HomeMy WebLinkAbout2918 1 RESOLUTION NO 2 9 1 8
2
3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN
4 AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH KCM, INC FOR THE
b PURPOSE OF UPDATING THE CITY OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE
STORMWATER PLAN
6
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IN A
8 REGULAR MEETING DULY ASSEMBLED, HEREWITH RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS
9 Section 1. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of
10 Auburn are hereby authorized to execute an Agreement for
11 Professional Services with KCM, INC for the purpose of
12 updating the City' s Comprehensive Stormwater Plan A copy of
13 said Agreement is attached hereto, designated as Exhibit "A"
14 and incorporated by reference in this Resolution
15 Section 2 The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
16 such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry
17 out the directives of this legislation
18 DATED and SIGNED this 17th day of February, 1998
19
20 CITY OF AUBURN
21 Yin ``1 1d0c
22 CHARLES A BOOT
MAYOR
23
24
25
26
Resolution No 2918
February 11, 1998
Page 1
1�
1 ATTEST
2
3 )96-14 e 41S
Danielle E DasYam,
5 City Clerk
6
7
8 APPROVED AS TO FORM
9
11 Michael J Reynolds,
12 City Attorney
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Resolution No 2918
February 11, 1998
Page 2
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the CITY OF AUBURN, a
Municipal Corporation in King County, Washington, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and with
KCM, INC. a corporation whose address is 1917 First Avenue, Seattle Washington 98101-
1037, hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"
In consideration of the covenants and conditions of this Agreement, the parties hereby
agree as follows.
SCOPE OF WORK.
The consultant shall accomplish the scope of services presented in 'Exhibit A"
3. TERM.
Upon receipt from the CITY of written Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT shall
substantially complete the analysis required for Subbasin groupings V & HV AA, A, B & Z by
April 15 1998. The remainder of the scope of services shall be completed by June 30, 1998.
The term of this agreement shall extend through December 31, 1999
The CITY may extend the period of the time set forth above for completion of the items
of work upon written request from the CONSULTANT for such an extension due to delays
which are beyond their control.
3 COMPENSATION.
The compensation for these services to be paid to the CONSULTANT shall be on a time-
and-material basis. Compensation to CONSULTANT shall be "Direct Job Wages" times a factor
of 3 1 plus "Reimbursable Expenses" times a factor of 110 plus "Subconsultant Expenses" times
a factor of 115 An estimate of expenditures is included as "Exhibit B "
The compensation for these services will not exceed S 190,100.
4 RESPONSIBILITY OF CONSULTANT
, cs a9 tee cxhh.M
Agreement for Professional Services
Februar 9 1998
Page 1 of 9
The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality technical accuracy,
timely completion and the coordination of all studies, analysis, designs, drawings, specifications,
reports and other services performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement. The
CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct or revise any errors, omissions
or other deficiencies in its plans, designs, drawings, specifications, reports and other services
required. The CONSULTANT shall perform its services to conform to generally accepted
professional engineering standards and the requirements of the CITY
Any approval by the CITY under this Agreement shall not in any way relieve the
CONSULTANT of responsibility for the technical accuracy and adequacy of its services. Except
as otherwise provided herein, neither the CITY'S review, approval or acceptance of nor payment
for any of the services shall be construed to operate as a waiver of any rights under this
Agreement or of any cause of action arising out of the performance of this Agreement to the full
extent of the law
5 INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS.
The CONSULTANT shall indemnify and hold the CITY and its officers and employees harmless
from and shall process and defend at its own expense all claims, demands, or suits at law or
equity arising in whole or in part from the CONSULTANT's negligence or breach of any of its
obligations under this Agreement, provided that nothing herein shall require a CONSULTANT
to indemnify the CITY against and hold harmless the CITY from claims, demands or suits based
solely upon the conduct of the CITY their agents, officers and employees and provided further
that if the claims or suits are caused by or result from the concurrent negligence of(a) the
CONSULTANT's agents or employees and (b) the CITY their agents, officers and employees,
this indemnity provision with respect to (1) claims or suits based upon such negligence, (2) the
costs to the CITY of defending such claims and suits, etc shall be valid and enforceable only to
the extent of the CONSULTANT's negligence or the negligence of the CONSULTANT's agents
y
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 2 of 9
or employees. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement.
6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR/ASSIGNMENT.
The parties agree and understand that the CONSULTANT is an independent contractor
and not the agent or employee of the CITY and that no liability shall attach to the CITY by
reason of entering into this Agreement except as otherwise provided herein. The parties agree
that this Agreement may not be assigned in whole or in part without the written consent of the
CITY
7 INSURANCE.
CONSULTANT shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement,
commercial general liability insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to
property which may arise from or in conjunction with services provided to the CITY by the
CONSULTANT its agents, employees or subcontractors, under this Agreement. The
CONSULTANT agrees to provide commercial general liability insurance and shall maintain
liability limits of no less then ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per occurrence and ONE
MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000) general aggregate. The CONSULTANT shall also provide
and maintain professional liability coverage in the minimum liability limits of ONE MILLION
DOLLARS ($1,000,000) per claim and ONE MILLION DOLLARS (S1.000,000) aggregate.
The general liability coverage shall also provide that the CITY its officers. employees
and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects. Liability arising out of the
services or responsibilities performed by or under obligation of the CONSULTANT under the
terms of this Agreement. by the CONSULTANT its employees, agents and subcontractors.
Both the General liability and professional liability coverage shall provide that the
CONSULTANT's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the CITY its
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 3 of 9
officials, employees and agents. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the CITY, its
officials, employees or agents shall be excess to the CONSULTANT's insurance and shall not
contribute with it. Each insurance policy required by this section of the Agreement shall be
endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, or canceled except when thirty
(30) days prior written notice has been given to the CITY by certified mail return receipt
requested. All insurance shall be obtained from an insurance company authorized to do business
in the State of Washington. The CONSULTANT agrees to provide copies of the certificates of
insurance to the CITY specifying the coverage required by this section within 14 days of the
execution of this Agreement. The CITY reserves the right to require that complete, certified
copies of all required insurance policies be submitted to the CITY at any time. The CITY will
pay no progress payments under Section 3 until the CONSULTANT has fully complied with this
section.
8 NONDISCRIMINATION.
The CONSULTANT may not discriminate regarding any services or activities to which
this Agreement may apply directly or through contractual, hiring, or other arrangements on the
grounds of race, color creed, religion, national origin, sex, age, or where there is the presence of
any sensory, mental or physical handicap.
9 OWNERSHIP OF RECORDS AND DOCUMENTS.,
The CONSULTANT agrees that any and all drawings, computer discs, documents,
records, books, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and
materials as the CONSULTANT may have accumulated prepared or obtained as part of
providing services under the terms of this Agreement by the CONSULTANT shall belong to and
shall remain the property of the CITY OF AUBURN In addition, the CONSULTANT agrees to
maintain all books and records relating to its operation and concerning this Agreement for a
period of six (6) years following the date that this Agreement is expired or otherwise terminated.
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 4 of 9
/ .
The CONSULTANT further agrees that the CITY may inspect any and all documents held by the
CONSULTANT and relating to this Agreement upon good cause at any reasonable time within
the six (6) year period. The CONSULTANT also agrees to provide to the CITY at the CITY'S
request, the originals of all drawings, documents, and items specified in this Section and
information compiled in providing services to the CITY under the terms of this Agreement.
Reuse by the City of any of the drawings, computer discs, documents, records, books,
specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials on
extensions of this project or any other project without the written permission of the
CONSULTANT shall be at the CITY'S sole risk and the CITY agrees to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless the CONSULTANT from all claims, damage and expenses including attorney's
fees arising out of such unauthorized reuse of the CONSULTANTS drawings, computer discs,
documents, records, books, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other
information and materials by the CITY, its officials, employees, agents, or others that may obtain
the information from the CITY
10 TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT,
This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon twenty (20) days written notice
to the other party, and based upon any cause. In the event of termination due to the fault of
others) than the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT shall be paid by the CITY for services
performed to the date of termination.
