HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-18-2013 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDA
Public Works Committee
March 18, 2013 - 3:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes*
B. Public Works Project No. CP1109* (Lee)
Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 6 to Contract No. 11-15 in the Amount of
$1,522.57 and accept construction of Project No. CP1109, 2011 Storm Pipeline
Repair & Replacement, Phase 1
III.RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4908* (Carlaw/Thorn)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Approving the
2013 Stormwater Management Program and Authorizing the Mayor to Include a
Copy of the Program in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit Annual Report for
2012 to the Washington State Department of Ecology
IV.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Resolution No. 4926* (Miller)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the
Adoption of the 2009 King County Regional Hazard Plan and the City of Auburn
Annex to the Plan
The 2009 King County Regional Hazard Plan is not included in the hard copies of
the agenda packet. Hard copies have only been distributed to the Public Works
Committee Members, Mayor, and the Director. The plan may be viewed as part of
the packet online at: www.auburnwa.gov/government/agendas_minutes.htm
B. Resolution No. 4918* (Webb)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending the
2013-2018 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program of the City of Auburn
Pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.77
C. Utility Payback Process (Repp)
D. Corps FPMS Study Design Flood Hydrographs for the Green River Basin*
Page 1 of 113
(Dowdy)
E. Capital Project Status Report* (Gaub)
F. Action Tracking Matrix* (Dowdy)
V.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
March 4, 2013 Draft Minutes
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the February 19, 2013 Public Works
Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 3 of 113
Public Works Committee
March 4, 2013 - 3:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in
Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One
East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wagner, Vice-Chair Bill Peloza, and Member Osborn were
present. Also present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete B. Lewis,
Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, City Engineer/Assistant Director
Dennis Selle, Assistant City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Utilities Engineer
Dan Repp, Transportation Manager Pablo Para, Project Engineer
Robert Lee, Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Innovation and
Technology (IT) Director Ron Tiedeman, Finance Director Shelley
Coleman, Traffic Engineer James Webb, Storm Drainage Engineer
Tim Carlaw, Water Quality Control Coordinator Chris Thorn, and
Public Works Secretary Jennifer Cusmir. Members of the public in
attendance included: from SEFNCO Communications, Inc., Scott
Morrison and citizen Scot Pondelick.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no agenda modifications.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
III. ACTION
A. Approval of Minutes
Vice-Chair Peloza noted that the Committee Members making the
motions and seconding the motions had been reversed on the action
items.
Vice-Chair Peloza requested that the motion be positioned in the
minutes following the discussion of the agenda items and before the
voting results. Chairman Wagner stated that if the placement of the
Page 1 of 8
CA.A Page 4 of 113
motion was due to limitation of the software used to complete the
minutes, the motion can be located prior to the discussion of the
items. Public Works Secretary Cusmir said that she will check with the
City Clerk to determine how others are using the minute’s template in
the software to change the location of the motion.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked that the first sentence for Discussion Item B,
be amended to read, “Vice-Chair Peloza spoke positively about the
report for the Save Our Streets (SOS) program.”
Vice-Chair Peloza noted a formatting error on page 6 of 7, Discussion
Item E.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked that a sentence in the fourth paragraph of
Discussion Item E be amended to read, “Vice-Chair Peloza asked
Mayor Lewis to remind King County of graffiti on Green River Road,
under the 277th bridge.”
Vice-Chair Peloza asked that the first sentence on page 7 of 7,
Discussion Item F, be amended to read, “Finance Director Coleman
responded to a clarification question asked by Vice-Chair Peloza….”
It was moved by Vice-Chair Peloza, seconded by Member Osborne,
that the Committee approve the Public Works Committee Meeting
minutes for date, February 19, 2013, as amended.
Motion carried 3-0.
B. Public Works Project No. CP0921 (Lee)
Vice-Chair Peloza asked why some of the items on the final pay
estimate did not more closely match the Engineer’s
Estimate. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle answered that most of
the items are related to gravels and things that are estimated however;
the actual quantities are difficult to estimate and are not known until
the contractor digs into the existing ground material, i.e. whether
native material or imported material will be used. Assistant
Director/City Engineer Selle explained that one can not predict what
the final trench widths, slopes and depths are going to be because
much of this depends on the contractor’s means and methods.
Member Osborne asked if the sewer television inspection is completed
by City staff or the contractor. Project Engineer Lee answered that for
construction projects, the contractor is required to provide the
inspection. The Maintenance and Operations Sewer Division has their
own video inspection capabilities but they are not used as part of
construction contracts.
Page 2 of 8
CA.A Page 5 of 113
It was moved by Vice-Chair Peloza, seconded by Member Osborne,
that the Committee recommend City Council approve Final Pay
Estimate No. 5 to Contract No. 10-02 in the amount of $25,741.42 and
accept construction of Project No. CP0921, Bi-Annual Sanitary Sewer
Repair and Replacement.
Motion carried 3-0.
IV. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 4904 (Mund)
A Resolution of the City of Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Setting a Public Hearing to Consider a Franchise Agreement with
Zayo Group LLC
Chairman Wagner asked about the grantee facilities being required to
be relocated or replaced, at the City’s request, at the grantee’s
expense. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle answered that if the
facilities are underground and are in the way of the City, the facilities
are relocated at the grantee’s expenses but if the City asks for
facilities, that are not necessarily in the City’s way, to be relocated
underground, there may be a shared cost between the City and the
grantee, depending upon the situation.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked why the Municipal Service Committee is not
the action committee for Resolution No. 4904. Chairman Wagner
pointed out that franchise agreements are the responsibility of the
Municipal Services Committee if they serve the City’s citizens and the
Zayo franchise agreement is for facilities passing through the City,
therefore Public Works is the action committee. Engineering Aide
Mund clarified that the Zayo Group will be serving other businesses in
the City but not the residents of Auburn directly.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked that all of the dollar amounts in the resolution
include the tenth and hundredth decimal places.
Director Dowdy explained that the grantee must obtain pole
attachments agreements from Puget Sound Energy (PSE) and it is
PSE that determines how much space is left and if a utility pole needs
to be replaced, in response to a question asked by Chairman
Wagner. Chairman Wagner asked if the grantee would ever use poles
owned by the City. Director Dowdy answered that only PSE poles are
used for aerial hookups.
It was moved by Vice-Chair Peloza, seconded by Member Osborne,
that the Committee recommend City Council adopt Resolution No.
4904.
Page 3 of 8
CA.A Page 6 of 113
Motion carried 3-0.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Resolution No. 4919 (Tiedeman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Cooperative Purchasing
Agreement with the University of Washington for the Purpose of
Purchasing General Supplies and Equipment
IT Director Tiedeman explained that Resolution No. 4919 authorizes
the City to enter into a cooperative purchasing agreement with the
University of Washington. Tiedeman stated that the agreement will
allow the City to make purchases using contracts that the University
has already negotiated, contracts they have already posted Requests
for Proposals (RFPs) for, or already have contract number for. The
City will be able to share resources that the University has already
gone out to bid on, and vice versa, making the contract a joint
cooperative agreement.
IT Director Tiedeman responded to questions asked by Chairman
Wagner regarding the possible limitations of the agreement in cases
where a bid specifies quantities.
Mayor Lewis and IT Director Tiedeman explained how the City could
utilize the agreement authorized by Resolution No. 4919 in conjunction
with the existing procurement agreement with National League of
Cities, in response to a question asked by Vice-Chair Peloza.
The Committee supported adoption of Resolution No. 4919.
B. Resolution No. 4913 (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Identifying the City Council's Desire to Move Forward with Funding
Preparations for the City of Auburn Community Center
Finance Director Coleman explained that Resolution No. 4913
formalizes the City Council’s intent on evaluating the funding for the
Community Center.
Vice-Chair Peloza asked for a date when the Council will be briefed on
the current Community Center footprint and functionality. Chairman
Wagner answered that the topic was going to be on the agenda for the
last Committee of the Whole Meeting, but that the agenda was too
long to include the Community Center. Chairman Wagner suggested
scheduling a workshop. Mayor Lewis suggested that instead of a
workshop, the Parks Department can do a presentation at the next
Council Meeting.
Page 4 of 8
CA.A Page 7 of 113
Finance Director Coleman said that any fund that is governmental in
nature may be used, but would not include the enterprise funds, in
response to a question asked by Member Osborne.
The Committee supported adoption of Resolution No. 4913.
C. Resolution No. 4917 (Webb)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Setting a Hearing Date in Relation to Amending the 2013-2018
Transportation Improvement Program of the City of Auburn Pursuant
to R.C.W. Chapter 35.77
There were no questions from the Committee.
The Committee supported adoption of Resolution No. 4917.
D. NPDES II Annual Report (Carlaw/Thorn)
Chairman Wagner asked if NPDES deals with infiltration of storm
water into the sanitary sewer system. Water Quality Coordinator Thorn
answered that the current permit does not relate to instances of
infiltration, but the new permit is looking in to it, potentially classifying
infiltration as an illicit discharge.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn stated that the City is required to
submit its Annual Report with the Stormwater Management Program
attached by March 31, 2013, in response to a question asked by
Chairman Wagner.
The Committee and staff reviewed the 2012 Annual Report.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn briefed the Committee on the current
permit requirements and methods for detecting illicit discharges. Thorn
stated that staff is not finding much outfall that would indicate illicit
discharge.
The Committee and staff discussed the number and types of calls
received on the hotline.
Chairman Wagner asked for a definition of a “spill to MS4.” Thorn
answered that an MS4 would include conveyance systems for storm
drainage, gutters and the street surface. Staff responded to several
discharges or spills that do not make their way into the storm system
or natural water.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn answered questions asked by the
Committee regarding the types of discharges staff responds to and the
type of reporting used.
Page 5 of 8
CA.A Page 8 of 113
Thorn answered questions asked by Chairman Wagner regarding the
total maximum daily load process.
Responding to a question asked by Chairman Wagner, Storm
Drainage Engineer Carlaw and Water Quality Coordinator Thorn
explained how site plans are reviewed by the Planning and
Development and Building Departments. Chairman Wagner spoke
about the potential of escalation of the number of site plan reviews and
possible staffing issues.
Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated that the plans that are
approved are issued permits and comply with the Design Standards,
answering a question asked by Vice-Chair Peloza regarding the
number of rejected site plans.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn stated that the first step in
enforcement is education and attempts to gain compliance willingly
and if there is no response to those measures, staff can escalate the
matter, in response to questions asked by Chairman Wagner.
The Committee suggested that next year, Planning or Building staff be
present at the meeting for discussion of the Annual Report.
Thorn explained the inspections of the public facilities in development
and inspections of ponds, bioswales, etc., following questions asked
by Chairman Wagner.
The Committee and staff discussed the routine inspections of critical
sites after major storms.
The Committee and staff reviewed the draft 2013 Stormwater
Management Plan.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn answered questions asked by
Chairman Wagner regarding maximum daily load requirements.
The Committee and staff discussed monitoring of various river and
creek outflows.
Chairman Wagner asked how the City challenges the Department of
Ecology’s maximum daily load requirements when they are initially
assigned. Utilities Engineer Repp answered that challenges can be
made and a consultant would be brought it to assist.
Member Osborne asked if an advisory board is a requirement of the
permit. Water Quality Coordinator Thorn answered that it is not
Page 6 of 8
CA.A Page 9 of 113
required; however a public comment period is required.
The Committee and staff continued their review of the draft
Stormwater Management Program.
Responding to questions asked by Chairman Wagner, Water Quality
Coordinator Thorn stated that there is a regional water quality forum
that was working to put together proposals for the Department of
Ecology for the next permit cycle to influence what would be included
in the permit for monitoring. City staff participated in that process.
Chairman Wagner requested an NPDES executive summary, focused
on monitoring and enforcement, be provided to the entire Council.
Water Quality Coordinator Thorn explained the schedule outlines for
approval of the program. The public review and comment period
began March 4th. The Planning and Community Development
Committee will discuss the Annual Report and program on March 7th.
On March 18th the Public Works Committee will be asked to take
action and a Public Hearing will be held at the City Council
Meeting. The Council will be asked to adopt Resolution No. 4908 at
the same meeting.
The Committee, Mayor Lewis and staff discussed public education for
illicit discharging into the storm system.
E. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub)
Item 3 – C207A – A Street NW Corridor – Phase 1: Chairman Wagner
asked if there have been any complaints about the connection at the
north end of the corridor. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that
there have been no complaints.
Item 10 – CP0915 – Well 1 Improvements – Transmission
Lines: Chairman Wagner asked for staff to check with the contactor
and verify the flaggers on the project site are fully trained. Assistant
City Engineer Gaub answered that all flaggers are required to have
flagging cards, but she will check with staff to see if there have been
any issues.
