HomeMy WebLinkAbout06 10-23-2013 Comp Plan Policy & Text Amendment #1 _
POLICY & TEXT AMENDMENT (PT #1)
INCORPORATE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2013- 2019
i
Auburn School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES
PLAN
2013 through 2019
,"- ..t���•, � "t.�
� � ��
;
�
, o .�-
_ r � � �
�
i e (i � : �
... �t �� a� -
�
� ,� -� ,, � �.
_ � _ � - — � - - _- -:�..::.- i `t.
_ __-,:.�� __ � � _ 1
� �
- ��
- r-
° � i
�:, ""'', r t:�.
i Y�•'_ y.
° �"P _
2."✓ �
.h � • e '
� �
^ � ' +
„,,.,, �x. _ �_ .'�» /__.�:";
.w. ..,�¢. .a�/� .``•- �:,� �. i
-��� �- .:.'�" ' �
-�-�
� - � � l��.i.il,i� 'a�
Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors
May 28, 2013
a� � � RN ; ;
SCNOOL DISTRICT �
ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER
915 Fourth Street NE
Aubum, Washington 98002
(253) 931-4900
Serving Students in:
Unincorporated King County
City of Aubum
City of Algona
City of Kent
City of Pacific
City of Black Diamond
BOARD of DIRECTORS �
Janice Nelson
Ray Vefik
Lisa Connors
Carol Seng
Anne Baunach
Dr. Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent
I
�, Table of Contents
Section I Executive Summary ....................... Page 1
Section II Enrollment Projections.....................Page 6
Section III � Standard of Service..........,............. Page 8
5ection IV Inventory of Facilities.......................Page 15
`, Section V Pupil Capacity................................Page 19
Section VI Capital Construction Plan................. Page 22
Section VII Impact Fees.................................. Page 26
Section VIII Appendices................................... Page 30
Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 31
Appendix A.2-Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45
Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey Page 50
[ i
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section I
Executive Summary
I
� i Aubum School District No. 408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
I. Executive Summary
This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Flan") has been prepared by the Aubum
School District(the"District°) as the Distrid's prinoipal planning document, in compliance
with the requirements of Washington's Grovirth Management Act and the adopted
ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared
using data available in the spring of 2013.
This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capRal facilities plans adopted by the District.
However, this Plan is not intended to be.the sole plan for all of the DistricYs needs. The
District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistenY
with Board Policies and actions,taking into account a longer or a shorter time period;
other factors and trends in the use of faciliGes; and other needs of the District as may be
required. However, anysuch plan or plans wilf be consistent with this Six-YearCapital
Faciiities Plan.
?o enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and
wkhin the City of Auburn and City of Kent;lhe King County Council, the City of Auburn
and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's
� respective comprehensive plan. To enable 4he collection of impact fees in the Cities of
Algona, Pac�c and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and
adopt school impact fee ordinances.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances,
the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s)
adjusted accordingly.
The Plan establishes 4he DistricYs"standard of service" in order to ascertain the District's
current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Putilic Instruction
establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for
the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the schooi
impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based.on 4he
DistricYs specific needs. In general, the DistricPs currerrt standard provides.thaYclass
size for grade.s K-2 shouid not exceed 25 students; class size for grades 3-4 should not
exceed 27 students; ciass size forgYade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When
averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 26.5 students per classroom.
Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas
restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section I(I for more specific information.)
The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service
and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The DistricPs
2012-13 capacity was 13,506. The actual number of individual students was 14,596 as
of Octoberl, 2012. (See Section V for more specific information.)
�
2
The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and �\ ;
proposed modemization to the DistricYs existing facilRies. This provided for a new high
school, Auburn Mountainview, approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in
September 2005; and the addition of two new elementary schools approved 6y the
voters in February 2005; with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and
Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007. The plan includ_es the
construction of a new middle school and a new elementaryschool, as well.asthe
acquisition of a future school site to accommodate growth. The new facilities are
required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the
large development areas within the Aubum School DisVict Three areas that have
sign�cant impact on the school disVict are the Lakeland South, 4he Lea Hill,and the
north Autiurn valley areas of the disVict. There are other pockets of development.th"at
impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that
was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downtum has slowed development in
these areas, but recent new construction is beginning to pick back up.
The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October
2008 a Steering Committee made recommendationsto the Board for capital
improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten
years. These recommentlations led to a capital improvements levy and abond issue that
was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both balloYmeasures were not successful in
March. The board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November
2009, which the voters approved. In the Fall of 2011 the school board determined to
move forward with the Au6urn High School Modernization and ReconsVuction Project
and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was
supported;by the community at nearly 57% apqroval rate, but was short of the super �
majority requiremenbof 60%. In March of 2012 the school board determined to rerun the �
bond again in November of 2012. In November 2012 the bond passed at 62% and
construction for the Auburn High School Modemization and Reoonstruction Project
began on February 25, 2013.
The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Aubum and the
City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the
fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development, Section VII
sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and mufti-family dwelling
units. The student generation factors have been developed using 4he students who
actually attend school in the Aubum School District from single fainily and muRi-family
developments constructed in the last five years. This Plan uses the student generation
factors for multi-family in 2012. Due to the dramatic changes in the numbers for2013,
the District,plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next year to determine rf tHis
is a trend or an anomaiy. The method of collecting 4he data is Hrith the use of GIS
mapping soflware, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the
mapping with studerit data fromthe DistricYs student data system. This method gives
the District actual student generation numbers for each gradespan for ident�ed
developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3.
3
.Aubum School Districl No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
� EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Listed below is a summary Ievel outline of the changes from the 2012 Capital
Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2013 Plan. The changes are noted by Section
forease ofreference.
Section I
Executive Summary
A. Updated to reflect new information Hrithin the Plan.
B. Summary level list of changes from previous year.
Seetion 11
Enrollment Projections
Updated projections. See AppendicesA.1 &A.2.
' Section III
Standard of Service
A. Increase of 1 structu�ed leaming classroom at elementary level.
B: Increase of 10 ful{-day kindergarten classrooms at elementary level.
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
A. Add 2 portables at Auburn Mountainview High School.
B. Add 2 portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary.
C. Remove 5 portables at Aubum High School due to the Aubum High School
Modernization and Reconstrubtion Project.
Section V
Pupil Capacity
Reduction in student capacity with removal of 1 portable overall.
� i
4
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013through 2019
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY � �
Section VII
Impact Fees CHANGES TO lMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2012 to 2�13
CPP CPF
DATA ELEMENTS 2012 2013 EXPLANATION
Studerrt Generation Faetors
Single Family Consistent wifh King County Ordinance 11621,
Elementary 0.2610 �.2270 Student Generation Factors are;calculated
MidSchool 0.1300 0.0850 by the school district based on.district
Sr. High 0.1340 0.1290 records of average actual student generation
Mutti-Family rates for new developments constructed
Elementary 0.1720 0.1720 over the last five years.
Mid School 0.0700 0.0700
Sc High 0.0900 0.0960 Mutti-Family data uses 2012 information.
School Construetion Costs
Elementary $21,750,000 $25,000,000 Updated estimates for 2013.
Middle Schaal $42,500,000 $48,800,000 Updated estimates for 2013.
Site Aequisition Costs
Cost per acre 5326,827 $308,155 Updated estimate on land costs.
AI'B0 COSt AIIOW8I1¢6 Boeckh Indei $188.55 $188.55 Updated to projected SPI schedule:.(July�2012)
Mateh%-State 58.49% 59.19% Updated to current SPI schedule.
Mateh%-Distriet 41.51% 40.81% Computed
District Average AV
Single Famiy $223,057 $199,919 Updated from March2013 King County
Dept of Assessmerrts data.
Mufti-Family $68,902 $75,278 Updated from March2013 King County
Dept of Assessments data using weighted
average.
Debt Serv Ta�c Rate $0.98 $2.11 Current Fiscal Year
GO Bond Int Rate 3.&4% 3.74°k Ctinent Rate(Band Buyers 20 Index 3-13)
Section VIII
Appendiees
Appendix A:1 -Updated enrollmentprojections from October 1,2012
Appendix A.2-Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from March 2013.
Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey March2013
;� �'�
5
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .�. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section II
Enrollment Projections
Auhum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
ENROLLMENTPROJEGTONS �
The Aubum School District uses a.modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all
of the DistricYs operations. Table 11.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in
AppendixA:2 tRled"CAPITAL FACILITIESPLAN Enrollment Projections". ThisTable showslhe
anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on theprevious 6 year history of the District under the
assumptions set forth in ttie comp�ehensive projections, AppendixA.1, and the p�ojection for additional
students generatetl from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2.
TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT
11.1 PROJECTIONS March 2013
2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19
GRADE Ac[uai Pro'ected Pro ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro ected
KDG 1098 1127 1158 1191. 1226� 1256� 1285
1 1089 1�150 1182 1215 1250 1280 1309
2 1083 1105 1169 1202 1237 1267 1296
3 1111 1092 1117 1182 1216 1246 1275
4 1038 1149 1133 1160 1227 1257 � 1286�
5 1070 1059 1174 1159 1188 1250� � 1279
.K-5 6489 6682 6932 7109 7343 7557 Z731
6 1041 1081 1073 1189 1176 1200 1261
7 1066 1065 1108 1101 1219 1202. 1224 , � ,
- 8� 1�17 1093 1075 1119 1114 1227 1208 . ,
6-8 3144 3239 3255 3410 3509 3628 3694
9 1200 1221 1302 1287 1336 1329� 1442
10 1278 1205 1230 1313 1301 1344 1336
11 1164 1266 1197 1223 1308 1290 1333
12 1321 1206 1312 1246 1275 1355 1336
-9-12 4963 4898 5041� 5069 5220 5319 5447
70TALS 14,596 14,820 15,228 15,588 16,072 16,504 16,871
GRADES K-12, Actual Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected
K-5 w/K� 1/2 5940 6119 6353 6513 6730 6929 �7089
6-8 �3144 3239 3255 3410 3509 3628 3694
9-Q2 � 4963 4898 504Y 5069 5220 5319 5447
K-12 w/K 1/2 14,047 14,256 14,649 14,992 15,459 15,676 16,229
Note: The District is currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in eleVen schools. This includes hvo state
funded'Full Day Kindergartens at two elementary schools. The State projects to fully implement
Full-Day Kindergarten by 2018.
7
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section III
Standard of Service
Aubum School Distrlct No.408
CAPITAL FACIUTIES PLAN
2013lhrough 2079
STANDARD OF SERVICE
�
The Schoo!ImPact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County;the Ciry of Au6urn and the City of Kent indicate
that each school.district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house
rts projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage
capacity"guidelines for computing state funding support. The iundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines
is to provide a vehrcle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school conslruction projects. By defauR
these guidelines have been used to benchmark the disfricCs capacity to house its student population. The SPI
guidelines do not make adegua(e provision for local district program needs, facility configuratiohs, emerging
educaGonal reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard
of Service addresses those:local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect
on tFie space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities isshown below for each grade articulation
pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without
accompanyirtg computations.
OVERVIEW
The Aubum School District operetes fourteen elementary schools housing 6,489 students in grades
K through 5. For Kinde�garten students;592 of the 1,098 attend 7/2 days throughout the year and 5,491 students,
grades 1 through 5, plus 506 kindergartners, attend on.a full day basis. When converted to full time
equivalents,the K-5 enrollment is 6;193. The four middle schools house 3,144 students in gredes 6 through 6.
The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one altemative high school, housing 4,963
students in grades 9 through 12.
CLASS SlZE
The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the
student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective
bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space.
The currentpupiVteacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 26.5 students,per
teaclier. Consistent with this st�ng limit, room capacities are set at 26.5 studentsper room at grades
K-5. At grades6-12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for eacfi grede
articulation level, less the computed reductioo for the Aubum School District Standard of Service,
determines the DistricYs capacity to.house projected pupil populations. These reductionsare shown
below by grade articulation level.
ELEMENTARYSCHOOLS
STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DfSABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Au6um School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe
disabilitiesat the elementary school level which currently usesnine classroomsto provide for 84 students.
The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of
capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rete compared to
total elementary population.
ADAPTNE BEHAVIOR
The Aubum School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior
disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students.
The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 26.5 each = (27)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (27)
9
Aubum.SChool�.DIStNCC.NO.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013through 2019
STANDARD OF SERVICE
�
SPEC/AL+EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Aubum SchoolDistrict operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special
education students requiring instruction to address their specfic.disabilities. FouReen standard
ciassrooms are required to house this+program. The housing requirements for this program exceed
the SPI space guidelinesby seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth
in program is larger than the total elementary population.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 7 rooms�26.5 each = (186)
Loss of Temporery Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
TotalCapacity Loss (186)
NATIVE AMER/CAN RESOURCE ROOM
The Aubum School Dishict operdtes two resource rooms to support the education of Native American
students at the elementary level. Two standard ciassrooms are fully dedicated to serve these students.
Loss of Permanerrt Capacity 2 rooms @ 26:5 each = (53)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26:5 each = 0
Total Capaciry Loss (53)
HEAD START
The Aubum School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children
insix sections of 1!2 day in.length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utiiizes
th�ee standard elemerrtary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements
for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
: Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (80)
- Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (80)
EARLY CHIIDHOOD SPEC/AL EDUCAT/ON
The Aubum School Distrid operates a pre-school program for young children with disabilities below
age five. This program is housed at seven different elemerrtary schools and currently uses 10
standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI
space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 26.5 each = (265)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity�oss (265)
READING LABS
The Aubum School District operates a prog2m for students needing remediation and additional
language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in
each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have nomstandard rooms available,thus
they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this progrem are not
p�ovided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Lossof Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 26.5 each = (106)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ Z6.5 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (106)
10
Aubum School DisMCt No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
STANDARD OF SERVICE
Mus►c RooMs
The District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom aYeach etementary
school for music instrudion. The housing requiremeMs are notprovided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Gapacity 14 rooms @ 26.5 each= (371)
Loss of Temporary Capaeity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
ToWI Capacity Loss (371)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM
The Aubum School District aperates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students
leaming English asa second language. Thisprogram requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not
provided fo�in the SPI space guidelines.
Lossof Permanent Capaciry 14 rooms @ 26.5 each = (371)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (371)
SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM
The Au6um School DisUict provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted
elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade
level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms 4hat are
not provided for in the SPI spaceguidelines.
Loss aF Pertnanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 26.5 each = (212)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms Qa 26.5 each = 0
Total Capaciry Loss (212)
i I
F/FMENTARY LEARNING SPEC/ALIST PROGRAM �
_. _. _ . . _ . _
The Aubum Schobl District provides a leaming specialist progrem to increase literacy skills for
first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and cunenUy
has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as puliing out students into
designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools.
Loss of PertnaneM Capacity 14 rooms�26.5 each = (371)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26:5 each = 0
ToWI Capacity Loss (371)
FULL DAY K/NDERGARTEN
The Aubum School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten progrems to increase academic skills for
kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition,TiUe I funds and currenUy
there are hvo schools receiving state funding for 2012-'13 school year. The district is utilizing 26
classrooms at eleven of the fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space
guideiines for this program by 13 classrooms..
Lossof Permanent Capacityl3 rooms @ 26.5 each = (345)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 26.5 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (345)
i i
11
Aubum School Disfict No.�408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2015 tlfrough 2019
STANDARD OFSERVICE
i MIDDLE SCHOOLS
3PEGAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Auburn School District operates a resaurce room program for each grade at the middle school level.
This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address theirspecific
disabilities: Eight classrooms are required at the.middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students.
The housing requirements for this program are notentirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
ADAPTNE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION
Ttie Aubum Scfiool Distnct offers a self-contained program forstudents with moderate to severe behavior
diabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses one classroom. The housing
requirements for this program are.provided for in the SPI space allocations.
STRUCTURED LEARN/NG CENTERAND DEVELOPMENTALLYDISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION
The Auburn School District operates five structured leaming classroomsat the middle school level for
students with moderete to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with
profound disabilities. Three of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space ailocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Eapacity Loss (90)
M/DDLE.SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS
The Aubum School District operates a minimum of one computerlab at each middle school.This program
utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program
are not provided forin the SPI space guidelines.
l �
Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms � 30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (120)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE
The Aubum School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students
learning English as a second language. Thisprogrem requires four standard classrooms that are not
provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30.each = (120)
Loss of Temporary Capacity O rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (120)
ROOM UTlLIZATION
The Auburn School District provides a comprehensivemiddle schoolprogram tha4 includes
elective options in:special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activitiesare
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available
teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 ident�es 148 teaching stations available in the
mid-level facilities. The utilization pattem results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations.
