HomeMy WebLinkAbout2688 r
Vito Wilk
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 6 8 8
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
3 WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN
AMENDMENT TO THE MILL CREEK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING
4 COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF AUBURN AND KENT EXTENDING THE
DURATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ONE YEAR (1) FROM THE
DATE OF ADOPTION
5
6 WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Auburn Resolution No 2299
7 the City Council authorized execution of the Mill Creek
8 Interlocal Agreement and identified development of a Mill
9 Creek Basin Flood Control Plan as a primary objective of that
10 Agreement; and
11 WHEREAS, the parties agreed to a one-year duration for
12 the 1992 Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement to cover the first
13 phase of work in the overall Mill Creek work program; and
14 WHEREAS, that one-year Mill Creek work program resulted
15 in completion in 1993 of Phase 1 of the Flood Control Plan,
16 which is a hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analysis and an
17 outlet benefits study; and
18 WHEREAS, the parties agreed in 1993 to an 18-month
19 extension of the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement through
20 December 31, 1994 in order to start Phase II of the Flood
21 Control Plan, which is a Feasibility Analysis of flood control
22 alternatives; and
23 WHEREAS, Phase II is currently in process and is
24 anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of 1996; and
25
26
Resolution No 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 1
1
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that it is now pertinent
2
to examine the comprehensive work program for the Mill Creek
3
Basin Flood Control Plan and to initiate the next phase of
4
work toward development of that plan; and
5
WHEREAS, Phase III of the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan
6
will begin immediately upon completion of Phase II in 1996;
7
and
8
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39 34 entitled the "Interlocal
9
Cooperation Act, " the parties as local governments are
10
authorized to execute agreements to permit them to make the
11
most efficient use of their powers to their mutual advantage
12
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
13
WASHINGTON, IN A REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH
14
RESOLVES THAT:
15
SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
16
Auburn, Washington, are herewith authorized to execute an
17
Amendment to the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement between King
18
County and the City of Auburn and the City of Kent extending
19
the duration of the Interlocal Agreement one (1) year from the
20
date of adoption A copy of said Amendment is attached hereto
21
and denominated as Exhibit "A"
22
SECTION 2 . The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
23
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
24
out the directives of this legislation.
25
26
Resolution No 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 2
1
DATED and SIGNED this 4th day of December, 1995
2
3
CITY OF AUBURN
4
5
6
7 CHARLES A BOOTH
MAYOR
8 ATTEST
9
10
11 Robin Wohlhueter,
City Clerk
12
13
14 APPROVED AS TO FORM
15 )14.110L
16 Q1.3
17 Michael J. Reynolds,
City Attorney
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Resolution No. 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 3
Al iENDMENT TO THE MILL CREEK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF AUBURN AND KENT
EXTENDING THE DURATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
ONE YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ADOPTION
This amendment extends the duration of the Mill Creek Interlocal
Agreement, originally adopted on June 30, 1992 by King County
and the Cities of Auburn and Kent (hereinafter referred to as the
PARTIES), by one year The work program and budget associated
with the additional work are set forth in Attachment A hereto All
changes to the existing agreement are contained in this amendment;
elements of the original agreement which are not addressed in this
amendment remain as stated in the original document.
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992 the PARTIES adopted the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement and
identified development of a Mill Creek Flood Control Plan as a primary objective of that
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agreed to a one-year duration for the 1992 Mill Creek Interlocal
Agreement to cover the first phase of work in the overall Mill Creek work program; and
WHEREAS, that one-year Mill Creek work program resulted in completion in 1993 of Phase I
of the Flood Control Plan, which is a hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analysis and an outlet
benefits study; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agreed in 1993 to an I8-month extension of the Mill Creek
Interlocal Agreement through December 31, 1994 in order to start Phase II of the Flood Control
Plan, which is a Feasibility Analysis of flood control alternatives; and
WHEREAS, Phase II is currently in progress and is anticipated to be completed in the first
quarter of 1996, and
WHEREAS, Phase III of the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan is proposed to use the results of
Phase II, the Feasibility Analysis, in order to conduct project design, environmental review, and to
start the permit process for a Mill Creek flood control project; and
WHEREAS, Phase HI will begin immediately upon completion of Phase II in 1996, and
WHEREAS, any work subsequent to 1995 toward completion of a Mill Creek Flood Control
Plan and eventual implementation of a flood control project in this basin cannot be initiated
without an extension of the interlocal agreement or negotiation of a new interlocal agreement to
outline a scope of work and cost-share arrangements; and
-1-
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed that it is now pertinent to examine the work program
for the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan and to initiate the next phase of work toward development
of that plan, and
WHEREAS, major work products, including a Draft Mill Creek Flood Control Plan, and other
interim work products will be brought to the Green River Basin Technical Committee for its
review during the term of this interlocal agreement extension.
NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES mutually agree to the following amendments to the
interlocal agreement:
Work Program, Budget, and Schedule
The PARTIES approve the work program, budget, and schedule attached as Attachment A hereto
and agree to secure adequate funding for all necessary Phase III Mill Creek work as part of their
jurisdiction's annual budget process.
Amendment or Termination
This agreement may be amended, altered, clarified or extended only by the expressed agreement
of all parties to the agreement pursuant to notification of each parties' legislative or executive
branch as required by each signatory to this agreement.
Amendments to this agreement will address work programs, schedules, and budgeting and will be
attached to and incorporated herein as necessary The next amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement is anticipated to be negotiated in late 1996 for continuation of work into 1997 and
beyond. All amendments will be reviewed by the Green River Basin Technical Committee prior
to the expiration of the existing agreement.
This agreement may be terminated by any of the PARTIES upon ninety days written notice. In
the event of termination, the PARTIES are each responsible for their one-third share of all costs
incurred up to the effective date of termination.
Duration
The duration of this agreement shall be one year from the amended date of adoption, to expire no
later than December 31, 1996 This duration is effective provided that the annual work programs
and budgets are approved in accordance with Sections 2 and 6 of the onginal agreement.
Effectiveness
This agreement shall become effective upon signature by all PARTIES to the agreement.
-2-
Approved As To Form.
King County 'rosecuting Attorney King County Executive
Date: Attest By
, 1, _tc
� ' ---t t 1.1 Iv w l L
City Attorney, ity of Auburn
Mayor, City of Auburn
Date Attest By
-
1/27141e) /
V City Attorney, City of Kent M'yor, City of Kent
k55'T
Date. Attest By
/IZ /qL2
SL:rsj5
10-95
-3-
"ATTACHMENT A"
MILL CREEK BASIN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT EXTENSION (JAN I. 1996-DEC 31,1996)
BUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM, for
PHASE II COMPLETION AND INITIATION OF PHASE III of the
MILL CREEK BASIN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN.
BUDGET ITEM
Staff Salaries and Benefits 56,835
Supervisory and Support Services 36,925
Consulting Services (a) 237,947
Supplies/miscellaneous 5,560
1996 TOTAL. $ 337,267
City contributions in 1996 (b): $ 107,422 apiece
King County's contribution: $ 122,423
NOTES
(a) Estimated 1996 consulting costs are detailed below and include $15,000 in additional funds to
replace expenditures in 1995 by King County as part of a downstream analysis of the Auburn
Racetrack. King County will provide this added revenue. In addition, consulting funds have
been increased in 1996 due to cost savings in staff salaries and benefits, and supervisory and
support services.
(b) Mill Creek costs will be shared equally by King County and the Cities of Auburn and Kent
($107,422 apiece), with King County funding the additional funds mentioned above, for a total
King County contribution of$122,423
WORK PROGRAM
TASK DESCRIPTION WORK PRODUCTS ESTIMATED
CONSULTING SERVICES COST
Complete Phase H. -Draft Flood Control Plan
-Feasibility Analysis No new costs
- Selected Preferred Flood Control Project
Initiate Phase III.
