Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08 10-23-2013 Comp Plan Policy & Text Amendment #3 i POLICY & TEXT AMENDMENT (PT #3) INCORPORATE FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN , , , � FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 201� CAPITAL FAGILITIES PLAN ,� - - � �.�:� ,- - _ . � "T _ - � - `,� �`'T :C.< -_ �� �-�� '-1 _. •�- .~-__ -'__ ��:� _, � _ J `-� �= � .� � �;; - . �;;�.�`' . v . � r�, ,,_ _� �. . �� . , _ ,-�� � � � �� . _ ��,� � . �� . � �� �. ���- � . � , _ � `y .� � , UND -R� , UND -R� �!`� UND =1F �� �� �� i FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Adopted June 25, 2013 BOARD OF EDUCATION Tony Moore Angela'Griffin Ed Barney Danny Peterson Claire Wilson SUPERINTENDENT Rob Neu Prepazed by: Sally D. McLean Tanya Nascimento � FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS � , TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introducrion 3 Inventory of Educarional Facilities 4 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 5 Needs Forecast-Existing Faciliries 6 Needs Forecast -New Facilities 7 Six Year Finance Plan 8 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 9 Map- Elementary Boundaries 10 Map - Middle School Boundaries 11. Map - High School Boundaries 12 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION , Introduction 13 Building Capacities 14-IS Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 Capaciry Summaries 21-25 King County Impact Fee Calculations 26 28 - SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2013 29-31 PLAN � 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION � In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act ` � (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King Connty Code 21 A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, Ciry of Kent Ordinance No3260 effective Mazch 1996, and the City of Auburn OrdinanceNo. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its2014 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2013. Tfiis Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Aubuin and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of eacfi jurisiliction by reference. This plan is also included in the Faciliries Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the Counry to designate Urban Growth azeas within which urban gowth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Crrowth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King.Counry will encourage and acrively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan's estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. � � This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management AcK. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepaze interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Currendy,the District plans to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by apprmcimately 200 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. The estiaiated cost to rebiiild Federal Way High School is $106 million. On April 9, 2013, the District's board of directors passed a resolution in support of the construction site recommendation made by Federal Way High School staff, community members, & azchitects. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an unpact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. One such factor is SHB 2776,reinforced by the McCleary decision, which will phase in full-day kindergarten for all students and decrease K-3 class size from 20 to 17. This is proposed to be fully funded by2017-18. Using current enrollment, the decrease in class size would create the need for an additiona158 classes for K-3 students. This classmom need is expected to fluctuate due to changing demographics. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuaring populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. The maps included in this Plan reflect our current boundaries. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 -THE CAPTTAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires tliat several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This seotion provides information about current facilities, exisring facility needs, and expected future faciliry requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction,portables and modernization listed follows this. , � 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-51 Adelaide 1635 SW 304'"St Federal Way 98023 i i Brigadoon 3601 SW 336'� St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298�' St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47'�Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308'� St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32°d Ave S Au6um 98001 Mazk Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300'�St Auburn 98001 Mirror I.ake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) ]000 S 289�'St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327'h St Fedeial Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 ls'Ave S Federal Way- 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368'" St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12�'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325'"Pl Feiieral Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270�'St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42"'Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320'" St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42°d Ave S Aubum 98001 � Wildwood 2405 S 300'"St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16'"Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 91h Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 Is'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308�' St Aubwn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360'"ST Aubum 98001 Totem 26630 40t6 Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy(6-12) 26630 40'"Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-121 Decatur 2800 SW 320`6 St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16`"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288'�St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16'�Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28t6 Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy(K-12) 31455 28'"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Merit School(6-12) 36001 1�'Ave S Fedaral Way 98003 Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 21s`Ave SW Federal Way 98023 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY 1VON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILTTIES ' Develooed Proaertv Ceniral ICitchen 1214 S 332"d Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308`� St Federal Way 98003 Educadonal Services Center 33330 8�'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Suralnssed Sasce Adtninistrative Builiiing 31405 18`�'Ave S Federal Way 98003 MOT Site 1066 S 320`h St Federal Way 98003 Notes• In January 2012, the Administrative Building, Community Resource Center, and Student Support Annex were comliined intb the Educational Services Center. Central Kitchen will be relocated to this site in during 2013. The Administration Building and MOT Site have been surplussed and aze being marketed for sale. Undeveloaed Propertv Site Locatioa # 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351 st Street & 52nd Avenue S— 8.8 Acres 60 E of lOth Avenue SW - SW334th& SW 335�' Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320`�and east of 45`�PL SW—23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1�`Wa� S and S 342°dSt—Minimal acreage 96 S 308 St and 14�'Ave S— 36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are lazge enough to meet schoo] construction recjuirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the Dishict. i 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES � EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Im act Fees. Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Capital levy request Increase Ca aci As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Feileral Way High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High, and Decatur High in lata phases, supplant ttie need for oonsicuction of a fifth comprehensive high school. i , 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-ADDTTIONAL FACILITIES I NEW FACII.ITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities.. � i 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan 3ecured Funding Sources � � Im � ct Fees(1) � � $49,734 � I.andSaleFimds(2) - -�(b11:713;554) Bond F�mds(3) 56,917,271�. State Matc6(4) .�E12,806,988 TOTAL. $8,06 439� ?mjected Revenue Sources � StateMaoch 5 'E27.200,000 Bond or Le � Fimds(6) �.E70,000,000 Land Fund Sales 'n S 10,000,00 Im ct Fees 8� �$B00,000 TOTAL. $]08,000,0110 ixpenditures To[al Secured Funding and Pmjected Bevenue Sll 6,06q439 :Estiivated'aiidE� - Budget �2015 2016 2017 2018 2019� � 207A - Totet "��,�:TotalCost„�_„. [;,PiiorYe6r`a:�: _ �201344 �. 2014-15' � 2015-16� I 201617 2017-18 201&19 '2019-20 2014-207A - � - ._— _ _ _ _ �»7,i:;4 ` � ..,;:.: _:wa.. :,> �Wao 0 000 - aao.000:000 -sas;000:000 -aii;000,000 -a�:000.000 -�sios o 0 0f,.� t.y�i�=T�ii.`:` '{q.j. i �ri;;�,:?9P FN .+t..k�.'''': 3� w�:�.i T't E �°558 �000 � $200,000 '. $205;000 $215,000 $220,000 5225,000 $235,000 �$235,000 �$1,535000 ;����'$2�i20�0 �� �„r A'�.�i!'�u .�3�:;'i _ .___ . . . _ ' _ __. - _ _ .,.'"i;�� � T';_ � '.:i;` � rv' �k I ' "" ' " $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 .$1,000 000 � e:'''$lA0'`0 � K -iS10,585;000��, $40,400,000 $45,405,000 � $11,415,000 $420,000 $425,000 $235,000 � $235,000 . �.598,535000 °'T5109;12q000 �,City ofFedaal Wey and City of Krnt impect ke account,end will be '. nrnts. Thisisyearrndbalanceonl2/31/12: :currcmt ESC and MOT sitp.ThiSis ymr rnd 6alance on 12/31/1 2. iue includes intaxst effinings. iich will be used ro W support lhe rebuilding of Fedaal Way High Schooi. �ederal Way High School. Applirntion for funds is anucipaced ro be mado in July 2013.. 