The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6541 ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 4 1 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON; RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Manageriment Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Aubum City Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn published in the Seatf/e Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 6, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received two privately-initiated map amendments (File Nos. CPA14-0002 & CPA14-0003) however these applications were not complete for processing; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated five text/policy amendments (File No. CPA14-0001); and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments were processed by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2014 amendments to the City of Aubum Comprehensive Plan; and Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 1 WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2014 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP14-0011); and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's o�cial newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on November 5, 2014, conducted a public hearing on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing the Aubum Gity Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2014 Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and WHEREAS, on November 10, 2014, the Planning and Community Development Committee of fhe Aubum City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations made a recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 17, 2014, 4he Public Works Committee of the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations; and Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 2 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2014, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The 2014 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA14-0001), are adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached heretb and incorporated herein by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "A" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school districYs Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts bofh fhe Planning Commission's recommendations, dated November 5, 2014, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 6, 2014, staff report, attached as Exhibit '`B". Section 2. The 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703 and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995. Section 3. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is de.signated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 3 Section 4. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative proce.dures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. NOV 1 7 2014 INTRODUCED: PASSED: NOV 1 7 2014 APPROVED: NOV 17 2014 ancy Back MAYOR ATTEST: /�� ,��-� Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APP ED A TO FORM: D � B. Heid, City Attorney Published:�,�,��ca�l`,Cc�G�-�"�-��! °2��°�`� -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 4 Exhibit "A" The Aubum, Dieringer, Federal Way and Kent School District Capita/ Facilities P/ans, City of Aubum Capital Facilities P/an, (See "Comp. Plan PolicvLText Amendments" tab in the working binder, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, which copy is incorporated herein by this reference ) -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 5 � • • • � . • ' � � :�� , � :�,. � .� : _ _'�h� � � , l � �I�� .�� :�-E�, .. � � ' ,�� ;a�, � �-��, �, .°�.- .t,� , .� �y �- . ,— � ,� ��,, � , �,�. ' � � iPd ` 51 . '`� �. �� .�.y� �,�� :a,� � tir � � `�,. ��`�'_rw - r�j� � �\ _ ___._.= ' � .�� 1,� �, , �� , �,;,� �w•,� c;� �� .� ��{��< <� � �y�1 � � � �''j!1! �,r; `' ��P""-- '\�'�I, ��y• _ .�. f ' �`` ��,.,� .��. <_t--� , � „ ' f .1 , � � � . � , � � `-' Z �r-��'�,�� .� ��eS`w' -' .—x ��- . . .. �-. ` �i� < Y� / �'�_.u_ L."�7�S��j�� y�� , � J`�u✓�. � =�-- � �i/I� :�%�� I ',i 'N. a� —5:,� "•`s- � -+` s t� I� ��i t��i'a}�j'�'� i� i�f)i ; i� _ � l�: � u ��ne� i. .i �t,� i , 1 L t� . �;III � _✓ � c..l _ { Ci �J.�p�I'��iY < �� T '. �.1 � �� 1 !�f �� '^l.:� T- �i �� i� � I . � � ��iar��J ,� � ��1r i'��` f:-: � \ +'�, +1_ �, s4<'. ' f � I�'� � I �� r �: f `,� ��;� _ . .,.� �,. � a ✓.n,j , . , ( _ _ ��;� �:_�� - _ '� �'%-; �=_G , - i , . �i,-� ,.`.� _- .., , .., _ _ ; _ � -- . "�.`" _--:�. .1:�..�- ��::.. —.� ��:- .� ' ` • • � - � � � o • � C � . • • \ • 1 �� SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE - EDUCATE • EMPOWER 915 Fourth Street NE Aubum, Washington 98002 (253) 931-4900 Serving Students in: Unincorporated King County City of Auburn City of Algona City of Kent City of Pacific City of Black Diamond BOARD of DIRECTORS Ray Vefik Lisa Connors Carol Seng Anne Baunach Laurie Bishop Dr Dennis Kip Herren, Superintendent Table of Contents Section I Executive Summary Page 1 Section II Enroliment Projections. Page 6 Section III Standard of Service. Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities. Page 15 Section V Pupil Capacity Page 19 Section VI Capital Construction Plan. Page 22 Section VII Impact Fees. Page 26 Section VIII Appendices. Page 30 Appendix A.1 -Student Enrollment Projections Page 31 Appendix A.2-Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 45 Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey Page 50 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section I Executive Summary Aubum School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 I. Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") has been prepared by the Auburn School District(the "District") as the DistricYs principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities.served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2014 This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the DistricYs needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Aubum arid City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Aubum and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction's respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Aigona, Pacific and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, the Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly The Plan estabiishes the DistricYs "standard of service" in order to ascertain the DistricYs cuRent and future capacity While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the DistricYs specific needs. In general, the Districfs current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 25 students and 20.3 students for school designated as serving high poverty areas; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 27 stuclents; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 30 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 24.8 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based,on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The DistricYs 2013-14 capacity was 13,203. The actual number of individual students was 14,971 as of October 1, 2013. (See Section V for more specific information.) 2 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modemization to the DistricYs existing facilities. This provided for a new high school, Aubum Mountainview, approved by the voters in February 2003 and opened in September 2005, and the addition of two new elementary schools approved by the voters in February 2005; with Lakeland Hills Elementary opening in the Fall of 2006 and Arthur Jacobsen Elementary opening in the Fall of 2007 The plan includes the construction of a new middle school and a new elementary school, as well as the acquisition of a future school site to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected student population increase to be generated from the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, the Lea Hill, and the north Auburn valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The City of Kent has an area of approximately 158 acres that was sold to developers in 2004. The economic downtum has slowed development in these areas, but recent new coristruction is beginning to pick back up. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities and in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilitie.s and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommeridations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009 Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the Fall of 2011 the school board determined to move fonvard with the Aubum High School Modemization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012 the school board determined to rerun the bond again in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62% and construction for the Auburn High School Modernization and Fteconstruction Project began on February 25, 2013. Phase 1 of the three phase project is nearing completion. Approximately 60% of the total new building area will be occupied by Aubum High School studerits and staff in the fail of 2014 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Aubum and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dweiling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments coristructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for multi-family in 2013 and 2014. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS; and to integrate the mapping with student data from the DistricYs student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is coritained in Appendix A.3. 3 Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN zo�a cnro�en soso EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2013 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2014 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section i Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Increase of 11 full-day kindergarten classrboms at elementary level. B. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 25 to 20.3 students at 11 elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 2 portables at Lakeland Hills Elementary B. Remove 7 portables at Auburn High School due to the Auburn High School Modemization and Rec.onstruction Project. C. Add 2 portabies at Alpac Elementary D Add 1 portable at Dick Scobee Elementary E. Add 1 portable at Evergreen Heights Elementary F Add 2 portables at Gildo Rey Elementary G. Add 2 portables at Hazelwood Elementary H. Add 2 portables at Ilalko Elementary I. Add 2 portables at Pioneer Elementary J. Add 1 portable at Terminal Park Elementary K. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary Section V Pupil Capacity Removal of seven portable classrboms from Aubum High School results in a reduction in student capacity of 210 students (7 classrooms x 30 students per ctassroom). No change in student capacity results from the 16 additional elementary school portables which meet facility needs resulting from transition to full day kindergarten and class size reduction rather than increased enroliment. 4 Aubum School Dis6tict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2013 to 2014 - - CPF CPF - - DATA ELEMENTS 2013 2014 EXPLANATION Student Generation FacWrs Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2270 0.1650 Student Generation Factors are calculated Mid School 0.0850 0.0760 by the school district based on district Sr High 0.1290 0.0890 records of average actual student generation Muiti-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.1720 0.2230 over the last five years. Mid School 0.0700 0.0910 Sr High 0.0960 0.0920 School Construction Costs Elementary $25,000,000 $29,800,000 Updated estimates for 2014. Middle School $48,800,000 $52,800,000 Updated estima;es for 2014. Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $308,155 $356,728 Updated estimate on land costs. Area Cost Allowance aoeckn mde: $200.40 $200.40 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2013) Match % -State 59.19% 62.31% Updated to current SPI schedule. Match % -District 40.81% 37.69% Computed District Average AV Single Family $199,919 $210,210 Updated from March 2014 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $75,278 $78,449 Updated from March 2014 King Counry Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.11 $2.12 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.74% 4.38% Current Rate(Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 -Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2013 Appendix A.2-Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from March 2014 Appendix A.3-Student Generation Survey April 2014 5 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan zo,a m�o�9n zozo Section II Enrollment Projections Aubum Sehool District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2074 through 2020 ENROLLMENTPROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to projeot future enrollment for all of the DisVicYs operations. Table 11.1 is an eMract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A:2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections" This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous 6 year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the disVict as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT 11.1 PROJECTIONS March 2074 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 201&19 2019-20 GRADE Actual Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro'ected. Pro'ected P.ro'ected KDG 1170 1215 1258 1300 1342 '1381 1417 1 1188 1230 1272 1315 1357 1397 1432 2 1124 1211 1250 1293 1335 1375 1410 3 1125 1142 1227 1266 1308 1348 1384 4 1123 1163 1178 1263 1302 1341 1377 5 1075 1147 1185 1200 1284. 1321_ 1357 K-5 - - 6805 - - - 7108 7370 7637 7928 8163 - --8377 6 1076 1088 1157 1195 1210 1292 1324 7 1072 1106 1116 1186 1224 1236 1314 8 1116 1083 1115 1125 1194 1229 1238 6-8 3264 3277 3388 3506 3628 3757 3876 9 1159 1301 1267 1300 1310 1378 1409 10 1229 1171 1312 1277 1311 1319 1381 11 1240 1221 1160 1300 1266 1296 1299 12 1274 1313 1291 1232 1371 1335 1360 9- 12 4902 5006 5030 5109 _ _ 5258_ _._ 5328_ 5449 TOTALS 14,971 15,391- - 15,788 16,252 -16,614 17,248 - --17.702 GRADES K=12 Actual Pro ected Pro ected Pro'ected Pro'ected Pro ected Pro ected K-5 6805 7708 7370 7637 7928 8163 8377 6-8 3264 3277 3388 3506 3628 3757 3876 9-12 4902 5006 5030 5109 5258 5328 5449 _K�12 _ 14,971 15,391 15,788 16,252 16,814 17,246 17,702 Note: The Districfis currently operating Full Day Kindergarten in fourteen eiementary schools. This includes State funded Full Day Kindergartens at ten elementary schools. The State projects to fully implement Full Day Kindergarten by 2018. 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014through 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School lmpact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that eaqh school district must establish a "Standard of Service"in order to ascertain the overal!capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendeni of Public Instruction establishes square fo6tage capacity"guidelines for computing state funding suppoR. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehide to equitably disfribute state matching funds for school consWction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the districf's capacity to house its student population. The SP! guidelines do not make adequate provision for loca!district program needs, facility configuratioris, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each studenYs educational program. The Au6urn School Disfrict Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space !n excess of the SPI guidelines. The efiect on the space requireinents for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade artioulation pattem. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 6,805 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,264 students in giades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 4,902 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS S/ZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have sign�cant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 24.8 students per teacher Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities ar8 set at 24.8 studerits per room at.grades K-5. At grades 6-12 the limit is set at 30 pupiis per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level,less the computed reduction for the Aubum School Dishict Standard of Service, determines the DistricYs capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPEClAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which curzently uses ten classrobms to provide for 96 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guideiines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level.The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 24.8 each = (25) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (25)—- 9 Aubum Sch'ool District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPEClAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program.The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rboms @ 24.8 each = (174) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 'I'otal Capaciry Loss (174) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates two resource rooms to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. Two standard classrooms are fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 2 rooms @ 24.8 each = (50) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (50) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1%2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary ciassrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 24.8 each = (74) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (74) EARLYCHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District ope�ates a pre-schobl program for young children with disabilities below age five. This program is housed at seven different elementary schoois and currently uses 10 standard classrooms.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 24.8 each = (248) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (248) READ/NG LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standarii classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom.The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 24.8 each = (99) Loss of Temporary Capaciry 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (99) 10 Auburn ScFiool Disfict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 throu9h 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUS/C ROOMS The Distrid elementary music programs require one acousticaily modfied classroom at each elementary school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 24.8 each = (347) Loss of Temporary Gapacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (347) - EIVGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for studgnts lea�ning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are riot provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 24.8 each = (347) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.85 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (347) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Aubum School Distrid provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This prograrii requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permarient Capacity 8 rooms @ 24.8 each = (198) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (198) ELEMENTARY LEARN/NG SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Aubum School District provides a learning specialist program to increase Iiteracy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currenUy has the specialist going into existing teacher classrboms, as well as pulling out studenfs into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schoois. Loss of Permarient Capacity 14 rooms @ 24.8 each = (347) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (347) FULL DAYKINDERGARTEN The Auburn School District provides Full-Day Kindergarten programs to increase academic skills for kindergarten students. This program model has been created from tuition, Title I funds, LAP funds, and currently there are ten schools receiving state funding for 2013-14 school year l'he district is utilizing 50 classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Housing requirements exceed the OSPI space guidelines for this program by 25 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 25 rooms @ 24.8 each = (620) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (620) 11 Aubum School DisVict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 tlirough 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASS/STANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides an Early Childhood Education program to meet local needs for disadvantaged students. The State has fund an increase of 12 ECEAP seats. This program will require one new classrooms for 2014-15. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 24.8 each = (25) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 24.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (25) MIDDLE SCHOOLS SPECIAL.EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middie school level. This is to accommodate special educatiomstudents needing remedial instruction to address their spec'rfic disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the riyo classrooms for this program are prbvided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) M/DOLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each middle school.This program utilizes a standard classroom per middle school. The housing requirements for this program are not prbvided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The AubuFn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rboms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) 12 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2074 through 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes eiective options inspecial interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utiliiation of all available teaching stations. SPI Report#3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-levei faciiities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximatefy 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss - (240) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS SEN/OR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schoois. This program utiliies two standard classrooms at cbmprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for students learning English as a second language. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guideliries. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District,offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Aubum School District operates nine structured_learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are riot provided for in the SPI space guideiines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Gapacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Cap'acity Loss - -(150) - 13 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2074 through 2020 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Aubum School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 10 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capaciry 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center The SPI Inventory inciudes this space when computing unhoused student capacity This space was not intended for nor is it usable for classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) STANDARD OF SERVlCE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity= (2,554) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,554) MIDDLE SCHOOL �oss of Permanent Capacity= (600) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (600) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capaciry= (1,330) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,330) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity= (4,484) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,484) 14 Aubum School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section IV F i Inv nto of acil fiies e � Auburn School DisVict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20'14 throu8h 2020 INVENTORY OF PACILITIES Table IV 1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by schooi. The district uses relocatable faciiities to: I 1 provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school I populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until perma�ent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable sVess on existing physical plants. Core facilities(i.e. gymnasiums, resVooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.)are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatabie classrooms. Table PermanentFacilfties District School Facilities IV 1 @ OSPI Rated Capaciry (December2013) Buildin Ca acit Acres Address Elementa Schools Washin ton Elementa 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast,Aubum WA,96002 Tertninai.P.ark Elementa 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast,Aubum WA,98002 Dick Scobee Elementa 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast,Auburn WA,98002 Pioneer Elementa 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast Aubum WA,98002 Chinook Elementa 440 8•75 3502 Aubum Wa .South,Aubum WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementa 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast,Aubum WA,98092 Gildo Re Elementa 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast,Auburn WA 96002 Ever reen Hei hts Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th Aubum WA,98001 AI ac Elementa 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard-North, Pacific WA,98047 Lake Vew.Elementa 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street,Aubum WA,98092 Hazelwood Elementa 580 �Z•6� 11815 Southeast 304th SVeet Aubum WA 98092 Ilalko-Elementa 585 �Z•�� 301 Oravetr Place Southeast,Aubum WA,98092 Lakeland Hills Elementa 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE,Aubum WA,98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementa 614 10:00 29205132""St�eet SE,Aubum WA,98092 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Sehools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th SVeet NoRheast, Aubum WA,98002 OI m ic Middle.School 921 17 40 �gp5 K Street Southeast,Aubum WA,98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26:33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast,Aubum WA.98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 3Q�88 620 37th$treet Southeast Aubum WA,98002 MS CAPACITY 3,430 Senior Hi h Schools West Aubum Hi h School 233 5:10 401 West Main SVeet Aubum WA 98001 Aubum Senfor Hi h 2 101 �8•6� 800 Fourth Street Northeast,Aubum WA,98002 Aubum Riverside HS 1 387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road,Aubum WA, 98092 Aubum Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 2gg00 124'^Ave SE,Aubum WA,98092 SH CAPACITY 5 164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 16 �.cr3-�g t ' ; . y;� �� : �� S e . z�i� �'is , s � L'e�a, - ,r, . -.n .'_K i , � _ ��a -��. ? _ -- 'i '�'-:��._ _ l rE i r 'r -1;� , �..w � ` �� .. .. � .. � .. Gwm I�_ .��'��- �ry, .� �.� �1 �... Y 1 ' i y . : �7ti y. + • � y � e � •W'^ � c � f" ;!�• o � 'c. �� (�_,. 1 �� t� , �� 1� MF � ., � rf 3 ,r,p �,� �r. .K:L+'��`_ • �..��...0 m ��?2 _ ��, 6�:'. i `iol�t �,..�. i i} '�v ��,� i��I p, .5� , �• "'xY"^� ,-i�l,' .,� : I �'e� �. dA�a ` 1 o- , . - - •Y � r �. sA4 iy 15'� I . ..i,,ji�ry�,. . � .. 1 -�S �ofTq�ef� � g...��'7ri ___ c� .s �� `�.�� f� Yij a:�� _a. _ _ w _ §, _y:._�"t�: -� 1 ��y�,�'� la� �� .s-�� 5��yj� � . - e�T�� ri� _�_.--_ � , '�s- 5 � .. .L.�...�5ci i `�°i ` � .:.3 .. �. � f�aC ,.`96y�. �� z i �1- '�_. � «. �y��P�� '+f � ._/" i:� J �•�' � �i.lm I.' �� i51 - � ♦ `i�rm i.;� ; az .��e;3�� '� � i: " '__ � e �tl�Q yl�"�i-s��" � x�ly�. �� Pa E y ' / . a . . '� � ., . µ.: � ,,�� eex q S i�ij . � ' � . .___j s� ..f ,� �..�. ; ? [� :ti r �.�.�a• �. ,"� . 1 �� §;. i.. ri��a.�ap_yril.� :._'E' 3 ;� a kau.J, �A l ��!�^�i `9 �_. . / _ +_ .v..r ' : a y�`-, ._ .4___..�- ' _-4y � " 7L�� ,3: ��s„ a.-,' s � i� ' a $ z�a. 7,yJ�� V-. $� ' � �- - �� ,."r � t. s �_�,,,_�e .__ ` � w � �r,. '� .� �i�` . j G d � � 165e� s"'- ' ,, �.",'�' : _ �� g .i - ._ � .�'` . ` . _. -�Y� �y �, � ' C a`� ° � _I i �f. .. �`' i`�_ �.�"t � ' a y y a � � isl�..��' ��,��.5 .�''y,t�•� -'-�#� �Mijrtl i � � i( ��p,,;. �_Y —. .i�*� ..�., a / .. � +' I � 'r"`"y , � °��` ='t;� '' � ;��'• �� ✓' "si �'d .: 7 f'+� k � \ LL�___ .�"�".fa � � �li ;C. :�C I i � i j i �� o � Lryn� �-"' I r �K_ i �J,�i .,1°�F �'�r �� i/ 1� � \ q _ ��. � � I ' .t� �-c �� c. y.�� __ � y_ _ _. 1,_ •`��y`" _. Q - wr 5 - `� vr-c; �x , / t - '��, k�. 5 �y '"� 1 i �i-r Ent. , ._� 1_An�YWlaeai�: i r.� - �`"9. uL�� g �>.n� ..'4a� �i�� q . S/ y Y�� 'tb +u„� y ��j.�_ • q �[ y m.� � �Ri� '.s�S", C i� . �y� t �J'�~�'f°"Cnutwru ��. :�I� \� I. .��°, �•. y. C F� n.i� ��_ �yl� ��ee ce. � I .r R4'e�}' �, `c 'j � /+•+ ' �'� x�34Y, 4 � � . 5F, . YF {i .. 1 ' .v.E I � ` 2 �' �7' . 1 , '� �1�\ g � �� au// - - .� �i .,. c�.�o .y� �J i��F Y�U i `' �a: � .Ft'. �� f E"_ q -� �� . � '-�"�� w 3�} i� � Ji7�l., � � ��\. s�,'`'' i� ' ��'fb� � ; -.I= l + —' ---� `_' _._-+c � �.. t __� un..=:'-,�(� ,�ff_ � - - - ��',t��..�,� � 8 �� 1 rG` , A` q '' , , . i y' �`:i"'�`'a'i�. ��e .} .eS. a� ��.. :?,.. � +� 'S," �i I - f _ �..._�"�' '� ., i ` i�i f � ti( ��N.r. ' Ht' �i.�. � �� ! ��l �f �� s (T�` .s.-. '�j� , I �u�� i I �, , ..\ .Sc � ,e , �'�� s�. %� `li1F_.�°'^" \ � • �'*�' � � ' `I (f'S i I �Ta li -��1 ��: � / � d i I ' � , � � � r' •�L � 1 I 1 B � x., �yf� . ''� � w}�S�,Tt ! t �1� ; � �1 � �r• �. :a ..� '� i .a'9 :u�''Q 'i { -s^.,E-' r' ' e � ��i �b,). 1 `, _ + I e� �; � 'y { � ..!` 'W ' � . � �o-C��.... �1i- :� '�f --�� `��I� � l; 4�. � �` \�� ' ,-,� ii�� ' :�; i v 1-. � � � _ p�� _ q '- . . ic.�. � � �u- �r..v _ � � �� _ .-� ' � �-L'j a y ��S.�j'.� �'�� - �� . �� `�° ? 2a�.. �A�I � �_ ��t �� ' } j •. / � s�� -,-�, -�1 5'�- _ i __Q^i s � � a��= M t r.�'u.w .MOfpnvlll � .� �� a "�=&�. � ..="`�Li- �� ,�I � 5 e�c:. :" • r r ------ � . 3 # -- }- -�� J _�l r ,i- - _ 1 J _. �L ,, } � . " � 4 M I� I � ,�, C p "z'1 t -' ' � � - _� �yQ ' � � � „ ,!� //__ �/ � 'S.' F -.A �.. a �� ';''� � ' : � � �'�u � , b �' � �\�• °�'� �.' ti_. s 9µ , ��, , ;� ;� �°� �,�—�� • '�,,�-��''� 1� y = � . , ' , ' ` � ; � �� . \,� . y � '' �'i � ` - � ��., ' ,-' " � „ � ,� ° i . ' ��J�, 9 l �. �\ �� _ __ �a-�}' ,°�- _. . . �` ` , _ } � � }ti i $, �'e •� '�,. r � i ' , ' ,r ' t � � f ,� . " " � c" '� �ll� � �.1 �� - - I �� ', ' _''__._ "�t_ � .�� {, +� co c ,��s � a \�_� � � ��3a> - - �� . . �i � ., s e '. - n . I Y x � y�^,'�J _ — - _� / I f 1 �� F� 1\ { t n • �_ �C� . , ' . r � ' -r � � ( _— � , _ � s • � " ;� � . .��..' � _ '�'tr� � 3 ,� �c: �$� r�.., �r, � � �„� .�. j � :�"� ', -��a�a K oia�'o�N� � ,�, � � � . �`g� � �'. ,..��.o ��, ¢ �re .. � ' t I � � �� p� � � '"�'� f' .. __ _< u�u.�. _ �� I�.tiR i . .� _ . � � � _ � _ f �� a_i T�� ,r� � al `\ �g�� -�—R'w. � .•.-. . . .f�i •� .%� �.R ` j ' �n� � � � � ��_y - e� t :'� / BLei`D`I�m�< �___� �'. �, �i fi � i_ rw�q f, - � " Al� , U3R1� �� `� ';`�,�- �,�;J %I � � �„,f,,� � �"� � pk``� ' :�'�� , � � , , .� «� '�s. ,' ' � t ' ___- „ � ` -ii-� - " u -t;' ��i " � `� .i � 9b=. - x5 a ' i � . � }m��it � �l � . ' . ., . 'a ' WCRlESNOPi 3 2 'rti� .n . �.. G j ' . ` .,�+-�e __ _�_ - ' _____ _ — 3:?��,.5 ¢ .�- 't"' r,i` ,�'py�' ,� . . .V -�� -fs _ '._' __ i � '! �� I �,�, �0t :�. �f � , ,I�a,. PF� ; v� .:�.:�.. . i_._ �'�i � \ /I � !�7�{�� iz ��,'�y7' �.;�. � __ eH9�lp�.r.,/� �l l'7i% �. I I '� � � � �\. r �� r �. �tJ � . 1� � - � ; . 1� I . �� ! i 'Ir.�� r � � ' ' I r' t ,___ �f�CiM..�- _ \ _ _ � `� � _ . . , , � '- a� �: ..rt �, •- . � � • , s g ' � ; . � i .ei.av., ' ,- "-�- t -• : . M &�a y�: •1� 'F D- � `� .i '.r� �l{f lJ �-F��J�}`�"1` � ,_ G �D . �,.\� 0 •n �� '-'ti, '� � t x krlry'!e�., � r -.� ye C'. • ' i � ��\ , 'l t � "] .�r;;'g � t �� L t � � • -t� i�� ,,'!,�'; �� - -r ��j �P�^, '.'s"'a � � �� ' - (� .l i L � �.-�..i'`�.;,_ � P -t 1 uPo�n �_f � Fk1i�o� l R�� <z,'��:.i `�1� 1,.� ,(�°� \+ .; Y - � ,/,. "�'� . : r. .•� 4 �1;,_ �' � . . �, i I we� HIOIAN _ _ _ __ r �___.___ _ �. _ -..w rk � , �4y\.. 4.t p 1�L� es � _ �. �� "�,. �.. I . /�. y. . ' � ,.. 3 19- ' � i I ' 1 ( � �'o � ��j . �l a� ,� � �.�� '� .� _ _"". - E ,' . � � � �� y`'�� >.-. ' ` \ �B Y l ., � �� . �eL� muw. �si{ r � '� I I' ' � ✓ ., E � � � - � l �( S t C I °•I d� T` � i" ^[ L� i 1 as. �! i. � � „ !�}, i.i ...�\. � ,�i�� t_ kl_ J. � � y ,.'�-�� .';*r -�- S� ,k:?i , y '�— i� ..___ i.. �.,�d � � � -fr /1�^�� E ^' .� . � r r � '�� W I�.wa1 -'�-L �_ �� , ` � I - 1�• i ' � "�t �C,}•,�{� � �__'- �� 1 I � .J -_ il �I. � .. '�� )� _ t� ] _ _._r' r '� a Yv. r t _ i' -�. d � S .. �M` �rlL`Zst-�•i,oJ��E:� __ _ _ 'kP � a ..l .' ��' F : €� aF�'-' .. hc, ,�1 j�`,y �1�� _�;°� �=-� ;' �'��~ 4�� , �a � 1�i ! :�. J I ��.� �__ v I a A '- �� ... � (c�aa , �i �x .. 1 -�U -� . �(r . . � "� -N' u � j v� �� K� ' � � . i i � '- „ � �_ p °� � '� r � � �r �� y�� r_ �`'i I �s � � .. '' I �t T 3 MI . � �� i Y` � a !�` � .� T I L �y �� _ �.�. qi Y`� � i » i�. __ 1 ' � - -� -r'-;-i\ ----- \n �- ---- �t- .� � - - �'� �G1 I ' ..s' , " �� -i -II y-+,� - '31 [ �?'a - 4• � J � � � j p �� " 'r "o . `�. ' - 'i �� °i. ' � _, � � �Fd mFr" ;� % � i� •" , � ��,� 'i. , �^'�}, �' � � � , ��' a �; 1 �` ' AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT 408 ` , y � .� Is"' � fj .' �i�`�y jf�'. �'��'' r . . �i �� I/ � � � i �ri 'i7',.>: � �A ': i � •.w=�rrru., �� i'.:.:o.��.... � ! I ' 1 � .. {,aClfl ' F ti:�-c' a.�'��. _ 6a �. ;1_:3.__� y _i `�.. � ' • c �. �' � � _I `i ' O w�"r.` ea.�wW B sr�ud.. C � , / � � -' ' ' . 4 3 •rmwi. �.�i�.�e"' e�..`w r �� + � )l F' ,� ��.\. � �.- i I y..re.. e..�.r.rar r.+rra. � ' �`�� 8 �� Yg, d , � �� L"�4 . _ `� . '.�`..�vs y - �i}. .�i� _ _ _ '"',..6 _ _ al_" 5 +r,w� sn � .p S . � .S'�`'-�7 ' ,>S ` e. � s, 'f� �.. � �e� � � Yt . .wuerr�cstroor wvwav ,�I p�r�.. 00"�'u"" S s`v....4u. , , \� ., . I j w J� a rl, xn �...- yy t " 1ew t i ' �� rr+�rr �r.`�r rs w � ,. . � ` � � ry o��rv,s�c �� l .i-�-� . .�., � s✓i �. : h r� � , l a b f � -_ _.._ 'e �m:o w..� 1 q � I �f ��, � c,. '� _" _ _+' . � - _ ool S.u. wr ss v r ��.rr4r.i ; - _- _. 2 ;'�,�e., Y .I ` i'iL7 , ,� _\" � '" � 'C 9 - �`i � w u � , , ' „ ' � I � � m � . r ( . �� Y �` �-�t i.. .... /Rscmn)xw O�r.rr. 'r'°" 0 si.r.nr p M�=u.�.. Q 1 \\C :7 ' i 7 ,��_�� 4 �. �I , 4`� �.c �F ' � � �l�' �+� . \�i; ➢DS \��e 1 'r.'-'t �"_i � _ 'i.iTn� � I a 8 Ou::suW �!r'�e-"�r �wrrau.+n.. . , � _'.� rJi�`�t�11 1 �` ' � • � 1 f "1 i wr�w �.�}k,, � �� , �-.�� : I� ,j ' �t� � ,�t � � ' �� ! ' � � - � :,:: ��o� ��.r'�,�..... t E Y 6 E W�E QQ 9 • ' � °.��.- 7l,. ! � R�� _ � .�� r�� . � . O a M'u' S'�"'r"'r' A::.'�"..'eru ' . a�� I , '� j •� __ _�• � �,-y.�. .. _ � t�r� � . i � .' _ - - � 7�I w. � u�..a'o r«v i. f �+ � - a�- � � ��!'� �,)1 � �s' ' e�.�,. r ._-.r..' ` M_ 1- i p��;�rr 0..~.u�uaw � Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2ot4 through zOza INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (March 2014 Elementa Location 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Washington 1 2 3 3 3 3 3 Terminal Park 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 Dick Scobee 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 Pioneer 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 Chinook 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 Lea Hill 5 5 5 6 6 6 6 Gildo Rey 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 Evergreen Heights 1 2 3 3 4 4 4 Alpac 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 Lake View 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Hazelwood 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 Ilalko 4 5 6 6 6 6 6 Lakeland Hills Elementary 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 0 0 1 1 2 2 2 TOTAL UNITS 46 51 58 63 66 66 66 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,141 1,265 1,438 1,562 1,637 1,637 1,637 Middle School Location 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Cascade 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Olympic 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 Rainier 5 7 7 8 8 8 8 Mt. Baker 8 8 8 S 8 S 8 TOTAL UNITS 13 15 19 20 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 390 450 570 600 600 600 600 Sr. Hi h School Location 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 West Aubum 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn High School 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn High School-'TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 TOTAL UNITS 16 16 19 19 19 19 19 TOTAL CAPACITY 480 480 570 570 570 570 570 'TAP-Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 75 82 96 102 105 105 105 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,071 2,795 2,578 2,732 2,807 2,807 2,807 'Note: Reduction of portables at Aubum High School is due to the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project. 18 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Aubum School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the DistricYs educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The DistricYs capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V 1 and V.2 below. Table V 1 shows the DisticYs capacity with relocatable units included and Tabie V2 without these units. Table V 1 Capacity WITH relocatables 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 1/ A.2 SPI Capacity- New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 2,529 2,473 2,289 1,906 (1,752 1,677 1,677 C. Net Capacity 13,203 13,259 13,443 13,826 13,980 14,855 15,405 D. ASD Enrollment 14,791 15,391 15,788 16,252 16,814 17,248 17,702 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,588) (2,132) (2,345) (2,426) (2,834) (2,393) (2,297) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 1,955 2,011 2,195 2,578 2,732 2,807 2,807 2/ Exciude SOS 14 4,4&4 4,484 4,484 4,484 (4,484 4,484 4,484 Total Adjustments (2,529) (2,473) (2,289) (1,906) (1,752) (1,677) (1,677) Table V.2 Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 2013-14 2014-15 2D15-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,532 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 550 t/ A.2 SPI Capacity-New MS 800 B. Capacity Adjustments 4,484 4,484 4,484 4,4&4 4,484 4,484 4,484 C. NetCapacity 11,248 11,248 11,248 11,248 �1,248 12,048 12,598 D. ASD Enrollment 14,791 15,391 15,788 16,252 16,514 17,248 17,702 3/ E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,543) (4,143) (4,540) (5,004) (5,566) (5,200) (5,104) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/ Exclude SOS ( 14 4,484 4,484 4,484 4,484 4,484 4,4&4 4,484 Total Adjustments (4,484) (4,484) (4,484) (4,484) (4,484) (4,484) (4,484) 1/ New facilities shown in 2017-18 and 2018-19 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/ The Standard of Service represents 26.61%of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24.51%of SPI capacity 3/ Students beyond the capacity are accomodated in other spaces(commons, library,theater shared teaching space). 