HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-04-2012
Public Works Committee
September 4, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes*
B. Right-of-Way Permit No. 12-21* (Mund)
Approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-21 for Home Plate Pub Outdoor Seating
Area
C. Right-of-Way Permit No. 12-26* (Mund)
Approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-26 for Auburn Parks, Arts and
Recreation Veterans Day Parade
III.RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4853* (Repp)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to Execute an Agreement Between the City of Auburn and
the U.S. Geological Survey for Water Resources Investigation
B. Resolution No. 4854* (Dowdy)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Mayor and City Clerk to Amend the Memorandum of Agreement with Pierce
County for the Purpose of Providing Road Services
IV.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Bad Debt Write-Off* (Coleman)
B. Resolution No. 4851* (Snyder)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn Authorizing the Mayor to
Execute an Agreement with the Lowest Responsible Bidder for Public Works
Contract No. 12-18 Regarding the City Hall Phase 1 Remodel Project (Projects
CP1009/CP0716)
C. Resolution No. 4838* (Para)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Setting the
Time and Date for a Public Hearing Before the City Council on the 2013-2018
Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
Page 1 of 168
D. Resolution No. 4839* (Dowdy/Para)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Approving the
2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program of the City of Auburn Pursuant to
R.C.W. Chapter 35.77 of the Laws of the State of Washington
E. Capital Project Status Report* (Gaub)
F. Action Tracking Matrix* (Dowdy)
V.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes
Date:
August 29, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
August 20, 2012 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the August 20, 2012 Public Works
Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 168
Public Works Committee
August 20, 2012 - 3:30 PM
Annex Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in
Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One
East Main Street, Auburn, Washington, 98002.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wagner, Vice-Chair Bill Peloza, and Member Osborne were
present. Also present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete Lewis,
Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, City Engineer/Assistant Director
Dennis Selle, Utilities Engineer Dan Repp, Transportation Manager
Pablo Para, Transportation Planner Joe Welsh, Project Engineer
Robert Lee, Street Systems Engineer Seth Wickstrom, Water Utility
Engineer Cynthia Lamothe, Project Engineer Ryan Vondrak, citizen
Scot Pondelick, and Public Works Office Department Secretary
Jennifer Cusmir.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There was one agenda modification, Resolution Item A, Resolution
No. 4850.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve the minutes of the August 6, 2012
Public Works Committee Meeting.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
B. Right-of-Way Permit No. 12-25 (Welsh)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-25 for
The Auburn Downtown Association Wine and Music Festival.
Page 1 of 9
CA.A Page 4 of 168
Transportation Planner Welsh explained that last year’s Wine and
Music Festival was held east of Division Street and West of Auburn
Way N and this year the applicant is proposing to hold the event
centered around the City Hall Plaza.
Member Osborne asked who is the head of The Auburn Downtown
Association (TADA). Mayor Lewis answered the president of TADA,
Allison Vandenberg form WA Federal Savings is currently heading the
organization.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
C. Public Works Project No. CP0915 (Lee)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council grant permission to
advertise for bids for Project No. CP0915, Well 1 Transmission Line.
Chairman Wagner asked if the transmission line intersects with the M
Street Underpass. Project Engineer Lee answered that the
transmission line starts just south of the M Street Underpass Project.
Member Osborne asked about the results of consultant work done at
Well 1 in prior years. Utilities Engineer Repp responded that the
consultant’s effort was to complete a hydrogeologic assessment of
Well 1. The consultant examined the well’s capacity and physical
condition to help determine if a new well needed to be built of if the
existing well house and motor control for Well 1 could be
reconstructed.
There was also a pump test conducted to look at aquifer production
rates and overall ability of the well facility to produce water. Utilities
Engineer Repp stated results from the testing were positive. The
underground portion of Well 1 is in reasonable physical condition
considering the age of the facility and the well does not need to be
replaced.
Utilities Engineer Repp stated that the well is functioning at full
capacity, in response to a question asked by Member Osborne.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
D. Public Works Project No. CP1109 (Lee)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council approve Change
Order No. 3 in the amount of $31,134.11 to Contract No. 11-15 for
Page 2 of 9
CA.A Page 5 of 168
Project No. CP1109, 2011 Storm Pipeline Repair and Replacement –
Phase.
There were no questions from the Committee.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
E. Public Works Project No. CP1216 (Wickstrom)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council grant permission to
award Contract No. 12-17 to Doolittle Construction LLC on Their Low
Bid of $137,770.00 for Project No. CP1216, 2012 Arterial and
Collector Crackseal Project.
Member Osborne asked if the areas that receive crackseal and other
pavement treatments will be re-striped. Street Systems Engineer
Wickstrom answered that the contractor will restripe and remark the
pavement.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
F. Public Works Project No. CP1206 (Wickstrom)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council approve Change
Order No. 1 to Contract No. 12-10 for Project No. CP1206, 2012
Pavement Parching, Chipseal and Overlay Project.
Chairman Wagner stated that he is pleased that double chipseal
treatment is being applied to 105th Place SE/107th Place SE/SE 320th
Street.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 3-0.
III. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4850* (Repp/Lamothe)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Construction Loan Agreement
Between the City of Auburn and the Washington State Public Works
Trust Fund Board Relating to the Well 1 Improvements Project
(CP0915)
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember
Osborne seconded to recommend City Council adopt Resolution No.
4850. The Committee and staff discussed the yearly payment amount
for the 20 year, $3,325,000.00 loan.
Page 3 of 9
CA.A Page 6 of 168
Director Dowdy explained that the loan was made on a previous
project estimate so the current project estimate exceeds the amount of
the loan.
Member Osborne asked if the project construction will be completed
on schedule or ahead of schedule. Water Utility Engineer Lamothe
stated it looks likely that the project will be completed ahead schedule
and explained that if construction is complete within four years the City
will receive a .25% reduction in interest and if the project is completed
within three years there will be up to .5% reduction.
The Committee and staff discussed the project construction schedule.
Motion Carried Unanimously. 0-0.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. 2013-2018 Transporation Improvement Program Annual Update
(Para)
Chairman Wagner asked if anything was added to the Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP). Transportation Manager Para stated that
the Finance Department made a minor change to a project’s funding
source but the funding amount was not changed.
Chairman Wagner asked that the years be included in the header of
the document. T
Transportation Manager Para stated the project being removed from
the TIP are either completed or are being transferred to the
Comprehensive Transportation Plan, in response to a question asked
by Vice-Chair Peloza.
Transportation Manager Para stated that the Public Hearing for the
TIP is scheduled for September 4, 2012 and the TIP will be sent to
Council for approval on September 17, 2012.
Chairman Wagner asked about the due date for adoption of the
TIP. Transportation Manager Para stated that the State asks for the
TIP by July and next year’s update should be completed before July.
B. Residential Street Lighting (Dowdy)
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle explained that the estimated
number of street lights represented on the Street Light Data Sheet are
constantly changing base on City and developer projects, i.e. adding
new PSE lights, converting PSE lights to City lights, adding new City
lights, etc.
Page 4 of 9
CA.A Page 7 of 168
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle pointed the estimated annual
street light cost of power between metered and unmetered systems
and the City’s lighting standards, also included on the Street Light
Data Sheet. Selle stated that the goal with both the City light system
and PSE lights is to try to light each intersection and a light at mid-
block, on a typical residential street.
The Committee and staff reviewed the Residential Street Light Policy
Issues.
Chairman Wagner asked what determines when PSE will charge the
City to install lights on existing poles and when PSE will not
charge. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle answered that PSE
when has existing wooden poles in the area with power available they
will install a light and the only charge to the City is ongoing payment of
the power bill. If there is no pole, wire, or power with the correct
transformer then PSE would charge the City for installation. Selle
stated if the pole is “light ready” and there is a request for a light and
the location meets the City’s criteria, the City will request that PSE
install a light. Chairman Wagner asked for additional information on
the cost for installation when a “power ready pole” is not available.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated the approximate cost of a
typical span of wire is $800.00 and to add a transformer is
approximately $3,000.00. If a pole needs to be installed, the change
would be approximately $1,500.00.
Mayor Lewis and Committee discussed the possible policy for
requests for adding lights to new PSE poles. Mayor Lewis outlined two
possible options either present each request to the Committee and
then determine a funding source or ask Council to find an available
funding source for street lighting and they present each request to the
Committee for approval. The Mayor and Committee discussed the
estimated number of requests the City will receive if the Council
decides to change the current policy.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle responded to questions asked
by Vice-Chair Peloza regarding how requests for particular
neighborhoods are processed by staff.
Chairman Wagner asked that a notation be made that there is very
little staff time/cost to determine whether lights can be installed on an
existing pole or not.
Chairman Wagner asked if PSE ever participates in the formation of
Local Improvement Districts (LIDs). Assistant Director/City Engineer
Selle and Mayor Lewis answered that PSE does not participate in
Page 5 of 9
CA.A Page 8 of 168
public system improvements such as LIDs.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated that the City standard for
poles is aluminum, in response to a question asked by Vice-Chair
Peloza.
The Committee and staff discussed the estimated annual street light
power costs and the cost effectiveness of adding meters to all light
poles. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated that staff looks for
cost effective opportunities to install metered systems such as a new
development or certain capital projects. Assistant Director/City
Engineer Selle stated it would be very expensive to meter all of the
existing systems.
Member Osborne and Chairman Wagner asked if the City is allowed to
negotiate costs with PSE. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated
that PSE has schedules that are approved by the Utilities and
Transportation Commission and apply to the entire PSE service area
within the State.
Director Dowdy spoke about the level of service provided by PSE,
which is quite good and comparable to the level of service provided by
the City.
The Committee and staff discussed whether or not the lighting
standards need to be reviewed following the increase in the usage of
LED lighting.
The Committee supports the current policies regarding residential
street lights as presented by staff.
Director Dowdy stated that there are still light systems in the recently
annexed areas of Auburn that are privately maintained by Home
Owners’ Associations because they still have the PSE concrete light
poles. Director Dowdy explained that if in the future if the City were to
allow the concrete light poles, the City could go back out and offer to
take over the systems. Director Dowdy said staff is not recommending
changing the City standards.
The Committee and staff reviewed maps which showed the existing
street light coverage and unlighted residential areas and the existing
City, PSE and private street lights.
Mayor Lewis asked for a map showing where only all the poles without
lights are located be prepared for the next Public Works Committee
Meeting.
Page 6 of 9
CA.A Page 9 of 168
The Committee asked staff to evaluate the feasibility of installing street
lights on 102nd Place SE.
The Committee and staff reviewed the cost of lights per block
figure. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle explained the cost is
calculated per 3 light poles.
The Committee asked for the addition of a line on the matrix outlining
the cost of installing a light on an existing PSE pole which is not ready
to support a light.
C. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub)
Mayor Lewis notified the Committee that at this time there is no way to
install a camera at the M Street Underpass project site that would
allow people to view the construction. There is no infrastructure in the
area to support the camera. Director Dowdy stated staff is still
investigating the possibility of wireless options.
Item 8 – CP1116 – Downtown Pedestrian Lighting
Replacement: Project Engineer Vondrak stated that the lights in the
Safeway parking lot area have not been installed because staff was
waiting to make sure there were enough funds available, in response
to a question asked by Chairman Wagner. The funds are available and
the lights are backorder at this time.
Director Dowdy reported that the water purchase agreement with the
City of Tacoma is complete, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner.
Item 13 – C201A - M Street SE Underpass Project: Project Engineer
Vondrak stated the new storm drainage line is connecting to the M
Street Underpass project at 8th Street SE and verified that the project
did not fund any storm line beyond 8th Street SE, in response to a
question asked by Chairman Wagner.
Item 15 – EM0902 – Temporary Flood Control Barrier Removal: Vice-
Chair Peloza asked how the work is proceeding. Director Dowdy
stated that work is going very well and the problems encountered are
being addressed. Director Dowdy also reported that King County has
also provided good support.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated there is a disposal
location coordinated by King County, for sandbags that were being
used by citizens, in response to a question asked by Member
Osborne. Director Dowdy stated that people are also recycling the
sand on their properties.
Page 7 of 9
CA.A Page 10 of 168
Item 29 – CP1024 – AWS and M Street SE Intersection
Improvements: Chairman Wagner asked why the project is not being
advertised for bids until August 2013. Transportation Manager Para
stated that the project is currently in design and there will be some
Right-of-Way acquisition needed. Also, the project is not fully funded
but staff is applying for a Transportation Improvement Board grant for
the project.