Upon receipt of a termination notice under the above paragraph, the CONSULTANT
shall (1) promptly discontinue all services affected as directed by the written notice, and (2)
deliver to the CITY all data, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and such
other information and materials as the CONSULTANT may have accumulated, prepared or
obtained in performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process.
11 GENERAL PROVISIONS.
Agreement for Professional Ser^ices
Februar, 9 1998
Page 5 of 9
11 1 This Agreement shall be governed by the laws, regulations and ordinances of the
City of Auburn, the State of Washington, King County, and where applicable, Federal laws.
11.2. All claims, disputes and other matters in question arising out of or relating to, this
Agreement or the breach hereof, except with respect to claims which have been waived, will be
decided by a court of competent jurisdiction in King County Washington. Pending final
decision of a dispute hereunder the CONSULTANT and the CITY shall proceed diligently with
the performance of the services and obligations herein.
11.3 The CITY and the CONSULTANT respectively bind themselves, their partners,
successors. assigns, and legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement with respect to
all covenants to this Agreement.
11 4 This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between the CITY
and the CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements
either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by
both the CITY and the CONSULTANT
11.5 Should it become necessary to enforce any term or obligation of this Agreement,
then all costs of enforcement including reasonable attorneys fees and expenses and court costs
shall be paid to the substantially prevailing party
11 6. The CONSULTANT agrees to comply with all local, state and federal laws
applicable to its performance as of the date of this Agreement.
11 7 If any provision of this agreement is invalid or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions shall remain in force and effect.
Agreement for Professional Services a
February 9 1998
Page 6 of 9
CITY OF AUBURN
t 1E6 4 Bad
Charles A. Booth, Mayor
Date 17142
ATTEST
a 41,,
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM.
' I) ■
Michael J Reynolds, City Attorney
KCM, Inc.
BY /y t
Authorized Signature
abi-hoks MELD", P.D , r E.
Pfrint or Type Name
TITLE. Rt.! N C 11 PAL
Address Iq (7 1 1as AVE.
Address SE4ini, 1)R 9$i 01
Phone (Lob) 443 - Z54S
Fax # (wa) 443- 530t'
Federal Tax ID # q t - Den 400
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 7 of 9
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
County of King
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ard !i'i .74r'cow_e,
, is the person(s) who appeared bef e me, and said person(s)
acknowledged the he/she/they signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she/they was/were
authorize at xecutS the ins ument and acknowledged it as
the I�.t_ , of
/5 . corporation sole proprietorship, partnership,
L.L.C. or individual), to be the free and voluntary act of sudh party for the uses and purposes
mentioned in this instrument.
Dated -0,t %, /99?
G
-e_mmet_Ja. -2‘) .4.6„-
SHARON A. WEBB
STATE OF WASHINGTON Notary Pubic and foythe State of Washington
NOTARY-•-PUBLIC residing at Jea.2Z
WY COMMISSION WIRES 5-01-00 My appointment expires. &5-- D/ OU
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 8 of 9
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
)ss.
County of King
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Charles A. Booth and Danielle E. Daskam
were the persons who appeared before me, and said persons acknowledged that they signed this
instrument, on oath stated that they were authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged
it as the MAYOR and CITY CLERK of the CITY OF AUBURN to be the free and voluntary
act of such Jar:es for the uses and urposcs mentioned in this instrument.
Dated=- ♦ (� Sn�g
C •, ► L-b k
tin.e!c,9 Notary Public in ai,d for the Sta oft Washington
•Z•r rsuor .o • My appointment expires l 9 co
4147 a*007Aq, �1
Vi was - t
w an B IG at
s9�F 79 qq.'O,E' f
"^'nmpua'
REF H:\FORMS\FE054 (R 10/97)
Agreement for Professional Services
February 9 1998
Page 9 of 9
Exhibit A
City of Auburn
Update of Comprehensive Drainage Plan
Scope of Services - 9 Feb 98
Background: The City of Auburn completed a Comprehensive Drainage Plan in 1990.
The plan identified flooding problems throughout much of the City and, based on a
preliminary analysis, provided alternative solutions for eliminating the flooding
problems. Since 1990, there has been many activities affecting the original Drainage
Plan recommendations. This has caused Auburn to identify a need to update the 1990
Plan. The needed updates fall into the following categories:
1 Update 1990 basin plans by either
- documenting that no changes have occurred in a basin since 1990 affecting the
original recommendations
- documenting improvements that have already been implemented in some basins
- conducting new analysis and providing updated recommendations in basins
where new information has come available or development decisions made since
1990.
2. Add completed basin plans from annexation areas into Comprehensive Plan Update
(Boeing; Lakeland Hills; municipal airport)
3 Conduct new analysis and provide recommendations in annexation areas not
included previously in 1990 Plan (emphasis will be on "basin" tacilites, with
refinement to trunk system level-ot-detail).
Subbasms A, B, Z, AA, H, and HV have been identified by the City as having the
highest priority for the Plan Update. The following scope of services descnbes the tasks
and estimated level-of-effort for the initial phase of updating the Auburn
Comprehensive Drainage Plan, focusing on the above noted subbasins
Other subbasins and potential annexation areas will have a lesser level-ot-effort at this
time and will identify more detailed analysis needed for a future phase of work. In
addition, future work will include an analysis of funding, in coordination with the
City s rate structure consultant, development of a city-wide capital improvement
program, and compiling all basin reports into a Comprehensive Drainage Plan Update
document.
Task 1. Project Administration
This task includes project administration between KCM and the City, coordination of
subconsultants, and preparation of a project plan and monthly progress reports. ✓
1 1 Prepare a project plan to provide clear direction to team members at the start of the
project. A start-up meeting by the project team is included at the beginning of the
project to discuss issues and the project requirements for the final deliverable.
1.2 Monitor the project schedule and budget to ensure conformance with the project
contract.
1.3 Prepare progress reports to accompany monthly invoices.
Task 2. Subbasin Grouping V, HV
There have been many proposed changes/updates in Subbasins V and HV since
completion of the 1990 Plan. These changes include development of a wetland
mitigation site and compensatory flood storage area by the Port of Seattle, formation of
the I Street LID, extension of S. 277th Street, and related adjustments to areas suitable
for development. This task will document these proposed changes/updates and re-
evaluate the recommendations originally included in the 1990 Plan. The outstanding
issue for the City is whether the wetland mitigation site / compensatory storage area
can also serve as a stormwater detention facility
2.1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model. Obtain available information from the City,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, drainage complaints,
and the SWMM model from the 1990 Plan.
2.2 Verify / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasins V and HV will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and
the subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will
be documented and resolved in the data input tiles.
Once the SWMM input tiles have been verified, the models will be run to verity that the
results are consistent with the model results presented in the 1990 Plan. The 10-, 25-,
and 100-year return frequency storm events, assuming an SCS 24-hour duration Type
IA hyetograph distribution, will be modeled. Future land use, consistent with the
current zoning map for the City of Auburn, will be assumed for all computer runs. The
level-of-effort estimated for this sub-task assumes that the SWMM models for the
existing drainage networks in the subbasins are completely represented by the models
and minimal effort will be required by KCM to get them to run.
The 1990 Plan used Version 4.03 (February 1989) of the EPA's SWMM model, while this
analysis will be using Version 2.04 (March 1996) of the XP-SWMM model. The XP-
SWMM model is an upgraded version of the original SWMM model, and hence, model
results may differ Model results that differ from those presented in the 1990 Plan will
be documented.
2.3 Document Planned Projects/ Update SWMM Model. Document proposed changes and
updates since the 1990 Plan, including development of a wetland mitigation site by the
Port of Seattle, formation of the I Street LID, extension of S. 277th Street, development
of a compensatory flood storage area, and related adjustments to areas suitable for
development. Modify the XP-SWMM model for the subbasins as needed to reflect
these proposed changes.
