Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12-02-2013 12-2-2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA PACKET (2)
CM' ML,q WASH N "ON CALL TO ORDER City Council Meeting December 2, 2013 - 7:30 PM Auburn City Hall AGENDA Watch the meeting video Meeting videos are not available until 72 hours after the meeting has concluded. A. Flag Salute B. Roll Call C. Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations D. Agenda Modifications CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE A. Public Hearings No public hearing is scheduled for this evening. Audience Participation This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form provided. C. Correspondence There is no correspondence for Council review. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Municipal Services 1. November 25, 2013 Agenda* (Peloza) Planning & Community Development 1. November 25, 2013 Agenda* (Backus) C. Public Works 1. November 18, 2013 Minutes* (Wagner) Finance 1. November 18, 2013 Minutes* (Partridge) E. Les Gove Community Campus F. Council Operations Committee IV. CONSENT AGENDA Page 1 of 465 All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. A. November 18, 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes* B. Claims Vouchers (Partridge /Coleman) Claims voucher numbers 426246 through 426448 in the amount of $2,228,919.51 and one wire transfer in the amount of $546.00 and dated December 2, 2013. C. Payroll Vouchers (Partridge /Coleman) Payroll check numbers 534256 through 534329 in the amount of $386,209.32 electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,325,225.31 for a grand total of $1,711,434.63 for the period covering November 14, 2013 to November 27, 2013. Annual On -Call Agreements* (Wagner /Dowdy) City Council approve the Annual On -Call Professional Service Agreements and Amendments for 2014 Public Works Project No. EM0902* (Wagner /Dowdy) Approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Small Works Contract No. 13 -13 in the amount of $14,692.78 and accept Construction of Project No. EM0902, Auburn Valley Drive -In Site Restoration Public Works Project No. CP1222* (Wagner /Dowdy) Permission to award Contract No. 13 -15 to Valley Electric Co. on their low bid of $351,662.00 for Project No. CP1222, Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvements (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council approve the Consent Agenda.) V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There is no unfinished business. VI. NEW BUSINESS There is no new business. VII. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 6465* (Backus /Faber) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington adding Chapter 2.22 to the Auburn City Code relation to parks (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6465.) Ordinance No. 6481 * (Partridge /Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6456, Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, and Ordinance No. 6473, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Page 2 of 465 (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6481.) C. Ordinance No. 6474* (Partridge /Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as Amended by Ordinance No. 6456 Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6473, Ordinance No. 6481, and Authorizing Amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Budget as Set Forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6474.) Ordinance No. 6489* (Backus /Tate) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, relating to Planning; adopting Comprehensive Plan Map and Text Amendments pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 36.70A (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6489.) VIII. RESOLUTIONS A. Resolution No. 4913* (Partridge /Coleman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, identifying the City Council's desire to move forward with funding preparations for the City of Auburn Community Center (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4913.) Resolution No. 5001* (Wagner /Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute a Public Way Agreement between the City of Auburn and Level 3 Communications LLC (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5001.) C. Resolution No. 5004* (Wagner /Dowdy) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, setting a public hearing to consider the vacation of the alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, South of East Main Street, within the City of Auburn, Washington (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5004.) Resolution No. 5006* (Peloza /Tiedeman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement between the City of Auburn and ID Consulting Solutions, LLC for wireless access point services (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5006.) Resolution No. 5009* (Partridge /Coleman) Page 3 of 465 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute an agreement for services between the City of Auburn and the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to operate a visitor information center, promote tourism awareness within the City and to provide services associated with supporting the City's economic development efforts (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5009.) Resolution No. 5011* (Wagner /Dowdy) A Resolution of the City of Auburn, Washington, declaring certain items of property as surplus and authorizing their disposal (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5011.) G. Resolution No. 5012* (Backus /Faber) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving the request for placement of a Joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial to be located in Les Gove Park (RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5012.) Resolution No. 5014* (Backus /Tate) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn Washington related to downtown redevelopment; authorizing the Mayor to extend the term of a Memorandum of Agreement with Ceradimm, LLC and the term of an option to purchase real property with Ceradimm, LLC, both approved by adoption of Resolution 4675, and to extend the term of an Exclusive Lease or Sale Listing Agreement with Co!dwell Banker Danforth and Associates until December 31, 2015 IX. REPORTS At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated with their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations. A. From the Council B. From the Mayor X. ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http: / /www.auburnwa.gov), and via e -mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet. Page 4 of 465 WAS AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: November 25, 2013 Agenda Department: Administration Attachments: 11 -25 -2013 Agenda Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Peloza Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Staff: Item Number: MS.1 MS.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 5 of 465 V'VAS 1-1 N To I. CALL TO ORDER Municipal Services Committee November 25, 2013 - 3:30 PM City Hall Conference Room 3 AGENDA A. Roll Call B. Announcements C. Agenda Modifications II. CONSENT AGENDA A. November 12, 2013 Minutes* III. ACTION A. Resolution No. 5006* Tiedeman A resolution authorizing a professional services agreement with IDC Consulting, LLC in the amount of $69,237.50 including tax to install, configure, and commission six city owned wireless access points via wireless and city owned fiber along Auburn Way between Muckelshoot Casino and Auburn City Hall. IV. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 6466* Held An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, creating a new section 10.12.410 to the Auburn City Code relating to inattentive driving V. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Photo Enforcement RFP* (Tiedeman) Draft Request for Proposal (RFP) of red light and school zone photo enforcement program and contract. *Dennis Grad, Executive Director for Auburn School District's Transportation Services Department will provide comment on school zone cameras. B. Street Swee Schedule* Baile C. AVHS Board Review / Animal Control Licensing Program* (Coleman) D. Ordinance No. 6474* Coleman An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013-2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6456 Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6473, Ordinance No. 6481, and authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013-2014 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B". E. Resolution No. 5012 - Re uest for Monument on Cit Pro ert from MS.1 Page 6 of 265 American-Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance* (Faber) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving the request for placement of a Joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial to be located in Les Gove Park. F. Concealed Pistol Licenses Benefit Cost Analysis (Lee/Pierson) G. Project Matrix* VI ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (httal/www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet. MS.1 Page 2 of 265 WAS AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: November 25, 2013 Agenda Department: Administration Attachments: 11 -25 -2013 Agenda Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Backus Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Staff: Item Number: PCD.1 PCD.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 8 of 465 P lanining and Community Development November 25, 2013 - 5:00 PM Annex. Conference Room 2 AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER A. RoII CaII B. Announcements C. Agenda Modifications II. CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes - November 12, 2013* (Welch) III.. ACTION A. Resolution No. 5012 - Re ' uest for Monument on Cit Pro «ert from the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance* (Faber) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving the request for placement of a Joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial to be located in Les Gove Park. B. Ordinance No. 6465* Faber An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington adding Chapter 2.22 to the Auburn City Code relation to parks. C. Ordinance No. 6489 - 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments* (Dixon) Review Ordinance No. 6489, 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Resolution No. 4913* (Coleman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, identifying the City Council's desire to move forward with funding preparations for the City of Auburn Community Center. B. Ordinance No. 6474* Coleman An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6456 Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6473, Ordinance No. 6481, and authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" C. Resolution No. 5001* Mund A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing the Mayor to Execute a Public Way Agreement Between the City of Auburn and Level 3 Communications LLC. PCD.1 Page 9 of 465 D. Resolution No. 5004* (Mundi A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, setting a public hearing to consider the vacation of the alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south of East Main Street, within the City of Auburn, Washington. E. Ordinance No. 6488 - School Impact Fees Code Amendment* (Dixon) Review and discussion of the proposed 2014 school impact fees for the Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School Districts. F. Com rehensive Downtown Parkin. Mana ement Plan* Yao/Chamberlain Status update and discussion of the draft Comprehensive Downtown Parking management Plan (CDPMP). G. Director's Report (Welch) H. PCDC Matrix* (Welch) V. ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwagov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. *Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet. PCD.1 Page 2Cbb8465 WAS AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: November 18, 2013 Minutes Department: Attachments: Public Works Draft Minutes Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Wagner Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Staff: Item Number: PW.1 PW.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 11 of 465 WAS 11 I a ",' 0 I. CALL TO ORDER Public Works Committee November 18, 2013 - 3:30 PM Annex Conference Room 2 MINUTES Chairman Rich Wagner called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall, One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington. A. Roll Call Chairman Wagner, Vice -Chair Bill Peloza, and Member Osborne were present. Also present during the meeting were: Mayor Pete B. Lewis, Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, City Engineer /Assistant Director Dennis Selle, Assistant City Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Utilities Engineer Dan Repp, Transportation Manager Pablo Para, Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Sanitary Sewer Engineer Robert Elwell, Water Utility Engineer Susan Fenhaus, Storm Drainage Engineer Tim Carlaw, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Planning Director Nancy Welsh, Principal Planner Jeff Dixon, Street Systems Engineer Jai Carter and Public Works Secretary Jennifer Cusmir. Members of the public in attendance included: Nancy Wyatt, President & CEO of the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce. B. Announcements There were no announcements. C. Agenda Modifications There were two modifications to the agenda. The first modification transmitted corrections to scrivener's errors in the November 4, 2013 draft Committee minutes and the second added Discussion Item I, Ordinance No. 6490, to the agenda. I. CONSENT AGENDA PW.1 A. Approval of Minutes It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee approve the Public Works Committee Meeting minutes for date, November 4, 2013, as amended by the agenda modification. Page 1 of 11 Page 12 of 465 PW.1 Motion carried 3 -0. B. Right -of -Way Use No. 13 -38 (Mund) Auburn Optimist Club's Santa House Engineering Aide Mund reported that the permit and conditions were the same as the previous year. There were no questions from the Committee. It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee approve Right -of -Way Use Permit No. 13 -38 for the Auburn Optimist Club's Santa House. Motion carried 3 -0. C. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -438 (Elwell) Update of the Sewer Comprehensive Plan Chairman Wagner asked about staff providing the Committee with a Gantt chart, outlining the scheduled for consultant tasks. Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell stated that there is a draft Gantt chart prepared and it will be provided to the Committee once there is a definite start date for the consultant. Chairman Wagner asked for more specific language regarding the City's agreements to coordinate with King County and other neighboring utilities, such as the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT), to be included in the scope of work. Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell stated that King County and the MIT had both been discussed with the consultant. Chairman Wagner said that he would prefer the language be strengthened in Task 2, Update System Background Information to better define how the City will prevent doing work that will not work with King County and /or the MIT. Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell stated that he will update the scope. Vice -Chair Peloza asked what utilities are included in the "neighboring utilities." Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell answered that it includes Lakehaven and the Muckleshoot Utility District. The Committee asked that each utility district be listed specifically. Chairman Wagner asked that Task 4.2, Future Conditions, be expanded and be more specific, stating that the City will be looking at future conditions that are outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Assistant Director /City Engineer SeIle noted that the service area should be included in the Comprehensive Plan and a separate evaluation should be conducted to examine potential annexations. If the decision was made to annex a service area, if should then be included in future Comprehensive Plans. Page 2 of 11 Page 13 of 465 PW.1 Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell stated that there will be steps for each task included on the Gantt chart, in response to a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza. Chairman Wagner recommended numbering each subtask, where effective. Vice -Chair Peloza asked about the details for the estimate of cost. Assistant Director /City Engineer SeIle stated that staff has been provided with a detailed cost estimate, which is used for contract negotiations. Sanitary Sewer Engineer Elwell explained that there have been some changes to the future plans of the City in regard to sewer over the past six years, which will be included in the Comprehensive Plan update, in response to a question asked by Member Osborne. The consultant will also be updating the City's hydraulic model and making revisions to how future areas may be served. Chairman Wagner noted that updating the Comprehensive Plans also gives the Committee and staff an opportunity to review policy. It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, Seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee recommend City Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -438 with Brown & Caldwell, Inc. for the Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update. Motion carried 3 -0. D. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -439 (Fenhaus) Update of the Comprehensive Water System Plan Chairman Wagner asked for more detail to be included in the task regarding potential new water use efficiency (WUE) measures, Task 801c. Water Utility Engineer Susan Fenhaus stated that the consultant is aware of the previous work done regarding Task 911, Bonney Lake Service Area Evaluation, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner. Utilities Engineer Repp noted that the engineer working for the consultant helped write the past report on the Bonney Lake service area. Vice -Chair Peloza requested a Gantt chart. It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, Seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee recommend City Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -439 with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for the Comprehensive Water Plan Update. Page 3 of 11 Page 14 of 465 Motion carried 3 -0. E. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -440 (Carlaw) Update of the Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan Chairman Wagner asked that more information regarding what Low Impact Development (LIDs) can do for the City financially be included in Task 7, Financial Program, (i.e. value to the utility). Chairman Wagner noted how the information will benefit the future rate study. Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw spoke about the current City policy which includes financial incentives in the form of system development charge credits for LID facilities and on -site stormwater management. Chairman Wagner stated that the activities, such as the LID System Development Charge (SDC) discounts included in the rate code, needs to be included in the Comprehensive Plan and should include the benefit to the system. Chairman Wagner spoke about studying the geographic layout of specific property development and the benefit to the storm system utility and how such a study may affect the rate study. Chairman Wagner recommended noting such a study as a task in the Comprehensive Plan, the Committee agreed. Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw pointed out that conducting a study may increase the cost of the update and the budget may need to be amended in the future. Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw answered questions asked by Member Osborne regarding the number of stormwater projects being modeled as part of the Comprehensive Plan update. Member Osborne asked for specific information regard the impact to the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw stated that information, size, cost and location, can be provided. Carlaw said that the list of projects will be brought to the Committee for review and discussion as well. It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, Seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee recommend City Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -440 with Brown & Caldwell for the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update. Motion carried 3 -0. F. Public Works Project No. CP1310 (Carter) 2013 Arterial & Collector Crack Seal Project Chairman Wagner asked about the possibility of negotiating the cost of mobilization of future projects. Street Systems Engineer Carter responded that the Engineer's Estimate for mobilization is typically 10% of the total cost of construction but could be more based on the Page 4 of 11 PW.1 Page 15 of 465 complexity of the project. Carter stated that the contractor determines the mobilization costs and includes them in their bid for the contract. Street Systems Engineer Carter stated that there was no crackseal treatment that went across the roadway stripes, so there was no cost for striping, in response to a question asked by Member Osborne. It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, Seconded by Member Osborne, that the Committee recommend City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Small Works Contract No. 13 -14 in the amount of $7,872.50 and accept construction of Project No. CP1310, 2013 Arterial & Collector Crack Seal Project. Motion carried 3 -0. III. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Resolution No. 5009 (Coleman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to Execute an Agreement for Services between the City of Auburn and the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to Operate a Visitor Information Center, Promote Tourism Awareness within the City and to Provide Services Associated with Supporting the City's Economic Development Efforts Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce President & CEO Nancy Wyatt was present. Ms. Wyatt spoke about the Google Analytics, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner and Vice -Chair Peloza. Ms. Wyatt stated that the City of Auburn is currently ranked sixth as far as showing up and getting new hits. The analytics are measuring the tourism website, the City site, the Chamber of Commerce site and all other sites that may include the City of Auburn. Chairman Wagner asked if the ranking is published. Ms. Wyatt said that it is not published but that it would be good information to put out. Finance Director Coleman stated that cost of services is funded at $45,000 from the Tourism Fund and the remaining from the General Fund, in response to a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza. Vice -Chair Peloza noted that the Outlet Collection is still referred to as the Supermall in parts of the report. Ms. Wyatt said that she would correct the report. Ms. Wyatt spoke about the effort to raise the awareness of the City in regard to tourism using search engine optimization, in response to Page 5 of 11 PW.1 Page 16 of 465 questions asked by Vice -Chair Peloza. Ms. Wyatt and Mayor Lewis answered questions asked by Vice -Chair Peloza regarding the Chamber of Commerce's relationship with area hotels. Vice -Chair Peloza asked if information regarding local events is disseminated to the local area hotels. Ms. Wyatt confirmed that it is. In response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner, Ms. Wyatt reported that the Chamber's interaction with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) is currently minimal, but the Muckleshoot Casino does participate on the Chamber Board. The Chamber views the MIT and the Casino as two separate entities. Ms. Wyatt explained how the City makes payment to the Chamber, answering questions asked by Member Osborne. The Committee supported adoption of Resolution No. 5009. B. Ordinance No. 6481 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as Amended by Ordinance No. 6456, Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, and Ordinance No. 6473, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Budget as Set Forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Finance Director Coleman was present. There were no questions from the Committee. The Committee supported introduction and adoption of Ordinance No. 6481. C. Ordinance No. 6474 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as Amended by Ordinance No. 6456 Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6473, Ordinance No. 6481, and Authorizing Amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Budget as Set Forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Finance Director Coleman answered questions asked by Vice -Chair Peloza regarding the after -hours stand -by pay for Innovation and Technology staff. Mayor Lewis answered that $15,000.00 is wanted for the KidStock Events six year action plan, in response to a question asked by Page 6 of 11 PW.1 Page 17 of 465 PW.1 Member Osborne. Finance Director Coleman will provide the Committee with additional information on air cards at the request of Vice -Chair Peloza. Finance Director Coleman stated she will provide the Committee with more detail regarding the King County tipping fee increase, following a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza. The Committee supported introduction and adoption of Ordinance No. 6474. D. 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Planning Commission Recommendations (Dixon) Review and discuss the 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Planning Commission Recommendations Principal Planner Dixon explained that the purpose of the discussion with the Committee is to talk about the annual Comprehensive Plan amendments and specifically the Planning Commission recommendations on the amendments. Dixon stated that the proposed amendments consist of six text amendments and three map amendments. Two of the map amendments have been privately initiated applications and one is a City initiated map amendment. Principal Planner Dixon reported that the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on all of the amendments on October 22, 2013. The Commission recommends approval of all of the changes. Dixon noted that the Planning Commission recommendations were also reviewed at the November 12, 2013 Planning and Community Development Committee Meeting. The recommendations are being taken to the November 25, 2013 Planning and Community Development Committee Meeting for approval to move them forward for City Council action on December 2, 2013. Principal Planner Dixon answered questions asked by Chairman Wagner regarding how the rezoning would take place following the first of the year, 2014. Dixon stated that the rezones that are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan are taken to the City's Hearings Examiner. Dixon pointed out that the items that have been added are included in the Committee Members' Comprehensive Plans Binders and have been printed on yellow paper. The changes consist of the draft minutes from the Planning Commission's Public Hearing, a support letter from the City of Federal Way School District in support of adopting their capital facilities plans, and five pages that were changed in the City's Capital Facilities Plan. Page 7 of 11 Page 18 of 465 In response to a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza, Principal Planner Dixon stated that there is an application fee for the Comprehensive Plan amendment, a simultaneous rezone, and separate application for the environmental checklist, which is required for the environmental review process. E. Fulmer Wellfield Feasibility Costs & Schedule (Repp) Director Dowdy announced that staff received the City's Cascade Water Alliance certificate and the City can now move forward with negotiations with Tacoma Public Utilities. Director Dowdy distributed a term sheet received from the Tacoma staff that was received at a wholesale water conference. Dowdy explained the methods by which Tacoma intends to encourage wholesale water users to take more water. The Committee, Mayor Lewis and Director Dowdy discussed the reduction in the cost of water and the terms sheet. Director Dowdy recognized Mayor Lewis' contribution to the negotiations. Director Dowdy suggested that the terms be reviewed at the next Public Works Committee Meeting so that the Mayor can provide Tacoma with a letter of response to the terms. Mayor Lewis spoke about the importance of preserving the City's water rights and continuing with the improvements to Fulmer Field. Utilities Engineer Repp stated that the new Tacoma water terms may affect how the City decided to move forward with the improvements of Fulmer Field. Utilities Engineer Repp answered to questions asked by Member Osborne regarding the chemical redevelopment of Wells 2 and 6. Utilities Engineer Repp reviewed the estimate of cost and budget summary with the Committee. Utilities Engineer Repp spoke about some of the decisions that the Committee needs to consider regarding the treatment and rehabilitation of Well 7 in light of the announcement made by Director Dowdy relating to TPU's water rates. Assistant Director /City Engineer SeIle responded to questions asked by Mayor Lewis regarding the net affect to water supply if the City uses Well 6 and Well 2 and abandons Well 7. Rather than just focusing on just Fulmer Well -field Assistant Director /City Engineer SeIle suggested a review of the entire water system be completed to Page 8 of 11 PW.1 Page 19 of 465 develop a balanced policy concerning water purchase versus local supply. The Committee, Mayor Lewis and staff discussed how to proceed. Chairman Wagner asked for a matrix outlining the various water rights. In response to questions asked by Member Osborne, Utilities Engineer Repp discussed the causes of the conflicts between Wells 2 and 6. Utilities Engineer Repp answered questions asked by Chairman Wagner regarding the Comprehensive Water Plan update process and modeling. The Committee agrees that staff should proceed with completing the feasibility assessment and temporary work on Well 6. F. Capital Project Status Report (Gaub) Item 9 — CP1225 — West Valley Highway Preservation — 15th NW to 37th NW: Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that the paving and striping are complete and there is just clean up and some concrete work remaining, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner. Item 11 — CP1120 — Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools Improvements: Chairman Wagner asked for the project's status. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) is in the process of relocating a pole a then the signal work may begin. Item 12 — CP0912 — Citywide Guardrail Improvements: Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that there is no conflict between the guardrails and the new development on Kersey Way. Item 15 — CP1222 — Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements: Member Osborne asked about the status of the turn signals on Auburn Way S and Cross Street. Transportation Manager Para answered that there is no project schedule yet. Assistant City Engineer Gaub added that the project is currently soliciting bids and will open later this week and staff will not have a schedule from the contractor until mid to late December. Item 17 & Item 18 — Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements: Mayor Lewis stated that there will be large display maps and each individual will have copies of the maps at the meeting Page 9 of 11 PW.1 Page 20 of 465 with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) on Tuesday, in response to a question asked by Chairman Wagner. Item 36 — CP1224 — 2013 Local Street Reconstruction: Member Osborne asked if what the additional costs are for the added sidewalk work being done on H Street. Assistant City Engineer Gaub stated that she does not have that specific cost, but the amount is within the contingency for the project. G. Significant Infrastructure Projects by Others - Public Works Status Report (Gaub) This item was not discussed. H. Action Tracking Matrix (Dowdy) Vice -Chair Peloza stated that Item G can be removed from the matrix, as the item is complete. I. Ordinance No. 6490* (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Repealing Section 3.04.265 of the Auburn City Code Relating to the Golf Course Fund This item was discussed following Discussion Item C. Finance Director Coleman explained that Ordinance No. 6490 repeals the code that established the fund for the Golf Course. The City intends to bring the Golf Course fund and associated debt back to the General Fund. Finance Director distributed an amendment to Ordinance No. 6474, which includes the abolishment of the Golf Course fund as well as the associated debt services fund. Mayor Lewis noted that the Golf Course will become part of the Parks Department. Finance Director Coleman answered questions asked by Vice -Chair Peloza regarding the benefits of including the Golf Course in the General Fund. Chairman Wagner spoke about the possibility of increased use of the Golf Course for events. The Committee supported introduction and adoption of Ordinance No. 6490. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Public Works Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4:59 p.m. PW.1 Page 10 of 11 Page 21 of 465 PW.1 Approved this 2nd day of December, 2013. Rich Wagner, Chairman Jennifer Cusmir, Public Works Department Secretary Page 11 of 11 Page 22 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: November 18, 2013 Minutes Department: Administration Attachments: 11 -18 -2013 Minutes Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Partridge Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Staff: Item Number: FN.1 FN.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 23 of 465 Finance Committee November 18, 2013 - 5:30 PM Annex Conference Room 1 MINUTES iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiik CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Largo Wales called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in Annex Conference Room 1 located on the second floor of the City Hall Annex located at One East Main Street in Auburn. A. Roll Call Vice Chair Largo Wales and Member Holman were present. Chair John Partridge was excused. Officials and staff members present included: Mayor Peter B. Lewis, Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, Human Resources and Risk Management Director Brenda Heineman, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Advisor to the Mayor Michael Hursh, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Economic Development Planner Bill Thomas, and City Clerk Danielle Daskam. Also present was Nancy Wyatt, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce. B. Announcements There was no announcement. C. Agenda Modifications Ordinance Nos. 6486 and 6490 were added to the agenda. II. CONSENT AGENDA A. November 4, 2013 Minutes Member Holman moved to approve the November 4, 2013 minutes as distributed. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 B. Claims Vouchers (Coleman) Claims voucher numbers 426053 through 426245 in the amount of $4,878,842.98 and two wire transfers in the amount of $13,506.75 and dated November 18, 2013. Member Holman moved to approve the claims and payroll vouchers. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 FN.1 Page 1 of 6 Page 24 of 465 C. Payroll Vouchers (Coleman) Payroll check numbers 534225 through 534255 in the amount of $879,171.23 electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,231,319.79 for a grand total of $2,110,491.02 for the period covering October 31,2013 to November 13, 2013. See claims vouchers above for approval of payroll vouchers. D. Contract 12 -18 City Hall Remodel, Phase I (Hursh) City Council to accept Final Pay Estimate for City Hall Remodel -Phase I, Contract No. 12 -18, Lincoln Construction, Inc. Economic Development Planner Bill Thomas presented the request for Final Pay Estimate and acceptance of the City Hall Remodel -Phase 1 Project, Contract No. 12 -18, to Lincoln Construction, Inc. The City Hall Remodel -Phase 1 Project included the renovation of the City Hall second floor including all construction, electrical, heating ventilation and cooling, plumbing systems and fixtures, furniture, and equipment to accommodate the relocation of the offices of Mayor, City Council, Human Resources, and conference rooms. In response to questions from Committee members, Mr. Thomas explained that the second floor space had been originally designed for another use and ultimately became the Mayor, City Council, and Human Resources offices. Mr. Thomas reported that the second phase of the renovation is approximately 60 percent designed. The second phase includes space for the Legal Department, lobby improvements, and the wellness center. Member Holman moved to approve Final Pay Estimate for Contract No. 12 -18 and accept the project. Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 III. ORDINANCES A. Ordinance No. 6475 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, establishing the levy for regular property taxes by the City of Auburn for collection in 2014 for general City operational purposes in the amount of $15,792,046.00 Finance Director Coleman presented Ordinance No. 6475. Ordinance No. 6475 sets the property tax levy for 2014. Member Holman moved to approve and forward Ordinance No. 6475 to full Council for consideration. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 FN.1 Page 2 of 6 Page 25 of 465 B. Ordinance No. 6486 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Section 2.63.160 of the Auburn City code relating to sick leave Human Resources and Risk Management Director Heineman presented Ordinance No. 6486, which revises the City Code to permit any Mayor of Auburn to cash out their sick leave. There are some employees, depending on their date of employment, who receive up to 100 percent of their accrued and unused sick leave upon their separation. Due to the unusual job and time demands on the office of the Mayor, it is appropriate that separate accommodation be made for the Office of Mayor in terms of payment for accrued unused sick leave. In response to a question from Member Holman, Finance Director Coleman responded that the accrued sick leave is 712 hours. Member Holman moved to approve Ordinance No. 6486 and forward it to Council for consideration. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 C. Ordinance No. 6490 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, repealing Section 3.04.265 of the Auburn City Code relating to the Golf Course Fund Finance Director Coleman presented Ordinance No. 6490, which repeals Auburn City Code Section 3.04.265 relating to the Golf Course Fund. The Golf Course, and its debt, would be funded by the General Fund and become part of the Parks Department. Member Holman spoke in favor of the Ordinance. Vice Chair Wales expressed concern that the accountability of the golf course will be lost as part of the Parks Department. Mayor Lewis assured the Committee that the same financial accountability that is available today will be available in the future. Member Holman moved to approve and forward Ordinance No. 6490 to the full Council for consideration this evening. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED. 2 -0 IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. September 2012 Financial Report (Coleman) Finance Director Coleman presented the September 2013 Financial Report. Finance Director Coleman noted that most of the revenues have exceeded budget. FN.1 Page 3 of 6 Page 26 of 465 There was brief discussion regarding admission taxes. Director Coleman explained that admission taxes are remitted quarterly. B. Ordinance No. 6481 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6456, Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, and Ordinance No. 6473, authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Finance Director Coleman presented Ordinance No. 6481, Budget Amendment No. 5, which is the 2013 year -end budget amendment. The budget amendment includes a $2 million transfer from the General Fund to the Cumulative Reserve Fund, increases the Sewer -Metro waste water revenues and expenses by $700,000, and increases the Solid Waste Utility revenues and expenses by $300,000. Finance Director Coleman directed the Committee's attention to the Budget Amendment memorandum for further details. Most of the amendments relate to grants, proceeds from the sale of Suite 380 at the Annex, and Public Works projects. Member Holman moved to approve Ordinance No. 6481 and forward it to the full Council for consideration on December 2, 2013, with any administrative changes as needed. Vice Chair Wales concurred. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 2 -0 C. Ordinance No. 6474 (Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending Ordinance No. 6432, the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget Ordinance, as amended by Ordinance No. 6456 Ordinance No. 6462, Ordinance No. 6472, Ordinance No. 6473, Ordinance No. 6481, and authorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Budget as set forth in Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" Finance Director Coleman presented Ordinance No. 6474, Budget Amendment No. 6, which is also referred to as the mid -term budget correction. The Ordinance adjusts the 2014 beginning fund balance, Sewer -Metro waste water revenue and expense changes, a grant from the Department of Ecology, the purchase of the Public Works software, the Isaac Evans Park project, and the purchase of a police vehicle. The mid -term budget adjustment also includes adjustments previously approved by Council. D. Resolution No. 5009 (Coleman) A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute an agreement for services between the City of Auburn and the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to operate a visitor information center, promote tourism Page 4 of 6 FN.1 Page 27 of 465 awareness within the City and to provide services associated with supporting the City's economic development efforts Committee members reviewed Resolution No. 5009, which would approve the annual contract with the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to operate a visitor information center, promote tourism awareness, and provide services supporting the City's economic development efforts. Director Coleman briefly reviewed the components of the contract. Nancy Wyatt, Chamber President and Chief Executive Officer, was in attendance to answer any questions related to the Chamber's annual report of its services to the City under its existing contract for services. Ms. Wyatt stated the full contract is $85,000. Any expenses for postage and printing for tourism activities is paid through the Tourism Board budget. There was brief discussion regarding the Chamber's role in economic development, business, and tourism activities. Ms. Wyatt stated the Chamber's mission statement includes advancing business, promoting the economy, and connecting communities. Vice Chair Wales inquired regarding the Chamber's ranking of political candidates in debates. Ms. Wyatt stated the Chamber's ranking of political candidates at the local level is based on the Chamber's issues only. E. Medicare Advantage for LEOFF I Retirees (Heineman) Human Resources and Risk Management Director Heineman presented the Committee with handouts regarding the transition of LEOFF 1 Medicare - eligible retirees to the Medicare Advantage Plan, which is offered through the Association of Washington Cities effective January 1, 2014. Currently 46 of the 59 LEOFF 1 retirees are Medicare eligible. The annual savings in premium payments is over $270,000.00. An informational meeting with the LEOFF 1 Medicare - eligible retirees will be held on Thursday to review the Medicare Advantage Plan. Some of the advantages of the Plan include: claims only need to be submitted to Regence because they will be responsible for all administrative and operations costs associated with providing coverage, $0 copay for generic and some brand name prescriptions, eligibility for Silver Sneakers exercise program. V. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting adjourned at 6:22 p.m. APPROVED this day of , 2013. FN.1 Page 5 of 6 Page 28 of 465 FN.1 John Partridge, Chair Danielle Daskam, City Clerk Page 6 of 6 Page 29 of 465 W SI'III ; r 11N AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: November 18, 2013 Regular Meeting Minutes Department: Administration Attachments: 11 -18 -2013 Minutes Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Staff: Item Number: CA.A CA.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 30 of 465 ‘V/0111N N I. CALL TO ORDER CA.A City Council Meeting November 18, 2013 - 7:30 PM Auburn City Hall MINUTES A. Flag Salute Mayor Peter B. Lewis called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and led those in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance. B. Roll Call City Councilmembers present: Rich Wagner, Nancy Backus, Bill Peloza, Largo Wales, Wayne Osborne, and John Holman. Councilmember John Partridge was excused. Department directors and staff members present: Public Works Director Dennis Dowdy, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Multimedia Manager Dana Hinman, Economic Development Planner Bill Thomas, Police Commander Mark Caillier, Economic Development Manager Doug Lein, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber, Advisor to the Mayor Michael Hursh and Deputy City Clerk Shawn Campbell. C. Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations 1. Boards and Commissions Appointments City Council to confirm the following appointments to the Auburn Junior City Council for two -year terms expiring August 31, 2015 Mayor Lewis provided the background on forming the City of Auburn Junior City Council. Mayor Lewis invited each Junior City Councilmember present to come forward. He read the Certificate of Appointment and presented the certificates to the new Junior City Councilmembers. Deputy Mayor Backus moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to confirm the appointment of Sydney Campbell, Tyler Cushing, Anton Mahoney and Dalton Hands to a two -year term as a Junior City Council Member expiring August 31, 2015. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 Page 1 of 8 Page 31 of 465 2. Boards and Commissions Appointments City Council to confirm the following appointments to the Auburn Junior City Council for a one -year term expiring August 31, 2014. Deputy Mayor Backus moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to confirm the appointment of Allison Hand, Mauricio Martinez- Torres, Olivia Thomas, Mary Riel to a one -year term as a Junior City Council Member expiring August 31, 2014. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 3. Washington Committee of Employer Support of Guard and Reserve Mayor Lewis read and presented a proclamation recognizing the National Guard for their support to the country. Randy McConnell from the Employers Support of the Guard Association thanked Mayor Lewis and the City for their support of the National Guard. Randy McConnell presented the Mayor with a Certificate of Appreciation for the support the City gives the National Guard. 4. Pioneer Elementary School Pioneer Elementary School Principal Debra Gray explained that the entrance to Pioneer Elementary School had an area that flooded and the students were not able to get to school without going through deep standing water. The school reached out to the City for help and the City of Auburn responded by replacing a section of the storm drain that was broken and no longer worked. Marissa Lams, a first grade teacher at Pioneer presented the Council with a video depicting the event and thanked the City and the Public Works Department. Principal Gray also asked the Council and the audience in helping Pioneer Elementary School win a contest to renovate the school by texting Pioneer Elementary WA to 99222. D. Agenda Modifications Ordinance No. 6486 and Ordinance No. 6490 were added to the agenda. II. CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE A. Public Hearings There was no public hearing. CA.A Page 2 of 8 Page 32 of 465 B. Audience Participation This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form provided. Elam Anderson, 301 23rd Street SE, Auburn Mr. Anderson spoke about the effect war has on the citizens of the United States of America. Dalton Hands, 22434 SE Auburn Black Diamond Road, Auburn Mr. Hands spoke about ideas on how to help teens get off the streets and back to school. He suggested providing additional after school activities and more academic help for students to help ensure success. Virgina Haugen , 2503 R Street SE, Auburn Ms.Haugen spoke about concerns she has regarding the homeless, high crime areas, derelict buildings and business license requirements in Auburn. Ms. Haugen provided the Deputy City Clerk with public records request at the meeting for the total cost of the Phase 1 Remodel of City Hall. Darice Johnson, Cascade Middle School, Auburn Ms. Johnson stated she is the Vice Principal at Cascade Middle School.She thanked the Council for creating Junior City Council. She feels the Junior City Council is a great platform for students to get involved in their community. Mayor Lewis requested any citizen who sees items in the City that need repair or investigation to please contact the City and report the issue. Mayor Lewis acknowledged the City has a problem with homelessness the same as other cities. The City of Auburn is striving to help the homeless in the area. C. Correspondence There was no correspondence for Council review. III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Municipal Services Chair Peloza reported the Municipal Services Committee met November 12, 2013. The Committee discussed the renewal of the Airport Management Contract, Ordinance No. 6475, Ordinance No. 6481, Ordinance No. 6465, and the Redflex photo enforcement program. The next regular meeting of the Municipal Services Committee is scheduled for November 25, 2013 at 3:30 p.m. Planning & Community Development CA.A Page 3 of 8 Page 33 of 465 CA.A B. Chair Backus reported the Planning and Community Development Committee met November 12, 2013. The Committee received an annual presentation from the Hearing Examiner. The Committee discussed Ordinance No. 6481, Ordinance No. 6475 and the shared student housing rental policy. The Committee also received presentations on the Auburn School Districts School Impact Fee allocations, the Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan update, the Comprehensive Stormwater Plan update, the amendments to the Flood Hazard Area, the 2013 Comprehensive Plan update, and the Facilities Plan update. The next regular meeting of the Planning and Community Development Committee is scheduled for November 25, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. C. Public Works Chair Wagner reported the Public Works Committee met this afternoon at 3:30. The Committee approved a right of way use permit, consultant agreements for updates to the Sewer Comprehensive Plan, the Comprehensive Water Plan and the Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan, final pay estimate for the 2013 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project. The Committee discussed Resolution No. 5009, Ordinance No. 6481, Ordinance No. 6474, Ordinance No. 6490, and the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment recommendations. The next regular meeting of the Public Works Committee is scheduled for December 2, 2013 at 3:30 p.m. D. Finance Vice Chair Wales reported the Finance Committee met this evening at 5:30. The Committee reviewed claims vouchers in the amount of approximately $4.8 million and payroll vouchers in the amount of $2,110,491.02. The Committee also forwarded to full Council for consideration Ordinance No. 6475, Ordinance No. 6486 and Ordinance No. 6490. The Committee discussed the September 2012 Financial Report, Ordinance No. 6481, Ordinance No. 6474, Resolution No. 5009 and the Medicare Advantage Program for LEOFF I retirees. The next regular meeting of the Finance Committee meeting is scheduled for December 2, 2013. E. Les Gove Community Campus The next Les Gove Community Campus Committee meeting is December 4, 2013. F. Council Operations Committee Chair Backus reported the Council Operations Committee met this evening at 5:00. The Committee met the Junior City Council Page 4 of 8 Page 34 of 465 candidates and discussed the role of the Junior City Councilmembers. The Junior City Council will meet the third Monday of every month at 5:00 p.m.The next regular meeting of the Council Operations Committee is scheduled for December 2, 2013 at 5:00 p.m. IV. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed. A. Minutes of the November 4, 2013 Regular Meeting B. Claims Vouchers (Partridge /Coleman) Claims voucher numbers 426053 through 426245 in the amount of $4,878,842.98 and two wire transfers in the amount of $13,506.75 and dated November 18, 2013. C. Payroll Vouchers (Partridge /Coleman) Payroll check numbers 534225 through 534255 in the amount of $879,171.23 electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,231,319.79 for a grand total of $2,110,491.02 for the period covering October 31,2013 to November 13, 2013. D. Public Works Project No. CP1310 (Wagner /Dowdy) City Council approve final pay estimate No. 2 to small works contract No. 13 -14 in the amount of $7,872.50 and accept construction of project No. CP1310, 2013 Arterial & Collector Crack Seal Project E. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -438 (Wagner /Dowdy) City Council approve Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -438 with Brown and Caldwell, Inc. for the update of the Sewer Comprehensive Plan F. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -439 (Wagner /Dowdy) City Council approve Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -439 with Carollo Engineers, Inc. for Comprehensive Water System Plan G Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -440 (Wagner /Dowdy) City Council approve Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -440 with Brown and Caldwell, Inc. for the update of the Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan H. Airport Management Contract (Peloza /Coleman) City Council approve a contract for airport management services with Aviation Management Group, LLC. I. Contract 12 -18 City Hall Remodel, Phase I (Partridge /Hursh) City Council to accept Final Pay Estimate for City Hall Remodel - Phase I, Contract No. 12 -18, Lincoln Construction, Inc. Deputy Mayor Backus moved and Councilmember Wagner seconded to approve the Consent Agenda. Page 5 of 8 CA.A Page 35 of 465 The Consent Agenda includes minutes, claims and payroll vouchers, public works projects, and contracts. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS There was no unfinished business. VI. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business. VII. ORDINANCES CA.A A. Ordinance No. 6475 (Partridge /Coleman) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, establishing the levy for regular property taxes by the City of Auburn for collection in 2014 for general City operational purposes in the amount of $15,792,046.00 Councilmember Wales moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6475. Councilmember Wales said Ordinance No. 6475 sets the amount for the tax levy that the City is able to collect for 2014. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 B. Ordinance No. 6486 An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending section 2.63.160of the Auburn City Code relating to sick leave Councilmember Wales moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6486. Councilmember Wales reported Ordinance No. 6486 allows the Mayor to receive 100 percent payment for unused sick leave. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 C. Ordinance No. 6490 An Ordinance of The City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, repealing Section 3.04.265 of the Auburn City Code relating to the Golf Course Fund Councilmember Wales moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6490. Page 6 of 8 Page 36 of 465 Councilmember Wales explained Ordinance No. 6490 makes the Golf Course a part of the Parks, Art and Recreation Department. The Golf Course will no longer be an enterprise fund. The funding for the Golf Course will come from the General Fund. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0 VIII. REPORTS At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated with their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations. A. From the Council Deputy Mayor Backus reported she attended the Pioneer Elementary School presentation to the Public Works team who fixed the road in front of the school. She also attended the Veterans Day celebration events. Councilmember Wagner reported he attended the Arts Commission meeting, the Veterans Day events and the National League of Cities Conference. Councilmember Wales reported she attended the National League of Cities Conference. Councilmember Holman reported he attended the National League of Cities Conference. Councilmember Peloza reported he attended the Water Resource Inventory Area(WIRA) 9 meeting, the King County Solid Waste Advisory Committee meeting and the National League of Cities Conference. Councilmember Osborne reported he attended the LEOFF Board meeting, the briefing on new medical insurance for LEOFF I retirees, the Veterans Day activities and the National League of Cities Conference. B. From the Mayor Mayor Lewis reported that at the Sound Cities and Regional Caucus the founding member put together a ten year plan to end homelessness in King County. The City of Auburn is working with the homeless to help them find a place to live. Mayor Lewis thanked all the people who work to help those who are in need. Mayor Lewis attended the Veterans Day activities including the largest sanctioned parade west of the Mississippi River. CA.A Page 7 of 8 Page 37 of 465 IX. EXECUTIVE SESSION At 8:55 p.m., Mayor Lewis recessed the meeting for a five minute intermission and then to executive session for approximately 20 minutes to discuss pending /potential litigation and property acquisition pursuant to RCW 42.30.110(1)(i) and 42.30.110(1)(c). Department directors and staff required for the executive session included: City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Director Dowdy and Economic Development Manager Lien. It was indicated that no potential action by the Council will occur following the executive session. The executive session was extended at 9:17 p.m., for 20 minutes and 9:41 p.m., fir five minutes At 9:45 p.m. Mayor Lewis reconvened the regular meeting. X. ADJOURNMENT CA.A There being no further business to come before the City Council, the meeting adjourned at 9:45 p.m. APPROVED this 2nd day of December, 2013. Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Shawn Campbell, Deputy City Clerk Page 8 of 8 Page 38 of 465 WA S I' I ; r AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Claims Vouchers Date: November 25, 2013 Department: Attachments: Budget Impact: Administration No Attachments Available $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Claims voucher numbers 426246 through 426448 in the amount of $2,228,919.51 and one wire transfer in the amount of $546.00 and dated December 2, 2013. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Partridge Staff: Coleman Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: CA.B CA.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 39 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Payroll Vouchers Date: November 25, 2013 Department: Attachments: Budget Impact: Administration No Attachments Available $0 Administrative Recommendation: City Council to approve Payroll Vouchers Background Summary: Payroll check numbers 534256 through 534329 in the amount of $386,209.32 electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,325,225.31 for a grand total of $1,711,434.63 for the period covering November 14, 2013 to November 27, 2013. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Partridge Staff: Coleman Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: CA.0 CA.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 40 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Agenda Subject: Annual On -Call Agreements Department: Public Works Attachments: On -Call Service and Consulting Contracts List Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council approve the Annual On -Call Professional Service Agreements and Amendments for 2014. Background Summary: The annual on -all agreements are used to supplement the City's staff resources or to perform specialized services not available within the City. Having these resources available provides the City with the flexibility to complete small tasks or projects in an efficient and timely manner as they are needed through out the year. Each agreement is written to provide the total "Not to Exceed" amount for the year, however, actual expenditures under each agreement are authorized by the City through specific Task Orders. Each Task Order provides a specific Scope of Work, Schedule, and Budget for the work to be completed by the consultant or service provider. All expenditures associated with these agreements will be in conformance with authorized budgets for the related projects or tasks. Attached is a list of the existing agreements and their proposed amendment amounts and the proposed new agreements and their "Not to Exceed" amount for 2014. Some existing agreements require a time extension only as there is sufficient balance remaining in the current agreements to carry out the anticipated 2014 work. Reviewed by Council Committees: Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: CA.D CA.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 41 of 465 City of Auburn On -Call Service and Consulting Contracts The City currently engages in several On -Call Annual Professional Service and Service Contracts for a variety of purposes. These services are used to supplement the existing City resources when necessary, and to improve the City's timeliness and flexibility for meeting both project and development demands. The following is a description of the current services proposed for 2014. Some contracts are proposed as extensions of the current contracts and several are new contracts for 2014. The highlighted number shown below is the amount being authorized with this action. Professional Engineering, Survey and Architechtural Services Contract Number Firm Name 2013 2014 P oposed Expenditures/ Encumbrances Remaining Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Contract Amount Geotechnical Engineering The consultant performs geotechnical investigations and assists with the analysis and management of contaminated materials as needed. AG -C -356 New Agreement Terracon Shannon & Wilson $30,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $50,000 Signal /Roadway Design This consultant may perform dengineering design related to roadway improvments and traffic signal and lighting system designs. AG -C -411 New Agreement Parametrix KPG, Inc $32,000 N/A $68,000 N/A $0 N/A $68,000 $50,000 Utility Design This consultant may perform engineering design related to utility facilities and systems. AG -C -412 Jacobs Engineering g g $60,000 $40,000 $60,000 $100,000 Structural Engineering This consultant may perform structural design and evaluations related to capital projects. New Agreement KPFF N/A N/A N/A $25,000 Construction Management This consultant may provide additional staffing resources for construction management, administration and inspection services as requested by the City. AG -C -413 Harris and Associates $50,000 $0 $125,000 $125,000 Land Survey The Land Survey consultant may perform topographic, design, construction and boundary surveys as necessary to supplement the City survey Crew. New Agreement New Agreement Parametrix David Evans and Associates $21,500 $17,870 N/A N/A N/A N/A $40,000 $30,000 Wetland and Environmental The wetland and environmental services provided by the consultant may include environmental permitting, wetland delineation, wetland mitigation development and wetland system monitoring. New Agreement The Watershed Company $15,000 N/A N/A $30,000 Landscape Architecture The consultant may provide services related to the planning and construction for park facility projects and /or Public Works projects as necessary. New Agreement Robert W. Droll Landscape ArchitE $0 N/A N/A $30,000 Transportation Modeling The consultant may provide modeling services related to planning and design for the City's transporation systems that may be related to both capital and development projects as well as general system needs. AG -C -410 Fehr and Peers $4,100 $13,690 $0 $13,690 NPDES Support This consultant provides support as requested by the City for implmentation and reporting required by the City's NPDES Phase 2 Permit. AG -C -398 Brown and Caldwell $51,284 $13,211 $50,000 $63,211 Water Modeling The consultant may provide modeling services related to planning and design for the City's water system that may be related to both capital and development projects as well as general system needs. AG -C -363 Carollo Engineers $123,962 $41,897 $90,000 $131,897 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water Modeling The consultant may provide modeling services related to planning and design for the City's sanitary sewer and storm drainage systems that may be related to both capital and development projects as well as general system needs. AG -C -362 Brown and Caldwell $85,771 $53,588 $50,000 $103,588 Other Services Contract Number Firm Name 2013 2014 Proposed Expenditures/ Encumbrances Remaining Contract Amount Amendment Amount Total Contract Amount Appraisal and Appraisal Review These consultants provide appraisal services for property and right -of -way valuation for all departments within the City. Where necessary, the consultants may also provide appraisal review services. AG -S -054 AG -S -055 The Granger Company Appraisal Group of the Northwest $4,000 $17,000 $21,000 $8,000 $4,000 $17,000 $25,000 $25,000 Wetland Invasive Plant Species Maintenance Perform spraying of invasive plant species in and adjacent to wetland areas. Potential areas for spray treatments include the Mohawk Plastics Wetland Mitigation site, the S. 277th St Reconstruction Wetland Mitigation sites, the A Street NW Mitigation site, the Auburn Environmental Park and the Inter -Urban Trail. New Agreement Firm Selection is in process. $62,500 N/A N/A $70,000 CA.D 2014 Annual Consulant Summary.xls Page 42 of 465 WA S I' I o , I AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. EM0902 Department: Public Works Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Final Pay Esimates Vicinity Map Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 21, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council approve Final Pay Estimate No. 2 to Small Works Contract No. 13 -13 in the amount of $14,692.78 and accept construction of Project No. EM0902, Auburn Valley Drive -In Site Restoration. Background Summary: During the Fall of 2012, the temporary flood control barriers were removed from the Auburn Valley Drive -In property and a number of disturbed areas were restored back to their original condition, but due to the poor weather and soft ground condition the restoration process was suspended. This project finished restoring the Auburn Valley Drive -In property back to the original condition. A project budget contingency of $768,350.67 remains in the King County Flood Control District fund and $256,117.56 remains in the King County Flood Control District Opportunity Fund. Reviewed by Council Committees: Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: CA.E CA.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 43 of 465 BUDGET STATUS SHEET Project No: EM0902 Project Title: Auburn Valley Drive -In Site Restoration Project Manager: Kim Truong Initiation Date: 07/02/12 Advertisement Date: 08/15/13 Award Date: 09/03/13 Date: November 20, 2013 O Initiation /Consultant Agreement O Permission to Advertise O Contract Award Change Order Approval C) Contract Final Acceptance The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) Funding Prior Years 2012 2013 Total King County Flood Control District (KCFCD) 0 787,110 818,410 1,605,520 KCFCD Opportunity Fund 0 262,370 272,804 535,174 Total 0 1,049,480 1,091,214 2,140,694 Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) Activity Prior Years 2012 2013 Total Design and Construction Engineering - City Costs 0 72,909 19,276 92,184 Closed Construction Contract 0 972,862 50,059 972,862 Construction Contract 0 0 69,975 69,975 Line Item Changes 0 0 ('iii 550) (22 550) Other 3,710 45 3,755 Total 0 1,049,480 66,745 1,116,226 King County Flood Control District Budget Status KCFCD Opportunity Fund Budget Status Prior Years 2012 2013 Total * KCFCD Funds Budgeted () 0 (787,110) (818,410) (1,605,520) KCFCD Funds Needed 0 787,110 50,059 837,169 * KCFCD Fund Project Contingency () 0 0 (768,351) (768,351) KCFCD Funds Required 0 0 0 0 KCFCD Opportunity Fund Budget Status * ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. CA.E Page 44 of 465 Prior Years 2012 Future Years Total *Opportunity Funds Budgeted () 0 (262,370) (272,804) (535,174) Opportunity Funds Needed 0 262,370 16,686 279,056 *432 Fund Project Contingency () 0 0 (256,118) (256,118) 432 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 * ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. CA.E Page 44 of 465 CITY OF AUBURN EM0902 PAY ESTIMATE #2 & FINAL CO. NO. 13 -13 Auburn Valley Drive -In Site Restoration SCHEDULE A: Site Improvements ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE QUANTITY TOTAL QUANTITY PERIOD QUANTITY UNIT TYPE UNIT COST TOTAL COST PERIOD COST PERCENT EST. QTY. 1 Minor Changes 1 0.80 0.80 Eq. Adj. 5000.00 $ 4,009.87 $ 4,009.87 80% 2 Mobilization 1 1 LS 6500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ - 100% 3 Traffic Control Labor (Min. Bid $38.00 per hour) 8 0 HR 38.00 5000.00 5500.00 $ - $ - 0% Clearing and Grubbing 1 1 LS LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,500.00 $ - $ - 100% 5 Removal of Structures and Obstructions 1 1 100% 6 Surface Grading 160 92 42 HR 150.00 $ 13,800.00 [ $ 6,300.00 58% 7 Crushed Surfacing Top Course 350 0 TON 17.00 $ - $ - 0% 8 PVC Drain Pipe 6 -inch Diam. 400 276 LF 7.50 $ 2,070.00 $ - 69% 9 Area Drain Type 50 7 2 EA 430.00 $ 860.00 $ - 29% 10 Temporary Water Pollution /Erosion Control 1 0.97 0.97 Eq. Adj. 2000.00 $ 1,930.20 $ 1,930.20 97% 11 Mowing and Spraying 13000 13000 6500 SY 0.28 $ 3,640.00 $ 1,820.00 100% CA.E h:lprojlpelEM0902 PE.xls SCHEDULE TOTAL $ 14,060.07 Period Dates Begin: Sept. 21, 2013 End: Oct. 20, 2013 Page 45 of 465 1of3 11/4/2013 at 11:04 AM CITY OF AUBURN EM0902, Auburn Valley Drive-In Site Restoration PROJECT SUMMARY CO. NO. 13 -13 PAY ESTIMATE #2 & FINAL Original Contract Contract Change Amount Orders Total Payment This Period Percent/Contract SCHEDULE A: Site Improvements Contract $ 63,904.00 $ $ 43,310.07 $ 14,060.07 Sales Tax (+9.5 %) $ 6,070.88 $ $ 4,114.46 $ 1,335.71 Retainage ( -5 %) $ (2,165.50) $ (703.00) SCHEDULE TOTAL $ 69,974.88 $ - $ 45,259.03 $ 14,692.78 TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT TO DATE (including Sales Tax) TOTAL PAYMENT TO CONTRACTOR PAYMENT DUE CONTRACTOR: CA.E Period Dates Begin: Sept. 21, 2013 End: Oct. 20, 2013 $ 47,424.53 $ 45,259.03 $ 14,692.78 $ 14,692.78 Page 46 of 465 h:lprojlpelEM0902 PE.xls 2 of 3 11/4/2013 at 11:04 AM 68% CITY OF AUBURN CO. NO. 13-13 EM0902 Auburn Valley Drive-In Site Restoration PAY ESTIMATE # 2 & FINAL CONTRACTOR: Henderson Partners 11302 Burnham Dr. NW Gig Harbor, WA, 98332 Phone: 253-851-5896 The undersigned has reviewed and approved this final pay estimate. I agree that it is a true and correct statement showing all monies due me from the City of Auburn under this contract; that I have carefully examined the final pay estimate estimate and understand it and that I hereby release the City of Auburn from any and all claims of whatsoever nature which I may have, arising out of this contract, which are not set forth in this estimate. PAYMENT DUE TO CONTRACTOR = 14,692.78 Signatures: ?fr, Contractor Date Inspector Date f/ 4/ Project Manager Date City Engineer Date CA.E hAprojlpelEM0902 PE.xls Page 47 of 465 3 of 3 11/4/2013 at 11:05 AM 1 NE NORTHERN NW. z 0 z... z 42nd ST NE B PL NW 37th 40th ST N W z ST NE 35th PROJECT LOCATION 4IVER MHP ( CITY OF CA.t RN WASHINGTON AUBURN VALLEY DRIVE -IN SITE RESTORATION VICINITY MAP AUGUST 2013 NOT TO SCALE Page 4817 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Public Works Project No. CP1222 Department: Public Works Attachments: Budget Status Sheet Bid Tabulation Summary Vicinity Map Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council award Contract No. 13 -15 to Valley Electric Co. on their low bid of $351,662.00 for Project No. CP1222, Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Background Summary: The Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvement project will construct various safety improvements at the following locations: Auburn Way North /4th Street NE Auburn Way N /1st Street NE Auburn Way N/E Main St Auburn Way S /2nd Street SE Auburn Way S /4th Street SE Auburn Ave NE /1st Street NE A Street SE /2nd Street SE A Street SE /3rd Street SE A Street SE /6th Street SE A Street SE /17th Street SE A Street SE /29th Street SE C Street SW /8th Street SW C Street SW /15 St SW These improvements will include flashing yellow arrow left turn operations, auxiliary signal heads, vehicle detection systems, signal head backplates with yellow reflective yellow tape and new LED signal head lamps. A project budget contingency of $9,027.00 remains in the 102 Arterial Street Fund Reviewed by Council Committees: CA.F AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 49 of 465 Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: CA.F CA.F AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 50 of 465 BUDGET STATUS SHEET Project No: CP1222 Project Title: Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Project Manager: Robert Lee Initiation Date: 9/25/2012 Advertisement Date: 10/29/2013 Award Date: O Project Initiation O Permision to Advertise • Contract Award O Change Order Approval O Contract Final Acceptance Date: November 21, 2013 The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets. Funds Budgeted (Funds Available) Funding Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total 102 Fund - Unrestricted 0 1,916 80,000 0 81,916 102 Fund - Federal Grant 0 0 400,000 0 400,000 Total 0 1,916 480,000 0 481,916 Estimated Cost (Funds Needed) Activity Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total Design Engineering - City Costs 0 1,916 37,462 0 39,378 Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Contract Bid *102 Fund Project Contingency () 0 351,662 (9,027) 351,662 Authorizied Contingency (15 %) 102 Funds Required 0 52,749 0 52,749 Construction Engineering - City Costs 29,100 29,100 Total 0 1,916 470,973 0 472,889 * ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. H: \PROJ \CP1222 - Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Imp \Budget \CP1222 BudgetStatusSheet.xls CA. F 1 of 1 Page 51 of 465 111-1 Arterial Jtreet tsuaget Jtatus Prior Years 2012 2013 Future Years Total *102 Funds Budgeted () 0 (1,916) (480,000) 0 (481,916) 102 Funds Needed 0 1,916 470,973 0 472,889 *102 Fund Project Contingency () 0 0 (9,027) 0 (9,027) 102 Funds Required 0 0 0 0 0 * ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available. H: \PROJ \CP1222 - Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Imp \Budget \CP1222 BudgetStatusSheet.xls CA. F 1 of 1 Page 51 of 465 Project Name: Prepared by: Bid Date: BID TABULATION BID TOTALS SUMMARY CP1222, Citywide Traffic Signal Improvements, Contract 13 -15 City of Auburn 11/21/13 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $ 435,000.00 AVERAGE BASIC BID AMOUNT: $ 369,449.97 BASIC BID SPREAD AMOUNT: $ 47,232.11 Basic BID Amount Spread $ Spread % LOW BIDDER: Valley Electric of Mt. Vernon $ 351,662.00 - $83,338.00 - 19.16% Second Bidder: Transportation Systems, Inc. $ 353,890.15 - $81,109.85 - 18.65% Total BID (No Tax Appicable) Valley Electric of Mt. Vernon $ 351,662.00 Transportation Systems, Inc. $ 353,890.15 Pride Electric, Inc. $ 365,855.00 Totem Electric of Tacoma $ 376,948.59 WestCoast Signal Non - Responsive VELA Electric $ 398,894.11 11/22/2013 (2:40 PM) h:l rojlbidtabs1CP1222 BT.xls CA.1- Page 52 of 465 3 8TH ST NE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5E 3201 i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Th-ST ...5..11... SL.. IE.,,,._.. • ..511.................. sTN sT NH _........ 3TN..S1 NE....... : : - x m m 4.TH 51.'.E,.,......... 4TH ST HE o z m 4 3159.T[....... m ri x 2ND ST „NE y r 2HA...ST.i E ... ..................2N9..51,..N.. v_ A • A i ; 1ST SI. N: ..1 :....SI...NE.r 4 g EMAIN ST m EMAIN ST ...... _4TN...21.NE... `a 3RD sr NE 2ND SINE_ 1ST ST NE R PL NE 1ST.ST SE.. - 1R 2ND ST SE ... 41!. sr.. S w ............................. r '5TH ST yAt � H P" 8TH S r 1R 8. 4. I.... SI... SE; .................................. ..................8TH ....ST... SE tg 9TH ST SE ..... 901...81 SE 14 12TH ST SE 12TH ST SE ...1319...117..; n1...5T. 15'. ST SE ..........1919 51..56.... 17TH ST SE C PL SE 17TH or 54 19TN....S1...56 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION 17TH SE SE 19191515E 1R 21ST 5T SE ,1.A 21ST 5T 1911...51..9 2on...1...11.8E% 22ND 5T ! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23R0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2411 5T SE 2471...51.. .2511...5.1.96 ............ ............................... c 26TH 5T SE 25TH 5T SE . ..............................y 2719 ST SE 2719 5T SE ....... ............................... 0 _..2811. s1..s..E..........28TH ST SE... ... o._P1 SE 29TH STSE 29TH ST SE r 111 ..... 25TH 5T 5E Bi 9 4 4 ♦R 16 A A 14 CTIN OF GA.F !As]Hl.I NGTON➢ 0 ]Il ]KS iID:E]PA ]Il T] Eil T CP1222 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Imp. VICINITY MAP Palms, - (AAP November, 2013 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6465 Department: Attachments: Parks /Art and Recreation Ordinance No. 6465 Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Planning and Community Development Committee to recommend that City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6465. Background Summary: See attached memorandum. Reviewed by Council Committees: Municipal Services, Planning And Community Development Councilmember: Backus Staff: Faber Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: ORD.A ORD.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 54 of 465 ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 6 5 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON ADDING NEW CHAPTER 2.22 TO THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO PARKS WHEREAS, In 1982 the Parks and Recreation Board ( "Board "), under the authority of Chapter 2.42 of the Auburn City Code, promulgated a Manual of Policies and Procedure, which has been updated over the years; and WHEREAS, in 2006, the City Council changed the role of the Board to that of an advisory body; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Manual be updated to reflect current Parks and Recreation Department practices, and that those portions of the Manual that affect the rights and obligations of the public be moved into the Auburn City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. New Chapter to City Code. That a new Chapter 2.22. be and the same hereby is added to the Auburn City Code to read as follows:. Chapter 2.22 PARK CODE Sections: 2.22.010 Chapter con_ stitutes park code. 2.22.020 Exercise of police power. 2.22.030 Definitions. 2.22.040 Permits — Assemblies, entertainment, etc. 2.22.050 Permits— Generally. 2.22.060 Reserved. 2.22.070 Destruction of park property. 2.22.080 Intoxicating liquors. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 1of10 ORD.A Page 55 of 465 2.22.090 Selling, advertising, soliciting. 2.22.100 Damage or removal of plants prohibited. 2.22.110 Disposal of trash. 2.22.1 20 Animal control. 2.22.130 Molesting or feeding animals. 2.22.140 Damage by animals. 2.22.150 Prohibitions as to boating, fishing and swimming. 2.22.160 Boats and beaches. 2.22.170 Fires. 2.22.180 Use of certain equipment. 2.22.190 Fireworks. 2.22.200 Vehicular standards. 2.22.205 Entrance fees. 2.22.210 Overnight use. 2.22.215 Parking fees required. 2.22.220 Opening and closing hours. 2.22.230 Emergency conditions. 2.22.250 Penalty for violations. 2.22.255 Violators may be required to leave park. 2.22.260 Severability. 222.010 Chapter constitutes park code. This chapter shall constitute the park code of the City of Auburn and may be cited as such. Conduct in all public parks shall be subject to all the general police regulations of the City of Auburn and not exclusively to the provisions of this chapter. 2.22.020 Exercise of police power. This chapter is hereby declared to be an exercise of the police power of the State of Washington and the City of Auburn for the public peace, health, safety, and welfare, and its provisions shall be liberally construed. 2.2.2.030 Definitions. The terms herein used, unless clearly contrary to or inconsistent with the context in which used, shall be construed as follows: A. "Civil infraction" has the meaning given that term by chapter 7.80 RCW, the Infraction Rules for Courts of Limited Jurisdiction and any local rule adopted thereto by the King County District Court at Auburn. B. "Director" means the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department. C. "Hearing Examiner" means the City's Hearing Examiner as set forth in Chapter 2.46ACC. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 2 of 10 ORD.A Page 56 of 465 D. "Park" means and includes all ,parks, squares, drives, piers, boulevards, golf courses, zoos, beaches, playgrounds, and recreation areas and facilities either developed or undeveloped, owned or under the management and control of the. City of Auburn. E. "Vehicle" shall have the meaning set forth in RCW 46.04.670 as currently enacted or hereafter amended and shall also include (1) trailers, including trailers designed to be towed behind any vehicle, and (2) motorized scooters and electric personal assistive mobility devices, as defined in Chapter 10.54 of this code. Wherever consistent with the context of this chapter, words in the present, past, or future tenses shall be construed to be interchangeable with each other, and words in the singular .number shall be construed to include the plural. 2.22.040 Permits — Assemblies, entertainment, etc. Any person who conducts or participates in any organized entertainment, demonstration, or public gathering, in any park shall obtain a permit from the Director. The procedure for application and consideration of permits for this purpose is as follows: A. Any person seeking to obtain a permit shall file a written application with the Director no later than one month prior to the date of the proposed use. The application shall state the purpose for which the park would be used, the date and time of the proposed use, the name of the park and the area thereof that would be used the anticipated number of persons who would be present, and such other information reasonably relating to the contemplated use as the Director may require; provided, however, that said Director may, for good cause shown, waive the one -month requirement for filing said application. B. W hen the proposed use is an exercise of rights protected by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution , or Article I, Sections 3, 4, 5, or 11 of the Washington Constitution, the application shall be processed promptly, without charging a fee for political or religious activities other than a fee based on the cost of processing the application, or imposing terms or conditions that infringe constitutional freedoms, and in a manner that respects the liberties of applicants and the public. C. In reviewing an application under this section, the Director shall consider the following conditions and standards: 1. The size of the park and any specialized purpose for which it is normally used or for which specialized facilities have been provided; 2. The location of the park, its aesthetic character and physical characteristics, and the character of the area surrounding it; 3. The anticipated size of the proposed use and assemblage, and activities associated with the event, including but not limited to the extent Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 3 of 10 ORD.A Page 57 of 465 of commercial activity, such as the sales of food, goods, and services; product advertising or promotion, or other business participation in the event; the use or application of any funds raised; 4. Policing problems that may arise from the intended use; 5. The effect of the intended use, including consideration of the noise to be expected, upon the adjacent area and its occupants; and 6. Other activities scheduled for the parks at the anticipated time and place. C. If, under the conditions set forth in subsection B of this section, the Director finds after an investigation that the safety, comfort, and convenience of the public in the use of the parks, or in the usage of the area adjacent to the park, would be unduly disturbed, he or she may deny the application, may impose restrictions upon the permit, or may issue a permit for a different date, time, park, or park area so as to alleviate such burden. The Director may issue a permit for use of the park during hours when the park is closed if he or she approves the application 2.22.050 Permits— Generally.. A. Permits, when required by this chapter, shall be applied. for through the Director unless otherwise provided. The granting or denying of permits shall be based upon the policies and standards set forth in this chapter. Where fees are required by the City for the issuance of permits, payment of such fees will be required before permits are issued. No fee shall be imposed when prohibited by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, or Article I, Section 3, 4, 5, or 11 of the Washington Constitution other than a fee based on the cost of processing the application. Political or religious activity intended primarily for the communication or expression of ideas shall be presumed to be a constitutionally protected event. Factors that may be considered in evaluating whether or not the fee applies include the nature of the event; the extent of commercial activity, such as the sales of food, goods, and services; product advertising or promotion, or other business participation in the event; the use or application of any funds raised; if part of an annual tradition or a series, previous events in the sequence; and the public perception of the event. B. All permits issued by the City shall be subject to other applicable city ordinances and Park regulations. The persons to whom such permits are issued ( "permittees ") shall be bound by said rules, regulations, and ordinances as fully as though the same were contained in such permits. A permittee shall be liable for any loss, damage, or injury sustained by any person by reason of the negligence of the permittee, as well as for any breach of such rules, regulations, or ordinances, to the person or persons so suffering damages or injury. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 4 of 10 ORD.A Page 58 of 465 C. Permits issued for musical acts or bands shall specify that the noise /sound level emitting from such act or band shall be no greater than 90 decibels at or beyond 50 feet. Any person claiming to have a permit from the City must produce and exhibit such permit upon the request of any authorized person who may desire to inspect the same. 2.22.060 Reserved. 2.22.070 Destruction of park property. It is unlawful for any person to damage or destroy any real or personal property within a park. 2.22.080 intoxicating liquors. The display, possession, or consumption of intoxicating liquors in any park is prohibited, except in particular areas or facilities which may be expressly designated from time to time by the Director. Every person who violates any provision of this section shall be guilty of a civil infraction and shall be fined not more than $100, which includes all statutory assessments. Whenever any person is stopped for a violation of this section, the officer may detain that person for a reasonable period of time necessary to identify the person and check for outstanding warrants. 2:22.090 Selling, advertising, soliciting. A. No person, except duly authorized concessionaires, and those having a specific permit, shall sell or offer for sale in any park any goods, refreshments, photographs, or other articles. B. Advertising by the distribution, carrying, erection, attachment, or use of a handbill, sign, or device of any kind in any park is prohibited. It is unlawful to place or erect a structure of any kind in any park. It shall be unlawful to carry on any activity whatsoever for compensation or renumeration except upon express authorization of the Director, including, but not limited to, the sale of goods, wares, merchandise, and services. 2.22.100 Damage or removal of plants prohibited. Unauthorized cutting, removal, or destruction of any turf, tree, plant, shrub, flower, or seaweed on park property is prohibited. While inside any park, having in one's possession any newly - plucked branch, tree, flower, plant, fungus (mushrooms, shelf fungus, etc.), algae or shrub without specific permission by the Director shall be presumptive evidence of such cutting, removal, or destruction. 2.22.110 Disposal of trash. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 5 of 10 ORD.A Page 59 of 465 No person shall throw or leave litter, garbage, trash, or yard waste in or at a park except in a receptacle provided for that purpose. No person shall deposit on any park property any household or commercial garbage, refuse, or rubbish which is brought as.such from any private property. The penalty for violation of this section shall be as provided in ACC 8.16. 