Item A – CP1210 - Auburn Valley Humane Society Site
Improvements: Chairman Wagner asked if drivers will have the ability
to make a u-turn at Lakeland Hills Way SE and enter the parking lot of
the facilities, since a left turn into the site had to be
restricted. Transportation Manager Para answered that a u-turn can
not be made. Transportation Manager Para stated that signage is part
of the project, in response to a suggestion made be Chairman
Wagner. Mayor Lewis said there will be the City’s standard route
signs.
Member Osborne suggested changing the address to the AVHS so
drivers will be routed to enter the parking lot off of Oravetz Place
SE. Mayor Lewis supported assigning as Oravetz Place SE and asked
that the Public Works staff work with the Planning and Development
staff.
Item B – Airport Roof Elastometric Coating: Vice-Chair Peloza
reported that good progress is being made and the cost will probably
come in under budget. Member Osborne stated the same contractor
did work at Tacoma Industrial and that work turned out well.
D. Activities Matrix (Dowdy)
Item A – Street Lighting: Chairman Wagner asked that the topic be
brought back to the Committee for review next year, during the next
budget cycle.
Chairman Wagner asked that 102nd Place SE Lighting be added to
the matrix.
Chairman Wagner asked that an examination of parking on Main
Street for the Boardwalk be added to the matrix. Chairman Wagner
stated he would like to discuss the option of developing just parking
spaces as a sub-project and not waiting until entire West Main Street
development project moves forward.
Chairman Wagner asked staff for an estimate of cost to construct
maybe one or two parking spaces on W. Main Street at the entrance
for the Boardwalk. Mayor Lewis asked for an estimate for the most
cost efficient number of parking space.
Page 8 of 9
CA.A Page 11 of 168
The Committee and Director Dowdy discussed what type of parking
may be feasible.
“Parking Spaces on Main Street for Boardwalk” will be added to the
matrix. Member Osborne suggested that action items and/or follow
up items that are brought forward by the Committee be included in the
matrix. The Committee agreed. The Activities Matrix will be re-titled
the Public Works Committee Action Matrix and the Committee will
determine which items will be included on the matrix.
Member Osborne suggested items from the last Public Works
Committee Meeting minutes, “Map of Completed Projects” and
“Sidewalk Program Funding Source” be added to the matrix.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:44 p.m.
Approved this ______ day of ______, 2012.
__________________________ ______________________________
Rich Wagner, Chairman Jennifer Cusmir, Department Secretary
Page 9 of 9
CA.A Page 12 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Right-of-Way Permit No. 12-21
Date:
August 28, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Special Conditions
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-21 for Home Plate
Pub Outdoor Seating Area.
Background Summary:
Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-21 is a request from Home Plate Pub for an outdoor
seating area located in the B Street Plaza, adjacent to the Home Plate Pub for a term of
5 years. The applicant is proposing to fence off an area of the B Street Plaza for
exclusive use by their patrons year round. Food and beverages, including alcohol, would
be served and consumed in this area.
Please see the attached conditions and map for additional information.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Mund
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:CA.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B Page 13 of 168
Right of Way Use Permit Special Conditions
For Home Plate Pub Sidewalk Café/Outdoor Seating
ROW #12-21 5-Year Term
1. Applicant’s failure to comply with any provisions/conditions of this permit
shall be terms for immediate termination.
2. Applicant shall maintain current insurance throughout the life of the permit
and provide the City with proof that they are insured per the requirements
outlined in the Right of Way Use Permit Application.
a. Additionally, the applicant’s insurance will include a Liquor Liability
Endorsement naming the City as an additional insured.
3. Applicant shall provide a signed and notarized Hold Harmless Agreement
before this permit shall be issued.
4. Applicant agrees to comply with the City’s nuisance code under ACC 8.12.
5. Applicant shall keep the permitted area of use free of litter and drink or
food waste.
6. The applicant shall acquire a Construction Permit from the City prior to
working in the public right-of-way.
7. The City reserves the right to adjust the terms and conditions or revoke
this Right-of-Way Use Permit based on the following considerations:
a. Public complaints involving perceived issues on the impact of the
permitted use on the public use of the B Street Plaza.
b. Any emerging issue or change in use of the ROW that may impact
the public interest, as follows:
i. The remaining capacity of the B Street Plaza rights-of-way to
accommodate other public uses.
ii. The effect, if any, on public health, and safety.
8. Applicant shall maintain and provide copies of current license or permit
from the Washington State Liquor Control Board for Sidewalk Café
Service to the City throughout the life of the permit.
9. Outdoor seating area shall be signed 21 and over only. Applicant shall
staff outdoor seating area at all times to ensure that all patrons are of legal
age as required by law and Applicant’s employees shall require proof of
age 21 or over from all patrons in outdoor seating area.
10. Fencing around the entire outdoor seating area is required. Fencing shall
meet the following requirements;
CA.B Page 14 of 168
a. Fencing must be 42 inches in height or fencing must be the height
required by the State Liquor Control Board.
b. Fencing must be generally transparent and cannot be solid.
c. Fencing must be constructed of high quality fencing materials such
as steel, glass, or finished wood. Plastic, unfinished wood or
pressure-treated lumber is not allowed.
d. Fencing must be a minimum of 36 inches from all sides of the
Parks, Arts and Recreation Department’s sign kiosk and trees
located in the B Street Plaza to allow for city maintenance.
11. Outdoor seating area may not be used for any use other than food and
beverage service associated with the adjoining business. Outdoor storage
or other uses are strictly prohibited.
12. When open, the bottom rim of umbrellas must be a minimum of 8 feet
above the ground.
13. The outdoor seating area must be accessible and detectable as required
by American with Disabilities Act (ADA) guidelines.
a. All seating and tables must be movable in order to accommodate
wheelchair access.
14. Applicant shall conform to any and all requirements from the Building
Department for commercial building improvements.
15. Applicant shall obtain a Building Permit for any new or altered building
entrances or exits including those in the fencing surrounding the outdoor
seating area.
16. Applicant is to ensure the permitted area will be accessible for emergency
responders.
17. Applicant will provide a 24 hour contact phone number.
18. Applicant shall ensure that paths to exterior doorways and gates opening
onto the B Street Plaza will remain unobstructed at all times and maintain
minimum pathway width of 44” or width of doorways or gates, whichever is
greater.
19. The applicant will be financially responsible for the removal of any
temporary or permanent objects that are placed by the applicant in the
right-of-way. This could include but not be limited to objects such as
fencing, tables and chairs, signs, planters, and lights, etc. The applicant
shall have 14 days to remove any temporary or permanent objects.
CA.B Page 15 of 168
20. Any damage to city property caused by the actions covered under this
permit shall be restored by the applicant upon completion of their use of
the area.
21. All restorations shall be in accordance with City standards.
22. The Applicant shall, at its own expense, return the permitted area to the
condition it was in on the date of the permit approval or better, when the
permit expires or when the permit is otherwise terminated or cancelled.
23. Applicant shall submit a proposed method of annual cleaning of the brick
pavers in the area of use for administrative approval prior to permit
issuance. Applicant shall be responsible for any cost of proposed method
of annual cleaning.
24. The Applicant shall provide the City with and maintain in full force and
effect throughout the life of this permit adequate financial security in a
form and substance acceptable to the City, securing the Applicants
compliance with the terms and conditions of this Right of Way Use Permit.
Such guarantees shall be in the form of a performance bond in the amount
of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00).
25. The Applicant shall keep and maintain in full force and effect a policy of
general liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured, in an
amount of not less than one million dollars coverage, and in a form
acceptable to the City, and shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend any
claims, law suits or other legal actions arising out of the Applicant’s use of
the right-of-way or Applicant’s activities thereon.
CA.B Page 16 of 168
CA.B Page 17 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Right-of-Way Permit No. 12-26
Date:
August 28, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Special Conditions
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee approve Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 12-26 for Auburn Parks,
Arts and Recreation Veterans Day Parade.
Background Summary:
Right-of-Way Use permit 12-26 would allow the City of Auburn Parks, Arts and
Recreation Department to use City streets on Saturday, November 10, 2012, from 6:00
am to 11:00 pm, for their annual Veterans Day Parade, Static Display and Band
Championship. Please see the attached list of street closures and map for specific street
closures and times. The Parks Department will make all necessary street closure
arrangements with Public Works Dept, Police Dept. and Fire Authority.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Mund
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:CA.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.C Page 18 of 168
ROW Use Permit 12-26, Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation
Veterans Day Parade
The conditions of this ROW Use Permit are:
1. Applicant shall maintain a 5-foot clear path for pedestrians on the
sidewalk.
2. Applicant shall adhere to the approved traffic control plan and street
closure list.
3. Auburn Police will close the intersection of Auburn Way S/N and East
Main Street to all traffic , with the exception of emergency vehicles
4. Auburn Police Explorers will direct traffic at the intersections of Auburn
Way North and 4th Street NE, Auburn Way North and 1st Street NE,
Auburn Ave and 1st Street NE, West Main Street and B St NW, and
Auburn Way South and 2nd Street SE.
5. Applicant shall provide parade marshals stationed at D Street NE and E
Main Street to clear pedestrians in the event of a police response
emergency.
6. Applicant shall obtain a Parade Permit from the Planning and
Development Department.
7. Applicant shall provide access and maintain permitted space for Girl Dog
Inc. Girl Dog Inc is permitted under ROW #12-11 and located on the north
side of East Main Street in front of the B Street Parking lot in the ROW at
137 E Main Street.
8. The City reserves the right to adjust the terms and conditions or revoke
this Right-of-Way Use Permit pending the following considerations:
a. Public complaints involving perceived issues impacting public use of
the ROW affected by the permit.
b. Public comment or other community interest concerns.
c. Any emerging issue or change in use of the ROW that may impact the
public interest, as follows:
• The remaining capacity of the rights-of-way to accommodate other
uses if the applicant’s proposed use is granted.
• The effect, if any, on public health, safety, and welfare if the
authorization is granted.
• Such other factors as may demonstrate that the grant to use the
rights-of-way will serve the community interest.
CA.C Page 19 of 168
CA.C Page 20 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4853
Date:
August 29, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4853
Exhibit A
U.S. Geological Survey Proposal
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend City Council adopt Resolution No. 4853.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 4853 authorizes the Mayor to negotiate and execute a Agreement
between the City of Auburn and the U.S. Geological Survey d/b/a/ USGS.
The USGS is developing a regional groundwater model that will be available for use by
state, county, and local governments, public water purveyors, and local stake holder
groups to evaluate potential human and climatic impacts on water resources in the
Puyallup River watershed.
The City Water Utility will benefit by using the model to identify groundwater recharge
areas and more accurately delineate well head protection areas. The model will provide
the Water Utility with a means to evaluate potential water quality impacts associated with
current land use and future changes in land use associated with growth plans. The
model also is a "predictive tool" designed to assist in decision making and help answer
questions about the effects on future groundwater levels and stream flows from
increases in groundwater withdrawals, changes in precipitation, and alterations in land
use.
The project requires funding of $15,000 per year for three (3) years totaling $45,000.
Monies from the 430 Water fund will be used to pay for the project.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Repp
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:RES.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 21 of 168
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 22 of 168
----------------------------
Resolution No. 4853
August 28, 2012
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 4 8 5 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE U.S.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR WATER RESOURCES
INVESTIGATION
WHEREAS, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) will be conducting a study and
mapping project to address groundwater available and sustainability; and
WHEREAS, the USGS has offered to allow local jurisdictions to participate in the
scoping of the project and will provide access to and copies of the database in return for
the participating jurisdictions sharing the cost of the project; and
WHEREAS, The groundwater model developed by USGS can be used by the
City to make water resouce decisions related to water rights and watey supply for the
City’s Water Utility; and
WHEREAS, City of Auburn staff recommends that the City participate in the
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an
Agreement between the City and the U.S. Geological Survey for Water Resource
Investigations, which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement
attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference.
RES.A Page 23 of 168
----------------------------
Resolution No. 4853
August 28, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
_________________________
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
RES.A Page 24 of 168
Form 9-1366
(Oct. 2005) U.S. Department of the Interior Customer #:
U.S. Geological Survey Agreement #:
Joint Funding Agreement Project #:
TIN #:
Fixed Cost
Agreement Yes No
FOR
WATER RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into as of the day of , by the U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, party of the first part, and the ,
party of the second part.
