HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-27-2013 LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS COMMITTEE AGENDA
Les Gove Community Campus
March 27, 2013 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
AGENDA
I.CALL TO ORDER
A.Roll Call
B.Announcements
C.Agenda Modifications
II.CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - February 6, 2013* (Tate)
III.DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Council Workshop - Community Center Project* (Wagner)
Discuss the format and content of a mid-April to early-May Council one-hour
workshop focused on the Community Center project.
B. National Development Council & Lorig Associates 3/14/13 Memo* (Wagner)
Discuss the National Development Council and Lorig Associates memo of March
14, 2013 outlining 3 optional project approaches for the Les Gove Community
Center.
C. Outline Committee Work Plan for the Next 12 Months* (Wagner/Faber)
Outline the Committee work plan for the next 12 months, e.g., Campus Master
Plan, Neighborhood Advisory Committee, Herr Lumber and Big Daddy's Drive-In
properties, and the Veterans and Human Services Center Project.
D. Operating and Maintenance Cost Minimization (Faber)
Discuss Operating and Maintenance cost minimization through limited operations.
Note: Any materials for this item will be provided at the meeting.
E. Director's Report (Tate)
F. LGCC Matrix* (Tate)
IV.ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 1 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes - February 6, 2013
Date:
March 20, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Minutes - February 6, 2013
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only. See attached minutes.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:CA.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDCA.A Page 2 of 31
Les Gove Community Campus
February 6, 2013 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Following a brief delay due to technical difficulties, Chair Rich Wagner
called the meeting to order at 5:18 p.m.in Annex Conference Room 2
located on the second floor of the One Main Professional Plaza, One East
Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chair Rich Wagner, Vice-Chair Largo Wales and Member Wayne
Osborne.
Staff members present were Mayor Pete Lewis; Advisor to the Mayor
Michael Hursh; Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber;
Finance Director Shelley Coleman; Planning and Development
Director Kevin Snyder; Project Construction Manager Steve Burke,
and Planning Clerk Bobbie Hodgkinson.
Members of the public present were Councilmember John Partridge;
John Finke, Senior Director, NDC-HEDC; Misty Baskett, Director,
NDC-HEDC; Meredith Messmer, Project Manager, Lorig Associates;
Joe Borden, Director of Development, Lorig Associates; Ron Harpel,
AIA, Principal, BLRB; and Scott Pondelick, Auburn resident.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no agenda modifications.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - December 11, 2012 (Snyder)
Member Wayne Osborne moved and Vice-Chair Largo Wales
seconded to approve the December 11, 2012 minutes as written.
Motion carried unanimously. 3-0
Page 1 of 4
CA.A Page 3 of 31
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Auburn Community Center at Les Gove Community Campus (Snyder)
Copies of the Les Gove Community Center Analysis &
Recommendations prepared jointly by the National Development
Council and Lorig Associates were distributed. Joe Borden, Director
of Development, Lorig Associates, provided a brief overview of the
project and began the PowerPoint presentation by
summarizing the Project Observations. He noted that the project is
well designed with essentially construction ready documents and
appears to meet its general program objectives. Mr. Borden stated
that this kind of facility is better suited to H-metal framing as opposed
to wood framing and a small premium was included to move to metal
framing construction.
Mr. Borden noted that due to the readiness of the design, the project
could be ready for this round of NMTC allocations; it would take about
4 to 5 months of start up to get the project retuned and it fits nicely
with the financing process. He clarified for the Committee that a
comprehensive value engineering exercise was done by the team who
designed the project, and a major evaluation process would not be
productive in saving a lot of money. The Committee discussed the
possibility of significant impact to the project resulting from state and
international building code changes. Mr. Borden responded that extra
contingency money was included recognizing that there may need to
be some work done to bring the building design a little more closely in
tune with building codes.
In reviewing the Development Budget - Hard Costs, Mr. Borden stated
that some growth in construction costs over the next 12 to 24 months
is expected. He noted that in the model presented, the 7.0% base line
contingency ($561,280) is associated with unknown conditions, and
the 5.0% Design Contingency ($400,914) is related to codes and
design elements recognizing that the design will have to be updated
and the need to determine whether all project design elements are still
relevant and available.
