HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-06-2014 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA,A BURN
N1
CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
City Council Meeting
October 6, 2014 - 7:30 PM
Auburn City Hall
AGENDA
Watch the meeting LIVE!
Watch the meeting video
M eeti ng vi deos are not avai I abl e unti 172
hours after the meeti na has concl uded.
B. Roll Call
C. Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations
1. Filipino American History Month Proclamation
Mayor Backus to proclaim the month of October 2014 as "Filipino American
History Month" in the city of Auburn.
2. Design and Construction Services for Youth Center and Community Center
at Les Gove Community Campus
Presentation by City staff and representatives from ARC Architects on
proposed professional architectural and engineering services for the Youth
Center and Community Center at Les Gove Community Campus
D. Agenda Modifications
CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Hearings
No public hearing is scheduled for this evening.
B. Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City
Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the
form provided.
C. Correspondence
There is no correspondence for Council review.
III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Municipal Services
1. September 22, 2014 Minutes* (Peloza)
B. Planning & Community Development
1. September 22, 2014 Minutes* (Holman)
Page 1 of 210
C. Public Works
1. September 15, 2014 Minutes* (Osborne)
D. Finance
1. September 15, 2014 Minutes* (Wales)
E. Les Gove Community Campus
1. The Les Gove Community Campus Committee met on October 1, 2014
(Wagner)
F. Council Operations Committee
1. The Council Operations Committee met on October 1, 2014 (Wagner)
G. Junior City Council
1. The next regular meeting of the Junior City Council is scheduled for
October 20, 2014 (Wagner)
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed.
A. Minutes of the September 15, 2014 Regular Council Meeting*
B. Minutes of the August 8, 2014 Special Council Meeting*
C. Minutes of the August 18, 2014 Special Council Meeting*
D. Minutes of the August 26, 2014 Special Council Meeting*
E. Claims Vouchers (Wales /Coleman)
Claims voucher numbers 430560 through 430756 in the amount of
$2,156,038.19 and three wire transfers in the amount of $2,060.11 and dated
October 6, 2014.
F. Payroll Vouchers (Wales /Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 534983 through 535021 in the amount of $276,267.20
and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,315,814.89 for a grand
total of $1,592,082.09 for the period covering September 11, 2014 to October 1,
2014.
G. Public Works Project No. CP1122* (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council reject all bids to Contract No. 14 -08 for Project No. CP1122, 30th
Street NE Area Flooding — Phase 1
H. Public Works Project No. CP1308* (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council award Contract No. 14 -04, to the Lowest Responsible Bidder for
Project No. CP1308, BNSF Utility Crossings
I. Public Works Project No. C524A* (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council approve Change Order No. 4 in the Amount of $10,369.73 to
Page 2 of 210
Contract No. 14 -05 for Work on Project No. C524A — SCADA Physical Site
Improvements
J. Call for Public Hearing on Preliminary 2015 -2016 Biennial Budget
(Wales /Coleman)
City Council to call for a public hearing to be held on November 17, 2014, to
receive public comments, proposals and suggestions on the 2015 -2016
Preliminary Biennial Budget.
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council approve the Consent Agenda.)
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
There is no unfinished business.
VI. NEW BUSINESS
There is no new business.
VII. ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 6530* (Peloza/Bailey)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Chapter 8.18 of the Auburn City Code relating to abandoned shopping carts
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance
No. 6530.)
B. Ordinance No. 6535* (Osborne /Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, amending
Chapter 10.36 of the Auburn City Code related to parking restrictions
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance
No. 6535.)
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 5097* (Peloza /Hursh)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, formally
accepting a grant from the Washington State Military Department in the amount
of Fifty -five Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty -four dollars ($55,724.00) from the
United States Department of Homeland Security Emergency Management
Performance Grant Program, and authorizing the Mayor to execute the
necessary agreements to accept said funds
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5097.)
B. Resolution No. 5102* (Osborne /Snyder)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing
the Mayor to execute a Wholesale Water Agreement between the City of Auburn
and the City of Tacoma
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5102.)
Page 3 of 210
C. Resolution No. 5103* (Peloza /Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing
the transfer of funds for the purpose of making a loan or loans from the Capital
Improvements Fund to the Airport Fund for up to a five -year period of time
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5103.)
D. Resolution No. 5104* (Holman /Snyder)
A Resolution of the City of Auburn, Washington, approving and authorizing
execution of an interlocal agreement with Pierce County, thereby amending the
Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies related to Annexations and Urban
Growth Area expansions
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5104.)
E. Resolution No. 5107* (Wagner /Snyder)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn Washington authorizing
the Mayor to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with ARC
Architects for architectural and engineering services for the Youth Center and
Community Center at Les Gove Community Campus
(RECOMMENDED ACTION: City Council adopt Resolution No. 5107.)
IX. REPORTS
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated
with their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations.
A. From the Council
B. From the Mayor
X. ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City
website (http: / /www.auburnwa.pov), and via e -mail. Complete agenda packets are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 4 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
September 22, 2014 Minutes
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Department: Attachments:
Police 22 _2014 M inutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Municipal Services
Councilmember: Peloza
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Date:
September 30, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Staff:
Item Number: MS.1
MS.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 5 of 210
,A BURN
CALL TO ORDER
Municipal Services Committee
September 22, 2014 - 3:30 PM
City Hall Conference Room 3
MINUTES
Chair Peloza called the meeting to order at 3:50 p.m. in Conference
Room 3 of City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Auburn, WA.
A. Roll Call
Members present: Chair Bill Peloza, Vice Chair Wayne Osborne
and Member Claude DaCorsi.
Staff present: Mayor Nancy Backus, Chief of Police Bob Lee,
Finance Director Shelley Coleman, City Attorney Dan Heid,
Emergency Preparedness Manager Sarah Miller and Police
Secretary /Scribe Heather Shaw.
Others present: Auburn Reporter representative Robert Whale.
B. Announcements
C. Agenda Modifications
II. CONSENT AGENDA
A. September 8, 2014 Minutes
The Committee recommended a revision to the proposed minutes.
Vice Chair Osborne moved to accept the Minutes as amended.
Member DaCorsi seconded. Chair Peloza concurred.
MOTION PASSED: 3 -0
III. ACTION
A. Resolution No. 5103 (Coleman)
Director Shelley Coleman presented the committee with the
proposed Resolution No. 5103. This resolution would allow for an
inter -fund loan to cover the additional project cost to the Auburn
Municipal Airport T Hangar Row 3 Enclosure project. The inter -fund
loan will be repaid with interest over a five year period with revenues
generated from rentals for the enclosed hangars being pledged to
the repayment. The committee recommended minor grammatical
revisions.
Page 1 of 4
MS.1 Page 6 of 210
Vice Chair Osborne recommended that Resolution No. 5103 to be
moved to full council for consideration as amended. Member
DaCorsi seconded. Chair Peloza concurred.
MOTION PASSED: 3 -0
B. Resolution No. 5097 (Miller)
A resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
formally accepting a grant from the Washington State Military
Department in the amount of fifty five thousand seven hundred
twenty four dollars ($55,724.00) from the United States Department
of Homeland Security Emergency Management Performance Grant
Program, and authorizing the Mayor to execute the necessary
agreements to accept said funds.
Emergency Preparedness Manager Sarah Miller briefed the
committee on the annual Emergency Management Performance
Grant which can be used exclusively for emergency management
items and activities which were not previously budgeted for. The city
uses the grant primarily for a contract employee to conduct planning
activities and provide public education activities and supplies.
Vice Chair Osborne recommended that Resolution No. 5097 to be
moved to full council for consideration as amended. Member
DaCorsi seconded. Chair Peloza concurred.
MOTION PASSED: 3 -0
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Crime Activity Report (Lee)
Police Chief Bob Lee provided a crime activity memorandum as
requested by the committee for review. The memorandum provided
details on a number of individual reports produced by the
department's crime analyst. The first report is a weekly generated
police department stat report that includes the Total Arrests, Valley
Comm CAD calls, Case Reports, Collisions and Domestic Violence
reports. Additional reports that are provided to only other law
enforcement agencies due to their confidential nature are the
Information Driven Policing Report and the Weekly /Daily Crime
Analysis Reports. The Information Driven Report is a regional &
local intelligence sharing report that is sent to other law enforcement
agencies covering: persons, locations and crime trends. The Crime
Analysis report is provided to the department on both a daily report
to officers as well as weekly. This report covers auto thefts, auto
theft recoveries, residential and commercial burglaries, theft from
vehicles and all felony crimes. The final item that Chief Lee provided
was the information on how citizens can access the city's crime
mapping feature located on the city web page. These maps will
Page 2 of 4
MS.1 Page 7 of 210
provide neighborhood data to search crimes located in the city.
Mayor Backus requested that the weekly stat report be provided in
moving forward to the Mayor's Office staff and council for review.
B. Ordinance No. 6519 (Held)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
creating a new Chapter 2.92 of the Auburn City Code, providing for
a Code of Ethics
City Attorney Dan Heid provided an updated Ordinance No. 6519
and alternate version, Ordinance No. 6524 to the committee for their
review and discussion. This topic was brought to the committee for
discussion due to a previous invitation to the council to attend a
Muckleshoot event. The state law provides that any value less than
$50.00 is permissible to city employees. The question was whether
there was a value to the admission to the event and what that value
is.
Currently the city does not have a city code of ethics for municipal
officers and therefore does not have a policy in place for determining
whether there is a benefit for public officials to attend or participate
in events, activities or functions. Chair Peloza questioned what other
surrounding cities did and if they had an ethics code. Attorney Dan
Heid indicated that many do not have an ethics code and most rely
on the state statute. Member DaCorsi referenced section 3G of
Ordinance No. 6519 and questioned how one would determine the
value of benefit to the city should a council member receive an
invitation to an event and wish to attend. Committee discussion
followed regarding what state law provided for and whether
Ordinance 6519 as written would allow city council members to
attend events if there was a benefit to the city for attendance.
Questions from the committee regarding whether the city needed an
ethics code officer and who would make up the ethics officer
followed. After committee discussion, Ordinance No. 6524 appeared
to be a more streamlined and understandable ordinance for the city
with specific revisions and re- wording as requested by the
Committee and Mayor. It was recommended by the committee that
Ordinance No. 6524 move forward with amendments to the wording.
C. Project Matrix
The following update was identified for the Project Matrix:
81: To be removed from the matrix.
V. ADJOURNMENT
The meeting was adjourned at 4:30 p.m. The next regular meeting of the
Municipal Services Committee is scheduled for Monday, October 13,
Page 3 of 4
MS.1 Page 8 of 210
2014 at 3:30 p.m. in Conference Room 3 of City Hall, 25 West Main
Street, Auburn, WA.
Signed this day of October, 2014.
Bill Peloza, Chair Heather Shaw, Police Secretary /Scribe
Page 4 of 4
MS.1 Page 9 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
September 22, 2014 Minutes
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Department: Attachments:
Planning and Development 22,2 14 M inutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember: Holman
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Date:
September 29, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Staff:
Item Number: PCD.1
PCD.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 10 of 210
'Alu,BURN
CALL TO ORDER
Planning and Community
Development
September 22, 2014 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
Chair Holman called the meeting to order at 4:59 p.m. in Annex
Conference Room 2 located on the 2nd floor of One Main Professional
Plaza, One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chair John Holman, Vice -Chair Largo Wales, and Member Yolanda
Trout were present. Also present were Mayor Nancy Backus;
Director of Community Development and Public Works Kevin
Snyder; Planning and Design Services Manager Elizabeth
Chamberlain; City Attorney Dan Heid, Planner Gary Yao; and
Community Development Services Office Assistant Sue Van Slyke.
Members of the Audience present: Robert Whale of the Auburn
Reporter.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were no agenda modifications.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes - September 8, 2014 (Chamberlain)
Member Yolanda Trout moved and Vice -Chair Largo Wales
seconded to approve the September 8, 2014 Planning and
Community Development Committee meeting minutes as written.
Motion carried unanimously. 3 -0
Page 1 of 4
PCD.1 Page 11 of 210
III. ACTION
A. Ordinance No. 6519 (Held)
City Attorney Dan Heid advised the Committee that the Municipal
Services Committee also considered Ordinance No. 6519 and No.
6524. Ordinance 6524 is an alternative to Ordinance 6519. In its
review, the Municipal Services Committee expressed preference for
Ordinance No. 6524 rather than Ordinance 6519, though they
wanted to see the language clarified and simplified. Attorney Heid
handed out a draft of Ordinance No. 6524 with changes intended to
meet the concerns and request of the Municipal Services
Committee. Attorney Heid also noted that when the packet was
created, two parts were included; Ordinance No. 6519 - an
ordinance that provided for an Ethics code and an Ethics Officer.
This Ordinance was patterned after the State of Washington law.
One noticeable difference in the state law is that the Ethics code for
State employees includes an allowance for gifts of up to $50.00. The
$50 allowance is not included in the state ethics statute for cities and
counties, and is only included in the state ethics statute for state
employees and officials. Most cities do not have a separate Ethics
code; they rely upon state law. Of those that do have an Ethics
code, the majority have an Ethics Commission rather than an Ethics
Officer. After comparison, an Ethics Officer ordinance is generally
simpler to work with. Answers are generally obtained more quickly
with a single officer than with a committee or commission. After
Committee discussion, it was determined that the Committee opted
not to go forward with either version at this time but asked that a
version that simply includes language similar to Ordinance No. 6524
with the $50.00 gift authorization be drafted and considered at the
next PCDC meeting on October 6, 2014. Attorney Heid will draft a
version that includes these components.
B. Resolution No. 5104 - Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
(Chamberlain)
Planning and Design Services Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain
presented Resolution No. 5104 which will ratify the amendments
and authorize the Mayor to execute the interlocal agreement for the
purpose of amending the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies in accordance with the requirements of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act of 1967.
Vice -Chair Wales moved and Member Trout seconded to
recommend City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5104.
Motion carried unanimously. 3 -0
Page 2 of 4
PCD.1 Page 12 of 210
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. ACC 10.36 Stopping, Standing and Parking - Phase 1 Update (Yao)
Planner Gary Yao presented modifications to existing code
language in ACC10.36 to implement 3 hour parking throughout the
downtown urban center and also to clarify the authority for
establishing time restrictions in this area. The code also
encompasses the entire City of Auburn. Planner Yao explained that
changes to the code include adding a section designating the Mayor
or designee to have the authority to establish timed parking and to
remove the section of the code that currently states which
geographic areas in the city have certain time restrictions. This
document has been presented to Engineering Services and was
accepted in it's current form. The Committee raised a question on
how street parking is determined in regards to parallel and angle
parking. Planner Yao stated there is existing language in the
code that addresses this issue and Engineering Services is currently
reviewing the code for a phase two amendment process.
Chair Holman asked that Planner Yao present copies of the
Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan to the new
council members, Yolanda Trout and Claude DaCorsi. Chair Holman
stressed that this is the baseline of how parking issues are
measured in the City of Auburn.
B. Director's Report (Chamberlain)
Planning and Design Services Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain
updated the Committee on the open Senior Planner position and
that interviews are currently being held. Director Kevin Snyder
mentioned that this is not a new position, but one that has been
vacated and is being filled along with the Urban Design Planner
position. Director Snyder explained that these are not new positions
and there is no impact to the budget concerning the hiring for these
positions.
Manager Chamberlain informed the Committee of the Fenster
Planting event which will take place on October 11, 2014. She also
mentioned that the City of Auburn has had a number of inquiries
regarding establishing businesses related to marijuana since the
1 -502 Ordinance became effective September 10, 2104.
C. PCDC Status Matrix (Chamberlain)
There were no changes recommended by the Committee to the
PCDC Status matrix.
Page 3 of 4
PCD.1 Page 13 of 210
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Planning and
Community Development Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 5:43
p. M.
Approved this day of
John Holman, Chair
Sue Van Slyke, Office Assistant
Page 4 of 4
PCD.1 Page 14 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
September 15, 2014 Minutes
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Department: Attachments:
Public Works Draft M inutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
See attached draft minutes.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember: Osborne
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Staff:
Date:
September 29, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
1 ■i
PW.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 15 of 210
,A BURN
VVASM�N N (A "()
i '
CALL TO ORDER
Public Works Committee
September 15, 2014 - 3:30 PM
Annex Conference Room 2
MINUTES
Chairman Wayne Osborne called the meeting to order at 3:30 p.m. in
Conference Room #2, located on the second floor of Auburn City Hall,
One East Main Street, Auburn, Washington.
A. Roll Call
Chairman Wayne Osborne, Vice -Chair Bill Peloza, and Member
Claude DaCorsi were present. Also present during the meeting
were: Community Development & Public Works Director Kevin
Snyder, Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Ingrid Gaub,
Assistant City Engineer Jacob Sweeting, Capital Projects Manager
Ryan Vondrak, Acting Utilities Engineer Susan Fenhaus,
Engineering Aide Amber Mund, Project Engineer Kim Truong,
Project Engineer Seth Wickstrom, Project Engineer Luis Barba,
Street Systems Engineer Jai Carter, Planning & Design Services
Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain and Public Works Secretary Molly
Mendez.
Members of the public in attendance included: Eric Clayton, Sean
Senescall and Chris McMeen.
B. Announcements
There were no announcements.
C. Agenda Modifications
There were two agenda modifications which replaced the existing
packet materials for Action Item D, Public Works Project No.
CP1322 and Action Item E, Public Works Project No. CP1208.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
Public Works Committee to approve the minutes of the September
2, 2014 Public Works Committee meeting
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee approve the Public Works Committee Meeting
minutes for date, September 2, 2014.
Page 1 of 7
PW.1 Page 16 of 210
Motion carried 3 -0.
III. ACTION
A. Ordinance No. 6513 (Mund)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
granting to Electric Lightwave, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc, a Deleware Corporation, a franchise
for telecommunications type of utility
Engineering Aide Mund explained Ordinance No. 6513 is a franchise
agreement for Electric Lightwave LLC. Mund mentioned the public
hearing for this ordinance was held two weeks ago at the City
Council meeting.
There were no questions from the Committee.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6513 for
Franchise Agreement No. 13 -28 for Electric Lightwave LLC.
Motion carried 3 -0.
B. Resolution No. 5100 (Carter)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
Authorizing the Mayor to Award and Execute a Construction
Contract with the Lowest Responsible Bidder for Construction of
Community Development and Public Works Contract Number 14 -22
for Project CP1410, 2014 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project
Street Systems Engineer Carter stated Resolution No. 5100
authorizes the Mayor to award and execute a construction contract
with the lowest responsible bidder for construction of public works
contract number 14 -11 for Project CP1410, 2014 Arterial and
Collector Crack Seal Project. The bid opening is scheduled for
September 16, 2014. Allowing the Mayor to award the contract will
save approximately three weeks which will allow this project to be
completed this year as the work is weather dependent.
There were no questions from the Committee.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee adopt Resolution No. 5100.
Motion carried 3 -0.
C. Public Works Project No. CP1409 (Wickstrom)
Grant permission to initiate Project No. CP1409, Oravetz PI SE
Flooding Mitigation
Page 2 of 7
PW.1 Page 17 of 210
Project Engineer Wickstrom explained staff is seeking permission to
initiate Project No. CP1409, Oravetz Place SE Flooding Mitigation.
The purpose of the project is to mitigate flooding problems occurring
near the Danner Corporation property located at 307 Oravetz Place
SE. The work will consist of installing approximately 500 feet of a
new storm drainage line across the City's property currently being
used by the Auburn Valley Humane Society (4910 A Street SE) and
connecting into the existing storm drainage system on A Street SE.
Construction of this project is anticipated to start November 2014.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee grant permission to initiate Project No. CP1409,
Oravetz Place SE Flooding Mitigation.
Motion carried 3 -0.
D. Public Works Project No. CP1322 (Barba)
Approve Award of Contract No. 14 -16, to the Lowest Responsible
Bidder for Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal Improvements
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub advised the
Committee of the Agenda Modification which replaces the existing
packet materials for Action Item D, Public Works Project No.
CP1322.
Project Engineer Barba stated staff is seeking approval to award
Contract 14 -16 to American Electrical Services on their low bid for
Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal Improvements.
Chairman Osborne noted that the bid came in 7% below the
Engineers Estimate.
There were no questions from the Committee.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee approve award of Contract No. 14 -16, to
American Electrical Services on their low bid of $132,711.00 for
Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal Improvements.
Motion carried 3 -0.
E. Public Works Project No. CP1208 (Truong)
Approve Award of Contract No. 14 -10, to the Lowest Responsible
Bidder for Project No. CP1208, Sewer Pump Station Improvements
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub advised the
Committee of the Agenda Modification which replaces the existing
packet materials for Action Item E, Public Works Project No.
CP1208.
Page 3 of 7
PW.1 Page 18 of 210
Project Engineer Truong explained staff is seeking approval to
award Contract No. 14 -10 to R. L. Alia Company on their low bid for
Project No. CP1208, Sewer Pump Station Improvements.
There was a group discussion regarding the budget of this project
following a question asked by Chairman Osborne.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee approve award of Contract No. 14 -10, to R. L.
Alia Company on their low bid of $994,822.00 plus Washington
State sales tax of $94,452.09 for a total contract price of
$1,089,274.09 for Project No. CP1208, Sewer Pump Station
Improvements.
Motion carried 3 -0.
F. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -453 ( Fenhaus)
Grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -453
with FCS Group for preparation of the Financial Chapters in the
Water, Sewer, and Storm Water Comprehensive Plans
Acting Utility Engineer Fenhaus explained this agreement will allow
FCS Group to prepare the Financial Chapters in the water, sewer
and storm drainage Comprehensive Plans.
There were no questions from the Committee.
It was moved by Vice -Chair Peloza, seconded by Member DaCorsi,
that the Committee grant permission to enter into Consultant
Agreement No. AG -C -453 with FCS Group for preparation of the
Financial Chapters in the Water, Sewer, and Storm Water
Comprehensive Plans.
Motion carried, 3 -0.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. ACC 10.36 Stopping, Standing and Parking — Phase 1 Update
(Yao)
Discussion of removing code - specified restricted (timed) parking
zones and loading zones and adding code clarifying administrative
authority to establish parking restrictions to implement 3 -hour timed
parking and improve parking policy transparency per the
Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan (CDPMP)
adopted by Resolution 5031.
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed after
Discussion Item B.
Page 4 of 7
PW.1 Page 19 of 210
Planning & Design Services Manager Chamberlain provided a brief
background summary of ACC 10.36 Stopping, Standing and Parking
— Phase 1.
Following a question asked by Chairman Osborne, Planning &
Design Services Manager Chamberlain spoke regarding the
authority to designate parking restrictions on page 61 of the packet
This was followed by a group discussion.
There was a group conversation regarding the timed parking zones
specifications and locations.
B. Tacoma Water Agreement ( Fenhaus)
For the purpose of these minutes, this item was discussed prior to
Discussion Item A.
Acting Utility Engineer Fenhaus brought two guests to the table and
introduced Chris McMeen and Sean Senescall who are representing
the Tacoma Water Utility.
Acting Utility Engineer Fenhaus provided a brief background
summary of the various Tacoma and Cascade Agreements that are
in place and the proposed Tacoma Water Agreement.
There was a short group discussion.
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub responded to
a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza regarding a termination
clause and that it is not necessary for this agreement as the City can
choose not to take any water and will not incur costs. Community
Development and Public Works Director Snyder also noted that this
agreement has been reviewed by Risk Management and the City
Attorney.
Mr. McMeen explained how the 5.12 MGD and 4.92 MGD for peak -
period were calculated on page 139 of the packet following a
question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza.
In response to a question asked by Vice -Chair Peloza, Mr. McMeen
explained requirements that Tacoma has in scheduling the amount
of water they plan to take and how the timing of the scheduling on
page 143 of the packet relates to that.
C. Capital Project Status Report (Sweeting)
Assistant City Engineer Sweeting mentioned bids opened for this
project on September 2nd and were significantly higher than
Page 5 of 7
PW.1 Page 20 of 210
anticipated. Therefore, staff is preparing a recommendation to reject
all bids and re- advertise the project in the spring of 2015.
Item 16 — CP1402 — 2014 Citywide Pavement Patching and Overlay
Project:
Assistant City Engineer Sweeting provided the Committee with an
updated status of the project and stated bidding is projected to go
out in December 2014 or January 2015.
Item 18 — CP1109 — 2011 Storm Pipeline Repair and Replacement,
Phase 2:
Assistant City Engineer Sweeting noted the advertisement of this
project has been withheld until January 2015 in order to try and get
into the more favorable bidding and construction season.
Item 20 — CP1119 — Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements — Fir
St. SE to Hemlock St. SE:
Assistant City Engineer Sweeting indicated he has reached out to
the FAA and left a phone message explaining what the current
status was and is waiting to hear back. This was done per the
request of Chairman Osborne to make contact with the FAA.
D. Significant Infrastructure Projects by Others - Public Works Status
Report (Gaub)
Item 3 — 124th Ave SE Half Street Road Improvements:
Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer Gaub confirmed this
project is nearing completion following a question asked by
Chairman Osborne.
E. Action Tracking Matrix (Gaub)
Chairman Osborne requested to add the wash boarding area on
105th Place SE at 107th to the Matrix. Staff will review the current
plans and consult with the Mayor and then report back to the
Committee.
V. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Public Works
Committee, the meeting was adjourned at 4 :22 p.m.
Approved this 6th day of October, 2014.
Wayne Osborne Molly Mendez
Chairman Public Works Department Secretary
Page 6 of 7
PW.1 Page 21 of 210
Page 7 of 7
PW.1 Page 22 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
September 15, 2014 Minutes
Department: Attachments:
Administration Minutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember: Wales
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Date:
September 30, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Staff:
Item Number: FN.1
FN.1 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 23 of 210
ACITY 01:
0"BUIRN
VVA,S,II I N, G'111F() N
CALL TO ORDER
Finance Committee
September 15, 2014 - 5:00 PM
Annex Conference Room 1
MINUTES
Chair Largo Wales called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in Annex
Conference Room 1 located on the second floor of the City Hall Annex at 1
East Main Street in Auburn.
A. Roll Call
Chair Wales, Vice Chair John Holman, and Member Yolanda Trout
were present.
Officials and staff members present included: Finance Director Shelley
Coleman, Assistant City Attorney Doug Ruth, Community Development
and Public Works Director Kevin Snyder, Water Utility Engineer Susan
Fenhaus, Assistant Director of Engineering Services /City Engineer
Ingrid Gaub, Street Systems Engineer Jai Carter, and City Clerk
Danielle Daskam.
B. Announcements
There was no announcement.
C. Agenda Modifications
There was no change to the agenda.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Minutes of the September 2, 2014 Regular Meeting
Vice Chair Holman moved and Member Trout seconded to approve the
September 2, 2014 minutes.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3 -0
B. Claim Vouchers (Coleman)
Claims voucher numbers 430385 through 430559 in the amount of
$3,550,727.11 and three wire transfers in the amount of $708,217.47
and dated September 15, 2014.
Committee members reviewed the claims and payroll vouchers and
briefly discussed wire transfer number 196 payable to US Army Corps
Engineers related to Mill Creek Wetland Restoration Project.
Vice Chair Holman moved and Member Trout seconded to approve the
Page 1 of 3
FN.1 Page 24 of 210
claims and payroll vouchers.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3 -0
C. Payroll Vouchers (Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 534951 through 534981 in the amount of
$833,860.67 and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of
$1,280,862.61 for a grand total of $2,114,723.28 for the period covering
August 28, 2014 to September 10, 2014.
See claims vouchers above for approval of payroll vouchers.
III. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Resolution No. 5100 (Carter)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor to award and execute a construction contract with
the lowest responsible bidder for construction of Community
Development and Public Works Contract Number 14 -22 for Project
CP1410, 2014 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project
Street Systems Engineer Jai Carter presented Resolution No. 5100.
Resolution No. 5100 would authorize the Mayor to award and execute a
construction contract with the lowest responsible bidder for construction
of Public Works Contract No. 14 -11 for Project CP1410, 2014 Arterial
and Collector Crack Seal project. The bid opening is scheduled for
September 16, 2014. Allowing the Mayor to award the contract
will ensure the project proceeds as soon as possible and be completed
this year as the work is weather dependent.
The 2014 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project includes the
approximately 9.5 lane miles of arterial and collector roadways that will
be crack sealed.
Engineer Carter estimated bids may range from $68,000.00 to
$88,000.00.
B. Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersection Improvements
In response to questions from Committee members, Assistant Director
of Engineering Services /City Engineer Ingrid Gaub provided a brief
update on Public Works Project CP1024, the Auburn Way South and M
Street SE Intersection Improvements. The project will add a turn lane
and eliminate the restriction of no right turn on red from Auburn Way to
M Street northbound. The contractor is currently working on
underground work and has encountered issues going under Auburn
Way South. The project is anticipated to be complete in December
2014.
C. Tacoma Water Agreement ( Fenhaus)
Water Utility Engineer Susan Fenhaus presented information on the
proposed Tacoma Water Agreement. In 2012, the City signed an
Page 2 of 3
FN.1 Page 25 of 210
agreement with Tacoma Water for wholesale water service up to 1.0
million gallons per day (MGD) average annual daily water use. The City
is currently taking this quantity of water from the B Street NW Intertie.
In 2013, the City signed an agreement with Cascade Water Alliance to
purchase 2.5 MGD of Tacoma water. This would be accomplished by
paying Cascade Water Alliance the system development charges
Cascade Water previously paid to Tacoma.
The proposed agreement combines both existing agreements into one
for a total of 3.5 MGD wholesale water service.
The proposed agreement will be presented to the full Council at a future
date.
IV. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting
adjourned at 5:16 p.m.
APPROVED this day of October, 2014.
LARGO WALES, CHAIR Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
Page 3 of 3
FN.1 Page 26 of 210
C i..i,y C�1:
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the September 15, 2014 Regular Council
Meeting
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
Minutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Staff:
Date:
September 30, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Item Number: CA.A
CA.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 27 of 210
AUB q N
CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
City Council Meeting
September 15, 2014 - 7:30 PM
Auburn City Hall
MINUTES
Mayor Nancy Backus called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. and led those
in attendance in the Pledge of Allegiance.
B. Roll Call
City Councilmembers present: Bill Peloza, Largo Wales, Wayne Osborne,
John Holman, Claude DaCorsi, and Yolanda Trout. Deputy Mayor Wagner
was excused.
Department Directors and staff members present included: Police Chief Bob
Lee, City Attorney Daniel B. Heid, Finance Director Shelley Coleman,
Community Development and Public Works Director Kevin Snyder, Planning
and Design Services Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Public Affairs and
Marketing Liaison Dana Hinman, Economic Development Manager Doug
Lein, Director of Administration Michael Hursh, and City Clerk Danielle
Daskam.
C. Announcements, Appointments, and Presentations
There was no announcement or presentation.
D. Agenda Modifications
Revised documents related to Consent Agenda Items IV.D and IV.E, Public
Works Project Numbers CP1208 and CP1322 were distributed prior to the
meeting.
CITIZEN INPUT, PUBLIC HEARINGS & CORRESPONDENCE
A. Public Hearings
2015 -2016 Preliminary Biennial Budget (Wales /Coleman)
City Council to conduct a public hearing on the 2015 -2016 Preliminary
Biennial Budget
Using PowerPoint slides, Finance Director Coleman gave a brief
presentation on the 2015 -2016 Preliminary Biennial Budget Planning
and General Fund Revenues.
Director Coleman reviewed property assessed valuation. She noted
there was a 20.8% cumulative rate of decline in property valuation
between 2009 and 2013. The year 2014 saw an increase in assessed
value of approximately 5.5 %; and 10% annual increases in property
valuation are projected for 2015 and 2016.
Page 1 of 6
CA.A Page 28 of 210
Director Coleman reviewed the property tax levy for the years 2012,
2013 and 2014. The 2015 levy is estimated at $16.8 million and
includes funding for six additional staff members. New staff positions
include a police bike officer for downtown, a Police records specialist, a
major crime analyst, an IT staff member dedicated to the Police
Department, a code enforcement officer, and a property
analyst. Funding for the additional staff members is approximately
$600,000 annually.
Finance Director Coleman also presented information on historical
assessed value and levy rates and a recap of General Fund revenues.
The proposed budget includes a 2.2% average annual increase in
General Fund revenues in 2015 and 2016.
Mayor Backus opened the public hearing at 7:40 p.m. No one in the
audience requested to speak regarding the proposed budget, and the
hearing was closed.
B. Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the
City Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on
the form provided.
Nick Abdelnour, representing Polygon Northwest, 11 6x SE 5th Street,
Bellevue
Mr. Abdelnour spoke on behalf of Polygon Northwest Company and
urged Council support of Ordinance No. 6531 relating to Polygon's request
for a rezone.
Elam Anderson, 3xx 23rd Street SE, Auburn
Mr. Anderson spoke regarding the proposed youth center at Les Gove
Community Campus.
C. Correspondence
There was no correspondence for City Council review.
III. COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Municipal Services
Chair Peloza reported the Municipal Services Committee met September 8,
2014. The Committee received an update on the transfer of the DARE
program to the Auburn School District. The Committee reviewed Resolution
No. 5093, which declares the DARE vehicle surplus and allows its transfer to
the school district. The Committee also discussed the Auburn Municipal
Airport T- hangar Enclosure project. The next regular meeting of the
Municipal Services Committee is scheduled for September 22, 2014.
B. Planning & Community Development
Chair Holman reported the Planning and Community Development
Committee met September 8, 2014. The Committee received a presentation
from Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Faber and Park Board Chair
Michael Hassen on the 2014 Board activities. The Committee
also discussed the revised Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
Page 2 of 6
CA.A Page 29 of 210
and "Investing in Place," which focuses on old and new amenities,
beautification, and design to support economic development in the downtown
area. The next regular meeting of the Planning and Community
Development Committee is scheduled for September 22, 2014.
C. Public Works
Chair Osborne reported the Public Works Committee met this afternoon at
3:30. The Committee reviewed Ordinance No. 6513 granting a
telecommunications franchise to Electric Lightwave LLC and Resolution
No. 5100 authorizing the Mayor to award and execute a contract for Project
CP1410, the 2014 Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project. The Committee
also approved initiation of Project CP1409, the Oravetz Place SE Flooding
Mitigation, award of Project No. CP1322, the Annual Traffic Signal
Improvements, to the lowest responsible bidder, award of Project No.
CP1208, the Sewer Pump Station Improvements, to the lowest responsible
bidder, and Consultant Services Agreement No. AG -C -453 with FCS Group
for preparation of the financial chapters in the Water, Sewer and Stormwater
Comprehensive Plans. The Committee discussed Chapter 10.36 of the City
Code related to parking, the Tacoma Water Agreements, the capital project
status report, significant infrastructure projects by others, the Committee
action tracking matrix, and the pavement washboarding at 105th Place SE
and 107th. The next regular meeting of the Public Works Committee is
scheduled for October 6, 2014.
D. Finance
Chair Wales reported the Finance Committee met this evening at 5:00. The
Committee reviewed claims vouchers in the amount of $4.2 million and
payroll vouchers in the amount of $2.1 million. The Committee
discussed Resolution No. 5100 authorizing the Mayor to award and execute
a contract with the lowest responsible bidder for Project CP1410, the 2014
Arterial and Collector Crack Seal Project, and Tacoma Water Agreements.
The next regular meeting of the Finance Committee is scheduled for October
6, 2014.
E. Les Gove Community Campus
The next meeting of the Les Gove Community Campus Committee meeting
is scheduled for October 1, 2014.
F. Council Operations Committee
The next regular meeting of the Council Operations Committee is scheduled
for September 22, 2014.
G. Junior City Council
Mayor Backus reported the Junior City Council met this evening. The Junior
City Council discussed appointments to the Junior City Council and their anti -
bullying campaign, which is proposed to be focused in elementary and
middle schools.
IV. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed.
Page 3 of 6
CA.A Page 30 of 210
A. Minutes of the September 2, 2014 Regular Meeting
B. Claim Vouchers (Wales /Coleman)
Claims voucher numbers 430385 through 430559 in the amount of
$3,550,727.11 and three wire transfers in the amount of $708,217.47 and
dated September 15, 2014.
C. Payroll Vouchers (Wales /Coleman)
Payroll check numbers 534951 through 534981 in the amount of
$833,860.67 and electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of
$1,280,862.61 for a grand total of $2,114,723.28 for the period covering
August 28, 2014 to September 10, 2014.
D. Public Works Project No. CP1208 (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council award Contract No. 14 -10, to R. L. Alia Company on their low
bid of $994,822.00 plus Washington State sales tax of $94,452.09 for a total
of $1,089,274.09 for Project No. CP1208, Sewer Pump Station
Improvements
E. Public Works Project No. CP1322 (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council award Contract No. 14 -16, to American Electrical Services on
their low bid of $132,711.00 for Project No. CP1322, Annual Traffic Signal
Improvements
F. Public Works Consultant Agreement No. AG -C -453 (Osborne /Snyder)
City Council grant permission to enter into Consultant Agreement No. AG -C-
453 with FCS Group for preparation of the Financial Chapters in the Water,
Sewer, and Storm Water Comprehensive Plans.
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember Wales seconded to
approve the Consent Agenda.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0
V. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Ordinance No. 6519 (Held)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, creating
a new Chapter 2.92 of the Auburn City Code, providing for a Code of Ethics
Councilmember Holman moved to refer Ordinance Nos. 6519 and 6524 to
the Planning and Community Development Committee and Municipal
Services Committee for review. Councilmember Wales seconded.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0
VI. NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business.
VII. ORDINANCES
A. Ordinance No. 6513 (Osborne /Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, granting
to Electric Lightwave, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Integra Telecom
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, a franchise for telecommunications
type of utility
Page 4 of 6
CA.A Page 31 of 210
Councilmember Osborne moved and Councilmember Peloza seconded to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6513.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0
B. Ordinance No. 6531 (Holman /Snyder)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
approving the request of Polygon Northwest Company for a rezone from R -5
Residential to R -7 Residential 7 DU /ACRE to implement the Comprehensive
Plan and amending the City's Zoning Maps accordingly
Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Wales seconded to
introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6531.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0
VIII. RESOLUTIONS
A. Resolution No. 5093 (Peloza /Held)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, declaring
a certain item of property as surplus and authorizing its disposal
Councilmember Peloza moved and Councilmember Osborne seconded to
adopt Resolution No. 5093.
LVi[01 [e] 0 [_ V V 1210 Rol 0I.1011►Vi[01916yWR01 X
B. Resolution No. 5100 (Osborne /Snyder)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington,
authorizing the Mayor to award and execute a construction contract with the
lowest responsible bidder for construction of Community Development
and Public Works Contract Number 14 -22 for Project CP1410, 2014 Arterial
and Collector Crack Seal Project
Councilmember Osborne moved and Councilmember Peloza seconded to
adopt Resolution No. 5100.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6 -0
IX. REPORTS
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated
with their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations.
A. From the Council
Councilmember Trout reported on her attendance at the Senior Center coffee
hour and the Fenster Levee project and natural park tour.
Councilmember Osborne reported on his attendance at the Regional Water
Quality Committee meeting, the Valley Regional Fire Authority Board of
Governance meeting, and a reception honoring Poet Laureate Dick Brugger.
Councilmember Peloza reported on his attendance at the National League of
Cities Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Steering Committee
meetings held in Fort Collins, Colorado. Councilmember Peloza also
reported on his attendance at the King County Solid Waste Advisory Board
Page 5 of 6
CA.A Page 32 of 210
meeting, the dedication of Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) 9
Seahurst Park in Burien, the Wesley Homes groundbreaking, the Auburn
High School dedication, the Green /Duwamish Watershed media
announcement by King County Executive Constantine and Seattle Mayor Ed
Murray, Poet Laureate Dick Brugger's reception, and the Fenster Levee
project tour.
Councilmember Holman reported on his attendance at the Green River
Community College Foundation Veterans Initiative Breakfast and the SCORE
Jail Employee Appreciation and Awards Day barbecue.
Councilmember Wales commented on the lack of funding for public health
services in South King County. Councilmember Wales reported on
the upcoming King County Board of Health meeting, and she encouraged all
to contact King County Executive Constantine's office to support health
services funding in South King County.
Councilmember DaCorsi reported he attended many of the events
already reported by Councilmembers.
B. From the Mayor
Mayor Backus conveyed a belated happy birthday to Councilmember Trout,
who celebrated her birthday on September 9, and a happy birthday to
Councilmember Osborne, who will celebrate his birthday on September
29th. Mayor Backus reported on her attendance at a tour of the U -line facility
in Auburn; the monthly City and Auburn Area Chamber of
Commerce meeting where discussion included retail marijuana locations in
the city, 2015 -2016 budget processes, strategies for improving exterior
appearances; the City's planning for a summit of downtown businesses on
Main and in the Downtown Urban Center; the Fenster Levee project tour; the
Lowes' employee celebration at the Auburn store; a groundbreaking for
the new health center at Wesley Homes; a reception honoring Poet Laureate
Dick Brugger; a Regional Transportation Summit; and the Hops & Crops
event at Mary Olson Farm.
X. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting adjourned
at 8:29 p.m.
APPROVED this day of October, 2014.
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
Page 6 of 6
CA.A Page 33 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S p � I N G "i'(
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the August 8, 2014 Special Council Meeting
Department: Attachments:
Administration ®2®274 s ai e Minut
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Staff:
Date:
September 15, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
1 •-
CA.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 34 of 210
A C, V IN 01ar
, Bu-KN
CALL TO ORDER
Special City Council Meeting
August 12, 2014 - 2:00 PM
MINUTES
Mayor Nancy Backus called the special meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
Councilmembers in attendance included: Deputy Mayor Rich
Wagner,Wayne Osborne, Claude DaCorsi, Largo Wales, Yolanda Trout,
Bill Peloza.
Councilmember Holman was excused.
Department directors and staff members present included: Police Chief
Bob Lee, City Attorney Dan Heid, Community Development and Public
Works Director Kevin Snyder, Human Resources and Risk Management
Director Rob Roscoe, Administrative Services Director Michael Hursh,
Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber, Permits and
Administration Manager Darcie Hanson, Planning and Design Services
Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Assistant Director of Public Works
Services Randy Bailey, Innovation and Technology Customer Support
Manager Reba Stowe, Innovation and Technology Secretary Melissa
Medisch, Assistant Police Chief Bill Pierson, Environmental Services
Manager Chris Andersen, Public Affairs and Marketing Liaison Dana
Hinman, Financial Planning Manager Bob Brooks, Financial Analyst
Tamara Baker and Deputy City Clerk Shawn Campbell.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. 2015 - 2016 General Fund Preliminary Budget Review
Mayor Backus stated she wants an understandable and transparent
budget. The department directors have worked together to have a
understanding of the entire budget, not only their own department's
budget.
Councilmember Osborne noted one of his top priorities is economic
development, he would like to see more emphasis on economic
development. Mayor Backus stated the administration has added
economic development into the priorities throughout the
City. Councilmember Wales asked for the Directors to highlight where
the economic development aspects have been added to their budget.
She also requested the Directors highlight the areas they have made
cuts or streamlined processes.
Page 1 of 3
CAB Page 35 of 210
Director Coleman noted when preparing the budget, the Finance
Department estimated the expected revenue and the costs of raising
health care and pension contributions. The plan for the budget is
to continue existing services, support the City workforce,
conservative financial planning and end 2016 with a reserve balance.
Director Coleman explained by the end of 2016, the City
anticipates having $2.7 million in banked capacity for property tax
revenue.
Councilmembers asked about healthcare cost to employees and the
accumulative reserve fund.
Director Hursh presented Council with the Council and Mayor's
budget. He reviewed the departmental organizational chart and the
department overview from the budget.
Council discussed the Junior City Council, Study Sessions, developing
a better working relationship with the Muckleshoot Tribe, continuing to
develop the Auburn Municipal Airport, economic development, Amtrak
kiosks, organization dues for staff, Council retreats, National League
of Cities, facility allocation costs to each department, lobbyist
consultants and travel expenses for Mayor and staff.
Direcotor Hursh presented Council with the Administration
Department budget.
Council discussed Community Services, Sister Cities, emergency
housing, emergency management, Economic Development, the
Innovation Partnership Zone (IPZ), Community Block Grant Funding
and Human Services.
Mayor Backus explained to Council the Administration has spread
economic development throughout all of the City departments. Each
department has staff with specialized expertise. Using the expertise
of the staff throughout the City gives citizens, developers and
investors better customer service and quicker results ensuring the City
will be successful with economic development regardless of the
current economic state. Council shared concerns about ensuring
enough emphasis is placed on economic development.
Director Hursh presented Council with the Emergency Management
budget.
Council discussed Emergency Management supplies.
Director Hursh presented Council with the budget for the 119 Fund
that includes the Community Development Block Grant. He reviewed
the objectives and accomplishments for the fund.
Page 2 of 3
CAB Page 36 of 210
Council discussed the services and needs in the community that are
funded through this fund, transitional housing, small business
assistance center and medical and dental care.
Director Hursh presented Council with the Facilities budget. He
reviewed the accomplishments and objectives of the Facilities
Department.
Council discussed the need for a facilities and property analyst,
property purchases, and the facility maintenance schedule.
Director Hursh presented the Multi media budget. He reviewed the
accomplishments and objectives presented in the budget.
B. 2015 - 2016 Other Funds Preliminary Budget Review
See 2015 - 2016 General Fund Preliminary Budget Review above.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
adjourned at 4:28 p.m.
APPROVED this day of October, 2014.
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR Shawn Campbell, Deputy City Clerk
Page 3 of 3
CAB Page 37 of 210
AC Coq'
'lu,BURN
VVA,S p � I N G "i'(
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the August 18, 2014 Special Council Meeting
Department: Attachments:
Administration ®1 ®2014 al meeflngrd nset
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Staff:
Date:
September 24, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Item Number: CA. C
CA.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 38 of 210
A C, V IN 01ar
, Bu-KN
CALL TO ORDER
Special City Council Meeting
August 18, 2014 - 6:45 PM
Auburn City Hall
MINUTES
Mayor Nancy Backus called the special meeting to order at 6:45 p.m.
Councilmembers in attendance included: Deputy Mayor Rich Wagner,
Wayne Osborne, Claude DaCorsi, Largo Wales, John Holman, Yolanda
Trout and Bill Peloza.
Department directors and staff members present included: Police
Commander Mark Cailler, City Attorney Dan Heid, Community
Development and Public Works Director Kevin Snyder, Human Resources
and Risk Management Director Rob Roscoe, Director of Administration
Michael Hursh, Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber,
Innovation and Technology Customer Support Manager Reba Stowe, and
Deputy City Clerk Shawn Campbell.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Special Presentation for Proposed Youth and Teen Center /Community
Center Concept (Snyder)
Directors Snyder and Faber presented the proposed Youth and Teen
Community Center concept. Staff has been looking at alternatives to
the community center proposal that Council voted against earlier this
year. The current proposal includes expanding the Parks buildings at
the north end of the Les Gove Community Campus to incorporate a
youth and teen center, a senior fitness center, and additional meeting
space. Additional parking would have to be added as part of the
project.
Director Snyder presented a proposed schedule for the
project. The City's goal it to have construction start by September
2015 and opening the facility by June 2016. Staff plans to use
the Junior City Council and the Auburn Youth Council to help get
feedback from youth in the community.
Deputy Mayor Wagner asked if the City would be able to get an
extension on the grant funds awarded from the State of Washington.
Director Snyder stated if Council is supportive staff will make a formal
request to extend the grant deadline. Councilmember Wales asked
about the budget for operation costs. Director Faber said the Council
would see the operational costs in a mid budget correction if the
Page 1 of 2
CAL Page 39 of 210
project moves forward. The funding sources previously identified for
the project will still be available. Councilmember Holman stated he
likes the youth and teen center concept. He stated the City could
look for grants focusing on gang prevention, tutoring
and operations. Council asked if the facility would be self supporting.
Director Faber explained even with fees for events and activities the
facility will still need to be supported from the General Fund.
Director Snyder stated the City would have an architectural firm create
a more accurate concept drawing. Councilmember DaCorsi requested
updated information at each step of the process. Councilmember
Wales requested the City work with the school district to involve them
in the process.
Council asked questions regarding the bidding process and
selecting an architectural firm that has experience with youth centers.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
adjourned at 7:12 p.m.
APPROVED this day of October, 2014.
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR Shawn Campbell, Deputy City Clerk
Page 2 of 2
CAL Page 40 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S p � I N G "i'(
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the August 26, 2014 Special Council Meeting
Department: Attachments:
Administration ®2®2014 minutes
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014
Staff:
Date:
September 24, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
1 •-
CAL AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 41 of 210
A C, V IN 01ar
, Bu-KN
CALL TO ORDER
Special City Council Meeting
August 26, 2014 - 2:00 PM
City Hall Council Chambers
MINUTES
Mayor Nancy Backus called the special meeting to order at 2:00 p.m.
Councilmembers in attendance included: Deputy Mayor Rich Wagner,
Wayne Osborne, Claude DaCorsi, John Holman, Largo Wales and Bill
Peloza.
Councilmember Trout was excused.