2.22.120 Animal control. A. Unless in a designated off -leash area, dogs and cats must be on a leash no longer than eight feet or secured inside a vehicle. B. Animals are not allowed to enter wading pools, ponds, lakes, fountains, spraygrounds, or any play area designed to utilize water in any park unless in a designated off -leash area. C. Any person with an animal in his or her possession shall be responsible for the conduct of the animal. D. The provisions of this section do not apply to animals owned or maintained by the City of Auburn. E. The Director may prohibit animals, except for service animals as defined in RCW 9.91.170, from events and /or facilities within a park. F. All provisions of Title 6 of this code remain in full force and effect in all parks and may be enforced by any police officer or animal control officer. G. Any violation of this section is a class 1 civil infraction unless a different penalty is provided in Title 6 of this code. 2.22.130 Molesting or feeding animals. No person shall molest or attempt to touch any bird or wild animal in a park. It shall be unlawful for any person to give, offer, or attempt to give to any wild animal within the parks any tobacco, drink, or other article known to be dangerous or noxious to animals. It is also unlawful to feed any wild bird or animal in a park. 2.22.140 Damage by animals. Owners of animals damaging or destroying park property will be held liable for the full value of the property damaged or destroyed, in addition to impounding fees and the penalty imposed for violation of these provisions. 2.22.150 Prohibitions as to boating, fishing, and swimming. It is unlawful for any person to boat, fish, wade, swim, scuba dive, snorkel, or bathe in any park except in the places and at times designated by the Director. 2.22.160 Boats and beaches. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 6 of 10 ORD.A Page 60 of 465 No dock or any other structure shall be built upon any beach unless expressly authorized. No boat shall be kept for hire or private use upon any waters under the jurisdiction of the City of Auburn, except as expressly authorized by the Director. Launching of waterborne craft from any shoreline is prohibited, except for specifically designated areas or with specific permit issued by the Director. The launching of waterborne craft, as .provided in this section, shall be unlawful if the required fee, as determined by the Director, has not been paid. 2,22.170 Fires. A. Fires are prohibited except in picnic stoves or fire pits installed under the authority of the Director or in portable barbeques. Fires in any other facility or area are allowed only by special permit. Fires in picnic stoves or portable barbeques may only utilize propane or charcoal briquettes as fuel; all other fuel sources, including wood, are specifically prohibited. Portable barbeques may be utilized only for cooking food. Briquettes must be completely extinguished and properly disposed of or removed from the park. The Director may further restrict the use of barbeques within any park, provided that signs are installed to notify patrons of the restrictions. B. Fires are prohi bited during announced bum bans. 2.22.180 Use of certain equipment. A. It is unlawful for any person to use a slingshot, beanshooter, paintbail gun, air gun, or other similar implement, or golf or archery equipment in or upon any park; .Provided, that such equipment may be used in areas especially designated or provided for that use, or by specific permit. B. It is unlawful to conduct organized golf, baseball, tennis, soccer, or other games of like character, or to hurl or propel any missile into or over any park, except at places set apart for such purposes. C. It is unlawful to use motorized model aircraft or watercraft in any park, except as specifically permitted. 2.22.190 Fireworks. It is unlawful to carry, shoot, fire, or explode any fireworks or explosives of any kind in any park. 2.22.200 Vehicular stand ards. It is unlawful: A. to enter or leave a park by other than established entrances and exits. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 7 of 10 ORD.A Page 61 of 465 B. to operate a vehicle or a bicycle in any park, except on roads intended for the movement of public vehicular traffic, or on roads and trails specifically designated for special use. C. to park vehicles in any park except in established parking areas. D. to park in any park when the park is closed. Any vehicle that is parked in violation of this subsection may be immediately impounded. E. to service, wash, wax, or change the oil of any vehicle within a park. F. to engage in, conduct, or hold any trials or competitions for 'speed, endurance, or hillclimbing involving any vehicle, boat, or aircraft in any park without specific permit. G. to fail to obey the posted speed limits and all other regulatory signs. 2.22.205 Entrance fees. Where fees are required by the Director for entering any park, it is unlawful to enter without paying the prescribed fee. 2.22.210 Overnight use. It is unlawful to camp or set tents or other shelters overnight in any park, unless authorized by the Director. 2.22.215 Parking fees required. Where parking fees are required by the Director for parking within any park, it is unlawful to park without paying the prescribed parking fee. Any person violating this section shall be deemed to have committed a parking infraction, the penalty for which shall not exceed the sum of $250.00. 2.22.220 Opening and closing hours. A. Unless otherwise posted, park s shall open one -half hour before sunrise and close one -half hour after sunset. Any person entering or remaining in a park when it is closed is :subject to arrest and prosecution for criminal trespass. B. The Director may extend open hours for sanctioned events, but only that portion of a park being used for the event will be open beyond normal hours; other areas of such a park shall remain closed. C. This section shall not apply to: 1. police officers or park employees while on -duty. 2. sidewalks that are within the right -of -way of a public street, when the street is not within the boundaries of a park. 2.22.230 Emergency conditions. A. In case of an emergency, or in case where life and property are endangered, all persons, if requested to do so by the Director or other Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 8 of 10 ORD.A Page 62 of 465 Park employee or a police officer, :shall depart from the portion of the grounds specified by such officer or employee, and shall remain off the same until permission is given to return. B. Any person who remains on park property after being required to leave by a City of Auburn employee or by a police officer, or who returns to the park without permission, is guilty of criminal trespass and may be arrested and prosecuted under the Auburn City Code. Any juvenile violating this section may be arrested and prosecuted under chapter 9.52 RCW, as currently enacted or hereafter amended. 2.22.250 Penalty for violations. Unless specifically designated in the Auburn City Code as a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor, or if specified to be enforced pursuant to other law, including, but not limited to, another section, chapter, or title of the Auburn City Code, any violation of this chapter shall constitute a Class 1 infraction, not to exceed $250, not including statutory assessments. Such penalty is in addition to any other remedies or penalties provided by law. For each act herein prohibited of a continuing nature, each day shall be considered a separate offense 2.22.260 Severability. If any part, provision, or section of this chapter is held to be void or unconstitutional, all other parts not expressly so held shall continue in full force and effect. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 9 of 10 ORD.A Page 63 of 465 Section 4. Effective. date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.. ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk Published:, Ordinance No. 6465 November 13, 2013 Page 10 of 10 ORD.A INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: CITY OF AUBURN PETER. B. LEWIS MAYOR Page 64 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6481 Department: Finance Attachments: Memo Ordinance 6481 Schedule A & B Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $ Background Summary: Ordinance No. 6481 (Budget Amendment #5) amends the 2013 -2014 Revised Budget as presented in the attached transmittal memorandum and supporting attachments. Updated November 12, 2013: The following change has been made to this proposed budget amendment. - Transfer of $2.0M from the General Fund from available ending fund balance to the City's Cumulative Reserve Fund. The Cumulative Reserve Fund accumulates excess reserves for counter - cyclical purposes ( "rainy day ") and capital purposes. - Increase by $700,000 Sewer -Metro waste water revenues and anticipated payments to King County for sewer - wastewater treatment services. Revenues are anticipated to exceed budget; payments are a pass- through to King County. - Increase by $300,000 Solid Waste utility revenues and payments to Waste Management for collection and tipping fee charges. Revenues are anticipated to exceed budget; payments to Waste Management based upon actual amount of refuse collected and disposed. These changes have been incorporated into the attached revised staff transmittal memorandum and supporting attachments to the budget amendment. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Municipal Services, Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember: Partridge ORD.B Staff: Coleman AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 65 of 465 Meeting Date: ORD.B December 2, 2013 Item Number: ORD.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 66 of 465 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director CC: Pete Lewis, Mayor Date: November 6, 2013 Re: Ordinance #6481 — 2013 -2014 Budget Amendment #5 This amendment is the fifth budget amendment for the 2013 -2014 biennium and the final amendment for calendar year 2013. All projects /programs are underway and a budget amendment is requested to ensure sufficient budget authority to meet anticipated expenditures by year end. Proposed amendments to the 2013 budget are as follows: Grant and other revenue funded projects. The following amendments are being requested to formally recognize receipt of grants and other sources of funding: • Grant funded projects Administration o $12,500 from the Washington State Department of Commerce for reimbursement of administrative expenses related to the City's Innovation Partnership Zone (IPZ). Airport o $134,108 from the Federal Aviation Administration and the Washington State Department of Ecology for an Airport Wildlife Hazard Assessment ($28,500) and Airport Master Plan ($105,608). Police o $14,600 from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission for Target Zero, high visibility enforcement and distracted driver patrols. Expenditures for this program are expected to occur in 2013 with particular enforcement emphasis during the holidays. Public Works o $58,413 from the Washington State Military Department for reimbursement of emergency management public education and program administrative expenses. o $50,000 from the Washington State Department of Ecology for stormwater NPDES program implementation expenses. o $48,744 from the King County Flood Control Zone District for reimbursement of Mill Creek project expenses incurred in 2012. o $48,000 from the Washington State Traffic Safety Commission for reimbursement of school zone flashing beacons installation expenses. Equipment is currently being procured and will be installed by the end of the year. ORD.B AUBURN a[ir I IAN You iMAC l age 67 of 465 • Other revenue funded projects Administration o $1,075,000 from the sale of Suite 380 at the Annex Building. Proceeds from the sale will be deposited into the City's Capital Improvements Fund ( #328). Public Works o $91,200 from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe for the undergrounding of overhead utilities on Auburn Way South (CP1118). The MIT will provide a total of $330,000 toward this project; the remaining $238,800 will be budgeted in 2014 (BA #6, Ordinance #6474). o $62,322 from insurance settlement proceeds for traffic signal collision repairs at 29th Street SE and A Street SE (ms1307) and East Main and Auburn Way (ms1308). • Other adjustments Administration o $300,000 for solid waste utility revenues and payments. Anticipated revenues are expected to exceed budget; payments to Waste Management for collection charges and tipping fees. o $151,300 for payment of traffic impact fees related to the downtown property sale for the Trek Apartments. Payment of these fees will be funded from REET2. o $125,000 for property acquisition related to the Promenade project. Public Works o $700,000 for Sewer Metro wastewater revenues and payments. Anticipated revenues are expected to exceed budget; payments are a pass- through to King County Metro. o $300,000 for emergency stormwater drainage pipe repairs for the Hidden Valley Vista neighborhood (em1302). o $300,000 for D Street water utility distribution system improvements (CP1207). o $165,000 for the 2013 roadway pavement patching /chip seal overlay project (CP1302). o $124,080 for the 2013 water, sewer, and stormwater cost of service study. o $63,400 for purchase of a new tractor /mower arm. Purchase of the new arm will extend the tractor /mower's usable life by eight additional years. o $50,000 in budget for the Auburn Way South and 12th Street Improvements is moved from the Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) to the Arterial Street Fund ( #102). This move is being made to consolidate budget authority into a single fund for improved project management (CP1114). o $14,200 is transferred from the Stormwater Utility to the Parks CIP to support the Fenster Levee Project (CP1016). Council approval of proposed Ordinance 6481 would amend the 2013 budget as follows: Table 1: 2013 Budget as Amended 2013 Budget as Amended $ 256,544,721 Budget Amendment #5 (Ord #6481) 4,800,741 Budget as Amended $ 261,345,462 Attachments: • 1. Proposed Ordinance #6481 (budget adjustment #5) • 2. Summary of proposed 2013 budget adjustments by fund and department (Schedule A) • 3. Summary of approved changes to adopted 2013 budget by fund (Schedule B) ORD.B AUBURN i&E. l l IAN YOU iMAC l age 68 of 465 ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 8 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO 6432, THE 2013 -2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6456, ORDINANCE NO 6462, ORDINANCE NO 6472, AND ORDINANCE NO 6473, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF AUBURN 2013 -2014 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE "A" AND SCHEDULE "B" WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 3, 2012, adopted Ordinance No. 6432 which adopted the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of March 4, 2013, adopted Ordinance No 6456 (BA #1) which amended Ordinance No 6432 which adopted the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of May 28, 2013, adopted Ordinance No 6462 (BA #2) which amended Ordinance No. 6456 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of August 5, 2013, adopted Ordinance No. 6472 (BA #3) which amended Ordinance No 6462 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of September 16, 2013, adopted Ordinance No 6473 (BA#4) which amended Ordinance No. 6472 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and Ordinance No. 6481 November 6, 2013 OREg.E1 of 3 Page 69 of 465 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional funds to the various funds of the 2013 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA #5); and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS Section 1. Amendment of the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget. The 2013- 2014 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts shown on said Schedule "A" and Schedule "B ". A copy of said Schedule "A" and Schedule °B" is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection. Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other person or circumstance shall not be affected. Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Ordinance No. 6481 November 6, 2013 Orki9132 of 3 Page 70 of 465 Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law ATTEST. Danielle E. Daskam City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Daniel B Held City Attorney PUBLISHED. INTRODUCED: PASSED. APPROVED: PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR Ordinance No. 6481 November 6, 2013 o . 3 of 3 Page 71 of 465 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 General Fund (#001) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance General Fund 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 12,108,801.00 50,570,748.00 54,368,539.00 8,311,010.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 133,651.00 225,435.00 750,101.54 (391,015.54) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 4,142,108.93 830,900.00 1,019,373.93 3,953,635.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Police Grant funding from Washington State Traffic Commission. 0.00 14,600.00 14,600.00 0.00 Planning Grant funding from Washington State Department 0.00 12,500.00 12,500.00 0.00 of Commerce for Innovative Partnership Zone (IPZ). Public Works Traffic Signal collision repairs; insurance reimbursed 29th St SE & A St SE (MS1307) 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 East Main & Auburn Way (MS1308) 0.00 12,322.00 12,322.00 0.00 Public Works - Emergency Management WA State 2013 Performance Grant (RES 4980; 8.19.2013). 0.00 58,413.00 58,413.00 0.00 Other King County Flood Control District grant for reimbursement 0.00 48,744.00 0.00 48,744.00 of 2012 Mill Creek Project expenses. Transfer available fund resources to Cumulative Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 (2,000,000.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 196,579.00 2,147,835.00 (1,951,256.00) 2013 Revised Budget 16,384,560.93 51,823,662.00 58,285,849.47 9,922,373.46 Memo: Unrestricted GF Ending fund balance Memo: Restricted GF Ending fund balance for salaries /benefits Total Resources / Expenditures 8.0% General Fund Reserve Requirement 68,208,222.93 8,040,289.46 1,882,084.00 68,208,222.93 4,662,867.96 ORD.B Page 72 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 1 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Arterial Street Fund ( #102) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 1,300,518.00 13,120,070.00 13,564,224.00 856,364.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 767,234.00 703,470.87 1,467,966.87 2,738.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 75,961.00 115,000.00 115,000.00 75,961.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Auburn Way South Pedestrian Improvements (CP1118) 0.00 91,200.00 91,200.00 0.00 Funded by Muckleshoot Indian Tribe contribution. City School Zone Flashing Beacons (GR1302) - 0.00 48,000.00 60,000.00 (12,000.00) 80% funded by WA Traffic Safety Commission grant (per RES 4966; 7.01.2013). REET2 Transfer In from Fund 328 for Auburn Way South 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 and 12th Street Improvements (CP1114). BA #5 Total 0.00 189,200.00 201,200.00 (12,000.00) 2013 Revised Budget 2,143,713.00 14,127,740.87 15,348,390.87 923,063.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 16,271,453.87 16,271,453.87 Arterial Street Preservation Fund ( #105) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 1,654,369.00 2,561,488.00 2,630,920.00 1,584,937.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 60,000.00 0.00 60,000.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) (34,068.00) 0.00 0.00 (34,068.00) BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) 2013 Pavement Patching /Chip Seal /Overlay (CP1302) 0.00 0.00 165,000.00 (165,000.00) increased funding to complete improvements. BA #5 Total 0.00 0.00 165,000.00 (165,000.00) 2013 Revised Budget 1,680,301.00 2,561,488.00 2,855,920.00 1,385,869.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,241,789.00 4,241,789.00 ORD.B Page 73 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 2 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Cumulative Reserve Fund ( #122) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 7,313,905.00 3,000.00 1,616,109.00 5,700,796.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 39,053.00 0.00 0.00 39,053.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Golf Course debt service administrative fees 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 (1,000.00) Transfer to Golf Course debt service fund 417. Transfer In from General Fund 0.00 2,000,000.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 BA #5 Total 0.00 2,000,000.00 1,000.00 1,999,000.00 2013 Revised Budget 7,352,958.00 2,003,000.00 1,617,109.00 7,738,849.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 9,355,958.00 9,355,958.00 Mitigation Fees Fund ( #124) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 2,368,612.00 880,000.00 717,210.00 2,531,402.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 692,567.00 0.00 151,959.87 540,607.13 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Traffic Impact Fee revenues from Fund 328 for Trek 0.00 151,300.00 0.00 151,300.00 development. Transfer Out to Fund 328 for CP1315 - City Wetland Mitigation 0.00 0.00 3,554.00 (3,554.00) Projects. BA #5 Total 0.00 151,300.00 3,554.00 147,746.00 2013 Revised Budget 3,061,179.00 1,031,300.00 872,723.87 3,219,755.13 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,092,479.00 4,092,479.00 ORD.B Page 74 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 3 ORD Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Municipal Park Construction Fund ( #321) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 613,497.00 1,216,770.00 1,505,000.00 325,267.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 626,025.00 477,296.50 1,103,321.50 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) (809,407.00) 626,025.00 0.00 (183,382.00) BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 270,240.00 270,240.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Transfer In from Fund 432 for Fenster Levee Project, CP1016. Reduce 0.00 14,200.00 0.00 14,200.00 State grant revenues to meet grant matching requirements. 0.00 (14,200.00) 0.00 (14,200.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 430,115.00 2,590,331.50 2,878,561.50 141,885.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 3,020,446.50 3,020,446.50 Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 5,268,537.00 1,551,487.00 2,053,720.00 4,766,304.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 675,543.50 109,734.00 854,277.50 (69,000.00) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 468,394.50 0.00 11,408.00 456,986.50 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 270,240.00 (270,240.00) BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Proceeds from sale of Suite 380 at the Annex Building. 0.00 1,075,000.00 0.00 1,075,000.00 Payment of Traffic Impact Fees for Trek development to Fund 124; 0.00 0.00 151,300.00 (151,300.00) source REET 2. Stratford property acquisition (per RES 4935 04.15.2013) related to 0.00 0.00 125,000.00 (125,000.00) Promenade Project. REET 2 Transfer Out to Fund 102 Auburn Way South and 12th Street 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00) Improvements (CP1114). Reduce Capital Improvement Project budget for traffic 0.00 0.00 (50,000.00) 50,000.00 signal improvements to offset CP1114 (above). Transfer In from Fund 124 for City Wetland Mitigation Project (CP1315). 0.00 3,554.00 3,554.00 0.00 BA #5 Total 0.00 1,078,554.00 279,854.00 798,700.00 2013 Revised Budget 6,412,475.00 2,739,775.00 3,469,499.50 5,682,750.50 Total Resources / Expenditures fl 9,152,250.00 rt ........ _ 7r _r Anr 9,152,250.00 rdyC /J VI'-10U F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 4 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Golf Course Debt Service Fund (#417) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending i-una Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 0.00 390,429.00 390,429.00 0.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Golf Debt Service Admin Fees (Bank of New York), 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 funded by Transfer In from Cumulative Reserve. BA #5 Total 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 0.00 391,429.00 391,429.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 391,429.00 391,429.00 Water Fund (#430) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 2,983,426.00 23,051,704.00 19,416,148.00 6,618,982.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 6,672,167.40 0.00 6,755,594.47 (83,427.07) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 540,687.70 (14,705.00) 794,319.00 (268,336.30) BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) D Street Utilities Improvement Project (CP1207) - increase 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 (300,000.00) funding to complete needed water system improvements. Cost of Service Study - 50% water funded. 0.00 0.00 62,040.00 (62,040.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 0.00 362,040.00 (362,040.00) 2013 Revised Budget 10,196,281.10 23,036,999.00 27,328,101.47 5,905,178.63 Total Resources / Expenditures 33,233,280.10 33,233,280.10 ORD.B Page 76 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 5 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Sewer Fund (#431) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 8,899,265.00 20,903,571.00 22,226,119.00 7,576,717.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 1,379,247.00 (14,000,000.00) (12,565,169.65) (55,583.35) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 1,794,067.09 (6,575.00) 14,319.00 1,773,173.09 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Cost of Service Study - 25% sewer funded. 0.00 0.00 31,020.00 (31,020.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 0.00 31,020.00 (31,020.00) 2013 Revised Budget 12,072,579.09 6,896,996.00 9,706,288.35 9,263,286.74 Total Resources / Expenditures 18,969,575.09 18,969,575.09 Storm Drainage Fund (#432) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 6,057,392.00 13,564,424.00 13,322,702.00 6,299,114.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 3,893,475.00 0.00 3,960,149.94 (66,674.94) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 267,981.21 64,269.00 1,243,089.00 (910,838.79) BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Hidden Valley Vista Emergency Outfall Repair 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 (300,000.00) project (EM1302; per RES 4969, 07.01.2013). Grant funding from Washington State Department of 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 Ecology for stormwater NPDES program expenses. Cost of Service Study - 25% storm funded. 0.00 0.00 31,020.00 (31,020.00) Transfer Out to Fund 321 for Fenster Levee Project, CP1016. 0.00 0.00 14,200.00 (14,200.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 50,000.00 395,220.00 (345,220.00) 2013 Revised Budget 10,218,848.21 13,678,693.00 18,921,160.94 4,976,380.27 Total Resources / Expenditures 23,897,541.21 23,897,541.21 ORD.B Page 77 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 6 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Sewer Metro Fund (#433) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Adjust Metro Wastewater revenues and pass -thru expenditures 0.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 BA #5 Total 0.00 700,000.00 700,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 0.00 14,700,000.00 14,700,000.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 14,700,000.00 14,700,000.00 Solid Waste Fund (#434) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 725,294.00 11,954,270.00 12,083,202.00 596,362.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 825,000.00 248,901.54 576,098.46 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 293,193.34 0.00 0.00 293,193.34 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Adjust solid waste revenues and waste - management expenditures 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 BA #5 Total 0.00 300,000.00 300,000.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 1,018,487.34 13,079,270.00 12,632,103.54 1,465,653.80 Total Resources / Expenditures 14,097,757.34 14,097,757.34 ORD.B Page 78 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 7 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Airport Fund (#435) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 727,073.00 724,880.00 907,801.00 544,152.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 145,846.00 0.00 145,846.00 0.00 BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) (54,007.00) 86,346.00 0.00 32,339.00 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 105,000.00 110,000.00 (5,000.00) BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) Increase project budget for Airport Master Plan (CP1221) - funded by 0.00 105,608.00 111,500.00 (5,892.00) FAA grant ($100,000); State DOT grant ($5,608); and City ($5,892). Increase project budget for Airport Wildlife Hazardous 0.00 28,500.00 30,000.00 (1,500.00) Assessment - funded by FAA grant ($27,000), State DOT grant ($1,500); and City ($1,500). BA #5 Total 0.00 134,108.00 141,500.00 (7,392.00) 2013 Revised Budget 818,912.00 1,050,334.00 1,305,147.00 564,099.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,869,246.00 1,869,246.00 Equipment Rental Fund ( #550) Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 4,511,304.00 3,113,450.00 4,389,664.00 3,235,090.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 0.00 0.00 9,375.66 (9,375.66) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 1,048,260.94 0.00 45,693.00 1,002,567.94 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #5 (Proposed ORD 6481) New Arm For Tractor /Mower. Replacement will extend equipment 0.00 0.00 63,400.00 (63,400.00) life by estimated 8 additional years. BA #5 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2013 Revised Budget 5,559,564.94 3,113,450.00 4,444,732.66 4,228,282.28 Total Resources / Expenditures 8,673,014.94 8,673,014.94 ORD.B Page 79 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 8 Schedule A Summary of 2013 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 Ordinance 6481 Grand Total - All Funds Beg. Fund Balance 2013 Revenues 2013 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2013 Adopted Budget (ORD 6432; 12.3.2012) 66,056,411.00 160,298,583.00 168,557,536.00 57,797,458.00 BA #1 (ORD 6456; 3.4.2013) 16,059,938.79 2,415,936.37 18,667,324.75 (191,449.59) BA #2 (ORD 6462; 6.17.2013) 9,441,816.90 1,896,795.00 3,541,326.80 7,797,285.10 BA #3 (ORD 6472; 8.15.2013) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #4 (ORD 6473; 9.16.2013) 0.00 375,240.00 650,480.00 (275,240.00) BA #5 Total 0.00 4,800,741.00 4,729,223.00 71,518.00 2013 Revised Budget 91,558,166.69 169,787,295.37 196,145,890.55 65,199,571.51 Total Resources / Expenditures Prepared by City of Auburn Finance Department 261,345,462.06 261,345,462.06 ORD.B Page 80 of 465 F: \Budget Directory \2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx 9 Schedule B 2013 Appropriations by Fund 2013 Appropriation Authority by Fund Fund 2013 kdc pt B t t d g t B # O r d 6 + 4 Bj O r d 6 + 4 6 2 B , , O r d 6 4 7 2 iiiiiiiiii, ! Ord, 6 + 4 7 Bk# Ord 6 4 ©xa1 rd 13 ReVtse4 Budg t General Fund ( #001) 62,679,549.00 359,086.00 4,973,008.93 - - 196,579.00 5,528,673.93 68,208,222.93 Arterial Street Fund ( #102) 14,420,588.00 1,470,704.87 190,961.00 - - 189,200.00 1,850,865.87 16,271,453.87 Local Street Fund ( #103) 2,744,920.00 390,000.00 228,163.00 - - - 618,163.00 3,363,083.00 Hotel Motel Fund ( #104) 171,181.00 - 17,982.00 - - - 17,982.00 189,163.00 Arterial Street Preservation Fund ( #105) 4,215,857.00 60,000.00 (34,068.00) - - - 25,932.00 4,241,789.00 Drug Forfeiture Fund ( #117) 1,200,390.00 - (61,016.00) - - - (61,016.00) 1,139,374.00 Housing and Community Development Grant Fund ( #119) 505,647.00 - 129,765.00 - - - 129,765.00 635,412.00 Recreation Trails Fund ( #120) 29,571.00 - - - - - - 29,571.00 Business Improvement Area Fund ( #121) 76,680.00 - 2,816.00 - - - 2,816.00 79,496.00 Cumulative Reserve Fund ( #122) 7,316,905.00 - 39,053.00 - - 2,000,000.00 2,039,053.00 9,355,958.00 Mitigation Fees Fund ( #124) 3,248,612.00 - 692,567.00 - - 151,300.00 843,867.00 4,092,479.00 1998 Library Fund ( #229) 326,654.00 - - - - - - 326,654.00 2010 Annex A &B Bond Debt Fund ( #230) 1,696,678.00 - - - - - - 1,696,678.00 2010 C &D Local Revitalization Debt Fund ( #231) 594,570.00 - - - - - - 594,570.00 LID Guarantee Fund ( #249) 44,588.00 - - - - - - 44,588.00 LID #250 ( #250) 56,741.00 - - - - - - 56,741.00 LID #350 ( #275) 7,245.00 - 5,631.00 - - - 5,631.00 12,876.00 Municipal Park Construction Fund ( #321) 1,830,267.00 1,103,321.50 (183,382.00) - 270,240.00 - 1,190,179.50 3,020,446.50 Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) 6,820,024.00 785,277.50 468,394.50 - - 1,078,554.00 2,332,226.00 9,152,250.00 Local Revitalization Fund ( #330) - 667,975.89 - - - - 667,975.89 667,975.89 Golf Course Debt Service Fund ( #417) 390,429.00 - - - - 1,000.00 1,000.00 391,429.00 Water Fund ( #430) 26,035,130.00 6,672,167.40 525,982.70 - - - 7,198,150.10 33,233,280.10 Sewer Fund (#431) 29,802,836.00 (12,620,753.00) 1,787,492.09 - - - (10,833,260.91) 18,969,575.09 Storm Drainage Fund ( #432) 19,621,816.00 3,893,475.00 332,250.21 - - 50,000.00 4,275,725.21 23,897,541.21 Sewer Metro Fund ( #433) - 14,000,000.00 - - - 700,000.00 14,700,000.00 14,700,000.00 Solid Waste Fund ( #434) 12,679,564.00 825,000.00 293,193.34 - - 300,000.00 1,418,193.34 14,097,757.34 Airport Fund ( #435) 1,451,953.00 145,846.00 32,339.00 - 105,000.00 134,108.00 417,293.00 1,869,246.00 Cemetery Fund ( #436) 1,062,416.00 30,000.00 168,692.05 - - - 198,692.05 1,261,108.05 Golf Course Fund ( #437) 1,611,664.00 - (15,292.38) - - - (15,292.38) 1,596,371.62 Insurance Fund ( #501) 1,986,779.00 - 43,902.08 - - - 43,902.08 2,030,681.08 Facilities Fund ( #505) 4,563,249.00 120,674.00 432,752.96 - - - 553,426.96 5,116,675.96 Innovation and Technology Fund ( #518) 7,237,981.00 589,100.00 258,060.19 - - - 847,160.19 8,085,141.19 Equipment Rental Fund ( #550) 7,624,754.00 - 1,048,260.94 - - - 1,048,260.94 8,673,014.94 Fire Pension Fund ( #611) 2,663,285.00 - (38,441.71) - - - (38,441.71) 2,624,843.29 Cemetery Endowment Fund ( #701) 1,636,471.00 (16,000.00) (455.00) - - - (16,455.00) 1,620,016.00 otai 226 41394 OO 1 d75 $7516 11 3 & 611 96 375 246 OO 4 IIO6 4 1 00 34 990 61 O6 261 34 62 08 Note: BA #3 resulted in no net change to budgeted appropriations. Updated Nov 08, 2013 Prepared by City of Auburn Finance Department F: \Budget Directory\2013 Budget \Amendments \BA #5 - eoy2013 adjustments \BA #5 Schedule A and B \BA #5 - Sched A and B.xlsx ORD.B Page 81 of 465 10 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6474 Department: Finance Attachments: Memo Ordinance No. 6474 Schedule A & B Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $22,980,019 City Council to adopt Ordinance No. 6474, amending the 2014 budget. Background Summary: Ordinance No. 6474 (Budget Amendment #6) represents the sixth budget amendment for the 2013 -2014 biennium and the first budget amendment for 2014. For details, see the attached transmittal memorandum and supporting attachments. Updated November 26, 2013: This amendment was updated for the following changes, all of which are expected to occur in 2014 and will therefore require appropriation authority from Council: - $4,275,760 for beginning 2014 General Fund fund balance. This change reflect Council approved adjustments to the beginning balance in budget adjustments #1 and #2 - $1,000,000 for Sewer -Metro wastewater revenues and payments to King County (parallel to 2013 budget adjustment of $700,000, plus estimated growth). - $195,195 for purchase of project management software. The Public Works Department presented /reviewed with Council the proposed software and its anticipated benefits to the City. Council feedback from these presentations were positive with direction to include in BA #6. - $186,000 in grant funding was received from the Washington State Department of Ecology to evaluate the environmental, public health and economic impacts of issues related to contaminated groundwater associated with the Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility. While the grant was awarded in November 2013, substantive expenses that will accrue against this grant is not expected until 2014. - $52,500 (net cost) to support park property purchases (Perry property to support the expansion of Isaac Evans Park as well as connection to the Green River Trail system and Rice property to support the Fenster Levee Setback project. While negotiations are ORD.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 82 of 465 underway, the actual purchase is not expected until 2014. The total cost of these purchases is $105,000 (budgeted in the Parks Capital fund) is partially offset by $30,000 in revenue from a King Conservation Futures grant and a $22,500 transfer from the General Fund. - $62,600 for purchase of police vehicle as authorized by BA #3 (Ord 6472). This purchase is anticipated to occur in 2014. - Golf Course operations and debt service moved from enterprise to general governmental operations. - New Worker's Compensation Self Insurance Fund is created /budgeted. - $6.0M in city funding for the construction of the Auburn Community Center is budgeted; augmented by $3.0M in State funding. These updates have been incorporated into the attached staff memorandum and proposed budget amendment. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Municipal Services, Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember: Partridge Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 ORD.0 Staff: Coleman Item Number: ORD.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 83 of 465 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director CC: Pete Lewis, Mayor Date: October 11, 2013 Re: Ordinance #6474 — 2013 -2014 Budget Amendment #6 The City's biennial 2013 -2014 budget is approved by Council as two one -year appropriations. Budget Amendments #1 through #5 amended the budget for calendar year 2013. This amendment is the 6th budget amendment for the biennium and the 1st budget amendment for calendar year 2014. The purpose of this amendment is to 1) amend the 2014 budget for changes that occurred in 2013 for which there is an on -going fiscal impact; 2) to carryforward capital project budgets that are not anticipated to be completed in 2013; and 3) to establish budget spending authority for new programs and other changes in 2014. Proposed amendments to the 2014 budget are as follows: Continuation of previously approved requests by Council. The following items (grouped in chronologic order by budget amendment) were previously approved by Council in 2013 and will continue as an ongoing cost in 2014. These include: Budget Amendment #1, Ordinance #6456 (approved March 4, 2013) • Move King County Metro expenses from Sewer Utility to newly created Sewer Metro Fund ($14.0 million; an additional $1,000,000 is budgeted to reflect $700,000 budget amendment included for 2013, plus estimated growth) • Economic Development Planner (1.0FTE; $118,550) • Emergency Management Office Assistant (.4FTE; $22,373) • Stratford parking lot maintenance and Sound Transit garage security ($22,000) • Labor agreements (funded by remaining labor contingency established by Council) Budget Amendment #2, Ordinance #6462 (approved June 17, 2013) • Eliminate Cemetery Office Assistant (- 1.0FTE; - $78,004) • Equipment Rental Office Assistant (1.0FTE; $77,545) • Centralizing cost of Median Maintenance in General Fund from Stormwater Fund ($74,000) • Museum Contracted Curator and Asst. Curator ($67,700) • Community Diversity Assistant (.25FTE; $16,724) • Parks Senior Center Assistant (.5FTE; $13,390. Cost partially offset by savings in temporary help) ORD.0 AUBURN I&E, l l IAN YOU iMAC l age 84 of 465 Budget Amendment #3, Ordinance #6472 (approved August 15, 2013) • Five Police Officers in BA #3 (5.0FTEs; $589,830) • Police vehicle to support additional officers ($62,600; carried forward as actual purchase will be made in 2014) • Federal COPS grant funded Police Officers (5.0FTEs; $313,850. Cost partially offset by federal Community Oriented Policing grant) Solid Waste rate adjustment, Ordinance #6438 (approved November 7, 2012) • The City Council approved Ordinance #6438 which established revised solid waste rates effective January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014. This amendment revises the 2014 budget for the Solid Waste Fund ( #434) consistent with this ordinance. Project Adjustments. This item includes 1) requested project expenses that were previously approved in 2013 but will require carryforward to 2014 to enable project completion and 2) requested transportation project expenses as approved by Council per Resolution #4937 (adopted June 17, 2013), which approved the 2014 -2019 Transportation Improvement Plan. Project budget changes are included in the Arterial Street Fund ( #102), Local Street Fund ( #103), Arterial Street Preservation Fund ( #105), Water Utility Fund ( #430), Stormwater Utility Fund ( #432) and Airport Fund ( #435). Other Requests. Other items requested for funding in this budget amendment include: Revenue Adjustments: Several revenue adjustments amending the 2014 budget are proposed as part of this budget adjustment. These adjustments include: • Recognizing $3.0 million in funding from the State of Washington towards construction of the Auburn Community Center. • Adjusting beginning General Fund fund balance to reflect Council approved changes to the beginning fund balance in budget adjustments #1 and #2. • Adjusting property taxes upward ( +$1.4 million to $15.7 million), reflecting a revision to the City's levy cap by King County as well as estimated new construction and a 1.0% property tax increase; • Adjusting sales taxes upward ( +$1.5 million to $13.0 million) and adjusting sales taxes on construction transferred to the Local Street Construction fund #103 ( +$266,000 to $1.6 million), reflecting improvement in general economic conditions and retail sales activity; and • Adjusting building permit fees ( +$345,000 to $1.2 million) and plan check fees ( +$121,000 to $585,000), reflecting the continued strengthening of the local and regional economy. New staffing: The following new positions are being requested: • Records Clerk, Legal Department (1.0FTE; $86,800): Funding is requested to hire a second legal clerk to support public records requests. The additional position will enable the City to keep up with workload and state law requirements regarding the proper disclosure of information. • Administrative Assistant, Innovation and Technology Department (1.0FTE; $79,600): Funding is requested to hire an Administrative Assistant to support the IT Department Director and staff with daily administrative functions. Current administrative duties are handled by the Director and staff; approval of this position will enable the Department to utilize its technology staff more efficiently. • Mechanic, Public Works M &O (1.0FTE; $0 net cost): Funding is requested to hire an additional Mechanic to support the Public Works Maintenance and Operations Center. The additional position will enable the M &O Center to keep pace with workload and to utilize less overtime and extra help. It is expected that the cost of this function will be fully offset by savings in overtime and extra help. Downtown property sales ($1,045,300): Payment of traffic impact fees related to the sale of the Teutsch property in downtown is recognized. Payment of these fees will occur in the City's Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) and will be payable to the City's Mitigation Fees Fund ( #124). ORD.0 AUBURN i&E. I IAN YOU iMAC l age 85 of 465 Protect management software ($195,195): Funding for the purchase of proprietary software to enable comprehensive city -wide project management. This software will standardize workflows, standardize project documentation /planning, financial /project management reports, and eliminate the need for maintaining separate worksheets /documents for project management. Expected benefits will include more efficient utilization of limited staff and project management resources and improved project budget management. Environmental /Property evaluation ($186,000): Grant funding from the Washington State Department of Ecology for evaluating environmental, public health, and economic development issues related to contaminated groundwater associated with the Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility and identifying strategies for the redevelopment of affected properties (gr1304). Fully fund fire pension liabilities ($231,000): Funding to transfer $231,000 from the General Fund to the Fire Pension Fund ( #611) is requested, enabling the City to fully fund its pension liability for eligible retired firefighters. Park property purchases ($105,000): Funding to purchase two park properties is requested as follows. $60,000 for the purchase of 1.15 acre parcel (aka Perry property) to support the expansion of Isaac Evans Park as well as connection to the Green River Trail system; and $45,000 for the acquisition of vacant land (aka Rice property) adjacent to the portion of the City owned Fenster Nature Park where the Fenster Levee Setback project (CP1015) will be constructed. KidStock community festival ($30,500) & Arts /Events six year action plan ($15,000): Funding is requested by the Parks Department to establish a kids oriented community festival. The cost of this request will be partially offset by $10,000 in anticipated revenue from sale of merchandise at the festival. Funding is also requested to evaluate the needs and strategies for continuing to provide cultural and community arts /events in the City. Innovation and Technology Stand -by pay ($15,990): Funding is requested by the Innovation and Technology Department for standby pay paid to technology staff required to be on stand -by on evenings and weekends ($2.50 /hour). Golf Course operations: Budget authority for the Golf Course is moved from enterprise operations to general government operations. Worker's Compensation Self Insurance Fund ($840,000): Fund and budget authority for the new Worker's Compensation Self Insurance fund is established. Cumulative Reserve Fund beginning balance ($2,000,000): Beginning fund balance is adjusted to reflect a transfer -in from the General Fund in 2013 as authorized in BA #5 (ORD6481). Auburn Community Center ($9,000,000): Funding for the construction of the proposed Auburn Community Center is established. Resources include $6.0M in available city funds which will be transferred into and budgeted in the Parks Capital Construction Fund ( #321). These resources will be augmented by a $3.0 million contribution from the State of Washington for construction of the Community Center. ORD.0 AUBURN atio t l IAN YOU IPvtAC It age 86 of 465 Council approval of proposed Ordinance 6474 would amend the 2014 budget as follows: Table 2: 2014 Budget as Amended 2014 Budget as Adopted $ 212,945,255 Budget Amendment #6 (Ord #6474) 22,980,019 Budget as Amended $235,925,274 Attachments: • 1. Proposed Ordinance #6474 (budget adjustment #6) • 2. Summary of proposed 2014 budget adjustments by fund and department (Schedule A) • 3. Summary of approved changes to adopted 2014 budget by fund (Schedule B) ORD.0 AUBURN i&E. l l IAN YOU IPvtAC l age 87 of 465 ORDINANCE NO. 6474 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6432, THE 2013 -2014 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6456, ORDINANCE NO. 6462, ORDINANCE NO. 6472, ORDINANCE NO. 6473, ORDINANCE 6481, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF AUBURN 2013 -2014 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE "A" AND SCHEDULE "B" WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 3, 2012, adopted Ordinance No. 6432 which adopted the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of March 4, 2013, adopted Ordinance No. 6456 (BA #1) which amended Ordinance No. 6432 which adopted the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of May 28, 2013, adopted Ordinance No. 6462 (BA #2) which amended Ordinance No. 6456 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of August 5, 2013, adopted Ordinance No. 6472 (BA #3) which amended Ordinance No. 6462 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of September 16, 2013, adopted Ordinance No. 6473 (BA #4) which amended Ordinance No. 6472 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and Ordinance No. 6474 October 11, 2013 ORp.tle 1 of 4 Page 88 of 465 WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council is scheduled to review Ordinance No. 6481 (BA #5) in late 2013, which will amend Ordinance No. 6473 which amended the City of Auburn 2013 -2014 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional funds to the various funds of the 2014 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA #6); and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment of the 2013 -2014 Biennial Budget. The 2013- 2014 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts shown on said Schedule "A" and Schedule "B ". A copy of said Schedule "A" and Schedule "B" is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection. Section 2. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the remainder of such code, ordinance or regulation or the application thereof to other person or circumstance shall not be affected. Ordinance No. 6474 October 11, 2013 ORp.�e2of4 Page 89 of 465 Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five (5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: PASSED: APPROVED: PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam City Clerk Ordinance No. 6474 October 11, 2013 ORp.�e3of4 Page 90 of 465 APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel B. Heid City Attorney PUBLISHED: Ordinance No. 6474 October 11, 2013 ORI�pp.tle 4 of 4 Page 91 of 465 ORD.0 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 General Fund ( #001) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance General Fund 2014 Adopted Budget 8,311,010.00 50,553,102.00 54,498,330.00 4,365,782.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Revenues Beginning Fund Balance Adjust beginning 2014 fund balance for BFB adjustments in BA #1, #2 4,275,760.00 0.00 0.00 4,275,760.00 Economic Recovery Continuation of previously approved requests. Sales Tax revenue adjustment 0.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 Budget amended from $11.5 million to $13.0 million. Property Tax King County adjustment to assessed valuation. Budget amended 0.00 1,400,000.00 0.00 1,400,000.00 from $14.3 million to $15.7 million. King County District Court Transition Court Interpreter Revenue decrease due to KCDC transition. 0.00 (14,000.00) 0.00 (14,000.00) Court Interest Revenue decrease due to KCDC transition. 0.00 (22,500.00) 0.00 (22,500.00) Trial Court Improvement revenue decrease due to KCDC transition. 0.00 (24,869.00) 0.00 (24,869.00) Adult Probation Revenue decrease due to KCDC transition. 0.00 (203,015.00) 0.00 (203,015.00) Labor Agreements Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013) funded from non - departmental contingency. Police 0.00 0.00 681,295.31 (681,295.31) Planning 0.00 0.00 44,848.40 (44,848.40) Public Works 0.00 0.00 41,113.29 (41,113.29) Parks 0.00 0.00 41,103.16 (41,103.16) Legal 0.00 0.00 21,924.68 (21,924.68) Human Resources 0.00 0.00 16,454.08 (16,454.08) Finance 0.00 0.00 14,741.45 (14,741.45) Mayor 0.00 0.00 10,073.80 (10,073.80) Streets 0.00 0.00 3,080.26 (3,080.26) Carryforward unspent labor contingency from 2013 871,796.00 0.00 0.00 871,796.00 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget Police 0.00 0.00 37,259.00 (37,259.00) Planning 0.00 0.00 3,458.00 (3,458.00) Public Works 0.00 0.00 4,875.00 (4,875.00) Parks 0.00 0.00 10,441.00 (10,441.00) Legal 0.00 0.00 669.00 (669.00) Human Resources 0.00 0.00 982.00 (982.00) Finance 0.00 0.00 508.00 (508.00) Mayor 0.00 0.00 267.00 (267.00) Streets 0.00 0.00 5,010.00 (5,010.00) Allocated overhead to Worker's Compensation Fund (HR /Finance) (114,776.00) 114,776.00 Legal Department New FTE - 1.0 Records Clerk (93.5% GF Funded). 0.00 0.00 81,323.17 (81,323.17) Police Department Restoration of 5 existing Police Officers. 0.00 0.00 589,830.00 (589,830.00) Continuation of previously approved requests 5 new Police Officers (BA #3; 8.15.2013) partially funded by Federal 0.00 205,780.00 519,630.00 (313,850.00) COPS grant. New Police Vehicle for new Police Officers approved in BA #3. 0.00 0.00 62,600.00 (62,600.00) Parks Department New Kid Stock community festival; partially funded by festival revenues. 0.00 10,000.00 30,500.00 (20,500.00) Arts & Events Six -year Action Plan. 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 (15,000.00) Continuation of previously approved requests Median Maintenance Centralized in the GF from SWM (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 74,000.00 74,000.00 0.00 Museum Contract Labor: Curator of Collections (BA #1; 3.4.2013). 0.00 0.00 35,617.39 (35,617.39) F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 1 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Museum Contract Labor: Asst. Curator of Education (BA #1; 3.4.2013). 0.00 0.00 32,080.83 (32,080.83) Senior Center Assistant (0.5 FTE to 1.0 FTE). 0.00 0.00 24,390.00 (24,390.00) partially offset by reducing temporary help (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 (11,000.00) 11,000.00 Move Appropriation authority from Golf Course Fund (adjusted for admissions tax payments) 91,134.00 1,469,430.00 1,485,577.00 74,987.00 Move Golf Debt Service Admin Fees, funded by Transfer in from Cumulative Reserve 0.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 Public Works Project Management E- Builder Software (14% GF Funded); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. Continuation of previously approved requests Emerg Mgmt Office Asst (0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE; 30% GF; BA #1; 3.04.2013). 0.00 0.00 6,711.90 (6,711.90) Planning Department Building Permit revenue increase due to local development activity. 0.00 345,000.00 0.00 345,000.00 Plan Check revenue increase due to local development activity. 0.00 121,000.00 0.00 121,000.00 Washington State Department of Ecology grant reimbursement 0.00 186,000.00 186,000.00 0.00 to evaluate health /economic /land -use effects of groundwater contamination. Transfer Out to Fund 321 for 1/2 purchase price of Rice Property - 0.00 0.00 22,500.00 (22,500.00) offset by reduction in planning department. (22,500.00) 22,500.00 Continuation of previously approved requests Economic Development Planner (1.0 FTE; BA #1; 3.04.2013). 0.00 0.00 118,550.00 (118,550.00) Merchant transaction fees associated with increased 0.00 0.00 35,000.00 (35,000.00) building permit activity. Community Diversity Asst (0.75 FTE to 1.0 FTE; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 16,724.00 (16,724.00) Street Department Continuation of previously approved requests ER &R Office Assistant (10% GF; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 7,754.00 (7,754.00) Non - Departmental Fully fund fire pension liability (transfer to F611). 0.00 0.00 231,000.00 (231,000.00) BA #6 Total 5,238,690.00 5,047,826.00 4,393,500.72 5,893,015.28 2014 Revised Budget 13,549,700.00 55,600,928.00 58,891,830.72 10,258,797.28 Memo: Unrestricted GF Ending fund balance Memo: Restricted GF Ending fund balance for salaries /benefits Total Resources / Expenditures 8.0% General Fund Reserve Requirement 69,150,628.00 9,248,509.28 1,010,288.00 69,150,628.00 4,711,346.46 ORD.0 Page 93 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 2 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Arterial Street Fund ( #102) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 856,364.00 3,849,658.00 3,892,270.00 813,752.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Adjust beginning fund balance 92,300.00 0.00 0.00 92,300.00 Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Funded by F102); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 1,075.00 (1,075.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments C222A0 - S. 277th (AWN to Green River Br); (funding: Federal grant). 2,700.00 700,260.00 702,960.00 0.00 CP1119 - AWS Corridor (funding: MIT contribution $230K and traffic 0.00 230,000.00 430,000.00 (200,000.00) impact fees $200K). 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 TIP #21 - Main St. Signal Upgrades. 0.00 0.00 265,000.00 (265,000.00) CP1218 - AWS Corridor Safety (funding: traffic impact fees). 0.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 CP1114 - AWS & 12th St. SE (funding: traffic impact fees). 0.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 0.00 CP1118 - AWS Pedestrian Dogwood to Fir; (funding: MIT contribution). 0.00 238,800.00 238,800.00 0.00 TIP #68 - 37th St. SE & A St. SE Traffic Signal (funding: State Grant). 0.00 121,400.00 176,400.00 (55,000.00) TIP #30 - Citywide Pedestrian Crossing Program. 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 (150,000.00) TIP #23 - A St. SE Non - Motorized Access (funding: Federal grant). 0.00 89,029.00 89,029.00 0.00 TIP #27 - A St. SE Safety Improvement Study. 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00) TIP #54 - Kersey Way SE Corridor Study (funding: traffic mitigation fees). 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 CP0911 - F St. SE (4th St. SE to AWS); (funding: Traffic impact fees). 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 TIP #40 - 124th Ave. SE Corridor Ph. 1 (funding: Traffic impact fees $175,000; 0.00 175,000.00 50,000.00 125,000.00 federal grant reduced $125,000). 0.00 (125,000.00) 0.00 (125,000.00) TIP #38 - 37th & B St. NW Railroad Crossing Safety Improv. 0.00 0.00 26,900.00 (26,900.00) TIP #33 - BNSF 3rd Rail Expansion Roadway Improv. 0.00 0.00 25,000.00 (25,000.00) TIP #47 - Environmental Park Roadway Improv. Study. 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 TIP #48 - Downtown to Les Gove Non - Motorized Imp. Study. 10,000.00 0.00 10,000.00 0.00 TIP #49 - S. 316th St. Bicycle & Pedestrian Improv. Study. 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 (5,000.00) TIP #56 - Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improv. (CP1120). 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 (5,000.00) TIP #67 - Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improv. (CP1222). 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 (5,000.00) CP0912 - Citywide Guardrail Improv. 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CP1021 - 104th Ave. SE & Green River Road Study. 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CP1104 - 8th Street NE /104th Ave. SE Intersection Improv. 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 TIP #41 - 124th Ave. SE Corridor Ph.2 (deleted; combine with TIP #40). 0.00 (50,000.00) (50,000.00) 0.00 CP1024 - AWN & M St. SE Intersection (funding: Federal Grant). 0.00 (134,043.00) (134,043.00) 0.00 CP1023 - Aubum Ave. NE & 3rd St. NE Pedestrian Improv (State Grant 0.00 (110,000.00) (150,000.00) 40,000.00 request denied; project scope reduced). BA #6 Total 130,000.00 1,935,446.00 2,549,006.00 (483,560.00) 2014 Revised Budget 986,364.00 5,785,104.00 6,441,276.00 330,192.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 6,771,468.00 6,771,468.00 ORD.0 Page 94 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 3 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Local Street Fund ( #103) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 270,670.00 1,447,650.00 1,444,300.00 274,020.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Sales Tax from Construction (increased from $1.294M to $1.560M) 0.00 265,700.00 0.00 265,700.00 Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Funded by F103); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 36.00 (36.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CPXXXX - Local Street Improvement Program (2014 -19 TIP; 6.17.2013). 228,100.00 0.00 400,000.00 (171,900.00) BA #6 Total 228,100.00 265,700.00 427,921.00 65,879.00 2014 Revised Budget 498,770.00 1,713,350.00 1,872,221.00 339,899.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 2,212,120.00 2,212,120.00 Arterial Street Preservation Fund ( #105) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 1,584,937.00 2,042,723.00 2,000,000.00 1,627,660.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Funded by F105); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 99.00 (99.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CPXXXX - Arterial Street Preservation Program (2014 -19 TIP; 6.17.2013) 0.00 0.00 500,000.00 (500,000.00) CPXXXX - Arterial Bridge Deck Rehab (2014 -19 TIP; 6.17.2013) 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 (250,000.00) CP1225 - W. Valley Hwy System Preservation 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - Crack Seal Program (reduced project scope) 0.00 0.00 (100,000.00) 100,000.00 BA #6 Total 5,000.00 0.00 682,984.00 (677,984.00) 2014 Revised Budget 1,589,937.00 2,042,723.00 2,682,984.00 949,676.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 3,632,660.00 3,632,660.00 ORD.0 Page 95 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 4 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Drug Forfeiture Fund ( #117) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 917,468.00 281,300.00 280,915.00 917,853.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Increase budget for air cards on video cameras (previously approved BA #2; 6.17.2013) 0.00 0.00 1,440.00 (1,440.00) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 293.00 (293.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 0.00 1,733.00 (1,733.00) 2014 Revised Budget 917,468.00 251,300.00 282,645.00 916,120.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,198,768.00 1,198,768.00 Housing and Community Development Grant Fund ( #119) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 45,647.00 450,000.00 460,000.00 35,647.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 152.00 (152.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 0.00 152.00 (152.00) 2014 Revised Budget 45,647.00 450,000.00 460,304.00 35,343.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 495,647.00 495,647.00 Cumulative Reserve Fund ( #122) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 5,700,796.00 3,000.00 1,434,624.00 4,269,172.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Beginning fund balance - adjusted for 2013 transfer -in from General Fund 2,000,000.00 0.00 0.00 2,000,000.00 as authorized in BA #5 (ORD6481) Golf Course debt service administrative fees Eliminate Transfer Out to old Golf Course Debt Service Fund F417 0.00 0.00 (393,144.00) 393,144.00 New Transfer Out to new Golf Course Debt Service Fund F237 0.00 0.00 393,144.00 (393,144.00) Golf Debt Service Admin Fees (Bank of New York), transfer Out 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 (1,000.00) to general fund. Auburn Community Center (cp0925) funding Available Cumulative Reserve fund balance - transfer -out to F321 0.00 0.00 1,221,084.00 (1,221,084.00) BA #6 Total 2,000,000.00 0.00 1,222,084.00 777,916.00 2014 Revised Budget 7,700,796.00 3,000.00 2,656,708.00 5,047,088.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 7,703,796.00 7,703,796.00 ORD.0 Page 96 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 5 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Mitigation Fees Fund ( #124) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 2,456,217.00 955,185.00 426,050.00 2,985,352.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Transfer Traffic Mitigation Fees to F102 CP1218 - AWS Corridor Safety Improv. 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 (250,000.00) CP1114 -AWS & 12th St. SE Intersection Improv. 0.00 0.00 250,000.00 (250,000.00) CP1119 -AWS Corridor Improv. (Fir to Hemlock). 0.00 0.00 200,000.00 (200,000.00) TIP #40 - 124th Ave. SE Corridor Improv. Phase 1 & 2. 0.00 0.00 175,000.00 (175,000.00) CP0911 - F St. SE (4th St. SE to AWS). 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00) TIP #54 - Kersey Way SE Corridor Study. 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00) CP1023 - Aubum Ave. NE & 3rd St. NE Pedestrian Imp. 0.00 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00) TIP #41 - 124th Ave. SE Corridor Improv. Phase 2 (deleted; combine with TIP #40). 0.00 0.00 (50,000.00) 50,000.00 Transfer Park Impact Fees to F321 CPXXXX - Misc. Park Improvements. 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 (100,000.00) Transfer Out To F328 CP1315 - City Wetland Mitigation Projects. 0.00 0.00 15,790.00 (15,790.00) Downtown Property Sales Traffic Impact Fee revenue from F328 for Teutsch Development. 0.00 1,045,300.00 0.00 1,045,300.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 1,045,300.00 1,090,790.00 (45,490.00) 2014 Revised Budget 2,456,217.00 2,000,485.00 1,516,840.00 2,939,862.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,456,702.00 4,456,702.00 2010 Annex A &B Bond Debt Fund ( #230) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 158.00 1,696,520.00 1,696,520.00 158.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Continuation of sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013) Increase Transfer In from F328 - REET1. 0.00 17,675.00 0.00 17,675.00 Increase Transfer In from Facility Fund 505. 0.00 17,675.00 0.00 17,675.00 Reduced Federal Build America Bond subsidy. 0.00 (35,350.00) 0.00 (35,350.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2014 Revised Budget 158.00 1,696,520.00 1,696,520.00 158.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,696,678.00 1,696,678.00 ORD.0 Page 97 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 6 ORD.0 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 2010 C &D Local Revitalization Debt Fund ( #231) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 200.00 598,320.00 598,220.00 300.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Continuation of sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013) Increase Transfer In from F328 - REET2. 0.00 11,408.00 0.00 11,408.00 Reduced Federal Build America Bond subsidy. 0.00 (11,408.00) 0.00 (11,408.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2014 Revised Budget 200.00 598,320.00 598,220.00 300.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 598,520.00 598,520.00 2006 A & T Golf- Cemetery Fund ( #237) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Appropriation authority moved from F417 (funded by transfer in from Cumulative Resv) 0.00 393,144.00 393,144.00 0.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 393,144.00 393,144.00 0.00 2014 Revised Budget 0.00 393,144.00 393,144.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 393,144.00 393,144.00 Municipal Park Construction Fund ( #321) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 325,267.00 18,171,700.00 18,436,000.00 60,967.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Purchase of 1.15 acre parcel (Perry parcel) for Isaac Evans 0.00 30,000.00 60,000.00 (30,000.00) Park expansion, 50% funded by King County Conservation Futures grant, 50% funded from Fund 321 (Parks Prop 2 Levy). Property purchase (Rice property) located adjacent to City owned 0.00 22,500.00 45,000.00 (22,500.00) Fenster Nature Park. Transfer In from General Fund for 1/2 purchase price (Planning Department). Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CP1016 - Fenster Levee Setback (funding: King Co $90,636, 0.00 524,231.00 684,500.00 (160,269.00) federal grant $383,962; State grant $39,633; Stormwater utility $10,000). CPXXXX - Isaac Evans Park. 25,000.00 0.00 25,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - Parks Acquisition & Development. 20,000.00 0.00 20,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - Dykstra Park (moved to 2015). 0.00 0.00 (65,000.00) 65,000.00 CPXXXX - Auburndale Park II (moved to 2015). 0.00 0.00 (25,000.00) 25,000.00 CPXXXX - Misc. Park Improvements (Funding: Park impact fees). 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 CP0925 - Aubum Community Center - Eliminate placeholder budget; 0.00 (17,660,000.00) (17,660,000.00) 0.00 replace with funding plan presented below. Auburn Community Center (cp0925) funding - total $6.0M city funds; $3.0M state funds State of Washington - funding contribution 0.00 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 0.00 City funds - Transfer -in from F328 0.00 4,778,916.00 4,778,916.00 0.00 City funds - Transfer -in from F122 0.00 1,221,084.00 1,221,084.00 0.00 BA #6 Total 45,000.00 (7,983,269.00) (7,915,500.00) (22,769.00) 2014 Revised Budget 370,267.00 10,188,431.00 10,520,500.00 38,198.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 10,558,698.00 Panes AR of 4FR 10,558,698.00 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 7 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 ORD.0 Page 99 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 8 Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 4,586,304.00 1,524,819.00 1,097,300.00 5,013,823.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Continuation of sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013) Transfer out to F230 for BAB subsidy. 0.00 0.00 17,675.00 (17,675.00) Transfer out to F231 for BAB subsidy. 0.00 0.00 11,408.00 (11,408.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CP1303 - City Hall Remodel Phase 2 & 3. 438,000.00 0.00 438,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - City Sidewalk Improvements (Funding: State grant). 0.00 100,000.00 125,000.00 (25,000.00) CP0716 - City Hall HVAC System Upgrade. 99,319.00 0.00 99,319.00 0.00 CP1315 - Wetland Mitigation Proj. (Funding: Wetland mitigation fees). 0.00 15,790.00 15,790.00 0.00 CP1226 - 8th St. NE & C St. NW Intersection Improv. 5,000.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 CP1318 - Downtown Public Art (Peoples Choice Award). 8,000.00 0.00 8,000.00 0.00 Downtown Property Sales - Teutsch Development Payment of Traffic Impact Fees to F124; source: REET 2. 0.00 0.00 1,045,300.00 (1,045,300.00) Auburn Community Center (cp0925) funding transactions Adjust beginning fund balance - Annex suite 380 sale in 2013 (BA #5, ORD6481) 1,075,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,075,000.00 Downtown catalyst block sales estimated proceeds 0.00 1,500,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 Transfer -out to F321 - Suite 380 sale proceeds 0.00 0.00 1,075,000.00 (1,075,000.00) Transfer -out to F321 - Downtown catalyst block sales 0.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 (1,500,000.00) Transfer -out to F321 - Available REET1 fund balance 0.00 0.00 1,459,219.00 (1,459,219.00) Transfer -out to F321 - Available parking garage fund balance 0.00 0.00 744,697.00 (744,697.00) BA #6 Total 1,625,319.00 1,615,790.00 6,544,408.00 (3,303,299.00) 2014 Revised Budget 6,211,623.00 3,140,609.00 7,641,708.00 1,710,524.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 9,352,232.00 9,352,232.00 Golf Course Debt Service Fund ( #417) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 0.00 393,144.00 393,144.00 0.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Move Appropriation to New Golf Course DS Fund #237 0.00 (393,144.00) (393,144.00) 0.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 (393,144.00) (393,144.00) 0.00 2014 Revised Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 0.00 0.00 ORD.0 Page 99 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 8 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Water Fund ( #430) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 6,618,981.00 13,562,749.00 16,516,114.00 3,665,616.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Water Funded); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. New FTE - 1.0 Records Clerk (2% Water Funded). 0.00 0.00 1,685.18 (1,685.18) Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 33,296.79 (33,296.79) ER &R Office Assistant (22% water; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 17,060.00 (17,060.00) Emergency Management Office Asst (0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE - 0.00 0.00 8,949.20 (8,949.20) 40% water funded; BA #1; 3.04.2013). Sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 (14,705.00) 5,892.00 (20,597.00) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 11,373.00 (11,373.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CP0915 - Well 1 Improv. (Funding: PWTF loan). 1,311,914.00 1,077,945.00 2,389,859.00 0.00 CP1219 - Valley AC Main Replacement. 1,165,000.00 0.00 1,165,000.00 0.00 CP0765 - Lakeland Hills Reservoir Improv. 725,500.00 0.00 725,500.00 0.00 CP1308 - BNSF Utility Crossing. 680,000.00 0.00 680,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - West Hill Springs Improvements. 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 (150,000.00) C512A0 - Well 4 Power & Chlorination. 0.00 0.00 137,300.00 (137,300.00) C524A0 - SCADA System Improv. 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 BA #6 Total 3,982,414.00 1,063,240.00 5,453,800.17 (408,146.17) 2014 Revised Budget 10,601,395.00 14,625,989.00 21,969,914.17 3,257,469.83 Total Resources / Expenditures 25,227,384.00 25,227,384.00 Sewer Fund (#431) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 7,576,717.00 21,558,701.00 21,863,847.00 7,271,571.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Sewer Funded); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. New FTE - 1.0 Records Clerk (2% Sewer Funded). 0.00 0.00 1,685.18 (1,685.18) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 7,340.00 (7,340.00) Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 25,251.57 (25,251.57) ER &R Office Assistant (22% sewer; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 17,060.00 (17,060.00) Sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 (6,575.00) 5,892.00 (12,467.00) Emergency Management Office Asst (0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE - 0.00 0.00 3,355.95 (3,355.95) 15% sewer funded; BA #1; 3.04.2013). Move KC Metro Revenues & Expenditures to F433 (BA #1; 3.04.2013). 0.00 (14,000,000.00) (14,000,000.00) 0.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 (14,006,575.00) (13,911,530.30) (95,044.70) 2014 Revised Budget 7,576,717.00 7,552,126.00 7,952,316.70 7,176,526.30 Total Resources / Expenditures 15,128,843.00 15,128,843.00 ORD.0 Page 100 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 9 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Storm Drainage Fund ( #432) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 6,299,114.00 9,295,843.00 8,530,856.00 7,064,101.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Project Management E- Builder Software (14% Storm Funded); funded by 0.00 0.00 27,885.00 (27,885.00) Transfer Out to IT Fund. New FTE - 1.0 Records Clerk (2% Storm Funded). 0.00 0.00 1,685.18 (1,685.18) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 9,942.00 (9,942.00) Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 31,148.44 (31,148.44) ER &R Office Assistant (22% sewer; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 17,060.00 (17,060.00) Sequestration impacts (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 (5,501.00) 5,892.00 (11,393.00) Emergency Management Office Asst (0.6 FTE to 1.0 FTE - 0.00 0.00 3,355.95 (3,355.95) 15% storm; BA #1; 3.04.2013). Transfer Out Median Maintenance costs to the General Fund (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 74,000.00 (74,000.00) 0.00 Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CP1122 - 30th St. NE Area Flooding Phase 1. 1,939,588.00 0.00 1,939,588.00 0.00 CP1202 -AWS Flooding Phase 2. 1,338,000.00 0.00 1,338,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - East Ridge Manor Storm Drainage Improv. 535,000.00 0.00 535,000.00 0.00 CP1302 - BNSF Utility Crossing. 420,000.00 0.00 420,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - Vactor Decant Facility. 0.00 0.00 270,000.00 (270,000.00) CP0746 - Mill Creek. 250,000.00 0.00 250,000.00 0.00 Transfer Out To F321 CP1016 - Fenster Levee Setback. 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 (10,000.00) BA #6 Total 4,482,588.00 (5,501.00) 4,933,556.57 (456,469.57) 2014 Revised Budget 10,781,702.00 9,290,342.00 13,464,412.57 6,607,631.43 Total Resources / Expenditures 20,072,044.00 20,072,044.00 Sewer Metro Fund (#433) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund operations Continuation of previously approved requests Move KC Metro Revenues & Expenditures from F431 (BA #1; 3.04.2013) 0.00 14,000,000.00 14,000,000.00 0.00 Adjust 2014 budget for increased Metro revenues and payments to KC (parallel to 2013) 0.00 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 0.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 2014 Revised Budget 0.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 ORD.0 Page 101 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 10 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 ORD.0 Page 102 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 11 Solid Waste Fund (#434) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 596,362.00 12,062,904.00 12,497,894.00 161,372.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund operations New FTE - 1.0 Records Clerk (0.5% Solid Waste funded). 0.00 0.00 421.29 (421.29) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 996.00 (996.00) Continuation of previously approved requests Adjust budgeted revenues and expenses for King County 0.00 1,087,595.00 35,278.00 1,052,317.00 tipping fee increase and Council approved Solid Waste rates per Ordinance #6438; 11.19.2012. Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 7,134.34 (7,134.34) BA #6 Total 0.00 1,087,595.00 43,829.63 1,043,765.37 2014 Revised Budget 596,362.00 13,150,499.00 12,541,723.63 1,205,13737 Total Resources / Expenditures 13,746,861.00 13,746,861.00 Airport Fund (#435) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 544,152.00 808,380.00 867,903.00 484,629.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 466.58 (466.58) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 9.00 (9.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CPXXXX - Asphalt Rehab & Seal Coat (Funding: Federal grant $238,500 0.00 251,750.00 265,000.00 (13,250.00) & State Grant $13,250). CPXXXX - General Repair & Maint. (Funding: Federal grant). 103,000.00 37,000.00 140,000.00 0.00 CPXXXX - Wildlife Hazard Assessment (Funding: Federal 0.00 38,000.00 40,000.00 (2,000.00) grant $36,000 & State Grant $2,000). CP1221 - Airport Master Plan (reduce for portion completed in 2013). 0.00 (100,000.00) (111,500.00) 11,500.00 BA #6 Total 103,000.00 226,750.00 333,975.58 (4,225.58) 2014 Revised Budget 647,152.00 1,035,130.00 1,201,878.58 480,403.42 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,682,282.00 1,682,282.00 ORD.0 Page 102 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 11 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 Cemetery Fund ( #436) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 58,852.00 1,049,010.00 1,024,384.00 83,478.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 2,964.29 (2,964.29) Reduce budget for Office Assistant position 0.00 0.00 (78,004.00) 78,004.00 eliminated in December 2012. Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 2,045.00 (2,045.00) Project Carryforwards and Adjustments CPXXXX - Columbarium Niche Caps (project deleted; funded by Cemetery 0.00 0.00 (10,000.00) 10,000.00 operations). Adjust budgeted revenues to reflect rate increases approved 0.00 127,200.00 0.00 127,200.00 by Res.4886; 1.22.2013. BA #6 Total 0.00 127,200.00 (82,994.71) 210,194.71 2014 Revised Budget 58,852.00 1,176,210.00 941,389.29 293,672.71 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,235,062.00 1,235,062.00 Golf Course Fund (#437) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 91,134.00 1,521,430.00 1,537,577.00 74,987.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Move Appropriation authority from Golf Course Fund to General Fund (91,134.00) (1,521,430.00) (1,537,577.00) (74,987.00) BA #6 Total (91,134.00) (1,521,430.00) (1,537,577.00) (74,987.00) 2014 Revised Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 0.00 0.00 ORD.0 Page 103 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 12 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 ORD.0 Page 104 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 13 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance Fund ( #503) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 0.00 Program beginning fund balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Program Revenues Employer paid contributions 0.00 804,000.00 0.00 0.00 Employee paid contributions 0.00 36,000.00 0.00 0.00 Program Expenses Administration 0.00 0.00 115,000.00 0.00 Claims 0.00 0.00 450,000.00 0.00 Insurance and claim processing 0.00 0.00 172,000.00 0.00 Program ending fund balance (reserves) 0.00 0.00 0.00 103,000.00 BA #6 Total 0.00 840,000.00 737,000.00 103,000.00 0.00 840,000.00 737,000.00 103,000.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 840,000.00 840,000.00 Facilities Fund ( #505) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 972,003.00 3,432,500.00 3,447,704.00 956,799.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Continuation of previously approved requests Transfer out to F230 for sequestration (BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 17,675.00 17,675.00 0.00 Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 6,307.20 (6,307.20) Stratford Lot parking and Sound Transit Garage security (BA #1; 3.04.2013). 0.00 0.00 22,000.00 (22,000.00) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 3,704.00 (3,704.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 17,675.00 49,686.20 (32,011.20) 2014 Revised Budget 972,003.00 3,450,175.00 3,497,390.20 924,787.80 Total Resources / Expenditures 4,422,178.00 4,422,178.00 ORD.0 Page 104 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 13 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 ORD.0 Page 105 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 14 Innovation and Technology Fund ( #518) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 1,921,570.00 4,990,126.00 5,137,179.00 1,774,517.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Project Management E- Builder Software; Transfer In 0.00 195,195.00 195,195.00 0.00 to the IT Fund. New FTE - 1.0 Office Assistant. 0.00 0.00 79,600.00 (79,600.00) Funding for new Standby Pay Policy for on -call employees. 0.00 0.00 15,990.00 (15,990.00) New Police Vehicle per BA #3 - Technology Costs; funded by 0.00 12,600.00 12,600.00 0.00 Transfer In from General Fund. Personal Computer for new FTE - Records Clerk. 0.00 2,500.00 2,500.00 0.00 Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 31,650.24 (31,650.24) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 1,341.00 (1,341.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 210,295.00 338,876.24 (128,581.24) 2014 Revised Budget 1,921,570.00 5,200,421.00 5,476,055.24 1,645,935.76 Total Resources / Expenditures 7,121,991.00 7,121,991.00 Equipment Rental Fund ( #550) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 3,235,090.00 2,992,750.00 4,095,913.00 2,131,927.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations New FTE - 1.0 Mechanic - Salary and Benefits 0.00 0.00 84,033.71 (84,033.71) expenses offset by reducing existing budget. 0.00 0.00 (84,033.71) 84,033.71 Equipment for New Mechanic FTE - One Time Costs 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 (5,000.00) New Police Vehicle per BA #3 - Vehicle Purchase; funded by 0.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 Transfer In from General Fund. Continuation of previously approved requests ER &R Office Assistant (24% ER &R; BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 18,610.00 (18,610.00) Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 5,100.74 (5,100.74) Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 2,048.00 (2,048.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 50,000.00 80,758.74 (30,758.74) 2014 Revised Budget 3,235,090.00 3,042,750.00 4,176,671.74 2,101,168.26 Total Resources / Expenditures 6,277,840.00 6,277,840.00 ORD.0 Page 105 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 14 Schedule A Summary of 2014 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #6 Ordinance 6474 ORD.0 Page 106 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 15 Fire Pension Fund ( #611) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 2,482,786.00 73,000.00 180,860.00 2,374,926.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Continuation of previously approved requests Approved labor agreement adj (BA #1; 3.04.2013 & BA #2; 6.17.2013). 0.00 0.00 202.06 (202.06) Transfer In from General Fund to fully fund pension liability. 0.00 231,000.00 0.00 231,000.00 Worker's Compensation Self Insurance - Adjustments to L &I budget 0.00 0.00 5.00 (5.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 231,000.00 207.06 230,792.94 2014 Revised Budget 2,482,786.00 304,000.00 181,067.06 2,605,718.94 Total Resources / Expenditures 2,786,786.00 2,786,786.00 Cemetery Endowment Fund ( #701) Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 1,547,220.00 139,351.00 1,595,220.00 91,351.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) Fund Operations Continuation of previously approved requests Endowment Care Fee reduced from 15% to 10% by Ord.6447; 1.7.2013. 0.00 (16,000.00) 0.00 (16,000.00) BA #6 Total 0.00 (16,000.00) 0.00 (16,000.00) 2014 Revised Budget 1,547,220.00 107,351.00 1,595,220.00 59,351.00 Total Resources / Expenditures 1,654,571.00 1,654,571.00 Grand Total -All Funds Beg. Fund Balance 2014 Revenues 2014 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance 2014 Adopted Budget 59,000,241.00 153,945,014.00 164,654,843.00 48,290,412.00 BA #6 (Proposed Ordinance #6474) 17,748,977.00 5,231,042.00 20,436,666.90 2,543,352.10 2014 Revised Budget 76,749,218.00 159,176,056.00 185,091,509.90 50,833,764.10 Total Resources / Expenditures November 26, 2013 Prepared by City of Auburn Financial Planning Department 235,925,274.00 235,925,274.00 ORD.0 Page 106 of 465 F: \Budget Directory\2014 Budget \BA #6 - Mid Biennial Review \BA #6 - Sched A & B \BA #6 Worksheet UPDATED - Sched A and B.xlsx Page 15 Schedule B 2014 Appropriations by Fund Fund,,, 014 do ted dd t,,,; ,,, u (3e1 X474 r ),," Total Arrr�rielm� 2(114 Ftevi e i g General Fund ( #001) 58,864,112.00 10,286,516.00 10,286,516.00 69,150,628.00 Arterial Street Fund ( #102) 4,706,022.00 2,065,446.00 2,065,446.00 6,771,468.00 Local Street Fund ( #103) 1,718,320.00 493,800.00 493,800.00 2,212,120.00 Hotel Motel Fund ( #104) 165,431.00 - - 165,431.00 Arterial Street Preservation Fund ( #105) 3,627,660.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 3,632,660.00 Drug Forfeiture Fund ( #117) 1,198,768.00 - - 1,198,768.00 Housing and Community Development Grant Fund ( #119) 495,647.00 - - 495,647.00 Recreation Trails Fund ( #120) 36,691.00 - - 36,691.00 Business Improvement Area Fund ( #121) 76,720.00 - - 76,720.00 Cumulative Reserve Fund ( #122) 5,703,796.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 7,703,796.00 Mitigation Fees Fund ( #124) 3,411,402.00 1,045,300.00 1,045,300.00 4,456,702.00 1998 Library Fund ( #229) 330,354.00 - - 330,354.00 2010 Annex A &B Bond Debt Fund ( #230) 1,696,678.00 - - 1,696,678.00 2010 C &D Local Revitalization Debt Fund ( #231) 598,520.00 - - 598,520.00 LID Guarantee Fund ( #249) 34,688.00 - - 34,688.00 LID #250 ( #250) 56,762.00 - - 56,762.00 LID #350 ( #275) 7,246.00 - - 7,246.00 Golf Course Debt Service Fund ( #237) - 393,144.00 393,144.00 393,144.00 Municipal Park Construction Fund ( #321) 18,496,967.00 (7,938,269.00) (7,938,269.00) 10,558,698.00 Capital Improvements Fund ( #328) 6,111,123.00 3,241,109.00 3,241,109.00 9,352,232.00 Golf Course Debt Service Fund ( #417) 393,144.00 (393,144.00) (393,144.00) - Water Fund (#430) 20,181,730.00 5,045,654.00 5,045,654.00 25,227,384.00 Sewer Fund (#431) 29,135,418.00 (14,006,575.00) (14,006,575.00) 15,128,843.00 Storm Drainage Fund ( #432) 15,594,957.00 4,477,087.00 4,477,087.00 20,072,044.00 Sewer Metro Fund ( #433) - 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 15,000,000.00 Solid Waste Fund ( #434) 12,659,266.00 1,087,595.00 1,087,595.00 13,746,861.00 Airport Fund ( #435) 1,352,532.00 329,750.00 329,750.00 1,682,282.00 Cemetery Fund ( #436) 1,107,862.00 127,200.00 127,200.00 1,235,062.00 Golf Course Fund ( #437) 1,612,564.00 (1,612,564.00) (1,612,564.00) - Insurance Fund ( #501) 1,784,479.00 - - 1,784,479.00 Workers Compensation Self Insurance Fund ( #503) - 840,000.00 840,000.00 840,000.00 Facilities Fund ( #505) 4,404,503.00 17,675.00 17,675.00 4,422,178.00 Innovation and Technology Fund ( #518) 6,911,696.00 210,295.00 210,295.00 7,121,991.00 Equipment Rental Fund ( #550) 6,227,840.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 6,277,840.00 Fire Pension Fund ( #611) 2,555,786.00 231,000.00 231,000.00 2,786,786.00 Cemetery Endowment Fund ( #701) 1,686,571.00 (16,000.00) (16,000.00) 1,670,571.00 Total ! � 1,+55 (tO t1 ti941 t ,.T4 0 RIDTeer 26, 2013 Prepared by City of Auburn Financial Planning Department Page 107 of 465 Includes old Golf Course O &M fund New fund Closed: Move to new F237 Closed; Move to Gen Fund New fund page 16 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6489 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Agenda Bill Ord 6489 Summary Matrix Administrative Recommendation: City Council to adopt Ordinance No. 6489. Background Summary: See attached Agenda Bill. Reviewed by Council Committees: Planning And Community Development, Public Works Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 Other: Planning, Legal Councilmember: Backus Staff: Tate Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: ORD.D ORD.