In reviewing the Development Budget - Soft Costs, Planning Director
Snyder clarified that the City would not charge itself for the building
permit but would charge impact fees and system development
charges. Director Snyder added that the Mayor has the authority to
exclude City projects from permitting fees. Mr. Borden stated
the developer fee is essentially the risk premium; the City's agreement
with NDC will be to provide a guaranteed maximum price so any cost
risk or overruns do not go to the City. John Finke, Senior Director,
NDC-HEDC, clarified that if the project comes in under budget, the
Page 2 of 4
CA.A Page 4 of 31
savings flow back to the City. Director Snyder pointed out that NDC
project management fee of 1.0% is the first of two instances where
NDC is paid. Mr. Borden stated they believe that the project is doable
at the total development cost shown with possibly 7% to 10% cost
savings as the contingencies move to certainties and the budget is
refined.
In reviewing the Financing – New Market Tax Credits (NMTC) Status
Update, Mr. Finke stated that Congress extended the NMTC program
for 2 years at 3.5 Billion per year, down from $5.0 Billion per year, with
awards made to Community Development Entities (CDEs) in April or
May and commitments to individual projects in May, June and July.
Misty Baskett added that there will likely be a need to look at CDEs
that have smaller allocations so the project may end up receiving two
allocations rather than one allocation. Mr. Finke stated in order to
begin construction in August/September of 2013, it is important to be
committed with plans, costing, and financing in place. He stated if the
financing is available and there are two CDEs with NMTC financing, it
is possible to fast track and close in approximately two 2 months. Mr.
Finke stated that the project is already listed in two NMTC CDEs,
specifically Kitsap Housing Authority and King County Housing
Authority. He added that if the project were to get all of the NMTC
from King County Housing Authority, it could expect to do better than
the 21% funding allocation.
In connection with financing, Mr. Finke explained the NMTC Flow of
Funds for the Committee focusing on timing, debt structure and
funding sources. He stated that finding and structuring the debt in a
timely fashion is most important. Mr. Finke explained that the project
will require a loan that will go to the investment fund and because the
investment fund puts equity into a CDE, equity by Treasury's definition
is not secured by risk. Therefore, the loan to the investment fund
cannot be secured by debt on the project. The project will need to
secure a loan that will not need project-specific real estate to secure
it. He noted that there are two sources of getting this debt either
through a bank loan or by the City lending the money – the latter
potentially being the most economic route. Mr. Finke discussed the
potential for the City to establish a Public Development Authority
(PDA) for the lending of money and recommended that the City speak
with qualified legal counsel regarding formation of and lending to a
PDA.
Mr. Finke, at the request of Chair Wagner, provided a more detailed
explanation on the seven (7)-year interest only program. He
discussed that when the project goes back to the City in 7 years the
City will have to retire that debt -- simply, this is to get $2.5 Million
dollars of free money. Therefore, it would be ideal for the City, in this
Page 3 of 4
CA.A Page 5 of 31
market where rates are very low, to look at taking long-term money out
in order to have those proceeds.
Meredith Messmer, Project Manager, Lorig Associates stepped the
Committee through the Operating Model income and expenses, which
assumes the City would self-manage line items above the dashed
line. She indicated that it is possible to have a hybrid approach to
reduce the debt service. Mr. Finke explained that NDC-HEDC will
need to have a conversation with King County in connection with
exemption for post- construction property taxes. Planning Director
Snyder pointed out that the Asset Management Fee is the second time
NDC will be paid for its services. He further stated that the Liability
Insurance and Annual Inspections are pass-through costs to other
third parties.
The Committee reviewed the Project Schedule. Ms. Messmer pointed
out that the timeline is tightened up to make this year's round of NMTC
funding with one month to approve this current project to avoid starting
over on the design or put the project on hold for another year.
The Committee concluded it will have discussions with the Mayor and
staff over the next couple of weeks and will need to have a workshop
to educate the rest of the City Council sometime in February or early
March. Following these discussions, the Committee requested
that Lorig Associates and NDC representatives return to answer any
questions the Committee may have.
B. Committee Matrix (Snyder)
Director Snyder asked the Committee to let staff know of any
exceptions, additions or changes to the matrix they would like staff
to amend. Director Snyder noted he will correct the formatting related
to the 9/26/2012 dates.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Committee, the
meeting was adjourned at 6:43 p.m.