20 Aubum School DisVict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 PERMANENT FACILITIES PUPIL CAPACITY �SPI Rated Capacity (March 2014 A. Elementa Schools Buildin 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Washington 486 486 466 488 486 486 486 Tertninal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 , Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hilis 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 ArthurJacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementa #15 550 ELEM CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,888 B. Middle Schools Buildin 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Middle School#5 800 800 MS CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 4,230 4,230 C. Senior Hi h Schools Buildin 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 West Aubum 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 SH CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 75,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 76,532 17,062 21 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Aubum School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014through 2020 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines forDevelopment.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board corrimissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the DistricYs programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education /nfo The Twenty-First Century-- A Gommunity lnvolved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the OistricYs programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level suificient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the DistricYs teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998 the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998 the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition on the ballot four times prior to passing in 2003. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enroliment growth. This included the review of possible financing pians for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. 23 Auburn School District No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014through 2020 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the Fall of 2005. In the Fall of 2003 the school board directed the administratio�to begin the planning and design for Elementary#13 and Elementary#14 In the Fall of 2004, the Auburn School Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64 72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary(Elementary #13) opened in the Fail of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary#14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the Fall of 2007 These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hilis and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen's Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley On May 17, 2006 the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Aubum and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006 the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006 the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recomme.ndations to the school board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the school board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The boarcJ decided to place only a six-year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy will fund $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the next seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schoots has sta�ted with educational specifications and schematic design process beginning in 2010 for Aubum High School. A future bond issue will be necessary to fund these projects. The school district acquired a site for a future middle school in 2009 and will need to consider possibilities for a site for elementary school#15. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. The groundbreaking occurred in February 2013 and construction began. This phased project is scheduled to be completed within the next three years. Phase I is nearing completion. Approximately 60% of the total new building area will be occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2014 za Auburn School Distrid No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN zota u,roueh 2020 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PIAN Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 2,172 additional students mostly from new development in the Lakeland, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas. This increase in student population will require the construction of a new middle school and acquiring a new elementary school site and constructing an elementary school during the six-year window Based upon the DistricYs capacity data and enrollment projections, as well as the student generation data included in Appendix A:3, the District has determined that approximately eighty-six percent of the capacity improvements are necessary to serve the students generated from new development, with the remaining additional capacity required to address existing need. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues and/or capital improvement levies. 2014-20 Capital Construction Plan March 2014 Projected Fund Project Timelines Pro'ect Funded Cost Source 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 All Facilities- 2013 Technology Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX XX XX )p( Modernization Cap Levy Pohables Yes $2,100,000 Impact � � � XX XX XX 11 Fees �� Property Purchase Impaa New Elementa No $3,500,000 Fees XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility yes $46,400,000 Capital � � � � Im rovements Levy Bond XX XX XX 1/ Middle School#5 No $52,800,000 Impacc Fee plan const open Bond )()( )()( )p( 1/ Elementary#15 No $29,800,000 Impad Fee lan const open AHS Modernization Yes $110,000,000 Bond Issue � � � const const o en il These funds may be secured through local bond issues,sale of real property, impact fees,and state matching funds. The District currently is not eligible for state assistance at the elementary school level for new construction. The tlistrict is eligible for state matching funds for modernization. 25 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn Scho .rict No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through 2020 IMPACT FEE COMPUTAT/ON(SpNng 2014) Middie School#5 within 5 year period Elementary#15 within 5 year period L SITE COST PER RES/DENCE Fortnula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facildy Size)x Student Fador SRe Costl Facildy Student Generation Fador CosU CosU Acreage Acre Capaciry Single Famity Mutti Family Single Famiy Mulli Famiy Elem(K-5) 12 $356,728 550 0.1&50 02230 $1,28422 $1,735.64 Middle Sch(6-8) 25 $0 800 0.0760 0.0910 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High(9 12) 40 $0 1500 0.0890 0:0920 $0.00 $0.00 51.284.22 $1,735.84 II. PERMANENT FAC/L/TY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RES/DENCE Formula: ((Facility CosVFacilily Size)x Student Fador)x(Pertnanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility °/a Perm Sq FU Student Generation Factor CosU Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Sin le Famiy Multi Famil Single Famity Multi Famity Elem (K-5) $29,800,000 550 0.9626 0.1650 02230 $8,605.49 $11,630.45 Mid Sch(6 8) $52,800,000 800 0.9626 0.0760 0.0910 $4,828.31 $5,78127 Sr High(9-12) $0 1500 0.9626 0.0890 0.0920 $0.00 $0.00 $13,433.80 517,411J2 lll. TEMPORARYFACILITYCONSTRUCT/ONCOSTPERRESIDENCE Fortnula: ((Facility CosUFaciliy Size)x Student Factor)x(Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Faciliry %Temp Sq FV StudentGeneration Factor CosU CosV Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Sin le Famil Multi Family Single Famil Multi Famil Elem(K-5) $150,000 24.8 00374 0.1650 0.2230 $37.34 $50.47 Mid Sch(6-8) $150,000 30 0.0374 0.0760 0.0910 $1422 $17.02 Sr High(9 12) $150,000 30 0.0374 0.0890 0.0920 $16.65 $17.21 568.20 884.70 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE FormuW: (Boeckh index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Fador) 8oeckh SPI State Stutlent Generation Fador CosU CosU Indrac FooW e Match Sin le Family Muki Famiy Single Famiy Mutti Famiy Elem�(K-5) $200.40 90 62.31°/, 0.1650 02230 $1,854.31 $2,50613 MidSch(6-8) $200.40 117 62.31% 0.0760 0.0910 $7,110:34 $1,329.48 Sr High(9-12) $0.00 130 62.31% 0.0890 0.0920 $0.00 $0.00 S2,9W.85 $3,835.82 27 Aubum Sch�_.��strid No 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2074 through 2020 V. T/!X CREDIT PER RESIDENCE formula: Expressed as lhe present value of an annudy TC=PV(interest rete,discount period,average assd value x tau rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tau Credd Tax Credit Asstl Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Famity MuRi Family SingleFamily $210,210 $2.12 438% t0 53,54716 Mutti Famiy $78,449 $2.12 4.38% 10 $1,323.78 Vl. PEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITYCREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or FacilityMumber ot dwelling unRs) Value No.of Unks Facildy Credd Single Famiry $0.00 1 50.00 Mulli Family $0.00 1 50.00 fEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multi SUMMARY Famiy Famiy Sile Costs $1,28422 $1,735.64 PertnanentFacilityConstCosts $13,433.80 $�74�172 Temparary Faciliry Costs $6820 $84.70 State Match Credd ($2,964.65) ($3,835.62) Tax Cred'R ($3,547 16) ($1,323.78) FEE(No Discount) $8,274.42 $14,072.67 FEE(50°/,Discount) $4,137.21 $7,036.34 Less ASD 50%Discount $0.00 ($3,5�8 17) Faciliry CredN $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Oblfgation $4,1J7.21 53,518.17 28 Aubum Scho. .rict No.408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2014 through�2020 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE�ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K-5 6-8 9-12 K 5• 8-8' 9-12' Student Factor Single Famiy-Aubum actual count(3/14) 0.165 0.076 0 089 0223 0.09f 0.092 New Fac Capaciry 550 800 1500 550 800 1500 New Facility Cast Elementary Cast Estimates April 2014 $26,000,000 $50,700,000 $26,000,000 $50,700,000 Middle Schaol Cost Estimate April 2014 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 24.8 30� 30 24.8 30 30 GradesK-5@24.Band6-12@30. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables,inGuding site work,set up,and fumishing $150,000 E150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Site Acreage ASD Distrid Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site CasVAcre Sce below $356,728 $356,728 $356,728 $358,728 $356,728 $356,728 Perm Sq Footage SPI Rpt#3 dated December 14,2011 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 Temp Sq Footage 75 poAables at 832/896 sq.ft.each+TAP 3500 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,900 65,90Q Tolal Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,761,217 1,761,217 1,761,217 1,761,217 1,761,217 1,761,217 % Perm Facilkies Pertnanent Sq.Footage divided by Total Sq.Footage 9626°/a 9626% 96.26°h 96.26% 96.26% 96.26% °�-Temp Facilities Temporary Sq.Footage divWed by Total Sq.Footage 3.74% 3.74% 3.74°/, 3.74% 3.74% 3.74% SPI Sq FllStudenl From SPI Regulations 90 117 130 90 117 130 Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for December 2012 $200.40 $200.40 $200.40 $200.40 $200.40 $200.40 MatCh%-Stale FfomSPlWebpagBDecambef2012 62.31% 62.31% 62.31% 62.31% 62.31% 62.31% MatCh% DiS�fICt CompUted 37.69°/a 37.69% 37.69% 37.69% 37.69% 37.69% Dist Aver AV King County Department ot Assessments March 2014 $210,210 $210,210 $210,210 $78,449 $78,449 $78,449 Debt Serv Tax Rate Curtent Fiscal Year $2.12 $2.12 $2.12 $2.12 $2.12 $2.12 G.O Bond Int Rale Current Rate-(Bond Buyer 20lridex March 2014) 4.38% 4.38% 4.38'Yo 4.38% 4.38°h 4.38°h Sit6 COS�Pf0 BCtfOI1S •student generation rares zatz tor mWtl-tami�y Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted �Projected Annual Sttes Latesl Date Projeded Acquisitions Acreage Year Price CosUAcre Present Day Inflation Fador Re uired ot Acquisition CosUAcre Lakeland 12.00 2002 $2,701,043 5225,087 $310,687 Labredor 35.00 2008 $7,601,799 E217194 $223,710 Lakeland East 27:00 2009 $9;092,160 5336,747 $336,747 Tofal 74.00 $19,395,002 $282,095 $290,381 5.00°/a Elementary 2017 $356,728 29 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2013 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition,the `projector' must make certain assumptions about the operant vaziables within the data being used. These assumptions are"judgmental"by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future,or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological,economiq and political factors that aze present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual'factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively The results provide a trend,which reflects a long(13-year)and a short (6-year)base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-yeaz time frame and adds it to each succeeding year The second derives what the average percentage Aubum kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four yeazs. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1—Thirteen Year Hisiorv of October 1 Enrollments—page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2—Historical Factors Used rn Proiections- page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1 These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are: • Factor 1—Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the"holding power"or"cohort survival:' It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. e Factor 2 -Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-yeaz period. o Factor 3—Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Fuuction of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 1 Table 3—Proiection Models—pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned vaziables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below ❑ Table 3 13 (pg 5)—shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2)and the 13-year average change between grade levels(Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole. ❑ Table 3.6(pg 5)—shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3 13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 yeazs. ❑ Table 3.13A aqd 3.6A(pg 6)—uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates aze derived from the King Counry live births instead of the average gain. ❑ Tables 3E.13,3E.6,3E.13A, 3E.6A(pg 7)—breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3MS.13,3MS.6, 3MS.13A,3MS.6A(pg 8)—breaks out the 6-8 gades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A,3SH.6A(pg 9)—breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation. ❑ Table 4(pg 10)—Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of compazison. ❑ Table S (pgs 11-13)—shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 yeazs. Summarv This year is the second consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment.The increase of 375 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 yeazs the average gain is now 48%annually,which equates to an average annual gain of 69 students. Using the cohort survival models,the data below is a summary of the range of vaziation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 342 to 1328. (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 489 to 538. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 353 to 410.(page 9) The models show these changes looking forwazd thirteen years: • Elementary level show increases ranging from 2341 to 2773 (page 7) • Middle School level show increases ranging from 442 to 1248. (page 8) • High School level show increases ranging from 795 to 1401 (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. 2 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ' OLLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enroliments(Rev 10/13) 1 Actual GRADE 01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-OS OB-09 09-10 "10-11 it-12 12-13 13-14 KDG 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 7029 '1098 1170 1 968 900 982 960 � 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 7068 1089 1188 2 949 961 909 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 3 966 940 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 '1111 1125 4 1077 973 ' 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 5 1108 1062 1018 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 6 , 1028 1704 1111 1020 � 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1047 1063 1041 1076 7 '1017 1021 1731 '1124 1028 1074 . 1057 1034 1125 '1060 '1032 1086 1072 8 1004 1026 , 1052 �130 1137 �072 �033 1W6 1031 1112 '1046 1017 1116 9 1405 1441 1473 '1461 1379 1372 '1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 10 1073 1234 1249 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 11 1090 927 1010 1055 1782 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 '1164 1240 12 � 930 933 902 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 '1321 �274 TOTALS �3,461 13,427 13,702 13,672 14,088 14,418 '14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 Percent of Gain (025)% 2.05% (022)% 3.04% 2.34% 0 98% 0.99% (078)% (073)% (0.82)% 1 62% 2.57% Pupil Gain (34) 275 (30) 4�6 330 141 144 i114� (�07� f�19) 233 375 Average°/a Gain for 1st 6 years 1.32% Average%Gain for lasf 6 years 0.48% Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 183 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 69 Average°/ Gain for 13 years 0.90% Average Pupil Gain for 73 years �26 TABLE tA GradeGroupCombinaLons KDG 846 905 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 K,'1,2 2763 2766 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 K-5 5914 5741 5774 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 K-6 6942 6845 6885 6755 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7681 1 -3 2883 2801 2887 2870 2928 3045 30'11 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 �� 3437 1 -5 5068 4836 4852 4843 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 1 -6 6096 5940 5963 5863 5936 6150 6753 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 67N 6-8 3049 3'151 3294 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3796 3213 3141 3144 3264 7-8 2021 2047 2183 2254 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 7-9 3426 3488 3656 3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 9-12 4498 4535 4634 4663 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 506'I 4992 4963 4902 10-12 3093 3094 3161 3202 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 prj'13-14 Page 3 Oclober 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT f�LLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2013 TABLE Factors Used in Projeciions Factor AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS 2 3 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATES CAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTEN Factor Average Pupil Change Between Grade ENDAR LIVE 2l3rds 1l3rds OF LNE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A%OF 1 Levels YEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS 13 YEAR BASE i 6 YEAR BASE 1973 13,449 8,966 4,483 79/80 13 478 618 4 585% K to t I 53.92 K l0 1 49.33 1974 13 493 8 995 4 498 80/81 13,524 600 4.436% 1 ta2 'I 11A2 � to2 12.67 1975 73,540 9,027 4,513 8�/82 13,687 588 4296% 2 ta 3 13.08 2 to 3 8.17 1976 13 761 9'174 4,587 82/83 14,375 698 4.856% 3 to 4 24.50 3 to 4 27.67 1977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 666 4.452°/ 4 ta 5 21.67 4 to 5 13.83 1978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 726 4 524% 5 ta 6 9.08 5 to 6 2 17 1979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16 708 792 4 740% 6 to 7 1425 6 to 7 20.17 1980 16,800 11 200 5,600 86I87 17,000 829 4.876°/ 7to8 9.92 7108 0.67 1981 17;100 11,400 5,700 87l88 18;241 769 4216% 8 to 9 256.67 8 to 9 I 173.00 1982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 16,626 817 4.386% 9 to 10 i 52.83) 9 to 10 ' 0.33 1983 18,533 �2,355 6;178 89l90 18 827 871 4 626°/ 101011 t73.G0) �Oto�1 � �20�7) 1984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90191 19,510 858 4.398°/ 11 to 12 i0.83) 1�to�2 � 59.50 1985 19,778 '13,785 6,593 9'1192 19,893 909 4.569% total 287.83 total 346.83 �986 19,951 '13,301 6,650 92193 21,852 920 4210°/ Faclor � is the average gain or loss of pupils as Ihey 1987 22,803 '15,202 7,601 93194 21 624 930 4 301°/ move from one grade level to the nexl. Factor 1 uses �988 21 034 14 023 7,011 I 94195 24,062 927 3.853% the past(12)OR(5)years of changes �989 25,576 17,051 8,525 i 95196 26,358 954 3.619% 1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 � 96/97 24,'116 963 3.993°/ Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level 1991 22,799 '15,199 7,600 97/98 20 973 978 4,663% 2 1992 2Q060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 854 3.959% 13 YEAR BASE fi YEAR BASE 1993 22,330 14;887 7,443 99100 22,129 849 3.837°/ K 27.00 K 34.40 1994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 912 3 798% 1 18.33 1 34.60 1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 07/02 22,717 846 3724% 2 14.58 2 20.00 1996 2�,573 14382 7,991 02/03 27,622 905 4'186% 3 1325 3 i 15.40 1997 21,646 14,431 7,275 03/04 22,023 922 4 786% 4 3.83 4 � 15.80 1998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 892 4.041% 5 i275) 5 �' 120 1999 22,007 14,671 7,336 OSI06 22,327 955 4277% 6 4.00 6 ;4.00) 2000 22,487 14,99� 7 496 Ofi107 22 014 947 4 274°/ 7 4.58 7 7.60 2001 21 778 14 519 7 259 07I08 21 835 996 4.562% 8 9.33 8 8.00 2002 21863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 998 4.487% 9 120.50) 9 ' (19407 2003 22431 14,954 7,477 09I10 22,726 1032 4.541% Last5 10 13.00 70 I (22.40) 2004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 1010 4.441% year 17 12.50 11 i (22D0) 2005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11112 23,723 1029 4.338% Average 12 28.67 12 I (15.50) 2006 24,244 16,163 8081 12/13 24683 1098 4.448% 4.480°/a Faclor 2 is the averaqe change in grade level size 2007 24,902 16 601 8,301 13114 25,094 1162 Actual 4.631% from 01/02 OR OS/09 2008 25,'190 16,793 6,397 14I15 25,101 1124 <--Pr�ctd Last 5 2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 15/16 24,695 1106 <-Pr�ctd l.ast5 2010 24,574 16,343 8,171 161�7 24,591 1f02 <--Prjctd Last5 2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 77/�8 24,898 1N5 <--Prjctd Last5 2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 �8/19 *number from DOH Source Center for Health Statistics,Washington State Department of Health prj13-14 Page 4 Oclober 20�3 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F '7LLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2013 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3 13 BaSed on 73 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 74115 15/16 16/17 17/18 78119 '19I20 20f21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 KDG 1170 1197 1224 1251 1278 7305 1332 1359 1386 1413 7440 �467 1494 1521 1 1188 1224 1251 1278 1305 7332 1359 1386 1413 1440 1467 1494 1521 '1548 2 1124 1199 1235 1262 1289 1376 1343 1370 1397 1424 1451 7478 1505 �532 3 1125 1137 12'13 1248 1275 1302 1329 1356 1383 1410 1437 1464 1491 '1518 4 1123 1150 1162 1237 1273 130D 1327 1354 1381 1408 1435 1462 1489 1516 5 1075 1145 1171 1183 1259 1295 1322 1349 7376 1403 1430 1457 1484 15'I1 6 1076 1084 1154 1180 1192 1268 1304 1331 1358 1385 1412 1439 1466 "1493 7 1072 1090 1098 1168 1195 1207 1282 1318 1345 1372 1399 1426 1453 '1480 8 1116 1082 1100 1108 1178 1204 12'17 1292 1328 1355 1382 1409 1436 '1463 9 1759 1373 1339 1357 1365 1435 146t 1473 1549 1585 1612 1639 1666 "1693 10 1229 1106 1320 7286 1304 1312 1382 1408 1420 1496 1532 1559 1586 1613 11 1240 7156 1033 1247 1213 1231 7239 1309 1335 1347 1423 1459 1486 1513 12 1274 1239 1755 1032 1246 7212 7230 1238 1306 '1334 1347 1422 1458 1485 TOTALS 14,971 15,182 75,455 15,838 16.372 16,719 17,126 17.543 '17,9�9 18,372 18,765 19173 19,533 19,884 Percent of Gain 1 41°/ 7.80°/ 2.48°/ 3.37°/ 2 12% 2 44°/ 2.43% 2.48% 2 19% 2 14% 2 18% � 88% 1 80% Pupii Gain 211 273 384 533 347 408 417 436 393 393 408 360 351 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13l14 14/15 15I16 16/17 17/18 18l19 �920 20/21 2�/22 22l23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 KDG 1170 1204 1239 1273 1308 1342 1376 1411 "1445 1480 1574 7548 1583 �617 1 1188 1219 1254 1288 1323 1357 1391 1426 1460 1495 1529 1563 1598 �632 2 1124 1201 1232 1266 1301 1335 1370 1404 1438 1473 1507 1542 7576 '1610 3 1125 1132 1209 1240 1275 1309 1343 1378 1412 1447 1481 1515 1550 1584 4 1123 1153 1160 1237 1268 1302 1337 1371 1405 1440 1474 1509 1543 '1577 5 1075 1137 1167 1174 1250 1282 1316 1350 1385 1419 1454 1488 1522 1557 6 1076 1077 1139 1169 1176 1253 1284 1318 1353 1387 1421 1456 1490 1525 7 1072 1096 7097 1159 1189 1196 1273 1304 1338 1373 1407 1442 1476 1510 8 7116 1073 7097 1098 1160 1190 1197 1273 1305 1339 1373 1408 1442 1477 9 7159 1289 7246 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 1446 1478 1512 1546 158t 1615 10 1229 1159 1289 1246 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 7447 1478 1512 1547 1581 11 1240 1208 1139 1269 1225 1250 1251 1313 1342 1349 1426 1457 1492 1526 12 1274 1300 1268 1198 1328 1265 1309 1310 1372 1402 1409 1486 1517 1551 TOTALS 14,971 15,248 15,534 '15,887 16,343 16,704 17,142 17,591 18.072 18,527 18,986 19,472 19,917 20,364 PercentofGain 185% 1,88% 227% 2.87% 221% 2.62% 2.62% 274% 2.51% 2.48% 2.56% 228% 225% Pupil Gain 277 286 352 456 361 438 449 482 454 459 486 444 447 prj13-14 Page 5 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2013 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3 13A Based on Birth Rates&13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/74 14/15 15/16 16/17 17I18 18119 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 K �170 1724 1106 1�02 1115 1 1188 7224 1�78 1160 1156 N69 2 1124 1199 1235 1190 1172 1167 1181 3 1125 1137 1213 1248 1203 1185 'I180 1194 4 1123 1150 1162 1237 1273 1227 1209 1205 1218 5 1075 1145 1171 1183 1259 1295 1249 1231 1226 1240 6 �076 1084 1154 1'I80 1192 7268 1304 1258 1240 1235 �249 7 1072 'I090 1098 1�68 1195 12W 1282 1318 1272 1254 1250 1263 S 1116 '1082 1100 1108 1178 1204 1217 7292 1328 '1282 1264 '1259 1273 9 1159 1373 1339 1357 7365 1435 1461 1473 1549 '1585 1539 �521 1516 1530 10 1229 1106 1320 1286 1304 1312 �382 1408 1420 1496 1532 1486 1468 1463 �1 1240 1156 1033 1247 1213 1231 1239 1309 1335 1347 1423 1459 14�3 1395 12 1274 1239 1155 1032 1246 '12'12 1230 1238 1308 1334 1347 1422 '1458 1412 TOTALS 14,971 15,109 15,264 15,498 '15,869 PercentofGain 0-92% 103% 153% 2.39°/ Pupil Gain 138 155 234 371 TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS 3.6A Based on Birth Rates 8 6 Year History ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 �7118 18(19 19/20 20/21 21122 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 KDG 1170 1'124 1106 1102 1115 7 1'188 1219 1174 1156 1151 1165 2 1724 1201 1232 1186 1168 1164 1177 3 1125 �132 1209 1240 1195 1176 1172 1186 4 1123 1153 1160 1237 '1268 1222 1204 1199 1213 5 1075 1137 1167 1"174 1250 1282 �236 1218 1213 1227 6 1076 1077 1139 1169 1176 1253 1264 1238 1220 1215 1229 7 1072 1096 1097 1159 1189 1196 '1273 1304 1258 1240 1236 1249 8 1116 1073 1097 1098 1160 1190 1197 1273 1305 1259 7241 1236 1250 9 1159 1289 1246 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 1446 1478 1432 1414 1409 1423 10 1229 1159 1289 1246 1270 127� 1333 1363 '1370 '1447 1478 1432 1414 1410 11 1240 1208 '1139 1269 1225 1250 1251 7313 1342 1349 1426 '1457 1412 1394 12 1274 1300 1268 1198 1328 1285 1309 1310 1372 1402 1409 '1486 1517 1471 TOTALS 14.971 15,168 15,322 15,502 15,766 PercentofGain '132°/ 101°/ 118% 1.70°/ Pupd Gam 197 154 181 264 prj73-14 Page 6 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2013 3E 13 Based on 13 Year History J J PR J J J J GRADE 13/14 14115 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/79 79120 20/21 2122 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 K 777 4 5 7 1 5 1 1359 138 141 144 14 7 1494 15 1 7188 1224 1251 1278 1305 1332 1359 1386 1413 1440 7467 1494 1521 1548 2 7124 1199 1235 1262 1289 1316 1343 1370 1397 1424 1451 1478 1505 1532 3 1125 1137 1213 1248 1275 1302 '1329 1356 1383 1410 7437 1464 1497 1518 4 1113 11SU 111i2 113! 1L/3 13UU '13Z/ 1354 1381 140C t4Sb 141iL 1489 1J7ti 5 1075 1145 1171 1183 1259 1295 '1322 1349 1376 1403 1430 1457 1484 7571 year year K-5 TOT 6805 7052 7256 7460 7679 7850 8012 8174 8336 8498 8660 8822 8984 9146 7207 2341 E�cent 0 ain . 2 0 2. 9 0 2.8 0 . 4 o . o . 2 0 1 0 1 4 0 0 0 l 4 0 1 Pupil Gam 247 204 204 219 171 162 � 162 162 162 762 162 162 162 a TABLE -5 J 3E 6 Based on 6 Year History A J GRADE 13/�4 14115 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 7 2 4 3 127 7 4 445 14 5 1 17 1 1�88 1219 1254 1288 1323 1357 1391 1426 1460 7495 1529 1563 1598 1632 2 1124 1201 1232 1266 7301 1335 1370 7404 1438 7473 1507 7542 1576 1610 3 1125 1132 1209 1240 1275 1309 1343 1378 1412 1447 1481 1575 1550 1584 4 111J 7153 1�60 1237 11ti8 1JUY 13J7 73/7 1405 144U 14/4 1509 154:i 15I7 5 1075 1137 1767 1774 1250 1282 1316 1350 1385 1419 1454 1488 7522 1557 year year K-5 TOT 6805 7046 7260 7478 7724 7927 8133 8340 8546 8753 8959 9165 9372 9578 1328 2773 ercent o ain . o . o . o . . . 0 54 0 2 47 0 . . . 5 0 . Pupil Gain 247 274 218 246 � 203� 206 206 206 206 � 206� 206 0 206 206 � TABLE -5 J TI N 3E 13A Basetl on Bidh Rates 8 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13114 14l15 15116 16/17 17118 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 7 4 1 1 111 1 1188 1224 1178 1160 1156 1169 2 1124 1199 1235 1190 1172 1167 1181 3 1125 1137 1213 1248 1203 1185 1180 1194 4 1113 11b0 1162 11'S/ 11/J "111/ 1LU9 11US iL1tl 5 1075 1145 1171 1183 1259 1295 1249 1231 1226 1240 year K-5 TOT 6805 6979 7065 7120 7'177 372 ercent o ain .5 0 1. 7 0 . o Pupil Gain 174 86 � 55 57 TABLE -5 P JE TI N 3E 6A Basetl on Birth Rates 8 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PR J PROJ PR J PROJ PROJ PR J PR J PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 1920 20/21 21l22 2Z23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 17 4 11 1'I 2 'i"I 5 1 1188 1219 1174 1156 1�51 1165 2 1124 1201 1232 1186 7168 1164 1177 3 1125 1132 1209 1240 1195 1176 1172 1186 4 11YJ 1"15J 7160 1237 7268 1Y22 'IY04 1189 1213 5 1075 1137 7767 1�74 1250 1282 1236 1218 1273 1227 year K-5 TOT 6805 6966 7047 7094 7147 342 ercent o ain - o . 6 0 75 0 Pupil Gain 161 81 � 47 53 prj13-14 Page 7 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F �LLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2013 TABLE MIDDLESCHOOLPROJECTIONS 3MS 13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/'15 15/16 16/77 17/18 18/19 19I20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6 1076 '1084 1154 1180 1�92 1268 1304 1331 1358 1385 1412 1439 1466 1493 7 1072 1090 1098 1168 1195 1207 1282 1318 1345 1372 1399 1426 1453 1480 8 1116 1082 1100 1108 1178 1204 1217 7292 1328 1355 7382 1409 1436 1463 6 year 13year 6-8 TOT 3264 3256 3352 3457 3565 3679 3802 3941 4030 41'11 4�92 4273 4354 4435 538 1171 POtCentOfG2in j024�','. 2.95% 311% 313% 320% 3.35% 3.64% 228% 201% 197% 193% 190% 186% Pupil Gain i8� 96 104 108 114 123 138 90 81 81 81 81 81 TABLE MIDDIE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS 6 Based on 6 Year Hislory ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/�4 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18l19 19/20 20/21 21l22 22123 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6 1076 7077 1139 1169 1176 1253 1284 '1318 7353 1387 1421 1456 1490 1525 7 1072 '1096 1097 1159 1189 1196 1273 1304 1338 1373 1407 1442 1476 1510 8 1116 1073 1097 1098 1160 1190 1197 1273 1305 1339 �373 1408 1442 1477 6 year '13year 6-8 TOT 3264 3246 3333 3426 3525 3638 3753 3896 3996 4099 4202 4305 4409 4512 489 1248 Percent of Gain i 0.55)'>5 2.69%a 2 78% 2.88% 322% 3 17%o 3 79% 2.57% 2.58% 2.52% 2.46% 2.40% 2.34% Pupil Gain (�8) 87 93 99 114 115 142 100 �03 103 103 103 103 TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS'13A Based on Birth Rates&13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 '14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21122 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26 27 6 1076 1084 1154 ��80 1192 1268 1304 1258 1240 1235 1249 7 1072 1090 1098 1�68 1195 1207 1282 1318 7272 1254 1250 1263 8 1116 1082 7100 7108 1178 1204 1217 '1292 1328 1282 1264 1259 1273 6 year 10year 6-8 TOT 3264 3256 3352 3457 3565 3679 3802 3868 3840 3772 3763 538 499 PercentofGain (02=)�i 295% 311% 313% 320% 3.35% 173% (072)/0 (1 '8)% (024�`/� Pupll Gain .d1 96 104 108 '1�4 123 66 (23) (u8) (9) TABLE MIDDLESCHOOLPROJECTIONS 3MS 6A Based on Birth Rates&6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18l19 19/20 20121 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6 1076 1077 1139 1169 1176 1253 1284 1238 1220 '1215 1229 7 1072 1096 1097 1159 N89 1196 1273 1304 1258 1240 1236 1249 8 N 16 1073 1097 1098 7�60 1190 �797 1273 1305 7259 1241 1236 1250 6year 10year 6-8 TOT 3264 3246 3333 342fi 3525 3638 3753 3816 3783 3715 3706 489 442 PercentofGain (055)% 2.69°/ 278% 2$S% 322% 317% 166% (0.65)°5 (18�p% (025)% Pupil Gain (181 87 93 99 114 115 62 (32) fEBj (6) prj13-14 Page 8 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F �LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE SR HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH 13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAI PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19I20 20121 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 9 1159 1373 1339 1357 1365 1435 1461 1473 1549 1585 1612 1639 1666 1693 10 1229 1106 1320 1286 1304 1312 1382 1408 1420 1496 1532 1559 1586 1613 11 1240 1156 1033 1247 1213 1231 1239 1309 1335 1347 1423 �459 1486 1513 12 1274 1239 1155 1032 1246 1272 1230 1238 1308 1334 1347 1422 1458 1485 6 year 13year 9-12 TOT 4902 4874 4847 4922 5128 5190 5312 5428 5612 5762 5912 6078 6195 6303 410 1401 PercentofGain �G ��-':rt; f0',�:��;', 155°/ 4l8°/ 121% 236% 219°/ 3.38°/ 2.67°/ 2.61°/ 2.80°/ 192% 774°/ Pupil Gain :231 :2%i 75 206 62 123 116 184 150 150 165 117 108 TABLE SR HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH 6 8ased on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21122 2Z23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 9 1159 1289 124fi 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 1446 1478 1512 1546 1581 1615 10 1229 1159 1289 1246 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 1447 1478 1512 1547 1581 11 �240 1208 1139 1269 1225 1250 1251 1313 1342 1349 1426 1457 1492 1526 12 1274 1300 1268 1198 1328 1285 1309 1310 �372 1402 1409 1486 1517 1551 6 year 13year 9-12 TOT 4902 4956 4942 4983 5095 5139 5255 5355 5531 5675 5825 6002 6136 6274 353 1372 Percent of Gain 1 10°/ i 0.30i'>; 0.83°/ 225°/ 0.86°/ 227% 1.90% 327% 2.62°/ 2.64% 3.04% 224% 224% Pupil Gain 54 �15i 41 112 44 117 100 175 '145 150 177 135 138 TABLE SR HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH 13A Based on Birth Rates& 13 Year Hisiory ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 2�122 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 9 1159 1373 '1339 1357 1365 1435 1461 1473 1549 1585 1539 152� 1516 7530 �0 1229 1106 1320 1286 1304 1312 1382 1408 1420 1496 1532 1486 1468 1463 �1 1240 1156 1033 1247 12'13 1231 1239 1309 1335 1347 1423 1459 1413 1395 '12 1274 1239 1155 1032 1246 1212 1230 1238 1308 1334 1347 1422 1458 1412 6 year ' 13year 9-12 TOT 4902 4874 4847 4922 5'128 5190 5312 5428 56�2 5762 5840 5887 5855 5800 410 898 PercentofGain (0.5T�'� l0561°,5 155% 418% 121% 2.36% 219% 3.38% 2.67% 135% 0.81% (OSS% (Oy3)4a Pupil Gain !?31 12;) 75 206 62 123 116 184 150 78 48 i32i 155� TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates&6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/79 19/20 20121 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 9 1159 1289 1246 1270 1271 1333 1363 1370 1446 1478 1432 1414 '1409 1423 10 1229 �159 1289 1246 1270 127'I 1333 1363 7370 1447 1478 1432 14�4 1410 11 1240 1208 1"139 1269 '1225 1250 7251 1313 7342 1349 1426 1457 "14"12 1394 12 1274 1300 1268 1198 1328 1285 1309 1310 1372 1402 1409 1486 15'17 �471 6year 13year 9-12 TOT 4902 4956 4942 4983 5095 5139 5255 5355 5531 5675 5745 5789 5752 5697 353 795 PercentofGain 110% (G.30)i6 0.83% 225% 0.86°/ 227°/ 190% 327°/ 2.62% 123% 077% 10.64i'�6 f,055�'G Pupil Gain 54 (15) 47 112 4A 1'17 100 175 '145 70 A4 137) i55) prj13-14 Page 9 October 20�3 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT � 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 4 BY GRADE GROUP KINDERGARTEN ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE �3/14 14I15 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/2'I 2V22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6year 13year E 13 1170 1197 1224 1251 1278 1305 1332 1359 1386 1413 1440 1467 1494 1521 162 351 E 6 1170 1204 1239 1273 1308 1342 1376 1411 1445 �480 1514 1548 1583 1617 206 447 E 13A 1170 '1124 1106 1102 1115 E.6A 1170 1124 1106 1102 1115 GRD'I --GRD5 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 74/15 15/16 16/17 17l18 18l19 19I20 20121 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6year I 13year E 13 5635 5855 6032 6209 6401 6545 6680 68'15 6950 7085 7220 7355 7490 7625 1045 � 1990 E.6 5635 5842 6021 6205 6416 6585 6757 6929 710'I 7273 7445 7617 7789 796'I 1122 i 2326 E 13A 5635 5855 5959 6019 6062 E.6A 5635 5842 5941 5992 6032 GRD6--GRDS ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16l17 17/18 18I19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23 24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6 year 13 year MS 13 3264 3256 3352 3457 3565 3679 3802 3941 4D30 4111 4192 4273 4354 4435 538 1171 MS.6 3264 3246 3333 3426 3525 3638 3753 3896 3996 4099 4202 4305 4409 4512 489 1248 MS 13A 3264 3256 3352 3457 3565 3679 3802 3868 3840 3772 3763 MS.6A 3264 3246 3333 3426 3525 3638 3753 3816 3783 37�5 3706 GRD 9--GRD 12 ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14/15 15/16 16117 17/18 18/19 79I20 20121 21122 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 6 year 13 year SH 13 4902 4874 4847 4922 5128 5190 5312 5428 5612 5762 59�2 6078 6195 6303 410 1401 SH.6 4902 4956 4942 4983 5095 5139 5255 5355 5531 5675 5825 6002 6136 6274 353 I 1372 SH 13A 4902 4874 4847 4922 5128 5190 5312 5428 5612 5762 5840 5887 5855 5800 41D 898 SH.6A 4902 4956 4942 4983 5095 5139 5255 5355 5531 5675 5745 5789 5752 5697 353 j 795 DISTRICT TOTALS ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ GRADE 13/14 14l15 15/16 16117 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 2425 25-26 26-27 6year 13year 313 14,977 15,182 75,455 15,838 16,372 16,719 17,126 17543 17,979 �8,372 '18765 19,173 19,533 19,884 2155 4913 3.6 14,971 15,248 15,534 15,887 16,343 16,704 17,142 17,591 18,072 18,527 '18 986 19,472 19 917 20,364 2171 5393 3.13A 14,971 15,109 15,264 15,498 15,869 3.6A 14 971 15,168 15;322 15,502 15,766 pr�13-14 Page 10 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT f 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Prqected Counts Pr�3 13- 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Projection is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Prqection is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3 13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty BiAh Rates Prj 3.6A- 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-OS 2005-06 K-5 Total Diff % Total Diff °/ Total Diff % Total Diff % Total D�ff °/ ACTUAL 5914 �ooc �oa 574� ra� z� 5774 ba �roc 5735 boc x�oc 5887 x�a poc Pr�3E 13 5827 f871 ll 47j% 5723 (18) (0.31)% 5655 (li9) (2 GG)% 5761 26 0.45% 5750 (137) (2.33]°'� Prj3E,6 5802 (112) 1.189�?:, 5735 (6) (010)% 5662 (li2) (19aj% 5821 86 150°/ 5795 (92) (l56)96 Prj3E'13A 5839 t75) (127�% 5743 2 0.03% 5605 (159j (293)% 5709 l��) 1a�45)'% 5750 ('137� (2.33)% P�j3E.6A 5831 (83) (1.40)% 5776 35 0.61% 5631 (143) (248)°l0 5756 21 0.37% 5784 f'iG37 [175)% Grades 2001-02 2002 03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 6-8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diif % Tolal Diff % Total Diff °/ ACTUAL 3049 x�a pa 3151 �ooc � 3294 boc xu�c 3274 xoc x�a 3169 x�oc x�oc Pfj3E13 3025 (24) (075196 3185 (80) 108% 3214 ($0) (243)�, 3295 2l 064% 3132 (37) (117)% Pr�3E.6 3011 (38) (125�96 3192 (75) 130°/ 3216 (78) (237�'r_ 3311 37 113% 3137 (32) (101)% Pf�3E 13A 3025 (24j (0 79)% 3185 �80) 1 08% 3214 (50) (2.4314;: 3295 21 0.64% 3132 (37) (1 17)% Prj3E.6A 3011 (38) (125)% 3192 �75) 130% 3216 i�81 (2.377YL 3311 37 113% 3137 (32� (101)% Grades 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 9-12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Drff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 4498 x�oc x�oc 4535 x�a pcx 4634 x�a pa 4663 r.