Department directors and staff members present included: Police Chief
Bob Lee, City Attorney Dan Heid, Human Resources and Risk
Management Director Rob Roscoe, Director of Administration Michael
Hursh, Parks, Arts and Recreation Director Daryl Faber, Community
Development and Public Works Director Kevin Snyder, Development
Services Manager Jeff Tate, Permits and Administration Manager Darcie
Hanson, Planning and Design Services Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain,
Transportation Manager Pablo Para, Assistant Director of Public Works
Services Randy Bailey, Innovation and Technology Director Ron
Tiedeman, Innovation and Technology Operations Manager Ashley
Riggs, Innovation and Technology Customer Support Manager Reba
Stowe, Finance Director Shelley Coleman, Financial Planning Manager
Bob Brooks, Financial Analyst Tamara Baker and Deputy City Clerk
Shawn Campbell.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. 2015 - 2016 Biennial Budget Review
Budget documents can be viewed from the August 12, 2014 Special
City Council Meeting Agenda.
Director Roscoe presented the Human Resources, Risk and Property
Management budget. He shared the department organizational chart
and the 2013 - 2014 accomplishments. He also presented the 2015 -
2016 department goals, objectives and performance measures.
Council discussed the City's self- insured worker comp program, the
2% reduction in health insurance premiums the City earned by
becoming a Well City through Association of Washington Cities,
personal development for staff, employee participation the leadership
institute, training for City staff, the tuition
reimbursement program, recruitment programs, employee benefits,
Page 1 of 2
CAD Page 42 of 210
work schedules, participation in the National League of Cities
prescription drug program, the light duty return to work program for the
Police Department, a safety officer, the overall cost for step increases
and negotiated raises for employees, costs to the City for the public
defender contract and King County District Court, King County District
Court performance measures, the electronic home monitoring
system, and the City's deductible for insurances losses and insurance
claims.
Director Coleman introduced the Finance Department Budget. She
reviewed the funds the department oversees, the staff organizational
chart and performance measures.
The Council asked about the Finance Department staffing levels,
repayment of a library bond, Traffic and School Impact Fees, Parks
Mitigation fees, phase 2 of the City Hall remodel and future phases,
additional funding for parks, sidewalk repair, the availability of grant
funds, walkable city planning, REET 1 and REET 2 funds and their
limitations, working with the school district and placing cameras in
school zones, traffic signal improvements, costs of replacement of
traffic signal equipment, updating the storefronts of businesses on
Main Street, customer service satisfaction for waste management,
enclosing one T hanger at the Auburn Municipal Airport, LEOFF 1
members, benefits and premiums, the firefighters pension fund, fees
paid for bank card transactions, dues for associations and increases
to the fees paid to the Auburn Valley Humane Society.
City Attorney Heid presented the Legal Department Budget. He
reviewed the department organizational chart.
Council asked about staffing levels in the Legal Department, legal
assistance to the public to interpret the City Code, contracting legal
services with neighboring jurisdictions and public records requests.
III. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
adjourned at 4:17 p.m.
APPROVED this day of October, 2014.
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
Shawn Campbell, Deputy City Clerk
Page 2 of 2
CAD Page 43 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
Claims Vouchers
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
October 1, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Finance No Attachments Available $0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve claims vouchers.
Background Summary:
Claims voucher numbers 430560 through 430756 in the amount of $2,156,038.19
and three wire transfers in the amount of $2,060.11 and dated October 6, 2014.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance
Councilmember: Wales Staff: Coleman
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.E
CA.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 44 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
Payroll Vouchers
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
October 1, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Finance No Attachments Available $0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve the payroll vouchers.
Background Summary:
Payroll check numbers 534983 through 535021 in the amount of $276,267.20 and
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $1,315,814.89 for a grand total of
$1,592,082.09 for the period covering September 11, 2014 to October 1, 2014.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance
Councilmember: Wales Staff: Coleman
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.F
CA.F AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 45 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVAS p � I N G "i'(
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1122
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 30, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Budget Status Sheet $0
Bid Tab
vim ityMa�p
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council reject all bids to Contract No. 14 -08 for Project No. CP1122, 30th Street
NE Area Flooding Phase 1.
Background Summary:
The purpose of this project is to design and construct a new 42 -inch storm line from
the northwest corner of the airport property to the existing Brannan Park Pump
Station. The pipe will replace the existing 30 -inch storm pipe generally located along
30th Street NE and the northerly boundary of Brannan Park. The project will relieve
street flooding that results from the limited capacity of the existing 30 -inch line to
convey the storm water to its current Brannan Park Pump Station discharge point. The
project also includes street preservation improvements along 30th Street NE as part of
the Arterial Preservation Program.
Bids were opened on September 4, 2014, seven bids were received with the bid range
of $4,872,457.62 to $6,711,772.92 (tax included). The lowest responsive bid was
approximately 12% ($874,712.24) above the Engineers Estimate, which exceeds the
available funds for this project. Therefore, City Staff recommends rejecting all bids in
the best interest of the City and re- advertise the project in the Spring of 2015. It is
anticipated that a Spring advertisement will provide for a more favorable bidding and
construction season.
The total Storm Fund budget for this project is $4,400,702.00. If this contract was to
be awarded, it would require a budget adjustment of approximately $872,458.00.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne
Staff: Snyder
CA.G AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 46 of 210
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.G
CA.G AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 47 of 210
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: CP1122 Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding - PHASE 1
Project Manager: Kim Truong
0 Consultant Agreement
Initiation Date: 1/7/13 0 Permision to Advertise Date: 09/23/14
Advertisement Date: 6/16/14 Contract Award
Award Date: Change Order Approval
0 Budget Update
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding
Prior Years
2012
2013
2014
2015
Total
432 Fund - Storm (Public Works Trust Fund)
49
12,362
26608
4,100,000
10,000
4,110,000
432 Fund - Storm
49
12,362
278,291
80,000
1 10,000
290,702
102 Arterial Street Fund
0
0
312
250,000
1 0
250,000
Total
49
12,362
278,291
4,350,000
10,000
4,650,702
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Activity
Prior Years
2012
2013
2014
2015
Total
Design Engineering - City Costs
49
12,362
26608
30,000
(10,000)
69,020
Design Engineering - Consultant
49
12,362
251370
80,000
1 10,000
331,370
Permits
0
0
312
0
1 0
312
Construction Estimate
0
0
0
4,872,458
1 0
4,872,458
Project Contingency
150,000
150,000
Construction Engineering - Consultant
30,000
30,000
Construction Engineering - City Costs
1 60,000
1 10,000
1 70,000
Total
49
12,362
278,291
1 5,222,458
1 10,000
1 5,523,160
432 Storm Budget Status
102 Arterial Street
Prior Years 2012 2013
Prior Years
2012
2013
2014
2015
Total
*432 Funds Budgeted ()
(49)
(12,362)
(278,291)
(4,100,000)
(10,000)
(4,400,702)
432 Funds Needed
49
12,362
278,291
1 4,972,458
1 10,000
5,273,160
*432 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
(0)1
0
1 0
1 0
432 Funds Required
0
0
0
1 872,458
1 0
1 872,458
102 Arterial Street
Prior Years 2012 2013
Budget Status
2014
Total
*102 Funds Budgeted ()
0
0
0
1 (250,000)
(250,000)
102 Funds Needed
0
0
0
250,000
250,000
*102 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
0
102 Funds Required
0
0
0
0
0
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
CA.G Page 48 of 210
BID TABULATION
BID TOTALS SUMMARY
Project Name: CP1122, 30th Street NB Area Flooding -Phase 1, Contract 14 -08
Prepared by: City of Auburn
Bid Date: 914114
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE: $ 3,997,745.38
AVERAGE BASIC BID AMOUNT: $ 5,304,702.33
BASIC BID SPREAD AMOUNT: $ 1,672,003.25 Basic BID Amount Spread $ Spread %
LOW BIDDER: Road Construction NW $ 4,485,316.75 $487,571.37 12.20%
Second Bidder: Pacific Civil & Infrastructure $ 4,569,112.00 $571,366.62 14.29%
Basic BID (Tax not Included)
Road Construction NW
$
4,485,316.75
Pacific Civil & Infrastructure
$
4,569,112.00
R.L. Alia Company
$
4,994,818.50
Rodarte Construction
$
5,349,818.50
Frank Colluccio Construction
$
5,679,395.00
James W. Fowler Company
$
5,897,135.55
Marshbank Construction
$
6,157,320.00
Total BID (Tax Included)
$
4,872,457.62
$
4,975,397.41
$
5,450,828.29
$
5,820,842.61
$
6,174,577.28
$
6,427,708.77
$
6,71 1,772.92
9/4/2014 (5:05 PM)
MGgj\bidcabs\CP1122 BT.sls Page 49 of 210 14
Z, 7 F H T N E
. ............ - — ------------- ............ ....................
t z
.1UH =T NE
Ld
Ll
q1v
su�oa
L . ...........
3 OILPI T ' N I ' 7
A— T-N4: NIE
�01
Rill I 1 1111111111111,111,11
lYr
1"N'Yw,,
BRANNAN
FIARK
h E
_r
72
q V) vi
2
1'.
r) Phase 1 J
E L.fll
� 7t�L�
Project Area,
IJJ LU
:7 0
Lr
Z'4TH 'I YWk
NE
AUBURN
MUNICIPAL
, 11 NE
AIR ..............
ru
—rLP NL-
E F7
Z LJ
LLL 5-
uJ
LETLLL.L�$ WL 7 H1 'J E
NL
rl
LL
F�7 NF
U
5�' T N F �T 5 T 11 i S 4E
br,
S,, N W
14
f
..............
...................
Vicinity Map
30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1
)"URN
CA.G NOT TO -------------------- FaORT'S . 776-21'6
'Alu,BURN
VVA,S p � I N G "i'(
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1308
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 30, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Budget Status Sheet $0
VidnityMa
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council award Contract No. 14 -04, to the Lowest Responsible Bidder for Project
No. CP1308 BNSF Utility Crossings.
Background Summary:
This project will construct utility improvements required by the Burlington Northern
Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) to accommodate the new BNSF 3rd rail line that will extend
within Auburn's City limits from Ellingson Road to South 277th Street along the west
side of the existing north -south tracks. This work must be completed by the City as
BNSF is the underlying owner of the Right -of -Way. BNSF requires that all utilities are
constructed in casings to protect them from train loadings and to allow maintenance
and replacement without impacting rail traffic. Several City utilities that cross the rail
alignment were constructed prior to the implementation of BNSF's casing requirement
and are not encased adequately to address the proposed 3rd rail. This project will
replace these utilities in casings that meet BNSF requirements and construct the
associated roadway and other surface restoration.
Because the bid opening was held on September 30, 2014. There was not adequate
time for staff to compile the bid tabulation to include in the agenda packet. A revised
agenda bill specifying the contractor and contract amount will be distributed to the
Committee and Council at their meetings scheduled for October 6, 2014.
Updated information regarding the budget status will be presented with the revised
agenda bill.
The estimated total project cost for water improvements is $780,001.00, which is
equal to the amount budgeted within the Water Fund for the project.
CA.H AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 51 of 210
The estimated total project cost for sewer improvements is $441,000.00, which is
equal to the amount budgeted within the Sewer Fund for the project.
A project increase of $20,000.00 within the Storm Fund will be necessary, however it
will not require a budget adjustment since it is anticipated that the budgeted
expenditures in the Storm Funds will not be exceeded this year.
A project increase of $420,000.00 within the Arterial Preservation Fund will be
necessary, however it will not require a budget adjustment since it is anticipated that
the budgeted expenditures in the Transportation Funds will not be exceeded this year.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.H
CA.H AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 52 of 210
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: CP1308 Project Title: BNSF Utility Crossings
Project Manager: Kim Truong Date: 9/23/14
Initiation Date: 5/13/13
0 Permision to Advertise
Advertisement Date: 9/2/14
* Contract Award
Award Date:
0 Change Order Approval
0
0 Budget Update
The "Future Years" column indicates the projected amount to be requested in future budgets.
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
430 Fund- Water (Bond Proceeds)
0
51,357
728,644
780,001
431 Fund - Sewer
0
14,440
426,560
441,000
432 Fund - Storm Drainage (Bond Proceeds)
0
42,328
523,773
566,101
105 Fund - Arterial Preservation
0
0
0
0
Total
0
108,125
1,678,977
1,787,102
Activity
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
City Design
0
26,683
23,949
50,632
Consultant Design
0
85,341
137,581
222,922
Construction Contract
0
0
1,686,779
1,686,779
Authorized Contingency
0
0
181,200
181,200
BNSF Permits
0
0
44,469
44,469
Construction Engineering
0
0
45,000
45,000
Total
0
112,024
2,118,977
2,231,001
430 Water Budget Status
431 Sewer Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
1 2014
1 Total
'430 Funds Budgeted()
0
(51,357)
(728,644)
(780,001)
430 Funds Needed
0
51,357
728,644
1 780,001
"430 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
(0)
(0)
430 Funds Required
0
0
0
1 0
431 Sewer Budget Status
432 Storm Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
'431 Funds Budgeted ()
0
(14,440)
(426,560)
(441,000)
431 Funds Needed
0
14,440
426,560
441,000
"431 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
431 Funds Required
0
0
0
0
432 Storm Budget Status
105 Arterial Preservation Budget Status
Prior Years
2013 (actual)
1 2014
1 Total
'432 Funds Budgeted()
0
(42,328)
(523,773)
(566,101)
432 Funds Needed
0
42,328
543,773
586,101
"432 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
432 Funds Required
0
0
20,000
20,000
105 Arterial Preservation Budget Status
( # in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
CA. Page 53 of 210
Prior Years
1 2013 (actual)
2014
Total
'105 Funds Budgeted ()
0
0
0
0
105 Funds Needed
0
0
420,000
420,000
"105 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
105 Funds Required
0
0
420,000
420,000
( # in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
CA. Page 53 of 210
PROJECT SITE #3
(37th Street NW) _
r—Jm L-- sr Nw I I (.II..
V 1
d
w Q
14th
ST NW
01
PROJECT SITE #2
(3rd Street NW) —
a I ly // .1 9
VT. VIE W
METERY
PROJECT SITE #1 w
(Main Street) d �;
r-
In
U
30th ST NW
t
Il-
LEGEND
— W WATER MAIN CROSSING
— ST — STORM DRAINAGE CROSSING
— SS — SANITARY SEWER CROSSING
W
PAM
Z
K
NE t
Z
ST a r
NE
ST NE K
17th
ith ST NE 18th
z lii
AUBURN
GOLF
COURSE
a sra a
�A
/ 8th
e.�� 'ab
°
PROJECT SITE #4
tF
-'
�, 7th
S
NE
9th
Mop
Bth NE
SUPERMALL
10th
6, U �' k PARK
d
B
11th
o
q w YMCA
� r
12th ST
� WELL 6
PARK
13TH
14th
w
16th
Y ST P
4sr
ww
PI
o
BOUNDARY BLVD 04 G.S.
P
VH1
vtn e
°
r
PuL ER
e u
AY
DI 6 `
ST
CITY OF
AD BURN VICINITY MAP
August 2014
Pa.
aW
d
U
VETERANS
ArR
PMLi
ata R °
V
W
W
ST
b
PARR A
PARK K =WE
L 2
ath'
Ng
d
4th
ST
NE
F
3rd NE
a
AUBURN
a K
=—Z
r
HIGH
an
s
ar
1st
F
6
d z
e
1st
SCHOOL ti
LtL
BT
z
0
a
z
R P %
Q
MAIN
a
z
E
D
2nd
u
/ 8th
e.�� 'ab
°
PROJECT SITE #4
8th ST
3W
�, 7th
I (!Jac k Diamond Rd)�
9th
Mop
SUPERMALL
10th
6, U �' k PARK
d
M & O
11th
o
q w YMCA
12th ST
v
16t1h, ST SW
13TH
14th
w
16th
SE
e %
°
BOUNDARY BLVD 04 G.S.
P
VH1
18th
SE m
17th ST '° SE
AVE N
AY
DI 6 `
BNSF UTILITY CROSSINGS PROJECT
CITY OF
AD BURN VICINITY MAP
August 2014
WASHINGTON
W NOT TO SCALE N
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N'
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. C524A
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 30, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Public Works Budget Status Sheet $0
SCADAWNRyM�p
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council approve Change Order No. 4 in the amount of $10,369.73 to Contract
No. 14 -05 for work on Project No. C524A SCADA Physical Site Improvements.
Background Summary:
The Physical Site Improvements construction contract is a part of the SCADA
Upgrades project and is constructing security upgrades including site fencing,
equipment panel shelters, gates, and other enhancements at various sewer, storm,
and water facilities throughout the City.
Change Order No. 4 accounts for modifications to the planned equipment shelters at
two storm pump station facilities. These modifications are needed to accommodate
existing utilities that were not accounted for in the original design.
A project increase of $9,395.00 within the 432 Storm Utility Fund will be necessary to
fund the change order, however, it will not require a budget adjustment due to the
deferment of other projects funded by the 432 fund.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.I
CA.I AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 55 of 210
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
Project No: C524A Project Title: SCADA System Improvements
Project Manager: Jacob Sweeting
Initiation Date: 3/5/2007
Advertisement Date: 3/18/2014
Award Date: 2/22/2011 (Tech Contract)
0 Project Initiation
0 Permision to Advertise Physical Imp Date: September 16, 2014
d Consultant Agreement
Change Order Approval
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Funding
2011 (actual)
2012 (actual)
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
430 Fund - Water
657,779
1,669,604
358,616
588,790
3,274,789
431 Fund -Sewer
329,737
1,044,185
234,409
306,666
1,914,997
432 Fund - Storm
151,347
443,060
145,531
136,833
876,771
431 Fund - Emergency Sewer Repairs
0
0
0
20,000
20,000
Total
1,138,863
3,156,849
738,556
1,052,289
6,086,557
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Activity
2011 (actual)
2012 (actual)
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
Design Engineering City
14,285
17,150
561
3,329
35,325
Technology Contract
1,107,440
3,065,875
679,219
330,602
5,183,136
Physical Site Security Construction Contract
0
0
0
518,500
518,500
Physical Site Security Contract - Change Order 1 - Emergency Repairs (Sewer)
0
0
0
15,000
15,000
Physical Site Security Contract - Change Order 2 - Additional Fence (Water)
27,469
27,469
Physical Site Security Contract - Change Order 3 - Emergency Repairs (Sewer)
5,000
5,000
Physical Site Security Contract - Change Order 4 - Shelter Modifications (Storm)
10,370
10,370
Remaining Physical Security Imp. Contingency (5%)
0
0
0
15,905
15,905
Construction Engineering
17,138
1 73,824
1 58,776
1 124,000
1 273,738
Total
1,138,863
1 3,156,849
1 738,556
1 992,336
1 6,026,604
430 Water Budget Status
431 Sewer Budget Status
2011 (actual)
2012 (actual)
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
430 Funds Budgeted ()
(657,779)
(1,669,604)
(358,616)
(588,790)
(3,274,789)
430 Funds Needed
657,779
1,669,604
358,616
1 577,408
1 3,263,407
*430 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
1 (11,382)
(11,382)
430 Funds Required
0
0
0
1 0
1 0
431 Sewer Budget Status
432 Storm Budget Status
2011 (actual)
2012 (actual)
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
*431 Funds Budgeted ()
(329,737)
(1,044,185)
(234,409)
(326,666)
(1,934,997)
431 Funds Needed
329,737
1,044,185
234,409
1 326,539
1 1,934,870
*431 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
1 (127)
(127)
431 Funds Required
0
0
0
1 0
1 0
432 Storm Budget Status
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
1of1
\PROJ \C524A- SCADAImp \Budget \C524A BudgetStatusSheet.xls P nt Date: 1 201
A.I Rage o 210
2011 (actual)
2012 (actual)
2013 (actual)
2014
Total
432 Funds Budgeted ()
(151,347)
(443,060)
(145,531)
(136,833)
(876,771)
432 Funds Needed
151,347
443,060
145,531
146,228
886,166
*432 Fund Project Contingency ()
0
0
0
0
0
432 Funds Required
0
0
0
9,395
9,395
* ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
1of1
\PROJ \C524A- SCADAImp \Budget \C524A BudgetStatusSheet.xls P nt Date: 1 201
A.I Rage o 210
SCADA Utility Sites
.- - -- - __,�..=y_--____ - - ,
, � ,
,
� � ` � � . _y r-
� �-i� � � i � - -�,��,,,�� - - -�
� 1 � � i i � ` _
� _ _ _._�__ _ _ 1 � .
I � 1 � ' � V�PHn . ,_ . �\` I—I , ' � � I
� 1_ �_� I ,.. ` i
�
t _ _ � I ` .n,i . — I_� _-_ _ _— _
�� 1
� �f I mi,��.,,�. � � ' `�
� /� � ....,� I � /
1 . . .inieschw »r«sr.nE . � I � !
1 I 1 /
, = i I _ �
: �
. G . n�-�..,.. . 1 /
x � �
� �167 I BHPNNAN . I I S /
� PARK � � i
, /
' =l ^ /
� GNEFN � ���'
� �`o RIVEP � � � � �EA ��
� 3 p
5 •GREEN I \ ! INTEaili: �:q�°"nsr,
� ° ' RIVER ...�,ifk 0F -� LEf �
1 i . � : '-/' ::Nr ,�.,w�ws '�'�' Hiu _
1 „ � 3 SivFFI lEH �NItRiIF
� i� j( � : mu I
� iHrEatit �
' ue
se �
� -�'�-��"���nx�h.�, vV"wp0� � u�i�nnsr /
� . . a � � wrx�.xe �
/
�� ��mun� w � �: � a H t• aroeasioF� �
a I ... I �' O h � I ..�IL... �
' � /� J-�••�� � �. N $IH!!1 \ _ i.:��, I I i� i �
' ;z t�HILI '
�t. �.�i.�r � � lfS� F ... � ��
� WEI I ItFSk HVUIF /
� _� WELL ' ' � '
I �
� � �. �. WFLL ,. � ��
' , \ ♦ I_ _ J
WEST s \ \
MPIN � � � � I
� / f w,mixar---__. i : � _.[wxs� . _ . . . . . � ' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ '�
��5• : / NUB�HN I � � �
�1� t . I p S�SW WAY ` �
y � �. _ )� — T—�iXSliE� . ,\•
� '�.: i *HI FT_.�. S� _.. � ... �
� ��- . 1._�$� � '7_ ." _' � . .
� y _ I`
� t'^ Mniursrunrvc[ --we�"—".u>o.oiuw.uxose.
' 6
OVEPiTONS WELL . '
� � ' �
�
, __.. ,,,�,,,w... . ---- '
.._ F iii �,.... I
1 r.enosw� � STREET ' �
' �� �� a[%�xone �' 4J . . IORxsii[
ACFDEMT I'
l � .�\ �' I . . �1 t
�� COAL ���p(:QOfMY `�
�� I � CREEN -_ �
( � ° WELL C I �RESEPVOIRW.:f . .-. . '+ueuvxwms- . �y
/
`I � s i � S� 1�. �� _ .� � �
� w p�
� � �
I ' I�� --'�9iXlI;E �._-I � ` 1
1 J . WIL�ENNE55 �
GHMt �
� � �� Wl11 FAHM 4!'.HUI.Mv
� — � Ilq
� w�i i !P �� . JaNSCN
]I, �fq� nOUi1NN �
I FCADEMY . � . I
i
I Mti '
L _ �
� I�il ti5�_ .._. ./I f
� �Mil�ul,l ti� F� � . �
�.�67 �ee.i.csw•xo�� :�wn ..__, � � , _ ' _ _'_' _�
W�' "�� �
'wiiru ��� � �
ei'vri� g* !
�j � nriuiimwr>pn(;�� yHnuNw000 �
�'� [SI/\IFS tSlP�tb
� H1.]LHVUIH �
� �� �
i
� � � � ��l__., �'�.. `♦
.. .. - II WELL �
f WELL 5q �
1'. . ' S \
�
� -� - �j LFHELAND �
'' LFNELANDt� HILLS � � — � � � � � � � � � — � — � � � � — � — � � _ � _ � � � � _a
MLL$ \ 5
nl.a, I � �
, l
weu I
� �IC� sa '. �., �� �
. �c�_ 1
`II� HFS[HVOiF ' � � � �
'+F4 stl
. . '�\`��l9p Ri ` �iSLMxFx.�� '
� ��� I
� � i
i - - -i - - - - - � i - - - ''
r — +
I — �
0 Sewer Siphons Water Pump Stations � _ _ Auburn Ciry Limits
_ _�
� � Sewer Pump Stations Water Reservoirs ' � Potential Annexation Areas .. � ✓ �1� �
II 1
Srorm Pump Stations Water Wells ��
CA.I Page 57 of 210 ;;., , ' ,;;.'
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N1
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Call for Public Hearing on Preliminary 2015 -2016 Biennial September 22, 2014
Budget
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Finance No Attachments Available $0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council to call for a public hearing to be held on November 17, 2014, to receive
public comments, proposals and suggestions on the 2015 -2016 Preliminary Biennial
Budget.
Background Summary:
All persons interested are encouraged to participate in this public hearing by making
comments, proposals, and suggestions to the City Council and Mayor to consider prior
to adoption of the City of Auburn's 2015 -2016 Biennial Budget.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember: Wales Staff: Coleman
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: CA.J
CA.J AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 58 of 210
C i..i,y C�1:
VVA,S I � I N G "i'(')N'
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6530
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Department: Attachments:
Police Ordinanw No. 6530
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6530.
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Municipal Services
Date:
September 22, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
Councilmember: Peloza Staff: Bailey
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: ORD.A
ORD.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 59 of 210
ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 3 0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER 8.18
OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO
ABANDONED SHOPPING CARTS
WHEREAS, the current provisions of the Auburn City Code provide for a mechanism
whereby the City shall impound abandoned shopping carts and hold them until retrieved by the
owner or disposed of in accordance with the City Code; and
WHEREAS, there are instances when it may not be necessary or productive to impound
shopping carts; and
WHEREAS, it is therefore appropriate to amend the "mandatory" enforcement language
regarding impoundment, yet keeping that language in the City Code as an "option" of
enforcement for abandoned shopping carts.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. The provisions of chapter 8.18 of the
Auburn City Code be, and the same hereby are, amended to read as follows:
Chapter 8.18
ABANDONED SHOPPING CARTS
Sections:
8.18.010
Definitions.
8.18.020
Findings — Purpose.
8.18.030
Regulations_.
8.18.040
Nuisance— Enforcement.
8.18.010 Definitions.
The definitions set forth in this section shall govern the application and
interpretation of this chapter:
A. "Abandoned shopping cart' means any cart that has been removed,
without written consent of the owner, from the owner's business premises and is located
on either public or private property.
Ordinance No. 6530
August 22, 2014
OftqA1 of 4
Page 60 of 210
B. "Shopping cart" means a basket which is mounted on wheels or a similar
device generally used in a retail or commercial establishment by a customer for the
purpose of transporting goods of any kind.
C. "Director" means the diFeGtOF of planniRg and develepm community
development & public works director for the city of Auburn, or such other director or
officer designated by the mayor to administer this chapter.
D. "Owner" means any person or entity, who /which in connection with the
conduct of a business, owns, leases, possesses, or makes a shopping cart available to
customers or the public. For purposes of this chapter, `owner' shall also include the
owner's designated agent.
E. "Premises" means the entire area owned, occupied, and/or utilized by an
owner which provides shopping carts for use by customers or other persons, including
any parking lot or other property provided by or on behalf of the owner for customer
parking or use. (Ord. 6287 § 2, 2010; Ord. 5906 § 1, 2005.)
8.18.020 Findings — Purpose.
A. Public Nuisance. Abandoned shopping carts constitute a public nuisance,
create potential hazards to the health and safety of the public, and interfere with
pedestrian and vehicular traffic in the city. The accumulation of wrecked and dismantled
abandoned shopping carts on public property tends to create conditions that reduce
property values, and promotes blight and deterioration.
B. Intention. The intent of this chapter is to ensure that measures -are taken
to facilitate the retrieval of abandoned shopping carts in a manner consistent with state
law.
C. Applicability. This chapter shall apply to all, owners of any business
establishments or other commercial services within the city of Auburn that provide
shopping carts for customer use or the public. (Ord. 5906 § 1, 2005.)
8.18.030 Regulations.
A. Abandonment Prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to cause or
permit any shopping cart to be abandoned upon any sidewalk, street or other public
area, other than the premises of the owner of such shopping cart.
B. Cart Identification Required.
1. Every shopping cart owned or provided by any owner must have a sign
permanently affixed to the shopping cart that contains all of the following information:
a. Identity of owner, business establishment, or both.
b. Notification to the public that the removal of the shopping cart from the
premises is a violation of state law, and notification to the public of the procedure to be
utilized for authorized removal of the cart from the premises.
C. The address or phone number of the owner of the business establishment
for shopping cart return.
2. Any shopping cart found abandoned on public property that does not
have the identification and information required by subsection B of this section, or does
not have other ownership information or identification that is sufficient, in the city's
determination, to allow the city to mail to the owner an invoice /notice of impoundment by
certified mail, return receipt requested, may be removed from such public property and
disposed of by the city in accordance with state law for disposition of abandoned
property. The determination of whether there is sufficient inform_ ation of ownership,
where the identification requirements of subsection B of this section are not met, shall be
in the sole discretion of the director. (Ord. 6046 § 1, 2006; Ord. 5906 § 1, 2005.)
Ordinance No. 6530
August 22, 2014
OK" of 4
Page 61 of 210
8.18.040 Nuisance — Enforcement.
Abandoned shopping carts are declared to be a public nuisance. The city's
enforcement rights for abandoned shopping carts are nonexclusive, and include the
enforcement methods provided in this chapter and in this title of the city code, as Well as
any other methods for abatement of nuisances, and any other enforcement methods
available under the law or in equity, including the following:
A. Civil Enforcement. Any owner who violates any provision of this chapter
shall be subject to enforcement procedures for each violation in accordance with
Chapter 1.25 ACC.
B. Impoundment, Retrieval and Notification.
1, As an alternative to civil enforcement or other methods of enforcement,
the director may impound any abandoned shopping carts left on any public property
owned by or under the control of the city, or left on any public right -of -way within the city.
The director may hold _''r " pemod- impounded shopping carts shall be- held-at the city's
maintenance and operations yard whpFe they shall rernain.until retrieved by the owner or
disposed of by the city as herein provided.
2. Whenever the director has impounded any abandoned shopping carts
bearing the identification of ownership as required by ACC 8_.18.030(8), or such other
ownership information or identification that is sufficient, in the city's determination, to
allow the city to mail to the owner an invoice/notice of impoundment by certified mail,
return receipt requested, the director or designee shall mail an invoice/notice of
impoundment by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the owner at the address
shown on the shopping cart's identification label, or such address as is determined by
the director to be appropriate to give reasonable notice to the owner where the
identification requirements of ACC 8.18.030(13) are not met. Such invoice/notice shall
advise that the impounded shopping carts may be redeemed at the city's maintenance
and operations yard during the normal work day (between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays) upon payment of the administrative
impoundment fee of $30.00 per shopping cart. The invoice/notice shall also advise the
owner that if the impounded abandoned oned shopping carts are not retrieved within 14 days
of the date of the invoicelnotice, the abandoned shopping carts shall be subject to
disposal by the city, and in addition to the $30.00 administrative impoundment fee the
owner shall also be obligated to pay an additional $70.00 disposal fee, per shopping
cart.
3. If the impounded abandoned shopping carts are not retrieved within 14
days of the date of the invoicelnotice, the director shall be authorized to dispose of the
abandoned shopping carts through whatever means or manner the director deems
reasonable and appropriate. In the event of such disposal, the director is authorized to
take appropriate steps to collect the $30.00 administrative impoundment fee, as well as
the additional $70.00 disposal fee, per shopping cart. The shopping cart disposal fee
shall be in addition to the administrative impoundment fee, and the administrative
impoundment fee shall be due and owing regardless of whether or not the shopping
carts are retrieved.
4. If an abandoned shopping cart is impounded that does not have the
ownership identification information permanently affixed to it as required by ACC
8.18.030(8), or does not have other ownership information or identification that is
sufficient, in the city's determination, to allow the city to mail to the owner an
invoice/notice of impoundment by certified mail, return receipt requested, the director
Ordinance No. 5530
August 22, 2014
O "e .A3 of 4
Page 62 of 210
shall be authorized to dispose of it immediately, without any notice requirements. (Ord.
6046 § 2, 2006; Ord. 5906 § 1, 2005.)
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be
separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision,
section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any
person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or
the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five
days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPRO ED AS TO FORM:
D ieI B. Hei , City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
Ordinance No. 6530
August 22, 2014
Of�pgA4 of 4
Page 63 of 210
C i..i,y C�1:
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N'
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6535
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 30, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Community Development Ordinance No. 6535 $0
& Public Works
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6535.
Background Summary:
The Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan ( CDPMP), which was
adopted by Resolution 5031 in January 2014, guides parking policy development and
implementation within downtown Auburn. The CDPMP includes an action plan that
specifies near -term (0 -1 year), short -term (1 -5 year), and long -term (5 -10 year)
recommendations. Implementation of 3 -hour timed parking throughout the Downtown
Urban Center (DUC) zone and implementation of transparent parking policies (code)
that reflect parking restrictions as- signed and administrative authority for adjusting
parking restrictions are identified as near -term recommendations of the CDPMP.
In order to effectively implement the above - referenced near -term recommendations,
staff proposes changes to ACC 10.36 Stopping, Standing, and Parking, for which the
Phase 1 update is generally as follows:
Removing ACC 10.36.370, 10.36.380, 10.36.390, 10.36.395, 10.36.490,
10.36.500, and 10.36.515, which respectively designate 15- minute, 1 -hour,
2 -hour, 3 -hour, commercial loading zones, passenger loading zones, and
school bus loading zones at specific locations of City right -of -way (ROW).
The removal of these ACC 10.36 sections is necessary to eliminate conflict
between the implementation (signing) of 3 -hour timed parking throughout the
DUC, with the exception of existing signed loading zone and ADA parking
spaces, and the specification of various timed and loading zone parking in the
DUC by these ACC 10.36 sections. In lieu of the removed ACC sections, ACC
10.36.270(A) continues to provide enforcement authority for all signed on- street
parking restrictions.
ORD.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 64 of 210
In addition, the removal will allow City staff to maintain a database of restricted
on- street parking that can be updated as streets are signed or resigned to meet
parking needs, rather than modifying ACC 10.36 whenever on- street parking
restrictions are updated.
• Modifying ACC 10.36.060 to clarify that City staff can establish parking
restrictions on public ROW and municipal parking lots as needed.
ACC 10.36 currently contains conflicting code sections that alternate between
authorizing the City Engineer to sign on- street parking restrictions and requiring
City Council authorization to modify on- street parking restrictions.
City staff have also identified the need to modify other sections pertaining to ACC
10.36, but outside of the CDPMP's scope. Those subsequent modifications will be
presented as part of a Phase 2 update to ACC 10.36.
Staff discussed the Phase 1 update of ACC 10.36 with the Public Works Committee at
its September 15, 2014 regular meeting. The Committee expressed support for the
proposed Phase 1 update of ACC 10.36. At the September 22, 2014 Planning and
Community Development (PCDC) meeting, the Committee expressed support for the
proposed amendments. Public Works Committee recommended approval of
Ordinance No. 6535 at their October 6, 2014 meeting.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Legal, Planning,
Engineer, and Police
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: ORD.B
ORD.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 65 of 210
ORDINANCE NO.6 5 3 5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING CHAPTER
10.36.060 AND 10.36.270 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE
AND REPEALING SECTIONS 10.36.370, 10.36.380,
10.36.390, 10.36.395, 10.36.490, 10.36.500, 10.36.515, OF
THE CITY CODE RELATED TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn regulates timed parking within certain areas of the
City, particularly Downtown Auburn; and
WHEREAS, parking restrictions are outlined in Chapter 10.36 of the Auburn City
Code;-and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5031 adopting the
Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan (CDPMP) for parking policy
development and implementation in Downtown Auburn; and
WHEREAS, within the CDPMP several short term, mid term, and long term
parking management strategies were identified and the first strategy being addressed is
modifying Auburn City Code Chapter 10.36 to allow administratively changes to timed
parking within Downtown Auburn, and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Committee of City Council reviewed the proposed
amendments to Auburn City Code Chapter 10.36 at their September 15, 2014 meeting;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee of City
Council reviewed the proposed amendments to Auburn City Code Chapter 10.36 at
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 1 of 12
ORD.B Page 66 of 210
their September 22, 2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, the Public Works Committee of City Council made a
recommendation to the full Auburn City Council at their October 6, 2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of staff, City Council determines that
amending certain sections of Chapter 10.36 of the Auburn City Code 10.36 will facilitate
the implementation of the CDPMP and is therefore in the best interest of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows.
Section 1. Amendment to City Code. That Section 10.36.060 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
10.36.060 Additoonal r6gulafiens pretnulgation autherity. Authority to designate
parking restrictions.
this Gha.,+ The mayor or the mayor's designee has the authoritV to establish parkim
restrictions on public streets and in municipal parking lots. Such restrictions include,
without limitation Loading Zones One -HoL r Parkin Two -Hour Parkin Three -Hour
Parking, No Parking Anytime, Disabled Parking, restricted parking by vehicle type,
weight, or length, and - similar. designations. No such parking restrictions shall apply to
law enforcement or other emergency and City .vehicles when in service. (Ord. 5212 § 1
(Exh. F), 1999; 1957 code § 9.22.120.)
Section 2. Amendment to City Code. That Section 10.36.270 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is amended to read as follows:
10.36.270 Prohibited parking places.
A. Except when necessary to avoid conflict with other traffic or to comply with
other provisions of this code or with the direction of a police officer or traffic- control sign
or signal, it is unlawful for the operator of a vehicle to stop, stand, park or angle park
such vehicle in or on any of the following places:
1.. Within an intersection area;
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 2 of 12
ORD.B Page 67 of 210
2. Within 20 feet of an uncontrolled intersection;
3. Within 30 feet of an intersection controlled by a stop sign, yield sign, or traffic -
control signal;
4.. On a crosswalk or within 20 feet of a crosswalk, whether marked or unmarked;
5. In front of or within 50 feet of the driveway entrance to any fire or police station
or w_ ithin any marked area contiguous to such driveway, when properly signed;
6. In front of or within a fire or emergency service access or an area signed for
other safety access purposes;
7. In front of or within 15 feet of a fire hydrant;
8. Within any space marked as a fire lane;
9. In front of a public or private driveway, or within five feet of the end of the curb
radius leading thereto;
10. On a sidewalk, pedestrian path, or landscape strip. However, parking shall be
permitted on landscape strips subject to the maintenance requirements contained in
ACC 10.36.215, and where the landscape strip is eight feet or greater in width between
the curb and the sidewalk or the edge of right -of -way if there is no sidewalk, the
adjacent curb is mountable, and the park_ ed vehicle does not obstruct the use of the
traveled way or sidewalk;
11. Alongside or opposite any street excavation or obstruction when such
stopping, parking or angle parking would obstruct traffic;
12.. In any alley, except that trucks or delivery vehicles may park or angle park in
alleys for such time, not in excess of 30 minutes, as may be necessary for the
expeditious loading or unloading of such vehicles or the delivery or pickup of articles or
materials, unless otherwise restricted by this chapter;
13. Upon any bridge, overpass, underpass, trestle, or approaches thereto;
14. On that portion of any street contiguous to and opposite any outside court,
corridor, passage, fire escape, exit or entrance door or any other place adjacent to, or
any door opening in any outer wall of any building containing, in whole or in part, any
theater, public auditorium, church, dance hall or other place of public assembly through
Which the public must pass to leave such building, while such building is being utilized
for public gatherings; and it shall be incumbent upon and the duty of the owner or agent
of the property used for the purpose herein specified to designate such prohibited areas
by the placement of stanchions or signs or curb markings of the form and type
satisfactory to the city engineer;
15. On the roadway side of any vehicle stopped or parked at the edge or curb of
a street;
16. At any place where official traffic signs have been erected at the direction of
the city engineer prohibiting parking and/or angle parking, either at all times or at such
times as are indicated upon signage giving notice thereof;
17. Outside of the limits of the individual parking spaces (stalls) designated for
vehicular on- street parking;
18. Within 30 feet of the nearest rail of a railroad crossing;
19. At any place where all official signs prohibit stopping;
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 3 of 12
ORD.B Page 68 of 210
20. Within traffic lanes that are less than 18 feet wide on arterial and collector
roadways, as designated in the comprehensive transportation plan, except when
authorized by sign;
21. Within median lanes in the traveled way;
22. Within roadway shoulders that are less than eight feet wide;
23. Within marked bicycle lanes;
24. Upon any street or public way for the principal purposes of displaying the
vehicles for sale or for advertising services for vehicles;
25. Upon any street or public way for the purpose of doing any work on,
maintaining or repairing any vehicle except for repairs necessitated by an emergency;
26. Within any street -side drainage ditch or drainage Swale;
27. Where prohibited by signage; or
28. Adjacent to a traffic island.
B. No person shall move a vehicle not owned by him into any such prohibited
area or away from a curb such distance as is unlawful.
C. If any person wishes a different parking restriction sign placement or a
different time parameter for any parking restrictions under this section, said person may
forward such request to the city engineer, the °in work
,
,
and then the fUll G.ty „O„nG,l. For review, the city engineer shall consult with community
development and police.
D. Violation - Penalty. Any person who violates this section has committed an
infraction and, except for those subsections set forth in Table 270-1, shall pay a fine of
$30.00 within 15 days from the date of issuance of a notice of violation or of $40.00 if
paid after the fifteenth day from issuance of the notice.
Any person who violates any of the subsections listed in Table 270 -1 shall pay a
fine as set forth in that table.
Table 270 -1
Subsection
if paid within
if paid after
15 days
15th day
10.36.270(A)(1)
$40.00
$50.00
10.36.270(A)(2)
$40.00
$50.00
10.36?- 270(A)(3)
$40.00
$50.00
10.36 -.270(A)(7)
$50.00
$60.00
10.36.270(A)(8)
$50.00
$60.00
10 :36.170(A)(10)
$40.00
$50.00
10.36.270(A)(16)
$50.00
$60.00
10.36.270(A)(17)
$50.00
$60.00
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 4 of 12
ORD.B Page 69 of 210
(Ord. 6275 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6247 § 9, 2009; Ord. 6211 § 6, 2008; Ord. 6129 § 4, 2007;
Ord. 6082 § 1, 2007; Ord. 5684 § 1, 2002; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Exh. F), 1999; 1957 code §
9.22.140.)
Section 3. Repeal of City Code Section. That Section 10.36.370 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 4. Repeal of City Code Section. That Section 10.36.380 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 5. Repeal of City Code-Section. That 10.36.390 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 6. Repeal of City Code Section. That Section 10.36.395 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 7. Repeal of City Code.Section. That Section 10.36.490 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 8. Repeal of City Code Section_ That Section 10.36.500 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 9. Repeal of City Code Section. That Section 10.36.515 of the
Auburn City Code be and the same hereby is repealed.
Section 10. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement
such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
legislation.
Section 11. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared
to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph,
subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application
thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of
this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 5 of 12
ORD.B Page 70 of 210
Section 12: Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force
five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law.
INTRODUCED.-
PASSED:
APPROVED:
CITY OF AUBURN
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FOR
Dani . Hei , C ity _ orney
Published:
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2.014
Page 6 of 12
ORD.B Page 71 of 210
TEXT OF REPEALED CODE SECTIONS
10.36.370 Fifteen - minute parking zones.
The owner or operator of a vehicle shall not stop or park such vehicle for a longer
continuous time than 15 minutes of any day upon the following named streets and
avenues in the city:
"A" Street Northwest, west side, from the south curbline of 1 st Street Northwest,
south to the alley between West Main and 1st Street Northwest.
West Main Street, north side, beginning at a point 35 feet east of the east
curbline of "A" Street Northeast thence easterly 50 feet. (Ord. 5758 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5720
§ 1, 2002; Ord. 5559 § 1, 2001; Ord. 5485 § 1, 2000; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Exh. F), 1999; Ord.
4021 § 1, 1984; Ord. 3736 § 5, 1982; Ord. 3352 §§ 1, 2, 3, 1979; Ord. 2993 § 2, 1976;
1957 code § 9.22.180.)
1036.380 One -hour parking zones.
A one -hour parking limit without meters is established on the following streets,
which one -hour parking limit shall exist from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily, excluding
Sundays and holidays:
1 st Street Northeast, north side, between Auburn Way North and a point 106 feet
west.
1st Street Northeast, south side, between "B" Street Northeast and Auburn Way
North.
1 st Street Northeast, south side, from a point 118 feet east of the east curbline of
North Division Street to the west curbline of Auburn Avenue.
1st Street Northwest, north side, from the east curbline of "B" Street Northwest to
the first alley east of "A" Street Northwest.
1st Street Northwest, south side, between the west curbline of "A" Street
Northwest and the east curbline of "B" Street Northwest.
7th Street Northeast, south side, from the east curbline of "B" Street Northeast to
a point 1.20 feet east.
"A" Street Northwest, west side, from the first intersecting alley north of West
Main Street to the north curbline of West Main Street.
"A" Street Southeast, west side, between the south curbline of East Main Street
to the north curbline of 2nd Street Southeast.
"A" Street Southwest, both sides, between the south curbline of West Main Street
to the first intersecting alley south of 1 st Street Southwest.
"B" Street Northeast, east side, only between Main Street and 1st Street
Northeast.
Auburn Avenue, east side, immediately north of the east -west crosswalk located
on the north.side of East Main Street, one parking stall only.
Auburn Way North, east side, between Main Street and 1 st Street Northeast.
Auburn Way South, east side, from the south curbline of East Main Street, south
to the north curbline of 4th Street Southeast.
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 7 of 12
ORD.B Page 72 of 210
Auburn Way South, west side, from the south curbline of East Main Street,
thence southerly a distance of 140 feet. (Ord. 6136 § 1, 2008; Ord. 5752 § 1, 2003; Ord.
5660 § 1, 2002; Ord. 5559 § 1, 2001 Ord. 5485 § 1, 2000; Ord. 5228 § 1, 1999; Ord.
5212 § 1 (Exh. F), 1999; Ord. 5017 § 2, 1997; Ord. 4977 § 1, 1997; Ord. 4858 § 1,
1996; Ord. 4603 § 1, 1993; Ord. 4497 § 2, 1991; Ord. 4236 § 2, 1987; Ord. 4004 §§ 1,
2, 1984; Ord. 3984 §§ 1, 3, 1984; Ord. 3736 §§ 6, 7, 1982, Ord. 3508 § 3, 1980; Ord.
3352 §§ 4, 5, 1979; Ord. 3329 § 2-, 1978; Ord. 3327 § 3, 1978; Ord. 3205 § 1, 1977;
Ord. 3149 § 4, 1976; Ord. 2999 § 2, 1976; 1957 code § 9.22.190.)
10.36.390 Two -hour parking-zones.
A two -hour parking limit without meters is established on the following streets,
which two -hour parking limit shall exist from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. daily, excluding
Sundays and holidays unless otherwise noted below.
1 st Street Northeast, south side, between Auburn Way North and a point 143 feet
east.
1st Street Northwest, north side, beginning 36 feet east of the first intersecting
alley west of Nort h Division Street, thence west to "A" Street Northwest.
1st Street Northwest, south side, from the east curbline of "A" Street Northwest,
easterly to the west curbline of North Division Street.
1 st Street Southeast and Southwest; both sides, between "A" Street Southeast
and "A" Street Southwest.
2nd Street Northeast, both sides, between North Division Street and Auburn Way
North.
2nd Street Southeast, north side, between "B" Street Southeast and a point 80
feet west.
2nd Street Southeast, north side, between Auburn Way South and "D" Street
Southeast.
2nd Street Southeast, south side, between "A" Street Southeast and "B" Street
Southeast.
2nd Street Southeast, north side, between "B" Street Southeast and Auburn Way
South.
3rd Street Northeast, south side, between Auburn Avenue and Auburn Way
North.
3rd Street Northeast, north side, between Auburn Avenue and a point 13 feet
west of Auburn Way North.
4th Street Northeast, south side, beginning at the west curbline of "J" Street
Northeast, thence west 200 feet. Effective Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:00
p.m.
4th Street Northeast, south side, beginning at the east curbline of "E" Street
Northeast, thence east 325 feet. Effective Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:00
p.m.
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 8 of 12
ORD.B Page 73 of 210
4th Street Northeast, north side, beginning at the east curbline of "E" Street
Northeast, thence east 650 feet. Effective Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 3:00
p.m.
4th Street Southeast, south side, beginning at a point 32 feet east of the east
marginal line of Auburn Way South, thence east 70 feet..
6th Street Northeast, north side, from the east curbline of Auburn Way North,
easterly a distance of 204 feet.
6th Street Southeast, both sides, from the west curbline of Auburn Way South to
the east curbline of "A" Street Southeast.
"A" Street Southwest, east side, beginning at a point 430 feet south of the
southeast curbline of 2nd Street Southwest, thence south 145 feet.
"B" Street Northwest, east side, between West Main Street and 1st Street
Northwest.
"D" Street Northeast, both sides, between East Main Street and 1st Street
Northeast_.
"D" Street Southeast, west side, beginning at a point 180 feet south of the south
curbline of East Main Street.
"E' Street Northeast, west side, between East Main Street and 1st Street
Northeast.