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 108 of 465 WASHINGTON AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject Ordinance No. 6489 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 Date: November 26, 2013 Department: Planning and Development Attachments: Budget Impact: N/A Ordinance No. 6489 Summary Table See also separate working binder Administrative Recommendation: The City Council to introduce and approve Ordinance No. 6489 Amending the Comprehensive Plan Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city- initiated docketed items) and by private citizens (privately- initiated). This year the city is initiating one map amendment and six policy /text amendments. In addition, this year the city received two privately- initiated plan map amendment applications. This staff report and its recommendations address all of this year's amendments: • CPA13 -0003, Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendment CPM #1 (city initiated) • CPA13 -0003, Policy /Text (P /T) Amendments P/T # 1 through # 7 (city initiated) • CPA13 -0001, Comprehensive Plan Map CPM #2 (privately initiated - each separately) • CPA13 -0002 Comprehensive Plan Map CPM #3 (privately initiated - each separately) Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments is limited to once a year, except in certain specific instances, and generally occurs around the end of this year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: ❑ Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: ❑ Airport ❑ Finance ❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Services ❑ Human Services ® Planning & Dev. ❑ Park Board ® Public Works ❑ Planning Comm. ❑ Other Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: ❑ M &O ❑ Mayor ❑ Parks ❑ Planning ❑ Police ❑ Human Resources ❑ Building ❑ Cemetery ❑ Finance ❑ Fire Z Legal Z Public Works Action: Committee Approval: Yes ❑No Council Approval: Yes ❑No Call for Public Hearing _/ / Referred to Until /_/ Tabled Until / / Councilmember: Backus Staff: Tate Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: Page 1 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 109 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 At its October 22, 2013 public hearing the Planning Commission reviewed the following: A. Policy /Text Amendments P/T #1 — Auburn School District 2013 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan P/T #2 — Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019 P/T #3 — Federal Way School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan P/T #4 — Kent School District 2013/2014 — 2018/2019 Capital Facilities Plan P/T #5 — City of Auburn 2014 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan P/T #6 - Comprehensive Plan Revise Chapter 3 — `Land Use' o Revise pages 3 -34 through 3 -35 and Page 3 -39 related to emphasis of industrial uses. Revise Chapter 8 — `Economic Development' o Revise pages 8 -9 through 8 -11 related to emphasis of industrial uses. Revise Chapter 14 — `Comprehensive Plan Map' o Revise page 14 -15 related to emphasis of industrial uses. B. Map Amendments CPM #1 — (File # CPA13 -0003) Amend Map No. 14.1 for a City- initiated change in the designation of three parcels developed with single family residences totaling 1.76 acres on the north side of Auburn WY S and east of Hemlock ST SE (Parcel # 2815000020, 2815000010 & 2121059073) from "High Density Residential" to "Light Commercial" for future rezoning. The designations are being re- evaluated in light of the surrounding development, evolving land use pattern, and City's planned widening of Auburn WY S. CPM #2 — (File No. CPA13 -0001) Amend Map No. 14.1 requested by Wesley Homes Lea Hill , LLC to change the designation of existing developed site and two recently acquired adjacent parcels located south of SE 320th ST, between 108th and 110th AVE SE of approx. 18.65 acres (Parcel Nos. 1721059007, 1721059253 &1721059109) The Applicant seeks to change designations of their contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" to facilitate subsequent rezoning to accommodate future expansion of existing elder care facility. CPM #3 — (File No. CPA13 -0002) Amend Map No. 14.1 requested by two adjacent property owners; Fonpee LLC and E. Stanberry of property located at the NW corner of 37th ST NW and W Valley HWY of approx. 2.10 acres (Parcel Nos. 0221049077 & 0221049098). The Applicants seek to change designations of a portion of the parcels from 'Heavy Commercial ' to 'Light Industrial' to facilitate subsequent rezoning and to eliminate split designations of each parcel and to accommodate future potential development. The Planning Commission has forwarded its recommendation for approval to the City Council on all plan map and policy /text Amendments. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments were reviewed by the Planning and Community Development Committee of the City Council on June 24, 2013 and November 12, 2013 and the Page 2of36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 110 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Committee's forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council at its November 25, 2013 regular meeting. The Public Works Committee of the City Council reviewed the amendments and the Planning Commission recommendations at their November 18, 2013 meeting. Ordinance No. 6489 is proposed for action at the December 2, 2013 City Council meeting. A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 7, 2013 deadline for the submittal of privately - initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy /text). Notice to the public of the filing deadline was provided on the City's website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list. The City received two privately- initiated plan map amendment applications by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district capital facilities plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City's Capital Facilities Plan are referenced in Chapter 5, Capital Facilities, of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy /Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) resulted in a Determination of Non - Significance (DNS) issued for the City- initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 17, 2013 (City File # SEP13- 0028). The comment period ended October 1, 2013 and the appeal period ended October 15, 2013. One comment was received and addressed and there were no appeals filed. 5. A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), the environmental review decision required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), was issued for the Wesley Homes Lea Hill LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone (File # SEP13 -0025) on September 6, 2013. The comment period ended September 20, 2013 and the appeal period ended October 4, 2013. No comment letters were received there were no appeals filed. 6. A Determination of Non - Significance (DNS), the environmental review decision required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), was issued for the Fonpee LLC & Stanberry Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone (File # SEP13 -0019) on August 26, 2013. The comment period ended September 10, 2013 and the appeal period ended September 24, 2013. No comment letters were received there were no appeals filed. 7. The Auburn School District issued a Determination of Non - Significance for the 2013 - 2019 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan May 7, 2013; the Dieringer School District issued a Determination of Non- Significance for the 2014 - 2019 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan July 15, 2013; the Federal Way School District issued a Determination of Non - Significance for the 2014 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan April 26, 2013; and the Kent School District issued a Determination of Non - Significance for the 2013/2014 through 2018/2019 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan June 13, 2013. Page 3of36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 111 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 8. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce on September 17, 2013, and in turn transmitted other state agencies as required for the 60 -day state review. The Washington State Office of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 17, 2013 by letter dated October 8, 2013. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 9. Due to the nature of the city- initiated map amendments and the scope and limited number of privately initiated policy /text changes, the optional process for a public open house as provided in the city code was not conducted. 10. Public notice via publication within the official newspaper as required by ACC 14.22.100 was accomplished. The public hearing notice was published on October 10, 2013 in the Seattle Times Newspaper at least 10 -days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 22, 2013. 11. Public notice via mailing as required by ACC 14.22.100 for site - specific map amendments was accomplished. A public notice was sent via regular mail to property owners within 300 feet of the subject sites and the property was posted with a land use notice board that included the SEPA determination. 12. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: "Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site - specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area -wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. Page 4of36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 112 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)" 13. The annual comprehensive plan amendments were previously discussed with the Planning and Community Development Committee of the City Council on June 24, 2013 at which time the draft docket and draft schedule were reviewed. Also, a reporting of the status of Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments processing occurred at the November 12, 2013 regular meeting. 14. On November 25, 2013 the Planning and Community Development Committee considered the amendments and forwarded a recommendation of approval. 15. On November 18, 2013 the Public Works Committee of the City Council reviewed the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and the recommendations of the Planning Commission. 16. On November 25, 2013 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the City Council reviewed. the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the City Council. 17. The following report identifies all of the Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) and Policy /Text (P /T) amendments that were heard by the Planning Commission at their October 22, 2013 public hearings along with the original staff recommendation to the Planning Commission and the subsequent Planning Commission recommendation. OCTOBER 22, 2013 PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING Comprehensive Plan Policy /Text Amendments P/T #1 Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2013 through 2019, adopted by School Board May 28, 2013 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2013 -2019. The CFP was adopted by the Auburn School District School Board on May 28, 2013 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Auburn School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single - family dwellings is proposed to be $5,398.93, a decrease of $112.76 and the requested fee for Page 5of36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 113 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 multiple - family dwellings is $3,387.84, an increase of $7.58. The actual impact fee that is assessed is set by separate ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council P /T #2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019 adopted July 30, 2013 by the School Board as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2014 - 2019. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on July 30, 2013. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Dieringer School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single - family dwellings is proposed to be $5,299.00, an increase of $2,294.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,766; an increase of $1,766.00. The actual impact fee assessed is set by separate ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council P/T #3 Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 adopted June 25, 2013 by the School Board into the City Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (2014). The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board on June 25, 2013. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Page 6of36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 114 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 A review of the Federal Way School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single - family dwellings is proposed to be $5,363.00, representing an increase of $1,349.00 and the requested fee for multi - family dwellings is $1,924.00, an increase of $543.00. The actual impact fee assessed is set by separate ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council P/T #4 Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2013 -2014 to 2018 -2019 adopted June 28, 2013 by the School Board into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2013 -2014 to 2018 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on June 28, 2013 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Kent School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is not requesting a change in the fees. The Plan indicates the net fee obligation for single - family dwellings of $5,486.00, representing no change, and for multi - family dwellings a fee of $3,378.00, also representing no change. The actual impact fee that is assessed is set by separate ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council CPM #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn's 6 -year Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019, into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities Page 7of36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 115 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six -year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6 -year Capital Facilities Plan 2014- 2019 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA states the following: A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six -year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element. A capital facility is a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The memo from the Finance Department contained in the working notebook identifies the major changes in the CFP from last year. The proposed City of Auburn 6 -year Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019 is incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5, Capital Facilities. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council CPM #6 Revise portions of three chapters of the City's Comprehensive Plan for the same purpose of revising the discussion of the emphasis of industrial uses. Discussion The requested policy /text amendments affect the following chapters and pages: Page 8of36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 116 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 • Revise Chapter 3 — `Land Use' o Revise pages 3 -34 through 3 -35 and Page 3 -39 related to emphasis of industrial uses. • Revise Chapter 8 — `Economic Development' o Revise pages 8 -9 through 8 -11 related to emphasis of industrial uses. • Revise Chapter 14 — `Comprehensive Plan Map' o Revise page 14 -15 related to emphasis of industrial uses. In 2005 the State of Washington adopted streamlined sales tax (SST) legislation. Prior to SST legislation, sales tax collection in Washington State was based on the site of origin, rather than on the site of destination. Under the SST tax structure, sales tax is collected at the site of delivery rather than from those areas from which they were shipped. This change in tax structure puts the City of Auburn at a disadvantage and negatively impacts its tax revenue. Specifically, Auburn and similar cities have historically invested in infrastructure to support businesses engaged in warehouse and distribution activities that ship goods to other destinations. Another concern for Auburn and similar cities that have invested in infrastructure include how the debt that has already been extended for such infrastructure will be paid and how the loss of a significant source of revenue will affect bond ratings. In November 2004 based on the then potential passage of SST, the Auburn City Council approved Resolution No. 3782. Resolution No. 3782 outlines an approach and actions the City will take related to land use planning, zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax proposal or other similar proposals that change the tax structure are adopted. (See the copy of Resolution #3782 contained in the back of the working notebook.) Because of the State of Washington's implementation of sales tax mitigation payments to cities such as Auburn, the impact resulting from streamlined sales tax has been somewhat lessened. However, the continued availability of these payments is not certain due in part to the State's current and anticipated fiscal challenges. In addition, the amount of payments does not equal the total loss in revenue to the City. The City's economic development strategies are dependent upon the City being able to continue a strong public investment program in infrastructure and services. The City's ability to continue this public investment is contingent upon maintaining solvent public revenue streams, particularly sales tax. Sales tax comprises the largest source of monies to the City's General Fund, approximately 30 percent in 2010. The City anticipates that current and long -term fiscal challenges facing the State of Washington will likely results in the dissolution of the current sales tax revenue mitigation program. The eventual loss of the aforementioned sales tax revenue will directly and adversely affect the City's ability to adequately fund the capital infrastructure and services necessary to support the realization of the City's economic development strategies. This is especially applicable to industrial areas supporting warehouse and distribution centers that are origin -based in nature. In 2011, the City amended the City's Comprehensive Plan to identify that warehouse and distribution land uses are not a preferred long -term economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas in the City due to the loss of sales tax revenue associated with the State's implementation of streamlined sales tax legislation, no substantive contribution to an increase in per capita income for Auburn residents, no reduction in the tax burden of Auburn residents, low employment densities, lower property values and land use inefficiencies. Page 9of36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 117 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 These changes specified that increases in manufacturing and industrial land uses should be the City's preferred economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas of the City currently dominated by warehouse and distribution land uses. These changes specified that the City should revise current comprehensive policies and regulations to provide for and require the conversion of existing warehouse and distribution land uses to manufacturing and industrial land uses. To implement the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan, the zoning regulations affecting industrial zoning districts was changed by Ordinance #6433 near the end of 2012. Among other more minor changes, the Ordinance established that any new or expansion of existing warehouse and distribution uses in the City would require the land use application process of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Since the time of these comprehensive plan and zoning changes, the City heard from a number of property owners and property management companies responsible for warehouse and distribution facilities located in the City expressing concern. The majority of concerns expressed were related to misunderstanding the effect of the changes to pre- existing warehouse and distribution uses. However, as a result of these comprehensive plan and zoning changes, the property owners, property managers and their professional organizations of warehouse and distribution uses have supported and advocated for the City with the state legislature. As a result of this support, it is appropriate to revise and "soften" the policy direction of the Comprehensive Plan to promote and encourage through incentives the transition from warehousing and distribution uses rather than require the conversion of these uses. The proposed policy and text changes are proposed for this purpose. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments CPM #1 CPA13 -0003, Auburn WY S & Hemlock ST SE City initiated Map Amendment Amend Map No. 14.1 for a City- initiated change in the designation of three parcels developed with single family residences totaling 1.76 acres on the north side of Auburn WY S and east of Hemlock ST SE (Parcel # 2815000020, 2815000010 & 2121059073) from "High Density Residential" to "Light Commercial" for future rezoning. The designations are being re- evaluated in light of the surrounding development, evolving land use pattern, and City's planned widening of Auburn WY S. Page 10 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 118 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Discussion 1. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land uses of the 3 sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Page 11 of 36 ORD.D B „ 3 THAN YOU 1. tag E 19 of 465 Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On- Site "High Density Residential " R5, Residential (5 dwelling units per acre) Each contains a single family residence North "Single Family Residential" & "Public and Quasi-Public" R5, Residential (5 dwelling units per acre) & P1, Public Use single family residences & open space as Shaughnessy Park South "Light Commercial" with "Moderate Density Residential ", beyond 01, Light Commercial with R10, Residential (10 dwelling units per acre), beyond Convenience store, single family residence, vacant East "High Density Residential " & "Light Commercial" R20, Residential (20 dwelling units per acre) & 01, Light Commercial Veterinary clinic, restaurant, & multi- tenant commercial center Warehouse, multi- tenant commercial center West "Single Family Residential" & "Neighborhood Commercial" M1, Light Industrial with R5, (5 dwelling units to the acre) beyond Vacant & single family residential Page 11 of 36 ORD.D B „ 3 THAN YOU 1. tag E 19 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 2013 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPA 13 -0003 - PROPOSED ILI basting Land Use Proposed Land use Land Use Designations ' 1 Residential Conservancy Page 12 of 36 ORD.D Single- Family Residential Moderate Density Residential High Density Residential Office Residential { Neighborhood Commercial Light Industrial {r mJ Auburn City Limits Parcels Light Commercial Illllllllullllf - Heavy Industrial j' Public and Quasi- Public Open Space AUBU N O ftE THAN YOU 1 ag 120 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 2. This city- initiated proposal consists of changing the designation of the following three contiguous properties: • 3202 Auburn WY S, Parcel # 2815000020, 0.19 acres owned by John Tippins • 3210 Auburn WY S, Parcel # 2815000010, 0.51 acres owned by Coni Orvis • 3216 Auburn WY S, parcel # 2121059073, 1.06 acres owned by Khanh Tran The combined area of the three subject parcels is approximately 1.76 acres. 3. All three sites border Auburn WY S, which is State Route 164 and classified by the City as a "Principal Arterial" which prescribes a five -lane road with a minimum 87 feet of right -of -way. The roadway is not currently constructed to this road standard. 4. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn. It was annexed to the City in 1959 by Ordinance No. 1278. 5. The properties occur at an elevation of approximately 308 feet. The properties are similar in elevation to the roadway Auburn WY S and relatively flat except near the northern boundary which slopes downhill to the north. 6. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties were originally zoned R2, Single Family Residential (6,000 square foot minimum lot size) and subsequently changed in 1987 to R1, Single Family Residential (8,000 square foot minimum lot size) under the old zoning code classification system. Then in 2009 the City amended its zoning code and changed the R1, Single Family Residential (8,0000 square foot minimum lot size) to R5, Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre), the current designation of these properties. 7. The land use designations and zoning for the subject properties have not been re- evaluated for many years and therefore have not considered the appropriateness of the land use designations based on the increased development along the roadway corridor. The subject properties have been impacted by added development, intensification of commercial uses and increased traffic along the Auburn WY S corridor. The corridor has been impacted by the development and expansions of the Muckleshoot Casino and Bingo Hall and the construction and operation of the White River Amphitheater. In the immediate vicinity, there has been further development on both sides of Auburn WY S. Immediately to the east of the three subject properties, also on property zoned C1; Light Commercial, is a veterinary hospital and pet grooming business. East of the veterinary hospital is a drive through restaurant. And east of the drive through restaurant is a newer multi- tenant commercial center. 8. Auburn WY S has experienced increases in traffic volumes. According to the City's 1997 Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the year 1996 average daily vehicle trip volumes were 29,183 on Auburn WY S in this vicinity of Hemlock ST SE. According to the city's current Comprehensive Transportation Plan, the year 2009 average daily vehicle trips are 35,986 in this same road segment; a 23% increase over a period of 13 years. 9. There are three City roadway improvement projects currently under design on the Auburn WY S corridor between the Muckleshoot Plaza Drive (Tribal Casino area) and Hemlock ST SE: Page 13 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 121 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 • CP1218 — Auburn Way South from Muckleshoot Plaza Drive to Dogwood ST SE, construction in 2015 • CP1118 — Auburn Way South from Dogwood ST SE to Fir ST SE, construction in 2014 • CP1119 — Auburn Way South from Fir ST SE to Hemlock ST SE, construction in 2014 The projects are all intended to improve vehicle and pedestrian safety while also reducing congestion. 10. Project CP1119 includes the widening of Auburn Way South at Hemlock ST SE to include two lanes in each direction and a center turn lane. Sidewalks will also be added to both sides of the road. Currently at Hemlock ST SE, Auburn WY S is one lane in each direction with a center turn lane and without sidewalks. Project CP1119 is funded by a grant from the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT), and the City of Auburn. Construction on CP1119 and CP1118 is scheduled to start in early 2014 and last approximately 10 months. 11. Approximately 13 feet of additional right of way width is needed for project CP1119 on the north side of Auburn Way South, east of Hemlock ST SE. in the vicinity of the subject properties. 12. In terms of the status of the projects, the City is currently negotiating with property owners for the acquisition of right -of -way needed for project CP1119. The City is also finalizing design documents, working to obtain final design approvals from partners and stakeholders (WSDOT and MIT). The City is also coordinating with Puget Sound Energy to underground overhead power lines. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council CPM #2 — CPA13 -0001, Wesley Homes Lea Hill LLC Map Amendment 1. The Comprehensive Plan map amendment application (File No. CPA13 -0001) was submitted on June 6, 2013 by the submittal deadline of June 7, 2013. 2. The application was submitted by Daniel K. Balmelli, Executive Vice President, and Paul Cyr, Senior Planner, of Barghausen Consulting Engineers Inc. as agents on behalf of Kevin Anderson, President & Chief Executive Officer, Wesley Homes Lea Hill LLC, Applicant. 3. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application, the Applicant also submitted an environmental checklist application (File No. SEP13 -0025) and a rezone application (File No. REZ13- 0001). The Applicant also provided an application for amendment of the previous Conditional Use Permit (File No. CUP13 -0002) to provide Page 14 of 36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 122 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 redundancy for the future skilled nursing facility in the event the comprehensive plan amendment and rezone are not successful. 4. The Comprehensive Plan map amendment application seeks to change the designation of existing developed site and two more recently acquired adjacent parcels (three (3) parcels total) located south of SE 320th ST, between 108th and 110th AVE SE and totaling approximately 18.65 acres (Parcel Nos. 1721059007, 1721059253 &1721059109) from "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" to facilitate subsequent rezoning to accommodate future expansion of existing elder care facility. 5. As indicated by the Applicant's narrative submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of changing the land use designation of the property to ensure the ability for future redevelopment. More specifically, the comprehensive plan map amendments and rezones are requested for the purpose of facilitating the site preparation and construction of a 36 -bed, skilled nursing facility as a building addition to the existing main building on the main parcel. History of Existing Development 6. The following information on the existing Wesley Homes Lea Hill Senior Living Facility" is derived primarily from the application materials. The approximately 18.38 -acre campus is accessed by a north -south private street (109th Place SE) extending south from SE 320th Street leading to the site buildings. The central portion of the site contains trees, wetlands and a stream that were preserved or enhanced at the time of development. The site buildings, access, and parking areas were developed around these on -site resources. "Eby Lodge ": The north central portion of the site contains the main, three -story building containing approximately 128 residential apartments, dining room, and rooms for specific activities, such as theater, game room, wood shop, chapel, beauty salon, and fitness center. The building also contains underground parking and a secure wing for individuals living with memory impairment. "Village Homes" — The east side and south sides of the site are bordered by a row of 22 single story homes, primarily as duplexes, that provide an independent living situation. "Brownstones " — The southwest corner of the site contains two, two -story buildings with underground parking and approximately 12 apartment homes in each building. 7. In 2004, the Applicant, Kevin Anderson of Wesley Homes, submitted 3 applications to the City: a. A rezone application (File # REZ04 -0004) was submitted to change from R1, Single Family Residential (8,000 square foot minimum lot size) to R2, Single Family Residential (6,000 square foot minimum lot size). The vicinity is also subject to the Lea Hill zoning overlay whose main purpose is continuing some of the King County development standards for previously platted property within this annexed area. The rezone was needed because nursing homes /assisted living uses were not allowed in the R1 zoning district but were allowed in the R2 zoning district through a conditional use permit (CUP). The zoning designations have subsequently changed by the city. Page 15 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 123 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 b. A Conditional Use permit application (File # CUP04 -0004) was submitted since at the time, the land use approval required to authorize nursing homes /assisted living uses in the City's R2, Single Family Residential (6,000 square foot minimum lot size) zoning district. The Conditional Use Permit authorizes a specific site plan and, in this case, also authorized a building height variance of six feet to increase the height of the main building to 36 feet. c. An environmental checklist application (File # SEP04 -0020) was submitted for the state — required analysis of the environmental impacts and city decision on the proposed land use changes and the proposed development. 8. In response to the applications received in 2004, the City issued a Final Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance (Final MDNS) (File # SEP04 -0020) on August 31, 2004. The Final MDNS contained seven conditions in order to reduce or avoid environmental impacts. While not identified as part of the proposed action at the time, the environmental checklist application acknowledged that a future phase to add a skilled nursing facility as part of the project. 9. Also in response to the applications received in 2004, the City's Hearing Examiner on September 21 2004 conducted a public hearing on the on the rezone and conditional use permit (and variance). After the hearing, the Hearing Examiner recommended approval to the city Council. The City Council on November 15 2004 considered the request and adopted Ordinance No. 5881 approving the rezone and Conditional Use Permit with five conditions. 10. Construction permits were applied for in 2005 and the site development was generally completed in 2006. At the time of construction, the two smaller parcels were not owned by Wesley Homes and contained single family residences. The two smaller parcels were subsequently acquired by Wesley Homes. 11. In 2009 the city amended its zoning code and changed the R1, Single Family Residential (8,0000 square foot minimum lot size) to R5, Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre) and changed the R2, Single Family Residential (8,0000 square foot minimum lot size) to the R7, Residential (seven (7) dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. The City also changed the set of uses allowed in the zoning districts such that the R7, Residential (Seven (7) dwelling units per acre) zoning designation does not allow nursing homes /assisted living facilities in this zoning district. By this change, the Wesley Home project was made a legally - established use that is non - conforming to the use regulations. Page 16 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 124 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 12. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land uses of the sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Page 17 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 125 of 465 Current Comprehensive PIan Current Zoning Current Land Use ite Lrrcetion Main Parcel: 1721059007 Smaller Parcels; 1 721 059253 &1721059109, Main Parcel. 1721059007: Smaller Parcels; 1721 059253 &1721059109 Main Parcel: 1721059007 Smaller Parcels; 1721 059253 &1721.059109 On -site "Single Family Residential" R7, Residential (seven (7) dwelling units per acre) R5, Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre) Senior/ Assisted Living Facility One is vacant; one contains a SF residence North "Single Family Residential" R5 Residentia dwelling units (Five (5) per acre) Single family residential South "Single Family Residential" R5 Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre) Single family residential East "Single Family Residential" R5 Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre) Single family residential West "Single Family Residential" R5 Residential (Five (5) dwelling units per acre) Single family residential Page 17 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 125 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 2013 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPA13 -0001 EXISTING PROPOSED, Dust rig Land Use Pmpmed land use Land Use Designations Residential Conservenc Page 18 of 36 ORD.D Single- Fatuity Residential dente Density Residemia High Density Resider,. Office Residential IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Neighborhood femme Light Commercial Heavy Commercial Downtown II ght Industrial oilll Auburn City Lirmtr 111. IlAIIm Hea•rylndistial Public and Quasi- Public Open Space AUBURN . Parcels �ii llQt( f OldE THAN YOU 1 ' NEl 126 age 26 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 13. The request seeks to change the designation of the existing developed site and two more recently acquired adjacent parcels (three (3) parcels total) and totaling approximately 18.65 acres (Parcel Nos. 1721059007, 1721059253 &1721059109) from "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" to facilitate subsequent rezoning to accommodate future expansion of existing assisted living facility. The parcels requested for change are contiguous and generally rectangular in shape. 14. All three parcels border S 320th Street, which is classified by the city as a "Residential Collector" street which prescribes either 2 or 3 lanes and a 55 -foot wide right -of -way. Two blocks to the east the same roadway classification changes to a "Minor Arterial" street which prescribes a minimum 71 -foot right -of -way. S. 320th Street along the project frontage is generally improved on the south side of the road. The existing assisted living facility is also bordered to the east by 110th Ave SE, which is classified as a "Local Residential" street which prescribes 2 lanes within a 50 -foot wide right -of -way. A private street of 108th Avenue SE borders to the west. 15. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn and is located within an area that was annexed to the city in the year 2000 by City ordinance No. 5346. 16. The 2 smaller parcels, to the north side of the assisted living facility have been zoned R1, Single Family Residential (8,000 square foot minimum lot size) from annexation in 2000 until the zoning was changed to R5 in 2009, as previously mentioned. 17. The eastern of the 2 smaller parcels (Parcel # 1721059109 — 10925 SE 320th St) contains an existing single family house. The western of the 2 smaller parcels (Parcel # 1721059253 — 10815 SE 320th St) is vacant. The previous single family house has been removed. Process and Criteria for Requested Amendment 18. The purpose of the City's Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code section: "ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. " 19. The City code provides certain criteria for decisions for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: "ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and /or relates to the following decision criteria: Page 19 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 127 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and /or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region." 20. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. The Comprehensive Plan contains the following policy guidance that relate to this application. Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map, starting at page 14 -8 provides the following purpose and description of the `Public and Quasi - Public" Comprehensive Plan designation: Page 20 of 36 ORD.D "Public and Quasi- Public Purpose: To designate areas of significant size needed to provide public and quasi - public services to the community. Description: This category includes those areas which are reserved for public or quasi - public uses of a developed character. It is intended to include those of a significant extent, and not those smaller public uses which are consistent with and may be included in another designation. Public uses of an industrial character, such as the General Services Administration, are included in the industrial designation. Streets, utilities and other public activities supporting other uses are not considered separate uses and are not so mapped. This designation includes large churches, private schools and similar uses of a quasi - public character. Developed parks are also designated under this category. Compatible Uses: Uses more appropriately designated under another category should not be designated under this category, irrespective of ownership. Industrial and commercial uses which are affiliated with and managed by educational institutions for vocational educational purposes may be classified as a public use and permitted on a conditional basis. Criteria for Designation: Designation of these areas should be consistent with the character of adjacent uses. Appropriate Implementation: This designation will generally be implemented by three zones: AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 128 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 1) P -1 (Public Use) District provides for the location and development of public uses that serve the cultural, educational, recreational and public service needs of the community. 2) I (Institutional Use) District provides for similar uses, but includes schools and typically allows a much broader list of uses. 3) LF (Landing Field) District provides for the operation and management of the Auburn Municipal Airport. The designation can also be implemented as a conditional use under various zones. Approval of these types of uses (and open space uses), not individually designated on the Plan Map, under a conditional use permit or rezone consistent with or related to adjacent zoning, shall not be considered inconsistent with the designations under this Plan." (Emphasis added) The request to change the designation of the 3 parcels to "Public and Quasi - Public" is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The properties are developed with or adjacent to properties with land uses of a quasi - public character (the assisted living facility). For comparison, Chapter 14, "Comprehensive Plan Map ", starting at page 14 -3 provides the following purpose and description of the `Single Family Residential' Comprehensive Plan designation: Page21 of 36 ORD.D "Single Family Purpose: To designate and protect areas for predominantly single family dwellings. Description: This category includes those areas reserved primarily for single family dwellings. Implementing regulations should provide for an appropriate range of lot sizes, clustered and mixed housing types as part of a planned development. Compatible Uses: Single family residences and uses that serve or support residential development, such as schools, daycare centers, churches and parks shall be considered appropriate and may be permitted on a conditional basis. Other public buildings and semi - public uses may be permitted if designed and laid out in a manner which enhances rather than detracts from the residential character of the area. In siting such uses, however, special care shall be given to ensuring adequate parking, landscaping, and traffic circulation with a minimum of conflict with residential uses. Uses which generate significant traffic (such as large churches) should only locate on developed arterials in areas zoned for institutional uses. Intrusion of industrial uses into any of these single family areas shall be prohibited. Only very limited commercial uses such as home occupations or strictly limited appropriate conditional uses can be allowed. Planned developments should be favorably considered in these designations in order to allow optimal flexibility. In providing such flexibility, the emphasis should be on small alley- loaded lot single family development, limited low density AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 129 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Page 22 of 36 ORD.D multifamily housing and a mixture of types, and design diversity should be sought. Except where conditional use permits have been previously granted, alternate structure types should not exceed more than 40 percent of the units, and alternative structures should in most cases contain no more than four dwelling units each. However, where substantial offsetting community benefits can be identified, such alternative structures may be allowed to contain more than three units each. Criteria for Designation: Areas suitable for this designation include those areas designated in goals and policies of this Plan as single family areas. Consistent with those policies, areas within the Community Serving Area of the City suitable for this category should be reserved for these uses. This designation should also be applied to areas adjacent to lower density residential plan designations. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: This designation would not be generally appropriate (although exceptions may exist) in the following areas: 1. Areas with high volumes of through traffic. 2. Areas developed in or more appropriate under the Plan policies for another use. 3. Areas within the Region Serving Area of the City. Appropriate Implementation: Three zones may be used to implement this category: 1) R -1: Permits one dwelling unit per net acre. This zone is primarily applied to areas designated as urban separators under the King County Countywide Planning Policies where rezones from existing densities (typically one unit per acre) are not allowed for a 20 year period and /or to areas with significant environmental constraints. It may also be applied in limited instances to areas where greater densities are limited by environmental constraints. 2) R -5: Permits 4 -5 dwelling units per net acre. This zone is intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single family dwellings. Duplexes are conditionally permitted subject to meeting infill residential design standards. It is intended to be applied to the relatively undeveloped portions of the City, areas where existing development patterns are consistent with the density and upland areas where greater densities would strain the transportation system. 3) R -7: Permits 5 -7 dwelling units per net acre. This zone provides for relatively small lot sizes. It may be applied to the older neighborhoods of the City and reflects the typically smaller lot sizes found there. Application of this zone should be considered for areas considered appropriate for a mix of housing types, particularly in some of the Special Planning Areas as discussed below. AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 130 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 The current designation of the 3 parcels is 'Single Family Residential' and is proposed to change to "Public and Quasi - Public'. The properties are either: vacant, developed with single family residence, or developed with an assisted living facility. The existing character as an assisted living facility more closely matches the proposed designation. This change in designation is appropriate in proximity to the surrounding areas that are designated "Single Family Residential'. The request to change, does not adversely affect the integrity of the remaining area of Single Family Residential'. 21. Also, in Chapter 3, Land Use, the Comprehensive Plan document provides various policies which relate to this request. Several policies promote additional residential development in order to meet community and growth management goals. The following excerpted policies relate to this requested change to "Public and Quasi - Public ": "Chapter 3, Land Use GOAL 7. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT To emphasize housing development at single family densities, in order to reestablish a mix of housing types appropriate for a family oriented community, while recognizing the need and desire for both lower density and higher density housing appropriately located to meet the housing needs of all members of the community. Objective 7.1. To establish a system of residential densities that accommodates a range of housing choices appropriate for the city. Policies: LU -13 The City should promote the provision, preservation and maintenance of adequate housing for the city's residents by encouraging a balanced mix of housing types and values appropriate to the income levels and lifestyles of area residents. Auburn has always been willing to accept its "fair share" of low and moderate cost housing opportunities. However, this has translated into a great disparity in Puget Sound communities with cities such as Auburn receiving more of these types of housing than other comparable communities. This has had impacts in terms of the costs of meeting human service needs as well as some poorly maintained multifamily properties which have caused a variety of problems. Auburn will work to insure that housing units are equitably distributed across the region in terms of both physical location and cost." (Emphasis added) While the request seeks to change the designation of the property to "Public and Quasi - Public' when developed as an assisted living campus, Goal 7 and Policy LU -13 of the Comprehensive Plan recognizes the important role that these quasi - public facilities such as assisted living facilities contribute to residential neighborhoods. The proposal fulfils the goal of providing a range of housing styles so that residents can remain in the community as they advance in age and not have to go outside the community to find suitable housing for their life stage. Also, this change facilitates the existing assisted living facility -- the neighborhood already contains this land use - -it is not a new land use for the vicinity. Page 23 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 131 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 "GOAL 12. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT To encourage redevelopment of underutilized areas to reduce sprawl and take full advantage of the City's investment in existing infrastructure. Objective: 12.1 To facilitate infill development. Policies: LU -117 Encourage well designed infill and redevelopment projects to fully utilize previous investment in existing infrastructure in the single family residential, moderate density residential, and high density residential designated areas of the City. "(Emphasis added) The requested change is to facilitate further development of the assisted living facility and build upon the significant existing capital investment in the site. Redevelopment of the 2 smaller sites capitalizes on the existing location that is appropriate and accessible and serves the neighborhood and community. The assisted living facility is bordered by a "residential collector" street (S 320th ST) and a "local residential" street (110th Ave SE). 22. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. The proposed application for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning has been reviewed by the Fire Agency and the City's Utilities and Traffic divisions. Based on these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. The proposal is a non - project action; the proposed application is for a change in the comprehensive plan designation and zoning. The proposed "project action" for physical development of the assisted living facility has been addressed in the city's environmental review and final Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). The proposed change if approved, will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As noted by the Applicant in the "Written Statement in Support of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment ", the existing site is served by adequate public services the change is not expected to result in an increased demand that will negatively diminish services or the ability to provide services. As typical with development in the City, the infrastructure improvements needed to serve the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services are required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. So, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. 23. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, a change to the mapped configuration of the land use designations of this request is logical (a change to Map No. 14.1). The 3 parcels are surrounded by areas designated: "Single Family Residential ". So Page 24 of 36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 132 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 while the proposed change represents a change from the surrounding areas, it is of a use and scale that warrants a change to the comprehensive plan map beyond the property boundaries. While not "invalid" the change more accurately reflects the current development pattern and reduces potential conflicts and provides more logical boundaries as they are proposed to be separated by public rights -of -way. 24. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Changes that have occurred since the time of adoption of the city's GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan in 1995 is that Wesley Homes has developed the assisted living facility and the city has implemented new zoning standards. Another change is that Wesley Homes has acquired the two adjacent properties abutting the existing parcel. 25. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA)(RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and "Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region ". The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and "Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region ". The proposal is consistent because enhances the general goal of providing public facilities concurrently with the needs of education and residential development. 26. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.) As noted in response to other criteria above, growth and development has continued within Lea Hill area of Auburn. The development has included the development of the Wesley Homes Lea Hill Assisted living facility that was not contemplated in 1995 when the city adopted it GMA - compliant Comprehensive Plan. Another change, is the city has implemented new zoning standards that make assisted living facility uses not allowed in the R7, Residential (seven (7) dwelling units per acre) zoning designation. Another change is that Wesley Homes Lea Hill LLC has acquired the two adjacent properties abutting their existing parcel since the time of establishment of the comprehensive plan designations and Wesley Homes Lea Hill LLC seeks to make uniform the designations of all their parcels. Based on these, there have been changes which meet the criteria of Item b. Page 25 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 133 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council CPM #3 — CPA13 -0002, Fonpee LLC and Stanberry Map Amendment 1. The applicant submitted a Comprehensive Plan map amendment application on June 7, 2013 by the submittal deadline of June 7, 2013. 2. The application was submitted by Mike Cotter, President of Fonpee LLC, as owner of one property and as an agent on behalf of the other property owner, Edwin Stanberry. The property owners are co- applicants. 3. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application, the Applicants also submitted an environmental checklist application (File No. SEP13 -0019) and a rezone application (File No. REZ13- 0002). 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the designation of two adjacent parcels located at the northwest corner of 37th ST NW and W Valley Hwy N. The northern property (3719 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049077) is owned by Edwin Stanberry. The southern property (3705 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049098) is owned by Fonpee LLC. 5. Both properties have split comprehensive plan designations; the western portion of each is "Light Industrial "; the eastern part is "Heavy Commercial ". The combined area of change from 'Heavy Commercial ' to 'Light Industrial' is approximately 2.10 acres. 6. As indicated by the Applicant's narrative submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of bringing the entirety of both properties under the same land use designation to ensure the ability for future redevelopment. Fonpee LLC, operating as Omega USA Company is a "building contractor" business and has plans for further development of the southern lot to include a future office building and a future building for storage of vehicles. While this further future development is capable of being done under the C3, Heavy Commercial (office uses and parking structures are allowed) it is complicated by being subject to different development standards. Mr. Stanberry does not have specific plans for redevelopment of his property. Page 26 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 134 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 7. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land uses of the sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Page 27 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU t. 'NED age 135 of 465 Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use northern property (3719 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049077) is owned by Edwin Stanberry southern property (3705 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049098) is owned by Fonpee LLC. On- Site West: "Light Industrial ", East: "Heavy Commercial" M1, Light Industrial & C3, Heavy Commercial Single family house Building contractor North "Light Industrial" C3, Heavy Commercial Trucking company, construction contractor, vacant parcel South "Heavy Commercial" and "Single Family Residential" C3, Heavy Commercial & R5, (5 dwelling units per acre) Warehouse multi- tenant commercial center & single family residences East "Heavy Commercial" C3, Heavy Commercial Multi- tenant commercial center, freight terminal modular home manufacturer West Single Family Residential" M1, Light Industrial with R5, (5 dwelling units to the acre) beyond Single family residential Page 27 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU t. 'NED age 135 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13-0001, CPA13-0002, & CPA13-0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 2013 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPA13-0002 111111111mohil 11111111 rbri 11:1:1:111111ir V'lll'111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111!,,[,„,,,,,11,:"„ '1111111111111111iihiiil.11,,j1,:„„„„„„ \ 1, PROPOSED 11111111101110101 ovoloolooloolooloolool0000000000000000l fip11)))))))))))))))))))))))))1", 1111111i1111111111110Ivu' fyisting Land Use Residential. Conserver, Single-Family Residential Moderate Density Residential Page 28 of 36 ORD.D 1111111111111111111 red High Density Residential Office Residential. Neighborhood Commercial Light Cornmercial He, Commercial ili Downtown Light Industrial He, Industrial. Public and Quasi-Public Open Space Auburn City Limits AUBURN * na" 11191=1__maimuo__uu= 0111 THAN YOU IMINE36 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Page 29 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 137 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Process and Criteria for Requested Amendment 8. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the designation of two adjacent parcels; the northern property (3719 VV Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049077)) owned by Edwin Stanberry consists of 3.29- acres. The southern property (3705 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049098)) owned by Fonpee LLC consists of 5.59 acres. 9. Due to the split designation, the portion of both properties requested for change is approximately 2.10 acres. 10. The two properties are roughly rectangular in shape with the longer axis oriented east -west and measuring approximately 1,081 feet. 11. The northern property the northern property (3719 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel No. 0221049077)) owned by Edwin Stanberry contains a single family house. The southern property (3705 W Valley Hwy N (Parcel # 0221049098)) owned by Fine LLC site is developed with three buildings as a building contractor. 12. Both sites are bordered to the east by developed W. Valley Highway N. which is classified by the City as a "Principal Arterial" which prescribes a five -lane road with 87 feet of right -of- way. The southern property borders 37th St NW, which is classified as a "Residential Collector" street which prescribes either 2 or 3 lanes and a 55 -foot wide right -of -way. 13. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn. It was annexed to the City in 1971 by Ordinance No. 2605. 14. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties were zoned UNCL, Unclassified from the time of annexation up until 1987 and then were changed to the split designations of M1, Light Industrial and C3, Heavy Commercial. The zoning boundaries originally followed parcel boundaries that have since been modified or eliminated through combining lots. 15. The properties are part of the transition in grade from the western hillside to the valley floor and a north -south aligned stream borders the western boundary of both properties. 16. As indicated by the Applicants in the narrative submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of changing the land use designation of the property to ensure a consistent designation across each site for future redevelopment. 17. The purpose of the City's Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code section: "ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. " 18. The City code provides certain criteria for decisions for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: Page 30 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 138 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 "ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and /or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and /or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region." 19. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. The Comprehensive Plan contains policy guidance that relate to this application. Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map, starting at page 14 -14 provides the following purpose and description of the 'Light Industrial' Comprehensive Plan designation: "Light Industrial Purpose: To reserve quality industrial lands for activities that implement the City's economic development goals and policies. Description: This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of industrial and commercial uses. This designation is intended to provide a location attractive for manufacturing, processing and assembling land use activities that benefit from quality surroundings and appropriate commercial retail uses that benefit from the location, access, physical configuration, building types of these properties. It is distinguished from heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant activities shall take place inside buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictly controlled and permitted only as an incidental part of another use. The siting and design of industrial buildings shall be of an "industrial or business park" character. Certain residential uses may be permitted, especially in industrial areas that have been established to promote a business park environment that complements environmental features, and /or if development standards are developed to promote compatibility between residential and other non - residential land uses. Compatible Uses: A wide range of industrial and heavy commercial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. These uses include indoor manufacturing, processing and assembling of materials from previously prepared or raw materials and ancillary and necessary warehousing and distribution of finished goods associated with Page 31 of 36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 139 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 manufacturing and industrial uses. Certain residential uses may be permitted if development standards are established to promote compatibility between residential and other non - residential land uses. Outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with adjacent uses and so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be extensively screened. In the Environmental Park District that implements the "Light Industrial" plan map designation; outdoor storage will be strictly limited to promote compatibility with adjacent environmental land uses. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials as well as substantial emissions should not be permitted in these areas. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed to provide increased opportunities for sales tax revenue. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Auburn Yard located within the Railroad Special Plan Area is considered a compatible use at its current level of usage (as of August 14, 1996). It is not bound by the policies concerning outside storage under the existing light industrial designation as it was an existing use prior to the development of this policy. Should BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to upgrade the yard to an intermodal facility, the proposal will be subject to the essential public facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 5). To ensure the City's long -term ability to invest in public infrastructure and services remains viable, the City must pursue implementation of policies that incentivize the transition of current and future land uses in its industrial zones away from distribution and warehouse uses. The City believes that manufacturing and industrial land uses should over time largely replace warehouse and distribution land uses currently existing in the City and that any future warehouse and distribution uses should be ancillary to and necessary for the conduct of manufacturing and industrial uses. Manufacturing and industrial uses are more appropriate and beneficial through higher and better use of the land, enhanced employment densities, increased property tax revenues and potential on -site sales tax revenue generation for receipt of materials and other goods and services. The establishment of regulations and incentives that create a basis for increased commercial retail uses in the City's industrial zoning districts will provide greater opportunity for the generation of sales tax revenue in the City. Increased sales tax revenue will positively impact the City's continued ability to maintain and operate a strong public investment program in infrastructure and services. Commercial retail uses will in turn be attracted to and benefit from the location, access, physical configuration and building types of industrial zoned properties. Criteria for Designation: This designation should be applied to a majority of the Region Serving Area designated under this Plan. It is particularly appropriate for industrial land within high visibility corridors. This category should separate heavy industrial areas from other uses. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Within the Community Serving Area, this designation should only be applied to sites now developed as light industrial Page 32 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 140 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 sites. Industrial sites along rail corridors are generally more appropriate for heavier industrial uses, unless in high visibility corridors. Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the Light Industrial (M -1), Environmental Park (EP) or Business Park (BP) zone." (Emphasis added) Consistent with this discussion in the Comprehensive Plan, the properties are adjacent to other properties designated "Light Industrial" by the Comprehensive Plan (on -site and off - site) and adjacent to properties already developed with light industrial uses. The site is separated by hillside from residential uses. The site is also located in the regional - serving area. The location of the properties is ideally suited for light- industrial uses. The property can be served with high capacity and high quality public services and facilities. The southern parcel has recently completed street frontage improvements. The properties have frontage and access to West Valley Hwy N classified as a "principal arterial" in the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan or 37th Street NW. The location provides proximity to W Valley Hwy N with access to SR 167 at S 277th Street and to SR 18. 20. For comparison, Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map, starting at page 14 -11 provides the following purpose and description of the `Heavy Commercial' Comprehensive Plan designation: "Heavy Commercial Purpose: To provide automobile oriented commercial areas to meet both the local and regional need for such services. Description: This category is intended to accommodate uses which are oriented to automobiles either as the mode or target of providing the commercial service. The category would also accommodate a wide range of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or heavy vehicular movement. Compatible Uses: A wide variety of commercial services oriented to automobiles are appropriate within this category. This includes automobile sales and service, drive in restaurant or other drive in commercial business, convenience stores, etc. Since these uses are also compatible with heavier commercial uses, lumber yards, small scale warehousing, contractor yards and similar heavy commercial uses are appropriate in this designation. Criteria for Designation: This designation should only be applied to areas which are highly accessible to automobiles along major arterials. Generally this category would characterize commercial strips. This zone is appropriate for the intersections of heavily traveled arterials, even if adjacent sites are best suited for another commercial designation. Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Areas which conflict with single family residential areas or areas more suited for other uses. Whenever possible this category should be separated from all uses by extensive buffering. Appropriate Implementation: This category is implemented by the C -3 Heavy Commercial District and the C -4, Mixed Use Commercial District." Page 33 of 36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 141 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 Due to the shape of each property with the narrow frontage bordering W Valley Hwy N and longer axis east -west, the shape of the property is not readily conducive to commercial development over the entire parcel. That was likely the explanation for only the eastern portion begin designated "Heavy Commercial ". The split zoning makes it difficult for a property to owner to develop the property in its entirety with a single use or enterprise. As a result, the requested change is appropriate. Also, in Chapter 3, "Land Use ", the Comprehensive Plan document provides various policies which address light industrial development in order to meet community and growth management goals. The following excerpted policies starting on page 3 -35 relate to this request: "GOAL 11. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT To provide for, establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that respond to local and regional needs and enhance the city's image through optimal siting and location, taking into consideration tax policy impacts of streamlined sales tax and /or other similar legislation. Type of Industrial Uses There is a wide variety of possible industrial uses that could be sited in Auburn. As with the mix of residential uses, the mix of industry also affects the image of the city. The regional image of the city is that of an industrial suburb with an emphasis on heavy industry. This image is quite apparent as one travels along Highway 167 where there is an almost unending view of high -bay warehouse buildings. Different types of industrial areas should be separated since some types of industrial activities conflict with other industrial activities (especially those of a more desirable character). Such separation should be based primarily on performance standards. Location of Industrial Uses Before the adoption of the 1986 Comprehensive Plan, there had been little separation of various types of industrial uses. At the time, there was no well understood policy basis regarding the separation of different types of industrial uses and some areas very suitable for high quality light industrial uses were committed to heavier uses. High visibility corridors developed with a heavier industrial character and established a heavy industry image for the city. The Plan provides clear distinction between different industrial uses. It also reserves areas for light industrial uses. Objective 11.3. To reserve areas appropriate for industrial development. Policies: LU -103 Any significant industrial activity shall be limited to the designated Region Serving Area of the city (see Map 3.2). The City recognizes that industrial development's place varying demands on the community's quality of life and service capabilities. In addition to demonstrating a developments' consistency with Plan policies, applicable land use regulations, and environmental policies, significant Page 34 of 36 ORD.D AUBURN . E THAN YOU IMA lNE age 142 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 industrial development shall be encouraged to provide a balance between service demands and impacts placed on the city's quality of life vs. the local benefits derived from such development. The extent to which industrial development is promoted shall also take into consideration tax policy and tax structure impacts upon the City." (Emphasis added) The city's Comprehensive Plan seeks to establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that respond to local and regional needs while enhancing the city's image through optimal siting and location of light industrial uses. The large lot size and being bordered to the north by properties that are already developed with light industrial uses, suggest the change is appropriate. The proposed change to "Light Industrial" seeks to link existing areas of the same designation. 21. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. The proposed application for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning has been reviewed by Fire Agency and Utilities and Traffic divisions of the city. Based in these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. Fonpee LLC, operating as Omega USA Company is a "building contractor" business and has plans for further development of the southern lot to include a future office building and a future building for storage of vehicles. While this further future development is capable of being done under the C3, Heavy Commercial (office uses and parking structures are allowed) it is complicated by being subject to different development standards. Mr. Stanberry does not have specific plans for redevelopment of his property. If in the future, additional development is proposed, in accordance with City Public Works Design Standards, the City may require a traffic study if there is a likelihood that a site will general more than 30 PM peak hour trips. The proposed change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the City, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. So, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements were recently completed by Omega USA Company for the southern parcel. 22. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, a change to the mapped configuration of the land use designations as requested is logical (a change to Map No. 14.1). The proposed change results in a more logical boundary of the "Light Industrial" designation, and coincides with two public streets. 23. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Page 35 of 36 ORD.D AUBU . E THAN YOU IMA 'NED age 143 of 465 Agenda Subject: CPA13 -0001, CPA13 -0002, & CPA13 -0003 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Plan Map Amendments and Policy /Text Amendments Date: November 26, 2013 There has been a lack of change in conditions that generates the need for the change. The pattern of "Heavy Commercial " - designated parcels has not been revisited since it was originally established at the time of major zoning overhaul in 1987. The original pattern was mainly based on the location of parcel boundaries at the time that have subsequently changed. The proposed change is for a portion of two parcels that have split designations and are located adjacent to other parcels with the "Light Industrial" designation and provides more regular boundaries that reduce potential for land use conflicts. 24. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and "Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region ". The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and "Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region ". The proposal is consistent because it provides land suitable for residential development. 25. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.) The same land use designation as proposed occurs on adjacent properties to the north and the property boundaries have changed and thus meets item b. Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommended approval Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council PCDC Recommendation PCDC concurred with the Planning Commission and recommends approval to the City Council Page 36 of 36 ORD.D AFB E THAN YOU 'NED 1NE age 144 of 465 ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 8 9 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36 70A WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn City Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No 4788, and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 7, 2013, and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received two privately- initiated map amendments (File Nos CPA13 -0001 & CPA13- 0002); and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated one map amendment and six text/policy amendments (File No. CPA13- 0003), and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan map and text/policy amendments were processed by the Planning and Development Department as proposed Year 2013 amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan, and Ordinance No 6489 November 21, 2013 ORM 1 Page 145 of 465 WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP13- 0028); and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60 -day review period in accordance with RCW 36 70A.106, and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 22, 2013, conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Auburn City Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2013 Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, and WHEREAS, on November 12, 2013, the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations, and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2013, the Public Works Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations, and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2013, the Planning and Community Development Committee of the Auburn City Council made a recommendation to the City Council; and Ordinance No 6489 November 21, 2013 Ono 2 Page 146 of 465 WHEREAS, on December 2, 2013, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan city- initiated Map Amendment (CPA13 -0003) is adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "A" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Section 2. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (CPA13- 0003), including the amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Chapters 3, "Land Use "; Chapter 8, "Economic Development "; and Chapter 14, "Comprehensive Plan Map "), are adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "B" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's recommendations, dated October 22, 2013, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 20, 2013, staff report, attached as Exhibit "C ". Section 3. Application CPA13 -0001, Wesley Homes Lea Hill, LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from Ordinance No 6489 November 21, 2013 014114D3 Page 147 of 465 "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" for three properties identified by parcel numbers. 1721059007, 1721059109, and 1721059253 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference Council adopts both the Planning Commission's October 22, 2013 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 20, 2013, staff report, both attached as Exhibit "C" Section 4. Application CPA13 -0002, Fonpee, LLC and Edwin Stanberry Property Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for portions of two properties identified by parcel numbers: 0221049098 and 0221049077 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "E" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's October 22, 2013 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 20, 2013, staff report, both attached as Exhibit Section 5. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No 1703 and adopted by Ordinance No 4788 on September 5, 1995 Section 6. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW 43.21C 060 Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any Ordinance No. 6489 November 21, 2013 0 Rt4 Page 148 of 465 reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ", Exhibit "B ", Exhibit "C ", Exhibit "D" and Exhibit "E" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. INTRODUCED. PASSED. APPROVED: Peter B Lewis MAYOR ATTEST Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Danie =. Heid, City Attorney Published' Ordinance No 6489 November 21, 2013 ORD6 Page 149 of 465 Exhibit A Colored map which is a detail of Map No 14.1, "Comprehensive Plan', showing the change from "High Density Residential" to "Light Commercial" for three parcels identified by Parcel Nos. 2815000020, 2815000010, and 2121059073. (Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6489 November 21, 2013 OR 6 Page 150 of 465 Exhibit B The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans, City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan, Amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan, * Chapters 3, "Land Use" * Chapter 8, "Economic Development" and * Chapter 14, "Comprehensive Plan Map" (See "Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6489 November 21, 2013 ORI@B7 Page 151 of 465 Exhibit C Agenda bill /staff report dated November 20, 2013 Ordinance No. 6489 November 21, 2013 OIRDtB8 Page 152 of 465 Exhibit D Colored map which is a detail of Map No 14.1, "Comprehensive Plan" showing the change from "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" for three properties identified by Parcel Nos. 1721059007, 1721059253, and 1721059109 for Wesley Homes Lea Hill, LLC. (Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6489 November 21, 2013 ORe9 Page 153 of 465 Exhibit E Colored map which is a detail of Map No 14.1, "Comprehensive Plan', showing a change from "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Commercial" for portions of two properties identified by Parcel Nos. 0221049077 and 0221049098 for Fonpee, LLC and Edwin Stanberry. (Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments" tab in the working binder). Ordinance No 6489 November 21, 2013 ORND 10 Page 154 of 465 Year 2013 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) Summary (CPM = Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment; P/T = Policy /Text Amendment) P/T # Title Description Staff Recommendation Planning Corr�miss ati . Recormendation PCDC Recommendation City Council Action Notes P/T #1 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Auburn School District 2013 -2019 Capital Facilities Plan, as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing was conducted on October 22, 2013. Bob Kenworthy, Assistant Director, Capital Projects, Auburn School District, testified in favor of the request. P/T #2 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019 as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing was conducted on October 22, 2013. No public testimony. P/T #3 Federal Way Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Federal Way School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan, as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing was conducted on October 22, 2013. Due to conflict with other City's meetings, Tanya Nascimento, Enrollment and Demographic Analyst, Federal Way School District, submitted a letter dated October 22, 2103 supporting the request. No other public testimony. P/T #4 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate Kent School District 2013/2014 — 2018/2019 Capital Facilities Plan, as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing was conducted on October 22, 2013. No public testimony. P/T #5 City of Auburn's 6 -year Capital Facilities Plan Incorporate the City of Auburn's 6 -year Capital Facilities Plan 2014 -2019, into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing was conducted on October 22, 2013. No public testimony. Subsequent to the Planning Commission's packet preparation and distribution, it was identified that pages 2, 3, 195, 196 and 198 of the CFP needed to change. The reason for change is that pursuant to Auburn City Code Section 19.04.070(A)(9)related to Traffic Impact Fees, the City exempts traffic impact fees for projects located with the `Downtown Catalyst Area'. When traffic impact fees are exempted, the amount is then paid by the jurisdiction. The City anticipates two blocks within the Downtown Catalyst Area to be developed (or permits issued) in 2014. As a result, the source of this city funding needs to be identified in the City Capital Facilities Plan. The PC recommended approval with the amendments. Created: November 6, 2013 ORD.D Page 155 of 465 Page 1 of 3 P/T # Title Description Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Recommendation PCoC Recommends #ion City Council. Action Notes P/T #6 Revise Chapters 3, 8, and 14 of the City's Comprehensive Plan P/T #6 - Comprehensive Plan (various) Revise Chapter 3 — `Land Use' Revise pages 3 -34 through 3 -35 and Page 3 -39 related to emphasis of industrial uses. Revise Chapter 8 — `Economic Development' Revise pages 8 -9 through 8 -11 related to emphasis of industrial uses. Revise Chapter 14 — `Comprehensive Plan Map' Revise page 14 -15 related to emphasis of industrial uses. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing conducted on October 22, 2013. No public testimony. RRCreated: November 6, 2013 ORI�.�vised November 26, 2013 Page 156 of 465 CPA # Title Description Staff Recommendation Planning Commission Recommendation PCDC Recommendation City Council Action Notes CPM # 1 Map No. 14.1 of the Comprehensive Plan File No. CPA13 -0003, Amend Map No. 14.1 fora City- initiated change in the designation of three parcels developed with single family residences totaling 1.76 acres on the north side of Auburn WY S and east of Hemlock ST SE (Parcel Nos. 2815000020, 2815000010 & 2121059073) from "High Density Residential" to "Light Commercial" for future rezoning. The designations are being re- evaluated in light of the surrounding development, evolving land use pattern, and City's planned widening of Auburn WY S. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing conducted on October 22, 2013. Coni Orvis, 3210 Auburn WY S, as property owner testified in favor of the proposal citing increased traffic along Auburn WY S and the desire to have land use and zoning designations the same as adjacent properties. CPM #2 Map No. 14.1, Comprehensive Plan File No. CPA13 -0001, Amend Map No. 14.1 requested by Wesley Homes Lea Hill , LLC to change the designation of existing developed site and two recently acquired adjacent parcels located south of SE 320th ST, between 108th and 110th AVE SE of approx. 18.65 acres (Parcel Nos. 1721059007, 1721059253 &1721059109) The Applicant seeks to change designations of their contiguous parcels from "Single Family Residential" to "Public and Quasi - Public" to facilitate subsequent rezoning to accommodate future expansion of existing elder care facility. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing conducted on October 22, 2013. Paul Cyr, Barghausen Consulting Engineers and agent of the Applicant, testified in favor of the proposed map amendment. He cited the history of approvals. Kevin Anderson, President and CEO of Wesley Homes testified in favor of the proposed map amendment. CPM #3 Map No. 14.1, Comprehensive Plan File No. CPA13 -0002 Amend Map No. 14.1 requested by two adjacent property owners; Fonpee LLC and E. Stanberry of property located at the NW corner of 37th ST NW and W Valley HWY of approx. 2.10 acres (Parcel Nos. 0221049077 & 0221049098). The Applicants seek to change designations of a portion of the parcels from 'Heavy Commercial ' to 'Light Industrial' to facilitate subsequent rezoning and to eliminate split designations of each parcel and to accommodate future potential development. Approval Approval Approval PC Hearing conducted on October 22, 2013. Bonnie Tiangsing a property owner on West Hill said she was in support of the proposal as it might minimize the chance for a King Co. solid waste transfer station to be located in the vicinity. RRCreated: November 6, 2013 ORI�.�vised November 26, 2013 Page 157 of 465 WA S I' I ; r AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 4913 Date: November 26, 2013 Department: Attachments: Budget Impact: Finance Res 4913 $0 Administrative Recommendation: City Council adopt Resolution No. 4913 Background Summary: The City Council would like to identify funding sources to develop and build a community center for the City of Auburn. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember: Partridge Staff: Coleman Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.A RES.