
Unrestricted Straet Revenue - - - - -
G/ants(Fed,State,LOCaI) - - - - -
Trafl)c Impact Fees - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - -
OUrer
Total Fundi'nj Swrcas: - ' ' ' '
Capifal ErzpendiWres:
Design - - - - -
Right o/Way - - - - -
ConsWCtion
Total EzpendiMes: ' ' ' ' -
Forewsted ProJect Cost:
7ctal
2074 2075 2016 2017 2012-2017
Funding Sourees:
Unrestn'cted SVaet Revenue - - - - -
Grants(Fed,State,Loce1J - 125,000 1,951,000 - 2,076,000
T2(fic Impact Fees - 25,000 299.000 - 324,000
PWTFL - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sour�s: - 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400A00
Capital ExpendiNres:
Design - 150,000 - - 150,000
RightofWey - - 200,000 - 200,000
Construetion 2,050,000 2 050 000
Total Expendituras: • 150,000 2,250,000 - 2,400,000
Grants/Other Sources: Grent funding is unsecured.
48
CityofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) � `Capital Eacilit�es Plan
SIx Year Capital FaeilltiesPlan,2012-2017_ _ : _.. _. Special.Revenue Fund
Project 7iae: Environmerhal Park Roadway Improvemer�ts Study TIP # 47
Project No: Cpx�oac,
Project Type: Capaeity
Projgct Manager. TBD
Deseription:
�This orolect will fund a . �
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on
. This oroiec[will have no
� Budget ,. zo�� . rronauai so�2 �tsua�
� � Butlget. ExpendHUrea Budgat.. Balanee �
Adopted 8ud9et - � - � - -
Budget Amendments �
. - Adjusfed Budget - - - -
. _. ., ..-- - - �- - - - . _ . _ .. . . _
Activily:
. � 2017 YE .2072 Year End
� Funding Soureeap PAOnw 2011 Eatlmate� 2012 Bud 2073 Bud et Pro eetTotal
� UnrestNCfed SYreet Revenue - - �' - • - . - -
� �GrenGS(Fed,Stete,Loeap - - : - -
� REET - - - - -
PWTFL ' - � ' ' '
Othe�
Total Funding Soureea:. . . . � . . • ' . ' '
Capltal ExpondlNrea: �
� - Des�9� � - - - ' -
, Right o/WeY - -_ . - ' - .
Consbuctlon
Total ExpendHums: � - - � , . - � • �
Foreeasted Projeet Cost: __
Total
, . 2014 .2013 2016 2017 2012-2017
. � Funding Sou2es• . ' � - .
. Unrestneted Street Revenue . • - 5,000 � - 5,000
Grar�(Fed.Sfafe.locaq ' _. , ' . ' '
REET � . .' _ ' '
P4YTFL - � - . - - -
Ofher
�- ToLal Punding Sources: • � - � 5,000 • 5,000
CapNal Expendriurea:
Design - - 5,000 - 5,000
- � . Right o/Way �� . - - - - -
. Construc0'on �
' Total Expendifures: � � - � " - 5.000 -� 5,000
. GrarNS/Other Sources: . - ._ - . _ - .
49
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET"FUND (102) . . capital Faeilities Pian
Six Year Capital Fadlkies Plan,2012-2017 •Special RevenueFund
Project Tnie: Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study TIP # 48
Project No: epl000t
Projea Type: Bike Lanes, Sidewalks and Transit Improvemerrt Study(Capacity)
Project Manager. TBD
Deseription:
This project provides funding to complete a study of the2nd St SE&F St SE corridor between Les Gove Park and Downtown/Wtium.
Improvements may inGude pavement reconsWCtion,sidewalks,access ramps,�signafmod'fiications and�route signing: ��. .
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget: " `
This�project will have no impac[on the operating budget for street maintenance. ' � � �� �
Budget: zo�� rrnaesuai 2o�z �isud9es
- Butlget ExpendlNrea Budget . Balanee
. Adopted Budget - � - . - . � -
Budget Amendments �
Adjusted Audget - - - . " - -- -
AetiVity: '
- 2011 YE 2072 Year ErM
. . . . Fundi�Soureee: Pdor to 20N .Estimate 2012 Bud e4 2073 Bu et• Pro ed ToYal _
_ Unrastncted Sheet Revenue • - 10,000 . . 10,000 ' �
Grents(Fed�State�Locall - - - -- � - . .
REET • - - - � �-.
� PWTFL - - '. _ � -
- ane.
TotalFunding8our�aa: - - 10,000 - -= - �-----� �o,000
CapitalExpentliNres: �� - � .
Deslgn - - 10,000 - - �10,000� �
- Righto%WeY ' ' � - �� . -
Conshuctlon � �
� Total Expendiares:. - • 10,000 - - � . 10,000
Forecasted Project Cost: ' ' ' -
. . � � , �rotar
' 2074 2015 2078 2017�_. __�2012 ZOtt�-
, Fundinp Sourcea: . -. - .
UnresbictedStraetRevenue - - -� � . -� 10,000
Grents(Fed.Stete.LOesQ - - - - � - ,
REET - - - - -
PWTFL - - - - ' - _ .
mner �
Total Funding Swrees: - • - - - 10,000
Capital ExperMlNres: � � .
���9� - - - - � t0.000 . .
RigMO/Wey • ' ' ' '
Constructlon - .
Total Expantliwres: • - - - � 70,000
Grants�l Other Sources: �
$�
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FaciliGes Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Projecrritie: S 316th Street Bicycle $ Pedestrian Improvement Study TIP # 49
Projed No: Cpl000c
Project Type: Class 2 Bike Lanes /Sidewalks (Gapacity)
' Rroject Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#37
Description: '
This project provides�funtling for completing a study to add bicycle and pedestnan facilRies on S 316th St from east of Evergreen �
Heights Elementary to�51 st Ave S. �
Progress Summary: _
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budgetfor street maintenance. � . �
Budget: 2ot� YTDAetual 2012 NBudge! ,
. Budget Expenditures Bud9� Balan�
. . .AdoPfadBudget - - �� ' - -,
, 6udgetAmendmeMS - - - -
� � � Adjustetl 8udget - - - ' -.
ActlVity:
2077 YE 2012 Year End
. .. Fund7ngSourcese. , .-Priorro2011 Eslimate 20726udget 20196ud et Pro' ctTotal
� �UnrestnctedStreetRevenue - - 5,000 .- - 5,000�.
Grants(Fed.Staffi,Locaq - - - - ' '.
REET - - - - -
PWTFL ' ' ' ' '�
Other
� Total Funding Sources: .� - • 5,000 � � - 5,000 �
CapHal Expendikuras: .. . �
Desfgn� - - 5,000 - 5,000
Riphfo/Way - - - - - �
Constrriction -
Toml E�cpandkuresc � - - - 5,000 , - 5.000�
ForecastedProject Cost:
rocai.
. . 2074 2015 �.2076 2017 .2072-2017
� Funding Sources� - � -
Unreshicfed Street Revenue - - - 5,000
Grants fFed,Sfate,LOCaIJ. - - - - '
REET - - - - -
PW7FL - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources: � - - - • . . . 5,000
Capital EzP�kures: � .
pB�� - - - - 5,000
Righto/WeY ' '� ' ' ' -
ConsWCfion �
� , Tofal Expe.ndHures: - - - • 5,000
Grents!OMer Sources: � � � � . -.
51
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) • Capital Faciuties P�aq
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,20'12-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Projea 7itie: East Valley Highway ITS Expansion TIP #' S1
Project No: cpX7ooc
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. ' TBD - LOS GamdorlD# 10
Description:
. �This project will funtl the design, coordination, permitting and wnstrudion of ITS facilities from 41 st St SE to Lake Tapps Parkway.��
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget: -
The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be$5000.
Budget: 2011 YTD Aetual. � 2012 � 71:BudOat
� Budge! E7cpendituras �Budpet � Balanea -
AdoptedBudget - � � - - - -
�Budget Amendments ' - .
Adjusted Budget - - - -_ - --
Activity:
� 2011 YE � 2072 Year.End .
� Fundin8 Sourees: Prior to 2077 Estimate 2012 Bud et 2013 Bud et- Pro eef.7otal
UnresVicted SVeet Revenue - - . - - � - �
� Grants(Fed,State,Locaq - - - 692,000
- . � REET - - - - ' '�-
. Tralfic Impact Fees - - - . 108,000 ' -
� . .. . OMer _ .. . . .
� Total Fundin0 Sourcas: - - - 800.000 � -
' . Capital Expenditures: . ' .. �
Design� - - - �85,000 -
Righto/WaY - ' . ' ' � '
. Construction - 715 000
Total ExpendHures: • - � - � 8U0,000
forecasted Project Cost:
. . ' � � Total
- � 2074 � 2015 2018 2017_ - -2072-ZD17. �
Funding Sources: • - � , - -
UnresMCted Sheet Revenue - - - - � -
Granfs(Fed,State,Locaq - - - � - � 692,000
REET ' ' ' '
TraTc Impact Fees - - - - �08,000
Other
� � . Total Funding Sourees: • - � - - 800,000 �
� . CapiWl Eupendkures: � ' . '
' Design - ' ' ' 85,000
Right o/Way - - - - -
ConstructMn 715000
Total Ezpenditures: - - - � . � 800,000 �
� Grants/ONer Sources:. Grent funding is unsewred. � �
$2
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
.. ARTERIAL STREE7 FUND (102) Cap�4a1 Faciuties e�an
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fuod
Project Title: 37th Street SE 8 R Street SE Pedestrian'Connector TIP.# 53
Project No: cp0803
Pro�ect Type: Class 1 Trail (Capaeiry)
Frojeot Manager. Leah Dunsdon -
_ -
- Descdption: -
This project will construpt a pedestrian connection between 37th ST SE 8 R St pro4iding a Iink�beriJeen south Aubum and�the W hite� �
' � River Trail and Game Farm Park. � - � ' �
' Progress Summary:
Project construction is expected to be completed in 2011.
Future Impact on Operating Budget: .
� This prvject will have no impad on the operating budget for street maintenance. ' . �
' Budget: - - '2o�t • vTOaetuai 20�2 ttsuagee �
� � BuEget Expenditures Budget Balanee
�. � AdoptedBtidget - - ' .
BudgetAmendments - � - - - �
AdjustedBudget ... _ - _ - -- _ - _ ,
Activity: '
2011YE 2072YeacEnd �
Funding Sourees: -. Prior W 2017 � . Estimafe . 20'12 Bud et. . 2073 Bud ! Pro eet Total. .�
UnresMctedStreetRevenue „ ' ���� 9,400 � � : 64,100 1,000� , . - � -
Grants(Stete)�� 27,900 96,400 - - -
TraRC MBigation Fees , - -� - - -
� PWTFL ' - - - -
Otl�er
Tofal Funding Sourcea: � - � �37,300 � 160,500 1,000 � � • -
Capital F�enditures:
'Design �37,300 10,000 - - �47,300
Right o/WaY - - - ' '
�Construction. 150,500 1,000 151,500
, Total ExpendHures: . , . 37,300 _ .160,500� 1,000 - 798,800 ,
' Forecasted Project Cost: .
� 7ofal
� 2014 2015 2076 :2077 2072-2017
Funding Sources: .- . . -� � .
Unrestncted Sfreat Revewe � - - � - - - 1,000
Grents(Stete) � - -� - - -
T2R'ic Mifigation Fees - - - - -
PWTFL � - - - - - �
Otlrer
� TotalFundingSources: . -' - -� - - 1,000 �
Capital Expendkures: � .
. 'Desi9n � . _ .' ' ' .
. Righf o/WaY ' - - - '
� ConsWCtion � 1000
�, ' - ToWI Expenditures: � ' � - - � - • . . 7,000 � �
Grants/Other Sources: Grant funding is Stale�Ped&B(ke Safery GranL . .-
53
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAI. STREET FUND (102) Cap�fai Faci��ties:P�an
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revewe,Fund
Project Tit�e: Kersey Way Study TIP# 54
Project No: � cp7ooa �
Projed Type: CapaCity
Projed Managec TBD LOS'CorridorlD#4
Description: - - ----_"--_
This projed will study improvements to the Kersey Way SE corridor from the W hite River Bridge to the southem dty Ifmits;Tfie
study will develop the scope and costs forhorizontal/vertical geometric roadway improvements,roadside'hazard mitigatl'on;street
ligtiting and non-motorized trail construc[ion.The projec[length is approximately two miles.
__
Progress Summary: '
Design will begin:in 2017.
Future ImpaM on Operating Budget:
None
BudgBt: � � 2011 YTD Actual - 2072 11 Budget
�Budget. E�m�diWrss . Budpat. . ,. .Balenee
AdoPtedBudget - . - _ . -, __ ____—_ -_ _
� �BudgetAmentlments �
Adjusted6udqet - - � _.
_. _ _
AMivity: . _ . _ . . _. _. _
� . 2071 YE 2072 Year Entl
� . . .... Funding Souraes:. .; Prioc W 20'11 .�.. .EstlnwDS 2012 BuAget� 2013 Bud � .P�� eet Totai__ .
� Unrashicted SYreef Revenue . -. . _ - _ . . . .- .. -_ .. ._ .. .
Grants(Fetl.Sfete.LocaQ ' - � - - � - "
- - �� REET - - - . -
Trefic Impect Fees - - -
Other
, Tobl FunAing Sources:� ' ' ' " � - - � �-- --
Capital E�endkurac:�.
. pgs18� ' ' ' . ' '
Righto/Way� • ' ' � ' '
- Construction
Toml ExpenARwas: - . - � _. _.
Forecasted Projeet Cost: ;
Total
� 2014 - �2015 2018 . .2U17 2012-20'17 .
Funding Sources:. . . . . .
UnresMcted Street Revenue - - - _.
Grants(Fed.Stefa.LocaQ ' ' ' 25�.00� � �250.000
REET�� • ' ' ' � -
� Tfelfic Impect Fees - - , 100,000 700,000
� Ofher(Develo,oer)• - . .
Total Funding Soureu: - - � -- -3W,000 350,OOU �
Capital Expendkuras:�. � .
�s�g� - - � � - 350,000 350,000 ,
Righf o/Wey - - � _ . � � _
Conshuction
, ToplF�pendRures: - - - 350,000 -�350,000�
Grants/Other Sources: � � � . . . �
54
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) - : Captta►Faei�nies e�an
Six Year,Capifal Faeillties Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue.Fund'
Project Title: Aubum Way South Corridorimp., Fr ST SE to Hemlock ST SE TIP# 58
Project No: cp1119
Projed Type: Capacity
Pioject Manager. Leah Dunsdon LOS Cortidor ID#4
Dese�iption:
This proJeG will widen Aubum Way South behveen Fir St SE and Hemlodc St SE to�frve lanes w8h curb,gutter,sidewalks,illumination
� and storm improvemanis.A new trstfic signal will also be constructed at Hamlock Street SE and connect to Aubum's Irrtelligent �
� Transportation System.
Progress Summary:
WashingtonState Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)awarded grant in the amourrt of$2,426,400 on November 19,
2010 to the City of Aubum. .
Future Impact on Operating Budget
This annual�.maintenance cost for,this project is estimated to be$9,300. �
Budget: 2041� � �YTD Aetuel 2ot2 17 8utlget
� Budget ExpanEkurea Budget Balanee
Adopted Budget_ _ . . _
Budget Amentlmeres �
�Adjusted Budget - - - -
/1ctNity:
2011 YE� 2012 Year End•
Funding Sourc.es: Prior to 2077 EstimMe .2072 Bud et � 2013 B et Pro' Total
Unresficted S6eet Revanue � - - - � .-
� Greets,(Stete) �' ' - 237,000 2,189,400 - 2,426,400 �
TraKm Impact Fees - .- - - ._
Other Sources(MUCkles�ooq �59 300' S47 300 606 600
Total Funding Sources: - 296,900 2,796,7D0 3,033,000
Capipl Expendih�res:
Design '�� - � - 281;300 77.000 • 358,300
. RightoiWey - 15.OD0 262,000 - 277,000
Construction � 2 397 700 � 2 397 700� .
Totel Expenditmes: - 296,300 2,738,700 - .3,033,000. �
Foreeasted ProJeet Cost:
ToSal
� � . 2074 2015 2018 2017 2012-2017.
Funtlfng Sourees: �
� UnrestnCed�Sbeet Revewe - - - _ _
GreMs(Sfefe) .. .. - - ' ' 2J89,400
Tra!lIc Impea Fees - - - - -
. OMerSources(Mutkleshoot) � - 547300 �
Total Fundir�Soureea: - " . - . 3,033,000
� � Capital ExpendLLurea: �
��s� - - - - n.000
RIgMWWey � � ' ' ' ' . 262�000
� Construefion , � - 2.397 700
Total Exyendllurea: - - • ' Y.736.700
Grants/Other Sources: Stata GraM is TIB. 55' �
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capaai Fauiwes Pian
Six Year_Capital_FaelltUes Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project Tine: Aubum Way South Corridor Improvemer� Phase 1 TIP# 2
Project No: CplooOC . . . . .
erojea T.ype: Non-Motorized �
Project Msnager. TBD LOS Corcidor ID#4
-- --- .. _
DescripUonc
This.project will.construct.pedestrian improvemeMS�along Aubum Way South behveen Dogwood St SE�and Fir St SE that are consistent
with.WSDOTS�SR-164 RouteDe4elopmeM Plan.This project includes sidewalk improvements,�access managemerrt,a mitl-block
pedestrian crossing,construdion of a u-tum wedge at Fir St SE and sUeet lighting. -
Progress Summary:
Project design will begin in 2011 with construction expected to be completed"in 2013.
Future Impaet on Opereting Budget:
�' This projed will have no impact on the.opereting budget for sVeet maintenance. . •
� BudgM:. � 20tt YTDAetuel 2072 - 7tBudget �
� . Budget Expendlwres BuEgeY. Belariee
Adopted Budge[ • - ' - -
� BuCget AmerMrtrents
Adjusted Budget - - - -
Ar.tiVity:
zo��re 2012 Year End
' . Funding Sourcea: Priorto 2071 Esdmate 2072 HuA °.2013 B eetTotal
' � Unrestrfcted Street Revenue � - 10.000 . 46,500 � � 43;500 - -' �'�56,500
GraMS(Fed,Stete.Loceq - 40.00U BO,U00 740,800 1U0,000
� T/eRIC ITFIBCI F6B5 - - - � - -
� � Ofher Sources
. Total Funding Sources: - 50,000 �106,5D0 784,300 156,500�
Caplfal E�o�dkures: � .
Design - 50.000 105,000 � 40,U00� 155,000
- � Rfghto/Way - - 1'.500 � - 1,500 �
Consfruction � � 744 300
- Total Ecpandltures: - 30,000 " 108,500 784,900 156.500
Forewsted ProJeet Cost:
Tota�
. 2074 2015 2016�� �2077 . ..�-2012•.2017 _
FundingSources: _ .- .. _._ �- _....- - .
� � UnresWcfed Sheet Revenue - - - - 90,000 �
� Grents(Fed,Sfate,Loca1) - - - - 800,800
� ` TreAfc Impact Fees - - � � - - .
Other Sourees
Total Funding Soureea: - - � - - � � 890,800 �
, Capital Expendkures: � - �
Design - - ' � - . , _ � ta5.000
RfghtolWaY - - - � - . 1.500 '
ConsfiicNon � 744 300
Total Expendituras: - - � - - 890,800 �
, Grerhs/Olher Sources: Grents are$100K from Federal Discretionary Funtls antl$740,830 from State PeA 8 Bike Satery Grarhs.
56
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capftal Faeflitles Plan
"Six Yeai Capkal FacillUes Plan,2D12-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Froject 7itle: Auburn Way Corridor Imp. (4th St NE to 4th St SE). TIP # 3
ProjectNo: C40980
Project Type: Non-CepaCity
Projed Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID#23
Description: -
This project is based on a pre-design study and is intended to improve pedestrian accessibiliry,appearence,and link the
downtown area along Aubum Way South'between 4th St NE and 4th SYSE. Shis project may inGude some pavement
repairs. However,an oveday was completed as part of the City's Arterial Pavement Preservation Program in 2007. Although
this.was considered a temporary fuc,the scope has been modified to acoourrt for the pavemerit work:The project length is:
approximately a half mile.
Progress Summary:
The pavement portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial PavemerrtPreservation
Program.
Future Impact on OperaUng Budget:.
This project will have no impad on the opereting budget for street maintenance.
Budget: smt vrDnesual m�z �i Budpec
e�agee �enam�re8 suaoe� sa�anee
Adoptetl.Budget � - - - -
Budqet Amendments -
Ad/usted Budget - - - -
ACtfVf�/: . . .. _ . . . .
. 2011 YE� 2012Year End
. Funding Sourees: Prfor to ZON �Estlmate.. �20'12 Bud et 2013�Bud et Pro et Total
� � UnresMCfedStreetRevenue� 78.251 �- - - - �- - 78251
Grertfs(Fed.SYete,LOCaq ' - - - -
REET - - - - -
TraRC Impect Fees - - - - -
Other Souroes
Total Funding Sources: 78,251 - � - ' • 78,231 .
Capifal ExpendNu�os:
� Design 78.251 - . - - 78,251
Rlghfo/Wey - - � - - - -
ConsWCtion �
ToYal Expendkures: � � 78,257� � . � - • - 78,251
Foreeasted Projeet Cost -
Tofel
2014 � 21N5 2076 �2077� 2012•2017� .
-- FundingSoureesr. � . . .
Unreshlcted SYreet Revenue - - 710,000 800,000 710,000
Gran4a(Fed,Stete,Loceq - - 708,700 2,400.000 3,108,700 -
REET - . - - - '
TreTe Impaef Fees - - - - -
OMer Sources ' -
�Total Funding Sourcas: - . . - 818,700 3,000.000 3,618,700
Capital ExpandlNrea: �
Deslgn � - - 618.700 - 618,700
RfgAto/Wey � - - 200,000 - 200,000�
' ConsVUCtlon 3 000 000 3 000 000
. . Total Expendlturea: • � � - . 818,700 3,000.000 -3,818,700
Grants!Other Sources: GreM tunding is not seeured: � � � - -� -• � -
5�
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL,STREET fUND (102) Caplta�Facuities P�an
Siz Year Capital Facflkias Plan,2012-2017 Speelal Revenue Fund
Projeot rttle; 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP # 7
Projed No[ CploOa'
Projed Type: No11-CapaGity
Projed Manager. TBD LOS COrridOr ID# 12
Deseiiption•
This project was originally scoped to inGude pavement preservation. The pavement preservation component could still be
combined with this project, but is also eligible for the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. This projed sAOUId look to
improve the railroad crossing grades as well as the vertical sigM disfance to the interurban trail to the west of the tracks. The
cost estimate listed below is planning level cost.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impad on the opereting budget for street maintenance.
BudgBt: zotl YTDF�tlual .zo12. tlBuapet
. _ . Budget Eupendkures Budget Balanee . ..
� AdoptedBudget - - � - -
BudgetAmendmeMs
AdJusted Budget - - _ . _
Aetivity: -
� 2011 YE 2072 Year.End
. . . Fun0ing Sourees: � Pdorto 20N . �� Estlmate 2012 Bud 2013 Butlget � Pro aet Tofel
Unrestrided Street Revenue - - - _ _
Grents.(Fed,SYate,Lxal) ' ' ' ' ' �
REET - - - ' . '
TreRk Mi6'gafion Funds - - - -
Ofher
Totel Funding Soureea: - - - _ - r
Caplfal.Fxpandl W ros:
pesign ' _ - ' '
Rlght of�Way - - � - - -
� Con�ion
. . Total ExpendlWrea: ' ' ' ' . .
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
. rotal
' � 2014 2075 2016 2017- - 2012-Z017
Funding Sourees: .
. Unreshicted Sbeef Revenue - - 75,000� 500,000 � 575,000
. � GraMS(Fed,Stete,LOtaQ - - 300,000 � 2,500,000 2,800;000
REET - - - - '
T�MiSgetbn Funds - - .
Otl�er
. �TMaI�FundingSources: - - 375,000 3,000,000 ' 3,375.000
Caplfal Eupendltures: .
� Design - - 375,000 - 375,000 �
Rlght o(Way - - - - -
ConsWdlon 3000�000 � 3000000 �
7otnl Expandilurea: - - 375,000 3,000,000 3.375,000 '
Grants/Ofher Sourees: GraM funding is unsacured. �
$8
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREETFUND"(102) Cap�ta�Faeiptles Pwn ,
Six Yesr Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fand
Project Title: Aubum'Way North/ 1 st Street NE Signal Improvements TIP # 19
Project No: cp7000c
Projea Type: Non-Capacity
ProjecrManagec TBD LOS Corridor ID#2
Deseription:
This projed will construd a new complete traffic signal.with controller cabinet andbattery badcup along with necessary
intersection improvements.
Progress Summary: -
Design will be completed in 20'13. Construction isplanned for 2014.
Fulure Impact on Operating Budgetc
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance:
Budget: 2ott vTOame�+ai 2otz ��.eudget
e�a¢oe ���aie� e�a9�e saie��
Adopled 8udget - � _ - � � - - � _
BudgetAmendmeMs
Adjusted Budget - - - , _
Aativfty:
� � 20t7 YE � 2012 Year End �.
Funding Sourees: Priw to 2011 EstlmaOe 2012 Bud � _� 2013 Bud et . P � e�Total �
� Unresficfed Sheef Reven� - �' ' ' � 50.000
G�aMS(Fed,Sfate.LOCaq - - - - -
T/alRc Impabt Fees - - - - _
Other
Total Funding Swrees:. ' ' ' Sp.Opp -
Capital E�endiluras: �
�esl8� . - - - �50,0�0 .
,RlpMofWay - - - ' -
Constructlon .
TotalEzparMiturea:� ' ' • 50�000 -
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
2014 201i 2078 2017 2072-2017
.funding Soureas: �- "
' . - UmesMdeO�SheetRevenue 125,000 - - � - 175,000
G/ants(Fed,Stefe,LoceQ. 425,000 - - - 425,000
Trafllc Imped Fees - - - - _
Otl�er
Total FuMing Soureea: _ 550,000 ' �- � - . .� 600,000
CapMal EzpenHilurea: � �
Desfgn . - - - - 50,000
RightofWay 100,000 � - - - �100,000
. Construafon 450.000 ' qsp ppp �
Total E�andiluren: - 550,000 - - - spp,p�
Gre�s/Other Sources: � Grant tunding is unseeureE. . . . -
59
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faciiiues Pwn
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2012-20'17 Speeial Revenue Fund
Project Tit�e: C Street NW and West Main Street TIP# 21
Project No: cplaooc
Project Type: Non Capacity
Project Manager: TBD LOS Comdoc ID#11
Desaiption:
Reconshud intersection at C St NW and W Main St. Project would include a new treffic signal and modifications to the
tuming radii at each comer to help facilitate vehicular movemerrts: The new traffic signal would allow forprotected left turti
phasing for northbound and southbound left tum movements. This'would also provide additional safety related to the iailroad
pre-emption.
Progress Summary: '
Future lmpad on Opereting Budget: "
This projed will have no impad on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budger 2ott YrDnetuai zo�z �teuegat
�. Budgat Expenakures Budgat �Balanee
.. . , AdoPtedBudget ' . � ' - ' .'
. BudgetAmendmeMS �
. AdJusted Budgef - - - . � .
ACt1Vfry: . . .
zo��re m�z r�r�a
Funama sou�ees: rr�orco zo+� esstmace 20�2 e�e e� w�s s ec �eu rorai
Unresblded Sfreet Revenue - - - - 20,000 � -
Grarrts(Fed.Slete.Locaq - ' - 80.000 �-
� . REET ' ' ' ' '
Tralfie Impaai Fees - - - - .
omer
Total Funding Sources: " ' ' 100.000--�- - �-— -
Capkal�pendKure6:
Design - - - 100,000 100,000
� Right o/Wey - - - � - -
Construction �� �
- romi�e�an�res: - - • �ao,000 -
Foreeasted.Projeet Cost:
Total
- - 2074 2015 Y076 . :_2017 .2012-2U17
Funding8oureea: � . - ' .. .
UnresWaed Sheet Reventie 200,000 - - - 220,000
Grents(Fed,Stafe,LocalJ B00,000 - - � - . 880,000
REET - - - - -
� Tralllc Impect Frees - - - �� - -
OMer
Total FundingSoureea: �,000,000 - • - - 1,100,000
. CapNel F�tpendilurea:
� Design - - - - 100,000
RightolWay 400,000 - - - 400,000 .
Construttion 600.000 600 000
Total Expendkures: 7.000.000 - � . -. 7:700,OW
. G2MS/Othar Souroes: GraM Funding is unsacured. -
60
City of Aubum Capifal Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Specfal Revenue Fund
Project Title: F StreetSE 8 4th Street SE Traffic Signal TIP # 25
Project No: cp0914
Project Type: Non-Capacity Intersection Improvement.
Project Manager: JeCOb SWeeting
Descrlptfon: �
� This.project inGudesdhe construction of a new traftic signal at the intersection of 4th St SE and F�St�SE. Intersection improyements will
. include crosswalks and pedestrian signals: This projeot was ulected based on�accident history,haffic volumes,and..pedestrian Flow
pattems. '
Progress Summary:
Project was completed in 20'11.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
. The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated tobe$6,600. . .
BUdg2t: . . ' . � 201T � YTDAChial .2072 ��suaget . .
� � � � • Budget E�enditures Budget. Balance � �
Adopfed Budget - - � . . - .
. Budget Amendmente. � - • - -� - � - '
� Ad%usted Budget -_ . . - - -' --�-- -� .
Activity:
� � 2011YE 20�4Year.End�- .
FundingSourcen: .PriorM2071 FaSimate 20'128udet " .2013�Bud Pro'eetTOtal" �
UnrestnctedStreetRevenue � 7,807 . � 1,090� � ,1,000' � - � . � 9,897
Grants(Fed,Stafe,LOCaIJ 265,633 127,470 - , � - 393,103
REET - - - - -
P4YTFL - '� � - - -
OMer
� Total Funding Sources: ' 273,440 128,560 1,000 - . 403,OD0
Capltel Expenditures:
�Design - 48,168 -� - � - 48,168 �
RigM o1 WaY - ' . ' ' ' '
� ConsWCtion. 225 272 . 128 560� � 1 000 354�832
� ToWI Expenditures: . � , _273,440 .,-.128,560 - 1,000 - 403,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
rmai
2074�. . 2075 2076 2017 2012-Z077
Funding Sourcea:� . � . � ��
Unresfided Sfreet Revenue � - - - - 1,000
Grents(Fed,SfateiLOCaQ � - - - - - �
REET � - � . . � .
� PWTFL - -� - • -
- - Other �� �
Total Funding Sourees: , _ _ , . -. • . , - - 1,000
Capltal Expenditures: . . .
'Desi9n - ' - - . .
' R(ght of Way " - - - - -
ConsWCfion 1,000
� ToTal E�endiNrea: .. � -; _ - - - - 1,000
. Grarnsi OMer Sources: Grant isFedaral,HSIP funded and does�nat require a dry match. .,.
61
Ciry ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND(102) CapNal Facilitie"s P�an
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project 7itle: 41st StreetSE and A Street SE Access ManagemeM Study TIP #':27
ProjectNo: cp7110
Project rype: Safety(Non-Gapacity) �-
Project Managec Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID#:7 Q33
Description:
Study the area from 37th St SE W the White River on A St SE including 41 st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. ?he study '
should review the safery and access needs of the traveling public and the adjacent propertiesi
Progress Summary:
Pre-design will be done to reflne projed scope,alignment, and cost.
Future Impact on OperaUng Budget:
This study will have ho impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget:� 20N VTDAcfual 20'12 MBUdgal:
Budget - Expanditures� BudgN. �Balenee ' �
� � Adopted8udget - . -� - � � -
Butlget Amendments
Adjusted Budget � - � - - - � . �
Activity:
. � - ' 2077YE�. �2012YearEnd
� � Fu'MIng�Sourees:,. Pdorto20'H � EsNmate 2012Bud M' 2013Bud t . .P� ectTotal__ -
� � � Unrestncterl StreetRevenue� ' . � �8,000 � 2,000'-• - - - . � - - ---� 10,000 -
� �Grents(Fed,State,LOwq - - - _ . � " �
. � � REET� - - - - � -
. TraRcMltlgation�Fees - - - -
� � �-0ther ' � .
� �� � ToWI Funding Sourees: �- 8,000 � .2,000 � -. � 70,000
.. Capital Ezpenditures: � .
� Design - 8,000 2,000 - ��0,000
� RightolWay _ _ _ _ .. ' .
� �Conshuctlon
' TotalExpendkures: - B4O00 2,000 . -" - - � 10,000 � �
Forebasted Froject Cost: -
. . - . Total �
' ' 2014 2015 .2016 � � '2077 � � 2012-201Z. -
Funding Sources: � . - � .
� �Unrestncted Sf/eet Revenue - - - � � . � 2.OU0
Giarrts(Fed,Stste,Local) ' ' - . _ � .
REE7 - - � . . - . -
� TraRc Impact Fees. - _ - - ' . _
Other
Tofal Funding Sourees: -� - - . . 2,000 �
Capkal E�ryandkures: � , �
Design ' ' - ' 2,000 �
Righto/Wey -� - - - -
- Conshuctlom �
� �TOSaI Expendkures: ' ' ' ' 2,000
Grants I.Ofher Sources: �
62 �
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET EUND (102) � cap�a�Facutt�es p�an
Six Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Tnie: Mnual BHdge Rreservatlon Project TIP # 28
Projed No: V0�i0U5 - � '
Project Type: Non-Capaeity(Mnual)
Project Manager. Seth wCkstrom ,
Description:
� This is an annual level of efFort pro}ect used M fund bridge improvements as identified by the cRy's annual bridge inspection program.
Progress Summary:
Program completed load rating ralculatbns for nine bridges in 2011.
Future Impact on Operaling Budget:
� This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
BUdgBt: , � � 2011 YTDAetual 2012 77 Budget--
• Budget Expendltures Budget Balanee
AdoFted&idget ' � '. ' '
Budget AmarMmenfs - - - -
Ad%usted Budget _ - - - -
ActlVity:
2011 YE� 2012 Year E�M
Funding Sources: PHor to 2011 Estlmate 2012 Bud et . �2013 Bud Pro ed Total
UnresMcfed Street Revenue � - 100,000 50,000 � 50,000 150,000
Grants(Fed,Stefe;Loeel) - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Tra!/k MlNgatlon Fees� - - - - . -
OUrer
Total Funding Sourees: � • 700,000 SO,U00 50,000 150,000
Cepltal Ezpenditures:
pgslgn ' ' ' ' '
Right ol WaY - - - - -
ConsWCWn 100 000 50 000 50 000 150 000
Total ExpendlWees: • - 100,000 50,000 50.000 150.000
forecasted Project Cost:
Total
. 2074 .2013 �2078 2017 2012,2017.
Fu'Ming Sourees: -
- UnreshiaedStreetRevenue � - 50,000 � 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 -
Granfs(Fetl.Sfate,LOCeI) - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Tra1(c Mifigatlon Fees - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources: SO.00D 50,000 50,000 50,000 3U0,000
Capltal Eapendilurea:
Desi9n - - - - -
Rghto/WaY � ' - - -
Constructlan 50 000 50 000 W 000 50.000 300 000
Total Expendilurea: 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 50.000 300,000 '
Gfants/Other Sources: . ' �
63
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET'FUND (102) ° ¢apital Fa_c�lit�es P�an
- _
Six Year Capital FaeilBies Plan,2012-2017 Special Rev`enue Fund
aroject Tine: South 277th -Wetland Mitigation TIP # 29
Project No: c410a0
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity -
Project Manager. Leah Dunsdon -
Deseription: �
Wetland mitigatlon for the 277th St Grade Separation project. �
Progress Summary:
This is a 10-year obligation,which began in 2004.
`-
Future Impad on Operating Budget: - -
This project will have naimpac[on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: 20�� rrnace�ai zo�z tt Bi,dgee
. e�a¢.e �»oa� s„d��� eaw��
AtloptedButlget - - � - . �- -
� _ Budget Amendmerns . ' - - � -
�� . Adjusted Budget - - - . • -
Activity: .
' � 20N YE 2012.Year End
., ' . Fdnding Sourees: Pdor.to 2071 Fstimate .2012�Bud et - �2013�Bud _ _Prc ec[SOtal._.
UnrasVicted Street Revenue 128,Y20 122,400 25,000 ` . 25,000 . " 273,820� �
Grenta(Fed.State.LocaQ - - - - ' - '
R� - - - ' -
� � T/alficlmpecfFees� - - � -� - _
. OMer
Totel Funding Souroes: 728,220 722,400 25,000 25,000 273,fi20
� � Capkel E�andlWres: .. . .�..,..
Deslgn 81,903 31.000 12,500 12,500 �125,403
� Right o/Wey - - - - �
' ConsWefion 44 317� 91 400 '12 500 12 500 148 17
. . �TOtal6cpenAlWres: tY8,220 1YL.400 25,000 . 25.000 . 273.820
` '___ __ _. __ .
Forecasted Project Cost: - - - -
Total
2074 2015 2016 . . �.2017 2012-207E.
� Funding Sourees: � - � --- — - --- - -.—
' UnreshictedShoetRevenue. 25,000 - - ' -. 75,000
Grarrts(fred�S7ete�locaq - - .. - - -
REET - - - � - .
_ TreRc Impact Fees� - - - -
OMer
'TOtalFUndfng90urees: 25,000 -� • � - �75,000
� CapMal E�endkures:
...Design 12.500 - - - 97.500
Right ol Way - - - - -
Consbuctlon 12.500 - - � - 37 500
. Totai Expendkures: 25�000 .. -- _. _ 75.000�
Granis 1 Other Sources: �
�
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL,STREET FUND (102) Cepltal Fac'ifhfes Plan -
�Six Xear Capital Facillties PIan,2012-2017 Specfal Revenue Fund
Project r�tie: Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program . TIP #.30
Project No: Cpl000c
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Bi-Mnuai) - •
Project Managec Pablo Para
DescripUon:
This is a bi-annuaF IeveP of effort project used to fund small pedestrian safety studies and improvement projects.This project_ ,
provides for pedestrian safety studies and improvements at various locations citywide. Projects are prioritizsd annually '
based on safety issues and pedestrian demands. -
Progress Summary:
Projed for 2011 was preliminary design of 8th StNE and SE 104th St intersedion improvements.:2012 projed is access
improvements at Aubum Ave and 3rd Sf,NE: .
FuWre Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for streetmaintenance.
eudget: zott rTnnewai so�z t� suaeec
.� �� , �Budget Expentli[ures Budget Balanee
� Adopted Butlget � - - � - - -.
BudgefAmendmeMS , ' - - -
- Adjusted BudgeP , - - - � -
Activity:
. 2017 YE 2012 Year End.
. � Funding Sourees:� Prior to 2077 Esflmate .2012Bud .2013 Bud et Pro'eet Total
UnresMdedStreetRevenue - - �1D0,000 ' 100,000 �
� Giants(Fed,State.LocaQ - - ' - -
� REET ' - ' . - ' -
Tretfic Impect Fees - - - - - - -
Other
To[alFUnding Sources: '� - • 100,000� : • � 700,000� ,
Capital ExpendlWres: ,
' Design �-� - 10,000 - 10,000
Rghto/Way - � - - - -
Consvuction 90 000 90 000� .
Total Expenditures: � .' - . 700,000- ' � - 700,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
.. - � � Total
' � 2074 2075 �2016 �2077 2072-2017
Funding Sourees:� -
UnresMCted Street Revenue � 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 _
Grenta(Fed,State.Local) ' ' ' ' '
' REET - � - - - -
Treffic Impact Fees� . - - . ' - � - '
Other
Total Funding Sourees: . 100,000 -� 700,000 • 300,000 '
Capipl Expendllures: - � � . �
� - Deslgn � � � . 10,000 -� 10,000 - 30.000 - .
.Righto(Way . - . - - -
ConsVUCNon � 90 000� 90000 270000
� Total Expendltures: .. . � 100,000 - 100,000 . - -� 300,000 .
� Grants/Other Sources: � �
65
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) ` ' � cap�ta�,Facppties e�an
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan;2012-2017 Special Revenue_Fund
Projea Titie: Citywide Arterial Bicycle 8 Safety Improvements TIR#: 31
Project No: Cpx7oa
Project Type: Non-Capaciry(Safety) �
Project Manager. Varioua ,.
Description:
This is an annual levef of effort projed focused on funding bicycle and safety improvements on classified'roadways. Projects
are prioritiietl annually based upon field studies. Project was previously called"Citywide Roadway Safety Infrastructure
Irriproyements. � ' .
Progress Summary:
Projecfs for 20'11 included preliminary design of intersection improvements at Sth st NE and SE 104th S;and pedestrian traif
improvements at 37th St SE. 2012 Projec4 has yet to be indent�ed.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This projed willhaveno impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budgeti zo�t rroneM,ai zo�z �t eua9�
' � � Budget Expenditures Budget. � Balanee
. Adopted Budget ' ' - - - �- - -- - -
. . . , Budget Amendments
- � Adjusted Budget - - - � -
Activity:
� � 2011 YE 2012 Year End � �
' Funding Sources: Prior to 2011 ..Estimate 2012 Bud et . 20138ud �et Pro ect Total
� � . UnresMcted Streef Revenue 19,300 100,000 100,000 100,000 � - 219,300
GraMS(Fed,SYate,Lowl) - - -- - , �_ - -
REET - - - - -
- Trafic Impect Fees - - - - , -
Other
, �- � TotalFunAingSourcas: 19,300 100,000 �.700,000 .t00,U00 219,900 ' -
� . Capital Expenditures: . . .
, � -Design 19,300 57,000 10.000 10,000 �. 86,300
Rfght o(WeY ' - - . .- .
. . Construction 43.000 ���90 000 90,000 � . 133 ODO
- . � 'Toql ExpendiW,es: 79,300 700,000 700,000� � ' - 100,000 219,300 '
Forecasted Project CosY. '
Sotal
2074 2015 2016 2017 . _._,2012-20tt .
Funding Sources: . �� �-- �-� �
. � � Unres6icted SGeet Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 � 100,000 "� 600,000
GreMS(Fed.State.Looaq - - - ' ' -
REET - - - ' - _
. �Tiallk Impact Fees - - - . _ _
Othei
Total Funding Soureas: 700,000 700,000 700,000 100,000 �800,000
Capifal E�cpentlltures: . �
Design 10,000 70,000 10,000 � 10,000 60,000
Righto/Way - - - - -
� . ConsWCtion 90 ODO 90-000� - -90 ODO " 90 000 540 000 ��
� 'TofalExpendifures: 700,000 700,000 100.000 �100,000 600,000 '
G2nts/Other Saurces: � � � .
66 .
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
_ - _ - ----- -- -
ARTERIAL STREET FUND.(102)- Cap�l Pae'ii�es Pian
. Sfx Year Capital FacilRies'Plan,2012-2017 Speeial RevendeFund
Project Tine: Railroad Cros§ing Safety Improvements TIP # 38
Project No: Cp�000c '"
Projea Type: Intersection Safety(Non-Capacity) .
ProjeG Manager. TBD
Descriptlon:
This project will fund the design,coordination,pertnitting and conskuction of four quadraM gates at the W Main St, 3rd St NW,and 37th
St NW BNSF Railroad crossings as welfasadive grade crossing lights and gates at the private spur crossings on�C St SW and A St
NW.
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
The�annual maintenance cost for this projed�isestimated to be$5,000. � .
Budget 2ott vruncn,ai zo�z t� eud�
s�aaes �am� euae� ea�,m :
aao�eea eii"dge� -. - . - -
eudper nrrrendmerNs
Adjusted Budget - .. - - '
ACtlVity:
� 2071 YE 2U72 Year End
Funding Sourees: Prfor to 20N _ Estlmate_ 2012 Butlget. _ 2073 Butl et Pro'eot Tapl
UnresMCted SYreet Revenue ' - - - - � - -
GraMS(Fed.Stete.Loca9 - - - - -
REET . - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources: � - • - - -
Cepltel E�endkuras:
�� - - - - -
R7ghtofWay - - � - - -
Constniction
Total Expentlitures: - - - - - -
ForecastedProjedCost: _ _ __ .
TMaI
� 2014 2075 � 2078 2017 .2012-2017
Funtling Soumes: -� -
UnresMCtedSYieeiRevenue"� ' '" 100,000 150,000 - 250,000
GraMS(Fed.Sfate,LOCeQ 1�J00.000 1,650.000 - � 2,750,000�
REET . . � - � - � - • -
Other
Total Funding Sourees: - 1,200,000 1,800,000 • 3,000,000
Capital Expenditures: " � - - .
Design � - 200,000 300,000 - 500,000
RlghtO7Way � . � - � - - - -�
� Cons6uction � 1000�000 1,500,000 �2,500000
Tofal Ezpenditures:� � - 7,200,000� 1,800,000 - .3,000,000
GreMC/ONer Sources: Grant funding is�unsecured.. - - � . . �
67
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capita� Faci�ities P�an
SixYear CapiffiI Paeilkies Ptan,2012-20�7 ,_Special Revenue Fund
Projea Trtie: A Street NE Pedestrfan Improvements TIP.#; 44
Project Nor. Cplala � '
Project 7ype: Sidewalk Improvements (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager. TBD
Deseription:
This project mmpletes a pedestrian connec[ion between Dowrrtown Aubum and the Bth�St NE business disVicti This projed will improve
a pedesfian crossing at 3rd St NE„and construc[sidewalks/access ramps along the A St NE cortidor. . - �
Progress Summary: _
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
� Ttie�annual maintenanoe cost for this project is estimated to be$500.� � �
BudgBl:. � � . 2071 �YTDAetual 2012 77BUdget
. . ' Budget F�cpenditures Budget Balanee
AdoPtetl Budget _ . . - ' ' r—_ _ '.. — _
Budget AmarMments .
Adjusted Budget • - - . -
� AC�V�ty: . . � . . _
� . 2011 YE . 2012 Year End
. . FundingSourees: �Prforto2071 Esdmate - 2072Bud et -� 2073Bud et ProeetTOtel
� Unresbicted SVeet Ravenue - - -� � -
� Grants(Fed.Sfate,Locaq - - - - -
REEf - ' - ` � -
' PYVTFL - • -� _ � _
Olher
� Totel FunAing Sources: � _ ._ - _ - . . ' . _
�Capital Eapenditures: . . .
� � Design - . . _. _
" . . R/ght of WeY ' ' ' � ' '
�Construction '
' _� Total Expendltures: - - , - . - . .
Forecasted Projed Cost:
.. .. -7otal
� • 2014 2015 20�6 2017 .2012-2017 .
Funding Sourees: - .- . .
. . . � �Unrestritfed Street Revenue - - - • -
GranGS(Fed,Stete.Loeaq - 150,000 - •� - 150,000.
.. . REET - • - - � .-
� PWTFL - . . � . ._
Othei
Total Fund�ng Soureea: - 750,000 " -� - • � 150,000 �
Capltal�Fxpenditures: � ' ,
_ Desyn - 15,000 - - 15,000
Righto{Way - - - -
. Construction 735,000 �135000 �
Total F�cpanEiNres: - 150.000 - . � 750.000 ��.
Grdnts/Otlier Sources: Grarrt tunding is unsawred. � �
68
City ofAuburn Capitql Facilities Plan
--- _
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap�ta� Fae�rties e�ari
Six-Year Capifal Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 -Speelal Revenue Fund
Project Trtle: IrMerurban Trailhead Irtiprovements - TIP# 45
RrojectNo: cp7ooa
Projea 7ype: Class 1 Trail (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager: . TBD
Deseriptfon:
This project proVides�.funding for enhancemeMS to existing trailheadsand construdion of new.trailheads. Improvements include bike
racks,kiosks, parkinq and access. • � � • �
Progress Summary:
Puture Impad on Operating Budget: '
This project will have no�impact on the aperatlng budge}for street maintenance.
Budget: zott rronccuai zot2 iieudgei
� 'Budgat F�cpendHures � Budgat Balenee
Adopted Budget - - - -
Budget Amendmants
AdJusted.Butlget - - - - �
ActiVlty:
zott ire zo�z rear ena
Fu�e��g sowees: vrtorco zo» esc�mace zo��s�d 2ois s�a ee eecTOrai
Unres6ieted Sfreef Revenue � - -- � _ - _ -
Grenfs(Fed,Sfete.Locef) ' - - - -
Tralhc Mifigatiun Fees ' ' ' ' '
pyyTF'L ' ' ' ' '
OMer
Total Fumling Sourees: ' ' ' • -
Cepifal Expenditurea:
p9sig^ ' ' ' ' '
� RightolWey - - . _ _ _
ConsWCfion
Tofai Expendkures: . . . . . .
Foreeasted Project Cost:
rom�.
' 2014 2075 2018 2077 2012-2017
Funding Sourees: � .
Unrestr7Ued St`aet Revenue - - - - _
Giants(Fed,Sfele.lttal) - 210,000 - - 210,000
TraRk MNigation Faes • - . _ _ _
P4V1FL - - • - -
OMer
Total Funding Sources: - - 270.000 � - � � - 270,000
Capifal E�endYdues: � . .
Design - 20,000 � - - 20,000
Right o/Way • - - - -
. Conshuction 190000 � 190,000
Totel Expendkures: - 210,OU0 � . - 210,000�
Grants/Ofher Sources: Grant funding ia unsecured. .
69
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) . . capita�Facn�ties P�an
Six Year Capital Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Tine: 104th Ave SE 8 Green River Road Study TIP # 46
Project No: cpx�ooc
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Intersection Safety)
Projea Manager. Seth�ckstrom LOS Comdor ID#24
Deserlptfon:
This project�will fund a pre-design study to determine the right of way,environmeMal and construction requiremants for intersection�
safety improvements.This safety project scope will includa sight distance improvements,constructing turn lanes,channelizetion, .
environmentab:mltigation,signage and clear zone improvements. �
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: —
This projed will have no impad on the operating budget for streat maintenance. . . .
BudgBt: � � 2olt YTD Aetwl 20t2 � t1 Butlget
• . ' Budget F�cpendkures Budget Balance__ . .
... : . � Adopfed Budgef _ . . � . " . . �
� Budget Amendments -
� AdJustetl Budget - - - -
AetlVlly:
2011 YE 20t2 Year EiiA
� Funding Sources: Pdor W 2011 Estimate 2012 Bud 2015 Bu �-' �-Total
� 'UnresMctetl Street Revenue - - 2,000 3,000 - . . - -5,000 '
Grenls(Fed.SYate.loce�l - - - �- � -
rrFET - - - - -
Pw�� - - - - -
Ofher
' - Total Fundinp Sourcas: - 2,000 �� J.OUO - - � . 5,000
� CapMal Expandltu�es: . .
Deslgn - 2,000 3,000 - S,WO �
R'ghtolWaY - ' ' ' '
Conshucfion�
��. �Total Ezpanditures: - 2,000 �� 3,000 ,� . �- 5,000
Forecasted Pmject Cost:
Tofal
� 2076 2075 2016 . 2017 2012-2077' �
� . . ' . . Funding Sources: � - --- . ...- -- —- -
Umesfricted Straet Revenue - - � - - � 3,000
. GiaMS(Fed.Stata.Locel) . - � ._ ._
� R� � - ' - - � � -
�PWTFL - - - . _ .
Other
� � Tofal Funding Sourees: - - . . �. � � 3,OU0�
Capital Fxpendidues:
. . . .Destgn ' - ' ' 3.000
' RgM o/WaY - ' - - '
Construction
Total Expenditurea: • ' ' • 3,000
GrenffiLO1herSources: � -� . �
��
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
'ARTERIAL STREET FUND (702) " - Capita�Facili£ies:Ptan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: ITS Dynamic Me.ssege Signs TIP # 50
Project No: cp�ooa
Project Type: Non-Capacity(RS)
Project Manager: TBD
Description: ,
Tfiis project will fund the design and construdion of Dynamic�Messaga signs at vanous locations throughout the city. Dynamic message�
signs are an important tool in ITS for infortning roadway users..Prioriry.locations for sign�installations are based on the Comprehensive
Transportation Plans ITS map and inctude Aubum Way N;Aubum Way S,W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Rd.
Progress Summary:
The first phase of this projecYisscheduled to begin in 2014 or sooneF'rf gran;fimding becomes available.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
The annuai maintenance cast for this projed is estimated W be$5000.
Budget: 40t1 YTDAetual 70t2 tlBudgat`
� BudOet� 'Expenditures . Budget Balarme .
� Adopted Budget - . - - - • �
Budget AmendmeMS -
Ad%u§ted 8udget _- - - - �
AcUvlty:
. .2011 YE � 2012 Year End
Fundi�Soureea: Prlor to 2071 EsNmate 2012 Bud . 2013 Bud P 'eet Total
UnreshYCfed Sfreet Revenue � . _ .. _ _ � .
Grents(Fed.State,Locall - ' - - -
�REET � _ _ ' '
PYYTFL - - • - -
Other
Total Funding Soureea: - - - - - -
Capitel Expenditures: . .
Design ' ' - - -
RipM of.WeY ' _ ' ' ' .
ConstrucNon
Total Expendilurea: - - - - _
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
Tofal
2014 .2075 2016 2017 2072-2017
. Funding Sourtes: � - _. �
UnresMctedStreetRevenua 30,000 �- 30,000 - 60,000
' Grants(Fed,Stete,LocelJ - 190,000 - 190,000 - 380,000
REET ' _ ' ' '
.P4YTFL - -� . - � - - �
Ofher
'. Total Funding Sourees: �� 220.000 �- � 220,000 . - 440,000
Capilal Expa'Mitures: �
. Design � 20,000 - 20,000 • 40,000
RightWWay - - -� -
Construction 200 000 'Z(10,000 400 OUO
Total ExpendiWres: ' 220,000 - " - 220,000 - 440,000 .
' '-Grenb/OMer Sourcea: GraM Tunding is�unsecured: -- - ' �
71
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) • cePrta�Fao���nes P�a�
Six Year Capital Facitities Plan,2012-2017 Speeial Revenue'Fund
Projea Title: AAary Olson Farm Improvemerrts 71P# 55
Project No: Cp0815
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projea nnanager. LeaH Dunsdon
Desqipticn:
This is a�historical preservation project required as mitigation for S 277th Reconstruction Projad. � � �
Progress Summary:
Phase 1 was the S.277th St Reconstrudion Projed. Phase II of the project was completed in 2009 and Phase 3 is
scheduled to be completed in 2011.
Future impaet on Opereting Budget:
This project willhave no impact on the�.operating budget for street maintenance. � �
Budgetr zo�� rruaswai zots tt suaaei
e�dg�c �ax��s e�aaot eeieo�_
. . . .. Adoptetl Budget - - - . �. _ _ - —--- - - -
Budget Amendments � - ' �
- Adjuffied Btidget - - - . -
�IVI�:
' � 20N YE �2012 Vear EnA '
. � Funding Sources: � Prior to 2011. EstFinate 2072 BuC et. ZD13 Bud et�. Pro eet Tolal .
UnrestrictedStraetRevenue �65,100 20;000 �1�,000 � � -. ' " -�06,100
Gran4s(FederaQ - ' - - - � � -
�T - - • -
P4VTFL ' ' ' '
� Olher
7ota1 Funding Sources: 85,100 20,OD0 1,000 • - 706.100
CapHal ExpeMitures: .
. Desi9n - ' - - .-
Rghto/Way - - - - � -
, ConsWction 85100 20;000 1000
Total ExpeMitures: 85,700 20,000 1,000 �� - �
- ----- �----- .
Foreeasted Projeet Cost: - - — ' �
. rosai
. . .. 2074 2015 2016 2017 .2012,2017. : � �
� . funtling Sources: . : . . . .- � ---�--
Unrestricled Street Revenue - - - - � 1,000
Grants(Fede(aQ • - - - .-
ReET - - -
PWTFL ' ' ' � ' ' .
� " . Other . .
TofalFundingSouroes: - ' ' - - - =-- - . - � �.1.000
Capifal Expendi[mea: . . . .
. � D?siS� - - - - '
RigM oI Way - - - - -
Construction 1 000 .
� � . ToTal Expenditurcs: - - . . - 7,000
Grants/ONer Sources:. Federal grent is FHWA Mitlgatlon Funds$101 K reeeived in prior years. � �
�2
City of Auburn'Capital Facilities Plan
ARTERIAC STREET FUND (102) Cepitai Fadlktes P1an
Six Year Capital FadliEfes Plan,'2012-2017 • Special Revenue Fund
Projed TiUe: Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements SIP# 58
Project Na cpX)00C
Project Type: Non-Motorized
Project Manager. TBD LOS Comdor ID#19
Descriptlon: --- - — - --
This proJect will construct pedestrian improvements along tha south side of SE 312th�St east of the intersection wRh 124th AveBE;
intersection improvemeMS at�t t6th�Ave SE 8 SE 304th St,pairrt bike Ianes on 116th Ave SE between SE�312th St and SE 304th St and
. . . . . .... . . . . _ . . _.
improve wrb ramps adjaceM to Rainier Middle School.r°� � �
Progress Summary:
The City was awarded $398,500 in federal funding'in May 2011,which consists of$75,700 for School District
educatloNencouregement,$1.800 for Police Dept:enforcement and$321,000 for engineering, right of way,and construction.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget
This proJed will have.no impaG on the operating tiudget far sVeet maiMenance.
Budget: 2oti YTDAewai zotz ��eudget
. . BudBet Ezpendriurea BuAget Balanee�
AdcAted 8ud9et ' - � - -
Budget AmerMments . - - -- - -
AdJusfed Budget� " ? �. . ' . ' '
A�:tivity:
(Previous Vm) 2071.YE 2012 Year 6�d
Funding Sourcea: �Priorto 2011 EstimaLO.� 2012 B at. 2073 B et � Pm Total
� UnresMaetl�SVeetRevenue - � - - -
Gren4(Fed.SYete,Locaq - �25,000 373,500 - :398,500�
TraAlclmpaAFees . � - ' � - - -
REET2,.. - - - - - -
ONer
Total Funding Sourpa: . � - 25,000 379,5U0 - 398,500
Capltal ExpendiWres:
Deslgn - 25.000 - - 25,000 �
Right ot Way - • - -
Constructlon 373500 � 373500
Total ExpendiWrea: � • 25,000 373,500 - 398.500
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
Total
� 2014 . .2075 _ 2076 2017 2012-�17__. .
Funding Sourcea: .
Unreshfcted S6aef Revenua ' ' ' ' '
Grents(Fed,Sfate.Locaq - �- - - 373,500 �
Tralfit ITpeet Fee3 " - �' ' '�
REE72 . � � _ _ _.
Ofher
Tota�Funding Sourees: - • • - �375,500
CapMei.Expendilures:
. Desi9^ - - - - -
RfgM ol WaY - ' - - � -
" � Construcflon .373 500
� Total Expandilurea: � • " ' ' �' 375,500
, Grants/Other Sources: Grant funding ia unseeuretl: � ,
73
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2A
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJEGTS AND FINANCING
TRANSPORTATION - LOCAL STREET
TABLE T.2q . . .
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING � - . �
� LOCAL STREEf FUND �
� � 2012 2073 2014� 2015 2016 � 20'17 �� Total
�Caoackv Proieeta: �
No�re .
Non-Caoaciri Prolects:
, 1 loeal Street Improvement Program� � - � � - � � ,
Capital Costa 2,000,000 2.000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2.000,000 � 72,000,000�
Funding Souroes: � � �,� � � � � � -
� Cocal Street Fund . - - - - - -
Proparty Tax 2,000,000 . 2.000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 �2.000,000 12,000,000�
�Sales Tax . - �- - _ _ _ " .
Bond Proceeds - - - - - '� - '
UUliry Mitigation - - . - - . . - .
�
SUNIMARY: � . �
CAPRAL COSTS� .
. Capaeity ProjeGS - - - - - _ -
Non-0apadty Projec� ' .2,000,000 2.000,000� 2,000.000 2,000,000 �2.000,000- _:2.000,000—._12,000.000�-
- � Total Cosfs � 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 �2,000,000-- 2,000,000�--.12,000,000 �
. FUND�NG SOURCES: � �
Lodal SVeet Funtl - - - - - - -
, .Proparly Tax 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2.000,000 .2,000.000 12,OD0,000
�SalesTez � - - - - ` - . _� .. _ . . ,
. . . �BOnd Proceeds - - - - - _ _ �
- UUlity Mitlgation
'fotalFunding 2,000,000 �2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,OD0,000 .2,OOU,000 �72,000,000
74
Ciry ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
LOCAL STREET FUND (103) Capital Faeilkles Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilttles Plan,2012-2017 Special Revenue Funds
Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program
Project No: V8lious 17p#37
Froject Type: Non-Capaeity
Project Manager. WiCkstrom
Deseriptfon:
This program was created aftar passage of Proposition 1 on the November'04 bailot,setting the.Citys property tax levy limits and
creatlng a dedlcated loral street fund Wbe�used solelgfor local streat improvemenLS.Tha�program wili focus on the preservation of Iocal�
streets(unclass�ed streets)within the City of/Wbum. The work will include crack sealing,asphatt patching,pre-leveling,asphatt.
ovadays and roadway reconstruction. The property tax lery liftmay also be used to repay bonds should they be utilized ta funtl.this
Pro9ram. . _ , .
Progress Summary:
This program has successfully completed oveAays since 2005. In 2011 and 2012 the program will focus on major street
reconstructlon where street surfaces and the undedying base has failed.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
None
BudgBt: 2017� YTDAetual �12 1tBUdget
Budget . F�enEiNres ' Budget Baienee
Adopted Budgef ' ' ' '
Budget AmeMmerMS� � �
� Adjusted Budget - . - _
ActiViq/:
� (Previoua YB) 2017 YE� 2012.Yeer End
Funding Sou'ees: � Pdor�W 2011 EsUmata 2012 Bud et . 2073 Bud ed Total
Loeal.SheetFund - � - - - .. . _
. PropertyTar , - 3,398,220 ' 2.000,000 2,000,000 5,398,?20
UtlOty MlttgaGOn ' ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds. - - • - - �
Other
Total Funding Soureas: . - 0,998,220 2,000.000- 2,000,000 5,398,220
Capital E�endttures: '
Dasfgn . - 120,000 180,000 180,000 300,000
Righfo/Wey - - - .
ConsWefion . 3 78 220 � 820 000 � 1 820 000 5 098 220
ToSal Expendkures: - 3,798,220 2,000,000 2,000.000 5,398,220
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
.2014 2015 2018 2077 2012-2017
FunAing Sources:
Locel Stroet Fund - - - -
PropertyTex , 2.000.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 12,000,000
Utll(ry Mitlgation - � ' • ' -
Bontl Woceetls ' ' ' -
Other
� Total Funding Sources: 2,000.000 2,000,000 2,000,000 2,000,000 A2,000,000 �
Capifel Expendilures:�.
Design 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 1,080,000
Right of Wey � - - - -
Construetion 1 820 000 . 1 820 000 1 620 000 1,820,000 10 920 000.
Total Expenditwes: 2,000,000 2,OU0,000 2,000.000. - 2,000,000 12,000,000
Grents/Other Sources: - . -
75
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T-2B �
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING '
TRANSPORTATION - STREET PRESERVATION
2012 2073 2014 2075 2076 .2017 Total
CaoadN Prolects:
None
. Non-0aoaeltv Proleeis•
1 .Annuat.Arterial SVeet Preservadon �
Capital Costs 1,300,000 '1,300,000 �'1,400,000 '1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 '8,200,000
. Funding Sources:
Local Street Fund - - - - - -
. . Property Tax - - - - - - -
� . . UtlittyTax 1,300,000 '1,300,000 '1,400,000 1,400,000 1,400,000 '1,400,000 '8,200,000�
Bond Proceeds � - � �����
. 2 .Annual Artedal Creok SealProgram � .
� Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
' Funding Sources:
� UtiliryTax 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 , 200,000 7,200,000�
Bond Proceeds � � � �
SUMMARYC - �
CAPITAL COSTS � ..
.. � � Capaciry Projecls � - - - - - -
Non-CapaeiryProjects 1.500,000 ��.SOD.000 1.600.000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1�,600.000 .�9,400.000.
Total Costs 1,500,000 7-,500,000 �7,600,000 1,600.000 1,600,000 7,Bq0,000 -9,400,000
:FUNDING SOURCES: � - - �
Street Fund - - - - - - -
� � Property Tax - - - - - - � - -
� UtilityTax' . .��,500,000 �,500,000 '1,600.000 1,600.000 'I,600,000 1,600.000 9,400,000
� Bond Proceeds �
Total Funding '1,500,000 1,500,000 �1,600,000 'I,600.000 1,600,000 1,600,000 -9,4DO,ODO
76
,
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
STREET FUND (105) Capitai FaaiiYies Pian
Six Year Capital FaeilRies Ptan,2012-2017 - Speciaf Revenue Funds
Project 7ine: Arterial Street Preservation Program '
Projed No: cp�ooa TIP�135
Project Type: Annual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Seth wekstrom
DeseripUon: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various dassified streets citywide. These
projects may include ovedays, rebuilds,spot repairs,or a combination ot ttiese. This progFam is funded through a 1°h utility
tax that was adopted by Council in 2008.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfully complete annual patching and ovedayprojects citywide.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: � '
None
BudgBt: . 2011 1TD Aetual �2072 - . .. 17 Budgef
, Budget Expentlltures � Budget Balanee
Adopted Budgel ' . .' .' .'
- Budget AmerMmerrts '� - -
. - AdlustedBudgef ' - - ' � -
. ACtivily:
_ . . . (Previous vra) ,2017 YE 2072 Year EM
FunNrig Soureea: Vrior to 20N� Est6naEe 2012 B et 2013 Bu et 'eet Total
� �� Umeshfcted Street Revenue - . .- - - �-
propeRy Tax - .' ' - -
UtilltyTax - . -- - � 1,366,000 1,300,000 1.300,000 2.868,000
REET2 ' � - � - - - - -
Bard Pmceeds � � �
Total Funding Soureee: - 1,366,000 1,300,000 '7,300,DOU 2,868,000
- Capifal Expandltures: �
� Design � - 60,000 25,000� 25,000 85,000�
Rlghtol.WaY - .- ' ' _.
Conshuction 1308000� 1275000 �� 1275000� �2581000
Tofal ExpenAHures: . • 7;38&000 7,300,000 1,300,000 2,668,000
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
rosai
. . 2014 . 2015 2078 2017 2072-2017
Funding Sourc.es: - . . � . -
UnrestrYCteC Street Revenue - - - -� -
Property Tax . ' " ' _ �
� UtllltyTax � 1,400,000 '1,400,000 1,4pp,p00 1,400,000 8,200,000
REETZ ' _ ' . _ -.
�Bond Proceeds � '�
TMaI Funding Souroea: � 7,400,000 - 1,400,000 7,400,000 1,400,000 8,200,000
capua��Penata,rea:
�s� so.000 so,ouo so,000 so,000 zso,aoo
Right ol WaY - - ' - - ,
ConsWCtion � 1 350 000 . 1 350 000 1 350 000 � 1 350 000 7 950 000
Totel ExpendiWrea: 1,400,000- � 1,400,000� - 1,400,000 1,400,000 &�.000
�Grants I Other Sources: '� •
��
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STREET FUND (105) Caqital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilkfes Plan,2012-2017 Special;Reveeue Funds.
Projea Titie: Arterial Crack Seal Program
Projed No: cp�000� TIP#36
Project 7ype: Mnual, Non-Capacity
Project Manager. SEth�ckstrom , ,
Desaiption:
Impleinerrt regular maintenance of various dass�ed.streets by sealingnewly formed cracks. Sealing the cracks will prolong the life of �.
the pavement by stopping water from draining into the subbase of the road. . � � �
, ._ . . ..- �� --- - �
Progress Summary:
Program continues to successfuily extend pavement life pavement citywide. �. , i
Future Impaot on OperaUng Budget:
None - � - � . '
. BUdg2t[.. . 2011 YTDAdual 201Y �7�BUdgef ��
' � Butlget Ezpentlitures Budget. Bala�e:_ ,
• AdoptedBudget - - �- -
. . Budpet Amendmerrts
� � Adjusted Budgat - ' .. - - � -
Adivity: .
ca��o�rB> zo++re 2012 Year End
� Funding Sourees: Prior to 2011 Estlmete 2012 Bud et 2073 Bud et - eet Tot61
. � �UnrestnctedStreetRevenue - - � - - . -- ----- ._
� - �� � Ulil'rtyTex - 740,000 200,000 200,000 - 340,000
� REET - - . , _ - _ .
� BorM proeeeds
- . � . -_ -.. .:_ � _ _. .. .- .
ro�i F��a��so�.�: • �ao,000 zoo,000 mo,000 aao,000
CapiWl Expandltures:
� ' Dasign - 10,000 15,000 15,000 25,000
. . RigM oIWaY ' ' ' . . ._ '
Construction 130 000 . 185 000 � 185 000 ._. _ - 315 000
. Total Expenditures: • 740,000 200,000 ?A0,000 340,000 .
Fo_reeasted,ProJeet Cost: .
roa�
' 2014 2075 2018 207T -- .2012,2017..
Punding5ources: . � - � --�
UnresMaed Street Revenue - - - - -
UtllftyTax 200,000 200,000 20D,000 200,000 . 1,200,000
REET - ' .- .' -
BorM proceeds
� � Total Funding Sourees: 200,000 200,000 200.000 . 200,000 1,200,000
Capital ExpendiNres:
- Design � 15;000 15,000 �15,000 15,000 .90,000
� .RgM of WaY - - - ' -
Cons(rueBon 185,000 185 000 185 000 1&5 000 _-� 1 110 000
� �Total F�cpandltures: 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 � -- 1,200,000 .,
Grents/ONet Sourees: ��
�g
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE T�
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS
Pro ect 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
7 a SfnetNK:Phsae 7 �S 25,630 $ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ "25,830 $ 25,830 $� 25,830 $ 154,980 .
� �2 ISCeetNECorrldor - ' ' ' '. ' ' '
3 MSOaetGradeSepe�atbn - - 21.827 21,627 21.827 21,627 87,308
4 S Y7RMA WN ro 6reen Rlvel Bddge - 27,250 '27,250 _ 27,250 27,250 27,250 136,250.
5 A Street NW,�Phese Y ' , ' ' _ ' '
' S D Streat NW,37N ro 14fh ' . ' ' ' ' ' .'
� F Stnet SE,/M ro A WS � _ - - - 4.100 4.100 8200
g M Swet NE,E Alaln 10<M - - - - 1,500 1;500 3,000.
9 WeseValhyNwyonpro� - -� - - - - - . .
10 81hS6ssfNEYNdeNng ' '. ' ' ' ' _ '
N M+rwY68MSbsstNE ' ' ' ' ' ' '
72AUbumWayS6MS6setSEdnp. " ' ' ' ' ' '
13 ��/EVdleyHwyPedesWan . �
UndsrDSSt ' ' ' '. ' ' ' �
14 Aadamy DHrs MuMFUSe TM ' ' ' ' ' ' '
15 7NN Aw SE CorrMOr trnp W,me.1 '. ' ' ' ' ' '
78 f2lMAveSEConidorlmP.PliaseZ ' ' ' ' ' ' .'
7712tMAwSECarltlorlmpPhase7 '. . ' ' '. ' ' ' ,
18 SE 9YOM St CwNdor Imp ' ' ' ' ' ' _
19 Aubum Way S d R/verwe/x Irrbrse�tlon '
Imp . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '
20 �Nmnmmfa/Park RoadweY Spedy '. ' ' ' ' ' '
21 DoxmMwn ro Las Gow Non-Motorizad . �
ImPSWdY '. ' ' ' ' ' � '
jZ S 37QN St Weyda 6 Getl Anp SWdy . ' _ ' ' ' '
23 E�+uepMNl'��n - - 5,000 . 5,000 5,000 5,000 20.000
$4 37N St SE b R St SE Petl Conneotw ' ' ' ' ' ' '
ZS KaraeYWaYSWtly ' ' ' ' ' ' '
Zg AWS Fr St SE ro Hamlodr St SE - 9;300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 46,500
27 Aubum Way S CoMdorlmproramenb. .
Pheaa 1 ' ' ' ' ' . ' '
ZB Aubum WaY Corrldor 6np ". " ' ' " ' ' '
29 f5lfi Sf SW RxonaWetlon� ' ' ' " ' ' '
30 Aubum WeyWlst St NE 57pna(Imp . _ _ _ _ _ _
31 C Sbeet NW 6 Weat Maln S6sef - - - -. - - -
3p FSbsatSEd,IMStTral9eSlpnal 6,600 6,600 8,600 6,600 6,600 6�,600 39,600
33 <tst S6sef SE 6�A SY SE Acceas Sfudy - - - - ' - ' . .
74 Mnual BAdpe Lnproveina� ' - - ' ' - '.
35 S.377M wotlaiW M/tlgallon � - - - � - - - -.
38 Gry'witls Ped»Man Gnsa7n0 ' ' .' ' ' ' '
37 CIywICS BIeYUe 6 Salsb 6nP ' ' ' ' ' ' '
38 ����1 Cross/n0 S+�e6'�++P ' ' - ' ' 5,000 5.000
39 AStMEPedesefanlmP - - - - 500 500 1,000
qp /rRaurban iralthead MW ' ' - - ' - -
41 100N Aw SE 6 Grean RMr Rtl Soutly _ _ . _ _ _ _ �
qy ITSDynamlcNessapeSlgns _ - ._ _ - 5,000 5,000
q3.IIIery Oben Farm Improremente ' ' ' ' ' ' '
44 Lae Fllll Petl fmprovemarHa ' " ' " ' ' '
qs�Loea/SVeet Improvemem Prtpram(FwM
109) .' _ ' ' ' ' '
q6 Mnual ArteAal Streat Pmservetlon (Funtl
f051 . ' ' ' ' ' ' -
47 Annwl ArtarVal Cradc See/Program(FurM
706) ' '
Total S �32.430 -S 66.960 S 95,607 E 55.807 S 701.907 S 711.907 S 506.838
79
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities'Plan
� ��-:-��. � ��
,,.��.
CITY OF �� .,_�-�°�� r f� , �-N°�- �
"""°� - - .�`�,"".� .�"`
�,..� �,,,,
' �m.. "'�./'y . .
� �+ �.......�. ` O .
nt'..... ....✓+��`° '�r�.e .w°' y°
�r
I �p'�
.�+"��
T j _,....,,���� �' . ,
.�� !`•,.--.a..:-'_^-°''r '
�k MORE THAN Y4U IMAGINED
g�
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER
Curcent Facilities
The City of Aubum water utility provides water supply; ,treatment, Vansmission, storage,
disfibution, �and service connections to in-City residences and businesses. The City also . ,
provides water to one adjacent city and one water district The water system consists of wells
and springs..for source, chlorination stafions and aeration for treatrnent, pump stations and
pipelines for transmission, and steel and concrete enclosed resenroirs for;storage. Table W-1;
"Facilkies Inventory', lists the facilities along with their currenf capacities and appro�timate
locations.
Level of Service (LOS)
The City's Comprehensiye Wate� Plan §ummarizes the design criteria for 4he City's water
distribution sys4em.. .
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The City _of Aubum's water system anticipates five capacity projects in the amount of
,-.-
$5,053,000, twenty-one non-capacity projects totaling $23,892;500 and long=temi debt totaling
$6,907,85U for a 6-year planning expectation total of$38,587;100. The financing plan is shown
in Table W-2 followed by individuai worksheets showing the projecYdetails.
The capacity projects will increase water supply quantities,.storage, and distribution for growth
of retail customers. The non-capacity projects will proVide for pipelirie improvements and
replacements, delivery pressure improvements, water quality enhancements, comprehensive
and resource managemenY planning, pump station upgrade§, teiemetry system improvements,
and meter upgrades.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
As Table W-3 shows, operating budge4 impacts of $6,000 are forecasted for water suppiy and
distribution facilities during the six years 2013—2018.
81
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-1
Facilities Inventory
Water Facilities
• " ,.:=,���Y�`�CIT�Y,:OF AUBURN:WATER`SYSTEM-- ---_, �� f_ .=wy:=_�.:��_'
���ru_.. ___;:,�:.{ �.
CAPAGITY' _ ____ _ .
FACILITY WATER RIGHT MGD-max rate) LOCATION
r :
Coaf Creek Sprrngs � Certircate 857 9.70�2.52>` 3401 SYuck River Rd,
West Hill'Springs�� Claim(1973 File Date) 0.9 � .1900 15M St NW Ext �
We111 CeRMcate 3560-A 3.17 1136 M St SE �
Well 2 G1-00277 C - 3.46 1109 5th St NE '
We113A G1-23629 C 4:03 40137(h St SE
�� WBII 3B (InGuded Above) (Inciuded AboveJ 401 37M.5t SE -
Wel14 � G1-20391 C �4:03 95025th.StSE
Well 5 G1-23633 C 1.44 5530 James Ava SE
� WBII 5A (Included Above) (IncWded Above) 5401�Olive Way SE
� - Well 56 (Induded Above) . (lncluded Abovef West end o/62nd GY SE �
Well6 ' - (SupplemeMal to Wetls 1, 2, 3A;3B,4) 5.04�(supp/emerrtal) 1109 Sth�St NE� -
Well 7 � (SupplemeMal to Wells 1:2. 3A.38,4) 5.04(supplemeMal) 405 E St NE� �
Supply7ofal(MGDJ 26.73
Available for Use 24.21
Derrotes detluction oi 1,750 gpm(Qi2,824 ao-Rlyr)to compty with ihe provisions of the Mucklest�oM-Aubum Stipula[ed Agreemerrt. -
CAPACITY - — —
FACILITX MG) LOCATION SERVICE AREA. .::,.
tora e Facilities: _ -- —
Valley Reservoir 1 5.0 2003 Aubum Way S Valley Servlce Area
Valley Reservoir 2.� 3.6 32115 105th�Pfaca S Valley Servlce Area �
. Cedemy Reservoir 8A ' 1.0 5002 Aubum Way S Academy;Sarylce Area
cademyReservoir 88 . 1.5 , . 5002 Aubum Way S Academy Service Area.
Lea Hill Reservar 4A 1.0 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill SeMce Area
- Lee Hill Reservoir 4B� � 1.5 30502 132nd A4e SE- Lea Hlll Serv/ce Area
�Lakeland Hills ReSeRroir�5 1.0 1118 57th P/ace SE Lekeland Hllls Svc Area "
Storage Tofal(MG) 14.6
82
Ciry ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-1 (eontinued)
Facilities Inventory
Water Facilities
CAPACITY
FACILITY (GPIN) LOCATION
BoasterPum Stations: ' '
cademy 1: 2 pumps 800 2004 Aubum WayS
cademy 2: 2 pumps 1,500 2004 Aubum way S
Green River: 4 pumps a,68o 29621 Green River Rd SE �
Intertie: 7 pumps 4,830 30502 132nd Ave SE
Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2;100 10406 Lea.Hill Rd SE
Lakeland Hills: 6 pumps 3;200 1118 57th P/ece SE
Jannsen's AddiNon: 1 pump 100 6107 35th Way SE
Wildemess Game Farm Pk: 2 pumps �,050 2401 Stuck R;ver Rd
CAPACITY
Primary Valve
FACILITY PSI -InletlOuUet LOCATION
P u Reuin ttin '-
Serves Valley Pressure Zorte:
HowardRoadCCF.#J011-1 82/65 HowardRd
Howard Road CCF By-Pass#101.1-2 - -Howard Rd(Bypass)
25th Straet SE#1110-1 (Oftline) - 25th St SE&K St SE
Rivenva/k#1111-2 90/50 27th SY. SE B 27th Place SE
Rivenva/k#1111-J 109/55 Rivenvalk Or SE 8 Howard Rd
Serves Lea Hill:
Lea Hill#512-1 80/50 304th St. SE West of 112th Ave
Lea Hill#412-1 90/45 SE 298th Place 8 109 Ave SE
Lea Hill#512-2 87/45 304th St. SEWest o/108th Ave
Lea Hill#61?-1 165/65 Lea Hill Rd SE
Lea Hill#61 f-2 140/65 Lea Hill Rd 8 106 Pl
Lea HiII#611-3 145/60 Lea Hil1 Rd& 107P1
Lea Hill#411-1 94/55 104th Ave SE(South of 303rd Road)
Lea Hill#411-2 8fi/40 •SE 304th PI&SE 10fst Place
Lea Hil!#512-3 WC 300&ock 8 108th Ave SE
Amber View North#711-1 150/65 105th P/SE&320th Pl
Amber View North#711-2 142/60 106th PI SE Near Reservoi�2 �
Serves Academy:
Aubum Way South#1011-3 ' 130/80 2003 Aubum Way S
Aubum Way South#1144-1 130/80 4500 Aubum Way S �
Ser►+es Jannsen Additiont �
' Jannsen#1216-1 72/58 6100 Block&35th Wa SE
83
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
ra�e�w-� ��oMi��ad�
Facilities Inventory
Water Facilities
_ CAPACITY
Primary Valve
FACILITY (FSI -InIeUOutlet LOCATION
Serves Lake/and Hillr.
Lakeland Hills#1410-2 125/62 Nathan Ave 8 Highland Dr
Lakeland Hills#1309-1 105/55 Mill Pond Dr� Orave�Rd
Lake/and Hills#1410-1 WC 51st St. SE east of Mill Pond Loop •
Lake/and Hills#1409-3 8M55 Mill Pond Dr&Lakeland Hi11s Way
Lake/and Hrlls#1510-1 WC Lakeland Hills Way&Evergreen Way
Lakeland Hll/s#1409-2 120/56 47th SE B Lakeland HfllsWay '
Lakeland Hills#1310-1 130/55 Mili Pond Dr&Mill Pond Loop
Lakeland Hills#1410-3 82/55 QuincyAve N of 53rd'St:SE
Lakeland Hills#1409-1 N/C OraveYc&Lakeland Hilfs Way
Lakeland Hills#1409-4 95l10 Lakeland Hills Way 8 Lakeland H(lls Lp
Lakeland Hills#1410-4 103/50 4900 Block 8 Mill Pond Dr
Lakeland H!lIs#1509-1 174/60 Terrece View Lower(6170)
Lakeland Hills#1509-2 160l73 Terrace View Middle(5960)
Lakeland Hills#1509-3 13&/47 Terrace View,Upper(5810)
Leke/and Hills#1509-4 230/70 Temace View&Alexander P/ace SE
N!C-Normal Closed �
caaac�nr
FACILITY (GPM LOCATION_
TreafineM: -
Howaiii Road CCTF 5,250 2101 Howard Rd SE
Fulmer Field CCTF 9;900 1113 5th St NE
� hlonn ti n ations:
Coal Creek.Spnngs Shatlon 2,400(graviry feed) 3401 Stuck Rive�Rd
West Hill SpringsStation 625(graviry feed) 1900 15th SY NW
Welb4 2,600 95025ihStSE
Wel!5B ' 600 1100 63rd St SE
Well SA 180 5401 Olive Ave SE
, t ! _'iw`_,�:�..�:�_`..;�BRAUNWO�D'SATQ:LITE'.WATER"SYSTEM..����..��.*_„,."�`�'„:,,.�,,�"";:�"~
FACILITY- - CAPACITY LOCATION_ _�___ _ .
W r .
Braunwood Satel/lte#1 0.03 MGD 4501 47th St SE
"'!es -_ .
Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MG 4501 47th St SE ,
BoosterPum Stations: �
Braunwood.•3 Pumps 2.0 GPM 4501 47th St SE
84
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-2
CAPITAL FAGILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
WATER DIVISION �
201T. 2013 2014 . .2015 2016 2017 Total
CaoadN Pmieets: � . . -
1 Lea Hill Booster Pump Statton
Capital Costs - - - 100,000 100,000. . - . 200,000
Funding�Sources .
Water Fund - - - . 100,000 100,000. - . . 200,000
. . Bond Proceeds - � ���
2 We1111mprovemenffi �
Capital Costs .. 1,680;000 ,1,415,000 - . - . - � - � 3,�5,000
Funding Sources: . - .
WatarFund 1,880;000 �1,415,D00 - � - - - 3,295,000
Bond Procaeds� � - _ -�
� 3 Green Rhrer PS Emergency Power . �
Capitai Costs - . - 40�,000 . - . . . � -� 400,000
Funding Sources: ,
WffierFund - � - 400,000 - - - 400,000 �
Bond Procaeds� - � _
4 IMeRie Infrastructure
Capital Costs 503,000 . .- . - _ . .. - , - 503,000
Funding Sources: .
WaterFund �503.000 - - . , - - 503,000
Bond.Procaeds � �
5 Annual�Dlstributlon Improvements �
Capital Costs � . - - _ . 123,000 727,000 131,000� 135,000 . 139,000 _ .655,000
Funding Sources:
WatarFund �- 123,000 127,000 131,000 135,000 139,000 � 655,000 �
Bond Proceeds - -
SubWtal.Caoaeiri Profeets: � .
Capital�Costs 2,363,000 1,538,000 527,000 ..231,000 :235,000 '" 139,000� � � 5,043,OQ0
Non-CaoaelN Proleees: �
6 Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6
Capital Cos1s 100,000 - - - - - 100,000
FunCing Sourcas:
WaterFUntl 100,000. � � - - - - - 700,000
Bond Proceeds '� � �
, 7 Well InapecGon arM RedevelopmeM Program � � � '
. Capital Cosfs . 350,000 360,000 371,000 382,000 .394,000 1,857,000
. Funding Sources: � _ ,
WaterFund - � 350,000 360,000� 371,000 382,000 394,000 7,857,000'
Band Proceeds _
8 Water Repair 8 Replacemer�
. Capital Costs � - 1.350,000 150,000 2,960,000 2,050,000 3,142,000 9,652,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFund - 1,350,000 150,000 2,960,000 2,050,000 3,142,000 9,852,000
Bond Proceeds - _ �
85
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-2(eontinued)
2012 2013 2074 - �2015 2018 2017_. . Totsl
Non�anaeitv Proieds: . " - ----- - - �
9 �Lakeland HIIIa:BoosDer Pump StMion � .
Capital,Costs 77.000 - - - - - 77;000
Funding Sources � �
Water Fund - - - - - -- ' '
.Bontl Proceeds . 77,000 - - - � 77,000
10 Aeademy Booster Pump Station
Capital Costs 2,752.700 - - - . - 2,752,700
Funding Sources: � �� � �
. �WaterFund 2,752,700 -� - - - . - 2,752,700
�BOnd Procaeds . - - - � �
11 Cakeland Hills Reservoir PaiMing'
� � � �Capital Cosis - � 700,000 - - - - 700,000
Funding Sources: - � � � � �
� WaterFund� - 700,000 - - . - � �700,000
- �.Bond Proceeds . .
t2Comprehensl4eWaterPlan ' � �
� Capital Costs� . - - 100.000 - - - - 10D,000
Funding Sources: � �
�Water Fund - - 100.000 - - - 100,000
.Bond Proceeds -
13�We114 and InteNe Pump StaBon Improvements � .
� Capital Costs ' 100,000 6DO,D00 - - - . , � 700,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFund 10D,000 600,D00 - - , - . -� . 7U�,OOU
�BOnd Proceeds' -
� 14�Well 5 Upgtade � . . .
Capltal�.Costs �� - 1,7D0,000 � - - - - 1,700,000
Funding Sourcea: � � � ' � ' �
Water�Fund - 1,700,000 - - - - 1,700,000 -
BandProceeds
15`Well�7 Emergeney Power �
CapkaLCosb - 70,000 240,000 - - �, - 310,000
� � Funding Souroes: .
� � WaterFund � - 70,000 240,000 - - - 310,000
' Bond Proceeds ' �
�16 Maintenanoe and Operetlons Expansion . � .. . . --- �
- � �Capifal Costs - 300,000 - - - . � - 30D,000
Funding Saurces: �
� Water Pund •- 300,000 - - - - - 300,000
Bond Fruceeds -
� 17 MR.AAasterAAeters " - . .
� CapNal��Costs . 80;000� 400,000 - - � - � �� . 480,000
. Funding Sources: � �
� Water Fund 80,000 400,000 - - - - � 480,000
Bond Proceeds
86
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE W-2(continued)
2012 2073 2074 2015 2016 2017 Total
Non-CaoaeNv Proieels:
18 Straet UUlity ImprovemeMs
Capital CosLs 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200.000 200,000 1,100,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFund 100,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200;000 200,000 1,100,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
19 Wa�r Resources Protectlon Progwm -
Capital Costs 5,000 5,200 5,300 5,500 5,600 5,600 32,400
Funding Sources:
Water Fund 5,000 5,200 5,300 5,500 5;600 5,800 32,400
Bond Proceeds - - - _
20 Annual Reservoir Repair&Replacemerk Program
CapiNal CosLS 10,000 10,300 10,600 10,900 11,300 11,600 64,700
Funding Sources: -
WaterFund 10,OOD 10,300 10,600 „ 10,900 11,300 . t1,600 64,700
Bond Proceeds - - - -
21 SCADA Upgredes
Capital Costs 1.110.700 - - - - - 7.170,700
Funding Sources:
WaterFund 1,110,700 - - - - - 1,110,700
Bond Prbceeds - - - -
22 Fulmer Well Field ImpmvemeMS �
Capital Casts 800,000 .:�1,000,000 - - - - 1,800,000
Funding Souices: '
WaterFund BD0,000 1,000;000 - - - - 1,800,000
Bond Proceeds - - -
23 M Sdeet Grade Separatlon _ .
CapiWl Cosls 150,000 - - - - - 150,000
Funding Sources: -
Water Fund 150,000 - - - - - 750,000
Bond Proceeds � - �
24 Lea HIII PRV Sfation Improvemenffi
' Capital Costs SU,OOU 35D,000 - - - - 400,000
Funding Sources:
WaterFund 50,000 350,000 - - - 400,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
25 Dedud AAeter Replacame�rt Projed �
Capital Costs 50,000 250,000 - - - - 300,000
Punding Sources:
Water Fund 50,000 250,000 - - - - 300,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - - _
87
City ofAuburn CapitalFqcilities Plan
TABLE W-2(continued)
2012 2073 2074 2015 2016 2017 Sotal
Non-CaoaGlv Proiects:
26�A Street NW Corridor '
Capital Cosis 206,000 - - - - - 206,000
Funding Sources:
Waffir Fund 206,000 - - - - - 206,000
Bond Proceeds - - - -
Subtotal.NomCaoadlv Proieels:
Capital Costs 5,591,400 7,285,500 7,065,900 3,547,400 2,648,900 3,753,400 23,892,500
Lonadertn Debt
27 Water Long-term Debt
Long-tertn Debt 1,363,600 1,672.600 1,671,900 1,669,100 1,667,400 1,597,000 9,641.600
Funding Sources:
WaterFund 1.363,600 1,672,600 1,671,900 1,669,100 1,667,400 1,597,000 9,841,600
Bond Proceeds _ - _
� SubtoleL�LOna-Term Debt: � . .
Capitaf Costs 1,363,600 1,672,600 1,671,800 1,669,100 1,667,400 1,597,000 9,641,600
SUMMARY:
CAPRALCOSTS
Capaciry Projects 2,383,000 1,538,000 527,000 231,000 235,000 139,000 5,053,000
Non-Capadty Projects 5;591,400 7,285;500 1,065,900 3,547,400 2,648.900 3,753,400 23,892,500
Long-tertn Debt 1,363,600 1.672;600 1,671,900 1,669,100 1,667,400 1,597,000 _ .9,641,600
Total'Costs 9,338.000 10,496,700 3;264,800 5,447,500 4,551;300 5,489,400 38,567,700
FUNDING SOURCES:
WaterFund 9,261,000 10,496,100 3,264,800 5,447,500 4,551,300 5,489,400 38,510,100
Bond Proceeds 77.000 - - - - _77;000.
� � •� � Total Funding 9,338,000 10,496,100 3,264,600 3,447,500� 4,357,300 ,5,489,400 38,587,100
g$
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilkieS,Plan
SlxYear Capital FaeilRies Plan,2012-2017 ErKerpriseFuods
Project Tale: Lea Hill BPS Expansion 8� Rezone
Project No: cp0801
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager: TBD -
Descriptton:
Increase the pumping capacity and recanfigure the boosted mne to encompass add'Rional hydrarrts iri order to.provide adequate fire �
flow.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget
No sign�cant impac[. � �
Budget: 2ot� rruueaei. zo�z ttsuege�,
Budget ExpendiNres 8udget Balance
Adopted�Budget - � �- - -
Budgef Ame�merrts ' ' ' '
AdJusted Budgel - - - - -
Adivlty:
-.2011 YE 2012 Ye�End
� FunAing Sourees: , '. Prior M 2017 Estlmata 2012 Bud ._ 2013 Bud Pro' Total
UnresbiGedWeterRevenue " . " ' " ' - _ '
Giants(Fed.Stefe.Loceq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
Otlrer
Total�Fundirq�Sourees: � - - . - • -
� Cepifal Expanditures: �
Deslgn . - - - - -
Righto/Wey .. ' ' ' ' -
Cons6vctlon
Total ExpenAiNres: . : . ' . . ' ' ' '
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
Totel
. � � 2014 � . .2015. 2076 - 2017 2072-201Z. - .
Fundinp Sourcea: � ' '� .
UnresMeted�WeterRevenue . � - 100.000 100,000 - 200,000
Grents(Fed,SYete.Lxal) � - ' � - � - - .
Bond Proceeds - _ ' - -
OMei
. Total Funding Sourcea: - - 700,000 100,000 - ,ZD0.000
� � � Capifal Expendltu'es:
. .. . Design � - � �50.000 - - 50,000
RigM ol WeY � ' . - - ' '
ConstrucLon .50 000 100 000 150 000 �
. Total Expenditures: � - 700.000 100,000 �� - 200,000
Grams/Other Sourees: ' .
89
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
� WATERFUND (430) caphaf Faofii4�es eian
Six Year_Capital Faeilkfes PIan,2072-2017 Enterprise Funds
Projea Tine: Well 1 Improvements
Project No: cp0915
P..roject Type: Cep2City
Project Manager. Lee _ .
Descriptfon:
Hydrogeologic evaluation of existing weli conditions, rehabiiitation or re-drilling of the well bo maximum well produclion,and.construction�
of building imp�oyements to house chlorina disinfection equipment and an emergency generator. � � � � �
Progress Summary: -
_ Firturelmpaet on Operattng Budget: �
No sign'rficant impact.
Budget: zo�� vroaauai zo�s �i eueyei
a�a� �Penaiw�s suaAa� sa�
�Adopfed Budget - - • - _ � -- -
� Budget Nnendments
- Adjusfed Budget - - ' � '
AdNity:
2017 YE 2012 Yea�End
FunEing Sourees: -Priw to 20N .Estlmate 207Y Bud et .2073 Bud et_—. Pru eet7otal_. �
Unres6YCfedWaterRevenue 104,400 185.000 7,880,000' 1;415;000- --� 2169,400�
Grants(Fed.SYete.Locaq - - - - -
� � Bond Procaeds ' ' . ' ' '
Ofher -
Total Funding Sourcos: 104,400 785,000 1,880,OD0. 1',415,000 - -� S,'168,400
Capkel EzpendiWres: . .
Design 104,400 185,000 380;000 200,000 669,4U0
Rlght o/Wey - - - - _
Consbuction 1 500 000 1 215 000 . . 7 500 000 �
Total F�tpendiwre8: 104,400 785,000 1.880,000 1,475,000 � 2,169,400�
Forecasted Projeet Cost: •
Total
, 2014 2015 2018� _ 2017 2012�-2017
, ��� Funding Soureea: - . � � � . �
UnresWcted Weter Revenue - - - � - 3295,000
GreMS(Fed,Stete,LoceQ - - • • -
� Bond Proceeds - - - - -
OMer
� Total Funding Snurees: - - . . - ---. -� - --- 3,295,000
Capltal Ezpenditurea: � � .
- �3�9� - - ' � - �- 580�000 �
RigMWWay - - - - -
Cons6uction - - 2,715 000
Total Espenditures: - . ' - � 3.295,000 _
Grenb I Ottier Sources: - - - -
90
City of Auburn Capital Fpcilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) CapitalFaailkies Plan
Six Year Capital FacilRies Plan,2012,2017 Errterpdse Funds
Project rine: Green River PS Emergency Power
Project No: cp1000( � �
ProJea Type: Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Descrlption:
'.. Construdion of fadlity improvements to housa an emergency generator and assaciated elactrical equipment.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No sigN�cant.impact.
BUdgBt: � .2017 YTD Actual 2012 11 Budge! .
suaaee: exPe�wiwres e�daec eaia�ee
ndopred euager - - - -
BudgerAmantlmeirts.
�Ad%usted Budget� � --. . _ _ .
Aetivity:
201!YE . 2012 Ye�End
, Funding Sources: . . Priw to 2011 - Fstlmah 20�2 Bud t .2013 Bud et P Total
- UnrestriGed Water Revenue • � � ' - - • � - ' - ' '
� Grants(Fed:State.Loesl) . - � - . ' . - � • - �
BorM Proceeds � .. - ' . ' '
Other
Tolal funding Sourmd: � - - - -, � .
Capftal E�anditurea: , �
Design � � - -� - - -
Right ol weY . � - - - - -
Constructlon , � .
Total E�qre�itures: � . ' , - - '
Foreeasted Project CosC
Total
2074 � 2075� 2016 2017 2012-2077:. .
' Funding Sources: � � � � - -�
UnrestrlUed Water Revenue 400.000 - - - . 400,000 ' �
- GraMS(Fed,State,local) - - . _ _ .
BondProeeeda� - - � - - -
Ofher
� Total Funding Sourcas: " . - � .40a.000 . • - 400.000
' Capital ExpendiWres: � .
. .Design ' 80,000 " - - - 80,000
RigbtolWaY ' ' ' -
Consmictlon .320 000 320 000
.. Totel F�ryenditures:. . .. . 400.000� ' ' - 400.000
Grerrts/Other.Sources: ' - . -
91
City of Auburn Capital Fgcilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) caphai eawin�es Pian
Sfx Year Capital Facilities Plan,2D12-2017 Erherprise Funds
Project Tide: Intertie Infrastructure .
Project No: cp1103
Project Type: Capacity
Project Manager. Leah Dunsdon
DeseNptlon: - :
Construction of M!o�intertie infrastructures required for purchased water and for long term emargancy intarties.Cp1011 was completed �
� in2011�for the B Street NW Intertie. Cp1103 is for design and construdion of a secand intertie on 132nd Ave SE. � �
Brogress Surtimary:
Cp1011 was completed in2011 for the B Street NW Intertie. Cp1103 is
for design and construction of a second intertie on 132nd Ave SE.
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
' . �� No significant impact.
Budget: zo�� vrDnea,al zo�z ttBudeec
- Budget Expendiluras Builget Balariee
. . Adopted Budget - - - � -
�Audget AmerMments �
AdjustedBudget - - - " - -� '
ACtlVIh/:
2077 YE ' 2072 Yeer End
F�mding Sources: Prior to 2077� Eslimate 2012 Bud 2013 Bud at�_ Pm a�Total
UnrestnctedWaterRevenue 600,000 787,000 - 503,000 - 1,890,000 �
. � '�, Grants(Fed.State,Local) - - _ � _ - � - .
� Bond Roceeds - - � - - -
Other
Total PwMing Souraea: B00,000 787,000 SU3,U00 ' - 1,890,000
. Capifal Expandifuras: �
Design. 105,000 215,000 100,000 - , 420.000
ProperryACqWslflon - 400,000 - - 400,000
. CorrsWCtron 495,000 172,000 403000 1070000
Total ExpendiWres: 800.000 787,000 503,000 - " � - 1�,880,000
Foreeasted Project Cost: , — �
_
7We1
� 2014 2p15 2018 20'17 _2072-ZO'17
Funding Soureea: . .-. .- _ . _ _____ ___
Unrestricted�WaferRevenue - • � - - 503,000
� ' Grants(Fed.SYate.Locaq - - � - - , . �-
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' �.
OMer
� � �Total Funding Sourees: • - • � - . ' S03,000
Capital Ezpenditurea: � � �
� ' Deslgn - - . - . . t001000 �
PropeftyACqursiUon - ' - � ' . . '
Construetlon 403,000
Total ExpeMkwes: - - • - - � � 503.000
Grants I.ONer Sources: -
92
Ciry of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capna�paei�kies Plan
Six Year Capital FacilRfes Plan,2012-2017 .EMerpASe Funds
Project TiUe: Mnual Distribution Improvemetrts Program
Project No: Cp�000c
Projea Type: Capacity
Projed Manager. Various
Deseriptlon:
Distribution system improvements needed to support andcipated growth: Projects will be coordinated with the Local Street Progrsm and
other utility projects.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget: "
No sign�cant impact. � � . � �
Budget: 2ot1 vmaauai mt2 tteuaee�
,_ � � � sae9•e� . Expeoa�wres sad9oe ss�ance �
. .Adopted Budget ' � ' ' '
BudgetAmendmeMs
Ad/usted8udget , �- - - -
Aetivlty:
2017 YE 2012 Year Entl
' Funding Sourees:., . . '.`Pdor to 2011 � Eetimate .2012 Bud � 201 S Butl Pro eet Total�
UnresMcledWateiRevenfre � � 113,000 . - - - 123,000 113,000 �
- Grants(Fed,SYffie.Local) ' - - - - -
BaM Proceeds. ". - - - - -
OMer
Total Funtling So�uees: - 113,000 � �- - 123,000 173,000
CapMalErzpendkures: �
Desiqn� • � 26,000 - . -� 28,000 26,000
Rtghto/Way . - � . - - - _
Consfruction 87 000 � 95 000 87 000
� TohlFxpendiMes: ' ' � 113.000 " . - - 123.000 NS,000
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
Total
, ' 2014 . 2075 2016 2077 201Y-�017
Funding Soureas: � . - � - — -
UnresMctedWaterRevenue� 127,000'� 137,000� 135,000 � 739,000 655,000
Grents(Fed,State.locaq - -� - - -
Bond Proceeds ' -- - - . .
Olher
Total Funding Soureas: 127,000 131,000, 735,000 739,000 855,000 �
Capifal EzpendlWras: � � �
. Design 29,000 30,000 31,000 32,000 150,000
Right of Way . - � - - - � �
Cons6uction - 98 000 101 000 104 000 107 000 - 505 000
Total Expenditures: . 127,000 131,000 135,000 139,000 655,000
Grants/�OMerSourees: " � - �� �
93
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital Facillties Ptan
Slz Year Capifal Fac(Ikies Plan,2012-2017 E�iterpHSe Funds
Project Title: Lakeland HiIIs Reservoir 6
Project,No: cp1006 �
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projeot Manager. LEah Dundson
Desg�ipUon:
� Construct a second reservoir in Me Lakeland Hills area to maet peak hour and fire flow damand.
Progress Summary:
Future lmpad on Operating Budget:
� � ProjeG wlll require routinelinspections by water operations staff. The annual maiMenance cost is estimated.to tie approxima(ely$1,200.
. � Budget: 2011 Y7DAetual�- - 20�2. 7LBudget .-
� � � Budget Expendkures Butlget Balene'e
. qdopted gudget ' ' ' '
. Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget - - ' - . -
AetiVity:
'2011-YE � . 2014 Yeu EtM
� � Funding Sourees: Prlor W 2011 . Estlmale 2012 Bud�et ..�2013 Bu e! .Pro eet Total. .
� UnresWcted WeterRevenue ' � - . � .145,800 -�100;000-- � - _ -- � �— 245;800�
� Grents�(Fed�SYate.LOCeq . ' ' - -
� BorM Pioceeds 227,300 2,272,700 - - 2,SOO,ODO
OMer
Total FunAing Sourees: Y27,300 2,478,500 700,000 . - - -2,745,800
' CapMal Expendflures:
� Design 227.300 142.000 ' - - 869,300
Ripht o/Way - - - - -
� - ConsWdion 2276,500 . 100000 2376W0
� Total F�cpendituies: 227,300 $418.500 100.000 - 2,745.900
Forecasted Project Cost:
7oml
2014 2015 207B -2017 . 2072-201Z-
� . ' Funding Sourees: . � �
� Unreshicted�WaterRevenue - - -- . - 100,000
Grents.(Fed,Sfete:Lxal) - - - - . -
. Bond Proaseds - - - -
Otlrer
� � Total Funding Sourees: - - - • � 100,000
�� Capital Et�penditures: .
� ��9� - - - - -
RlghtolWaY - - - ' '
- �Conswdlon 100 000
romi�a�,.�: - . - . �oa000
GranS/OMer Sources:
94
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) ' Capital FaeiiiUesElan
, Sfx Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 _Enterprise Funds
Project Tiue: Well Inspection and RedevelopmeM Program
Project No: cpl000[
Project Type: Non-Capacity '
Project Manager. TBD
Description: -- -- -
Program.for inspection and redevelopment of supply wells and springs nacessary to ensure produdion at maximum capaciry for efficieM
utilization. . . .
Progress Summary:
Planned
Future Impad on Opereting BudgM:
None
BUdget: 2071 YTD Adual 2012 - 11 Budget
' - .Budget . E�ipenditures Butlget Balanee�
' .AdoptedBud9ef . - � �. . . - -
Budget Amendments - -
. . Adjusted.Budget . - . - � ' '
Activity:
, � 2011 YE 2012 Year End� ,
' Funding Sourees:�. . Prim to 2011 Estlmate . 2D12 Bud� � 2019 Bud et Pro eet Totel
- UnresMcted Wefer Revenue • - � - 350,000 -
G�aMS(Fed�Stete.Locel) ' - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - �
Other
Total Funding Sourees: •� • - 350,000 -
, CapHal Expentlitmes: . ..
- Design - - - 85,000 -
Rgbt o1 WaY - - - . � - -
� Constructlon 265 000
Total F�eridlLUes:. � � - . - . 350.000 -
Forewsted Project Cost: "
TMaI
. . . -4014 2015 2016 2077 2072-201T.
FundingSources: � � - .-- -- �- - � ' � -
UnrestrictedWaterRevenue - � . 360,000 371;000 382,000 . 394,000 1,857,000
Granta(Fed,Stafe.Locaq .' - - - - . . . �
BondProceeds � - - - . �- �
��Other� � �
TotelFUndingSources:�.- �� � �960,000 371,000 3ffi,000 384,000 " 1.857,000 .
Capital Expanditures: � - � .
Design 87,000 .90,000 93,000 96.000 451,000
Rghto/WeY , � � � - - � - - � - -
. Cons6uctlon . ��273 000 261 000 289,000 298 000 7 406 000
� Total Expentlkures: �� . . 360,000� 371.000 3ffi,000 394,000 1,857.000 � .
Grente/Other Sources: . � �. � �
95
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WA�R FUND (�0) CapifalFacilttles Plan
Six Year Capital FaciliUes Plan,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds
Project TIUe: Mnual'Distribution Repair& Replacements
Projed No: CpX)OD[
Project Type: Non-Capacity(R8R)
Projed Manager. Va�ious
Description:
Distribution system repair and replacement projects required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Projects will be
coordinated�.wkh the Local Street Program and other utility proJacts. �. � �
Progress Summary:
Firture Impact on Operatlng Budget:
No signifi_cant impact. �
Budget: zo�t vTnaawai - 2ot2 tteudgei
. � . . .. . Bud9et Expenditures.. Budget Balanee
. Adoptad Budget ' . ' ' ' -
, � Budget AmendmerRS �
Adjusted Budget . . _ -. � " ..
AetiVit�/: .
- (Predaua 2 Y's) 2017 YE 2012,Y08t EnE
, _ Funding Sourees:�. Prlor to 2017 Estlmate 2012 Bud 'eS 2013 Bud et... .Pro eot Total . -
UnresVktedWaterRevenue 1,076,700. - -� - - - �1;350,000� - ��—'-�1;076,700
GienGa(Fed,State.�oea�l - • - - - '
� BondP/viceeds� - - - - '
Ofher
Total Funding Sourees: 7,078,700 - � .- - -� 1,550,000� - ' -7;076,700
� Capifal Ezpendkurea: -
Design 215,300 - - 270,000 �215,300
� RightolWay - - - - � -
_ � Carstruction . 861,400 1080000 861600
Total Expenditures: 7.078,700 . - � 1.350,000 1.076.700
Forecasted PmJed Cost: - -
7otal
2014 2015� 2016 2017 . -2012-.2017
. - Funding Sourees: -� - - - - - -- - - - -- -
�UnrestrYCtedWaferRevenue 150,000 2,960,000 2,050,000 3,142,000 9,652,000
Grents(Fetl,Sta[e,looal/� - - �- � - . -
Bond Proceetls - - ' -
ONer
TotalFUndingSourees: 150,000 2,960,000 Z,U50,000� � :3;742,000� 9.852,000
Capltal F�pendilures:
' Desfgn 30,000 590,000 410,000 620,000 ��1,920,000
Rght o(Way - - - - - .
ConsWOtion 120 000 2 370 000 1 660 000 2 522 000 7 732 000�
� Total E�qienAiLJres:. 150,000 2.860.000 , 2,OSU.000 5,142,000 8.652.000
� Grartls/Other Sources: �
96
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) - Cepital Faeilities Piaq
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 EMe'pNse Funds_
Projec�7iUe: Lakeland Hills Booster Pump Stafion •
Project No: cp0909
Projea Type: Non-Capacity �
Projed Manager. Vond�ak ' .
Descriptlon:
Increase Me pump siation capacity to meet peak damands and fire flow requlrements and provide�emergency powec � • .