"H" Street Northeast, east side, between 4th Street Northeast and a point 100
feet north.
"I" Street Northeast, both sides, beginning at the north curbline of East Main
Street and continuing north to its terminus.
Auburn Avenue, east side, between a point 120 feet south of 2nd Street
Northeast to a point 50 feet south of the south curbline of 3rd Street Northeast.
Auburn Way North, east side, from 1st Street Northeast to 2nd Street Northeast.
East Main Street, south side, between Auburn Way South and "M" Street
Southeast.
East Main Street, north side, from "G" Street Northeast to "M" Street Northeast.
East Main and West Main Streets, both sides, between "A" Street Northwest and
Southwest and Auburn Way North and South. Except for two 15- minute parking stalls
located on the north side of West Main Street, beginning at a point 35 feet east of the
east curbline of "A" Street thence easterly 50 feet.
North Division and South Division Streets, east side, between 2nd Street
Northeast and 1st Street Southeast.
North Division Street, west side, from the north curbline of West Main Street to a
point 95 feet north of the north curbline of West Main Street.
South Division Street., west side only, between 2nd Street Southwest and 2nd
Street Southeast to the east -west alley parallel to and between 2nd Street Northwest
and 3rd Street Southwest.
South Division Street, west side, beginning at the south curbline of West Main
Street continuing south to the north curbline of 1st Street Southwest.
Ordinance No. 5535
September 30, 2014
Page 9 of 12
ORD.B Page 74 of 210
West Main Street, south side, from the east curb -line of "B" Street Southwest to
the West curbline of "A" Street Southwest. (Ord. 6208 § 1, 2008; Ord. 6136 § 2, 2008; -
Ord. 6173 § 1, 2008; Ord. 6113 § 1, 2007; Ord. 5720 § 1, 2002; Ord. 5559 § 1, 2001;
Ord. 5246 § 1 (Exh. C), 1999; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Exh. F), 1999; Ord. 4977 § 1, 1997; Ord..
4858 § 1, 1996; Ord. 4603 § 1, 1993; Ord. 4013 §§ 4, 5, 1984; Ord. 3467 §§ 1, 2, 1979;
Ord. 3359 § 2, 1979; Ord. 3332 §§ 7, 8, 1979; Ord. 3327 § 2, 1978; Orel. 3205 § 2 -,
1977; Ord. 3184 § 1, 1977; Ord. 3149 § 3, 1976; Ord. 3139 §§ 1, 2, 1976; Ord. 2998 §
2, 1976; 1957 code § 9.22.200.)
10.36.395 Three -hour parking zones.
A three -hour parking limit Without meters is established on the following streets,
Which three -hour parking limit shall exist from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. daily, excluding
Sundays and holidays..
"A" Street Northwest, north of Main. and south of 3rd Northwest, both sides of the
roadway, except "A" Street Nort hwest, east side; from the north curbline of West Main
Street to the south curbline of 1 st Street Northwest (no parking zone).
North Division Street, north of 2nd Street and south of 3rd Northwest, both sides
of the roadway.
2nd Street Northwest between Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks and Division
Street, both sides of the roadway.
"A" Street Northeast from 2nd Street Northeast to 7th Street Northeast, both
sides of the roadway.
North Division Street north of 5th Street Northeast to the dead -end, both sides of
the roadway.
5th, Street Northeast from Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks to Auburn
Avenue, both sides of the roadway.
"B" Street Northeast from 3rd Street Northeast to 7th Street Northeast, both sides
of the roadway. (Ord. 5724 § 12, 2002.)
10.36.490 Commercial loading zones designated.
The following are commercial loading zones:
A. 2nd Street Southeast, south side, from a point 68 feet east of the east
marginal line of South Division Street, a distance of 45 feet east.
B. Reserved.
C. "B" Street Southwest, east- side, immediately south of West Main Street,
beginning at a point 20 feet south of the south marginal Dine of West Main Street, thence
southerly a distance of 40 feet.
D. Reserved.
E. North Division Street, east side, beginning approximately 25 feet north of the
north curbline of East Main Street and continuing north 40 feet; provided, however, this
commercial loading zone designation shall be in force only from 12:00 noon to 4:00 p.m.
F. "E" Street Northeast beginning at a point 40 feet north of the north curbline of
East Main Street extending north 220 feet.
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 10 of 12
ORD.B Page 75 of 210
G. Auburn Way South, east side, from a point 80 feet south of the south curbline
of East Main Street, a southerly distance of 20 feet.
H. Auburn Way North, east side, beginning 83 feet north of the northerly curbline
of East Main Street northerly for 20 feet, to a point eight feet south of entrance to alley.
I. 25th Street Southeast, south side, beginning 190 feet east of the east curbline
of "D" Street Southeast, thence east a distance of 60 feet.
J. "A" Street Northeast, east side, beginning 120 feet south of the south curbline
of 3rd Street Northeast, thence south a distance of 60 feet.
K. The city engineer shall have the authority to establish commercial loading
zones for a period not to exceed 90 days. (Ord. 6154 § 1, 2008; Ord.. 6114 § 1, 2007;
Ord. 5902 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Ex_h. F), 1999; Ord.. 4821 § 2, 1996; Ord. 4616 § 2,
1993; Ord.. 3865 § 1, 1983; Ord. 3190 § 1, 1977; Ord. 3149 § 2, 1976; Ord. 2851 § 2,
1974; Ord. 2850 § 2, 1974; 1957 code § 9.22.260(a).)
10.36.500 Passenger loading zones.
The following are passenger loading zones:
A. 4th Street Northeast, north side, beginning at the west curbline of "H" Street
Northeast, thence west 200 feet.
B. East Main Street, south side, beginning at a point 30 feet east of the east
curbline of "W' Street Southeast, thence east 25 feet.
C. East Main Street, north side, beginning at the east curbline of "G" Street
Southeast east 115 feet.
D. "L" Street Southeast, east side, beginning at the intersection of 7th Street
Southeast and proceeding north 30 feet.
E. "M" Street Southeast, west side, beginning at a point five feet south of the
south curbline of 23rd Street Southeast extended, thence north 84 feet to the beginning,
thence north 65 feet, during the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on regular school days.
F. Beginning 100 feet north of the north curbline of 4th Street Northeast, thence
north 44 feet on the east side of "H" Street Northeast, during the hours from B :00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday.
G. "D" Street Northwest, west side, beginning 237 feet north of the north curbline
of West Main Street and continuing north 120 feet.
H. "A" Street Northwest, west side, beginning at a point 56 feet north of the north
curbline of West Main Street, thence north 43 feet.
I. 14th Street Northeast, north side, beginning at a point 65 feet west of the west
curbline of "Kn Street Northeast, thence westerly 145 feet.
J. 17th Street Southeast, south side, beginning at a point 570 feet east of the
east curbline of "C" Street Southeast, thence east a distance of 80 feet.
K. Auburn Avenue, east side, beginning at a point 20 feet south of the south
curbline of 3rd Street Northeast to a point 50 feet south of the south curbline of 3rd
Street Northeast.
Ordinance No. 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 11 of 12
ORD.B Page 76 of 210
L. Beginning 142 feet south of the southern curbline of East Main Street, thence
south 50 feet on the east side of "N" Street Southeast, during the hours from 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Sunday.
M. West Main Street, north side, beginning 75 feet west of the westerly curbline
of "A" Street Northwest, thence continuing westerly for a distance of 30 feet.
N. West Main Street, north side, beginning 42 feet west of the easterly curbline of
"F" Street Southwest westerly for 20 feet to a point 20 feet east of he
of alley.
0. South Division Street, west side, beginning 20 feet south of the south curbline
of 3rd Street Southwest and continuing south 130 feet.
P. Auburn Avenue, east side, beginning 75 feet north of the north curbline of 2nd
Street Northeast, thence north a distance of 50 feet.
Q. South Division Street, west side, beginning 60 feet south of the south curbline
of 3rd Street Southwest, thence south 40 feet.
R. 'The city engineer shall have the authority to establish passenger loading
zones for a period not to exceed 90 days. (Ord. 6136 § 3, 2008; Ord. 6114 § 1, 2007;
Ord. 5274 § 1, 1999; Ord. 5246 § 1 (Exh. D), 1999; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Exh. F), 1999; Ord.
4821 § 2, 1996; Ord. 4617 § 2, 1993; Ord. 4431 § 2, 1990; Ord. 4096 § 2, 1985; Ord.
4086 § 1, 1985; Ord. 4000 § 1, 1984; Ord. 3984 §§ 2, 4, 1984; Ord: 3849 § 1, 1983;
Ord. 3840 § 1, 1983; Ord. 3428 §§ 1, 2., 1979; Ord. 3181 § 1, 1977; Ord. 3168 § 1,
1977; Ord. 31.10 § 1, 1976; Ord. 3025 § 1, 1975; 1957 code § 9.22.260(b).)
10.36.515 School bus loading zones.
The following are school bus loading zones:
10th Street Southeast, south side, beginning 110 feet west of the west curbline of
"C" Street Southeast, thence east to the west curbline of "D" Street Southeast, school
days only, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
4th Street Northeast, south side, beginning at a point 200 feet west of "J" Street
Northeast, thence west 800 feet. Effective school days only from 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
"D" Street Southeast, westerly side, for 20 feet beginning 125 feet north of 2nd
Street Southeast. Effective school days only from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 a.m. and from 3:15
p.m.. to 4:15 p.m. (Ord. 6208 § 2, 2008; Ord. 6136 § 4, 2008; Ord. 5212 § 1 (Exh. F),
1999; Ord. 4482 § 2, 1991; Ord. 3984 § 5, 1984; Ord. 3835 § 1, 1982; Ord. 3805 § 2,
1982; Ord. 3327 § 4, 1978; Ord. 3166 § 1, 1977.)
Ordinance No, 6535
September 30, 2014
Page 12 of 12
ORD.B Page 77 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N'
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject: Date:
Resolution No. 5097 September 8, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Administration Resdution No. 5097 $0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5097.
Background Summary:
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) makes available Emergency
Management Performance Grants (EMPG) to local jurisdictions specifically to
enhance their emergency management programs. The City of Auburn was allocated
funds based on a state -wide formula. These funds can be used exclusively for
emergency management activities and only for items and activities which were not
previously budgeted for. Funds will be used to conduct planning activities and provide
public education activities and supplies.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Municipal Services
Councilmember: Peloza Staff: Hursh
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: RES.A
RES.A AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 78 of 210
RESOLUTION NO. 5 0 9 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, FORMALLY ACCEPTING A GRANT
FROM THE WASHINGTON STATE MILITARY DEPARTMENT IN
THE AMOUNT OF FIFTY FIVE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED
TWENTY FOUR DOLLARS ($55,724.00) FROM THE UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT
PROGRAM, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
THE NECESSARY AGREEMENTS TO ACCEPT SAID FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City created and maintains an active Emergency
Management Program; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Homeland Security makes
available Emergency Management Performance Grant monies to local
emergency management programs; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Military Department, Emergency
Management Division has approved a grant of those monies to the City of
Auburn Emergency Management program.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1, Purpose. The City Council of the City of Auburn does
hereby accept the Washington State Military Department, Emergency
Management Division offer of a grant in the amount of Fifty Five Thousand
Seven Hundred Twenty Four Dollars ($55,724.00) as the City's allotment of
annual Emergency Management Performance Grant monies.
Resolution No. 5097
September 3, 2014
RES Xage 1 of 1
Page 79 of 210
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby
authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary
to carry out the directions of this resolution.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect and be in
full force upon passage and signatures hereon.
DATED AND SIGNED THIS DAY OF OCTOBER 2014.
CITY OF AUBURN
Nancy Backus
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle Daskam,
City Clerk
APP?OVED �k§ TO FOR
Daniel. B. Rei"�
City ff.
Attorney
Resolution No. 5097
September 3, 2014
RES. ,kage 2 of 2
Page 80 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N'
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5102.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5102 authorizes the Mayor to enter into a Wholesale Water Supply
Agreement with the City of Tacoma, Department of Public Works, Water Division
(Tacoma).
In 2012 the City signed an agreement with Tacoma for wholesale water supply for up
to 1.0 million gallons per day (MGD) average annual daily water use. Currently the
City is taking this quantity of water from the B Street NW Intertie.
In 2013 the City signed an agreement with Cascade Water Alliance (Cascade) to
purchase an additional 2.5 MGD of Tacoma water. This would be accomplished by
paying to Cascade the system development charges that Cascade previously paid to
Tacoma. Tacoma approved the agreement between Auburn and Cascade.
The proposed agreement amends, restates, and supersedes the 2012 Wholesale
Water Supply Agreement between Auburn and Tacoma, and provides for a total of 3.5
MGD (annual average daily demand) of wholesale water supply and the associated
peak amounts from the other agreements.
Following execution of this new agreement, the City intends to negotiate a wholesale
market rate price for water for up to a 20 year period with Tacoma. The new rate will
be presented at a later meeting as an addendum to this new agreement.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Finance, Public Works
Councilmember: Osborne Staff: Snyder
RES.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 81 of 210
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: RES.B
RES.B AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 82 of 210
RESOLUTION NO. 51 0 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE A WHOLESALE WATER AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF AUBURN AND THE CITY OF
TACOMA
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn is obligated to provide an adequate water supply
to meet customer demand; and
WHEREAS, the City has adopted a combined water supply strategy that includes
improving City sources to fully utilize its water rights and purchasing water from
adjacent purveyors; and
WHEREAS, on June 4, 2012, the City of Auburn City Council adopted Resolution
No. 4822 authorizing the Mayor to execute a Wholesale Water Agreement with the City
of Tacoma, which agreement allowed the City to purchase water in keeping with the
City's supply strategy; and
WHEREAS, in July 2012, the City of Auburn entered into the Wholesale Water
Agreement with the City of Tacoma, Department of Public Works, Water Division
(Tacoma) to purchase 1.0 million gallons per day (MGD) (annual average daily use)
water at a wholesale rate; and
WHEREAS, in September 2013, the City of Auburn entered into the Agreement
for the Purchase and Sale of Credits Relating to Permanent Wholesale Water Supply
Capacity with Cascade Water Alliance (Cascade) for 2.5 MGD (annual average daily
use) of Tacoma water; and
Resolution No. 5102
September 25, 2014
4NeB1 of 2
Page 83 of 210
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a Wholesale Agreement with the City of
Tacoma to utilize the 2.5 MGD water purchased from Cascade along with the existing
1.0 MGD, for a total of 3.5 MGD annual average daily use.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Wholesale Water
Agreement between the City of Auburn and the City of Tacoma, which agreement shall
be in substantial conformity with agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Dated and signed this day of , 2014.
CITY OF AUBURN
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
qA :1:Z@ IXI reM C9
Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney
Resolution No. 5102
September 25, 2014
Rtg.q? of 2
Page 84 of 210
Exhibit A
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
This WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), by and
between the City of Tacoma, Department of Public Utilities, Water Division ( "Tacoma "), and
the City of Auburn ( "City "), is made and entered into as of this day of
(2014) ( "Effective Date "). Tacoma and City are sometimes referred to collectively as the
"Parties" and individually as a "Party." This Agreement is made with reference to the
following facts:
RECITALS
WHEREAS, Tacoma is a municipality organized and operating under the laws of the
State of Washington and operates a water utility pursuant to RCW 35.92.010;
WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35.92.170 -.200, Tacoma is authorized to operate a
water utility outside its geographical boundaries and to sell surplus water to customers outside
of Tacoma's city limits;
WHEREAS, City is a noncharter code city organized and operating as a municipal
corporation under the laws of the State of Washington;
WHEREAS, City and Tacoma have previously entered into a "Wholesale Water
Agreement" dated July 6, 2012, pursuant to which Tacoma is required to provide, upon City's
request, a wholesale water supply of up to 1 MGD (annual average daily use, subject to
certain 2.0 MGD peak day and 1.8 MGD peak period limitations set forth therein), for use by
City in connection with the prudent use and management of its water system (the "Existing
Agreement");
WHEREAS, Tacoma and Cascade Water Alliance, a joint municipal utilities services
authority ( "Cascade "), have heretofore entered into an "Amended and Restated Agreement for
the Sale of Wholesale Water" dated December 31, 2012 (the "Cascade /Tacoma Agreement ");
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 6 of the Cascade /Tacoma Agreement, Tacoma has
available surplus water and is willing to sell to City a 2.5 MGD (annual average daily use)
wholesale water supply, which is a portion of the 4 MGD (annual average daily use)
wholesale water supply that is available as of the Effective Date to sell to City pursuant to the
Cascade /Tacoma Agreement;
WHEREAS, the Parties desire, by this Agreement, to amend and restate the Existing
Agreement;
WHEREAS, Tacoma is willing to make a 3.5 MGD (1.0 MGD + 2 5 MGD) (annual
average daily use) wholesale water supply available to City as a direct wholesale customer of
Tacoma in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, which is a
combination of the 1 MGD wholesale water supply currently provided under the Existing
Page i of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi &6 of 210
Agreement and the 2.5 MGD available pursuant to the Cascade /Tacoma Agreement, subject
to certain peak - period limitations set forth below;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of RCW 35.92.010, the Parties specifically
find that this Agreement will at a minimum generate revenues sufficient for Tacoma to cover
the marginal cost of the available surplus water supplied to City; and
WHEREAS, City is willing to purchase and accept delivery of such wholesale water
supply from Tacoma as a direct wholesale customer of Tacoma in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and conditions
herein contained, the Parties agree as follows:
AGREEMENT
1. DEFINITIONS
For purposes of this Agreement, the following terms defined herein shall have the
following meanings, whether singular or plural:
"Applicable Law" means any applicable and binding statute, law, rule, regulation,
code, ordinance, judgment, decree, writ, legal requirement or order, and the written
interpretations thereof, of any national, federal, state or local Governmental Authority having
jurisdiction over the Parties or the performance of this Agreement.
"Cascade" shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Cascade /Tacoma Agreement" shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"City" shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
"City Hazardous Substances" means any Hazardous Substances generated,
transported, kept, handled, stored, placed, discharged or released by City, or by anyone
directly or indirectly retained or employed by City, in connection with the performance of this
Agreement.
"City Isolation Valve" means a positive shut -off valve owned and operated by City as
part of the Interconnection Facilities.
"Dispute" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 17.1.
"Draft Operating Plan" means a non - binding informational plan intended to advise
Tacoma of the amount of the Wholesale Water Supply that City anticipates it will use during
the period starting June 1 and ending September 31 each year during the Term.
"Effective Date" shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
Page 2 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi &Q of 210
"Existing Agreement" shall have the meaning set forth in the Recitals.
"Flow Control Valve" means the valve that controls the volume of water that is
delivered to City and is more particularly described in Exhibit A.
"Governmental Authority" means (a) any federal, national, state, tribal, county,
municipal or local government (whether domestic or foreign), or any political subdivision
thereof, (b) any court or administrative tribunal; (c) any other governmental, quasi -
governmental, judicial, public or statutory instrumentality, authority, body, agency, bureau or
entity of competent jurisdiction; or (d) any nongovernmental agency, tribunal or entity that is
vested by a governmental agency with applicable jurisdiction.
"Hazardous Substances" means any substance or material regulated or governed by
Applicable Law; any substance, emission or material now or hereafter deemed by any
Governmental Authority or Applicable Law to be a "regulated substance," "hazardous
material," "hazardous waste," "hazardous constituent," "hazardous substance," "dangerous
material," "dangerous waste," "dangerous substance," "toxic substance," "radioactive
substance" or a "pesticide "; and any other substance with properties that are harmful or
deleterious to human health or to the environment.
"Interconnection Facilities" means all facilities, other than the Wholesale Service
Connections, that are necessary for City to access and take delivery of the Wholesale Water
Supply at the Wholesale Service Connections and to convey such water to City's transmission
and distribution systems. Interconnection Facilities include the City Isolation Valve and such
other pressure- reducing valves, power service, storm drainage, vaults, telecommunications
service, conduit, controllers, pedestals and boxes operated by City as part of the
Interconnection Facilities. For avoidance of doubt, Interconnection Facilities do not include
the Wholesale Service Connections or any other facilities owned and operated by Tacoma that
are necessary to deliver the Wholesale Water Supply to the Wholesale Service Connections.
"Meter" means the delivery metering equipment determined by Tacoma to be
necessary for the implementation of this Agreement.
"Operating Protocols" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.3.
"Party" or "Parties" shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble of this
Agreement.
"Person" means any individual, corporation, municipal corporation, company,
voluntary association, partnership, incorporated organization, trust or limited liability
company, or any other entity or organization, including any Governmental Authority.
"Project" means that certain water supply project commonly referred to as the Second
Supply Project, which is owned and operated by Tacoma in order to meet Tacoma's future
water supply requirements and to increase regional supply, with the participation of its project
partners the City of Kent, the Covington Water District and the Lakehaven Utility District in
Page 3 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi 027 of 210
accordance with the terms and conditions of the 2002 Second Supply Project Partnership
Agreement.
"Prudent Utility Practices" means, at any particular time, any of the practices,
methods, decisions and acts that (a) in the exercise of a Party's reasonable judgment in light of
the facts known at the time, would have been expected to accomplish the desired result
consistent with Applicable Law, reliability, efficiency, economy, safety and expedition
commonly engaged in or approved by the water supply industry in the United States prior
thereto; and (b) in the case of Tacoma, includes all practices and methods needed to comply
with the Wholesale Water Regulations. It is recognized that the term "Prudent Utility
Practices" is not intended to be limited to the optimum practices, methods or acts to the
exclusion of all others, but rather refers to a spectrum of possible practices, methods or acts
that could have been expected to accomplish the desired result consistent with Applicable
Law, reliability, efficiency, economy, safety and expedition.
"Schedule" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 11.2.
"System Development Charge" means the system development charge imposed upon
wholesale customers by the Wholesale Water Regulations.
"Tacoma" shall have the meaning set forth in the preamble of this Agreement.
"Tacoma Indemnitees" means Tacoma and Tacoma's directors, officers, employees,
agents, servants, elected officials and representatives, and the respective successors and
assigns of each and all of the foregoing.
"Tacoma Isolation Valve" means a positive shut -off valve installed at the Wholesale
Service Connections and that is more particularly described in Exhibit A.
"Telemetry Equipment" means a data - acquisition system owned and operated by
Tacoma that is used to send signals from the Meter in support of operations and all
appurtenances thereto.
"Temporary Wholesale Water Supply" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 19.
"Term" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 21.
"Uncontrollable Force" means any event or circumstance (or combination thereof) and
the continuing effects of any such event or circumstance (whether or not such event or
circumstance was foreseeable or foreseen by the Parties) that delays or prevents performance
by a Party of any of its obligations under this Agreement. An Uncontrollable Force shall
include the following:
(i) flood, earthquake, drought, climate change, storm, fire,
lightning and other natural catastrophes;
Page 4 of 18
R E S. g9 i 4- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi a8 of 210
(ii) acts of public enemies, armed conflicts, acts of foreign
enemies, acts of terrorism (whether domestic or foreign, state - sponsored or
otherwise), war (whether declared or undeclared), blockade, insurrection, riot,
civil disturbance, revolution or sabotage;
(iii) any form of compulsory government acquisition or
condemnation or change in Applicable Law (other than such acquisition,
condemnation or change by City) that affect the performance of the Parties'
obligations under this Agreement;
(iv) accidents or other casualty, damage, loss or delay during
transportation, explosions, fire, epidemics, quarantines or criminal acts that
affect the performance of the Parties' obligations under this Agreement;
(v) labor disturbances, stoppages, strikes, lock -outs or other
industrial actions affecting the Parties or any of their contractors,
subcontractors (of any tier), agents or employees;
(vi) inability, after the use of commercially reasonable efforts, to
obtain any consent or approval from any Governmental Authority (other than
City) that affects the performance of the Parties' obligations under this
Agreement;
(vii) inability, after the use of commercially reasonable efforts, to
obtain any consent or approval from any Person required by a Party in
connection with this Agreement; and
(viii) third -party litigation contesting all or any portion of the right,
title and interest of a Party in any service, property or other item to be
provided to the other Party in connection with this Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the insufficiency of funds, the financial inability to perform or
any changes in such Party's cost of performing its obligations hereunder shall not constitute an
Uncontrollable Force, and neither Party may raise a claim for relief hereunder, in whole or in
part, in connection with such event or circumstance.
"Wholesale Service Connections" means a physical connection(s) between water
mains of the Parties and is the point of delivery of the Wholesale Water Supply. The
Wholesale Service Connections are more particularly described in Exhibit A and include the
Tacoma Isolation Valve and the Flow Control Valve.
"Wholesale Water Regulations" means all applicable terms and conditions of the
Tacoma Municipal Code, including but not limited to Chapters 12.01 and 12.10 thereof, as
such terms and conditions may now exist or may hereafter be changed, deleted,
supplemented, modified or amended. The Wholesale Water Regulations include Tacoma's
"Customer Service Policies" and such other rules, regulations, policies and guidelines as
Page 5 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi &Q of 210
Tacoma shall, from time to time, adopt and apply on a uniform basis to Tacoma's wholesale
customers.
"Wholesale Water Service" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 4.2.
"Wholesale Water Soply" means a quantity of water of up to 3.5 MGD (annual
average daily demand), subject to the following peak -period limitations:
(a) 5.12 MGD during any consecutive twenty -four (24) hour
period, and
(b) 4.92 MGD during any consecutive ninety -six (96) hour period.
2. EXHIBITS TO THIS AGREEMENT
This Agreement includes the Exhibits listed below, and any reference in this
Agreement to an "Exhibit" by letter designation or title shall mean one of the Exhibits
identified below. If there is an express conflict between the provisions contained within the
body of this Agreement and the provisions of any Exhibit hereto, then the body of this
Agreement shall take precedence, except that with respect to technical specifications and
requirements pertaining to the design, engineering, operation or testing of the Wholesale
Service Connections, the conflicting Exhibit shall take precedence.
Exhibit A: Wholesale Service Connections
Exhibit B: Dispute Resolution Procedures
3. AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF EXISTING AGREEMENT
The rights and obligations of the Parties arising under the Existing Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect and unchanged by this Agreement for the period beginning on
July 6, 2012, and ending on the Effective Date. From and after the Effective Date, this
Agreement fully restates, replaces and supersedes the Existing Agreement and shall govern
and control the rights and obligations of the Parties with respect to the subject matter of the
Existing Agreement, as amended and restated in its entirety by this Agreement. Except as
otherwise provided by this Section 3, from and after the Effective date, the Existing
Agreement is null, void and no longer of any force or effect.
4. WHOLESALE WATER SERVICE
4.1 Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, during the Term,
Tacoma agrees to sell and deliver the Wholesale Water Supply to City, and City agrees to
purchase and take delivery of the Wholesale Water Supply from Tacoma. The Wholesale
Water Supply may be resold by City to another water purveyor, subject to the terms and
conditions of this Agreement.
4.2 The Wholesale Water Supply shall be provided to City as wholesale water
service subject to and in compliance with the Wholesale Water Regulations, Applicable Law,
Page 6 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi 6iQ of 210
Prudent Utility Practices and the terms and conditions of this Agreement ( "Wholesale Water
Service "). Except as otherwise provided by this Agreement, City shall be subject to and
governed by the Wholesale Water Regulations. If, however, there is an express conflict or
inconsistency between the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the terms and
conditions of the Wholesale Water Regulations, then the terms and conditions of this
Agreement shall take precedence, govern and control.
4.3 The Wholesale Water Service shall be provided to City with the same degree
of reliability and certainty of supply as water provided by Tacoma to its existing wholesale
customers (including limitations thereof, such as provisions of the Wholesale Water
Regulations pertaining to interruption of service). The Wholesale Water Service provided to
City is not for the purpose of providing fire flows or for fire suppression purposes, and
Tacoma does not warrant that the flow and pressure of the Wholesale Water Service provided
to City will meet Wholesale Water Regulations or Applicable Law related to providing fire
flows or for fire suppression purposes. City acknowledges it is solely responsible for
compliance with Applicable Law related to fire flows and fire suppression. The Parties
acknowledge that Wholesale Water Service is inherently subject to disruption, interruption,
suspension, curtailment and fluctuation. Tacoma shall not have any liability to City or any
other Person for any disruption, interruption, suspension, curtailment or fluctuation in the
Wholesale Water Service.
5. WHOLESALE WATER SERVICE CHARGES AND FEES
City shall pay Tacoma all charges, fees and other amounts for the Wholesale Water
Service as shall be due and payable, from time to time, pursuant to the Wholesale Water
Regulations. All rates, charges, fees and other amounts due Tacoma for the Wholesale Water
Service pursuant to the Wholesale Water Regulations are subject to periodic adjustment by
the Public Utility Board and Tacoma City Council. At any time during the Term, the
applicable rate, charge, fee or other amount due Tacoma from City for the Wholesale Water
Service shall be the rate, charge, fee or amount as shall then be in effect.
6. SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
As of the Effective Date, the System Development Charge due and payable to Tacoma
pursuant to the Existing Agreement has been fully paid by City to Tacoma pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the Existing Agreement. A System Development Charge for a
wholesale water supply of 2.5 MGD has been paid by Cascade to Tacoma pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the Cascade /Tacoma Agreement. The remaining System
Development Charge due Tacoma from City pursuant to the Wholesale Water Regulations
has, as of the Effective Date, been fully paid to Tacoma by or on behalf of City.
7. PAYMENTS
Amounts due Tacoma from City for the Wholesale Water Service shall be determined,
billed and collected by Tacoma and paid by City in accordance with the procedures for
billings, collections and payments set forth in the Wholesale Water Regulations.
Page 7 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi 8z1 of 210
8. WHOLESALE WATER DELIVERIES
From and after the Effective Date, the Wholesale Water Supply shall be made
available to City at the Wholesale Service Connections. The delivery and receipt of water,
and the transfer of title to and custody and control of such water, shall occur at the Wholesale
Service Connections. Upon City's acceptance of such water at the Wholesale Service
Connections, City assumes full responsibility for such water, its quality, and the means,
methods and facilities necessary to connect, receive, transport, deliver and use such water as a
source of water for resale by City to City's retail customers.
9. WHOLESALE WATER CONNECTIONS AND INTERCONNECTION
FACILITIES
9.1 From and after the Effective Date, Tacoma shall be responsible for the
maintenance and operation of the Wholesale Service Connections in a manner that is
consistent with Applicable Law and Prudent Utility Practices. If at any time during the Term
Tacoma shall determine a need to upgrade, replace or modify any of the Wholesale Service
Connections, in whole or in part, Tacoma shall so notify City, and cause such upgrade,
replacement or modification to occur at such time, place and manner and with such labor,
design, materials and equipment as Tacoma shall determine, in its sole discretion. No
wholesale service connections other than the Wholesale Service Connections are authorized
by this Agreement, and no other such connections shall be allowed without a subsequent and
separate written agreement between the Parties. Neither Party shall be obligated to agree to or
execute any agreement or permit with the other Party to construct or use any additional
wholesale service connection.
9.2 From and after the Effective Date, City shall, at its expense, cause the
Interconnection Facilities to be constructed, tested, maintained and available for normal and
reliable commercial operations. City shall submit to Tacoma for review and approval the
designs, specifications and construction schedule for any material repairs or replacements of
the Interconnection Facilities, or for any expansions, improvements or upgrades of the
Interconnection Facilities. Tacoma will not unreasonably delay its review of the designs,
specifications and construction schedule submitted to it by City and will not unreasonably
withhold its approval of such designs, specifications and construction schedule. City will not
commence any such repairs, replacements, expansions, improvements or upgrades of the
Interconnection Facilities unless and until City has received approved designs, specifications
and construction schedule from Tacoma. City shall construct and operate the Interconnection
Facilities in a manner that is consistent with Applicable Law; the approved designs,
specifications and construction schedule; the provisions of all permits, regulatory approvals
and agreements governing the construction and operation of the Interconnection Facilities;
and Prudent Utility Practices. City shall own and operate the Interconnection Facilities and
shall be responsible for the repair and maintenance thereof.
Page 8 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPeg@i @2 of 210
9.3 Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, City shall:
(a) be responsible for the operation and control of the City
Isolation Valve and any pressure- reducing valves, controllers, pedestals and
boxes operated by City as part of the Interconnection Facilities; and
(b) provide a sufficient permitted discharge location for
sump pump discharge for the Wholesale Service Connections vault.
9.4 If, at any time or from time to time during the Term, Tacoma determines a
need to repair, maintain, replace, renew, expand or improve any of Tacoma's infrastructure,
facilities or systems and such work requires the relocation of all or any portion of the
Interconnection Facilities, Tacoma shall, not less than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to
the commencement of such work, request by written notice to City that City relocate such
Interconnection Facilities so as to accommodate the time, place and manner of Tacoma's
work. Upon receipt of such notice from Tacoma, City shall promptly so relocate such
Interconnection Facilities at City's sole cost and expense.
10. METER AND TELEMETRY EQUIPMENT
10.1 Tacoma shall, at City's expense, provide for the procurement, installation,
repair, replacement, calibration and testing of the Meter and the Telemetry Equipment. Such
costs paid by City to Tacoma are considered funds provided in aid of construction. City shall
provide, at its expense, a sufficient and reliable source of power and communications to the
Meter and the Telemetry Equipment. Tacoma shall determine the size of the Meter and the
flow range within which the Meter must operate.
10.2 Tacoma shall perform the calibration and testing of the Meter. During the
Term, Tacoma shall periodically test the Meter for accuracy, and the results of such testing
shall be made available to City. City may also test the Meter at any reasonable time and at
City's expense. The results of any Meter test conducted by City shall be made available to
Tacoma at no charge. A Meter accuracy measurement of two percent (2 %) or better shall be
considered within calibration tolerance.
10.3 If a Party shall require access to any area under the care, custody or control of
the other Party for purposes of this Section 10, then such Party may request such access,
subject to the other Party's prior approval, which such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed.
11. WATER MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING
11.1 On or before May 1 of each year during the Term, City shall provide Tacoma
with a Draft Operating Plan.
11.2 Prior to 10:00 a.m. on any Thursday during the Term, City may submit to
Tacoma, in the manner and in the form established by Tacoma, a schedule for wholesale
Page 9 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi 0 of 210
water deliveries for the following seven (7) days ( "Schedule "). The Schedule shall contain at
a minimum a uniform rate of water deliveries for each day of the Schedule, and shall take
effect on the day following the Thursday the Schedule is submitted. Schedules so submitted
shall remain in effect until replaced by a subsequent Schedule submitted in accordance with
this Section 11.2.
11.3 The Parties agree to jointly develop and maintain operating protocols for items
including the scheduling of water demand to assure consistent flow control and treatment,
routine operational communication, emergency shutdown, emergency contacts and other
items the Parties determine appropriate ( "Operating Protocols "). The Operating Protocols
shall be subject to Tacoma's approval, which such approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld, conditioned or delayed.
11.4 Tacoma reserves the right to modify, suspend, change or amend Schedules and
Operating Protocols as necessary to comply or conform with this Agreement, the Wholesale
Water Regulations, Applicable Law, or Prudent Utility Practices, or to respond to
Uncontrollable Forces. Tacoma will provide City with thirty (30) days' advance notice of any
modifications, suspensions, changes or amendments to the Operating Protocols; provided,
however, if the need to modify, suspend, change or amend the Operating Protocols is
attributable to Uncontrollable Forces, then Tacoma shall provide as much notice as is
practicable under the circumstances.
12. CONSERVATION AND PLANNING
12.1 The Parties will seek to coordinate regional supply, planning, scheduling and
operational programs that promote efficient use of water supplies, facilities, finances and staff
resources. If requested by Tacoma, City shall participate in the planning and implementation
process for conservation programs as they are developed and will share available conservation
resources where beneficial to both Parties. In the event there is a water shortage or drought
that requires Tacoma to institute water rationing or water use restrictions, Tacoma may
institute reductions to deliveries of the Wholesale Water Supply consistent with the
Wholesale Water Regulations and Prudent Utility Practices.
12.2 During the Term, City shall implement and maintain a water conservation and
water curtailment program substantially equivalent to Tacoma's program. Tacoma reserves
the right to reduce or discontinue Wholesale Water Service in the event City fails to adopt and
conform its use of the Wholesale Water Supply to Tacoma's Water Shortage Response Plan.
13. RISK OF LOSS
13.1 Title to and risk of loss of water delivered by Tacoma to City pursuant to
Section 8 shall pass from Tacoma to City at the Wholesale Service Connections.
13.2 Title to the Wholesale Service Connections, the Meter and the Telemetry
Equipment shall be vested in Tacoma. Except as otherwise provided by Section 10.2, City
shall have no right to operate, suspend, curtail, design, construct, test, maintain, repair,
Page 10 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi 9A of 210
improve, replace and use the Wholesale Service Connections, the Meter and the Telemetry
Equipment. Title to the Interconnection Facilities shall be vested in City. Tacoma shall have
no right or responsibility to operate, suspend, curtail, design, construct, test, maintain, repair,
improve, replace or use the Interconnection Facilities.
14. INDEMNIFICATION
City shall defend, indemnify and hold each and all of the Tacoma Indemnitees
harmless from and against any and all claims, liens, demands, actions, losses, damages, costs,
expenses and liabilities (including attorneys' fees) arising directly or indirectly from or in
connection with:
(a) the transportation, storage, sale, delivery and use of any water
delivered to City in accordance with this Agreement;
(b) the negligent, reckless, or otherwise tortious acts or omissions
of City, or of anyone directly or indirectly retained or employed by City, in
performance of this Agreement;
(c) any material breach, failure, inconsistency, inaccuracy or
default of any one or more representations made to Tacoma in Section 20;
(d) the use or resale of the Wholesale Water Supply for fire flows
or fire suppression purposes, or
(e) City Hazardous Substances.
Nothing herein shall, however, require City to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
Tacoma Indemnitees for that portion (if any) of any such liability that is so proportionately
and legally attributable to the negligent acts or omissions of any one or more of the Tacoma
Indemnitees. As between the Parties and solely for the purpose of the indemnities contained
in this Section 14, City expressly waives any immunity, defense or protection that may be
granted to it under the Washington State Industrial Insurance Act, Title 51 RCW, or any other
industrial insurance, workers' compensation or similar laws of the State of Washington to the
fullest extent permitted by Applicable Law. This Section 14 shall not be interpreted or
construed as a waiver of City's right to assert such immunity, defense or protection directly
against any of its own employees or any such employee's estate or other representatives. This
Section 14 has been mutually negotiated by the Parties and shall survive the expiration or
termination of this Agreement.
City's Initials
15. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
The Wholesale Water Service is provided subject to Applicable Law (including
permits, authorization and the jurisdiction of a Governmental Authority to issue orders and
Page i i of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi @5 of 210
regulations regarding the Wholesale Water Service, the Wholesale Water Supply and the
Project). City understands and agrees that Tacoma must comply with all such laws, permits,
authorizations, orders and regulations, and that such laws, permits, authorizations, orders and
regulations are an Uncontrollable Force to the extent that they affect the ability of Tacoma to
fulfill its obligations under this Agreement.
16. NO RIGHT OR CLAIM TO WATER RIGHTS
By this Agreement, City secures a contractual right to receive Wholesale Water
Service and to accept delivery from Tacoma of the Wholesale Water Supply as a wholesale
customer. By this Agreement, City acquires no right, title or interest in or to (a) the Project,
the Wholesale Service Connection, the Meter or the Telemetry Equipment; or (b) any water
rights, water claims, water permits or water certificates.
17. DISPUTE RESOLUTION
17.1 Any and all claims, controversies or disputes arising out of, relating to or in
connection with this Agreement (each, a "Dispute ") as between the Parties shall be resolved in
accordance with the Dispute resolution procedures set forth in this Section 17.
17.2 The Parties shall inform one another promptly following the occurrence or
discovery of any item or event that would reasonably be expected to result in a Dispute
required to be resolved in accordance with this Dispute resolution procedure. The initial
mechanism to resolve Disputes will involve negotiations between the Parties' representatives,
so designated by the Parties by notice given pursuant to Section 23.
17.3 If the Parties cannot resolve a Dispute satisfactorily within ten (10) days after
receipt of the initial notice in accordance with Section 17.2, either Party may deliver to the
other Party notice of the Dispute with a detailed description of the underlying circumstances
of such Dispute. The Dispute notice shall include a schedule of the availability of the
notifying Party's senior officers duly authorized to settle the Dispute during the thirty (30) day
period following the delivery of the Dispute notice. The recipient Party shall, within three (3)
business days following receipt of the Dispute notice, provide to the notifying Party a parallel
schedule of availability of the recipient Party's senior officers duly authorized to settle the
Dispute. Following delivery of the respective senior officers' schedules of availability, the
senior officers of the notifying Party and the recipient Party shall meet and confer, as often as
they deem reasonably necessary during the remainder of the thirty (30) day period, in good -
faith negotiations to resolve the Dispute to the satisfaction of both Parties.
17.4 If at any time during the good -faith efforts to resolve any Dispute arising under
this Agreement either of the Parties determines that such informal discussions will not result
in a resolution of the issue or issues in Dispute, such Party may initiate the Dispute resolution
process in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit B.
17.5 Pending resolution of any Dispute, the Parties shall continue to fulfill their
respective duties under this Agreement.
Page 12 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi W of 210
18. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES
18.1 If a Party fails to perform its obligations hereunder, then it shall be in default
hereunder unless the defaulting Party cures:
(a) a monetary event of default within thirty (30) days after
receiving written notice from the other Party of such monetary default; and
(b) a non - monetary event of default within sixty (60) days after
receiving a notice of default from the non - defaulting Party; provided,
however, that if the nature or extent of the obligation or obligations is such
that more than sixty (60) days are required, in the exercise of commercially
reasonable diligence, to cure such non - monetary default, then the defaulting
Party shall not be in default if it commences such performance within such
sixty (60) day period and thereafter pursues the same to completion with
commercially reasonable diligence.
18.2 Except as otherwise provided by the Wholesale Water Regulations, and subject
to the procedures set forth in Section 17, if a Party is in breach or default of its obligations
arising under this Agreement, the other Party shall have and shall be entitled to exercise any
and all remedies available to it at law or in equity (including the right to specifically enforce
this Agreement), all of which remedies shall be cumulative. If either Party elects to pursue
singularly any remedy available to it under this Section 18, then such Party may at any time
thereafter continue to pursue or cease pursuing that remedy and simultaneously elect to pursue
any other remedy available to it under this Section 18.
19. ADDITIONAL WATER
During the Term, City may request that Tacoma supply City with wholesale water on
a temporary basis in addition to the Wholesale Water Supply ( "Temporary Wholesale Water
Supply "). The availability of the Temporary Wholesale Water Supply for sale by Tacoma to
City at any time or from time to time during the Term shall be determined by Tacoma in its
sole discretion. If Tacoma shall determine that some or all of the Temporary Wholesale
Water Supply is available for sale to City, it may be sold, scheduled, priced and delivered to
City on such terms and conditions as may then be acceptable to the Parties upon approval of
the Parties' applicable governing bodies. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, any
such sales shall be subject to the Wholesale Water Regulations (as applicable), the System
Development Charge, the availability of resources, and the disruption, interruption,
suspension and curtailment of the Temporary Wholesale Water Supply by Tacoma at any
time.
20. REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PARTIES
20.1 Each Party is duly authorized and validly existing under the laws of, is
authorized to exercise its powers, rights and privileges under the laws of, and is in good
standing in the State of Washington, and has full power and authority to carry on its business
Page 13 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi 827 of 210
as presently conducted, to execute this Agreement and to perform the transactions on its part
contemplated by this Agreement.
20.2 The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, have been duly authorized by the
appropriate board or council, and no other act or proceeding on the part of a Party is necessary
to authorize this Agreement, or the transactions contemplated hereby.
20.3 The execution, delivery and performance by each of the Parties of this
Agreement does not (a) contravene Applicable Law; or (b) conflict with or result in a breach
of or default under any material agreement or instrument to which any Party is a party or by
which it is bound.
20.4 There are no actions, suits, claims or proceedings pending or, to the best of
each Party's knowledge, threatened against either Party that is likely to impair the
consummation or the transactions contemplated hereby.
21. TERM
The term of this Agreement (the "Term ") shall commence as of the Effective Date and
shall remain in full force and effect until the date that Tacoma ceases making wholesale water
sales in accordance with the Wholesale Water Regulations.
22. UNCONTROLLABLE FORCES
If performance of this Agreement or of any obligation hereunder (other than the
insufficiency of funds, the financial inability to perform or changes in a Party's cost of
performing its obligations) is prevented or substantially restricted or interfered with by reason
of an Uncontrollable Force, the affected Party, upon giving notice to the other Party, shall be
excused from such performance to the extent of and for the duration of such prevention,
restriction or interference. The affected Party shall use its reasonable efforts to avoid or
remove such causes of nonperformance and shall continue performance hereunder whenever
such causes are removed.
23. NOTICES
23.1 All notices or other communications required or permitted by this Agreement
must be in writing and be personally delivered, delivered by recognized overnight courier
service or given by mail or via facsimile. Any notice given by mail must be sent, postage
prepaid, by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. All notices must be
addressed to the Parties at the following addresses or at such other addresses as the Parties
may from time to time direct in writing:
Page 14 of 18
R E S. g9 i 4- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi 0 of 210
Tacoma: Water Superintendent
P.O. Box 11007
Tacoma, WA 98411
Phone: (253) 502 -8245
Fax: (253) 502 -8694
City: Assistant Director of Engineering /City Engineer
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001
Phone: (253) 931 -3010
Fax: (253) 931 -3053
23.2 Any notice will be deemed to have been given (a) if personally delivered,
when delivered, (b) if delivered by courier service, one (1) business day after deposit with the
courier service, (c) if mailed, two (2) business days after deposit at any post office in the
United States, and (d) if delivered via facsimile, the same day as verified; provided that any
verification that occurs after 5:00 p.m. on a business day, or at any time on a Saturday,
Sunday or holiday, will be deemed to have occurred as of 9:00 a.m. on the following business
day.
24. MISCELLANEOUS
24.1 The rights and obligations of the Parties arising under this Agreement may not
be sold, assigned or otherwise transferred in whole or in part by a Party without the prior
written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or
delayed. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties'
respective successors and permitted assigns.
24.2 The Parties agree that in taking actions or making determinations required or
provided for under this Agreement, each Party shall act in fairness and in good faith. The
Parties will cooperate and use commercially reasonable efforts to facilitate the
implementation of all aspects of this Agreement. During the Term, each Party, upon the
request of the other Party, shall, without further consideration, execute, deliver and
acknowledge all such further documents and do and perform all such other acts and things as
either Party may reasonably request to effectively carry out the intent of this Agreement.
24.3 A Party shall not have the right to offset any amounts owed to the other Party
pursuant to this Agreement against any amounts due from the other Party pursuant to this
Agreement, nor may a Party offset any amounts due to the other Party pursuant to this
Agreement against any amounts owed by the other Party pursuant to this Agreement. A Party
may not withhold any payment due the other Party by reason of a Dispute; such payment shall
be paid "under protest" and any and all Disputes with respect to such payment shall be
resolved pursuant to Section 17.
24.4 Any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement may be waived at any time
and from time to time, in a signed writing, by the Party or Parties entitled to the benefit of
Page 15 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi @9 of 210
such terms or conditions. Any waiver given by a Party shall be narrowly construed to
specifically waive, in time and subject, only the express matter contained in such waiver. The
failure of either Party to insist on or enforce strict performance of any provision of this
Agreement or to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement or Applicable Law will
not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment to any extent of the right to assert or rely upon
any such provision, right or remedy in that or any other instance; rather, the same will be and
remain in full force and effect. Tacoma's review, revision or approval of or comment upon
any matter arising under this Agreement, or Tacoma's failure to review, revise, approve or
comment upon any matter arising under this Agreement, shall not in any way (a) relieve or
release City from any of its obligations arising under this Agreement, or (b) subject Tacoma
to any liability with respect to such matter.
24.5 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Washington (regardless of the laws that might otherwise govern under
applicable principles of conflict of laws of such state). Except with respect to a lawsuit or
judicial action or proceeding commenced by a third party in another jurisdiction and subject
to Exhibit B, the Parties will (a) agree that any lawsuit, judicial action or proceeding arising
out of or relating to this Agreement must be heard in the Superior Court of the State of
Washington, in and for the County of Pierce, or the United States District Court for the
Western District of Washington in Tacoma; (b) waive any objection to the laying of venue of
any such suit, action or proceeding; and (c) irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any such
court in any such lawsuit, judicial action or proceeding.
24.6 Terms defined in a given number, tense or form shall have the corresponding
meaning when used in this Agreement with initial capitals in another number, tense or form.
References containing terms such as "hereof," "herein," "hereto," "hereinafter" and other
terms of like import are not limited in applicability to the specific provision within which such
references are set forth but instead refer to this Agreement taken as a whole. "Includes" or
"including" shall not be deemed limited by the specific enumeration of items, but shall be
deemed without limitation. The term "or" is not exclusive. The headings contained in this
Agreement are included solely for the convenience of the Parties. Accounting terms used but
not defined herein have the meanings given to them under generally accepted accounting
principles in the United States consistently applied throughout the specified period and in the
immediately prior comparable period. The term "day" means a calendar day unless otherwise
specified as a "business day "; a business day means a day, other than a Saturday or Sunday or
public holiday, on which banks are generally open for business in Pierce County, Washington.