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 158 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 4 9 1 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, IDENTIFYING THE CITY COUNCIL'S DESIRE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH FUNDING PREPARATIONS FOR THE CITY OF AUBURN COMMUNITY CENTER WHEREAS, the City Council intends to develop and build a community center for the City of Auburn, and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to pursue the funding of the Community Center with the following goals. • The Mayor or the Finance Department shall periodically report to the City Council, not less often than yearly, of any undesignated financial resources that could be available for the Community Center project. • Funds to be used for the Community Center project shall be segregated from other funds, which segregated funds shall not be used for other purpose except in emergency circumstances as directed by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The City Council would request that the Mayor identify and segregate from available funds amounts that are in excess of current commitments and obligations, those funds that could be utilized long term for support of the development of the community center Section 2. Following the identification of funding sources, the Mayor and Finance Director shall report the status of those funding sources to the City Council so that decisions could be made as to what sources should be segregated and set aside or held for the development of the community center. Resolution No. 4913 February 25, 2013 RES.,age 1 of 2 Page 159 of 465 Section 3 Funds set aside or held for the development of the community center may be reallocated for emergency purposes. Section 4. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 5. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this day of , 2013. ATTEST: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPR• + D AS FORM: Da el B. Heid, Attorney Resolution No. 4913 February 25, 2013 RES.gage 2 of 2 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS MAYOR Page 160 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5001 Department: Public Works Attachments: Resolution 5001 and Attachments Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 15, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5001. Background Summary: Level 3 Communications, LLC, has applied for Public Way Agreement No 13 -34 for fiber optic conduit facilities located in the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) right -of -way which crosses the City's right -of -way. The facilities were authorized under Public Way Agreement No. 99 -04 which has expired. Public Way Agreement No 13 -34 was reviewed by City staff and the applicant and it was determined that the agreement meets the needs of the City and the applicant for the existing facilities in the right of way along the UPRR. At this time the applicant is not proposing to install or construct any new facilities in Auburn. Current facilities do not serve any customers in Auburn and only pass through the City. Resolution No. 5001 approves PWA 13 -34 upon filing with the City Clerk a Statement of Acceptance which is marked "Exhibit C ". Reviewed by Council Committees: Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.B RES.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 161 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 0 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A PUBLIC WAY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC WHEREAS, Level 3 Communications, LLC, has applied to the City for a non - exclusive Public Way Agreement for the right of entry, use, and occupation of certain public rights -of -way within the City of Auburn, expressly to install, construct, erect, operate, maintain, repair, relocate and remove its facilities in, on, upon, along and/or across those right(s)-of-way; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed Level 3 Communications, LLC's application and has determined that the location of Level 3 Communications' facilities within the requested rights -of -way is in the best interest of the City and the citizens of Auburn, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby authorized to execute a Public Way Agreement between the City of Auburn and Level 3 Communications, LLC, which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with Resolution No. 5001 PWA No 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 1 of 2 RES.B Page 162 of 465 the Agreement a copy of which is attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this day of , 2013 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR ATTEST. Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. D: niel B Heid, Cit Resolution No 5001 PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 2 of 2 RES.B Page 163 of 465 CITY OF AUBURN PUBLIC WAY AGREEMENT WITH LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC This Public Way Agreement is entered into by and between the City of Auburn, Washington, a municipal corporation ( "City ") and Level 3 Communications, LLC a Delaware limited liability company ( "Grantee ") WHEREAS, Grantee has applied to the City for a non - exclusive Public Way Agreement for the right of entry, use, and occupation of certain public right(s) -of -way within the City of Auburn, expressly to install, construct, erect, operate, maintain, repair, relocate and remove its facilities in, on, upon, along and/or across those right(s) -of -way; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the Grantee's application and determined that the location of Grantee's facilities within the requested right(s)- of -way is in the best interest of the City and the citizens of Auburn, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits and conditions set forth below, the parties hereto agree as follows. Section 1. Notice A. Written notices to the parties shall be sent by certified mail to the following addresses, unless a different address shall be designated in writing and delivered to the other party City: with a copy to Grantee. Engineering Aide, Public Works Department - Transportation City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 Telephone: (253) 931 -3010; Fax: (253) 931 -3048 City Clerk City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 NIS Contract Management Level 3 Communications, LLC 1025 Eldorado Blvd Broomfield, CO 80021 Telephone: (720) 888 -1000 CMA.[c�leve13.com Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 1 of 14 RES.B Page 164 of 465 with a copy to General Counsel Level 3 Communications, LLC 1025 Eldorado Blvd Broomfield, CO 80021 Telephone. (720) 888 -1000 B Any changes to the above- stated Grantee information shall be sent to the City's Engineering Aide, with copies to the City Clerk, referencing the title and date of this agreement. C The Grantee's voice and fax telephone numbers shall be staffed at a minimum of between 8 AM and 4 PM Pacific Time. Section 2. Grant of Right to Use Public Way A. Subject to the terms and conditions stated herein, the City grants to the Grantee general permission to enter, use, and occupy the right(s) -of -way specified in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto (the "Public Way ") B The Grantee is authorized to install, remove, construct, erect, operate, maintain, relocate and repair the facilities specified in Exhibit "B ", attached hereto, and all necessary appurtenances thereto, ( "Grantee Facilities ") for provision of lawful communications, including, without limitation, long distance voice and data communications and other lawful communications as disclosed to the City from time to time ( "Grantee Services ") in, along, under and across the Public Way, for the sole purpose of providing commercial utility or telecommunications services to persons or areas outside the City. C This Public Way Agreement does not authorize the use of the Public Way for any facilities or services other than Grantee Facilities and Grantee Services, and it extends no rights or privilege relative to any facilities or services of any type, including Grantee Facilities and Grantee Services, elsewhere within the City D This Public Way Agreement is non - exclusive and does not prohibit the City from entering into other agreements, including Public Way Agreements, impacting the Public Way, unless the City determines that entering into such agreements interferes with Grantee's rights under this Agreement. E. Except as explicitly set forth herein, this Public Way Agreement does not waive any rights that the City has or may hereafter acquire with respect to the Public Way or any other City roads, rights -of -way, property, or any portions Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 2 of 14 RES.B Page 165 of 465 thereof This Public Way Agreement shall be subject to the power of eminent domain, and in any proceeding under eminent domain, the Grantee acknowledges its use of the Public Way shall have no value F The City reserves the right to change, regrade, relocate, abandon, or vacate the Public Way lf, at any time during the term of this Public Way Agreement, the City vacates any portion of the Public Way, the City shall reserve an easement for public utilities within that vacated portion, pursuant to RCW 35 79.030, within which the Grantee may continue to operate the Grantee Facilities under the terms of this Public Way Agreement for the remaining period set forth under Section 3 G. The Grantee agrees that its use of Public Way shall at all times be subordinated to and subject to the City and the public's need for municipal infrastructure, travel, and access to the Public Way, except as may be otherwise required by law. H. Should the Grantee seek to use the Public Way to provide services, including Grantee Services, to City residents or businesses, the Grantee shall apply for, obtain, and comply with the terms of a City franchise agreement for such use. Entry into a City franchise agreement shall automatically terminate this Agreement. Section 3. Term of Agreement A. This Public Way Agreement shall run for a period of five (5) years, from the date of execution specified in Section 5 B Renewal Option of Term The Grantee may renew this Public Way Agreement for an additional five (5) year period upon submission and approval of the application specified under ACC 20 04.120, as it now exists or is amended, within the tinieframe set forth therein (currently 180 to 120 days prior to expiration of the then - current term) Any materials submitted by the Grantee for a previous application may be considered by the City in reviewing a current application, and the Grantee shall only submit those materials deemed necessary by the City to address changes in the Grantee Facilities or Grantee Services, or to reflect specific reporting periods mandated by the ACC Section 4. Definitions For the purpose of this agreement: "ACC" means the Auburn City Code Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 3 of 14 RES.B Page 166 of 465 "Emergency" means a condition of imminent danger to the health, safety and welfare of Persons or property located within the City including, without limitation,' damage to Persons or property from natural consequences, such as storms, earthquakes, riots, acts of terrorism or wars. "Maintenance or Maintain" shall mean examining, testing, inspecting, repairing, maintaining and replacing the existing Grantee Facilities or any part thereof as required and necessary for safe operation. "Relocation" means permanent movement of Grantee facilities required by the City, and not temporary or incidental movement of such facilities, or other revisions Grantee would accomplish and charge to third parties without regard to municipal request. "Rights -of -Way" means the surface and the space above and below streets, roadways, highways, avenues, courts, lanes, alleys, sidewalks, easements, rights -of -ways and similar public properties and areas. Section 5. Acceptance of Public Way Agreement A. This Public Way Agreement, and any rights granted hereunder, shall not become effective for any purpose unless and until Grantee files with the City Clerk (1) the Statement of Acceptance, attached hereto as Exhibit "C ", (2) all verifications of insurance coverage specified under Section 15, and (3) the financial guarantees specified in Section 16 (collectively, "Public Way Acceptance ") The date that such Public Way Acceptance is filed with the City Clerk shall be the effective date of this Public Way Agreement. B Should the Grantee fail to file the Public Way Acceptance with the City Clerk within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the resolution approving the Public Way Agreement, said agreement will automatically terminate and shall be null and void. Section 6. Construction and Maintenance A. The Grantee shall apply for, obtain, and comply with the terms of all permits required under ACC Chapter 12.24 for any work done upon Grantee Facilities. Grantee shall comply with all applicable City, State, and Federal codes, rules, regulations, and orders in undertaking such work, which shall be done in a thorough and proficient manner. B Grantee agrees to coordinate its activities with the City and all other utilities located within the Public Way. Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 4 of 14 RES.B Page 167 of 465 C The City expressly reserves the right to prescribe how and where Grantee Facilities shall be installed within the Public Way and may from time to time, pursuant to the applicable sections of this Public Way Agreement, require the removal, relocation and /or replacement thereof in the public interest and safety at the expense of the Grantee. D. Before commencing any work within the Public Way, the Grantee shall comply with the One Number Locator provisions of RCW Chapter 19 122 to identify existing utility infrastructure. Section 7. Repair and Emergency Work In the event of an emergency, the Grantee may commence such repair and emergency response work as required under the circumstances, provided that the Grantee shall notify the City's City's Engineering Aide in writing as promptly as possible, before such repair or emergency work commences, or as soon thereafter as possible, if advance notice is not practicable The City may act, at any time, without prior written notice in the case of emergency, but shall notify the Grantee in writing as promptly as possible under the circumstances. Section 8. Damages to City and Third -Party Property Grantee agrees that should any of its actions under this Public Way Agreement impair or damage any City property, survey monument, or property owned by a third - party, Grantee will restore, at its own cost and expense, said property to its original condition. Such repair work shall be performed and completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer Section 9. Location Preference A. Any structure, equipment, appurtenance or tangible property of a privately -owned utility, other than the Grantee's, which was installed, constructed, completed or in place prior in time to Grantee's application for a permit to construct or repair Grantee Facilities under this Public Way Agreement shall have preference as to positioning and location with respect to the Grantee Facilities. However, to the extent that the Grantee Facilities are completed and installed prior to new or additional structures, equipment, appurtenances or tangible property of an earlier privately -owned utility being installed or completed, then the Grantee Facilities shall have priority. These rules governing preference shall continue in the event of the necessity of relocating or changing the grade of any such City road or right -of -way. A relocating utility shall not necessitate the relocation of another utility that otherwise would not require relocation. This Section shall not apply to any City facilities or utilities that may in the future require the relocation of Grantee Facilities. Such relocations shall be governed by Section 11 Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 5 of 14 RES.B Page 168 of 465 B. Grantee shall maintain a minimum underground horizontal separation of five (5) feet from City water facilities and ten (10) feet from above- ground City water facilities; provided, that for development of new areas, the City, together with Grantee and other utility purveyors or authorized users of the Pubic Way, will develop and follow the City Engineer's determination of a consensus for guidelines and procedures for determining specific utility locations, subject additionally to this agreement and to a Franchise agreement, should one become necessary Section 10. Grantee Information A. Grantee agrees to supply, at no cost to the City, such information as the Director of Public Works, or his or her designee, find necessary to coordinate municipal functions with Grantee's activities and to fulfill any municipal obligations under state law Said information shall include, at a minimum: as -built drawings of Grantee Facilities, installation inventory; and maps and plans showing the location of existing or planned facilities within the City Said information shall be provided either in hard copy and/or electronic format as requested by the City, compatible with the City's then - current database system, including the City's geographic information Service (GIS) data base Grantee shall keep the City's Engineering Aide informed of its Tong -range plans for coordination with the City's long -range plans. B The parties understand that Washington law limits the ability of the City to shield from public disclosure any information given to the City. Grantee shall clearly mark any information that it provides to the City as "Proprietary" information if Grantee believes that disclosure of that information would be exempt under the trade secrets exemption in RCW 42.56.270. The City agrees that if it receives a request for Grantee's proprietary information, it will initially assert the exemption under 42.56.270, and will notify Grantee of the request. The City shall not initiate legal action to prevent disclosure of Grantee's proprietary information. If a requestor files a lawsuit to compel disclosure, Grantee agrees to defend the action at Grantee's sole expense. Additionally, Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the City for any loss or liability for costs for attorneys fees because of non - disclosures requested by Grantee under Washington's open public records law, provided reasonable notice and opportunity to defend was given to Grantee or Grantee is made aware of the pending of a request or claim. Section 11. Relocation, of Grantee Facilities A. Except as otherwise so required by law, Grantee agrees to relocate, remove, or reroute its facilities at its sole expense and liability and at no Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No, 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 6 of 14 RES.B Page 169 of 465 expense or liability to the City, except as may be required by RCW Chapter 35 99, or as further provided by Title 20 ACC, as ordered by the City Engineer, and upon sixty (60) days written notice from the City Pursuant to the provisions of Section 14, Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any customer or third -party claims for service interruption or other losses in connection with any such change, relocation, abandonment, or vacation of the Public Way B In the event that the Public Way shall become a Primary State Highway as provided by law, the State Department of Transportation may order the Grantee to perform or undertake, at its sole expense, changes to the location of Grantee Facilities so that the same shall not interfere with such state highway and so that such facilities shall conform to such new grades or routes as may be established C. If a readjustment or relocation of the Grantee Facilities is necessitated by a request from a party other than the City, that party shall pay the Grantee the actual costs thereof Section 12. Abandonment and or Removal of Grantee Facilities A. Within one hundred and eighty (180) days of Grantee's permanent cessation of use of the Grantee Facilities, or any portion thereof, the Grantee shall, at the City's discretion, either abandon in place or remove the affected facilities. B The parties agree that those conduits specified in Exhibit E, attached hereto, have been abandoned by the Grantee and are the property of the City The City has all responsibility for the operation and maintenance of those conduits. In consideration of the Grantee releasing all claims it may have to the ownership of the conduits, the City grants the Grantee the right to use one conduit within each of the multi- conduit bundle shown in Exhibit E for the period of this Public Way Agreement, including any renewals thereof under Section 3. C The parties expressly agree that this Section shall survive the expiration, revocation or termination of this Public Way Agreement. Section 13. Undergrounding A. The parties agree that this Public Way Agreement does not limit the City's authority under federal law, state law, or the ACC, to require the undergrounding of utilities. B Whenever the City requires the undergrounding of aerial utilities in the Public Way, the Grantee shall underground the Grantee Facilities in the Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 7 of 14 RES.B Page 170 of 465 manner specified by the City Engineer, and where other utilities are present and involved in the undergrounding project, Grantee shall only be required to pay its fair share of common costs borne by all utilities, in addition to the costs specifically attributable to the undergrounding of Grantee Facilities. Common costs shall include necessary costs for common trenching and utility vaults. Fair share shall be determined in comparison to the total number and size of all other utility facilities being undergrounded Section 14. Indemnification and Hold Harmless A. The Grantee shall defend, indemnify, and hold the City and its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers harmless from any and all costs, claims, injuries, damages, losses, suits, or liabilities of any nature including attorneys' fees arising out of or in connection with the Grantee's performance under this Public Way Agreement, except to the extent such costs, claims, injuries, damages, losses, suits, or liabilities are caused by the negligence of the City The Grantee shall hold the City harmless from any liability arising out of or in connection with any damage or loss to the Grantee Facilities caused by maintenance and/or construction work performed by, or on behalf of, the City within the Public Way or any other City road, right -of -way, or other property, except to the extent any such damage or loss is directly caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of the City, or any of its employees, contractors, agents, or representatives. C The Grantee acknowledges that neither the City nor any other public agency with responsibility for fire fighting, emergency rescue, public safety or similar duties within the City has the capability to provide trench, close trench or confined space rescue. The Grantee, and its agents, assigns, successors, or contractors, shall make such arrangements as Grantee deems fit for the provision of such services. The Grantee shall hold the City harmless from any liability arising out of or in connection with any damage or loss to the Grantee for the City's failure or inability to provide such services, and, pursuant to the terms of Section 14(A), the Grantee shall indemnify the City against any and all third - party costs, claims, injuries, damages, losses, suits, or liabilities based on the City's failure or inability to provide such services. D Should a court of competent jurisdiction determine that this Agreement is subject to RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from the concurrent negligence of the Grantee and the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, the Grantee's liability hereunder shall be only to the extent of the Grantee's negligence. It is further specifically and Resolution No 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 8 of 14 RES.B Page 171 of 465 expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the City's and Grantee's waivers of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of the indemnifications set forth in this Section 14. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. E. Acceptance by the City of any work performed by the Grantee shall not be grounds for avoidance of this section. Section 15. Insurance A. The Grantee shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Grantee, its agents, representatives, or employees in the amounts and types set forth below: 1 Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non - owned, hired, and leased vehicles with a minimum combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage of $1,000,000 00 per accident. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 00 each occurrence, $2,000,000 00 general aggregate and a $2,000,000 00 products - completed operations aggregate limit. Coverage shall be written on ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors, products - completed operations, and personal injury and advertising injury and liability assumed under an insured contract. Aggregate limit of $2,000,000.00 can be satisfied by Excess Liability at $1,000,000 00 There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an additional insured under the Grantee's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed under this Public Way Agreement using ISO Additional Insured Endorsement CG 20 10 10 01 and Additional Insured - Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage. 3 Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of the State of Washington. Employer's Liability $1,000,000 00 per occurrence (Stop Gap Liability included in Employer's Liability ) Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 9 of 14 RES.B Page 172 of 465 B. The insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions for Automobile Liability and Commercial General Liability insurance. 1. The Grantee's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City Any insurance, self - insurance, or insurance pool coverage maintained by the City shall be in excess of the Grantee's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. The Grantee's insurance shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be cancelled by either party except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. C Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of not less than A.VII D. Verification of Coverage. Grantee shall furnish the City with documentation of insurer's A.M. Best rating and with original certificates and a copy of amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant before commencement of the work. E. Grantee shall have the right to self- insure any or all of the above - required insurance Any such self insurance is subject to approval by the City F Grantee's maintenance of insurance as required by this Agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy to which the City is otherwise entitled at law or in equity Section 16. Performance Security Pursuant to ACC Chapter 20 10, the Grantee shall provide the City with adequate security as specified in ACC Section 20.10.250, in a form and substance acceptable to the City, securing the Grantee's faithful compliance with the terms of this Public Way Agreement. Such guarantees shall be in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000 00) Section 17. Successors and Assignees A. All the provisions, conditions, regulations and requirements herein contained shall be binding upon the successors, assigns of, and independent contractors of the Grantee, and all rights and privileges, as well as all obligations Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 10 of 14 RES.B Page 173 of 465 and liabilities of the Grantee shall inure to its successors, assignees and contractors equally as if they were specifically mentioned herein wherever the Grantee is mentioned. B This public way agreement shall not be leased, assigned or otherwise alienated without the express consent of the City by resolution, provided however, that Grantee may assign this public way agreement to an entity controlled by, controlling, or under common control with Grantee, or to an entity succeeding to substantially all of Grantee's assets (each a "Permitted Transferee ") upon written notice to the City, but without the need for such consent. C Except for assignments to a Permitted Transferee, Grantee and any proposed assignee or transferee shall provide and certify the following to the City not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the proposed date of transfer (a) Complete information setting forth the nature, term and conditions of the proposed assignment or transfer; (b) All information required by the City of an applicant for a Public Way Agreement with respect to the proposed assignee or transferee, and, (c) An application fee which shall be set by the City, plus any other costs actually and reasonably incurred by the City in processing, and investigating the proposed assignment or transfer Section 18. Dispute Resolution A. In the event of a dispute between the City and the Grantee arising by reason of this Agreement, the dispute shall first be referred to the operational officers or representatives designated by Grantor and Grantee to have oversight over the administration of this Agreement. The officers or representatives shall meet within fifteen (15) calendar days of either party's request for a meeting, whichever request is first, and the parties shall make a good faith effort to achieve a resolution of the dispute. B. If the parties fail to achieve a resolution of the dispute in this manner, either party may then pursue any available judicial remedies. This Public Way Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington. In the event any suit, arbitration, or other proceeding is instituted to enforce any term of this Agreement, the parties specifically understand and agree that venue shall be exclusively in King County, Washington. The prevailing party in any such action shall be entitled to its attorneys' fees and costs of suit, which shall be fixed by the judge hearing the case, and such fees shall be included in the judgment. Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. '13-34 October 7, 2013 Page 11 of 14 RES.B Page 174 of 465 Section 19. Enforcement and Remedies A. If the Grantee shall willfully violate, or fail to comply with any of the provisions of this Public Way Agreement through willful intent or gross negligence, or should it fail to heed or comply with any notice given to Grantee under the provisions of this agreement, the City may, at its discretion, provide Grantee with written notice to cure the breach within thirty (30) days of notification. If the City determines the breach cannot be cured within thirty days, the City may specify a longer cure period, and condition the extension of time on Grantee's submittal of a plan to cure the breach within the specified period, commencement of work within the original thirty day cure period, and diligent prosecution of the work to completion If the breach is not cured within the specified time, or the Grantee does not comply with the specified conditions, the Grantee, and its successors or assignees, shall forfeit all rights conferred hereunder, and the Public Way Agreement may be revoked or annulled by the City with no further notification B Should the City determine that Grantee is acting beyond the scope of permission granted herein for Grantee Facilities and Grantee Services, the City reserves the right to cancel this Public Way Agreement upon thirty days (30) written notice to Grantee and require the Grantee to apply for, obtain, and comply with all applicable City permits, franchises, or other City permissions for such actions, and if the Grantee's actions are not allowed under the Auburn City Code, to compel Grantee to cease such actions. Section 20. Compliance with Laws and Regulations A. This Public Way Agreement is subject to, and the Grantee shall comply with all applicable federal and state or City laws, regulations and policies (including all applicable elements of the City's comprehensive plan), in conformance with federal laws and regulations, affecting performance under this Public Way Agreement. Furthermore, notwithstanding any other terms of this agreement appearing to the contrary, the Grantee shall be subject to the police power of the City to adopt and enforce general ordinances necessary to protect the safety and welfare of the general public in relation to the rights granted in the Public Way. B The City reserves the right at any time to amend this Public Way Agreement to conform to any hereafter enacted, amended, or adopted federal or state statute or regulation relating to the public health, safety, and welfare, or relating to roadway regulation, or a City Ordinance enacted pursuant to such federal or state statute or regulation upon providing Grantee with thirty (30) days written notice of its action setting forth the full text of the amendment and identifying the statute, regulation, or ordinance requiring the amendment. Said Resolution No, 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 12 of 14 RES.B Page 175 of 465 amendment shall become automatically effective upon expiration of the notice period unless, before expiration of that period, the Grantee makes a written call for negotiations over the terms of the amendment. If the parties do not reach agreement as to the terms of the amendment within thirty (30) days of the initial notice, the City may enact the proposed amendment, by incorporating the Grantee's concerns to the maximum extent the City deems possible C. The City may terminate this Public Way Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the Grantee, if the Grantee fails to comply with such amendment or modification Section 21. License, Tax and Other Charges This Public Way Agreement shall not exempt the Grantee from any future license, tax, or charge which the City may hereinafter adopt pursuant to authority granted to it under state or federal law for revenue or as reimbursement for use and occupancy of public ways Section 22. Consequential Damages Limitation Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, in no event shall either party be liable for any special, incidental, indirect, punitive, reliance, consequential or similar damages. Section 23. Severability If any portion of this Public Way Agreement is deemed invalid, the remainder portions shall remain in effect. Section 24. Titles The section titles used herein are for reference only and should not be used for the purpose of interpreting this Public Way Agreement. DATED and SIGNED this day of , 20� CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS MAYOR Resolution No. 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 13 of 14 RES.B Page 176 of 465 ATTEST Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM. Daniel B Heid, City Attorney Resolution No, 5001 Exhibit "A" PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 14 of 14 RES.B Page 177 of 465 Level 3 Exhibit A clam Level 3 Facilities RES.B Hydrology ---- Streams Lakes and Rivers Political Boundaries Transportation Ifjul City of Auburn N Arterials fSurrounding Cities e / Highways FT King and Pierce Counties Locals Pnntecl 0, 10/13/1013 Map ID 4310 Irthirn non shown .1 In gereral, alerer„_e piny05e> Only and Coe> nat nex■ssariy represent exact .iengrahhir of sailagr1phr. d.Ca a, mapped Pie ofAr,t. rnmage' 178 of 465 Exhibit "B" Grantee Facilities Fiber optic cable consisting of individual fiber optic strands. Grantee Services Level 3 Communications, LLC is a global provider of bandwidth infrastructure solutions, offering traditional lit and dark telecommunications services (including private lines and wavelengths, Internet access and co- location) to wholesale and enterprise customers over a fiber -optic network. Wholesale carrier customers include telecom, wireless, cable, LEC and Internet service providers. Enterprise customers include web - centric and technology businesses, government entities, educational institutions, financial services companies, healthcare providers and smaller firms needing to connect multiple facilities. Resolution No. 5001 PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 1 of 1 RES.B Page 179 of 465 EXHIBIT "C" STATEMENT OF ACCEPTANCE Level 3 Communications, LLC, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by all lawful terms, conditions and provisions of the Public Way Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference Level 3 Communications, LLC By: Date. Name. Title. STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD) On this day of , 20 , before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of Colorado, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared, of Level 3 Communications, the company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal on the date hereinabove set forth. Signature NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Colorado, residing at MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. Resolution No 5001 PWA No. 13 -34 October 7, 2013 Page 1 of 1 RES.B Page 180 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5004 Department: Public Works Attachments: Res 5004 Exhibits Staff Report Vicinity Map Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 15, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5004. Background Summary: Plan A Development LLC has applied to the City for vacation of the right -of -way of the alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south of East Main Street, shown on Exhibit "A ". The applicant currently owns all but one of the surrounding parcels and is proposing to incorporate the right -of -way in the development of the adjacent properties for a more cohesive plan and better access for tenants and service vehicles. The application has been reviewed by City staff and utility purveyors who have an interest in this right -of -way. Through this review City staff has determined that the right of way is no longer necessary to meet the needs of the City and that a public hearing should be set to determine if said right -of -way may be vacated. Resolution No. 5004, if adopted by City Council, sets the date of the public hearing for Vacation No. V1 -13 for January 6, 2014. Reviewed by Council Committees: Planning And Community Development, Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.0 RES.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 181 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 0 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE VACATION OF THE ALLEY BETWEEN SOUTH DIVISION STREET AND A STREET SE, SOUTH OF EAST MAIN STREET, WITHIN THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON WHEREAS, the City of Auburn, Washington, has received a petition signed by owners of at least two- thirds (2/3) of the property abutting right -of -way at the location of the Alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south of East Main Street and adjacent to Parcel Nos. 7815700075, 7815700070, 7815700047, 7815700005, 7815700015, 7815700020 and 7815700030, within the City of Auburn, Washington, requesting that the same be vacated; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 35.79.010 of the Revised Code of Washington, a hearing on such vacation shall be set by Resolution, with the date of such hearing being not more than sixty (60) days nor less than twenty (20) days after the date of passage of such Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1 That a hearing on the vacation of the Alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south of East Main Street, located within the City of Auburn, Washington, legally described as follows. Resolution No. 5004 ROW Vacation V1 -13 November 13, 2013 Page 1 RES.0 Page 182 of 465 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BEING THE EAST -WEST ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 1, TOWN OF SLAUGHTER, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, AT PAGE 56, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, IN SAID TOWN OF SLAUGHTER; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, OF SAID BLOCK, NORTH 89 °05'41" WEST, 240.60 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4, THENCE SOUTH 00 °56'35" WEST, 20 00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, OF SAID BLOCK, THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 5 THROUGH 8 OF SAID BLOCK, SOUTH 89 °05'41" EAST, 240 68 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH 00 °42'53" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING and as shown on the document attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, is hereby set for 7.30 p.m. on the 6th day of January, 2014, at the City Council Chambers at 25 West Main Street, Auburn, Washington, 98001, with all persons wishing to speak to the vacation at the public hearing being invited to attend. Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation, including posting notice of such public hearing as required by State law and City Ordinance Section 3. This Resolution shall be in full force in effect upon passage and signatures hereon. Resolution No 5004 ROW Vacation V1 -13 November 13, 2013 Page 2 RES.0 Page 183 of 465 DATED and SIGNED this day of , 2013. CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS Mayor Attest: Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk Resolution No 5004 ROW Vacation V1 -13 November 13, 2013 Page 3 RES.0 Page 184 of 465 EXHIBIT "A" ]E1�47C MAIN STREET N 89'04'02" W SHEET 1 OF 2 SEE DETAIL PAGE 2 30' 30' 0 300.00' MEAS. (300.00' PLAT) 240.12' CALC. (240.00' 0 N) 120.05' CALC. (120' PLAT) 2 P.O.B. S.E. LOT CORNER 1, U aQ V° °' BLOCK 1, 240.60' -. AL ALLEY ,! ff N /.�.® (12o' PLAT) 119.93' CALC. ■` 240.68' a 120.05' CALI (12o' PLAT) LL N 241.16 CALC. (240.00' PLAT) O C.uE &E. M S 89'07'20" E 301.28' MEAS. (300.00' PLAT) RES.0 GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 1 inch = 50 ft. { r 30' N 00'42'53" E 30' PRIZM SURVEYING INC. P. 0. BOX 110700 TACOMA WA. 98411 ESTABLISHED OFFICE 253- 404 -0983 IBBa FAX 253- 404 -0984 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT - BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS REV 10/8/13, BY SDO JOB NO. 2012 -062 Page 185 of 465 EXHIBIT "B" SHEET 2 OF 2 THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON BEING THE EAST -WEST ALLEY LOCATED IN BLOCK 1, TOWN OF SLAUGHTER, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 2 OF PLATS, AT PAGE 56, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, IN SAID TOWN OF SLAUGHTER; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 4, OF SAID BLOCK, NORTH 89'05'41" WEST, 240.60 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 4; THENCE SOUTH 00'56'35" WEST, 20.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 5, OF SAID BLOCK; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS 5 THROUGH 8 OF SAID BLOCK, SOUTH 89'05'41" EAST, 240.68 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 8; THENCE NORTH 00'42'53" EAST, 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. DETAIL NOT TO SCALE CASED PLAT MONUMENT 1(i <ai• BAST MAIN 11192811 CASED MONUMENT NOT A PART OF THIS SURVEY !/ETA..1 l e PRIZM SUR \EYINe INC. P. 0. BOX 110700 TACOMA WA. 98411 ESTABLISHED OFFICE 253- 404 -0983 1993 FAX 253- 404 -0984 CONSTRUCTION LAYOUT - BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEYS JOB NO. 2012 -062 RES.0 Page 186 of 465 CITY OF RIGHT -OF -WAY VACATION STAFF REPORT Right -of -Way (ROW) Vacation Number V1 -13 Applicant: Plan A Development LLC Property Location: Right -of -Way located at the Alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south of East Main Street. Description of right -of -way: This ROW proposed for vacation consists the Alley between South Division Street and A Street SE, south to East Main Street. The Alley is adjacent to Parcels 7815700030, 7815700020, 7815700015 and 7815700005 on the north side and Parcels 7815700047, 7815700070 and 7815700075 on the south side. All of these parcels, except for 7815700075 are owned by the applicant. The proposed area of ROW for vacation is 4,813( + / -) square feet. The Alley was dedicated for street purposes in 1886 to the City of Auburn from Mary E. and L.W. Ballard through dedication of the original plat of the City also know as the Town of Slaughter. See Exhibits "A" and "B" for legal description and survey. Proposal: The Applicant proposes that the City vacate the above described right -of -way so that they can create a more cohesive development on adjoining properties. Applicable Policies & Regulations: • RCW's applicable to this situation - meets requirements of RCW 35.79. • MUTCD standards - not affected by this proposal. • City Code or Ordinances - meets requirements of ACC 12.48. • Comprehensive Plan Policy - not affected. • City Zoning Code - not affected. Public Benefit: • This street vacation decreases the Right -of -Way maintenance obligation of the City. • The vacated area may be subject to property taxes. Discussion: The vacation application was circulated to Puget Sound Energy (PSE), Comcast, CenturyLink, and City staff. 1. PSE — PSE has existing electric and gas facilities and will require an easement. 2. Comcast — Comcast has existing facilities in the right -of -way that services multiple customers and will require an easement to continue to service those customers. 3. CenturyLink — CenturyLink has existing facilities in the proposed vacation area and will require and easement. 4. Water — Currently, there is an existing 2" water line within the right -of -way to be vacated. Additionally, the applicant is proposing to install additional water facilities within the right of way to be vacated. As a condition of approval, a public water utility easement within the proposed vacation area shall be granted to the City. 1 of 3 11/15/2013 Cgvert.7967.1.V1- 13_Staff Report_093013 Page 187 of 465 5. Sewer — Currently, there is an existing sanitary sewer main along the alley between South Division and A Street SE within the right -of -way to be vacated. As a condition of approval, a public sewer utility easement within the proposed vacation area shall be granted to the City. 6. Storm —There are no existing storm facilities in the proposed vacation area. An easement is not needed. 7. Transportation — No comments. 8. Building — No comments. 9. Planning — No comments 10. Fire — No comments 11. Police — No comments 12. Streets — No comments 13. Construction — No comments 14. Innovation and Technology — No comments 15. General Review — A public access easement for the purposes of vehicular access, pedestrian access, emergency access, individual parcel access and private property access shall be reserved along the entire length and width of the vacated right -of -way. Any future development or building over the vacated ROW may require that the developer /owner vacate necessary easements and relocate all affected utilities prior to construction. Assessed Value: ACC 12.48 states "The city council may require as a condition of the ordinance that the city be compensated for the vacated right -of -way in an amount which does not exceed one -half the value of the right -of -way so vacated, except in the event the subject property or portions thereof were acquired at public expense or have been part of a dedicated public right -of -way for 25 years or more, compensation may be required in an amount equal to the full value of the right -of -way being vacated. The city engineer shall estimate the value of the right -of -way to be vacated based on the assessed values of comparable properties in the vicinity. If the value of the right -of -way is determined by the city engineer to be greater than $2,000, the applicant will be required to provide the city with an appraisal by an MAI appraiser approved by the city engineer, at the expense of the applicant. The city reserves the right to have a second appraisal performed at the city's expense." Note: The city engineer has not required an appraisal for the value of this right -of -way since the right -of -way was originally acquired through dedication of a Plat or through a Quit Claim Deed at no cost to the City. RCW 35.79.030 states the vacation "shall not become effective until the owners of property abutting upon the street or alley, or part thereof so vacated, shall compensate such city or town in an amount which does not exceed one -half the appraised value of the area so vacated. If the street or alley has been part of a dedicated public right -of -way for twenty -five years or more, or if the subject property or portions thereof were acquired at public expense, the city or town may require the owners of the property abutting the street or alley to compensate the city or town in an amount that does not exceed the full appraised value of the area vacated." The right -of -way was acquired through dedication of a Plat on February 28, 1886 at no cost to the City. Recommendation: Staff recommends that the street vacation be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. A public utility easement shall be reserved for City of Auburn sanitary sewer facilities along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 2. A public utility easement shall be reserved for City of Auburn water facilities along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 3. An easement shall be reserved for Puget Sound Energy electric and gas facilities along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 4. An easement shall be reserved for Comcast Cable Corporation cable facilities along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 5. An easement shall be reserved for CenturyLink communications facilities along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 2 of 3 11/15/2013 Cgvert.7967.1.V1- 13_Staff Report_093013 Page 188 of 465 6. A public access easement for the purposes of allowing vehicular, pedestrian, and emergency access, to individual parcels located adjacent to the vacated right -of -way shall be reserved along the entire length and width of the vacated ROW. 7. Staff recommends that compensation for the value of the right -of -way not be required since the right -of- way was originally acquired through dedication of a Plat at no cost to the City. 3 of 3 11/15/2013 Cgvert.7967.1.V1- 13_Staff Report_093013 Page 189 of 465 ROW Vacation No. V1 -13 for Plan A Development LLC II CIt'u iia F' A,Llbum Proressiicnall IPIa :a Al r1-57 Ali JILLW , EI•,TE= FFISES LLI E` = E =sl _ E_ SINESS E...1-4.K O F -= .GITCOL! - E6,T =,.t - E TRUM =' w CENTRL'1�1 iii " ` r� t- w w , Er ror ',0 z - o= r L'(SR,E, ' F- R.TrolE'.T -.. Ir - "T i.. .AShnIP+V,e`.T. -:1, 'C -A I'.�b,CI�,L SEF IC EE = L.rIJCIA.L SERVICES H z 5 Ci w w FINANCIAL SERVICES : = © w w J " J 0 - m w LLC 1- Me proposed for vacation - CE,NTRUro9 CE NTR,L -I. 1 FINANCIAL ' FIN .C:I ALI1 . -.E' 'rh : -:h I SERVICES SEF 'ICES -, " =T LL .. „- h IC', T - T -1. 1>_ - �,Q Avow �.�..��.�,,, ..,, -,Li C0h,i4F'R,EPN ENS .lVE, T -'dI PR.iOPE:R.TY TA:X OA, -- - C - _ �A, _ _ `. -.� R. . .. . ROBERTS I,_T= GROLIPLL_ '._ T'._ ..L E -.i, I ". Printed Date:10/28/2013 N Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily \ E represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. S RES.0 Page 190 465 of AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5006 Department: Information Services Attachments: Res 5006 and Agreement IDC Consulting Project Quote IDC Consulting Project Scope Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $69,237.50 Innovation & Technology recommends approval of this project to provide wireless connectivity beneficial to city staff, police, and citizens. Background Summary: The City of Auburn received a COPS grant in 2011 -12 for approximately $150,000 which was used to purchase 6 Motorola wireless access points to improve law enforcement communications. The intent of the purchase was to improve police services and connectivity within the city and provide additional throughput for services such as voice and video. Due to the City of Auburn infrastructure, and extensive ITS and Fiber infrastructure this project can be completed utilizing signal poles and City owned fiber. The completed project will allow expanded priority services to police allowing their technology to seamlessly bounce between cellular and wireless at speeds up to 10MB allowing added services like video, voice, and application enhancements. Reviewed by Council Committees: Municipal Services Other: Information & Technology Councilmember: Peloza Staff: Tiedeman Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.D RES.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 191 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 0 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND ID CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC FOR WIRELESS ACCESS POINT SERVICES WHEREAS, The City wishes to have wireless access points installed and configured in various locations; and WHEREAS, after reviewing available service providers, City staff recommends that the City enter into a contract with ID Consulting Services, LLC, 5531 N Glenwood Street, Boise, ID 83714 for these services, and WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the parties to enter into an agreement for installation and configuration of wireless access points. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute an Agreement between the City and 1D Consulting Services, LLC for installation, configuration, and design of Motorola wireless access points and equipment which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Resolution No 5006 November 4, 2013 REsit1 of 2 Page 192 of 465 Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this day of , 2013 ATTEST. Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APP' o ' Ei:. ,.O FORM. Daniel B Heid, City = ttorney Resolution No. 5006 November 4, 2013 giggly of 2 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B. LEWIS, MAYOR Page 193 of 465 CITY OF AUBURN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR FIBER AND WIRELESS INFRASTRUCTURE INSTALLATION THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this day of 200, by and between the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City" ID CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC, 5531 N Glenwood Street, Boise, ID 83714, hereinafter referred to as the "Provider." RECITALS • 1. The City is in need of the professional services of individuals, employees or firms for installation, configuration, and design of Motorola wireless access points and equipment; and, 2. The City desires to retain the Provider to provide certain services in connection with the City's work on said project; and, 3. The Provider is qualified and able to provide consulting services in connection with the City's needs for the above - described work/project, and is willing and agreeable to provide such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Scope of Services. The Provider agrees to perform in a good and professional manner the tasks described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (The tasks described on Exhibit "A" shall be individually referred to as a "task," and collectively referred to as the "services. ") The Provider shall perform the services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this Agreement and the performance thereof, to have entered into any partnership, joint venture, employment or other relationship with the City. 2. Additional Services. From time to time hereafter, the parties hereto may agree to the performance by the Provider of additional services with respect to related work or projects. Any such agreement(s) shall be set forth in writing and shall be executed by the respective parties prior to the Provider's performance of the additional services, except as may be provided to the contrary in Section 3 of this Agreement. The performance of services pursuant to an addendum shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement except where the addendum provides to the contrary, in which case the terms and conditions of any such addendum shall control. 10.16.13 Page 1 of 7 RES.D Page 194 of 465 3. Performance of Additional Services Prior to Execution of an Addendum. The parties hereby agree that situations may arise in which services other than those described on Exhibit "A" are desired by the City and the time period for the completion of such services makes the execution of addendum impractical prior to the commencement of the Provider's performance of the requested services. The Provider hereby agrees that it shall perform such services upon the verbal request of an authorized representative of the City pending execution of an addendum, at a rate of compensation to be agreed to in connection therewith. The invoice procedure for any such additional services shall be as described in Section 7 of this Agreement. 4. Provider's Representations. a. The Provider hereby represents and warrants that it has all necessary licenses and certifications to perform the services provided for herein, and is qualified to perform such services. b.. Prevailing Wages. Contractor shall file a "Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages" with the State of Washington Department of Labor & Industries prior to commencing any Contract work that would constitute a Public Work. The Contractor shall pay prevailing wages and comply with Chapter 39.12 of the Revised Code of Washington, as well as any other applicable prevailing wage rate provisions. The prevailing wage rate revision in effect on the date that this Agreement was fully executed is attached and by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof. No payment shall be issued until a Statement of Intent to Pay Prevailing Wages form, for the Contractor and each and every subcontractor, has been approved by the State Department of Labor & industries, and is received by the City. Final payment shall not be released until an Affidavit of Wages Paid form for the Contractor and each and every subcontractor, has been approved by the State Department of Labor & Industries, and is received by the City 5. City's Responsibilities. The City shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of the Provider: a. Designate in writing a person to act as the City's representative with respect to the services. The City's designee shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the services. b. Furnish the Provider with all information, criteria, objectives, schedules and standards for the project and the services provided for herein. c. Arrange for access to the property or facilities as required for the Provider to perform the services provided for herein. d. Examine and evaluate all studies, reports, memoranda, plans, sketches, and other documents prepared by the Provider and render decisions regarding such documents in a timely manner to prevent delay of the services. 10 16 13 Page2of7 RES.D Page 195 of 465 6. Acceptable Standards. The Provider shall be responsible to provide, in connection with the services contemplated in this Agreement, work product and services of a quality and professional standard acceptable to the City. 7. Compensation. As compensation for the Provider's performance of the services provided for herein, the City shall pay the Provider a sum not to exceed $69,237.50, including tax. The Provider shall submit to the City an invoice or statement of time spent on tasks included in the scope of work provided herein, and the City shall process the invoice or statement in the next billing /claim cycle following receipt of the invoice or statement, and shall remit payment to the Provider thereafter in the normal course, subject to any conditions or provisions in this Agreement or addendum. 8. Time for Performance and Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall terminate upon March 1, 2014 9. Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, reports, memoranda, diagrams, sketches, plans, surveys, design calculations, working drawings and any other materials created or otherwise prepared by the Provider as part of his performance of this Agreement (the "Work Products ") shall be owned by and become the property of the City, and may be used by the City for any purpose beneficial to the City 10. Records Inspection and Audit. All compensation payments shall be subject to the adjustments for any amounts found upon audit or otherwise to have been improperly invoiced, and all records and books of accounts pertaining to any work performed under this Agreement shall be subject to inspection and audit by the City for a period of up to three (3) years from the final payment for work performed under this Agreement. 11. Continuation of Performance. In the event that any dispute or conflict arises between the parties while this Contract is in effect, the Provider agrees that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, the Provider shall continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue to work toward successful completion of assigned duties and responsibilities. 12. Administration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be administered by , on behalf of the Provider, and by the Mayor of the City, or designee, on behalf of the City. Any written notices required by the terms of this Agreement shall be served on or mailed to the following addresses: 10.16.13 Page 3 of 7 RES.D Page 196 of 465 City of Auburn Director, Innovation and Technology Auburn City Hall 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 (253) 931 -3160 FAX (253) 876 -1920 Email. rtiedman @auburnwa.gov Provider ID Consulting Solutions, LLC Andrew Rupe Vice President of Technology 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 Phone. 208- 375 -8400 Fax: Email: arupe @idconsol.com 13 Notices. All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this Agreement, to the address for the party set forth above, or if to a person not a party to this Agreement, to the address designated by a party to this Agreement in the foregoing manner. Any party may change its address by giving notice in writing, stating its new address, to any other party, all pursuant to the procedure set forth in this section of the Agreement. 14. Insurance. The Provider shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the amounts described below The Provider shall furnish evidence, satisfactory to the City, of all such policies. During the term of this Agreement, the Provider shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies: a. Commercial General Liability insurance, insuring the City and the Provider against loss or damages arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal injury and advertising injury. The City shall be named as an insured under the Provider's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed for the City, with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000.00 combined single limit for personal injury, death or property damage in any one occurrence. b. Such workmen's compensation and other similar insurance as may be required by law c. Professional liability insurance with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000. d. Automobile Liability insurance covering all owned, non - owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage. 10 16.13 Page4of7 RES.D Page 197 of 465 e. The Provider's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be construed to limit the liability of the Provider to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City's recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity. 15 Indemnification. The Provider shall indemnify, defend and hold the City and its officers, agents and employees, or any of them harmless from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, including attorney fees, by any reason of or arising out of the act or omission of the Provider, its officers, agents, employees, or any of them relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement except for injuries and damages caused by the sole negligence of the City If a final judgment is rendered against the City, its officers, agents, employees and/or any of them, or jointly against the City and the Provider and their respective officers, agents and employees, or any of them, the Provider shall satisfy the same to the extent that such judgment was due to the Provider's negligent acts or omissions. It is further specifically and expressly understood that the indemnification provided herein constitutes the Contractor's waiver of immunity under industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, solely for the purposes of this indemnification. This waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. 16. Assignment. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign any right or obligation hereunder in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. No assignment or transfer of any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obligation under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liability or obligation. 17. Amendment, Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or term of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound, or such party's or parties' duly authorized representative(s) and specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such amendment, modification or waiver. Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall not effect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. Nothing herein shall limit the remedies or rights of the parties hereto under and pursuant to this Agreement. 18. Termination and Suspension. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party terminating the Agreement. 10.16.13 Page 5 of 7 RES.D Page 198 of 465 The City may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days written notice to the Provider if the services provided for herein are no longer needed from the Provider. If this Agreement is terminated through no fault of the Provider, the Provider shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination. 19. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein shall inure to and bind, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise prohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and it does not create a contractual relationship with or exist for the benefit of any third party, including contractors, sub - contractors and their sureties. 20. Costs to Prevailing Party. In the event of such litigation or other legal action, to enforce any rights, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing parties shall be entitled to receive its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 21. Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action hereunder shall be in of the county in Washington State in which the property or project is located, and if not site specific, then in King County, Washington; provided, however, that it is agreed and understood that any applicable statute of limitation shall commence no later than the substantial completion by the Provider of the services. 22. Captions, Headings and Titles. All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to which they apply As used herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been drafted by mutual agreement of the parties. 23. Severable Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 10.16.13 Page 6 of 7 RES.D Page 199 of 465 24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter 25. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be one and the same Agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF AUBURN ID CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC Peter B. Lewis, Mayor Attest: Danielle E. Daskam City Clerk Appr as to arm: iel B. Heid, City Atto ' e 10 16 13 RtSID7 of 7 Name: Title: Page 200 of 465 ID CONSULTING S O L U T I O N S 1.1.c Sales Quote Date September 4, 2013 [TO SHIP TO City of Aubum 25 West Maln Street Aubum WA 98001 Attn Colin Schmalz Same ] Salesperson Job and Locations Shipping Method Shipping Terms Delivery Date Payment Terms Due Date Arupe Wireless Broadband - Install, Provision, Route Power to Wireless AP's 30 days net Site Locations Procurement Auburn Way South and Dogwood Aubum Way South and Muckleshoot Plaza Auburn Way South and R Street Auburn Way South and M Street Auburn Way South and 121h SE Auburn Way South at the Donut Star Brannan Park 30th Street - Point to Point Amt IEvt Price Equipment [Materials 1 ton flatbed 40 Bucket Truck 40 Pickup 40 $3,200.00 $28,300.00: AP Switch Cabinet 8 $21,600.00 AP Brennan to 30th St Point to Point 1 51,200.00 Fiber Splicing - COA Backbone 4 $4,000 00 Wireless Controller 1 $1,500 00 Procurement Total 1 $31,500 -00 Installation Labor $26,000.001 Regular Time Superintendent 40 Wireless Tech 80 Network Engineer 40 Laborer- nagger 40 Electrical Contractor 1 Structural Engineering - AP Mount Design 1 $4,500.00 $1,300.00 lAliowance Traffic Control 1 $5,000.00 Installation Total $31,800,00 Subtotal $62,500.00 Sales Tax (9.5 %) $5,937.50 Total I $69,237.50 Make all checks payable to ID Consulting Solutions ID Consulting Solutions 5531 N Glenwood Street, Boise, ID 83714 Phone 208 375 8400 Fax 888 509 2300 RES.D Page 201 of 465 17 CONSULTING © L U T 1 0 N S September 25, 2013 Colin Schmalz City of Auburn 1 East Main St, Suite 200 Auburn, WA 98002 Subject: City of Auburn WiFi Project Dear Mr Schmalz, ID Consulting Solutions has provided a proposal for the installation of wireless components for the COA's wireless project. The locations to be deployed were selected by COA personnel and confirmed with heat map calculations. The installation locations are listed in the proposal submitted under separate cover Key deliverable elements of this project include: • System design drawings. Plan drawings of fiber routes. Component hardware mounting details. Network topology drawings. Connection details of each cabinet. • Optics at each cabinet will be provided by COA. • We set a throughput benchmark of 10 Mbps throughput at the client — client being a laptop in a vehicle with standard onboard wireless adapter (Intel). Throughput will be different for different devices. Mobile phones will see highest bandwidth at 100 feet from the AP Laptops at 200 feet. Vehicles with a modem will reach out in direct line of sight ^'0.5 miles. • Deliverables will include reverse propagation field study that will assess the actual operating parameters of the system. • Provide and install a wireless WAN controller in the COA Data Room located. The WAN controller will be configured for the COA fiber network in conjunction with COA IT staff. IDCS will provide one afternoon of training on the controller and provide COA with a summary of functions and set up. • Install a wireless AP's at locations listed in this proposal. The AP's will be configured for the COA fiber network in conjunction with COA IT staff IDCS will provide one afternoon of training on the AP's and provide COA with a summary of functions and set up. Our SOW by location will include: Auburn Way South and Dogwood: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. Telecommunications Page 1 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www idconsol corn RES.D Page 202 of 465 ID CONSULTING • 0 L U • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and Muckleshoot Plaza: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and "15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and R Street: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and ^'15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and M Street: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP Pole brackets and ^'15 foot mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and 12th St. SE. • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and "'15 foot mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Telecommunications Page 2 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLG. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idconso! corn RES.D Page 203 of 465 MOW ID CONSULTING S 0 L L.i Y 1 0 N . r Auburn Way South and Donut Star: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. Route new unswitched 120 volt circuit to light pole to power AP ■ Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and -15 foot mast. ■ Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. ■ Installation timeline 4 days. Brannan Park: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. Route new unswitched 120 volt circuit to light pole to power AP. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Mount customer supplied AP to light pole. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul to PTP at 30th Street. • Installation timeline 5 days. 30th Street - Point to Point: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and PTP cabinet. ■ Provide and mount PTP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount bracket for PTP • Mount PTP on bracket. • Aim at PTP on Brannan Park light pole. ■ Installation timeline 4 days. Telecommunications Page 3 of 4 RES.D Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www idconsol.com Page 204 of 465 ID CONSULTING S C I L U T I O N S i_ L r_ Materials we anticipate using include: • Wester' AP cabinet • Motorola 6562 PTP Wireless AP • AP brackets will be selected after structural engineering design of bracket and mast. IDCS will re- generate the computer heat map based on the new AP locations. After deployment and provisioning we will validate the heat map by field measuring signal strength around each AP location. IDCS will deliver a final report of the system performance to COA. Please feel free to give me a call anytime. Thank you for the opportunity to perform the wireless network installation. Sincerely, Andrew Rupe VP of Technology 208.860.0210 (c) Telecommunications Page 4 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idcansol com RES.D Page 205 of 465 TO: City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Aubum WA 98001 Attn: Colin Schmalz Job and II c aViiore.;;.; SHIP TO: Date September cH,, 201 dhillmlfwiing 01hi1wllernIJ Ildent Ihorll 'reams Same eellwauy II 'admen IL 1720e II ens Arupe Wireless Broadband - Install, Provision, Route Power to Wireless AP's Site Locations: Auburn Way South and Dogwood Auburn Way South and Muckleshoot Plaza Auburn Way South and R Street Auburn Way South and M Street Auburn Way South and 12th SE Auburn Way South at the Donut Star Brannan Park 30th Street - Point to Point Procurement Equipment Materials Installation Labor Allowance 1 ton flatbed Bucket Truck Pickup AP Switch Cabinet AP Brennan to 30th St. Point to Point Fiber Splicing - COA Backbone Wireless Controller 40 40 40 8 1 4 1 Regular Time Superintendent 40 Wireless Tech 80 Network Engineer 40 Laborer - Flagger 40 Electrical Contractor 1 Structural Engineering - AP Mount Design 1 Traffic Control 1 30 days net Procurement "Tot nstallllatuoln " otall Sasllvtot all II cs tax " sa' Ilene Date Oast Deice $3,200.00 $28,300.00 $21,600.00 $1,200.00 $4,000.00 $1,500.00 $26,000.00 $4,500.00 $1,300.00 $5,000.00 9 $69,237.50 RES.D Page 206 of 465 September 25, 2013 Colin Schmalz City of Auburn 1 East Main St, Suite 200 Auburn, WA 98002 of Subject: City of Auburn WiFi Project Dear Mr. Schmalz, ID Consulting Solutions has provided a proposal for the installation of wireless components for the COA's wireless project. The locations to be deployed were selected by COA personnel and confirmed with heat map calculations. The installation locations are listed in the proposal submitted under separate cover. Key deliverable elements of this project include: • System design drawings. Plan drawings of fiber routes. Component hardware mounting details. Network topology drawings. Connection details of each cabinet. • Optics at each cabinet will be provided by COA. • We set a throughput benchmark of 10 Mbps throughput at the client — client being a laptop in a vehicle with standard onboard wireless adapter (Intel). Throughput will be different for different devices. Mobile phones will see highest bandwidth at —100 feet from the AP. Laptops at 200 feet. Vehicles with a modem will reach out in direct line of sight —0.5 miles. • Deliverables will include reverse propagation field study that will assess the actual operating parameters of the system. • Provide and install a wireless WAN controller in the COA Data Room located. The WAN controller will be configured for the COA fiber network in conjunction with COA IT staff. IDCS will provide one afternoon of training on the controller and provide COA with a summary of functions and set up. • Install a wireless AP's at locations listed in this proposal. The AP's will be configured for the COA fiber network in conjunction with COA IT staff. IDCS will provide one afternoon of training on the AP's and provide COA with a summary of functions and set up. Our SOW by location will include: Auburn Way South and Dogwood: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. Telecommunications RES.D Page 1 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idconsoPage 207 of 465 • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and Muckleshoot Plaza: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and R Street: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and M Street: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Auburn Way South and 12th St. SE: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and AP cabinet. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Provision and connect AP for fiber backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Telecommunications RES.D Page 2 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idconsoPage 208 of 465 of Auburn Way South and Donut Star: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. Route new unswitched 120 volt circuit to light pole to power AP. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Provide and mount mast for AP. Pole brackets and —15 foot mast. • Mount customer supplied AP on mast. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul. • Installation timeline 4 days. Brannan Park: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. Route new unswitched 120 volt circuit to light pole to power AP. • Provide and mount AP cabinet on light pole. • Mount customer supplied AP to light pole. • Provision AP for mesh backhaul to PTP at 30th Street. • Installation timeline 5 days. 30th Street — Point to Point: • Electrical Contractor to permit and terminate 120 volt wiring. • Open splice case and splice into one additional pair of fiber strands into traffic control cabinet. Terminate new fiber in traffic control cabinet and PTP cabinet. • Provide and mount PTP cabinet on traffic pole. • Provide and mount bracket for PTP. • Mount PTP on bracket. • Aim at PTP on Brannan Park light pole. • Installation timeline 4 days. Telecommunications RES.D Page 3 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idconsoPage 209 of 465 of Materials we anticipate using include: • Westell AP cabinet • Motorola 6562 PTP Wireless AP • AP brackets will be selected after structural engineering design of bracket and mast. IDCS will re- generate the computer heat map based on the new AP locations. After deployment and provisioning we will validate the heat map by field measuring signal strength around each AP location. IDCS will deliver a final report of the system performance to COA. Please feel free to give me a call anytime. Thank you for the opportunity to perform the wireless network installation. Sincerely, Andrew Rupe VP of Technology 208.860.0210 (c) Telecommunications RES.D Page 4 of 4 Facilities Energy ID Consulting Solutions, LLC. 5531 N Glenwood Street Boise, ID 83714 208.375.8400 www.idconsoPage 210 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5009 Department: Finance Attachments: Res 5009 and Contract Year -end Memo Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 25, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council to approve Resolution No. 5009 Background Summary: Resolution No. 5009 authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an agreement for services with the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to operate a visitor information center, promote tourism awareness within the City and to provide services associated with supporting the City's Economic Development efforts. Per agreement with Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce and the Auburn Tourism Board, the City of Auburn will direct users that sign on to the City's free, public Wifi service "Access Auburn" to the Auburn Tourism Board's website homepage. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember: Partridge Staff: Coleman Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.E RES.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 211 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 0 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO OPERATE A VISITOR INFORMATION CENTER, PROMOTE TOURISM AWARENESS WITHIN THE CITY AND TO PROVIDE SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH SUPPORTING THE CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS WHEREAS, The City is engaged in its projects of operating a visitor information center, promoting tourism and economic development, and is in need of services of individuals, employees or firms for organizational work on said project; and, WHEREAS, the City collects a lodging tax for the purpose of promoting Auburn as a tourist destination; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant to provide certain services in connection with the City's work on said projects; and WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified and able to provide consulting services in connection with the City's needs for the above - described work /project, and is willing and agreeable to provide such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS. Resolution No. 5009 November 6, 2013 Page 1 of 2 RES.E Page 212 of 465 Section 1. Purpose. The Mayor and the City Clerk of the City of Auburn are hereby authorized to execute an Agreement for Services with The Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce to operate a Visitor Information Center and to provide services associated with supporting the City's economic development efforts in substantial conformity with the copy of the Agreement attached hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this resolution. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. DATED and SIGNED THIS ATTEST. Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPRP ' ED T• FORM: Daniel B eid, City Attorney Resolution No. 5009 November 6, 2013 Page 2 of 2 DAY OF ,2013 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS MAYOR RES.E Page 213 of 465 EXHIBIT A CITY OF AUBURN - AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AGREEMENT FOR TOURISM SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this day of , 20 l_ by and between the City of Auburn, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter referred to as "City" and the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, The City is engaged in its projects of operating a visitor information center, promoting tourism, and economic development, and is in need of services of individuals, employees or firms for organizational work on said project, and, WHEREAS, the City desires to retain the Consultant to provide certain services in connection with the City's work on said projects, and, WHEREAS, the Consultant is qualified and able to provide consulting services in connection with the City's needs for the above - described work /project, and is willing and agreeable to provide such services upon the terms and conditions herein contained. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows_ Scope of Services. The Consultant agrees to perform in a good and professional manner the tasks described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. (The tasks described on Exhibit "A" shall be individually referred to as a "task," and collectively referred to as the "services. ") The Consultant shall perform the services as an independent contractor and shall not be deemed, by virtue of this Agreement and the performance thereoff, to have entered into any partnership, joint venture, employment or other relationship with the City 2. Additional Services. From time to time hereafter, the parties hereto may agree to the performance by the Consultant of additional services with respect to related work or projects. Any such agreement(s) shall be set forth in writing and shall be executed by the respective parties prior to the Consultant's performance of the services there under, except as may be provided to the contrary in Section 3 of this Agreement. Upon proper completion and execution of an addendum (agreement for additional services), such addendum shall he incorporated into this Agreement and shall have the same force and effect as if the terms of such addendum were a part of this Agreement as originally executed. The performance of services pursuant to an addendum shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement except where the addendum provides to the contrary, in which case the terms and conditions of any such addendum shall control. In all other Page 1 of 9 RES.E Page 214 of 465 respects, any addendum shall supplement and be construed in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 3 Performance of Additional Services Prior to Execution of an Addendum. The parties hereby agree that situations may arise in which services other than those described on Exhibit "A" are desired by the City and the time period for the completion of such services makes the execution of' addendum impractical prior to the commencement of the Consultant's performance of the requested services. The Consultant hereby agrees that it shall perform such services upon the oral request of an authorized representative of the City pending execution of an addendum, at a rate of' compensation to be agreed to in connection therewith. The invoice procedure for any such additional services shall be as described in Section 7 of this Agreement. 4 Consultant's Representations. The Consultant hereby represents and warrants that he has all necessary licenses and certifications to perform the services provided for herein, and is qualified to perform such services. 5 City's Responsibilities. The City shall do the following in a timely manner so as not to delay the services of the Consultant: a. Designate in writing a person to act as the City's representative with respect to the services. The City's designee shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define the City's policies and decisions with respect to the services. b Furnish the Consultant with all information, criteria, objectives, schedules and standards for the project and the services provided for herein. c. Arrange for access to the property or facilities as required for the Consultant to perform the services provided for herein. d. Examine and evaluate all studies, reports, memoranda, plans, sketches, and other documents prepared by the Consultant and render decisions regarding such documents in a timely manner to prevent delay of the services. 6 Acceptable Standards. The Consultant shall be responsible to provide, in connection with the services contemplated in this Agreement, work product and services of a quality and professional standard acceptable to the City 7 Compensation. As compensation for the Consultant's performance of the services provided for herein, the City shall pay the Consultant the fees and costs specified on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof (or as specified in an addendum). The Consultant shall submit to the City an invoice or statement of time spent on tasks included in the scope of work provided herein, and the City shall process the invoice or statement in the next billing/claim cycle following receipt of the invoice or statement, and shall remit payment to the Consultant thereafter in the normal course, subject to any conditions or provisions in this Agreement or addendum. Page 2 of 9 RES.E Page 215 of 465 8 Time for Performance and Tenn of Agreement. The Consultant shall perform the services provided for herein in accordance with the direction and scheduling provided by the City The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the date hereof and shall terminate on December 31, 2014, or upon another date if mutually agreed to in writing by the parties, subject to the restrictions in Section 18 9 Ownership and Use of Documents. All documents, reports, memoranda, diagrams, sketches, plans, surveys, design calculations, working drawings and any other materials created or otherwise prepared by the Consultant as part of his performance of this Agreement (the "Work Products ") shall be owned by and become the property of the City, and may be used by the City for any purpose beneficial to the City 10 Records Inspection and Audit. All compensation payments shall be subject to the adjustments for any amounts found upon audit or otherwise to have been improperly invoiced, and all records and books of accounts pertaining to any work performed under this Agreement shall be subject to inspection and audit by the City for a period of up to three (3) years from the final payment for work performed under this Agreement. 11 Continuation of Performance. In the event that any dispute or conflict arises between the parties while this Contract is in effect, the Consultant agrees that, notwithstanding such dispute or conflict, the Consultant shall continue to make a good faith effort to cooperate and continue work toward successful completion of assigned duties and responsibilities. 12. Administration of Agreement. This Agreement shall be administered by the Chief Executive Officer of the Chamber, on behalf of the Consultant, and by the Mayor of the City, or designee, on behalf of the City Any written notices required by the terms of this Agreement shall be served on or mailed to the following addresses: City of Auburn Auburn City Hall 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 -4998 (253) 931 -3000 FAX (253) 288 -3132 Consultant Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce 108 N Division, Suite B Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 833 -0700 Fax (253) 735 4091 13 Notices. All notices or communications permitted or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been duly given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this Agreement, to the address for the party set forth above, or if to a person not a party to this Agreement, to the address designated by a party to this Agreement in the foregoing manner Page 3 of 9 RES.E Page 216 of 465 Any party may change his, her or its address by giving notice in writing, stating his, her or its new address, to any other party, all pursuant to the procedure set forth in this section of the Agreement. 