-Design Flood Control Project -Project Plans and Specifications
- Environmental Review 140,947
-Prepared Environmental Document(s) 70,000
-Assist in Permit Applications - Permits in process
- Finalize Draft Flood Control Plan - Final Mill Creek Flood Control Plan 10 000
17.947
TOTAL 1996 CONSULTING COSTS
KING COUNTY STAFF $ 237.947
Salaries and Benefits -Manage Contracts for Phase II and III
- Participate in Mill Creek SAMP
-Respond to requests
TOTAL 1996 STAFF COSTS. $ 56,835
SL:lbj9
10-95
OIARI FS n ROOTh. MAYOR ��� • ��■«■p■ AUBURN CITY ATTORNEY
Judith I 1 R.s, id City Nmmey Auburn it
Judith c ,w.m.n Assist(II c... ,vn,mu 25 West Main. Auburn,WA 98001
R,r.n C cull,■er.Rm(ecm,r Civil (206)931-3030 Criminal:(206)804-3108
haw,S.0ncrosk■. Pro•ccumr / Fax.(206)931 3053
BR' , C
'-shing1/40
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
) ss.
COUNTY OF KING )
I, Robin Wohlhueter, the duly appointed, qualified City Clerk of the City of
Auburn, a Municipal Corporation and Code City, situate in the County of King, State of
Washington, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
Resolution No 2688 of the resolutions of the City of Auburn, entitled "RESOLUTION
NO "
I certify that said Resolution No 2688 was duly passed by the Council and
approved by the Mayor of the said City of Auburn, on the 4th day of December, 1995
Witness my hand and the seal of the City of Auburn this 24th day of June, 1996
flaWnitaaff/(/t---
Robin Wohlhueter
City Clerk
City of Auburn
3t .;,. Green River Basin Program
fggel
/, 0a c L,d1 ! S c& c -yn J 01
(ri Ckl M ► )I Cy ?,e L It_A- re-v-
1
ii-N,0v✓ rquA_Pc 1 Al cv tr j ,kke,.
(�,��4.� oche) c'lf'v ks ct-liCz. 4-0.1,,\_
l.,p ( i.11 k e„:41_y L kt S �iei
Iy ,,zv - hoe .,vac IOc>(,()
'4'4 iv, ,
King caa*y AYEivn Kant hgn LM6
CITY OF ; 1\ 4
Jim White, Mayor
January 22, 1996
'EYE — _
rte 2
-
Ms Stephanie Lucash
King County Surface Water Management
700 Fifth Avenue #2200
Seattle, Washington 98104
RE. Amendment to the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement
Dear Stephanie:
Enclosed for your files, is a fully executed copy of the Amendment to the Mill
Creek Interlocal Agreement between King County and the City of Auburn and Kent,
extending the duration of the interlocal agreement one year from the date of
adoption.
If you have any questions, please call me at 859-3078
Sincerely,
William S Wolinski, P E.
Supervisor Environmental Engineering
220 ap, 1\'1, sn /KENT.\\ASIII.\UTON•w0" TELF:PHO�C CllI. -;00/FAN s50.7—u
CITY OF AUBURN
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO Caroline Bergt, Contract Manager
FROM: Robin Wohlhueter, City Clerk
SUBJECT Resolution No. 2688
Amendment to Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement
DATE. December 11, 1995
The Auburn City Council adopted Resolution No 2688 at the December 4th City
Council meeting. This resolution authorizes the execution of an Amendment to
the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement between King County and the cities of
Auburn and Kent.
Attached is a copy of Resolution No 2688 together with the original Amendment
to the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement. The Amendment has been executed by
the City of Auburn and now requires execution by King County and the city of
Kent. Please obtain the necessary signatures on the Amendment and return a
fully executed Amendment to me for filing with Resolution 2688.
Thank you for your assistance
cc: Frank Currie, Public Works Director
Mike Reynolds, City Attorney
File: Al 3
f\clerk\co nt\R E S2688
Loo& atai ;
W 4) -
WinriI
1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 6 8 8
2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
3 WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN
AMENDMENT TO THE MILL CREEK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN KING
4 COUNTY AND THE CITIES OF AUBURN AND KENT EXTENDING THE
DURATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT ONE YEAR (1) FROM THE
DATE OF ADOPTION.