24.7 Any provisions of this Agreement prohibited or rendered unenforceable by
Applicable Law shall be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability
without invalidating the remaining provisions of this Agreement. In such event, the
remainder of this Agreement will remain valid and enforceable. Upon such determination
that any term or other provision is prohibited or rendered unenforceable, the Parties shall
negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect the original intent of the
Parties as closely as possible in an acceptable manner to the end that transactions
contemplated under this Agreement are fulfilled to the greatest extent possible.
Page 16 of 18 WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
ResolutioPegoi c%AO of 210
24.8 This Agreement may be amended only by an instrument in writing executed by
the Parties that expressly refers to this Agreement and states that it is an amendment hereto.
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties and supersedes all other
prior agreements and understandings, oral and written, between the Parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof. No amendment, modification or waiver of any provision of this
Agreement will be valid unless set forth in a written instrument signed by both Parties. If a
Party becomes aware of a conflict between this Agreement and any other agreement in place
between such Party and any Person, it will promptly notify such other Party, and the Parties
will work in good faith to resolve the conflict.
24.9 Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed or construed by the
Parties, or by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent, or of
partnership or of joint venture, between the Parties. Neither Party shall enter into any
contract, agreement or other commitment, or incur any obligation or liability, in the name of
or otherwise on behalf of the other Party. This Agreement shall create no rights,
responsibilities and /or obligations in, to or from any Persons other than Tacoma and City.
24.10 Sections 13,14,16,17,18, 20, 24.5 and all other terms and conditions of this
Agreement that must be reasonably construed to survive the expiration or termination of this
Agreement in order to give full force and effect to the intent of the Parties as set forth herein
shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement, regardless of whether such
survival is expressly specified herein.
24.11 This Agreement may be executed in several counterparts, each of which shall
be deemed to be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
24.12 This Agreement has been negotiated on an arm's- length basis by the Parties
and their respective counsel and shall be interpreted fairly in accordance with its terms and
without any strict construction in favor of or against either Party.
Page 17 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPegol c%A1 of 210
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have duly executed this Agreement as of the
Effective Date.
Dated this day of
City of Tacoma
Department of Public Utilities
Water Division
Linda A. McCrea
Water Superintendent
Approved as to form:
Page 18 of 18
R E S . 0914- 0002/LEGAL 120772987.5
, 2014.
City of Auburn
Nancy Backus
Mayor
Approved as to form:
WHOLESALE WATER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
ResolutioPi egoi dD2 of 210
MI_ONS SPFCVICXTIONS
A SF
,F,,
Lt OCF, CoNNF
Pressure Flow 'Capacity
op-Ta`-, capacity
(PS71) To/From
b,t,,tie Locaflor'L CMecfionL Meter To/From -0faiv
,Nubum _Ufil� 3
Tacoma ps-,abum Tacoma 11201)
Size 253 309
size 894 AVD
6" (NGVD2
Tacoma water 99)
5 '3200 9) 63
at 4,500
4V St Nw 579 173
W, TRV 3
994 VD (PRV 2,200)
S-EA-765+05 (NGVD*2
Tacoma Water 9)
Pipeline 5 at Datma-
lpe uhmn)
.3�rd,k-ve.SE, NkvDss
,t le-T+J�*e
(Tacoma) Da'= is 3 _4'1 fee
AA, 933+1-00) bathe NGVD29
'fic ae"", ous,rewelr`
Note- for comec�don Spec,
0
C: CTION'
cONNE
at SERVICE
0 V�"OLESALE
E��WbAA —Page Of 2
70914-oOO2,,LEG_kL'207729
RES-1 ------
AUBURN Jq-- LNfETRr r' •a 'PRY
PEDESTAL
AUBURN' FRV - UCOMA TELEMETRY
PFAFSTAL 'AUBURN. .
BURN
'�' • �, w' ` II' '` lB.EMETRY FEOESTAL
TACOMA
TEI
T- PEDESTAL AUBURN'RESPONSTBTLIT' i
F- YACOMA RES 'rM /�6URN RESPONS81UTY
(/1 a. TACOMA ;t �. YN 't37 F E µ � — — TACOMA RESPONS8(LrTY
FSOLATION ', r
f PIFELfNE •, S {' 'kNTE E t 7AC.OMd ISOLAY10N `VALVE
C4 VALVE i — —' p
2 * �- ..,�= �•.'.•'k��a` �'�'-,- - T . p .� i PtPEt3NE' �`5
-- 'TACOMA: 'METER. VAULT ','FOR'
.y t - AUBURN INTE"E
TACOMA; MMR WAULT'FOR
AUBURN INTERTFE
k x
[:TACOMA: METER:.
VAULT FOR WD$Z ?I INTERT.£
x tty.. f
� STA 765+�05
STA 933 +0Q
W- AUBURN . WA 296nQ 1..2nd AVE. SE KENT WA
A 32OU B ST N SCALL N.T.S-
SCALE: N.T_s.
z
0
0
WHOLESALE SERVICE CONNECTIONS
Exhibit A — Page 2 of 2
RE cS70914- 0002/LEGAL120772997.5
Exhibit B
Dispute Resolution Procedures
The following procedures shall govern the resolution of any dispute arising under the
Wholesale Water Supply Agreement dated (the "Agreement ") between the
Parties that cannot be resolved by good -faith negotiations between the Parties, unless the
Parties mutually agree to use different procedures to resolve a specific dispute by executing a
document setting forth such different procedures. The Parties agree that these dispute
resolution procedures are intended to be used in conjunction with and governed by
Chapter 4.48 RCW, and both Parties hereby waive their right to a trial by jury for any dispute
arising under the Agreement.
The Party that believes that continued good -faith negotiations will not produce a
resolution of the issue or issues that are the subject of such negotiations will notify the
other Party in writing that it is invoking the dispute resolution procedures of this
Exhibit B.
2. Within twenty (20) days of the date of such notice invoking the dispute resolution
procedures of this Exhibit B, the Parties shall meet and select an individual to
recommend to the court as referee of the dispute resolution process in accordance with
RCW 4.48.020. The Parties shall select an individual who is qualified as a juror as
provided by statute, is competent as a juror between the Parties, is a duly admitted and
practicing attorney, and has experience presiding over civil litigation of contract
disputes. The Parties will use the following procedure to select the recommended
referee:
2.1 Each Party will make a list of three individuals that are qualified pursuant to
Paragraph 2 to serve as referee and exchange such list with the other Party. If
the Parties agree upon a person from either list, or if both Parties list the same
person, that person will be the recommended referee.
2.2 If the Parties are unable to agree upon a referee after exchanging their
respective lists, they will make a joint list setting forth all six candidates from
the two lists.
Upon the selection of the recommended referee, or the creation of the joint list
pursuant to Subparagraph 2.2 of this Exhibit B, the Party that invoked the dispute
resolution procedures shall file a complaint, in the superior court of the appropriate
county as set forth in Section 24.5 of the Agreement, setting forth the issue or issues in
dispute, and the other Party shall file an answer to such complaint. Not later than
twenty (2 0) days after the filing of the answer, the Parties shall jointly file a motion,
with the Agreement (including this Exhibit B) attached, with the court requesting an
order of reference that:
Exhibit B — Page i of 3
RES . 0914- 0002 /LEGAL120772987.5
DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
ResolutioPi egoi dD5 of 210
3.1 Directs that the issue or issues raised by the complaint and answer be resolved
pursuant to Chapter 4.48 RCW by reference to a referee;
3.2 Appoints, pursuant to RCW 4.48.020, either the recommended referee selected
by the Parties pursuant to Subparagraph 2.1 of this Exhibit B, or a single
referee from the joint list prepared pursuant to Subparagraph 2.2 of this
Exhibit B; and
3.3 Directs the referee to conduct the proceeding in accordance with the
procedures set out in Paragraphs 4 -10 of this Exhibit B.
4. In accordance with RCW 4.48.060, the Parties hereby waive their rights to discovery
and cross - examination, and direct that the proceeding be conducted in the same
manner as a motion for summary judgment as follows:
4.1 The Parties shall present their respective positions by written briefs and
affidavits, and without testimonial evidence or cross - examination;
4.2 Oral argument will be conducted before the referee; and
4.3 The burdens of proof and persuasion that pertain in a civil trial shall apply,
rather than those that apply to motions for summary judgment.
After appointment of the referee, the Parties shall endeavor in good faith to prepare for
the referee a joint statement of facts and the questions to be decided in the proceeding.
In the absence of an agreed -to joint statement of facts and questions to be decided,
each Party may include its own statement of facts and questions to be decided in its
initial brief.
6. Within ninety (90) days after the submission of the joint statement of facts and
questions to be decided, or within ninety (90) days after the appointment of the referee
if the Parties cannot agree to a joint submission of facts and questions to be decided,
each Party shall submit to the referee a one -page statement of the proposed resolution
and /or award it seeks for each issue in dispute, and its initial brief. The statement and
initial brief (excluding any attached affidavits or evidentiary documents) shall not
exceed fifty (50) 81/2" x 11" double- spaced pages with 11/2 -inch margins and 12 -point
typeface. The statement and initial brief shall be filed simultaneously by e -mail and
regular mail with the referee and opposing Party.
7. Within thirty (30) days after the date the Parties filed their initial briefs, the Parties
shall file their respective reply briefs with the referee and the opposing Party. The
reply briefs (excluding any attached affidavits or evidentiary documents) shall not
exceed twenty -five (25) 81/2" x 11" double- spaced pages with 11/2 -inch margins and
12 -point typeface. The reply briefs shall be filed simultaneously by e -mail and regular
mail with the referee and opposing Party.
Exhibit B — Page 2 of 3
RES . 0914- 0002 /LEGAL120772987.5
DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
ResolutioPi egoi dD6 of 210
After the reply briefs have been filed, if the referee deems that additional responses are
needed, then the referee may request that the Parties file a supplemental brief only as
to those specific matters or questions raised by the referee. Such supplemental briefs
shall be limited to fifteen (15) 81/2" x 11" double- spaced pages with 11/2 -inch margins
and 12 -point typeface, and shall be filed at such time requested by the referee. Any
such supplemental briefs shall be filed simultaneously by e -mail and regular mail upon
the referee and opposing Party.
9. When all briefs have been filed, the referee will schedule oral argument on the issue or
issues in dispute.
10. After the completion of oral argument, the referee will prepare his or her proposed
report in accordance with RCW 4.48.70 and shall provide a copy of the proposed
report to the Parties, who shall have the right to suggest changes and modifications to
the proposed report, all in accordance with RCW 4.48.110. The referee will file the
final report with the court within twenty (20) days of the completion of the process
under RCW 4.48.110.
11. Either Party may move the court to modify or set aside, in whole or in part, the final
report of the referee. If the court modifies or sets aside, in whole or in part, the final
report of the referee and makes another reference, then this Exhibit B shall also apply
to such reference.
12. Each Party shall be responsible for its own costs of the dispute resolution process
(including any judicial proceedings), and the Parties shall each pay one -half of the
other costs of the dispute resolution proceeding, including the fees of the referee. The
fees of the referee shall be established in accordance with RCW 4.48.100.
Exhibit B — Page 3 of 3
RES . 0914- 0002 /LEGAL120772987.5
DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES
ResolutioPi egoi dD7 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N'
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5103
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 22, 2014
Department: Attachments: Budget Impact:
Finance Resclubai No. 5103 $0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5103.
Background Summary:
In July 2014, Council approved a budget amendment that included $125,000.00 for
the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar Enclosure project. Final estimates of the cost
for the project now exceed $200,000.00. The Airport Fund does not have the
additional funding available to complete the project. The Capital Improvements Fund
has sufficient funds from which to transfer funds in an amount not to exceed
$200,000.00, in order to cover the additional cost of the project. An interfund loan will
cover the additional project cost, and will be repaid with interest over a five -year
period, with new revenues generated from rentals for the enclosed hangars being
pledged to the repayment.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Municipal Services
Councilmember: Peloza Staff: Coleman
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: RES.0
RES.0 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 108 of 210
RESOLUTION NO. 5 1 0 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF
FUNDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING A LOAN OR LOANS
FROM THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND TO THE AIRPORT
FUND FOR UP TO A FIVE -YEAR PERIOD OF TIME
WHEREAS, in July 2014 the City Council authorized a budget
amendment that included funding for the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar
Enclosure Project in the amount of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($125,000.00); and
WHEREAS, the estimated cost of the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar
Enclosure Project has increased; and
WHEREAS, revenues in the Airport Fund are limited in nature; and
WHEREAS, there are insufficient funds available in the Airport Fund to
cover the revised cost of the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar Enclosure
Project; and
WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Fund has sufficient funds from
Which to transfer funds in an amount not to exceed TWO HUNDRED
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00) for the purpose of making loans to cover
the cost of the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar Enclosure Project for the
Airport Fund (Fund No. 435); and
Resotution No, 5103
pSeeptember 23, 2014
RES�ge 1 of 3
Page 109 of 210
WHEREAS, in the event a loan is made from the Capital Improvements
Fund (Fund No. 328) to the Airport Fund (Fund No. 435) as provided above, the
loan shall bear interest at the State of Washington pool rate; and
WHEREAS, the repayment of the loan, including principal and interest,
would be made using new revenues from the enclosed hangars pledged to the
repayment.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose. Authorization is hereby given for the transfer of
funds from the Capital Improvements Fund to the Airport Fund, to cover the
cost of the Auburn Municipal Airport T Hangar Enclosure Project, in an amount
not to exceed TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($200,000.00) for the
purpose of making a loan bearing interest at the Washington State pool rate.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out
the directions of this legislation.
DATED and SIGNED this day of , 2014.
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
------------------------------
Resolution No. 5103
September 23, 2014
RES.�,ge 2 of 3
Page 110 of 210
ATTEST:
Danielle Daskarn
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Held
City Attorney
------------------------
Resolution No. 5103
September 23, 2014
RES.%ge 3 of 3
Page 111 of 210
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N1
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5104
Department:
Community Development
& Public Works
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Attachments:
Resclution No. 51
Attachment A to Resclution No. 51
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5104.
Background Summary:
Date:
September 29, 2014
Budget Impact:
$0
In 2012, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs) amendments
consistent with Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040 became effective.
Auburn ratified the amendments November 2011. When those amendments were
sent to Washington State Department of Commerce for review by Pierce County (as
required by RCW), Commerce commented on the Urban Growth Area (UGA) and
Annexation policies recommending that Pierce County relook at those to be consistent
with state law. There have also been Growth Management Hearings Board decisions
as well as a Superior Court decision involving the City of Bonney Lake that clearly
determine how urban growth areas are to be expanded consistent with the Growth
Management Act.
In 2013 when Pierce County was amending its Comprehensive Plan to be consistent
with the CPPs, the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) considered an
amendment that would have amended Pierce County's comprehensive plan policies
and required a county -wide need for growth capacity prior to allowing an Urban
Growth Area expansion, rather than allowing for an individual jurisdiction to expand
based on individual capacity need. This amendment would have made Pierce
County's comprehensive plan consistent with the already adopted CPPs (the 2012
effective version). At that time, some PCRC members were concerned with this
limitation for individual jurisdictions and did not take action on Pierce County's
comprehensive plan amendment and remanded the issued back to Growth
Management Coordination Committee (GMCC) for consideration.
After several months of discussion, the GMCC recommended 3 options to the PCRC.
Part of the GMCC recommendation also included the following:
RES.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 112 of 210
A terminology change from "urban service area" to "Potential Annexation
Area ", similar to how King County designates areas to be annexed to cities
An encouragement of joint planning agreements for existing areas affiliated
with cities and towns
Exploring and establishing financial incentives for annexation
Limiting cities and towns to annex territory within their adopted PAA
Joint grant funding opportunities
Unincorporated islands as top priority for annexation
This was presented to the PCRC at their May 15, 2014 meeting. At the conclusion of
the discussion, PCRC recommended approval of Option 3 which did not change the
CPPs related to amendments and transitions but did amend the CPPs as noted
above.
Amendments to the CPPs must be ratified by 60 percent of the jurisdictions in Pierce
County representing 75 percent of the total population. Cities and towns have the
option of passing an ordinance /resolution or if not in favor of the proposal passing a
resolution in opposition. If no action is taken by a jurisdiction within 180 days or by
December 21, 2014 that is seen as approval.
The Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the amended
policies at their September 8, 2014 and September 22, 2014 meetings and
recommended approval of Resolution No. 5104 to full City Council.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Planning And Community Development, Public Works Other: Legal, Planning
Councilmember: Holman Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: RES.D
RES.D AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 113 of 210
RESOLUTION NO. 51 0 4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
WITH PIERCE COUNTY, THEREBY AMENDING THE
PIERCE COUNTY COUNTYWIDE PLANNING
POLICIES RELATED TO ANNEXATIONS AND
URBAN GROWTH AREA EXPANSIONS
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1990, the Growth Management Act (the GMA) became
effective (Chapter 36.70A Revised Code of Washington); and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act. requires Counties, Cities, and Towns
to plan for housing affordable to all economic segments of the population; and
WHEREAS, on January 31, 1995, the Pierce County Council passed Resolution
R95 -17 affrrming the commitment of the County to continue discussions with other local
jurisdictions to resolve implementation of the Growth Management Act; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies are written policy
statements which are to be used solely for establishing a countywide framework from
Which the County and Municipal comprehensive plans are developed and adopted; and
WHEREAS, the City participated in the amendment process and helped develop
the proposed Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies through participation in
Pierce County's Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GMCC), a staff level
committee that reviews amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies and makes recommendations to the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC);
and
Resolution No. 5104
R �mbar 18, 2014
1 of 1
Page 114 of 210
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Regional Council recommended adoption of the
proposed amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies on May 15,
2014; and
WHEREAS, the Pierce County Council adopted Ordinance No. 2014 -17s on
June 24, 2014; and
WHEREAS, the Planning and Community Development Committee reviewed the
amended policies at their September 8, 2014 meeting and made a recommendation to
the full City Council at their September 22, 2014 meeting; and
WHEREAS, amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
must be adopted through amendment of the original interlocal agreement or by a new
interlocal agreement ratified by 60 percent of member jurisdictions in Pierce County
representing 75 percent of the total population; and
WHEREAS, an interlocal agreement titled "Amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies" was developed for the purpose of implementing the
recommended amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The amendments to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies are attached as Exhibit A to this Resolution.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to execute the interlocal agreement for the
purpose of amending the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies in accordance
with the requirements of the Interlocal Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter 39.34 RCW.
Resolution No. 5104
September 18, 2014
R %P2 of 2
Page 115 of 210
Section 3. That a copy of the resolution and signed interlocal agreement
authorizing approval shall be provided to Pierce County.
Section 4. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section v. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures hereon.
Dated and signed this day of , 2014.
CITY OF AUBURN
NANCY BACKUS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPF fOVEDAS TO FORM:
B. Hbid -, City Attorri
Resolution No. 5104
Septp,mber 18, 2014
of
Page 116 of 210
Exhibit A Resolution No. 5104
RES.D Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County ia 17 of 210
930 Tacoma Ave SCOUt
Page 1 of 3 Rm 046
Tacoma, WA 98402
H
M
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Whereas, amendments to the CPPs must be adopted through amendment of the
original interlocal agreement or by a new interlocal agreement ratified by 60 percent of
member jurisdictions in Pierce County representing 75 percent of the total population,
and
Whereas, demonstration of ratification shall be by execution of an interlocal
agreement or the absence of a legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment',
and
Whereas, an Interlocal Agreement entitled "Amendments to the Pierce County
Countywide Planning Policies" has been developed for this purpose, and is included as
Exhibit B to this Ordinance; and
Whereas, a jurisdiction shall be deemed as casting an affirmative vote if it has
not taken legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment within 180 days from
the date the Pierce County Council formally authorizes the Pierce County Executive to
enter into an iinterlocal agreement; and
Whereas, when ratified by the necessary number of cities and towns, Section
19D.240 of the Pierce County Code (PC,C), "Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies", shall be amended by a subsequent ordinance of the County Council to
incorporate the recommended proposal; and
Whereas, the Pierce County Planning Commission, at its November 26, 2013,
regular public hearing, reviewed the proposed amendments to the CPPS and
recommended approval, and
Whereas, the Pierce County Environmental official has determined the proposal
is exempt from SEPA per WAC 197-11-800 (19), and
Whereas, after a properly noticed public hearing, the Community Development
Committee of the Pierce County Council considered oral and written testimony and
forwarded its recommendation to the full County Council; and
Whereas, the County Council held a public hearing on June 24, 2014, where oral
and written testimony was considered; and
Whereas, the County Council finds that it is in the public interest to authorize the
Pierce County Executive to execute the interlocal agreement; Now Therefore,
Section 1. The Pierce County Council acknowledges its approval of the
amendments to the CPPs recommended by the Pierce County Regional Council as set
forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
RES.D Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County coins 8 of 210
Page 2 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S, yam 1 ®,
Oqe
Tacorna, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Section 2. The Pierce County Council authorizes the Pierce County Executive to
execute Interlocal Agreements as set forth in Exhibit B, which is attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference, thereby ratifying the attached amendments to the
CPPs and amending Chapter 19D.240 of the Pierce County Code as recommended by
the Pierce County Regional Council.
Section 3. The Pierce County Council adopts Findings of Fact as shown in
Exhibit C, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
I IfV11 — 1 vl�"(2-
PASSED this day of , �G�11 2014.
EN11401
-4 at 151)
Denise D. Johnson
1 Clerk of the Council
Date of Publication of
PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL
Pierce County, Washington
Dan Roach
Council air
Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County C
RES.D 930 Tacoma Ave,S -'C"'L P*eof 210
Page 3 of 3 Tacoma WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
RES.D
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s
Proposed Amendments
to the
Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies
Addressing
and
Annexation
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce Count
Page I of 15 930 Tacoma Av County 0 0 of 210
c
Tacoma, WA 88462
1
2 GOUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICY ON URBAN GROWTH AREAS,
3 PROMOTION OF CONTIGUOUS AND ORDERLY DEVELOPMENT
4 AND PROVISION OF URBAN SERVICES TO SUCH DEVELOPMENT
5
6 Background - Requirements of Growth Management Act
7
8 The Washington State Growth Management Act has as planning goals the
9 encouragement of development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and
10 services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner [RCW 36.70A.020(1)],the
11 reduction of sprawl (i.e., the inappropriate or premature conversion of undeveloped land
12 into low-density development) [RCW 36,70A,020(2)], and the provision of adequate public
13 facilities and services necessary to support urban development at the time the
14 development is available for occupancy and use (without decreasing current service levels
15 below locally established minimum standards) [RCW 36.70A.020(12)] as planning goals.
16
17 The Growth Management Act further requires (1), that the County designate an "urban
18 growth area" (UGA) or areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside
19 of which growth shall occur only if it is not ""urban" in character,- (2) that each municipality in
20 the Couinty be included within an UGA, (3) that an UGA include territory outside of existing
21 municipal boundaries only if such territory is characterized by urban growth or is adjacent
22 to territory that is already characterized by urban growth, [(RCW 36.70A. 11 10(l); for
23 definition of "urban growth"' see RCW 36.70A.0130(17).]
24
25 The designated UGAs shall be of adequate size and appropriate permissible densities so
26 as to accommodate the urban growth that is projected by the State Office of Financial
27 Management to occur in the County for the succeeding 20-year period. While each UGA
28 shall permit urban densities, it shall also include greenbelt and open space areas [RCW
29 36.70A.110(2)].
30
31 As to the timing and sequencing of urban growth and development over the 20-year
32 planning period, urban growth shall occur first in areas already characterized by urban
33 growth that have existing public facility and service capacities to service such
34 development, second in areas already characterized by urban growth that will be served
35 by a combination of both existing public facilities and services, and any additional needed
36 public facilities and services that are provided by either public or private sources [RCW
37 36.70& 110(3)]. Urban government services shall be provided primarily by cities, and it is
38 not appropriate that urban governmental services be extended to or expanded in rural
39 areas except in those limited circumstances shown to be necessary to protect basic public
40 health and safety and environment, and when such services are financially supportable at
41 rural densities and do not permit urban development [RCW 36.70A.110(4)].
42
43 The Growth Management Act Amendments expressly require that countywide planning
44 policies address the iimplementation of UGA designations [RCW 36.70A.210(3)(a)], the
45 promotion of contiguous and orderly development, the provision of urban services to such
46 development [RCW 36,70A.210(3)(b)1, and the coordination of joint county and municipal
47 planning within UGAs [RCW 36.70A,210(3)(fl].
RES.D
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County C OU r
Page 2 of 15 930 Tacoma Ava SRm IF10 1 of 210
Tacoma, WA 98402 0
I
4
I
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ILTAU'ren IMEUREMEMM. 11n.
VISION 2040 calls for a more efficient, sustainable, and strategic use of the region's land.
It identifies urban lands as a critical component to accommodate population and
employment growth in a sustainable way. VISION 2040 calls for directing development to
the region's existing urban lands, especially in centers and compact communities, and
limiting growth on rural lands. The Regional Growth! Strategy found in VISION 2040
allocates 93 percent of the region's future population growth and 97 percent of its
employment growth into the existing urban growth area. Cities are divided into four distinct
groups: Metropolitan Cities, Core Cities, Large Cities, and Small Cities. An additional
geography is Unincorporated Urban Growth Areas. VISION 2040 recognizes that
unincorporated urban lands are often similar in character to cities they are adjacent to,
calling for them to be affiliated with adjacent cities for joint planning purposes and future
annexation.
VISION 2040 recognizes that compact development creates vibrant, livable, and healthy
urban communifies, that offer economic opportunities for all', provide housing and
transportation choices, and use our resources wisely. The Multicounty Planning Policies
support the effective use of urban land and include provisions that address brownfield and
contaminated site clean-up, the development of compact communities and centers with
pedestrian-friendly, transit-oriented locations and a mix of residences, jobs, retail, and
other amenities, and the siting, of facilities and major public amenities in compact urban
communities and centers.
VISION 2040 recognizes that centers provide easy access to jobs, services, shopping,
and entertainment. With their mix of uses and pedestrian-friendly design, they can rely
less on forms of transportation that contribute to air pollution and greenhouse gas
emissions. VISION 2040 identifies 27 regional growth centers. These places play an
important role as locations of the region's most significant business, governmental, and
cultural facilities. The 18 cities that have one or more regional growth centers are
expected to accommodate a significant portion of the region's iresiidential growth (53
percent) and employment growth (71 percent).
VISION 2040 calls for local jurisdictions with regional growth centers to adopt housing
and employment targets for each center. Eight regional manufacturing/industrial centers
have also been designated. These are locations for more intensive commercial and
industrial activity. Both regional growth centers and regional manufacturing /industrial
centers are focal points for economic development and transportation infrastructure
investments. Subregional centers, including downtowns in suburban cities and other
neighborhood centers, also play an important role in VISION 2040's Regional Growth
Strategy. These, too, are strategic locations for concentrating jobs, housing, shopping,
and recreational opportunities. VISION 2040 calls for each of the region's cities to
develop one or more central' places as compact mixed-use hubs for concentrating
residences, jobs, shops, and community facilities.
RES.D
Exhibit A to Ordinance No, 2014-17s Pierce County C
Page 3 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S, U 1?40 2 of 210
R O,
Tacoma, WA 98402 10
1 Urban services addressed in VISION 2040 include wastewater and stormwater systems,
2 solid waste, energy, telecommunications, emergency services, and water supply. An
3 overarching goal of VISION 2040 , is to provide sufficient and efficient public services and
4 facilities in a manner that is healthy, safe, and economically viable. Conservation is a
5 major theme throughout VISION 2040. The Multicounty Planning Policies address
6 increasing recycling and reducing waste and encouraging more efficient use of water, low-
7 impact development techniques, and renewable and alternative energy. The Muiticounty
8 Planning Policies also address siting of public facilities and the appropriateness and scale
9 of particular public services.
10
11 VISION 2040 calls for jurisdictions to invest in facilities and amenities that serve centers
12 and restrict urban facilities in rural and resource areas. The Multicounty Planning Policies
13 also discourage schools and other institutions serving urban residents from locating
14 outside the urban growth area.
15
16 Principles of Understanding Between Pierce County and the Municipalities in Pierce
17 County
18
19 While following the goals and regulations of the Growth Management Act, Pierce County
20 and the municipalities in Pierce County will' strive to protect the individual identities and
21 spirit of each of our cities and of the rural areas and unincorporated communities.
22
23 Further agreements will be necessary to carry out the framework of joint planning adopted
24 herein. These agreements will be between the County and each city and between the
25 various cities,.
26
27 The services provided within our communities, by special purpose districts are of vital
28 importance to our citizens. Consistent with the adopted regional strategy, these districts
29 will be part of future individual and group negotiations under the framework adopted by the
30 County and municipal governments.
31
32 While the Growth Management Act defines sewer service as an urban service, Pierce
33 County currently is a major provider of both sewer transmission and treatment services,
34 The County and municipalities recognize that it is appropriate for the County and
35 municipalities to continue to provide sewer transmission and treatment services.
36
37 The County recognizes that unincorporated lands within UGAs are often Potential
38 Annexation Areas for cities. Although annexation is preferred, these are also areas where
39 incorporation of new cities could occur. The County will work with existing municipalities
40 and emerging communities to make such transitions efficiently. The identification of
41 "Potential Annexation Areas" (PAAs) is intended to serve as the foundation for future
42 strategies to annex areas within the urban growth area. A Potential Annexation Area refers
43 to an unincorporated area within the designated urban growth area which a city or town
44 has identified as being appropriate for annexation at some point in the future, A Potential
45 Annexation Area designation does not obligate a jurisdiction to annex an area within a
46 defined timeline. It is the County's authority, in consultation with cities and towns, to adopt
47 the urban growth area(s), and identify individual Potential Annexation Areas.
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County
RES.D c
Page 4 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S"r,"F% 3 of 210
90
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2 In order to promote logical, orderly, and systematic annexations of the urban growth
3 area(s), the County in partnership with cities and towns, should establish joint planning
4 agreements and annexation plans prior to expanding or adding to existing PAAs. Creation
5 of new PAAs prior to the annexation of existing PAAs may directly impact Pierce County
6 government and its service obligations, and may undermine the transition of existing
7 unincorporated lands into cities and towns,
8
9 The County encourages cities and towns to annex land within its respective PAAs. The
10 County recognizes cities and towns may not have a financial incentive to annex areas that
11 will require more expenditures than the revenue produced through property or sales tax.
12 Jurisdictions need to be creative in identifying potential financial incentives, in addition to
13 establishing partnerships to overcome the financial obstacles. As a means to allocate
14 resources, the County should prioritize the PAAs, with the highest being unincorporated
15 "islands" between cities, and towns. Pierce County shall support future annexations for
16 areas in which a joint planning agreement exists between the County and appropriate city
17 or town.
18 1
19 At the same time, annexations and incorporations have direct and significant iimpacts on
20 the revenue of County government, and therefore, may affect the ability of the County to
21 fulfill its role as a provider of certain regional services. The municipalities will work closely
22 with the County to develop appropriate revenue sharing and contractual services
23 arrangements that facilitate the goals of GMA.
24
25 The Countywide Planning Poficiesare intended' to be the consistent "theme" of growth
26 management planning arnong the County and municipalities. The policies also spell out
27 processes and mechanisms designed to foster open communication and feedlback among
28 the jurisdictions. The County, and the cities and towns, will adhere to the processes and
29 mechanisms provided in the policies.
30
31 Growth Targets
32
33 The Regional Growth Strategy set forth, in VISION 2040 provides guidance for the
34 distribution of future population and employment growth through the year 2040 within the
35 Central Puget Sound Region, This strategy, in combination with the Office of Financial
36 Managiement's population forecasts, provides a framework for establishing growth targets
37 consistent with the requirements of the Growth Management Act. Consistent with VISION
38 2040, these growth targets are the minimum number of residents, housing units, or jobs a
39 given jurisdiction is planning to accommodate within the appropriate planning horizon and
40 are informational tools integrated into local land use plans to assist in formulating future
41 residential and employment land needs. These targets are to be developed through a
42 collaborative countywide process that ensures all jurisdictions are accommodating a fair
43 share of growth.
44
45 Achievement of the future envisioned by VISION 2040 will be challenging. Jurisdictions in
46 some regional geographies will likely be planning for growth targets that are above or
47 below the policy direction set by the Regional Growth Strategy because they are on a
OU ierce County
Exhibit A to Orddnance No. 2014-17s Pierce 930 Tacoma Ave S. Rm
Page 5 of 15 IF1
Tacoma, WA 95402 0 4 of 210
go
1 front- or back - (loaded growth trajectory toward 2040. In Other regional geographies,
2 recent growth has been at such significant Odds with the policy direction set by the
3 Regional Growth Strategy (such as recent growth in unincorporated urban Pierce
4 County from 2000 to 2007 has already accounted for more than half of the 40 -year
5 growth allocation), that the 2040 goal will likely be exceeded. In such cases,
6 jurisdictions are asked to set growth targets as close to VISION 2040 as reasonably
7 possible in an effort to "bend the trend" of future growth to more closely conform to the
s Regional Growth Strategy. If a jurisdiction's adopted target is lower or higher than
9 expected from a straight -line application of the Regional Growth Strategy, certification
10 by the Puget Sound Regional Council) (PSRC) will be based on the actions and
11 measures taken or proposed to be put in place to bend the trend, not just on an
12 assessment of the adopted targets.
13
14 It is recognized that some of the urban growth areas in existence prior to the adoption of
15 VISION 2040 may contain more potential housing and employment capacity based
16 uipon zoning, allowed density, land division patterns, and other factors than is needed to
17 accommodate the growth target of the associated geography. I'n many cases, these
13 urban growth areas have been in existence for a decade or more, contain existing
19 development patterns, which are urban in character, and are served by sanitary sewer
20 and other urban infrastructure. These areas are largely expected to remain within the
21 urban growth area consistent with their urban character. Expansion of the urban growth
22 area boundaries that do not comply with provisions in the .Amendments and Transition
23 section of these policies is acknowledged to be inconsistent with CPPs and is strongly
24 discouraged.
25
26 Centers
27
23 Centers are to be areas of concentrated employment and/or housing within UGAs which
29 serve as the hubs of transit and transportation systems. Centers and connecting corridors
30 are integral to creating compact urban development that conserves resources and creates
31 additional transportation, housing, and shopping choices. Centers are an important part of
32 the regional strategy (VISION 2040) for urban growth and are required to be addressed in
33 the Countywide Planning Policies, Centers will become focal points for growth within the
34 County's UGA and will be areas where public investment is directed.
35
36 Centers are to:
37 a be priority locations for accommodating growth;
38 ® strengthen existing development patterns;
39 0 promote housing opportunities close to employment;
40 0 support development of an extensive multimodal transportation system which
41 reduces dependency on automobiles;
42 w reduce congestion and improve air quality; and
43 0 maximize the benefit of public investment in infrastructure and services.
44
45 VISION 2040, the adopted regional growth strategy, identifies several centers as an
46 integral feature for accommodating residential and employment growth. The strategy
47 describes Regional Growth Centers, and other centers that may be designated through
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014 -17s Pierce County c ®ur�4�
RES.D Wage 6 of 15 930TaccmaAv , Rm P 5 of 210
Tacoma, 'WA M402
1 countywide processes or locally. Regional Growth Centers once regionally designated are
2 located either in Metropolitan Cities, or in Core Cities, VISION 2040 also identifies
3 Manufacturing/industrial Centers, which consist primarily of manufacturing and industrial
4 uses, Pierce County has five Regional Growth Centers and two Manufacturing/Industrial
5 Centers that have been adopted into the regional growth strategy. Pierce County Regional
6 Growth Centers are located in Tacoma, which is a Metropolitan City, and in Lakewood and
7 Puyallup, which are Core Cities.
8
9 Re Tonal Growth Centers in the Metropolitan City
10 Tacoma Central Business District
11 Tacoma Mail
12
13 Regional Growth Centers in Core Cities
14 Lakewood
15 Puyallup Downtown
16 Puyallup South Hill
17
18 Currently there are no designated Countywide Centers.
19
20 Manufacturing/Industrial Centers are areas where employee- or land- intensive uses will be
21 located, These centers differ from Regional Growth Centers, in that they consist of an
22 extensive land base and the exclusion of non - manufacturing or manufacturing- supportive
23 uses is an essential feature of their character. These areas are characterized by a
24 significant amount of manufacturing, industrial, and advanced technology employment
25 uses. Large retail and non - related office uses are discouraged. Other than caretakers'
26 residences, housing is prohibited within Manufacturing/industrial Centers. However, these
27 centers should be linked to high density housing areas by an efficient imultimodal
28 transportation system. The efficiency of rail, and overland freight to markets is the critical
29 element for manufacturers and industries located in these centers.
30
31 The designated Man ufacturing/l ndustrial Centers, within Pierce County are as follows:
32
33
34 ManufactuirinqJIndustrial Centers
35 Frederickson
36 Port of Tacoma
37
38 Within Pierce County, a limited number of additional centers may be designated through
39 amendment of the Countywide Planning Policies consistent with the process below.
40
41 Designated centers may vary substantially in the number of households and jobs, they
42 contain today. The intent of the Countywide Planning Policies is that Regional Growth
43 Centers become attractive places to live and work, while supporting efficient public
44 services such as transit and being responsive to the local market for jobs and housing.
45
46 The Countywide Planning Policies establish target levels for housing and employment
47 needed to achieve the benefit of a center. Some centers will reach these levels over the
I
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County coutbQY6 of 210
Page 7 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S,
Tacoma, WA 98402
2
a
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
next twenty years, while for others the criteria set a path for growth over a longer term,
providing capacity to accommodate growth beyond the twenty year horizon.
� County-Level Centers Designation Process
The County and any municipality in the County that is planning to include a Metropolitan
City Center, Regional Growth Center, Countywide Center or Manufacturing / Industrial
Center within its boundaries shall specifically define the area of such center within its
comprehensive plan. The comprehensive plan shall include policies, aimed at focusing
growth within the center and along corridors consistent with the applicable criteria
contained within the Countywide Planning Policies, The County or municipality shall adopt
iregulations that reinforce the center's designation.
No more often than once every two years, the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC)
shall invite jurisdictions with centers already adopted in their comprehensive plan that seek
to be designated as centers in the Countywide Planning Policies to submit a request for
such designation. Said request shall be processed in accordance with established
procedures for amending the Countywide Planning Policies.
Each jurisdiction seeking to have a center designated in the Countywide Planning Policies
shall provide the PCRC with a report demonstrating that the proposed center meets the
minimum criteria for designation together with a statement and map describing the center,
its consistency with the applicable Countywide Planning Policies, and how adopted
regulations will serve the center.
Transit services shall be defined in the broadest sense and shall iinclude local and regional
bus service, rail where appropriate, vanpool, carpool, and other transportation demand
measures designed to reduce vehicle trips.
The minimum designation criteria to establish a candidate center by type are as follows-,
Metropolitan City Center
Area. up to 1-1/2 square miles in size;
Capital Facilities: served by sanitary sewers;
Employment- a minimum of 25 employees per gross acre of non-residential lands
with a minimum of 15,000 employees;
Population: a minimum of ten households per gross acre-- and
Transit: serve as a focal point for regional and local tranisit services.
Regional Growth Center
Area: up to 1-1/2 square miles in size;
Capital Facilities: served by sanitary sewers',
Employment: a minimum of 2,000 employees;
Population- a minimum of seven households per gross acre- and
Transit- serve as a focal point for regional and local transit services.
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County COU 7 of 210
Page 8 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S, R. Tacoma, P10
Tama, WA 98402 0
1 Countywide Center
2 Area: up to one square mile in size;
3 Capital Facilities: served by sanitary sewers;
4 Employment: a minimum of 1,000 employees;
5 Population: a minimum of 6 households per gross acre; and
6 Transit: serve as a focal point for local transit services.
7
8 Manufacturing / Industrial Center
9 Capital Facilities: served by sanitary sewers,
10 Employment: a minimum of 7,500 jobs and/or 2,000 truck trips per day, and
11 Transportation: within one mile of a state or federal highway or national rail line,
12
13 The minimum criteria report and statement shall be reviewed by the Growth Management
14 Coordinating Committee (GMCC) for consistency with Countywide Planning Policies, the
15 Transportation Coordination Committee (TCC) for consistency with transportation
16 improvements plans of WSIDOT, and with Pierce Transit's comprehensive plan, The
17 coordinating committees shall provide joint recommendation to the PCRC.
18
19 Once included in the Countywide Planning Policies, the jurisdiction where a center is
20 located may go on to seek regional designation of the center from the Puget Sound
21 Regional Council (P SRC) in accordance with its established criteria and process,
22
23 In order to be designated a Regional Growth Center the center should meet the regional
24 criteria and requirements lincluding those in VISION 2040, the regional growth, economic
25 and transportation strategy as may be amended and designated by the Puget Sound
26 Regional Council.
27
28 After county-level designation occurs within the Countywide Planning Policies and until
29 regional-level designation by the PSRC occurs the center shall be considered a
30 "candidate" Regional Growth Center.
31
32 Each jurisdiction which designates a Regional Growth Center shall establish 20-year
33 household and employment growth targets for that Center. The expected range of targets
34 will reflect the diversity of the various centers and allow communities to effectively plan for
35 needed services. The target ranges not only set a policy for the level of growth envisioned
36 for each center, but also for the timing and funding of infrastructure improvements.
37 Reaching the target ranges will require careful planning of public investment and providing
38 incentives for private investments.
39
40 Three candidate regional centers have been included into the Countywide Planning
41 Policies. One of the candidate centers is a Regional Growth Center and the other two
42 candidate centers are an Industrial/Manufacturing Center.
43
44 Candidate Regional Centers
45 University Place — Candidate Regional Growth Center
46 South Tacoma — Candidate Industrial /Manufacturing Center
47 1 Sumner-Pacific — Candidate Industrial/Manufacturing Center
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s P�erce County
RES.D Sou Page 9 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave Sl.ilo 0 8 of 210
Tacoma, WA 98402
1 Urban Growth Olutside of Centers
2
3 A variety of urban land uses and areas of growth will occur outside of designated centers
4 but within the IUGA. Local land use plans will guide the location, scale, timing, and design
5 of development within UGAs. The UGA will be where the majority of future growth and
6 development will be targeted. Development should be encouraged which complements
7 the desired focus of growth into centers and supports a multimodal transportation system.
8 For example, policies which encourage infill and revitalization of communities would help
9 to achieve the regional and statewide objectives of a compact and concentrated
10 development pattern within urban areas. The Countywide Planning Policies provide
11 guidance for development and the provision of urban services to support development
12 within the UGA.
13
14 Satellite Cities and Towns
15
16 The cities and towns in the rural areas are a significant part of Pierce County's diversity
17 and heritage. They have an important role as local trade and community centers. These
18 cities and towns are the appropriate providers of local rural services for the community.
19 They also contribute to the variety of development patterns and housing choices within the
20 county. As municipalities, these cities and towns provide urban services and are located
21 within the County's designated UGA. The urban services, residential densities and mix of
22 land uses, may differ from those of the large, contiguous portion of the UGA in Pierce
23 County.
24
25
26
27 UGA-1. The County shall designate the countywide urban growth area and Potential
28 Annexation Areas within it, in consultations between the County and each
29 municipality.
30
31 1.1 County referral of proposed urban growth area and Potential Annexation
32 Area designations to the Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC).
33
34 1.1.1 The PCRC may refer the proposed designations to the Growth
35 Management Coordinating Committee (GIVICC), or its successor
36 entity for technical advice and for a report.
37
38 1.1,2 The PCRC may conduct public meetings to review the proposed
39 designation and, at such meetings, may accept oral: or written
40 comments and communications from the public.
41
42 1.1.3 At the conclusion of its review and analysis, the PCRC shall make
43 a recommendation to the County and to the municipalities in the
44 County.
45
46 1.2 Once adopted by the County, the urban growth area and Potential
47 Annexation Area(s) designations shall not be changed except in
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County Courp 9 of 210
Page 10 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S, F m ,bID
Tacoma, WA 98402
1 accordance with the Countywide Policy on "Amendments and
2 Transition."
3
4 1.2.1 A jurisdiction shall not be required to modify existing urban growth
5 area boundaries or Potential Annexation Areas in order to reduce
6 the residential or employment capacity to conform to adopted
7 growth targets reflecting VISION 2040's Regional Growth Strategy.
8 Jurisdictions shall, however, consider the adopted growth targets
9 when updating their local comprehensive plans.
10
11 1.2.2, Growth targets are the minimum number of residents, housing
12 units, orjobs a given jurisdiction is planning to accommodate
13 within the appropriate planning horizon and are to be developed
14 through a collaborative countywide process that ensures all
15 jurisdictions are accommodating a fair share of growth. These
16 targets are informational tools integrated into local land use plans
17 to assist in formulating future residential and employment land
18 needs.
19
20 UGA-2. The following specific factors and criteria shall dictate the size and boundaries
21 of urban growth areas:
22
23 2.1 Size
24
25 2.1.1 Urban growth areas must be of suffiicient size to accommodate the
26 urban growth projected to occur over the succeeding 20-year
27 planning period taking into account the following:
28 a. land with natural constraints, such as critical areas
29 (environmentally- sensitive land);
30 b. agricultural land to be preserved;
31 c. greenbelts and open space;
32 d. New Fully Contained Communities pursuant to RCVV §
33 3670A.350;
34 e. maintaining a supply of developable land sufficient to allow
35 market forces to operate and precluding the possibility of a
36 land monopoly but no more than is absolutely essential to
37 achieve the above purpose;
38 f. existing projects with development potential at various stages
39 of the approval or permitting process (i.e., the "pipeline");
40 g. land use patterns created by subdivisions, short plats or large
41 lot divisions;
42 h. build-out of existing development and areas which are
43 currently only partially built out;
44 i. follow existing parcel boundary lines.
45
46 21.2 The County, and each municipality in the County, shall
47 cooperatively develop and propose objective standards and criteria
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County C our
930 Tacoma Ave S, Fp
Page 11 of 15 .1 IV 0 of 210
P
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
to disaggregate the State Office of Financial Management's
Countywide growth forecasts and VISION 2040 Regional Growth
Strategy forecasts for the allocation of projected population to the
County and municipalities, taking into account the availability and
concurrency of public facilities and services with the impact of
development, as well as the VISION 2040 Regional Growth
Strategy.
2.1.3 The County shall use a consistent countywide targeting process for
allocating population and employment growth consistent with the
regional vision, including establishing:
a. local employment targets,
b. local housing targets based on population projections, and
c. local housing and employment targets for each designated
regional growth center.
2,.2 Boundaries
2.2.1 The following shall be considered in determining the location of
urban growth area boundaries:
a. geographic, topographic, and manmade features;
b. public facility and service availability, limits and extensions,
c. jurisdictional boundaries including special improvement
districts;
dl. location of designated natural resource lands and critical
areas,
e. avoidance of unserviceable iislands of County land surrounded
by other jurisdictional entities;
f destination 20310 urban/rural line and PSCAA burn ban line.
Phasing of Development within the Urban Growth Area
2.3 The County and each municipality in the County shall seek to direct
growth as follows:
a. first to cities and towns, centers and urbanized areas with existing
infrastructure capacity;
b. second to areas that are already urbanized such that infrastructure
improvements can be easily extended; and
C. last to areas requiring major infrastructure improvements.
2,31 Capital facilities plans shall identify existing, planned, and future
infrastructure needs within Urban Growth Areas.
2.3.2 The County and each municipality in the County should identify
appropriate levels of service and concurrency standards that
address schools, sewer, water, and parks,
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No, 2014-17s Pierce County CouTplo 1 of 210
Page 12 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S, m
Tacoma, WA 88402
1
2.3.3 The County and each municipality in the County shall identify
2
appropriate levels of service and multimodal concurrency
3
standards that address roads.
4
5
2.4
The urban growth area in unincorporated portions of the County shall be
6
limited to the following:
7
8
2.4.1 build-out of existing partially developed areas with urban services;
9
2.4.2 new fully contained communities;
10
2.4.3 redevelopment corridors,
11
12
2,5
The County's urban growth area may be extended to allow for build-out
13
of newly developed areas only if development capacity within Potential'
14
Annexation Areas and growth in the areas identified in Policy 2.4 is
15
determined to be inadequate to meet total population and employment
16
projections consistent with the other policies set forth herein.
17
18
2.6
Encourage efficient use of urban land by maximizing the development
19
potential of existing urban lands, such as advancing development that
20
achieves zoned density.
21
22
2.7
The urban growth area in existence prior to the adoption of VISION 2040
23
may contain capacity beyond that needed to accommodate the growth
24
target per regional geography for the succeeding 20-year planning period
25
based upon existing zoning designations, allowed density, existing land
26
division patterns, and similar factors. It is permissible for such areas to
27
continue to be designated as urban growth areas. Expansion of these
28
urban growth area boundaries is acknowledged to be inconsistent with
29
the CPPs and strongly discouraged if the urban growth area expansion is
30
not in accordance, with policy AT-2.3.
31
32
UGA-3.