14 Insurance. The Consultant shall be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages and in the amounts described below The Consultant shall furnish evidence, satisfactory to the City, of all such policies. During the term hereof, the Consultant shall take out and maintain in full force and effect the following insurance policies: a. Comprehensive public liability insurance, including automobile and property damage, insuring the City and the Consultant against loss or liability for damages for personal injury, death or property damage arising out of or in connection with the performance by the Consultant of its obligations hereunder, with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 00 combined single limit for personal injury, death or property damage in any one occurrence. b Such workmen's compensation and other similar insurance as may be required by law c. Professional liability insurance with minimum liability limits of $1,000,000 00 15 Indemnification. The Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, agents and employees, or any of them from any and all claims, actions, suits, liability, loss, costs, expenses, and damages of any nature whatsoever, by any reason of or arising out of the negligent act or omission of the Consultant, its officers, agents, employees, or any of them relating to or arising out of the performance of this Agreement. If a final judgment is rendered against the City, its officers, agents, employees and/or any of them, or jointly against the City and the Consultant and their respective officers, agents and employees, or any of thein, the Consultant shall satisfy the same to the extent that such judgment was due to the Consultant's negligent acts or omissions. 16 Assignment. Neither party to this Agreement shall assign any right or obligation hereunder in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party hereto. No assignment or transfer of any interest under this Agreement shall be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obligation under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a secondary liability or obligation. 17 Amendment, Modification or Waiver. No amendment, modification or waiver of any condition, provision or terin of this Agreement shall be valid or of any effect unless made in writing, signed by the party or parties to be bound, or such party's or parties' duly authorized representative(s) and specifying with particularity the nature and extent of such amendment, modification or Page 4 of 9 RES.E Page 217 of 465 waiver Any waiver by any party of any default of the other party shall not effect or impair any right arising from any subsequent default. Nothing herein shall limit the remedies or rights of the parties hereto under and pursuant to this Agreement. 18 Termination and Suspension. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other party if the other party fails substantially to perform in accordance with the terms of this Agreement through no fault of the party terminating the Agreement. The City may terminate this Agreement upon not less than seven (7) days written notice to the Consultant if the services provided for herein are no longer needed from the Consultant. if this Agreement is terminated through no fault of the Consultant, the Consultant shall be compensated for services performed prior to termination in accordance with the rate of compensation provided in Exhibit "B" hereof. 19 Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein shall inure to and bind, the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns, provided that this section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise prohibited by this Agreement. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties hereto and it does not create a contractual relationship with or exist for the benefit of any third party, including contractors, sub - contractors and their sureties. 20 Costs to Prevailing Party. In the event of such litigation or other legal action, to enforce any rights, responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement, the prevailing parties shall be entitled to receive its reasonable costs and attorney's fees. 21 Applicable Law. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action hereunder shall be in of the county in Washington State in which the property or project is located, and if not site specific, then in King County, Washington; provided, however, that it is agreed and understood that any applicable statute of limitation shall commence no later than the substantial completion by the Consultant of the services. 22. Captions, Headings and Titles. All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to which they apply As used herein, where appropriate, the singular shall include the plural and vice versa and masculine, feminine and neuter expressions shall be interchangeable. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any Page 5 of 9 RES.E Page 218 of 465 determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been drafted by mutual agreement of the parties. 23 Severable Provisions. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable. If any provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. 24 Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding of the parties hereto in respect to the transactions contemplated hereby and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to such subject matter 25 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be one and the same Agreement and shall become effective when one or more counterparts have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed effective the day and year first set forth above. CITY OF AUBURN AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Peter B Lewis, Mayor Attest: Danielle Daskam City Clerk Approv-f as to • AAt L4r4.4.1 Dwie1 B Held, 5 Attorney RES.E Name. Title: Name: Title: Page 6 of 9 Page 219 of 465 EXHIBIT A TASKS AND SERVICES Service as Auburn's Visitor Information Center: Annually $25,000 • Handle inquiries made by visitors, new residents and employees via phone, e -mail, mail, walk up, and respond with the appropriate information and materials • Operate the City's storefront Visitor Information Center where visitors obtain materials and advice during normal business hours. The center will provide sufficient space, display racks, appropriate materials and receptionist. • Produce and distribute the City business directory, community profile, street maps, and lists containing information about community resources and/or business services • Respond to requests from publishers seeking information about Auburn for their magazines, web pages and /or directories. • Provide City hotels with brochures promoting local attractions, businesses and shops. Provide support and service to the City's economic development goals and outreach to current and future business community members. Annually $15,000 • Assist the City in meeting with current and potential businesses to discuss inducements to conducting or locating a business in Auburn. • Provide input, feedback and serve on City technical and advisory committees for issues. {Proposed city codes, comprehensive plans and updates, design review, proposed capital improvements, city business processes, and other emerging issues mutually agreed upon). • Serve as the referral service for individuals seeking to do business with an Auburn business. • Meet with and provide tours of the City, when scheduling permits, for prospective business investors in conjunction with the City's Economic Development Manager and Planning Department. Actively promote Auburn to prospective new business investors by attending meetings and providing appropriate information. • Maintain and provide demographic information up to a 30 -mile radius from the downtown area. • Organize and conduct orientations for new employee groups as an incentive for businesses to locate in Auburn. Page 7 of 9 RES.E Page 220 of 465 Provide a service to promote Tourism Awareness for the City of Auburn. Annually $45,000 • Coordinate all public relations, marketing, media relations, advertising, and event planning for the Auburn Tourism Board. • Liaise on marketing and communications matters and coordinate with the individual Board members, who comprise representatives from the City Council, the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, all the major attractions, the lodging sector and other tourism - related businesses. • Follow up on activities to involve existing and new strategic partners • Once a year the consultant shall provide a report to the Finance Committee on progress made with the Tourism Awareness project. • Operate and maintain a website, and allow the City to use that website as a main "landing site" for the City's Access Auburn public wi -fi project. Page 8 of 9 RES.E Page 221 of 465 EXHIBIT B COSTS Annual compensation for the scope of work herein is not to exceed $85,000_ Page 9 of 9 RES.E Page 222 of 465 TO: MEMORANDUM CITY OF AUBURN MAYOR, COUNCIL MEMBERS, FINANCE COMMITTEE, PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AND COMMUNITY & PLANNING DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE FROM: AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE SUBJECT: SERVICES AGREEMENT UPDATE /CONTRACT RENEWAL - VISITOR INFORMATION CENTER, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & TOURISM DATE: 11/7/13 CC: AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Dear Mayor & City Council Members, Thank you for this opportunity to present you with an end -of -the -year report identifying some of the highlights of the services the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce is pleased to have provided the City pursuant to our contract for services. As you know, these services assist the City by supplementing its efforts with regard to Visitor /Tourism Information, the City's Economic Development Goals and Outreach to Current and Future Business Community Members in ways that leverage the credibility, experience and resources of the Chamber. While there is some overlap, I have organized this summary to encompass the general scope of services in the referenced contract, as follows: SERVE AS AUBURN'S VISITOR INFORMATION CENTER: Handle inquiries made by visitors, new residents and employees via phone, email, mail, walk -in and respond with the appropriate information and materials: Operate the City's storefront Visitor Information Center where visitors obtain materials and advice during normal business hours. The center will provide sufficient space, display racks, appropriate materials and receptionist. RES.E Consistent with the terms of the contract for services, the Chamber maintains and operates Auburn's Visitor Information Center where people know to seek out the Chamber as the first point of contact, whether a visitor, existing resident or new resident, existing business or prospective business, to obtain a wide variety of materials and advice. The Chamber - operated Visitor Information Center dominates the entire front portion of the Chamber's Lobby, with easy visibility & access from the street. It includes large display racks stocked with varied and valuable visitor - related materials. Page 223 of 465 The Visitor Information Center signage on the storefront is a large banner across the first three windows to loudly state "Visitor Information Center "; and with a larger window sign that boldly lists Auburn Tourism as one of the main components in our office and offers the universal "I" symbol denoting an information center is located here. With each walk -in, visitors and prospective businesses are able to take multiple pieces of information that the Chamber provides. It is often their first point of contact in our community. When we mail out relocation and /or vacation packets, a variety of information is sent, including information about the City of Auburn, parks & recreation, public art, the golf course, trails, etc., as well as Auburn businesses and visitor services. The valuable contribution the Chamber is uniquely able to provide in its contract with the City, is our ability to staff the Visitor Information Center with employees having extensive personal knowledge of the greater Auburn area, and a genuine desire to promote the City of Auburn. Produce and distribute the City business directory, community profile, street maps, and lists containing information about community resources and /or business services. Respond to requests from publishers seeking information about Auburn for their magazines, web pages and /or directories. Provide City hotels with brochures promoting local attractions, businesses and shops. The Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce produces a Community Directory each quarter, with the most up -to -date information. So far this year we have distributed approximately 5,000 directories. We have found that our new approach to printing the directories on an as- needed basis has helped our newest businesses get the most exposure right away. We currently distribute these Community Directories to: • City Hall • Member advertisers for use with prospective and current customers and firms • Auburn Library • Muckleshoot Library • Senior Center • Parks & Rec Building • Auburn Airport • Local Hotels • Small Business Assistance Center • Green River Community College • The SuperMall • All event visitors that deal directly with our Tourism Marketing Director • New teachers (in conjunction with the New Teacher Breakfast hosted by the Chamber, MultiCare Auburn Medical Center, Green River Community College, private schools and the Auburn School District's recruitment efforts); and • We mail out the Community Directory in the Chamber's "Relocation /Tourism /Inquiry Packets" 211 RES.E Page 224 of 465 The Chamber's Community Directory continues to receive a very strong response from the Auburn Business Community. We believe the desire of local businesses to advertise in the Community Directory is an affirmation of the effectiveness of the Chamber's Community Directory in presenting the strengths and assets of the Auburn area, and local businesses, to both current and prospective visitors. They see it as a primary resource for direct contact with their customers and clients. The Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce also produces a Local Area Map every two to three years. 5,000 of each edition are printed. Our map is currently being updated with delivery for January 2014. This will include the newly renamed streets of The Outlet Collection Way and The Outlet Collection Drive. We currently distribute these Local Area Maps to: • City Hall • Member advertisers • Auburn Library • Muckleshoot Library • Senior Center • Parks & Rec Building • Auburn Airport • Local Hotels • Small Business Assistance Center • Green River Community College • The SuperMall • All event visitors that deal directly with our Tourism Marketing Coordinator • New teachers (in conjunction with the New Teacher Breakfast hosted by the Chamber and the Auburn School District's recruitment efforts); and • We mail out the Local Area Map in the Chamber's "Relocation /Tourism /Inquiry Packets" 31' RES.E Page 225 of 465 PROVIDE SUPPORT AND SERVICE TO THE CITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS AND OUTREACH TO CURRENT AND FUTURE BUSINESS COMMUNITY MEMBERS. Assist the City in meeting with current and potential businesses to discuss inducements to conducting or locating a business in Auburn. Provide input, feedback and serve on City technical and advisory committees for issues. (Proposed city codes, comprehensive plans and updates, design review, proposed capital improvements, city business processes, and other emerging issues mutually agreed upon.) Serve as the referral service for individuals seeking to do business with an Auburn business. Meet with and provide tours of the City, when scheduling permits, for prospective business investors in conjunction with the City's Economic Development Manager and Planning Department. Actively promote Auburn to prospective new business investors by attending meetings and providing appropriate information. Maintain and provide demographic information up to a 30 -mile radius from the downtown area. Organize and conduct orientations for new employee groups as an incentive for businesses to locate in Auburn. Chamber leaders and the Chamber's President & CEO have been active participants on the all important Streets Task Force (twice); took the lead in getting a ballot measure for a vote on road improvements; and took the lead on the Urban Core Task Force, a 50- year visioning process for the downtown area and surrounding business community. The Chamber's President & CEO also served on the recent Airport Master Plan update committee. The Chamber's President & CEO has greatly appreciated the opportunity to be called in as an active participate in significant recruitment and retention meetings, partnering with the City's Economic Development Manager and the City's Planning Director. The Chamber developed a new series of business improvement courses in partnership with the Small Business Development Center (SBDC) as a matter of business retention for the City of Auburn. We are working diligently to improve our existing businesses so they may thrive and expand here in our city. The next series of 12 courses will begin in January 2014. Chamber staff members and board members have been active in giving "windshield tours" of the city to prospective businesses whenever requested. The Chamber participates, along with other chambers, with the Valley Cities Mayors' group to identify issues where it may forge and implement partnerships on issues critical to enhance economic vitality for Auburn, and the south -end region. The Chamber is also an integral founding partner on the South Sound Chambers of Commerce Legislative Coalition (SSCCLC) that puts forth issues to better our region's economy. The Chamber continues to be the Administrator for the SSCCLC. Chamber board members, especially executive committee members, have actively (proactively) been reaching out to current businesses to stay in Auburn. We have been 41' RES.E Page 226 of 465 engaging our members in this outreach to better fill their existing needs; a key to retention. Starting in January 2014, the Chamber will be implementing a new program called "Twelve at Twelve ", where business leaders will be invited to lunch with the President & CEO to discuss how the Chamber can better serve the business community to help our businesses thrive. This year of 2013 has seen an increase in businesses relocating to our city or brand new businesses opening. The Chamber has had a 75% increase in ribbon cuttings /open houses over 2012. We take this as a positive message that the City of Auburn and the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce continue to recruit and retain businesses throughout our community. 51' RES.E Page 227 of 465 PROVIDE A SERVICE TO PROMOTE TOURISM AWARENESS FOR THE CITY OF AUBURN. Coordinate all public relations, marketing, media relations, advertising, and event planning for the Auburn Tourism Board. Liaise on marketing and communications matters and coordinate with the individual Board members, who comprise representatives from the City Council, the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, all the major attractions, the lodging sector and other tourism - related businesses. Follow up on activities to involve existing and new strategic partners. Several Chamber Board Members and the President & CEO participate on the Auburn Tourism Board, working to bring tourists to our area. This effort both builds the growing strength of our local tourism economy and generates additional sales tax revenues to support city services including both capital and operational expenses. As part of our 5 -year Strategic Plan, the Chamber's leadership is committed to pursuing a community -wide, partnership effort to market on a consistent basis a branded welcome message to tourists in connection with all the major events that put heads in beds, dollars in retail establishments and seats in restaurants. Our Tourism Marketing Director, Debbie Luce, has provided a comprehensive report to the Mayor and City Council Members on the progress of the Tourism Board and the great strides made with that Board. This report highlights the success of our website and SEO efforts to bring more tourists to our city. (See separate report from Debbie Luce.) 611 RES.E Page 228 of 465 Summary Data Regarding Visitor Information, Tourism & Economic Development Inquiries The following data reflects recorded Chamber activity in responding to Visitor Information Center (Tourism) and Economic Development Inquiries from January 1, 2013 through November 7, 2013. Visitor Information Center /Tourism Walk -ins 4,526 (people are finding us since the reopening of Division St.) Phone 12,937 Email 30,107 (this has gone up more, due to SEO on tourism website) Mail Incoming 1,042 Outgoing 12,005 (many more relocation requests included in this number) Economic Development Walk -ins 53 Phone 458 Email 22 Mail Incoming 9 Outgoing 36 General Information Request (non VIC /Tourism /ED related) Combined 9,756 Amount of time spent on each: Walk -ins: 15 - 60 minutes Phone: 3 - 30 minutes Email: 3 - 5 minutes Mail: 3 - 15 minutes Thank you for the opportunity to provide you with this year -end status report identifying some of the highlights of the services the Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce is pleased to provide the City pursuant to our contract for services. We look forward to another year of providing these essentials services for the City of Auburn. Sincerely, AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Wyatt sident /CEO 71' RES.E Page 229 of 465 Auburn Tourism Board 2013 Accomplishments Overall Accomplishments that follow the Strategic Plan: > Worked with Finance Senior Accountant for monthly financial review > Maintain Website and Blog > Negotiated 2013 contract with Clear Channel for banners at the Sounder Train Station > Participate in City Events representing the Tourism Board > Answer all tourism related questions from walk -ins and phone calls 1. Respond to all tourism information requests with follow up if necessary - phone, mail and website 2. Respond to all newcomer inquires about Auburn > Update Chamber staff on current events that are tourism related > Update Tourism Partners and Hotels on current events > Continue to work closely with Auburn Downtown Association, City of Auburn, Parks Department, Multimedia, Senior Citizens Supervisor and Cultural Arts to assist in promotion, advertising and up coming events > Continue to work with Auburn School District to promote school functions that need hotel accommodations: Bands for Veterans Day Parade, Soft Ball and Fast Pitch Tournaments, Sport Cup Stacking Tournament, Miss Auburn Pageant, etc. > Other groups: YMCA, NW Skating Invitational at Auburn Skate Connection, Auburn Airport, Tanoa Bowl > Continue branding in all forms of printed materials, banners, ads, website design > Hold and coordinate ATB meeting > Prepare all paperwork for meeting including agenda, financials and minutes > Send Agenda to City for all meetings > Attended all ATB meetings, organized meetings and produced meeting materials > Acquire brochures from around the State each year to display in Chamber lobby > Organize and maintain visitor information material in Chamber lobby > Work with and visit all hotels on a monthly basis - more if needed > Check all websites of attractions on a weekly basis for updated information Develop and Implement ATB Monthly Update Calendar > Distribute Updated Calendar to hotels to inform front desk staff and management of upcoming events > Post monthly calendars in 7 locations: B Street Plaza kiosk, Train Station, Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, Auburn Ave., The Outlet Collection Guest Service, Safeway and The Auburn Downtown Association. > Keep Safeway Deli Manager updated on events that will affect staffing > Updates and FYI's go to all of the ATB partners on a regular basis > Updates also act as a communication tool to update partners on important information that might affect their business > Give updated calendar each month to the Chamber Director of Communications which is used in weekly email updates > Acquire tourism article each month in the Chamber Connections newsletter > Keep up -to -date restaurant list, with recommendations on large group choices RES.E Page 230 of 465 Tourism Website > Working with Genesis Marketing to provide Search Engine Optimization Management > Working with Genesis Marketing to provide Social Media Marketing such as Facebook > Post two or three monthly contests on Facebook Page > Acquire prizes for contests > Genesis Marketing has been reporting the hits that our website gets each week (Please see attached latest report) > Have added map locations to all attraction, hotels, businesses and restaurants > Ensure lodging and restaurant information is complete and valid > Added ADD AN EVENT to website so that organizations can add events to our calendar > Sent letter to all Organizations & Clubs in Auburn encouraging them to add their events to our calendar using ADD AN EVENT button > Up -to -date attraction information > Up -to -date new business information > Working on content development and updating on a weekly basis > Post all current events > Add links and remove them as needed > Add news and media articles > Update any Hotel or Business Partner changes > Answered all inquiries from site > Worked on maximization of links to appropriate businesses > Things To Do section automatically populates from the calendar > Auburn News on site generates from Tourism Blog > Auburn News site is updated daily to assure all news is current > Highlight month's largest events on website Home Page Continue to Update Tourism Fact Sheet > Update all facts on the two -sided sheet as needed > Displayed in Chamber lobby > Send out in every information and newcomer packet Maintain partner contact list > Maintain list on a monthly basis > Continue to seek new valued partners Local Community Outreach Program > Participate in yearly Association of Visitor Information Centers of Washington (AVICW) Conference > Attended AVICW Conference planning meetings with other Board Members > Became President of AVICW October 2013 > Retained all speakers for 2013 Conference > Produced all hand out material for Conference > Held 2013 Board Meeting 2013 Conference > Welcome Display at the front counter of the Finance Department with business cards, brochures and directions to Visitor Center RES.E Page 231 of 465 ➢ Worked with Reporter to have them add Tourism Website and ADD AN EVENT to the beginning of their Calendar Of Events as a permanent section ➢ Worked with the Auburn Reporter to receive extra Residence's Guide to the Chamber to be placed in all newcomer packets ➢ Continued to reach out to service clubs and organizations as guest speaker ➢ Developed Tourism Packet for visitor as well as business travelers for HR departments ➢ Maintained a great working relationship with all major local and area attractions and local hotels ➢ Maintain an ongoing branding image for Auburn Tourism ➢ Found Sponsor for International Farmers Market Tote Bag for the 5th year ➢ Assisted EmD 3 on 3 Basketball Tournament finding sponsors ➢ Attended The Outlet Collection Unveiling on October 17, 2013 ➢ Board member Auburn Arts Walk ➢ Manned booth at the Art Walk ➢ Board Member Auburn Wine Art & Music Festival ➢ In charge of vendors and set -up at Wine Art & Music Festival Our goal in 2009 was to continue to educate our local citizens by showcasing all the tourism opportunities available in Auburn. We also wanted to promote the opening of the Auburn International Farmers Market. This being accomplished in 2009 our goal was to expand our outreach outside of Auburn. The Board of Directors and the Lodging Tax Advisory Board decided to have a Wedding Show to accomplish our goal while still showcasing all that Auburn has to offer. The 2010 Autumn Wedding Show at Emerald Downs was a huge success allowing us to host an even larger Wedding Show in 2011. There were over 3,000 guests attending the 2010 and 2011 show. Auburn businesses were given a $100 discounted vendor rate and prime booth placement. Our hotels were given free 5 x 10 booth space. The 2012 Wedding Show attendance was down but the vendors reported they had quality bookings and were very happy. In 2013 the Board of Directors and the Lodging Tax Advisory Board decided to go in a different direction and not host a 2013 Wedding Show. Our focus in 2013 was to promote events that already exist in Auburn as well as new events. We promoted EmD3 on 3 Basketball Tournament by sponsoring 32 Pole Pads. Each pad said City of Auburn Washington Tourism Board Stay & Play Auburn www au urn touris n co n. With the Outlet Collection renovation and their extensive marketing we sponsored the Connect Kids soft play area. Both events were great for tourism. We knew we needed to step up on Social Media Marketing such as Facebook and Search Engine Optimization Management. We hired Genesis Marketing to implement our 2013 Goal. We sponsor two to three contests each month on our Facebook page. It is another great way that we can advertise Auburn's events. RES.E Page 232 of 465 Hotel Occupancy > Occupancy is at the highest it has been since 2008 > Each month is higher than the previous year (Please see attached page for comparison) > Summer months were at their all -time high. Numbers started to rise at the same time social media began > Emerald Downs 3 on 3 Basketball Tournament in August aided occupancy as well as The Outlet Collection, Pacific Raceways & and Emerald Downs Racing > Visit hotels regularly asking if they have special groups coming in that we can make welcome bags for their guests (great PR) > Have assisted hotels with various issues on a regular basis > Continue to distribute "Thank You for Staying" in hotels that are given to large groups and special guests > Will once again work with hotels offering Winter Rates from November thru March > Also established Special Rates for Emerald Downs, MultiCare Auburn Medical Center, Funeral Homes, Auburn Airport Advertising > Researched all possible free advertising > Member of the Tacoma Visitor and Information Center and in the Tacoma Visitor Guide > Arranged inclusion in calendar in Hometown Values - Free > Linked our site to all area attraction websites > Sponsored EmD 3 on 3 Basketball Tournament Pole Pad at Emerald Downs > Hotel occupancy was very high in August due to various events. EmD 3 on 3 Basketball Tournament brought teams from the surrounding areas as well as the entire State. If they did not stay in our hotels they spent money at stores and restaurants to boost tax revenues in Auburn > EmD 3 on 3 Basketball Tournament had 291 teams (Please see attached photo) > In charge of advertising Auburn Wine Art & Music Festival > In charge of advertising Art Walk > Acquired FREE advertising quarterly in Show Case Magazine & Website Action Items and Goals which follow the Tourism Board's Program of Work > Increase Hotel Occupancy > Promote Auburn as a Arts and Entertainment Destination > Compile a complete data base of Washington Associations & Organizations > Promote Auburn as a great place to host Group Conferences > Assist Hotels with promotions and packages during slow months when occupancy is down > Re -sell the Banners at Sounder Train Station and sign a new contract with Clear Channel > Continue to grow our partnerships > Continue to work with Economic Development Manager to bring Conference Groups to Auburn > Continue to work with Auburn Airport Manager assisting them with aviation events & seminars they wish to move from Puyallup to Auburn RES.E Page 233 of 465 > Continue to work with Sport Cup Stacking event planner to find a place in Auburn to hold the 2015 event > Continue to provide up -to -date information about our city > Continue to work with Tacoma South Sounds Sports with over -flow room nights > Change advertising strategy to promote Auburn on radio, TV and websites > Work to bring in new events > Assist all entertainment properties promoting their Special Events > Work with Green River Community College to provide International Students and their parents special information packets about Auburn > Work with Washington Tourism Alliance to make sure we continue to promote Washington and our community > Member of the Washington Tourism Alliance > Member of Association Visitor Information Center of Washington (AVICW) > Member of Tacoma Convention & Visitor Bureau RES.E Page 234 of 465 Dates 5/13-5/19 Auburn Tourism Website Site V Auburn Tourism ebsite er week Total Um 447 re Vi 305 N ber of New Visit 182 7/99 -8/4 548 456 411, 3/5 -8/11 8/12 - 25 577 73__ 534 600 432 416 551 320 8/26 -9 . 9 / 9/9 -9/15 417 420 323 2 289 289 346 269 220 9/16 92 366 281 9/23 _, 343 273 239 237 28 -x, 22 RES.E Page 235 of 465 (31e- Arlihtfir''..57i '.!)••••• • &tun Trautirpon Good tomp.whOeffir ahlibliemouthsen..trom Auburn Tourism Board Location Map Overlay Surnmary City ViSitS 134 vgd Oct 28 2013 - Nov 3, 2013 Agiovisitieri Beihervist 0erwasseksee Visits % New Visits New Vigils leassnsii He Pages Mogi. Vilsin Visit DjiIoi Opal: (),041 0441 Conversion Compleilions Valise Rale 404 70 ..05% 283 67.33% 106 00:02:27 0...00% 0 $0., 00 ,,,,,610 SSW ','Stti.lt MIS It, dliiiiisly, Sde A,SS SOS ASO' Sae ,t,,Vgi Sifit A.,,i(g. % 40 Tata "A', ■'..4 00.4k (DON (283 MAO% I. (0.00%) !;th.:00%.11 10.00%). 0 UP% i$.65, OW 1 . ikubun n 134 5:17:3% 72 78.35% 221 000214 0 DO% 0 50 00 2. Si.x.me Viige,,y 43 44 19% 19 0,3.02%, 107 000113 00D 0 5000 3, SeOffle 29 62,14% 23 42,86% 243 000118 0130% 0 !sox) 4 . raUnna 15 9110.7' "11y 13 40 00% 4.80 000114 0 IXT 0 50,00 5 ,'3', pxyka.no. 14 7 14'.% 1 984 00 1420 0.00%, 0 50 00 O, PeO,Nai v.),,i'a,,/ 12 93 33% 10 50.60% 509 0003,10 0.00% 0 50.00 ?. mo1 se0 11 90011% 10 90.913 3 27 0001 33 0,0013 0 50.00 a Kew 9 75,x,N,„ $ u■P1,00% 1,75 0000 14 0,00% 0 50,00 9 7 8811% 6 65,71% 1,14 0000015 0000 0 5000 10 e ro,,,,,,,tup., $ LI oo00% 5 40.00% 3.00 0001 16 0.00%, 0 0000 5 90„00% 4 100,00% 1,00 000000 0,00%, Page°236$6r465 1, MANIA ttMlbst A "lc 10 q, 1 "14. ruvu, I An fliSihn. 1 n 0 nem, ili 1511 riel 13, Perrkel 14, IL.,45 .444404.4„ W,44114.14400. Banney v.„,e5s, 17, ilMes, Moines 24,0"rin 10.. Burnaby. 20, R Ch OVii0Va 21, HonsesSei 22.. Gurnee 23.. Gig Herbal 24„. 91941mand 25.. Woodensiillte 25 Coviropme 27.. f.taney 28.. Rchreend 29.. Caen 30.. sran juran 31. Nizteme Mossered 32, 1.1Lub586,5 aa. Anchorne 34.. ,A1 lexandor (My 35, 101,X,00 36.. 1,11,c,7415:33m9r9 32, 01:911116 38, 125901 301 cilleesiege 40,, 90510 41, '10569 421 11,99961, 43, t".3urpla park, 44, 0591059 45 P halla 40, 42, SememeeMe 4E1, 'Mores Le103, 45 RM0ele,00 50, l'aree:o 51, Ateseta RES.E :0 4, carvers 33,33% 1 100,00%, 1,00 000000 0,00% 0 50,00 3 100,00% 3 66,67% 133 0000,06 0,.00* 0 30,00 3 10000% 3 100,00% 1,00 000000 000% 0 30,00 3 100.00% 3 33,33% 2.33 000250 0.00% 0 3000 3 0 00% 0 10000111 1,00 000000 0 00* 0 30,00 3 100,00% 3 100,00% 1,00 000000 0.00% 0 30,00 2 50 00% 0 00%, 4.50 0001,05 0 00% 0 30 00 100,00% 2 100,00% 1.00 00,0000 000* 0 5000 100,00% 2 0,00% 3,00 000055 0 00* 0 30,00 2 100 00% 2 50,00% 300 00,08.10 0.00% 0 30.00 100 00% 2 50 31 3,00 00,00,30, 0 00% 0 3000 2 100 00% 2 50 00%. 1 50 000035 0.00% 0 30.00 2 100.00% 2 100.00% 1 00 0000,00 0.00% 0 30.00 2 100 00% 4 50.00M, 4 50 000217 0.00%, 0 30,00 I 10000* 1 000* 300 00:01.11 0.00%. 0 3000 I 100 00% 1 000 13 00, 0027,38 0.00* 0 50 00 I 10000% 1 100.00% 100 0000,00 0.00% 8 30,00 I 100 00% 1 0 GO% 1500 00,07.20 0.00% 0 30 00 I 100 00% 1 100.00% 100 00:00.00 0.00% 0 3000 1 100 00% 1 10000* 100 00.00.00 0.001 0 50.00 I 100 00% 1 0.00% 4 00, 00,02.50, 0.00* 0 30 00 I 100 00% 1 100.00%, 1.00, 00,0000 0.00% 0 30 GO 1 10000* 1 10000* 100 000000 000* 0 30.00 'I 100 00% 1 100.00%, 100 000000 000* 30.00 1 10000* 1 10000* 100 000000 080* 0 5008 1 101300* 1 100 00% 1 00 000000 0.00"11, 0 50 00 1 100 00% 1 800* 500 00,0040 0 00% 0 30.00 1 100 60% 1 100,00% 100 0000,00 0.00%, 0 30,00 1 1100.00% 1 0 00%, 700 00 2601 0.00%: 0 5000 1 10000* 1 10000* 100 00.0000, 0130* 0 3005 1 10000% 1 100.00%. 1,00' 000000 0 00* 0 3000 1 100 00% 0 „ % 6.00 0001:23, 0 00% 0 30 80 1100,00% 1 10000% 1 00 000000 0,00% 0 30,00 i 100.00% 1 0,.*1 % 7,00 00;01 10 000 0 $0,00 1 100.00% 1 10050* 1 00 000000' 0 00% 0 5000 1 100,00% 1 10000% 1,00 000000 000* 0 5000 1 11)0.00% 1 0,004 2,00 000018. 0,00% 0 $0,00 1 10000% 1 000% 5,00' 00,0058 0,00%. 0 50,00 11 100 00% 1 100,00% 1100 000000 0.00% 0 30.00 1 100,00% 1 100,00% 100 , 00,0000 0,00% Page023730465 53, Lawn-enc.:END ile 1 100A.% 1 100. % 1.00, 54, Pearl CI ily 1 000% 0 0,00% 600 56, Fort Wayne 1 10000% .9 10000%, 900 56, iRchos,,,prold 11 100009 1 aao% ttoo, 5? , Franmrozoin 1 100.:0006: 1 0.00%, 3.00, 08. Mitrord 11 '100.60% 1 0,00% 15,010 50. fi. 11 10000% 1 '100,0014 . t..00, 50, Boniphan 11 10000% 1 0300%. .4.00, 61. ..4,1hemlk 1 100009 1 100.50%, 1.00, 62.. Grand Forks 11 100.20% 11 0.0014 11 ..00 53, Gardnervg0e 1 10000% 1 000%, 6.00, 64.. 11. ..at Vegas 11 100.0014 11 0.0014 5.00 05. Hamburg 1 1000014 1 100.00% 100 56, 000nrilmrsi 11 100.00% 1 100..00% 1 .00, 07. Chibhn 1 lockno% 1 lockam, 1..o0, 05. .rolled5 1 1000014 1 100.00%, 1.06 00. ,,Veat, 1 100..0014 1 100.00% 1..00 70.. 14 1 Pl,ss 1 10000% 9 0.0003 4.00, 71.. tielmstIrm 11 900.0014 9 000%, 7..00 72., NY.I.Notn.^gg '1 10000% 1 0,00%, 21.00, 73.. P.0111.and 1 10020% 1 0..6096, 2013 .. 74.. V.Vetst IL.. HMI 1 10000% 11 100..00%, 1.00, 75„ 0 t.s1"001,orn 1 100..00% 1 100.00%, 76.. J...4111V), MOM bigq• 1 1 00.:00% 1 100.O0 i .00, 7 v 1 10000% 1 000% 12,00 70, Delman 11 1002014 1 00014 , 1500 70, Hathrom 1 100.00% 1 1006014 .1.00, 50, 1 ex:an:aria 11 100.009 1 00014 21,00 al 3 1 100,00% 1 100,00% 9,00 $2, F,a4fax 1 100.00% '1 100,05% 100 83, erde0evo,k4, 11 100009 1 0,00% 2013 84, 113V1 091 1 1000014 1 100009 1,00, 65. Edmonds 11 100.609 1 000% 31,00. 66 1 l0000% 1 ov00% 4,00 $7, KtirkIland 11 1000014 1 l0000% too 86 1 loo.„00% 1 0.60% 400 oo, pkwywaie 1 l0000% 1 02014 6,00 50.. P),,lercer Ntand 1 1060014 1 100,0014 1..00, 01, Mo,untake 'Terrace, 11 10020% 0009 14,00 'RE afE0a 1 1000014 1 1000014 1.05 0000..00 0 % 0 $0.00 000 218 0,00%, 0 $0.00 000000 0,0014 0 50,00 0001..54 0.0014 0 30.00 000047 0.00% 0 $0.00 000003, 0,00% 0 $0,00 000000 0.0014 0002.26 0.00% 00.00.00, 000% 0117..40, 0.00% 0002..44 0.0003 0 $0.00 Ga 1352: 0.00% 0 $0.00 000020 0.00% 0 301 0000.00, 0.0014 0 30.00 000000 0.0013 0 50.00 00:0000 0.0,00A., 0 $0.00 000000, 00004 0 30 00 0001..17 0.00% 0 30.00 000031 0.00% 0 3 000405 0.0014 000020 00004 00.0000, 0.0003 0 30.00 000000 0.009 0 30.00 00,0000 , 65014 0 50.00 000223 0, op% 0 60 44 000412 0,0004 0 woo 000000 0,0096 0 $0,00 001551 0,00% 000000 0.0004 0 60.00 000000 0,00% 0 50,00 000042 0,00% 0 ,woo 000020 0,0019 0 30,00 00..1000 0,04114 0 50.00 1000103 0,00% 0 50 00 000000 00014 , 0 50.00 000132 0.14 0 $0.00 000120 000% 0 woo 0000,00 0.00% 0 $0,00 0008..93 00004 0 30.00 000005 0.N% Page02385M0465 0 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 0 50.00 50 00 3000 L. WOR ownsena 94, 95 1111ortIon 96. Sequgm Sksnmroer 111 11113s1Ka2gaD 9•. Yak iJ916 100. Ve1n1 101. Sid henboach 102, 61110c 1.06, C6p5,606'6. roonoxPl 104. 16116 vall 106, 1',1•qien1alke 106., Gnarl' 1.1e Bay 107.. 1J RIvel 108. Moon 100. 11Pe,,, &YID Key 110, Tukwila UUlb •00,00% 100.0011 100.00% 1 100. % 1 100,00% 1 ;0000% 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 1 10000% 1 100,00% 000011 1 100“00% 1 100,00% 1 100.00% 100.003% 1 100.00% 1 100.00% 5 U ULPIN1 4,/ ,UU, UV tl,Dr4,1 U.UU'Ve U WILY UU 1 0,00% 3,00 00,0046 0,0011 0 11„00 1 0.0011 4.00 00..00:42 0.0011 0 $0 00 1 0.00% 4.00 00.06:10 0,00% 0 1,0 00 1 100.0011 1.00 00:00:00 0.0011 0 $0 00 1 100.0011 1.00 00.00:00 0,00%, 0 60,00 1 100.00% 1 00 00:00:00 060% 0 SO CO 1 100.0011 1,00 00:00:00 0.0011 0 50.00 1 100.0011 1.00 00:00:00 0.0011 0 10. 00 1 100,0011 , 1,00 006060 0,0011 0 $0.00 1 10000% 1.00 00:00:00 0,0011 0 O 00 1000011 1.00 00.00.00 0 00% 0 $0 00 1 0,0011 33,00 00,41,40 0,0011 0 S0.00 1 0.00% 2,00 00:00:06 0.0011 0 S0.,00 1 1000011 1.00 000100 06011 0 $0.00 1 0.0011 3.00 00:00:21 00011 0 $0 00 1 0.0011 11,00 00:02.07 0.0011 0 0..00 1 100,00% 1.00 000100 0,0011 0 $0,00 Rtms 1 11001W 00 2013 Googlle RES.E Page 239 of 465 i1IlI^IImVIIIIIUInmIIIII1011 F11111n01 (1II�111 ��111,i¶ X1111101111111111 mm1(1111111111u 11111111111111111111111111(1 111(1111111111(1101111111(11111111 1111000001 January 4,988.19 February 4,899.28 March 5,085 83 April 5,582.25 May 6,918.54 June 5,903.52 July 7,011.84 August September Octobe r November December Total 8,175.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,805.48 4,338.02 5, 164.02 5,512.21 6,126.65 5,327.86 5,907.34 7,510.11 9,592.74 9,561.68 8,018.42 6,278.38 4,408.54 3,924.63 3,739.381 4,261.78 4,979.60 ........................................ ............................... 4,785.03 4,988.83 6,398.22 8,343.35 8,072.35 6,221.70 4,934.32 4,187.22 4,349.77 3,740 05 4,821.83 5,517.50 5,220.99 5,257.78 6,464.41 7,866.70 7,466.00 6,771.17 4,885.90 4,708.87 5,368.21 4,682.611 5,329.88 5,686.68 ...................................... ............................... 5,389.75 6,170.36 6,066.66 8,506.46 8,081.33 ...................................... ............................... 5,765.87 5,020.92 OIIOn11Olnlfml1111II1N1V111 III 111111111111 48,565.04 78, 142.91 65,057.73 66,549.32 70,777.60 6,020.46 5,649.88 5,697 38 6,364.41 7, 144.04 ................................................ ............................... 6,790.24 7,729.65 7,763.98 9,879.88 9,914.39 .................................................. ............................... 7,495.69 6,087.12 86,537.12 RES.E Page 240 of 465 ekes Name Horse Pad Ad Preview Auburn Tourism Auburn Tourism Campaign Facebook Campaign Sep. 15t - Dec. 31' Budget: $1000 For the Week of Oct. 28- Nov. 3 .. 2 U hdl !.3pe'I V t? 1104 379 1.5 72.84 Edit Targeting Auhurn has a Class One racetrack In their backyard. What are you racing in your backyard? ma` 1 ke 1.4. c I„ 1kr 1:911n 1 ,1, I:4 Pacific Raceways Ad Preview Get Iu400 Gear Status', Ad Reach 3,516 Freq. Clicks. " Click- Through Rate I Avg. Price I Total Spent I Likes , I This ad targets 32,000,000 people, • Who live in the United States • Who live in Hawaii, Idaho, Alaska, 610503na, Oregon, Washington or California • W00 are not already connected to Auburn Tourism -Its More Than You Imagined Edit Targeting Auhurn has a racecourse and drag strip in its backyard. What does your backyard have? Lb." I Ike • 3, in „ I <r A IL a naii IU an alI tared, Ad Preview Daily Peak and Winners Uv •I. 1,003 This ad targets 32,000,000 people: • Who live in the 'Abed States • Who live in Hawaii, Idaho, Alaska, Montana, Oregon, Washington or California • Who are net already connected to Auhurn Tourbm -Its More Than You Imagined wt" Felt Targeting Auhurn invites you to 61111 at the Plucckleshoot Casino. Try Poker, Pal Gap or Craps1 inn Like 1,1 ., N T" ug A 1:: T,urp;rrl This ad targets 32,000,000 people: • Who live in the United States • Who live in Hawa3, Idaho, Alaska, Montana, Oregon, Washington or Caldnmia • Who are not already connected to Auhurn Tourism -Its More Than You Imagined 77 1,395IPo ., a092 11.050% I 1 11011 a 538.10 1i[ Performance 60 Cost per Page Like 30.64 90.5'2 1. 00.32 / Edit Performance CTR .... 50..00 /E E,llt Peiorrmance Auburn Tourism-Es 0010 50,, You PEE-.Jin d Lkes ,p n l'ore?,I Stories 3,989 1.4 59 1.2534', 56 FS 534.14 43 50.79 Lrrv, Sponsored IN Preview TO FdIY Targeting AlrileIn. Ei nil 14ne Than 501.1Imagned , Alohmeil lLou.arisr its 6»10' More Than You Iomaiained st,} I be Vi eu✓ on a.ight Mond eiit Ad Preview Nora (Miss the C rescouts. LIT ril<r This sponsored story targets 400,000 people :: • Who live in the United States • Who live In Hawaii, Idaho, Aaska, Montana, Oregon, Washington or California • Who are not already connected to Auhurn Tourism-Its More Than You Imagined • friends of people who liked the page Auhurn Tourism -Its More Than You Imagined, friends of people who checked In to the page Auhurn Tourism -Its More Than You Imagined or Whose friends are already connected to Auhurn Tourism-Its More Than You Imagined d` Ed,F Targeting Auhurn Has a 6.0 piece orchestra In is backyard. What are you listening to in yours? I rllr rr 0,00II, This ad targets 32,000,000 people; • Who Ilve In the Unted States • Who live In Hawaii, Idaho, Alaska, Montana, Oregon, Washington or California • Who are not already connected to Auburn Tourism -Its More Than You Imagined Edit Performance 060 Performance CTR Page-24170 465 1,111111111111 1111111 IIII '1.111111 11111,11 111 J � i 1 STAV AI,IC,,'k,1'RS RES "E WA SI'iI ol,I AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5011 Date: November 25, 2013 Department: Attachments: Budget Impact: Public Works Res 5011 $0 Administrative Recommendation: City Council approve Resolution No. 5011. Background Summary: Public Works Department - Equipment Rental Division: The following vehicle has been replaced and there is more value in selling the vehicle than in retaining and repairing: 6515C — Ford Superduty 4x4 with service body — VIN: 1 FDNX21 L52EC89478 — Fixed Asset 550006515C Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Public Works Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Dowdy Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: RES.F RES.F AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 244 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 1 1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DECLARING CERTAIN ITEMS OF PROPERTY AS SURPLUS AND AUTHORIZING THEIR DISPOSAL WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Public Works Department has a number of items which are no longer of use to the City; and WHEREAS, it would be appropriate to surplus the property and dispose of it by auction or other sale mechanism, or to dispose of it, in whole or in part, through gift to another governmental agency or an appropriate charitable non- profit entity, as deemed most expedient by the Mayor. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. Purpose. That the property identified below is declared to be surplus, and the Mayor is authorized to dispose of and convey such property through appropriate sale or donation to another governmental agency or charitable non - profit entity. Public Works Department EQUIPMENT RENTAL DIVISION: The following vehicle has been replaced and there is more value in selling the vehicle than in retaining and repairing: Resolution No 5011 November 25, 2013 Page 1 of 2 RES.F Page 245 of 465 6515C — Ford Superduty 4x4 with service body — VIN: 1 FDNX21 L52EC89478 — Fixed Asset 550006515C Section 2. Implementation. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. Effective Date. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this day of , 2013. CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS ATTEST. MAYOR Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FO ),, „ P ix.. O.— Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Resolution No. 5011 November 25, 2013 Page 2 of 2 RES.F Page 246 of 465 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5012 Department: Parks /Art and Recreation Attachments: Res 5012 Ordinance 6480 Model Picture Front View Plan Picture of location Petition Regarding American Vietnamese War Memorial Charter Memorial Application Administrative Recommendation: Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5012. Background Summary: Attached is the Memorial Application as completed by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance. In addition, copies of the design, location, and other correspondence related to the proposal are enclosed along with Resolution No. 5012. Reviewed by Council Committees: Municipal Services, Planning And Community Development Councilmember: Backus Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 RES.G Staff: Faber Item Number: RES.G AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 247 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 1 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE REQUEST FOR PLACEMENT OF A JOINT VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL TO BE LOCATED IN LES COVE PARK WHEREAS, the City of Auburn is an inclusive community and strives to make all of its citizens feel welcome and a part of the City; and WHEREAS, the City also recognizes the importance of parks and City property in the community and the use of city parks to acknowledge and recognize issues of value and importance to the community; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the process set forth in City of Auburn Ordinance No 6480 and Chapter 2 97 of the Auburn City Code, the City has received an application from the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance (AVWMA) for a Memorial to recognize and honor the veterans of the Vietnam War, and to express thanks and appreciation for the efforts of those who were engaged in that war; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn acknowledges that many servicemen and women returning from Vietnam were met with the hostility that accompanied the anti -war sentiment that was prevalent in much of American society at the time, and WHEREAS, it is appropriate, particularly in Tight of Auburn's participation in the program celebrating the 50th Anniversary Commemoration of the Vietnam War that Auburn acknowledge and recognize the efforts of those who served in the Vietnam War, thanking them for their service and acknowledging the validity of their mission, and Resolution No 5012 November 26, 2013 RES.(P, age 1 of 4 Page 248 of 465 WHEREAS, the proposed Memorial seeks to display the American flag along with the Vietnamese Freedom and Heritage Flag as a way to recognize those who fought for the freedom of South Vietnam, recognizing, as well, the validity and noble purpose of their efforts, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds value in the proposed Memorial and sees it as meeting the purposes and criteria for approval of Chapter 2 97 of the City Code for placement of memorials in city parks, and WHEREAS, in order to accommodate the request of the AVWMA for the Memorial and to support the many people who have endorsed the proposal for the Memorial being located in Auburn, it is appropriate that placement of the Memorial in a City park be approved; and WHEREAS, the City Council also finds and acknowledges that the commitment of support by the City is a crucial component for the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance to be able to solicit and collect funds, and to expend funds for the design, construction, installation and maintenance of the proposed Memorial. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows. Section 1. The City Council approves the request for the proposed Memorial in conformity with the application received from the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance, provided that the location of the Memorial shall be at Les Gove Park, and provided that the AVWMA shall commit to be obligated to maintain the Memorial in perpetuity, and provided that the English Resolution No. 5012 November 26, 2013 RES.(;�age 2 of 4 Page 249 of 465 Language text of the message of the Memorial shall list the "United States" before the "Republic of Vietnam " Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the placement of the Memorial at a suitable location approved by the City Council at Les Gove Park so as to empower the AVWMA to engage in fund raising for the proposed memorial, and to complete design, construction and installation of the Memorial at Les Gove Park, and entitling th e AVWMA to make commitments there for So that the AVWMA shall have sufficient time and opportunity to collect funds, complete design, and commence construction and installation of the Memorial, the City's commitment for and authorization of placement of the Memorial shall be for a period of ten (10) years after the date of the passage of this Resolution, by which time construction and installation of the Memorial shall have been commenced; provided that AVWMA shall present to the City Council a status report within five (5) years of the date of the passage of this Resolution, and further provided that if additional time is needed by AVWMA to commence construction and installation of the Memorial, the AVWMA shall be granted one five (5) year extension of the time - period described herein above Section 3 The City Council further authorizes the Mayor to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation, including execution of written agreements with AVWMA to formalize the commits and obligations of the AVWMA and the City for the design, construction, installation and maintenance of the Memorial. Resolution No 5012 November 26, 2013 RES.(;age 3 of 4 Page 250 of 465 Section 4. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon Dated and Signed this day of , 2013. CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS, MAYOR ATTEST, Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPRO ED AS TO FORM D Y iel B Held, ity • ttorn Resolution No 5012 November 26, 2013 RES.�age 4 of 4 Page 251 of 465 ORDINANCE NO. 6 4 8 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 2.97 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE, DEFINING A PROCESS FOR CONSIDERING REQUESTS FOR PLACEMENT OF MONUMENTS, MEMORIALS AND STRUCTURES TO BE LOCATED IN CITY PARKS AND ON CITY PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Auburn is an inclusive community and strives to make all of its citizens feel welcome and a part of the City; and WHEREAS, the City also recognizes the importance of parks and City property in the community; and WHEREAS, different than the first amendment — freedom of speech - rights of individuals or entities to express themselves, whether in City Parks or other public forums, the City recognizes its rights to control what structures are constructed on City Parks and on its property; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate that a process be defined so that any citizens, groups or entities who are proposing, requesting or interested in monuments, memorials and structures to be located in City Parks and City property know the process through which those requests would be considered and approved; and WHEREAS, the City also desires to preserve its rights to control what permanent structures are erected in City Parks and/or on City property, and the City reserves the right to determine which structures convey a positive community messages in keeping with the City's Policy, as stated herein, for structures to be located in City Parks and /or on City property; and Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 1 of 8 RES.G Page 252 of 465 WHEREAS, the City is receptive to and inviting of requests by individuals and organizations to have monuments, memorials and structures placed in City parks, within the parameters of the City's intended message and purpose, and so long as they are in keeping with the City's policy for monuments, memorials and structures to be located in City Parks and on City property, as described and referenced herein. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Creation of a New Chapter to the City Code. A new Chapter 2.97 of the Auburn City Code (ACC) be, and the same hereby is created to read as follows: Chapter 2.97 MONUMENTS TO BE LOCATED IN CITY PARKS AND ON CITY PROPERTY Sections 2.97.010 Purpose and introduction. 2.97 020 Definitions. 2.97.030 Government speech on monuments. 2.97.040 Administration. 2.97 050 Donated and private funding of monuments. 2.97 060 Review process. 2.97 070 Review criteria. 2.97.080 Public right of way. 2.97.090 Other policies. 2.97.010 Purpose and introduction. A. The City may, from time to time, decide to install permanent Monuments on City property to provide the City's commemoration of persons or events of note, or to otherwise convey the City's position on various topics ( "referred to as "Government Speech "). The City retains, in its sole discretion, the rights to control the message of monuments in its City Parks and on its public property. An Application Form shall be available from the City Clerk and from the Parks Department for use by private individuals, groups and entities who wish to request placement of Monuments in City Parks or on City property B. By placing Monuments on City property, the City intends only to engage in Government Speech and does not intend to open a public forum for free speech activity. Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 2 of 8 RES.G Page 253 of 465 C The purpose of this Chapter is to establish criteria and guidelines for the consideration and installation of Monuments on City -owned property deemed by the City to be appropriate to serve as the site for a Monument. In doing so, the City recognizes the following considerations. 1. Monuments can convey a powerful connection between Auburn and its history, and in some instances its future. 2. It is therefore important that the placement of Monuments be limited to circumstances of the highest community -wide importance, both to maintain the significance of such Monuments and to minimize conflicts with the active and variable use of public spaces. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City may decide, in its sole discretion, to reject a proposal for a Monument and/or may determine the appropriate site for any and all City Monuments. 2.97.020 Definitions. A. The following definitions apply to this Chapter: 1 "Government Speech" means the speech of the City per the doctrine addressed in Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of Univ. of Va., 515 U.S 819, 115 S.Ct. 2510, 132 L.Ed.2d 700 [1995] and cases relying thereon. Under this doctrine, when the City retains the power to control the message conveyed, the statements and expressive actions are Government Speech of the City even if it uses other persons or entities to communicate its messages. 2. "Monument" means a marker, statue, or other similar permanent structures and installations to express Government Speech, as described and referenced in this Chapter, and which are installed by the City on City property, or which are accepted by the City and installed on City property with City permission, and subject to the following: (a) Monuments may be in various forms including statues, fountains, buildings, or gardens among other forms of monuments as determined by the City. (b) Monuments do not include items dedicated in parks, such as benches, trees, small plaques (plaques not larger than five (5) square feet in size), and other memorials with a dollar value that does not exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00), as determined by the estimated or anticipated cost of purchase or construction and installation or placement; Provided, however, that if the monument requires a building permit, it shall be included in the definition of monuments. (c) Monuments do not include memorial signs as defined in the City's Memorial Sign Program (Chapter 12.68 ACC). B. In the event that a question arises as to whether a proposal falls within the scope of this Chapter or these definitions, or if a question arises as to how the proposal falls within the scope hereof, the City Council shall have the sole discretion to decide such questions and to make determinations relating thereto 2.97.030 Government speech on monuments. A. City's Government Speech Topics. The City may install or accept City - approved Monuments on City property as a form of "Government Speech" as City Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 3 of 8 RES.G Page 254 of 465 recognition of significant events or people or to provide information from the City on topics approved by the City, as set forth below. 1 The contributions of individuals or groups who made a substantial impact upon the City, the Auburn Community, King County, Pierce County, Washington State, or the United States; 2. The City's position on topics of interest to the community, as determined by the City Council; 3. The history of Auburn, the State of Washington, or of the United States, 4. Historical or cultural influences on Auburn; 5 Native flora, fauna and wildlife of Auburn and the greater Auburn Area — the area surrounding Auburn and regionally in the vicinity of Auburn, 6. Local innovation or creativity that has contributed to Auburn's growth and prosperity; or 7 Other criteria selected by the City Council and set forth in an amendment to this Chapter. B. The City shall not place Monuments on City property which have the purpose of promoting, favoring or inhibiting any religion or which would appear to a reasonable person that the City is promoting, favoring, or opposing a religion. 2.97.040 Administration. A. The Mayor may recommend to City Council the approval or denial of monument proposals. The Mayor may enact administrative guidelines and procedures to implement this Chapter, including procedures for consideration of locations deemed amenable to Monuments. The Mayor shall also designate the Lead Department or Departments for Monuments located on City property depending on the proposed location of the Monument and the potential impact to City Departments. B. Notwithstanding that certain City property is operated or managed by a private operator pursuant to an agreement, the evaluator of the Monument and the final decision maker shall be the City Council and not the private operator or manager C The Director of the Lead Department shall coordinate with the Director of Parks, Art and Recreation if there are any questions or issues as to whether a proposed Monument is primarily Public Art, or whether it otherwise fits into the City's Public Art programs. 2.97.050 Donated and private funding of monuments. A. In accordance with Chapter 2.87 ACC, the City encourages private donations to the City to support various City programs and City operations, which may include without limitation, the cost of acquisition, installation and maintenance of Monuments on City property. The City prefers to receive private donations in the form of funds that may be used by the City to review, design, fabricate, acquire, install and/or maintain Monuments, rather than the donation of a completed Monument. B. However, the City may from time to time, at City's sole option, consider accepting a completed Monument as a form of Government Speech, provided that the Monument meets the City's approved Government Speech topics and also meets all of the other criteria set forth in this Chapter and in any related administrative guidelines or Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 4 of 8 RES.G Page 255 of 465 procedures. After City Council's acceptance of a Monument, which acceptance shall be through an appropriate process approved by the City Council, and subject to City's explicit approval of installation of the Monument upon City property, title to the Monument shall vest with City and the City may remove, relocate and shall otherwise have sole control over the Monument. C. While the City appreciates donations of Monuments to the City, the City is under no obligation to accept any donated Monument even if the Monument meets, or could be said to meet, all of the criteria set forth in this Chapter. The City's decision to accept a donated Monument may also depend upon the cost to the City of design, fabrication, installation and maintenance of the Monument and site considerations, among other factors. D. The City may, at its option, decide for budgetary reasons to prioritize Monuments where the City expects to receive donated funding to cover the cost of design, fabrication, installation and maintenance of the Monument. Unless otherwise agreed by City Council, the donor of a proposed Monument is responsible for providing the City with funds to cover the cost of review, design, fabrication, installation and maintenance to ensure adequate care for the Monument. 2.97.060 Review process. A. The Mayor or his or her designee shall provide the initial screening of Monument proposals to determine if the proposed Monument complies with the provisions of this Chapter including without limitation, to evaluate the suitability of the proposed Monument site, if any, so that a report and recommendation may be prepared for the City Council in advance of its decision on the proposal. If the Mayor's decision is to conduct further review of the proposal based upon considerations consistent with this Chapter, the proposal shall be referred to the appropriate department, so the report and recommendations to the Council can address the considerations and criteria of this Chapter B. The Lead Department shall prepare a report for consideration by the City Council and such board or commission designated by the City Council, if any, and shall coordinate with the Mayor and with other affected departments. The Lead Department shall submit an advisory recommendation to the Mayor for the Mayor's review regarding the Monument based upon the factors set forth in this Chapter and the Review Criteria set forth below. After the Mayor's review, and amendments and modifications (if any) the Mayor shall then forward the recommendation to the City Council. C The City Council shall have final approval of a City project to design and construct a Monument, or to accept a donated Monument. D The Mayor shall, on at least a quarterly basis, submit a report to the City Council informing the City Council of any and all Monument donations and application proposals received by the City, and the Mayor's recommendations regarding each proposal. E. All required environmental review shall be approved by the City's planning department before the City commits to installing a Monument. The Monument shall be consistent with adopted City master plans unless those plans are amended as a part of the review process. Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 5 of 8 RES.G Page 256 of 465 F. While a formal building permit is not required, the Building Official shall review the structure and site plan to ensure conformance with the building code adopted by Washington State. G Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City Council may decide, in its sole discretion, to reject a proposal for a Monument and/or may determine the appropriate site for any and all City Monuments. H. Notwithstanding any other provisions of the Auburn City Code, the process set forth in this Chapter shall be the only City process for reviewing the siting or location of monuments. 2.97.070 Review criteria. A. A proposed Monument must: 1. Pass City safety and liability exposure review. 2. Conform to the approved Government Speech topics. 3. Be made of durable materials, able to withstand the elements for a minimum of 50 years with minimum maintenance. 4. Be made of materials resistant to vandalism and graffiti as much as is reasonably possible. 5. Be of a scale, materials, color and style appropriate and consistent with aesthetics of the proposed location of the Monument and such other reasonable factors as the City determines, including but not limited to sight distance, safety, and other applicable requirements for structures as set forth in the Auburn City Code. 6. Conform to the requirements of the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) to ensure that there is a path that allows access to the monument. 7. Conform to the adopted building code to ensure that the footing and monument are structurally adequate. B. The City shall also consider whether: 1. The person, group or event being memorialized deemed by the City to have made a significant enough contribution to merit a Monument of the scale, cost and visibility of the proposed Monument. 2. The Monument duplicates existing Monument themes. Multiple monuments for similar or related groups are disfavored. 3. The Monument proposal has been the subject of one or more public meetings conducted by the Monument's proponents. The public meeting shall be conducted in accordance with ACC Section 18 02.030. 4. The proposed Monument has the general support of the persons or community that the Monument is intended to honor. 5 The proposed site in the park or plaza for the Monument is related to the underlying purpose of the Monument or the site in the park or plaza has been designated in a master plan or other approval of the City Council as a particularly appropriate site for a proposed Monument. 6. The Monument has been designed by or under the direct supervision of a qualified professional in the art or design field, and provides a quality, scale, and character commensurate with the location, circulation, and use patterns of the City property. Qualified professionals include registered architects, engineers, landscape Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 6 of 8 RES.G Page 257 of 465 architects and artists who can demonstrate professional recognition in the form of public commissions or permanent public installations. The City may solicit input from such professionals, and from planners or urban designers in making this determination. Monuments shall not displace the intended function and or use of said property, as articulated in adopted master plans or similar City documents. 7 There is a committed and verifiable funding source for the review, design, fabrication, installation and maintenance of the Monument before proceeding to incur City costs and staff time. The proponents of the Monument agree to enter into an agreement to provide the City with funds that cover the cost of review, design, fabrication and installation, and an adequate endowment to cover the cost of the Monument's maintenance as determined by City. Alternatively, the City may consider accepting an agreement from a group to maintain a Monument in perpetuity and in accordance to City Standards rather than a cash endowment. 2.97.080 Public right of way. The public right of way shall not be considered as a site for Monuments, except as provided for in Chapter 12.68 ACC. 2.97.090 Other policies. A. Nothing in this Chapter is intended to supersede or limit any other City Code Sections or Administrative Policies, including, but not limited to: the City's Policies and Procedures for its Art in Public Places programs, whether the art is privately or publicly funded, and the provisions of Ordinance No 6243 (including Chapter 2.85 ACC) and Resolution No's. 4546 (Percent for Art) and 4323 (Integrated Artwork), and the Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department Policies and Procedures for Gift Acceptance and Donor Recognition. B. This Chapter does not cover temporary installations on City property, nor does it limit the City's ability to place signage or plaques on City property to provide donor or sponsor recognition, public information regarding a City project, or to place historical markers or to provide other information to the public. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall Ordinance No, 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 7 of 8 RES.G Page 258 of 465 not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law OCT -- 7 2013 INTRODUCED: PASSED. APPROVED. OCT - 7 2013 ATTEST ,6dZe Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Published. Ordinance No. 6480 September 23, 2013 Page 8 of 8 RES.G PETER B LEWIS, MAYOR Page 259 of 465 Revi Attachment A Showing US flag higher than Vietnamese Freedom and Heritage flag RES.G Page 260 of 465 Er772111 1-77121rzi rit!„=„42E! 11111111111111111111111111111111111MINNINN11111111111111111111HINNINN 40 00 1, ,00,2 nn.n. " 7111M711.1d1111111111111111 w0J 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 00, ,00000, 1111111101M. 11111111111'1111111111 0 n""0"01110:1"1"011i00,00nn .041 1M MEW r . 0141190:04",0"." LJ iliV1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111MMIMMIMIN RES.G ,111 .1iL■.Y■ Page 261 of 465 1111111111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111111 1.1.11111111111 mzmaaawmmmnmmmmmnnmmmmmmmmmmmmmm IVY c cb 0), NIIIIN1111!„:"ft!!,11„11110!!, 1:1:0111111011111011)11V1011(00V,41:1 • .111111111 • ) ( 11,0111%„/ + 73 00 I I I 0 C: CO • ) 0 W) I le— 0 J) oz I I 0 rii z 911 RAMMIAMIll Fri .Ho LJ r" !■!!'f!!!fff!!!!fpf,'' RES.G Page 262 of 465 ATTACHMENT D — Picture showing location of memorial in Veterans Memorial Park Footprint of memorial RES.G Page 263 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:57 AM To: Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Support Vietnamese American War Memorial Please have these added to the record with Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Xuan Nguyen <xnguyen201 I @vahoo.com> Date: August 14, 2013, 7:41:04 AM PDT To: "plewis @.auburnwa.gov" <plewis @auburnwa.gov >, "nbackus@auburnwa.gov" <nbackus @auburnwa.gov >, "iholman@aubumwa.gov" <iholman@auburnwa.gov >, "inairidge@a,auburnwa.gov" <ipairidgenu,auburnwa.gov >, "rwagnereauburnwa.gov" <rwagner@auburnwa.gov >, "Iwale @,auburnwa.gov" <Iwale @auburnwa.gov >, "bpeloza@a,auburnwa.gov" <bpeloza@auburnw a.gov >, "wosborne(a,,auburnwa.gov" <wosborne@auburnwa.gov> Subject: Support Vietnamese American War Memorial Reply -To: Xuan Nguyen <xnguven2011 @yahoo.com> Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of the City of Auburn, Please support the joint Vietnamese American War Memorial. Thank you, Xuan N. Nguyen 1 RES.G Page 264 of 465 Antoinette. Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 7:57 AM To: Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Vietnamese American War memorial Please have these added to the record with Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Tien Ha <tien.hanhact.bizv Date: August 14, 2013, 7:47:01 AM PDT To: < nbackus@, auburnwa .gov >,. <jholman @auburnwa.gov >, <wosborne(a�auburnwa.gov >, <ipartridge @auburnwa.gov >, <rwagner@auburnwa.gov >, <lwales @auburnwa.gov >, <bpelozaaaubumwa.gov >, <Plewis@auburnwa.gov> Subject: Vietnamese American War memorial Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial. Thank you. TIEN HA 1 RES.G Page 265 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Rick Waling jrjwp78 @yahoo.coml Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:35 PM Pete Lewis Subject: Joint Vietnam Memorial I am a Vietnam Veteran and I want to put in my thoughts as to why this memo rial should be approved. I was an Army medic in Central and. Northern Thailand from February 1969- June 1970: I worked on military forces from several countries including the South Vietnamese Special Forces. Every one was treated equally without regard to where they were from. I never heard a bad thing about the South Vietnamese troops from anyone that worked with and beside them. They were fierce and loyal to the man and did their duty proudly. They.interdieted with our Special Forces, CIA, and troops form other countries. They bled the same as our rneri, died " as our men died and from what I heard from others, fought as hard as anyone. We abandoned these people because of politics. It is now time for politics to give back to these people who have suffered at our governments hand. They could have a country if our country hadn't given up on them. Now they call America their country. Let's support this project. Sincerely, Richard J. Waling, D.C. 1 RES.G Page 266 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Ghi Dang [dang4498148 @yahoo.coml Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2013 12:01 AM To: Pete Lewis; Bill Peloza; Largo Wales; Rich Wagner; John Partridge; Wayne Osborne; John Holman; Nancy Backus Cc: Duy D Nguyen; Duyen TrAn; Chuyen Nguyen; Hoang Nguyen; Khanh Le; Khanh Thanh Nguyen; G Dang Subject: Re: American Vietnamese Memoria To: The City of Auburn My name is Ghi Dang and I am a former Captain. I served in ground combat in Vietnam with the 22 Infantry Division of the South Viet Nam Army, I was two times became a prisoner of war (POW) (1972 - 1973 was held in jungle) + (1975 - 1983 in the concentration camps). I and my wife with three children leave for US to resettle our life by accepted us as the refugee circumstance. My reason for contacting you is to tell you just how hard the South Vietnamese Army fought alongside of the US military and shedding their blood just as we did in combat and air assaults, their sacrifice of many South V.N Troops and wounded well fighting alongside of the US troops was outstanding and with devotion to the U.S Military.: Those Vietnamese Troops who did manage to come to America and become US Citizens and a part of this Country fought hard very hard to do so, and now to turn backs on us would be a terrific mistake . when we ask for just a little to Honor our fallen heroes and U.S's heroes as well, as it was in battle in Vietnam. Being a ground Combat infantryman I fought side by side with the United States Army, without US Troops our South V.N were occupied by North Vietnamese Communist long time before South Viet Nam fall on the date April 30, 1975. Now you will get some American Vietnam Veterans who will disapprove of any honor given to the American/ Vietnamese Citizens; that is their right, I believe it's time to Honor all who fought for Americas freedom in Vietnam, I ask that you consider in favor of this proposal, for what the Vietnamese American ask for is :so small for such a large value of return; in the way of Honor to all who fought in Vietnam with US Troops. Thank you for your time. Ghi Dang - former Captain 22 infantry Division of Republic of South V.N www. facebook.comlghi. dang 1 RES.G Page 267 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Dan Heid Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:54 PM To: Pete Lewis Cc: John Holman Subject: Joint Vietnam Memorial Mayor. Per your invitation to e-mail you to let you know my thoughts — our thoughts — regarding support for (or opposition to) the proposed Joint Vietnam Memorial — I wish to send my thoughts to you. First of all,, I want you to know that I am not writing this as the Auburn City Attorney, but as a citizen of the Auburn Community (I may not live within the city limits - I live just outside the city limits — but I have an Auburn address and '1 consider Auburn to be my town). Also, I am writing this as a Vietnam Veteran. I am including with this submittal a couple of e-mails l previously exchanged with Auburn VFW Post Commander Frank Banister — most current on top — oldest below. I do not feel I should repeat what I already said, though if you have any questions of me, please let me know. Also, I am sending this to you and Councilmember Holman — as both of you attended the dinner /celebration on August 11th. But if you would find it helpful or worthwhile to send this to the other Councilmembers, 1 would welcome your doing so. A few, of the veterans who spoke up at the August 11th dinner /celebration talked about Post Traumatic atic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Though I was in combat and I had some rough times while serving in. Vietnam (being engaged in combat firefights,1 losing buddies, fearing that I will not get out of the present predicament alive and having someone die in my arms — I'd consider these signs of a rough time], I do not have [I do not believe 1 have] PTSD. However, 1 believe that the incidents of PTSD were dramatically increased in Vietnam over the levels experienced from World War 11. and the Korean War. No one can convince me that the traumas of war were any Tess severe in World War 11 or the Korean War than they were in Vietnam. What was the difference? 1 can only think of two differences; more illegal drug use,' and lack of support for those fighting overseas by the folks back home. Also, when 1 returned from overseas, in route to (U.S.M.C. Base) Camp Pendleton, the base from which I was discharged, I was bussed from (I believe) Travis Air Force Base to San Francisco International Airport to catch my flight south. However, once there, I was greeted, as were the other marines and servicemen with whom I was travelling, by hippies with signs that said things like "End the War" and "Bring Our Boys Home, sentiments that were belied by the loud shouts from these same hippies of "Murders," "War Mongers" and "Baby Killers." Not much of a welcome home! I know first hand how depressing it is to be in combat and facing all that goes with that, all the while knowing that the American Society was not supportive of what we were doing — what we were trying to do to help the people of South Vietnam. I would receive copies of the newspaper from my home town (two weeks late as they were sent via ship), only to read of college campuses dosing down to protest the war in Vietnam, of anti -war protests taking place in cities and towns across the Country, of newscasters, politicians and Hollywood celebrities bashing the war in Vietnam. From my perspective - from what we saw from back home — that portrayed a lack of support for us — for what we were trying to do. Every member of my Recon Team, and everyone in my Platoon and my Company (I'm sure the whole Battalion), wished we were fighting a war of which the folks back home were supportive. Since we were not getting much support back home for our war efforts, where did we get any support? From our buddies, and from the people of South Vietnam. It may sound strange to say this, but even in war, in Vietnam I had — we had — some good times, though we also had some very tough times. I lost some buddies and saw some of them seriously injured. But 1 am glad that I had the opportunity to serve in Vietnam with the Marines of Recon. They were great guys. Also, one of the most rewarding things I was able to do while in Vietnam was to go on "Med- Caps," where we — a few marines and a couple corpsmen — would go out into the rural villages and provide medical help to the villagers, most (if not all) of whom probably never saw a doctor in their life. Also, when we were in the rear, between patrols, we could occasionally talk to South Vietnamese citizens — those with whom we could communicate, they with their Pigeon English and us with our Pigeon Vietnamese. They were glad we were there, they wanted us to be there and.appreciated our help. It is for reasons like these — the chances to visit with people of South Vietnam and the opportunities to go out on Med- Caps — that l am glad 1 had the opportunity to serve in Vietnam. 1 RES.G Page 268 of 465 But for those who may not have had even these sources of appreciation, I can only think that serving in a war — combat setting — facing the dangers that go with it, without feeling the support and encouragement of the folks back home (and rather sensing a hostile anger toward the war), that can only leave .a person discouraged and depressed, and less able to cope with the burdens of war. I am glad that the military personnel who served in World War 11, in the Korean War and in the wars in the Middle East, did not have to contend with the hostile rejection of their efforts ray the American Society. However, I believe that what we were trying to do, though not supported by the news media, academia,. politicians, Hollywood and too much of American Society, was the right thing to do. This brings me to the Joint Vietnamese Memorial. If we cannot recognize the good folks of South Vietnam, on whose behalf we fought and sacrifices, or worse yet, if we hold grudges against them, that is a continuation of the sorry sentiment too often expressed by American Society in the late 1960's and early 1970's, essentially saying that we should not have been there, that our sacrifices were meaningless and our efforts were a waste of time, resources and personnel. If for no other reason than to convey the message that the efforts and sacrifices of those who served and fought in Vietnam — trying to help the people of South Vietnam — are valuable and deserving of recognition, the Memorial should be built. 1. As a Navy Field Combat Corpsman [Medic] with the First Reconnaissance Battalion, Fleet Marine. Force [USMC], I was one of a six -man team inserted deep behind enemy lines, to track and report enemy movements. At least 50% of our missions ended in a firelight as one's reconnaissance ability ends when the enemy knows where you are. 2. I was able to resist the temptation to use illegal drugs while in Vietnam, but its use — the use of marijuana and heroine in particular — was so common, it was hard to not notice. But not all who suffer PTSD used such drugs, and thus I believe that the use of such drugs was an attempt by some to cope with a depressing situation. Those who were not there — or not in that situation — malt not be able to appreciate how depressing it would be to have your life on the line — being in combat, facing recurrent danger, losing buddies — in a war that is not supported — that is opposed — back home. 3. I have heard that there are those who claim that such incidents did not happen, but I know what I saw and heard, and I cannot — will not — ever forget that, as I'm sure the other returning servicemen will not. Moreover, such receptions most have occurred (at least at that location) more than just on the day I returned, as an the bus heading to the airport, the military warned us about this occurring, and cautioned us to not (over) react. It was hard not to react, but impossible to forget. Thank you. Dan Daniel B. Held Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheid @aubumwa.gov The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. From: Dan Heid Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 2:24 PM To: 'Francis Bannister' Cc: Pete Lewis Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam Memorial Frank: RES.G 2 Page 269 of 465 Thank you for your comments. But I feel that the attitude toward the Vietnam War is related to the People of South Vietnam. If we do not support the people on whose behalf we were there, how can we value the fact that we were there in the first place? Please know that this is something about which I feel strongly. The reason I feel the way I do is because I believe (I truly do believe) that what the U.S. was initially trying to do in South Vietnam was the right thing to do — supporting a nation with which we were allied. Maybe we did not have to join with the South Vietnamese in their "civil war" — or perhaps more correctly, their "war to separate themselves from the North," but we did, and our government sent troops in to help them. Once we did that, we owed it to our troops to support their mission and to try to succeed in their efforts — rather than just having the number of troops being sent over there increase, and with a recurring practice of "advance then pull- back," seeing the number of dead and injured troops mount. 1 believe that the folks who sent us over there in the first place — those who passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution — our representatives in Congress — had no gumption or will to succeed once opposition to the war surfaces back home. With the marked increase of anti -war protests, and anti -war celebrities, Congress was impotent or unwilling to do anything to support the troops. That was how I saw things when l was overseas. Every member of my Recon Team and the other teams in my Company wished "why couldn't we be fighting in a war like World War 11, where the people back home were supportive of what we were trying to do." Added to that [and I will argue with anyone who says differently on this], most of the people of South Viet Nam wanted us there and wanted our help. That is what they there telling us and that is consistent with what we all saw after the U.S. Left — left South Vietnam in a lurch — with the almost immediate fall of South Vietnam, and that is what we saw with the desperation of the boat people. The folks who were saying at the time [incorrectly from my perspective] that "the South Vietnamese didn't want us there" were saying that because that supports their argument that we should not be there, that we should end the war, that.it was not a deserving war, etc. The message was that it was wrong for us to be there. Bluntly, the commentary that now indicates opposition to the South Vietnamese, especially that which is hostile' and sometimes laced with unfortunate vulgarity and profanity, to me re- states the same sentiments — that the South Vietnamese didn't want us there, that we should not have been there, that Vietnam was not a deserving war, and that it was wrong for us to be there. Rather than that being a healthy dialogue, to me, it goes counter to the long and challenging efforts — positive and valuable efforts — of our society to correct the wrongful approach too often taken toward the troops retuming from Vietnam. To me, recognizing that we were there to help the people of South Vietnam validates our actions and our service. Disparaging the reason we were there — to help the people of South Vietnam — invalidates our actions and devalues our service. When these negative sentiments are coming from folks who served in Vietnam, 1 have to ask: Do they feel that we- they - should not have been there? Do they feel that this was an undeserving war? Do they feel that serving in Vietnam is something that is disgraceful and something about which they should be ashamed? I recognize that such sentiments exist — they certainly do by those belonging to the "Veterans for Peace." But if these sentiments belong to members of the VFW, I am confused. I understand that the mission and vision of the VFW is to foster camaraderie among U.S. veterans of overseas conflicts; to advocate on behalf of all veterans, and to ensure that veterans are respected for their service, and are recognized for the sacrifices they have made on behalf of this great country. Rather than seeing the rejection of South Vietnamese [and even the rejection of the recent VFW motion] as a healing measure, I submit it is a revival of the negative sentiments voices so often forty -plus years ago. And when it comes from members of the VFW, I feel it is all the more troubling — coming from a source that should support the folks who served in Vietnam, and recognize and value their service, not adding to the criticism of their efforts or the value of their service. I understand that Mike Sepal brought this point up, but there is (no longer) a South Vietnam, different than any other war with which the United States has ever been involved. I am confident that there are memorials in other countries related to U.S. help in war — e.g., The Manila American Cemetery and Memorial in the Philippines, The Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial in France and The U.S. Korean War Memorial in Busan, South Korea, to name just a few. There is no such memorial in Vietnam. There are not even any war memorials that recognize any combatants in Vietnam other than those who fought for North Vietnam. But even this is a different topic, though it is my answer as to why we needn't necessarily open the door for other memorials (not, mind you, something that I would find objectionable). 