3 and a$60m six-yenr Ievy approved in Novemba 2012. I be used m retire debt incurred for Ihe acquisiUOn ofa replacemrnt Educetional Suppon Center. aI developments in the District over the next ax ycars.7'his figure assumes$25,000 per month for 1he next az years. onomy. �ject cost estimates. � Employment Tlansitlon Pmgram. The$2.1m pumhesc has been financed through a staie approved LOCAL proyrtsm through 2020. alling new pombles. The porfable exprnditure in futureytars may replact existing portables ihat are not funceonel. I in the capaciry summery. e FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION Z - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools fias twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service azea. The Career Academy at Tiuman High School serves students in grades 9-12. The following maps show the service azea boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students frotn throughout the District). The idenrified boundazies aze reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school popularions may necessitate a change in school serdice areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdicrion evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housnig developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major nnpact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts aze different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken unril new facilities can be built or until boundariescan be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. { Adjusting boundaries requires cazeful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is rewgnized that there is a potential impact on students who aze reguired to cliange schools. Boundary adjustments nnpact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not reqnire the construction of a complete school facility. School dishicts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district,not just around a single development. i 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN • • Federal Way , �- � � Public Schoals ; , _ ; ■ EfEMEMARYSCHOOLS ■ MIDDLESCHOOLS � ;� �` �r � � 1 AOEIAIDEELEMENTAN'! 36 FlNPLIBLICACADEMI' 3 HRIWOOON EIEMEMAnV 30 IIIAHEE MI�DLE SCHQOL '� �J. �,�._- 'L'$� ". 3 GMEIDTELEMENTART 31 KILOMIDDLESCFWOL '��¢� ��� ' d ENTERPRISE ELEMENTARY 3� W(OTA MIDOLEStHOOL �7 � �^ 5 GREENWBtESELEMEMARY 33 y�('qJAWEAMIDDLESCHOOL ��'� � 6 LAKEDOLLOFiEIEMENfANY . � �r� 34 SAGHALIE MIODLESCNOOL � 7 IAICEGAOVEEIFMENiARY 37 SEQIllDYAHMIDOLESCH00L �--�-�-- ��'/� ' 8 IAKEUNDELEMENTA0.Y 35 TOTEMMIDDLESCHOOL � , � 1 � :-„_ r \ 9 MAflB7WABiEIFMENTARY 381 TM1FACADEMY � � -•�� � �. � f J .l 10 MEREDRHF9LLELEfv�NTARY "��.��Sri� � 11 MIRR00.tAKEELEMENTARY .� + �'� � ��� `- 12 NAl1TIUKK�85CVqOL NIGHSCHOOIS 1��� �'�'� - -- �;� , 13 OLYMPICVIEW ELEMENTARY � OECANR HIGH I�,,,.. �.. _ ���� dl FEDEFAL WAY HIGH I� E t 18 PANTHEPIAKEEIEMENiARY YT.� .�• '� '"}r,�y} E21 TFI�M4SIEFFERSON HIGM �+ v SS RAINIE0.VIEW ELEMENTARY +'K , ' � �� � '� � � I6 SHERWOODFOF6fElEMENTAXV 45 TOODBEAMERNIGH l' F. ��� �r ' I '� �_, Q90 CAREERpCAUEMY�IRUMAN ¢¢¢��` �- 1� SILVERLAKEELEAQMMY � .� ��.a� r 18 STMUKEELEMENfARY 53 ETP(N00.MANCENTER � M .}^� rq;� � ' 19 SUNNYCNESTEIEMENTARY ' vF� � �1 ' � 20 TWINtAKESEIEMENTARY ■ ApMIIVISTRAT[VESITES A,% }� � �"?1T�r ��''� ` _ 21 VALNAWELEfdENTARY ° "N -�r' J7 � '� ' 22 WILDWOODELEMEdTARY ^y� �.��.-:�i.}�E p �...� - ` � _ . 23 WOOON10NfK-85CHOOL �-��J'�' •.,yC� I ' �i . y '_.r^ ^ �.�. �..�! .-+' � _ . S - i i r , ���"C' � _ � FWPS RtOPERTY . �.. Q .: � '� c - �fT _ �� i� � �y� : .i ^�«fi - 4 • _.6'� �cxd"1��_ � ' . eT las� �� � °�� ' ` ' ,� .� . �.. ' � ' - ?-i � t� '" -y _ � : _ , _i � A A l r > ���AJ��r � . t: IJ • l/r X � �. � Y. .i ,.wF.3 ^�a, �~ . ` t ,' � '7 { .+2+�'sc ° �'.,r� ' �l'�, �l ' � . : t '' r � �� . . i � ' _ � .,_ ; � _ k.{ �' .; �' r" S �� � - ,��'%F'* '9-' ; - _ •-»` •s_ ` � � :�. I^ 1 . � � It�- - � -r i- ':�- �� ; - ELEMENTARY ��ni,. �� _ ���, -+ � ,, 64UNDARIES +�x' � ��({!_c �� �" � i•-± y f - A -'_'}�r I ..=ir �W .? i, � s N �06183 4�6 49 L Flks Dateo 6.2.12 1� FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN � � • � Federal Way � � � Public Schools � v � , Q EIEMENtNtYXXOOLS � MIDDLESCH0015 � � \ �! T ' I ADFIAIDEFIEMEMARY 36 RNPUBLICACADEMY f� �l S. "� 2 BRIWDOONEIEMEMAHY 30 ILLAHEEMIDDLESCHOOL ' �� jy,Y�� �� �, 3 G�fflOTElEh1IXTARY 31 KILOMIDDLESCNOOL �. a EN7ERP0.15EF1EMt7iTAm 32 IANOTAMIDDLESCFIOOL I � ' � 5 GItEENGABIFSFJ.EMEHTARY 33 S4C41AWEAMIDDLESCHOOL �)� 6' UKEDOLIOFFEIEMENfARY •� ` �� � , , 34 SAGHl�IEMIDDLESCHOOI �� r `-1 7 LAKEGROVEELEMEN7ARY 37 SEQWYAHMIDDLESCHOOL � ) „y� � ~ `�` I f^` , 8 LAKE(ANDELEMENTARY 1 r+l'� — 35 707EMMIDDLESCHOOL J+ � ��-O 1 i`) ) 9 MARKTVAMEtFMEMRPV � T�Q�p� � 4 � i Li t� I� 30 MEREDRHNLLELEMENfA0.Y � r�--y�- ' - ` Il MIRNORUKEELEMENTARY � HIGHSCHOOLS _ ' J � ��I�Jq\� 12 NAUfILUS K.85CHOOL Qp DECANR XIGX � � 13 OLYMPICVIEWEI.EMENTARY dl FEDERALWAYHIGH ('� ld PANTNERLAKEELEMENTARY �'f ' � ��� 621 TVqM0.5JEFFEN50N HIGX � IS f1AINIEPVIEWELEMENTAM 'H, � � 4 65 TOD�BEAMERHIGH . f •- � I6' SHERWODOFDA6TElEMEMAIiY � t � d9J LA0.EEp ACAOEAM�T0.UMAN ti- 17 SILVERUNEELEMENTARY .�1.]I��� - ' 18 STA0.UKEELEMEMARY 51 EfP/NORMANCENTER N " ` 4_ i ) 19 SUNNYCRESfELEh�MARY � ' - 20 TWMIAKESELEhffMAM � ApMINISfR11TNE5I'fE5 ��;(,� '� = 33 VALNALU ELENENTARY �r-• � � J: I� -I( I - . 22 WILUWOODELEMENTARY �4.�{ M1 C 23 WOODMONTK$SCNOOL f ' ��. a t �-!�) _ � �,� � U 'l � FWP$PROPERTY �- � 1 1 �- � � � , � � � , � � � � ti�%'�',- � dm � �� � �,� � ' ' .Q' ` + �,. � � E o � r�,� � � ,� I � p��;^ . �y �('� ,:.e ��/ i r�a ' .0. � + r '/.J �-I id + � ` 4 � �1- . r �' � SJ � f�_1 I r.",� � �.. '-'� � !�'� �%� � � � �� ''� � •� ��, iJ� ✓ �. q . _ I � � OL �• � 'N I ` � � ,�� � I _ � , , � � , � � . MIDDLE > SCHOOL � � ' ` ` BOUNDARIES � . I-�;� t ` " ' � �' � ° N 063H3 O6 69 12 �Mkt . . DekacS.4.12 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN • � F�el"d� w�/ ; ; Public Schools �� • � °�� . � � EfEMEMfAR'ISCHOOLS � MIOOLESCXOOL$ \ � ��� � 1 ADEINDEEIEMEMf�M 36 FWPUBUCACADEMY '� �1�.- "' , 2 BIIIGAO00NElEMEN�ARY 30 iINHEEMIDDLE5CNO0L ' ' "j��� ��7�� 3 Gna�Di[�.tainm� � 31 qLOMIDDLESCHDOL :--�= , a EHTENPRIffELFMINTAM 32 IAKO7AMIODLESCNOOL i �\ , 5 GPEENWBlfSELEMENTAXY � Sp�pJp�yEpMIDDLE5CH00L � \)� ' 6 uKE00LtOfFEtEMEN7ARV gy SqGHALIEMIDDLE5CN00L t �� 7 LAI(EGROVEELEMEMARY t '-� J ' 37 SEQWYAHMIDDLESCHOOL { \ 8 lAl(EIANDELEMENfMY �' 7p7'EMMIDOLESCHOOL } � I / lA / 9 MA0.&TYAPlEfEMENTARY � � � � �. 381 TAf ACADEAAY 10 MEREDRH�1flLLE1FAffMARY '�-�� � 11 MIItAOR LAKE ELEMENTAM ❑ � 12 NAUfILU5K�5�OL NIGHSCXOOLS � 30 DECANP XIGH 13 OLYMPICYIEW E1EMDlTARY � I Sd PANTHERUKEEIEA7ENfARY al FEOERALWAYMIGM q�� a 621 THOM45JEFFERSON NIGH -1 15 �MUIIERVIEW ELEMEMARY Y 1) 4 16 SHEItWW�F00.EST.EIEMENfAM a5 70DOBEAME0.HIGH '� I I �F.'�{� 17 SILVE0.LAKEEIEhffNTARY a90 CAREE0.ACADEhTI�TIIUMAN � t T 51 ETPfNORMANCEHTER f.S ` � 38 SfA11lAl(E ELEAtENTAM �- 19 SUNNYCRESfELEMENTARY � � �� . 20 TWPiLAKESEIEhffNTARY � ADMINISTRATIVESITES �� I �� �. � 21 VALHALLAELEMENTARY - „ , L 22 WILDWOOD FLEMENTARY r^ t ""� }' � . � 23 WOODMONfN$SLHOOL � � Y t � k'� � �� I � FVYD$PIIOPERTY 1 + J � I o; '� w' a� � • d �: � � . z,�..� � � �' . U�� � � � ^ �r �„ . ..r� , • , ,. d w _ , � ;� r � �. I � . ��,� � �I ,� � � ' � � x � � �m J I ` i V HIGH �� �� 6 SCHOOL � ��..: . ► �'� ` � BOUNDARIES � ; ��I %� ° � d _� � � , ,: N mla3 66 69 12 � �Mln Drtu 7.4.12 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 20t4 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN i SECTION 3-SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities-The Education Progam Portable Locarions Student Forecast—2014 through 2020 Capacity Snmmaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units ; i 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Building Capaciries This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District's"standard oF service"in order to ascertain the District's current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into considerarion the education program needs. In geaeral, the District's current target class size provides that the average class size for a standazd classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 students. Due to current economic conditions, the target class size for K tlirough 2 has been temporarily increased. With the legislauve compliance with McCleary, we intend to decrease K though 2 class siies to 17 by the 2017-I S school yeaz. In grades 3-5 the tazget is 25 students..For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 stadents. Classrooms for studeats with Individualized Education Program (Special Education)needs aze calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI square footage calculation as a base line,the District Las calculated a progam capacity for all schools. T'he following list clarifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergarten: Every elementary school operates at least one all day Kindergarten program. Theseall day Kindergarten programs require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day session rather ihan two half day sessions. The District will operate 57 sections of all day Kindergarten in 2013-14. Once the State budget has been approved,we anticipate adding additional sections of all day Kindergarten. ; Special Education Resoume Rooms: Each elementary and middie school requires the use of a standard classroom(s)for special education students requiring instruction to address spec�c disabilities. English as s Second Langaage Programs: Each elementary,middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students leaming