Potential
annexation areas shall be designated through the Pierce County
33
Comprehensive
Plan in consultation with cities and towns,
34
35
11
A city or town shall first identify a Potential Annexation Area(s) within its
36
respective Comprehensive Plan;
37
38
3.2
Potential Annexation Area boundaries shall be determined with
39
consideration for the following additional factors;
40
41
3.2.1 the VISION 2040 document, including Multicounty Planning
42
Policies;
43
3.2,2 the Carrying capacity of the land considering natural resources,
44
agricultural land and environmentally - sensitive lands;
45
3.2.3 population, housing, and employment projections;
46
3.2.4 financial capabilities and urban services capacities;
RES.D
Ex
Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County cOu of 210
Tacoma S,
Page 13 of 15 930 Ave , R 1r,002
Tacoma, WA 98402
1 3.2.5 consistency and compatibility with neighborhood, local and
2 regional plans,
3 3.2.6 the existing land use and subdivision pattern;
4 12.7 property access and ownership.
5
6 3.3 Potential Annexation Areas should not overlap or leave unincorporated
7 urban islands between cities and towns.
8
9 3.3.1 Future requests to establish a new Potential Annexation Area shall
10 not result in an overlap with an existing Potential Annexation Area
11 or create islands between cities and towns.
12 3.3.2 Cities and towns with existing Potential Annexation Area overlaps
13 should work toward resolving the existing overlaps.
14
15 3.4 The urban service areas and satellite urban growth areas as designated
16 through the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan as of June 30, 2013
17 shall be recognized as designated Potential Annexation Areas.
18
19 3.4.1 Urban service area designations approved by the Pierce County
20 Council through its 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Cycle
21 shall be recognized as a Potential Annexation Area,
22 3.4.2 Boundaries of the Potential Annexation Areas should not split
23 parcels. Efforts should be put forth to resolve split parcels prior to
24 the initial designation of Potential Annexation Areas,
25
26 Annexation within the Urban Growth Area
27
28 UGA-4. Pierce County, in conjunction with its cities and towns, shall establish a
29 strategy for future annexations within the urban growth area,
30
31 41 Annexation is preferred over incorporation within the urban growth area,
32
33 4.2 The Potential Annexation Areas as identified in the Pierce County
34 Comprehensive Plan shall be the foundation to an annexation strategy.
35
36 4.2.1 Cities and towns are allowed to annex territory only within their
37 adopted Potential Annexation Area as identified in the Pierce
38 County Comprehensive Plan.
39 4.2.2 Annexation of an area should be phased to coincide with a city or
40 town's ability to coordinate the provision of a full range of urban
41 services to the areas proposed for annexation.
42
43 4.3 The County and its cities and towns should proactively coordinate, the
44 annexation of unincorporated areas within the urban growth area that are
45 within each respective city or town's Potential Annexation Area,
46
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Paerce County 3 of 210
930 Tacoma Ave �Cllu Ip
Page 14 of 15 � I�m 1110 qV
Tacoma, VVA 98402
1
4.3.1
The County and each city and town should work towards the
2
establishment of annexation plans and joint planning agreements,
3
with an exception for lands associated with Joint Base Lewis
4
McChord and Camp Murray.
5
6
4.3.1.1 A joint planning agreement is to serve as a mechanism
7
where the County or a city can, prior to notice of
8
annexation, identify potential objections and resolutions.
9
431.2 An annexation plan should identify a potential schedule
10
for annexation of areas with a city or town,
11
12
4.3.2
The County should explore and implement financial' incentives for
13
a city or town to annex areas associated with its respective
14
Potential Annexation Area,
15
16
4.3.2.1 Financial incentives may include the establishment of a
17
County level grant fund to assist in financial challenges a
18
city or town may have in annexing an area.
19
432.2 Financial incentives may include the elimination or
20
reduction in a fee associated with a County service to a
21
city or town in exchange for annexing an area.
22
23
4.3. 3
The County, and cities and towns, should explore potential
24
partnerships in grant funding opportunities to overcome obstacles
25
associated with annexing specific areas,
26
27
43.4
Cities and towns should recognize the financial impacts
28
experienced by the County when annexation only encompasses
29
commercial or greenfield areas and avoids existing residential
30
development.
31
32
43.4.1 Cities and towns are encouraged to include a mix of
33
existing commercial), residential, and greenfield areas,
34
where appropriate, in future annexation proposals.
35
36
4.4 The County should prioritize the adopted Potential Annexation Areas for
37
annexation.
38
39
4.4.1
The County's highest priority should be Potential Annexation Areas
40
representing unincorporated "'islands" between cities and towns;
41
and,
42
4.4.2
The County shall support annexation for areas in which a joint
43
planning agreement exists between the County and appropriate
44
city or town.
45
46 Note: The policy numbersIcitations for all policies that follow will need to be
47 changed.
RES.D Exhibit A to Ordinance No, 2014-17s Pierce County C `m` 4 of 210
Page 15 of 15 930 Tacoma Ave S, r�,Vp
Tacoma, WA 98402
I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2014-17s
This agreement is entered into by and among the cities and towns of Pierce County and
Pierce County. This agreement is made pursuant to the provisions of the Interlocal
Cooperation Act of 1967, Chapter 39.34 RC'V'S`. This agreement has been authorized by
the legislative body of each jurisdiction pursuant to formal action and evidenced by
execution of the signature page of this agreement.
IWO
_ UAN Fgftj
A. The Pierce County Regional' Council (PCRC)1 was created in 1992 by interlocal
agreement among the cities and' towns of Pierce Couinty and Pierce County, The
organization is charged with responsibilities including: Serving as a local link to
the Puget Sound Regional Council, promoting intergovernmental cooperation,
facilitating, compliance with the coordination and consistency requirements of the
Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCVV) and the Reglional
Transportation Planning Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing a
consensus among jurisdictions regarding the development and modification of
the Countywide Planning Policies,
B. The Pierce County Couintywide Planning Policies provide for amendments to be
adopted through amendment of the original interlocalagreement, or by a anew
interlocall agreement. The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies may be
amended upon the adoption of amendments by the Pierce County Council and
ratification by 60 percent of the jurisdictions in Pierce County representing 75
percent of the total Pierce County population as designated by the State Office of
Financial Management at the time of the proposed ratification,.
C. A demonstration of ratification shall be by execution of an initerlocal agreement or
the absence of a legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment.
D. A jurisdiction shall be deemed as casting an affirmative vote if it has not taken
legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment within 180 days from the
date the Pierce County Council formally authorizes the Pierce County Executive
to enter into an interlocall agreement.
E. The amendment incorporates anew policies intended to provide a more
coordinated annexation strategy for unincorporated urban areas adjacent to cities
and towns.
F The Pierce County Regional Council recommended adoption of the proposed
amendment on October 17, 2013.
RES.D
Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce Count C
Page 1 of 3 930 Tacoma A7SI0r'U FIND5 of 210
Tacoma, WA 98402
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Mofflarems
This agreement is entered into by the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce
County for the purpose of ratifying and approving the attached amendment to the Pierce
County Countywide Planning Policies (Attachment).
xxft"�
This agreement shall become effective upon execution by 60 percent of the jurisdictions
in Pierce County, representing 75 percent of the total Pierce County population as
designated by the State Office of Financial Management at the time of the proposed
ratification. This agreement will remain in effect until subsequently amended or repealed
as provided by the Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies.
SEVERABILITY:
If any of the provisions of this agreement are held illegal, invalid, or unenforceable, the
remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
FILING-
A copy of this agreement shall be filed with the Secretary of State, Washington
Department of Commerce, the Pierce County Auditor, and each city and town clerk,
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by each member
jurisdiction as evidenced by the signature page affixed to this agreement.
�Exhibit B to Ordinance No, 2014-17s Pierce County S; COU
RES.D
Page 2 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave , Im lr4O 6 of 210
Tacoma, WA 98402 q0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
INTERLOC►L AGREEMENT
1 0 �
Signature Page
The legislative body of the undersigned jurisdiction has authorized execution of
the Interlocal Agreement, Amendments, to the Pierce County Countywide Planning
Policies.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF
This agreement has been executed by
BY:
DATE:
Approved:
BY':
(Name of City/Town/County)
(Mayo r/Executive)
(Director/Manager/Chair of County Council)
Approved as to Form:
EN
Approved:
A UV
(City Attorney/Prosecutor)
(Pierce County Executive)
RES.D Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County Counebj&7 of 210
Page 3 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1
Tacoma, WA 90402
1
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2014-17s
2
3
FINDINGS OF FACT
4
5
The Pierce County Council finds that:
6
7
1.
The Pierce County Regional Council (PCRC) was created' in 1992 by interlocal
8
agreement among the cities and towns of Pierce County and Pierce County
9
Government (the County), and charged with responsibilities, including: Serving as a
10
local link to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC),, promoting intergovernmental
11
cooperation, facilitating compliance with the coordination and consistency
12
requirements of the Growth Management Act [GMA] (Chapter 36.70A RCW) and the
13
Regional Transportation Planning Organization (Chapter 47.80 RCW), and developing
14
a consensus among jurisdictions regarding the development and modification of the
15
Countywide Planning Policies.
16
17
2.
The GMA required the County to adopt a countywide planning policy in cooperation
18
with the cities and towns located within Pierce County.
19
20
3.
The Countywide Planning Policies are to be used for establishing a countywide
21
framework from which the comprehensive plans for Pierce County and the cities and
22
towns within Pierce County are developed and adopted.
23
24
4,
On June 30, 1992, the Pierce County Council passed Ordinance No, 92-74 adopting
25
the initial Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies.
26
27
5.
The GMA requires the central Puget Sound region to adopt multi-county planning
28
policies.
29
30
6.
The PSRC membership is comprised of central Puget Sound counties (King, Pierce,
31
Snohomish, and Kitsap), cities and towns, ports, tribes, and transit agencies.
32
33
7.
The PSRC is the regional authority to adopt multi-county planning policies.
34
35
8.
The PSRC adopted VISION 2040 at its May 2008 General Assembly meeting.
36
37
9.
VISION 2040 is the central Puget Sound region's multi-county planning policies,
38
39
10.
VISION 2040 "assumes that by 2040 all of the urban area will be within municipalities
40
and the unincorporated urban growth area will be a thing of the past."
41
42
11.
VISION 2040 "calls for joint city-county planning , including establishing common
43
standards for development review and permitting, as well as for services and
44
infrastructure, to ensure that development is efficient and compatible with adjacent
45
communities."
46
47
12.
VISION 2040 contains a goal that envisions "all unincorporated lands within the urban
48
growth area will either annex into existing cities or incorporate as new cities."
49
50
13.
VISION 2040 policy MPP-DP-1 8 calls for the County to "affiliate all urban
51
unincorporated lands appropriate for annexation with an adjacent city or identify those
52
that may be more feasible for incorporation."
RES.D
Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County COu of 210
930 "Tacoma Ave S, Rm
Page 1 of 3 , 1f,0q08
Tacoma, WA 96402
1
2
14,
VISION 2040 policy MPP-DP-19 states to "support joint planning between cities and
3
counties to work cooperatively in planning for urban unincorporated areas to ensure an
4
orderly transition to city governance
5
6
15.
VISION 2040 policy MPP-DP-20 states to "support the provision and coordination of
7
urban services to unincorporated urban areas by the adjacent city or, where
8
appropriate, by the county as an interim approach."
9
10
16,
The PCRC directed the Growth Management Coordinating Committee (GM'CC) to
11
recommend policies addressing annexation.
12
13
17.
The GMCC recommended new policies intended to provide a more coordinated
14
annexation strategy for unincorporated urban areas adjacent to cities and towns.
15
16
18.
The PCRC, based upon the recommendation from the GMCC, and its own
17
discussions, recommended approval of the proposal at its October 17, 2013 meeting.
18
19
19.
The Pierce County Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposal at its
20
November 26, 2013 meeting,
21
22
20,
The Pierce County Planning Commission recommendation to approve the proposal
23
was unanimous,
24
25
21,
The Pierce County Environmental Official has determined the proposal is exempt from
26
SEPA per WAC 197 -11- 800(19),
27
28
22.
The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies include provisions addressing
29
procedures for amending the Countywide Planning Policies.
30
31
23.
The Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies require amendments to the
32
Countywide Planning Policies to be adopted through an amendment of the original
33
Interlocal Agreement or by a new interlocal agreement. The amendment will become
34
effective when 60 percent of the cities, towns, and the County, representing 75 percent
35
of the total population as designated by the State Office of Financial Management at
36
the time of the proposed ratification become signatories to the agreement.
37
38
24.
A demonstration of ratification shall be by execution of an interlocal agreement or the
39
absence of a legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment.
40
41
25.
A jurisdiction shall be deemed as casting an affirmative vote if it has snot taken
42
legislative action to disapprove a proposed amendment within 180 days from the date
43
the Pierce County Council formally authorizes the Pierce County Executive to enter
44
into an interlocal agreement.
45
46
26,
The Community Development Committee of the County Council, after a properly
47
noticed public hearing, considered oral and written testimony, and forwarded its
48
recommendation to the full Council.
49
50
27,
The County Council held a public hearing on June 24, 2014, where oral and written
51
testimony was considered.
52
RES.D Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 2014-17s Pierce County 9 of 210
93OTarornaAveS, OU'r
, C'
Page 2 of 3 R, 1 10
Tacoma WA 98402 90
3
4
6
7
8
9
10
RES.D
28, It is in support of the amendment for providing consistency between the Pierce
Countywide Planning Policies and VISION 2040.
29. A subsequent ordinance of the County Council shall be necessary to acknowledge the
ratification process and amend Section 19D.240 PCC, "Pierce County Countywide
Planning Policies".
30, It is in the public iinterest to authorize the Pierce County Executive to execute the
interlocal agreements,
Exhibit C to Ordinance No, 2014-175 Rerce County Co'
" 0 of 210
Page 3 of 3 930 Tacoma Ave 8, IM P40
Tacoma, WA 98402 0
'Alu,BURN
VVAS I � I N G "i'(') N1
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5107
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Date:
September 30, 2014
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council to adopt Resolution No. 5107.
Background Summary:
For a number of years, current and previous Mayors, Auburn City Council and staff
have studied and planned for a community center at Les Gove Community Campus to
serve the citizens of the City of Auburn. More recently, the City had conducted
planning and design for a community center along 12th Street at Les Gove
Community Campus and had constructed an Activity Center building on the north end
of the Campus adjacent to the Parks and Recreation Administration Building (PRAB).
Presently, the City has accumulated $9 million for the construction of a center
comprised of a $3 million appropriation from the Washington State Legislature and $6
million in City funds. In March 2014, the Auburn City Council decided to not proceed
with construction bidding for the Les Gove Community Center along 12th Street
because of anticipated construction costs that exceeded the maximum $9 million
dollar budget.
Subsequent to the Council's March, 2014 decision, Mayor Backus and City staff
reviewed potential options for the commitment and use of the $9 million maximum
budget. From this effort, Mayor Backus proposed a Youth Center and Community
Center option comprised of remodeling the existing Parks, Arts and Recreation offices
into a Youth Center and developing an adjacent Community Center. At this time,
Mayor Backus advised the City Council that the proposed Youth Center and
Community Center could be designed, constructed and furnished within the $9 million
maximum budget through pragmatic decision - making on design features and
materials, and economies of scale and by colocation of services, functions and assets.
On August 18, 2014, the Auburn City Council passed Resolution No. 5091 concurring
RES.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 141 of 210
with the Mayor's proposal for a Youth Center and Community Center and with the
design, construction and furnishing of said Centers within the $9 million maximum
budget.
Since the Council's action on August 18th, the Mayor and City staff have worked to
identify a qualified architectural firm that could: 1) demonstrate the design and
construction experience needed for the Youth Center and Community Center; 2)
assemble a highly qualified team of firms representing the different specialties needed
for the design and construction of the Youth Center and Community Center; and 3) be
able to establish effective working relationships with the Mayor, City Council,
community and City staff. The Mayor and City staff have identified ARC Architects as
the preferred provider for the provision of professional architectural and engineering
services based on its and its assembled team's demonstrated experience in design
and construction services for similar projects.
ARC Architects has been in business since 1976, offers a diversity of services and
has worked on a number of community center projects including most recently the
Rosehill Community Center in Mukilteo, WA and Rainier Beach Community Center
and Pool in Seattle, WA. ARC Architects has worked with the City previously on public
engagement issues at Les Gove Community Campus, and was a previous finalist for
the provision of services for the most recent community center design and
construction services effort. ARC Architects has assembled a diverse team of firms to
assist it in the provision of design and construction services for the Youth Center and
Community Center. This team includes KPFF Engineers, Inc. for structural
engineering and civil engineering, FSi Consulting Engineers for mechanical and
plumbing, Travis Fitzmaurice & Associates for electrical engineering, Swift Company
for landscape architecture, Clevenger Associates for food service, SSA Acoustics for
acoustic and audio /visual design, DCW Cost Management for cost estimating, Heffron
Transportation for traffic analysis and parking analysis and Fermata Consulting for
sustainable design. Fermata Consulting's assistance is needed in part because the
project is required to obtain Leadership in Energy Efficiency & Design (LEED) Silver
certification as a condition of the State's $3 million appropriation.
The Les Gove Community Campus Committee met on October 1, 2014 to review and
discuss with the Mayor, City staff and ARC Architects, Resolution No. 5107 and its
exhibits. At the conclusion of its discussion, the Committee voted 3 -0 on motion action
to recommend to the full City Council the approval of Resolution No. 5107.
Exhibits:
Exhibit 1: Statement of Qualifications for ARC Architects
Exhibit 2: Task Work Summary
RES.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 142 of 210
Exhibit 3: Consultant Team List
Exhibit 4: Updated Project Schedule based on ARC Team input
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Les Gove Community Campus Other: Mayor's Office, CDPW, City Attorney, Parks &
Rec
Councilmember: Wagner Staff: Snyder
Meeting Date: October 6, 2014 Item Number: RES.E
RES.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 143 of 210
RESOLUTION NO. 5 1 0 7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
NEGOTIATE AND EXECUTE A PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH ARC ARCHITECTS FOR
ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
THE YOUTH CENTER AND COMMUNITY CENTER AT
LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS
WHEREAS, the current Auburn City Council and previous Councils have studied
and planned for a Community Center to serve the citizens of the City of Auburn; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has received a three million dollar state
appropriation to be used for anew Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has added an additional six million dollars in
budgeted funds for the construction of a Community Center; and
WHEREAS, in March 2014, the Auburn City Council decided to not proceed with
construction bidding for the Les Gove Community Center at that time because
estimated costs exceeded the budgeted nine million dollar; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the Council's March, 2014, decision, the Mayor and
staff reviewed potential options for commitment and use of the nine million dollar
budget; and
WHEREAS, as an alternative to the previous plans, the Mayor proposed a Youth
Center and Community Center option comprised of remodeling the existing Parks, Arts
and Recreation offices into a Youth/Teen Center and developing an adjacent
Community Center; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor advised the City Council that the proposed Youth Teen
Center and Community Center could be designed, constructed and furnished within the
nine million dollar maximum budget through pragmatic decision- making on design
features and materials, and economies of scale, by colocation of services, functions and
assets; and
Resolution No. 5107
September 26, 2014
Page 1
RES.E Page 144 of 210
WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council passed Resolution No. 5091 on August 18,
2014, concurring with the Mayor's proposal for a Youth Center and Community Center
and with the design, construction and furnishing of said Centers within the nine million
dollar maximum budget; and,
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City staff have identified ARC Architects as the
preferred provider for the provision of professional architectural and engineering
services based on its and its assembled team's demonstrated experience in design and
construction services for similar projects; and,
WHEREAS, on October 1, 2014, the Les Gove Community Campus Committee
recommended on motion action to the full City Council the approval of a professional
services agreement with ARC Architects for the provision of professional architectural
and engineering services for the Youth Center and Community Center at Les Gove
Community Campus.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Execution of Professional Services A regiment. The Mayor is
hereby authorized to negotiate and execute a professional services agreement with
ARC Architects for professional architectural and engineering services for the Youth
Center and Community Center at Les Gove Community Campus.
Section-2. Administrative Procedures. The Mayor is hereby authorized to
implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to implement the
directive of this legislation.
Section 3. Effective Date. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon
passage and signatures hereon.
SIGNED and DATED this day of , 2014
CITY OF AUBURN
NANCY BACKUS, Mayor
Resolution No. 5107
September 26, 2014
Page 2
RES.E Page 145 of 210
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
iel B. Heid, City
Resolution No. 5107
September 26, 2014
Page 3
RES.E Page 146 of 210
a rc
ARCHITECTS
1101 EAST PIKE ST
SEATTLE,WA 98122
www.arcarchitects.mm
-- `
, f;W.
�k .r�
�.-'�� .JIIV�.` "'1: - - - .;,�.re �.�
�� �fi�; �i i� - - .,a.�" .
...r,3
Y , -�
,�' � _ �I '� i ' �{I'.
F, �
r1yy�' ��.I� � .e � I ' �I ' I = �'�
�f . ` �i ° I
f
PLAN N I NG EDt��ITI:ON ADM1
Ilw.. _ - � - r,,��
1�ti�!
, 'I f��.
ti ,�.
_�-- .
� �"° ��.�.� .� � -
1.' - � Y.�, �1 .
I �
�
!
� k� . :._ �� : Pt ��` ' � �'
� ` -11E+ _ � _�
�;.. �� i.. � I " �_ ^ ,:C: io
� i:. � �:��� ,�„ u �-� - - -
�
MRSC ROSTERS
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
AUGUST 2013
a r c = ° � - = _� , � T- ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Architecture General Categories �
Feaslbility, facill[ies piannlnq ,&site planning ?
Building condition assessmenl 3
ADA consul[ing&design 4
His[oric pr252rvaCion 5
LEED consul�inu € s�rtainahle deslgn 6
Public Facilities Service Categories 7
Dlnlnq hall&'ood s2rvice 8
Pire sta[ion design & planninc� - Ilbrary deslgn 8
Fecreation&gymnasiums-swimmingpools 9
Theater& performance 9
F��oject exampl25 1U-16
Administration Service Categories 17
Int�riord�s+gn-oftieabwldings spaceplanning 18
Projeci exampla� 19-22
Medical&Laboratory Service Categories 23
Medical eenters�� laboraiory design-dental oFtice� 24
Pr�ieetex�mples 25 23
Education Service Categories 29
Chlldcare facllltle� da„rooms&lecwre halls 30
Hlqher education -Paculry K staff oFfices 30
Pioje�-�e�edi��F'�les 31-36
Housing Service Categories 37
�Via�;!-crplanni�q - m�fCi�Yai�ilyhouslnri 30
Pn�eet esarnple; 39-4�1
References 46 47
Project Manager and Personnel Qualifications ti0 57
Management ;9
-�ouc&6�����ae[�Na�?a�_i-�ma�n�. ��0
Project Management nl
RES.E Page 148 of 210
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS
CTURE GENERAL CATEGORIES �
, � a�ning �
' ar�ning
sm�ents
n �gn
- �
� � '
� �
- I: �
_
i ; , I � _
�_ � f� I
�
� ;�-` _ 1��
. �`: - �� � _ � ,
a � '�` ��� �f� �, �', �� � � � ���,
I ���� ' ;�
� ► : ,: i: �
_ �i � ,�,_
II �I � �� i��l�.
� I �
�i�
- ,...�� �. - � l = � , -�
�� -�
' ;� "'��, �� � � I
� �
� `, � �- -
� � ���� ;_'"L:ti` '� ��� i -
'� �� ��'� i = 1
_ _ 1 � � ! � —
I� � ?
; ; �,.
� ,
1
; �
�:.. 11 � � , - �_
� �
,�� :
a
'mew.... -ne P ' � • 0
��ry'
ARCHITECTUREGENERAL
FEASIBILITY, FACILITIES PLANNING, & SITE PLANNING
�—�- ---- ,,.. � ,��, �� _ . ,�, , � ,�,�,�,; � � _ ���_ � ,��e�, ,ue�,�;,
-- ,��,�. n.: .. ...��;Gr 1 C '1PUl.d�i .f1..00P•4,9 t7'lu 0'S Ica l ,1�-Z5.'O' t3f`1L��2.
:�n���nq, senvir,e areas, dlmate, [opograG'.�Y, connectivny. an,^', ,nfraslruc,ure. Tn�s
� - �nfonnatio�allows ARC antl its team ro provide:awc'�;y&fest-fi[study for faciGties and/
.ygr.�'� � ��.�c; PI�3nn�no '�eveiesir�3i�n� �sP�ov�de�1 ��'�eio ,v��hdecson-makog �tiiqhi��ghts
r � ��:��,�,G;-�,�,��� ����.nr�.�,� ������„�.,��
f
,� INVENTORY AND PROGRAMMING
�� .,,I ;..�:;. .�. .
� ' � � �. ,���t;�� r 3�ar,ri���..��zrounae�s�ane�s �es[hatm�y
sy�,K �� � -�e rhe plann g. �n, ,� „�.. sce a ] a�-��.� p�a� n�.og,we look for onsrraina and
� ,::r;�„n�ues fo� ihe srce. f m�luple vtes a e�onsidered,we will produce - with dien[
- � � ...,:-a weighted evaluation o(sites co be able co objeccively presenc che besc s�[e. Key
sr,Ke holderz are interviewed in o�der to undeacar.d and definz the prou�aT� fa the
�s ' �.� :��.i,iv or sne. Depend�ng on prolec[needs,we faah[a[e pablic meenngs wrth guidance
rc,m our dlerns and o[her s[akeholders. in addi6on ro In[ervicws and pubGc InpuC we
��r� ot;en have consultanls who provide demographic, marke[ anzlysis and cost recovery
�.��, . anaiy�es�u help deveiou[he pr�i�ram and budget.
`�. � .. .�,;:.; ,_.
��.
' �`�� � � - "'' DESIGN CONCEPTS AND COST ESTIMATES
�,�'�_ � � � ���,�-���' Jd� develo�� �on�e�t oi tions h i iddre t budding funcCon and si[e relationships Por
�� ,� q^��1�� _ new bwlii�qt �ui s� � ��a�n�ng we will evaluate Che options based functionaliry site/
� � �z` urban aesgn at[r�bute�, roning, archlte�[ura� s[rength, solar onentacon, conne�nwty
f'�`�9 a y i
' � �- W '�� n� 7 t9, (auto, bus, Pedesuian, Glkel, environmental benefit or cost, impacts�n nelghbors, and
" d :� cost�s. These are prrsented[o dients for lheir mput.Publlc meeungs may also be required.
�� � + �+� r� �' At [he planning levei, we ',ypicdlly use square foo[ cosls fo' buildinq consUUCUOn
, ��` �w estiina[es, provided by z lhlyd parCy estima[or. The escima[es are Informed by basis of
�a�`�• des�gns provlded by the deslyn �eam, so lha� rhey a�e grounded In a panialar level of
;. �m ti � I quality. Site developmen�cos[5�re based on tl�e paroculars o`eadi ste, for example,
vvprkmc7 mriih lopuyraphy,uiili�y�oc�uon,and zoning req�lrerrients.
� RECOMMENDATION AND FINAL REPORT
. � ��'` Ap�ei�=�r����ialie^�nuvecontepiwlliofirn�ieiurtherdevelopeduasedondientanclpubllc
'nv°�+ ��np�.r,. R����:er�.�,_�s an�I ;��I���rsentaUOnS are produced,depending on projec[needs.The
�`�� r -- m i� � o��i� , ,� cmi �; upcl�tetl. Al �his point, we often shiq to a quanut'y take-
�'� ' �`�-�� uH esnrnjre. A 1 afr .in�l final �eport aie revlewed and reE^ed based on dlent and
* P'
_„�.. Nn.t;�A-.' t �. 3k�hi� �z� i� i �
` _ �.
- Select Sample Projects
Ashwood Commun��.ry Cen[er and Affordable No�smg N1 as�,e� �I�i
� � Bellevue Schools&Parks S[udv
� � � Lake Citv Librarv Renovanon and Addt�on,Seatce.�VA
\
, . � � I.onqviewConlerenceandCommuniry�enier
�--_ -- �...,�TJ�eoCiryHall&CommunityCenrerFeasibiliry5rutly
. -olly Neighborhood Campus,Seaitle.WA
�� � � '�-� <:[sapReglonalEventCenterMas[erPlan
�.�-- I '� � �- �.u�d City Ha�l Programming
�-- ' • — � ' . �����dm�shGryHall&POfi[e&ParksMasier�'�a��
�%� � �:,a��m�eCoin��wni!v&AquaticCente�Stuo:
. ,:.i..,. _r .: � ..,, .. ..
RE�.�` Page 150 of 210
�����chir. cr���� �r��,=�.a�� ���� Fr���o�� ,��;v��- _„ a .y � r�osrER
- — _.._.. -
au,�,sTZO�3
' `m�°"'""°•"°�"""`°°° gUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENTS
i v.,�, . ..,.
���.,,�.._ — �� �, � � -.. �� �. �,�._ �� . �, � �,: � .�. ���,� _._�,�
,__�� ,� .
— wn .i'i. _ �-� ., i�. �.._i'1 . _-°l 9 'l.;]"�1 ,. A, dt ..I.O'1
— �.n,..s�.e.
_���..� -. .,
_ — J _ . —, I�. l :,.'i�l .s ..r"1c��1: J �: '1:.. �. T:, . �.. ,�C.T._OZfl��el
_ 'a el�°c' i� �.syz�ems, �iu=r,suee,nnd����snc5.
I,;�,,,,, ---
: i
--;i,,,��,`.,,�„`r, „„� APPROACHTOASSESSMENTS
�r����
_�-- ��...�
�--.�.-- ArChiteCtUre: [od2 s uP i,e�s�.bill.e �i1 de:� j ope�aiional �pqracles o�esi5�inq
�� conrin.o�_ a e evawaied. Architecwral cha���s reuuireo by the work ol consulWnts
k T�w `
, , _.__ R�,' �t nror��ace,-l�ntheassessments. Marnriakand5rizhesarPmviewedandchangesar2
��- ,,, c000sed o❑iv ir[hey represen[money weli spe�c.
��.',:.'�_ "" ,,,, Ernelope�. Depend�ngonscopethebi.�id�ngenve�opekevaluated�ormoisture,vapor
,. ;. - ° .3^d a�r�nfilrration,and a report of[^e ex[eno� walls and roof condition is provided.
_ ; �<." �°" � °'"' ,.,ra, �nia,�e�e Invesrqa,�on; ar�� �i �� i-�,; N,_,;a�ed by ARC and envelope and
'�IrUClUrdl��ilSUl��]nCS,il dD{Jrppndlr'_
Plumbing,HVAC,Fire Alarm,and Electrical Systems�. The,e systems are inventoriecl
for exmmq comtitlons and equlpm� � �n.-i npe n�ny par,ir�eters in order [o frame
- p� nosed svsiems 'm�rovements. Lii� ,.�.;z����" o�;he eyuipment is considered as
�' �-a w�u a�e�e.gy savings po[entials of new eqwomen[or convols.
�� � � - � � Structure he scructure �s evaluated for Rs o.�rre�t cond��non and �megd!v. w�irh
. . ._. .-,.. �.�. ,, .. - . .�. � , .:... ., . ,,..
'G,,� �, . . , . - . -
���� �,
'�=-- � � CQMMC47CIFlLPFOPER7'(-CITYOFSEATTLC
'� . ,^�.ci '�,._ �.� '� I '�.li�-:,. i u _�� �,
�n�l��.h�n� ikaaquan iir�s5.iiy �15_aClebui�diny Iea52dh�nUnpiofite dc�
" �� �.. ., d i�.hrer eRnuna fire s[aun� ihctii assessmei ts r�cluded idPntilyin9 exis,u-� �.
�f' ��'- �ortcommgs and pr;onured and esnmz,ed [ne costs co address the shormr��n:�.
. � � � � `''� "'�ey inciuded revtew of archirecwre and buld�ng systems. and energv. ADA jn��.
� ,uuaural codes. The approach was an-��nteqra[ed process wi[h the dien�and de;.����
�.��.� _ _ . . . �
�,��,m with the final report inc�uding a series of recommendations,costs,and[imeline
-� � �n��iant Proiects�. Green Lake Cominunity Center and Evanti Ppol, Hiawat�.�.
Iu.,,.F.� ,�mmunl.ry Center, Queen Anne CommuNry Centei, lefferson Communiry Ceni��
, �— ��:r�i Helyhts Communiry Cen�er, Northiwest Senior Center, South Park P���-
� ('_ I_' " r' - Jeve!oo�-�ea; Conm,ttee, Tzrn Pa'enl Hane ,
�—� � .,..<n,�, ��., .�a;o�''rogao� -�� c�o.,:fz . .
� � i-�l�'� - _
. ,
� �'M � GEyIDENTIAL PROPERTY -VASHON HOUSEHOLD
�
� ,��,� :� t�e non-profit housing group,Vaslron hous�r ,u .. _�� „ �^.F:�, i �;�•.-
!— ��.eels assessmenr for an older HUD 202 senlor ho�vng pro�ect and a more re�e�r�..
� � � -,n;rructed affordable lamilv housing proiec�. The I�!e-cyde assessments be[w>�_�
� � � j . two vaned because ol the date o�mnstruc ion `or th? pro�ects. The oriq���.�.
, ` � �
��.�•. ■ . . . . .. .. I' �,i.r;. ,� _ �-� a'P.r i ._��rl-� .�;.� . .
� ��—� !�
���
�
RES.E Page 151 of 21Q
A,?LrIIT��T�P.t uc�'E���
�� �i ..� ADA COMPLIANCE
�
__�+af � � ,�_,ni i pi,�i�_.�, 5� inai d � v�•,i . �.�.r-,i , i i-� �a,,t� � ae S G, r:a���,._,
i �,il ARi ;bivr�. to d0 ° ��eh ��I � u ( i�qr�r�,v�'' i ��i nrvv, u n vaC✓��n,� r i� �ioCi.
��>
—.-5--- ornplyiny w�th AUA/A84 s[and�id �z standard lur cverY pro�e� . We hoec been
����":�;�� �,volved in numerouc renovarlon prolects ihai required bnnging pro�eas into
- � "• �:;��nplianca Careful �n-held assezsment a^d doamentaticn of existinc ronditicns
� ,uch as par��na, walkways. doors, restrooms and fixrwes is key �o wccessful
I �;c.
— _ # i;;�B�TI l�o� �'1 J� IFC`1P1� S�dlA � lp��b'^l�_'�IS
B � � �, ('y� ��� ❑TY OF SEATTLE,ADA ON-CALL CONTRACT
L.L �
' = ha, a � _ . _. � -a� c�nt��ct w;h i��e �tv oi Seatoe [o -2v�eev ACA anci
� �:
�.m �r•,�'�- ' � �.��er a� -� �„�,ea �,ernen�,s �� a�b�� oro�ect> dev�aned `ar the oiv. We
� � � � �� researched dnC found �ne bea exisiinn checkGSts (or access�t��llry an�lyss -
.,, _ � ��Fi� � --_,— . - .� _ now broadly shared with cily prolect manaqers - and deveioped a mmpliance
' — form that addresses drawings, zpecifications. submittals and shop drawings.
-� � � --�' : and in-field �nte�ior and exterior measurements. Our reviews are based cn the
i;.�� ii rnosl su'mgent requirements of Yhe 7010 ADA Standards for Accessible Desl��n
. . (Depar�rr�em of lusnceL [he Gty of Seaide Buildlny Code. and ANSi A1 n.l. The
� . reviews aie shared wlih ciry srarf, n�orrct desiqn reams and [he con;racto�s.
l � PUBUC,NON-PROFIT AND PRIVATE PROJECTS
� t -
� . � Ou�publ�-. .^n-oe6t.ndpr�va-ep�o���_tseach`ollcwthemoststrmgentaccessibifty
��'-1=` .-,�,��_� . �_ac��oa��p'o�ea3 N__�..1����rvmnslderingbarrier-F�eeandunlversal
, � - - :ies��gn,na;rea�s ail Ind'.viduals equaliy and mai is slmple and intul[ive. For example,
�--. � �:�;ide hallz chang?s of color and [exture,incegrated ramps, and icons that designate
� ��� �,, n��m use are helpfui co all laciliry user5 and patrons.
��fi - Many of our non-pr��fit dients serve special needs populations. For szniors and
.� ,� U�e hard of seeing, conuasting coloa provide environmen[al dues [ha�help assure
� � safety. Fur the ha�tl of hearing, we have deslyned mwti-use rooms with enhanced
.�� ,',` \. �,� AV and acoustic sys[ems. For a shel�er ioi domesdc vlolence survlvors,we provided
' i �,� more accesstble residentlal unies than required by code g�ven that a dlsproportionate
� ���� � number of these women have mnbil tv ch�911en�e�. All proiec.s are unique and
� � �� � �Nnovations reqi�ire cr?ative soluUOns � > ��r-�� � . . . . , . �
I
� � �peri?nc=and expen�se in code requ�re� -
.r. _ �-:'� ,
:� 4�1
° �� �`�:� , I ;�
�
_ I � 1
- � , �
� �
M I I I; !I;.f ;�
+Il, .1 ' I�� ;- 1
�r���' ��
�.. - _ .�..
�:= �
�-
RE�.E ` Page 152 of 210
AhCHITE�TURE GE�IERAL Fi�O�-;�IUr�P_ SERVICES/A&E ROSTER
Hu,��s�zn�:.
, HISTORIC PRESERVATION
� The pi?se� i.on o( n� �n�lc buildln � r�quire; i �,ec'a�dnq a�c de[ermining a
buildlnq's in[�iiw and�x[e��or ;haiac[er defininy feswies T^�=_Knoveledge gives shape
�
��� � �.oprr�'ervauo»[nrrgz,an�t�epoienualadapiive�P �,2o(ihe;irucwreasrequiredby
��
�, `_ s �� [heAare0f5ceofHisCOricPreserva[ion ITdehneswhichfaaturastopreserve, aswell[he
• � � � �,a ue and meaning �hey provlde,which�an help �he Inierests of landmarks preserva[ion
- _ � Loards, the Wa,hingron S�a[e Depar[ment of Ardieoloyy and Hismri�Preservation,and
� �-��"��^".,�.���_ � ` � � ��:her I�cal jur.sdlctions. Straiegies to consider are the I'ollowino.
�? � .Il�,j �, _ Architecture: A�chl;ecwral cpd�tes need [o respea the his[ory oC[he bullding, New
� — '' ��'• ;��? a�chltecrural In[e�ventions sheuld reFlett curren- design and not repll=te ?he past.
� � ' ��i er 3•� of t��ie Washlny[on Sta�e Bu;ldlnq Code provldes qu�dance and establ�shes
� � i� d �or exisung historic bwldings The 20'�0 ADA Acce�sibillry Desiqn Guldelines
a: � '�e
��'�' /�'1,��� � � �e�hezame,allowing�orcreat�vesolunonsforhlstoricbu'�Id�ngrenova�ions.
p'�.'yy� -- � — Envelope: Improvemencs[o[he envelope of a historic building have two Primary issues.
' �s aesiheuc In thar enve'�.00e�pgradez oFten�ndude tf�e additlon ol materials inslde
� � � i t,lde oi bulldlnqs. The oi�ier Is �echnlcal knowing how managiny alr,vaoor and
� � -iur� nfil a['�n N,�III�P�ec�the histonc buildinq's performan��.
� \ w Building Systems Upgrades. For h'aloric bulldings. upqrades [o mechanlcal ryscems
��,
�n ad�rr„ m��fon en�rgy use,visual impacts and acnusucs Ele�[rical sys[ems
� � `�� .u�lail� communi�a'ions and da;a - required more space for distribu6on than
� ulder bwl�Lngs provide, Meeony new structural oesgn standrrds often requlres
� -� Idltion oi vis�ole seismic upgrades and demolihon of�xisting ronsi�uctlon. Taken
� �'�.
. . . ..��',Ih_ �� eqrdtbn hi:dd�nq;V � n, i^q'd�i ���wret�, �I ir3tc,lapprodChfo
� � � if�iZ2 if�(�9'S Orl�'hei9 'dafi^inc I°aRi�?i
Select Sample Projects
� � � _ �. Pon Townsend Ciry Hall
� UW Center for Pediacric Dentistry
�—= -- ��„� �� LakeClryl_Ibraryln5ea[de
�_,,,,,_ _ FllensburgCiryHall
�� Ginny Ruffner Stu�io(in Historic 8allard)
� �� Ecks[einCommunl[yCem�erandSenlorHOUSIng
�� �
� „� � �\` .._ _._.
' I�;��; �
` I � �
� ,c. � �p ,'��' - �
�'+,�'�'' I �, " .0 t �'.- �—
��� 1�. .'4.. ..,Y
y
��9' ��'1n. '�. F
.,.�, .J "'�' ' `�F - `jT � .'k I ..+ �A ��; :rl�
�qi'L , � j����`� i I ��a,
� � � � ?\'°lP��'� .` '.a . . .. f�,.'`_.._; . .
� :
w. .
,
�.? ' �jw_„�` � � a "� '_
y�� .
_. ' r���% `3 (,.I� ` .�,. ,' --�
_ � ••� — �-
_ _
Y -_ __ ...� -_
���.. _.. — .���
RES.E Pa�er1�3 of 210
Ar;i..HiT��;_T.:,-.��;���,�_`.�.�
LEED Consulting& Sustainable Design
4li��fhx:•� il' l��I�lts� frrinlii�ll` 1u�����n�i:IVt '1�.Tnl-' ii:r. i.1i i I� icC'.rC . . �. '�iil�-
i0ve�.t ., . .�a , ion m^n' n r �xl--a�5 4�� h,r ..i
history o`inregr;;in,s,.stainacle design in i[5 projzcts,effective'�, EVERGREEN SUSTAINABIE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
considering F•st costs ard the long-term costs and th2 benefits a j � -,. _, .�����.;; r�•i^�a `�a����,-=
o( env�ro�men�a�'y resp�nsible des�gn. Th�s �n�egratel aes�gn Pn �� H�_::s'F�r• I, , .,. ,; � � �����,; � ,• �y�A
approach maRes carniec[ions beiween bWiding and site. These � � � _����. __ ��_..;.ng r,,. �.,�,-��o��> >�A�,�o� ;;
mnnections Indude �o^sideration oF roof w;tzr run ofF, av�an � ��r?enc �'ie�i.�c DVS ol Snohomish County
conidors, heat island mlrigaY��on anC brownfield red2wlopment.
With75percen[o`ourstaffLEEDA¢redired,wear?conmittedto LEEDGOLD
inmrporating green d�slgn Into ead�i project tnal we do. Bevond PACF. ie�?Ciiv Flali
the matfixes ofs�s[alnable deslgn are lhose elemen[s tnal air�� I� rl> >>;�.�,i � n�luge-P�u���c'��i�_i
reFlectionofthedients'envlronmentalmission. _. �u� - . ,. -� i � ^-:�����..; c����c�.
We have successfulN shepherded mult�ple projects through !h"
LEED c=�[ificat�on process and continue to do so. We are al;c LEED SILVER
veised 'm the evergreen Sustamable Developr�enr Sranda�a_ r-_ � _�_���� �os:�, __��,'.,��
associared uvi[h Washingion 5[ate Housing Tius[ Funds. We are ��^r��m�r;i,��,.-„���ia=_��,_e
commirred ro working with you and your team [o develop tne Port Townsend Ciry Hall
a�nron���n=s�,<i�inaMr:ir�ie�]i2s inr��:hnm��,.-.
° �i. .�f. �A
�_"`""�,�- - �, , .
_�° '�� , ;�,
4�_ � .;;:
� � �� 7 — � �t -_ -
� ^ �) ;� ' �.a�
� �if� ���� :I �`e't ���^� �} - _ `.C"�
,Yl�%ILTEO �`� .
_CITYNnII`.. '�" " t . .
4- '- � - - ��:=���_�
_-_�—
,��� ��1 ' ' � z �
� _
� - • _ � r�
� � �� ti '
_ :1 � � �, _ - �' � - ��
ti ,,,T,... � . 1 !�! .,� . -� �
'I .y F� J 'II`� � �
�� �1 � � ���� ( ��I� �� � 1 - �
.,
`
t�'.1 � � ,�. � i 'f_""�" � � .
I� L'•'� 1�k � �1 li It 1
.. , `_ �,,� µ �0 :�'�p� �y I ` .
� ��� ���� � �
� �: u-����a�"��
�,�.--.
_ b � _ �
RES�.�C Page 154 of 210
� � � i �
� '. � . � '. , . .... , ' � °.. . . , . .�. � • • •
. • • � •
t __
� i •
-_ •.. �
. . ��,,,�� -•- -
'ky . '
-: r .
T
i . �
. .� �
6 Y
_ � 1 � '1,� ��e�
�I',�
r
- �Ap
� ,
� �
� � �I � Cy,
� ,�.Vf ■ •^1.
, _' o a X� ���� N' � 'd��s, .;����'���,_�,.'• � �'�� +�i� 4
;ri,a.'�, � ' '?,; �� , "-r;s � i. .� ,�:. �3� . A� ..
p r . . s• ,.��,._ .. , � " � ', .
. ,r � �4u . , J � ,.g r■� ,''�I
c " y�. � . �' i ,: . M{� . .f� �� �. .1 i(i
�--, �� ,�'�i� , '� , ��S�, ;r�. } � ' .°., � �;, i' . o ,r x L ;:�' �, �.. . `. .. �' .
.C',� �i � i-Y�r 'rr. '��� �' � � � �Q
� �� r,�t I,i d• ti. .r 1 Iq SfY'. { 1 ', i �� S.� i i � � � I .
� �0��� l1I . . ;� .y'�,,�11�. .�, ��� C,`p f ' �'� ; � ( � i� �A,l � . t�if.
� • � %�Y r' �� �+, r n�i1f1�� h� i i �� � ��� � I ��y ri�s,�,_�.
• � 01��� y � ! '� , i ��� l � /� i li i �Il1� �
��� �0�� � � � .m , ..�� 1I� 1��� �� �1 . 1 /�7�� �� � 1 .r � � � _ e
�Fi I q
9 �� „ a . , ;, � �i ,', l�l'���t �;� � R�� r� �.
\ 1 II�YI � 1 II r I � � �
,� I �1 '1'� ���¢�1 fJ ��� � r .1' ',� r � w� v, .i� � � � .ii � N � i. �q �� ���i� � �:�' � i �
�. « + ��ii I ♦ �� I ^/yp�\�� . f Q��� ' iy ,/t" � f, '. ♦ , I�I' ;� �'.
r. h V
!� l' l , � .;. t , 1 r.y, �e �.� �� ' :'�L,� i y i
�. �"�'•'y�, ',�� ��� . ,r� _�y� �I����''�cv�+;�a � i �t����'� �" � � �r "a Rr� �,�' p
,� � ; �. ., � •
_ ��. .y'Y'"y� �1f(�i, ������ i� : N, M�� 5,�. �w, y ��! !x .�, r,�.' �
„ �. ;` . , � „ � ,
�;�►�1, ..W, � :� 't�. ...... . •c° '.;.� .�
, X ,,. ��� �.� � . + [ � � ..
�„`. r.�� � � �le . ,�..a�ti � '� ,���.� f �� �z:
f( ` ��,y��y , � � , �� �,��:r� .�.�' ',�, r.� Page 155 of 210
1T'� �% �{ M k � .fl� y.
" !"'��a`� ' -'•r3 u 1 . �,.�,
� f J %'�'/�i"_'-�.�f t _ � • .a '!:ilG`x
FUGLIC FACILITIES
i
PUBLIC FACILITIES
-_ � ,:_�., �: ,n;o��� i �roasedpro�eas�nthepublicseaorslnce7976,helping
�.� �d :.nu❑i p p�r�7e bullding5 [hat improve [he qualiN of life (Dr [heir
� �� "''�- :Nni,. �li long-stan�finy locus guides o�r mission� Archirec[ure [hat is place-
� ' -� � - .v�afic,ieFlecnnqtheh�story,cultu�e,valuesandasoi�azionsofthepe:,plewhouseand
� -���.»rt the b��ldings we have[he honoi of designirn3.
.
.';-�ohen lead studies and desi9n efforts that are used to gamer public and financlal
�� i,� -�aurt lor publicly lunded projecs indudi�y parks, mmmuniry cen,ers. city halls,
: �I � " � � :-mcome housing and special needs populat�ons. In each case, o�treach [o Che
� �f �' ���munity and prov�d�ng in(orma[ion for decs�on makers se[s the s[aqe for projeas
�,�'i. � �i� -.,;vinq forward: public acceptance,refined programming,a�d understanding project
���11'
��;te'��rf�� , � �.::�e[s.
r��..,
� � ■ �� .�� :;nc facilitles require d�ligent unders[anding of the dient's needs,users and pacrons,
C � 'I�,�e[and siee consua�rns. We work dosely wi[h ow cllen[s and consul[ant [eam ro
� � . � , {„,,�:_ ���rmine[he bes[useof space,durable materials,susta�nabiesystems`or each projett.