Progress Summary: �
Future ImpaM on Opera4ing Budget:
No siqn�cant Imoact - . �
. BUdgBt: - � 2011 YTD Aetual � 2012 11'BudgeL.
. . . '.Budgat F�endkures Budget Balanee. ...
Adopted Budget — -- - _ - _ � _
Budget AmerMmeMs
Ad/usted Budget - , - - .
ACtIVk�/:
2077:YE 2072 Year�Entl
� Funding Sourees � Prlor to 2017 Estimate� 2072 Bud et�.. _� 2073 Bud at Pro aet Tofat .
� � UnrestrrdedWaterRevenue ��� � - - - •
Grarrts(Fed,Sfafe�Loceq � � ' - . . _.
BondPmceetls ' � 479,000�. 2,168,000 77,000 - �2,724,000� �
Other
Total Funding Sourcea: . � � 479,000 2,188,000 77,000 - 2,M4,000
Capihl Expenditures:� ' .
. Design . 479,000 - - - 479,000
RigM ol Wey � - - - _ _.
Constructlon 2 168 000 77 000 2 245 D00
. Totel E�ndkuros: -- 479,000 � 2,188,000 77,000 - 2,726,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
� . 2014 2015 2018 20tt � 2012-2077
. Punamg sou.cea: � � . .
UnresMc[edWaferRevenue - - . - - _ _ � _
Grams IFed.Stare.LoeaQ - - _ . . ..
Bontl Pmceeda - ' - - 77,000
Offier
Total Punding Sources: - - ' ' . 77,000
CapHal Expenditu1es:.
DesiBn - - - • -
wyniawey - - - - -
co�swwono� n o00
roai��dm,�: - - - - . n.000
Grente/ONar Sources:
97
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) � capirai Faeunies eian
SIx Year Capital Faailities Plan,2012-2017 Enterydse Funds
Projec�7itle: Academy Booster Pump Station � .
Project Na cp0909
Project Type: Non-Capacity
ProjecfManager:- Vondrak ,
Description: -
�. A new Academy station will be wnstructed at.the Academy Reservolr site,to replace the Janssen's Addidanpump staUon,to�meet fire
flow demands and provide emergency pourer.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operatlng Budget: . '
No sipniFlcant Impact
BUdQ@t:. 2077 YTDAelual 2072 NBuOge[.
" Budgst Expe'MIWres� Budgat _� . .Beleneo_
� Adopted BWget � - . - -� - -- ---—- _
Budgef Amendments - � -
' Adjusted Budgel � - ' - ' .
Adivity:
� . 2017 YE 2012 Yeai End
" Funding Sourees: Pdor W 2011 .. Estimate 2012 Bud � 2013 Bud et- _:Pio 6et TotaL
Unresfncted Wafer Revenue � -_ - 700 � �2,752,700 � ��-�;=� � � �- 2,753;400
Grenfs(fred�Sfete�LOeeq ..- ' � - - � -
BorMProceeds � 241,000 367,000 - - . BO8,000
OMe�
' Total Funding Sources: � � 241�.000 � '367.700 2.752,700 - . '._ ..�361,400 �
Capihl Etcpendldnes: .
Deslgn 247,000 367,700 - - - 608.700
Right o/WaY - - - -� -
� � ConsWttlon 2 752 700. 2 752 700
Tofal ExpenAiNres: '� � 241.000 367.700 2,752.70D - � 3,361.400
, Forecasted ProJect Cost: � -
7otal .
. . 201d 20'IS 2018 � .2017 . _,2012•201Z�
� � �Funding Sourees: . . . ._ , __. . ._ --.
UnresbictedWaterRevenue - ' - - 2,752,700�
� Grerits(Fetl,SYa[e,lokeq - - ' � ' . - .
Bond Proeeetls - - -' � ' '
Ofher
Total.Funding�Sources: - . . -. � - Z.752.700
Capital E.�endkures: �
DesfBn - - - - . '
� Righf'olWeY - ' - - -�
Cons6vction .2 752 700
TotalErzPenditures: - . - � - -- - y,75p,700
Gran[s/Other Sources:
98
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capitaf Faeiikies Pian
Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Er�terprise Funds
Projea Title: Lakeland Hilis Resenroir Painting
Project No: cp�ooac.
Project 7ype: Non-Gapacity
Projed Manager. TBD
Descriptfon:
Paint the Interior and exterior to preserveShe-Ute of.the resenroir.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
No sipniflcant Impad �
Bud98t: - . 2011 YTD Attual 2012 11 Budget:
e�de�e ��din,�s e�de� s.ieo�
Adopted Budgef . .. - � . _ -- � ' ' '
Budget Amendmenls
� Adjustetl 8udget - - - -
AetlVity:
� � 2011 YE 2072 Year End
. �Funtling Sources:.. �� Prlor to 2011 EsNmate . m12 Bu 2013 Bud P eet Total .
Unrestri�edWate%Revenue -� '� . � - - � - 700,000 -
Granfs(Fed,Sfate,Local) - - - � - -
Bontl Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Tohl Funding Sources: � �. . - . - . . 700,000 - - �
Capipl Expenditures: .
Design - - • 90,000 -
RlghtolWeY ' ' ' ' '.
ConstruCion . � 610 000
Total ExpendiNrea: ' ' � � • • - . 700,000 - • � .
Forecasted ProJed Cost:
7otal
2074� _. . .TA15 2078. 2017 2012-2017
Funding Sourees: ". � � .
Unres6r'Ued Water Revenue - - - - 700,000
. G�(Fed,State.lacel) ' '� ' ' '
BondProceeds ' '� ' '
OMer
Total FunAi�Sources: � - � - ' ' 700.000
Capital E�enditurea: . .
� Design - - - - 90,000
Right ot Way � - - - - '
. Cons6uetion 610 000
� Total.Expenditures: � .' . - . . -. 700�000
GraMS/Other Sources: � �
99
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capital FadlitiesPlan,
Sfx Year Capiql Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 EnterpNSe Funds
Project 7itle: Comprehensive Water Plan
Projed No: Cp�000[
Projea Type: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager: Lamothe
Descrlqtlon: - -
Update the Comprehensive Water Plan as required by Washington State Department of Health.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: ' .
. No signifiqnt impact. '
� Budget:� 2011 YTDActual 2012 11 Budge!
� Budget , Expenditures Budget Balanae
Adopted8udget - - �- � -
� Budget Amendments �
Adjusted Budget - - - - � - - ---
AcUVity:
� .2071 YE � 2012 Year EnA �.
,. Funding Soureas: Prfor W 2011 Estimate 2072 B aS. 2019 et ed Tafal.
UnrestnctetlWeierRewanue - - - � - -
Grants(Fed:State.local) - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - �-
Other
. ToTal PwWing Sovrces: - - .- .. _ . . -
� Capital Fzpandituras: - � �
� pB� ' ' : ' . '
. � Rght of WaY - - - - � -
' ConsVUCtion
Totel Expendifures: ' ' ' - . .. , . . _ '
Foreeasted ProJeet Coste
Tctal.
� � • 2074 2015 2078 2017 2012-2077 .
Fundi�Sourees: -
UnresVictedWaterReqenue 100,000 - - � - �100,000
Grants(Fed,State.Locaq - - - - -
� Bontl Proceeds - - - �- -
Ofher
Total FundingSourees: 100.�0 - • - - " � 700,000
Capilal F�pendiWres: .
Design t00,000 - - - 100,000
' Rlght of Way - - - • - -
ConsWCtion � �
Tofal Expenditures: 100,000 - - • ' 100,000 �
Grants/Other Sources: � �
1��
City ofAuburn Capital FacilitiesPlan •
�. WATER FUND (430) capiiei Faeiiities Pian
SIx Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,2D12-2017 ErRerprise Funds
Project Tiae: Well 4 and IMertie Pump Station Improvements
Project No: e512a0
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projact Manager: Leah Dundson ,
Descriptlon: ,
Construct a new building at the Well 4 site to'house a diasel-fueled standby generaWr,new hypochlorita disinfecfion equipmeM;and�
restroom facilltles accessible from inside and outside the building.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operatlng Budget:
No sgnificaM impad. � �
Budget: sott rroa�wai 2ot2 t�sua�.
sueget � F�end�wres� .ewlgoe � ea�anre
. . Adopted Budget � ' - . - - -
ew9er ameneme�,rs
Adjusted9udget _ . .- - '
AetlVlty:
� - � 2077 YE 2012 Year End
Funding Sourees: � Prior to 2011 �.Estlmffie 20�2 Bu � 2079 Bud et Pro'eet Total
_ UnrestrictedWeterRevenue � � . 6,700 - �00,000 .. � 600,000 106,700
Grants(Fed.Stete.Loce1J ' � ' - - � ' - .
. BorM Proceeds ' ' ' • '
OMer
Tofal FunAing Source3: � 8,700 100,000 - 600,000 106,700
Caplhl E�andltlues: � .
�� saao - �oo,000 - �osaoo
R�ynraway - - - _ _
co�sweLOO soo aoo
. - Total E�enditures: � &700 - 100,000 W0,000� 106.700 �
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Total
2014 � 2075� 2016 �2077 2p1Y•2077. �
Funding Srnirces: � � � - - - - - �
UnrestriGed Water Revenue � - - � - - 700,000 -
Grants(Fed.State,Loca1J . ' ' ' ' ' .
� Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources: - � . - . 7U0,000 �
� ' Capifal Expendltures:
� Design ' • - - - 100.000� .
RfgMo/Way • - - . - - _
�s�� � - 600 000 .
Total Expenditures: - ' ' ' - ' 700.000 '
Grants/OMer Sources: -� - � � �
101
Gity of Auburn Capital Facilities Pla»
WATER FUND (43Q) cap�ta�Pae�ques e�"an
Six YearCapital Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 EMerpNse Funds
Project Title: Well_5'Upgrade
Project No: cp0624
Project Type: Non-CapaCity
Project Manager: L.emOthe ,
Deseription: --
ConsWC[a new well facility meeting curtent electrical and safety codes. The project will'.include emergency badcup�power and
disinfection capabiliry.
Progress Summary:
Futd►e Impaef on Operatlng Budget: . .
No sign�carR impact.
BudgEt: • 2071 YTD Aetual �$072 17 Budget
.. � Budget Expendidires Butlget��- Balmiee
� Adoptad Budget - - � - " � -
. BudgetAmentlmenis . -
Adjustetl Butlget - � - - =
AcNVity: �
2017 YE 2012 Year Eed .
Funding Sources: Prior to 2011 Estlmeta 2012 Bud et �2013�Bud e! Pro ac!Total
Un�esMeted WatarRevenue 55,900 � - - 1�,700,000 55,900 .
� Grents(Fed.Stete,Locall - � - - � ' - -
Bond Proceeds • - - � - -
Otlrer
� :Total Funding Sources: 55,900 • - � 1,700,000 55.800
Capiml EqiendHures:
� Dasign 2.600 - - �200.000 �202.800
Righf olWay - - - � 200,000 - •
Construetlon 53,300 -1,300,000. ._t-,353,300
� '� . '. Total Eqiendlh�res: - .� . _ . .
Foreeasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
2014 2075 2016 Z017 .,2012•201Z .
� Funding Sourees: - � � - - "
. �UnresMCted WaterRavenue - - • � - 1�,700,000� �
Grents(FedSYete,Locaq - - - - -� .
� Bond Proceetls - - . - - -
Other
� Total Funding�Sourees: - �- - . -� � -� " 1;700,000
Capftal�pendltures: � �
Design • - - - 200,000
� RigM ol Wey - - � - - � 200,000
Construction �1 300 000�
Total EapendHures: - - - . �- 1,700,000
GraMS I Other Sources: '
1�2
Ciry of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) "capnai Fediiaes aien
$ix Year Capi4al Facilities Plan,20't2-2017 - Eriterprise Funds
Project Titie: Wetl 7 Emergency Power
Project Na: Cp7aaa
ProJect Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Deserlption;
Provide a generator for backup power to reliably meet demands in the Valley service area.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: •
No significant impact.
Budget: 2ott vro,quu� zo�z t� suaeee
suaeee Expenen�res eue�e sa�ce
. . _ . ' Adopted Budget - ' - '
BudgetMiendrtieiNS . - - -
Adjusted Budgel ' ' ' '
Aetivity:
� � 2011 YE 2012 Year�End
� � Fundi�Sources:� . � ��PriorM Z017 �EsBmsEe 2012 Bud " 2077 8u Pro eet 7ota1
Unrestric[ed.WeterRe4enue � - - - 70,000 -
Grenfs(Fed.Sfate.Locel) � - - - - ' -
�BondProceeds - - - - -
OMe/
Total Funding Sourees: � • � - - . �70,000 -
Capifal ExpendLLtires: . . �
DesiBn ' - - - 70,000 -
Rght oI WaY _ ' ' ' '
ConstruciiOn �
Total F�cpenditures: - .. - . - 70.000 -
Forecasted Project Cost:
Tofd
2014 � 2015_ . 2018 2077 2012-2017
Fumling Sourmsr . . . �- � -- -. . ._ - -- -
Unrestricted.WaterRevenue 240,000 - - - 3'10,000 �
Grants(FerI.SYate.LoeaQ - - - ' •
� Bond Pmceeds - - - - -
Ofher
- Total Funtli�Sources: 240.000 � - • - 370,000
Capital.F�cpendilurea: �
�Design , - - - - 70,000�� �
Right o/Way - - - • - �--
Construeflon 240 000 240 000 �
Total ExpenAltures: 240,000 � - - - 310,OOD
Grants/OMer Sources: -� . � �-
103
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan .
WATER FUND (430) - Capltal EaGuUes Plan
Six Year Capkal Faeitities Plan,2012-2017 EMerpriseFunds
Project Title: Maintenance $ Operations Facilityimprovements
Project Na cp�000c
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. TBD
Desedptlon: _ .
; Improvements to M&0 facilities and�operetions�including ramodel the existing building. ' � � - _ �
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
No signiFlcaM impact.
BUdget: 2011 VTDActual '2012 11�Budget
� � ' Budget Expendkmea�, 8udget Balance
- Adopfed Budget � - - � - -- -- - - - -- -- - ---- -
BudgetAmendmeMS �
� Adjusted�Budget - � - - . -
/1ctiVlty:
� . - 2011 YE 2012 Xear EnA
_ Fundinp Sources: Prfor M 2011 . . Estlmate 2072 Bud et 2013 Bud t -. : Pro eGTotsl
- Unrestricted WaferRevenue - , - - 300,000 .
GranGS(Fred,State,LOCaIJ - - - - - -
. . Bontl Proceeds - - -• ' -
Other
� 7otal Fundinp Soureea:� -� - • .300,000 �
Capital Expenditures: �
. . .Design - ' ' 70.000 . -
Right of WaY - - . - - - -
Conshuctlon 230000 _ . _
� Total ExpeMitures:�. ' ' ' �300.000 _ _ . _ " .
ForeeBsted Pmjed Cost: -
Tolal
, � . 2014 2015 2016 2017 -2012-2017
� - � Fvnding Soumes: .. .
. � Umastricfetl Wate}Re4enue - - -� -� .300,000
Grants(Fed,State,LOCeI)� - - - � . _ � - -
Bond P�oeeeds - - - - .
Other
. Total Funding Soureea: - - . . , . . ' .900,000
Capital Expendlturea:. � � � . ., �
Desig^ - - . -� . - 70,000 '
Righto/Way - - - -� -
ConstrueNon 230000
Total Expendilures:. _ _ .. . _. 300.000
Grants/Other Sources:
1�
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
`WATER FUND (430) CapKai Fad�if�es P�en
Six Year Capital Facilides Plan,2012-2017 EMerprise F�mds.
Froject Title: MIT Master Meters
Project No: cp�ooa
ProjectType: Non-CaPacity
ProJed Manager: TBD �
DeseHptlon: -
Install master meters to Muckleshoot Indian Tribe�properties to ease account administration. � .
Progress Summary: '
_ _ ._ -
Future)mpact on Opereting Budget:
. No sign�cant impact. -
Budget: za�t vrnqeeual 2ot2 t� Bua9e�
: ' � .Budgat _ _Expendllures . Budgat .. Balance _
Adopted8udget . . . _._ . .:.
. Budget AmendmenGS �
AdJuSted ButlgBt ' - - - .-
AetiVity: _ T__
2071 YE .2012 Year Erid
FunAing Sources:� . Pdor to 2071 Estimate 2072 8 1 -2019 Bu eS -..- aet Total
Unrestrkted WeterRei�enue - - 80.000 ' 400,000 80,000
Grents(Fed,State.Locall - - - ' -
Bond Proteeds ' ' . ' ' '
Other
Total Funtling Suu'ees: � - - BD,000 �400.000 60,000
Capital ExpendiWres:: .
�Design - - 80,000 400,000 80,000
.Rlghta/WeY - ' — ' '
Construclion . -
� Totel Expendilures: � - - . 80,000 400,000 B0,000
Foreeasted Project Cost: . � �
Total
• �2074 2015 � 2018 2077 2072•2077
FunAing Sourcea:� �
Unrestricted Weter Revenue ' - - - - 480,000
GreMs(Fed,Stefe.Loea!) - - - ' -
BorM Procaeds � ' ' ' ' '
OMer
Total Fundi�Sources: � � - � -_ - - . 480,000�
Capital E�endiUnes:�
Design . � - - - - 480.000
RigMolWaY - - - •- -
- Construction �
� Totel Expenditures: � _. - . .- .. q8p,ppp
Grents/Other Sourees: . �
105
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capltel Eacilities Plan
Six Year Capltal Facilities Plan,2012-2D77 ErKerprise Funds
Project Tiue: Street Utility Improvements
Project No: cp�000c
Project type: Non-Capacity
ProjectManager. TBD
Deseription: -
Water main improvements in coordination wkh SOS and general arterial street improvemants.
Progress Surtimary:
Future ImpacfonAperating Budget:
No sipnificarrt impad ' � � . �
Budget: 20�� rrD ne�uai 2012 ii Bua9et
, Budget ExpenAilurea BudgeS. Balsnce
Adopfed 8udge! - - - -
Budget Amendments
Ad/usfed�BuUgeb - - - _
ACtlVi�/:
(Prevlous 2 Yre) 2077 YE 2p12 Year End
FurMing Sources: Prior to 2017 Eatimate 20�2 Bud 2073 Bud et __ 'Pro' Toisl. .
UnrastrictedWateYRevenue 50,000 100,000 - 100,000. , �200,000- - - - 250,000
Grents(Fed.Sfate�Locel) - - - . - ' .
Bond Proceeds - ' • - -
Ofher
TotelFUnEi�Sources: 50,000 100,000 �100,000� -200,000 - - -250,000
Capkal E�e�itures:
� ' Design 50,000 15,000 15,000 20,000 80,000
�qnr o�wey - - - - -
co�swono� as o0o es o00 �eo 00o no 000
Total Expendilures: � 50,000 700,000 100,000 �200,000 �250,000
Foreeasted Projed Cost:
roml
� -_ 2014 2075 2018 2017 . 2012.Y017
� Funding Sources: � - - � - -
uR�so;�aawei�.ae�re��re zoo,000 zoo.000 zoo,000 zoo,000 r,�oo.000
Grarrts(Fed.SYare.Local) • - . - . - '
� � Bond Proceeds ' ' '
� � Ofher ' . �
Total Funding Sourees: 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,100,000
Capkal Expenditures:
Oesign 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 115,000
. Righto/Way • - - � - -
Cons6vction 180 000 180 000 180 000� 180000 985 000
ToSal F�cpendltures: 200,000 200,000 200.000 �200,000 1,t00,p00
GraMaY Other Sources: �
106
Ciry ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capifal Faoitkles Piao
Six YearCapital Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds
arojegt Tine: Water Resources Protection Program
P,roject No: Cp�doot
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity(Improvemerns)
Projed Manager. Thom
Descriptfon: -
Implement strategies identified in the Wellhead Protedion Program to proteot City water souroes.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: - -
No significant impact
Budget: • 20�� rrnaeeuai zo�2 ��euasei
' � ' _BuGget. Ezpendlturea BudgeS Balanee
� _ Adopted Budget , - � - - _
. 6udgef AmerMmeiits .
AdjustedBudget �- -. - . _ . '
�IVIly: � �.
. (Prevbus 2 Yrs) 2017 YE- 2012 Year F�M
Funding Sources: . _ . � Prfor W 2017 .Estimate ��.2072Bud et .2013 B at 7otal
UnresMCtedWaterRevenue • 21-,900 �5,000 5,2b0 - 26,900
GraMS fFed.State.Locall - � - - ' -
Bond Proteeds ' ' • ' '
Ofher
� Totai FunAing Sourees: • 27,900 � 5,000 5,200 26,900
Capltal Expendkures: � .
Design • - - '
RightofWay - - - - ,
ConstruGion 21,900 �5.000 5,200 .28,900
� Total Expenditures: - 27�,900 5,000 5.200 '26,900
Foreeasted Projed Cost:
7otal
' � � _ 2074 _2015 2018� 2017� 2012-2017 �
FunAing Sources• . � . .
UnresGicted�WeterRevenue 5,300 . 5,500 5,600 5,800 32,400
Grants(r-etl.stete,L.ocaq • - . - - - .
Bond Proceeds ' - - ' -
OHier
Total Funding Sour�s: 5.300 5.500 5,800 5.800 52;400 �
' Capilal Espendkwes: . .
pgsign ' ' ' ' '
Righto/Wey - - - _ _ �
Canshucfion . . 5 300 ._ 5 500 5 6Q0 5 8U0 32,400
Total Expendkums: 5.300 5,500 5,800 5,800 � - 3Y,400
GraMS!Other Sources;
1��
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capita�Faei�ities P�an
Six Year Capital Facilities Plao,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds;
- ---
Project Tiue: Mnual Reservoir Repair S Replacement Program
Project No: Cp�oocx
Projed Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Deseription: _ �
PerFOrm resenroir maintenance such as the evaluation of facility�conditlon and installation sample ports and��seismic isolation.valves on
inleUoutlet piping.
Progress Sumreary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
� � None � . . � � . .
Budget:� . � . 2011 YTDAcWaI� . 2072 71 Budget
� Budget �Expentlkures BdEgat Balariee
� Adopted Budget . - . . - . -.. - . . ,
Budget Artientlments.
- �;AdjustedBudget �- . _ - - - -- -
Activity: --- — .
(Provious 2 Vro) �2077 YE . 2U12 Year End
- FuMingSouroes: - PriotSO2017 . EstimaEe 2012 et�. 20738u at _ P �'eetTotal� .
Unres6ictedWaterRevenue - - �50,000 10,000 � �10,300 � � 60,000
GrenLa(Fed.State.Lxep - ' - - .-
Bwid Proceeds - - • - -
Ofher
Total Funding Sou�oes: - 50,000 ��10.000 � � �70,300 60,000
� eap�m�Expenalwres:
Design - 10,000 10,000��
Right of WaY - - _ - -
� CwrsWCtion 40,000 10 000 .10 300 50 000
. • ToWI Expenditures: - 50,000 :-10,000 . 10,100 60,000
Forecasted Project Cost: �
Totel
� 2014 2015 2018.• 2017 � _2012-2017__�
� ' Funding Sourees: - - � . � � ��� '
UnresOictedWaterRevenue 10,600 �10,900 �11,300 11.600 64,700�
Grents(Fed,State.Loeal) - - • - -
Baid Rviceeds - - -
OMer
Total Funding Souroea: 10,600 70,900 11,300 �17,600 64,700
Capital Ezpenditures: . .
Design -
Right o)Way - - - - -
ConsWCfion 10600 10,900 11300 11,800 64,700
TotalExpenditures: 70,600 �70,900 N,300 � 11.800 -- 84,700�
Grents/Other Sources: � �
1�g
City oJAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Capifal Faeilifies Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds
Projed 7itle: SCADA Upgrades � •
Project No: G524a0
ProjectType: Non-Gapacity(Improvements)
Project Manager. Lee
Deseription: . :
� Upgrade�the axisting Supervisory Control and�Deta Acquisftion(SCADA)system,also known as the Telemetry system,to�replace
� obsolete components and allow for control of�the water utiltty facilities. � . . .
Progress Summary: - .
Fbture Impaef on Operating Budget:
No sign�caM impact.
Budget: zott rn neeuei 2ou �� sud� .
e�a� �o�d�i�rea euago� sa�ri�
. Adopted Budget � - . . ' . - . _,
. , Budget Amendments ' �
Adjusted Budget . - ' - .-
ACtlVity:
� �- 2011 YE � 2072 Year E�M
- Fundi��urees: Priw to 2011 Estlmata . 2012 Bu . 2013 BuA �et Pro'eet Total
UnresVictedWeterRevenue • 50,700 � 428,500 1,110.700� � . - 1,589,900
Grarits(Fed.State.LOCaI) ' - - - -
' BondProceeds 135,000 1,015,0� - - 1,150,000
OMer
Total Funding Sourcea: � � 785,700 1,443,500� 7,110.700 - 2.7�9,900
caPimi�enan„res:
Design 185,700 1,443,500 1,110,700 - 2,739,900
RlgM of Way - - - - .
Construction.
Total Expendltures: , 185,700 7,443,500. 7,170,700 �-� 2,739,900
• Foreeasted Projed Cost:
Total
. � 2074 ' .2015 - 2076 2017 2012-2017 �
FwMing Sources: �
Unres[rkfed Weter Revenue - . - -� ' 1.110.700
Grents(Fed.State.Local) - .. _. . - - -
� Bond Proceeds � - - - • -
OUrer
7otal Fundi�Sources: � - . -. .- � - , 1.N0,700 �
' Capital Expendkures: �. � .
�esign - - - - 1.1]0.700
� Righto/Wey - -. • - -
Constructlon �
. Total Expanditures: � - - -. .� . 7,170,700
� Granta/Other Souroes: � . �
109
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) capira�Faeiinies aian
Six YearCapital Facilities PWn,2012-2017 E�erpdse_Funds
Projea Tine: Fulmer Well Field Improvemerrts �
ProjectNO: cp1107 �
Project Type: _
Project Manager: Lamothe/VOndfak - '
DeseAption:
Conduct an evaluation of the Welis 2, 6�and 7 facilities and the Fulmer Field Corrosion�Control Treatment Facility to�assesstha supply
and treatment capacity of the existing facilities and infrastructure. Ttie evaluation will include an assassmeM of indiJidual and total well�
� supply capacities,a�review ot the treatment facility operating and coMrol parameters,and recommendations for facility.and confrol
improvemeMs based on the avaluation.
Progress Summary: .
Future Impaet on Operatlng Budget: . -` � `
No signrficaM impac[.
BUdget: ' , 20N YTDAetual '2ot2 .. . 11 BuAgeY .
� � � � . � � Budget Ezpendllures Budgat _ .Balanee �..
.. . . Adopted Budget � _ . _ � -. .: . .
.BudgetAmendments - � - -
.. Ad%uffied Budget - - • � -
ACtfvity: '
' 20N YE 2012 Year End
. � Fu�Ming Sourcm: Grtor M�11 ..�EsSimate 2012 B � 2013 B t -Pro eit ToTal
UnrestrfctedWaterRevenue - �200.000 � _-800.000 �1,000,000 1,000,000
' GreMS(Fed.State,Local) ' - - ' -
Bond Proceeds - - _ � ' ' ' '
OMer
' Total FunAing Soureea: - ' 200,000 800,000. 1,000,000 �1,000,000
. ' Capital F�panditures: � ' .
Design - 200,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 .
� Right W Wey - - - - - . -
Constructlon �400 000 - -500000 - -_40U 000� '
. � TotalF�cpenditures: - 200,000 800,000 � � ,1.00U,000 '- ----1,U00,000�
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Total
� � - 2074 2075 2016 2017 ZfM2=2077
Funding Sources: � � �
. Unrestricted�WeterRevenue - - - - -� 1;800,000� '
Grents(Fed.State.LOeaQ� - - - - -�
Bond Proceeds - - - -� . -�
OMer
� � � Total Fun�ng Sourees: � ' ' ' ' � 1,800,000
� Capital Expenditures: _ '
Design ' - • - 900.000
. RightofWay - - - - � -
ConsbwYion 900 000
Total Expendrtires: ' ' ' . � 1,800.000
GranLS!Other Sources: - - '
11�
City ofAuburn Capital Faeilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) ca�,�tai Faei�u;es e�an.
SIx Year Capital Factlides Ptan,2012-2017 Errterprise Funds
Project Title: M Street Grade Separation . �
Project No: C2018
Project Type: No�-CapaCity
Project Manager. Sweeting
DeseHptlon:
Construct distribution system improvemeMS identified in the 2009 Comprehensiva Watar Plan Capital Improvements Program in�
conjunction with tha M S[reet Grede Separation project.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on OpereUng Budget:
None
Budget: 2ot1 YTD Aewal 2012 �N BuAget
� � Budget Ezpenditurea Budget Balanea �.
.. . . AdoPfedBud9et ' .' - � -.
_ Budget AmeiMmerns _ � - -
Adjusted Budget - �- - � ' -.
ActNity:
zo��ve 2072 Year End
� FunAing Sourees: .Prior to 20N. EsUmate 2012 Bu et- 2013 Bud eS Pro'eeS Total
� UnreshlctedWeterReosnue " - - 150,000 - 150,000
GreiMS(Fed,Sta2e.Loeel) � - - - - -
Bond Pmceeds - ' - - -
Other - -
Total Funding Sourees: • � - 750,000 - 750.000
Cepffal Expenditures:�. .
Design ' - - • - -
RightWWay � - • - -� -
Conshuction 750 000� 150 000
TotelExpentliWres:�. � . . • -� -= 150.000 . - 130.000
Forecasted Projed Cost: � '
7otal
2014 . .2015 2016 2077 2072-2017 .
Fundfng Sourees: " ..
Unrastr7Ged.WaterRe�renue - �- - - -150,000
� Grents(Fad.Stete.Local) � - ' - - -
Bond Roceeds ' ' ' ' '
OMer
. � Total Fumlfng Sources:� . . - - - • _ 750.000
Capital Expeedkures:
�� . - - - -
R1gMolWay - - - - -
� Consttiction �150 000.
� . Total Ezpenditures: - � - .. . - - 130.000
Grarrta/Other Sources: � �
111
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) cap�ra�Faci�n�e§P�an
Six Year Capital Faeitttles Plan,2012-2077 Enterprise Funds
Project Title: Lea Hitl PRV Station Improvements
Project No: Cp7000c •
ProjectType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Deseriptlon: .
Replace pressure reducing valve stations in the Lea Hill area. �
Progress Summary: "
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: .
No signiflcant impact. .
Budget:'. 2011 YTDAetual 2012 11Butlget.
� s�a¢oe ��aie� ew�. :aw�.
. � Adopted 8udget _ ' _ . - - _ .—.— _____'_
Budpef Amendmerrts
� . Ad%ustedBudget ' ' ' � .
ACfIV7ty:
, 2017 YE 2072 Year End
Funding 3ources: Pr1or to 2071 . Estimate 2012 6tiA . 2073 6ad�- .:P�� eet Total— �
. . _ ..,.. _ -
UmesMCfed INeter Revenue - - • 50,OOD � � 350,000 � -- �-50,000 .
. Grants(Fed,State,Locel) - - - . -
� Bontl Proceeds. - ' -. _.
Other
� � Total Funding�Sources: � • - 50,000, � -� 350,000 50,000
Cepkal Expenditures: •
� ' Design - - 50,000 - 50,000
Right o(Wey - - �- - ,
Constructlai ' 350 000
. Total ExpenHkures: - - 50,000 . 950,OG0� SU,000
ForeeastedProJeet Cost:
�� � � - Total
� 2014 2015 2016 .2017 . 2012-2077_ _
Funding Sources: � - � � � ��� �
. Unresblcted WaterRevenue - - �- - 400,000
Grants(Fetl,State.Locall - - - - - .
Bond Proceeds -- ' ' - -�
ONer
� Total Funding�Sources:. • - • . - - -400.000-
Capibl F.xpendllures: . .
Design - - - - 50,000
Righf W WaY - ' • - -' -
Construetion 350 000
Total Expendkures: - - - � - C00,000 '
Grants/Other Sources: � ' �� �
112
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) cap+ta�Facmtfes P�an �
SixYear Capital Faeilides Plan,2012-2017 ' Ernerprise Funds
Projed Title: Deduct Meter Replacement Project
ProjectNo: cpl000c
Froject Type: NOn-CepOCity
Project Manager. TBD -
Description:
� Replace meters,�associated piping and surface restoration at high volume�services where damestlawater is currently.used for irrigation
and industrial purposes. ' �
Progreas Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget:
No significant impact. � �
Budget: zm� vroa�cnwi zo�� �teuavet
� e�a� ��dn� e�e�c ea��
ndoPrea e�dgei - - - -
� Budgef AmeJMmeMS - - -
' � �� Adjusted Butlget_ �� � - - - -
Aetivity:
• 2077 YE 2012 Year End
. Funding Sourees:. � Priw to 2011 Estlmate .� 2012 8ud et. - 2019 Bud et Pro' d ToLal
� UnrestrictedWeterRevenua - - . �50,000 250,000 50,000
Grants(Fed.Sfafe.Locall - ' - - '
8ond Woceeds - - - - '
Ofhei
Totel Funding Sourees:�. � _ - - 50,000 250,000 50,000
Capital Expe�iditures:
Design - - 50.000 - 50,000
RlghtWWey - � - - - -
Consbuetlon � - 250000
� Total Expenditures: . � . - �50,000 250,000 �SO,OUD
Forecasted Projeet Cost: "'
' Tofal
. 2074 . . 2015 _ 2018 2017 2U12-2077�- .
� Funding Sourees:� � . - � ' � �
Unrestrlcfed Weter Revenue - - � • .. - 300,000
Granfs(Fed,Stete:Locel) ` - - - �- . -
Bontl Proeeeds - • -� - � -.
' Other
Total Funding Sourees:� � ' . ' �� - - � -� - • - 300,000
Capital Expendilures: . � �
� .Design . - �- � . - - 50.000
Righto/Way - . . _ .... _ � _
Con56uetlon � 250 000
� Totel Expenditures: � ' - ' - � ,. . - 900,000
� GraMS/OMer Sources: � _ _ .. . . .
1l3
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) "Cap�tarFaoi�itles P�an
Soc Year Capital Faeilkfes Plan,2012-2017 Enterp�ise Funds
Projea Tiue: A Street NW Corridor
Project No: C20TA
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD � •
DescrlpUon:
. Construd water system improvements in conjunction with the new arterial street corridor of A Street NW between 14th SUeet NW�and
� 3rd�Street NW. -� � �
Progress Summary: " -
FutureJmpaet on Operating Budget
No significarrt impact. .
Budgetc 2ott rroaewa� zo�z tt aua9ee
. Budget ExpendlWrea Budget _._ '_ Balan¢e�- -
Atloptetl Budget - � � ' .- - � -� �- - _
_ BudgetAmendmeMS - - � � '
Adjusted Budget - - - '
14CSIVIh/: . _ � �- _ _� -
20N YE 2072 Year.End
.Punding Soureea: � Prior to 2D17�- Estlmate 2012 Bud et 2013 Bud Pre' et'fofel �
� Unresficted4VaterRevenue . .50,000 200,000 206,000 �� - 456,OD0
GraMS(Fetl.State.LOeaq - - - - - - -
� Bond Proceeds - - - - � .
Ofher
� � - � �7ota1 Fu�Wing Sourees: 50,000 200,000 206,000 - 456,000
CaD�I Ezpanditures: � ' .
Design 50.000 • � - - �.50,000
Righf of Way - - - � �
� ConsWCUon 200000 208�000 � 406000
, Total EzperMitures: 50,000 200,000 206,000 � - � 456,000
Forecasted ProJeet Cost: - --; ----
� - " � rom� �,. .
.. . ' 2014� 2075 2078 2017�. 2012•207Z - .
. .Funding Sourees: . . . � - --- - —- --- '- �
� ' UnresWCted Wa{er Revenue - - - � �- � 206,000 �
� ; �Grerns(Fed,Sfate.locaq - • - � - -
�Bond Pioceeds - - • - '
� : . Other . .
Total Funding Sourees: - - - � � - ZO6,000 ��
� CapNal E�e'Mkures: � . . . � .
DeslSn - - � • -
RigMo/Way - - - - -
����o� - 206.000.
Total Eq�endltures: - - . - -208.000 �
� � Grents FOther Sources: - � .
114
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
WATER FUND (430) Cap�tal Faciuve's P1an
Six Year Capital FaciliHes Plan,20121017 EMerprise Furids
Project Taie: WaterProjects -Long Term Debt
Project No: cp�000c
Projea Type: Non-Capa&ity(Improvements)
Project Manager. TBD
Deseriptlon:
Funding allocated to pay for long-tertn debt 2012-2017 is as follows:
2005 Bond Revenue $1,379,800
2010 Revenue Bond $5,584,000
PW-99-791-003 Corcosion Control Facilities $1,094,200
PW-0'I-691-006 Corrosion Control Treafinent Faalities $1,413,600
PW-02-691-002 Reservoir Protective Coating $170,000
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
PWTF Long-Tertn Debt Service
Budget: - 2071 � YTDAeWaI � 20iP� 17Budget
� Budget Expendllures - � �Budget Balanca
Adopted Budget - - � - -
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget - . - - -
Activlty:
:2011 YE 2012 Year E�
Funding Sources:� Pdorto 2011 EsGmah� 2012 Bu et.. 2013 Bd et Pro Toml
Un�esMctedSewe�Revenue 726,500 1�,337.800 -- . 1,363,800 ' -1,672,600 -.3,427,900
Grants(Fed.�State.Loeal) ' - - - -
Bond Proceeds - _ - - -
Otlrer
Total Funding Sources: 726,500 1,337,800" 7,363,600 �1,872,600 3,427,900
Capital ExpandiWres:
Design - - _ � _ _
R'ghtolWey " - - - � - _
Long-Term Debt Service� 726 500 _1 337 600 ' 1 363 600 � �- 1 672 600 .3,427,900
� Tofal Fxpendilures:� . 726,500 7,337,800. 1,363,600 Y,674,600 9,427,800�
Forecasted Project Cost:
raai
2016 2075 . 2016 Z017 2012-21M7
Funding Sourees: - � -
UnreshicfedSewerRevenue 1,671,900 7,669,100 1,667,400 1,597,000 9,641,600
Grents(Fed.SYate.Local) - - ' - -
BondProceeds. ' ' ' '
Otl�er '
TotalPundingSources: 1,8T1,800 �7.668.100 � 1,667.400� 1.597.000 9.647.W0�
Capifal ExpendHures:
pgsjyn ' ' ' ' '
RigMO(Way ' ' ' ' '
LOng-Term Debt Service� 1 671 900 Y 669 100 � 1 667 400� 1 597 000 - 9 641 600
Total Experttlituras: � 1,871.90D 1.669.700 1,667.400 1.587.000 9.641�,600
Grents/Other Sources: � '
115
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
ras�e w-a
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
WATER .
Pro'eet: 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
1 LeeNlllBoosterPumpSfatlon $ ' $ ' .$ ' $ ' $ ' _$ ' ' $�� � �. .
y We1111mprovemeMS - - - - - -
- 3 GreenR/verPUmp�Statlon � -
' Emergeney Power - - - - ' - -- � -
q IntertlaMhasWetrrre - - . - _ - . ..
� 5 � AnnualD[stribuffonlmprovemerKS � '
g LakelandHilhReservolre - 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 6,000 '
� wmi m:�eoro�e�a rsede�rero�rrrem
Pioarem - - - - - - - -
�$ WaEar Repalr 6 Rep/aeement . _ _ _ _ _ _
g AeademyPumpBtatfon#1 - - - - ° .. _ . _
� 1Q LakefandHilisReservoirPaintlng � -
77 ComprehensiveWaterPlan ' - - - - - - - � _.
� 12' We114 antl/ntertle Pump Statfon
fmProvemeMs �. . . - - - - - - -
73 We1l5UP9�� - - - - - -
14 We07EmergenryPower - - - - -. . ,. . . -
15 Me/Menanca 6 Opeiatlorrs �
. . Ezpe/nlon - - - - - - -
. .�g MITMesterMetrn � - -. - - - ' -
17 Suaetuaruryrmprovemer�� - - - - - - -
. 18 WatelResW�essProteetlon
w��.. . ' ' ' ' „ ' ' '
19 Annua/Reserroir Repair d
. Replaeement�program - - - - - - -
. . 20 SCADA Up�fate � - _ - _ - - -_
- , 21 Fulmer Well Field/mprovementr
� :� M Sbeat Grade SeparrtMn - - - - - - ... .
� �.� Lske/and HNS PRV Sfatlon � � � �
dnpmvemerits . . . - - - ' - ' ' - '
�y4 DedudMaterReplacemem - - - ' - - . -.
25 A Sbeet NW Cwridor - - ' - . ' ' -
T� 3 - S 1,200 S 1.200 S - 1,200 E 1,200 S 1,200 E 6,OQ0
116
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
SANITARY SEWER
Current Facilities
The City's sanitary sewer service area encompasses approximately 28-square miles which_are
primarily within the City limits, but. inoludes a.total of approximately '/: square mile within
Aubum's Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage
treatmeM and disposaL The City'S 5anitary Sewer Utility is responsible for 4he collection and
transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines.
The City's current inventory of approximately 215 miles of sewer lines serves the City's sewer
service area. Table S-1, Faciiities Inventory, iists the sewage collection and transmission
facilities along with their capacities and locations.
Level of Service (LOS)
The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan forthe Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level
of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City's sewage.collecfion system. These standards
represent the average quantities of sewage that the system must accommodate, for residential,
industrial, and commercial development.
Capltal Facilities Projects and Financing
InvestmeMs in the Ciry's sewage collection facilfties include primarily non-capacity
improvements and replacement projeots. Mticipated replacements include three existing pump
stations, replacement of aging sewer pipes and manholes in conjunction with arterial and local
street improvements, and replacement of pipe identified tFirough the sewe� program's condition
assessment process. Anticipated improvements include an upgrade of the Cify's SCADA .
network,'and upgrades and additions to the utility's maintenance facilRies. The Cityof Aubum's
sewer system anticipates costs for nine non-capacity projects totaling $12,925,900 and long-
term debfitotaling $4;327,800 for a Cryear planning expectationtotal of$17,253,700. Teble S-2
shows the proposed financing plan followecJ tiy individual wbrksheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Opereting Budgets
There are no operating budgeY impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the suc
years 2013—2018.
117
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABL:E S-1
Facilities Inventory
Sewage Facilities
FAGILITY MGD LOCATION
Pum -Sfafions:
8th Street 0.26 J Street NE & 8th Street NE
22nd Stieet 0:79 22nd Street SE & Riverview Drive
rea 19 0.47 Lake Tapps Pkwy E 8 West of72nd Street SE
ubum-40 0.63 4159 "O" Piace NE
D Stieet 0.58 D SVeet NE 8 Aubum Way N
Dogwood 0.29 Dogwood Street SE 1500 8 i 5th Street SE �
Ellingson 0.72 41st SUeet SE 8 East of A Street SE
F St�eet 0.86 F Street SE 8� 17th SVeet SE
North Tapps 0.73 Lake Tapps Pkwy E &West of 176th Averiue E
Peas/ey Ridge 0.36 5 320th Street& 53rd Avenue S
R Street 0.14 R Street NE 8�6th Street NE
Rainiei Ridge 0.29 125th Place SE & South of SE 318th Way
RainiecShadows 0.72 124thAvenue SE 8 SE'306th Place
Riverside 0.58 8th Street NE & 104th Avenue SE
� Tenace View 0.94 E Valley Hwy E 8 North of Terrace vew Dr SE
VaUey Meadows 0.18 4th Street SE 8 V Street SE
Verdana 2.16 11807 SE 296th Place
White MountainTrails 0.18 SE 292nd Street S West of 118th Ave SE
FACILITY Pipe Size LOCATION
iverCrossi x
lnverted Syphon S 8 121nch Green River&26th Street NE
8fh SfieetBndge 14 Inch Green River&8th Street NE
118
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE S-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECT$_AND FINANCING
SANITARY SEWER DIVISION . �
2012 2013 2014 . 2015 � 2018 2017 Total
� �tkv Proiects: � .
None
�Non�CaoaeiN Profects: �
1 Sanitary Sewer Repair B�ReplacemeM -
CapitalCosts. , 590,100 1,890,900 2,724,300 1,580,000 7,680,000� 1,740,000 10,205,300�
Funding Sources: � ' .
SewerFund 590,100 1,890,900 2,724,300 1,580,000 1,680,000 1,740,000 10,205,300
Bond Proceeds � �- - �
. 2 Street Utility Improvemenffi
CapitalCosts 115,000 115,000 N5,000 115,000 115,000 , V5,000 . 690,000
Funtling Sources ' "
Sewer Fund 115,000' 115,000 � 115,000 115,000 115;000 � 115,000 �690,000
Bond Proceetls � �
3 Power Generators � .
Capital Costs ' 427,800 337,700 �- - - - , 765,500
Funding�Sources �
. Sewer Fund 427,800 337,700 - - - ' � - � 765,500�
Bond Proceeds �
�4 Lea Hill Pump Station Deeommissioning ��
Capital Costs 15,000 - - - - - . 15,000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Funtl 15,000 � � - - - - - 15,000
Bontl Proceeds
5� SCADA(Telemehy)Upgrades
Cepitel Costs 200,000 � - - - - - 200,000
Funding Sourcas: �
SewerFund� 10,000 - - - - - 70,OOD
Bond Proceads 190.000 190.000
6 Ellingson 8 Dogwood Pump Station ReplacemeMs
Capital CosLS 15,000 - - - - - 15,000
Fundfng Sources:
Sevrer Fund� 15,000 - - � - - - 15,000
� Bond Proceeds �
7� Vactor Decant Faclllty
Capital Costs - � 250,000 - - - - 250,000
Funding Sources:
Sexrer Fund - 250,000 - � - - - 250,000
Bond Proceeds
8 Maintenance and OparaSions Facility Expansion.
Capipl Costs - 300,000 - - - 300,000
Funding Sources:
Sewer Fund - 300,000 - - - - 300,000
Bond Proceeds - - - -
119
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABCE S-:2(continued) '
. 201Z• � � - 2013 2074 2015 2016 201t Total
9 2009-2070 Sanitary Sewer Repair&RePlapemeM .� -- -
. . Capital Cosls 485.100 - - - - � - 465,100. .
Funding Sources: � �
- ' �Sewer Fund� � � 23,100 y� - - - - � . 23,100 �
Bond Proceeds 462.000 - _. 48Z,000
SubtoSal.'Non�aoadtv Proieets:�. �
. CapiMal Costs � 1,848,000 2,893,600 2,839,300 1,695,000 ,1,795,000 .1,855,000 � .12,925,800 �.
Lona-tertn DeM
10 SewerLongdertn Deb! .
,Lon9dertn�Debt �592,500 732,200 730.200 728,300 727,000 . 877,600 � :4,327,6�0
Funding Sources: �
Sewer Fund 592,500 732,200 730,200 728,300 727,000 �817,600� -4,327,800.
� � Bond Proceeda - �
SuMotel.Lonn-Terrti Debt:.
CapitalCosLS 592,500 , 732,200 730,200 728,300 727,000 817,600 �4,327,800
SUMMARYi • � � . .
CAPRALCOSTS
Capaciry Prolects - - - - -
� � - Non-Capacity Projeds 1,848,000 2,893,600 2,839,300 1,695,000 1,795,000 1,855,000 12.925,900
Cang-term Debt � - 592,500 732,200 • . 730,200 728;300 727,000 . 817-,600__ _4.327.800.
Total Costs 2,440,500 3,625.800 3.569,500 2,423.500� 2.522,000�- - 2,672.600 ---17.253.700` .
�FUNOING SOURCES:
Udlity Funds(Sewe� 1,788,500 3,625,800 3;569,500 2,423,300 2,522,000 2,672,600 16,601,700
Bond Proceeds 652.000 - - - - - 652,000
� � Other - . . . - �
Total Funding 2,440,500 3,625,800 - 3,569,500 2,423,300 2,322,000 2,672,600 - 17,253,700
120
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEVIIER.FUND (431) Capital Faeilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilides Plan,2012,2017 Errterprise Funds
• Projea Titie: SanitarySewer Repair 8� Replacemerrt/System Improvements
Projed No: Cpnoa
Projeot Type: Non-Capacity(Repair and Replaeement)
Projed Manager. Elwell
Description• -
Repair and replace broken sewer mains and other fadlities. These lines will be identified through television inspection and
routine cleaning. This particular program includes propased projects which do not have an approved Projed Managemerrt
Plan, or are not assoaated with the SOS or other transportatfon improvements. Anticipated projects indude bi-annual, stand-
alone, repair and replacement projects for sewer lines which are broken, misali9ned, "bellied"or otherwise require an
inordinate amount of maintenance effort or present a.risk of backup ortrench failure.
Additbnally, system improvements which enhance the ability to maintain service are included here.
Progress Summary: „
Projected projects include:
1. Pump Station wet well rehabilitation 4. Manhole frame and cover replacements.
2.'D'Street Pump Station decommissioning 5.Pump station cathodic protection improvements
3.2012-'13 Repair and Replacement Project 6. 'F SVeet Fump Statlon improvementslrehabilitaUon
F�itbre Impad on Operatlng Budget:
This should decrease the operating budget by correcting the problems that require operations attention.
Budget: 3ott xroaed,ai zo�2 ttsuey�c
. � Butlget Expendkurea Budget BaWnee
Adopfetl Budget . � - ' - -
Budget Arnendmerrts
. Adjusted Budget - - - . -
Aetivily:
. ,(Previous 2 Yrs) '20N YE Z012 Year End
Funding Sources: . �Prior to 2071 Esdmate 2012 Bud 2073 Bud M � Pro eet Total
UnresldcfetlSewerRevenue 2,378,700 � 1,020;100 - 590,100� - 1�,890,900' �3,988,90D
Grants(Fed,SYefe.LocelJ . � ' - - ' - �
Bond Proceeds . �. .. • - - - -
Other
Totel Funtling Soureea: � - 2.378,7D0 1,020,100 590,700 7,890,900 .3,988.800
Capltal.ExpentliWres: '
Deslgn � 434,100 198,000 88,500 283,600 720,800
Right of Way '. � - ' ' ' '
Cons6ucNon �� 1 944 600� B?2 100 501 600 1,607,300 3.266,300
Total Ezpenditures:. 2,378,700 1,02D,700, 590,tU0 1,890,900 . 5,988,800
Porecastea Projea CosY.
� . . . ' ._ Total
2014 ._2015 2016 2077 .2012-20tt _
Funding Sourees: � - _ .. .
UnrestrictedSe�e�Revenue • 2.72d,300 1,580,000 1,680,000 1,740,000 10,205,300
Granfs(Fed.Stete.Loceq - �- - - '
Bond Proeeeds . - . - - - -
ONrer
Total Funding Suureea: � 2,724,300 1,580,000 7,680,000 1,740,000 10,205,300
Capifal Expendltures: �.
Design 408,600 237,000 252,000 267,000 1,530,700
_ . Rlghto/WeY - - � - - - -
Conswetlai 2,315,700 1 343 000� 1 428 D00 1 479 000 8 674 B00�
, . Total�Expanditures: . � 2,724,300 � 1,580,000 1,880,000- " -1,740,000 - 10,205,300 .
Grarrts I Other Souroes: � � �
121
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) capita� FaymUes P�an
Six Yeac Capifal FaefUtles PIan,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds
Project Title: Street Utitity Improvements � � .
Projed No: CploDOc
Project Type: Non Capacity
Projed Managec TBD '
' Deswiption: - - -
SeweFline replacement in coordination Hrith SOS and Arterial improvements.
Progress Summary: _ .
Ongoing
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: _ .
No sign'rfipnt lmpact
Budget: zo�t rroaeeuai zo�z �t sua�
� � Budget Expendkures� Budget Balanw �.
Adopted Budgat - - � - - — - -- -_
Budgetilmendments ' �
Adjusfed Budget - - - -
Activity: �
. (Previous 2 Yrsl 2011 YE 2012 Year FaM
. � FundingSources: �rforto2011 � .EeGmate 207YButl et 20138ud __Pmeet7ofal.-_
� � � UnrestrlctedSewerRevenue 200,000 - 115:000 - 115,000 � . � 115,000 ' - 430,000
. . � ` Grenfs(Fed,State.LoeelJ ' - - �. - -
Bartl Proceeds - ' . ' - -
anBr
Tocai Fu�amg sourees: zoo,000 ��s,000 »s,000 tis,000 aso,aoo
. � Caplfal ExpendiNres:
� Design 30,000 15,000 :15,000 . � 15.000 80.000
Rlghto/Way - - - - , -
� ConsLUCtlon 170 000 700 000 100000 100000 370000
TotalScpendkures: 200,000 115.000 115.000 115,000 430.000
Foreeasted Project Cost:
. . . . .. . �. . � . 7otal �
. 2074 2075 2078 2077 __205-2017! . .
FuMing Sowees: .. ... . ._ .
' ' UmestricledSewerRevenue 115,000 115.000 115,000 175,000 690,000
� Grents(Fed.S[ate.Loca!) - - - . _.
Bond Proceeds - - - .
Ofher '
� Total Funding Soureea: 775,000 115,000 NS,000 115,000 . W0,000. �
, CapNal E:pendkures:
Design 15,000 15.000 15,000 _ 15,000 � .90.000
, RlghtofWay - - ' - -
� Consfrucfion 100 000 100 000 �00 000 100.000 600 000
Total Expendkures: N5,000 115.000 N5,000 ��75,000 -690,000 �
� Granb/Other Sourees:
122
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) cap�ra�FaeumesP�an
Sbc Year Capital FaclliHes Plan,20�2-2017 Enterp�ise Funds
Project Title: Power Generators .
Project No: Cpl000[
Froject Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Description:
The purpose of this program is to systematically install backup power for all of Aubum's sewer pump stations. Installation at
individual stations may be separate projects, may be in conjunction with other upgrades to the pump station,ormay be
included with another City project. '
Progress Summary:
The 2009/10 installation of backup power has included the installation of a pertnanent generetor at the'F"Street pump
station,the temporary installation of a mobilegeneretor and security fenang at the Riverside pump station,and the design
for generators to be installed aspart of the Ellingson and Dogwood Pump Station replacemeM projects. CurrenUy,
generators for R'SVeet and 22nd Street are entering the desigNproperty aequisRion phase.
Future Impaet on Operating Budget
Budget: . 2011 �YTD Actual 20t2 17 8utlgat
� Butlget EspanAiNrea Budge! Balanee. _
AdoPtetlBtidget -. . ' -� . � - _
BudgetAmendmeMS -
Adjusted.8udget . -� . . . - ' ' '
AetlVity:
� 2011 YE . 2072 Year Eml
• Funding Sourcer. � PAa to 2011 . Estlmale :2012 Butl eS � r.2017 Bud et .Pro 'e!Tofal �
UnreshldedSewerReirenue � � - - 100,000 - 427;800 � 337,700 527,800
Grarrts(Fed,SYate,locel) - - - - -
� Bontl Proceetls - - -' � - -
. . . . Ofhe�� . .
� Total Funding Sourees: • �100.000 427.800 337,700 5Y7,800 .
- CaPNaI F.�endkures:�. .
Design - 25,000 60,000 � 50,000 85,000
Property?2ightolWay - 10,000 70,000 50,000 130,000
Cons6ucfion � � &5 000� 297 800 . 237 700 362 B00
Total ExpendlNres:. • 100,000 427,80U 337,700 , , STl,800
Forecasted Project Cost:
. . .. romi. .
� - 2014 . 2U15 2016 � � 2077 2012.2077
Funding Soureea:. �- - �
Unreshiefed Sewer Revenue , - - - • 765,500
Grants(Fed,SYate.LoeaQ ' - - - -
BorM Proeeeds - ' - ' -
Ofher
Totel FunAing Sourees:� � . . . - . 765.500
Capifal F..:penditures:
��9� - � - - 110,000
Prvperty/RigMOfWay ' - . - 120,000�
Cons6uc0'on . . 535 500
TotalEzpe�WiWrea: ' ' - - "765,500�
� Grants/ONer Sources: -
123
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) cap�ta�Fayuwas P�an
Six Year Capital FacilHles Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
ProjeaTitle: Lea Hill Pump Station Decommissioning • '
Project No: cp0756
Projea Type: Non-Capacity(Improvements)
Project Manager. Sweeting
DeseMption: "
This projed allows hvo existing City wastewater pump stations(Rainier Shadows and White MountairtTrails)to be
decommissioned. Phase 1 (CP0724)is complete and extended grevity sewer lines from the existing pump stations towards
the Verclana Pump Station. Phase 2(CP0756)will complete the connections to the Verdana Pump Station and
decommission the Rainier Shadows and White Mountain Trails pump stations.The Verdana Pump Station has been
designed to pump sewage from the two exisGng staUons as well as the new Verdana (aka"Bridges"pdevelopment.
Progress Summary:
While the Verdana Pump Station is substantially complete,the entire project is on hold.and the station has not been tumed
over to the Criy. This sheet reflects cartying over all of the designated funds from 2010 to 20'11.
Future ImpacFonAperatingBudget:
No significeM impad. While two sTations a2 to be removed,a larger station will requi2 maintenance and operations
attention.
. �� Budget:i zo71 vroaewa� zot2� ti�Bueget
. • ' .. Budget Expendkures -.BuCget 8alaece
_ . '. Adopted Budgef - - � • -
BudgetAmendments� - - -�_ - - -
AdjustedBudget - . - - -� " �-�� - =
Activity:
. � (Provious 2 Yra) 2011 YE 2012 YeacEnd�
' � � . Funding Sourees: Priw M 2077 , � Estimate 2072 Bud et� 2073 Bud et: Pro ed Sofel
� � � �UnresfdctedSewerReveriue 892200 64.700 15,000 � - 971,900 �
� Grents(Fed,SYate,LOCaI) . - - - - �
Bond Proceeds 390 000 390 000
� Total Fundirig Sourees: 892.200 454.700 �75,000 - 1,361,900
Cepkal Exponditures: � .
Design 61.200 - � - - � 81,200
RigMMWay - - - �
' Construcfion 830400 454700 15,000 1300�100
TMaI F�»'MHuros: 897,600 454,700 15,000 - . . 7,361,300
Foreeasted ProJect Cost: .
7otal
� 20'14 TO15 2076 2017 2012=2017
• FwMing Sources: �
� UnresMdad�SewerRevenue - • - � - 15,000
� GreMS(Fed,State;LocaD - - - • -
Bond Proceeds .
- Totel Funding Sourees: - • - • "- " �15,000
� � Capltal Ey7endlNres:
Desi9n - - ' - -
RightolWay - • - • - �
ConsMUCUOn 15000
7otalExpendilures: - - - - � 15,000
GraMS/Other Sources: �
124
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
-SEWER FUND (431) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilitles Plan,2D12-2017 Enterprise Funds
, Project Tide: SCADA Upgrades '
Project No: C524a0
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity(ImprovemerKs)
Project Manager: Lee
Desoription• '
The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition(SCADA also known as the"Telemetry'system)is in need of upgrading. The
ebsting system, based on an independent SCADA Assessment Study and the vulnerability study, hasnumerous obsolete
components and does not allow control of theSewer and Stortn Utility stations. The new system will utilize an open
architecture so the City is no longer reliant on one vendor for repairs and maintenance.
Progress Summary: '
Construction is proceeding under a design-build contract. Items planned for 2011 include the,construction of head-end
facilkies at M&O headquarters and completion of at least one test pump station.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No significant impact.
BUdgel: � ?A11 � YTD Aetual 2012 N Budget .
� � -� - Budget ��Expendilures Budgef Balanea
Adop[atl Budget � - . - - . -
Budget AmendrnenGa _ _ _
Adjusfed Budget - - - -
Activity:
' . (Previous 2 Yrs) 2077 YE 2012 Year End
FunEing Sources:. . . . PrfwSO 2077 Estlmate 2072 BuC . 2013 B Pro'ecS Total
UnresMIXedSewerRevenue � 670.300 �- - 10,OOD - 680,300
Gierrts(Fed.SYate.LocaQ � - - -
- BondProceeds - 1,000,000 190,000 - 1,790,000
OMer
Total FurMing Sourees: 670,300 7,000,000 200,000 " - 1,870,300
Capkal ExperMkures:
. Design " 437270 - r ' �d31.270
RigMOfWay . ' � - - - -
CpnshucNpn �� � 239,030� -_7 000 000. 200 000. 1 439 030
Totel Expendkuree: 670.3W� -��'7.000,000��- 700,000. . - 7,870,900
Forewsted Projeet Cost: .
7otal
' � - � � � �� 2074 � �-2015 2018 2017 2012=2017
Funding Sourws: . .. . . .
UnresMcted Sewer Revenue � - . -� - - 10,000 �
. Grarrts(Fed,Stete,LOesf) - - - ' , -
AondProceeds - - - - 190,000
. � � � �OMer � -
� Total Funding Soureas:` � - - .. .. . �.200.000 _
CapMal Ezpendftures: � �
Desi9^ ' - -� - - -
� RightolWaY . . ' . - - - -� .
� ConsWCfion � �- � � 200 000 �
TotafE�endkures: � . . ' - ' • • 200.000
Grar�ts I Other Sources:. -- " -
125
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEVIIERFUND (431) ' Capitai'Faa'iiitieselan
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2012-2017 Enteryrise,Funds.
Project Tine: Ellingson 8 Dogwood Pump Station Replacements
Projed No: Cp0817
Projea Type: Non Capacity
Projed Manager: SweSting
Description:
Project to replace the Ellingson and Dogwood Pump Statlons.
. ProgressSummary:
The oonstr�ction contrad for pogwood has been awardeC and construction wili begin in 20'I0 and end in 2011. The .
Ellingson station is currentlyat ttie 90%stage,will be bid in ttie fall of 2010 and constructed in 2011. ,
Futu►e Impact on Operatlng Budgeti
Tfie projed should decrease maintenance costs compared to the existing pump stations.
I Budget:� � 2011 YTD Aetual ' 2012 � ' . �N Budget
, Budget EzpenERures Budget . ��.Balance. . .
_ � . .. • AdoptedBudget • - . - _ _ '-
- 8udgef Amendments - - �
Adjusted Budget - - _ -
F1CtlVlty: . . . . .
(Previous 2 Yrs) 20N YE 2072 Yeer EnA
. , Funding Swrees: Prior to 2011_ EstimaLe .2012 Butl et � 2073 Bud et Pro eC Tofsl
. . � . Unrestricted Sewiar Revenue � �7.907.600 215,400 � 15.000 - - - 2.138.000
Grents(Fed.Sfete.Local) - - - . -� .
BondP/oeeeds - 2,568.000 - � � - 2,5G8,000�
Other
Total FunNng Sourees: 1,907,600 2,783,A00 �5,000 , 4,708,000 �
� . Capital Et[penditurea: ,
, � Design 7.025.100 ' ' ' �1',025,'100 -
� Righto/Way 50,000 • - - � 50,000� '
. � • Consfruetlon 832 500 2 783 400 15 000 3 630 900�
� ' - Total6[pendkures: 1,907,600 2,783,000 15,U00 •- ' �- - 6,706,000
Foreeasted Projeet Cost: � ,
� 7ota1
' . 2014 2015 T078 1017 2012•2017
� � � FunAingSourees: � . - - - .-- �-
. � ' Unreshided5ewerRevenue - - - , - � 15,000
G�aMS(Fed,Ste[e,Local) - • - , - � � _.
� • Bond Proceeds - • ' - ' -
Other
- Total�FunNngSourees:� - • - �� � • . 75,000
�, Capital Fxpendkures: ,
.. Design - - • - -
� Right ol WaY - - ' . - '
� Consbuc6'on . 75 000. �
Total ERpendiN'es: ' ' " . - _.75�000�
G2MS I Other Sources: �
126
City ojAuburn Capital Facilities Plqn
SEVIIER FUND (431) Capital Facilkies'Pfan
Sfx Year Capital Facilkles Plan,2012-2017 EnteFprfse Funds
Projea 7iue: Vactor Decant Facility '
Project No: Cp�ooa �
Projea Type: Non-Capacity(Improvements)
Projed Manager: TBD
Descrlption:
Funds allocated to construct a decant facility for sewer vactor waste.
Progress Summary:
Initiation Stage
Future impad on Operating Budget: �
Budget: 20�� rronetuei 20�2 �ts�w9et
. . BuCgM Expenditures .- BuEget Balanea
� � ' AdoptedBudgef ._ � �� - - , - -
Budget Amandineirts - -
. Adjusted Budget - . - - -
ACtivity:
. (Prevrous 2 vB) 2017 YE 2D72 Year Entl
Funding Sourees: Prirn to 2071 �Estirt�ate 2012.Butl �2073 Bud Pro eet Total
Unrashlcted�SewerRevenue � ' • - - 250,000 - -
Grents(Fed,State,Locel) � - - - - . -
Bond Proceetls - - . - -
OMer
Total Funding Sourees: . - . ' . 250,000 -
Capital ExpendiWres:
Deslgn • - - 50,000 -
Righ(o/WaY ' ' ' . ' _
Construcbon 200 000
' Total ExpendiNras: � - • - 250.000 -
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
21M4 2015� 2016 2017 2012-20'IF ,
Funding Sourees:� � .
Unrestricfed Sewer Revenue � - - - - 250.000
GraMa(Fetl.Sfete.LocaQ - - - - -
Bond P/oceeds • - - - -
OMer
ToLal Funding Sources:' � . � - - --- - " - • • 250,000
Capitel E�enditures: . . �
Design - - - - 50,000
Right of Way • - • - -
Consbuttion Z00 OOD ', .
� Tolal E�endltures: " . -. . ' _ . . - 250,000 .
Grerrts/Ofher Sources: - . ..—. _ .-- - . __ _. - - . . . —_
127
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) caPi�ai Faei��n�Piar,
Six Year Capital Facilitles Rlan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project raie: Maintenance and Operations Facility Expansion
Project No: cp�onoc
Project rype: Non-Capacity(Improvements)
Project Manager. TBD
Description: -
Funds allocated to expand the existing M&O building into a more functional and maintainable facility.
Progress Summary:
Initiation Stage
Fuhire Impaat on Operating Budger
Budget: 20�� rroaea,ai sots. _ �reuagei
e�d9�e ��aim.os e�agae seieoo..
Adopted Budget - . - . - -
Budget Amendmenfa
Adjusted Budgef ' ' . - .. -
Aotivity:
�(vrevious 2 v�s) 2071 YE 2012 Y�r Entl
' . �Funding Sourcas:� Prior to 20N� �Estimate 2012 Bud et . 2013 Bu et .P ect Total-_.
UnresMdetl Sewer Revenue - - �-- � - � �- 30�,000 "" =
,Grents(Fed.SYete,Lwal) . - - � - ..- -
BontlProceeds - - - - ._
Ofher
�TOtal Funtling Sources: - . . -- �-300,000 � .
Capital ExperidHurea: �
� DesiBn - - - 100,000 ,
Righto)Way - - - - .
Cons6uction 200 000.
Tolal ExpenAiWres:. . _ . . . 300.000 . _ -
Forecasted Projeet Cost: ,
row
zo�a xo�s zo�e m�� m�z"-zo��
Fundtng Sourees: - � -
UnresfictedSewerRevenue - -� - � 300,000
GraMS(Fed.Stete.LoceQ - - - � - -
� BondProceeds� - - - _ � .-. -
Ofher
Total Funding Sources: • - . � _ � 300.000�
� Capltal E�ryentliturea:.
Desi9+� - ' .' - 100.000
Righto/Way ' ' - ' '
� ConsaucNOn 200000
Total E:pa�itures:. - �- �- - 300�000
GramsJ Otlier Sourees: -
12g
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) Capi�al Facilifies Plen
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project rUe: 2009-2010 Sanitary Sewer Repair 8 RePlacement
Project No:_ cp0921
Project'rype: Non-Capacity(Repair and Replacement)
Projeot Manager. Elwell
Deseription:
The purpose of this projed is to replace or repair existing sewer main lines and,manfioles that are identified as defective.
The projects indudesmall project sites located throughout the City's sewen service area.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
BudgCt:. � ZOtt VTOAetual 2012 N.BuAget
Budgel E�ryenditures� Budgei Balanee
AdopfedBudget - - � - - ' -
BudgetAmendmems
AdjusteC&idget - - - -
AGZIVIh/: � ..
. (Prevrous 2 Vrs) J2011 YE � 2072 Year End
Punding Somees: Pdor to 2071 Estlmate .2012 Bu et 2013 Bud Pro'eet Total
� UnrestnctedSewerRevenue 714,900 - 23J00 � - 138,000
Grsrrts(Fed.S�te.lacsl) ' - - - - �
BorMProteetls - 300,000 462.000 - 762,000
Other
- Total Funding Sources: H4,900 300,000 485,100 - 900.000
Capltal Ezpendltu�es:
Dasign 114,900 50,000 -� - 164,900 �
RighlolWey � , - - - -
' Construcdion 250 000 d85 100 735 100
Total ExpendiW�es: � 11q900 300.000 - 485,700 �• 900.000
Forecasted Project Cost:
T�
2014 �zots . 2016 2017 zo12-2otL �
Funtling Sources: - - -- - �
UnresMicfedSewerRevenue - - - - 2g,tpp
GrerMS(Fetl.SYate,Local) - - - ' -
BondProceeds - - - - �462,000
Ofher
TotalFuntlingSources: • �- -� . q85,tpp
Capltal Expendkures:
Deslgn� - - - - .
Right o/Way� ' -� - -
Consauctlon - 485,100
. � Tofal Expendkures: � ' , • -� � 485,100
Grants I Other Sources:
129
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SEWER FUND (431) Capltal Facilities Ptan
Six Year Capltal Facilities Plan,2072-2017 Eeterprise Funds
Project Tit1e: Sewer Long Term Debt �
Projed No: cpl000c
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Improvements)
Project Manager. TBD
Deseription:
Funding allocated to pay for long-terrn debt 2012-2017 is as follows:
PW-04-691-001 Aubum Way South Sanitary SewerReplacement $681,000
PW-OCr962-003 Aubum Way South Sanitary Sewer Replacement $1,150,200
2010 Bond Revenue $2,496,600
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: '
PWTF Long-Tertn Debt Service
Budgat:. zott vroaewai 20�� . ii eudgee
', � Budget Ezpendilures Budget Balanee..
. Adopted Butlget - - - -
" " Budget AmerMmerrts -
. Ad/usted Budget - - - -
ACtfVlty:
(Prevloua 2 vrs) 2011 YE 2U12 Year:EM
� Funtling Sourees: Pdor to 2011 � Estlmate 4012 8ud et -2013 Bud et _ ebt Sotal�..
� UnrestrMted Sewer Revenue 296,350 562,900 592,500 732200 �---1;471',750�
' Grents(Fed,Stata.Loeaf) . . - ' ' .
BorM Pioceed9 ' ' ' ' '
Other
To1aIFunAingSourees: �296,3� 562.900 592,500 7�,200 . . ..�"1,471.,750.
CaPiml F�anCM+ras: � � �
� Design ' - ' ' '
, RigAt of Way - - - - -
Long-Term Debf Serviee 298 350 582 900 592 500 732 200 .7 471 750
�TOtal E�endkurea: 298.350 582,900 592,500 73Z,200 � 1,471�,750
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
. 201! 20'IS 2016 2017 � 2072-201Z..
Pumling Sourees: - � - -- �
UnresWcted.SewerRevenue 730,200 728,300 727,000 817,600 4�,327,800
� Grents(Fed,Sfate,Local) -� - - - . -
Bond Proceeds - - • ' . -
Otlier
Total Funding Sourees: 730,200 728.300 M7,000 -817,600� , 4,327,800
CaPitel E�endltures: ' .
pB�9� - _ _ _ �
RigMO(Wey - - - - -
Long-Term Debt.Servlce 730 200 728 300 727 000 817 800 4 327 800
Tofal bcpandilures: 730,200 728,300 M7,000 877,600 4,327.600 �
G2�rts/Other Sourcas:
130
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE
CurreM Facilities
The City's stortn drainage service area encompasses the municipal boundaries of the City. For
management pu�poses the serVice area is divided into sixty drainage sub-basins..The: City's
drainage system consists of a combination of closed conveyance pipes and open dRch
conveyance facilities, wRh six pumping stations. Table SD-1 Facilities Inventory lists tliefiacilities _
along with theircurrentcapacities and location.
LeVel of Serviee (LOS)
The City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design
criteria, for the City's stortn drairiage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25-
year/24hour design stortn capaci4y within the sixty drainage sub-basins.
Capital Facilities Projects and Finaneing
The City's storm drainage facilities anticipates fou� capacity projects in the amount of
$3,840,900, thirteen non-capacity projects totaling $15,153,100 and long-term debt .
totaling $2,573,500 for a 6-yearplanning expectation fotal of $21,567,500. Table SD-2
shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for storm drainage facilities during the six
years 2013—2018.
131
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-1
Facilities Inventory
Storm Drainage Facilities
cnPAC�n
Feet of Feet of
FACILITY Acres Plpeline O n Channels ,_ LOCATION
_ _ _--Drainage _ ,
��
A 484 22200 1,200 SeeCityofAubum's
AA 408 22,000 24,Q00 Comprefiensive Drairiage
AAA 296 ^ " Pfan. Dec. 2009
B 861 52,800 0
BB 11 1,400 0
' BBB . 68 ° -
, C � 835 51,500 2,30D ,
CG 227 • ,
CCC 991 ° "
D 168 12,700 6,000
DD 231 • *
DDD 58 ' `
- E 657 71,500 14,300 -
EE 588 ' •
EEE 287 " "
F. 83 5,900 0
FF 409 • `
G 135 12,700 0
GG 190 8,800 1,700
H 555 24,300 2,100
HH 419 0 0
HV 66 8,400 0
I 241 34,000 2,600
II 304 0 0
J 257 2,200 0
JJ 1.t58 • •
K 266 14,000 1,000
KK 391 0 0
L 87 21,500 600
LL 189 ' •
LS 1,137 ' "
M 553 4,500 0
MM 332 0 0
N 122 900 0
NN 549 • •
NNN 175 ° "
O 176 25,200 11,300
00 1,401 " ••
P 190 6,300 2,100
PP 110 • `
PPP 161 3,200 6,500
QQ 334 9 300 3,000
132
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-1 (eontinued)
Facilities Inventory
Storm Drainage Facilities
_ ca,Pacirr-- - -
Feet of Feet of
FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION
R 46 7,100 0
RR 249 " "
S 266 16,000 5,700
SS 326 . ° "
T 692 ' '
TT 135 9,300 1,000
U 361 ' •
UU 471 " "
V 552 11,600 . 15,000
W 65 8,600 0
W W 7O « ..
X 32 " •
� � 777. ww �w ..
YY 324 •» ••
YYY 105 0 0
Z ' S7 8,700 0 '
ZZ 950 " ' "
ZZZ 243 0 0
ToW l 21,881 476,600 100,400
InsuTficierrt data in basin
Insuficie�rt data due to recerrt annexaUon of basin - -
FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION
Pum Stations: � •
Street SE Pump Station#1 5,300 5000 blook A Street SE
Street SE Pump Station#2 1,380 A Street SE near SR-18 and
BNRR overpass
ubum Way S Pump Station#3 1,000 Aubum Way S near SR-18
and BNRR overpass
Brennan Park Pump Station#4 ' • 20,200 Brannan Park
Emerald Corp. Park Pump Station 6,500 GStreet NE near 42nd SVeet
est Main SVeet Pum Station 1,200 1420 West Main SVeet .
133
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
STORM DRi41NAGE DIVISION
� � 2012 2013 � 2014 2075 2016 2017 Total.
�CaoaciN Proieets: - - --— ��-� �---- -
1� S_296th Sheef Pond Expansion,Phase 7 &2 � . . ,
� Capital Costs ' � .550,000 - - 1,1�0,900 - - 1,720,900
Funding Sources� �
. Storm�Fund 550,000 - - 1,170,900 - - 1,720,900 �
Bond Proceeds -
2�Bypass at 2nd and G Street SE
Oapitel Costa - 200,000 800,000 - - -� 1,000,000
Funcling Sources: '
Srorm Fund - 200,000 800,000 - - - 1,000,000
BondProceeds - �
. 3 BrysCo'vePoml.Ezpansion - ------ - —�� �
Capital Costs 75;000 - 445,000 - - �520,000
Funding Sources:� . �
� Srorm Fund 75,000 - � �445,000 - - - :520,000
� Bond Proceeds - �
4 Port of Seattle MitlgaLfon ProJeet�. �
, Capital Co"sts . . 600,000 - - - - - 600,000
. Funding�Sources:
Srorm Funtl - - - - - - - -
� Other(Port of Seattla Mit.) � 600;000 800,000
'SubtotaL CaoaclN Prolects:
Capital Costs 1,225,000� Z00,000 1,245,000 7,170,900 - - 3,840,900 .
Non-CaoaciN Prolects:
5 SCADA(Telemetry)Upgrades- �
Capitel Costs � � , 200,000 - - - - - Z00.000
. Funding�Sources: � ,
Stortn Fund - - - - - - - .
� � . Bond Proceeds � 200;000 - - ___200,000
6 White RNer Stortn Pump Statlon RePlaoemeM - � .. . � . _ .
Capkal Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5.000
Funding Sources: � � ��
StortnFund - - - - - - -
.- Bond Pmceeds . 5,000 - - 5,000
7 Pipeline Repair/Replacements
Capifal Costs� �- 650,000 450.200 463,700 477,600 492,000 506,70D 3,040,200
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund 650,OD0 450200 �463,700 4P,600 � 492,000 506,700� 3,040,200
� Bond Proceeds - �
134
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
Tns�so-z
� ' ' � 2012� �2013 2D14- � 2015 2016 2017 , �Total
Non-Caoackv Proiects: � -
8 Aubum Way South Flooding.Phase 7 &2
Capital Costs 1,638,000 - - - - - 1,B38,000
Funding Sourcas: � -
Stortn Fund 7,638,000 - - - - - 1,638,000
Bond Proceeds �� - - - � - - �
9 30th Street NE Area Flooding,Phase 1
Capital Costs 250,000 2,697,000 - - - 2,947,000
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund 250,000 2,697,000 - - - - 2,947,000
Bond Roceeds - - - -
10 30th Street NE Area Flooding,Phase 2
Capital Costs - 75,000 595,000 - - - 670,000
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund - 75,000 595,000 - - - 670,000
Bond Proceeds � - ' - - - -
11 30th SVeet NE Area Flooding,Phase 3
Capital Cosls - - - 1.154.000 - - �1,154.000
Funding Sources:
Starm Fund - - - 1,154,D00 - - 1,154,000
Bond Proceeds �
12 West Main Street Pump Station Upgrade
Capital Costs - 1,135,D00 - - - - 1,135,000
Funding Sources: .
� Storm Fund . 1,135,000 - - - - .1�,735,000
Bond Proceeds - - - -
13 Street Utllity ImprovemeMS �
Capital Costs 118,500 225,100 231,900 238,900 246,tOQ 253,400 1.313,900
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund 118;500 225,100 231,900 238,900 246;100 253,400 7,375,900
Bond Proceeds
14 Regional Drainaga ImprovemeM Projecfs
Cepital Cos1s - - 300,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000
Bond Pmceeds - - � - -
15 Maintenance 8 Operations Expansion
Capital Costs - 300,000 - - - - 300,000
Funding Sources:
Startn Fund - 300,000 - - - - 300.OU0
Bond Proceeds - - - -
135
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE SD-2(continued)
� .2012 2013 2074 �2015 2016 '2017 Total
, Non-Caoaeitv Proieets: . . . � . - - --
16 MII�Creek Wetland 5K Restoratlon �
CapitaPCosts 750;000 - - - - - 750,000
Funding Sources:
Stortn Fund 750,000 - - - - 750,000
� -Bond.Proceeds �
- .� SuMota4Non-CacaciNProlecffi: �
Capital Costs 3,611,500 4,862,300 1,790,600 2,370,500 1,238,100 1',260,100 15,153,100
Lona�term Debt . � . .
17 Storm long�erm Debt
Long-tertn Debt 335,500 451,700 451,900 451,400 451,300 431;700 2,573,500
Funding Sources:
Storm.Fund 335,500 451,700 451,900 451,400 451,300 431;700 �2,573,500
Bond Pmceeds . � . . ... . . . ..
SuMotal.Lona-Tertn�Debt: , � .
Capiql Costs 335,500 451,700 451,900 451,400 451,300 .�431,70_0 � 3,573,500
SUMMARY:
GAPRALCOSTS
. � Capacily Projects 1,225,000 200,000 1,245,000 1,170,900 - - 3,840,900
Non-CapacityProjects 3,611,500 4,882,300 1,790,600 2,370,500 1,238,100 1260,100 15,153,100
" Long-term Debt 335,500 .451,700 451,900 . 451�,400 451,300 431,700_ � 2.573,500
Total Costs 5,17Z,000 5,534,000 ".3,487,500 3,882,800 - 1,689,400 - 1,691,800 � 21,587,500�
FUNDING SOURCES:
- SMrrtiFund 4,367,000 5;534,000 3,487,50D 3,992,800 1,689;400 � 1,691,800� 20,762,500
� � Bond Proceetls 205,000 - - - - . - 205,000
Other(Port of Seattle MitJ 600,000 600,000
Total Funding 5,172,000 5,534,000 3,487,500 3,992,800 1,689,400 1,691,800 21,567,500
136
Ciry of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE:FUND (432) . Capital Fecllities Plan
Slx Year CaplfalFaeilides PIan,2012-201Z EMerprise Eunds
eroject Titie: S.296th Street Pond Expansion, Phase 1 S 2 �
Project No: cp1013
Projed Type: Capacity -
Project Manager. Leah Dunsdon
Description:
� Phase I of this proJect will expand the current deteMion�capacity from 4 ac-ft to 8 ac-ft of storaga.. Phase I I will.further expand the
capacity to 15 ac-ft of�storaga. � . , �
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on OperaHng Budget:
No signficant impac[.
Budg2t: . 2011 YTDAetual 2ot2 �1i8uaget
� Budget _ Expentlkure8 Budget Balance
' Adopted8udget '. �- ' -
� Budget Ameridments
. ..Ad/usted Budgef - . ' ' '
AGtivny:
� 2071 YE 2012 Year End
Fundi�Sourcm: Prior to 20N Estlmata 2012 Bud M -� 2013 Bu Pro Totel
Unrestrlctetl Storm Revenue ' 10,200 " 50.000 550,000 - 810200
Grents(Fed,State,Loeal) - - - , - -�
- .Bond Proceeds � - - .- . - ' .
O[her
Total Funtling Sources: 10.200 50,000 530,000 . - 610.200 .
CapNal Expanditures:
Design 10,200 - - - 10,200
RigMWWey - - - -
ConsVUCtion 50000 550 000 600 000
� TotalExpenditures: " 70,2D0� �� -�-50,OU0 550,000 - 610,200
Forepsted Projed Cost:
7Mal
2074 2075 2078 2077 Y012•2017
FunAing Soureea: ' � � ' �
�UnresMCteOSYOrmRevanue - 1.7�0.9U0 - ' �1.720.900
� -� GrenLS(Fed,SYaOe.Gncel) _ �. _ - - -
�BondProceeds - - - - -
ane�
� Tofal Funding Sourees: ' - . 1,170,900 - . - 7,720,800
Cepitel Expentliwres:
� Design � - 100,000 - - 100,000
. . RigMWWay - 150,000 - - 150.000
, � Constructlon 920 900. . 1�470 900
� . � - Total Expendih�ms: . _. _- - - 7.170.80D .' ' . 1,72Qy00.
Granb/Ofher Sources: ' � .
137
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM'DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capnei Faeihties Ptan
SIz Year Capltal Faclllties PIan,2012-2017 ' Er�teryrlse Funds .
Project'riUe: Bypass at 2nd and G Street SE
Project No: CplODOc
Projed Type: Capacrty
Project Manager. TBD
Description:
This�project will install a parellel bypass pipe to convey upsVeam flows around a loplized low spot loptad at 2nd and G Street SE: The
. . .. _ ,. . ._ . . - - -
existing line will serve to drain the loplized low spot. � � - .
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
No signficant impact.
Budget zo�� rrDnemal zot2 tteudge�
_ � , . Butlget F�cpenCituren Budget Balance�
Adopted8udget - � . -� � • -
BudgetAmendmerrts - - " �-
Adjusteil8udget - - � . . -
AGtlVity:
' • 2011 YE - 2072 Year End
� . . Funding Sources: Prior M 2011 Estlmate 2012 Bud - 2013 Bud eL - Pra eet Total
Unrastdcted Stomi Revenue �- - � - . � -' - � �200,000 - � �
� Granta(Fed,State,LOCaI) ' - ' '- � . . '.
Bontl Proceeds - - - - � -
Other
Total FunNng Sourees: - - � - �200,000�" - - _
CaPltal E�endkures: -
� �Design - - - 75,000 -
Right of WeY ' _ ' ' '_
Consbuctlon 125000
. Total Fxpendltures: - - - � 200,000 -
Forecasted.ProJect Cost: -- .
� . -�Total .
' 2014 2075 2078 2017- - — -2012-207Z .
Funding Sourcas: ._ . � . � .'
Unresfnc[etl5tomiRevenue 800,000 - � • ' �� , 1,000,000 �
. GreMS(Fed,Stete.Locall - - • ' • � -
Bond Proceeds - - - ' -
Other
� Total Funding Sourees: 800,000 - • �� - ' • -� 7,000.000 '
� Capkal Expenditures: . . . �
pesign 175.000 ' -. - . 250.000 ��,.
Righto(WaY ' ' ' ' '
Conshuctlon . 625.000 . 750000
Total EryendRures: B00,000 - � � • . • 1,000,000,
Grarrts/Other Sourees: �
138
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Cap�m� Facuines P�an
SIx Year Capital Facflitfes Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project 7itle: Bry's Cove Pond Expansion, Phase 1 $2
Project No: cp1013
Project Type: CapaCity
Projed Manager. Leah Dunsdon .
Des¢ription:
Phase I of this project wiil expand the current detention capacity from 0 ac-ft to 1 ao-ft of storaga. Phase II will furthar expand the
capacity to 2.3 ao-ft of storage.
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operatlng Budget: -� �
No significant impact.
BUdgEt: � - 20N YTD Actual 2012 N Budget
. . . � Budget .Ezpandltures Budge! Balanee
� Adopted Budg�e! . - , . - ' -
Budgef Amendnierits . - -
Ad/usted�8udgef - �� - - -
ACUvity:
� - � 2011 YE � 2012 Year End
FundinBSoureea: � � �Prlorto2017� � Estimate 2012BUd et� 2013Bud et Pro'eetTotal .
UnresMCtedSYOrmRevenue - 3,360 -- 25,000��- 75,000 � - � 103,360
G/ants(Fed,SYafe,LOeal) - - - - - _
,BondProceeds - - , ' - -
O(her
Total Funding Sources: 3,360 25A00 75,000 - � 7IXi,960
Capifal Ezpenditurea:
Deslgn 3.360 - ' - - 3,360
_ RlghlolWeY . .. . ' . ' ' ' '
Consbuction � 25 000 75 000 100 000
. Total Expenditures:_ 3,360 25,000 75,000 - . 103,860 �
Forecasted Projed Cost �� - �
Total
.2014 2014 2016 1077 .2072-2017 �
Funtling Sourees: � � - - - -- �- � � .
UnresMcted SMrtn Revenue . 445,000 • - - 520,000
Giants(Fed,SYete,local) . . - • - - -
BondProceeds �- - _ _ .
Otlier
7ota1 Funding Sourees: . I45,000 ' ' ' ' S20.000
Capital Ezpendihmes: � �
� Design 75,000 _, . _ - - • 75,000
RigM o/Way � � - • - - - _ ,
. Construetion 370 000 445 000 ��
Total Expenditures: . 445,000 . - • 'S20,000 �
� Granfs/OUrer Sources:. - --
139
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capira� Faei�h�es,P�an
Six Year_Capital Facililies Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project Title: Port of Seattle Mitigation Project
Projec[No:� Cp�OOat -.
Projed Type: CapaCity
Project Menager. TBD
Deseription: •
Unident�ed Project for future I St NE Improvament. Project initieted through Port of Seattle.agreement. .
Progress Summary:
,
, FuWre Im aet on ratin Bud .
P � 9 9�'
' Budget: � _ 20H YTD AeSUaI 2012 � 11 Budget
� . Budget Fxpendkures . _ _��B�dget- —._. _Belanee..--
. . . AdoptedBudget _ . . _ .� - - -
� Budget AmerMmeMS - � -
. ' Adjusted Budgef - - - -
AC�VI�/: . . - - _-: _ __
, . 20N YE 2U72 Year End�.
_ .
Funding Sources: PAw to 2011 Estimata 2072 Budget. -2073 Bud eY. Pro eet ToTal �
� � UnresMCfetl Storm Revenue - - - � - � �
Grants�(Fed.SYate.Locel) - - - . . �
Ofher(Po?o/SeaHle M'digation) - 600 000 � 600 000.
ToUI Fumling Sources: - - 600.000 - 600.000
� Capltal.E�enEltures: ' .
. �Desig^ ' ' ' ' '
. RightofWay - • - - -
. Consiructlon 600 000. � � . _600 000
rorei�eimrea: - - sao,000 : . - eoo,aoo
Forecasted Project'Cosr
� ' . � � 7otal
2074 2075 2018 . 2017_- � ZU72-2077
Funding Soumea: � - � - -
.. UnresMcted.StoimRevenue ' ' ' ' ' '
� � GrentsfFed.State,Locaq - - - . �- -
. - , Other(Port o/Seattle Mifigation) - - - 600 000
' Total Funding SouFeea: - - -. . - . 600.000
_
.. Capifal ExpendHures: . . .
DesiBn - - - - -
� F2ighf.olWaY - - - - � -
. Consbuction - - 800 000
TOtal EryenAiNres: - - - - 800,000 �
� Grants/Other Sources: Port of Seanle Mitigation
140
- City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capltal Facilitles Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 EnterpriseFuods
ProjecCTine: SCADA(Telemetry) Upgrades
ProjectNo: c524a0
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity(Improvement)
Project Manager. Lee
Description: .
The Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition{SCADA,atso known as the"Telemetry"system)is in.need;of upgrading. The
existing system, based on an independentBCADA Assessment Study and ihe vulnerebility study, has numerous obsolete
components and does not atlow control of the Sewerand Storrn Utiliry stations. Upgrading the portion of the system utilizing
antiquated equipment;while_rtiaintaining.the portions of equipment that are compati6le with the newer technologies. The
new system will utilize an open architedure so the Giry is no longer reliant on a single vendor for repairs and maintenance.
RFP wa's sent in 2Q06 and consWction began in 2007.
Progress Summary:
� Future Impad on Operating BudgeY.
None
Budget: m�� rroa�uai zot2 �reueeee
, e�a�e �oa+wr�8 Budge! se���
Adopted Butlget _ ' - - '
Budget Amendmenls
� Adjustetl9udjjet - - - -
��: .
� 2011 YE. . 2p12 Year End
Fundi�g Sourees:� Prior W 2071 . Estlmate 2012 Bud et '2013 8utlget Pro et 7otal
UnresWcted Stomr Revenue 67,850 - - � - 87,850
6rants(Fed,Slate,localJ - - - � -
BondP/oeeeda - 458,000 200.000 - 658,000
OMer
Total Funding So�rees: 67,850 458,000 200.000 - 725,850
Cap(tel Ex�xndNures:
Oesign 67,850 - - - 67,850
R7gMa/Way - - - - -
Construcfion � 45B 000 200 000 658,000
Tofal Expend'AUrese � � 67,850 458,000 200,000 • 725,850
Forecasted Project CosC
Total
. 2074 2015 2D18 TA'17 2012-2017 �
FunAi�So�uees: �
UnresWUed Stam Revenue � - - - - - �
GraMS(Fed,SYete.LOra9 ' - - - �
Bontl Proceeds - - - - 200,000
Other -
Total Funding Sourees: - - - - 200,000
Capltal Expe�Mitures:
Desi9n � - • - - ,
RlgM o/WaY ' - ' - -
� Consbucfion 200 000 ,
Total Expa�itures: • - . - 200.000
Grents/Other Sources: - - � ' ' �
141
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capltal Facilkies Pian
Six Year Capltal Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project TiUe: - White River Storm Pump Station Replacement
Project No: cp0817
Projec[Type: Non Capacity(Replacemerrt)
Project Manager. Jacob Sweeting
Descriptiom
The existing storm water pumping statlon buift in 1981, is in need of replacement: A recent conditions assessment of all five
sform waterpumping stations indicates that this building is in very poor condition and should be demolished. The:curren4-,
pumping capacity is marginal to meet the pumping demand. Long terrn maintenance issues such as pump
ieplacemenUservicing,electrical deficiencies and ladc of potable water service can be addressed through construction of a
new station.
Progress Summary:
Futurelmpactbn Operatlng Budget: --• -
No signifcaM impact. - ,
BUdgBt: 2011 YTD AeWal 2012 11 Budget
, Budget Expendiwres .BuAget Balanee_. .
� Adopted Budget - - � � - -
Budgef AmerMments _ -
Atljusted Budget ' ' ' '
HGtivity: .
2011 YE 2072 Year.Erid
Funding Sources: Prior to 20N EsBmate 2072 Bud et 2013 Bud et P eet Total
UnresMcted Slorm Revenue � �556200 - - - 556,200
Grents(FedState.local) - - - - -
BondProceeds - 2,645,000 5,000 - 2,650,000
Ofher
Total FunCing Sources: 558,200 2,845,000 5,000 � - 3,206,200
Cepital F�enditures:
Design 556,200 - - - 556,200
RghtolWaY - - - - .
� Cons6vction 2.645,000 �5�000 .. 2650UOU
Total Expenditures:. 556,200 2,845,000 �5,000 - 3;206,Z00
' Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
7ota1
201d 2015 �2016 2017 2072�-21N7
. Funding Sourcea: -
� UnresMUed Sfortn Revenue - - - - -
Grants(Fed,Stafe.Local) - - - - -
� BondPmceeds� • - - - 5,000
ONer
� Total Funding Soureas: - - - - � 5,000�
� CapMal EzperrctlWres:
�� - - - - -
RigM o/WeY ' ' ' ' '
Cons6ucfion 5 000
Total Ezpenditures: - - • - _5,000
� .GraMS/�Other Sources:- . � ... �
142
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE"FUND (432) capfm�Faei�ities P�an
Six Year CapiTal Facilities Plan,2012-2017 ErRerprise Funds
Project Tine: Pipeline Repair 8 ReplacemeM Program .
Projec[No: cP7000[
Projed Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Description:
Projec[s ident�ed as those requiring replacement of existing infrastructure. These projects support street repairs and other
utility replacement programs, requiring coordination. . 2017 CP1109
2011 Stortn Pipeline Repair&Replacement$165;000
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
No sign�cant impad.
BudgEt: - �20t7 YTDACtual 20t2 1TBudget.
Budgat Expenditures Budget Balsnee
� Adopted Budget - - - - - -
Budget AmerWmertls
ad�usred s�c - - - -
Aetivlty:
�. (Previoua 2 vrs) 2011 YE 2012 Year End
Funding Sourees: � PNor M 2071 Estimate 2012 Bud - -_ 2073 Bud e! Pro'ee!Total
� UnrestdetedSWm�Revenue � -� 679.800 650,000� 850,000 450,200 1,979,800
GreMS(Fed.SYate.Locep � ' - � - . - '
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
OMer
Totnl F�mding Sou�eea: � 879.800 650.OUD 650.�0 � 450,200 1,979,800
CapMal Expenditures: .
Design 317,800 100,000 100,000 50,000 517,800
RightofWay , ' . " ' ' ' '
Conshuctlon 382 000 - 550 000 . 550 000 400 200 1 482 000 �
Total�E:penAidires: � 878,600 650,000. 65D,000 450,200 1,878,800
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Total
2014 2015 2016 2017 2072-2017
Funding Soureea: ' �
UnresMGed Storm Revenue � - 483,700 477,600 �492,000 506,700 3,040,200 '
GreMS(Fed,Stere.Locaq . . .- � - -
Bond Proceeds • - - - -
Other
Total FunCing Sourees: 463.700 �477,BW 492,000 506,700 3,040$00
CepMal.E�endilures: . �
Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 350,000 '
RigMo/Way - � - - - -
� Conshuction 413 700 427 600 442 000 456 700 2 690 200
' � � Total Expendltures: 463,700 �477,800�� 482,000 �W6,700 3,040,200 �
� GraMS/Olher Sourees: � .
143
City ofAuburn Capital FacilitiesPlan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) cap��arFau��es P�an
Six Year Capifal Facllifles Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
_
Projed Tiue: Aubum Way South Flooding, Phase 1 8 2
ProjedNo: Cp)oODc
Project Type: Non-Capacity -
Project Manager. TBD
Descriptfon: -
Gonshud conveyance improvement to 17th Street SE aspart of Metro realignment project. Replace existing conveyance
line.from A Street SE to K Street SE and add an add'Rional 7 ac-ft of storage within the existing A Street SE detention pond.
Progress Surimrriary:
Future Impaet on OperaBng Budget: - -- -
No significant impad.
Budget: 2ott rrn nea;a� 2ots »sue9ee
e�ayee ExPenanurea _ e�e¢ei- - —saia�ee—-
Adopfed Budget - . _ � - . . .
, Budget Amendments
, Ad%usfed Budget - - ' '
,AetlVky: — �—
� 2011 YE .2012 Year EnA
� Funtling8ourem: Prforto2011 Eetimam 2012Bud - 20136ud ef -Pro'eefTofal
� Unreshlcted Sfam Reveruie 484,100 - 1,638.000 '� - - 2:122,100
GreMS(Fad.Slate.Laeel) - - -� - -
Bond Pmceeds ' ' . ' ' '
Other
� Toml FunAing Sourbes: 484,100 • 7,638,000 . . .-. 2,122,100
Capltal ExpendRures: '
� - � .�Design 72,600 - 246,000 -. 318,600
Right oi Way • - � - - -
� � � Conshuitlon 411 500 1 392 000 - 1 803 500
TotalExpendifures: 484,700 - 1,838,000 � -� - � 2,72Z,100
, Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
' rom�
. 2014 2015 2076 2077 �2012�-2017
, � Funding Sources: .
. Unrestrlcted Storm Revenue - - � - � • 1�,638,000
� GreMa(Fed.SYete:Loeal)� - - - - �
Bond Proceeds • - - - � -
OMer
� . �To}a1.F�mding Sourcea: • ' ' . �� 1,638,000
� Capital Expenditu�o8: . .
' Design - - - . - 248.000
Righto/WaY - - '. . -.
- Conshuction . �7 392 000
� � Total ExpendiWres: - - - • 1,838,000
Grants I Other Sources: - ""� -
1�
City of A"uburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Faciu4ie's Plen
Six Year Capital Faeilkies PIan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding,'Phase 1 �
Project No: Cp�OpIX
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. TBD
Description• ,
This project would install a new storm drain from the NW comer of the airport property(MH 1107)to the existing Brannan ' '
Park storm purtip station.This pipe would replace the existing 30-inch'diameterpipe generally located along the 30th'St. NE
alignment and the northedy boundary of Brannan Park by improving the conveyance system's hydraulic capacity,therebq
redudng the potential for stortnwater flooding into the street
•3,820 feet of 42-in.-diameter gravity stortn drain from the NW comer of airport property to the existing Brannan Park storrn
pump station '
•Removal of floatable capture baffles upstream of the Brannan Park pump station(these are not needed to protect the
pumps and reduce the system's hydraulic capacity) '
Progress Summary:
• , Future Impad on Opereting Budget:
No signifipnf impad.
BudgCt: � � . �2077. YTD AeSUaI 2012 N Budget
... Budget� .Expenditurea. Budget Balanee
. Adopted Budget —_ - - . • -_ - ' '
Budget Ame�Mmertls�
AdJusted Butlget - ' - -
Activity:
' 2011 YE � 2072 Year End
Funding Sources: . � � �Prfor to 2071 Eatimate .2012 Bud 3�— ',2013 Butl et _ � eet Totel. �
� Unrestricted Storm Revenue - -� 250,000 � � 2,697,000 250,000
Grants(Fed.SYate,Local) � . - - - ' - -
Bontl Proeeetls . � - - - - - -
Other .. .. ..
Total Funding Soureea: - - 250,000 2,897,000 250,000
Capltal Expendkures:
Deslgn - - z50,000 B7,000 250.000 �
Right ol Way - - - - -
Conswalon . � 2,600 000
Tota1 ExpandHures: . - - 250.000 2.697,000 ' 250.000
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Toml
� . 2074 � .2015�. 2018 2017 2012-2017 .
Funding Soureas: �
Unreslricted Storm Revenue . - - - � - 2,947,000 �
Grents(Fed.Sfete.Locaq • - - � - -
Bo�m'Proceeds - - - - -
Otlrer
Total Funding Souroea: - - - � - - � 2,947,OW .
' � , CapNal F�pendltures:
� • � Dasi9n - - - - . 347�000
� . RigM ol Way � - � - - - -
_ , . .. ConsVUCNon _ 2 600000
Toeei�rwn�ros: . . . - z,9a�,000
Grants/Other Sources:
145
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Faeillties Plan
SixYear CaplWl Faci114fesPlan,2072-2017 Enterp�ise:FUnds
Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 2
Project No: Cp�odac ,
Project Typei Non-CapaCity
Project Manager. TBD
Desariptfon:
locate a storm drain Jine to capture stortnwater from the Mro residential developments at the west edge foi the form@r
CRISTA Ministries property.Currently,stormwater flows are discharged onto a depressed area:on Me CRISTA Ministries
property where its infiRration is limited by high groundwater levels that occur during extended periods of high flows.on Mie
Green River.Thisphase would conshuct a new stortn drain within I St. NE southward to�nnect into the upg2ded 42-inch
diameter(Phase 1)stortn drain near the intersection at I St: NE and 30th St. NE.The 42-inch diameter line would liave..
sufficient available capacity to convey the I St. NE flouus. Key components of Phase 2 include: •
• 1,760 feet of:15-inch diametergreviry storm drain
•Catch basin and incidental grading to collect stormwater at the upstream end of system
Progress Summary:
Fotuie Irrmpaot on Operetlng Budget: -- -
No signifioant,impad.
Budger. zo�� rrroauuai so�z �i euegec
suaeee �y,end�d,res suaaee eatence .
� � Adopted Budget ' ' ' '
ButlgetAmendmems �
� . . .Ad%ustetl Budget ' ' . - � -
AGtIVIFy: _
� � , ' 20N YE 2012.Year End
� Funding Sourees: �Pdor to 20H .Ectimate 4012 8� ,� �2073 Bud .. P ect Total. _ �
.' � "�UniestdetedSYorinRe�riue � -� - �� - � � �75,000 � - - - -
� Granfs(Fed.Stete.LOCeI) ' - - ' - ' ' -
Bond Pmceeds - - - � - -
Othe.
. �Tom�Puna�ng sourees: - - . . 7s,000 --- - - - - :
Capifel Ezpendkurea:. ��
� �Design - - - 75,000 . -
. . R(ght o/WaY - ' - - - � -
ConsWCtion �
. . .TOtalExpandituras: �- . .. . 75.000 .
Forecasted Projeet Cost:
Total
2014 2015 2016 2017 _2012=2077._..
� � Funtl�ng Sourees:� � - � -� - �- - - - � .
� Unrestdefed Storm Revenue 595,000 - - - 670,000
� Granta(Fed.Stafe.Loce!) - - - � � - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
Ofher
� Yotal Funding Soureas: � 595,000 - , : 670.000
Capifel Ezpenditires: . . . �
Design 25,000 - - - � 100,000
� Righto7Way • - - - -
� ConsWCtion 570000 570000
Total Expendlturea: � 595,000 - - - 670.000
Grenffi I Other Sources: -
146
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capiml Faouities Plan
SIx Year Capital Faeilities Plan,2012-2077 Enterprise Funds
Projea Tive: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 3
Projed No: cP�000c
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. TBD
Deseriptfon:
This project would reduce flooding in C St. NE by redirecting wet weather high flows soufhwarcl to fha 42-inch diameter
(Phase 1)storm drain'in 30th St. NE. By redirecting the C St. NE drainage into the Brannan Park system,these flowswould
no longe�be affeded by high water levels in Mill Cieek.To avoid deepening the Phase 1 gravity line(and extensive retrofits
to the Brannan Park pump station),this project would include a wet weather pump station and force main connection to30th
St. NE.The upgradetl 42-inch diameter pipe In 30th St. NE would have sufficieM capacity for these additional flows. Key
components of Phase 3 inGude:
•Wet weather pump station (estimated capacity of 4.S to 7 ds).
• 1,730 feet of 15-inch diameter force main
•Diversion struc[ure in C St. NE for pump staUOn
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budger
No sign�pnt impact.
Budget: 2oit vrnaeeua� 2oiz tt eua�
BuAget E�endkuros Budget Balanee
Adopted Budget - - - - -
Budgef AmendmenLs
- Ad%usted Budget - - - -
/1Ctivity:
� 2017 YE Zp12 Year End
Funding Sources:. Prior to 2017 Fstimaffi 201I Bu et 2013 Bu 'Pro aet Tofel
Unrestrleted S[onn Revenue - - - � - -
Grants(Fed,Stete.LoeelJ - - - - -
Bond Proceeds ' � - - - - - -
Other
Total Fu�uling Sourees: ' ' ' • ' '-
Wpital E�qiandkuns:
Desi9n - �- - - -
Righto/Way - ' - - . - -
ConsWCtlon
� Tohl Expendkures: .. • . ._. . . -
Foreqsted Projed Cost:
, � Totei
�2074� .2075 Z016 20�7 21N2-�0'I7 '
Funding Sources: . . . _.
UnrestrietedStormRevenue - 1,154,000 - - 1�,754,000
GraMS(Fed,SYate.Loea!) - -, - • -
.BondPmeeeBs � - �- - . • -
Other
Total Punding Sourcea: � • 7,154,000 . • , 1,134,000
Capifal Erzpend'RUrea: , - ,
Design - 154,000 •- - 154,000
� . RigMO/Way . . . -
Construction 1 000 OOD 1 000 000
� Total ExpenAiturea: - 1,154,0� - . � . 1.154;000
Grents/ONer Sources:
147
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities.Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Faeilitfes Plan
Six Year Capital Fadlities Plan,2012-2017 Enteryrise Funiis
_ -
Project Title: WestMain Street Pump Station Upgrade
Project No: cpl000c
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. TBD
Descriptfon:
. This project wili update the existing pump statfon by providing a redundant pump and telemetry system meeting level of service goals.
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
No signficaM impad.
Budget zo�t vronewai 2oiz i�spdge�:
� � Budget Expendkures Budget� - Balanee � '
- Atlopted Butlget - - - -
_ Budgef AmerMments - - --
Adjusted Budget - - ' .. ." .
ACNVIry:
. .. 2011 YE � 2012 Year HW
. . _ _._..... ..
Funding Sourees: Prior Eo 2011 Estlmate .2012 8ud et 2073 Bud et Pro et Total .
UnrestrictedStortnRevenue - - - 1�,735,000 -
- Grents(Fed,Sfare,Local) - - � - - -
Bond Proceetls ' ' ' '
aner
Total Funding Sourcas: - - - 1,135,000� � .
Capkal Expandilures: . .
Deslgn - - - 170,000 � -
' RighfolWey - - - - � -
� . Conshue6'on 985000-
Tolel F�yiendRUres: - - • 1,135,000 � � -.
Forecasted Projed Cost:
' Total
2014 2015 2016 �� M17 � � �.2072•2017
Funding Sources•_
- . Unres6ieled Slomi Revenue - - - - �1.195,000 �
G�sirts(Fed.SYate.Local) - - - . - . -
Bond Proceeds - - - ' -
Other
� Totaf FunNng Sourees: • - • •� ' �1,135,000
� Capltel EzPendkurea: �
Design - - - - 170,000
, Righto/WeY - - - - �-
' Consbuttion 9650�0 �
� Tofal Expandkures: - - - - 1,135,000 �
Grarrts/Other Sources:
148
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plcm
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Faeflitles Flan
Six Year:CapiWl Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 EMerprlse Funds
Project ritle: Street Utility Improvements •
Projed No: Cpxx�oc
Project Type: Non Capacity
Projed Manager. TBD .
Description:
Stortn drainage conveyance improvements in coordination with Arteriaband SOS improvements.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
No signficant Impact.
BUdgBt: . � , Z011 YTD Aetual 2012 11 Budpet
. Budget � E�endkures Budget Belarrce •
. . Adopted Budget - - - � - -
Budget Amendments - - '
- AdJusted Budget - - - -
ACtivity:
� (Previous 2 Yrs) 2071 YE 2072 Year End
� FuMinp Sou'se,s: Prior to 2011� Estlmata 2012 Bu .. 2019 Bud Pm ct Toml
' UnresfiefedSlorm�Revenue ' � 250.000 112,200 118,500 - �225,100 480,700
� GraMS(Fed,State.LoceQ - ' - - -
BorM Proceeds - - - - � '
aher
Total Funding Sources: - 250,000 N2,S00 178,500 - 224,700 480,700
Capifal Ezpendidires: � . �
�s�� so,000 zs,000 zs,000 so,000 �oo,000
wsnr or war - - - - -
ConsWCtion 200 000 _ . 87 2W .93 500 175 100 380 700
romi 6cpend�a,res: �so.000 - —atz,zoo ��a,soo ns.�oo aaa.�oo
Forecasted ProJed CosC
TMeI
� Z014 2015 2016 201Z . 2012-•2U1Z
� Funding Sourees: . . . . . . � � . .