Loss ofPermanent Capacity 8 rooms@.30 each = (240)
Loss of Temporary Capacity0 rooms @ 30 each = D
Total Capacity Loss (240)
12
� Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
STANDARD OF SERVICE
I
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
SEN/OR H1GH COMPUTER LABS
The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This
program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn.
The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each= (210)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total Capacity Loss (210)
ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE
The Aubum School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students
IearningEnglish as a second language. This program requires three standard classroomsthat are not
providedfor in tRe SPl space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90)
Loss ofTemporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (90)
ADAPTNE BEHAVIOR SPEClAL EDUCATION
The Aubum School District offers aself-contained program for students with moderate to severebehavior
diabilities. TFie program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing
requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space ailocations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) 1
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (30)
STRUCTURED LEARNlNG CENTER PROGRAM
The Aubum School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for studentswith.
moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided
for in the SPI space guidelines.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each= 0
Total CapacityLoss (150)
SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS
The Aubum Schoof District operates a resource room program at the senior high le4el for special
education students requi�ing instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current
high school progrem requires 10 classrooms to provide program tomeet educational needs of
the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations.
Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 30 each = (270)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0
Total Capacity Loss (270)
i )
13
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2073 fhrough 2019
STANDARD OF SERVICE. .
PERFORMlNGARTS CENTERS
Aubum High School'includes25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The
SPI Inventory includes this space when,computing unhoused student capaciry. This space was
not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a
community center for theperforming arts: Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet
computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms..
Loss of Permanent Capaciry 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250)
ROOM UTILIZATfON
The Aubum School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous
elective options in special interest areas. FacilRies to accommodate special inferest activities are
not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district ayerages 95% utilization of all available
. . _
teaching stations.There are 185ieaching stations ayailable in tFie senior high facilities. The utilization
pattern'results in.a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations.
Loss ofPermanent Capacityl0 rooms Q 30 each= (300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @30 each = 0
Total'Capacity Loss (300)
STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS
ELEMENTARY
Loss of Permanent Capacity= (2,387)
Loss of Temporery Gapacity 0
, Total Capaciry Loss (2;387)
MIDDLE SCHOOL
Loss of Permanent Capaciry= (570)
Loss of Temporery Capaciry 0
Total Capacity Loss (570)
SENIOR HIGH
Loss of Pertnanent Capacity= (1,300)
Loss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capacity Loss (1,300)
TOTAL
Loss of Permanent Capacity= (4,257)
toss of Temporary Capacity 0
Total Capaciry Loss (4,257)
1
14
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section IV
Inventory of Facilities
Aubum School District No.a08
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2013 throueh 2019
. INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
i I Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities.
Table IV2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable
facilities to:
1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school
populations thffi would otherwise require continual redistric[ing,
2. make space available for changing program requirementsand offerings determined by unique
student needs, and
3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed.
Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on
existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.)are
not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding rebcatable
classrooms.
Table Permanent Facilities District Schoof Facilities
IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity
(December2012)
Buildin Ca acit Acres . Address
Elementa Schools
Washin ton Elementa 486 5:40 20 E Street Northeast,Aubum WA, 98002
Termina�Park Elementa 408 6��� 1101�D Street Southeast,Aubum WA 98002
.Dick Soobee Elementa 477 10:50 1031 14th��Street Northeast,Aubum WA,98002
Pioneer Elementa 441 6.30 2301�.M Street Southeast,Auburn WA, 98002
Chinook Elementa 440 8.75 3502 Aubum Wa South Aubum WA 98092
Lea Hill Elementa 450 10.00 30908124th Avenue Southeast Aubum WA 98092
Gildo Re Elementa 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast Auburn WA, 98002
Eve reen Hei hts Elem. 456 8.09 5602South 316th Auburn WA 98001
AI ac Elementa 497 10.60 31�Milwaukee Boulevard.North�, Pacific WA 98047_
Lake View Elementa 559 16.40 16401 Souttieast 318th Street,Autium WA,98092
�.HazelwooH Elementa 580 12.67 11815 Souttieast 304th Street,Aubum WA,.98092
Ilalko Elementa 585 12.00 301 Oravetr.Place Southeast,Au6um WA 98092
Lakeland Hills Elementa 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen.Way SE,Aubum WA, 98092
Arthur Jacobsen Elementa 614 10.00 29205132 Street SE,Aubum WA, 98092
ELEM CAPACITY 7,136
Middle Schools
Cascade Middle School� 829 17.30. 101524th Street Northeast Aubum W 98002
OI m ic MiddleSchool 921 17.40 1g25 K Street 5outheast Auburn WA 98002
Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620116th Avenue Southeast,Auburn WA 98092
Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Aubum WA,98002
'�. MS CAPACITY� 3,430
Senior Hi h Schools
West Auburn Hi h School 233 5.10 401 West Main SVeet, Autium WA 98001
Aubum Senior Hi h 2 101 15.60 800 Fouith Street Northeast,Aubum WA 98002
Aubum�Ri4erside HS 1,387 33.00 ,501-0reveti.Road Aubum WA,98092
Autiurn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900124�'Ave SE Auburn WA 98092
SH CAPACITY 5 164
��� TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732
16
� 7 �75. -�� i �'i ����asi,r -.� -i-s�..t �� y.. A.�.• �_„ .__ a �
A-y�l� �� f� ^r��t,�.'�i�Ri��fN�zl'1 .'ci�'< ?a��y'��"''' Rpfs��j�L�- E��"�'T. ?, l��Ll\ ��.`� � �.
��''�`.��J$�.�:, ,���4�` ���-�in+`�����L�..JT_�� � , �'�'C')�" ��R�� � .,,,� > r
lFYlkEf 1f � � � r".� c `tt i� ., � �'i . ��' '� ltl i�i' �
�7� �r'�w i�-� �a.�►�'I '� / � t��i� ~ � 1� � /�
.
, : .
�'� � t ° '•%�� {a . �1
���
'•^}�E2�'EC ' � � �� � �� . r. ,�,� �s- ;.d�' : � � �
. _ ., �,.
v.1+E'�irfi�Y�k �� 7��f! '�: R�■ �,t . + r��
`�`�')•r��R��, � ��n�...� ��.�! ' f/ '`'� �� � �..._.R�i -
� ` _� � � � �'- i �^�Na :n� �� . .�
� 4 _ .
i - %
�•��y , � �I�
e
��`;�#��t�,,�^ �� a,t b F�i '� � Y�#f��`�S�"�� y'd� �'►,a. �,,, *�'•'
�' _ 'iG'-�;t � - j t���1l19�l=�"r�' :.�'"� ' ��'. J'. � .'+� , � . •�. _
7� � �
,..
.
��^� _ ;f ,���*+��y�{�����7`���-'�r J. `� �� ..
�,��'�r� � Q •i�c.j€�4((`���1��i����ft' , �3 � �. �� lt �'
fi�►�t1�1. . . }' -
t �
� � � o f iM'r,�',f''a3'-�'�:is.,.��s'��,`��`y� �
�
,1 �� , ����► � -- �`�h:�
� . � ��� � �� � ,.:;
� 1 +' `,�},it�� 6`` rer � s�li .� �''.e r
� � � � �
���ti e l�j h,i� c�'�lMS ! cid��X•�� �� � t � .:� . i. .i u
� j 4 ,
....��in �(����{J.� �.� r��G'G� a `y� �. � �C', a�
�c:.�r —::��-- �� ��� - ���,, � , �
�i�i.'�3�F��� ���� 4 ,#�,� �� s ,:, \ �. .
R�► �� ��'1 '�r�- t I �,° y �
r� � � �. , � .,
�v~��`"��� n�r.!���.n ��G39�C �kR�' _ �;€�i�.., '`�.li � c
��. . ,�iOl�i�� w���� � t���Y=. ��W� �if��te+�i, -
��, 1 . I? �" ' , +�"' 7
R�AI��I��j •iw� ij�s�ss��'��`t��'��,7r','-.. .,�.\ ;t i . �.\'G. ` ,�'��_'.�.� 7 P,`.� ���.
�
� t� R, '
r 3i i
��II`P•��I r"z�,���'.. }? . `�� �^ia�� ���' . .�
H 1111��k�Ep ,r � • C R� � , �'f�t �� �� — � � � �'-f
��r�S.F�GSL�'� �!�'"{ i��'��� �� - yK ��� - �-- •
��jA71l�119'��;�•��r'��� . ��I�li� ' � �� � � } � �
MHS.f�f14�1 ii�4• i� i. ^ 9r '�-± '�- ..
((�}}!�1�1!11/��+ eAi i �I�,ss 1 �,�
i�i}L�i:w111!I\l'0.�C��r�I-^J�r�Si�� �.�� i
p� t�c� ��ff�t!—,��M ^r;? _ � ',
t�� PI�°, ruE•��usn°c�+r'--�• ����
t�� n� ��t� (tat�+R�l�', ��"� 1 f � � � 1 - �:
,P+�'C��I!��{(�1,�i9�J�+it� n , {i ?'!�r �::±��'[-��
E�IIIIII�1�'�. .l�tl1��.��{���'l��� �Ni � I
��
�� t�IIU �'r�:�'�,�'�{� '�� �
���'� ��, �4 l f�" �����. I�c
' 1��l. �i!�.�:��t.,._ ■t �6 � il
����� �� .t�`���� ��� , �
�� �� .,� � � � , � , I
�� �i'� �. � ��t , ��,,,; � �
�w,�� �
�-. i., _ � �,_. � 1�, A���y,�
R �
:�� -"i ��� �.."'�j��ly�� f
x
Aubum School��,DisMd No.408
cnwTn�Fnc�unes Puw
2019 lhrough 2079
i� '� INVENTORY OF FACILITIES
TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABCE
N.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY
March 2073
Elementa Location 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 201T-18 201&19
Washington 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Terminal Park 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Dick Scobee 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Pioneer 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
Cfiinook 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
Lea Hill S S 5 5 5 5 5
Gildo:Rey 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Evergreen Heights 0 0 0 2 2 2 2
Alpac 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
HazeNvood 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ilalko 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
� Lakeland Hills Elementary 2 4 4 4 4 4 4
ArtFiurJacobsen Elementa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL UNITS 32 34 34 36 36 36 36
TOTAL CAPACIN 648 901 901 954 954 954 954
MiddleScfiool:Location� 2072-13 2013-14 ' 201415 201516 201617 2017-18 2018-19
Cascade 0 0 0 0 2 2 2
Olympic 0 0 0 0 2 2 2
Rainier S 5 5 7 7 8 8
Mt.Baker 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
TOTAL UNITS 13 13 13 15 19 20 20"
TOTAL CAPACITY 390 390 390 450 570 600 600
Sc Hi h SchoolLocation 2012-13 � 2013-14 201415 201516 2016-17 2017-18 201&19
West Aubum 0 0 0 0 1 1 7
Aubum High School 12 7 7 0 0 0 0
Aubum High School-•TAP 1 1 1 1 1 �1 1
Aubum Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13
Aubum Mountainview 0 2 2 2 4 4 4�
TOTAL UNITS 26 23 23 16 19 19 19
TOTAL CAPACITY 780 690 690 480 570 570 570
•TAP-Trensition Assistance Program for 1&21 year oId studer�s wkh�.special needs.
COMBiNED TOTAL UNITS 71 70 70 67 74 75 75
COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,018 1,981 1,981 1,884 2,094 2,124 2,124 _
'Note:Reduction of portables at Aubum High Schoof is due to the Aubum High School Modemization and
Reconstruction ProjecL
18
Auburn School District No. 4U8
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section V
Pupil Capacity
Aubum School Districl No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIE$"PLAN
2013 through 2018
au��c,aena�rv
` While the Aubum SchoolDistrict uses the SPI inventory of pertnanent facilities as the data from
whieh to detertnine space needs,the DistricYs educational program requires more space than that
provided for under the formula. This add'Rional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in
Section III, Standard of Service. The DistricYs capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for addRional
space W house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded
facilities.The combined effect of these adjustrnents is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below.
Table V.1 shows the DisticYs capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units.
Ta61e Y.1
Capacity
WITHrelocatables 2012-13 201314 201415 201r16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19
A. SPICapacity 15,732 15732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15;732 16,532 �
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550
t/ A:2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800
B. CapacityAdjustments 2,226 2,289 2,289 2,469 2,409 2,289 2,288
C. Net Capacity 13,506 13,443 13,443 13,263 13,323 14,243 14 793
D. ASD Enrollment 14,596 14,780 15,196 15,612 16,210 16;655 17,041
3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,090) (1,337) (1,753) (2,349) (2,887) (2,412) (2,248)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
IncludeRelocatable 2,018 1,981 1,981 1,884 2,094 2,124 2,124
` 2/ Exclude SOS 14 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244
Total Adjustments (2,226) (2;289) (2,289) (2,469) (2,409) (2,289) (2,289)
Table V.2
Capaelty
WITHOUTreloeatables 2012-13 201314 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017=18 2018-19
A. SPICapacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15;732 15,732 15,732 16,532
A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550
1/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800
B. Capacity Adjustments 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 ,
C. NetCapacity 11,488 11,488 11,488 11,488 11,488 12,288 12,838
D. ASD Enroilment 14,596 14,780 15,196 15,612 16,210 16,655 17,041
3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,108) (3,292) (3,708) (4,124) (4,722) (4,367) (4,203)
CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS
2l Exclude SOS 14 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244 4,244
Total Adjustments (4,244) (4,244) (4,244) (4,244) (4,244) (4,244) (4,244)
1/ New facilities shown in 2017-18 and 201&19 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan.
2J The Standard of Servica represents 25.38°/a of SPI'capacity. When new facilities are aildeii tFie Standard
of Service computations are decreased to 23.35°k of SPI capacity.
( 3/ SWdents beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons,Jibrary,theater, shared teachingspace).
20
Aubum School DlsMct No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2073 through 2019
PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY
@ SPI Rated Capaeky ,
March 2013
A. Elemerrta Schools
Buildin 2012d3 2013-14 2014=15 2015-16 201&17 201718 2Q1&19
Washington 486 486 486 486 486' 486 486
TertninafPark 408 408 408 408 408 408 408
DidcScobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477
Pioneer� 441 441 441 441 441 441 441
Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440
Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450
Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 351
E4ergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456
Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497
lake Vew 559 559 559 559 559 559 559
Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580
Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585
Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594
ArthurJacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614
Elementa #15 550
ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7;138 7,138 7,138 Z,138 7,688
B. Middle Schools
euildin 2012-13 2013-14 201415 :2015-16 2016-17 _2017-18 201&19
Cascaiie 829 829 829 829 829 829 829
Olympic 921 921 921 921 921� 921 � 921
Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 �
Mt.Baker 837 837 837 ' 837 837 837 837
Middle School#5 800 8D0
MS CAPACITY _ 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 4;230 4,230
C. Senior Hi h Schools
Buildin 2012-13 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017=18 201&19
WestAubum 233 233 233 233 233 233 233
Aubum 2,101 2,101 2;101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101
Aubum Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387
Aubum�.Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443� 1,443 1,443 � 1,443 1,443
SH-CAPACITY� �: 5,164 5.164 5.164 - - 5.164 � -5.]64 �. 3.164 . �5,164.
COAABME�CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 75,732 15,732 76,532 17,082
21
Aubum School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section VI
Capital Construction Plan
Aubum School DlstACl No.448
CAPITAL FACILITIES PUIN
2013through 2019
CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
( 1
The formal process used tiy the Boerd to address curcent and future facility needs began in 1974
with the formation ofa community wide citizens committee. The resuR of this committee's workwas
published in the document tiUed'Guidelines for Deve/opment.' In 1985 the Board formed a second
Ad Hoc citizens cwmmittee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the DisVict for
subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document tiUed Directions for
the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc ciUzens committee to make
recommendations for improvements to the DistricYs programs and physical facilities. The committee
recommendations are published in the document tiUed 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century--
A Gommunitylnvolved.'
