The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About07 10-23-2013 Comp Plan Policy & Text Amendment #2 s� �i POLICY & TEXT AMENDMEIVT (PT #2) INCORPORATE DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014-2019 , ' I i II.��II�I��{f IIIliI II�, I� �II� ryi��' UI�. I14�,. �I DieYin�e� S'chool Dist�ict Capital Facilities Plan , 2014-20�9 Board Approved July 30, 20.13 �� i 1 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICTNO.343 1320-178'�Avenue East Lake Ts►pps,.Was6ington 48391 (253) 862-Z537 BOARn OFDIRECTORS Gorey P�wlak Jolin McKennn T3m Bnrfaat Pete George Desais Gronholdt Dr.Jndy N�**^��a�_Marlinson,Snperintendent � � . � . I� l erin er � Educating every child for Con�dence toc�ay and � . ContYibution tornoxx- ow � � . Dieringer School District No. 343 Dieringer 5chool District i ; An Overvie�v Established.in ]89D,Dieringer 5choo]Dishict aonsoiidated with Lake Tapps School Districi in ]93b.The DistricNs thiee schonls,Lake Tapps EIementary Schonl,Dieringer Heights Eleinentary 5chool uncl Nortb Tapps Middle 5cl�ool,prrivide IC ttuough 8th grade eduontion,and serve as hnbs for comm�ity activities as niell.Dieringer School Distict#343 is lqcated in unineorporeted Piecee Connty,boimded an the east by tha V✓hite River,on the west by the Stuck River,on the nerth by the city�af Aubum,and on the south by the cities ofBonney Lake and 5i�mner.The District su=raunds the northern lwo-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 55 square miles. The curreat student erirollment is approximately 1,500 students in gredes kindergarten through eight Students in gredes first tiv�ough Hurd are housed at Lake Tapps Elementery,conshvcted in 2005 as a replacement project DieriagerHeights Elameniary opened "m the fall df2000 end is home to students in ldndergerten,faurth and fifth �ede., Originally cqnstructed in 1992 and added on ro in ]998 and 2009,North Tapps NIiddle School houses students in grades sizth-eighth. The district supports an additiona1555 high schno3 students who may select W aitend any pnblie lrigh sahool.The majoriry chose to attend Aubum 3tiv�rside,5wnner aad Bonney Lake High 5chools. i The district has a long standing history of providing Irigh qnality educ�on for all our stvdents. Our goa] is for our students fo gein_the stalls that w�'ll allow them to become snccessfiil,confrdent, contnbutrng members of society. Dieringer is composed of students who come to school well prepared and eager to leazn.Pm�enb m�e concemetl with student success and provide outstaading support for thea cln'ldren and the Die►mger 5chool Distr'ccG THe PTA nnd many volunteers contribute cotmtIess hours and resources to ovr schools and students. The community snppnrts the schools tluough the passage of funding issues to support bus ncquisitioq sfndent eccess to current technology and the cans�uation ef schaol faci7itia.Impact fees,includmg mteres� are held in reserve until used to meet Dislrict identified needs for ste acqnisi6on, edditional facilities and improvements undlor technology capitnl expenditnres. I ' DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICTNO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2013 Current Facilities Inventary ofPuhlic 5chaols NAME CAPACITY LDCATION Lalce Tapps Elementary 396 1320-178'�Ave E.,Lake Tapps Dieringer Heighls Elementary 547 2I 727—34'h St. E., Lake Tapps North Tapps Middle School 567 20029- 12�h St,E., Lake Tnpps — High.School 0 � , TOTAL I,5]D i I H - s @ 8 � 8 3 5 e 5 H 'a E "a @ °s a : H c A �r;.`-.��R,'�lld I , (' A U B�� A N � � -� �� i ,� �, o e �r ? , • ! � 'S a � . � � � i i � �� , 1 ! • ` � �- � � • � � . }� J � � '' , y . . . � 1�Irl a • • � I' y I ��. 1t �� .I � ti •� �5. ' �.t1 .O �! � ull � i � i , �� .:; e �' � _ , Y• • N_ �_ •. ,�. _�... ..�._. - --- -? -� - - s - �- � + ' s.��:; � i ��"'y�� . . �'.= :'' �, , `w°`�"; �` : nnrcx�es�roor i 7N0/AN p 1 ,I ��n��n: ' •,�ia�.�iw�.:�.'ir`��:� �N{y qlllr � . � �, p � }< �. .- � � � � ��,6'.Y.,' � LJl � � � �.�•s'' 1 'f4/.t ' •� ` �' °` - - `"rf.: ` (,•� � I� . _ ' � ' •, - � .�.�'x', i.= ." ' ry•�w _1 L _ y n . -� .. 'r�'!:a -4 -,-�_ ., rr•-;- , —" : _i � ""1--- aO � •'y .rF .y_ _... - ��.. „"° 7 .�:�"•��>i9• ''+i .:tit=, :� ` ��... •.\ f m. n .Y � C � ._._. t' iE)�n'^.e''c:• .µsKe'irNf ':.$:,e.l a 'y''.. . � „ . �:,i� ` . �i�lr.'�'.' �Q bml •�.� � . . � I.�.. Wiinu i `4, _ " '_t r"� '7:: �'x': �3'f�'°�' .,� 'i '` .i;'i{'.;,•.�.�y�� y �� R6ERl97�I�N _r ::� i:. , -k_ e?. :]. li � M'�a i I (`�� .�., •F:..>-.'" � I 4'. �i 's `qd",1.tyr: _. - -.7.7�" ' " - '17-' n � I ..,••,.^ �.c at +i� � � !_Y_ 'v ' - ' �it i d' 1�,.. w �i .q', ' , '� � � .'�1 • i 7' V.�^� _ d, � � ' I ` ifF i�� :��r•.."' � I tl 11 :� � I ,�:�:�. 1 `°3r ;�!'"�'6�_ �'Sro � � ; : "�• }u� 1 .1+..' !;jt'. ! �yg 'r;�. 6-r� c ' — � _ _ _�..�..-.�..� .L.w-.�xr. �I p ' :.:.. � t� ..I �i ;��rP=,"a*' � :,; Cy '. ',.;?•7�°r= - r v .�K,.F . i �'.. I . .>• ti 1 }:•.�� 1 z' t�S's :'�T. i • �`�_N�.si_"..s 1 � s-ti.' • r=_y:.r,.:�,:� 1 � �t ' N �i,�;� • + f� :: : . alt ;:a�:..t:''^ � �,., ', '�;� ,y 1 � I ,.� .�'. ':�.:;Mi.., i ' 4'•':• � ^ 1 � - ' •__ a �� :ll M.N' .:R, s��_,�>: ' � ��Y�� ,w � 1�"�a � �:.;�... � - na• ,e =: :�- L�--. G��J_�8..- - -- _ ,'�-. 1 ; � , a: �� :�1= fl e'` i� .^+ ' a ' i � �=- � ��.�.:,:� �� : ; ,. u a '-.."1,; �j.i,• � L ...'. � ��_� . .� ' y . ;....^:� "' � '.:.. � .. .. • ^ � �� .r. -t.'. � 1bT��ry • r j 1 OIERIN6ER8CHO�L�IS7RIOTN0.9d3 �{' �; � _ b�+'yi.+!Y_ " - ' �1:-_�,r� ,- � _ —_ �� n OISfHIC7B0UN0ARYMAP n }�, . 's _ '�„ II ' . `i� � 1�b �i �vwraau im�m nw.wmwd e �. '��' �j � ' _— � '�+ �mMOa..t Imt�whaa � • •4� • .' � 1 . � • �• r�L ' I 11 n WRaW�I VtURiMtml - �� `I OP �i 7 •� e�. nwwm, �.o� • • , a s �'� 'r , � . a..a+�e'w�+�aRe uAi.vw..om � � ' ' . � '"�--•.� � i • i . fl �qm°"im Nq�aN �C.�J ' ' �s 31� � e � r� �i".�V _`_'_ _j�" _' p a . ..._ _. _. � " �°---°--- . '� , - "'. � 3 � 1 1 i '�tY ,�.i � . - •°�F'/�Fa' •• NJ ' � Jy� Ck1o14M¢NOa I �•i y� l � ' ^� ' ' �� • i I /�` 11 ....I i�H3iFf' N � � ii�i�• ' I�' I 04NIMI0.M4•4� . � I ,� T . Y ^"'""" , .0 11 ' . d7if: �? � ,'� �._ ' -t—- � [I 6 4 ? 'e e 2 . � a S S E 3 5 @ 'e B � : _ ---- -n'�' ( Dieringer School DistrictProposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase June 2013 Prnposed Aousing Units: 5ingle Faau`ly-219 x .452 gencration factor=99 students K-8 grade Multi-family-324 x 242 genera6on factor=78 students K-8 grade {Calculated based on Auburn SD 2008 GeneratioqFactor) Enrollment ImpacY: 177 students K-S Estimuted38.8 stndents a yeaz over the period 201�1-2019 Potential enrollmentincrease= ]29�a {based on 1,5D� enrollment7?-]3) Inaease per grade level= ]7.7 students(based an ]0 grade bands) i Approximately stvdents per school:LTES 53;NTMS 53;DHES 7l District eruollment based on i2-13 and potential growth=7,677 students *cumnl progrnrn capacity hosed on tull-nnd half-time kindergnrten Enrollment Prajections � The Dieringer School District is locuted in an area that co�nnes to experience growth. This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: ea;ollment tend dats, groposed housing development, ead the mitigation impact fees received far new construction. The District oontinues to experieace slow, steady gro�vth in student eruollment. This has slighdy exceeded the Pierca County and Puget 5ound Edvpational 3crvice Dishict (P5E5D) enrollment gro�vth over the same period. A review of proposed consfrur.tion �viUiin the bon3ers of the Dieringer School District:indirates that the growth trend can be �pected to continue oy� the next four yeers and beyond. This gravrth trend has been slowed by current economic conditions,but w7l pick up in 2013 andbeyond. There are 219 single fami]y residenis slated for conshvction within the next five,years. The multi- family projects wil] contribute an additional 3?4 residential units during that tinie. These projects, togethcr with individval ]ots and genera] in-migration, _�e .anticipated to genecate an additional 177 studants in ldndergarten through eighth grade. lnformation from Pier�e county Planning & Land 5ervices ind{cates that there is space and zoning for approxim¢tely 1,20� additional housing lots in the westem portion of the distri�t. This creates a pofential for 542 additianal sNdents,ldndergarten tluougli eighth grade that aze not includod in the above nwnbers. To partially address this growth, the Disirict passed a 2006 bond issne to construct en udditional fiVe cta�srooins at`Dieim$er Heights Elementary. Those classrooms were completed und accnpied in 2009_ The bond issne aIso pinvided for the addition of an auxiliary gyin, health and fitness classroom, nad four scienae rooms ¢t Nort}i Tapps Midd]e 5chool. Thase projecLs were completed in 2009 and the new iastrnctional.spaces aze in use. Futim apticipafed growt}i wil] create the need to acqnire:an edditiona] school site and construct en additional school to house the growing student anrollmenk HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS Wfnter 2013 i' �; #1 Fuirtivea2her Cove Estates (1�Pierce Co -Notice of application 1/24/Dl -38 (2� 5ingle Family Lots (26 homes will be 6uiIt on ZS lots) - 1600.2000 blo.ck af l 6'n 5t. (a�fhe 17500-17800 bTock of 5vmner-Tepps Hvry: -4 lots sold; 5 houses completed , #Z Rainier Plateau (]D)Pierce Co -Notice of applicatian ]0/]3TQD - 10 Single Family Lots -End of 34�' St. -Site worlt campleted; home constroction TBD #3 Graadvie�v Ridge ll and]Ii (9)Pierce Co -Off 5urnner-Tapps Hwy. across from Drifiwood and Deer Island Dr: -Cnandvie�v Ridge Nu6ce ofApplication 1/]3/99 -49 Single Family Lots; completecl -III (9]ots}no date(na change) #4 Northlake Aubvm -north of Lake Tapps Elementary -197 Single Femily Lots -197 completed #5 The Estates Piercc Co -234 singl e family Lots -South ofmad tenninus fram Lakelend I-3ills Hwy. 234 hames completed #5 Tapps Meadow(VaaDcr Hoel�) (11)Pierce Co Notice of application 9/13/04 -11 large Iots -acrass from Snag Island -site work complete(no change) #.7 Country Creelc Estates(9)Pierce Co -1 D Single Family Lots-of�I5'h near Ed�varcls Road -ane(1) house completed #8 Farest Canyon Estates (121)Piercc Co -121 5ingle Faznily Lots�ffForest Canyon Rd. -peraut e�cpued #9 Forest Canyon Heights (1)Pierce Co -23 Single F�m'ly Lots—offPnrest Canyon Rd. -19 homes campleted;3 under coastruction; i #10 Terruce�etiv Totiva:homes Aubum -59 units; 7,2&3badroom vnits;East Valley and Lake Tagps Pkwy. -Aubum City Limi� -59 units completed #il Garter Estates (16)Auburn -l6 Single Fami]y Lots—Lake Tapps Pazkway and 179'h -7 6 hames (no corisiroetinn schedule� #12 Six I{ilns(324) Sumner -324 Multi-family pnits; north of Sumner Meadows —5umner City limits 324 units; conshvction permiriing; construction completed by]2ffi013 #13 Portofino (Lakeland � (25}Auburn -68 Single Feav7y]ots-north of Lake Tapps Parlavay -43 homes permitted 219 5iagle F�mily ilnits to he built 324 Multiple Fumily IInits to be bnilt ' i St�ndard of Service The Dieringer 5chool District houses ehildren in elementary