� Unresfdctetl�StormRevanue � 231,900 238,900 246,100 253,400 1,313,900
Grenls(Fed.State.local) - - - - '
Bond Proceeds . - - - - '
Ofher
Totai FwMI�Sources:. � - 231,800 258,900 246,100 253,400 7,313,900
Capital Expenditures: ,
� �pesign 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 275,000
RightolWay - - - - -
Conatruotlon 181.900 188 900 196 10D. 203 400 ' . .1 U38 900
To}sl Expenditures: � �. : - 231.900 - -'298,900 246,100 253,400 � 1,519,900 �
Grants/Other Sources: � �
149
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plcrn
- STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Cap�i Fadlwes Plan
Six Yeai Capital Faeflities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
ProJedTic�e: Regional Drainage ImprovemenYProjects �
Project No: Cp7ooa
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Improvement)
Project_Mariager TBD
Description: : _-
Unidentified regional projects such as Mill Creek Restoration.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on OperaUng Budget:
None
, Budgetc� . 2011 YTDAeWaI � �2012 11 Budget.
� Budget Expenditi�ies Budgst Bslenee
AdoptedBudget - ' - ' -
, Budget Amendments.
Ad/usfed Budget - - - - �
Aetivity:
� 2017 YE 2p12.Year EM
� . Fu�f�Sourms: Priorto 2011 Estimafe 2012 6ud 2013 Bud et ._ xtTOlal... -
�� UnrestrictedSformReven�ie - - ---- � - ----
Grents(Fed.3Yate.LocaQ ' ' - - -
� - Bond Proceeds - - - " -
. � . . . OMer -
� � Totel_Funding Sourees: - - � . . . - -— .
. WPltal F�iPeMitures: ' .
- . Design - - - - -
RightolWey - - - - _ _
. .. . Conshuction �
-� �Total Btpenditures: ' - - ' '
. _ - _._ -___ _ - _ -
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
. . . , Total .
� .. . . .. 2014 2075 2078 201Z__ __ .2072-�207Z .
� Funding Sources: � � � � � � �-�
� Unres6icted Storm Revenue 500,000 500,000 500.000 500.000 2,000,000
� � Grants(Fed.State,Gocall - - . . . - . .
' Bond Roceeds - - - -
Ofher
Total Fw�ding Sources: 500,000 500,000 - 500.000 �500,OD0 - 2,000,000 �
. Cepltel Expenditu'eS: .
Design 75;000 75,000 �75.000 75;000 300,000
.. � . Right o/Way - • - - - .
� � � ConshucNOn 425,000 425000 425�000 425,000 1,700000 �
� Total EzpandHures: 500,000 SU0,000 500.000 500,000 2,000,000
GraMS/.Other Sources: - - .
150
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) cap�tal Facilkies Plan
SIx Year Capital Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project Tale: Mairrtenance and Operations Expansion
ProjectNo: cp�ooa
,Project Type: Non-Capacity(Improvement)
Projec[Manager. TBD
Deseription: ,
Funds allocated to remodel the existing'M&O buiiding into a more functional and maintainable facility.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
BUdgEt: . � . . ZOt1 YTDAelual 2072 Y1 Budga! �
, . - . Budget ExpendlNres BuApet Balanee -
AdoptedBudget _ - . . _ � _.
. . BudgetAmendmeMs
� AGjusted 8udget ' ' ' '
/�Ct1V1�/: . �
� � � -� �2011 YE 2012 Year End
Funtling Soureas: ' , ��Pr1or to 2017 � EsBmate T072 8ud et 2013 Bud et Pro eet Total .
� UnrestrlUed�SrormRevenue ' - _ - 300,000 -,
G/aMS(Fed,State.LoeaQ ' - - - -
BorM Proceads - ' - � ' -
OUrer
Total Funding Sourees: . - - -- 900,000 -
Ceplfal E7tpendituroa: . -
� " Deslgn , - - � - 25,000 -
RlghtWWey - - - � _ _ ,
ConstaWon � 275 000
Total E�cpendlturea: � - - - 300,000 .
Forecasted Project Cost: �
Total
2014 2015 2078 M17 2012-Y017
Funding Soureea: .
UnresMCted�StormRevenue ' - - - - �300,000
Grants(Fed,§tate,Locaq ' - - - � . _
Bond Proceeds - - ' • - � .
Other
" Tofal FunEing$ourw: - - _ - - 300A00
� Caplfal Expandilures: .
Desl9� - - - - 25.000 �I
Righ[of WaY - - - -
ConsWCtlon , - 275000
� Total Expendkures: � - . - , . - 300,000
Grarns/Other Sources: - . . . _.
151
City ofAuburn Capiral Facilities Plan
STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Caphai Fac'i�ities P�an
Six Year Capltal Facllities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds '
eroject raie: Mill Creek Wetland 5K Restoretion
Prujed No: CP0746
Project rype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. MderSEn
Description: •
Stream restoratlon project that includes Invasive species removal,stream channel restoretlon for improved conveyance and habltat,and
. . . . . ._ ..,. .
naUve plantings along MIII Creek between Maln Street andstream crossing�at SR 167. Project�.inGudes deslgn evaluation and poteMlal
capaoiry impro4ements at the 15th Street NW road culvert�for Mill Creek. -
Progress Summary:
Restoration of Mill Greek is onyoing and builds on stream restoration and habitat projects that have been pertortned in
previous years. One element of this effort is the restoration of tfie Wetland SK reach of Mill Creek.The City has ente2d into
a cost share agreement with Army Corps of Engineers to design to stream restoretion improvements forthe N/etland SK
, reach;property acquisition for construdion is scheduled to occur in 2012.
' FuWrelmpad on Operating Budget:
� � � BUdgft: . 2011 YTDAetual 201� ' 178utlget
a�ag� ���ax�,re8 s�ae� se�o .
' � Adopted Butlget - � � _ - . . - - - - -
Budgef Amendmants �
- � Adjusted Budget - - . - . � -
AetiVlty: —
' , . 20N YE . 2012 Vear Eed -
Funding Sourees: Pdor to 20t1 Estimate 2072 Bud .� 2013 Bud et�._ _.Pm eet:Tofal..
� UnresMcted 5rorm�Revenue - � - �750,000 � . . - � 750,000
� GranGs(Fed�SYete,Loce11 - - . - � � .- -
Bond Proceeds ' ' - � -
Olher
Total Fundirg Sourcea: - - 750,000 . � - � � 750,000
. . . Capltal E:pendlturas: � .
� Des18� - - - - - -
RIgM of Wey - - - _ . -
Constructlon 750 000 750 000
� - Total Expendifures: - - 750,000 .� -' , - - --� 750,000
Forecasted Project Cost
Totel
� �2014 2075 . 2076 2017 2012�-2017
. � Funding Sourees: . -- ..
Unrestnded�SrormRevenue - - • . . . - � 750,000
Grents(Fed,State,Locaq • - - � - -
BorM Pmceeds - - - . . -
Other - -
Tofal FunCing Sourcea: • - - -. 750,000
Capilal�.EzpendiWres: .
Desi9n - - - - -
RigM of Way - - - - -
Construdion 750 000 -
ToYa1�.Fxpendltures: - - - • 750,000�
Grents�!Other Sourees: �
152
City ofAuburn CapitalFacilities Plan
STORM FUND (432) Capital Facillyes Plan
Six Year Capltal Facillties Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise_Funds
arojectrrt�e: Storm LongTerm Debt
Project No: cplOaa
ProjeccType: Non-Capacify(Improvemerrts)
ProjecfMenager. TBD
Deseription:
Furiding allocated to pay for long-tertn debt 2012-2017 is as follows:
2005 Bond Revenue$484,800
2010 Revenue Bond$2,088,800
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operatlng Budget:
PWTF Long-Tertn Debt Service
BudgEt: -- - -� - � - 2011 � YTD Aetual 2012 11 Budget
Budgef . ExpendlNres Budget. Balanee
Adoptetl Audget . . . _ . . ' '
Budge[Aineridinerrts� . ' .
Ad%usted Budpet � - � - - -
ACtivity:
(Previoua 2 vra) 2071 YE-_ 201Y Year End
. Funding Sources: �Pdor to 2017 .EsNmate - �2012 Bud et �2073 Bud et Pro'ee!Total �
UnresMcied_SewerRevenue : . 96,200 -�325,400 �r -335;500 � — 451,700 . 757,100
� �Gronts(Fad,Stete:Locel) ' - _ - - � . _ .
Hond Proteetls - - - - -
�IBf
Total Funding Sourcas: 98,200 525,400 395,500 451,700 757,100 �
Capital Expenditures: � .
Desfgn � • - - - -
RightolWey� ' . ' � ' - '
Long-Term Debt Servlce 96 200 �325 400 335 500 a51 700 757 100
Total Expendkures: . 96,200 � 325,400 . 335.500 451,700 757,100
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Totah
. 2014 :.2p15 . 2018� 2017 2012-20tt
FundingSourees: ,r . . . -__' . . .. . .
Unres6ictedSewerRevenue � � 451,900 451,400 451,300 431,700 �2,573.500
GiantslFed,State,LOeel) - • - - ' -
Band P/oceeds � . � ' ' - - .
Other
Total Funding Soureea: � � 457,900 457,400 457,300 431,70D 2,57S,S00 �
CaplfalExpendituresr . , . --
Design - - ' - -
. .RigMO/Wey . _ ' - .
Long-Term Debt Service � 451 900 451 400 451 300 431 700 2 573 500
Total ExpendiLires: - 457,900 " 451,400 451,300 431,700 �Z,573,500 �
GraMS/OMer Souroes: � ��
153
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
... . �.N�n""Y.t�yy�. � / � .
� (�� l � ��^ ..'.�
CITY OF ,��:-----��-�� �
�. " -.--�" ���" -
�,.� �- -- �
,r�%,:` _�. -.�.
,�`°" .., �,�
.. - — �
�k �''�y: � �-
� _,...�.��...�'',,�''y'
�
�'
�k MORE THAN YOU I1vlAGINED �
;
154
City ofAuburn Capital FacilitiesPlan
SOLID WASTE
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum no longer has recycle drop stations facilities. The City now provides
curbside service through a vendor who fiandles the disposal.
� 155
City oJAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
�� � ���
CITY OF � �`'°��...+� -~��-'�`�
�y. � �.
�� -�
.�.-.°a_ ..✓ _„ty.
�..,...-.- ,_..r ..^" /
/ ...•-�"'' .�±. J-� ✓
' ---^-". �..
�
.��� ..r � ✓"" ==: ,� .
,P q�,w,...� _ ,�.
. � * . ';.�� .,,,, � .-„«- . . .
9 � MORE THAN YOLJ IMAGINED .
156
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
PARKS AND RECREATION
Current Facilities
The Gity of Aubum's park system consists of a total of 567.57 acres of neighborhood and
community parks, special use areas, open space, and linear parks (trails). The 150-acre
Aubum Municipal Golf Course is identified as a separate public faciliry in this report, and.is not
included in the Parks and Recreation in4entory.
� Tabie PR— 1 "Facilities Inventory' lists ail park and recreation land in the City's park system
along with their current capacity and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS provided by the City's park system represeMs the current inventory of City-
owned park acres divided tiy the 2011 Citypopulation of70,180. This.equates to 0.70 acres per
1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.25 acres per 1,000 population for community parks;
0.45 acres for linear parks, 2.84 acres for open space, and 0.77 acres for special use areas. ,
The proposed LOS provided by the City's park system represents the planned 2017 inventory of
City-owned paric aaes divided by the 2017 projected City population of 75,242, This equates to
0.77 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood pa�ics,3.82 acres per 1,000 population for
community parks, 0.42 acres'per 1,000 population for linear pai�k:s, 2.64 acres per 1,000
population for open space, and 0.72 acres per1,000 population:for special use areas.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing •
Parks and Recreation facilities include nineteen capital projects at a cost of$35,592,800. Table
PR—2a shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing 4he. ,
project detaiL
Impaet on Future Operating Budgetg
As Table PR—3 shows, operating budget impacts'of$1;354,000 are forecasted for parks and
recreation facilities during the six years 2013:—2018.
157
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-1
Facilities Inyentory
Parks and Recreation, Land
CAPACITX
FACILITY (Acres) LOGATION
Neighborhood Parks:
Existin Mvento :
ubumda/e Park 10.00 31700 108th NE
Ballard Park 0.70 37th &R Street SE
Cameron Park 3.90 LemonTree Lane&Academy Drive '
Cedar lane Park 8.30 25th&K Street SE �
Dorthy Botfiell Park 4.00 5701 Lakeland HiIIs Way SE
Dykstra Pai1c 1.70 1533 22nd Avenue NE
Forest Villa mini-park 0.20 17th&Fir Street SE
Gaines Park 1.40 11th NW 8 W Vailey Highway
lndian Tom Park 0.40 6th & Henry Road NE
Jomada Park 1.90 1440 U COUrt NW
Lake/and Hills Park 5.00 5401'Olive Avenue SE
Rotary Park 4.00 27th &Aipine Street SE
SCOOtie Brown Perlc 1.70 8th 8 Henry Road NE �
Shaughnessy Park 3.50 21st 8 Hemlock SE
Terminal Park 1.20 12th 8 C Street SE
Village Square 1.07 310th St SE @ 120th Ave
Total Neighborhood Parks 48.97
Pro osed Ca ac' Pro'ectsr
f ubumdale%I Park 9.34 29700118th Street SE.
Tota/Proposed Capacity Projects 9.34 � -
2017 Projected Inventory Tofal
-Nei hborhood Parks - 58.31
Community Parks:
Existin Inverrto :
Brannan Park 21.70 26th 8 M Street NE
Fenster/Green RiVer Access 13.40 10520 Aubum/Black Diamond Road
Fulmer Fieid 5.00 Sth & K Street NE
Game Ferm Rark 53.00 3226 V Street SE
Ga'ne Ferm Wildemess Park 20.00 2401 SE Stuck River Road
GSA Parfc 6.60 GStreet Sw & 15th SW
Isaac EvansPark 14.90 29627 Green River Road NE
Lea Hill Park 9.00 SE 319th & 124th Street SE
Les Gove Rark 20.50 11th&Aubum Way S
Mill Pond 4.00 600 Oravetz Road
Olson Canyon Farmstead 15.00 28728 Green River Road
Roegner Park 21.60 601 Oravetz Road
Sunset Park 15.00 1306 69th Street SE
Veterdn's Memolia/Park 8.50 Park Avenue&Aubum W ay N
Tota!Community Parlcs 228.20
158
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-1 (continued)
Pro osed Ca ac' Pro'ects:
Jacobson Tree Farm 29.04 13009 SE 294th Street
akeland HiOs 30.00 Ker"sey Way
Tofa/Proposed Capacity Prrojects 59.04
2077 Projeded InveMory Total
-Communi 'Parks- 287.24
Linear Parks:
Existin lnvento :
lnterurban Trail 25.40
Lakefand Hills Trail 2.30 5401 Olive Avenue SE
White River Trail 4.10
TotaLLinearParks 31.80
Pro osed Ca acit Pro ects:
None -
Tota/Proposed Capacity Pr%cts -
2017 Projected Inventory Total
- LinearParks - 31.80
Special Use Areas:
Existin Invento :
Bicentennial Park 1.40 SR-18 8 Aubum Way S
Centennia/ Viewpoint Park 0.70 600 Mountain View Drive
City Hall Plaza 0.90 25 W Main
Cfark P/aza 0.20 15th 8 Aubum Way N
Downtown Mini-Mall 0.10 E. Main 8 B Street SE
Mountain View Cemetery 50.00 2020 Mountain Vew Drive
Pioneer Cemetery 0.80 8th &aubum Way N
S/aughterMemoria/ 0.20 3100 Aubum W ay N
Total Specia/Use Areas 54.30
Pro osed Ca ac' Pro'ects:
None -
Tota/Proposed Gapacity Projecfs -
2017 Projected Inventory Total
-S ecial Use Areas - 54.30
Open Space Areas:
Existin lnvento :
C/ark Property - 25:00 1600 Orevetz Road
Game Farm Open Space 87:00 2400 SE Stuck River Road
Golf Course Open Space 42.00 29639 Green-River Road
Olson Canyon Open Space 45.00 28728 Green River Road
Total Open Space Areas 199.00
Pro osed Ca acit Pro'ects:
None -
Tota!Proposed Capacity Projects -
2017 Projected Inventory Total
-O en S ace Areas - 199:00
159
City ofAuburn CapitalFacili.ties Plan
TABLE PR-2A
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
PARKS and RECREATION
(Municipal Parks`Construction Fund) ,
2D12 2013 � �2014 2015 2016 .2017 Total
CaoeeiN Proiects: � . - _ -. - �. - � -
1 Perk Aequisitions/DevelopmeM �
CepitalCasts � � 470,OD0 100,000 �100,000 100,000 �00,000 100,000 970.000
Funding Sources: �
MunicipabPark Fund - - - - - - � �-
GraMS(Fed,State,Local) 350,000 - - - - . _� - 350.000
� -' � Bond Proceeds ' - ' - - - - '
� . _KC Prop 2 _ 120.000 100.000 .100.000 100.000 100.000 A00.000 . 820,000
Subtotal,CapaeMy ProJeeSS:,
Capltal Costs 470,000 700,000 700,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 � 870A00
Non-CaoaGev Proieets: . . .
2 Issac Evans Park
CapitelCosts' 25,000 - - - 70,000 . - 95,000
Funding Sources:
Municipal Park Fund 25,000 - - - 50,000 � - 75,000
Grants(Fed.State,Locaq - - - - - - '
Other(Park Imoact Fee) 20,000 � 20.000
3� Jaeobsen Tree Farm Site Plan � �
Capitel Costs - - 6,000,000 - -� 6.000,000 12,000,000
Funtling Sources: .
Munidpal Park Fund - - � - - -� -
G2nts(Fed,State,Local) - - 2,000.000 �- - 2,000,000 4,000,000
Bond Proceeds 4,000,000 4,UOO,UUO� 8.CG0,000
�4 FulmecParlclmprovemeMS �
Capital Costs - 50,000 - - - - 50,000
Funding Sources: �
Muniapal Park Fund - b0,000 - - - - - �50,000
Grants(FedState.Locel) - - - - - " - '
. Other(Parkimpact Fea)
5 Aubdm Communiry CeMer
c��mi coga ��,sso,000 - - - - - ��,�o,000
Funding Sources: ,. .
REET 1 679,100 - - - - 679,1D0
NMTC � 5J02.800 - - - - -. 5,102,800
Other(TBD) 1,878,100 - - - � - . - � 1,878;100
Other(OALICB) 8,000,000 - - - - - 8.000,000
Other(HUD108�Loen) 2,000,00� '2,D00.000
6 Veteren's Park Improvemenffi . �
�Capital Costs � - 100,000 ' - - - 100,000
Funding�Sources: �
Municipal Park Fund - 100,000 - - - ., 1G0,000
GraMS(Fed.State.Local) - - - - - � - . .
Other _
� 7 .Les Gove Impro4ements � - �- -- � � .
Capital Costs 25,000 - - - - . �25.U00
Funding�Sources: � ' '
Municipal Park Fund - - - - - - • �
� Grants(Fed,State;Locel) 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 �
Other
160
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-2A(continued)
zo�z zots zota -zo�5 zo�e . zo�i romi
NonCanaelN Proleets: � . _. _ , . _ . . . --� . -
- 8 Rotary Perk ImprovemeMs -
. CapltafCosts - 30,000 - - - �- 30,000
Funding Sources:
Municipal Park Pund - 30.000 - - - � - � 30,000
Grants(Fed.State,Local) - - -� - - - -
Other
� �9 Shaugh�ressy Park ImprovemeMs � • �
Cepital Costs 15,000 25,000 - - - - ' 40,000 �
Funding Sources:
Municipel Park Fund 75,000 25,000 - - - - 40,000
Grants(Fed,State,Locel) - - - - - - -
Other � � � � .
10 Mlse.Parks Improvemertls .
Capltal Costs 100;OD0 � 50,000 300,000 50,000 - - 500,D00
Funding Sources:
Munieipal Park Fund - . - 200,000 - - - 200,000
Granis(Fed;Slate,Local) - �- 100,000 - - - 70U,000
Other(Park Impect Fee) � 100;000 50,000 � � 50,000 200,000
� �N Cameron Park
� Capttel�Costs - 55,000 - - - - 55,000
Funding Sources:
Munidpal Park Fund - 55,000 - - .- - 55,000�
Grsnts(Fed.State,Loeal) - - - - - - - '
Other
12 Game Farm Park
Capitsl Costs 170.000 80.DU0 - - - - 250,000
Funding Sources: �
Munidpal Park Fund 150,000 BO,D00 _ - � - - - 230,000
Grants(Fed,Sfate,Local} 20,000 - - - - � �- - 20,000
Other
13 Galnes Park
Capttal CosLS - 9.500 ' - - - 9.500
Funding Sources:
Munidpal Park Fund - 9,500 -- - - - 9,500
Grants(FeC,Slete,Loeaq - - - - - - - -
Other
- 14'Roegirer Park � -
Capital Costs - „ - 60,000 - - - 60,000
'Funding Sources: � -
Munfcipal Park Fund - - 30,000� � - �- - 30,000
� Grents(Ped,State,Locaq - - 30,000 - - - .30,000
KC Prop 2 '
15 Aubumdele Park .
Capital Costs 75,000 - - ' - - � - 75,ODU
�Funding Sources: , � � . � .
' Munlclpal Perk Fund 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 .
Grants(Fed,Slate,Local) - - - - - - � -
� Other(OtherAgency} 50,000 � 50,000
-16�Aubumdale Park 11 . .
Capital Costs - 100,000 - . - - - 100,000
� � Funding Sources:
� Municipal Park Fund . - 50,000 . - - - - 50,000
. � � Grants(Fed,Slate,Loceq . 50,000 - - - - 30,000
� Other . _ . -
161
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-2A(continued)
2012 2013 2014 2075 2016 207T 'Total__..
Non-Caoaeitv ProieCS: . . . . . - --... -
17 Centenn{al Viewpolnt Park � .
Capitel Costs - - 35,000 - - - 35,000
Funding Sources: . -�� �
MunicipalPark Fund - - 35,000 - - - 35;000
Grents(Fed,State,Local) - - - _ _ - _ .
Other
18 BPA Trall Lea Hill . . . � . . - - � -- -
� � Capltal��Costs - 300,000� 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 ��700,000
Funding Sources: ��
Munidpal�.Park Fund - - - - 100.OD0 100,000 200,000 -
Grants(Fed,State,Lacal) - 150,000 - - - - �150,000
. KCProDZ - 150,000 100,000 100,000 :350,000
19 Lakeland Park#4 � . . . �.
Cepital'.Costs - - 300,000 300,000 - _ '800,000
' Funding Sources: - �
Municipal'Park Fund - - 150,000 150,000 - _ �.300,000
. �Grants(Fed,SNata,Local) - - 150,000 150,000 - - �300,000 �
omar
20 Willlams Pipeline Trall � .
� � Capital Costs - - - - 200,000 200,000 400,000
Funding Sourees:
� � MunicipalParkFund - - - - 10�.000 �100,000 . 200,000
. �Grents(Fed,State,Local) - - - - 100,000 � 100,000 200,000
Other - � �� - �-
�21 Lea HIII PaAc ReplaoemeM � � . �
� Capltal Costs 1,300,000 - - - - - 1,500,000
Funding Sources: � � � .
'MUnicipal Park Fund - - _ - - - _ .
. . Grent3(Fed.State.LOwq � � " ' " ' ' . " .'
Other(GRCC Relmb) 1,300,000 � ' 1,300,OU0
�22 Fenater Levee Setback,Phase 26 .
Cap(tal Costs 518.300 20.000 - - - - 53g;gpp
Funding Sources:
Munlcipal Park Fund - - - - _ _ . �
�Granta(FedStete,Locel) 491-,500 12,600 - - - - 504,100 �
-0ther.(Storm) . 26,800 7,400 - 34,Zpp
-Subtotel.Nont:aoaeltv Proiacla: . . � .
- Capltal6osts �9,886,300 819.500 6,795,000 450,000 870,000 8,300,000 S4,6T2,800
-
SUMMARYe. �
CAPITAL COSTS _ .
Capadty.Projects 470,000 100.000 100,000 100.000 100,000 '100,000 �970,000
Non-Capaciry ProjecLS 19.688.300 619.500 6,795,000 450,000 370,000 - 6;300,D00 34'.671,800
Total Cosfs 20,358;300 819,500 � 6,895,000 550,000 � '470,000 6,400,000- 33,592,SOD.
FUNDING SOURCE3: � �
MuniripafParkPund 215,000 399,500 . �415,000 150,000 250,000 200,000� 1,629,500
Granis(Fed;Sfate,LOCaI) 686,500 212,600 2,280,000 150,000 100,000 2,100,000 � 5,729,10D
NMTC �5,102,800 - - - - -� 5,102,800
� .REET 1 679.100 - - - - ' - 679.100 �
Bontl Proceeds - - 4,000,000 - - 4;000,000 8,000,000
KC Prop 2 120,000 250,000 200,000 200,000 100,000 100,000 � .970.000 �
Other 13,354,900 57.400 50,000 20.000 13,482,3�0
• Total Funding 20,358,300 919,500 6,895,000 . �550,000 470,000 6,d00,000 -55,592,800
162
City ofAuburn Capifal Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) - Capital Faoilkles Plan
Siz Year Capifal Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 . Capital projecls Fund
Project Title: Park Acquisitions/Development
Projed No: cpXX7oc
Projed Type: Gapacity '
Project Manager. Fabe�
Deserlption:
Land acquisiUons to occur based on demand and deficiencies including trails and corridors. '2012 budget includes purchase
of proposed West Aubum Park property.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Budget: - .zON � VTDAOtual 2012 ttBudget
� Budget Expenditures Budget � Balance
AdoPted Budgei ' ' ' ' '
� 8udget Arriendments
AdJusted Budget - - ' -
Adivity:
� �2017 YE . 2014 Year End
. Funding Sourees: Primto 2011' Estimata Z072 Bud et �201�Bud Pro eet ToTal. .
Municlpal Parks ConstrucUon Fund - - - . . - -
Grants(Fed,Stefe,LocaQ' 130,000 40,000 350,000 - 520,000
Bond Proeeeds - - - ' -
REET ' - -
- -KC Prop 2' � 230 000 40 000 120 000 . 100 000 390 000
TotalFunding Sourees: 360,000 80,000 470,000 100,000 970.000
Capital E�endMures: . .
Desigr+ - - - • '
RighlWWey - • _ _ _
ConsWctian - 360 000� �BO 000 470 OUO 100 000 1 O10 000 �
Total6cpetidltures: 360,OOD� 80,000� 470,000 100,000 910,000
Forecasted Projed Cost: '
Total
. � 2014 2014 _ 2D76 2017 205-2017
Funding�Sou�es: � - �
Municipel Perka ConsLUCflonFund - - - - _
Grants(Fed,Stete,LOeel) - - - 350,000�
BondPoOCeeds. ' • ' ' - _.
REET - ' - - -
� KC Prop 2' 100 000 100 000 100 000 10D U00 620 000-
� Tofal Funding Sources: � 100,000 700,000� '100,000 10D,000 �970,000
, CapNalExpandlWres: � . .
Design . ' - - - - -
� Right o/Way • - � - _
� � Consbue0on - 100 000 -]00000- 1U0000 100 000 970 000 �
Total Ezpendllures: 100,000 �100.000. 100,000 - � 100,000 970,000
G2nts/Other Sources: IGng CouMy Conservation Futu�es Graril(350K);KC Prop.2(120,000 per year). �
163
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS GONSTRUCTION FUND (321) •. capifal Faetlities Plam
Six,Year Capifal FaciiSies Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund:
Project Titie: Issac Evans Park '
Project Na CplOOa '
Projecc Type: Non-Capacity
ProjecFManager. Faber
DeseMption:. ,
Repair 4rail throughout park,develop reforestation plan.
Progress Summary:
Future lmpact on Operating BudgEK:
Increased mowing and utilities-$6,000
Budget: zo�� rroa,nua� 2o�z �� auaeec
Bud9et ExpendiNres Budget _ Balanee
� AdopfedBudget - ' - �- � �-
. . � Budget Amentlments . .
Adjusted Budget - - - - �
ACtlVity: .
20��ve zotz rear�,a
FundingSources: PAortoZD�7 Estimate 20126ud et 20136utl et P eetTOtal�
�MUnicipal Parks Construction Fund . � . - - � 25.000 - 25,000 �
Grents(Fed,Sfate,Locel) - - - - - -
� Bond Proceeds - - - -
REE7' - - - - �-
Other(Perk Impact Fee)' -
. _ �TotalPUnding Soureea:� . - . � 25.000 - . 25.000 .
' , Capital ExpenAltures:�. .
� ��9� - - - - -
Righto/WaY� ' ' ' ._ '
� - Construction 25 000 25 000
- TotalExpentlkures:�. �- - � 25,000 - 25,000.
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
roa�
- 2014 2015 2018 2077'_ ._ 2012-2077
� . . Funding Sources: . .
MunicipalParksConshuctlonFund - - 50,000 , �- 75,000� .
Grents7Fad.Stete�Lotall - - ' - � :_ .
8ond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - -
Ofher(PaAc Impact Fee)' - 20 000 2D 000
Total Funding Sources: - - 70,000 - 95,000
. Capital Expendkuras:
�� - - - - .
- Righto/WeY - - - - - � -
�ConsLUCtlon 70000 95 000
Total Expentlkures:. - - 70,000 - .95,000
-Grants I Other Sources: � .
164
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) ' Cap�tatFacil�t�esP�an
Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan,2012-2017 Capifal Projeets Fund
aroject rrtie: Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan
Project No: Cp0609
Projea Type: Non-Capacity
Projec(Managar: Fabe� -
Deseriptlon:
Implement Master Plan for the development of this 31 acre site.Lea Hill area is deficient in park aaeage.
Progress Summary: .
Future impad on Operatlng Budget:
No significant impad due to master plan. Future park development will resutt in maintenance and utility expenses
undeterminable at this time.
� Budget: � � � ' 2011 � YTD Actual 2012 11 Budget
� . . Budga! Expendllures BudBet Balanee
Adapted 8udget - � - � - � -- .
Budgef Amepdments � �
Adjusfed Budget - - ' -
ActiVity:
' 2017 YE 2072 Year End
Funding Sources:� � . . � Pdor to2071 . Estlmate 2012 Bud 2015 BuE et Pro ect Total�
MuNCipel PaAts ConstrucNogFund � ' � 25,321 - - - � - �-�- -= 25,321
Gra'rts(Fed�SYefe�Loce�J ' ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
Other(Development) , -
Total Fundf�g Sourees: 25,321 - - - 25,327
Capltal E�enditures: � � �
Design 25,321 - - - 25,321
�hr o�way - - - - -
Construefion .
Total Expenditures: 25,321 � - - - 25,327
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
. Tofal.
2014 _ _2015 . 2076 2017 2012•2017
Funding Soureas:. .
Municipal Perks Consfruc0'on FurM � - - - - -
Grants(Fed,Stete,LOteIJ 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 4,000,000
BondProceeds 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 B4OU0,000 .
REET - - - - _
_ Other(Development)
� � TotelFundingSoureea:�. 6,000,000 -� - - B4OOOA00 72,000,000
Gpital Expendimres:
Design 1D0,000 - - 100,000 Z110,000 �
Right o/Way . - - - - �
- ConstrucNon 5 900 000 � � � 5 900 000 11 800 000
� Total ExpendlWres:� 6,000,000 ' - - 6,000,000 12,000,000 �
Granis I Other Sources: . � �
165
Ciry of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPALL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capitai Paefilties P�an
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project Tive: Fulmer Park Improvements
ProjedNO: Cp7O00c
Projed Type: NOn-Capacity
Project Manager. FdbO�
Description:
Develop the new park amenities on land exchanged with the Water Utiliry.
Prog►ess$ummary:
Future Impad on OperaNng BudgeC �
Increased maintenance of approximately$5,000 annually
Budget: zo�t vTDneeual zo72 tieuagert
Budget. Ezpendilures Butlget �Balanee__
AdoptetlButlget � .- - - - -
Budget Amendments
AdjustedBudget ' ' . '� -
ActivrtY:
� 2011 YE 2072 Year End
. - Funding Sowees: Pdorto 2077.. Estimate 2012 BudgaL .2019 Budgef �Pro eG Total
�. � Munlcipel Perks ConsVUetlon Funtl - - - - - 50,000 - - � -- _ �
Grants(Fed,Sfete,lxaQ - ' - -� -
� BondPioceeds - ' - -� -
REET ' ' ' '
Other(Parlc Imped Fee)'
Totel Funtling Soureea: - - . - . � 50,000 -�
� Capital Expentlltures:
Design - - - -
Righf ol Wey - - - - -
' ConstrucA'on 50 000
, � Total Expenditures: - • - . SO.OW � -�
Foreeasted Project Cost: - '
rom�
2074 2075 2078 . 2077 ".$012-�2017.__
Funtling SDURes:� . -- -
Municipel Parks Cortshuetion FurM - - - - 50,000
GrarMS(Fed,Stafe,Locaq - - - - -
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
' REET - - - ` -
Other(Perk Impect FeeJ'
- Total FundMg Sourees:� � • , - 50,000
� CapNal Expendltuies: � .
���5�� ' - - �- -
RlghtolWey - - - -
Conshuctlon 50 000
Total Expendkures:- - - - - 50,000
Grarrts/Other Sou�ces: King CouMy Youth Sports graM$70K
166
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Faci�it�es P�an
Slx Yesr Capital Faoilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project Title: Aubum Community Center
Project No: cp0925
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. BuPke
Description:
Construction of a new 20,700 s.f.CommuNty Center faciliry and associated site improvements at Les Gove Park campus.
Ttie project inGudes 3,500 s.f.of administrative space of the Parks Department and numerous public meeting and activify
spaces. All funding wiil go into an investment fund controlled by a community development entity and all funds will be drawn
from that fund asthe project is constructed.
Progress Summary:
ConsVuction documents are complete and ready for bidding, pertnilting and construction.
FuWre Impad on Operating Budget:
The annual operating budget fiscal impac[is estimated to be$200,000.
Budget: zo�t vrDaesual zo�z �7 Buaeee
BuAget E�enAlturea Butlget. Balsnee
Adopted Budget • ' ' '
Budget Amendments
Ad/usted Budget - - - -
Aatfvity: _ ._ _ _
. 2011 YE 2012 Year End
Funtling Sou'ces: Priw b 2011 Estimafe � 2072 Bud et 2013 Butlgat' Pro eet Total
HUD 1081oan' - - - . 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 '
NMfC' - - 5,102,800 - 5,102,800
REET1' � 97,000 1,130 679,100 - 777,230
OMer(TBOJ• . , - - 1.878.700 - 1.878.100
omB.�sa�uwasrer-�s�• �.000,000 - - �,000.000
Proceeds/rom Sele to QALICB - -� 8,000,000 . 8,000,000
OMer(Fund.328)• �
Total FunAing Sourees: 1.097,000 1,730 17,660,000 - 18,758,130
Capltal F�cpendRures: . .
PiopertyACquisitlon - - 8,000,000 - 8,000,000
� � Design _ 1,092.000 1J30 663,000 - 1,756,130
Pro/essionalServices - - � 1,856,900 - 1,856,900
� Conshuctlon(MACCJ 5 000 7140 700 7 1G5 100
Total Expandltures: 7,087,OU0 �1,150 17,680,000 - 78,758,190
Forecasted Project Cost:
- � - ' -- � Total
2074 2D15 .ZO18 2D77 2012-2077
Fundi�g SouRes:
. HUD708Loan• - , -. - - 2,000,000�
Nh17C' ' ' ' ' S.102.800
REET4' - - - - 679,100
Other(TBD)' ' . ' ' ' ' 1.878.100
Proceetls Irom Sale M QALICB 8 000 000�
Total FunEing Sourees: - - . - 17.660.000
Capifal ExpenAkuras: �
PropertyACqulslfion - . - . - 8,000,000
�esl9n ' - - - - 683,000�
- Prolessional Services - - - - 1,856,800
ConshucAlon(MACC) 7,140 100
. Toml E�andld+res: . . ' ' � ' ' 77.660.000
Grarns!Other Sources: 'Revenue sources slrown In 2010I2011 are estlmates-ot all required Nnding. PJI tunCing will go into an Imestrne'rt tund .
comrolled by.a crommunity developmerrt errtity antl all tunds�wili tie drawn from Iha(funtl�as Ne projeet is eonstructed.
167
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL:PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (327) Cap�tal FaetutiesPlan
Six Year Capital Facflities Plan,2012-2017 Capifal ProJects Fund
ProjectTitle: Veteran's Park Improvements
ProjectNo: Cpxxxx ,
Rroject Type: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. Fabe�
Description: -- _
Replace e�dsting concrete paths, add a climbing toy with safety surfacing, upgrade spray pool or e�and playground, improve
irrigation boverage, seledive tree removal and Nrt renovation.
Brogress Summary:
FutureJmpact on Operating Budget
None
� BUdgBt: 2077 YTDAetual 21M2 � � 71 Budget�.
- 9ueget Fxpem+a,res euaget sa�a�e
. AdoPtetl Budgef ' ' ' '
. Budge[AmerMmeMS'
Atljusted Hudgef - - - " -.
ACtiVity:
� ' 20H YE 2012 Year End
� FurMing Soureea: Pr1or to 2077 Esdmate .2012 Bud eL ?A13 Bud eet Total . .
MuniWpelParksConsWCh'on�Fund -� - - �100,000 -�� � _
� . Grants(Fed,State,Loca7J� - - - �� - -
' Bond Proceeds� -� - • - '
REET ' ' ' ' '
Other
� Total Funding Sources: ' • .
, CapMal Expendilurec: -
. Oeslgn � - • - - ' � -
Right ol Wey - - - - �
Cons(ruc0on 100 000 .
�' '� Total Eapendltures: - -� - 100,000 � -
foreeasted Projed Cost:
Totel
2014 2015 2016 2077 . 2012-201L_. '
, . Funding Sources: � . -� � -
. Municipal Parks ConswctionFUnd - - - - 100,000 �
� GreMS(Fed,Stste,Loca!) - - - - �-
� BorM Proceeds ' - ' ' '
REET - - - '
Ofhar
' ToTal Funding Sourees: • . - - - - . �00.000
. Capifal EzPenditures: � .
. . . . . Des19n - - ' - - �
Righto/WaY ' ' ' ' '
Cons6vmon ' -100 000
Total ExperMltures: . - .. . - 700.000
Grants/ONer Sourcas: �
168
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital FaeilitiesPlan
Six Year CapMal FacilRies Flan,2012-20'17 CapMal ProJects Fund
ProjectTitie: Les Gove Park ImprovemeMs
Froject No: CpX)OOc
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. Brewer
Description:
Picnic Shefter at Les Gove Park.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
BudgBt: � � 2077 YTOAetual 20t2 116uAge! .
. . . . ... _. ..
Budget. E:pendku�es 8udget .. Balanee
AdoptedBudget - = - - - - �- ' - -� —_
ButlgetAmendmeMS � � '
Atl/ustetlButlget -� - - -
. ACSIVIS)/: . . .
� � " 2011 YE 2012 Yaar End
FunAing Sources: : Prlor M 2011 Eatimste 2012 Bud et �.2073�Bud et_. Pro aet Total
Munieipel Parks Consbvetion Fund _ _ .. . . . . _ -
Grants(Fed,Stete,Locel) - - 25,000 � - 25,000
BorM Proceeds - - - - -
REET • ' ' '
Other
Total Funding Sourees: - - 25,000� • 25,000
CaPital Expendilures: � � ,
pesiqn - . . � .
RigMO/Wey - - - -
Construetion ' 25 000 ' 25 000
� Total Ezpandlturea: . - 25,000 � • 25,000 �
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2014 • 2075 2076 .2017 2012-2017
Funtling Sourees: � �
� - - Municipel Perks Construction Fund - - • - -
Grants(Fed,State,Locaq - - • - 25,000 -
� Bond Proceeds. �- '� - - -
REET � � _ _ _ _
O(her
� Total Funding Sourcas:' . - - - � - 25,000
Capltal Expendllures:
Des19� - - - - - .
. Rght of Way - � - . - - -
Consm/ctlon � 25 000 �
. romi�an�ra: • -. - . zs,aoo
� GreMS I Other Sources: 4Culture IMetlocal Grent �
169
City ofAuburn Capital Fgcilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) .- oapltal Fac��Kies P�an
Six Year Capital Faotlities Plan,2012-2017 Capital P.rojeets Fund
Projea ritie: Rotary Park Improvemer�ts
Project No: Cp0807
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project.Manager Fabef
Descrlption:
Based on coriipleted Master Plan, coordinate improvements with neighborhood and Rotary Club of Aubum to add;walking
patli.
Progress Summary:
Fuhire Impaet on Operatlng Budget:
None
Budget: 2ott vrnaetuai 2ot2 taeuaget
BuAgat Expendituras .Budget � Balance
- AdoptedBudgef ' � �' ' �'�
8utlget Amentlments � - -
� Adjusted Budget ' • ' � '
/�GtIV�I: .
2071 YE 2012 Year End
' Funtling Sourees: � Prior W 2011 Esdmate 2012 Bud� 2013 Bu . Pro s'et Total_
. � � Municipel Perks ConsWCNon FurM 27,700 - � - 90,000� - �� �--27,700
GieMS�(Fed.Sfate.LOCSI) - - - - -
BorM Proceeds - - - � - -.
REET ' ' - - •
. . � OMer 25000 � 25 000
. Total Funtling Sources: -52.700 • 30�OOD 52,700
CapNalExpendKura:
Design - • - _ _
Rlghto/WaY - ' ' . - '
- ConsWCtlon 52,700 30 000. . _. 52 700. �
. ` Total E�endlNresd 52.700 - .. . �30.000 "- --52.70D� .
Forecastea Project Cost:
Total
2014 2075 2078 2017� 2012-2077
� Funding Sourees: - . . - " -
� Munlclpel Parks Constnia0on Funtl - - - � . �- 30,000 � �
� � Grants(Fed,Stete,locaq - • - - -
BorM Proceeds ' ' ' ' - .
.REET - - ' - -
OMer
Total Funtling Sourees: - . � - . 30,0�0 �� ..
Capifal E�endllurea: .
� � Desi9n - - ' � ' - .
� Rlght W Way - - - - -
� Construcflon 30 000
Total Expeedlttires: • - - - ' - .30,000 _
GreMS'!Other Soi�rtas: Aubum Rotary" - � �
1�0
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL.PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Cap�� Faetiltles e�an
Six Year Capital Faeilitles Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project Tkle: Shaughnessy Park Improvements
Project Na CP�000c
Projea 7ype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager: FabO�
' Description:
Demolftfon of ebsting tenniscourt, replacing with lawn area and new loop traiL
Progress Summary: '
Future Impad on OperaUng Budget: •
Increased mowing and utiliUes-$6,000
BudgBt: . .2011" . YTD Aetual � 2012 11 Budpet
eua0ee �enaiwres sua9e� eeian�
AdoptedBudget -� - - -
8udget AmerMinenfs - -
Adjusfed Budgef , � ' ' ' � '
AC�IVI�I: ' . ' .
� 2011 YE� . � 2012 Year Entl
Funding Sourcas: ' � Pdm to 2017 Estlmate . 2072 Bud . 2013 Bud Pro eet Total
MunlGpelPerks Conshuctlon Fund - � - 75,000� 25,000 15,000
GreMS(Fed,Sfafe,Locel) - - - - '
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' - -
REET _ _ _ _
Other(Other Agency,Perk MlUgatlonj• � �- � -
'Tofal Funding Sourees: - . � - - 15,000 25,000 75,000
Capltal E�endlWres:.
Design ' . ' ' ' '
Righ(oI WaY . _ ' ' ' '
Carstruction_ . , _: � 15,000 25,000 75,000
Total Epiendltures: , • �- - - 15,000 25.000 � 75.000 '
Forecastad Project Cost: � � ' �-
7otel
� 2014 2015 . _ 2076 2017 2012-2017
. FuMing Sourws:.. .. �
Municipal Parks Cons6uctlon Fund - - - - 40,000
GranGS(Fed,State,locall � - _ ' - - -
Bond Proeeetls � - - - - -
. REET _ . - - - -
Other(Other Ageney,PaAc Mltlgatlon)' _ � � - -
' Total Funding Soureesc � • - - - 40,000 �
Capltal E�endltures:
�� � - - - - �- -
Rlght W WaY - . ' - - -
. COnSINCtlon' 40 OOO
Tomi�,andieurec: - - � . • ao.000
Grants/�Other Sources: 'MUCkleshoot Tribe,Mitigation �
171
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
- MUNICIP.AL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Captfal Faciuties P�an
S(z Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 � Capital Projeets Fund
Projea Title: Misc. Parks Improvements
Projec[No: cpJOOa
Project Type: Non-Capacity ,
Projed Manager: Fabe�
Desoription:
Minor�park improvements including shelters, roofs, playgrounds, irrigation and restrooms as denoted in the Parks Master
Plan. _ _.
Progress Summary:
Futurelmpaet on Operating Budget:
None
' BudgBt: 2011 Y.TDActual .2012�. 11 Budget
Budget Expendkures Budgat� . Balanee
Atlopted Budget � - � _ - _ . - '
BudgetAmendmeMs
� Ad/usted Budgei - - - -
ACt1Yfl)i: --� - --
- 2071 YE 2012 Yaar End �
Funding Sourees:� Prior to 20N Estlmate 2012 Butl et. 2073 Bud e! Pro ect ToW
_ Munieipal Perks Construdlon Fund 68,400 - - .. � 66:400
Grents(Fed,State,Local) - - - - --
Bond P�o�eds � ' ' ' _ '
REET - - _ _ _
� - Other(Perk Impact Fee)' - 50 000 700,000� 50.000. . __.150,000
Total Funtling Sourees: � 68,400 50,000 .100,000 . 50,000 � 216,400
Capifal Expandih�res:
Desi9^ - - - - -
Rlght MWay - - - - _
ConshucYion 68 400 50,000 100 000 � 50,000 21 B 400
� Tota�Expendihnes: 68,400 50,000 700,000 50,000 . 218,400
Forecasted Project Cost: - , ,
7Ma1
� 2014 2075 2018 201F . 2012•2017
. . � Funding Sourees: - - - -----
. Municipal Parks ConsbucUon FmM 200.000 - - -. � 2(10,000
GrarMS(Fed,SYate,Local) '100,000 - - - - tU0,000
Bond.Proceeds - - - - _
REET - - - -
Othei(Perk Impact Fee)• - 50 000 200 000
Total Funding Sour�es: 300,000 50,000 � - - • - 500,000
Capital 6cpen d I W res: �
Design • - - - -
Right o/Way - - - - _
ConsWCtion. 300 000 50 000 500 000
Toql ExpenAifures: 300,000 50,000 - - 500,000 �
Granis I Other Sources: 'Parks Impacl Fee Funds �
1�2
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS GONS,TRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Eacllltles Plan
Siz Year Capital Facilitles Plan,2012-2017 Capifal ProJeots Fund
Project Title: CaR1B►O� POPk
Project No: Cp�000c
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projea Manager: Faber
Descrlptlon:
Add landscaping to park as a buffer forhousing and at play structure;and splR reil fencing at play structure. The projed is
identified in the adopted 2005-2010 Parks Improvement Plan.
Progress Summary: ,
Future Impaet on Operating BudgeY. '
None
� BUdg9t: �� . 2077 ' YTD Aetual 2012 77 Budgeb
Budgat ExpendiWres Budget Ba�ance
Adopted Budgef - ' - ' -� - � ._
� . . &Mgef AmendmeMS . . . .
AdjusteCBudget -� - - -
Activit�r:
, 2011 YE� 2012 Year End
Punding Soureee: Prior to 20N • Esthnate 2072 Bud e!- � 2073 Bud et Pro eetTOfal ��
Municipal Perks ConstrucUon Fund - - -, 55,000 -
Grairts(Fed,Sfate.Lwal) ' ' '. ' '
8ond Pmceeds - - - - -
REET . - - � - - -
Other "
Total Fundfng Sources: • • - 55,000 -
CaPital Expentl(tures:.
DBSi9n ' ' ' ' '
RighfolWay . . - - - - -
ConshvUion 55 000
rorai�roe�an„res: - - - ss,000 -
Forecastad Project Cost:
, Total
zo�a zo�s m�s 20�� zo�z•zon
Funding5oureas: . . . . --
Murncipal Perks Construetlon FurM ' • - - - 55.000
Grants(Fetl�Stete�LOCaQ - ' - - ;
•Bond Proceeds - - - - -
� REET - ' - - -
� � Ofher" � .
Total Funding Sources: . - � - - - 55,000
Capkal Fspendkures:.
De� - - - ' '
Right o/Wey . - - - . - -
Conshucfion � � � 55 000 �
' Total Expendkuras: - -- , ' • ' S5,000
G2MS I Otlier Sources:
173
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPALPARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) - Cepital Eaeilities Plan
SUc Year Capftal Facilities Plan,2D72-2017 Cap'Ral Projects Fund
Project Tine: Game Farm Park Improvements
Projed.No: cpbOOC .
Project Type: Non-Gapacity
Project Manager. FabB�
DescNptfon:
Playgroundand Plaza improvements.
Progress Summary:
Fulure lmpaet on Operating Budget:
None
BudgBt:. . � 2011 YTD Actual Y072 11 Budget �
s�agae. ��a+mres e�d�e sa�a�ea
� .. , Adopfed Budgef _ . . _ . ' '
BudgetAmendmaMS �
. . Adjusted Budgef . - - - - - -
Activity:
20N YE .2012 Year End
. � Funding Sourcesd Pdor M 2011 Estimate 2072 Bud e! 2073 BudgM Pro eet Total�
� Municipe!Perks ConstrueUon Fuird � �- � � � - 150,00 80,000 - 150,000
Grsrtfs(Fed,State,localJ� - - ' 20.000 - � 20,000
BorW Proceeds. - - ' - -
�� - - - - -
Ofher
Total Fundinp Sourees: • 170.000 BO,OOO ��t70,000
Capital E�endllures: .
Desi9n - - - - -
. Righto/WaY - - - -
Consnuctlon� 170 000 80000 170000
rorei r�naiw�: - - ��o,000 eo,000 no,000
Foreca;ted Projeet Cost:
TMeI
2074 2015 2078 2017 .2012•Z07Z
� � Funding Soureas: .
. � MunicipelParks Cons6uctlon FurN - - � - . � _ '230.000 �
GrarMS{Fed.Sfate.Locen - ' ' - Z0.000
. BondProceeds. - - - . - -�
REET - - - -
OMer
� Total Funding Soumes: � - �. -. ' - -- _. -" �250,000
, Capifal E�nMih�res: .
Design - - - � - -
RigM o/WaY ' - ' - -
ConstrucNOn 250 Ob0
�TOWI EzpendHures: ' ' ' - 250,000
GraMS I Other Sources:20K'Keboom"gwm Wnding. � ��, .
174
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
, MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) . Cap�ta[Fauut�es P�an
Six Year Capital Faeflkies Plan,2012-2017 Capital ProJects Pund..
Project Tkle: GaineS Pdt1c
Projed No: Cp�ooC7c
ProjeaType: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
DeseripUon: .
Develop Horticufture Plan for the Park as indicated in the 20052010 Parks.lmprovement Plan.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None -
Budget: sott rrDnca,ai 20�� tt eua�
. e�eAee �e�atd,res e�daee sata�
Adoptetl Budget - - - � � _
Budget Amendments � �
Ad/usted Budgef. . ' ' �' ' -
AcUvity:
� � T077 YE � 2012 Year End
. - Funding§wrees:;^ , : - Prlor W 2011 ' EeLimate 2012 Bud et . 2073 Bud e! �Pro aet Total
Munkipal Parks ConsfiicNaiFUntl , � - � � - -- • _ � .9,500 -
Grents(Fed.Sfete.Loeel) - - - - -
BondProcesds� - - - ' -
REEt - - - - -
. Other
Total Funding Sources: - ' '� ' 9,500 ..
Capltal Ezpendkures: � . , �
. peyg� _ _ - 9.500 -
RigMWWay � - - _ _ _
Conawch'on
Total Expenditures: � �- -. .. � 9�500 - .
Porecasted Project Cost:
TMaI
2014 � 2015 2076 2D77 207I-ZIN7
Funding Sourees: . .
Municlpal Parks�Conshuction Fund �-� - - - 9,500
Grents(Fed,Stete,LOCeQ - . _ _ _ _
Bond Proeaeds . - - - - -
REET - ' � - - -
Other
Total Funding Sourms: - - - - 9,500
Capifal Expenditures: �
Design - - ' ' 9�500� �
Righto/Way � - - - _ _ '.
- Construction �. - - � -
ToLal ExperWitures: � ' ' ' ' ' 9.500 .
GrantslOtherSources: - �
1�$
City of Auburn Capita!Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) CaPital Facilities elan
Siz Year CapMal Fae(Iities Plan,2012-2017 Capital ProJeels Fund
project.Title: Rcegner Park
ProjectNo; Gp�000c
Projeot l'ype: Non-Capacity
Projed Manager. Faber
Des'eriptfon:
This project requires trail system maintenance, play structure replacement and riverbank stabilization.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
Buagef: 20„ rivna�i , zoiz _ ,,sud�
euagai ExpendRures e�deas sala�e
. � ' AdoptedBudget - - � - -
� Budget Artrendmerrts - � - - -
� � AdJusfed Budget - - - -
ACtiVH)l:
2011 YE 2012 Year.�
� • Funding Sourees: Prior to 2011 Esllmate 2072 Budget �2073 Budget . Pro eG 7otal .
' Municipal Parks ConsWCtion Fund � . . ._. __ - - ___ ._ .__ -_ ._
. GraMS(Fed.SYate.LOea!) - - ' - ' r
Bond Proeeetls - - - - -
REET ' ' ' ' ' .
Other(Pmp Levy 2) - - - -
7otal Funtling Sourees: - - � - � • � .
� Capifal ExpendiWres: .
Desi9n - - - - -
� RgM ol WaY • - - - � -
� ConsMUUlon
� . Totel Expandituros:� ' ' - � _- - � - .
Foreeasted Project Cost
' Total
2014 2015 2018 � 2U17 2D72-2017
� Funding Sourees:.
, Municipa!Perks Construetion FurM 30,000 - - - . 30,000
G/ants(Fed,State,Local) 30,000 - - - 30,000
Bontl Pmceeda - - - - -
REET ' ' ' ' '
Other(Prop Levy 2) - - - - -
Total Funding Sourees: 60,000 - - - 60.000
Capital ExpendHures: �
, Desi9n - ' - - -
RigMO1WaY - - - - �-
ConsWCtion 60 000 60 000 �
, Total Expandkurea: 60,000 - - 60,000 '
� GraMS/OMer Sources: ' Slate Conservation Grent and Prop.2 fund
176
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND�(321) Cepital Fae'iuties Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilities PIan.2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project Title: Aubumdale Park
Projed No: cp7000c
a�oject rype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Fab2�
Description:
Develop a Master Plan for the Park, insTall an irrigation system, new play structure and imprvve signage.
Progress Summary: .
Future Impact on Opereting Budgei
UdliGes would increase by$5,000 � �
BudgBt: 2011. YTD Aetual 2012 11 Budget .
� � Budget. Expendkurea Butlget Balanee
- Adopted Budget �' ' ' '
� 8utlget AmentlmenGa -
� Ad/ustedBudget ' ' '� ' '
ACtivky: � "
� P011 YE . Y012 Year End
- ,Funding Sourees: � Prlor to 2017 �.EaSimate 2012 Bud 2017 Bud et Pro eet Totai
" Municipel Peiks ConsVUCflon Fund - - - 25,000� � - - � -25;000
� GrenLS(Fed.Stefe.LOeaq - � - -� - -
Bond Pioceeds • - - - -
REET ' ', ' '
ONer(Ot�er AgentyJ' 50 000 50 000 '
. TotafFUndingSoureea: • �• 75,000 � - 75,000
Capltal Expendlturea: '
Design _ . . . _ . _
R;gnr a wey - - - - � _
Conshuction 75 000 75000
Total ExpenAlturea:'" ' . - 75,000_ - 75,000
Foreeasted Projed Cost: _
Topl
2010. � 2075 2018 2077 2D12-2D77.
FunAing Sourees:� � �-- ---- --- - �
Munic'ryal Parks Construdlon Fund - - - - 25,000
, Grents(Fetl.SYete.LOCaq • - . - . - -.
Bond Proteetls ' • ' ' '
R�T ' - ' -
OMer(OMer Agency)' S0 000 �
Tofel FunGieg Sources: � � • -� - 75,000 �
Capihl HcpendHUeea: - .
DesiBn - - - - -
Rghto/YVaY - ' _ - - -
ConsWCtlon 75 000
, Total F�cpenditures: • � - - - 75,000�
Grams�/OMerSources: "Service�duDdonatbn� � -
17�
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND 321
( � Capital Faellities'P.lan
Siz Year Capiql Facilities Plan;2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Projea Titie: Auburndale Park II ,
� � �Project No: Cp�o00C � . - �
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Projec[Manager. Faber
Description:
Develop a Master Plan in 2013; improve the existing trail system and install signage and play structure.
Progress Summary:
Fatuie Impact on OPeratlng BudgeC
Increased utility costs of$2,000
Budget: zo�� rrnnauai m�z �teuage�
e�a� �a�re8 s�de� e��
AdoptedBudget - - - - -- -- — -
Budget AmerMments � �
AdJuslad Butlget - � - . - ..
ACHVU)/:
zo�t re zo�z rear eea
Funding5ourees: PAo�to2011 �EStimate :20128utl et � 2013�Bud et ProectTotal
Municipal PerksLonshuctMn Funtl 10,000 - � � - � - -50,000'�-�"-"�" -10,000
� Grants(Fed,Sfafe,LOeaq � 10,000 - - � 50,000 10,�00
8ontl Proceetls - - - - -
� REET - - � - - -
Other
Totel FunGing Soureea: 20,000 • , � 100,OOU
cavimi E,cpenanures:
��� zo,000 - - - 2o.noo
� RgM oI WeY ' ' - -
. Constructlon - 100,000 �
' Tofel EzpendHurea: 20,000 - � • - 100,000 20,000
Foreeasted Projeet Cost: — — -
Total
2014 2015 �2076 Z017 . 2012-2077 _
Funtling5ources: � . -- -- -- - -
� Municipel Perks ConstrucUon Fund - - - - . 50,000
- Grents(Fed,State.LOCeI) - ' ' ' SO.00U
� - � - Bond Proeeads - _ - . .
R� ' - - - -
Other
� Total Funding Sourees: - - - ��- -- - 100,000
Capltal ExpenAiNres:
� pgsl9n ' ' ' ' '
Right ofWay ' ' ' ' '
ConsWCNOn 100 000
Total�.F�xpenAlWrea: . . - . 100,000
Grants I Other Soureea: King Counry YouM Sports FaGlity Grant - .
1�g
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Cap�tal Faeiitt►es P�an
Six Year Capftal Facilkies Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Projecr7itle: Centennial Viewpoint Park
Project No: Cp70oIX
Project Type: NOn-CapaCity
Project Manager. Fabe�
Descript3on:
De4elop a landscape plan for the park and remove antenna finm building.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operatlng Budget:
None
Budget: tott rrn n�wai zo�z tt sud�
a�aeee E,�enan�re$ sudaet eeia�ee
Adopted.Audget - . - - -
Budget Amentlments - - - - -
� Adjusted.&idget - - . , - - -
AdiVity:
2017 YE � � � 2012 Year End
Funding Sources: .-Prlorto 2011 Fstlmate 2012 Bud et 2073 Bud et Pro eetTotal
Munlelpel Parlcs Construefion FurM ' � - - - - . � -
Granfs(Fed.SYate.locel) ' ._ ' . ' '
BorM Proceeds _ ' ' ' '
REET ' ' _ _
Ofhe�
Total Funding Soumas: - • . , -
Capital ExpemtiWres: ..
DeslB� - - - - -
RIgMO/Wey - - - - -
Consbucfion �
Total ExpendiNres: - - • . • -
Forecasted Projed Cost: . _ -
ToTal
. . �2014 .2015_ _ 2018 2017 2012-201T
Funding Soureea: � - - ' � � - � .
� . Municipal Parks Constructlon Fund � 35,000 - . - - 35,000
Grants(Fed,Sfafe,Locel) - - - - -
Bond Proceeda ' ' ' ' '
.REET _ . ' ' '
Otlrer
" Total FundinA Sourees: � 35,000 -��- �- - . - 35,000
� �Capltal.ExpentllWrea: '
� Deslgn � 7.500 �- - - 7,500
. - RIgM of Way - - - - - ,
ConsWCtlon 27 500 27 500 �
, TohlExpendHmes: .' 35,000 �' . -� 35,00p . �I
� Grants I Otlrer Sources: . . .`.
179
Gity ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)` � Capita�Fae�uues Plan
Six Year Capital Faeilittes Plan,2012-2017 Capital?roJeetsFond
- -.. . _ _ —
Project Title: BPA Trail Lea Hill
Project.No: cp0919
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Feber
Desq►fptlonc- ` - -_
Develop a#easibility/due diligence study to detertnine the extent of issue with treil design and alignments along the BPA
corridor on Lea Hill between 132nd Ave SE and t O8N Ave SE,from Jacobson Tree Farm to the east line of the Aubum GoH
Course. Construct the Trail in subsequent phases.
Progress Summary:
Future lmpact on Operating Budget: '
None
Budgef. m�t rroacn,a� zOtz iteuaget
. ' Budget E:penditures Budget� Balanee . .
_ . _ _ _. .. _ _..
AdoptedBudget - � - � � - . -
Budget Amendmerrts - - - -
Atljusted Butlget - - - .
ACUVIty: � '
� 2017 YE , 2072 Year End
� . ' _ Funding Sourees:. PHor.W 2011 Estlmete 2072 Bud �et 2013 Bud et� Pro eet.Total
Municipal Parks Consfruction Fund - - - � � - -
� . � Grants(Fed.State.LOCeQ ' - - 150.000 -
Bond.Proceeds - - - - -
�T . . . _
Other(KCProp.2)• 45,000 - 150,000 _ .-45000
ToWI Funtling8ources: � 45.OD0 - - � 300,000 _45,000
, CapltafEzpandiNras: ' .
� Design 45.000 - - , - . 45,000
. . . RigM of WaY ' - ' - � -
. . . . Constructlon� 300000 .
� � Totel�Expendituies: 45.000 - - . � .300,000 45,000
. . _ _ ._ . _ _ - . _ —_'_____ _— .— _
Foreeasted Project Cost• - - ---''- _'
7offii
. . � - . . .. . 2014 2015 - .2016 . �2077- — — 2072-201Z--
� Funding Sourees: . . . - . - . .. .. - .
�MUnidpel Parks Construction Fund - - 100,000 � �700,000. � 200,000
, � �� Grents(Fe�d,Stete.Locelj - - -' � - 150,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - - -
- Ofher(KC Prop.2)' 100 000 100 OW �.350,000 _
' Total Funding Soumea: �700,000
Capital Expenditures:
�es8� - - - - -
RightWWay - - - - �
co�scueno� �oo,000 �00000 �oa000 �oa000 i00000
romi��am,�e: +oo.000 �oo.000 +oo.000 - too.000 �oo.000
Grants!Ottier Sources: 'Other is King CouMy Prop.2 funds '
I80
. City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION'FUND (321) � Capita�Faei�ities P�an
Six Year Capital Faeilkies Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Tine: Lakeland Park#4
Projeot No: cpXXXX
° ProJect Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Faber
Description;
I DevelopmeM and construction of an environmental community park. Trails;fencing, parking and visitor amenities are
included in the project.
Progress Summary: _
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
Increased mairrtenance costs of$5,000
� Budget: zott rrna�ai zo�� ��suaaes
. . � Budget _ .Ezpendkurea Budga! Balanee
Adopted BudBet � .. - - � -
� Budget i7mendments
Atl/usted Budget - - - - �
Activity:
� � , 2011 YE 2012 Year End
� � Funding Sources: PHor to 2011 .Estlmate -2072 Budget �2013 Budget ProJeet Rotai
Municipal Parks CorrsbvcPion Fund � • - -
� Grartta(Fer/,Sfate.Loeall - - - - -
Bond Proteeds . ' ' ' ' '
REET � - - - � - -
Ofher
.. Total FuMing Sourees: - - • • -
Capihl E�anAltwes:.
Desi9n - - - - -
Right oI WeY - ' ' ' '
Consfructlon
. . Totel F�pendltures: '� - ' ' '
Forecasted Project Cost:
7otal
2014 2015 ..2016 �2017 2012•2017
. � " FundingSoureas: . . . .- --- . .
, Munlcipal Parks Construc8on Funtl 150,000 150,000 - � - 300,000
Grants(Fed,SYete,LocalJ 150.000 t50,000 - - 300,000
Bontl Proceeds ' ' ' ' '
REET ' ' ' ' ' '
OMrer
. Total Funtling Soureas: 300,000 300,000 - - 600:000
Capifal ExpenAlturea:.
Design 30.000 - � - - �90,000
Right o/Way - - - - � -
� Construetlon � 270 000 300 000 570 000� � '
Totnl F�amlltures: � � �300,000 300.000 - • 600,000
� � Grants I Other Sources: . �
�gi �
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capltal Faeilities Plan
Six Year Capital FaeilRies Plan,2012-20tt •Capital Projects FurM
ProjectTide: Williams Pipeline Trail
Project No: cpXXXX
Projea Type: Non-Capacity . -
Project Manager. Faber ,
Deseriptlon. ,
Develop a design,for a multi purpose treil over the Williams pipeline right-of-way,and construct the trail from BridgeYAvenue
SE to the White River Trail in the southeast part of the City.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget: '
None
Budget: zo�� rrunea,ai sotz tt suagee
Budge! Expendittirea Budgat� Balanee
Adopted 8udget - - . - � -
Budget Amendments
AdJustedBudget - - - - - --
Activity:
zo�rre zo�z vear�a
_ FundingSourcea: Priwto�2077� Estimate 2072Bud 2013Bud et Pm'edTOtal
MuniWpel Parks Consbuctlon Fund. - � - -
� Grants(Fed.SYate;local) - - - - -
- Bond Proceeds - - - - -
REET - - - -
OMer -
Totel Funding Sourees: . . . . .. - -' .
Ceplfal E.q�anditures: .
Desi9n ' ' ' ' '
Right o/Way � - - • ' - -
CarshucNOn
Total Expanditurea: ' ' " ' . . _ -. .- � . .
Forecasted Projeet Cost: •
Total
, . . 2074 2015 ZO16 ,2077 .Z012•2017
Funding Sources: � -- �� �- �� .
Municipal Pe1ks Constrilctlon Fund. - - 100,000 � 't00A00 200,000
Grents.(Fed,SYate,Locaq - - �100,000 100,000 �200,000
Bond Proceeds - - - - - -
REET - - • ' � -
OMer
� Total Funding Soureee: - - Z00.000 �200,000 � 400.000
CapMal Eryendituras: .
� Design - - � 25,000 - 25,000
Righto/Way� . - - - - -
' � ConsWCtion 175000. 200�000 �375000 .
TofalExpendkurea: - • 200,000 . 200,000� 400,000
Gwrna/Other Sources: - � .
1g2
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) capital Faei�ities P�an
Six Year Capital Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 CapMal Projeets:Eunil
Projea rnie: Lea Hill Park Replaeement
Rroject No: cp1003
Project Type: Parks
Project Manager. Daryl Faber
Deserlptfon:
In coordination wRh the Community and Green River Community College,design and construct a new community park to meet the
needs of the Lea HIII Community. �This park will replace the existing Lea�HiII:Park. .
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on OperaUng Budget:
Inaeased mowing and utiliUes$6,000 -
BUdgBt: . � 20N YTDAetual . �2012 17 Budpet
. � BuEget Expentlttures Budget Balanee
Adopted Budget - _ _ .
Budget Ameridments -
Adjusted Budget - - - - �
Aetivity:.
' 2077 YE � � 2012 Year End
Fwding Sourees:� � Prior to 2011 Estlmata 2012 8 at . � 2073 Butl e! Pm Tofel
Municipal Parks Conshiii7ion Funtl � - � - - � - -
.. Giants(Fetl.Slefe.LOeeQ - ' ' ' '
Bond Proceeds - - - - ' -
REET - - - .
Other(GRCC Reimb) � 200'-000 1,300,000 ' 1 500 000
Total Funding Soursea: � � - 200,000 1,300,000 � - 1,500,000
Capita�ExpentliWres:
Deslgn - 200,000 - - 200,000
Righto/Wey - - - - -
Constructlon � . 1 300 000 7 300 000
TotalExperMlWrea: .. • �Z00;000 1,3U0,000 - 7,500,000�
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
.2014 � 2p75 2076 2077 2012-2017
� Funding Soureea: .
Municipa/Pailrs ConsvuUlon Fund - - - . - -
Grents(Fed,State,Locep - - _ _ _
Bond Proceeds ' ' ' '
REET � - - - - -
Other(GRCC RelmD) 1 300 000
Totel Funding Soureea: . � - - - - 1,300,000
Capifal Expendilures: .
� Desl9n - - - - '
. ' � RIgM ol WaY ' � - - . ' '
Conshuction 1 300 000 �
.. . � �� Total Ezpentliturea: � : , ' ' , _ .' � ' 1��30U�000
Grants I Other Sources: Green River Communily Coilega MOU�
183
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
- -- _
MUNICIPAL PARKS GONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2012-2017 • CapMal Projects Fund
eroject Tale: Fenster Levee Setback; Phase 26
Project No: cpi d16 ..
Projea Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Mdeise�
Descriptlon:
� Project to construct approximately 880 feet of levee setback along the lett bank of the Green'River at the City's Fenster�Nature Park
property..This project is intended to improve fish habttat and create additional Flood storaga�capacity. � '
Progrgss Summary: _
A preli'mfnary design has been completed for the projec[.The City has received grants from the Washinton Sfate Salmon
Recovery Funding Board and the King Conservation Oistrid to complete design and consVUCtion the project Fnal design is
scheduled to complete in 2012,and construdion is scheduled to occur in 20'12-2013.
Future Impad on Operating Budget: '
None
6uaget: zo„ vrn a�wai 20,2 „eue9ee
� Budget ExpendlNrea Budget �Balanee .
Adopted Budget � - -
Butlpet Amernlmenfs ' ' - - -
Ad/uste0 Budgef - - _ _
ActlVlty:
2077 YE 2072 Year End
� � Fundfng Sourwa: Prior to 2011 Estlmate " 2012 Bud Z013 Bud t Pro ed Total
� Municipal Parks Cons6uction FurM . - - - ' '�
Grents(Fed,State,LOeal) 800 99,200 497,500 � � , 12,600 �591;500
Reet - - - -
. CumulaNveReservePuntl - - - � . . -�
. Other(Slorm) - 800 26 B00 -' 7 400- � 27 800
Total Funding Sources: 800 100,000 �518,300 20,000 - - -�878,100
CapMel E:pe�iwres:
Design 800 100,000 - - 100:BU0
� Right o/Wey - - - - �-�
ConsWCtlon 518300 20000 518300�
� Tofal E�endih�res: B00 100,000 518,300 • , � Z0,000 619,100
Foreeasted Project Cost:
Total
� 2014 .2015 2076 2U77 �. _.2012-2017_
Funding Sourees: . . _" .- ... _
Munidpal Perks ConsWCfion FurM - - �- - -
GraMS(Fed.State,LOCaq - - - - 504.100
Other(Storml - - - 34 00.
Totel Funding Soureea: - - • . �• 538,300
' . . . Capltal.Expenditurea: ..
Des18^ ' - - - -
Right ol Wey - - - - -
Canstrvetlon 538 300
Total Expendkurea: ' ' ' . - 558�300
GranLS/Other Sources:Salmon�Reeovery Funding Board Grent($304,103);PSAR($700,000);King Canservation�District($200,000)
184
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE PR-3
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
PARKS and RECREATION, Including MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION
Pro eet: 2013__ 2014 2015 2016 2017 2078 Total.
1 PaAcACqulslfions $ . , .- $ - - $ - $ - $ . - $ - $�. : , _
2 /ssae Evans Park 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 36,000
3 Jacobsen Tree Farm - - - - - - -
4 FulmerParklmprovements - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000
5 AubumCommoniryCenter 200,000�� 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
6 ' Veteran's Park Improv. �- � - - - - - � -
�7 Rotary Park Improv. - - - - � - - - ' -
8 INISt Park Improvements - - ' - - -
9 Cameron Park - - - - - - - -
.10 Game Farm Park - - - - -. - -
A 7 Caaines PaAc - - - - - -
12 RoegnerPark - - - - - -
'13' Aubumdale Park 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000
. 14: Airbumdale Park!( 2,000 2,000 2,000 2.000 2,000 2,000 12;000
15� CenMnn(a/l/lewpofMPark - . - - - - - -
16 BPA Trafl Lea Hfll - - - - - - -
17 Lalceland Park lk - . - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 75,000
_ _
18� �YWIIIams Plpellrre Trel! - - - - ., - -
19 Lea Hlll ParK Replacement 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,OD0 6,000 6,000 36,000
- Total S 219,000 S 224.000 E 224.000 E 229.000 E 229.000 E 229,000 S 1,354,000
185
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
COMMUNITY/ACTIVITY CENTER .
Curtent Facilities
The City of Aubum currently does not have a Community/Adivity Center. •
Level of Service (LOS)
The City does not have a current LOS for a Community/Activity Center..The proposed LOS pf '
3Z2.14 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2017 '
projected citywide population of 75,242. • �
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing .
The proposed Gommunity Center facility construction project is a 6-year pianning expectation
total of$17,660,000>
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
As Table PR—3 shows, operating budget impacts of$1,200,000 are forecasted for the Activity -
and Community Center facili4ies during the six years 2013—2018.
TABLE PR�
Facilities lnventory
Community/Activity Center
CAPACITY
FACILITY _, _ (Square Feet) LOCATION
Existing Inyentory:
cfivity Center 8,000 .
Tota/F�cistMg/nventory 8,000
Proposed Capacity Projects:
Community Centec 20,000
Tota/Proposed Capacity Projects 20,000
2017Pro ected InveMo Total 28,000
186
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
SENIOR CENTER
Current Facilities
The City of Aubum curcenUy has one Senior Center. Table PR-5 Facilities Inventory lists the
_ . ..
facility along with its current capacity and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS of 179.54 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory
divided by the 2011 citywide population of 70,180. The qroposed LOS of 167:46 square feet
per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2017 projected citywide
population of 75,242.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The CFP includes one senior center- capital facilities project for an eme�gency generator.
Detailed project information is located under the General Municipal Buildings section.
Impact on Future Ope'rating Budgets �
Tfiere are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the senior center facility during the six
years 2013-2018. �
TABLE PR-S
Facilities Inventory
Senior Center
CAPACITY - -
FACILITY (Square Feef) LOCATION
Existing Mventory:
Senior Cerner 12,600. 808 9th Street SE
Total ExisGng/nventory 12,600
Proposed Capacity Projects:
None -
Tota/Proposed Capaclry Projects -
_ - 2077 Pro'ected lnvento Total 12,800
18'7
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
�
� ''"��s-�'"'�r:-�,,. ...-�
� ';s _�„ �
CITY OF �4� ,�.,�.-������,,,,w �
�
� _
�- �. . .
, �.. .� �....
� �
�,';;. -�''=—' °— .�.,�_� _
��.-- �..--.� m-�:
,r F,,,! �.. � — �
.,v�.�..- ;d,- �
* � r�
�:;,. �wr .�,,.
� m.�� :�
�,;�s <�r���,�;.�--
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEIJ
�88
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
GENERAL'MUNICIPA� BUILDINGS
Current Facillties �
The current inventory of City govemmerrt administration and operations facilities, include
155;975 square feet for general gov@mment operations, 62,188 square feet for police services,
and 31,653 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 249,816 square feet. Table GM —,1
"Facilities Inventory' lists the facilities elong with their current capacity and loqtion.
Level of Seryice (LOS) -
The current LOS of3,559.65square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory
divided by the 2011 citywide population of 70,180. The proposed LOS of 3,586.07 §quare feet
per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2017 projected citywide
population of 75,242. _
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The City's General Municipal Building facilities include four capital projects at a cost of
$1;766,500 and debt service at a cost of $3,581,900 for a total of $5,348,4U0. The projects
include (1) $140,000 for M8Q Vehicle Bay and Storage 6uilding, (2) $500,000 for Equipment .
Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay (3) $626,500 for HVAC Upgrades at City Hall, $500,000 City
Hail Remodel, Phase 7 and $3,581,900 for Gity Hall Annex debt service costs. Table GM — 2
shows the proposed financing plan foilowed by individual worlcsheets showing the projed detail.
Impact on Future.Operating Budgets
Operating budget impacts annually are.not yet forecast for general municipal buildings during
the six years 2013—2018.
189
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE GM-1
Facilities Inverrtory
General Municipal Buildings
• CAPACITY
FACILITY Square Feet _ LOCATION _ ":
EzisSng:lnVentory:
Genera/Govemment:
City Hall 37,700 25 W Main Street
Gity Hall Annex 58,000 1 1N Main Street
City Maintenance & OperaGons Facilrty 25,855 1305 C_Street SW
Parks & Recreafion Admin. Faciliry 7,000 910 9th Street SE
ctivity Center 8,000
Street Waste Handling Facility 2;750 1305 C Street SW
MunicipafCourt(Jusfice Center) 12,200 340 EMain Street
GSA Building � 4,470 2905 C Street#81�5
Tota/ 155,975
Police: �
Headquarters (Jus6ce Center) 24,800 340 E Main Street
Supermallsubsfafion 1,208 1101 Superinal6Way
Bicyc/e storage 300 15'N Division Sfreet
Gun range 32,880 1600 Bbck 16th St NW
Seized vehicle parking sta/!s 3,000 � C Street SW (GSA)
Tota/ 62,188 �
Eire:
Stations: "
' North Station#31 12,220 1101, D Street NE
South Station#32 5,200 1951 R Street SE
GSA SYaGon #33 9,533 2815 C Street SW
Otherfacilities.
Norih Station Maint. Facility 4,700 1101 D SVeet NE
Tota/ 31,653
Total Existing Inventory 249,816
Proposed Capacify Projects.
Community/Activity Cenfec 20,000
Tota/Proposed Capacity Projects 20,000
2017 Pro'ected Invento Total 269,816
190
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE GM-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Caoacitv Profeets:
1 M&O Vehfcle MaiMenance Bay
Capital Costs 100,000 40,000 - - - - 140,000
Funding Sources:
Equip.Rentaf Fund 100,000 ' 40,000 - - - - 140,000
2 62R Vehiele Bay 8 Storage .
Capital Costs 250,000 250,000 - - - - 500,000
Funding Sources:
Equip. Rental Fund 250,000 250,000 - - - - 500,000
SubtotaL Goacitv Proieets:
Capital Costs 350,000 290,000 - - - - 640,000
Non-CapaeiN Proiects:
3 qty Hall HVAC System Upgrade
Capital Costs 626,500 - - - - - 626,500
Funding Sources: .
Capital lmprov. Fund - - - _ _ _ _.
REET 1 626.500 - - - - - 626,500
4 pty Hall Remodel,Phase 1
Capital Costs 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 '
Funding Sources:
CapiTal Improv.Fund 500,000 - - - - - 500,U00
REET 1 � - - - - - - -
5 Clty Hali Mnex
Capital Costa 644,800 645,200 645,200 551,000 548,800 546,900 3,587,900
Funding Sources:
Capital Improv. Fund - - - - - -
GranTs - - - - - -
REET1 644,800 645,200 645,200 �551,000 548,800 546,900 3,581,900
Subtotal.Non-Capackv Profects:
CapiEalCosts 1,771,300 645,200 645,200 551,000 . 548,800 546,900 4,708,400
SUMMARY: .
CAPITAL COSTS
CapaciryProjects 350,000 290,000 - - - - 640,000
Non-CapacityProjeds 1,126,500 - - - - - 7,126,500
Long-Term Debt 644,800 645,200 645,200 551,000 548,800 546,900 3,581,900
Total Costs 2,121,300 935,200 645;200 - .551,000 . 548,800 546,900 5,348,400 -
RINDING SOURCE5:
Equip.Rental Fund 350,000 290,000 - - - - 640,000
Capihal Improv.Fund 500,000 - - - - - 500,000
REET 1 1,271,300 645;200 645200 551,000 548,800 546,900 4,208,400.
Olher - - - - -
Total Funding 2,121,300 935,200 645,200 551,000 548,800 546,900 5,348,400
191
City of Aubuzn Capital Facilities Plan
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) CapitalFacilides Plan
Six Year Capita►Faailities Plan,2012-2017 EMerpriseFunds
Project ritie: Maintenance and Operations Vehicle Bay and Storage
ProjectNa cp0777
Projed Type:.
Project Manager
Description: ' _
Add ttiree insulated dehicle bays for Vador storage to pmvide year-round protection.These vehicles hold large quantitlea of water on
board at all times enabling.them to.be immediately dispatched in the event of an emergenq.This�requiras them to be protected from
freezing temperatures.Draining thair larga tanks each day would cause a dispatch delay while refiliing,that could resutt in extraordinary
damag8 to�public andpriJate property in an emergency sttuation. Enclose existing bays toprovide neoessary weather protection for
�. street sweepers,sanding,and snow plow equlpment. Construct storege shed to fadlitate removal of�portable containers, improving
space uUlization and traffic flow thoughout M80. �
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating Budget: . '
None
Budget: 20�+ rrunceuai zoiz t�eua�:
� Budget E�enditures Budget� � �Balanee
AdoPtedBudget . . ._ .____ ___ __-
BudgetAmendmeMs
Ad%usted Budget - - - -
ActlVity:
(Prevlous 2 vrs) 2017 YE 2012 Year End
Funding Sourees: PNor to 2071 Estlmate 2012 Bud 2013 Butl - ...P eet Total_.
-� UnresMUedEquip.RentalRevenue - 60,000 . - � �100,000 � 40,000- � " 160,000
GraMS(Fed,Stete,Local) - - - -
Other
� - Total FuMinp Sourees: - 80,000 100,000 40,000'- �� -" -160,000
Capifal FspendlWres: .
Des� ' ' _ ' '
Righto/Way - - ' -
COn3tNGtlon 60,000 7OO OOO. 4O OOO- � 16O OOO.
� Toml Expandkures: - 80,000 700,000 40,000 160,000
Foreeasbed Projed Cost: - - —
. . . � -� - 7otel
2014 2015 2076 2017 . .2012-2077_ .
- Funding Sourees: - -- - - -� � � -
UnresMctedEquip.,RentelRevenue� - - - -, . � 740,000
. Grants(Fed,SYete.Locall - - - - -
Olher
- Total FurMing Sources: - . � � .. - � - 140,000
Capltal ExpendHuies: . .
�� - - - . -
RigM ol WaY - ' - . - '
Construetion � 140 000
, Tofal Ezpendkures: , - - - � •� _ �� 140,000
Grents/Other�Sourees: --
192
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) Capita�Faeillties Plan
Siz Year Capibl Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project Tine: Equipmer�t Rental Vehicle Mairrtenance Bay
Project No: cp0710
Project Type:
ProJec[Manager.
Descrfption:
Add�additional vehicle bay at EquipmeM Rental shop for heavy equipment and�large vehicles�to improve efficiency and rertwve�choke
poiMS. Adding a large vehide bay with a maintenance pit will enable us to perform inspections and maintenance on more than one
large vahicle at a-tima,�and.while loaded with product, ie..sand,watar;debris,�sewage..CurreMty several.hours of work have to be �
undone and then repeated dua to our limitations.Not only is�this counterprodudive, but it can ba catastrophic during�cdtical oparations:
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
BUdgBt: 20H YTDAetual .2072 N�.Budgef
� . �eudget Ecpenaia,res swtgel . 6ale�ee�
Adopfed Budget - -
Budget Amendmerrts -
Adjusted Budget - � - - -
ActlVity:
(Piavious 2 Vrs) 2011 YE 2012 Year End
FundingSources� � . Prlorto2077 Esdmate .2012Bud � 20736utl et Proe�t7otal
Unrestdcted Equip.Reritel Revenue � - - - � 250.000 250;000 250.000
Grents(Fed,Sfete,LOCaQ - - - � - -
OMer
iotal FurMinp Sourees: - . 250,000 250A00 250,OOa
Capifel Expendkures:
Design - - . 25,000 - 25.000
Right o/Way - - • - -
Construction 225 000 250 000 225 000
� Total Expendkures: - • 250,000 250.000 250,000
� Forecasted ProJed Cost: . _ ;
.. . . � � ' Total
� 2074 2015 �2016 2017 2012•2017
Funding Swrees: � . � -
Umesfricfed Equip:Rental Revenue - � - - - - 500,000
Grants(Fed,Stete,Local) . - ' - - -
Other
� ToSal Funding Sources: •� - - • 500,000
CapNal ExpendiNres: � .' ' .
Design � - - - - 25,000
Rlghto/Way - - - - --
� Constmction � 475 000
� Total Fxpendkures: - - - . W0.000
. .:Granfs/OMer Sources: - � . .
193
Ciry ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL- IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capita�Fad�wes P�an
Six Year Capital Faeilkies PIan;1012-2017 Capital ProJeets Fund
_ - _ - -
ProjecfTaie: . City Hall HVAC System Upgrade
Project No:, cp0776 ..
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. ToRes
Deseription;
Design and'implemeMation of upgrades to the City Hall heating,ventilating,.and air-conditioning(HVAC)system.. Improvements will �
, allow foc upgrades to ttie wntrols,air distribution anii air handling components. It will also proJide a systematic,pAased implertienjation
plan that pn��be put in place over the neM severel years. , � -
Progress Surtimary:
Future Impaa!on Opereting Budget: �
None
Budget: 20�� rrnnawai xot2 11 Budge�
Budget _ F�cpendituras Budget .Balanee
Adopted Budgef - � - - -
BiMget Amendme/rts
AdjustedBudget - - - - -
Aetfvity:
. . 2011 YE 2012 Yem E'M
� � Funding Sources: Prior to 2011 Estimate 2012 Bud et � 2073�Bud et Pro G Total
. UnrestNded Cap.Impmv.Revenue - - � - - -
GlarKS(Fed,Stefe,local) - - - ' � � - -
REETI 73,700 - 626,500 - � 700,200
ONer
' Totai Funding Sourees: 73,700 - 626.500 �- � �700,200
Capital Expenditures: � .
DBSi9n ' _ ' ' . '.
. Rlght of WaY ' - - - -
� Conshuctlon 73 700 826 500 700 200
. Total ExpandiN1ea: 73,700 - 626,500. . . • �:700,200 ,
_ __ _ _ _ __ ._
. __ _ ._ _ _ _.
Foreeasted Project Cost: - ' - --
.. � . � . . _ . ' � TaRai
2014 2075 2016 '2077 - 2012,2017.
. Funding Sources: - ".- . -�- �-- --�
UnresMcfed Cap.Improv.Revenue - - - � � - . -
� . Grants(FedSYete,Locaq - ' - ' .
REETI -� - - - 828,500
Other
� Total Funding Souroes:� - -� - • � • 626,500
� Capital Facpenditures: �
, � . Design ' ' - ' ;
Right ol WaY ' • - - . '
CorrsWction .. 626500. �
Total Expendituros: ' ' ' ' - 626.500
Grants/Other Sources: .
194
City ofAuburn Capital.Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capita►Eacmties P�an
Six Year Cap(tal Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital ProjedsFurM
aroject Tale: City Hall Remodel, Phase 1
Projed No: Cpl000c ..
Project Type: NOO-CapaClty
Project Manager:
Descriptfon:
� City Hall Remodel-Phase 1 . -
Progress Summary:
' Future Impact on Operating Budget
None
Budget 20�� vro,ac�uai zo�z ��eueeai
e�a� ��em,�. a�a�c eai�,� :
Adopfed Budget �- -_ - - _ - - - _.
Budget AmerMmerrts � .
� Adjusfed Budget ' ' ' - .
Aetivity:
zo++re zo�z r�r�,a
, -. Funding Sourees: PNor to 2077 Estlrtiate 2012 Bud at. _ 2013 BuA et eet Total
' , . �Unresfneted Cap.Improv.Revanue - - 500,000�� � - 500,000
� Giams(Fed,S[ete,Locaq - - - - - -
. . � REEF� - - - - -
Other
'Tofal Funding Soureas: - . 500,000 - 500,000
Capital ExpendRures: �
� . Desi9^ - - - - -
. . - WglrtolWey . ' - ' . - -.
� � � - "- � � Constnietlon 500 000 500 000
� � �ToTal Expenditures: - • 500,000 • ��0,000
Forecasted ProJeet Cost:
Total
. . . � ' .2014 � 2015 2016 7077 2012-2017
Fund'mg Sources: '
Unres�ricted Cep.lmprov.Revenue . ' - • - - 500,000
Gr&MS(Fed,Stete,localJ � - � - �- - - -
. . .(tEET� . ' � ' ' ' . .
Other -
Total Funding Sourees: � - ��- - . - SOO,U00
Capital Ezpendilures: � .
. .Design . � - - • - - .
. Right W WeY ' ' ' ' '
Cons6uction - 500000
rmei�pnur�: _ : _ . _ - soo.000
Grants/Other�Sources: - � . .
195
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Cepttal FacilRCes P�an
Six Year Capkaf Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project Title: City Hali AnneX
Project No:
Project Type:
Project Manager:
Desarlption: � - -
To�pay debt service costs on GO bonds issued.for the City Hall Annex 2012-2017.. �
Progress Summary:
Futurelmpaet on Operating Budgetr '
Budget: zott vrDnowal 2ou ti�Butl�
,., Budget Ezpenditures . Budget Balanea
Adoptetl Budget - ' ' ' -
� Budget Amendments - � - -
� Adjusted 8udget - - - -
ACtfvily:
� � 2011YE 2012Year_E'M �
, Funding Sour�es: Priw W TA77 Estimffie 2012 Bu ef � Z073 Bu et . Pro eet Tofal
- Unrestdctetl Cep Improve _ - _ . _ ..- - . -� . -
GraMS - - � - �-
REET 1 710 800 644 600 644 B00 645 200 ��2 000 00
. Total Fundinp Sources: ' 770.800 644,800 �814,BOD �845,200 .2,000,200
Capital Expendkures: � .
� . ��s9� - - • . - -
Consfi�Minn - - - - -
. , Long-Tertn De6t Service 710 800 644 600 644 800' 645 200 � 2 000 00�
Toml E�endkures: 7t0,800 644,600 844,800 &15,200 2,000,200 �
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Total
� 2074 2075 . 2016 2017 3012,2017
. Fundinp Sourees: -
- UnresbictedCaP�mProve - - - �-
� Grants - - � -- � -
' REET 1 645,200 551 000 548 800 - .�548 9U0�---- -�.3 581 900� .
' . � TMaI Funding Sourcea: 645,200 551.000 548,BU0 - -i48,900--.--- -...8,581,90D �
. ., Capifal Expenditures: '
� ��9� ' - -� - -
. .. Cons6uctlon ' - - -
� � Long-Tem�Debt Service 645 200 551 000 546 800 - �546 900�-----.3 SBt 900
� , TotalEqienditures: 645,200 557,000 i48.800 - 546.900.- - �--�3,381,900.
� Granls/OtAer Sources: �
196
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan •
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS '
Current Facilities
In'2002, the City entered into a 99-year lease with the CenVal Puget Sound Regional Transit
Authority (Sound "fransit) for the use of 180 parking stalls and 4he right 4o sublease 4he
Commercial TenaM area of the transit center parking garage and �etail area.
Level of Service (LOS)
. No Level of Service for community improvement projects have been identified at this time.
Capitaf Facilities Projects and Financing
The Cit�s proposed Community Improvements include fourteen capital projects at a cost of
$7,447,800. Table CI-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets
showing the project detaiL
impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operaUng budget impacts forecast for community improvement projeds annually
during the six years 2013—2018.
197
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan .
TABLE CI-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PCAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
zotz 2o�s 2D14 2D15 2076 2D77 Total ,_
CacaGNProlects: � -- � - - �- .- - �----- -._..---�.
None � . � ' . ' - .
' Non�CauselN Proieets: � .
1 �-Downtown Promenatle ImprovemeMS . �
� Capital Cosis 145,000 - - - - - � 745,000
� Fundirq Souroes: � - . � . . ...�
. Capital��lmp�ov.Fund - - - - - -� � .
� Grarrts(EDA) 55,'100 - - �- - . -� , � �55,100
� Othec(GOBonds) 89,900 �- � � � �89.800
.2 Cl�wide WayfliWing Slgnaga� � . .
Capital Co'sts' � � 61.000 - - - - � -� 61.000
_ FurMing Sources: . �
� . Capltal Impro4.Fund - - - � - - ' - � - �
. Grants ' 61,000 - - - - � . - 61,000�
� ONer(GO Bonds) � .
3 DowntownPedastrlan�LigMing . ,
Capifal Costs� � 39,500 - - - - � � - 39,500
Funding Sources: � ' ' .
Capifaflmpmv.Fund - - ' ' ' ' ' '
GraMs ' - - - _ . _ ..
Other(GO Bontls) 39,500 39,500
�4 Downtown Sculpture Garden - ,
Capifal Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000
FuMing Sources:
CapitalJmpmv.Fund - - - - - - -
' GraMa - - - - ' - -�
Other(GO Bonds) 10.000 70,000 �
.5 NW CIIy,HaUPtara MP�ement
Capital Costs 388,000 - - - - �- 3H8,000
� Furiding Scurces:
Capitallmpiov.��FUnd 382.000 - - - - - 362,000
GraMe - - - ' - -
Ott�er(GO Bontls) 6.000 6,000
. 6 Downtown Fumtture ,
. Cepital Costs . 25,000 - - - - -. 25,000�
' . Fundinp Sourcea: � '
. Capital Impro6.Fund - - - - - - �
Granis ' _ ' ' ' ' .
oine.ico eo�as� Zs,000 zs,000
7�� Annua131Cewalklmprovements .
. - Capital Co3ts � � 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 800,000
Funding.Sources: � .
' Capiml Improv.Fund 20,000 180,000 20,000 180,000 . 20,000 180,000 600,000 �
Grants(Fed,Siate,LOCaI) - - - � - , - - -
REET 2
8 Traftie Calming 6nproveme� '
ca�mi cogc� zoo.000 zoo,000 zoo,000 zoo,000 zoo,000 zoo,000 �,zoo,000
Funding Souroes: '
� Capifel Improv.Fund - - - - - . _ - �
Grants(FedShate.Loeaq - ' - - - - ' .
REET2 ' ' ' ' ' ._ � ._ .
� Other(Redflex) 20D.000 200.000 200,000 20D,000 200,000 20D,000 - ��,Z00,000
198
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE CI-2(continued)
20�2 2013 2014 2075 2018 2077 Ta7al
NonCaoaclN Proiaets: . .
9 7reRle Signel lmpro�reme'Rs
Capital Cosb 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 �
Funding Souraes: '
Capitel Improv.Fund - � - - - - � - _ �
Granffi(Fed;State,LOCep - � �- -� - - . _ _ �
� REET�2 '175.000 _ �175,000 - 175,OOD '175,OOD 175,000' � '175,000 �,oso,000
�0 DowritowoRevlfa�tkn .
Capital Costs - 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,500,000
Funding Sources: ' ` �
Capi�I�Improv.Pund - - � - _ _ _ .
General Fund - 500,000 500,000� 500,000 500.000 500,000 2500,000 �
11 Mohawks Plasties Site Mkigatbn Pryeet �
Cepital Cosls 25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000 -
Funding Sources: � '
General Fund - - - _ _ _ _
OCier(Tralficlmpact) 25,000 20,000 25,000 20,000� 25,000 65,000 180,000
REET2 - - - - - .
12 Loeal I�vkalisalion
Long-Tertn�Debt 214,300_ 213,300 217,100 136,500 135.100 133,000 1,049,300
Funding Sources:
Capifal Improv.Fund - - - - _ .
Grenfs � ' - - - - - .• �
REET2 2'14,300 2'13.300 217,100 136,500 '135,100 133.000 1,049,30D _
13 Ptibfie Mt - � . � .
CapitalCosis 30,000�, �30,000 30,000 30,OD0 30,000 30,000 760,000 . -
Funding Sources: .
�Capitallmprov.Fund 30,000 30.000 30,000 30,000 30.000 30.000 �80,000
Cxanfs(Fed,Ste4e.Loeel) ' - ' - - - •. ,
Otlier - - -
�14 dIN Creek Itestrn'alion. . . ' - � � � �
Cepi�fCosb 10.00Q 10,OD0 - - - - 20,000
Funding Sourcas:
General Fund 10,000 10,000 - - - , - 20,000
GraMS(Fed,Smte,Local) - - - � � _ _ _
Other - - - �- - -
SuMotal.Non�Caoacilv Proieets:.
� �CapltalCosffi 7,342,800 1,328,500 1,167,�00 7,241,500 1,085A00 1,283,000 7,447,800
:SUAAb1ARY: . .
G4PRAL(�OSTS
CapacilyProjec6 - - - - - - - -
Non-CapaciryProjecls �1,128,500 1,115.000 950,000 1,105,OU0 950,000 1,150,000 6,398,500
Long-Tertn Debt 2'16,300 ,2131300 �217,'100 136,500 135,100 �133,000 1,049,300
� Tofal Costs 7,342,800 1,328,300 �,767,100 1y11,500 1,085,100 � 1;285,000 7,447,800 , "
R11mINGSOURCES: �
Capifal improv.Fund 032.000 . �210,000 50,000 210,000 50,000 210,000 1,162,000
GaneralFund 10,000 �510,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,520,000
.. Grants(FeE,State.Local) 118,100 � � - - - � - � - 116;100 -
REET2 .389,300 .388,300 392,'100 311,500 . 310,100 308,000 2,099,3U0
� Olher(fraffielmpaG) 25,000 20,000 25,D00 20,000 25,000 65,000 180,000
Olher(GOBonds) 170,400 � �- - - - - 1701400
Olher(Redflex) 200,000 �200,000 200,000 � 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Totel Eunding ,, 1,342,800 . 1,328,300 7,�67,100 _ 1,247,500 1,085,700 � 1,283,000 7p47,800
199
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
LOCAL REVITACIZATION FUND (330) Captta�Faeo�ntes P►an
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeds Fund
Pro�ect Tine: Downtown Promenade Improvements ' TIP # 52
Projed No:. cp7005
Project Type: Non-Capacity -
Project,Manager; . Ryan Vondrak/Elizabeth Chamberlain
Desciiption:
This project will fund the design,coordination,pertnKting and construction of Downtown Promenade improvemeMS:Project indudes
storm,sewer,water anA roadway improvemerrts ofDivision Street between Main St and 3rd St SWlSE.
Proaress Summarv:
Design and consWction will be completed in 2011.
_.
Future.lmpaet on Operadng Budget:
This project will have no impad on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Budget: 2ott YTDAetual 2012 11 Budget
Budget ExDendkures Budget Belanee
Adopted Budgef - - - � -
, BudgetAmendmeMS -
AdJustedBuCget - - - -
ACtlVity:
2011 YE 2012 Year End
� Funding Sourees: Pdorto 207� Estlmete 2012 Bud et 2013 Bud et P eet Total
Capital Improv.Fund - - - - - � - - � - - -
' GiaMS(FedaralJ - 2.137.966 55.100 - .2:193,066
� REET1 ' - ' '
, ONrer(GO BondJ 1.040 089 2.903,426 89,900 4�033 415
Total Funding Sourees: 1,040.069 5,047,472 145,000 � - 6:226,507
CapHal.Expandilurea: .
� � Design 1.040,089 276.035 - - 1,316,124
RIgM o1,Way - - -
� - �Consbuctfon 4765,377 145,000 � � 4�910377
� Total�Ezpendidires: 1,040,089 5,047,412 70.5,000 - 8;22&��
Forecasted Project Cost: -
Totel
' . � . � 2074 2015 2016 2017.. _ _._.�2012-2017..
� �� Funding Sources: � � � �
. Capifal Irnprov:Furid - - - - -
Grents(Federel) - - - - 55,100
� - � REET1 - • - - � � -
� � Other(GO Bond) - � � 89,900
, Total FunNng Soureea: - • - ' � - " 745,000
' Capltal ExpendiNres: " -
' DeslB� - - - - � � -
� RigM af�WaY - - ' ' '
Constnictlon 145,000
Total Ezpendilures: • - - • 145,000
GranLS�/Other Sources: Grant Funding is Federal EDA Grant.Other Funding is Local Revitalization Funding GO Bond revenue. ,
20�
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
LOCAL.REYITALIZATION FUND (330) Capita� Faci�Nies Plan
Six Year Capital FaeilRies Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projects Fund
Project Title: Citywide Wa�nding Signage
Project No: cp0616
Project rype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Jacob Sweeting
Description:
The Citywide Wa�nding Signage project has instatled vehicular guidance signs throughout the City that provide direction ro common
city destinations.The project will also installkiosks in 1ha downtown�area to provide dlrectional guidance for pedestrians. �
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on OperaBng Budget:
.
� BudgEt .. . 2077 YTDAetual 2072 77�Budget� .
Budget Expenditures Budgef Balanee
AdopfedButlget �� - - - _
Budget Ame�Mmerits �
� � - Ad/usled.Budget ' ' ' '
ACtwlty:
2011 YE 20N YearEnd
- Fwdl�Sourees: .Pdw.lo 20N Estimate 2012 Bud 2D11 B et eef Toal
� � Gene�al FuM � - 36,400 - - - 36,400
GrenLS(Fed,SYate.LoceQ . - 34,000 - �61,000 - 95,000
OMer(GO Bond) ,30 000 30 000 �
- Total FurMing Soweea: 70,400 30,000 67.000 - 161,400
Capital ExpenEltures:
Deslgn , 31,700 30,000 - - 61,700
� � RghtofWay - - - -
� Cons6uct7on � � .38 700 61 000 � 99 700
Total Exponditures: 70,�00 - 30,000 61,000 - 167,400
_ Forecasted Projea Cost:
Totel
2074 .2015 2078 2077 2072-2017
Funding Sourees: '
Geriwal Fund ' - - - - .
. - Grents(Fed.SYete.LOCaQ - - - - 61.000
Ofher(GO Bond) �
Total Funding Sourees: ' ' ' ' 61,000
. CapMa�ExpendiWres: .
�� - - ' - -
- Right o/Way • � - - .
ConsWCtion 61 OUO
.. Total Erzpenditures: . - ' ' - 81.000 "
Grants/Other Sources; �
201
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330) capital Facilities Plae
Six Year Capital Fadlkies Plan,`2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund.
Pioject Titie: • DowMown Pedestrian Lighting TIP# 57
Project Noi cp1116
aro]ect rype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Ryan Vondrak .
Desoriptioe:
TAis.project will fund fhe design,coordination,pertnilting and.conswc[ion of Downtown street lighting replacemeMS.. � �
Procress Sdmmarv:
Design end construction will be completed in 2011. � -
Future Impact on Opereting Budget
This�project will have no�im{iact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
BUdgEt: 2011 YTOAeWaI 2072 � 17 Budga!
, � . 6udgee ExpenA�tures eudgee . . .�sa�anee�
AdoPtetl Budget - - . �. . -
� � � ButlgetAmendmeMS - - �- � -
� Atljusted Bud9et - - - -
Activity: - -
� 2011 YE 2072 Year End
Funding Sources: Prim to 2011 Estimate 2072 Bu et 2079 Bud Pro' d Total�
. Capital Improv.Fund - - - �- - -
Grents(Federal) ' - ' - -
REEl2 ' ' - - -
' � � Ofher(GO Bond) � 445 500 39 500 485 000
Total Funding Sources: - �445,500 39,5UU - 485,000
� � .Capilal Expendltures: � .
Design - 16,500 - - 16.500
. Right o/WaY - - - -
� ConsWCtion 429000 39500� � 468500
Total E�endlN�es: - 445.500 '.38.500 • 485,000 � .
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
7omi
' � 2014 .2075 _ 2018 2017 _ 2012•201Z �
Funding Sources: - -� -- -
� ,Capl�l lmprov.Fund - - - ' -
. � - Grants(FederaQ. - ' _ - -
REET2 - - - - �
OMer(GO Bond) - - - �39 SDO.
TotalFundingSourees: - - - �• ,89,W0
CapHal Expenditures: � .
� ��9n � - . �- - -
RightWWay - - - - -
ConsWCtion 39500. � .
Total Expenditures: - - , • � . .39.500
Grants I Other Sources: Other Funding is Local Ravitaliration FunEing GO BonC revenue.
202
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan �
LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330) � Capital Facilities P1an
Six Year Capital Facillties Plao,2011-2016 Capiql Pinjects Fund
Projea rrt�e: Downtown Sculpture Garden
Project No: CpXXXX
Project Type: No�-Capacity
Project�nanager. Elizabeth Chamberlain
Deseriptlon: '
Create a Downtown Sculpture Garden with approwrtiately 10 pertnanent pedestals throughout Downtown Aubum that will'
have rotaGng'sculpture art. �
Progress Summary:
Design and Construction in 2011
Future Impact on Operating BudgM:
Budget for the rotating sculpture aA. .
` 6udget: zo,, rmnen,ai 20,2 „eudees
. Bud9� E�V�eMiNres Bud9et Balm��a.
. . .. . . AdoptedBudget -. � - - - - - -- - - .
Budget Amendments - - -
. � AdjustBd Budyet . ' ' ' ' '
ACtivity:
- . . . • ... 2077 YE 2072 Year End � .
� �Funding Sourees: '�� Prior to 2011 Esdmata 2072 Bu et . 2013 Bud et �.Pro eU Total
� UnresVicted Cap.Improv.Revenue - - - � - -
� GrarAS - - - ' -
REET - - � - - -
� Other(GO Bonds) 40 000 10 000 50 000
� Total Funding Sourees: � . - 40,000 70,000 - 30,000
Caplfal ExpendlNres:
- Deslgn - 10,000 - - 10,000
� Rignta�WaY - - - - -
ConsWCNOn 30 000 10 000 40 000
Tofal Expenditures: � - - 40,000 . 10,000 - 50,000
Forecasted Project Cost:
To}al
2074 .2015 2016 2017 2012-2017
Funding Sourees: -
UnrestNCted Cap.Improv.Revanue - - - - -
Grents - - - - -
REE7 ' ' ' ' '
Ofher(GO BondsJ - - 10 000 .
Total Fundi�Sourees: - - - - - 10,000
Capital Expenditures:
DasfB^ - - - - - �.
Right o/WeY - _ .' ' '
Cons6ucNon . 10 000 �
Total Expendllurea: ' ' ' ' 70,000 � .
Grents/Other Souroes: � Other Funding�is Loeei Revitalimfion Funding GO Bond revenue.
203
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year.Capital Facilities Plaa,'2011-2016 Capiql Projeets Fund
ProjectTitle: NW City.Hall Plaza Improvement
Project No: cp1115
Project Type: Non-Capacity .
Project Manager: Elizabeth Chamberlain
Description:
Improvement the NW City Hall Plaza to incorporate some design features from the recently.completed City Hall Plaza
improvements tfiat could include sidewalk improvements, pavement improvemerrts, lighting,signage,arid landscaping. -
�� Progress Summary: -_ ---
' Design and begin consUUC6on in 201 t Complete construdion in 2012.
Futyre lmpact_on Opeiating Budget:
, � Mairrtenance of the piara space.
BudgEt: � � 2011 YTD Aetual 2072. � 17 Budget
� Budgat Expendkures BuEget Balanaa
Adopted Budgef ' - ' -
Budget Amendments
� AdjuSted Budget ' ' ' '
ACtivity:
, � 2071 YE � 2012 Yea�End�.
� . ' . Funding Sourees: Pdor to 20N� Eatlmate 2012 Bud � t �2013 Bud et. .Pro edt Totsl_::
Cap.Improv.Revenue - - 382,000- - �-� 382,000
Grairts - - � - -
REET - - - - . .
orner(co eonds) ee oon s o0o aa obo
Total Funtling Sources: • 88;000 388,000 --� - " -- �- � 476,000
� CapMal E�anAiNres: .
� . Deslgn - 88,000 - - � �88,000
Right ol WaY - ' - -
ConsWCtbn. 388 000 ___388 000
� � TotalEapendiWres: - 88,000 �88,000 • � -�----.--478,000
Forecasted Project Cost: '
Totaf
� _ 2014 2015 2076 2017 2012-2D17�
- Fundirq Sourcea: -
Cap.Improv.Revenue • - - � �- � 382,000 �
� Grents - - -
' REET - - - - -
Other(GO BaMs) � -6 000�
� Total Funding Sou�: . . - _ . . - -- -- - -� 388A00
� Capifal F�endiNres: �
..��9^ - - - �- -
RigMOfWaY - ' - - -
. Canstnidlon 388,000
� Tofal ExpenEl(ures: ' . ' - - ' 388,000
Grems I Other Sources: Other Funding is Loeal Revitali�tion Funding GO Bond revenue.