5
6 WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Auburn Resolution No 2299
7 the City Council authorized execution of the Mill Creek
8 Interlocal Agreement and identified development of a Mill
9 Creek Basin Flood Control Plan as a primary objective of that
10 Agreement; and
11 WHEREAS, the parties agreed to a one-year duration for
12 the 1992 Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement to cover the first
13 phase of work in the overall Mill Creek work program; and
14 WHEREAS, that one-year Mill Creek work program resulted
15 in completion in 1993 of Phase 1 of the Flood Control Plan,
16 which is a hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analysis and an
17 outlet benefits study; and
18 WHEREAS, the parties agreed in 1993 to an 18-month
19 extension of the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement through
20 December 31, 1994 in order to start Phase II of the Flood
21 Control Plan, which is a Feasibility Analysis of flood control
22 alternatives; and
23 WHEREAS, Phase II is currently in process and is
24 anticipated to be completed in the first quarter of 1996; and
25
26
Resolution No. 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 1
1
WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that it is now pertinent
2
to examine the comprehensive work program for the Mill Creek
3
Basin Flood Control Plan and to initiate the next phase of
4
work toward development of that plan; and
5
WHEREAS, Phase III of the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan
6
will begin immediately upon completion of Phase II in 1996;
7
and
8
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 39 34 entitled the "Interlocal
9
Cooperation Act, " the parties as local governments are
10
authorized to execute agreements to permit them to make the
11
most efficient use of their powers to their mutual advantage
12
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
13
WASHINGTON, IN A REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH
14
RESOLVES THAT
15
SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
16
Auburn, Washington, are herewith authorized to execute an
17
Amendment to the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement between King
18
County and the City of Auburn and the City of Kent extending
19
the duration of the Interlocal Agreement one (1) year from the
20
date of adoption A copy of said Amendment is attached hereto
21
and denominated as Exhibit "A" .
22
SECTION 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
23
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
24
out the directives of this legislation.
25
26
Resolution No. 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 2
1
DATED and SIGNED this 4th day of December, 1995
2
3
CITY OF AUBURN
4
5
6
Qttkidts. Bat
7 CHARLES A. BOOTH
MAYOR
8 ATTEST
9
10
11 Robin Wohlhueter,
City Clerk
12
13
14 APPROVED AS TO FORM
15 )tata
16
Q.1/4&
17 Michael J. Reynolds,
City Attorney
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Resolution No. 2688
November 21, 1995
Page 3
AMENDMENT TO THE MILL CREEK INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CI I ES OF AUBURN AND KENT
EXTENDING THE DURATION OF THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
ONE YEAR FROM IRE DATE OF ADOPTION
This amendment extends the duration of the Mill Creek Interlocal
Agreement, originally adopted on June 30, 1992 by King County
and the Cities of Auburn and Kent(hereinafter referred to as the
PARTIES), by one year The work program and budget associated
with the additional work are set forth in Attachment A hereto All
changes to the existing agreement are contained in this amendment;
elements of the original agreement which are not addressed in this
amendment remain as stated in the original document.
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992 the PARTIES adopted the Mill Creek Interlocal Agreement and
identified development of a Mill Creek Flood Control Plan as a primary objective of that
agreement; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agreed to a one-year duration for the 1992 Mill Creek Interlocal
Agreement to cover the first phase of work in the overall Mill Creek work program; and
WHEREAS, that one-year Mill Creek work program resulted in completion in 1993 of Phase I
of the Flood Control Plan, which is a hydrologic and hydraulic modeling analysis and an outlet
benefits study; and
WHEREAS, the PARTIES agreed in 1993 to an 18-month extension of the Mill Creek
Interlocal Agreement through December 31, 1994 in order to start Phase II of the Flood Control
Plan, which is a Feasibility Analysis of flood control alternatives; and
WHEREAS, Phase H is currently in progress and is anticipated to be completed in the first
quarter of 1996; and
WHEREAS, Phase III of the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan is proposed to use the results of
Phase H, the Feasibility Analysis, in order to conduct project design, environmental review, and to
start the permit process for a Mill Creek flood control project; and
WHEREAS, Phase III will begin immediately upon completion of Phase II in 1996; and
WHEREAS, any work subsequent to 1995 toward completion of a Mill Creek Flood Control
Plan and eventual implementation of a flood control project in this basin cannot be initiated
without an extension of the interlocal agreement or negotiation of a new interlocal agreement to
outline a scope of work and cost-share arrangements; and
-1-
WHEREAS, the PARTIES have agreed that it is now pertinent to examine the work program
for the Mill Creek Flood Control Plan and to initiate the next phase of work toward development
of that plan; and
WHEREAS, major work products, including a Draft Mill Creek Flood Control Plan, and other
interim work products will be brought to the Green River Basin Technical Committee for its
review during the term of this interlocal agreement extension:
NOW, THEREFORE, the PARTIES mutually agree to the following amendments to the
interlocal agreement:
Work Program, Budget, and Schedule
The PARTIES approve the work program, budget, and schedule attached as Attachment A hereto
and agree to secure adequate funding for all necessary Phase III Mill Creek work as part of their
jurisdiction's annual budget process.