� mc 5032 �xxc x�oc Ptj 3E 13 4455 (43) (0 96)% 4577 42 0 93°/ 4630 14) (0.09)% 4783 120 2.57% 4898 f�34) (2_66)% Prj 3E 6 4476 (22) (0.49)% 4594 59 1 30%a 4639 5 0.11% 4769 l06 227% 4880 �152) (3 02)"-/0 Pq3E13A 4455 (43) (0.96)% 4577 42 0.93% 4630 f4) 10.09)°4� 4783 120 257% A898 (134) (2-68)% Pp3E.6A 4476 (22) (0.49)i5 4594 59 130% 4639 5 011% 4769 106 227% 4880 it52) (302)90 All 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-OS 2005-06 Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Tolal Diff % ACTUAL 13,461 a�a zax '13,427 znc za 13,702 z� boc 13,672 z�a �ooc 14 O88 � �oa P�j3E73 13,307 (154) (114)% 13,485 58 0.43% 13,499 (203) (1.481°�� 13,839 167 122% 13,780 i3081 (219)%a Prj3E.6 �3,289 (172) (128)% 13,521 94 070% 13,517 1�85) (135)�;5 13,901 229 167% 13,812 127G) (� 66)% P�j3E13A 13.319 (142) (105)% 13,505 78 0.58% 13,449 (253) (185)`Y 13,787 115 0.84% 13,780 (308) (2l9)% Prj3E.6A 13,318 (143) (l00)°6 13,562 135 1.O1% 13,486 (2�6) (1.58)G 13836 164 120% 13,801 (287) (2.04)% prj13-14 Page 11 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP(Continued) Total = October 1 Ac[ual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3 73- 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase Diff = Number Prqeclion is under(-)or over AcWal Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 Using Averege Kdg Increase % = Percenl Projection is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3 13A 13 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A- 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty Birth Rates Grades 2006-07 2007-OS 2008-09 2009-10 2010-77 K-5 Totai Diff % Total Diff °/ Total Diff % Total Ditf % Total Diff % ACTUAL 6033 poc x�a 6142 �aoc �ooc 6198 x�c poc 6159 �ax z�oc 6208 �ax z�oc Prj3E'13 5871 (162) (2.69)% 6085 �57) (093)°i� 6179 (15) (031�%; 8254 95 154% 6282 74 119°/ Prj3E6 5921 (112) (186)% 6138 (4) (007)%. 6237 39 0.63% 6294 135 2.19% 6323 115 185% Prj3El3A 5869 (164) (2.i21`o 6059 l83) (135)% 6129 (69) (111)% 6237 78 127% 6252 44 071% P�73E.6A 5912 (121) �[.011I-5 6�94 (4$) (078)`/0 6172 (20) (042)°/ 6264 105 170% 6269 61 098% Grades 2006-07 2007-08 2003-04 2009-70 2010-77 6-8 Total Diff % Total Diff °/ Total D'rff °/ Total Diff % Total Diff % ACTUAL 3144 �ooc �ooc 3097 �ooc �ooc 3206 �ooc �ooc 3196 �ax xnc 3273 pcx xuc Prj3E13 3131 (73) (0411`b 3107 70 0.32% 3779 (27� (0.84i-6 3242 46 144°/ 3234 21 0.65% Prj 3E.6 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.67% 3195 i.i".i (0.34)`;:. 3243 47 1 47% 3236 23 0 72% Prj3E13A 3131 (13) (0.41)°E 3107 10 032% 3179 (27) (0.84�% 3242 46 144% 3234 21 0.65% Prj3E6A 3146 2 0.06% 3116 19 0.61% 3195 �111 (0.34)`/ 3243 47 1.47% 3236 23 072% Grades 2006-07 2007-OB 2003-04 2009-10 2010-11 9-'12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Totai Diff °! ACTUAL 5241 �ooc �ooc 5320 x�oc �ooc 5299 zbc �ooc 5234 x�oc zpc 5061 �ooc �occ Pr�3E13 5085 (156) (298).0 5�90 (130) (2A4j% 5129 f170) (321iS0 5W4 i1607 (3.Ofi1`.6 4921 i140) (277)% Pr7 3E.6 5086 1155) (2 56(i: 5192 (128) (2A1;% 5155 (144) i2 72)`h 5128 i 106j �2 031=�5 5027 @4) (0 67)% Prj3E �3A 5085 1156) (298�Y., 5�90 (130� (244)% 5129 1170) i3217"6 5074 i160) f306�t6 4921 1140) (277)°i Prj3E.6A 5086 (155) l2961io 5192 (128) (241)% 5155 f144) r_'=i'', 5129 1105) (20U'/o 5027 (34) (0-6%)% AIl 2006-07 2007-08 2003-04 2009-10 2010-�1 Gredes Total Diff % Total Diff % Tolal Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff °/ ACTUA� 14,418 �oa x�a �4.559 w� znx 13:672 uoc axx 14 589 �ocz �ooc 14,482 � x�a Prj 3E 13 14,087 (331) (2.30)°0 13,499 (173� (7 28)% 14,487 815 5 96% 14,570 it9l lG 13)% 14,437 (451 �0�t);, Prj3E.6 14,153 (265) (184);'0 13,542 �130) (5.99);6 14,587 975 6.69% 14,665 76 0.52% 14,586 104 072% Prj3E13A 14p85 (333) (2.31)% 13,447 (225) p64)% 14,437 765 6.60% 14,553 136i ip251�:: 14,407 p5� (052)� Prj3E.6A 14,144 (274) (190)% 73,510 (162) Q21)% �4,522 B50 622% 14,836 47 032% 14,532 50 0.35% prj13-14 Page 12 October 2013 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT F 7LLMENT PROJECTIONS -October 2013 TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS 5 BY GRADE GROUP(Conlinued) Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Prqecled Counts Prj 3 13- 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase �iff = Number Projection is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-)or over Actual Prj 3.�3A 13 YEAR HISTORY R King Cty Birth Rates Prj 3.6A- 6 YEAR HISTORY 8 King Cty Birth Rates Grades 201�-12 2012-13 2013-14 Average Average Historical Data is grouped by K-5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % K-5,68,9-12 aRiculation ACTUAL 6230 �oa pa 6489 pa xxx 6805 x�oc � pa �c pattem Prj3E13 6275 45 072% 6372 �177) (180)% 6659 �14G) (2�5)Y'� (51) �0787'/ Prj 3E 6 6267 3� 0.59% 6368 (121) (1 80)%, 6632 (173j (2.54)% (27j (0.39)% ARiculation pattem has no Prj3E'13A 6266 36 0.58% 6346 (�43) (22C�% 6643 (162) (2.38)% (70) (� G9)°/ numericimpactonefficacy Prj 3E 6A 6260 30 0.48% 6339 (150) (2 31)% 6611 (194) (2.85)% (50) (0 76)% of projeclion models Grades 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Average Average 6-6 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 3141 zxx xzr 3144 �ooc x�a 3264 poc xpc �ax � Prj3E13 3227 80 2.55% 3143 (l) (0.03)% 3230 (34) (1.04)% (15) (ODO)% Pr�3E6 3211 70 223°/ 3132 (�2) (0-38)% 32�3 (51) (156)% �1's) Q05°/ Pq 3E 13A 3221 80 2S5% 3143 li) (0 0;5)% 3230 (34) (1 04)% (15j (0 00)% Prj3E.6A 321� 70 223% 3132 (12) (038)% 32'I3 (51) (156)% (13) 005% Grades 2011-12 2012-13 20�3-14 Average Average 9-�2 Total Drff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 4992 zx�c pcx 4963 �ooc �ooc 4902 mc �oa �ooc pa Prj3E13 4901 (91) (182Ji� 4813 (150) (302)% 4773 (129) (2.63j% (81) ('170)% Pr�3E6 50'17 26 0.50°/ 4906 (57) (115)`% 4856 (C6) (094)% (521 (094)% Pr�3E 13A 4901 (91) (1 82)9% 4813 (150) (3.02)°� 4773 (�291 RB3)% 187) (1 7D�% Prj 3E 6A 5017 25 0.50% 4906 (57) (1 15)% 4856 (d6) (0 941`/, 152) (0 941`,f AIl 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 Average Average Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % ACTUAL 14,363 �cz zxx '14,596 � xxx 14,971 z� x�oc � �xt Pr73E13 14,397 34 024°/ 14,328 (�68j (184)% 14,662 (3G9) 1205)°; (57) �G.84j% Prj3E6 14,495 132 0.92% 14,0.06 (190) (130)% 14,701 f270) (180)% 5 (041)°;6 Pq3E13A 14,388 25 017% 14,302 (294) (2.01)°b 14,648 (325) (2171% (78) (0981% P�j3E.6A 14488 '125 0.87°/ 14,377 (219) (150)'7. 14,680 (291) (194)% (17) �05Fi)% prj13-14 Page 73 October 2013 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollm--' Projections-April 2014 BASE DATA -BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors ASSUMPTIONS: Auburn Factors il Single Multi- 1 Uses Build Ouf estimates received from developers 2074 SF 2014 MF Family Family 2 Studen[Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2014 as allowed per King Counry Ordinance Elementary 0 1650 I 0 2230 3 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2014-2020 Middle School 0.0760 � 0.0910 4 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2014-2020 Senior High 0 0890 0 0920 5 Includes known developments in N Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland deve/opments Total 0 3300 0.4060 Table Auburn School Distr 1 Development 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total LakelandlKersey Single Family 250 125 75 75 60 585 Lea Hill Area Single Family 100 100 125 125 50 50 50 600 Other Single Family Units 25 50 50 50 50 225 Total Sin le Famil Units 375 275 250 250 160 50 50 1410 Pro�ected Pupils Elementary Pupils K-5 62 ! 45 41 41 26 8 8 233 Mid School Pupils 6-� 29 I __21 19 � 19 � 12 4 4 107 Sr. High Pupils 9-12 33 ' 24 �I 22 22 14 4 4 125 Total K-12 i 124 I 91 83 83 53 17 17 _ 465 Multi Family Units 50 50 75 60 50 0 0 285 Total Multi Famil Units 50 50 75 60 50 0 0 285 Pro�ected Pupils. Elementary Pupils K-5 I 11 11 17 I 13 11 0 0 64 Mid School Pupils 6-8 i 5 5 7 5 5 0 0 26 Sr High Pupils 9-12 5 5 i 7 6 , 5 � 0 0 26 Total K-12 � 20 I 20 � 30 I 24 � 20 �, 0 � 0 116 Total Housing Units 425 I 325 ' 325 � 310 210 50 50 1695 M d School Pupils 6-8 I 33 25 26 I — 24 17 4 �l 4 133 3r_High Pupils 9-12 � 38 29 29 I 28 19 4 L 4 152 Total K-12 �� 144 i 111 ' 113 107 �� 73 � 17 ' 17 581 Cumulative Projection 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 Elementary- Grades K-5 I 73 130 �, 188 242 280 288 � 296 Mid School-Grades 6-8 33 � 59 84 109 125 129 133 Senior Wgh -Grades 9- 12 38 � 67 96 124 143 147 i 152 Total 144 I, 255 368 475 548 565 581 45 Buildout Data for Enrol' �t Projections-April 20�4 TABLE New Projects-Annual New Pupiis Added & Distributed 2 by Grede Level 6 Year Percent of average �� I, GRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2013-14 2014-75 2075-16 2016-17 2017-18 I 2018-19 I 2019-20 2020-21 Enroll & Level I KDG 1056 � 7 23°/, 1170 10 18 27 34 40 41 42 1 1077 I 7 36% 1188 11 19 27 35 40 42 43 2 1057 7.23% 43.43% 1124 10 18 27 34 40 41 42 3 1048 717°/, 1125 10 18 26 34 39 40 42 4 1054 � 7 21% 1123 10 18 27 34 40 41 42 5 1057 7 23% 1075 10 18 27 34 40 41 42 6 1060 7.25% 1076 10 18 27 34 40 41 42 7 1068 7.31% 21 85% 1072 11 19 27 35 40 41 42 8 1066 7 29% 1116 11 19 27 35 40 41 42 9 1226 8.36% 1159 12 21 31 40 46 47 49 10 1256 8 59% 34 72% 1229 12 22 32 41 47 48 50 11 1258 � 8.61°/a 1240 12 22 32 41 47 49 50 12 1336 9 14% 1274 13 23 34 43 50 52 53 TO�eIS 14617 100.00% TOt21 14971 144 255 368 � 475 548 565 581 TABLE 6 year Historical Data 3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade Level Grade os-o9 o9-to �o-�i i1-i2 iz-i3 13-74 6yrAve % KDG 998 1032 1010 1029 � 1098 1170 1056 17 7 23% 1 1015 I 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1076 W�� 7 36% 2 1024 998 1076 1097 1083 � 1124 1057 00 7 23% 3 1048 993 1013 I 996 _� 1111 1125 1047 67� 717% 4 1044 I 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1054 00 721°/a 5 . 1069 1030 1079� 101 S i 1070 1075 1056 831 7 23% 6 1096 � 1040 1041 � 1063 � 1041 1076 1059.50 7 25% 7 1034 1725 1060 , 1032 1086 1072 1068 171 7 31% 8 1076 � 1031 1112 1046 ' 1017 1116 1066.33 729% 9 1256 1244 7221 1273 1200 1159 1225.5� 8 38% 10 1341 ' 1277 1238 i 1170 1278 1229 � 1255 50 8 59% 11 1350 i 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1258 00 8.61% 12 1352 � 1410 1344 ' 1316 � 1321 1274 1336 17} 914% Totals 14703 14589 14482 14363 14596 14971 14617 33 100.00% %ofchange -078% -073°/ -0.82% 162% 2.57% change+l- �1I4� ��16'� i119i 233 375 46 Buildout Data for Enrollm��+ Pro�ections-April 2014 i ABLE 4 New Projects -Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3 13 by Grade Level Updated April 2014 Usesa 'cohortsurvival' GRADE 2013-t4 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-79 2019-20 2020-21 model assuming 100%of Actual Projected Projected Pro�ected Pro�ected Projected Pro�ected Pro ected previous year new KDG 1170 1207 1242 1278 1312 1345 1373 1401 eniollees move to the next 1 1188 1235 1270 1305 1340 1372 1400 1429 gradelevel 2 1124 1210 1254 1289 1324 1356 1384 1412 3 1125 1147 1231 1275 1309 1342 1370 1398 Kindergarten calculates 4 1123 1160 1180 1264 1307 1339 1368 1396 p�evious years number plus 5 1075 1155 1190 1210 1293 1334 1362 1391 K-5 6805 7114 7366 7620 7885 8088 8257 8426 Currentgeneration based on 6 1076 1095 1172 1207 1227 1307 1345 1373 % oftotalenrollment Other 7 1072 1101 1117 1195 1229 1247 1323 1360 factoruses 100% cohort 8 1116 1092 1119 1135 1213 1244 1258 1334 survival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3264 3288 3408 3537 3669 3798 3926 4067 hiStory 9 1159 1385 1360 1388 1405 1481 1508 1522 10 1229 1119 1342 1317 1345 1359 1430 1458 11 1240 1168 1055 1279 1254 1278 1286 1359 12 1274 1252 1178 1066 1289 1262 1282 1291 GR 9-12 4902 4924 4935 5050 5293 5380 5508 5630 Total 14971 15326 15710 16206 16647 17267 17691 18124 %ofchange 237°/ 2.50°/ 3.16% 3.95% 2.49% 2.46% 2.45% change+/- 355 384 497 640 420 424 433 TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3 6 by Grade Level Updated April 2014 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2020-21 2021-22 model assUming 100% of Actual Projected Pro�ected Projected Pro ected Pro�ected Projected Projecled Projected Projected previous year new KDG 1170 1215 1257 1300 1342 1382 1417 1453 1469 1486 enrollees move to the next 1 1188 1230 1273 1315 1358 1397 1433 1469 1485 1502 gradelevel 2 1124 1211 1250 1293 1335 1375 1410 1446 1462 1479 3 1125 1142 1227 1267 1309 1348 1384 1419 1436 1452 Kindergarten calculates 4 1123 1163 1178 1263 1302 1342 1377 1413 1429 1445 previous years numberplus 5 1075 1147 1185 1200 1285 1321 1357 1392 1408 1424 K-5 6805 7109 7370 7638 7930 8165 8379 8592 8690 8788 Currentgeneration based on 6 1076 1088 1157 1195 1210 1292 1325 136D 1376 1391 % oftotalenrollment. Other 7 1072 1107 1116 1186 1224 1236 1314 1346 1362 1377 factoruses 100% cohort 8 1116 1083 1115 1125 1194 1229 1238 1316 1331 1346 su rvival, based on 6 year GR 6-8 3264 3277 3389 3506 3628 3758 3877 4023 4068 4114 histOry 9 1159 1301 1267 1301 1311 1379 1410 1418 1434 1451 10 1229 1172 1311 1278 1311 1318 1382 1413 1429 1445 11 1240 1221 1161 1300 1266 1297 1299 1363 1378 1394 12 1274 1313 1291 1232 1372 1335 1361 1363 1379 1394 GR 9-12 4902 5006 5030 5110 5260 5329 5451 5557 5620 5684 Total 14971 15392 15789 16255 16818 17252 17706 18172 18378 18586 %Of ch2nge 2.81% 2.58% 295% 3.46% 2 58% 2.64% 2.63%a 7 14% 1 14% change+/- 421 397 465 563 434 455 465 206 209 47 Buildout Data for Enro'' �t Pro�ections-April 2014 TABLE 6 New Developments-Pupil Projection Cumulative ND3.13n by Grade Level Updated April 2014 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 model assUO7ing 100% of AcWal Pro�ected Pro�ected Pro�ected Projected Pro�ected Projected Projeded previous yearnew KDG 1170 1135 1125 1728 1150 enrollees move to the next 1 1188 1235 1197 1187 1190 1210 gradelevel. 2 1124 1210 125a 1216 1206 1207 1221 3 1125 1147 1231 1275 1237 1224 1220 1235 Kindergarten calculates 4 1123 1160 1160 1264 1307 1267 1250 1246 birth rate average plus 5 1075 1155 1190 1210 1293 1334 1290 1273 6805 7042 7176 7280 7383 6241 4982 3755 Currentgeneration based on 6 1076 1095 1172 1207 1227 1307 1345 1300 % oftotalenrollment Othe� 7 1072 1101 1117 1195 1229 1247 1323 1360 faCtOruSes 100% cohort 8 1116 1092 1119 1135 1213 1244 1258 1334 su rvival, based on 6 year 3264 3288 3408 3537 3669 3798 3926 3995 hiStOry 9 1159 1385 1360 1388 1405 1481 1508 1522 10 1229 1119 1342 1317 1345 1359 1430 1458 11 1240 1168 1055 1279 1254 1278 1288 1359 12 1274 1252 1178 1066 1289 1262 1282 1291 4902 4924 4935 5050 5293 5380 5508 5630 Total 14971 15253 15519 15867 16344 %of change 1 89% 1 74% 224% 3.01% change+I 282 266 347 478 TABLE 7 New Projects -Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6A by Grade Level Updated April 2014 Uses a 'cohort survival' GRADE 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 model assuming 100%of Actual Pro�ected Projected Projected Projected Projected Pro'ected Pro'ected previous year new KDG 1170 1135 1125 1128 1150 enrollees move to the next 1 1188 1230 1193 1183 1186 1205 gradelevel. 2 1124 1211 1250 1213 1203 1203 1218 3 1125 1142 1227 1267 1229 1216 1212 1227 Kindergarten calculates 4 1123 1163 1178 1263 1302 1262 1245 1241 birth rate average plus 5 1075 1147 1185 1200 1285 1321 1277 1260 6805 7029 7158 7254 7354 Currentgeneration based on 6 1076 1088 1157 1195 1210 1292 1325 1280 °/a of total enrollment Other 7 1072 1107 1116 1186 1224 1236 1314 1346 factoruses 100% cohort 8 1116 1083 1115 1125 1194 1229 1238 1316 survival, based on 6 year 3264 3277 3389 3506 3628 3758 3677 3943 histOry 9 1159 1301 1267 1301 1311 1379 1410 1418 10 1229 1172 1311 1278 1311 1318 1382 1413 17 1240 1221 1161 1300 1266 1297 1299 1363 12 1274 1313 1291 1232 1372 1335 1361 1363 4902 5006 5030 5110 5260 5329 5451 5557 Total 14971 15312 15577 15871 16241 %ofchange 228% 173% 1.88% 2.34% change+/- qi 5 4 71 48 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn ' �I District Developmenl �h since 1/1I07 March,2014 SINGLE FAMILY Actual Students Projected Students n urren O 6 StudentGenera6onFactors Develo ment Name Parcels Occu nc Occu ied Elem Middle HS Total em i e o Beaver Meadows 60 55 5 10 6 10 26 0.182 0.109 0.182 0.473 Brandon Meadows 55 55 0 13 9 11 33 0.236 0.164 0.200 0.600 Brid es 386 64 322 12 14 4 30 0.188 0.219 0.063 0.469 CaRin ton Pointe 24 24 0 5 2 1 8 0208 0.083 0:042 0.333 Greenacres 16 16 0 3 3 6 12 0.188 0.188 0.375 0.750 Kendall Rid e 106 89 17 7 4 5 16 0.079 0.045 0.056 0.180 Lakeland East: Portoia 130 114 16 18 76 13 47 0.158 0.140 0.114 0.412 Lakeland: Ed eview 373 347 26 14 2 10 26 0.040 0.006 0.029 0.075 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 66 10 35 14 13 62 0.530 0212 0.197 0.939 Lakeland:Villas At ... 81 16 65 4 0 1 5 0250 0.000 0.063 0.313 Lakeland: Vista Hei hts 125 125 0 39 12 15 66 0.312 0.096 0.120 0.528 Montere Park 239 191 48 13 7 7 27 0.068 0.037 0.037 0.141 Sterlin Court 8 8 0 2 2 1 5 0250 0.250 0.125 0.625 Trail Run 169 169 0 44 11 21 76 0.260 0.065 0.124 0.450 Vinta e Place 25 25 0 6 1 4 11 0240 0.040 0.180 0.440 Totals 1873 1364 509 225 103 122 450 0.765 0.076 0.089 0.330 Current Construction to be Occupied 2014 Estimated Students Based on Student Gen Factor ACtu81 StudBnts Projected Students Units/ CuITent To Be StudentGeneretion Factors Develo ment Name Parcels Occu anc Occu ied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Tota Beaver Meadows 60 55 5 10 6 10 26 1 0 0 2 Brid es 386 64 322 12 14 4 30 53 24 29 106 Kendall Rid e 106 89 17 7 3 5 15 3 1 2 6 Lakeland East: Portola 130 114 16 18 16 13 47 3 1 1 5 Lakeland: Ed eview 373 347 26 14 2 6 22 4 2 2 9 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 76 68 10 35 14 13 62 2 1 1 3 Lakeland: Villas At ... 81 16 65 4 0 1 5 11 5 6 21 Montere Park 239 191 48 13 7 7 27 8 4 4 16 Totals 1451 942 509 113 62 59 234 84 38 46 168 50 5/5I2014 Auburn S �I District Development� since 1/1l07 2014 811d'U March,2074 P Estimated Students�Based on Student Gen Factor Projected Students UOit81 CUIf611Y TO BB Student Generation Factors Develo ment Name Parcels Occupanc Occu ied Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 31 0 31 5 2 3 10 Anderson Acres 14 0 14 2 � � 5 Backbone Rid e 7 0 7 1 1 1 2 Sonata Hill 78 0 78 13 6 7 26 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 3 1 2 6 Cam-West 99 0 99 16 7 9 33 Estes Park 31 0 31 5 2 3 10 Ha reet Kan 8 0 8 1 1 1 3 Hazel Hei hts 22 0 22 4 2 2 7 Hazel View 20 0 20 3 2 2 7 Lakeland: Forest Glen At.. 30 0 30 5 2 3 10 Lakeland: Park Rid e 256 0 256 42 19 23 84 Lakeland: River Rock 14 0 14 2 1 1 5 Lawson Place 14 0 14 2 1 1 5 Me an's Meadows 9 0 9 1 1 1 3 Mountain View Estates 37 0 37 6 3 3 12 New Ho e Lutheran Plat 8 0 S 1 1 1 3 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 2 1 1 4 Rid e At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 �7 g g gq S encer Place 13 0 13 2 � � q Sti s Plat 29 0 29 5 2 3 10 Willow Place 18 0 18 3 1 2 6 Yates Plat 16 0 16 3 1 1 5 887 887 Totals 2014 and u 146 67 79 293 Grand Totals 230 105 725 461 51 5/5/2014 Auburn ; ol District Development� .✓th since 1/1/07 March, 2014 MULTI FAMILY UI11t5/ Current TO Be Student Generation Factors Development Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Lakeland: Four Lakes Apts 234 234 0 14 8 6 28 0.060 0.034 0.026 0.120 Legend Townhomes 11 11 0 0 2 1 3 0.000 0.182 0.091 0.273 Pacific Ave Duplexes 12 12 0 4 1 2 7 0.333 0.083 0.167 0.583 Seasons at Lea Hill Villa e 332 332 0 125 48 54 227 0.377 0.145 0.163 0.684 Trail Run Townhomes 115 115 0 14 5 2 21 0.122 0.043 0.017 0.183 704 704 0 157 64 65 286 0.223 0.091 0.092 0.406 2014 and beyond Auburn Hills AptITH 205 0 205 46 19 19 83 "D" Street Plat 32 0 32 7 3 3 13 Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 11 4 4 20 285 285 7otal 64 26 26 116 52 5/5/2014 �vg � � N SCHOOL DISTRICT ENGAGE • EDUCATE EMPOWER 7une 25, 2014 Kevin Snyder Director of Community Development and Public Works City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 Dear Mr Snyder, Enclosed you will find a copy of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2014 through 2020. The Plan has been prepared and adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors on June 9, 2014, in conformance with the Growth Management statutes of the State of Washington. Included in the Plan aze the following: ❑ Six-Year Enrollment Projections ❑ Auburn School District Standard of Service o The District's overall capacity of the 6-year period ❑ An inventory of existing facilities ❑ Impact Fee Computations ❑ District Capital Construction Plan The Auburn School District Board of Directors is requesting the plan be adopted by reference as part of the capital facilities element of the City of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan and that the school impact fees be set in accordance with the plan for the 2015 fiscal year The Auburn School District is also requesting a change in the fees for 2015 The calculated fee for single-family is $4,137.21, a decrease of$1,261 72, and the calculated fee for multi-family is $3,518.17, an increase of$130.33 Please advise if additional information is required or needed. Thank you for your assistance. Sincet ly, ichae e man ��'�� eputy S erintendent Business and Operations 'JUN 3 0 2014 Copy to� CITY OF AUt3UI�N Kip Herren, Superintendent, Auburn School District w/o enclosure P�NNING 8 DEVELOPMENT Denise Stiffarm, K&L GATES LLP w/o enclosure Jeff Grose, Executive Director of Capital Projects w/o enclosure James P Fugate Administration Building• 915 Fourth Street NE•Auburn,WA 98002-4499•253-931-4930 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which aze so closely related to each other that they aze in effect a single course of acrion: 1 The adoption of the Auburn School DistricYs 2014-2020 Capital Facilifies Plan by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of plam�ing for the facilities needs of the District; and 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School DistricYs 2014-2020 Capital Facilities Flan as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdicrion's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may also amend their Comprehensive Plans to include the Auburn School DistricYs Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Faciliries Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal. The Auburn School District incliides an azea of approximately 57 square miles. The Cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diainond, Kent, and Pacific and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checkiist and other informa6on on file with the lead agency This iriformation is available to the public upon request. 'This Deternunation of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued upder WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comtnents must be submitted by 4•00 p.m., June 6, 2014 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official. Mike Newman Deputy Superintendent, Business and Operations Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253) 931-4930 Address: Auburn School District 915 4�' Street N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 You may appeal tliis deternunation in writing by 4•00 p.m., June 6, 2014, to Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Anburn School District No. 408, 915 4�' Street N.E., Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: May 19, 2014 Date Published: May 23, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide inforriiation to help you and the agency ideritify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply " Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for non- project actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicarit," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively A. BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adop6on of the Auburn School District's 2014 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. The cities of Auburn and Kent and the King Counry Comprehensive Plans will be amended to include the Auburn School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algdna, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Anbum School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. A copy of the District's Capital Faciliries Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Aubum School District No. 408. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Aubum School District No. 408 915 4�' St. N.E. Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Mike Newman, Deputy Superintendent, Business/Operations Telephone: (253) 931-4900 4 Date checklist prepared: May 12, 2014 2 5 Agency requesting checklist: Aubum School District No. 408. 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District on June 9, 2014 After adoption, the District will forwazd the Capital Facilities Plan to the cities of Aubum, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and to King County for inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Plan will be updated annually Site-specific projects will be subject to project-level environmental review 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to purchase property for and construct a new elementary school and construct a new middle school over the neict six yeazs to meet projected student population increases. The District may also add portable faciliries at exisring school sites. The Disteict will also modernize Auburn High School. 8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they aze developed. 9 Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals df other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None lmown. 10 List any govemment approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The cities of Auburn and Kent will review and adopt the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of updating the cities' school impact fees and incorponting the updated Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Elements of both the Auburn and Kent Comprehensive Plans. King Cotinty will review the Plan for the purposes of implementing the County's iinpact fee ordinance and incorporating the Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Aubum School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of 3 each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan and each jdrisdiction may adopt a school nripact fee ordinance to iiriplement school impact fees. 11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several que§tion§ later in this checklist that ask ybu to desc�ibe certain aspects df your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. This proposal also involves the amendment of the cities of Autiurn and Kent Comprehensive Plans and the King County ComprehensiVe Plan to incltide the Auburn School District 2014 Gapital Facilities Plan as a part of each jurisdiction's Capital Facilities Element of their Comprehensive Plans. The cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific Comprehensive Plans may be amended to include the Auburn School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan and each jurisdiction may adopt a school impact fee ordinance to implement school impact fees. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. 1Nhile you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with ariy permit applications �elated to this checklist. The 2014 Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Aubum School District. The District includes an area of approximately 57 square miles. The cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and parts of unincorporated King County fall within the District's boundaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic landforms and gradients. Specific topographic chazacteristics of the sites at which the projects 4 included in the Capital Facilities Plan aze located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Spe.cific slope chazacteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmerital review c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surFace indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be idenrified at that time. f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the conshuction projects currently proposed iri the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project const(uctibn (for exainple, asphalt or buildings?) The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have reqtiired or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any The erosion potenrial of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the prbject is completed? If any, generally describe and give approxirimate quantities if Known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Suppleinental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmenta] review and relevant local approval pmcesses 6 when appropriate. The Dish-ict has been or will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the 3upplemental Sheet for Nonproject Acrions. 3. Water a. SurFace: 1) Is there any surFace water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salfinrater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School Dishict. The surface water bodies that aze in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-leve.l environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow pattems have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Aubuin School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surFace water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 7 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface watei withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood azeas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the dischazge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Rlan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will growndwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwatei'? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact goundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during projeot-level environmental review wheri appiopriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regnlarions. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for exarriple: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ., agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. 8 'Tl�e dischazges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regazding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environinerital review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has beBn or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d Proposed measures to reduce or control surFace, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 4 Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _ shrubs _ grass _ pasfure _ crop or grain _ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other = other types of vegetation A variety of vegetarive zones aze located within the Auburn School District. Iriventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plap may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have be.en or will be detennined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects includgd in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable locallandscaping requirements. 10 5 Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other• mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shelifsh, other• An inventory of species that have been observed on or neaz the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilifies Plan has been or will be developed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or neaz the sites of the projects includ.ed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed dnring project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the wmpletion of a life-cycle cost analysis of atl hearing, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site 11 design plauning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilifies Plan on the solaz potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or contrbl ene�gy impacts, if any Energy conservation measures proposed in connecrion with the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7 Environmental Health: a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If sb, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency services that riiight be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmenfal health hazards, if any The projects inciuded in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standazds, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they aze developed, when appropriate. 12 b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example. tra�c, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial azeas exists within the Aubiun School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilifies Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term bases only The construction projects could increase traffic azound the wnstruction sites on a short-term basis. Because the construction of additional school capacity will increase the capacity of the District's school facilities, this project may create a slight increase in traffic-related or operations-related noise on a long-term basis. Similarly, the placement of portables at school sites will increase the capacity of school facilities and may create a slight increase in traffio-related or operations-related noise. Neither of these potential increases is expected to be significant. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level envirorimental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8 Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional,u6lity, open space,recreational, etc. 13 b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The known sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have not beexi used recently for agricalture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects inclnded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environxnental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environxnental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capifal Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master Program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects inclu_ded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 14 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project-level environmental review i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 14,971 students. Enrollment is expected to increase to approximately 1'7,702 students by the 2019-2020 school yeaz. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or apy of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan tvith existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9 Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units wonld be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. 15 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whetlier high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projec.ts included in the Capital Faciliries Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project=level environmental review when appropriate. 