204
City ofAubum Capital Facilities.Plan
LOCAL_REVITALIZATION FUNO (330) : . - CapKa� FaeUNies Plan
Six Year CapKat Facilities Plan,2011-2016 Capital Projeds Fund
Projed Tiue: Dowrrtown Fumiture �
ProjeobNo: cploaa , _
ProjectType: Non-Capacity ' ' ,
Projea Manager. Elizabeth Chamberlain �
DeseMption: ' '
Continue.the themes from the City Hall Plaza and Promenade projects into other areas of Downtown Aubum through use of '
streetfiumiture (e.g.benches,Vash/recycle recepfacles, bicycle racks). � '
Progress Summary:
Design 2011 and construdion in 2012
Futore Impact on Operating Budget:
Buaget: zo,; . rTU aa� �o+z i;e�d�
s�a�s �oaia,r� e�a0ec se�o
� � � � Adopfed Budget 70,000 - 25,000 -
� - � Butlpet Amendmenfs - -
� AdJusteC Budget ' - - -
A�:tlVfty:
, - � 2011�YE 2012YearEnd
Funding Sources: . Prior to 20N Estimate 2072 Butl et ...2013 Bud ab . P - Total - �
� Unres6ietedCep.Improv.�Revenue • - - . - . .- - . �-
. � Grants - - ' - -
REET - ' ' - -
- Other(GO Bo/Ms) _ - 10 000 25 000 - 35 000
� � � Total Funding Sources:. � � - 70,000 25,000 - 35,000
' Capital Expenditures: �
" . � Design � • 10,000 - - 10,000
, RIgM o/WaY - - ' - -
� , Consvuction , - 25 000 - 25 000
��TMaI Expendkures:. . - 10.000 25,000 • 35,000 �
Forecasted ProJeM Cost:
� 7ota1
. 2014 .Z075 2018� ]017 2012-2077
PundingSources: ' -- --- �
Unresbicfed CeP.Improv.Revenue - ' ' ' ' '
Grants ' - - - '.
REFf� ' ' - - -
Other(GO Bonds) � 25 000 �
� Tofal Funding Sourees: � - � - - - 25,000 �
Capital Expendidues: - .
. . ��9� . - ' - - -
� RigAt ol Wey - - - - �
Construction 25 000
. Total Expendkures:� . � - . • - 25,000
Grama/Other Sources: Other Fumling is Local RevNaliration Funding GO Bond revenue. �
2�$
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan .
6APITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Cap�ta�Fac�nt�es P�an .
Six Year Capital Facilkies PIan,2012-2017 _Caplta4projects Fund
. - -- __
ProjectTine: CitywideSidewalklmprovemeMs TIB�f32
Projec[No: V8ri0us •
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Annual) •
Project Managec Seth �ckstrom .
Deseription:
Projed uvill fund sidewalk improvements to a variety of locations throughout the city. A sidewalk inventory was completed in
2004. Annual projects are seleded based upon criteria such as:gap closure,safe walking routes.to schools,completion of
downtown pedestrian corridor or"linkage"; connectivity to transit services,ADA requirements, and"Save our 5treets"-(SOS)
project locations.
Progress Summary:
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None
.
eudget: zott rroaema� zot2 iiB�,a9�
Budget Expandkures Budget ��� Bslanee
Atlopred 8udget - � - - -
BudgetAmendments � �
Adjusted Budget - . � - -
Ad'rvity:
� (Previous Yrs)� 2077 YE . 2012 Year End �
� . � : Funding Sourcas: Pdor to 20N _Estimate 2012 Bud �t 2013 Bud et Pro eeS Tota6 .
� � . �Unrestn'ctedCap.Impmv.Revenue - 180,D00 . � 20,000� -. - . 180,000� � - � , 380,000 �
GraMS(Fed.State.Local) - - - - - .
� REET2 - - - ` -
OMer
. TotalFundingSourees: - 780,000 20,000 �- � � 780,000� -- � 380,000 � �
Capital Expenditures: ..
Design - 2,000 2.000 10,000 '4,U00
� RghtO/Way� - - - - .'. -
� Constmcfion 170 000 18 000 170 000 �358 000� �
� � Tofal Expendidires: • 772,000 20,000 180,000 782,000 ��
Foreeasted Project Cost:
� ' `TOtal ..
. � 2014. 2015 2076 201Z . —:2072-�7L. .
. . Funding Sources: . . . _ _ . ._ _ _
Unrestrlcted Cap.Improv.Revenue 20,000 180,000 20.000 180,000 . - 600,000
� � Grants(Fed.S(ate,Local) - - � -_ - .. .
REET 2 ' ' ' _ '
Otl�er
� Total Funding Sourcm: 20,000 180,000 20,000� -' - -180.000 � - -600,000� � .
CapMalEzpendLLures: .
� - Design 2,000 10,000 2,000 10,000 36,000� .
� Right o/Way - - - -
Constructlon 18 000 170 000 1 B 000 170 OUO- 564 000�
Total Expanditures: 20,000 180,OOD 20,000 � 780A40 BOO,DUO
GraMa I Other Sourees:
206
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL:IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Cap�ta�Fae�llties P�an
Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan,2012-2017 Capltal Projeets Fund
Project T(tle: Traffic Calming Improvements TIP#33
Project No: cpxloocc
Project Type: Non-Capacity(Annual)
Projed Manager. Pablo Para
Dese�ipUon:.
. The Citys Neighborhood TraRic Calming Program was adopted by City Council in November of 2005: Staff receives complaints from
citizens and then gathers data to wnfirtn that a speading issua and/m cut through traffic issue is present This money is for physipl
improvemeMs to the streets once all other optionshave been exhausted. Physipl�improvements may include items such�as�IigMing,
signing,striping,spead humps;speed tables,chicanes,traffic�circles,.and median treatments.
Progress Summary:
Program continues to implement Jaluable safety enhnancements citywide.2011 Improvements inGude construction of
pedesfian activated crosswalkwaming beacons, signage improvemants and speed cushion installations.
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
Mnual maintananca.cost for thase improvemerrts�are esUmated to be '
Budget: Zott vroaemai zo�z �t eudge�
. Budget Expendkures Budget Balaneo -
Atlopted Bud9et - - - � -
� Butlget AmendmeMS -
� � Adlusted 8udget - . • ' '
AGtivity:
� (Revloue 2 Yrs� ,2011 YE 2012 Yeer End
, Funding Sources: Prior to 2011 Estimate 2072 Bud � 2019 Bud et Pro eM Tofal
Uniestrlcfed Cap.Improv.Revenue � - - - - -
crants(Fea.srare.Lowq - - - - -
REEf2 - - - - -
Other(Redliex) � 200 000 200 000 200 000 800 000
Total Funding Sourees: . - 200,000 200.000�. 200,000 B00,000
, � . CapMal Expenditures: .
Design - 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000
� Rlgnt oI way � - - - - -
Consbvdion � 180 000 180 000 780 000 360 000
' � Total ExpOndkUreB: . • 200,000 200,000 . .200,000 400,000
Forecasted ProJect Cost:
TMaI
. 2014 2015 2018 2U17 Z012-2077�
" �. Funding Sources: � - �
Unrestricfed Cep.Improv.Revenue � - - - - -
Granfs(Fed.SYate.LOCaI) � _ _ _ _ _
- REET2 ' - - - - �
� OtAer(Redflex) 200 000 - - �200 000� 200 000� 200 000 1 200 000
� � Total Funding 9ources: . Z00,000 200,000 200,OOD � 200,000 1.200,000 �
Capital Expendilurea: �
� Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000
RlghtolWay � - �- - . -
Consbuc6on 180 000 180 OOD 180 000 180,000 1 080 000
. � Total EXpendiMes: � . . 200,000 -200,000 200.000 - 200.000 � 1.200.000
� Grents/Othar Sourcea:.RedFlex money transferted from Gerreral FunO. - � � .
2�7
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPRAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) cap�ta� Fae��itles e�an
Six Year Capifal Faeilities PIan,2012-2077 CapltalProjeets Fund
Project Taie: Traffic Signal Improvements 71P#34
Projed Na cpxxxx '
Project Type: NOn-CapeClty(Mnual)
Project Manager. Scott Nutter
Description:
This'projeG includes prowdng and installing lra�c signal equipmant upgrades for existing signals as weli as safety/capaci[y� �
improvements for existing and/or new signals:The City uses accident and.t2ffic count data to ideMify intersections imneed of .
� improvamenis. • � � . � . .
Progress Summary:
Projed oontinues to complete intersection safety improvemenLS. .
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
None '
Budget: 20tt YTDAetual� 2012 118ueget .
Budget ExpanAlbires . Budget. � .Bslence
Adopled Budget - - - -
Budget Amendme/rts �
adjus�ed eudyet - - -
Activity:
(Previous 2 Yrs)� 2011 YE � 2p12 Year End
� FundingSourees:. Primto20N Estlmale .2012.Bud et �2073Bud e! __ Pro'eet7otal
Unrestncted Cap.ImPmv.Revenue .- . ._-� - - ----- --- -� - .
, G/aMS(Fed.SYete.lncaQ - - - � - -
REET2 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000
Other
Total Funding Sources: - 175,000 � -775.000 .'� 175,000- � � 350,000
Capltal Expandituras: .
� - Design - 10,000 10,0oa 10,000 20,000 .
� Rlght o!WaY - - - ' -.
� Cons6uction 165,000 - �165000 165000 �330000
� Total�Expenditmes: - 175,000 175,000 �775,000 � .350,000
Forecasted Projed Cost:
Total
� 2014 2075 '2016 .. 2077... - --2012-2077__. �
. . Funding Sourees: -. . . � . .. -� - - . --
Unrestricted Cap.Improv.Revenue - - - - � - _ .
� �Giartfs(Fetl.SYate.LoceQ - - ' - .
� REET2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 �1,050,000
Other
. . TotalFwMingSourees:. 175,000 �175,000 ' 175,000 � - 175,000 � - "-- 1:030,000
� Capital ExpendiWres: � .
- Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000
R'ghl o/Way ' - ' - •
Consbuafion 165 000 165 000 165 000 165 000 - .490 000
Total Expendilures: 175,000 175,000 775,000 -175,000 " 1,050,000
Grenis/Other Sources: � .
2�8
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year CapIWI.Factlitles PIan,2012-2017 Capital.Projects Fued
.RrojBCtTRIe: DOwfltOWll RBVIt'dllZ�lOfl �
Project No: cp328e
Projea type: Annual
Projed Manager. Dowdy
Deseription:
� � Ongofng projact to purchase property,construd new buildings,�and renovata existing shucturea .
Progress Summary:
Futu►e:lmpaet on Operating Budget:
Budget 2ott vroaceuai xot2 t} suaeee
� Budget� � E�endilurea Budget �Balance .
_ . Adopted Budget , _ , ' ' . '
Butlget Amendmerrts -
� Adjusted BWget . . . -� - - �. .. .
' ACtiVity:
. � . (PreWOUS 2 Yrs) �11 YE 2012 Yem EnA
Funding Sourees: ' PAor to 2071 Eetlma[e 20tt Bud at �2013 BuA et Pro Total �
, Unrasvlc[ed.Cep.Imp/ov.Rev 500,000 - - - 500,000
- Generef Fund - - - 500.000 -
REET - - - - -
ONer
, , �Tetal Funtling 5oureea: 500,000 -� - 500,000 500,000
Gpipl ExpeMitures:
� Deslgn 100.000 - - 100,000 100,000
RigMO/Wey - - - - -
. � ConsVUCNOn � - 400000 400 000 a00 000
� �TOtal E7�enCitures: 500,000 ' •� - � 500,000 500.000
Forecasted Project Cast:
Tmal
, _ ' 2014 2015 2078 2017 2012-2077
Funding Sourcas:
UnreshiCed Cap.Improv.Rev - -� - - -
Generel Fund , 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,000,000
� REET , ' ' ' ' '
Other 500 000
Total Funding Soureea: .. .. 500.000 SOO,U00 - 500,000 SOD.000 2,SOO.00D �
Capital Expendltures:
Deslgn 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 500,000 .
Righto(Way - - - - -
. Constructlon 400 000 400 000 400 000 400 000 2 000 000
TofalExpenAilures: .. - 500,000 500,000� 500,000 � 500,000 2,500,000
Grents/Other Sources: .. . . . � �
209
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capka�Fau�n�es P�an
Siz Year Capital Facllities Plan,2012-2017 Capllal Projecffi_Fund
Projea TiUe: Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project TIP#13`
Projea No: cp0767
Project Type: Non-Capacity
Project Manager. Jeff Dixon/Leah Dunsdon
Deseription: '
The project consists of the design, construction, maintenance and monitoring of approximately 2.2-acres of wetiand creation
and approzimately 0.4-acres of wetland enhancement within the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sewer U6lity in
order to compensate for approzimatety 1.6-acre weUand loss on the Mohawk Plastics property(Parcel# 1321049056). The
project was approved under an ezisting agreement approved by Resolution No.4196,June 2007.
Pmgress Summary:
The City reoerved the DOE WQ Certification,WDFW HPA, and on May 7, 2009,the Artny Corps of Engineers(Corps)404
wepand pertnit(NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid specifications and construdion plans were prepared and construction
began in October 2U09. Construction was completed in January 2010 and the project is ourrently within the 10=year
monitoring period,whichinvolves annuat maintenance, monitoring and reporting.
_._.. _ _. .. _ . _ .
Future impaet on Operating Budget:
It is antiapated Shat annual maintenanca,�monitoring and reporting on the perfortnance of the wetland mRigation project,wfll tie..required
' for�a period of 10 years, in conformance with permit requirements. After the successful conGusion of this 10-year monkoring period,
which is anticipated to.be in December 2019,ongoing operation expenses should be minimaL �
BudgBY. � � 2011 YTD A�tuai, . 2012 17 Butlget
e�ag� ��dw;re8 e�deee e.ia��
Adopted Budget _ . .. . ,
8udget.4rtrendmems
Adjusted Budget - - - -
ActlVity: ,-
' 2011 YE 2072 Year End
Fundfng Sources: Prbr to 201T. _. EsUmaoo � 2012 Bu et. 2013 Bud - Pro ��Total.
� General Fund - - - - -
� Grents - ' - - - . -
� Bond Pmceeds - � - - -
I . Treflie Impact Fees 455,000 25.000 �25,000 20,000 505,000
REET 2 176 150 176,150
.Total Funding Sourcas: 837,150 25.000 23,000 . 20,000 B81,160
, ,' Caplfal FxpendRUrea: �
�Design 748.300 - ' - 148,300
RigMofWay - - - - -
ConsWeOon 482 850 25 000 25 000 20 000 532 B50 �,
Total E:pendRuras: 631,150 25,000 25,OOD . 20,000 ' 881,750
FooeeasteC Project Cost:
Tofal
� 2014 2015 2078 2017 �2072-Y077
' ' Funding Sources: � .
General Fund - - - - _
Grents ' - � - -
Bond Proceeds - - - -
� TraRlclmpectFees 25,000 20,000 25,000� 65,OOD 180,000
, REET 2
Total Funding Sourees: 25,000 20.000 25,000 65,000 180.000
Capifal Ezpenditu�es: -
Des/gn - - - .- -
�Rightol.Way - - - ,-
ConstrucGOn 25,000 20 000 25 000 � 65 000 180 000
� Totel ExpanAitures: 25,000 20,000 23,000 65,000 180,OU0
Grants�/Other Sources: .
Z10
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) - Capital Eacilities�Plan
Six Yea�Capftal Faeilities Plan,2012-2017 Capital Projeets Fund
Project TiUe: Local Revltal'�zation
Rrojed No:
Projed Type:
Project Managec
Description• •
To pay debt service wsts on GO bonds issued for the�Doumtown Promenada ImprovemeMs. Local Revltalization financing is a credit
on,the State's portion of sales taz that the Cky will receive oyer the next 25 years. . '
Progress Summary:
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
Budget: zoti vroaesusi zatz �t suneei
� . . . � . � . Budget Expend@ures� Budget Balent8 . �
AdoPted Buii9et - - - � � --
� 8udgetAmendments� � ' - �
� AdjustedBudge[ - - _ ._
ACtivity: .
. ' 2011 YE 2012 Year End
� . FurMing Swrces: '� � �.� Prlor to 2017 � -Estimate .4012 Bud e!� 2019 Budget Pro eet Total
� UnresVletetl�Cep.lmpronve . . .- . . - - .._ . - - . -
Grarrts - � - - - -
REET 2 , 253 700 273 200 214 300 213 300 681 200
� Total_FundingSourees: � . 253,700 213,200 270.300 213,300 681,2D0
CapMel Expundih�res: . .
�� - - - - '
ConshucGon - - - ' -
Long-Term Debt Service � 253 700 �213 200 214 300 2'13 300 881 00
Total EspendMures: . _ $59,700_ ... . 273,200 214,300 213,300 687,200
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
rom�
� 2014 2015 20'IB 2017 2012-2017
Funding Sources: - � .
UnresfriUed Cep Improve � - � • � - - - -
Grants . _ ' ' '
REE7'2 217 100 136 500 135 100 133 000 1 049 300
Total Fimding Soureas: 217,100 136,500 135,100 133,000 �7,048,300 �
. CepMal Expendkures: • . - . � � . .
pesign - ' ' - -
� Conshuc6on � - - � - - -
Long-Term Debt Service . � , 217 100 136 500 135 100 133 000 1 049 300
Total Expendltures: . 277,100 198,500 155,100 133,000 7,049,300
� . � Grams/Other Sources: � ' . � .
211
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
CAPITAL.IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) capiea�,paeine�es P�an
Six Year Capital Faoilities,Plan,2012-2017 Capital ProJeots_Fund
Project Title: Publfc Art
Project No: pb-art
Project Type:
Projed.Manager. BrCWCf .
Descriptfon: ,
The Ciry designates$30,000 annually toward the purchase of public art,for placement at designated locations throughout
the City.
Progress Summary: '.
Arts Commission will meet to assess future needs and seek approval from City Council on placement..
Future Jmpact on Opereting BudgMi °'"
' None
Budger zo�� rro a�eeuai 2otz t't suagee
eudget. Ezpena�soies . saagec � � sateoee
Adopted Budget _ . - - - . �. .
Budget Amentlments
Adjusted Budget ' ' ' - .. ,_ . -._ '
/�GtlVlh/: . . . . . .
2077 YE . , 2D72 Year End
Funding Soureea: _ PdorM 2011 . Eatimata 2072 Bu �ef . ��2019�Bud et Pro edTOtal
UnresMcteOCap.Improv:Reventie� - - 30,000 � 30,000 3U,000
Grents - - - - . .
. . R� - - - - - -
� . Other � ' - .
Total Funtling Saurces: - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 ,
Capllal ExpendlWres: .
Design - - '. - - .
Rlg�tofWay - - � - � . � � -
- Consbuction 30 000 � 30 000 30,000
� Total E�andMures: - - 30,000�' 30,000 �0,000
Forecasted Projed Cost: _ - -
TMaI
20�4 2015 2016 • 2077 .. 2012,2017.
FundingSourees: . . .;- - --�-�----- -
Unresficfed Cap.lmprov.Revenue 30,000 30,000 30,000 � 30,000 � 180,000 �
.. GIaMS • - - � -� ' -
.. . . REET - - - ' . . -. _.
Other
� Totel Funding Sources: 30,000 30,000 30,000- � �•�30,000� 180,000
' Capftal E�endituras: .
Design - - - •� -
� � Righto/Wey - - - - - -
Canstrucfion 30 000 30 000 30 000 30 000 180 000
Tofal Fxpenditures: 30.000 30,000 30.000 30.000 � 180,000 '
GraMS/Other Sourcas: �
212
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
GENERAL FUND, Non-Departmental Capital Facilities Plan
SIx Year Capitalfaeilities Plan,2012-2017 General Fund
Project Title: Mill Creek Restoration
Project No: cp0746
Project 7ype: Non-Capacity
Project Manager: Andersen
Description:
Stream restoration project that includes invasive spedes removal, stream channel restoretion for improved conveyance and
habitat,and native planUngsalong Mill Creekbetween Main Street and sVeam crossing at SR 167. Projed inGudes design
evaluatlon and potential capadty improvements at the 15th Street NW road culvert for Mill Creek.
Progress Summary:
Restoration of Mill Creek is on-going and builds on stream restoration and habitat projects that have been pertortned in
previousyears. One element of this effort is fhe restoration of the lNetland SK reach of Mill Creek.The City has entered into
a cost share agreement with Army Corps of Engineers to design to stream restoration improvements for the Wetland 5K
reach;design is scheduled to be completed in 2012.
Future Impact on OperaUng Budget:
Nune
sudger. so;, vro neti,a� mu t;s�dges
- � Budget Ex{iendltures BuOget ' Balance
, � Adopted Budget ' - - - -
Butlget Ainendmems - - - -
. . Adjusted Budget . ' . ' - ' '
Activity:
zo++ire zo�z r�r�a
� Funding Sourcas:. Prior to 2011 Estlmate 2012 BuA 2013 Bud et. Pm aet Total
GenerelFuntl - - 10,000 10,000 �10,000
GreMa - 200,000 - - 200,000
� Ofher ' ' • ' '
. �Tralllc Impact Fees . • - - - -
REET2
Total Funding Sourees:- • 2D0,000 10,000 10,000 270,000
Capital ExpandlLUres:
Deslgn - 200:000 2,500 2,500 202,500
Right a/WaY - ' ' ' '
ConsWCtlon 7 500 7 500 7 500
Tofal F�cponAlNros:. - 200,000 70,000 10,000 210,000
Forewstetl Project Cost:
Tofal
2074 2015. 2018 2017 2012-2077
� Funding Soureas:�
Generel Funtl . � - - - - 20,000
Grenta� � - - - - -
ONer • - - - -
Tratfic fmpact Fees ' ' ' ' ' '
REET2
Total Funding Sourees: - � • - • 2D,000
Cepihl Expendltures: �
Design - -. - - .5,000 �
� Right o/Way - - - - - .
Construc8on 15000
� Tofal FzpendiLires: ' ' ' ' 20.000
Grants/Other Sources: King Conservatlon District($200,000) �
213 �
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
��
_ �� �°�'
'T` . .r''f.��,�,,�'�-.-�."'����:�,,,vr^,-'"`�s�,' . T �
CITY OF �...._.���� ....--A-� :�� � .
��
_��----�-�-
. �
� ,�,,:
�.� ..._ _ � ....r ,..��
=.�,.. L.� ;� _,._,•. _.:._
,:.: — . �-: .----- �..-
��' � �:� �: �
� .x „
,, _ ..�. � .
, -
* �- r� .,.. �.-
y �
��� ^"w=:�:���
" �k MORE THAN �OU IMAGINED
� .
214
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT
Current Facilities
The City of Auburn operates the Aubum Municipal Airport; providing hangar .and tie-down
facilitiesAeasing space for aircraft-related businesses. As of 2006, there were approximately
149,000 take-offs and landings (aircrait operations) at the airport annually. Table A-1 "Facilities
InVentorjr' lists the facilities with cuRent capacity and location. .
Level of Seryice (LOS)
The Aubum Municipal Airport Master Pian Update 2001-2020 provides a maximum runway
capacity (LOS standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annually; one take-off or landing equals
one aircraft aperation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal, Aviation,AdminisVation (FAA).
The FAA requires the airporF to have the capital facilfties capacity (i:e., runways, taxiways,
holding areas, terminal, hangars, water/sewer system, etc.) necessary to.accommodate.100%
of aircxaft operations.during any one year. ,.By 2020 the Airport Master- Pian foreqsts the
number of operations to be 193,189-well below the capacity of the airport runway.
Capital Facilities P�ojects and Financing. ,
The City's Airport facilities include three non-capacity capital projects at a cost of $1,389;500.
These projects are for facilities repairs and improvements. Tabie A-2 shows the proposed
financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery during the six years
2013—2018. "
TABLE A-1
Facilities Inventory
Airport
caraciTV -
FACILITY.� �M Alrc'aft� � p of Feet LOCATION
Existinginventory: . '._ - .
Hangars�� ' 145 400 23rd Street NE
Tiedowns 214 400 23rd Street NE
ir SMp � 3.400 400 23rd Street NE
Tota/Existing Inventory 359 - 3,400 .
Proposed Capaciry Projects:
Norre
Totel Proposed Capecily Projects - -
' . 2017 Pro eMd InveMO Total � 359 � � 3,400
21S
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE A-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
AIRPORT
2012 . 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
Canacitv Proiects: - - -- - - - -
None -
Non-Caoacitv Proiects:
1 Airport Sewrity
Gapital Costs � 15,000 140,000 . - - - - 155,000
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund 15,000 20,000 - - - - 35,000
Granf - 120,000 _ . - - - - .__ . __720,000_
2 Hangar Roof Repair/ReplaeemeM .
Gapital Costs „ 200,000 - - - - - 20U,000
Funding Sources:
AirpoR Fund __ 200,000 - - - - 200,000
3 General Repair&Main£Projects
Capital Costs 159;500 175,000 175,000 175,000' 175,U00 175,000 '1,034,500
Funding Sources:
Airport Fund 159,500 8,800 8,800 8,800 8,800 8,800 203,500
G2MS(FAA) - 166,200_ _ 166200 166,200 166,200 166,200 . 831,000
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
Capacity Projects - - - - - - -
Non-Capacity Projects 374,500 315,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 775,000 1,389,5D0
Total Costs 374,500 315,000 175,000 775;000 175,000 175,000 1,389,500
FUNDING SOURCES:
Airport Fund 374,500 28,800 8,800 8,800 8,800 8,800 438,500
Grants(Ped,Siate,locaq - 286,200 166,200 166,200 166;200 166;200 _ 951.000
Total Funding 374,500 315,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,389,500
216
City ofAuburn Capital Fqcilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities.Plan
Six Year CapiWl Facilities Plan,2012-2077 EMerprfseFunds
Project ritie: Airport 5ecurfty Projects � .
Project No: Cp0713
Project Type; .
Project,Manager. Garcia
__.. ._ _ _
DeseripUon• -
� � Increased sacurity idant�ed as one of the highest priority naeds for the airport in the 2005 Developmant Plan. �
Progress Summary:
� Future Impaet on Operatfng Budget: �
None �- � . � � '
,' Bueget•'' 2oii rronewai 2otz fts�dgee
. � 6uagee Expenmwrea auagee ss�enee
. - .. . Adopfed Budget � � � � -
. , Budget Amendmenfs �
- Adjusted Budgef' .' . ' _ ' .
. - /�Ct�Vlhl: . .
2071 YE 2012 Year End
�Funding Sourees: . . .Pdw to 2071 � EsUmate . 2012 Bud 2013 Bud Pro'eet Total
� � �UnrestrictedAirportRevenue � , - - -� � �15,000 � - 20,000 � 15,000
'� Cararrta(Fed,Stare,Locaq - - - �t20,000 -
OMer
� . TotalFundingSourees: ' . - . 75.000� - 740,000 75,000
� . . Cspital E�endkures: �
�� - - - - -
� . Righto/WaY - " - - - -
� ConstruCtlon. � - 15 000 140 000 15 aoo
� TctabE�yandituras: � � . - - 75.000 �740,000 75,000
Foreeasted.ProJeet Cost: -
Total
� • 2013 ' 2014� . 2015 2076 .2017-2016 �
' Funding Sourcas: . . . .
" UnresMcted Alrport Revenue . - - - - 35,000 ,
Grants(Fetl,State.Local) � � - �. . - - 120,000 �
OMer
, Total Funding Sourcas: � . . -� . � -� 155,000
_ Capifal E.�endKures:
Desi9^ - - ' - - ..
Right ol Way - � � �- - ' - - �
Conshudion 155 000 �
. Total Expendltures: ' ' ' ' 1fS,00p
� G2nt!Other Sources: � � � � ��
21�
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) capua�Faauties P�an .
Six Year Capital Fac(IkiesPlan,2012-2017 Enteryrise Funds
Project 7itle: Hangar- Rows 9 �10, Roof Repair or Replacement
Project No: cp1025
Projec[Type:
Project Manager: Garcia
Deseription: "
. Rows.9.&10 Hangar.metal roof rapaired andlor replaced. � � . -
ProgressSummary:
Future lmpaet on Operatfng Budget:
Bi-annual maintenance and'�inspection cost for this project is estimated at$6,000 per year. Mairrtenance includes cleaning;painting or
sealing as recommended by 4hemanufadurec
Budget: zo�t rruaea,al zot`2 tteud9et
. Budget EzpendlWres Butlget��. Balnnee
Adopted Butlget -
Budget Amentlments -
� AdJusted Budget - • - -
, ActlVity: '
2071 YE 2072 Yeer End
FundfngSourees:.. .PrforW2077 ��Estimate 20128uA eL 2013.Bud eL .Pro'eUTOtaI
. � �UnrestrictedAirportRevenue � -� 5,000 200,000 - - 205,000
. Grants(Fetl,SYate,LocalJ • - - - -
Other
. Total Fundiog Sourees: � - � 5.000 200,000 - � , 203.000
� , � GapMal Ecpentlltures: .
� DBSign ' ' _ _ ' .
� � RightofWay - • - -
ConstrucNOn 5 000 2D0 000 205 000
� � � TotalF�cpenditures: - 5,000 200,000� - 205,000
, Forecasted Projed Cost: � .
. . . . 7otal �
' � 2013 � 2074 2D15 2076 .2011•20'I6
. . - � .FUnding Sources: � . - .
� � � � UnresMetedAiryortRevenue - - - . ��200,000
� � Grents(Fetl.State.Local) - - - . � . � - --
Ofher.
� Total Funding Sources:. - . - -� , . 7A0,000
Caplfal ExPentlilures: � .
Design ' ' ' ' '
�RghtoiWay � - - - . -
Construction� �200 000
� ToLalExpenditures: -� - . . - 200.000
Grant/ONer Soureas:
21g
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilitles Plan' ,
Six Year CepNal FaefliUes Plan,2012-2017 EMerprise Funds
Project 7itle: Airport Projeets -General Repair& Maintenance
Project Na, Cp435a
Pr`ojectType:
Projed Manager. GarCi3 �
Descriptlon: -_ --
� ��Various�airyort projects will be iderrtifled�and priontized on an annual basis as.grerrt funding.is secured.
Progress Summary:
Fulu►e Impaet'on Operating Budget:
Bydget: 2ott vinactua� zo�z tteudges
. � � . Budget _ Expandltures Budget . .Balanee
Adoptetl Budgef . . . ..
� � � Budget Amendmertfs �
- Adfuster/Bu'dgef - . - - - - .
ACtIVihl: -
� 20N YE. 2077 Year End
• � � Funding Soureas: Prim to 2011 EsNmate 2012 Bud et� �2013 9ud et � Pro ect Totel
� . . UnrestdcfetlAlrportRevenue 120,000 35,500 759,500 8,800 315,000 '
Grants�Fed,State,Local) - - - . 166200 -
OMer
. ' Total Fundfng Souroes: 120,000 35,500 759,500 775,000' 315.000
. CapNal Expenditures:
Design 12,000 10,000 7,500 17,500 29,500
Righto/Wey -� - - - -
� , Constructlon 108 000 - 25 500 152 000 157 500 285 500
Totel EryendNuras: � , - 120,000 �35,500 7�,500 - 175.000 315,000
Forecasted Projed Cost
Tohl
201� 2014 201i 2018 2011-2018
Funding Soureas: . � �
UnreslrictedAirportRevenue � 8,800 8,800 8,800 8,800 203.500
Grents(Fetl,Shate,LxaQ � � 166200 166200 166.200 766,200 831,000 �
Ofher
Total FunAing Sources:�. 175.000 175.000 775,OD0 175,000 1,034,500
Capital Expandkures: .
Design . 17,500 � 17,500 17,500 17,500 95;000 �
RightOlWaY ' ' ' ' - . �,
Consfruefion 157 500 157 500 157 500 157.500 939 500 �, �
� � Totel Expentlkures:. � - � 775,000 175,000 175,000 1T5,000 1;034.500 ' � ��
� Grant!Other Sources: �
219
City ojAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
�"� u 'r ���
�
CITY OF �:w�-�-=�-� x� .�---� g ��
_ - _ »»,a..�,.,-. _-�°^' _"�» �,.��`°
,,,� - �, �
� ,.�- � �- . i'
,%�: � --..... �.—�r,. _
�„+"'" �,;�,.�.,"'. ""'°�; '
. ���.y����. '. i,rl . � ' ':
. " . / �,�,.�..�.. ,�_� '""^.�, ' .
. f ,ar""r. � ,n...r� ., �'^,� � .
*���� r w
''� �k MORE THAN YOU I1v1AGINED
_
zzo
City of Aubum Capital Facilities Plan
CEMETERY
Current Facilities
The Cityowns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (50
acres and four buildings) that provides burial services and refated merchandise for the
community. The Pioneer Cemetery is a his4oric ceme4ery whicti is no longer used for burial
purpose§. Tatrle G-1 "Facilities Indentory" liststhe facilities along with their current capacity and
Iocation. �
Level of Service (LOS),.
The cunent LOS of 46.43 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the existing
inventory divided by the 2010 citywide population of 70,180. The proposed LOS of 60.23 burial .
plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2016
projected citywide population of75,242. In addition, the cemetery will be able to offer a natural •
_ cremafion garden. �
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing �
The City's Mountain View Cemetery facilities include one capital project at a cost of$90,000 for
repairs and maintenance, Table C-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed .by an
individual worksheet showing the project tletail.
Impact on Future Opera4ing Budgets
TFie�e are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery du�ng the six years
2013—2018.
TABLE C-1
Facilities_Inventory.
Cemetery
CAPACIT1f
FACWTY . #of burial plots/niches LOCATION
Existing/nventory:
ouirtain View Cemetery 3,170 2020 Mountain�ew Dr.
Pioneer Cemetery - 8th 8 Aubum Way No.
. Total Existing/nverrtory 3,170
Proposed Capacrty Projecfs:
New Development-Buriai Plots 475 Memory Heights
New Development-Buria/Plots 764 10th Addition
Tota/Proposed Capacity Projects 1,239
2017Pro ected Invento Total d,409
221
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE C-2
CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
CEMETERY
2072 2013 2014 2015 ._ 2016_ .2017 Total
Non-Caoacitv Proiects:
1 Cemetery-Faeilities Repair$Malntenanee
CapitabGosts 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000
Funding Sources:
CemeteryFund 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,OD0 10,000 10,000 90,000
� Grents(Fed.State.locaq - - _ .- . - - . . . -
Ofher - - - - - � - -
SUMMARY:
CAPffAL COSTS . :
Capacity Projects - - - - - - -
Non-CapacityProjects 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 t0,00D 90,000
Total Gosts 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,OD0 10,U00 90,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Cemetery Fund 10,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000
Grants(Fed,State,Locap - - _ _ _ , _
Bond Proceeds - - - - _ _ . _ �
TotalFunding 10,000. 40,000 10,000 70,000 10,000 10,000 90,000
222
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
CEMETERY FUND (436) Cap�ta�FacnR�es Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2012-2017 Enterprise Funds
Project Tine: Cemetery- Facilities Repair 8 Maintenance
Project No: cp436a �
Project:Type:
Project Manager.
Descrfption:
Repairs and Maintenance(2013)30K Failed stortn drainage system.
(2012-2016)-Columbarium niche caps 10K
Progrrss Summary:
Future Impact on Opereting Budget:
� BUdgB[: .' . , �2011 YTD Ath�al 2012 , 11 Budget. � .
- . .audget �Expenaim'es BudgaS � Balanee
' Adopted Budget - " . '
� .Budget Amendmeirts
� Ad/ustatl Budget . - - . . -
Aetivfty: —
- � .2077 YE �2011 Yem End
Funding Soureea: Prior W 2017 Estimate 2072 Bu 2073 Bud ed Total
Unresbieted Cemetery Revenue 20,000 35,000 10,000 4�,000 65,000
- G/ants(Fad,ffiete.Loca1J ' - - � - - -
Other
Total Funding Sources:� 20.000 35,000 10,000 40,000 65,000
� Capital E�endiWres:
Design ' ' ' ' '
Right o/Way ' - -� - - -
Construction 20.000 . 35 D00 70 000 a0 000 65 000
� � Total Expendriures: Y0,000 35,000 70,000 40,000 65,000
Foreeasted Projeet Cost:
Totai
, 2014 - 20�'15 Z016 2077 2012-2017
Funding Sources: . ' '
UnreshictedCemeteryReventie . 10,000 � 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000
. Grsnts(Fad.Stete,LocalJ . ' ' _ ' '
Other '
. Totel Funding Soureea: � 70,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 90,000
Capital ExpandiW�es: . .
. . Design . - - - - - '
� Righ[ofWey - - - �-
� Constructlon 10 000 10 000 10 000 10 000 90,000
� Total ExpendHuras: � 10,000 10,000 70,OOU _ 10,000 80.000
Grants/Other Sources:� � ' •
223
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
`.
. . . `� :�,i✓�`vn�.r�n � p�rtj.��
�.ITY �� � �
.
�_:.�--���„ u . ,. . �
� .�� , � ��
_. �. � .,,... �,�„ � _
.._--- � � `°�", � Y,,` ,
;.�--�-- ==; -�` =�
, �;;. _ �..
�-�� , �-, — b ;_.�...
.. ,.- "" .r- --� .._ _ � ` ;
_ T �
� 'r�y��`'~ W.,�--^� �
� �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
_
,
224
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
GOLF COURSE
Current Facilities
Th_e City of Auburn owns and operates the 1&hole Aubum Municipal Golf Course. A PGA
Class A professional is contraded to collect greens fees, operate the pro shop and snack 6ar,
proVid.e golf carts for rent, and offer a lesson p.rogram. Table GC-1 Facilfties Inventory lists the
facilities along with their cuirent capacity and location.
Level of Service (LOS)
The current LOS of 26 holes per 1,000 population is based on thg existing inventory divided by
_ _
the 201.1 citywide population of 70,180. The proposed LOSof .24 holes per1,000 population is
based on the projected inventory divided by the 2017 projected citywide population of 75,242.
Capital Facilities P.rojects and Financing
City golf course facilities include one capital project at a cost of$350,000 for rebuilding fairways '
and greens. Table GG2 shows the proposed financing plan followed 6y an individual work
sheet showing the project detail. �
Impad on Fu4ure Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecast for new golf course facilities during the six
years 2013—2018. `
TABLE GC-1
FacilRies Inventory -
Golf Course
c,ar�ncmr
FACILITY #of holes LOCATION
Exrsting/nventory:.
ubum Municipal GoH Course 18 29639 Green River Road
Total Exisfing Inventory 18
Propased Capacity Projects: .
None -
Tofal Rroposed Capacity Projects -
2017 Pro'ecteif Inverrto Total 18
225
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
TABLE GC-2
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING
GOLF COURSE
2012 2013 2014 2075 2016 __ 2017 Total
Caoacitv Proiects:
None
Non-Canackv Proieets:
1 Reco�truat Holes9,2,10
_ , _ _ . .-- -
Capital Costs - - 350,000 - - - 350,000
Funding Sources:
GoH Course Fund - - - - - _ _
Bond P.roceeds - - 350,000 - - - 350,000
Other - - - - - - -
SUMMARY:
CAPITAL COSTS
Capacity Projec[s - - - - - - -
Non-Capacity Projects - - 350,000 - - - 350,000
Total Costs - - 350,000 - - - 350,000
FUNDING SOURCES:
Golf Course Fund - - - - - - -
BondProceeds - - 350,000 - - - . . 350,000
REET - - - -
" - - "— - -- _-_
Total Funding - - 350,000 - - - 350,000
226
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
GOLF COURSE FUND (437) Capital Facfilties Rlan
8ix Year Capttal FaeilHies Plan,2012-2017 EnterpHse Funds
aroject Titie: Reconstruct Holes 1, 2, 10
Project No: cp7000c
Project Type:
Project Manager. V8n
' Deseriptionr
Renovate portion of golf course,specifically holes 1,2 and 10.
Progress Summary:
Future Impaet on Operating BudgM:
This projed witl.increase the number of rounds played throughout the course. It will complete all major golf renovations
which began in 1988.
----- - — — - -
Budget.--- - - zuio rm aea�ai zoti io sudgec
. '. � Budget Expenditures Budget. Balanee .
.. . � Adopteil Budgef . � . . � .. -.
� . . � Budget Amendrrients � .
� AdJusted Budget . � " - - � " -
ACdvily:
� . zolt vE 2ott Year End .
Funding Sourees: Pdor to 20N Eetimste 2012 Bud et �2013 Bud et�. Pro ae[Total '.
UnresMlcted Goll Revenue � - - - - �-
, Grants(Fed.Slefe�LocaO , , - . - ' - - -
.' � Bo�M Pioceeds. ' ' . . . -
D�flBf
� Tofal Furnling Sources: - . . . .
. ' � CaPital Expendltures: � � .
Desi9^ - - - - -
RightolWaY - - - - - .
Construction
Total Expendltures: • � - - - -
Foreeasted Projed Cost:
rota�
� 2074 2015 2018 2077 2072-2077
Funding Sources: - - � ,
. Unrestn'Ued GoNRevenue � � - - - - -
GraMS(Fed.SYate.LocalJ � - - - - '
BondProceeds 350,000 - - - 350,000
OMer
� � Total Funding Sources: - � 350,000 • - - 350,000'
CapMal E�enditures: .
Design � 15,000 - • - 15,000
Right o/WaY - ' ' - -
Construction . 335,000 335000
Tofal E�ryanditures: 350.000 - - - 350,000
Grarrts/Other Sources: �
�7
Ciry ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan
� "",,,,--����.. � ��
C IT'Y OF ��=�- �`�-�--�`�.��� �
�.. .�
.�
..� � .
. �
�,� µ�
. -.._-
`r ..a:'�—~ .�: ,� --�-., ,,,,�,,. .�...� ;.,u-
.;.� -�-�. -
� -- -
,,,. �; _ _.._ :_.� -._.
,; _� +
�^ �� � �� �
* ��� � �
_ �'� ,�,<.::"�' .
� � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
zz8
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan �
POLICE
Current Faeilities
Tfie City of Aubum Police Department provides a full range of law enforcement services to the
City of Aubum. The existing Aubum Correctional Facility will be utilized as a Holding Facility
after t'he South CoRectional Entify (SCORE)vacates the Jail.
Level of Service (LOS)
The City of Auburn Police Department contracts with SCORE, an outside entity,for housing of
all inmates.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The CFP dces not include any Police capital faciiities projects during 2012—2017.
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
The City.may experienoe abnomially higher jail expenses in 2011 due to the transition to
SCORE. SCORE began hiring jail staff January 1, 2011,.and existing Auburn Corrections Staff
6ecame SCORE employees:The ewsting Aubum and Renton Jails bebame SCORE facili4ies
and will be operateduntilthe new SCORE Facility in Des Moines opens. Existing contracts with
Yakima CountyCorrections were cancelled as of January 1, 2011,. Contracts for addiUonal bed
space are througfi SCORE until the.new facility is open. This includes Kitsap, Benton and
Okanogan Counties. .
The SCORE Facility is due to open Septem6er 2011. At that time, the Aubum and Renton Jails
wiU be vacated and all irimates moved to SCORE. A portion of the Aubum Jail will be used as a
temporary holding facility for juveniles and adults awaiting transportation. The BAC (Breath
Alcohol Compute�) will still be housed in the Aubum facility. ,
229
City ofAuburn CapitaLFacilities P[an
q��� � �.
.
"�'�� �
CITY OF �--� -��� �
—`� �--r�� -��� ��,,,,�:� �
��,..,,,._. _.__-- :�-�°' !
�
Q,..,�� -.�,-' ....- r�-"'
,.� ,�..:W. .�,� c
Y
�"-� -�„"` P--
yay,.l^�..�� .
� ��� �' ��'•�. � .. � . . .i ' ... .
' �� �
. . � . . . , ' � .
�k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED
230
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
FIRE PROTEGTION
CurrenYFacilities
The Valley Regional Fire Authority provides fire protection and rescue services to a 25-square
mile area which includes the City of.Aubum, the City of Algona, the City of Pacific and King
County Fire Protection bistrict 31. The Valley Regional Fire Authority operates out of four
stations, which are manned 24 hours per day. The North !Station #31 also serves as the
department headquarters and include§ a hose and training tower. Each station is assigned fire
apparetus (Engines and Aid Vehicles). Tabie F-1 "Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities along
with 4heir current capacity and location..
Level ofService(LOS)
The curreM LOS of 0.14 fre apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory
(1_0 fire aqparatus) divided by the 2011 oitywide population of 70,180. The proposed LOS of
0.13 fire appa�atus per 1,000 is based on the 2017 planned inventory (10 fire apparatus) diyided
by the 2017 projected citywide populafion of 75,242.
Capital Facilities Projects and Financing
The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one capital project at a cost•of $50,000 for Fire
_ .
3tation Facility Relocation, Enhancements 8 Improvements. Table F-2 shows the propdsed
financing plartfollowed by an individual worksheet showing the project detaiL
Impact on Future Operating Budgets
There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for fire protection during the six years
2013—2018.
23I .
City ofAuburn Capital Facilities Plan .
TABLE F-1
Facilities Inventory
Valley Regional Fire Authority.
FACILITY Fire Apparatus. Aid Vehieles Other LOCATION .
Existing Inventory: _
Sf ti ns: .
North'Station#31 1101 D St NE,Aubum
Eirst Line 1 1 -
Reserva 1 1. -
South Station#32 1951 RSt SE,Aubum•
First Line 1 1 _
Reserve 1 1 -
GSA Station#33
First Line 1 - - 2815 C St SW,Aubum
Reserve 1" - 3'-
Total ExisGnglnveniory � 6 4 $
Pr�posed InventoryAdditions:
None - -
Total Proposed Capacity Projects - - -
2017,Pro'eded ImeMo Total 6 4 3 _.
' Bw,Resarve Van,Disastar Rasponse Vehide , . ' � . ,
"-Telesquirt . �
232
City ofAubum Capital Facilities Plan
' . TABLE F-2
- CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN•PROJECTS AND FINANCING
� VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY
2012 2013 2014 2015 zo�s zon - iaai_-
Non-Caoaeitv Proleets:
1, Fire St'atlonFacility Relobation,Enhancemerks&Improvements
Capital Costs 50,000 - , - - - - 50,000
• Fundfng Sources:
Grants - - - - - - -
Bond Proceeds -. . - - - - - -
ImpacUMkigation Fees b0,000 - - - - - 50,000 .
SUMMARY: _ -
CAPITAL COSTS
. ,_ .._
Capacity.Projects - - - - - - -
„ .Non-CapacityProjects 50,000___ - - - - - 50,000
' ' Total Costs 50,000` - • - - _ - ' S0,000
PUNDING SOURCES:
: _ :Cemetery Fund - - - - - - -
, ' �GrenJB(Fed,Shate,LOCaq � - � - , - - - - -
Bond Proceeds 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
Total Funding 50,000 - - - - - 50.000
233
City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan
Valley Regional Fire Authority (653) cePOrsi Fac+iK�es Pia�
Six YearCapitalFaeilities Plan,2012-2017 /�encyFund.
Project Title: Fire Station.Facility Relocation, Enhancements 8lmprovements
Project No: cp0639
Projed Type:
Project Manager.
Deseription:
Continue study of ather Fire station needs for VRFA. Facility improvement projects a2 identlfied and priorit¢ed annually,
and subject to delay to accommodate emergency repairs:
- -
Progress Summaryi
Fire:mitigation and impad fees will be transferred to the Valley Regional Fire Authority to pay for design conVacts for the
stody of fire station ielocetlon,construction projects and facility improvements.
Future Impad on Operating Budget:
Budget: 2ptt - YTDAetual 2011 tOBuaget .
Budget Expendkurea Budget _ ,Balanee
Adopted8udget . -. . --.-- c
Budget Amendments �
Adjusted Budget - _ - _ � � _
ACtivityr:
(Prevlaus 2 Yis) 2011 YE '2012Year End
FundingSowces: Priorto2p11 Estlmate Y0126ud et 2073B.. . —.P`o�tTOtel
G2ms - ' . - _ _. _. .
Bontl Proceeds. . - - - -
ImpacVMltigatlon Fees 212 100 �� 262 300 50 000 524 400
Total Funding Sourees: 212,100 262.300 50,000 - - --� � 574,dpp
CapMal ExpandiNres:
��° - - - - -
RigMO/Way • - _
Consnuction� 2�2 100 262 300 50 000 524 400�
� Total Expendltures: 212,700 262,500 50,000 - 524,400
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total
2074 2075 ZO16� 2017 ..2012-2077
Funding Sourees: - ---- - - �
Grarrts - - ' ' -
� � Bond Proeeeds - _ _ � _ _
Impecf/MltigafionFees � �50000� �.
T�I Funding Sources: _ . . � ._ � ��0� �
Capita�F�endkures:. ,_
.Desi9^ - - - - � -
Righto/Way - _ _ _ .
CO^s��0� - 50 U00
�TOtal EzpendiWres: - ' - ' ��
234 �
��F "-%%'' Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�U�JRICT
' WASHINGTON
/� _ .:
:�
_. � -1 , i
I
�
�
r
CHAPTER 3.
NON-MOTORIZED ��- �• `
TRANSPORTATION �"'�
" :..�. . ._;. .,�w
. , ,��,�!�
' o,'*" 'k�%l7�-�' j
Non-motorized tcansportation is an integxal
component of Aubum's ccansportadon Riding on the Interurban Trail
system. Non-motorized travel includes �e healthy community principles espoused
wallcing, birycling, and equesttian tcavel, as by PSRC through the Destinaliox 2030 update
well as emerging modes. The City seeks to process aud Vi.rion 2040. It also inueases
enhance the non-motozized lravel ��g opportunities foi Ciry pzojects.
envizonmeat both for zecseational txavel and
trips that might othecwise be taken via a caz '17�s chaptet is divided into thxee subsections:
oi bus in ozder to unpmve mobility and pedestiau travel, birycle tcaoel, and
envuonmental health. equestrian traveL Each subsection contains
an assessmeat of existing condirions and
The City zecognizes that the evolution of the needs, followed by guidelines foz
transportation system has favozed �e development of the futuxe system.
automobile as a mode of travel. A side effect
of this piocess has been the etosion of 3.1 Pedestrian Travel
conditions favoxable to non-motoazed tsavel.
This chapter seeks to expand txavel choices As an ucban centex, the City encourages
by fostering conditions in which non- �sportation planning that emetges fcom a
motorized modes aze a realistic and amacdve �� ]and-use plan based on a community
tnvel opdon. vision. In this vision, Auburn supports
Planning and developing a strong non- �� density housing in the downtown;
motoxized network supports several state and aeighbozhood commercial distcicts; and
national acts, including Washington's Gzoavth ���aped, pedestdan-oriented stceet and
Management Act, Clean Au Act, and sidcwalk design. T'his pattem of development
Commute Trip Reduction Act, and the reinforces a positive pedestrian envixonment.
fedecal Clean Aix Act, the Americans with NEEDS ASSESSMENT i
Disabilities Aa (ADA), and the Safe,
Accountable, Flexble, Efficient Aubum has many assets, which contribute to
Transportation Equity Act A Legary fot a welcoming pedesuian rnvironment, most
Usecs (SAFETF.A-Lin and its successors. notably a pedestrian-scaled downtown and an
Suppozting the non-motorized system helps extensive network of parks and msils. The
ensuce compliance with these initiatives and
Chaptn 3. Nnn MotonZed Tran.�portation Pa8°j'�
���F -=�"'� :• Comprehensive Transportation Plan
,.�--���,N�uv
needs assessment highlights these existing Commexcial development outside the
assets,and identifies improvement needs. downtown exists primarily along artexials and
is dominated by strip development and auto-
a . ,.� ;` oaented businesses. Although sidewalks azb
��' noss n�K � ". ✓ ptovided on most arterials, pedesuians may
�'� � �€,. n*`a� ° - feel exposed to tl�e tcaffic. Surface par�
r!z, � ' ;� '�r ,:. lots boider the sidewalks, and driveways
�Y: �,, � r;��� .e�„ interrupt the continuity of the sidewalk
�-� ` - system. The heavy volumes of veluculat
3 tiaffic and wide stxeets along azterials, such as
Aubum Way, pose a bamec foi pedesttians
walking along ox ciossing the xoadway. Two
� ' - _ pazriculaxly ptoblemadc locadons aze the
�1 midblock aossing between Dogwood Street
' • ` '. ` `: SE and Hemlock Street SE at Aubum Way
Crosswalk witfi Pedestrian Refuge Sourh,and 2G'� Sr�eec NE ac Aubum Way
3ro Street NW at Auburn Post O�ce No�
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ENVIItONMENT Sidewalk Inventory
As, a whole, Aubum's urban fabric in the A sidewalk inventory was conducted as part
downtown has temained intact and supports of the Plan update in 2005. A subsequent
a positive pedestian enviconment. inventory was conducted ia 2008 to collea
Businesses, shops, and single-family homes sidewalk data for the West Hill and Lea Hill
front streets with sidewalks and street tcees. azeas that annexed into the City m 2008. The
Howevex, ovez time suzface pazking lots have inventory identifies sidewallcs in the City, as
xeplaced some of these buildings, leaving shown in Figuce 3-1. The inventory aLso rates
laxge expanses of asphalt in portions of the �� condition. This inventoxy will help the
downtown. These enviuonments tend to Ciry identify pxoblem azeas aud piogzam.
discoutage walking. In addition, some of the y�pfovements accarding to prioritization
`oldec sections of sidewalks nced xepaix or guidelines, outlined lates in this chaptes. The
ieplacement. following pazagxaphs desmbe the snr6ey and
Since adoption of the 1997 Transportation Plan, other findings.
there have been impzovemmts to Main The older residential neighbo�oods tend to
Steeet, the B Stteet SE Plaza, and pedestian have sidewallcs on both sides of the steeet,but
improvemenu behind the shops on East they vazy widely in condition and
Main Street In addidon, the new Sounder constcuction standazds. Some xesidential
commutes rail stxrion and tsansit hub at West aceas, such as southwest I.ea Hill, wexe built
Main Street and C Street SW pxovide undet King County's jurisdiction and
pedesttians more options for connecting ro sidewalk construction was not zequixed.
regional destinatioas. These nnpzovements greaks in the sidewalk network tequire
contribute to a more hospitable envixonment pedestrians to maneuvet azound pazked cacs,
' for pedestrians. into private yazds, ox into rhe street. In newes
neighboxhoods such as LakeLwd Hills,
Chapter 3. Nan-MotoriZed Tranaportatian PQBe j-Z -
���F =�-�`'� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
1�U$U 'RI�T
�''°-� WASHINGTON
sidewalks built to cuaent standazds aze SE ad�acent to the school, tlashing fieacosss
ptovided on both sides of the street. on 17 Street SE and 21"Street SE, as well as
The sidewalk sucvey of the i.ea Hill and West new cxosswalks at several locations. Tliese
Hill anuexation ueas zeveaLs a sporadic and �Piovements wese made possible by a Safe
often disconnected sidewalk system. Sevezal Routes to School grant The City has also
of rhe newex xesidential developments have been steadily working on placing flashing
sidewalks, but many of the oldes iesidential beacons on Safe Wallring Routes fox public
azeas and arterial srteets aze missing lazge schools in Aubum. The flashing beacons
segments of sidewalk, xesulting in a poor �ve been funded ttuough a combination of
pedestrian envuonment g�t progcams and City zesources.
Trail Network Despite the piogzess that has been made oves
the past sevexal yeats, thete aze still azeas of
Aubuxn's developing tcail netwozk pmvides need. The following issues and needs were
local and cegional connections for identified to enhance and impiove the safery
xecrearional use, commuting and travel in foz school children in and azound the school
genexal. Cuaendy the oaly regional trails that safe walking azeas.
have been developed include the Intamcban ��deMldd/escncoi
and pozdons of the Gxeen Rivex and White �,
River Txails. The Lakeland Hills Tsail The csossing at M Street NE and 24 Street
pzovides residents in the neighborhood a NE experiences heavy txaffic. The Ciry aad
connecdon to Sunset Pack. Figuce 3-1 school distdct aze worldng to increase the
su**�ma,;�es the existing pedestxian iafra- safety of this cxossiug aeat the schooL
sccucture within rhe Aubum dcy limiu. o�cxseoaeee�m»wr�aryscnoo�
SCHOOL ACCESSIBILITY The "Rivet Bend" ox "Rivez Vie�' neigh-
borhood has ind'uect access to the school as
School safery is a majox concem for pazents, pedestrians musY exit the neighborhood to
students, the school districts, and the City �e east via Riveroiew Drive, the opposite
alike. The Aubum School District, wozking �ection of the schooL Furthemioxe, heavy
with an advisory committee, has established a velucular traffic on 22nd Street NE makes it
safe walking azea for. each elementazy and unsafe to ctoss M Street NE at that
middle school based on the pxesence of intcxsection. The School District is exploring
sidewalks, wallcing paths, and safe ways to improve access and make the
neighborhood stceets, as well as the neighborhood part of the school's safe
availabiliry of safe stzeet cxossings and the walking azea. One possible solution would be
tcaffic conditions in the succounding to obtain an easement and constxuct a
neighborhoods. All toutes within the safe pedestdan path from the neighboxhood ro
walking azeas ue designated as `Safe Routes 14�' Sueet NE. Pedestrian improvemenu are
to School'. Occasionally, individual schools �o aeeded along K Street NE from Hazvey
will notify pazents and students of preferred Road NE to 14"'Street NE.
walking xoutes cvithin each azea.
P/oneei Elemenbry Schoo/
Recendy, sevetal safety impzovements have K Street SE, located behind the school, has
been made to Safe WaAdng Routes Poor dxainage. During the zainy season, an
thtoughout Aubum. Olympic.Middle School �ea between the school building and the ioad
now has a non-motorized path on.H Street
Chafiter 3. Non-Motonti d Tran,porlakon � Pagt 3-3 .
CRYOF__'_..���-: Comprehensive Transportation .Plan .
�A-�BU�NRI�T
floods, blocking the school entrance with White River attend both Rivecside High
water. This azea is part of the designated safe School and Ilalko Elementary. The
walking azea, and the flooding ptohibits 50 to completion of a White Rivex/A Street SE
75 students from accessing theix pedest�ian ciossing would gteady benefit
wallcing zoute to and from school on rainy student at these two schools. Curready, the
�ys, closest toute to zeach these two schools
Teimina/PanYE/emenfarySchoc/ requires children to walk nor[h to
Thexe is a natuxal tendency foz lads to walk 41"/Ellingson Road.
from Teaninal Pazk Elementary to Holy
Eamily School and Olympic Middle School.
A pedesuian txail that connects these three
schools would pxovide a diiect route fox
pedestrians.
Evergreen Helghta E/ementary Schoo! _, > '
The azea azound Evexgreen Heights � =�
Elementary School; including S. 316`� Street,
56�'' Avenue S., and 51" Avenue S., has
incomplete pedestdan faciliries. In addiuon,
tesidents have noted that South 316th Street
needs impioved speed enfozcement. --� - -_ --- --
Safe Wa/king Route to School
Hazelwood Elementary Sehno!
Secdons of SE 304`" St�eet neaz Hazelwood
Elementazy School aze missing sidewalks.
LeaH//1 E/emenfarySchoo/ ACCESSIBLE ROUTES OF TRAVEL
There is a need foz sidewalks along 124th Ave T'he Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
SE aozth of SE 310th Stxeet, and along SE requixes that all new public, commeicial and
312th St ia viciaity of 124th Ave SE. institutional developmenu meet ADA
Morinfa/n:VlewH/gASchoo/ srandards. Furthermore, es;scing public
Thexe is'a need fot sidewalks along 124th Ave buildings, public outdoor facilities, and public
SE whese missing neaz school, especially nghts-of-way shall be rettofitted to aclveve
betweea SE 288th St and SE 304th St, and accessibiliry. An accessible route of txavel is
along 132nd Ave SE between SE 288th St designated to accommodate the needs of
and SE 299th St �y different people,. induding those who
aze blind,using wheelchairs,pushing a stroller
Auburn will continue to work with the or cart, ox injuzed. The law xequixes that.
Aubura School District, and othei school municipalities have a transitioa plan in place
districts within its limits and potential to address ADA issues. The City of.Aubum
annexation azeas to impiove school walk detaiLs the ADA design specifications in the
routes. . . Auburn Engineenug Design Standardr manuaL
Rlveis/de High Schoo/8//a/ko E/ementery
While they aze not within the Safe Walking
Route axeas, students on the noxth side of the
Chapta 3. Nan-MotoriZed Tronrportatiort PQBi j`E
e�TT�"('p-�*���� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
crn oe *��%�" - .
F�V;I:�V i�l�l
�--<' WASHINGTON
network, paxticulaxly ia neighbo=hoods
ADA Statulasds ��out a street grid system.
T7eeADAhasseaeraIrequiremerilstohelp FUTURE SYSTEM
aisure ease of access far all rwli-motorized �
aavefus,decluding those ir:wheelcJmi�s arul This section describes the City's vision foz the
mntorizeAscooters. Some of these futuxe pedestian system and ideutifies
requiremexts are as foliows. pzograms and initiatives that will enable it to
• Ia most cases,a minimum 3-foot wide achieve this vision.
cleaz zone must be pzovided along a
route with obstacles. D�DVNTOWN
• Railings should be between 34"and The downtown is historically the social heart
38". If children aze the prima=y usexs of the community, a place for people to
of a facility,a 2^d set of handrails,no interact It is consideced one of the pzimary
taller than 28",should be insralled pedestrian-oriented azeas in the City.
� Generally,grades along an accessible Important existing pedestrian dowatown
xoute walking path should not eaceed ]��s include connections from W Main
1:20 or 5%. Ramp slopes should not Street to the transit hub and commutes xail
exceed 1:12 ox 833%in new facilities. station, aad betwern W Main Street and the
• If a designated accessible route has a Aubum Regional Medical Center. The
gsade geam than 5%,it is considered Dowrrtown Plan, a special azea plan adopted in
a zamp and musc have haadrails and 2001 as part of the Cit�s Compnhenrive Pkrn,
�'d'I'�' anticipates high pedestrian oriented
Source:ADA and Architedural Bartiers Act developments in this axea, parcicularly around
(ABA)Guidelines, �ttp:/lwww.access-
boa v,2004.
"Note these standards change regulady end
should be confirmed betore applying them to a
site desian. ., 9
i
STI'E DESIGN
�
Pedestian conditions should be evaluated at �
the euliest stage of new development. The � � ,
zone between the development and the •M
public right-of-way needs to contabute to - -
pedestriw aetwozk wnnectivity and � �'" '
continuity. In addition to the public aght-of-
way, the iutexiox of the site ought to be '�_ ,�..•
examiued fot suitable pedestrian ciiculation. ' - ;:�
Whetever possible, walkways should be f� - --
placed along the most ditect routes to West Main Street, Downtown Auburn
connect buildings, pazking, bus stops, and
other amactions. In some cases,walking tsails �e Aubum Ttansit Centez. The Do�vntown
that link iesidenrial streeu to collectors or I'/an also ideatifies W Main Sueet, A Street
artexials can pxovide a moxe direct pedesrtian SW, Division Street, and the alley south of
connection than travel along the sidewalk M� Street as high priority pedestvan
coxridoss. In addidon, sevecal cecendy
Chapter 3. Nar-Molonl d Tmm portaliox Page 3-S
*
���F � �t Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�U� � _�7RN
� WASHINGTON
completed projects have helped 'unpxove signalized crossing. T'his dynamic is pactially
non-motorized access to the downtown and attributable to the locadon of bus stops in
transit station,including the West Main Stceet relation to employment centers. ,Hence;
Streetscape project, completed in 2007, and efforts should be made to locate bus stops"so
the. A Street SE Pedestian Impxovement commuteis aossing to the opposite side of'
pioject, designed to impxode ADA access the road aze d=opped off and picked up neac a
under the zailroad bridge just north of G�' sia ali�ed intecsection. Likewise, the City
Street SE and completed in 2009. should encourage majox exnplopers to:locate
A Downtown Circu]adon planning process is near tcansit toutes and stops. Fuct}ietmoxe,
also undexway. This effort will piovide pedeswan conuections from xesidential azeas
guidance for furthet enhancement of the to commercial comdois can be 'enhanced
pedesuian. and bicycling environment in �ough site design policies that encoucage
downtown Aubuxn. moze diTect non-motoxized connections to
majox xetail locarions. Fuhue planning along
The Sound Transit commutes rail station and commeccial coxridoxs should also include
transit hub have cseated demand foi new ameniues such as landscaping adjacent to the
mixed-use development, including retail and sidewalk, improved pedestrian crossings, and
living spaces. The Ciry is cominitted to enhanced bus stops at high uselocations.
fo�"'� new commexcial and residential
develbpmeat within walking distance of the ��ENT[AL NEIGHBORHOODS
tsansit hub and has been woiking on Investment in Aubum's neighbozhoods is an
paztriecslups to bring several mixed-use essential component of piovidiag a
developments to the downtown cote. These comprehensive and functional pedestrian
development pmvide an opportunity to netwoxk. As noted in the needs assessment,
establish . pedestrian friendly design, sidewalk conditions vary throughout the City.
stseetscape imptovemenis (including stteet This plan acknowledges the need to zetrofit
fumitute), and impioved sueet cxossings the pedestrian network in many azeas of the
along streets e�ctexiot to, and within the City and incozpor.tte pedestrian facilities into
devalopment. new development. Financial mechanisms to
In '6ides to aeate a foundadon for the help accomplish this goal aze desdi6ed later
antidpated downtowa zevitalization, it is vital � � �pt�'
to haye�. a. pedestrian network�that extends LEw HIi.L wND WEST HILL AREAS ' ,
beyond the d'owntown in place.
The I.ea Hill and West Hill areas wete
COIvIIvI6RCIAL CORRIDORS annexed into the Ciry of Aubum in 2008.
Aubum has several commercial coxridoxs, Because these azeas wete developed lazgely
mo"sf notably Anbum Way North and South, �des a county rucal' standatd, many of the
that aze ftequendy traveled by pedestrians. streets aze lacking pedestiian facilities,
While most of these axeas have sidewalks, tesulting in a disconnected pedestian system
rhere is the opportunity to enhance the �at has both., safety and quality of life
pedestrian envuonmeat Foi instance, xepexcussions. A sidewalk inventory was
pedesuian ccossing issues arise because. conducted in Lea Hill and West Hill in 2008
pedestrians ofren ccoss at unsignalized to identify gaps in rhe sidewalk network and
locations zather than walking to the neazest help the City prioritize. azeas fox tacgeted
Chafiter 3. Non MotartZed Tranrportatian Page 3-6
���F =�=�'� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
;-s'A-�:CT�1CT
WASHINGTON
�inoestment. Refez to� Figuce� 3-1 to view AUBURiV.PARKS,AECREATIO[V&OPEN SPACE �.
existing sidewalks. P[,A[v 2005 .
HIGH PRIORITY PEDFS'IRIAN CORRIDORS The Aubum Pazks, Recxeation& Opeu Space
Figure 3-2 identifies High Prioxity Pedestrian P� ���es specific pxojects for the
Corridozs that aze curtendy lacking a development of local and zegional trails. The
complete sidewalk system. Some of the Aubum-Pacific rrail will piovide a multi-use
comdoxs have sidewalks on oae side oz foc Path that impxoves access fiom the White
portions of the cosridor. Othexs aze missing �ver to downtown. A planned pedestrian
sidewalks altogethex. ccossing, under the BNSF railcoad mrcks jusr
nor[h of the Wlvte Rives Bridge,will improve
These High Priority Pedestrian Comdors the tegional ttail system by p=oviding a
wexe selected based on the following criteria: connection to the Ciry of Pacific.
pedestriaa volumes; proximity to schools,
pazks, trensit routes and commeccial azeas; Fundiag is still needed for the White Rives
and whexe missing gaps can be completed. Trail connecdon to A Street SE and the north
Aubum section of the Gxe� Rivex Trail.
The High Pxiority Pedestrian Corridoxs aze Private development may help fund a porrion
roadway comdoxs where the City intends to of the two-mile segment of the Gzeen Rivez
target investrnent in pedesuian facilities. The T�,
City's cuixent half street policy xequires
sidewalk to be installed by developers Planning efforts ue also focused on the Mill'
whenevex signiificant improvements aze made Cteek Corridot/Auburn Environmeatal Pazk
to a pioperty. T'his has pLOVen to be an �d southeast traiLs. This pazk pzoject will
effective means of building out the sidewalk �ffoduce zesidents to the eeosystem along
network. Howevex, it is a slow pzocess �e cxeek. More detail on all of these efforts
because it zelies on new development oi � be found in the TraiLs chaptes of the
redevelopment ro occuc,malang it difficult to P�.Recreation and Open Space P]an.
complete whole corridozs. By ptogxamtning __
specific pedestrian cocridots fox investment,
the City can levezage grant dollars and othes
resources to more sisategically complete gaps
in key pedestrian corridors.
The High Priority Pedestrian Conidois
identified in Figure 3-2 should be zeviewed _•�,; �_
tegulazly fot indusion in the Ciry's Si4-Yeaz ,, ,
_. n ,����,* „ .
' Y
Tzanspoxtation Impiovement Psogram and � ��,��`�^ ?�s�r" '� + rt �j=�5,
foi gxant funding opportunities. �j-y,,�z,pP�f'j"�������„�
fNJiti v..�° �L_ ZL_1�..f..s..�..a L._..knR_ .
Aubum Mu/GUse Trail
An importa.nt component of Aubum's trail
system iududes trailheads. Tzailheads should
be inviting to usets and pxovide amenities
such as pazking, bicycle racks, information
CbaPter 3. Non-Motmi�xd Tmntponation I'a8e j'� .
.
* ' Comprehensive Transportation Plan
1�UBV"�
a`
� - ='� WASHINGTON
kiosks, restcoom facilities, wates fountains,
tresh receptacles, and seating facilities. Sidewalks wiU 6e priorirized:
Ttailheads should be constructed and • Where hazardous condirions are
impxoved as Auburn's trail system fiirther pxesent;
develops. See Figiue 3-4 fot existing and • On school walk routes;
pxoposed trails and ttailhead locadons. . �Uhue e�ctensive improvements aze
FUNDING MECHANTSMS needed in a single neighborhood;
Sidewalk Improvement Program ' ��ng scceecs winc�urb and guttex;
• Along Downtown pedesuian
The City of Aubum developed the Sidewalk corridoxs;
Imptovement Pxogtam in 2004 to zepait . �ere curb ramps aze missin�and
existing sidewalks and complete missing links . �ere they will complete a missing
in the sidewalk netwoxk. These funds aze ��a pedesrtian network.
essential foz pzomoting non-motorized travel
and can be used to levetage othes funding ' �ere property ownexs are willing to
soucces such as state and fedexal ants. �'ancially partidpate in the
� � construction of sidewalk
Aubum has identified thzee principal azeas in i�npcovements rhrough an LID.
which sidewalk improvements should be
prioritized: coxridoxs that provide access to walking xoutes to schools oz aze neaz essential
and within the downtosm, school zaaes, public facilities. Projects undex this pxogtazu
and patics. Additional critecia for priority �y �o include enhanced pedestian and
access improvement could include, but aze birycle facilities on or near zoadways undet
not limited to, axeas with high concentrations repau.
of senior citizens or disabled citizens, azeas
with high volumes of pedestrian-txansit °�erial Streeta"Program
intcxactioa, aad azeas whexe pxopeny owners With the success of the "Save Our Streets"
are willing to financially participate in the Pcogzam for cesidenrial streets, the Ciry is
construction of sidewalk impsovements xeviewing the potential of implemrnting a
thzough a local impxovement district(I.ID). similaz piogzam foi atterial streets. Pedestrian
The selection of futuze sidewalk �enides and safety improvements would be
impxovements xelies on a hiexarchy of ��uded in tnany of the arterial unpxovement
exisring conditions. The call-out box lists plojects funded by such a ptogtam.
some key conditions that will be considexed
when prioritizing pzojects. Local Improvement Districts
Local Imptovement Distdcts (LID) enable
"Save Onr Streets"Program city investment in a specified azea by
In November 2004, Aubum residents levezaging city funds with contdbudons fcom
appzoved Proposition 1, "Save Out Street" pxoperty ownets in the district LID's use
Progrnm, which aeates a dedicated local �ted city resouxces to impzove
stceet fund T'his money will be set aside foi neighborhood qualiry and can be used to
zepair and maiatenance of local zoadways. In �ance new sidewalks.
addition, prioriry will be given to improving
street cxossings that aze 'identified as safe
Cbaprer 3. Nair Motorixed Traarponarion Page 3-8
���F =-�f"- * • Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� �_ _ ` °�
�" �-� WASHINGTON
SAFETY EDUCAT[ON AND ENFORCEMENT commute cyclists, in additioa to xecreatioual
Awazeness of pedestrian safety issues should ����
be pxomoted tl�xough educational ptogcams NEEDS ASSESSMENT
and enforcemenr efforts. This �combination EXISTIIVG�CONDTT'IONS
helps reinforce key safety issues such as safe
pedestrian cxossings and speeding., The Ciry The topogtaphy in many parts of Aubum is.
will proactively work to idendfy pxoblem Elat and conducive to cycling fox a zange of
azeas and issues. The following list coatains skill levels. Areas along the Gxeen and White
examples of some techniques, that can be Riveis pzovide xecreational oppottunities for
employed in these efforts. multi-use meils thar support bicyclists,
■ Establishing non-motorized uavd pedestrians and equestrians. The Interuxban
infosmarion kiosks at key City desrinations Tiail is part'of a majoz north-south zegional
(e.g.Main Stxeet,Supermall,Emerald Downs, trail system. The C'neen River trail is also an
�5�, extension of a north-south iegional rtail.
• Displaying educational infoxmadon in Ciry Therefote, Aubum has a good netwoik of
publicaaons,on the website,and on TV. e�asting oz planned north-south re¢eational
■ Developing wayfinding signage to direct �• However, these aze few existing cross-
pedesuiaus and(iiryclisu. town connections and new connections onto
■ Pazmering with the School District to teach �e West Hill and Lea Hill aze needed
childxen safe wall�ng and bilang behaviors. Rearational and commutes cqclists travel
• Launching public informadon caxnpaigns for along the Interucban Txail to azeas north and
problanatirlocations and pazmering with the south'of.Auburn. Cyclists also frequeatly ride
Police Depznmmt ro provide enforcemmt along S 277`" to rhe east side of Greea River
■ Incceasing driver awazeness oEvehicle speeds Road, and down along the Crzeen River to 8'�
through the pxesence of radaz speed signs and Street NE, oz down R Stteet NE io SE
photo enforcemmt in school zones. Aubum Black Diamond Road SE Aubum
• Enforcing pedestriau,biryclist,and diiver Black Diamond Road and SE Cueen.Valley
inEcactions,and posdng signage to reinfoxce Road aze popular zoutes for accessing ateas
this prioriry. east of Aubum. However, these roads are
3.2 Bicycle Travel ���ed by dangerous cycling conditions
and are not suitable foc ine�cperienced ryclists.
Biryde facilities ue an important component Also, ,once in Aubllm, there is no clear
of Aubum's rtansportation and recreational dicection for teaveling within aad thxough tke
infrastrucnue. Bicycling provides a clean, Ciry.
non-motorized form of uxnsportarioa and gicgcle .lanes aze extcemely limited on dty
allows citizens to maintaiu a healthy lifestyle. �erials and collectozs, making it difficult
It also helps imptove rtaffic congestion and both for tegional and local'ridess to navigate
aiz quality by providing an altemative to foi any ieasonable distance through rhe City.
driving. Inaeasingly, bicycle commuting is I,united birycle stotage is also a kilndxance ro
becoiT]1Rp a moxe populax altemative, aud the ��y�; -Figute 3-3 identifies existing'rtails
City must take steps to provide; a moie �d bike lanes ia the City.
fiincdonal and attractive network for
Chapter 3. Nox Motori�ed Tma.por[abon PaBe j-9
���F -=-�''��--�°� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.�� ���
�-�� WASHINGTON
AUBURN BICYCLE TASK FORCE including ma��n of b�cle faciliries and �
identification of bi5ycle related proiects and
In Ma=ch 2010: Ma�ot Peterl.ewis foaned o�orities•
the Ci of Aulium Bic�cle Task Foxce
Nl�var L.�wis intended diat tHe Bicycle Task On November 29 2010 the Task Force's
�'�ce would furtfie= develo„� and te5ne tecommendarions were presented at an
�_��v_� Aubum City Council Committee of the
develo the i s eoals and olicies for its
bicycle transpor[ation s,ystem The Task �X�ole meetin� The Ta�k Foxce greaented
Foxce was comprised of a btoad cxoss both short-tenn and long-tenn
section of communit� members and recoaunendarions consisting of:
�interecrPd parties that were charg�d to Short-Term Recommendations:
develo� iecommendations on bicycle �_ iiae Sharrows�/Shaze The Road signage
faciliaes issues and o�goxtunities centezed on in residential and some non-iesidential
the following three�rincigles: areas of Citv.
2 Im�ement a �ilot ,progcazn conce,gt for
Connections—As an example how do Shaaows/Shaze rhe Road consisting of•
bicycle riders get fiom the north end to �e
south end of the Citv ox from Lakeland to a. 18-24 month�rogram period
Z.ea Hill? • b. Pre-established}�etforrnance
measutements
Recreation Onnottuuities—As an examnle c. Pze-established reporting gxotocols
how does the City further build and capitalize
on a bicycle netwoik to su$port and enhance d. Future�olicy consideration
the reczeation options fox its citizens? o�nortunity for Ciry Council
3 Continue installation of bike lanes in gatits
EcoaomicDevelonment—As an examgle_ of Cit�where thexe is existing/a�d �uate
how does the City,�italize on the ri�Qht-of-wa�,
Interurban Trail as a cbnduit of customers for 4. Develog Auburn specific bicycle s' age
existing and new businesses? proex�m to highliQht comdors
connectors and in-city/our of dtv
destinations.
The Bicvcle Task Force was comnrised of
twelve individuals glus te�zesentadves from
Aubuxn School District Green Rivec
Coxnmunity College and Cascade Bicy.de �
Sharrows also known as shared lane markin_gs,are
Glub that we*e inpited to be �art of Task on-street le�ends that reinforce the existing rules of
Fozce The Task Force met a total of 14 times the road.They are not separate bike lanes:a mororist
bettveeu Aoril 2010 and -November 2010 can s6I1 drive over the shaaows.Mororists should
inclu�ng ai tluee hout coYiimunit� tot� on expect to see and share the lane with bicyclists.
' Sahi t�lv 24 2010 and a �int meeting Sharrows indicate to bicyclists the best place to riile
w�th Aubum Touxism Boazd and Aubum �*'the lane.Sharrows are typicall�used in locations
where the madway width is not ade uc�ate to provide
Downtotvn Aseociation on Au�ust 1 Z 2010 dedicated bike facilities or on downhill lanes where
The Cnmmittee worked on a varietv of issues bicvclisfs mi�ht lravel a similar speed as motor
� vehicles.
Chapter3. Non-MatorixedTran.�porlation � Page3-10
���F =-�'`- :� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�����
����� WASHWGTON �
5 Make itnorovemenu to existing ° a ;�he Aubum Downtown Association
Inten�rban Tsail — sig�ao�,e pavement � A»h>?cn Touri�m Boazd to develo�
' condirions veeetation ma;ntenance: gxade bncinP�a cnr�nort for bic�cle riders/create
crossings,,�nc�ugeradec to user facilities bike-friend�businesses.
ar Ma?nStreet crossing. ■ ieate the��gtion of Aubutn as
Long-Term Recommendatione• `Bicy� (�i y of South Kin.�Countd' .
1 Develo� catiital �rovement rn oeram n Use social media to advertise Auburn as
�aec+ with cost estimate fox-desi it and_ bicv�le frien�communitv
con�truction of bicvcle/nedeatrian bridQe
ar southem tecminus of M St. west of ° Connect with dfferent tyges of bicade
nroan;>arions about bicycling
exis •tLg Stuck River Vel�ide Bridge �
on,nortunities in Auburn
2 Develog cavital im�rovement groe�am
F�qject with cost estimate fot desiPn and ° Establish an atLnual bike event in Aubum
�onstruction of innovative and safe similar o Redmond Criterium and
pede�trian/bicycle ctossing at M EnutncLzw D�s that offex bike awareness
4r /A, h„m Wgy, South intecsection. and other events such as rime tdals, road'
rarec 2nd mui_tig1_e te=±a±*+ xacing,
3 InsL one oz moie bike boxes2 through
`�'1Lnt �roeram" ag�groach to test • Develog an annual xoad xace on Aubum
effecriveness and gublic xesvonse — street� — wo�k with gromoters to have
� �aible locations West Main Stceet/C diffetenr levels of road racin�t�ggeal to
SrrePrinrPr�rction. M Stxeet/Aubum Way +*+^ ��1�4y.ges of ridexs.
S�urh intersection Ellingson Rd/A Street o Estalilish tie ins with bi�¢cle xaci�g events
intetsection. at Pacific ltaceway_Jilce wee �terium
4 Install bicy�le/pgdestrian crossing races mountain biking�nd C ocross
w�rnll�stems alogg In n *ban Txa+1 at FollowinPthe�resentation of its
a 1 oc ing]ocarions —277`". 37`�` St. I�?�1: xecommendations to the Auburn Citv
West Main St. and 15�' St. SW. �'ouncil, the Aubum Bicys.le Task Force has
5 Develq� an official Aubum Bike Mav contL.+ued to meet and wozk with C�},y staff
r ��1'r ., rhe Bicacle Task Force nxesrnted a°d the C�of Auburn Tra�ortation.Trails
and Transit C'ors�m�ttee to furthes zefine and
h i Council with bi c e oriented -
�e C tr �X-� devel_o�its recommendations
economic develQpment secommendadons ,.
�y�� - BICYCLE FACILITY CLASSIFICATION
■ Develgg �e Aubum Sounder Station as 'I'he punerican Association of State Highway
"¢tartino n�int" for bike club rides� Tianspoitarion Officials (AASHTO) has
developed classifications for bicycle faciliues
and parking. Bicyde classification is based on
�Bike Boxes are a taffic contro]device at si lized �e desigxl and exclusiveness of use.
intersections that reciuire motorists m srop a short Class I multi-use [tails that allow blcycles
dismnce before the crosswalk and allow bicyclists to � '
stou in the area behveen the cazs and the crosswalk. lnclude the Interuxban, QUbite Rivei; ancl
Bicvcle boxes give bicyclists nriority bv allowing Gxeen Rivex Txails. Some Class II blcycle
them ro go m the head of the line �atles aze located at
Chapter 3. Nart Molontied Tron po#atian P°8°j-»
���F "-�=' . :; Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Au�ui�v
�.�`"� � � WASHINGTON
• S 277th Stxee;between the West Valley Hary
and B Stceet NW; Bicycle Facility CTassificatiore
• 22nd Srteet NE between I and M Streets NE; • Sepazate Fatility(Class n—A non-
• 12th and 17th Street SE between A Street SE motoazed facility,paved oc unpaved,
and Aubum Way, that is physically sepazated from
• S 21st Sneet SE between A Street SE and R motoazed vehiculaz teaffic by an oprn
Street SE; space or bamer. It is sometimes refened
29th Street SE/Rivenvalk Drive SE between to as a Biryde Path,Biko Txail,Noa-
' motozized Tcail,Multi-puxpose Trail or
A St. SE and 28ch St.SE;and some combination thereof.
` Tarace Drive. • Bike Lane(Class In—A portion of a
Bike pazkiag facilities axe classified by length coadway that is designated by srriping,
of use: long texm, medium tExm, and short signing,and pavemmt mazkiugs for
tean. The longex bikes aze to be stozed, the pLefecential or eadusive use of biryclisu.
Typically these lanes are located outside
more dutable the facility's design must be. of the ve6icle travel lane.
Bike stozage facilities aze located at only a few • Bike Route(Class IIn—A segment of
locations throughout the City. These include road designated by the jurisdicdon with
the trattsit centex, which ptovides 12 bike appmpriate dicectional and infoxmational
rack spaces and eight spots in the lockers. mackers,but without striping,signing and
pavement matkings for the pxefuential
Table 3-1 lists existing birycle facilities;Figuce o=���ive use of biryclists.
3-3 identifies facility locations. • Bike Friendly(Class I�—A xoadway not
designated by dicectional and
informational markas,shiping,signing,
or pavement mackings fox the
preferential or exclusive use of biryclists,
but containing appcopriate biryde-
friendly design standazds such as wide
cuxb lanes and bicycle safe drain giates.
Source: Engineering Design Standards Manual,
City of Aubum
Table 3-1 Existing Bicycle FacilfUes �'ROVEMENT NEEDS
Cyclists desize safe xoutes that make
�' � connections thtoughout the City and to
xegional points of inte=ests. The exisring
Hard-surFaceTrail &�d��' 28.5 miies facilitles fa�l short of Cieating a bicyde
Pedestrians
network in Auburn. They aze isolated from
EquesMans
Sofhsurface Trail Off•road CydisYs 2.17 miles one anothet. If �fam+l+a* �� �e terrain
Pedestr�tans and/or unskilled, ryclists may find it difficult
On-street Bike Lane sicycuses �miies to bike thxough Aubum.
Chafiter 3. Nan-Moton�,ed Trantportation Page 3-12
��oF '-s�'-=�=:� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
s—����
9 °WASHINGTON
The City plans to build out the birycle The Aubum Birycle Task Fotce wotkinQ with
netwozk and ptovide bettex � east-west aff regresentatives from che Citv Public
connections. Upgxading bicycle facilities on \Ylorks Degna,mnent identified and inventoried
dty streets is an important component of this � �Pries of bicycle fadlity nng�ovements:
P]yn ThPCe ±tnornvementc and a�cociated issues
Aubutn shall make gteatex efforts in the and oggortunities ue�resented in Table 3-2.
futuce to encourage bicycle use, particulaxly ��'"�y�e Facilities Inventorv.
foz commuting pucposes, as a form of � V",i y; ' � ":���� y;
transportation demand mauagemen; (I'DIv�. - •"
One mechanism of doing so is to encoutage � 1 '
majoi esnployecs to locate neaz traiLs and =
bicyde routes, and to provide facilides ,.: g:.;� �A"1 `;;='
` , .+v�..'
condudve to bicycling to work. Also, the � ' �R.� ' �
.�..,_.
City needs to take a more agg�essive xole in � " �„ �.✓. '
ptog,eamming implementation of the funue �,�`;rt }'"�
bicycle netwozk identified in this chaptes, • r * �
ensuring that eventually all residents of and �I
employees in Aubuxn feel corimforcable
commuring on bike. In addirion,.Aubum Tlie Work is Easier when Shared .
should seek oufleu, including the Cit�s
website, to piovide up-to-date infonnation on F U T U RE T RAV E L
bicycling options within the Ciry and to �e funiue bicyde netwoxk includes coxridoxs •
cegional destinations. for reg•iona� recreationa,� and cross-town
The Commute Trip Reductioa (CTR) conaections. The zegional coaidois will
pmgcam pzovides a foraial mechanism foi provide connections to the Valley.
encouraging these practices and is required by communities as well other azeas of King and .
state law foz employess with 100 or moze Piesce Counties. I.ocal biking gcoups 'have
employees azriving at a single location during identified the Intesucban Txail and Cmen
the AM peak. Aubum's CTR pxogtam calls Rives Trail as unportant xegional connections.
out bicycle storage facilities,lockeis, changing Othex p]anned tegional connections will link.
azeas, and showezs as measuces employecs Aubum to amactions azovnd the Puset
can take ro meet CTR goals. Iss additioa, Sound Region iaduding Mount Rainet, the
Aubum can use the SEPA pxocess to Port ofTacoma, and the Ciries of Seattle-and
encouxage development of these facilities at Woodinville.
the time of aew development or tenant �e Crieen and White River corradors are
impxovements. multi-functional, pzoviding recxeational
The Doumtown Plan also discusses the need for opportunities fox regional and local bicycle
improving bicycle facilities in the azea. On- ttips. 'Thexefote, the City has prioritized the
stceet biryde facilities will be sought in cofnpletion of both these trail systems. Also,
association with planned' xoadway Aubum will seek to enhance portions of City
impxovements. In addition, the City should uail systems whenevex possible, by pxoviding
investigate pzoviding birycle stozage. and amenides foi non-motorized ttavelers such as
othex amenities on city owned pxoperries. rest azeas, as well as safety improvements I
Cbapter 3. Nan•MotortZtd Tranrpwtakon P°8�3'13
��TM�F =���� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
.tt�U�_�`�N
""�—� WASHINGTON
including warning signage and gxade South--15w Street NW,Tenace Drive
separated trails. Additional cross-town NW West Hill,Federal Way via Peaslev
connections that complete the bicycle Canvon or Movntain View Drive,
netwoxk will consist of local trails and on- Interurban Trail
zoad facilities linking Aubum's F Street/[,es Gove Coaidor-East Main
neighbothoods. Street to Les Govell2m Street SE
The birycle xoutes identified fox futute North- downtown Aubum,
development link to existing multi-use mrils Main Street connector
and liike lanes. The R Stceet coaidoi from �uth-Les Gove Communiiv
Aubum Black Diamond Road to 12`� Street Cympus,South End M Street
SW will provide a north-south connection corridor
betwaen the Temunal Pazk neighborhood p�g Street Corridor-37�Street NW to
and othet future birycle lanes linking to the Main Street
downtown and North Aubum. A futuie
connection betcdeen Aubum Black Diamond North-North end businesses/indus�ial
Road and Aubum Way S is also pioposed parks,Interurban Trail,Kent
The futuze Bonneville Powex Trail will be a South-Downtown Auburn,Auburn
sepazated, hazd surfaced rtail czossing the I.ea Re�ional Medical Center,City Services,
Hill azea and connecting to the Intenuban Main Street connector
Tzail and West Hill via on-stxeet birycle R Street NE/I Street NE Corridor-Main
facilities. Niunerous othei on-street birycle Street to 37�h Street NE
faciliries and txails aze ,planned. They axe all North-Lea Hill,North Auburn
identified in Figuce 3-4, found at the end of communiiies,Brandon Pazk,Green River
rhis chaptei. Communi College,other
The Aub�**� Biiycle Task Force idrntified a connectors/comdors
future birycle system based on the conce$ts South-Downtown Auburn,south end'
of corridors and cocLnectors. The Bicycle Aubum.Lea Hill,North Auburn
Task Foxce defines comdots as:north/south communities,Brandon Pazk,Green River
bicycle facilities and connectoxs as east/west Community College;other
bicycle facilities ' Tliese corridors and connectors/corridors
connectois aze iden�ed in Fivuxe 3-5 found C Street Trail-15�Street SW Corridor:-
2+ Le end of this chaptet The Bicycle Task Ellinp�san Road to 15+b Slreet SW at
Fnrce' comdozs and connedors aze intended �terurban Trail
to gxomote cxoss town and regional travel
and connections as sneci5ed below• North-Interurban Trail connection,
` YMCA,SuperMall, �ona,Pacific,
Gorridors: Tacoma,Seattle,Kent
West Valley Corridor-29�Street NW to South-A Street SE-Lakeland Hills
Peasley Canyon Rd S Corridor,Lakeland Hills community,Soutfi
North-15�Street NW,Terrace Drive N4V, Auburn
West Hill Federal Wa�via Peaslev Canyon South End M Street Corridor-E Main
or Mountain View Drive,Emerald Downs, Street down M Street to 3'7�Street SE fo
Interurban Trail Ellingsan Rd SW
Chaptm3. NonMotarigrdTranrportatian PaBej-�4
��F '-�"=�:�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
����' °�
�/"�-��-� WASHINGTON �
South-Les Gove Pazk,Game Farm Pazk, Connectors:
other connectors to South Aubum gtewart/La�ce Tavns Connector-Stewart
comxnunities Road to Lake Tapps Parkway to 182^d ,
North-Game Farm Park,Les Gove Park, East-Lalceland Hills.Lakeland Hills Town
Downtown Aubum Center Sumner Bonn�Lake,Kersey Wav
Kersey Way SE Corridor-M Street/33�d West-Lakeland Town Center,Pacific,
up Keraey Wav to Randall Ave SE up to 9+� Sumner Algona,EdQewood,Tacoma
S�� RiverwalldAubum Way SouttJEnumclaw
South-Bonnev Lake,Sumner,East Lake Connector-29�/M Street up Riverwalk to
Tap_ps Buckle�connecLin�withStewart Dogwood out Au6nm Way South
Road Connector East-Muckleshoot Indian Reservation,
North-Game Farm Pazk.South End M Game Farm Park.White River
Street Corridor powntown Auburn.Les Amphitheater,Academy,Enumclaw
Gove Pazk West-South end Aubum communities,M
A Street SE-Lakeland Hills Corridor - Street corridor.Mucklesfioot Indian
Ellingson Rd SW to Lake Tapps Pazkwav Reservation Game Fazm Pazk,downtown
SE Aubum.
North-Roegner Pazk,Lakeland Hills Main Street Connector-R Street to West
communitv V�
South-Roegner Pazk,Lakeland Hills West-Downtown Aubum,Interurban
community Stewart/I.a1ce Tapps Parkway Trail Soiinder Station,City Services;
Connector Aubum Bnvironmental Pazk,Aubum
Green River Road Comdor-8�Street NE ReQional Medical Center,Federal Wav,
to 104�Avenue NE out Green River Road West Hill
to 277� East-Downtown Aubum,Interurban Trail,.
North-Auburn Golf Course,Mary OLson Sounder Staiion Citv Services,Aubum
Farm,Kent,Green River Environmental Pazk,Auburn Regional
Soutli-Auburn Golf Course,Mary Olson Medical Center Lea Hill,Green River
Fazm Green River,Lssac Tacobs Park; Communitv Colle¢e,Black Diamond .
Downtown Aubum,other North 3'7�Street/West Hill Connector.-I
connectors/corridors Streef to 51�Street
124�h SE Corridor-GRCC to North Citv East-North Aubum businesses,
Limits Interurban Trail,West Hill.Emerald
North-Kent Downs Kent North Auburn communities,
South-Green River Communiiy College West-North Aubum businesses,
Interurban Trail,West Hill,Federal Wav
Lea Hill Connector- R Street up Lea Hill
to Hwy 18
East-Green River Community College,
Lea Hill Padfic Race WaXs,Kent,Maple
Valley�Covington
Chaprer3. Non-MotoriZedTmn.por[otioa Page3-15
�m�F -*-�`"�°`'; Comprehensive Transportation Plan
1�= �V'�
� ,.�--�'� WASH[NGTON
West-Downtown Aubum Aubum citizens have a long history of
North 37�Street/lNest Hill Connector-I supporting the planniug and development of'
Street to 51�Street equestrian facilities. The Ciry intends to
East-North Aubum businesses, ��ease its network of sofr-sucface, muld-use
Interurban Trail,WesYHill,Emerald � � more ruxal locadons with.appropriate
Downs,Kent,North Auburn communities facilities suitable foz equestrian use. .
West-NorthAubumbusinesses NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Interuiban Trail,West Hill,Federal Wav EX[STttvc CotvDTT[oNs
R Street SFJAuburn Black Diamond Road Auburn's equestrian trail system is quite
Connector-East Main to East City Limits �ted. The Pazks Deparanwt cuczendy
East-Flaating Geiser State Park;Green �ages a two-mile, soft-surface txail, along
Valley Road,Black Diamond the White Riv� at Roegnes and Game Fazm
West=Downtown Auburn Wildemess Pazks. Otheiwise, these aze no
fom�al equestian trails in Aubum.
The selecdon of 6ike faciliry pzojects will be Hoxse owners,do have informal access to the
based upon safety, ioute continuity and soft-surface path adjacent to the Interutban .
connectiviry issues. In addition to new bicycle t*azl, as well as lazge open spaces in the runl
comdois, spot safery impxovements aze an azea just south of the White Rives and east of
important component of the. Cit}�s futuze Keisey Way in southeast Aubuxn. To ieach
birycle uetwork. Impiovements aze needed �e open azeas, many ride�along the edge of
at 15�' Stceet SW and the Intecucban Txail and =oads such as 53 and 56 Srseets SE:These
C Stceet SW.and Ellingson. In addidon, safe aze nacrow roads with gxavel shouldexs:
access to downtown Aubum and onto West Dcainage swales run pazallel to many portions
Hill and Lea Hill aze a priority fox the City. of these coads,"and while conditions vazy,
typically there is a narrow unpaved shouldu
Typical birycle xoute impiovements along a oz grassed azea alongside tfie road whese
Class I facility indude pu=chasing the righc- hoises can walk.
of-way, des!a ing the txail, :and consizucting
Ithe txail and txailhead. Fox a Class II pathway, Table 3-�Existing Equestrian Fadlities
impiovements include saiping lanes,
insrall�wazning aad ditectional signage, and ., .
painting bike.symbols on the pavement.
As this plan is updated in the future, 5�ft_ Equ�trians
emphasis should continue to be placed on surface Off-road Cyclists 2.17 mlles ' 2 miles±
developing a safe and convenient birycling Traif Pedestrians
enviconment for both zecxeational and
commutet ryclisu of all experience leveLs.
3.3 Equestrian Travel
Chapter3. Na�t-MotorzZedTran.rparlakon Page3-16
��F �-* • Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�: ���J�rv
�---sy6 WASHINGTON
Ilv�xovet�rv�rNEEDS FUTURE SYSTEM
The lack of equestrian uxil miles in the Ciry The southeasr Aubum azea, south of the
and connectiviry to `tegional equestrian White (Stuck) Rives and east of Kersey Way,
faciliries aze two aieas thaf need should be designated as an Equestian
improvement As indicated by Table 3-3, District Futuze development in this area
these aze curtendy two-miles of fomial should be consistent with that designation.
equestrian tcails in the City. Tlus is a bazriex Southeast Aubum is pazticulazly suitable as
to most equestcians, particularly those an Eyiiesuian Distdct because it contains a
bringlag hozses via tc�iles. In. ordes to City watesshed, shoze]ines of statewide
become a moze equestrian friendly significance; and numexous critical azeas.
commuairy,Aubum must undeztake.planning Equestrian ttails may be situated neaz some
initiatives to espand the cuuenr network and of these featutes; whereas moze intense
link to tegional tcails. development may be unsuitable. Equestrian
Auburn, as a xegionally designated Uxban � �9�o be appzopxiate fox paxts of Lea
Centex, is becoming incceasingly utbanized. �. �d should be evaluated as rhe azea
As the City coatinues to utbanize, it will seek ��es into the Ciry. When locadng
oppoxhuuties to iaclude, equestian p ^ino- equestian trails along iucal roads, it may be
in its iafrastructure imp=ovemeats. Special aPP=opriate to **+��+**+;�e ixail potential by
considention for equestrian fac.ilities should constructing a wider shoulder able to
be given to southeast Aubum and the Lea accommodate equestrian travel on one side of
Hill potential annexation azea as both have �e road.
existing equesttian communities. Membess of the equestrian communiry in
Loop trail development is one suategy that Aubum:have emphasized the desue foz a txail
can be anployed to increase tlie length of connection between Roegnes Pazk and
equestrian uails in Aubum. Loop rrails can southeasr Aubum. One potential alignment
be lissked to eaosting ]inear facilities, thereby Would be along a �oute xoughly pazallel_ to
incxeasing netwoxk miles. Keisey Way and 53 Street SE. The Pazks
Plan identifies this futiue trail u the Williatns
Oppoctunities to expand the equeslxian trail Z'�], po��obstacles include critical azea
system should be consideced in.all funue impacts and righ[-of-way acquisition. The
infrastructute plaaiung and development. topog=aphy aloag Kexsey Way indudes steep
Featiires such as busy axterial streets, steep ]��s and large dxainage swales. As trail
slopes and naaow bridges aze baaiess. to P�nning pzogresses to a more detailed level, ,
equesuian rtaoel. Hence, eqyestrian trail othet aligntnents should be evaluated.
planning should go hand ia hand with othex
planning acrivities the City is undertaking. The equestrian zoutes identified foz funue
When Planning equestian uails, othex development aze concentrated along the
facilities such as trailer parlQng and di=ectional �te Rivex, the Green River, and in the
sa a°e must be accommodated. pxoperties in southeast Aubum that aze
owned by public and semi-public
oxgaaizations, These ioutes aze identified as
soft-surface, multi-use txails rhat aze suitable
for riding and walking. Consisuction costs
and the extent of clearing needed aze much
Chapta3. Non-Matod�dTranrportatian p°Be3"��
���F =�"'"-�°.=;` Comprehensive Transportation .Plan
Au���v
�� WASHINGTON �
less fot soft-sutface tcaiLs than for paved addition of the BNSF uudesccossiag, just
trails. Some of the soft-surface trails aze north of the White Rivex and west of A Stceet
ptoposed xo occur in conjunction with a SE, will pxovide safe passage fox pedesuians.
paved. teail. S»**+**+a�es of ttaiLs that aze A new trail connection along C Street SW ivill
appmpriate foz equestrian use aze listed in proviiie pedestrians and cyclisu with a safet
Table 3-3. Design specifications for connection to downtown and the Tiansit
equestrian tsaiLs will be incorpoxated into the Center.
fluburn Engrireerixg Derigx Standardr manuaL
3.4 Future Noaa-
snotorozed Systena ' �
Aubum's futuce non-motorized system I
' consisu of an interconnected netwozk of �'G a ' �'
� Whde River Tra+l '
sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use trails, and f�. �
equestian paths. The list of pxoposed "� � '"ppetloe0ap"°°°`�`= _' °�
pzojects in Table 3-3 is developed fox �` t-_rt„ .y ��s,��^ ' "'�"""`ss "��
��, t,'r�dv"'°��M a. . � .
P��S P"rPoses. Figuce 3-4 identifies the �, �.,i�,......:�.»,:.i.�.y..:....`'.... ::.
location .of the Ixail projects identified in White River Trail
Table 3-3 and maps the futuce trail and
birycle network. Multi-Use Path
This network will provide regional, 1'KOMOTING HEALTHY COMMTJNITiES
xecreational and cirycvide connections foz a '�e Ciry of Aubum envisions a
variety of non-motorized modes. The �sportation system thar will help pxomote
completed poxtions of the Inteiurban and healthy community principles by cooidinating
Gxeen Rives TxaiLs connect pedesmans, ]�d use, the non-motorized tcansportation
cyclisu, and equestrians to azeas north and systezn, and tcansit in a mannex that
, south of tlubum, while the White Rivex Txail �couxages wallcing and birycling. T1ie Puget
provides foz east-west tcavel. Additional bike Sound Regional Gouncil has identified several
lanes thzough town and completion of the ��ents, wluch conuibute to the desixability
paved txail netwozk will guide cyclists safely of wallcing,birycling,and transit use.3
to points of intexests and thxough congested . Concentrating complementazy uses such as
azeas of the City. restaurants,retail assd grocesy stores
The establishment of an equeshian disuict pxoximate to residences and employment.
and ttails in the southeast portion of the City • Linking neighborhoods by connecting srseets,
pe�mits moie opportunities fox equestrian sidewalks,and txails.
travel in scenic azeas. • Designing for safe and wdcomiug pedestrian
Pedestrians will be able to teavel moxe safely �d bicyde faciliries.
and cbmfortably with the compledon of the
sidewalk network, new crossings and sueet
lighting, increased dxivet awaxeness, and 'Vision 2040 Update Issue Paper on Health WhaYs
bettet srteet des� neaz schools and Health Got to Do with Growth Managemen'
� Economic Development and Transportation.,Puget
frequendy teaveled pedestrian locations. The Sound Regional CounciL Dec.2,2004.
ChapJer3. NanMotori�edTran.rportation . PQ�3-�8
���F =�* ; Comprehensive Transportation Plan
��: ._ - . . -
WASHINGTON
• Enhancing rtansit oppoxtunities and non-
motorized connecdons to mensit facilities.
• Reducing and mitigating the effects of
, p�g
These principles, many of which can be
pzomoted by thoughtful transportation
systems planning, encoutage healthiet
communities by incseasing physical activity
and decceasiag ait pollution caused by vehicle
emissions. Aubum has historically planned
fot a transportation system that incorpozates
many healthy community prindples, such as
transit faci]ity pLwning and regional trail
planning. In addition, the Downtown Plan calls
foz a miaed-use, high density, pedestrian
oriented downtown. In the future, 'Aubum
shall coatinue m promote these prindples
• thtough long-range plann� efforts, capital
fadlity improvements, deoclopment xeview,
and community activities uroolviag active
lifestyle eletnents.
IMPLEMENTAT'ION TOOLS
The City has developed policies and identified
fuuding strategies "that avill help implement
the futute non-motori%ed netovoxk. They can
be found in Chapters 5 and 6 of tlus plan.
The planning clixection outlined ia this
chapter shall be used as the foundadon for
implementing the non-motorized polides and
secuiing funding.
I
� Chapter 3: Non MotoriZed Tran.porlation Pagc.3-19 ,
�a�oF. ,=.�*.. Comprehensive Transportation Plan
A.�a'�`��q$H� ..
�
Table 3-�4 Future Trail and Bicycle Faatity Proiects
� - . .
• . -
_---- — -----, — . ._ , , ----- - - — —.;_
Skinner- Thfs trail, located within the Ci(y of Paciflc,will provide connectlons for users west of the Bieyclists
Road/3b BNSF railroad fo the White Wver Trail,the Supermall and downtown Aubum via the C Pedestrians
Avenue ' Streetdail.
Green River This paved trail will be part of a regfonal recreational cortidoc King County is the Iead Bicyclists
Treil administrator of the project but will work,in coltaboration with the City for tJie portion"of Equestrlans
the trail in Auburn..The trail alignment wilf extend along the west bank of the Green petlestrians
River from 5 277""St.,south to Brannan and Dykstra Parks.It will then cross at the
Dykstra Park bridge wer to the east bank before aossing back to the weet bank at the
Green River beach aaess.A parallel trall on the east side of the Green River will exist
between S 277'�"St.and Dykstra Park,also providing a rnnnecSion to Green River Road.
Two bridgesare proposed;one souUi of ffie new,S 277"'St.and one for tfie Green River
beach access.The trail will end at Aubum Narrows. There may be some txhnical
difficuldesaligning the trail on the east side of the river from 5. 277th Street to the 8th
Street NE Bridge. Safety issues will have to be studied further and adequately addressed
during 7mplementaUon of the treil.
Mill Geek This looped,recreational path spurs off tfie IMenirban Trail and will go through the Off-road GyclisTs
Path Auburn Environmental Park. Pedestrians
Equestrians,
possibly
White River The White River T2il runs along the soirth side of the White River from.Roegner Park to Bicydists
Treil the eastem edge of Game Farm Park.. Future extensions of the trail are planned from A Equ�,trians
Street SE to Roegner Park,across the Whife River via the fvture BNSF Railroad Off-road 6yciists
underpass,on the south side of the river within the Gtynf Padflc,and from Gariie Fartn p��ans
Wildemess Park to southeast Aubum along the White River.
Williams These recreational trails are intended to use public or quasi-public lands, including uGlity Bicydist5
Trail corridors.A variety of loop traiis may be possible within this large area. Equeslrians
Off-roatl Cyclistr
Pedeetrians
Bonneville This east-west trail wlll;extend from Lea Hill topotentlally I Street,where it will mnnect Bicyclists
Power Trail to We�Hill vla the 37w Street NW street ROW. There are topographiwl and Pedestrians
environmental challenges that will need tn be addressed during the design phase. Eq�e�rians
Academy The portion of Andemy Drive from.SR 164 to Green Valley Road is pertnanently closed Bicyclis�
Trail to vehide traffic. However, it has the potemial to be re-opened as a muRi-use Pedestrians
recreational trail. Equestrlans
Lakeland This trail conneds the growing Lakeland development with Mill Pond Drnre and Oravetz Pedestrians
Hills Trail Road. Itis unlque in Aubum because it passes directly through a residential
neighborhood. A significant portion of the trall ls already built;futvre mnnections will
allow residents to travel firom Oravetr Road to Lake Tapps Parkway and Sunset Park.
'Refer to Figure 3-4 for the location of fufure trail projeds.
Chapter3. Non-Moton�ed Tran.rportatioa Pag�j-2�
���F =�"�-�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�Y : .=U�T
��WASHINGTON
I
Table 3-34 Future Trail and Bicycle Facility Projects
. ,
� - . .
Skinner- This trail, located witliin the C�ty of Padfic,will provide connections for users west of the Bicydists
Road/3'" BNSF 2ilroad to the White River Trail,the Supermall and dowrdawn Aubum via the C. Pedestrians
Avenue Strpet trail.
Green RNer This paved trail will be part of a regfonal recreational mrridor. IGng County Ls the lead Bicyclists
T211 administ2tor of the project but wiil work in collaboration with the Clty for the pordon of EquesMans
the trail in Aubum.The hail alignment will extend along the west bank of the Green pedesErians
River from 5 277""St.,wuth;to Brannan and Dykstra Parks.It will then cross at the �
Dykstra Park bridge over to tlie east bank before crossing badc to the west bankat the
Green Ri4er beach:eaess.A pardllel trail on the east side of the Green Rfver will exist
between 5 277'"St and Dykstra Park,alw providing a connedion to Green River Road.
Two bridges are proposed;one soutfi of the new S 2TN'St and one for the Green River
beach acce�s.The trail will end et Aubum Narrows. There may be some techniol
difflaltles aligning the trail on the east side of the river from S.277th Street to the Sth
StreetNE Bridge. Safely issues will have to be studied further and adequately addre�ed
dudng ImplemeMation of the trail.