3 RES.G Page 270 of 465 Also, for what it is worth, I do not believe the fact that Olympia rejected a proposed memorial as a reason for Auburn to do so. Olympia is quite a different community from Aubum. Between the two, I am glad I am in Auburn. I know 1 went on for a while, but I'd like to talk to you about this sometime if we have the chance. Thanks. Dan Daniel B. Heid Aubum City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheid @auburnwa.gov The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. TO THE BELOW, I RESPONDED AS ABOVE: From: Francis Bannister [ mailto :francisbannister @hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:33 AM To: Dan Heid Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam Memorial Dan I have to tell you I really enjoyed your comments about the Vietnam War. Actually you said it all, its not about the Vietnamese people that our members are objecting too, its the war and all the consequences for American Veterans. Some can get past it like yourself and open thier hearts up to allied vets, some cannot, that is the dilemma that can divide the city. I think building it on private property can be a win -win for the city. Those vets that cannot make the leap you did can still come to Memorial Park without triggering feelings that might be harmful to our Vietnamese citizens and former allies. They will also avoid the perception that their government abandoned them once again. In a private setting those who have made the transition and fully forgave the war /Country can visit and serve as an example and point of light for others, our Vietnamese alliance can also have a place they can call home and share their healing spirit with those who need it. Once again Dan, thanks for your courageous and meaningful comments, thanks for all you do for our post and its vets, I look forward to working with you to make our post a point of Tight for the City of Auburn. Respectfully, Frank A MOTION WAS MADE TO SUPPORT THE JOINT VIETNAM MEMORIAL AT THE JUNE MEETING OF THE AUBURN VFW POST. FOLLOWING A LENGTHY DISCUSSION, THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED - NOT APPROVED. UNFORTUNATELY, I WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE, AS I WOULD HAVE SPOKEN IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. AT THE JULY VFW POST MEETING, THE ISSUE WAS AGAIN BROUGHT UP AS A DISCUSSION ITEM. A NUMBER OF PEOPLE SPOKE, AS DID I — AT THIS MEETING. THOUGH NO MOTION WAS MADE, I WOULD. SUBMIT THAT THE SENTIMENTS SEEMED MORE SUPPORTIVE OF THE ISSUE. 4 RES.G Page 271 of 465 FOLLOWING THE MEETING POST COMMANDER FRANK BANNISTER THANKED ME FOR MY COMMENTS — ABOVE. From: Dan Heid Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33 AM To: 'Francis Bannister': 'sepalmj @aol.com; Auburn VFW Post Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam Memorial Frank: This is a follow -up to our recent conversation regarding the proposed Vietnam Veterans Memorial being considered for the City of Aubum. You indicated that you wanted feedback — wanted to know what the members of the Aubum VFW Post thought about a proposed Vietnam Veteran's Memorial that jointly recognized U.S. military troops and those of the military of South Vietnam, and what the thoughts are of Post members regarding whether this Memorial ought to recognize the South Vietnamese military veterans along with U.S. military veterans. Here are my thoughts: As you know, 1 had the opportunity to serve with the U.S. Marine Corps in Vietnam. I was a Navy Field Combat Corpsman assigned to 1st Reconnaissance Battalion out of Da Nang — not too far from the 17th parallel, between North and South Vietnam. The Marines of Region, especially those of my team — Road Test, Were the greatest group of guys I'd ever expect to have served with — Marines alongside whom I had the greatest honor of serving. In our patrol missions, we would penetrate deep behind enemy lines to watch for enemy troop movements, and at least half of our patrols ended with a firelight [when the enemy is shooting at you, your reconnaissance potential is severely curtailed]. As a Corpsman (a Navy Medic), I went out on patrols, carried an M -16 and my pack, and did everything my Marine teammates did, though when in a firelight, my first priority was to attend to those who were injured or in need of medical help. [As an aside, I never saw any atrocities as depicted in the movies. For that matter, once my buddies were all accounted for and okay, I would try to aid wounded enemy combatants — the folks who minutes before were shooting at us. This may seem counter- intuitive, but we — my team — looked at it this way: if bunging back a wounded, but living, enemy soldier could help shorten the war, it was worth our doing, and besides, it was the right thing to do.] But when in the rear, in between patrols, I had the opportunity to talk to citizens of South Vietnam with my pigeon - Vietnamese and their pigeon - English [I must confess, theirs was better than mine]. Those with whom I spoke were glad we were there. I also had the occasional opportunity to meet up with military units of South Vietnam. In fact I recall on one instance when our team's patrol was extended -- the time out in the jungle was lengthened beyond what was initially planned to be. We here we were flat out of food, and we were directed to the camp of a South Vietnamese Popular Forces unit (an allied militia unit) which was not too far away. They willingly, graciously shared their food with us. It still amazes me to think how delicious a simple meal of fish and rice tastes when one is really hungry. If there is opposition to the joint recognition proposal, as may be inferred by the question you asked, I do not know the basis for that opposition. I do not believe that a joint recognition would detracts from honoring U.S. Vietnam Veterans. Rather, I believe it may help put things in perspective. I also do not know what hams would stem from including in merndrial recognition of the soldiers and militia of South Vietnam, citizens of Vietnam, the people on whose behalf we were engaged in the conflict of the Vietnam War, but from my perspective, those on whose behalf we were acting were appreciative of our presence. I know from reading the history of Vietnam that in the early 1950's, when Ho Chi Minh sought to expel the French from Vietnam (part of French Indochina), he aligned his anti - French forces with the Communist Chinese and Russians. When he did so, many hundreds of thousands of people who resided in the northern portion of the country fled Hanoi and the north, going to the south. That significantly increased the population of folks in the southern part of Vietnam who did not want to be governed by a communist controlled government, and the result of that exodus was to divide the country into what later became North and South Vietnam. You may recall as well from history that in response to the Civil War that followed between the divided Vietnam, a conflict that eventually drew the United States into the fray, the United Nations endeavored to resolve the conflict between the North and the South. The United Nations sought to impose a ten -year cease -fire, (temporarily) drawing a line at the 17th parallel, dividing North from South. Along with that, the U.N. scheduled a reconciliation vote to be held in 10 years. However, as the year 1964 (the end of the ten -year RES.G Page 272 of 465 period) approached, opposition to holding the unifying election grew among many people in the South who did not want to be a part of a communist nation. Their thinking was that with the past ten years of independent, autonomous existence, the government of South Vietnam was sufficiently established and separate from North Viet Nam, so that the election was not called for. That opposition to the election, in turn, aggravated the fragile cease-fire, and civil war hostilities started to increase. This, in turn, prompted increased intervention by the United States military. (This is not by any means a complete history of everything that prompted U.S. involvement in Vietnam, but for the purposes of explaining my sentiments /response to your question, I believe it is sufficient.) I know that there were some people in South Vietnam who were opposed to the anti- communist government, and it may be that there were problems with the South Vietnamese government, like there may be with many, if not most, governments. We all may recall the vivid images of Buddhist monks who set themselves on fire to protest the (largely Christian supported) govemment of South Vietnam. But I submit, the Buddhists were not sportive of communist North Vietnam as much as they were opposed to the Christian controlled govemment of South Vietnam. A testimony to that is that once the Americans left Vietnam and the government of South Vietnam fell, no one suffered more at the hands of the (now) communist govemment of Vietnam-than the Buddhists. From my perspective, they were expecting to be left alone by the communist government of Vietnam, perhaps in exchange for their opposition the government of South Vietnam. But that was not what the atheistic, communist government had in mind, once -in control. And once in control, the communist government removed the right and opportunity for the people to select their rulers, which at least existed to some extent prior to the fall of the South Vietnam government. As I see it, before the government of South Vietnam fell, South Vietnam had a population which included many who were clearly more aligned with the United States and who had .a desire -not to be governed by a communist-controlled regime. There were, again, Buddhists who were opposed to the Christian population and likewise opposed to a government (an elected govemment) largely comprised of the Christian population. There were also, of course, those less - politically motivated folks who were more concerned about their next bowl of rice than the political persuasions of their neighbors. However, even twenty years after their exodus in the early 1950's, anti - communist sentiments continued among many of those who left the north to escape communism. Those who did not want to be under communist domination were the people who wanted us there; they were the people who wanted our help to avoid that. From my-perspective, many people in the United States, including members of the television news media, politicians in Washington D.C., protesters on college campuses, hippies at the San Francisco international Airport, and Hollywood celebrities like Jane Fonda, missed the fact (or refused to believe) that these people did not want to be communists and that they wanted us there to help them. Their opposition to a communist controlled government would have been obvious to anyone who would look at things objectively. For that matter, it has been estimated that 65,000 Vietnamese were executed after the end of the war, with one million being sent to prison /re- education camps where an estimated additional 165,000 died. But their opposition would have been most clearly evident when one considers that many citizens of South Vietnam took the absolutely desperate measure of getting into overcrowded vessels of questionable seaworthiness, leaving everybody and everything else behind, not knowing where they would end up or even whether they would end up someplace, in an effort to leave after the fall of South Vietnam. Unfortunately, many such efforts ended in tragedy. The United Nations estimates that hundreds of thousands of people seeking to escape communist Vietnam perished because of these efforts. Anybody who disputes this description, and their desperation, should talk to one of these "Vietnamese boat people" many of whom eventually made it to this Country (the United States is reported 'to have accepted over 800,000 of these refugees). It is with anguish that l think how tragically America failed the people of South Vietnam. They were not failed not by the military troops who were trying to help them, but by the politicians who vacillated in direction and resolve regarding the "conflict" and by those in the media and in Hollywood, and others, who sabotaged the morale of the. American troops, troops who were trying to do a task that became impossible because it was unpopular and unsupported back home. To answer your question, I would support a Vietnam Veterans Memorial that recognizes our partners in the conflict in Southeast Asia and that recognizes the people who wanted us to be there. Recognizing the people on whose behalf we were acting helps show the legitimacy of our 6 RES.G Page 273 of 465 having been there. Ignoring them draws into question the purpose for our being over there. They deserve our support; they deserved it then and deserve it now. 1 am sending this to the entire VFW email list so that: (1) others know what I think - making my position known — and (2) if there are others who may have thoughts in these regards, they may also wish to weigh in on your question. Thank you. Dan Heid Daniel B. Heid Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheid @auburnwa.gov The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. 7 RES.G Page 274 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Thom [stoddertwork @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August. 12, 2013 12:17 PM To: John Holman; Pete Lewis Subject: Why the Joint American- Vietnames Memorial needs to be supported Dear Mr. Holman and Mayor Lewis, I am writing you to ask for your support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial. The reasons are too many to put in to a simple letter. It was started by a Vietnamese Woman in appreciation for American -born veterans who served in her country. The idea continued with Mayor Lewis to place the monument in Auburn, a special place for veterans and veteran projects. The monument is intended to recognize the sacrifices and experiences of women, who are the least recognized during events like this. Thus there is a woman/nurse depicted. It goes further in that it acknowledges the experiences of medical personnel, who were always bystanders to the carnage and were tasked to care for those who survived. There is little to no recognition for them. I know this is true as I was a medic during Desert Storm. The monument is to provide a place for members of our community and our allies within the veteran community to remember and mourn lost loved ones and former comrades. Those would include those who survived and didn't. Imagine that Mt. Tahoma National Cemetery or any cemetery that contained your loved ones being bulldozed for out of spite and where your loved one's final resting place has been paved over. That is how it is for us American -born and the Vietnamese community. A monument like this is a very difficult issue to face because of the painful memories, usually not dealt with in a healthy manner. Projects like this have always faced resistance. In 1986 Sarah Blum and a Vietnamese woman, also a nurse, started a project to bring veterans together in Seattle — they were physically threatened. In the end it was brilliant success. Every Vietnam veteran I ever spoken to said they could not face "The Wall" in DC or were left in tears. Now this is the most visited site in the Washington Mall. This is true for the projects in California,'Texas, and Kansas. The Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial is intended to bring added value in coming years to City of Auburn and the veteran community with projects to teach; enhance the quality of life in Auburn, and even add to commerce through tourism. However, its projected intentions for the next few years. are - to tell the story of the cost of Freedom- Democracy -Self Determination. 1 RES.G Page 275 of 465 The red and yellow flag of South Vietnam, that is intended to fly over the statues represent to the Vietnamese, their community, their heritage, and their lost homeland.. It represents Freedom - Democracy. For most American -born veterans the flag represents what we gave and lost.. The yellow and red ribbon I wore during the 23 years in the Army still means the most to me, more that the Bronze Star, the Air Medal, or the Meritorious Service Medal (the highest peace time award). Vehicles up and down Interstate — 5 have red and yellow bumper stickers, more so than any other displayed. Even though there is a small minority of ill- informed people opposing, we still receive notices of support all over the Puget Sound region and from other States who are watching us. We invite all people to work together for an effort of teaching and healing, just as the Traveling Vietnam Memorial Wall does where ever it goes. Thank you. Thom Stoddert, US Army ret. Co -Chair of the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance\ 360 - 239 -1925. — A36Berlin @,gmail.com 2 RES.G Page 276 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Atkinson, Joseph [Joseph.Atkinson @leg.wa.gov] on behalf of Kochmar, Rep. Linda [Linda.Kochmar @leg.wa.gov] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:17 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: Auburn Veteran's Memorial Honorable Mayor Pete Lewis, The purpose of this email is to strongly affirm my full support of the proposed Vietnam veteran's memorial in Auburn as both a state legislator, and as the widow of a veteran who served our country honorably. Many veterans and their families have called this area home for some .time, and it is imperative that we give them our full respect and appreciation. Many families in our area have been touched by the bravery and sacrifice of our solders. On a personal level, my twin brother whom I loved dearly served in Vietnam and later died of his injuries. My deceased husband David also served in Vietnam as a pilot, and made great sacrifices for his country. It is critical to me that we honor our loved ones and fallen solders who courageously served our country, and paid the ultimate price. Such a memorial in Auburn is very appropriate for our area, where many Vietnam veterans and their families have settled and call home. I urge your support, and offer my assistance in any way I can. Sincerely, State Representative • 30th Legislative District Legislative Building • 122F • Olympia, WA 98504 (Phone: 360-786-7898 • ) Toll -Free Hotline: 1-800-562-6000 l 1 RES.G Page 277 of 465 -Click Here- To sign up for Representative Kochmar's Email Updates 2 RES.G Page 278 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Lan Phan Jones [ americanvietnamesealliance ©gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11:43 AM To: Nancy Backus; John Holman; Wayne Osborne; Bill Peloza; Largo Wales; Rich Wagner Cc: Pete Lewis; Thomas Stoddert Subject: Vietnam Veterans' Memorial I am writing on behalf of the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance to ask for your support for the proposed memorial for Veitnam War veterans in Auburn's Veterans' Memorial Park. The Alliance is a non - profit, charitable organization formed to honor Vietnam War soldiers including South Vietnamese and allied soldiers who fought with Americans. We also strive to educate citizens about the history of the war and preserve the memory of those gave their lives in that struggle. We are not a polical organization. We are seeking 501(c)(3) status as a charitable organization, which limits political activity. However, we need the Auburn City Council's support to fullfill our mission. The Vietnam War stirs deep emotions. Many Vietnam veterans still suffer from post tramatic stress disorder (PTSD), often un- diagnosed and/or un- treated. Many will go to their graves with deep emotional scars and unresolved traumas. Others, as they approach their final years, struggle to find peace within themselves, These veterans need to hear that their sacrifices are understood and honored by their families and the community. They need a time and place to remember, grieve, and find peace. That is what this memorial is about. Bringing together the American and Vietnamese veterans is a powerful healing experience for veterans seeking spiritual peace. American veterans are surprised to learn they are honored as heros by the Vietnamese refugee community: They feel their loss less keenly when they understand the tragic loss and suffering of the South Vietnamese soldiers left behind when American withdrew from the war. The South Vietnamese veterans, now living as refugees in this country, long to be accepted and understood in this country. Often their. limited English isolates them. Coming together with American veterans who honor their struggle restores their pride. They do not have many words; but they have a flag. When that flag is displayed and honored no words are needed to fill their hearts with pride and to make them feel understood. Last night; about 100 Vietnam Veterans and their families attended a Vietnam Veterans Appreciation Dinner at Holy Family. Parish. Most were American veterans or Auburn residents. Councilman Holman and Mayor Lewis were there: If you had been there and heard the veteran's stories you would understand what the Alliance is all - about and what the joint memorial can do for the community of Auburn. By supporting the proposed joint memorial in Auburn, you support healing veterans and unifying the community.. You also educate the public about the history of this nation's sruggle for human rights and democracy,and the price of the freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Respectfully asking for your support for the memorial, Lan Phan Jones Co- President, American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance RES.G 1 Page 279 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Michael Howard [jcnmike ©hotmail.com] Sent Monday, August 12, 2013 10:09 AM To: Pete Lewis; Thom Stoddert; ahjones@comcast.net; Ron Holz; Rick.Bulman; Pam Peabody Subject: Vietnam Memorial Mayor Lewis, My name is Michael Howard and I served with the 2/8 Mechanized Infantry 4th Infantry Division in and near Pleiku, Vietnam in 1968 and 1969. I was wounded in combat July 1 1968 and received a Purple Heart for those wounds. .I left some of my flesh and a lot of my blood in Vietnam. I'm blessed to even be here.. I have a friend born and raised in Auburn that lost his brother in Vietnam and I believe his daughters life ended due to the effects of Agent Orange (Dixon). We have a Veteran's Administration to help us Vet's with our physical and mental (unseen) wounds from that conflict. We lost 58,000 plus in the war, at last I heard we lost 170,000 Vietnam Vet's to suicide. There are uncountable Vietnam Vet's that are dying or adversely effected from Agent Orange. We have a saying "We all died in Vietnam, some of us just have not fallen over yet ". This brings me to our brothers in arms the ARVN's Army of the Republic of South Vietnam. They don't have a Veterans Administration, they don't have the support or recognition that we American Soldier got be it years later. I will speak for Myself here, although many Vietnam Vet's would agree with me, I believe the politican's prevented the United States Armed Forces from completing the job we were sent to Vietnam to do. Please understand that I realize and understand that politicians have a job to do and that was then this is now. Our Vietnamese brothers were abandoned in 1975 and left to face the horror of being over run and captured by the very regime we American's were sent to destroy, so South Vietnam could live in peace and a democracy. I have the upmost respect for the City of Auburn!!!! Your forward thinking provides the largest Veterans Parade this side of the Mississippi. It was in this Parade that I received the recognition for my service to my country for the second time since I came home in 1970. The first was at my church. You have no idea the healing power your City provides for all veterans of all wars.. To march in that Parade, with my fellow Vietnamese, Laotian brothers provides healing and closure from the many years of pain and suffering I have gone through since Vietnam. You and your City have the opportunity to right a wrong that has plagued our fellow Vietnamese veterans and their families for years. I served on a committee with Vietnamese and American Veterans that tried to get a memorial to the Vietnamese at the State Capitol. Plans had been submitted, drawing and placement of the Memorial were in place, the Senate and House had approved the memorial almost half of the funds were raised to implement this Memorial. It is my understanding that one or two people opposed this Memorial an it did not happen. Again my Vietnamese brothers and sisters were denied their due. The people of Auburn have the opportunity to reverse this pattern of rejection. I pray that you will move forward and give the Vietnamese People the recognition they rightly deserve by giving them this honor, which for so many years has been denied. A second generation Vietnamese woman and her family have strived so hard to have a place to take their children and say "Look this is to commemorate the valor of your fore fathers ". As one of the speakers at the dinner last evening stated " There are Memorials through out many countries in honor of the American soldier, for their action and valor in armed conflicts ". Do our Vietnamese soldiers and their families deserve any less? I will mention areas where I serve the community but first and foremost I am a Vietnam Veteran.. Sincerely, Michael L Howard Chaplin Western Chapter 4th Infantry Association Tacoma Outpost Leader Pointman Ministries International Mentor for The Pierce County Veterans Drug Court Volunteer For the Washington Department of Correction 1 RES.G Page 280 of 465 Pete Lewis From David Schmidt [1 stsargeantdl ©comaast.net] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 9:58 AM To: Pete Lewis Subject Re: Veterans Dear Mayor Lewis. The privilege is mine to be able to speak from my heart to all of you at the Auburn City council meeting. Although it was difficult and truly took a lot of me to share my ongoing pain due to100% PTSD disability, I`m glad I maintained my courage and dignity to have done it! I wish I can do more than just to speak about the importance of building the memorial not only to the Vietnamese community but to people like me who served hand in hand with them during the Vietnam War. I fervently hope and pray that the decision of the Auburn City Council will be geared towards what is right for all of the Vietnamse- American veterans rather than of political. Thank you for your service as well and all of what you for the common good! Semper Fidelis! David L Schniidtt, USMC 1st Sergeant, Retired 253 735 1653 Sent from my iPad On Aug 6, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Pete Lewis <plewis @.auburnwa.gov> wrote: Thank you for your comments last night. I very much appreciated it Connect with me on Facebook The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. RES.G 1 Page 281 of 465 Pete Lewis From:. Steve Konek Sr. (ski k47@hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 6:15 AM To: Pete Lewis; John Holman; Wayne Osborn e; John Partridge; Rich Wagner; Largo Wales; Bill Peloza; Nancy Backus Subject: Proposed AlliedNietnam Memorial Attachments: Auburn Monument Letter.pdf Mayor Peter Lewis & Honorable Members of the Auburn City Council, We have attached our previous letter and reiterate our support of the proposed monument honoring the allied soldiers who served in the Vietnam War. The loss to the Vietnam homeland is the United States' gain. This great nation received an influx of refugees from that conflict, most of whom have become hard working, productive citizens. Although the war was controversial in the United States and continues to be so; although some look at the Vietnamese themselves as the place to lay the blame; it is the long over due time to put that aside. The monument proposed for Auburn is one means to do that. It will provide a place to honor all of the allied soldiers who came together for the cause of democracy and will provide a place of healing. Freedom is not easily paid for and we recognize that there are conflicting views of this monument. The City of Auburn has an opportunity to do what the communist government will not do in Vietnam, to recognize all veterans of the conflict. To citizens of the Northwest, Auburn is a leader in demonstrating appreciation of our veterans, our allies, and the diversity that comprises the United States. This is another opportunity to do so. Chapter XVI, 173d Airborne Brigade Association, heartedly encourages you to support and approve this proposed monument. Thank you for your time, service, and consideration of this issue. Chris Clewell President, Chapter XVI RES.G Page 282 of 465 Pete Lewis From: hoghero@comcast.net Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 11:38 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: Joint American - Vietnamese Memorial I, Soni Dolge, a Viet. Nam vet 66 -67 / 68 -69, also a Combat Veterans Motorcycle Assoc. member, am very much for the proposed monument being put in the Auburn Veterans Park. It will be a healing tool for both ethnic groups of military Warriors. Thank you Mayor Pete for a job well done. and WELCOME HOME... FREEDOM IS NOT FREE 1 RES.G Page 283 of 465 Pete Lewis From: trinhl 1 @juno.com Sent:. Sunday, August 11,2013'11:35 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: Support build a Monument for American and.Vietnamese War Memorial Dear Mayor, After the dinner tonight,. I would like to Support the American and Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Monument.The Monument will honor not only American veterans of the Vietnam War but also acknowledge and remember the sacrifices South. Vietnamese soldiers made fighting alongside their allies. Trinh Nguyen Spouse of former South Vietnamese Air Force Officer RES.G Page 284 of 465 Pete Lewis From: chien dang [cddang2003 ©yahoo.com] Sent:. Sunday, August 11, 2013 11:17 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: Support the American- Vietnamese war memorial monument. Dear Mayor. I would like to support the American and Vietnamese War Memorial monument. will built in City Auburn Washington in the future. Thank you so much for your support. Chien Dang Former South Vietnamese Airforce Officer. 1 RES.G Page 285 of 465 Pete Lewis. From: ky nguyen [kykimnguyen9661 @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 10:05 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: petition for American Vietnammese War Alliance Project Dear MR. LEWIS, Mayor of Auburn city and all of the Auburn city Council Board. I 'm NGUYEN, KY HUU who is a citizen of the United States, a Vietnamese soldier in the Vietnam War. My family and I and some hundreds of thousand others loss the homeland after April 30th 1975. It had have been terrible time in the Vietnamese communism(VC) prison that has been called "Re Education Camp" I always remembered, respectfully 58,000 US soldiers who loss their lives for freedom and democracy for Vietnam and the world. For that, I would like to ask you and The City Council Board to please help us to approve the project which will be built for the American Vietnamese War Alliance in Auburn city. Thank you for your time! God bless you all, God bless America, We will stand strong forever. Sincerely, Ky Huu Nguyen 1 RES.G Page 286 of 465 Pete Lewis From: Sarah Blum [nursescribe ©q.com] Sent: Sunday, August 11, 2013 8:44 PM To: Pete Lewis Subject: Vietnam Veteran Vietnamese Memorial Thank you so much for your service to our country and our city and for all that you shared at the Vietnam Veteran Appreciation Dinner tonight. It:is important to honor our Vietnamese citizens and soldiers who fought beside us during the Vietnam War to bring freedom to the people of South Vietnam. I believe the memorial will serve not only our local community of veterans and Vietnamese veterans but those in our state and beyond. I doubt there are any other joint memorials like the one proposed for Auburn. 1 am a nurse Vietnam Veteran and on Veterans Day in 1985, along with Thu Van Nugyen A Vietnamese hospital worker, we brought Vietnam veterans together with Vietnamese veterans for the first time at Recognition/Friendship Day. It was a day of healing for everyone present. From that day on Vietnam Veterans marched with our Vietnamese counterparts in the Regional Veterans Day Parade. Now let us take it a step further and create a permanent memorial for the recognition of our partnership and friendship, during and since the war. Respectfully, Sarah L. Blum ARNP Nurse Psychotherapist in Auburn, WA Nurse Vietnam Veteran Author: Women Under Fire: Abuse in the Military Women Under Fire: PTSD and Healing 1 RES.G Page 287 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese. War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. l understand that the memorial honors all the .nations that served in Vietnam as allies,, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print} k�Flf -'n1 I44 "Wm E -Mail, or Phone it 5.S3 -cho got))) Zg5 f-t-6 k 0 4'sfs Signature RES.G Page 288 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese. War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War.1 understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) —r-o4h 44 o Oration. E -Mail, or Phone # Signature .M1 C ye • COG RES.G Page 289 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council We the undersigned support the proposed American-Vietnamese War Memorial at Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. Name (Print) Address, E-Mail, or Phone # Vo24 pErsi M•M.INMNIMMNMM i. nature .1.1.■=.11.11.11.1w.M.M.II1•11•••1•1.1••■■•.1.6111•11•1••••••■• .011011.1.MOOMIMal.•••AIM.MMOWNIMMMEM W•■■■•••■•11.11i•••••••••• MMMM.NMM.MMIMMINMEIMMMMMEMMN.M.MMMEM MMM•MPMM •■••■•••• MWMMMEMMM.MMMEMMIEMM.MMOMMMYOMMYM■■••MN wwnw•••■ wmwm=1=•■•■■■■•=wW11■■=Wmwmde IMINW/MMIMMMWEMPMEMN.IMM.MMI•M.M••••■••••••••••1 •■••■•■•••••••••••••■•••••••■••••■••••••■•••••••••••••■•14N•PIOM ••••••••••••MMMMINWIMENIM■MME.MMWMPM.M•MMN .1.WII...1..••••■•■•••••••• .••■•■••••■••■•••■••••••■•• 1.11.1.111.11. ••■•••••■•••••••■■•■■■••••••••••••■•••••■■•••MMENM-MEMOMM. ..1••••■•■••■••MIONIMMEINOMMEM•••••■•••••■••••1••• .1.10••■■••••••••11.•••••11.1•141.• .I.M.11■111.••11.1.111.110•■•••••...1•14ma.bw.INY.11•10111141.1111111.111 MMS=.===.■■■■■■■====M=MINM=MM=MMMM MM-■■••■••■•■••■•••■■••■■■■•••■■•••■■■•■■■•■••••■■••■■•■ .==•••OWTO.I.PPOMM•■•■•■•••■■• Mml...■•■•.M.M■WWWWWWW-MMI MWM1M.MEN.NNMM.MMWMWM.WM.MM.M.MMMM.MMWMMM .W.I.OMMMNYMMAW•MIMOPMNIII.m••=.■••••••••••••.•1.• WWW===•■=MWMWM■■■■■■■■•••■••••■■■•••••••• ...1.=..nP..1..01.•101•41..1•...1.•MP1F01■41•WN.WWWWW•••■•• •MM.M.EMM.MMNMMOMMNOMMMEMIMIIIMO-MMOINANIMINii1.1■10.4•.= mma*wlwmmwm■-wwm■M■■■=MMMMMMM RES.G Page 290 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American-Vietnamese War Memo rial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. .I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) 171.111() Mymem Option, E -Mail, or Phone # Signature 1),4 t6)‘Adttl i)A,eafrVz-2, AM % q0angiukar 1g�i� aUb�.(Fr4. (77JN1/ 4 6 637 - Dir-§ac ztr) . -f.a .. ...i %L ALA a J u ieldi -4 9-s3 - ?3S -2019 "-- vin 2R f )A e i1 253 -20 - cq� RES.G Page 291 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) VU Ve(zi.civi Le_ �-►JG �-rnI N <w�� -cam ODtion, E -Mail, or Phone # (253) eri-i/der pk(ossocr gsz -a��q Signature CW9 g - 7o (2rypj -* 7 -gctor1� \9uyy4r4— RES.G (T) a1C —Ids O3- TRY- 7vs2 63- (i3 2- c655o 01573 73s` ago t? Page 292 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American- Vietnamese WarMemorial Alliance in their efforts to honor those who were once allies. 1 understand that the memorial is to honor all _the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further the memorial is to help bring healing to the participants and leaming to the community. The memorial is to be in Auburn Washington. Name (Print) Address, E -Mail, or Phone # Sign • ture \til n 014,4 17/ AAVIN- TWO j RES.G 9)fe 2-S-3 3 7,--?3 Z 417.- 332-4- Kr-S 3o 18/96' v33 6.zz - r fc, 2A9 wg •41.••••••M IMMIMMON.MIIMMOMWM.WHOIMMMNMMHMM Page 293 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) Option. E -Mail, or Phone # liv\t`PLAIn Igoe t98 16140 TiAv Signature 4e L (/ /)q CW( qq 7.a P/N14 d iri p _ _ p . !e ,i 440. Cow RLOAA. itAA' Tv j u LE (le 14" i7i AV 1 T-fA{ PAN t. eT—Scr`e- RES.G et..aothz, - Aot - qi 23-) . 01•0 s 2q 2_53 —au. -- 253 33Z )4C) 5-3 -714, 0,53 r R55 709 Gct�D z cros7 (2 1.24 f 7 2,53 0— 88 - ? '- 4f 74 r Page 294 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) v,Tyl ,) N Do Option, E -Mail, or Phone # Signatur 3- -66) -1 17 X53 - (9T0 - qIa?, ivey/44 lveL a53 -sao - rq.‘7 Inat T v u 4-- 621 Al{ lit01 ko-ij 161A0 ire e" Vt.at C3g —Gr Q #) Pit'( zs uT7 2z5.6 S^ 13_ 2 076-3- 737---7/37 _gr2:zth_k1122t_. rib A it .111 1.00 L 1 RES.G 02 5-2- 3g- dZ S- 3f727 Lt4`2-1 Lerner_ -aid e ow. 8-b7 W _54 29, -- 149 Dc-7 L52) 31 Page 295 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for.Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name, (Print) P fOGVIM y JJ tt.V -F) TA-C V• ( tC.��► T 1;r a t� Option, E- Mail, or Phone # Sig ture zg 24 71-S- 7 ,2,c3-c7-4/0 -13 To 2.s3 - ?L -- Ogg, 74 6 --77 0S—a..=, s- /6-3 . 3 zY. 35-al otic 1'U- rW /VVUNA) 7.zig gTSS83O kern_ " t Q5,-- 7 �16 [WV f vi>ifN AJ64yyN mik- 3n7 -6.-3 us- 1 6-Jr--L 2- g- 9 -33 - Czr_opl) 14-o3 -g- I77� -nz.kak) Le- Q4..)4{---o-i RES.G Page 296 of 465 ilutkzum4k, lzuk,AsoriA vl l 1 o f -9.9 [ 3 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show My support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance in their efforts to honor those who were once allies. I understand that the memorial is to honor all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and Women. Further the memorial is to help bring healing to the participants and learning to the community. The memorial is to be. in Auburn Washington. Name (Print) Option, E -Mail, or Phone # Signature _f(2-06) 417.12:_i KiM —Tl i l‘t* RES.G Thank you Page 297 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance in their efforts to honor those who were once allies. I understand that the memorial is to honor all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further the memorial is to help bring healing to the participants and learning to the community. The memorial is to be in Auburn Washington. Name (Print) O1- 4t4 eaddiffm_z 14 FL 44. 04.L/ rIs.�t Q21seuvAkc nl RES.G Option, E -Mail, or Phone # _ tai 4 f 14!. 4.- a . A A i a Signature if/-PA,m _ i 41144.4 Mow - �►��4r,s, r h�I�.R�y �C��»&c r• I.iEI AA.4/ eR,2Kim)_RS'7eAtrAco 4 ilE,��aGAd�l1 Thank you Page 298 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for.Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) Option, E -Mail, or. Phone # Dolv&k 2 ? 171 u UG'c« ormoscitpaw. term OIL G h + r Aston 1 g. vi• Hain +Ayuon 40.44;11 GO wrti L �-t� rrt�(i k,r i c n in[ eked con �Q2./ Y Signature uss, is w sfr_ @r . ,%., 7l. , e(� 7, 111 ( ,0 7.F3(17 ;' _,.Go6o tiqw Cl X vt 1f- a 2,6 ) 33-3 f6oC) RES.G • k-7/° 46?-ligi 1 Page 299 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. 1 support this memorial to honor American, South Vie tnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. 1 understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies; both men and women. Further, 1 believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) Option, E -Mail, or Phone # Signature j a 1 een)caxi7lieet _eftetied12 1-R.4 id CT TEA hi 1 4 j 17z,-1j TP- Ai \l L1.AJ- 72- Rcu (RAN\ Wto A y F-4/ /1 ; (f /gic1 Doc h4 W Tit T�tn�v►q 1 T 0600 .aom • X A N. T Y 77 N tI G e j ri (om Uw A-1-7--..1?,c 2 3 rt= r, Zci 66 041/A,JA .12 1�,�ox s3. 66/- 3) /;c,_ /4,42/e/t___ 69 ,goe? (946,) 50q7 0,C2 49i 512cc4t 25-3 - 680 - 92/s fib, fit_ -722L. /4 /ye it/ Y 7 ( //i'UV ( 7[3-72;1J-- RES.G Ia4 ■w1>v� 1.-/ Atrifili/ /AV .. / . -UV J 1JilV-ez Page 300 of 465 RES.G Page 301 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petrfron to Otow my srioport for the Joint American Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance in their efforts to honor those who were on allies. I under=stand that the memo' irai to honor cfl the nations :hat Served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. further the memorial i, tr. help hang healing to the particioants and learning to the community. -fhe memorial is -;n be in Auburn Washington. Name {Print) 1/ f 14'11 Asti E M.7rt, '7r- Dhc,ne 5r- n�ati.ir,L --y -C _/tl far.• �s�it—. .J.�c;•._'1L:llrt- ��(',i9_ai_., %_.J._ 6.R7 1 t. i ,,rte r ; `i='' ..C. C 4-- h'\ w�...�.4 ,,Jy. RES.G Page 302 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance in their efforts to honor those who were once allies. I understand that the memorial is to honor all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further the memorial is to help bring healing to the participants and learning to the community. The memorial is to be in Auburn Washington. Name (Print) E-Mail, or Phone #• Signature ) cloc, r -te S i A 4., RES.G Page 303 of 465 UiLixamn yr l-v.A 't - ua i avk Al — O 8 / i 115 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial proposed for Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I support this memorial to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. I understand that the memorial honors all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further, I believe the memorial will help to heal the wounds of war, restore pride to our veterans, and educate younger generations. Name (Print) Option, E -Mail, or Phone # Signa ure 14103 ZJ'c T v +� yx rs3 —g 314 .[_Ct. ••- RES.G Page 304 of 465 Dear Sir /Madam, I am writing you to ask for your support for the Joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial. The reasons are too many to put in to a simple Ietter. It was started by a Vietnamese Woman in appreciation for American -born veterans who served in her country. The idea continued with Mayor Lewis to place the monument in Auburn, a special place for veterans and veteran projects. The monument is intended to recognize the sacrifices and experiences of women, who are the least recognized during events like this. Thus there is a woman /nurse depicted. It goes further in that it acknowledges the experiences of medical personnel, who were always bystanders to the carnage and were tasked to care for those who survived. There is little to no recognition for them. I know this is true as I was a medic during Desert Storm. The monument is to provide a place for members of our community and our allies within the veteran community to remember and mourn lost loved ones and former comrades. Those would include those who survived and didn't. Imagine that Mt. Tahoma National Cemetery or any cemetery that contained your loved ones being bulldozed for out of spite and where your loved . one's final resting place has been paved over. That is how it is for us American -born and the Vietnamese community. A monument like this is a very difficult issue to face because of the painful memories, usually not dealt with in a healthy manner. Projects like this have always faced resistance. In 1986 Sarah Blum and a Vietnamese woman, also a nurse, started a project to bring veterans together in Seattle - they were physically threatened. In the end it brilliant success. Every Vietnam veteran I ever spoken to said they could not face "The Wall" in DC or were Ieft in tears. Now this is the most visited site in the Washington Mall. This is true for the projects in California, Texas, and Kansas. The Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial is intended to bring added value in coming years to City of Auburn and the veteran community with projects to teach, enhance the quality of life in Auburn, and even add to commerce through tourism. However, its projected intentions for the next few years are - to tell the story of the cost of Freedom - Democracy -Self Determination. The red and yellow flag of South Vietnam, that is intended to fly over the statues represent to the Vietnamese, their community, their heritage; and their lost homeland. It represents Freedom - Democracy. For most American -born veterans the flag represents what we gave and lost The yellow and red ribbon I wore during the.23 years in the Army still means the most to me, more that the Bronze Star, the Air Medal, or the Meritorious Service Medal (the highest peace time award). Vehicles up and down Interstate - 5 have red and yellow bumper stickers, more so than any other displayed. Even though there is a small minority of iIl- informed people opposing, we still receive notices of support all over the Puget Sound region and from other States who are watching us. We invite all people to work together for an effort of teaching and healing, just as the Traveling Vietnam Memorial Wall does where ever it goes. Thank you. Thom Stoddert, US Army ret. Co -Chair of the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance\ 360 -239 -1925. - A36Berlin @gmail.com RES.G Page 305 of 465 Thom From: Lan Phan Jones [ americanvietnamesealliance @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 11•:43 AM To: Nancy Backus; John Holman; Wayne Osborne; Bill Peloza; Largo Wales; Rich Wagner Cc: Peter Lewis; Thomas Stoddert Subject: Vietnam Veterans' Memorial I am writing on behalf of the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance to ask for your support for the proposed memorial for Veitnam War veterans in Auburn's Veterans' Memorial Park. The Alliance is a non - profit, charitable organization formed to honor Vietnam War soldiers including South Vietnamese and allied 'soldiers,who fought with Americans. We also strive to educate citizens about the history of the war and preserve the memory of those gave their lives in that struggle. We are not a polical organization. We are seeking 501(c)(3) status as a charitable organization, which limits political activity. However, we need the Auburn City Council's support to fullfill our mission. The Vietnam War stirs deep emotions. Many Vietnam veterans still suffer from post tramatic stress disorder (PTSD), often un- diagnosed and/or un- treated. Many will go to their graves with deep emotional scars and unresolved traumas. Others, as they approach their final years, struggle to find peace within themselves, These veterans need to hear that their sacrifices are understood and honored by their families and the community. They need a time and place to remember, grieve, and find peace. That is what this memorial is about. Bringing together the American and Vietnamese veterans is a powerful healing experience for veterans seeking spiritual peace. American veterans are surprised to learn they are honored as heros by the Vietnamese refugee community. They feel their loss less keenly when they understand the tragic loss and suffering of the South Vietnamese soldiers left behind when American withdrew from the war. The South Vietnamese veterans, now living as refugees in this country, long to be accepted and understood in this country. Often their lirnited English isolates them. Coming together with American veterans who honor their struggle restores their pride. They do not have many words; but they have a flag. When that flag is displayed and honored no words are needed to fill their hearts with pride and to make them feel understood. Last night, about 100 Vietnam Veterans and their families attended a Vietnam Veterans Appreciation Dinner at Holy Family Parish. Most were American veterans or Auburn residents. Councilman Holman and Mayor Lewis were there. If you had been there and heard the veteran's stories you would understand what the Alliance is all l about and what the joint memorial can do for the community of Auburn. By supporting the proposed joint memorial in Auburn, you support healing veterans and unifying the community. You also educate the public about the history of this nation's sruggle for human rights and democracy,and the price of the freedoms we enjoy as Americans. Respectfully asking for your support for the memorial, Lan Phan Jones Co- President, American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance RES.G 1 Page 306 of 465 Vietnam Veterafls Appreciation Dinner Time: 5:00 pm Sunday, August 11, 2013 Place: Holy Family Parish Dining Hall 505 17th St. SE, Auburn, Washington FREE to Vietnam Veterans & Spouses ($10 donation per person requested for others.) A time to honor American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers. A time to tell your story of survival and recovery after the war. Vietnam Veterans please compete and submit the form below to reserve your place now. First Name: Last Name: Branch of Service: Rank: Year(s) of Service in Vietnam: Primary Location(s): Include Spouse: ❑ Yes ❑ No E -Mail Address: Optional Friends, family, and supporters of Vietnam Veterans reserve your place now. First Name: Last Name Number in party: times $10 per person = $ donation enclosed E-mail address: Make checks payable to: Optional American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Mail completed reservations to: American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance 855 Trosper Rd. #108 -157, Tumwater, WA 98512 Or e-mail your reservation request to: American VietnameseAlliance ) pmail.com Dinner reservations at the door on August 11th will be on a space available basis. . For more information e-mail the address above or call Lan Phan Jones at: (360) 357 -7684 RES.G Page 308 of 465 EXPECTE-3 V EW. QF ACC i • • 'RES.G Page 309 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From:, Pete Lewis Sent Wednesday, August 14, 2013 1:21 PM To; Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial For Dani and council Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Ngoc Nguyen <ngocf30QgmaiJ,Com> Date: August 14, 2013, 12:56:15 PM PDT To: <Plewis @ auburnwa.gov> Subject: Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, Please support the Joint Vietnamese — American War Memorial.. Thank you David Nguyen i RES.G Page 310 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:39 PM To: Antoinette Manthey Subject Fwd: Vietnamese - American War Memorial All council and dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From:. Tamm y <tammvdaycare@yahoo.com> Date: August ZS, 2013, 6:56:22 PM PDT To: "nbacki:sRaubiimwa.gov <nbackusi7,auburnwa.gov >, "jhoIman©auburnwa.gov" <jhoiman@auburnwa.gov >, "wosborne@auburnwa.aov" <wosborneQauburnwa.gov >, "ioartridgeQauburnwa.gov" <inartridge@auburnwa.gov>, "rwagnerQaubumwa.gov" <rwagnei auburnwa.gov >, "lwales@auburnwa.gov" <lwales(a auburnwa.kov >, "bneloza@.aubumwa,gov" <bgelozaQauburnwa.gov>, "PlewisQauburnwa.gov" <Plewis@a auburnwa.gov> Subject:. Vietnamese - American War Memorial Reply -To: Tammy Nguyen aammydaycaregvahoo.com> Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial. Thank you very much Sincerely, Tien Nguyen 1 RES.G Page 311 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 8:38 PM TO: Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Objection to Joint Memorial in Veterans Memorial Park All CouncilMembers and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Francis Bannister <francisbannister@hotmail.com> Date! August 15, 2013, 8:35:37 PM PDT To: "wpeloza a.auburriwa.gov" <wneloza(aauburnwa.gov >, "wosborne@.auburnwa.uov" <wosborne@auburnwa.gov>, "nbackus@auburnwagov" <nbackus®auburnwa,gov >, "jholman@auburnwa.gov_" <jhohnan@auburnwa.gov>, "rwaaner@atiburriwa,gov" <rwagner@auburnwa.gov >, "jpartridge@auburnwa.uov" <jpartridge a.auburnwa.gov >, "plewis@auburnwa,aov" <piewis@iubtfrnwa.gov >, "Iwales cl,aubu riwa.gov" <Iwales @auburnwa. aov> Subject: Objection to Joint Memorial in Veterans Memorial Park Dear Mayor and Auburn City Council, 1 respectfully ask that you don't support the Joint Vietnamese American Memorial being planned for Memorial Park for the following reasons: There should be only one flag displayed in the park designed to honor American veterans and that flag is the Stars and Stripes. Using public property or public funds to support another country's flag would diminish the value of the current Memorial and offend many veterans. The current Memorial honors. all veterans from all conflicts and is keeping with Auburns goal to be an all inclusive community. The organizers of the Joint Memorial Project do not represent a majority of the veterans in the Auburn and many do not reside in the city of Auburn. While the project might have some merit it would best be received if it were placed on private property with private funding. Placing a Vietnamese flag in Memorial Park will serve as a negative trigger for many Vietnam Veterans and certainly do more harm than good. Vietnam Veterans suffering from PTSD are likely to avoid any trigger that reminds them of the pain they endured as a result of that conflict. The organizers claim that a majority of Vietnam Veterans could be healed by such a memorial is unfounded and has no evidence to support that claim. There may be a few testimonials but there is no such evidence that states a joint Memorial could cure the pain associated with the Vietnam War. A similar project was proposed in the city of Olympia back in 2011 and was abandoned by 1 RES.G Page 312 of 465 the Washington Department of Veterans Affairs due to strong objections by local Vietnam Veterans Groups in December 2011. I know a Little something about the Vietnam conflict because while I was in college earning my social work degree in Huntington, West Virginia (1982 -1983) I worked in a Vietnam Veteran Outreach Center for two years. During that period I learned that each American Vietnam veterans experience was different and there is no one single cure for the complex Issues associated with that war. I learned that those suffering from PTSD tend to avoid triggers that bring back the pain associated with that conflict. I Have worked in healthcare for 32 years: Today the practice of medicine is evidence -based and simply there is no evidence that suggests the Memorial cited above can help American Veterans deal with the complexities associated with the Vietnam War. Patients have a choice on the medicines they take and the one cited above has not been vetted and many veterans do not want it. Should you approve this Memorial in Memorial Park I wholeheartedly believe based on my experience that many veterans will see this as supporting a special interest group over the objection of the men and wornen who shed blood, tears and sweat to defend this country and some Vietnam Veterans will get the impression that their local government abandoned them in favor of "a special interest project. In no way should this be perceived as a slap against the Vietnamese community in the great city of Auburn. The vast majority of the people supporting the Joint Memorial are Americans citizens and take the same Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag thatyou take before every city council, meeting. We should all unite under the American flag to honor American veteran sacrifices. I respectfully disagree with their desire to place a memorial with the South Vietnamese flag in Memorial Park. The Auburn city government has no obligation to recognize veteransfrom other countries and no public funding or property should be used for such a project. Approving such a project will only divide the Auburn community. Respectfully, Frank. Bannister VFW Post 1741 Commander 2 RES.G Page 313 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 5:31 PM To: Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Support for American - Vietnamese War Memorial Categories: Red Category Please add to council and Duni Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Bao Nguyen <baonguyen41 @yahoo,com> Date: August 14, 2013, 4:44 :15 PM PDT To: "plewis@auburnwa.gov" <plewis@auburnwa,gov> Cc: chuyen Nguyen <nguyen.31369 @yahoo.com> Subject: Support for American- Vietnamese War Memorial Reply. -To: Bao Nguyen <baonguven41@yahoo.com> Dear Mayor Lewis: My name is Bao Nguyen, and I was a former Major in the South Vietnam Special Farces (VN Green Berets). I have met with the Veterans Association of Auburn numerous times in the past and we've had numerous discussions about building an American - Vietnamese War Memorial. As a result of our discussions, all sides agreed to work together and ask the City of Auburn to allow this project. I would like to ask you and the city council to grant us permission to go forward with this project., I would appreciate your support on this and thank you for your time and consideration. Please let me know if you have any questions. I can be reached at 425 -488 -2296 or via email at ivonguyen41@yahoo.com Sincerely Bao Nguyen Former Major South Vietnamese Army Special Forces (Green Beret) cc: Chuyen Nguyen President of Vietnam Special Forces Association of Washington 1 RES.G Page 314 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2013 9:59 PM To: Antoinette Manthey Subject: Fwd: Categories: Red Category Please include for council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: Fram: THAI PHAN <annafotovideo@vahoo.com> Date: August 14, 2013, 8:41:03 PM PDT To: "PEewis@auburnwa:gov" <Plewis@auburnwa.gov> Cc: " bpeloza a auburnwa.gov" <bpeloza? aubiurnwa.gov>; "jwales ri,auburnwa;gov" <lwaies@auburnwa.gov >, "rwagner @auburnwa .gov" <rwagner@auburnwa.gav >, 7inar0ridge©auburnwa.gov" <ipartridge@aubumwa .gov >, "wosborne@auburnwa.gov" <wosborneaauburnwa.gov>, "iholman gaubumwa.gov" <iholmari auburnwa.gov >, "ruckus a.auburnwa.gov" <nbackusa auburnwa.gov> Reply -To: THAI PHAN <amiafotovideo( ivahoo.cor> Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, Please support, the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial, I feel that it is time for us have a place to let our Vietnam Veterans. Vietnamese Veterans and our allies, to come and honor the Soldiers who sacrifice there life for our Freedom today. Thank you. Phan Thai RES.G Page 315 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Subject. Categories: Pete Lewis Wednesday, August 14, 2013 9:59 PM, Antoinette Manthey Fwd: American- Vietnamese War Memorial project Red Category Please send for Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Thuy Nguyen <vita saion80 @yahoo.com> Date: August 14, 2013, 8:59:26 PM PDT To: <Plewis@auburnwa.gov> Cc: <jhalritan a,auburnwa.gov >, <wosborne@aubumwa,gov >, <nbackus @auburriwa.gov >, <ipartridge@aubumwa.gov >, <rwagner@auburnwa.gov>, <lwales@auburnwa.gov>, <bpeloza a auburrmwa.gav> Subject: American - Vietnamese War Memorial project Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, 1 highly recommend you approve the American- Vietnamese War Memorial project to be build in Veterans Park in Auburn, this will get the community closed together. Thank you Thuy Nguyen 1 RES.G Page 316 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Subject Attachments: Categories: Pete Lewis Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:16 AM Antoinette Manthey Fwd: Letter for Your Support Letter to Mayor Lewis for Support,pdt; ATT00001.htm Red Category Please add to council anD Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Anthony Ton <anthonytonthQmsn.com> Date:. August 15, 2013, 7:05:12 AM PDT To: Mayor Lewis <Plewis(2 auburnwa.gov> Subject: Letter for Your Support Dear Mayor Lewis: I believe that you have known me very well; my name is Tony Ton, currently I am the president Of Vietnamese Air Force" Veterans Association of Washington State; I am writing this left er to you to ask your support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial in Auburn. I believe that your.support will make it happen and bring the existence of the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial to be established in Auburn so that it can bring the quality values to communities in the coming years to City of Auburn. Thank you very much for your support Respectfully yours, Tony Ton, 206 -852 -9952 anthonytonthQmsn.com i RES.G Page 317 of 465 The Vietnamese Air Force Veterans' Association of Washington State P.O, Box 24871, Federal Way, WA 98093 Tel. (208) 852 -9952 Email: anthorivtonthOrrian.com Mayor Peter LaWis Mayors Office, City of Auburn 26 West Main St Auburn, WA 98001 August 15,2013 LETTER FOR SUPPORT Dear. Mayor Lewis:. On behalf of the Vletnaraese Alr Force Veterans' Association of Washington State (VNAFV Association WA), I am writing thtsietter to you to ask your support for the Joint American Vietnamese War Memorial in Auburn. In the Vietnam War, American and Vietnamese soldiers had been forgotten: their services and sacrifices had not been recognized although their sacrifices were for the righteous cause and deserved for honoring. This-Joint memorial Is to commemorate and honor those who sacrificed their lives to protect not only for Vietnamese who were living in South Vietnam, but also for our freedom an d democracy; and specially to honor to 58,479 our brothers and sisters who not returned home. I believe that your support will make it happen and bring the existence of the Joint American- Vletnamese War Memorial to be established in Auburn so that It can bring the quality values to communities in the coming years to City of Auburn. Thank you very much for your support Respectfully yours, Tony Ton, President of VNAFV Association WA RES.G Page 318 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent Friday, August 16, 2013 6:53 AM To: ; Antoinette Manthey Cc: Tornio Bothell Subject: Fwd: Vietnamese Memorial for the Auburn Memorial Park Making sure all get to Council and to Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From B & D Anderson <billdonna52@comcast.nett. Date: August 15, 2013, 11:45:54 PM PDT To: <plewis @,aubumwa.gov> Subject: Vietnamese Memorial for the Auburn Memorial Park Dear Mayor I disagree with the Vietnamese community of Auburn who want to place a joint memorial with the South Vietnamese flag in our Auburn Memorial Park. Veterans from other countries who did not serve in the United States of America's Armed Forces should never be recognized in our Park. I am a retired Air Force Pilot who flew 158 combat missions aver North Vietnam and Laos in an F -4 during the Vietnam War. Of the 26 pilots who 1 trained with, only 13 returned. Thousands of our Air Force, Army, Navy and Marine combat men and Women did not return from the Vietnam War. Therefore, I strongly believe that our Auburn Memorial Park should only support those men and women who defended our country. Respectfully, William H. Anderson 32744 111th Place SE Auburn, WA 98092 1 RES.G Page 319 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:53 AM To: Antoinette Manthey Cc: Tamie Bothell Subject: Fwd: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Making sure all get to Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Steven Eneix <eneix.steven@hotmail.com> Date: August 16, 2013, 1:58:12.AM PDT To: "wpeloza a aubumwa.aov" <wpeloza@aubumwa.uov >, "wosborne@aubuinwa.gov" <wosborne @auburnwa.gov>, "nbaokus@.auburnwa.gov" <nbackus@auburnwa.go' >, ' "jholman c( uburnwa.gov" <jholman@auburiiwa.gov>, "rwagner©auliurnwa.gov" <rwagner@auburriwa.gov>, "lnartridae@auburnwa.gov" <jpartlidge@auburnwa.gov>, "plewis@a,auburnwa.gov" <plewis@auburnwa.gov >, "lwales c[Qaubtirnwa.gov" <iwales@aubt rnwa.gov> Subject: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Dear Mayor and Auburn City Council, 1 respectfully ask that you don't support the Joint Vietnamese American Memorial being planned for Memorial Park for the following reasons: There should be only one flag displayed in the park designed to honor American veterans and that flag is the Stars and Stripes. Using public property or public funds to support another country's flag would diminish the value of the current Memorial and offend many veterans. The current Memorial honors all veterans from all conflicts and is keeping with Auburns goal to be an all inclusive community. The organizers of the Joint Memorial Project do not represent a majority of the veterans in the Auburn and many do not reside in the city of Auburn. While the project might hive some merit it would best be received if it were placed on private property with private funding. Placing a Vietnamese flag in Memorial Park will serve as a negative trigger for many Vietnam Veterans and certainly do more harm than good. Vietnam Veterans Suffering from PTSD are likely to avoid any trigger that reminds them of the pain they endured as a result of that conflict.. The organizers claim that a majority of Vietnam Veterans could be healed by such a memorial is unfounded and has no evidence to support that claim. There may be a few testimonials but there is no such evidence that states a joint Memorial could cure the pain associated with the Vietnam War. A similar project was proposed in the city of Olympia back in 2011 and was abandoned by the Washington Department of Veterans Affairs due to strong objections by local Vietnam Veterans Groups in December 2011.. t RES.G Page 320 of 465 I know a little something about the Vietnam :conflict because while 1 was in college earning my social work degree in Huntington, West Virginia (1982 -1983) 1 worked in a Vietnam Veteran Outreach Center for two years. During that period I learned that each American Vietnam veterans experience was different and there is no one single cure for the complex issues associated with that war. 1 learned that those suffering from PTSD tend to avoid triggers that bring back the pain associated with that conflict.. 1 have worked in healthcare for 32 years: Today the practice of,medicine is evidence -based and simply there is no evidence that suggests the Memorial cited above can help American Veterans deal with the complexities associated with the Vietnam War. Patients have a choice on the medicines they take and the one cited above has not been vetted and many veterans do not want it. Should you.approve this Memorial in Memarial.Park I wholeheartedly believe based on my experience that many veterans will see .this as supporting a special interest :group over the objection of the men and women who shed blood, tears and sweat to defend this country and some Vietnam Veterans will get the impression that their local government abandoned than in favor of a special interest project. In no way should this be perceived as a slap against the Vietnamese community in the great . city of Auburn. The vast majority of the people supporting the Joint Memorial are Americans citizens and take the same Pledge of Allegiance to the American flag that you take before every city council meeting. We should all unite under the American flag to honor American veteran sacrifices. We respectfully disagree with their desire to place; a joint memorial with the South Vietnamese flag in Memorial Park. The Auburn city government has no obligation to recognize veterans from other countries and no public funding or property should be used for such a project. Approving such a project will only divide the Auburn community. Respectfully, Frank Bannister VFW Post 1741 Commander SPC. Eneix, Steven R. Operation Iraqi Freedom 2005 (OIF05) in country from 2004.to 2006. Dear Mayor and Auburn City Council by allowing another countries flag to fly in a memorial• park would be the same as having a Muslim flag flying at ground zero of the 9/11 memorial for 2 RES.G Page 321 of 465 the twin towers. United we stand, divided we fall! 3 RES.G Page 322 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Pete Lewis Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:54 AM To: Antoinette Manthey Cc: Tamie Bothell Subject: Fwd: Vote Against the Joint Vietnam American Memorial in Memorial Parts Making sure all get to Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Nick Tarbox <nctarboxQgmail.com> Date :. August 16, 2013, 4:50:24 AM PDT To: <wosborne@auburnwa..gov>, <nbackusQauburnwa.aov >, <iholmancauburnwa.gov >, <rwagner©auburnwa.gov>, <itartridgeeauburnwo.gov>, <plewis®aubumwa.gov>, <lwates @ auburnwa.gov >, <BpelozaQaubumwa.gov> Cc: Francis Bannister <francisbannister @hotmail.com >, Linda Tarbox <lctarbox a.gmail.com >, "Nicholas C. Tarbox, Jr? <anothermarine l 1 nuyahoo.com >, Elizabeth Tarbox <elizabeth.tarboxc gmail.com> Subject: Vote Against the Joint Vietnam American Memorial. in Memorial Park Mayor Lewis and Counsel Members, I am writing to you asking you NOT to support the Joint Vietnam American Memorial in Memorial Park. As a recently retired Navy Officer whose service ranges from just after the end of the Vietnam War to our present War on Terrorism I am totally opposed to this Joint Memorial as it is presently proposed. Such a memorial is not conducive to the theme of Auburn's Memorial Park which represents all American wars. If you vote to allow such a memorial as the one proposed you would then allow the park to be dissected apart with new requests from every group imaginable. Consider for a moment the Memorial as it is today and then as a place with joint American memorials with Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan, and it could go on and on. Auburn and its community enjoy a beautiful Memorial Park as it stands today without emphasizing any one particular war, conflict, or any of its allies. Ifa group or organization wishes to build a memorial emphasizing a particular war or conflict somewhere else in Auburn I could' support that and `I hope you would to. Very Respectfully, Nick Tarbox USN -RET t RES.G Page 323 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Categories: For Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Pete Lewis Friday, August 16, 2013 1.1:52 AM Antoinette Manthey Tamie Bothell Fwd: Vietnam Memorial Red Category t -. - Begin forwarded message: From: <tjahas@i, comcast.net> Date: August 16, 2013, 11 :25 :37 AM PDT To: <plewis r(auburnwa.gov> Cc: <wosbome auburnwa.gov >, <nbackus Q aubumwa.gov>, <iholman @.auburnwa.gov >, crwaaner@aubUrnwa.gov >, <jpartridge@a auburnwa.gov>, <Iwales a auburnwa.gov> Subject: Vietnam Memorial Mayor Lewis and the Auburn City Council This is my first letter ever to my city government. Never have I felt so strongly against a project that the city where I live is about to undertake. I,m talking about the Vietnam Joint Memorial. I,m asking you all to vote Against this proposal. My uncles fought in both Europe and the South Pacific,my two brothers fought in Korea.I joined the army and fought for South Vietnam. The point being We all served under ONE FLAG.The Stars and Stripes on OUR Flag have a special meaning for all veterans and should not fly with another flag from a country that does not even exist. 1 RES.G Page 324 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject Categories: Pete Lewis Friday, August 16, 2013 11:53 AM Antoinette Manthey Tamie Bothell Fwd: Support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial in Auburn!Wa Red Category For council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: - <n4883 @aol.com> Date: August 16, 2013, 11 :45:21 AM PDT To: <plewis@auburnwa.gov>, <nbakus @,auburnwa,aov >, <iholman®auburnwa.gov>, <wosborne@aubumwa,aov >, <ipartridge@auburnwa.gov >, <rwagncr cr aubi rnwa.gov>, <iwafes a aubnrnwa.gov >, <bpeloza(auburnwa.aov> Subject: Support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial in AuburnlWa Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial. Thank you. Dinh -March -Hung i RES.G Page 325 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Categories: Pete Lewis Friday, August 16, 2013 11:53 AM Antoinette Manthey Tamie Bothell Fwd: Memorial Park Red Category For Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <huntkr@comcast.net> Date: August 16,2013, 11:49 :38 AM PDT To: <bpeloza @aubumwa.gov>, <yvosborne a@,auburnwa,gov >, <nbackus a auburnwa.gov >, <jholman@a auburnwa.gov >, <rwagner@aubumwa gov >, <jnartridgea,aubumwa.gov>, <plewis a.auburnwa,aov >, <lwales@auburnwa.gov> Cc: Francis Bannister <francisbannister@hotmail.com> Subject: Memorial Park To the Auburn City Council, I am appalled of the thought for a joint Memorial Park to be shared with a Foreign Nation. 1 served my country as a Marine in Viet Nam and other (Shadow) conflicts with pride and with honor for 25 years. I have never once thought that a dedication to the "AMERICAN FIGFITING MAN" would have to be shared with another country's flag. To consider this Joint venture is a Slap in the face to every Military Veteran and all the men and women who sacrificed their lives to protect this nation. I can only hope that your loyalty as an American Patriot you reconsider you decision for a joint Memorial park. Respectfully F. Hunt Gysgt. USMC ret. 1 RES.G Page 326 of 465 ;Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Subject: Categories: Pete Lew_ is Sunday, August 18, 2013 10:59 PM Antoinette Manthey;" ramie Bothell Fwd: Please support Red Category Council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Alien Van <allenvan©r yahoo.com> Date: August 18, 2013, 10:38:11 PM PDT To: "Plewis@auburnwa.gov" <plewiseaubumwa.gpv >, "b peloza@auburnwa.gov" <bpelozaa@aubumwa.gov >, "lwales @auburnwtgov" <lwales@aubumwa.gov>, "rwagner [r auburnwa.gov" <rwagner@auburnwa.gov >, "ipartridge u@.auburnwa.gov" <ipartridge©auburnwa.gov >, "wosbome @aubumwa.gov" <wosbome@auburnwa.gov >, "jholman®auburnwasgov" <iholman chi auburnwa,gov >, "nbackus©auburnwa.gov" <nbackus @auburnwa.gov> Subject: Please support. Reply -To: Allen Van <allenvan Ayahoo.com> Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of the City of Auburn, Please support the Joint Vietnamese- American War Memorial. Best regards. Allen Van 1 RES.G Page 327 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Subject: Categories: Pete Lewis Saturday, August 17, 2013 1 :29 PM Antoinette Manthey; Tamie Bothell Fwd: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Red Category For council and Dani Sent from my iPlione Begin forwarded message: From: <jessejose@aol.com> Date: August 17, 2013, 9:59:38 AM PDT To: <plewis@aubumwa.gov> Cc: <•neloza@.auburnwa.gov >, <nbackus@auburnwa.gov >, <wosborne@aubumwa.gov >, <rwagnerl7a.auburnwa.gov >, <ipartridge @.aubumwa.gav >, <jholman a.auburnwa.gov>, <lwales©auburnwa.gov >, <dheide,aubu nwa.gov >, <francisbar nister a,hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Mayor Lewis, Thank you for your response of my email and for the information you provided. I didn't know that this Joint War Memorial is going to be privately funded. Please forgive me for my ignorance. But, who are these "State VA Director and his group "? 1 thought the VA is a government entity and therefore funded by us, taxpayers. Also, the proposed location where this memorial is going to be built is public land, and therefore owned by us, taxpayers of Auburn. And from what I understand, the maintenance of this Joint Memorial will also be shouldered by the city of Auburn, and that's us, taxpayers. Please correct me again if I am wrong with these assumptions. This idea of a Joint Memorial has never been presented to us, resident voters of the city of Auburn. The only things we've .heard discussed extensively by the political leaders of Auburn were the golf course and the dog pound of this town. I happen to hear of this idea of a Joint Memorial through my membership with the VFW Post 1741, and during one of our meetings, we talked about it, and except for a couple of silent nays, we voted unanimously against the idea. Most especially that part of the idea where the defunct flag of Vietnam would fly side by side with the Stars and Stripes. Only one flag should fly in this Veterans Park. Only one kind of war veterans should be honored in this park, 1 RES.G Page 328 of 4 5 and that's the veterans of the United States of America, who fought and gave their lives and limbs away, in defense of this country's ideals and way of life. Thank you for listening, Mayor. Respectfully yours, Jesse Jose CPO, USN, Retired, DAV (253) 804 -0525. ---- Original Message---- - From: Pete Lewis <pI yvisCcbaubumwa.aov> To: jessejose <j_essejose(aol.corrl> Cc: Bill Peloza <bpelozaCcaubumwa.aov>; Nancy Backus <nbackusCcaubur wa.gov>; Wayne Osborne <wosborne(d3aubumwa.aov >; Rich Wagner < rwaanereauburnwa .gov>;'partridge <idartridae@auburnwa aov >; John Holman <jhotmant aubumwa.aov>; Largo Wales <Iwates(5laubumwa.00v>; Dan Held <dheideaubumwa.gov>; franc'sbannister <franclsbannisterChotmell.com> Sent Fri, Aug 16, 2013 6 :17 pm Subject Re: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Just so you know if anything gets built it will not be at taxpayer expense. This was brought to us by the State VA Director. The group bringing it would have to pay for it all. As far as other groups wanting to come and pay for a monument for their sacrifice and pay for it I would think we should consider 't As a Viet Nam Navy vet I thank you for your service to your country Sent from my 'Phone On Aug 16,2013, at 5:24 PM, "jessejose@aoi.com" <jessejose@aol.com> wrote: Dear Mayor Lewis and Auburn Council members, I am a Vietnam -era veteran and a U.S. Navy retiree. I've laid my life on the line for this country and if called. upon to do it again, I'll heed my country's call without hesitation. I have lived in this tow n for over a decade now, and had grown fond of this little town. 1 do not agree with this Joint AmericanNietnamese Memorial. First of all, because it's going to be Auburn taxpayers' money that will be spent in building this Joint Memorial, and benefit only a certain group of people. The money could be better spend on fixing roads and other worthy projects in improving our town that would benefit all residents of our town. 2 RES.G Page 329 of 465 Second, why only a Joint Memorial with the Vietnamese? Why only with these people? What about other allies who fought alongside America's warriors in other wars? Like my Filipino ancestors, who volunteered and fought bravely with American soldiers, not only in World War but also in Korea during the war there, and in World. War I in Europe. And their loyalty to America have remained steadfast and strong, and got passed on down from one generation to another ... like my own generation. Many of my generation have enlisted in the US Navy, and volunteered to fight for this country during the war in Vietnam. My ancestors and us also deserve this kind of Joint Memorial, don't we? What about the Japanese - Americans at the outset of World War II, who were living then in America and volunteered to fight for America, inspite of the fact that their native country then was the "enemy," yet their loyalty remained with America? They also deserve this kind of memorial, don't they? What about those South Korean soldiers, who also fought bravely alongside America's warriors during the war there, surely they also deserve this kind of Joint Memorial, don't they? The list of America's allies goes on and on. If our town of Auburn is going to build a Joint. Memorial Park, courtesy of Auburn taxpayers, by all .means, let's build it. But let's include all the loyal allies, who have joined America's .soldiers in bravely fighting for America's belief of freedom and democracy. Let's don't leave anybody out! And let's fly the Star and Stripes above all other national flags. We, veterans and members of the VFW Post 1741 fought and laid our lives on the line primarily for this flag. No other flags were relevant to us then; no other flags are relevant to us now. If supporters of this Joint American Vietnamese Memorial are adamant in being exclusive of "others," let them build it with their private funds and on private land, not with taxpayers' money and on public land. Sincerely yours, Jesse Jose (253) 804 -0525 3 RES.G Page 330 of 465 The Information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individuals) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed..if you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited.. if you have received this communication in error, please Immediately notify the, sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. 4 RES.G Page 331 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent; To: Subject: Categories: Pete Lewis Friday, August 16, 2013 6:34. PM Antoinette Manthey; Tamie Bothell Fwd: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Red Category Send to council and Dani Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Francis Bannister <francisbannister@hotmail.com> Date: August 16, 2013, 6:30:20 PM PDT To: Pete Lewis <plewis@auburnwa.gov >, "iesseiose @aol.com" <jesseiose a l,com> Cc: Bill Pelota <bpeloza@auburnwa.gov>, Nancy Backus <nbackusQauburnwa.gov >, Wayne Osborne <wosborne @.auburnwa.gov >, Rich Wagner <rwagner@auburnwa.gov>, "ipartridge@auburnwa.gov" <ioartridge@auburnwa.gov >, John Holman <iholman @auburnwa.gov >, Largo Wales <lwales a.aubumwa.gov>, "dheid it auburnwa.gov" <dheid @ auburnwa.gov> Subject; RE: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Good Point Mayor but not on mun_icpal property as that can be considered as local government approval and support when put on city property. This 501c raising money since 2009? Use your influence to help them find a suitable donor for private property a little distance from memorial park? Compromise? Win - Win? Then any vet in the city can visit IAW their desire. I have had some vets tell me they will never set foot in Memorial Park while there is a Vietnamese flag there, only one flag, the one you wear on your lapel. The alliance offer is nice but many vets say no thank you, Lets Leave it at that. Win -Win No Deal! Respectfully, Frank Bannister VFW Post 1741 Commander From: plewis@auburnwa.gov To: iessejose©aol.com CC: bneioza@auburnwa.gov; nbackusQauburnwa.gov; wosborne cr,auburnwa.gov; rwagner @auburnwa.gov; ioartridge a,aiuburnwa.gov; iholman©auburnwa.gov; lwales(a,auburnwa.gov; dheid@aubumwa.gov; franciOannister@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Joint Vietnamese American Memorial Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 01 :17:13 +0000 Just so you know if anything gets built it will not be at tax payer expense. This was brought to us by the State VA Director. The group bringing it would have to pay for it all. i RES.G Page 332 of 465 As far as other groups wanting to come and pay for a monument for their sacrifice and pay for it I would think we should consider it As a Viet Nam Navy vet I thank you for your service to your country Sent from my iPhone On Aug 16, 2013, at 5:24 PM, "jessejose @ aol.com" <jessejoseRaol.com> wrote: Dear Mayor Lewis and. Auburn Council members, I am a Vietnam -era veteran and a U.S. Navy retiree. I've laid my life on the line for this country and if called upon to do it again, 1,ll heed my country's call without hesitation. 1 have lived in this town for over a decade now, and had grown fond of this little town. I do not agree with this Joint AmericanNietnamese Memorial. First of all, because it's going to be Auburn taxpayers' money that will be spent in building this Joint Memorial, and benefit only a certain group of people. The money could be better spend on fixing roads and other worthy projects in improving our town that would benefit all residents of our town. Second, why only a Joint Memorial with the Vietnamese? Why only with these people? What about other allies who fought alongside America's warriors in other wars? Like my Filipino ancestors, who volunteered and fought bravely with American soldiers, not only in World War II, but also in Korea during the war there, and in World War I in Europe. And their loyalty to America have remained steadfast and strong, and got passed on down from one generation to another ... like my own generation. Many of my generation have enlisted in the US Navy, and volunteered to fight for this country during the war in Vietnam. My ancestors and us also deserve this kind of Joint Memorial, don't we? What about the Japanese - Americans at the outset of World War II, who were living then in America and volunteered to fight for America, inspite of the fact that their native country then was the "enemy," yet their loyalty remained with America? They also deserve this kind of memorial, don't they? What about those South Korean soldiers, who also fought bravely alongside America's warriors during the war there, surely they also deserve this kind of Joint Memorial, don't they? 2 RES.G Page 333 of The list of America's allies goes on and on. If our town of Auburn is going to build a Joint Memorial Park, courtesy of Aubum taxpayers, by all means, let's build it. But let's include all the loyal allies, who have joined America's soldiers in bravely fighting for America's belief of freedom and democracy. Let's don't leave anybody out! And let's fly the Star and Stripes above all other national flags. We, veterans and members of the VFW Post 1741 fought and laid our lives on the line primarily for this flag. No other flags were relevant to us then; no other flags are relevant to us now. If supporters of this Joint American Vietnamese Memorial are adamant in being exclusive of "others," let them build it with their private funds and on private land, not with taxpayers' money and on public land. Sincerely yours, Jesse Jose (253) 804 -0525 The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are . hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other:than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. 3 RES.G Page 334 of 465 1 /7341 4i(bo14pJF cAlta"- xv2- I Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the joint 'American Vietnmese.War Memorial Alliance.in their efforts to honor those who were once allies.1 understand. that the memorial is to honor all the nations•that served in Vietnam as allies, both men and women. Further the memorial is L 'V bring healing to the participants and learning to the community. The memorial is to be in Auburn Washington. AU6 2 . 2013 Name (Print) Option, E -Mali, or Phone # AYCR'S OFFICE ...airtroheln121014(04 .v I . •••■••■•••• G24 d,j,r0 {(e1.42,44) 1! ..._ # :12r 2(3.1-1 r 614Qi).cun, RES.G • Page 335 of 4 5 6\0 41 6 VEiE2ANS Na /2141 vuf3R Co M :77E6 Petition to Auburn City Council I have freely signed this petition to show my support for the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance _in their efforts to honor those who were once: allies. I understand that the memorial Is to honor all the nations that served in Vietnam as allies,, both men and women. Further the memorial is bring healing to the participants and learning to the community. The memorial is to . be in Aubu VED Washington. AU K• 2 ;) 2013 Name (Print) : froepi A Idxess, E -Mail, or Phone # ear rose 114 7 diva 1 /.poi ..4.214..Eakerifkler r. 112,i .1/ ., _ Signature :4AYOR'S OFFICE loilvz.v..-mailmem.) ... 94,444ft- a to ,2,,.1naMa.. 0.E 121ciLft.casu •gem 7.0WWKl0 ��{oF�ylff�L_Cca� _ • AfitiCaLfS2m5ietirtaaafcat...., `.-cam :........t ow+.. i) i 44,11 441 'At &1r .. & m.0 '1._ .t k.'r 17q 03100.Cr14 A,►..I ir`?�� Ga.wdi1 _ - --- 3) /reNiawk Gg:Dikti y..4•0 RES.G Page 336 of 4 5 Dani Daskam From: Antoinette Manthey Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 9:48 AM To: Terry Mendoza; Tina Kriss; Dani Daskam; Council Members Subject FW: Vietnamese American War memorial Only one letter received yesterday! Terry, Tina and Dani — please add to appropriate packets. Thank you! Antoinette From: Pete Lewis Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 10:26 AM To: Antoinette Manthey; Tamie Bothell Subject FW: Vietnamese American War memorial Council and Dani Connect with me on Facebook From :, My=Linh [mailto:son_mylinh @yahoo.coml Sent: Monday, August 19, 2013 8:29 AM To Nancy Backus; John Holman; Wayne Osborne; John Partridge; Rich Wagner; Largo W ales; Bill Pelota; Pete Lewis Subject Vietnamese Arrnerican War memorial Dear Mayor Lewis and the Council Members of City of Auburn, As a younger generation, I would like to support the Vietnamese- American Veterans to build the Vietnamese- .American War Memorial, so we can follow their footsteps to fight for Freedom & Human Rights to all human being. Please support the Joint Vietnamese - American War Memorial. Thank you so much for all your supports to the younger generations. Sincere, MyLinh Ngo, president of Vietnamese- American Comunity of Seattle & Snohomish -King Counties 1 RES.G Page 337 of 465 Antoinette Manthey From: Sent: To: Subject: Pete Lewis Wednesday, August 21, 2013 1:23 PM Antoinette Manthey; Tamie Bothell Fwd: Vietnamese American Memorial Goes to Council (all of them even if some or all were copied) and Dani Mayor Pete Lewis Connect with me on Facebook www.facebook.comlauburnmaayor Begin forwarded message: From: David Schmidt <lstsargeantdl @comcast.n et> Date: August 20,2013, 10:30:45 PM PDT To: Nancy Backus <nbackus@a auburnwa.izov >, John Partridge <jpartridge@auburnwa.gov>, Bill Peloza <bpeloza@a.auburnwa.gov >, Rich Wagner <rwagneritauburnwa.gov>, Largo Wales <lwales@aubumwa.gov >, John Holman <iholman@auburnwa.gQv >, Wayne Osborne vosborne@auburnwa. gov> Cc: Pete Lewiss <plewis@auburnwa.gov >, "dheid@auburnwa.gov" <dheidaa.auburnwa.gov> Subject: Vietnamese - American Memorial Dear Auburn City Council Members: The time is drawing near when a decision must be made about building the Vietnamese - American memorial. As I attended the last council meeting on August 19th, I felt there were more reasons to have it in the City Park than not to. Let us use compassion and tolerance to come to the right decision not just for the Vietnamese but for American soldiers who fought there and are still suffering for it to this date. For some and I understand, the Vietnamese flag represents many things. For me, when I see it, I am reminded of a job left undone and the sadness inside for leaving them to their dciom. Please I beg of you all, do not crumble under any political pressure. They lost their country not because of what they failed to do but what we failed to do, and that's staying the course. People will come from far and wide to see it, not only the Vietnamese community but Americans who fought there as well. The Vietnamese community will maintain it, and as I understand, it won't cost the City a dime. And as I understand it too, their flag will only be flown on certain holidays like the Veterans Day. They love America, but they also love Vietnam. Please let them have it, or should I say let us have itl i RES.G Page 338 of 465 God bless you all! Semper Fidelis! David L Schmidt 1st Sergeant, USMC Retired 253 735 1653 Sent from my iPad 2 RES.G Page 339 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Dan Heid Sent: Monday, August 26,:2013 6:42 PM To: Tina Kriss; Terry Mendoza Cc: Daryl Faber Subject: Joint Vietnam Memorial Attachments: Dan Heid E -mails on Joint Vietnam Memorial .docx Tina, Terry: As we approach the approval of Resolution No. 4968, .1 wanted to share with you my comments, offered by me as a person, n of as City Attorney. The attached is what I sent to Mayor Lewis. Thank you. Da n Daniel B. Heid Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheid0aubumwa.aov The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the -use of the:individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication- and`are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any,disse urination, distribution or copying of this communication,. other than delivery to the intended recipient.is strictly prohibited.. If you have - received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. 1 RES.G Page 340 of 465 From: Dan Heid Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 3:54 PM To: Pete. Lewis Cc: John Holman Subject Joint Vietnam Memorial Mayor Per your invitation to e-mail you to let you know my thoughts — our thoughts — regarding support for (or opposition to) the proposed Joint Vietnam Memorial — 1 wish to send my thoughts to you. First of all, I want you to know that I am not writing this as the Auburn City Attorney, but as a citizen of the Auburn Community (I may not live within the city limits -'1 live just outside the city limits — but I have an Aubum address and I consider Auburn to be my town). Also, I am writing this as a Vietnam Veteran. I am including with this submittal a couple of a -mails I previously exchanged with Aubum VFW Post Commander Frank Banister— most current on top - oldest below. I do not feel I should repeat what I already said, though if you have any questions of me, please let me know. Also, I am sending this to you and Counciimember Holman — as both of you attended the dinner/celebration on August 11th. But if you would find it helpful or worthwhile to send this to the other Councilmembers, I would welcome your doing so. A few of the veterans who spoke up at the August 11th dinner/celebration talked about Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Though I was in combat and I had some rough times while serving in Vietnam (being engaged in combat firefights,' losing buddies, fearing that I will not get out of the present predicament alive and having someone die in my arms — I'd consider these signs of a rough time], I do not have [1 do not believe I have] PTSD. However, 1 believe that the incidents of PTSD were dramatically increased in Vietnam over the levels experienced from World War II and the Korean War. No one can convince me that the traumas of war were any less severe in World War II or the Korean War than they were in Vietnam. What was the difference? I can only think of two differences; more illegal drug use,2 and lack of support for those fighting overseas by the folks back home. Also, when I returned from overseas, in route to (U.S.M.C. Base) Camp Pendleton, the base from which I was discharged, I was bussed from (I believe) Travis Air Force Base to San Francisco International Airport to catch my flight south. However, once there, I was greeted, as were the other marines and servicemen with whom I was travelling, by hippies with signs that said things like "End the War* and "Bring Our Boys Home, sentiments that were belied by the loud shouts from these same hippies of "Murders," "War Mongers" and "Baby Killers." Not much of a welcome homel3 I know first hand how depressing it is to be in combat and facing all that goes with that, all the while knowing that the American .Society was not supportive of what we were doing -- what we were trying to do to help the people of South Vietnam. I would receive copies of the newspaper from my home town (two weeks late as they were sent via ship), only to read of college campuses closing down to protest the war in Vietnam, of anti -war protests taking place in cities and towns across the Country, of newscasters, politicians and Hollywood celebrities bashing the war in Vietnam_ . From my perspective — from what we saw from back home — that portrayed a lack of support for us — for what we were trying to do. Every member of my Recon Team, and everyone in my Platoon and my Company (Pm sure the whole Battalion), wished we were fighting a war of which the folks back home were supportive. Since we were not getting much support back home for our war efforts, where did we get any support? From our buddies, and from the people of South Vietnam. It may sound strange to say this, but even in w ar, in Vietnam I had — we had — some good times, though we also had some very tough times. 1 lost some buddies and saw some of them seriously injured. But I am glad that I had the opportunity to serve in Vietnam with the Marines of Recon. They were great guys. Also, one of the most rewarding things I was able to do while in Vietnam was to go on "Med- Caps," where we — a few marines and a couple corpsmen — would go out into the rural villages and provide medical RES.G Page 341 of 465 help to the villagers, most (if not all) of whom probably never saw a doctor in their life. Also, when we were in the rear, between patrols, we could occasionally talk to South Vietnamese citizens -- those with whom we could communicate, they with their Pigeon English and us with our Pigeon Vietnamese. They were glad we were there, they wanted us to be there and appreciated our help. It is for reasons like these — the chances to visit with people of South Vietnam and the opportunities to go out on Med -Caps — that I am glad I had the opportunity to serve in Vietnam. But for those who may not have had even these sources of appreciation, I can only think that serving in a war — combat setting — facing the dangers that go with it, without feeling the support and encouragement of the folks back home (and rather sensing a hostile anger toward the war), that can only leave a person discouraged and depressed, and less able to cope with the burdens of war. I am glad that the military personnel who served in World War 1I, in the Korean War and in the wars in the Middle East, did not have to contend with the hostile rejection of their efforts by the American Society. However, I believe that what we were trying to do, though not supported by the news media, academia, politicians, Hollywood and too much of American Society, was the right thing to do. This firings me to the Joint Vietnamese Memorial. If we cannot recognize the good folks of South Vietnam, �n whose behalf we fought and sacrifices, or worse yet, if we hold grudges against them, that is a continuation of the sorry sentiment too often expressed by American Society in the late 1960's and early-1970's,. essentially saying that we should not have been there, that our sacrifices were meaningless and our efforts were a waste of time, resources and personnel. If for no other reason than to convey the message that the efforts and sacrifices of those who served and fought in Vietnam — trying to help the people of South Vietnam — are valuable and deserving of recognition, the Memorial should be built. 1. As a Navy Field Combat Corpsman [Medic] with the First Reconnaissance Battalion, Fleet Marine Force [USMC], I was one of a six -man team inserted deep behind enemy lines, to track and report enemy movements. At least 50% of our missions ended in a firefight as one's reconnaissance ability ends when the enemy knows where you are. 2. I was able to resist the temptation to use illegal drugs while in Vietnam, but its use — the use of marijuana and heroine in particular — was so common, it was hard to not notice. But not all who suffer PTSD used such drugs, and thus I believe that tyre use of such drugs was an attempt by some to cope with.a depressing situation. Those who were not there — or not in that situation — may not be able to appreciate how,depressingt would be to have your life on the line — .being in combat, facing recurrent danger, losing buddies — in a war that is not supported — that is opposed — back home. • 3. I have heard that there are those who claim that such incidents did not happen, but I know what .1 saw and heard, and I cannot — will not — ever forget that, as I'm sure the other returning servicemen will not Moreover, such receptions most have occurred (at least at that location) more than just on the day I returned, as on the bus heading to the airport, the military warned us about this occurring, and cautioned us to not (over) react. It was hard not to react, but impossible to forget. Thank you.. Dan Daniel B. Heid Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheid@auburnwa.aov RES.G Page 342 of 465 The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. RES.G From: Dan Heid Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 2:24 PM To: 'Francis Bannister' Cc: Pete Lewis Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam Memorial Frank:. Thank you for your comments. But I feel that the attitude toward the Vietnam War is related to the People of South Vietnam. If we do not support the people on whose behalf we were there, how can we value the fact that we were there in the first place? Please know that this is something about which 1 feel strongly. The reason I feel the way I do is because I believe (l truly do believe) that what the U.S..w as initially trying to do in South Vietnam was the right thing to do — supporting a nation with which we were allied. Maybe we did not have to join With the South Vietnamese in their. "civil war" — or perhaps more correctly, their "war to separate themselves from the North," but we did, and our government sent troops in to help them. Once we did that, we owed it to our troops to support their mission and to try to succeed in their efforts — rather than just having the number of troops being sent over there increase, and with a recurring practice of "advance then pull- back," seeing the.number of dead and injured troops mount. I believe that the folks who sent us over there in the first place — those who passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution — our representatives in Congress — had no gumption or will to succeed once opposition to the war surfaces back home. With the marked increase of anti -war protests, and anti -war celebrities, Congress was impotent or unwilling to do anything to support the troops. That . was how I saw things when. I was overseas. Every member of my Recon Team and the other teams in my Company wished "why couldn't we be .fighting in a war like World War 11, where the people back home were supportive of what we were trying to do." Added to that [and/ will argue with anyone who says differently on this], most of the people of South Viet Nam wanted us there and wanted our help. That is what they there telling us and that is consistent with what we all saw after the U.S. Left — left South Vietnam in a lunch with the almost immediate fall of South Vietnam, and that is what we saw with the desperation of the boat people. The folks who were saying at the time [incorrectly from my perspective] that "the South Vietnamese didn't want us there" were saying that because that supports their argument that we should not be there, that we should end the war, that it was not a deserving war, etc. The message was that it was wrong for us to be there. Bluntly, the commentary that now indicates opposition to the South Vietnamese, especially that which is hostile and sometimes laced with unfortunatevulgarity and 'profanity, to me re- states the same sentiments — that the South Vietnamese didn't want us there, that we should not have been there, that Vietnam was not a deserving war, and that it was wrong for us to be there. Rather than that being a healthy dialogue, t� me, it goes counter to the long and challenging efforts — positive and valuable efforts — of our society to correct the wrongful approach too often taken toward the troops returning from Vietnam. To me, recognizing that we were there to help the people of South Vietnam validates our actions and our service. Disparaging the reason we were there — to help the people of South Vietnam — invalidates our actions and devalues our service. Page 343 of 465 When these negative sentiments are coming from folks who served in Vietnam, i have to ask: Do they feel that we- they - should not have been there? Do they feel that this was an undeserving war? Do they feel that serving in Vietnam is something that is disgraceful and something about which they should be ashamed? I recognize that such sentiments exist— they certainly do by those belonging to the "Veterans for Peace." But if these sentiments belong to members of the VFW, I am confused. I understand that the mission and vision of the VFW is to foster camaraderie among U.S. veterans of overseas conflicts; to advocate on behalf of all veterans, and to ensure that veterans are respected for their service, and are recognized for the sacrifices they have.made on behalf of this great country. Rather than seeing the rejection of South Vietnamese rand even the rejection of the recent VFW motion] as a healing measure, I submit it is a revival of the negative sentiments voices so often forty -plus years ago. And when it comes from members of the VFW, I feel it is all the more troubling — coming from a source that should support the folks who 'served in Vietnam, and recognize and value their service, not adding to the criticism of their efforts or the value of their service. I understand that. Mike Sepal brought this point up, but there is (no longer) a South Vietnam, different than any other war with which the United States has ever been involved. I am confident that there are memorials in other countries ,related to U.S. help in war — e.g., The Manila American Cemetery and Memorial in the Philippines, The Normandy American Cemetery and Memorial in France and The U.S. Korean War Memorial in Busan, South Korea, to name just a .few. There is no such memorial in Vietnam. There are not even any war memorials that recognize any combatants in Vietnam other than those who fought for North Vietnam. But even this is a different topic, though it is my answer as to why we needn't necessarily open the door for other memorials (not, mind you, something that 1 would find objectionable). Also, for what it is worth, I do not believe the fact that Olympia rejected a proposed memorial as a reason for Auburn to do so. Olympia is quite a different community from Auburn. Between the two, I am glad 1 am in Aubum. I know I went on for a while, but I'd like to talk to you about this sometime if we have the chance. Thanks. Dan Daniel B. Reid Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheideauburnwa.00v The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail. Thank you. TO THE BELOW, 1 RESPONDED AS ABOVE: RES.G Page 344 of 465 From: Francis Bannister jmailto :francisbannisterehotmail.coml Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 9:33 AM To: Dan Heid Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam Memorial Dan I have to tell you 1 really enjoyed your comments about the Vietnam War. Actually you said it all, its not about the Vietnamese people that our members are objecting too, its the war and all the consequences for American Veterans. Some can get past it like yourself and open thier hearts up to allied vets, some cannot, that is the dilemma that can divide the city. I think building it on private property can be a win -win for the city. Those vets that cannot make the leap you did can still come to Memorial Park without triggering feelings that might be harmful to our Vietnamese citizens and former allies. They will also avoid the perception that their government abandoned them once again. In -a private setting those who have Made the transition and fully forgave the war /Country can visit and serve as an example.and point of light for others, our Vietnamese alliance can also have a place they can call home and share their healing spirit with those who need it. Once again Dan, thanks for your courageous and meaningful comments, thanks for all you do for our post and its vets, I look forward to working with you to make our post a point of light for the City of Auburn. Respectfully, Frank A MOTION WAS MADE TO SUPPORT THE JOINT VIETNAM MEMORIAL AT THE JUNE MEETING OF THE AUBURN VFW POST. FOLLOWING A LENGTHY DISCUSSION, THE MOTION WAS DEFEATED - NOT APPROVED. UNFORTUNATELY, I WAS NOT IN ATTENDANCE, AS I WOULD HAVE SPOKE N IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. AT THE JULY VFW POST MEETING, THE ISSUE WAS AGAIN BROUGHT UP AS A DISCUSSION ITEM. A NUMBER OF PEOPLE SPOKE, AS DID I— AT THIS MEETING. THOUGH NO MOTION WAS MADE, I WOULD SUBMIT THAT THE SENTIMENTS SEEMED MORE SUPPORTIVE OF THE ISSUE. FOLLOWING THE MEETING POST COMMANDER FRANK BANNISTER THANKED ME FOR MY COMMENTS — ABOVE, THOUGH THIS DOE S NOT MEAN THAT HE PERSONALLY SUPPORTS THE MEMORIAL. From: Dan Heid Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 11:33 AM To: 'Francis Bannister; 'sepatmj(c aol.com; Auburn VFW Post Subject: RE: Joint Vietnam. Memorial Frank: This is a follow -up to our recent conversation regarding the proposed Vietnam Veterans Memorial being considered for the City of Auburn. You indicated that . you wanted feedback — wanted to know what the members of the Auburn VFW Post thought about a proposed Vietnam Veteran's Memorial that jointly recognized U.S. military troops and those of the military of South Vietnam, and RES.G Page 345 of 465 what the thoughts are of Post members regarding whether this Memorial ought to recognize the South Vietnamese military veterans along with U.S. military veterans. Here are my thoughts: As you know, I had the opportunity to serve with the U.S. Marine Corps in Vietnam. I was a Navy Field Combat Corpsman assigned to 1st Reconnaissance Battalion out of Da Nang — not.too far from the 17th parallel, between North and South Vietnam. The Marines of Recon, especially those of my team — Road Test, were the greatest group of guys I'd ever expect to have served with Marines alongside whom 'I had the greatest honor of serving. In our patrol missions, we would penetrate deep behind enemy lines to watch for enemy troop movements, and at least half of our -patrols ended with a firefight [when the enemy is shooting at you, your reconnaissance potential is severely curtailed]. As a Corpsman (a Navy Medic), I went out on patrols, carried an M -16 and my pack, and did everything my Marine teammates did, though when in a firefight, my first priority was to attend to those who Were injured or in need of medical help. [As an aside, 1 never saw any atrocities' as depicted in the movies. For that matter, once my buddies were all accounted for and okay, 1 would try to aid wounded enemy combatants — the folks who minutes before were shooting at This may seem counter- intuitive, but we — my team — looked at it this way: if bringing back a Wounded, but living, enemy soldier could help shorten the war, it was worth our doing, and besides, it was the right thing to do.] But when in the rear, in between patrols, I had the opportunity to talk to citizens of South Vietnam with my pigeon - Vietnamese and their pigeon - English [I must confess, theirs was better than mine]. Those with wham I spoke were glad we were there. I also had the occasional opportunity to meet up with military units of South Vietnam. In fact.! recall on one instance when our team's patrol was extended — the time out in the jungle was lengthened beyond what was initially planned to be. We here we were flat out of food, and we were directed to the camp of a South Vietnamese Popular Forces unit (an allied militia unit) which was not too far away. They willingly, graciously shared their food with us. It still amazes me to think how delicious a simple meal of fish and rice tastes when one is really hungry. If there is opposition to the: joint recognition proposal, as may be inferred by the question you asked, I do not know the basis for that opposition. I do not believe that a joint recognition would detracts from honoring U.S. Vietnam Veterans. Rather, I believe it may help put things in perspective. I also do not know what harm would stem from including in memorial recognition of the soldiers and militia of South Vietnam, citizens of Vietnam, the people on whose behalf we were engaged in the conflict of the Vietnam War, but from my perspective, those on whose behaff we were acting were appreciative of our presence. I know from reading the history of Vietnam that in the early 1950's, when Ho Chi Minh sought to expel the French from Vietnam (part of French Indochina), he aligned his anti- French forces with the Communist Chinese and Russians. When he did so, many hundreds of thousands of people who resided in the northern portion of the country fled Hanoi and the north, going to the south. That significantly increased the population of folks in the southern part of Vietnam who did not want to be governed by a communist controlled government, and the result of that exodus was to divide the country into what later became North and South Vietnam. You may recall as well from history that in response to the Civil War that followed between the divided Vietnam, a conflict that eventually drew the United States into the fray, the United Nations endeavored to resolve the conflict between the North and. the South. The United Nations sought to impose a ten -year cease -fire, (temporarily) drawing a line at the 17th parallel, dividing North from South. Along with that, the U.N. scheduled a reconciliation vote to be held in 10 years. However, as the year 1964 (the end of the ten -year period) approached, RES.G Page 346 of 465 opposition to holding the unifying election grew among many people in the South who did not want to be apart of a communist nation. Their thinking was that with the past ten years of independent, autonomous existence, the govemment of South Vietnam was sufficiently established and separate from North Viet Nam, so that the election was not called for. That opposition to the election, in tum, aggravated the fragile cease-fire, and civil war hostilities started to increase. This, in turn, prompted increased intervention by the United States military. (This is not by any means a complete history of everything that prompted U.S. involvement in Vietnam, but for the purposes of explaining my sentiments/response to your question, I believe it is sufficient.) I know that there were some people in South Vietnam who were opposed to the anti - communist government, and it may be that there were problems with the South Vietnamese government, like there may be with many, if not most, governments. We all may recall the vivid images of Buddhist monks who set themselves on fire to protest the (largely Christian supported) govemment of South Vietnam. But I submit, the Buddhists were not sportive of communist North Vietnam as much as they were opposed to the Christian controlled government of South Vietnam. A testimony to that is that once the Americans left Vietnam and the govemment of South Vietnam fell, no one suffered more at the hands of the (now) communist goverment of Vietnam than the Buddhists. From my perspective, they were expecting to be left alone by the communist govemment. of Vietnam, perhaps in exchange for their opposition the govemment of South Vietnam. But that was not what the atheistic, communist govemment: had in mind, once in control. And once in control, the communist government removed the right and opportunity for the people to select their rulers, which: at least existed to some extent prior to the fall of the South Vietnam government As I see it, before the govemment of South Vietnam fell, South Vietnam had a population which included many who were clearly more aligned with the United States and who had a desire not to be governed by a corrimunist- controlled regime. There were, again, Buddhists who were opposed. to the Christian population and likewise apposed to a government (an elected govemment) largely comprised of the Christian. population. There were also, of course, those less - politically motivated fouls who were more concerned about their next bowl of rice than the political persuasions of their neighbors. However, even twenty years after their exodus in the early 1950's, anti- communist sentiments continued among many of those who left the north to escape communism. Those who did not want to be under communist domination were the people who wanted us there; they were the people who wanted our help to avoid that. From my perspective, many people in the United States, including members of the television news media, politicians in Washington D.C., protesters on college campuses, hippies at the San Francisco International Airport, and Hollywood celebrities like Jane Fonda, missed the fact (or refused to believe) that these people did not want to be communists and that they wanted us there to help them. Their opposition to a communist controlled govemment would have been obvious to anyone who would look at things objectively. For that matter, it has been estimated that 65,000 Vietnamese were executed after the end of the war, with one million being sent to prison /re- education camps where an estimated additional 165,000 died. But their opposition would have been most clearly evident when one considers that many citizens of South Vietnam took the absolutely desperate measure of getting into overcrowded vessels of questionable seaworthiness, leaving everybody and everything else behind, not knowing where they would end up or even whether they would end up someplace, in an effort to leave after the fall of South Vietnam. Unfortunately, many such efforts ended in tragedy. The United Nations estimates that hundreds RES.G Page 347 of 465 of thousands of people seeking to escape communist. Vietnam perished because of these efforts. Anybody who disputes this description, and their desperation, should talk to one of these "Vietnamese boat people" many of whom eventually made it to this Country (the United States is reported to have accepted over 800,000 of these refugees). It is with anguish that.l think how tragically America failed the people of South Vietnam. They Were not failed not by the military troops who were trying to .help them, but by the politicians who vacillated in direction and resolve regarding the "conflict" and by those in the media and in Hollywood, and others, Who sabotaged the morale of the American troops, troops who were trying to do a task that bicame impossible because it was unpopular and unsupported back hothe. To answer your question, I would support a Vietnam Veterans Memorial that recognizes our partners in the conflict in Southeast Asia and that .recognizes the people who wanted us to be there. Recognizing the people on whose behalf we were acting helps show the legitimacy of our having been there. Ignoring triers draws into question the purpose for our being over there. They deserve our support; they deserved it then and deserve it now. I am sending this to the entire VFW email list to that (1) others know what I think making my position known — and (2) if there are others who may have thoughts in these regards, they may also wish to weigh in on your question. Thank you. Dan Heid Daniel B. Heid Auburn City Attorney (253) 931 -3030 dheidaauburnwa.00v The information contained in this electronic communication is personal, privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) to which it has been addressed. If you read this communication and are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication, other than delivery to the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e- mail.. Thank you. RES.G .Page 348 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:41 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: < no- replvnu,draandropbuilder.com> Date: August 27, 2013, 1:10:44 PM PDT To <plewis@a,auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <martin.b.holz@boeing.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Marty Holz MY E-MAIL (required): martin.b.holz@boeing.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 2315 27th pl. s.e. Auburn, Wa. 98002 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. 1 definitely think this should be placed in our already great city in which we support our veterans more then any city this side of the Mississippi. I lost my father in Vietnam who was from Auburn and his family continues to live here to this day.. Do the right thing Auburn and get this memorial where it belongs and show support in memory for not only our veterans, but also who was right by my father's and uncle's side during Vietnam. 1 RES.G Page 349 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent Tuesday, August 27, 2013 5:41. PM To: Dani Daskam Subject Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: < no- replyadragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 27, 2013, 1:03:43 PM PDT 'To: <plewis @,auburnwa.gov> Subject New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply-To: <nguven31369(a,yahoo.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Cliuyen Nguyen MY E-MAIL (required): nguyen31369@yahoo.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 8686 45th PL. W. Mukilteo, WA. 98275 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. I support the Joint American - Vietnamese memorial. RES.G - Page 350 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 9:13 PM To: Dani Daskam Stilled: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: < no- replv@,dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 27, 2013, 9:11:07 PM PDT To: <plewis @,auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply-To: <kykimnguven9661 @yahoo.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: KY NGUYEN MY E -MAIL (required): kykimnguven9661@yahoo.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 9661 Renton Ave South SeattIe,Wa -98118 Seattle, WA USA 98118 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. I' m Vietnamese Solder I respected 58.000 US solders die in Vietnam war for freedoom and democracy The battle was stop,but the war to figth for freedoam and democracy for VN to again VN communisme stil ahead. • Please help us who are VN Veterance of Vietnam_ War,supporting The Joint American - Vietnamese Memorial. Please approove this Project! Thank you ! 1 RES.G Page 351 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent August 27, 2013 10:37 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin •forwarded message: From: <no- reply @.dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 27, 2013, 10 :23:51 PM PDT To: <olewisaauburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <sepalmj@,aol.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Michael Sepal MY E -MAIL (required): sepalmi @.aol.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 6421 183rd Ave East Lake Tapps, WA United States 98391 I support the joint American - Vietnamese memorial.. I believe the Joint Memorial should be located on public ground, in the City of Auburn, Washington, in Veterans Memorial Park. It's important to note that currently 5 of the 6 Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorials, in other U.S. cities, are located on public grounds: 1. Sid Goldstein Freedom Park 14180 All American Way Westminster, CA 92683 Contact info: City of Westminster Community Services & Recreation Dept. Phone: 714- 895 -2860 1 RES.G Page 352 of 465 2. Orlando Veterans Memorial Park 2380 Lake Baldwin Lane Orlando, FL 32814 Contact info: City of Orlando Parks Division Division Manager: John Perrone Phone: 407- 246 -2287 3. Veterans Memorial Park 339 N. Greenway Wichita, KS 67203 Contact info: City of Wichita Director of Parks & Recreation: Doug Kupper Phone: 316- 268 -4628 Ezriail: dkupper@,wichita.gov 4. Veterans Park 3600 W Arkansas Lane Arlington, TX 76016 Contact info: City of Arlington Parks Director Pete Jamieson Phone: 817- 459 -5479 Email: Pete.Jamieson@,arlingtontx.gov Also, it's important to note that all the Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorials in other U.S. cities display both the American flag and the Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) flag. After the fall of Saigon on April 30, 1975, the Vietnamese of South Vietnam (Republic of Vietnam) lost both their country and their flag, .so an integral part of all Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorials is to display the flags of both countries: United States of America / Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam). Since the members of the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance are U.S. citizens, many of whom are Veterans of the Vietnam War, I believe the City of Auburn should grant their request for the proposed Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial in Veterans Memorial Park. The purpose of this Joint Memorial is to honor and remember all those veterans who fought side by side for freedom and democracy in Vietnam. 2 RES.G Page 353 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 11:22 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin •forwarded message: From: <no- reply @dragndropbuilder.com> Dater August 27, 2013, 11:17:30 PM PDT To: <plewis@auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <lanalovesbaby@,yahoo.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Lana.Taylor MY E -MAIL (required): lanalovesbabv @vahoo.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 731 1 5th St. NE Auburn, WA USA 98002 I support the joint American - Vietnamese memoriaL RES.G Page 354 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 201311 :11 AM To: Dani Daskam Subject Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent.fram my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <no- reply @,dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 27, 2013, 11:17:30 PM PDT To: <plewise,auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <Ianaiovesbaby@,yahoo.corn> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Lana Taylor MY E-MAIL (required): lanalovesbaby(a7yahoo.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 731 15th St. NE Auburn, WA USA 98002 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. RES.G 1 Page 355 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 11:06 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: The Puyallup City Council recognized the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom Flag as the symbol of the Vietnamese- American community Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From:. <pblaub(a,comcast.net> Date: August 28, 2013,.10:43:36 PM PDT To; Pete Lewis <PLewis(aauburnwa.gov> Subject: Fwd: The Puyallup City Council recognized the Vietnamese. Heritage and Freedom Flag as the symbol of the Vietnamese - American community Frrom: "Michael Sepal" <sepalmj@aol.com> To :.wpeloza @aol.com Cc: pblaubacomcast.net Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2013 3:13:53 PM Subject: The Puyallup City Council recognized the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom Flag as the symbol of the Vietnamese - American community The Puyallup City Council recognized the Vietnamese Heritage and Freedom Flag as the symbol of the Vietnamese - American community on December 2, 2003: http:// quockyvietnam .tripod.com/Puyallup Resolution.html RESOLUTION NO. 1834 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP SUPPORTING THE VIETNAMESE- AMERICAN COMMUNITY AND ITS DISPLAY OF THE HERITAGE FLAG OF VIETNAM, A YELLOW FLAG WITH THREE RED STRIPES. WHEREAS, many Vietnamese- Americans were forced to flee Vietnam in fear after the fall of Saigon in 1975; and WHEREAS, many Vietnamese - Americans make the City of Puyallup and Pierce County their home and have made substantial contributions to our culture, business and commerce; and 1 RES.G Page 356 of 465 WHEREAS, the vast majority of Vietnamese- Americans embrace the flag of the former Republic of Vietnam (South Vietnam) — with three red stripes on a yellow background as a symbol of their heritage and the promotion of freedom and democracy in their community and their country of origin. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PUYALLUP, WASHINGTON: Section 1. The City of Puyallup on this fist day of December, 2003, formally recognizes the yellow flag with three red stripes as the official symbol of the Vietnamese - American Community in Puyallup and supports the display of this flag at community events and at appropriate locations in the City of Puyallup. Section-2. The City of Puyallup encourages other cities and counties in Washington State to also recognize the yellow flag with three red stripes as the symbol of the Vietnamese - American Community. ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Puyallup, Washington, this 1st day of December; 2003 and signed in authentication thereof this 1st day of December, 2003. Kathy R. Turner, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gary—N. McLean, City Attorney ATTEST: Barbara J. Price, City Clerk . 2 RES.G Page 357 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Pent:. Thursday, August 29,.2013 5:40 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <no-reply @dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 29, 2013, 5 :19:30 PM PDT To <plewisaauburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply-To: <inf4thdivision @msn.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Ron Holz MY E -MAIL (required): inf4thdivision@msn.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 1214 W ST NW Auburn, WA. USA 98001 -3500 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. Being a Combat Vietnam Veteran who served early 1966 -1967 as a Grunt with the 4TH.Infantry Division in Vietnam , We had the full support of the ARVN Troops in battle with the NVRA, VC, and others; to protect and drive back the invading forces durring the fight for freedom of South Vietnam. I fought along side of the ARVN "S and they led us through the jungles of Vietnam inwhich they had been fighting in long before the US Military came into the picture, I saw many ARVN and Americans fall (KIA) together in fire fights with the enemy, we were the same ,in their Country doing what we could as a combined unit to beat back the enemy, with out their loyal support this letter would not be written by myself at this time. On OCT, 07, 1967 my Brother Gary L. Holz- 2/7 227 TH Air Cay. Helicopter Assult Team was killed in action,he was a Huey Door Gunner, we were in Vietnam together when he died,he left behind a Son "Martin Holz" and parents and myself. I visit the. Auburn Memorial Park often to just sit and remember Gary and my friends that never came home, I also think of my ARVN friends that never made it out alive. RES.G 1 Page 358 of 465 Some did get to the USA through much sacrafice and very hard conditions. We should be able to Honor all Troops that fought side by side durring the Vietnam conflict , I do not think they are asking for to much to have a home to also honor their Ioss's. I ask the City of Auburn to join in the effort to add to Auburns reputation for Veterans , all Veterans. I thank you for time. Ronald Holz Auburn High Graduate ,Class of 1965 Combat Vietnam Veteran Rated by VA at 100 % Disabled. 2 RES.G Page 359 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent :. Friday, August 30, 2013 7:23 AM To: Dani Daskam Subject :. Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: ' < no-renlvna.dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 30, 2013, 12:55 :11 AM PDT To: <p1ewis@a,auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply-.To: <1 stsargeantdl@comcast.net> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: David Schmidt MY E -MAIL (required): 1stsargeantdl@comcast.net MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 326 a st n.e Auburn, Wa King 98002 I support the joint American - Vietnamese niemoriaL 1 RES.G Page 360 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 2:34 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: < no- replya,dragndropbuilder.com> Date: August 31, 2013, 1:08:53 PM PDT To <plewis@auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form .Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <nghi20 I 038@yahoo.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Nghi Nguyen MY E -MAIL (required): nszhi201038(7a vahoo.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 11118 157th Ave. NE Redmond, WA USA.98052 1 support the joint American - Vietnamese. memorial. 1 RES.G Page 361 of 465 . Dani Daskam From: Pete. Lewis Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2013 7:34 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: < no- replyu,dragndropbuilder.com> Date: September 1, 2013, 7:33:25 PM PDT To: <plewis @auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <tldknya,,kmail.com> You're just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Lan Nguyen MY E -MAIL (required): tldkny @gmai1.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 2404 Redwood Ct Auburn, WA United States 98092 I support the joint American- Vietnamese memorial. Yes I support the joint American - Vietnamese memorial. This is a place to remind all the people who had experienced the war, who lived during the war, and this is a place to teach all of us about this war. 1 RES.G Page 362 of 465 Submitted by Thom Stoddert at August 19, 2013 Council meeting - audience participation Dear Sir /Madam, I am writing this to explain the purpose. Joint American - Vietnamese Alliance to aid you in your evaluation. All the reasons are too many to put in to a simple letter. It was started by a Vietnamese Woman in appreciation for American -born veterans who served in her country. The idea continued with people from several cities in the Auburn Valley, who had worked other veteran projects in Auburn. This resulted in the intentions /plans to place a monument in Auburn - which is a special place for veterans. The Joint American - Vietnamese Alliance was formed later to support these people and this project. The monument is intended to recognize the sacrifices and experiences of women, who are the least recognized during events like this. Thus there is a woman /nurse depicted. It goes further in that it acknowledges the experiences of medical personnel, who were always bystanders to the carnage and were tasked to care for those who survived. There is little to no recognition for them. I know this is true as I was a medic during Desert Storm. The monument is to provide a place for members of our community and our allies within the veteran community to remember and mourn lost loved ones and former comrades. This would include those who survived and didn't. Imagine that Mt Tahoma National Cemetery or any cemetery that contained your loved ones being bulldozed for out of spite or where your loved one's final resting place has been paved over. That is how it is for us American -born and the Vietnamese community: A monument like this is a very difficult issue to face because of the painful memories, usually not dealt with in a healthy manner. Projects like this have always faced resistance. In 1986 Sarah Blum and a Vietnamese woman, also a nurse, started a project to bring veterans together in Seattle - they were physically threatened. In the end it was brilliant success. Every Vietnam veteran 1 ever spoken to said they could not face "The Wall" in DC or were left in tears. Now this is the most visited site in the Washington Mall. This is true for the projects in California, Texas, and Kansas. The joint American- Vietnamese War Memorial is intended to bring added value in coming years to City of Auburn and the veteran community with projects to teach, enhance the quality of life in Auburn, and even add to commerce through tourism. However, its projected intentions for the next few years are'- to tell the story of the cost of Freedom - Democracy -Self Determination. The red and yellow flag of South Vietnam, that is intended to fly over the statues represent to the Vietnamese, their community, their heritage, and their lost homeland. It represents Freedom- Democracy. For most American -born veterans the flag represents what we gave and lost. The yellow and red ribbon I wore during the 23 years in the Army still means the most to me, more that the Bronze Star, the Air Medal, or the Meritorious Service Medal (the highest peace time award). Vehicles up and down Interstate - 5 have red and yellow bumper stickers, more so than any other displayed. It is not a defunct symbol. RES.G Page 363 of 465 Even though there is a group of veterans opposing this project, we still receive notices of support all over the Puget Sound region and from other States who are watching us. Much of the opposition was started as a result of one person's speech with ill informed information. The recent Vietnam Veteran Appreciation Dinner brought vets together from as far away as Arlington. The dinner comprised .75% American -born veterans and 25% Vietnamese -born, about one hundred guests coming after a short notice. Even though the dinner was intended for all vets, the opposition refused for the most part to participate. It is our belief that if everyone who has concerns over this project instead contributes the concern. but, not in opposition, a greater project will be achieved, A win - win situation will be gained for all veterans; the City of Auburn, and the communities in the Puget Sound. This has already been demonstrated by a member of the American Legion outpost in the Memorial Park much earlier this year. We invite all people to work together for an effort of teaching and healing, just as the Traveling Vietnam Memorial Wall does where ever it goes and will this Novembers. We ask that you carefully consider all sides and make an informed decision. Thank you. Thom Stoddert, US Army ret. Co -Chair of the Joint American-Vietnamese Memorial Alliance 360- 239 -1925: - ,A36Berlin @gmail.com RES.G Page 364 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent Saturday, September 14, 2013 7:29 AM To: Dani Daskam Subject:. Fwd: New Form Entry: Contact Form Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <no- reply @,dragndropbuilder.com> Date: September 14, 2013, 7:27:46 AM PDT To: <plewis@auburnwa.gov> Subject: New Form Entry: Contact Form Reply -To: <sgtrambald @,aol.com> You've just received a new submission to your Contact Form. Submitted Information: MY NAME: Rick Bulman MY E -MAIL (required): sgtrambald@aol.com MY HOME ADDRESS (required): 13319 15th Ave Ct E Tacoma, WA 98445 I support the. joint American- Vietnamese memorial.. 1 am a former Marine sgt. and Vietnam vet. 1 was in Vietnam in '67 -'68' (there for the Tet Offensive of-'68). Some of the greatest supporters we have had in this country are the Vietnamese community. we fought side ;by side in Vietnam for a common cause and now I feel that it is befitting that we have a joint memorial to celebrate our partnership both in Vietnamand in the US. 1 have never been shown greater respect or appreciation for my service in Vietnam than from Vietnamese soldiers. I think:it is time for unto demonstrate the same respect to them: We fought in the.same war for the same cause. They deserve the same recognition that the American soldiers do. RES.G 1 Page 365 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:01 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: In Support of the proposed American- Vietnamese War Memorial, Auburn, Washington Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: <Sepalmj(a,aol.com> Date: September 14, 2013, 11:44:34 AM PDT To: <ahjones @comcast.net>, <stoddertwork @,gmai1.com> Cc: <Dlewis@aubumwa.gov >, <dheid(&,,auburnwa.gov >, <iholmana,auburnwa.gov >, <bpeloza@,auburnwa.gov >, <wosborne@auburnwa.gov >, <Iwales@auburnwa.gov >, <ipartridge(7a auburnwa.gov >, <rwagner @auburnwa.gov> Subject: In Support of the proposed American- Vietnamese War Memorial, Auburn, Washington From: cmandevillec socal.rr.com To: plewise.auburnwa.gov, jholmanCc auburnwa.gov, bpeloza c(auburnwa.cov, wosborneCa7.auburnwa.gov, (wales @auburnwa.gov, lbartridgei auburnwa.cov, rwaciner @auburnwa.gov CC: stoddertwork(cb_gmail.com, a hjones[rD_comcast.net, sepalmj aol.com Sent: 9/13/2013 10:59:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time Subj: Joint American - Vietnamese War Memorial 13 Sept 2013 In Support of the proposed American - Vietnamese War Memorial, Auburn, Washington First let me introduce myself; l am LTC Craig H. Mandeville, USA (retired). Not that it matters in this discussion but I have two Silver Stars and .four purple hearts, etc. Currently I hold the position as President of the Vietnam War Memorial in Westminster, CA (501c3). I was just elected after our founder and President Frank Fry passed away. Frank was a former mayor and was serving on the Westminster City Council during the approval phase and just shy of 10 years after it was dedicated(31 April 2003). I mention Frank, a WW 11 veteran, because of his position on the council and his reputation within the Vietnamese —American communitymade our efforts considerably easier. The memorial was Frank's dream to help welcome the South Vietnamese to our country and show the pride for those Americans who had fought side by side for a free. Vietnam (since we had not been welcomed home properly). I have been part of the committee from the beginning, over 15 years. I have listened to the tapes of your city council and read the articles. It is des jar vu for me. I have heard all the arguments for and against the memorial. However, I have heard nothing that we didn't hear 10 years ago. I might mention that the strongest arguments came from the VFW and American Legion. I was startled. But they turned their backs on the returning Vietnam veterans as Well as scoffed at the South Vietnamese veteran and here they were doing it again. Those residents who presented their arguments were persons in the community who were against the war when it was going on and had not changed. In my opinion and supported by facts, many used 1 RES.G Page 366 of 465 the flag issue to cover up their prejudice against the Vietnamese. Others had a patriotic stance that no other flag should be on our soil or fly next to the US flag. BTW- the former mayor felt that way in the beginning and now she is our strongest supporter. After 4 years of discussions and 5 years of fundraising the city /county gave us 1'/z acres. Those same arguments about tax payer land, legal rights, up -keep, etc. all had been heard. The city council (the city) and the committee made a contract about construction timelines, ownership, maintenance, etc. Thank goodness we had lawyers working pro -bond on our behalf. The flag issue surfaced many times when veterans groups and well - meaning patriotic Americans questioned why the flags would be at the same height. I had to research the regulations to show them that were correct. Also, we decided to put one taller American Flag over the whole park that helped squelch that issue. The flag of Free Vietnam (yellow with three red stripes) seems to conjure up, for many, bad feeling/memories and whether it should be in a park with other memorials. FYI -our park is called the Sid Goldstein Park in memory of a local resident who won the DSC in Korea. I know it is not quite the same as yours. I wish I could speak before you on the importance of the flag of free. Vietnam -its meaning in history but more importantly for the Vietnamese- Americans(especially their veterans)and their families as well as those advisors(like myself) who fought side by side with the South Vietnamese for a free Vietnam. Please try to put yourself in the place of the South Vietnamese who not only lost their struggle for a free Vietnam but came here with nothing and lost everything to include their home. We cannot understand how they feel but the one thing that reminds them of their home and a hope for a free Vietnam is their flag. I can attest that thousands of Vietnamese and their families visit the memorial and they feel uplifted by the sight of their flag flying proudly next to the US flag. It somewhat lessens the terrible memory of losing their country and allows history to stay alive with their families. I know when you lose your country you lose your flag. That is why the flags together are for a time in history and place when there was a country and it will never come down in their hearts and for sure in Westminster, CA. For those American Vets who have bad feelings and memories about the South Vietnamese I can assure you I know the feeling. On my first tour in 1967 -68 I was with the 1015` Airborne and my battery was overrun. It turns out that the RVNs who were providing us security let the bad guys in. For sure, I left Vietnam on my first tour with a bitter taste. However, I was sent back to Vietnam in 1972 and was assigned as an advisor to a South Vietnamese infantry regiment. Needless to say I was not happy and did not trust them. I quickly learned that I could. One or two bad memories should not be a judge of all. Almost all American forces had been pulled out of South Vietnam and I can tell you that my regiment helped break the siege in An Loc in 1972 and fought as well or better than the 101St Airborne. In communist Vietnam today there is no sign of the flag of South Vietnam. Not anywhere to include their text books. They want to blank out the one symbol they fear the most. That flag is why we as a country went to war and why we, as Vietnam veterans are proud of what we did to help keep that a free country. It is appropriate to see the two flags together. When we approach such a memorial you are reminded of the over 58,000 Americans, over 250,000 South Vietnamese and allies who died fighting for a free Vietnam. For those who opposed the memorial here initially they are now our biggest supporters. It has caused healing and for many helped their issues with PTSD. When we started this, I had veterans at the Boeing plant where I worked who wouldn't even 2 RES.G Page 367 of 465 talk to me but after one trip to see the memorial and talk about it, their adverse feelings dissipated. To me iit is imperative that such a memorial welcomes the South Vietnamese to our shores who are now Vietnamese.Americans and show our respect for their homeland, their ancestry and the hardships they have endured. But also, that flag gives them hope for a free Vietnam one day. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me anytime. Also, my phone is 714 -655 -6119. God Bless America! 3 RES.G Page 368 of 465 Dani Daskam From: Pete Lewis Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2013 4:28 PM To: Dani Daskam Subject: Fwd: Vietnam War Memorial Attachments: P1010108- ok.JPG Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: "venchu36(4aol.com" <venchu36Qa,aol.com> To: "Pete Lewis" <plewis(aiauburnwa.gov >, "Nancy Backus" <nbackus @,auburnwa.gov >, "John Holman" <jhoiman @,auburnwa.gov >, "Bill Peloza" <bneloza(a?auburnwa.gov >, "Wayne Osborne" <wosborne @auburnwa.gov >, "Largo. Wales" <lwales @.auburnwa.gov >, "John Partridge" <ipartridge(7a,auburnwa.aov >, "Rich Wagner" <rwagner @,auburnwa.gov> Cc: "stoddertwork@u,gm.ail.com" <stoddertwork@ mail.com >, "ahjonesa,comcast.net" <ahiones @comcast.net> "xuan.sue.1e49 @,hotrnail.com" <xuan.sue.1e49 @hotmail.com> Subject: RE: Vietnam War Memorial Florida September 14, 2013 Honorable Mayor Peter Lewis Honorable Nancy Backus Honorable Commissioner John Holman Honorable Commissioner Bill Peloza Honorable Commissioner Wayne Osborne Honorable Commissioner Largo Wales Honorable Commissioner John Partridge Honorable Commissioner Rich Wagner Auburn City Hall 25 W. Main St., Auburn, WA 98001 Dear Honorable Mayor and Commissioners, We all know, in the Vietnam War, the American soldiers and Allied Forces fought bravely side - by- side with the Armed Forces of the Republic of Vietnam against the violent assault of the communist of North Vietnam with the full support of entire communist bloc. At the end of the war, the United States of America suffered over 58,000 casualties, over 300,000 soldiers wounded, and 1,600 still listed as Missing In Action. The Republic of Vietnam suffered more than 250,000 casualties, more than 750,000 wounded, and more than 3 million innocent civilians dead. To honor the brave soldiers who fought and died for the cause of freedom in the Vietnam War, the Vietnamese- American communities of Westminster, California and Houston, Texas, etc:.. have built a monument to honor them. We now have one in Orlando, a world famous city of the great state of Florida. We hope that these monuments will also be seen as a symbol of thanks to all our American families and friends who have lost their loved ones in the Vietnam War. RES.G i Page 369 of 465 Because of these honorable reasons, more and more monuments will continue to be built across the country. We know that without the support of the honorable Mayor and Commissioners of the cities our projects will never be done.. So we would like to ask your support the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance achieving their admirable goal of building a Memorial in your city. Thank you for your support and Best Regards Yen Ba Chu, President Vietnamese American Memorial Committee in Florida [P 1010108- ok.JPG] Vietnam War Memorial Dedication Ceremony on April 27th, 2013, at Veterans Memorial Park, Orlando, Florida D RES.G 2 Page 370 of 465 • RES G mumemime Page 371 of 465 CITY OFAUBURN CITY CLERKS OFFICE NOV 14 2073 November 14, 2013 Mayor, City Councilmembers: First of all, I am writing to you not as the City Attorney but as a Vietnam veteran living and working in the Auburn community. I am writing to explain why I support the proposed Vietnam Veterans War Memorial; something that I think would fit within Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. I was a Navy Hospital Corpsman. However, I spent most of my time on active duty not with the Navy, but with the United States Marine Corps — as a field combat corpsman with the Marines. [The U.S.M.C. does not have its own medical services, so that Navy corpsmen serve as the medics for Marine units.] While in Vietnam, in 1970 - 1971, I had the opportunity to serve with a great group of guys in the First Reconnaissance Battalion based out of Danang (near the demilitarized zone between North and South Vietnam). I was proud to serve with my Marines and proud to have served in Vietnam. Nothing I did was any more significant or noteworthy than what anyone else in my unit was doing. We all did what we could to do our job responsibly and properly. In Recon Battalion, we would go deep behind enemy lines to watch for troop movements and the buildup of military forces. Unfortunately, at least 50% of our patrols ended in a firefight. Our teams consisted of six or seven men, so we were always outnumbered, but fortunately we were also relatively well equipped. For example, even though I was the corpsman and I had the responsibility of carrying a fair amount of medical gear, depending upon what we were expecting to face on our patrols, I carried between 25 to 40 M -16 magazines (each magazine holding 18 to 20 rounds) and I carried between 12 to 25 hand grenades. At the start of each patrol, my packs generally weighed (starting weight) between 120 to 140 pounds. I worked with a great group of guys and 1 truly enjoyed the camaraderie I had with my teammates. However, I also saw, we all saw, the tragic side of war as well. I lost buddies and 1 saw many more wounded. General William Tecumseh Sherman reportedly said "war is hell." I won't dispute that characterization. However, perhaps like anywhere, there were good times and not -so -good times among my experiences in the Vietnam War. Among the good memories I have of Vietnam, some of the best, were from "med caps," where a couple corpsman and a few Marines (when not out on patrol) would go into rural villages and provide medical services to villagers who probably never saw a doctor in their life. The expressions of appreciation we received from these individuals are something I will always cherish. Additionally, I did occasionally have the opportunity to meet with and talk to citizens of South Vietnam, me with my Pidgin Vietnamese, and they with their Pidgin English. From these conversations I know that they appreciated our presence (the presence of U.S. military) and they appreciated our efforts to help them preserve their freedom. Notwithstanding what the news media and Hollywood may have been saying, people in South Vietnam did want us there. Hollywood and the news folks were wrong. The South Vietnamese people wanted their freedom just as we, in this country, want our freedom and would resist efforts to curtail it. I think of the desperation with which the boat people of Vietnam left that country, leaving everyone and everything behind in hopes of finding something better as an illustration of the fact that they did not want to live under a communist government. Bluntly, I am saddened to think how quickly after we left the South Vietnamese government fell. But what did we RE Page 1 Page 372 of 465 expect? When we left, we pulled all our support. But the North Vietnamese still had the support of China and Russia. At the same time that America was being told by news pundits and Hollywood celebrities that the people of South Vietnam did • not want us there, I know that many of them truly wanted us there and appreciated our help. With that, the general attitude in much of America (at least from what we heard and saw) was very Anti- Vietnam War. AIong with that, the reception to serviceman returning from Vietnam was very inhospitable and unwelcoming. Those who suggest that this was not the case are deluding themselves. While we were trying to do a task in Vietnam that was tough enough, the attitude and actions of Americans protesting the war made it even tougher, and that contributing to a significantly lower morale and a pervasive sense of discouragement. Every member of my team, as well as those of other tearrrs in Recon Battalion, regularly commented that we wish we were fighting in a war where the people back home supported us like they did during World War II and the Korean War. For me and the folks with whom I served, knowing what was going on back home made it very tough for us to go out in the field, facing enemy fire and contending with all of the other problems that necessarily accompany combat. We could not help but feel discouraged when we would hear about public protests and antiwar rallies, the closing down of college campuses, and all of the negative stories appearing in news. On top of that, when I returned from overseas I was confronted along with all of those who were returning with me by hippies at the San Francisco International Airport carrying signs saying things like "End the War," Get Out of Vietnam," "Bring Our Troops Home." The signs were mild compared to the verbal welcome we received. This same group of hippies (I do not know what else to call them), the ones who were holding the signs, were swearing at us returning serviceman, yelling at us, and calling us "murderers," "war mongers," "baby killers" and the like. Curiously, the woman carrying the sign that said "Bring Our Troops Home" was the most vile, vulgar and profane among all those I saw at the airport. Not a particularly welcoming return message! This is not a unique experience, and it did not only occur on the date I arrived at the San Francisco International Airport. The officer in charge of the bus that transported us from Travis Air Force Base . to that airport warned us about the picketers and advised us not to let than get tows. Along the same lines, I had a buddy who, when he and his unit returned from overseas, as they were being transported by train en route to their next duty station, dozens of anti -war protesters were laying down on the train tracks, delaying the train's departure for hours. Again, not a particularly welcome return message! These are reasons I support the joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial. It is not just for the South Vietnamese, but is for all of those troops who fought in Vietnam and who were made to feel that their efforts were unappreciated. It may be that this is not important to some, and it may be hard for veterans who fought in other theaters and in other wars to understand the discouragement that accompanies the public protests and antiwar activities that were regularly going on during the Vietnam War. But a Vietnam Veterans War Memorial that says thank you for your service is valuable even to those who were less excited about going to Vietnam. And a memorial that identifies a legitimate and valuable purpose for our presence in Vietnam is just as valuable, counteracting the negative message we were receiving, that we were wasting our time and what we were doing was not valuable or appreciated by the people on whose behalf we were doing it. RESaa 2 Page 373 of 465 I do not know why some Vietnam veterans would be opposed to this memorial, . but if they were . drafted, it may be that they felt they were taken away from their regular lives, placed into a military service that was not of their particular choosing and sent to fight:a war that was very unpopular back home. If anything, that would amplify the negative feelings about what they were doing. They, perhaps more than others ought to be thanked for their service. The Auburn Joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial should be built for all of those who fought in Vietnam, but perhaps particularly those who were drafted and who had no choice in what they did, and were also never thanked for their service. The tragedy of the lack of thanks, however, goes further than even just that. I had buddies who died in Vietnam. They were never be able to hear or see anything that would express appreciation for the tough tasks that they did, that they had to do, in fighting the war, trying to preserve freedom for people of South Vietnam when that was the subject of so much animosity by the people back home. They, too, ought to be thanked. Some might suggest that the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington D.C. serves as an expression of thanks. But I must point out that while it is good and right to recognize those who Iost their lives, that Memorial only Iists the names of the dead. It does not contain any reference to loyalty, patriotism or thanks for. service. I am a member of the Auburn VFW Post 1741, and although there has been a fair amount written by and from members of the Post, I am, unfortunately, in the minority in that group, in that I support the proposal for the joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial. But I am not alone in my position. At a Vietnam Veterans Dinner held at the holy Family Church on August 11th of this year, all veterans of the Vietnam War who spoke were in favor of the Memorial. I do not understand why veterans of other wars would oppose the memorial. To my knowledge, no other groups of veterans suffered the public hostility toward their war efforts that was commonplace toward the Vietnam War. It may be, however, that the opposition of these other veterans to the proposed Joint Vietnam Veterans Memorial stems more from the fact that they would not want a memorial built which would include a flag from Iraq or Afghanistan flying over a city park.. I don't . have a good answer for that, but that is not the same thing as a memorial to thank the Vietnam veterans for their service and to state, publicly, that there was a good and valid purpose for their presence. If people are hesitant to support the Memorial because is would include the flag of (former) South Vietnam, I say seeing this flag fly next to the flag of the United States of America would visibly acknowledge the validity of the purpose we were in Vietnam in the first place, to fight for the freedom of the South Vietnamese. Every single American base in Vietnam flew both flags side -by- side. This flag, now the Freedom and Heritage flag, acknowledges the Vietnamese refugee community, the people whose freedom we sought to preserve, and re -affirms the noble cause for which Americans and South Vietnamese fought, freedom. Dan Held RE'aF6 3 Page 374 of 465 ➢Ill�lllllNg I110141W /Mig HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH 505 17th Street Southeast, Auburn, Washington 98002 Phone: 253 -833 -5130 www.holyfamiiyaubum.org Fax: 253-833-3421 November 6, 2013 Mayor Pete Lewis 25 West Main St. Auburn, 98002 am writing on behalf of Holy Family Catholic Church, our Vietnamese Community and the whole parish staff in support of the American - Vietnamese War Memorial proposal for the Auburn Washington's Veterans Memorial park. We at Holy Family feel strongly about the purpose of the Memorial - to honor American, South Vietnamese and the allied soldiers of the Vietnam war through memorials, displays, events and educational activities that have been presented to you and the whole City Council. We believe that this endeavor will strengthen the relationship with the communities here in the city of Auburn. The Memorial not only heals the .wounds suffered by all of the Veterans of Auburn, but also is a strong symbol of solidarity and a bridge to continued peace to the community, So we wholeheartedly request you to approve and vote yes to this proposal. Thank you in advance for bringing this proposal to reality for the people of Auburn. Sincerely, Fr. Joseph Nguyen Priest Administrator Holy Family Parish Cc. Nancy Backus, John Holman, Wayne Osborne, John Partridge, Bill Peloza, Largo Wales, Rich Wagner RES.G Page 375 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis Aubum City Council Members 25 West Main Street Aubum, Washington 98001 FROM: PhL 1 Name (Ten) f zr fS c Street Address (S6 nha, tan dung) tLi City (Thanh ph6) State (Tldu bang) Zip Code E-Mail Address (Dja chi e-mail) RECEIVED II,' 0.1 2013 MAYORS OFFICE I support the proposed joint. American Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park, (TSi Ong ho dy, an xay turfing dai Viet Mg tai cSng yian Veterans Memorial, thanh phi Auburn.) Optional: Comment Box • (Add inform ation about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here ) Tay y: ghi them tin tuc ca nhen ve ly do tai sao ng he d4r 8n vao khung ban. gnatune (Ky tan) Jr- in` 31-1; Date (Ngaythang nam) RES.G Page 376 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Auburn City Council Members 25 West Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 FROM: y, -Do 4061 P uoNG -�uti C Ivy Name (Ten) (kl &' SE- 9,rb S Street Address (86 nh &, ten dicing) City (Thanh ph$) State (Ti4u bang) Zip Code LID (Iv H-6 4-0 @MA-(- C E -Mail Address (Eja chi e-mail) RECEIVED Nov 01 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE I support the proposed joint American Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial. Park. (TN eing hb dir an xay tu' ng dai Viet My tai cong Bien Veterans Memorial,.thanh ph6 Auburn.) X10 4 ise. fi �s�[ w iM bb� U i kew,ortel pctir Optional' Comment Box (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here.) Tray y: ghi them tin tic ce nhen v ly do tai sau ung h$ drr En vvo khung iren. Signature (Ky ten) 10 Date (Ngay Mang nem) RES.G Page 377 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lew is & Aubum City Council Members 25 West Main Street Aubum; Washington 98001 FROM: LwN N NGu GN Name (Tan) 'tZVI d s 3 (2 T4-1- ST. Street Address (S6 nha, ten fig) City (Thanh ph6) State (T4u bang) Zip Code E-Mail Address (flja chi e-mail) RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2013 .,AY OR'S OFFICE I support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. (T8i ung h$ dkr an xay tw7ng dai Vi t My t?i cong_vien Veterans Memorial, thanh ph6 Aubum.) v--1„15 u eh r PCLA/k_, Optional: Comment 8oit (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the jokit memorial here.) Tay y ghi them tin tuc ca nhan va lyy do tei sao (mg hQ ddr an vao khung trrn. Signature (IV tan) RES.G 11 1/13 Date (Ngay thing nom) Page 378 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Auburn City Council Members .2t West Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 FROM:- &id PLn Name (Ten) 1137o SE Zk ` P1- Street Address (S6 nh4, ten Wang) c�lxrr�n WA. q809,1- City (Thank ph8) State (Tilk bang) Zip Code Itekituiz E-Mall Address (Dla.chl e-mail) RECEIVED NOV 0 4 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE 1. support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park. (f 8i ung hQ du, an xay tu'gng dai Vet My tai Ong Bien Veterans Memorial, thanh ph$ Auburn.) Optional: Comment tax • (Add infonnationaboUt yorirself & masons for suppo ting the joint memorial here.) Thy Y ghi them tin t(c co nhen ve !y do ter sao ring h(z d;r an vvo Wrung ben., Signature (xy Mn) RES.G Date (Ngay thong nom) Page 379 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Aubum City Council Members 25 West Main Street Aubum, Washington 98001 FROM: TAO KIG(r-(e-ki Name (Ten) 2--kg 3O a-1 p L se Street Address (S6 nhe, ten fig) City (Thenh oho) State (Tr6u bang) Zip Code kke {t o*cb e.- 6)48" .mow.. E-Mall Address (Cia chi a -mailj • RECEIVED Nov 05 2013 .0 AYOR'S OFFICE,. I .support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park. (Toi lung h$ dif an xay tuceng dai Vi.t My tai cling vian Veterans Memorial, thanh pha Aubum.) Optional: Comment Box. (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here.) Tall?: ghi them tin tuc i nhen ve lj do tai sao ung h4 Or an veo khung tren. Signature (Kyi tan) tifo((.2o�3 Date (Ngay Mang nam) RES.G Page 380 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Aubum City Council Members, 25 West Main Street Aubum; Washington 98001 FROM: Name (Ten) 1730.3 S 31S P Street Address (S6 nhe, ten dint ng) .ern v.) eiPcT city (Thank phd) State (Trdu bang) Zip Code Loc n. 401...ht-r) E-Mail Address (fl)a chi e-mail) RECEIVED Nov 0 5 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE I support the proposed joint American- Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park. (TIN Ong h0 du, an xay tuvng dal Viirt Mg tai cSng Bien Veterans Memorial, thanh ph6 Aubum.) Optional: Comment Box . (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here.) Tay 9: ghi them tin trio c8 r han v 19 do t$i sao ung hQ du. en veo khurg tin. Signature (Ky ten) RES.G Date (Ngai thong nom) Page 381 of 465 V'7N f.._. ark Mc evau TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Auburn City Council Members 25 West Main Street Auburn, Washington 98001 FROM: RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2013 i AYOR'S OFFICE Name (Ten) 110- A 4 GiE P4i i a7 Street Address (56 nha, ten duang) st3 u %AA, q�oaz City (Thanh ph6) State (iiu bang) Zip Code E-Mail Address (Dia chd e-mail) 7 010) Le- I support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park. (TN tang ho du, an xay tuzgng dai Viet My tai tong vien Veterans Memorial, thanh ph6 Auburn.) TS.; cL i L-.a_ ma`s' c-4)1 At •� vic N awn , - n fioa Kg N., /.1-Z2n Ho, Sa y v X K h a 44 � Ksatt,r) T al' Z.--413..t74 h `#f c, �_a�n �. Icy bti f' '�',q,C. cowl - e 1 ! 'Q �G G 7 '� Optional: Comment Box a41 F mot/` �� J �o�n 1 � °"1 u (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memort ere.) Tay y: ghi them tin Mc cc nhan vv ly do tai sao ring hO dur an van khung &dn_ Signature (Kjr ten) lopt tan Date (Ngay thang nam) RES.G Page 382 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Auburn City Council Members 25 West Main Street Aubum, Washington 98001 FROM: 'Tffe VI/ Name (Tan) /25TY7 SP 0e9C 11Ja Sheet Address (S6 nhe, tan d i ing) W 4- go1.._ City (Thenh phb) State (Diu bang) Bp Code (Juno or O. a tir?) . der ? E Mail Address (Dja chi a ) RECEIVED NOV 0 6 2073 MAYOR'S OFFICE I support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans ns Memorial .Park. (Tai' ung ho du' an xy tu�gng dal Vet My tai cahg vin Veterans Memorial, thanh ph$ Aubum.) Optional: Comrrrent Bali (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here.) Trig jrr: ghi them tin tiic cc nhMn va ly"r do tai sao ring h* du, fur vao khung tren. Sign re (K,y tan) Date (Ngay (hang nem) RES.G Page 383 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Aubum City Council Members 25 West Main Street Aubum, .Washington 98001 FROM: -1(-6k),( 1/ut./ Name (Ten) f3o9 Sr�T� sr..� Street Address (S6 nhki, ten diem) /?lfu W 2 City (Thar►h phi) Zip Code State (Tied bang) i"enr/T'/11h @ cemitl in * *. com'> E-Mail Address (Dia chi e-mail) RECE VEU NOV 0 7 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE I support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Auburn's Veterans: Memorial Park. (T8i Ling hO d0' an xay tuvng dal Viet My tai cbng Sian Veterans Memorial; thanh phi Aubum.) au'n i44/-4L u-�i (/ice - - X11 ' %% frgiV/:4C/r- _ , 7, 7972 Optional: Comment Box - (Add information about yourself & reasons Arr. supporting the joint memorial here.) Thy y: ghi them. tin 4v ca nhin ng h¢ d{r : n vtro kh • trrn. &e(f RES.G ate (Ngay thang nem) Page 384 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis & Auburn City Council Members X25 West Main Street - Auburn, Washington 98001 FROM: NV4V1A-- Name (Ten) 1445 6q 54 se r Street Address (S6 nhe, ten (bong) Ci ty (Thanh ph6) State MO bang) Zip ,Code E-Mail Address (D a chi e-mail) RECEIVED 140V 0 7 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE support the proposed joint American- Vietnamese war memorial in Aubum's Veterans Memorial Park. (T8i ping hO du, an xay tu7o7ng ddi mot mg tei c8ng vian Veterans Memorial, thanh ph6 Aubum.) .A (1(2 4 -yawl W i‘z-f' 1:4,t ends;-- / . Ili A 41-vig' c ctzw Optional: Comment Box - (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint memorial here.) Tay y: ghi them tines ca nh&n v ly'y do tai sao ung hi) dui en v o khung tren. RES.G s Page 385 of 465 TO: Mayor Peter Lewis Auburn City Council M em_ bers 25 West Main Street Aubum, Washington 98001 FROM: Name (TOM 1ZO Z Sam St, 1U.0 Street Address (So WV, ten fig) City (Thonh ph6) State (Tau bang) Zip Code E-Mail Address (Dia chi e-mail) RECEIVED NOV 0': 2013 MAYOR'S OFFICE ! support the proposed joint American - Vietnamese war memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. {Teri Ong hO di,r an Ay.tu'gmg dai Vert My tai cong vien Veterans Memorial, thanh ph6 Auburn.} Optional: Comment Bax. (Add information about yourself & reasons for supporting the joint inemorial here.) Ti)y y: girl them tin trio ca nhan ve ty do tai sabring he dv an veo khung den: RES.G Date (Ngay Chang :Min) Page 386 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of-the Vietnam Required Required cJb 1r 11141- lleaCS Date: Na,/ 11 , .L_o t ; lVderavt s Mews Ark Park honoring American, War. Optional RECEIVED Print Name: 6. ei,�, "cr�^�^ p l?cl� Signature: Address: 16 4. City, State, Zip: `fit VIriL q gc l $ E -mail: NOV. I 2013 Phone: MAYOR'S OFFIC Print Name: 10. 61,.. R vutt Signature: Address: (-clot 5 2 Y# City, State, Zip: ,4u bLri, W, INGO/ E -mail: raLL a , ,b. "ta+gyres , wr; r y4.40 r r. Pet Phone: ,roi - 'O1 -3 332 /-D Print Name: /3f3 M , f-/44 re Signature: , 91 Address: J 37// s.e.abc2,10 19/ City, State, Zip: rric op_ cf gv 2/ .3., E -mail: Phoneo7$3_(0 'o —!n E '1 mss, AftpAi Print Name: Signature: Print Name: Signature: Address: GI j'? Ic .0,_c ado, SE. City, State, Zip: q.,rburi WA g80°J2 h, u t ivy .I 'o DoK 331 , rN2.+ k ri- t C.44 E -mail: Csyr, awn tha<230A0A. Phone: 6-7 O v Co q ci slims Address: 3 �- r S,ier /01ire_ [ E -mail: City, State, Zip: 4/q 9T,3 phone: Print Name: •Signatu Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: RP Poafion sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 387 of 465 1, Jail 777at Heals Date: f / ! l 20 /3 Petition to Auburn City Council support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: N- FilemiA rewe,r Address: 3bi b 5 110-4141N1 Av6- Signature: City, State, Zip:17Np~ . r 1nl4 yo it i E -mail: A-1 J5reW r C Vino( 1t t.1i- Phone: 2� . 4-9-9 0 7 5 Print Name: acG!hvsS Signature: A Address: 1::)1 vyk, City, State, Zip: \4.N\ cv- E -mail: Lp Phone: ':..I`T1L.c Est Print Name: Signature: Address: rn .‘a l ' City, State, Zip: v.Q fliN LI) c E -mail- L; eg L IN ; ryk9 n corn Phone: L .2.5,LCrd(,15Q6,1 Print Name: _Not , Signature: rr 4 Address: i-noi .44.\ 101 City, State, Zip: t b(,f l', t A* E -mail: r,.,,t �,i ct 15 I @1 -�,-F cr\xi I• C orn Phone: 509 - (o 1 15 4 Print Name: SA ma L. PALY Signature: Address: 13 711 sF - 2021,4 City, State, Zip: Kin +� INA 9,54/2 E- mail:. 6tteL 22. C1J Phone: 253_4 Print Name: Signature: ` .nio Address: - %f_t l eri n City, State, T ‘ 0-uppi � ; Phone: E -mail: c �F� (ob.a` Lot4 REeNgn sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War IYlemorial Allan:* Page 388 of 465 wa /t That ReIs Date: Nk/ 11 1 Lo I, Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's.Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: aI./c/ Ad ha s. f to Signature: Address: 7, ¢ "'� �4. W, City, State, Zip: Se •‘ 77k.-f, 4j4 98'f/ E -mail: Phone: Print Name: LA. C1J Signature: Address: fey37 se i9y+i rL City, State, Zip: K,e„r 6r W ft 9 ro3 3 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signatu Print Name: E n Signature: FR Address: E -mail: City, State, Zip: c j6�, Phone: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name >o /3€ pt, 07 Signature: lu tt"K,eiT Address: / 3 T! / Z, t r fS/Atr,._ ,� ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: Am/ 1(/4- 94 1 / Phone: Print Name: J ob e Ica Address: fl c ie Rol 67 ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: JalAti t l is Z / ; Phone: RES.G Petition sponsored by the American- Vretnsmese War Memorial Alliance Page 389 of 465 (,tea. // That /t(ec/s Date: fil\lo\/ 11 , 4013 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial inAuburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: % � � e d 942-"(--et Signature: Address: 2 y a p Z 2 Z 0 IL 5E City, State, Zip: E -mail: P qSo rG Phone: 36 v r(' f 6 1 0 Print Name: 4 ' Signature: • Address: '2S 3v / r 3S /1 vz - sc City, State, Zip: Pe`/2 E -mail: Phone: lac' J (4- rfcra. 2fld 232- Zr7$ E -mail :.zJeg) /dQ577-• -■- Phone: Q53 - 777 -- Print Name: 1 j r ; Address: Pie' 'Me.+C Cars foy zz 153 r-oh ve gms ; Signature: t4 City, State, Zip: S n er, w 4 go E -mail: gub�'rd. McCraw , rGoco", Phone: Z 5-3 °Y47- 849Z_ Print Name: 1 Signature :` rn cvey, Print Na 4/gag . Signs Address: jA ) 42-6 City, State, Zip: `� o N N . 1 E -mail: F3- vice, iii s rr1C 4.1,1 , Phone3— s,L-l1a� Address: 172i_ti7 City, State, Zip: oAhit E -mail: Phone: 02s3 - - l l Print Name:rymjpg1L GoNeiy657 Address: I/21; //0 7N PL St Signature: 40/;0 City, State, Zip: a /✓7o' , v 41r-ors- RES.G Petition sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance E-mail: Co,'r$k6S747 a Phone: inq 3,1a 66 9► i Page 390 of 465 AJa << Th Date: Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required literds Erc, 3 Required Optional Print Name: Signature; ;Ncl l e G- af61Pa Address: Pic& y fs5 /cA City, State, Zip:L �r e 7-9 r 0 s Tb 3 9 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: to +4,e 2400 1 ; E -mail: -City, State, Zip: Ar21,77 LL)14 f f f6 y ; Phone: A-1/6'o 6300 vc., ce,,r7 V 219 6 — 6449'31 ,tt vvi C y Gam tfittt Print Name: Signature: Address: !G2. 7 £�,,,�ahJ goc /t(6 City, State, Zip: ie'i tsr A. g 6 d,s6 E -mail: tAi.ic ti,340e J G,„a' I e' Phone: ¥2s-- 3 oC - p2 3. Print Name I' 1 Signature: Address:c,2e? 31 AliPS46"/ City, State, Zip: prtibuiepi /444 9 BGII E -mail: Phone: a�G . `� — 9 a / Print Name: Signature: Address: c'arj £/ 57 ,4 ST - City, State, Zip: 1/73 1 E -mail: r n( WA/ - 9eao4- Vet, 4 ENGamnfiry 6 �69 [-- one Phone: 0 6 -37a -2 0 7/ �� Print Name: Per /r1A,g.7 Signature -Q./ Address: / 7z5 S. 3 f y City, State, Zip /' ryy I qg E -mail: (J%loz/ r _f c4,? cz19 j„-79; Phone: `.(4 y7-9- 7(1\, f C 0 )-) , RPeG HNonsponsored by the American- Vietnamese war Memortat Affiance Address:I /o25. 5. 37: 4K11-11 City. State, Zip: W E -mail: Phone: ,2 S 7, ;77 -2, 7 ? kG. Page 391 of 465 &Jul/ 7114,# teals Date: Na•l , I I .� -� 13 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in:Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name�m ;Address: �o Sfi, Signature; r ty, State, Zip: A 0 buy-y7, Wei l E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signatu 14cre+r!Sir Print Name: 1d , S lr\tK Signature: Address: Z WAS 1 i City, State, Zip: S e Q4- (Le Glee E -mail: Phone: i Address: 7 Z Casc. e U r e W t r E -mail: City, State, Zip: cAutotv,o d u 2� Phone: 366 -ro 6-C Print Name: Signatu 4./_0n a t ddress: ,7. tP 97- f/! j SE 'City, State, Zip: al4- 9g)/i. Print Name: 01 1 L(,E i_ ?06e4 Signature: Address: 2c 100 t g® . So v G i City, State, Zip: A-''bip { u,i/1 • ow E -mail: 414.0 ^)N 0 4(03;20 )9f .0 Phone: a%3 ,e, 3d - %49 E -mail: Phone: a 06, 755 - RES.G Petition sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 392 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required kict-11 That floicds Date: 11/ 11120/3 Required City, State, Zip: T,c,„,4 t.JA 1 NI Optional Print Name: 5K-`wkek t dik-r,t42 c„_ Signature: efili/ArAa44,..& Address: cf471 4/4_ City, State, Zip:'-'747rear„..,4•_ 6,0741 f )) E-mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: c.,:evz-kzAd , Address: Ai s7:5- s' City, State, Zip: fer,_ L4 �S7 E-mail: Phone: Print Name: -2 Signature: 7F/%1eir-7 Address: t.,Lff - 111 City, State, State, Zip: 19 ar-4 YCZe_ E-mail Phone: Print Namea311.0. A paw, a itt Signaturek24 Address: ,341./ 112 E-mail: City, State, Zip4u iovi: 5? %,:), 7, Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: j&R E-mail: City, State, Zip:/267/4044_07.40, Phone: RESt6n sponsored by the Amencan-Vietnemese War Memorial Alliance Page 393 of 465 rvl E -mail: JfAa , W,eBE co vaioc, .. Cp Phone: "]aZ -72f - ZZZ LJa I! That-- Date: // / / I Petition to Auburn City Council 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required e«1S 2o1 Required Optional Print Name :ectWet / 8eow /c Signature: fij_.._..21etalL Address: z03,9.,/ / -, 4- City, State, Zip: /r-e/p. a4 new E -mail: Phone: ZS- d4o -o � Print Name: S » is `, Signature: Address: fan � b 3 t_ 1 i7 :21I City, State, Zip: / 2„,,. h .-. v✓' t r �7 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: 5TAM W 1 Eat Address: in t5444' Sr. ,u . ry Signature: City, State, Zip: Au toortio , q8 oa Z Print Name: NI& Signature: Address: cNif go sj 4- City, State, Zip : -rocadeta E -mail: Phone: (95,a ?/60x) Print Name: Signature: ,!a Address: t /d-$ lift f/ < s{, City, State, Zip: grt 41'0) dva E -mail: (/c 'ft- Phone: S $ );_ Sy5.2— Print Name: mete-r l N SiC/ iff.4 Art J Z. Address: Z 1 �Q .i✓ 4 E- mail: tSiN-Ie.p979 Me. i <-- c o4,1 Signature: ity, State, Zip: ,r, �� i , Phone: sta. of o °! . .17 7 3 RES.G Petition sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 394 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council tJal t 774 /-lea jS Date: //7 Gf I 2° /4■ support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Print Name: 5 Signatur J EV ( 1orJ Address: �� 5g .t$t 143 17 City, State, Zip: A j ,C.`! q g0 cr 2 E -mail: Phone: City, State, Zip: Print Name: e y Address: /0 a l a t` .sr eve= City, State, Zip: 4.th u r n w / 9FoV Phone: E =mail: Signature: //I-71 / RES.G Petition sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 395 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council LJa.11 That "leaf$ Date: 17/_11 /2a /3 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Address: 134, S city, State, Zip: Alee1ta4 f p W9 By 39 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: MAt eUNit Address: t1Y?-05 cgixt [� City, State, Zip:(7,..ye411043 J f¢ fe83 z_S • E -mail: f Sit Lsoi- Phone" .953 3 077'! Rt. o 1� i 4 � `•E Address: S City, State, Zip: „Intl Lake 1jA ?g37 ; Phone: Address: E -mail: E -mail: DM'N /E 2t0V494CoMc4S7f ,t?CT• Phone: VF.t-- City, State, ZipM,Na f A ,93 Address: % -2 7740-5 G ; E-mail: t9!!g It City, State, Zip: 4 WIt `l g a57 Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: 3 2 + -1 -r it PING. S , City, State, Zip :0 ciSost E -mail: .Phone: RAr1UOr1 sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 396 of 465 Vey Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required coca/ -pied- Date: if 2 01 Required City, State, /4,029.00•14-, 4 74409*,,,,4 Phone: Print Na Signet Optional ddress: 575- Xtree6C2W-41— ity, State, Zip:S3N/4e60/4, 1;19:54362 Address: fte3ag re: City, State, Zip: E-mail: Phone: 5535 -.2-7 E-mail: f,/ej fif6 r. 5 7 /7e7 Phone: 05 51/- elY INtainGsponscred by the American-Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 397 of 465 91 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in:Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional rI 7L*4 eRlS Date: Nov ll , -4/ 15 `f e1ero..ws In Bru o real Park Required Print Name: Signature: Address: 7O/6- keifir... _ E -mail: City, State, Zip: Yok Phone: E -mail: Phone: zit, (a - q Print Name: ; ; e ,,ado Address: 1 q Io �� E -mail: Signatu:;. v,rwev) City, State, Zip: fia, bus 0 i hone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: tr7iOr sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War MQemodal Alliance Page 398 of 465 E -mail: A ..a.„,„,„ _____ ;hone: ' G } 1`` ° a o to Petition to Auburn City Council 4t Date: // f to % 2 o 13 46e. Veh -tteAvis hi co, I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print$ame:' Signatu Address: 41,e2a } -41 c4 b,,a c>1 S �� E =mail: City, State, Zip: 4c.1 4. X42 44 v' e7004id Phone: 4(L.- .773- S5 7 - , tgCP1 \41Z Address: City, State, Zip: WA , E -mail: C Coati 147 - 11.1746;( .Cowl Phone: as-71....-7 35 -1 ti 8 Print Name: /4,4,,,,J the Signature: Address: / 4,6 t - ,S E 323 City, State, Zip: )L.`, E -mail: / r Phone: Print Name: ma, 11� a r) I e Signature: A-Nyla Address: 170( ktbuin j2lu E- mail: d I c . aUm „in, Lap. My" Phone: (253) 737- 5301 City, State, Zip Print Name: ddress: (� City, State, Zip: S QM Signature: 1 Print Name: i,Address: City, State, Zip: Signature: RES.G Petition sponsored by the American - Vietnamese 1 mortal Alliance E -mail: Phon Page 99 of Oc3 Petition to Auburn City Council Lc) ii -1-144-# eat.< Date: ionm I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name:=7„10+4-1‘i CAxl" Signature: Address: .2()4214o la f" PL 56: City, State, Zip: „own , LoA q Fit) 4-4 E-mail: Phone: Print Name Signs Address:ZUL City, State, Zip: 14-1 p 1 E-mail: tyk6itin 14014 cis:041.4_ Phone: Address: 10 Scr... F_Co City, State, Zip: %ado (4R-& E-mail: pm tic- 600g ea itAcc4-. 4.0 Phone: Print Name: .,vOl (Vick Address: tAtiti f-tv bl 3r 5r E-mail: Signature: VaafrattiVrk City, State, Zip: frorvtivi6 e O14tl 11 01 L. Wati Wit 101°Ye Address: lqxii ix 51-_, E-mail: c a id e copvtc a 5t. vie L. State, Zip: Co viv4ro,„ 9 ra 4 ?. Phone: / _?,0 Print Name: Gior 1. 0_ 0-- tv Address: / 9 it 7 6- E-mail: City, State, Zipeovin 97jjif Phone: RES.G Petition sponsored by the American-Vietnamese War Merhortal Alliance Page 400 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: ;Address: fin. fco�n..._. Address: l -- -o x36,`4' pi, Signature: Pinwicc,.6 otkuvrti4 City, State, Zip: .p 9go JS E -mait: 2/ Phon Q 5) aJb- 11019 Print Name: R ; c HARD Signature Address: 41-S A sfi s r vf4 5/S- City, State, Zip: A 9Vl 4J tV,4 18taata E- snail: Phone: Print Na oK „ d' -ck SignatuQ7. • - p�-��; Address: y.2 q fi ASf S* 4 ti a City, State, Zip:44,r,,., t"... - i Froc'-z E -mail: /ZAk9LS la 6 rAy4ri•«. -� Phone: Print Name: S r& &l e rf z Signature: e r? Address: 1�-1ro sr 3igiA 51- p;°I City, State, Zip: E -mail: Qrt-z- eCorwCa sl • YI t Phone: As 3 -06- - ') 3 n PrintName:A Signature I A Print Name00 Signature: Y Address: 3( ltL IL\Okk> City, State, Zip: \,$ \ 1f\ , ac iL E -mail: Phone: ( ■s\t. _ e ■ h, CC Address: City, State, Zip: RES.G Petition sponsored by the American- Wetnamese war Memorial Alliance 32-74- 7Y/ C-74:: E -mail: ,i, (` . u a iv Phone: S. -77 Q. / c/7 Page 401 of 465 Ve Vdr Petition to Auburn City Council Wet( mat 1-feeds Date: /17/0 /20/3 I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required optional Required Print Name: Address:3 S' 0 1 (� �� v,r �.► w(\ Signati City, State, Zip: W A WY13- Phone i53.) k ° -1 t,3b Print Name: nl ac4� as iS 4eAd-r- Signature: Address: iiaQs Alvrs1 City, State, Zip: Aotvr,o Spo_ I .__ ' E -mail: goltnal. corn cog• � ; Phone: 'las- ?to 13 Print Name: Signature: a nkr l; )hk - * Address: // S71" bk ft ; E -mail: a GUA- City, State, Zip: ,. �✓� 780 i hone: gsp -z,z 2i,- Print Name: h18717.-rt-- Signature: (k iL„ Address: 4'a yg .4 Q 5 /U. [ E -mail: City, State, Zip: &I A.., fkJ 'W:2 Phone: J33_ 833-5a Print Name: Signature: i O. eQUe i Address: ti a Z1/, ` C� '— gicti E -mail: bLUNA. tcl# 47kla City, State, Zip: Phone: s� -B33 -s r-T751 Print Name: Signature&atij e. e� -Address:/pO �oV O Af • d it i; 0 City, State, Zip:.e t 9f!!8 Email: h Phon (jO6) 7„33 FW n sponsored by the American-Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 402 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council (Aial! 1 " / -/ea /S Date: /11(0! 2 0 13 I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Signature: Address: 23(,34 Cheek_ }(4dumK L! I3 City, State, Zip: )4arr, wk-- rie,037_ E -mail: J weal G,wA��. �. Phone: 2a(. 3)4, 44 -1 '103 Print Name: Signature: oa,n' Address: 213'6 09 4 i, s+- City, State, Zip: a»n 4. E -mail: Phone: 1c,c) £L,r1g a c — 2S3 ?62, 4s3 Address: fd:2_ ,s�f ec71--- �(j E -mail f s— _ �'���•• City, State, Zip: ,b!/,, 4 frei ? Phone: ZC1 WOf- Print Name: Signature: Ar541 Address: 3/110/ 0842' P/, 60 City, State, Zip: e_ofted GJ4, LJfi C1Ivz ? E -mail: { f CL4 e Cprn C�.3 Phone: c2 3- ai1_[og�� Print Name: -QY lo+ 8n Signature: Address: 4t ig fj Yj/tfrd.Ce`■ City, State, Zip: _ f / J cl g `p �" E- mail• ' mac{ r i C. e e.001/133* Phone: 2E -75-42.—A7 � RES.G Petition sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 403 of 465 Wall 744/- /ea IS Date: (I o 2c) Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in.Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Signature: Address: (,L E - LARC1A PL - City, State, Zip: SHi`L -rot WA q `i E -mail: Phone: Print Name: nr 1/ Signature: Address: GI 1 -014-Gin E -mail: City, State, Zip6kalcon c '%Ll Phone: E -mail: PS' d "€ r afar //‘ (o 1.-1 Phone: 2a & 7 3 3-657 t Print Name 10/V/s /1/44141._A AIL Signatu Address:, Zd 4- s r St City, State, Zip: 4 k.B )04f /j 9 0 0 Z E -mail: jerAi ,7Zcits -n,0 Phone: Print Name: Signature: tAddress: 45124, _ rjelkirk ; E -mail: am_ City, State, Zip: r F CALOARi.tclieicitre": .2-c) City, State, Zip: ll I _ 1! , 01/41 930 d1 Phone: q3'1 • v r L kjc).4,, Phone: E -mail: Print Name: Signature: jddress: City, State, Zip: Fief sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 404 of 465 VM V Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's. Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required I,JQ/I Matt / /ea /s Date: !/ I (0 2 a 13 Optional Address: 01 0 City, State, Zip: L 0 ci I° (4 qs Phone: a C Q- 6, c g g E =mail: Print Name: t7 AA t4 L IQ s Signature: Address: li // ST SC City, State, Zip: Atiju ue_ �-- E- mait:bggj LEA S714-n1 L j Co 04 A[ L . ()Jig( Phone: asj733.g— Print Name: T LMw K g e9 r5 Address: /0 30 ) 2 4" A y so E City, State, Zip: ,UNe y 1 AIA-E 7e39/ E -mail: g 75- oQKi� C.,cv -t Phone: 2 -3 —7oq_ ?cJ ago Print Name: qri Signature: pi)) / cmooloG 6 Address: 6(1_ 97f i'l So - City, State, Zip:,rczo E -mail: Phone: 3 Print Name: ✓ �. �, / k H Signature m Address: 30 yo i�`J� / 4(/J J City, State, Zip: A44,/.7 74.' 7PO'/ Z E -mail: Phone: ..45— (30 Z7/ 7 Print Name: Signature: Address: 5 City, State, Zip: SST NC. tA3 \Nova E -mail: A• k a to rzg G Cis- Phone: - S -- 931, l o S . Print Name: „6ih L, I-(:rS c fti Signature: tw Address: 3 0 0 / 2 s > . - 4 , 4 L, City, State, Zip: bet4/, ( iiierWa (403 E -mail: jj Phone:41eN1 g PiIt§dr9 sated by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 405 of 465 Weal -nat 11 s Date: (7 10 / Z 0 /3 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese; and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Print Name: /EN A/04 f/o40kfek • Signature: J City, State, Zip: At ri t' reos� Address: 06/f !t• /66 r "jf E -mail: /N /Cape Coot A /(( Phone: (//j- )fig -Alto Print Name: Signature: �'I /�ww v six �9 Address: / ./-e.> g • i_f ( `,� City, State, Zip: A/4/4 f" .b i ) h74 E -mail: Of, /A Phone: z 4- -t 3 <9 ire .fre via t-- Print Name :, , ty,-Es -7q'! Signature: A Address: l 'a-70Q 3 / 5+ SE City, State, Zip: u$ u R,J `i8 a 9a E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: \ k cc Address:a_7 , .3/7.21 S4- City, State, Zip:Aa V ,Zn Wa gd7P- E -mail: Phone: Print Name. Cxa * \S� acC_- [..r._s,. Signature Address: s(2.14 61,,t1‘ City, State, Zip: ;rnA _ 4j R °V1,40ic E -mail: Phone: ,763 ` y -) - L (i„ Print Name: s cz h t_ lets Address: d./6 S fl $ i E -mail: Signature: jet.i..24/7� �� City, State, Zip: re, G a wet p,se,40 1/; Phone: Print Name: S Signature: Address: l 5(( S � d,,Le. ty, State, Zip: ktrGorr sponsored by the American4'ietnamese War Memorial Alliance G E -mail: Phone: 36(4 g 7v )11-0 d. c9., Page 406 of 465 rim VGI Petition to Auburn City Council Wail that I-I ea(S Date: /f //Q / 2 o / 3 I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Print Name: '17 12-on Rohn` Signatur Address: 0E0,26 6a? ntiOScafi City, State, Zip: S w/9 E -mail: r e- rap ,, . a /1// 112,K 43,1 Phone: 22(, 9v 71 f6 Print Name etG k.. �rQ -f-� t Address: Signature: Print Nara Signature: City, State, Zip: t af S E -mail: l74- V Ai e vP t/ 9dLr7Phone :( <904) e. TN a C.K•10 u Vh ; Address: 15 g z 3- S4(,, P f_ z. Print Name: barti Signature* City, State, Zip: tivri`eyti ` �� q$14 E -mail: Q h hC �2�fx� (1Q 40 L CO M Phone: Address: 1U 15-56 I (o O e, --) E -mail: City, State, Zip: T ILL I'M (AJ ask °l rtt) Phone: Print Name. Signature: Address: 16132.s J 3d L City, State, Zip n L _ .�)4- ' uJV W E- mail:' -1 -It LL} Phone:42s) 4 2-2 — s+ 's- Print Name: Signature: Address: ibq; Z 5. "- /-0; City, State, Zip: 1[` n i ?§ba sponsored by the American - Vietnamese Wer. memorial Alliance E -mail: Phone: C_Zo Page 407 of 465 E -mail: :tbei L @Jess►► ki,,,�, ►cOKt_ tAA,IA mok 700 Phone: 3_ _ 1 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Optional Required Print Name: 1 ' Signature: Required n -74 i+ Address: ` 1410 Cj ; E -mail: j __ ���. r_lle..r_!��0.1_�( ll��__ y►_�_2t1_e�= 0.!x'1 City, State, Zip: 504.,_ } , - I 61222......_ Phone: 10 Address: la as 0 3? 3 City, State, Zip: Print Name: ra. f ;$ti S kYy r�r Signature: Address: lo (Q p 6 3 jyJ 0-- City, State, Zip: g GWvd d E -mail: p la I a. c e1..�� Phone: Print Name: Signature: equ/A Jw`') +�� 1 Address: /415oY 5*"Av< r City, State, Zip: --4 tea, Wh R� el yr E -mail: Phone: Print Name: 14,c /4-d/64. Address: xj , I4 4i 2 ,€' City, State, Zip:.'",r/�,d E -mail: Phone: R4AiPsponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Affiance Page 408 of 465 /114 &c rv+ Vefera..s M QMorca ( Ark. Wail That Need S Date: J� D, ► L4 ) Petition to Auburn City Council support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Address: d/A/r. Signature: City, State, Zip :Befe, 1, /it/ E -mail: Phone: x..53 -3/&' 193 Address: i /o3 s4)/ 1/ E -mail: City, State, Zip: JcA yt 0.76 4011/1— 6 Phone: z 6 6 -g 6 f203 Print Name: ckae!-_ Jelly, -t Signature Address: 7 ! } t./ // ze( fL. s . E- mail:Cclia t tuu1_k- 44W1aTiOAr �• �� dYs City, State, Zip: 446,, w& ?Po ?z_: Phone: As--2 str _�q7 Print Name: Signature: Address: za veou Ul f72444.4 E -mail: ty, State, Zip: " rA 60 14 Wx 7150 Phon(, 2,9 5-6 c j �(2 Address: /5/ r7 3� 7` City, State, Zip: RPeotiann sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance E -mail: Page 409 of 465 al cboita4SioNtrOcier Phone: E-11CI L-1 10 3c2(9 Wall Mast ete-41-r Date: 1\1111 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Print Name: Tta Address: 3q5 p cco E-mail: dLLl Signature: City, State, Zip: Poe: t% GVE.0 f'ia Address:11N- tq4k„,qt, City, State, Zip: fribeith,44, E-mail: a, one: c/.. n. 12 g 4)aboT, o-q Address: 214iip-Fote4.5i_ r i6k9t )y- E-mail: City, State, Zip: Aoloy f)t LOA- qic Phone: it z abate( deictruc4tk,G1494, (010 -5111 Print Name: Signature: Print Name: tvx i0joyi _oar, a De-mm.6 44,_ Signature' Address: '4V 44 LA,6 kJ ce 1=4-1 E-mail: City, State, Zip: A u vd 9 Phone: 1 4. 3 G rfi Address: City, State, Zip: Id 5 terepteigo (,21.3)553--(0cero mail: .of WhinGsponsored y the Ameticen-Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 410 of 465 vJvet t...k g ( T%evf' of ea4s Date ; Nov a°j 1 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese; and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Address: ] j�1 S � zG Z S E -mail: City, State, Zip: 14€ — L U � � Phone: /7(- 4a, Address: //57j)/,4 4 City, State, Zip: L ECG J-zu E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Coo., \-k-c\\.€; Signature: tA.A /? Address: ' Z?() /&' 1 E -mail: City, State, Zip: 4 A 1 Cre_ k u M C t Z ; Phone: Address:-45 -QG, ,c� 1\4t E- mail: tA5\z ? (smcx :N Phone: City; State, Zirpo,c & LZ W . qty iltlbr9sponsored by the Amoerican- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 411 of 465 v2T Wet _Ai(� plat hi-eats' Date: ""DU. 9 20(3 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers,of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Required Print Name:ya;. STI a(cke{_ Address: j,gyoi, S 31/..11, S4- Signature: V Q cbrawiz � City, State, Zip: 14 4.(4/69.,‘ W A- gc30g1- E -mail: c h e e! _[D_ av ie ►Y�� , Gd ►''� Phone: �s�3 -S f rl27� Address: Yet C 4 M./ 5/ (-I 5w City, State, Zip: (G, (ce i,.�oo d ,,,i /4, qx y3 E -mail: fa,Yv'10..3G i505/4,, 1.Crr Phone: ( q5G\ .70c vv Print Name: Cl /O1 ;ti cxs Signature:l7 cucpc. Address: ( /0( S I 7_% Yob% City, State, Zip: Se he..., q[ia\ T) ov E -mail: L ` Phone: g 043, - Z 4i c] - 5s --0 -s Print Name: , v._ll - Signature: 2 7a /17 S7' CT / Address: � �' -1 ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: n J /IA L At TriT / ; Phone: )-r / - F67 - yCf_i .� Print Name: Signature: 4w._],__ Address: 1112 Carl J ;b e. S)- City; State, Zip: , u gh , WA. 17f j3 E -mail: Phone: rtJ yi.-I +L (560) 7.51- 3z_8r *km, Coot ' g 'sponsored by the American -Vie War Memorde! Alliance Page 412 of 465 (,AJ41 1 771 ci' /ice' Date: Mal 13 Petition to Auburn City Council support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Signature: j 4. ca Address: City, State, Zip: 4, eft E -mail: Phone: iv---Taz Aci-c-A,. _ae7_47).!.. c-,-- Address:302.ya ,o4 ef ,� w � ; E -mail: c City, State, Zip: ciice 1,10fz IS P -c•Scot —? 7a-`c.,►t...cd4 f.,p,/ Phone: 206 213, /A zp--- Print Name: 2,Off Signature: Address: ; E-mail: 4L 057 -1e, S_ City, State, Zip: WOd C! Q �, k 9 lid Phone: 1 Print Name: Address: Signature: de-5,n M.U. . S City, State, Zip: yam cf/4 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: ; Address: E -mail: Signature: City, State, Zip: jr /4 M � W , 4802.4 Phone: Print Name: 74 k• ery 1.-14 Signatu Address: 1/ 3/1 ���� R �. E -mail: City, State, Zip: 1c E woo r) g yp 6 Phone: REED (Address: 5 03 Y1t C . {. E-mail: City, State, Zip: -r-ne ("JR. .1> W. Phone: sponsored bf the American - Vietnamese Wer Memorial Alliance eft:? Ve� Page 413 of 465 (*Jatt Thor &(caLr Date: N' , l$ Petition to Auburn City Council I support,the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required. Optional Print Name: 1/4§-t21,,,, Signature: . /4 ,1),,, "� Address: s- S. ? +, 7n f%IL ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: map/ ✓ot L t r 14/A hone: Print Name: c91PJSnu LL Address: lee 4!3 4 a ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: wh ice- i? i Phone: Address: 03_2i -) T1' Signature: Auk City, State, Zip: C/j (A b i n / . G.-d".k E -mail: r dqv/_ J arro Q I�IGfiS`r /u6T Phone: 3 .! 3615 -52 7 v 9X Print Name: Foy 41-1- Signatu Address: `t'O r 5 City, State, Zip: p of E -mail: � _ e v,, Lou . "Y-r -\ Phone: Print Name: eoce,tdosikail Signature: Address: t. ie a Li L A I 1:$ v E -mail: Y�wc dL slew_ 1 _? 2 l Y4 City, State, Zip: hone: �� use[ a��� k1 Y�- � "�v Print Name: is e [Address: _in State, -Zip: triL G Signature: , E -mall: co L& Phone: GcJa ho fc ' PetlJ Psponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 414 of 465 That tfeettS Date: Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Name' Signetu M74,1. yy2 Address: 0. a)x 3CO City, S ate, Zip: Signatur Print Namef 14 • CoAD434.../ Signature:, Print Name' Sign GY1 L Ke IJ4 qg 571 ss: Azil3d 4099//0,4 City, State, Zip: , Address: 6r -2 City, State, Zip: /3J . E-mail: Phone: q'o E-mail: gadicior,„46,44//4/j_ieat 444 Phone:_, .err4.7-7 E-mail: Phone: 2_53 -? 151 14543 Address: 373 23ea s City, State, Zip: dtkv,, Address: pp, se City, State, Zip: 46_40116"1„.„.. E-mail: es cotattieet..) Phone: ( Crtae( lev161/All Phone: ZA . • c-c, 7 Print Name: feto geol Address: t,oq 'y 56,.) 415f._4City, State, Zip: lititeGjoed tofr Signet E-mail: p4a4. Phone: Vip a VN,Vet (11't capti 0 rik) Print Name: Signature: Address: tti E-mall: A/74r City, State, Zip: 4.17, 14,Y3-- von Phone: 41,1( e4 64,4604-J REEttenn sponsored by the Amerken-Vietnamese War Memorial AillefIC8 Page 415 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial' in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Ewa Thy. ##L& Date: i'3OV% ct rani 3 Required Print Name: ofizr—e /fee914" Signature: `Address: f :77e7 : E -mail: State, Zip: / Phone: Print Name: R ()13 T rt.. 5 Ue,(1'Address: 30q j .1 Ili- .S f c r % Signature ' � £ ��G, City, State, Zip: S wv� 6.) 3 � � ; Phone: E -mail: Ay) Print Name: Address: E -mail: 02 Signature: f City, State, Zip: i Phone: Peg- CG S Print Name: Signature: G, O Y- r�►��ZJCa�(t�. Address: 15 l/Q 3 d I SW E -mail: City, State, Zip: re, tv arr rfrael Phone: R Print Name.' 1Address: j 3 / - r /1 Signatu : • - ; -City, State, Zip: �;f�e /� [.U/ r _ E -mail; Phone: s--3 815'aa Print Name: `• Signature: RE&-- z- itiAddress: ea6a rlj�•l, City, .State, Zip: n sponsored by the American- Vlatnamese War Memorial Alliance p) 3 { E -mail: Ul Q17l4 a (All hi. gyp1144 t A.V t; Vlh� ru hl L41 kit `f 8'&I2 Phone: Page 416 of 465 (J a t t 1i&I ( -beats Date: MN/ t'r ) 15 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring. American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required .Optional Address: OR 01 (I i,\10l -r\ VV Sp naii: City, State, Zip: A w1." -h IAA cortobone: -' Requi Print Name: L Signature: 4rtuti a n:ye- J Address: 6 36-14; fef 6f 6 - City, State, Zip: Wa �g5 73 E -mail. oar. (Iaakca7i.$ IGee tut, (. Phone: 7 - 3/.7- /6--/i Address: //0/ 020 61. City, State, Zip: N"Uli) tut Al l d_ 4 9)D J Print Name& Y\ Signature: Hafea Address: ;2. y(f / A%eii/, /llty. 4p f r f 19 U ou Itli 1tia City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone:2 3 7f ?0 gc Address: 9 pep-, tk Lso E -mail: ;ail it 1.1- 3cx ; City, State, Zip: _ �j ; Phone: Q�o ioG 22 ZG —G-91 • Print Name: V . k'6- lagli° Signet Address: S /63 / /OA Pt sir City, State, Zip: ,.big 6-1, IJA 9Soq� coa5 T � � l� E -mail: P001. COPA Phone: O77d) AS-- 5755 Address: `4 ; E -mail: City, State, Zip: T (4) „ 6-,v W4 ? 9 : I 0 ne: 25-3 _ 35/ -92 73 RESteon sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 417 of 465 IMvk (AJA. t t That 14e_als Date: ' kJ b 1 l 4.-4 1: Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Signature 1 ► l Address: 6 0 ILLY �c pct., ; E -mail: City, state, zip: (e' tn) ri 98 s a& Phone: a 53 a -19- 6553 art,t c e `Address: / s a si E-mail: Name: ; City, State, Zip c/ 1 }� p y c°��U�nrl 9 s� o Phone: b Print Name Signature. l�nY�..$1 r Address:c City, State, Zip: , ,I I_n q7)57 E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: e.5(c gri Address: 7 Vl0 Y'llict'? WA- City, State, Zip: 14{ A!C E -mail: Phone: � -- 6 5 3 Print Name: Signet A-.)/.3e il;,ve Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail Phone: Print N Signature: ._-- .14,,1fv„ a rJ Address: d x'04 jr 24.1,. E -mail: City, State, Zip: P wA 5(37 ' Phone: RE& sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Arrance Page 418 of 465 eck.(t Date: 11 0' 2018 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name:pew :10 _ (4e -e,-- Signature: Address: 16 dadey sit 5 -- City, State, Zip: L �/, 1j Z_3 E -mail: /4," 4‘, /k.+►a. r Phone: 04 U,1cf '0'74 Address: 7 'k) !T Ist City; State, Zip: pd rt ! p? E =mall: L C X77 / e Crj Phone: '-a-c 3 - 77v _ 7 .5"-.0 Address: L f��7 (Rim{ Lag ±_?_ City, State, Zip:/.. a t y LAI 4 ' 'So 3 Print Name: CytctA qlt(Z,a Signature: Address: 2.13 SO 31451-- ,tte- E -mail: City, State, Zip: e 'L Jim 041 - ggaj Phone: 3 _ g _boo 7 Print Name: r Signatu Address: 9457 if)Yaq City, State; Zip:et t'A. u►aG �f vv E -mail: Phone( Print Name• RA&y.Attit Address: 3.4g / , E -mail: A-l_A AA) 4 City, State, Zip: 4 b,I.A1 C4 ?god y Phone: Zr3- A rid R Eati an sponsored by the American- VieMamese War Memorial Alliance Page 419 of 465 Glatt That- ! {eats Date: ' Nov Oi t .2.012> Petition to Auburn City Council support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Require Print mer I ty Na; (4 Signatur,,�'..e: filch Optional Address: /4-5eg-j5 D—Ofr f( ,l* E -malt: t4Pif City, State, Zip: K a iiir j -/'g s 7' i Phone: D'- 1/504.227 Address: �`-�� 2 [ / City, State, Zip: E -mail: ‘1/1121 -c :N. Phone:'_ 6.3 1 Address: ( n 0-1- Phone: City, State, Zip: 11)QQ t8Cie Print Name: Ja+4J /i/A-kt/f V10, Address: (9l 704 Signature: igiL �• E -mail: ,fin 9 71 ! Y4 • [ea/`t City, State, Zip: IAA P t , cily75 Phone: 301- L q 33 Print Name: Signature: RE/39.10n sponsored d1 . Address: 3A ,,r`` City, State, Zip: ---(p,iANCI W Vt. cOL the Amedcen- Ifletnemese War Memorfsl Alliance . E -mail: op.... s 'C "VNXa Phone: :3 -- Page 420 of 465 Walt hat H t& Date: N i 0(-4I5 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Nam bcrr- ct L. 1.-‘0:31,1 Address: v2tiolgi 3I I uc S� E -mail: els -'t 010 go i yvi:\1d4 fic� Signatur e�'� � 1 City, State, Zip: 0.10frieNamji wOr ct Q2:1, ; Phone: 343 ca"g G 6,6 • Print Narne: Signature: Address: I q Q tc s zyl E -mail: ku4k City, State, Zip C r 1. ( ) Q 1ij /Phone: 2_92402) (`r koa al* Address: `'2Z' 222nd City, State, Zip: /1,.,, 4- L-/ E -mail: a ; /4,, p' to ,n �- '� J• Phone: 206 5-9$ $ - 7/44. Print Name: Signature: loatit-7 ocy, Address: 10 st4t{.4 _ 7-- City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Address: p r.. gQX • -y� ;Email: City, State, Zip:g 06,4,. s dale 111, 4 9 Sroc/ Print Name: Signature: Address: t( b e j E -mail: City, state, Zip: r A d W� 1a 7 Phone: S &' ?3 - t7fir Print Name AAAep Signatur /VAC)/ a Address: Opel NC4.•k /4 , b ... E -mail: itR/'L �sy eo City, Slate, Zip YC1f/1, ' rvR 9evs- Phone: _20c 377 /4":W RE atean sponsored by the American - Vietnamese war Memorial Alliance Page 421 of 465 Walt 77 q • !f e6el.r Date: N oV Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional !0 o s-470 011614.4./ ; E -mail: i 7)4 ei4 ekm fe74hone: 2' 9cey Required Print Name: Rt rA 14. Stt 1 ft K Address: Signature: City, State, Zip: /14--v Print Name: ce-s Signature�� Address: / ‘7a?/ 3 City, State, Zip: -�® E -mail: Phone: A5 "3- aC3-�8'� Print Name: tilc_ack,s2.v. 4... Signature: acc 7,44L_ -Z4/ �, / r Address: ` ; E -mail: • /l. n �_ Viz,- �.�` =� 3 City, State, Zip: 1I1/4x/y 4.4 gg_°°2 hone: Print Name: �.e.:52/ ),LL . 5A ' • Address: 3/0 e) f.. y �` ,9 2 3 Signature: ) Q99 � �1 City, State, Zip:eff.eX v Q 'c 2 E -mail: Phone: City, State, Zip: w 1 1 ' 'Phone: Vti vt)- vN REEttfien sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 422 of 465 1110 Vt,+ watt -rh‘ct Heals Date: MN , Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required ien_t#, Required Optional Print Name:A/ Signature: Address: // /..5; /0,415-74-- City, State, Zip: Address: // 1/14cMi City, State, z4-•1--„,let-A Fnz E-mail: norffilm, seze4aar-A,24: Phone y, 7e:22-2 E-mail: Phone: Print Name: Zcpc57-11( Signature: (.414j24 1 Address: eir .2.1t7 City, State, Zip: t,Ltege.C7 CA-7.4 i'FFZ/ E-mail: 0 e Tff ie-cr N' 77 2uf50-4 Phone: 3 3 76, 9-3 Print Nan:al-id...1E A2077/ Signet he-) 60-4-0 Address: 6,fe Az3 r • t itoe e- CRY, State, Zip: lee-44y -301 ?132/ E-mail: emeliti /17740.,119.7 phone:01,5,4 332-373 Print Name. Signature: ovi Address: t a sr City, State, Zip: e)•-/r-- 0-,(4 E-mail: Phone: q2 5- qi0.5- Z3 5 RESgeon sponsored by the American-Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 423 of 465 v Petition to Auburn City Council watt Th - 14 #.4.1.5 Date: p ?a,t CO, L i 3 I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: 1\01/1 . Address: 1,5 2.1 _ _ 17 fly C f ,'� e E -mail: Signature: -01/0,4A- �•I. r ; City, State, Zip: Aubt,n l � » ; Phone( 4) • Print Name: Signature: Address: I 5, City, State, Zips CADA.. cooli Address: u ios s Z‘44& ST- City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: E -mail: glow Phone: 7- -3- 44$ - G3Y r Print Name: Signature: I-kx bV�rf Address: 15z S 91.11-%4 E -mail: icelpricha yajt .cord City, State, Zip:Taco WA yy ; Phone: j -j 611_0 7zi Address/7f I/74/me L4P y,' ■Vt E -mail: City, State, Zi ea ngy rK Wil reme Phone:2U j'1 5 03, Pht N j /4-re City, State, Zip2i4-- 2 (A.,._ E -mail: City, State, Zi RES/tem sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance E- mail: � Phone: 9.45--_ x 7th rr� Page 424 of 465 tL7714Imo& Date: Ni sal I Gj Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required L Pb -564J Address: l rt.)? / G G� .�f ✓ c � � E -mail: • �Cily, State, Zip: ,l4 </ `t , C& 1 123Phone: Optional Print Name: Signature Address: % CI 9 S' p City, State, Zip: a5kd` acopta, 04 1040 E -mail: 31ZL.e i 5te t~ e1 -Lib" or /Qf c0 Phone: l 3 [ f` ` .- (.25f<' d Je'1 Print Name: Signature: k :Y Address:913115" 5 ) 5 City, State, Zip: k/1- E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: \ b L.1 S % Z 7�� � E- mail:. Q/4'i5li. City, State, Zip: &( 10A 4g55), Phone: City, State, Zip: E -mail: 047162 V1/1 41"--15- 1' 1 rz: 17/0114 Phone: W( -22-1 —4(01- RED. sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 425 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required wait Tit fle & Date: NIV 61 , *g--403 Required Optional Print Name: (11 r n vN w frijoki ha Address: btgr (64-0 170 rr Signature/ ink r ; City, State, Zip: f 4 (} %A E -mail: •-gtr4 / LW 7-,,cact Phone: C2-5- 3 113 z Y Print Name, Signature: Address: - ! r 4 t -r City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: 25 3— 651-- f cl U v Address: /3-k r 3 % M S City, State, Zip; E -mail: Phone: .2 4-3.1/4/5. 71.1(4y Print Name: P y J A _ e Address: 62.22z 9 City, State, Zip: /(j pt.,/,4 lJuo- Signature: E -mail: Phone: Print Name:.n! I Ll /Aim Signature: G„e L t �- Address: I709 /v1 PLC LA ,✓C E -mail: City, State, Zip: 0A144 / i Ki (JJ go 2 77 Phone: Print Name: in sloe 1 1 ,( Signature: ety/ Dye .. Address: //z1 4f C�.Zo .t.i E -mail: City, State, Zip: ap �i w„ t pp-pal 40 1 Phone: z5-g &s 2_ - 7; 3 R ESStn sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Mamoru! Alliance Page 426 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council Walt That Mee& Date: iN4N 0-1 4-015 I support the proposed Vietnam War' Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional ur 5-e Address: /34,0i St. 36511- cj- City, State, Zip: cirri tAJA W3092-- E-mail: Mili-Sciek g daft66 C-64-■ Phone: 25-3 - 34‘ 7. 2.17) Print Name: \\) Signature: Address: —2_ 51 (3 bc ef-0 C City, State, Zip: g (.118 IA 3 3 E-mail: Phone: z S3 q , VA1 vitk Address: 5615 9t-iit_ lot [)il .15 E-mail: City, State, Zip: Wit ()6kb5 Phone: iNO2-5-4t°66fri3bi R E akten sponsored by the American-Vietnernese War Memorial Alliance Page 427 of 465 Address: 457 3,..te . E-mail: Actit za.4ee,Ac,i-opa.c., City, State, Zip:ak 92rt212! Phone: 37 Wall 7i44 heals Date: tiou Cr) , L I 3 Petition to Auburn City Council 4 cA r Vefe--(c..t .1- AA e„-et Pec, I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Address: #7)14 .vittrjet -?c_ 3E_ City, State, Zip: Optional Phone: :3 - Print Name: e. FM k Signature: Address: _Of J if- n64 City, State, Zip: 4""4 fitV° E-mail: rid lie-e.ca ,4a)/ L.01,01 Phone: ,770-- z 7i- 0 gey Print Name: Signature: Address: 2i' 2C2 / c. City, State, Zip:14e(„ot 4 IA/1,1- 7$ry 09 E-mail: Phone:a 5-3 - cr tf Address: City, State, Zip: Ca74,7144.4 N.1.14 E-mail: (445.6/44.6,1fas Phorie:,„_ 5 Iv_ is-A 7 IAAAJir Vet t/4 jrF Print Name: Signatur Print Name: Signature: lin it, Address: V: 3,e19 4/6, E-mail: ; Phone: City, State, Zip: RE &'n sponsored by the AmerfcarhVieMarnese War Memorial Al 11111WEI 5- Page 428 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese; and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional (()4f( 1 -6 / -leafs Date: 1 ?, Required Print Name: Ni-y* c3iiV Signature: Address: laws ce City, State, Zip Ss WIN °\ 72,1 E -mail: �Uisj O e' . i vYtl Phone: Print Name: !4 I`t ' ■igirSig Address: 506 FA4k City, State, Zip: �, r 'A *7002.1 Phone: a 5-3 -.3 .,2_6..g69a E -mail: Print Name: Signatur Address: co Q* t of e E -mail: City, State, Zip: '1,0,1 41k, -t '4 ft 7 B 11- 1 Phone: -1,5--23 9s5tt1 Print Name: Signature: o1 plc e 1 rn` Address: 450/1- 5 Z 4 e if City, State, Zip: Ta,c.okrto` E -mail: //ii cl C 2 e Qo I, Coil. Phone: Print Name: o� Address: Signature: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Petrbon sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 429 of 465 A &A !'N I%Ct l a�S /n ° r Air: (t a all Thai !� Date: 24 Petition to Auburn City Council 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: N,.b o \d rye Signature: Address: • City, State, Zip: V` u1 Y L W A E -mail: Phone: Address: /07 We.- 9 ue ; City, State, Zip: E h M fir: [a w/ 1../A gfka2z ; Phone: E -mail: -- 3/4?cC G a, /. c Print Name:' /i # s - jr-466. Signature: Address: N.2.5:., .7p tile E -mail: et7y'%t(�'' Ur a 40/ CO 1 City, State, Zip: gt/euid zejA 4o3 / ; Phone: 253) ? yc_bzzg Print Name: fQi'1 ;4C ?OW€ Signature: Address: y,2D5 f 44,1LOn City, State, Zip: A,41A w E -mail: colt," Wer8e 3iyact,r • C 1 Phone: Asa 67 a - $10/4 Address: 141p'S,4 p ; City, State, Zip: AlAi3vItki tQ cr Print Name: oveat' \ O- Address: +100 2 5 Signature: City, State, Zip: ice% E -mail: y' r -f hrrmA t 1., ► CbM LitS1 Phone: 3 3� 444 eigo° I E -mail: r r iNb T►'O4` ;Phone: 74 (Q 730 Set ° Cirre- RE &Ifgn sponsored by Me American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 430 of 465 1.00%. a•. OM 1't1 t its WI Walt 7he•1‘"e1e ec Date: NI t V Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Li r h` C� r�� j.! ; Address: 1438 Ai .0 c 1116 AC 51 i E -mail: e4 (p VL'.- i State, Zip: Ascon)Q WQ cf g 4Q fc Signature:: Phone: t.i t-to Print Name: : Address: od ma: i�i(A/11 e001 _ e .v Ineirod16 E-mail: efaa,441/ & 6/1, ,e e'er Signature: City, State, Zip: e00.7,4vO9-- i Phone: Print Name: 419 yr A/MA11 Signature: a Address: �" a 3 76-913 City, State, Zip: Ca vin 6-704 9042 . E -mail: Phone: 2 t?‘ - -7 72 - 5yC79 Print Name: Signature 11r. Address: 'T 6.2j _ 7- Ave, City, State, Zip: 1),111' P y41 c -Pt M t( % A`i6? E -mail: Phone: 2 3._5GS -3326 Address: / L/ 3p 6 pi 4 l n E -mail: City, State, Zip: n k iN A) 11-)14 •�'�� Phone: cLp!(n tG 11-re<14 CGt•�.. Print Name: Address: {5 69,--7 PL. 5 E- mail:c)� (�� iC Lt L5-8 Signature: State, Zip- 4C CD.10/w)d J) 0141 tif 0_one: 2' , :3g % - i yxffeo s3 REeti®n sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 431 of 465 i✓J41j That (4 eoa� Is Date: JN !J�, Lott Petition to Auburn City Council We support the proposed American - Vietnamese War Memorial at Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. Required _ Required optional. Print Name: Eck, Lkz Address: 2q 711 33� Auq. S E -mail: 'rL USW�tq .crw n� Signature: a' �$ R624. City, State, Zip: i_,tri, L› ..%A ct%c'O Phone: Zoto -(o5 3- 7(,∎4 Phone: a 5-3 _ g(s- - g 6 z Print Name: -0 �,�r Address: ,D / C,/(r S (v }.D to E -mail: Signature: C) � R624. LiJ� , Aide , City, State, Zip: re (fere, I bd Phone: a 5-3 _ g(s- - g 6 z Print Name: 3�,p fly we yiv� Address: .2/ ‘,/‘ S"�. z�76 c S- E -mail: Address: pW % S.1.,5 L. ��� qV 1C� Signature: 9 T w e , City, State, Zip:il{ LiJ� , Aide , Phone: 2_53 _ 5, j s -� 2 J Print Name: I` Address: 2�eC, ■ �%-p-(; Address: pW % S.1.,5 L. ��� qV 1C� E -mail: Phone: Z �-392, 2� C ity, State, Zip: Aob( Signature: 1 , h • 5q 6 9 City, State, Zip: Print Name: bra d &Wen. Address: 51/1-1" hie 5je, Address: 2�eC, ■ �%-p-(; E -mail: gekAren I_ 17\ Dx,(5.AVAille _ �� Signature: caZ___,.. Signature: cireee,..,e3f..._- C ity, State, Zip: Aob( lac j I- Phone: 26 j- ,35 5q 6 9 Print Name: ��L1T 1� �� Address: 2�eC, ■ �%-p-(; E- mail: gekAren I_ 17\ Dx,(5.AVAille _ �� Signature: caZ___,.. City, State, Zip: Pb � uR 6Z Phone: ZS� - Print Name: �bp i o j Address: Lf d b ,Lj ' I ,G s • E -mail: C 1 bo i y.100 jive , Cool G�-73 Signature: City, State,Zip: din Phone: Z 3 5 -1-q S4� RES.G Page 432 of 465 VNvtt Petition to Auburn City Council W all That ti Pmt (s Date: Na i off? , I �1 1 support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: Signature: rimes *c■ke, Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: City, State, Zip: Print Name 5 P.m_ D idcest. o /b Signatuyfr: ,44.0-4„ Address: dolt C41 -y'" City, State, Zip lvd- go? E- mail:e0, , Phonec5v -57S 7 Print Name: ft oir/ cetur/'to /1 ; Address: 1,3 a tea- - V/ 4n, E -maii: Signature: /d- 4 City, State, Zipvto X ynji7 J -Q'{S3 ; Phone: Print Name: R,` CetGiA..) Signature: Address: C ('�,, e) Line. E -mail: yv,ri City, State, Zip: IVO1,011/4 Phone: Print Name: Signature: /1 4/91,v,41( A/a64-1_ Address: JzgTc7 /Z 7 /4K /- City, State, Zip: /Op, L, / /rte Iv"( ,g 571 R EEOnE)n sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance E- mail: . Phone: Page 433 of 465 vw v- vd vet Watt Tt'c4f (1ect( g Date: �oV 0- • Lo 1 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Optional Required Required Print Name: Signature! Address: 100 City, State, Zip: E -mail: 5 K&i {'t�.lC�de c *k- j M Phone: 141'1 c IL Address: v .,0 <' z t City, State, Zip: L C,1 coef E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: ,549 51 37b eLsidCity, State, Zip:. V E -mail: Phone: Print Name: M� Signature: City, State, Zip: E- maif:-, ,5 I1tLJ' QcCX!!r! 77 , Phone 9 rVP' 77 vlJvc*. V4 "tea um yd.- Print Name: (y r Signatur 1 i Addressi '�1�� - ]85411...1 City, State, Zip: to..6_„.189pG l -qt3q 1 E -mail: Phone: ordZmernel t l.Cow. as-3- 8-63-5Q 16 Print Name: Signature: Address: ofa l 1cP3ni Ave .E • . E -mail Se City, State, Zip: fr-o1 Q. Tappcwit911; Phone:��� R ES tem sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 434 of 465 'Cotol• C_otri 5 --521A J Wait That 1464,4" Date: ON/ 2 . Lc? I Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Print Name: 13 1.414 Signature: `( j Address: 1 307 (2 t 1->r. ' City, State, Zip: L 4c. t 0 w q gs o E -mail: � t. -, 3 wi L, i P t . oo . � w Phone: -IL c4.'I s 31(D Print Name: Mfci+A.L k signatureyd 4 i Address: 4900 t1 /2-Li City, State, Zip:�1 E -mail: irtjJ M rroi ik iaaf Phone: AS 3 - 4 - Print Name: rq A) Signature: Address /logy .6 , e.- , As 0a City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: -0; Print Name: IV/ Of, 11 Signature: Address: 30 - I _ abt ..5 - .) City, State, Zip: 4' E -mail: Phone: Print Name7� i r Signature: Address: a7 a if G. lac) r7, -Ve sir City, State, Zip :geojt- l/ 1693 a E -mail: Phone: 'vG 1 31'45- Address: 3 / / 0 / ' S D pL,Sc E -mail: City, State, Zip: 1-1,,/c. !' '^da A Phone: Address: 15306 1 10'ft^ Ave a5-S� E -mail: City, State, _Zip: G�altc.1 w'A etta -7 Phone: as/ - 691-3!71. Petition sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance RES.G . Page 435 of 465 ■NVt* Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Optional Wall That lea!$, Date: N4 f t - oi3 - Required Print Name: 1 j T C. e Signature: Address: DI 1$t 51- SG City, State, Zip: i>0 gfjL1.)p U/A i 7Lt E -mail: pOWFlips q4y -c7 Cater Phone: 02_53 se/ / -e Address: Z 8 �ia ,e i -il /2)) ; E -mail: �/ ►e e ec�,,„.7Tar% ,,,r City, State, Zip: 4 _% 4 Goa ; Phone: 5-q9 - 6 2. S y Print Name: . Signature Address: /„.3.),..37. L) east City, State, Zip: 4u 5 JA 9 /7g E- mail: 0� 41%10412.0 e...) q "', wit V 1 vLt JJ Phone:c,20 9/ 05103 Print Name:6 V VLF. f Signature: AgleMgldress: 1j (� u ,� '4 - „ E -mail: 4L�- -4. ere" _ / y I - �� ' L '' ity, State, Zip: 5q e... f(44610(. -ter 4 Phone: 3 Ea Print Name: Signature: i ; Address: ! Gv E -mail: ,e,pe � City, State, Zip: 40,4{/ Phone: i�`3- 9 3 Print Name: Signature: Address3L • City, State, Zip: ►y� ,0 4442 E -mail: b#0iftepi » dkQ 4 off.!, Phone: R EEet n sponsored by the American-Vietnamese war Memorial Alliance Page 436 of 465 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, SouthVietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required optional watt Mad- Meats Date: 1\61 c ' f o 13 Required Print Name: (Address:SS536 . rrS j siA) E= mail:( ` vege3q Cily, State, Zip'e 8er��� Signatu Print Name: Signature: Addre sCd Phone:.9 53-133 - - /en7,z_ E -mail: City, State, 5 A'; Phone: ts. 4,,tre S Address: Vie, 3 y �� r° n. .S E E -mail: City, State, Zip:/ /J QrL �gq ne. 5:23- r3,2 el 7 3 Address: /(,'L/ as/-_ -. /7 L,/ City, State, Zip: d c%C]vcn 1+/4 98001 E -mail: Phone: „;53-29/9 S7 Print Name: Signature: Address: / 1/ D51- - 1c1. uJ. ; E -mail: 5 P -rca. r,- y'/5� . C011/1 City, State, Zip: RiAbi* c -i,,.r tAi A- -1 J Phone: Z 5 3 - Z t/ 9 - S 7(0 7 Print Name: Signature: 11V Wm_ ,YVA (MAP^ Address: 1 1 r 5c 119711 6r , E -mail: ecru CC , q l A City, State, Zip: Phone: r-.z?- r47-113 R Eetan sponsored by the American- Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Page 437 of 465 Wart 17-h ( -4 eas.LS Date: l'iad v 8 2 0/-3 Petition to Auburn City Council I support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War, Required Optional Address: Z z_9(6, 7 z_9(6, l(1. „o S, City, State, Zip: K e{ k ti laj{r. . 0 50 E -mail: rci Z, 0,K Phone: -Lciza +- f Y b q Z`7 (0 GT) ,( fr Print Name: l204v4 Signature: ,t/ Address: 7e/c/ • 12- L pG s City, State, Zip: v - wcf.-s y-�� to- 58'05.4 E -mail: Y�pv 91/ Q 77'4,/.ii fL o moo, Phone: yz 3 9 767 38'7/ Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Address: Signature: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Address: Signature: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: RE&4 n sponsored by the American- Vetnamese Wer Mernortef Affiance Page 438 of 465 Auburn Vetemss Atte-04 Par l< Osal That ikDate: WSJ 01 t Obi 131 Petition to Auburn City Council support the proposed Vietnam War Memorial in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War. Required Required Optional Address:, 7/ 7 & IT S� ; IlJ 4✓ E -el il: ig/t ems o Ft, 7 x o ,C City, State, Zip: ~n f J dd� - Print Name: Address: Signature: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Signature: Address: City, State, Zip: E -mail: Phone: Print Name: Address: E -mail: Signature: City, State, Zip: Phone: Print Name: Address: E -mail: Signature: City, State, Zip: Phone: Print Name: Address: E -mail: Signature: City, State, Zip: Phone: Print Name: Address: E -mail: Signature: City, State, Zip: Phone: Petition sponsored by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance RES.G Page 439 of 465 oD1 t k (704te Illff&, a,'t a,rd Vetfta &s& /(/aw / lff01€ a/ CONIffitt&& Mission Statement The Joint American Vietnamese War Memorial Committee is an organization comprised of volunteers from several veterans' communities. We are seeking to establish closer relationships through partnering of veterans and families affected by the Vietnam War with a series of projects intended to bring healing and education. The committee is to be a non - profit group from the Seattle- Tacoma - Auburn communities, formed to establish a greater organization for all veterans, families, organizations touched by that conflict. The first effort is to be the building of memorial statue expressing gratitude to the sacrifices of American and Vietnamese allied veterans now living in Washington State. Further projects and social events are to be planed within the same guideline of uniting our communities bound together as allies of that war, with the simple theme, "We are American and veterans." Steering Committee Lan and Allen Jones, co- chair, Vietnamese community veterans Peggy Caudill, co- chair, Native American community veterans Thom Stoddert, co- chair, American born veterans Thai Phan, treasurer Sandie Dolge, advisor Jason Tran, engineer, designer Chuyen Nguyen, advisor Anthony Ton, advisor Vansang Allen, advisor RES.G Page 440 of 465 / 11///%/ 1i-1AN YO(JJ I/ GI V CITY OF AUBURN Monuments, Memorials and Structures to be placed on City property Thank you for your interest in placing a Monument, Memorial or Structure on property owned by the City of Auburn. Auburn City Ordinance 6480 addresses the criteria to be applied for consideration of such. Auburn City Code 2.97.010- 2.97.090 defines the process for considering requests for the placement of Monuments, Memorials and Structures. Please review the Auburn City Code and provide the following information in an effort to communicate the design and goals of the project. Date: November 14, 2013 Key Contact: Lan Phan Jones & Thomas Stoddert — representing the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance Address: 1445 Ridgeview Loop SW City: Tumwater State: Washington Zip: 98512 Home Phone: 360- 357 -7684 Email Address: ahjones@a,comcast.net Work (Daytime) Phone: 360 -870 -3099 In an effort to initiate conversation related to your proposed project please answer the questions on the following page. RES.G City of Auburn' 25 West Main Street 1 Auburn, WA 98001 1 www.auburnwa.gov Page 441 of 465 Monuments, Memorials and Structures to be placed on City of Auburn Property Please describe your intended Project? We propose to construct a memorial honoring American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers of the Vietnam War in Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park. • The monument consists of a cement base and pedestal supporting a statue, two flag poles, and a plaque. • The statue features three figures: An American soldier, a South Vietnamese Soldier and a Vietnamese nurse. • Two flagpoles display the US flag and the Vietnamese Freedom and Heritage flag. The US flag would fly higher than the Freedom and Heritage flag in compliance with standard protocol. • Inscriptions in English and Vietnamese are etched in granite stone expressing gratitude to the American, South Vietnamese, and Allied soldiers who fought in the Vietnam War. Between the inscriptions an image of a mourning soldier is also etched in granite. • The memorial may also display interpretive and educational material relating to the Vietnam War etched in enamel or another durable medium. A picture of a scale model of the memorial is provided in ATTACHMENT A. Design specifications from the approved City of Auburn building permit are provided in ATTACHMENTS B and C. What is the address and location of your proposed project? (please include map and area where monument, memorial or structure is to be placed) The proposed site of the monument is Auburn's Veterans Memorial Park, the entrance of which is on E Street NE and Park Avenue. The monument would be placed in the park directly west of the William C. Warren Building. Placement is shown on the aerial photograph included here as ATTACHMENT D. How will your proposed Civic monument, memorial and building celebrate the history of the Auburn community? The monument commemorates the community's involvement in the Vietnam War and its lasting impacts: • Between 1964 and 1973 hundreds of Auburn residents, thousands of Washington residents, and millions of US residents served in Vietnam. Many were killed or wounded. The memorial provides a place for families and friends to visit to honor their heroism and mourn their loss. • The Vietnam War divided Americans in a manner not seen since the Civil War. The community and nation were painfully torn between the desire to defend freedom and democracy by stopping the spread of Communism in Southeast Asia and the desire to stop the loss of life as the war dragged on and casualties grew. Opposition to the war eventually led to withdrawal of American support for South Vietnam in 1973 and collapse of South Vietnam to Communist forces in 1975. Anti -war sentiment in the press and the community made returning veterans feel unappreciated. Many returning veterans faced open hostility for their service, which made re -entry to civilian life more difficult. Many Vietnam veterans are still dealing with bitter feelings and post- traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). For surviving Vietnam veterans, the memorial provides a belated "Thank You." It recognizes their sacrifices, honors their service, and provides a place of healing and respect. The memorial helps heal the rift of pro -war and anti -war opinion and unites the community in acknowledging that the Vietnam veterans deserve the same recognition and respect as other veterans. RES.G City of Auburn' 25 West Main Street 1 Auburn, WA 98001 1 www.auburnwa.gov Page 442 of 465 • The fall of South Vietnam to communism in 1975 began a flood or emigration from South Vietnam to the US and other countries around the world. "Boat people" fled for their lives often perishing at sea. South Vietnamese soldiers remaining in Vietnam faced years of imprisonment in communist "re- education camps" while their families lost their property, livelihood, and freedoms. Waves of immigrants came to Auburn and other US cities as South Vietnamese escaped with only their lives. Later in the late 1980s and early 1990s, more immigrants came as part of the "Humanitarian Operation" which allowed South Vietnamese soldiers to leave Vietnam legally with their families. Most Vietnamese in Auburn are families and relatives of South Vietnamese soldiers. The proposed memorial acknowledges Auburn's Vietnamese refugee community and recognizes their heritage as defenders of freedom and democracy. The memorial displays the Vietnamese Freedom and Heritage Flag (the yellow flag with three red stripes) which was recognized by a Mayor's proclamation in October 2010 as the official flag of the Vietnamese - American community. Displaying this flag at the memorial respects their history, restores their pride, and breaks down racial and cultural barriers to unify the Auburn community. • Auburn has a proud history of honoring veterans by: hosting the Veterans Day parade; hosting the traveling Vietnam War "Wall that Heals" and dedicating a park to Veterans. The proposed memorial builds on that tradition. Vietnam War veterans are the largest surviving group of veterans from any foreign war. They are aging and dying off, often the result of war wounds, exposure to Agent Orange, PTSD, and other war related afflictions. Now is the time to build a memorial to honor their sacrifices and show community support before it is too late. How will your project enhance the beauty of the area around it? The memorial makes a beautiful addition to the Veterans Memorial Park. It is designed by a professional engineer /architect and the design has been reviewed and approved by the City of Auburn Building Department. A model of the proposed memorial is pictured in attachment A. What is the significance of your project to potential visitors? When complete, the memorial will be one of five joint memorials of its kind in the United States and the only one in the Northwest. By recognizing the South Vietnamese and displaying their Freedom and Heritage flag, the memorial goes beyond mourning the Vietnam War dead. It affirms the valid and noble purpose of the Vietnam conflict: America's support of aspirations for freedom and democracy around the world and resistance to armed aggression. American Vietnam War veterans visiting the memorial will feel honored for their service and will receive the thanks for their service that has been denied them for far too long. For many, the memorial will be a place of healing and affirmation in their final years. For their children and future generations the memorial provides a place to remember and honor Vietnam War veterans for their service. South Vietnamese visiting the memorial will feel understood and honored by their neighbors. Display of the Freedom and Heritage flag shows that Americans recognize South Vietnamese as allies and brothers in arms in the struggle for freedom and democracy. South Vietnamese will also come to the memorial to honor their war dead and pass on their history and values to their American -born descendents. How will your project positively impact the community? The Auburn community benefits in many ways from the proposed memorial: • Giving over -due recognition and respect to Vietnam veterans and their families; • Restoring pride and honor South Vietnamese veterans and their families and helping the Vietnamese refugee community feel accepted and understood in Auburn; • Bringing tourism to the city as the memorial attracts pilgrims from around the state and across the nation; RES.G City of Auburn' 25 West Main Street 1 Auburn, WA 98001 1 www.auburnwa.gov Page 443 of 465 • Providing a place for commemorative events and gatherings; and • Helping to educate students and the community about history and the struggle for freedom and democracy world -wide. How will your project be funded? What is the plan for maintenance? Construction of the memorial will be funded by private contributions and fundraising by the American - Vietnamese War Memorial Alliance. Some labor for the construction will be donated at no cost. The Alliance is also committed to supporting on -going maintenance of the memorial in cooperation with the City of Auburn staff. Details of the maintenance responsibilities will be worked out with City officials. The Mayor or his or her designee will provide initial screening of the proposal to ensure it complies with the provisions of ACC 2.97. Please review Chapter 2.97.060 and 2.97.070 related to the review process and criteria. RES.G City of Auburn' 25 West Main Street 1 Auburn, WA 98001 1 www.auburnwa.gov Page 444 of 465 WA S I' I ; r AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5014 Department: Attachments: Planning and Development Res 5014 and Attachments Administrative Recommendation: City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5014 Background Summary: See attached Resolution No. 5014 and background materials. Reviewed by Council Committees: Finance, Planning And Community Development Councilmember: Backus Staff: Meeting Date: December 2, 2013 Item Number: Date: November 26, 2013 Budget Impact: $0 RES.H AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Tate RES.H Page 445 of 465 RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 1 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN WASHINGTON RELATED TO DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXTEND THE TERM OF A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT W ITH CERADIMM, LLC AND THE TERM OF AN OPTION TO PURCHASE REAL PROPERTY WITH CERAD1MM, LLC, BOTH APPROVED BY ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION 4675, AND TO EXTEND THE TERM OF AN EXCLUSIVE LEASE OR SALE LISTING AGREEMENT WITH COLDWELL BANKER DANFORTH AND ASSOCIATES UNTIL DECEMBER 31, 2015 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, previously entered into a Master Development Agreement with Alpert International LLLP for development of properties belonging to the City and assistance in development proposals for other neighboring properties in the downtown area, and WHEREAS, that initial Master Development Agreement expired and the City entered into a subsequent refined Master Development Agreement with Alpert International LLLP following the Council's passage of Resolution No. 4663, and WHEREAS, Alpert International LLLP combined its operations with Ceradimm, LLC, and the City approved a revised agreement and an option to purchase property by adoption of Resolution 4675, and WHEREAS, the City entered into an exclusive listing agreement on August 12, 2012, with Coldwell Banker Danforth and Associates for the lease or sale of agreement within the Downtown Development Area, and, WHEREAS, the City Council believes that extending all of these agreements will facilitate downtown development, and that it is in the best interest of the City to extend these agreements until December 31, 2015, NOW THEREFORE, IN LIGHT OF THE ABOVE FINDINGS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows. Section 1. That the Mayor of the City of Auburn and the Auburn City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute amendments extending the termination date until December 31, 2015, for the Memorandum of Agreement, which Agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and the Option to Purchase Real Property with Ceradimm, LLC, attached hereto as Exhibit "B ", and the Resolution No 5014 November 26, 2013 Page 1 of 2 RES.H Page 446 of 465 Exclusive Lease or Sale Listing Agreement with Co!dwell Banker Danforth and Associates, attached hereto as Exhibit "C ", all of which are incorporated herein by reference Section 2. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon Dated and Signed this day of , 2013 CITY OF AUBURN PETER B LEWIS, MAYOR ATTEST Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney Resolution No 5014 November 26, 2013 Page 2 of 2 RES.H Page 447 of 465 November 21, 2011 Exhibit "A" MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT Emma L. Alpert, Manager CERADIMM, LLC 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7100 Seattle, WA 98104 RE: City of Auburn Downtown Property Development Dear Ceradimm, LLC: This letter constitutes the Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) between the parties, replacing and superseding the Master Development Agreement entered into by and between the City of Auburn and Alpert International, dated December 20, 2010, and any other Agreements prior thereto. In addition to and contemporaneous with this MOA, the parties have entered into an Option Agreement whereby you have options to purchase certain parcels of real property of the City of Auburn. Your agreement to enter into this Agreement serves as the consideration for the Option Agreement. You agree to do the following: a. Market properties within Auburn Junction to prospective developers, tenants or third party interests. b. Assist the City in the development of marketing information and products for Auburn Junction. c. Work with the City and its listing agent in the direct marketing efforts of City properties. d. Assist the City in strategizing and planning for Auburn Junction. e. Assist the City in its coordination with private property owners in Auburn Junction and private property owners adjacent to Auburn Junction. f. Provide the City as requested or needed with updates to the Auburn Junction Conceptual Development Plan, Assist City staff as requested in presentations or communications to City Council or its committees, lh. Meet with City staff as requested to coordinate and strategizc on marketing and development for Auburn Junction. g. RES.H Page 448 of 4 5 If you choose not to exercise the Option Agreement — and the options to purchase the various parcels described therein -- this MOA contemplates that you would work with real estate professionals and developers to facilitate the development of the City owned parcels, and your compensation for those services would be from the real estate professionals and developers who develop or sell to developers City owned parcels. You agree that the City is not obligated under this Agreement to compensate you for any work you perform under this Agreement except for any transaction with Williams & Dame Development or its affiliate, in which event Ceradimm, LLC will be compensated for such work by either Williams & Dame or the City on terms similar to those approved by the City for real estate professionals, as referenced above. Additionally, if requested by the City, you shall assist and advise the City with the planning and potential third party funding for a cultural arts center or other public facility (collectively, the "Public Facility ") to be potentially developed independently, in conjunction with the development of City property or properties, or elsewhere in downtown Auburn. Should such Public Facility be so planned by December 31, 2013, and if such Public Facility is fully funded and developed by the City, you shall be entitled to a fee equal to 1.5% of the total capital costs ()latch Public Facility project, Please acknowledge your agreement to the above Memorandum of Agreement by signing this letter below and returning a copy to me, Thank you very much. Sincerely Peter 13. Lewis, Mayor Attest: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk CERADTMM, LLC Approve ns to F z' By D el , 1 eid, T y Attorney RES.H Emma L. Aljiert, Manager Date: Page 449 of 465 : eturn .Addrem AutiurnCitY City,of Auburn 25 WesttViain t. Auburn, WA 900 / Exhibit "B' 11111111111111111111111 20111227000172 ,'' Fr T AMERICAN P —001 OF 009 OPT 70.00 J/27/�1 047 • n,C' NG ouNTy, WA .s RDER'S.COVER SHEET Document Titlei(s)..(o(tranSact ons *orital6d,therein): II Option to Purchase Red:Property VPS„L.-ANT-. - • , ,; ;.. Reference Number(s) of Documents ilissibried oaeleaSedr... " °Additional reference #'s on page Ordc9imene ; a ' , ,,, : .,•,. Grantor(s)/pOrro,wer(s) (Last name first, then fir'gt fism.e and initials),„„ Auburn, CitY' of ."1 Grante0AssignSegliineficlary: (Last name first) 1. „Ceradimr,ri, LLC •: -"t Legal bescriptit!in.:'(abpreilate.a Ledot, block, plat or section, township, range) Lots 3 and 4 Block:., i'Own,ASlauOiter, iots.:1 and 2 Block 5, Town of Slaughter t. "4•'" v , , IN Additional legal is on page ,1. of doctiment. ■■ Assessor's Property Tax PirceyiCoOntNuMber 7815700240, 7815700225, 781570020, 7815700295, :781'5700290, 7815700285, 7815700300, 7815700505,18.157b0310,..7,816700325, 7815700326, 7815700327 ,• • • 0 Assessor Tax # not yet assigned RES.H 01(1,.0act.i.i71.0ntsieileltiottof: MOM as 'ernYacOmitvslott &Orly, , .. R nos not been:, exam'inifd.. es to ottpw omnuttork•ig, as to 0 t#IcoV .. ,.t. .: ., .',. .1". • ,„ .1 .... Page 450 of 465 Aqer Ftv:Cording, Rityin to: Aubuctetity;tlet)( 25 West Stieet •• • , Auburn, WA.Sift00 ,Thr 14' „. < 4. OPTio T9'Pvni(cuov REAL PROPERTY _ ,; THIS OPTION AGREEMENT (414reerninM is m'ade and gineied into this 5— day of 20 IN , by a.nd(:betWeen' the'''CITY,pr AIPU1N ,+';'a Washington municipal corporation (hereinafter "GRANTOR!) 3.hd pefadiniin, )14,q, 7o I ).7iflh Avenue, Suite 7100, Seattle, WA 98104, a Washington limited lihility cOMpani(hei'einaller.N5R_ANTEE"). ,. ,, „, , ,f. • FOR pooD, AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION4''THE SUFF,ICIENY (:),' vtifircH IS HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGED, THE PARTIEg"AGREEas , . 4., • ' •F g. ..' 1 a/ OPTION ; TO PURCHASE. The GRANTEE shall .have the right tp puichase the , City Own ed ?iirce0 identified as Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12,13 and 11:; inExhibit "A" & ''B'' ("City Ownet''shipAegat descriptions and map"), for the purchase Pelee; lease arrangements or other alternative ..,,tipanciar arrangements as determined below or 'enter info such other agreerpents'fOr thehnirehase, lease, alternative financial arrangements andik.development of said Citypwnedpar4ls ig shall be negotiated from time to time by the Parties. The term of this Option Agreement s,hallite Or a:per-i6d Ottirrie ending on December 31, 2013, which right may be assigned by the GRAIgt E;OOne or more assignees acceptable to the GRANTOR. For the purposes hereof, the, Mayor/of the' City Of iburn shall be authorized to approve such assignment(s) subject to ,approval by the Auburn City Council. It is provided, however, that as an alternative to the purchase pf Oiy:,owno Nivel% the parties may negotiate and execute agreements for long-term leases'pf said Oty Awned Parcels 2. PURCF1ASE PRICE OF Q1TY.'..PAIRCELS. During ,:tite,..term of this Option Agreement, the GRANTEE shall have the right tp..purOase th6 eity OiGecl'Parcels, collectively or individually, for the purchase price deterini4d throtighj•ihe process desObed below. The purchase price for the City Owned Parcels, alai with nyCity right-of-ry—that may be vacated, and rights pertaining to any City Owned.,iffarcels .tthiniatelY/includee:,in their development, shall be equitably negotiated in good faith by„the.,parties during thkterri) or this Option Agreement or any extension hereof, reflective of factors pertintrit to..their reaskinable...- valuation as determined as of the date of the execution of this AgreeMent, and based'oOlie value of the land only, as the Parties agree that any buildings or improvementshatiriadygxiSt on-the property are not of value to the intended development. .0 , .,.• ...:.. ..,: . N .r :' • .:' $' j. .."' RES•H Page 451 of 4 ‘‘. 1 S , i• . , Tile Parties further agree that if they are not able to successfully negotiate an agreed ! p,t&che price within sixty (60) calendar days from the date the GRANTEE exercises an option ,ti-) puithtiseor any parcel(s) covered by this Option, in order to ensure a fair purchase price for :„.../ the .64 OWned':Paricels and any other City-owned property rights associated therewith, the GRANTOR-may 'engage an independent MAI appraiser to determine the value of the City I;Etrcels, Which-valuation shall be the purchase price, except as set forth below. ' GRANIOR:Will.' provide the'MAI appiaRal to GRANTEE within thirty (30) calendar days of the en4.ofihe ,60-day negotiation];p0od. lt,the valuation of the GRANTOR's MAI appraiser is not accePtabl to,:the GRANTEgqihe G4NTEE'rnay engage an independent MAI appraiser to determine, the valuationiandynufst provt0e,:ft to.,94N,TOR within thirty (30) days of the receipt of GRANTOR'kariraisal, If the 9061.4TEW,s'lviAlippraiser determines a value that is within ten percent (10%)•of thekFtrnTOR'S-:MAI aPpraikr's value, the lower valuation shall be used as the purchase priCe' for the City OWned/PhOelsi If the difference in valuation exceeds ten percent (10%), the GRANTOR's MAI ,fippraiset aud ,thp GRAN'PE's MAI appraiser shall within thirty (30) calendar days of the dlernainatibaethat theia1uatiqn exceeds ten percent (10%) select a third MAI appraiser and the three,...appOiiers shalI deterrnine.lhe valuation within sixty (60) calendar days, and that valuati shah be the piirchase:pri0 to- the City Owned Parcels. Each party shall be responsible for the 'bos0 of il4 appraii&,Jand.?lhe„twoparties shall share, equally, in the Costs of the third appraiser. ..,. i ,■ ,I. i i' ." .:■■ i ' Alteffiatively, If the parties agree to pursue Iting4eir leasese•of sard-City 0-vvlicd,yarcels, including aireenient on. the length and terms of the leases,'as an alternative to and of the purchaseOale of the p4cels, if the parties cannot agree on tie 4rnoiffit. 6f lease;payenents, the parties shall iihipl9y a limilar strategy for determining valuation/Payment arno4its of the leases similar to the strategy descyihd above. Any other arrangements contemptatO by thiS Agreement shall be byinutual coriserii of tlieParties. '., • . • l,,,, . ,i' 1 :•,. ' V Arty such,..pachae or leak af_g.,.Lot on which a building or structure is located shall include the1011owing OqgfrerneutS: FirSh.. that all buildings or structures thereon shall be demolishedlremoved within niaety. (90).dayifollowing the purchase or lease and the issuance of all permit(s) for site development orfiuildi,r4coliStTetion, Provided that if no permit(s) for site development or buildiiig,catistrfiction has/hbeybeen issaed, then the all buildings or structures thereon shall be demolished/reinolk&within.'eighteer(1.8) months following the purchase or lease. The GRANTEE shall b. responsible for their demOlition/removal; Second, that the purchase and sale (or lease) agreeinenvihall contain''terns and ,e,oriditions requiring GRANTEE or its successor in interest to submit a complete,applieoion,for deVelopprient of the property within twelve months of the closing datp,. which;deyelopinent shall Provide that vertical construction shall begin no later than twenlY-'fo4r (VD :Months gler:the date the application is deemed complete .; • j . ' .., • . ..• If the buildings or structures thereon are not demolishOd/remoVed4ithirrqhe tithe-frame described above, or if either an application is not submitted within tWelve.montlis..,Of the closing- date, or vertical construction has not begun within twenty-four (24) mOntlis...of.thi date the , application is deemed complete, the sale/purchase or lease of said parcel(s) shal•.b voi'de'd; . rescinded, and nullified, and its title and/or possession shall automaticall.,„rvthi to the GRANTOR. Any purchase price paid to the GRANTOR shall be returned to the GRANTEE; RES.H ' Page 452 of 4 hoWever; GRANTEE shall not be entitled to any additional payments from the GRANTOR, inludiiig:hnt not limited to interest or development costs, and the property 0 ,r -1, j :For-the purposes hereof, including the Developer's Rights/Options to Purchase or Lease, asAleserihed,,hereip below, "City Owned Parcels" shall also include parcels located within the $,.. ..=,. ,f6untblo4 ar:ea bounded...by Main Street to the North, A Street SW to the West, 2nd Street .....,,,. ... .. , , , SW/SE...i to the South and A., Street,'SE`htp the East, that are subsequently purchased by the GO.,toltoft cluii4 theterm.:ofAhls Agjeement or any extension(s) thereof, and may include othei'l."Ouipar8e0" 1pcated within the tirea ctepletecl in Exhibit "B" (" Downtown Redevelopment Area") that .are ,ubs:CcitOntle'ptchase,cebyithe GRANTOR during the term of this Agreement or any extension(s)Ahert6f, piovided ,tht/City f:i4W .piarcels" shall not include parcels that may be purchased by theGROTOR withikthe ideiiti4elYtarget areas where the parcels are expressly purchased for municipal purpose. 1 3. RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL. InYaeldition td the terms Oove, the parties further agree that if the GRANTOR receives an aCeeelable, b9na, fide offe.r:Wpurchase any of the City Owned Parcels described herein during the teyin.of this AgreemOt,lhe GRANTEE shall have a right of first refusal to purchase said Cit5A-oy,ined p4cel(s). th he eitentAhe,GRANTOR desires to sell the Property to the OFFERER of such VOna Iid6-9fferjo pnr*se, th8hthe GRANTOR shall so notify GRANTEE in writing, specifying tf* piopOsed ilretieily `ip.ddrOSs /4nd/or description, he sale price and all other material lemi'S arid cOnditiCifir.of'the/p4o0d sale, together with a ckipy of the bona fide offer to purchase. e' a • ., a‘ a' it :: • 1:, ,e, ' .• , ,• . , :; , ,... Iti the'event GRANTEE elects to exercise such right of first refus4 anti purchase said ,,,. parce4), GOANTEE ,hall,..notify the GRANTOR of such intention, iin6 shall meMorialize the same,,:in adeernent dsneptiients executed and delivered to the GRANTOR Within thirty (30) days of GR,ANTOR's notie.6 to GRANTEE of thu bona fide offer to purchase, ma. GRANTOR shall then sell,.;said parge1() tqtRksitEEp.n.the terms of such bona fide offer to purchase. If such bona fideeoffetio purch4Se ificlu4s,non-nibnetary terms or conditions that cannot reasonably be satisfied by GRAN'TEE..(s1ichon4 the,.provion of exchange property or other non-monetary consideration), GRANTEE pia$ prdvicte, c0h0 consideration in lieu of such non-monetary conditions. In the event GRANTEE 'does not.,exeicisu such right gfirst refusal within the thirty (30) day time period specified above, 'then .the GRANTOR shalVbe fralo, sell the parcel(s) in strict accordance with the terms of the bona tido;,offei,tot)ureha$e (without 44).endment thereto) to the buyer stated therein, If GRANTOR does not conclud9-suCh sale, then GRANTEE's right of first refusal shall apply to all future bona fide offeriA4pur)ChOe stieh rc0(9. • „,. RES.H Page 453 of 45 .'' ,, .. .,.. ,• .,, .. :- 1:1■1 WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by •• ,. their authorized representatives on the date first above written. LLC By RES.H RANTO .Ema,L. A ert, Ivitinagq • 4 Peter 13. Lewis, ayor AtteJ4 ,'"'3' 3 3, • ,,,■•• ,1,6, • s „.. Dariielte Daskam, City Clerk pci .t, .:. .:. ;.. d. :''' /Appi Oed a,s•to Form: ' ...,..' ., .:. I: r •i.. ,n4 • .... n7.• • • Attorrieyo"-',. 1.• :I • 1 Page 454 of 465 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) .. , ... ) ss .. , ObU-Vii 6F.' KING ) / :' ,On tli.IS- a lie' day of VY 4'41-1 .ZW-. , 20 0, before me, the undersigned, a No,14m.Publi,c in ad for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared 1?,e`ter,ti. Lewi'l, and Danielle. Daskam, to me known as the Mayor and City Clerk, for the City of Auburn, Who„executed the,within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to beihe free and iroluntlrY at and deed of said municipal corporation, for the uses and purposes tOreIn . nientioiied; and oli'lbatitestited that they are authorized to execute said instrument on behalf of said Municiptil colpor4iNtri' ' .. •" .//'-i 1 ,'".„,.• . , GEV EN Undery hated ad oftickseal this . day of 011,0v-p4,4,--- 20 , _,.. ,,‘, 017/1.- ':, .................. i '4,,. ;.,;. .:%. 1, 341E ii-of + .. t . ,. 014......et, RES.H „- 7 o• / "'' /NAME ow ' ' , ... ; • : j'7 t 4. '41:1,•-• • *CIIII30° .: % 5•40, 3 13 0 g :' NOTARY PU8LIC idandlor the State of / th -20 ,6",..l■ - . 4Wahin4ton, residing at .„i' . ''',41,e--, •,,,,, ,.., Ne WOO My .(omiiiiSSion EipireS: .;::: 6 ,,...vv_Lg • /3' / '.'" STATE OF YirASHINGtON ) COUNTY:tit.: KING„ ;, ) ON 'HIS. 5 .?' dtly of De Lte-i."Ave/— , 20 1 t , betait'lne,/ personally appeared rrovitts 1-11 iwrid-_:„....7.----- , to me known to be tfie:,,,litvx.4. ycie—e-- and • ,, , :. .,' for Ceradimm, LLC, the company on whose behalf 11 . . feyvbxecuted the . ... , within 'and foregoing ilistrunient'i an acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deecrof,,said coMpapy, fOr the psertind purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he21they is/are authorized tdexeit0 said instrument on behalf of said company. i 4., ....,,::-- GIVEN under My hand,•inctoffiidial Seal this .t.5 day of Der-e-w% b e— , 20 t l. . .. . ,,i; g., , ,...,,,„nv :. le „ ,. ,r .. • GLORIN.WALTO t Notary Public, State of Nowyoticj QUallfied In KIriOS,P.GILAY No. MA01482(34 My Commission Exoiroo Juno 26';:•2014 TNIAIA)3. „. NOVARy POBLIE in,and,for. the State of ApetZ(-40xlc-- vitectilikatertg; My Commissid; Expires Z .31;11 „ , • I•.. !".• .k/ • , , • .• ,,- . . iF '.:,-i ,i' .• .• .0 •, 0 0 • • j'. •j , I • , 0 ...II, . , ,.t1'' ,•:' ..1 0 r.1.1 •11 • 1.1 • • ,. •, ,•;. ..,' '14 Page 455 of 465 RES.H EXHIBIT "A" Lot # t'— 7$157O•0240 ,.„ . Lots 3' and 4, B19ek 5, Towrt.�'of Sbghter, according to the plat thereof recorded in • • •Vole nine ,.2 of PI'ats page ya b, iq..: ing ,•qounty, Washington, subject to Covenants, ' Conditions Rq ,striclions •'atld Eascrnents''contt fined in the Lot Line Adjustment recorded January 1Z 200,6�,.`iindct Re6ordin j timber,, 00.1,17002764, Agreement and the Terms and Conditions thereof regarding the Cdrnrno Wall recorded October 1, 1947, under Recording ] urtbe0729624, ecords of KNrSeaiinty Washington. [12 1St Street SW, Auburn, WA 98402],,,"4 , ,` {i cti ': Lot ## 2 —7815700225 r' Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, TowEi of;5lavghtgr,,iccording to; the4:1at.{'thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page 56, iri K:ing,County, Washingtpni' together with that portion of the vacated alley adjacent thereto '&s. ier Citr''of Aubtirnf Ordinance„ Number 5842, I recorded „finder King County Recordinvg N4m1ie,C,,2904070800202,8, Sdtiject to: The, Basement and4he Terms and Conditions therm resery d by the City 'of•Aubur , affectingi a portion of said•premises within the vacated'' aUey ,..fbr,titilitics „rocorded;'Jul 8,,,1004, under' Recording ., Number 20040708002028; the rsgreeinept and, the �'errris Arid Conditions t1ierein:xegarding the right to erect pilasters,.i`eeord d October 1,'194.7, under Recording Nuinbet`.'3729624. [i'.bl S•,'`©ivision Sheet, Auburn, WA 98002] ' Lot 4A:7.18157'00'50 '• • 'That portion pt the Nprtheast:quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 13, Tot'vnship 21 Nbr,th, Range .4 !last, ,VM:, in King County Washington, being more particularly describcc as follows; ,Lots:5,;:6` and the: North half of Lots 7 and 8, Block 5, Town of Slaughter, according•xb the''pl'at thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, page 56, records of King Count;;.Washingtoti, ”. Except that portibn.of'said Ld't 5 eoiWeyyd Fl the: City of Auburn under Recording Number 20010508002955,: . ;• r •'; [That portion of Lot 5, .Mack 5, 7' wn.bf SOughter, according, to the plat thereof recorded in Mame 2 of Plats, page S &,recor of,king,caunt;f1l Waihlrigton,:dgserlbed as follows: Beginning ai the southwest corner of said Lot•.5, Thence: north along tie' We'St „margin of saldLot.5, a distance of 10 feet, Thence southeasterly to ihib•siouth;marg!n of sjld Lot '5,,..Thgnce west along the south margin of said Lot 5, a dlstanre of It? feet.lo the point of beginning itad containing 50 square feet] '` Together with the South half of the vacated alley. way Witting Lpts 5r 6, 7:'an5].8; •Qf said Block 5, as vacated under Ordinance No 5842 and,,,.re6orded urtdcr,Recording Nurtil?er 20040708002028; And Together With the North Half of th'e vdcated alley way-.abuttf0g Lots 3 and 4, of said Block 5, as vacated under Ordinance; Number 5842 and'recorded;i. under Recording Number 20040708002028, All Situate in the County Of King, State c Washington. .. u. Page 456 of 4E15 RES.H 04'•#•,5 — 7815700295 ,(LOt 4,,,,B1gck 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of Kingcountyt Washington. ' , •r2 l't Street SE, Auburn, WA 980021 .." LOt # 6 — ' 111.5'700290 ''.: P31 3,i B leek 6, T.oWn off, Slaughter, corded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of ,.'King Coiinty, Waskingtoi� a' '' Lot #'`' — '7.8157Otl2S5/ ' ,_" " a,'h '�, :. e Those Portions of Lpts 1 and i; sl6ck 6, 'I wn''ofSlaughter, according to the plat thereof recorded in IThlumo 2 of Plats, pag.ts` 56,,,jr %T fng,County, Washington, lying Westerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at`a pdint,bn the North line ofsaid Lot 1 lying 62.5 feet Easterly of the N'i rkhWest Comet of., aid.:Lot.2, Thence Soutkt'QX °00'22" West 29.5 feet; Thence South 89 °5.'53 "::West' 1 9, feet;'Thence South 00 °04'2A" West 75.69 feet; Thence South 89°56'19" Wast !3.5.2 feei to the' West°;lin F,Df"`said Lot 2; Thence Southerly along said West line 1'S feet to'th Southwest;, orner o! said Lot 2, being the terminus of said line, also known as 'L4 A of City of Aubuftn OA ieife" Aciustment No 0003 -95,E" recorded under King County Recor4ing Nb'95,02l 0960. ,;, .; . ? ' "i in Volume 2'of Plats,.•Page 561 recbrds' of ;: Lot #.9 — 781 5700300 Lot 5', I3198lc;6, Town of Slaughter, recorded King County,'; :WasJington. [1.V2 S.bivisiion Street] ;'Lot Lot (,10 181510035 ; 6,Bloek 6, Town.Q f Slaughter, recorded King County, ashiigto'n. Lot # 11 — 781:5701 31,4' Lot 7, Block 6;.,Town of,ilaughkei', "Tecorde4.in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, W'ashin'n. ' , Lot # 12— 7815700325 The North 29.80 feet of L.n 8 North 6.6 Feet of Lot 8' Block,• 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, `Pti'ge 56 'recd ds pf King County, Washington. [115 "A" Street SE, Auburn, WA 9800:1] ' "' Lot # 13 — 7815700326 in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56,, records of The South 30.2 feet of the North 60 feet of Lot'$, E#Iock 6, Town' of Slaughter; recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County:, Washington., ' [117 "A" Street SE, Aubum, WA 980011 Lot # 14 —7815700327 Lot 8, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page �6, reeb'rds of King County, Washington, Except the North 60 feet thereof. .s' Page 457 of 46 Downtown Redevelopment Area Parcels t Scho %Mr 4 w,-.A:k6104;57- oi- 4 Mlle! urrategjon s- Can Prof Plaza 1111, at Zr: — NZ. r LI iST* .11-114E? ah lismm-.‘-p WL 1) 7 • tt 2 11 Y.NP7s7-51477 67 SRI 14 Ln •,14 REr 5-atgway •,-Att.--znse45_ e • 1,11 amecoll or siowi .ec 11 Li 9 MVO/Med 1: 74137CO240 2: 711570=5 3: 741M230 3: 781570029S 7$1503:1290 7: miuocass St 7413700300 10: 7113701305 11: 7813700310 12 7115700325 13: 7013700326 7E15733327 1-4 • ri D.OwntisNelRedeveitipopEnt RES.H FEET Printed On: 12.112/11 map ID: 1849 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to it accuracy. Page 458 of 465 Exhibit "C" Coldwell Banker Danforth & Associates 33313 let Way Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: (253) 874-3200 Fax; (253) 838 -0760 EXCLUSIVE LEASE OR SALE LISTING AGREEMENT e Comanarc1a1 BrokuB Association 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CBA Form X4 Exaluslvo Loaso Rov, 112011 pap 1 04 (se TMs Agreement Is made by and between City of Auburn ( "Owner') and Coldwell Banker. Commercial Danforth ("Firm"). Owner hereby grants to Firm the exclusive and lrrevooablo right to tease ORSr=LL and to receipt for deposit in connection therewith Owner's oommerclal real estate legally described as set forth an attached Exhibit A and commonly described as set forth on attached exhibit A located In the, Clty of Auburn, lAng Courtly, Washington (the "Property "). 1. DURATION OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement shall commence on the effective date of City approval, 20 and shall explro at 11:60 p.m. on December 31, 2013. 2. PRICE AND TERMS, Owner agrees to list the Properly at a lease price of $TBD per ou ft annually an a "Triple Net' basis and shall consider offers that Include the following terms: Term of Lease: minimum five (6) nears Terms: Net Net Nel OWNER ALSO AGREES TO LIST fHE PI?OPEh 1 Y FOR SALE: AT' i PRICE $T8t , 3, DEFINITIONS. As used In this Agreement, (a) "CBA" shall mean the Commercial Brokers Association; (b) "lease" shall mean lease, sublease, sell, or enter into a contract to lease, sublease, or sell the Property; end (MALE" SHALL MEANA TRANSACTION WHEREBY FEE TITLE PROPERTY INTERESTS ARE CONVEYED TO ANOTHER PARTY AND (eD) 'lessee" shall Include sublee&eeesrlsLESSEES, if appiioebie. The phrases "this Agreement" and "during the term hereof include extensions or renewals of this Agreement. THE "ACCEPTABLE TENANT /LEs "SSEE /PURCHASER SHALL MEAN AN INDIVIDUAL, ENTITY OR ORGANIZATION WHOSE USE THE CITY HAS DETERMINED IS CONSISTENT WTH ITS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS. 4, AGENCY 1 DUAL AGENCY. Owner authorizes Firm to appoint Byron Hiller as Owner's Listing Broker. This Agreement creates an agency relationship with Listing Broker and any of Firm's brokers who supervise Listing Broker's performance as Owner's agent ( "Supervising Broker"), No other brokers affiliated with Firm are agents of Owner, except to the extent that Firm, In Its discretion, appoints other brokers to act on Owner's behalf as and when needed. If the Property Is leased OR sow to a tenant represented by one of Firm's brokers other than Listing Broker ("Tenant's f3rokor"), Owner consents to any Supervising Broker who also supervises Tenant's Broker acting as a dual agent. If the Property Is leased oR- toSOLD To a tenant who Listing Broker also represents, Owner consents to Listing Broker and Supervising Broker acting as dual agents. PRIOR TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT, Owner -OWNER SHALL Lhas received from Listing Broker the pamphlet entitled "The Law of Roal Estate Agency." If any of Firm's brokers act as a dual agent, Firm shall be entitled to the entire commission payable under this Agreement piva any additional compensation Firm may have negotiated with the tenant. U. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND INFORMATION. Owner warrants that Owner has the right to SELL. OR lease the Property on the terms set forth In this Agreement, and that the Property Is free and clear of any encumbrances which would interfere therewith, Owner also warrants that tho Information on the Property Information pages of this Agreement is correct. Owner understands that Firm and other members of CBA will make representations to prospective lessees based solely on the property information In this Agreement and agrees to Indemnify and hold Finn and other members of CBA harmless in the evens the foregoing warrantios aro lncorreot. Owner acknowledges receipt of a copy of this Agreement, with the Property Information pages of this Agreement fully completed, 6, COMMISSION, Firm shall be entitled to a commission If: (a) Flrm leases or procures a PURCHASER OR lessee on the terms of this Agreement, or on other terms acceptable to Owner; (b) Owner leases OR SELLS the Properly, WHETHER THROUGH ANY OTHER REAL ESTATE FIRM OR OTHERWISE, DURING THE TERM OF THIS AGREEMENT- 11reotly -or RES.H Page 459 of 4 5 RES.H Coldwell Banker Danforth & Associates 333131st Way 8 Federal Way, WA 08003 Phone: (263) 874 -3200 Fax; (263) 838 -0760 SD Comma/ail Brokoie Assodopan2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CM Form xL Exclusive Lease Rev. 1/2011 Page 2 of EXCLUSIVE LEASE OR SALE LISTING AGREEMENT (CONTINUED) Indireetly-er- through -any- person -eF entity - Est# per - than ePrrredurieg- thalerm- 4f-thie- Agreement; (c) Owner SELLS OR leases the Property within six months after the expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement to a person or entity that submitted an offer, LETTER OF INTENT, OR OTHER INDICATION OF wrERESrto purchase or lease the Property during the term of this Agreement or that appears on any registration list provided by Firm pursuant to this Agreement or an "Affiliate" of such a person or entity that submitted an offer or that appears on the registration Ilst; PROVIDED TI IAT ANY AND ALL COMPENSATION SHALL BE LIMITED 70 A MAXIMUM OF $25,000, (d)-the Property- Is- madeernleeeahle•by- Owner's- ueluetery -aotee ( e)• Owneroaneeleehis- Acgreementeor- otherwise prevents- Flrm.froneloaeing- the - Property, The commission shall be calculated as follows: six (6) oeroent of all gross recieots throughout the term of the first twenty (20) veers ref the lease. The Firms compensation will be In no event loss then slxJ§) petoepl,of ar transaolton, Includinga Ion term land Woo, contemplated In the Agency( Agreement, Firm shalt submit any registration list to Owner within 15 days after the expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement and shall only Include en the registration list persons or entities to whose attention the Property was brought through the signs, advertising or other action of Firm, or who received Information secured directly or Indirectly from or through Firm during the term of this Agreement, Owner shall provide the registration list to any other brokers that assist the Owner with this Property. "Affiliate" means, with respect to any person or entity that submitted an offer during the term of this Agreement or that appears on the registration fist, a person or entity which has more than a 10% ownership or voting Interest in such an entity or any entity in which more than 10% of the ownership or voting Interests are owned or controlled by such a person or entity, 7, FIRMJMULTIPLE LISTING. Firm shall cause this listing to be published by CBA for distribution to all CBA members through CBA's listing distribution systems. Firm shall cooperate with all other members of CBA in working toward the lease of the Property. Owner understands and agrees that all property Information contained in thls Agreement or otherwise given to CBA becomes the property of CBA, is not confidential, and will be given to third parties, Including prospective lessees, other cooperating members of CBA who do not represent the Owner and In some Instances, may represent the lessee and other parties granted access to CBA'a listing systems, Owner agrees that Firm may record this Agreement. Regardless of whether a cooperating member Is the -firm of the lessee, OR PURCHASER, the Owner, neither or both, the member shali be entitled to receive the selling office's share of the commission as designated by the listing office, IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT CBA IS NOT A PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT, AND ITS SOLE FUNCTION IS TO FURNISH THE DESCRIPTIVE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS LISTING TO i rs MEMBERS, WITHOUT VERIFICATION AND WITHOUT ASSUMING ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR SUCH INFORMATION OR IN RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT 6. ATTORNEY'S FEES, In the event either patty empioys an attorney to enforce any terms of this Agreement and Is successful, the other party agrees to pay a reasonable attorney's fee and any costs and expenses Incurred, In the event of trial, venue shall be in the county in which the Property Is located, and the amount of the attorney's fee shall be as fixed by the court. B. TERMINATION. THE AQFREEMENT MAY SE TERMINATED BY EITHER PARTY FOLLOWING NINETY (80) WRITTEN NOTIFICATION. 010. ADDITIONAL TERMS. In addition to the Property Information pages of this Agreement and Exhibit A (lega( description), the following amendments or addenda (whieig-ere-elso- attached- her -etc) are part of this Agreement. City oWnod properties represented In this Agreement are ay_aliablo for possible Offlco, retell, hetet, senior family or other residential development developed in accordance with as I1oabje and adopted design standards and guidelines. TMs listing agreement covers all possible commorgiol and residential developments, either try lease or by soil. EXCEPTIONS to thls Aereemenj are (a) transaolions With a company of W11lems and Dome development, Inc, or Ceradimm, LLG, In which oese commission wilt NOT be paid for any transaottort accomnllshed by Wilflame and Dante PeyeLegieetlt, ino,,Ceoradimm, LLC or any affiliated if either: (h) Olty use of lands owned by the City for Public) perking; (c) use of Clty land by euthprleed earbes for temporary events or purposes: and (gall leases, residential or commercial, on the parcel located et 2161 Steel SE, /auburn, WA Page 460 of 465 98002.. Caldwell Banker Danforth & Associates 333131at Way S Federal Way, WA 98003 Phone: (253) 87•3200 Fax: (203) 838.0780 Commardal Broken] Aso-dollar) 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED EXCLUSIVE LEASE OR SASE LISTING AGREEMENT (CONTINUED) CBA form XL Exdualva Loewo Rev. 14011 Pogo 3 of 4 ay( OW1 l Owner /AutitSrized Signature Name:') ' ' Name: Title Title Date TV 12_ Date Owner/Authorized Signature FIRM C•Idwel B aka Co i_r_or Danfort (Office) By uthorized ;pr ;,entetive Date: ",�,dj'1� RES.H , Firm (Company) Page 461 of 46 5 Lot #1 - 78/6700240 Lot #2 7816700226 Lot #3 - 7816700260 Lot 45 - 701 5700295 Lot #6 - 781 5700290 Lot 47 - 781 5700286 Lot #9 - 7816700300 Lot MO 7815700306 Lot #11 76/5700310 Lot #12 7815700325 Lot #13 7816700328 Lot #14 7816700327 Coldwetl 13anker Danforth & Aaeoolatea 33313 1st Way S Fedora) Way, WA 98003 Phone: (263) 874 -3200 Fax: (263) 838 -0760 W Cornrnerclal Brokaw Aasac1eIon20f1 ALL RIGHTS RE6ERVED EXCLUSIVE LIPASE OR SALE LISTING AGREEMENT (CONTINIkJED) EXHIBIT A (Legal Desorlptton) CO A Form XL Exalualva tense Rev. 112011 No 4 of h cale More detailed legal descriptions for the lots specified In Exhibit A are provided In Exhibit B. And "For purposes hereof, this Listing Agreement shall also Inolude parcels located within the four -block area bounded by Main Street the North, A Street SW to the West, 2nd Street SW /SE to the South and A Street 8E to the East, that are subsequently purchased by the city during the tern of this Listing Agroan ent or any axtenslon(s) thereof, along with any other "Outparcels" located within the area depicted on.Exhibit B ( "Downtown Redevelopment Area ") that are subsequently purchased by tho City during the term of this Listing Agreement or any extenslon(s) thereof, p:ovlded that this Listing Agreement shall not apply to any parcels Identified in this seotion that may be purchased by the City where the parcels are expressly purchased for municipal purposes" RES.H Page 462 of 465 EXHIBIT "R'► Lot #1 -. 7815700240 Lots 3 and 4, Block 5, Town of Slaughter, according to the plat thereof recorded 1n Volume 2 of Pints, page 56, In King County, Washington, subject to Covenants, Conditions, Restrictions and Easements contained in the Lot Line Adjustment recorded January 17, 2006, under Recording Number 20060117002764; Agreement and the Terris and Conditions thereof regarding the Common Wail recorded October 1, 1947, under Recording Number 3729624, records of King County Washington. [12 1' Street SW, Auburn, WA 98002] Lot # 2 - 7815700225 Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Town of Slaughter, according to the pint thereof recorded in Volume 2 ol'Plats, page 56, in King County, Washington; together With that portion of the vacated alley adjacent thereto as per City of' Auburn Ordinance Number 5842, recorded under King County Recording Number 20040708002028. Subject to: The Easement and the Terms and Conditions therein reserved by the City of Album affecting a portion of said premises within the vacated alley for utilities, recorded July 8, 2004, under Recording Number 20040708002028; the Agreement and the Terms and Conditions therein regarding the right to erect pilasters, recorded October 1, 1947, under Recording Number 3729624. [101 S. Division Street, Auburn, WA 98002] Lot # 3 - 7815700250 That portion of the Northeast quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 21 North, Range 4 last, WM, In King County Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Lots 5, 6 and the North half of Lots 7 and 8, Block 5, Town of Slaughter, according to the plat thereof recorded in, Volume 2 of Plats, page 56, records of King County, Washington, Except that portion of said Lot 5 conveyed to the City of Auburn under Recording Number 20010508002955, (That portion of Lot 5, Black 5, Town of Slaughter, according to the plot thereof recorded hi Volume 2 of Plats; yoga 5(r, ,wards of King County, If'nshtngton, described as follows.' Beginning at the southwest corner of saki Lot 5, Thence north along tha [vest Norght of suld,Lo1,5, a distance of WOfeat, Thence southeasterly to rho south margin of said Lot 5, Thence ,rust (long the south margin of sakl Lot 5, n distance of 10 feat to the point of begs nrlrrg and containing 50 square feat,/ Together with the South half of the vacated alloy way abutting lots 5, 6, 7 end 8, of saki Block 5, us vacated under Ordinance No 5842 and recorded under Recording NUInher 20040708002028; And Together- With the North llalf of the vacated allay way abutting Lots 3 and 4, of said ,Block 5, as vacated under Ordinance Number 5842 and recorded tinder Recording Number 20040708002028, All Situate En rho County of King, State of Washington. RES.H Page 463 of 465 Lot 05 — 7815700295 Lot 4, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington. [2 lsd Street SB, Auburn, WA 98002] Lot # 6 — 7815700290 Lot 3, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington. Lot # 7-78157120285 Those Portions of Lots 1 and 2, Bloch 6, Town of Slaughter, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, pate 56, In Xing County, Washington, lying Westerly ofa line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Lot 1 lying 62.5 feet Easterly of the Northwest Corner of sold Lot 2; Thence South 00 °00'22" West 29.5 feet; Thence South 89 °56'53" West l9 feet; Thence South 00 °00'22" West 75.69 feet; Thence South 89 °56'19" West 43.52 feet to the West line of said Lot 2; Thence Southerly along said West line 15 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 2, Wag the terminus of said line, also known as Lot A deity of Auburn Lot Line Adjustment No 0003 -95, recorded under King County Recording No 9502160960. Lot # 9 — 7815700300 Lot 5, 13Iook 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington. [122 S. Division Street) Lot # 10 — 7815700305 Lot 6, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington. Lot # 11- 7815700310 Lot 7, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded in Voluana 2 of Plats, Page 56, reoord9 of K1ng County, Washington. Lot # 12 — 781570 0325 The North 29.80 foot of Lot 8 North 60 Feet of Lot 8, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded In Volume 2 of Plats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington. [115 "A" Street SE, Auburn, WA 98001] Lot # 13 7815700326 The South 30.2 feet of the North 60 feet of Lot 8, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded In Volumo 2 of Plats, Page 56, records offing County, Washington. [117 "A" Street SE, Auburn, WA 98001] Lot # 14 —. 781570 0327 Lot 8, Block 6, Town of Slaughter, recorded In Volume 2 of flats, Page 56, records of King County, Washington, Except the North 60 feet thereof RES.H Page 464 of 4 5 1 i RES.H 0 �.!'_•• E57:5.}4 . . . .. = I , I I -F ..r I_ !1L&L a j 'j "I 1 -- " � � .' j r % @. I t /J/ S. x it T- P "r • • 44,44. LP" °� r {, ..i' Downtown Redevelopment Area Parcels Page 465 of 465