2.4 Identify Problem Areas: Identity any problem areas that will still exist with the
proposed changes for these subbasins, as well as document that the combination of
proposed individual projects can be linked without creating new problems.
2.5 Evaluate Alternatives. Based on problem areas identified in the previous task,
evaluate up to two alternatives for eliminating the flooding problems on a basin-wide
basis. At this time the two alternatives envisioned for this area are joint use of the
Port's mitigation area or development of another site.
2.6 City / Project Team Meetings: Two project team meetings and a presentation to
Council are scheduled with the City to review completed work on identifying problems,
the initial evaluation of alternative solutions, and selection of the preferred alternative
for the subbasms.
2.7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation. Following the first progress meeting with the
City, the preferred alternative will be developed further to finalize costs, calculate
benefits on a per acre basis, and identify project implementation considerations.
2.8 Draft Chapter far Cmnprehensrve Plan Update. All analysis completed for the subbasins
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for these subbasins will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing.
Task 3. Subbasin AA
There have been proposed changes/updates in Subbasin AA since completion of the
1990 Plan. These changes primarily include land swaps, land conversion for wetlands
and development, and provisions for compensatory flood storage and stormwater
detention. This task will document these proposed changes/updates and re-evaluate
the recommendations originally included in the 1990 Plan.
3 1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model. Obtain available information from the City,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, drainage complaints;
and the SWMM model from the 1990 Plan.
3.2 Verify / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasins AA will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and the
subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will be
documented and resolved in the data input tiles.
Once the SWMM input tiles have been verified, the models will be run to verify that the„
results are consistent with the model results presented in the 1990 Plan. The 10-, 25-,
and 100-year return frequency storm events, assuming an SCS 24-hour duration Type
3
lA hyetograph distribution, will be modeled. Future land use, consistent with the
current zoning map for the City of Auburn, will be assumed for all computer runs. The
level-of-effort estimated for this sub-task assumes that the SWMM models for the
existing drainage networks in the subbasins are completely represented by the models
and minimal eftort will be required by KCM to get them to run.
The 1990 Plan used Version 4.03 (February 1989) of the EPA's SWMM model, while this
analysis will be using Version 2.04 (March 1996) of the XP-SWMM model. The XP-
SWMM model is an upgraded version of the original SWMM model, and hence, model
results may differ Model results that differ from those presented in the 1990 Plan will
be documented.
3.3 Document Planned Projects/ Update SWMM Model. Document proposed changes and
updates since the 1990 Plan. Modify the XP-SWMM model for the subbasin as needed
to reflect these proposed changes.
3 4 Wetland Assessment
This task describes preliminary wetland permitting assistance and on-site wetland
mitigation planning for a proposed regional detention facility in Subbasin AA on an
approximately 38-acre site located south of S. 277th Street and east of State Route 167
The wetland assessment will be conducted by KCM subconsultant Springwood
Associates, Inc. as part of the City s Comprehensive Plan update for this subbasin.
Subtasks assigned to Springwood include agency coordination and conceptual
mitigation design.
3 4 1 Site Analysis
This task includes reviewing background information and obtaining COE confirmation
of the wetland delineation (completed by others).
3 4 11 Review Background Information
Collect and review the existing Wetland Delineation Report, as well as other
existing information including topographic maps of the property, floodplain
maps, stream and stormwater drainage maps.
3 4.1.2 Confirm the Wetland Delineation
Site Visits: Springwood will conduct site visits with the City and regulatory
agency personnel to verity wetland boundaries and confirm the existing wetland
delineation.
Coordination. Springwood will coordinate with the City and agency personnel.
All communications will be documented in writing.
3.4.1.3 Preliminary Impact Assessment
This task includes preparing a preliminary assessment of impacts resulting from
construction of the proposed detention facility This task does not include a
formal functional assessment, which may be required for this project at a later
time.
Coordination: Coordinate with KCM for preliminary facility design.
4
Prepare preliminary impact assessment: Based on preliminary facility design
describe potential impacts from the proposed project by wetland type and
acreage.
3 4.2 Preliminary Wetland Mitigation Plan
3.4.2.1 Conceptual Design (50%)
Wetland Mitigation Design Criteria. Develop design criteria for the wetland
mitigation based on preliminary engineering design.
Determine Acceptable Mitigation Ratios: Review regulatory requirements for
mitigation and determine the replacement ratios for proposed mitigation
actions.
Conceptual Grading Design. Based on preliminary engineering design, prepare
a conceptual grading plan for in-house review
Conceptual Planting Design. Based on preliminary hydrology information,
prepare conceptual planting plans.
Preliminary Acreage Estimate: Prepare a preliminary estimate of mitigation
acreage to determine the necessity for additional otfsite mitigation.
Conce tual Miti_ation Desi n Memorandum. Document the assumptions,
design criteria, target mitigation ratios, mitigation concept, preliminary acreage
calculations, and anticipated offsite mitigation requirements (it any) in a design
memorandum for internal use and decision making.
Coordination: One meeting with KCM and City staff regarding mitigation
requirements and conceptual design development. One design meeting with
KCM.
3 4.2.2 Wetland Mitigation Master Plan
Draft Wetland Mitigation Master Plan Drawing Develop a Draft Wetland
Mitigation Master Plan showing proposed plant communities, plant species by
community, preliminary acreage estimates, and all potential mitigation activities
the City will undertake. Submit for internal team review
Final Wetland Mitigation Master Plan Drawing: Based on City and KCM review
comments, develop the Final Wetland Mitigation Master Plan. The plan will be
used in preliminary meetings with wetlands regulatory agencies.
Coordination. One meeting with KCM and City staff regarding the total
mitigation proposal plus miscellaneous communications.
3 4.3 Permit Assistance and Coordination
An Individual 404(b)(1) wetland permit application and State 401 Water Quality
Certiticate will be required for this protect State and local permits that may also be
required include the State Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA), a Shorelines Master
Permit, and permits administered by the City that are conditioned by the City Wetland
Management Regulations. Task 3.4.1 includes coordinating with agencies with
regulatory authority over wetlands and waters of the U.S. including the City, the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (COE), U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS);'
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology), Washington State Department of
5
Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) and Indian Tribes. All meetings and communications will
be documented in writing
3 4 3 1 Preliminary Wetland Mitigation Permitting
This task addresses preliminary meetings with agency personnel to review
potential impacts and proposed mitigation concepts. On the basis of comments
received, the mitigation design will be revised for permit submittal.
Individual agency mitigation review meetings: Individual meetings will be held
with key agencies to obtain early input and comment on proposed mitigation
actions. If appropriate, these meetings will be combined. This task assumes two
on-site field meetings and two office meetings. One additional meeting is
budgeted.
Coordination: Coordinate with KCM and City staff. One meeting with the
City/KCM is budgeted.
3.5 Identify Problem Areas: Identify any problem areas that will still exist with the
proposed changes for these subbasins, as well as document that the combination of
proposed individual projects are linked without creating new problems.
3.6 Evaluate Alternatives: Based on problem areas identified in the previous task,
evaluate up to three alternatives for eliminating the flooding problems on a basin-wide
basis. The evaluation of alternatives will first consider opportunities for "basin"
facilities.
3.7 City / Project Team Meetings Two project team meetings and presentation to
Council are scheduled with the City to review completed work on identifying problems,
the initial evaluation of alternative solutions, and selection of the preferred alternative
for the subbasins.
3.S Preferred Alternative Recommendation. Following the first progress meeting with the
City, the preferred alternative will be developed further to finalize costs and project
implementation considerations.
3.9 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All analysis completed for the subbasins
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for these subbasins will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing.