Mill Creek This looped reaeatlonaf path spurs off the Interurban Trail and will go through the Off-road(.yclists
Path Aubum Environmental Park. Pedestrians
Equestrians,
possibly
White River The White River Trail runs along the wuth side of the White River from Roegner Park to Bicydists
Trail the eastem edge of Game Fartn Park. Future octen,sions of the trail are planned from A Equestrians
Sd+eet SE W Roegner Park,aaoss the White River via the future BNSF Railroad pff road Cyclistr
underpass,on the soirth�de of the river within the Gty of Padfic,and from Game Fartn p��ans
Wildemess Park to southeast Aubum along the White River.
Williams These recreatlonal trails are intended to use public or quasi-pubiic lands, Including utility Bicyclisls
Trail corridors.A variety of loop trails may be possible within this large area. Equestrians
Off-road C,yclists
. Pedestrians
Bonneville Triis east-west trail will ectend fiom Lea Hill to potentially I Street,where it wfll cannect Bicyclists.
Power Trail to West Hill via the 37tl'Street NW street ROW. There are Lopogtaphiol and Pedestrians
environmerrtai challenges ttiat will need to be addressed during the design phase. Equestrians
Academy The portlon of Academy Drive from SR 164 M Green Valley Road Is pertnanently dosed Bicydists
Treil to vehicle traffic. However; it hasihe potentlal to be re-opened as a muPo-use Pedestrlans
recreatlonal trail. Eauestrfans
Lakeland This trall connec�s thegrowfng Lakeland developmeM with Mill Pond DrNe and Orave� Pedestrians
Hilts Trail Road. Itisunique in Aubum because It passes direRly through a resider�tlal
neighborhood. A signiflmqt portion of the trail.fs already bulft;future annectlons will
allow residents to travel from Oravelz Road Lo lake Tapps Parkway andSunret Park.
•Refer to Figure 3-4 for the locatiori of fiiture Vail projects.
Chapler 3. Non Motonxed Tmn�porlation Page3-21
Table 3-2 PHority Bicycle Facilities Inventory
Segment Current,3treet RA_W Existing
Location Bicycle Proposed Bicycle FacllMies
1D# Classiflcation Impacts Facilities
1 Arterial A St NW 15th:St NW.B 3rd None None SUiped Bike Lane on one side of street
St NW'
Green River Rd between N
Non Ciry Limits and 104th Ave SE Sharrows-shoulder to right wheel well on both sides install
2 Residen6al and 104th Ave SE between None None "Share the Road"signage along street segment; Improve
Collector Green.River Rd and Bth St asphalt on shoulder on west side
NW �
Maintain shoulder with bike signage-preference for uphill is to
Lea Hill Rd between 104th • I
3 Arterial None None move in fogi�ine and narrow IaneSo allow for striped
Ave SE and 132nd Way:SE , ;
pedestrian/bike lane� .
. I
I
_ �
WSDOT
Peasley Canyon Road to W SViped bike lanes on both sides of sVeet-reduce speed limit to �
4 Arterial Valley Hwy ROW None 35 MPH '
impacts �
,
. � �
None north SViped BiRe',Lanes'on both sides along!enfire route;.Need to i
Yes, oF 29th St, transitlon riders at 12th StreetlM Street intereection to help ,
M St SE beiween'E Main St significant Striped bike! prepare forsafe crossing at 17th:StreeVAubum'Way South/M i
5 Artedal and 37th St SE ROVN lanes Street Intersection; 17th Street realignment project will close off !
impacts between bike access via 17th-investigate existing island at M ;
29th& 37th. Streetll7th Street I
� I
6 Residential S 296th St between 51st Ave None None Sharrows&"Share the Road"signage on uphill portion&
Collector S and W Valle H Sharrows on shoulder inside of fo line from 65th to 51 st �
15th St NW beiween M St WSDOT �
7 Arterial NW and Interurban Trail ROW None Paved bike path on both sides �
impacts
�
� ;
' 1 12/21Y1011
Table 3-2 Priority Bicycle Facilitiesinventory
Segment Current Street R=O=W Ezisting
Cocatlon � Bicycle Proposed Bicycie Facilities
ID# Classiflcatlon Impacts Facllfties �
8 Arteriai E Main;St belween'M St'and None None Sharrows and "Share the Road"signage
R St
Auburn Way South belween Directional signage only-direct onto Dogwood only; "Share the
9 � ' Arterial Dogwood StSE and 32nd Sb None None Road"signage
SE
Residential R St NE between 8th St NE SViped bike Lanes on both sides- possible lane size
10 None None reductioNno parking elimination; 2 bike lanes with parkfng on
Collector and EMain St one side
I St NE to 14th St NE to Pike
11 Arterial St NE belween 37th St NE None None Install bike symbol signs within bike lanes
and 8th St NE
Lakeland Hills Way between Sharrows between curb and fog line and"Share the Road"
12 Arterial Oravetz Rd SE and Lake None ' None
Ta s P SE signage spaced along travel route
10th St NE to 9th St NE to
13 Arterial 8th St NE between C SkNW None None Sharrows 8"Share the Road"signage along entire route
and Pike St NE
Non qth St NE beiween Aubum
14 Residential Ace NE and M St NE None None Use existing facilities 8 install"Share the Road"signage
Collector
Kersey Way SE belween R Tapered road does not allow for safe bicyclist movements; need
15 �Arterial St SE'and Lake Tapps Pkwy None None to connect asphalt sections= short term fix
SE
16 ARerial 37th St NE�between.6 St NW None None Sharrows&"Share ihe Road"signage
and I StNE
8th St NE behveen R St NE Shared pedestrian/bike sidewalk along south side of 8th Street
17 ' Arterial and'104th Ave SE Yes None from R Street tobridge
Residential '3Zth StBE behveen M;St SE
18 None. None Need crosswalkacross.R Street at 37th,Street intersection
Collector and�R St'SE
Lakeland Hills Way to
79 Arterial. Oravetz Road to Orevetz None None Share 4he road;and directional signage
` Place AStLoo �
2 12/21/2011
Table 3-2;Priority Bicycle Facilities Inventory.
Segment Current Street R-O-W' Exiating
ID# Classification Locatfon �mpacts B�cycle Proposed Blcycle Facilktes
Facilkles
8th St NE beiween Pike Sf Crosswalk needed at Sth{StreeUR Street intersection to transfer
20 Arterial NE and R St NE None None to north side connection toR'Street
R St NE to Aubum Block Install bike lanes on both sides outside of fog Iine belween'East
21 Arterial Diamond Rd belwee� E Main None None Main and RR tracks-look at narrowing lanes; Install"Share the
St and E City Cimit Road"signage belween RR tracks a�d Aubum Black Diamond
Road
Mafn Stbetween A St NW
22 Arterial and M St NE None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
23 Arterial M St NE belween 4th St NE None None Striped bike lanes on both'sides along entire route-3 lane
and E Main St • - facility with bike;lanes. ,
Residential D St SEbetween 37th St SE
24 None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
Collector and 41st St SE
37th St NW belween West Speed Concems; Current Speed of 40 MPH too high; Ramps at
25 Arterial None None Interurban Trail not at wrrect grede for sight visibility;
Valley Hwy and B St NW V etation at 37th Street arkin lot over rown
112th Ave SE to SE 81st St
26 Arterial belween SE;304th St and SE None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
274th St
Non SE304th St behveen112th
27 Residential AVe SE and 124th Ave.SE None None ' $harrows and"Share:the Road"'signage
Collector
124th Ave SE behveen SE
28 Arterial None None Sharrows and "Share the Road'"signage
304th'St and N Ci Limits
29 Arterial 124th Ave SEbetween SE None None Sharrows and "Share the Road"signage
304th St and SE 312th St
30 Arterial �24th Ave SE between SE None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
312th St and S6320th St
Non SE 320th St between 124tfi
31 Residential qve SE and 112th Ave SE None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
Collector
3z Residentiai 112th Ave SE behveen Lea None None Sharrows and"Share:the Road"signage
Collector Hill Rd SE and SE 320th St
33 Arterial �32nd Ave SE between SE None None Sharrows and"Share;the Road"signage
288th St and SE 304th St
3 12/21/2011
Table 3-2 Priority Blcycle Facilities Inventory
Segment Current 3treet RA-W Existing
ID# Classiflcatlon Location �mpacts B�cycle Propoaed.Bicycle,Facilkies
Facilitfes
Non � SE 304th`St between 124th
34 Residential Ave;SE and 132nd`Ave SE None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
Collector
35 Arterfal �5th St NW between M St None None Striped bike lanes on both sides
NW and Terrace Dr NW
36 Arterial W Valley Hwy,betweemW None None Striped bike lanes on both sides
Main St and 15th St NW
37 Arterial 132nd Way/Ave SE belween None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
SE 312th St and SE 304th St .
Non S 331st St behveen 321st St
38 Residential None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
Collector S and W VallegHwy
_ _ _ _ _ _
Lake Tapps Pkwy to Sumner
39 Arterial Tapps Hwy between 182nd None None Striped pedestrian bike lanes on both sides
Ave E and S Ciry Limits
40 Arterial 41st St SE belween C St SW None None Sharrows and "Share the Road"signage
and D St SE
4� Residential Howard Rd SE beiween None None Sharrows and"Share the Road"signage
Collector Rivervvalk Dr SE and???
42 Arterial 29th St SE behveen M:St SE None None Install bike symbols in existing bike lanes
and Riverwalk DrSE
Dogwood Sf:SE to Forest _
43 Local Street Ridge DrSE to 28th St SE None None Sharcows and directional signage
belween Aubum Way.South
and Rivervvalk DrSE
Interurban Trail south.of;West Main Street needs to be repaired;
Interurban ' Need to explore speed:reduc6ons.near all Interurban Trail
44 North/south through City None None
Trail Crossings;vegetation maintenance needed on Interurban Trail
� on!both sides of 37th St NE�
45 Principal Trail Connecfion None None Directional signage onty
Arterial �
4' 12/21/2071
Table 3-2',Priority 8icycle Eacilities Inventory
Segment Currenf Street R-O-W Existing j
ID# Classlfication Cocatlon �mpacts B�cycle Proposed Bicycle Facilities I
Facilities.
Residential New shared use bridge over the river connecting M St SE to ;
46 Collecto� M St SE overWhite,River Yes None Whiter River Trail.
Residential 62nd Street beriveen
47 Lakeland Hills Way 8 lake None None Striped bike lanes on both sides along entire route
Collector ' Ta s'Parkwa
48 Arterial A Street SE between Yes Nbne Signage only
Ellingson &Trail Connection
49 Arterial M Street oveP White River Yes Non B�cyclelpedestrian bridge over White River to connect to White
River Traif
B SVeebbelween 37th St NW
50 Arterial None None Sharrows&signage
&30th Sf N W•
51 Arterial . B'Sheet between,30th StNW None None Sharrows,8•signage
& 15th St NW
52 Arterial B Street belween 3rd St NW None None Sharrows.&directional signage
8 West Main SUeet
Peasley Canyon Road from Bike path on outer edge of Peasley Canyon Park-n-Ride for
' 53 Arterial 321st to W.Valley Highway None None uphill climb;
W. Main $treet belween Interurban Trail.west to.W Valley Hwy= 3 vehicle lanes and
54 Arterial None Yes
Interurban Trail 8 A St SW striped bike'lanes on both,sides �
W. Main Street between W Valley Hwy: to Interurban Trail = 3 vehicle lanes and striped
55 ARerial Interurban Trail &W. Valley None None bike lanes on'both sides
� Highway
56 Arterial D ood Loo None None Shatrows and si na e
57 Residential 62nd Street belween Lake None None Sharrows and signage
Collector Tapps Parkway& 16th Street
5 12/21/2011
�f`� Figure 3-5: Bicycle Corridors and Connectors � ;
� � � - � -
� � i .�� . �o �
� Ta
r' i, rP � ���� 1 _ Keet
I 1 �ke��et � � sia
_ �, � � �
� � Sqetile. , �� � �
� , � �
e �
..' � � � � t - 1 � � .
� I ^ I � � Feet . .. ���� -
To To
Fedenl �^_D�\'i'�i �_ _ ' .� � ; � Ke�t
µ�•y C;°6��:�+�1` I�f 2�nili,r_—. -2Z�i��,,-����y:� . .
\ �
■ 3
�1 � N '� � �+ -� �-� --� �
I� r� � ir::s�n,,.;�. ��
i ` ' � � �-
1--�- - ----- - �j � U �-, `,, ' �� II � II .' 'I
�� � � �� ■ � wson I1 �.+ �
�J II ■ VOPN II 6 II- ���
� I ��� ill��^ � �� �
� � �i � � ,y,
,
To . � �\ `�i . � � . 3�a�nhi:sra� - � _� �
Feder�i i �/ � II � /
w.. ` \`� I�i jj/ � �
t {� - � ' � �'/ �
, �.i�r. � Y F� I
� I , .ueuAx ^ � 1 i Te�
� nxn��x m�r
r.xK mune II �' I � heZ� �
�I � R�t��iy°�II
� �.: ' i `� �zEr�Rml�r�ia � � p
i u.wn�o
� �y� -. _o`� 'onN
w ' �. ' p^1' .-
�., ` .� '
> � _
W o =
� � m
I 'Nw a' r .. wnFC I
t�THFST� A4Y`'_
p �f/'' n � � p{\4G ym�'^ SF.1,1.i,T�M:.`Y wc[wavs I
�f (+W�0�R°
o �V � �. � ` � ���y� � � �I
Te 4716THSyT i v� y� ,y � Jr
Feder�l , a ° f�k � �E 1 To I
� �u+ I � 1 (f � I
W�y �l . j � i �H=ST•N �'� � a Bl�ck �
� ■ 'Y.' � Dltsoed
�vLIS4S.7:s TNS�`� =,
PVWPH i
pV1110NNFMTAI
�K � I N,
� µ GPr: �
,� � y II } � •,t,, , �
� I �
��� � w�iN,a_ r �IL. IIm � 'Sr� ; �1 � ....� ���.�.� :� I
�l� �i �� 7 w�ouxri . • _ ,. �., �r ' �1 � I
oowMOwx
1 itp:s� �
�� Rfyl51;�Y-AN.YOW�RR ' _ � n 'S?-SE� � � ♦ . I
� � 5\� �
ii � , � � IP �■ 5TH F, \� I �\ `� �\_r ,�
I � i/ W�fIVMLL f � �[ .`�_,//�/ I
�/ � O � I �- '-�'/�%Ql✓� .
� �J!^�� - � 1
I�� -,.�,-71�--- LSTMiYT.'4.W � I � 1 I
i ���lY!�� � �
�N�JiEn4lNDSI�BL46K t^T�i:ST=S[ �
� � ,, � 1 � ��
, ; .
� ~, �I I I I QLHURNa�y,4 W5,`�n.u�c\ur ,�\ �
`1 iI.
r I j �I �.a.._ ` + To
� � ' .,�� Fl�mlo7�
I J� 1 I . � �:�� ' �--�� � Geyser �
l M �
` � � � s i -
1 1 ` zemn,srse �_--- - � `
� I :�C�;���' ti � I�� ^ '
, ,, � � � y 1
- ----, �„
Ta 1��1I, �� .. rrx.0 �
Ed�e�vood fl�l � 1 � �F �
� 1:I� ` � \
1+
r�i�� r � L — r > \ 1
R/��ill....�. �
i ti, � � -� � '�:i�.r
I��� I +� To
"Q �"1 �� � � El�mei�w
�ic' - � ; 'aUGr.sr.5. � � � ���� ►
i� - o � ,;' 1 .
Y � � '
;� � ,� - -�-- � �� �
� ,o ti
� , �W~� a
vi�yP. �
V
�,M �Q Fae ♦
�t-::.l��� i :'1iW -" ♦
To ' '�l �,
Ntltes 'wy 11, �I �
; � ` 1�.^I +� " «� �.��� -� �a�� � �� � ti� � ���'. � ��♦
a 111';' 1 i� + �.__ \
I�
I �'� ' w t y ��
. `'i �' ' ' •�`W�s �
� ���� '�u
� 1 i����� 's;, �
� � .����?i, �� To
� Y
�l� ' . 1 'Cs� ux�uuo�mu �'���, ' Bonne
�1,II mwwtxnu �• �� Late
.. �.� ��.I i "i ' � ♦
_ . Schools 4 � - � " - � -'y
r 1 '— "-� �
i �Connectors '► '� � ^ �
�Cortidors t � _''�hi.�'��.-�` � ���
' ;�� �
���Interurban Trail �
Parks �
1 '� ,
�y+Aubum Ciry Limits � �� �
_ r� � '
. �FocusAreas i � � � ro �-
To S�meer
' j tiumner � & �
. ., ^ , ti�+ I\p N� � Boeeey � ' .� .
., T�e�Um• Puvnllnp � L�ke .
' �� ♦ 1 1
��F �%_�' Comprehensive Transportation Plan
����
/r ._
� WASHINGTON
CHAPTER 5.
POLICIES
Tiansportation objectives and policies �
establish the fcamework for zealizing rhe -
City's vision of its transpoztarion system. _ - =\
Policies pzovide guidance for the City, othes
govemmental entities and private �
developess, enabling rhe City to achieve its Public Art on West Main Street
goal of psoviding adequate public
infrastcucture to support its needs and 5.1 Coordination, Planning
priorities in accotdance with the Cit�s and Implementation
Compzehensive Plan. The poliry fcamework
presented below is a guideline, which the OBJECTIVE: COORDINATION
City will use to evaluate mdividual pZOjects
and addcess i�s infcasuuccuze needs. To be consistent with regional plans and the
plans of neighboring cities, to encourage
The objectives and policies axe oto ni�ed partnerships, and not to unreasonably
according to five b�oad headings. The fusc preciude an adjacent jurisdiction from
heading, Cnordinorion, Planrring and implementing its planned improvements.
Implementotian, addxesses rhe system
comprehensively, detailing policies that POLiCIES:
pertain to the planning and implementation TR-1: Coordinate rtansportation opesations,
of the syscem as a whole. The subsequent p�anning and impzovemenu with othes
four headiugs list polides specific to the ��po�tion authorities and govemmental
following systems: Street.ryrtem, Non-motoriZed entities (dties, counties, tribes, state, fedexal)
ry.rtem, Tran.rit ryttem, and Air han.rportation. to address t�aasportation issues. These
The analysis of the rtaasportation system, as indude:
well as any individual proposals, shall �Ptovement of the state highway
conside= all modes of tcansportation and all • netwoxk through stcong advocacy with
methods of efficiendy mana.gna the
network. state officials,both elected and staff, foz
impzovements to state highways and
intexchanges;
■ Improvements to roadways connecang
Aubum to the suttounding zegion,
including SR 1G7, SR 18,SR 181/West
Valley Hwy,SR 164,and S 277th Stxeet;
Chapler 5.Pa6�ie.r Page S-1
/��;�,.�F -"�-T��-��:'�T Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
r���_V �N�o
■ Impxoved access to the Intexstate 5 match transportation granu, pzomote safery,
comdoi and zegional employment integrate planning of othes pzojects
centexs; requ'ving distuzbance of pavements,
■ -Tzansit connections to the Regional p=omote mobiliry, and optimize the
Crxowtli Centexs• utilization of existing infiastcucture.
� EstablishingtheAubumStationasa OBJECTIVE: SAFETY
centet for multi-modal txansportation
connectiong to ptoposed future intexciry To provide a transportation system that is safe
rail service; for all users.
■ , Suong advocacy with US congressional POLICIES:
membexs to ptovide fiinding to mitigate TR-4: Safety shall be prioritized over driving
trinsportadon problems connected to convenience.
intezstate commexce;and
TR-5: Use net revenues ftom photo
■ Proactively pucsuing fozums to enfozcement operations to fund safety
cooidinate rtansporration project xelated pzojects.
priorities among othes goveminental
enddes,including pzoposed future TR-6: Recognize the potential effects of
intezcity xail s8rvice. hazazds on tcansportation facilities and
incorpozate such considesations inro the
OBJECTIVE: LONG-RANGE planning and design of transpoitation
PLANNING & PROGRAMMING pxojects,whexefeasible.
' To continue to plan forthe future ofthe mulU- OBJECTIVE: CONNECTIVITY
modal_transportation system through long-
range planning, programmatic planning, and To provide a highly interconnected network of
financial planning, in compliance with the �T�� and trails for ease and variety of
Growth Management Act. treveL
POLICIES: POLICIES:
TR-2: The Comprehen.rive Tran.portation Plan TR-7: An efficient tsansportation spstem
, shall be evaluated and amended annually to seeks to spread vehicle movemenu ovet a
ensuze it is technically accutate, consistent series of planned streets. The goal of the
with srate, reg}onal, and othes local plans, system is to encouxage connectiviry while
and in keeping with the City's vision of the pzevendng unacceptalily high traffic
futuxe transportarion system. volumes on any one stceet. Ample
altematives should exist to accommodate
TR-3: The Si.x-Year Trqn.�ortation Impmvement access foi emetgency vehicles. Fox diese
Program(I'IP) and CapitalFaci/itie.r Plan (CFT') reasons the City will continue to plaa a
' shall be updated annually to teevaluate series of collectors and artevaLs desigued to
jixojea priorities, develop a plan to fund national standaxds to ptovide effident
capital improvement projects, and ensute service to the community.
consistency between ptoject priorides and
financing plaas. Ptoject evaluation criteria TR-8: Encourage the use of rtaiLs.and othes
shall �fostet economic developmen� connections that pzovide ease of tcavel
ma�ci*n±�e utilization of city financing to �� �d between neightioihoods;
�� Cbapter5.Po/i�ra Page S-1 �
���f =� :• _ Comprehensiv.e Transportation Plan
,f°`1�U' • ` '
WASHINGTON
community acdvity centers, and tcansit TR-]3: Context and flexibility in baLuicing
services. Development pattems that block uset needs shall be consideted in the design
d'uect pedestiian access aze discouraged. of all projects and if necessazy, 'a deviation
Ample altemadves should exist to from the Auburn Engineering De.rign Standardr
accommodate non-xnotoxized uansportation may be gzanted to ensute the Complete
on arterials, collectors,and local roads. Stceeu Objective and suppotting polides aze
aclueved.
OBJECTIVE:
COMPLETE STREETS �`
�.�., - � �.:,�,.,;,- -�_.
��,.. . .• ..
Ensure Auburn's transportation ,system is �'�
designed to enable corriprehensive, �� "� �j
integrated, safe access for users of all ages ��� '-s
and abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists,
motorists, transit riders and operators, and
truck operators.
POLICIES: y .,
S'
TR-9: Plan for aad develop a balanced
transportation system, which pzovides safe Q
access and connectivity to transportation
facilities fot usess of all ages and abiliues _ -
including pedestdans, biryclisu, motorists, Helping those with Special Needs
transit users and opesators, and truck
operators. OBJ ECTIV E:
TR-10: Plan foi, design; and coasuvct all ENVIRONflflENTAL PROTECTION
mansporrarion projecrs, wherher City led ox Minimize the environmental impacts of all new
development driven, co provide appxopriace transportation projects and transportation
accommodation for bicyclists, pedestrians, related improvements.
and transit usecs ia a maaaes consistent with pOLICIES:
the Comprehensive Plan, eaccept in
situations where the establishment of such TR-14: Thoroughly evaluate the impacts of
facilities would be contru�y to public health a11 transportation projects and apply
and safety ot the cost would be egcessively app=opriate mitigadon measuces in
disproportionate to the need confoxmance with SEPA, the Critical Axeas
Ozdinance, and othet dry, counry, stau, and
TR-11• Ensuce the txansportation system fedetal regulations.
meets the xequuements outlined in the
Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). TR-]5: Identifp and consides the
environmental impacts of uansportation
TR-12: The Auburn Engfneering De.dgn p=o�qcu at the eazliest possible time to
Standardc is the primazy vehicle for executing �sute planning and decisions teflect
the Complete Stteets Objective and sfiould enviconmrntal values,to avoid de]ays later in
include standatds for each toadway �e pzocess, and to xeduce or avoid potential
classification to guide implementation. p=oblems that may advessely impad the
envuonment and project outcome.
Cbaprer S.Po4cier P°8`5-3
CffYOF .��-��: ComprehenSive Transportation Plan
�AU��J •RN
WASHINGTON
TR-1G: Incorpozate gxeen technology and two truck ioutes meet on the City arterial
sustainability pzacdces into tsansportation and collector netwoLk
impzovements whenever feasible. d. An increase in congestion wluch
TR-17: Support efforts to unpxove aix constitutes an unacceptable adverse
quality throughout the Aubucn azea and envuonmental impact undex the State
develop a transportation system compadble Enviconmental Policy Act.
with the goals of the Fedexal and State Clean e. A reduction in any of the thzee (3) LOS
�`��' standazds below.
TR-18: Requize air quality studies of futuxe 1. Azterial and Collectox Corridor LOS: The
majoz development to assess impacts level-of-seivice standazd for each arterial
aeated by site genexated fxaffic. �d collector corridox is "D", unless
OBJECTIVE• LEVEL-OF- otherwisespecifiedinChaptex2ofthisplan.
SERVICE (LOS) THRESHOLD The Ciry may requize a developec—to
exanune a shorter ot longec corridoi
To ensure that new development does not segment than is specified in Chapcei 2, co
degrade transportation facilities to below LOS ensute a project's total LOS impacts aze
standards. evai,�aced.
PoLICIES: 2. Sianalized/Roundabout Intersection LOS:
TR-19: New development shall not be The City may iequire a developes to
allowed when the impacts of the new examine individual signalized o=zoundabout
development on the transportation system intexsecdons foz LOS impacts to ensnre a
degtades the LOS ro below the adopted pzoject's total LOS impacts aze evaluated.
LOS standaxd, unless the condition is 3. Unsigna]ized Intexsection LOS: The level-
remedied concuuent with the development of-service standazd foi these intessections,
as descubed in Chaptex2. measuied as if th wexe si e shall be
eY K°� �.
TR-20: The texm "below level-of-sexvice" level of service "D". If LOS falls below the
shall apply to situations whexe traffic standaxd, analysis and mitigatioa may be
attributed to a development likely xesults in required in a mannex commensuzate with
any of the following. the associated impacts: This may include,
a. An unacceptable increase in hazazd ox an among othet tequitements, coaducting a
unacceptable decrease in safety on a �ffic signal wartant analysis and installing
ox financiug a signal oi roundabout.
toadway.
b. An accelezated deterioxation of the srteet TR-21: Establish a muld-modal level-of-
pavement condition oz the proposed xegulax service system in the furiue.
use of a street not designated as a truck TR-22: A.M. level of service may need to be
toute for tnxck moveznents that can analyzed in situations whete speeialized
reasonably result in accelexated deterioration condidons exist that dispLOpoztionately
of the sueet pavement. impact a.m. traffic.
c. An unacceptable impact on geometric
design conditions at an intersecdon where
Chapter S.Po/iare.r PQBe f-4
��F =-�"� * • Comprehensive Transportation Plan
���o _ _ . -
WASHINGTON
OBJECTIVE: CONCURRENCY TR-27: Coordinate transporrarion
To ensure transportation facilities do not fall �provemenu cvirh rhe Srace, Counties, and
below the adopted level-of-Service standard, neighboring jutisdicdons to encoucage.
as required by the Growth Management Act. �ough trips to occuc on state faciliries,
xeducing stcess on the ciry srteet netwozk.
PoL[cg?s:
TR-23: Require developeis to consttuct ox OBJECTIVE: FINANCE
finance �ransporcauon improvemencs To finance the transportation systems
and/o� implemenc stracegies that mitigace necessary to serve new development, while
rhe iinpaccs of new development concuxrenc ensuring the Gty has the capabiliry to finance
wirh (wirlvn 6 yeazs o� developmenr, as general transportation needs.
requited by the C�owth Management Act. pOI.ICIES:
TR-24: New development that lowexs a TR-28: Require developexs to construct
faality's level-of-service standazd bdow the �sportation systems needed to sesve new
locally adopted �xi*+±+*+um standatd shall be developments.
denied, .as requiced by thc Growth
Management Act Srtategies that may allow a TR-29: Actively puisue the fotmation of
development to ptoceed include,but aze not ��� �provemrnt Districts (LID) to
limited to: upgzade existing streets and sidewalks and
construct new stceets to the appropriate
■ Reducing the scope of a pzoject(e.g. standazd.
platting fewec lots oz building less squate `
footage); TR-30: Impzovements that secve necv
■ Building oz financing aew transportation developments will be constiucted as a part
impzovemenu concutxmt with (within 6 of the development piocess. All wsts will
yeazs o� development; be bome by the developes whm the
development is sesved by the pzoposed
■ Phasing/delayinga project; transportation imptovemenu. In some
■ Requiring thedevelopment to instances; the City may choose to paztidpate
incoxpo=ate Tzansportation Demand in this construction if improvements serve
Managementsttategies,ot � moxe thas adjacent developments.
■ Lowezing level-of-service srandasds. TR-31: Revenues for street txansportation
TR-25: The denial of developmeat in oidet impzovements should primarily p=ovide foz
to maintain concuuency may be gtounds for the ozclerly development of the City's
declaring an emagency for the putpose of t�ansportation system in compliance with
amending the Compnbensive Plan outside of the Compnhen.rive Tran,portalion Plan. The
the annual amendment rycle. basic criterion for such funding should be
TR-26: Evaluate city teansportatibn faciliries �e degxee to which that projecr impxoves
annually to detemuue compliance with the �e overall tcansportation system and not
adopted level-of-service standatds and, as �e benefit that might accrue to individual
necessary, amead the Szx-Yenr Trun.rportation P=opetties. Where it.is possible to establish
Impmvement Pmgram (TIP) and Capita! a direct =elarionship between a .needed
Facilitie.c .Plan (CFP) to xemedy identified �P=ovement and a decelopment; the
defidencies.
Cbopler S.PoGcie.r � Page 5-S
���F .=�'��''� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
A� �UR�
,r''--�'� WASHWGTON
development should be expected to POLICIES
contribute to its construction. TR-37: Utilize education to inctease
TR-32: Encouiage public/private awazeness of existing traffic laws and safety
partnecslvps foi financing transportation issues, especially as they celate to pedestrians
projects that remedy existing and anticipated and biryclists.
tcansportation pxoblems, oi that foster TR-38: Engage the community in
economic gzoarth. transportadon issues through public
TR-33: Aggressively seek and take advantage involvement and partnesships with
of fedexal, state, local, and private funding oxo ni�ations such as the Aubum School
and lending soutces that help implement the District.
City's Comp�rhenrive Tran.por4atioa Plan. TR-39• Identify azeas with persistent.tcaffic
TR-34: Maintain a traffic impact fee system violations and address these violations, in
based on the Institute of Traffic Engineess part, through Police Deparhment
(ITE) guidelines, as modified by the Ciry enforcement.
Council, as a means of enabling TR-40: Develop rides information packages
development to mitigate appxopriately for �at infoxm usexs of commutet, ttansit, xail,
assodated rraffic unpacts. ��d air aansportation opportunities.
TR-35: Reassess the land use element of the TR-4L• Emphasize enforcement of the
Compzehensive Plan if funding far ���es of the road" fot pedestxians, biryclists
tiansportation facilities is insufficient to �d motorists whose actions endanger
inaintainadopted level-of-secvice standatds. othezs. Conduct enforcement in a manner
OBJECTIVE: QUALITY OF LIFE that reinfoxces the messages found:iri,non-
To improve the quality of life for Auburn motorized education&safety piogxams.
residents and husinesses through design of TR-42: Ualize photo enfoxcement, where
the transpol'tatlon 5y5tem. apptopriate, to encourage safet driving
POLICIES: precdces.
TR-36: Eahance the livabiliry of Auburn OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION
thxough a variery of inechanisms, iaduding SYSTEAA MANAGEMENT (TSM)
the innovarive design and consttuction of TO effiCiently operate the existing
roadways, non-motorized facilities, and transportation system through Transportation
associated imptovements. Apply design System Mandgement (TSM) .Strateg'IeS,
scandacds chac resulc in attractive and thereby maximizing resources and reducing
funcdonal cransporraao❑ faciliries. the need for costly system capacity expansion
OBJECTIVE: EDUCATION AND Projects.
ENFORCEMENT Po�ciES:
To improve transpoctation safety and TR-43: Use TSM strategies to moze
awareness through education and efficiendy utilize the exisring inkastcuccure
enforcement. to opamize ccaffic flow and zelieve
congestion. Examples include:
Cbapta S.PoG'der Page 5-6
���F � ;� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�U��
'--^�°'� WASHINGTON
■ Rechannalization/iestriping,adding tum TR-47: Ptogcam signal m,nv to encoutage
]anes,adding/inaeasing,number of specific movements and the ase of tcavel
thzough lanes; soutes that aze underutilized
• Signal interconnect and optimization;
■ Tum movement zestricaons; ,�, F� ,1 ,�,
" Access n anavement;and i�^-
■ Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).
TR-44: Support Intelligent Txansportarion
Systems (ITS) implementation ' `"
cootdinadon with Figure 2-7. Futuxe TTS � I~ ��y`'
cozridors will be prioritized using the
following criteria.
■ Granu,loans,ar parmei funding can be
levexaged to expand the TTS system on a - -- - "-
specific corridor(5). Moving Tra�c More Effectively with
■ There is exisring infras�uccuce rhat Intellfgent Transportation Systems
wouldmakeiteasiecandmozecost - OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION
efficienttoimplementITSelements. DEMAND flAAP1AGEMENT (TDM)
" The corridot(s) completes a logical To utilize.transportation demand management.
segment oz missing liak in the citywide ��e9i� � lessen demand for increased
ITS necwozk. street system capacity, help maintain the LOS
■ Significant tcavel-time savings can be standard, and enhance quality of life for those
aclueved with ITS implementarion. who use and. benefit from the transportation
■ Coaidoz supports othec Ciry System.
communication and technology needs. pOLICIF.S:
■ TI'S implementation would have TR-48: Encoucage the use of high-
significant safety benefits,including
teducing the need foz police flaggers in occupancy vehicles (buses, cazpool, and
intexsections d"�eveats. vanpool) thtough both private pzogxams and
under the duection of Metto and Pie=ce
TR-45: ITS elements include but aze not Tsansit.
lixnited ta
■ Opexational improvements such as TR-49: Pzomote zeduced employee tcavel
txaffic sigaal coordination; during the daily peak uavel periods through
flexible woik schedules and pzog�ams to
■ Traveler infozmation including tcaffic �oW �Ployees to wozk part-time ot fiill-
alerts and emesgenry notification; time ox at altemate wozk sites closes to
■ Incident management;and home.
■ Traffic data collection. TR-50: Encourage employeis to pmvide.
TR-46: Requite development to contribute TDM measuxes in the woxkplace thtough
its shace of TTS improvements as mitigation. such programs as pxefetential packing foi
high-oceupanry vehicles, caz sharing,
ChaPter S.Pa4rier � Pagt 5-7
�
�m�F =� ,, Comprehensive Transportation Plan
AU�=L`JJ�T
,,^'"'--�'� WASHWGTON
impioved access foz transit vehicles, and high pedesuian and rtansit use, it may be
employee incenuves foz using high- appiopriate to xeduce the developex parking
occapanry vehicles. obligadon to aclueve other community
benefits oi employ innovative pazldng '
TR-51: In making funding decisions, stsategies such as the use of "pazk & walk"
consides . tiansportatioa investments that
suppoxt txansportarion demaad management lots, whexe people could pazk theu vehicles
appzoaches by pxoviding altematives to and wallc to neazby destinations.
single-occupant vehicles, sucli as trnnsit, OBJECTIVE: PARK-AND-RIDE
bikeways aad pedestrian paths.
To support development of a regional park-
TR-52: Recognize emexging TDM stretegies and ride lot system by Metro Transit, ,Pierce
such as tolling,variable-priced]anes, and car Transit, Sound. Transit, and the Washington
sHaring may be effecride in cerrain State Department of Transportation.
situations.
Por.ic�s:
TR-53: 'Cooxdinate with Metro and otlier
jurisdictions tb enhance Commute Trip TR-59: Encoivage pazk & xide lots on sites.
Reduction (CTR) pzogxams for CTR adjacent to comparible land uses with
employeis in Aubuxn. convenient access to the Aubuin Transit
Station, SR 18, SR 167, and all regional
TR-54: Lead by exatnple thzough tcanspoxtation corridors.
implementation of a thoxough and'
successful Commute-Trip Reduction (CTR) TR-60: Woxk proactively with Sourid
Pzogram for City employees. Transit, WSDOT, Metco Txansit; and Pierce
Txansit to ensure the adequate supply of
OBJECTIVE: PARKING pazk&ridecapaciryinAubum.
To ensure adequate coordination of parking OBJECTIVE: RIGHT-OF-WAY
needs with traffic and development needs.
PoLiCrES: To retain and preserve existing right-of-way,
and identify and acquire.new right-of-way as
TR-55: On-steeet pazking should be allowed needed to achieve the City's objectives.
only when consistent with 'the function of pOLICIES:
the stxeet and with trrffic volumes.
TR-56• New develo ments should tovide TR-61: The acquisirion and p"reservaaon of
P P right-of-way is a key component of
adeqaate off-street parking to meet theix mainra;�;.+g a viable tcansporration system.
aeeds. Methods used to acquixe and pxeserve right-
TR-57: Develop and,maintain xegulations, of-way include:
which fostec a balance between meeting the ■ Req"'�dedicarion of right-of-wayas a
need fot public pasking and ensuring condition of development;
developeis pzovide adequate pazking to
meet the demand generated by new ° P��liasl°S nght-of-way at fau market
development. value;and
TR-58: In certain cases, such as in the � Acquiruig development rights and
Regional Growth Centes and in axeas with easements from pzoperty owness.
Chapter 5.Po/iiru Page 5-8
���F .'-�°�� :� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�� �_ _ " " -
� � WASHWGTON
TR-62: PLesexve.and pzotect existing right- TR-69: The City maintains the option of '
of-way through the issuance of permits such closing stceets when freezing conditions are
as ROW Use peanits and franckuse and ptesent to pseveat frost damage.
public way agxeements, by monitoring and
responding to right-of-way encsoachments
and safety impacts, and by limiring vacafions I
of public right-of-way.
TR-63: Vacate right-of-way. only when it
rlParly will not be a future need or to _�,s,_,
support economic development - --"
� '- ';,�' -_-
OBJECTIYE: MAINTENANCE
AND PRESERVATION �,:~r�'�-�"' =";"��'��
To maintain the City's transportation system "�;
at a level that is comparable with the design .��4 •
�
standards applied to new fadlities.
PoLiciES Save Ou�Streets - Patching Treatment
TR-64: Establish progcams and schedules
fox the level and frequency of zoaddvay and
non-motorized system maintenance.
TR-65: In ozder to help ensuce the long ,.\�-y;e j
term pteservation of the dty street system, "' •- --' �
the City prol�ibits lieavy vehicles that exceed ;r.��a"`�" -'� .�
�-': _
��. ,t±i.L.
lawful load limits for state hig6ways from ;; ;_.r„
tcaveling on dty stxeets, ualess the Ciry ��f;�°� +'`"`� ,
� �, .�x..�,�..
pemuts such travel via the issuance of a ;;.c�;`r'�" ,�.,�;^
temporuy haul pexmit that xequixes ``.,. `'":�5,•"•,`.°�<
appxopriate xnitigarion. Save Our Streets - Overlay
TR-66: Establish standazds of stceet repaix
and seek to obtain suffident financing co rJ.2 Street System
attaia and maintain a safe system in good
condiuon. OBJECTIVE: FUNCTIONAL
TR-67: Contiaue to implemeat the "Save C LAS S 1 FI CAT I O N
Out Streets" ptogram foz maintenance and To provide an integrated street network of
rehabilirarion of local sueers. appropriate classes of streets designed to
facilitate different types of traffic flows and
TR-68: Czeate an arterial streers access needs.
maintenance and xehabilitatiori pzogsam,
including development of an Po�CIES:
� implementation timeliae. and suategy, foi TR-70: The ciry stceet system is made up of
atterial and collectox streets in Aubiui►. thzee classes of srteets:
Chapter S.PoGezer Aage S-9
*,e
���F '-- = -:, Comprehensive Transportation Plan
AU$URN
�-- - WASHINGTON
a. Arterials - a system of city, counry, and additional right-of-way should be obtained
state streeu designed to move traffic to ox in otdex to realize the improvement
from major traffic and activity genesatots. Preseroation of neighborhood continuity
Ar[erials should be adequate in number, and cohesiveness will be respected
appxopxiately situated, and designed to TR-75: The standazds fox xesidential stceeu
accommodate modexate to high traffic may be modified in ctoss section to provide
volumes with a miniinum of flow bettex xelatiousiups between the diffecent
disruption. components of the street including, but not
b. Collectors - a system of city streets that limited to, on-srteet pazking, the ]andscape
collect traffic and move it from the local strip, and the sidewalk. Among othet
street system to the arterial street system. objectives, this may be done to balance the
c. I.ocal sueets - a system of city streets, need to pxovide adequate puking and buffex
which collect traffic from individual sites pedestrians imm txaffic.
and conveys the traffic to the collectox and TR-76: These minimlyny standazds do not
arterial systems. limit or pzevent developecs from providing
TR-7L• The Functional Roadway facilities that exceed the City's standazds.
Classifications Map will sezve as the adopted OBJECTIVE: ARTERIALS
standazd for identifying classified sueets in
the Ciry of Aubum and rhe potenrial To provide an efficient arterial street netwark.
anuexation azeas. POLICIES:
TR-72: Ensure all streets classified iu the TR-77: The City has two classes of arterials,
Comprehensive Transportation Plan aze as follows.
fedetally classified.
a. Principal ArteriaLs coavey txaffic along
TR-73: Stxeet standazds shall be developed, commercial oz industoal activities, and
modified, and implemented that reflect the provide access to freeways. They emphasize
slseet classification system and function. mobiliry and de-emphasize access to
The design and management of the sueet adjacent laud uses. Principal azterial streets
network shall seek to impiove the aze typically constructed to accommodate
appeazance of eicisting street comdozs. five lanes of traffic.
Streets aze cecognized as an importaut
component of the public spaces within the
City and should include, whexe appxopriate,
landscaping to enl�ance the appeazance of
city street cotridozs. The standazds should
include provisions fox streetscaping.
TR-74: The classification standazds adopted
in the Auburn Engineering De.�gn Standanlr aze �"
considered the City�s m;n;mum standazds
fot new streeu. In cases in wluch the Ciry
attempts to xebuild an existing stceet cvithin
an established right-of-way, the City Council
resetves the authority to detemune if prjp[lpalArt2/ial.' ISthStB2tNW
Chapler5.Poliiiu Page 5-10
���F =�'°� :� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
i''�� � �� � ' ~
WASHINGTON
b. Minoz Artezials convey t�affic onto Residential Collectois, Type I and Noa-
prinapal arterials from collectoz aad local Resideatial Collector streets.
stceeu. They place slighdy more emphasis TR-81: Encourage King and Pierce counties
on ]and access aad offex a lowex level of to develop and implement a siinila= system
mobiliry than priadpal arterials. Minoz of collectoz designations within Aubum s
actetial streets aze typically consuvcted to potential annexation azea.
accommodate fout lanes of txaffic.
TR-82: Designate new collectors to setve
TR-78: Encourdge King aad Piecce counties developing azeas concurxent with appmval
to develop and implement a similar system of such deyelopment. Collectois shall be
of axterial designatious withici Aubum's spaced in compliance with good
potential annexation azea. �nsportation network planning principles,
TR-79: Designate new arterials to serve and' support the importance of ovesall
developing azeas concurxent ivitli ajiproval system circulation.
of such development Aiterials shall be
spaced in compliance with good OBJECTIVE: LOCAL STREETS
transportadon network planning prindples, To provide an effective street system for local
and support the imporrance of overall traffic while maintaining community access.
system circulaaon. P���:
OBJECTIVE: COLLECTORS TR-83: The local street system is coingxised
To provide an efficient cbllector street of a11 �oadway facilides noc part of rhe
network, which transitions traffic from the lughec classification sysc«n and is designed
IoCal Street network to the arterial street to pxovide d'uect access between abutting
System. land nses and the collectoi/aiteval systems.
The local stxeet types are as follows:
POLICIES:
a. Local Residential Streets, Type I sexve
TR-80: The Citp has thxee classes of p��y residential azeas.
collectozs as follows:
a. Residential Collectois, Type I ace used to b' I'O� Non-Residential Sueets seive
connect local stxeets and usidential P��y �dusisial and manufacturing land
uses.
neaghboxhoods to community acdvity
centeis and minoi and prinapal aiterials. c. I.ocal Residential Scceets, Type II pxovide
access to xesidential azeas that tend to have
b. Non-Residential Collectozs conaect non- less intensive land uses.
zesidential azeas such as industrial and
commescial azeas to minox and prindpal d Private Sueets aze privately owned by the
��s. . coxnmunities they setve and aze only
permitted under the guidance outlined in the
c Residential Collectozs, Type II aze routes private Streets Objective and supporting
that connect tesidential neighborhoods with �Policies..
less intensive land uses to activity centets,
regazdless of trafficvolume. Tliey ate ofren TR-84t Access Tracts may be permitted, as
conslructed to a lesser standazd than long as emexgency access can be guazanteed
at all times.
Chapter S. PoGcier PQg°S"»
CRYOF� -•...�'"� Comprehensive Transportafion Plan. �
AU�=LJRN --
,%�—� WASHINGTON
TR-85: The local street network shall be tegulated by city code and the Auburn
developed to c�4+**++>e the efficiency of rhe EnBimeering Detign Standarda•. �
transportarion netwoik in residential azeas TR-87: If a private srteet is pemutted; it
and m;.,;m;�e thzough traffic in must be built to public stceet standazds as
neighbozhoods. identified in the Auburn Engimeering Derigit
" The intemal local iesidential street Standarrlr and Con.rtruction Standardr manuals.
netwoxk foz a subdivisioa should be TR-88: Private streets must provide for
designed to discoucage tegional duough emetgenry velucle access and be pxiva[ely
txaffic and non-xesidential traffic from maintained by an appzoved ass,ociation ox
penetcating the subdivision ot adjacent business. The City does not maintain
subdivisions. private stceets.
" Whese possible, streets shall be planned,
designedandconsmxctedtoconnectto OBJECTIVE: ACCESS
futute development MANAGEMENT
■ When applicable,non-motorized parhs To limit and provide access to the street
shall be provided at the end of dead end network in a manner which improves and
streeu to shocten waiking disrances co an maintains public safety and roadway capacity.
adjacent arteiial oz public facilides PpLICIES:
including,but not limited to, schools and
P�, TR-89: Seek consolidation of access poinu
■ Residential developments.should be to state highways, artetials, and collectors.
plauned ina manner that m;.,i,,,i�es the T�s will benefit the lvghway and city street
number of local street accesses to system, reduce intezfexence with traffic
azteriaLs and collectois. flows on arteriaLs, and discoucage tkuough
traffic on local streets. To achieve tbis level
° To promote efficient connectivity of access conteol, the City:
between azeas of the community,
existing stub end sueets shall be linked ° Adopts and supports the State's
to othet stceets in new development con[colled access policy on all state
whenevex the oppoztunity axises and the highway facilities;
tesulting tcaffic volumes aze not likely to � Mayacquixe access rights along some
exceed acceptable volumes as idmtified arterials aud collectois;
in the Aubxrn Engineenng Derign Standardc o Adopts design standaxds that identify
OBJECTIVE: PRIVATE STREETS accessstandar3sfoteachtypeof
funcaonal stzeet classification;
To discourage the development of private . Encoutages consolidation of access in
streets and ensure, if they are permitted by developing commercial and high densiry
the City, they are'constructed and maintained =esidential azeas thzotigk shazed'use of
according to City standards.
driveways and local access streets;and
' POLICIES: ■ Will establish standazds fox access
' TR-86: Private streets aze discoureged, but management,develop a planning pzocess
may be permitted on a disaetionaxy basis, as to work with the community and
ChapterS.Poli<ier Page S- 72
���F "-� :; Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�s �
-a� � WASHINGTON
ssnplement access management solutions TR-96: The traffic calming pzogiam shall
on arterial coaidors. incorpoiate neighborhood involvement aad
TR-90:.Strive to pzevent negaave impacts to seek communiry support
exisring businesses,without compzomising TR-97s New constsuction should
safety,when implementing access incorpoxate tcaffic calmll]g measufes, as
manaa+.ment. appropti3te.
OBJECTIVE: THROUGH TRAFFIC OBJECTIVE: FREIGHT
To accommodate through traffic in the �ry as MOVEMENTS
efficiently as possi6le, with a m'inimum of To facilitate the movements of freight and
disruption to neighborFioods. goods th�ough Auburn with minimal adverse
Porsc�s: trafficand other environmental impacts.
TR-91: Continue to cooxdinate with the Pot.ICIES:
Washington State Depaztment of TR-98: The movement of freight and goods
Tzanspoxtaaon to facilitate the movement of � re�o�� as an important component of
traffic thxough the City. Aubum's fzansportation,system.
TR-92: Encouxage the State and Counties to TR-99: The movement of fieight and goods
develop tluough toutes, WIi1C11 minimi�e�e which 'sesve laxgely national, state, oi
impact of tluough traffic on Aubucn s =egional needs should take place in such a
zesideatial'neighboihoods. way so that the impacts on the local
TR-93: Acrively solicit action by the Stxte transportanon system aze m;n;m;zed. These
and Counties to pmgraw and coastrud movements should take place primarily on
those impzovemeats needed to serve state highways, Intecstates, or on. gxade-
Anbum to the state and county artecial and sepazated rail cortidozs in ordes to m;n;**++�e
freeway systems. the local impacts.
TR-100: Seek public and private pazmets to
OBJECTIVE: TRAFFIC CALMING leverage fiinds fox freight impxovement
To employ traffic calming techniques to pzojecrs and associated mitigarion.
improve safety and neighborhood quality. TR-lOL• Conanue co work wirh rhe F�eighc
PoL[ccES: Mobility Roundtable, FAST, FMSIB, and
TR-94: Implement the City's tcaffic calming othes local and iegional gioups to ensuxe
program to impcove neighborhood safety �onal needs are met,and local impacts aze
and quality.
mitiigated
TR-95: The uaffic calming progxam shall TR-10.2: All thtough truck trips and the
requiie a technical analysis of existing �jority of local tdps shall take place on
conditions and apptopriate tceatments desi8°ated truck coutes, as identified on the
befoxe acrions aze taken to fund and �� ioute map, Figure 2-7, of' the
implement tcaffic calming measuces. Coinprehenrive Tran,portation Plan. This policy
shall aot apply to developments aad uses
opetating under existing right-of-way use
peTmits, teaffic tnitigation agxeemeats ox .
Chapter S.Po6cier Page 5-13
���F :�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
�A_,,sU��7RN
/ --�� WASHWGTON
equivalent agteements dixectly telated to the
tegulationofperauttedhaulroutes. OBJECTIVE: LATECOMER
TR-103: If the City is unable xo acquixe P O L I C Y
funding to maintain existing c�uck routes to To enable private investors to recover a
a Pavemenc Condirion Index Standazd of 70 portion of improvement costs for
on a segment of roadway, that xoute tnay be transportation facility improvements that
xestricced oz closed to cruck travel. benefit other developments.
TR-104: Work towazds deSlgIIlIIg and POLiC1ES:
constructing fimue truck coutes, as TR-109: The City may entex into ]atecom�
identified on the uuck xoute map in Chapter agreements where substantial transportation.
2 of the Compiehensive Tsansportation invesunents aze made bp one party that
Plan,to sustain routine truck traffic. legitimately should be xeimbursed by otheis,
TR-105: Local truck trips that have origins such as, when the infzastcuctuce
and/or destinatioas in Aubum may have to �p=ovement will benefit a futuce
sometimes use routes not designated as development. Such agxeements will be at
tcuck soutes. The City may approve the use �e disaetion of the City Council.
of alternate xoutes not cuizendy designated Latecomes agxeements do not apply to ,
as tcuck toutes for truck uaffic, with situations in which a ptopetity ownex is
appzopriate midgation. Appioval xnay be requiied to construct impmvements pes an
made through issuance of right-of-way use existing aty code piovision, such as.in the
permits, teaffic mitigadon agteements ox case of half-street and othax' fcontage
equivalent agxeements. impzovements.
TR-106: Development shall be required to OBJECTIVE: ROUNDABOUTS
mirigate the impacts of construcaon To seek air quality, safety, and capacity
generared u,�ck ccaffic on che City's benefits by promoting the use oP
cransporrauon system, based on rhe Ciry's roundabouts over traffic signals.
LOS standard.
POLICIES:
TR-107: Temporazy haul xoutes fox
overvveight or ovessized velucles shall be TR-110: Intessections contcolled with
pennitted undex circumstances acceptable to zoundabouu aze pxefeaed ovet signalized
the City and with appropriate mitigation. A intexsecdons whenever feasible ancl
tempoxazy haul pemiit must be obrained appropxiate due to the benefits achieved
prioz to the hauling of oversized oi �� zoundabouts induding Leduced
oveiweight freight. collision rete for velucles and pedestriaus,
less sevete collisions, smoothex traffic flow;
TR-108: Truck traffic in residential =educed vehide emissions and fuel
neighborhoods shall be prolubited, except �onsumpdon, lowex long-texm maiutenance
for local delivexies within said costs,and improveii aesthetics.
neighborhood,, unless no othez possible
route is available, in which case mitigation TR-111: Developments requiced to si�nali�e
may be xequired. an intezsecdon as mitigatiom for a pzoject
may be xequiued to install a ioundabout
instead of a traffic signal. The'feasibility of
Chaptn5.Po/iore.r Page S->4
`"` Comprehensive Transportation Plan
cmoe �% ��+
`�U�`�7�RN
' WASHINGTON
acquiriag the ]and needed foz a xoundabout Tzansportation planning shall seek to allow
will be considesed as a factor in this pedestrians and bicyclists rhe ability to cross
xequirement. oz avoid bazriets in a mannec that is safe aad
convenient
rJ.3 Non-motorized System TR-1]5: Acavely seek to acquire land along
OBJECTIVE: PLANNING THE �orridozs identified foz funue ttail
NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM development in the Comp�ehe�uive
Tran.rportation Plan and Auburn Park.r,
To plan a coordinated, irrterconnected ge�,ration, dr Open Spa�r Plan 2005 and
network of non-motorized transportation subsequenc Park plaus.
facilities that effectively prOVide aCCess to TR-116: Schedule, plan and co-sponsor
local and regional destinations, improve
overall qualiry of life, and support healthy e°eat� that support tecreaaonal walking and
community and environmental principles. bicycling. These eveats should emphasize
theix recceational and health values and
PoLICIES: inttoduce people to the uansportation
TR-1]2: Implement land use tegulations and �apabilities of bicycling and wallang.
encoutage site design that pzomotes non- TR-117: Impiove and pxotect the non-
motorized foxms of transpoxtation. motorized transportation system tluough
TR-1]3: Include the tole of non-motoxized �e establishment of level-of-service goals
transpoxtation in all transportation planning, for non-motorized facilities.
progxamming, and if suitable, capital
impiovementpmjects. OBJECTIVE: DEVELOPING THE
NON-AAOTORIZED SYSTEM
To build a safe, attractive, and inter-
connected non-motorized transportation
system.
�
�
i POLICIES:
TR-118: Develop and maintain the non-
motorized system, including bike zoutes,
walkways and equestrian paths, to encoucage
significant recteational use.
TR-119: Develop and maintain the non-
motorized system, inclucling bike coutes,
sidewalks, and multi-use paths in a manner
that piomotes non-motorized tracel as a
Interurban Trai!at W Main Street viable mode of ccansportation.
TR-120: Develop the non-motorized system
TR-114: Plan foz continuous non-motorized to accommodate apptopriate altemative
cuculation routes withia and between foffis of non-motorized transport, as well as
existing, new oz redeveloping commescial, medically necessazy motorized transport
zesidential, and industdal developments.
Chapter S.PoGda Page 5-15
e�RY�F -=-���° Comprehensive Transportation P.lan
.1�����'N�
J"
TR-I21: Appiopriate street fumirure, pedestrian traffic or potential and aze
lighting, signage, and landscaping should be identified in this plan. These ueas and
installed along non-motorized routes to stxeets shall encoutage pedestdan txavel liy
incsease safety and to ensure that facilides pzoviding enhanced pedestian
aze iriviting to usets. improvements or contcols on mototized
TR-722: Clearly sign and mazk majox non- �affic.
tnotorized routes to guide travelets and TR-128: Focus investments on and
impxove safety. aggtessively seek Cunding fot the high '
TR-123: Non-motorized mutes shall be priority pedestdan comdozs, identified in
constructed to accommodate emezgenry Figuce 3-2.
vehicle access and be ameuable to law TR-129: Requixe developers to incozporate
enforcement pedestdan facilities into new development
TR-124: I.ocate and design non-motorized and tedevelopment in conformance with the
transportarion systems so that they Aubum City Code.
contribute to the safety, efficienry, TR-]30: Continue to construct new and
enjopment and convenience of residential rehabilitate existing sidewalks through a
neighborhoods. sidewalk impiovement progxam.
TR-]25: The development of facilities TR-13L• Seek ways to provide p"edestrian
supporting non-motorized transportation amenities such as stxeedights, trees, seating
should be ptovided as a xegulat elemeat of azeas; signage, and public art along all majox
new constcuction piojects. Lmptovements pedesttian t�avel coutes.
shall be secured thzough the development TR-132: Wozk towazds buffeung pedestdan
teview piocess. walkways fxom moving traffic,paxEicularly in
TR-126: Minimize hazazds and obsavctions azeas with high leqels of pedestrian
on the non-motorized tcanspoztarion system movements, such as neaz schools and
by pioperly desi�ning, constructing, commercial azeas, and along cozridoxs with
managing, and mainra'� designated heavy veluculat traffic.
toutes in the system. TR-]33: Pedestrian' cxossings shall , be
O BJ E G T I V E: developed at locauons with sigaificant
PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL pedestrian traffic and designed to match
pedesuian desue]ines.
To enhance and encourage pedestrian travel -
in Auburn. TR-1i4: Encourage the formation of LIDs
to develop pedesttiau pathways aad othex
PoLICIFS: non-motorized amenities throughout the
TR-]27: Promote pedestrian travel within City. Partnet with�the local school districts
the city and connections to adjacent to imptove Safe Walking Roiites to Schobl.
communities with emphasis placed on safety
and on connectivity to priority destinadons
such as schools, parks, the downtown, and
other pedestman-oriented azeas. Pedestrian-
oriented azeas aze those azeas with high
Chapter S.Po/i�rer Page S- 16
��F "-��'� *�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan
��a � -�
WASHINGTON�
OBJECTIVE• BICYCLE TRAVEL TR 142• Develo� an Auburn�gecific l�cle
' i�.gn�,�ro�xam to hiQhliQht corridocs
To improve Aubum's biCycling network. connectois and in-d�y/out of citv
POLICIES: destinahons.
TR 1i5: Develop piograms and TR 143• Make imntovements to existing
publications, and work with local employets Inten�*ban Tsail — signao,�_gavement
to encouxage citywide bicycle comxrintiag. conc�+dons vegetation maintenance eiade
TR-136: Designate, develop, and mainhin cros`•trag�and uggrades to user facilities at
Main Stceet cxossing.
lugh priority birycle routes, in conformance
with Figute 3-4, that cxeate an TR 144• Develo� a c�ital imgxovement
interconnected system of bike facilities for �ZSS�m $S=?;P�r �;th cost estimate fox the
local and regional travel, including on-sueet desigp and construction of bicscle/�edestrian
bike zoutes,and multi-puxpose trails. �n ge ?Y cn»thrm rertninus' of M St. west of
existing Stuck River Vehicle Bridee
TR-137: During the development zeview
pmcess, ensute pzojects aze consistent with TR=145• Develop a capital im,pxovement
the Non-motorized chaptez of the gro��oroj.ect with cost ectimate for the
Comptehensive Transportation Plan by desi,g+� and constn�crion of innovadve and safe
requiring right-of-way dedications and other �e e�+Tia /b�cle aossing at M St./Aubum
improvements as needed to develop the Way South intersection.
bicycle network. TR-146• In�ta11 one or moxe bike boxes
TR-138: Focus investments on and thxough a gilot g�rog�pproach to test
aggiessively seek funding fot the high effecdveness and,�ublic resgonse Focu�lilot
priority fut�e bicycle coaidors,identified in nroeiam efforts at j�gy inrersections such as
Figtue 3�} and co**idors and connectois as the West Main Street and C Street
�gplicable s.�ecified in Figure 3-5. �+?±P*�PCrinn_ rhe M Street and Aubum Was
SouLh intersection and the Ellingson Road and
TR-139: Encourage rhe lnclixsion of A Srseet intessection.
conveaient and secuxe bicycle storage
facilides in all ]azge public and private TR-147• Install bicycle/nedesuian crossing
developments. �g...�stems a1_ong Interurban Tzail at all
ctossin�locations consisting of 277 Street
TR 140• Develo}� and imolement Shartows 37'" St NW West Main Street and 15`� Strcet
and associated Shue the Road-sig�g� �
xesidential and some non-residential aieas of
r:... �'., +P�r eFFP h1 PTIPCC a.,d ovezall gnblic TR-148: Develo� an offici�l Auburn Bi�yclinQ
�ps onse the im�lementation of a Shanows Guide Mao.
f�n�m �ih associated Share� �he Road '],'R-149• In cooxdinadon with the Citv
s�¢ti�e should be utit�yll conduc*�d dLOUeh CouncL Ma,vox's Of£ce_ Auburn A*ea
a�oilot gzoexam. Ck�ambex of Commetce Aubum Tourism
TR 141• Continue installation of liike lanes in Board and agptouriate Ci�y degartments
�rts of ity where �here is exis�ing/adeauate �POP � stcategies and actions for the
•�ght_of wa°• imnlementation of the bic�le oriented
Cbapter5.Pokuu Page 5- 17
�RY�F °-�'��%� Comprehensive Transportation Plan.
�����
i°�---� WASHINGTON �
economic develo$ment zecommendations of achieve Aubum's tcansit and passenger-zail
the Auburn Bicycle Task Force. objectives.
TR-144: Woxk with local and iegional transit
agencies to serve new and e�risting tdp
OBJECTIVE: genezators in Aubum, such as colleges,
EQUESTRIAN TRAVEL commercialazeas,andcoxnmuniryfaciliaes:,
To improve Auburn's equest�ian environment. TR-145: Encourage Sound T�ansit, Metro
PoI.ICIES: Tcansit, and Piesce Transit to expand transit
to unduserved azeas of Aubum.
TR-140: Stdve to incoxpozate equesuian '
facilities into the design of mnil and TR-146: Pazmet with WSDOT,Amtrak;
transportation facilities, where possible and and Sound Transit to establish an inte=city
appxopriate. These efforts should be passengex rail stop at the Aubum Station.
concenttated south of the White Rivex in TR-147: Considu both the teansit impacts
Aubum s southeast corner and in I.ea Hill, �d the opportuniaes p=esented by majoz
but considezed for other azeas of the Ciry. development pioposals when teviewing
TR-141: Txansportation pzojects, and othex development undex the State Envitonmental
public and private ptojects, in lower-density Policy Act.
neighboLhoods should be evaluated, and TR-148: Encoivage the inclusion of rtansit
wheie possible, planned, designed and facilities in new development when
conshucted to be compatible with apptopriate.
, equestrian use.
TR-149: Encoucage bus stops to be located
TR-142: Czeate an intexconnected system of at well lit azeas.
safe equestrian txails and provide adequate
equestrian amenities adjacent to those tzails. TR-150: Woik with rtansit pzoviiiers and
iegional agendes to develop a trausit system
rJ.4 Trarasit Systean �t is fully accessible to pedestrians and the
physically challenged, and which integsates
OBJECTIVE: TRANSIT the access, safery, and paxldng xequitetnents
SERVICES of bicyclists.
To encourage the continued development of TR-151: Idenrify ueas of concenr�ated
public transit systems and other altematives cxansic uaffic and impose design and
to single occupant vehicle travel, to relieve conscrucrion srandards chac accommodate
traffic congestion, to reduce reliance on the rhe unique considexarions associated wirh
automobile inr personal transportation needs, bus uavel, such as sueec geomeuy ,and
to imp�ove rbute coverage and scheduling, pedestrian linkages.
and to ensure transit is a convenient and
reliable mode option for both local and 5.5 Air Transportation
regionel trips.
TR-143: Pazmex with WSDOT, Metco OBJECTIVE:
Transit, PierceTzansit, and Sound Transit to AIR TRANSPORTATION
To provide an efficient municipal airport,
serving light general av'iation aircraft, as an
Chapter5.Palidu PagtS- 18
���F =-�'� *-, Comprehensive Transportation Plan
��1U��CT,NRN .
integral part of the Gty's transportation
system.
Po�c�s:
TR-]52: Continue to develop rhe Aubum
Municipal Aitport in accoidance with the
Aiiport Ma.rter Plan.
TR-153: The aupott shall be managed as a
geneial aviation facility; the use of jet
auciafts and helicoptexs that create noise
and land use coss£licts shall be evaluated,;in
conformance with FAA regulations.
TR-154: The siting,of new aixport facilities
shall consides neighborhood impacts such as
incseased noise genexated from the nse of
those facilides.
TR-]55: Use of the aixport by non-
conventional aiccsaft such as ultxa lighu shall
be discoutaged, in confomiance ivith FAA
tegulations.
TR-156: The City's zoning ozdinance and
othec appzopriate reglilatory measnxes shall
�� �focce the ai[j�ort clear zones as tegulated
by the Fedecal Aviadon Administcation
(FAA). The impact of development on air
safety shall be assessed through SEPA
zeview, and approptiate mirigation measuxes
shall be zequised by the City.
TR-157: Minisnize ar elitninate the
poteatially advesse effects of lip�t and glaze
on the operation of the Aubum Auport.
Chupier S.Po6ciu Pnge 5-19
Table of Cantents COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure ES1.Sub-basin drainage areas prioritized for evaluation and inventary......................................................5
Figure ES-2.Timeline for NPDES Permit compliance............................................................................................12
Figure 2-1. Public Works Departrnent staff organizational chart...........................................................................2-3
Figure 4-1. Natural drain�qe features of the city of Aubum.................................................................................4-15
Figure 4-2. Drainage sub-basins for the Aubum stormwater u61ity......................................................................417
Figure 4-3.Surface geology in ihe vicinity of the Aubum stortnwater utility........................................................419
Figure 4-4. Hydrologic soil groups for soils in the vicinity of the Aubum stormwater utility..................................421
Figure 45. Land use designations for the city of Aubum(Comp Plan, 2008).....................................................423
Figure 4-6. Sub-basin priorities for system inventory..........................................................................................4-25
Figure 4-7. Drainage infrasVucture for the Aubum stormwater utility..................................................................427
Figure 4-8. City and stortn drainage critical facilities for the city of Aubum.........................................................429
Figure 4-9. Observed drainage problem locations for the Aubum stormwater utility...........................................4-31
Figure 4-10. City of Aubum downtown area and urban center............................................................................433
Figure 5-1. Example of annualized cost of ownership with minimum highlighted in red(age 23).........................5-6
Figure 6-1. Project locations,stortnwater utility Capital Improvement Pragram....................................................6-3
Figure&2. Proposed capital improvements at Aubum Way S pump staGon, Phase 1 (CIP Project 11A)..........6-11
Figure 6-3. Proposed bypass piping at 2nd and G SVeets(CIP Project 12).......................................................6-17
Figure 6-4.Proposed caoital imorovements to relieve floodinp at 30th Street NE(CIP Proiect 13A.
136. and 13C1............................................................................................................................. 6-21
2nd1�@.......................................................................................................................................�2�
Figure 6-5. Proposed capital improvemenTs at West Main Street(CIP Project 14).............................................6-25
Figure 6-6. Proposed capital improvements at 2961h Street pond in West Hill area(CIP Project 15A and B)....&29
Figure 6-7. Proposed capital improvements ffi Bry's Cove Pond in West Hill area(CIP Project 16A and B)......6-33
Figure 6-8. Future annual spending for repair and replacement given ralculated optimal timing........................6-37
Figure 6-9.Relative criticality of stortnwater drainage pipes identified for condition assessment.......................6-24
Figure 7-1.Annual costs for 6-year CIP................................................................................................................7-3
Figure 7-2.Timeline for NPDES Pertnit compliance.............................................................................................7-8
Figure 7-3. Distribution of pipe ages hased on the City's current criticality database..........................................7-10
Iv
Use of conlenls on Ihis sheet is su6ject lo Ihe limilalions speclfretl at Iha entl of Ihis document.
Ezecutive Summary _ COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PCAN
• . . � i
iipro�� i • �year,ClP,� ITafel roceU
' P1
;number :PmJectname 'Piioiity. , . 20091 ; ' 2010� 2011: 1 2012' 2013� ,7M4 ; 1015-Y028 I cobts;
1 R St.SE Storm Drain Improdement 1 $770,000 T70,000
2 SCADA(Telemetry)Upgrades 1 100,000 240,000 340,000
3 Whfle River Storm Pump Station Replacemer�,Phase 1 2 300,000 300,000
4 White River Stottn Pump Stalion Replacement,Phaze 2 2 2,200,000 2,200,000
5 Peasley Canyon Culverl Replacement 1 300,000 700,000 1,000,0(10
6 M St NFJHarvey Rd.8 Bth SL Improvements 2 1�,000 100,p00
7 Les Gove Neighbortaod Improvement 3 175,000 25,000 200,000
8 WestValleyHghway 3 1,600,OW 1,500,000
9 PortofSeffitle.MitigationAgreemeMProjecle 1 - fi00,000 . 600,000
10 M80 Facility ImprovemenGS 2 300,000 300,000
itA Relieve Aubum Way S Pboding;Phase 1 1 400,000 q0p,p0p
118 Relieve Aubum Way S Fboding;Phase 2 2 1,638,000 1,638,000
12 - Bypass a1�2nd antl�G Streets SE � 2- � 453,000 453,000
13A Relieve 30th Sl NE Area Flooding,Phase 1 1 250.000 . 2.691.000 2.947.0�
7,543,909 7;§AJ;B08
13B Relieve 30th SL NE�Area Flooding,Phase 2+ 1 75.000 595•000 - 670 000
� 9;0§4;BA0
13C Relieve 30th SL NE Area Floodina.Phase 3 1 1 1. 54.000 f.154,000
14 West Main SL Pump Upgrade 2 1,135,000 1,135,000
15A South 296th St:South PoiM Ezpansion,Phase 7 1 453,800 453,800�
158 SoWh 296th St:South Pond Ezpansion,Phase 2> � 2 1,072,000 1,072,000
16A eiys Cove Pond Expa�bn,Phese 1 2 113,000 113,000 .
168 Brys Cove Pond Expaiaion,Phese 7 2 _ _ 445,000 445,000
17 Stam Drainage InfrasWdu�e Repai�&RepacemenW 1 400,000 412,000 424,360 437.091 450,204 463,710 5,600,000 8;187,365
18 Arterial UGlity ImprovemenLs 1 200,000 206,000 212,180 216,545 225,102 231,855 1,293,682
19 SOS Utility Improvements 1 500,000 412,000 912,000
20 � Regional Drainage Improvement Projeck 3 579,637 7,000,000 7,579,631
Tdal6yearClPcostforPriaitylprojecls 62. 70.000 2.183.800 1.476.540 905.636 3447 1.290.565 6.754.000 187 7
',"� 3;4S4;8BB a;2&4,368 437;98i �1�B3,2B4 � 9;53F;T#9 G,&4A;BBB �4;IA2;165
Total6yearClPoost(orpnaity2projeds 400.000 2.313,000 3,010,000 �� 453,000 -1,135.000 445,000 - 0 7.756.000
�B �4§S;B9B
Totel&yrearClPCOStlorprioMy3projects 175 25•000 1.500.000 Q Q 579.637 7.000,000 92. 79•637
87S08B S43,B9B a;7a2;f88 2�544 225;392 833;482 ia;484,319
iotal6yearGPcost t3,245,000 54,5l1,800 � i5,986,540 51.358.638 50.582.308 E2315.202 3T 0 � f35.783.4&
Kr10�638 f3�3b2�206 �A4ti292 642�644808 i34i84t�484
a.Funds eQri,a in 201L �
6.Projed'mGudes cosls'm 6olh fAe 6yeara�M PO-yser GP.� .
ES-9
Use of mntenk on ihis sheet is su6ject lo Ne lirtutatlms spedfied at the ena ot Nis documeni.
6:Capital Impravements COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
• , . ,. ,., ,
�
P_4r jat name: Relieve�30th�St.NE Area Floodino � - � � �
Locatlon: Street floodinu in 301h SL NE between C St.NE and Aubum Wav Nodh:east of ISf.NE between 32nd St.NE and 35th St.
NE:C SLNE between 30th SC NE and 37th St.NE
Prlo� 1
Se6 ule: Phase wnshuction with Phase 1 in 2013.Phase 2 in 2014.and Phase 3 in 2015
Probtem The north central area of Aubum has a historv of surface floodino wRh sianificant floodina accurrina about once even few.
summarv: vears.The December 3.2007.-stortn evenC oroduced eMensive floodinh that included la)inundetion of 30th St. NE in the
vicinitv of C St. NE.(bl extended duration of inundation near I:St.NE adiacent to the CRISTA Minishies orocertv and Icl
floodinq_alona GSL NE ndrthward towaM.37tIi St. NE. The floodina on CSt. NE'reauired sandbaaaina ro orotect local
businesses.The floodina alona 30th Sf.NE was hiah enouah to overtoo the sidewalk near the intersection.In addition ro the
p�oblemsnotetl above.the araviri stortn drain that runs eastwarcl in 30thSt.NE to the Brannan Park Pumo Stffiion dces not
have enouah caoacitv and surcharaes fieauentiv.The surcharaina of the 30th St oioeline causes backuos in comributina
svstems, notablv the Citv AirooR and nearbv orivffie orooertv. In addition, the residential develooment east ot I SL NE
between 32nd St NE and 35t1i St NE commonlv exoerienbes orolonqed oeriods of standina waler due to hlah oround water
imoacts from the Green River on Its iM'iltration svstem.
Descriotlon: This aoied consists of seoarate uoaradas that address floodina alona 30th SL NE. C.St. NE and I St. NE. The
implememalion of these woiecls could ocaii in ohases.as fundina.staff availabilirv.and CIP oriorities allow.
Phase 1 xrould address ihe tlaoding alona 30th St. NE. This omiect would install a new stortn drain irom the northwest
come�the airooR nrooertv (MH"11071 to the existina Brannan Park'stortn oumo station: This oioe vrould reolace the
ex�tina 30-inch diameter oloe aenerallv located alona the 30th St. NE alianment and the northerlv boundarv of Brannan
Park bv imorovina the convevance svstem's hvdraulic poaciN,therebv reducinailie notential for stormwater floodina into
the sireeL The oioe would be set at a consistent slooe of 0.2 cercem.which xrould inaease flaw velocities ro heln avoid ihe
curtent omblems with slitation of the oice and standing water:Tfie or000sed oice alianment would follow the oublic riaht ot
wav until the oice tums east from I St.NE toward Brannan Park:This oortion of oioe would then be consiructed within an
sxistina stortn easement across oublic and orivate oroceM.To reduce construdion imoacts to orivate orooerties towards
the east end of the uroiect ttie oioe muld be located entirelv within Brannan Park.to the noRh of the oark's ball fields Some
tree removal mav be necessarv for construdion within the oark.Kev comoonents include:
• 3.820 feet of 42-in.-diameter,araviN srorm drain from the NW comer of airooA orocertv ro the existina Brannan Park stortn
rlumo station
• Removal of tloatable poNre baffles uostream of the Brannan Park oumo station (these are not needed to orotect the
oumos and reduce the svstem's'.hvdraulic raoaciNl -
Phase 2 would address the Floodina adiacent to I SL NE.This orolecl would locate a sMrtn drain line to caoture stormwater
fromshe iwo resideirtial develooments at Me west edae for ttie former CRISTA Mlnistries oroceM.Curtentiv. stormwater
Nows are di�charaed onto a deoressed area on Me CRISTA Mloislries nroceAv where its ir�ltralion Is limited bv hiah
qroundwater IevelsthaP occur durina eMended oeriods of hiah flows on the Green River.The storm water oonds within the
Qarkina of the two residential develooments and oresents a nuisance'and ootential hazard ro local residents. This ohase
would construIX a new storm drain within f St.NE southward to connect into the uoaraded 42-inch diameter(Phase 11 srortn
drain near the interseclion at I ct NE and a0th St NE The 42-incti diameter line wo�ld have sufficient available caoacitv to
convev the PSt.NE Flows.Kev comoonents of Phase 2 inGude:
• 1760 feet of 15-inch diameter aravitv stortn drain
•Gatch basin and incidental aradina to coilect stortnwffier at4he uostream end of svstem
Phase 3 would address iloodina ln C SL.NE near 37th St.NE.Currentiv stormwater flows alona C St.NE are conveved and
discharaed to Mill Creek via the 37th St:NE storm convevance Iine�Deoosition of sediment within Mill Creek has raised the '
water levels within the creek and diminished the caoaciri of the araviNSVStem�in C St.NE and downstream in 37th St.NE.
This oroiect would reduce floodin6 in C St.NE bv redirectina wet uaeatBer hiah tlows southward to the 42-inch diameter
(Phase 11 starm drain in 30th St.NE.Bv redireclina the C Sl.NE drainaae into the Brannan Park svstem these Flows would
nolonaer be affected bv hioh water levels in Mill Creek.To avoid tleeoenina tlie Phase 1 araviN line(and extensive rehofits
to the Brannan Park wmo stationl.this oroiect would include a wet weather oumo stalion and force main cnnnection to 30th
SL NE. 7he uoaraded 42-Inch diametecoice!In 30th St NE would have su�cient caoacitv for these additional tlows Kev
comoonents of Phase 3 Include: -
• Wet weather oumo staUon lestimffied caoaciN of 4.5 to 7 cfsl.
• 1.730 feel of 15-inch diameter force main
• Diversion structure in C SL NE for oumo stallon
&19
Use of conlenls an Ihis sheel is su�ject lo the limitffiions specif�etl a�Ihe end of�his documenl.
6:Lapital Improvements COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DR4INAGE PLAN
This proiecl would not reauire extensive�modifications to the Brannan Park oumo�stffiion. However, uoon comoletion�dN �
staff should consider lowerina the level'settinas for oumos 4 and 5. since ttie hvdraulic imorovements will allow more
�stommrvater to reach tha oumn station.
OL S aoallsl Floodina disruotion that inundates the roadwavs to an imoassable level nomore than once everv 25 vears.(LOS Goal 21
addressetl: Floodina causina oroceM damaqe no mo2 than once everv 50 vearsYLOS Goal 31
Reeommended , p�or to imolementina this oroiect.dN staff shouid conduQ an additional review of the orivate stormwater fadlities alona
a�an the C SL NE corridor to refirie the desian caoadtv of the or000sed oumo station.
reflnemerds•
Cast esfimffie: Gravitv stortn drain:inetall 3.820 feef of 42-in.-diameter oice from airoort b Brannan Park PS................. 7 84 0
PAase 1 Subtofel line-Mem costs................................
............................................................................................... 1584 000
Contractor overhead.orofit and mobilizztion 618%of subtotal of line-Item wstsl....................................... 2 5 000
- - - — _
Washinoton State sales tax f9.5%of all above construction costsl............................................................. $178.000
_ _ _ _
Construdion continqencv(20%of all above construdion costsl...............:................................................. 9 00
Su6total construdion costs.......................................................................................................................... 2S .456.WO
Adminishation.enaineerina desian and certnittina!20°�of construdion oosts).......................................... 91000
CIP-13A IPhase 71 oroiect cost: 000
Coat estimate: GraviN stortn drain:install 1.760 feet of 15-in.diameter oice f alona l St.NE to Phase 1 stortn drainl...... 5360.000
Phase2Subtotallinaitemwsts................................................................................................................................ 368 0,000
Contractor ovarhead.oroflt and mobilization(18°h of subtotal of line-item costsl....................................... $65.000
Washinaton State sales tax(9:5%of all above construction costsl............................................................. $40.000
Conshudion continqencv(20%W all above construdion castsl................................................................. $93.000
Subtotal construction costs......................................................................:................................................... $558.000
Adminishation,enaineerina desian and nermitlina(20%oT consiNCtlon mstsl..................................:....... 112 0
CIP 13B(Phase 21 oroiect eoat �670.000
Coat estimate: Stormwffier oumo station:7-ds oumo station located C Sl.NE to the south of 37th St.NE....................... 32S 0.000
P��3 Force main:install 1.730 feef M 15-in.-diameter oice(connect to Phase 1 stortn draiN.........:................... $300.000
Subtofelline-demcosfs..................................................................................:...............................:............. $620.000
Contractor overhead.orofit and mobllization(18%of subtotal M linedtem costs)....................................... 11S 2.000
Washinaton State sales tax(9:5%of all above consWCtbn coslsl............................................................. $70.000
Conshuclion continaena(20%a(all above construction costsl................................................................. 160 00
Subtofel conshuction costs.......................................................................................................................... 3962.000
Administration.enaineerina desian and oertnittina(25%of conshuction costsl......................................... 1 2
CIP 138(Phese 31 oroleet eost S7.754.000
Total CIP 13 oroleet eost(Phases 1'.2.31 771 000
620
Use of wntenis on Ihis sheet is subjecl lo ihe limilalbns specifed a�ihe end ol lhis document .
_ _ .� _ _......_ .__ � _ . �..��:�.A .r...
,, '^ '
,�.. �
.. . 92ii�9 "' ' . . ' wu" �1
- - � . .i��.'-�� 3� - �1�� .
-- --� . . - � _._ .. r .I,s
.. . _ . . � � ' N. :;�t: �tp� �
•'^t+ n �- •�'� ��N� .�. ' � � . � �
— � � ' ��;- � ; +° P� � ,
o,
, _� — _ : . r �
',� �� ��.� �k�' .. . � - PHASE�3 , " i•� -.'a'-
�I° ry ��� " Newpumpst�tioninCStNE ,
_ ��. y'i. - �p,. � � Plew 1.7301f lorcc main in C St NE i 1.4��- - + ". ��T! � ;
. ' , v� , •��. .,
_ . , wi . . i4 � � ��� ��i
� --,y.� g' . - "- f'-J�.,���ii - . '�` l-� ��w�
� '�i.�._ _ _'�".d `,�� ' . - '. � ' .
_ i/1 .. - .. ;
- � � - _ ' — ' i . { - _ �1.� r ��/ .�±
j
�J�� -r� A i'� �` . � _�� . 'r -- �.. .�.. . / �5 ...i
- PHFSE 2: � ' y
. � ,, ' '�`��. `�� . � �f , , .. . New 1]o01f 1".�-in tlninage � i�
-�4 _a - .- -. - . - ,' pPeinISWE .P t• � , �
- :. y-
�-� �� � �i `�
u�,�„�„�a, , �
- w - �—,_ ,,
. _ �. . . .: . - -- �'�r� r . . . — -, '
- .._U ,'—� � -- � o - - . �'`` r .
¢ c
;.� _ � . . JJ / _
- � . . . I . . i15f- , c . . ��/ i , i .
o. ,,✓�c � +: �
� I �-�r.�K p r
� I . c /� �� �� .. . m` � _
' r . �. , ' ���� % � ' Q-' �` I'7' -
� ,iibla � v.o-o �_� � �� � � ,',.
s
� - ' o . q ��� � �l. ip� d _
•�2JI,Y,Ip . _ Y�_ ' _ � tt . S� "r- ,/� /f, ,
. . y � {� ' �.,�n4 / � .�
`. I _ 4 / �'" (��y,.�{ A': •
— � - . ' �. :� A R;'41� y'�
FNns=1` .c . . . ' �V �
' ' - New 3,8201f 42-in draiwge ' ' �--- �•���.� � '-�' �, .� �. . Brannan Pa�k
' - - pipe ir 30th S�NE . � � i�.• ti � '. Pump Sta6on
'- _: � . - ',, ..;� '� `•��
ti �
� U�� rie 1,.. �� �' C-1 ,i� ^ :�r .�{ 4 � �t l�� +.�
I — - . . � � t � 1 �_y, y •
1� I 1�6 �
{ � �i
,
i � : . _ .�.. .�. �r �
i ��
—` Z�l�h� ,l� ?b�tl '�__ . ��:,. } • • .�'�+
-a�e� .. . . ��;i
' I . � _ -� ,�:_r . _.,a� . __ . 3ul[li.� - - .
i i . -i ti..� _,_ � - ` .y � _ _ _ _. _ ...�,,_'_
1 ._ A-'- _ "_ _ �.) ' O ^
:�� LLI � .. - � O. [i.
. i � . .24��1 '� ,1 t � ,. .. /
- . . . I . A .r���. } /a.,
' .� ,�i . . . \ .. � . / S.
- , . .Ill . � .
. . . � �� ����' . �U7�. � �.'�,
I " �.. ZJfI) b� � . �.� � •�._ . h. � .
�
�. IJ��. . l:r. ���_-� .
� � .
�� �.
� � ��
�I - . . ... . .
. . L• . � .. Y � �
5
. �I ..li� _ . W:'�` `
��
. _. . .. . . . �_.
�� . I � . . " - •'y,� � _
. �. � - ; .. ' -— . - � " • J LEGEND
. � y, ,is�^_ I .._� '� � �. � � Proposed Pump Station
i , � -_ . . � lis�
�+}� " ' - � � 0 Existing Pump Station
',' '_.y - `._ -� � . .- .
� J I� - � . � — Proposed Drainage Pipe
� ��" 't�i� � 2�in, �
- . , -- - ' � - '� iai��� - � - — Proposed Force Main
� ' - � '- � � . � � � - --��� " " — Existing Drainage Pipe
. � ... -. �i�tr� � -� . , . �
�nu, i"-,>-ni,s�o t. Pond
� — , i�u� F
1 — q _
� '�. ��il:�ii�c��i, ,�; � I�ti�. . . �- Projectwillrelievefloodingto
i o� � � - I Gih .'� meet LOS#2 goal
� �;` - � o.._I,51h�'� � ?... ,*� - (25-yrflowcapacity).
�.::
COMPREHENSNE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
December2009(RevisedJuly20ii� , . FIGURE6-4
� ii:oi .
c x:��.. ��u�, � A 7� �� PROJECT 13: RELIEVE 30TH ST.NE
�r. t1UBUi\1V AREAFLOODING
���.,n�,�m�,.eei N wa.ri�.rrnn�
1' .-A� �IIVH��u4al�� AI I�Inc9��.lYV .l�^r]'i'.'ul l n �-IialJn,. I .� >�.,..�J �AA+ t ..., .:.flVli � i,�.l
.� . � � � • •" ' �"
Proieei-numbeF �3Ar.g",D��"`"`�'rvescfibed-}oint!f�)
... . .._.. _ _. . .. . .. � . ..
.. . . . ... .. . .. . . . ... . . . .-:
� - - � - - - �- �� - - - - -�-- - -. .
. .. ... . ... . . . ..
. .. , ..�. . .. . . .. �.. ._ ..... .. .... . .. . .. .. . ... .�:..
. . ... . . . . .. .. .. . . .... . ... . . . - - - -
..... . . .. ,... .. .. . .. .. ... .. .. . ... ._ . . .. . . . .. �... ..
- - ' � - ` - - - -�- - - - ... .. .. ..... . . . . .� --- -.... _ ... .
. . . ... . . . . . . .. . .... . . . . .. . . . . _
. ... . . . . . .
. . ... . ... .. . .. . .. . .... . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. . .... . .,.
..- . . .. ....- - - � - - -- � - --. . .. . .. _ - - �- � -
... . . . . . . . .. . . . .. . ... .. . .. ..... .... . .. .... . ..... ... . ... .. . . ..
.. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .... ... ... ..... ... . . . . . . .. . . . .. . ,.. ....
- - .. .. . . . .. .. . . .. ..__... . .. - �- - � - -� - -
� - - - - ..
.. ._ . ... _ .... . . _. ._ .. . ..... ... .... .... .. .. .. .. ... _....._.
.. ..... . . ... . ..... ... . . ._ . . . . . . .. .. . .- --.. .. .. . . ..... .
-� . . . ... .. .. . ... . . . _. .. . . .. .. . . .. . - - - - � �-� -
... .
. ..... ....... .. _.... ._ . ... .. . .... . .. .. .. _. .. _. .... .. ,... ..
--- -� .. . . . . .. .... .... . . . . .... ..... . .. .. .. . . ... . ..
-- - � - - � - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -� - - �--- .. ... . . . . . . . - -- . . .. .
•- -- - '... .. . .. ... ... ... . . . . .......... . .. .. . .
. . .. . ... ... .. .. .. . . .. .... .. . ... .. ....... . . .. .. . :... ....... . . . .
. . . ... .. . . . . .. . ... . .. - � -•- �-� - - - ..
- -. . . .._ . , .
. . . . .... . . ._ .. ... .. .. .. ... ... .._ . �... .. . ...
. .. . ... . .. . . ... .. . .... . . . .. . . .. . . . .
. . .. . . .. .....
. .. ... .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . �--- .. . --- � -- - - ..
. .. . . - - --.. .. .. . _ . . - - - . . .. . --� - - � - �- - -' -- - -
.. .... .-�- - - ._ . . .... .. . .. .. . .... .. .. . .. .. .. . ._ _ . ..
. . .. .. .. . .. . . . . . .. . ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . .
... .. . - - -' - -• --
.. - -- . �.. . .... . . ... . . .. . . . . ... .... ..
. . . . ._ . .. ..... ... .... . .... .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. . .. . .. ....
. ...... . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . - - --- - � - -. . . . .
. .... .. .. . .. :. .. . . _ . ... . . . . . . .
.... .... .... . .. . .. .. :... �._.. . _. ... . .- � - -..... .
-- - - -- - --' -
— . . .. . . . . .. . .
'- - - � - -. �__. .. . . . ... ... .. . .. .- -- -
.. . . . .... . .. ..... ... .... . . .. ... . ..... _ .. . .. . .. ... .. ..--
.. .. .. . --� - -. .. .. . .. . . .. ... . . . . . . ... ... . . � � - . ..
.. . . . .... . . . .. .. .. . ..... . .. . . . . ... .. . . . .. ... .. ._ . ..
- - -� � .. . . . .. . . . . . .. ... . . ... . ..... . . ... .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . ..
auo �s ,� �.�� cni. n �,cF !. i.
6:Capihal lmprovements COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
��eraeMe'-6e�Belex�
�1�
a�ee�
Aeaomn�enaea
9reAesi9n -
�;
�
6esEeeNxeaEe; C�#a3n9 stertnM�Eer�=add�"�tr�exiF".^--°a 87AA�9A9
................................................................
� ' '' ' ' ............................. 829;9A9
63nrt�e�in�3nd saEe re5feraHen....................................................................................................................... $4BA;9B
Sa�tflte!li�te A2m sestc..........:........................................................................................................................... 8829,B9A
. S34B-0W
� �
.................................................................. SB2;9A9
....................................................................... 82a4;BAB
ia�.F�.Nr./.......4...Af.........A� PI OOC II/1If
................................................................................................................................ ��iCOOioeo
. . ". . . .. . .� p�����
� ............................................... Rmvi Ov
. �p������
�BU�i : . ................................... 0�'�900
� r�sfl�ii{�$�� ..i1G�:n A: , . . . . . ................................................ P�wvw
SdO1tTO1'I�R��WR�...................................................................................................................................... OTiOVTi9Oo
•• • • • VIOPOOV
i i
................................................................ �
. . . . . . . ....................................................................... �
I'J.�M��MIn..nM..��Nl......r�nM ........................................ 01SOPOOV
. . . . � . . . . . 0�00
r ............................................... ��CC.^^^
W�
�
��{�� ..--..�, ... .. . . . �
.�Y..v��
I
��
Use of contenis on ihis shee�a subject to Ihe limilations 5pecif�e0 al the entl ol lhis Eocument
I
i ---�---- . . — _ , :
� t — _- , , n .*=
L1
�� i �` '� j� � . PHASE 1
F y
I �,� � —"'i� ��.'F U l t�pmid�u.clin,C cinrnnralrr pnf�d �20 nui Jcrl
J [ 'r. � �...+__ .. 2i hopine� pnnd oud t.wrncnur
r � � .� -.
1 �� v Lun i�caping and silc n slorn�iun
IH,I�li2
lOtli_� v� A�r�� lSelr/,rrny :tali��n �
"� '.� . � - _3JIh � � � , / �A�rti l,0l10�uiU. /-A-in Jitm�r/�r J��rrr nnii
- � _ I j 1�
i -
. ' , �- w„� � �;, , ; ' ,
..- ,. ,
w�• _. _—z i �- -
_ �r----- � � . . - .. , . -�-•_
G � - �. �
.'�.,y4 _—. � ( - � .. t���'
..
_
° n ���7'� � . .... . �: .. .- ` _ ' .. �IY'
'1
'f( ' . . i �' ' U J:l��( __ . 1 ��•�� '� .
>� j � _� -r. .� .�� Nv �� f .�• 1
. � '�' iAr � 1 � . ~
� ` i . c
- - . . . �(' . � Fa -1� l,n�:F� ; l� �.
� .LJ � � I Minisales Pr erty �'� ��, �i �
Unnamed'. _ . � .
' __ '. ' _ , - � I . ��- � I ��� ."_ �
:F � � � ' " _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �_ � 1 N�
: ii -.�_ - . '.— -. . _ �
— _... i�
— - - -
� - - �'.` ExpandPond
� �ir� 4�1-i
i _ _ i -' — / +20 acre fe�et
" t` — _ - - _. _ _ _ / *newo�'itst-���.i,:,
--3o;n� !
� � � ..---
29th, � `. .__ .__._ _ . __ . r.. � . . _
.. �.- . i '" � - ..
J� �I I �_
'� � - New Pump Station �
�Y _ A � i� � I Brannan ParF �
�i ! �Pump Gtahon ��
,�_ ' �� - ; r ..,
� � � �.
m� " _ i�� �.�.�:,,.i -. I , �j�� ', '+.�R�4�� '"� � '�'+,'r.�� i
(�� `
i{1 � i . — I�_ � , �y .1. µ 1.
A I � ~ M1
� �I''."_ � �Z�llh' `I�l._ �� 'A � , . j�
��� ' — "-'�_ <: - �oan,_ -
P �� I � �; _ . �
._ L -� --
�> > :
i i- , o — , -�^ g. - a_ �
�: i � ,,
`- �►-. •....
� _ r� _._. � ' ,. /�' .. , tiM;:,, w,r
I .. X : � _ �`3 , .•,,
��.� �L3i d
�• � .: `. ��f- f°�--� � . LEGEND
i. 1
� � __A�
' �' I � �,_ � Proposed New Pu Station .,
t• ' ' -
.—�y T � ,���� �—��� � Existing Pump Station
' - � I � Storm Drain(NOde)
__ `}w 1.
� � �� — SYorm �rain (Plpe) s�
. . - -- . 1- ;; ; ', Pond
� - '
��t--,-.,` I - '�yij, . �"._ Primary benefit area: Project will reh ve 9ooding
� � .. r _ �� ��.i� — to meet LOS#2 goal (25-yr flow capa �y).
L � Secondary benefit area: Project will redu. severity
l 1 ��rc. i � —� .
�,_ � `� � � � � : � - and duration of flooding 6ut not ro meet LO #2 goal. j
�:;th ; :� - - � i5na�.-.? -
� COP:IPR . 11-NSP:'1= STOFMWATER DRAINAGE P�AN
i�ecen :.- 2oa5 , . FIGURE6-4
e
sco u suu ��'���"� � AUBURN PROJEGTI3: RELIEVE FLOOD G
=Pe� AT 30TH STREET NE
� ' i�������=��aooi��ei N �:.�,iuncin.
i _- . �� , . .�..nUhV t [� -cvP'.,r.l ��an�,�.y, F....;d�Vr.iv-.i - _— — — — —
7:Implementation Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER ORAINAGE PCAN
.� • . • . �
'ProJectnumber,. iPmJee[name Priorily,t , 'Y009i i 2070 , Y017! ' 2012 ' �2013 `2014 6-year;projectcodt�.
�1 �� R SL SE Strnm Drain Improvement 1 5770,000 E770,000
2 SCADA(Telemetry)Upgrades 1 100,000 240,000 340,00p
3 WhRe RNer Srortn Pump Statlon Replacement Phase 1 2� 300,000 300,000
4 White River Slorm Pump Sfa6on Replacement,Phase 2 2 2,200,000 2,200,000
5 Peasky Canyon CuNert Replacertient 1 300,0� 700,0011 1,000,000
6 M SL NEMarvey Rd.&8ih SL Imp�oveme�fs 2 100,000 100,000
7 Les Gove Neighborhood Improvement 3 175,000 25,000 200,0�
8 WestValleyHighway 3 1,500,000 1,500,000
9 Port ot Seattle MNgation Agreement Projech 1 600,000 600,000
10 M&0 Faa7Ay Improvements 2 300,000 300,000
11A Relieve Aubum Way S Fboding,Phase 1 1 400,000 400,000
11 B Relieve Autwm Way S Fbodirig.Phase 2 2 1,638,000 1,638,000
12 Bypass et 2�and G Streets SE�. 2 453,000 � 453,000
13A Relieve 30th SL NE Area Flooding;Phase 1 1 250 000 2.697.000 2.947.000
3;443,8BB 1;§42;9A9
-138 Rel'reve 301h SL'NE Area Fbodimj;Phase 2+ 1 75 000 595.OW 670 000
. . . �B54,BBB 3;B549B9
1�C Relieve 301h SL NE Area Floadina.Phase 3� 1 0
14 West Main SL Pump Upgrade 2 1,135,000 1;135,000
15A Sou�h 296th St South Prnd Expansion,Phase 1 1 453,800 -453,800
158 South 296th St.SoNA Pmd Expansion,Phase 2 2 1,072,000 1,W2,000.
16A Biys Cove Pond Fxparaion,Phase 1 2 113,000 113.000
16B Biys Coue Pond Ecpansron,Phase 2 2 445,000 445,000
17 Sro�m Drainage Infrastructure Repair&ReplacemenM 1 900,000 412,000 424,360 437,091 450,204 463,710 2,581,365
18 . . .ArterialPteservetionUtilitylmprovements 13 200,000 206,000 212,180 278,545 225,102 231,855 1,293,fi82
19 SOS Utilily Improvamenls 13 500,000 412,000 912,000
� 20 Regional Drainage Improvement Projects^ 3 579,637 579,637
Totel6yearClPcostlorpriaritylprqeds z.670.W0 2•183•8� ��540 9�5'636 3.�7.3� �.�.5� �1.913.847
2;2i9;8B9 k§SFBBB a;2S4;2S8 4�884 3;883;284 3;51�;1a6 8;948;165
Total6yearClPcostlorPdaity2Projecis � 2,313,000 3,010,000 453,000 1,135.000 445,000 7756
a96998 �;46S;BBB
- Totel6year CIP cost lorprio�ity 3 projeds �� �Q �� 0 0 579 637 279 637
874;889 SA2;BBB 3,F1�;4W 2a8,845 22�182 843d92 4;48§;249
TotalB�yearClPcost Xi,245,000 14,521,800 55,988,540 S1•35&63¢ �4.582308 52.315.T02 �,QQ�,1�
� S�r409�i38 i2�263,398 i2r774� �q464
-e.�Funds expire in 2011.
A Adddianal pmject cosfs inGuded in 20-peerGP.
�Aoiect 13C's sdredukd aRer 2014 aMis'mthbed ln fhe 2Q�eer GP
7.2
. Use of mntents on Nis sheet is subject�o Ihe limita6ons specifietl at the entl of Nis document.
: r. . 0 •' ' �"
' �
. 1�� 111 � �
% ' • ,
c • . • . �
011 101 /
. • .. .
� � ��/ �/�
� \
' 1�� 1 1 0 /////////// \
• '� 111 111 � \� �� \ �
\ \ \ jj�j
� \ , � �
. ., , ,., 0���� � � \� �
� ,,,,,,,,,, �
., e�����■������e
, ,. . . , , . , .
1 A
• � � � • �� \ . � � • � � " 1l.: � !.1 �! _-SL:—� 1 e. !.� 1 1 �__.
• _I !—!• : i" ' •� � . ��}. 4� .l J. •�1 i n� • •• R�� � "!L.1( I!�5. 1.�l: �
"� g " � � IIS! � � '4F `!_. � ' � 'tl • J" _\ � " � � lI�1. l� ._ � • �i. •iSR` .
� �_� • . •S.}I: . !" "J��S .1.• J_ "•J � '� •: 11.l.M t" ' •�11" ! �. � � �II : .
:t__ - I.• • �!�_ • � *)S: . �� . � .}I _1 :J. • • • ♦ • R�
!i - " �� ��• • �—!." �_�). ' 11 .!• -• 1" .\' :I— � '•J 1 • I � � � � � � " •12
•�.l�,J • • � . ! �_, ' � � � "�l. �. , • � .v.l � ' .� � • i1N • � �
!. � ' �a_ •1 J � ll ' ' • 1 • _ _� 11_� � "! " :/�_ _1 Y. ��
! •L Y SiS l_: ! s�l� 'I S' J . � ' - •�_1 ' � �. �1.! _� • . � 11.� 1. I '! . .I . � 11 1 "
� ' �• �!• • • ' � ' 1' .� � � . . I• • � " � � �
� • ' • � ��� '� • � �� � ' � I . 1 �i � • � " i. I.y: � : ..
•_ - � . � . s. �.• • w_..�t r - �. � � - . - ,�_._� • • �_- . • . � e. :i_. � '
� ...� -. :�. .� - ... .. � . • ���'�. .1� � vi .' � . � �� � .• • :u � ' ._• . • �. .
• u � . . . � � •_ . . . - 1: v_ . :!. • ' � ' • �_(• . -tl.�.. 1 ' � �
,. - nu_. ._ - _� ' . • � e - :�. � �.!s _ .�. s- 1 _ 1_: .�• ._ - • . . 1.
. . . 1 � . .. • . 11 _R • .• � 1 :
!{ ao �rs ,,. � � n !. ucr: ! i.
7:ImplemeMation Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
$6,000,000 �Priority 3
o Prioriry 2
�Priodry 1 (Projact)
w $5,000,000 - ■Priority 1 (Programmatic)
N
O
U
a $4,000,000 --='=_
U -- - -= -=
� -=--"' _-='=-'
� -::-_ _____
°� $3,000,000 '_-'=-"- -_--_--- -----
----- ----- -----
co =__==- --___= _—'-
------ -----
— ----- ----- --�__-
m ------ -----
� $2,000,000 -"'"' ""'
c -_=="- -===-'- ------
c -�u --_'-_ _'_-�-
----' ------
Q = r --'--
$1,000,000 -__-=_
$0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Year
,
�
.
>
73
Use olconlenls onlhis sheelis suhjecttothelimitelions specifed atihe entl ofthis documenl.
7:Implementa6on Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
� � - . �- -
_--_ - ---- -- -- --
Projed _ - ----_ _ _ _ Pr`oJeafcos�for207''r.2028
riumbe�, _ _._ Pro ea name Pdo 009 doliars
_J ____ ___ _ ._ __ ___..� _ _!!H_. .-----.(� _J.---
13C18 Relieve 30th St.NE AreaPlooding;Phasa�2 1 1 1
S�A9B
17 Storm Drainage Infrastructure Repair&Replacement 1 5,600,000
10 Regional Drainage Improvement Projects 3 7,000,000
Total 201 rr2028 GP cosf lor pdority 1 projects 6.754.000
6;6§4;889
Tofa1201�1028 CIP cost for pdoirty 2 pmjects 0
Tofa1207�1028 CIP cost for priority 3 projects 7,000,000
ToWI CIP eost(2p15 to 2028) E13.754.000
t73,654,0A0
Total 20-year CIP eost 5��
E��
Even with the benefit of staff experience and detailed hydiaulicinvestigations, the cecommended
capital unpxovement projects xeElect some uncectainty in the engineering calculations.To help
m;n;m;�e uncertainry, G-year and 20-year CIPs have been developed in conjunction with a
monitoring plan to obtain informarion that can be used in predesign studies to iefine the sizing of
pzoject components. The effort expended by the City to collect flow and level data to refine the CIP
elements will bring substantial benefits in teduced costs (as the engineering uncertainty envelope is
nauowed) and/oz impzoced perfoanance of CIP pxojects�nd likely both.The monitoxing plan is
included as Appendix E and summarized in the following secrion.
7.2 Monitorfing
Evaluating the adequacy of the stormwatex dxainage system and analyzing potendal capital
impzovements cequue extensive data to produce accurate and reliable zesulu. Such data indude not
only infrestructure data such as pipe_sues,invert elevadons,and outfall locations,but also
stoanwates data such as flow xates,runoff volumes,and flooding elevations. The City should
continue to collect these types of data and stote them in a consistent and otganized mannet. The
following sections describe specific tecommrndadons for additional monitoring data collection:
7.2.1 Precipitation Monitoring
Precipitation is the soutce of stormwatex runoff. Precipitation intrnsity and dutadon data are needed
to characterize rainfall-runoff pxocesses and adequately design foz dcainage of stonnwater runoff.
The City has been collecting piecipitation data at ciry hall since 1995, and is currendy using an Onset
model RG3 HOBO ripping bucket gauge to reco=d precipitation data. The City should continue to
monitor precipitaaon at city hall nsing this equipment. Howeder,an npgrade to telemetry-capable
equipment should be considered when the Ciry's data telemetry systexn is implemented (CIP Pcoject
2),which is scheduled foi 2009 and 2011. Integtating the xain gauge data into the telemetry system
will simplify data collection and m;n;,;,;�e the chance of losing important data due to an undetected
equipment failure. It is also recommended that a manual rau�gauge be kept as a backup and to
validate tecotded data.
7�4
Use of contents on ihis sheet is subjec�to the limitations specifietl al Ihe end of Ihis aocumenL
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN ACTIVITIES TIMELINE
City oi Auoum Compreheosive Stcrm�nater Drair�age Flzn 2009 2010 2011 201T 2073 2074 2015 2020 2025 2030
�, - � ;•, -. .��. ; . . „ � -. .
. ... �.- . ._ .: . .� .., �.:. �... .� ,._ :, �.t �:i � � .-: -,.
1. R Street SE Storm Drain Improvement I _ �_ �
2. SCADA(Telemetry) Upgrades ���-�____- --_ _� -- -
KEY
3. White River Storm Pump Siaiion Replacement, Phase 1 I __ -�� --_ - - - _ �-� �] Activity
4.White River Storm Pump Sfation Replacement, Phase 2
5. Peasley Canyon Culvert Replacement � -
f 7 Optional
6. M Street NElHarvey Road &Sih Street Improvements l_ - _
Continued
7. Les Gove Neighborhood Improvement cnmr+ - ° -___ - _._ into next
8.West Valley Highway �- � permit teim
9. Port of Seaftle Mitigation Project ��
� -+ Datafeed
10. M&O Facility Improvements j---�
11. Improvemenls for Auburn Way S, SR 1B at M and 17th St. �w_=��. - - _ - �Fr,�,? _ - _�
12. Bypass at 2nd Street SE and G Street SE -�- �i ___K _ - --�
13. Relieve 30fh Street NE Area Floodin ' , � ' ��� --�-- ._ �
9 � �-?-------------r------ -- l -
14.West Main St. Pump Upgrade ' ' _____ _'__' _ _ _ � i I
15. South 296th Street Pond Ex ansion i ' - � - � � '
P 1(7ot_ lihazat--- �� � -
16. Bry's Cove Pond Expansion i 'anm,[. �- - -_ - T , ' �
77. Storm Drainage InBasVucture Repair& Replacement I.-_ ' - -' - � � - --� ' - ��Fr�� �
18.Arterial Preservation Utility Improvements �__ ' �-- - - - '-� - � � - - � - . ♦ _� �
19. SOS Utility Improvemenls �_-- � ' - -- � '�, ---
Z0. Regional Drainage Improvement Projects � �'� I i i ' � ; � '
Q-Pipe-84. Parking lot near He�ry Road � j_ ---_-_--� � � ..
i ' ------.. ; I ; I ;
Q-Pipe-C346. G Street SE and 2nd Street SE i j I � -- �.. i----__--------� ' ' ' ' ' '
i
Q-Pipe-866.B Street SE and 12th Street SE [_ � _ �--�� i
Q-Pipe-C26.M Street SE and Auburn Way S �, � - � �- _ _T-�_i i
Q-Pipe-059. Dogwood Slreet ' � - . _ . . '
i
Q-Pipe-P2. Near West Main and SR 167 ' � .. - . -..--------....-------�-_, � - - -- - -�, ��� - � �
' _- . _ - ... .---- ' I I I i i
Q-Pipe-I10.30ih Streei NE near airport l��%�,�:�:°�g_-_- --___--_-------__----_____; ; ; � �
� - i
WL-Mill-D1,02,03.04. Mill Creek Profile ; � _ � ' '- _ . _. _ _. _ _ _ .
WL-Pond-01.WestAirport Pond � A -��y. e - .