English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs,except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed,these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. High School Career Development and Learning Center(Resource)Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for scudents requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. PresehooUECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs&typically developing students at 8 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart progam at 6:schools (3 elementary&3 high schools). These programs decrease capaciry at those sites. Alternative I.earning Eaperience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience , through our Internet Academy. These studenu have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I ) BUII..DING PROGRAM CAPAQTIES ELEMEI�TARY BUII.DING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPAGTTY PROGRAM CAPACTI'Y Sciwol Nazne_ Headcourrt School Name Headco�mt FI'E Adelzid'e - 371 Dlahee 855 864 Bri " oon 325 Kilo �9 &i7 Camelot 255 Lakota _ 707 714 Etrt rise_ 461 Saea'awea 659 666 Gieai Gables 463 Sa halie 804 812 IakeDolloff 439 uo ah 569 575 Lake Grove 345 Totem 739 746 I.akeland_ _ 397 Fedenl.Wa ArblicAcadan ?A9 211 Mazlc Twain 327 Techiwl Access Foundazion Academ *' Meredith FLll _ 441 Merit Schoo]" Mirror Lake 337 2013'POTAI: Sy371 5,425 aafilas(K-8) 3Si Olympic View 357 •Mid�e Sctiool Average 737 745 Panttia Lake 427 Rainier View _ 435 ffiGH SCHOOL BUII.D[NG Slxrivood Foiest — 429 PROGRAM CAPACITY °'�ver Iake 419 I Lake 345 Schod Name F�Ieadcoimt FTE Simn'rest 408 Decatur 1149 1,336 Twinlakes 318 Fede�al Wa 1492 596 Valhalla_ _ __ _ 388 ThomasJeffcison 1349 443 Wildlvood 312 ToddBeamer 1142 __ _ 221.__ Woodmont -8 352 Career Academ at Truroan _ 163 - 174-- 2013 TOTAL___ 8,704 Federal Way Public Acad�y 109 117 1 ment Ttansition Pro am 48 51 Technology Access Foundazion Academy*' Elemeutary Average 37S Merit Schod" 2013 2 ' —_5, *Higlt SeLool Average 1,308 1;399 Not�s: *Federal Way Putilic Academy,Career Academy at Truman H'igh School,az�d Employment Trazuiti�Prognm _ are noo-6ouixlary schools. These schools are nM used in the calculated averages. '•Txhnology Access Foimdation Academy is hwsed mtirely in portables on the Totem Middle Schoo]s¢e. Merit School is hwsed entitely in portables on the Illahee Middle School site. r 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC'SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locarions The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of Dishict resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates thronghout the year and from year to yeaz. Portables aze used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance azea. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require addirional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilitie§ can be financed and consuvcted. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used forother purposes such as storage or child care progams, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condirion. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables aze not acceptable as permanent faciliries. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN � PORTABLE LOCATIONS PORTABLESLOCATED PORTABLESLOCATED AT ELEMENTARYSCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOIS Non ron msmurnan,u. .wsmucrsa+.u.. �rerwicnuu,u, wsmurna+u. Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 9 B ' adoon 1 FedeiaiWa 1 2 Camelot_ 1 Thomas Jeffason 10 Enf rise 2 1 Todd Beamer 9 GreenGables 1 TAFAcadem 8 1. Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAI. 37 3 I.ake Grove 2 Lakeland Mazk Twain 3 Memdith HiR 1 2 Micror Lake 5 PORTABLES LOCA1'ED Nauulus I AT SUPPORT FACILITIES ympic �ew I 1 Pacrtlner Lake MOT Raimervew 3 TDC 5. Shenvood Forest 3 1 TOTAL 5 Silver Lake 4 _ Star Lake 3 1 � Sunnycrest HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 1 2 Vall�alla S rnvoo orest 1 W�7dwood 4 o mom 3 To 1 T 3 22 PORTABLESLOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOIS nan M11fUCIlIX1AL P15'IRUCTONAL Ilahee 3 ilo 2 5 Lakota Sacajawea 8 Saghalie 2 2 Sequoyah 2 Totem Merit 3 TAF'Academ 8 1 25 11 � ' 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projecrionsare a basic component of budget development Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that.go into budget prepararion. The majority of staf�ing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional,supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projecrions are directly related to enrollment projecdons. Enrollment projections aze completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals,grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students.. The basis of pmjections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable popularion the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop avenges and project the averages forwazd. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggegate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system aze common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry,grades (kindergarten) aze a unique pmblem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district's census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate yeazs. The Federal Way School District is using various statisrical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollmenu aze evaluated below. The first method is astaristical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one yeaz. The projections vary depending on the number of yeazs of historical informarion and how they aze weighted. A second method is a pmjection using an enrollment projection softwaze package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggegate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Mastern" software provides staristical methods including trend line, standard gade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-yeaz projection of school enrollment. In December 2012,the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013. The model used to forecast next year's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market shaze losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migarion. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and gowth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else(e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN the school-age population over time.The report included 5 different calcularions to ! � pmvide a range of possible projections for the Disirict to the year 2022. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the aeed for facilities are a modification of the whort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the pmjections aze made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections aze studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing anci population in the region. The long-range projections tised by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projectionspublished by the Office of Financial Management for tfie State of Washington. Neaz term projections assume some gowth from new housing,which is offset by current local economic condirions. Current economic conditions do appear to be affecting eniollment. This is reflected in the DistricYs pro;jections. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes.a student. yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth pattems. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty,years. The Federal Way SchooT District is a partner in this plazuiing with the various jurisdicrions � ; ; comprising the school district geography. THese projections create a vision of the schooT district community in the future. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount=.5 FTE;M idd]e School FTE=.99 Headcount;High School FTE_.935Headcount) ' ' Total K-12 � Percent CalendarYr School Year Dementary Mlddle.School High ScLool NTE Changt 2008� 2007-08 8,912 5,167 6,637 20,7I6 2009 2008-09 8,865 5,155 6,456 20,476 -7.2% 2010 2009-10 8,738 5,119 6„594 20,451 r0.1%� 2011 2010-11 8.753 5.142 6,544 20.439 -0.l% 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 -0.3°6 2013� 2012-13 8.914 4.963 6,367 20.244 -OJ% 2014 B2013-14 9,086 4,773 6.268 20,117 -0.6% 2015 PIOt4-JS 9,136 4,818 6,158 20,312 0.9% 2016 P2015-16 9,169 J,969 6,713� 20;351 � 0.2% 2017 P20t6-17 9,385 5,072 5,967 20,424 0.4%� 2018- P2017-18 9,463 5,082 .5,927 20,472 0.2% 2019 P201&19 9,562 5,058 6,076 20,696 l:l% 2020 P2019-10 9.637 5,790 6,726 20,945 1.2% ElemerttaryR-5 MiddleSchool6-8 NghSchool9-72 � Enrollment History and Six Yeai Forecast 22,000 21,000 _ I. �' i i. 2�,��0 - � ��I �9,��0 � 18,000 ', 17,000 16,000 15.000 - - -.3, - - -- - - -- �i> �`'t�, `4. �� �% ��,,., 9`J° `'°. `'°� `J� `J°� �'°� `'°. �t 4 .� s � y ,� �Ff• �S �G i r �i� y �!S �T �> 9 io � SchoolYear OF1E I zo FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Canacitv Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled faciliries and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The information is organi�ed in spreadsheet format; with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluaring capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and Higli school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet proyide informarion about what facilities aze in place each year. i } , 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC,SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACIII'SUMNIARY-ALL GRADES � ; Bud et -- Pro'ected-- Calendaz Yeaz 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CAPACITY School Yeaz 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 BUILDING PR0C3tAM HEADCOUNT CAPACfTY 19,627 19,627 19,627 19,627 19,82T 19,827 19,827 _.,,FfE CAPAQTY�-_— � .' ' 20,067_ :1A,067_. :3A,067�_ _2Q06Z- -30;267_. '.20,26T . ;.20�67� Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way HS 200 Ad' sted Pro ramHeadcount Ca acit 19,627 19,627 19,627 19,827 19,827 19,827 19,827 _—___�..