— �..,,wi �. �r:e of cub l l�i��nrs io �ate enj�cab�e looa .as• n i � "�es �s e,sen;la�
�_ _� _ �, a�.i ;n rel i��.!�i,:�.�,,,-. - -
� � , DINING HALLS AND FOOD SERVICE
���` � �
— .., bw �J 1 � ,�.�yl. �rnvi.i�, "��� i i.i Ce'1',aa i J ic.2'�901 , i, �e rna'u,�e.dr�l
�b,��ii 7 hylls. We work with lood serv��e eonsw[an�>and >upplie�s to deaeiop designs
� �' I "r' r����9 eqwpment that meet[he needs of use by mulliple aroups,for zervice[hat rang=s
� ; � � u i��m ��ic in i �.1iinG i diP�; lo I!ill n� d pc C, � ri� W= h3 'a i ,nNd k tC'1e�5
x�. �?_.�- � lid �nr�-I � �i�i i�l, �l . i�_,�., n '-� n- ��. � i i,75 9yc
^+ ,.--.l, � .. _ L . .
�—� � � � � �_� . 's � FIRE STATION DESIGN AND PIANNING
. � µ 'r
���� y � ,'� 1 I`lAlle � IN.pv. Il I1�'1� y�, I � V'ICI� � )��y'�� I U�.I � �1,I LLllp.
�. / F
���;y�4y �.p�y l � �.—���f� cli if(:�ll('ell flt7fil UICQOfI �J hC�G �� `/E�UO d �ifC Sld�lOfl �'OCfO�IU fUl ChC' hlRi, Trl�(
'��`P;� +c "'"L s 'r' k ry� Jfort has been surcesstul m iha[we are.,urrently working on[wo fire�ta[ions for the
.,� � rC�' ��:. ,dfl'.;`l
City of Seattle and have done an as=_essment of a third-Paul, whlle w!th another firm,
� ��� �.7rsigned a hr•a7quartrrs sratinn and live satzllite s[a[ions in O�egon.He has a Persunal
�onnection ro fire stations and fire serv�ce culture,as his grandfathee fathei and unde
� a�e reCired fl� hghters. These publicly fur�eC projects fitwell wrth ARC firT experience
dii'.I �f1n!��IP�� e �)i O�Oe ib.'T,.1�NAli.1' Y k i,i•�rill;`Di �l1bI�.0 0 d:llilQ.
LIBRARY DESIGN
�
. �ir .1�. .-�[ii iiil,i��n�._ �.ne�-i�, . l i .���., _ , i� �_. �...
�� 4 � , i _'ti.�_ i . .�'�i�J t- ai.,:�y � 1J IC'� lt . Jt �- �1H1�1-
� .�. mam ib�3�y.We understand s��e ' s���n cr te•�a CollecUOis r-iar,agement s,s�em
���'M - I�rements and:he technology�nf asvucture needs(or sma ier libraries. Depend�ng
s � �, ihe pro�ea and the dients needs we hue a librarv des�r�n consul[ant ro help wt[h
E �,�Y��; .; r ,; .1C' ���e speclalized libra�v reqwremenis. We ha�e des���oned I h•arles ha ser�P[he nced���
�I • .. dClt,lls.CEPnS dnd _'•��'?� i ; ,�ir :� '
_ _ _y� . .-. . .. "e. , �'_ . . . _ :..
�.,� .
- - m;o i commin�
- ..;
� °_': .
RE�.�� Page 156 of 210
I
PUBLIC FACILITiES PROFE5510NAL SERV'CES/A& E ROSTER
nuc�_�t1 au� �
RECREATION FACILITIES AND GYMNASIUMS
AwC is well known tor �� �-.ear��on and eo�v-wnity cen�er �-�h;tecture O eni�.lor w iom we'oe�iry��nesl pi.iMrlacillias�.
having worked on over 50 reaeaeon aod eommunity center programming
and design projects.We have designed for a broad range health and fit^�ess CiUes of:ew�sron and Clarkscon(study)
i aes.racq uetbz I I and squas h,wei�h[s/card�o,�a nee/aerobks/Zumba a nd Cty of Bellevue
s��:ngle ancl doub!e gymnasiums(`or baskecball,volleyball,badminton,pickle Ciry oFFederal Way
ball, and events). Each of thesz spaces have specifi�_ sports requirements Ci;yoflssaquah(competltion)
and op-ions for Flexlble use of the rooms. Design of a gymnasium requires City of Kirkland
expenence [o underst�and the myrial ol' praduct opuons �nd systems Gfyol Mukil[eo
coordinadon required. We work wi�h dlenes to develop deslgns diat mee[ Gry of Port Angeles
[hei� recreaiion needs, �ake advantage o(sile opportuniiies,connea with CiW of PortTownsend
the outdoors,and brin��acural daylight into the buiiding. We�nderstand CiryoY Redmond
the aar.e:y of supoon wes �equlred for�hese fadllties, like administration, Gry of Richland
+:oraqe.loccer ro2r5s,t�,cili;v managemen[and securiry,and AVSys[ems Ci[y ofSammamish
Gty of SeaT�c(s[udy)
SWIMMING POOLS Cllv o(Seatde-4 cen[ers built,7 studies
Ciry of Snoqualmle(s[udyl
ARC Ardil[ects has wor,aa on aquatic center riudles For Sau[h Whldbey Gry ofTamma
Island, Skagit Counry, Ralnler Beadi, Bellevue, �ammam'ah Boys ani Grls Gry ofTUkwila
Oub and die cities of Oarkston and Lewiston.We c�mpleted assessmen�s Gry of Washougal
foi Evans and Q�een ?.nne pools In Seattle, and envelope upqrades on CowlltzCounry
Evars PooL Most significant is the�ecen[Rain�er 8each Community Cente� Kittitas Counry
and P�ol the first new indoor pool in the Ciry of Seattle m 40 yeais. Wiih[his Normshore Schooi Dis[rin
expe�lence,we unders�and[he detalls ofaquaticuses and work wlth aqua6c Seattle Nousing Au[horlty
des�gners[o develop the praqram and specifc aquaoc requ�remen[s for each Skagit Counry(swdy)
pooi a�d ac�essory spaces.We k.now how ro use ouilding orien[abon lo South WhldbeV Island lswdy)
reduce ene�gy use,and[he Impo«ance root and wal'design[har mltlga[es Suquami�h Tribe
aqains,daa�aqe that can be caused'oy indoor pool envlronments. Universiry ofWashingron
Washingron S[ace University
THEATER AND PERFORMANCE Washington State Parks
uur �or�.munlDi cente�. exRerience Indudes mulCi-use spaces that are for
iern.��es,sp�e��es.�mm�nunile ihearre.and muslc per`ormances. Importarn
qua!i[ies o�� [h2se spaces are a�_ous[ics that have enou9ii "livelin2ss" to
enhance[he experlence:audlo visual and IiqhUng systems[hai are easy lo
use wrth enough at[ribu[es to s�pporf a wide r�nge ol perYnrmances and
needs,irom playz,to lecwres,to weildiags and o[her private even[s,[o muslc
of all types;accessible stages so crat�.�eoplz wlth dlfferznt abilires,and the
very young and the not-so-young can pa«Icipate, and spaees that can
adjus�to a vanety ot sea[ing arianqements and a�dience s¢es. Depe�ding
on projec[smpe,we work w�[h acous�c enyineers,lighung de5igners,and
thea[erdeslgners[o develop the bes�sp�ces pessible for ourdlenis.
Gur mos[sophistica�ed facillry Yor rhese�ses is Roseh�ll Community Cen[er
in Mukilteo, Was���ingmn It ind��des a stage wiih proscenlum, fly space,
mo:orized line ses anc pipe battens, sCaqe nyqlnq and draperies, an
am�sbc shell [ha[can be raised and lowered, pro�ec[or and screen, piQe
i I �'vs'�r'i �ii -��0'v;� � i-.i� ��Min i u q .1�����„ i _, ip,i � I �.:; _
RES.E Pa�e�1�57 of 210
PUD��L hA.'"_ —TIU
RAINIER BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER& POOL '�_;�TTLE,WA
L�-ateci �� i�e most L �e� _ ne��gh orhond In -
Seatde, �,hE Rairner Bexh Commt,n�ry Center
replaces an ngmg faali v on ;he same si�e. The - -- = , ., �
_ * '
45,000 square foo[ program indudes an aquatic '��e� -� � � � �
cen[er mmplete with mmpetitinn and recreatlon '�
pools,a gvmn�sium,mulilpurpose rooms,hmess
room, das>rooms an�i childcare.The mmmunn�. �"'�"" -.
�ias actively involved in the programming anc ,,,-,�_° '�-�� " �'�
�'rn�.�,m- JR'Tf'M1:�• ��
designofthisfacillty, CurrenUyunder�onstr��c[io� °'m' � � lrrrn - ,�
wi[hopeningsetforFaU2p13. ��h"'*'1"! "'1 ��''7 � �� - -"��' �
. ^ e . .. J, ��'�iiA�� ,���.��� �-_
:_: ; ,�, ,,;�., . 4 -,�
Loca[ed on an urban si�e,ad�acen! �o iwo pub��`�_ `^�-" t ' ' � �.� :; . � �
schools, [he new 6uilding epens �p to tne �J - - ~ "'�tl1n'}'��-�°-�- �-• ���� �
' .��
nelghborhood to welcome Chem ;o part�c�ale '� ___. __- �.��A"_�
and en�oy [helr new communiry wnter The ��-,.�„�:.M -
park�ng was iocated on [he north edye �c _
maximize the public presence of [he buildin, �� �
along Ralnler AvenueSouth. --- � ,,.�
i
...,., ` .,. � __ ./ .
All the main spaces open up to outside patio or � � _
platas so events can occur insidz and ou�. An �K�-`�� "�`--� . - .. ..
��•,
existlny pla�a at the south was ex[ended [o lhe ��� � - '^�-.�,.,_ _ ' �:ii ; � � � �
new bullding wlth added [er:aced seating and ' � - ,� -- '�I�
a separ3!e plaza I'or Che pooL The gym is on Che . ���� �` � '� �-�� �
north for the oest natural dayllghting and opens �� �p � � .,I
, ; ' - '
ue to a large plaza for mW[ipurpose evenls. . � �,_ 3�-.-,i—`-�^--' - ..---- �_ -
-__ i�— y _
Deslgned LEED Gold-c�rrently under review. �.'""�� �"�� I� � -�
� � .___ - ---: - . ..
� �
. . .
__:- �....,-: - ��.: . . .
.t'•_ ' ' _ - -_- -
!
� :
l fy� " /
�� w ; {`' /� "�_
� �� ',
�-�--�-,---°-�---�' , ".;- �
� � "_`; , i-, >� ' f,�,
^ � -
" �� -�r' ' ' '�
: _ �
c�WNER iNFO�.Seatt!e Parks&Recreation ?��--�� � �� � � � � ~� " � -�
, i v ' i"' �-
SQUARE r00TAGE 48,000 sf T-
� �: - �� ��$ �� - _
DATE OF�OMPLETION:2013 � �- � .
,nUf?.�J IiJ�1�05� >ih,550,000 �Al3K:G ' - .
RE�.�� Page 158 of 210
�CB_��_ � _ �_i����e; F _.FC , �i�� . ���EE';C�_;��P,�; EROSTER
y I . _ — ___
AUGUST?0';
ROSEHILL COMMUNITY CENTER N!UKI�TEO �'dA.
�_ �,�o� o a��� ._ '� � _�_
�omn�wnity �emer occup�es a p�om�ne�n s_
in Old Town Mukllleo, a par[ of town ih i � , �
charac[erited by a ml.e of architecwral sty�e an�: ` ,�,,,, "
uses. The impo«ance of the site was not I� , ;��� � ��� ;�.
[he Ciry, who hired ARC to swdy develoFr c-� � � � � � ��i
,� _ �....._-.� -tA�.: -
options. Options were developed arni � �-� u� '--- , � " . ��,.� -
a public vore, the decislon to bwid a ��r - �-� � I - � � i � �,
� + -r- � h
mmmunity cent�er was maUe. �-J� T�' f J�;� �� y�,,� , � � _�
�. � . i � � _ �--�
ARCworkedwuhaCitizenDesiynComrnuer ��n,> .-� � �
reviewed opuons�ncl made mcomm�nilai o �s i.� � � �
OLyCounrilloithelifinalapprovaLihMumnun,f� _ - - "�' �-.�__ �„��� � ��.�x'�
.:��:: I j -.,�,,,-� . ,
reviewed archl,ecwral concepts, and wha! � --� � �;,.� .�
evolved was a desiyn of relatively small sc�led _ °-'�
forms that utlllzed wood and stone rn�iF �i:, -
befitting the character of the Old Town. La�q;
windows cake advantage ol [he comni3�v.:- ,
view of Puyet Sou nd,and varlous rooms a�e'����.-., _
- _..._
ro outdoor spaces induding a yrassy area u��_��.���.�
in(ormal activities and ehe farmer's Markei. -� - _
is a raised terrace overlooking lhe SounC 3 ��..�. . - . �
urban pla�a that is used for dty-wicle event . - � ��I
�� !
The center(eatures a large social hall thai .�. _ h ' � '� ��—
o(the mosi popular piaces for wedd�ngs � i A' �
region and designed for communily lheai �. �� �a j,;�I ���-���
music Other uses mdude an a«s and craft � � �- -��
- -� :�.��''�cy`�,+�'�^��..
qameroom,mee[inq/dassrooms,aseniorsi ����. ' �� F
a�d fitnes roams ro� aPiob�a. d3�� y,,qa a���:� �� �i ,, � . -:� ��A�r����
�,:�:a �oa. � �� - r_ -- �`"',��� . �
� -.- k l����J �
.r
� , � -- -- - --- ,�
� �
� �
, , ��_;� ;
r la�•�Q � �
y � _
I l.� � ,� i _i �
� �,. - - r i
�' '.2. y„ � iy
` '�� �1�0..
W
� �
SQUARE FOOTA�iE.30.00U�I � ��� r°zM� �-
_ ,V .��� �.F�l �w�' '
DnTE OF COMC�ETiON:ZO' ' ' 't -�
' , �
_ _ � °
RES.E Page 159 of 210
���7i_IL �':�p.._I�I �IL�
LAKE CITY LIBRARY ADDITION AND RENOVATION S�ATT�E,WA
ARCs desiqned rne re�ovaoon and addiibn tu
[he�ake Ciry�iorary,a e�rli-loved,award-w nrnn-�
modem bu�itling designed in Che mld-1�d60�s.
It recelved landmark status from [he Sea[de�s r��--
Landinarks Preservanon Boa�d shortly before �
ARCs work mmmenced. The desig�aCion ��,sa< �'�s
important [o the mmmuniry and [h� Bo�i I �n�� -�- - � �
had influen�ed thr�esi n ou*mm in sionif�can[ " � �� ��� ' �
ways�. The integriry ol [he ex[e�ior �n� nlu�_� �'. .d', n ��f � �P.'y .,,,..
of the maln reading room was preserveu ���_� T�' �� � ri�� .�� ,' �. �� � ��'.,
��. �
addition is integrated with [he exist nq b�..� �' ' � �� (�� � � I
mntrasCS in subtle ways;and the enoV����i v.���i � _ ''�,�' � „���� �� �� '� ����
— wldi gates by famed Seattle a iu �r � �r � . .
Tsutakawa-was preserv�a. � i�- i - -- ' ,-,� '
�• {,� ' '�I�;"�'�'�F,:.
, - �.�.�_ .
The�panu�dilbrarylsanln�ec�ralp�ninLakeGry��, � .
civic campus, whlch Indudes a nelghborhooc __ .
. - '+,1 -� : . ,\ o.
service center civlc �laza commun�ry �en[_r. �� � i
pubiic pa.k public a�[an�l below grade parkinu. � . ��� �F'
ARC worked wlth muli,ple public da�nu�ti ,�_ Yy � � � �-�� � • ��� -
F���x� ..,C"Fr+C4't��� II .
develop [he overall slte plan ihai wo�k. n �h ,�� � _
adiacent t��ildinqs and com�.nunny. - +�� � , �".
i � _ ..-,:�� � , ����
� y' �
� 9� � '..�� ►
� ,� ��`�_� ��'`� ° �
� , �
� ���;:�''1�1`'��� i'�� "`� � �,,; �
� if:�1��� °:°i� �*`t ' �� 1 fi� e-
S'� 7 ° �,� , -•^
`, ,,.�' _ -,• �,'��3'l11�_ `
''� - _ ..- __- Y �
, z ; �' _�_�
� , �- - �� ! �a ��
� :� �r+ , , n .�
� 1 � 1 � �r,.` " _, i' 6�� �� �
� 7 � 7 1 j ; � � �! ;�`'.�,,,,�,
�i� � � � � � * , �� ;�, � � �f —
�� � � # � .� _.�_.._. �, err'�
owNER wFO szz<<��r�, i�� .�e.�;,�� � � '1 � � �� `�� �' �
s�unRE r-oorn�e zo,ao; ,� � I� �
�li
DAT. UFCOMP�ETIOM. T � T�
-.PI-TGJ� '�I=OS`. ,. ,� �'_ _� �� i
RE�.�` Page 160 of 210
PUCi�IC FAC[UT�ES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/A&E ROSTER
Ai�i�,i ic7�p-;
THEATER AND PERFORMANCE
TEATRO ZINZANNI,SEATTLE WA I�'� ��
T�dn� .'_;i �ii i �rr �ri� i��, �Jm i L1Y
rh�: hoic h �uesi� In �ir : u n �� ��- � �
_y . �
Searleacrosslrom5eal�JeCenter.Thethn��<-������, �,..-.w,-�,;.. �,
s
dlnner clrque, comedy and cabare[perfor�-�;��--.-- '�� -,�-��"',=�,i
occurs in a SGiegelteni—a tum-ot [he c�� ,�: .."�`.�-'J� _�
Beigtan traveGng ten[ constructed oi wo.,- ����i �. �
canvas, dec�2ted wI[h mirrors and staina�t ^��
i
glass. ARC Architects designed modular ouilding � � Q � �•�':'
surroundingthetent,whicnhouses[heio�ibv.a°. � '�� �� _�` ;`:r-- ���"' .
shnp bar,ki dien back �(house oeri�nriei 3��is � � � `0 �
i � � � � I �
ni s�n -n .1P,'� , I. -"� tl n- � _ � � �� .i _
� ��.� , i �.. - _
, _ '_��n �i �..���-hie�.je�. �� " _ _ — —_ -
------------ —_. — -
, _,. _
_„_ _
... .---- ..
FOSTER STAOIUM,TUNWILA WA -
The Fo>Cer S[3di�u�i in 1�ROViIa ha+ i i . i��.'� �
iarger announdng booth endoserl ar� , _� ���
coach�,, handicapped accessiblliry Yor fans. :�rn1 - � � �
aestlietic upurades that make the titaiw� ", . ' �
nea�ly new,The new building IndudPs spa i � 6 - ,,y�„
ticketinq,concessions,restro��ns ana sloia� TI = ��' ��� - - � � `
space between the [wo bwldmqs �s the a�i� ,��,- � � �-^. -'
� ���tR++� - . ,_.. ' .. - � �'� _:
101hNifiililTi � ' 9[I � � . �� f ni�, _ . --, `"
�_,n..p T
0 'l..ld _ .'r bV i N I JGI � '� "r""�
fi I I� ..�.. � � q�
� �.. � � . ,�.
ROSEHILL COMMUNITY CENTER THEATER, �
MUKILTEO WA
H�usr ' �n � iie , 1.011 } �o-•im ini c � .�, ,-
1h lhe .z {,-t .� �i0v e 1 LiWy irwl pu � -r !� - � �
�o� *--+�"' �
oew�. ��h u �n�udes lradit��nal live ilir = ��� i� y
capabilities su �. as ]ty space ar� rw� .,, '. � ' {`',` ' 4 ... -i ���,..- �:.^�
�ydorama thevtrical II� hnnq, ser s[o�a1e i _ .
rooin ancl a r3i eJ sta�e tht�e�tte� ea �_ '
can also be confiqured ro allow for a var� � or �r,_.. - '� _ �^� �� . _ ��:�� I,
/ . .T �,_ - ' ';i� �I' ,_ �, .
music,bancue:s aindude lecwres, vve��m , - � �}� � � i r ��� ►��sLa � -� �
. : . .. ,, . � ,.� '. . „y _,i �
id exh brts Compllr�enl� i
catenngki[chen�dlrectsFil! overspaceloo i � - . � � �
.,��+�n� 1 � �
le�race. amphithPa'er ani ou[door pHza �� � " �� ,��,�
35 5 bF��lin i vi- ] o' �n n�l `J2� �, i I �. P +��lmlbd -
f'i_t`�-L %�lf� 1 ,��"0: "�a� -�
drdi ,l��CrJ Tl � n'alt� . 1�'0l.
RES.E Pa�er161 of 210
r��J���'�_ �l'��ILT C�
SWIMMING POOLS/NATATORIUM
PUYAILUP INDIAN ELDER CENTER TACOMA - � "� � � �E
, �r,�. ,, � i:, . � �� . �y ... � �
.. i��,: � .. i. . i . .. . ..:. !l'L'k � _
and reiaxa�ion nee�7s oi u�e �fnoes semo�� - � �
an important element of th2 Cen[er's hea!'��� �� � _ - � �
wellness offerings, which also indude a �. ' --.
center, health an�l weilness coumeliny a�� �� '6 � � -
long leaminy A sauna and steam room rn � � ;. I _ 1 �
adJl[ional[herapy and re5plte spaces for lhe i� �:���� _���-- ' ��
Elders. Acoustics are very Important in a�i 1� � � � ��� -�� �
spaces, especially wilh an aging poPUlaUO�� s��_ . - �-� � . �� �
� ,
�t is important ro incorpor�te these early �n i�r � �`--� � � >"�
devqn of the fadilty. __ _
THE NORPOINTE CENTER POOL,TACOMA .. ��-
Ili�; J'.000 SC COmiTlbmCy C�nLei v, �,_',�.fieJ
with two wlnys surrounding a�enlydl I Lb� )n--� � "�-���,
wing is dedicated ro athletics and fitnes5 a��d � _ �
provides racquetball courts, an aerobl¢ room, a J� ' �_��^ �+
gymnasium,and Ihe na�atorium. The ndtatOriur� - ..1...��6' _�-=�*^ �
indudes a combmaoon le�sure and lao pool e�'�o� �- - -� � � ' � �..�:�---"� „
zero-beach access,water UIaY �eawres,ane a so? _ � _� ' � ,�r
for(ainiry use-Thls space�a ver��act�ve an�i pop���� -
w�ih the v�ew efine�rees a�i�i natu�a dav�ylong_
� �
I
�� � ,i,nihl�nan-�,
.._:.�_�.�.�!!.I'ililllll;'..i,u��.: �.,. __
RAINIER BEACH COMMUNITY CENTER POOL, , +��-��
SEATTLE,WA -� ��'�-...••,,., � ---��'
, , , ,,, � � ��� � 11 R�1Y_ -
u,�, � �i �t � -, � � �,� ,���.�� � � q��
a spa, and a sauna ih� poob are Jrv�le<I ,:. �. � � � ^ � �^a
gl�ss wall to allow the room iemperaiure. i� �:�- jr�, ; ,,�a4�� � � �"� ��
set 2-4 degrees above tf�e water temperv�ure The � C ' �y ,� �s g'- _ �_ �
-. .�:".�i.iin'� -_< r..�
pools are loca[ecl on thc sou�h of the buildlnq t� � _ ��,,,,�: ° ��-,.��'� - , �
maximi�e heat gain, however,exterior sunshade�� � � . �
and h�[er�or roller shades minlmi�e qlare anu � " - �—�'
allow lifeyuards to ad��st ihe davl�ghGng. The .rs ��� '� r - � �
coMpetition 000l mdudes touch pads and 1u'� - �-L = � !'
eiec«on�c scoreooa�ds br record�ng compent�o-� � �:
nm=s. D�humN�f 3��c- �nr. n����.��1 �-,*in��;l � ,:
. � �.�� :: . �ry��.. n*y.
. . . _ . . ,^'r-:.
RE�.�C Page 162 of 210
PUBUC FACILITIES PROFESSIONAL SEFVICES/A&E ROSTER
auGUSr�a��,
FIRE STATION RENOVATIONS-MULTIPLE LOCATIONS
SEATTIE FIRE STATION 34 - -
a . ir= i i � �c� ii r,i�l i -, �.n ��. .
r�1 9IKI ii0.LG�� lr r 9I. �� � eil'l �� � i
th� aPp��ws bay and uses that �mprov� r,� � - � � ,
quallry of [ime the crew spends ai the s�a�.on. "'��� ��
indudicg the addition �f a finess room and a ~ - �%� ' �
��' �.
dayroom.The seismic upgrade is unobnus'we an�i ��' �' r
�>s, r.� ,y :,: i �7;'� ' 1
a new generator and fuel tank will be �n .. , �,�y�,, _ _
Improvemen[5 to Ihe station indudr �� •''`�` , � •��"�� �
�;
upgrades for areas accessed by the pub�ic `�� `�'r°'�'� � �''�`- ,.f. _ -
The funu��onai and dear or�ani�aGon n� �� . � -�_-� - . - -
X
� i�sre i i - .r�c�,. .. - �- �� �' . r . � -. .
. . �. ... � .� .�. .•�.
SEATTLE FIRE STATION 25 — ,, I
r'lr ,_ �^.31�i;�i " . �. � � _ CRiW�UARTERS • �--.I
indu�ies ,e'^�uc i..pq iles ;o r. e-i o��ie�r. . `-
codes and addi[ion/re�onfiqura[ion o`appaiatus aP-uS suPaoar* � -
r
bay funcoons co improve response �ime and �
functionaliry. Crew area> induding the beanery. AoM�ws*aanor+ �u �, I � "-"
offices, resuooms and Iecker room are receiving � I �
minor Improvements. Two neuv windows wt m �.�� �: �.'...""
[he cast concrete will proe�ide ovelcome dayi�qhi.•n " �
r: I -i
the of�^�ce areas. ADA upgrades fo�those r�?.^. .��� � "� - - - - -I-. °
,he station accesied by G7z public are provla.-�.���:�� � �� �
_ . n n
the addftion o`a ramp and a ne�vi cerrace �:.-� �� �
is also a Clace foi fire fiyhters[o relax and;r:ce s,
wi[h Ihe public A'green wall"is planteo :;�. �.��-: TWENTY•FIVE � ��� ��:'�
[erra�e and prov�Ces a fresh�mage for a bud�:�, ��..; �r � ' � -� ' ' ' � �
�"'�� - -
SEATTLE FIRE STATION 17
AR� il?;��]02;; [h� r�=novalion o� dn n:I:��iC
1920, te�ttl� �r� tnc:on. Thc ro nin inclu.lr�1 '� �
relocaiiui� � mr warch ofiice an�l ass� :�� . � � �L�.�..r� �
a�er[er panel eoor�inaGon, reorganizauon �:r . �
bullpen, beanery, and bunkroom, and z-�°-��.� . � � - - -
ol a separa[e room for :he third raii Ilne.. �� � �
renov�[ed drill mwer serves �s � [ralninq ia. � . — - - �
for other clis[ncr ladder companles. �o���...���
on an urb�n site. ARC worked w�ih ihr i �.�.
on contractor siaging as well as ov� � ���- ` � - � �---� ` . ��
i
nnprovemen[>I'or[he n�ighborh��oud ' � x__ _ . ,� __ _�__�P ��- � '
�
RES.E Pa�er1�3 of 210
�uruc FAaur�Es
PUYALLUPTRIBE ELDER CENTER TACOMA.WA
-he_Id�a Cen:a o�fe•s a s=iene ao�]e�mrcrt.�c��.. — .. _ -
e�vlronment for [he Eiders to relax,soc il � � ��.�
recelve services. The 2h,000-square fooi r���:� - =�
s �
building sits atop a slrping si[e wi[h sweepin�.� j
views o(Commencement Bay and .he Olym,�, _ - �
Range The facilitv ind�de,dassrooms,art room:
a banquei facih[y, a II'ora�y, and a health a���.�.
wellness center w;[h a hydroCherapy puo. . � . , � - _;
T 4
fitnesc and massage ioonu. � , ��� �!�r'�''
�-
r � -�
1he Cence�s design reFleas che i', � uu I�� �
Tribe nauve arch�[eaure and culture _ . � -'- � .pt • __ � .�- � -_�
site planning allowed ior the aeai�c � .� - � - _''���'����`��--- -
campus green space with a Spirit Ga«l��, � �i � � - -,���'pC'_`�J�Y�'
commemorates tribal ances[ors. A wa�e i� . � " � ��
runs through the Sprtit Ga�den represeni , .. ��� ��
Y
�mportan[ PuYallup River. Peeled cedar r �.
scand proud In f-ont o` the ced�r-dad bu�i.�. �. ,
There is a garden rool with plan[ings I��ia ou�. ��,
the pattem of Native basketrv. Inside are beauutu. �
cases I'or ihe display of rhe inbe's art, cr,�i}s an�: _
hISIOR�. �� _�_J __ .
. �Y' � �J
.� � £ i �
'* � i�
,-
- � v j
� • :' 1
/ ` a
'S"'� �''� � u��ii�I��������I��I
� �:�,�
W
> �
_ �..
:- � --
-� 1 ,
� _
� �` �' A�� ,.
OWNERMfO:Puyallu� , . . �'1 �— � . � .� �+x,
� � � _ � i
SQUARE FOOTAGE:23.:-, '�'%� � -�
DATF�FCOMPLerIOnl.:"�,;�- / �
_�����-,P�?'�i-nl�_U� .'J�i -J.lu t � �
RE�.�� Page 164 of 210
wtr h � _ . �z, �� a ; � - I '�' �
. _ ._ _ . _ _ .. .. . . . . ..._._ .. .. .. .. �
I ` �
_ .. . . . _ �.�
-. . . . _ .a.,� , �..
'1_ \ `
. ._ . . _ . . . .._ . � -�� ��� �
��:'`� \
��� �
_ '��� �
- �, �
�
- ..
� _��_� ,,__;�-_�- ,._
_ _- . - , _
- _ � -�;,.�
� -
_ , � � �
_ _ --` - � - �
�-_ .
¢. -- �� -_
. �
,
� . �
.
'�;" � � '�-
. � �..r�
. : .,.° .
_ _ � � � �'
, �� , � �
�.
��,� � � � _ ,� �
�,,.. _ _,,, � _ ;f.1
�=�- �-
�, ,_ " i ' .------
��� _�
--�" 'r`� g _-�--
_ ,� . .
„
� i
. , ., : , , , '�,i.: - .... : . � .. �. . -----.
i
� --.. ���--��..
� � .
---}-,�,I � -��—�.,,,,�,�
_
_�, :. . ,.�"„' ' ���"�trrc.
�_
� � I Y�
.,. -:",^`�. '
[ �
v
u _ , i
I
_' �Alo"�nw— �� ' AI ).� �
+ n � �..,... . . .,. n _ • . av . I�'
-. . _ .. .. , � .y: `rl.. '
i:
RES:E "Pa., . a�' ,
`"'. �.�,
ADNIINISTRATION
`� � � ' �� ADMINISTRATION PLANNING AND DESIGN
� � � ir. , r ! i�', i I,iv� '�e ti e� �..� � vd�iBly Of Cfi2flt Cy(JBS,
� � � _ diti��ne, t ���_hnolog �_,�on, ory h�ll and private office
� � � � � .�us� The �7es��gn ;trateg�es �or ad�nnistrai�ve scaces are changing wi[h
���eryingtechnoiogyandyoungerworkers. Sys[ems(urnicwcop:lonsprovide
�-�r��biliry(they can be moved),changeabiliry(heights are adju�cable fo•peocle
� � � drfferen; heightsl, and a sense of openness cwith dear and ;rarslucenc
I���I� ' , :i �� 3rerialsl. Private cffiees antl Indlvldual cubides a�e sull cornmon_ Howevec
,�„� � . ,� ' e �.r�dea of hoteling-using an office or cubiile or work scace for a few hours
� ' �. .;ay or a week- is becoming popular as well,responding [o changing work
I � I I � �.�� r erems where staff tan and do work away (rom the office, Ne�v ways of
�� _,f-i I ��::;�kinq can �eFlect the alture of an organiza:ion or rs need to change;hat
�
�����I �1 - '�-' � '�.ure. ARC �,s wrrent with this thinklnq and brings Lhese�oncepa [o our
,��s�- � _-:nr� i ,� �,.•a��o�;oaees.
a
�.�' .>� .�1 �-
INTERIOR DESIGN
� � �. .. .-,� .r a�. .. �i��.-. !��r eommon tivead is a balanced
' ' � � �q d �' ,,pra��`�r �h� -�rz�-�t turel a�d the finishes packag2s. As[he
� � �CW d Fo m5 Zr2 ileb�lOPin].SO lre ChP i11dL21Id15 lh3C uvill COmPIPmZni
� � � We (ocus of the use oi daylight�nq and how ligh[iny can augment
. � ��vorF e�v.ronment Te�tures. maierals. and lai provi�e t��e hnishln�
�/'�
ri��a� �.•nl I,-�Ih� � �r�� dPyi�,n �'��n:1rL, i 9�J i �2'g>:
��: �r �/ ,.
gir�s<outs , �- OFFICEBUILDING$
VJ ��"-i"" � -'� Fl.- �as i�i�i ar[ o`hee hwlding � p�nunce. bVe have prov�,aed �ffice
,�
-.,y' rogiamm��g a�sessmexs !or nme rny halls Pon Town;>_nd �Ilensburg,
_ � �a�nm�mish, Klrkland, Mukilteo, Bonney Lake, Richland, Nisqaally, and
- Washougal.We understand inter-deparunental reiationshipsand�he multitude
��� J of ways office buildlnys neecJ tu work for users and vi4[ois. We have had the
- � -���portunity to deslyn sophisncaied meeting and confere�ce areas, from
'�� � �;e(or Indiviclual dep�rtmena to city hall CounCl chambers. We desiqned
�.-� --- - <�c rIW s�uaie foo[ b�u��h?ology offi � bwld��.rn nr Lake�h on �n Se�u!e
' � ����Lul� I I �,, Ptl I iFmr,.�.. � il. i= �d_i ir;3� � I i eiaC2
`�'�'`"v,:": _
- ..a ' SPACEPLANNING
�
� _ - r.ur i i r,p� i ar.ioqe ir .���.,.�. .- 7 ri�°.o� �� _. ,c � _
� � � .�� �•.ave planned and des�gned a 19p,000 syua�e-oot TI tor Bcston Scientihc
(� i �,i; � ,i 270,OOU sUuare foot 71 �or Onyx So(tware. In borh ases the space
{� i
'"� ,���', . :i .�.,ning challenge was tying rogeiher the vanous program etements lnto a
� y '
� . ,esive whole ihat es�aolished an appropnate�maqe for[ne mmpanies and
-.,���,� eibility for furure changes. Fvery business and ayenry r�,incitons diHerently
� � � � � � � '�RC wo�ks dosely wrth dlents.ask'mg iots of q�es:�ons, to decermine [he
���❑tial program functions,the divivons between puolic and private spaces,
- � �mportant coll.borauon requlremenCS and key pianniny reau�remencs
� —..� '�'ch prole� . We�7evelo�soace P'anti 3nd Pro�r i loc�me i[5 tha[help
� Iq��nJe .�-wi•�he� �� �� .,�SUall a �1 ���t�,., �1 �9e;^ ,.i�l�
f
RE�.�� Page 166 of 210
_ ��i � � � __ �- 1 ,__I_
� _ � � � � . .
—— — __ -- ,
AUGUST 2013
SAMMAMISH CITY HALL AND POLICE STATION SAMMAMISH ,WA
Siedona�Jaae,�,eont��e5amma�� I� .a�,eau, �
�his proje�t en�ompasse� a new 4��00 square � "'� '- -- �� ��� - � � °�- �..� � ,.. . .
foot City Hall and Pul�ce Facillty foi the City or ''� „
Sammamish_ Below-gradeparkingsavedstearea �
for the deve�opment oY o[her publlc amenities
induding a larye civic plaza, a branch I��orary oi
the Klny County Llbrary Sys�em, and a lu[ure :
communitycenter.TheCom�rions-apubllcud�b 7�� ��'��
that iz part of the prolect - provides intPr i = .�; . _
areas for vrewing 'm[o the weUand habrta c� _�n 'f ' ,, ' `n'lc �,- ""�'y .
V ` N. . �:� � . I
lawns,and tamily picnic shelters. � i �,,� �'
I � ' � ' �
. � ..� :� i�fii� ��■ �
The building's design is grounded in ih� �'�. . � -� - � � �:�-�,.�.., ..s„`__ �
. - �.�.__- _ -
— — i_ . —
archltecture of the Northwes[ Coundl char�ber�� -- _ s.;_„�,,,,
Iromthelanctwood-dadex;erior[ha[sepzratesii � ' . �-_ _ � � �s
have a dlst
'".,.J.'.��.--r s--:.`;s-�-..�^`—�� " .=�,�a.,•p
rger brlek and wood (orm that house: '^ .�`r^^' - � „ ._,��_ _,._ _ _ . ��- �_,
offices and police. Woed mlumns create a �_i�,��.: � - - - - - - -
/. ,
formality and dravv ones eyes[o a d'atant e t . .� - - �
Seatde Exposed wood structure mmpleie �i -� �y-� _
ConnPCllon lo reqin�a. �r�hite�turP. hr bwl 1��.; �, �j
is LEED Silv �[. rnfi�d. /�"�� � .
ifi� .. �=.�- .�: .
- �� �I
I� �`—'�� -- � ���� ..� .
.
� � .
j �YW:.y � uir�
-[I -f
_„ 1 ��#, � ��.f,`.�� ��' � .
� ,�.Tii.�..,�}.-
� 3 b� � ___��
7i. ^jl '� � Y -
-. L�
�
4
S
S �' /
� �_ V �
� ; b ��'
� � ��, ,
�� - �
� � ��� �
+ q� � s a� _
� °i r,
tp
�
���;�IF..IN GIS2'I �JI'n�.'�i ���� ���I �� � � . - � �
. � ' I .T���� � tlli
SQUF11�t FQ�Tr�l�E:4�,Q����� �� � -
DATE OF COM�LETION�1,��is �� �
,�y_rr.i.r ri � - � v.�,_�
���
RES.E Pa�er1�7 of 210
-
_ , ,�
BIOTECHNOLOGYRESEARCHBUILDING SEATTLE,WA
AR� desiyned a nc"r 3-�dwy �e�eoi;_h dnd
developmen[facilityconsvuc[edo��abrownfield �� -. ,. ..._ .. . . -,. . _.. -.
. . ... , ..-. , ..
si[e in Soa[h Lake Union. The b�ilding includrs � � � "��-"�.`� . ��
97,000 squaie feet of tenant space,80�000 square - ;,
s ace� alonq the ma�� s[ree� d`t nd a ro�i r: � ' � � _
P . . S�parate �a , . . .. _ - . _—. —_ .,
teeraae over ooki iy La ed U��o'�avace thr ,ur�-. � � ��;. '��&9 1 �, ,����
and - rovide amenuues o d uaa empl� ee. �1n � - " _
expedl[ed GU�M comn�t equrted a 3 pli�;c� '�f .w�,c( � � - - --
permil orocess. � �� � ����'r �
`� "` �gIC` �� �
` � , k
�
The architec[ure ms onds to tn� �onl et wilh ° � �
p � �, � . , � ��v
design YeaCUres thai are abs race I i�om th� * ""'- �� - �
.t ���
manCime locadon. A Censle faor��,�"'sail p ovve� �"TF'=+S�n, - �.+
a co�ered entry ��hat drains r,�inwa[er ❑�n .a � - ` .�. - -
2-slorywarerteawre-Conensieelsldings�oae�r � `�__,
the metal hulls of old boacs and sh�ps and n,in�_ � . .
- �:r�
through the 2-story lobby.Walkroff graces fonn a ��''-ij���•' �- .i��-��' ��
"dock"over the Cer:azzo Fcoi�ng, The bu Iding Is , ��' - _ , _ .
LEED Gold certihea � ;
' �� \
� �\ ...u�.
1.- �
! � , � ^'� ��
�-a, �' '� \ ' ��
"�„�+� Vi
�«�t�y ,� ��' � ' � �� w ,:, � �1P j.
!�� � ` 1 i
:• ��i�e�i / ' j� r� � �1 I .
`.���y �ta ',�i *�;.�� �i
.;,"' � -+w � .�l .. �� !� �--
�w__i u�.:.
.
'��, - �.
T � --��,..`,— _F_. ,,___ , �
�.. ��
---� �
i
7� � � .
0'._'. .�
OWNERINFO�.Alexanch�c �I� �, .,
SQUARe FOOTAGE: 17%,pai),`
DAiE OF COMPLETiOM'J i�' �
.. _.._..�, - . . . . .
���1;T=1.li_ �l^I , 'Si� . . .'�.!l� _. ,..,...— - � ��1 �t.":'�.�:��
RE�.�� Page 168 of 210
ADi�1�Ni�T�'9T��1�I =r��'F�S���G��A� ��F'J���;;� A �'� i;i��TER
_—_ .
AUGUST?013�
MUKILTEOCITYHALL "IUKILTEO ','��-
Tnr Ia,900 iii i.a�oo; �::_23tes a ph �� � �' � J.:�. ` '� . . "r'�� •
�rtizeni to ss ly aciezs�rty�t_ttand dzFarrm.�rr�. � ' a� �
�nd �nrerface w�[h ihe MukJ�eo �iryCo���il II,� � � �1 , ,
�ity hall admi istrarive of'ices and public council �- ��` �`
chambers are mnneaed by an e2ntral dayllgh� � -.�„�'�', W _, �` �
atrium which prov�des pub6c overFlow saace f�or _ �'
chamber;and q�eulnq area For o�b���c��nte�act�n� � �. �
wi[h eiCV Je • . ,. ,"-.- � '� •�
�;'., . .__ +._r��... � ..�t,. � _� � - __
effor[s in,, ..: �. ��. :... , ; � _ ' , , � -- __ - _
within the �. �i- � =- �� [ �,[ N
u .. .
Awarded L��L �,1�7 � � � � _, [ P il I��a � �� �
- � � 1' ���1 �' ��,�� f �
utllizes rl,n cl��,,�i i , ,�,�,la - � � � � � �
elemen[s �ndud�na Ihe narro�e e.i, . � ,.� � � �4�!�' •;"��
building(erm,geothermal p�ping for heat� • ��� . ;-�� 1 " �
b�orete�Gon swales a�d a�.n qarc i, . � T.,�g-=��'*�i•:^�t_.' _ �,.� �
veyeta[ed rool ove�coune��.���i.9r�oer;. �
� ��r1¢, r. �
f_� - .'y'���.:�
. _.
,r -
���
� t-�w�_ �� � ��. �.
�'.,, � �:w ,_•-�.+' _ ���� -
, '��. �'r� , � � .
; �� � �_ .
,:
MUKIL7E0 .:,of �. .
�Cr['Y HAI3. 1•y�..,s. ."r�E.' � ���\
�� .. , ��Y'.r_ _.v.�� . .
'�,.'_. .. _ . '�- �::�- .
,. �` -_. .. � � .
I
�v�'
� ,� �
cr a-�� �6 ,C �r ' �
- a�i �i » � ,, ,� � �
u � — _
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 19,d r�� - "�� � ' � � � � � �
''� ''�r,� I i I - -_ k ' ,
DAT�OF COMPL"tT10M.':� �� - � , � �
- -- - - � . • �� � ' y—
.' I� -_ �I _ . . . i,�..__.. ��- �! .�
RES.E Pa�e 1�69 of 210
ADMINISTRATION
COWLITZ REGIONAL CONFERENCE CENTER CO��,�l'_ITZ,WA
r�.,a ,...,. ._ �_ente� �_ a �aoou �,a�a�e ... . -- -- � -
renowoon and addiuon to a 1950s concre�.- . _ . ,
armory. TMs reg�onal conferen�e center locaie�.�.
on [he Cowli¢ County Fa�rgrounds in Longv�e�.. � _ �,
Washingron, serves communiry, county (a�r, a�����. �r.
growing con(erence and irade center neea�. n,: �. � ��
regionalcenrecanimportan�designfean�rz�<i�,-. � - -
flexlbleplunlayourandcommerrialkitch nwhi^- � �
allow ihe bullding to be use�i slmultzneou.�e 3 � - � � �� �� •
banquet hall, exhibftion space, and o ven�e ic�.� � � �� , — .� ��„
communitv3ndbuslnrssrneei�nqc�i �ll>ite,. - � � y� �
� ( 1�.
c
_ �'-
—�
i-_=�`` _'�n9�.
i��
�� �����
��s i�,
�;ii� � 1 :� �,
�-y �
�;_ � �.—
�� �.r i
,-�— � �`
b _ ' —� �
�. 1� �;� �
���� � �
ye'
OWNERINFO:COOVIiI<'�'�.c� . . � � _ . �':'� r
r ra r cA r
sQUnaEFOOTn�F:ao.�,��� ' -,---�+iM�.i'." ' `�.
_ -�: r. �� �� �
�
DATE OF COMPLETiON..� ��� � �
� �V4R.� r )^I �.li� _ � � . . .
RE�.�� Page 170 of 210
.�r�° M�` r 'r f ! ��� /:� � . . �
r " 11M � i! / �
�4'�
.. \ � ' . - ,� .
_ " --�
�
_ ^ _ I � a. ,d�
! ..� ,� .
1� _ L • '�' �1 '. .� ., �: *�:ri��t
�� -:
, .
: .
� ,. _.. , �
' i - ' 7 .:.� ��.T11' '
� ,_"
�-,. �f �
���� � � ,
" ��
I �;
�
.
�
� . � ,;�
' � �
.�� � � �i ( �
l a+ —_�1 , �+�` `�
� � G W
� �
na y e11 � �1
.. � _ . _ •� T�
1 /
j
- R�� ,'r,� + ��p �
�
�.
� . - �; - 1 , . . �'�"" � �
. � ._.
.
� , - -
�--_ �
,
_ . . „ _ .
.: . ��� � � s
4
, �
. ^ _
� r
. � �, � � ,�
- � � :., ,.
� � �. ,
. �. r
,, . _, - i�
_ , _.. ; _ ,- ,.
� .
` -- - _ _ _
,V �
� � �
; �
�t
;._ _. � �
l
�,
° • Page 171 of 210
;
MEDICAL AND LABORATORY
�¢� ' � MEDICAL&LABORATORY FACILITIES
iq , ..
" �"` �� ` � � g n technoloqy research and
- � A ordaole �e�lth�are, b�otechnolo v informaoo
� —� _
� c1i An�Cnnq an ��qi �suve��ss �7a nqoirlives�nnewwavsnearlyevery
� � _ cvelopment all are mp�cs ih�tare atFecu
---�� � � � oprare forprojeas like ihese,
� _ ihi �2te�hnul ��m�c�aiJ��oi, ,y��
�� I � �Q �
� �, ■�- � = MEDICALCENTERS
f, � ' f'
__ — eFJ�,��-----_�. __�� Ve reivs a.Ni 3 � ar� o i�al�,h -ar rPC�ie�xe ur.a:=, ��ns[itucnnai and
� ' � z �urrpro5-Yiea':hp*ov�� rs.Amung�urdenuarer'� Jnivers-tyofWashiiigton
�-��`�,__.,_ �� ' � '�edica'�Cen�ecHnrbnr�eNMeuical�em2rand5em�e�hd�irensHOSpit�I.We
� h�ve wc�rked widi[he Polydlnic,ihe larges[mulii-specialry dinic In[he Seattle
I� � � �rea.since the early 1980s. We have desiqned for cominuniry-based providers
� �r, i i uding theCoun�ry DoUOrCommunlly Heal[h Center,Seattle Indlan�iealih
'Ay_ � `,�� �ra,and �he Cente�or 4uman �evelopment. We have long believed iha�
ti �_�d,affordableh?al[h aielsanlnp�itantsocialgoala�dwoikwithdientsto
�� � � �.� -��n�n�izems�siohelpmiked�lsmoreeaslyadileved.
� J ��� OCCUPIED MEDICAL CENTERS
',Le have des�gned prol�cCS In occupied medic�l bulldings,working dosely wi;h
_ �� � ,�ff and admin�s[rat�on ro assure patlen�mmfort and safe�y,and �o minlmize
.. a�uptions to patiert seroice. Ow design tiocuments address wayhnding,
- �� onstruction laydown areas and Grculauon, bulld�ng system sh�rvdowns and
hanqeoverz, dust and noisz mn;rol, and effects on others evho are beside,
� . �o�e and below die areas In whlch we are working, Some of��hese projects
�� � -�;.�e been re'sa�ively slmple where we neecled to only cons�der Impatts to
,�. � �� �ra�,a�ent uses;others have been much more complex. For the Installation of a
r :'. �. r-. .�. � ..�.� . . .
�� ��_� N„v 3-Tesla MRI for Harborview Medlcal Centerr an exishng MRI and adjacen[
�I � Sean Sul[e had [o remaln operaCional. A major renovaGOn to a dinic �n
��,ntVernon recuired a ter-iporary[unnel toyet patlents from w�l[ing�ooms
�_'���e spaces. N/e have lear�ed !hal earlv mmmunicat�on w�th die'ns and
� r...J� i iivr-.fhinkinry 1� '�LS�.USS o �-,arc kCy �prOjc`a c,;rcess.