Item 9 – C201A – M Street Underpass: Vice-Chair Peloza asked about
the installation of a live camera. Mayor Lewis stated that there is a
camera and the feed can be viewed on the City website. Assistant
City Engineer Gaub stated that there is one new railroad bridge being
used by BNSF while the second bridge is under construction, in
response to a question asked by Member Osborne.
Item 13 – CP1108 – 2011/12/13 Citywide Storm Pond
Page 7 of 8
CA.A Page 10 of 113
Cleaning: Member Osborne commented on the additional ponds
added to the scope of the project. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated
that the budget is covering all 16 ponds in the project’s scope in order
to catch up on the outstanding work that must be completed for our
permit requirements.
Item B – CP1115 – City Hall NW Plaza Improvements: Chairman
Wagner asked if storm drainage similar to the front plaza is included in
the project. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the current scope
for the north plaza does not include any underground storm drainage
storage because there is not as much open area on the north side as
there was on the front side of City Hall to accommodate it.
F. Action Tracking Matrix (Dowdy)
Item J – BNSF Stampede Pass Line: Chairman Wagner stated that
staff can reschedule the completion date for later.
Item M – Auburn Valley Humane Society – Wayfinding
Signage: Chairman Wagner asked for the estimated completion
date. Transportation Manager Para answered that the signs will be
installed before April 1st.
Member Osborne reminded staff to include the NPDES Executive
Summary to the matrix. The estimated completion date will be the first
Public Works Committee Meeting in May.
Item O – Pedestrian Visibility Improvements on A Street NW (Post
Office exit): Vice-Chair Peloza asked that “west” be included in the
item description.
Chairman Wagner asked about the estimated completion
date. Assistant Director/City Engineer Selle stated that staff is trying to
contact the Post Office and once staff receives something definitive
from them the dates can be included on the matrix. Chairman Wagner
suggested using the date of the first Public Works Committee Meeting
in May.
VI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:56 p.m.
Approved this 18th day of March, 2013.
___________________________ ______________________________
Rich Wagner, Chair Jennifer Cusmir, Department Secretary
Page 8 of 8
CA.A Page 11 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1109
Date:
March 11, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Final Pay Estimate
Vicinity Map
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 6 to
Contract No. 11-15 in the amount of $1,522.57 and accept construction of Project No.
CP1109, 2011 Storm Pipeline Repair & Replacement, Phase 1.
Background Summary:
This project constructed storm drainage conveyance improvements throughout the City at the following
locations: 37th St NW Outfall, 36th St SE, 17th St SE, and Academy Dr SE. Improvements included
replacement of 400 linear feet of storm culvert pipe (Academy Dr SE), installation of a catch basin with
sluice gate (37th St NW Outfall), installation of 15 linear feet of storm culvert pipe (17th St SE), and
construction of a new catch basin with 54 linear feet of storm pipe (36th St SE). Also included in the project
was asphalt pavement repair, restoration of cement concrete driveway approaches and
restoration/replacement of disturbed landscaping.
This project is within the available funds for the work.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Lee
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:CA.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.B Page 12 of 113
Project No: CP1109Project Title:
Project Manager: Robert Lee
Project Initiation
Initiation Date: _8/01/2011__ Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: _9/13/2011_ Contract Award
Award Date: __9/30/2011__ Change Order 3 Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding Prior Years 20122013 Future Years Total
432 Fund - Storm R&R Program**127,092116,5074,0230 247,622
Total127,092116,5074,0230247,622
Activity Prior Years20122013Future Years Total
Design Engineering - City Costs26,0885710026,659
Construction Contract Bid (Ph1)77,80597,8661,5230177,194
Change Order #1 4,6850004,685
Change Order #2 7,7710007,771
Change Order #3 031,1340031,134
Line Item Changes 0 (20,977)00 (20,977)
Construction Engineering - City Costs 10,743 7,913 2,500 0 21,156
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
2011 Storm Pipeline Repair and Replacement Program Ph 1
Date: March 11, 2013
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Construction Engineering - City Costs10,7437,9132,500021,156
Total127,092116,5074,0230247,622
Prior Years20122013Future YearsTotal
*432 Funds Budgeted ( )(127,092)(116,507)(4,023)0(247,622)
432 Funds Needed 127,092116,5074,0230247,622
*432 Fund Project Contingency ( )00(0)0(0)
432 Funds Required 00000
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates money the City has available.
** This is a portion of the 2011 and 2012 annual budget for the Storm Repair & Replacement Program.
432 Storm Budget Status
H:\PROJ\CP1109-2011 Storm Pipeline Repair Replacement\Budget\Pipe R&R Budget Status.xls 1 of 1CA.B Page 13 of 113
CA.B Page 14 of 113
CA.B Page 15 of 113
CA.B Page 16 of 113
CA.B Page 17 of 113
CA.B Page 18 of 113
CA.B Page 19 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4908
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4908
City of Auburn 2012 Annual Report
2013 Auburn Stormwater Management
Plan - Final Draft
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend that Council adopts Resolution No. 4908.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn was issued a municipal stormwater permit by the Washington State
Department of Ecology in compliance with the provisions of the State of Washington
Water Pollution Control Law and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (The Clean
Water Act).
Requirements of the Permit include the development and annual update of a Stormwater
Management Program (SWMP) which details the actions and activities to be
implemented by the City in order to reduce the discharge of pollutants.
The SWMP is to include measures related to Public Education and Outreach, Public
Involvement and Participation, Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination, Controlling
Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment and Construction Sites, and Pollution
Prevention and Operation and Maintenance for Municipal Operations. The Permit lists
specific actions and methods that the City must implement through the SWMP.
The City of Auburn is accepting comments on the draft 2013 Stormwater Management
Program. Written comments must be received by close of business on March 18, 2013.
There will be a public hearing at the March 18th City Council meeting where comments
will also be accepted.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Carlaw/Thorn
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:RES.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 20 of 113
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDRES.A Page 21 of 113
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 4908
February 7, 2013
Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 4908
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO INCLUDE A COPY OF THE PROGRAM IN THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
WESTERN WASHINGTON PHASE II MUNICIPAL STORMWATER
PERMIT ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2012 TO THE WASHINGTON
STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WHEREAS, The Washington State Department of Ecology issued a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Western Washington Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit that regulates the discharge of stormwater from
municipal stormwater systems; and
WHEREAS, the City operates a municipal stormwater system and is
regulated under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Western
Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit; and
WHEREAS, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit requires
development and implementation of a Stormwater Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the Stormwater Management Program is required to be
updated annually;
WHEREAS, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit requires submittal
of an Annual Report which is to include a copy of the updated Stormwater
Management Program.
RES.A Page 22 of 113
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 4908
February 7, 2013
Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the updated Stormwater Management Program is
approved for implementation in the City of Auburn in substantial conformity with
the copy of the Program attached hereto, marked as Exhibit “A” and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of
this legislation, including submitting a copy of the Program with the City’s
Annual Report to the Department of Ecology.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of ____________, 2013.
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
RES.A Page 23 of 113
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 4908
February 7, 2013
Page 3 of 3
City Attorney
RES.A Page 24 of 113
RES.A Page 25 of 113
RES.A Page 26 of 113
RES.A Page 27 of 113
RES.A Page 28 of 113
RES.A Page 29 of 113
RES.A Page 30 of 113
RES.A Page 31 of 113
RES.A Page 32 of 113
RES.A Page 33 of 113
RES.A Page 34 of 113
RES.A Page 35 of 113
RES.A Page 36 of 113
RES.A Page 37 of 113
RES.A Page 38 of 113
RES.A Page 39 of 113
RES.A Page 40 of 113
RES.A Page 41 of 113
RES.A Page 42 of 113
RES.A Page 43 of 113
RES.A Page 44 of 113
RES.A Page 45 of 113
RES.A Page 46 of 113
Resolution No. 4908
Exhibit “A”
CITY OF AUBURN
2013 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM
City of Auburn, WA
March 2013
RES.A Page 47 of 113
Table of Contents City of Auburn Compliance Strategy and Work Plan
ii
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\Swmps\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.Docx
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.1 Overview .......................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Regulatory Background ................................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 City of Auburn Regulated Area ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.4 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Compliance ............................................................................................. 2
1.5 SWMP Implementation Responsibilities .......................................................................................................... 2
1.6 Document Organization ................................................................................................................................... 3
2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION ........................................................................... 1
2.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
2.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
2.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 2
3. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH .................................................................................................................. 1
3.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
3.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
3.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 2
4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 1
4.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
4.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
4.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 1
5. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION ........................................................................................... 1
5.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
5.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
5.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 2
6. CONTROLLING RUNOFF FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT, REDEVELOPMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION SITES .... 1
6.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
6.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
6.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 2
7. POLLUTION PREVENTION AND OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE FOR MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS ............... 1
7.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
7.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
7.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 2
8. MONITORING ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
8.1 Permit Requirements ....................................................................................................................................... 1
8.2 Current Compliance Activities .......................................................................................................................... 1
8.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities ................................................................................................................ 1
APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................................................. A-1
Acronyms and Definitions ..................................................................................................................................... A-1
RES.A Page 48 of 113
iii
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2-1. 2013 Stormwater Management Administration Program Work Plan ……………………………..………2-2
Table 3-1. 2013 Public Education and Outreach Work Plan ……………………………..…………………………….3-2
Table 4-1. 2013 Public Involvement Work Plan…………………………..………………………………………. …….4-2
Table 5-1. 2013 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Work Plan ……………………………………………….5-2
Table 6-1. 2013 Controlling Runoff from Development, Redevelopment, and Construction Sites Work Plan……6-2
Table 7-1. 2013 Pollution Prevention and Operations and Maintenance Work Plan………………………………..7-2
Table 8-1. 2013 Water Quality Monitoring Work Plan…………………………………………………………………..8-2
RES.A Page 49 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Overview
This document presents the City of Auburn’s Stormwater Management Program (SWMP). Preparation and
maintenance of this SWMP is required by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) as a
condition of the Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit (the Phase II Permit). The
Phase II permit covers discharges from regulated small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s).
The permit to discharge stormwater is designed to reduce the discharge of pollutants, protect water quality,
and meet the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act.
Appendix A includes acronyms and definitions from the Permit to help the reader understand the City’s
Stormwater Management Program.
1.2 Regulatory Background
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit program is a requirement of the
federal Clean Water Act, which is intended to protect and restore waters for “fishable, swimmable” uses. The
federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has delegated permit authority to state environmental
agencies, and these agencies can set permit conditions in accordance with and in addition to the minimum
federal requirements. In Washington, the NPDES-delegated permit authority is the Washington State
Department of Ecology (Ecology).
In Washington, municipalities with a population of over 100,000 (as of the 1990 census) were designated as
Phase I communities and must comply with Ecology’s Phase I NPDES Municipal Stormwater Permit.
Auburn’s 1990 census was below the 100,000 threshold, and the City must comply with the Phase II
Municipal Stormwater Permit. About 100 other municipalities in Washington must also comply with the
Phase II Permit, along with Auburn, as operators of small municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s).
Ecology’s Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit is available on Ecology’s website at
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/stormwater/municipal/phaseIIww/wwphiipermit.html
The Permit allows municipalities to discharge stormwater runoff from municipal drainage systems into the
state’s water bodies (e.g., streams, rivers, lakes, wetlands) as long as municipalities implement programs to
protect water quality by reducing the discharge of “non-point source” pollutants to the “maximum extent
practicable” (MEP) through application of Permit-specified “best management practices” (BMPs). The BMPs
specified in the Permit are collectively referred to as the Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) and
grouped under the following Program components:
Public Education and Outreach
Public Involvement and Participation
Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Controlling Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment, and Construction Sites
Pollution Prevention and Municipal Operation and Maintenance for Municipal Operations
RES.A Page 50 of 113
1: Introduction City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
Monitoring
The Permit issued by Ecology became effective on August 1, 2012 and expires on July 31, 2013. The Permit
requires the City to report annually (March 31st of each year) on progress in SWMP implementation for the
previous year. The Permit also requires submittal of documentation that describes proposed SWMP activities
for the period of January through July 2013. Throughout the period of January through July 2013 the City
will continue to implement existing programs and maintenance activities.
1.3 City of Auburn Regulated Area
The Western Washington Phase II Permit applies to operators of regulated small MS4s that discharge
stormwater to waters of Washington State located west of the crest of the Cascade Range (west of the eastern
boundaries of Whatcom, Skagit, Snohomish, King, Pierce, Lewis and Skamania counties). For cities, the
Permit requirements extend to those areas of each City that drain to MS4s. Most of Auburn drains to MS4s
that ultimately discharge into the Green River, the White River, or Mill Creek. In addition, some portions of
the City drain to regional infiltration basins.