�_ _ � �_ _ r �_—.-_ —. r-- -- �Ad'�stdd:Pro- "FTE @a acit _ . ' . : .'. - ' ;:20,067 . ,20,069m _20,0.67_ �20;267,..;, ,20,267_ 'r20,269:,,, 20;267=,. INROLLMINT Basic'F"TEEnrollment 20,127 20,312 20,351 2Q424 2Q472 2Q696 20,945 Intemet Academy Enrollment(AAFTE) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) �.,Ba"sic;FPEFarollriient witliont;Intemet Acad"".;�._ �19,812__,;19;997_' :20,036__20;109_'. L20,157_ 20;3.81-� r20;630� SURPLtR OR(UNHOUSID) _ _ � _ ;-- - ,, -. _.. _ .._ _ PROQ2AMFTEGAP.ACIIY ` - _Z55; �70;� � 3,1_,_ ,_158� _:110� _ Y14)_� RIIACATABLE CAPACII'Y �rrent Portable Capacity 2,300 2,300 2;300 2,300 2,250 2,250 2,250 Deduct Portable Capacity (50) Add New Portable Capacity �'?:d'"ted Po`rta61e Ca 'acu`�._�._.<_:� V ,�2;300_ <2;300� �2;300� �2,?S0;_ �2;25U_,;_2;25�._. _'�9_ SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSID) PRO(�tAM AND RIIACATABLE CAPAGYl3' ..`�''_ .:. ..° _2 55'� 2��.70�.!3! 2 04 8'-,—�----�'—�-•_. r_`.a�_�_�: � _�.�;' . ' i 2 60_.. �Z 136� i.'�1F 87st 22 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUNIMARY-II.IIVIISVTARY SCHOOLS �i Bud et -- Pro'ected-- CalendarYear 2014 2015 2016 20ll 2018 , 2A19 2A20 CAPACIII' SchoolYbai 2013-14 201415 2015-16 201617 2017-18 2018-19. 2019-20 BUII.DING PROC�tAM HFAD COUNT CAPACI'I'Y 8,704 8;704 8,704 8,704 8,704 8,704 8,704 _FTECAPAGTTY-- - __ - ' _8.704__8;204_ '8,704_ �8;204_. _8;°704_. I�8;704_- -8;709� __Ad° sted Pro Headcount Ca acit _8;704 _ .8,704__ _8,704 8:704 8,704 8,704 8,704 �Ad'ted Pro " FI'E�'ac _- � ,.-8;704_ _8,704� i_8;704_�.8,204_ _8:204_ _8,ZU4� =8;704.. INROLLM[�NT Basic FT'E Fnrollment 9,086 9,236 9,269 9,385 9,463 9,562 9,631 Intemet Academy AA � (36) (36) (36) (36) (3� 3 36). Ba"s'ic,FLE�Fiiuollivent.wittiout Intei�rief�Acad"i �9,050_�9,200'._ _9,233�__ _9,3.49_ _9,427_,. _9;526'.__ _9,595� - — _ _ SURPL[� OR i�ID) PRO.($tAMCAPACIII'_� :; _(3.46 _ �(49.6)__. 529)_ '_ 645.)� _(Z23 _ _(833 .'' . 891) QIIACATABLE CAPACITS� Ctirrent Portable Capacity 750 750 750 750 750 750 750 Ad°sted P.ortable Ca�acit� ' • ' - _750..1 �75U_ �750= -_750� _750__750_ 750_.: SURPLi� OR(UNHOUSID) YROQiAM AND RF7,OCATABLE _ -- ,..'_'..�._�_:CAP?iCITY �404'� '254� _�2 1�N;�� _�l-0!27.:_. `.72 _ _ 14L : NOTFS: � Intema Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school fac�7rties. Z Relocatable Ca acit vs based on the number of ortables available and other administrative tec P Y � p hniques which can be used to tempozarily house students until pem�anent ficilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number ofportables that will be used ivill be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables fromthe instnictional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will dMemane feas�b�7ity forcontinued instructional use. � 23 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACTTY SLIMMARY-11�DLE SCHOOIS Bud et -- Pro'ected-- CalendarYeaz 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 CAPACITY School Yeaz 2013-14 201415 2015-16 201Cr17 2017-18 2018=19 2019-20 BUIIDING PROQiAM HFADCOiJNT CAPACITY 5,371 5,371 5,371 5,371 5;371 5,371 5,371 � ...FTEC.AP?;C1TY--_�:_ �: �3475_ �5'415_ _3,475_ '�5'425_ �5'425� �425_ _3:425, Add or subtract changes in capacrty Ad' sted Pro Headcount Ca acit 5,371 5,371 5,371 5,371 5,371 5,371 5,371 _� . .� - - -•. .� . r... -. ' _.. _"' �Ad'Led—Pro FI'E - acrt _-.;. a5,425� ; 5,425:.. �5;.425;_ ._3,42Y= _5,425_, '�5;425� �5;435..:. INROLLNII�NT BasicFTEEnrollment 4,773 4,818 4,969 5,072 5,082 5,058 5,190 Intemet Acad'emy(AAFT'�� (74) (74) (7�}) (74 (74) (74) (74) _ __ . _ . _ _BasicFlEFn`rollment_wifhout:In`temet:Acad'� � i4:699_ 1:4;7_44=; �4,895';,: _'4;998� ' S;008_ �=,4,984=: :5;116_ SURPL[� OR(UNHOi�ID) _ - . " :PROC�tAMCAPACITY - ..::726._. '.�681'` =530_ '.4427��417 '' 4¢1•� .,,309 RIIACATABLE CAPACITI� Glirrent Portable Capacity 625 625 625 625 625 625 6_ Add/Subt:act portable capacity _.4d� sted,Porta6le_Ca acit `� _: _675_ _. �625_s :�625:_ _ —625— —625— -615�� �625� SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSID) PROC,RAM AND RIIACATABLE ^CAPA�'1TY' . - - .,1' S1� �l� 06r '_1,155_; ..1'052, : .1,042��, „1r066� . . 934. a; NOTES: .� � Intemet Academy students are inctuded in pmjections but do not requuc full time use of school facilities. � Relocatable Capacity is based on the numberofportables ava�7able and otheradministrntive techniques which can be used to tempo:arily house students until permanent ficilities are ava�able.This is a calculated number only. The actual number ofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables firomthe instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. r i 24 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CAPACITY SUMMARY-ffi(�SCHOOIS Bud et -- Pro'ected-- CalendazYeaz 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2A19 2020 CAPACITY SchoolYear 2013-14 201415 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 BUII,DING PROQ2AM HEADCOUNT CAPACTTY 5,552 5,552 5,552 5,552 5,752 5,752 5,752 -- - - FTE CAPAQTY 5,938 5,938 5,938 5,938 6,138 6,138 6,138 Add or subtnct changes in capacity Add capacity to Federnl Way F3S 200 Ad' sted Pro Headcount Ca acit 5,552 5,552 5,552 5,752 5,752 5,752 5,752 Ad' stedPro FI'ECa acrt 5,938 5.938 5,938 6,138 6,138 6,138 6,138 INROLLNIQVT BasicFfEFnrollment 6,268 6,258 6,113 5,967 5,927 6,076 6,124 - Internet Academy(AAFI'��-- (2�5)- -(205) (205)_ _(205) _ _ (205) _(205) (2�5) $asic Fd without 7ntemet Acad 6,063 6,053 5,908 5,762 5,722 5,871 5,919 SURPLLIS OR(UNHOUSID) _ _ _ __ ----- - _ _-- --- --- PROQ2AMCAPACITY (125 (115 30 376 416 267 219 �tI�T.00ATABLE CAPACITY� Cuxrent Portable Capacity 925 925 925 925 875 875 875 Add/Subtract portable capacity Subtrnct portable�acity at Federal Way HS (50) ------ - ----- - - Ad' sted Portable Ca acit 925 925 925 875 875 875 875 SURPLi� OR(UNHOUSID) PRO(�tAM AND RFLOCATABLE CAPACn'Y; 800 810 955 1 51 1 91 1142 1,094 NOTES: � Iatemet Academy students are included 'm projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. Z Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other adimnnistxative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until pem�auent facilities are available.This is a calculated number only. The actual number ofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables wi71 detemrine feas�bility for continued instructional use. 3 Capacity for unhoused students will be accon�iodated with traveling teacheis and no planning time m some classrooms. 25 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN KinQ County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a shaze of the:impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This fortnula can be found in King County Code 2 TA and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school distdct by each new single or mulri-family unit and to gather some standazd construction costs; which aze unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was defennined sepazately for single-family nnits and'multi-family units. The factors used in the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generarion factors from single-family units that were construcfed in the last five(5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single fanuly and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Crrowth Management Act. 9 Temporary Eacility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 5 yeazs. Plan Year 2014 Plan Year 1013 Single Family Units $5,363 $4,014 Multi-Family Units $1,924 $1,381 Mixed-Use Residential� � In anticipation of the City of Federal Way Council's changes to Ordinance No. 95-249, which authorizes the collecrion of school impact fees. ; 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN { � � �STUDENTGENERATION NEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generaaon aber of -� - Numtie:rof Numbw of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High Sehoof �Total e FainBy Multl-Famlly Elementary Middle Sehool High_Sohool StudeM Student Studerrt Student ellin s Dwellin s 9tudents Studenis Students Paetor Factor Fador_ _ Eaetor 34-- - - 10 0 1 02941 0.0000 0.0294" -- -__0:3235_- 72 _ 5 0 6 02273 0.0000 0.2727— - _-.0.5000 _ 15 10 3 5 0.6667 0.2000 0.3333 _ 1.2000 8 8 7 -3" - 1.0000 0.8750 0.3750 ""- �2.2500 � 72 11 5 4 0.5000 02273 0.1818. _ 0.909T— 20 11 5 5 0.5500 0.2500 0.2500 1.0500 52 14 6 13 02692 0.1154 0.2500 0.6346 31 5 5 8 0.1613 0.1613 02581 0.5807 43 3 4 3 0.1163 0.0930 0.0698 A.2791 22 9 5 3 0.4091 02273 0.1364 0:7728 269 0 88 40 51 C ;`!0:3271 "i '°`° 0.1487,;�ii i _U.1898�r�0.6854,;,. Multi-Family Student Generation I ! . Elementa �. Middle School Hi School -TOtal Aubum 0.172 0.070 0.096 0.338 Iss uah 0:140 0.044 0.045 0.229 KeM 0.324 0.066 0.118 0.508 Lake Washington 0.049 0.014 0.016 0.079 Avera88 L _,�_0171...'__.. _:�_OA49_��:�,iz.OA� ._��:0.269 �m: 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE ' � Schoot Ske Acqutaition Cost: , Student SWden[ Faciliry Cost/ Facility Factor Facror Cost/ Cost/ Acrea e_ Acre Ca aci SFR MFR SFR. MFR Elementary 0:3271 O.IZ10 _ _ =_$0_ — _ $0 Middle SchooP 0.1487. 0.0490 $0 $0 HighSchool 4.85 $216,7T8 5] 0.1896 0.0690 $3,904 $1,421 TOTAL �.53.904 51,421 Sc600l Construction Cost: Student Sadent %�Perm Fac./ Faciliry Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Todl Sq Ft Cost Capaciry SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 95:82% 03271 0.1710 $0 $0 MiddleSchool 96.74% 0.1487 0.0490 - -$0 - $0 High School 96.53% $13,780,000 200 0.1896 0.0690 $12,6I0 - $4,589 TOTAL $12,610 ' 54,589 Temporary Fecillty Cost: Student Student %TempFac. Faciliry Facility Factor Factor Cosd Cosd Tora15 Ft Cost Size SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 4.18% 03271 0.1710 Middle School 3:26% 0.1487 . 