10 Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aestheric impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be detemiined on a project- level basis when appropriate. 16 11 Light and Glare. a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur'? The light or glaze impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare nnpacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. f2ecreation: a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities witliiu the Aubutn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. The recrearional impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 17 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to initigation during project-level erivironmental review when appropriate. School faciliries usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Histbric and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There aze no known places or objects listed on, or proposed for, such registers for the project sites included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or neaz the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measu�es to reduce or confrol impacts, if any Appropriate measures will be proposed on a project-level basis when appropriate. 14 Transportation: a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 18 b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public iransit has been or will be addressed during project-level environinental review when appropriate. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included 'm the Capital Faciliries Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability haue been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environxnental review when apprbpriate. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmantal review when appropriate. g. Prbposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or vi+ill be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 19 15 Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will sigriificantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alazms,heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities aze available at the lrnown sites of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan. The types of urilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in inore detail during proje.ct-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing tFie service, arid the general construction aotivities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 20 C SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date Submitted: 21 D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of#he elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to �esult from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discha_rge to water; emissions to air-; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities, including new middle school and elementary school capacity and a high school modemizarion, will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazazdous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a,sigdificant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases a�e: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-]evel environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and tnay be subject to National Pollutant Dischaige Elimination System ("NPDES") peicnitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environxnerit. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may reqiiiie clearing 22 plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or wiil be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan aze not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measwes to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-]evel environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capita] Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4 How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentaliy sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for govemmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this tune. Appropriate measures would be proposed during project-specific review Arinual updates of this Plan will be coordinated with the cities of Auburn, Algona, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific, and King County as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School District's facilities planning process is part of the overall Growth Management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? 23 The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anricipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the azea served by the Dishict. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Faciliries Plan or the pmjects containeci therein aze proposed at this rime. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the DistricYs demands on transportation and urilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands aze proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 24 IIIIIIIIIII�I1niu"'q IEItIll�llGEit SCHOOI. DISTIZICT Educating every child for Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow August 22, 2014 Kevin Snyder Director of Planning City of Auburn 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 980011}998 Subject: Dieringer School District -Mitigation Impact Fees Dear Mr. Snyder: The Dieringer School District has completed the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2015-2020. In preparing the updated Capital Facilities Plan the District once more reviewed the question of the School Impact Fee Calculation. Based on the analysis of the DistricYs site acquisition and permanent facility costs,the Dieringer School District Board of Directars has determined that the appropriate mi6gafion impact fee far the permitting of a single family residence is $5,231 and$1,839 per unit for a multiple family residence. A review of the fees collected by the City of Auburn, on behalf of other school districts within the city, serves to support the validity of the Dieringer requested fee of$5,231 and $1,839 per unit for a multiple family residence. The property values within the boundaries of the Dieringer School District aze the highest in Pierce County;this causes site acquisition to be expensive and contributes to overall higher construction costs than other school districts experience. Therefore, it is most appropriate for the mitigarion iinpact fees coliected on behalf of the Dieringer School District to be adjusted to more closely approacimate the fees collected for other local school districts. The Dieringer School District requests that the City of Auburn adjust the mitigation impact fees collected on behalf of the Disirict to the $5,231 and $1,839 per unit for a mulfiple faznily residence established in the Capital Facilities Plan for 2015-2020. Please let me know if you need further information by contacting me at(253) 862-2537 Sincerely, �� R��IVEC� dy e r-Martinson upe tendent A�G 2 6 2014 cirvoFauauaN PLANNING&DEVELOPMENT 1320 17Rth Avem�e East • Lake Tapps,Washington 98391 • (253)862-2537 FAX(253)R62-R472 D+eri�vger Schoal District#393 is an Egvnl Opporhuirh�Las�iru�ion I!�llltEqii�. IIIN��f C��;,. �� . � I)ie�°in�e�° �'chool Dist�°ict Cap�tal �i�cil�ties 1'la� �015��020 BoaYd 14pproved June 17, 2014 DIERINGER SCHDOL DISTRICT NO. 343 1320-178�'Avenue East Lake Tapps,WasLington 98391 (253) 862-2537 BOARD OF DIRECTORS Pete George John McKenna Corey Pawlak Andrew Hart Monfe St.Johns Dr Jucly Neutueier-Martinson,Superintenilent . . ��1��111��r Educating every child for Confidence today and Contribution tomorrow Dieringer Schooi District No. 343 Dieringer School Disfrict An Overview Established in 1890,Dieriager School Dishict consolidated with Lake Tapps School District in 1936.The Dish-icYs three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School,Dieringer Heights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School,proviile K tlirough 8th grade education, and serve as hubs for oominunity activities as well. Dieringer Schoo] District#343 is located in wrincorporated Pierce County,bounded on the east by the White Riva, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and on the south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner 'I'he Aistrict suirounds the northern two-thirds of Leke Tapps and covers appmximately 5.5 square miles. The current student enrollment is appro�cimately 1,500 students in giades kindergazten through eight 3tudents in gradas first through tivrd are housed at Lake Tapps Elemenfary, constructed in 2005 as a replacement project.Dieringer Heights EIementary opened in the fall of 2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. Originaily consiructed in 1992 and added on to in 1998 and 2009,North Tapgs Middle School houses students in grades sixth-eighth. The district supports an ailditional 500 high school students who may select to attend aay public high school.The majority chose to attend Aubuin Rivecside, Sumner and Bonney Lake High Schools. The district has a long standing history of groviding high quality education for all our students. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to become successful, confident, conhibuting members of society Dieringei is composed of students who coiae to school well prepared and eager to]eam. Pazents are concemed with stadent success and provide outstanding support for their children and the Dieringer School Dishict. The PTA and many volunteers conhibute coundess hours and resources to our schools and students. T6e community supports the schools through the gassage of funding issues to support bus acquisition,student access to current technology and the constr6ctioa of scbool facilities. Impact fees, including interest, are heid in zeserve until used to meet District identified needs for site acquisition, additional facilities and improvements and/or technology capital expenditvres. DIERiNGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2014 Current Facilities Inventory of Public Schools TTAME CAPACITY LOCATION Lake Tapps Elementary 396 1320-178�'Ave E., Lake Tapps Dseringer Heights Elementary 547 21727—34�' St. E., Lake Tapps North Tagps Middle School 567 20029- 1?'�St.,E., Lake Tapps Iiigh School 0 TOTAL 1,510 � ,s - � + '�' �� - " e � 9 'e ° 'a � 1 o e P a a � ,;_'-:,�� .�„��lIFI, � A U B U`A N I � � � �-�,;� � i �� . _ � w' � °rN,�'8 • � ;�� . �i i . � � t;:l �, � , � f�� ` • • ' ! � ' � � �' i " • } I ar u• '� i' �, � �i � 1 � t : f�' � •;' +.. i, � � ,, , � l �� , _ . . _ � ' I ' ' 8 " # -" -a - - . . .l - - � �� ; sm�v !:� �� . 4 .:.� ,�u. �w i � ; MI/LI(LES�OOT � !NDIAN 4 '� ' ° .1fnLnfr � �m '�)`� T �� p � � , p `� ,,•-��. ,� � ; � 'ab-~ 9� `�'• ` .G�'+, ;��1� � ;tE.�, [ , � 4� -, I ��Fdf _ E � • � i � . 'G.,w � � _ .l` .��_, . �� ,Y ♦ u : �.��, _ _;w. . a i"-�""S'^ '_ rx_.. d`•�: — '� __" � ` � 4;'�Z�� •l r FI'i-_. � �' 7�--.-( 1 " � i I �' ---" .I:.y"''� '* �nn�l'L�`r ,:.^ \ � � d. •I .. _. . y;,•''�' =s!x.� q..�.�,�.v h6�4 r'.�,',.:`•, a 1 i ' ¢� �.��'''C^:i`, .il'�i','s.�� _ n� 'M'£` 1 �' ' :�.� - - ' ;�:.'„• '° �i 4� � � ' n«: .2: . �_.. y=�,T;�''• ' ' . -rfp°.,..,: m��tn. y� 1 ♦ � '�� __s _ xi: • ��7fr.�°. _a _ �t. ��P;..:: � � RES�Vi11� y?'i. Tr ✓i--• Y �. I Q' � • •-�' .� 4.' {hy :. .��„i. " "'��" II '7� 'r.mhi ' � - �.t-.._ n �L, Y?' �itr�'F� ••,i..(�e'ii i +� " _�p-� A I ,.� :,� ., '��`' � . ri,� � ,a'rs!� � � ' � �• :'r;'J�+1 " . � U f . .:� � . ' S•y :;`:�jr.;� SSef�'' [y , '%�'".�t t �� u .p ��P' ` �'i%��. t -;� i J' �'P�{ "f�.'Zi ♦ .:.Y. I� .Y 5.'�� y�I '1�'� {I � 1!i . � � . �� , � _ � .e' _.�~.rj•i �r } - Yl� � '.� ' . n c g T� M�i— _ _-�-� ...-.'�... y F � �� y y 'x A'.�.�•'�.q'a`u,'11�Y� � .. �'My1S 5w.� i ; �ti � �,` .14.�i `' 1 ��r r,�.:l�b.�`7: Y. .a 6 c..�' . 'WWW i+iy�R •y � � \ ' a7'S�� .ar S .' t:' 1 t 4j�Y"^P=aT_"j y I 7��i�.3yt'' � �.�.�.� 1� 5C � :S. '� �, LYSi::1r.Y:- �I! S � �;��" ; L •��..-.i„cy'j�t� _�iye � 1 �, '?{:' � sy'�x,�'^'7;._~.�. . � = t '4' � i m - _�S�_U M N ��R}i: ---- . - ' �'' '= .- ' `;`'"� +'' -'�� ' - -1 - '� �; ,A�"e - - ' -- !' _;. `38' - -o..� �';� 4 �.'��!`},�,'c'"g'�F x !a � �= i '19- a ��'- '':�'`,': � . o� i, �. 1 ��` -w.�'Fs.;�r8� j� t i i u ;_.• . J - . , �. , � • ?t:'a• s ` .� , � u - .... . .,.. . . .:�. �; �i- �. `n�i y;.r..�A.. "�.=•' .. , . .• . . . .:", 1 1 �}"':n� � ' ,I 7:'''` � k `�' �;.k; '�� ,k� i �� a OIERINGEItsCH0OL�18TA14T.M0.913 . .v.� �� `• ��z``'n'"�'.._'�;i ��.,.� tiR.�a{�"-. , r u �ISTRICTBOUNOARYMAP � _ — - . y '« +... ., � -- �� e •�. �{� ;�`��: 5. � � y^��' n u�c.,;.;� ' �, � —_�QG�t o+,..awm�, w.,.ma.R�mm � ` '4, '••�'„`a;5�1r '�,^�ti � :t� ic.� M r �� nmr.c +�� uim� Pv1o�� . '� f � oa `Y 4• ' �i 4p�•[�.��;�,. �`�h� ,�'l�;�� i � � � n aR+�WyP�-r�aa�+ �emtmwumr .'. � � � '�94� �f ` �� i1MWCe am�tisa6 i� µw9m"'.m �w ne` ��`t 1 J.._._ ._--S. _ "� _•31_' 1 :�a=,��'�,��`.'�,',�r� . �- --- - -a<-- -�� u y.�m�,.�ew , i � `'� ., i, �., , � �=^, :-,- � � -+w Y� � e:' i �p � �: , �,� a � p �.,.vu..a,-,-..�. � I � � i�' 'i' � �.�,.i �r• _..._ . � u � � � � � ' �Pl�rta}�ia .f-, •�. "�_ _y_ I � _ 'a e 'e s '� E e' E� 8 8 b � � a s � � q � $� �a Dieringer School District Proposed Housing Potential Enrollment Increase June 2014 Proposed Housing Units: Single Family- 195 x 452 generation factor= 88 students K-8 grade Multi-family-0 x .242 generation factor=0 students K-8 grade Enrollment Impact: 88 students K-8 Estimated 18 students a yeaz over the period 2015-2020 Potenrial enrollment increase=5.6% (based on 1,506 enrollment 13-14) Increase per grade level = 8.8 students (baseil on 10 grade bands) Approximately students per school: LTES 26.4,NTMS 26.4; DHES 35.2 District enrollment based on 13-14 and potential growth=1,594 students District program capacity** = 1,510 **current program capucity based oa full-and half-time landergertea Enrollment Projections The Dieringer School District is located in an area that continues to experience growth. Tlvs grov✓th can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrbllment trend data, proposed housing development, and the mitigation impact fees received for new construction. The District continues to experience steady growth in student enrollment This has sligiifly exceeded the Pierce County and Puget Sound Edncatibnal Service I}istrict (PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed cons�uction within the borders of the Dieringer School Dishict indicates that the growth trend can be ezpected to continue over the neict four years and beyond. This growth trend was slowed I in recent years by economic conditions, but has started to pick up again. There are 195 single family residents slated for construction within the next five years. The multi- family projects will contnbute an additional 0 residential units during that time. These projects, together with individual lots and general in-migiation, are anticipated to generate an additiona188 students in kindergarten through eighth grade. Information from Pierce county Planning & Land Services indicates that there is space and zoning for approximately 1,2U0 additional hovsing lots in the western portion ofthe districL This creates a potential for 542 additional students, kindergarten through eighth grade that are not iricladed in the above numbers. To partially address this growth, the District passed a 2006 bond issue to construct an additional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary Those classmoms were completed and occupied in 2009. The bond issue also piovided for the addition of an suXiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rboms at North Tapps Middle School. Those projects were completed in 2009 and the new instructional spaces are in use. Futpre anticipated growth will create the need to acquire an additional schoo] site and construct an additional school to house tl�e growing student enrollment HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS Spring 2014 #1 Fainveather Cove Estates (19) Pierce Co -Norice of application ]/24/Ol -26 Single Family Lots (26 homes will be built on 281ots) - 1600-2000 block of 16`h St. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy - 6 houses completed; 1 under constivetion #2 Rainier Plateau (10) Pierce Co -Norice of application 10/13/OD - 10 Single Family Lots -End of 34`�St. -Site wai-k completed; home conslruction TBD #3 Grandview Ridge II and III (9)Pierce Co - Off Sumner-Tapps Hwy across from Driftwood and Deer Island Dr. - Grandview Ridge Notice of Application 1/13/99 -49 Single Family Lots; coiripleted -III(91ots)no date (no change) #6 Tagps Meadow (Van Der Hoek) (11) Pierce Co -Notice of application 9/13/04 -1 1 ]arge lots -Across from Snag Island -Site work complete(no change) #7 Country Creek Estutes (9) Pierce Co -10 Single Family Lots -off 15�'near Edwards Road - One (1) house completed #8 Forest Canyon Estates (121) Pierce Co -121 Single Family I.ots-0ff Forest Canyon Rd. -Pernut expired #11 Carter Estates (1� Aubum -16 Single Family Lots—Lake Tapps Pazkway and 179'� -16 homes (no construcrion scheduled) 195 Single FamiIy Units to 6e built Standard of Service The Dieringer School Dishict houses children in elementary schools serving students kindergarten through fifth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth. High schobl students, grades nine through twelve, attend adj acent high schools, primarily in the Aubum and Sumner 3chool Distri�ts. Dieringer School District follows a traditional school calendaz beginning in early September and completing in mid June. The daily school schedules begin beriveen 7•49 and 8:45 a.m. and end between 2:l 7 and 3.15 p.m. The Dieringer School Dishict standard of service is based on class size and program decisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Based on the district philosophy regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroom kindergarten through thircl grade is 23, fourth through fifth grade 2b and sixth through eighth grade,29. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the pemzanent capacity of each school reflects these class sizes. In the District,rooms designated and assigned for special use are nat counted as capacity classrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instruction,physical education and art inshvction in separate,non-capacity classrooms. Computer labs are provided at each school as non-eapacity spaces. Special eduoation anii remedial programs are prbvided as pullout programs and do aot provide capacity At the middle school level,instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing 5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instructional space. DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2014 Dieringer School District Service Standarils Public School Facilities LSquare Feet Per Student) Elementary 5chool 120 Middle School 189 7unior High NA High School NA Dierineer Schooi District Individual Canaeitv Proiects (2015-20201 Elementary Schooi No. 3 400 High 3chool NA DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 343 � PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTS MAS'RER SCHEDULE March, 2014 Name Current 6 - Year Total Ca aci Caaacitv Ca aci 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Lake Tapps Elementary 459 396 (LTES Replacement) Dieringer Heights Elem. 537 547 Elementary School No. 3 400 400 X North Tapps MS Incl 51D 567 NTMS Additlons 2009 TOTALS 1506 400 1940 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343 Capital Facilities Plan Update, June 2014 CFP Projects and Financing Plan Sources and Uses of Funds (x $1,000) Sources of Funds Existing Revenue: Reserve $855 New Revenue: Bonds, Levies, Fees, State Matching Funds, Dedications, Mitigation Payments $21.575 TOTAL SOURCES $22.430 Uses of Funds Elementary School No. 3 ($21,375) Non-Capacity Projects: School Site , Technology Upgrades, I O55 And Board Approved Projects TOTAL USES $22 430 BALANCE 0 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 343 FINANCE�PLAN 2015-2020 June, 2014 Permanent Capaciry ProJects Unsecured Source of Funds Secured Source of Funds Estimated Esdmated Estimated Impact Bond 8 State Impact Cost Bond A . State Match ees Interes atch Fees Elemenlary School No. 3 21,375,000 21,375,000 0 0 0 0 0 Total Capacity ProJects 21,375,000 21,375,000 0 0 0 0 0 Non-Capacity ProJects School Site Elem. No. 3 500,000 0 0 0 0 500,000 Techrrology Improvements 465,000 0 0 200,000 0 0 265,000 Board Approved:Projects 90,000 0 0 0 0 90,000 Total Non-Capaciry Projects 1,055;000 0 0 20D,000 0 0 855,000 707AL PROJECTS 22,430;000 21,375,OOD 0 200,000 0 0 855,000 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 343 CapitaI Facilities Plan Update, 2014 Capital Facilities Requirements to 2020 Tiine Period Student Student Net Reserve Total Cost PopuIation Cnpacity Or(Deficiency) (CosUStuden[ X Net Deficiency) 2014 Actual 1506 1510 4 2015-2020 Gmwtl� 88 400 312 Dieringer School District Cost Per Student (2D14 D'ollazs) Elementary Middle Junior High High Schools Schaols Schools Schools $22,SQ0 $34,000 NA NA Sohool Im act Fee Calculation 6114 DISiRICT Diednger School District School Sile Acquisitlon CosL• AcresxCost er Acre /Focili Ca aci xStudent Generation Factor Student Student _ FociG Cost/ Facili Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Ac�eage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR - MFR Elementary 12.OD $5�0,000 400 0.322 0.172 $4,824 2,580 Mfddle 0.130 0.070 TOTAL $4,824 $2,580 School ConsVucBon Cost__ __ _ _ _ Focili Cost/Facil'rf Ca aci nStudent Generation factor x ermanenf/Total Sq Ft _ _ Student Student Facility Focllify Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Cast . Ca aci SFR MPR SFR MFR Elerrientdry No.3 $21,375,000 400 0.322 0.172 $17.2D7 $9,197 0:130 0.070 � TOTAL $17,207 $9,191 Tempora Facilt Cost: � � Facifi Cost/Facilif Ca ac x5tuderit Generation Factor x em ora /Total 5 uare Feet Student Student Cost/ Cost/ %Tem / Facili _ Facili Factor Factor SFR MFR. . ToialSq.F Cost Size SFR MFR Bementa $0 0 0.322 0.172 .,_ Middle $0 0 0.130 0.070 _ TOTAL $0 $0 State Matchin Ctedit: Boeckh Index X SPI 5 uore Foota e X District Match%X Sfudent Factor Student Student. BoeckYi SPI Dlstrict Factar Factor Cost/ Cost/ Indeic Footage �Match:� SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary Middle TOTAL - � - $D $0 Tax Pa meM Cradit: SFR � MFR Avera e Assessed Value 2013 $359,423 $257,4�7 Ca 'tal Bond Interest Rate esf -6/13 3J5`� 3.15% Net Preserif Value of Ave�a e Dwe111ng $3,042,614 I $2,128,229 70 10 Property Tax Levy Rate 2014 __$3.8026___ . $3.802G Present Value of Revenue Stream - $11;570 - -- $8;093 Fee Sumary:__ Sfngle Mulli le ami a il Sifie Ac uistion Costs $4,824.00 2,580.00 Permonent Pacilit Cost 17,206.88 $9,191.25 Tem ora Facilit Cost 0.00 $O.OD State Matcfi C�edit $0.00 0.00 Tax Pa ment Credit 11,569.84 $8,092.80 FEE $10,461 $3,678 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50� $5,231 FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50% � $1,839 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE for Dieringer School District No. 343 2014 Capital Facilities Pian Issued with a 14-day comment and appeal period Description of Proposal: This threshold detertnination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions,which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action: 1 The adoption of the Dieringer School District 2014 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan by the Dieringer School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan to include the Dieringer School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Pierce County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Aubum to include the Dieringer School DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Pian Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Auburn. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sumner to include the Dieringer School DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Sumner Proponent: Dieringer School District No. 343 Location of the Proposal: The Dieringer School DisVict includes an area of approximately 5.5 square miles. Portions of the cities of Aubum arid Sumner fall within the DistricYs boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated Pierce County Lead Agency Dieringer School District No. 343 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not pose a probable significant adverse impact to the environment. An environmental impact statement(EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days frbm the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., June 17, 2014. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Dr Judy Neumeier-Martinson Superintendent Dieringer School District No. 343 Telephone: (253) 862-2537 Address: 1320 178'"Ave E. Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 Appeals of this determination are govemed by Board Policy No. 6890 which can be obtained from Dr Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent, Dieringer School District No. 343, 1320 178�'Ave E., Lake Tapps, Washington 98391 and pursuant to WAC 680 and RCW 43.21 C.075. Date of Issue: June 17, 2014 Date Published June 3, 2014 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checkiist. Purpose of Checklist The State Environmental Policy Act{SEPA), chapter 4321 C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environrriental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement(EIS)must be prepared for all proposals with probabie significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposai (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, ff it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructfons for Applicants: This enviranmental checklist asks yoL to describe some basic infortnation about your proposal.Govemmental agencies use this checklist to detertnine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requirfng preparation of an EIS.Answer the questions briefly,with the most precise infortnation known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and caref011y,to the best of ybur knowledge. In most cases,you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or projeot-plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal,write"do not know"or"does not apply"Complete answers to the questfons now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about govemmental regufations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designaUons.Mswer these questions if you can. If you tiave problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to ali parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a perfod of time or on different parcels of land.Attach any additfonal information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects.The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide addiUonal information reasonably related to detertnining if there may be significant adverse impacL Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproJect proposals, even though questions may be answered °does not appiy." In addition, com¢lete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions(part D). For nonproject actions,the references in the checktist to the words"project,""appiicant,"and "properly or site° should be read as"proposal,""prepares,"and "affected geogrephic area," respectively A. BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable The adoption of a six-year Capital Facflitles Plan by the Dieringer School District.The Comprehensive Plans of Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of Sumner have been and/or will be amended to include the Dierirtger School Disfict 2014 Capital Facifities Pian in the Capital Facilities Plan Element of each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan.A copy of the DistricYs Plan is available for review in the District Office. 2. Name of applicant: Dieririger School District No. 343 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Dieringer School District No. 343 1320178'"Ave E. Lake Tapps,WA 98391 Contact Person: Dr Judy Neumeier-Martinson, Superintendent Telephone:(253) 862-2537 4. Date checklist prepared:June 3, 2014. 5. Agency requesting checklist: Die�nger School District No. 343 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicabfe): The 2014 Dieringer School Qistrict Capital Faciiities Plan is scheduled to be adopted in June, 20i4 and forvvarded to Pierce County, Cities of Aubum and Sumner for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comp2hensive Plan.The Capital Facilities Plan wili be updated annually. Slte-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-specific environmenta{ review. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal7 If yes, explain. The Capftal Facilities Plan reviews the purchase of addifional property and ttie construction of a new elementary school. 8. List any environmental Information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The above-referenced projects will undergo environmental review at the time of formal proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposais directty affecting the property covered by your proposal? Ifyes, explain. No. 10. List any govemment approvals or pertnits that will be needed for"your proposal, if known. Pierce County and Cities of Aubum and Sumner will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilfties Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of Pierce County and Cities of Auburn and Sumner 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposat, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site.There are several questions later in this checkiist tha#ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal.You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a non-project action.This proposal invoives the adoption of the Dieringer School DisVict 2014 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities neads of the DisVict and for inclusion in the Capital Facfli6es Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Plans for Pierce County, City of Aubum and Ciiy of Sumner A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Dieringer School DisVict Office. 12. Location af the proposal. Gfve su�cient infortnation for a person to understand the precise IocaUon of your proposed project, inciuciing a street address'rf any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a propasal would occur over a range of area,provide the range or 6oundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available.While you should submit any plans reqLired by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist The 2014 Capital Facilities Plan wfli affect the Dferinger School Qistrict.The District includes an area of approximately 5.5 square miles. Portions of the City of Aubum and the City of Sumner, and parts of unincorporated Pierce County,fall within the DistricYs houndaries. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS � Earth a. Genera!description of the site (circie one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous,and mo2 than 2/3 of Lake Tapps. I The Dieringer School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients, incfuding all of those listed.Specific topographlc characteristics will identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Specific soii types will be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Un"stable soils may exist within the Dieringer School District.Specific soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of environmental review. e. Describe the purpose,type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. lndioate source of fill. Individual proJects fncluded in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to proJect specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading proJects, as well as the purpose,type,quantity, and source of fili materials wiil be identified as appropriate to each project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, constructlon, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a resuit of construction projects currendy proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. Individual proJects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-specific basis. Ind(vidual projects wfil be subject to environmental review and local approva!at the time of proposal. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings?) Percentage of impervious cover with vary with each capital factlides project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion,or other impacts to the earth, if any Erosion potential on individual project sites witl be addressed during project-speafic environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and conVol requirements will be met 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (ie., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke)during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quanfities if known. Various emissions, mariy construcfion-related, may result from individual projects. Air-quaUty impacts will be evaluated during project-specific environmerrtal review. Piease see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissioris or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Off-site sources and neoessary mi8gation will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any Plans for individua! projects included in the Capital FaciliUes Plan have been or will be subject to environmentai review and relevant local approval processes, includirig obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonprojed Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, lakes, ponds,weUands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what sVeam or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Dieringer School District.The surface water regimes and flow pattems have been or will be researched and iricorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Will the project require any work over, in,or adjacent to(within 200 feet)the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 5ome projects may require work near these described waters. Individua! projects in the Capital Facilities Plan will tie subject to environmental review and local approvai requirements at the Bme the project is formaly proposed. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge rtiaterial that be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. infortnation with respect to placement or remova]of fill or dredge materiai will be addressed at the time of project-specific environmental review. Applicabte local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surFace water withdrawals or diversiohs? Give generai description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be add2ssed during project-specific environmental review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital facilities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicabie local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surfaae waters7 If so, describe the fype ofwaste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding discharges of waste materiais, if any, will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantlties if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources. Each project will be evaluated during project-speciflc environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been orwill be satisfied. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Descrihe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanKs or other sources, if any(for example: DomesUcsewage; indust�ial, containing the following chemicals. ., agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system,the number of such systems,the num6er of hbuses to served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. Impacts of discharged waste material, if any, have been or will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. c. Water Runoff(Including storm water): 1) Descri6e the source of runoff(including storm \water)and method of collection and disposai, if any{include quantities, if known).Where will this water flow?Will this water flow into other waters? If sa, describe. lndividual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences. Each project will be subject to environmental review and applicable local regutations. 2) Couid waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian will have varying ernironmental impacts and will be subject to appropriate review and local regula6ons prior to con"struction. Informatton regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actiohs. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation with the appropriate jurisdiction. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation faund on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree:fir, cedar, pine, other _ shrubs _ grass _ pasture _ crop or g2in _ wet soil plants:cattail, butterdup, bulrush, skunk cabbage.Other _ other water plarrts:water lily, eelgrass, milfoil,other _ other types of vegetation There are various vegetaSye zones within the Dteringer School District.An inventory of species has been or will be pr6duced as part of project-specific environmental review. b. What kind and amourrt of vegeta8on will be removed or aitered? Impacts on vegetation wiil be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review at the time the project is formally proposed. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. c. List threatened or endangered species known to he on or near the site. Spegific impacts to these species from individual projects has been or be determined at the time of project proposal and will be addressed during sita-specific, project-levei environmental review d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to enviro�mental review and Iocal approval at the time of project proposal. 5. A�imals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other• mammals:deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish:bass, salmon,trout, perch, crappies, tiger muskies other An inventory of species observed on or near sites has been or wi[I be developed during project specific environmental revfew. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sfte. Specific impacts to these species from individuai projects will be detertnined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions. c. Is the site pa�t of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migretion routes, if any,will addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be detertnined at the tlme of site-specific, project-levei environmental review. 