The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the Disfict develop plans for the implementation,
funding, and deployment:of technology throughout the DistricYs programs. The 1996 Bond
proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate 4echnological
appliqtions. The 1998 Cagital Levy provided funding to furfher deploy technol.ogy at a levei
sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and departrnerrt. In 2005 a
replacement technology levy was approvetl to continue to support technology across all facets of the
DistricYs teaching, leaming and operations.
In addition to the technology needs of the District,the Ad Hoc cammittee recognized the District
must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must
pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation inGuded
commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments.
A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years
to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire
school sites. I I
During the 1997-98 school year, a JointDistrict Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Aubum and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the schooi
population from an area that includes a large developmerrt known as Lakeland South. Lakeland
South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southem boundary of the Aubum School District.
On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint_meeting of 4he
Aubum and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Aubum SchoolBoard adopted
Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustrnent of the boundaries of the Disffict
in accordance wRh the Ad Hoo Committee's recommendation. On June23,1998 the Dieringer
School Board adopted a companion Resolution No.2497-98 authorizing the process to initiate the
adjustrnent of the boundaries in aecordance with tFie Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These
actions resulted in the transfer of an area ftom Dieringer to Aubum containing most of fhe Lakeland
South development and certain other undeveloped properties.
Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the
proposition on.the ballot four times prior to passing in 2003. Each electionwas extremely close to
passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board
determined need for fuRher community study.
1n April of 2002, the Board fortned a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two
items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002:
a. A review of the condusion and recommenda4ions of 1965 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees
related to accommodating high school enrollment growfh. This included the review of
possible;financing plans for new facilities.
b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10
years if a new senior high school is not built.
23
Aubum School DisMa No.408
CAPITALFACILRIES PLAN
2013 through 2019
, CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN
This committee recommended the Board place.the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in
February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71%yes votes. The
school opened in the Fall of 2005.
In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for
Elementary#13 and Elementary#14. In the Fall of 2004,the Aubum School Board passed
Resofution No. 105410 place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters
approved the ballot measure in Febrirary of 2005 at 64.72°�. Lakeland Hills Elementary(Elementary
#13) opened in the Fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary(Elementary#14) is located in the
Lea Hill area and opened in the Fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were buiR to
accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district.
In the.200405 school year;the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study
and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was
the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations
including school size,the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements
program to modemize or replace facilfties based upon criterion.
During the 2D05-06 school,year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the
Aubum and Kent School Boardsto make recommendations on how best to serve the school
_
population that will come from an area thatincludes a number of projected developments in the
north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a
joint meeting oflhe Aubum and Kent Boards ofDirectors. On June 14,2006 the Kent School Board
adQpted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustrnent of the boundaries of
the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006 the
' Aubum School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate
the adjustrnent of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation.
These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School
Districteffective September 29,2006.
In October of 2008,after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made
recommendations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modem¢e or
replace facilities as recommended by the 2D04-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These
recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to 1he school board placing a scho.ol improvement
bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 20.09. Voters did not approve.either
measure that wouid have updated 24 facilitiesand replaced tFiree aging schools. The tioard decided
to place onty a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009,which passed at 55.17%.
Thelevy will fund$46.4 million of needed improvemeM projects at 24 sites over the next seven
school years. Pianning for the replacement of:aging schools has started with educational
specfica4ions and schematic design process beginning'in 2010 for Auburn High School.A future
bond issue will be necessary to fund.these projects.
The schooi district acquired a site for a future middle schoof in 2009 and will need to wnsider
poss'ibilities for a sfte for elementary school#15. The Special Educatian Transition Facility opened
in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old..
In the November 2012 election,the community supported the$110 million bond issue for the Auburn
High School Modemization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. The groundbreaking occurred in
February 2013 and construction has begun. This phased project is scheduled to be completed
within the next three years.
i
2a
� Aubum School District No.408�
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2073 Mrouph 2019
CAPITAL CONS7RUCT10N�PLAN ,
Within the six-year period,the Disfict is projecting 2366 additional students mostly from new
development in the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn vailey areas. This increase in student
population will require the cronstruction of a new middle school and acquiring a new elementary
school site and constructing an elementary school during the six-year window.
Based upon the District's capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation
date included:in Appendix A:3,the District has detertnined that appro�amately eighty-six perceM of
the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the studerits generated from new development,
with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need.
The table below'illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact
timelines are wholly dependent on tF�e rate of growth in the school age population and passage of
bond issues and/or capital irtiProvement levies.
201319 Capital Construetion Plan
March 2013
Projected Fund Project Timelines
Pro'ect Funded Cost Souroe 12-1& 13-14 1415 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19
All Facilities- 2006
Technology Yes $12,000,000 6 Year XX
Modemization Cap Levy
Portables Yes $1,200,000 �Fees � � � � � � x '
�� Property Purchase Impact �
New Elementa No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX '' XX
MuRiple Facility Yes $46,400,000 Capital � � � � �
Im rovements Levy
Band XX XX XX
1/ Middle School#5 No $50;700,000 Impact Fee lan const ! o en.
Bond XX XX XX
1/ Elementa #15 No $2Z;000,000 JmpaaFee lan_ const_ o en
AHS Modemization No $110,000,000 Bond Issue � � � �
1/ lan const const o en
.11 These funtls may be securetl thmugh Iocai bond issues,sale.of real property,impaG fees,and.sta[e matching funtls.
The blatdct curieritly is not ellgible for state assisWnce at the elementary school level for naw consvtiction. The district is ellglble tor
state matching funds for modemlzation. � � -
I 1
25
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section VII
Impact Fees
Aubum School Distric!No.408
CABITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2073 through 2079
/MPACTFEECOMPUTAT/ON(Spdng 20f3J
Middle School#5 within 6 year period
ElemenWry#75 vrilhin 8 year period
L SITE COST PER RESIDENCE
Formula: ((Aaes x Cost r Acre)/Facili �Size x Studenf Faclor-
Site CosU Faciliry Student GeneraUOn Faclor CosV CosV
Acreage Acre Capacity Single Famity Mutti Family Single Famity MuIU Family
Elem(K-5) 12 $308,755 550 02270 0.1720 $1�,52621 $1;156.42
Middle 5ch(6-8) 25 :$0 800 0.0850 0.0700 30.00 -30.00 _
Sr High(9-12) 40 $0 1500 0.7290 0.0960 50:00 $0.00
51,526.21 j1,156.42�
IL PERMANENTFACILITYCONSTRUCT/ONCOSTPERRES/DENCE �
Fortnula: ((Facility Cost/Facili� Size)x StudeM Fador)x(Femianent to Total Squa�e Footage Percentage)
Facility Facility °�Perm Sq FU Studenl Generation Faclor Cost/ CosV
Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Mulli Family Single Family Multi Family
Elem (K-5) $27,000,000 550 0.9653 0.2270 0.7720 $70,757.16 58,150.80
Mid Sch(6-8) $50,700,000 800 0.9653 0.0850 0.0700 $5200.05 $4,282.40
Sr High(9-12) $0 1500 0.9853 0.1290 0.0960 $0.00 $0.00
$75.95L21 $12.433.Y0
lll. TEMPORARYFACIUTYCONSIRUCTIONCOSTPERRES/DENCE
Fortnula: ((Facility CosUFacility Size)�x Student FectoF)x(Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio
Facility Faciliry %Temp Sq FV Student Generation Factor CosV CosV
Single Famity Cost Size Total- Ft �Sin le Famil Multl Fami Sin le Famil Multi Fami
Elem(K�-b) $150,000 26.5 0.0347 02270 0.1720 �$44.56 $33.77
Mid Sch(8-8) �$750,000 30 �0.0347 0.0850 0.0700 �$14.74 $12.14
SrHigh(9-12) �$750,000 30 0.0347 0.1290 0.0960 -$22.37 $18.65
SB1:88 562.55
N. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER'RESIDENCE
FortnWe: (Bcedch Irnkk�x SPI Footage.x District MaYch z Student Factor)
Boeckh SPI State �Student Generation Fador CosV CosU
Index Footage Match �Single Fami Multi Family Single Famity Mulli Famiy
Elem(K-5) $188.55 90 59.19% 0.2270 0:1720 $2,280.04 $1,727.61
MltlSch(8-8) $188.55 � 108 59.19% 0.0850 0.0700 �.$1,024.57 �.$843.72
Sr High(8-12) $0.00 730 59.19% 0.1290 O.D960 $0.00 50.00
__�$3,3W.58 $2,571:34�
—� Aubum SchoW Disfrlct No.408
CABITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Y013 through�2079
V. FAX CREDIT PER RES/DENCE
Formula: E�ressed as�Ire present value of an annuity
TC=PV(IMerest rate,discouM period,average assd value x tax rete)
Ave Resid Curr Dbf Serv 8M Byr Indz Number of Taz Credit Taz Cred'A
Assd Value Tex Rate Mn Int Rate Years Sirgle Famiy Multi Fami
Sirgle Family $189.719 E2.71 3.74% 70 57,48288
MuNi Fami 575.278 $2.11 3.74% 10 51.305.14
VI. pEVELOPERPROV/DEDFAC/IJTYCREDIT
FormWa: (Value ot Site a-FadlitylNumber of dv�elling urdts)
Value No.of UnNs Facility Credit
�Sirigle Femity E0.00 1 d0.00
Multi Femi� $0.00 1 50.00
FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEE9
RECAP Single Mul6
SUMMARY Famil Famil
Sile Coste $1,52821 51,156:42
PermanenlFacllityConstCosts 575,95721 $12,433.20
Temporary Facilily Costs $87.66 $62.55
Stata Match Credif ($3,304.56) ($2,571.34)
Tax Credit (53,482.66) ($1,305.14)
FEE(NO Discounl) 570,797.86 $9,775.69
FEE(50%Diacu�nf) $5,398.93 $4,887.84
Less ASD Discount f0.00 ($1,500.00)
Facilfly Credil $0.00 $0.00
Net Fee 06/1ge0on i5,988.A4 �7,387.84
28
Aubum School District No.408
CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
2019 through 2079
SINGLEfAMILY MULTI FAMILY
IMPAC7 FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem� Mid Sch Sr High
K-5 8-8 9-12 K-6' 8-8• 9-12•
Stident Factor Sirgle Pamily-Fwbum aclual couM(3/13) 0.227 0.085 0.129 0:172 0.070 0.096
New Fac Capacily 550 800 1500 550 800 1500
New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates Feb 2013 S27.00O,OOD $50,700,000 $27,000,000 350.700.000
Middle Scliool Codt Eslimate Feb 2013
Temp Rm Capacity ASD Disirict Slendard of SeMce. 26.5 30 30 26.5 30 30
GredesK-5�28.Santl6-72�30.
Temp Facility Cost Relocatabies,indudirg sRe work,se�up,and fumishirg $150,000 5750,000 5750.000 $150,000 E150,000 E�50.000
Site Ac1eage ASD Districl Standard w SPI Mirdmum 12 25 40 72 25 40
SileCosVAVe Seebelow $308,155 $308,155 5308,155 $308,755 5308,755 $308,155
Pe�m Sq Foolage SPI Rpt#3 daled December 14,2011 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,895,317 1,685,317 1,695,317
Temp Sq Footage 69 portables at 832 sq.0.each+TAP 3500 60,908 60,908 60,908 60,908 60,908 60,908
Tolal Sq Footage Sum ot Permanent and Temporary above 1,756,225 1,756,225 1.756,225 1,758,225 1,756,225 7,758,225
%-Perm FacilNes Permanent Sq.Footage divided by Tolal Sq.Footage 96.53% 96.53% 98.53% 98.53% 96.53% 96.53%
%-Temp Facilities Temporary Sq.Footege divided by Tolal Sq.Footage 3.47% 3.47% 3.47°b 3.47°h 3.47% 3.47%
SPI Sq FUStudent F�om SPI Regulalions 90 108 130 90 108 130
Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for December 2072 5168.55 $188.55 $188.55 $188.55 5188.55 $188.55
Match%-State From SPI Webpage December 2012 59.19% 59.19% 59.79% 59.19% 59.78% 59.19%
Match%-District Computed 40.81% 40.81% 40.81% 40.81% 40.81% 40.81%
DistAverAV KingCountyDepartmentofAssessmenisMarch2013 $799,719 $199,719 5799,779 575,278 375,278 $75,278
(mu10 famiry wefghted average inGudea condos)
�ebt Serv Tax Rale Cuirent Fiscal Year $2.11 $2.11 $2.11 $2:71 52.11 52.11
G.O Bond Int Rate Cwrent Rate-(Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2013) 3:74% 374% 374% 3.74% 374% 3.74%
Site Cost Pio ectlons •smdeM 9enere�bn rere.soiz r«mWwemay
ReceM Property, � Purchase �Purchase Purchase Adjusted Pro�ected Mnual Sites Latest Date Projected
Acquisitians Acreage Year Price CosUACre P2sent Day Infiation Fador Re uired of Acquisition CosUAcre
Lakeland 12.00� 2002 $2,701�,043 5225,087 t310,687
labreda 35.00 2008 $7,807�,789 5217J&1 5223,710
LakelandEasl 27.00 2009 $9,092,160 5336,747 t336,747
Total 74.00� E19.395,002 �5262,W5 5290,387 1�.00% Elementa 2015 5308,155
Auburn School District No. 408
Capital Facilities Plan
2013 through 2019
Section VIII
Appendix
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrotlment Projections
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections
Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey
�1
Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections
, '.,
e
Auburn School District #408
` i Student Enrollment Projections
October 2012
Introduction
The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and cmrent data as a basis for
forecasting the futute. In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions abopt the operant
variables within the data being used. These assucnpaons aze`judgmental"by definition. Forecasting
can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future,or from the known
to the unknown. The attached tabulaz data reviews the history of student enrollment,seu out some
quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors.
The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological,psychological,economic,
and political factors that are present in any demogaphic analysis and projectioa 1'he logic embraces
the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past aze present today,and will
be in the future. It further moderates the imput of singulaz factors by averaging data over thirteen
years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend,which reflecu a long(13-yeaz)and a short
(6-yeaz)base from which to extrapolate:
Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten studenu have been used. The first uses the
average increase or decrease over the past 13-and 6-year rime frame and adds it to each succeeding
year. The second derives what the average percentage Aubum kindergartners have been of live births.
in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project thesubsequent four years.
7'he degree to which the actuals deviate from ffie projections can only be measured after the fact..
. ' � 7'his deviation provides a point of departure So evaluate the effecfiveness of the assumptions and logic
being used to calculate future projecrions. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viabiliry and
credibility of the projections derived by these tecliniques.
Tables
Table 1—Thirteen Year Historv ofOctober I Ersrollmenu-page 3
The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data
shows thepast record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each yeaz.
Table 2—�storical Factors Used in Proiections-page 4
T'his table shows the tivee basic faMOrs derived from the data in Table I. T'hese factors have 6een
used in the subsequent projections. The three facto;s aze:
1. Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels
This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohoR survival:' It is a
measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one gradelevel to the
next.
2. Factor 2 -Average Pup�7 Cltange by Grade Level
This factor is the a4erage change at each grade level over the 13-or 6-yeaz period.
3. Factor 3—Aubarn School District Klndergarten Enrollment as a Funcdon of King
County Live Births.
This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King Counry live
births in the 5 previous years. From tivs information has been extrapolated the
kindergarten pupils expected for the next 4 years.
1
Table 3—Proiection Models—pages 5-13
"Chisset of tables utilizes.the above mentioned vaziables and generates several projections. The
models aze explained briefly below.
❑ Table 3.13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-yeaz average gain in kindergarten
(Factor 2)and the 13-yearaverage change between grade levels(Factor 1). The data is
shown for the district as a whole.
❑ Table 3.6(pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it
shortens the historical to only the most recent 6 years.
❑ Table 3.13A and 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same facton above except Factor 3 is substituted
for Factor2. The kindergarten rates aze derived from the King Counry live births instead
ofthe average gain.
❑ Tables 3E.13,3E.6,3E.13A,3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district
projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade
articulation.
❑ Tables 3MS.13,3MS.6,3MS.13A,3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 gades from the
district projectioa Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
❑ Tables 3SH.13,3SH.6,3SH.13A,3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the
district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by
grade articulation.
❑ Table 4(pg 10)—Collecu the four projection models by grade group for ease of � i
comparison.