1. The parties hereto agree that subject to availability of appropriations and in accordance with their
respective authorities there shall be maintained in cooperation a, herein called the program. The USGS
legal authority is 43 USC 36C; 43 USC 50; and 43 USC 50b.
2. The following amounts shall be contributed to cover all of the cost of the necessary field and analytical
work directly related to this program. 2(b) includes In-Kind Services in the amount of .
by the party of the first part during the period
(a) $ to
by the party of the second part during the period
(b) $ to
(c) Additional or reduced amounts by each party during the above period or succeeding periods as may be
determined by mutual agreement and set forth in an exchange of letters between the parties.
(d) The performance period may be changed by mutual agreement and set forth in an exchange of letters
between the parties..
3. The costs of this program may be paid by either party in conformity with the laws and regulations respectively
governing each party.
4. The field and analytical work pertaining to this program shall be under the direction of or subject to periodic
review by an authorized representative of the party of the first part.
5. The areas to be included in the program shall be determined by mutual agreement between the parties
hereto or their authorized representatives. The methods employed in the field and office shall be those
adopted by the party of the first part to insure the required standards of accuracy subject to modification by
mutual agreement.
6. During the course of this program, all field and analytical work of either party pertaining to this program shall
be open to the inspection of the other party, and if the work is not being carried on in a mutually satisfactory
manner, either party may terminate this agreement upon 60 days written notice to the other party.
7. The original records resulting from this program will be deposited in the office of origin of those records. Upon
request, copies of the original records will be provided to the office of the other party.
8. The maps, records, or reports resulting from this program shall be made available to the public as promptly
as possible. The maps, records, or reports normally will be published by the party of the first part. However,
the party of the second part reserves the right to publish the results of this program and, if already published
by the party of the first part shall, upon request, be furnished by the party of the first part, at costs,
impressions suitable for purposes of reproduction similar to that for which the original copy was prepared.
The maps, records, or reports published by either party shall contain a statement of the cooperative relations
between the parties.
9. USGS will issue billings utilizing Department of the Interior Bill for Collection (form DI-1040). Billing
Resolution No. 4853
Exhibit A
August 28, 2012 RES.A Page 25 of 168
documents are to be rendered__________. Payments of bills are due within 60 days after the billing date. If
not paid by the due date, interest will be charged at the current Treasury rate for each 30 day period, or
portion thereof, that the payment is delayed beyond the due date. (31 USC 3717; Comptroller General File B-
212222, August 23, 1983).
Enter Name of Customer
U.S. Geological Survey
United States
Department of the Interior
USGS Point of Contact Customer Point of Contact
Name: Name:
Address: Address:
Telephone: Telephone:
Email: Email:
Signatures Signatures
By__________________________ Date________ By__________________________
Date________
Name: Cynthia Barton, Ph.D., L.G., L.H.G.Name:
Title: Director, USGS Washington Water
Science Center Title:
By__________________________ Date________ By__________________________
Date________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
By__________________________ Date________ By__________________________
Date________
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Resolution No. 4853
Exhibit A
August 28, 2012 RES.A Page 26 of 168
1
SUMMARY
Characterization of the Groundwater Flow System in the Puyallup River
Watershed, King and Pierce Counties, Washington
A proposal prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the City of Auburn
August 21, 2012
Problem — Groundwater is an important resource for domestic, commercial, and industrial
usage in the Puyallup River Watershed, and groundwater discharge helps maintain late-summer
and early-fall streamflow (baseflow) in many area streams. Consequently, as the population
grows, and commercial and industrial activity increase, so does the demand for groundwater.
However, the quantity of usable groundwater, and the potential effects of future natural
conditions and anthropogenic activities on groundwater resources, as well as potential impacts to
streamflow, are not well understood in the watershed. Additional information is required to help
ensure the long-term sustainability of the area’s groundwater resources, identify groundwater
recharge areas, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas.
Objective — The objectives of the study are to: 1) characterize the groundwater flow system,
and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River Watershed; it is
anticipated that this and other information will be integrated into a numerical groundwater flow
model to contribute to an improved understanding of water resources in the watershed; and
2) continue using and refining a previously developed project Action Plan to guide the project
and provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect groundwater resources using
the model developed from this project and assist water resource managers and water purveyors
with regional water management planning and decision-making.
Relevance and Benefits — This study directly supports USGS mission and goals related to
water-resource issues identified in the USGS Science Strategy. The study addresses groundwater
availability and sustainability, a priority issue under the Water Census of the United States as
outlined in Facing Tomorrow’s challenges: USGS Science in the Decade 2007-2017. This study
also will provide resource managers and stake holders in the Puyallup River watershed with the
means to evaluate potential hydrologic and anthropogenic impacts on groundwater and surface-
water resources, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas. This study is
appropriate for inclusion in the USGS Cooperative Program because it will provide information
that advances understanding of hydrologic processes.
Approach — Available groundwater and surface-water data will be compiled and evaluated to
construct hydrogeologic unit extent and thickness maps for all unconsolidated aquifer and
confining units in the groundwater-flow system, and to delineate gaining and losing river
reaches. All groundwater and surface-water data will be verified and entered into the USGS
National Water Information System data base. Estimates of water use and groundwater recharge
will be conducted, and groundwater-level maps will be constructed.
RES.A Page 27 of 168
2
Characterization of the Groundwater Flow System in the Puyallup River
Watershed, King and Pierce Counties, Washington
A proposal prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey for the City of Auburn
August 21, 2012
Background — The Puyallup River Watershed (PRW) occupies a 1,053 square-mile area in
King and Pierce Counties, in western Washington (fig. 1). The north to northwest flowing
Puyallup River, and several major tributaries (the White and Carbon Rivers) originate within
sparsely populated mountains of the Cascade Range to the east and traverse suburban, urban, and
industrial areas before discharging to Puget Sound to the west. The watershed is underlain by a
westward thickening sequence of unconsolidated Quaternary glacial and interglacial deposits,
underlain by Tertiary and older sedimentary, volcanic, and metamorphic bedrock units. Major
population centers within the watershed include the cities of Tacoma, Puyallup, Auburn, Kent,
Sumner, and Orting.
Problem — Groundwater is an important resource for domestic, commercial, and industrial
usage in the PRW, and groundwater discharge helps maintain late-summer and early-fall
streamflow (baseflow) in area streams. Consequently, as the population grows, and commercial
and industrial activity increase, so does the demand for groundwater. However, the quantity of
usable groundwater, and the potential effects of future natural conditions and anthropogenic
activities on groundwater resources, as well as potential impacts of groundwater withdrawals on
stream flow, are not well understood in the watershed. Additional information is required to help
ensure the long-term sustainability of the area’s groundwater and surface-water resources,
identify groundwater recharge areas, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas.
RES.A Page 28 of 168
3
Objective — The objectives of the study are to: 1) characterize the groundwater flow system,
and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River Watershed; it is
anticipated that this and other information will be integrated into a numerical groundwater flow
model to contribute to an improved understanding of water resources in the watershed; and
2) continue using and refining a previously developed project action plan to guide the project and
provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect groundwater resources using the
model developed from this project and assist water resource managers and water purveyors with
regional water management planning and decision-making.
Relevance and Benefits — This study directly supports USGS mission and goals related to
water-resource issues identified in the USGS Science Strategy. The study addresses groundwater
availability and sustainability, a priority issue under the Water Census of the United States as
outlined in Facing Tomorrow’s challenges: USGS Science in the Decade 2007-2017. This study
also will provide resource managers and stake holders in the Puyallup River watershed with the
means to evaluate potential hydrologic and anthropogenic impacts on groundwater and surface-
water resources, and more accurately delineate well head protection areas. This study is
appropriate for inclusion in the USGS Cooperative Program because it will provide information
that advances understanding of hydrologic processes.
Approach — Available groundwater and surface-water data will be compiled and evaluated to
construct hydrogeologic unit extent and thickness maps for all unconsolidated aquifer and
confining units in the groundwater-flow system, and to delineate gaining and losing river
reaches. All groundwater and surface-water data will be verified and entered into the USGS
National Water Information System data base. Estimates of water use and groundwater recharge
will be conducted, and groundwater-level maps will be constructed. All currently available data
RES.A Page 29 of 168
4
will be compiled to evaluate its accuracy, and will be entered in the USGS NWIS groundwater
site inventory and surface water databases (GWSI and ADAPS). The study area is within the
Puget Sound Regional Aquifer System, which was described at a regional scale by Vaccaro and
others (1998), and a portion of the study area along the lower Puyallup River was described by
Jones and others (1999). Data to be compiled will include: a) information describing the areal
extent, thickness, and lithologic composition of aquifers and confining units, groundwater levels,
aquifer boundary conditions, and the spatial distribution of aquifer hydraulic properties; b) land-
use coverages; c) aquifer recharge data (precipitation, leakage from surface-water features,
anthropogenic return flows, and inflows from adjacent areas); d) aquifer discharge data
(withdrawals from wells, baseflow to surface-water features, evapotranspiration estimates, and
underflow to adjacent units); and e) streamflow, lake-level, and dam operation records for the
study area to identify possible trends and delineate gaining and losing stream reaches.
A spatially oriented project database(s) for storage, evaluation, and analysis of currently
available information for the study area will be established using a combination of GIS and data
management and analysis software (ArcGIS, GWSI, etc.). The database will integrate
information from multiple sources, and will be continually populated with new data as they
become available. All data will be checked for accuracy in accordance with the USGS
Washington Water Science Center QA/QC Plan for ground-water activities (Drost, 2005). The
database will contain information about geology, hydrology, water use, and land use in the study
area, and will be accessible to all project members.
A groundwater monitoring network has been established and stream baseflow has been
measured as part of a separate but related study being conducted by the USGS in cooperation
with stake holders in the PRW, and these data will be available for use in this study and
RES.A Page 30 of 168
5
eventually will be integrated into the numerical flow model of the watershed. The plan for
collecting these data is briefly described below.
– Establish Groundwater Monitoring Network (FY12-13) – A well-records inventory and a field
inventory (well location and access permission) of 245 wells was conducted and selected wells
(4 wells) were instrumented with continuous water-level recorders. A monthly groundwater-level
monitoring network (110 wells) was established and will be operated for 2 years. All water-level
data are reviewed for accuracy, and entered into the USGS database (GWSI).
– Conduct Stream Baseflow Measurements (FY12-13) – Stream baseflow measurements were
made to delineate gaining and losing stream reaches. Baseflow measurements were conducted
(October 2011) at 36 sites to augment the 14 USGS surface-water gaging stations currently
operating in the study area. Measurements were made during low-flow conditions to document
the exchange of water between aquifers and streams. A second baseflow measurement is
scheduled for September/October of 2012. All baseflow measurements are reviewed for
accuracy, and entered into the USGS database (ADAPS).
An overview of the specific tasks needed to complete each element of the study is presented
below. A project timeline and budget are given at the end of this document. The project duration
is expected to be approximately 2.5 years. An Action Plan was developed by the USGS and
Pierce Conservation District in close cooperation with the Washington State Department of
Health to guide the study and provide a framework for project partners to manage and protect
groundwater resources using the PRW model and assist water resource managers and water
purveyors with regional water management planning and decision-making. The Action Plan is
given at the end of this document, the implementation schedule is provided in a separate
attachment.
RES.A Page 31 of 168
6
Task 1.0 Hydrogeologic Framework (FY12-13) – The interpretation of the hydrogeologic
framework of the PRW will be based primarily on existing maps of surficial geology and the
lithologic information from drillers’ logs. Eight to ten hydrogeologic cross sections will be
constructed for the study area. After the sections are constructed and the major hydrogeologic
units have been identified, maps of the extent and thicknesses of the major units will be
constructed. Hydraulic properties will be estimated for hydrogeologic units using available data
from aquifer tests, drillers’ reports (specific capacity tests), and published values.
Task 2.0 Estimate Water Use (FY13) – Current and historical water-use information will be
obtained from the Washington State Department of Health, Washington State Department of
Agriculture and water purveyors located within the PRW. Census records, per capita estimates of
water use in King County (Lane, 2009), and land-use coverages will be used to estimate exempt
(unregulated) uses including lawns, parks and cemeteries, non-commercial gardens, and small-
scale industrial uses.