schools serving stu�ents ]dndergazten through fifth grade and a middleschool thet houses�ades six thrqugh eighth. High schaal students,grades nine through hvelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarily in the Aubum and Sumner 5chaol Districts. Dieringei�5chool District foilows a tradiGoniil school calendarbeginning in early 5eptcmber and completing in mid June. Tbe daily school schedvles begin behveen 7:49 and 8:45 a.m. and end behveen 2:17 and 3:15 p.m. TheDieringer 5chool District standerd of service is based an class size and progr8n de�cisions adopted by the Dieringer Schoo]District Board of Directars. Bnsed on the disdict phitosophy regazding class si2e,the t�geted number ofstudents per classroom Idndergaden lhrough t}urd grade is 23, faurth through ftfth grade 26 and sixth through eighth grade 29. These class sizes 6ave an impact on facilities and the permanent capacity of each school reflecls these.class sizes. In the District,rooms designeted and essigned for spedal use are not counted as capacity classrooms. At the element¢ry level stndents aze provided mnsic instrucbon,physica] education nnd ert instroction in separate,non-capecity classraoms_ Computer]abs are provided ateaah school as non-oapacity spaces. Special education and remedial i ', pragramsaze pmvided as pulIout programs nnd do not provide capacity. At the middle school level,instruction is orgamzed azound a sn�period dey, clnssrooms are calculated as providing 5/6 capaaty to ac�ommodate teacher pinnning time in the instructional . space. i j DIERINGER SGHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities P2an Update, 2013 Dieringer School District 5ervice Standards Public 5chool`FaciIiaes (5auare Feef Per Studentl Elementary 5chool 120 Middle School 189 IuniorHigh NA High 5chool NA Dieriaeer School District Individuul Caoacitv Proiects f2QI4-1019) Elementary Schoot No.3 400 High School NA �i _ DIERINGER.SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 343 PERMANENT CAPACIN PROJECTS MASTER SCHEDULE March, 2013 Name Current 6 - Year Total Ca ac Caoacftv Ca aci 2Q'� 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Lake Tapps Elementary 396 396 . {LTES Replacement) Dieringer Heights Elem. 547 547 Elementary School No. 3 400 400 X North 7apps MS Incl 567 567 NTMS Additions 2008 TOTALS 1510 400 9810 i I DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, June 2013 GFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources andUses ofFunds (x$1,000) Sonrces of Fands Existing Revenue: -� Reserve $890 New Revenue: Bonds, Leyies, Fees; 5tate Matching Funds,Dedications,,Mitigation Payments $22:075 TOTAL SOURCES $22965 ` , Uses of Funds Elementary Schoo] No. 3 ($21;375) Non-CapaciTy Projects: School Site,Technology Upgrades, 1 590 And Boazd Approved.Prajecfs TOTAL USES $22 965 BALANCE Q , - ', DIERINGER,SCH�OL DISTRICT NO. 343 FlNANCE PLAN 2014-2019, June,2013 Permanent Capaclty Projacts Unsecured Source of Funds Secured 5ource of Funds Eslfmatad Esllmated Estimated Impect Bond & State Impact Cost Bond AmL State Metch Fees Interes Mata Faes Elementery School No.3 21,375,000 21,375,000 0 0 0 D 0 Total CapacllyP�ojects 21,375,000 21,375,000 0 tl 0 0 0 Nan-Capaelty Proiects Schaol Site Elem. No. 3 b00,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Technology Improvements 1,000,000 0 0 700,000 0 a 300,U00 8oard Appraved Profects 80,000 0 0 0 0 90,00� Tolal NornCapaaityProfects 1,590,O�p 0 0 700,OU0 0 0 890,000 TaTAL PROJECTS 22,965,000 21,375,OOD 0 70q,000 0 0 890,000 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update,20I3 Capital Facilities Requirementsto ZQ19 . TimePeriod Shident StoOent NetReserve Total Cost Papulatioa Capacity Or(Deficienry) (CosUStudent X Nel Deficidncy) 2D13 Ac[ue] ]500 1510 10 20I�{-20I9 Growtu 719 400 <319> Dieringer School District Cost Pec Student (2013 Dollars) Elpmentary Middle 7uniorHigh High ch s hools Schools Schools S2Z;500 $34,000 NA NA , School7m act Fee Calculattan 6173 DISTRICT DiedngerSchool Dishict : , - _ � School Site [WUan casC Acre�Cost er Acre lFaclfl Ca adlyJxStudeni GenerafEon Focim SSudenf Sludenl Fact Cosf/ FaaTi Focfor Focior Cosi/ Cost Acreage Acre Capac.ity SFR MFR SFR MFR. 9emenl 120Q $500.0�0 '4�0 0.322 ',`:`:::0_772 4.824 2580 Middle 013D `..0.070 . . ..... . .. .. ,. ....... . . TOTAL $4,824 $2,SB0 Sehvol Construetion Cost Fecilil Cosl/Facilff Ca aciYyJxSiudent Generalion Factor x ermonent/Total S Ft Studenl Student Facilify FacUify Factar Factor Cosi( Cos1/ Cosi Co aci SfR MFR SFR MFR Bemerrt No.3 �21,375.DOD 400 L 0.322 0.172 $17.2�7 4.191 0.130 0.070 TOTAL $77,207 $4,191 Tem_ � Fadlf � Cosk- Fad6ty Cast/Facllf Co aci x5tudent Generation foclor x em ar /Totd Square Feet Student Student Casl/ Casf/ :6Tem ! Foc�it Facpit Factor Fodor SfR MFR TotalSq.F Cosl S� SFR MFR Elementa �0 0 0.372 0.172 Middle $0 0 D.130 �.070 i � TOTAL $0 0 - � Stale Maiehin Credit Boeckh Index X SPI S uare Foota e X'Disirict Motch 96 X Sludenf Factor StudeM Studenl Boeckh SPI Disldd Foctor factor Cost/ Cosi/ Index Footoge Moich`Y SFR MFR SFR MFR _ 5ement Mlddle TOTAL $0 Tm�P entCredl SFR � MFR� Avero e Assessed Value 2012 $34B.47D $251.119 6 ItolBondlnlereslRate est 6/12 3.�;6 3.50� Ne1 Presenl Value of Avera e Dwel6n $Z.897,672 � $2,08&406 7p l0 Properiy Tax Levy Rate 2013 $3.9457 ' .9457 Presenf Value of Revenue 5lrsom , $11,433 $6,240 Fee Suma . Singfe Mullt le Fa 1 Slte Ac ukfi�n Cosls 4,824.00 $2580.00 Permaneni Foc1f Cost 17,2D6.88 9,191.25 Te ma Faclll Cost .00 .OD Sfate Molch Credil 0.00 0.00 Tax P ment Credil 11,433.34 ,2qU.23 FEE $10.598 $3,531 , FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% _ $5,299 .. FEE WITH DISCOUM OF 50%� $7,766 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE i ; for Dieringer School District No. 343 2013 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14day commerR and appeal period Description of Proposai: This tttteshold determination analyzes the environmenfial impacts associated wiEh the.following actions,which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1. The adoption of the Dieringer School District 2013 Six-Year Cap'�tal Facilities Plan:by the Dieringer School District for Uie purposes of plann'ing for the facilities needs of the DistricL 2. The amendment of the Rierce County Compcehensive Pian to include the Dieringer School DisVict 2013 Capital Facilities Plan asa part of the Cap'ital Faciiities'Pian Element of the Pierce CouMy Comprehenstye.Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Aubum to include the DieringerSchool District's 2013 Capital FaciliUes Plan as partof the Capital Faciiities PIan:Elemerit af the ComPrehensive Plans of the City of Aubum. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Rtan of the City of Sumner to include the �ieringer Schooi;DistricYs 2013 Gapital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facili�es Plan Elemerit of ihe Cpmprehensive Plans of the City of Sumner. Proponent Dieringer School �istrict No. 343 Location af fhe Proposal: ' The Dieringer School District includes an area of approximately.5.5 square miles. Portfions of the cities of Aubum and Sumner falFwithin the District's boundaries,as do parts ofvnincorporatad Pierce County. Lead Agency: Dieringer5chool DisUict No. 343 is the lesd agency pursuant to WAC 197-'i 1-92fi. The lead agency for this proposal hasdetertninetl that theproposal does nnt pose a protiable significanLad4erse impact to the environment An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030 (2)(c}.This decision was made after a re4iew of the completed ernironmental checklist and other information on fiie wfth the lead agency.Thts information is available to the public upon requesL This Determination of Nonsigntficance(DNS) is issued under WAC 187-11-340(2). The lead agency wiil not act on thls proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:D0 p.m., July 29,2013.The respansi6le qfficial will reconsider the DNS based on tirr�ely comments and may retain, modify,or, if significant adverse impacts are 6kely,withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the e�cpiration.of the comment deadiine. � Responsible Official: � ��'� Qr Judy J�eun eier:Martinson 5 perint�.tndent ieringer School Dtstrict No. 343 Telephone: (253) 862-2537 Address: 1320 '178�'Ave E. Lake Tapps,Washington 98391 Apqeals of this detertnination are govemed by Board Poltcy No. 6890 which can'be obtained from Dr. Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent, Diaringer School District No. 343, 1320176'�Ave E., Lake Tapps,Washington 98391 and pursuant to iNAC 680 and RCW 43.21 C.075. Date of Issue: July 15, 2013 Date Published June 5, 2013 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Errvironmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA),chapter 4321 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmer�tal impacts of a proposal before making decisions.An environmerttal impact statement(EES)must he prepered for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment.The puipose of this checklist is to provide informatian to help you and the agency identlfy Impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whettieF an EIS is required. Instructions for Appliqnts: This envirvnmerdal checklist asks you to describe some basic infortnation aboul your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this check[ist to determine whether the ernironmerrtal impa�ts of your proposal are signficant, requiring preparation of an EIS.Answer the.ques8ons briefly, with the most precise iniormation known;argi4e the best descripHon you can. You must answer each question accurately and cerefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions ftom your own observaHons or project plans without the need to hira experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write "do not know"or"doesno(apply."Compiete answers to fhe questions:now � mey avoid unnecessary delays later. Some quesGons ask about govemmental regulations, such as mning, shorellne, and landmark designations.Answer these questions if you cen. If you have prohlems,the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checiclist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you pla�to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land.Attach any addiGonal irtfortnation that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which yau suhmit this checklist may ask you to explain youranswers or provide additional information reasonably re�ated to determining if there may be significank adverse impact. Use of chacklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checkfist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addtion, complete the 5upplemental Sheet for nonproject actions{part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words"project,°°applicant,"and "properly or site°should be read as"proposa{,"°preparas," and "affe�ted geographic aYea," respectively. - A. BACKGROUN� � 'I. Name of proposed project, if applicable - The adoption of a six-year Cap'dal Faciiities Plan by the Dieringer School District.The Comprehensive Plans of Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of Sumner have heen and/or will be amended to include the Dieringer School �istrict 2013 Capital Faalities Plan in the Capihal Facilities Plan Elemert of each jurisdic6on's Comprehensive Plan.A copy of the Districf's Plan is availa6le for review in the District Office. 