LABORATORY RESEARCH FACIIITIES
a-�oi� 1 -��q�� i I - 9L.in ELi2nviro�m ��G.dierrstr�l,qp�,.dnd
�
a ��� � � Pn.�m �'.o n w ��lof hic �zr educaunn � well a°pMehoLOmv a�d urinalysls
a
�°����� labs Inr m2aical offices and dinics. We recently mmpleted a le�[illry dinic
� _ -� '.' ;ha[mc���deci media preparauon,embrvologv,and andrgogv/endocrinoloyv
�� _�. •. . 'il . `Vc i i I r�end fn i� I,,,. �es ni ai;�.�, �I dnd �on�k. _h iien*� :o
♦
� e✓el,;�;e^i i ��I�acr �� � �i� usrr ini in,ie� >
�� � � DENTAL OFFICES
�� . ] i h'd'Ih 3 '^Ik i� I i �r�:d lilll�s 10� L`l� il� I;ilY��l �i9.1"u1J1011
a��i nr�yhb� ' od heal h �ii,. Ow lar�e>[deni3l �,io��u- �ic �en�er For
' �_ _ � Ped�auic Den[a[ry at [he Universiry o(Washington - is a parmered projec[
� be[ween the Unlvers�ry and Children's Hospital[hat indudes de�tal ope•a[ories
. . and surglca! sultes Yor rese�rch, «alning antl patient care. Il had � GC/CM
- con.rac� s�rua�r� that mciuded tl�e dienL the mntraaor, t�e aes�gn ream
. m udinq a denr�l deslgn consultanU and den[al eqwpr�entmanufa�wrers.
n. �� � �ivedri i. lr �lyilllf ���c�'1 Y�i hel_Inv. . nr.�., rle�.lm
v�':i,:. ,�b � _ „ , . i.� . . .� I . .
RE�.�� Page 172 of 210
i _ ,_.- ._ �.- ' _� .�_ ' _ _ _ . . . � '�� I�� TLI�;
�., f r. ,i� . �, . . . ;', � , •.
. ..—_ ___.. _.....
AUGUST 201 a
BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH BUILDING ,EATTLE,WA
AR'� desiqned a ncsv ;-sLON r�=sea�ch a�a
developmene faciliry consttuc[ed on a brownneld � '� �� � , -� ��� , - �
s[e In Sou�7 Lake Unron. The building Induoes � - —•"� -."- �
9�,000 square fee�oF[enan� cpace,SOU00 �uar? " - - — � . ;;
D
spzcps along henmalnrcnreet ar[iw[eah� � � .fl�, Ytl�, _ [ _■' ` �.
Pee[ of below- rade p g,
9
� ` 1 �:
and rovldt amen[ities to atc�ct em �yP �,- � ' �� C��""
expedited GUCM mn.ra�i r-� w= - — -- - �
�i - d � h:a- . [r!' ��I .� � �--
permit pracess � : , �AP�►*r� � ���
� �" �� �
Th2 ofChlCe� I.:e r25pn�i�; l0 Lh? 1 Cz v J'� "" '����� �� � � � a'j����� �
design t'�at��es U�at 3�r abstrane i � ni i' ,_ i � "'�'�. z � �
mari[ime locanon. A [en Ile `abrlc "s�il ar� � I�; ���t�y�°— — ��� _ �
a mvered en[ry that drains rainwa[ei u �, ? � ..�,�,` _
2-srory warer�eature.Corten steel>Iding su� . , --� ��
.. '�'e-=�.. - � _ ,.
[he metal huCs of old boats and shlps and �s,r�_. _ - �
[hrouyh the 2-siory lobby.Walk-off grates lorm a "'�'� �"'
�
IC.%S"
"doce"over the rerra�o Floorinq. The buflding , . - ` - �_ -. , . ,_ ._,,,
LEED Gold cercified. �� �
� \\
�. �='1 I '�F�_ .
' � � �� ���.. .
I �
1 '� � rl _ \� '
1 ' � �
r � � ` ,
.��� � � V�� : • , i `- I "i } � Rt,
:��� • r��!� � �� �'''A � � r �� i .
��� �, ''''�11�'�� �+ � �,� @K���1 ; �1
�..� � yy _�, � � L' _
T . �' h.��, L:'.
�Y.ua
-il.�. ��J..:`�� .r�
`.:�=.... ' .. ..
�! �.._.,.� �. .
IyI; �, � ��
I i J E�
n{u
� �� ' � ..
'Ri .. . ��.�
�WNE2INF�:P.�2Xdfll�fl,l
�_"�,_
SQ�ARE FOOTA�iE:�77,O1}C 51 y��
_'^I..F,.. �
DATEUFCOMPLtTI0�LJ0i0 - � ��
_
lif �" 1I
, „a; .,�� r�i._����� - �-,�,�, _.,m.__ -� �.
RES.E Pa�e 1�/3 of 210
� ��`,t�P �Il.il_>"„� F��.., ,;
UW CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY SEATTLE ,WA
�'he�en�ei fo� pedia�.��� U ti��s[ry �s a pa��neish�,;. �: '. . _ _- �^
betoveen [he University o�Washingmn Schoo� c� —"—� - �
D�m[is[ry and Childrens Flosp�[al ana f eq�ona . �■ i`�.. �'
t �esu �� �0:.: • `r . �
V�edical Cen[er wirh the qwl oY pm� hn : -,� ^=��� !` _ �■'- �°r`� �
prehenslve oral health services �o ped�,u .� _ �- ' �� �
�
pabenrs, A model Yor pedla<<ic clen�al ai i-- ' �
28,000 sq�are fnot adaptive reuse ol the N� -, ��� Li �� i � . . � � �y� �� �
Administration Building, buJ[ in 1936 t�,�._�.� 1lS� r y A ;.;i,. ���� �� �� � ��
s[a[e-of-[he-ar� dentai dlnlcal, rese�r�� i �: ' �' � + -1 a � � �,
[ralning facilitles In an nlsronc bwlding on �.�. � � p ,��,. ��. � � ��=� �
ARC worked with the S�a[e Nlsmric Preser�a���;�- W� �:.'- � �- �, ��- - '�- ' :'�
Otfice �o mee[ hls[oric reauiremenis an�' q��� � y''^ ,��� � �� � .�`�Q�� � �
theirapprovalforthedesign. -_o _
,,�
Uniq�ie ro [his project were me challenae�: oi � ' "�'� "-� ' -� - - .
revlralizing a building [ha� had sai derella io��0 �;-"�
years, When an undercround spring under t'�e � ,� . .. - - -- � - - �
bulldl�g was dlscovered,the deslgn team createu .•
a channel ro allow wate�to Flow into[he ouildinq �
and ba.k o�t Low tloor-to-Floor dimensions � `^?-`�`� ' �/� . .
' � ,. ,
requ�red careiul coord�,nauon ol me��ani�al ancl �s� �
electrical systems. ARC worked closely wi�n ��he � — � -� . _,. .� -
� � `�/ 0 .
�ontractor in BIM for final piping layou�s to�nsur., �
all rystea�s ht wt[h�n thc exisLnq sCUCwrc ...
'�� �y � �
u,� r � � +�
L � ` = � �
�- ���-
��
.._,_-,__.._����.'*� ,
i--'l .A.�n�r
.
� �,����' S `� {
� � � � ���� ,. ' � R
� i �. �� � �� .���f� �
�._ t�� `_� b� _ ��
� ��- . = J'11'-'Ir ' ��, � '—�t•
iIWVFF IN �1 Il,li �2'S�f i 7���3s'li'1qi0� �F --` !4!^ 1 " � �
�, ✓
SQUAREFpOTAGE�.28,000st ��� ���� � ��� ��� -� ,
Is • ,�� �'+�Y n _ �:.. .
� Fl � i
DATF OF COMoLE"IO�h 2019 '
i�lSr=:I fl �5T � ' I 1'r, � �f�l�� �� _� '-"�-.
RE�.�� Page 174 of 210
MEDICAL AND LABORATORY PROF�SSIC�NAL SERVI�ES/A&E ROSTER
-_ _ .. AUGUSi%u� 3
POLYCLINIC- MULTIPLE SITES SEATTLE,WA
NORTHGATE FAMILY PRACTICE -- _— �� -- ` "`
Tn 4 oly�i n N �iIhGPLe �i i � � I iu� �P���
r� °i a Li Ih dnd h ul ��,ii nn� . `r . � � �� � �
��,�. . .� . ._ ..,... r ...-.�--M�'�r.'� �n.,�
paue^ts and staff. The <200�syu��e too� [ena �! � � '- '�� � � -�"" - �� #
�mprovementlsmmprlsetlofexamandorocedure �� � � � � � _
rooms, offic?s, laboratory, and medical iec,,rds. � �� !� �
In[egr�'� to Che practice �s dermatoloyv urolog� �� ,�•
and internal medlcine. The suites are o�ganl�ed `� �'�I
with nurse staCion areas seroing exam rooms. �"°'r — � -'a�
pa[ient needs, �nd for doc[or dlctanons F��ea ���
with a chalienging schedule,ARC worked �lo,�= , � ��,��
with L�e conir,aa0� In a "�i�siqn bulld" mode '.: '��"=4�
�inq t7e��ol��t n on �i��nd���n hwi„�i. ,
____--�
FAMILYPRACTICE,DOWNTOWN - -
The F�lydirnc's lamlly prac[ice an� aei�iiato�oy,�
dlNC creates an�nvi�ing envronmen;for pauen�:
and sraff;n down.own Seaule The �9,000-square- , ,! �„
(oot lenanl Improvemeo[ is mmpnsed of exai*� ' � �
���
and procedure rooms, offices, labordeory, and � R ��,�
dlagnos.ic areas. The suites are organlzecl w�tP� �� ��
nurse sta[ion areas serviny as � °front door" for - �
overseeing patient needs and a "back doo/' io� � � _ . . �
semi-privare doctor di��:atior. and staff sia��.ons. ,� �i
Faced with a challenginy Floor-taFlooi dearanc.. � � � � '• �
AR�and th design team inregrared mechzrnca� _� °��� �
an� electr� �I nsem� � io� i e�•ir�om ���.,_ � -, _ �. '�� �-
3c�_��eUeso ��:ro�i li i �i ���rrii
CARDIOLOGY PRACTICE,JAMES TOWER
!h� Polti�hni,� :aiC�'nqo [;�ar . ��aie�,
a waiat inviinq �,�i�_ 31r� �=nc�� �ine��i I:
patie�[s and s[afi- ihe io,000-square-foot �ena»�,
improvemen� is mmpdsed of exam, procedure. - _,
and nudear medicin=_ rooros physaan office�. -�. -
and laboralory an�i medlcal records The w�e �� ' ,, i� .,,���;,� �
organlred vvld� nurse s a�ion areai sereinq ds s � _ ��
"cheek our"for overseeing pailen�s re-S�hedulmn � _
ne?ds. A pnone Criage zrea Is provided a[ the � I� �
lobbv for seml-pr�vate docter consult�iiiun. Face��� �
wl�h Lhe need [o re-structure part o�the buildin:�� 1
ro zuoport �he nudear medicine mach�ne AR��� �, � , ���
� k�d cl� I ;'� '7 �� a-'.ar� I d�.rv. i � . ,
_. ..,, .. .� . �, . � .. �. . .
RES.E Pa�er1�75 of 210
MEDICAL AND LAD�)�ATO��'v
PRIVATE PRACTICE CLINICS
� � fiE RENTON,WA - " —���--- -� �
I LI U A �
� 5?� G 1 s V�=C i t h' . - � � � �
,, .r�' � ,'.�, rt od � � i� �� '. ��
Iacn mwt ie neailn �nauenges, Anls de>r;�� _ , - � �> _
for Fidelis' first diric in Che Pacific Ncrthwesr f �
creares a wa�m contemporary design and ha�� _
served as a modei for their future dinics. The � � .
simple organization of uses makes wa��inding fci �J'�- � '
senlors easy and mee�s the produa�viry needs u' ��� •1� ���y� �
�
today's healthcare rystem. The projec[ was fas�, �1h .
tracked wnh only 4 months be[ween beqinn��rn� I( .��� - -
of design an�i oaupaney. ARC was respon,�t��„- �i'��I��' „
for architectural devgn and guidance on Inte��„�
design,indudinq furnilure selec[ion.
SAGE MEDICINE, BELLEVUE,WA - " �� ��i'ti,,1;1'" '. .
�d�- Nlaih ini r� d nivd i'i�li�_ wh�i � poli2nC — - � ��
i� � �c niliu�polhl[ Cn . l��e�rdpu _ ndSSaC'Ir .. �� . . - —` �
<icuoc,ncwi aid pri s� I lh�idp� �5 wF�� - jj �
as na[ural supplementy and mediuney Thc . . - ��
Easrein inFluenced cesign provides a seCt�ny " -!� ' � _�'. �
tha[ mmplimenls th� naluropatic approach •.� ���� �� . �
medlcine Smple de[a�llny and �oims helped : - � � � � �
mntrol msts and allowed the dient and his Id��u�. � �� `" .,� �-' '�N�111� ,
ro ac[as yeneral contraaoi and to bulld much .�� 5 i ����
[heiliniC � ' ���'�"w7l"_�',�� .
� ������
i �i?+�,w.:iJ�
POMAFERTILITY,KIRKLAND WA �� ' --- '- � '-� ' -'�—
,. _ r i..�.i . .�. i�. ��- ` � �� ' ' ,I
� .., .,., i �,_ . i ���..t .i �..�,
SpdC2 i0' d UdiiPllFlC�l@feU (JLp,�tCB ,-. � , - ��
s[rives [o [akes the mys[ery ou[ o� �ne�� . - ' . -
The orojen, aporoximateiy 6,000 square f � � � � I
new consuuclion, wilhi� shell space is o� ��� � �I�,�
camous o(Eveigreen Health in K�rkland N�+ ' - �O 6 �
proqram indudes mmprehensive dia��nos��.��c -.���.� � _ }�'
[rea[ment servlces throuyh In Vit�ro Fer[���,�. �� -_ . �
(a dean lab) and Androloyy/ Endo[rino ���.
the ioe ,i3ndards while oromounq a r�, �� - -- � �
>>,1 fere [esUngl. As zxpeaed (or a de, � .�
p j ct meet�s stnct znvironmentai�i�r m
ormon'I , r.� i � , . .�
�1�� . i a i.� . � com�ng spa�e 6_�1._�h':J.1. _..._ 1!��a.�.._..'a '". ..-` ---
RE�.�� Page 176 of 210
�` / � .�,- �
�, , - � � �r , .
�. i� � ��
.;
; � ; � ;�;;�
� / �
\ g�,._._ �3_� � . '�-, ...,�4;'�� _ -' ��� 'ul a ,
� � �' � "•a.-.
� \ ' • �'. �.i;-
� ' •
' .k , -.in ... �. , �_
1 � .. ..� . . . ,..., '., �:`. .ri . �
t ,c!��
� \.` __. _ t� . . . � •+
„� ��.. �: . , _'�.. . ... .'`+`a..y - .s 1 7����r� i. .
� �� . . '�,. � � )'� <.
�� . . . p� �''
\ t ' • • ' •
�\ h
� � d�
-. . . . . .. ..� . ... . '
� _ �' ' �� `�' • �� �?I '� �
� `
� ` � '
\ / � �, 4
,a�, aC� � �t�,;
` � �
�� �� ���,
� \\�-�.� � i � I P�' .. �. � . '
`.�` `` �\ .. ^r ' 'i
� �=_ � �- ` t`�
`� _ , � � ; .
� ,� - - , ��
�s j \ � � �
�,�
��
�'� � � ;� �,
� ' -� _ ' �
n . `�ti�� '�+. �. P.
T�� `� .f ��/� .
% .� � x:
_ _
� : `�:-
. ,_ t;
_ � , .
._ , _
�. � i� �— � .�•� �
+ r���r. !j
. •c�. � x�!�..
a � - . J-`� ; �Y'�`1�• I
., �� � � �I .9�-� ,��`�G. ''���'�7 ,'
''' � ,�. . . ,. �, . ,
' �. + � ' � '� I �� , �� �. ° , ri
� ,� � .
�
. �u '� � � r -_ ����
��i. _ .yi. .. ,•�� � �� �J�� °
��� —''��� , ���,��� � � ,
. ,_ .
� x ;, a
, (�� ;
n �f ;,�i ��� i
_ � �i � � � ,��
� .
'�"',����,�, _ w �� � � ,i
RES.E , � � Mr ��" �`� � s , ` � , �.,
�,, � �ti � � iJ
. s+ � ?�'��.�.�;�. ._"-, �R�i:�:ss�� `�� ��v_4n � x� `i�t�'i. _ ' Ik. � f II
tDUCATlO�I Fq�IUTIES
� EDUCATION FACILITIES
- - CHILLDCARE
�+'� � Frlychdohooder:��caucn�� �^��poriaii �nl d�en��;,�akngvnriieti°�ioievelo:
. w s�ccessful�ente�s for childreo and iamdies. �midcare desrgn req�.�res careiul auenuon
6 �. � to�all the requirements of Head Sia�i�nd the local Depa«ment o(Health. ANCwill work
*- w�h ownP� i� develop nellgh;ful sp�ces t'hat meet codes and are easy [o use and
' r i���� i i�-U��i�m�i z,chlldren,and rhelr[eachea.
__� M..
_ � � �. HIGHEREDUCATION
_ . -��� _�I<.,h 3 °xiens�ve esperienCe worlcing wlih hlgher eduCatlon inSCitu[ions.We have
�� � ��,��neo �,�e�ral ncsv tuiidings znd many�enovatlons and uogrades(or the students
. i�izl iacul[v �t WSU, UW, and Seat[le Unlversiry. Prlonry one is working around [he
j�ademlc calendar,ensuring adherancz to sehenules from des�yn through const�rucUon.
t._. �econdary, Is working around occupied bulldings Clear docwnentation Is criticai �n
; yL�i:r �efining coniractor procedures for uiiUry�ross-overs,containmenr or dust and noise,
� -, .i �nc1 identify�❑g lay-down spaces[o malntain safety foi s[aff and students,
a �� � ���n � FANLTY OFfICES
�Vtany high�er educa[ion prolecrs require renova[ioe otfaculry offices for accommodaring
-sCdi�ional faculry cr re-�onfiq,rina ottices (o� modem technology and methods of
._+�� .,;ea�ch and co�'�a�orailon.
a-F-
l
' CLASSROOMS AND LECTURE HALLS
� � - � i �z. ed��i .�� ieyuu 1�� ���c✓u cl �rooms and lecwre halls wlth a wide range
� t . � i �h�iolou� eaend�nu >> �ir J 4��un�n� and ad'lacen� spaces available. ARC
� � �� ' � niei"�anJ, ih� i-chnulo�a� �nJ wo�ks w��l v�e best iT, AV, anci acoustic consultants
- - -�- " ��- ro e��su�e area� �paces ma�. >ound good a�d a�e easv to use by faculty and vlsiC�.nu
.�.
iea�rerz
,.i��:
/ � `y � ,
., Childcareprojectsindude:
�, ��� �, ,l, -amp Eastei Seals
r � ��„quarri sh Earlv Leaminq Center
- . =Nderal Way Head S�art
� - -- -° --.��-- .
� � .. New Holly Cainmuni[y�arly Learning Center
S-'�� . SpringwoodYouthCen[ei
' � •
� , KentFartilvCen�er
� ��� . L.�eev Cni'� �carz Cen[er
�
� T � a� Higher Education piojects indude:
� � � 1 Nnrlh e -1 Agiiw'Wril ReSearch Extension Cen[er
�� � �d ' ^
le I!n��r _ iv Rianna HIUES Remodel
� �Y �ti� � ,ip��enter ror P�=dia[ric Den[is[ry
� f
'� �'� r _ JW Communicatlons Bwlding Renovation
. +�.� * p • i iYV Digl[al Ar[s
I ���. � .� !i6V iCA GolfTraining and Oubhousa
' - � i",;V NIRI SWdy
�' � � - i��^/Music Building Nlinor Improvemen[s
� µ � � '�
.�„ � .;.,� i N Pathologv Re[ocation Prog2mming
�
�,,.� ��N Sand Foinl Ulihdor
0..�✓ �� �� ��'�m't'i il ^_g ii�p �i ii..urvr,,,.'ei ie�lin�lo�.; IJT�ii°g
_ i_ ii. . - �,�. ,'.�.I i , , . .
RE�.�� Page 178 of 210
� AUGUST2C13
KENT FAMILY�ENTER kENT,WA
�. ���a, , _ . , - ,c.�.-y is wi , � -;-. _ _
Kiny Couni.o Ho!ising Autiioriry's Birch ���-� - - • - �
ApdrtmC�fll COfilplPx. Th2 2itory,20,400 sl F��ri�
Cen[er Is a new bufld�ng serving Nead Sta�t ��°�. � ��
family services sucn as WIC - � . �_�
The facillry Is designed to maxlmize dayii i � ����, � � _- ��� � _
and visual connections belween the clas " - - �
t � � i - .....
and the in[erior 'wurtyard', There are � � ;� e
mee�ing spaces which encourage inierv -. .I _ .,I �
between parents and teachers. The extern � � . — �
areas prov�de a variet� o� inte27ive p i , � I ���� � � - ' p
connea�ons to i7e :meno� 4RC wo�ke , � r ��� � � .� ���'� ti;
wun I M �
several aru in �i_at� hiullin� el ii�ni i ;, �, �� � � �� �� 17 ,� p; .@# �"'"
w0uld2nh i i_ [hil ' .n 3���. :i i �„ '�.� ' p °d�llf��._ '-� . J
�.�nlil�-�-.—`` �y
�'i;�..,�al>._. . � _ -a .�-V�
i� � �
--s— --�_____��
� ;� �-� �.
�� `i i� ■ rt � ._._ - �
� h � Y
►�� ' �,�d`kw f �� �
�i ►�; '1� � , �r .�
� .
� : �:�� ��! rQ �_
� - �y �♦ . .
_ �- � ,°Ti �
a _ ,":' ��_ . �+,
�� { � \ } Y_ • �� � -�
�� � � , � ., �
, . . ,. _ .~ .:' "
_ � � � 1
�� - / � �
� � ��� _I' ; !�
,
p I
• ,: �" i� � � �
I�: ■ ' " G
�� �,.s'� _ '�' I R
J:VM'R ���uK.����o�.v� .c;,i�7 � , i.,,.,.,. -�� _ , i
� �
SQUARE FOOTAGE:20,400 si � '
�� ..:� � �`��.
�
DATE OF COMPLETION:2004 �— '
�' "...!. . I _ . ; � , �-;�
RES.E PagerlS9 of 210
SUQUAMISH TRIBE EARLY LEARNING CENTER =_iQUAMISH ,WA
Ihr I I.�00 �i�,ue;oul ti v �1n�'t] � n � � � i�-+ � .; �
JesiGned io fold inlo lhe landscape an� n� i �� ; .r,�� � � ��
around [he exteriur play areas The Ceni, ,. ' � � �'� >.;,� .� � ' � ���r ,�,
eight dassrooms and a commons for�ndo� �, ' �'�,+^,�. � <, � ?�' -� �, �;`�r e '„'�.� �y° �^�.
socialevenrs,andparentmeetings. ��y'�� �"' y'��.,',��'�A'� � � "�,Yt i '"'° ,�yr
1...-� -,pU. ��;W r �' i r t�-�»..�:
Filled wlth nawral Ilght, the Cenrei tai i � �. . '�..a'r 'II� -_ "�,.s,.c : � '� ���` � X ?t
open mmmunication between children. pa��-�-�. --.
teachers, and staff. All dass�ooms have � . j ��_. ,�_�� �� °° ._
daylighting and ope!able windows for fe � . ,i i.iir�'�5*S," �, 1 �. :` - -_; —�'
A central hallway prov�de� Pasv access he -_ - �',�'�' ii�� .i"1=.1� _ ,��"!-
�
.. ti . � �j+�.�. ��. r
dassrooms and th� ��a i � ;�a i - � z, � �,�i �, � �� , , � r� € ,�
(or Che chdclran �-ri , 3, � ��
��' ;� �,�:�,�' .
E . .•�.` ,ic�'�
� - ��I' _. ... ._ . i. �
� ' f �
�� ' �' !' �
�. � G' : /(
q �i - �
1.
y �
, ������;� � �� �
�� t� ;�; � �
:.+ �:�. i � � � ���-�: - � � �
i x�
� �:�x� � �
- , _�: _ ._J�i .,,; �
. _ ` ..�
_ �—.-I . .
►��'i��.�',�� _�..� .� �h�
�'��''� �n�
�,r� � ��':�i � � r 4—
._�� � r'� i-*,�--�—=� . _r
,
� '; —� ������ ��� _ - �• )
" - y��� ,�^. ����"�. _ 1� � �'�'.
u��vvE;�Nro s�.,�:�a,-,. �7� - .� r� � ,�� , '�1
r _ _� _ �
SQUAREFOOTAGEi'�.5- + _ ~
DATE Of COMPLETIOnI.:: � � � f`
i��� ��
�\� �
. . .i . , . �� � ei� \�14���• , �
RE�.E C Page 180 of 210
EDUCATION FA�Ii_ITIES PROFESSIQNAL SFhVICES/A& E FOSTER
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH �VIT VERNON �ti'4
'h�s IS.OUn tiqi:are ion $�3 m�ll�o� lab�i a�y ���" 'R ' �"� . .
fac�liry provides resear�h io suppor� [he i rdti �
of the Universiry and wesCem W�sh�n4 �Y, •.
agncultural communiN. The buildmg con.�n, '
a variety of labora[ory sp�ces Indud���r� ._ �
Process�ng and Field Horticulwre; F-�3 an:i '- -
Vegetabi� Hor[iculwre: Vegetable �nd , .I,
Parholagy: Water QualDy; and Enromol�qy �
150 -seaY multi-purpose roam aecommou�.N�. . �1�,
v�deo conferencing, med�a projea�on �n��� � i � � �
demonzaaPion K[chen suppor�ing ihe ne��6 ai � � � `� , A
i
4
research scienTis[s as well as [he yrelle �hj (� �, ryr �,�,-y_�, °� `3p a� •�,�,� w ��� �'� �.
Valley community. Gre?nhouses and o��dnr.r� ' ��,..�.��r��.��,�����i�� � b
spaces complete�he res?ar�h fadllry_ "
r � ... .�. . „_ . _ _ --.
� ,.
�� . . .. - ��!'
'�r r . �� ._
I �. � �� �
'. �. �.r . � ---- �� �
�� � .t a
1 'I -..Q
,
�
. �, , �
�Y � .
� �
r o �'� � � ���� '` �"'"".�
„ N. .
.��u ---
f� � �.
�_
�` �----
,_: , ....
�NSVEZ��NF � V�s���iu'�m�i � eLinia-�;u,; � ,�ylk ,
; _
SQUARE FU�TA�E: I S.Oi.�'_� I : � - � li
_ mi I
DATE OF COMPLETIGN�._7!'a� �,',,,y-_,_ .,
�S ' V'
,..i'�f�TF.i.r. ri i�l �.)S� : i i ���,�., ..
RES.E Pa�er1�1 of 210
-� - - ,r _, . - - -T =-
UNIVERSITYOF WASHINGTON MULTIPLE PROJECTS SEATT�J- ,�;';?
ARC ha; worked vvith UniversiN ol �V+.h�i p.���. -- �-- -- � - �
(or many years, providing (easibiliry swd •� . �
cest-fi[ analysis, tzchnology upgrades ���.�. a �� �'�y ,�
tenant improvements at the main camou, : F�<��u��. 9�
at Maynuson Park. W��thin our intenor oe, . ,�i-'.-...'� ��'.� . -y-9
efforts, it is impor[an� io exemplify ihe �de�v ��. �'� _ . q�� �
of the owner in [he s pace. From ehe select�o�, ��� A_
matenals and mlors�o in�roduong supergrapn�,�, � , -r
and audlo-vldeo displays, we've worke�i >vnh '
various deparlments a[�he UW to announce,an�: "n�
enhance their brand on campus. Wework wirh��� ' �^'
st3nctarcls estabilshed by each buildmg and th��
over�l. Universl[y [o help achieve lhe r�o�.lt[ion -
ihi.v �I..s�rei= amo�g I rh ,_onsi,iu � I�,.-ii r, ��� �
a��d si�.n�=it�� �"t,-
UW COMMUNICATION BUILDING � " �
RENOVATION .
;:� .�� �.. ,� , � ..-. , _ ,
• ` I 1 . �
i � •i^m i �� � ;��e �o�r..=.;� i i n�� �f � � ' _ �.
Department ot Speec� and �h� Sc�ool o� i �
Communicauon mro one depzrtment Thr '�— " '� - ♦ I
desigm m�sists of faculry and graduate swder,i � -- ^ - j�
offices, a technology swie ui var�.ous med�a and �-�--� �i
video teaching 13bs,InsructionaVresearch room, ,�� - I�� � ..:_
�nd renova[ion of�signarure iobby. .� � '` �� ��
- � � f� � ,
?; r
\
UW CENTER FOR PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY �'-- � •
i d'_-i� i h� ' e �,�: en lh� J i :i . � ��� � .-�.
Yi hin�_iL i _i , �' Uei�°1,,, an i i i�, I �� --�� � ' ...�,
�
Il�s�i,ai, tlin _'n0i10 Sy�aie foot adapli�� i ��— . ,� �►��IV��� t i�!�"'�?!�T�'�
o( M�gnuson Park Building 7S (1936) pr��i r.�� '� � '� � � ��� ,. � �� r �
mmprehensive oral health services �o pe i i � �� �i '������ �, �
paiients. The proiect indudes dim�al Fr� . . � _ �
facili[ies as well as research and uaininy In� ��..��� �■- ri` �+-�-'` �� �� �
University of Washinqton School ol De�� ��. . .,��yr.�.� � ""�"' 'r��' t_ ��
Uniyue to this project were ihe challen r - r - ---- ,�! !
revitali[ing a buildinq that had 5at de��i '� � ..�z.., � �'�� ;,`
20 years. Low Floo!-to-Floor dimensions r�qu r���.: I. � � � �� '�_i+�i,
care(ul mordination or mernaNCai and eie�_ ��. � �
2, i
sv;;ems. �
I!.
RE�.�� Page 182 of 210
EDUC.ATION F4C,UT�E-. ^RO6 E=�iC;h,i,�� ��Er<`�iI�ES i A& E FOSTER
Fu��uST,ai t
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON -MULTIPLE PROJECTS �=ATTLE,WA
UWGOLFTRAININGANDCLUBHOUSE � � �' �
��i.e�i � n � me �on r ;�� I i ,i ,_. ��`°_ __ - - � ""-.
-�._,
°av'io� Jr�vior ic.v h,. me i n i ic .-�"'1 ., . ^5
Husky Men's and Wornens Golf Tearu and i �� - �� «��
exposure to olher 'sw�ienl athletes, vu�to� ��� " ; � i,* ��a-7
I SU �p
supporters- ARC worke�l wb,h the own � J ��.r �
structural englneer Co fin�i aeative solutui�s �o ' � �
add new s[rucwre withm �he exisung b ul I n_i �� � �� ��
- `M1 '
and minimlze Impact m the occup�e�' b�ul I i:i �
The sta[e-of-Che art, Indoo� [ralning faoli�.v h;� "'� .�
[he latest yolf [raining technoloqy (ind�d�.n�_
5
full-swing s[ations wl[h multiple cam��= - -
anyles), a pu[ting qreer, vldeo dlzplav wall, a��� _,..o�.��o� �""
acmmmodahonYOrafuturevci.a �:ml`���,id.+�.��. -
UW DIGITALARTS RENOVATION -- ---- -� --�- - �
ARCs design (or Tne �enie� '.�. C� � ' ,_ �_ — � �
a mn�emporary teoan, imarovemeni �iou,�_. � ��
in his[onc Ral[[ r-ialL Feaiwin� high �e� i ,_
wiJ� exposed beams and svstems, the T � �, i , � � -� - � ���
example of how contrasung 'm�enor an�' �xi� �� i• � � �` �1 . ���� �'
deslgn vocabularles can blend seamlessly.Te�an; ,
improvements should reterenee[he building [ha', .�`..__.. � ��: .
mntam[hem,the activi[ies�hz[occur w�[hin,anJ ���
�
fit the dren['s brand and imaye goals.The Cenrer � � �
for Diyital Arts and fxperimen�al Media(DX ARr; ���. S �,
fos[ers pa[h-breaking collabora[ions across many �'m, -�
disciplines. ��. � ;��� � �
TELECOMMUNICATIONSUPGRADES: �`��- � � ' r'7 � , - _'
--" r
SMITH HALL,WINKENWERDER HALL,AND � • . . . . a �.I , , . i �
MECHANICAIENGINEERINGBUILDING � �� ;� � �
i
�I ( �:roei I ilie p i i3iie ir�. �,�, I . _���.- �
i
7r .�I�eoi in u al�o�� i i i aie` �� a'ue � , . :
�I�ssroom & lat b�ildi n;. Two CwIJ i� �re �s-�. � � � �_ �� '.
historic and reqwred senst��ve roui�nu oi mn ` �� �� �� � ° �
� . � ,� ^� �--._�__
[hrough pnma y spacea AR� helped th �i� �.i. 1_.�� .
neqo[ia[e wlth faqilty and sr3ff epn� n Yn� ,� � ��` �u"" _
wD � � �
routing, shedullny,ana appropnate renoe � ��c � -
for each bullding. ARC worked wl[h rhe � - � �..,��
to ensure the documents were dea� t� , �� y �
of vvork, �n�lud�nq demoLtion, laytlo,�n � �� 's'*i � �
r I i _ r,l .i P-1� n i r I �J�i �I � . -I I ' � _ . � . .
RES.E Pa�e�1�83 of 210
EDUCAT'U��v FaCi�iTiE;
�, � _
i�
; ;.
--__—� —_ a� � �, i
� � , ,l. ii i2� �r er, 3, x"
. f ' '. i�� �'
,� � +-- '. . � �a�r"Di i i �::. II�L m� :iii .��, iFwelry,
� - � '! �''�`� �` � � pnnt making�nd pot[e*y are all m�luaed�n rhls
� ���� `��� � ��� j�."Z, _ � , exG[inq new(auli[y. There are spaces lor dasses,
- �,�_ � _. workshnos,anJ arus�s to work in a varie[y ofinedla For
.-� ;�-� �. ; K-12 through oost se�ondary. The c7allery�s desiyned
� oa�c��n� i .iep�,l�6cr�2uuom ��.,,i�ncuanc
� �,a! �
��`�.
: �_,,,__� _ _. ��_,_"�-�,_._,_. Schack Arts Center,Snohomish Arts Council,Everett
RE�.E� Page 184 of 210
.. z __ _
_ » ,, y a , , „ �
, .
ie
� _
�� . �
ai �: . �
,,,,;� '' .yr"tl,..
:., ,...
' 4v�- � . �Ye .
� ! •. �i�. . .
� i +. r
�l• � �; f,•
� .. i�^" �, �r".. � .
— - �' � � ^� y v. .
�a`" � �.��'�' . �� t ♦
�
• .. .
'�?�j t�t'� ���^k�4�-.��'���'�''�`.
11.f!
11
. - � , , 4 �.,. � ���^w c;. �:tis.� a -
, fi '� � .
,e��'' � �,NY'L4� ... ..
t +
�. .��'�,i �9 . � � � E�.
.: lr'Jtq � y � ���,�
m � ��f
�, �*' � � ` Y �
p � x ,r.
i �•�� I� {•� +@i4 � x .a"� � rn
. 4d'{�, � � h .eY' �'��•} ��� � i '�7 � ��
S�t . .y `♦� �� t.y��, :. i� .�� $� �, .
:, � 9 t- . � ` , aa'k'" ��'�Y�,�R f ��a Y, i � '� .
r J
�,t ���� � y,ti..:. •d � i�,° .,,a, "^.� �'r +T�, ..r�,�r��'�' . �
����
��` .. � " '. -X`'ro. u.. a G.s �i... '�,w+�y _ ��'
T � f ��.. . 1�T � �`_� �' rt�
.
� _"_ S �Y r ,,."�"xysryn�. � s .� ..�a"'_ � .
: � x`
, . "'q^< v _ -" �
e �
��� � � i}; *... _
� .,
����-� � � ' . .
, �;��FS :.� , �r'
: .p ._ _ � '__'�'r�7 '���� - . ��- I - __ .
�z .,/ � � _ _ �� � �� ��y�
J� -' �. '.. � � J'�
- ._" , . 5� I T �. ' � , � � � � "�. ,� � `��' r
u!
•� . ..- _ .. . � ���� . � -
. .____ _ ._ _ . .
__ __ _ . . � �� � .
� f� `_ y n
Y... �i .
_ _ .�.._. .•-. ..�.. .y � ���a"'��r . �'.
�.. - . . . . .__ __�� I J.J` .
_ r
•._ —
.. ' �i � �. s . .
'-�... �� . '�.
.. � . ..__ "�°x'�—_�:-"ar � .
: v �' r r�- �.•
__ �,
S�s. - .
_ . _..,
�'� � ._.� � ..
�.. .:
_ , � �, L . �� ,� ,� . .
i' _.i
-#., _ " � � ' ',J
r �. . � - . .. _ ' -a?
�r,s.. -.w+ _�,�M..' - -
r ..._.
� .
� w�
� .
��� "�. : . _ — .
'i
wAll� . .c� � "���t� �
:;� i:•� ,- > � , � '
�_.
� � .
..!7J,'f,7� ,ua ..,.:; �.v . ..
�'_ . . . � . ' µ_ �.
��.. • ..,i. , ��" w;v ( �l
�.9.-..� .« '�yk.
< � �
, 0. ��"+^"` �..�.�vw�55' .n` ,3 � "�'�
� r i - � 4 a i . 1 ���tr; ��;"!T'ig��'qr, �,
„ �: .,o"�'� t;. t�re�,�� '�� , '�" 'w.d�
_ $ . .` "
�� ,,-���.v.��A '�' � � . .,..._,�:. , . f�'M�°'
�_ � � �� T .A
�- . . '-�v � h�'��.
'. ."�.�'J . L�
+.Yw. . . . i � . . . � . - . .. . . _. , � .
�
� RES.E Page 185 of 210 .�
ri(J l..�i hv��
�,�.� HOUSING PLANNING AND DESIGN
`1Y, �•
,,,�..,,�� [��y��������� �yy�{�' -�� F� �I •� a u �i; in 11� J hlc h i aun h,qving �_ompl?[ed p�Oj2Ct5 fOr
��� '�� -�', '1 a -tl ' i �i,;'t� i �IO"��. r.: � OOmPnlS drB SUCC@SSfUI beCdUSB
A • P 1°' � �' tne, pro�dr e.e comh homen io� o� i�or�e .nd s ecial needs
g p populanons.
I � Q,.,,;� ;'�� :���'� [hey fi� rhe neighborhoods tney are �n, and [hey arA Cesiqnad around constru�tion
� '4�
�, r p convennonsthar make them affordable and eary ro maintain. �ach project be�7ins w�th
=�,q-, 'Y� � � �� a cohesive site plan chat works wl[hin [he evis[Ing communiry. Provldes a secure site
"�1r`��'� � wlth goocl vl4bloiy,and incorpora;es outdoor�athering and play areas. Many o(our
� "a � ^> � projec[s provlde incilvldual unit porchei anci entries ro foster a sense of ownership and
, � II a� �'}� .- e�couraye nelghbor in[eracnon.
`�' Q y a �
,.� 9s i,
� 6*� � ,� � 1 ,P - �e�eral projecfs have been developed wich WA State Housing Tr�zt Funds and have
� � ���, w Y-� ���uiuded the ESDS reqwremen[s in the sne and building design.
I ��..�
� � ^�, �� Q►t� 0, � �aMPLE PROJECT LIST
' '-_ '�� �, -- �,a,:L. ,� ` 4damsView,FamilyHOUSingfortheYakamaNaGOnHOUSingAuthoriry
.�p' :`O ��� Alb�on Place.Tne EI Rey,Coach House and Keyaone Resources,for CPC
'�����-'., s i�Commons.Senior Hous�.ng for Vashon Household
— Padfic Pead Suppo«ive family Heusinq for loint pac'fic Counry Housinq Authority
Plvoial Polni Supporilve Housing fo�Everert Housing Authori[y
� Ravenna Scnool Apanments,Senior riousing for Seanle h'ouslnq authority
� . L'�d'� Rose Crev ai Talus.Family Houvng(or imagme Hous�ng
Rosened9e,for AIDS Hous�nq of Wash�ngton
— - So�thridye Housinq weatheriza[ion(or Kinq Co�nry Housing Au[horiry
� lt' �octh Seven.Sen�or Hoosing for Oiymplc Commumty Action Program
' - .�_� . � '„'�rT-- Upper Skagd Tr�bai Housinq for famiGes and Elders
•, - Valh Kee Housinq Developmenc exreriors for King Counry Housing Au[horiry
\ �� ■ '�
._�. � itZ'� �j Some new housnq developments reqwre public engayement and Indusion in the
process such [hat the residena are welcomeci [o [heir ne�v neighborhuod From
-- many years ol experience,we have developed the impor[�n[skills required to enqage
' � che pubhc,scaff and eleaed officials in meamngful ways to address needs and reach
�- � �--- � - consensus, ARC has the zxperience to draw oui the communnv interests and concems
[hrocqh a(oc�sed procen,to develop strategies to address these,and help our dien[:
mmmunica[e w:th the �sers and nelghborhood Teamwork is key ro every projec�<
success and especially for affordable,supForuve housinq.
�,��� • � * ��,i ��, OU�2Xperience with hOb9nq dUlhO�i�iM nun defD I indudes d� �ln n�J hpu� nU �-� ,
• ���� O � �
qf�� ,T soiial service facilities foi peoule ol h�. i � � ��, i . � � .
•� t•,�
��� � . , recreauon cenrers, and faalinec In� � , �.
• — � -�_�� ������p'- aud�orities with whom vve have .. � �
� �- . • i- • ��
t
• " � �r i<���i1 COUnty Housiny AU�ho".��.
� 2alllZ HOUSiny AuthOri[V �
� E= i � -:�nt Pacific Coun:y Hous
' � � �''"��� Y �i.ama Nation Hous�no -
J
1�V12W HOUSIfIg}��C"'��' �
, f`�� �. s �� � �nerton Hou inr�A�.��.,.
!"��'����!.�.�� 17 ._�� ��, � i . .
��
RE�S.E� Page 186 of 210
HOUSING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/A&E ROSTER
� � AUGUST 201 i
ADAMSVIEWHOUSING b�i\�=4TO,WA
lhis p�o�eG �ndudes new con;[r�coon of 6R �
rhree-and four-betlroom ho�nes dus[ered In Fou�
neighborhoods overlooking a 9.8 aae centra' , , ,.
park on Yakama Nation land, and developmen�. - ' " - '-
of on and off-site �nfrast��tture induding s,ree;s
and utiliGes,sueetscape piantings,park ame•���.es. F
a new wa[er well and new 250AU0 gallon ���::�-�� � t-�-._I
rese�voic The site plan a designed lo trea�.e �,w.: _
neighborhoods wilhin t�e largerdevelopnirn�. A � y a- �s � ' � � -.- �� �
,�' �J 1 �7 ,�]�,
Six housing designz comprise the Adar� .: ��++ �y �I --�-�. �� � �7 ,
project.Common ro each desiqn a�e: . . ^ —Jd i
Accessibilicy-Each home is designed to oe��-�- -- �� � - •
the aging In place of�ts reA�iemor(or the poten��,.
needs of an elder returning�o live with f,m�'.y.
Exrended family-The homes are des�gned
around a cen[ral gathering rooin anchored al one
end'oy a la�ge kitchen.
3"
-,a���na-� � ��.���,�., �_,a�� � , ,-
i .ri�!� �,-n'i . �''i]. r _
v��r
i
�
•Y
<
�r�
�� �
t_� i
� � __-::-_ __. . �
° +n' -
�� �
1�� lJ
� • �
1 �
+
GWNER MFO:Yakama Na[ion Housing Authority =,-� � ,'�� '
. .*�. , ' � . , II _
i
SQUARcF001AGE�, 68houses � ' � . "�� �;�_ ' �' i'
` � ,u.�
DATEOFCOMPLETION:SummerZ0�3 �� •- �ks.�j'
- ,- : — , . . _ _ . . . . -� . . � .c-- —=
RES.E Pa�e 1�87 of 210
HV._.�II'1'��
ROSECREST HOUSING I��AQUAH„WA
A commu ity of 5ve, t�ree-story bwldings has `���� '�`� /�
� \ \
51 �nits oY oficrdable f�mily housinq and a �`�
\`
community room laurdry facilines leasina off�c �
and managers apartmen . Th bullJings ar . � �
designed ro h int the �eighborhood or inarR�� �-- "-
ra2singlefamdyresidencesanil,ownhouse�. ��,�'"�.,,, �f � ��
\ I it �
Located on the hillside of �ouyar Mounia � �.�. ��-� _ i d � 1 � ,�.
� i
pa�;of[heTaWsDevelopmeni,outdoorarne��i�.��_ �_�--�, � ' � ,.
for resldents Indude outtloor plav �rei� a������ �_'�� � 1. � �
baskerba'J cour�. Tne apa«ments rari�� i -� � _�_ � ; �g
to 4 bedroom and each have the�� � n i � -�: � � „
v t ,.-��
rela�eden�ry. Someunitshavemou� i� � � ., � }�� � ' �
1 t�.t ,
[he north eas�across a preserved NPi I � J ' ' 1 iI
._—. ' 1 ��4„ ��Nr�j �,
— . �� ��1� hl �
Sustainable design featuees mdu Ic I ti -.. --_! ' •�;�.- .� �.;=_
fixtures, Ene�9y �tar apolianczs, ener�y -� � -. �:
lighiing fixwres, low VOC pa'm[s and s l,�n.
nawral dayi�ghting and ven�ilation The � �-� t -
r..;.
features native landscaping. We also � � i 1-�� . � . '. +�� . �� � �
wl[h lhe planninq deparunem to mduce pj ��:
requiremen¢less d�an code. � �
um �- ,i/ . I . � � '_
A� ; F' .i� ,* q �: ry'.
a�'' , '',��;
�' .�:� j� ��..,
-t- _ �� _�-
:---- _.� ,— _ _ �
�,`-, - -�"�` �rd:- 6"�
�� �. .
; ,: �-
���+ ^ �'�,�'P�r�.`. !:
, �k�µ�o-.,,� Y _. � �.�
� ,� �'
d . 'x
�-,; +°�`, .
� ��, t,j -.:�'v .'I;
. ° - . 3[. *� �.
, ,
�vNFRiP,I U I iilin��h �-inq � . ± ''d� �:� .,�F
�l ,�s'� '�i +�� � �
.. .���. F �� ,_
�QUAREFOOTAt�r: 51,lOJsLShuddiac � �- ' �"' � ' `".
* �k, y '
„��. � '��;T� #t:. ^1
DA�EOfCOMPLETIO�I:Winle�'4�.'�, ' ,N__ �� •`�t� � �,�
�'� ��� . 1 _,...
R�a i+w� �'T v: ���..✓ . -.
..I.I iT'i.�' .� . . .. .,� L �$t ��" �'y � � .
�� � �' ,.
RE�.�� Page 188 of 210
. . _
yui ;_ , _ ��ini- �� � � ` , �;T�z
� AUGUSf 2013
JG COMMONS VASHON,WA
In partne s-�o w�th Cor�mon Ground and�ashor � � _-. ,r. �
Household ARC deslgned [his facilnv o� twe�y-- - � � '�` .�,�"�
oneunl[sofsubsdi�edsenlorhouslnq SeUowo� �': � �� #
Ihe;ite[he bullding is dergned to blPnd w�h ih., �' ti����:y'�� . - "�_ '�I
�. � �4+ ..Y� �' � �g
loal archirecrcreoffarm housesan�i smule I,r��.� �- ,��:tiG� ,. x ":•'y�
�.•t
homes. Tne projec[ provided common , io��_ ��v �'r � ��
for the resden[s Induding � mcimurnu � ��� �'� ' -�
lai.ndry f�'iLnes, ard adminlsCra6�r o� or - � � �� !�� ��
Vashon Household �ocated on Vashon Itih h.- ' � � � '���� � �
project provided much needed s�rior ���, �_ �
and was well rece'rved by the public ind i � .* �� �
'�. h'' _
c -
Sus[ainable features lndude on-Si[e sto�n e -. �.— ��6�� ro.�
detenrion, Energy S[ar appliances fuores Pr� . . _, �
Ilgh[ing, n�[ural ven[ilauon, univ rs�i d�-ign. - �';°" �.°�,
nauve plantings, and proximi[y to tanst anrJ � ' '� _.—, ��� �� � ��
shopping. ARCand lts civll engineer wa�ked wl�� r�- ����, ---�
, .. ��� -�-•..-t'^
Kinafo�.nl,��nrhede ���.�,fa'iar Ir,l°enii.,:, _ .
�C�'lJ'1 IIF§-��d l I 15yb1 � 'dlll�.. i!
I
'�. � � '��° .-
� � \
�r �
� . `� ' ... �" ��-W
� '_-.,.. .. ". �� ..� ,�
' �'
i , � �
—__ �t�'li � � �-..�� _� ,,��
���
� _r�� .�"°`�. �
_ ���� . 3�m',.