❑ Table 5 (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compazed
with acwal enrollmenu. Data is provided in both number and percent formau for the
past 13 yeazs.
Summarv
This yeac we had an increase in enrollment of 233 students after three consecutive years of declining
enrollment.These increases and decreases change our historical average gain in students. Over the
past 6 years the average gain is now .21%annually down from .97%;that equates to average gain of
30 studenu down from 136 in prior projections..
Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the
four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district.
T'he models show changes in[he ne�ct six years:
• Elementary level shows increase ranging from 847 to 850. (page 7)
• Middle School level shows increase ranging from 350 to 456.(page 8)
• High School level shows increases ranging from 160 to 227: (page 9)
The models show these changeslooking forwazd thirteen years:
• Elementary level shows increase ranging from 1498 to 1706. (page 7)
• Middle School level shows increase ranging from 836 to 874. (page 8)
• High School level shows increase ranging from 820 to 958.(page 9)
This data does not factor new developments that aze currently under construction or in the planning
stages.
2
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT �LLMENT FROJECTIONS-October2072
TABLE Thirteen Year History of Oclober 1 Enrollments(Rev tOf12)
� Aetual
GRADE 00-01 07-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 OSO6 06-07 07-08 OBA9 09-10 10-11 77-72 12-73
KDG 912 �846 - 905 922 892 955 941 998 998 1032 7070 7029 7098
1 905 968 900 982 980 963 1012 995 1075 1033 7068 7068 1089
2 974 949 961 909 992 963 iD02 7019 1024 998 7076 7097 1083
3 1031 966 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 7711
4 1071 1077 973 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038
5 1011 1108 1062 7078 957 1065 998 1078 1069 7030 1079 1018 7070
6 99B 1028 11M 7171 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 7647 7063 7041
7 979 1017 1021 1131 7124 1028 7074 1057 7034 1125 7060 1032 1088
8 1003 1004 1026 1052 1130 1137 7072 7033 1076 7037 7712 1046 1017
9 1222 1405 1441 1473 1461 1379 1372 1337 7258 7244 1221 1273 1200
10 1157 1073 1234 1249 1261 1383 7400 1368 1347 7277 1238 1170 1278 -
11 1�7 1090 927 1010 7055 1182 1322 7352 1350 1303 1258 1233 7164
12� 885 930 933 902 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1318 1321
TOTALS 13135 13461 13427 13702 13872 14088 14418 14559 14703 74589 1M82 14363 74588
PerceM of Gain 2:48% (025)% 2.054G (0.22)% 3.04% 2.34%� 0.98% 0.99% (0.78)% (0.73)% (0.ffi)% 7.62%
Pupil Gain 326 (34 275 (30) 418 330 741 144 (114) (10� (119) 233
Average%Gain(or 1 st 6 years. 7.57% Average%Gain ta last 8 yea's 021%
Averege Pupil Galn for tst fi years. -214 Averege Pupil Gain(or last 6 ears �30
Averege% Gain for 13 yeara. 0.89%
Average Pupil Gain(or 13 eaw: 122�
TABLE
tA Grade Group Combinations
KDG 812 846 905 922 692 955 �941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098
K,1,2 2731 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3083 3092 3194 3270
K-5 5844 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 8033 6142 6798 8159 6208 6230 6489
K-6 6842 6942 8845 6885 8755 6891 7091 7749 7294 7799 7249 7293 7530
t-3 2850 2883 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3D24 3095 3181 3283
i-5 4932 5068 4838 4852 4&43 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5188 5201 6391
1 -8 5930 6096 5540 5983 5863 5938 6750 6153 6296 6187 6239 6284 8432
6•8 2980 3049 3151 3294 3274 3169 3744 3097 3206 3198 3213 3141 3144
7-8 1882 2021 2047 2183 2254 2185 2088 2090 2110 2758 2172 2078 2103
7-9 3204 3426 3488 3656 �3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303
9-12 4311 4498 4535 4834� 4663 5032 5241 �5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963
10-12 3089 3093 3094 3761 3202 3853 3889 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763
P712-13 Page 3� October 2072
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS•October 2072
TABLE Factora Used In Projedions FadoF AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS
2 3� AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES
CAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTEN
Factor Averege Pupil Change Belwaen Grade ENDAR LIVE 213rda 1/3ids OF LIVE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A%OF
1 Levels YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS �BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS
73 VEAR BASE 6 YEAR BASE 1873 13,449 8,866 4,483 79160 13,478 818 4.585%
K to 1 57.08 K to 1 43.33 7974 13,493 8,995 4;498 80187 13,524 800 4.436%
1 to 2 12:17 Lto 2 8.00 1975 73;540 9,027 4,513 87182 13,887 588 4298%
210 3 13.92 2 to 3 0.33 1976. 13,761 9,174 4,587 82I63 14,375 698 4.&58%
3�0 4 27.33 3 to 4 30.00 7977 14,882 9,786 4,894 83/84 14,858 666 4.452°,6
4 to 5 21.87 4 to 5 12.W 1978 15,096 10,084 5,032 84I65 18,048 726 4.524%
5 to 8 10.00 5 to 8 2.87 1979 18,524 17,018 5,508 85I88 18,708 792 4.740%
B�0 7 13.25 B to 7 14.83 1980 16,800 17;200 5,600 88I87 77,000 829 4.676%
7to8 9.W� 7.to8 - .(1.17) 1981 17,100 17,400 5,700 87l88 18,241 769 4218%
Bto 9 278.33 8 to 9 193.50 7982 78,811 12,547 6,270 88/69 78,828 877 4.388%
910 70 (67.87) 9�to 10 (5.17) 1983 78,533 12,355 6,778 89I90 18,827 871 4.626%
10to it (75.42) 10to 11 (22.33) 19&4 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 858 4.39896
11to 12 (21.42) 71to 72 37.33 1985 19,778 13,785 6,593 97192 79,893 909 4.589%
fotal 272:75 loWl 3W.83 1986 19,957 13,307 6,850 92/93 21�,852 920 4.210%
Facta 1 is the average gain or bss ot pupils as they 1987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93194 21,624 930 4.301%
move trom one grade level lo ihe nexl. Factor 1 uses 7988 27,034 14,023 7,011 94195 24,062 927 3.853%
the past(72)OR(5)years of charges. 7989 25,576 17,057 8,525 95198 26;358 954 3.819%
1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96197 24.116 963 3.993%
Fador Averege Pupil Change By Grade Level 7997 22,799 15,199 7,600 97l98 20,9?3 978 4.683%
2 � 7992 20,080 73,373 6,667 98/99 21�,573 854 3.959°k
13 YEAR BASE 8 YEAR BASE 1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 849 3.837°h
K 15.50 K 20.40 1994 22,028 14,686 7,343 00/07 24,013 912 3.798%
1 15.33 1.00 18.80 7995 25,005 18,670 8,335 01102 22,717 846 3.724°.6
2 74.08 2.00 12.80 1996 27�,573 14,382 7,197 02l03 2Y.622 905 4.186%
3 8.87 3.00 22.80 1997 21-,848 14,431 7,215 03I04 22,023 922 4:786%
4 (2.75) 4.D0 - (3.80) 7998 22,272 14,808 7,404 04I05 71,075 892 4.041%
5 4.92 5.00 (1.80) 1999 22,007 14,677 7,336 05I08 22,327 9$5 4.277%
6 3.58 8.� 6.80 2000 22,487 14,991 7,496 O6I07 22,014 947 4274%
7 8.92�� 7.00 -5.80 2001 27,778 74,519 7,259 07I08 21:835 996 4.562%
8 1.17 8.00 (320) 2002 27,883 14,575 7,288 08l09 22,242 998 4.487% Last 6
8 (1:83) 9.00 (27.40) 2003 22,437 74,954 7,477 09I10 22,726 1032 4.541% year
10 10.08� t0.00 (18.00) 2004 22,874 15,248 7,625 10111 22,745 1010 4.441% Average
17 8.08, 11.00 (37.60) 2005 22,880 15,120 7,560 11112 23,723 1028 4.338% 4.451Ye
12 38.00 12.00 71.60 2008 24;244 18,163 B4OB1 12N3 24,883 Y09B Aclue/ 4.448%
Pador 2 is fhe average cAange in grade level size 2007 24,902 18.601 8,301 13/14 25,094 iH7 <-Prjcid year
hom 01l02 0R 07/08. 2008 25,190 18,793 8,397 14115 25,101 7f77 <-P�ctd year
� 2009 25,057 18,705 8,352 15I78 24,695 f099' <-p�dd year
2010 24,574 18,343 8:171 16117 24,591 4095� «�cid year
2011 24,630 18,420 8,210 17118 'munber from�OH
Source:Center Mr Health Stadslics.Washinglon Stete Department oi Health
prj7� "+ Pane4 Odober2012
AUBURN3CHOOLDISTWCTSTUDENT JLLMENT'PR09EC710NS-October2072
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.73. Based on 13 Year Hist - '
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ FROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12H3 13N4 1M15 15I16 1&17 17/78� 1&19 19l20 20/21 27122 22123 23-24 24-25 25-26
KDG 1098 1114 1129 1145 1760 1178 Ng1 1207 � 1222 1238 7253 1269 1284 1300
1 1089 1149 1165 7180 1198 7271 1227 1242 1258 1273 7289 1304 1320 1335
2 1083 1101 1161 1177 7792 1208 1223 1239 1254 1270 7285 1301 1318 1332
3 iNi 1097 1N5 1775 1191 1208 1222 7237 1253 1268 1284 1299 1315 1330
4 1038 1138 1124 1142 1203 1278 1234 1249 7265 1280 1298 1311 1327 7342
5 1070 1060 N60 1148 1164 1224 7240 1255 7271 1286 1302 1317 1333 7348
6 1041 1080 1070 1170 7156 7774 1234 1250 1285 7281 1296 1312 1327 1343
7 1088 7054 1093 1083 1183 1769 1187 1247 1263 1278 1284 1309 1325 1340
8 1017 1098 1064 1703 1092 1193 1179 1197 1257 1272 1288 1303 7319 1334
9 1200 1295 7374 1342 7381 1371 1471 1457 1475 1535 1651 1568 1582 1597
10 7278 7132 1228 1308 1274 7313 1303 7403 7389 1408 1488 1483 1499 1514
11 1164 1203 7057 1152 1231 1199 7238 1228 1328 ]314 1332 7392 1408 1423
12 1321 1143 N81 1038 1137 7209 1178 1217� 7206 1307 1293 1311 1371• 1386
TOTALS 14596 74661 14820 15757 - 15554 15871 18126 � 76427 18705 17009 17229 17477 17723 17925
PerceMOfGain 0.45% 1:77% 1.58% 2.62% 2.04% 1.80% 1.87% 1�.69% 1:82% 1.28% 1:44% 7.41% tA4%
Pup� Gain 65 259 � 238 397 317 254 302 278 304 219 249 246 202
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.8 8ased on 8 Year Hislo
ACTUAL PRQ1 PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ P.ROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ � PR0.1
� GRADE 12H3 13/14 14It5 15N6 16117 17/18 18/19� 19Y10 20/21 21@2 22Y13 23-24 2425 25-26
KDG 1098 1718 1139 1159 1180 1200 1220 1241 1261 7282 1302 1322 1343 1363
1 1089 7141 1162 1182 1203 1223 1243 1264 1284 1305 1325 1345 1366 1386
2 1083 1097 1149 1770 7190 1277 1237 1251 1272 1292 1313 1333 1353 1374
3 7711 7083 1097 1750 1170 7190 7277 1231 7252 1272 1292 7313 1333 1354
4 1038 1141 7173 1127 1180 1200 1220 1241 1281 1282 1302- 1322 1343 1363
5 1070 1051 7154 1128 1140 1182 1213 7233 1253 1274 7294 1315 1335 1355
6 1041 1073 7053 1158 1129 N43 1195 1215 7236 1258 1278 1297 7377 7338
7 1088 1056 1088 1068 1171 1143 N57 1210 1230 1250 7271 1291 1312 1332
8 1017 1085 1055 1088 1067 7170 1142 7756 1209 1229 1249 1270 7290 1311
9 7200 1217 1278 1248 1280 1260 1363 1338� 1350 1402 1422 1443 1463 1484
10 1278 1795 1205 1273 7243. 1275 7255 1358 7331 1345 1397 1417 1438 1458
11 1184 1258 1173 1183 1251 1221 1252 1233 1336 1308 1322 1375 1395 1415
12 7321 1195 1287 1204 1214 1282 7252 1284 7284 1367 1340 7354 1408 1426
TOTALS 14598 14701 14953 15133 15418 15710 15956 � 16252 16538 . 18883 17106 77398 77894 17959
PercenfofGain 0.72% 1.71% 1.20% 7�.87% 1.90% 1.b7% -1:86% 1:76% 7.97% �1.44% 7:70% 1.77% 1.50%
Pupil Galn. 105 257 180 284 294 246 297 285 325 243 291 297 265..
Prj12-13 Page 5
October 2012
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2012
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS -
3:13A Based�on BIAh Ralea 8 13 Year Histo
ACTUAL PROJ � PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ .
GRADE 12/13 13114 14/15 15118 16/17 17118 18119 19/20 20l27 21@2 22/23 23-24 2425 2�r28
K 1098 7098 1777 iN7 1099
1 . 7089 1149 1149 1188 1168 1750 �
2 1083 1107 1161 1187 1180 1780 1162
3 1171 1097 1115 1775 1175 1194 7194 1776
4 1038 1138 1124 1742 1203 1203 1221 1222 7204
5 1070 1080 1160 7746 1164 1224 1224 1243 7243 1225
6 7047 7080 7070 7170 1156 1174 1234 7234 7253 1253 7235
7 1086 7054 1093 1083 1183 1169 1187 1247 1247 1266 1267 1249
8 1017 1098 1064 1103 1092 1193 1779 7797 1257 7257 1276 1276 1258
9 7200 1295 7374 1342 1381 1371 1471 1457 1475 1535 1535 1554 1554 1536
10 1278 1132 1228 1306 1274 7373 1303 1403 1389 1408 1468 � 1468 1487 1487
71 1164 1203 1057 N52 1231 1199 1238 1228 1328 1314 1332 1392 1392 1411
12 1327 7143 1181 7036 1131 1209 1178 1277 12� 1307 1293 13N 1371 1371
TOTALS 74596 14646 14893 15102 15438
Percent ot Gain 0.34% 1.69% 7.40% 2.23%
Pupil Gain 50 247 209 336
TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS
3.BA Based on Birtb Rates R 8 Year Histo
ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12113 13I14 14l75 15I16 76/77 17l78 18/19 19Y10 20/21 21/22 22123 23-24 24-25 2rr26
K�G 1098 1098 1117 1177 7099 �
1 1089 1141 1141 1160 7161 1142
2 1083 1097 7749 1149 7168 1169 1150
3 1111 1083 1097 1150 1150 1769 1169 N57
4 1038 1741 7113 1727 1180 N80 1199 7799 1781 �
5 1070 1051 1754 1726 7140 N92 1192 1211 12N 1193
8 1041 1W3 1053 7158 1129 1143 1195 1795 7214 1214 1196
7 1088 1058 1088 1088 1171 1743 1157 1270 1210 7229 7229 � 12N
8 1017 1085 7055 1088 7067 7770 1142 1158 1209, 1209 1227 7228 1210
9 1200 1217 1278 1248 1280 1260 7363 1336 1350 7402 7402 1421 7427 7403
10 1278 1195 1205 1273 1243 1275 7255 1358 1337 1345 1397 1397 1416 1416
11 1784 1258 7173 1183 7257 1227 1252 1233 1336 7308 1322 1375 1375 1393
72 - 1321 1795� 1287 1204 7214 1282 1252 1284 1284 7367 7340 7354 1408 1406
TOTALS 14596� 14681 74910 15048 � 15251 .
