The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07-02-2013 7-2-2013 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA The City of Auburn Planning Commission is an eight member advisory body that provides recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the preparation of and amendments to land use plans and related codes such as zoning. Planning Commissioners are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Actions taken by the Planning Commission are not final decisions; they are in the form of recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING July 2 , 2013 AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER – 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers II. ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. May 7, 2013 B. June 18, 2013 Special Workshop and Special Meeting Minutes IV. PUBLIC COMMENT Comment from the audience on any item not listed on the agenda for discussion or public hearing. V. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Update on Planning and Development Department activities. VI. OTHER BUSINESS A. Critical Areas Code Amendment* (Dixon) Summary: Amendment to Critical Area Regulations (ACC 16.10) related to the location of mitigation sites outside the City. B. 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments* (Dixon) Summary: Review the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment docket that includes city initiated and private initiated amendments. VII. ADJOURNMENT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION May 7 , 2013 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Judi Roland called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located on the first floor of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA. II. ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM Planning Commission Members present were: Chair Judi Roland, Vice-Chair Copple, Commissioner Couture, Commissioner Mason, Commissioner Baggett, Commissioner Trout and Commissioner Smith. Commissioner Ramey was not present. The Planning Secretary received an email upon returning from the meeting sent by Commissioner Ramey at 6:51 p.m. Staff present included: Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate, Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, and Planning and Development Secretary Tina Kriss. Member of the audience present included: Citizen Scot Pondelick. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. April 2, 2013 Commissioner Copple moved and Commissioner Baggett seconded to approve the minutes from the April 2, 2013 meeting as written. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 7-0 IV. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no public comments on any item not listed on the agenda for discussion or public hearing. V. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Planning Manager Chamberlain reported that the Landmark Development Group has a Pre-Application meeting scheduled; they expect to submit their design review within two weeks and by the end of June have their building permit application submitted. Resolution No. 4947, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to negotiate and execute a purchase and sale agreement between the City of Auburn and Teutsch Partners, LLC was presented at the May 6, 2013 City Council meeting. The resolution was passed by Council and authorizes a negotiation and execution of the Purchase and Sale Agreement for the purchase of either or both the SW Block and or the SE Block of the City owned blocks downtown for the purposes of vertical construction and development. Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate stated by the end of this week the Orion Industries building permit should be approved. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 7, 2013 Page 2 Last year the City experienced the biggest development year since 2000. This year 158 Single-Family Residential permits were issued with an approximate construction value of $35,000,000.00 (as compared to 83 last year with an approximate construction value of $19,000,000.00). This year 100 Commercial permits have been issued with an approximate construction value of $83,500,000.00 (as compared to 80 last year with an approximate construction value of $12,000,000.00). There are currently a lot of projects in the review process and a few more expected to be submitted, this will be a big year for development. Ordinance No. 6461, Electric Fence Code update, was adopted by the City Council at the May 6, 2013 City Council meeting as recommended by the Planning Commission. At the February 5, 2013 Special Joint Meeting between the Planning and Community Development Committee and the Planning Commission staff explained The Washington State Building Code Council (the reviewing and adopting agency for the Washington State Codes) will go through a process to adopt the 2012 Building Code updates. City staff received the State amendments on May 6, 2013 and is currently reviewing the proposed changes. Staff would like to meet for a work session with the Commission on June 4, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. before the Public Hearing at 7:00 p.m. to review the proposed updates. Staff will provide a memo to review the substantive changes from the 2009 to 2012 Building Code. VI. PUBLIC HEARING There were no public hearing items. VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Student/Rental Housing – Amending the Definition of Family in the Auburn City Code (Chamberlain/Tate) Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain briefed the Commission on the proposed code amendment to amend the definition of family in Title 18. Additionally, background information was provided on Student/Rental Housing and the City’s regulations currently in place. Over the last several months, residents who live in the single family residential communities near Green River Community College (GRCC) are observing a spike in rental homes in their neighborhood that are occupied by students of GRCC. They have expressed several concerns: • Parking Impacts • Unpermitted conversion of garages to living space • Overcrowding of single family homes with too many occupants • Lack of property solid waste management • Noise impacts • Lack of proper oversight by GRCC Planning Manager Chamberlain reported that City staff has met with Green River Community College (GRCC) to review their housing programs; staff reviewed these programs with the Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 7, 2013 Page 3 Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate explained that the current definition of “Family” means a person living alone, two or more persons related by blood or marriage, or a group of eight or fewer residents who are not related by blood or marriage customarily living together as a single housekeeping unit and using common cooking facilities. “Boardinghouse” means any dwelling in which three or more persons, either individually or as families, are housed or lodged for hire with or without meals. Changing the definition of “family” in the zoning code is an interim solution as staff works on the longer Phase 2 steps to address more detailed code amendments and input by Green River Community College on the proposed code amendments and community outreach. The current definition is in conflict with the definition of “Boardinghouse”. The City is concerned about Health, Life and Safety issues for students and rental housing. The local and international student population has grown and will continue to increase, the City would like to review policy and plan ahead for a trend that is expanding and increasing the need for student housing. The Planning Commission agreed they will review the new definition of “family” at the June 4, 2013 work session in preparation for a public hearing that evening. In discussing Phase 2 work with staff, the Planning Commission provided the following input: • Check with GRCC to see if, in addition to the three housing options, there are other housing recommendations made by the college through student services under the oversight of the college. • Review the definition of “family” used within the City Code to understand if the term is necessary and used appropriately. • Research the number of local students that utilize housing around GRCC. • Discuss incorporating a “hardship clause” to proposed code updates for those individuals living with family members on a temporary basis. • Discuss how the Owner/Landlord/Tenant can provide oversight (implementation of any regulation could be implemented through a signed document linked to the business license). B. Major Comprehensive Plan Update (Chamberlain/Tate) Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate reported the City of Auburn is required, under the Washington State Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), to develop and implement a Comprehensive Plan that is comprised of several mandatory elements. Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), the City of Auburn is required to update its Comprehensive Plan by June 30, 2015. A Strategic Plan identifies broad commitments to the enhancing and maintaining of community goals. This plan will serve as the road map to achieving those commitments and will be (1) action oriented, (2) specifically targeted, (3) appropriately sequenced, and (4) measurable over time. The Strategic Plan and the Comprehensive Plan are two different documents. The Comprehensive Plan will run its course through the Planning Commission process, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES May 7, 2013 Page 4 with involvement in every area of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes the existing plan can use an overhaul to streamline the plan and make it more user friendly for citizens, policy makers, and implementers. Staff would like to create a shorter, more nimble document that is much more usable. As part of the process staff would like to conduct some visioning exercises through community wide dialogue as to the direction in which the City should be steered over the next several decades. Staff reviewed the strategy schedule with the Planning Commission. As part of the brainstorming process, staff asked the Commission for ideas or input on thoughts and ideas to consider as staff moves forward to develop the structure and outline that will be used to successfully implement these endeavors. The Commission provided the following ideas and thoughts: • Meet with Planning and Community Development Committee to discuss strategy planning. • When renewing a City business license they get a questionnaire for thoughts and ideas about long-term planning and visioning. • If there is a