APPROVED THIS __________ day of ____________, 2013
___________________________ _____________________________
Rich Wagner, Chair Bobbie Hodgkinson, Planning Clerk
Page 4 of 4
CA.A Page 6 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Council Workshop - Community Center Project
Date:
March 21, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
NDC/Lorig 2/6/13 LGCC Committee
Presentation
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached presentation.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Les Gove Community Campus
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Wagner
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.A
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.A Page 7 of 31
LES GOVE COMMUNITY CENTER
ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS
National Development Council & Lorig Associates
2.06.2013
DI.A Page 8 of 31
Project Observations
•The design is efficient and maximizes net square footage to
building gross
•Current design appears to meet program objectives in a
very straightforward manner
•Low ratio of glazing to wall area
•Construction cost/sf is well within the range of similar civic
buildings
•Sensible VE opportunities have already been incorporated
into the design
•Recommend change from wood to metal framing (included
in cost estimate)
•Project can be ready to receive 2013 NMTC allocation, for
construction start in August
DI.A Page 9 of 31
Development Budget – Hard Costs
CONSTRUCTION COSTS Notes:
GMP CONTRACT 8,018,279 Contractor estimate 12/21/12
CONTINGENCY @ 7.0% 7.00% 561,280
DESIGN CONTINGENCY 5.00% 400,914
FURNITURE, FIXTURES & EQUIPMENT
(FF&E) 225,000
Lorig estimate from drawings/operations
plan
SALES TAX @ 9.5% 9.50% 836,433
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS 10,041,906
DI.A Page 10 of 31
Development Budget – Soft Costs
SOFT COSTS Notes:
PERMITS AND FEES 92,088 Per City of Auburn email 12/12/12
ARCHITECT/ENGINEERS/CIVIL/LANDSCAPE 276,820 A&E estimate 1/8/13
OTHER CONSULTANTS 20,000 Lorig estimate for Geotech
TESTING & INSPECTIONS 65,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
SURVEY (ALTA) 13,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
ENVIRONMENTAL LEVEL 1 & HAZMAT 10,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
CONSTRUCTION DRAW INSPECTOR 25,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES 45,000 Architect & Lorig/NDC estimate
GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 17,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
TITLE INSURANCE 25,000 Lorig estimate based on past projects
LEGAL FEES 75,000 NDC estimate based on past projects
LOAN FINANCING COSTS @ .75% 69,124 Lorig estimate based on past projects
INTEREST DURING CONSTRUCTION 147,524
SOFT COST CONTINGENCY ON ABOVE ITEMS 10.00% 88,058
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2.50% 275,264
DEVELOPER FEE 2.50% 275,264
NDC PM FEE 1.00% 110,105
TOTAL SOFT COSTS 1,629,275
DI.A Page 11 of 31
Development Budget - Summary
Summary Project Costs
Construction (GMP Contract + FF&E + Sales Tax) 9,079,712
Soft Costs 1,541,617
Contingencies 1,050,252
Total Development Costs 11,671,181
DI.A Page 12 of 31
Financing – NMTC Status Update
•Congress included a 2 year extension of the NMTC program in
the American Taxpayer Relief Act signed into law on January 2,
2013
•The extension is at $3.5 billion per year down from $5 billion per
year
•Awards are anticipated to be made to CDEs in April or May
•CDEs will begin accepting projects for approval immediately
thereafter
•A condition of acceptance by CDEs will be project readiness to
close in August, September and October of 2013
•NMTC funds can provide approx. 21% of funding for this project
DI.A Page 13 of 31
Financing – NMTC Flow of Funds
Equity
NMTC Investor
Investment
Fund
(L.P. or LLC)
Debt / Lender
CDE with a
NMTC
Allocation
CDE
(Project Specific)
Load &
Reserves
QALICB
(Project)
DI.A Page 14 of 31
Financing - Sources
SOURCES – Max Bank Loan
NMTC @ 21% 2,450,948
Loan Amount 9,220,233
City of Auburn Contribution 0
State Grant 0
TOTAL SOURCES 11,671,181
DI.A Page 15 of 31
Operating Model
Construction Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7
INCOME:
Recreation Programs 0 45,000 47,250 49,613 52,093 54,698 57,433
Contract Services/Rentals 0 55,000 57,750 60,638 63,669 66,853 70,195
Office Rental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Misc. Revenue 0 6,000 6,300 6,615 6,946 7,293 7,658