Pe�cent of Gain 0.58% 7.56% 0.93% 7:35°� �
Pupil Gain BS' 229 138 203
P�1^.•+ Pa�rs 6 Oclober 2012
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT DLLMENT BROJECTIONS-October 2012
�3E.13 Based on 73 Year Hist
GRADE - 12173 � 13/14 1M15 15/16 18/17 17/18 18119 79@D 20121 21122 22/23 2324 2425 2526
1 7089 1149 1165 1180 17� 1271 7227 1242� . 1258 1273 1289 1304 1320 1335
2 1083 1101 1161 1177 1782 1208 7223 1239 1254 1270 1285 1307 1316 1332
3 1117 1097 1175 7175 1791 1206 1222 1237 1253 1268 1284 1299 1315 1330
4 1U3tl 11:itl 1724 114Y 1'tOJ 1Y78 7134 1Y49 12ti5 1'1tlU 1Y86 1811 182/ 1J4Y
5 1070 1080 1160 7148 1764 1224 7240 1255 1271 1288 1302 1317 1333 1348 yeat year
K-5 TOT 6489 8859 6854- 6965 7705 7243 7336 7429 7522 7815 7708 7807 7894 7987 847 74 8
ercen o n
Pu il Gein 170 795 111 140 �138 93 93 �93 93 93 93 93 93
3E.8 Besed on 8 Vear Histo
GRADE 12173 13174 iM75 15/16 78/17 17l18 18/79 19I20 20121 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 2rr28
1 1089 7747 1i62 1182 7203 1223 1243 1264 1284 1305 1325 1345 1368 1388
2 1083 1097 7149 1170 1790 7211 1231 1251 1272 1292 1313 7333 1353 1374
3 7171 1083 7097 1150 1770 7790 1217 7231 1252 1272 7292 7313 1333 1354 �
4 lU3B 1147 1118 7117 11tlU 1YUU 1Y[U 7'L97 lYtil IYtlY 7JU'L 1:fYY LLIJ 131i3
5 1W0 1051 1754 1126 1740 1192 1213 1233�� 1253 1274 1294 1315 1335 1355 ye e r
K�-8 TOL . .6489 6832 6814 6914 7062 7218 7339 7461 7583 7708 7828 7951 8W3 8195
ercen o n
il Gsin 743 �182 100 148 154 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122
3E.13A Based on Birth Rates 8 13 Year History
GRADE 12/13 13/14 14It5 15l16 78/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20127 27122 22123 2324 2425 2526
1 1089 7149 1149 7188 1168 1150
2 1083 1107 1161 1167 1180 1180 1162
3 iN1 7097 1175 1175 7175 1194 1194 1176
4 tU;ltl it;lH 11'14 it4'L 1YU3 12U3 iZY1 1YZY 1'LU4
5 1070 1080 1160 1148 7184 1224 1224 1243 1243 1225 year
K-5 TOT 6489 8643 6827 6910 6989 500
ercen o am
Pu il Gain 154 183 83 79
3E.6A Based on BiAh Rates&�B Year Hisfay
GRADE 72l13 13/14 1M75 15116 1&17 17l18 1&19 19/20 20/21 21122 22/23 23-24 2425 25-26
1 �1089 7741 1141 1780 1781 1142. . .. �
2 1083 1097 1749 1149 1188 1169 1150
3 1777 1083 109T 1750 7150 1169 1188 1757
4 1US8 7147 171�. �11'L/ 17tlU 11HU iiHkl 11HH 1781
5 1070 1051 1754 1128 7140 1192 7192 7211 1211 ti93 year
K-5 TOT 6489� 66N �-8772 I 6830 8897 408
ercen o. ain
�Pu il Gain 122 �167 58� 87
Prjt2-13 Page7 , Odober2012
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2072
TABLE MIDDLE�SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS:13 Based on 73 Vear Hisl
ACTUAL PRQI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ
GRADE 12/13 13/14. t4115 i5h8 18117 17/18 18It9 19I20 20/21 21/22 22123 2&24. �2425 25-28
8- �1041 7080 1070 1770 1156 7774 1234 7250 1265 1281 1298 1312 1327 1343
7 1U88 1054 7093 7083 1183 1189 1787 7247 7263 1278 1294 13D9 1325 1340
8� 1017 1096 1084 1103 1092 1193. 1179 7197 1257 1272 1288 1303 1319 1334 Byear 13year
.6-8 TOT 3144 3230 3227 3358 3432 3538 3600 3694 3785 3832 3878 3925 3971 4018 456 874
� PercentofGain 2.73% (0.10)% 4.00% 2:26% 3.04% 1.87% 2.60% 2.47% 123% 1.27% 120% 1.18% 1:17%
Pu I Gain 88 (3) 129 76 704 64 94 91 47 47 47 47 47
TABLE MIDOLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS.8 Based a�8 Year�Hisl �
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ - PROJ� PROJ - PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12/73 13/14 1Mi5 15116 1&77 17I18 18119 19I20 20121 27/22 22123 2324 2425 2rr26
6 1041 1073 7053 1156 7729 7143 1195 1215� 7238 1258 1278 1297 1317 7338
7 1088 1056 1088 1068 1171 1143 1157 1210 1230 1250 1271 1291 1312 1332
8 1017 1085 1055 7086 1067 U70 1142 7156 1209 1229 1249 1270 1290 13N 6year 13year
6-8 TOT 3144 3213 3195 3371 3366 3458 3494 3581 3674 3735 3797 3858 3919 3980 350 838
PercentotGain 227% -.56% 3.60% 1.69% 2.85% 1.72% 2.48% 2.60% 1.87% 1.84% 1.67% 1.59% 1.56%
Pupil Gain 69 (18) 115 56 89 39 87 93 67 61 61 61 61
TABLE MIDDIE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
3MS:13A Besetl on Birth Rates&13 Year Histo
ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12H3 73Ii4 14J75 15/16 1&17 17118 18I79 79/20 20121 21l22 22123 23-24 2425 25-28
8 7041 1080 1070 N70 1158 1174 1234 - 1234 1253 7253 1235
7 1088 �1054 1093 1083 1183 1189 1187 1247 1247 7266 1287 7249
8 1017 1098 1064 1103 7092 1193 7179 1197� 42b7 7257 1278 1276 7258 ,Byear 10 year
6-8�T0T 3744 3230 �3227 3358 3432 3538 3800 3878 3757 3777 3778 466 634
PerceM of Gain 2J3% (0:10)% 4:00°� �2.26% 3.04% 1.87°b �2.17% 2.15% 0.51% 0.03% -
Pu il Gafn 86 (3) 129 76 t04 84 78� 7B 79 1
TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS �
9MS.BA Based on Bihh Rates&�6 Year History.
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PRQI PRQI PROJ PROJ PRQI PRQ1 ' PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12/13 73/14 1Mt5 15/16 16A7 77A8 78/19 ,19/20 20l21 21/22 2?123 2324 2425 25-26
6 1041 - 1073- 1053 1156 1129 1143 N85 1185 1214 7274 1198
' 7 1068 1058 1088 1068 1171 7143 H57 1210� 1210 1229 1229 1217
8 1017 1085 1055 1088 1087 1770 H42 1158 1209 1209 1227 1228 72f0 �Byear 10 year
, 8-9�TOT 3144� 32i3 �3195 � 3371 3366 3458 3494 . 3581 3632 - 3651 �, � 3852 � � � 350 508
, PercentofGein �2:21% (0.5fi)°,6 3.60% 1.69% 2.65% 1.12% 1.90% 2.00% 0.53% �0.03%
Pupil Gein 89 (18) 115 56 89 39 86 71 79 7
� pry1' -' Pena:B October 2012
� AUBURN SCHOOL DISTWCT'STUDENT JLLMENT PROJECTION&-Actober2072
TABIE SR:HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SH.13 Based an 13 Year Hist
ACTUAL PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12It3 13/14 7M15 15I18 18/17 77/78 1B/19 79I20 20/27 21l22 22/23 23-24 2425 2b26
9 1200 1295 1374- 1342� 1381 1371 1471 1457 1475 1535 1551 1568 1582 1597
10 1278 1132� 1228 1306 1274 7373 1303 1403 7389 i4D8 1468 7483 1499 1574 �
11 1164 1203 1057 1152 1231 N99 1238 1228 1328 1314 1332 1392 1408 1423
12 1321 1143 1181 1038 1131 1209 1178 1217 1208 1307 1293 1311 1371 7388 Byear 13year
&12 TOT 4963 4773 4840 4836 5017 5093 5190 5305 5399 5563 5643 5752 5859 5927 227 958
Percenlo(Gain (3.83)% 7.40% (0.07)% 374% 1.50% 1.91% 2.21% 1:77% 3.05% 1.43% 7.94% 7.85% 1.06%
Puql Gain (190) 87 (4) 187 75 97 115 94 184 80 109 1 W 82
TABLE SR.HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SH.6 Based on 8 Vear History
ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12/73 73/74 1Mt5 15I18 78/17 17/18 1B/19 19I20 20/21 27122 22123 23-24 2425 2526
9 1200 1271 7278 1248 1280 1260 7363 1336 7350 1402 1422 i443 1463 1484
10 1278 1195 1205 1273 1243 1275 1255 1358 7331 1345 7397 1477 1438 1458
11 1164 7256� 1173 1183 1257 1221 1252 1233 1338 1308 1322 1375 7395 1415
72 1321 1195� 1287 1204 1214 7282 1252 7284 7264 1367 7340 1354 1406 1426 8year 13year
9-12�T0T�, 4963 4856� 4943 4908 4988 5038 5723 5210 5280 5422 5481 5588 5702 5783 160 820
PercentotGain �(2.15)% 1.79% (0.71)% 1.83% � 7.00% 7.69% 7.71% 7:34% 2.88% 1.09% 1:95% 2.0396 �1:43%
Pu 'I Gain (107) �87 (35) BO 50 85 87 70 142 59 107 114 82
TABLE SR:HIGH PROJECTIONS
35H.13A�, Based on Birth Rates 8 13 Year Histo
� ACTUAL PROJ PRQ1 PROJ PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12/13 13/14 1M75 75/16 1&17 17/78 18119 19/20 20/21 21122 22/23 23-24 24-25 2528
9 1200 1295 1374 7342 7387 Y371� 1471 1457� 1475 1635 7535 1554 1554 1536
10 1278 1132 1228 7306 1274 7373 1303 1403 1389 1408 1468 7488 1487 7487
17 1164 1203 1057 1152 1231 7199 1238 1228 1328 7314 t332 1392 1392 1471
12 1321 1143 1181 1036 1131 1209 1178 1217 1208 7307 1293 1311 7371 1371 6year 13year
&72 TOT 4963 4773 4840 4838 5077 5093 5790 5305 5399 5563 5827 5725 5804 5805 227 842
Pe�centofGain (3.83)% 1.40% (0.07)% 374% 1.50% 7.87% 2.27% 1.77% 3.05% 1.15% 1.73% 1.39% 0.02%
Pupil Gain (190) 67 (4 181 75 97 115 94 164 64 97 79 1
TABLE SR.HIGH PROJECTIONS
3SH.BA Based on BIM Rates 8 6 Year Histo
ACTUAL PR0.1 PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1
CaRADE 12I13 13/14 14/15 15116 1&17 17/18 1B/19 19Y20 �20121 21@2 22/23 2&24 2425 2b26
9 1200 1277 1278 - -1248 1280 7280 1383 1338 1350 7402 1402 1421 1421 1403
10 1278 1195 7205 1273 7243 1275 1255 1358 1331 1345 1397 1397 7478 1416
11 1184 1256 1173 1183 1251 1227 7252 1233 1338 1308 7322 1375 7375 7393.
t2 1327 1195� 1287 1204 7214 1282 7252� 1284 7284 7387 1340 1354 7406 7408, Byear 73year
412 TOT 4963 4656 4943 4908 4988 5038 5723 5210 5280 5422 5481 � 5546 5617 5678 180 655
PercenfofGain (2.75)% 1J8% (0.71)% 1.83% 1,00% 1.89% 1�.N% 1:34% 2.88% 0.77% 1.58% 1.29% 0.02%
Pu il Gain (107) 87 (35) 80 50 �85 87 70 742 39 85 72 1
prj12-13 Page 9 OctoDer 2012
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2012
TABLE PROJECTION.COMPARISONS
4 BY GRADE GROUP
KINDERGARTEN
�ACTUAL PROJ PROJ � PROJ PROJ�� PR0.1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
�GRADE 12l73 73N4 14/15 15116 18/17 17I18 18It8 19I2D 20121 21122 22123 23-24 24-25 25-28 6 year 13 year
E.13 7098 1114 1729 1145 1160 1178 1191 7207 1222 7238 1253 7289 1284 1300 93 202
E.8 1098 1118 1139 N59 1180 1200 7220 7241 1261 1282 1302 1322 1343 1363 122 265
E.13A 1098 1098 1117 1717 1099 - .