Task 3.0 Estimate Groundwater Recharge (FY13) – The distribution of groundwater recharge
from precipitation will be estimated by applying precipitation-recharge relations based on
regression equations developed for areas in Washington State by Bidlake and Payne (2001), that
incorporate the effects of surficial characteristics such as surficial hydrogeology and land cover.
Recharge estimates will be compared to previously published values (Vaccaro and others, 1998;
Jones and others, 1999).
Task 4.0 Construct Water-Level Maps (FY13-14) – Construction of water-level maps for major
aquifers in the PRW will be based primarily on data from a monthly groundwater-level
monitoring network established as part of a separate but related USGS study in the PRW (see
RES.A Page 32 of 168
7
Approach for a brief description of this work). Water-level maps will provide information about
groundwater flow directions, and horizontal and vertical groundwater gradients.
Task 5.0 Conceptual Model and Report (FY13-14) – A report summarizing the conceptual
model of the PRW will be prepared and published by March 31, 2013. The USGS Publication
Service Center (PSC) will provide illustration, editorial, and publishing services. The conceptual
model report will include descriptions of: a) information describing the extent and thickness, and
lithologic composition of major aquifers and confining units, aquifer boundary conditions, and
the spatial distribution of aquifer hydraulic properties; b) groundwater movement as it relates to
aquifers, aquitards, and surface-water features; c) land-use coverages; d) aquifer recharge data
(precipitation, leakage from surface-water features, anthropogenic return flows, and inflows from
tributary basins and adjacent uplands); e) aquifer discharge data (withdrawals from wells,
baseflow to surface-water features, and underflow to adjacent units and Puget Sound); and f)
streamflow and lake-level records for the PRW to identify possible trends and delineate gaining
and losing stream reaches.
Budget — The project will cost $490,400 over three fiscal years (FY 2012-2014). Project costs
will be shared equally by the USGS and our project partners. Current funding partners include:
City of Tacoma, City of Puyallup, City of Sumner, Cascade Water Alliance, Lakehaven Utility
District, Summit Water & Supply Company, The Russell Family Foundation, and Washington
State Department of Health. The portion of project costs to be provided by the City of Auburn is
$45,000.
Funding Sources —
Agency FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
USGS $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
City of Auburn $15,000 $15,000 $15,000
Total $30,000 $30,000 $30,000
RES.A Page 33 of 168
8
Timelines and Report Products — The USGS will prepare and publish a Scientific
Investigations Report describing the hydrogeologic framework, groundwater movement, and
water budget for the study area. The report will be published by September 30, 2014. The USGS
will provide annual project updates to all project partners describing project progress and any
issues relating to the completion of specific project tasks. A project website will be established
and maintained for the duration of the study. A time line for the project is provided in the table
below.
Calendar Year
20
1
1
2012 2013 2014
Federal Fiscal Year
2012 2013 2014
Quarter starting Oc
t
Ja
n
Ap
r
Ju
l
y
Oc
t
Ja
n
Ap
r
Ju
l
y
Oc
t
Ja
n
Ap
r
Ju
l
y
Task 1.0 Hydrogeologic
framework
X X X X
Task 2.0 Estimate water
use
X X
Task 3.0 Estimate
Groundwater recharge
X X
Task 4.0 Water-level maps X X
Task 5.0 Conceptual
model report
X X X X
RES.A Page 34 of 168
9
References
Bidlake, W.R., and Payne, K.L., 2001, Estimating recharge to ground water from precipitation at
Naval Submarine Base Bangor and Vicinity, Kitsap County, Washington: U.S Geological Survey
Water Resources Investigations Report 01-4110, 33 p.
Drost, B.W., Quality-assurance plan for ground-water activities, U.S. Geological Survey,
Washington Water Science Center: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1126-online
only, 27 p.
Jones, M.A., Orr, L.A., Ebbert, J.C., and Sumioka, S.S., 1999, Ground-water hydrology of the
Tacoma-Puyallup area, Pierce County, Washington: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources
Investigations Report 99-4013, 154 p.
Lane, R.C., 2009, Estimated water use in Washington, 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific
Investigations Report 2009-5128, 30 p.
Vaccaro, J.J., A.J. Hansen, and M.S. Jones. 1998, Hydrogeologic framework for the Puget Sound
aquifer system, Washington and British Columbia: USGS Professional Paper 1424-D, 77 p.
RES.A Page 35 of 168
10
Figure 1. Map of Puyallup River Watershed study area.
RES.A Page 36 of 168
11
Figure 2. Map of Puyallup River Watershed study area.
RES.A Page 37 of 168
12
Action Plan: Puyallup River Watershed, King and Pierce
Counties, Washington
Prepared by Pierce Conservation District
April 26, 2012
Project Objectives —The objectives of the project are to characterize the groundwater flow
system, and its interaction with associated surface water features in the Puyallup River
Watershed, and integrate this information into a numerical flow model to contribute to an
improved understanding of water resources in the watershed.
Project Action Plan—The project action plan contains four elements (described below) and
will be used to guide the project and provide a framework for project partners to manage and
protect groundwater resources using the model developed from the five-year project and assist
water resource managers and water purveyors with regional water management planning and
decision-making.
Action Plan Elements —
a. How will the model be used in the future and how it will benefit purveyors in the area.
The model will be available for use by state, county, and local governments, public water
purveyors, and local stake holder groups to evaluate potential anthropogenic and climatic
impacts on water resources in the watershed. Public water purveyors may benefit by using the
model to identify groundwater recharge areas and more accurately delineate well head protection
areas. The model will provide purveyors with a means to evaluate potential water quality impacts
associated with current land use and future changes in land use associated with growth plans.
The model also is a "predictive tool" designed to assist in decision making and help answer
questions about the effects on future groundwater levels and stream flows of projected increases
in groundwater withdrawals, changes in precipitation, and alterations in land use. Public water
purveyors may benefit by using the model to evaluate mitigation alternatives associated with
potential adverse impacts from current well production and future increases in well withdrawals.
b. How will the model be made available to purveyors, county administrators, and other
organizations that might benefit from it.
The model code (MODFLOW) and input files will be permanently archived with appropriate
documentation by the USGS and will be available upon request to purveyors, county
administrators, and all other entities. USGS publications describing the groundwater flow system
and model with input files will be available from the project website. Several public meetings
will be held during the course of the five-year project to present project results and provide stake
holders with information about the model and guidelines for its use.
The first public meeting is scheduled for March 2012 and will present information describing
preliminary results from the groundwater and surface water monitoring networks, a status report
on the development of the hydrogeologic framework; and a discussion of the project Action Plan
and our strategy for implementation of long-term model stewardship. Subsequent public
meetings will be scheduled to coincide with the completion of major project tasks: November
RES.A Page 38 of 168
13
2012 (completed hydrogeologic framework, water use, and groundwater recharge); July 2013
(completed Data Series report, begin numerical modeling); June 2014 (completed Conceptual
Model Report and steady-state model, begin transient model; March 2015 (completed transient
model and simulations); September 2015 (completed numerical model report and final results;
model and data archive and website, implementation of long-term model stewardship). As part of
our outreach strategy, periodic project updates also will be provided at Regional Water
Association (RWA) and other local meetings.
c. How will the purveyors in the area be involved in the project, including identifying
partners, actions, time frames, and funding sources for the project.
All purveyors in the project area have been contacted by USGS staff, provided project work
plans describing project objectives, methods, and work elements, and invited to attend monthly
project team meetings. USGS staff are working closely with purveyors in the area to identify
potential public supply wells to include in the monthly groundwater monitoring network,
compile available aquifer test results, and compile water withdrawal and conveyance loss data.
Purveyors will be consulted on a regular basis during the project (monthly project team
meetings, public meetings, RWA meetings, and via email) to ensure project relevance to water
resource issues in the watershed. Purveyors will be encouraged to attend scheduled public
meetings, and to visit the project website to obtain current project updates and results. Purveyors
also will be encouraged to participate on the Advisory Group to ensure the best possible science
is considered during water resource decision-making. Several purveyors in the area are providing
funding for the project.
d. How will the model be maintained over time, and by whom.
The model code and input files will be permanently archived with appropriate documentation by
the USGS Washington Water Science Center. Long-term model stewardship will be
accomplished through the formation of an Advisory Group to provide a resource for future
model users as well as a repository for model data coverages and results. The model is dynamic
and capable of evolving as new information becomes available for model improvement. The
Advisory Group also may facilitate the collection, archive, and integration of newly collected
data into the evolving model. It is anticipated that the Advisory Group will meet at least semi-
annually after the model is completed to address issues relating to new data and ongoing model
use and results.
Advisory Group membership will reflect local technical expertise and water resource
perspectives. Members of the project team will likely serve as initial members of the Advisory
Group and participate in initial stewardship activities. Members of the project team currently
include Pierce Conservation District, Washington State Department of Health, Cascade Water
Alliance, Tacoma Water, Lakehaven Utility District, Robinson-Noble Inc., and the cities of
Sumner and Puyallup. Project team membership reflects a diverse range of interests including:
water resource sustainability; protection of riparian habitat and endangered species; well head
protection; and environmental evaluations of growth management plans. Discussions regarding
future project team membership are ongoing and include the cities of Orting, Auburn, Kent,
Bonney Lake, Fife, and Enumclaw. Although Tribal participation on the project team is unlikely
at this time, the objectives of the study have been discussed with representatives of the Puyallup
and Muckleshoot tribes.
RES.A Page 39 of 168
14
A plan for the implementation of long-term model stewardship will be developed by the project
team during monthly meetings beginning in the fall of 2011. Meetings are scheduled for the
second Tuesday of every month and agenda items will include discussions of: 1) membership in
the Advisory Group; 2) the role (responsibilities) of the Advisory Group; 3) the design of the
model archive including data coverages and results; 4) how to ensure all stake holders are aware
of the model archive and its potential use; and 5) the technical expertise required to use the
model. A draft plan for the implementation of long-term model stewardship will be prepared by
March 30, 2012 and submitted to Washington State Department of Health for comment.
Future Model Use
Previous USGS modeling projects have identified technical expertise as a limiting factor in the
successful use of its models by stake holders. The Advisory Group should consider this issue
when formulating the plan for long-term model stewardship. The plan may need to acknowledge
that competent use of the model (especially if model modification are involved) may be beyond
the technical capabilities of most stake holders, and that “outside” technical expertise may be
required in some instances. Purveyors typically turn to environmental consulting firms to provide
the technical expertise for a variety of services including conducting aquifer tests and running
local scale numerical flow models. Our project team includes local consultants to insure
familiarity with our models for future use on behalf of purveyors. An important role of our
Advisory Group will be to serve as a repository of technical expertise to assist purveyors and
other stake holders with model use in the future.
Deliverables
The USGS will prepare and publish three scientific reports: 1) Data Series Report containing
monthly groundwater-level and synoptic stream baseflow measurements, and associated
information about the data collection sites. This report will be published by September 30, 2013;
2) Conceptual Model Report describing hydrogeologic framework, groundwater movement, and
water budget. This report will be published by December 31, 2014; and 3) Numerical Model
Report describing model construction, calibration, and selected simulations. This report will be
published and the model, including input files, will be transferred to the project partners by
September 30, 2015.
The USGS will provide annual project updates to all project partners describing project progress
and any issues relating to the completion of specific project tasks. A project website will be
established and maintained for the duration of the study.
RES.A Page 40 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4854
Date:
August 29, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4854
Original Memorandum of Agreement
Memorandum of Agreement - Revision 2
Memorandum of Agreement - Revision 1
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend City Council adopt Resolution No. 4854.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 4854 authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to amend the existing
Memorandum of Agreement for traffic maintenance services between the City of Auburn
and Pierce County from a budget level of $125,000 annually to $175,000 annually.
In 2011 the City of Auburn executed the memorandum of agreement with Pierce County
Traffic Services division to provide roadway maintenance south of the White River in order
to test the competitiveness and quality of Pierce Counties services as compared to King
County. Staff was very pleased with the customer service and quality of work provided by
Pierce County and expanded the scope of the agreement to provide for citywide roadway
striping services with MOA Amendment #1. MOA Amendment #2 provides the budget
authority for initiating the citywide LED signal head re-lamping project.