� � - -�- :�-� .: � . ----- t ---- � , I •� ' �---- - - - �
._ _ ,... " ____� � � I i
WL-Pond-02.A Sireet SE and 17ih Street SE I._ -- - _ � _ . �
WL-Pond-03.D Street SE and 21st Street SE �__ __ - -- - � _ - � -� - �
WL-Pond-04. South 296th SVeet at 55th Ave S - - • - __ � � � - :. _
WL-Pond-05. Soulh 296th Street at 57th Place S - - . - -- � o _ - !_ �
WL-Pond-06. U Street SE and 29th Street SE j �- ` __ - � -�-� -� - - ---� _ I
-
� _- _ . . _.,..._
WL-Pond-07.M SUeet SE and 37th Sireet SE ��--- �- - -- �� - ' - - . - - � �
-- '
WL-Pond-DS,D9,10,11. Large Ponds for Dam Safety ' - ' r - �-��
I � - - - - - - -- - - --_.. - 1
svvmraaministrative[asks f - - -- - - -�-----" - "' �� - . „' �
... _--- '- -- - ----- i-. ._ _ . _ . -. . r _ . :_ . - _ . .- -. .-:--_ -_ - - -
Develop new stormwater manual � - - � ' -- - ----- --- -- � ` . . . .. . . . . .- . . . ..
, __ �------- . ._ . - - - - - - - --
Develop SWPPPs for Ciry facilities �:� - - __ � '
�
Update codes, standards, SOPs, maintenance tor IDDE '_ -- � �
Update codes,standards, SOPs, mainl.for consiruction.O&M � �- ._ _ _ ;
Public education and outreach, IDDE and oulfall monitorin - - ---- - ' ' ' _'
9 �-- --- - _ - - - - - -- -- - -------- ---- -
- - --------
- - - -- -- ---
- - - - -- J_-------� ----
-- ---- - '
. . -- - e
Completesysteminventory lio�._F��rc%•ES�1su _ -b�Pwu- �;..,.,r.,;�_ - � - _ ---�_3 ,
Conduct new economic life-cyGe analyses , , ' '
� - -T-` o - -'
Update,check. revise system inventory � _ -- -^_� - . � � -. _ _'
-• --
� - ----- - -- --- - �
Update criticaliiy database '- � '____________y -- - T'- o__1 !
RiskAssessmen�-AssetVulnerabilityAnalysis r - - �� �-- ` � --T, -- -- �
Evaluate M80 program � -- -- -- - - � - --- � i
Expand functionality of Cartegraph CMMS software � � '
. � ; �
Establish specifc sustainability goals and standards �_� _�__
� ° ` - -�
Review and refne LOS Goals �-- -- --•- - � _. _ _ _
Assistwiih Mill Creek Restoralion Studies - - - �-- - - -
I_�.
Evaluate Stonmvater Manaaement for pownlo�vn Area - �
�----- �-----_._--------- - .
LEMENTATION PLAN ACTNITIES TIMELINE
Cdy �bum Ccmprenensire Stcrmnater Crz�nag�°lan 2009 2010 2011 201Z 2013 2014 P015 2020 1025 2030
_ � � �n cz o3 ;a :i _. �n , �,i ;t ,. 7�i ,� ,. , .,
�
1. R Stree Storm Drain Improvement L_ .__.. �
2. SCADA(Te try) Upgrades K E Y
3.White River Stor ump Station Replacement, Phase 1 ..J Activity
4.White River Storm Pu Station Replacement, Phase 2 ' _ _ - - -- _ __ --J I Optional
5. Peasley Canyon Culvert R cement . - --.°�� � -`---- , ° ._ __ _ .. 1 Continued
6. M Street NE/Harvey Road&8lh eet Improvemenls i --- - � into next
7. Les Gove Neighborhood Improveme rn.rei - --- . =-=jr��:=z=- ------ - ��_ J permit term
8.West Valley Highway : _ _ .1 -� Data feed
9. Port of Seatlle Miligation Project �-- - � - --__ _] -
10. M8�0 Facility Improvements I _ .I
11. Improvements for Aubum Way S, SR 18 at M and 17fh I_����_�_ m.WS - _--_-� 1
�
12. Bypass at 2nd Street SE and G Street SE �_ _ i
13. Relieve 30fh Street NE Area Flooding � :�-------------------'---��'-------'-'------�---:-.--------��-----•--�-+tfnuei�. - i;�..,,-i
14. West Main St. Pump Upgrade ' � - .
15. South 296th Street Pond Expansion � '� '�w3,e i _
16. Bry's Cove Pond Expansion � � - � i - . -.-.. : _��
17. Storm Drainage In(rastructure Repair& Replacement �_ __. � � _ _ --�• .- ---�_-� _ _ - - "?._
18.Arterial Preservafion Utility Improvements f _-- __ � � - -- _ - � � -- ' � _ - ' - - k =� - �"�
19. SOS Utility Improvements �__ � � � -� ! '�, � �
: I I : I
20. RegionalDrainayelmprovemenlProjects ' �� � ; � � ���--�-�- ',��. - -
� -- - - --- --- - --- - i - - _' ��
Q-Pipe-84. Parking lot near Henry Road _ __ _ . . I ; �'� 4
Q-Pipe-C346. G Street SE and 2nd Street SE ; [,�--- _� --. . ____: ..=o% � '�,
Q-Pipe-866. B Street SE and 12th Street SE .f��/;i.-;:'_ _-_ � o��� t '�.
Q-Pipe-P29N a9tWe t Mt in a dUSR 167ay 5 .�. . ,� i��-_� . . .- --` ��� � '� . .� �.
.is,
Q-Pipe-110. 301hStreetNEnearairport < . , ., .,. . .=�� .-.._o- ..---------� �--�--�--��-- ------------ i � ; ;
� _ ..- - - . -_ _- ' - __ -'-- � � --. .. � .
WL-Mill-01,02.03,04. Mill Creek Profile I _ o-_ ._ _ _ �_ .
WL-Pond-Ot. West Airport Pond - -•;<�. - �--- --------------;------------.. .--- � : ; �.
- . .
WL-Pond-02.A Street SE and 171h Street SE f '� - �� - � � -� � � ---
..--- -- - -- - - - - -� - -- - �- . ._ .
WL-Pond-03. D Slreet SE and 21 st Street SE � � -- - � - - -
WL-Pond-04. South 296ih Sireet at SSth Ave S i -- - �� � �� -� � - - - - -- ..-�� l
WL-Pond-O5. Soulh 2961h Street at 571h Place 5 i � � ° ___
WL-Pond-O6. U Street SE and 29th Street SE � �.- ; _ -, '� �
WL-Pond-07. M Street SE and 37th Streel SE ( . _ .__ - � - � _��_ _ _ _ _ . .
� -_ . .. .1 . . � ._..:----._-- �- - - - - -
WL-Pond-D8,09,10.11. Large Ponds for Dam Safety 1 �- __ � ��___ _- .,. _ __ _ __. _ 1
. ,
SWMPadministraiivetasks -- --- -� - - � - - � ---'---
r - - - ---�- - - - - - r---- ----- - - -
_ _ _ .. _:. _ _ - - - - -- - - - - ------ ---------------------------------
Develop new stormwater manual � ' ,
Develop SWPPPs for City facililies � �
Update codes, standards, SOPs, maintenance for IDDE I ���
Update codes, standards, SOPs, maint. for consiructio . 8M I ' �� �
- - `- � : � : ---------------------
Publiceducationandoutreach, IDDEandoWfall itoring I _- - - _ � _ ,_ _� _ _ �,_�________________________ _________________________'
Complete system inventory i«v��.� �ewaqH:a= bie_= � �
_ , . S_�uR-�:1 . - 0""' � I :
_- " ._.. _ _- 4 • ,
Conduct new economic life-cycle a ses j �- - - -- � �
Update. check, revise system � entory ..- --------- 1 -'-------------------------. � --- .- - . _ �� 1
Update criticalily databas ' ' ' �--� �
� �
-------- -�- - _ :
�
Risk Assessment- et Vulnerabilily Analysis - - - -� _ -__ _ _ v
Evaluate M&O ram - - -- -- ---.- - - -- - L-, , '�,
.
Expand fu nality of Cartegraph CMMS sokware � --_ _ - ���-----���
Establ� specifc sustainability goals and sfandards j-- - - --_�--,
ew and refine LOS Goals L� - - _ - -_ -_ �
Assist wfth Mfll Creek Restoration Studies `-� �� � B_- I
-- -
EvalualeStormwaterManagementforpownlownArea I _ _ ___ _ _ _-��-------------�-------�---------.''
8:Financial Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DR4INAGE.PLAN
8.2.3 Capital Funding Plan
The CIP developed fot this Dtainage Plan torals 18 sepazate projects valued at��2Q�&6 million
3
� '
Significant projects during the 2009-2014 period include the following:
■ annual storm drainage infrastructure repau/replacement piojects: 52.6 million.
° arterial utility unpmvements: $1.3 million
■ relieving Auburn Way S flooding phases 1 and 2: 52.0 million
° zelieving 30th Stceet NE uea flooding phases 1 and 2: $��3 million
■ White River storm pump station replacement: $2.0 million
■ Peasley Canyon culvert xeplacemenr. $1.0 million
° West Main Stteet putnp upgrade: $1.1 million
■ S. 296th Street south pond expansion phases 1 and 2: $1.5 million
• West Valley f-Iighway unprovements:.$1.5 million
". SOS utiliry impxovemenu: $90Q000
" R Street storm drain unprovements: $770,000
� Port of Seattle mitigation agreeaient project: �600,000
■ SCADA telemetry upgtades 8520,000°.
Table 8-3 summarizes the annual costs associated with the 6-yeaz CIP.
.� i�• i . -
'' ' Year� "_ :° .Ann'ual CIP 20AA'9eHard'_. I �.fsealateA • '^
2009 3,245,000 2;24§BAB
2010 4,521,0004,-08�;888 4;�88,888
2011 5,986,540§,8�6;A9B_ §-086;446
2012 1.358.636 k9§3,998 �9&,536
2013 �¢3;238;8BB_ _ 3252;295
2014 2.315.2022;§8B;B9B 2k84;bfi4
6-year rotal 22$ .009.484$24Gi6,8A9 52B;8B�846
a
+�'alucs cscalatcd to ycarof ptojcct constructioo ba.cd upon an annual�inflation catc of 3 perccnt. � �
. . &7
Use of con�enis on this sheet is subject ro Ihe Ilmitalbns specifretl al the entl of Ihis tlocumenL
i
8:Financial Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DR4INAGE PLAN
.. • ��• � .. . -
' ?- r � ^- � 2009,', ' '_;_`2010 � 2011 2012 �' 3 �,1014''n ";. Tofal ' ';I
_.k'�_�3._..u�. �...:u�v�:a._r...,..i._.u_.'.:r._._ .�. �.1 C_....._
Total capital projects $3,245;000. 4 521 800 $5,986,540 � 1358 636 4 582 306 2 3$ ' 15'202 $22'009'484 ,
$4,�BB,88B $1�98�26 $2;3§33A5 $2;584,�64 '$24,8B�84C'
2010 Clty planned revenue bond $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Newrevenuebondpraceeds $0 $0 $4,658,723 $875,441 $3,147,475 $2,489,419 $11;171,058 ',
Use of system development changes $200;000 $Z00,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 ',
Use of capital fund balance $3,045,000 T 82Y 800 $1,127,817 28 1 12 4 8 1 374 217 71 426
$a,8B9;8BB $23;arJ5 S�83B $b,a-0F> $6;826;786
ToTal funding sources $3,245,000 521800 55,966,540 1358 636 ' 5 2 30 315 202 2 009 484
5�S0B S'�08,636 Sa353395 E2�694s5&4 520;89�846
8.3 Availab9e C0� �anc@ing Assistance and �inarec6rog
Resources
Feasible long-term capital funding sttategies should be defined to ensure that adequate resouxces are
available to fund the CIP identified in iliis Drainage Plan. In addition to the utility's resoutces such
as accuxnulated cash reserves,capital tevenues,bond proceeds; and SDCs,capital needs can also be
met from outside so�ces such as grants,low-interest loans, and bond financing. The following is a
summary of utiliry and outside resources.
8.3.7 Utelity Fiesources
Utility resoutces apptopriate fox funcling capital needs include accumulated cash in the CIP funds,
bond pioceeds,and capital revenues such as SDCs. The fust two resouxces have been discussed in
the Financial Policies secuon. Capital-ielated revenues are discussed below.
8.3.1.1 System Development Charges
An SDC as provided for by RCW 35.92.025 refexs to a one-time charge imposed on new customexs as
a condition of connecrion to the utility system.The purpose of the SDC is tcvofold: to promote equity
between new and exisring customezs,and to piovide a soucce of ievenue to fund capital pxojects.
Equity is seroed by pxoviding a vehicle fot new customeLS to shaze in the capital costs incuzxed to
support their addidon to the system. SDC revenues pxovide a:sonxce of cash flow used to support
utility capital needs;revenue can be used only to fund utility capital projects ox to pay debt service
incuaed to finance those projects.
In the absence of an SDC,growth-xelated capital costs would be borne in large part by e�cisting
customets. In addition, the net invesEment in the utility alxeady collected from existing customers,
whethex through tates,chazges, and/or assessments,would be diluted by the addirion of new
customexs, effecrively subsidizing new customexs with prior customexs'payments.To establish equity,
an SDC should recover a pxopottionate shaze of the e�risdng and future infrastructure costs fxom a
new customez. From a financial perspecrive,a new customer should become financially equivalent to
an existing customer by paying the SDC.
The following table summazizes the Cit}�s curxent SDC schedule.
e-9
Use of conlenls on Ihis sheel is sublect to ihe limitations specifed al ihe end of this documenl.
6:Financial Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
8.2.3 Capital Funding Plan
The CIP developed foz tivs Dxainage Plan totals 18 separate pxojects valued at$22.0�9�6 inillion
�•
Significant projects during the 2009-20i4 period include the folloiving.
■ annual storm dzainage infrastrucnue iepau/xeplacement projects: $2.G million
° arterial utility impzovements: $1.3 million
" relieving Aubum Way S flooding phases 1 and 2: 52.0 million
� relieving 30th Street NE azea flooding phases 1 and 2: $�¢�.3 million
" White Rives storm pump station replacement: $2.0 million
■ Peasley Canyon culvert replacement: $1.0 tnillion
° West Main Stseet pump upgxadec$11 million
" S. 296th Stxeet south pond expansion phases 1 and 2: $1.5 million
° West Valley Highway improvements: $1.5 million
� SOS utility unptovements: $900,000
° R Srteet storm drain improvements: $770,000
■ Port of Seatde mirigation agreetnent ptoject: $G00,000
" SCADA telemetry upgrades: $520,000°.
Table 8-3 suaunuizes the annual costs associated with the 6-yeaz CIP.
.. • i�• � .
�..�_.. ��.. _ __ �.� .... __ �
:_._:.�.._:__._Year�._��I :,:Mnual CIP�2BBBdeilars'_,__ ..._..._.��.�Ee�alated`-'-_,:
2009 3,245,OD0 3,24§,8A0
2070 . 4�,521,0004,4B4;8BB 4;59B;8B9�
2011 5,986,5405,9§B,8B9 §;886,649
2012 y�Q,¢,3F�962;9BB A-19&,625
2013 — 4'S82'3062;276;888 2;262;29g
2014 231• 5•2022kBB,9BB 2;SA4,�64
6-year total 522.009.484 829;StS;899 - $2488�845
+\'alucs escalatcd ro ycar of projca const{uctiaa 6ased upon an annual inflavon ratc of 3 percent. � �
&7
. Use of con�en�s on Ihis shee�is sublect lo Ihe limi181ion9 Specifed al lhe end of Ihis documenl.
8:Financial Plan COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER DRAINAGE PLAN
.. i�• i .. . •
_. ... . -- _�
------.-'—--,-. __2009_—, --:2010 '2011 �2012 2013 : � 'T014 -,_—Totel---
Total capital projecls $3,245,000: 54.521.800 $5,986,540 13S . 58.636 --84.582.306 --52.315.202 22 4
S4,§9&BBB Sa;�98;SaS 83;2�3;386 82:SA4;§64 'S2A;89�;84fi,
2010 City planned revenue bond $0 $2,500,000 EO � ' $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Newrevenuebondproceeds $0 $0 $4,658,723 ' $875,441 $3,147,475 $2,489,419 $11,171,058
Use af system developmeM changes $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $ZOD,000 $200,000 $1,200,000
Use of capital fund balance $3,045,000 51.821.800 $1,127,817 28319 15 .234.831 , 7(S3 4.2171 57.138.426
Sa;89&89B $23�495 E5,889 SG,346 $6,826;T8B
TMaI tunding sources 53,245,000 52180 y5,986,540� 7 358 636 582 306 315 202 009 084
E4�A8;809 E�10&,836 5�353�395 52,689i464 i2B;8B7�846
8.3 Available CI� Funding Assistance and Financeng
Resources
Feasible long-term capital funding strategies should be defined xo ensuce that adequate resources aze
available to fund the CIP identified in this Dxainage Plan. In addition to the utility's resources such
as accumulated cash reserves, capital revenues,bond proceeds,and SDCs, capital needs can also be
met from outside sources such as gxants,low-interest loans,and bond financing. 'The following is a
summary of utiliry and outside xesoucces.
8.3.7 C�tility 9tesources
Utility tesources apptopriate for fixnding capital needs include accutnulated cash in the CIP funds,
bond proceeds, and capital xevenues such as SDCs. The first two zesources have been discussed in
the Fiaancial Polides section. Capital-related zevenues aze discussed below.
8.3.1.1 System Deveiopment Charges
An SDC as pzovided foz by RCW 35.92.025 tefets to a one-time chatge imposed on new customers as
a condition of connection ro the utility system. The purpose of the SDC is twofold: to piomote equity
between new and exisring cusromers, and to provide a source of revenue to fund capital projects.
Equity is served by providing a velucle for new customexs to share in the capital cosu incurted to
suppon their addition to the system. SDC revenues provide a source of cash flow used to support
utiliry capital needs;tevenue can be used only to fund utiliry capital ptojects or to pay debt service
incurced to finance those pxojects.
In the absence of an SDC,growth-related capital costs would beborne in lazge pazt by existing
customers. In addirion,the net investment in the utiliry already collected from existing customers,
wkether through rates, chatges,and/oc assessments,would be diluted by the addiuon of uew
customers,effectively subsidizing new customexs with priot customers'payments. To establish equity,
an SDC should recover a proporrionate shaze of the existing and funue infiastructure costs from a
new customer. From a financial petspective, a new customex should become financially equivalent to
an existing customer by paying the SDC.
The following table summarizes the Ciry's current SDC schedule.
s:9
Use of contents on Ihis sheet is sublect lo Ihe limilations speci(ietl at Ihe entl of ihis tlocumenl.
DItAFT SPECIAL AREA PLAN �
Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties
Auburn, Washington
Prepared for
City of Auburn
July 2004
Revised October 2011
DRAFT SPECIAL AREA PLAN
Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties
Auburn, Washington
Prepared for
City of Auburn
25 West Main Street
Auburn, Washington 98001-4998
Prepared by
Herrera Environmental Consultants, Inc.
2200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1.100
Seattle, Washington 98121
Telephone: 206/441-9080
July 2004
Revised December 2004
Revised October 13, 2011
Contents
1. Introduction...............................................................................................................................l
1.1. Purpose of the Special Area Plan..................................................................................1
1.2. Background/Study Area................................................................................................1
13. Relationslup of Special Area Plan to Auburn Comprehensive P1an.............................5
1.4. Public Process...............................................................................................................6
2. Policies and Objectives................................................................................... .....: 7
,�' �f..................
21. Overall Vision.......................................................................:�.!/ `� .....................7
......
2.2. LandUse..........................................................................�.......,/�....�,....�..... ...8
•
. ,��......:�.......� ! . 11
23. Traffic and Circulation ............... .... ........... ................ ' ...............�..................18
2.4. Stormwater Management............... ........................ .. �
. . .:........
2.5. Floodplain Management...............................................1.::,.. ..::..................................18
2.6. Urban Design and Public Amenities..........................�.........�..:,.%�........................20
3. Implementation.............................................................,.::.\.............;��..............................23
3.1. Establishment of a Plan for New Streets axid U�i�ties../.............. . .
. . .........................23
3.2. Apportionment of Floodplain Compens�tion$ene�its from the Port of Seattle
Wedand Mirigation Site......................%.;1....;1.....................................................26
33. Creation of New Land Use District(Cucr�ntly"fermed C4)......................................27
3.4. Adoprion of the Planned Actioii Ordinance..:.............................................................28
4. References..................................;, ... �. . .........................................................................29
� � .. . .,�
/ �, \_� \ /, ,
�
�,. ,
/� % Figures
� /'
Figure 1. Viciniry�map of-he planning azea for the NE Auburn/Robertson Properties
Special A�te,a�Plan in Auburn, Washington. ....................................................................3
\
Figure 2. Aerial�,niap of the planning azea for the NE Auburn/Robertson Properties
SpecYalArea Plan............................................................................................................4
Figure 3. Proposed zoning for the NE Aubum/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan. ...........10
Figure 4. Road layout and classifications under the Prefeaed Altemative for the NE
Aubum/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan..........................................................13
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properfies
Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties
Special Area Plan
1. Introduction
1.1. Purpose of the Special Area Plan -
The purpose of the Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan is to address the
issues identified in the Ciry ofAuburn Comprehensive Plan (.Auburn2007)for the northernmost
portion of the city, between Aubum Way North and the Green River; which}s�f�red to as the
Northeast Aubum Special Plan Area(Figure 1). The Comprehensive P �� tified landbuse,
transportation, stormwater, flooding, azid development of the Port of eattle�t�ve �dlni.tigation
site as key elemen;s to be;addressed in the plan for this area: 1'his ial9azea plan:presents
solutions for limitations that have previously discouraged develop 'erit�in this azea and pmposes
actions that will both expedite development and protect against ad e "' e» uontnental impacts
due to development. r�/, "�
�� 1�
This Special Area Plan is intended to be implemented o�y thi�au�L�ubsequent approval of a
development agreement pursuant to RCW 36.70B.1���2 antl`�lanned action ordinance
pwsuant to RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-1b,�,4;- . 8,�-172.
The Special Area Plan was ori ig nallyprovi�ibnallv adoptedbyAuburn Citv Council bv
Ordinance No. 6183 in June 2008. The�rovisional adoption included zoning code man and text
changes. comnrehensive nlan ma�aud�text�han�es,and Special Area Plan adootion to
implement the policy d'uection-of.the Special�iea Plan. The comprehensive plan and zoning
chan es are conditioried n:the�ccessffl'execution o£a develo ment a eement between the
City and Robertson.�'Properties �roon(RPGI. These changes in designations do not become
permanent until�ie Citv Council conducts apublic hearina and,approves a development
aereement. Aue to the time inteival of several veazs between the ori '>��nal_provisional adoption of
the Speci�Ar�a Plan and as.s�o'ciated Comnrehensive Plan chan�es (2008) and the execution of
the Dev'eloprr5ent�AQreement there is a need to subsequentiv redise and update the Special Area
Plan.
1Z. Backgr� nd/Study Area
The area identified in the Comprehensive Plan includes.several lazge tracts of land that aze either
undeveloped or in low-intensity uses: The orig,inal boundaries shown in the City's 2007
Comprehensive Plan mapped designation included the area east of Aubum Way North,west of
the Green River, south of S. 277�' Street:and north of 37�' Street NE. Prior to the adoption of the
Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties Special AreaPlan,zoning in the study area allowed
multifamily residential development�Identified as R4, Multiple Familv Residentiall in the
northeastern portiorr of the azea and heavy commercial development(Identified as C3. Heaw
Commerciall in the western portion of tHe area A few lazge parcels in the center of the azea(the.
Valley 6 Drive-in T'heater)had Unclassified zonin� (Identified as i1NCl, which allowed only
id ro�e.m��.+w��.na�taa.�laos�l,�.�ials-ttda
Octobec 13, 2011 I Herrera Environmental Consultants
Special Area Plan—NoRheast AuburNRobertson Properties
low-density residential development and was intended to be a temporary designation until
appropriate zoning for the property was established.
In the azea,there aze few roads, limited drainage infrastructure, and several wetlands,and the
azea is subject to flooding. The azea is also underserved by public utilities.
The area is adjacent to two principal arterials. The construction of a minor arterial through the
area(I Street NE) is planned; it will serve as an alternative north-south route and provide access
to properties in the azea Its potential for excellent vehicle access and its flat terrain make the
area well suited for commercial and multifamily deyelopment.
For this special azea plan, the City established a"planning azea"or stud�o{ f_a'ppioxi�ately
120 acres of land bordered by Auburn Way North; South 277'� Street,�45�'Stree�• ` ,�and the.
existing undeveloped right-of-way of I Street NE (Figure 2).
The planning effort for theNortheast Auburn/Robertson Propert�e 5"acial Area'Plan was diiven
lar el b the desire of Robertson Pro erties Grou RPG ,the lar es� ro� holder in the
S Y Y P P� ) g F .P�Y,
planning area,to redevelop the Valley 6 Drive-in Theater complex and a�jacent properties. RPG
proposes to redevelop these properties(refeaed`to he�eaft�as the�Aubum Gateway project area)
with a mix of retail, office,and/or multifainily res��tial uses:. The Aubum Gateway project
��
E
W T/R�ra�lo/mea0�revdrSOal.m•/60s//m�la/M-ll.dnr
Herrera Environmenta/Consultants 2 December 21,.2011
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Fignre 1. Vicinity map of the planuing area for the NE Aaburn/Robertson Properties
Special Area Plan in Auburn,Washington. '
8:Sx11 b/w
pI NlbxyttlalonaWm�nvdec700�.revl0.0J-1/ml0.18.11.doc
Octobec 13, 2011 3 Herrera Environmental Gonsultants
_ _ _
Special.Aiea Plan=NOrtheast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Figure 2. Aerial map of t6e planning area for the NE Auburn/Robertson Properties
Special Area Plan:
8.Sx11 6/w
�I �
�
�_..
id ipW yrciderean���rcrdecl00J,nr10-0J-//ml0./8-//.dx �
Henera Environmental Consuttants 4 December 21, 201 f
Special Area P/a�Northeast Aubum/Robertson PropeRies
area also.includes three adjacent pazcels(identified as the McKee pmperty, Stein property, and
tlie southeast comer residence)that could be developed together with or sepazately from the RPG
properties. The orieinal Aubnm Gateway project area includedsa total of approximately59.5 I
acres. The boundaries of the planning azea, the Aubum Gateway project area, and these three
properties aze shown in Figure 2. _
The provisional adoption bv Auburn Ciri Council bv Ordinance No. 6183 in June 2008 included
zoning code map and text changes and comprehensive plan map and text chan es to implement
the policv direction of the Special Area Plan. T'he adoption also reduced the exteriorboundaries
of the Special Area Plan desienation. With this nlan adontion,the boundaries now more closelv
approximate the Project Area and Planning Area Boundaries, of the EIS.�Tie�e°�ed boundaries
now aze: east of Auburn Wav North, west of the Port of Seattle Access`Parcel`sJpaicel nu�bers
- - \:--�
0004200006. 9360600258 and 73606002601 and north of 45�' Street�NE.
After the �renaration of a Draft and Final Environmental Impact S�temBnts(EISI d J
provisional adoption of the Snecial Area Plan, in 2007 and 2008�obertson�Pr.6perties Group
(RPGI acquired an additional appioximately eleven acres of pronertv withiri the original
"planning area"or studv azea. Ttie additional four pazcels omprisin th�ae�pp 'r ximo ately eleven
acres.aze located west of the Valle -6 Drive-in Theat c�om 'lez�and west of D Street NE and aze
referred to as the"Auburn Gateway II"area. The ded.elev`en:aeres increased the size of the
Aubum Gateway Project area from approximatelyr59.5�{0 70�5 acres while the amount of
development proposed remained unchaneed:�Due to�h�'aldditional propertv,chan es in city
policies and development regulations and�u'e to chan€es in the surroundin¢develonment, an
addendum to the vrevious Environme�ifal'Tmoact Statemenu was required by and nrenazed under
the direction of the City. A revisionran�.up�ste.to the Special Area Plan was also wamdnted by
t�---
the time interval between.on ina�doptionan2008 and execution of the development a�eement.
- - -- �
The special are�an is intende :to�allow flexibility for responding to market conditions within a
specified rangf of land uses. Tli �plan would be implemented in multiple phases over
approximat�y�years. �
1.3. Relahonshi of pec�al Area Plan to Auburn Compre6ensive Plan
�,,±,�
This Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan is a component or sub-area olan I
of the Ciry ofAuburn Comprehensive Plan; therefore,the policies contained herein are policies
of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Northeast Aubum Special.Plan Area idenrified in the Comprehensive Plan had different
boundaries from those of the planning area chosen for the special azea plan. The planning azea
for this plan was chosen for several reasons. All of the Auburn Gateway project area is included.
Because the Port of Seattle construction access property includes an undeveloped sVeet right-of-
way (I Street NE) and because of a desire to examine altemative location for roads serving the
planning area, the northem portion of tfiis Port property was included in the planning area.
L� ro�x.��,.wdm�.•.��ozno+:re.�iaosiire.��aix-iteor
OCtober 13,2011 5 Herrera Environmental Consultants
Special Area Plan—Northeast AuburM2obertson Properties
The properiy east of the planning azea(Bristol property, also known as River Sands or Trail Run�
plat development) was omitted at the owners' request. The Port of Seattle wetland mitigation
site to the southeast was left out of the planning azea for the Northeast Auburn/Robertson
Properties Special Area Plan because the permitting process for the Port's project was expected
to proceed in advance of this planning process. Permits for the Port of Seattle ("Port"1 wetland
mitigadon site were subsequently issued bv aaencies with jurisdiction and the construction
comnleted. Maintenance and monitorin�of the wetland mitigation construction performance is
on�oin�by the Port.
In 2007 b Ci Ordinance No. 6102 the Ci ofAuburn and Port of Seattle a e�ed that the.Ci
would vacate ortions of the undevelo ed north-south ali ment of I.u� eet I�E�liiseetin .fhe Port
of Seattle's Access Pazcels (pazcel numbers 0004200006, 9360600258 and'7360 'Ob3605 and in
exchan�e for the vacation, the Citv would receive ri ts-of-wav in�r vi�d location onducive to
a new street network. The new rights-of-way include an east-west�ri�ht of-wav.on the south side
of S 277`h Street, new east-west right-of-way for the extension o�49th�Street I*lE and a re-ali�ned
north-southseQment of I Street NE, south of 45'� Street NE. There isa�utu're opportunitv
between the Citv and Port through agreement to adjust the'location of fhe ri�hts-of-wav for
oses such as minimizin the im act on wetlands�d achie�le road ali ents.
Properties south of the Port of Seattle wetland mitiga�rion sit�y were not examined in this planning
� process because at the start of the�rocess litfle�wasis'kaown about specific development plans
for ttiese properties. As witH all adjacent properties,�th owners were contacted;'however, they
submitted no comments during the p�\g process.
Prior the update and revisiori o.h Spec�alG-A'rea Plan,the apnroximatelv 41-acre Bristol
Propertv, also known!as the River_Sands oi Trail Run nlat was develooed between thevears of
2005 and 2009 wif�i 115 multiple familv dwellina units on a lot and 174 single familv dwelling
units each onxheir own lot under.fhe citv's then Planned Unit Development (PUDI regularions.
This proiec�included an interi`m'si¢nalized vehicle access to S 277'" Street and roadway stub to
the west'for a fu�ure connection to the extension of 49�' Street NE.
' Also,prior the updat�revision of the Special Area Plan, the anoroximatelv 40-acre pazcel
known as Auburn�40 or Monterev Park and located south of the Port of Seattle wetland
miti�ation sife �as developed for 239 single family dweping units under the ciry's then Planned
Unit Development(PUD)re�ulations. To meet secondarv access requiremenu, the City
�roval of this development included a phased extension of I Street NE north to connect io 45`�'
Street NE and proportional share of the sig.nalized intersection of 45"' Street NE and Aubum
Wav North.
1.4. Public Process
The planning process for the Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan has
included public meetings and requests for public input at several stages. Mailings were provided
to all owners and occupants within the planning azea and within 1,000 feet of the planning azea. -
W ;ora.,a�aru..�aMw�n�•,k�zaa..e,�iaos-ir.�•�ars.ii.��
Henera Environmental Consultants 6 December 2f,2011
Special Area P/an—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Public meetings were held to'explain the purpose of the planning process,to obtain input on the
environmental review of the proposal, and to obtain input on the altematives under
consideration.
The special azea plan is organized in two parts:
■ Policies and Otijectives, which describes the overall vision for the
planning azea and the policies that express the objectives of the special
azea plan
° Implementation,which describes the methods by which the spa�ialyarea
plan will be implemented. ``,\\��
2. Policies and Objectives
2.1. Overall Vision
The Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties Special Area�lan provide�B vision of high-quality
mixed-use uTban development in the largely undevel�e�d�2i�iin�ierutIlized planning area near
South 277�' Street and Auburn Way North. A wide ge�tises v�nll be possible in the planning
azea but will likely iaclude a lazge retail shopping�c�er wi 1 the possibility of substanrial office
and multifamily residential uses in the Aubw�i`Ciate y.�pr�ject area in the center of the planning
.:�'. � . �:
area. Development in the Aubum Gatewa�-pro�ect azea-will be guided by a set of design
standards ' ' es that will provide a�'hesive and amactive appearance for the azea. �
Development east and west of the AtibTi�r'�n C3ateway project area will be facilitated by floodplain
management planning and.the'cAmpletion�qf n we streets tUcough the planning azea.
New roads will impro" ve access o,��l parc�in the planning area: I Street NE will extend from
South 277th Str�et to 45�' Street� �;and 49�'Street NE will extend from Aubum Way North to
the eastern�e�ge of the planni� �area and the River Sand or'Trail Run Development, improving �
overal��rc�ulauon in the aze�. New trails and walkways will provide a pedestrian-friendly
system of ciioulauo_n tha�s linked to ottier recreation resources.
\J
Areas constraine '6y flooding will be made available for development by placing fill and
redirecting floo�iwaters to constructed storage azeas,while wetlands will generally remain
protected and enhanced or mirigated consistent with citv re ations. ,Stormwater systems will
be upgraded in accordance with the Aubum Comprehensive.Drainage P/an (Auburn
�98�e20091, and new pmjects will be designed to avoid overloading#�draina¢e systems during
major storms.
The special azea plan includes five general topics: land use,ttaffic and circulation, stormwater
management,floodplain management, and urban design and public amenities, each of which is
discussed in the following sections. Some of the policies listed below pertain to the entire
planning azea, while others aze intended to apply orily within the Auburn Gateway project azea.
jd ip8eprcidmwplmmM�700I.rerl0-0il/m/0./R-ll.dr
October 13,2011 7 Herrera Envir�nmenta!Consultants
Specia!Area PIan—Northeast Auburn/Robertson Properties
2.2. Land Use
1'his Special Area Plan is intended to be implemented after subsequent approval of a
development agreement pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170-210 and a planned action ordinance
pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, -168, and-172.
2.2.L Recommended Uses
After floodplains in the plazuring area have been filled and new roads and infrastructure have
been built,the azea will beappropriate for both heary commercial and multifamily residenrial
uses. The City of Auburn alieady has adequate land to accommodate the expei te�eeds for
housing, and it has an adequate supply of apartrnents serving low-to mod�ta-utcome
�� r .: .
households. In addition,residential development often does not generate as�,arge_a,'tax ba"se as .
commercial uses, and it generates more demand for services than commer�cial de`velopment. For
these reasons, a mixture of land uses should be allowed, but there s�hould be a prefer ce for
commercial uses.
Policy NE-1 In order to provide flexibility to respond to mazket n�ns, both heavy
I comaiercial and limited multifamily residential�i�ues when located on the noner �
stories of multiple storv buildines"should allowed"in tHe Au6urn Gateway
project area in a new mixed-use:commer�cia°I z,�/oiie�(Figure 3).
Policy NE-2 Heavy commercial uses that caii�conflict=wifh�residential development should not
be allowed in the new mixedt-se commerial zone, or they should be allowed
I only after conditional us permit approval, or allowed subject to certainsiting.and
design controls or performance standards: The types of uses that can conflict witfi
residenrial.uses mclude co�ial activiries with a high proportion of outdoor
Iacti�t�!,:noise;a�nd/��odo�s such as drive through uses.
Po licy N E-3 T he deve lopmen i o f commerci a l uses wi t hin t he Au bum Ga teway proje c t area are
Cfavored over mtifrifamily residential uses. Residential uses should only be
aAowed wfie�<.f cated in a multistory building and the ground floor contains a
pemu�tte�e or combination of uses, other than parking.
�//
2.2.2. Density an�d Limits and Overall Deve%pment
No change in the allowable density of development within the planning area is planned except
within the Auburn Gateway project area. Within the Aubum Gateway project azea office and
retail densiry would not be limited except as a result of other development standazds like parking,
6uilding height, and setbacks. Within the Auburn Gateway project azea, overall development
limits for the three primary categories of use should be as follows:
Policy NE-4 An overall maximum of 1.6 million square feet of office space will be established
for the Auburn Gateway project area planned action ordinance. If developed in
three-storybuildings,this represents approximately 35 percent coverage of the lot
with office buildings. Office development of this density could also include
pazking structures..
W iMS.���a/meopbnnvdrelaal.rev/a01(Iml0.1R-ll.dar
Henera Environmenta/Consultants 8 December 21, 2011
Special Area PIar�Northeast Au6um/Ro6ertson Properties.
Policy NE-5 An overall maximum of 720,000 square feet of retail space will be established in
the Auburn Gateway project area planned action ordinance. If developed in one-
and two-story buildings,this represents approximately 35 percent coverage of tfie:
lot with retail builclings.
Aolicy NE-6 Consistent with pblicies in the Aubarn Co"mprehensive Plan,the maximum �
allowable density for residential uses shonld lie 20 units per gross acre.
Policy NE-7 No more than 500 dwelling units should be conshvcted in the Auburn Gateway
project area under tfie planned action ordinance. .Residential uses sliould only be
allowed when located in a multistory building and the gronnd�obr•contains a
perniitted use or coai6inarion of uses, other than pazkin �/��\\` A
L%
jd ryr8;xcb/mwWm�mdre30oJ.mvl0.0i//m/0.1&/l.dor -'
October 13, 2011 9 Henera Environmenfal Consultants
Special Area Plarr—NortheastAubum/Robertson Properties
Figu�e 3. Proposed zoning for the NE Aubu�v/Robertson Properties Special Aiea Plan.
8.Sx11 color for PDF, B/w for printed copy
M ryW.rprrialmeaybrmdm I061 nv 10-0ill nr/0./N-ll.drc
Herrera Environmenta!Consultants 10 December 21, 2011
Specia/Area Plan—NoKheast Aubum/Robertson Properties
2:3. Tra�c and Circulation
The planning area is adjacent to one of the busiest intersections in t�e-Auburn (Auburn Way �
North and South 277�' Street). South 277`� Street is a principal arterial that needs to be widened
to accommodate expected growth,and Auburn Way North is a heavily used principal arterial that
is one of the few north-south routes through Aubum. In addition to providing access to adjacent
properties,the circulation plan shown in Figure 4 will facilitate the development of a new north-
south through rorite e.ventually connecting I Street NE from Harvey S�eefRoad NE to South I
277`�' Street. The streets shown in Figure 4 have been planned to accommodate the through
haffic expected as a result of future connections to arterials and the development of adjacent
properties.
The timing and chazacter of transportation improvements may need�b" e modihed•to,.lo�ically
support a phased developmerit of the land and/or conditions that m�}�.ha�change,�l�su►ce the
Environmental Impact Statement lEIS�was prepazed. Aay such m'difi�tions will be evaluated
by the City
ag�ee�r+ee���e�-to insure that anyimpacts of such modifications are�e al to or less than
those impacts disclose.d in the Draft and Final NE Aubucn�Robertson Pr�parties Special Area
Plan EIS er-s�se�r.tex�or subsequent environmental revie"., , I
2.3.1. South 277`"Street !�S
{,/
Completion of the previously planued mad- ening j " for South 277�' Street is critical for
the success of the Northeast Auburn/Robe on Properti s Special Area Plan. Tliis principal
arterial has been envisioned'to includ t�east two westbound and three eastbound through lanes,
and auxitiary lanes for local maneuueriiig whe�ecessary. The Northeast Auburn/Robertson
Properties Special Area P__ _�fielped t��efine the design of South 277�' Street, including the
following policies:
Policy NE-8 e City�wiilii�plement access management restrictions _� °-�-_�sto the
� South 277�' Stre.�et , _ . . orridor.
Policy NE- f Widening f South 277'�Street through the planning area should,occw primarily
��the so'uth side of the existing South 27'7`�'Sh�eet roadway due to uniformiri
�=i
azou�planned roadway centerline and due to existin�aericultural land deed
cestrichons to the north.
Policy NE-10 South 277w Street should be developed to include two lanes of westbound and
three lanes of eastbounil through tr�c through the planning area.
Policy NE-1 I Only one traffio-signal.should be constructed on South 277`� Street between
Aubum Way North and the Green River Bridge,and that signal should be at I
Street NE:unless traffic analysis accentable to the overning jurisdiction
� demonstrates that under an interim condition more than one signal can be safely
accommodated without adverselv affecting roadwav capacitv.
JJ /plRepecia(orca0(anrcvMa100l.revf0.01-/frev/0-16-1/.rbc
October 13, 2011 11 Herrera Environmenta/Consultants
Special Area PIan—NoRheast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Policy NE-12 Left turns to and from South 277�' Street sker�shall be permitted only at T C�
, ' si�nalized intersections. `
Policy NE-13
c`-°°••- ' °i-�-•'`'`' The intersections alona Soutfi 277`�at Aubum Way Nort}i, D
Street NE, and I Smet NE shall include.sufficient capacifv fo meet the Cif�
LOS standards:
Policy.NE-14 The trail on the south side of the road should be sepazate�m:th�eet by at �
� least 5 feet of landscape strip with street trees or alterci�te phys�ical'barrier.and it
should be a 12-foot-wide paved trail connecting Aub�irn W.ay North.�,'1t�e'�
pedestrian bridge over the Green River. ,
�
� Polic NE-15 Auxilia westeastbound ri ht turn ockets shoul be rovi ed•�alon .S 277�'
St at D St NE and I St NE.
1..i.2. I Street NE � ��r
I Street NE is critically unportant for accessto and visiliility for the commercial development
expected in the Aubum Gateway projecf'ar°ea. In aligning and designing I Street NE as shown in
Figure 4,priority has been given to the�foll wing.criteria in the following order:
� � � �
� '
jJ /pB.��iulorcunlmirc��✓rolaol.rcv/a05-1/rev/0.1A-L.Jx
Herrera Environmental Consultants 12 Decem6er 21,201 f
Special Area.P/an—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Figure 4. Road layout and classifications under the Preferred Alternative for the NE
Auburn/Robertson Properties Special Arei.Plan. .
81/2 x.l l b/w�wi7
Jd /�iR.specla/mrap/anrevdeelOW.ml0.01-1/rev/0./xJl.dx
October73, 2011 13 Herrera Environmental Consu/tants
SpecialArea PIan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
L
2. Ensure adequate capaciri and si�pacin s�o that I Street NE functions
well as a north-south minor�-set�tkrarterial from Sonth 277�' Sueet to
Harvey Road S�reet NE.
3. c_,..._.. .,,.�._.._..:..i ..,.......,. .,. .�,.. .,_.,.. ..,....L ,.r e,...«�. ���*�
��� �
> •
�.,.a;._,, i e�.....wTC :,. ....._t...,.a �.:...., v..,.,... c._..�...fi:lt�.a?�o,..,.t. ���� . �
o«...,.« «t,.,.a_,...... ,. ,.,.«:..,..,. T e,_.:,.«wit� ...:n _ `a::�+..i,.,....,..e .. �
e ^ � ,�\�/� .
Policy NE-1316 I Street NE should be developed in:the�location shown m Figure 4, so that
it coanecu to South 277`�' Street at approz emafely�the�same location as the existing
G Street NE right-of-way. � � : '� "
;...,..�.,, r c...ee.wrr .:,.�.. ,.c....... ..�a��_:,.w. ..r........._,._......._..«_,.....:_�a r_
,t......i,._...,...« ,.r r e«...,,.«wTC ..Gia w,..����a
`:�" �
Policy NE-17�H The new I Street NEshould be developed as a minor arterial meeting Ci.ty
standards with a minim�"'of'fiue`lanes, including two lanes in each direction plus
�� .✓
a left-tum-1 n�e,re appro�nate and include Class II bike lanes in accordance
withythe'Co prefieasive Transportation Plan.
POl1Cy NE-18� �n.,, :_..��e�:,,_ ,.o r c«......wTC ....a c,....w ���
\:.. .�.,.c._.....w,.!�oa,...,.i.......,.... :.. .�.,, e..�...� r«...............:e,,. ., e
� � � �
°��=�� .
�
/
Policy NE-19 , ,
;
�«..,.,.�n`"-�ee�
, • •, , ;
, , , -
o,.i:...,wrn �nr,..,..:ae..........:.... .......:...... ..c.�.., .. ., r e«_,,.wic ...,.w. ..e.,..... ,... .�.e z n .. �
u,.... „Fee.,..ie ,. .....n.,.«:,.., .. ..e.,.. :., ...,.ae r...,e..,w,.�,. ,.c...,... :.. .�,e r
W �n/RSperinlmronlanrev&a]00.1.rev1ao5-/Irer/0.1R-1/.✓a
Herrera Environmental Consultants 14 December 21, 2011
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
,
. . . _ � c...,.,..wrc
��
2.3:3. Auburn Way Norih
Auburn Way North is a regionally important arterial and an important commercial corridor. This
corridor carries a high volume of tr�c; therefore, modification to the corridor should be
designed to unprove the flow of traffic. New sigials are anticipated in at least two locations on
Auburn Way North, at 45�'Street NE and at 49�' Street NE: In addition,a major sienalized
driveway to the Auburn Gateway project area mav�be located between these two
intersections at some stage in the futuce aRer approprtat,��sis and
sienalization of the adjacent public street intersections.
Policy NE-20� New signalized intersections on Aubum Wa N" �o at 45"'St�efNE and
at the new driveway to the Auburn Gateway project are:ashouldbe allowed only
when traffic signal warrants are met and after it is�ler�i Qnstrat�that the
additional signal or signals will not have a noticeable ad'v�r�affect on the level
of service at the intersection of Auburn Wa � .orth and�outh 277�'Sueet or the
Aubnrn Way North comdor.
�� �� r 7. �-s�d-be-si�e�-is
:i . _ `�,; , �
.._ _.\'. : : . .
. � (/ . F�s. � .. �� � .
D..�,�, _. .
2.3.4 Str✓
�'�'_' c
D Street NE is an�xisting collector street that is noYdevelopeS to City standards. It isimportant
for local access�o abutting commercially zoned properties.
Policy NE-21�-5 At Auburn Way North, D Streef NE.should be closed and south of 49`� �
Sueet NE it should become,a local accessioad. If desired,this road could be
vacated south of 49'�"Street NE;provided adequate accessto adjacent properties
and easements for utiliries can be maintained or relocated.
Policy NE-22�b D Street NE_should be widened north of 49�' Street NE and improved to I
City standazds for collector arterials unless tliis portion of D Street NE is vacated.
Jd /plA.�prclolareaplanrevdec100{,rerlll-OJ-llrev/0./N-fl.duc
October 13, 2011 l5 Herrera Environmental Consultants
Special Area PJan—Northeast Aubum/Robertsbn Properties
� Policy NE-23� Access to South 277`� Street from D Street NE should be lunited to right-
in/right-out only to reduce conflicts with growing traffic voliunes at South 277°i
Street and Auburn Way North even if D Street NE is vacated and replaced by a
private accesspoint.
Policy NE-24�5 If the ri ht-of-wa is not vacated t�he sidewalk er�alone the east side of
�e D Street NE from 49 NE to South 277th shallee�be separated from the
street by at least 5 feet of landscape strip with street trees_
Policy NE-25 ' minunum of an 8-foot-wide paved trail conriecting to the
trail at South 277'�' Street shall be provided alon�"D" Stree[NE�om 49�'NE to
U- . .--,.
South 277th. A non-motorized frail easement should maintawgd., throu this
azea in the event D Street NE is vacated. �l
I 334. 2.3.5. 45`�Street NE � ` �
��
Forty-fifth Street NE is a collector.arterial that provides access to both c�mmercial and
multifamily residential properties and has recently been improved to C�s�tandards. It will also
c._.�
provide access to the south side of the Aubum Gatew�pro�ect�area�and to I Street NE. It will
likely become a significant shoit-cut for avoiding the mte eotion of Sopth 277'�' Street and
Aubum Way North once I Street NE is developed�id th�tersections are signalized.
Policy NE-26�4 Foriy-fifth Street NE�ller�!bs/��exEen�e�connected to I Street NE when
i�I Street NE is extended��between 45`� Street NE and 49�'NE.�e�Eiea-e€fi�ie
�, . �-----�. �, .
�����w��
� . .�
�
'.�2.3.'6. �9"'Saeet NE�}
As shown��g e 4,this road will become an nnportant connection between Au6um Way
North, I Street NE;�3�the properties east of the planning azea. It also provides a connection
across Auburn�y"North to B Street NW.
� Policy NE-273� Forty-ninth Street NE should be developed as a collector arterial. The
existing 49th Street NE roadway between Auburn Way North and D Street NE
' should be widened to meet City standards.
� Policy NE-283� The design of 49`� Street NE should be flexible to encourage maximum
utilization of the properties abutting the street butshould ensure an adequate
connection for pedestrians and bicycles as well as for vehicles.
Policy NE-2933 Use of 49'�' Street NE should be encouraged as an altemative route to
South 277�' Street west of'�°^�•°°- ��..«" ""'`�' ��Auburn Way North b}�
jJ ,pM xµrlal areap/anrev dre I00l,rev/O-0J-ll rev fa/tl-ILdoc
Herrera Environmenta/Consultants 16 Decem6er 21, 2011
Speciaf Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
u� • to I.
improve traffc flow and provide greater visibility for the commercial propertias
in theplanning area.
�4 � _ � � • ,
£�eet�rea��9�'-
, Policy NE-3033 East of I Street NE,49`� Street NE sHould be extended to the eastern edge
of the Auburn Gateway project azea as.shown in Figure 4. T'his�v��i11,�11ow an
eventual connection to the properties east of the Aubumg�'te�vay.;pro�ect area_
�'�'" t�,._-
�'7`'. _ �J"
'.�2.3.7. Pedestrian/Nosmotorized Circulation
The planning azea is served by a new pedestrian bridge to the east,wlricii cbnnects to
recreational trails along the Green River. The plan envisions building o�t�is connection and
�--� i
developing a trail network in the planning area that will�'a ' itate pedestrian/nonmotorized
movement with murimal conflict with vehicle traffic�
Policy NE-3136 A master plan for a pede trian/ onm torized network should be developed
tiy the Aubum Gateway Pro�ec�e�k�property owner before the
development of any_protier�v within the Auburn Gateway_proiec�ea
" . This s6ould be
.�_.,
consistent th�the,policies!�liste�here and in the section Urban Design and Public
Amenitie�
�ji
� "r m
Policy NE-32 �Urban trail' should parallel South 277 Street. I Street NE. and D Street �
NE to provide a�m�jor route for movement.
7'�., �. .
Policy`NE-3338 , All �eets in the planning area should be developed with sidewalks built I
oiCiry, dazds or.a functional equivalent iEit represents an improved design.
Policy NE-3434 Major destinations such as stores, office buildings,residential I
developments,open space,�:�ee�ie�ees;aud pazking facilities witUin the
Auburn Gateway project area should be connected to the public
pedestrian/nonmoforized circulation network in a coordinated manner.
Policy NE-3548 7'he pedeshian/nonmotorized circulation network should include amenities (
such as benches, 6ike stoiaee, landscaping,and interpretive materials to enhance
the quality of the experience and encouiage use by a wide range of citizens.
JJ /pBsprdafarrap/onrcvrkeSaOJ,rev10.05-/Irev/0./A-//.dm
Octo6er 13, 2011 I7 Herrera Environmentaf Consultants
Special Area Plan=NortheastAubum/Robertson Properties
2.4. Stormwater Management
1.4.I. Stormwater Detention and Treatment
Stormwater detention and treatment is required by the Auburn City Code for all new
development. In order to enswe that new stormwater systems function adequately, several
specific policies should be followed for development throughout the planning area.
� Policy NE-364� Stormwater drainage, detention, and treatment for public property,
including public streets,should generally be provided within the public right-of-
way or on other public pazcels. Stormwater facilities for public�infr�as�ructure
may be located on private property consistent with City ol'cies iegarding
liability for and maintenance of such facilities. �
�,_;�
Policy NE-374� Stormwater detention and treatment for portions of the plamm�g atea that
will remain private should be provided on the dev� _ent srte and be privately
owned and maintained. P�
Policy NE-3843 Stormwater detention and flow control'>designs should address the 100-
yeaz storm event and flood conditions,in�ypub_ lic,�orm conveyance system.
/`i �..�
. . �..r f..��'
Ap _
..�..�A�....,.:..�,.A ...:�L�sL,. A..l....... !_..�..... . D� e,.t� A�..A
" \'"`.'"` I . �
���5 ��
' ,:� t �F . . .. .
`,r
> •
" ,'��.�,.L....... �nri�..�nnc�� �
� ..�.;�Vl/ .
2.5. Floodpla'.-;<1VIanagement
The planning ar�ncompasses substantial azeas that have been mapped as being within the 100-
yeaz floodplain based on the 1995 Flood Insurance Rate Maps(FIRMI in effect. City policy and
reedlations does not allow filling of floodplain azeas unless an equal voluine of functionally
eguivalent floodplain is provided in compensation. The Port of Seattle has received perinits and
� has developed-a wetland mitigation site south and east of the planning area that includes
approximately 66.2 acre-feet of floodplain capacity that can be used to compensate for fill to be
placed in other azeas south of South 277'� Street and east of 80'�Avenue South(located west of
Auburn Way North) (Pazametrix 2007). The Port's project includeil construction of a
conveyance channel from the mitigation site north to South 277�' Street to hydrologically
connect the floodplain to the proposed floodplain storage. The existing channel along South
277tn Street is not lazge enough to contain and convey expected flood water flows, and will need
W m�x.qwemlmennfm�rc�•✓ee]oa.revlaos-llre./alx-11.Me
Herrera Environmental Consultants 18 Decem6er21, 2011
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson PropeRies �
to be widened. Filling necessary for road widening or other development adjacent to South
277th Street must be designed to preserve the hydrological connection between the Port of
Seattle wetland mitigation site and the floodplain in order for that conveyance channel to be .
effective.
On April 5, 2010,the City of Auburn approved interim floodplain re�ulations(Ordinance No..
6295; Ciri of Auburn. 20101 which re,placed the city's:previous floodplain resulations and
repealed the moratorium. The regularions incorporated federal habitat protection requirements
and created a new floodnlain development nermit nrocess to reolace the previous flood control
zoae permit. T'he chan�es include requiring new developments to prepare a habitatimpact
assessment that will be required for the Aubum Gateway Project. The G'ce'ved written
notificafion from FEMA dated September 21, 201 l, that FEMA reviewed th�ty s.intet�m .
re lations and concur the are consisfent with FEMA's model ordinance'�rriakin``tlie-
regulations no longer interim.
2.5.1. Port of Seattle R'etland Mitigation Site and Floodplain ompeirsation
\�/
Const�uction of the Port of Seattle wefland mitigation site was comple�d'in the Fall of 2006.
Full establishment of the plant communiry continued ' o°�° 0,..0^7,maintenance and performance �
monitoring will extend for additional years. The pro�ecTincl"' ed e wnstrucrion of a
floodwater conveyance channel across the PoR of�SJ'eattle co, ction access property (Figure
2). T6is conveyance extends to the south side•of South��27<7�Street but does not reach the twin
culverts under South 277`� Street that are dv�signed to�xarry floodwaters below the road.
Policy NE-3946 The floodwatgr'oonvey�e channel mnst be hydrologically connected �
from the twin.culv_erts un�e -5outh 277th Street to the floodplain compensation
azea onxhe"�,.-�P-°`�'`s� w�tland�ii�gadon site before the compensation will be
func2i'onal. The'tCy�iologic connection should be completed as part of the
dening of Sou ,377�' Street. If the hydrologic connection is needed to serve
�development ��occurs before construction of the road,the right-of-way needs
for road const ucrion should be taken.into account.
2.5.2. Phasing f,et+el`opment qnd Floodplain Compensation
%
The volume of fl��plain compensaUOn to be provided on the Port's wetland mitigation site'is
approximately 6b.2-acre-feet. Tlus is considered live storage and does not include areas that aze �
aaticipated to be open water. The total volume of floodplain capacity that is occupied bythe
100-yeaz flood has been estimated at 42.1 acre-feet for all azeas south of South 277�' Street and
east of 80�' Avenue South (located west of Auburn Way North) (Paramehix 2007). As such, the
Port of Seattle wetland mitigation site will compensate for the filling of all areas of the
floodplain based on the FEMA 1995 floodg,lain man cwrentiv in effect. ,
,
The Ciry of Auburn and the Port of Seattle are in the nrocess of amending an existing City and
Port Tnterlocal Aereement to secure the ciri's ri�ht to use the comnensatorv flood storage on the
id imBmecWmwCblmdeclaW.m�l6dll/m�/6/R-ll.da
October 13, 2011 19 Herrera Environmental Consu/tants.
Special Area PIan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Port's wetland mitiQation nronertv for filfin2 in the floodplain based on the 1995 FIRM ma�s.
Upon successful conclusion of the negoriations,the amount of floodplain compensation seoured
bv the Citv mav be apportioned to other propertv owners after storage is retained by the Port and
City. Apportionine to other property owners may be also be necessitated bv future chan eg s_in
the amount and depth of floodplain by FEMA.
Policy NE-404� The first priority for floodplain compensation should,be that required to
compensate for the construction of public infrastructure. Full compensation
should be provided for all floodplain filling that is required to construct roads,
public stormwater facilities, and other public facilities in the 1( g'azea.
�L�
�' Policy NE-4148 All compensation available after accounting for compensation for ublic
infrastructure must be apportioned to individual pro�erties�hiased ox�th�lume of
floodplain that occws on each property as a percent�ge�the entire floodplain
volume south of South 277�' Street and west of Aubum Wav North.
v
� Policy NE-4249 Any areas of floodplain filling that cannot be comgensated for by the:Port
of Seattle wetland mitigation site must be-c mo pensated for on an individual basis
Iin accordance with Ciry policies and re'61 t ons�
2.6. Urban Design and Public Amenitie�s �'"
Urban design can be an important tool in actii vmg goals f�land use and development. The
Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties Sp°ecial Area Plan provides an opportunity to achieve a
high degree of design quality.
����
Robertson Propertie�up�ha"s lielped to�develop and has committed to adhere to the Auburn
' Gateway Design Atchitectural and 6ite Desien Standards fx�+dek�ies, wfiich aze more stringent
than those reqtured by zoning re�iilations. In brder to achieve a consistent and cohesive urban
design chazact`er, the following�policies describe the objectives of the Aubum Gateway
Architect�al.and Site Desigi'Standazds6�el�iAes,and would initiallv be applied to the Aubum
Gatew'aY Pr`oi�ct.'tluoueh.annroval of the development agreement. By future amendments to the
Special Area Plan::the�itv should consider applving the Architectural and Site Desisn Standards
ary�y-throughout�planning area.�He-g�e�ies-ere
2.6.I. Urban Design Site Planning, Building Characteristics, and Land Uses
� Policy NE-4338 Site planning and building massing should be conducive to a
retail/commercial focus and visual chazacter, and comfortable human-scale
environments should be incorporated within all land uses in the planning azea.
� Policy NE-443� A disually friendly frontage with "street appeal°for passersby on major
streets (South 277`h Street, D Street NE, I Street NE,49�' Street NE, and Au6urn
Way North) should be developed.
, id ,qA.p�iol mcop/ar nvJ¢o]OpJ,m/0.0S11 m/0.l8-tl.dor
Herrera Environmental Consultants 20 December 21, 2011
Specia/Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properties
Policy NE-453� Building and/or landscape forms should be articulated as focal points,and �
major site entrance points should lie framed.
Policy NE-4633 The building characteristics and landscape design should include themes �
that unify the site character across multiple phases of development.
Policy NE-4734 Landscape plantings should be used to reduce the visual impact of open �
pazking areas and loading, service, and storage functions.
Policy NE11833 Multifamily development should be of high-quality desi , c eate a sense
of community and synergy between land uses, and includ.e a ti p`e-.�passive-use
open space appropriate for use by all age groups. ��i�� J�}
y �
�';7."r�
2.�2. Transportation Infrastructure �"r
Policy NE-4956 Develop a clear lrierarchy of road_systems�hz •p`ogre�'from major �
public thoroughfazes to intimate pedestrian-scale roads to�intemal roads serving
parking azeas and site uses. 1'his system must be cbnsi�en{with the road
configuration shown in Figure 4.
Policy NE-503� Provide for bus zones and p„ �stnan and°bicycle travel in a safe manner.
�.;� I
Policy NE-5138 Sarisfyaccess requir�rifents for`;soHd waste handling, utility,police, fire,
and emergency personn
2.6.3. ProjectArea Bounda .ry.and��Pourk
/::-_ ':Z
Policy NE-5239 sta-blis `a.clear"sense of place"that defines the distinct chazacter of the �
� �=='. •_
Aubum Gateway p �ect area through a unified approach to boundary and entry
esign.
Policy �3 � Clear y signify major entrance points to the Aubum Gateway project azea �
�and'to subareas within the project area by means of features such as prominent
tiit�c ural or artistic landmarks.
Policy NE-546�1-� Define differences in land uses within the Auburn Gateway project area.
6 I
Policy NE-SSb� Develop hierarcluesbf spaces from publio-to private spaces to delineate
azeas of ownership and responsibility.
Policy NE-56�3 Protect property values and unify the Auburn Gateway project area by
means of a consistent buildin�character and landscape theme.
Policy NE-5764 Screen unsightly views from public areas by a combina6on of walls,
landscape planting,.screening and/or use of building massing.
Jrl /pt8�pe�ialareao�nvde��200l.rcv10.0Ylfrevl0./8-/l.dx
October 13, 2011 21 Herrsra Environmental Consultants
Specra/Area Plan—NORheast Autium/Robertson Properties
Policy NE-58�3 Idenrify an interconnected system of bicycle and pedestrian pathways .
.,a «we�e..:..,e«e_,.o.we �..w...... �.,.e..........,.:,.,.. .._,.., linking the Auburn
Gatewa�proiect area to natural azeas and the regional trail system.
2.6.4. Parking Areas
� Policy NE-59F6 Design parking areas to maximize their nayigability by pedestrian and
vehicles and�nimize their visual and ecological impacts.
� Policy NE-60� Provide adequate efficient onsite pazking in locations convenient to
destinadons.
� Policy NE-6168 Ensure pedestrian safety by providing ample , al" kways��ttia�,se arated
from parking and travel lanes. �
I Policy NE-6264 Use crime prevention through environmental�e�(CP ED)principles
to reduce fear of crime and ensure user safery. � .�
2.6.5. Pedestrian/Nonmotorized Circulation Networks �'� ' �/
� Policy NE-63�8 Create a�ea�continnous and connected network of.
�r., < ,. ,
pedestrian/nonmotorized circuladon:faciI_ ihesKn the Aubum Gateway project azea
and vicinity. �,,`1 1 �'�%'j
t�.�
� Policy NE-64�- Create a pedestnan environment in which it is easy, safe,convenient,and
wmfortable to walk be�twee�esses, to transit stops, across streets, and
through parking lots.
� Policy NE-65� Encourage tYie use of nonmotorized transportation to and within the
Q��,..r� .
�,,Auburn Gateway pro�ect area by providing facilities that aze adequately sized;
,.•�well-built, well�aintained, and connected to existing or planned
�
'pedestrian/n otorized circulation facilities in the vicinity.
2.6.6. Site Lighliitg,
Policy NE-66a3 Ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety by providing adequate lighting on
pedestrian routes and roadwavs.
Policy NE-67�4 Minimize the negadve effects of onsite and offsite glaze.
Policy NE-68�3 Provide energy-efficient lighting.
2.6.7. Natural Amenities and Recreation Areas
� Policy NE-69�6 Provide habitat preservation, enhancement and opportunities for human
enjoyment of wildlife.
M m�HSneclnlarennlonnvJecloay.evlo-05-/trevlalR-//.da�
Herrera Envrronmental Consultants 22 December 21, 2011
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Properfies
Policy NE-70� Wetlands that contain low-functions and values as evidenced by limited I
size and isolation from hydrological systems,may be considered by the city for
development and displacement in conjunction with specific environmental
review, appropriate initigation and permitting from the city and applicable outside
agencies.
Policy NE-71�8 Provide amactive options for integrating wet ponds, stormwater treatment �
facilities, and detentibn ponds as an amenity to the land uses in the project area.
Policy NE-72�9 Reduce downstream floodwater volumes from run�� I
Policy NE-73S8 Enhance property values by incorporating spstainable�v er man�a�ement
practices.
2.6 8. Sitewide Signage and Graphics
Policy NE-74$� Enrich the experience of visitors and customers by�pioviiling directions I
and information in a coordinated visually pleasing way tl�2t'and prevents
confusion.
Policy NE-758� Provide clear and legible si ; ir 6o and signage for customers, bus �
passengers, and visitors..
Policy NE-76S3 Define the chazacter�of the Auburn Gateway project area as a distinct �
entity for instant roaci�ide recognition and street appeal to attract customers.
Policy NE-7784 �ti esigns'a"nd durable,resource-efficient materials.
Policy NE-78 ¢' M'inimi'd:.t�h�adverse impacu of signs, such as visual clutter,-ar�glare
,�and lieht levels.�through the development of a master signage plan to be adhered
:to throughout�he development of the Auburn Gateway project area.
3. Implemeilfation
3.1. Establishment of a Plan for New Streets and Utilities
3.I.1. Publie Streeis
Public streets in the planning azea will be developed according to the conceptual plan shown in
Figure 4. Fina1 requirements for lane configurarion and'geoa►etry of intersections will be
determined�+e�efleddevele�ec�'by the Ciry Engineerbased on environmental analvsis in
conformance with the Citv's ensineering desien standards.: Improvements will �enerallv consist
of the following:
° Widening of South 277'� Street adjacent the Auburn Gateway project azea
p ipra.mermloreeplonmdeeMw.m�/60t/1m10.1x-t/.dar
October 13, 2011 23 Herrera Environmentai Consultants
Special Area P/an-lVortheast Aubum/Robertson Properties
■ Widening of D Street NE on the east side of the existing roadway, from
49�' Street NE to South 277'� Street,except for the oortion of the risht-of-
wav vacated.
■ Closure of D Street NE at Auburn Way North and construction of a cul-
de-sac (unless this street is vacated)
■ Construction of I Street NE from South 277`� Street to 45�' Sueet NE
° Construcuon of 49�' Street NE from D Street NE to the eastern edge "f tke
Auburn Gateway project azea
■ Construction of 45�' Street NE firom the existing eastern"" end of the
to the new alignment of I Street NE. '� �'
° . Widening of South 277�' Street adjacent to pro ies ot e_r than�those in
the Aubum Gateivay project azea �
� �"�
■ Widening of D Street NE on the west side of�the�'ex'�s6ng roadway, from
n, m ii .� �;, :,�
49 Street NE to South 277 Streetf u�nle�s this street is vacated)
° Widening of 49�' Street NE from D Str"vf NE to Auburn Way North
' ■ Construction of 49�' Stree" f'.NE from the eastern edge of the Auburn
Gateway project area to�`tfie�' edge of the Port of Seattle construction
access propeity'
° Co�"struction ot li,3treet NE south of 45`� Street NE.
/ :;f
3.1:Z. Pu6li�tilities f`��
Public st�im;d�ina �4e�e�e�ee�ve�e�systems�e-�e�will be�e�-provided es
s�ee�s-et'e-deve,ope_d,�urs in the planning azea—in conformance with the Citv's Enrzineering ,
Desim standardsl'.e.�,.:c.,...tt.. ....,, ete.,.e..... ,.f.t,e r:... ,.F n..�......, �,.....:,.,.G,.....:..,, n_,...:,.,.,.
e
Policv NE-79 Prior to the development of anv propertv, a master storm drainage plan containing
sufficient informafion, includine su�porting storm drainaee calculation,to
demonstrate that the system layout is feasible shall be shall be submitted to the
Citv for review and approval. All storm drainage facilities shall be provided
consistent with the masterplan.
, 4 T1... ..�,...... .. ..I,..... Tl C�..,.,.�7.TL' ...:11 L............:i,..l 1...�1.,. ,7,...,.1....,...,.0 .
lJ ,MA.qrr�w/mmWmi revdre700J.m IQOiI(rcv 10./A-/l.dx�
Nerrera Environmental Consultants 24 December 21, 2011
Special Area Plan—Northeast Aubum/Robertson Propertres
n..,.:... ,, nr,... n..t....... �nm,.�nnm.. .
s
.. .. . . . .. . - - ' . _.._. ._ : �n �
�2Y2�9�AieEl£�986lk£9:
m -
o .� .
� . d. '�. '.......1 �
. '.J
���� C�-89H'$$�i8�@�-9c�ioFiiiic � .�
Public sani sewer facilities shall be "vided as develo ent occurs in the lannin area in
conformance with the Citv's Engineerin� •esi� Standards.
/ '�
Policv NE-80 Prior to th ee'd'elo�iierit o �' yprooertv.a master sanitary sewer plan containing
suffici�ntinf rmation: mclu`ding supportin�hydraulic analysis,to demonstrate
tha�the svstem la`yout.is feasible shall be submitted to the City for reviewand
/approval. A—1 aziitary sewer facilities shall be nrovided consistent with the
\master plan. '
Public water acilities s 1 be rovided as develo ment occurs in the lannin azea in
conformance ffi'fhe City's.enaineerine design standazds. Snecific water svstem improvements
needed to serve the area include tlie.installation of a 12-inch water main in 49�' Street NE from
Aubum Wa North to I Street NE and a 12-inch water main alon the extension of I Street NE
between 45 Street NE and South 277�' Street.
Policy NE-81 Prior to the development of anv prop8rtv.a master water plan containing
sufficient information; including su�ortin�ydraulic analvsis, to demonsuate
that the s�sfem layouf is feasible and nrovides adeauate fire flow and svstem
reliability sha11 be submitted to the Citv for review and apnroval. All water
facilities shall be pmvided consistent with the master plan..
�d �pl8.menolmwdmrrtrdrc1061.mlQ011/rev/0./U-If.d�c
October 13, 2011 25 Henera Environmenfal Consuttants
Specia!Area PIar�Northeast AuburNRobertson Properties
• �
� � c«.:.....*TO ....a c.....t ���� o._,.... ^rt:.. :...-..�:_..
�ccr-rnc-maar�
m
3.2. Apportionment of Floodplain Compensarion Benefits from�`tL�Port of Seattle
Wetiand Mitigation Site
The total volume of flood capacity during a 100-year flood has been estun�be 42.1 acre-
feet in the azea south off South 277�' Street and east of 80`�Avenue Soutfi(west of Aubiun Way
� North) (Parametrix 2007). The Port of Seattle wetland•�,gaiion site will-provide 66.2 acre-
feet of new flood storage capacity during a T00-year�loo event(Parametrix 2007). 1'herefore,
the compensation provided by the Port's wetland mih on site will-compensate for the filling
of all floodplain azeas based on the 1995 FEME1 Flood Ins�rance Rate Map in effect. The Ci
of Auburn and the PoR of Seattle aze in theprocess of.ainending an existin�C�ity and Port
Interlocal Agreement to secure the city'`sj'ight to use the comnensatorv flood stora�e on the
Port's wetland miti atg ion propertv fai fiIline:in the floodplain based on the 1995 FIRM ma�s.
U�on successful conclusion•of.the neeoti�ations the amount of floodplain compensation secured
by the Citv ma�be.app6Rionedito other p,r�'nertv owne�s after storage is retained bv the Port and
Citv. -' � :� � .
>� � ,, �
. �� .
���, . �
• ,�._�,�r . _
. '
...1. .. ..:,7.......71.v..A ..�,..........,.�,...A,.�,...f:S... C,.:1:�:,... ., :,.�e,J ...:A. ....1.1:,. ,.t..,...a..
• f
C�....,,� ......1 ......� ,.0 A..L..�. \57....Ai,...A. ...:Il 1... �
.....�1.. :Fai...�.. :.. ..a..�...... F.. Z!1 ....�,. C.:..� ,.CA,.,.A.....�,.....,...�l. ..FC,...A."1'Tf� Oa�....t....A '1'7
. f . . �OLSCCT'�SSS.T
,. r,.« ,.c........................ „ ,.:... c....., .�.� n,....>.. .. ,.,.. _ .. .�... _...:,. .. ..ta �.., nn
- >
��
W inrRSpe�lalanadmisevder100l.rtv/0.4i1/m/0.!A-II.Jrc
Herrera Environmental Consultants 26 December 21, 2011
Special Area Plan—Northeasf Aubum/Robertson Properties
3. �4s eae� 1:....ti.... C......: �,. A,.. 1...........� :,. .....A.. �L.........:.... 'll 1... Ll,. �.. '1:�,_
@��noacco:a xo�x-prxvucc uc�cxoFrmcn�-[�-nmarmc-pac�vo't-"w"xsvc-mnc-cvv`acres
:,.7...........F .....J ...,..dA 1.......�.. 1.,. ..�....:A..A .... Q...
3.3. Creation of New Land Use District
3.3.1. Purpose of the C4 Mized-Use CommerciaJ District
The intent and objecuve of the C4. Mixed Use Commeicial district classification and iu �
application is to provide for a pedestrian-oriented mix of retail, office,and multi,�a�ily
residential uses. This classification is intended to provide flexibiliry in d�gn�and,a combination
of uses that is responsive to market demands. �
This Special Area Plan is intended to be implemented only throu su uent approval of a
development agreement pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170-210 and a p' `ed\action ordinance
pursuant to RCW 43.21C.031 and WAC 197-11-164, -168,and �I72. ' `
3.3.2. Loca;ional Criteria
The new mixed-use commercial district should be a lied o 41ie �burn Gateway project area as
shown in Figure 3. This group of properties is co�s of la�r e enough parcels to
aocommodate mulrifamily residential devel�ment tsn�udes.buffers for adjacent mads and
coinmeroial azeas and/or a wide range of commercial;uses. Properties closer to the intersection
of South 277�' Street and Auburn Way_ ,oith may also be suitable for this wning designadon.
� �.�/
3.3.3. Specific Use and Deve[opment Sta`�ds
The uses enumented to�'s�onin�classificarion constitute a mix that accommodates
multifamily resid�al,retail, a�id�ffice uses anticipated thmugh a coordinated, site-specific
planning proc�ess. In order to ac�ieve a quality of environment that is conducive to this mix of
uses,c�eavy commerci �uses that aze permitted in other commercial classifications are
�__ >: ��
not per�nitt m'�this district�because of the potential for conflicts with residential uses.
The C4 distri�l�al oI`w most of the uses allowed in the C3, Heavy Commercial district, with �
the exception of�'ree-standing gas stations, light manufacturing,automobile sales, and similar
uses that could.t ave adverse affects on residential usesif constructed in close proximity. Unlike
the C3 district, multifanuly uses will be permitted outright in the C4 district.
Development standards for commercial uses in the C4 district aze the same as those for
commercial uses in the C3 district,except that they also include several standards for gasoline
starions that are accessory to another use, similaz to those in the C2. Central Business District.
zonine district. Development standards for multifanuly development in the C4 district will
generally be the same as those for the R4 district (subsequendy changed to RZO. Residential with
minor changes to the development standazds). In order to be consistent with the Comprehensive
plan policy regarding multifamilydensity, a density limit of bne unit per 2,000 square feet of lot
azea will be required, which would result in approximately 20 units per acre.
Jd ry�F.ryecialaread�revde�•]OOJ.rev/O-0J-I/nrl0.lR-/l.dx ' .
October 13, 2011 27 Herrere EnvironmentaFConsultants.
Specra/Area PIan-Northeast Aubum/Robarison PropeKies
3.4. Adoption of the Planned Action Ordinance
3.4.1. Purpose ojthe Planned Action Ordinance
The adoption of a planned action ordinance will allow the City to define specific actions that can
be taken without further envimnmental review. The environmental review process for this
special area plan was combined with the preparation of an EIS for the Auburn Gateway project
area. By means of the EIS,the City was able to identify measures for mitigating any potentially
Isignificant environmental impacu,the Aubum Gateway project can be designated by Citv
ordinance as a planned action consistent with state law(Revised Code of Washington, Chaptef
43.21 C, Section 031). The purpose of adopting a planned action ordinance is to estalblish both
the range of acrions and the types of mitigarion measures that will be r,qui�dlfor+t��hose actions;
and to establish a timeframe within which the planned action must bercompleted.. �Design�tion as
` . - .�'
a planned action will streamline and expedite the review process fo�and,use pern�or the
Auburn Gateway project by relying on a completed and existing�'ted- envuonmental analysis
for the project azea �
�9�
3.4.2. Thresholds for Review under the Planned Action
1'hresholds will be established for the planned action defin�g the Types of land uses thaf will be
permitted and the quantity of each, the total num6er of pe�tc-hour ninary vehicle trips that could
be generated by the pmject,the types and'locatio�of modificatio s that could be made to major
regional arterials,the amount of excavation and filling that<c�an take place in the project azea,the
amount of impervious surface that could be.fpTaced iriS�ieproject azea,the amount of fill that may
be placed in a floodplain, and the amountof fill that may be placed in wetlands: In addition,the
tuneframe for theplanned action willDbe liauted to anapproximately 15-yeaz timeframe ,which
is coricurrent with the furthest-projection�f'or wluch reliable traffic modeling information could ..
Ibe proyided. Projects�lr�at e�eed;the thre�ho ds established in the planned acrion ordinance,
include elements no�•nreviously.:ana�lyzedan the envimnmental review or occur after the 15-year
timeframe wi�e subject to thetnormal environmental review process.
�
/1
I 3.4.3. stgn._ eview Process and Design Standards�ue�efi+res
��___� .�
A design review;.pro�e�/w�ll be established as part of the site plan review for projects that are
covered under tt�planned action ordinance. The Ciry will adopt a set of design
I standazd�for implementing the utban design policies described in this plan. Any •
project constructed as a planned action under the ordinance will be required to derrionstrate how
� the project meets the design standards ' ' es. To facilitate coordinated design,master plans
for site grading, driveways,pedestrian/non-motorized circulation, signage and landscaping will
be'required. The Director of Planning�-and Development�ex�i�or.Ciri Engineer
as appronriate, will have the authority to require revisions to the site plans to make th6m cbnform
with the design g�idekxes-standards and the approved master plans.
3.4.4. Tracking of Impacts and Mitigation
The City will track the development of the Auburn Gateway project area to ensure that all
mitigation measures aze being implemented at the appropriate time in the development and to
W in�Ascerb/ormnlonrcvdee100t.revl0.oi/Irevla/dJ/.Mx� .
Henera Environmental Consultants 28 December 21, 2011
Specia!Area Plan—Northeast Au6um/Robertson Prope�ties
ensure that the overall thresholds for the planned action have not been exceeded. The Ciry will
track vehicle trips generated,total volume of fill and excavated soil, volume of fill placed in
floodplains, area of fill placed in wetlands, and the quantity of uses in three general use
categories: office, retail, and residenrial.
4. References
Auburn,City of. 2001. Geogapluc information system data. Provided to Herreia Environmental
Consultants,Seattle, Wastvngton,on January 23,2003. The data include an orthographic aerial
photo of the planning area taken in 2001.
Auburn,City of. �80�a2009. Comprehensive Drainage Plan. Produced' by T �Tecfi/KCM, �
Seattle, Washington. August 2002. ���
Aubum,City of. 2002b. Geograpliic information system data. Prouided to�Herreza Environmental
Consultants, Inc., Seattle,Washington,on May 14,2002,by Fd Kn ght,�ity of/Aubum. Hazard
area maps provided by City of Aubum,Planning Department Data include•c"rty limiu; street
centerlines;Comprehensive Plan desigaations;wning desi�iab�'ons; FEMA zones;digtal
orthophotos;water, stocm,and sewer utility systems; �dings,• fo�graphy;wetlands;and
assessor's pazcels. �/��!f . .
�
Aubum,City of 2007. City of Aubum Comp 1�ensive•Plan. Ong�nally adopted in August 1986;
amended in April 1995 to comply with the,�Management Act. Revised December
�09�2010. �. \
Thomas Bros. Maps. 2000.•�e Thomas i de: Pacific Northwest,Washington and Oregon.
Ulman,Joe. 200b3,, Personal co ��iication(email to Ralph Wessels, Port of Seattle,regarding
flood studies).�Pazametrix,Inc.,/ICirkland, Washington. Mazch 12,2003.
�t�
Unive�sity�f W.a�hington.�90 Aerial photographs from the University of Washington map
database. Pho gaphs dated 1990; source unknown. Obtained April 4,2003,from website:
<http://duff.ge��o��Vashington.ediildata/raster/doqs>.
Wessels,Ralph.i2003. Personal communication(letter to Tim Carlaw,City of Auburn, regazding
flood control zone permit application for PoR of Seattle's wedand development project). Third
Runway Project Manager,Port of Seattle. October 30,2003.
Parametrix. 2007. Federal Emergency Management A�ency Conditional Letter of Map Revision.
Prepazed for City of Aubum Department of Public Works.July 2007
FEMA(Federal Emergency Mariagement Agency). 1995 Flood Insurance Rate Map,King County
and Incorporated Areas Map Number 53033C1252 F and 53033C1251 F . Revised May 16, 1995.+
le mrx.�reom��oo�o�.��,��1ow.,.�•io-os-u.:��o-ix-u.a,� . .
October 13, 2011 29 Herrera Environmental Consu/tants
n
m
�P
p KC K� :,;
A-10 � A-10 A-10 �OSF � i�qtN'� �
,hSNS�
Pt -
C4
LL
Z
F-
° PUD ���f. i
C3 1
I
d9i11 SL�� y
- C4 II
� I G0.EEN(
RIVER(
u O�fliscd-UuCommemial
R2� C3 Heasy[ammmcim Diz�na
C 3 �m�e�����U.�o�.�d��
� MI Li��InMAnal Diztritl
i PIPublic�seDistrict
KC •••••
P� i PUDPIamedUnitD¢velopmcnt
R-4 KC
� R]Rcadmfial]DUlqcre
R•4
R?0 Rasidm6d?0 DU�Acrc
528iT}I [, KCA-IOKiogCaunryAyncuimre
— � KCRSKingCounry0.esidmtial
f � C3 ��� AubumGatewayPmjenPOUndary
�
_ � � RannmgAreaBoundrry
P' hti1 � /�/ s�� `�4',
�
o :aa eea N_a �.c�o
4'_VDST J'NUSThE �I F FEET
-- -----` � '^ 11NGH=700FEET
Figure 3. Proposed Zoning for the NE Aubum/Robertson Properties Special Area Plan �'"'°''°��u"��"
�—
i
CI�APT�R 3
LAND USE
Introduction Land use planning enables the Ciry of Aubum to manage its anticipated
growth and development while taldng into consideration the specific
community vision and desires. By designating how land can be used;
tho§e considerations necessary for orclerly growth including the creation of
jobs, the provision of recreational opportunities, strong and stable
neighborhoods and an efficient transportation system can be pursued.
Auburn Today
To better understand and evaluate the:context for the City's future growth,
it is helpful to evaluate the City's existing land use and zoning.
Figure 3.T provides an overview of the zoned acreage within the City of
Auburn and the percentage that acreage represents of the City's overall
land azea Land zoned for residential purposes, especially single family
residential, is cleariy predominant and represents about 49 percent(RG,.
Rl, R5, R7 and R10 zones)of the City's zoned acreage. Of commercial
and industrial zoned land,the Ml (Light Industrial) zone is most
predominant,consisting of 9 percent of tlie zonecl acreage in the city.
Land zoned Pl (Public Use District) is another significant land use zone
consisting of 8.5;percent of the city's zoned acreage.
Page 3=1
A�neade�
�9�FBDraft�'1111
Land Use
Figure 3.1
City of Auburu
Acreage of Land by Zoning District
PERCENTAGE
ZONE ACREAGE OF CITY
RC(Residential Conservancy) 1,481 7.58%
Rl (Residential 1 du/acre) I,405 7.19%
RS (Residential5 du/acre) 4,281 21.92%
R7(Residential 7 du/acre) 2,076 10.63%a
R10(Residential 10 du/acre) 244 1.25%
R20(Residential 20 du/acre)) 608 3.13%
RMHC(Residenrial Mandfactiued/Mobile
Home Units) 455 233%
' RO(Residential Office) 95 0.49%
RO-H(Residential Office Hospital) I.0 0.005°/a
CN(Neighborhood Commercial) 12 0.06% .
, C1 (LightCommercial) 302 1.55%
C2(Crntral Business District) 33 0.17%
DUC(Downtown Urban Center) 135 0.69%.
C3(Heary Commercial) 1,432 733%
BP(Business Pazk) 0 0.00%
EP(Environmental Park) 276 1.41%
M1 (LightIndusqial) 1,762 9.02%
M2(Heary Industrial) 1,099 5.63%
LF (Landing Field) 112 0.57%
P] (Public Use District) 1,665 8.47%
I(Institutional) 584 2.99%
U(Unclassified) 432 221%
PUD(Planned Unit Development) 984 5.04°/a
TV(Terrace View) 59 030°/a
TOTAL 19,533 100%
Source: Ciry of Auburn. Geogaphic Infortnation Services(GIS)
The above data includes azea in the West Hill and Lea Hill annexations.
The small remaining azeas outside of the city litnits but within the:city's
Potential Annexation Area(PAA) aze not included.
BUILDABLE LANDS-LAND SUPPLY AND DEVELOPMENT
CAPACITY
In 1997 the Washington State legislature adopteii a Buildable Lands
amendment to the Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A.215).
The amendment requires certain Washington State counties and their cities
Page 3-2
�de�
�9-18Draft 2011,
I.and Uae
to determine the amount of land suitable for urban development and to
evaluate their capacity for growth based on past development history.
Both Pierce and King Counties are subject to the State Buildable Lands
requirement. In addition, both counties use the Buildable Lands effort to
assist in the allocation of population/housing unit/employaient targets to
individual jurisdictions within the respective counties as required by the
GMA. The first buildable lands reports were based upon data through
2002; the second reports, published in2007, aze cwrent through 2005.
The Buildable Lands analysis involves the identification of vacant and
redevelopable land suitable for development over the planning horizon,
through 2022: Land suitability takes into consideration estimates of how
critical areas, land that might be needed for public purposes(e.g. pazks,
storm drainage), and land needed for future streeu will effect development
of these vacant and redevelopable parcels. It also means adjusting the
amount of vacant and redevelopable land using a mazket factor ordiscount.
factor to exclude land that based on liistorical trends is not reasonably
expected to become available for sale or lease during the planning Horizon.
Land Supply and Housing Unit Capacity
As indicated above, both King and Pierce Counties aze subject to the
State's Buildable Lands legislation. An approximation of Auburn's
development capacity was made through an analysis of all vacant and
underutilized land within the City. Vacant land is defined as any pazcel •
with no stnictures. Underutilized or redevelopable land is defined as a
parcel with potential for infill or redevelopment.
The following summarizes the results and conclusions of these analyses by
counry (King and Pierce). While the objective behind each counties'
Buildable Lands effort was similar,the approaches were slightly different.
Detailed infoi�mation regazding the Buildable Lands analysis may.be fonnd
in the individual Buildable Lands reports prepared by the respective
County.
2007 King County Buildable Lands Analysis
Figure 3.2 identifies the gross and adjusted net vacant and redevelopable
land by residential land use type from the Buildable Lands analysis for
King County. Adjusted net acres represent the amount of gross acres
available for development after assumptions about critical areas, future
. right of way needs; future land for public uses and the market factor have
been considered. (Note: this analysis was based upon the City limits as of
December3l, 2005 and therefore does not include the recent annexations
of Lea and West Hills. The 2007 King County Buildable Lands Report did
Page 3-3
A{xe�ded
�BDraft 2011
Land Use
not provide specific analysis for the lazge Lea Hill and West Hill PAAs
that in 2005,weresrill unincoiporated).
Figure 3.2
Gross and Adjusted Net Acres of Vacant
and Redevelopable Land_by Residential Zoning Type(King Connty)
Gross Acres Adjusted
Net Acres 1
Single Family 1,323.5 888.2
Vacant
Single Family 603.7 349
Redevelo able
1vlulti-Family/ 37 32.5
Mixed Use
Vacant
Mulri-Family/ 145.8 lOZ.9
Mixed Use
Redevelo able
TOTAL 110 1 77.6
Q) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land available for development after
crirical azeas,anricipated rig6t-of-way and public purposes needs and a market factor
have been taken into account.
(2) "Other"represenu mixed-use opportunities in certain zones.
After deducting for constraints, future right-of-way and public pnrpose
needs,and aftei applyiag a market factor,the Buildable Lands analysis
shows thatAuburn has approximately 1,377.5 adjusted net acres of vacant
and redevelopable residenrially zoned land during the planning period
through 2022. As seen in Figure3.2, the majority of available land for
� development is zoned for single-family residential purposes
Based on the residential land supply analysis and historical densities,an
estimate of housing unit capacity was developed: Figure 33 identifies the
estimated capacity (in housing units) in King County by the predominant
zonin�type.. Tfus estimate shows a capaciry ofapproximately 6,525
housing units in the King County portion of the City exists to the year
2022.
Page 3-4
AtneHded
�6kBDraft 2011
Land Use
Figure 33
Hoasing Unit Capacity By Residential Zoning Type(King County)
Capacity
ous' Units
Sin le Famil 3,958
Multi-Famil 2,002
Ivlixed Use 565
TOTAL 6 25
(1) Capacity figures include uniu in the pipeline.
Employment Capacity (King Copnty)
As part of the King Counry Buildable Lands analysis, employment
capacity was also estimated. This methodology involved a similaz
approach as the residential capacity analysis. The supply of both vacant
and redevelopable commercial and industrial land was determined. As
with residential capacity, net land supply for commercial and industrial
purposes took into consideration critical azeas, anticipated future right-of
ways, land for public purposes and applied a market factor to land that
may not be available for development during the planning period.
Estimates of how much commercial and industrial square footage could be
developed on property were calculated. Employment capacity was
developed applying a floor area per employee ratio.
Figure 3.4 identifies the gross and adjusted net vacant and redevelopable
land by commercial and industrial land use from the King County
Buildable Lands analysis. Again,adjiisted net acres represents the amount
of gross acres available for development after assumptions about criUcal
areas constraiats, future right of way needs, land for public uses and the
market factor have been considered.
_ Page 3-5
tknen�e�
�9-�9Draft 2011
Lsnd Use
Figure 3.4
Gross and Adjusted Net Acres of Commenial and Industrial
Land Supply (King County)
Gross Acres Adjusted
Net Acres 1
Commercial 164 136.1
Vacant
Commercial 81.8 66
Redevelo able
Industrial Vacant 499.3 327.3
Industrial 256.9 1763
Redevelo able
Mixed Use 2 1.6
V acant
Mixed Use 56.4 45.5
Redevelo able
TOTAL 1,060.2 i 753
1. "Adjusted Net Acres"�epresenu land aftei eritical areas;futiire anticipated
streets, land for pablic purposes and market factor have tieen considered.
Figure3.4 indicates that approxiinately 1,060 gross acres of vacant and
redeVelopable commercial, industrial and mixed nse zoaed land exists,
with most of this land being industrially zoned. Adjusted for constraints;
future infrastructure needs and a mazket factor, slightly more than 750 net
acres exists.
Figure 3,5 below s��mmah��s employment capacity developed as part of
the Buildable Lands analysis by land use zone type. Itshows thai ttie City
of Auburn has employment capacity for over 17,750 jobs, with a majority
' of those jobs being on industriallyzoned land.
Figure 3S
Employment Capacity by Zoning Type (King County)
Zone T e Em lo ment Ca acit
Commercial 3,559
Industrial 12,053
Mixed Use 736
Other 1 I,410
TOTAL 17,�59
(I)"Other"includes estimates of employment associated with.pipeline projects
identified at the time of[he Buildable Lands analysis.
Page 3-6.,
t�iea�
�9�F8Draft 20 T i
Land Use
Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis
VJhile the overall objective of the Pierce County Buildable Lands analysis
was similar to King County's, certain elements were done differently. 'Ihe
majority of laad within the city iimits at the time of the buildable lands
analysis (Year2005) was part of the Lakeland Hills South Planned Unit
Development(PUD). The majority of the addidonal residenUal vacant
land was part of approved preliminary plafs. Therefore, estunates of
residential population housing uniu were based on planned densities
established as part of the PUD approval and a related annexation
agreement with the developer, and also took in account the other agproved
pmjects.,.Estimates of employmeat.were based on known employment
azeas within the PUD.
Based on the Pierce County Buildable Lands analysis, it was determined
that the City of Auburn's population growth to the yeaz 2022 would be
10,500 people. This t�anslates into the need for approximately 1,789
housing units.
The Pierce County Buildable Lands analysis includes a 2022 employment
targetof403 and.an employment capacity of 543. Tlus estimate was
based on the likely employment generated by the commercial pazcels
located within I.akeland Hills South PUD and other vacant commercial
lands along A.St. SE.
(Specifics regarding the Pierce Counry Buildable Lands analysis may be found in
the"Pierce County Buildable Land Reports—A Monitoring and Evaluation
analysis of Urban Growth and Development Capacity for Pierce County and its
Cities and Towns", Sep[ember 1,2007.)
Evaluation of Canacitv Aeainst Proiected Growth -Tareets
King County and Pierce County both have allocated housing unit and
employment targets to local jurisdictions. These tareeu were recentiv
updated with the revised oonulation forecasu released by the Office of
Financial Manaeement for each countv. The City of Auburn's allocation
targeu aze presented below in Figure 3.68.
Figure 3.6
� City of Auburn 2006-203133 Honsing Unit/Employment/Population
Allocations (King and Pierce counties)
Housiog Units Employment Popalation
Kin Coun Sr,3349 620 G87919 350 N/A
Pierce Caun �89386 4$3206 }93987.950
Page 3-7
�e�
�A�BDraft 2011
Land Use
,:a..i...... von . . :... ..._..e« ....a .. ...,�.... .. ..:... ..t,...e.. i i con
- �
, ..
. ,
�grejeei�ea� Tkiese revised housing and employment target
numbers were updated to assistiurisdictions in fheir comprehensive plan
undates as well as coincide.with the updates to the Countvwide Planning
- Policies. An updated buildable lands report will not be completed until
2012 and at that rime the Ciri will be able to determine its housin��and
emplovment capaciri and whether land use ofianges are waTranted.
Buildable Lands Analvsis Limitations
It is important to note limitations to the Buildable Lands analysis. T&e
Buildable Lands analysis isbased on identifying actual densities for a
five-yeaz period and then applying these densities to adailable land.
Whetfier or not the densiries achieved for the discrete five-yeaz period will
be a true reflection of future densiries is one consideration.. As land
becomes increasingly scarce and land values rise,there will be a tendency
for land to be more intensely used over time with tugher d'ensities.
Also,.how much land could be developed is not a predictor of whether it
will be developed. Ultimately the mazket will dictatehow much land will
be developed. Attempting to predict the market was beyond the scope of
the Buildable Lands analysis.
Issues and Background
Aabnm's Potential
Annezation Area Aubum's Comprehensive Plan contains policies wlrich designate types and
intensities of land uses that will accomplish the Ciry's long range goals.
Since the Plan depicts a long term perspective of the City's growth, it is
appropriate to also include on the Comprehensive Plan map those azeas
which may not currendy be within the City lunits, but aze planned to be in
the future. These azeas are within the city's potential annexation azea
(PAA). (Map I.I). However, due to recent annexarions,the amount of land
remaining within the PAA is relatively small.
The ciry provides water and sewer service to many portions of the PAA.
In addition, growth in the PAA can have.significant unpacts on other City
services. Hence, it is important for City decision makers to conside; the
Page 3-8
?.xieaded
?b+9Draft 201I
land Use
growth in these azeas as well as within the city limits when making.
decisions concerning capital projects such as water and sewer extensions
and road'projects. (For a more thorough discussion of these issues; see
Chapter 13, "Development in the LJmncorporated Areas and Annexation.")
GOAL 5. CITY EXPANSION AND ANNEXATION
To ensure the orderly development and annexarion of the City's potenfial
annexation area in a manner that ensures adequate and cost-effecrive
provision of i�equired ur6an services and facilities, reduces sprawl,
implements the goals, objectives and policies of the Aubum
Comprehensive Plan, and protects designated rural azeas.
Objective 5.1 To desigiate Aubum's potential annexation azea and to include those areas
on the City's Comprehensive Plan Map.
Policies:
LU-1 Aulium's Potential Annexation Area is shown on Map 3.1.
Map 3.1 also depicts Growth Impact Areas. These Crrowth
Impact Areas are generally adjacent cities or unincorporated
Gounty lands in which development that occurs potentially
impacts the city of Auburn..
LU-2 The Aubum City Council may revise the boundaries of the
Potential Annexation Area in the future, in response to:
a. Amendments to the King County Urban Growth Area as
specified in the King Counry Countywide Policies�
b. Discussions between Auburn and adjacent jurisdictions
regarding Potential Annexation Area boundaries;
c: Discussions with Pie=ce County concerning the designarion
ofPoten6al Annexation Area boundaries; or
d. Changed circ»t++Ma*+res relating to population anil
employment growth and projections, urban service
feasibility, or similaz factors.
Urban Form Planning deals with the basic geographic form of the city. Auburn's
existing focro separates the city into two parts: a concentration of
employmetit base on the west with sufficient existing and potential jobs to
be of regional significance (region serving area), and residential and
- - Page 3-9
f��e�a�
�9�FADraft 2011
Land Use
locally oriented business uses to the east (community serving azea). This
existing policy of a "split" form has generally been effective in avoiding
gross land use conflicts between residential uses and more intensive (e.g.
industrial) land uses. This Plan's policies maintain this basic split policy.
However, Auburn's downtown azea is also treated as a unique (both region
and community-serving) part of the city's form.
Another aspect of a city's form is its development intensity. Varying
intensities of development require different configurations of city services
and facilities and create different community impacts. The location of
different intensities can also assist in establiskiing the city's character and
identity, and can be instrumental in furthering other unportant goals
(protection of crirical azeas, protection against natutal hazazds, etc.).
Policy established by the 1969 Comprehensive Plan assumed that the ciry
would eventually be completely urban in characterand the Ciry's approach
to developing its service delivery system was driven by this assumption.
At that time no City policy or program addressed agricultural preservation:.
While extensive areas with rural development require expensive
restructuring of the City service delivery system, strategc long-terin
protection of some of tfiese areas can assist in limiting urban sprawl,
maintaining diversity of living environments, and protecting unportant
environmental resources; in particulaz the City's water source at Coal
Creek Springs. This Plan designates a lunited amount of Residential
Conservancy area for this purpose, which should not significantly affect
the overall cost of city services.
GOAL 6. URBAN FORM
To establish an orderly urban form which sepazates uses on the basis of
their funcrional relationship to the commpnity, and which reinforces the
identity of the community.
Objective 6.1. To physically sepazate region serving employment centers and other
regionally oriented land uses from azeas that are residential or local in
character while ensuring that re�ional facilities strengthen the community
as a whole and enhance downtown Auburn.
Policies:
LU-3 Areas on the valley floor which aze suitable to support large
scale economic development projects should be reserved, for
the most part, for uses which support Aubum's role as a
regional employment and commercial center (to be lmown as ,.
the Region Serving Area-- See Map 3.2).
Page 3-10
I �
�9�F8Draft 2011
Land Use
LU-4 Areas delineated on the Urban Form Map (Map 3.2) as the
Community Serving Area,should be reserved for uses whicfi
aze local in character or serve local markets.
LU-5 Link together regioaally significant land uses such as the
SuperMall, Crreen River Community College, Boeing; Emerald
Downs, and commercial uses on Aubum Way in a manner that
enhances the regional stature of Auburn while providing
services, employment and tax base for the community.
Linkages should be designed to enhance Downtown Aubum as
t6e community's focal point.
Objective 6.2. Maintain downtown as an azea that uniquely serves both regional and
community needs.
Policies:
LU-6 The downtown urban center shall be the focal point of the
Aubum community. It should include a mix of uses including,
butnot limited to, govemment and civic uses, retail, residential
and services that are appropriate to fill that role.
LU-6A Focus gowth and development in the Auburn Downtown
urban center to support economic development, complement
t�ansit oriented development, direct growth pressures away
from single family residential neighborhoods, and implement
regional g�owth management strategies.
Objecdve 6.3. To protect communiry identity while promoting diversity and conseivin�
rural amenities,by designating rural areas along the city's periphery and in
areas with significant environmental values.
Policies:
LU-7 The City shall support the_ County agricultural progam in
securiag the developmenf rights to strategically located parcels,
especially along the noithem city boundary and at the start of
the Upper Green River Valley.
LU-8 The City should limit acces§ible Ciry uriliry systems into the
Upper Green Valley, anti sball limit density, thus preserving
the character of the aTea and encouraging continued cultivation
on these pmperties.
Page 3=11,
t�men�e�
�9�9Draft 2011
Land Use
LU-9 The Ciry shall- protect Coal Creek Springs by: 1) limiting
density to less than one residential unit per four acres within
the area tributary to the Coal Cieek Springs Watershed and by
2) designating a Special Planning Area for the Mt. Rainier
Vista site.
LU-10 The City shall support low density County wning acljacent to
the city on the Enumclaw Plateau Agricultural District and will
not e�ctend City sewer and water facilities into the area if_it will
pmmote urban development.
LU-I1 The City sk�all consider the ixnpacts of new development
activities on resources (including agricultural resource lands,
cultural resources, forest resource lands, and mineral resource
areas (Map 9.4)), tt►e environment and natural resources
(particulazly critical azeas, wildlife habitats and water quality)
as part of iu environmental review process.
Objective 6.4 Maintain low-density `�uban sepazators" azeas which protect
environmentally sensitive areas and create openspace corridors within and
between urban areas, consistent with the King County Countywiile
PlanningPolicies.
Policy:,
LU-12 The City shall maintain urban sepazators in the Lea Hill area as
designated by King Counry.
Residential
Development Within most communities, a range of housing densities is allowed to
provide a variety of housing opportunities. The wider the range, the
greater the opportunity for inclividuals to fmd fiousing relative to their
particulaz needs, affordabiliry and preference.
While the City's policy provides for a relatively wide range of residential
densities, development over the past decade has been heavily concentrated
towazd the middle and upper levels of the range{See discussion in Chapter
4,Housing Element).
As land costs have escalated in the region, however, Aubum has remained
relatively affordable to the average fanuly.
' This Plan provides that: tfie City should seek to restore the traditional
chaazacter of the commtinity by encouraging preservation and development
. of housing that is suitable to ihe retention and aftraction of families wittiin
the community. This would be best accomplished by focusing multi-
Page3-I2
�.�eeded
28�9Draft 2011
Land Use
family development in the urFian center, protecting the residential
character of existing single family neigliborhoods and promoung the
development of new neighborhoods of single family homes:.
Consequeatly, residential land use policies will emphasize the creadon and
preservation of single family neigh6orhoods, wlule still encouraging the
development of other housing types for those who need or want them.
GOAL 7. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
To emphasize housing development at single family densities, in order to
reestablish a mix of housing types appropriate for a family oriented
community, wlvle recognizing the need and desire for both lower density
and higher density housing appropriately located to meet the housing
needs of all members of the community.
Objective 7.1. To establish a system of residenrial densities that accommodates a range
of housing choices appropriate for the city.
Policies:
LU-13 The City should promote the provision, preservation and
maintenance of adequate housing for the city's residents by
encouraging a balanced mix of housing types and values
appropriate to the income levels and lifestyles of azea residenu.
Aubum has always been willing to accept iu "fair share" of
low and moderate cost housing opportunities. However, this
has lranslated into a great disparity in Puget Sound
communities with cities such as Auburn receiving more of
these types of housing ttian other comparable communities.
This has had impacts in terms of the costs of ineeting human
service needs as well as ;some poorly maintained multifamily
properties which have caused a variety of problems. Auburn
will work to insure that housing units aze equitably distributed
acrossthe region in terms of both physical location and wst
LU-14 Residential densities in azeas designated "residential
coriservancy", which represent areas that have environmental
constraints or wluoh promote protection of City water sources,
sh_ould be no greater than 1 dwelling unit per 4 acres until such
time public facilities are available. Where it is found through a
lancl use approval pmcess to be supportive of the purpose of
the "�esidential conserdancy" desigiation, where it does not
substantially adversely iaipact the. surrounding residential
cotnmunity and demonstrates compliance to developmeat
Page 3-13
,4t�en�e�
�&}Blhaft 20I1
� Land Use
� standards specified in the zoning code, agricultural uses and
� limited commercial uses in support of agricultural uses may be
allowed with appropriate environmental protection.
LU-15 The azea designated "residential conservancy" allows for a
lifestyle similaz to that of rural areas since the lower density
established protects the critical areas such as the City's Coal
Creek Springs watershed. A n�raC lifestyle generally includes
allowance of farm animals, streets not urban in chazactei (e.g.
I no sidewalks, street lights only at intersectionsl, and limited
agicultural type uses. The "residearial conservancy" also
allows appropriate-scale commercial activity in snpport of
agricultural uses where it is found through a land use approval
process to be supportive of the purpose of the "residential
, conservancy" designation, where it does not substantially
adversely impact the surrounding residential coiririmunity and
demonslrates compliance to development standards specified in
the zoning code.
LU-16 Residential densities within designated "urban separators"
should be no greater than 1 dwelling unit per acre. Clustering
ofallowed densiry onto a portion of a site should be favorably
considered.
LU-17 Residential densities in azeas designated for single family
residential use should be no greatec than 7 uniu per net acre.
These azeas should be served with good transit availability (1/4
mile or less to a route with at least half hour seivice).
Accessory dwelling units should be pernutted to allow
increased densities. The bulk of the single fanuly residential
community should be developed at a density of between 4 and
7 dwelling uniu per net acre. Increased densiry is acluevable
through flexible development standards, if certain criteria are
met,as established in ciry code.
LU-18 Residential densities in azeas designated for multiple family
development should not exceed 20 units per net acre. Multiple
family densities should generally decrease witfi proximity to
single family areas. Multiple family densities may exceed 20
uniu per acre provided they aze within"walking distance ofl/4
mile from regional transit facilities or are targeted to
populations not ;equiring outdoor recreation azeas and having
low private automobile usage (e.g. nursing homes). T'hese
targeted developments should be located in close proximity to
shopping, medical and public transporfation services.
Page 3-14
�n�axded
�9-F9Draft 201 I
Lantl Ose
Increased density is achievable through flexible development
standards; if certain criteria aza met, as established in city code:
Objective 7.2. To designate land for the development of new single family homes.
Policies:
LU-19 In applying the land use designations of the Comprehensive
Plan, first consideration sha11 be given to designating an azea
for single family residential use.
LU-20 Most of the undeveloped areas of the Community Serving Area
of the city (see Map 3.2) shalk be reserved for single family
dwellings. The ability to buffer the area from incompatible
land uses and heavily traveled arterials or highways should be
considered in designaiing currendy undeveloped azeas for
future single family use. Such buffering can be accomplished
6y taking advantage of topographic variations and other natural
features, requiring expanded setbacks along arterials, by
orienting lots and houses away from arterials, by designating
moderate density multiple family areas as transitional areas,
and by other means.
Objective 23. To promote the development of quality single family neighborhoods
which relate the design and types of residential azeas to important natural
� and manmade features.
Policies:
LU-21 Residential development should be related to topography,
circulation, and other amenities, as guided by policies of this
. Plan.
LU-22 Residential development should be discouraged in poorly
drained areas.
LU-23 � The development of new neighborhoods should be governed by
development' standards which allow some flexibility.
Flexibility should be considered to encourage compact urban
, development, to provide protection of critical azeas and
� resource lands (including,. but not limited to, agricultural
resoiuce lands, cultural resources, forest resource 7ands,
� mineral resource areas (Map 9.4) hillsides or wetlands), and to
facilitate non-motorized transportation. Increased density is
Page 3-15
� � �eH3en�e�
�8}BDraft 2011
Land Use
achievable through flexible development standazds, if certain
criteria are met, as established in city code.
LU-24 The development of residential areas should recognize the
importance of community and public faciliries in developing a
sense of neighborhood and community.
LU-25 Residential development of shoreline azeas shalI be in accord
with the City's Shoreline Management Program and should
provide for the retention of public access to these areas.
Special care should be taken in the design of residential. areas
in shoreline areas to reduce the potential conflict between
residential use and'public access.
LU-26 Emphasis shall be_ placed upon the: manner in which the
recreational needs of the residents shall be met in the approval
of any residential development.
LU-27 Any change from the residential conservancy designation shall
be to a single family designation. Single family residential
areas should also be used to buffer rural areas from other urban
uses. _ _ _
LU-28 Areas abutting major arterials should be cazefully planned to
avoid potential conflict between the development of the arterial
and single family uses. Single faauly uses in such areas should
be platted in a manner which orients the units away from the
arterial. Wliere such orientation is not possible, a tran§ition
azea shonld be allowed for non-single family use"s wtrich
reduce total driveway connections to the a;terial. Ia any case,
non-motorized access between residential areas and arterials
, should be provided. In azeas with existing single family
, developments, substantial flexibility can be pernutted for street
front buffering.
Objective 7.4. To establish new neighborhoods in a way that will **+inim;�P the potential
for intrusion of inwmpatible uses.
Policies:
LU-29 Development design should utilize and preserve natural
features, including, but not ('united to, topography and stands of
trees,to separate incompatible land uses and densities..