E.6A 1098 1098 1117 7717 7099
GRDt—GRDS
ACTUAL PROJ � PROJ PROJ PRQ1 PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR0.1 PROJ
GRADE 12/13 13/14 14Ii5 15116 1&77 17/18 1Bl19 19120 20121 21/22 22/23 2324 24-25 25-26 6year 73year
E.73 5391 5545 5725 5820 5945 6087 6745 6222 6300 6377 6455 6532 6610 6687 754 1296
E.6 5391 5573 5675 5755 5882 6016 6778 8220 6322 8424 8526 6628 6730 6832 727 1441
E.13A 5391 5545 5710 5793 5890 �
E.6A 5391 5513 5655 5712 5798
GRD 6—GRD 8
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ
GRADE 12113 13114 14/75 75176 18177 17178 78/19 19I20 20/21 21R2 22123 2324 24-25 25-26 6year 13year
MS.13 3144 3230 3227 3358 3432 3538 3600 3694 3785 3832 3878 3925 3971 4018 456 874
MS.B 3744 3213 3195 3371 3366 3456 3494 3581 3674 3735 3797 3858 3919 3980 350 836
MS.13A 3144 3230 3227 3356 3432 3538 3600 3878 3757 3777 3778 �
MS.6A 3744 �3273 3795 3317 33fi6 3458 3494 3581 �3832 3651 3852
GRD 9—GRD 12
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRQI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ FROJ
GRADE 12l73 13/14 1M15� 15l18 7&17 77l18 1&19 7&20 20121 21l22 22123 2324 2425 �2&28 Byear 13year
SH.13 4963 4773 4840 4836 5077 5093 6190 5305 5399 5583 � 5643 5752 5859 5927 227 958
SH.6 4963 - 4856 4943 4908 4988 5W8 5123 6270 �5280 5422 �5481 �5588 5702 5783 180 820
SH.13A 4963 4773 4840 4836 5017 5093 5190 5305 5399 5563 5827 5725 5804 5805 227 842
SH.6A 4963 4856 4843 4808 4988 5038 5123 5210 5280 5422 5481 5548 5817 5878 180 655
DISTRICT TOTALS �
ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PRW FROJ PROJ
GRADE 12/13 13/14 14115 15I16 1&17 17118 18l19 1W20 2W21 21l22 22123 23-24 2425 25-28 Byear 13year
� 3.13 14596 74fi81 14920 15157 75554 75877 78128 18427 76705 17009 17229 17477 77723 17925 1530 3329
3.6 14596 14701 14953 15733 75416 15770 15956 18252 16538 16863 17106 17396 17694 77959 1380 3363
3.13A 14598 14648 74893 15102 75438
3.6A 74596 14681 14910 15048 15251
Prj1^..�.. Pa^°.10 October 2012
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT' OCLMENT PROJECTIONS-October3012
TABLE PROJECTIONCOMPARISONS�
5 BY GRADE GROUP
Total = OdoDer 1 AUUaI Count AND Projecled Counts Prj 3.13- 73 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Averege Kdg Increase
Diff = Number Projec6on is uMer(-)or over Actual Prj 3.8 - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Averege Kdg Increase
% = Percent ProjeGion is under(•)o�over Adual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birih Rales
Prj 3.BA- B YEAR HISTORY 8 Kirg Cty Birth Ralea
Gratles 2000-01 2007-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
K-5 Total DiH % 7otal Diff % Total �ifl % Total Diff °b Total Diff ^�
ACTUAL 5844 �ooc �ppt 5914 x�a �ooc 5741 x�c z�ac 5774 �ocx x�ot 5735 �oac na
Ph 3E.13 5817 (33) (0.54)% 5827 (87) 3.15% 5723 (78) (0.31)% 5855 (179) (2.06)% 5767 26 (0.49)%
P�j3E.8 5664 (780) (0.98)% 5802 (172) 2.74% 5735 (6) (0.10)% 5662 (172) (7.94)% 5821 86 (0.34)%
PfJ3E.13A 5919 75 (2.84)% 5839 (75) 7.51% 5743 2 0.03% 5605 (169) (2.93)% 5709 (26) (1:24)%
P 3E.BA 5895 51 (2.93)°h 5831 (83) 7.15% 5776 35 0.61% 5631 (143) (2.48)% 5758 21 ,
(0.81)%
G�ades 200Q-01 2007•02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
6-8 Total DIN % To�al� Uiff % Totel Difl % Total DiH % Total DiH %
ACTUAL 2980 �aa �ooc 3049- �aa �aoc� 3151 boc nnc -3294 �oa na 3274 ��ooc� �ooc
Prj3E:13 �3023 43 (2.84)%�� 3025 (80) (2.62)% 3785 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (2.43)% 3295 21
(8.68)%
P�j 3E.8 3009 29 (2.70)%� 3011 (75) (2.46)% 3192� 47 7.30% 3218 Q8) (2.37)% 3311 37 (8.08)%
P�3E.13A 3023 43 (2.64)% 3025 (80) (2.62)% 3185 34 1.08% 3214 (80) (2.43)% 3295 21 (8:88)%
P 3E.BA 3009 29 (2:70)% 3011 (75) (2.46)95 3782 41 7.30% 3218 (78j (2.3n% 3311 37
(6.06)%
G�adea 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 �2004-05
'8-12 Total Diff % Total DIR °�6 Total Dift % Total D'rff % Total DHf %
ACTUAL 4311 xrx �opc 4498� xbc - x�c 4535� �aac xbc 4834 na �ax 4663 mt x�tx
Pr)3E.13 4389 58 2.74% 4455 (43) (0$2)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 (4) (0.09)% 4783 120 5.90%
P�3E.6 4394 83 1.5196 4476 (22) (1,49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4839 5 0.17% 4769 106 3.69%
Prj3E.13A 4369 58 2.74% 4455 (43) (0.32)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 .(4) (0.09)96 4783 720 5.90%
P�j 3E.BA 4394 83 1.51% 4476 (22) (1.49)% 4594 59 1.30% 4639 5 0.11% 4769 106 3.69%
All 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
Grades Total Diff % Total Difi % . Total DiH % Total Difl % Total Diff %
ACTUAL 13135 x�ec �ooc 13481 �aa �ooc 73427 x�oc x�a , 13702 x�a not 13872 xpc xxx
P�j3E.t3 73203 68 0.52% � 73307 (tb4) (0.30)% 13485 58 0.97% 13489 (203) (7.48)% 13839 167 1:22%
Prj 3E.6 13067 (68) (0.52)% 13289 (772) (0.82)°h 13521 94 0.50% 73517 (185) (1.35)% 13901 229 1.87%
Pij 3E:13A 13317 178 1.34% 13319 (142) (1.44)% 13505 78 0.10% 13449 (253) (7.65)% 13787 715 0.84%
P'3E.BA 13298 783 7'.24% 13318 (103) (1i89)% 13562 135 (0.33)%. 13488 (216) (7.58)% 13836 164 120%
PrJ12-13 Pege 11
Odobe�2072
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS-October 2072
TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS
5 BY GRADE�GROUP(Cootlnued)
Total = OIXOber 1 Actual Count AND Projectetl Counts Prj 3.13- 73 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average Kdg Inaease
DiH = Number Projeclion is undeq-)or over AcWal Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY B Usirg Average Kdg Increase
% = Percent Piojection is urMer(-)or over Adual Prj 3.73A 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cry BiM Rates
Prj 3.BA- 6 YEAR HISTORY R King Cty Birih Rates
Gredes 2005-OB 200&07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-70
K-5 7otal Dift % Total DIH % Total Dift % 7otal Diff % Total Diff %
ACTUAL 5887 �pa �oa 6033 wa �ooc 6142 noc �oa 6798 �oac �ooc 8759 �oa �ooc
P�3E.13 5750 (13� (2:33)% 5871 (162) (2.69)% 8085 (5� (0.93)°/u 6179 (19) (0.31)% 8254 95 1.54%
P�j 3E.8 5795 (92) (1.58)% 5921 (112) (1.86)% 8138 (4) (0.07)% 6237 39 0.83% 6294 735 2.19%
P�3E.13A 5750 (737) (2.33)% 5869 (781) (2.72)% 6059 (83) (1.35)% 6129 (69) (7.11)% 8237 7B 127%
P'3E.BA 5784 103 (1:75)% 5912 (127 (2.01)% 8094 (48) (0.78)% 8172 (26) (0.42)% 6284 105 1.70%
Grades 200506 2008-07 2003-04 200&09 2009-10
6-8 Total �it( % Total Diff % Total DiN % Total OiN % Total Diff %
ACTUAL 3169 7oot laa 3144 7oot mc 3097 7pz x�oc 3206 x�c mc 3196 �ooc x�oc
P�3E.13 3132 (3� (1.17)% 3731 (13) (0.41)% 3107 10 0.32% 3779 (27) (0.84)% 3242 46 7.44%
P�3E.6 3137 (32) (1.07)°b 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 (it) (0.34)% 3243 47 1.47%
P�3E.13A 3132 (3� (1.17)% 3131 (13) (0.47)% 3107 10 0.32% 3179 (27) (0.84)% 3242 46 7.M%
P'3E.BA 3137 (32) (1.01)% 3146 2 0.06% 3776 19 0.61% 3195 (11) (0.34% 3243 47 1.47%
Grades 200506 2006-07 2003-04 2008-09 2009-10
8-12 Total Dilt %� Total DiH % 7otal Diff °k Total Diff % Total Diff %
ACTUAL 5032 na ubt� 5241 �ax loot 5320 xxlt laz 5299 �ooc xla 5234 ltpc laz
P�f 3E.13 4898 (134) (2.66)% 5085 (156) (2.98)°.6 5190 (130) (2.44)% 5129 (170) (321)°h� 5074 (160) (3.06)%
Prj 3E.8 4880 (152) (3.02)% 5088 (155) (2.96)% 5192 (728) (2.41)96 5155 (744) (2:72)% 5128 (108) (2.03)%
Prj 3E.13A 4898 (734) (2.88)% 5085 (758) (2.98)% 5190 (130) (2.44)%� 5129 (170) (3.21)%� 5074 (180) (3.08)%
P 3E.6A 4880 (152) (3.02)% 5088 (155) (2.98)% 5192 (72B) (2.'41)% 5755 (144) (2.72)% 5729 (105) (2.01)%
ai zoos-os zoos-o� zoo3-aa zaoe-0s zoo��o
Grades Total DIH % TMaI DiB % Totel DiH % Total Dift �% Total DiH %
ACTUAL 74088 �oot �aoc 14418 �cz x�oc 73672 �ooc iooc 74703 �ooc boc 14589 �ooc bcx
Pf�3E.73 13780 (308) (2.19)% 13499 (173) (1:27)% 74382 710 5.19% � 14487 (276) (1.4'n%� 14570 (79) (0:13)%
P�3E.8 13812 _(276) (1.96)% 13542 (130) (0.95)% 14448 774 5.66% 14587 (HB) (OJB)°h� 14665 76 0.5296
Prj3E.13A 13780 (308) (2.19)% 13447 (225) (1.65)% 14356 684 5.00°k ' 14437 (286) (1.87)% 14553 (36) (0.25)%
P� 3E.6A 13801 (287) 2.04)% 13510 162) (1.18)% 14402 730 5.34% 14522 (181) (723% 74838 47� 0.32%
P�1a..z Pane 72 October 2012
�
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICTSTUDENT. OLLMENT PROUECTIONS-October 2012
TABLE BROJECTION COMPARISONS
5 BY GRADE GROUP(Contlnued)
Total = Odober 7 Actual Count AND Projected Counis Prj 3.13- 73 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase
Diff = Number Projeclion Is undery-)or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Usirg Average Kdg Increase
% = Percent Projectlon is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Bihh Rates
Prj 3.BA- 8 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty BiAh Rates
Gtades 2010.11 20N-12 2012-13 �Average Average Historical Data Is grauped by
K-5 Total Diff % Total DiH % Tofal DiB % Difl % K-5,68,372 articulation
ACTUAL 8208 �ooc �ooc 6230 �oa �aa 6489 na mc �ooc poc pattem.
Prj 3E.13 6282 74 iJ9% 6275 45 0.72% 6372 (71� (1�.80)% (45) (0.46)%
Prj 3E.8 6323 715 1.85°% 6267 37 0.59% 8368 (121) (7.86)% (34) (020)% Articulation petlem has no
Prj 3E.13A 6252 44 0.71% 6266 36 0.58% 6346 (143) (220)% (52) (1.01)% numeric impact on efficacy
P�3E.6A 8289 61 0.88% 6260 30 0.48% 6339 (150) (2.31)°� (33) (0.73)°,4 ai projedion models.
Grades 201411 2071-12 2012-13 - Average Average
6-8 Total OiR % Total DiB % Total DiH % Diff� �%
ACTUAL 3213 -x�c �ooc 3147 wa na 31M na 7wc� mc xpc
P�3E:13 3234 21 0.65% 3221 80 2.55% 3143 (7) (0.03)% (0) (1.05)°k
P�3E.6 3236 23 0.72% 3271 70 223% 3132 (72) (0.38)% 3 (0:74)%
P�3E.13A 3234 21 0.65% 3221 80 2.55% 3143 (1) (0.03)% (0) (1.05)%�
P�3E.BA 3236 23 0.72% 3211 70 223% 3132 (12) (0.38)% 3 (0.74)°.6�
Grades 2070.71 2011-12 2012-13 Averege Average
9-12 Total DiR % Total Difl % 7olal Di% % Diff % �
ACTUAL 5061 �ooc mc 4992 �aoc �ooc 4963 �ooc na �ooc �ooc
P�3E.13 4921 (140) (2.7�% 4907 (91) (1.82)% 4613 (150) (3.02)% (63) (0.7�%
P�3E.6 5027 (34) (0.87)% 5017 25 0.50% 4906 (5� (7.75)% (37) (O.6n%
Prj 3E.73A 4927 (140) (2.7�% 4901 (91) (1.62)°,6 4813 (150) (3A2)% (63) (077)%
P�j 3E.6A 5027 (34) (0.6�% 5017 25 0.50% 4908 (57) (1.15)% (3� (0.66)%
AIl 2010.11 �2077-72 2012-73 Ave�ege �Average
Giades 7olal Dift % ToWI Difl % Total Dlfl % Oitt %
ACTUAL 74482 ncz mc 14363 �oot� �oa �14596 mc - � x�ot� bot ' noc
P�j 3E.73 1M37 (45) (0.31)% 74397 �34� 024°h 14328 (288) (1.84)% (2� (0.04)% �
Prj3E.6 14588 169� 0:72% 74495 132 0.92% 14406 (190) (1.30)% 21 �' 0.72%
Prj3E.13A 14407 (75) (0.52)% 14388 �25� 0.77% 14302 (294) �(2.01)% (40) � (029)%. �
Prj3E.6A 14532 50 0.35% 14488 125 0.87% 14377 (279) '(7�.50)% 18 ' ,(0.08)%I ��
P712-13 Page�13 October 2012
Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
Enrollment Projections
�,� �
Buildout Data for Enroll Projedions;March 2013
BASE DATA-BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Studenf OeneratiodFactors
ASSUMPTIONS: Aubum Factors Single Muw-
1 Uses BuOd Out est/metes received fiom developers. 2013 SF 2012 MF Family Family
2 Sfudent Generadon Factors ere updated qubum data'for Y013 as allowed per King County Ordlnance Elementary 0.2270 0.1720
3 Takes area la6e/ed Leke/end and Keney ProJects projects acro§s 20f3-2919 Middle School 0.0850 0.0700
4 Takes area la6e/ed Bridpes and od�er Lea Hpl area developments and proJects across 2013-Y019 Senior High 0.1290 0.0900
5 lncfudes known developments!n N.Aubum end otber nan-Lea Hlll and non-Lakeland developments Total 0.4410 0.3320
Table Aubum School O(s
1 Develo ment 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Total
Lakeland/Kersey Single Family 100 125 125 125 125 150 750
Lea Hill Area Single Family 100 700 125 175 50 50 50 650
Other Sin le Famil Units 50 75 100 100 100 75 75 575
Total Sin le Famil Units 250 300 350 400 275 275 125 1975
Pro eded Pu ils:
Elementary Pupils K-5 57 68 79 91 82 62 28 448
�Mid�SchoofPupils�, 8-8 21 26 30 34 23 23 11 168
Sc.Highpupils 9-12 32 39 45 52 3B 35 18 255
Total K-12 110 132 154 176 121 121 55 87f
Muw Fami Units 25 75 75 75 50 0 0 300
Total Muld Family Units 25 75 75 75 50 0 0 300
Pro'eded Pupils:
Elementary Pupils K-5 4 13 13 13 9 0 0 52
Mid School Pupils 6-B �2 5 5 -5 4 0 0 21
Si. High Pupils 9-12 2 7 7 7 5 0 0 27
Total K-12 8 25 25 25 17 0 0 100
Total Housin Units 275 375 425 475 325 275 125 2275
Elemenfary Pupils K-5 61 81 92 104 71 62 28 500
Mid School Pupils 6-8 23 31 35 39 27 23 11 189
Sr. High Pupils 9-12 35 45 �52 56 40 35 16 282
Total K-12 119 157 179 201 138 121 55 971
Cum6ladve�F'roecGon 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2018-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20-
Elementary-GradesKS 61� 192 :234 338 409 � 472 � - 500 �
Mid�School-Grades 6-.8 23 54 �89 128 155 178 189
Senior High-Grades 9-12 ;35 80� 132 190 230 266 282
Totel 119 276 455 656 I 794 915 977
45
Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-March 2013
TABCE , New ProJects•.Annual New Puplls Added 8 DlsMbuled
2 b Grede Cevel
6 Year Percent of averege
GRADE Average PupilsbyGrade 2012-13 2013-14 201415 201516 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 201&20
Enroll. &Level
KDG 1027 7�.06% t098 8 19 32 46 56 65 69�
1 1044 7.18% 1089 �9 20 33 47 57 68 70
2 1040 7.14% 42.87% 7083 B 20 33 47 57 65 69
3 7026 7.05% 1111 8 19 32 46 58 85 68
4 1043 7.17% 1038 8 20 33 47 57 66 70
5 1057 7.27% 1070 9 20 33 4B 58 87 71
6 1048 7.2096 7041 �9 20 33 47 57 66 70
7 1066 7.32% 21.76% 1086 9 20 33 48 58 67 77
8 1053 7.23% 7017 9 20 33 47 57 66 70
9 1255 8.83% 1200 10 24 39 57 69 79 84
10 1279 8.79% 35.38% 1278 10 � 24 40 58 70 . 80 85 .