There is $50,000 budgeted for LED signal head re-lamping in the engineering budget.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:RES.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.B Page 41 of 168
Resolution No. 4854
August 29, 2012
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4854
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO AMEND THE
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH PIERCE
COUNTY FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING ROAD
SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn owns public roads and traffic devices which
require periodic maintenance and/or other improvements; and
WHEREAS, Pierce County Transportation Services Division is in a
position to provide certain emergency services, maintenance and road
improvements services for the City at a cost that is advantageous to the City;
and
WHEREAS, the City previously entered into a contract with the Pierce
County Transportation Services Division for such emergency, maintenance and
road improvements services; and
WHEREAS, increasing the contract would benefit both the City and the
County by cost savings to the City and a fuller utilization of County equipment at a
fair rate of compensation; and
WHEREAS, the parties are authorized by Chapter 39.34 of the Revised
Code of Washington to enter into an interlocal cooperation agreement of this
nature.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
RES.B Page 42 of 168
Resolution No. 4854
August 29, 2012
Page 2
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to
amend the Memorandum of Agreement, in substantial conformity with the
Amendment attached hereto, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by
this reference.
Section 2. That the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized to implement
such other administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the
directives of this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of ________________, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
RES.B Page 43 of 168
RES.B Page 44 of 168
RES.B Page 45 of 168
RES.B Page 46 of 168
RES.B Page 47 of 168
RES.B Page 48 of 168
RES.B Page 49 of 168
Memorandum of Agreement #11-79192
Amendment #2
Page 1
SECOND AMENDMENT TO
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT NO. 11-79192
BETWEEN PIERCE COUNTY
AND
CITY OF AUBURN
REGARDING TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT to Agreement 11-79192 is entered into between
PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of
Washington(herein referred to as “COUNTY”), and CITY OF AUBURN, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington (herein referred to as “CITY”).
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into Agreement No.11-
79192 fully executed on July 8, 2011, to establish the rights, duties, and responsibilities
of the parties with regards to the traffic maintenance services requested by the CITY; and
WHEREAS; said Agreement was amended to add additional funds due to
estimated work exceeding original budget due to the CITY requesting road striping
services, by the First Amendment on June 5, 2012, and
WHEREAS, the CITY is requesting the COUNTY provide additional services to
replace LED lighting modules in their traffic signals which costs would exceed the
estimated amount allowable per calendar year in this agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by each
of the parties;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
1. The COUNTY shall provide the agreed upon requested services to the CITY in
accordance with this agreement.
2. The maximum consideration of this agreement shall be increased from $125,000
per calendar year to $175,000 per calendar year for 2012 and 2013.
3. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
RES.B Page 50 of 168
Memorandum of Agreement #11-79192
Amendment #2
Page 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this amendment to be
duly executed, such parties acting by their representatives being there unto duly
authorized.
The parties have executed this Agreement this ___ day of September, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
______________________________
Mayor Date
______________________________
ATTEST: Date
______________________________
City Clerk Date
______________________________
Approved as to Form Date
______________________________
City Attorney Date
PIERCE COUNTY
___________________________________
DEPUTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
Date
(as to form only)
___________________________________
BUDGET AND FINANCE
Approved:
___________________________________
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Date
RES.B Page 51 of 168
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT NO. 11-79192
BETWEEN PIERCE COUNTY
AND
CITY OF AUBURN
REGARDING TRAFFIC MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT to Agreement 11-79192 is entered into between
PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation and political subdivision of the State of
Washington(herein referred to as "COUNTY"), and CITY OF AUBURN, a municipal
corporation of the State of Washington (herein referred to as "CITY").
WHEREAS, the parties hereto have previously entered into Agreement No.11
79192 fully executed on July 8, 2011, to establish the rights, duties, and responsibilities
of the parties with regards to the traffic maintenance services requested by the CITY; and
WHEREAS, the services requested by the CITY costs exceed the estimated
amount allowable per calendar year in this agreement; and
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be derived by each
of the parties;
IT IS HEREBY AGREED as follows:
1. The COUNTY shall provide the agreed upon requested services to the CITY in
accordance with this agreement.
2. The maximum consideration of this agreement shall be increased from $25,000
per calendar year to $125,000 per calendar year for 2012 and 2013.
3. ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT
SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this amendment to be
duly executed, such parties acting by their representatives being there unto duly
authorized.
Memorandum of Agreement #11-79192
Amendment #1
Page 1
RES.B Page 52 of 168
The parties have executed this Agreement this 5th day of June, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN PIERCE COUNTY
Signature Date ROSECUTING ATTORNEY Date
form only)
Title
BUDGET AND FINANCE Date
Approved:
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR Date
Memorandum of Agreement #11-79192
Amendment #1
Page 2
RES.B Page 53 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Bad Debt Write-Off
Date:
August 27, 2012
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Memo
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve the write-off of outstanding utility customer accounts and
miscellaneous accounts receivable in the amount of $13,749.87
Background Summary:
The Finance Department staff has reviewed the aged receivable balances for the utility
customer accounts. Bad debt for the utility accounts represents three tenths of one
percent of annual revenue. The Finance Department staff is recommending that the
outstanding utility customer account balances (listed in Exhibit A) that have been
deemed uncollectible, be written off.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 54 of 168
Page 1 of 1
Interoffice Memorandum
To: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director
From: Brenda Goodson-Moore, Utilities Customer Care Manager
CC: Rhonda Ewing, Financial Services Manager
Date: August 24, 2012
Re: Bad Debt Write-offs
A review of the aged receivable balances for both utility accounts and the miscellaneous accounts
receivable was recently completed. Attached is a detailed listing of the following accounts
recommended for write-off.
Utility Customer Accounts
Services $10,141.48
Penalties $ 2,920.89
Total Utilities $13,062.37
These accounts are greater than six months old and the customers filed bankruptcy.
Miscellaneous A/R accounts
Services $587.50
This account is greater than six months old and the customer filed bankruptcy.
Disputed Shopping Cart Fee $100.00
Abandoned shopping cart, ownership disputed, fee not recoverable.
Total Misc. A/R $687.50
Total Amount to be written off: $13,749.87
DI.A Page 55 of 168
Au
gus
t
2
0
1
2
W
r
i
t
e
o
f
f
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Ex
h
i
b
i
t
A
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
Pe
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
To
t
a
l
A
m
o
u
n
t
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
-
B
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
10
,
1
4
1
.
4
8
$
2,
9
2
0
.
8
9
$
13
,
0
6
2
.
3
7
$
Mi
s
c
A
/
R
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
-
B
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
58
7
.
5
0
$
-
$
58
7
.
5
0
$
Mi
s
c
A
/
R
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
-
O
t
h
e
r
10
0
.
0
0
$
-
$
10
0
.
0
0
$
To
t
a
l
13
,
7
4
9
.
8
7
$
DI.A Page 56 of 168
UT
I
L
I
T
Y
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R
A
C
C
O
U
N
T
S
EX
H
I
B
I
T
B
Ut
i
l
i
t
y
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
-
P
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
W
r
i
t
e
-
o
f
f
s
A
u
g
u
s
t
2
0
1
2
Ac
c
t
Wa
t
e
r
Se
w
e
r
St
o
r
m
Re
f
u
s
e
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
Pe
n
a
l
t
y
To
t
a
l
Nam
e
Se
r
v
i
c
e
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
Co
m
m
e
n
t
s
05
6
4
8
7
20
9
.9
8
2
7
8.
8
4
30
7
.
4
8
79
6
.
3
0
35
0
.
0
0
1,
1
4
6
.
3
0
Ja
r
o
s
l
a
v
S
y
d
r
y
(1)
29
9
0
1
1
14
t
h
W
a
y
S
E
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
ge
4
/
1
0
/
1
2
05
5
7
6
0
40
.
15
1
8
1.
5
2
54
.
8
7
56
.
4
6
33
3
.
0
0
85
.
0
0
41
8
.
0
0
J
a
c
q
u
e
l
i
n
e
L
e
T
ra
n
31
6
B
S
t
N
E
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
3
/
2
0
/
1
2
06
7
1
9
6
35
.
81
4
3.
0
3
12
.
5
2
12
.
1
9
10
3
.
5
5
30
.
0
0
13
3
.
5
5
M
i
c
h
a
e
l
H
e
n
s
e
l
92
9
2
2
n
d
S
t
N
E
#
B
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
2
/
1
5
/
1
2
03
3
4
3
6
77
9
.
92
9
9
0.
0
6
20
0
.
6
0
61
5
.
6
1
2,
5
8
6
.
1
9
11
0
.
3
7
2,
6
9
6
.
5
6
J
u
l
i
e
B
r
o
o
k
s
(
2
)
23
0
6
N
St
N
E
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
2
/
8
/
1
2
06
0
0
7
0
31
.
08
7
2.
6
4
22
.
5
2
21
.
7
9
14
8
.
0
3
-
14
8
.
0
3
D
e
n
n
i
s
&
N
i
n
a
Ko
s
h
u
r
99
9
4
S
E
3
0
4
t
h
C
t
Ch
p
t
r
7
f
i
l
e
d
2
/
2
3
/
1
2
-
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
d
5
/
3
1
/
1
2
06
2
3
3
2
13
9
.
00
1
,
1
2
7.
5
3
35
3
.
9
5
1,
6
2
0
.
4
8
42
4
.
7
6
2,
0
4
5
.
2
4
F
e
d
o
r
M
a
t
s
o
l
a
(
3
)
12
7
4
1
S
E
2
9
6
t
h
W
a
y
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
1
/
3
/
1
2
05
0
5
4
2
99
.
00
2
,
2
8
3.
0
4
70
4
.
9
7
3,
0
8
7
.
0
1
1,
1
7
0
.
7
6
4,
2
5
7
.
7
7
R
i
c
k
y
&
L
e
l
a
R
o
be
r
t
s
(
4
)
65
1
5
M
on
t
e
v
i
s
t
a
D
r
S
E
B
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
5
/
2
3
/
1
2
06
4
3
2
5
26
4
.
5
1
26
4
.
5
1
24
0
.
0
0
50
4
.
5
1
R
e
o
d
i
c
o
&
C
e
le
r
i
n
a
R
o
b
l
e
s
1
1
2
3
3
S
E
3
2
5
t
h
C
t
Ch
p
t
r
7
f
i
l
e
d
1
0
/
1
7
/
1
1
05
0
2
6
9
13
9
.
00
3
5
2.
4
0
11
3
.
4
4
60
4
.
8
4
10
5
.
0
0
70
9
.
8
4
B
r
a
n
d
o
n
P
r
i
c
e
(5
)
11
2
2
6
3
rd
S
t
S
E
#
A
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
d
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
3
/
2
/
1
1
05
7
7
9
9
89
.
7
0
89
.
7
0
60
.
0
0
14
9
.
7
0
J
a
s
o
n
&
W
e
n
d
y
S
a
x
b
y
30
5
4
0
5
6t
h
A
v
e
S
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
2
/
1
3
/
1
2
06
4
0
8
2
13
9
.
0
0
36
8
.
8
7
50
7
.
8
7
34
5
.
0
0
85
2
.
8
7
E
r
i
c
&
A
n
g
e
l
a
Va
n
d
e
r
w
e
r
f
f
(
6
)
5
2
2
0
S
2
98
t
h
C
t
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
-
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
7
/
3
0
/
2
0
1
2
$
10
,
1
4
1
.
4
8
2,
9
2
0
.
8
9
$
13
,
0
6
2
.
3
7
$
To
t
a
l
B
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
cy
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
(
e
x
e
m
p
t
f
r
o
m
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
)
13
,
0
6
2
.
3
7
$
To
t
a
l
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
A
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
Le
g
e
n
d
Ba
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
Pe
r
L
e
g
a
l
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
,
w
r
i
t
e
o
f
f
b
a
l
a
n
c
e
s
p
e
r
D
i
s
c
h
a
r
g
e
o
f
D
e
b
t
o
r
n
o
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
r
o
m
B
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
C
o
u
r
t
Ac
c
o
u
n
t
1
5
6
48
7
S
i
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
-
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
s
s
h
u
t
o
f
f
f
o
r
n
o
n
-
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
5
/
5
/
1
0
,
r
a
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
s
t
o
p
p
e
d
8
/
3
1
/
1
0
e
x
c
e
p
t
s
t
o
r
m
&
p
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
d
t
o
b
i
l
l
u
n
t
i
l
1
1
/
2
3
/
1
1
2
3
3
43
6
M
u
l
t
i
f
a
m
i
l
y
-
W
a
t
e
r
w
a
s
s
h
u
t
o
f
f
f
o
r
n
o
n
-
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
8
/
8
/
1
1
,
r
a
t
e
s
w
e
r
e
s
t
o
p
p
e
d
1
1
/
4
/
1
1
e
x
c
e
p
t
s
t
o
r
m
&
p
e
n
a
l
t
i
e
s
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
t
o
b
i
l
l
3
6
2
33
2
Si
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
-
S
e
w
e
r
,
S
t
o
r
m
,
O
N
L
Y
-
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
l
a
s
t
p
a
i
d
5
/
2
8
/
2
0
0
9
,
f
i
l
e
d
b
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
5
/
3
0
/
2
0
1
2
(
$
1
3
9
.