City event, the Mayor or a City official could be present at a booth to provide and obtain information or a conduct a questionnaire from the public for future planning. • Put together a City staff team from every level of the City to obtain feedback and input of the plan. • Form committees from various areas of the City to gain insight from the public. The next meeting will be held Tuesday, June 4, 2013. A workshop will beg in at 6:30 p.m. for the proposed code updates for the definition of “family” and to discuss the 2012 Building Code updates. The public hearing on these two items will begin at 7:00 p.m. on June 4, 2013 after the work session. VIII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair Roland adjourned the meeting at 8:36 p.m. The City of Auburn Planning Commission is an eight member advisory body that provides recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the preparation of and amendments to land use plans and related codes such as zoning. Planning Commissioners are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Actions taken by the Planning Commission are not final decisions; they are in the form of recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL WORK SESSION AND SPECIAL MEETING June 18, 2013 MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER – Special Work Session 6:30 p.m., Council Chambers Chair Judi Roland called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers located on the first floor of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA. II. ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM Planning Commission Members present were: Chair Judi Roland, Vice-Chair Ron Copple, Commissioner Joan Mason, Commissioner Dale Couture, Commissioner Yolanda Trout and Commissioner Jack Smith. Commissioner Bob Baggett was excused and Commissioner Mark Ramey was unexcused. Staff present included: City Attorny Dan Heid, Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate, Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Building Official Tom Ushing, Administrateve and Business Services Manager Darcie Hanson. Members of the audience included: Carl Yuhasz, Ken Allgeier, Kenneth Pflugradt, Julia A. Short, Russ Campbell, Jean Lix, Hank Galmish, Autsin Cole and Marjory Dodel. III. Amendments to Title 15 of the Auburn City Code (The building Code) – Work Session Interim Planning Director Jeff Tate went through the proposed changes to the Building code. Commissioner Couture asked about the energy code and if it should be mentioned in the code. Building Official Tom Ushing stated he could insert it. Commissioner Jack smith asked about current code enforcement policies. Interim Director Tate explained that ACC 1.25 addresses the ability to enforce city codes. There were no further questions. IV. Adjournment There being no further discussion for the work session on amendments to Title 15 of Auburn City Code, Case No. ZOA13-0002, Chair Roland adjourned the work session at 7:00 p.m, and stated there would be a short break. I. CALL TO ORDER – Special Meeting, 7:00 p.m., Council Chambers Chair Judi Roland called the public hearing to order at 7:16 p.m. in the Council Chambers located on the first floor of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA. II. ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM Planning Commission Members present were: Chair Judi Roland, Vice-Chair Ron Copple, Commissioner Joan Mason, Commissioner Dale Couture, Commissioner Yolanda The City of Auburn Planning Commission is an eight member advisory body that provides recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the preparation of and amendments to land use plans and related codes such as zoning. Planning Commissioners are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Actions taken by the Planning Commission are not final decisions; they are in the form of recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. Trout and Commissioner Jack Smith. Commissioner Bob Baggett was excused and Commissioner Mark Ramey was unexcused. Staff present included: City Attorny Dan Heid, Planning and Development Interim Director Jeff Tate, Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Building Official Tom Ushing, Administrateve and Business Services Manager Darcie Hanson. Members of the audience included: Carl Yuhasz, Ken Allgeier, Kenneth Pflugradt, Julia A. Short, Russ Campbell, Jean Lix, Hank Galmish, Autsin Cole and Marjory Dodel. III. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment on items not on this agenda. IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT Interim Director Tate announced the hire of a new Planning and Development Director who will begin employment on August 5th. Nancy Welch will join us from Wisconsin. V. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Amendments to title 15 of the Auburn City Code (The Building Code) – Case No. ZOA13-0002 There was no public testimony on the Amendments to the Auburn City Code Title 15 changes. Commissioner Copple asked is the charts in the agenda packet would be included in the code or if they were for information purposes only. Interim Director Tate replied that they were for information only in this agenda packet. Commissioner Copple moved to recommend approval, Commissioner Trout seconded the motion. Motion carried unanimously 5-0. B. Amendment to Auburn City Code – Case No. ZOA13 -0003 Planning Manager Chamberlain explained the staff report and briefed those in attendance on the history of why the code amendment is being brought forward. She also explained why the current definition of family is in conflict with other areas of city code. She also defined Boarding House and handed out a definition. She went through the staff report and highlighted the items that need to be on the record. She also entered into the exhibits a copy of an email from citizen Robert Dewitt who had comments but was unable to attend the public hearing. Chair Roland asked for a few minutes for the Commissioners to read the material handed out. Chair Roland then opened the public hearing on case ZOA13-0003 at 7:32 p.m. Russ Campbell, 31606 126th AVE SE, Auburn, WA. 98092 spoke about the fact that he and his neighbors welcome this definition change but that the City of Auburn does not lose site of the fact that there are houses being sold and used for student housing as well as all of the previous ones that are causing issues. The City of Auburn Planning Commission is an eight member advisory body that provides recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the preparation of and amendments to land use plans and related codes such as zoning. Planning Commissioners are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Actions taken by the Planning Commission are not final decisions; they are in the form of recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. Hank Galmish, 12443 SE 318th ST, Auburn, WA. 98092 who lives in the Rainier Ridge subdivision expressed thanks for the proposed definition changes and expressed concern about the general upkeep of most of the houses being rented out in the area. He is concerned about affects on property values, health and quality of life. They have issues with garbage and vermin due to unkept houses. Kenneth Pflugradt, 12725 SE 312th ST #H201, Auburn, WA. 98092 spoke that at Gentry Walk Apartments they have issues with foreign students renting units and then the management does not enforce the number of occupants allowed in the unit. This creates issues such as garbage overflowing, rats and tenants cooking in bathrooms. There being no further requests to speak Chair Roland closed the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. Commissioner Smith asked how long has the current definition been in place? Planning Manager Chamberlain stated she would have to research the answer. He wanted to change the definition of boarding house as well. Chair Roland reminded him that the proposal on the table for discussion was to change the definition of family only. Commissioner Mason asked about the timing of the change and when it would be effective. Planning Manager Chamberlain explained it would be mid July before it would be through the Council Committees and to full Council for review. There was brief discussion on why we are proposing this change now rather than waiting until we can look at the whole student housing issue. Planning Manager Chamberlain and Attorney Heid explained that it is due to the conflict that current code creates. Commissioner Couture motioned to forward these changes for approval. Commissioner Smith seconded. Motion carried 3-2 with Commissioners Trout and Mason voting no. VI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair Roland adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m. Page 1 of 3 Memorandum To: Planning Commissioners From: Jeff Dixon, Principal Planner CC: Major Lewis Jeff Tate, Interim Planning and Development Director Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager Date: June 26, 2013 Re: Discussion Topic: Code Amendment to City’s Critical Area Regulations (ACC 16.10) related to the location of mitigation sites outside the City BACKGROUND The City adopted its critical area regulations in 2005 by Ordinance # 5894. The adoption was a culmination of a series of extensive workshops and hearings over more than a 6- month period with the Planning Commission and City Council. The regulations have been in effect now for 8 years, and have generally been working well and proven effective. One subject area that has been evolving since the time of adoption of these regulations however, is the way in which mitigation is accomplished, especially mitigation related to wetlands. The City’s regulations generally provide for “mitigation sequencing”; as described in the following definition. Mitigation is defined in the Auburn City Code (ACC) as: “ACC 16.10.020 Definitions. "Mitigation" means activities which include: 1. Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of actions. 2. Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. 3. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. Page 2 of 3 3. Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the affected environment. 4. Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action. 