0.0490 High Sc600l 3.47% 0.1896 0.0690 ' TOTAL SO $0 State�Matching Credit Calculatlon: Smdent Shident � • Construction Cost Sq. FL State Factor Factor CosU Cosu. . Allooation/S Ft Swdent Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elemeutary $188.55 0.3271 0.1710 SO $0 Middle School $188.55 0.1487 0.0490 $0 $0 High School $188.55 130 65.18% 0:1896 0.0690 $3,029 $1,102 Total 83 029_ _ $1 102 Tax Payment Credlt Calculatlon SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (Febmary 2013) $208,480 $80,075 Capital Bond lnterest Rate(February 2013) 3.74% 3:74% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $1,713,060 $657,968 Yeats Amortized 10 1Q Property Tax Levy Rate $1.61 $1.61 Present Value otRevenue Stream �$2 758 $1 059 SingleFamDy Multi-Famlly Residencea Residences Mltigatlon Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 3,904 $ 1,421 Permanent Facility Cost $ 12,610 $ 4',589 Temporaryfacili[yCost $ - $ - Staze Match Crcdit $ (3,029) $ (1,102) TaxPaymentCredit $ (2,758) $ (1,059) Sub-Total S 10;726 $ 3,848 50°/a Local Share $ 5,363 $ 1,924 Calculatedl aotFee S 5,363 S 19Z4 013Im act Fee S 5363 .S 1 924 2S FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION4 i ; SUNIMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2013 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2014 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated d.ocument, based on the 2013 Capital Faciliries Plan. The changes between the 2013 Plan and the 2014 Plan aze listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Yeaz Finance Plan has been mlled forwazd to reflect 2014-2020 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule. The plan is found on page 8. SEC'1"ION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Pmgram Capaciries calculation aze found on page 15. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 20. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2014 through 2020 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 20. CAPACTfY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings aze shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries aze found on pages 22-25. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION- KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calcularion, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 30 and 31. I 29 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES,PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM2013 TO 2014 , , STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generration factors aze.based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five,years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generafion factors between the 2013 Capital Faciliries Plan and the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted oradded based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksfieet is found on page 27. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on 2013 estimate for replacing Federal Way High is $106,000,000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The current capacity of Federal Way High is 1538. The addition of 200 seats will Tncrease capaciry by 13%. Total Cost SI06,000,OOOx.13=$13,780,000 SCHOOL ACOUISITION COSTS The dutrict purchased the Norman Center to house the Emp[oyment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this sfte increased our high schoo!capaciry by 51 studenu. � � Tota1 Cost S2,I00,000/2=$1,050,000 Costper Acre $1,050,000/4.85=$216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the2014 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary from year to yeaz as pmgrams aze added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN I IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2012 TO 2013 IMPACTFEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Faciliries 95.13%to 95.65% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Faciliries 4.87%to 435% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $185,012 to $185,012 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classroom portables pwchased and placed in 2012 Construcrion Cost Allocation $188:55 to $188.55 Change effective July 2012 State Match 63.50%to 65.18% Change effective July 2013 Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational $232,710 to $208,480 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— ; $77,926 to $80,075 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.84%to 3.74% Market Rate Property TaJC Levy Rate $1.45 to$1.61 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3795 to 3271 Middle Schoo] .1747 to .1487 High School .1988 to .1896 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated Counry-Wide Average Elementary .1620 to .1710 Note: Tlae last district multi fam:ly Middle School .0470 to .0490 deve[opment, bui[t in 2008,generates High School .0660 to .0690 a higher student yield than the county- wide average. Impact Fee SFR— $4,172 to $5,363 SFR based on the upclated calculation MFR— MFR based on the updated calculation , $1,381 to $1,924 31 I GLOBAL'END � � Each student will graduate with the skills and academic knowledge to succeed as a responsible, contributing member of a global society. STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT Each student at every grade level will perform at or above the state or clistrict standarcJ in all disciplines. Each student's progress shall be measured annually by academic growth.. RESPONSIBILITY Each student will take responsibility for their acedemicsuc¢ess; exhibiting positive and ethical personal behaviors,• treating others with respect, courtesy, and dignity. '. PARENT ENGAGEMENT Each student will benefit from the relationship eaeh school will establish with each parent, guardian or advocate. • • w Federel Way Public Schools F����I - `�y 33330 8°h Avenue 5 P1 '��I� ��OO�� Federal Way, Washington 98003 �.1 (253).945-2000 � a This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal WayPublic Schools: May 2013 3)405-18di�lus.8, c_.!e`I� Fedemf.Way. WA 1'L"OL fi�U+y . 98003-5433 PUU�IC'JCT.1�� � .Phan::(253)-943-2000 � } www.hvnzare � � July 1,2013 Jeff Dixon Principal Planner Ciry Of Aubum 25 West Main Street Auburn WA 98001-4998 Dear Mr. Dixon, Auached is a copy of the Federal Way Public Schoois' 2014 Capital Facilities Plan. The Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education adopted this plan on 7une 25,2013. T'he Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education Resolution No. 2013-15 directs the Superintendent W submit the adopted Federal Way Public Schools' 2014 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Aubum, A copy of the resolution is attached for your files. The expenditure report for the 2012 calendar yeaz is also attached. The Federal Way Public Schools' Boazd of Education requests the City of Aubum to increase the 2014 impact fee to $5;363 fot each single-family development and increase the impact fee to $1,924 for each multi-faznily development. Sincerely, �5� Robert R.Neu Superintendent c:Boatd of Education Sally McLean, Clrief Financial Officer Tanya Nascimento, Student&Demographic Forecaster Enclosure: 3 f FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS School District No. Z10 - IGng County 33330 - 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RESOLUTION N0. 2013-15 A RESOLUTION of ihe Board of Education of the Federef Way School District No. 210, to provide m the Gty of Aubum the 2014 Cap"ital Facilities Plan. WHEREAS, the Federal Way School District Board of Ecfucation hereby provides to tthe Gty of Auburn the District's 2014 Capital Faal'�ies Plan, documenting present and future school facility requirements of the District, and � WHEREAS, the Plan wntains a(I elements requir�i by the Growth Managemerit Act and City of Aubum Ordinance No. 5078, which addresses concurrency, allows each school dfstricE bo establ(sh thetr own standards of service, and prnvides for firture school impact fees. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Superintendent be authorized and directed to submit the adopted 2014 Capitaf Faalities Ptan to the C'�ty of Auburn. ADOFTED this 25th day of June, 2013. . d/i`� /%/- ��� �Board Secretary Dir�eta� �c.�...,. _ -..�. D e. ��� ���- ff2�,p�y SC7 Direchor •�����o C_�—Y,�A� 33330-81h Ave S � f�7�id1 11•� Federal Woy�WA 98003 Publ�C��I_. IJ , Pharte:(153)-945-2000 • 6 � - � . w+�w.fwns.nrz Apri126, 2013 � �����L�� � ' A?R z� 2D13 Jeff Dixon G17Y c��A!��u��<.N Principal Planner PLA�?�i!�!G ?� DEV=LePPqEiv`i City of Aubum Planning&Development 25 W Main Auburn WA 98001 Dear Mr. Dixon, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Environmental Checklist and the accompanying Determination of Non-Significance for the Federal Way School DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Plan. `The 14day cbmment period to submit written wmments or to appeal the decision begins on Apri126, 2013 and will continue through 430 PM, May 1 Q 2013. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional informarion. { Sinoerely, ! T�1nya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographic Analyst DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE. Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period ; i Descriptibn of Proposal: Ttiis threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, whioh aze so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1. The adoption of the Federal Way Public Schools'2014 Six Yeaz Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Faciliries Plan Element of the King Counry Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2014 (;apital Facilities Plan as part of the CapitalFacilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of ICenYs and theCity of Aubum's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2014 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Eleinent of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive:Plan. � Proponent: FederalWayPublicSchools L.ocation of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an azea of approximately 35 square miles. Areas of the cities of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines and Aubum fall aithin the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorponted King County. G�'� �:'°aM;'�'����� APR ?