Task 4. Subbasin Grouping A, B, Z
The 1990 Plan recommended the diversion of stormwater from Subbasin B to Subbasin
E, and the development of additional stormwater detention through expansion of
existing facilities and construction of new facilities. Since 1990, the City has elected to
eliminate the stormwater diversion and to pursue alternative measures for solving flood
problems in Subbasin B. Alternative measures to be considered include new detention
facility sites through land purchases, maximizing infiltration and routing stormwater to
the south towards the Stuck River
6
In a separate project, KCM has already assembled available data for the subbasins,
verified and converted the SWMM models to XP-SWMM, and is making a preliminary
evaluation of the infiltration opportunities in the area. The following tasks pick-up and
continue the previous work.
4.1 Identify Problem Areas: Identity any problem areas that exist in the subbasin for
existing conditions, prior to evaluating different alternatives than were recommended
in the 1990 Plan.
4.2 Evaluate Alternatives: Based on problem areas identified in the previous task,
evaluate up to three alternatives for eliminating the flooding problems on a basin-wide
basis. The alternatives will focus on new detention facility sites through land
purchases, maximizing infiltration and routing stormwater to the south towards the
Stuck River
4 .3 City/Project Team Meetings: Two project team meetings and presentation to Council
are scheduled with the City to review completed work on identifying problems, the
initial evaluation of alternative solutions, and selection of the preferred alternative for
the subbasins.
4.4 Preferred Alternative Recommendation: Following the first progress meeting with the
City the preferred alternative will be developed further to finalize costs and project
implementation considerations.
4.5 Dralt Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All analysis completed for the subbasins
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for these subbasins will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing.
Task 5. Subbasin Grouping G, H, I
There have been proposed changes/updates in the Subbasins G, H and I since
completion of the 1990 Plan. These changes include 1990 recommended projects that
have already been implemented and ongoing drainage plan development for the
muuucipal airport. In addition, there are remaining elements from the 1990 Plan that
still need to be constructed.
5 1 Assemble Data /Maps / SWMM Model. Obtain available information from the City,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, drainage complaints;
and the SWMM model from the 1990 Plan.
5 2 Verify / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasins G, H and I will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and
the subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will
be documented and resolved in the data input files.
7
Once the SWMM input tiles have been verified, the models will be run to verity that the
results are consistent with the model results presented in the 1990 Plan. The 10-, 25-,
and 100-year return frequency storm events, assuming an SCS 24-hour duration Type
1A hvetograph distribution, will be modeled. Future land use, consistent with the
current zoning map for the City of Auburn, will be assumed for all computer runs. The
level-of-effort estimated for this sub-task assumes that the SWMM models for the
existing drainage networks in the subbasins are completely represented by the models
and minimal effort will be required by KCM to get them to run.
The 1990 Plan used Version 4.03 (February 1989) of the EPA's SWMM model, while this
analysis will be using Version 2.04 (March 1996) of the XP-SWMM model. The XP-
SWMM model is an upgraded version of the original SWMM model, and hence, model
results may differ Model results that differ from those presented in the 1990 Plan will
be documented.
5.3 Document Planned Projects /Update SWMM Model. Document proposed changes and
updates since the 1990 Plan. Modify the XP-SWMM model for the subbasin as needed
to reflect these proposed changes.
54 Identify Problem Areas: Identity any problem areas that will still exist with the
proposed changes for these subbasins, as well as document that the combination of
proposed individual projects are linked without creating new problems.
5.5 Evaluate Alternatives: Based on problem areas identified in the previous task,
evaluate up to three alternatives for eliminating the flooding problems on a basin-wide
basis. The evaluation of alternatives will first consider opportunities for "basin"
facilities.
5 6 City/Project Minn Meetings: Two project team meetings are scheduled with the City
to review completed work on identifying problems, the initial evaluation of alternative
solutions, and selection of the preferred alternative for the subbasins.
5 7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation. Following the first progress meeting with the
City the preferred alternative will be developed further to finalize costs and project
implementation considerations.
5.8 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update. All analysis completed for the subbasins
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for these subbasins will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing
Task 6. Subbasin Grouping C, CC
Recommendations in the 1990 Plan for the Subbasins C and CC are still appropriate, but
a plan update is needed to reflect new information for these subbasins. Since 1990,
there has been new development, and new information indicates that the subbasin
delineations need to modified from the 1990 Plan. The City believes that further
subdividing Subbasin C into two subbasins would better represent stormwater
conveyance in the area.
6 1 Assemble Data /Maps / S WMA/1 Model. Obtain available information from the City,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines; drainage complaints;
and the SWMM model from the 1990 Plan.
6.2 Veriij / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasins C and CC will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and
the subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will
be documented and resolved in the data input files.
Once the SWMM input tiles have been verified, the models will be run to verity that the
results are consistent with the model results presented in the 1990 Plan. The 10-, 25-,
and 100-year return frequency storm events, assuming an SCS 24-hour duration Type
lA hyetograph distribution, will be modeled. Future land use, consistent with the
current zoning map for the City of Auburn, will be assumed for all computer runs. The
level-of-effort estimated for this sub-task assumes that the SWMM models for the
existing drainage networks in the subbasins are completely represented by the models
and minimal effort will be required by KCM to get them to run.
The 1990 Plan used Version 4.03 (February 1989) of the EPA's SWMM model, while this
analysis will be using Version 2.04 (March 1996) of the XP-SWMM model. The XP-
SWMM model is an upgraded version of the original SWMM model, and hence, model
results may differ Model results that differ from those presented in the 1990 Plan will
be documented.
6.3 Document Planned / Ongoing Projects. Document proposed changes and updates
since the 1990 Plan. Modify the XP-SWMM model for the subbasin as needed to reflect
these proposed changes. If appropriate, subdivide Subbasin C into two subbasins.
6 4 Identify Problem Areas: Verify the problem areas identified in the 1990 Plan and
assess whether revising the subbasin boundaries has affected the problem identification
from the 1990 Plan.
6.5 Evaluate Alternatives: Based on problem areas identified in the previous task, verify
that the recommendations from the 1990 Plan are still appropriate. The level-of-effort
for this task assumes that changes to previous recommendations will not be needed.
6 6 City/Project Team Meetings: One project team meeting is scheduled with the City to
review completed work on identifying problems, the evaluation of alternative solutions,
and selection of the preferred alternative for the subbasm.
6.7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation Following the protect team meeting with the
City, the preferred alternative will be updated further to finalize costs and project
implementation considerations.
9
6.8 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All analysis completed for the subbasins
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written tor these subbasins will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing
Task 7 Subbasin D
Stormwater improvement projects for Subbasin D have been completed and no further
work is planned for this subbasin. No new work is proposed for this subbasin for the
Comprehensive Plan Update. This task will update the 1990 Plan chapter to show
which projects have been implemented.
7.1 Assemble Data /Projects: Obtain available information from the City, including but
not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; and
records/descriptions of projects implemented in the subbasin.
7.2 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update All analysis completed for the subbasin
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing.
Task 8. Subbasin E
Design and construction of stormwater improvement projects are currently underway
in Subbasin E. This task will update the 1990 Plan by using reports prepared as part of
the stormwater project development and implementation to document revised
hydraulic modeling, alternatives evaluation, and project selection.
8.1 Assemble Data / Projects: Obtain design development reports and
records/descriptions of projects implemented in the subbasin.
8.2 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All analysis completed for the subbasin
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing
Task 9 Subbasin F
Stormwater improvement projects for Subbasin F have been completed and no further
projects are planned tor this subbasin. No new work is proposed for this subbasin for
the Comprehensive Plan Update. This task will update the 1990 Plan chapter to show
which projects have been implemented.
9 1 Assemble Data / Projects: Obtain available information from the City, including but
not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, and
records/descriptions of projects implemented in the subbasin.
10
9.2 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All analysis completed for the subbasin
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing.