5. Compensating for the impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments. While monitoring without additional actions is not considered mitigation for the purposes of these regulations, it shall be part of a comprehensive mitigation program.” Where mitigation or compensating for the impact is appropriate, there is generally a movement and desire in the environmental community to move to an eco-region approach to addressing the impact and mitigation. In the case of wetlands, this is generally based on a watershed area or drainage basin—replacing the resource within the same contributory surface water area of a river or lake as the impact. This watershed basis to evaluating the location of impacts and the location of the mitigation sites takes into account the natural environment of the resource and the fact that environmental resources do not always neatly fit into or observe corporate or political boundaries. ISSUE Auburn City Code Section 16.10.110 establishes the standards, criteria, and plan requirements for development activities that necessitate the mitigation of impacts to critical areas. While this section applies to all types of critical areas, it is most commonly implemented in relation to wetlands. This is because other types of critical areas tend to be more geographically dependant. ACC 16.10.110.B states that “Mitigation Sites shall be located in the City.” Planning and Development Department staff recommends that this language be re-evaluated so that the location of mitigation sites can be more flexible and can be located outside of the City. This would allow staff to consider allowing the mitigation site to be located outside the City when reviewing development proposals that impact critical areas. While the City’s critical area regulations promote avoidance of impacts to critical areas and on-site mitigation as preferred approaches, where these are not viable, mitigation within the same watershed is a commonly accepted approach. Different portions of the City are located within the watershed of the Green and White Rivers, each of which extend substantially beyond the city limits which means there is potential for pursing mitigation opportunities outside the city. The change would also increase consistency with the approach utilized by other agencies that have jurisdiction for wetland impacts. Page 3 of 3 Action City of Auburn Planning and Development staff to prepare an amendment to Section ACC 16.10.110 to modify the language to allow mitigation to occur outside the City when the City can ensure that subsequent mitigation and monitoring required under other sections of the Critical Area regulations are being met (See Attachment A). The City will proceed to complete the necessary steps for this process and then schedule the code amendment for a future hearing by the Planning Commission. Enclosure: Attachment A, Excerpt of Auburn City Code 16.10.110. to show potential code revision. Excerpt from Critical Area Regulations Chapter 16.10 16.10.110 Mitigation standards, criteria and plan requirements. A. Mitigation Standards. Adverse impacts to critical area functions and values shall be mitigated. Mitigation actions shall generally be implemented in the preferred sequence identified in this chapter. Proposals which include less preferred and/or compensatory mitigation shall demonstrate that: 1. All feasible and reasonable measures as determined by the department have been taken to reduce impacts and losses to the critical area, or to avoid impacts where avoidance is required by these regulations; 2. The restored, created or enhanced critical area or buffer will be as viable and enduring as the critical area or buffer area it replaces; and 3. No overall net loss will occur in wetland or stream functions and values. The mitigation shall be functionally equivalent to or greater than the altered wetland or stream in terms of hydrological, biological, physical, and chemical functions. B. Location and Timing of Mitigation. 1. The preferred location of mitigation is on-site. Mitigation may be allowed off-site only when it is determined by the department that on-site mitigation is not scientifically feasible or practical due to physical features of the property, or, in the case of wetlands, where the affected site is identified as appropriate for off-site mitigation in the Mill Creek Special Area Management Plan (SAMP), April 2000. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to demonstrate that mitigation cannot be provided on-site or is consistent with the SAMP. When mitigation cannot be provided on-site, mitigation shall be provided in the same drainage basin as the permitted activity on property owned, secured, or controlled by the applicant where such mitigation is practical and beneficial to the critical area and associated resources. Mitigation sites shall be located within the city. Where mitigation is authorized to be located outside the City limits, the Applicant shall assure to the satisfaction of the Department that other requirements of this Chapter will be met, including but not limited to, monitoring and maintenance. 2. In-kind mitigation shall be provided except when the applicant demonstrates, and the department concurs, that greater functional and habitat value can be achieved through out-of-kind mitigation. 3. When wetland, stream or habitat mitigation is permitted by these regulations, the mitigation project shall occur near an adequate water supply (river, stream, ground water) with a hydrologic connection to the critical area to ensure a successful mitigation or restoration. A natural hydrologic connection is preferential as compared to one which relies upon manmade or constructed features requiring routine maintenance. 