1.4 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Compliance
The federal Clean Water Act requires that Ecology establish “Total Maximum Daily Loads” (TMDL) for
rivers, streams, lakes, and marine waters that don’t meet water quality standards. A TMDL is a calculation of
the maximum amount of a pollutant that a water body can receive and still meet water quality standards.
After the TMDL has been calculated for a given water body, Ecology determines how much each source
must reduce its discharges of the pollutant in order bring the water body back into compliance with the water
quality standards. The Clean Water Act requires that TMDL requirements must be included in the NPDES
permits for dischargers into the affected water bodies.
Stormwater discharges covered under this permit are required to implement actions necessary to achieve the
pollutant reductions called for in applicable TMDLs. Applicable TMDLs are those approved by the EPA
before the issuance date of the Permit or which have been approved by the EPA prior to the date the
permittee’s application was received by Ecology. Information on Ecology’s TMDL program is available on
Ecology’s website at www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/tmdl.
The current permit does not contain any TMDL requirements for the City of Auburn. However, Ecology
has identified several water bodies that do not appear to meet the water quality standards. Ecology has
developed and the EPA has approved fecal coliform TMDLs for the Puyallup River Watershed. In
accordance with the Ecology approved Quality Assurance Project Plan, Auburn will continue to support the
Puyallup River TMDL clean up effort by conducting wet weather sampling through April 2013.
1.5 SWMP Implementation Responsibilities
The Utilities Engineering Division in the Public Works Department coordinates the overall administration of
efforts to comply with Permit requirements. The work plan tables in each Chapter provide the lead
departments for the associated task. Other major departments/divisions included in the 2013 SWMP
implementation include Maintenance and Operations (M&O), Human Resources (HR), Development
Engineering, Permit Center, Innovation and Technology (IT)), and Parks.
RES.A Page 51 of 113
1: Introduction City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
3
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
1.6 Document Organization
The contents of this document are based upon Permit requirements and Ecology’s “Guidance for City and
County Annual Reports for Western Washington, Phase II Municipal Stormwater General Permits.” The
program components of this SWMP are organized as listed in the Permit:
Section 2.0 addresses Permit requirements for administering the City’s Stormwater Management
Program for 2013.
Section 3.0 addresses Permit requirements for public education and outreach for 2013.
Section 4.0 addresses Permit requirements for public involvement and participation for 2013.
Section 5.0 addresses Permit requirements for illicit discharge detection and elimination for 2013.
Section 6.0 addresses Permit requirements for controlling runoff from new development,
redevelopment, and construction sites for 2013.
Section 7.0 addresses Permit requirements for pollution prevention and operations and maintenance
for municipal operations for 2013.
Section 8.0 addresses Permit requirements for the monitoring section of the Permit for 2013.
Each section includes a summary of the relevant Permit requirements, a description of current activities, and
a table showing the planned activities for 2013. This document also includes acronyms and definitions in
Appendix A for easy reference.
RES.A Page 52 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
This section of the SWMP describes Permit requirements related to overall Stormwater Management
Program administration, including descriptions of the City’s current and planned compliance activities for
2013.
2.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.A) requires the City to:
Develop and implement a Stormwater Management Program and prepare written documentation for
submittal to Ecology by March 31, 2013. The purpose of the SWMP is to reduce the discharge of
pollutants from the municipal stormwater system to the maximum extent practicable and thereby
protect water quality.
Submit an annual compliance report (for 2012) to Ecology by March 31, 2013 that summarizes the
status of implementation and provides information from assessment and evaluation procedures
collected during the reporting period.
Coordinate with other permittees on stormwater related policies programs, and projects within
adjacent or shared areas.
2.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
The City is on track to comply with Ecology requirements for submittal of SWMP documentation by
March 31, 2013. The Utilities Engineering Division leads the development of the future planned
activities with input and support from several other departments.
The City created an NPDES implementation management group.
The City set up the systems for tracking training. Training attendance is recorded and kept on file with
Human Resources.
The City has defined its strategy for cost tracking. Cost tracking is managed by staff recording time
spent on Permit elements on their timecards using project coding numbers. Reports can be generated
by the Finance Department to determine annual costs by element.
The City has defined and implemented a strategy for managing SOPs. SOPs are available for staff use
on the City’s Intranet.
The City is participating in a regional education and outreach consortium. Staff has ensured that the
City’s education and outreach program will work in concert with regional efforts such as the Puget
Sound Starts Here campaign.
The City is on track to comply with Ecology’s requirements for submittal of the 2012 Annual Report
by March 31, 2013.
RES.A Page 53 of 113
2. Stormwater Management Program Administration City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
2.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
Auburn has positioned itself well to maintain compliance. Table 2-1 presents the proposed work plan for the
2013 SWMP administration activities.
Table 2-1. 2013 Stormwater Management Administration Program Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
SWMP-1
Summarize annual activities for "Stormwater
Management Program" component of Annual Report;
identify any updates to Program document. Define
process and roles for annual updates for SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
RES.A Page 54 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
3. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH
This section describes the Permit requirements related to public education and outreach, including
descriptions of the City’s current and planned compliance activities for 2013.
3.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.C.1) requires the City to:
Prioritize and target education and outreach activities to specified audiences, including the general
public, businesses, residents/homeowners, landscapers, property managers, engineers, contractors,
developers, review staff and land use planners, and other City employees to reduce or eliminate
behaviors and practices that cause or contribute to adverse stormwater impacts.
Have an outreach program that is designed to improve the target audience’s understanding of the
problem and what they can do to solve it.
Track and maintain records of public education and outreach activities.
3.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
Collaboration with other NPDES municipalities through involvement in the Stormwater Outreach for
Regional Municipalities (STORM) integrated public education campaign, Puget Sound Starts Here
(PSSH). This campaign includes public service ads broadcast locally and on cable tv and the website
www.pugetsoundstartshere.org/. The City of Auburn broadcasts PSSH commercials on the City’s
government TV channel (TV 21).
Many of the current education and outreach activities that address stormwater management are
targeted at the general public, residents/homeowners, and some industries. Some of these programs
are listed below:
• Natural yard care workshops
• Fund raiser car wash kits
• Used motor oil and household hazardous waste program
• Residential hazardous waste newsletter
• Kids day booth
• Water Festival
• Household hazardous waste mobile
• Stormwater lobby display in the Customer Service Center.
• Spring Clean-up (bulky item collection)
• News letter (quarterly or biannually) for business
RES.A Page 55 of 113
3: Public Education and Outreach City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
• Residential cooking oil recycling
The City tracks its education and outreach efforts.
3.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
The City plans to continue the program that has been developed over the last six years. The target audiences
include:
The general public
Businesses (including home-based and mobile businesses)
Residents/homeowners
Landscapers
Property managers
Engineers, contractors, and developers
City plan review staff, land use planners, and other City employees.
Table 3-1 presents the work plan for the 2013 SWMP public education and outreach activities.
Table 3-1. 2013 Public Education and Outreach Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
EDUC-1
Continue collaboration with other NPDES
municipalities through Stormwater Outreach for
Regional Municipalities (STORM) and Puget Sound
Starts Here efforts to promote regional education and
outreach programs.
Utilities
Engineering
Refinements to existing
public education and
outreach activities are on-
going.
EDUC-2
Refine education and outreach strategy to supplement
existing education activities. An example would be
evaluating the current pet waste cleanup education
strategy and whether existing education activities
should be supplemented for better results.
Utilities
Engineering
EDUC-3
Implement new or modify existing education and
outreach activities. An example would be
implementing actions related to our Kid’s
Day educational activities based on the evaluation
done after the 2012 event.
Utilities
Engineering
EDUC-4
Staff training related to Surface Water Management
Manual Implementation/Technical Standards:
• Permitting
• Plan Review
• Site Inspections
• Maintenance Standards.
Utilities
Engineering
EDUC-5
Inform public employees, businesses and the general
public of the hazards associated with illegal
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
Utilities
Engineering Ongoing
RES.A Page 56 of 113
3: Public Education and Outreach City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
3
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
EDUC-6
Summarize annual activities for "Public Education and
Outreach" component of Annual Report; identify any
updates to SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
RES.A Page 57 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
4. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT
This section describes the Permit requirements related to public involvement, including descriptions of the
City’s current and planned compliance activities for 2013.
4.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.C.2) requires the City to:
Provide ongoing opportunities for public involvement through advisory boards or commissions and
watershed committees, and public participation in developing rate structures and budgets, stewardship
programs, environmental actions, or other similar activities. The public must be able to participate in the
decision-making processes, including development, implementation, and update of the SWMP.
Make the SWMP and Annual Compliance Report available to the public, by posting on the City’s website.
Make any other documents required to be submitted to Ecology in response to Permit conditions
available to the public.
4.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
The City has defined a series of public involvement activities intended to meet the Permit requirements
for public involvement in development of the Stormwater Management Program. This process involves
presenting the draft SWMP to the Planning and Community Development (PCDC) and Public Works
(PWC) Committees. The City will then have a public hearing and presentation to the City Council.
The City will make the Stormwater Management Program document and Annual Compliance Report
available to the public on the City website.
4.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
The City of Auburn has a history of including the public in decision making. Table 4-1 below presents the
work plan for the 2013 SWMP public involvement activities.
RES.A Page 58 of 113
4: Public Involvement City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
Table 4-1. 2013 Public Involvement Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
PI-1 Provide public involvement opportunities for annual
SWMP update.
Utilities
Engineering Public involvement
opportunities will be available
before 3/31/2013 submittal. PI-2
Make SWMP document and Annual Compliance
Report available to public by posting on the City
website.
Utilities
Engineering
PI-3
Summarize annual activities for "Public Involvement
and Participation" component of Annual Report;
identify any updates to SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
PI-4
Provide public involvement opportunity for planting
native plants and invasive species removal at the
Auburn Environmental Park.
Planning and
Development
Department
2013
RES.A Page 59 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
5. ILLICIT DISCHARGE DETECTION AND ELIMINATION
This section describes the Permit requirements related to illicit discharge detection and elimination (IDDE),
including descriptions of the City’s current and planned compliance activities for 2013.
5.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.C.3) requires the City to:
Implement an ongoing program to detect and remove illicit discharges, connections, and improper
disposal, including any spills into the municipal separate storm sewers owned or operated by the City.
Maintain a storm sewer system map, have ordinances that prohibit illicit discharges, and implement an
ongoing program to detect and address illicit discharges.
Publicly list and publicize a hotline or other local telephone number for public reporting of spills and
other illicit discharges. Track illicit discharge reports and actions taken in response through close-out,
including enforcement actions.
Inform public employees, businesses and the general public of hazards associated with illegal
discharges and improper disposal of waste.
Train staff on proper IDDE response SOPs and municipal field staff to recognize and report illicit
discharges.
Summarize all illicit discharges and connections reported to the City and response actions taken,
including enforcement actions, in the Annual Compliance Report; identify any updates to the SWMP.
5.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
The City has completed the mapping required for the Permit and is continually adding data to improve
the quality of the information in the storm drainage system layer of the GIS map. The City also has an
SOP for keeping the municipal separate storm sewer system map and inventory up-to-date.
City codes and standards currently have sections that address the required illicit discharges and civil
infractions.
Citizens can report illicit discharges or illicit dumping using the published spill hotline number or any
of the phone numbers published by the City. The calls are routed to Operations and Maintenance
where they are recorded and distributed to the appropriate response authority.
The City tracks spills, illicit discharges, and inspections.
The City has chosen to use CarteGraph as its issue tracking and resolution system.
The City created an IDDE response and enforcement SOP.
The City has trained staff for illicit discharge recognition and response.
The City has performed field assessments at primary outfalls.
RES.A Page 60 of 113
5: Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
5.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
Table 5-1 presents the work plan for 2013 SWMP illicit discharge detection and elimination activities.
Table 5-1. 2013 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
IDDE-1 Define and implement City-wide IDDE Program and
develop any necessary supplemental IDDE activities.
Utilities
Engineering Ongoing
IDDE-2
Continue to review and update storm system map to
address data gaps and Permit requirements.
Utilities
Engineering/IT
Ongoing
IDDE-3
Conduct a field assessment of one high priority water
body. The water body to be assessed in 2013 will be
the Auburn valley aquifer.
Utilities
Engineering
Complete assessment field
work for one high priority
water body this year.
IDDE-4
Summarize annual activities for "Illicit Discharge
Detection and Elimination" component of Annual
Report; identify any updates to SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
RES.A Page 61 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
6. CONTROLLING RUNOFF FROM NEW DEVELOPMENT,
REDEVELOPMENT, AND CONSTRUCTION SITES
This section describes the Permit requirements related to controlling runoff from new development,
redevelopment, and construction sites, including descriptions of the City’s current and planned compliance
activities for 2013.