Task 10. Subbasin K
There have not been any changes in Subbasin K that require the recommendations of
the 1990 Plan to be verified or revised. Therefore, no new work is proposed for this
task.
10.1 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All previous analysis completed for the
subbasin will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan
update. The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan Update without any further editing.
Task 11. Subbasin L
There have not been any changes in Subbasin L that require the recommendations of
the 1990 Plan to be verified or revised. Therefore, no new work is proposed for this
task.
11.1 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All previous analysis completed for the
subbasin will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan
update. The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan Update without any further editing.
Task 12. Subbasin N
Stormwater improvement projects for Subbasin N have been completed since 1990 and
no further projects are planned tor this subbasin. No new work is proposed for this
subbasin for the Comprehensive Plan Update. This task will update the 1990 Plan
chapter to show which projects have been implemented
12.1 Assemble Data /Projects: Obtain available information from the City, including but
not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, and
records/descriptions of projects implemented in the subbasin.
122 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update All analysis completed for the
subbasin will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan
update. The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan Update without any further editing.
Task 13. Subbasin 0
ll
Recommendations from the 1990 Plan may be affected by the drainage plan currently
being developed for the municipal airport. The impact, if any, of the airport drainage
plan on the recommendations in the 1990 Plan for Subbasin 0 needs to be evaluated.
13 1 Assemble Data /Maps /SWMM Model. Obtain available information from the City,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; utility
record drawings tor storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, drainage complaints;
and the SWMM model from the 1990 Plan.
13.2 Verify / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasin 0 will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and the
subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will be
documented and resolved in the data input tiles.
Once the SWMM input files have been verified, the models will be run to verify that the
results are consistent with the model results presented in the 1990 Plan. The 10-, 25-,
and 100-year return frequency storm events, assuming an SCS 24-hour duration Type
I hvetograph distribution, will be modeled. Future land use, consistent with the
current zoning map for the City of Auburn, will be assumed for all computer runs. The
level-of-effort estimated for this sub-task assumes that the SWMM models for the
existing drainage networks in the subbasins are completely represented by the models
and minimal effort will be required by KCM to get them to run.
The 1990 Plan used Version 4.03 (February 1989) of the EPA's SWMM model, while this
analysis will be using Version 2.04 (March 1996) of the XP-SWMM model. The XP-
SWMM model is an upgraded version of the original SWMM model, and hence, model
results may differ Model results that differ from those presented in the 1990 Plan will
be documented.
13.3 Document Planned / Ongoing Projects: Document proposed changes and updates
since the 1990 Plan. Modify the XP-SWMM model for the subbasin as needed to reflect
these proposed changes. In particular, modify the model to include the drainage plan
being developed for the municipal airport.
13 4 Identify Problem Areas. Verify the problem areas identified in the 1990 Plan and
assess whether drainage from the municipal airport has affected the problem
identification from the 1990 Plan.
13.5 Evaluate Alternatives. Based on problem areas identified in the previous task, verify
that the recommendations from the 1990 Plan are still appropriate. The level-ot-effort
for this task assumes that changes to previous recommendations will be minor
13.6 City /Project Team Meetings. One project team meeting is scheduled with the City
to review completed work on identifying problems, the evaluation of alternative
solutions, and selection of the preferred alternative for the subbasin.
I2
13 7 Pre/erred Alternative Recommendation. Following the project team meeting with the
City, the preferred alternative will be updated further to finalize costs and project
implementation considerations.
13.8 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update: All work completed for the subbasin
will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan update.
The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the Comprehensive Plan
Update without any further editing
Task 14. Subbasin P
There have not been any changes in Subbasin P that require the recommendations of
the 1990 Plan to be verified or revised. Therefore, no new work is proposed for this
task.
141 Verify / Update Existing SWMM Model. The existing conditions input files for
Subbasin 0 will be verified using the storm drainage utility information and the
subbasin maps collected from the City to check for consistency Discrepancies will he
documented and resolved in the data input files.
14.2 Draft Chapter tor Comprehensive Plan Update: All previous analysis completed for the
subbasin will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan
update. The report written for this subbasin will become a chapter of the
Comprehensive Plan Update without any further editing.
Task 15. South Area - Boeing
Separate from the City s 1990 Plan, a drainage plan has been prepared for the Boeing
site within the South Annexation Area. The Boeing plan will be summarized and
included in the Auburn Comprehensive Plan Update.
15.1 Assemble Data / Projects: Obtain the drainage plan developed for the Boeing site
within the South Annexation Area and summarize the analysis and recommendations
contained in the plan.
15.2 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update. All analysis completed for the Boeing
site will be documented in a format consistent with the final comprehensive plan
update. The report written for this site will become a chapter of the Comprehensive
Plan Update without any further editing
Task 16. White River West Area - Lakeland Hills
Separate from the City's 1990 Plan, a drainage plan has been prepared for the Lakeland
Hills development within the White River West Annexation Area. The Lakewood Hills
drainage plan will be summarized and included in the Auburn Comprehensive Plan
Update. The remainder of the White River West Annexation Area is scheduled for
similar development. The Comprehensive Plan Update will designate this area as a
13
"special study area" to be analyzed in the future when a development plan is proposed
to the City
16.1 Assemble Data/Projects: Obtain the drainage plan developed for the Lakeland Hills
development within the White River West Annexation Area and summarize the
analysis and recommendations contained in the plan.
16.2 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update All analysis completed for the
Lakeland Hills site will be documented in a format consistent with the final
comprehensive plan update. The report written for this site will become a chapter of
the Comprehensive Plan Update without any further editing.
Task 17 White River East Area
White River East is the designation given by Auburn to an area not previously included
in the 1990 Plan.
17.1 Assemble Data/Maps: Obtain available information from the City and King County,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, utility
record drawings tor storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines; and drainage
complaints.
17.2 Delineate Snbbasni Boundaries: Using available topographic maps, and other
information available from King County, delineate subbasin boundaries.
Task 18. Southeast Area
Southeast is the designation given by Auburn to an area not previously included in the
1990 Plan.
18.1 Assemble Data/Maps. Obtain available information from the City and King County,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; utility
record drawings tor storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, and drainage
complaints.
18.2 Delineate Subbasin Boundaries: Using available topographic maps, and other
information available from King County, delineate subbasin boundaries.
Task 19 Lea Hill South Area
Lea Hill South is the designation given by Auburn to an area not previously included in
the 1990 Plan.
19 1 Assemble Data/Maps. Obtain available information from the City and King County,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, and drainage
complaints.
11
19.2 Delineate Subbasin Boundaries: Using available topographic maps, and other
information available from King County, delineate subbasin boundaries.
Task 20. Lea Hill North Area
Lea Hill North is the designation given by Auburn to an area not previously included in
the 1990 Plan.
20.1 Assemble Data/Maps: Obtain available information from the City and King County,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps, utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines; and drainage
complaints.
20.2 Delineate Subbasin Boundaries: Using available topographic maps, and other
information available from King County, delineate subbasin boundaries.
Task 21. West Area
West is the designation given by Auburn to an area not previously included in the 1990
Plan.
21.1 Assemble Data/Maps: Obtain available information from the City and King County,
including but not limited to topographic survey, inventory and subbasin maps; utility
record drawings for storm, sanitary sewer and water pipelines, and drainage
complaints.
27.2 Delineate Subbasin Boundaries. Using available topographic maps, and other
information available from King County, delineate subbasin boundaries.
Task 22. Stormwater Program Evaluation
The Washington State Department of Ecology has implemented the Puget Sound
Stormwater Program in response to stormwater policy presented in the Puget Sound
Water Quality Management Plan. Under the program, Ecology requires all cities to
implement a "Basic Stormwater Program" Ecology also requires jurisdictions in
urbanized areas to complete and implement a range of activities in addition to the basic
stormwater requirements. These additional requirements comprise a "Comprehensive
Stormwater Program for Urbanized Areas" Auburn has been identified by Ecology as
one of 52 municipalities required to meet the comprehensive stormwater program
requirements.