Total Gross Income 0 106,000 111,300 116,865 122,708 128,844 135,286
EXPENSES:
Salary/Benefits 0 47,750 49,183 50,658 52,178 53,743 55,355
Supplies 0 24,200 24,684 25,178 25,681 26,195 26,719
Contracted Supplies 0 27,000 27,540 28,091 28,653 29,226 29,810
M & O 0 133,000 135,660 138,373 141,141 143,963 146,843
Minor Equipment 0 10,000 10,200 10,404 10,612 10,824 11,041
Property Taxes 0 120,000 122,400 124,848 127,345 129,892 132,490
Asset Management Fee 0 15,000 15,225 15,453 15,685 15,920 16,159
Liability Insurance 0 2,500 2,538 2,576 2,614 2,653 2,693
Annual Inspections 0 1,500 1,523 1,545 1,569 1,592 1,616
Total Expenses 0 380,950 388,952 397,126 405,477 414,009 422,726
Annual Additional Rent/Net Income 0 (274,950) (277,652) (280,261) (282,769) (285,165) (287,440)
Debt Service - $9.2M Bank Loan
Base Rent (Annual Debt Service @ 4%, Interest Only) (In Dev. Bud.) (368,809) (368,809) (368,809) (372,366) (368,809) (368,809)
Bank Loan Annual Base Rent + Additional Rent (643,759) (646,461) (649,070) (651,578) (653,975) (656,249) DI.A Page 16 of 31
Project Schedule
ID Task Name Duration Start Finish Predecessors
1 Pre-Construction Period 152 days Wed 2/6/13 Sun 7/7/13
2 Present Budget & Schedule to Committee 1 day Wed 2/6/13 Wed 2/6/13
3 Approval of Current Design & Budget 30 days Thu 2/7/13 Fri 3/8/13 2
4 Preconstruction Contracts Signed 30 days Sat 3/9/13 Sun 4/7/13 3
5 Spec Updates & Permit Revisions 60 days Mon 4/8/13 Thu 6/6/13 4
6 100% CD Set Issued 1 day Fri 6/7/13 Fri 6/7/13 5
7 Final Project Budget 30 days Sat 6/8/13 Sun 7/7/13 6
8 Financing Period 106 days Tue 4/16/13 Tue 7/30/13
9 New Markets Tax Credits Award to CDEs 30 days Tue 4/16/13 Wed 5/15/13
10 New Markets Tax Credits Commitment to Project 45 days Thu 5/16/13 Wed 7/17/13 9
11 Bank Loan Commitment 60 days Wed 5/1/13 Sat 6/29/13
12 Bank Loan Underwriting 30 days Sun 6/30/13 Mon 7/29/13 11
13 Close Bank Loan 1 day Tue 7/30/13 Tue 7/30/13 12
14 Construction Period 408 days Thu 7/18/13 Fri 8/29/14
15 Finalize Construction Contract 15 days Thu 7/18/13 Thu 8/1/13 10
16 Notice to Proceed 1 day Fri 8/2/13 Fri 8/2/13 15
17 Building Construction 11 mons Sat 8/3/13 Sat 6/28/14 16
18 Substantial Completion 1 day Sun 6/29/14 Sun 6/29/14 17
19 Contractor Close-out, FF&E, Operations Start-up 60 days Mon 6/30/14 Thu 8/28/14 18
20 Building Occupancy 1 day Fri 8/29/14 Fri 8/29/14 19
DI.A Page 17 of 31
Conclusions & Next Steps
•Lorig & NDC recommend proceeding with the current project as
designed to take advantage of this round of NMTC, and working
with the team to reduce construction cost & required
contingencies.
•Next 60 days:
•Committee and Council approval of the design and budget
•Finalize financing plan and loan amount required
•Contract with NDC
•NDC Contracts with Lorig, contractor and design team for pre-
construction services
•Maintaining the target schedule will be required to secure the
2013 NMTC allocation and we are prepared to work diligently.
DI.A Page 18 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
National Development Council & Lorig Associates 3/14/13
Memo
Date:
March 21, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
NDC/Lorig Memo Dated 03.14.13
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
See attached memorandum.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Les Gove Community Campus
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Wagner
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 19 of 31
1
MEMO
To: Michael Hursh, Advisor to the Mayor, City of Auburn
From: National Development Council & Lorig Associates LLC
Date: March 14, 2013
Re: Les Gove Community Center
Michael,
As a follow up to your email request last week, we thought it would be helpful to summarize what we
see as the best options for moving ahead with the Les Gove Community Center and taking advantage of
New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) financing. Because the project is nearly “shovel ready” it has an
advantage over competing projects for this cycle’s reduced and limited NMTC financing. We also think it
is risky to delay the project to next year as we think it will be an even more competitive financing
environment. Delaying the project further, beyond 2014, could risk the opportunity for NMTC
altogether. We believe there will be imense pressure to cut back on these type of tax expenditures as
the budget and fiscal negotiations go forward.