6.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.C.4) requires the City to:
Implement, and enforce a program to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff (i.e., illicit discharges) to
the municipal separate storm sewer system from new development, redevelopment, and construction
site activities. The program must apply to both private and public projects, including roads, and
address all construction/development-associated pollutant sources.
Have adopted regulations (codes and standards), have plan review, inspection, and escalating
enforcement SOPs necessary to implement the program in accordance with Permit conditions,
including the minimum technical requirements in Appendix 1 of the Permit.
Develop provisions (plan review, inspection, and enforcement) and SOPs to allow non-structural
preventive actions and source reduction approaches such as Low Impact Development techniques to
minimize the creation of impervious surfaces and the disturbance of native soils and vegetation.
Have adopted regulations (codes and standards) and processes to verify adequate long-term operations
and maintenance of new post-construction permanent stormwater facilities and BMPs in accordance
with Permit conditions, including an annual inspection frequency and/or approved alternative
inspection frequency and maintenance standards for private drainage systems as protective as those in
Chapter IV of the 2005 Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
Provide copies of the Notice of Intent (NOI) for construction or industrial activities to representatives
of the proposed new development and redevelopment.
Provide training to staff on the new codes, standards, and SOPs and create public education and
outreach materials.
Record and maintain records of all inspections and enforcement actions by staff.
Summarize annual activities for the “Controlling Runoff” component of the Annual Compliance
Report; identify any updates to the SWMP.
6.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
The City has existing programs, codes, and standards that address the Permit requirements for
management of stormwater runoff from development, redevelopment, and construction sites. The City
reviews all stormwater site plans for proposed development.
RES.A Page 62 of 113
6: Controlling Runoff from New Development, Redevelopment
and Construction Sites City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
The City adopted a stormwater management manual approved by Ecology as equivalent to the 2005
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
The City has a site planning process for BMP selection and design criteria.
The City inspects all permitted development sites during construction and after construction.
The City clearly identifies the party responsible for operations and maintenance (O&M) and requires
long-term O&M of permitted facilities and BMPs.
The City tracks and records inspections and enforcement actions by staff.
The City provides copies of Notices of Intent (NOI) for construction and industrial activities in the
pre-application meeting with developers.
Construction inspectors and most building inspectors have the required erosion control training.
The City submitted the Permit required LID Implementation Report to Ecology.
Engineering staff have obtained LID Certification through the Washington State University Extension
Program.
6.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
The City has a program to help reduce stormwater runoff from new development and construction sites.
Table 6-1 presents the work plan for 2013 SWMP activities related to runoff control for new development,
redevelopment, and construction sites.
Table 6-1. 2013 Controlling Runoff from Development, Redevelopment, and Construction Sites Work
Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
CTRL-1
Track and report construction, new development, and
redevelopment permits, inspections and enforcement
actions.
Planning/ Permit
Center On-going.
CTRL-2 Conduct annual inspection of all treatment and flow
control (other than catch basins) – private systems.
Utilities
Engineering On-going
CTRL-3
Summarize annual activities for "Controlling Runoff
from New Development, Redevelopment, and
Construction Sites" component of Annual Report;
identify any updates to SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
CTRL-4 City staff will receive Certified Erosion and Sediment
Control Lead training.
Building
Department
Spring 2013
RES.A Page 63 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
7. POLLUTION PREVENTION AND OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE FOR MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
This section describes the Permit requirements related to pollution prevention and operations and
maintenance for municipal operations, including descriptions of the City’s current and planned compliance
activities for 2013.
7.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S5.C.5) requires the City to:
Implement an O&M program, with the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from
municipal separate stormwater system and municipal O&M activities.
Establish maintenance standards for the municipal separate stormwater system that are at least as
protective as those specified in the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington.
Perform inspections of stormwater flow control and treatment facilities and catch basins and perform
maintenance as needed to comply with maintenance standards.
Check treatment and flow control facilities after major storms and perform repairs as needed in
accordance with adopted maintenance standards.
Have SOPs in place to reduce stormwater impacts associated with runoff from municipal O&M
activities, including but not limited to streets, parking lots, roads, or highways owned or maintained by
the City, and to reduce pollutants in discharges from all lands owned or maintained by the City.
Train staff to implement the SOPs and document that training.
Prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs) for all heavy equipment maintenance or
storage yards identified for year-round facilities or yards, and material storage facilities owned or
operated by the City.
Summarize annual activities for the “Pollution Prevention and Operations and Maintenance for
Municipal Operations” component of the Annual Compliance Report; identify any updates to the
SWMP.
7.2 Current Compliance Activities
The current compliance activities associated with the Permit include:
The City operates an O&M program intended to minimize pollutant runoff from municipal
operations.
The City is implementing the stormwater maintenance standards listed in the Stormwater Management
Manual.
RES.A Page 64 of 113
7. Pollution Prevention and O&M for Municipal Operations City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
The City conducts and records the necessary maintenance operations identified based on inspections
of stormwater facilities and catch basins. The City performs spot checks of potentially damaged
permanent treatment and flow control facilities after storm events.
M&O staff involved with pesticides, pest management, and erosion and sediment control, receive
training in these areas. The City has developed procedures for these activities.
The City has developed Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans for applicable City facilities.
Public streets are swept on a regular schedule.
7.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
Table 7-1 presents the work plan for 2013 SWMP activities related to pollution prevention and operations
and maintenance for municipal operations.
Table 7-1. 2013 Pollution Prevention and Operations and Maintenance Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Responsible Schedule Notes
PPOM-1 Conduct annual inspection of all treatment and flow
control (other than catch basins) in the public system.
Utilities
Engineering On-going
PPOM-2
Inspect 20% of the public catch basins before July 31,
2013 and perform maintenance as triggered by the
maintenance standards.
M&O On-going
PPOM-3
Summarize annual activities for "Pollution Prevention
and Operation and Maintenance" component of
annual report; identify any updates to SWMP.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
PPOM-4 Perform street sweeping. M&O Ongoing
RES.A Page 65 of 113
1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
CITY OF AUBURN 2013
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
8. MONITORING
This section describes the Permit requirements related to water quality monitoring, including descriptions of
the City’s current and planned compliance activities for 2013.
8.1 Permit Requirements
The Permit (Section S8) does not require municipalities to conduct water quality sampling or other testing
during this permit term, with the following exceptions:
Sampling or testing required for characterizing illicit discharges pursuant to the SWMP’s IDDE
conditions.
Water quality monitoring required for compliance with Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
conditions (water quality clean up plans). The current Permit does not require that Auburn perform
TMDL-related monitoring.
The City is required to provide the following monitoring and/or assessment data in each annual report:
A description of any stormwater monitoring or studies conducted by the City during the reporting
period. If stormwater monitoring was conducted on behalf of the City, or if studies or investigations
conducted by other entities were reported to the City, a brief description of the type of information
gathered or received shall be included in the annual report.
An assessment of the appropriateness of the best management practices identified by the City for each
component of the SWMP; and any changes made, or anticipated to be made, to the BMPs that were
previously selected to implement the SWMP and why.
8.2 Current Compliance Activities
Although not required in the current Permit, the City is performing wet weather fecal coliform monitoring of
stormwater discharge to a tributary of the White River as part of the approved Puyallup River Watershed
Fecal Coliform TMDL.
8.3 Planned 2013 Compliance Activities
Table 8-1 presents the work plan for 2013 SWMP monitoring activities.
RES.A Page 66 of 113
8: Monitoring City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
Table 8-1. 2013 Water Quality Monitoring Work Plan
Task ID Task Description Lead Compliance
Timeframe
MNTR -1
Participate in regional and state monitoring forums
and future legislative actions in order to influence
development of feasible and effective alternative
future monitoring requirements.
Utilities
Engineering Continue participation.
MNTR -2
Summarize annual monitoring activities for the Annual
Report; identify any updates to SWMP including
identification of sites selected for monitoring and a
summary of proposed questions for effectiveness
monitoring, purpose, design and methods.
Utilities
Engineering
The SWMP and Annual
Compliance Report submittal
is due on or before March
31st of each year.
MNTR-3
Continue wet weather fecal coliform monitoring in
conjunction with the Puyallup River Watershed Fecal
Coliform TMDL.
Utilities
Engineering Through April 2013
RES.A Page 67 of 113
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
APPENDIX A
Acronyms and Definitions
RES.A Page 68 of 113
Appendix A: Acronyms and Definitions City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
A-1
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
The following definitions and acronyms are taken directly from the Phase II Permit and are reproduced here
for the reader’s convenience.
AKART means all known, available, and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment. All
known, available and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment refers to the State
Water Pollution Control Act, Chapter 90.48.010 and 90.48.520 RCW.
Basin Plan is a surface water management process consisting of three parts: a scientific study of the basin’s
drainage features and their quality; developing actions and recommendations for resolving any deficiencies
discovered during the study; and implementing the recommendations, followed by monitoring.
Best Management Practices ("BMPs") are the schedules of activities, prohibitions of practices,
maintenance procedures, and structural and/or managerial practices approved by the Department that, when
used singly or in combination, prevent or reduce the release of pollutants and other adverse impacts to waters
of Washington State.
BMP means Best Management Practice.
CFR means Congressional Federal Register.
Component or Program Component means an element of the Stormwater Management Program listed in
S5 Stormwater Management Program for Cities, Towns, and Counties or S6 Stormwater Management
Program for Secondary Permittees of this permit.
CWA means Clean Water Act (formerly referred to as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act or Federal
Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972) Pub.L. 92-500, as amended Pub. L. 95-217, Pub. L. 95-
576, Pub. L. (6-483 and Pub. L. 97-117, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
Discharge for the purpose of this permit means, unless indicated otherwise, any discharge from a MS4
owned or operated by the permittee.
Ecology’s Western Washington Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit regulates discharges from
municipal separate storm sewers owned or operated by Clark, King, Pierce and Snohomish Counties, and the
cities of Seattle and Tacoma.
Ecology’s Western Washington Phase II Municipal Stormwater Permit covers certain "small"
municipal separate stormwater sewer systems.
Entity means another governmental body, or public or private organization, such as another permittee, a
conservation district, or volunteer organization.
Equivalent document means a technical stormwater management manual developed by a state agency, local
government or other entity that includes the Minimum Technical Requirements in Appendix 1 of this Permit.
The Department may conditionally approve manuals that do not include the Minimum Technical
Requirements in Appendix 1; in general, the Best Management Practices included in those documents may be
applied at new development and redevelopment sites, but the Minimum Technical Requirements in Appendix
1 must still be met.
Heavy equipment maintenance or storage yard means an uncovered area where any heavy equipment,
such as mowing equipment, excavators, dump trucks, backhoes, or bulldozers are washed or maintained, or
where at least five pieces of heavy equipment are stored.
Illicit connection means any man-made conveyance that is connected to a municipal separate storm sewer
without a permit, excluding roof drains and other similar type connections. Examples include sanitary sewer
RES.A Page 69 of 113
Appendix A: Acronyms and Definitions City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
A-2
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
connections, floor drains, channels, pipelines, conduits, inlets, or outlets that are connected directly to the
municipal separate storm sewer system.
Illicit discharge means any discharge to a municipal separate storm sewer that is not composed entirely of
storm water except discharges pursuant to a NPDES permit (other than the NPDES permit for discharges
from the municipal separate storm sewer) and discharges resulting from fire fighting activities.
IDDE means Illicit discharge detection and elimination.
Low Impact Development (LID) means a stormwater management and land development strategy applied
at the parcel and subdivision scale that emphasizes conservation and use of on-site natural features integrated
with engineered, small-scale hydrologic controls to more closely mimic pre-development hydrologic
functions.
Major Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Outfall means a municipal separate storm sewer outfall from a
single pipe with an inside diameter of 36 inches or more, or its equivalent (discharge from a single conveyance
other than circular pipe which is associated with a drainage area of more than 50 acres); or for municipal
separate storm sewers that receive stormwater from lands zoned for industrial activity (based on
comprehensive zoning plans or the equivalent), an outfall that discharges from a single pipe with an inside
diameter of 12 inches or more or from its equivalent (discharge from other than a circular pipe associated
with a drainage area of 12 acres or more).
Material Storage Facilities means an uncovered area where bulk materials (liquid, solid, granular, etc.) are
stored in piles, barrels, tanks, bins, crates, or other means.
Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP) refers to paragraph 402(p)(3)(B)(iii) of the federal Clean Water Act
which reads as follows: Permits for discharges from municipal storm sewers shall require controls to reduce
the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable, including management practices, control
techniques, and system, design, and engineering methods, and other such provisions as the Administrator or
the State determines appropriate for the control of such pollutants.