Amendment or Termination
This agreement may be amended, altered, clarified or extended only by the expressed agreement
of all parties to the agreement pursuant to notification of each parties' legislative or executive
branch as required by each signatory to this agreement.
Amendments to this agreement will address work programs, schedules, and budgeting and will be
attached to and incorporated herein as necessary The next amendment to the Interlocal
Agreement is anticipated to be negotiated in late 1996 for continuation of work into 1997 and
beyond. All amendments will be reviewed by the Green River Basin Technical Committee prior
to the expiration of the existing agreement.
This agreement may be terminated by any of the PARTIES upon ninety days written notice. In
the event of termination, the PARTIES are each responsible for their one-third share of all costs
incurred up to the effective date of termination.
Duration
The duration of this agreement shall be one year from the amended date of adoption, to expire no
later than December 31, 1996. This duration is effective provided that the annual work programs
and budgets are approved in accordance with Sections 2 and 6 of the original agreement.
Effectiveness
This agreement shall become effective upon signature by all PARTIES to the agreement.
-2-
Approved As To Form:
King County Prosecuting Attorney King County Executive
Date: Attest By
` I
6w 14 s 0, (8 ej()
City Attorney, City of Auburn Mayor, City of Auburn
Date: Attest By
J` 6eh
City Attorney, City of Kent Mayor, City of Kent
Date: Attest By
SL:rsj5
10-95
-3-
•
"ATTACHMENT A"
MILL CREEK BASIN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT EXTENSION (JAN 1, 1996-DEC 31,1996)
BUDGET AND WORK PROGRAM, for
PHASE II COMPLETION AND INITIATION OF PHASE III of the
MILL CREEK BASIN FLOOD CONTROL PLAN
BUDGET ITEM
Staff Salaries and Benefits 56,835
Supervisory and Support Services 36,925
Consulting Services (a) 237,947
Supplies/miscellaneous 5,560
1996 TOTAL. $ 337,267
City contributions in 1996 (b): $ 107,422 apiece
King County's contribution: $ 122,423
NOTES.
(a) Estimated 1996 consulting costs are detailed below and include$15,000 in additional funds to
replace expenditures in 1995 by King County as part of a downstream analysis of the Auburn
Racetrack. King County will provide this added revenue. In addition, consulting funds have
been increased in 1996 due to cost savings in staff salaries and benefits, and supervisory and
support services.
(b) Mill Creek costs will be shared equally by King County and the Cities of Auburn and Kent
($107,422 apiece), with King County funding the additional funds mentioned above, for a total
King County contribution of$122,423
WORK PROGRAM ESTIMATED
TASK DESCRIPTION WORK PRODUCTS COST
CONSULTING SERVICES.
Complete Phase II. -Draft Flood Control Plan No new costs
-Feasibility Analysis - Selected Preferred Flood Control Project
Initiate Phase III:
-Design Flood Control Project -Project Plans and Specifications 140,947
-Environmental Review -Prepared Environmental Document(s) 70,000
-Assist in Permit Applications -Permits in process 10,000
-Finalize Draft Flood Control Plan -Final Mill Creek Flood Control Plan 17,000
TOTAL 1996 CONSULTING COSTS. $ 237,947
KING COUNTY STAFF
Salaries and Benefits -Manage Contracts for Phase II and III
-Participate in Mill Creek SAMP
-Respond to requests
TOTAL 1996 STAFF COSTS. _ $ 56,835
SL:lbj9
10-95