In order to have a realistic chance at NMTC financing for this year or next, one of the following options
needs to be selected by the City in the next 30-45 days:
Option 1: Proceed with Current Design and Budget (Best opportunity for 2013 NMTC)
• The current design reflects the City’s programming goal for the facility, with a 22,859gsf building
and a total project cost of $11.6 million.
• At this cost, the project can expect to receive $2.4 million in NMTC funding, and the remaining
$9.2 million could be financed through a bank loan or a loan from the City through a PDA.
• It may also be possible for the City to receive additional NMTC to recover a portion of the funds
spent to date by the City.
• The project team is committed and ready to start work immediately and constuction can start
this fall.
• While it is still possible to use the current design documents and studies to construct the project
this year, the documents and permits are reaching their maximum shelf life.
Option 2: Reduced Project Design (Best opportunity for 2014 NMTC)
• It may be possible to reduce the cost of the facility by reducing the scope, while preserving most
of the design and permit work (and costs) to date.
• The team would look for simple design revisions, such as removing the office “wing” of the
building, and reprogramming the remaining space.
• As the total project cost is reduced, the NMTC portion is reduced proportionately, so the City
can expect to save 79 cents for each dollar reduction in costs.
• The design team is ready to start work on this option, and will require a predevelopment
contract to cover costs and fees associated with the redesign.
DI.B Page 20 of 31
2
Option 3: New Project Design (Possible opportunity for 2014 NMTC)
• Under this option, the current design and permits would largely be discarded and the planning
and development process would start from the beginning.
• The new facility could be reprogrammed for a smaller footprint in an effort to reduce
construction costs, but new design and permitting costs similar to those spent-to-date will need
to be funded prior to receipt of the NMTC.
• Construction costs and interest rates are both expected to increase over the next two years.
• Design and permitting must be completed within the next 10-12 months for the project to be
eligible for the 2014 round of NMTC.
We hope this is helpful to the City in deciding how to proceed and take advantage of the 2013-2014
round of NMTC. Let us know if you have any questions.
Joe and John
DI.B Page 21 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Outline Committee Work Plan for the Next 12 Months
Date:
March 21, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Campus Map
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Wagner/Faber
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.C
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.C Page 22 of 31
Les Gove
Community
CAMPUS
& Surrounding
Neighborhood
City ofAuburn
March 2013
campusmap.ppt
3/21/13 11:40 am
Rich Wagner
Community
Center Site
Library
Big
Daddy’s Herr
Chevron
Museum
Sr.Center
Gym Parks
Grace
Community
Church
AYR
Les Gove
Communty
CAMPUS
Scale 700 feet
DI.C Page 23 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Operating and Maintenance Cost Minimization
Date:
March 21, 2013
Department:
Parks, Arts, and Recreation
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For discussion only.
Background Summary:
Note: Any materials for this item will be provided at the meeting.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Les Gove Community Campus
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Faber
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 24 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Director's Report
Date:
March 20, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 25 of 31
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
LGCC Matrix
Date:
March 20, 2013
Department:
Planning and Development
Attachments:
Committee Matrix
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
For information only. See attached matrix.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Wagner Staff:Tate
Meeting Date:March 27, 2013 Item Number:DI.F
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.F Page 26 of 31
LE
S
G
O
V
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
A
M
P
U
S
C
O
M
M
I
T
E
E
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
T
R
I
X
NO
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
T
A
F
F
L
E
A
D
PR
E
V
.
RE
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
NE
X
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
ES
T
.
CO
M
P
L
.