MEP means Maximum Extent Practicable.
MS4 – see Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System.
MTRs means Minimum Technical Requirements.
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) means a conveyance, or system of conveyances (including
roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels, or
storm drains):
(i) owned or operated by a state, city, town, borough, county, parish, district, association, or other public body
(created by or pursuant to state law) having jurisdiction over
disposal of wastes, storm water, or other wastes, including special districts under state law such as a sewer
district, flood control district or drainage district, or similar entity, or an Indian tribe or an authorized Indian
tribal organization, or a designated and approved management agency under section 208 of the CWA that
discharges to waters of the United States.
(ii) designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater.
(iii) which is not a combined sewer; and (iv) which is not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works
(POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2.
RES.A Page 70 of 113
Appendix A: Acronyms and Definitions City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
A-3
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) means the national program for issuing,
modifying, revoking, and reissuing, terminating, monitoring and enforcing permits, and imposing and
enforcing pretreatment requirements, under sections 307, 402, 318, and 405 of the Federal Clean Water Act,
for the discharge of pollutants to surface waters of the state from point sources. These permits are referred to
as NPDES permits and, in Washington State, are administered by the Washington Department of Ecology.
Notice of Intent (NOI) means the application for, or a request for coverage under this General Permit
pursuant to WAC 173-226-200.
Outfall means point source as defined by 40 CFR 122.2 at the point where a municipal separate storm sewer
discharges to waters of the State and does not include open conveyances connecting two municipal separate
storm sewer systems, or pipes, tunnels, or other conveyances which connect segments of the same stream or
other waters of the State and are used to convey waters of the State.
O&M means Operations and Maintenance.
Permittee unless otherwise noted, the term “Permittee” includes Permittee, Co-Permittee, and Secondary
Permittee, as defined below:
(i) A “Permittee” is a city, town, or county owning or operating a regulated small MS4 applying and receiving
a permit as a single entity.
(ii) A “Co-Permittee” is any operator of a regulated small MS4 that is applying jointly with another applicant
for coverage under this Permit. Co-Permittees own or operate a regulated small MS4 located within or
adjacent to another regulated small MS4.
(iii) A “Secondary Permittee” is an operator of regulated small MS4 that is not a city, town, or county.
Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System or Small MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances
for municipalities having populations of less that 100,000 according to the 1990 US census. Such systems
include road drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, man-made channels,
and/or storm drains that are:
a. Owned or operated by a city, town, county, district, association or other public body created
pursuant to State law having jurisdiction over disposal of sewage, industrial wastes, stormwater, or other
wastes, including special districts under state law such as a sewer districts, flood control districts or drainage
districts, or similar entity.
b. Designed or used for collecting or conveying stormwater.
c. Not a combined sewer system,
d. Not part of a Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTW) as defined at 40 CFR 122.2.
e. Not defined as “large” or “medium” pursuant to 40 CFR 122.26(b)(4) & (7) or designated under
40 CFR 122.26 (a)(1)(v).
Small MS4s include systems similar to separate storm sewer systems in municipalities such as: universities,
large publicly owned hospitals, prison complexes, highways and other thoroughfares. Storm sewer systems in
very discrete areas such as individual buildings do not require coverage under this Permit.
Small MS4s do not include storm drain systems operated by non-governmental entities such as: individual
buildings, private schools, private colleges, private universities, and industrial and commercial entities.
RES.A Page 71 of 113
Appendix A: Acronyms and Definitions City of Auburn 2013 SWMP
A-4
H:\PUB_WRKS\Utilities\Storm\NPDES II\Administration\SWMPs\2013 SWMP\2013 Auburn SWMP Final Draft.docx
SOP means standard operating procedure.
Stormwater means runoff during and following precipitation and snowmelt events, including surface runoff
and drainage.
Stormwater Associated with Industrial and Construction Activity means the discharge from any
2conveyance which is used for collecting and conveying stormwater, which is directly related to
manufacturing, processing or raw materials storage areas at an industrial plant, or associated with clearing
grading and/or excavation, and is required to have an NPDES permit in accordance with 40 CFR 122.26.
Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington means the 5-volume technical manual
(Publication Nos. 99-11 through 15 for the 2001 version and Publication Nos. 05-10-029-033 for the 2005
version (The 2005 version replaces the 2001 version) prepared by Ecology for use by local governments that
contains BMPs to prevent, control, or treat pollution in storm water.
Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) means a set of actions and activities designed to reduce the
discharge of pollutants from the regulated small MS4 to the maximum extent practicable and to protect water
quality, and comprising the components listed in S5 or S6 of this Permit and any additional actions necessary
to meet the requirements of applicable.
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) is a calculation of the maximum amount of a pollutant that a
waterbody can receive and still meet water quality standards,
RES.A Page 72 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4926
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4926
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Municipal Services Committee to recommend City Council Adopt Resolution No. 4926.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn has historically been a part of the King County Regional Hazard
Mitigation Plan, dating back to 2004. A locally adopted hazard mitigation plan is required
under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000. The 2009 plan is the most currently adopted
plan for King County, with the next major revision expected in 2014. A comprehensive
local Annex is required for inclusion in the Regional plan. The 2009 plan has been
approved by FEMA, as required by law. FEMA has notified us in writing that our Annex
will be approved by them in its current form upon adoption by City Council. Upon
adoption, the City becomes eligible for federal Hazard Mitigation Grants.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Municipal Services, Public Works
Councilmember:Peloza Staff:Miller
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 73 of 113
-------------------------
Resolution No. 4926
March 8, 2013
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 4926
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF
THE 2009 KING COUNTY REGIONAL HAZARD MITIGATION
PLAN AND THE CITY OF AUBURN ANNEX TO THE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn and other jurisdictions within King
County, State of Washington, have expressed a cooperative interest in disaster
mitigation planning efforts; and
WHEREAS, the City supports disaster mitigation efforts and regional
disaster planning; and
WHEREAS, a locally adopted plan reviewed and approved by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is required under the
Disaster Mitigation Act of 200, 44 CFR 201; and
WHEREAS, regular revisions and updates are required by FEMA; and
WHEREAS, FEMA has reviewed the plan proposed for adoption and
approved it pending adoption by Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose. The City Council of the City of Auburn does
hereby adopt the 2009 King County Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan and the
City of Auburn Annex.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby
authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary
to carry out the directions of this resolution.
DI.A Page 74 of 113
-------------------------
Resolution No. 4926
March 8, 2013
Page 2 of 2
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in
full force upon passage and signatures hereon.
DATED AND SIGNED THIS ________ DAY OF APRIL, 2013.
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
______________________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.A Page 75 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 4918
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Resolution No. 4918
Modified TIP #25
Vicinity Maps
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 4918.
Background Summary:
The purpose of this Resolution is for the City Council to amend the 2013-2018
Transportation Improvement Program, to add a new project for which the City has
received grant funding.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works
Councilmember:Backus Staff:Webb
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 76 of 113
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4918
February 14, 2013
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 4918
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE 2013-2018 SIX-YEAR
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN PURSUANT TO RCW CHAPTER 35.77
WHEREAS, The City of Auburn was identified by the Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) as a candidate eligible for up to
$502,275.00 through the Quick Response Safety Program; and
WHEREAS, the City submitted a grant application on December 26,
2012 for Citywide Guardrail Improvements which detailed a proposal to install
new guardrail along several corridors to improve safety; and
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2013, the City of Auburn was provided
notification by the Washington State Department of Transportation that an
award in the amount of $502,275.00 was granted based on an application
submitted; and
WHEREAS, as part of the award, the City is required to add the project
to the 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the
Washington State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) in order to be
eligible to obligate the awarded funds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.77.010, a public hearing to consider
amending the 2013-2018 Transportation Improvement Program for the City of
DI.B Page 77 of 113
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4918
February 14, 2013
Page 2
Auburn was held on March 18, 2012 at the hour of 7:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant to notice published in the legal
newspaper of the City of Auburn on March 8, 2012; and
WHEREAS, said amendment to the 2013-2018 Transportation
Improvement Program of the City of Auburn was approved by the City Council
by motion duly made and carried in said hearing.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. There is attached hereto and denominated as Exhibit “A” and
the terms of which are incorporated herewith by reference as though fully set
forth, a designation of the streets within the corporate limits of the City of
Auburn to be improved in the manner therein set forth during the year set for
the improvement of such street or streets.
Section 2. That the City Engineer of the City of Auburn is hereby
directed to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Washington State
Department of Transportation for filing not more than thirty (30) days after the
adoption of this Resolution.
Section 3. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of
this legislation.
DI.B Page 78 of 113
---------------------------
Resolution No. 4918
February 14, 2013
Page 3
Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
DATED this ____ day of April, 2013
CITY OF AUBURN
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
______________________
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_____________________
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
DI.B Page 79 of 113
ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan
Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2013-2018 Special Revenue Fund
Project Title: Citywide Guardrail Improvements TIP # 25
Project No:cp0912
Project Type:Safety (Non-Capacity)
Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 36
Budget: 2012YTD Actual20132012 Budget
BudgetExpendituresBudgetBalance
- - - -
- - - -
- - - -
Activity:
(Previous Yrs)2012 YE 2013 Year EndTotal Project
Funding Sources:Prior to 2012Estimate2013 Budget2014 BudgetProject TotalCost
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 50,000 - 50,000 50,000
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 502,275 - 502,275 502,275
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - 552,275 - 552,275 552,275
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - 50,000 - 50,000 50,000
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - 502,275 - 502,275 502,275
- - 552,275 - 552,275 552,275
TotalExpenditures
20152016201720182013-2018Beyond 2018
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 50,000 -
Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 502,275 -
REET - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - -
Other Sources - - - - - -
- - - - 552,275 -
Capital Expenditures:
Design - - - - 50,000 -
Right of Way - - - - - -
Construction - - - - 502,275 -
- - - - 552,275 -
Grants / Other Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Budget Amendments
Adjusted Budget
Total Funding Sources:
Total Expenditures:
Forecasted Project Cost:
Total Funding Sources:
Description:
The project will install guardrail along the Green River Road SE, R Street SE/Kersey Way SE, and Mountainview Drive SW corridors.
Progress Summary:
Grant funding for construction was awarded February 1st with no local match requirement. The project will be designed and constructed
during 2013.
Future Impact on Operating Budget:
This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.
Adopted Budget
DI.B Page 80 of 113
DI.B Page 81 of 113
DI.B Page 82 of 113
DI.B Page 83 of 113
DI.B Page 84 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Corps FPMS Study Design Flood Hydrographs for the Green
River Basin
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Corps FPMS Study Overview
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
For discussion only.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 85 of 113
Overview of Corps FPMS Study
Design Flood Hydrographs for
the Green River Basin
Ken Brettmann, P.E.
Seattle District
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
DI.D Page 86 of 113
Presentation Overview
•Brief overview of Green River flood events
and operation of Howard Hanson dam
during flood events
•Overview of Corps Design Flood
Hydrograph study
•Questions
DI.D Page 87 of 113
Study Purpose
•Study performed at the request of King
County
•Study performed under Corps’ Flood Plain
Management Services (FPMS) Program
•Study was 100% federally funded
•Stakeholder interest high for events in
which flows at Auburn are expected to
exceed 12,000 cfs
DI.D Page 88 of 113
Green River Flood Risk Management
Operations
•Green River flood risk management is
provided by operations at Howard Hanson
dam and by the downstream levee system
•Typical Green River flood season is
November through February
•Flooding is driven by heavy rain associated
with “atmospheric rivers” (a.k.a. pineapple
express)
DI.D Page 89 of 113
DI.D Page 90 of 113
DI.D Page 91 of 113
Howard Hanson Flood Risk
Management Operations
•The reservoir is typically kept empty during flood
season in preparation for a flood event
•Primary control point for operations is the USGS
gage in Auburn. Target operations are to not
exceed a maximum flow of 12,000 cfs at this
location
•Official flood flow for the Green River is 9,000
cfs (Middle Green River flood concerns)
•Primary purpose is to manage flood risk; prevent
loss of life and minimize property damage
DI.D Page 92 of 113
Study Overview
•Development of basin hydrographs
•Use of Corps Water Control Manual to
simulate Howard Hanson dam operations
during flood events and obtain reservoir
outflow hydrographs
•Use of unsteady, 1-D hydraulic model to
route reservoir outflow to Auburn
•Results incorporate hydrologic and
hydraulic uncertaintyDI.D Page 93 of 113
DI.D Page 94 of 113
DI.D Page 95 of 113
DI.D Page 96 of 113
DI.D Page 97 of 113
DI.D Page 98 of 113
DI.D Page 99 of 113
DI.D Page 100 of 113
DI.D Page 101 of 113
DI.D Page 102 of 113
DI.D Page 103 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Capital Project Status Report
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Capital Project Status Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached report.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 104 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
1
CP
0
9
2
1
Bi
-
A
n
n
u
a
l
S
a
n
i
t
a
r
y
S
e
w
e
r
R
e
p
a
i
r
&
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
a
i
r
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
sa
n
i
t
a
r
y
s
e
w
e
r
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
i
e
s
(
m
a
n
h
o
l
e
s
,
pi
p
e
s
,
e
t
c
.