Page 3-16
r}�uen�e�
' �A}9Draft 2011
_ Land Use_
LU-30 Development design should use open spaces, including pazks,
to separate incompatible uses.
LU-31 Development codes shall be modified to allow the Ciry to
requi=e that landscaped buffers, natural area preservation or
other measures are utilized to separate new residential
developments from incomparible uses and major streets. Ttiese
buffers should permit access between the residential area and
the major street by pedestrians and bicyclists.
Mnitiple Family
Housing The escalating gap between the costs of housing and the ability to pay
rental or mortgage prices has increased the demand for multi-family units.
Unfoitunately, it is cleaz that the development of multiple family
dwellings iri single family areas has created an adverse reaction. T'he level
of conflict 6etween single family neighborhoods and multiple family
dwellings must be reduced. Since much of this reaction is related to the
design of these structures, design standazds could substantially reduce this
problem for new construction.
Objective 7.5. To meet the need,for multiple family dwellings while avoiding conflict
with single family residential azeas.
Policies:
LU-32 In considering where firture higher density development should
locate, priority shall be given to desigiated Special Planning
Areas (where such use can be balanced and planned with single
faauly azeas), the Downtown and azeas with high levels oE
transit service. �
LU-33 Unless required for other purposes, the need for new higher
density developments shall be based on local need for such
units.and should not substantially exceed a fair regional share
of such housing.
LU-34 Multiple-family developments shonld be located functionally
convenient to the necessary supporting facilities including
utilities, arterials,pazks,transit service, etc.
LU-35 Design codes and. guidelines aze developed for multifamily
, housing to ensure high qaaliry design and compatibility with .
surrounding developmeat. These standatds should be reviewed
Page 3-17
�
�9�FBDraft 2011
land Use
periodically to remain consistent with planning trends and
mazket demands.
LU-36 Multiple family dwellings shall not be permitted as a matter of
right in single family residential districts, but should be
pernutted only where necessary to remove potential blight, to
buffer single family uses from incompatible uses or activities,
or to allow effective use of vacant azeas. Standards for such
siting should provide for design review to ensure compatibility
and provide that the densiry of development is consistent with
the density of the adjoining single family uses.
LU-37 Siting of moderate density units sha11 be encouraged as a 6uffer
between single family azeas and more intense uses. Sucfi
buffering is appropriate along arterials where existing plafting
prevents effective lot layout for single family units. Also,such
bufFering is appropriate between sin�le family areas and
commercial and industrial uses. Where there are established
single family azeas, the design and siting of moderate density
units shall be controlled to reduce potential conflicts and to en-
sure buffering of uses. Higher densiry units aze not to be
considered such a buffer.
LU-38 Higher density developments or lazger scale multiple facnily
developments should be limited to residential areas where they
can be developed as a unit with the necessary supporting
facilities. Such development shall provide adequate access by
developed arterials with minimal pbtential to generate uaf�ic
through single family azeas. Extensive buffering measures
shall be requved where such azeas adjoin single family
residential azeas. Care should be exercised to avoid creating
barriers to pedestrian and bicycle movement. Where feasible,
new multiple family development should be planned in
conjunction with single family and moderafe density
development.
Manafactured
, Homes Manufactured homes provide affordable housing to many Aaburn
residents. In many cases,they provide the oppominity of home owaership.
to households which cannot afford to purchase more traditional types of
housing. However, poorly designed, higli density manufactured home
pazks can raise the same issues ttiat multiple family developments pose.
Page 3-18
fl+Nentle�
36F9Draft 2011
LaOd Use _ _
Cai8ful design and placement of manufactured housing in parks especially
with appropriate landscaping, cau greatly reduce pmblems associated with
such development.
Ttus Plan's policies continue to recognize the benefiu that manufactured
homes can have on housing afforda6ility. Improved codes requiring lugh �
standards for tfie design and siting of manufactured home pazks-and units
on individual lots should be implememed.
Objective 7.6 To continue to allow manufactured homes as an affordable form of home
bwnership, provided that such ilevelopa►ents aze carried out in a manaer
which supports rather than dehacts from the quality of the community and
adjacent uses.
Policies:
LU-39 T1ie siting of new manufactured home parks shall be subject to
the same policies applicable to high density residential
development. Manufactured home pazk densi6es should not
eicceed 8 units per acre. New manufactured home parks shall
be bordered or contained by physical features, or planned and
designed as part of a larger development incorporating other
housing types in a manner which limits further manufachued
home pazk expansion into adjacent azeas.
LU-40 Manufactured homes shall be permitted on single family lou
pmvided that they aze:sited and consh�ucted in a manner which
would blend with adjacent homes. Manufactured homes must
be new units, meet m;r,;r„um dimensional standards (double
wide) and be placed on pecmanent foundations, consistent with
State law.
Moderate and High
Income Housing The City wants to increase the amonnt of housing oriented toward those
with moderate and lugh incomes. A jurisdicdon typically encouiages a
type of development by pmyiding incentives wlvch lower the cost of
producing that development type; thereby increasing its poteatial
profitability.. With the limiteil financial resources available to
municipalities it is difficult to justify financial incentives to increase the
profitability of the production ofmarket rate housing. Further, since the
production of housing for moderate and higher income groups is profitable
without these incentives, it is not cleaz that incentives will have the desired
effect of increasing the number of houses produced.
... P�3_�9 .
�
�&18Draft 2011
Land Use
Potential solurions to tkris issue need to address the demand side of tt►e
market rather than the supply. The mazket will provide these types of
housing if there is sufficient demand for it within the ciry. Aubum can
increase the demand for housing by those with moderate an_d higher
incomes by improving its image within the region and making itself
known as a desirable place to live. A comprehensive approach to
increasing the demand for moderate and high income housing is tfirough
the implementation of this comprehensive plan. By building a community
with pazks and open spaces,job opportunides, high environmenfal quality;
and abundant supportive�services includin� commuter rail, Auburn will ..
create for itself a more desirable image witHin the region and tlierefoie a
wider range of income groups will choose to live in Auburn.
Policy:
LU-41 Development regulations should ensure that Au6ucn obtains its
"fair share" of high end single family housing. This does not
represent a decrease in Aubum's commihnent to maintaining
the majority of iu housin� stock as housing affordable to
middle income households.
NeighliorLood
Quality Aubum's existing stable residential neighborhoods form an important
component of the communiry's chazacter. Maintaining the vitality and
stability of these neighborhoods is a key goal of this Comprehensive Plan.
GOAL 8. NEIGHBORHOOD QUALII'Y
To maintain and protect all viable and stable residential neighborhoods.
Objective 8.1 To maintain and enhance all viable and stable residential neighborhoods.
Policies
LU-42 Regulatory decisions in all residential neighborhoods shall
result in maintenance or enhancement of the neigtiborhood's
residential character.
a The location of uses other than those permitted outright
shall only be allowed as specified in this compreliensive
plan and in the zoning code.
b. Approval of any non-residential land use sk�all occpr only
after a public hearin�process.
Page 3-20
Amee�ed
?9�1&Draft 201 I
Land Use
c. The City recognizes the important role that public facilities
(such as sidewalks, neighborhood.parks an3 elementary
schools) and limited scale quasi-publio- uses (suoh as
smaller churches and daycare centers) play in maintaining
viable residential neighborhoods.
d. Single family detached residential neighborhoods should be
� protected from_ intrusion by non-residential or lazge scale
multi-family uses.
LU-43 T'he City shall seek to abate existing incompatible uses in
residential neighborhoods. Mineral extraction operations
within mineral resource areas (Map 9.4) operating in
compliance with the conditions of their pernut aze not
incompatible uses.
LU-44 Home occupations , in residential neighborhoods shall be
pernutted only if they comply with performance standards that
ensure compatibility with adjacent residenrial uses.
LU-45 Limited agricultural uses and commercial uses (such as daycaze
centers) may be permitted as a principal' use, but only under
appropriate conditions; by means of conditional use or
administrative use permits when landscaping and design
features can be used to m;;,;.r,;�e impacts on surrounding uses
and the site is:
a. Along the border of residential neighborhoods; or
b. In specific areas: where site specific conditions may limit
the use of the site fdr residential uses; or
c. Along arterials iransecting residential neighborhoods.
LU-46 Development standards and regulations for residential azeas
, should avoid unnecessary barriers to the renovation and
improvement of homes in established neighborhoods built to
previous standazds.
LU-47 The City should give special attention to improving the quality
of low income neighborhoods and seek to implement programs
which encourage rehabilitation of deteriorating st�vctures and
facilities in such neighborhoods. (Guidance for this policy is
provided by the City's aiinual Block Grant Program Plan.)
Page 3-21
„_.._�..�
rv„v�oa>
�9�9Draft 2 tl
. Land:Use
Objective 8.2 To provide for the orderly transiuon to other uses of older residential areas
that are no longer viable.
Policies:
LU-48 The management of azeas in transition from existing residences
to a planned non-residential use, should balance the needs of
existing residents with the need to accommodate new uses.
LU-49 Greater flexibiliry should be provided for home occupations in
transitional azeas.
LU-50 Whenever considering a conversion from single family to
another use, the applicant's burden shall be on demonstrating
the unsuitaliility of an azea for continued single family use.
Commercial
Development Commercial land development provides needed services and jobs to
Au6urn and re�ional residenu and visitors. Further, it is a major
component of Aubum's tax base through the sales tax arid property taxes it
generates.
There aze several different types of commercial land, each providing
different types of services and jobs. The discussion and policies that
follow recognize the importance of each of these types of commercial
development arid the important role that they,play.
GOAL 9. COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
To maintain and establish a variety of commercial environments which
provide the ful] range of commercial services to the community and region
in a manner which reduces conflicts between different types of
commercial services and other uses.
Neighborhood Commercial
Small commercial centers within or adjacent to residential-neighborfioods
serve a useful function in providing convenient access to neighborhood
residents for their "everyday" or "convenience" shopping needs. These
' centers can serve to reduce the number of automobile trips or at least
shorten them by providing services neaz one's residence. For
neighborhood centers to provide these benefits, attention must be paid to
Page 3-22
�nat�de�
39-F9Draft 2011
I.and Use
ensuring adequate access to these centers from the adjacent neighborhood..
However, these commercial areas can also adversely affect a
neighborhood by generating traffic and land use conflicts.
Due largely to the extensive commercialization of Aubum Way and the
north/south orientation of ttie developed portions of Aubum, few
residential neighborhoods within the city lie more than several blocks
from a commercial area. Significant, outlying commercial centers have
also been developed, so that the currently developed residential
neighborhoods are adequately served. However, future lazge scale
residential developments will create a need for new small-scale
commei�cial centers. This Plan's policy toward neighborhood comti►eicial
centers balances needs for shopping convenience with the protecuon of
residential neighborhoods, and seeks to lunit the development of new
inappropriate comaiercial strips.
Objective 9.1. To provide for tfie convenierice commercial needs of residential azeas,
while pmtecting existing and future residenrial neighborhoods from the
disruptive effects of commercial intrusions.
Policies:
LU-51 Existing neighborhood oriented commercial centers should be
identified and designated. Commercial uses within these
ceaters should be limited to those having primary market areas
considerably smaller tl�an the entire community.
LU-52 Designated neighborhood commercial centers sliould be
prevented from spreading along the arterials that serve them.
LU-53 A prime consideratioa in permitting the expansion of existing
neighborhood commercial areas shall be the ability to
adequately buffer any nearby residences from disruptive
impacts.
LU-54 In some instances of existing neighborhood commercial
centers, a transition zone of moderate density residential uses
should be designated between the center and single family
residential azeas.
LU-55 New neighborhood commercial centers should be consideted
under the "Special Planning Areas" concept. Such areas should
be cazefully designed and integrated into the overall azea
development plan so as to minimize traffic and land use
conflicts. Commercial uses should be 1'united to those having
Page'3-23
�nende�
�81bDraft 2011
- . � Laud Use
primary mazket azeas approximately the size of the special
planning area.
LU-56 Consideration should be given to providing adequate access to
neighborhood commercial development by non-motorized
modes such as walking and biking. Bazriers to these modes
such as walls and fences should be removed when possible and
shall be avoided in new development.
Mixed Use Centers
Commercial centers at times can through a proper mix of bses be
integrated with residenual components. These aux use centers serve in
providing convenient services, altemative living environments, and
efficient use of both land and infrastructure..
Objective 9.2 To provide where appropriate mixed use of commercial and residential
development designed to assure compatibility of uses inside the
commercial center and adjacent residential neighborhoods
Policy:
LU- 57 Mixed-use developmenu with both commercial and residential
components are encouraged in Light Commercial centers.
These developments should include primarily retail stores and
offices designed to provide convenient shopping and other
services for neazby residenu. Industrial and heavy commercial
usesshould be excluded.
Design features of mixed-use developments should include the
integation of the retail and/or office uses and residential uniu
within the same building or on the same parcel. Ground level
spaces should be built and used predominately to accommodate
retail and office uses. Off-street parking should be located
behind or to the side of the buildings, or enclosed within
buildings. Accessible pedestrian connections and bicycle paths
must be designed to facilitate safe connections within the
development, along adjacent roads adjacent and to adjacent
residential developments.
Design guidelines for mixed-use development have ,been
developed. These guidelines should be reviewed and amended
periodically to be consistent with current planning trends and
mazket demands.
Page 3-24
Aea�ende�
?&lADraft 2011
Land Use_
Highway Commercial
While commercial uses along arterials (often called "strip commercial"
development) provide important services to community residents, the
proliferation of commercial uses along arterials raises several land use
planning issues. On the negative side, slrip commercial dedelopment
creates ttaffic flow pmblems and conflict with adjacent land uses, Due to
their "lineaz" nature, commercial strips result in a mxcimum azea of
contact between commercial uses and other land uses resulting in a high
potential for land use conflicts. Poor visual character due to excessive
signage and' architectural styles designed to attract attention instead of
promoting a sense of community is an addi6onal concern. Pedestrian
� shopping is made difficult, resulting in greater generation of automobile
traffic, and lazge fields of asphalt parking lots are needed to accommodate
single purpose vehicle trips.
Despite the problems associated with commercial development along
arterials,many such locations are often quite unsuitable for other uses, due
to the impacts associated with heavy traffic volumes. Also, many
commercial uses thrive at such locations due to high visibility and
, accessi6ility. The Plan seeks to manage existing arterial commercial areas .
to take advantage of the accessi6ility they provide, while minimi�ing
trat�ic and land use conflicts and improving their visual appearance
through an enhanced design review process and development standards.
ObjectiVe 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of azeas adjacent to heavily traveled
arterials while m;n;,r�;zing land use and traffic conflicts by:
1. Managing the continued commercial development of existing
commercial arterials in a manner which minimizes traffic and land use
� conflicts.
2. Conserving residential qualities along heavily traveled arterials whic6
aze not yef commercialized, by restricting commercial development to
types wluc5 provide an apprbpriate buffer.
3_Protectiag ezisting, viable residential azeas along lesser-craveled
arterials;from commercial development.
4. Concentratepopulation and emplovment growth within the seven kev
economic-development strategY-azeas within the Citv identified as
follows:
• Aubuin-Wav North Corridor
Page 345
rlx+ea�e� '
�9�9Draft 2011
Land Use
o Auburn Wav South Comdor
• Urban Center
e Auburn Environmental Pazk and Green Zone
• TS°i Street SW/C Street SW/West Vallev Highway/Supermall
• A Street SE Corridor
• SE 312w Street/124`� Avenue SE Corridor
• M Street SE between Aubum Way North and Auburn Wav South.
Policies:
LU-58 The Ciry sl�-i�eaE'r€}°has identified those existing comtnercial
arterials that aze appropriate for continued gexer�--(�kes�y-)
commercial development and emplovment growth:as-well-as a
concentration of gopulation growth. These areas are identified
as the seven economic development strate�v areas as'identified
under Obiective 93. Sub-area plans for these sh�ategy azeas
should be developed.:,
LU-59 The Ciry shall review its standazds relating to the number, size
and location of driveways to ensure consistency with goals and
policies relating fo arterial commercial development.
LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual
commercial enterprises along commercial arterials to promote
the sharing of parking azeas, access drives and sigus. Such
gouping can be encouraged thrbugh land division regulations,
sign regulauons and development standards.
LU-61 Moderate density multiple family residential development shall
be used to buffer general (heavy) commercial arterial
development from single family development. Extensive
screening and landscaping sha1T be used to buffer general
commercial uses from mulriple family uses. However, the
placement of walls and fences and site designs which pre"vent
easy access by bicyclists and pedestrians should beavoided.
LU-62 Arterials experiencing strong presswe for comme;cial
development, but not yet committed to .geaer•e�--Ekeav�y�
commercial uses, shall be designated .for mixed �tt--use
commercial and �a�e—hieh density multi-family uses.
Development regulations should encourage the development bf
� professional office and similar uses and �mulriple
family housing, with development and design standa;ds
Page 3-26
�knaen�led
�9�9Draft 2011
Lsnd Use
cazefiilly drawn to ensure preservation of a quality living
environment in adjacent neighborhooiis. �er+e}e�ea�
,
.:a .. ..:..... .. ......:>.... _ __ _
.. ., e
LU-63 Residential arterials having good potential for long term
maintenance of a quality living environment should be
protected from the intrusion of commercial uses. In some
instances, these may be appropriate locations for churches°and
other religious institutions, or moderate density multiple family
uses.
LU-64 Newly developed arterials shall incorporate design features;
and development of adjacent land shall be managed such that
creation of new commercial strips is avoided. Land division
regulations shall result in single family residences being
oriented away from ttie arterial, with access provided by a non-
arterial street.
I LU-65 � ' ' _ong the Aubum Way South
Corridor. emplovment and population gr�should be limited
to north of the R Street SE overpass.
LU-66 The City should develop designstandards and.guidelines for
development along arterials to improve their visual appearance.
The Regional SuperMall
The development of the "SuperMall of the Great Northwest on 155 acres
neaz the jancrion of SR167 and SR18 in the 1990's has led to a
"destination" mall attracting consume=s from long distanoes.
During the Mall's development review, a number of issues were raised.
Included in these issues were the impacts of the SuperMall on Auburn
downtown and the possibility of coaimercial sprawl around the SuperMall
that would exacerbate impacts to the downtown and traffic around the
SuperMall. �
Since that time, several factors have changed. Aubum's downtown, as a
designated urban center, has developed a more specific vision for the
community. Alsb, it is not expected that the SuperMall will develop to its
max;mum square footage and retail commercial uses have become a more
important local government revenue source.
Page 3-27
tlmencle�
�A}9Draft 2011
Land Use
The City should continue its commitment to the SuperMall's development
as a regional amaction, and take advantage of the SuperMall's presence to
complement strateges related to downtovv�preservation and development.
Objective 9.4. To capture the retail mazket of customers visiting the SuperMall and
strengthen Aubum's role as a major retail commercial center for the
region.
Policies:
LU-67 Support commercial development around the SuperMall that
complements its role as a regional shopping center as well as
future redevelopment that could include hi h�ty housing.
LU-68 The City will oppose the development of a regional shopping
center in the unincorporated azeas in the vicinity of the city.
LU-69 1'he City will seek ways to draw customers from the SuperMall
into the downtown and other azeas within the city.
LU-70 The City shall con6nue to recognize and support the
development of downtown Auburn as a focal point of the
Auburn community.
Downtown
Auburn Downtowns have historically served as the business, cultural and
govemmental focal points of their communities: In many communities
(like Aubum) this role has been challenged by new shopping pattems
focused on regional malls and commercial areas outside of the downtowri.
Maintaining a healthy and vital downtown Auliurn c.ontinues to be
important as it is recosnized by residenu as a focal point of the com-
muniry and an important element of the Ciry's identity.
In May 2001, the Aubum City Council adogted the Auburn Downtown
Plan. The Auburn Downtown Plan is the City's updated slrategy to
continue its downtown revitalization efforts consistent with State, regional
and iocal growth management planning concepts and st�ategies. The
Auburn Downtown Plan, and this Plan, provides that Downtown Auburn
should remain the commercial, cultural and govemmental focal point for
the community. Efforts to entiance this function for powntown Aubum
aze strongly supported.
The Auburn Downtown Plan is based on implementing policies and
strate�ies through partnerships and innovative techniques. The City, the
Page 3=28
�ende�
�8-}9Draft 201 I
Land Use _
downtown business community aad members of the community at-lazge
will need to work closely together to maintain and upgrade the quality of .
the downtown working, living'and shopping environment.
Part of the impetus for developing new sirategies to approach downtown
revitalization is the development of the Sound Transit Commnter Rail
Transit Station. The Auliurn Downtown Plan seeks to build on the
excitement and energy resulting from public investment in the Transit
Station and in other public investments such as the Third Street Grade
Separation project:
The Auburn Downtown Plan envisions downtown as an urban center.
Designation as an urban center was achieved in 2004. Aubum's urban
center:
• Establishes a 220 acre planning area that is the focus for downtown
redevelopment.
• Provides incentives for downtown development and redevelopment
through policy direction that supports:
-Elimination of transportation impact fees;
-Elimination of stormwater improvements for
redevelopment of existing sites that do not result in an
inctease in impervious surfaoe;
-Lower level of service for transportation facilities; and,
-Reduction in the off-street parking requirements compared
to other areas in the city.
o Encourages non-motorized pedestrian and bicycle connections and
� link�es fo and within the urlian center area.
• Encourages protection of historic assets and resources from
redevelopment activities.
• Identifies potential catalyst projects and sites to spur development
activity in the downtown and better focus redevelopment and
mazketing efforts.
• Enconrages more residential de4elopment downtown and also 24-
hour type uses and nighttime activity.
• Seeks to remove undesirable land uses and other blighting
influeaces in the downtown area
• Promotes s�eet improvements and enhancements to improve access
and the visual qualities of the streetscape.
In eazly 2007, the City established a newzoning district for the majority of
downtown, the Downtown Urban Center (DUC) district. Unlike other
zones, this district allows all types of land uses unless specifically
prolribited. In addition, it regulates the intensity of development by
allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and provides incentives for higher
Page 329
�l+nea�ed
�9Draft 2011 '
Land Usc
intensity of use. The DUC zone also features relaxed pazlang standards
from those found in other zone dishicts and by reference, adopted'Design
Standards to ensure a hi�h quality of development in the downtown area:
GOAL 10 DOWNTOWN
To encourage development and redevelopment withixi Downtown Auburn
which reflects its unique chaiazacter as the community's historic centei, that
is consistent with the Auburn Downtown Plan's vision for powntown
Auburn as an urban center within King Counry and the Puget Sound
region.
Objective 10.1 To preserve and enhance the role of downtown Auburn as the focal point
of the Auburn communiry for business, governaiental and cultural
acrivities.
Policies:
LU-7i For the purpose of implementing the goal and policies for
downtown Aubum, "downtown" shall generally be c.onsidered
that azea bounded on the south by Highway 18; on the east by
"F" Sueet; on the north by Pazk Avenue (extended);and on tt►e
west 6y the Union Pacific tracks. (See Map 33)
LU-72 Auburn's urban center/regional growth center boundaries shall
be those esta6lished as the planning area for the Aubum
Downtown Plan adopted May 2001 (See Map 3.4).
LU-73 Implement the policies and strategies of the Auburn Downtown
Plan to support development of Auburn's urban center:
LU-74 Encourage the attainment of urban center growth foreoasts
through implementation of higher int8nsity development xo
achieve the efficient use of land.
LU-75 Downtown shall continue to be recognized as the liusiaess,
govemmental and cultural focal point of the community. A
diversity of uses including multifamily residentia] should 6e
encouraged to maintain a vibrant, active and competitive center
for the City of Aubum.
LU76 The City should continue to support the development and
rehabilitation of multiple family housing in the Downtown, as
part of mixed use projects.
Page 3-30
I �
�9}ODraft 2011
Land Use
LU-77 The City shall maintain an ongoing downtown planning and
action program involving the downtown business community
and other interested groups. This activity should be guiiied 6y
this Plan and the Auburn Downtown Plan.
LU-78 The City shall continue to give priority consideration to the
maintenance and improvement of public facilities and,services
in the downtown azea.
Downtown Land Uses
Objective 10.2 To recoguze azeas within the downtown that have identifiable characters
and uses.
LU-79 The azea north of First Street North, west of Au6urn.Avenue,
south of Fifth Street.Nortli and east of the Burlington Northern
tracks should be designated and managed as a mediaal and.
professional services azea. New heavy commercial and
industrial uses should be pmhibited and existing ones
amortized. Commercial uses suppoRing medical and'
professional uses should receive priority.
LU-80 To increase consistencv witfi the Urban Center boundarv, t�lie.
area lying generally east of"D" Street S.E. to "F" Street S.E.
and south of Main Street (not including the Main Street.
frontage) to SR 18 shall be designated for auxed residential
and commercial uses.
LU-81 The area lying generally between Auburn Way North (but not
properties abutting AVVIV) and Aubum High School should be
, desi�ated for multiple family residential uses.
LU-82 Automobile oriented uses within the Downtown Urban Center
shall be developed and located in accordance with the policy
direction of the Aubum Downtown Plan and implementing
DiJC, Downtown Urban Center code requirements.
LU-82.A Tlie azea lying generallv south of East Main Street (not
includinp the IVIain Street frontage� and east of �e-3�sEiee
�e�£e� "F" Street S.E: shall .be maintained as a sinale family
residential azea.
Downtown Urban Design
_ Page3-3 T
I �e�
2&}8Drn8 20l l
Land Use
Objective 10:2: To ensure that all new development and redevelopment in the dowdtown
reflect the unique chazacter of the area
LU-83 The City sha1T develop progams and ordinances to preserve
and pmtect downtown's historic character. Development codes
should be revised as needed to recognize the uniqueness of
downtown through appropriate performance standards :and
design guidelines. A high level of visual amenity should be:
pursued, and no heavy outdoor uses or outdoor storage should
be allowed.
LU-84 The downtown area shall be comprised of a mixture of uses
consistent with the azea's role as the focal point of the
community. These uses shall be primarily "people-oriented" as
opposed to "automobile-oriented", and sha1T include
commercial, meclical; governmental, professional services,
cultural and residential uses.
LU-85 Regulations for the retail core of downtown should encourage
retail uses, but should discourage uses which result in a lrigh
proportion of single use vehicle trips (such as fast food
restaurants and drive-through windows).
Dawntown Transportation
Objective 10.3: To emphasize pedesirian traffic and transit usage in the downtown.
LU-86 Emphasis should be given to enhancing pedestrian linkages
between the Hospital area, the Main Street retail core, the
Performing Arts Center, the southwestem portion of
Downtown, and the pazking azea adjacent to Safeway. An
important element of this emphasis will be to reduce the
pedesirian barrier effect of Auburn Avenue and Auburn Way.
LU-87 The Ciry should build upon past efforts to.improve pedestrian
amenities, thmugh public improvements, sign regulations and
development standards. The maintenance of public and private
improvements should be given priority commensurate with
downtown's rble as the focal point of the coinmunity.
LU-88 The City shall work with transit providers. to increase the
availability and effectiveness of transit in downtown and
between downtown, other commercial and employment areas;
residential azeas, and the region at lazge.
Page 3-32
I A�ea�
�A-F9Draft 201 I
Land Use
LU-89 As regional lransportation programs such as commuter rail are
implemented, the City will strive to ensure that the downtown
is a beneficiary:
Dawnrown Parking
Objective 10.4: To develop a paz&ing pmgram for the downtown which recognizes the
area's historicpedestrian character, while�providing sufficient parking for
customers of all businesses, residents, and commuters.
LU-90 A strong Downtown shall be encouraged through impmved
pazking, circulation, and the gouping of business outlets and
gbvemmental services. Parking standards should be developed
wluch recognize the unique nature of downtown parking
dgmand. The CiTy should. work with the business community
in public/private partnerships to develop a coordinated and
effective approach to providing adequate parking and
circulation.
LU-91 A .strong Downtown shall be encouraged through improved
parking, circulation, and grouping of business outlets and
govemrimental services. The development of public pazking
lots to 'serve the downtown should be guided by a Downtown
Parking Plan.
LU-92 The City views adequate parkin� in the downtown area as a
critical step in implementing the downtown policies and the
rehabilitation policies of ttus Plan. All business in the
downtown azea will be hindered if adequate pazking is not
available. However, parlang needs coupled with rehabilitation
needs in the downtown azea require special policies:
' a. Some flexibility in tlie general.parking reqnirements of the
Gity may be necessary to accommodate reuse of existing
buildings and to accommodate new development. Such
flexiliility sfiould Fie directed at seeking to pool parking
resources through the formation of a Downtown parking
LID when such pazking cannot be prodided by the business
or through shared pazking ag�eements.
� 6. Since rigid pazking .requirements will interfere with
redevelopment of downtown, and the pattern of existing
development restricts the' amount of pazking available;.
public development of pazking in the downtown area is
appropriate.
� Pagc 3-33
tEmeritied ,
�9}BDraft 20]I '
Land Use
c. A comprehensive study of the parking needs of downtown
should be made to detemune the most efficient method of
meeting the unique pazking demands of the azea.
d. Pazking policy for the downtown needs to balance the
impact of pazking on downtown's pedestrian chazacter,
economic development and transit usage.
Downtown Redevelopment
Objective 10.5: To work with all interested groups on revitalizing the Downtown azea.
LU-93 The Ciry of Aubum should suive to maintain active working
relationships with the Auburn Downtown Association, the
Chamber of Commerce and other groups whose goal is the
revitalizazion of downtown. The City will seek to become a
partner with these and other groups, where feasible; in
public/private partnerships that further the goal of downtown
revitalization.
LU-94 1'he City shall continue to support legislation to improve fiscal
leverage in urban rehabilitationprograms.
LU-95 The City shall continue to support the redevelopment efforts of
the private sector in the downtown area.
Industrial
Development Auburn's industrial land and the development that it supports accounts for
a significant percentage of the City's tarc base. It also provides a large
number of jobs to both city and regional residents. Good industrial land is
a limited resource and should be fully utilized to maximize its potential
benefits. Industrial development typically utilizes extensive aznounts of
land and is typically located near major transportation facilities. For these
� reasoris, industrial activities aze often quite visible. For people traveling
on ,SR167, industrial development is the prunary view they haue of
Auburn.
.
� . . . , .
"o'' :° "T�.,°-�'�°-'"^^ The Washin�*.ton State Legislature passed
Substitute Senate Bi115089 on March 22, 2007 that became effective on
Julv 1. 2008 that changed Washington's sales tax collection system from
, Page 3-34
Ante�e�
�9+9Draft 2011 ,
Land Use
an origin-based svstem for local retail sales tax to a destination-based
svstem. Previonslv,-Washington retailers wllected local sales taai 6ased
on the jurisdiction from which a product was shipned or delivered -the
"origin" of the sale. Presentiv. thev must collect based on the destination
of the shipment or deliverv -the "destination" of the sale. Destination-
based sales taz applies onlv to businesses ttiat ship or deliver the goods
they sell to locations within Washinston. Under the destination based
system, if a retailerdelivers or ships merchandise to a buverin
Washington State, the sales tax is collected based on the rate at the
location where t}ie buyer receives or takespossession of the merchandise.
The destinatiori based svstem has shifted the distribution of local sales tax
azound the sfate. Asa result of fhis legislation, the Citv of Aubum has
experienced a net loss in sales tax revenue fotaling approximatelv$2
million annuallv due to the lazge presence of wazehousing and distribution
uses in the Citv. While the City has been a recinient of sales tax miti ag tion
. payments from tlie State of Washineton that has serVed to offset these
losses,the continued availabiliri of these pavments is not certain due to
current and future State budget issues.
The Ciri's land use strategies aze dependent upon the Ciri bein ag ble to
continue a strong nublic invesmient program in infrastructure and services.
The Citv's abilitvto continue tivs public investment is conungent upon
maintaining solvent public revenue streams. narticularly sales ta�c. Sales
tax comprises the laz�est source of monies to fhe City's Creneral Fund,
appmximatelv 30 percent in 20I0. The City anticipates that current and
long-term fiscal challenees facin¢the State of Washineton will likelv
results in the dissolution of the current sales tax revenue miti ag rion
nro¢ram.-The eventual lossof the aforementioned sa]estax revenue will
direcUy and adversely affect the Gi 's.abilitv to adequately fund the
capital infrastructure and services necessary to support the realization of
the Gitv's land use plans. This is esnecially anplicable to industrial areas
supporting warehouse and distriliution centers that are ori�in based in
nature.
� In Novem6er 2004, the Ciri Conncil annroved Resolution No. 3782 that
ouflines an approach and actions the City will take related to land use
planning, zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax
proposal or other similar proposals that change the tax structiue are
adopted. Included in this resolurion is direction to consider amendmenu to
the coinprehensive plan and zoning codes to reevaluate the existing
industrial land use designations and patterns in the City.
To ensure the Ci 's lon�-term abilityxo invest in public infrastructure and
services remains viable, the Citv must pursue implementation of policies
I Page 3-35
�
?818Draft 2011
�oa u� _
that incentive the transition of current and future-land uses in its industrial
zones awav from distribution and warefiouse nses: The Citv believes that
manufacturing and industrial land uses should over time lar�y. replace
warehouse and distribution land uses currentiv existin¢ in.the Citv and that
anv future warehouse and distribution uses should be anciliarv to and'
necessarv for the conduct of manufacturin� and indushial uses.
Manufacturin� and industrial uses aze more appronriate and beneficial
throd�h higher and befter use of the land, enhanced emplovmenf densities,
increased prooertv ta�c revenues and potential on-site sales tax revenue:
�eneration for receipt of materials and other �oods and services. In
addition; the Ciri believes that policies that uromote and incentivize
ereater retail uses in indusuial districts should be implemented to increase
the City's overall base of retail uses thereby increasing the City's overall
collection of sales tax revenue.
GOAL 11. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
To provide for, establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that
respond to local and regional needs and enhance tlie city's image through
optimal siting and location, taking into consideration tax policy impacu of
streamlined sales tax and/or other similar legislation.
Type oflndustrial Uses
There is a wide variety of possible industrial uses that could be sited in
Aubum. As with the mix of residential uses, the mix of industry also
affects the image of the city. "fhe regional nnage of the city is tliat of an
industrial suburb with an emphasis on heavyindustry. This image is quife
appazent as one travels alon� Highway 167 where there is an almost
unending view of high-bay wazehouse buildings.
Different types of industrial areas should be separated since some types of
industrial activities conflict with other industrial activities. (especially
those of a more desirable character). Such separation should be based
primarily on performance standards.
Location of lndustrial Uses
Before the adoption of the 1986 Comprehensive Plan, there had been little
separaiion of various types of industrial uses. At the time, there was no
well understood policy basis regazding the separation of different types of
industrial uses and some areas very suitable for high quality light
industrial uses were committed to heavier uses. High visibility comdors
Page3-36
�
30+BDraft�01 I
Lsnd Use
developed with a heavier industrial chazacter and established a heavy
industry image for the city. The Plan provides cleaz distinction between
different indusuial uses. It also reserves azeas for light indusirial uses.
Objective 11.1. To create a physical image for _tlie city conducive to attracdng light
industry.
Policies:
LU-96 Higfily visible areas which tend to establish the image of ttie
ciry should not be used by heavy industrial uses.
LU-97 The City shall promote high quality development of all light
induslrial and warehouse areas.
LU-98 The Ciry shall aggressively seek to abate all potentially
blighting influences in industrial areas, especially in azeas
visible to regional h�affic flows and in azeas designated for light
industrial uses.
Objective 11.2. To establish performance standards appropriate for developing industrial
areas.
Policies:
LU-99 Compatibility among land uses should be enhanced through
landscaping, building brientation and setbacks, traffic coatrol
" and other measures to reduce potential conflicts.
LU-100 All indusirial development should incorporate aesthetically
pleasing building and site design. The City shall amend its
codes and ,performance standards which govern industrial
development to implement this policy.
a: Procedures shall be established to ensure aesthetically
- pleasing building and site design in azeas designated for
light industrial areas:
b. Appropriate landscaping and site development standards
shall regulate site development in heavy industrial areas.
c. Unsightly views, such as heavy machinery, service
entrances, storage areas, rooftop equipment, loading docks,
and pazking azeas should be screened from view of adjacent
Page 3-37
I Atnen�e�
�9�8 ft 2011
Land Use
retail, commercial, light industrial and residential areas:and
from public streets.
LU-101 Needed rights-of-way, on-site and off-site road improvements,
and utilities should be assured before development occurs.
LU-102 Individual development projects shall_provide the following
minimal improvements in accordance with established City
standards:
a. Full standard streets and sidewalks in compliance with the
Americans with Disabilides Act.
b. Adequate off s�eet pazking for employees and patrons.
c. Laridscapiag.
d. Storm drainage.
e. Water.
f. Sanitary sewers.
g. Controlled and developed access to existin� and proposed
streets.
Objecrive 11.4. To reserve azeas appropriate for industrial development.
Policies:
LU-103 Any significant industrial activity shaU be limited to the
designated Region Serving Area of the city (see Map 3;2). The
City recoguzes that industrial' development's place varying
demands on tha community's qualiry of life and service
capabiliries. In addiuon to demonstrating a, developmeats'
consistency with Plan policies, applicable land use reo'lar;ons,
and environmental policies, significant industrial development
shall be encouraged to provide a balance between service
demands and impacts placed on the city's qualiry of life vs. the
local benefits derived from such development: The extent to
which industrial development is promoted shall also take into
considerauon ta3c policy and taz structure impacts upon the.
Ciry.
LU-104 Residenrial uses in industrial azeas shall be allowed in
indushial areas that have been established to pmmote a
business park environment that complements environmental
features, and/or if development standards aze developed to
promote compatibiliry between residential and other non-
residential land uses.
Page 3-38
�ended
�9+8Draft 201 I
Land Use
LU-105 The grouping ofuses wluch will mutually benefit each other:or
provide needed servic.es will be encouraged.
a Compatible commercial uses may be permitted in
designated indusuialazeas.
b. Planned developments (such as "office pazks") which
provide a mixture of light industrial with supporting
oominercial uses aze encouraged.
c. Uses which support industrial and wazehouse acrivities
should be located neaz those uses.
LU-106 Development of designated industrial sites shall be consistent
with applicable envuonmental standards and policies.
LU-107 Land made available for industrial development, and uses
allowed in industrial wnes, shall take into consideration
impacts of tax policy and ta�c st�ucture upon the City of
Auburn.
Objective 11.4. To reserve and protect azeas which aze highly suitable for light indus�ial
development.
Policies: .
LU-108 Designation of light indusirial azeas shall have priority over
heavier indushial uses.
LU-109 Highly visible areas (land visible from SR167 or SR18) wlricfi
tend to establish the image of the city should not be used by
heavy industrial uses. Rathe;, efforts should be made to
develop zoning dis�icts that complement indusfrial
. development adjacent to environmental features such as the
Auburn Environmental Pazk.
Objective 11.5. To identify azeas appropriate for heavy industrial uses.
Policies:
LU-110 Heavy industrial uses shalt be separated from lighter industrial,
commercial and residential azeas.
LU-111 The most appropriate;areas for heavy industrial uses are in the
central part of the Region Serving Area adjoining the rail:lines.
Page3-39
rknended
�91ADraR 201 I
L,and Use
LU-112 Heavy industrial uses are appropriate in the southem portion of
the Repoa Serving Area which is now developed ia large scale
industrial facilities.
LU-113 Heavy industrial uses shall be strictly prohibited from the
Community Serving Area of Auburn (see Map 3.2). The only
exception to this general policy shall be the continued heary
industrial use of the azea east of"A" Street S.E., as shown by
the Comprehensive Plan Map.
Ob'ective 11.6. To realize the successful transition of existin wazehouse and distribution '
uses to manufacturine and industrial uses.
Policies:
LU-114 Existing wazehouse and distribution uses aze not nreferred long
term land uses in industrial zoning districts in the Ciry: Such
uses should be transitioned to more beneficial manufActurina
and industrial uses through the development and ap,plication.of
incentives.
LU-115 Regulatory and financial incentives will be identified an8
implemented where appropriafe fo provide increased
opportunities.and encouracement for the establishmenf of new
or ezpanded manufacturing and industrial uses and iobs in the.
Citv. �
Ob'ective 11.7. To romote and incentivize increased retail uses in industrial zonin
districts.
Policies:
LU-l16 Changes in comprehensive plan and zonin�policies and
standards should be implemented to create.seeulatorv controls
and incentives for the increased use of land and buildin s� te_for
sales tax producing commercial retail uses.
Redevelopment
and Infill A major goal of the Growth Management Act is to reduce urban sprawl.
One way to min;miie sprawl is to fully develop azeas already receiving
Page 3-40
I ���
2&F9Draft 2011
I,and Use
wban services prior to extending these services to additional areas: A
fiirther 6enefit of redevelopment is that it may lead to the removal_ of
buildings and uses that detract from an area. Redevelopment can serve as
a major catalyst in the stabilization and revitalization of azeas throughout
the ciry.
GOAL 12. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT
To encourage redevelopment of underurilized azeas to reduce sprawl and
take fiill advantage of the City's investment in existing infrastruct�ue.
Objective: 12.1 To facilitate infill development.
Policies:
� LU-1�417 Encourage well designed infill and redevelopment projects to
fully utilize previous investment in existing infrastructure in
the single family residential; moderate density residenrial, and
high density residential designated azeas of the City.
� LU-1�318 Reduce the consumption of undeveloped land by facilitating
ttie redevelopment of underudlized land and infill of vacant
pazcels whenever possible in the single family residenrial,
moderate density residential, and high density residential
designated azeas of the Ciry.
� LU-1�6]_9 Explore innovative mechanisms to enwurage the more
efficient use of land including density bonuses and sale of an�
rights.
� LU-1�20Identify areas for commercial infill development and focus
street and utility systems improvements to facilitaxe theu
development.
Page 3-41
�en�ed
�Ab9Draft 20]T '
i
(See nages 4-3 and 4-7 and revised FiQUre 4.S for chanQes related to
ponulation and census.l
CI-�APTER 4
HOUSING � �
Introduction
T'he Growth Management Act requires a housing element ad� 'ng the
availabiliry of affordable housing for all segments of�'f3Ze po�p�'�ytion.
Housing affordability can be an issue for all income�`�afegories. The
primary supplier of housing for more affluent income grou,�s is"i�e market
place, witfi government playing only a minor rq�e.�`"`'��Io�"ever, the mazket
place only marginally meets the housing needs of io esr income groups,
and therefore the government plays a mon�si' 'fic�qt tole in pmviding
affordable housing to these income groups. �
�' �" ��
VJhile the importance of ttris sectt �not be underestimated, it is
crucial to note other important .facf rs�The affordability of housing
regards a wide range of issru��and rel� topics; for instance, land use,
economic development �d��ucnan services. Each of these topics
influences the develo ent and��faracter of Aubum's housing stock. To
understand this plan's p oach to affordable housing requires looking at
the plan as a wh le,and;°'�t.�,solely this section.
This elemertf'as re�ar��the understanding that regional and national
trends � a.�opsl�ierable impact on housing. Regional and fedecal
policfes��1�$, avazIability, labor and material cost, financial markets
incttiiling::in�st rates, consumer demands; all exercise influence on
hou�ig de5'elopment and aze beyond the immediate influence of the Ciry
of Au6wne�
.,.�,
Even with these limitations, Auburn's Comprehensive Plan contains
reasonable and feasible strategies. and policies. By implementing this
Comprehensive Plan, Auburn can sustain and enhance those amibutes that
currently make it a desirable place to live.
Background
and lssues Housing Market Analysis
In the yeaz 2000, the median sales price of a single family residence in
Auburn was ;$161,950 and the median value of a home was $153,400,
• P�e 4_�
Amended 2009
IHousing
according to the King County Assessor. Compared to the rest of King
County, the cost of housing in Auburn is a bargain. In yeaz 2000 tlie
median sales price of a single family residence in King County was
$289,800 and the median value was $236,000. Four years later the
median sales price of a home in Auburn increased to $262,000 and the
median value of homes is $176,000. The cost of housing in.Anbuin is still
considerably less than the rest of King County, but it is quickly catching
up. The following table.represents a snapshot of the housing market on
two sepazate dates. Several of the homes for sale that aze less than
$100,000 are mobile homes in designated manufactured home parks.
Figure 41 �
Homes for Sale in Aubura '
� �
snanooa� ,�Gr2nooz
Total Number of SF Houses 429,., "`' �'� 474
Median Price: 262 000`}: �$239,950 .
Number of Units �� ���
Over$325,000 ''`'":;. '`� "�
>r' k: •gg �' 93
$25Q000 to$325,000 '''?'^'� �',�qb ��g
$175,000 to$250,000,�'� '�'•"�''j 15 186
$]00,000to$175000� "�:; 32 7Z
Less than$IOO;OOO ,a .`' 38 5
�; �
�ryh,
�y$�;Z;�, C4.
�`;y�`�``?:•. �'^'
Housine Afforda�ili�`�`ti:��
� °�. Y4�
Affordabt'�'ty�coince�g'is all households, regardless of income. It pertains to
a �ou�d�s_attempt to reach a balance between its financial means and
its,�esire' or'``8ecent housing and amenities. The accepted definition of
afford„�bili�y is based on the percentage of household income spent on
dwelling��costs. Dwelling costs for an owner occupied unit include
principal and interest payments, ta�ces, insurance and public utilities. A
housing unit is considered af'fordable if monthly dwelling costs are less
than 30% of the household's gross income. If a larger share of household
income is spent on dwelling costs, then the household is probably
sacrificing money that would normally be spent for other basic needs such
as food, health care, child caze, education, etc:
The term "affordability gap" refers to the difference between the-average
price of housing — either rented or owned — and the recommended,
affordable price of housing. A positive gap means the price o£housing is
less than the recommended amount that a household could afford to pay.
Page 42
Amencle�
2999Draft 201I
I Housiug
Households with positive affordability gaps have several choices of
affoidable housing. A negarive gap indicates the price of housing exceeds
the recommended amount for housing. Households with a negative
affordability gap have fewer housing choices.
According to the�--299��et�sas2007-2009 3-vear American
Community.Surdev YACSI, the median household income in King County
was $33;33�68.387 per yeaz or $5�4,439 per month. For half of the
households.in King County, housing costs of less than $�1;33A1_� per
month woiild be affordable {30% of $4,4385� per month}. The
median houseliold income for Aubum is $53,853 or $4,488 per month.
For half the households in Aubum. housing costs of less than�$i,346 per
month would be affordable. The �2007-2009 AGS in�'T d�, the
median rent paid by Auburn residents wa§ $b39-775 De�nth an`2i the
median mortgage payment was $�8Fr�1j618 per month. Sishsequently,
Auburn has a number of affordable tiousing �hpioes�relative to King
County in general. Figure 4.2 represents the�re,�tiue affordability of
housing cosu relative to the King Coun4y M��i� Houseliold Income.
o �$�
Figure 4.2 �
Housing Afforda ' " ;by.i�icom"e Level
4
[ocome Group Yrj.,�Mont��'� Aftordable %Aubnrn .
� �p9ehold Income Housing Costs Homeholds ,
VcryLOwlncome , �,.,'' iess SI;285 0
0-29%of KCMI Fi`+ less tNen er hour a0 ro 5385 16 k
Low Inwme. � SI�86 W IS �
30-49%ofKCMI �h1.�S8-El3 hom 5386 ro 5664 24%
Moderate Inwme � 16 m 53,544
50-79%of KCM[ • '�% . 13-$20 er hoiv 5665 to E I,060 I6%
� Low-Medianl�pme "� : "`$3;i45� to $4,430 �.
80A9%of � .K 520-$25 rhour $�.061 to $1,330 14%
High-Me an Incofiie 54,431 W 55,270 �
IOI-II�URLC�.M1"�.``'.r:� S25-S30 hpw 51,331 to $1,580 9% , '
URyfcJqcamE�'+,,, � more than$5;270 '�
� �130%oriMreof�CCMI morethun$35 erhour $�581or.morc 21%
S&urc`e�.�U.'$.'Census Bureau
Cost Burden
Figure 4.3 shows the percentage of total households in Aubum and King
County relative to the amount of their household income spent on housing
costs. In both King County and Auburn approxitnately one out of three
households pay 35% or more of their household income for housing costs.
Approximately 75%of Auburn households who earn less than $20,000 per
year pay more than 30% for their housing costs. For income groups above
$20,000 peryear, an even greater percentage of King County households
have unaffordable housing. A lazger ,percentage of households earning
Page 4-3
I A�ea�ed
�894Draft 201 I
� I Housing
between $35,000 to $50,000 per year can find affordable housing in
Auburn than the rest of King Coiinty.
Figure 43
Households Paying More Than 30% for
Housing Gosts By Income Group
��e G��P Y Aubum�Kiri Co. m Pieroe Co �
$100,000 ar more: �—
$75,OOOto 599,999: �----- .
$50,OOOto$74,999: �-=---��r---�--,-� .
�$35,OOOSO549,999: � = --
IHousing
family to townhouse to mulrifamily developments. Most family
developments aze small,having 30 units or less. The populations served
by the KCHA include families, the elderly, chronically mentally ill,
developmentally disabled, victims of domestic violence, youth, and
persons with AIDS. Eligible families earn no more than 50%of the King
County median income. Rents are not more than 30%of the tenant's net
income. Approximately 678 units,which is 20% of KCHA total units, are
located in Auburn.
Figure 4A
KCHA Rental Units Located in Auburn
�"°:
Development Name a��ts o�g�.
Green River Homes I 60 F7S/D�
Green River Homes II 60 E!S/D . '
WaylandArms 67 w�S/D
Burndale SOi,�i'"^'��:,f F
Firwood Cucle 50:. ?s F
Plaza Seventeen 70 £:�r,.•%' S/D
Gustaves_Manor 35,�` 'v' S/D
Auburn Square 16Q F
Tall Cedars Mobile � 3�6 F
Home Park r��
Totals ,�•�� � 678
�;�
D:Disabled F:�'amily,;�S:Senior
`�a.r;•
� �`�..
King County Ho u�ig. uthority administers the Section 8 Housing
Assistance E a�in.uvhc'h�'subsidizes tlie rental payments of low income
households A�"ror�imately 8.7%of Kirig County's vouchers and
certificat'es�`,a 13�'uet�to Auburn landlords and tenants. According to
infof°`matipn p;AVided by KCHA, Auburn currently has 1,246 Section 8
as�ho�(ising uniu. The King County Consolidated Plan states that in
1999 ub�un had 999 housing units funded through Section 8. Appazently
the num�er of Section 8 units has increased 25%over the past five years.
The need forpublic housing exceeds the,supply of available public
housing and/or Section 8 housing vouchers. As of April 1999,
approximately 2,400 applicants were on the waiting list for public
housing. Among these applicanu, 62%qualify for federal preference for
admission. Applicants in the federal preference category are given the
highest priority on the waiting list 6ased on need. Once preference is
assigned,they are given housing according to the date and tune of their
qualification. The average waiting time for assisted housing is about two
years.
Page 4-5
I tE�exde�
�999Draft 2011
I Hotising
�
�
� ��
.�r� �
� � . - ��...��'uY
:�
gC`�� y„b.lS
., ,�y.
.�� ' s�%"�'
,�� ; �'ur
Y}4���
� ., �.;n;.�� .
� +,'�,��c%.
��
N� •�
�. h.t� ,
,r�`' t,•. C�.
4J,
fr� �� C�
. . �{C S''��?::\.i;i
,x�:.4
�'�1�\� }':i
. +�,kh%y V}• ,,'
��
Page 4-6
�rnaex�le�
�9A4Draft 201 I
IHousing
Household Proiections
The City of Aubum's "�2&2031 Popularion Projection" forecast that
Anburn will experience gr•eaEer-�Sa-sveFSgecontinued growth over the
next 20 years. Housing developments in the Pierce County portion of
Aubum combined witfi anneacations,of Lea Hill and West Hill,will drive
Aubum's growth over the next twenty years. Figure 4.5 represents the
projected housing growth indicateii in the City's "Year 2031�A Population
Estimate" with an update to veaz 2010 with the 2010 Census data.
� -
�: . �
Figare 4.5 � �•
I Housing Unit Growth Projections
1970 to 203139 �'
� �`
ao,000
a�.asa
35,000
?.834
30,000
'+7.834
25,000
20,000
16,767
15,000
3.357
10,000
0
S,ppO
0
1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2031
Distn'buHon of Housine Amons Income Gmuas
King Connty's growth management policies recommend Auburn plan for
37%of its projected new housing units be affordable to low and moderate
income households as follows: 20% for low income and 17°/a for moderate
income households. The King County Planning Policies state that in areas
identified as city expansion areas, King County and the respective cities
should plan cooperatively for affordable housing development and
preservatioa.. Figdre 4.6 represents the.projected distribution of new
Page 47
� f��ea��
�969Draft 2011
I Hoiising
housing units relative to respective income groups to the year 2020. The
dislribution between single family and multi-family dwelling tuqts is
consistent with the mix of types of housing units reported in the Yeaz 2000
Census.
Figure 4.6
Aubum's Year 2020 Housing Target
Total SF MF SF MF Total Total HU %Total '
2000 2010 2010 2020 2020 New HU Yr2020 Yr2020'
ss than 50% 534Z 0 777 0 7I7 . . 1494 6841 . 20%
0%-80% 4841 100 407 100 368 . 975 5816..�: . 17% ,
80%-120% 3944 1224 816 . 1130 754 3924 7868".�' ��k23%
120%+ 3552 4500 769 4000 863 10132 , 13684 ' 4�%
Total 17,684 5,824 2,769 5,230 2,702 16,525 �34,ZOQ ' 100%.
�
fi`)"«i. .;:;'}
t,:
� ka�'.�
',>.
.r'y'qy, ��:
Housing Strategy Auburn's Overal!Housing Development Sti`ute� �:.�:�
�; :.
� ,tiF:
Over the past twenty years, Auburq�tespondedipfisitively to the housing
needs of low and moderate income;graitps Over the next twenty years,
Auburn will attempt to nomic ly�vntegrate iu community by
� �:,. �
diversifying its housing stock to include all income groups. Auburn
currently has a relativelyrsmall•"portion of households consisting of middle
and higher income groiips� By�iving to bring its number of low and
moderate income householils in line with the rest of King County, wtrile
increasing �the g#ov,�h r�, of households with more affluent incomes,
Auburn should achievewia more even distribution and diversity of social-
economic gm�s. ��
'.�i:.. :.>:•:�•.,. �>
„ ,�,;...„..:�,..
Resideaktial'#;and communiry development in Aubum will reflect a
x� r
co 8ction�� of:: culturally diverse and economically integrated
nei�hborhobds. Neighborhoods consisting predominandy of single faaiily
reside�'�e�joined together by a pedestrian oriented {ransportation system,
along with complementary public spaces, educational facilities,
recrearional and social services sufficient to promote and sustain an
amenable quality of life for a family-oriented community. Development
acrivities will cultivate a sustainable community whereby:
• Home buyers and renters of all income groups have sutl'icient
opportunities to procwe affordable housing.
Page 4-8
�e�
�999Draft 2011
I Housing
• Existing neighborhoods along with properties of special and/or
historic value are preserved for the enjoyment and enhancement of
fixture generations.
• A balanced mix of affordable housing types exist that are
appropriate•for a family-oriented community in order to meet the
needs of all economic segmenu of the population.
• Public and private agencies implement policies and offer programs
or proje.cts that help alleviate physical and economic distress;
conserve energy resources; iinprove the quality and uantity of
community services; and eliminate conditions that aze��mental
to health, safety and public welfare. ;;a
��`a' tt
• Residential developments. are monitored far the�p'�rpose of
reducing the isolation of income groups�gr�ps with special
needs; the determination of existing anil f�e housing needs;
better urilization of land and othe�'�urcess,.�'.�that enhance the
availability.of affordable housing op�sort�uties
HOUSING '� �
POLICIES GOALS AND POLICIES RE�LA����HOUSING
:�
GOAL 4 COMMiJNITY CHARAGT�Ii
To maintain �and nl�iana� "e Anliura's character as a family-oriented
community while�man�g potential-economic opportunities in a manner
that provides nec�sary .mployment and fiscal support for needed services
and while�cog�`the need to provide human services and
opportuni:es f ho�ing to a wide array of household types and sizes.
�'^C.� h�,
Objective 4.2 Prouid'e4 �s and facilities that serve low income families and prevent
in'tii�iduals�om becoming homeless.
'�'"•.. ' �,I�
HO-1 �'�°�Encourage and support htunan and health service organizations
t.�iat ofFer programs and facilities for people with special needs,
particulazly programs that address homelessness and help
people to remain within the community.
HO-2 Special attention stiall be given to maintaining and improving
the quality of public services in declining azeas of the City.
HO-3 The City shall seek and provide assistance to nonprofit agencies
operating emergency sfielters and transitional housing for
homeless people and other groups with special needs.
Page 4-9
Ainended
�994Draft 2011
I Housing
Objective 4:3 To preserve and pmmote those community faciliries and programs that aze
important to the safety, health and social needs of families and children.
HO-4 The City shall reco�ni�e the important role of public
improvements, facilities and programs in providing a healthy
family envimnment within the community.
HO-5 The City of Aubum shall review proposals to site facilitias
providing new or expanded human services within the Ciry to
determine their potential impacts and whether the meet the
needs of the Auburn community. Important cav in the
City's consideration will include the following:
a. While Auburn will willingly accept its re�al sfiare of
facilities which provide residential services, or influence
' residential location decisions, Au"b"um wi"Il expect oth_er
communities to accept their s�e��i ell�
b. The funding of human servic� c E�`, ters'�sited in Aubum that
serve an area larger than Aubum wouTrl rely on an equitable
regional sowce of fuudii}g. �s` <'�`
#� .�,ih�".,
c. The siting of all facil"rfi'es stiall be based on sound land use.
planning pr' ciples and�� should establish working
relationshi�is affected neigliborhoods.
Objective 4.4 Explore all available �detBE; state and local programs and private options
for financing affordabte ousing, removing or reducing risk factors; and
preserving safe n��Fiborh�.
4�`�'°�ax
/..��';� '
HO-6 .Gs�"fhe'Ciry'"�u,v,ill involve both the public and private sectors in the
. `� �:ba.,w,�� �
�'p. `viSYtin>of affordable housing.
�r.�„`;�,
,�r� .
��
Ht�.7 �e City of Aubum will support national, state and especially
��":;. ,iegional efforts to address the human service needs of the
y'�`�region and the City.
H0.8 . In most cases, the Ciry will favor regional responses to human
service needs. However, such regional efforts must be
consistent with the concepts of fiscal equity. In other words,
these efforts should mutually affect persons or communities of
similaz income, on both the revenue (tax) and expenditure
(service) sides of the equation.
HO-9 The Ciry shall evaluate housing codes on an ongoing basis to
determine their effecriveness and appropriate enforcement.
Page 4-10
feiiien�ed
�894Draft 2011 '
I — . —
I Hoasing
GOAL 7 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
To emphasize housing development at single,family densities in order to
reestablish a mix of housing types appropriate for a family-oriented
comcnunity while recognizing the need and desire for both nual density
and moderate densiry housing appropriated located to meet the housing
needs of all members of the community.
06jective 7.7 Conserve the existing housing stock because iYis the most affordable form
of housing.
HO-10 Any assessment of the need'for affordable housing�`in Aubum
shall be based on.the community providing its fa1�e of
regional need for lo�vand moderate income ho�e�tolds.
� x:
HO-11 The City will work with all jurisdictiQr�,c within the�region to
develop a regional approval to ai�rd��e.�iousing. Each
jurisdiction should be wged to,prbvi�de for its:fair share of the
region's affordable housing rieed.�.� w-"'�
HO-12 The City will involve both p►�`Iic and private sectors in the
provision of affordable h0 g�:•4;
a
HO-13 T&e City shal�w apprbp tely designed manufactured
housing withi3n sing e4y�family.neighborhoods, consistent with
state law. �'°� , �
HO-14 The C� a�hall�low manufactured housing pazks and multiple
f `ly� :opinent in appropriatelyzonedbut limited areas.
� �,
HO-15 '��'h�• •�;��ill assist low-income persons, who are displaced as a
�,.-'z:. result of redevelopment, find affordable housing in accordance
�+it�i�tate and federal laws and regularions.
HO-1 ' . omiation, and resources that educate and guide low-income
persons toward affordable housing opportunities will be
prepated and made available.
HO-17 Through its building pemiif process, the Ciry will inventory and
track affordable housing opportunities within Aubum.
Information about afforilable housing units will be distributed to
nonpmfit agencies serving the homeless and low-income
persons.
Page 4-11
flxtended
�899Draft 2011''
I Housing
Objective 7.8 To respond to the housing needs of individuals and families that cannot
afford or do not choose to live in traditional detached single-fanuly
housing.
H0-18 Encourage. residential development in Downtown, particulazly
housing that is integrated with commercial development.
HO-19 Allow accessory dwelling units as an affordable housing
strategy.
GOAL 8 NEIGHBORHOOD QUALITY
�
To maintain and protect all viable and stable residential neighboYh��o�'od,�s.
Objective 8.3 Conserve the livability of viable residential areas through ttie ,�servation
of exisring housing stock and amenities.
����
HO-20 The City shall seek available""�assist nce for housing
rehabilitation. Assistance will��iinc ude�i� development of
residential infrastructure and the rehaln`Iitation of individual
properties. " � a�
���
HO-21 The City will wozk with�p�ark owners, managers and pazk
tenants to devel�p`"��olicies and land-nse regiilations to pTeserve
manufactured�home parks and the afFordable housing they offer.
� � �"`.
HO-22 The City wil�ncourage and assist in the renovation of surplus
� public�a�i..c,om�ercial buildings into affordable housing.
'�n. .y��.
: ,
H0-23 �'he'�ity'•'�`uvill seek, encourage and assist noriprofit organizations
�in�aCqturi�g depreciated apartment units for the purpose of
:w�ma�ntaining and ensuring their long-term affordability.
� ,
' :.� "�t.��`C.
�A�..
H0=�24 �The City will work with neighborhood groups to develop '
��^���ne�ghborhood strategir plans for specific azeas within the City.
These azeas will be detemuned based upon need, City Council
directiom and the availability of staff resources. These plans
will address issues and concerns which include; but are not
limited to, projected growth/decline, neighborhood identity,
safety, education,youth and recreational activities:.
Page 412
I �+en�ed
�994Dratt 2017
IHousing
Goa112 URBAN REDEVELOPMENT
To encourage redevelopment of undenitilized areas to reduce sprawl and
take full advantage of the City's investment in existing infrastructure.
Objective 12.1 Provide flexibility in development regulations so that a variety of housing
types and site planning techniques can achieve the maximum housing
potential of a particular site.
HO-25 The Ci4y shall identify rehabilitation azeas, with priority given
to blighted azeas with a relatively large populati��of low-
income persons, for possible designation with }ierfomiance
wning. Criteria for peiformance zoning��-�all in�lude
generation of affordable housing, protection of na features
and open spaces, impact on existing utilil�es, haffic generation,
neighborhood . compatibility, and �the;s:^��$licies of this
Comprehensive Plan. ��,,
#� ,� �
HO-26 The Ciry shall develop incentives �o�,.;:develop underutilized
parcels into new uses thai�l�pw 13�em�to function as pedestrian=
oriented, mixed-use nei�tb oods. Existing uses which are
complementary, ec;onomi�d physically viable shall
integrate into th,� and fiinction of the neighborhood.
�
HO-27 The City�has,�,,;,�d innovative zoning provisions to
encourage �'development of underutilized parcels in zones
which,3�",,throu �ubum Comprehensive Plan goals and policies,
h�v�e ��dentified as areas where infill residential
ev pm�ent should be encouraged. Certain development
��'�e�.?�ts for infill development may be relaxed, while
� . .
requu�umg adherence to specific desi� requirements to ensure
a,
mpatibility with the character of neazby existing residential
es.
Objective 12.2 To develop economically integrated, walkable neighborhoods which
generate a secure atmosphere for both residents and visitors.
HO-28 1'he City recognizes that the development of safe
neighborhoods requires the cooperation of property owners
and/or their property managers. T'he City shall organize,
educate and assist property managers in the creadon and
preservation of safe neighborhoods.
Page 413
I Amen�ed
�994Draft 2011
I Housing
HO-29 The City shall seek and provide assistance for the reduction of
lead-based paint hazazds.
HO-30 The City will continue its program to repair .and/or replace
deteriorated sidewalks and remove bazriers to pedestrian traffic.
H.U.D. block grant funds may be used to remove pedestrian
barriers and pay the tax assessments levied upon ]ow income
households for sidewalk repairs.
HO-31 The City will continue to insure that funding becomes available
to support youth and social services in Aubum.
� ��.
GOAL 22 URBAN DESIGN AND VISUAL QUALITY �
� ��a
To ensure a high quality visual environment through appropnate design
. standards and procedures which encourage high�qn�it��'architectural and
landscape design in all development and thro�gh the placement of arfwork
in public places. The City recognizes the I'�kages b�riveen transportation,
land use and site design and encourage development which eases access
m ��
by pedestrians, bicyclists and traasit;5°°s"exs. � <�
na x�.:,
��r.;e �;.
HO-32 Ensure that all affoidable �iQUSi g development is consistent
with current housitig.quality standards.
,�'c� w,v,.
HO-33 The City `"11 eacouia�e varied and human-scaled building
design tha�`rovides a visual interest to pedestrians,
comp�bi�ity �`"�,'th historic buildings or other neighborhood
st�pctures, ��enhancesthe streetscape.
>�'`�`3:
,,. �::
HO-34 Co�Serve..developable land and natural resources through a
'+c:':•r. -.. .
"'r vanety of housing types, conservation and site planning
'�?.,, �.:,
�chniques that achieve the maxunum housing potential and
�passive energy use of a particulaz site.
r'
Page 414
�nea�ed
�994Draft 201]
i
(See napes 8-2.throueh 8-3 and revised FiYUre 8.1 torrhanpes related to
ponulation and'census and naees &5 throrreh 8-8 for chanPes related to
economic develooment strate2v areas.)
CHAPTER 8
ECOI�TOMIC DEVELOPIVIENT
Introduction � �,, { '
s °'
Aubiirn's economic base drives ai►d shapes the comii►uni�d region.
.Auburn residenu and the surrounding region be,�t�t fr�Qfn the jobs and
services :Auburn's economic base offers. Throug' h �he�ayment of sales,
' property and other taxes,the City of Auburn fund��l provide services
and public facilities which Aubum residenu��nd and/or require.
It is cleazly in the City's best interesG'�'o�iait►Yain and expand our economic
base m unison with implementing �1x�OY�he goals of this Comprehensive
Plan. This section of the p,��t► will �py'�o define the City's goals and
policies in this vital area ��"'�;.h
� ���
�
Issues & �^.�.. �
��;��,,:
BaCkgCOUnd Hisforic Tr zls
Histori , a�%anet;+ of factors have shaped Aubum's economy. At the
turn Ct�]�a�'cen , the City bffe=ed services to support agriculture
an�d�'•t'�e��oads. Downtown offeied:a full range of services and retail
oppqituni��. In later years, automotive sales became a significant factor.
r
As urb�zatios of the region expanded to include Auburn, the vitaliry of
Downtown Auburn was impacted by new shopping malls located outside
the community and by changing retail trends. At the same time, Auburn's
impoitance as the home of large industrial and warehousing operations
increased., Thi§ same period saw the growth of retail along commercial
"strips" such as Aubum Way and 15tii Street NW. Large retailers such as
Fred Meyer and many major supermazket chains located in the
community:
The development of the SuperMall in the 1990's led to Auburn becoming
a major playei`ia the regional retail market. Auburn shoppers ao longer
Page 8-1
���en�ed
�698Dre8 2011
IEconomic Development
needed to leave the City to visit retail malls for many of their purchases.
During that same decade, Emerald Downs and the Muckleshoot Casino
also contributed to commercial recreation facilities in Auburn and
associated employment growth.
Today, Auburn provides over 38,000 jobs for residents throughout the
region. Aubum has a stron� industrial sector that includes Boeing, the
General Service Administration (GSA) and numerous warehouse and
distribution facilities. Auburn Regional Medical Center and tfie growing
medical office community also provide a significant number of jobs. The
retail and service sectors aze expanding as small businesses aze created. .
Educational uses such as the Aubum School District and C� Rivet
Community College also add to the area's employment base. �
While development has continued throughout the City, Do�dwn Aubum
remains the heart and soul of the community. Wi;b�u lustorical�character
and pedeshian oriented development pattem,-DQwn�b�i Aubum reflects
many of the qualities being sought by other.;coimmumhes: Given its urban
center designation, Auburn Station, and t�ie i�centi�s the City has in
place, Downtown.4uburn remains poised for co�}tiutied revitalization.
r:�`^��:, ,��' w��
<.;.;;;:%�k�.
_: �•y,•.
EMPLOYMENT f '��;;��>'
GROWTH �:..
,�.
:�°' f�`�'�:.
EMPLOYMENT ��>�. ,;;%'
�:t�.,s
.<w. �..
� "° -�^�Aubuiii`pzny,i�des over 38,000 jobs for residents throughout the
region. Au.buxn 'ki�s%2 di�erse industrial sector tha4 includes Boeing, the
General��,ervic'u,es Administration (GSA) and numerous warehouse and
distributi�n4�a''�iliiies. Auburn Regional Medical Center ancl the growing
medical�'o,ffioe.community also provide a significant number of jobs. The
retail and �ervice sectors continue to expand as companies locate in
Aubuis�,a��as small businesses are created. Educational usessuch as the
Auburn School District add to the employment base.
Between 1995 to 2000, the number of jobs located in Auburn increased
34% compazed to an overall increase of 22% throughout the rest of King
County. Manufacturing jobs remain the lazgest category in Aubum,
despite the loss of neazly 2,000 manufacturing jobs since 1990.. T&e
remaining job categories all experienced job growth. Retail jo6s increased
substantially along with jobs in warehousing, transportation, and
, communication industries. Figure 8.1 compares the type of jobs located in
� Aubum since 1995A.
Page 8-2
A{wended
�999Draft 2011
I Economic Development
Figure 81
� Jobs Located in Aubum 1995-2010
:�5,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
2S,Q00
20,000 a 1995Jobs
15,000 u2000Jobs
10,000 ■2010Johs
5,000
0
�o�� �4G��J 4�s0 �� �� �o �oo
ge ��c° �P �o�
C�O Go°
� Source: Puget SoundRegiona •� unc�l:wv�empl�vment data.
It is eacpected that Aubtirn'.s em qyment base will continue to grow into
Ithe future. To the y`ea�z�1/31�, the King County Countywide Planning
Policies haue assi ed A��um's job base to increase by�919350 jobs.
It should be note�"yChis`� umlier is not a maximum, but the City's most
recent ass�s�of future pmjected growth in the County.
i"t, �.',��;n... 4�'�
��..r •.. .�r,�.
Retail•�ales'
A,�b�iim's us :ess community is keeping pace with both Auburn's
populahon owth and its increase in more affluent households. Between
1995�.�003, retail sales in Auburn increased 59% or roughly 8% per
yeaz. As showri in Figure 8.2, Aulidm is the sixth lazgest retail center in
Pierce and King.Counties outside of Tacoma, Seattle and Bellewe.
Page 8-3
��
�994Draft 2011
I Ecouomic Development
Figure 8:2
City Retail Sales (Outside of Seattle/Tacoma/Bellevue)
Yr 1995 Rank'95 Yr 2003 Rank'03
Kent 1,507,693,474 2 2,005,340,826 1
Tukwila 1,572,309,882 1 1,798,012,039 2
Renton 1,117,803,594 4 1,763,639,632 3 �
Redmond 1,345,470,014 3 1,640,192,690 4
Puyallup 788,047,838 8 I,474,074,155 5
Aubum 910,528,894 6 1,450,240,653 6
Kirkland 1,032,278,016 5 1,356,322,041 '7
Woodinville 276,251,793 12 1,356,322,041 ��
Federal Way 885,908,414 _ T 1;179,841,030
Issaquah 473,022,152 10 1,008,655,95�'�� 10�.
Source: Staie of Washington Department of Revrnue
�k
� Beginning in 1997, retail sales in Auburn beganyin�teasing at a rate fastei
than the rest of King County., In the Year 2000,�""rotail sales in King
County fell whereas sales in Auburn remain�d�s eady., �the end of 2002,
retail sales cbntinue to remain steady and�lugtier�ha"an the rest of King
County. Figure 83 illustrates Yhis�co�mp�so�between Aubiun, King
County and Washington State.
� r2;w:`�'c.. .
y:
''"�Figure'8:3�'
Comp r.ison of Retail Sales
60% ----------------•-----------------------------------
50% -----•- • •- •-----• • •-•-- ••---. _ ....- • - ---
40°h "------------'--'---"".- ' "''.�._____._ —.'-_
i
i
.
i
30% ....... -• • -••---•---- •v�-------------• -------- •-
.
�
:�
20% ---'--"_"'-..c -"----'-- -------------------------
,
/
i
10% """ ""'_"""""""•"..........""" "'
0%
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002
tAuburn �King Coun —:—Washin on State
Source: Washington State Dept of Revenue
Page 8-4
�,
�999Draft 11
IEconomic Development
STREAMLINED SALES TAX
The State of Washington recently adopted streamlined sales tax (SST)
legislation. Prior to SST, sales tax collection in Washington State was
based on the site of origin, rather than on the site of delivery. Under the
SST tax �stcucture, sales tax is collected at the site of delivery rather thap
from those areas from which they were shipped. This change in tax
structure will put Auburn at a disadvantage and negatively impact its tax
revenue.
Specifically, Aubum and similar cities have historically �vested in
infrastructure to support businesses engaged in warehouse and�istzibution
activities that ship goods to other destinations. Anot�r concel�q for
Auburn and similaz cities that have invested in infrastruc clude how
the debt that has already been extended.for such infrashv�Il be paid
and how the loss of a significant source of r e4nue��9i11 at�fect bond
ratings. ��
�%�� �
3 �
:f
'� L��.
Based on the potential passage of Sy$'�`;�he,�iub� City Council appmved
Resolution No. 3782 in November � �"Itesolution No. 3782 outlines an
approach and actions the C� will e�related to land use planning,
zoning and other matters in'�tlte event a streamlined sales tax proposal or
other similaz.proposals�t#�t cha�the tax structure aze adopted.
.�
Because of the State o�f'3Tt�a.'�shin on's implementation of sales tax
mitigation naym�ciffies such as Anburn. the impact resulting from
streamlined es�axsh�a tieen somewhat lessened. However the
continued:�va��bil'itY of these payments is not certain due in part to the
State's ciir.re a�i atitici ated fiscal challen es. In addition the amount of
pav.�i n�,da not eaual tfie total loss in ravenue to the City. The City's
econ��pment straterzies aze dependent upon the City being able
to continuea strona nublic investment pmeram in infrastructure and
serviceS"°�he City's abiliri to continue this public investment is contin e�nt
uuon maintaininesobent nublic revenue streams, particnlazlv sales tax.
— - -
Sales tax comprises the largest source of monies to the Citv's General
Fund:approximatelv 30 nercent in 2010. The Ciri anticipates that current
and lon�-term fiscal challenees facina the State of Washington will likely
results in the dissolution of the current sales tax revenue miti a� tion
program. The eventual loss of the.aforementioned sales ta3c revenue will
directiv and adverselv affect the Citv's ability to adequately fund the
capital infrastructure and services necessary to support the realization of
the Citv's economic develoament strate�ies. This is especially apolicable
Page 8-5
Aee�en�e�
�S99Draft 2011
I Ernnomic Development
to industrial areas suonortina warehouse and distribution centers that are
origin based in nature. �
2005 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES
In 2005 the Ciry of Aubuin brought together a focus grodp of diverse
business and community interests that identified several economic
development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is reflected in
an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strategies
and actions needed to affect necessary ctiange for specific strategy areas
' � within the city. _Implementation of these strategies is. intended;to enable
the Ciry to achieve the City's economic developmen� temial.
Implementation of acrions and strategies in the Econom`�c Dev�Ael'�pment
Strategies is appropriate and reflected in various elemen�s��t,h� e Aubinn
Comprehensive Plan. � �;.
r£``-•.
Since .the develonment of the Economic �Dev`�lopment Strate '�es
documen additional economic develo ment�9stra �azeas have been
identified to include the SE 312�' Street/12 �`F' Avenne SE conidorwitfiin
the:recently annexed portion of Lea I�ill and�M Street SE between Adburri
Wa�North and Auburn Wav South�; ,�,
��`��,a
J. �
Goals and ''� ��"`"�'�
' Policies ECONONIIC DEVE��MEN;� GOALS AND POLICIES
GOAL 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOp�NT
To ensure the lo��ei��economic tiealth of the City and the region
I through a>�'diversi�ied economic base that supports a wide range of
employment,apportu iities for Auburn's residents arid those of the region
and :thrp,�gl;;,the promotion of quality industrial and commercial
deu��pm�nt which matches the aspirations of the community.
Objective 9.1. Promofe,��diversified economic base capable of withstanding changes in
iaterest rates, inflation,tax structure and mazket conditions.
_
ED-1 Ciry promorion of new industry shall be directed at amacting
business that diversifies the City's tax base, offers secure, quality
employment opportunities, is sensitive to community values and
promotes the development of attractive facilities.
ED-2 Emerald Downs, the Muckleshoot Casino, and the SuperMall of
the Great Northwest offer opportunities for economic
diversification that should be optunized by,the Ciry.
Page 8-6
f\men�e$
�994Draft ZO11
IEconomic Development
ED-3 The importance of Downtown Auburn as a unique retail
environment and subregional center of commerce should be
cbnsidered in the City's economic plan.
ED-4 The adoption of Streamline Sales Tax (SST) shall constitute an
emergency for the purposes of amending the Comprehensive
Plan outside,of the noimal amendment cycle in order to, among
other items, implement the intent of Auburn City Council
Resolution No. 3782, . if needed. As a result of the
implementation of miti atp. ion pavments bv the State of
Washington, the City has not detercnined an emerg�y exists.
howevei the Ci reserves the ri ht to make 's deYermination
and implement all necesS3Ty,_policies and measu .should ese
miti�ation payments cease or other policies, actions.or events
occur that the Citv believes constitute an.emereencK
Cf
Objective 9.2. Produce commercial and industrial siting paCeies w�chtaze based on the
assessment of local needs and the availabi�ity o�'tra�'sportation and other
infrastructure required to serve it. ���`
�;�
ED-5 Deyelopment of industrial?'ar����ould be based on performance
standards appropriate�for the�ite d with appropriate flexibiliry
within those st�d�_rds to accommodate changing mazket
conditions. `��,
.�,
ED-6 Revitalize dept ated and/or obsolete commercial and industrial
sites `�tttioftgh, in�varive regulations that redesign the site in
acc rdanCe�;:"�'�ith modern design staadards and
i du iaUoommercial uses:
��t.
EDf��?���;Uses which serve regional needs and purposes (such as major
+ ihdus�rial plants) must be sepazated from community serving
�''�:,. u�es in order to minimize�c and other conflicts.
,��
Objective 9.3. Develop effeotiye land use polices,and economic development strategies
that provide long-term and stable employment, increase per capita income
and reduce the tax burden of?,ubum residents.
ED-8 A_ubiun should continue to provide an economic base not only
for the Aubwn azea 6ut also for the south King County and north
Pierce County region:
ED-9 Implementation of economic development programs shall be
con§istent with the policies of this Plan.
Page 8-7
�.�epded
�994Dra 2011
IEconomirDevelopment
ED-10 T'he City should develop a formal economic development
strategy as an element of the Comprehensive Plan to specif cally
identify the types of businesses most consistent with coinmunity
aspirations and lay out a program to attract those businesses.
a. The City should work cooperatively with other govemmental
agencies in its economic development efforts, including the
Muckleshoot Tribe, King County, Pierce Counry, tlie Port
and the State.
b. The City should implement its economic d�` lopment
strategy throngh a partnership with the pridate sec�o�
�
c. Identified in the 2005 Economic Develop�m�en aStrategies
documents are six strategv are�,�with�tw�onal
strategy areas. These econom�c de'veloprr3ent stcategv areas
are tareeted-for population and{".cinployment erowth to meef
the City's 2U-yeaz (2031] ,g�'flwth�5 targ`"'"et°�. Sub-area -olans
should be developed for these stratea�='areas. The economic
ro. c zc.
develooment shateev at�as•.azer�s fo7Iows:
e Aubum Wav North'��maor
• Auburn Wav::South Corridor
• Urban Cente� R
e Aubum�nvironmental Park and Green Zone
e 15`"�Siree�:SW/C Street SW/West Vallev
Hyi �a"f Su ermall
e A��Y� � � CO1TIdOI'
f;a:� Sfi�312 "�Street/124'�' Aveaue.SE Corridor
i`l �'M `�Street SE between Auburn Way North_and-Auburn
:,��/�;�<South
1<!.•�
h�
� �•h}.�. . .
R
ED-1 i Ensure that economic development strategies are reyiewed
�iegularly in order to be flexible and respond to changes in the
market.
ED-12 The City should work with the private sector, school districts and
Green River Community College to develop programs to provide
. training. Considerarion of special needs of economically.
disadvantaged ci6zens and neighborhoods and people with
physical impairaients and developmental disabilities should be
included in these programs.
Page 8-8
�
�994Draft 2011
� Ec000mic Development
ED-13 Support continued development of the Sound Transit Commuter
Rail system, as an important means of expanding the City's and ,
the region's economic base.
ED-14 Ciry infrastructure plans . and programs should take into
consideration economic development plaris and prograins:
ED-15 Implement the recommendations of the City's 2005 Economic
Development Strategies brochure includine the addition of the
SE 312th Street/124�' Avenue SE corridor and M Street SE
between;Auburn Wav North and Auburn Way Soath. 1"he Citv's
20-year housing and employrrment growth shall be con�kntrated to
these economic development strateg,�eas..- � � �
ED-16 Warefiouse and distribution land uses are not a p�r�'fened ion�
teim economic development and land u,�g.priorktv fo rndustrial
zoned areas in the City due to the loss�b�les ta�c revenue
associated with the State's im lemCen rion of' treamlined sales
tax legislation in 2008. no substan've �`onU`�tb$`�ion to an increase
in-per canita income foi Aubnrn resident�,,�°`io reduction in the tax
burden of Auburn resideit s�. �owa�°m��yment densities, lower
vroperty values and land u�`e�aile''Ktciencies.
wa� �`
ED-17 Manufacturin�attt�'eindusu�ial and uses should be the Citv's
refecred eco omic� velo ment and land use riori for
industrial ed.�areas f the City currently dominated by
wareHouse and�istriburion land uses. T'he City should revise
current�'' rePiensive olicies and re ulations to rovide for
and.requfie "e�onversion of existing warehouse and distribution
and u es�o manufacturin and industrial land uses.
�
� �
ED,1J'� o uce economic im acu resultin from the redevelo ent of
%� p�op ies from warehousing and distribution uses to
'�'':� mgnufacturine and industrial uses the City should develop and
�implement a limited term_transition nlan that contains among
other thines both incentives for conversion and disincentives for
not coavertins.
ED-18 To support continued sales tax revenue erowth opnortunities in
the City, those areas currentiv dominated bv existine and
warehouse land uses that abut existin¢ commercial retail azeas
and coiild take advanta�e of thisproximitv to realize substantive
value.�bv changine to commercial retail uses should be
considered for changes in comprehensive plan and zonina
Page 8-9
r3mewded
�994Draft 2d11
I Economic Development
I desienations that would facilitate the conversion of these
pronerties to commercial-retail land uses..
D-19 Re lato and financial incentives will be identified and
i�lemented where appronriate to provide- .increased
opportunities and encouragement for the establishmenf of new or
expanded manufacturin�and industrial usesand jobsin the Ciri.
, Objective 9.4 Maintain an adequate supply of land to support fuhire economia
development and assure the availability of economio-oppo�es for
future generations.
� ED--�620Economic development programs should be vie�v�,as a �J'�y to
shape the character of.the City's future economy'�ther tfian
merely respond to market trends as they Ezccur. �
�.
� ED-�21 Land suitable for lazge scale developinent� Region Serving
Area of the City should be it�entr�ed�nd designated for
e.
economic development. �rF�
� �� �,>
�:{'���.. $
a The integity of lazge, aU�fi�usly owned properties suitable
for industrial use,�}5hould$�e�conserved by use of appropriate
industrial su on standards.
,.����
b. The Cit�shonld ide�'ntify and resolve any environmental
constraints��fecring such land by means of the appropriate
enviifosimental;seview procedures as eazly as feasible.
Y �
- 7b,. �%'v�;jFY�`f .
cfi%`�7'tie iieed to support such land with the necessary
`�� itifrast}?�'cture should be considered in the development of the
4.4�
sv�s":�.4,'''City's public facility plans.
�:' h �tir
Cn ':�
.,�5 �.
�'''w::. d:?� Innovative and flexible development regulations ;should be
�'-��' utilized to enable the development of environmentally
constrained sites while protecting those characteristics.
Objecrive 9.5 Utilize the Ciry's unique environmental opportunities and planned
infrastructure to build on and support economic deyelopment efforfs..
� ED-�S22Integrate the Auburn Environmental Pazk (AEP) into the.City's
economic developmeat efforts by encouraging compati6le high
tech businesses to locate in its viciriity. Amend regulations to
establish appropriate land uses for that azea as well as develop
Page 8-10
femexded
�899Draft 201I
IEconomic Development
strategies and incentives to promote the azea as a "Crreen Zone"
for ecoriomic development.
� ED-�423 Utilize the future extension of I Street NE as an economic
development opportunity. Development of I Street NE should
estalilish it as stanil alone coiridor and not a "liack side" to
Aubum Way North. Conditional use permit applications for,
commercial uses and nursing homes along tliis corridor and
whose impacts can be adequately mitigated should be supported.
� ED-2A4 Use the M Street SE underpass and development of.M Street SE
and R Street SE bypass connection as an opportuni{� t�o create
and encourage the clustering of complementary biisiness and
' servicesin that azea. �'•'
���;.
�•:
�'M:,
� ���
a'�> ��
� � �::>...
�� �� �
�v'.::�;�'�;
f.{ ��:
.
;',,;,`i
''` �;i
O�
:'�
j��.c
.!.''' �
F
%•\ '':S`Y.rl�-`n��
� M.
<� �� z.M.
4. �"
�� .
Page 8-11
rlmendet�
�994Draft 2011
i
ISee a es 9-S and 9-34 throueh 9-36 for.changes re[ated to c[imate.
chanQe:se"e riapes 9-ll !or chaitpes related to a/ternative nowe�ed
ve/iicles
CHAPTER 9
THE ENVIROl�T1VIENT
_ _- _ �
Introduction � . �
_ One of the key amactions of.Aubiirn and the P�ttget Sotind Region has
always been the abundant natural resources fdt�nd�i�tcoughout the area.
The Green River Valley was once>a major�Jier o�f�'gicultural goods
for the region and farming rema;nc in so pa°�ts o�the valley. T'hick
forests, wetlands, and wildlife habitats are foun�oughout the area. As
the area develops, many of these fea es,�u serve to make the area
amactive in the first place, are lieing`'-�tUSt. strong emphasis placed on
the designation and protectipi3�of reso�., ands and critical areas in the
Growth Management Act,�'�[e Gountywide Policies and this plan reflect
the important role that,d�ese a�`r�8s play in maintaining ttie health, safety
and welfare of the aze�s citizens.�`
Issues �
Environmental
Constraints ,�.
and Land Use Tlie: City's overall environmental policy should describe the kinds of
env'u"�uental information and factors that aze important to the
commum�y. 'This information can be used to decide if; where and how
certain kinds of development and other activities should be allowed.
City policy .should recognize the natural cons�aints placed on
development by such factors as unstable slopes, flooding and wetlands. A
critical environmental concem is the proper management of gravel
extraction. This is an industry which has been active in Aubum for many
years and which remains a viable industry. The City should establish clear
policies to guide the retention of valued aspects of the City's environment,
such as prbtection of tlie City's open space and significant wildlife
habitats. The policy should seek to ensare ample opportunity for the
I Page 9=1
��
Draft 201 I
IEnvironment
City's residents to meet their recrearional needs. Policies should be
established to protect the public health, safety and qualiry of life, abd to
also protect the azea's most unique, sensitive and productive
environmental resources. New development should be directed toward.
azeas where their adverse impacts can be �n;mized.
This Plan has increased the specificity of the City's policies relating to use
and protection of the natural environment. It also provides a set of general
policies which will be used to require the mitigation of significant adverse
impacts.
��
GOAL 18. ENVIItONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES ^
To maintain and promote a safe and healthy environment��res�e 'rn the
quality of life, and to protect the azea's most unigue, s itive and
productive natural resources. To encourage n,aiex,�al res�_ource�dust�ies
wittun the city to operate in a manner wluc� e��es, (rather than
detracts from), the orderly development of the"•�iry. �
� � �
Objective 18.1. To continue to enhance and maintain the qualit}z�o£surface water; ground
water, and shoreline resources in th��Ci'tx att,djReg'ion.
..�l,���.,
Policies: �'
F`i' �`'<'..:..�''
EN-1 The City shall,�seek��ensure adequate and healthful supplies of
domestic w�tei b}y,,pmtecting groundwater from degradation, by
providing fot�surface water infiltration, by minimizing or
prolribi4izig�..unne�essary withdrawals of groundwater and by
.a '�*�a.. .�.
preventuig ,�v�tended groundwater discharges caused by
dist�ur�[ybqan of water-bearing geological formations.
�� l.F"`M1��.��
�}�`�`�
EN,�'��*Stomiwater drainage improvement projects that aze proposed to
"� �scharge to groundwater, such as open water infiltration ponds,
��:;;, s�jall provide for surface water pretreatment desigiied to
'�.�:istandards oudined in the Washington State Department of
� Ecology's Stormwater Management Manual for Westem
Washington. Drainage improvement projects that may potentially
result in the exchange of surface and ground waters, such as
detention ponds, sha11 also incotporate these standazds:
EN-3 The Ciry shall seek to minimize degradation to surface water
quality and aquatic habitat of creeks, streams,rivers; ponds;lakes
and other water bodies; to preserve and enhance the suitability of
such waYer bodies for contact recreation and fishing and to
preserve and enhance the aestheric quality of such waters by
Page 9-2
femea9e�2&FA
Draft 20I I
IEnvironment_
reqiuring the use of cuirent Best Management Practices for
control of stormwater and nonpoint runoff.
EN-4 1'he CiTy will regulate any new storm water dischazges to creeks,
streams, rivers, ponds; lakes and'other water bodies with the goal
of no degradation of the water quality or habitat of the receiving
waters, and where feasible seek opportunities to enhance the
water quality and habitaYof receiving waters.
EN-5 T'he City Shoreline Master Program, shall govern the
development of all designated Shorelines of the City (Map 9.1).
Lands adjacent to these areas should be inanaged ��manner
consistent with that program.
EN-6 Where. possible, streams and river 6anks shou'f��kept in a
natural oontiition, and degraded streamb�stks should be'enhanced
or restored. � F�4:;:�,�
� �.
��� �
EN-7 Uses along the Green and Whit�yRi�rs �fib'uld be limited to
residential; agricultural, open space�, recreational, mineral
resource extraction � �>"'``�ub� $fid quasi-public uses.
Coaimercial development fK6{�ily be allowed on the rivers, if
such development ad"ds new nb�c access.to the shoreline area
and is constructe,d';�manner , __ will protect the shoreline and
water quality o�`the rn�er�through the use of Best Management
Practices. A�..�
EN-8 Storm '�raana�e4`sstructures and facilities located within the
shoie„�line�,en "`� � ent, parklands, or public open space shall
irt oc''�`'`i�'pbrate high standards of design to enhance the natural,
'�&,p���,�protect significant cultural resources and appropriate
�� use:•of the site and surrounding azea. Any such faciliues located
�` �� ' ' the shoreline environment shall be consistent with the
�S�'te Shoreline Management .Act and the City's Shoreline
anagement Program.. If accessible to the general public, such
facilifies should, whenever possible, be designed to preclude the
need for security fenoing; and should use native vegetation and
be pmperly maintained.
EN-9 Tlie Ciry shall discourage the use of septic tanks except in tt►ose
areas wlvch are desigaafed for Residential Conservancy_and have
suitable soils.
Page 9-3
�n�6}A
Draft 2011
IEnvironmeot
EN-]0 The City's design standards shall enswe that the post
development peak stormwater runoff rates do not exceed the
predevelopment rates.
EN-11 The City will seek to ensure that the quality of water leaving the
City is of equivalent quality to the water entering. This will be
accomplished by emphasizing prevention of pollution to surface
and ground waters through education programs and
implementation and enforcement of Best Management Practibes.
EN-12 1'he City shall continue to work with adjacent jurisdictions to
enhance and protect water quality in the regio i through
coordinated and consistent programs and regulations. �
��.
EN-13 The Ciry shall consider the impacts of new developme►�t on water
quality as part of its environmental revxe�; pm�ess and require
any appropriate, mitigating measures. �np�t��n fish resources
shall be a priority concern in such�ews. �a
EN-14 The City shall require the use of Best�Management Practices to
enhance and protect water�yua}ity aS�dictated by the City's Design
and Construction Stand'ards'�'`�and the Washington State
Department of Ecolqgy's St�liater Management Manual for
Western Washin��h In all new development, approved water
quality treatmeiit mea$ures that aze applicable and repre§ent the
best availabl�sc�nce r��technology shall be required prior to
discharging s[o�m waters into the City storm drainage system or
into en��anmentslly sensitive azeas (e.g. wetlands; rivers, and
gro�gdwate��'�...'.•• _
EN-15 �"�ie�Gity;�ecognizes that new development can have unpacts
,�r=�incltuiing, but not limited to, flooding, erosion and decreased
�:,xy �,terquality on downstream communities and natural drainage
'~s;,, c�nrses. The Ciry shall continue to actively partioipate� in
"`�;fleveloping and 'unplementing regional water quality planning
and flood hazard reduction effor[s wittun the Green River, Mill
Creek and White River drainage basins. The findings and
recommendations of these regional efforts, including, biit not
limited to, the "Draft" Special Area Management Plan (SAMP)
for the Mill Creek Basin, the "Draft" Mill Creek Flood Control
Plan, the Cneen River Basin Prograzn Interlocal Agreement; and
the Mill Creek Water Quality Management Plan, sha11 be
considered by the City as Ciry programs and plans aze developed
and updated.
I Page 9-4
�_.._���^-'�o
Draft 20I I
I Environment
EN-16 The Cityrecognizes tlie value and efficiency of utilizing existing
natural systems (e.g., wetlands) for storm water conveyance and
storage. However, these natural systems can be severely
impacted or desuoyed by the uncontrolled release of
con+r�*r+ina+Pd storm waters. Prior to utilizing natural systems for
. storm drainage purposes,. the City shall carefully consider th'e
potential for adverse impacts through the environmental review
process. Important natural systems shall not be used for storm
drainage storage or conveyance, unless it can be demonsuated
that adverse impacts can be adequately mitigated to a less than
significant level
� EN-17 The City recognizes that stormwater treatment aciliiies o not
fancrion efficiently unless maintained. T'he Ci ,�all stnVe to
ensure that public and private stormwater collectior�,,detention
and treatment systems aze properly maintaittied and func�ioning as
designed. � ��
EN-17A Encourage the use of low impactl{e elo�irient techniques in
public and private development pro �ls'�'in order to minimi�P
impervious surfaces and im�°`roYe r�aliry.
. �� � .
. . �s•
• . `RxV� �
I � �:yJ
\�4`�nY
CAi 1 O TL� /�:w.{�`�+,.L..11�?a.�L a �.] � .,,L 1,._.,.1.. ,�R ..
'18'r'��0. �ly, - � � � _ _ � _
� '
)
)
C:�''� �
..v .�
I • r
.�
I �
I Page 9-5
�AaA
Draft 2011
I Environmeut
I
Objective 183. To continue to enhance ancl maintain .the quality of land, wildlife and
vegetarive resources in the City and region.
�.;,� �
�
k��
�y"• ,�"
sa,;�
�
���'' <• wfid
f� � �-0'
x
`$.� h ��
.,t ��� �
�} K..
�}�.:}��-0 .
G: G:
' C�: C�:
.. ��::+ r;,Ei}:+f
�? S'.
�4 a�
,.��i
�;:;.�1.. `w�
�t. ��„'h
. . . ){ �1M! , .
��,y {:
�� ,� .
A� � �
. �.�yin f4JiYiMtiv
, .y�y� :
�/l�t.
Page 9-6
�}&
Dnft 2011
IEnvironment
Policies:
EN-23 The City shall seek to protect any unique, rare or endangered
species of plants and animals found within the City by preventing
the indiscriminate . and unnecessary removal of trees and
groundcover; by promoting the design and development of
landscaped areas which provide food and cover for wildlife; and
by protecring and enhancing the quality of aquatic habitat.
EN-24 The City shall consider the impacu of new development on the
quality of land, known or suspected fish and wildlife habitats .
(Map 9.2) and vegetative resources as a part of its en��'1`pnmental
review process and require any appropriate mitigating m ures.
Such mitigation may involve the retention of si�� ha itats
and the use of native landscape vegetation.
EN-25 The preferred method of crossing a w � rc��that has habitat
suitable for anadromous fish use ar"�at has the potential to be
rehabilitated for fish use in the fE�ture�s a�bh�'dge. The use of .
culverts shall be discouraged as a ctvsstng method for such
watercourses. Culvert sys�� m�bexionsidered if streambeds
similar to natural chanaels��`""� be provided, no loss of
anadromous fish habitat wil��occur or the cost of a bridge is
prohibitive as rea�p"tiable methocT of mitigation.
�6'�
EN-26 The City st�l w�qrk�llaborarion with other agencies, the
development uaity and other affected or interested parties
to pmtect�ide 'fied wildlife corridors and encourage the
cl��rin����'sigmficant or adjacent resources to maintain
conneptivit�r of these systems.
�,'�'�`�"'`°�
Objecrive 18.4. To,c6ntinu��do enhance and maintain the quality of important wedand
res,ources w�th�City and region.
Poli i st.�r�'�
EN-27 The City recognizes the important biological and hydrological
roles that wetlands play in providing plant and animal liabitat,
protecting water qualiry, reducing the need for man-made flood
and storm drainage systems, maintaining water quality, and in
providing recreaYional, open space, educational and cultural
opportuniries. The City will consider these mles and functions in
all new development and will also pursue opportunities to
enhance the existing wetland system when these multiple benefits
can be achieved.
I Page 9-7
._.,..,�,,.�'.o
Draft 201 I
IEnvironment
EN-28 The City recognizes that wedands pmvide varying degi�ees of
biological and hydrological functions and values to the
community depending on the size, complexiry and location of the
- individual system, and that the overall degree of functions and
values should be considered when reviewing pmposals which
impact wetlands. In a similar manner, the levels of protection
afForded to a wetland.shall be consistent with its e�cisting fiiaction
and values. The Ciry shall continue to promote policies and
practices of enhancing the wetlands that aze hydraulically
connected to the river systems to improve fish resources and
aquatic habitat.
EN-29 The CiTy shall consider the impacts of new dev�Opment on the
quality of wetland resources as part of its environm`°e�al review
process and shalt require appropriate mitigarion;s,and monitoring
measures of important wetland azeas� S�i�'�mitigarion may
involve conservation, enhancement�tir�r,estorat�on oi replacement
of important wetlands, and provisions�or �ropriate buffering.
The goal of the mitigation should b � no� net loss of wedand
funcrions and valnes. A:�ane�'it��deed restriction shall be
placed on any wetlands cii�at�e�`oc enhanced to ensure that they
aze preserved in perpeiuity. ��,�,,;�;�
EN-30 Wedands which,�az�'sp.ciated with a river or stream, or provide
significant pl�nt aud animal habitat opportunities are recognized
by the City ais�the most important wetland systems, and shall
receive ffh'e�JugkeSt degree of protection and mitigation through
con�erva����ancement or relocation measures. Wetlands
�,wIuchyfare united in size, aze isolated from major hydrological
'Sy$�eins�.a��provide limited hydrological or plant and animal
�"�liabitat opportunities may be considered by the Ciry for
de�elbpment and displacement in conjuncdon with appropriate
} a�hgation.
w�
EN-31 Speculative filling of wetlands shall only be permitted if in
compliance with the Special Area Mana�ement Plan for Mill
Creek, when it is adopted.
EN-32 It is the City's intent to pursue development of an area-wide
wetlands management program for tHe entire City to establish a
systems approach to wetlands management. The City shall work
with adjacent communities to adopt and implement the Special
Area Management Plan(SAMP) for the Mill Creek Basin, a draft
version of which has been developed with the U.S. Army Coips
Page 9-8
.__<,,..,,����
r,,,,�„��
Draft 2011
IEnvirooment
of Engineers. The purpose of the SAMP is to establish uniform
wedand definitions aud methodology throughout the planning
area, to develop a regional consensus and predictability by
identifying important wetlands which must be conserved and less
important wedands which�inay be developed. The SAMP is
intencled to ensure a balance of the City's commitment between
envi;onmental and economic development interests. The City
shall strive to streamline the permitting process for development
in the azeas oovered by the SAMP.
Map 93: General Location of Wetlands
, Map Note: This map provides an.illustration of wetlands loc ta�ed�thin
Auburn: Prepazed on an area-wide basis, the inventory �� provi es a
general delineation of known wetlands based on the U.S.'�Corps of
Engineers definition and the' 1989 Fedetal Manual, For,�Jdentifying and
Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands field methot�pla�y;�,�t is important to
note that this map is only a wetland invexrtora�• and nc�i a wetland plan.
Over time wedands develop, expand and�on�tact'�" �'conjunction with
changing climatic, natural and artificial conditio�c�
The map does.not imply that a parc���%� by a wedand designation is
fully occupied by wedands. I��is an i c or, however, that an in depth
wetland delineation is requii�. There ore, future site specific wefland
studies conducted:by th�e,r`property�owner will identify the precise location,
delineation and functiSia,l�characteristics of known wetland azeas, and
additional wetland az�""��t previously inventoried. The Auburn Planning
Department has��orts that can provide information regarding
soils, hydrol , �.ggf2�tibn and wildlife for these wetlands.
4,r
7
Objective 18.5. To reiiognize,�t,,he aesthetic, environmental and use benefits of vegetation
and to pro�ot�its retention and propagation. Consideration shall be given
,n.
to pro�noti�the use of native vegetation:
;��J
Policies
EN-33 The City recognizes the iinportant benefits of native vegetation
including its role in amacting native wildlife, preserving the
natural hydrology, aad maiataining the natural character of the
Pacific Northwest region. Native vegetation can also reduce the
use of pesticides (thereby reducing the amount of contaminants
that may enter nearby water systems) and reduce watering
required of non-native species (thereby promoting conservation).
The City shall encourage the use of native vegetation as an
Page 9-9
.........,..:,,���
n,,,�.�-�o
Draft 2011
I Euviroumeut
integral part of public and private development plans thro.ugh
strategies that include,but are not limited to,the following:
o Encouraging the use of native plants in street landscapes
and in public facilities.
o Providing greater clarity in developinent regulations in how
native plants can be used in private development proposals.
o Pursuing opportunities to educate the pu6lic about the
benefits of native plants.
EN-33A Development regulations shall emphasize the use of nativ.e plant
materials that complement the natural character of the Pacific
Northwest and which aze adaptable to the climatic h , ological
chazacterisrics. of the region. Regulations hould "ovide
specificity as to native plant types in order to faci�t�eiriS'.se.
EN-34 The City shall discourage the unnecessary�bance of natural
vegetarion in new development. �
���
. EN-35 The City shall encourage the use�.of �ater�eonserving plants in.
landscaping for both public and private�i�ects.
.:�;� �
�:
EN-36 .The City shall update and.�uieridRits landscaping ordinances to
ensure that sufficient!•tandscapwa�is a required component of all
development. Em�iasis should�be placed on higher quality and
quantity of lan,dscaping�,,
��" '"'
r�
EN-37 The City shall�t'rerngthen the tree protection ordinance targeted at.
°° ��tand§ of trees and si ficant trees within the
protectin��Jazge, gni
.> �N. �
Ci yy�`�
� ��
EN-38 �> e�4ityssh311 develop a tree planting and maintenance prog=am.
'�l•�, +
t, ��'ct
�'�:4,
Objective 18.6. To 'promo�e energy efficiency and management of resowces in the
development and operation of public facilities and services, as well as in
private development.
Policies:
EN-39 The City shall encourage the use of renewable energy and other
natural resources over non-renewable resources wherever
practicable and shall protect deposits or supplies of important
non-renewable natural resources from developments or activities
which will preclude their future utilization.
Page 9-10
�en�&F9
Draft 2011
IEoviroement
EN-40 The City of Aubum Energy Management Plan is hereby
incorporated as an element in this Comprehensive Plan.
EN-41 The Ciry encourages site design practices t�at maximize winter
expbsure to solaz radiation.
BN-41.A Tfie Ciry shall encourage and promote enerev efficiencv and
enviionmental qualitv bv supportin�the use of alternative mod'es
of power for vehicles, especially those using sustainable energy
sowces. and sunuorting a broad range of opportuniries for
recharge of electric veHicles_
Objective 18.7. Enhance and maintain the quality of life for the City'�inhabitan by
promoting a healthy environment and reducing the adver's�,,�unpact of
environmental nuisances. . . �:
"�;:.. ,�
}:.
�`;� ��<>.,
Policies: ��'�Q
�•r ��
��.�:
EN-42 The City shall seek to m�n�mi�e the e�sau�e of azea inhabitants
to the harmful effects of e�c'e'�'s.no�. P.erformance measures for
noise impact on surroundin`g;dV�opment should be adopted and
enforced. �
EN-43 The City shall seek to�` ' ` " e the exposure of area inhabitants
to excessive l�aevels;;nf lig�t and glaze. Performance measures for
light and glar��posure to surrounding development should be
adopted�nd�rnxed.
EN-44 � stiall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabitanu
''�oin�og�,ous plant species.
���,�,�
Objective 18.8. To�'�e�bli�h management policies which effectively contro] the operation
and loc�fion of mineral extraction in the City, in order to reduce the
inherent adverse impacts that sucfi activities produce in an urban
environment.
Policies:
EN-45 The cost effective availability of sand and gravel materials is
needed to support the development of freeways, roads, pubiic
works, and private construction. Mineral exuacrion may
therefore be permitted if in accord with these policies.
Page9,l 1
t�ex�e�9�9,
Draft 201 l�
IEnvironment
EN-46 Existing mineral extraction operations (as specifically authorized
6y a City permit to mine) shall be allowed to conrinue operation
for the duration of, and in accord with, their existing pemuts.
EN-47 Mineral extraction operations shall not be considered a permitted
use in any zoning district. They are to be reviewed as special
uses and shall be conducted only in accord with the �aeasiu�es
needed to mitigate any`adverse impact. Permits for the operation
shall be denied whenever any impact is deemed by the City
Council to be unacceptable or cannot be acceptably mitigated.
EN-48 A fmal grading; drainage and erosion contrbl plai�'?�liall 6e
submitted with every application. Condirions of opeiatioti shall
be spelled out in detail with performance bo� requi�`d to
ensure compliance. Failure to comply with the provisions will be
adequate grounds for suspension and su sequent�termination of
the permit. �'..,� ;�>��
r fj
EN-49 The burden to demonstrate compli`1'nc�e`•�vitli`�i�sepolicies and to
demonstrate the need for a new pernuC'or a renewal of a permit
for any mineral extraction��`p 'erariofi re�solely on the operator.
The burden to operate in comp�fi2fnce with these policies and any
permit issued in accbrd wi�b_,the same shall also be on the
.. �,.�,
operator. >;`�i:..
��` ��..
`v>..
EN-50 The City shal2�consider impacts of mining on groundwater and
surface water�ity as well as possible changes in hydrology as
a result�4o'�f.;We mnning during the environmental review process
an�eq ' e��pTopriate mitigating measures to prevent water
c�nali�.degtadation.
ix��: s:.
�+�. -`�
EN-3:T%���Yf�uteral resource areas or lands are those lands which have high
:Li• .'i'� �}` . ._ . _
qi�alit�resowces that can be commercially mined for a minimum
,,4 s
o�iwenty years (Map 9.4). Properties around wluch urban growth
,v'x-,xs occurring should not be considered as mineral resource areas.
As required by RCW 36.70A.060, the City shall reguire
notification on all plau, short plau, development pernuts and
building permits issued for development witfiin 500 feet of these
lands on which a variety of commercial activities may occiu�that
are not compatible with residential development for certain
periods of limited duration.
EN-52 Additional mineral extraction operations or major expansion of
existing operations onto adjacent pazcels shall be permitted
within mineral resource areas. Impacu of the operations mustbe
Page 9-12
�e�&FA
Draft 201 P
IEnvironment
studied thoroughly under the provisions of SEPA, and the.City
shall require implementation of all reasonable mirigating
measures identified in those studies. Pernuu for the operation
and renewal of permits for existing operations shall be denied
whenever any impact cannot be acceptably mitigated.
EN-53 Additional mineral extraction operations or expansions of
eacisting operations will only be allowed ouuide of mineral
resource azeas where it is advisable to modify slope to create
usable land (or to provide another public benefit associated with
the site) and where the comiriunity will snffer no substanrial short
or long term adverse effect. Impacts of the operntio�j's;xmust be
studied thoroughly under the provisions of SEPA, and�'t�tie,City
shall require implementation of all reason��`e, mid�ting
measures idenrified in those studies. Permits for t�ft�a�operation
and renewal of permits for existing o ions.:�t�all be demed
whenever any impact cannot be accepta�i�ly��ated.