DA
T
E
STATUS
1 1a
An
a
l
y
z
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
R
e
n
t
a
l
C
o
o
r
d
i
n
a
t
o
r
fo
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
m
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
Fa
b
e
r
1
1
/
7
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
Co
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ex
i
s
t
i
n
g
r
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
1b
Di
s
c
u
s
s
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
c
h
a
r
g
e
t
o
P
a
r
k
s
De
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
u
s
e
o
f
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
Ce
n
t
e
r
Fa
b
e
r
1
1
/
7
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
TB
D
pe
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
1c
De
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
c
o
s
t
m
o
d
e
l
f
o
r
se
r
v
i
c
e
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
Fa
b
e
r
/
C
o
l
e
m
a
n
1
1
/
7
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
TB
D
pe
n
d
i
n
g
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
1d
Es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
2
-
y
e
a
r
m
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
r
e
d
u
c
e
d
co
s
t
s
f
o
r
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
a
g
e
n
c
i
e
s
Fa
b
e
r
1
1
/
7
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
TB
D
Concurrent with Construction
1e
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
n
e
w
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
a
n
d
Fa
b
e
r
12
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
2/
6
/
2
0
1
2
On
g
o
i
n
g
Summer Report
Le
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
-
O
p
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
1e
Id
e
n
t
i
f
y
n
e
w
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
i
n
g
a
n
d
re
v
e
n
u
e
s
f
o
r
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
Fa
b
e
r
1
2
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
2
On
g
o
i
n
g
Summer Report
2 2a
En
g
a
g
e
a
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
e
r
t
o
R
e
v
i
e
w
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
P
l
a
n
s
Hu
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
2b
C
o
s
t
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
H
u
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
2c
En
g
a
g
e
C
o
n
t
r
a
c
t
o
r
(
s
)
t
o
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
N
o
-
Co
s
t
D
e
t
a
i
l
e
d
C
o
s
t
E
s
t
i
m
a
t
e
Hu
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
Le
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
e
n
t
e
r
-
N
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
DI.F Page 27 of 31
LE
S
G
O
V
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
A
M
P
U
S
C
O
M
M
I
T
E
E
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
T
R
I
X
NO
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
T
A
F
F
L
E
A
D
PR
E
V
.
RE
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
NE
X
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
ES
T
.
CO
M
P
L
.
DA
T
E
STATUS
2d
En
g
a
g
e
m
e
n
t
o
f
B
L
R
B
A
r
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
s
t
o
Pa
r
t
i
c
i
p
a
t
e
i
n
N
o
-
C
o
s
t
C
o
s
t
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
An
a
l
y
s
i
s
/
C
o
s
t
S
a
v
i
n
g
s
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
Hu
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
2e
An
a
l
y
z
e
p
o
s
s
i
b
l
e
u
s
e
o
f
b
a
n
k
q
u
a
l
i
f
i
e
d
bo
n
d
s
(
e
.
g
.
6
3
-
2
0
b
o
n
d
s
)
Hu
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
2f
Mo
n
i
t
o
r
C
o
n
g
r
e
s
s
i
o
n
a
l
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
i
o
n
of
N
e
w
M
a
r
k
e
t
T
a
x
C
r
e
d
i
t
s
Hu
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
2g
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
C
i
t
y
r
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
c
o
s
t
s
H
u
r
s
h
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
1
/
1
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
T
B
D
To
b
e
r
e
p
o
r
t
e
d
o
n
b
y
Na
t
i
o
n
a
l
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Co
u
n
c
i
l
a
t
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
b
r
i
e
f
i
n
g
3 3a
Co
u
n
c
i
l
f
u
n
d
r
a
i
s
i
n
g
p
l
a
n
t
o
b
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
a
n
d
i
m
p
l
e
m
e
n
t
e
d
Fa
b
e
r
1
2
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
T
B
D
T
B
D
Ac
t
i
o
n
p
l
a
n
f
o
r
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
l
e
d
fu
n
d
r
a
i
s
i
n
g
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
b
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
e
d
w
i
t
h
s
t
a
f
f
i
n
p
u
t
4 4a
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
S
t
a
f
f
K
i
c
k
-
O
f
f
a
n
d
Br
a
i
n
s
t
o
r
m
i
n
g
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
1
1
/
2
0
1
2
N
/
A
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
N
/
A
4b
Br
a
i
n
s
t
o
r
m
i
n
g
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
w
i
t
h
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
Co
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
2
N
/
A
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
N
/
A
Le
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
-
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
P
a
r
k
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Le
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
-
P
u
b
l
i
c
A
r
t
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
DI.F Page 28 of 31
LE
S
G
O
V
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
A
M
P
U
S
C
O
M
M
I
T
E
E
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
T
R
I
X
4c
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
o
f
t
h
e
W
h
o
l
e
p
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
an
d
d
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
1
0
/
2
9
/
2
0
1
2
N
/
A
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
N
/
A
NO
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
T
A
F
F
L
E
A
D
PR
E
V
.