)
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
-
7
8
,
1
0
4
8
3
5
,
6
3
5
4
,
4
2
4
1
3
,
3
8
9
(3
2
8
)
93
1
,
5
5
2
6
6
0
,
9
3
6
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
2
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
2
L
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
2
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
n
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
ac
a
d
e
m
y
d
r
i
v
e
S
e
,
3
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
,
an
d
3
6
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
.
-
24
7
,
6
2
2
2
4
7
,
6
2
2
2
4
7
,
6
2
2
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
L
e
e
F
i
n
a
l
P
a
y
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s.
3
C2
0
7
A
'A
'
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
-
P
h
a
s
e
1
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
an
d
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
w
i
t
h
th
e
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
c
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
‘
A
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
NW
f
r
o
m
1
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
s
o
u
t
h
t
o
3
r
d
St
r
e
e
t
N
W
.
-
1
,
2
0
2
,
5
2
6
(1
0
2
a
n
d
T
I
F
)
40
5
,
9
9
3
1
2
,
1
8
8
6
,
5
8
0
,
7
4
0
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
s
)
1,
2
8
5
,
1
7
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
I
n
-
Ki
n
d
)
40
7
,
5
6
0
(D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
)
9,
8
9
4
,
1
7
7
9
,
6
5
4
,
0
0
9
1
0
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
1
1
0
0
%
J
a
n
-
1
3
G
a
u
b
F
i
n
a
l
P
a
y
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
4
CP
0
8
1
7
20
0
9
S
e
w
e
r
&
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
-
P
h
a
s
e
C
,
W
h
i
t
e
Ri
v
e
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
an
d
r
e
p
a
i
r
s
a
t
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
s
t
o
r
m
pu
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
.
-
2,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
6
,
5
7
1
2
,
3
0
4
,
5
9
3
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
1
0
9
9
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Pu
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
.
P
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
is
a
l
l
t
h
a
t
r
e
m
a
i
n
s
.
5
CP
0
9
0
9
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
St
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
Hi
l
l
s
w
a
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
me
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
-
2
,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
2
,
7
6
0
,
9
8
2
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
0
9
9
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
P
u
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
es
s
.
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
me
e
t
f
i
r
e
f
l
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
6
MS
1
2
0
3
15
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
W
a
n
d
W
e
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
S
i
g
n
a
l
#
1
2
8
R
e
p
a
i
r
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
d
a
m
a
g
e
d
si
g
n
a
l
p
o
l
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
i
s
s
p
a
n
w
i
r
e
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
-
6
0
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
e
r
a
l
)
60
,
0
0
0
6
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
9
9
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
N
u
t
t
e
r
W
o
r
k
i
s
n
e
a
r
l
y
c
o
m
p
l
et
e
.
7
C4
1
0
A
S.
2
7
7
t
h
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
a
n
o
n
-
g
o
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
a
n
d
ma
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
o
f
t
h
e
w
e
t
l
a
n
d
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
si
t
e
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
S
.
2
7
7
t
h
G
r
a
d
e
S
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
S
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
N
o
r
t
h
(N
o
S
u
g
g
e
s
t
i
o
n
s
)
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
a
n
d
a
t
t
h
e
co
r
n
e
r
o
f
4
4
t
h
S
t
N
W
a
n
d
F
r
o
n
t
a
g
e
Ro
a
d
.
P
e
r
m
i
t
s
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
t
o
mo
n
i
t
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
t
e
s
f
o
r
1
0
y
e
a
r
s
.
-
2
9
4
,
8
1
7
29
4
,
8
1
7
2
8
4
,
9
6
0
1
0
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
1
9
8
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
th
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
i
n
t
h
e
1
-
y
e
a
r
p
l
a
n
t
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
p
e
r
i
o
d
a
n
d
t
h
e
f
i
n
i
s
h
d
a
t
e
re
f
l
e
c
t
s
t
h
i
s
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
a
n
d
C
o
s
t
s
s
h
o
w
n
i
s
ar
e
f
o
r
y
e
a
r
s
2
0
0
6
t
h
r
u
2
0
1
3
o
f
t
h
i
s
1
0
y
e
a
r
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
B
u
d
g
e
t
f
o
r
2
0
1
3
o
n
l
y
i
s
$
2
5
,
0
0
0
.
8
CP
1
1
0
3
13
2
n
d
A
v
e
S
E
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
In
t
e
r
t
i
e
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
o
n
1
3
2
n
d
Av
e
S
E
a
n
d
t
h
e
T
a
c
o
m
a
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
5
f
o
r
th
e
p
u
r
c
h
a
s
e
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
f
r
o
m
a
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
pu
r
v
e
y
o
r
s
.
-
1
,
2
7
6
,
0
2
4
1,
2
7
6
,
0
2
4
1
,
2
0
4
,
5
6
3
1
0
0
%
F
e
b
-
1
2
9
3
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
a
r
t
u
p
a
n
d
pu
n
c
h
l
i
s
t
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
9
C5
2
4
A
SC
A
D
A
S
y
s
t
e
m
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
'
s
SC
A
D
A
s
y
s
t
e
m
t
o
m
e
e
t
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
go
a
l
s
.
-
2
,
6
6
6
,
2
0
0
1
,
9
9
4
,
5
0
0
1
,
0
1
4
,
0
0
0
5
,
6
7
4
,
7
0
0
4
,
9
9
8
,
5
1
2
1
0
0
%
N
o
v
-
0
9
8
6
%
J
u
n
-
1
3
L
e
e
Im
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
e
x
e
c
u
t
e
d
.
Pr
e
l
i
m
i
n
a
r
y
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
F
i
n
a
l
D
e
s
i
g
n
a
r
e
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
I
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
s
a
t
M&
O
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
c
o
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
o
f
a
l
l
3
te
s
t
s
i
t
e
s
a
r
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
T
h
e
r
e
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
s
i
t
e
co
n
v
e
r
s
i
o
n
s
a
r
e
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
w
i
t
h
1
1
si
t
e
s
o
f
37
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
Pa
g
e
1
o
f
6
DI.E Page 105 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
10
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
Tr
a
n
s
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
L
i
n
e
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
h
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
o
f
a
la
r
g
e
r
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
w
a
t
e
r
li
n
e
s
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
S
i
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
Ho
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
W
e
l
l
1
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
al
s
o
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
l
i
n
e
o
n
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
t
o
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
t
h
e
W
e
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
-
1
,
9
4
3
,
6
9
7
8
3
1
,
9
0
4
2
,
7
7
5
,
6
0
1
2
,
0
3
1
,
8
5
6
1
0
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
2
8
6
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
L
e
e
W
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
D
a
y
t
i
m
e
c
l
o
s
u
r
e
o
f
M
St
r
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
A
W
S
t
o
1
2
t
h
S
t
S
E
a
r
e
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
h
e
w
e
e
k
o
f
3
/
1
8
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
pe
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
.
11
C2
0
1
A
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
U
n
d
e
r
p
a
s
s
(
G
r
a
d
e
Se
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Th
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
o
g
r
a
d
e
se
p
a
r
a
t
e
‘
M
’
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
Bu
r
l
i
n
g
t
o
n
N
o
r
t
h
e
r
n
S
a
n
t
a
F
e
St
a
m
p
e
d
e
P
a
s
s
R
a
i
l
l
i
n
e
i
n
P
h
a
s
e
1
an
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
A
u
b
u
r
n
B
l
a
c
k
Di
a
m
o
n
d
R
o
a
d
B
y
p
a
s
s
c
o
n
n
e
c
t
i
o
n
i
s
a
fu
t
u
r
e
p
h
a
s
e
.
-
5
,
1
6
6
,
5
6
0
1
5
0
,
0
0
0
8
7
2
,
3
7
2
(F
e
d
G
r
a
n
t
)
6,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
M
S
I
B
)
2,
8
5
6
,
6
1
1
(T
I
B
)
1,
3
3
5
,
0
7
9
(K
i
n
g
C
t
y
)
1,
5
4
2
,
8
0
0
(P
o
r
t
s
)
47
8
,
0
0
0
(B
N
S
F
)
1,
1
4
0
,
0
0
0
(R
E
E
T
2
)
2,
7
7
2
,
7
5
2
(P
W
T
F
)
22
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
2
2
,
3
1
4
,
1
7
4
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
1
7
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
o
a
d
C
l
o
s
u
r
e
i
n
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
Ma
y
2
0
1
3
,
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
d
e
p
e
n
d
a
n
t
.
B
N
S
F
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
t
h
e
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
d
i
n
g
tr
a
c
k
s
a
n
d
t
r
a
i
n
s
a
r
e
n
o
w
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
o
v
e
r
th
e
n
e
w
b
r
i
d
g
e
.
T
h
e
M
a
i
n
l
i
n
e
t
r
a
c
k
s
h
a
v
e
be
e
n
r
e
m
o
v
e
d
a
n
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
2
n
d
br
i
d
g
e
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
w
i
t
h
g
i
r
d
e
r
s
t
o
b
e
s
e
t
i
n
Mi
d
t
o
l
a
t
e
A
p
r
i
l
.
12
CP
0
9
0
9
Ac
a
d
e
m
y
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
u
p
d
a
t
e
/
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
p
u
m
p
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
i
n
t
h
e
A
c
a
d
e
m
y
wa
t
e
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
r
e
a
i
n
o
r
d
e
r
t
o
m
e
e
t
f
i
r
e
fl
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
-
3
,
5
2
6
,
2
5
5
3,
5
2
6
,
2
5
5
3
,
1
6
8
,
2
9
5
1
0
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
2
5
%
A
p
r
-
1
4
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
W
o
r
k
i
s
i
n
s
u
s
p
e
n
s
i
o
n
w
a
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
pr
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
i
s
n
o
t
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
be
g
i
n
u
n
t
i
l
A
p
r
i
l
d
u
e
t
o
t
h
i
s
.
fl
o
w
d
e
m
a
n
d
s
.
13
CP
1
1
0
8
20
1
1
/
1
2
/
1
3
C
i
t
y
w
i
d
e
S
t
o
r
m
P
o
n
d
Cl
e
a
n
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
r
e
m
o
v
a
l
of
s
e
d
i
m
e
n
t
f
r
o
m
u
p
t
o
1
6
s
t
o
r
m
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
p
o
n
d
s
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
Ci
t
y
a
n
d
c
l
e
a
n
t
h
e
d
i
t
c
h
a
l
o
n
g
A
S
t
r
e
e
t
SE
/
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
.
1
50
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
9
5
%
N
/
A
O
c
t
-
1
3
L
e
e
W
o
r
k
i
s
b
e
i
n
g
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
e
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
Ro
a
d
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
.
14
CP
1
1
1
8
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
t
o
F
i
r
St
r
e
e
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
s
t
r
e
e
t
li
g
h
t
i
n
g
s
y
s
t
e
m
,
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
d
m
e
d
i
a
n
is
l
a
n
d
,
a
d
e
s
i
g
n
a
t
e
d
m
i
d
-
0
b
l
o
c
k
cr
o
s
s
w
a
l
k
,
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
u
t
i
l
i
t
y
po
l
e
s
,
a
n
d
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
si
g
n
a
l
a
t
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
S
t
.
T
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
al
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
a
p
u
b
l
i
c
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
el
e
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
s
a
f
e
t
y
.
1
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
4
0
,
8
3
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
94
0
,
8
3
0
1
,
0
8
5
,
7
3
0
8
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
15
CP
1
1
1
9
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
C
o
r
r
i
d
o
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
F
i
r
S
t
.
S
E
t
o
He
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
S
E
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
w
i
d
e
n
A
W
S
b
e
t
w
e
e
n
Fi
r
a
n
d
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
f
r
o
m
3
l
a
n
e
s
to
5
l
a
n
e
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
s
n
e
w
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
,
st
r
e
e
t
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
an
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
e
w
s
i
g
n
a
l
a
t
H
e
m
l
o
c
k
S
t
.
1
8
4
9
2
,
4
2
6
,
4
0
0
(T
I
B
)
60
6
,
6
0
0
(M
I
T
)
3,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
3
,
0
3
3
,
8
4
9
8
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
O
c
t
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pa
g
e
2
o
f
6
DI.E Page 106 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
16
CP
1
2
0
7
D
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
U
t
i
l
i
t
y
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
(P
o
r
t
o
f
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
M
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
)
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
s
t
o
r
m
,
s
e
w
e
r
,
wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
r
e
e
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
to
t
h
e
P
o
r
t
o
f
S
e
a
t
t
l
e
m
i
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
ag
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
D
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
.