� - 11 1277 8.78°k 1184 10 24 40 58 70 �80 85
12 1334 9.17% 1321 11 25 42 60 73 84 89
Totals 14549 700.00% Tolal 14596 179 278 455 856 794 915 971
TABLE 8 year Historical Data
3 Average Enroliment a�d Percenta e Distributed b Grade Level
Grade oZ-oa oe-os oato �aii t�-tz 72-�s 6 rAve �o
KDG 998 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1027.17 7.08%
1 995 1015 1D33 1086 1068 1089 1044.33 7.18%
2 1019 1024 998 7016 1097 1063 1039.50 7.14%
3 997 1048� 993 1013 996 1111 1026.33 7.05°h
4 1057 � 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 �7043.00 7:17%
5 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1057.33 727%
6 1007 1096 1040 1041 1�3 1041 7048.00 7.20%
7 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1088 1085.67 7.32%
8 1033 1078 1031 1112 1046 1017 1052.50 . 723%
9 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200, 1255.17 8.63%
10 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1278.87 8.79%
11, 1352 7350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1276.67 8.78°h
12 1263 1352 1410 1344 7316 1321 1334.33 9.17%
Totals 14559 14703 14589 14482 14383 14596 14548.67 100.00%
. %ofcharge � 0.99% -0:78% � -0A3% -D.82% 7.82%
change+I- 144 (174 107) (119) 233 �
Buildout Data forEnrolf Projedions-Meroh 2013
�TABLE4 New Projects-Pupil Projection'Cumulative
ND'3.13 b .Grade Level U dated March 2013
(/ses.a.cohortsurvlval' - - �GRADE 2012-13`- 2013=14 � 2014-75- ���2075-78 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019�-20
modeFassumfng�100%of �Actual Pro'ected Ipro'eded 'Pro'ected� Pro'ected �Proected Pro'ected Pro'ected
pl'BVlousyearnew KDG 1096� - �-1122 1148 1177 1206 �1232 1256 1275
enrolleesmoVe to (he nexf 1 1089 1158 1184 1213 1243 1268 1292 1312
grade level. 2 1083 1110 1181 7209 7239 1264 1289 1308
3 1111 1105 1135 1207 1237 1262 1286 1306
Kindergarten calculates 4 1038 1147 1144 1175 1250 1275 1299 1319
previous years numberplus 5 1070 1os8 1t80 117s 1212 1282 1308 1326
K-5 8489 6709 8972 7160 7386 7583 7728 7845
Currentgeneration based on 6 1041 1089 1090 1203 1203 1231 1300 1320
%oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1086 1063 1113 1116 1231 1227 1254 1319
factoruses 100%cohort 8 1017 1104 1084 1136 1140 1250 1245 1267
survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3144 3256 3287 3455 3574 3709 3799 3905
history. 9 1200 1306 1398 1381 1438 1439 1550 1541
10 1278 1143 1252 1346 1332 1383 1384 1489
11 1164 1213 1081 7192 1288 1269 1318 1313
12 1321 1153 1206 1077 1191 1282 1262 1306
GR 9-12 4983 4815� 4937 4997 5249 5373 ' 5513 5648
Total 14598 - 14780 15196 15612 - 16210� 16665 17041 17398-
%ofchange 1.28%� 2.82% � �. 2:73% 3:83% -2.81%� 2.26% 2.09%
chan e+l- 184 418 � 475 599.- 455 376 357
TABLE 5 New Projects-Pupil Projection Cumulalive
ND 3.6 b Grede Level U ated March 2013
USBS'a-'cohOrtsuNlval' GRADE 2072-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 201&17 2077-18 201&19 201&20
mode/assuming 100%of Aqual Pro'ected Pro'ected Projected Pro ected Projected Pro'ected Projected
prevlous year new KDG 1098 1127 1158 7191 1226 1256 1285 1309
enrol/ees move to the next 1 1089 1150 1182 1215 1250 1280 1309 1333
giade level. 2 1083 1105 1169 1202 1237 1267 1296 1327
3 1111 1092 1117 1182 1216 1246 1275 1300
Kindergarten calculates 4 1038 1149 1133 1160 1227 1257 1288 1310
previous years numberplus 5 1070 1059 1174 1159 1188 1250 1279 t304
K-5 6489 6682 6932 7109 7343. 7557 7731 7877
Curcentgeneration based on 6 1041 1087 1073 1789 1176 1200 7261 1285
%oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1086 1065 1108 7101 1219 1202 1224 1281
factoruses 100%cohort 8 1017 1093 1075� 1119 1114 1227 1208 1226
Survival, based on 6 yeaf GR 6-8 3144 . 3239 3255 � 3410 3509 3628 3694 �3792�
history. 9 1200 1221 1302 1287 1336 1329 1442 1419
10 1278 1205 1230 1313 1301 1344 1336 1443
71 1164 � 1266 1197 1223 1308 1290 1333 13'18
12 1321, � 7206 1372 1248 1275 1355 1336 1373
GR 9-12 4983 4898 5041 � 5069 �� �5220 5379 5447 5554
� Tofal 19598 ' 19820 1522& �15588 ' 18072 76504 16871 17223
. �%ofchange� '. 1.53%� 2.78% - �2.3846: ! 3N1% 2.68% . 223% 2.08%
chan e+/-. � 224 409 359 485 431 387 352
47
Buildout Data for Enrallment Projections-March 2013
TABLE 6 New Developments•Pupil ProJeclion Cumulative
ND3.i3A b Grade Level Updated March 2013
Uses a 'cohoK�surv(val' GRADE 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2018-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
model assuming 100%;of Adual Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro ected Pro ected Pro'ected Pro'ected
prevlous year new KDG 1098 1106 1136 1149 1145
enrollees move to the next 1 7089 1158 1169 1201 1215 1207
grade level. 2 1083 1110 1181 1194 1227 1237 1228
3 1111 1105 1135 1207 7221 1250 1259 1245
Kindergarten calculates 4 1038 1147 1144 1175 1250 1259 1287 1291
birth rate.average plus 5 7070 1068 7180 1179 1212 1282 1291 1314
6489 6694 6945 7105 7271 6236 5085 3850
CurrenTgeneration based on 6 1041 1089 1090 1203 1203 1231 1300 1304
% oftotalenrollment. Olher 7 1088 1063 1173 1118 1231 1227 1254 1319
factoruses 100%cohort 8 1017 7104 1084 1736 1140 1250 1245 1267
survival, based on 6 year 3144 3258 3287 3455 3574 3709 3799 3890
history. 9 1200 1306 1398 1381 1438 7439 1550 1541
10 1278 1143 1252 1346 1332 1383 1384 1489
11 1764 1273 1081 1192 1288 1269 1318 1313
12 1321 7153 1206 1077 1791 1282 1262 1306 .
� 4963 4815 4937 4997 5249 5373 5513 5648
Total 14596 14784 15169 15557 16094
%otcharge 7:75°b 2.74% 2.56% 3.48%
change+l- 768 404 388 538
TABLE 7 New Projects-Pupil Projectlon CumulaUve
ND 3.eA b Grode Level U dated March 2013
Uses�.a�'coho►tsurvlval' GRADE� 2012-13 201314 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20
mollel assuming�100�of Actual Proected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Fro'eded Pra'ected Projected
prevlous year new KDG 1098 1106 1136 1149 1145
enroUees move to the next 1 1089 1150 1161 1193 1208 1200
giade level. 2 1083 1105 1169 1182 1275 1225 1216
3 1111 1092 1117 1182 1196 1225 1233 7279
KindergaAen calculates 4 1038 1149 1133 1160 7227 1?37 1264 1268
birth rate average plus 5 1070 1059 1174 1159 7186 1250 1259 1282
8489 6662 '6890 7025 7179
CuRenigenerffiion based on 6 1041 1081 1073� 1789 1176 1200 1281 -1265 .
� °/a:oftotalenrollment. .Other 7 loas 1os5 1108 1to1 i2i9 1202 i224 128i
factoruses 100%cohort 8 1017 1093 1075 1119 1114 122Y 1208 1226
survival, based on 6.year 3144 3239 �3255 3410 �� - 3509 3628� 3694 3772
history. 9 1200 7221 7302 1287 1336 1329 1442 1419
10 . 1278 1205 1230 1313 1301 1344 1336 1443
11 t164 1266 1197 1223 1308 1290 1333 7318
12 1321 7206 1312 1248 1275 1355 1338 1373
4963 4898 5041 5069 5220 5319 5447 5554
Total 14596 19799 15186 15503 75908
%ofcharge 1:39% 2.8 2.09% 2.81%
' � change+l- . -- .
Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey
,' �; ,
�
Aubum School District
Development Growlh since 1!1/07
SINGLE FAMILY March,zo�a
� � - � ��� � � Actual Sludents Projected Students
fi S - � Uff@0 - O" @ - Sludent Generation Fadors
Develo ment Name Parcels Occu anc Occu fed Elem Middle HS Total em e_ o a
As n Meadows 21 21 0 S 2 7 17 0.381 0.095 0.333 0.810
Beaver Meadows 60 48 12 6 __ 4 10 20 0.125 0:083 0208 A.417
Brandon Meadows 55 13 42 2 0 1 3 0.154 0.000 0.077 0231
Brid� s 386 20 . . .368 2 2 1 5 0.100 0.100 0.050 0.250
Carrin ton Pointe 24 24 0 5 2 1 8 0208 0.083 0.042 0.333
Greenacres 16 16 0 ' 2 0 1 3 0.125 0.000 0:063 0:188
Kendall Rid e 106 21 85 ' 2 0 0 2 0.095 0.000 0.000 0.095
Lakeland East: Portola 130 69 61 15 6 8 29 0.217 0.087 0.116 0:420
Lakeland: Ed eview 373 87 288 6 2 2 10 0.069 0.023 0.023 0:115
Lakeland: Pinnade Estates 76 45 31 26 11 4 41 0.578 0.244 0.089 0.911
Lakeland:The Reserve 80 80 0 24 15 15 54 0.300 0.188 0.188 0.675
Lakeland:Vista Hei hts 125 720 5 32 12 14 58 0.267 0.100 0.717 0.483
Montere Park 239 713 126 7 3 3 13 0.062 0.027 0.027 0.115
Pacifc�ew-Meadows 78 78 0 23 7 15 45 0.295 0.090 0.192 0.577
Sterlin Court 8 8 0 2 2 2 6 0250 0.250 0.250 0.750
Trail Run 169 169 0 36 14 21 71 0.213 0.083 0.124 0.420
Vnta e Place 25 17 8 7 0 _ 5 12 0.412 0.000 0.294 0.706
Totals 197.1 949 7022 205 82 110 397 0.227 0.086 0.728 0.441
Current Construction to pe Occupied 2013 estimated Students sased on student�en Factor
Actual Students Pro'eded Stutlents
UIIIt3/- CUfreOt ToBB � Student Generation Factors
Development Name Parcels Occu anc Occupied Elem Middle HS Totat E em Midd e H Total
Beaver Meadows 60 48 12 6 4 10 20 3 1 2 5
Brandon Meadows 55 13 42 2 0 1 3 10 4 5 19
Brid es 386 20 366 2 2 1 5 83 31 47 161
Kendall Rid e 106 21 85 2 0 0 2 19 7 11 37
LakelandEast: Portola 130 69 61 15 6 8 29 , 14 5 8 27
Lakeland: Ed eview 373 87 286 6 2 2 10 85 24 37 126
Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 _ 45 31 26 11 4 41 ', 7 3 4 14
' Cakeland:Vste Hei hts 125 120 5 32 12 14 58 1 0 1 2
Montere Park 239 113 126 7 3 3 13 � 29 11 16 56
Vinta e Place 25 17 8 7 0 5 12 2 1 1 4
' Totals' 1575 553 1022 105 40 48 193 • 231 67 132 451
- - . -�- ..013
Auburn : �ol District
�- ' �Development Growth since 1/1/07 �
2073:and u March,2ot3
. p� Estimated SWdenls Based on Stutlent Gen Factor
Projected Studeota
Units/ Current TaBe Student Generetion Factors
Development Name Parcels Occu anc Occu ied Elem Mlddle HS Total
Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 7 3 4 14
Anderson Acres 14 0 14 3 1 2 6
Backbone Rid e 7 0 7 2 1 1 3
Brandon Place 78 0 78 18 7 10 34
Bridle Estates 18 0 18 4 2 2 8
Cam-West 99 0 99 22 8 13 44
Estes Park 31 0 31 7 3 4 14
Har reet Kan 8 0 8 2 1 1 4
Hazel Hei hts 22 0 22 5 2 3 10
Hazel View 20 0 20 5 2 3 9
Lakeland East:Villas 81 0 81 18 7 10 36
Lakeland: Fo�est Glen At.. 30 0 30 7 3 4 13
Lakeland`. Park Rid e 258 0 256 58 22 33 113
Lawson`Place 14 0 14 3 1 2 6
Me an's`Meadows 9 0 9 2 1 1 4
Mountain View Estates 37 0 37 8 3 5 16
New Ho e'Lutheran Plat 8 0 8 2 ' 1 1 4
Pacific Lane. 11 0 11 2 1 1 5
Rid e At Tall Tim6ers 104 0 104 24 9 13 46
S encerPlace 13 0 13 3 1 2 6
Sti s Plat 29 0 29 7 2 4 13
WillowPlace 18 0 18 4 2 2 8
Yates Blat 16 0 16 4 1 2 7
954 954 Totals 2013and up 216 82 123 427
Grand Totals 448 169 255 871
51
Auburn School District
Development Growth since 1/1I07
March,2013
MULTI FAMILY
UIIItS/ Cu►fBllt To Be Student Generation Factors
DevelopmenfName Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total
Butte Estates 29 29 0 8 5 5 18 0:276 0:172 0.172 0.621
Lakeland: Four Lakes A ts 234 219 15 14 4 2 20 0.064 _ 0.018 0:009 0.091
6akeland: Madera 70 70 0 2 0 1 3 0.029 0.000 0.014 0.043
Legend Townhomes 11 11 0 3 2 4 9 0.273 0.182 0.364 _ 0.818
Pacific Ave Du lexes 12 12 0 5 1 7 7 0:417 0.083 0.083 0.583
Seasons at Lea Hill Village 332 332 0 123 42 48 213 A:370 0:127 0.145 0.642
Trail Run Townhomes 115 112 3 15 9 3 27 0.134 0.080 0:027 0241
1207 785 15 188 76 98 362 0223 0.095 0:116 0.434
Lakeland: Four Lakes Apts 234 219 15 14 4 2 20 3 2 2 8
Trail Run Townhomes 115 112 3 15 9 3 27 1 0 0 2
Total 4 3 3 10
2073 and beyond
Auburn Hills A tlTH 205 0 205 46 19 24 89
"D" Street Plat 32 0 32 7 3 4 14
Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 11 5 6 21
285 285 Total 64 27 33 124
Grend Total 68 30 36 133
4/9/2013
�� � �� � �
SCHOOL DISTRICT
�� � ENGAGE • EDUCATE • EMPOWER �
June'2_l,2013
JeffTate �"` '�" '�` '%"" q i:�"�
Planning and Development Director � �` ` '"� ` �"' g ��`"� �
CityofAubum j�� ;�,� )��,{
25 West Main Sh•eet
Auburn, WA 98001 Ci I r CF AU�URN
PLAhNIR�G R facVEi_CPMENT
Dear Mr. Tate,
Enclosed you will find a copy of the Auburn School District Capital Pacilities Plan for2013
through 2019. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the AuUuin Scliool District Board of
Directors oi� May 28, 20]3, in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of
Washington.
Included in the Plan are the following:
❑ Sia-Year Enroliment Projections
❑ Aubm•n School District Standard of Service
o The DistricYs overall capacity of the 6-year period
❑ An inventory of existing facilities
', o Impact Fee Computations
a District Capital Construction Plan
Tlie Aubuin School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be ado�ted by reference as
pai�t of the capitai facilities element of the City of Au6urn's Comprehensive Plan and that thc
school impact fees be set in accordanc8 with the plam for the 2014 fiscal year.
The Auburn School District is also requestinga chuige in t!re fees for 2014. The calculated fee
for single-family is $5,398.93, a decrease of$112:76; and the calculated fee for multi-family is
$3,387.84, an increase of$7.58.
Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for yonr assistance.
Sincerely
�
chael N t
eputy S pe ' tendent
usiness n perations
Copy to:
Kip Herren, Superintendent,Auburn School Disuict w10 enclosure
Denise Stiffarm,K&L GATCS LLP w/o enclosw•e
Jeff Grose,Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure
James P.Fugate Administralion Building �915 Fourth Street NE•Auburn,WA 98002,4499•253-931-4930
, DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period
Description of Proposal:
This thresflold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the
following acrions, which aze so closely related to each other that they aze in effect a single course
of action: �
1. The adoption of the Auburn School DistricYs 2013-2019 Capital Facilities Plan by
the Aubum School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the
District; and
2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the ciries of
Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn SchooI DishicYs 2013-2019 Capital Facilities Plan a§
part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of
Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to inclnde the
Auburn School DistricYs Capital Facilifies Plan as part of the Capital Faciliries Element of each
jurisdiction's ComprehensivePlan.
Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408
Locarion of the Proposal:
The Auburn School District includes an azea of approximately 57 square miles. The
Cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King
County fall witliin the District'sboundaries.
Lead Agency:
Auburn School District No. 408
The lead agency for this proposal has determiiied that the proposal does not have a
probable significant adverse environmental 'unpact on the environxnent. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made
after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request.
�
THis Determinarion of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The
lead agency will not act on tHis proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be �
submitted by 4:00 p.m., May 28, 2013. The responsible official will reconsider tfie DNS b.ased
on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if,significant adverse impacts aze likely,
withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expirarion of the comment
deadline.
Responsible Official: Mike Newman
Deputy Superintendent,Business and Operadons
Aubum School District No. 408
Telephone: (253) 931-4900
Address: Auburn School District
9154�' Street N.E.