0
0
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
i
s
f
o
r
l
i
e
n
f
e
e
o
n
l
y
)
4
5
0
54
2
Si
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
-
S
e
w
e
r
,
S
t
o
r
m
,
O
N
L
Y
-
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
l
a
s
t
p
a
i
d
1
0
/
5
/
2
0
0
7
,
f
i
l
e
d
b
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
5
/
2
3
/
2
0
1
2
($
9
9
.
0
0
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
i
s
f
o
r
l
i
e
n
f
e
e
o
n
l
y
)
5
5
0
26
9
Si
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
-
S
e
w
e
r
,
S
t
o
r
m
,
O
N
L
Y
-
C
u
s
t
o
m
e
r
l
a
s
t
p
a
i
d
4
/
1
9
/
1
0
,
f
i
l
e
d
b
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
1
1
/
2
0
/
2
0
1
0
($
1
3
9
.
0
0
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
i
s
f
o
r
l
i
e
n
f
e
e
o
n
l
y
)
6
6
4
08
2
Si
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
-
S
e
w
e
r
,
S
t
o
r
m
O
N
L
Y
-
N
o
p
a
y
m
e
n
t
s
m
a
d
e
o
n
a
c
c
o
u
n
t
s
i
n
c
e
i
t
w
a
s
o
p
e
n
e
d
4
/
7
/
2
0
1
0
,
f
i
l
e
d
b
a
n
k
r
u
p
t
c
y
4
/
2
7
/
2
0
1
2
(
$1
3
9
.
0
0
i
n
w
a
t
e
r
i
s
f
o
r
l
i
e
n
f
e
e
s
o
n
l
y
)
DI.A Page 57 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4851
Date:
August 28, 2012
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4851
CP1009 - Budget Status Sheet
CP0716 - Budget Status Sheet
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
The City Hall Phase 1 Remodel Project (Projects CP1009/CP0716/Contract No. 12-18),
proposes to remodel approximately 11,000 square feet of the existing second floor office
space of City Hall previously occupied by the Planning and Development and Public
Works Departments. There are two capital projects associated with the City Hall Phase 1
Remodel Project comprised of CP1009 and CP0716. Project No. CP1009 is comprised
of tenant improvements to the second floor except HVAC and Project No. 0716 is
comprised of the HVAC improvements. Staff intends to bid these projects as one
contract (Contract No. 12-18) and will require that the lowest responsible bidder conduct
all specified work either directly or through authorized subcontractors. The project is
currently planned to be complete in December 2012 and the Council's passage of
Resolution No. 4851 would facilitate staff's ability to ensure that this timeline is met.
The remodeled space will be occupied by the Human Resources/Risk Management
Department and City Attorney's Office including City Clerk functions. These Departments
do not have enough current adequate space to efficiently and effectively perform
functions and services. Their relocation into the renovated second floor of City Hall will
enhance and improve their ability to provide internal and external customer service. The
project scope includes demolition, installation of new office partitions, new ceilings and
light fixtures, floor and wall finishes, electrical and fire sprinkler redistribution and
heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) upgrades. The HVAC upgrades planned
for the second floor will address sixty (60) percent of the total planned upgrade of the
City Hall HVAC system with the remaining upgrade on the first floor of City Hall to be
accomplished in 2013.
Funding for Project No. CP1009 and Project No. 0716 has been previously approved by
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 58 of 168
the City Council and is available. The attached budget status sheets have been prepared
as information only to advise the City Council of the overall individual and collective
budget statuses of the two projects.
Bid advertisement is scheduled to occur on August 28, 2012 and bid opening is
scheduled to occur on September 19, 2012. Project construction will start the last week
of September 2012 or first week of October 2012.
The Municipal Services Committee recommended passage of Resolution No. 4851 at its
regularly scheduled meeting on August 27, 2012. Staff will bring this Resolution to the
Public Works Committee for discussion on September 4, 2012 and to the City Council for
potetntial action on September 4, 2012.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Municipal Services, Public Works Other: Planning Dept.; Legal
Councilmember:Staff:Snyder
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 59 of 168
----------------------------
Resolution No. 4851
August 23, 2012
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 4851
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LOWEST
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR PUBLIC WORKS
CONTRACT NO.12-18 REGARDING THE AUBURN CITY
HALL REMODEL PHASE 1 PROJECT, NO. CP1009/CP0716
WHEREAS, The Auburn City Council has approved a project to make
improvements to the Auburn City Hall Remodel Phase 1, Project No. CP1009/CP0716;
WHEREAS, recognizing the importance of completing Project CP1009/CP0716
before the end of the year. The project is expected to have a bid opening date of
September 19, 2012. Waiting until the next regularly scheduled meeting to award the
construction Contract No. 12-18, for Project CP1009/CP0716 would result in a 12 day
delay of the construction start date; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to expedite the award of Public
Works Construction Contract No. 12-18, in conformity with the bid documents, and to
authorize the Mayor to take all appropriate steps to execute a contract with the lowest
responsible bidder;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That provided each bid does not exceed the amount budgeted for
project No. CP1009/CP0716, the Mayor is hereby authorized to award, negotiate, and
execute an agreement between the City and the lowest responsible bidder, which
agreement shall conform with the bid documents for public works Contract No. 12-18.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
DI.B Page 60 of 168
----------------------------
Resolution No. 4851
August 23, 2012
Page 2 of 2
Section 3. That the Mayor is authorized to reject all bids if such action is in the
best interest of the City;
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and execution hereof.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of September, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
_________________________
PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
DI.B Page 61 of 168
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: CP1009 Project Title: Auburn City Hall Remodel Phase 1 Project
Project Manager: Steven Burke
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: November 16, 2012 Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: August 28, 2012 Contract Award
Award Date: September 19, 2012 Change Order Approval Date: August 22, 2012
Contract Final Acceptance
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding Prior Years 2011 2012 Future Years Total
328 Fund 539,060 539,060
0
0
Total 0 0 539,060 0 539,060
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Activity Prior Years 2011 2012 Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 0
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 23,000 23,000
Property Acquisition 0
Property Acquisition - Consultant Costs 0
Construction Contract Bid 453,091 453,091
Authorizied Contingency (10%)45,309 45,309
Other - Reproduction, advertising 5,750 5,750
Construction Engineering - City Costs 0
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 0
Total 0 0 527,150 0 527,150
C:\Users\tkriss\Desktop\CP1009 BudgetStatusSheet.xls 1 of 1DI.B Page 62 of 168
Project No: CP0716Project Title:
Project Manager: Steven Burke
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: November 16, 2011 Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: August 28, 2012, 2012 Contract Award
Award Date: September 19, 2012 Change Order Approval Date: August 22, 2012
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
328 Fund 626,500 626,500
0
0
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Auburn City Hall HVAC Upgrade Project
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Total00626,5000626,500
Activity Prior Years 20112012 Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs 0
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 15,400 15,400
Property Acquisition 0
Property Acquisition - Consultant Costs 0
Construction Contract Bid 340,500 340,500
Authorizied Contingency (10%)34,050 34,050
Other - (Indicate what it is)0
Construction Engineering - City Costs 0
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 3,000 3,000
Total00392,9500392,950
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
C:\Users\tkriss\Desktop\CP0716 BudgetStatusSheet.xls1 of 1DI.B Page 63 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4838
Date:
August 20, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4838
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4838.
Background Summary:
The purpose of this Resolution is for the City Council to set a time and date for a public hearing to amend
the 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Para
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C Page 64 of 168
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4838
August 20, 2012
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4838
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, SETTING THE TIME AND DATE FOR
A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE
2013-2018 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the City of Auburn annually
prepare and adopt a comprehensive transportation improvement program for
each ensuing six calendar years to ensure that the City will have available
advance plans as a guide in carrying out a coordinated street construction
program; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires the City Council to annually
conduct a public hearing to review the work accomplished under each six-year
Transportation Improvement Program, and to adopt a revised and extended
comprehensive transportation improvement program.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Resolution is for the City
Council to set a time and date for a public hearing on the 2013-2018
Transportation Improvement Program, to review the work accomplished under
the program, and to identify capital transportation system improvement projects,
and relevant transportation studies.
DI.C Page 65 of 168
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4838
August 20, 2012
Page 2
Section 2. NOTICE OF HEARING. The Council hereby directs that a
notice specifying the time and place of the public hearing shall be published one
time in a newspaper of general circulation and the notice shall also be posted in
three public places. Such public notice shall precede the public hearing by at
least 10 days.
Section 3. DATE OF HEARING. Pursuant to the requirements of State
law, a public hearing on said 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program
will be held on the 17th day of September, 2012, at 7:30 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as reasonably possible, in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City
Hall at 25 West Main Street in Auburn, Washington, before the City Council. All
persons interested in said 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program
may attend and testify at said hearing.
Section 4. AUTHORITY. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives
of this legislation.
Section 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. This resolution shall be in full force and
effect upon passage and signatures hereon.
DI.C Page 66 of 168
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4838
August 20, 2012
Page 3
DATED and SIGNED this _____ day of August, 2012.
CITY OF AUBURN
_______________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
________________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.C Page 67 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4839
Date:
August 21, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4839
2013-2018 Transportation Improvement
Program
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Planning and Community Development Committee to recommend City Council adopt
Resolution No. 4839.
Background Summary:
The purpose of this Resolution is for the City Council to adopt the 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement
Program.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Dowdy/Para
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 68 of 168
Resolution No. 4839
Aug 20, 2012
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4839
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2013-2018
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN PURSUANT TO R.C.W. CHAPTER 35.77 OF THE LAWS
OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City
prepare and adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
for the ensuing six years, but only after conducting a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 2013-2018 Transportation
Improvement Program for the City of Auburn was held on September 17, 2012 at
the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant
to notice published in the legal newspaper of the City of Auburn on September 6,
2012; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit “A,” the
terms of which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully set forth, a
designation of the streets within the corporate limits of the City of Auburn to be
improved in the manner therein set forth during the year set for the improvement
of such street or streets.
Section 2. That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is hereby directed
to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State Department
of Transportation for filing not more than thirty (30) days after the adoption of this
Resolution.
Section 3. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
DI.D Page 69 of 168
Resolution No. 4839
Aug 20, 2012
Page 2
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
DATED this ___ day of September, 2012
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.D Page 70 of 168
Date: August 29, 2012
In an effort of conserve paper, a copy of the 2013 – 2018 Transportation Improvement
Program (TIP) has not been included in the hard copies of the Public Works Committee
Agenda Packet.
The TIP may be viewed by staff on City issued iPads or online at:
http://www.auburnwa.gov/government/city_clerk/agendas/public_works.asp
Hard copies of the TIP will be included in the September 17, 2012 City Council Meeting
Agenda Packets for the Public Hearing and Final Approval.
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Capital Project Status Report
Date:
August 29, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Capital Project Status Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached report.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 159 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
1
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
B
,
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
E
l
l
i
n
g
s
o
n
se
w
e
r
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
2,
9
5
5
,
5
6
9
2,
9
5
5
,
5
6
9
2
,
8
8
6
,
4
2
0
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
9
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
P
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
is
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
a
n
d
m
a
y
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
2
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
C
,
W
h
i
t
e
Ri
v
e
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
an
d
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
s
t
o
r
m
pu
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
2,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
4
,
5
9
3
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
0
9
9
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
P
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
is
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
a
n
d
m
a
y
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
3
CP
1
0
0
5
So
u
t
h
D
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
P
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
of
a
c
o
m
p
r
e
h
e
n
s
i
v
e
p
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
o
n
Di
v
i
s
i
o
n
S
t
.
f
r
o
m
M
a
i
n
S
t
t
o
3
r
d
S
t
SE
/
S
W
.