The following Scope of Work describes a compliance/deficiency evaluation of the
Auburn Surface Water Management Program in relation to Ecology's Basic and
Comprehensive Stormwater Programs for municipalities in the Puget Sounds basin.
The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) recently implemented the
Puget Sound Stormwater Program in response to stormwater policy presented in the_,
Puget sound Water Quality Management Plan. Under the program, Ecology requires
15
all cities and counties in the state to implement a "Basic Stormwater Program" by
adopting the following.
• A Stormwater Management Ordinance
• A Stormwater Management Manual
• A Best Management Practices (BMP) Manual
• A Stormwater Maintenance Ordinance.
Ecology also requires jurisdictions in urbanized areas to complete and implement a
range of other activities in addition to the basic stormwater requirements. These
additional requirements comprise a "Comprehensive Stormwater program for
Urbanized Areas." At a minimum, the comprehensive program is required to include
the following elements:
• Pollutant Source Identification, Ranking, and an Ongoing Assessment
Program
• Investigations and Corrective Actions for Problem Storm Drains
• Programs for Operation and Maintenance of the Stormwater System
• A Water Quality Response Program to Investigate Sources of Water
Quality Problems and Implement Compliance/Enforcement
• Establishment of Local Coordination Arrangements such as Inter-local
Agreements, Joint Programs, Consistent Standards, and Regional
Boards of Committees.
• A Stormwater Public Education Program
• Inspection, Compliance, and Enforcement Measures
• An Implementation Schedule
• Retrofitting Existing Development or Treatment of Discharges from
New and Existing Development, as Necessary
The overall goal of this project will be completion of an evaluation of the City's current
stormwater program to determine if the required elements of the Basic and
Comprehensive Programs have been developed and are being implemented. If an
element is being implemented, an evaluation will be made to determine if the scope and
nature of the element meets the Ecology requirement for that element.
Recommendations will be made for appropriate actions to be taken if it is determined
that the element has not been developed and implemented, or only partially satisfies
the Ecology requirement.
22.1 Document Review and Evaluation
The objective of this task is to review all relevant City documents and evaluate the
extent to which they put the City in compliance with Ecology requirements. KCM will.
16
1 Compile all relevant documents from the City of Auburn. These may
include, but are not limited to, the following:
• City ordinances
• Stormwater management and basin plans
• Comprehensive plan sections relating to stormwater
• Pierce County and King County Surface Water Design Manuals
• Other documentation describing program implementation.
2. Review all City documents to determine it and how they meet the
Ecology requirements indicated in the following publications:
• 'Guidance for Local Governments when Submitting Manuals and
Associated Ordinances for Equivalency Review" (the Equivalency
Guide)
• "Stormwater Program Guidance Manual for the Puget Sound
Basin" (the Program Manual).
3 Identify any changes needed to bring current City documents into
compliance with Ecology requirements. Complete a series of
"equivalency tables," similar to those contained in Ecology s
Equivalency Guidance, listing the following:
• Ecology requirement
• Title of City document and, where applicable, section of City
document where Ecology requirement is met
• Adoption status of City document
• Legal status of City Document (e.g., is it a legally binding
document, has it been adopted by reference in an ordinance?)
• Deficiencies in City documents
• Other comments.
Deliverables
• Equivalency tables evaluating the City's current stormwater program
relative to Ecology's requirements.
22.2 Activity Review and Evaluation
Several of the requirements of the comprehensive stormwater program refer to ongoing
implementation activities, rather than to a particular document or ordinance. The
objective of this task is to determine which of the activities required by Ecology are
currently being implemented by the City, any changes to these activities that may be
necessary, and which activities are not currently being implemented by the City
'
KCM will prepare a detailed list of the activity-oriented elements required by Ecology
This list and an initial assessment of activities that have been completed or are planned
17
by the City will be prepared for review by the City A meeting between KCM and the
City will then be held to discuss the list and initial assessment, and to acquire additional
information. KCM will.
1 Prepare detailed list of the activity-oriented elements required by
Ecology
2. Complete an initial assessment of City activities and how they meet
Ecology requirements
3 Meet with Auburn to discuss KCM's initial assessment of the City's
programs and compliance with Ecology requirements
4 Meet with the Department of Ecology to present and discuss the
evaluation, provide a follow-up letter summarizing the discussion and
direction
5 Revise the equivalency tables described in Task II.3 above to include
activity-oriented elements and the following information.
• Ecology requirements and comments
• City activities that meet the requirements
• Discussion of implementation (e.g., if a "one-time" activity has
been planned or completed, how often a periodic activity is
performed)
• Deficiencies in City activities
• Other comments.
Deliverables
• List of activity-oriented elements
• Summary letter to the Department of Ecology
• Final stormwater program equivalency tables.
22.3 Action Plans
Information gathered in Tasks 22.1 and 22.2 will be used to develop an action plan for
the City so that full compliance with all Comprehensive Program requirements can be
achieved. The action plan will include level-of-effort cost estimates for development of
documents or implementation of activities that have been found to be deficient. The
action plan can then be used to establish priorities in a future work program. KCM
will.
1 Develop a list of recommended actions based on the deficiencies listed
in the equivalency table completed in Tasks 22.1 and 22.2
2. Prepare level-of-effort cost estimates to complete each of the
recommended actions
18
3 Set priorities for the actions based on guidance in the Program Manual
and equivalency tables
4. Prepare a Draft Stormwater Program Action Plan that presents the
following:
• Equivalency tables prepared in Tasks 22.1 and 22.2
• A prioritized list ot recommended actions based on equivalency
tables
• Level-of-effort cost estimates to complete each of the
recommended actions
5 Revise draft action plan based on City review and written continents.
Deliverables
• One camera-ready copy of the Draft Stormwater Program Action Plan
• One camera-ready copy ot the Final Stormwater Program Action Plan.
23.4 Coordination with Ecology
The Department of Ecology is responsible for reviewing and approving municipal
stormwater program. KCM will perform the following task:
1 Meet with Ecology to present and discuss the results of the project.
23.5 Draft Chapter for Comprehensive Plan Update
All work complete for this task will be prepared as a chapter of the Comprehensive
Plan Update.