2. Name o4 applicant: Dieringer 5chool District Na. 343 3. Address and phone number of appiicant and contact person: Dieringer School District No.343 1320178'"Ave E. LakeTapps,WA 98391 Contact Person: Dr. Judy NeumeiervMartinson, Superintendent 7elephone:(253) 862-2537 ' 4. Date checklist prepared:June 5, 2D13. 5: Agency requesting checklist: Dieringer Sahool District No. 343 B. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The.2013 Dieringer School District Capifal,Facilities Plan.is scheduled to be adopted in July, 2013 and forwarded to Pierce County, Cities of Aubum and Sumner for possibie indusion in each juri�ction's Comprehensive Plan.The Capital Facii'fies Plan will be updated annually.Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific envtronmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes; explain. The Capital Facilities Plan reviews the purchase of additional properiy and the aonstruction of a new elementary school. � 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepa�ed, or wili be prepa2d,directly related to this proposal. j The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals oi other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your pmposal? If yes,explatn. No. 10. List any govemment approvals or pertnits that will be needed for your pmposal, if known. Pierce County and Cities of Aubum and Sumner will review and approve the Capital FaciliGes Plan for the purposes of impact fee orclinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendmerrt to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the ComPrehensive Plans ofiPierce County and Cities of Aubum and Sumner. ' 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposai,including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.There are several questlons later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspecis of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page.(Lead agenaes may modity this fortn to include additional specific infomtation on projed description.) � This is a non-project action.This proposal involves the adop6on of the DieringerSchool Distriat 2013 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inciusion in the Capital Facilities Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for Pierce County, City of Au6urn and City of Sumnec A copy of the Capital Facili6es Plan may be viewed at the Dieringer Schdol District Office. 12. Location of the prbposal. Give sufficient infortnation for a person to understand the precise loca6on of your proposed project, Including a street address if arry, and section, township,and range,'�f known. If a proposal would occur over a range af area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s}. Provide a Iegal description, site plan, vicinity map;and topographic map, ff reasonably availabie.While you should submit any plans required by the agency,you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit appGcations related to this checklist The 2013 Capital Facilities Plan wili affect the Dieringer School Disfict TheDisfict includes an area of approximately 5.5 squa2 miles. Portions of the Cityof Aubum and the Ciry of Sumner, and parts of.unincorporated Pierce County, fail within the District's boundaries. j , B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEMS � 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling,hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, and more than 2/3 of Lake Tapps. The DieringerSchool District iscomprised of a variety of topographic land fortns and gradients, including all of those.listed.Specific topo9raphic characteristics will identified during the planning and permit process for each capital proJect 6. What is the steepest slope on the site (approxfmate percent slope)? Specifie slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. c. What general types of soils are found on the sfte (for example, clay,sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soiis, specify them and note any prime farmland. 5pecific soil lypes will be identified during the planning and pertnit process for each capital project. d. Are there surface indications or hisiory of unstable soiis in the immediate vianity7 if so, descri6e. � Unstable soils may exist within lhe Dieringer School District� Specific soil {imitations on individuai project sites will be identified at the time of environmerrtal review. e. Descrihe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of arry filiing or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan wiil be subject to project spec�c ernironmental review and local approval at the Gme of proposal.Propqsed grading prajects,as well asYhe purpose, type,quantity, and source of fiU materials will be identified as appropriate to each project f. Could erosion occur as a resuit of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. lt is possible that erosion co.uld occur as a result of oonstruction projects currently p�pased in the Capital Facilities Pian: Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a s[te-specific basis. Individual projects will be subject to enviranmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious project construction(for example, asphalt orbufldings?j Percentage of impervious cover with vary with each capiNal facilities project and will be add2ssed during project-speafic environmental review. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any: � Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during projeci-specific environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and contrnl requirements wiil be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposa3 (ie., dust, automobile, odors, indusfrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generaily describe and gtve approxtmate quantities if known. Varfous emissions, many construction-related, may result.frorn individual projects. Air-quality impacts will be evalvated during project-specific environmerrtal7eview. Please see the Supplemerital Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are lhere any off-site sources of emissians or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. OfF-site sources and necessary mitlgation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Plans forindividual projects lncluded in the Capital Facilities Plan haJe been or wifl be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including o6taining of any necessary air quality permits, atShe time individual projects are fortnally proposed. Please see the Supplemental 5heet for Nonproject Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site(induding year-round and seasonal streams,'lakes, ponds,weUands)? If yes, describe type and'provide names. lf appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a neiwork of surface water bodies within the DieringerSchool District The surPace water regimes and flow pattems have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each indiyidual praject. 2) Wil the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet}the dascribed waters? If yes, please describe and ettach available plans. Some projects may require work near these described waters. Individual projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will he subje�t to environmental revfew and local approval requirements at the time the project is fortnally proposed. i 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge materfal that be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the s'ite#hat would 6e aifiected. indicate the source of fill materiaL lnfortnation with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge material will be addressed at the time ofproject-spec'rfic environmentat rev'iew. Applicable localregulationshave been orwill be satisfied. 4p Will the propdsai tequire surface waterwithdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantifies if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversionshave been or will be addressed during project-spec�c environmentai review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodp�ain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital facil(ties project:if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet appliqble local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges af waste materials#o surface waters? Ifso, describe the type of waste and anticipated 4olume of . discharge. Specificinfortnation.regarding discharges of waste materials,if any, wiil be addressed during project-specifc environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 6. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, orwill water be discharged toground water7 Give generel desortption, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Cap'dal Facilities Pian may impact ground water resources. Each project will be evaluated during project-specific envitonmental review.Appiicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. P{ease see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions.. 2) Describe waste tnaterial that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other souroes, if arry (for example:Domesfic s.e.wage; industrial, containing the foliowing chemicals. .;:agricultural; etc:). Describe the gerteral size of the system,the number of such systems,the number of houses to served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or wili be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. y c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runofF(including storm\water}and method of coqection antl disposal, if any(include quantities, if known).Where wilf lhis water flow?Will this water flow irno other waters? If so, describe. lndividual pmjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm wate�runoff consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If sq generally describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian will have varying environmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and lacal regulations prior to construction. lnformaUon regarding waste materials will be presented at ihe time of such review. Flease see the Supplemental SheeY for Nonproject Actions:. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: , Specific measu�es to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or wili be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperatlon wifh the.apprnpriate jurisdiction. i i 4. Plants: . a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree;alder, maple,aspen,other _ evergreen tree:fir,cedar, pine, other _ shru6s _ grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil piants:caHail, buttercup, buirush, skunk cabbage. Other _ other water plants:water lily, eelgrass, miifoil, other _ other types of vegetation There are various vegetative zones within the Dieringer School District.An inventory of species has been or will be produced as part of projec4-specific errvironmerital review. b. Whak kind and amount of vegetation wi11 he removed or altered? Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of projecY-specific environmental revfew at the time the project is formaily proposed. Please see the Suppiernental Sheetfor Nonproject Actions. a List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the.site. 5pecific impacts to these species from individual projects has been orbe determined � r at the time of project proposal and wilLbe;addressed during sfte-specific, project-level environmental review. d. Proposedlandscaping, use of nativeplants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: lndividual projects included in the Gapital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and local approvai at the Ume of project proposal. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animais which have been observed on or near the site or ' are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver;other. flsh:bess,salmon, trout, perch, crsppies, tlger muskies other. An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental�eview. i b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts fo these species frnm individual projects will be detertnined at the time of project proposal and will be ieviewed in cooperetion with the affected Jurisdictions. c. is the site part of a migretipn route? If so, explain. Imgacts on migrstion routes, i#any, will addressed during sfte-specific,project-leyel environmentai review. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, ff any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife hava 6een or wili be determined at the time of site-specific, praject-level environmental review. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove, solar)will be meet the completed projecPs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heaUng, manufacturing, etc.. The State Board of Eduption requi�es a life-cycle cost anatysis of all heatlng, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific pmjects to proceed. Energy needs will be deaided at thetime of speGfic engineering and site design planning. , Please see the Suppiemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. ' b. Would,your pro}ect affect the potentiai use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so,generally describe: Indididual projects of this Capital Facilities Pian will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adJacent projects during environmental review: c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: . Energy conservation measures will be considered at the prnject-specific.design phase and environmentai review. . 7. Environme�tal Health a. Are there any ernironmental health ha2ards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that coutdaccur as a result oi this proposal7 If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Acdons. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control ernironmental health hazards, if any: Proposed projects will comply with all currant codes, standards, end rules and regulati�ns. Indiyidual projects have been or will be subject to environmentsi reviewand local approval at#he lfine of farrnal submittal. b. Noise: 1) W hat types of noise exist in the area which mayaffect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of naises exist within the Dieringer School District Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during proJect-specific environmental review. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associateil with the project on a short-term or a long-tertn basis(for example:traffic: construction, operation, ather)? Indicate whet hours noise wauld come from tlie site. Normal construction noises would exist on a shor[-term basfs during school construction.There could be an increase in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific environmental rev(ew. ( Please see the SupplemeMai Sheet for Nonproject Actions. ' 3) Proposed measures to reduce or aontrol noise impacts, 'rf any: Project noise impacts have been orwill be svaluated and mitigated during the projecFspecific environmental review. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. S. Land and Shoreline llse: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties7 There are a variery of land,uses within theDieringer School District, including residential, commercial, industriai, institutional, utility, agricultural,forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture?if so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental revfew. c. Describe any structures on the site. i Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be ider�tified and described during projectspec�c environmentai:reyiew when appropriate. d. Will any struatures be demolished7 If so,what7 Structures to be demolished, if arry,will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process. e. What is the current zaning ciasstfication of the site? There are a variety of zoning classificalions within the Dieringer School Distriot. Site specific zoning irifortnatian has heen or will'be (dentified during project-specific environmeMal review. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation af the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific,environmental review. g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental Yeview. h. Has any part of the s'ite 6een ciassified as an"environmentally sensitive" area? If so,specify. Enyironmentally sensitive areas, if any,will be identified during project-specific � environmental 2view. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project7 This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmerdal review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Jt is not antfcfpated that proposed projects will displace anypeople.,Displacement of peoqle, if any,will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. k. Proposed measures to avoid or redu�e displacement.impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project specific en4ironmental rediew and local approval at the time the project is formapy proposed. L Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compaGble with existing and projected tand uses and plans, if any: Compatibifity of the proposai and specific projects with existing uses and plans haJe ; been or will be assessed aspart of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific ernironmerrial review. 9. Housing a. Approximately fiow many units would be provided ff any? Indicate whethec high, middle; or low-incame housing. No housing units would be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Any irnpact of project proposals on sxisting housing have been or would be evaluated during project-specific environmental review procedures. c. Propased measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or wiil be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height ofany proposed strvcture(s), not including antennas;what is the principal,exterior building material(s)proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-speafic, project-level environmental review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be.altered ar ohstructed? Aestheticimpacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or wiU be determined at the time of project-specific ernironmental review. 11. Light and Gfare: a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it rnainly occur? Light or gla2 impacts have been or will 6e determined at the time of project-speafic i environmental review. / b. Could light or gia2 from the finished project be a safety hazard or ir�terfere with views? Light or giare impacts have been or wiil be detertnined at the lime of the pro}ect- specific environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the Gme of project specific environmental review. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts,if any: MiBgation of light and glare:impacts have been orwill be addressed during prvject speciftc ernironmental review. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the irnmediate vicinity? There are a variety oi fortnai and informal recreational faciiities within the Dieringer Schoof District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses7 If so, � . describe. Recreational impacts have been or will be addressed during projectspecific environmental,review. Projects in the Capftal Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures tn reduce or control impads on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from indnridual,project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure..A school site usualty provides recreaUonal facilities to the communiry in the form of additional play fieldsand gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Culturai Preservation: a, Are there anyplaces or objects listed on, or proposed for, national,state,or local preservation registers known to be on or nexCto the site?tf so,generally descifbe. The existence of historicand cultural resources will be detertnined at the time of project-specific environmental review. i 1 h_ Generally descritie any landmarks or evidence of historlc, archaeological, scientific,or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An irrventory of historical s'des has been or will be conduoted as paA ot project specifiaenvironmentat review. c. Proposed,measures toreduce or control impacts, if any:. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis. 14. Transportation; a.. ldentify public sVeets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show oresite plans, if any. Impacl on public streets and highways has been orwill he assessed during project specifio environmerdal review. b. Is site currently served by pubfic transit? If not,what is the approximffie distance to the nearest trensit stop? The relaGonship between spec�c projects and public transit has been or will be assessed dudng project-specific environmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have7 How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of paricing spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improyements to existing roads or streets, not including dnveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue will be fully addressed during project-spec�c environmental review. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity ofl water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site specific, project-levei environmental review. f. How many vehicutar trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would oc�ir. Each project proposal has 6een or will be separately evaivated as to treffic impacts. �. I g. Proposed measures to reduce or conkrol transportation impacts, 'rf any: Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for pu6lic services(for example:fire protection,police proteation, health care, schaols, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital FaciliUes Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. Impacts have been orwill be evaluated on a projeckspecific basis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on puhlic seryices, if any. 5chools are built wiih automa6c securiry systems,fire alarms, smolce alartns, heat sensors and sprinklersystems. 16. Utilities a. Circle u6liiies currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service,telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. � � Utilities avsilable at project sites have been or will be fdentified during project specifc en4ironmental review. b. Describe the utifities that are proposed focthe project,the util'riy providing the service, and the general consiruction activities,on the site or in tfie immediate viciniry which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will 6e identified during project-specific environmental review.. C. 5ignature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. 1 undersfand that theiead agency is relying on them to make its decision. �-- - Signature: ` .r Dr udy t,meier-Martinson, Sup rirrtendent i i Date Submitted: June 5,2012 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very generei, it may be.helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment When answe�ng these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to result from#he proposal,woufd affect the item at a greater intensity or a4 a faster rate than if the proposal were,not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 'I. How would the proposal be likaly to increase discharge to water, emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent thisPlan makes it morelikelyShatschool facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some,of these environmental impacts will be more likely.Additional impercneable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots,sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm weter runoff, which could enter 1 surFace or,ground water. Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and ather equipment,and from addiflonal car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faculry.Any emissions resulting from this'Plan should not require theprodu�Gon,,storage, or release of toxic or hazardous su6stances, with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment.:Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentreting sevsral hundrecl children at a new faciliiy, especiaily before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur,these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is not possib[e to quantify those impacLs at this time.The impacts wouid depend on the type, location end distribution of housing,forexample,whether single or mul6ple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will 6e evaluated at the project specfic tevel and impacts will be mitigaYed accordingly.Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicabla County and/or City requirements end, depending on#he date of aduai construction, may he subject to a National Pollutant Discharge EliminaUon System ("NPDES") pertnitting requirements.Discharges to afr will be minimal, and will meet any applicable requi�ements of tHe Puget Sound Air Po1luBon Control , Authority. Fuef oil will be stored acoording to local and state requirements. i� �i 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,animals,fish, or marine life? The Plan itseif will have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending on the par6cular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat.To the extent residenpal development:is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals.There are nat IiKely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residerrtiaT development These impacts havebeen or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmerRal review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis,but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time.. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan wauld consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities,wquld consume petrateum based fuels. Reduced traffic resulting from construction of anot}ier neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumpfion at fhis ! j time.Jhese impacts have 6een orwill be addressed in more 8etail duringproject- specific enyironmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Faci�ities would be constrvcted in accordance with,applica6le energy eificiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensi4ive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)for govemmental protection; such as parks,wildemess,wild and scenic rivers,threatened ocendangered species habitat, hisio�ie or culhiial sites,wetlands,floodplains, o�prime farmlands? The Plan and facilitiesconstructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources. if is not possible to predict whetherother development made: possible 6y this Plan wfluld affect sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid o�reduce impacts are:. No specific measures are being proposed at this Ume.Approp�iate measures have heen or will be proposed during project-speciflc review:Annual updates of this Plan' will be coordinated with Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of 5umner as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of'which is to proteot environmentally sensiti've areas.To the eutent the 5chool DistricYs fecitities planning process is part of the overall growth management pianning process,these resources � are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the propasal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, induding whether it would allow or encourage land ar shoreline uses incompatlble with existing plans? The Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and Iand use impacts are: None are proposed at this time.Actual facifities constructed to implemerit the Plan will be sited and canstructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create substa�GaLnew demands for transportation.The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facil'�fes but also reduce traffic 6y creating the opportunity for more students to walk io a closer school.The construction of the facilities induded in the Capitai Facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public servtces and utilities, suah as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities. None of these impacts are likely to be significant.The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projects inGuded in the Capital � Faciiities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, orfederal laws or requirements for the protectian of the environmenk The Dieringer School DisUid Capital Facilities Plan wi31 not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protectian of tHe environment ��'"'" IERINGEI2 SCHOOL DIST'RIC'I' Educating every child for Confidence toduy and Contribution tomorrow June 5, 2013 Kevin Snyder Directorof Planning Ciry of Aubum 25 West Main Street Auburn,WA 98001-4998 Subject Dieringer School District-Mitigatioa Impact Fees Dear Mr. 5nyder. The Dieringer School District has completed the DieringerSchool District Capital Facilities Plan for 20142019. In prepaiing the updated Capital Facilities Plan the District once more reviewed the quesUon of the School Impact Fee Calculatioa. Based on the anatysis of the DistricYs site acquisition and gem�anent facility costs,the Dieringer School Distiict Boazd of Directors has deteffiined tha.t the appropriate mitigation impact fee for the permitting of a single family residence is$5,299 and$1,766 � per unit for a multiple family residence. , A review of the fees collected by the City of Auburn, on behalf of other school districts within the city, serves to support the validity of the Dieringer requested fee of$5;299 and $1,766 per unit for a multiple family residence. The properiy values within the boundaries of the Dieringer School District exe the liighest in Pierce County;this causes site acquisition to be exgensive and contdbutes to overall higher construction costs than other school disiricts experience. Therefore;it is most appropriate for the mitigation unpact fees colleoted on behalf of the Dieringer School District to be adjusted to more closely approximate the fees collected for other local school districts. The Dieringer School District requests that the City of Auburn adjust the mitigation impact fees coIlecfed on behalf of the District to the$5,299 and$1,766 per tmit for a muliiple family residence established in the Capital Facilities Plan for 2014-2019. Please let me know if you need further information by contacting me at(253) 862-?537. S' rely, � - ��'/2 dy e -Martinson � 1320- 178th Avcnuc Eost• L¢kc Tnpps,Washington 98391 •(253)862-2537•FAX{2i3)Bfi2-8472 Dieringer Schoal Disirict#343 rs an Equal Opportiurrh'IRS17fHflOq ��A,�"I' � � DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Dieringer School District No. 343 2Q13 Capital'Facilities Pian Issued with a 14-day commentand appeal period Description of Proposal: This threshold determirratian anaiyzes the environmental impacts.associated with the following actions,which are so dosely related to each other that they are in effect a single acGoni. 1. The adoption of the Dieringer School.District 2013 Six-Year Capital Faallties Pian by the Dieringer 5chool District tor the purposes of planning for the tacilities needs of the District 2. The amendment of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to include the Dieringer School �istrict 2013 Capita! Faalitiss Plan as a part of the Capital FaciliBes Plan Element of the Pierce ( County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of.Auburn to include the Dferinger School DistrE�t's 2Q13 Capitai Facilities Pfan as paK of fhe Capital Facilifles Ptan Element of the Comprehensive Plans af the City of Aubum. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sumner to include tha �ieringer School DisficYs 2013 Cap'rtal Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Faalities Pian Element of the Comprefiensive Plans of the City of Sumner. ' ProponenL• Dieringer School Disfict No.343 ; Loption of the Proposal: The Dieringer School District inciudes an area of approximately 5.5 square miies. Portions of the � cities of Auburii and Sumner fali within the District's boundaries, as do paRs of unincorporated Pier�e Gounty. LeadAgency: Dieringer School District No. 343 is the lead agency pursuantto WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposel has determined that the proposal does not pose a proba6le significant adverse impact to the enviranment.An environmental impact statement(EIS)is not required urnler RCW 43:21 C.030 (2)(c).This dedsion was made after a review of the completed ernironmental checklist and other infarmation on file with the lead agency.This infortnation is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance(DNS)is issued under WAG 19Z-11-340(2)..The lead agency will not ad on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue.Comments must tie submitted by 4:00 p.m.,July29,2013.The responsible official wiil reconsider the DN5 based on Umely comments and may retain, modify, or, if stgnificant adverse impacts are likely,withdrdw the DNS. If the DNS ts retafned, il will be final after the expiretion of the comment deadline. � . �� Responsible Qfficial: G2i/nl��d��'!'