RE
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
NE
X
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
ES
T
.
CO
M
P
L
.
DA
T
E
STATUS
4d
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
s
S
u
r
v
e
y
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
F
e
b
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4e
P
a
r
k
U
s
e
r
s
S
u
r
v
e
y
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
F
e
b
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
4f
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
N
o
.
1
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
M
a
r
.
2
0
1
3
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4g
P
r
e
p
a
r
a
t
i
o
n
o
f
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
Ma
r
.
-
A
p
r
.
20
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4h
Re
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
L
e
s
Go
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
2
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
M
a
y
-
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4i
Re
v
i
e
w
o
f
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
w
i
t
h
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
&
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
D
e
v
.
Co
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
J
u
n
-
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
DI.F Page 29 of 31
LE
S
G
O
V
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
A
M
P
U
S
C
O
M
M
I
T
E
E
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
T
R
I
X
4j
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
pe
r
L
G
C
C
a
n
d
P
C
D
C
f
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
J
u
l
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
NO
.
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
S
T
A
F
F
L
E
A
D
PR
E
V
.
RE
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
NE
X
T
R
E
V
I
E
W
DA
T
E
ES
T
.
CO
M
P
L
.
DA
T
E
STATUS
4k
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
N
o
.
2
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
J
u
l
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4l
LG
C
C
&
P
C
D
C
D
i
s
c
u
s
s
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
Re
v
i
e
w
s
o
f
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
J
u
l
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
Re
v
i
e
w
s
o
f
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
fe
e
d
b
a
c
k
o
n
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4m
St
a
f
f
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
t
o
D
r
a
f
t
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
pe
r
L
G
C
C
,
P
C
D
C
a
n
d
ne
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
f
e
e
d
b
a
c
k
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
A
u
g
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4n
St
a
f
f
P
r
e
s
e
n
t
a
t
i
o
n
o
n
Re
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
e
d
F
i
n
a
l
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
t
o
LG
C
C
a
n
d
P
C
D
C
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
S
e
p
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4o
N
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
M
e
e
t
i
n
g
N
o
.
3
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
O
c
t
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
DI.F Page 30 of 31
LE
S
G
O
V
E
C
O
M
M
U
N
I
T
Y
C
A
M
P
U
S
C
O
M
M
I
T
E
E
-
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
M
A
T
R
I
X
4p
LG
C
C
A
c
t
i
o
n
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
C
i
t
y
Co
u
n
c
i
l
o
n
F
i
n
a
l
A
c
t
i
o
n
P
l
a
n
Fa
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
O
c
t
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013
4q
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
R
e
s
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
A
d
o
p
t
i
o
n
F
a
b
e
r
/
S
n
y
d
e
r
9
/
2
6
/
2
0
1
3
2
/
6
/
2
0
1
3
N
o
v
.
2
0
1
3
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
d
e
l
a
y
e
d
d
u
e
t
o
ot
h
e
r
C
i
t
y
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
;
sc
h
e
d
u
l
e
&
w
o
r
k
e
f
f
o
r
t
s
t
o
be
r
e
v
i
s
e
d
f
o
r
c
o
m
p
l
e
t
i
o
n
later in 2013 Subject Monitor
Re
v
i
s
i
o
n
D
a
t
e
:
F
e
b
r
u
a
r
y
2
0
1
3
Action
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
C:
\
P
r
o
g
r
a
m
F
i
l
e
s
\
n
e
e
v
i
a
.
c
o
m
\
d
o
c
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
r
P
r
o
\
t
e
m
p
\
N
V
D
C
\
3
2
B
4
7
D
E
7
-
F
A
A
7
-
4
6
E
3
-
9
B
F
C
-
1
5
6
D
D
4
9
5
9
D
7
8
\
P
D
F
C
o
n
v
e
r
t
.
6
0
4
1
.
1
.
M
a
t
r
i
x
_
L
e
s
G
o
v
e
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
C
a
m
p
u
s
C
o
m
m
i
t
t
e
e
.
x
l
s
DI.F Page 31 of 31