19
KCM, Inc. Exhibit B - ESTIMATE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1917 First Avenue CLIENT City of Auburn
Seattle,WA 98101
Tel (20(i)443-5300 PROJECT Update of Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
Fax (206) 443-5372 file 9840000\costest\aub-cmp5.xls
P.D No. 9840023 Proj. No. 2840023 Date: 2/9/98
LEVEL OF EFFORT—STAFF HOURS
PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION Project Project Prof. Tech. Clerical
Mgmt. Leader Staff Staff Staff
1. Project Administration
1.1 Project Plan / start-up meeting 4 8 4
1.2 Coordination with project team / City 64
1.3 Monthly progress reports 16 4
2. Subbasin Grouping V, HV
2.1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model 8
2.2 Verify/Update Existing SWMM Model 24
2.3 Document Planned Proj. / Update SWMM 2 16
2 4 Identity Problem Areas 2 8
2.5 Evaluate Alternatives 8 32
2.6 City / Project Team Meetings 20 8
2 7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 8 24 4 4
2.8 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 40 16 8
3. Subbasin Grouping AA
3.1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model 8
3 2 Verify/Update Existing SWMM Model 24
3.3 Document Planned Proj. / Update SWMM 2 16
3.4 Wetland Considerations (see subconsultant) 40 16
3.5 Identity Problem Areas 2 8
3.6 Evaluate Alternatives 2 40
3.7 City / Project Team Meetings 20 8
3.8 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 8 24 4 4
3 9 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 40 16 8
4. Subbasin Grouping A, B, Z
4.1 Identity Problem Areas 2 8
4.2 Evaluate Alternatives 8 80
4.3 City / Project Team Meetings 20 8
4.4 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 2 16 4 4
4.5 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 40 16 8
5. Subbasin Grouping G, H, I
5.1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model 8
Page 1 of 4
KCM, Inc. Exhibit B - ESTIMATE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1917 First Avenue CLIENT City of Auburn
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel (206) 443-5300 PROJECT Update of Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
Fax (206) 443-5372 file 9840000\costest\aub-cmp5.xls
P.D No. 9840023 Proj. No. 2840023 Date: 2/9/98
LEVEL OF EFFORT—STAFF HOURS
PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION Project Project Prof. Tech. Clerical
Mgmt. Leader Staff Staff Staff
5.2 Verity/Update Existing SWMM Model 24
5 3 Document Planned Proj. / Update SWMM 2 24
5 4 Identify Problem Areas 2 8
5.5 Evaluate Alternatives 8 24
5.6 City / Project Team Meetings 12 8
5.7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 8 16 4 4
5.8 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 40 16 8
6. Subbasin Grouping C, CC
6 1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model 8
6.2 Vent v/Update Existing SWMM Model 24
6.3 Document Planned Proj. / Update SWMM 2 4
6.4 Identify Problem Areas 2 8
6.5 Evaluate Alternatives 2 8
6.6 Cit\ / Project Team Meetings 10 4
6.7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 2 8 4 4
6.8 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 40 16 8
7 Subbasin D
7.1 Assemble Data / Projects 2 4
7.2 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 24 8 8
8. Subbasin E
8 1 Assemble Data / Projects 2 4
8.2 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 24 8 8
9 Subbasin F
9 1 Assemble Data / Projects 2 4
9 2 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 16 8 8
10. Subbasin K
10.1 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 16 4 4
11. Subbasin L
11.1 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 16 4 4
Page 2 of 4
KCM, Inc. Exhibit B - ESTIMATE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1917 First Avenue CLIENT City of Auburn
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel (206) 443-5300 PROJECT Update of Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
Fax (206) 443-5372 file 9840000\costest\aub-cmp5.xls
P.D No. 9840023 Proj. No. 2840023 Date: 2/9/98
LEVEL OF EFFORT—STAFF HOURS
PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION Project Project Prof. Tech. Clerical
Mgmt. Leader Staff Staff Staff
12. Subbasin N
12.1 Assemble Data / Projects 2 16
12 2 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 16 4 4
13. Subbasin 0
13.1 Assemble Data / Maps / SWMM Model 4
13.2 Verify/Update Existing SWMM Model 16
13.3 Document Planned Proj. / Update SWMM 2 16
13.4 Identity Problem Areas 2 8
13.5 Evaluate Alternatives 2 8
13.6 City / Project Team Meetings 8 8
13 7 Preferred Alternative Recommendation 2 8 4 4
13.8 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 32 16 8
14. Subbasin P
14.1 Verify Existing SWMM Model 16
14.2 Draft Chapter tor Comp Plan Update 2 24 4 4
15. South Area - Boeing
15 I Obtain Boeing Comprehensive Plan 2
15.2 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 8 16 4 4
16. White River West- Lakeland Hills
16.1 Obtain Lakeland Hills Drainage Plan 2
162 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 2 8 24 8 4
17 White River East
17 1 Assemble Data / Maps 2 12
17.2 Delineate Subbasins 2 8 8
18. Southeast Area
18.1 Assemble Data / Maps 2 12
18 2 Delineate Subbasins 2 8 8
19 Lea Hill South Area
19.1 Assemble Data / Maps 2 12
Page 3 of 4
KCM, Inc. Exhibit B - ESTIMATE OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1917 First Avenue CLIENT City of Auburn
Seattle, WA 98101
Tel (206)443-5300 PROJECT Update of Comprehensive Stormwater Plan
Fax (206) 443-5372 file 9840000\costest\aub-cmp5.xls
P.D No. 9840023 Proj. No. 2840023 Date: 2/9/98
LEVEL OF EFFORT— STAFF HOURS
PHASE/TASK DESCRIPTION Project Project Prof. Tech. Clerical
Mgmt. Leader Staff Staff Staff
19.2 Delineate Subbasins 2 8 8
20. Lea Hill North Area
20.1 Assemble Data / Maps 2 12
20.2 Delineate Subbasins 2 8 8
21. West Area
21 1 Assemble Data / Maps 2 12
21 2 Delineate Subbasins 2 8 8
22. Stormwater Program Evaluation
22.1 Document Review and Evaluation 8 64 2
22.2 Activity Review and Evaluation 8 56 2
22.3 Action Plan 8 40 4
22.4 Ecology Coordination 8 16
22.5 Draft Chapter for Comp Plan Update 8 24 8 8
TOTAL HOURS 430 16 1,384 220 144
HOURL\ RATE (DJW) $40 $31 $24 $19 $16
(DJW x 3.1) $124 $96 $74 $59 $50
SUBTOTAL $53,320 $1,538 $102,970 $12,958 $7,142
TOTAL 5177 928
TRAVEL AND PER DIEM ( 500 x 1.10) S550
PRINTING, PUBLICATIONS,COMMUNICATIONS, ( 1,000 x 1.10) $1,100
COMPUTER ( 3,000 x 1.00) $3,000
OTHER(Subconsultants) Katto&Warren/Montgomery Water Group $7,500
Wetlands (Task 3) ( 25,000 x 1.15) $28,750
TOTAL COST $190,078
TOTAL COMPENSATION $190,100
Note: see attached 'Definitions
Page 4 of 4
KCM
DEFINITIONS
'KCM Costs' are defined as direct job wages plus wage overhead plus reimbursable expenses and subconsultant
expenses plus reimbursable expense factor
'Direct Job Wages' are actual hourly rates of individuals.subject to change to reflect adjustments in KCM salary levels
"Wage Overhead' is an amount which takes into account KCNI's operating overhead for general and administrative salaries
and wages and for KCNI's general triage benefits such as holidays,vacation,sick leave,individual insurance,and bonuses.
'Reimbursable Expenses' include but are not limited to
1. Air Fare Expenses—Cost of ticket and travel to and from airport by public conveyances.
2. Auto Lease Expenses—Basic charge,gas.oil.repairs, and insurance.
3. KCM Auto Expenses—cost of using KCM-owned vehicles IS0.31/mile).
4. Employee Auto Rental—Rate paid to employees for using their personal autos on company business
(50.31/pule).
5. Boat Expenses—Cost of using KCM-owned or leased boats at a far commercial rate/hour
6. Meal Expenses— 'Out-of-pocket' cost to employees while away from office on business.
7 Lodging Expenses— 'Out-of-pocket' cult to employees while away from office on business.
8. Equipment Expenses—Cost of KCM-owned. rental. or lease of special equipment required to perform
work
9. Lab Fee Expenses—Cost of consumable laboratory supplies and lab use.
10. Computer Expenses—Cost for the use of outside computer hardware or software as invoiced to KCM
for specific project. Internal computer rates are based on disc storage, CPU. and terminal connect time
used in conjunction with technical programs and word processing.
KCM rates are established as'
— Outside computer hardware and software at invoiced cost to KCM.
— Internal rates'
• Interpro 2430— — $12.00/hour
Production CAD Stations — 512.00/hour
Engineering and Publishing — S 8.00/Hour
All Other Microcomputers — S 4.00/hour
• Printing' Charges for printing of black and white single-copy output are included in the
above processing charges. Plotting and color printing are charged separately
Multiple-copy printing is$0 l0 per additional page.
These time charges for equipment will be documented on KCM time sheets to the nearest 0.5
hour in the appropnate category
11. Production Expenses—Commercial and in-office printing, binding, and reproduction of reports and
contract documents at invoice amount or a fair commercial rate
12. Telephone Expenses — Lang distance telephone and other communication expenses specifically
related to a project
13. Miscellaneous Expenses—Direct job expenses and costs not defined in categones I through 13,such
as special licenses,additional out-of-pocket' employee traveling costs,etc.