� 2013 CITY Gi ;-.Ui,U;;i�; PI.Af\�Pi�t�v & Cc�JELL"'r�;!RLi'y"j `��. Lead Agency:� Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has deternrined that the proposal does not have a probable sig�ificant adverse environmental impact on the environment An environmenta] unpact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. 'fhis information is available to the public upon request. This Deteiminadon of Nonsignificance(DNS)is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be subtaitted by 430 pm., May 10, 2013. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based . on tiinely wmments and may retain,modify,or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, witlidraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expuation of the comment deadline. Respons�'ble Official: Ms. Tanya Nascimento Enrolltnent and Demographics Federal Way Public Schools Telephone: (253) 945-2071 j Address: 33330 8th Avenne South Federal Way WA 98003 ' You mayappeal this determinafion in writing:by 4:30 p.m., May 10,2013 to Tanya Nascimento, Federal Way Public Schools, 33330 8th Avenue South,Federal Way,VJA 98003.. Date of Issue: Apri126, 2013 Date Published: Apri126,2013 � 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probabie significant adverse impacts on the quality of the.environment. The purpose of this checkiist is to provide information to help you and the agency idenrify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it canbe done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your pmposal. Govemmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the quesfions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You rriust answer each quesdon accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge.. In most ' cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to Irire experts. If. you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delayslater. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and iandmark designarions. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you, The checklist quesrions apply to al] parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different pazcels of land. Attach any additional information that wi11 5elp describe your proposal or its en4irontneatal effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain yoiu answers or provide additiona] information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impacG � `������� APR 2 b 2013� CITY OF'AUSU;-:i`d FLANNIP:G & DEVELOPME�VT 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � Use of checklist for nonproject proposais: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply"In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the refetences in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "properiy or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer;" and "affected geographic area," respectively. i ; + 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project;if applicable: Tfie adoption of a Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Feileral Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of plenningfor the DistricYs facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Ayburn's Comprehensive Plan will be.amended to inolude the District's 2014 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element. This project inay also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to,incorporate tfie District's 2014 Capital.Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way Schoo] District No. 210. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:. Federal Way School District No. 210 33330 8th Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person; Ms. Tanya Nascimento F,nrollment and Demographics Telephone: (253)945-2071 4. Date checklist prepared: Apri126, 2013 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing,if applicable): The Federal Way School District's 2014 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduleii to be adopted by the District in June 2013: T'he Capital Facilities Pian will be forwarded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Aubiim for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwarded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jurisdicrion's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Gapital Eacilities Plan annually. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject;to project-specifio-endironmental review. 7, Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or fiurther ac6vity related to or connected with this proposal7lf yes, explain. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � � The Capital Facilides Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District is currently implementing. This includes construction of Federal Way HS. Additionally the plan covers the purchase and siting of temporary facilities at various locations. Non-instructional projects included in the plan will consolidate support services operarions at a single location. This will include the construction of new facilities to house the Transportation, Maintenance and Nutrition Services departments. Current plans are for all the projects to be complete by 2015. 8. List any environmental information yon laiow about that has been prepazed, or will be prepared; directly related to thisproposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal7 If yes, explain. Perniits will be applied for with the appropriate jurisdiction for minor projects during the 2014 calendar year. ' 10. List any government approvals or per�nits that will be needed for your proposal, if l�own. The District anricipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and tiie city of Auburn will adopt this Capital Faciliries Plan into their Comprehensive Plan. The city of Des Moines may also adopt this Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Faciliries Eleinents of their ComprehensivePlans (when issued). 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There aze several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on tliis page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project: description.) � This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2014 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of Kent's and the City of Aubum's Comprehensive Plans. It may also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines. Tfie projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmentel review. A copy of the Capital Faciliries Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. �' �i 4 ENVIRONMENTAL C1iECKLI5T 12. Location of the proposal, Give sufficient informarion for a person to understand the , precise]ocation of your proposed project, including a street address if.any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide alega.l descriprion, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available, While you should submit any plans require3 liy the agency, you:are riot required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist, 'The Capital Faoilities Plan will afFect the Federal Way School District. The Disirict includes.an area of approxiriiately.35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the cities of Kent, Des Moines and Aubucn, parts of unincorporated King County, fall within the DistricNs boundaries. A detailed map of fhe District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. { � 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS �, j 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Federal Way School District is wmprised of a variety of topographic land forms and. gradients. Specific topographic characterisrics of the sites at which the pro;jects included in,the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during pmject-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or wil]be identified during project-level envimnmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note anypriine farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have ; � been or wi31 be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. � d. Are there surface indications ar history of unstable soils in the nnmediate vicinify7 If so,. describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-leveI enyiiomnental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fi1L Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-specific enVironmental review and local approval at the tixne of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as weli as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that tnne. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe, It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of projeot-specific environmental review when I i appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECKLIST g. About what percent of the site wili be covered with impervious surfaces after pro�ecY . construction(for example, asphalt or buildings?) �. The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any nnpervious cover constnzcted will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control ineasares have Been or will be addressed' during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. ReleVarit erosion reduction and control requirements will be met 2. Air , a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors,,qidustrial wood smoke) during construcrion and when the project is wmpleted? If eny, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various zmissions, many construction-related, may result:from the individual projects:included in the Capital Facilitias Plan. The air-quality unpacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the , Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. ' b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that rnay affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odar that may afFect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan haue been or will be addressed during project=specific environmental review when appropriate, c. Proposed measures to reduce or controi emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when appropriate and relevant local approval processes. The District wiil be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requiiements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environrnental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for NonprojectActions. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � 3. Water � ; a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate viainity of the site(inclpding year-round and seasonal streaais, saltwater, lakes, ponds, weflands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School Disirict. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specifio-environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patternv have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters7 If yes; please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed � from surface water or weflands and indicate the area of the site that would be a$'ected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be sari'sfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose, and approximate quantities if lmown. Any surface water witHdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during pmject- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if locaYed in a floodplain area, will be re,quired to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waYers? If so,describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects incluiied in the Capital Facilities Plan lias been or will be provided �- � during project-specific environmental review wHen appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose,and approximate quantities if lmown. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual pmjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific envirommental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplementsl Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground fromseptic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . .; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the.system, the number of such sysfems, the nwnber of houses to be served (if applicable), orthe niunbei� of animals or humans the system(s) aze expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects ' included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific enviromnental ' review. c: Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters7 If so, describe. Individua] projects included in the Capital Facilities.Plan may have storm water runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local storm water regulations. i i 9 ENVIRONMENTAL GHECKLI5T � 2) Could waste materials e�ter ground or surface waters7 If so, generally describe, � The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on groiznd and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-specific environinental review when appropriate. Eaoh projeot is or will be subject to a1T applicable.regulations regarding the discharge of waste inaterials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonprojeat Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any: Specifiameasures to reduce or controI runoff nnpacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or cucle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder;maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir; cedaz,pine, other � ; — shrubs — �ass _ pasture _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgass,milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetadon located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during pro;ject-specific environmental review when appropriate.. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteradon of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects inclnded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specifrc environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital � Faciliries Plan have been or will be deteiinined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other rneasures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site; if any: I Measures w preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Eaoh project is or will be subject to applibable loaal landscaping raquirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: Hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer,beaz, elk,beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon,trout,herring, shellfish, other: An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appmpriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species l�own to be on or neaz the site. Inventories of threateneii or endangered species lmown to be on or neaz the sites of the projects � included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed duririg project-specific environmental review when appropriate. a Is the site part ofa migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been ar will be addressed during project-specific envitonmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any: Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST � 6. Energy and Natural Resources: � a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs7 Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the completion of a]ife cycle cost analysis of alI hearing, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. Tlie energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be detertnined at the time of specific engineering and site design plaxuiing when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect ttie potenrial use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solaz potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservarion features are included in the plans of tliis proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy nnpacts, if any: , Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Gapital � Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health: I a.. Are there any environmetttal health hazazds, including exposure to toxic chemicals,risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous wasfe, that could occur as a result of trris proposal7 If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environxnental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regalations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the time they aze developed when appropriate. , ' 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) Whattypes ofnoise exist in the area wMch may:affect your project (forexample; traffic, equipment, operation,other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specifio noise source_s that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan.have been or will be identified during project-spgcific environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffio, construcrion, operation, other}? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create ]ong-term increases in traffic- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated andmitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Eachprojact is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. ' 8. Land and 5horeline Use: a. What is the current use of the,site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District,.including sesidential, commercial;industrial,institutional,utility, open space,recreational; etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe anyshuctures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental reView when appropriate. i � 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolished? If so,what? � The remodeling and renovation projects will require the demolishment of school structures.The shuctures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capitsl Facilities Plan have been or will be identi$ed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that aze wvered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classificarions under the applicable zoning codes, Site-specific zoning information has lieen or will be identified during project-specific environmenfal review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or wiil be completed during project-specific environmeatal review when appropriate. g. If applicable,what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program desigiations of the sites of the proj�ts included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project-specific environmental review ' ' when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Plan have been or will be identified during pmject-specific environmentat review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project7 The Federal Way School District burrently serves approximately 22,200 students. The student popularion is expected to increase to 23,000 by the year 2020. This projection has been adjusted to reflect the current economic conditions: The District employs approximately 3,200 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace7 Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will dispiace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts,if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to project-speeific envi=onmental review and local appmval when appropriate. Proposed mitigatittg aiea"siues will be proposed at that rime, if necessary. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected larid uses and plans; if any: The comparibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specificenvironmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how taany units would be provided; if an}�? Indicate whether high,.middle, or low-income housing. No fiousing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approxnnately how many units, if any, would be eliminated7 Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. ,' It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilitiea Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific envi=onmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measiues to reduce or controi housing impacts,if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilides Plan have been or wil] be addressed dnring project-specific en4iionmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structitte(s), not including antennas; what ia the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or willbe addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic nnpacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic nnpacts,if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or coritrol the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been ar will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare: . a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce7 What time of day would.it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light ar glare impacts of the projects included�n the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. i a What exisring off-site sources of light or glare may affect yourproposal? Off-site sources of light or glaze that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review wfien appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated anil informal recreational opportunides are in the ixnmediate vicinity? There aze a variety of formal and inforinal recreational facilities within the Federal Way School District. 16 I ENVIRONMENTAL CAECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. � The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specifia environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including pmposed renovated school and support facilities,may enhance recreational opportunities and nses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be pmvided by the project or agplicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the proj ects included in the Capital Facilities Plan haye been or will be,subjectto mitigation during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and g�mnasituns. 13. Historic and Cultural-Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or ]ocal preservation registers known to be on or next to the site7 If so, generally deseribe. There are no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registers on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or nexY to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detail during projact-specific j � environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmazks or evidence of kristoric, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or wil] be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impact on public streets and highways of the individnal projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specificenvironmental reviewwhen appropriafe. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approxnnate distance to the nearesttrnnsit stop7 The relarionship between the specific projects included in ttie Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-specifia envimnmentsl review when appropriate. c. How many pazking spaces would the comple4ed project have7 How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces located at the sites of the pro�ects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specifio endironmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or slreets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways7 If so, generally describe(indicate whether pnBlic or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvetnents to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-speoific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o fl water,rail,or air transportation? If so, generally describe. �. � Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehiculaz trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If Irnown, indicate when peak volumes would occur. The traffic impacts of the pmjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or.will be addressed during project-specific enVironxnental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigarion of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the projecf result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection,health care, schools, other)7 If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will ' substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECKLIST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systetns, fire �'. ' alarms, smoke alarms,,heatsensors, and sprinkler systetns. 16. Urilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer,sepdc system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Gapital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmentalreview when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the urility providirig the service, and the general conshucrion activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Urility revisions and construction needs have been or will be idenrified during project-specific environmental rebiew when agpropriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are.true and complete to the best of my la►owledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyi n thetn to m its decision. Signature: Date Submitt • Apri126, 2013 i � ]9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST �. D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions aze very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of acrivities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms.. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; producrion, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise7 To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional unpermeable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water runof�which could enter surface or gcound waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other sctiool equipment that is installed piirsuaat to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in sir emissions. The projects included 3n the Capital Facilities Plan should noY require tlie production, storage, or release of toxic or hazazdous � substances, with the possible exceprion of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline foremergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Faciliiies Plan will increase theDistrict's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any suoh iricreases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriaYe. Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or C`ityrequirements and may be subject. to Nationa] Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") pernutting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applica6le an�pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored. in accordance with local and state requirements. � 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants,anunals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Faciliries Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate severe impacts on fisH or marine life. 20 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, flsh, or marine life are: i 1 Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identified, however, during project- specifieenvironmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or nahual resources7 The construcdon of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources aze: The projects inciuded in the Capital Facilities Plan will be construgted in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standazds. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentslly sensitive areas or aress designated(or eligible or under study) for govemmental protecrion; such as parks,wildemess, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultuial sites, v✓etlands, floodplains,or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. � Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Federal Way; Kent, Des Moines, end Aubum as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas, To the extent the District's faciliries planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process,these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land.and.shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans7 The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects wntained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the azea served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resuiting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the pmjects contained therein aze proposed at this time. ' 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How wouid the pmposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or pu6lic services and utilities7 The projects included in the Capitai Faciliries Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public servioes and utilities. Upon the complerion of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan, however; tfie Dishict does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond exisring levels. Proposed measures to redvice or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at tlus time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capita] Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the proteclion of the environment. .i 22