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
up
g
r
a
d
e
s
t
o
a
l
l
u
t
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
n
e
w
ro
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
s
.
-
3
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(E
D
A
)
4,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
s
)
7,
3
0
0
,
8
7
9
6
,
3
8
9
,
7
5
2
1
0
0
%
M
a
r
-
1
1
9
9
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pu
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
e
a
r
l
y
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
4
CP
0
9
1
6
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
-
S
R
1
8
t
o
W
.
Ma
i
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
W
V
H
be
t
w
e
e
n
S
R
1
8
a
n
d
W
.
M
a
i
n
,
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
si
g
n
a
l
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
W
.
M
a
i
n
.
-
8
7
0
,
0
0
0
80
0
,
0
0
0
2
,
3
4
5
,
6
5
0
(T
I
B
G
r
a
n
t
)
83
,
7
1
0
(1
2
4
F
u
n
d
)
4,
0
9
9
,
3
6
0
4
,
0
4
1
,
9
1
6
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
1
9
9
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
i
n
g
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
i
n
e
a
r
l
y
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
S.
2
7
7
t
h
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
an
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
1
-
y
e
a
r
p
l
a
n
t
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
5
C4
1
0
A
an
d
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
mi
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
.
2
7
7
t
h
G
r
a
d
e
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
on
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
g
e
o
d
e
c
k
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
a
t
th
e
c
o
r
n
e
r
o
f
4
4
t
h
S
t
N
W
a
n
d
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Ro
a
d
.
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
mo
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
1
0
y
e
a
r
s
.
-
1
4
3
,
5
9
7
14
3
,
5
9
7
1
4
3
,
3
7
4
1
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
1
9
8
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
1
-
y
e
a
r
p
l
a
n
t
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
d
a
t
e
ha
s
b
e
e
n
c
h
a
n
g
e
d
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
i
s
.
6
CP
0
9
0
9
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
St
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
Hi
l
l
s
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
me
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
-
2
,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2
,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
4
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Fi
n
a
l
S
C
A
D
A
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
b
y
th
e
S
C
A
D
A
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
t
a
r
t
u
p
a
n
d
te
s
t
i
n
g
w
i
l
l
b
e
g
i
n
i
n
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
7
C2
0
7
A
'A
'
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
an
d
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
th
e
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
‘
A
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
NW
f
r
o
m
1
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
s
o
u
t
h
t
o
3
r
d
St
r
e
e
t
N
W
.
-
1
,
2
0
2
,
5
2
6
(1
0
2
a
n
d
T
I
F
)
40
5
,
9
9
3
1
2
,
1
8
8
6
,
5
8
0
,
7
4
0
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
s
)
1,
2
8
5
,
1
7
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
I
n
-
Ki
n
d
)
40
7
,
5
6
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
9,
8
9
4
,
1
7
7
9
,
6
5
4
,
0
0
9
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
1
9
4
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
G
a
u
b
Ro
a
d
w
a
y
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
r
o
m
3
r
d
t
o
5
t
h
i
s
op
e
n
t
o
l
o
c
a
l
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
l
y
.
W
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
l
y
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
e
x
c
e
p
t
i
o
n
o
f
f
i
n
a
l
La
n
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
a
n
d
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
w
h
i
c
h
i
s
no
t
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
Oc
t
o
b
e
r
.
8
CP
1
1
1
6
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
L
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
te
a
l
l
i
g
h
t
s
t
h
a
t
h
a
v
e
r
e
a
c
h
e
d
t
h
e
e
n
d
o
f
th
e
i
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
l
i
f
e
w
i
t
h
l
i
g
h
t
s
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
t
h
e
cu
r
r
e
n
t
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
.
-
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
(L
R
F
B
o
n
d
)
48
5
,
0
0
0
4
8
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
7
7
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
W
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
,
w
a
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
de
l
i
v
e
r
y
f
o
r
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
9
l
i
g
h
t
s
o
n
S
a
f
e
w
a
y
pa
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
a
r
e
a
.
9
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
ac
a
d
e
m
y
d
r
i
v
e
S
e
,
3
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
,
an
d
3
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
.
-
23
2
,
4
0
0
2
3
2
,
4
0
0
2
1
9
,
0
9
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
7
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
L
e
e
W
o
r
k
o
n
3
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
t
e
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
g
i
n
i
n
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
7
DI.E Page 160 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
10
C5
2
4
A
SC
A
D
A
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
SC
A
D
A
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
m
e
e
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
go
a
l
s
.
-
2
,
6
6
6
,
2
0
0
1
,
9
9
4
,
5
0
0
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
5
,
6
7
4
,
7
0
0
4
,
9
9
8
,
5
1
2
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
0
9
7
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
L
e
e
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
.
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
r
e
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
a
t
M&
O
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
1
te
s
t
s
i
t
e
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
1
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
n
d
1
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
i
n
S
e
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
.
11
CP
1
1
0
3
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
In
t
e
r
t
i
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
o
n
1
3
2
n
d
Av
e
S
E
a
n
d
t
h
e
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
f
o
r
th
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
pu
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
.
-
1
,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1,
2
9
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
2
7
5
,
6
3
8
1
0
0
%
F
e
b
-
1
2
6
9
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
w
h
i
l
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
o
f
Ta
c
o
m
a
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
s
t
h
e
i
r
n
e
x
t
s
t
a
g
e
o
f
wo
r
k
.
12
CP
1
2
0
6
20
1
2
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
,
an
d
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pa
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
c
h
i
p
s
e
a
l
s
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
w
o
r
k
on
b
o
t
h
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
l
st
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
-
1
,
3
0
0
,
0
0
0
5
3
9
,
5
0
0
(S
O
S
)
1,
8
3
9
,
5
0
0
1
,
8
3
9
,
5
0
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
5
5
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
c
o
m
b
i
n
e
s
t
h
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
2
0
1
2
SO
S
n
o
n
-
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
2
0
1
2
ar
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
p
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
.
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
w
i
t
h
p
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
i
n
pr
o
g
r
e
s
s
.
13
CP
0
9
2
1
Bi
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
&
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
sa
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
m
a
n
h
o
l
e
s
,
pi
p
e
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
-
1
1
7
,
0
0
0
8
3
5
,
6
3
5
5
,
0
0
0
9
5
7
,
6
3
5
8
5
3
,
9
8
5
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
4
5
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
L
e
e
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
8
7
2
,
3
7
2
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
)
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
14
C2
0
1
A
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
(
G
r
a
d
e
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
d
e
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
‘
M
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Bu
r
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
a
n
t
a
F
e
St
a
m
p
e
d
e
P
a
s
s
R
a
i
l
l
i
n
e
i
n
P
h
a
s
e
1
an
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
B
l
a
c
k
Di
a
m
o
n
d
R
o
a
d
B
y
p
a
s
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
fu
t
u
r
e
p
h
a
s
e
.
-
5
,
1
6
6
,
5
6
0
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
M
S
I
B
)
2,
8
5
6
,
6
1
1
(T
I
B
)
1,
3
3
5
,
0
7
9
(K
i
n
g
C
t
y
)
1,
5
4
2
,
8
0
0
(P
o
r
t
s
)
47
8
,
0
0
0
(B
N
S
F
)
1,
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
(R
E
E
T
2
)
2,
7
7
2
,
7
5
2
(P
W
T
F
)
22
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
2
2
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
3
8
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
o
a
d
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Fe
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
6
t
h
St
r
e
e
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
o
p
e
n
t
o
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
a
n
d
t
h
e
4t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
w
i
l
l
b
e
o
p
e
n
e
d
t
o
tr
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
3
1
s
t
.
15
EM
0
9
0
2
Te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
B
a
r
r
i
e
r
Re
m
o
v
a
l
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
m
o
v
e
t
h
e
5
m
i
l
e
s
o
f
te
m
p
o
r
a
r
y
b
a
r
r
i
e
r
s
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
i
n
2
0
0
9
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
t
h
e
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
f
o
r
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
f
r
o
m
th
e
d
i
m
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
o
f
t
h
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
Ha
n
s
o
n
D
a
m
.
-
2
,
1
4
0
,
6
9
4
(K
C
F
C
D
)
2,
1
4
0
,
6
9
4
2
,
1
2
9
,
2
2
2
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
2
5
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
t
m
u
l
t
i
p
l
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
a
s
i
g
i
n
i
f
i
c
a
n
t
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
l
k
b
a
g
s
re
m
o
v
e
d
t
o
d
a
t
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
e
a
s
t
s
i
d
e
a
n
d
th
e
w
e
s
t
s
i
d
e
s
o
u
t
h
o
f
D
y
k
s
t
r
a
P
a
r
k
.
16
CP
1
1
1
2
20
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
t
va
r
i
o
u
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
-
2
3
5
,
0
0
0
(3
2
8
)
23
5
,
0
0
0
2
2
9
,
3
2
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
2
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
17
CP
1
2
1
6
20
1
2
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
C
r
a
c
k
S
e
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
c
r
a
c
k
s
e
a
l
i
n
g
on
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
a
n
d
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
ou
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
-
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
20
0
,
0
0
0
1
7
5
,
3
2
4
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
P
r
e
-
c
o
n
i
s
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
f
o
r
S
e
p
t
.
1
1
t
h
.
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
7
DI.E Page 161 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
18
CP
1
2
1
1
Do
w
n
t
o
w
n
S
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
G
a
r
d
e
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
a
n
a
n
n
u
a
l
l
y
r
o
t
a
t
i
n
g
sc
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
g
a
r
d
e
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
T
h
i
s
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
p
t
o
1
0
fo
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
c
u
l
p
t
u
r
e
s
a
s
t
h
e
bu
d
g
e
t
a
l
l
o
w
s
.
A
r
t
s
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
b
e
i
n
g
do
n
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
t
h
e
A
r
t
s
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
s
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
.
-
7
0
,
4
8
4
(L
R
F
)
10
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
e
r
a
l
fu
n
d
)
80
,
4
8
4
8
0
,
4
8
4
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
W
o
r
k
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
w
t
h
w
e
e
k
i
f
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
1
0
t
h
.
19
CP
1
1
0
8
20
1
1
/
1
2
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
o
n
d
Cl
e
a
n
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
of
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
8
s
t
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
po
n
d
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
a
n
d
cl
e
a
n
t
h
e
d
i
t
c
h
a
l
o
n
g
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
/
E
a
s
t
Va
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
.
1
36
0
,
0
0
0
3
6
0
,
0
0
0
3
3
5
,
8
0
0
9
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
3
L
e
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
i
s
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
i
s
wo
r
k
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
s
u
m
m
e
r
o
f
2
0
1
3
d
u
e
t
o
wa
t
e
r
l
e
v
e
l
s
.
20
CP
0
9
0
9
Ac
a
d
e
m
y
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
wa
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
fl
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
1
3
,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3,
0
4
1
,
0
3
1
3
,
0
2
2
,
5
0
0
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
O
c
t
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
d
u
p
o
n
D
e
p
t
.
o
f
He
a
l
t
h
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
t
o
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
.
21
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
Tr
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
L
i
n
e
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
a
la
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
li
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
S
i
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
Ho
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
1
1
,
9
4
6
,
6
9
7
8
3
1
,
9
0
4
2
,
7
7
8
,
6
0
1
2
,
7
5
0
,
7
6
0
9
7
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
M
a
r
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
d
u
r
i
n
g
th
e
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
pa
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
f
u
n
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
T
r
u
s
t
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
W
e
l
l
1
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
al
s
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
l
i
n
e
o
n
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
pa
r
t
i
a
l
l
y
f
u
n
d
e
d
w
i
t
h
a
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
T
r
u
s
t
Fu
n
d
L
o
a
n
.
22
CP
1
2
1
5
Ba
n
n
e
r
P
o
l
e
F
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
a
i
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
f
o
u
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
of
t
h
e
b
a
n
n
e
r
p
o
l
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
t
h
e
N
E
co
r
n
e
r
o
f
E
M
a
i
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
B
S
t
r
e
e
t
NE
.
1
3
0
,
0
0
0
(3
2
8
)
30
,
0
0
0
3
0
,
0
0
0
6
5
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
N
o
v
-
1
2
T
r
u
o
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
23
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
H
i
-
C
r
e
s
t
Dr
i
v
e
N
W
1
16
5
,
0
0
0
1
6
5
,
0
0
0
1
7
8
,
3
1
0
3
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
A
u
g
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
b
u
t
i
s
n
o
t
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
t
h
i
s
ye
a
r
.
24
CP
1
1
2
0
Le
a
H
i
l
l
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
to
H
a
z
e
l
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
.
,
L
e
a
H
i
l
l
e
l
e
m
.
,
an
d
R
a
i
n
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
l
o
n
g
1
1
6
t
h
Av
e
.
S
E
a
n
d
S
E
3
1
2
S
t
.
1
3
9
8
,
5
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
21
,
5
9
7
(
A
S
D
)
42
0
,
0
9
7
4
2
0
,
0
9
7
3
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
3
t
o
b
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
su
m
m
e
r
.
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
A
S
D
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
r
po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
25
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
W
e
l
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
W
e
l
l
1
s
o
t
h
a
t
i
t
c
a
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
t
f
u
l
l
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
th
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
1
2
,
4
7
6
,
5
6
8
2,
4
7
6
,
5
6
8
2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
u
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
i
n
20
1
3
.
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
7
DI.E Page 162 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
26
CP
1
1
0
7
Fu
l
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
Th
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
1
A
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
in
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
F
u
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
ar
e
a
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
an
d
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
th
e
f
u
l
l
w
a
t
e
r
r
i
g
h
t
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
1
B
w
i
l
l
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
as
w
e
l
l
a
s
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
Ph
a
s
e
2
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
9
7
,
3
6
4
2
8
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
L
a
m
o
t
h
e
Th
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
P
h
a
s
e
1
A
on
l
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
i
s
p
h
a
s
e
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
an
d
p
u
m
p
t
e
s
t
d
a
t
a
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
.
27
CP
1
1
1
8
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
t
o
F
i
r
St
r
e
e
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
is
l
a
n
d
,
a
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
m
i
d
-
0
b
l
o
c
k
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
,
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
po
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
si
g
n
a
l
a
t
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
al
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
1
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
4
0
,
8
3
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
94
0
,
8
3
0
9
4
0
,
8
3
0
1
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
is
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
28
CP
1
1
1
9
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
F
i
r
S
t
.
S
E
t
o
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
S
E
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
w
i
d
e
n
A
W
S
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Fi
r
a
n
d
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
r
o
m
3
l
a
n
e
s
to
5
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
st
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
1
8
4
9
2
,
4
2
6
,
4
0
0
(T
I
B
)
60
6
,
6
0
0
(M
I
T
)
3,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
3
,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
1
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
st
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
an
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
e
w
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
29
CP
1
0
2
4
AW
S
a
n
d
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
on
l
y
f
o
r
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
O
p
t
i
o
n
2
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
th
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
s
a
f
e
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
2
8
0
,
0
0
0
80
,
0
0
0
7
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
5
%
A
u
g
-
1
3
T
B
D
T
r
u
o
n
g
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
In
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
fo
r
e
a
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
A
W
S
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
o
n
t
o
M
S
t
.
S
E
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
17
t
h
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
fr
o
m
1
7
t
h
t
o
M
.
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
P
r
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
-
P
r
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
co
n
f
i
g
u
r
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
f
o
o
t
p
r
i
n
t
o
f
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
a
n
d
O
p
t
i
o
n
2
w
a
s
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
.
F
i
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
be
g
i
n
n
i
n
g
b
u
t
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
o
n
s
e
c
u
r
i
n
g
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
.
30
CP
0
7
6
5
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
an
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
2
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
5
%
J
u
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
th
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
31
CP
0
6
2
4
We
l
l
5
U
p
g
r
a
d
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
w
e
l
l
fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
e
m
e
r
g
e
n
c
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
an
d
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
c
a
p
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
.
3
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
75
1
,
9
0
0
7
5
1
,
9
0
0
0
%
J
a
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
sc
o
p
i
n
g
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
32
C5
1
2
A
We
l
l
4
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
h
o
u
s
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
b
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
,
di
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
,
a
n
d
r
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
fa
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
s
t
a
f
f
.
3
7
4
7
,
1
3
8
74
7
,
1
3
8
1
,
2
4
1
,
2
8
8
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
S
e
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
33
CP
0
9
0
6
20
0
9
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
i
g
n
a
t
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
an
d
L
a
k
e
T
a
p
p
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
3
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
F
u
n
d
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
L
e
e
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
on
h
o
l
d
.
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
7
DI.E Page 163 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
34
C2
2
9
A
BN
S
F
/
E
V
H
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
b
o
t
h
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
(
A
S
t
S
E
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
N
S
F
r
a
i
l
tr
a
c
k
s
j
u
s
t
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
.
3
3
8
5
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
38
5
,
0
0
0
9
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
n
h
o
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
B
N
S
F
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
,
an
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
CP
S
T
O
T
A
L
9
,
0
6
3
,
5
3
2
1
8
,
9
5
3
,
5
0
9
5
,
7
8
5
,
7
0
4
5
,
7
2
7
,
0
6
3
4
3
,
2
9
0
,
9
2
8
8
2
,
8
2
0
,
7
3
6
8
8
,
5
8
3
,
9
9
3
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
7
DI.E Page 164 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
d
s
(
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
35
CP
1
1
0
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
an
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
Th
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
1
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
pa
t
c
h
i
n
g
a
n
d
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
o
f
c
o
n
c
r
e
t
e
a
n
d
as
p
h
a
l
t
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
1
,
8
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
4
9
3
,
3
4
9
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
1
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
36
CP
1
1
2
1
20
1
1
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
P
h
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
i
n
an
d
a
r
o
u
n
d
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
d
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
a
r
e
a
.
Th
i
s
P
h
a
s
e
2
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
t
h
e
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
6
t
h
P
l
N
E
o
f
f
o
f
6
t
h
S
t
,
2n
d
S
t
.
N
E
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
R
S
t
a
n
d
O
S
t
,
H
S
t
SE
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
2
n
d
S
t
.
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
,
a
n
d
G/
3
r
d
S
t
S
W
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
M
a
i
n
a
n
d
E
S
t
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
0
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
1
,
9
6
8
,
3
0
7
1
,
5
2
6
,
6
2
1
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
F
i
n
a
l
P
a
y
m
e
n
t
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
2,
8
2
1
,
0
0
0
3
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
4
2
5
,
4
0
0
-
3
,
7
6
8
,
3
0
7
3
,
0
1
9
,
9
7
0
37
CP
1
2
0
1
20
1
2
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
J
S
t
S
E
b
t
w
n
2
n
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
2
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
E
b
t
w
n
M
a
n
d
R
S
t
.
S
E
2
7
t
h
/
H
/
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
E
a
s
t
o
f
F
S
t
.
S
E
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
m
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
be
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
1,
6
8
9
,
5
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
2
,
3
0
8
,
0
8
0
1
,
5
6
4
,
7
2
7
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
2
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
t
t
h
e
2
2
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
a
n
d
28
t
h
/
H
/
2
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
Ot
h
e
r
S
O
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
CP
1
2
0
6
,
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
Se
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
.
20
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
F
o
r
s
t
a
t
u
s
s
e
e
C
P
1
2
0
6
1,
8
8
9
,
5
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
2
,
5
0
8
,
0
8
0
1
,
7
6
4
,
7
2
7
20
1
1
&
2
0
1
2
T
O
T
A
L
S
O
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
4
,
7
1
0
,
5
8
0
8
4
1
,
9
0
0
1
8
0
,
0
0
7
5
4
3
,
9
0
0
-
6
,
2
7
6
,
3
8
7
4
,
7
8
4
,
6
9
7
20
1
1
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
S
u
b
t
o
t
a
l
s
SO
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
7
DI.E Page 165 of 168
Da
t
e
:
Au
g
u
s
t
2
8
,
2
0
1
2
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
St
a
f
f
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Ac
t
i
o
n
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
St
a
t
u
s
A
CP
1
2
1
0
Au
b
u
r
n
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
u
m
a
n
e
S
o
c
i
e
t
y
S
i
t
e
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
l
o
t
,
a
c
c
e
s
s
,
w
a
t
e
r
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
n
d
s
e
w
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
'
s
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
4
9
1
0
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
a
s
re
q
u
i
r
e
d
f
o
r
t
h
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
a
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
A
u
b
u
r
n
Va
l
l
e
y
H
u
m
a
n
e
S
o
c
i
e
t
y
.
1
7
9
,
4
9
0
1
6
3
,
6
3
5
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
1
8
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
M
S
C
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
B
MS
0
8
0
2
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
R
o
o
f
E
l
a
s
t
o
m
e
r
i
c
C
o
a
t
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
o
o
f
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
Ai
r
p
o
r
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
a
s
n
e
e
d
e
d
.
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
1
2
5
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
2
6
0
%
A
u
g
-
1
2
B
u
r
k
e
M
S
C
Wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
n
d
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
8/
3
1
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
C
CP
1
1
1
5
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
N
W
P
l
a
z
a
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
t
h
e
N
W
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
Ha
l
l
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
c
e
n
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
n
e
w
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
A
D
A
R
a
m
p
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
an
d
n
e
w
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
4
7
5
,
9
7
7
4
5
8
,
5
7
0
9
9
%
T
B
D
T
B
D
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
l
y
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
m
a
y
b
e
p
u
t
on
h
o
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
t
h
e
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
o
f
t
h
e
I
c
o
n
i
c
P
a
v
i
l
i
o
n
Pr
o
p
o
s
a
l
s
.
D
CP
0
6
1
6
Wa
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
-
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
h
e
s
e
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
u
p
t
o
9
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
ar
e
a
.
1
0
1
,
0
0
0
1
1
6
,
0
5
0
7
5
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
PC
D
C
w
a
s
h
e
l
d
8
/
2
7
.
E
CP
1
0
1
6
Fe
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
n
e
w
l
e
v
e
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
on
t
h
e
F
e
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
.
6
3
9
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
6
5
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
N
/
A
A
p
r
-
1
4
A
n
d
e
r
s
e
n
P
C
D
C
Wo
r
k
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
is
f
r
o
m
3
G
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
m
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
f
u
n
d
s
.
A
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
$3
0
0
K
i
n
f
u
n
d
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
WI
R
A
9
i
n
t
h
e
h
i
g
h
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
y
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
f
u
n
d
wh
i
c
h
g
o
e
s
t
o
t
h
e
F
l
o
o
d
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
f
o
r
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
.
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
h
a
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
f
o
r
a
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
3
2
7
k
i
n
S
R
F
B
fu
n
d
i
n
g
w
h
i
c
h
w
o
n
'
t
b
e
f
i
n
a
l
i
z
e
d
u
n
t
i
l
t
h
i
s
f
a
l
l
,
w
h
i
c
h
w
a
s
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
W
I
R
A
9
i
n
A
u
g
u
s
t
.
P
r
e
-
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
T
O
T
A
L
O
T
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
1
,
5
9
5
,
5
6
7
2
,
1
2
8
,
2
5
5
T
o
t
a
l
B
u
d
g
e
t
OT
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
-
A
C
T
I
O
N
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
C
O
M
I
T
T
E
E
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
7
o
f
7
DI.E Page 166 of 168
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Action Tracking Matrix
Date:
August 29, 2012
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached matrix.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:September 4, 2012 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 167 of 168
No
.
It
e
m
De
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Co
n
t
a
c
t
Ne
x
t
PW
C
Re
v
i
e
w
Da
t
e
Es
t
.
Co
m
p
.
Da
t
e
S
t
a
t
u
s
A
St
r
e
e
t
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
(E
v
a
l
u
a
t
e
1
0
2
n
d
Pl
a
c
e
SE
Li
g
h
t
i
n
g
)
Pa
r
a
1
0
/
1
/
1
2
Fo
l
l
w
u
p
to
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
if
10
2
Pl
SE
me
e
t
s
po
l
i
c
y
fo
r
ad
d
i
n
g
li
g
h
t
s
to
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
PS
E
po
l
e
s
B
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
Sp
a
c
e
s
on
Ma
i
n
St
r
e
e
t
fo
r
Bo
a
r
d
w
a
l
k
Ga
u
b
/
P
a
r
a
1
0
/
1
/
1
2
Pu
b
l
i
c
Wo
r
k
s
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
‐
Ac
t
i
o
n
Tr
a
c
k
i
n
g
Ma
t
r
i
x
Up
d
a
t
e
d
:
8/
2
9
/
2
0
1
2
8:
4
1
AM
DI.F Page 168 of 168