1
1
3
5
,
0
0
0
3
3
7
,
7
9
7
2
,
7
9
6
4
2
,
2
0
0
(4
3
0
P
o
r
t
M
i
t
)
16
2
,
2
0
3
(4
3
1
P
o
r
t
M
i
t
)
59
7
,
2
0
4
(4
3
2
P
o
r
t
M
i
t
)
1,
2
7
7
,
2
0
0
1
,
2
7
7
,
2
0
0
7
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
17
CP
0
9
1
5
We
l
l
1
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
-
W
e
l
l
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
o
r
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
W
e
l
l
1
s
o
t
h
a
t
i
t
c
a
n
f
u
n
c
t
i
o
n
a
t
f
u
l
l
ca
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
th
e
H
o
w
a
r
d
R
o
a
d
C
o
r
r
o
s
i
o
n
C
o
n
t
r
o
l
Fa
c
i
l
i
t
y
.
1
2
,
4
7
6
,
5
6
8
2,
4
7
6
,
5
6
8
2
,
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
5
9
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
L
e
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
18
CP
1
1
0
7
Fu
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
b
e
d
o
n
e
i
n
p
h
a
s
e
s
.
Th
e
f
i
r
s
t
p
h
a
s
e
1
A
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
in
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
F
u
l
m
e
r
W
e
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
ar
e
a
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
an
d
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
n
e
e
d
e
d
t
o
u
t
i
l
i
z
e
th
e
f
u
l
l
w
a
t
e
r
r
i
g
h
t
s
.
P
h
a
s
e
1
B
w
i
l
l
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
d
r
i
l
l
i
n
g
a
n
d
t
e
s
t
i
n
g
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
as
w
e
l
l
a
s
a
n
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
s
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
.
Ph
a
s
e
2
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
p
h
y
s
i
c
a
l
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
.
1
2
,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2,
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
4
9
7
,
3
6
4
5
5
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
R
e
p
p
Th
e
e
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
c
o
s
t
s
a
r
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
P
h
a
s
e
1
A
on
l
y
a
n
d
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
w
h
e
n
t
h
i
s
p
h
a
s
e
i
s
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
an
d
p
u
m
p
t
e
s
t
d
a
t
a
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
e
v
a
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
.
Ma
y
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
m
e
n
t
d
a
t
e
i
s
f
o
r
a
c
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
t
o
dr
i
l
l
m
o
n
i
t
o
r
i
n
g
w
e
l
l
s
o
n
l
y
.
19
CP
1
1
2
0
Le
a
H
i
l
l
S
a
f
e
R
o
u
t
e
s
t
o
S
c
h
o
o
l
s
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
s
a
f
e
w
a
l
k
i
n
g
r
o
u
t
e
s
to
H
a
z
e
l
w
o
o
d
E
l
e
m
.
,
L
e
a
H
i
l
l
e
l
e
m
.
,
an
d
R
a
i
n
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
l
o
n
g
1
1
6
t
h
1
3
9
8
,
5
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
21
,
5
9
7
(P
o
l
i
c
e
&
AS
D
I
n
K
i
n
d
42
0
,
0
9
7
4
2
0
,
0
9
7
5
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
A
u
g
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
an
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
i
n
2
0
1
3
t
o
b
e
d
u
r
i
n
g
t
h
e
su
m
m
e
r
.
A
g
r
e
e
m
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
A
S
D
f
o
r
t
h
e
i
r
po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
an
d
R
a
i
n
e
r
M
i
d
d
l
e
S
c
h
o
o
l
a
l
o
n
g
1
1
6
t
h
Av
e
.
S
E
a
n
d
S
E
3
1
2
S
t
.
AS
D
I
n
K
i
n
d
Se
r
v
i
c
e
s
)
po
r
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
w
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
20
CP
1
1
0
9
20
1
1
S
t
o
r
m
P
i
p
e
l
i
n
e
R
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
Re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
,
P
h
a
s
e
2
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
t
o
r
m
dr
a
i
n
a
g
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
H
i
-
C
r
e
s
t
Dr
i
v
e
N
W
.
1
37
7
,
7
4
0
3
7
7
,
7
4
0
4
1
1
,
1
9
5
3
5
%
J
u
n
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
21
CP
1
2
2
5
We
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
P
r
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
-
15
t
h
N
W
t
o
3
7
t
h
N
W
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
o
v
e
r
l
a
y
o
f
W
V
H
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
.
1
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
5
6
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
1,
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
1
,
1
2
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
G
r
a
n
t
O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
in
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
22
CP
1
3
0
2
20
1
3
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
s
e
a
l
an
d
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
pa
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
c
h
i
p
s
e
a
l
t
r
e
a
t
m
e
n
t
s
a
n
d
ov
e
r
l
a
y
w
o
r
k
o
n
b
o
t
h
a
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
/
c
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
an
d
l
o
c
a
l
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
p
u
r
p
o
s
e
o
f
pr
e
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
1
,
5
6
4
,
2
5
0
1,
5
6
4
,
2
5
0
1
,
5
6
4
,
2
5
0
1
5
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
N
o
v
-
1
3
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
23
CP
1
1
2
2
30
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
S
t
o
r
m
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
p
l
a
c
e
t
h
e
3
0
-
i
n
c
h
st
o
r
m
d
r
a
i
n
a
g
e
l
i
n
e
a
l
o
n
g
3
0
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
NE
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
n
o
r
t
h
e
n
d
o
f
t
h
e
A
i
r
p
o
r
t
t
o
th
e
B
r
a
n
n
o
n
P
a
r
k
S
t
o
r
m
P
u
m
p
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
to
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
l
o
c
a
l
i
z
e
d
f
l
o
o
d
i
n
g
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
1
25
4
,
9
9
9
2
,
7
1
9
,
7
0
0
(P
W
T
F
)
2,
9
7
4
,
6
9
9
2
,
8
2
2
,
2
9
9
1
5
%
A
u
g
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
T
r
u
o
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
24
CP
1
1
0
4
10
4
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
&
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
U
-
T
u
r
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
ac
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
a
t
t
h
e
in
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
1
0
4
t
h
a
n
d
8
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
E
to
a
c
c
o
m
m
o
d
a
t
e
e
a
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
U
-
T
u
r
n
tr
a
f
f
i
c
.
1
2
3
2
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
.
G
r
a
n
t
)
33
2
,
0
0
0
3
4
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
%
O
c
t
-
1
3
M
a
r
-
1
4
S
w
e
e
t
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Pa
g
e
3
o
f
6
DI.E Page 107 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
S
t
r
e
e
t
F
u
n
d
s
(1
0
2
/
1
0
5
/
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
Bu
d
g
e
t
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
CA
P
I
T
A
L
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
25
CP
1
3
0
1
20
1
3
S
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
R
e
p
a
i
r
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
r
e
p
a
i
r
a
n
d
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
s
i
d
e
w
a
l
k
s
a
t
va
r
i
o
u
s
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
a
r
o
u
n
d
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
an
d
A
u
b
u
r
n
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
.
1
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
(3
2
8
F
u
n
d
)
20
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
5
%
A
u
g
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
26
CP
1
2
2
2
Ci
t
y
w
i
d
e
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
S
i
g
n
a
l
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
s
a
f
e
t
y
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
a
n
u
m
b
e
r
o
f
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
.
1
5
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
40
5
,
0
0
0
4
0
5
,
0
0
0
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
L
e
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
27
CP
1
3
0
4
37
t
h
S
t
&
B
S
t
N
W
B
N
S
F
S
i
g
n
a
l
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
r
a
i
l
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
a
t
37
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
a
n
d
B
S
t
r
e
e
t
N
W
t
o
ad
d
r
e
s
s
s
a
f
e
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
1
7
6
,
9
0
0
3
0
7
,
5
5
0
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
38
4
,
4
5
0
3
8
4
,
4
5
0
5
%
M
a
y
-
1
4
D
e
c
-
1
4
S
w
e
e
t
i
n
g
G
r
a
n
t
O
b
l
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
i
s
i
n
pr
o
c
e
s
s
.
28
CP
1
2
1
8
Au
b
u
r
n
W
a
y
S
o
u
t
h
&
R
i
v
e
r
w
a
l
k
In
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
t
o
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
AW
S
a
n
d
R
i
v
e
r
w
a
l
k
D
r
i
v
e
a
n
d
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
m
i
n
o
r
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
a
d
d
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
M
I
T
P
l
a
z
a
si
g
n
a
l
t
o
t
h
e
D
o
g
w
o
o
d
s
i
g
n
a
l
.
1
2
,
3
3
3
,
1
0
8
(F
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
2,
3
3
3
,
1
0
8
2
,
3
3
3
,
1
0
8
0
%
J
u
l
-
1
4
N
o
v
-
1
5
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
n
e
g
o
t
i
a
t
i
o
n
s
i
n
p
r
o
c
e
s
s
.
29
CP
0
7
6
5
La
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
R
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
v
a
r
i
o
u
s
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
r
e
s
e
r
v
o
i
r
,
in
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
p
a
i
n
t
i
n
g
,
s
e
i
s
m
i
c
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
,
an
d
f
a
c
i
l
i
t
y
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
2
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
40
0
,
0
0
0
4
0
0
,
0
0
0
7
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
4
S
e
p
-
1
4
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
d
e
p
e
n
d
e
n
t
u
p
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
o
f
th
e
L
a
k
e
l
a
n
d
H
i
l
l
s
B
o
o
s
t
e
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
,
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
d
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
.
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
In
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
30
CP
1
0
2
4
AW
S
a
n
d
M
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
im
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
a
t
t
h
e
i
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
p
e
r
Op
t
i
o
n
2
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
P
u
b
l
i
c
W
o
r
k
s
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
t
o
a
d
d
r
e
s
s
c
a
p
a
c
i
t
y
a
n
d
sa
f
e
t
y
c
o
n
c
e
r
n
s
.
2
2
5
0
,
0
0
0
4
5
0
,
0
0
0
(T
I
B
)
70
0
,
0
0
0
7
0
5
,
0
0
0
3
0
%
A
p
r
-
1
4
S
e
p
-
1
4
S
w
e
e
t
i
n
g
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
In
s
t
a
l
l
e
d
p
r
o
t
e
c
t
e
d
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
fo
r
e
a
s
t
/
w
e
s
t
b
o
u
n
d
t
r
a
f
f
i
c
o
n
A
W
S
t
u
r
n
i
n
g
o
n
t
o
M
S
t
.
S
E
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
17
t
h
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
-
re
s
t
r
i
c
t
l
e
f
t
t
u
r
n
m
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
fr
o
m
1
7
t
h
t
o
M
.
(
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
)
AW
S
/
M
S
t
.
S
E
I
n
t
e
r
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
-
Op
t
i
o
n
2
w
a
s
se
l
e
c
t
e
d
b
y
t
h
e
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
,
J
u
n
e
2
0
1
2
.
D
e
s
i
g
n
wo
r
k
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
a
n
d
t
h
e
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
h
a
s
b
e
e
n
up
d
a
t
e
d
t
o
r
e
f
l
e
c
t
t
h
e
g
r
a
n
t
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
f
o
r
t
h
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
31
C5
1
2
A
We
l
l
4
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
bu
i
l
d
i
n
g
t
o
h
o
u
s
e
a
s
t
a
n
d
b
y
g
e
n
e
r
a
t
o
r
an
d
d
i
s
i
n
f
e
c
t
i
o
n
e
q
u
i
p
m
e
n
t
.
2
1
,
3
0
6
,
2
8
8
1,
3
0
6
,
2
8
8
1
,
2
9
6
,
8
2
0
3
0
%
S
e
p
-
1
3
A
p
r
-
1
4
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
d
e
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
u
nd
e
r
w
a
y
.
32
C2
2
9
A
BN
S
F
/
E
V
H
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
Un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
p
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
un
d
e
r
c
r
o
s
s
i
n
g
o
f
b
o
t
h
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
Hi
g
h
w
a
y
(
A
S
t
S
E
)
a
n
d
t
h
e
B
N
S
F
r
a
i
l
tr
a
c
k
s
j
u
s
t
n
o
r
t
h
o
f
t
h
e
W
h
i
t
e
R
i
v
e
r
.
3
3
8
5
,
0
0
0
(S
t
a
t
e
)
38
5
,
0
0
0
9
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
6
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
D
u
n
s
d
o
n
Fi
n
a
l
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
n
h
o
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
B
N
S
F
i
s
s
u
e
s
.