4. Any mitigation plan shall be completed before initiation of other permitted activities, unless a phased or concurrent schedule that assures completion prior to occupancy has been approved by the department. Page 1 of 1 Memorandum To: Planning Commissioners From: Jeff Dixon, Principal Planner CC: Mayor Lewis Jeff Tate, Interim Planning and Development Director Elizabeth Chamberlain, AICP, Planning Manager Date: June 26, 2013 Re: Discussion Topic: Docket of 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments BACKGROUND Annually the City amends its Comprehensive Plan. The City processes city – initiated amendments in response to items that are “docketed” (text or map). The city also includes private – initiated amendments. Private initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment applications (text or map) were accepted by the City of Auburn until Friday, June 7, 2013. In response to the public notification of the time period for applications, the City received two private – initiated comprehensive plan amendments; both are map amendments; no private text amendments were submitted. The docket was reviewed by the City Council’s Planning and Community Development Committee at their June 24, 2013 meeting. DISCUSSION At the July 2, 2013 Planning Commission meeting staff would like to explain, review, and discuss the docket of items as part of this year’s amendments. Enclosures: Attachment A - Docket of Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments Attachment B – Draft proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Schedule. 6/27/2013 1 Item Page(s)Area to be changed Change Reason Pros Cons Comments P/T # 1 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan Chapter 5, Capital Facilities (Incorporated by reference) N/A Incorporate updated information Reflect new projects and remove projects that have been completed as well as updated information related to development activity and projection of None P/T # 2 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan Chapter 5, Capital Facilities (Incorporated by reference) N/A Incorporate updated information Reflect new projects and remove projects that have been completed as well as updated information related to development activity and projection of None P/T # 3 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Chapter 5, Capital Facilities (Incorporated by reference) N/A Incorporate updated information Reflect new projects and remove projects that have been completed as well as updated information related to development and projection of student None P/T # 4 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan Chapter 5, Capital Facilities (Incorporated by reference) N/A Incorporate updated information Reflect new projects and remove projects that have been completed as well as updated information related to development activity and projection of None P/T # 5 COA Capital Facilities Plan Chapter 5, Capital Facilities (Incorporated by reference)Miscellaneous amendments Incorporate updated information Add new projects to the CFP and remove projects that have been completed. Remain current. None Finance Dept originates with assistance for all other city Depts. CITY-INITIATED TEXT AMENDMENTS 2013 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT DOCKET 6/27/2013 2 Item Page Area to be changed Change Reason Pros Cons Comments CPA13- 0001 Map Section Map 14.1, Comprehensive Plan Map Request by Wesley Homes Lea Hill , LLC to change the designation of existing site and two recently acquired adajcent parcels located south of SE 320th ST, between 108th and 110th AVE SE for a Comp. Plan and Rezone of approximately 18.65 acres. (18.08 acres extg, & 0.5 acres The Applicant seeks to change designations of their contiguous parcels from 'Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi-Public" to facilitate subsequent rezoning of the three parcels to I, Institutional" to accommodate future expansion of existing elder care facility. To be determined To be determined CPA13- 0002 Map Section Map 14.1, Comprehensive Plan Map Request by two adjacent property owners located at the NW corner of 37th ST NW and W Valley HWY for a Comp. Plan and Rezone of approximately 2.10 acres for future potential development. Applicants seek to change designations of their contiguous parcels from 'Heavy Commercial ' to 'Light Industrial' to eliminate split designations of each parcel and to accommodate future development. To be determined To be determined PRIVATELY- INITIATED MAP AMENDMENTS City of Auburn 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Schedule DRAFT Page 1 of 1 6/27/2013 6-7-13 6-24-13 7-2-13 or 7-16-13 8-6-13 9-4-13 10-8-13 10-14-13 11-5-13 11-12-13 11-18-13 11-25-13 12-2-13 12-2-13 Staff PCDC PC PC PC PC PCDC PC PCDC PWC PCDC PWC CC Group 1 • City initiated text amendments • Private initiated map amendm ents Private initiated amendments applications due Final Direction on Docket Study Session Discuss if needed Public Hearing Public Hearing continued if needed Discuss if needed Discuss/Recommendation if needed PCDC Discussion Discussion PCDC Recommendation to Council Discussion if needed Council Action Group 2 • Capital Facilities Plan Private initiated amendments applications due Final Direction on Docket N/A Study Session N/A Public Hearing Discuss if needed Discuss/Recommendation if needed PCDC Discussion Discussion PCDC Recommendation to Council Discussion if needed Council Action