'subconsultant Expenses' represent the cost of outside subconsultant technical services and expenses. They
Include but are not limited to
- Foundation and geological consultants
— Technical consultants(electrical)
— Other special technical engineers working outside of the engineers office except those engineers
paid directly by the owner
— Foundation bonngs and testing
— tabu'atory tests
— Property location or base map surveys
4erial photography and preparation of topographic maps
'Reimbursable Expense Factor" is an amount which takes into account KCM activities related to specific reimbursable,
expenses: e.g_. excise tax. liability insurance. and special added administrative costs and fees not related to KCJI wages. and
as indicated in the Professional Services Agreement and/or Estimate of Professional Services
ECM 3/97
ACORD_
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE CSR LB rw m0
1 KCMIN 08/31/98
PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
Lyons Insurance Agency, Inc ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Powdermill Square HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
3844 Kennett Pike, Suite 210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
Wilmington DE 19807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Richard A Kavanaugh COMPANY
Phone No 302-658-5508 Fax No 302-658-12.ra _ [ A Hartford Insurance
�
INSURED D { .� — u 3 , IY
E Twin City Fire Insurance Co
KCM, Inc
SEP 04 1993 co-MAW
1917 First Avenue COMPANY
Seattle WA 98101 F2 D
COVERAGES y ---
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE(MWDD/YY) DATE(MM/DDYV)
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE 1 52000000
A X I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 44SBKGD4304 10/01/98 10/01/99 PRODUCTS COMP/OPAGG S NIL
CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR PERSONAL 8 ADV INJURY 51000000
OWNER'S&CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1000000
FIRE DAMAGE Any one fee) $ 300000
I MED PAP(Any one person) 1510000
I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 51000000
A XI ANY AUTO 44UENFU3301 10/01/98 10/01/99
IALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY 5
I I SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person)
I X HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $I X NON OWNED AUTOS (Per accident)
r--I PROPERTY DAMAGE 5
I GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY EA ACCIDENT I $
Ini ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY.
1 EACH ACCIDENT 15
I AGGREGATE I5
EXCESS LIPBILRY EACH OCCURRENCE 15 4000000
A X1 UMBRELLA FORM 44XHUFU0785 10/01/98 10/01/99 AGGREGATE $ 4000000
1 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND ,_TORY LIMITS OER
EMPLOYERS LIABILITY EL EACH ACCIDENT $ 1000000
T'rit.PROPRIETOR/
$ �IINCL 44WBRM23350 10/01/98 10/01/99 EL DISEASE POLICY LIMB 51000000
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
I
B OFFICERS ARE EXCL 44WLMP3351 10/01/98 10/01/99 EL DISEASE EA EMPLDVEE51000000
OTHER
B Workers Comp 44WBRMP3350 10/01/98 10/01/99
B WA Stop Gap 44WLMP3351 10/01/98 10/01/99
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
The City of Auburn is included as an Additional Insured with respects to the
General Liability and Automobile Liability Coverages only
RE Stormwater Program Evaluation
(#2640063)
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
CITYAUB SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.
City of Auburn BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
Attn Caroline Bergt
25 West Main OF ANY IND UPON THE COMPANY, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES
Auburn WA 98001-4998 ARE Myst
ACORD 25-S(1/95) ACORD CORPORATION 1988
/CS- 0Lf/I
gOORD c9R LB VAIe(MM/UU/YT)
1-KCMIN 08/31/98
O DUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
;Lyons Insurance Agency, Inc ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
Powdermill Square HOLDER.THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,EXTEND OR
3899 Kennett Pike, Suite 210 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
Wilmington DE 19807 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
Richard A. Kavanaugh COMPANY
Phone No 302-658-5508 Fax No 302-658-1253 A Reliance National Indemnity Co
INSURED COMPANY
B
COMPANY
KCM, Inc C
1917 First Avenue COMPANY
Seattle WA 98101 D
COVERAGES
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED,NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS.
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES.LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION LIMITS
LTR DATE(MM/DD/YY) DATE(MM/DDheI
GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $
I COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY PRODUCTS COMP/OP AGO $
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR PERSONAL 8 ADV INJURY 5
OWNER'S&CONTRACTORS PROT EACH OCCURRENCE S
FIRE DAMAGE(Any one lire) 5
MED EXP(Any one person) $
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $
ANY AUTO
I ALL OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY
$
SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per person)
HIRED AUTOS
BODILY INJURY S
NON-OWNED AUTOS (Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE 5
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY EA ACCIDENT I S
ANY AUTO ,OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY I
EACH ACCIDENT S
AGGREGATE S
EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE S
UMBRELLA FORM I AGGREGATE I$
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM I I$
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND WCSTATU 0TH-
EMPLOYERS LIABILITY TORN LIMITS I ER
EL EACH ACCIDENT IS
THE PROPRIETOR/ INCL EL DISEASE POLICY LIMIT $
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE EXCL EL DISEASE EA EMPLOYEE $
OTHER
A Profess /Pollution NTF201513509 10/01/98 10/01/99 See Below For Limits
E&O Legal Liab
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
LIMITS $1,000,000 Ea Cl /$1,000,000 Agg. and $100,000 Retention Ea Cl
CLAIMS MADE FORM. Maximum for all claims during the policy year
Re Stormwater Program Evaluation
(#2690063)
CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION
CI TYAUB SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
30 DAYS WRRTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.
City of Auburn BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY
Caroline Bergt
25 West Main OF ANY IND UPON THE COMPANY, AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES
Auburn WA 98001-4998 AUTH E REPRES NT
< T_
7s'�—
ACORO 25-S(1195) ACORD CORPORATION 1958
RECORDS MANAGEMENT
ORDINANCE/RESOLUTION DISTRIBUTION
ORDINANCE NO DATE ADOPTED• 02- /
RESOLUTION NO. oZIl EFFECTIVE-DATE.
RECORDING FILE. CODE BOOK.
DEPARTMENT DISTRIBUTION
°=:,DEPT
„CONTACT 'w.,„ DATE
CITIZEN REQUESTS
NAME . •.ADDRESS . . !DATE
F.C L E R K\R E C O R DS\R E C F O R M
wngny;o A;l0
>pa10 A 110 'wmlsea all lUea
6661. 'I!Jdy;o Sep 4196 sly; wngny;o A}10 ay;;o leas all pue puey ssaupAA
'8661•
'tienJgad ;o Aep y1L4 ay; uo uingny ;o Aj!O pies ay; jo JoAelAJ ay; Aq panoidde
pue Ilouno0 ay; Aq passed Alnp seen 81-63 oN pies win ApiJao I
„ 8163 ON NOIIf11OS32i„
pa p;ua 'wngny Jo l;10 ay} Jo suol;nlosaa an ;o 81-63 oN uognloseu }o Adoo
;oauoo pue any; 'pn; e sl 6ulobadoj ay; leg; A;luao Agalay op 'uo}6ulyseM}o a;e;S
'bu1N }o A;uno0 ay; ul swops 'Apo apo0 pue uogeiodho0 ledlolunlN e 'wngny
;o A;10 ay} jo mielO Alla Pa!Jllenb 'pa;ulodde Alnp ay; 'weMsea allalued 'I
ZEl£-88Z(£56:xed LOO£-I£6(£SZ):uoneJ1s!8a8ssau!sna
6E0£-7£6(EST):41aLD 41!3
10086 WA`uLngny 'u!eyni 1s3M SZ
)UH13 x.L.DD ■anand
ss ( ONIN AO AINf1O0
(NOIONIHSvM JO RIMS
31aal3 asuaa!9/spioaaa 'Ipglog 3!U L
lliao,pp RlndaO 'uospleya!8 Awe-3
81DIO RI!J'me'seO alla!uvO
lOAVW'H,LOOR-V S31NVHD