EN-54 New mineral extraction operatio�s� e1�5'�'nsion of existing
mineral extraction operations will n4t ;be permitted in azeas
designated for "open space�4i �> ��''f
�h1.
4�
EN-55 The creation of usable land 'cpnsi"stent with this comprehensive
plan should be tt���d result ot�a mineral extraction operation.
The amount of;ariatena�to be removed shall be consistent with
the end use:r'x V�aile tliis policy shall be rigidly applied to
developed aieas�and to all azeas outside of mineral resource
areas, �ome�,,fle�aibility may be appmpriate within mineral
_ � � 'i��Ce$Y'E,ag;'�0y�'M1:
f�.
EN-56 t�e,,�,, et�e;�ities, erosion control, the effect on community and
�>��the�ea6on of usable land which is consistent with appmved
� Wash�i'ugton State Deparlment of Natural Resources and City
`� I�lamation Plans sha11 be the primary considerations in a
s
���38cision to grant a permit for a new mineral extraction operation
or 4o extend the scope of an existing mineral extraction operation
outside designated mineral resource azeas.
GOAL 19. HAZARDS
To min;m;�e the risk from environmental and manmade hazards to present
and future residents of the commdnity.
Page 9-13
�ea�e�9F9
DraB 20I I
IEnvironment
Objective 19.1. To reduce potential hazards associated with flood plains without unduly
restricting the benefiu associated with the continued development of the
Lower Green River Valley floor.
Policies:
EN-57 The City shall seek to protect human fiealth and safery and to
minimize damage to the property of azea inhabitants by
m;n;mizing the potential for and extent of flooding or inundation.
EN-58 Flood prone .properties ouuide of the floodwa may be
developable provided that such development can eet the
standards set forth in the National Flood Insurance Pro��
EN-59 Any subdivision of property within the flood p�aid��hall avoid
creating lots which would be subject to�Seriousattireats to life,
health and properiy from floodwaters. � ;x,.�
��2
�3
EN-60 Site plan review shall be required de�SEPiY�#�or any significant
(e.g. over the SEPA tlireshold) developm�'`iit in the flood plain.
Appropriate mitigating m€�°"SSw�es�.�hall�be requiied whenever
needed to reduce potential '�ds�;
< ,, ;�:
EN-61 Any developmen � ��� the floodway wlrich would reduce .the
� '"�' hin
capacity of the,�t}oodway�shall be prblribited.
EN-62 The City sl��slis�'enact ordinances and review development
proposaf�"an a m�'a�iuer which restricts and controls the discharge
of�torm�'wv,�r�frAm new development. At a minimum the peak
disc�htatge sate after development shall not exoeeil the peak
"2lischarge.:tate before development.
>�?s,�,. ''+;•>
�i� \`b a::.
E13'=63 T#te City's development standards should require control and
mahagement of storm waters in a manner which min',m;zes
'�pacts &om flooding.
EN-64 The City shall consider the impacts of new development. on
frequently flooded areas (Map 9.5) as part of its enviionmental
review process and require any appropriate mitigaring measures.
As part of this review process, flood engineering and impact
studies may be required. Within FEMA designated 100 year
floodplains, the Ciry of Auburn Regulatory Floodplain, and other
designated frequendy flooded areas,.such mitigation may include
flood engineering studies, the provision of comperisatory flood
Page 9-14
I �e�6�9
Uraft 20I 1
IEnvironment
storage, floodproofing of structures; elevadng of structures, and
downstream or upstream unprovemenu.
EN-65 ;Areas designated as &equently flooded areas should include 100
' . year future condition floodplains wherever future condition flows
have been•modeled and adopted by the City as part of a 6asin
plan.
EN-66 Land uses and public and quasi-public facilities which would
present special risks, such as hazardous waste storage facilities,
hospitals; schools, nursing" homes, and police and fize stations,
should pot be constructed. in "designated frequently fl p ed areas
unless no reasonable altematiye is available. ff these ilities
aze located in designated frequently flooded area��hese fac�'ities
and the access routes needed for their operation;should be liuilt
in a manner that protects public health and�saf��dur ng at least
the 100 yeaz flood. In addirion, special'�ne�,SU�s should be taken
to ensure that hazazdous or toxic substances aze;not released into
flood waters. � � �
x �.
sr ,.r
k ,,jr
EN-67 Developers in floodpronc�"��rea�f�rshaIl provide geotechnical
informarion which iden�e�seasonal high groundwater
elevations for a basis to�design stormwafer facilities in
conformance wifl�;��' design cnteria
EN-68 The Mill Cree�B�sin Fl�d Control Plan, when completed, shall
be the basi's�for the establishment of downstream drainage
condition�.-fgx dev�lopment in that azea.
����
Objecrive 19.2. To ens ' s�v opment is properly located and constructed with
re�jecf�xp�th�lunitations of the underlying soils and subsurface drainage.
tiY'l4 l.
Pohoi s: ��
�;ti� r
EN-69 .The City shall seek to ensure that land not be developed or
otherwise modified in a manner which will result in or
significantly increase the potenual for slope slippage, landslide,
subsidence or substanriai soil erosion. The City's development
standazds shall dictate the use of Best Management Practices to
min;mi�e the potential for these problems.
EN-70 Where there is a high probability of erosion (see Map 9.6),
grading should be kept to a minimum and disturbed vegetation
. should be restored as soon as feasible. The City's development
I Page 9-]5
� A•••••••ninc-naCviv'�iv�
0��
IEnvironment
standards shall dictate the use of Best Management Practices for
clearing and grading activity.
EN-71 The City shall consider the impacts of new development on
hazards associateil with soils and subsurface drainage as a part of
its environmental review process and require any appropriate
mitigating measures.
EN-72 , Large scale speculative filling and grading acdvities not
associated with a development proposal.shall be discodraged a"s it
reduces a vegetated site's natural ability to provide etosion
conh�ol and biofiltration, absorb storm water, and filt__ � spende_d
particulates. In instances where speculative fi.11ing is ' emed
appropriate, distdrbed vegetation shall be restq�as so� as
possible; and appropriate measiires to control osioa and
sedimentation until the site is developed�shall be��quired.
�' ��`"''�
EN-73 The City shall consider the impact�f�ew development on Glass
I and Class III landslide hazard 8teas:z(Map'°'�.7) as part of ifs
environmental review process and �Ceqiure any appropriate
� mirigating measures. The '�mp�act�,b`f tkie`new development, both
during and after consiructio�m�,�ori?�djacent pmperties shall also be
considered. ,� ':{.A..�'�
�
EN-74 Aubum will saek to � tain azeas with slopes in excess of 40
percent as p�'�ninarily ope��space areas in order to pmtect against
erosion and l �' , lide hazards and to lunit significant removal of
vegetati`on�;,to l.' .p conserve Aubum's idenrity within the
me�opol'�!regwn. Slopes greater than 15 percent with zones of
emergent water(springs or ground water seepages) and all slopes
'�fl�vtna�pd�le landslide potential identified by a geotechnical
r# stui�y.1�ha11 be protected from alteration.
�. .
�.�,,� �� -
EN=9$ b City will require that a geotechnical report prepared by a
{�p�rofessional engineer licensed by the State of Washington with
expertise in geotechnical engineering be submitted for all
significant activities proposed within Class I and Class III
landslide hazard areas (Map 9.7). The City shall develop
administrative guidelines which identify the procedures and
information required for the geotechnical reports.
EN-76 New development within Class I and Class III landslide hazard
azeas (Map 9.7) shall be designed and located to m;n;roi�P site
disturbance and removal of vegetation, and to maintain the
natural topographic character of the site. Clustering of struclwes,
Page 9-16
I �e�&�9
Dratt 2011
IEnvironment
,,,;n;mi�ing building footprints, and retaining trees and other
natural vegetation, shall be considered.
Objective 19.3. To reduce risks associated with the uansportation and storage of
hazardous materials.
Policies: ,
EN-77 T'he City shall seek to minimize the exposure of area inhabi;ants
to the risk of explosion or hazardous emissions, and to require
proposal§ involving ihe potential risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances to include specific: easures
which will protect the public health, safety and welfaze
�'�..
EN-78 The risk of hazazdous materials, substances and'wast�s shall be.
incorporated into the City's emergency nuwa,ge�ent programs.
� � �>���-:,.
EN-79 New commercial (other than retail commercial ';:or industrial uses
which involve the transport or stprag� of�ardous materials,
substances or wastes shall only be locat�n that portion of the
designated Region Servi�' ea'�''of�the City between the
Burlington Northem Railro�d•�� and east of the West Valley
Highway. r;::�
.s<>�ti,
EN-80 Any existing�oles�@;,storage or manufacturing of hazardous
materials, substauces or�'tiwastes in the designated Community �
Serving Area��` �the City, or within 2000 feet of a school or
medical�'acilit , 1 be consiilered a non-conforming use and
m
the ity s'�o��' '°2ssertively seek its removal.
F ��'
EN-81 `�� e ent, storage, processing, handling and disposal of any
.�<��h�•material, substances or wastes shall be only in the
� s�act�t compliance with any applicable local, state or fedetal
''�,, lav�v.
.,,�,�•
-:r
EN-82 The City shall consider the impacts posed by new development
on risks .associated with hazazdous materials, substances and
wastes as a part of its enviroamental review process and require
any appropriate mirigating measures.
EN-83 The Local Hazardous Waste Management Plan for Seattle/King
County, and the King County Solid Waste Interlocal Resolution
No. 90-001, are hereby adopteii and incorporated as an element
of the City of Aubum Comprehensive Plan.
Page 9-17
..�,._;,..., ��,�
n.,,�,�,�,�
Draft 2011
IEovirooment
EN=84 The City's surface water, ground water, sanitary, and, storm
diainage systems shall be protected from contamination by
hazardous materials dr other contaminants.
EN-85 Use or removal of eacisting underground storage tanks shall only
be done in the strictest compliance with applicable local, sfate
and federal law.
GOAL 20 POLICIES FOR PROTECTION OF ENDANGERED FISH
SPECIES
The City recognizes thaYanadromous Salmonids require c ean,co�oI;well-
oxygenated water in adequate quantity for survival and es�ially du�g
the critical periods of rearing and migration both before spawnmg and
after juveniles emerge.. Salmonid eggs aze Irighly�a�ected,-dunng
incubation and hatching by water temperatute,fl�w oelncity, water quality
and excessive turbidity. Streams composed;ofc�mplex�6itats with a
high proportion of riffles and pools provide�rodpcti�`e"spawning habitats;
as well as juvenile rearing azeas in eddying�and o�f-c�iannel areas.
�."`?,.
r:. #�� .,
Objective 20.1 To aid in the protection of listed and%�atiii►d�ate endangered fish species.
f} Y�
h.�Y ��'}.ii+'�
Policies: �x �^�g.
EN-86 The City wi3� coptinue to participate and support the various
State, F edera'f'�.�,an'�d local programs including Water Resource
Inventory'Area (W.RIA) No. 9 (Green River) and WRIA No. 10
a
( 'te-St���i`ver)to protect and restore endangered species.
3 ,
EN-87 e�G�`ttyzshall seek to minimize surface water quality and aquatic
{;��`,.ha". t degradation of creeks, streams; rivers, ponds; lakes and
^` otherlwater bodies; to preserve and enhance the suitability of
,�'�`b- such water bodies as habitat for restoration of endangered
�''�'s:species.
EN-88 The City shall obtain information during the review of
development proposals, as it relates xo the Endangered Species
Act, so that best management practices and best availabie science
are considered and included in the City's evaluation and
decision-making process.
EN-89 1'he City shall idenrify the types and qualities of aquatic
resources within its borders and fiirther develop plans and
Page 9-18
�9
Draft 2011
IEnvironment '
pro�ram for the protection and enhancement of these resources
based on their characteristics.
GOAL 21 GENERAI.POLICIES AND REGULATIONS WITHIN AUBURN'S
SHORELINES
The following general policies and regulations apply to all shorelines of
the state that are located in Aubum, regardless of the specific shoreline
environment designation in any one location.
Objective 21.1 Ensure conservation and restoration within Aubum's shorelines�
Polices:
��;�
r'�•
EN-90 Prioritize enhancement and restoration�ffoits public pazks and
public open space lands. �
�
EN-91 Work with owners of o nbl�y-�ed land to encourage
restotation and enhanceme�ai�e�cts.
,�� ��:�
EN-92 Work with the�piiblia. d other interested parties to prioritize
restoration �a.pportunities�identified in the Shoreline Inventory
and Chazact�n Report.
EN-93 ''°`bte be etation restoration, and the control of invasive weeds
.,���tie species to avoid adverse impacu to hydrology,
ar,�educe the hazard of siope failures or accelerated erosion.
EN-9 egrate bioengineering and/or soft engineering approaches into
local and regional flood control measares, infrastructure, and
. related capital improvement projects.
EN-95 Develop a program to implement restoration projects, including
funiling strategies.
EN-96 Monitor and adaptively manage restorarion projects.
Page 9-19' V
At�en�ed-�9�8',
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
EN-97 Continue to workwith the State, King County, Pierce County,
Watershed Resource Inventory Area(WRIA)9 and10 Forums,
the Muckleshoot Tribe, and other governmental and non-
govemmental organizations to explore how local governinents
(with their assistance) can best address the needs of preserving
ecological pmcesses and shoreline functions.
EN-98 Continue to work with the State,King County, Pierce Gounty,
Green River Flood Control Zone District�and the Inter-County
River Improvement Agency to identify and implement flood
management strategies that protect existing developm F t;and
restores floodplain and channel migration functions. �
��
`�3�'t,A
EN-99 Continue to work with the WRIA 9 and�Foru�s t e'store:
shoreline habitats arid seasonal ranges that 4��port listed
endangered and threatened species,.gs well as o�eranadcomous
fisheries. �i ���'?
EN-100 Create incentives that will�a,��:a��conomically or otherwise
amactive to integrate�shoreliue ec�ogical restoration into
developmentproje� ����
b�."`l �`�'.
� :••.
if9- �C. L�V
EN-101 Encourage restorahon or enhancement of native riparian
vegetatiatt thro�ugh incentives and non-regulatory programs.
.;� ��. �,
.: J xs:;,,
.� �,r ,�.<
�^ '��'+
EN-102 stabhsh p�blic education materials to provide shoreline
amdo"�'w`nei�s technical assistance about the benefitsof native
,,v�`��egex\ation plantings.
�'�-.,: �5�:
.,••, �<
'};::. .,'�:
EN-103'u"�xplore opportunities with other educational organizations and
agencies to develop an on-going program of shdreline education
forall ages.
EN-104 Identify azeas where kiosks and interpretiye signs can enhance.
the educational experiences of users of shoreline areas.
EN-105 Develop strategies to fund shoreline-related educational and
interpretive projects.
Page 9-20
A...,��,1,.,!'1/11/1
l�xr�ncco�zvrv
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
Objective 21.2 Shoreline Vegetation Conservation.
Polices:
EN-106 Developments and activities in the Ciry's shoreline should be
planned and designed to retain nauve vegetation or replace
shoreline vegetation with native species to achieve no net loss of
the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes
performed by vegetarion.
EN-107 Woody debris should be lefr in river corridors to e�ildlife
habitat and shoreline ecological functions, except w�'liee�e it
threatens personal safety or critical infrastruchu�;�uch as bridge
pilings. In such cases where debris poses a tfireat, r�tEShould be
dislodged, but should not be removed from' e�°ver.
�t�� �
e
� � ��
Objective 21.3 Environmental Impact Mirigation. � ;Fr
�,�ri � �+.:
Polices: �.�•�;��_
s
EN-108 All shoreline use�,and developm�t should be carried out in a
inanner that avp`ids m,n,m�zes adverse impacts so that the
resulting ecQlogical coqt�itions do not become worse than the
current con��This means assuring no net loss of ecological
functiot�s�d pr�cesses azid protecring critioal areas designated
in•Appendiz�,4,�,,�liapter 16,10 "Critical Areas"that are located in
th�hor�ne. Should a ,proposed use and development
�oten#ially�eate significant adverse environmental impacts not
�.�o�'��wise avoided or mitigated by compliance with the master
progiam, the Director stiould require mirigation measures to
enSure no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
Objective 21.4 Critical Areas.
Policies:
EN-109 Provide a level of protection to critical azeas within the shoreline
that is at least equal to that which is provided tiy the City's
critical azeas reguladons adopted pursuant to the Growth
Management Act and the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Page 9-21
�e�26�0
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
EN-110 Allow activities in critical azeas that protect and, where possible,
restore the ecological functions and ecosystem-wide processes of
the City's shoreline. If conflicts between the SMP and the critical
azea regulations arise, the regulations that aze most consistent
with the SMA or its WAC provisions will goverim.
EN-111 Preserve,.protect, restore and/or mitigate wetlands within and
associated with the City's shorelines to aclueve no net loss of
wetland area and wedand functions.
EN-112 Developmenu in shoreline zreas that aze id€�n�'�d as
geologically hazardous or pose a foreseeable ris{I .to peopT'e•and
improvements during the life of the developme�it �t�ould not be
allowed. `�
�w��� �
. �"4iv
Objecdve 21.5 Public Access (including views). � ��° ��ai{
��
Policies: ;�;'�`� ,�• `�
EN-113 Public access improvementsYsho�ii not result in adverse impacts
to the natural cl��iacter and�uality of the shoreline and
associated wetlan�'s`or.sesult in a net loss of shoreline ecolopcal
functions. I3�evelopme}�ts and activities within the shoreline
should not 'unpait�or detract from the public's visual or physical
access tp¢the w'�er.
EN-114 Protecti���e�ancement of the publids physical and visual
abce s;to shorelines should be encouraged.
';�_ �:`,,��;�ni�'d
��;r'� ..
fi3°"�'4� '�.,
� E1�I']I S 1'}te �mount and diversity of public access to sliorelines should be
� increased �x--�-EnenxeF consistent with the natural shoreline
�°.�tiazacter, property rights, and public safety.
EN-116 Publicly owned shorelines should be limited to water-dependent
or public recreation uses, otherwise such shoielines shonld
remain protected, undeveloped open space.
EN-117 Public access should be designed to provide for public safety:
Public access faoilities should pmvide auxiliary facilities, such as
I Page 9-22.
�g}g
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
patking and sanitation facilities, when appropriate,and should ba
designed to be ADA accessible.
Objective 21.6 Flood Hazazd Reduction.
Policies:
EN-1:18 The City should manage flood protection through the City's
Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan, Comprehensive Plan,
stormwater regulations,and flood hazard azea regulations.
��
EN-119 Discourage development within the floodplain�ated with
the City's shorelines that would 'uidividually or cumulatively
result in an increase to the risk of flood.c��gefi�'�
<>• � ���.
�l ry�
EN-120 Non-structural flood hazard reducfion easures should be given
preference over structural,�neasur�,a�s. �S�uctural flood hazazd
reduction measures shoul��be�2vutfled whenever possible. When
necessary, they should be accomp�shed in a manner that assures
no net loss of ecolOg cal funcfiaTC�and ecosystem-wide processes.
Non-structural eh"asc�res include setbacks, land use controls
prohibiting . limitin��development in areas that �are
historically fl g�ed, stormwater management plans, or
bioengine�enng�,easures.
44 "�• �"�
. . SRt�,.y�``3`.�?•.
EN-121 , Jherr�poSS�ible, public access should be integrated into publicly
#' a'ced�bod control and management facilities.
'����:? M
��'��: �;
Objeorive21.7 Wat�r�u�ity, Storm Water and Non-Point Pollution.
Policies:
EN-122 The City should prevent impacts to water quality and storm water
guantity that would resplt in.a net loss of shoreline ecological
functions;or a significant impact to aesthetic qualities, or
recreational opportunities.
Page 9-23
�g}g
Draft 2011
I Euvironment
EN-123 Storm water management treatment, conveyance, or. discharge
facilities should be discouraged in the shoreline jurisdiction,
unless no other feasible alternative is available.
EN-124 Low impact development techniques that allow for greater
amount of storm water to infilfrate idto the soil should be
encouraged to reduce storm water ran-off.
EN-125 Encourage conservation of existing shoreline vegetation which
provides water quality protection by slowing and filfering storm
water run-off. �
Objecti4e 21.8 Educational and Archeological Areas and Historic Sites. ��,
��
t ki
Policies: ' �:�'�
� ,rl,`�8x, �.
{, R� n�`
EN-126 Where possible, Educational and�: Qic"tieological Areas and
� � ta� ��
Historic sites in the shore�ine:;should be permanently preserved
w::.,
for scienrific:study, education;and;public observation.
. � ��"
�€J ���
EN-127 Consideratioui"�shoul�e given to the National Historic
Preservation��cb,of 1966 and Chapter43.51 RCW to provide for
the pro�tecrion,�.z'ehabilitation, restoration and reconstruction of
�:,.
districts';��stt ,��iuildings, structures and objects located or
associated,�th the shoreline that are significant in American,
,;�as � gto`n., and local history, architecture, azcheology or
-���<;�:;�
,����r.� -k�>.
�
�� },, ���''
EN-l��ere feasible and appropriate, access trails to shorelines should
, mcorporate access to educational signage acknowledging
protected, historical, cultural and archeological sites or areas in
the shoreline.
Objectiye 21.9 Nonconforming Use and Development Standards.
Policies:
EN-129 Legally established uses and developments that predate the
City's Shoreline Master Program.(1973, as amended) should 6e
allowed to continue as 7ega1 nonconforming uses provided that
Page 9-24
�mended-�}A
Draft 2017
I Environment_.
fuhue development or redevelopment does not increase the
degree of nonconformiry-witfi tliis program.
GOAL 22 SHORELINE MODIFICATION
Shoreline modifications aze generally related to construction of a physical
element such as a levee, bulkhead, or pier at or near the edge of a river or
extending into the'channel. Other modificarion actions include dredging,
filling, or vegetation clearing. Modifications aze usually undertaken in
support of or in prepatation for an allowed shoreline use or development.
Objective 22.1 Prohibited Modifications �
� ^,
� '''>•>
The following shoreline modifications a;e prohibited in all shoreline
environments unless addressed separately in this�o�yine'�°master program
j Y �:n
under another use: 4i
1. Breakwaters,jetties, groins and��cs �:��`
2. Dune modifications; and ��
�� � .
3. Piers and docks: r
�
, ,
Y� L
f{..
�`��
Objective 22.2 Dredging Dredge Materialrbispo„�,.
� v�
Policies:
�:��,.J'�
EN-130 Drt�fl�'°g��8�id�d�redge material disposal should be done in manner
�'`�hich�'avoi�s or minimizgs significant ecological impacts. Where
ctsi"'�c `annot be avoided; mirigation measures are required that
,>?'�����n no net loss of shoreline ecological functions.
.;,,'`�
EN-131�Dredge spoil disposal in..water bodies, on shorelands, or wetlands
within a.river's channel migration zone should be discouraged,
except as needed for habitat-improvement.
EN-132 New development shall be sited and designed'to avoid or, if that
is not possible, to minimize the need for new and maintenance
dredging. �
I Page 9-25
�}9
Draft 2011
I Eovironment
Objective 223 Piers and Docks.
Policies:
EN-133 The City should discoutage the consiruction of new piers, docks,
or floats in the shoreline jurisdiction along the Greea and White
Rivers.
Objective 22.4 Shoreline Stabilization(bulkheads and revetments).
Y>�-0
Policies: ����
EN-134 Shoreline stabilization activities that may neCes�i�te new or
increased shoreline stabilization on the same or other affected
properties where there has been ����re�ous need for
stabilization should be discouraged�� �'
��, a <s...s"�
EN-135 New shoreline uses and de�±elo�men� �� be located away
from the shoceline in o�rde��:tq,�preclude the need for new
stabilization structures. >+
>
`$ ,�% �w�
�r
EN-136 Structural or•��`hazd" horeline stabilization techniques and
sVUCtutes sh��;�'ie allowed only after it is demoastrated that
non-struclural � "soft" shoreline protection measures are not
feasible�tF���,�;�
„�� ��'
�'' �3 �;
�?.'s`<., w ,
EN-137 ��� e��umiilative effect of allowing bulkheads or revetments along
�'��"�^ve?�segments.should be evaluated. If it is determined tliat the
�'�i>, c�inmulafive effects of bulkheads or revetments would have an
,� a$verse effect on shoreline funcrions or processes, then permits
"for them should not be granted.
EN-138 Bulkheads should not be pernutted as a solution to geo-physical
problems such as mass slope failure, sloughing, or land slides.
Bulkheads and revetments should only be approved. for the
purposes of protecting existing developments by preventing bank
erosion by the rivers.
Page 9-26
A.......�ll�o .
Draft 201P
IEnvimnment
Objective 22.5 Clearing and Grading.
Policies
EN-139 Clearing and grading activities should only be allowed in
association with a pernutted shoreline development.
EN-140 Clearing and grading activities shall be limited to the minim�
necessary for the intended development, including residential
development.
Ob'ective 22.6 Fill.
, ��;�
Policies: �`'"
�, �'�;a.
��
EN-141 Fill placed waterwazd of the OHWM�uld,b�e prohibited and
only allowed to facilitate wateT dep�d�'`�uses restoration
projects. >'� V�''
�{��'`^��^�:
� z� �r
,;,�,
EN-142 Where permitted,�,6I1�'shouldbe the m;n;mum necessary to
provicle for tl��'�iropose �use and should be permitted only when
tied to a specific development proposal that is permitted by the
Shoreline Mast�'"�,�'`��Program.
��
'x '. .
EN-143 77i p m �r of fill activities:should be designedxo avoid or
�e�tn�'���srosion and sedimentation impacts, both during initial
ill�ctivides and over time.
� V
Objective 22.7 Shorelm�bitat and Natural Systems Enhancement Projects.
Policies
EN-144 All proposed shoreline habitat and natural systems enhancement
projects should assure that the activities associated with each
p;oject address Legitimate restoration needs and priorities and
facilitate implementation of the Restoration Plan developed with
this Shoreline Master Program pursuant to WAC 173-26-
201(2)(�•
Page 9-27
_ I .....,...n,..��'.9
Draft 201 I
I Environmeut
GOAL 23 SHORELINE USE
Shoreline use activiries are developments or activities that e�cist or are
anticipated to occupy shoreline locations.
Objective23.1 Prohibited Uses within the Shoreline Environment.
Policies:
EN-145 The following uses should be prohibited in all shoreline�
environments unless addressed separately in�§#�he Slioretiae
, Master Program under another use: See 'Section8l-��of the:
Shoreline Master Program for definitions of the followtng uses:
,.,;:a<
1. Boat houses; �; �::�:�'�
2. Commercial develp�ent;.,,w,;"a
3. Forest practices; � ��
4. Industrial$evelopaient;�
'�"�;z .
5. New,or expan"ded�uning; and
..s>' v:�
6. P�erinaiient solid waste storage or transfer
�Cilities�```w;,.
�����
Objective 23.2 Agriculture {f;�;.:. �
`F�.�`�^v�..
t•. , •o•
Policies•,��s � 's;�;'+
`r;
`�•��:,�;::Wr
EN-�145;:Tkus�rogram allows for existing, ongoing agricultural activities
�,?£, w�il also maintaining shoreline ecological functions and
}�'`�:, pmcesses.
"r, �:'^'
EN-147 Agicultural activities that do not meet the definition for existing
and ongoing agricultural activities should not be allowed ia ttie
shoreline.
EN-148 Appropriate farm management techniques and new development
construction should be encouraged to prevent contamination of
nearby water bodies and adverse effects on valuable plant, fish;
and animal life from fertilizer, herbicides and pesticide use and
application.
I Page 9-28
�9
� Draft 2011
IEnviroument
EN-149 A vegetative buffer should be encouraged to be placed and
maintained between agricultural,lands and water bodies or
wetlands in order to reduce harmfiil bank erosion and resulting in
sediinentarion, enhance water quality,provide shade, reduce
flood hazard, and maintain lia6itat for fish and wildlife.
EN-150 Public access to the shoreline should be encouraged where it does
not conflict with agricultural activities.
F
EN-151 Proposals to convert agricultural uses to other us�sho��
comply with all policies and regulations established�the
Gomprehensive Plan and this;Master Program for sai u�ses and
should not result in a net loss of ecologi�cai•� c�r�ns.
V��' ��
Objective 23.3 Aquaculture f4'� �� '`^^"�
a jjJx
�� � �`��F
Policies: t�.���,,
EN-152 Aquaculture is a�-a��,a�, ,�e;and when consistent with
control of poll�►tion azt�d•avoidance of adverse unpacts to the
environment�nd g�reserv�tion of habitat for resident narive
species, isan�'OC�Zpted use of the shoreline.
�•,
EN-153 Develop��quaculture facili6es and associated activities,
s�ib�s hatcheries and fish counting stations should assure no net
-1o�s�s,�s�,i�c�eline ecological functions or processes. Aquacultural
��ao ties should be designed and located so as not to spread
se to narive aquatic life,establish new non-native specieg
�ch cause sig�nificant ecological impacts,or significantly
" pact the aesthetic qualities of the shoreline.
EN-154 Since locations foraquaculture activities aze somewhat limited
and requ've specific water quality,temperature, oxygen content,
and adjacent land use conditions,and because the technology
associated with some forms of aquaculture is still experimental,
some la6tude should be given when implementing the
regulations of this section, provided that potential impacts on
existing uses and shoreline ecological functions and processes
are giVen due consideration. Ezperunental aquaculture projects
I Page 9-29
tl�en�e�-�&F9
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
should be monitored and adaptively managed to maintain
shoreline ecological functions and processes.
Objective 23.4 Boating Facilities.
Policies:
EN-155 Boating facilities should not be allowed unless they are
accessible to the gerieral public or serve a community.
EN-156 New boat launching ramps should be allowed only wh�e�r`e�hey
aze located at sites with suitable environmental conditions� '
shoreline configuradons,access and neighboring�l�.
�
,,,;;,y
EN-157 Development of new or modifications to?e 'x;sting boat launching �
ramps and associated and accessor�uses shouldinot result in a
net loss of shoreline ecological funetio'� or ot�ier significaiit
adverse impacts. y''�'
k�«:�� �
06jective 23:5 In-Stream Structural Use. ��r.;�z<��
� �
Policies: �?' . �`"`�
a��,.
`�z.:
�;.
EN-158 Approval ofa plications�'or in-stream structures should require
inclusion of p t sions for the protection and preservation of
ecosystem�de�p�,ocesses, ecological functions, and cultural
resource�;urcTvd'uig,but not limited to, fish and fish passage,
wildlife aiid water resources, shoreline critical areas, hydro
'�" olo' �`ocesses, and natural scenic vistas.
�. .. ���
��`'� '�'A
�" ��,:; .
� .�nY~.�`.:•.
EN=�4� 'I'��e location and planning of in-stream structures should give
�consideration to the full range of public interests,watershed
functions and processes, and environmental concerns;with
special emphasis on protecting and restoring priority habitats and
species.
EN-160 Non-structural and non-regulatory methods to protect, enhance,
and restore shoreline ecological functions and processes aad
other shoreline resources should be encouraged as an altemative
to structuialin-stream structures.
I Page 9-30
A�exAed-2A-1�9
Draft201 I
IEnvironment
Objective 23.6 Mining.
Policies:
' EN-161 Limit mining acrivities neaz the shoreline to eausting mining uses.
Objective 23.7 Recreafion. '
Policies:
EN-162 Prioririie shoreline recreational development that�rovi'd"�ublic
access;enjoyment and use of the water and shorel s of the��
3tate over other non water-oriented recreational ils�
, �,�
EN-�63 Shorelirie azeas with the potential fo�pro�ng�ecrearion or
public access opportunitiesshoulil��'ie.i�enti6ad'for this use and,
whereyer possible, acquired and incorppra�ed into the Publio-
Park and open space system, � ��
EN-164 Public recreational �ilities s 6tt�be located desi ed and
, Sn
operated in a maaner>consistent with the piupose of tfie
environment�,designation}ui wluch they are located and such that
no net loss of.shofeline ecological functions orecosystem-wide
processet& esu�t�..,�
4����
EN-165�cqord�uon of local, state, and federal recreation planning
s 'd be�encouragedso as to mutually satisfy needs Shorelirie
";��• �'`�e�tional developments should be consistent with.the City's
'J Comprehensive Plan and Parks, Recreation and Open Space
��+:, ,�
'��' .
EN-166 Recreational development should not interfere with public use of
navigable waters.
Objective 23.8 Residential Development.
Policies:
Pag'e 9-31
I �F9
Draft 2 11
IEnvironment
EN-167 New over-waterresidences, including floaringhomes,are noYa
preferred use and should be prohibited.
EN-168 New multiunit residential development and land subdivisions for
more than four pazcels'should provide commnniry and/or public
access in conformance to the City's public access planning and
this Shoreline MasterProgram. Adjoining access shall be .
considered in making this determination.
EN-169 Accessory development(to either multiple family or sm.�e�
� family) should:be designed and located to blend into t�ie"S'ft�
much as possible. �
�
EN-170 New residential developmentshould av�id� `[he ne'�d for new
shoreline stabilization or flood hazaz�iseduEtion:measures that
would cause significant impacts to,�oth�pro�ies or public
improvements ora net loss of shorelin�ecqlogical functions..
_ /� Sry�. . ._.
� F.,"xi{, H.' ti`� ,
S%ti ;�:,^'�;� .
Objective 23.9 Signs. �``"f; /?E
, . •tiJ�:SGi�
Policies:
,��r` +��a,
EN-171 Signs shouldt�hesdesigned,`�constructed and placed so that they are
compat�b,�e�vi�e natural quality of ttie §horeline envirorunent
zy_.��
and adjaC�andgnd water uses.
,�,;
i>"�'•••<'•
� �.
�., . <;,>:, �
Objective 23.10 Trans�ortahaii.'"��f
� ?,•:..,
Po"iicies: }p� ."�"
�� ��
EN-172�%Plan, locate, design and where appropriate construct,proposed
roads, non-motorized systems and parking facilities where>routes
will have the least possible adverse effect bn unique or fragile
shoreline features, will not result in a net loss of shoreline
ecological functions or adversely impac4 existing or planned
water-dependent uses. Where other options are available and
feasible, new roads or road expansions should not be built within
shoreline jurisdiction.
EN-173 The number of river crossings should be minimized.
Page 9-32
�__�a�a ,���
m„�-�,�
Draft 201 I
IEnvironment
EN-174 Pazkingfacilities in shorelines are not preferred and shall be
allowed only as necessary.to support an suthorized use and then
as remote from the shoreline as possible.
EN-175 Trail and bicycle systems shonld be encouraged along the White
and Green Rivers wherever possi6le.
EN-176 Joint use of transportation corridors within the shoreli�e
jurisdiction for roads,utilities, and non-motorized tra aSpo�on
should be encouraged. �
EN-177 New railroad corridors should be prolribiieda.
� �:M��
Objective 23.11 Utilities. �_ ��
. �
Policies: �'
EN-178 Utility facilities sho��be d��and located to assure no net
loss of shoreline ecolp�ical func�tions,preserve the natural
landscape an 'stas, ° erv@ and pmtect fish and wildlife
habitat, and 'niz�iize�nflicts with present and planned land
and shoF line � s.
���.:�
4, `jE.°•<..
� ��<. Y,,
EN-179��any uti"hty production and pmcessing facilities, such as
W�p�ants, sewage treatment plants, water reclamation plants,
?�%x"�s�r �p�rts of those facilities that are aon-water-0riented should not
'�;;;; b�allowed in shoreline azeas.
•..,,� �
.
�M��
h
EN-180 Utilities should utilize existing transportation and utilities sites,
rigtits-of-way and'corridors, whenever possible. Joint use of
riglits-of-way and comdors should be encouraged.
EN-181 Transmission facilities for the conveyance of services, such as
powerlines, cables, and pipelines, shall be located outside of the
shoreline azea where feasible. Where no other option exists,
utilities should be placed underground or alongside or under
bridges.
Page 9-33
I �e
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
EN-182 New utilities facilities should be located so as not to require
extensive shoreline protection structures.
EN-183 Where storm water management, conveyance, and discharge
facilities aze permitted in theshoreline,they should be limited to
the minimum size needed to accomplish their purpose and sliould
be sited and designed in a manner that avoids,or mitigates
adverse effects to the physical, hydrologic,or ecological
functions. r
��'^:
EN-184 Stormwater conveyance facilities should utilize e�` g �P
transportation and utility sites, rights-of-way and co�m�'dors,
- whenever possible: ,Joint use of right=o.f-w�y and�corridors
should be encouraged. � �,��
�,/.:i'y.,4
E+l �`y �Wk:i� .
67
GOAL 24 �CLIMATE PROTECTION AND A�R U�3I.[.�EY�
,.. .,, � .
<ti... <
�'3,:,���^`»
In 2009, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 4477 resolvin�join
ICLEI—Local Government��r$ustain�iilitL(ICLEI) and pled ing e that
the Citv of Auburn would v de►�fake ICLEPs five milestones approach to
reduce ereenhoiue gas<�nd air po'�tuion emissions. In 2010.the City
completed an inventor�^yi:•of:�ioth municipa] and communitYQreenfiousegas
emissions usin a�r2 08 b` . ear. The invento entitled Greenhouse Gas
' Inventory for the�it�5a£>A �burn:Washineton, included base veaz
estimates o£�ereenhaise eas emissions and emissions forecasts for veazs
2015 and�2020a7'heinventorv was adoroted as a policv backeround
document�`�'bY'"�the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (see
, C�'mnr he�"e.r�sive P anf Appendix B).
'��, ':�
b`r
The go�l;is to protect human health, private property, publicinfrastructure,
the significant views and visual aesthetics of, from and within the.City,the ,
lone term economic health of the Ciri and recion, and to preserve the
aualitv of life enjoyed within the Citv bv maintainins air aualiri,and
addressing both the causes and effects of climate chan�e.
Ob'ective 24.1. To reduce reenhouse as emissions from all activiries within the Ci of
Auburn and to miti�ate the imnact of cliinate chan�e b�y
implementine the ICLEI `Five Milestones' to reduce greenhouse �
emissions.
Page9-34
I I A•••••••]TR�CT�VC9'LPCO
Draft 2011
IEnvironment
Policies:
EN-185 The Citv shall establish emission reduction targets for municinal
and communitygreenhouse gas emissions.
EN-186 The Ciry shall develona Climate Action Plan that details the
volicies and actions that ttie City will take to reduce greenhouse
Qas emissions and achieve its emissions reduction targets.
EN-187 The Ci shall ensure that a ro riate eenhouse as� 'ssion
reduction strateg:ies and actions aze emploved witb the Ci .<of
Aubum xo achieve its emissions reductionstargets�zy adopring
the policies and implementing the measures containe�sn the
Climate Action Plan. ,��";;z� �
.:, ;%'�:,
EN-188 The Ci shall conduct on oin m�it�"n to3evaluate ro ss
on the im lementation of ineasures to r e or avoid
eenhouse as emissions a"°�d`sme tathe� 's emissions
rednctionstar�eu• �
z
�� .
' e 24 "' ' rces in th�
Citv and Reeion r�" �?•
Y � ``Y
��
IPolicies: �,;,�
��y,�.��<>
9- "` '
a '
' 'o�' �1—
� ��_h_.a a�ilzta
a �
EN-190�he Citv will continue to sunnort ansi�elv on the vari�,l5�te�
Federal and loca nrot�ams to continugxo urotect and enh�es�ii
aualitv ,
E -191 The Citv shall encouraee the retention of ��eeetarion and
enconrase landscanina in order to vrovide filterine of susnended
p1RlFUlaSes. .
I F.LL-192�� CitY_ShalLEt�unort an increaseeSLrole for nublic transnortation
as a mearis to reduce locallv eenerated�it�mi�i9r��.
Page 9-35
A�-29�9
Draft 2011
IEnvironmeot
I E_�LI-193 The Citv shall consider the imnacts of new develonment on ait
ualitv as �n�t of its environmenSaL1[��ew oroce"ss anSl_rea 1I�
anv annronriate mitieatine mea�ute�,
t,
}:�,
�;^{'�`�
4�.4� �
k•"�,\
k,�
�; ';�:.z�
��� �
: '.�. . . �GS:.v`L .
w�
f_A
ff•}
n:>.4 /� i
, y` +.�.r /i . .
. �.v'� i p�}�.
�:Tii'` 'j�:
:�, ~�`'�i<�+
1F�Y
ti� 4�i.
� «.,
.E'r' ,t
YYrt.i.
��
'4�ti4�.
::Y`;:., ,�.
� .v.l�F
�,� `''�%` .
.� � r>..
�
�k v.i.:yv�,,v�.
��ti�
,���~�'��;.
��:,
�y
y5�
•x :
�::2. ..K;r .
��:�r
Page 9-36
n.......a,.a�n�n
rnr�nvcvz�vrv �
Draft 20I1
(See pages 14-211hrough 14-23 for c/ranges related to special plan areas
and pages 14-IS through 14-17for changes related.to manufacturing
prioritization and pages 14-26 through 14-29 for changes related to
economic development strategy areas.)
CHt�P'I'Ela 14
COli�IPREHEllTSIVE PI�AN MAP
Introduction
The predious chapters presented.the goals, objectives and policies intended
to guide Auburn's future physical development: "The Comprehensive Plan
Map presented in this chapter (Map 14.1) applies those policies to the
various areas of the City, by indicating the appropriate locations for
various categories of land use. T'he Plan Map should be consulted together
with the written policies of this Plan when decisions about land use and
public facility development aze consideied.
This chapter also explains the reasoning and intention behind the Plan
Map's land use designations. This sfiould be useful in developing and
applying implementing tools (such as zoning provisions);for interpreting
the Plan Map as it applies to specific regulatory decisions or development;
proposals; and in adjusting or amending the Plan Map when changing
conditions or land use markets warrant.
Finally, this chapter sets forth some special policies intended to deal with
the unique problems or opportunities that exist in certain specific locations
within Aabum. THese specific policies supplement the general goals,.
objectives and policies of eazlier cHapters.
Land Use
Designations:
Plan Map
Residential Categories
Residential Cortservancy
Page 14-1
Draft
2011Ameade�
— �988
C6apter 14
Purpose: To protect and preserve natural areas with significant
environmental constraints or values from urban levels of development and
to protect the City'swater sources.
Description: This category should consist primarily of low density
residential uses (with densities not exceeding one unit per foui acres) in
azeas with environmental constraints and/or azeas requiring special
protection such as the Ciry's watershed, which is a significant water
resource. Examples include the Coal Creek.Springs watershed azea and
low-lying azeas along the Crreen River that are isolated from urban
services. From a prac6cal standpoint, this watershed azea cannotbe readily
served by public facilities due to its physical separation from public
facilities by an existing gravel mine operation that is expected to continue
operationyears into the fixture. The designation will serve to both protect
environinental features and hold azeas for higher density development until
such time public facilities become available.
The azea designated "residential conservancy" allows for a lifestyle similar
to that of rural.azeas since the lower densiry established protects the
critical azeas such as the City's Coa1 Creek Springs watershed. A rural
lifestyle generally includes allowance of fazm animals, streets not urban,in
character (e.g. no sidewalks; sh�eet lights), and limited agricultural type
uses.
Compatible Uses: Low density residential uses consistent with protecting
the City's water resources and environmental constiaints aze appropriate.
Low intensiTy cottage industry appropriate for rurdl areas may be allowed,
subject to review. Uatious public and quasi-public uses which aze
consistent with a rural chazacter may be permitted as conditional uses.
Resource extractive uses can only be allowed if the basic environmental
character of the azea is preserved.
Those azeas with critical azeas shall be appropriate for low density
residential, with the intent to protect environmentally crirical azeas from
impacts associated with more intensive development. These
environmentally critical areas area valued as a community resource; both
for conservation purposes and public enjoyment; provided that the
environmentally critical areas azea protected, low density single_ family
residential use may be appropriate.
Criteria for DesignaHon: This designation should be�applied to azeas
with either significant environmental values worthy of protection or to
those azeas which may pose environmental hazards if developed, such as
Page 14-2
Draft
201 I AfaenAec�
�899
Comp.Plsn
Map
azeas tributary to public water sources. It may also be appropriate, to a
limited extent, as a means of delimiting the edge of the City or to areas
tliat aze impractical to develop to urban levels until a later time period dne
to pre-existing development pattecns and the absence of public facilities.
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Due to the cosu of
pmviding City services to these areas, this designapon should be applied
sparingly. It should be applied as a means of conserving significant
environmental resources, to achieve watershed protection and/or to areas
where development served by public facilities has been made impractical
due to pre-existing use patterns.
Appropriate Implementation: The RC (residential conservancy) district
wiII implement ttris designarion.
Single Family
Purpose: To designate and protect azeas for predominantly single family
dwellings.
Description; This category includes those azeas reserved primarily for
single family dwellings. Implementing regulations should provide for an
appropriate range of lot sizes, clustered and mixed housing types as part of
a planned development.
Comparible Uses: Single family residences and uses that serve or support
residential development, such as schools, daycare centers, ctiurches and
pazks shall. be con§idered apprbpiiate and may be permitted on a
condirional basis: Other public buildings and semi-public uses may be
permitted if designed and laid out in a manner which enhaaces rather than
detracts from the residential character of the area. In siting such uses,
however, special caze shall be given to ensuring adequate parking,
landscaping, and traffc circulation with a minimum of conflict with
residential uses. Uses which generate sigrificant traffic (such as large
churches) :should only locate on developed arterials in azeas zoned for
institutional uses.
Intrusion of industrial uses into any of these single fanuly azeas shall be
prohibited. Only very limited commercial uses such as home occupations
or stricUy limited appmpriate conditional uses can be allowed.
Planned developments should be favorably considered in these
designations in order to allow optimal flexibility. In providing such
flexibility, the emphasis should be on small alley-loaded lot single family
Page 14-3
Draft
2011A�e�
— �A99
Chap�rl4
development, limited low density multifamily housing and a mixture of
types, and design diversity should be sought. Except where conditional
use permiu have been previously granted, alternate slructure types.should
not exceed more than 40 percent of the units, and altemative sttuctares
should in most cases contain no more than fow dwelling nnits each.
However, where substantial offsetting community benefits can be
identified, such altemative structures may be allowed to contain more than
three units each.
Criteria for Designation: Areas suitable.for tlus designation include
those azeas designated in goals and policies of this Plan as single family
azeas. Consistent with those policies, azeas within the Community Serving
Area of the City suitable for this category should be reserved for these
uses. This designation should also be applied to azeas adjacent to lower
density residential plan designations.
ConsideraHons Against Apptying this Designation: This desigaauon
' would not be generally appropriate (although exceptions may exist) in the
following azeas:
1. Areas with high volumes of through h�affic.
2. Areas developed in or more appropriate under the Plan
policies for another use.
3. Areas within the Region Serving Area of the City.
Appropriate Implementallon: Three zones may be used to implemeat
this category:
1) R-1: Permits one dwelling unit per net acre. This zone is primarily
applied to areas designated as wban separators under the King
County Countywide Planning Policies where rezones from existing
densiues (typically one unit per acre) aze not allowed for a 20 year
period and/or to areas with significant environmental constraints. If
may also be applied in limited instances to azeas where greater ,
densities are limited by environmental constraints.
2) R-5: Permits 4-5 dwelling uniu per net acre. This zone is
intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for
single family dwellings. Duplexes aze conditionally permitted
subject to meeting infill residential design standards. It is intended
to be applied to the relatively undeveloped portions oP the City,
Page 14-4
Draft
201 1 t�+ner+Ae�
�999
Comp.Plan
Map
azeas where existing development patterns aze consistent with the
density and upland areas where greater densities would strain the
transportation system.
3) R-7: Permits5-7 dwelling units per net acre. This zone provides
for `relatively small lot sizes. It may be applied to the older
neighborhoods of the City and reflecu the typically smaller lot
sizes.found there. Application of this wne shouldbe considered
for areas considered appropriate for a mix of housing types,
pazticularly in some of the Special Planning Areas as discussed
below.
Moderate Density
Purpose: To provide a transition between single family residential areas
and other more intensive designations; as well as other activities which
reduce the suitability of potential residential azeas for single family uses
(such as high traffic volumes). In so doing, this clesip�ation will offer
opportunities for housing types which balance residential amenities with
the need to provide economical housing choice„ in a manner consistent
with conserving the chazacter of adjacent single family areas.
Descriprion: Moderate density residenrial azeas aze planned to
accommodate moderate densities of varying residential dwelling types.
Appropriate densifies in these areas shall range from 8 xo 10 units net per
acre and potentially 16 units per net acre, where properties have &ontage
on an arterial or residenrial collector. Dwelling types would generally
range from single family uniu to mulriple-family dwellings, with lazger
structures allowed (at the same overall density) where offsetting
community benefits can be identi5ed. Structures designed to be occupied
by owner-managers shall be encouraged witliin this designation.
Compatible Uses: Public and quasi-public uses that have land use
impacu similaz to moderate to trigh density residential uses aze appropriate
within this category. Also, uses wlrich require access to haffic (such as
schools and churches) aze appropriate for these azeas. Cazefully developed
low inteusity o�ce, or residentially related commercial uses (such as day
care centers) can be compatible if developed properly. This designation
can include manufactured home pazks.
Criteria for Designation: Areas particulazly appropriate for such
designation aze:
Page 145
Draft
2�11�kmen�
�889
Chapter 14
1. Areas between single family residential uses and all other uses.
2. Areas adjacent to, or close to arterials designated in tlie
transportation element.
3. Existing manufactured home pazks.
4. Areas sandwiched between higher intensity uses, but not directly
served by an arterial.
5. Urban infill azeas not appropriate for single fanuly uses 6ut.alsp
not capa6le of supporting higher density uses.
ConsideraHons Against Applying this Designation: Areas to generally
be avoided by moderate density residential designations include:
I. Areas surrounded by iower densiTy uses.
2. Areas more appropriate for commercial or higher density uses due
to traffic or extensively developed public facilities.
3. Areas within the Region Serving Area desi�ated by this Plan
(except as otherwise provided by the Plan).
4. Any areas not planned to be served by water and sewer systems.
Appropriate Implementarion: This designation can be implemented by
two zones:
1) R-10: Pernuts 10 dwelling units per net acre. The zoning allows
single family dwellings and duplexes as permitted uses.. Multiple-
family dwellings, some residential supporting uses; and
professional offices as part of a mixed-use development may be
permitted as conditional uses.
2) R-16: Permits 16 dwelling units per net acre.. The zoning allows
for a variety of housing types, include single family, duplexes, and
multiple-family dwellings and mixed-use development.
3) R-MHC: Manufactured/Mobile Home Community permits the
development of manufactured home pazks on property that is at
least 5 acres in size. The base densiry is 10'dwelling units per net
acre.
Page 14-6
Draft
2011A+xeAded-
�999
Comp.Plan
Map
High Density
Purpose: To provide an opportunity for the location of the most
economical forms of housing in azeas appropriately situated for such uses
under ttie policies of this Plan.
Descriprion: Ttris category shall be applied to those areas which are
either now developed or aze reserved for mulriple family dwellings.
Densities may range from 16 to 20 units per acre. Dwelling types may
range from single family units to apartment complexes, and may inclnde
manufactured home pazks when located adjacent to major arterial streets.
Adequate on-site open space azeas should be provided for all multi-family
developmen;s. Densities exceeding 20 units per acre and special
developmen4 standards may be authorized for senior housing projects;
within the Downtown azea and within 1/4 mile of regional transit service.
Compatible Uses: Compatible uses azg similaz to those idenrified under
the other residential categories, except hi�her intensities of use may be
appropriate. Public uses and open spaces which tend to visually relieve
the high density cliaracter of these azeas should be encouraged.
Criteria for Designations In addition to areas.already developed to this
density, this desig►ation should be applied only to areas which have or
may be most efficiently served with high capacity and high quality public
services and facilities. Of particular conoern is the provision of adequate
tr�c circulation, and this category shall only be applied to areas with
developed arterial.access. Other siting concems may include access to
commercial servic.es.and open space amenities. This category may also be
applied to areas which aze threatened with deterioration and multiple
family dwellings offer the potential for rehabilitation.
Consideralloas Against Applyiag, this Desi�uation: Areas not
appropriate for tfiis zone inclucle aazeas surrounded, without physical
sepazation,.by lower intensity uses:,
Appropriate Implementation: This designation can be implemented by
two zones:
1) R-16: Peimits 16 units pgr ;net acre. The zoning allows for a
variety of housing types include single family, duplexes, and
multiple-family dwellings and mixed-use development.
Page 14-7
Draft
S��Aaaen�ed
�999 ,
Chapterl4
2) R-20: Permits 20 units per net acre and multiple-family residential
and mixed-use development. Residential supporting uses and
some professional offices are permitted as conditional uses.
3) R-MHC: Manufactured/Mobile Home Community permits the
development of manufactured home pazks on property that is at
least 5 acres in size. The base density is 10 dwelling units per net
I acre:_
In no case should these uses be authorized for construction until all
I
appropriate public faciliries aze available to full standard.
, Publicty or Quasi-
Publicly Owned or
Public Access
Categories
� Open Space
Purpose: To ensure adequate open space amenities for present and futute
residenu by reserving and protecting important open space resowces and
to identify lands useful for public purposes (RCW 36.70A.150) as well as
open space corridors(RCW 36.70A.160)as reqaired by the GMA.
Description: This category shall be applied to areas which aze to be
managed in a lazgely open sgace character, It includes parks, watersheds,
shoreline areas, significant�wildlife habitats, lazge storm drainage ponds,
utility corridors with public;access and azeas with significant development
restrictions, such as steep slope and flood hazard azeas.
Compatible Uses: Appropriate uses include low intensity recreational
uses, low density residential uses and associated open areas, wildlife
habitat, stortnwater detenrion, watershed and similar low intensity uses..
Criteria for Designa6on: This designation should be applied to any site
in which exists a significant developmental hazard or open space value
suitable for public protection without unduly encroaching on private
properry rights.
Appropriate Implementation: Where land in this category is owned
publicly it shall be implemented by the P-1 Public Use District. Land in
this category which is privately owned will generally be zoned for low
density residential use. Where the open space is linear it may be
appropriately managed by means other than zoning, such as public
Page 14-8
Draft
2011 Atr�ende�
2994
Comp.Plsn
Map
ownership or easements, particdlazly as development takes place on
adjacent `iand. The Shoreline Ivlanagement Program shall regulate the
open spaces designated adjacent to the rivers: Subdivisions of property
' involving steep slope or shoreline-azeas shall consider these development
limitations and avoid creating inappropriate or unbuildable lots.
Public and Quasi=Public
Purpose: To designate azeas of significant size needed to provide public
and quasi-public services to the community.
Description: Tlris category includes those azeas which are reserved for
public or qdasi-public uses of a developed character. It is intended to
include �those of a significant extent, and not those smaller public uses
wluch aze consistent with and may tie included in another desig�ation.
Public uses of an industrial character, such as the General Services
Administration, are included in the industrial designation. Streets, utilities
and other public activities supporting other uses aze not considered
sepazate uses and aze not so mapped. T'his designation includes lazge
churches, private schools and similaz uses of a quasi-public character.
Developed parks are also designated under this category.
Compatible Uses: Uses more appropriately designated under another
category should not be designated under this category, iaespective of
ownerslup. Industrial and commercial uses which are affiliated with and
managed by educadonal institutions for vocational educational purposes
may be classified as a public use and permitted on a conditional basis.
Criteria for Designation: Designation of these azeas should be consistent
with tlie character of adjacent uses.
Appropriate Implementation: This designation will generally be
implemented bythree zones:
1) P-1 (Public Use) District provides for ihe location and development of
public uses.that serve,the cultural, educational, recreational;and public �
servioe needs of the community.
2) I (Institutioaal Use) District provides for similaz uses, but includes
schools and typically allows a much bYoader list of uses.
3) LF (Landing Field) District provides for the operarion and
management of the Auburn Municipal Airport.
Page 14-9
Draft
2011�e�
— �
C6apter 14
The designation can also be .unplemented as a conditional use under
various zones. Approval of.these types of uses (and open space uses), not
individually designated on the Plan Map, under a conditional use permit or
rezone consistent with or related to adjacent zoning, sfiall not be
considered inconsistent with the designations under this Plan.
Commercial Categories
Light Commercial
Purpose: To create people oriented comm8rcial azeas to supply a wide
range of general commercial services to azea residents.
Description: This category represenu the prime commercial desigi�ation
for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commeicial
azeas should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and
attracts pedestrian oriented activities. The ambiance of such azeas should
encourage leisure shopping and should provide amenities conducive to
attracting shoppers.
Compatible Uses: A wide range of consumer oriented goods and seryices
are compatible within this designation since the emphasis would be on
performance criteria which create an amactive shopping environment.
However, uses which rely on direct access by velucles or involve heavy
truck tr�c (other than for merchandise delivery) aze not appropriate in
this category. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be
prohibited. Permitted uses would consist of retail trade, offices, personal
services, indoor eating establishmenu, financial institutions, goverivaental
offices, and similaz uses. Mulriple family dwellings should be encourag8d
as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the
shopping character of the azea, such as within the upper stories of
buildings. Since tavems can break up the continuity of people oriented
areas, taverns would be pernutted generally only as a conditional use.
Drive in windows should only be allowed as ancillary to a permitted use,
and only when carefully sited under the conditional use pemut process in
order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not seriously
affected.
, Criteria for Designation: This designation should include moderate
sized shopping centers, and centrally located shopping azeas. This
designation should be preferred for commercial sites where visual and .
pedestrian amenities aze an important concem outside of the downtown.
Page 14-10
Draft
2011 Prt�ex�ed-
�884
Comp.Ptan '
Msp
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Commercial areas_
which can not be readily sepazated from high traffic volumes (such as
shallow lots along busy arterials) should not be included in this
designation. Areas not lazge enough for sepazation from any adjacent
heavier commercial or industrial area sliould not be designated as light
commercial..
Appropriate Implementation: This desigiation is implemented by the
Gl Light.Commercia( District. This district provides for a wide range of
small and moderate scale commercial orieated towards the leisure shopper
ancl pedestrian oriented activities.
Downtown
Purpose: To create a vibrant people oriented downtown which serves as
the business,govemmental and culhual focal point of the Community tHat
includes multifamily residenrial development.
DescripHonr This category is intended to be applied only in Downtown
Aubum. The area should be developed in a manner which is consistent
with and attracts pedestrian orientecl activities. The ambiance of the
downtown should encourage leisure shopping, should provide services to
local residents, area employees and should provide amenities conducive to
attracting visitors and shoppers.
Compatible Uses: A broad mix of uses is appropriate and encouraged
within the Downtown. A wide raage of consumer oriented goods and
services are potripatible within this designation since the emphasis would
be on perFormance criteria which create an attractive pedes�ian oriented
shopping environment. However, uses which rely on direct access by
uehicles or involve heavy truck traffc (other than for merchandise
delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Unsightly outdoor storage
and similaz activities should be prohibited. Pernritted uses would consist
of retail trade, offices, personal services, indoor eating establisliments;
financial 'uistitntions, govemmental offices, and similaz uses. Multiple
family dweIliugs should be enaoivaged, particulaiazly witlun the upper
stories of buildings which include retail and commercial uses. Since
taverns can break up the conrinuity of people oriented areas, they should
be prohibited. Drive in windows should:not be permitted to maintain the
area's pedestrian environment. Parking standards within the downtown
should reflect the pedestrian orientaUon of the azea, but also consider
pazking's iinpact for economic development.
Page l41 I
Draft
2011Atxex�e�
— �889
C6apter 14_
Criteria for DesignaHon: This designation should apply only in
Downtown Aubum.
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation
should not be used other than for the Downtown area.
Appropriate Implementation: This designation can be implemented by
the following zoning districts:
1) The primary core of downtown should be implemented by the
Downtown Urban Center zone, wluch allows for a broad range of
uses with no residential density limitations.
2) Other commercial areas within the downtown may be implemented
by the G2 Central Business District.
Heavy Commercigl
Purpose: To pmvide automobile oriented commercial areas to meet both
the local and regional need.for such services.
Description: This category is intended to accommodate uses which are
oriented to automobiles either as the mode or target of prodiding the
commercial service. The category would also accommodate a wide range
of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or heavy vehicular
movement.
Compatible Uses: A wide variety of commercial services oriented to
automobiles aze appropriate within this category. Tlvs includes
automobile sales and service, drive in restaurant or other drive in
commercial business, convenience stores, eta Since these uses aze also
compatible with heavier commercial uses, lumber yards, sma1T scale
wazehousing, contractor yazds and similar heavy commercial uses are
appropriate in this designation.
Criteria for Designarion: This designation should only be applied tb
areas which aze higlily accessible to automobiles along major arterials.
Generally this category would chazacterize commercial strips. This zone
is appropriate for the intersections of heavily traveled arterials, even if
adjacent sites aze best suited for another commercial designation.
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Areas which
conflict with single family residential azeas or azeas more suited for other
Page 1412
Draft
2011Atnended-
2A94
Comp.Plau '
Map
uses. Whenever possible this category should be separated from all uses
by extensive buffering.
Appropriate Implementation: This category is implemented by the C-3
Heavy Commercial District.
Neigh6orhood Commercial
Purpose: To provide accessible commeicial services &equently needed in
residential . azeas without creating land use conflicts between those
commercial uses and the residential azeas they serve.
Description: Residentia] azeas require commercial services almost on.a
daily basis. Snch services, while necessary, can also conflict with the
quality of residential areas. Consequently, commercial areas need to be
reserved that aze either carefblly restricted (if located within residential'
areas) or are accessible to, but buffered from, residential azeas.
Compatible Uses: In restricted azeas (those within neighborhoods), uses
must be cazefully controlled both in the kind of uses permitted and in
terms of design and other performance criteria. A much less restricted
type of neighborhood commercial use can be designated near intersections
of a major arterial and a residential arterial. A much wider range of
commercial activities are appmpriate in such an area, including grocery
stores, convenience stores, service stations, hardware stores, small
restaurants and drinking establishments. However, activifles (such as
outdoor storage) which can altec the chacacter of these areas into heavier
commercial areas should only be permitted on a conditional basis in order
to conuol potenrial adverse impacts.
Criteria for Designation: In all cases, neighborhood commercial azeas
should be at the intersections of majoi streeu. In the case of restricted
types, such streets may be residential arterials, while in the case of the less
restricted type at least one of the streeu should be a major arterial.
Adequate buffering should be planned in the process of designating any
new areas as neighborhood commercial.
Considerations Agaiust Applying ttiis Designation:. This designation
should be avoided whenever it is not possible to adequately buffer the
commercial uses from adjacent residential uses.
Appropriate,Implementation: This category is implemented by the C-N
Neighborhood Commercial District.
Page 14-13
Draft
2011,4�ex�ed
— �999
Chapterl4
O�ce-Residential
Purpose: To reserve azeas to accommodate professional offices far
expanding medical and business services; while providing a transition
between residential uses and more intensive uses and activities.
Description: This category is a restricted commercial designation
reserved only for certain types of activities. As a gowing medical center,
areas need to be reserved to accommodate growth in this sector, whicfi is
largely expressed in the form of professional offices. This category also
assures space to accommodate the rapi3 growth that is occurring in
business services and other service oriented activiries. Such uses also
provide a means for an appropriate transition for azeas originally
developed as a residential azea but now not appropriate.for that type of
use.
CompaHble Uses: To be fully effective as a transifion or a buffer, resi-
dential uses should be permitted on a conditional basis.
Criteria for Designation: As a h�ansition this designation can serve as an
appmpriate:buffer between heavily traveled arterials and established single
family areas. It would be particulazly appropriate in azeas where large
traffic volumes have affected an established residential area. It can be
applied where amenity values mirigate against heavy commercial uses
along major arterials. This designation. should also be used to
accommodate the expansion of inedical services in the area azound Auburn
Regional Medical Center.
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This zone is
intended for particular applications as described. It generally should not
be applied on a lazge scale basis.
Apprnpriate Implementation: This category is implemented by two
zones:
1) RO - Residential Office District which is intended to primarily
accommodate business and professional offices where they aze.
' compatible with residential uses.
2) RO-H Residential Office-Hospital District is to be used exclusively
for the area azound Auburn Regional Medical Center.
Page 14-14
Draft
2011 tkrnen�e�
�AB9
Com��paPlan '
P
Industrial'Categories
Light Industrial
Purpose: To reserve quality industrial lands for activities that implement
the City's economic development oals and olicies. �
� Description: Tliis category is intended 10 accommodate a wide range;of
industrial and commercial uses. This designation is intended to provide a
location attractive for manufacturin�processinQ and assembling land use
activities that benefit from quality surroundings and approrniate
commercial retail uses that benefit from the location. access, �hysical
confi¢urarion, buildine tvnes of these properties. It is distinguished &om
heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant
activities shall take place inside buildings, and the prooessing or storage of
hazardous materials shall be stricdy controlled and pemutted only as an
incidental part of another use. The siting and design of industrial
buildings shall be of an "industrial or business park" character. Certain
residenrial uses may be permitted; especially in industrial azeas that have
been established to promote a business park environment that
complements envuonmental features, and/or if development standards aze
developed to promote compatibility between residential and other non-
residential land uses.
Compatible Uses: A wide range of industrial and heavy commercial uses
may be perciiitted, subject to performance standarcls. These uses include
ware�►e�isi�ig-er�-indoor manufacturine, nrocessing and assembline of
materials from previously prepated or iaw materials and ancillarv and
necessarv warehousin¢ and distribufion o£finisfied goods associated with
manufacturing and industrial uses. Certain residenual uses may be
permitted if development standards aze established to promote
compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses.
Outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria
addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with
adjacent uses and so that such stordge woutd not detract from the potential
use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be
e�ctensively screened.. In the Environmental Park District that implements
the "Light Industrial" plan map designation; outdoor storage will be
strictly iimited to promote compatibility with adjacent environmental land
uses. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous
materials as well as substantial emissions should not be,permitted in these
areas. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed �e�e� �
Page 14-IS
��
���tnet��er�
�999
C6apter 14
rl.,,� .. .,.1. . ...,..w ....�1.,... �1..... ,7,.�......� �...... F7... :..,7....�..:,.1 ..1.�,,..,,..�e.�..F�
fi�te-s�es to nrovide increased opportunities for sales tvc revenue.
The Burlington Northem Santa Fe Raikoad Aubura Yard located within
the Railroad Special Plan Area is considered a compatible use at its,cwrent
level of usage (as of August 14, 1996). It is not bound by the policies
concerning outside storage under the existing light industrial designation
as it was an existing use prior to the development of this policy: Should
BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to upgrade the yard to an
intermodal facility, the proposal will be subject to the essential public
facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter
5).
To ensure the Citv's long-term abiliri to invest in public infrastructure and
services remains viable, the Ciri must pursue implementation of policies
that incentivize the transition of current and future land uses. in its.
industrial zones away from distribution and wazehouse uses. The Citv
believes that manufacturing and industrial land uses should over rime
laruelv replace warehouse and distribution land uses currently existing in
the Ciri and that anv future wazehouse and distribution uses should 6e
ancillarv to and necessarv for the conduct of manufactixring and industrial
uses. Manufacturine and industrial uses aze more annronriate and
beneficial throu h higher and better use of the land, enhanced emplovriment
densities, increased pronerty tax revenues arid potential on-site sales tax
revenue generation for receipt of materials and other goods and services.
The establishment of regulations and incentives that create a basis for
increased commercial retail uses in the CiTy's industrial zoning districts
will provide ereater opportunitv for the generation of sales tax revenue in
the Citv. Increased sales tax revenue wi114ositively imvact the Citv's
continued abiliN to maintain and operate a strone public investment
proeram in infrastructure and services. Commercial retail uses wilb in hun
be attracted to and benefit from the location, acoess;physical confi�uTation
and buildine tmes of industrial zoned properties.
Criteria for Designation: This designation should be applied to a
majority of the Region Serving Area designated under this Plan: It is
particulazly appropriate for industrial land within high visibility corridors.
This category should sepazate heavy industrial areas from other uses.
Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Within the
Community Serving Area, this designation should only be applied to sites
' now developed as light industrial sites. Industrial sites along rail comdors
Page 14-16
Draft
201 I A�e�e�F
�899
i
—
Comp.P�n
Map
are generally more appropriate for heavier industrial uses, unless in high
visibility corridors.
Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the
Lieht Industrial (M-1;�, Environmerital Park (EP) or Business Park (BP) �
zone.
Heavy Industrial
Purpose: To provide a place for needed heavy industrial uses in areas
appropriatelysited for such uses.
Description: T'his designation allows the full range of industrial uses as
well as certaiu commercial uses. Certain residential uses may be permitted
if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between
residential:and other non-residential land uses.
Compatible Uses: While this zone should be reserved primarily for the
heavier forms of industrial activities, a wide range of industrial and
commercial activities may be permitted, along with residential uses with
appropriate compatibility protections.
Criteria for Desi�ation: The most appropriate area for this designation
is in the central part of the Region'Serving Area adjoining the rail lines.
This designarion is also appropriate in the southern portion of the azea
which is now developed in large scale industrial facilities (the Boeing and
the General,ServicesAdministration faciliries).
Considerations Against Applyiag this Designation: This desi�aarion
can only be applied in the Community Seiving Area to sites now
deyeloped in this character along A Street S.E. These azeas should not
abut commercial or residential areas; heavy industry should be buffered by
light industrial uses. It is not an appropriate desigiation for highly visible
areas.
Appropriate ImplementaHon: This designation is implemented by the
M-2 zone.
�
Planned Areas
Special Plan Areas(See Map 14.2)
Page 14-17
Draft
2011�e�
�999
Chapter 14
Purpose: To allow large areas within the City, under a single or a
coordinated management, to be developed as a planned unit. Tlvs
designation can also be used to provide flexibility when there is
uncertaintyregarding how an area may be most appropriately developed in
the future.
Description: This designation applies to specific areas identified as being
appropriate for mixed, urban level development on a planned basis., It is
intended that the future development of these areas will be guided by
individual "elements" or "sub-azea plans" of the Comprehensive Plan, to
be developed and adopted at a later date. T'he Plan elements should be
consistent with the following.
Compatible Uses: Uses and intensities within Special Planning Areas
shall be determined for each azea through individual planniag proces"ses.
Each individual planning process will result in the adopdon of a
Comprehensive Plan element (sub-area plan) for that particular Special
Planning Area. Each Plan element shall be consistent with the general
goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Development
of the individual Plan elements shall also be based upon the following
guidelines:
Academy Special Planning Area: The Auburn Adventist Academy Plan
was adopted by resolution No. 2254 in Novembe; 1991 and is considered
to be an element of the Comprehensive Plan. Tfie Plan applies to the area
within the property owned by the Academy and allow"s for a diversity of
uses on the site, primarily those related to the-mission and objecdves of tlie
Academy. As part of the adoption of the Plan, the area was zoned under
the I-Institutional Use District which permits uses such as schools,
daycare, churches, nursing homes, recreation and single family uses.
Auburn North Business Area Planning Area: The Auburn Nor[h Business
Area Plan was adopted by resolution No. 2283• in Mazch 1992 and is
considered to be an element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan covers
an approximately 200 acre area located directly noith of the Aubum
Central Business District. The Plan calls for development to be pedestrian
oriented with high density residential and light commercial components.
Downtown Special Planning Area: Downtown Auburn is a unique area in
the City which has received significant attention in the past and there will
be continued emphasis in the future. T'his Comprehensive Plan recognizes
Downtown as the business, govemmental and cultural focal point of .
Auburn with a renewed emphasis on providing housing in the Downtown.
Page t418
Draft
2011,4eaevt�e�-
�999
Comp. Plao
Map
Development of the Downtown should be consistent with the 2001
Auburn Downtown Plan.
Lakeland Hills Special Planning Area: The Lakeland Hills Plan was
adopted by resolution No. 1851 in April 1988 and is considered to be an
element of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan covers the approximately
458 acres of the Lakeland Hills development wluch falls within the King
Counry portion of the ciry. The Plan calls for a aiix of residential uses
including single and mulri-family housing as well as supporting
recreational, commeicial, public and quasi-public uses. The plan calls for
phasing of development in coordination with the provision of necessary
urban services.
Lakeland Hills South Special Planning Area: The Lakeland Hills South
Plan initially covered approximately 685 acres owned by The Lakeland
Company within Pierce County aad contained within the City of Aubum
potential annexation area (urban growth area). The Plan is intended to be
consistent witfi the conditions of approvaf of the Lakeland Hills South
PDD (Pierce CounTy Hearings Examiner Case No. Z15-90/UP9-70) as
amended.
The City of Auburn has accepted the Lakeland Hills South PUD as an
approved PUD. 1'his acceptance is impiemented in part through an
annexation and utilities agreement between the City and the developer of
Lakeland Hills South PUD. The Lakeland Hills South PUD is fwther
implemented by" the Ciry's zoning code, inclading ACC Chapter 18.76
entitled"Planned Unit Development District—Lakeland Hills South Special
Plan Area".
Residential development within the PUD is primarily single family and
moderate density dwellings with a wide range of lot sizes, includinglots
smaller than those typically allowed by the City's zoning ordinance for
non-PUD's. The maximum allowable number of residential units
provided for originally was 3,408 based upon an overall gross density of 5
units per acre. High density multifafnily units aze limited to one azea of
the PUD to approximately 669 units. Twenty acres are to be used for light .
commercial development and significant azea has been set aside as open
space. In 2007; the developer of Lakeland Hills South PUD was granted
an expansion to the Lakelanil Hills 3outhPUD to add an additional 4 acres
of commercial land, raising the total area of light commercial land to 24
acres. The development includes a developed 15-acre park, an
undeveloped 15-acre pazk, two 5-acre parks and a lineaz pazk along
Lakeland Hills Way. The locations of the pazks aze shown on the
Page�l4-19
Draft
201 1,4x�endec�
— �994
Chapter 14
wmprehensive plan map. Changing the 7ocation of any or all of tHe parks
does not consritute a comprehensive plan amendment provided that the
total park acreage does not change and the location is ageed upon bythe
City.
Within the Lakeland Hills South Special Plan azea only, the permitted
density ranges for the comprehensive plan designations are as follows:
Single Family Residential: 1-6 units per acre; Moderate Density
Residenrial: 2-14 units per acre; and High Density Residential: 12-19 anits
per acre. The development has occurred in phases in coordination with the
provision, of required uiban services and in 2008, the development is
nearing completion.
In 2004, the developer of Lakeland Hills South PUD requested_ an
expansion to the Lakeland Hills South PUD involving ,several parcels
totaling appmximately 7T acres — bringing the total PUD acreage to
� approximately 762 acres. The proposal designated these additional pazcels
as "Moderate Density Residential" (from "Single Family Residential")
with the objective of increasing the total number of units allowed in the
PUD from 3,408 to approa�imately 3,658. SubsequenUy, in 2005, it was
' determined and agreed that the total number of units within everi the
expanded boundaries of the PUD would be no greater than 3,408.
�
Lakeview Special Planning Area: The Lakeview Special Planning Area is
currendy the site of two independent sand ancl gravel mining operations.
Wlule mining activity continues in the eastern operation, indications in
1995 aze that the western operation has ceased. Activity in the westem
portion is now limited to a concrete batch plant and future site
reclamation. Following reclamation, the area should be developed as a
primarily single family residential neighborhood of low to moderate urban
density. A planned development would be particularly appropriate for this
approximately 235 acre site. The permitted development density of the
site will depend heavily upon the ability of the transportation system near
the site to handle the new uses. Consideration shall be given to the
environmental, recreational and amenity value of White Lake, as well as
the historical and cultural significance to the Muckleshoot Tribe, in the
development of the Lakeview Plan element. Permit applications haye
been accepted and aze currently being processed by the City with respect to
the mining activity on the eastem portion of the azea. The permit process
should continue, however, any pernut for continued mining in this portion
of ttie azea should be lunited to 10 yeazs to encowage completion of the
mining, and subsequent reclamation by the property owner in preparation
Page t4-20
D�ft
20I 1��
�A94
Comp.P�n
Map
for development. The Lakeview Plan element should be adopted prior to
the City's acceptance or processing of any other permit applicationsfor the
mining operation in the Lakeview Special Planning Area. The
environmental information and analysis included in the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for Lakeview(November 1980), shall be
considered in the development of the Lakeview Plan element. While
heavy commercial or industrial uses would not be appropriate as
permanent uses of this azea, conversion of the azea now zoned for heavy
industry to office commercial (or similaz) uses would be appropriate.
Rail Yard Special Planning Area: This approximately 150 acre Special
Planning .Aiea is located in the south-central portion of the City and
surrounded by SR-18 to the North, Ellingson Road to the South, C Street
SW to the west and A Street SE to the East. The Special Planning Area
should consider both sides of C Street and A Street. Consideration should
be given fo:
1. The needs of Burlington Northem.
2. Providing pedestrian, bicycle and vehiculaz access across the site to
connect the southeast and southwest sides of the city.
3. Providing a mare visually appealing "entry corridor" into the Ciry
from the south along A and C Streets.
4. Allowing for a mix of uses including single and multifamily
development and commercial and industrial uses where
appropriate.. �
Mt. Rainier Yista Speciql Planning Area.; This 145 acre Special Planning
Area is located south of Coal Creek Springs Watershed. Overall
development of the Mt. Rainier Vista s�-�at�e�-p}exelement shall be I
consistent with the following conditions:
1. Primary consideration in use and development of the property shall
be given to protection of Coal Creek Springs' water qualiry.
Development types, pattems and standards determined to pose a
substantial risk to the public water source shall not be allowed.
2. The maximum number of dwelling units
ap�rex3ti3ete}y-�4�wi11 be determined as par[ of any sub-area plan
rop cess: Dwelling units shall be located within portions of the
property where development poses the least risk of contamination
Page 14-21
Draft
��
_�984
Chapter 14
for Coal Creek Springs. Lands upon which any level of
development would have a high risk for contazninating the water
supply shall not be developed, bnt would be retained as open
space. The development pattern shall provide for a logical
transition between azeas designated .for rural uses and those
designated for single family residenrial use.
3. All dwelling units shall be served by municipal water and sanitary
sewer service, and urban mads. If 53rd Street S.E. is the major
access to serve the Special Planning Area, the developer will be
responsible for developing the street to urban standards, from the
properry owners' eastern property line that abuts 53rd Street, west
to the intersection of 53rd and Kersey Way.
4. Percolation type storm sewer disposal systems shall not be
pemutted. All surface water drainage shall be conveyed te
wnsistent .,,° e.....�, n:..,_ . ., n............. �_,.,.,. ,. ....,
�*�-�••~'�- �°�'�'�°° .with the Citv's current storm drainage
standards. Treatment of stormwater shall occur prior to its
discharge to any surFace water body, consistent with standard
public works or other requirements in general effect at the tune of
development.
5. The site shall be zoned temporarily, at one unit per four acres, unril
, the snb-azea plan is completed and.
the long-te=m urban zoning deternuned.
�
' 6. The Mt. Rainier Vista s�ecial klannine area boundary may be
modified through the development oFthe subarea nlan.
7. The Mt. Rainier Vista and Stuck River Road Special Plannin¢
Areas shall be coordinated subazea plans.
�
Stuck Rrver Road Special Planning Area: A portion of the Stuck River
Road Special Planning Area is currently the site of a lazge sand and gravel
mining operation. This area and other adjacent land comprising a total of
approximately �664 acres has been designated as a long term ;esource
area (mineral resource area), so development of the Special-Area Plan for
this azea should be a low priority as mining is expected to continue on this
site for as long as 30 yeazs. The land uses for the Stuck River Road
Special Planning Area iswill '
I . _ ._ • _ . . . be
determined throu�h the subazea planning process and the Ciry Council's
Page 1422
Draft
2011frrnende�
2999
Comp.Plao
Msp
adoption of the subazea plan. _Potential land uses applied throuah the
subazea planning_process 'could include single-family, multi-familx
residential. commercial, institurional.. and' recreational. Some lieht
industrial uses mav be appropriate for consideration and desi ation
throu�h the subazea plannin�process if the uses aze "industrial or business.
paik" in character: conducted entirely within an enclosed building, and
exhibit a hi�h de er e�of performance standards and aze non-nuisance in
nature and if apnropriatelv limited in extent and locaUOn. �-�-°�e
--- - .: . . . I
� , �
� A mix of housina tvpes ran�g, from sinele familv residential.to
multi-familv residential is aDpronriate for this planning azea The �
�e�et�fsubarea plan should be adopted taking into wnsideration the
period during which mining is expected and the intent of the ultimate
development of the area. An active pern►it eg�kesFiea has been seeeflEe�
processed by ttie City with respect to the mining
activity on a portion (approzimately �664 acres) of the mineral
extraction operation. The permit process should continue, however, any
permit for mining in the mineral resource azea should be granted for the
life of the resource, with reviews conducted periodically (ever five years)
to determine whether changes in the originally proposed mineral extracrion
operation have arisen and give rise to the need for additional or revised
permit conditions to address the new impacts (if any) of any such changes.
Any permit applications for additional acreage within the mineral resource
area shail be processed by the City. Development of this area should not
occur until adequate public facilities are available to support the
development consistent with City concurrency policy.
The City recognizes the potential for expanding 1he Stuck River Road
Special Planning Area to include additional land east of Kersey Way and
north of the Covington-Chehalis power line easement, and will consider a
proposal by all affected property owners. If the area is expanded, the
number of non-multiple family, non-manufactured home pazk dwellings
units may be incieased proportionate to the increase in acreage. Any such
proposal shall specifically apportion the types and quantities of
development to occar within each separate ownership.
Northeast Auburn Special Plan Area: This special plan azea covers the
property east of.Auburn Way North, west of the Green River, south of
277th (52nd Street) and north of approximately 37th Street NE. Several
property owners in this area aze interested in developing a master plan
which will address, among other things,the following issues:
Pege 1423
Draft
201 I A�e�e�
— �
C6ap�r14
1. I Street alignment and design
2. Storm drainage and other utility issues
3. Land use types and density
4. Finazicing necessary infrastructure imptovements
5. The Port of Seattle's wedand mitigation proposal
Criteria for Designation: Additional Special.Planning Areas may only
be designated through amendments of the Comprehensive Plan.
Appropriate Implementation; Plan elements establishing City policy
regazding the development of the Special Planning Areas shall be adopted.
by amendment of the Comprehensive Plan, or shall be adopted concurrent
with adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Special Planning Area elements
shall be implemented in the same manner as other elements of the
Comprehensive Plan; that is, under the City's, wning and subdivision
ordinances, development standards and public facilities programs.
Plan Map
Policies
In some cases the general policies established by this Plan need further
articulation or clarification due to particulaz geographic concerns
associated with specific areas. In other cases, the application ofthe Plan's
general policies may be inappropriate for a specific azea due to unique
circumstances, requiring that specific "exceptions" to these general
policies be established.. T'his section identifies these specific azeas and
establishes either supplemental policies or exceptions to the general
policy,as appropriate.
�
Urban Separators Urban separators aze azeas designated for low-density uses in the King
Counry Countywide Planning Policies. They are intended to be
"permanent low-density lands which protect adjacent resource lands,Rural
Areas; and environmentally sensitive areas and create open space coiridors
within and between Urban Areas which provide environmental, visual,
I recreational; and wildlife benefits." There aze two primary areas of urban
sepazators within the Lea Hill portion of the City of Au6um, which the
City is obligated to maintain (and not redesignate) until at least the year
2022, pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies and an annexation
agreement with King County. Urban separators aze deemed to be tiotti a
regional as well as local concem and no modifications to development
regulations goveming their use may be made without King County reyiew .
and concurrence. Therefore, the azeas designated as "iuban separator" on
Page 14-24
Draft
2011 A+nex6c�
2999
Comp.Plan
Map
the Comprehensive Land Use map, will be zoned for densities not to
exceed one dwelling unit per acre, with lot clusteriag being required if a
subdivision of land is proposed.
Infrastructure
Itelated
Policies
Pike Street
Area: North of 8th N.E., east of Harvey Road, and south of 22nd N.E.
Problem: This area is inadequately served by residential arterials. Further
intensification of use in this area vaould compound this problem.
Policy III.A. No iricrease in density or other development which would
increase u�c demand in this area should be approved.
�
8th Sheet N.E.
Area: 8th Strest N.E. between Aubum Way and M Street.
Problem: The:Comprehensive Plan Ivlap designates multiple family use,
as the ultimate use in accord with the Comprehensive Plan policies. While
8th Stre6t is designated as a major arterial, it is not currendy conshvcted to
tliat standar3'and is not able to support cdrrent tr�c demand adequately.
The Plan designation would greatly inorease t�affic volumes. Water
service is also not sufficient to support multiple family densities at the
present time.
Policy III:B. Implementation of the Plan designations should not occur
until 8th Street is,constructed to the adequate arterial standard and water
service is upgraded. Up zones should not be granted from current zoning
until these systemaare up�aded or guaranteed.
Auburn Way South, Auburn Black Diamond Road
Area: Aubum Way South in the viciniry of the Enumclaw Plateau; Area
between Auburn-Black Diamond Road and the Burlington Northern
Railroad.
Problem:. This Plan does not fully represent the intensity of uses that
could ultimately be supported in these azeas (in part due to the current
weakness of the City's infrastructure to support future growth). In spite of
this fact, the development intensity now planned will still need to be
Page 14-25
Draft
2011 Amee�ed
— �999
Chapter 14'
coordinated with the necessary infrastructure to support that growth.
Particulazly significant is the need to assess the a6ility of both Aubum
Way and Auburn-Black Diamond Road to support continued increases in
uaffic volumes.
Policy III.C. The area between Aubum-Black Diamond Road and the
Burlington Northem Railroad tracks is designated as Rura1 by the Plan
Map. The primary reason for this Rural designation is the current lack of
urban faciliries necessary to support urban development. Major
development proposals shall be carefully assessed under SEPA to ensure
that the development can be supported by the available facilities. Once
property owners aze able to demonstrate to ihe Ciry that they oan proyide
urban services (municipal water and sewer service, urban roads and,storm
water management) necessary to support the intensity of development
proposed within the entire azea, the Plan designation and zoning for tliis
azea should be changed to an urban residential or commercial
classification. The appropriate classification(s) shall be determined after a
review of the development proposal and the pettinent Comprehensive Plan
policies.
Economic Develo ent Strate Areas��aesNiea-Afeas
In 2005 the Citv of Auburn brouQht to¢ether a focus group of diverse
business and communiri interests that identified several economic
development azeas within.the Citv. The focus group's effort isreflected in
an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strate �i�es
and actions needed to affect necessa yry chan e� for specific strate�v areas
within the ciri. Identified in the 2005 Economic Develoument Strateeies
documents are six strateev areas alone with rivo addirional strategy areas.
� These economic development strategv azeas aze targeted for population
and emplovment growth to meet the Ciri's 20-veaz (2031J-erowth target.
Sub-area plans should be developed for these strategv areas. T'he.strategy
areas are as follows:
• Aubum WaV North Corridor
• Auburn Wav South Corridor
• ..Urban Center
• Auburn Environmental Park and Green Zone
e 15�' Street SW/C Street SW/West Vallev Highwav/Supermall
• A Street SE Corridor
• SE 312`h Street/124�' Avenue SE Corridor
e M Street SE between Auburn Way North and Auburn South
'. r c.z c._,,,..�.............::..� e..,.,.
Page 1426
Draft
201 Ife�n�e�
2999
� i � .
� ,
_ •
� . . . .. Y. . • . . . . . . . .. . . . . ' . " _. ._ .. - . .
. .' . _. � _ � '_ . ' . � . . . . .
. . . _ � _ __ . . � . . . .
_ _ ._� . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . ..�� . . .
]
� _ . �I ■ . _ . . _ .. . _ _ • _ _ . . __ .. .. . . ' . . . . ' . . . . .
' � ". " " " ! " ' " " � ' " _ _ "" " " ' " " ' " . . _ . .. . . .
" " ' " ' " ' ' " .... "� . . .. ' 9 . . " " . � " "
. � .. _. . ' ' . . . _ . � ' _ - . ' ' __. ' . .__ __ __ � . . _�
.. _. . � . . . . .. ' . . . . _ . . . .. . . " . _. " . _ . _ . � . _.
� .. . . .. Y. . " . . � . . . _ . _ ' . _ . . . _ . � . . .
.� . . . . .. _ . _ . . .� .. .. . . . . • . "_ . ._ .
• � . � Y. _ � . ' �� . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .
. .. . • . . . •. . . . . - . . .. . _ . _ . � . . . . . . . _� . _
• . .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . \ � .. � .. ..
1 .
�
���
I : 1 •
1 . . . .. ♦ � ... . � � . . • • - • � • � • . .
. . . ... _ . . . . Y.- . .
. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ' .
� � . � . � . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
• . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
. _ _ � • . . . . . •
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .
� . . \ . . . . . .
. . _ .. . �
� . . . .. . . . . .
. . � . . . . . . . . . . .. . . _ � _ _ _ _ _ _ • :
_ . . . . . Y. . .
� .
�
��•
Corop.Plan
Map
..i.... ....i.,ae .we ..ie.,.,,..«.,,:,._ ,.r�-.....ra,. ,.,.�.....:..,. � ..
� ""-Wm-i--� ev�i.sis'��
Problems Related
to Existing Uses
WestAuburn
Area: South of West Main between the rail lines.
Probtem: Tlus is an older part of town developed in a pattem of
commercial uses along Main Street and residential uses south to Highway
18. This area is in the Region Serding Area as designated in this Plan.
The homes in this area aze typically older singles� family homes that �
have been converted to mulri-family housing. Some may have historic
significance. Preservation and restbration of the exisring housing in this
azea is a priority.
Policy III.J. This:azea should be planned for local serving multiple family
uses even though it is in the Region Serving Area.
AirportArea
Area: Industrially designated azea east of the Airport.
Probtem; This azea is highly suited for air related activities. Other
industrial type uses are now located here.
Policy III.J. The Ciry will encourage use in this azea to take advantage of
iu proximity to the Airport.
Lea Hill Area
Area: Area annexed on January I, 2008.
Problem; T7ie City has been concemed for yeazs that the rapid growth
taking place within the Lea Hill PAA will overwhelm ciry streets. Through
annexation the City can better manage the amount and type of growth in
this azea and help ensure that appropriate infrastructure to support
development is provided concurrent with that development.
, Page 1429
Draft
2011��ed
�899
C6apter 14_
The Apbum City Council envisions. retaining the predominantly single-
family character of the Lea Hill area rather than allow the trend of rapidly
_ . .
developing multi-family projects to continue.�The City's codes will help
I ensure that the neighborhood character, traffic, and environmentally
sensitive features are protected and/or managed.
Page I430
Draft
2011 A�nende�
�994
APPEI�TDIX B
1t�PORTS Al�TD STiTDIES
IntroduC6on The Comprehensive Plan presents the results of the comprehensive
planning process: A wide variety of other documents have been prepared
or utilized in the process. These other documents contaim the background
upon which the policy issues were assessed and the decisions made.
Consequently, while separately published, the "Comprehensive Plan"
should be considered the full body of this information. These documenu
aze all available for review in the Planning Department at Aubum City
Hall, and many oEthem are also available at the City Library. This section
identifies those documents.
Report to the Mayor on the Status o PlanninQ In Auburn. December-1982:
Upon taking office in 1982, Mayor Roegner requested the Planning
Department to develop a comprehensive review of the status of the City's
Planning Program and its Comprehensive Plan. This report was prepared
by the then new Planning Director and published "m December of 1982:
The pwpose of 'this report was to estabiish a common base of
understanding regarding the role that comprehensive planning should take
in the Ciry. It culminated in a recommendation that the planning program
be completely revised and a new Comprehensive Plan developed. While
the origirial recommendations have been modified subsequent to the
publishing of the 1982 report, it was.this report which began the policy
discussions leading to the development of this Comprehensive Plan.
,
Ponulation Trends. 1984: This report assessed the overall growth rate of
the comuiunity and how it is related to the growth rates in other areas. The.
report took a detailed look at the growth pattern in Aubnm over the last
decade and compazed this pattern to other areas in the Green River Valley,
King County, and the State. The report concluded that the growth in
Aubum is highly interrelated witfi tfie general growth that has occurred
over the decade in the Green River Valley. The consistency of this
interrelationship between the growth patterns of Auburn and the Crreen
Valley as a whole indicates that Auburn will continue to grow at a rate
Page B-1
Appendiz B '
similar to the overall growth rate of this part of the County. Growth ia
Au6um itself has been higher than in most other incorporated areas..
General Population Characteristics. 1980. January 1984.• This report
presented an overview of the population characteristics of the City of
Aubum. The report explored the population change in more detail than
the previous report, particularly in terms of change in sex, age; and racial
composition. The report also analyzed the composition of the Ciry's
families and the employment pattems of its residents as well as general
income levels. Finally the report zeroed in on the characterisrics of the.
City's low income population.
A e�up Analvsis. 1984: Tlus report provides perhaps the most detailed
exa**�;nation of some aspecu of the Ciry population of any of the Planning
reports. Three major demographic phenomena have strongly influenced
the sociological character of the community between 1981-1984; the post-
war baby boom, the subsequent baby-bust, and the growth of ttie elderly
popularion. This report extensively analyzes the implica6on of these
demographic phenomena on the community and compaze these
demographic patterns to other communities. This report noted that since
different age groups exert different demands for various types of goods
and services, these demographic pattems have a profound effect on the
problems and needs of the community. Since age gronps are also closely
related to housing and employinent needs, the relevance of this report to
many of the policies of the Plan is very significant.
Housiny Market Patterns and Characteristics-in Auburn, November 1984:
This report re viewed the housing supply of the City of Auburn and howit
has been changing. The purpose.of the report was to assess the nature of
the housing supply in order to assist in the development of appropriate
land use policy. The report was divided into three sections, the fiist of
which described the supply of various types of housing within the City
itself. The second section described how the broader Aubucn are9
community housing stock compazes to the housing stock of other
comtnunities. The third section described current construcdon pattems
and assessed the pmposed housing development plans .by the private
sector. This report provides the back ground that was used by the planning
process to develop residential policies in this document.
I
Page B-2
Reports and
Studies
Ponulation Forecasts, February 1985: Any comprehensive planning
process requires an understanding of where the community seems to be
headed in the future. This report forecasted the City's population based on
a variety of variables. The report is closely related to the Age Group
Analysis Report and the Housing Report identified above. The report
concluded that due to the. availability of buildable land and the
development pressure of the last decade there is considerable potential for
a very high rate of growth in the community. The report also noted that
the need for scfiool services, after a lull that is occurring at the present
tune, is expected tb resume; demand for preschool type services will
increase, the demand for retired age group services will increase; the
impact of substantiated growth in the young adult population that has
shaped much of the last decade, is lazgely over; the need for new entry
type jobs in the labor force should subside;'and the aging of the labor force
should result in very significant increases in family incomes and demand
for jobs appropria4e for that age group. An appendix to this report
assessed the inferrelationship between the growth forecasted in this report,
and the growth forecasted by the Puget Sound Council ofGovernments for
the region.
Existin¢ Land Use ManaQement Policv. December 1984: This is perhaps
the most significant of the reports for many of the policy issues addressed
by this Plan. It is particulazly important in terms of its implication on the
Comprehensive Plan Map itself. This report (which is closely related to
the_original report to the Mayor) contains a complete analysis of planning
in the City and policy issues wtucfi aze present in the cunent policy
framework. It addressed both very general policy issues as well as site
specificconflicts in City ordinances.
Land Use and Development Polic�of the Cit�ofAuburn. September 1983:
One of the basic problems identified in the original report to the Mayor
was the problem of the City's land use policy being contained in a wide
vaziety of documents. This report was originally prepazed in order to
assist in id_entifying those policies: As such, it provides a very useful step
in the planning process by combining all the key land use policy
statements'that have been adopted-by the City in one place. This report
merely compiles and restates that policy.
Downtown Report.-November--1984.• One of the most important concerns :
identified early in the planning process was the problems, needs and
potentials of the City's central business district. Due to this concern a
special committee was formed, both to address downtown needs
independently of the planning process, and to provide a source of advice to
the planning process regazding those needs. As a part of xhe Committee's
work, the Downtown Report was prepazed and issued. The report reviews .
Page B-3
Appendix B
and analyzes the downtown of the Ciry in order to provide a cominon
understanding of downtown issues in developing the Comprehensive Plan.
The report reviews types of concerns that generally present themselves in
downtown planning and applies those concerns io the current condition
and viability of Auburn's downtown. Related to this report is a rep.ort
which implements some of the Committee's proposals for downtown in the
form of off-street pazking facilities.
Economic Analvsis. December of 1985: This report presents an economic
base study of the City. This base study is prepared from several different
perspectives. First the report assesses how the people who live ui Auburn
gain their livelihood. Second,the report describes the type of erimployment
that is available in the City. Tliird, the report describes the struchue of the
Ciry's business communiry as measured by taxable sales activity. Finally
the report compares the structure of the City's employment base to the
employment shucture of the surrounding azea. On the basis of this
analysis a projectibn of future economic activity can be gained.
Land Use Analvsis. December 1985: This report analyzes the current use
of tHe land in the City and how it is changing. It also describes and
assessas change in various regulatory actions related to land use such as
rezones and platting.
Neighbarhoods Meeting Program.. AuQUSt 1985: This report documents
and summarizes the citizen input that was received by the City durnig its
eight neighborhood meetings. The first part of the report provides an
overview of the neighborhood meetings taken as a,whole, identifying and
discussing those issues that appeazed to ,be most important to meeting •
participants. The following sections then provide a record of each meeting
including a paraphrased listing of quesrions and comments offered 6y the
participants.
KidsPlan: Julv 1985: This report provides the results of the KidsPlan
ptogram which was conducted during the spring of 1985., A sutvey form
was distributed to school children throughout Auburn in both public and
_
private elementary schools. Responses were received from375 children;or
approxunately 10% of all children attending school within the City of
Auburn. The survey was intended to obtain information regarding the
types of places and aspects of the community that aze important to
children.
, Issues Papers, from August to December of 1985: The Planning
Commission and Planning Departrnent prepared a series of issue papers
which identified the various issues which needed fo be addressed by tfie
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. These issue papers serve as the basis
Page B-4
Reports and
Studies
for the Comprehensive Plan and are derived from the studies and public
participation process described above. Each issue paper includes an
identification of altemati4e respbnses to the particular issue, a description
of the issue, the views of the neighborhood groups, the view of tlie
development communiry, the results of the studies as they relate to tlie
issue, a general recommendation by the Planning staff, and recommended
goals, objectives and policies. This report contains all twenty-six of those
issue papers.
Environmental Constraints and On»ortunities. Januarv I985: This report
seeks to develop an understanding of the environmental conditions
exisring in the City. The report descrilies and assesses the environmental
conditions'related to climate, air quality, geology and soils, hydrology, and
wildlife habitat The report notes tlie consttaints that are imposed by
environmental conditions on development within the City. It refers to a
series of maps that have been used in the planning process.
OTHER
REPORTS: All the reports described above were prepazed by the Planning Deparhnent
for the Comprehensive Plan itself. In addition to these studies there aze a
series of other reports that haue been prepazed by or for the City in receat
yeazs, independenY of the comprehensive planning process. These reports
nonetheless provided substantial informatibn used in the development of
this plan.
1982 Comprehensive.Tra�c Plan. City of Auburn. Julu 1982.• This report
replaced the original Uraffic element which was adopted as part of the 1969
Comprehensive Plan. As the �c element of the Plan, it describes both
the present and anticipated future traffcproblems that will be confronting
the community, the goals to be achieved in the management of traffic and
a recommended traffic plan. It also includes policies and
recommendations related to fmancing the traffic improvements. This
document was adopted formally as an element to the Ciry's
Comprehensive Plan.
Auburn Park and Recreation Plan. 1981: This plan assesses the park and
recreation needs of the community and presenu a recommended capital
impmvement:program to develop those facilities. 1'he plan also includes
standards for pazks and recreation and recommends methods of financing
facilities. The docuinent also includes recommendations relating to open
space. This. plan was formally adopted as an element of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Seweraee Plan. 1982: This plan identifies sanitary
seweiage needs of the community and recommends steps to meet those
needs. It contains standards for service which should be applied to new
Page B-5
Appendiz B
development. This document is based upon and is considered to be an
implementing tool for the 1969 Comprehensive Plan.
Comprehensive Water Svstem Plan. June 1983: Tlus plan identifie"s the
water service needs of the community and recommends facilities and
programs to meet those needs. It also contains standards for water serdice
that should be applied to new development. This document is based upon
the 1969 Comprehensive Plan and is considered to be an implementing
tool for that plan.
Communitv Development Block Grant Plan. December 1984: This is an
annual plan developed to guide the administration of the City's Block
Grant Program. The Plan identifies important communiry needs and seeks
to develop a program to address those needs. 1'he plan also identifies and
describes low income neighborhoods within the Ciry.
Auburn Wav South Sanitarv Sewer Studv: This report analyzed the
capacity of sewer service in southwest Aubum and identified significant
deficiencies in that service.
Housing Assistance Plan. October /984: This plan is adopted in order to
guide any decisions related to the development of assisted housing in the
City. It specifically identifies high priority azeas for such development.
The plan also presents a comprehensive analysis of housing condidons in
the,City and cost of housing for various income groups.
Fire Services Studv. 1982: Tlus report analyzed fire services needs in the
coaimtiniry and'laid out a plan of action to meet those needs: Of particulaz
importance, this report idenrified standards for fire station location and
needs.
Greenhouse Gas Inventorv for the CiN of Auburn. WashinQton: AuQUSt
2010: This report documents the results of the first greentiouse gas
emissions inventories conducted for the City of Auburn's municipal
operadons and the broader Auburn community. The inventories were
conducted to provide the City with information to better understand the
nature 'and sources of municipal and community greenhouse gas
emissions, and to develop a forecast for projected levels of greenhouse gas
emissions in future years. The inventory report provides a discussion
framework for setting greenhouse gas emission reduction targets,
recommendations for strategies to achieve the targeted emission
reductions, and base year emission levels for measuring progress ,in
meeting the City's greenhouse gas emission reduction objectives. The
report indicates that the City's municipal operations generated
appmximately 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (mtCO2e)
Page B-6
Reports and
Studies
and the broader Auburn community generated just over 840,000 mtCO2e
in base yeaz 2008. The report projects that municipal and community
greenhouse gas emission levels will increase approximately 10 percent
over base year levels:by 2015 and approximately 40 percent over base year
levels by 2030 unless Auburn takes significant actions to reduce its
emissions.
Cilv ofAuburn Urban Core Task Force Final Draft Report. November
2010: In Januarv of 2010, the Mavor appointed a citizen based Auburn
Downtown/Ciri Vision Task Force that brought together a broad based set
of interests. communities and exneriences. The Task Force was chazged
with developing ideas for continued eiowth of the downtown area.
includine a broacl.vision for the ciri with the consideration for a proiected
grow[h of up to 50,000 more residents in the city center bv 2050 and
bevond.Ance:these ideas were develo�ed, they would be presented xo the
Aubum Citv Council`to consider and potentially take action on at a future
date. With the city's ereat economic opportunity, historic chazacter and
cultural venues:planned �rowth must occur with excellent housing choices
and amenities that would bring more peonle. more often to downtown
Auburn, and support a denser, walkable and more attractive downtown
core. In order to anticipate this growth. this renort communicates the work
of a �p of dedicated citizens of Auburn who envisioned a sustainable
future for the citv focused on growth,prosperiri and iivabiliri. Six
Guidine.Principles form the final recommendationsofthe UCTE, each
with Sub Principles to reinforce the ideas and suggest specific initiatives to
reach the:Guiding Principle �oals. The first section discusses the formation
and the mission ofthe.UCTF and the mission statement develonment. The
second section gets into specific ideas that sunnort the overall mission in
the framework of Six Guidin�Principles. Each of these principles
represents a separate overall character and direction for the city that the
UCTF feels is critical to meet the goals of the mission statement and a
quality of life in Aubum bv 2050. While some of the Guiding Principles
are nnique, others ov8rlap and cross into manv cateeories to reinforce their
value: images and maps to support the ideas that illustrate exercises and
chazette bythe grou�are placed alon¢side tfie nrincioles for more clariri.
The final�art of this report is a series of appendices that provide
additional information including meetin�agendas, photographs,
presentations shown at meetings, and supporting documents that illustrate
either orevious studies that need revisiting or examnles of su�estions
outlined in the Guiding Principles.
Auburn Bicvcle Task Force PowerPoint Renort, November 2010.• In
Mazch 2010, the Mavor convened the Ciri of Aubum Bicycle Task Force
to further develon and refine the Citv's eoals and policies for its bicvcle
transportarion svstem. The Task Force was comnrised of a broad cross
Page B-7
A endi:B
section of communitv members plus representatives from Aubum School
District, Green River Communifv College and the Cascade Bicvc]e Club,
that were requested to develop recommendarions on bicycle facilities:.
issues.and opporhxniries centered on the followine three nrincinles:.
Connections, Recreational Onoortunities and Economic Development.
The Task Force met a total of 14 times includine a three-hour communitv
tour and a joint meetin�with Auburn Tourism Board and Auburn
Downtown Association. The Committee worked on a variety of issues
including mapping of bicycle facilities and identification of bicvcle related
proiecfs and priorities. On November 29,201Q xhe Task Eorce's
recommendations were presented at an Auburn City Council Committee of
the Whole meetina. The Task Force presented 6oth short-term
recommendations consistinp of recommendations for pilot prosram road
mazkings, si�naee, policv considerations,trail improvements and long
ierm recommendations consisting of construcrion of a bicvcle/pedestrian
bridge, intersection irriprovements, pilot oroetam of further road markings,
a crossin�wamin�ystein, development of a bike map and promotion of
bicvcle relafed events:
ENVIRONMENTAL
REPORTS In addition to studies and plans identified above, there have been a series
of environmental reports that were used in the development of various
maps and reports identified above. Most of these reports are referenced in
the Environmental Constraints and Opportunities report described' above.
In recent years several environmental impact.statements were prepared and
were available during the planning process as further background
information. These impact statements included:
1. Lakeland Hills
2. Auburn Downs
3. Auburn 400
4. Mountain View Terrace
5. Balgray Holdings
6. Crreen Meadows
7. Academy Area Water System Impmvements
8. Surface Mining Operations (Lakeview)
Page B-8
Reports and
Studies
9. London Squa;e
10. Mount Rainier Vista
11. Skyview
12. Proposed Cnoundwater Withdrawals(Wells 3 and 4)
13. Stuck River Estates
14. Auburn Way South Sanitary Sewer System.
15. Ciry of Auburn. Final Environmental Impact Statement - Citv of
Aulium Comprehensive Plan: Staff Draft and Recommendations:
May 1986.
16. City of Aubum. Final Determination of Non-Significance. -
Downtown Design Study. April 1990.
17. City of Aubum. Final Detemiinarion of Non-Significance -
Comprehensive Storm Draina�e Plan. May 1990.
18. City of Auburn. Final Determination of Non-Sie�ificance -
Comprehensive Plan Amendments on Citv Exnansion and Urban
Growth. July 1991.
19. City of Aubnm. Final Environmental Impact Statement: Aubiim
North CBD Analvsis. November 1991.
20. City of Auburn. Final Determination of Non-Si�nificance -
Comprehensive Plan Amendments on Sensitive and Critical
Lands. January 1992.
Finally, a series of reports prepazed by other agencies were used to assist
in analyzing eaVironniental conditions:.
1. King Counry, Sensitive Areas Map Folio, March, 1980.
2. Dames&Moore, Report of Hvdrogeologic Investi�ation. Coal
Creek and West Hill Sprin�3vstems, 1976.
3. Pool Engineering,Ground Water Supplv Study, September 1982.
4. U.S.Army Corps of Engineers, Inventory of Wetlands Crreen-
Duwamish River Vallev,August, 1981.
Page BA
Ap endix B
5. U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Soil Survey, King County Area;
November 1973.
6. King County, Kine Counri Wetlands Inventorv,January 1983.
7. Crreen River Basin Program, Mill Creek Basin Profile (n.ii.).
8. King County, A River of Green, (n.d.).
9. State of Washington Departrnent of Natural Resources, Draft
Aquatic Land ManagementPlan for the Duwamish/Green River,
December 1981.
10. King County, SavinQ Farmlands and Open Suace, July 1979.
11. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Wetlands Inventorv.Auburn,
Wash., July 1973.
12. King County Pazks, Planning and Resources Department. Final
Environmental Impact Statement: Soos Creek Communitv Plan
U�date. December 1991.
13. King County Parks, Planning and Resources Department, Final .
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement: Countvwide
Plannin� Policies Proposed Amendments. May. 1994.
14. King County Parks, Planning and Resources Department.
Supplemental Enviionmental Impact Statement: King Countv
Comprehensive Plan. July 1994.
15. Pierce County, Department of Planniiig and Land Services,
Proposed Lakeland Hills South Mining and Reclamarion Plan and .
Planned Communiri Develonment: Final Envuonmental Impact
Statement. July 21; 1992.
16. Pierce County, Department of Planning and Land Serdices.
Comprehensive Plan for Pierce Countv, Washington: Final EIS.
September 20, 1993.
17. Pierce County, Department of Planning and Land Services.
Final Supplemental EIS for the Comprehensive Plaa for Pierce
Counry. Washin t�on June 1994.
Page B-10
Reports and
Studies
18. Puget ,Sound Council of Governments. Final Environmental
Imnact Statement - Vision 2020: Growth Strateg,y and
Transportation Plan for the Cen�al Puget Sound Re '�on
Septem6e`r 1990.
Page B-11