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
s
w
i
l
l
b
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
t
o
co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
,
e
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
p
e
r
m
i
t
t
i
n
g
,
an
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
.
33
CP
0
9
0
6
20
0
9
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
a
n
e
w
ga
t
e
w
a
y
s
i
g
n
a
t
E
a
s
t
V
a
l
l
e
y
H
i
g
h
w
a
y
an
d
L
a
k
e
T
a
p
p
s
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
.
3
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
(G
e
n
F
u
n
d
)
10
0
,
0
0
0
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
0
%
H
o
l
d
H
o
l
d
L
e
e
Ea
s
e
m
e
n
t
a
c
q
u
i
s
i
t
i
o
n
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
.
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
on
h
o
l
d
.
CP
S
T
O
T
A
L
9
,
4
5
2
,
9
0
2
1
9
,
3
2
5
,
1
1
1
3
,
1
6
7
,
9
3
2
5
,
5
5
2
,
2
4
4
3
7
,
9
9
5
,
3
6
5
7
5
,
4
9
3
,
5
5
4
7
9
,
9
8
6
,
8
6
4
Pa
g
e
4
o
f
6
DI.E Page 108 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
Pr
i
o
r
i
t
y
Gr
o
u
p
(1
-
3
)
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
Fu
n
d
s
(
1
0
3
)
W
a
t
e
r
(
4
3
0
)
S
e
w
e
r
(
4
3
1
)
S
t
o
r
m
(
4
3
2
)
O
t
h
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
B
u
d
g
e
t
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
St
a
t
u
s
33 34
CP
1
2
0
1
20
1
2
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
Re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
h
a
b
i
l
i
t
a
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
b
u
i
l
d
de
f
i
c
i
e
n
t
p
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
o
n
l
o
c
a
l
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
th
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
:
J
S
t
S
E
b
t
w
n
2
n
d
a
n
d
4
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
2
2
n
d
S
t
.
S
E
b
t
w
n
M
a
n
d
R
S
t
.
S
E
2
7
t
h
/
H
/
2
8
t
h
S
t
.
S
E
E
a
s
t
o
f
F
S
t
.
S
E
Wa
t
e
r
a
n
d
s
t
o
r
m
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
w
i
l
l
a
l
s
o
be
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
o
n
t
h
e
s
e
s
t
r
e
e
t
s
.
-
1
,
3
5
0
,
0
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
1
,
9
6
8
,
5
8
0
1
,
5
6
9
,
7
2
7
1
0
0
%
J
u
n
-
1
2
9
5
%
M
a
r
-
1
3
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
Wo
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
o
n
2
2
n
d
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
a
n
d
o
n
28
t
h
/
H
/
2
7
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
.
R
o
a
d
w
a
y
w
o
r
k
on
J
S
t
r
e
e
t
S
E
i
s
s
u
s
p
e
n
d
e
d
w
a
i
t
i
n
g
o
n
ap
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
w
e
a
t
h
e
r
t
o
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
p
a
v
i
n
g
.
Ot
h
e
r
S
O
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
CP
1
2
0
6
,
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
Se
a
l
s
,
a
n
d
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
.
N/
A
5
3
9
,
5
0
0
5
3
9
,
5
0
0
5
3
9
,
5
0
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
CP
1
2
0
6
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
a
n
d
r
e
c
e
i
v
e
d
f
i
n
a
l
pa
y
m
e
n
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
b
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
1
/
7
/
2
0
1
3
.
1,
8
8
9
,
5
8
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
1
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
2
,
5
0
8
,
0
8
0
2
,
1
0
9
,
2
2
7
35
CP
1
2
2
4
20
1
3
L
o
c
a
l
S
t
r
e
e
t
R
e
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
re
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
o
f
t
h
e
f
o
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
l
o
c
a
l
ro
a
d
w
a
y
s
:
23
r
d
S
t
S
E
-
M
t
o
R
S
t
S
E
H
S
t
N
E
-
4
t
h
t
o
8
t
h
5t
h
S
t
N
E
-
H
t
o
C
u
l
-
d
e
-
s
a
c
Pa
r
k
A
v
e
-
A
W
N
t
o
P
a
r
k
Al
s
o
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
d
i
n
t
h
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
i
s
t
h
e
re
p
l
a
c
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
w
a
t
e
r
l
i
n
e
o
n
V
S
t
S
E
,
fr
o
m
2
n
d
t
o
4
t
h
S
t
S
E
.
1
2
,
4
2
5
,
0
0
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
,
3
2
5
,
0
0
0
2
,
9
3
5
,
0
0
0
2
0
%
M
a
y
-
1
3
D
e
c
-
1
3
W
i
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
C
o
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
D
e
s
i
g
n
i
s
u
n
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
Ot
h
e
r
S
O
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
:
20
1
3
P
a
v
e
m
e
n
t
P
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
,
C
h
i
p
S
e
a
l
s
,
an
d
O
v
e
r
l
a
y
s
.
N/
A
1
6
4
,
2
5
0
16
4
,
2
5
0
1
6
4
,
2
5
0
Wi
c
k
s
t
r
o
m
F
o
r
S
t
a
t
u
s
s
e
e
C
P
1
3
0
2
2,
5
8
9
,
2
5
0
5
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
-
3
,
4
8
9
,
2
5
0
3
,
0
9
9
,
2
5
0
20
1
2
&
2
0
1
3
T
O
T
A
L
S
O
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
4
,
4
7
8
,
8
3
0
1
,
0
0
0
,
0
0
0
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
3
1
8
,
5
0
0
-
5
,
9
9
7
,
3
3
0
5
,
2
0
8
,
4
7
7
20
1
3
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
T
o
t
a
l
s
20
1
2
S
O
S
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
T
o
t
a
l
s
SO
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
S
T
A
T
U
S
R
E
P
O
R
T
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
B
u
d
g
e
t
(
$
)
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
5
o
f
6
DI.E Page 109 of 113
Da
t
e
:
Ma
r
c
h
1
3
,
2
0
1
3
No
.
P
r
o
j
.
N
o
.
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
/
D
e
s
c
r
i
p
t
i
o
n
%
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
A
d
v
.
D
a
t
e
%
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Fi
n
i
s
h
Da
t
e
St
a
f
f
Ma
n
a
g
e
r
Ac
t
i
o
n
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
St
a
t
u
s
A
CP
0
6
1
6
Wa
y
f
i
n
d
i
n
g
-
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
t
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
do
w
n
t
o
w
n
P
e
d
e
s
t
r
i
a
n
K
i
o
s
k
a
n
d
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
t
h
e
s
e
st
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
s
a
t
u
p
t
o
9
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
w
i
t
h
i
n
t
h
e
D
o
w
n
t
o
w
n
ar
e
a
.
1
5
0
,
4
7
5
1
5
0
,
4
7
5
1
0
0
%
D
e
c
-
1
2
5
%
J
u
l
-
1
3
V
o
n
d
r
a
k
P
C
D
C
Wo
r
k
i
s
a
n
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
d
t
o
b
e
g
i
n
i
n
l
a
t
e
M
a
r
c
h
/
e
a
r
l
y
A
p
r
i
l
pe
n
d
i
n
g
m
a
t
e
r
i
a
l
p
r
o
c
u
r
e
m
e
n
t
.
B
CP
1
1
1
5
Ci
t
y
H
a
l
l
N
W
P
l
a
z
a
I
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
r
e
n
o
v
a
t
e
t
h
e
N
W
e
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
t
o
C
i
t
y
Ha
l
l
s
i
m
i
l
a
r
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
c
e
n
t
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
o
n
t
h
e
so
u
t
h
s
i
d
e
o
f
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
.
W
o
r
k
w
i
l
l
i
n
c
l
u
d
e
n
e
w
pa
v
e
m
e
n
t
,
u
p
d
a
t
e
d
l
i
g
h
t
i
n
g
,
A
D
A
R
a
m
p
u
p
g
r
a
d
e
s
an
d
n
e
w
C
i
t
y
H
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
4
7
5
,
9
7
7
4
5
8
,
5
7
0
9
9
%
A
p
r
-
1
3
S
e
p
-
1
3
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
l
a
i
n
P
C
D
C
Co
n
s
u
l
t
a
n
t
w
o
r
k
i
s
o
n
h
o
l
d
p
e
n
d
i
n
g
s
c
o
p
e
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
w
i
t
h
co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
o
n
L
R
F
b
o
n
d
f
u
n
d
s
.
C
CP
1
0
1
6
Fe
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
:
Th
i
s
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
w
i
l
l
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
n
e
w
l
e
v
e
e
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
s
on
t
h
e
F
e
n
s
t
e
r
L
e
v
e
e
a
l
o
n
g
t
h
e
G
r
e
e
n
R
i
v
e
r
.
9
3
9
,
1
0
0
1
,
2
6
5
,
0
0
0
6
5
%
N
/
A
A
p
r
-
1
4
A
n
d
e
r
s
e
n
P
C
D
C
Wo
r
k
w
i
l
l
b
e
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
b
y
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
.
S
e
c
u
r
e
d
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
is
f
r
o
m
4
G
r
a
n
t
s
a
n
d
m
a
t
c
h
i
n
g
s
t
o
r
m
f
u
n
d
s
.
T
h
e
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
3
2
7
k
i
n
S
R
F
B
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
w
a
s
a
w
a
r
d
e
d
.
P
r
e
-
De
s
i
g
n
w
o
r
k
i
s
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
.
T
h
e
D
e
s
i
g
n
b
y
K
i
n
g
C
o
u
n
t
y
i
s
un
d
e
r
w
a
y
.
T
O
T
A
L
O
T
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
1
,
5
6
5
,
5
5
2
1
,
8
7
4
,
0
4
5
T
o
t
a
l
B
u
d
g
e
t
OT
H
E
R
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
-
A
C
T
I
O
N
B
Y
O
T
H
E
R
C
O
M
M
I
T
T
E
E
T
o
t
a
l
Es
t
i
m
a
t
e
d
Co
s
t
s
De
s
i
g
n
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
g
e
6
o
f
6
DI.E Page 110 of 113
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Action Tracking Matrix
Date:
March 12, 2013
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Action Tracking Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached matrix.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Dowdy
Meeting Date:March 18, 2013 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 111 of 113
Updated: 3/13/2013 8:36 AM
No.Item Description Contact
Next PWC
Review Date Est. Comp.
Date Status
A Sidewalk Program Funding Sources Para 6/1/2013 PWC to review funding options with Midbiennium budget planning.
B
Track completed project on the 2012 Active
Capital Improvement Projects Map Gaub
C Fulmer Well-Field Feasibility Study Updates Repp 5/6/2013 5/6/13 Initial study finding are not yet completed.
D System Development Charges Repp 7/1/2013 9/1/13 Consultant to complete analysis
E Cost of Service Analysis Repp 11/18/2013 12/31/2013 Consultant to complete analysis
F Payback/Charge in-lieu Process Repp 3/18/2013 3/18/2013 Review current City process
G
CP1224, 2013 Local Street Pavement
Reconstruction Project Wickstrom 4/15/2013 4/15/2013 Review scope at 50% design stage
H
CP1120, Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools
Improvement Truong 4/1/2013 4/1/2013 Review scope at 50% design stage
I Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update Webb 6/3/2013 11/1/2014
Discussion of LOS Standards (Corridors: N/S vs E/W), modeling
scenarios Incorporating "Event Traffic", & safety versus efficiency
policy.
J BNSF Stampede Pass Line Para 6/3/2013 6/3/2013 Discuss Chairman Wagner's email.
K
CP1122, 30th Street NE Area Flooding - Phase
1 Truong 5/1/2013 5/1/2013 Review scope at 50% design stage
L LED Lighting Standards Para 7/15/2013 7/15/2013
Discuss research findings and current state of LED lighting
technology.
M
Auburn Valley Humane Society - Wayfinding
Signage Webb 5/6/2013 5/6/2013 PWC requested review of wayfinding signage
Public Works Committee - Action Tracking Matrix
Ongoing - Quarterly updates, next one in April
DI.F Page 112 of 113
Updated: 3/13/2013 8:36 AM
No.Item Description Contact
Next PWC
Review Date Est. Comp.
Date Status
N
4th Street SE/Cross Street and AWS
Intersection Nutter 4/1/2013 9/30/2013 Sight-distance issues when turning
O
Pedestrian Visibility Improvements on A St
NW (Northwest Post Office exit)Para 5/6/2013 5/6/2013
Staff working with Post Office for permission to place a pedestrian
warning sign on their fence by the northwestern driveway exit.
P NPDES Executive Summary Carlaw 5/6/2013 5/6/2013 Staff working to prepare the Executive Summary.
DI.F Page 113 of 113