Aubiirn, WA 98002
You may appeal tliis deterniinarion in writing by 4:00 p.m., May 28, 2013, to
IvLike Newinan, Deputy Superintendent, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4� Street N.E.,
Auburn, WA 98002.
Date of Issue: May 7, 2013
Date Published; May 7, 2013 i
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
i
WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist.
Purpose ofiChecklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires alt
governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before
making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all
proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.
The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency
identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impactsfrom the proposal, if
it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
?his environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information abouf
your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whe4her the
environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS.
Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
� �
You must answer each quesfion accurately and carefully, to the best of your
knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from yourown
observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know
the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or
"does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline,
and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems;
the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do
them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional
information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The
agency to which you submit this check�ist may ask you to explain your answers or
provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be
significant adverse impact.
`
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
1
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be
answered "does not apply". In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non-
project acfions (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project,"
"applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and
"affectecl geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, ff applicable:
The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2013 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital
Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the DistricYs facilities needs. The ciries
of Auburn and Kent and the King County Comprehensive Plans will be amended to
include the Auburn School District 2013 Capital Faciliries Plan in the Capital Faciliti8s
Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Black
Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn
School District 2013 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilihes Element of each
�urisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan is
available for review in the District's offices. i
2. Name of applicant:
Auburn School District No. 408.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Auburn School District No. 408
915 4`� St. N.E.
Auburn, WA 98002
Contact Person: Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Business/Operations
Telephone: (253) 931-4900
4. Date checklist prepared: April 16, 2013
2
5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408.
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
The Capital Faciliries Plan is scheduled Yo be adopted by the District on May 28, 2013.
After adoprion, the District will forwazd the Capital Faciliries Plan to the ciries of
Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond; Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in
each,jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated
annually. Site-specific projects will be suliject to project-level environmental review.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity
related to orconnected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects thaY the District
plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to purchase property for
and construct a new elementary school and a new middle school over the next six years to
meet projected student population increases.: The District may also add portable facilities
at existing school sites. The District will also conduct facility improvements at existing
school sites throughout the Distriot and moderriize Auburn High School.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been
prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
i
The projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have undergone or will undergo
additional environmental review, when appropriate; as they are developed..
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental
approvals of other proposals directly affecting'the property covered by your proposal2 If
yes, explain.
None known.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your
proposal, if known.
The cities of Aubum and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Faciliries Plan for the
purposes of updafing the ciries' school impact fees and incorporating the updated Plan as
a part of the Capital Facilities Elements ofboth the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive
Plans. King County will review thePlan for the purposes of implementing the County's
nnpact fee ordinance and incorporaring the Plan as a part of the Capital Facili6es Element
of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The ci6es of Algona, Black Diamond, and
Pacific Comprehensive Plans magbe amended to include the Auburn School District
2013 Capital Faciliries Plan in the Capital Faciliries Element of each jurisdiction's
3
Comprehensive Plan and each jurisdiction may adopt a school impact fee ordinance to
implement school impact fees. ! !
11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed
uses and tlie size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this
checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal: You do not need to
repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include
additional specifc information on project description.)
This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School
District's 2013 Capita] Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the Disirict's facilities
needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the ciries of Aubum and Kent
Comprehensive Plans and the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Aubum
School District 2013 Capital Faciliries Plan as a part of each jurisdicrion's Capital
Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. The ciries of Algona, Black Diamond,
and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amendedto include the Auliurci School District
2013 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's
Comprehensive Plan and each jurisdiction may adopt a school impact fee ordinance to
implement school impact fees.
12. Location of the proposal. Give su�cient information for a person to
understand the precise location of your proposed projecf, including a street address if �
any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range
of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site
plan, vicinity map; and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should
submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or
detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
The 2013 Capital Faciliries Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The Dishict
includes an area of approxunately 57 squaze miles. The cities of Aubum, Algona, Black
Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the
DistricPs boundaries.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
The Aubum School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and
gradients. 5pecific topogaphic characteristics of the sitea at which the piojects
4
included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be idenrified
I � during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Specific slope chazacteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental
review.
c. What general types of soiis•are found on the site (for example, clay, sand,
gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural sbils, specify
them and note any prime farmland.
Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate
vicinity? If so, describe.
� 7 Unstable soils may exist within the Aubnm School District. Specifiasoil limitations
on individual project sites have been orwill be idenrified at the time of project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or
grading proposed. Indicate soucce of fiil.
Individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be subject,
when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time
of proposal. Proposed gading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quanrity, and
source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so,
generally describe.
It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currenUy
proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan: The erosion impacts of the individual projects
have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of pro�ect-level
environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be
subject to local approval processes.
5
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces
after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?)
The construction projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have required orwill
require the construction of impervious surfaces. THe extent of any impervious cover
constructed will vary with each pmject included in the Capital Facilities Plan. Ttiis
issue has been or will be addressed during pmject-level enviionmental review when.
appropriate.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the
earth, if any:
The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and
appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed duririg project-level
environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control
requiremeats have beea or will be met.
2. Air
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e.,
dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when i i
the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate
quantities if known.
Various emissions, many construcrion-related, may result from the individual projects
included in the Capital Faciliries Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have
been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
Please see theSupplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your
proposal? If so, generally describe.
Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects
included in the Capita] Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-
level environmental review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air;
if any:
The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be
subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval pmcesses ; ;
6
when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all
' i applicable air regularions and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to
the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be
addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the
Supplementa] Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
3. Water
a. Surface:
1) Is there any surface water bodyon or in the immediate vicinity of
the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes,
ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If
appropriate, state what stream orriver it flows into.
There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District.
The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during
pmject-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the
surface water regimes and flow pattems have been or will be reseazched and
incorponted into the designs of the individual projects.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200
feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available
plans.
The pmjecu included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the
surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local
approval requirements have been or will be sarisfied.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be
placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and intlicate the area
of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material
as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or
will be provided during project-leyel environmental review when appropriate.
Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied.
7
4) Will the proposal require surface waterwithdrawals ordiversions?
Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities''rf known. �_
Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the
projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note
location on the site plan.
Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area,
has been or willbe required to meet applicablelocal regulations for flood areas.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to
surFace waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume
of discharge.
Specific information regarding the dischazge of waste materials that may be
required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan has been
or will be provided during project-level enviionmental review when appropriate.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
b. Ground:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or w'ill. water be discharged to
groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate
quarrtities if known.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan inay impact
goundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed
during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each pmject has
been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the
Supplemenfal Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the grnund
from septic tanks or othersources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage;
industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.).
Describe t_he general size of the system, the number of such systems, the
number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or
humansthe system(s) are expected to serve.
8
The dischazges of waste material that may take place in connecrion with the
I ! projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during pcoject=level
environmental review.
c. Water Runoff(including storm water):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of
collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). VVhere will
this water flow? Will thiswater flow into other waters? Ifiso, describe.
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater
runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of
each project has been or will be provided during project-level endironmental
review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable
local stormwater regulations.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so,
generally describe.
The projects 3ncluded in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of '
waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specifia impacts of each
I � project on ground and surFace waters have been or will be identified dut'tng
- project-level environxnental review when appropriate. Each project has been or
will be subject to all applicable regularions regarding the discharge of waste
materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for
Nonproject Actions.
d. Proposed measuresto reduce or control surFace, ground, and runoff water
impacts, ifany:
Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during
project-leve] environxnental review when appropriate.
9
4. Plants:
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
_ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
_ shrubs
_ grass
_ pasture
_ crop or grain
_ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
_ water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
_ other types of vegetation
A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District.
Inventories of the vegetarion located on the sites of the projects proposed in the
Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be developed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
Some of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan may require the removal or
alterarion of vegetarion. The specific impacts on vegetation of tfie projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level
environmental review when appropriate:
c. List threatened or endangered species known to lie on or near the site.
The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the
Capital Facili6es Plan have been or will be detettnined duriug project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve
or enhance vegetstion on the site, if any:
Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites ofthe projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be iclentified during project-level
environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to
applicable local landscaping requirements.
10
5. Animals:
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the
site or are known to be on or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other.
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, o#her:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shelffish, other.
An inventory of species that have been observed on or neaz the sites of the projects
proposed in the Capital Faciliries Plan has been or will be developed duringpro�ect-
level environmental review when appmpriate.
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the
site.
Inventories of threatened'or endangered species known to be on or neaz the sites of the
projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during
project-level environmental review when appropriate.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
i i
The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes
have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Appropriate measures to preseive or enhance wiidlife have been or will be determined
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
6. Energy and Natural Resources:
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be
used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it will
be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
The State Board of Education requires the cbmpletion of a life-cycle cost analysis of
all heating, lighting, and insularion systems before it will permit specific school
projects to pmceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be detercnined at the rime of specific engineering and site
11
design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject
Actions.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent
properties? If so, generally describe:
The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan on the solaz
potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during pmject-level
environmental review when appropriate.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of
this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy
impacts; if any:
' Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be cbnsidered during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
7. Environmental Health:
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic i �
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste; that could
occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health
hazards, if any:
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan complyor will comply with all
current codes; standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or
will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the
time they are developed, when appropriate.
�
12
b. Noise:
' 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project
(for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and
industrial azeas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise
sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when
appropriate.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by orassociated
with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (forexample: traffic,
construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would cbme
from the site.
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal
construcrion noises that will exist on short-term bases only. The construction.
projects could increase traffc around the constructionsites on a short-term basis.
Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity
of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in
traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similazly; the
placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school faciliries
'. and may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise.
Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the
Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
The projected noise unpacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan
haue been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental
review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local
regulations.
8. Land and Shoreline Use:
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
There aze a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including
residenrial, commercial, industdal,institurional, utility, open space, recreational, eta '
13
b. Hasthe site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not been
used recently for agricultnre.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
The stnictures located on the sites for the projects inclnded in the Capital Facilities
Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level enviionmental ,
review when appropriate.
d. Will any sfructures be demolished? If so, what?
The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be idenrified during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
e: What isthe current zoning classification of the site?
The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have.a variety of zoning
classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has ( i
been or will be idenfified during project-level environmenta7 review when appropriate:
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Inventories of the comprehensive plan designarions for the sites of the projects
included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been orwill be completed during project-
level environmental review when appropriate.
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of
the site?
Shoreline master program designarions of the sites of the projects included in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during pmject-level
environmental review when appropriate.
14
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive"
area? If so, speciy. -
Any enviro�unentally sensitive areas locateii ou the sites of the projectsincluded in the
Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during pmject-level
environmental review.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed
project?
The Aubum School Dishict currently serves appmximately 14,047 full-rime
equivalent ("FTE") students. Enrollment is expected to increase to appro�mately
16,413 FTE students by the 2018-2019 school year:
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities
Plan has been or will be evaluated dnring project-level environmental review when
appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Faciliries Plan, or any of
the projects contained therein, will displace any people.
- k. Proposed measures to avoid orreduce displacement impacts, 'rf any:
Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be=subject
to project-level environmental review and;local approval when appropriate. Proposed
mirigating measures have been or will be developed at that time,when necessary.
I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projected land uses and plans, if any:
The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with
existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive
planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
9. Housing:
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan.
15
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate
whether high, middle, or low-income housing.
It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will
eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital
Faciliries Plan on exisring housing have been or will be evaluated during pmject-level
environmental review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
Measures to reduce or control any housing unpacts caused by the projects included in
the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
10. Aesthetics:
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including
antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been �
or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
The aestheric impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been
or will be addressed during project-level environmenta] review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects
included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be detertnined on a project-
level basis when appmpriate.
16
� 11. Light and Glare:
a. What rype of light or glare wip the proposal produce? What time of day
would it mainly occur?
The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be addressed during project-leve] environmental review, when
appropriate.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere
with views?
The light or glare nnpacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
Off-site sources of light or glaze that may affect the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts; if any:
Proposed measures to mitigate light and glaze impacts have been or will be addressed
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
12. Recreation:
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the
immediate vicinity?
There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn
School District.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so,
describe.
The recreational impacts of the projects included 3n the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
17
The projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan, including proposed new school
faciliries,may enhance recreational opportunities and uses.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including
recreation opportunities to be provided bythe project or applicant, if any:
Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have
been or will be subject to mirigarion during project-level environmental review when
appropriate. School facilities usually provide iecrearional facilities to the comriidnity
in the form of play fields and gymnasiums.
93. Historic and Cultural Preservation:
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state,
or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so,
generally describe.
There aze no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the
project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of fiistoric and
cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be:addressed in detail during
project-level environmental review when appropriate.
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the _projects included in the
Capital Faciliries Plan has been or will be developed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any'
Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate.
14. Transportation:
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe
proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in tlie
Capital Facilifies Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level
environmental review when appropriate. ,
18
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate
distance to the nearest transit stop?
The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan
and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many
would the project eliminate?
Inventories of parking spaces located at the sitesof the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on pazking availability have been or
will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to
existing roads or streets, noY including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether publiaor private).
The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has
i I been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
e: Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o� water, rail, orair
transportation? If so, generally describe.
Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-
level environmental review when appropriate.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur.
The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or
will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
The mitigarion of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital
Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental
review when appropriate.
�
19
15. Public Services:
a Would the project resutt in an increased need #or public services (for
example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so,
generally describe.
The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Faciliries
Plan will significantly increase the need for publiaservices.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,
if any.
New school faciliries have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire
alazms, smoke alarms,heatsensors, and sprinkler systeins..
16. Utilities:
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water,
refuse service;telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other.
Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities
are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital.Facilities Plan.
The types of urilities available at specific project sites have.,been or will be addressed
in more detail during project-level environmental review when appcopriate.
b. Des.cribe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility proViding
the service, and the general construction activities on the §ite or in the
immediate viciniry which might be needed.
Urility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project-
level environmental review when appropriate.
20
(' ! C. SIGNATURE
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge.
I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signatur$��ir�h0 !�
Date Submitted: May 7> 2013
� I
21
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS � !
(do not use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the
types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater
intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly
and in general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water;
emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or
production of noise?
To the extent the Capita] Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities,
including new middle school and elementary school capacity and a high school
modemization, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more
likely: Additional impermeable surfaces, such as mofs, access mads, and sidewalks
could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters.
Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipriment that is installed
pursuant to the Capital Faciliries Plan could result in air emissions. The projects
inclnded in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or
release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of
diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generadng equipment. The District does not
anticipate a sigrificant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although
the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will increase the District's student
capacities.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will
be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
Stormwata detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City
requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Dischazge Eliminarion System
("NPDES") permitting requirements. Dischazges to air will meet applicable air
pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and
state requirements.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine
life?
The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these eletnents of the
environment. The projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan may reqnire clearing ; i
22
plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or
will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when
appropriate. The projects included in the Plan aze not likely to generate significant
impacts on fish or marine life.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life.
are:
Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be
idenrified at this rime: Specific mirigation proposals will be identified, however;
during project-level environmental review when appropriate.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The construction of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will require the
consumprion of energy. ,
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance
with applicable energy efficiency standazds.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive
areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for govemmental protection; s.uch
aS parks, wildemess, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitafi,
hisforic or cultural sites, wetlands,floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no
impact on these resources.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are;
No specific measures are being proposed at tivs time. Appropriate measures would be
proposed during project-specific review. Annual updates of this Plan will be
coordinated with the cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and
King County as part of the Crrovi+th Management Act process, one of the purposes of
which is to protect environmentally sensitive azeas. To the extent the School District's
facilities planning pmcess is part of the overall Growth Management planning process,
tttese resources aze more likely to be protected.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,
including whether it would allow orencourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with
existing plans?
l �
23
The Capital Faciliries Plan.will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is
incompatible with existing. comprehensive plans, land use codes, or .shoreline
management plans: The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or
the projects contained therein will directly affect land:and shoreline uses in the azea
served by the District.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilitiea
Plan or the projects contained therein aze proposed at this rime.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation
or public services and ufili4ies?
The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary
increases in the District's. need for public services and utiliries. The new school
faciliries will increase the District's demands on transpoitation and utilities. These
increases are not expected to be significant.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) ares
No measures to reduce or respond to such demands aze proposed at this rime.
;
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may corrFlict with local, state, or
federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment.
The Capital Faciliries Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
24