�...�. . . �-,
-rr_-•... _.,.�-..1-;" .- . ... �
1 (l � ,, „"`'� .;�
i � �" � �� n4 .
�' i �i �. .
� y��' r
. . . *tt� . T� 0.�yti`:'.
# ��Ir; ��
� I�� � IIII.
I f
I � I �
� � iM�� I� [' ' I �
�
� �
'��1�'� I . -I,. 1�ia' '�
i�..ilE9�NF�..�.�ii�,hnnH��.,chii.,. ; C' � � �—_, ' �
�i '� ,i'� i ( � '
�QUAFE F06TAGE: �9,400 s( _ � — � , � � � � .
DATEOFCOMPL�TIOM.2003 �� � � , � ��, �'
� �� � _
I " �
„
_
RES.E Pa�er1�9 of 210
� � �
,,,
KCHA SOUTHRI�GE RENOVATION KENT,WA
ho�r�nc^h e�thKlna_oun�yNO�,�s�n� =ut7orirv j �
&✓d.G.Clark ARCA!chl�eas aeSlqneU 3ii extenor �, �
upgratle to [ransform a 1960s single wvthe brick �'� �� � �- � �
apartment biock In[o a con[emporary aparrmem � _ - � � ._� �
bullding, which enhances [he nelghborhoor. � ���_
,
fabncThedes�gn 'mcWdeswlndowreplzcemen�. � � ��� � � � `�
and new ex�erior dadding systems Co allevia�,� ,.� Ti'� - �- �
_p
mois[ure Issues and provide needed exterior ��,vali � � n �' , . �
InsulaCion (or [he tenan[s to reduce ene�gy ��se � T , .
andcos[s. ARCworkeddoseiywlththeconcaeto� ' � � ' •.�.'!'�,.
� �. ,Z„�?r` _
and ownerro design a rys[em that�s durable aaa .. '
cr�steffec[ive Cap[urinqspacebetw �n � �� -., ' ���� �
bnck'fins'withbaywindo�NSaddedsquareF�� j,e , --. ,_ . � _ � � �
and light to each of the unit;. Tne comi�� . � .,;,��,- . � ��-r;� '��,..y � y '
is",�,��'_,� _�_�- - - '�.
building was also renova[ed to prov�dr n� �� .
needecl space ior famtlies and e7hd�en io i ia�•�. -
[ogeiher. — �
�' �.
I � ^
r �
�i 1 �''�'�' �' `� .z
� _ �� �, � � '
� I l ++ �.4l
{ d� } '1 r(�.
�1. . � A .��,-�"z
Ir �.t �
��- �el�, '� �
I'�. h .. .��;' �.r,p �`�.� ,� ,.
mthnJgr —_ ' .'�° _ ' ' '. —.'__ .. 1
k '�' r '_. .
r'�.
�'" � � �� � � _ � _
� ����, A �.
�.� 1 �" ;; � � � �I�
, .
�-., ��I! i 1 _qci I ,-i_I di .l�i ", � Y i';"`pp' ' 1�,. ' -.
. . '/ �I �i -_R 4 C�aN4. �� II.
AIt p �� �Y'� ' � �
S�UI�lIE F��TAGE. ZU.���1� •� •�~'�l. �� , _ .
�
DAiEOFCOMPLEfION:_!Q.� a �� . �i l if � �� ,� �� ,�� �'� .
\�,_ +� � �_�: '� � . E; � '
••1<TEU'�TIOi�I�05T�.$I ) ;s�',lr� �s�lY� tu*� = � .'.a+"�� . _ _ .��'!a't'1 :_
RE�.�� Page 190 of 210
HOU�IN�; PI;UF�»�ni�q� �EI;VI�ES/A& E ROSTER
Ai iGU�r��;��.
EHA PIVOTAL POINT rvERETT,WA
�v�e�r.'r. �n eonn,��..�:on. ih�.s proiecl is loca[ed .•"' - _....
near Broad�.vay A��.�en�e m Evereu. Tne =��. ��
Poin[ apar[men[s will provlde 20 uo�' � �
supportive hous�ng for survivors of do�-�,-.��,.
vlolence. ihe [wo bulldings, operated bg E�:�..��
Hous�ng AuGhority,are se[ on the site ro e� �-
a southeas[ facing cou«yard at the�orne � . . �.. ��A C 8 ,- '
szcure priva[e play area behind[he bwlJ�n � �`�' ��l 1 . — � .�
common rooms open onro both outdoo� �. �� . ��� �i�� � � �:� � ' � y ��
. - _ �-- . . '"
All unifs have[heir own Ground rela[ed enr� u�����. � i I� ' " " ��'�° '
' �.l:V �.f 4` ..
are designed to encourage 'eyes on [he .ue�:�� , �'��-��,�_ �-��� .' -� '
w ;/ 6:�
�
from U�e kitchen,living,and dlning ion �, �. � ��'�� - i �,�.
-��-` - �. �
� 4
ARL worked with the chent �nd i r�� '0' �✓� �. �' • . ]
�`
team ro find ways to reduce construcnon c�sr - ' � �` ��a� ��' �����
w�thout sacrificing program oi des��gn ameniti�_:: , �__� � ' �_+ r.�„�-
- to accounr for costs zssoaated w�rh poor so�i - -
conditions. �
� �
.
i'l
4� I I;
��` �I �f� I- �I ; �
�I���d��,�' � � ,�{� i�'
/�Ii'� �� � � - —
^'���ll`'� � I ��
-r �'��r������ � � 1� I. ��� . -- �— -
� � t �� �`M� �
' i
,; ��t,�� ��� �� ��.1� . .
'y� � i ��l` �iJ ���'I't'N �_ i
I I �y '
. ��� _ I� �,��I� I I 1 ., ,_ ` r
L �� -.��� � I:;�. �y�,�.
+' �� _�� q r'� ' _'.. . 'z'.'�' . _ . ...
_ � �i�_�..' .. _� . __„_.
� �� --�` r-_ ���
,
1.... � -�-==--= ,
1� �� �...�
_!�� �
OWNER WFO:Eve�en Hous�ng Auihoriry '. �
�
,-..
SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2i.000 s` -.�.� � -'
�_--� _ � �� , . .
DAiE OF COMPLETION:Surnmer 20'a � ' � �
� " 1s . �
,, - - � � � �� �
RES.E Pa�er1�J1 of 210
■ ■ 4 � ' �- — t
/ � ��� - `, � s�,.a� u �, �,� ��z ��e�� �� ���_,�.
/�,� ` ` �W- uwv�de elec[noty for the offices
� � � � �1 p �F . - �coi�monspacesforthe ISunn
s�;..
— ' � . � �! �f �� ' 1�� � �' r� e'��pmen�. ihesepane�spro��de
.
�rr� nn�mt sa�.��n�s� vr �ve�r ,J i :,
- _ _ ' Y � ."l'I�rl ! _ ��O�I� �Tl� l:�l� ��,�. ...
,�' _ . � " '- �. _�, _ ' i _ ._ i. t .'1. :nrr.�, ...
. _ �__ ' — � !h .�. �.. ., . -, .�. ,
— - �- Pacific Pearl Supportive Housing,South
-, , �
RES.E ` Page 192 of 210
_ � �. ��
'�i 4
� ' ^ '�'�A
l 7' ' �y
�;*. Y - `� � � - i
I
� •] ! . ry,j. 1 _ -.
•:_ . Y.
�'; ' � � ��' ..
�
. . . .p. .� _ .
. � .. : a .
, • ` e�.�'._..:� �'� �
• f 7. a.
: '
,�t w' ''"�4
.��� � ..,_j . _. _.' , ��
��� �
' �
l
,�,� - ��f - '� � ' �
, a-.�,
.� - .
_ , _
r ' �
�
•
r,�o� , � �
1�' `, ., • �
: � r �.,
_
. . _.s�: � r � � .
� �
� � �, 9 y ,�� � .
' ' � �� � r
'�^, ' r __�.,..A„� �
;.3 � __ ._ .
� �. � - "
�_:� ' �
6'`'
�
�" •yl -
_I. �
�
� s,��
i
I:f
d
� 1
T. . � ,
RE
t:= .� . ,.
P'�'��'���"��_�;
PUBLIC FACILITIES
Rosehill Community Cente� Rainier Beach Community Center
Je'1niEr;��n i . e..-rea� �ii , _., .�..�.� . .� �?`,a5.�2ni�r' `.
CiiV o(MWcli�o Sea°�ii°Pa*k;zS Recre,� �����
(azs)z53-a�ao izu��;;�3a-�c�ar
X
�bern�r:Cvr � ...._ � �iJ '� _ � . _- _"_ .
_._ � i i-.��1
On-Call Contract City of Bellevue South Bellevue Comm.Center _ - ��
e��o•:. = -�.. ..,. r7r, o��.i .-�� -� ". ,
�
�e� � _ . ;� _� � � � � Jj �
a� �s ,., .., ;�.� c � ��_ r
ykost��cibe�lewPwa.us �1!S 45� cb24 �
k,rueger@bellevuec��a�_;-. �
ADMINISTRATION
Mukilteo City Hall Sammamish City Hall ���'!��, ,.,
,'��.m Niggem�'ei =_ � k�����;.;, I ` -_' .
Ciry ol Muklllen �''�.:u�is;�'i �':` �u � y
y,7 . z : �la �h �of�dmnia^�ish y
��i� �e ��� � �� �i '.��. =owa.us �300)4263043 {$,��1'. �
pete��butkuseonsultirg.c�,^� ���,��
PortTOwnsend Gty Hall �S�. i '�� � � ��� ����
�� -z , , , ,,� � �� � �� - , � �
��� �� � ,, ' � �
(3601379-50+'4 �, ��'�
dpereaon@oivolatis �f `� •-� �
MEDICAL& LABORATORY /�ii� � �►
POMA Fertility Clinic Centertor Human Development - y -
k ii ��' � . _ . _. . . � �,.,, � ;n .�. ��n,r.� �` �
,- .�, �,,. , � .
� , .� .�.i I 3 ' ii ,•..--.r�,•-
_ ' `�.�
_' .7""� (�'� I l�.� �, 9 .
� � ■ V�
The Polyclinic � � J�, �,' .,�
+ I����3 —_,-
.,� '. . ... � �. � C �IRn • .-.�.
�'li �MJ-'��'�.ii ��
1 �II.�r o,il :.-I'llly, �_,�,�
, • ;;��'i
_. � �`
RE�.�� Page 194 of 210
_ _ _ : _�r_ .
-_ _ ___ _ _ _
P�.��,�_��1���3
EDUCATIONAL :�,�-."��. � '' -" �
UW Golf Renovation � � ���` �� �
Suquamish Early Learning Center �" � �
Ken Kubuta,Pro�ea M�n�i,�e� Bob�at�,F�ojea�V�anay���
Universuy ol Wash�ng,on Cau��al Pro;ens Suquamish T�ibe . —�
p0616i6-0360 136D)3�dh�:�'_ �. �= -�.
r
kr.:.botae� v3',��il �nl-�, ti,y � �� l�diris�n.^,�,n.��iS � „ . �
IA.. ��* :'I
�� '�a' ��„ �
UWIT&HealthRenovations , r, ��_
- r "'�= r..ii
_a:he� ��e��:�.,,a',, � �. k',,n�;��� ' r � r . .--�
� ° �'� ^�I'in��°—
UnweisilYOIJVi 'in�lliui i,iDil'�,�� .�� ii
(?Oti)5�3-OS4S
cvoyt@u.washington,rJ��.
HOUSING �
Southridge Renovation DVS Shelter&Administration r
Riek HoFfma��,Projecr Manager Ld�n an Fuss,Project N ind�°� � � �� . �$r ��
K ia Cou�i -!ousinc Au hnrlq� ���� > > �oi;nd
� _ E s
� � d- JC ?] I n�,i. � �
i�1dr�111r,41.�I1:Drq �:�: i t'1�_ �run � V � n I�,u1.�.Jfr1 ��#�. ' � �! "I
� �� I�
PivotalPointApartments ��y� . ' _ ''�
RickDo«IsFacil�ic i_'���.•�-�:,�
Everett Housinq Q ,���� �S�. �
1425)339-IOU� . .. _- �� ��� .'` �
n�kd��ec'��a.on� � .
RES.E Page 195 of 210
�
[erci;icreSOUrCetU[he.ommi�niya -�� �;. �� � �' ' �
showz that a healthy, high-performance � a\ �"�� � r
energy-efficient facility can also L:� • ` I •�� I�
�t t
beautiful,affordable,and practical.' �"�y � �
Srephrn Nnrrrar,Exer�,irrve Duec°��i � -�"
r.i .. ....... I�. ..u• , .'P�.�ir
� �
!'� �
Springwood Youth Cenrer,Kent WA __. _
RE�.� � Page 196 of 210
�,�-� _ '�i� �� ���'�r� � ��
����� � � �
- , _ �
-�•..- � �
�
.. �..�
�,
��,� '" ,� ; � _ _ �
� , _ 1 . !_ r , .
��� .
t �
� �� � , �
, ��„� . - •` � ,, r, s:
,, ,��
, �� ��, i r
� . 1 � s i' t - �
_ ,
. .,�
r \
_ r-
.�� r , L;',��� .,
.� <.�+,.,'
i
� � ` ,
� `� � ✓
'I' ��� ` "'.�
� r �� .'i�� � . .� i ' ..� �.
� ; � �
� ` ' ,. �j �I ��
�
�.�� : _ �i � /
' ' �
' �,I r'.I� f, . ' '
.�, � � � ',
i � '.'�. � � ;;a. ,
Ys , ,
�' R .
. , .
• '�...r �
w",'t. � 4,�.
� �
. ,
a � - �t a�;:�--_ - 'F
� �y _ _ I
�' '� �•.n=;: .
..., � r ,
�..� :;'��- := i,^.�-
f� � ; a �* -
� � .
' � . ' ._�� . . . , r .
. . ' '_ ��. � - � .
� � .. • _- - . ,., ' .
.r r � . . .�. � � .
RES.E . Rage 197 of 210 �
� ='� /�
PR;J,��T i�lA���A;�t� Q,�a�_�=�C°TIOI��
�4lt-. �,� -_ � � (�.T ,..,' � , c�_'_'�
� �� '-riCl?A!
���__��,�� >iao LokCincjs deslgn passion �s con[emporary archllecture Lhat mntrlhutes ro the public
�-;Im,indudina community and recreacion cenrers, parks,��e srations and lib�aries. He is afso
��ir� _��s[ed �^� heaF.h and wellness desiqn for privare, p�,.blic anG ncn-p�ofit dients. In all cases,
�"� ���open apprwch[o the design process assures d�at all Aakeholclers'views are lis[ened to and
�� �r�s�deredwi[houlcompromising[hearchi(ectwalouLCOme.
ARC ARCHITECTS
� v ,i,�n5 expenise is communiry and recreation design. He biings to ARCs clients eepertae in
proqramming and des�9n for broad communiry needs, focusing mul[i-use, mul[i-genera�ions,
EDUCATION �r��,�ong term wsta�nabiliry, He has designed cencers for tne clues of Seattle,Rlchland 7acoma,
N1 �� �' . . .. -_ � .�.��� �-__ I�.k"vila,andBellevueandche5uquamishTr�be.
MI iv��d�-� <,I �.. , I ann�n;� '�98�
Unive�, y o'�icqon,gFl Arch. i u?-� N�s experience in healthcare deslgn indudes clinlc, ancillary and diagnos[ic facill[ies for [he
Polydlnic(working wi[h[hem for nearly 2S years),[he Universiry of Washingron Medica�Cen[er,
REGISTRATION Harborview Medical Center, mmmuNry-based dients and private practitioners. Many of
S�te ol Washingion. 1993 the p«�jects are renova[ions, requirng camful conslderatlon of how on-going operatlons are
S;aieoi0�eao�i ��__ ac�o^n�indaled.
L�=r?q7:'Oi�;
References: See Reference Sec[ion
AFFILIATIONS
Amencanlnst�wteoiArcn�tecu RepresentativeProjects
WARecrealionandParksASSOCIa[ion publ�cF�Ailminls[raGonFacililies�.
�owi�t�Reg�o�ai Con'.r.�ence and Even[s Center
��re Staua�3��aenovauon,Seattle
Fire 5[ation ZS Renovation,Sea[Ue
!_ake Clry Library,Sea[de
. . Rosehill Communicy Center.Mukilreo
New Holly Nelghborhood Campus.5eatde
Ralnier Beach Communiry and Aquatic Centec Seattle
, Rlchland Community Cenier
' " So�;[�gellevue Cominunity Cen,er
� ;�I��ieal&Labora[ory:
�°ner for Human Development,La Grande OR
� i
„� ��..iriis Heal�hcare Cllnlc.Bellevue
-
r Pdydinic Northgate Famlly Pracuce,Seattle
�a�oiyd�n�c Cardioiogy James Tower.SeatUe �
�
. a2 MedlCine CliniC,Kirkland �
f
r - ;�.,�_aUOn FdCilitiPS:
� ��ack Ans Cen[er,Everen I
� .��+�.,,amish Early Learn�ng Center,Suquamish Tribe
• .� � i�i',��GolfTraining and Clubhouse.Seatde
— �.a �ea!thcare Renova[!ons.5eattle
- . ;�i McBTelecommunlcaUOns U i + �. . . �
�'i sng,
.�.���on Supoortive Nous�nq,Sea.��-. �
..,; i ..��..�.r. ,�� .,. ,
. _. . ��..�� � . � � .
RES.E ` Page 198 of 210
����i=��T tiIANAG i ��',; 1!�> L�f �?`,,�;� Pk. � �_.��,_1 ir __. . ��_�/A& � RGiT���
� � — - -- — - AiJGUST 701 3
�� . . � . . _,...,_
� ��"�� PRINCIPAL
��` t''� f ���e� Bond's goal as a pnndpal at ARC �s to ensure that ;he firm's architectural designs exceed
� '�, � ".� ��'=�,['s expxtations.Guid�ng p�oj?rs tr�rough irreracnve dialaq wich owners,[heir sra"or ehe
��� . , , " at large, Rex is able to syn[hesfre a proiecCs essence and Uien weave crea��ve des�gn
�
��.�r�ons�hroughout each project.
ARC ARCHITERS -�� ��ds much ol 4RCs civic desiyn work foo�sed m !arqz part on oty halls,pubUc work and
� ._._, . ���.ee Manv of i�h�se project�s are designed as essent�at laci�it�les wRh rooms that can conven t�o
vmerqency operations cemers in response to a m�jor event,Cities wlih whom he has workeci In
EDUCATION '.��.�capacitv indude Bonney Lake, Ellensburg, Kirkiand,Muklheo,Sammamish and Washougal.
� 1 ,�,�:a ,� 1���.- ,. '���s :ype of work has[ranslated direcdy to o:her government agencies and corporate dlen�s.
_�.���eio� oi :- i� - ., ,. � r�i-hasbeendesionleadformanya9encyandcorporateheadquarrersaswzllassa[elliteoffices
Unlversiry o(Copenna�;ien, I a;5 aruund the Northwest.
REGISTRATION a�,��ner aspea of ARC Ardu[ects a �ts conT�[ment io desgnmg projec[s for the more
Sczce oY Wash�ngcon. �?8', nadia�nally underserved populauons in oui society.Rex champ�ons this efforr leading tne firm
LEED FlR,?006 lr�designs for affordable housing and soaal suppor[seivlces.H2 currently is spearheading an
office wide�esiyn effort forTao�ma/Pierce County Habit3[°or Human��[v.
AWARDS
NationalHOnorA�var�. �988 References: 5e�=�e`a�enee�ec5o�
Certificate oF National Merit,H_U.D.,198b
Int'I Illuminat�lon Desiyn Award, i99; Representative Projects
�la�_Assoc.ol Iritar�o D� ��ner<�., I r-i.C'�- '�4um��i�°.;� � "7_�'.��,�?;�.
,. ., ._ _:"n���on��u���� � _a�.=i.�e�t:lr
`��znsbury Cily Hall
�er'..erson Park Gymnasium&Renovation.Seattle
' ��C County Ho�sinq Au[honty CommuNty Bulldings
._,��,-I[eo Gry Hall
�.nryx Software OKces
P�r,�jllup T�ibe Elder Cen[er
.����� Angeles Senior Cenler
_�,����namish Ciry Hall&Police S[ation
��!rd�eal&Laboratory:
�=�� r,e�hnoloqy Fesearrn Building,Seaule
3cs;on Scientific,�eattle
_� �;,,� ' .:1�J Agricuhure Reszarch Center,MountVemon
_ �
'�- - :�,-a[ion FaclGCies:
_: . .�. _ommunica[ions 6wltliny Renovation,Seanie
- ,. ���gicai qrts Renovauon,Seattle
�"` .� �, �i:�r EDG�Classrooms,Lowe Hall,SeatUe
�
s ng:
L '��;�°�is View Housing,Yak3ma Nation,W�palo
��-�..-�.�mmons Senior Housing,Vashon
F.�,_i5c Pear)Suppor[ive Housing,South 9e�d
..����a S�hoo�Se�!o•�ousinq.Sea[Ue
_,_= s:A"z _..._ � � , � . . ��r.,�-
.. i � ., . - � . � � . .�,
RES.E Pa�er1�J9 of 210
PERSONNEL QUAU=IC4T'0!�;S
�.4. �.¢ � -
-- ASSOCIATE
I
� <,_:G-�w. Fmily Wneeler is a tnoughtful pro)ect manager and archi�ecl wiin more than 15 y�aa experlence.
�� She bnngs creaove vis�on and organizaoon m every project. ne�expenence as a[eam leader and
�
consensus builder provides dients wt[h the azsurance[hat[heir concems will 6e addressed in a
�.nou9h[fW manner m tne design proeess.
I I::� rxpeiicnce has focused on public�u��ded p�ojects includ-�9 civ;e build�nys a^d afYOrdable
ARCARCHITECTS �i���,.,���,� Emilyundeatandshowromaket7emos:o�publicfundsthrouGhthedesignolenjoyable
'niOO,'�.�' ,+n�idurabieplacesforourcllcntsandthelrcommunliy.Sheenjoys[hepubllcprocessanelworking
.�. _��owne�s to inmrpora�e their ideas'mro a quality des�gn�or eaeh progam on ns unique sne.
EDUCATION
Un�versi,ryo�Wa::'�n❑qion �'nc nas managed rhe deslgn and mnstrucuon for several low-income supportive housing
Master,o�Arch��e��er- ' ?.- �evel�pmenrs'missaquah,5out�hBend,andEverett.FromexpenenceEmilyknowshowto�nclude
_�eiyreen Sustainable Developmen� S�andards when required on new hous�ng developments.
Unlvers�ryofMarvland Additiorally,sneis3ttively�rvolvedirHOUSinqDevelopment�onsortiumandleadsrhefirr"sefforts
Bachelor of5cience in Arch., i994 io st�ry current wiih technology developmen�s ana requ�remenis for publldy funded projects
M;nor�.n Fre•ich
Fmll�Is very knowledgeable about sustalnable stra�egles and syst�ems t�hat can be expbred as
REGISTRATION oGi,ons fo�aach project. She was the LEED project administrator for Port�ownsend Gry Hall and
W�;�1°'g�0��,7�f7�a Raln�erBeachCor'imun;ryCenterandPOOi,andunde�s[andstherequlrements(orLEEDaswe!ias
..E=JAP,�00�� �hzpoientialdienrbenefits(orva�ieryo(sustainabl�>deslynoprions.
� 'ROJGCTMANAGFR
�� �`.:
�;� .� � �':��n�:wiis has pracliced archicec[ure since 1999 and during that time has developed a s«ong
- �, . . ,nn for providing sens6ve and [reative architecwral solueion5 (or Gvic pro)eit rypes. He
� narticular f�lfillment in creating design solutions tha[elegantly dove[arl p�oiect-specifi<
�� ����am needs w�tli con[ext�-driven building (orm, orien[ation and ma[eriallry.Thls is most
� ��-nt in his work on fire statlons and mmmuniry and �ecreation centers whic� are often a
ARCARCHITECTS � �,�,:���IembodimNnLOfmmmun7iyldentllyandvalue5.
,� ;hc, end, Faul bnnys a strong �ommiiment ta work with the public to creale arch4ec[ure
EDUCATION ��'��'PFleas the culture and d�aiac[er oF th2 comm�nity i� which 'it is built and he ��z adept
Un����r,�.��ohOreqon �� creating and mainlaininy an en�oya6le dlalogue between all of lhe players ol a pro�eCl
Bachein�e'A�rnl;rc.�.�e, I?9a ind�d�ng owner, user groups, community groups, mns�ltants �n� contrac[ors throuyhoul
Nli, , , i, � •.� .. .-� ,. des��Un and Coiu[rucbnn. Paul's s[renglh as a designer mme5(rom h',ablliry tc�listen careFully
.+��r; �.noughdully. His open-minded approach allows a uniq�e and mnsensus-buih desiyn to
REGISTRATION `""'"=1��
S�ateoii)�eqon 1i�0'� n;��expenen�edprojec[archi[ectandmanager,Paulhasth�skiilsrequlred[omanageap!o�e�Y
- �,;�� programminy �hrougn cons[ruc[ion while dillgently keeping a pruje:[on sdie�ule and
S�ateolW�sh i ��� �0 '� �_�., �.{,,��,udgeLPaulisrespon;ibleforardiRecturaldeslgn.consuh,ntcoordlnauon.cons[rucGon
;��.uninlstration and speafica�iun research an�9 wrihnq. His mosi rec.eni� completed piojects
AWARDS _�„le Rosehlli Commun�[y Cen[er in Mukilteo,WA and renovaC�ons to Sea;�le F�re 5[aoons 25
WRpA Facil�ry Spod���gh•.���,-a-". �_,. ,m��i ta.
RE�.�� Page 200 of 210
r ERSONNEL QUALIFiCATiO�iS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/A& E I+OSTER
AUGUST 2013
� �'
� A��OOATF
�
� Jan el Podoli r, � de:���gner�nd oro�ea manager with mon. i.han LO year4 0l experlenee. Hs
� "� - ��ak ndudes siynificant proleas in the ciwc, commundy and �eaL•h care archrtectural fields.
��� � A�.a proiea manager, he nawrally brings a rechnlcal diligence to new mnscruction as well as
ri ` � �.i:nons and renovauons of ewsUng swc[ures. Hls knowledge of mnstruct�on, tne dienls'
� - - u�ogr��nmatic goals and understandinq each pro�eci's design�ntent is his passion.
ARC ARCHITECTS p„ii"s nvic expenence Indudes a vqnifitant amount of adap[ive re-use. He has worked with
- ���� � ���,�^.crouspubllcagenciesvvahlnLheGtyofSeaWerheClryol'Kvkland.5nohomish,King,CowGtz
.u��.i Kitt�ias Counues to conve«derelict exisfiny properlies in[o new lony-term investmen(s,
EDUCATION
Pennsv'��an�a S�.a�e Urnv.��s�',�. ��'n's nealth c�re expenence'm bolh [he public and priva[e seaor has evolved from the design
8ache�.o�o��r��,��-ei�..��- '.-. ,. �-� ''e��v replaeement hospita,[o the tenant Improve^ie�.ol new or exis[�ng d�nical space. His
� � passior. for cemplex coordina�ion between tne disciplines ensures the final building product
ezceeds mos[dients'goals.
� � i;OJrCTMAfvAGER
� �^' . '`s'r3�dasiewlc��s a reg'atered archrtea and an acmmpl�shed projec[manager whh more
� i.,�, 13 ye2rs o�experlence, He is the long=_s[ tenured projea manager a[ARC Archlteccs,
n��g the firm in Z001 after moving to Seattle fiom Phceniz,Anzona.
��� « �qa�dless of the siTUano< or ;ubject matter in the realm oF arc���iteau�e,Jeff has an overall
� � io present mforrtizuon t�ha� is pmcise, inlor.natrve and inspirrcig. As a clesiyner, he hds
ARC ARCHITECTS '� ��='n ablGCy to implement vls�al ted�niques to clearly express cleslqn In;ent lo cLents,
b�,idaerz and the g2neral public. Jeff's graphlc des�gn skill ser has resulred:n work as a signage
_ ���.�z,hantonpro�ec[sthathealsomanagedasanarchhecLinceqra,'�ng;�oergraph�c��magery
EDUCATION ���-+ means of d�rfinirg project iden[ity and own�r hnnding. leff is also u[illzrd as fhe offices
_ . , ^� h:ec[u�al pho�ographer rorwebsne and marketinq�magery.
i ., � , ��.. ��.i.i
in his tim�. ar ARC, leff has buih an extensive porrfolio of successful medKal office and
UnlveisityofFlOnda. heaithcarepro�ectz- Heovasiheon-callarchl[eaforThePOlyd�nic°uge:Sound's�argestmul6-
BA In 4��h�ie�tua'DNS�a�� ��i94 speoalty medital dtnic, for over 8 yrs focusing on fast-traek interioi renant improvements ro
_,,, . -, _,_ ^^.nv of�heir numerous Seatt'�e dlni�s. His heal�ncare dfents alsvindude Overlake Hospftal,
� Nonhwest Hospital and �he Un�versily o(Wash�ngton.
REGISTRATION ip�f has bull[long-s[anding relationshlps wl[h local hl�hereciu�ation enli[ies induding Sea[de
��- � � � ' -��'� ' „r ve�s�ry and che Umveairy of Wash���nqton, w�[h a focus on office env��onments. �ihieiics
a�,�•� ihe a�t,_
RES.E Pa�er2b1 of 210
PERSONNEL QUALIFIC.4T10���
R �RO�ECr nnnNA�ER
.. � .�, �� ie�nifer Ree>e a an experienced archi[ecturai desiqner and project manager responsible for
, 4 � � >- -. deslgn, .o�sultant coordination constructi�n administratio^� and specification resear�h and
wri[iny,
� `
� Sh�aelieves h�an architecwre that Is rooCed[o[he pl�ce,cul[ure,and the people i�serves,and
��-�-o��imitted[o Incorporating sustainable des�yn Into each projea she unden,akes. By looking
ARC ARCHITECTS ��i �, bulldlny as an in[eyrated rys[em of deslgn strateyies,she challenu25 our Ceam to provide
���rnova;�ve deslgn solunons. lennlfer has been[he LEED project administra�or on several projects
EDUCATION ,,,,;i -,��lude Saminami5h Commons.Birch Creek Youth Cencer,and Mukil[eo City Hall.
?en�„�,;,.:�:�..:�_ .. .- .
Ma+te�s n'.� i�� •.� -. . . �-,.��ier's expertise a �n communiry and pubGC archirecwre, and has most rec2ntly been
Ba�n �o� oi. . . ��.-'�- ,N��ikinq on prograinn�iing and collabuiat'ive office design for [he Ci_ry of Klrkland the U[ilifies
"I � � � � ��`�`.- �' ' -�- � ., �� "�anspo«ation Commission, Girl Scouu of Western Wash�ngion and King Conservation
C�h;;rii!'. Many of these office piujects indude extensive rehabilitation ef an existing structure,
REGISTRATION �-°� ��prapramm�ng of spaces ID �mprove office wo�k Flo�vs and functio�s whlch centribure
__ �_���_�, �:^.�-av�ly on employee zfficienty,healch and�vell being_
�er experience in housing �ndudes a multl-gene�ational housing developmern tor[he Yakama
Nauon, low-ineome development upgrades and community mnlers for Kinq County Housing
Au:honry,and private revdences throughout Western Washingcon,
�ROJECT MANAGER
� Noelle Galicia eamed her bachelor's deyree in Archilecture in;he Republic of the Philippines.She
:;�'icenreC archltect in her nanve jurisdic[ion,and has gained experience in a variety ofdesign
� -���monments Witn both Fas[ein and Western inFluences m architzciure,she brinqs fresh de;iGn
�������;_.o the[abie and stnves[o be a catalyst in developing new visions of form and space.
'd�.�riie is an experlenced projea ciesi9ner and has been wlth ARC for 10 yeaa and Is respons'ible
ARCARCHITECTS ,-,.�,__hitecturaldesgn,cOnsultantcoordinaDOnandcon5[rucCiondrawings. �hehasa5ignificant
�r.,�ouni or tenan� linprovement work and inter�or renovations, especially in the medical and
EDUCATION heal[hcare field.With he�keen eye and consistent a:ten[ion;o derail,she i>insttumental�uring
" . "-� . F�''����."��'s material and 6nlsh selec[ion,and �s responsible for coord�na�ing w�rh fumiture�epresentatives
'- �- � � - - �� -����� ��•.ia �rocluu suppliers to meei des�Un, budget and sche�y�.iie reqwremenrs. H�r knowledge of
finish materials helps to keep[hz office up-[adat?on the larest design tr=nd5.
REGISTRATION
__ _ -_ ^I��e"�e knows ADA requirements.induding recent Deparcment or Jusoce i,pdares,and is ARC's
,��cessible design speciallst.She strives [o incorpor�i[e Unlversal Design m�o every project and
:�e��eves thai a building can be both accessibie and beau;ilul. Noelle spearheads che in[ernal
ADA review tor ARCs projects.
RE�.E� Page 202 of 210
� -
,� � ,
� �. r..�`�� -
. � .- .;: - _
\
� -- � -- - - - �
�\ � �
\\\\
� � �
��\\,,
;
% \ �
� �., •
��,
�. �.� �
� ,
.�� .
� � �
�
� .
� � �
�: _
� �r.- ; �
�
,
.
�
{
_ _
�
� R age 2
`
yCOPEMANAGEMENT
$coGe and budge[ management are essenuai to every projecCS MANAGING BUDGET
success. ARC's pMlosuphy for con[rouing scope and budgeis
A^ c��ily w��e��,a��,:�nq o`c��e budget defines ;he paramerers
u to manage [hem connnually, from programming lhrougn ,���i�� �v��ich :I ,�i n',�:.���,�;ean Flui,nish. Uecsiuns abuut quallry
ionstruction. Years o( experience working wi!h public dien�„
and users provlde us the[ools [o ensure [ha�cllents understand anu s,ze ov�,i b�g���7ea by nutlge�considera[ions. We m�lntain
pro�en scope, potential cos[ opnons and challenges. Clear a ca�eful eye on [he mm;uucGOn cost e�umare throughuui the
mmmunicatlon and expectauons will lead co successful pmjects. P�^�ess and refine designs in order[^rneet budqet.
We have developed methodologies approprtate to each phase. Our record of m,t eonuol is excepCional. Our esiimales have
Owners are provi�letl wl[h dear documenis, drawings, and averaged wi[hin S�n of bidz and requlracl change orders have
budg�u tliat g��ae eheir deaslon making a�ia aoprovai process. averaqed less than 3°�,, even with over 509n of ou! work as
AR��ensures that the enl'ire proiec�team �s cicar aboui upaa�ed
�eno.-a;ions_T�iese wccesses are oull[upon our management of
��cpr-_ana oudge�.at che beqinning of earn p�»s?. �-��°-�'�-��udqets-
Planning&Programming Cost Estimating
AkC Architec;s'approach to msl estimating is a system of�liecks
!nterv�r;,s an�i meet����ys prov�de Insight�s��nto oeeds z��a r,�shes, and balances,designed �o provide estima�es[hat are sensitive lo
allowing us to allgn scope with budgets and planning level . .
�han�_���ng ma:ke_cond�>�ons
estimates. We develop project costs (hard plus soft costs) Chat
wli! guide decisions and con6ngencles are conservative at thls Independent cost estimates
phase. Owner meetings provide review and ronfirmation of
project goals be(ore tne design team moves forward with des�gn. �"e e^�p�oy an+ndeoenclent cost esumaior whose buslness is ro
p�ov��cle cost esi�maies-We will selec[ thls es[imator with Inpu�
Design iro�n you �n o�der to align our team's skiL and experience wrth
We manage scope creep and work wi[h dien[s on priori[ization Your expectaoons Our es[imaior wlli be expec:ed to a!tend
and �Nith mnsultants m find mst efficiencies. There are olten �zconciliation meenngs if budget and estimate are signincantly
esnma[e reconcllia[ion meenngs m ai�yn owner expectatiuns di`�ereni. Esuma[es ancl proe;ct scope w�i�.be reconc:led before
wi[h budge�.There will be an estimate at the end of each phase,
movinq io the next ohase.
wiih d�mmishing conunyenc�es. We will clevelop aaeutable b!d Consultant review
alternaies thzi provide bid proteaion.
Eacn oi our consul�an[dlsciplines is tasked with ieviewing [he
Construction zs�,cnator's msi esumate, to venfy if es.im,3te, ar� mmpie�e m
From [he beginning, estima[es will indude � reasonable fe"�� oi Rems and quannries, and to chee'- .�,��,e;hc- ��; a��.-:
const�ruaion contingency. We carefully revlew change order ove�a��coss allgn w'uh the�r recent expenence.
proposais and moniror owner desqn changes. Quahry Managing Budget and Schedule During Construction
consuuction documents mimmize cosdy chanyes. ARC has an
excellent track record for minlmal chanye orclers, wiih typical I[ is i�muortant to dvoio �elavs ana �osi uve��wis dur'��y
Z'?�-4�k required change orders on public projeca. rons;ruaion. ARC ovorks with our diena on zaecifications -hat
indude the con[iactor's sd�eduling responsibiiities and will
review those scnedules a[ zach field m2eting and documen[
them in ou� field meeting no[es Change orde� proeosals w�ll b�
�
reviewed in detail[o derermine wheiner lhev are fairly priced and
whether 1he�e are!ess expensive ways[o achieve ine same result.
�� � � Our goal �s ro min�mim change orders and prese�ve mnstruaion
' '� � � � � conlingeocy or,il�esired,use ie for alcemates that may not have
° � been accepred dur�ng oidd!ng.
. � r.
� �
. 0. . .,,., m• . �. . . • � . . _, _.
RE�.�� Page 204 of 210
PROJECT MANAGENIENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES/A& E ROSTER
AU,USr 2013
Project managemenl iz about manaying all of your and o�r QUALITYASSURANCE
expectaC�ons for ihe projea. h �s alw�ys impor[an� ro have c'e_r
bL I� �,r.c�n io� ireat.ul q�dPlv mntrol an�l will lailor Uv'Se[0
CU�71i71unlctlipnCC:tb���RBallprnieclni?�nbersun<Yir ��j5m;.ir�, -
, i .i'i�,�i.
9 . ...... _>- .... , .. 'r:.
Design
CONSULTANTS .- , o�:-a �� i., ::� nn� ,., _ � �. �' c. a ,=,_ ..
W m��a i i � eon+Wta it, idri;c_�p��,bud�}���i.�nd _i �ndirsr,
V�e will woik wi � vo6� io ae�e�m��e over�i pi.��ec�de �n goals
h�,�.�,�,a .:alon. We�v�ll worti w tn you on szieu o�i of the and s[rateg��es. 'Ne wtll ha�ie o�ficz crioques durinq concep[
nghi mnsWtant team for each pro�ecL We have a stable of sub-
developmen,Co make sure des�gn Ideas are s[rong,creadve,and
consul[an�s,manyolwhlchhavespecialtyareasonwhlchlodr��n. ma•.ch vour o�oiect�oals. 3� cnmpuier �odels will be r.sed [o
- �. ,. ��_a.N � �o����:.e :,���.��vo��.: i .
We can also suggesi connitan;s For vour con>IderaGOn :o m��;�, ` --�
,he v�?ur W n nn n�i�!41 � ������Owned liusine,ti En �i �,�-,��n,d�. Controlling Errors of Omission
To cr�n�,rc e«_,r;of oaii,s�o��, Ih�= princip�l an11 proiea indnaqei
MANAGING SCHEDULE keep uppated ,�npE p?rmdt.a•id space p'ograi*�Chac�,lists. We
condua w:th our mnsul[ams mulupie s�te v�9ts rhat test the
ARC uses a robust sche�:IW��ng;vs_em wh�e�alluvv�u:,tu niana�a� deSign against exisl�ing conditlons. Published checklists are also
mul[iple projeas slmWtaneously,wh�le provld�ng[allored serv'.ce used to assure comple;eness of the design and documenlation.
,a each diern and projec[ In orderm serve proje�[s we'�,we�004
attl�e overall of�5ce so�eauie wvch ��,,iiuc�.ured i�pu�� in�fv�d��i�� ControllingTechnical Errors
_ -.� �� -_ �--�� --� "o contro'� �eC�in�ca� errors, an experienced project manager not
Individual Project Schedules involved in the pro�ect reviews drawings and specifications fo�
�,lari�v, completeness. and aoss referencing. We have multiple
��. ;,ro;c-�. . �,�ac-� r�=. ,,�r� e � � �,0-7,�,��,- �,-.i�,�� in� engineerin� review meetings to ensure coordlnatlon across
every proiecL We ttaJ<azch t<isk by p'�+se, �de��:u, Jr'�ve�ab�,rs, disclpllnes. Our in-house ADA expert will revlew drawinys fo�
document key m�lestones, and �nduue owner meeilroas,design code and Ua�iry. AnC also works wi�h technical assistance(•om
revlew,agency reviews,and permrtting de�dllnes.Thls schedule is manutacCur�iC r�rprese��iatives. And finally,ARCs core tcam will
regularly updat'ed and shared wlth the owner�nd deslgn team so he re,p�,n,l�I=_�i,, su�r�r��arions and checkinu final documents.
that everyone understands[heii tasks and respqnsbilities to meet Const�uction Management
milesiones and deadlines.
Office Schedule Qcai��tv ass�.,ra��e:ao��� ����,,us�ni��a pro�ect Is mmplete. The ARC
projea managei�±nd F:.�.�ripai involved in each projecl will have a
We mai^tain an overall ofhce schedule Yoi oui des�gn sraH based s[rong presence�7u�mci cons[ruc:ion[o assure that the contrac[�r
�nallprojeaswirhintheo5c�e. Vrojectsin[heofficescheduleare and [he�r ceam budds wha[ was des�gned. ARC prinopals are
strucwred around the par[�cular phases and phase duraiions for involved In contractadministranon and managem�nt.�o provtde
each projec[. The schedule Is updared weekly and rev�esved at a high level of oversight and to help conirol nsk.
ourweeklyofficemeeong.Thisa[ren[ion[oscheduleandsharing qRCexcelsatconsvuctionadminr,[ra;ion, Weovlllbeinvolvedin
of ne=ds allows us to albca*e staff fully and to address the needs all construaion field meet�ngs,where xhedule, re9ulateiy, and
oCali pro�ects,
construction issues are disc�ssed and moni�ored, and will issue
mee�ing no[e; In a tlmely fash�on. We wid manaye the design
�earris responses to RF1's,chan�e order proposals.and submit�:als
in ortler ro help the contractor ineet tlieir schedule. We ar�
re,aons��ve a�d " u-�, :hr�i i ,���ess5, v �,_�t eooio�N�q�i.
I
RES.E Pa�er2b5 of 210
THANKYOU
FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
a r c ARCHITECTS
RES.E Page 206 of 210
IAUBURN YOUTH CENTER AND COMMUNITY CENTER
TASK / SCOPE DESCRIPTION September 25, 2014�
� — — — — — �
A/E FEE $1,031,485
- -
� _ ��marks _ I
TASK 1 - SCHEMATIC DESIGN 30% I 17% I $175�352 I
Two City Council Meetings brainstorming and options I �'
�Two Community Meetings brainstorming and options
ITwo Client Engagement Meetings
IOne ClienUTeam Brainstorming Meeting brainstorming, options, eco-charrette
Individual Outreach Meetings 8 total
I I our of Centers day to be confirmed �
IProgramming rooms, sizes, adjacencies I
2-3 Design Optioins w ROM Estimates one and two story studies
- -- - - — — _ —.
Preferred Option
drawings
basis of design T
outline specifications
estimate
IReview by client representatives
�enderings PR / outreach
TASK 2 - DESIGN DEVELOPMENT I — - I
60%
17% $175,352 I
�City Council Meeting design review
iCommunity Meetings design review
Client Engagement Meetings technical and design reviews
ILEED Certification
50% DD team coordination
drawings, all consultants
�outline spec, all consultants
100% DD
drawings, all consultants I
� outline spec, all consultants I
estimate
i Review
RES.E Page 207 of 210
- - - I
TASK 3 - PERMITTING AND
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS 35% $361,020 I
�(100%) I
• City Council Meeting design review
Community Meetings design review I
Client Engagement Meetings technical and design reviews
iLEED Certification
50% CD team coordi�ation and permitting
Idrawings, all consultants
specifications
Permitting SEPA, building, land use, etc.
I100% DD
drawings, all consultants
specifications
estimate
TASK 4- BIDDING 2% $20,630
'IQuestions �
Addenda based on questions
iBid Opening �
TASK 5 - CONSTRUCTION 27% $278,SU1 I
I Meetings weekly �
Submittals /Shop Drawings
I Requests for Information I
Pay Requests monthly
IPunch and Backpunch site and building
LEED Certificatio� ongoing
— — - II i
�TASK 6 - PROJECT CLOSEOUT I 2% $20,630 �
Record Drawings digital and mylar
— �
O and M Manuals consultanYs review by discipline
IWarranty walk-through one-year after substantial completion
RES.E Page 208 of 210
AUBURN YOUTH CENTER AND COMMUNITY CENTER
CONSULTANT TEAM
BASIC
ARC Architects - architecture
KPFF — structural engineering
FSi — mechanical engineering and commissioning
Travis Fitzmaurice— electrical engineering
SPECIALTY
KPFF —civil engineering
Swift Company— landscape architecture
Clevenger Associates —food service
SSA Acoustics — acoustic / AV design
DCW Cost Management— cost estimating
Fermata — sustainable design
Heffron Transportation — traffic and parking analysis
RES.E Page 209 of 210
�.AUBURNVOUTHITEENCENTERANDCOMMUNRYCENTER T�u1NZ11
IOfiAFT SCHEpULE
IID Tas�Name WnHw 8Urt A��
� � NE ScoPing antl Contracl n an F�B2Wia . ��o . o , � u . . � � . c a � o , . � . . , . .
� Scope Pmject,Assembie Desian Team ie aap F��.fl2s�u m ��
0 LesGOVeCOmmittee oaaye weaiavi� i�•�
� FnenceCommiftee otlays Mm�wfyt� 7��+
S Conhd[t-COUnci!Revl¢w OEays Mon16fY1� �w
� �
� In�o�mation 3aaaw �n&29n� �n
e Existing Drawirgs t wx rn erzsn� ���•�
9 H3zardou5 Matenalg$mvey 5 wks Mon Li5i1� ^��'��
' ta 9�e5urvey 5x4s MaflnSiu ���w^�
� 11 Geotxh5urvey Sws MonBitfdf� "��h�'+r
I �_
» Schematic Dssign 3U% 6l asys n�m iMUU ��
�� Q�ent Engaqeaen4 Stak Level Prqect Overview oaays mon taau •'+�
is CiryCOUncil�Brainstormin9anAVisualTour Omp n�onimivf� f��
�6 Communlq YC antl JrCG Broinstorm��ng oaays wed tais�u :�^'+
» ChentlDesignTeam-Brainstammg/ECOChartetle oaeys ntonioaau �!d
� u SD-OpGOns I ROM EsOmates 3 w+s Tua 10rztnl ��L��^�
i9 ClientEngagement-OptionsantlESlime[es omn Monivi0ru '�
�a CiryCOUncil-OptionsandEStimates Ooays inuw�3n� •:��^�
�� Communiry YC and JrCC�Optrons antl Estimates o..MS inu�trzau ���,m
t2 50-COmP�te 2wks infl2ttl� ��m�
�3 OwnerRenewo(SD lwiu iniLyt� �
�� Renaerings �wxs cntv5�i� +
15
a6 Design Devebpmen160% W 5 aays fn m9u
�� DO-COmmence �whs vniv5�1� .b+1�r�
xe Chen[Engagement-Design Rev�ew o eays mu v�n5 :�+
is OD-Re�ineantlESUmate a5vns Fn1R115 w�����
w CiryCounnl-DesgnReview oeen Tuetrz�n5 i�++
» Comm�nily.VC and JrCC-Design Review Oaays inu irz5n5 ��+�
�, �� ��-GOmpletew/EStima�e �»ks Tnu1rz9n5 ���^+
» OwnerReviewefDD t..�s muxnwts v���i+
N ��5 ConahucHOnDOCUmanIS100% Boeays muviWiS �+
�fi C0.COmm¢nC¢ fixMS TIwti19115 �+��1
I » ClienlEigagement-DasignRaview Oaays inu4nH5 y��^+ v.
� C�-RefineanaEStimaie fiwks Thu�RHS �
09 CiryCounce-Pro�xtS�atus O.ns muv��i5 .�
�0 CO-COmpl2�e 4wts Thu5/1U15 ul���ln�
�1
�� PalTll 6vAS TnuU2115
b w�r,u
' w BltlAing s.n�a inudnn5
I .s ,.L
k ConlNCt 3whf Tnux119q5 � �
Q
b Con��luCHOn IXIUays TM�&615
I �9 COnSWG�ion <O�s inu6N15 „� •i
� Gommissloning 2 wks iM1U 5/ix/t6 n�i uu"�,
61 Move-In 1 vna Tnu SRY16 un j��
63
6� OpeningofGan�en OMS TM1U65tb
�
� 65 p�OJOCIClosaOul B»xa mud9n6 w
__ _ _ -- ��
RES.E Page 210 of 270