� D Judy . eu eter-Martinson perin` nderrt ` ' ieringer School District No. 343 � Telephone: (253)8fi2-2537 Address: 1320 178�"Ave E. Lake Tapps,Washington 98391 Appeais of this detertnination are govemed by Board Policy No. 6890 which can be ohtained from Dr.Judy Neumeier-Martinsan, Superirdenderrt, Dieringer School District No. 343, 1320178°i Ave E., Lake Tapps,Washington 98391 and pursuant to WAC 680 and RCW 4321 G.075. - Date of Issue: July 15,2013 Date Published June 5, 2013 I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST i I WAG 19Z-11-96D Environmental Checklist Rurpose o£Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA},chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the ernironmental impacts of a proposafbefore making deasions.An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the qualfty of the enyfronment.The purpose of this ahecklist is.to provide information to help you and ttie agency fdentify impacts from your proposai (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, 'rf ft can be done)and to.help the agency decide whether an EIS.is required. InsUucGons for Appiirants: This environmenffiI checklist asks you to dsscribe some basic infortnation about your proposal. Govemmental agencies use this checicl3st to detertnine whether the environmen#al impacts of your proposal are significarR, requiring preparatlon of an EIS.Answer the ques6onsbriefly,with the most precise informaGon known, or give the best descripUon you can. You must answer each question accurately and prefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most pses,you should be,able to answer the questions fram your own observations or pro}ect plans wifhaut 4he need to hi2 experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does no#apply j to your propasal,write°do not know"or"does not apply.°Complete answers to the quesfions now mayavoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about govemmerrtai regulations, such as zoning,shorelfne, and landmark designations.Answer these questions if yau can. If you have problems,the govemmentaF agencies can assisl you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of Iand.Attach any additianal information that wfll help desciitSe your proposal or its environmental effects.The egency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain yau�answers or provide additional information reasorcably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact Use of chedclist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions maybe answered "does not appiy.° In addition, compiete the 5upplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). Fornonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words"project,°"applicant,"and "properly ar site"should 6e read as"proposal,""prepares,"and °affected geographic area," respectnrely. i' � A. BACKGROUNO i 1. Name of proposed project, if appiicable The adoption of a six-year Cap'ital Facilities Plan by the Dieringer School Disfit�t.The Comprehensive:Pians of Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of Sumner have . been and/or wilT be amended to include the Dieringer School Distriot 2013 Cap'ital Facili6es Plan in the Capital Facilities Pla� Element of esch jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan.A copy of the DistricPs Plan is available for.review in the District Office. 2. Name of applicant Dieringer School:District No. 343 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: �isringer School District No. 343 'I 320 178'"Ave E. Lake Tapps,WA 98391 Contact Person: Dc Judy Neumeier-Martfnson, 5uperintendent Telephone: (253) 862-2537 4. Date checklist prepared: June 5, 20'13. � 5. Agency requesting �hecklist: Dieringer 3chool District No. 343 6. Proposed timing or schedule (inoluding phasing, if appiicable): The 2013 Dieringer School District Capital Faciiities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in July, 2013 and inrwarded ta Pierce County, Cities of Aubum and Sumner far possi ble inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan.The Capital Facilities Plan wil(be updated annually.Site-specific projects have been or wi116e subject to project-specific environmental review. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion,or further activiiy related to or connected wiUti this proposall tf yes, explain. The Capital Facilitles Piart reviews the purchase of additional property and the consWcfion of a new elementary school. 8. List any ernironmental information you know about that has been prepared, or wiil be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formai proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No. 10. List any govemment approvals or pertnits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Pierce County and Cities of Aubum and Sumnerwi0 review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital FaciliUes Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of Pierce County and Cities of Aubum and 5umnec 1_3. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, inaluding the proposed uses and the size of the project and sfte.There are several questions laterin this checklist that ask;you. to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need fo repeat those answers pn this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project acGon.This proposal involves the adoption of the Dieringer School District 2013 Capiffil Facilitfes Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for inclusion in the Capitel Facilities Plan element and possibte amendment of the£omprehensive Plans for Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of Sumner. A copy of the Capital Faalities Plan may 6e viewed at the Dieringer School District Office. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient irfiortnation for a pecson to understand the precise location of}rour proposed project, inciuding a sVeet address if any,and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposai would occur'over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(sj. Provide a legal description, site plan,vicinity map;and topographic map, if reasonably available.While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applicatfons related to this checklist The 2013 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Dieringer School District.The District inoludes an area of appmximately 5:5 square miles. Portions of the City of Aubum and the Cfty of 5umner, and paRs of unincorporated Pierce County,fall within the DisficPs boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1. EaRh a. General description of the site (circfe one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, and more than 2/3 of Lake Tapps. The Dieringer School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land fortns and gradients, including a{I of those listed. Specific topographic characteristics will identified during the planning and permit process for each capitai project b. Whai is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent siope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capifal project c: What general types of soils are found on the site (for e�cample, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? Kyou know the class�caGon of agdcultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types will be identified during the planning and permit pmcess for each capltal project. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immedlate vicinity7 Ii so, describe. Unstahle soils may exist within the DieringerSchool District. Specific soil limihations ! i on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quarrtitiss of any.filling or grading proposed. Indipte souroe of fill. Individual prajects included in the Gapital FaciliUes Plan will be subject to project specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposai. Proposed grading projects,;as well as the purpose,type, quantity, and souine.of fill materials will be idenUfled as appropriate to each projecL f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use7 If so, generally describe. , It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of consGuction projects currenUy proposed in the Capital Facili8es Plan. Individual prajects and theirerosian impacts wi11 be evaluated on a site-specific basis. Individual projects wilP be subject to ernironmental review and focal approval at the time af proposal. g. Abaut what percent of the site witl be covered with impervious project construcGon (for example, asphalt or buildings?) PercentaQe of impervious cover with vary with each capital facilities project and uvill be addressed during project-specific environmental review: , � h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion potential on individual project sites will be addressed during project-specifia environmental review. Relevani erosion reduction and controi requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (ie., dust, automo6ile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the projeck is aompleted? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions, many construction-related,may result from individual projecLs: Air-quality impacts witl be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources oi emissions or odor that may affect your proposal7 If so, generally describe. OfF-site saurces and necessary mitigation wilf be addressed during project-specific environmeMal review. c. Proposed measu2s to reduce or cantrol emissions or other impacts tn air, if any: Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or wi(i " be su6ject to environmental review and relevant local apprnval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality pertnits; at the time individual projects are fortnally proposed.Please see the Supplemerrtal Sheet for Nanproject Acttons. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface waterbody on or in the immediate viciniiy of the site (induding year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds;weUands)? If yes,descrihe type and provide names. If appropriate,state what stream or rrver it Bows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Dieringer School District.The surface water regimes and flow pattems have been or will:be researched and incorporated in the design af each individual project 2) Wll the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to(tirithiri 200 fest)the described waters7 If yes, please describe and atiecfi availa6le plans. Some projects may require work nearthese described waters.JndividuaF projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental revtew and local approval requirements:at the time the project is fortnally proposed. � 3) Estimate the amount of flll and dredge meterial that be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands end indicate the area of the site that would tie affected. Indicate the source of flll material. , Information with respect to placement or removal of fill or dredge materfal will be addressed at the time of project-specific ernironmental.review. Applica6lelocal regulations have besn orwifl be sati�ed. 4) Will the proPosal require surface water wi4hdrawals or diversions7 Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during p�oject-specffic environmental review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100.year floodpiain7 If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital fadfi�es project, if located in a floodplain area,will he required to meet applica6le local regulations for flood areas. 6) �oes the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters?If so, describe the type of waste.and anticipated volurtie of disaharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be. addressed duririg project-specific ernironmen4al rsview. Please sae the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. j , b. Ground: 1) �tl ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground, water? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantlties if knovm. Individual projects incfuded in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground waterresources. Each project will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review.Applicable local reguletlons have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Desc�ibe waste material that wiil be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. .; agricultural; ete.). Describe the general s¢e of the system,the number af such systems,the number of housesto served (if applicable), or the number of animais or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have 6een or will be addressed duririg stte-specific, project-level environmental review. � c. Water Runoff(including storrn water): �, 1) Describe the source of runoff(inciuding storm\water)and method of collection and disposal, if any(inclutle quantities, if known).Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences. Each project wili be subject to environmental review and appiicable local regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. individual projects includgd in the Cepital Facilities Plan will have varying envi�nmental impacts and wfllbe subject to appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Iniormation regarding waste materials wll be presented at the time ofisuch review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduoe or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce orcontrol runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction. � 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other � shruhs _ grass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ watsoil plartts:dattail, buttercup, bulnlsh, skunk cabbage. Other _ other water plants:waterlily, eelgress, miifoil,other _ other types of vegetation There are various vegetativezones within the Dieringer School Disfict.An, inventory of species has been or will be praduced as part of project-specificenvironmentaf review. b. What kind and amourrt of vegetation will be remaved or altered? Impacts on vegetation will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review at the time the project is fortnaliy proposed. Please see the Supplemental Slieet for Nonproject Actions: , c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Specific impacts to these species from individua! projects has been or be determined at the time of pro}ect proposal and will be addressed during site-specific, project-level � � environmerrtal review. d. Proposed landscaping, use of naGve plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, 'rf any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian will be subject to environmental reviewand local approval at the time of project proposal. 5. Animals: a. Circle any bircfs and anfmais which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or nea�the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other. mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, saimon, trout, perch, crappies, tiger muskies other. An inventoryof species abserved on or near sites hss been or will be developed during,project-specific environmental review. b., tist any ihreatened or endangered species known to be an or near the site. Specfic impacts tothese species from individual projects will be detertnined at the time ofproject proposal and will:be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdi�tions. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, if any,will addressed during site-speciRc, project-level ernironmental review. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any. Appropriate measures to presetve or enhance wildiife have been or wili be determined at#he time of site-specific, project-level enyironmental review. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil,wood stove; solar)will be meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Descri6e whether it wilf be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a Jife-cycle cost analysis of all heating, ; fighting, and insulating systems prior ta allowing spedfic projects to proceed. Energy needs will be deaded at the time of specific engineerfng and site design planning. Please see the Suppiementa�Sheet for Nonproject Act}ons. b. Wouid yourproject affect the potential use af solar energy by adjacerrt propertiesl ff so,generaliy describe: Individual projects of this Capital Facifities Plan will be evaluated as to their impac[ on the solar potentiai of adjacent projects during ernironmental review. c. What kinds of energy conservationfeatures are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures wilCbe considered at theproject-specific design phase and environmental revisw. - 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of frre and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Des�ribe special emergency services that might required. � Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. , 2) P�posed measures to reduce or ccntral anvlronmental health hazsrds, if any: Proposed projects will compty with all current codes, stahdards, and ruies and regulations. Individual projectshave been or will be subject to environmental review and loca! approval at the time of fortna! submitiai. b. Noise: 1) What rypes af noise exist in the area whlch mey affect your project (for example:traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Dieringer 5chool Distriot Specific noise sources have been or will be identified durfng project-specific environmentaf review. 2) What rypes and Ieveiaof noise would be created by or associated with the proJect on a sharl-tertn or a long-tertn basis(tor example:traific, construction,operation,other)7 Indipte what haurs noise would come from the site. Normal constn.rcdon noises would exist on a shori-term basls during school � construc6on.There could tie an Increase in traffic or operations-related noise which woutd be addressed during project spedfic environmental review_ Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. i " � 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project nofse impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-spec:ific environmeMal review. Eech project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and 5horeline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variery of land uses within the Diaringer School District, including residerrtial;commercial,,industrial, institutional, uUlity, agricultural;forestry, open space, recreatfonal,etc. b. Has the site 6een used foragriculture? If so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific; project-level environmental review. c. Describe any struclures on the site. Structures located on proposed sites have been or will be identlfied and described during project:specific environmenta! review when appropriate. d. �Il arzy structures be dem�lished? If so,what? Structures to be demo[ished, if any, will be idenCfied as part of tha project-specific environmental 2view process. e. Whaf is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning classifications within the Dieringer School District Site specific2oning information has been or will be fdentified during project-specific environmentat review. f. What is the current comprehensive pian designation of the site? An inventory of cbmprehensive pian designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. g. If applicahle;what is the current shoreline master program designation of the sfte? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. h. Has arry part of the site been classifred as an"environmentally sensiSve" area7 If so, specify. � ; Environmentally sensitive areas, if any,wiil be identified during project-specific environmenta! review. i. Approximately how marry people would reside or work in the completed proj�? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-specific environmental review. j. Approximately how many peopte wouid the completed proJect dispiace? It is not anticipated that proposed projacts wil]displace any people. Displacement of people, if any; will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displaaement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to proJect spec�c environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and , projected land uses and plans, 'rf any: � `� CompaGbiiily of the proposal and specificprojects with existlng uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during projeat-specific ernironmental review. 9. Housfng a Approximately how manyunits would be provided if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-incrome housing. No housing units wouid be provided. b. Approximateiy how many units, if any,would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. Any impact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be evaluated during proJect-specific environmental review procedures. c. Proposed measures to reduce orcontrol housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or cortrol any housing impacis have heen or wiil be addrsssed during site-specific, project-level_environmental'review. � 10. Aesthetics: i j a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed7 Aesthetic impacts have heen or will be determined at the time of site-specific, projecl-level environmental review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be detertnined at the Ume of site-specific, project-level environmentai rediew. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts; if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been o�will be determined at the time of project-specific enviranmental review. 11. Ligfit and Glare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposa]produce?What time of day would it mafnly occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the lime of project-specific environmental review. b. Could Iight or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interFe2 with views? Light or glare impacts have been or wiil be determined at the time of the project- specific ernironmental review. � c. What existing oH-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or wili be evafuated at the time of project specific environmental review. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Mitigation of Iight and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project specf6c environmentai review. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and iMormal recrea,tional opportunitiesare in the immediate vicin'�ty? There are a veriety of formal and informal recreational faciliUes within the Dieringer School District i b.. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses?lf so, describe. Recreational impacts have heen or will be addressed during project specific ernironmental review. Projects in the Capital Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation; including recreation opportunities to be proVldetl by the project or applicant, if any: Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individual project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure. A schoof site usually provides recreatianal facilities to the community in the fortn of � additional play fields and gymnasiums. '13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generalty descri6e. The existence of historic and cultural resources wifl be determined at the tirne of project-specific environmental review. h. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural Importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has 6een or will be conduoted as part of project spec�c environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or wiil be proposed on a project-specific basis. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets arid highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system.Show on site plans, if any. Impact on public streets and highways has been orwi0be assessed during project specific envlronmental review. b. Is site currenNyserved by public transit? If not,whatis the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during projeci-specific en4ironmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed projectfiave? How many would the project eliminatel An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been o�will be conducted during project-specific ernironmenfal review. d. Wi11 the proposal require any new roads or streets, orimprovements to exisUng roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue will he fully addressed during project-specifi�environmental review. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity ofl watsr, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site specific, project-level environmental review. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the camplefed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts: g. Proposed measures to reduce or control#ransportaGon impacts, if any: �. � Mitigation of impac[s on transportation has been orwill be addressed during project specific environmental review. 15. Public 5ervices: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for exampte:fire protection, police protection, health ca2;schools, oiher)? If sa, generafly describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects iden�ed in the Capital FaciliHes Plan will substantialty increase the need for other public services. Impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specific basis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 5chools are built with automatic security systems,fire atarms, smoke alarms, heat. sensors and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities , a. Cirole utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer; septic system, other. i UtiliBes availa6le at project sites have been or wlll be identified during project specific envirvnmental review. b. Oescribe the utilitfes that are proposed for the project, the utllity providing the service, and the general �onsVuction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete.to 4hebest of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on tHem to make'ds decision. .�-- - Signature_ ' 9v Dr dudy�i eier-Martinsori, Sup rintendent % � � 'Date Submitted: June 5. 20'12 , , , D. SUPPCEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECTACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) 8ecause these quesUons are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjuncbon with fhe list of the elements of the environment When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to resuft from the proposal,would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposai were not implemented. Respond briefly and tn genaral terms. 1. How woufd the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water,emissions to air, production,storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely.Additional impermeable surFaces, such as roofs, parking tots, sidewalks. access roads and playgrounds will increase stortn water runoff, which could enter surface or graund water. Emissions to air could resuit from heating systems, � emergency generators and other equipment, and from addiUonal car and bus trips to and from the school for students and facukty.Any emissions resulUng finm this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of tozic or haiardous substances,with the possible excep6on of sto2ge of diesef fuef or gasoiine for emergency generating equipment Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at anew facility, esp.ecially before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows addiUonaf residential developmentYo occur,these impacts would also increase somewhat, but it is.not possi6le to quantify those impacts at this time.The impacts would depend on the type, laxtion and distribution of housing,for example,whether single or multiple family and the Iocation of We school. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Facil'rties implemenGng the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific Ievel and impacts will 6e mitigated accordingly. Storm water detention and runoff wfll meet applicable Counly and/or City reyuiremerrts and,depending on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a Na6onai Pollutant Discharge EliminaUon System("NPDES") permitting requirements. Dischart}es to air will be mtnimal,and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Cor�hol Authority. Fuel oil will be stored according to locai and state requirements. � � 2. , HoWwould the proposal 6e likely to affect plants,animals,fish, or marine Iife1 The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending an the particular site, construction of facilitles may require clearing sites af piants and Ioss of animal habitat To the extert residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals.There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some weter quality degradation in streams and rivers could occur due to increased residentiai development.These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during projed-speci�ic environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals,fish, or marine life are: Individua! projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely ta deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy. Increased traffic resulting from the constructlon of additional facilities would.consume petroleum.based fuels. Reduced traffic resutting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuei consumed, but it is not possible to quanHfy such reduction in consumption at this ' � time.These impacts have been orwiil be addressed in more detail during prnject- specfic envirunmental review when appropriate_ Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Facilities wouid be constructed in accordance with applicabie energy effictency standards. 4. Haw wouid the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study)for govemmental protection;such as parks,wildemess,wild and sceniq rfyers,threateneti or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands,floodpfafns, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan should have no impact on these resources. It is not possible io predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affeet sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resour�es or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Na speciflc measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review.Annual updates of this Plan wilf be coordinated with Pierce County, City of Auburn and City of Sumner as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas.To the extent the School DistricYs facilities piann(ng process is part of the overall growth management pianning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. i 5. How would the pmposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use,9ncluding whether it would allow o�encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Pian will not have any impact an Iand or shorefine use that is incompatible existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shorelirie menagement plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce sho2tlne and land use impacts are: None are proposed at this dme.Actual facil'�ies constructed W implement the Plan will be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How urould the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilRies? This proposal should not ereate substanliai new demands for transportation:The projecls included in the Caqital Facilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new District facilit[es hut also reduce traflic by creating the oppartunity for more studerts to walk to a closer school.The construcGon of the facilitfes included in the Cap'ital facilities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and elsctric utilities. None of these impacts are likely to be sigNficant.The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projecfs included in the Capital Facilities Plan wi11 be addressed during projecNevel�eview when appropriate. � � Proposed measu2s to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possibie,whether the proposal may conflict with local,state, or federal laws or recjuirements for the protectlon of the anvironment The Dieringer School District Cap'ital Facilities Plan wili not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment