HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-02-2014 PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE AGENDAcrry or
WASH I NGTONJ
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
B. Announcements
C. Agenda Modifications
II. CONSENT AGENDA
Public Works Committee
September 2, 2014 - 3:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes*
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the August 18, 2014 Public
Works Committee meeting.
III. ACTION
A. Right-of-Way Use Permit No. 14 -33* (Mund)
Approve Right -of -Way Use Permit No. 14 -33 for Auburn Parks, Arts and
Recreation Veterans Day Parade
B. Public Works Project No. CP1308* (Truong)
Grant permission to advertise for bids for Project No. 1308, BNSF Utility
Crossings
C. Public Works Project No. CP1312* (Wickstrom)
Grant permission to initiate Project No. CP1312 Annual Storm Repair and
Replacement Project
D. Design Standards Revisions - Landscaping* (Welsh)
Approve the Auburn Design Standards Manual revisions to Chapter 10, Sections
10.08
E. Resolution No. 5095* (Vondrak)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, Authorizing
the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with the City of Kent regarding Auburn's S
277th Street Corridor Project and Jurisdiction over the South 277th Street
Corridor
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. 2014 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project (Carter)
B. Proposed Revision to City Engineering Design Standards (Para)
C. Capital Project Status Report* (Sweeting)
Page 1 of 66
D. Significant Infrastructure Projects by Others - Public Works Status
Report* (Gaub)
E. Action Tracking Matrix* (Gaub)
V. ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City
website (http: / /www.auburnwa.gov), and via e -mail. Complete agenda packets are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 2 of 66
C=ITY or
AUBURN
\VASH E NGTo
Agenda Subject:
Approval of Minutes
Department:
Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Draft Minutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Date:
August 27, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the August 18, 2014 Public Works
Committee meeting.
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff:
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: CA.A
CA.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 3 of 66
WASH € NGTONJ
Public Works Committee
August 18, 2014 - 3:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
I. CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Wayne Osborne called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in
Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall,
One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wayne Osborne, Vice -Chair Bill Peloza, and Member
Claude DaCorsi were present. Also present during the meeting
were: Mayor Nancy Backus, Community Development & Public
Works Director Kevin Snyder, Assistant Director of Engineering /City
Engineer Ingrid Gaub, Assistant City Engineer Jacob Sweeting,
Acting Utilities Engineer Susan Fenhaus, Transportation Manager
Pablo Para, Storm Drainage Engineer Tim Carlaw, Project Engineer
Luis Barba, Project Engineer Joel Chalmers, Street Systems
Engineer Jai Carter, Capital Projects Manager Ryan Vondrak,
Financial Planning Manager Bob Brooks and Public Works
Secretary Molly Mendez.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There was one agenda modification adding Discussion Item I, S
277th Street Corridor Project — Agreement with City of Kent, to the
agenda.
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the August 4,
2014 Public Works Committee meeting
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee approve the Public Works Committee Meeting
minutes for date, August 4, 2014.
Motion carried 3 -0.
III. ACTION
Page 1 of 5
CA.A Page 4 of 66
A. Public Works Project No. CP1322 (Barba)
Grant permission to advertise Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic
Signal Improvements
Project Engineer Barba explained staff is asking for permission to
advertize Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal Improvements.
Barba provided a brief overview of the project.
Project Engineer Barba clarified the number of specific locations on
the vicinity map following a question asked by Chairman Osborne.
In response to a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza, Project
Engineer Barba and Transportation Manager Para explained the
vehicle detection system.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee grant permission to advertise Project No.
CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal Improvements.
Motion carried 3 -0.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. 2014 Second Quarter Financial Report (Coleman)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item C.
Financial Planning Manager Brooks introduced himself to the
Committee.
The Committee members had a discussion regarding the Cemetery
net operating loss following a comment made by Vice -Chair Peloza.
Financial Planning Manager Brooks and Community Development &
Public Works Director Snyder responded to a question asked by
Member DaCorsi regarding the Real Estate Excise Tax chart on
page 29 of the packet.
In response to a question asked by Chairman Osborne, Financial
Planning Manager Brooks indicated the Criminal Costs on page 27
of the packet is revenue, not an expense.
Financial Planning Manager Brooks will follow up on a question
asked by Vice -Chair Peloza on page 17 of the packet regarding the
sentence which states "General Fund Expenditures are running
1.0% higher than the same period the prior year" and page 32 of the
packet regarding the operating loss. Vice -Chair Peloza has
requested an explanation on these items. Financial Planning
Page 2 of 5
CA.A Page 5 of 66
CA.A
Manager Brooks will follow up with the Committee providing
answers.
Vice -Chair Peloza also had questions regarding the Airport funds.
Financial Planning Manager will research this and report back.
B. Street Selection - 2015 Local Street Reconstruction Project (Carter)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed prior to
Discussion Item A.
Street System Engineer Carter provided the Committee with a brief
overview of this program.
Street System Engineer Carter clarified which streets are remaining
on this program in response to a question asked by Chairman
Osborne.
There was a brief discussion regarding 107th on Lea Hill following a
comment made by Vice -Chair Peloza.
Responding to a question asked by Member DaCorsi, Street System
Engineer Carter clarified the utility work on the selected streets.
C. Carwash Program (Carlaw)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item B.
Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw provided an overview of the
Carwash Program. Carlaw also brought a carwash kit to
demonstrate to the Committee.
There was a group discussion regarding the possibility of a
designated carwash location or locations in the City.
Storm Drainage Engineer Carlaw will investigate whether the City
has brochures for this program following a comment made by Vice -
Chair Peloza.
D. System Development Charges (Fenhaus)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item A.
There was a group discussion regarding different recommendations
pertaining to the proposed System Development Charge increase.
Staff will prepare and provide a longer term phase in approach to
the Committee based on the discussion.
Page 3 of 5
Page 6 of 66
CA.A
E. Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor Improvements (Para)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item I.
Transportation Manager Para distributed a map which illustrates the
Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor. Para also provided
an overview of this item.
Transportation Manager Para informed the Committee what
jurisdictions are helping fund this project following a question asked
by Chairman Osborne.
Committee expressed their support for the proposed City of Auburn
commitment to Pacific's project.
F. Capital Project Status Report (Sweeting)
Item 7 — CP1024 — AWS and M Street SE Intersection
Improvements:
Assistant City Engineer Sweeting explained that most of the work
from Puget Sound Energy is complete in response to a question
asked by Chairman Osborne.
Item 8 — CP1104 — 104th Street & 8th Street NE Intersection
Improvements:
Following a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza, Assistant City
Engineer Sweeting provided brief overview of the work that will be
completed with this project.
Item 10 — CP1208 — Sewer Pump Station Improvements (Repair &
Replacement Program):
In response to a question asked by Chairman Osborne, Assistant
City Engineer Sweeting indicated the design phase has not had any
issues.
Item13 — CP0915 — Well 1 Improvements — Well Replacement:
Chairman Osborne asked if it has been decided whether this project
will rehabilitate or replace Well 1. Acting Utilities Engineering
Fenhaus responded stating the plan is to rehabilitate.
G. Significant Infrastructure Projects by Others - Public Works Status
Report (Gaub)
Item 2 — Reddington Levee:
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub provided an
explanation of the remaining project work in response to a question
asked by Vice -Chair Peloza.
Page 4 of 5
Page 7 of 66
Item 5 — 124th Avenue SE Half Street Road Improvements:
Responding to a question asked by Chairman Osborne, Assistant
Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub indicated that the
majority of the improvements are complete.
Item 7 — Auburn Way South and M Street SE /Howard Road:
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub provided an
overview of this item following a question asked by Chairman
Osborne.
H. Action Tracking Matrix (Gaub)
Chairman Osborne asked that System Development Charges be
updated on the matrix.
I. S 277th Street Corridor Project - Agreement with City of Kent
(Vondrak)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item D.
Capital Projects Manager Vondrak explained this is a draft
agreement between the City of Kent and the City of Auburn as it
relates to the cities South 277th Street Corridor Capacity and Non
Motorized Trail Improvement Project.
Using an aerial map, Capital Projects Manager Vondrak indicated
the portion that would change from the City of Kent's jurisdiction to
the City of Auburn's jurisdiction with this agreement.
V. ADJOURNMENT
CA.A
There being no further business to come before the Public Works
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:03 p.m.
Approved this 2nd day of September, 2014.
Wayne Osborne Molly Mendez
Chairman Public Works Department Secretary
Page 5 of 5
Page 8 of 66
AuBuRN ITY Cdr •
\VASH E NGTo
Agenda Subject:
Right -of -Way Use Permit No. 14 -33
Department:
Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Permit Conditions
Street Closure List
Vidnity Map
Administrative Recommendation:
Date:
August 26, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Public Works Committee approve Right -of -Way Use Permit No. 14 -33 for Auburn
Parks, Arts and Recreation Veterans Day Parade.
Background Summary:
Right -of -Way Use permit 14 -33 would allow the City of Auburn Parks, Arts and
Recreation Department to use City streets on Saturday, November 8, 2014, from 6:00
am to 11:00 pm, for their annual Veterans Day Parade, Static Display and Band
Championship. Please see the attached list of street closures and map for specific
street closures and times. The Parks Department will make all necessary street
closure arrangements with Community Development and Public Works Dept., Police
Dept. and Valley Regional Fire Authority.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Mund
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: ACT.A
ACT.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 9 of 66
ROW Use Permit 14 -33, Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation
Veterans Day Parade
The conditions of this ROW Use Permit are:
1. Applicant shall maintain a 5 -foot clear path for pedestrians on the
sidewalk.
2. Applicant shall adhere to the approved traffic control plan and street
closure list.
3. Auburn Police will close the intersection of Auburn Way S/N and East
Main Street to all traffic , with the exception of emergency vehicles.
4. Auburn Police Explorers will direct traffic at the intersections of Auburn
Way North and 4th Street NE, Auburn Way North and 1st Street NE,
Auburn Ave and 1st Street NE, West Main Street and B St NW, and
Auburn Way South and 2nd Street SE.
5. Applicant shall provide parade marshals stationed at D Street NE and E
Main Street to clear pedestrians in the event of a police response
emergency.
6. Applicant shall obtain a Parade Permit from the Community Development
and Public Works Department.
7. The City reserves the right to adjust the terms and conditions or revoke
this Right -of -Way Use Permit pending the following considerations:
a. Public complaints involving perceived issues impacting public use of
the ROW affected by the permit.
b. Public comment or other community interest concerns.
c. Any emerging issue or change in use of the ROW that may impact the
public interest, as follows:
• The remaining capacity of the rights -of -way to accommodate other
uses if the applicant's proposed use is granted.
• The effect, if any, on public health, safety, and welfare if the
authorization is granted.
• Such other factors as may demonstrate that the grant to use the
rights -of -way will serve the community interest.
ACT.A Page 10 of 66
AUBURN'S VETERANS DAY PARADE STREET CLOSURES - November 8, 2014
6:00a.m. — 3:OOp.m.
1. Main Street between M Street SE and C Street SW (closed and cleared)
2. N/S Division Street from 1st Street NE to 2nd Street SE (closed and cleared)
3. B Street NE between Main Street and 1st Street NE
4. B Street SW between Main Street and 1St Street NW
5. A Street SW /NW Between 1st SW and 2nd NW — put no parking signs out prior to event on
North Side of Main
6. 1St Street NW between B St. NW to N Division Street
7. E Street NE from Veterans Memorial Park to Main Street — Put no parking signs out prior to
event
8. 1st Street NE from D Street NE to E Street NE, just after parking lot
9. Make a temporary 4 way stop at corner of E ST NE and 4th ST NE
10. F Street SE between Main Street and 4th Street SE
11. E Street SE between Main Street and 4th Street SE
12. G Street SE between Main Street and 4th Street SE
13. H Street SE between Main Street and 4th Street SE
14. I Street SE between Main Street and 4th Street SE
15. J Street NE /SE between 4th Street NE and 4th Street SE
a. J St NE between 1st St NE and 4th St NE to be closed from 6 am to 11 PM
16. K Street SE between Main St and 4th Street SE
17. K St NE between 4th St NE and 5th St NE to be closed from 6 am to 11 PM (to include Fulmer
Park West Parking Lot)
18. K St NE between Main St and 4th St NE will be closed for construction by others
19. L Street NE /SE between 3rd Street NE and 4th Street SE
20. Keep 2nd Street SE clear for cross traffic during parade formation
21. Eastbound lane of Park Ave from Auburn Way to Veterans Memorial Park (Westbound lane can
remain open) (closed and cleared); Park Avenue and E Street inside of park closed and cleared
(both sides)
ACT.A Page 11 of 66
8:00a.m. — 11:00p.m.
22. 4th Street NE between E Street NE and M Street NE
23. H St. NE from 4th to 5th ST NE
10:30a.m. — after parade
24. Close Auburn Way S and A Street SE from 2nd St SE to Main St to all through traffic
including Metro.
ACT.A Page 12 of 66
DETOUR ROUTE
EXPLORERS
DETOUR ROUTE SIGNS
CLOSED STREET SIGNS
STREET SIGNS
SCALE:1 " =500'
Ragc13of66
AuBuRN rrY, r
WASH NGTo
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1308
Department:
Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Vidnity Map
Administrative Recommendation:
Date:
August 26, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Public Works Committee recommend City Council grant permission to advertise for
bids for Project No. 1308, BNSF Utility Crossings.
Background Summary:
This project will design and construct utility improvements required by Burlington
Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) to accommodate the new BNSF 3rd rail line that
will extend from Ellingson Road to South 277th Street along the west side of the
existing north -south tracks. BNSF requires that all utilities are constructed in casings
to protect them from train loadings and to allow maintenance and replacement without
impacting rail traffic. Several City utilities that cross the rail alignment were
constructed prior to the implementation of BNSF's casing requirement and are not
encased adequately to address the proposed 3rd rail. This project will replace these
utilities in casings that meet BNSF requirements and construct the associated
roadway and other surface restoration.
Construction is anticipated to begin in September 2014 and be complete in March
2015.
The estimated total project cost for water improvements is $780,001.00, which is
equal to the amount budgeted within the Water Fund for the project.
The estimated total project cost for sewer improvements is $441,000.00, which is
equal to the amount budgeted within the Sewer Fund for the project.
The estimated total project cost for storm improvements is $546,101.00, which is
equal to the amount budgeted within the Storm Fund for the project.
ACT.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 14 of 66
A project increase of $220,000.00 within the Arterial Streets Fund will be necessary,
however it will not require a budget adjustment since it is anticipated that the budgeted
expenditures in the Transportation Funds will not be exceeded this year.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Truong
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: ACT.B
ACT.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 15 of 66
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: CP1308
Project Title: BNSF Utility Crossings
Project Manager: Kim Truong
Initiation Date: 5/13/13
Advertisement Date:
Award Date:
Date: 8/26/14
• Permision to Advertise
O Contract Award
O Change Order Approval
O Contract Final Acceptance
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
430 Fund - Water (Bond Proceeds)
0
51,357
728,644
780,001
431 Fund - Sewer
0
14,440
426,560
441,000
432 Fund - Storm Drainage (Bond Proceeds)
0
42,328
503,773
546,101
102 Fund - Arterial Streets
0
0
150,000
150,000
Total
0
108,125
1,808,977
1,917,102
Activity
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
City Design
0
26,683
39,516
66,199
Consultant Design
0
85,341
170,896
256,237
Construction Contract
0
0
1,436,913
1,436,913
Authorized Contingency
0
0
292,182
292,182
BNSF Permits
0
0
44,469
44,469
Construction Engineering
0
0
45,000
45,000
Total
0
112,024
2,028,976
2,141,000
430 Water Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual) 2014
Total
*430 Funds Budgeted ()
0
(51,357)
(728,644)
(780,001)
430 Funds Needed
0
51,357
728,644
780,001
*430 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
(0)
(0)
430 Funds Required
0
0
0
0
431 Sewer Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual) 2014
Total
*431 Funds Budgeted ()
0
(14,440)
(426,560)
(441,000)
431 Funds Needed
0
14,440
426,560
441,000
*431 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
(0)
(0)
431 Funds Required
0
0
0
0
432 Storm Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual) 2014
Total
*432 Funds Budgeted ()
0
(42,328)
(503,773)
(546,101)
432 Funds Needed
0
42,328
503,773
546,101
*432 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
(0)
(0)
432 Funds Required
0
0
0
0
102 Arterial Streets Budget Status
Budget Status 2013 (actual) 2014 0
*102 Funds Budgeted ()
0
0
(150,000)
(150,000)
102 Funds Needed
0
0
370,000
370,000
*102 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
102 Funds Required
0
0
220,000
220,000
Adi_ighe Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
Page 16 of 66
B PL NW
U
C
z
3 th
ST
_W_
■ ST ■
■ SS ■
LEGEND
WATER MAIN CROSSING
STORM DRAINAGE CROSSING
SANITARY SEWER CROSSING
PROJECT SITE #3
(37th Street NW)
2eth sr am
AUBURN
COLE
COURSE
Slr fir
26th ST
NW
F
22nd ST
ST NW
15th
PROJECT SITE #4
(Black Diamond Rd)
CITY OF
AU u'
ACT. B
B
WASHINGTON
BNSF UTILITY CROSSINGS PROJECT
VICINITY MAP
August 2014
NOT TO SCALE
Page 17 of 66
AuBuRN ITY OF �
wAs - IENG10
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1312
Department:
Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Vidnity Map
Administrative Recommendation:
Date:
August 26, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Public Works Committee grant permission to initiate Project No. CP1312 Annual
Storm Repair and Replacement Project.
Background Summary:
The project will construct the following storm drainage repairs /replacements:
20th Ct SE and 0 Ct SE: Abandon the existing storm pond and replace 100 feet of
storm drainage pipe. The liner in this storm pond has deteriorated and the pond is no
longer functioning like it should. Rather than replace the lining, staff has determined
that it is more cost effective to abandon the pond and reroute the storm drainage to
the existing storm drainage system on 21st St SE.
Academy Dr SE and Maple Dr SE: Replace 440 feet of deteriorated and damaged
pipe located north of Maple Dr SE.
SE 312th St and 124th Ave SE: Install 180 feet of new storm drainage pipe. Staff has
determined that a catch basin on 124th Ave SE is not properly connected to the storm
drainage system which has been causing local flooding issues. The new storm
drainage pipe installed by this project will fix this problem.
Construction of this project is anticipated to start spring in of 2015.
This project is within the budgeted funds available in the 432 Storm Fund.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Wickstrom
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: ACT.0
ACT.0
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 18 of 66
ACT.0
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 19 of 66
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: CP1312 Project Title: Annual Storm Pipeline Repair and Replacement Project
Project Manager: Seth Wickstrom
Initiation Date:
Advertisement Date:
Award Date:
• Project Initiation
O Permission to Advertise
O Contract Award
• Change Order Approval
O Contract Final Acceptance
Date: August 26, 2014
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding
Prior Years
2014
2015
Future Years
Total
432 Fund - Storm R &R Program*
8,495
324,505
1,000
0
333,000
Total
8,495
324,505
0
0
333,000
* This is a portion of the 2013 annual budget for the Storm Repair & Replacement Program.
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Activity
Prior Years
2014
2015
Future Years
Total
Design Engineering - City Costs
8,495
38,505
1,000
0
48,000
Construction Estimate
8,495
38,505
207,500
0
207,500
Project Contingency (20 %)
0
(286,000)
41,500
0
41,500
Construction Engineering - City Costs
0
0
36,000
0
36,000
Total
8,495
38,505
286,000
0
333,000
432 Storm Budget Status
** ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
H:\PROJ\CP1312 Storm Drainage Pipeline Repair & Replacement \3.00 Project Management \3.20 Bud et \Bud et
T
u ( Sheet.xIs Page ?Qpf 66
Prior Years
2014
2015
Future Years
Total
* *432 Funds Budgeted ()
(8,495)
(324,505)
0
0
(333,000)
432 Funds Needed
8,495
38,505
286,000
0
333,000
* *432 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
(286,000)
0
0
0
432 Funds Required
0
0
286,000
0
0
** ( #) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
H:\PROJ\CP1312 Storm Drainage Pipeline Repair & Replacement \3.00 Project Management \3.20 Bud et \Bud et
T
u ( Sheet.xIs Page ?Qpf 66
1
SE NOM
ST
Mem
SE 310th ST
z-1_4
6
*AK&
SE 312th St
124th Ave SE to
125th Ave SE
Work:
Install New Pipe
i
•
Wra
49
NA
GREEN RIVER
COMMUNITY
COLLEGE
N
20th Ct SE
NC[SEta0CTSE
Work:
Abandon Storm
Pond
MUCKLESHOOT
CASINO s
VALLEY
RO,
CED
L4
r
VICINITY MAP
CP1312 - Annual Storm
Repair and Replacement
Project
0 1 000ft 2 000ft
SCALE: 1 inch = 2,000 feet
J
rtm
ACADEMY DR
Maple Dr SE to
Road Closure
Work:
Replace Pipe
93rd Sr
0E i
Page 21 of 66
Plotted: 9/24/2012 Location HAPR071cproject folder ,lProjectMgmtlITIP1Vionity Mapdwg
C=ITY or
AUBURN
WASH E NCTO
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Design Standards Revisions - Landscaping August 26, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Document showing revisions $0
Draft Final
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee approve the Auburn Design Standards Manual revisions to
Chapter 10, Sections 10.08.
Background Summary:
As a result of several years of experience of working with the landscaping portion of
the Auburn Design Standards, City staff is proposing to update these standards.
Highlights of the changes include the expansion of the list of trees (Table 10 -5A) and
shrubs (Table 10 -5B) which are allowed to be planted in the public right of way. These
proposed changes to the standards have been reviewed by the City's arborist, Streets
and Vegetation divisions of Maintenance and Operations Services and by Engineering
Services of Community Development and Public Works.
The goal of the proposed changes is to respond to the requests of the public for
greater diversity in our list of approved tree species while making other changes to
protect the public and our infrastructure from the impacts of landscaping in the right of
way. These proposed changes are intended to improve the requirements to protect
sidewalks from tree roots, and reduce the likelihood of overplanted trees impacting in-
ground utilities, impairing visibility of street signage and reducing the effectiveness of
street lighting.
Based on recent discussion with the Public Works Committee the proposed changes
have been amended. Sections that have been changed from the previous version
include 10.08.5.1 Overhead Wires, Street Lighting; 10.08.5.3 Root Directional Devices
and 10.08.10 Grass or Ground Cover. Additionally, Table 10 -5A has been amended to
indicate which trees are recommended for planting near power lines.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
ACT.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 22 of 66
Councilmember: Osborne
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014
ACT.D
Staff: Welsh
Item Number: ACT.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 23 of 66
10.08 Landscaping
10.08.1 General Landscaping Requirements
An area devoted to landscaping is included within the right -of -way of all street
classifications. This landscape strip is an integral part of the roadway cross - section. It
serves several important functions, including improving pedestrian safety by providing a
buffer between traffic and the sidewalk; providing the perception of a narrower travel
corridor, thereby slowing traffic; improving air quality; and improving the aesthetic
appearance of the street. Located between the sidewalk and the street, landscape strips
are frequently used by pedestrians, hence they should not contain shrubs for these can
create a tripping hazard. Shrubs with a mature height not greater than 3 feet are however
often appropriate in medians, entry features and other landscaped areas in the public right
of way not traversed by pedestrians.
The developer shall design and install the landscape strip in accordance with these design
standards. The proposed design shall be reviewed and approved by the City.
Landscape strips are required for local residential streets and residential collector streets.
The minimum width required for landscape strips is five feet (5'). Landscape strips shall be
located between the back of the curb and the sidewalk. The Developer shall provide for
and plant street trees within the landscape strip in accordance with these design
standards.
Street trees are required for principal arterials, minor arterials, non - residential collectors,
and local non - residential streets. Street trees shall be placed within the sidewalk in tree
pits with tree grates and spaced in accordance with the standards identified in section
10.08.5.1.
10.08.2 Landscape Strip Components
Landscape strips contain several components. These include soil, the plants themselves,
structural items such as root barriers and tree grates, and may include street furnishings
such as luminaries, traffic signs, bus stops or shelters, benches, and mail boxes.
10.08.3 Landscape Strip Dimensions
The roadway sections designate either five -foot (5') or five - and -a- half -foot (5W) wide
landscape strips.
10.08.4 Plant Layers
In order to balance a safe walking environment and improved aesthetics and air quality, It a
multilayer planting approach is +s recommended that a multi layer planting be used in the
landscape strip. For instance, grass or an approved ground cover should be used at the
ground IeveL, - e e • _ • _ e _ . _ _ _ _ • _ • _ _ . _ _ • - Properly spaced trees
form the upper or canopy level. Within this general framework are many choices, outlined
in the Plant Selection section below.
In summary, the landscape strip will contain the following layers:
1. Ground Cover(s) or Grass — Required
Trees — Required
ACT.D Page 24 of 66
10.08.5 Trees
10.08.5.1 Placement and Spacing
Trees shall be placed so that they do not obstruct the view of any street intersection,
driveway, or visibility of any traffic control device or sign. Sight distance triangles shall
be used to analyze visibility at street intersections. Trees shall be centered in the
landscape strip. When a landscape strip is not required, trees shall be placed in tree
tree wellspits with tree grates within the sidewalk per City of Auburn Standard Detail
TRAFFIC -64.
Trees will be spaced as follows, except where special site conditions require variation
for safety or other reasons:
Tree Size
t
Landscape.
Strip rc
Small
To 25 Feet
15 20 Feet Apart
5 Feet
Mem
25 50 Feet
2-0-3-0-Fe-e4-Apart
5.5 8 Feet
e
50 70 Feet
8 12 Feet
Very Largo
70 Feet
50 Feet or Greater
12 Feet
Nearby features such as street lighting, inground utilities, buildings or overhead wires
will also affect where trees should be located. Minimum size for street trees shall be a
two -inch (2 ") caliper, measured two feet (2') above the root ball.
Minimum spacing for street trees should be 1 1/2 times the mature diameter of the tree
canopy as identified in table 10 -5A.
Planting Next to a Building: Where a building is placed close to the sidewalk, the
mature size of a tree should be considered when selecting species. Trees with a
pyramidal, columnar, or oval shaped canopy are preferable; a tree with a round head is
generally unsuitable in this situation.
Overhead Wires: When trees must be planted directly under or when the mature
canopy is within 12 feet of overhead utility lines, species with a mature
maximumaximum height of twenty -five feet (25') should must be selected.
Street Lighting: Trees should generally need to be located at least half their mature
canopy width or twenty feet (20') from light standards, whichever is greater. Planting
locations should be coordinated with locations of lighting standards.
Street Signage: Trees shall be planted to avoid blocking the view of street
signage
Underground Utilities: Trees shall
underground utilities
Clearance: Trees shall be pruned as
vertical clearance above sidewalks and
roadway surfaces.
be planted so as to avoid impacts on
10.08.5.2 Tree Canopy Shape
they grow to provide at least seven feet (7')
fourteen feet (14') of vertical clearance above
ACT.D Page 25 of 66
Tree canopy shapes are an important factor in the selection of street trees. The setting
will often dictate which canopy shapes are most appropriate. This in turn will aid in the
selection of the most suitable species.
The guidance offered below includes information about which tree canopy shapes work
best under different conditions. Table 10-4 5A offers information about tree species
and their canopy shapes.
10.08.5.2.1 V- Shaped Trees
V- shaped (sometimes also called "vase shaped ") trees have canopies that are
narrow toward the bottom and broad at the top. The American Elm is a classic
street tree with this shape. V- shaped trees may have arching branches that form a
canopy over both street and sidewalk. They generally do not cause problems with
overhead power lines or traffic.
10.08.5.2.2 Pyramidal Trees
Pyramidal or cone - shaped trees are typically broad at the base of the canopy and
are somewhat pointed at the top. European Beech is one tree that becomes,
pyramidal with age. Planted close together, pyramidal trees can screen unwanted
views or create vistas. Lower branches sometimes droop with age and may have to
be limbed up in later years to provide the needed clearance.
10.08.5.2.3 Round Trees
These are generally wide spreading trees that need more space than other shapes.
The Red Sunset Maple is one example of a round tree.
10.08.5.2.4 Oval Trees
An oval tree is a good choice around buildings and adjacent to traffic. Oval trees,
like the Raywood Ash, Oval trees are taller than they are wide and cause lessittle
interference with traffic.
10.08.5.2.5 Columnar Trees
Columnar trees are useful in locations where there is little available room between
the street and buildings, awnings, or other features. Branches of columnar trees
tend to grow up rather than out. Many branch lower than other types of trees
without causing problems with traffic or pedestrians.
10.08.5.3 Root Direction Devices
All street trees planted within a five -foot (5') wide landscape strip shall use a root
direction device to deflect tree roots downward into the soil. Any tree planted on public
property within 3 10 feet or less of a sidewalk or curb shall be planted with a root
directional device. These devices are used to eliminate damage to sidewalks as the
tree roots extend beyond the original planting pit.
The root barrier should be placed along two sides of the tree, parallel to the sidewalk
and to the curb line. Under specific circumstances, wider strips that contain utilities
may also need root barriers to reduce conflicts. Plan submissions should indicate the
location of root barriers and provide a specification sheet on the product to be used.
10.08.5.4 Tree Planting Wells and Grates
In highly urbanized settings such as downtown, it may be necessary to install street
trees into an existing street and sidewalk setting. Where high levels of pedestrian traffic
is expected, it may be necessary to place trees into a paved area rather than a
landscape strip. In these situations planting wells and grates may be necessary. The
ACT.D Page 26 of 66
desirable size for a tree planting well is thirty -six square feet (36 sq.ft.) or greater. A
minimum of twenty -five square feet (25 sq.ft.) should be provided.
Where trees are within a heavily traveled pedestrian area, their roots can be easily
damaged. In these areas tree grates or other means such as pavers in sand will be
required to protect the health of the tree.
Where tree wells or grates are necessary, provide planting details, specifications, and
product sheets for proposed tree - planting wells and tree grates. See Standard Details
TRAFFIC -14 and TRAFFIC -15.
10.08.6 Plant Selection
There are innumerable plant choices for each layer of the landscape strip. Selection is
based on:
• Size of the landscape strip
• Canopy shape of trees
• Size and type of leaves
• Root shape
• Site environmental conditions, such as the amount of sunlight available or
moisture in the soil; and
• Aesthetic qualities desired.
Needled evergreens, such as firs or spruces, shall NOT be
unless the strips are very wide.
as-Geiatab-l-e.
10.08.7 Plant Selection Tables
Table 10 -5A provides several acceptable species of trees.ground covers, shrubs less than
. Many other trees plants are
appropriate= and alternative selections may be proposed if desired. Alternative plant
choices must w111 be evaluated and approved by the City.
Column Headings: A short description of several of the column headings follows:
Size:
Small To 25 Feet
Medium 25 to 50 Feet
Large 50 to 70 Feet
Height and Canopy Width (in feet):
Trees vary considerably in height and mature width and these dimensions are
identified per species to ensure that the right tree is being planted in the right location.
used in landscape strips,
Landscape Strips/Wells and Grates and Medians
This section identifies which species are appropriate to be planted in these locations
Sun:
Sun Needs full sun
Sun /Shade Takes sun to part shade; needs at least 1/2 day of sun
Shade Shade to part shade. Protect from full sun, especially in afternoon
H2O Req. (Requirement):
ACT.D Page 27 of 66
Low Drought tolerant after 1st year
Mod Moderate water need. May need supplemental watering during dry season.
High Requires irrigation
Canopy Shape:
"V" V- shaped Trees (sometimes also called "vase shaped trees ")
Pyramid Pyramidal trees or cone shaped trees
Round Round trees
Oval Oval trees
Col. Columnar trees
See Table 10 -5A with Tree Matrix
TABLE 10 -5A (TREES FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ENVIRONMENT)
Setaaisal
Name
Common
e
a
urn
Re+
i andccape
S}rAiP
Width.
Canopy
S-hape
Re nrLLc
Acer campcctrc
Maple
Small/
Med
S-NF/
Shads
Med
5 8 Feet
RaNRE,
Tough urban plant. Any well drained
=oil. Yellow fall color. Broad crown. May
Acer
Amur Maplc
Small
Sun/
5 8 Feet
Spectacular scarlet fall color. Fast
growing. Tolcrant of many soils,
pollution, salt and drought.
ginnala
Shadc
Acer platanoidcs
'Armstrong'
Norway
-La-r-ge
Med
Med
e
Sun
8 12 Feet
Oval
Col.
Vcry adaptable to soil and climate,
condition. Difficult to grow gra -s under.
Many cultivars w/varying heights&
shapes.
5 8 Feet
5 8 Feet
8 12 Feet
' Col umnare'
Maple
Round-.
'Schwedleri'
Oval
Acer rubrum
Red maple
T`°°" �"°
Med/
Largo
Sun
Med
5 8 Feet
Oval
Very adaptable: will grow in swamps or
on rocky slopes. Nccds shade over root
'Red Sunset'
'Oct. Glory'
or a whcn used as a street trcc.
Othcrs availablc
Carpinus bctulus
'Columaris'
European
Hornbeam
Small/
&NF/
Shadc
5 8 Feet
SCI.
Elegant app arancc: nccds no pruning.
Pest &dis ace free.
Gercidyphyllum
japonicum
p
_i_tairwa
Tree,
Med.
Sun
Med
5 8 Feet
Round
autiful trcc w /delicate tcxturc, red
tinged I avcs, good fall color. Shape,
varies; can be multi stemmed.
Transplant B&B, early spring. Rich,
moist, well drained soil.
Cercic
sanaelenSls
Eactern
Small
Sun/
5 8 Feet
4Rou
Spr habitw /flat top. Transplant&
D° h „�
Shadc
ceding
Fraxinuo
Golden
newer+ o�h
Med
Mad
5 8 Feet
Oval
ex-yea-9ge
new newer+
Small, narrow leaves give a tidy, fcrn
like app arancc. Cold twigs, attractive
in winter. Red to purple fall color.
R°"T^°”
�a
Ginkgo
o
Largo
Sun
Med
5 8 Feet
COI. to
Distinctive fan shaped I af. Light green
foliage in spring; bright yellow in fall.
Plant male tress only. Slow growing.
Tolerates wide variety of soil conditions.
g
Liquidambar
styraciflua
Sweetgum
-La rge
stn
Med
5 8 Feet
Col. to
Oval
Dense canopy of 5 lobed, star shaped
leaves. Yellow to red fall color. Pointed,
woody fruit can be a nuisance.
Pyrus callcryana
Gallery
Pear
,.,
5 8 Feet
Pyramid
Dark grccn glossy I avcc in cummcr,
scarlet in fall. H avy clusters of white
flowers in spring. May nccd corrective
pruning whcn young. Varictics
'Aristocrat', 'Chanticleer', 'Rcdspirc'
and varicticc
{-F-Iewari-ng
'e'7
to Oval
have a variety of canopy shapes.
Quercus rubra
Red-Oak
&Nn
High
8 12 Feet
Round
Easy to transplant. Necds fcrtilc, well
drained soil, plenty of water. Tolerate&
pollution. High branching and fairly
Very
Largo
big lawns and blvds. Dark rcd, or
orange fall color. Fast growing.
Tilia cordata
'Greenspire'
Littleleaf
Mod
Med
5 8 Feet
Oval/
Pyramid
Formal look. Upright branching. Needs
well drained, fertile soil. Tolcrant of
Fragrant yellowish flowers in clusters in
Junc.
men
Shadc
Zelkova ccrrata
waie, e r_ree
Zelkova
Med
stn
4aAed
8 12 Feet
Craccful vase shaped trcc resembling
the elm. Fair tolerance of soils, best in
- - -- - -- - - - - -- .
spring yellow to ruaset in fail.
ACT.D
Page 28 of 66
Table 10 -5B provides several acceptable species of around covers and, shrubs less than 3
feet high. Many other types of plants may be appropriate and alternative selections may
be proposed if desired. Alternative plant choices must be evaluated and approved by the
City.
See Table 10 -5B
10.08.8 Planting Methods and Maintenance
Good horticultural practice should be employed in the preparation of the soil and planting
pits. This will include:
1. Conserving topsoil and replacing it on the site.
2. Performing soil tests.
3. Providing corrective soil preparation as necessary.
10.08.9 Establishment Period
The developer will be responsible for maintaining the trees and plants in the public
landscape strip, medians and entry features -in a healthy condition for one (1) year after
acceptance of the project. Because landscape strips do not usually include irrigation,
maintenance will include providing water during dry periods. Weeds, diseases, and insect
pests must also be controlled.
10.08.10 Deviations from the Landscape Strip Standards
Site conditions may occasionally make adhering to the landscape strip standards difficult.
Deviations from the standards may be requested. The following paragraphs list
circumstances that may be appropriate conditions for requesting a departure from the
design standards:
Root Direction Device: The root direction device may be omitted if the planting strip if
very wide or if the variety of tree to be planted is known to cause no sidewalk upheaval.
Grass or Ground Cover: Where it is extremely difficult to maintain grass or ground cover
in a landscape strip, heavy stone aggregate such as a washed river rock may be an
acceptable substitute. Lightweight rock such as lava rock is not acceptable. Paving over
the landscape strip will rarely is not be acceptable.
ACT.D Page 29 of 66
TABLE 10 5 (GROUND COVER /LOW SHRUBS)
Botanical
Common
-Name
Size
Spicin g
�
Mirk
"1 €1 apa
Strip
Wdthth
s
Re nr c aName
Arctoctaphylos
una urci
Kinnikinnick
Small
S
5 8 Feet
♦
Uccful on clops, poor or dry
coils. Slow to establish; mutt
address arly weed problems.
Searberry
Shadc
C. dammeri
Bearberry
3" 6"
Sun/
5 8 Feet
♦
Fact growing, roots freely.
Cotoneaster
Shade
1=1edera -mill*
English Ivy
6" 12"
12" 18"
5 8 Feet
Vigorous, should bc within a
contained area. Will climb
vertical surfaces.
e
H. h. 'Baltica'
Baltic Ivy
&" 12"
12" 18"
Sun/
5 8 Feet
Smaller leaf than English Ivy; not
as aggreacivc.
Shadc
Hypericum
cal cinum
y
St. Johns
Johns
to 12"
18"
Sup/
Shadc
ads
5 8 Feet
♦
Tolerant of poor coils, come
drought. Compctcs well with
trees. Muct bc in confincd space
or overtakes othcr plants. Showy
yellow flowers.
Vinca minor
Periwinkle
5"
12" 18"
Shadc
5 8 Feet
♦
Needs regular watering.
10.08.8 Planting Methods and Maintenance
Good horticultural practice should be employed in the preparation of the soil and planting
pits. This will include:
1. Conserving topsoil and replacing it on the site.
2. Performing soil tests.
3. Providing corrective soil preparation as necessary.
10.08.9 Establishment Period
The developer will be responsible for maintaining the trees and plants in the public
landscape strip, medians and entry features -in a healthy condition for one (1) year after
acceptance of the project. Because landscape strips do not usually include irrigation,
maintenance will include providing water during dry periods. Weeds, diseases, and insect
pests must also be controlled.
10.08.10 Deviations from the Landscape Strip Standards
Site conditions may occasionally make adhering to the landscape strip standards difficult.
Deviations from the standards may be requested. The following paragraphs list
circumstances that may be appropriate conditions for requesting a departure from the
design standards:
Root Direction Device: The root direction device may be omitted if the planting strip if
very wide or if the variety of tree to be planted is known to cause no sidewalk upheaval.
Grass or Ground Cover: Where it is extremely difficult to maintain grass or ground cover
in a landscape strip, heavy stone aggregate such as a washed river rock may be an
acceptable substitute. Lightweight rock such as lava rock is not acceptable. Paving over
the landscape strip will rarely is not be acceptable.
ACT.D Page 29 of 66
10.08 Landscaping
10.08.1 General Landscaping Requirements
An area devoted to landscaping is included within the right -of -way of all street
classifications. This landscape strip is an integral part of the roadway cross - section. It
serves several important functions, including improving pedestrian safety by providing a
buffer between traffic and the sidewalk; providing the perception of a narrower travel
corridor, thereby slowing traffic; improving air quality; and improving the aesthetic
appearance of the street. Located between the sidewalk and the street, landscape strips
are frequently used by pedestrians, hence they should not contain shrubs for these can
create a tripping hazard. Shrubs with a mature height not greater than 3 feet are however,
often appropriate in medians, entry features and other landscaped areas in the public right
of way not traversed by pedestrians.
The developer shall design and install the landscape strip in accordance with these design
standards. The proposed design shall be reviewed and approved by the City.
Landscape strips are required for local residential streets and residential collector streets.
The minimum width required for landscape strips is five feet (5'). Landscape strips shall be
located between the back of the curb and the sidewalk. The Developer shall provide for
and plant street trees within the landscape strip in accordance with these design
standards.
Street trees are required for principal arterials, minor arterials, non - residential collectors,
and local non - residential streets. Street trees shall be placed within the sidewalk in tree
pits with tree grates and spaced in accordance with the standards identified in section
10.08.5.1.
10.08.2 Landscape Strip Components
Landscape strips contain several components. These include soil, the plants themselves,
structural items such as root barriers and tree grates, and may include street furnishings
such as luminaries, traffic signs, bus stops or shelters, benches, and mail boxes.
10.08.3 Landscape Strip Dimensions
The roadway sections designate either five -foot (5') or five- and -a- half -foot (5'/') wide
landscape strips.
10.08.4 Plant Layers
In order to balance a safe walking environment, improved aesthetics and air quality, a
multi -layer planting approach is recommended in the landscape strip. For instance, grass
or an approved ground cover should be used at the ground level. Properly spaced trees
form the upper or canopy level. Within this general framework are many choices, outlined
in the Plant Selection section below.
In summary, the landscape strip will contain the following layers:
1. Ground Cover(s) or Grass — Required
2. Trees — Required
ACT.D Page 30 of 66
10.08.5 Trees
10.08.5.1 Placement and Spacing
Trees shall be placed so that they do not obstruct the view of any street intersection,
driveway, or visibility of any traffic control device or sign. Sight distance triangles shall
be used to analyze visibility at street intersections. Trees shall be centered in the
landscape strip. When a landscape strip is not required, trees shall be placed in tree
wells with tree grates within the sidewalk per City of Auburn Standard Detail
TRAFFIC -64.
Nearby features such as street lighting, in- ground utilities, buildings or overhead wires
will also affect where trees should be located. Minimum size for street trees shall be a
two -inch (2 ") caliper, measured two feet (2') above the root ball.
Minimum spacing for street trees should be 11/2 times the mature diameter of the tree
canopy as identified in table 10 -5A.
Planting Next to a Building: Where a building is placed close to the sidewalk, the
mature size of a tree should be considered when selecting species. Trees with a
pyramidal, columnar, or oval shaped canopy are preferable; a tree with a round head is
generally unsuitable in this situation.
Overhead Wires: When trees must be planted directly under or when the mature
canopy is within 12 feet of overhead utility lines, species with a mature maximum height
of twenty -five feet (25') must be selected.
Street Lighting: Trees need to be located at least half their mature canopy width or
twenty feet (20') from light standards, whichever is greater. Planting locations should be
coordinated with locations of lighting standards.
Street Signage: Trees shall be planted to avoid blocking the view of street signage.
Underground Utilities: Trees shall be planted so as to avoid impacts on underground
utilities
Clearance: Trees shall be pruned as they grow to provide at least seven feet (7')
vertical clearance above sidewalks and fourteen feet (14') of vertical clearance above
roadway surfaces.
10.08.5.2 Tree Canopy Shape
Tree canopy shapes are an important factor in the selection of street trees. The setting
will often dictate which canopy shapes are most appropriate. This in turn will aid in the
selection of the most suitable species.
The guidance offered below includes information about which tree canopy shapes work
best under different conditions. Table 10 -4 offers information about tree species and
their canopy shapes.
10.08.5.2.1 V- Shaped Trees
V- shaped (sometimes also called "vase shaped ") trees have canopies that are
narrow toward the bottom and broad at the top. The American Elm is a classic
street tree with this shape. V- shaped trees may have arching branches that form a
canopy over both street and sidewalk. They generally do not cause problems with
overhead power lines or traffic.
ACT.D Page 31 of 66
10.08.5.2.2 Pyramidal Trees
Pyramidal or cone - shaped trees are typically broad at the base of the canopy and
are somewhat pointed at the top. Planted close together, pyramidal trees can screen
unwanted views or create vistas. Lower branches sometimes droop with age and
may have to be limbed up in later years to provide the needed clearance.
10.08.5.2.3 Round Trees
These are generally wide spreading trees that need more space than other shapes.
10.08.5.2.4 Oval Trees
Oval trees are taller than they are wide and cause less interference with traffic.
10.08.5.2.5 Columnar Trees
Columnar trees are useful in locations where there is little available room between
the street and buildings, awnings, or other features. Branches of columnar trees
tend to grow up rather than out. Many branch lower than other types of trees without
causing problems with traffic or pedestrians.
10.08.5.3 Root Direction Devices
All street trees planted within a five -foot (5') wide landscape strip shall use a root
direction device to deflect tree roots downward into the soil. Any tree planted on public
property within 10 feet or less of a sidewalk or curb shall be planted with a root
directional device. These devices are used to eliminate damage to sidewalks as the
tree roots extend beyond the original planting pit.
The root barrier should be placed along two sides of the tree, parallel to the sidewalk
and to the curb line. Under specific circumstances, wider strips that contain utilities
may also need root barriers to reduce conflicts. Plan submissions should indicate the
location of root barriers and provide a specification sheet on the product to be used.
10.08.5.4 Tree Planting Wells and Grates
In highly urbanized settings such as downtown, it may be necessary to install street
trees into an existing street and sidewalk setting. Where high levels of pedestrian traffic
is expected, it may be necessary to place trees into a paved area rather than a
landscape strip. In these situations planting wells and grates may be necessary. The
desirable size for a tree planting well is thirty -six square feet (36 sq. ft.) or greater. A
minimum of twenty -five square feet (25 sq. ft.) should be provided.
Where trees are within a heavily traveled pedestrian area, their roots can be easily
damaged. In these areas tree grates or other means such as pavers in sand will be
required to protect the health of the tree.
Where tree wells or grates are necessary, provide planting details, specifications, and
product sheets for proposed tree - planting wells and tree grates. See Standard Details
TRAFFIC -14 and TRAFFIC -15.
ACT.D Page 32 of 66
10.08.6 Plant Selection
There are innumerable plant choices for each layer of the landscape strip. Selection is
based on:
• Size of the landscape strip
• Canopy shape of trees
• Size and type of leaves
• Root shape
• Site environmental conditions, such as the amount of sunlight available or
moisture in the soil; and
• Aesthetic qualities desired.
Needled evergreens shall NOT be used in landscape strips, unless the strips are very
wide.
10.08.7 Plant Selection Tables
Table 10 -5A provides several acceptable species of trees. Many other trees are
appropriate and alternative selections may be proposed if desired. Alternative plant
choices must be evaluated and approved by the City.
Column Headings: A short description of several of the column headings follows:
Height and Canopy Width (in feet):
Trees vary considerably in height and mature width. These dimensions are identified
per species to ensure that the right tree is being planted in the right location.
Landscape Strips/Wells and Grates and Medians:
This section identifies which species are appropriate to be planted in these locations.
Canopy Shape:
V- shaped Trees (sometimes also called "vase shaped trees ")
Pyramid Pyramidal trees or cone shaped trees
Round Round trees
Oval Oval trees
Col. Columnar trees
H2O Req. (Requirement):
Low Drought tolerant after 1st year
Mod Moderate water need. May need supplemental watering during the
dry season.
High Requires irrigation
Sun:
Sun Needs full sun
Sun /Shade Takes sun to part shade; needs at least'/ day of sun
Shade Shade to part shade. Protect from full sun, especially in afternoon
See Table 10 -5A with Tree Matrix
ACT.D Page 33 of 66
TABLE 10 -5A (TREES FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ENVIRONMENT)
Botanical
Name
Common
Name
Mature
Height
(ft.)
Mature
Canop
y
Width
(ft.)
Min.
Landscape
Strip Width
Planting OK?
Leaf
Size
Canopy
Shape
H2O
Reg
Sun
Remarks
5' -6'
>10'
Wells
&
Grates
Median
Acer campestre
Queen
Elizabeth
Maple
'Evelyn'
35
30
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Oval
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Hardy tree
Acer freemanii
Autumn
Blaze Maple
50
40
x
x
4 " -8"
Oval
Mod
Sun
Fast
Growing
Acer ginnala
Amur Maple
'Flame'
20
20
x
x
x
1.5 "-
3"
Round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Good
power line
tree.
Acer
grandidentatum
Rocky Mt
Glow Maple
'Schmidt'
25+
15
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Requires
pruning
for
clearance
Acer Nigrum
Green
Column
Maple
'Green
Column'
50
20
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Acer
platanoides
Norway
Maple
'Emerald
queen'
50
40
x
x
4 " -8"
Oval
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Popular
variety
Acer
platanoides
Norway
Maple
'Columnar
40
15
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Good
street tree
Acer rubrum
Bowhall
Maple
' Bowhall'
40
15
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Upright/
round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
tolerant of
wet soil
Acer rubrum
Scarlet
Sentinel
Maple
'Scarsen'
40
20
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
tolerant of
wet soil
Acer rubrum
Karpick
Maple
' Karpick'
35 -40
20
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Acer saccharum
Sugar Maple
'Green
Mountain'
45
35
x
x
3 " -6"
Oval
Mod
Sun/
shade/
part.
sun
Acer truncatum
xA. platanoides
Pacific
Sunset
Maple
Warrens
Red'
30
25
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Round
Mod
Sun
Good fall
colors
Amelanchierx
grandiflora
Serviceberry
'Princess
Diana'
20
15
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Upright/
round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Small
tree, red
in fall
Amelanchier x
grandiflora
Serviceberry
'Autumn
brilliance'
20
15
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Upright/
round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Resistanc
e to ice
breakage
Carpinus
betulus
Pyramidal
European
Hornbeam
'Fastigiata'
35
25
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Low
Sun/
part.
sun
Very
urban
tolerant,
good
street tree
ACT.D
Page 34 of 66
TABLE 10 -5A (TREES FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ENVIRONMENT) continued
Botanical
Name
Common
Name
Mature
Height
(ft.)
Mature
Canopy
Width
(ft.)
Min.
Landscape
Strip Width
Planting OK?
Leaf
Size
Canopy
Shape
H2O
Reg
Sun
Remarks
5' -6'
>10'
Wells
&
Grates
Median
Carpinus
betulus
Frans
Fontain
Hornbeam
35
15
x
x
x
x
2 -4"
Col
Mod
Sun
Cercidiphyllum
Japonicum
"Rotfuchs"
Red Fox
Katsura
30
16
x
x
x
x
4"
Oval
Mod
Sun
Fagus sylvatica
Green
Beech
50
40
x
x
5"
Oval
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Does not
like wet soil
Fagus sylvatica
Dawyck
Purple
Beech
' Dawyck
Purple'
40
12
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Purple
leaves
Fagus sylvatica
Red Obelisk
35
12
x
x
x
x
2 - " 4
Col
Mod
Sun
Fraxinus
americana
Ash 'Autumn
Applause'
40
25
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Oval
Low
Sun/
part.
sun
Deep red
fall colors
Fraxinus
oxycarpa
Raywood
Ash
Raywood'
45
30
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Oval
Low
Sun
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
Leprechaun
Ash
'Johnson'
18
16
x
x
x
x
2" -4"
Round
Mod
Sun
Good
power line
tree.
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
Ash
'Urbanite'
50
40
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Low
Sun
Fraxinus
pennsylvanica
Patmore Ash
Patmore'
45
35
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Oval
Low
Sun
Very good
tree
Ginko biloba
Ginko
'Autumn
Gold' (Male
Trees Only)
45
35
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Oval
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Use males
only
Ginko biloba
Ginko
'Princeton
Sentry'
(Male Trees
Only)
40
15
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Use males
only
Liriodendron
tulipefera
Tulip Tree
60
30
x
x
4 " -6"
Oval
Mod
Sun
Extremely
large tree
Lirioendron
tulipifera
Tulip tree
Arnold'
60
30
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Oval
Mod
Sun
Grows
extremely
large
Malus
"Marilee"
24
10
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Cone
Mod
Sun
No fruit.
Good
power line
tree.
Nothofagus
antartica
Southern
Beech
50
35
x
x
2 " -4"
Round
Mod
Sun
Plantus x
acerifolia
Planetree
'Yarwood'
50
40
x
6" -7"
Round
Mod
Sun
Bark
defoliates
Prunus
Mt. St.
Helens Plum
'Frankthrees'
20
20
x
x
x
x
2 " -3"
Round
Mod
Sun
Hardy tree.
Good
power line
tree.
ACT.D
Page 35 of 66
TABLE 10 -5A (TREES FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY ENVIRONMENT) continued
Botanical
Name
Common
Name
Mature
Height
(ft.)
Mature
Canopy
Width
(ft.)
Min.
Landscape
Strip Width
Planting OK?
Leaf
Size
Canopy
Shape
H2O
Reg
Sun
Remarks
5' -6'
>10'
Wells
&
Grates
Median
Prunus
Snow Goose
Cherry
'Snowgoose'
20
20
x
x
x
2" -4"
Upright
spreading
Mod
Sun
Disease
resistant.
Good power
line tree.
Prunus
cerasifera
Flowering
Plum
'Krauter
Vesuvius'
30
15
x
x
x
x
2" -4"
Round
Mod
Sun
Prunus sargentii
Cherry
Columnarus'
35
15
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Col
Mod
Sun
Fast
grower.
Prunus
serrulata
Flowering
Cherry
'Amanogowa
20
6
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Vase
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Short lived.
Good power
line tree.
Prunus x hillieri
Cherry
'Spire'
30
10
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Good fall
colors.
Prunus x
yedoensis
Flowering
Cherry
'Akebono'
25
25
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Round/
vase
Mod
Sun
Best pick for
region.
Good power
line tree.
Pyrus
calleryana
Pear
'Capital'
35
12
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Col
Mod
Sun
Susceptible
to fire blight.
Pyrus
calleryana
Pear
'Aristocrat'
40
28
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun
Susceptible
to fire blight
Pyrus
calleryana
Pear
Redspire'
35
25
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun
Susceptible
to fire blight
Pyrus
calleryana
Pear
'Autumn
Blaze'
30
25
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Round
Mod
Sun
Susceptible
to fire blight
Quercus
Crimson
Spire Oak
'Crimschmidt
45
15
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Round
Mod
Sun
Quercus robur
Skyrocket
Oak
'Fastigiata'
45
15
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Oval
Mod
Sun
Good street
tree
Styrax japonica
Japanese
Snowbell
25
25
x
2" -4"
Round
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Slow
growing.
Good power
line tree.
Tilia americana
Linden
'Redmond'
35
20
x
x
x
x
4 " -8"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
tolerant to
wet soil
Tilia cordata
Linden
'DeGroot'
30
20
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Tilia cordata
Chancelor
Linden
'Chancole'
35
20
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Good street
tree
Tilia cordata
Linden
'Greenspire'
40
30
x
x
x
x
2 " -4"
Pyramid
Mod
Sun/
part.
sun
Tolerant to
difficult
conditions
Zelkova serrata
Zelkova
Village
Green'
40
38
x
x
1 " -3"
Vase
Mod
Sun
Good tree
ACT.D
Page 36 of 66
Table 10 -5B provides several acceptable species of ground covers and, shrubs less than 3
feet high. Many other types of plants may be appropriate and alternative selections may be
proposed if desired. Alternative plant choices must be evaluated and approved by the City.
See Table 10 -5B.
TABLE 10 -5B (GROUND COVER /LOW SHRUBS)
Botanical
Name
Common Name
Mature Height
(ft.)
Minimum
Planting
Area Width
(ft.)
Sun
Obvious
Flowers
Remarks
Arctostaphylos
Una -Ursi
Kinnikinnick
Bearberry
0.5' to 1'
5 to 6'
Full sun
to partial
shade
Yes
Useful on slopes, poor
or dry soils. Slow to
establish;
must be weeded early.
Ceanothus
Gloriosus
California Wild
Lilac
1.5'
6' to 8'
Full sun
Yes
Cotoneaster
Dammeri
Bearberry
Cotoneaster
< 2'
5 to 6 '
Yes
Fast growing
Euonymus
Fortunei
Coloratus
Purple Leaf Winter
Creeper
1.5'
6' to 8'
Full sun
to light
shade
Yes
Hypericum
Calycinum
St. John's Wort
1' to 1.5'
2'
Full sun
to partial
shade
Yes
Juniperus
Horizontalis
Blue Chip
Juniper /Hughes
Juniper
1'
6' to 8'
Full sun
No
Microbiota
Decussata
Siberian Carpet
Cypress
1.5'
7 to 8'
Full sun
to light
shade
No
Rubus
Calycinoides
Evergreen
Bramble
1'
6'
Full sun
Yes
Vinca Minor
Periwinkle
0.5'
1.5'
Full sun
to partial
shade
Yes
ACT.D Page 37 of 66
10.08.8 Planting Methods and Maintenance
Good horticultural practice should be employed in the preparation of the soil and planting
pits. This will include:
1. Conserving topsoil and replacing it on the site.
2. Performing soil tests.
3. Providing corrective soil preparation as necessary.
10.08.9 Establishment Period
The developer will be responsible for maintaining the trees and plants in the public
landscape strip, medians and entry features in a healthy condition for one (1) year after
acceptance of the project. Because landscape strips do not usually include irrigation,
maintenance will include providing water during dry periods. Weeds, diseases, and insect
pests must also be controlled.
10.08.10 Deviations from the Landscape Strip Standards
Site conditions may occasionally make adhering to the landscape strip standards difficult.
Deviations from the standards may be requested. The following paragraphs list
circumstances that may be appropriate conditions for requesting a departure from the
design standards:
Grass or Ground Cover: Where it is extremely difficult to maintain grass in a landscape
strip, heavy stone aggregate such as a washed river rock may be an acceptable substitute.
Lightweight rock such as lava rock is not acceptable. Paving over the landscape strip is
not be acceptable.
ACT.D Page 38 of 66
AuBuRN ITY OF �
wAs - IENGTo
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Resolution No. 5095 August 27, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Resolution Na 5095 $0
Exhibit A
Administrative Recommendation:
Public Works Committee recommend that City Council adopts Resolution No. 5095.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5095 authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with the City of
Kent regarding Auburn's S 277th Street Corridor Project and jurisdiction over the S
277th St Corridor.
Portions of S 277th St are currently within the jurisdictions of Auburn, Kent, and King
County. This results in issues with coordination of maintenance responsibilities,
permitting requirements, and development review. Bringing the entire roadway right -
of -way from Auburn Way South to approximately 723 feet east of the L St NE
intersection into Auburn's jurisdiction will improve the ability of the City to effectively
manage the facility as well as the City's S 277th St Corridor Capacity and Non -
Motorized Trail Improvement project. This agreement with the City of Kent defines
where the future jurisdictional boundaries and maintenance responsibilities of the two
Cities along S 277th St will be, and defines the future intent for the L St NE signal and
coordination of the City of Auburn's S 277th St Corridor Project.
Staff is preparing a resolution for action later this year which will revise the corporate
boundary of the City of Auburn along S 277th St based on this agreement with the
City of Kent.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Vondrak
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: ACT.E
ACT.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 39 of 66
ACT.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 40 of 66
RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 9 5
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF KENT REGARDING AUBURN'S S
277TH STREET CORRIDOR PROJECT AND
JURISDICTION OVER THE SOUTH 277TH STREET
CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, the City's of Auburn and Kent desire to work together for the
mutual and overall benefit of the S 277th Street Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn intends to construct its project, commonly
known as the South 277th Street Corridor Capacity & Non - motorized Trail
Improvement project, and has obtained complete funding to design and
construct its project; and
WHEREAS, portions of Auburn's project abut properties located within
Kent's corporate boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Auburn's project will require widening to the south of the
existing South 277th Street roadway and Auburn does not anticipate requiring
any right of way from properties within Kent's jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, both cities intend to annex — and correspondingly de -annex —
portions of the South 277th Street Corridor to clearly define ownership and
maintenance responsibilities of the corridor; and
WHEREAS, the City of Kent and the City of Auburn are authorized to
enter into this Agreement under the authority of their respective enabling
Resolution No. 5095
August 25, 2014
Page 1
ACT.E Page 41 of 66
legislation and under the authority of Chapter 39.34 of the Revised Code of
Washington.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement
with the City of Kent, in substantial conformity with the agreement attached
hereto, marked as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement such other
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of
this legislation.
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force
upon passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day of , 2014.
CITY OF AUBURN
ATTEST:
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Resolution No. 5095
August 25, 2014
Page 2
ACT.E Page 42 of 66
EXHIBIT "A"
AGREEMENT REGARDING
S 277TH STREET CORRIDOR ROADWAY
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the City of Kent, a Washington Municipal
Corporation, located and doing business at 220 Fourth Avenue South, Kent, Washington 98032
( "Kent ") and the City of Auburn, a Washington Municipal Corporation, located and doing
business at 25 West Main Street, Auburn, Washington 98001 ( "Auburn").
RECITALS
277TH STREET CORRIDOR CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, both cities desire to work together for the mutual and overall benefit of the S
277th Street Corridor; and
WHEREAS, Kent has constructed a roadway improvement project, commonly known as
the S 277th Street Corridor Project, which commences generally from the intersection of SE
277th Street and 83rd Avenue S. (a/k/a East Valley Highway or Central Avenue or Auburn Way
North) and runs generally east across the Green River, then along SE 274th Street in Kent, and
then north along 116th Avenue SE and terminating at Kent- Kangley Road in Kent. Kent's
project included a 2 -lane roadway with a left turn between Auburn Way North and L St NE, a 5-
lane roadway between L St NE. and 108th Ave. SE, a 4 -lane roadway with a left -turn lane
between 108th Ave. SE and Kent - Kangley Road, and a non - motorized trail between L St NE and
108th Ave. SE along with a pedestrian bridge over the Green River; and
WHEREAS, Auburn, as the lead agency on its project, commonly known as the South
277th Street Corridor Capacity & Non - motorized Trail Improvement project, has obtained
complete funding to design and construct its project; and
WHEREAS, Auburn has commenced environmental review and design on its project and
intends to construct the only remaining 2 lane segment on the S 277th Street Corridor between
SR -99 and SR -18, which generally commences at the intersection of Auburn Way North and
runs east to L St NE; and
WHEREAS, Kent completed all required wetland mitigation for its previous S 277th St
1
ACT.E Page 43 of 66
C orridor Project as well as advanced wetland mitigation for Auburn's project; and
WHEREAS, Kent concurs that Auburn may utilize the advanced wetland mitigation
completed as credit towards any wetland mitigation as may be required by the regulating
agencies for completion of Auburn's S 277th St Corridor Project; and
WHEREAS, the project is a part of the S 277th St Corridor (from I -5 to SR 516) and the
cities will restrict private access to the extent possible; and
WHEREAS, Kent allowed a temporary traffic signal to be installed at L St NE to
facilitate development of the Trail Run residential plat, and the cities agree the intent was for the
signal to be removed in the future; and
WHEREAS, portions of Auburn's project abut properties located within Kent's corporate
boundaries; and
WHEREAS, Auburn's project will require widening to the south of the existing S 277th
St roadway and Auburn does not anticipate requiring any right of way from properties within
Kent's jurisdiction; and
WHEREAS, both cities intend to annex portions of the S 277th St Corridor to clearly
define ownership and maintenance responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement exists between the Valley Communications Center
and Auburn and Kent for the establishment and use of fiber optic cable and equipment along S
277th St/SE 274th Way between Auburn Way North and 108th Ave SE; and
WHEREAS, Kent intends to maintain ownership of existing conduits in the roadway and
plans for possible future water line extension through the S 277th St Corridor;
NOW, THEREFORE, Kent and Auburn hereby agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
A. AUBURN'S S. 277TH STREET CORRIDOR PROJECT
1. Auburn will be the lead agency for the overall funding, design, right of way
acquisition, permitting, construction and completion of its proposed S 277th
Street Corridor Capacity & Non - motorized Trail Improvement Project which
includes, but is not limited to:
2
ACT.E Page 44 of 66
• A five lane arterial with left -turn lanes, curb, gutter, storm drainage,
landscaping, one traffic signal, street lighting and mixed use non - motorized
trail from Auburn Way North to L St NE.
• Repair of the existing pavement from Auburn Way North to approximately
260 feet east of the L St NE intersection, and provide a minimum 2 -inch
asphalt concrete overlay over the existing pavement.
2. Auburn will continue to coordinate its design and construction efforts to match
Kent's S 277th Street Project.
3. Kent and Auburn agree that it is their mutual intent for there to be only one traffic
signal between Auburn Way North and 108th Avenue SE and that said signal
should be located at the future I St NE intersection. Once funding becomes
available for an alternate roadway connection for the Trail Run residential
development and the temporary L St NE signal is no longer needed, it is the intent
that Auburn removes the temporary signal at L St NE and any remaining
temporary pavement channelization along S 277th St./ S 274th Way.
B. KENT AND AUBURN CITY LIMIT REVISIONS
1. Kent will revise its corporate boundaries per RCW 35A.21.210 to convey its
complete jurisdiction of S. 277th St. corridor from Auburn Way North to
approximately 723 feet east of the L St NE intersection to the City of Auburn as
per the applicable portions of the attached exhibit maps "A" and "B" and the
attached legal descriptions Exhibits A -1, and B -1, B -2, B -3, B -4, and B -5.
2. Auburn will revise its corporate boundaries per RCW 35A.21.210 to incorporate
the complete jurisdiction of S. 277th St. corridor from Auburn Way North to
approximately 723 feet east of the L St NE intersection into the City of Auburn as
per the applicable portions of the attached exhibit maps "A" and "B" and the
attached legal descriptions Exhibits A -1, and B -1, B -2, B -3, B -4, and B -5.
3. Kent will retain ownership of Kent's existing conduits within the S. 277th St.
Auburn agrees to cooperate with Kent on Kent's application for a Franchise
3
ACT.E Page 45 of 66
Agreement from Auburn for its facilities, including a future water main, along S.
277th St. from Auburn Way North to approximately 723 feet east of the L St NE
intersection in the City of Auburn.
4. Kent will have jurisdiction over the S. 277th Street corridor facilities within its
corporate boundaries.
5. Auburn will have jurisdiction over the S. 277th Street corridor facilities within its
corporate boundaries.
6. Kent will retain ownership and continue to maintain the pedestrian bridge over the
Green River.
D. MISCELLANEOUS
1. Termination. This agreement shall terminate on the date that Auburn completes
construction of its S 277th Corridor Project.
2. Governing Law. This agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington. If any dispute arises between the cities
under any of the provisions of this agreement, resolution of that dispute shall be
available only through the jurisdiction, venue and rules of the King County
Superior Court, King County, Washington.
3. Modification. No waiver, alteration, or modification of any of the provisions of
this agreement shall be binding unless in writing and signed by a duly authorized
representative of each city.
4. Severability. If any one or more sections, subsections or sentences of this
agreement are held to be unconstitutional or invalid, that decision shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this agreement and the remainder shall
remain in full force and effect.
4
ACT.E Page 46 of 66
5. Entire Agreement. Written provisions and terms of this agreement, together with
any attached exhibits, supersede all prior verbal statements by any representative
of either city, and those statements shall not be construed as forming a part of or
altering in any manner this agreement. This agreement and any attached exhibits
contain the entire agreement between the parties. Should any language in any
exhibit to this agreement conflict with any language contained in this agreement,
the terms of this agreement shall prevail.
THE CITY OF KENT THE CITY OF AUBURN
SUZETTE COOK, MAYOR NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
APPROVED BY KENT CITY COUNCIL MOTION ON , 2014.
APPROVED BY AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MOTION ON , 2014
ATTEST: ATTEST:
(SEAL) (SEAL)
RONALD MOORE DANIELLE E. DASKAM
KENT CITY CLERK AUBURN CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ARTHUR FITZPATRICK DANIEL B. HEID
KENT CITY ATTORNEY AUBURN CITY ATTORNEY
5
ACT.E Page 47 of 66
3.90 1,4.00 N
L£ ON 010 ALiV38 'H'21
0
0
} O
3 ° o
00o r o
� o
0 W Y 3 W
r YU 0
U Z O
Z O O O
30�wz •
Z= 03 ° K H
�
O U
o a 0 - o
O w(70�N
Z <T0_ZZQ
D O a Y
�UNO =OW �
2 w WOO 2
Zw°ZO_r
30 �0
Oro
OS =N
ZN "002�
C.- U
ONif10w 0�i
W N ce O w W
0
2
<0100 O¢ O
a
01
0 O¢
mrzoz
O w p¢ 0 0
°l no
n ¢ Z a °
rnryO1oM¢
=rN DN
=W Z O O
W�I�OS
0
0
N
0
see 00 ON 010 ONIN "3'0
ON 310 XOO'V'M o
ul 1 0
O
_ r Olt D
_ aF
°
T.L. 936060
N
O O
,
r O
U
¢ 0
cc w
0
0
r
w
K
3N laa-0S ,,0..
0
0
0
O
0
00 -ZZ -l£ 33S L£ ON 310 00038
00 -0Z -90 030 00 ON 010 00038
80 '0N 310 X03'v'M
a 00 ON 310 X03 TM
�Py NORZNi
0
00 ON 310 01038
00 ON 010 SWIOH1 NNW
00
0
1-
E CC
2 0
W o
d Z
SQ 00
X w
Q �
ww
z
Z
W
_ Z
YN
X
W z'
D0
m�
Page 48 of 66
w
H
0
EXHIBIT A -1
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET DESCRIPTION
(AREA CURRENTLY UNDER KENT JURISDICTION IN THE VICINITY OF 86TH AVENUE
SOUTH TO BE DE- ANNEXED FROM KENT AND ANNEXED TO THE CITY AUBURN)
THOSE PORTIONS OF THE R.H. BEATTY DONATION LAND CLAIMS, NUMBERS 37
AND 44, WITHIN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST, W.M., AND
SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., IN KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTAINED IN CORRECTION QUIT CLAIM DEED
RECORDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 20121231000964,
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
O:\ Survey\ Projects \C222a \Annexation \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -1 -14 \Exhibit A -1.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 49 of 66
50 —ZZ —LC uo1PaS ,10 3N 10 awl 3
a
S /
IL L£ PLO uoiloxauuy luaN
LSZ P10 uol1oxauuy uwngn9
e
cu
0
LL€OOOYOZLLOOZ oN -aa8
1 0aOUfla IP,' lu Mid ,ad
1 WO AN PALLS l..
PROD: C222A0
EXHIBIT "B" MAP
1-
m
0
X
wE
Z
00
QE Q0
X~
ww
Z I-
< U)
Z I-
Yr
N
Z
m0
D
Page 50 of 66
w
H
0
EXHIBIT B -1
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET ANNEXATION
(PORTION OF LANDS CURRENTLY UNDER AUBURN JURISDICTION, DEEDED TO KENT BY BRISTOL
PROPERTY, LLC, IN 1996 AND TO BE DE- ANNEXED FROM AUBURN AND ANNEXED INTO KENT)
THAT PORTION THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 199612181122, LOCATED IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE W. A. COX D.L.C. NUMBER
38, WHICH POINT IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE R.H. BEATTY
D.L.C. NUMBERS 37 AND 44 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE G.E. KING
D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SOUTH
89 °00'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 638.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
199612181122;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C.
NUMBER 40 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 89 °00'01" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 987.47 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 03 °54'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF
20.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 199612181122, ALSO BEING THE
NORTH LINE OF TRAIL RUN DIVISION 1 AS RECORDED IN VOLUME 244 OF PLATS
AT PAGES 7 THROUGH 15, INCLUSIVE, UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20071204000971, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL RUN
DIVISION 1 SOUTH 89 °00'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 167.25 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL
RUN DIVISION 1 SOUTH 79 °09'27" EAST A DISTANCE OF 580.87 FEET TO THE
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS;
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS NORTH 34 °20'21" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 60.80 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS NORTH
46 °27'05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 103.07 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LANDS AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG LAST SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST A DISTANCE OF
630.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS NAD83 -91 AS DEFINED IN
RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 180 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 81
THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20041214900004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WITH THE
BEARING OF THE NORTH LINE OF G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SHOWN AS
NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST.
O:\ SURVEY\ PROJECTS\ C222A- 277thStreet (EastofAWN)\Annexation \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -14 \Exhibit B -1.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 51 of 66
EXHIBIT B -2
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET ANNEXATION
(PORTION OF LANDS CURRENTLY UNDER AUBURN JURISDICTION, DEEDED TO KENT BY
BRISTOL PROPERTY, LLC, IN 1996 AND TO BE DE- ANNEXED FROM KENT AND ANNEXED
INTO CITY OF AUBURN)
THAT PORTION THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 199612181122, LOCATED IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE W. A. COX D.L.C. NUMBER
38, WHICH POINT IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE R.H. BEATTY
D.L.C. NUMBERS 37 AND 44 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE G.E. KING
D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SOUTH
89 °00'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 638.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
199612181122 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C.
NUMBER 40 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 89 °00'01" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 987.47 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 03 °54'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF
20.07 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER 199612181122;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST A DISTANCE OF
989.47 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS;
THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LANDS NORTH 01 °48'01" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS NAD83 -91 AS DEFINED IN
RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 180 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 81
THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20041214900004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WITH THE
BEARING OF THE NORTH LINE OF G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SHOWN AS
NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST.
O:\ SURVEY\ PROJECTS\ C222A- 277thStreet (EastofAWN)\Annexation \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -14 \EXHIBIT B -2.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 52 of 66
EXHIBIT B -3
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET ANNEXATION
(AREA CURRENTLY UNDER KENT JURISDICTION TO BE ANNEXED BY AUBURN)
THAT PORTION THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 20020913001230, LOCATED IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE W. A. COX D.L.C. NUMBER 38,
WHICH POINT IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE R.H. BEATTY D.L.C.
NUMBERS 37 AND 44 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE G.E. KING D.L.C.
NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BEATTY D.L.C. NORTH 00 °34'52" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 98.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 89 °40'13" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 817.74 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 86 °05'23" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 268.24 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 86 °15'26" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 411.40 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 02 °32'06" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 143.99 FEET TO THE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB;
THENCE ALONG SAID EXSITING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB NORTH
88 °00'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 39.49 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID EXSITING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB NORTH
85 °52'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 81.11 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CURB SOUTH 03 °54'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.24 FEET
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 20020913001230, ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST A DISTANCE OF
1625.90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS NAD83 -91 AS DEFINED IN
RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 180 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 81
THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20041214900004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WITH THE
BEARING OF THE NORTH LINE OF G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SHOWN AS
NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST.
O:\ SURVEY\ PROJECTS\ C222A- 277thStreet (EastofAWN)\Annexation \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -14 \Exhibit B -3.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 53 of 66
EXHIBIT B -4
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET ANNEXATION
(AREA CURRENTLY UNDER KENT JURISDICTION TO REMAIN IN KENT)
THAT PORTION THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 20020913001230, LOCATED IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE W. A. COX D.L.C. NUMBER
38, WHICH POINT IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE R.H. BEATTY
D.L.C. NUMBERS 37 AND 44 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE G.E. KING
D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BEATTY D.L.C. NORTH 00 °34'52" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 98.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS
DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20020913001230;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 89 °40'13" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 817.74 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 86 °05'23" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 268.24 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE NORTH 86 °15'26" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 411.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 02 °32'06" EAST A DISTANCE
OF 143.99 FEET TO THE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB;
THENCE ALONG SAID EXSITING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB NORTH
88 °00'53" EAST A DISTANCE OF 39.49 FEET;
THENCE ALONG SAID EXSITING TOP BACK OF CONCRETE CURB NORTH
85 °52'22" EAST A DISTANCE OF 81.11 FEET;
THENCE LEAVING SAID CURB SOUTH 03 °54'10" EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.24 FEET
TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 20020913001230 ALSO BEING THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89 °00'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF
630.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS, ALSO BEING ON
THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROPERTY LINE OF THE LANDS CONVEYED TO KING
COUNTY AND SHOWN IN SURVEY RECORDED UNDER KING COUNTY
RECORDING NUMBER 8003079002;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE NORTH 46° 27'34" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 345.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 80 °41'11" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 274.29 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTH 86 °15'26" WEST A
DISTANCE OF 238.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS NAD83 -91 AS DEFINED IN
RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 180 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 81
THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20041214900004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WITH THE
BEARING OF THE NORTH LINE OF G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SHOWN AS
NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST.
O:\ SURVEY\ PROJECTS\ C222A- 277thStreet (EastofAWN)\Annexation \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -14 \EXHIBIT B -4.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 54 of 66
EXHIBIT B -5
AUBURN WAY NORTH AND S. 277TH STREET ANNEXATION
(PORTION OF LANDS CURRENTLY UNDER AUBURN JURISDICTION, LYING EAST OF THE LANDS
DEEDED TO KENT BY BRISTOL PROPERTY, LLC, IN 1996, TO BE DE- ANNEXED FROM AUBURN AND
ANNEXED INTO CITY OF KENT)
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 22
NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M. IN KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON LOCATED
EASTERLY OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NUMBER 199612181122, SAID PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE W. A. COX D.L.C. NUMBER
38, WHICH POINT IS ALSO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE R.H. BEATTY
D.L.C. NUMBERS 37 AND 44 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE G.E. KING
D.L.C. NUMBER 40;
THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SOUTH
89 °00'01" EAST A DISTANCE OF 638.43 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
SAID LANDS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
199612181122;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID G.E. KING D.L.C.
NUMBER 40 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 89 °00'01" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 1617.66 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH 46 °27'05" EAST A
DISTANCE OF 103.07 FEET;
THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LANDS SOUTH
34 °20'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 60.80 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF
SAID LANDS;
THENCE SOUTH 34 °20'21" EAST A DISTANCE OF 83.61 FEET TO THE
SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE DNR AQUATIC
LEASE AREA FOR EXISITING PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AS SHOWN ON RECORD OF
SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 121 OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 157, UNDER RECORDING
NUMBER 199804299002, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION NORTH 70 °40'48"
EAST A DISTANCE OF 230 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF
CITY OF AUBURN ANNEXATION ORDINANCE 2511 APPROVED DECEMBER 21,
1970 AND THE THREAD OF THE GREEN RIVER;
THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG LAST SAID EASTERLY LINE AND THE THREAD OF
THE GREEN RIVER TO THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF SAID NORTH LINE OF THE
G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID
ANNEXATION ORDINANCE 2511;
THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION, ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE
G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
ANNEXATION ORDINACE 2511 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS DESCRIPTION IS NAD83 -91 AS DEFINED IN
RECORD OF SURVEY FILED IN VOLUME 180 OF SURVEYS AT PAGES 81
THROUGH 87, INCLUSIVE AND RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NUMBER
20041214900004, RECORDS OF KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, WITH THE
BEARING OF THE NORTH LINE OF G.E. KING D.L.C. NUMBER 40 SHOWN AS
NORTH 89 °00'01" WEST.
O:\ SURVEY\ PROJECTS\ C222A- 277thStreet (EastofAWN)\AnnexatUon \Proposed KC -Kent Annex Desc Feb 2013 -14 \EXHIBIT B -5.doc 08/06/2014
ACT.E
1
Page 55 of 66
DI.0
AuBuRN ITY Cdr •
\VASH E NGTo
Agenda Subject:
Capital Project Status Report
Department:
Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Capital Project Status Report
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Date:
August 27, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Sweeting
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: DI.0
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 56 of 66
CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date: August 27, 2014
aopea;uop
F -o
Y
o
ac
Ko'v
` r
v z°
13
a
Y
-o
o
ac
luelinsuoj
uAisaa
N
o v
' o
Lu
a
z
N
1-
a
z
3
1
v)
All sites have been converted.
Punchlist, documentation, and training
is underway.
Work is underway.
Final pay in process.
Work underway.
T
fo
3
v
c
c
z
Y
O
Project
Manager
c
N
3
`
-0
O
b.
0
b.0
N
3
c
O La
J
Construction
t a/
it 0
it
‘-i <-
O
N
v)
‘-i <-
N
N
v)
‘-i <-
Q
‘-i <-
N
0
c<- -I
0
apiduaoj
o
a)
0
co
0
O
0
0
00
0
0
c
pa
a)
'6 r.
Q 0
an
O
>
O
z
(-NI
c-I
L
a)
v)
00
H
ilo
O
Q
7
-
L
N
2
r-I
c
a ;aiduaop
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total Estimated
Costs
N.
00
0
N.
7
vi
3,168,295
1,840,847
7
7
7
Ln
0
r--:
7
O
-1
Project Budget ($)
Total Budget
N
00
N
v)
vi
3,526,255
1,840,847
V
N
7
7
7
0
V)
7
O
-1
.c
5
0 t M t< t
dO O
N d N d
N O N c-I ^ N
Lip
0 0
v) c0
H
Street,
Utilities
an ^ I. r-. O
M y M a)
N N LMn N H y0
Ln ,--.
N y
N
O ,--. 7 ,--. to
D Y a, a/ N E
o M^ 3 c-1 0
O ,--. v) ^ O
7 y H a) 01 E
o N 0 3 ,-I
00 ,--.
O a)
0 v
Location/Description
This project will upgrade the City's
SCADA system to meet Public Works
goals. Budget and costs reflect
technology contract and
design /construction engineering.
Construction contract costs for the
physical site improvements are shown
separately.
This project will update /replace the
existing pump station in the Academy
water service area in order to meet fire
flow demands.
This project will complete storm, sewer,
water and street improvements related
to the Port of Seattle mitigation
agreement on D Street NE.
SCADA System Improvement - Physical
This project will complete security site
improvements at various utility locations
throughout the City. Budget and cost
numbers reflect construction contract
and contingency amounts only.
c
E.
w
`'E
w
=
Wf
V
w
m
v)
j
E
N
C a) t L T >
U U E W g j f0
a) N L O v) c-I i
N 3 ,' in o c
> a c
a'
c- c 0 CO c o
'O y- O <
E E
v Q) N o O
v o m v a)
a N V c 7 r`o
E a 7
v s . E
o 0 0 0o ,c o v
a
' y
O c a N = p 0
a a s v� v w
N •, +' U N -0 N yQ
H , - .0 3 rco in in
z°
0.
VIZS3
6060d3
LOZTd3
HbZS3
VZOTd3
0
z
c-I
N
00
7
Lf)
DI.0
Page 57 of 66
CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date: August 27, 2014
aopea;uop
Y
w Ul o O
T Ul
U
O
>
luelinsuoj
Awl
a
z
N
x
cc
O c
O
z 'g
_2 o
O V
y
o
a
z
3
iS
v,
Work is underway.
Contract documents being finalized.
Project is advertising for construction
bids. Bid opening is scheduled for
September 9th.
Project is advertising for construction
bids. Bid opening is scheduled for
September 4th.
Design is underway.
Project
Manager
CO
L'
J
E
"
Y j
C C
O
J
~
to
O
if
ra
m N
Construction
N y.
.�
LL 0
c-1
U
N
o
N
c�-1
V1
`-1
T
0
g
V1
c-I
L
0
g
a;aOw°3
o
N
to
,
a)
aa)
-0 o
ti
C
ti
Q
ti
b0
ti
b0
ti
Q
a;alduaoD
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Up
Total Estimated
Costs
O
L.0
00
co
M
c-1
01
N
c-1
0
O
V1
01
01
N
N
00
N
01
c-1
c-1
7
Project Budget ($)
Total Budget
O
L.0
00
01
M
c-1
V1
M
0
co
c-1
O
O
V1
V1
01
01
l0
7
1-
01
N
7
1-
1-
n
co
W
t
o
os
O
O
0
-1 v
Street,
Utilities
00 ,--.
L.0 N
00
N `.
-,-I •--.
�n y
p
M
c-1 `r
O _
O N
v1 N
01 `.
O0
< E
n y0
(-Li .__.
O
n E
n O
M `.
Location/Description
This project will provide safety
improvements at the intersection of 8th
Street SE and 104th Avenue SE,
including signal modifications and sight
distance improvements.
This project will construct a new building
to house a standby generator and
disinfection equipment.
This project will repair and modify
existing sanitary sewer pump station
facilities located at: F St SE, R St NE,
22nd St NE, Rainer Ridge, Valley
Meadows, 8th St NE, Area 19, North
taps, Peasley Ridge, Riverside, and
Terrace View to address access,
corrosion resistance, site security and
new generators where needed.
This project will replace the 30 -inch
storm drainage line along 30th Street NE
from the north end of the Airport to the
Brannon Park Storm Pump Station to
address localized flooding issues.
This project will construct storm
drainage improvements on Hi -Crest
Drive NW. The City is also designing and
constructing the relocation of a
Lakehaven Utility District (LUD)
Watermain that is in conflict with the
storm improvements, at LUD's expense.
z0
0
bOTTdO
VZTSJ
8OZTdD
ZZTTdD
6OTTdD
0
r-
0o
m
o
DI.0
Page 58 of 66
CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date: August 27, 2014
ao ;yea ;uop
welinsuoo
U$ISaQ
a
TD
O
Q
a
z
a
w
o_
a
z
0 z
0
a
O
°6 v
3
o To
m V
3
iS
v,
Contract documents being finalized.
Advertise and finish dates adjusted to
reflect additional time needed to
prepare final contract documents.
Design work is underway.
Design is underway. Change in
Project Managers.
Design work underway. Advertise and
finish dates adjusted to reflect
additional time needed as a result in
a change in Project Managers.
Project is advertising for construction
bids. Bid opening is scheduled for
September 9th.
Consultant design work underway.
Coordination with communications
companies underway.
Consultant design work underway.
Project
Manager
E
'O
O
Y
t
y
E
o
O
C
O
if
C
O
_
Construction
c
it 0
3
-I
2,
-
c
Q
N
Q
�
c-I
0
�
c-I
Q
�c
c-I
z
a;aiduaop
C
to
a)
a)
-6 .
Q 0
N
G
In
ti
U
0
1
Q
N
N
G
{n
ti
00
Q
1
Q
N
•i-
0
a;aiduaop
%
o
T
0
m
0
000
0
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
iLl1
Total Estimated
Costs
0
o
o
•
N
0
o
-1
o
M
1,208,722
0
0
o
k
c-
324,267
1,528,334
ti
0
m
n
ti
N
Project Budget ($)
Total Budget
00
l0
00
•
N
O
O
c-I
n
N-
N
1,233,574
O
O
O
o
l0
c-
324,267
1,528,334
`~
0
`-i
N
L
O
0 z
0
ti V
l0 0
,-.1, i
m 0
M
O b0 ^
O C
N
w (7
Street,
Utilities
co ,--.
v1 Y
7
n ,--.
V1 Y
,-.1
O ,--. O ,--. O
o y 00 N 00 E
c 0 lV O,
M ,--.
M y
1.f1
0 - - 0 - - - 1 - - -
o y 00 N '1- E
0 N- lV co N
Location/Description
This project will rehabilitate or replace
Well 1 so that it can function at full
capacity and complete modifications to
the Howard Road Corrosion Control
Facility.
complete pavement patching and
overlay treatments on arterial, collector
and local roadways for the purpose of
pavement preservation through the City.
This project will repair or replace
asbestos cement water lines along AWN,
49th and B St NW and at the M &O /Parks
Maintenance area.
This project will address utility crossings
of the BNSF right -of -way that will be
affected by the 3rd rail line that
BNSF /Sound Transit plan to building in
2015. The project will also replace a
storm drain pipe adjacent to the railroad
tracks at 37th Street.
This project includes procuring and
installing traffic signal equipment
upgrades for existing signals.
This project will provide various
improvements at the reservoir, including
painting, seismic upgrades, and facility
modifications.
This project will construct a new
detention and treatment system for
drainage at the M &O Facility and expand
and improve the existing decant facility.
2 zO
0
ST60dD
ZObTdD
6TZTdD
80£TdD
ZZ£TdD
S9LOdD
OZ£TdD
d
z
c-I
c-I
N
c-I
M
c-I
•
c-I
00
c-I
l0
c-I
0
c-I
DI.0
Page 59 of 66
CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date: August 27, 2014
ao ;yea.uop
lue;1nsuoD
u2isa4
E
ro
0_
a
Y
N
V
N
V
VI
--�
uesign is unaerway. vvorKmg on an
agreement with Kent for S 277th St
transfer of right -of -way to Auburn.
Final design underway. BNSF
permitting in process.
T
CO
0
L T CO
Q'
v v
_0
c
c
o
.3 y
a)
73 71
C 6
I N
Final design and right -of -way
acquisition underway.
Project
Manager
Y
(0
C
o
h0
C
U1
In
h0
C
N
In
h0
C
N
In
Construction
LL 0
Q
Q
N
0
U)
0
U)
0
a;aidwoj
ago
a)
l'
-0 m
Q
ti
L
2 co
a
ti
O_
in
L1
ti
C
co
L.,-,
N
C
4
a ;aIduaoD
o
00
M
0
0
01
0
N
01
0
N
01
Total Estimated
Costs
Lf1
CO
00
31
O
M
CO'
384,450
c-I
c-I
O
0■
c-I
•
c-1
M
0
1•
7
CO
•
co"
Project Budget ($)
Total Budget
L!1
00
00
al
O
M
00
384,450
c-I
Ln
1.0
0
N
L-,
c-1
L!1
0
O
n
c-I
L-,
M
W
L
U
O^
O
(0
U1
L2
00 a 00
O
00
m
~
O� (0
N
O v
OM
00
N O � O
O U1 O~
N O v OM
7 O
Lrj m~
7• M
Street,
Utilities
N
`/
01 `.
O U1
al `/
O
^ `.
U1 M Y
`/ O
O
N `. cM-I
N Ln Y O
O v 00 N M
M O
ON ` c-I •
N
11
`.
Location/Description
of S 277th from the intersection of
Auburn Way North to L Street NE,
including the construction of a
This project will complete improvements
to the rail crossing at 37th Street NW
and B Street NW to address safety
concerns.
Auburn Wav South Pedestrian
landscaped median island, a designated
mid -block crosswalk, relocation of
existing utility poles, and a u -turn at Fir
Street. This project also includes a
public education element for pedestrian
safety. This project is planned to be
constructed concurrent with project
CP1119.
This project will widen AWS between Fir
and Hemlock Streets from 3 lanes to 5
lanes and includes new sidewalks, street
lighting system, bus pull -outs, and
improvement of the Hemlock St.
intersection to include u -turns and a
new traffic signal. This project is planned
to be constructed concurrent with
project CP1118.
•
z°
0.
VZZZJ
b0£TdD
BTTTdD
6TTTdD
d
z
00
c-I
O
N
c-I
N
N
N
DI.0
Page 60 of 66
CAPITAL PROJECT STATUS REPORT
Date: August 27, 2014
ao ;yea ;uop
0
0
505 Program
1.uelinsuoD
u2isaa
=
N
V
Work is underway.
For status see CP1402.
a
Y
0)
0
i+
Design is underway.
Tr
c-I
o
0
Design is underway.
Project
Manager
C
0
co
J
C
c
Z
E
O
Y
U
Construction
L
.t
it °
l0
0
L-)
0
a ;aiduaop
%
176,083
3,046,033 I
N
W
rNi)
ai
V
3,046,033
N
-1
m
N
N
a)
176,083
Ln
ti
2,474,245
W
ai
N
Ln
ti
a ;aiduaop
o
r-
c-I
O Y 0
O j p
N > Lf1
0
Ln
M
Total Estimated
Costs
N
a)
I-
Ti-
l0
r■ls.
O
O
M
O
00
r■ls.
Project Budget ($)
Total Budget
N
a)
I-
Lri
Ti-
l0
r■ls.
CP1402, 2014 Citywide Pavement
Patching and Overlays.
2014505 Program Totals
2014 TOTAL 505 PROGRAM
O
O
O
o0
a,
00
r■ls.
W
c
U
CO .--.
O
`0 E
rn U)
00 4)
N .LL.
N
Street,
Utilities
Ti-
LO N O
N v OO
, `. LO
N
0+
--
0
O
l0
E O Y p N
O p 0 N
v 0 M `.
Location/Description
This project will construct improvements
to the intersection of AWS and
Riverwalk Drive and complete minor
This project will construct conveyance
improvements on 17th Street SE from A
Street SE to K Street SE and increase the
capacity of the existing detention pond
located on A Street SE. The project will
also replace sewer and water facilities
adjacent to the storm drain line.
z°
0.
THUD
ZOZTdD
d
z
m
N
a
N
DI.0
v
co
0
0
z
0
0
Work is underway.
For status see CP1402.
0)
0
Carter
Tr
c-I
o
0
0
0
C
c
Z
0
0
I -I
O
Lr1
l0
00
N
176,083
3,046,033 I
N
W
rNi)
ai
V
3,046,033
N
-1
m
N
N
176,083
2,474,245
2,474,245
W
ai
N
O Y 0
O j p
N > Lf1
N
v
-
—
This project will complete the
reconstruction of the following local
roadways:
K St NE - East Main to 4th St NE
CP1402, 2014 Citywide Pavement
Patching and Overlays.
2014505 Program Totals
2014 TOTAL 505 PROGRAM
CPS TOTAL'
£Z£TdD
N
Page 61 of 66
OTHER PROJECTS - ACTION BY OTHER COMMITTEE
August 27, 2014
N
0
0
N
aopea;uop
;uelinsuop
u2lsaa
N
W
on
16
16
2
s w
-
c 16
LZ
a;aiduaop
Q 0
a;aiduaop
C
0
0
by
d
C
ai
c
U
fb
CO
C
7
0
0
by
Century West
Work is underway.
Work is underway.
C
N
i
N
C
C
O
E
N
O
0
Wickstrom
U
N
0
0
z
0
7
0
0
0
0
Total
Estimated
Costs
o
o
o
ui
ka
N
-1
m
N
io
io
N
ka
a)
n
to
.
v
co
.
Location /Description
This project will complete new levee
improvements on the Fenster Levee
along the Green River.
Asphalt and crack repair, application of
a slurry seal, and striping at the Auburn
Municipal Airport.
TOTAL OTHER PROJECTS
•
o. ° z
MIND
VZ£TdD
c
z
¢
m
DI.0
Page 62 of 66
0
0
O)
GO
f0
d
DI.D
AuBuRN ITY CAF �
\VASHENG`Or,
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Significant Infrastructure Projects by Others - Public Works August 27, 2014
Status Report
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Report
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Budget Impact:
$0
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Gaub
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 63 of 66
SIGNIFICANT INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS BY OTHERS - PUBLIC WORKS STATUS REPORT
August 27, 2014
a)
Y
0
DI
Status
Work on this is nearing completion.
Work on the Phase 1 including on site utility work, East
Main Street Improvements and the New Building has been
completed. Phase 2 construction which includes the
partial demolition of the old building, additional utility
work, some remodeling, and improvements on 4th Street
NE is underway and on schedule.
Work is underway. Contractor has completed the roadway
widening and utility work. Remaining work includes
landscaping, fence installation, channelization and final punch
list.
Work is underway.
Only restoration work remains to be completed.Additional gas
main replacement may be needed.
Only restoration work remains to be completed.
Work is underway.
Anticipated
Completion
Date Per
Applicant
Late Summer
2014
LO
5
N
a)
E
E
D
CO
Summer 2014
Fall 2014
Summer 2014
Summer 2014
Spring 2015
Permit(s)
Issued
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
a)
Length
a)
a)
O)
O
a)
�- a)
} E
O O
m
Q N
z 0
3,800 Feet
400 Feet
Unknown
1000 Feet
a)
O
O
co
Location /Description
This project will replace the Reddington Levee from approximately
26th St NE to 43rd Street NE.
This project will include roadway and utility improvements to
support the new Auburn High School. Improvements include
modifications to Storm, Water and Sanitary Sewer mainlines and
roadway improvements on Main Street and 4th Street NE.
This project will complete half street roadway improvements on
124th Ave SE from SE 304th St. north to approximately SE 290th
St. for the 3rd phase of the Verdana (Bridges) Plat development
that is in Kent.
This project will complete half street roadway improvements on S
300th Street from 58th Place S. to approximately 62nd Ave. S for
the Westridge Plat development on the west hill.
This project will replace bare steel gas lines found during the
relocation efforts associated with the City's AWS and M Street
Intersection improvements.
This project will replace steel gas lines.
This project will complete half street roadway improvements to
support the Hazel Heights development. Improvements include
new street lighting and widening of 112th to include a turn lane
and sidewalks.
Sponsor/
Applicant
King County
Flood Control
District
E o V
7 0 .E
. t N
7 0 m 0 .-
Yarrow Bay
Development
PNW Holdings
LLC.
Puget Sound
Energy
Puget Sound
Energy
Alpine View
LLC
I ^ O
z
c-1
N
M
L!1
l0
1--.
a,
0
O
C
0
Y
(B
(B
Y
to
0)
t
a)
u
C
E
O
C
tB
vi
C
CU
E
a)
a)
Ca
tB
To
L)
O
v
• CU
>
O
>
—
Li
0- _
a)
L
0
u
0_
E
W N
r.
o
gage 64 of 66
DI.E
AuBuRN ITY Cdr •
\VASH E NGTo
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Action Tracking Matrix August 27, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Matrix $0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Gaub
Meeting Date: September 2, 2014 Item Number: DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 65 of 66
ca
2
wo
U
c6
0
U
a)
a)
E
0
U
0
U
d
Status
Ongoing - Quarterly updates
Consultant to complete analysis
Consultant to complete analysis. This may be a good topic for the
Spetember COW meeting.
Annual Traffic Impact Fee Update will be presented to PWC to review
and approval.
Review SR -164 Corridor Plan.
Permanent solution being developed for incorporation into future Lea
Hill Roadway widening project. Monitoring of the slope area will
continue through 2014.
Estimated
Completion
Date
Z
Cr
0
.\I
N
c-1
Cr
0
.\I
N
c-1
Cr
0
.\I
N
c-1
Cr
0
m
c-1
c-1
0
CO
Next PWC
Review Date
10/20/2014
Cr
c-1
O
N1
\
\
rn
Cr
c-1
O
N1
\
\
rn
11/17/2014
Cr
c-1
0
N1
\
c\-1
0
CO
H
Staff Lead
Sweeting
Gaub/
Fenhaus
co
a
a
fp
Item Description
Track completed project on the Current Year
Active Capital Improvement Projects Map
System Development Charges
Cost of Service Analysis
Transportation Impact Fee Structure
Analyses
Auburn Way South SR -164 Corridor Plan
Review
Lea Hill Road Repair
C
z
a
co
0
0
w
LL
Page 66 of 66
Updated: 8/27/2014 8:39 AM