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kfnds of energy (electric, natural gas,oil,wood stove, solar)will be meet the compieted project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heaNng, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a life-cycle cost analysis of aU heating, lighting, and insulating systems priorto allowing specific proJects to proceed. Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potentlal use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If sa, generally describe: Individual projects of this Gapital FaciliBes Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review. c. Whet kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-specific design phase and environmental review. 7 Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spili, or haiardous waste that could occur as a result af this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emergency servfces that might required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or conVol environmental health hazards, if any Proposed projects wilf comply with all current codes, standards, and rules and regulallons. Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and local approval at the fime of fortnal submittal. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may effect you�project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A varieiy of noises exist within the Dieringer School District. Specific noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmantai review. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a sho�t-tertn ar a lorig-term basis(for example:traffic, construction, aperation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the sita. Normal construction noises wouid exist on a short term 6asis during school construction.There could he an inerease in traffic or operations-related noise which would be addressed during project specific ernrironmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any Project noise impacts have been ar will be evaluated and midgated during the pruject-specific environmental review. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Dieringer School District, including residential,commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricultural,forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agrfculture? If so, describe. This question will be addressed during site-specific, project-level environmental review. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures located on proposed sites have been orwfll be identified and described during project-specific environmantal review when appropriate. d. Wi{I any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demoiished, ff any, will be identified as part of the project-specific environmental review process_ e. What is the curre�t zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning classificaGons within the Dieringer School Oistrict. Site specific zoning infortnation has been or will be fdentifled during project specifc environmental review. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed durtng project-specific environmental review. g. If appticable,what is the current shoreline master program designation af the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally serisitive" area? tf so,specify Environmentally sensitive areas, if any,will be identified during project-specifio environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of p"roject-specific environmental review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proPoseii projects will displace any peop{e. Dispiacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project-speciflc environmental review k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce dispiacement impacts,if any� Individual projects included in the Capitai Facilities Plan will be subject to project specific envimnmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any- CompatEbility of the proposai and specifc projects w'ith existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive pianning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing a. Approx(mately how many units would be provided if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be ellminated? Indicate whether high, mfddle, or low-income housing. Any fmpact of project proposals on existing housing have been or would be eva�uated during project-speciflc envimnmental review procedures. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or wifl be addressed during site-specifia, project-level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas;what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmentel review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-speci8c, project-level ernironmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any Appropriate measures to reduce or control ae"sthetic impacts have been or will be detertnined at the time of project-specific environmental review. 11 Light and Giare: a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce?What time of day would it mainly occur7 �ight or giare impacts have been'or will be determined at the time of project-specific envlronmental review. b. Couid light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of the project- specific ernironmental review. c. What exlst(ng off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of fight or glare have been orwill be evaluated at the time of project spec�c environmental review. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any Mittgatfon of light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project specific erivironmental review. 12. Recreation: a. WFiat designated and informal recreafional opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of fortnal and informal recreational facilities within the Dieringer School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Recreational impacts have been or wiit be addressed during project specific environmental review. Projects in the Capita! Facilities Plan may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to redube or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the prbject or applicant, if any� Any adverse effects on recreation stemming from individua! project proposals have been or will be subject to mitigation during the environmental review procedure.A school site usually provides recreatiorial facilities to the community in the form of additional play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. The existence of historic end cuitural 2sources will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientiftc, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites has been or will 6e conducted as part of project specific environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any Appropriate measures have been or wilt be proposed an a project-specific basis. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public sVeets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any Impact on public streets and highways has been orwill be assessed during project specific environmental review. b. Is site currently served by publlc transit? If not,what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and Public transit has been or wiil be assessed during proJect-speci8c environmental review. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? An inventory of parking spa�es and the impacts of specific projects on parking spaces has been orwfll be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue vrrill be fuliy addressed during project-specific environmental review. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of�water, rail, or air transportation7 If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site specific, project-level environmental review f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project7 If known, indicate when peak voiumes would occur Each project proposai has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. g. Proposed measures to reduce or controt transportation impacts, if any: Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project specific environmental review. 15. Public Services: a. Wouid the project result fn an increased need for public services (for example:fire protection, police protectfon, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anUcipate that the projects idenGfied in the Capital Facilkies Plan wiil substantially increase the need for other public services. Impacts have beeri or will be evaluated an a project-speciftc basis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems,fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors and sprfnkler systems. i6. Utilities a. Circle utilities cuRently available at the site: electricity,natural gas,water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,other Utilities available at project sites have been or will be identified during project specific environmental review. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity whi6h might be needed. Utiliiy revisions and consVuction needs will be identified during project-specific environmental review. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. � � Signatur • Dr Judy eume' M rhnsan, Superin en ent Date Submitted: June 3, 2014 D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpfui to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal or the types of activities likely to resuit from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and tn general tertns. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water, emissions to air, producfion, storage, or release of toxic or hazardaus substances; or production of noise7 To the extent this Plan makes it more likely that school facilities wiil be constru�ted, andlor renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impertneable surFaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase stortn water runoff,whfch could enter surface or ground water. Emissions to air could result fram heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, and from additional car and bus trips to and from the school for students and faoulty Arry emissions resulting frnm this Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or haiardous substances,with the possible exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment Noise may result from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred chitdren at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur,these impacts wouid afso increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time.The impacts would depend on the type, location and distribution of housing,for example,whether single or multiple family and the location of the school. Proposed measures fo avoid or reduce such increases are: Facilities implementing the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and, depending on the date of actual construction, may be subjecf to a National Pollutant Disch,arge Eliminatlon System ("NPDES")pertnitting requirements. Discharges to air will be minirtiat, and will meet any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Poilution Control Authoriiy Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals,fish, or marine life? The Plan itself wftl have no impact on these elements of the environment Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of piants and loss of animal habitat.To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and eliminated as habitat for animals.There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers wuld occur due to increased residenfial development.These impacts have been or will be addressed in m�re detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, flsh, or marine life are.: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated aPpropriately on a project-specific basis, but specific mitigatio.n proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. liow would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resulting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels. Reduced traffc resulting from construction of another neighborhood school may also reduce amounts of fuel consumed, 6ut it is not possible to quantify such reduction in consumption at this time.These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during projeot- spec�c environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Facilfties would be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentaily sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under stucly)for govemmenta! protecfion; such as parks,wildemess,wild and scenic rivers,threatened or endangered species habitat, htstoric or cultural sites, wetlands,floodplafns, or prima farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Plan shouid have no impact on these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other deveiopment made possibie by this Plan would affect sensitive areas. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avofd or reduce impacts are: No specific measures are being proposed at this#ime.Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-speciflc review.Annuai updates of this Plan will be coordinated w(th Pierce County, City of Aubum and City of Sumner as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmental(y sensitive areas.To the extent the School DistricYs facitities planning process is part of the overell growth management planning process,these resaur�es are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing pians? The Plan wfll not have any impact on land or shoreiine use that is incompatible exisfing wmprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None are proposed at this time. Actual facilities constructed to implement the Plan wiSl be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce Iand use impacts. 6. How would the proposal be Ifkely to increase demands on transportation or pu6lfc services and utilities? This proposai should not create substantial new demands for transportation. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create an increa"se (n traffic near new District facilities but also reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more students to watk to a closer school.The construc6on of the facilities induded in the Capital Faciiities Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utiiities, such as flre and polics protection, and water, sewer, and e(ectric utiiities. None of these impacts are likely to be significant.The impacts o� transportatio� and public services and utilities of the projects included in the Capitai Facilities Plan wili be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s)are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible,whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Dieringer School District Capitai Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment 3�Qos 18d��re.S �C* e Federal Wa�/ Federa!Wpy, 4VA �v p —L + 98003-5433 o O I Ub�IC SC.f 10��$ Pkone:(153)-945-2000 nmw ficns.ore July 1, 2014 Jeff Dixon Principal Planner City Of Aubum 25 West Main Street Aubum WA 98001-4998 Deaz Mr Dixon, Attached is a copy of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2015 Capital Facilities Plan. The Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education adopted this plan on June 24, 2014 The Federal Way Public Schools' Board of Education Resolution No. 2014-11 directs the Superintendent to submit the adopted Federal Way Public Schools' 2015 Capital Facilities Plan to the City of Aubum. A copy of the resolution is attached for your files. The expenditure report for the 2013 calendaz year is also attached. The Federal Way Public Schools' Boazd of Educarion requests the City of Aubum to decrease the 2015 impact fee to $5,171 for each single-family development and decrease the impact fee to $1,834 for each multi-farriily development. Sincerely, �� Sally D McLean Superintendent c: Board of Education Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster Enclosure: 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS School District No. 210 - IGng County 33330 - 8th Avenue South Federal Way, WA 98003 RESOLUTION N0. 201411 A RESOLUTlON of the Board of Education of the Federal Way School District No. 210, to provide to the City of Aubum the 2015 Cap'ital Facilities Plan. WNEREAS, the Federal Way School District Board of Education hereby provides bo the City of Aubum the Distriet's 2015 Capftal Facil'�es Plan, documenting present and future school facility requlrements of the District, and WHEREAS, the Plan contains all elements required by the Growth Management Act and Ciry of Aubum Ordinance No. 5078, which addresses concurrency, allows each school district to establish their own standards of service, and provides for future school impact fees. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Superintendent be authorized and directed to submit the adopted 2015 Capital Facilities Plan bo the City of Auburn. ADOPTED this 24th day of 7une, 2014. (��O�a�� i Board S�ce retary - r - �r � �GG�-e-�J �j-lf/.�.,� Di'rector Director � � � � � � � l'�' � � � . �s� ,..,�` �- . � -..�, j �.�- .w��,� C�' �~ �-= 'k� � � � � � � �� "';. � f:s� �Y�rI ::xr �. i �� ,.`,; , � I"��.µ �� RN �� y//� R� S I 7.i � F �� r rv 3 tA� 1 J �' ��y�, �i ti{T t �if{ ., i��1�� I �\�_ �t:� i.. �S l � ` � / V ' Y If t J 2., t� ! .. 1� l� . (1j� M fj / � � ± ��i�#ft yt r �, � ,, ` � ' { S. . .� � .,x x [� c ��. ' � � �: l�1 X � � 1 �� , - . _ '- _ _ _I . i . ' -. . I � � (r �I'� .� " : �'�' :�'�� -�� - -� �-�,1- - -'- - - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILTTIES PLAN Adopted June 24, 2014 BOARD OF EDUCATION Cazol Gregory Geoffery McAnalloy Claire Wilson Danny Peterson OPEN INTERIM SUPERINTENDENT Sally D McLean Prepared by Tanya Nascimento FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introducrion 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast- Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast-New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction I 1 Map - Elementary Boundaries 12 Map - Middle School Boundaries 13 Map - High School Boundaries 14 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMBNTATION Introduction 15 Building Capacities 16-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Suminaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2014 31-33 PLAN 1 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB)2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effecrive 1998, Federal Way Public Scliools has updated its 2015 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2014 This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Faciliries Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Plazining Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way plamiing azea, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region's need for hodsing, jobs, services, cultiire, and recreation. This Plau's estimated popularion growth is prepared with trus underlying assumprion. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction,which requires its use to meet the needs of the Crrowth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Boazd policies or management need. Currently, the District plans to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. The esrimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $106 million. The District will begin Phase I in Sm7uner 2014 Phase I consists of site work and prepazation for the portable village that will house students during the construction of the new building. Placement of the portables should be complete by December 2014 and will be in use in Jarivary 2015. Phase II, demolition of the existing classrooms and rebuild,will begin in January 2015 The exisring cafeteria, gynuiasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during construction. The District conrinues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. One such factor is SHB 2776,reinforced by the McCleary decision, which will phase in full-day kindergarten for all students and decrease K-3 class size from 20 to 17 This is proposed to be fully funded by 2017-18. Using projected enrollmerit for the 2017-18 school year, the decrease in class size would ci�eate the need for an additiona180 classes for K-3 students. The District currently has 530 olassrooms, in our 21 elementary schools &two K-8 schools and an additiona164 classrooms house.d in portables. This is an average of 26 classrooms per school. The 80 additional classrooms is the equivalent of 3 elementary schools. 2 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Another factor that will unpact capacity is E2SSB 6552. The intention of this bill is to improve student succ.ess by modifying instructional how and graduation requirements. One of the ways to improve student success described in this bill is to decrease the class size for laboratory science in grades 9-12. Current class size for grades 9-12 is 26 students. With the adoption of this bill, laboratory science classes will be decreased to 20 students per class. Using projected enrollmerit for the 2014-15 school yeaz, this decrease in class size would require an additional 124 classes offered and 25 addirional classrooms. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations nnpact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. The maps included in this Plan reflect our current boundaries. 3 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Sfate Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of informarion be gathered to deternune the facilities auailabie and needed to meet the needs of a growing community This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected fiiture faciliry requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan tliat shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. 4 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-51 Adelaide 1635 SW 304`" St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336`" St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298t°St Aubum 98001 Enterprise 35101 5`"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47"'Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308`� St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308`"St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mazk Twain 2450 S Staz Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300`�St Aubum 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314�' St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus(K-8) 1000 S 289`� St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327`� St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 ls`Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368�' St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12'"Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325`"Pl Federal Way 98023 Staz Lake 4014 S 270�' St Kent 98032 Sunnycre"st 24629 42°d Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320`� St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42"d Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300'"St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont(K-8) 26454 16�'Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-81 Federal Way Public Academy(6-10) 34620 9`"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 ls'Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308`" St Aubum 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314�'St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19`�Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360�' ST Aubum 98001 Totem 26630 40�Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy(6-12) 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS(9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320�' St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16`"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288`� St Auburn 98001 Todd Beainer 35999 16`�Ave S Federal Way 98003 Cazeer Academy at Truman 31455 28`"Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDTI'IONAL SCHOOLS Intemet Academy (K-12) 31455 28`"Ave S Federal Way 98003 Merit School(6-12) 36001 151 Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program(12+) 33250 21s`Ave SW Federal Way 98023 5 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Propertv Central Kitchen 1214 S 332°d Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Iviemorial Field 1300 S 308�' St Federal Way 98003 Educarional Services Center 33330 8`�Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332°d St Federal Way 98003 Surplussed Space MOT Site 1066 S 320`�' St Federal Way 98003 Notes: In January 2012, the Administrative Building, Community Resource Center, and Student Support Annex were combined into the Educational Services Center. Central Kitchen will be relocated to this site in during 2013 The MOT Site has been surplussed and are being inazketed for sale. Undeveloped Propertv Site Location # 75 SW 360th Street& 3rd Avenue SW—9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S— 8.8 Acres 60 E of lOth Avenue SW - SW 334th& SW 335�' Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320`�and east of 45�'PL SW—23 45 Acres 71 S 344th Street&46th Avenue S - 17 47 Acres 82 1�`Wav S and S 342°d St—Minimal acreage 96 S 308`� St and 14`''Ave S— .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locafions are needed to house students in the District. 6 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST-EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Portables Im act Fees. Federal Way High School Replace Exisdng Building, Capital levy request Increase Ca aci As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Federal Way High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High and Decatur High in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN NEEDS FORECAST -ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILTl'Y LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. 8 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOL., GO15 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources actFees(q $303,161 l�nd Sale Funds 2) (511.596,�6i) Bond Funds 3) $4,709,857 StateMatch 4) $13,153,110 TOTAL S6 569 63 Projected Revenue Sources Sta[e Match(5) $27,20Q000 Bond or Itv Funds(6) $7Q000,000 Land Fund Sales(7) $10,000,000 Impac[Fees(8) 5800, 'IOTAL 5108,000,000 Actual and Planned Expend'rtures Total SewredFunding andProjectedRe�enue $114,569,563 rrEwscxooi.s =�i�ine�eaena s� ei zoi6 xoi� ao�e ao�v Zo2a xozt T��i : :Tor�c�i;}'. .?=P�ior,:Ye"ats"� 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-t9 2019-20 2020-21 2015-2021 - _ ',��=1"x�',< MODFRiVI7.ATlON ANDIXPANSION r - -t�=':;�i�.�:e ==-==�.i'�`.;��`;., Fedeml W a Hi h School(9 ==-_�$SOb00 000 $45.000.000 $11.000,000 $56,000,000 �'-5106' �00`000 _ _-_ _ �='�_--- - Sl7'EACQNSITION _�:t�:.:•..+`_�:. -- -- Nortnan Center -----;r$7g5'004 5205,000 $215,000 $22Q000 $225,000 $235,000 $235,000 $1,335,000 �i-.�$2;120'000 lo mentTranstionPro ram)(]0) ,- � ,�-ti`?•':;�34 - '"`afi:'a 'I'FMPORARYFACILITIFS iy;l"�:`a,it�i'.t.``'.+=,;t'.' -" '- +..fi�t Portables(11) �`='=,a�'�';?#t;'.�:•:��:Y_; $200.000 $200.000 $200.000 $200,000 $200,000 $200.000 $200,000 $1.400.000 °'.'..�,:SP'��00'000 TOTAL :;=550'785` OOi $45,405,000 $11,415,000 $420,000 $425,000 $435,000 $435,000 5200,000 $58,735,000 =�$109¢20� 00 NOTES. 1 These fces are currentty being held in a KingCounty Cit}'ofFederal Way and Ci[y of Kent impacl fee accoun[,and will be avadeble for use by the Districc for sys[em improvemrnts. Tius is year end balance on 12l31/13. 2.These funds are capec[ed to come from the sale ofthe current ESC&MOT srtes and bond mtaest.Th�s�s year end balance on 12/31/13. 3. This�s the 12/31/13 balance of bond(unds This fiyvre mcludes mterest eaming. 4 Thts represents the balance of Stace Mazch Funds wh�ch will be used to m support the rebudding ofPederal Way H��h School This is[he balance on 12/31/13. 5 This�s an[�c�pated State Mazch for the rebuddingofFederal Way H��School Applicaz�on for funds waz made m 1Wy 2013 6.These include$IOm ofvoter epproved,but noe issuW and a S60m su-yrar lery appruved in No�ember 2012. 7 Pro�ected sele ofsurplus properties These fuuds will be used to re[ire deb[mcwred for the acquismon of a replacemen[Educational Support Crnter 8.These are projec[ed fees based upon Imown residmt�al developmrnts in the Distnct over[he nent suyears.This fibvre assumes$25,000 per month for the ne.v s�years. Tha figure has been adjus[ed to reflec[[he ewrent economy 9 Project budp�tt has been adjusted to match et�rwt pro�eM wst estimffies. 10 Nonnan Cen[er was purohased in 2010 to house the Employma�t Transition Pro�3am. The$2.1m purchase has been£manced throu�a state approved LOCAL pro�arn Ihrou�2020 l l.These fees represent[he cost of purchasmgaud ms[allmgnew portables. The portable e�.penditure m fu[ure}'ears may replue eustmg portables that are not func[ional. These may not inQease capanty and are not mcluded in the capacity summmy 9 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN This page has been intentionally left blank. l0 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 2 -MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary s.chools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service azea. The programs at Career Academy at Tnunan High Schooi serves students in grades 9-12. The following inaps show the service area boundaries fdi each school, by school type. (Cazeer Aoademy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the Disirict). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually Any change in grade configurarion or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Manageinent Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts aze different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new faciliries can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lighfly It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who aze required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is unportant to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete schooi facility School districts aze required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just azound a single development. 11 FEDERAL WAY PUL�LIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACII,I"CIES PLAN �� Federal Way �� Public Schools � EIEMENTqRYS[HCo�s . MIDDLEiCH00LS ;�� ` _ A�ELAIOEELEM11ENTaRY 36 fLNPUBIJCAGlDENf/ ��"" - t .. - _ 2 BHIGAOOON ELEMENTAPY 3D ILL4HEE MIDL'LE$CFi00L 1. - ' ;' � 3 CAMELOTELEMENTAAY 31 KILOMIDDLESCHOOL }� � a EN7ERPnISEELEMENTARY 32 LANOTAMIDDLESCF±OOL t 5 GPEEN GABLES ELEMENTMY 33 SAGUAYJFAMIDDLE SCHOOL I �� ' 6 LAKE�OLLOFF EIEMENTAPY 3q SpGNALIE MIDDLE SCHOOL �� ;" �Y":�L'� �. ] LAI(EGAOVEEtFP�ENTAPY 37 SEQWVAHMIDDLFSCHOOI �-�— - �- - -' �� - 8 LAKEIANOELEMENTA(tY 35 TpTEMMIDDLESCH�OI � I � _ I �' � 9 MANNPNAINEIEMENTARY 3B1 TAFACADEMY Lt� � { � �� -- . . 10 MENEDRHHILLEIEMENTAHY - - . 11 MIFHOfl LAKEELEMENTAHY i ° /�� ` - _ ' 12 NAUTILUSK-SSCHDOL Hi'uH5CHO0L5 / '_ - � 30 DECATUP HIGH -- ' 13 OLYMPICYIt1VELEMENTARY �� j I ll FEDEPALWAYHIGH e 11 PANTHERIAKEEIEMENTMY li 15 RAINIE9 VIEIY ELEMENTAAY 321 THpM1W51EFfER50N HIGH � . � � e.6�'tJ 16 SHEFWOOOFDPESTEIEMENTAAY 15 TOOOBEAMEPHIGH � ,..' ;� 1] SILVERLAKEELEMENTAflY a90 CApEEPACADEMY[etTPUMAN i � f� ' 3 1B 4AN LAKE ELEMENTARY 51 ETP/NORM1IANCENTEA ; . ' -" " F-: , 1.. �� "...., ' �. I 19 SUNNYCREAELEMENTARY = � �– ' 20 TWM LAICESEIFMEMARY . ADMtNISTRATSVE SI1E5 – 21 VALHALLA ELEMENTARY ,.'�� ,... � .� . `� 22 WILOWODOELEMENTAPv � 23 WOOOMDNT KA SCHDOL – � , _.`� i � . � 7 I a � y �y . � FWPS P0.0FERTY r"- ,�:j p� , r'i7 �= . � � ;�}� q ��:� . �� "�' , : � i � '• ' . , ; � _1 , lt .; q ,_ , ,. ___.. - s; ai , + m_ . _ � 'F: �� , i� ; - � r �_ � \� i • �� '`� , } � . � N� d ' :_� i_":; ' �I _ \ �. . i �.. r j .; yf a y� .� . � � I ' " _ � VI.:� { � �4Ia .C`'w 1`� , ��.:' �'� i :. � � t _ (I I ! ('.. _ ` `I — . L . ,h •� . f - � �� .i.. ..�p� �i". ,� :`.� t !� _ 4 ✓_:. �f ..+. . ,. . � � . � 1 :{.'. „ �: , ��,:� ; � �� :� �� /�� -�r — _, — J�� :_ �'-- d�� 'j �-. _ �t �1 j ELEMENTARY � �,� ,;_'� fi� ;='- BOUNDARIES = � �� ''�yl ''' '} , , , � �� , � ��. ' -', � y ,'.-_"- 3 .3�. . : . �-�� r-'._,. � . d i ' _ r '�, ��' �• i-�� ' � � N �Oat83 46 Q9 L2 �Mles DaGe:6.2 12 12 FEDF.RA[. WAY PiJBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAP[TAL FACILITIES PLAN �� Federal Way �`J� Public Schools � � ELEM1'.ENTNnY5CH00�5 ■ MIDDIFSCHOOlS ^ • ,j 1 ADEIAIOEEIEMENTAPY 36 RNPUBLICACADEMY +�A1 I�1 '� � � I' '. � 2 BAIGAGOON ELEMENTARV 30 ILLAHEE MIDDLE$CHOOL �j�y�� 3 CAMEIDTELEMENTAPY 31 KILOMIDOLESCkOOL - 1 ENTERPRISE ELEMENTANY 32 LAKOTA MIDDLE SCHOOL � 5 GREENGABLESELEMENTARV 33 SACAIAWEAMIDDLESCHWL � ��- 6 LAKEOOLLOPFEtfMENTARY 34 SAGHPLIEMIDDLESCHOOL d+ � 7 LAKEGFO4EElEMENTMY 1� � 37 SE4UOYAH MI��LESCHOOL � . 8 LAKElANO ELEMENTAPY � I — �- - �1*�, � . 35 TOTEMMIDDLESCHOOL - 9 MAAKRYAIN EIEMENTAPY � � �-}�; L� ` � 10 MEflEORHHILLEIEMENTpFY 3fl1 TAFACADEMV ,��F`�`I�'� � � Y�-' 11 MIFROX LANE EIEMENTAPY ��_�� HIGH XHOOLS � 12 NAUTIWSK-85CHOOL � � I 13 OLYMPICVIEW ELEMENTAXV a0 OKATtIP HIGH ��-�✓ M1 � µ I dl FEOEflAL WAY HIGN „I 3 � nl�� . r`� � 1� 1C PANTHERUKEEIEMENTARY d�y THOMASIEFFERSONHIGH ��-.a. � �7 � � '' �� 15 FAINIEP VIpN ELEMENTARY ��*'� L ' d5 TOD09EAR!ERHIGH � �� l J-2L� I6 SHER�I'OOOFORESTELEMENiARV ' "� � 4Y>I �\ 49p CAREFAACADEMY@TRIIMTN ➢ ft j� ! � �� ' 17 SIL4ERLAKEEI.EMENTARY �Z� �� - 1 IS STAR LAKE ELEMENT.t0.Y 51 ETP/NOflh1ANCENiEA 4 � ��-�� j �jY � ' �_ LLi[ I 19 SIINNYCPESTELEMENTARY Z - ,1'��r 20 PNINLAKESEIEMENTARY ■ AOMINIST0.ATIVESi'fE5 ��t�, �i � - �. - �..1 �� 21 4ALHALLA ELEMENTARY ��; l4� � � 22 K'ILOWOOD ELEMENTARY ��`� I `�.� Ipy.'� ' f f '��_� 23 4YOOOMONTKA KHOOL . -r �--�� } � � �Irf�� ' � . ■ FWPS PitOPERTY — L �` � �J~I�� U i'� ` ��i�� _ �' { �i �' � � �. r- �, ( � �k L � . _ � i'ti 1 Sf,�7� ��l}�-� � ,�l�l- � �>-+'�_1 5�1 �I�I T . " � ��'t Y �r � �' . � � �r�� F � Z' � � �� t ,.�i�� J, , � 1 L�- � �L� ` 1 + ...,y �'' —�I.� " ;�-,� . t-l . , ;�;,c i � } , , �� '�:1L s 4;' d .r�� E ; - j� }� n 1( { r � � 'iJ ,r� , l' , �` G�`N-� - �"{� �! �..� L• � tr ., � � r, �' ��1 �i�-r' r 1�§� S/_�, � '�� — �y �--' -�. i '� �„ �, '��' r ; y� '�� . ��' 4� ��- � , . � ,: � C� �-� - �;— '�l�} �• 'C, �� — �. : � r . ��j� _� �� 1�� ..-� �� _~ � MIDDLE `yT;, � � � } ;' ��(- ,' — }�r �i�,� , �_ ,;�; SCHOOL ' j-__,, . � �q',��, r � _^ - ,;,��; ;s BOUNDARIES Y �' ` � :�� a� ,.—a ,�,�-� - F;, � - N 061H3 66 69 L2 Mks Oate: 5.4.12 13 FGDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOI,S 20(5 CAPITnL FACILITIES PLAN �� Federal Way �`�� Public Schools : � E(EM1:EM1TARYSCHOOLS ■ MIDDLESCNOOL$ �''''� a 1 A�EIniDEELEMENTARY 36 FWPUBLICAGDEMY �'+-�"-J1N - -� , i-i 2 8HIG4�ODNELEMENTARY 30 ILLANEEMIDDLESCHOOL �,j,4fy �.' ', 3 CAMEIDTELEMENTARY 31 KILOMIDDLESCHOCL I�p �- , d ENTERPRISEELEMENTARY 32 UIKOTAMI��LESCHOOL p ' 5 GAEENGABLESELEh1ENTpRY 33 SAGJAWEAb!IDDLFSCHOOI M ' � 6 LAKE 60LLOFF EIEMENTARr ;q $(�GHALIE MID�LE SCIi00L ] LiKEG0.0VEELEMENTANY j� {� , � ' J� �^� 37 SEQWVAHMIDDLESCHOOL �. t c 8 IAKEUNO ELEM1IENTAPY � '"�, � J��' � 1 3 MARKiWAHiEIEMENTAflY 35 TO`FMMIDDLESCHOOI � 'r`� I_' / 381 T,:f ACADQNY � � I� � r 10 MENEDRHHILLEIEMENTARY � ��r- /� 11 MIRflORLANEELEMENTqRY ' ��/ _ � f� !� MIGH XHOOLS + + 12 NAUTiLU5K3SCHDOI . J'- il I d0 DEGTUR HIGH n � 13 OLVMPICVIEW ELEMENTAAY i I Gl FEDEflALWAYHIGH n l J 14 PANTHEPLAKEEIEMENTAPY �.��LIj�� . ��I, - '�`I,`� C21 TIqMAS1EFFER50N HIGH � ?5 FIAINIER4IFNELEMENTARY j, � \ 65 T0009EAMERHIGH i F� -I,� - \ lv SHE0.N'OODf-0flESfEIEMENTAIIY � � � 1J SILVEFL1KEEfFMENTFPY a90 �AREEflFCAOEMY@TPUMAN � � 4 18 SfAN W(EELEMENTARY 51 ETP/NORMANCENTER � y, . ',�� ` 19 SUNNVCNESfELEhffNTARY � -�}l� ��, _ N TWINIAKESELEMEhTARY ■ ADM➢JISTRATIVESITES ,-��'�yl ��{I, � ��_ �, � - 21 VALHALLAELEMENTAHY _{t{Ffl A� � t �' � i e - 22 WILOWOD�ELEMENTAflY } "l�J�l��'{ ? — I— 23 `NOOOMONTN-95CHOOL �,,,�^ -��J� ' �,y, u� i :�1I �-� l.r*5 � � q �� t � � /J I t r. FWGS PROPEFTY // � ��II �I . . � '. ^I / i�- ff f ♦ ��.1+ 11y-t.�� l' '�� Lii � �, ,�I �`I_u., v , -1 Y ��J � - ,l' ��1.,,� h�J ` .l `4t -� �� - � i � - � ' , ��.:�,�t r� �� ,� �„ lf' �.r_,.� �"•: � �'r �_�, I . , -- � �, r� K,c.�' `� �� 1�„�; � �� :; , �- � . � -�` -y 'r _�r r7 � -C'� `��i"" �� ..'i . . �� .. ��1. 1 !�./� �� i: , _I I ,� ' � �� Y '- r L�f _:. =4,i' '� � y� ' _; �I � .r `}f�L{ l�;/ ./, '},�..�5 4 - � 1 V!i). :1 � TT� ry� / I I I II �,��; ., � ,� � ��r,, �.r 9 -r�� . 1 I� �l { =�f_ Y L.L�LC}a A , ` � ��L f,� �f y.,i .. . � �� HIGH I `r'�i�� , � � "' . SC H 00 L , � I _ ,�_:� , , I ' �� '� � BOUNDARIES �� '�Il��f � � �` � :,�� ,_ � � �� ;;-� � N �mtaa ae a9 �.z �ies �ate:3.4.i2 14 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities-The Education Program Portable I,ocations Student Forecast—2015 through 2021 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units 15 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Buildin¢Canacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the DislricYs"standard of service"in order to ascertain the DistricYs current and future capacity The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes squaze footage guidelines for capacity,but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the DistricYs current tazget class size provides that the average class size for a standazd classroom for grades K through 2 should be 20 studenfs. Due to current economic conditions, the target class size for K through 2 has been temporazily increased. With the legislative compliance with McCleary, we intend to decrease K though 3 class sizes to 17 by the 2017-18 school yeaz. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the tazget class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Educarion Program (Special Edueation)needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Using the OSPI sqpare footage calculation as a base line,the District has calculated a program capacity for all schools. The following list clazifies the adjustments to the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standazd classroom for music instruction. All Day Kindergsrten: Every elementary school operates only all day Kindergarten programs. These all day Kindergarten programs require additional capacity because the standard classroom is available for one all day sessiog rather than two half day sessions. The District will operate 76 sections of all day Kindergartenin 2014-15 Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s)for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Lauguage Programs: Each elementary,middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students leazining English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs,except Totem Middle School. Wireless acce"ss has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed,these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. High$chool Careei Development and Learning Center(Resource)Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and cazeer development classrooms for students requiring inshuction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstait: Our district currently offers preschool progams for both special needs&typically developing students at 8 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (4 elementary&3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites. Alternative Learning Experience: Fedeial Way offeis students the opportuniTy to participate in an Alternative Learning Exp"erience through our Intemet Academy These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 16 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY SchoolName Headcount SchoolName Headcount FTE Adelaide 361 Illahee 835 843 Bri adoo❑ 258 Kilo 804 812 Camelot 238 Lakota. _ 732 739 Ente rise 427 Saca'awea._ _ 659 �666� Green ('mbles. 446 Sa halie 800 808 Lake Dolloff_ 415 Se uo afi 564 570 Lake Grove 352 Totem 759 767 Lakeland 361 Federal W a PubGc Academ 199 201 Mark'fwain 327 Technolo Access Foundation Academ ** Meredith Hill 425 Merit.School*' Mirror Lake 337 TOTAL 5 52 5 406 Nautilus (K-8) 319 Olympic View 340 "Midtlle School Aver e '736 744 Panther Lake 410 Rainier Vi6w 401 HIGH SCHOOL BiJILDNIG Sherwood Forest 395 PROGRAM CAPACITY Silver Lake 402 Star Lake 345 School Name � Headcount FTE �unn�crest 391 Decafur 1189 1 72 �in Lakes 309 Federal W a 1471 1 573. .alhalla 401 Thomas Jefferson 1289 1 79 Wildwood _ 312 ToddBeamer 1103 1,180 Woodmont K,8 . _ 318 CareeiAcadem atTivman 153 164 TOTAL 8,290 Federal W ay Public Academy 109 117 Em lo ment Transition Pro ram 48 51 Technology Access Foundation Academy*• FJementary_Average 360 Merit School'* TOTAL 5 62 5735 *Hi h School A�xr e_ 1 63 1 51 Notes. " Fedetal W ay Public Academy,Career Academy at Truman High School,and Employment Transition Program are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in ;he calculated averages. "' Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on [he Totem Middle School site. Merit School is housed entirely in portables on the Illahee Middle Schoo]site. 17 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAI.FACILITIES PLAN Portable Locations The Wasliington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resowces to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the yeaz and from yeaz to year. Portables aze used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be reguired to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity They also provide temporary housing for students unfil permanent facilities can be financed and conshvcted. When permanent faciliries become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some poRables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables aze not acceptable as permanent facilities. The District is investigating alternatives to portables. We aze currently in the planning phase of designing buildings that would require shorter construction time and provide permanent classmom space for our students. These buildings may replace the need for portables in the future. The followiitg page probides a list of the location of the pdrtable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. 18 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PORTABLE I,OCATIONS PORTABLFS LOCATFD PORTABLFS LOCATFD AT II.FINFIVTARY SCHOOLS AT IiIQ�SCHOOIS NON NOry INSTRUCTIONAL p`ST@pCT10NAL INSTRUCTION.�L IN5TRUCTION.�L Adelaide 1 2 Decatur 5 4 Bri adoon 1 FedemlWa 3 Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 9 1 Fnt rise 2 1_ Todd Beamer 8 (}eenCables 1 TAFAcade - S 2 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 33 7 Iake(�ove 1 1 i akelznd Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 Maror Iake 6 PORTABI,�S LOCATID NautIlus 1 AT SUPPORT FACQ.ITI6 Olympic Yew 1 1 PantherIake 2 MOT RamierYiew 3 TDC � 5 Sherwood Forest 2 2 TOTAL 5 Silverlake 4 Staz Lake 3 1 Sunn�crest 4 HFr1DSTARTPORTABL�NSATDISTRICfSI1'6 Twm Iakes 1 2 Valhalla 4 SherwooH Forest - I W ddwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 40 23 PORTABLFS LOCATID AT iNmDLESCHOOIS NON INSTHUCiIONAL �IVSTRUCTIONAL Nahee 3 Kilo 7 Iakota Saca awea 8 Sa halie . 1 3 Se uo ah 2 Totem Merit 3 TAF Acade 8 2 TOTAL 22 15 � In the 201415 school yeaz,students at Federal W ay HS will be housed'm a portable village durmg construction ofthe new classrooms. 19 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Student Forecast Student enrollment projecrions aze a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial esrimates that go into budget prepazation. The majority of staffing requirements aze derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials aze also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are d'uectly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocarional and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value(grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1 00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The districthas used this method with varying yeazs of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Enhy grades (kindergarten) aze a unique problem in cbh6rt analysis. The dish-ict collects information on birth rates within the districYs census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecring student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments aze evaluated below The first method is a statisrical cohoR analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These aze forecast of enrollment for one yeaz. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical infoiination and how they aze weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection softwaze package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment Mastei� software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This softwaze produces a five-yeaz projection of school enrollment. In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in Mazch 201.3 The model used to forecast next yeaz's enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rafes and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of soinething else(e.g. population)or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for 20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN the school-age popularion over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projecrions for the District to the yeaz 2022. Tliis mode] produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities aze a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections aze made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections aze studied annually The study includes information from the jurisdicrional demographeis as they project fiiture housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Sbhools reflect a similaz age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Ivlanagement for the State of Washington. Neaz term projecrions asstune some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five pemutting jurisdictions. Currently there aze three new multi-family complexes planned within the District. These three complexes have a total of 819 units. Two of the three developments will be open and ready for occupancy within the 2014-15 school-yeaz. Long range plarining assutnes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth pattems. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdicrions comprising the school district geography These projecrions create a vision of the school district community in the future. 21 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE(K Headcount=.5 FTE;Middle Schoo]FTE=.99 Headcount;Hi�School FTE_.935Headcount) Total K-12 Percent Caleodar Yr School Year Dementary Midme School Hlgh School FTE Chareg"e 2009 2008-09 8,865 5,155 6,456 20,476 2010 2009-10 8,738 5,119 6,594 20,451 -01% 2011 2010-11 8,753 5,142 6,544 20,439 -01% 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 -Q.i% 2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -0.7% 2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6,354 20,384 0.7% 2015 82014-IS 9,3/9 4,811 6,261 20,391 0.0% 2016 P2015-16 9,281 5,041 q092 20,415 0.1% 2017 P101617 9,398 5,145 5,950 20,493 0.4% 2018 P2017-18 9,477 5,154 5,971 20,542 0.1% 2019 P2018-19 9,575 5,130 6,063 20,768 l.l% 2020 P2079-10 9,645 5,264 6,707 21,016 LI% 2021 P2020-21 9,713 5,359 6,243 21,325 L6% ElementaryK-S Midd[eSdrool 68 HighSchool9-72 Enrolimeot History and Six Year_ Foregast _ _ 22,000 - - -� -- - ---- - - - 21,000 20,000 19,000 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 a a .�o ao �o �o m� '� '� r � � � °o�, �Q �� r, ��, o� o� o� o�� o� o� ar, � �o �i � �w v �is `ris �i� im �'�o `R�o 4a� School Year CFTE Zz FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Canacifv Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result damonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The informafion is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page suuunarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide informarion about what facilities are in place each yeaz. 23 FEDG1tAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPI'1'AL I�ACILI'I fFS P[.AN CAPACITY S UMMARY-ALL GRADfS Qud�ei - Projeci�d -- Calendar Year 2015 3016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 CAPACITY SchoolYear 2014-I� "_'01�-IG 2016-U 2017-IA '_018-19 2019-30 3030-3L DUILDING PROGRn M HF�DCO UN'r CA PA CfTY 19.004 19.004 19.001 19,304 l y 304 19,204 19,?04 FTE CAPACITY 19,4;1 19,431 19,431 19,631 19,631 19,631 19,631 Add or,auhtmc� chanacs to cnplcity Increasc('apacily �t I�cilcral Wuy I IS 200 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,004 I9,004 19,204 19,304 19,304 19,304 19,204 Adausted Pro ram FTE Ca acity 19,431 19,431 I9,63I 19,631 19,G31 19,631 19,631 CNROLLMCNT 6asicl�'l�I:;I�inrullmcnL 20391 20,415 20,493 20,542 '?0,768 31.016 21,325 InLcrnclAuudemy �nrullnwnt (I�AF'TE) (;I�1 l;l�l 1�1>1 �;I�1 I;I�I (�I�1 (�I:�1 Basic PT'E Enrolhnent wdhout Intemet Academ 2Q076 20,100 2Q178 20,227 20,453 20,701 21,OI0 SURPI..US OR(UNI10UtiIsD) PROCRAMFI'ECAPACITY ;:��) ((,6')) (il;) (59(il l42') (1.07D) 1.399 RELOCA"I'A13LL:CANACI'I�Y CurrentPortableCapaciry 2.12� 2.37i 2_;75 ?.�00 °.;00 2.300 2.300 Deduct Portablc Cupacity ('�} Add Nc�v Portablc Capacit�� 250 Ad usted Portable Ca acit 2,375 2,375 2300 2,300 '_',300 2,300 2,300 SURPI,US OR(UNIIOUSGD) P HOC RA M AN U RGLOCA'1'A13 LE CAPACIT'Y 1,730 1,706 1,753 1,704 1,478 1,230 921 24 FED�RAL WAY P[JBLIC SCIIOOLS 2015 CAPI"CAL FACIL("C[ES PI.AN ('APACITY S UMMARY-ELEMFN'PARY SCHOOI.S Budget -- Pro�ected -- Calendar Year 3015 2016 2017 20L8 2019 2020 202L CAPACITY SchoolYcar '_01=1-1> '_O15-IG 301(rl7 ?017-18 '_018-I�) 3019-20 30'_0-21 BUI L.DING PROGRAM Hti,AD COUNT CAPACITY �290 S,Z90 8.390 8.390 8,290 S.290 8°90 FTECAPACITY 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8.290 8.290 5,290 Add or subnnct chan�es m cap,icity Ad,justed Proeram lloadcount Cap�city 8_'90 8.'_90 8 Z90 8?90 3,390 8,290 3.290 Adjusted Program F"1'ECzpacity R290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 8,290 P�\'ROI.I,Nlfti�l� 6asic FTCI�:nrullmcnl 9.319 2283 9.398 9.�477 9.575 9.Cr}5 9J�i lnternet Acadenn (:1AP��-p)� �.'�,�� ;-rv � ;ni i ;��i 1.;•.� i �r��, � ��n� Basic FTEEnroLlment wrthout Internet Academy 9,283 9,246 9,362 9,441 9,539 9,609 9,687 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUtiGD) PROGRAMCAPACITY I`H`�t� �95G) (1,072) (�.I51) (I.2�9 1�19) (1,397) Rl?LOCATABLE CAPACITI� Current Portable Capacrty 750 I,000 IA00 I.000 I,000 1.000 I,000 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add ponablc capacrty at Panther Lakc I?S, 250 Sunirvcrest ES,& Valhalla GS Ad'usted Portable Ca ac' ],000 1,000 1,000 I,000 1,OOD I,000 I,000 S URPLUS O R(UN HOl iS ED) PROGRAM AND RELOCA'I'ABLI? CAPACITY 7 44 72) (I51) (249 319 397) NO�fLS: I [nternet Academy students are included in pro�cctions but do not require full hme use ofschool facilitics 3 Relocatable Capac�ty is based on the numberofportables available and otheradministraGve techniques wh�ch can be used to temporarily house studenfs until peimanent faciliUes are available �I'his is a calculated numberonly The actual number oFportables that will be used will be based on actual studcnt population needs Thc Distric[ m2y be�m to pull portables Iromdie instivctional invenrory Age and cond�tion of[hc portables willdetennmefeasibihry forcon[mued instruc[ionaluse 25 FEDERAL W[�.Y PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILI'CIFS PLAN CAPACITY S UMMARY- MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budgct -- Pro�ected -- Calendar Year 2015 2016 2017 2013 Z019 2020 2021 CAPACI'CY SchoolYear 207a-IS 201_5-I6 2016-17 20U-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 DUILDiNG PROGRAM HCADCOUNTCAPACITY 5,352 5.352 5,352 5,352 5,352 5,352 5,352 FTECAPACiTY 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 Add orsubtractchanges in capacity Adjusted Program Hcadcount Capac�ty 5392 5,352 �,352 5,352 �,i52 5,352 5,352 Adjusted ProoramFTECapacity 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 5,406 ENROLLML;N'I' BasicF7'EGnrollment 4,811 5,041 5,145 5,1�4 �,130 �?64 5.359 Inteme[ Academy (AAFTE)� (--t) ('J) (7�) (`�,i ;l�lj 1 -I�) (r-',) Basic PT'L:Gnrollment without Intemet Acade 4,737 4,967 5,071 5,080 5,056 5,190 5,285 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSGD) PROGRAMCAPACTTY 669 439 335 326 350 216 121 CLOCATABLG CAPACI'Cl'� � Current Portable Capacity �50 550 550 5�0 �50 550 :i50 Add/Subtract portable ca�acity Adjusted Portable Capacity 550 550 550 550 550 550 550 SURPLUS OR(UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND 2ELOCATABLG CAPAC('TY 1,219 989 885 876 900 766 671 NOTIS• 1 lnternet Acadeiny students are ineluded in pro,�ecTions but do not require full time use ofschoolfaeil�t�es 2 Relocatable Capacrty is based on the nuinber ofportables available and other admm�stratrve techn�ques wh�ch can be used to temporarily house scudents uutdpennanentfacihties are avadablc This is a calculated number only The actual numberofportables that will be used w�ll be based on actual studen[ population needs Tl�e Distnct may begm to pull portables Cromthe instructional mventory Age and condrtion oftLle poitables will determine feasibihty for continued mstruct�onal use 26 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ?01� CAYI"I'AL FACILITIIiS PLAN CAPACI"I'Y S UMMARY- FIIGH SCHOOLS BO(��L`I -- �'OIl'CIl'1� -- C2lendar Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 3019 2020 ?021 CAPACITY Scl�uulYear 2014-IS 3015-16 3016-17 2017-IS 201R-19 2019-2U 2020-21 BUILDING PROGRA M HEADCOUNTCAPACI�1'Y �,�6? >362 5,362 5.562 5562 5.562 5.562 FTE CAPACITY 5,735 5,735 5,735 5,935 5,935 5,935 5,935 Add orcubh��ct changcs in eeipocity Add cupacity to F'edcial Wuy HS 200 Adjustcd Progrmn Headcount Capacity �362 �.363 5,5G2 �,563 �,>G2 �,�62 JS62 Ad�usted Pro ramFTECa acity 5,735 5,735 5,935 5,935 5,935 5,935 5,935 ENROLLMCNT 6as�cP'fI:�;Enrolhnent 6,261 6A9'_ 5950 �,911 6.OG3 6,107 6,243 IntcmctAcademy (tAN�"f�:)� i�i�zi i,��•i i�u�r i'u�l Gr.,i �,=n�i i,�n,i Basic Ed wi[hout Intemet Academy 6.056 5,887 5,745 5,706 5,858 5,902 6,038 SURPLUS OR(UNI-IOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACTTY l32 I 1 I I 5'_') 190 229 77 33 l I U3) RELOCA'PABLF.CAPACII'Y� Qtrrent Portable Capacrty 3?S 825 825 7�0 750 7�0 7�0 AddiSubhnc[ portablecspaaty Subimct poitable capac�ty at Pederal Way HS 1'�1 Ad'usted Portable Ca aci 825 825 750 750 750 750 750 SURPLOS OR(UNIiOUSED) PROCRAM AN D RELOCATA R 1 J�: CAPACI7'l� 504 673 940 979 827 783 647 NOTPS I ]ntemet Acadeiny students are inctuded in pro�ections but do not requn'c full tmie use of school faeihties 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the numbcr ol'portables avadable and other administiative tcchn�ques which can be used ro temporardy house students until permancnf f3cilihes are avndable This �s a calculated mm�ber only The actual numbcrofportables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs The D�stnct may begin to pull poitables fromthe mstnictional inventorv A,e and condition ofthe portables w�71 determme feasibdity for contumed instructional use 3 Capacdy Ibr unhoused sWdcnts wi➢be aceommodated wdh (r�velmg teacheis and no plannm� time u� some classrooms 27 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Kine County, the City of Federal Wav, and the Citv of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Mulri-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a shaze of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substanrially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are driique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-fatriily units. The factors used in the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generarion factors from single-family units that were constructed in the last five (5) years. - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factoi is a copy of the Iiiipact Fee Calcularion for single family and mulri-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act. ➢ Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 5 yeazs. Plan Year 2014 Plan Year 2015 Single Family Units $5,363 $5,171 Multi-Family Units $1,924 $1,834 Mixed-Use Residential� $781 $917 City of Federal Way SF—$4,464 SF- $5,171 MF'—$1,562 MF-$1834 I In accordance with the City of Federal Way CounciPs changes to Ordinance No. 95- 249, which authorizes the collection of school impact fees. 28 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOO J15 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN STUDENT GENERATION NE W CONST�RUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARS Single Family Student Generetion Number of Numberof Number of Number of Number of ' Elementary Middle School High School; Total Single Family Multl-Family Elementary Mlddle School .High School' 9tudent Student Student ' ' Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellin s Dwellin s 9tudeMs Studenls Students Fadw Factor Fador Factor 14 North'LakeRim 36 4 3' 9 0:11]1 0.0833. 0.2500 0.4444 14 �W s[one 43 12 7 7 02791 0.1628 0.1628 0.�47 (13);Saghalie,Firs 34 8 4' 4 02353 0.9176 0.1176 0.4705 (13)Lakepomt 22 4 2 4 OH818 0:0909 0:1818 0.4545 (12)Ming CouA 15 4 3 4' 02667 0.2000 02667 0.7334 (12)Sunset Gardens 12 12 0 1 1.0000 0:0000 0.0.833 1'.0633 (11)Brighton Park 25 10 7 6 0.4000 0.2800 0.2400 0.9200 (11)The'Greens 20 4 9 4 02000 0.4500 0.2000 0.8500 10 Geekside Lane 53 14 10 8 02642 0.1887 0.1509 0.6038 (.10)Grande Visla 31 10 1 7 0.3226 0.0323 0.2258 0.5807 Total 291 0 82 46 54 Student Generatlon* 0:2819 0 1581 0:1856 :Q.8254 . 'Student Genera[lon rate(s based on totals. Mukl-Family Student Generation Elerrrenta Middle Sdiool Hi h Schod Total Aubum 0.723 0.091 0.092 0.406 Iss uah 0.165 0.052 0.051 0.268 Kerrt 0.324 0.066 0.118 0.508 Lake Washington 0.055 0.017 0.012 0.084 Average ( �0:192�" :OA57= .' 0.088: ;0:317 .. ' 29 � FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE Sc6001 Site Acquisition Cost: Student Smdent Facility Cost/ Facility Factor Factor CosU Cost/ Acrea e Acre Ca aci SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.2818 0.1920 __.$0 - - _ . �$0 Middle School 0.1581 0.0570 $0 $0 High School 4.85 $216,718 51 0.1856 0.0680 $3,821 $1,400 TOTAL $3 821 $1 400 Sc600l Construction Cost: Student Swdent % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor CosU Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cos[ Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 94.98% 0.2818 0.1920 $0 $0 . -------------- ---.._.. .. ---�-----. ..--------..__. ._..........- --------------- Middle School 96.87% 0.1581 0.0570 $0 $0 High School �� 96.65% $13,780,000 � 200 0.1856 0.0680 $12,359 $4,528 TOTAL $12,359 $4,528 Temporary Facility Cost: Student Student %Temp Fac. Faciliry Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total S Ft Cost Ca aci SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.02% $183,020 250 02818 0.1920 $10 $7 Middle School 3.13% 0.1581 0.0570 $0 $0 High School 335% 0.1856 0.0680 _ $0. _ $0 TOTAL $10 $7 ate Matching Credit Calculation: Student Sadent Construction Cost Sq. Ft. S[a[e Factor Factor CosU Cost/ Allocation/S Ft Swdent Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elemenary $200.40 0.2818 0.1920 $0 $0 Middle School �� u$200 40 � 0.1581 0.0570 $0 $0 High School $200.40 130 66.10% 0.1856 0.0680 $3,196 $1,17] Totel $3,196 $1171 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR _ Average Assessed Value (February 2014) $214,952 $88,900 Capital Bond Interest Rate (February 2014) ��w4 38^/0� �W�4 3$"/u�� Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $1,710,935 $707,610 Years Amortized 10 10 Property"Cax Levy Rate $1.55 $1.55 Present Value of Revenue Stream $2,652 $1 097 SingleFamily Multf-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $ 3,821 $ 1 400 Pennanent Faciliry Cost $ 12,359 $ 4,528 7'emporary Facility Cost $ 10 $ 7 StazeMatchCredit $ (3,196) $ (],171) TaxPaymentCredit $ (2,652) $ (1,097) Sub-Totel $ 10,343 $ 3,668 50% LocalShare $ 5,171 $ 1,834 Calculated Im actFee $ 5171 $ 1 834_ 2015 Im act Fee $ -5 171 $ 1 834 30 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2014 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2015 Capital Faciliries Plan is an updated document,based on the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2014 Plan and the 2015 Plan are listed below SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled fonvazd to reflect 2015-2021 and adjusted fdr anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule. The plan is found on page 8. SECTION III- SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Elementary capacity includes space for All Day Kindergarten programs at every elementary school. Changes to the Building Program Capaciries calculadon are found on page 15. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 20. STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2015 through 2021 Enrollment history and projections aze found on page 20. CAPACITY SUMMARY 'I'he changes in the Capacity Smmnary aze a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings aze shown as increases to capacity Capacity Summaries aze found on pages 22-2b IMPACT FEE CALCULATION- HING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. 'The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2015 Capital Faciliries Plan can be found on page 30 and 31 31 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2013 TO 2014 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generarion factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five yeazs prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2014 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan aze due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the yeaz placed in the survey The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 27 SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on Z013 estimate for replacing Federal Way High is $106,000,000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The current capacity of Federal Way High is 1538. The addition of 200 seats will increase capacity by 13%. Total Cost $106,000,000x.13 =$13,780,000 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school capacity by 51 students. Total Cost $2,100,000/2=$1,050,000 Cost per Acre $1,050,000/4.85=$216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary from yeaz to year as programs aze added or changed and construcrion cost may increase over rime. 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2015 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2014 TO 2015 IMPACT FEE Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilifies 95.65%to 95.23% Report#3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 435%to 4.77% Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $185,012 to $183,020 Updated 5-yr mlling average of Classroom portables purchased and placed in 2013 Construcfion Cost Allocation $188.55 to $200.40 Change effecrive July 2014 State Match 65.18%to 66.10% Change effecrive July 2013 Average Assessed Value SFR— Per Puget Sound Educational $208,480 to $214,952 Service District (ESD 121) MFR— $80,075 to $88,900 Capital Bond Interast Rate 3 74% to 438% Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.61 to $1.55 King County Treasury Division Single Family Student Yield Updated Housing Inventory Elementary .3271 to .2818 Middle School 1487 to .1581 High School 1896 to .1856 Multi-Family Student Yield Updated County-Wide Average Elementazy 1710 to .1920 Nate: The last district multi family Middle School .0490 to .0570 development, built in 2008, generates High School .0690 to .0680 a higher student yield than the county- wide average. Iiripact Fae SFR— $5,363 to $5,171 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR— MFR based on the,updated calculation $1,924 to $1,834 33 GLOBAL END Each student will graduate with the skills and academic knowledge to succeed as a responsible, contributing member of a global sociefy STUDENT ACHEIVEMENT Each student at every grade level will perform at or above the state or district standard in all disciplines. Each student's progress shall be measured annually by academic growth. RESPONSIBILITY Each student will take responsibility for their academic success, � exhibiting positive and ethical personal behaviors, treating others with respect, courtesy, and dignity PAREIVT ENGAGEMENT Each student will benefit from the relationship each school will establish with each parent, guardian or advocate � � �p��l ,A�� Federal Way Public Schools � � 'M� 33330 Sth Avenue S � � ��I'y �ti+1 'D�IS (253) 9 5 20 Oashington 98003 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2014 DETERMTNATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14 Day comment and appeals period Description of Proposal. This tlueshold determinarion analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which aze so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single action. 1 T'he adoprion of the Federal Way Public Schools' 2015 Six Yeaz Capital Facilities Plan by the Federal Way Public Schools for the purposes of planning for the faciliries needs of the District. 2. The amendment of the King County Couiprehensive Plan by King County to include the Federat Way Public Schools' 2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3 1'he amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Pederal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn to include the Federal Way Public Schools' 2015 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the City of Federal Way's, City of KenYs and the City of Aubum's Comprehensive Plan. This proposal may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Des Moines to incorporate the Federal Way Public Schools' 2015 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities Element of the City of Des Moines' Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Federal Way Public Schools I.ocation of the Proposal: The Federal Way Public Schools District includes an azea of appmximately 35 squaze miles. Areas of the ciries of Federal Way,Kent,Des Moines and Aubum fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency Federal Way Public Schools is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The Iead agency for this proposal has deteimined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the envirdnment. An environmental impact statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made aRer a review of the wmpleted environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency T'his information is available to the public upon request. This Detennination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 430 p.m., May 16, 2014. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on rimely comments and may retain,modify, or, if significant adverse impacts aze likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained,it will be final a8er the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Offibial. Ms. Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographics Federal WayPublic Schools Telephone: (253) 445-2071 Address: 33330 Sth Avenue South Pederal Way WA 98003 You may appeal this determinarion in writing by 430 p.m., May 16, 2014 to Tanya Nascimento, Federal Way Public Schools, 33330 8th Avenue Soath,Federal Way, WA 98003 Date of Issue: May 2, 2014 Date Published: May 2, 2014 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all govemmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with pmbable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide informarion to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This envimnmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the quesrions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best descriprion you can. You must answer each question accurately and cazefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions firom your own obsetvarions or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not laiow" or "does not apply" Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later Some questions ask about govertunental regularions, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmazk designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the govemmental agencies can assist you. The checklist quesrions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additibnal informarion that will help describ"e yow proposal or its envimnmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECHI.IST Use of checklist foi nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply" In addition, complete the Supplemental Sheet for nonproject actions (part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic atea,"respectively 2 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoprion of a Six-Yeaz Capital Faciliries Plan by the Federal Way School District No. 210 for the purposes of pianning for the DistricYs facilities needs. The King County, City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Aubum's Comprehensive Plan will be amended to include the District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan in the Capital Facilities Plan Element. 1'his project may also involve the amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Moines to incorporate the DistricYs 2015 Capital Facilities Plan. 2. Name of applicant: Federal Way School Dish-ict No. 210. 3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Federal Way School District No. 210 33330 Sth Avenue South Federal Way WA 98003 (253) 945-2000 Contact Person. Ms. Tanya Nascimento Enrollment and Demographics Telephone: (253) 945-2071 4 Date checklist prepazed: May 2, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: Federal Way School District No. 210 6. Proposed timing or schedule(including phasing, if applicable): The Federal Way School DistricYs 2015 Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District in June 2014. The Capital Facilities Plan will be forwazded to King County, the City of Federal Way, City of Kent and the City of Auburn for inclusion in each jurisdicrion's Comprehensive Plan. It will also be forwazded to the city of Des Moines for possible inclusion in this jwisdicdon's Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan annually The projeets included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review 7 Do you have any plans for future addirions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. 3 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The Capital Facilities Plan sets forth the capital improvement projects that the District is curredtly implementing. This includes construction of Federal Way HS. Additionally the plaa cdvers the purchase and siring of temporary facilities at various locarions. Current plans aze f6r all the projects to be complete by 2016 with atbletic fields to be coiripleted by 2017 8. List any environmental information you I�ow about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this pioposal. T'he projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will undergo addirional environmental review, when apprbpriate, as they ate developed. 9 Do you know whether applicarions are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Permits will be applied for with the appmpriate jurisdicrion for minor projects during the 2015 calendar year 10. List any govemment approvals or pe�mits that will be needed for your proposal, if kndwn_ The District anticipates that King County, the City of Federal Way, the City of Kent and the city of Aubum will adopt this Capital Facilities P3an into their Comprehensiv8 Plan. The city of Des Moines may also adopt ttvs Capital Faciliries Plan irito the Capital Facilities Elements of their Comprehensive Plans(when issued). 11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe ceitain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (L,ead agencies may cnodify this forin to include additional specific information on pmject descriprion.) This is a non-project action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Federal Way School District's 2015 Capital Faciliries Plan for the purpose of planning the DistricYs facilities needs. 'The District's Capital Facili6es Plan will be incorporated into King County's, the City Federal Way's, the City of KenYs and the City of Aubuin's Comprehensive Plans. It rriay also be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of the city of Des Mdines. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subj act to project-specific envirbnmental review 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise locarion of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal desoription, site plan, viciniry map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you aze not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any pemrit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Federal Way School Dish-ict. The District inciudes an azea of approximately 35 square miles. The City of Federal Way, parts of the ciries of Kent, Des Moines and Auburn, parts of wiinoorporated King County, fall within the District's boundaries. A detailed map of the DistricYs boundaries can be viewed at the DistricYs offices. 5 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, moUntainons, other The Federal Way School District is comprised of a variety of topograpHic land forms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the piojects included in Yhe Capital Facilities Plan aze located have been or will be identified daring project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site(approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characterisrics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be idenrified during project-level environmental review c. What genezal types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. 5pecific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Are there surface indicarions or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinit}/? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Federal Way School District. Specifio soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level envirorimental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quanrities of any filling or gading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appmpriate, to project-specific environmental review and local approval at the tiiae of proposal. Proposed �ading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of any fil] maYerials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generelly describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the conshucrion projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individua] projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject to local approval processes. 6 ENVII20NMENTAL CHECKLIST g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction(for exampie, asphalt or bixildings?) The proposed renovation projects will require the construction of impervious surfaces. 1'he extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each capital facilities project included in the Capital Facilifies Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project- specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth,if any The erosion potential of the projects inclyded in the Capital Faciliries Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approzimate quantiries if known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air-quality impacts of each project have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off=site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appmpriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-specific environmental review when approgriate and relevant local approval processes. The Dishict will be required to wmply with a11 applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific envimnmental review when appropriate.. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 7 ENVIRONMENTAL CIiECHI.IST 3 Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the nnmediate vicinity of the site (including ye.ar-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetiands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a netv✓ork of surface water bodies within the Federal Way School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the pmjects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified dvring project-specific environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow paitems have been or will be researched and inaorporated into the designs of the indivicival projects. 2} Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes,please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may reguire work near the surface waters located within the Federal Way School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge materiel that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the soisce of fill material. Informarion with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,purpose, and approximate guantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facili6es Plan have been or will be addressed daring project- specific environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-yeaz floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain azea, v✓ill be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6} Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? It so, describe the type of waste and anUcipated volume of discharge. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be dischazged to goundwater? Give general description, purpose, and appm�cimate quantiries if known. Individual projects includecl in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Pian on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Shaet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground frbm septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, contauung the follorving chemicals ., agicultural, ete.). Describe the general size of the system, the numbet of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the numbei of anunals or humans the system(s)are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any(inclnde quanrities, if known). VJhere will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, deseribe. Individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan may have storm wates runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the storm water impacts of each project has been or will be provided during proje.et-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applioable local storm water regulations. 9 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 2) Could w"aste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally descrilie. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the dischazge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific unpaots of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-speoific �vironmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will tie suliject to all applicable regularions regazding the dischaxge of waste materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplea►ental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, gound, and rwioff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the pmjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder,maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar,pine, other shrubs _ grass _ pasture _ crop or gain _ wet soil plapts: cattail,buttercup,bullrush, skank cabtiage, other _ water plants: water lily, eelgass, milfoil, other _ other types of vegetation A variety of vegetadve zones are located within the Federal Way School District. Inventories of the vegetarion located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specif c environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetarion will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alterarion of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects inoluded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when apprbpriate. a List thr8atened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capita] Pacilities Pian have been or will be determined during project-specific environniental review when appropriate. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plans, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilides Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. 5. Animals: a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or neaz the site: birds: hawk,heron, eagle, songbirds, other� mammals: deer,beaz, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon,trout, herring, shellfish, other• An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened or endangeted species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or neaz the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the pmjects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan on migrarion routes have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife,if any Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 11 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. Energy and Nahual Resources: a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) wil] be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires the complerion of a (ife cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighring, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the pmjects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the ame of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Acrions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solaz energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solaz potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any Energy conservation meastires proposed in connection with the projects included in the CapiYal Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 7 Environmental Health. a. Are there any environmental health hazards, inclyding exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explasion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the 5upplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe special emagency services that snight be recjuired. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Pmposed measutes to reduce or control environmental health hazazds, if any The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be sub�ect to projeot-specific edvironmental review and local approval at the time they are developed when appropriate. 12 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the azea which may affect your project (for example: tr�c, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial and industrial areas exists within the Federal Way School District. The specific noise sources that inay affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific envimnmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, consintcrion, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. The District does not anticipate that the projects will create long-term increases in traffio- related or operations-related noise levels. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts,if any The prbjected noise unpacts of the projects inclpded in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regularions. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a VJhat is the current use of the site and adjacent pioperties? There are a variety of land uses within the Federal Way School District, including residential, commercial, industcial, institutional,utility, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. The project sites covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have not been used recently for agriculture. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the proposed sites for the pmjects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environtnental review when appropriate. 13 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST d. Will any structures be demolishe3? IF so, what? The remodeling and renovarion projects will require the demolishment o£school structures. The stnictares that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that aze covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designarion of the,site? Shoreline master progam designations of the sites of the projects included in the C.apital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "euvironmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify Any environmentally sensitive areas located on the sites of the projects ingluded in the Plan have been or will be iiientified during project-specific environmental review i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Federal Way School District currently serves approximately 22,200 students. The student population is expected to increase to 23,000 by the yeaz 2021 This projectiop has been adjusted to reflect the current economic conditions. The District employs approximately 3,200 people. j. Approximately how many p�ple would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when apgropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained iherein, will displace any people. 14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displaceinent impacts, if ariy Individual projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan will be subject to project-specific environmental review and local approval when appropriate. Proposed mirigating measures will be proposed at that time,if necessary 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any The comparibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 9 Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan on exisring housing have been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects include.d in the Capitai Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appmpriate. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s)proposed? The sesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or wil] be addressed during project-specific environinental review when appropriate. 15 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. What views in the immediate vicinity wouid be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce ar control sesthetic unpacts, if any Appmpriate measures to reduce or wntrol the aesthetic impacts of the projecu included in the Capital Faciliries Plan liave been or will be determined on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 11 Light and G1aze: a. What type of light or glare wiil the proposa! produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review b. Could light or glaze from the finished prbject be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glaze impacts of the projects included in the Gapital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect}roiu proposal? Off-site sources of light oi glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan haue been or will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review when apgropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glaze impacts, if any Proposed measures to mitigate light and glaze imgacts have been or will be addressed during project-specific environxnental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation: a. What designated and infonnal recreakional opporiuniries are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recrearional facilities within the Federal Way School Dish-ict. 16 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recrearional uses? lf so, describe. The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. The pr6jects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed renovated school and support facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measwes to reduce or control impacts on recrearion, including recreation opporiunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to initigation during pYoject-specific environmental review when appropriate. A school site usually provides recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13 Historic and C�Itural Preservation: a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, natioual, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. There aze no lrnown places or objects listed on, or proposed for such registeis on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The existence of historic and cultural resources on or next to the sites has been or will be addressed in more detai] during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. b. Generally describe any landmazks or evidence of historic, azchaeological, scientific, or cultural importance lrnown to be on or next to the site. An inventory of historical sites at or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis when appropriate. 14. Transportation: a. Identify public s�eets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any The impact on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilides Plan has been or will be addressed dgring project-specific environmental review when appiopriate. 17 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST b. Is site cdrrently served by public transit? If noG, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Faciliries Plan and public ttansit has heen or will be addresse.d during project-specific environrnental review when appropriate. c. How many pazking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the pmject eliminate? An inventory of pazking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impaots of specific projects on pazking availability has been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets,not including driveways? If so, generally describe(indicate whether public or private). The need for new sueets or roads, or improvements to exisring streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project use(or occur in the immediate vicinity o fl water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or ivill be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. £ T-Iow many vehiculaz trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volnrimes wbuld occur. The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during pmject-specific environmental review when appropriate. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any The mitigation of traffic impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protecrion,police protection,health caze, schools,other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substantially increase the need for other public services. b. Proposed measwes to reduce or control direct impacts on public services,if any 18 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLTST Remodeled/renovated school or facilities will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alazms,heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. Circle urilities currendy available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitazy sewer utilities aze available at the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project- specific environmentai review when appropriate. b. Describe the udlities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construcdon activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity wtiich might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during prbject-specific environmental review when appmpriate. C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relyin on them to ma s decision. Signature: Date Subinitt : May 2, 2014 19 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST D SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project acrions) Because these questions aze very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the eictent the proposal, or the types of acrivities likely to result from the proposal, would afFect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general teims. 1 How would the pmposal be likely to increase dischazge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazazdous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed and/or renovated and remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely Additional impermeable surfaees, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads, and playgrounds could increase storm water nxnoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facitities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the producrion of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases aze: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Storm water detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/ar City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Eliminarion System ("NPDES") perxnitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? 'The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no imp"act on these elements of the environment. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. T'he projects included in the Plan are not likely to geaerate severe impacts on fish or marine life. 20 ENVIRUNMENTAL CHECKLIST Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specifio measures to pibtect and wnserve plants, animals, and fish gannot be identified at this tiine. Specific mitigation proposals have been or will be identifred, however, during project- specific en4irbntnental review when appropriate. 3 How wodld the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natura] resources? The constrncrion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the cdnsnmpdon of energy. Proposed meas�ues to protect or conserva energy and naturai resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan wiil be constructed in accordanoe with applicable energy efficiency standazds. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use oz af'fect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for govemmedtal protection; such as pazks,wilderness,wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains,or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual grojects wntained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific envimnmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the ciues of Federal Way, Kent, Des Moines, and Aubum as part of the Crrowth Management Acf process, one of the pwposes of which is to protect envirbnmentally sensitive areas. To the eactent the Dishict's faeilities planning process is part of the overall growth manage;nent planning process,these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How wbuld the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would atlow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompataible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing domprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the pmjects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the azea served by the bistrict. Proposed meastires to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan o� the projects coritained therein aze proposed at this rime. 21 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportarion or public services and urilities? The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the DistricYs need for public services and utilities. Upon the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, however, the District does not anticipate that its need for public services and utilities will increase substantially beyond existing]evels. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands aze proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict wiYh local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. 22 � ( � � � � �� 1 �� i t , , 9 r 1 { i i � � ° ' � � } ] � j I � � � I ti � � , << � '_.-� � _� `� '� �j� _ _ _1 . �' - f - � -i '� - � - '_� i ,J � ' � _ �_ � j �_ �� .� � ' � � r� , � , . 1 , i�a� . l�� a: � �a?c�_ _>; _'�� a_�ni s �� a �� - �� g �� TM � � SCHOOL DISTRICT April 2014 ' J ;' f � \ � �j ; �S � � � - { �' � �' � i I � � � � �: � _i � . � � t , � - � � ^ � � '' � � �` J' � � ._ _...� _� � ,�__. � .__ � . � �a , ; � �� ' '�' I ; � ' � � ' , _, ? i �a :i� � � ��;c'. _:�� s= a�n� _ _ � _ - - -' - -f - - ./� _ � ' - - -- - �� ✓ � 6�a�� 4�� TM �� SCHCJOL DISTRICT ApriC 2014 " i q � �� } � � a j ; fi ' � � ' �� — ' ; � ; p � i r ; , s : ; i � i s _� , ' � � i -� - � �.� ` .9 � � � � ; 'i ` � � � , ' j a � fi j � � ' '_� � ,. � --_i . j _� ...�'� -:� - . ��' __3 �,'� ... � _..1 _.- r �'� � �Om�9 � V@'8�� 4J�LS��'�� P�� Z014-2015 � 2019 - 2020 April 20'�4 Kent Schooi District No. 415 12033 SE 256'"Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 �� 5'L`HC7t3:v Ct t�:RiC7 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Debbie Straus, President Ms. Karen DeBruler, Vice President Ms. Agda Burchard, Legislative Representative Mr Russ Hanscom, Director Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Director ADAAINISTRATION Dr Edward Lee Vargas Superirrtendent af Schoois Dr Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer Ralph Fortunato, CSBS, Director of Fiscal Senrices Fred Long, Director of Facilities Services Gwenn Escher-Derdowski, Planning Administratar Kerrt School Datrict Six-Year Capital FacilRies Plan April 2014 � �. f -_ : . , ,0 , Y , : . , ; ; ., , ' ' ' , '. � : : ; ; ` : : Si.�2'earCap�itaC�FaciCties �Can 7a6Ce af Contents Section Page Number I Executive Summary 2 I I Six-Year Enroiiment Projection 8� History 4 I I I District Standard of Service 8 I V Inventory, Capaciiy & Maps of Existing Schools i l V Six-Year Planning & Construction Plan—Site Map 14 V I Portable Ciassrooms 17 V I I Projected Classroom Capacity 18 V I I I Finance Plan, Cost Basis and Impact Fee Schedules 23 I X Summary of Ghanges to Previous Plan 31 X Appendizes 32 Kent School Dishiet S&-Year Cap(tal Fadlities Plan DRAFT April 2014 I Executive Summary This Six-Year Capita! Facilities Plan (the "Pian") has been prepared by the Kent School District (the "District") as the organization's capital facilities planning 8ocument, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.0 C 21A.43 and Cfies of Kent, Covington, Renton, Aubum, Black Diamond, Mapie Valiey, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2014 for the 2013-2014 school year This Pian is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Ptan is not intended to be the sole planning document for ail of the DistricYs needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of PCent, Covington, Aubum and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee-imptementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Aubum must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Pfan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity While the State Superirrtendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and Cily codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average c�pacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. (wminued) Kent School Dlstrict Stz-Year Capltal FaGlttles Plan April 2014 Page 2 I Exscutive Summary ��orn��eu> The capacity of each school i� the District is caiculated based on the District standard of service and the existing inventory of permanerit facilities. l'he District's program capacity of pertnanent faalities reflects program changes and the reduction of class size ta meet the standard ot service for Kent School District. Portables provide addftional transitional capacity Kent School District is the fourth largest disfiot in the state. Enrollment is eleetronically reported morithly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction ("OSPI") on FoRn P-223. Afthough funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enro(Iment on October 1 is a widely recognized °snapshot in time" that is used to report the DistricYs enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The Board of Directors approved Full Day Kindergarten ("FDK") for all Elementary Schools in 2011=12 and FDK projections are used to forecast Kindergarten enrbllment in future years. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintendent of Public {nstruction to temporarily re-open the former Kent Elementary School at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility will be used to house the kindergarten and � early child education classes for both Kent and Neely-O'Brien Elementary to alfeviate overcrowding at those schools. This bui{ding will re-open in fall 2014 as the Kent Va{ley Early Leaming Center The Distrid's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. A financing plan is included in Section V I I I which demonstrates the DistricYs ability to implemeM tfiis Plan. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act, this Plan will be updated annuatly with changes in the impact fee schedules adjusted accordingly Kent School Dishict S�-Year Capital Fecillhas Plan Apol 2014 Page 3 I I Six-Year Enroliment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survivai and student yield from documented residentiai construction projected over the next six years. �s� reeie z� The student generation factor is the basis for the growth projec6ons ftom new developments. �s�a�s� King County live births and the DistrieYs relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system. tsae Ten�� 8.67% of 25,057 King Counry live births in 2009 is projected for 2,172 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2014 This is an decrease of 165 live births in King County over the previous year �s�rearez� Fuil Qay Kindergarten ("FDK") pragrams at all 28 elementary schools require an adjustment to the Kindergarten forecast for projeeting FDIC at 1.0 FTE for capital facilities planning. P-223 Reports will continue to include FDK students at 1.0 for twelve schools with FDK funded by state apportionment, and all other kindergarten students will be reported at .5Q FTE for state funding in 2013-2014 Early Chitdhood Education stuiients (also identified as "ECE'}, "Preschool Inclusive Education ("IE") students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Specia! Education Enrollment. Capaciiy is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 7 - 8% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District from private kindergartens. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year Projections for October 1, 2014-2019 are from OSPI Report 1049 — Determination of Projected Enrollments. Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will cantinue to track new develapment activity to determine ir»pact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdiations wifl be considered in the DistricYs future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eiglit permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Cavington, Reriton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley rconsnuea) Kent School District Sbc-Year Cap'�tal Fadlities Plan Aprii 2014 Page 4 1 I Six -Year Enroliment Projection �c«m„� STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last five years. Following these guidelines, the sfudent generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary 484 Middle School 129 Senior High .249 Total 862 Multi-Famiiy Elementary .324 IVliddle School .Q66 Senior High .118 Total .508 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,163 single family dwelling units and 1,478 multi-faniily dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. Please refer to Appendix E on Page 36 of the Capita{ FacilRies Plart for details of the Student Generation Factor survey The actual nurriber of stude�ts in those residential developments was determined using the District's Education Logistics (EDULOG) Transportation System v�ihich provides a count of enrolted students in identifiable new development areas. KeM School Distrid Sa-Year Capital Faalities Plan April 2014 Page 5 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Mo. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251 H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY l�.B=LNe Bl�ihs LB n 1999 LB M zOW LB In 2001 l6ln 2002 LB M 20W LB in�4 LB in 20p3 IB N 2006 LB In 2d17 LB in 2DOB October HC Enrdlment 2004 2005 2008 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2073 Idnp Caunry Ltve BatDs� 22.p07 22.487 21.778 21.883 22,431 22,874 22.880 24,244 24,899 25,712 Incresse/Oecrease -205 480 -709 85 5B8 443 794 1,564 855 323 Kindatparten I Blrlh%' 8.34% 8.41% 8.23°k 8:30°k 8.4796 8.33% 8.13% 8.18% 8.57°/a 8.40% Klndergarten 1836 1992 t793 1b75 1901 1905 1845 1983 2134 2119 Gr2de 1 1,958 1939 2009 1878 1923 196t 1996 1888 2017 2186 Grade 2 1,937 1985 2001 2051 1918 �966 is42 2016 1905 2055 Grade 3 2,023 1967 2031 2036 2087 1977 2002 1983 2062 1922 Orede 4 2,059 2031 2017 2052 2066 2052 7956 2024 2000 2087 Grade 5 2,709 2097 2057 2023 2050 2091 2086 1974 2044 2008 Gf2dB 6 2,145 2173 2708 F705 2062 2075 2135 2135 2028 2079 Grade 7 �uam,su„a 2,z47 2206 22oe 2198 2122 21t7 2095 2105 2739 2048 Gf2de 8 " " 2,225 2297 2267 2185 2148 2173 2153 2111 2138 2121 Grade 9-SenlorHiph 2,709 2774 2782 2564 2579 2472 2440 2471 2455 2483 G�ade 10 2.131 2179 2218 2481 2248 2217 2238 2272 2092 2046 Grede 11 1;974 te�o 1962 1962 2059 2046 2048 799b 1933 1873 Grdde 12 1,538 1560 1555 5576 t648 1712 1894 1858 1646 1538 7otal EnrollmerA' 28,891 28,970 28,996 26,882 28,831 26,764 28,630 26,815 26,811 26.563 Yearly Headcourrt Irxaeaea/Detrease M2 79 26 -134 -31 -87 -134 -15 -4 -0B Cumutstive lncrease M2 527 547 413 382 315 181 766 162 714 7 Thls number hMicales aclual births In IQng County 5 yea/s prbr to enrolhnent year es uplated by WaeM1i�gton State DeparhneM M H�Ith.CeMer for Health Statlsfics.KeM School Dislrki percenlaBe beeed an edual qrMeigerten eruolM�ent 5 years Wter. 2 Enrollment repmteU to Ne s(ale on form P-223 generates baek educelion fuMing a�exGudes Earty ChiltltrooU Edueation ("ECE"8'B2"a Birth to 2 Preschool Indusive Educetion)erW college-ony Running Start stude�s. Kent School DlsWct Six-V�r Capflel FacJlUes Plen Teble 1 Ap�ll 2014 Page 8 ICENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day KifWB�g9nen et all Elam LB in 2�8 I.B in 2008 LB in 20�o LB in 2017 LB In 2Dt2 CB Est 207s LB Est.207� .ACTUAL. P. R O J E C T I. O N October 20'!3 2b14 2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 King County Live BiAhs' 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 25,890 26,490 ' IncreaealDacrease 323 -185 -543 NB 402 858 600 Kindergarten/Birth °h � 8.40% 8.67°k 9.08% 926% 9.33% 923°h 9.23% FD Kindergarten� 1.0 2119 2,172 2,227 2,281 2,336 2;390 2,445 Grade 1 2186 2,179 2,234 2,291 2,346 2,403 2,459 Grade 2 2055 2,208 2,201 2,256 2,314 2,369 2,427 Grade 3 1922 2,101 2,257 2,250 2,306 2,366 2,422 Grade 4 2087 1.920 2,098 2;254 2,247 2,303 2,363 Grade 5 2008 2,108 1,940 2,120 2,277 2,270 2,327 Grade 6 2079 2,048 2,15d 1,979 2,162 2,323 2;315 Grade 7 2046 2,088 2,057 2,160 1,988 2,172 2,333 Grade 8 2121 2,069 2,111 2,080 2,184 2,010 2,196 Grade 9 2483 2,438 2,378 2,426 2,391 2,510 2,310 Grade 10 2046 2,175 2,134 2,081 2,123 2,093 2,197 Grede 11 1873 1,830 1,945 1,908 1,861 1,898 1,872 Grade 12 1538 _ 1,532 1,497 1,591 1,561 _ 1,522. _ . 1,553 Totai Enrolimerrt Projection' 26,563 26,868 27,229 27,677 28,096 28,629 29,219 Yearlyln9rease/Decrease 3 305 sev aas atia �a 5eo Yearly lncreaSBlDeaea58% 1.15% 1.34% 1.65% 1.51% 1.90% 2.O6Yo TotaLEnrollment Pro'ection 28,563 26 868 27,229 27,677 28,086 28,629 29,219 � Kindergarten enrollment prvJection ta 201415 basetl on Kent SD percantage of iive births in Kirre CourRy Me years previous. 2 Kindergarten projecNon is calculated by using the Distrid's previous year perwMage M King Courtty births five years eaAier canpared to actual kindergarten enrollment in ihe previous year.(Exdudea ECE-EaAy Guldhocd Educedon prasd+oolers) ' Headcount ProjacGons tor 2014-2018 from OSPI Report 1049-DetertninaCmn of Pro)ected Enrollmerrts 4 OcL 2013 P223 HeadcauM is 28,583&FTE 25,745.Full HeadwuM with ECE Preschool&Running Start etudents=27,945. G R O W T H P R O J E C T I 0 N S - Ad'ustments for ouRent economic factors For facilities planning purposes, this six-year enroilment projection anticipates conservative enrollment growth from new development CURently in some phase of planning or consiruction in the district Kent School DisMct S�c-Vear Capifai Pacilides Plan Table 2 nPm zo�a a�a � III Current Kent School District °°Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overafl capadty The standard of service identifies the program year, the c.lass size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, arid other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School Disfrict. The District has identified schools with sign�cant special needs programs as "impact" schools and the standard of service targets a lower class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standaM of service as the permanent facilities. (see append�x a, e a c) The standard of service defined herein wil! continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of seroice and future changes wil! be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Current Standards of Service foc Elementary Students Class size for Kindergarten is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 1 - 3 is planned for an average of 23 or fewer students. Class size for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 or fewer students. Class size for Kindergarten and grade 1, for schools that qualify for high poverty funding (18 elementary schoo�s for 2014-15) is planned for an average of 20 or fewer students. All elementary schools meet the criteria required to provide full day kindergarten programs (FDK = Full Day Kindergarten) with the second haff of the day funded by state apportionment or the Educational Programs and Operatio�s Levy I Twelve schools with FQK Programs have state apportionment funding. � Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some af the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to senre these programs. Some s#udents have schedufed time in a computer lab. Students may also be providad music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility KeM School D(strict Siz-Year Capftaf Facilities Plan Apd! 2014 Page 8 Some identified students will aiso be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as foflows: English Language Leamers (E L L) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I} — Federal Program Leaming Assisted Programs (LAP) — State Program Highly Capable Students-State Program Reading, Math or Science Labs inciusive Education Service for Elementary and 5econdary students with disabifities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 1�-15 depending on the program: Early Childhood Education {ECE) -3-4 yr old students with disabilities Tiered Intervention in Inc{usive Education Support Center Programs Integrated Programs & Resource Rooms (for speciat remedial assis#ance) Self-contained Inclusive Educafion Support Center Frograms (SC) Schoal Adjustmen# Programs for students with behavioral disorders (SA) Adaptive Support Center for Mild, Moderate & Severe Disabilities(ASC-oD) Speech & Language Therapy & Programs fo� Hearing Impaired students Occupational & Physical Therapy Programs (OT/P� The Outreach Program (TOP) for 18-21 year old secondary students Some newer buildings have been constructed to accommodate most of these programs; some older buildings have been mod�ed, and in some circumstances, these modifications reduce the classroom capacity of the buildings. VVtien programs change, program capacity is updated to reflect the change in program and capacity Current Standarcis o#Service for Secondarv Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings. Class size for grades 7 —8 is planned for an average 6f 28 or fewer studerits. Class size for grades 9- 12 is planned for an average of 30 or fewer students. Similar to Incfusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings. Kent School District Siu-Year Capitel FacAitles Plan AprN 2014 Pa9e 9 Iderrtfied secondary students wiil also be provided other educational opportunities in classrooms for programs designated as follows: Computer, Multi-Media &Technology Labs 8 Programs Techno{ogy Academy at Kent-Meridian High School & Milf Creek Middle School Science Programs & Labs — Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Oceanography, Astronomy, Meteorology, Marine Biotogy, General Science, etc. English Language Leamers (E L l) Music Programs— Band, Orchestra, Chorus, Jazz Band, etc. Art Programs—Painting, Design, Drawing, Ceramics, Pottery, Photography, etc. Theater Arts—Drama, Stage Tech, etc. Joumalism and Yearbook Classes Highly Capabie (Honors or Gifted) and Advanced Placement Programs Intemationai Baccalaureate (°I B") Program JROTC -Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps Career&T�hnical Education Programs (CTE-Vocational Education) Family 8 Consumer Saertce—Cufinary Arts, Sewing, Careers w/Children/Educ., etc. Child Development Preschool and Daycare Programs Health& Human Services—Sports Medicine, Sign Language, Cosmetology, eYc. Business EduCation — Word Processing, Accounting, Business law 8� Math, Marketing, Economics,Web Design, DECA, F6LA(Future Business Leaders). Technicai & Industry — Woodworking, Cabinet Making, Buiiding Trades, Metals, Automotive 8 Manufacturing Technology, Weiding, DraRing, Drawing, CAD (Computer-aided Design), Efectronics, Engineering& Design,Aviation,ASL, etc. Graphic & Commercial Arts, Media, Photography, Theater & Stage, Ag 8 Horticuliure. Kent Phoenix Academy — Performance Leaming Center, Gateway, Virtual High School 8� Kent Success program with evening dasses for credit retrieval Space or Classroom Utilization As a resuft of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a wbrk space during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85°� for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. Kent School Distrid Six-Year Caplpl FacilR3es Plan Aprll 2014 Page 10 I V Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools CurrenNy, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,475 students and transitional (portable) capaciiy to house 1,143. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section T I I. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the DisficYs schoots by type, address and current capacity (see rad�s 3 on Page �2). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capaciiy is 96%-4%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Pfan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2013. For the 2014-15 school year and beyond the state has mandated lower class sizes in 18 elemerrtary schools that are cfassifted as high poverty The new class size in grades K-1 will be 20 students for every teacher This is a reduction of 3 students per dass from the district's current standard of service. The overall effect for those schaols is to reduce capacdy districtwide by 342 studen#s (ses Table 3A on Page 92A). Calculation of Elemerrtary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B and C. The calculation for Elementary School capacity for 2014-15 is shown in Appendix A-1 A map of existing schools is included on Page 13. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Kent Mountain View Academy serves Grades 3 — 12 with transftion, choice and home school assistance programs. It is located in the former Grendview Schooi in the westem part of the district in Des Moines. This school was originally designed as an elementary school and is included in the etemerrtary capacity for this Plan. Kent Phoenix Academy is a non-traditional high school which opened in Fall 2007 in the renovated site and building that formeriy seroed Sequoia Middle School. Kent Phoenix Academy has four specia.l programs including the Performance Leaming Center, Gateway, Yrtual High School and Kent Success. iGrad - In parfiership with Green River Community College, Kent Schoal District has pioneered the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or °iGrad" iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma, iGrad is not included in this Capital Facili�es Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Flill Plaza Shopping Center Over the past two years, enrollmerrt in the iGrad program has averaged over 400 students. KeM School Distric[Sa-Year Capital Faalities Plan Apdt 2014 Page 11 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 20'13-14 Year SCHOOL openea p,BR ADDRESS Progrem - — -- - .__..- -- -- Ca ac' Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 16235-140M Avenue SE, RenOon 98058 452 CeOer VaAey Elemarrtary 1871 CV 26500 Timberlene Way SE, Covington 98042 360 CovingWn�ementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wax Roed, Covington 98042 504 Cresrirood Elernentary 1980 CVJ 25225-180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 432 East Hill ElemeMary 1953 EH 9825 S 2401h SUeet, KeM 98031 4gp Emerald Patk 1999 EP t t B00 SE 216th SUeel, Kent 98031 504 Fainvood ElemeMary 1969 FW t6600-748th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 408 George T.Darriel Elementary 1992 DE t 1310 SE 248M Street, Kert 98030 456 Glenridge ElemeMary 1998 GR 194D5-120th Avenue 5E,Rerrton 98058 458 Grasa Lake dementary 1971 GL 28700-191st Place SE. KerR 96042 452 Horizon EJementary 1990 HE 27641-144M Avernm SE, KeM 98042 504 Jenkins Cr�c Elementary 1987 JC 26915-1 B6th Avenue SE, Covfngtun 98042 404 Kenl Elementary 1999 KE 24700-64Th Avenue South, Ifent 98032 480 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Rvenue SE, KeM 98042 510 Mertln Sortun Eiemerrtary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 480 Meadow Ridge Elementery 1994 MR 27710-106th Avenue SE,KerR 98030 476 Merldian Elemenfary 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kerrt 98D42 524 Millennfum EfemeMary 2U00 ML 11919 SE 270ih Street, Kent 98030 504 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 SoWh 236th Slreet, Kerrt 98032 480 PaMher Wke Elementary 2009 PL 20831-108fh Avenue SE, Kerrt 96031 524 Park Orchard�ementary 1963 PO 11 U10 SE 232rM Street, ICeM 98031 486 Pine 72e Elemerrtary 1867 PT 27825-1181h Avenue SE, Kent 98030 514 Ridgewoud Elemerrtary 1987 RW 18030-162�d Place SE, ReMon 98058 504 Sawyer Wootls Elementary 1994 SW 31135-228th Ave SE,Bladc DiamorW 98010 504 Scenic Hi0 Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, KeM 9803U 476 Soos Creek ElemeMary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218Ih Place, Kenl 98031 380 Springbrook Elemerrtary 1969 SB 20035-700th Avenue SE, Kerrt 98031 418 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300-132rM Avenue SE, Kent 98042 504 Elementary TOTAL 13,206 Cedar HeigMs hLddle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street,Covington 98042 885 Mattson N6ddle School 1961 MA 16400 SE 251 st Street, Covington 98042 T8T Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Suaet, Rerrton 98058 832 Meridian Mkidle School 1958 MM 23480-120tli Avenue SE, Kent 98031 78S Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North CeMrel Avenue, KeM 98032 816 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 1841h SVeet Renton 98058 926 Middie School TOTAL 5,146 Kent-Meridian High Scbool 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th SVeet, Kent 9803D 1,904 Kentlake Senior H3gh School 1987 KL 21401 SE 300th Sheet,KeM 88042 7,g57 Kentridge Senior High Sdiool 1968 KR 12430 SE 206th Sheet, Kerrt g8031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High Sdiool t 981 KW 25800-164th Avenue SE, Cwington 98042 2,759 Sanior High TOTAL g�yy� Kent Mourrtain�ewAcademy 1997 NIVlLC 22420 MilRary Roatl, Des Moinas 98198 410 Kent Phoena Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, KeM 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27 475 KeM School Dfshict S&-Year CapHal Fadlrties Plan Table 3 nP��i zoia Pege �z f�NT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2014-2015 Year SCHOOL opened qBR ADDRESS Program Ca Carriege Creat Elemerrtery 1990 CC 7 8235-140th Avenue SE, Rerrton 98058 456 Ceder Valley�ementary 7 871 CV 26500 Timbarlane Way SE, CoWngton 98042 364 Covingfon Elementary 1961 CO 17070 SE Wak Roed, Covington 98042 488 CresN+oad Elementa�y 1980 CVJ 25225-1 BOth Avenue SE, Covington 98D42 432 Eest Hill 9emertlery 7953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, KeiG 980.31 466 EmereW Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Straet, Kent 96031 484 Fafr�wod Elamerrtery 1969 FW 16600-146th Avenue SE, Rerrton 96058 408 Gaorge T.Daniel Elertiar�tary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 428 Glenridge ElemeMary 1998 GR 19405-120th Avenue SE.,ReMon 98058 438 G2ss Lake�ementary 197� GL 28700-'191 st Place SE, Kerrt 98042 438 Horizon EkmeMary 1990 HE 27B41-144M Avenue SE, KeM 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elemerdery 1987 JC 26915-186th Aven�SE, Covington 98042_ _ 459_ . Kerrt Elementery 7999 KE 24700-64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 460 Lake Yowga ElemeMary 1965 LY 19660-142nd Avenue SE, Kerrt 98042 510 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 2481h Sbeet, Kent 98030 452 Meadow Rldge Eiemernary 1994 MR 2771�-108fh Aven�SE,Kent 98030 440 Meridtan FJamentary� 1939 ME 25621-140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 524 Milennfum demerMsry Z000 ML tt919 SE 270th Street, Kent 96030 484 Neey-O'Brien EMmerkery 1990 NO 6300 South 2361h Street Kent 98032 460 PaMher Lake Elemantary 2D09 PL 20631-1 OBth Avenue SE, Kent 98031 504 Perk Orcharcf Elementary 1963 � PO 11U10 SE�232�Street,�Kerit 88031 476 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825-118th Avenue SE, Kerrt 96030 477 Ridgewood Elertie�rtary 1987 RW 18030-762nd Plece SE, ReMon 980� 504 SeHyer Woods EkmeMery 1994 SW 31135-228th Ava SE.Bladc Diemond 98010 486 Scenic Hfll Elementery 1960 SH 2602b Woodland Way SoWh, KeM 98030 448 Soos Creek Elemefrtary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 342 Springbrook Elementery 1969 SB 2DD35-100th Avenue SE, Kerrt 98031 41 B Sunrise Elementary 9992 SR 22300-132nd Aven�SE, Kent 98D42 543 ElemeMary TOTAL 1$864 Cedar Heights M�dle Sdiool 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 SVeet,Covington 98042 88B Mattson Mkldie Sdiool t 981 MA 16a00 SE 251 at Street, Ccvington 98042 787 Meeker Middle�hoM 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Streat, ReMon 98058 832 Meridian Middle Sdrool 7958 MM 23480-720th Avenue SE, Kerd 98031 782 Mill Creek Middie School 2005 MC 620 NOM CeMrat Av�iue, KeM 96032 876 Northwood Middle Sdwot 7996 NW 17p07 SE 184ih Street, ReMon 96058 826 Middle School TOTAL 5,146 Kent�AeriCian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256ih Street, Kerrt 98030 7,804 Kenllake Senior Fi�h Schod 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th StreM,Kent 98042 1,867 KeMridge Sersor High School 1968 16i 12430 SE 2081h Street, Kent 98031 2,277 KeMwaod Senia�gh SchoW 1981 KW 25800-764Ui Avenue SE, Covington 98,042 2,759 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain V'�ew Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Mllitary Road, Des Moines 96198 410 K�t Phoena Awdemy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kerrt 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,133 Kent Sdw_ol Distriet Six-Yeer Capitel Fadlitles Plan Table 3-A ar�� zo�a Page 72-A � Nd '�' /� � HBmBn qry � s � l'v � � �e�� Scho�l Dist�ec� �oa 415 � SEPetro��sk Rldgewood Lake W E�m�ry , °a�e Serving r�sidents of � � ca�nage c.esr � ; E �„��,, . o l9nincoeporated King Coun4y < r� b�S�� CiPy oi Kent � � GlenHtlge 0 MM��g �ke ' CI4y o4 Renton � stpdngbrook e�emantarv ovoun s �_ �': Ciry of Auburn lementary Element ��`e! •., T ° KB^TM� Ci4y of Sea Tac d H�Scnoo� '. �,;.t.,• '� = ° � 5�2°°'"S' -' ,�kB CIty of Covington � 52721hSt m pcntherloke 6neraldPark �'°�` Vou�e pn � T Elemenotury E 0^fary F � e C9}�/ O� 'v1�1p�e VQ'�� ' a �c�ko City of Black Dlamond � Elemeniary OSumiae ElemeMary 0 Kenf �) Park Orehcad Mounfain Vfew � b^ Eiert�eniary AcademY a.� 0 MerkBan Neety O'&ien .�?' �Middle School T Eleme�lrnY p .t? East H01 y SL 2q01h Sf �' Elemen SE 240 S m � '� lemeniory MN Creek 0 Danlel a oi d{, �+s� p e SChool p ElemenMry Q � MaMwn r'� � 4, Middle 9e �� 0 o,�es�ct SMo�hin� ^� v�� Cresfwoo � K H gh Schoo� Elamanbry SE 2561h Et �^ 0 Elem tory G � y 0 0 Ma�ldlan OKeniwood' Pipe Lake c a Scenio Hm p j A�lenrehcrt�°n -�\Hementary High School Ce�e�n�ry Q Elemenfary '�c K�t Ptro M \\ � o ACademY \ �MereWlan �reekp � CedarHelghfa �J 0 �J Elemq�q �Mlddle Sch 1 SE 272nU St ^ MiOernlum �g Y.en6Kcngley Road Q Elemen NorizonO o�1 �Covinalon Meptlow Rldge � Elementary �.s� Elemanlary Elemeniary Plne hee N .N9 Grau Lake Elementory Q � 0 Elemeniary � � �� SEG��in9��n-So�vYork a. � d Wke •p 8mvyer �� Inke KentWkeA Hlgh Sc�ool 9 28 Elementary Schools a �""'°" , 0 6MIddleSchools � s�ve�w�a.� p 4 Senlor Hlgh Schools ElemeniCry Kent Mountain View Academy (Grades.3-12) � Kent Phoenix Academy (9-12) m m m w V Six-Year Pianning and Construction Plan At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring of 2014, the following projects to increase capaaty are in the planning phase in Kent School Disfict: . The D�strict received authorization from the Office of Superintendent af Public Instruction to temporarily reopen the former Kent Elementary school at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent.This facility wiil be used to house the kindergarten and early child educaGon(ECE) classes for both Kent and Neely-0'Brien Elementery W alleviate overcrowding at those schools.This building will re-open in fa112014 as the Kent Valley Early Learning Center This disfict wili fvnd this project without the use of impact fees. o Planning is in progress for a replacement school for Covington ElemenYary School in 2016 or heyond. The project is pending satistactory financial resources to fund the projecf. o Pianning is in progress for additionai classroom space for Neely-0'Brien Elemerdary School.This addition will add approximatety 25°h to buiiding capacity and is expected to come oniine in fall of 2017 pending satlsfactory financial resources to fund the project • Enrollment projections neflect future need for additional capacity at the eiementary school level. Future facility and site needs are reflected in this Plan. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity As a critica) componetrt of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions fo� all studerrts when reviewing appliqtions and design plans for new roads and developmeMs. This should inGude sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as weti as bus pull-outs and tum-arounds for school buses. Included in this Pian is an inventory of potential projects and sites iderrt�ed tiy the District which are potentially acceptable sRe altematives in the future. �see 7able a on Page 15&Site map a�Page 18) Voter approved bond issues have inctuded funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sftes acquired to date are inGuded in this Piart. Some funding is secured for purcfiase of additional sftes but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not ay undeveloped p�operties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sotd to meet future facility needs. 2Q06 voter approval of $106M bond issue for capital improvement inctuded the construction funding for a new elemerrtary school, replacement of Partther Lake Elementary, and classroom additions to high schools. Some impad fees have been utilized for those projects. In March 2013 the Board of Directors reallocated the funding for the new elemerrtary school to capitat projeds for safety and security The Board wiI! continue annuai review of standard of service and those decisions will be reflected in the each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. Kent School DisUid&tx-Year Cepltal Facilities Poan April 2014 Page 14 F�NT SCHOOI DISTRlCT No.415 SKe Acquisitlons and ProJecta Planned to Provfde Additionai Capacity Projecied Projeded %Tor SCHOOL ! FACILIIY / SITE IOCATION T Status Comp�etion progrsm new � - -�- �ate Capadty GmNh #,on ��m� �� M� ELEMENTARY Elemertlary Kerrt Valley EaAy Leaming Cerrter-Addtdun 3'17 Fouth Ava.5 Avenue S,Kent ACCPoon In Process 207415 270 100% 14 Classroomc ad0ed to provide New Capadry lGndergarten Students from Pkely O'Brien Funded inr T70 sWderrts. and Ke'rt ElemeMary-No Impact Fees Replacemerrt 6 Replacemerrt for Covirgton ElemeMary (U) SE 256Yh Street&154th Ave SE ElemeMery PlannMg 2016-17 600 16% CoWnglon Elem- Capadty to ba replaced 17U70 SE Wax Road, Covington demerrtary Utiiizetl -504 Elemerrtary Neely-0'Brien demeMary School-Addition(ln 6300 S 236th Street,KeM 98032 Addkion Plennirg 2017-18 600 25% Classrooms adtled to provitle New Capadty QirteM CapaUry 480+�Zp New=600 PlenNng MIDDLE SCHOOL 8 SENIOR HIGH No new projeds required for Sec:ondary Schools at this time&Secondary Schools are eaccluded from Impact Pee formula. TEMPORARY FACIt.IT1E3 Atlditlonal ��Y Portables' TBD-Fw placemerrt as rreeded New Planning 2013+ u-si eacn 100% #°� ° OTHER SITES AC�UIRED �ena uce �antl use � �m� T e Jurisdiction 4 Covington area NOM (Near Mettson PAS) SE 251 8 184 SE, Covington 98042 Urban EfemeMary Gty of CovirigMn 7 Covinpton area South (Scerselia) SE 290 8166 SE, Kerd 98042 Rurel ElameMery King CpuMy S Covinptan area West (Halleson-Wikstrom) SE 256&154 SE, Co�rington 88042 Urban ElemenWry City of CoWnpton 3 tlam Lake area (Pollard) 76620 SE 240, KaM 88042 Rura1 �IemeMary png Cqu�ty 8 SE of Leke Morton area (West property) SE 332 8 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rurai Secondary King CouMy 2 Shady Lk area(Sowere,BIaUre,Drahota,Paroltrre) 17428 SE 182 Street, ReMon 88058 Urban ElemeMary King County 1 So.King Co.AcNviry CeMer(Pormer Nike slte) SE 167 8170 SE, Renton 98058 Rura1 TBD Z w�8�p��y 72 Sou[h Central site (Plemmons-Yeh-Wms) SE 286th St 8 124th Ave SE,AuDum 98092 Ufban TBO� p�g�p�y Notes: ' Unfunded faGlity neeOs will be reviewed In the hrture. Z TBD-To be determined-Srnne sites are iderttified biR piacement,Oming and/or configura5on of porfables has rrot been detertninetl. 'Numbers cortespond to sites on Site Bank Map on Pege 18.OUrer Map ske locatlons are parcels idaMified in Tabk 7 on Page 28. Kent Schaol Distrid Six-Year Capital Fatllities Plan Table 4 April 2074 Page 15 �' � � � O � � ;� �� e� � � Sw_ � � �� 0 � � � � 9 � � � � � s h g �� t � � � �� s . � �� ► � � � °� �� Y$ n O� s �l�E P� � �✓ �r �/J �'u YO W �� `�X �� , �� °W �a _ �� R y � 3sa�vwvc� -- nw 9 � � °� � �� *�� LL�� y � � �� ase,�vwovt m� �t �� $ � � �� >^vw+zst �� , � � as��o�zsi � t� �� 3 � �� _ �� g z � �E �� rrAA��o ppm� � �'� �� N 2� �a� _ p � 35BM4F80� 6I � m� � � Y 3 � �� {�g 35�V4iVOL �� WP� �Yc � 8a ��y� �� U � � � m� � � y fp� �V N:1We� g � a w � }y' � 99[y�}� �� ° o� � E � �€ � � � � om ��Y K�``. n a,o,�,a,� Karrt SchoW Dlstrlct Six.Yaar Capiial Facilides Plan Apri12014 Qa6e18 V I Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portable as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations. (Piease see n�e��ces a e c�� Based on enrollment projections, implementation of iv:l day kindergarten programs, program capacity and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portabtes during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District dces not anticipate that all of the DistricYs portatrles will be replaced tiy permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1 To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the time of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilifies to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currenUy in the District's inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District wiJl use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. Kent School District Six-Year CapRal Facilifies Plan April 2014 Page fl V I I Projected Six-Year Ciassroom Capaci4y As stated in Section N, the program capaciry study is periodically updated fo� changes in special programs and reflects class size fluctuations, gracie level splits, etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3 on Page 12, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts. rsea rearBs s a s a-ac on aeges ts-zz/ Enrollment is electronical_ly reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE {AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrbllment "snapshot in time" to report enrollment for the year Kent School District continues to be the fourth Iargest district in the state of Washington. P-223 Headcount for October 2013 was 26,563 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECE and college-only Running Start students. A full headc6unt of all students enrolled in October 2013 tbtals 27,942 which includes ECE and college-only Running StaR students. In October there were 760 students in 11'" and 12�' grade participating in the Runnirtg Start program at 10-21 different colleges and receiving credits foward both high school and college graduation. 392 of these students attended classes only at the colfege ("college-only") and are excluded frbm FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the Highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of servics, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements thrbugh the transifional use of portables. �sea rawa s a�a r�s s a-s-c oR P�s,e-zz� This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There iriay be a need for addifional portables and/or new sohools to accommodate growth within the District New schools may be designed to accommodate placemerrt of future portables.School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of relocatables, zoning changes, market candifions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of faciJities in difFerent parts of the District. Kent School Distri�3 Six-Year Capital FaGlitiea Plan AprEl 2014 Page 18 4CENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY To�A� DIS�R'CT SCHOOL YEAR zo�a-�a 2o�a�s' 201578 zo�e-n zo��-�e zo�e-is zo��2o nctue� P R 0 J E C T E D PermaneM Program Capacity ' 27,475 27,133 27,403 27,403 27,499 27,619 27,819 Changes to Permarient Capaciry ' Kent Valley Eerty Leaming CeMer? 270 Capacity Increase(� Replecemerrt schaol wkh projected increase In eapacity Covington Elementary Repiacement (u) 3 600 7o Reqece curtent Covington Elemer�tery capaaty -504 Neely-O'Brien Elemenffiry Addition-Capacity increase (u) ' 120 Permenent Propram Cepaeity SubWfel y�,475 27,403 27,403 27,499 27,619 27,618 27,818 Interim Portable Capadty 5 ea�+,emaryaonaaece�aiyReyWrea 836 1,200 1,584 1,800 2,232 2,670 3,000 r,name saroa aarsaa c�rny R�rea � 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 swiwr Hqn scnaoi porteme cepacny aeqW�a � 0 D 0 0 D 0 0 936 1,200 1,584 1,800 2,232 2,670 3,000 TQTAL CAPACITY ' 28,411 28,603 28,987 29,299 29,851 30,289 30,619 TOTq�ENROLunENT/pttOJECTION° 26,588 26 868 27,229 27,677 28 096 28,629 29,219 DISTRICTAVAILABLECAPACITY� ��8q,y 1,735 9,758 1,622 1,755 1,660 1,400 � Capaary is based on standard of service for programa pravided and is updated periodicaNy to reflect program charges. 2 Kent Valley Early Leamirg Center will open in the Toimer Kent ElemaMary School.This Is designed to house Kindergarten and ECE programs at Neely O'Brien and Kent Elemerdaries to ease overcrowding 3 RepWcement school for Covingfon Eementary will inaease capeclty and will be bullt on e diffe2nt existing urban site. ° Addition W Neely-0'Brien Elementary will increase capaciry approxfmatey 25%. 5 201&2014 totel clessroom poRable capecky Is 936.Same additbnaf 2locatables used tor prog2m purposes. e ACWaI October Headcount Enrollment with Projedions from OSPI Report 1049-Detertnination oF Projectetl Enrollments. Enrollment counts and proJecb6ons have bean adjuated for Fulf Day KirWergarten at all Elementary Schools. � School capadty meets conwrtency requirements and no impaG fees are proposed for secondarq schools. e fn 20t415 capaGty wil�decrease by 342 because of change in standand of servlce in gratles K-1 to 20:1 in 18 high poverty schools �,t sG,00i o;s��a s�-v�.caPasi Facuroas P�en Tebie 5 r�i za�a Paga 19 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.415 PROJECTE� ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEIVIEIVTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 201314 201476� 2015-16 201&17 2017-18 201&f9 2019�20 acwei P R O J E C 7 E D Elementa Permanent Capa ' 13,206 13274 13,544 93,544 13,640 13,760 73,760 KerrtMountainVrewAcademy2 410 Changes to ElemeMary CapeGty Kent Valley Eerty Leaming Ce�ter 270 Capacity Increase(� Covington ElemeMary Replacement (u)° 800 v�ix reW�e«u,enc co��mn eieme�n�b s0a Neely-O'Brien Eiementary Addition Capaciiy increase (u>b 120 Subtotal 13,616 13,544 13,544 73,640 13,760 13,780 13,760 Portable Capacity Requir�' � 936 12� 1584 1800 2232 2,670 3,000 TOTAI CAPAC(lY '�Z 14,552 14,744 15,128 15,440 15,992 76,430 - . 16,780 _ Atl'usted Por FULL Da Kinder artaa HeadcounL ENROlLN1ENT(PROJECTION ° 14,456 14,738 . 15,107 15,431 .15,988_. 18,424 16,758 SURPLUS DEFICI CRPACITY 86 8 21 9 4 6. 2 Number oT Portables Repui� 39 50 80 75 93 �11 125 725 Classroom Portables required in 2019-20. Some adaltlonei porteb�ea usetl for progrem purposes. � Capacity ia based on standarcl of sarvica for progrems provided and is updated periadically to reflect progrem changes. Z Ke�t Mourdein U�ew Academy is a apecial program at the fortner Grandview School aerving students in GraOes 3-72. The school building(fomreAy Kent Learning Center&GraMview Elem J was designed as an elementary school. 3 Kent Valley Earty Leaming Cantar reflecta 12 dassroom capadty increese for Kindargarten and ECE programs from Neety O'Brien and Kent Elementaries. ° ReplacemeM achool fw Cwington ElameMary witl inerease capacity arM is plenned for a difiereM e�dstlng urban site. 5 AddRion to Neely-O'Brien Elemeirtary will inaease capacity approximately 25%. e Actual OGo6er Head�urR Enrollment wlth Projections from OSPI Report 7PA8-Determination of Projeded Enrollme�s. Enrollment&Projections reflect FUIL Dey Kindergarten at ALL ElemeMary schools�tA 8 exdude ECE Preschoolers. ' In 2b74-15 capeCity will tlecrease by 342 because of changa in starMaM of service In grades K-7 to?A:1 in 18 high poverty schools. Kent Sehod Distrid Sa-Yeer Capital Faalldes Plan Tabie 6 A n�,ni Zo�4 P�, zo KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY nAIDDLE SCFi00L - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 207314 201415 201516 2018-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 Actual P R O J E C T E D Middle School Permanent Capacity� 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Cha�ges to Middie School Capacity Subtota! 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required ' � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 'a3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT/PROJECTION Z 4,167 4,157 4,168 4,240 4,172 4,182 4,529 SURPLUS(DEFICIT CAPACITY° 981 991 980_ 908 976 966 619 Number af Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Ciassroom Portables required a!middle achoois at this time.Some Portables used for classroom and progrom purposes. � Capaclty ia based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periaiically to reflect pmgram changes. Z Actuai October Headcourit EnroOment with Projec4ions from OSPI Report 1049-Detertnina2ion of Projeded Enrollme�rts. ' Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration-All 9th grade studeMs moved w the high schoois in Fa1120�4. 4 Middle School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are collected for middle schools. Kent School Disfict Sin-Year Capital Faclilties Plen Tabie 5 $ aP�i zo�a Pa9a z� KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Ido. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2o�3ia 2oia�5 2ois�s zo�s-n 2o»-ia 2oaats 2ot�-zo Acwa1 P R O J E _C T _ E D Senior Hi h_Pertnanent Capaci ' 8,71 t 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 I�ciudes Kent PhcertixAcademy Z No Changes to High School Gapacity suhtote� 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8,711 8.711 Portables Capac R uired 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY ' 8,711 8,711 8,711 . 8 711 8,711 6,711 8,711 ENROLLMENT/PROJECT[ON 3 7,940 7,975 7,954 8,008 7,936 8,023 7,932 SURPLUS DEFICI CAPACIN 771 736 757 705 775 688 779 Number of PoAaWes Required o 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Porteb3es required et thia time.Some Portables used for dassroom and program purposes. t Capaaly is based on sfandard of setvice for programs provided and is updated periodicaly ta refted program changes. 2 Kent Phoena Academy opened in Fali 2007 serving grades 9-72 with four speciel programs. 3 Actuai October Enroilment with ProJections from OSPI Report 1049-Determinadon of Projected EnrollmenGs. ` High School capacity meets conourrency r�uirements and no impact fees are collected for high schoofs. Kent Schoof District Shc-Year Capital Fadtilies Plen Table 5 C �,ni zo�a Page z2 V I I I Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District pians to finance improvemer�ts for the years 201415 through 2019-20. The financi�g components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on voter app�ovai of future bond issues, collection of impact fees under the State Grawth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. in February 2006, voters approved a $106 milEion bond issue that included funds for replacemerrt of Panther Lake Elementary 5chool with increased capacity, as weli as construction of a new Elemerrtary School to accommodate growth. The new Panther Lake Elementary School replaced the previous Panther lake Elemeritary in Fall of 2009 The bond issue aiso funded Phase II of the renovation for Mill Creek Middle School and renovation of Sequoia Middle Schoo{for reconfiguration as a non-traditional high school, Kent Phoenix Academy, which opened in September 2007 2006 construction funding also provided for additional classrooms at Kentlake Fligh Schoot and two projects at Kent-Meridian HS. The projects at Kent-Meridian provide addiiionai capacity with several new classrooms and gymnasium space. The projeds at K-M are completed and the new Main Gym added capacity for two more PE classrooms. Some impact fees were utifized for new constniction that increased capacity Originaliy, the district designated $16 miilion of the 2006 bond authorization toward the construction of an additionat elementary schooi, ident�ed as Elementary#31 in previous Plans. Dus to a change in circumstances, the Board of Directors reallocated fhe $16 million for capital projects for safety and security. The District received authorization from the Office of Superintender�t of Pubiic instruction to temporarily use the previous site of Kent Elementary Schoof at 317 Fourth Ave South in Kent. This facility wiil be used to house the kindergarten and early child education (ECE) classes for Kent and Neely O'Brien elementary school to afieviate overcrowding at those schbols. This building will re-open in fa{12014 as the Kent Valley Early Leamig Center This district will fund this project without the use of impact fees. Replacement of Covington Etementary School in 2016-17 or beyond wiil increase capacity of ther current schooi by app�oximately 16%. 5ome impact fees wili be utilized as part of the Finance Plan. A building addition is also planned to provide approximately 25% additional ciassroom capacity at Neely-O'Brien Eleinentary School in 2017-18. Some impact fees wili be utilized as part of the Finance P1an. The Finance Ptan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additionai capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enroltment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the e{ementary (evef and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates Kent Schoot District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan ApriI 2014 Page 23 V I I I Finance Plan of the Capital Fac"ilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For tlie-Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Facilities Department. Please see pages 26-27 for a summary of the cost basis. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Faciliues Plan Apri12014 Page 24 KENT SCHOOL D13TRICT No.415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Sewred Unsewred Impad SCHOOL FACIUTIES 2014 2015 2018 2017 2018 2019 TOTAL Locel 8 Sfete S�ate Z or Loml� Feas 5 EsUmsted Eatlmafed PERMANENT FACILITIES KeM Valtey Early Leaminp Center F E3,700.000 53,100.000 53,100.000 $Q Covinplon Elemerdary Replacement� U E31,840,000 s31,840,000 $28,745,000 56,095,000 AddlNon to Neely-0'Btien Elementary� U ;14,100,000 $74,100,000 510,800,000 b3,500,000 NO Secondary School Pmjects at thW time: � i iEMPORARY FACILI71E5 Additbnal porlables 9'' U $1,695,000 E2,388,400 51.357,722 $2,772,000 E2.828,000 52,240,000 $13,167,122 513,757 122 17 PMadee 18 ponadee 9 pMebles 16 poila6ks 18 poAebbe 10 porte6tas 07HER N/A Totals y1,695,000 $2,388,400 $1,357,722 534,812,000 $16,928,000 $2,240,000 562,197,122 53,100,W0 537,345,000 521,752,122 ' F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTE9: ' Based on estlmates of adual m fulure construGion costs from Fecilities Departmerrt.(See Pege 28 for Cost 8asts Summary) Z The DlsUkt antidpates recaiving soma Stafe Funding Construdion Asslstance(formedy known as"matching funda")for some projecls. ' FeGllty needs eie pendinp review.Some of theae proJects mey be Tunded with impecl feea. 4 Coat of pmtaMes based on curtent cwst a�M adJustetl for infladon tor fidu�e'yeare. S Fees tr�Uvs wlumn a�e based on amount of fees coilectetl to date a�d es6mated fees on hHure units. Kent School District S6c-Vear Capflal FaGllties P1an Tabte 6 April 2014 Pege 25 V I I I Finance Ptan -Cost Basis Summary For impact fee caJculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the next elemenfary school. Etementary School Cost Projected Cost Cost of Panther Lake Elementary $28,700,000 Replacement (Opened in Fa112009) Pro}eeted cost- Covington Eleme�tary $31,840,000 Replacemerrt (Projected to open in 2017) Projected cost of Neely-O'Brien Addition $14,100,000 (Projected to open in 2018) Elementary Cost based on $31,840,000 Covington Elementary Replacement Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within ihe last ten years. Please see Table 7 on page 27 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on pages 29 and 30 include a "District AdjustmenY'to reduce the fees calculated by the impact fee formulas. For the past four years the district has not increased its impact fees and based on current economic conditions, the District has adjusted the impact fees to keep the same rates as those currenUy in place and made no adjustment for increase in the Consumer Price Index. Kent School Disffid Siz-Year Capitel FaciliUes Plan ApNI 2014 Pege 28 KENT SCHOOL .9YRICT �No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Averege of Sifes Purohased or Built on wHhin last 15 Years TYPB$ Vear Open I �on Mep SCho01 1 Site Purchased Lxation Apeage Cost Av cosVacre ToFel Avera Coat/Aae Elementery 13/Uiban Panther Lake Elementary Repla�ment Site zooe 10200 SE 218 st�t 98031 9.40 $4,465,013 $477,129 5 i Urban Elementery Site(Halleson&WiksVom) 2ooa �6a35 se 26s st,Covn�gan seo42 10.00 $1,093,910 $109,391 Elemarnary s�te subtom� 19.40 $5,578,923 $287,573 Elem site a Middle Sdpol Urban NorthW00d Middle SCilool 1996 170W SE 184 St, Rent«i 98o5B 24.42 $655,138 $26,828 t0l Urben Mtii Creek MS(Kent JH)/McMillan St asaemblage 2002 471-432 McMlllan Sl,KeM 98032 1.23 $844,888 $886,863 12/Urben So Central Site-Unincorp KC(Plemmw�s,Yeh,Wms) t998 E ot 124 SE btw 286-288 PI(UKC) 39.38 $1,938,020 $49,188 Miad�e sclwo�S�ta subarel 65.01 $3,436,024 $52,854 MlAOb Sdii Slle Avg. Sertior High at r ur�an K-M High School Addilion�Kents&srin smim) 2on2 a 2aa3 �0002 se 2ss�n street 6.37 $3,310,000 $524,584 se�uor Ht�h Kentlake High School (Komboi Mofis) tas� 21401 SE 300 St,KeM 98042 40.00 $537,534 $13,438 s�Uroan Kentwood Sr Hi Addition (sandnu) �sss 16807 SE 258th SUeet 3.83 $302,117 $78,882 Senia High Site Subtotel 50.14 $4,149,851 $82,761 Sr HI Site Avera nae:ai n,rai snes were omd,a�a a�«ro adov�or ume�orowm aea. Numbe�s to locsdons on SFte Bank 8 sitlans m Page 77. PropeNee �chased br to 1988 �/Rural So.King County Adivity Center(Nike site)purdiased prror to 1988 4!Urban Site-CovingWn aree NOKh (So of Matteon MS) 1984 TWeI Acreage&Cosl Total Averege Coat!Acre 3/Rura� Siae-tiam�ekeeest (Pollard) 1es2 134.55 $13,164,598 $97,842 7!Rurel Sita South of Covingtnn(Scersella) 1983 8/Rural Site SE o(Lake hbAnn area (Wast qoperty) 1993 2/Urben Site-Shady Lake(SoNeis-Blalne-Orehote-Pamlirre) ,1995 9/Urban Old K�t FJementsry replaced arM wrrently leased out. Kent Sclrod DiaMct Slx-YeerCapifal Fealitles Plan Tab�e 7 ApriI2014 Page 27 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Studeirt Generation Factors-Singie Family Student Generation Factors-Muki-Family Elementary (Grades K-6) 0.484 Elementary 0.324 Middle 5chool {Grades 7-8) 0.129 Middle School 0.066 Senior High (Grades 9- 12) 0.249 Senior High 0.11 S Total 0.862 Total 0.608 Projected Increased SWdent Capacity OSPI-Square Footage per Student Elemer�ry 936 Elementary 90 Middle Schoot 0 Middle School 117 Senior High Addition 0 Sen'ror High 130 Special Educatlon 144 Recjuired Site Acreage per Faciiity Elementary (required) 11 Average Site Cost!Acre Middle School (required) 21 Elementary $287,573 Senior High(required) 32 Midd(e School $0 Senior High $0 New Faciiky Construction Cost Elemeirtary' $31,840,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & Cost Middle School $0 Elemerrtary (c� 24 $145,000 Senior High ' $0 Middle School @ 29 $0 �see eose basis on ag.zs Senior High (H 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance Credit c�nr•smreen.m,ti Elementary 70,882 DfsMct FurWing Assistance PerceMage 58.14% Middle School 16,376 Senior High 22,064 Total 4% 109,332 Construction Coat Allocatlon cca.-cossssy,Ft. (EPFective July 2014) $200.40 Permanent Facflity Square Foo4age Elementary pridudesKnnvn� 1,470,543 Middle School 660,904 District Average Assessed Value SeniorHigh 1,110,415 sir�greFamiryResidence $245,8T1 Total 96% 3,241,862 Totai Facllities Square Footage District Average Assessed Value Elerimentary 1,541,435 Multi-Family Residence $87,860 Middle School 667,829 Apar6neMs 70%Condos 30°k Senior High 1,132,478 Total 3,341,743 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,00� CurreM /$t,000 Tax ReEe(1.8842) $1.68 Developer Provtded Sites!Facilkies Value 0 General Obligation Bond Interest Rate Dweiling Units 0 cur,em aomi irrterest Rete 4.04% KeM Schabi Distrkt Siz-Year Capifal FacilRies Plan April 2014 Page28 KENT SCHOOL DISTRIC7 IMPACT FEE CALCUTATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Ske AcquisiHon Cost per Single Fami{y Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Faclliry Cepa ' x SWtlerrt Generation Factor Requiied Site Aveepe Averega Site CosVAae Fadlily CapeGty SWderrt Fecbr A t (Elamentary) 11 $287,5T3 600 D.4$4 $2,551.73 A 2 (Middle Schod) 21 SO 1,065 0.129 $p A 3 (Senlor High) 32 $0 1,000 0249 $0 0.862 A `> $2,551.73 PermaneM Facili4y Construction C�t per Single Famlly Realdence Fortoula: ((Facsiry Cost/FacN Ca )ic St�e�[Factor)x(PermanenUTobl S uare Footage Rstio) Construction Cost Fedlid C�ry SWtleM Fecmr Foohge Ratio B 1 (Elemernary) $31,840,000 B00 0.484 0.96 $24,656.90 B 2 (Middle Schooq $0 900 0.729 0.96 $0 B 3 (Senior High) $0 1,600 9.249 0.96 $p 0.862 B b y24,656.9Q Temporary Facility Cost pe�Single Family Residenca Fortnula: ((Facdtty Cost!faal' Cepacily)x Student Faclor)x emporary!Total re Footage Ratio) Fetlliry Cost Fadlity Capacfly StuiieM Factor FoWega RaUo C 1 (Elemenisry) g145.D00 24 0.484 0.04 $718.97 C 2 (AAiddie Sehool) $0 29 0.129 0.04 $0 C 3 (Senior High) $D 31 Q.249 p.p4 gp fl.862 C K' _$i16.97 �� &tate Funding Assistance CrpolC per Single Famiry Raaldence (formarly"State Metch'� Formula: Area Cost Allowan� x SPt Square Feel per studerrt x Funtlir�Assisqnce^k x Stutlerrt Factor Cw�stuctkn Cos[Muiation SPI SQ.R!5tuEmit Aasisfanca% S[udent FaIXor D t (ElemeMery) $200.40 90 Q.5614 0.484 $5,075.29 D 2 (Middle School) $200.40 117 0 0.129 $D D 3 (Senior High) $200.40 130 0 .Q�?4� $p D `� _ . $5.07529 Tax Credit per SNgle Famfty Residence Aveiage SF Resldential Assessed Value $2a6,871 Cwrent Debt Service Rate!$1,000 $1.68 CurteM Bond Interest Rete 4.pq°,y YearsAmortized {10Years) 10 7C a $3,258.50 Developer ProvFdsd Facility Credit Facal' /Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC b p F�Recap A = Site Acquiaition per SF Residence $2,551.73 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residance $24,656.90 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residexe $116.97 Subtotal $27,325.59 0 = SEete Metch Credk per ResiUence g5,67519 TC=Tax Cred@ per Residence $3,258.50 Subtotal � - $8,333.79 Totai Ur�funded Need $18,991.81 50%Developer Fee Obiigation $8,496 FC=Facility CredN(ff applicebie) 0 rngma nd�us+me�c cs�a��zs ro��u�> tsa,o+o> Net Fee Obllgation per Residence-Single Family $5,4gg Kent School Distria Suc-Year Capital Facilities Plan April 2014 Page 29 I KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT iMPACT FEE CALCUiAT10N for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Slte Aequ(sMion Cost par MuIG-Famlly Realde�te Unk Fortnula ((Acres x C6st r Acre !Factl Ca a x Sludent Garreraffon Fac[or ReqWietl Sita Acreape Averape Stte Coet/Ave Fadlity Cepedry SlutleM Fe�r A 1 (ElemeMary) 17 $287,573 500 0.324 $2,049.82 A2 (MidtlleSchool) 27 $0 1,065 0.068 $0 A 3 (Senbr High) 32 $0 t,� 0,118 $0 0.508 A b sz.oa9.s2_ Pertna�M PacNiry Cmntrurdon C�t per Muld•Famlty Residence Unft Ftirtnula: ((FedCdy Cost 1-Faefi Ca a )x Student Pac{ot�z(Permanerd/Tote15 uare F � s Ratlo ConeLuctian Cost FacNhy Cepadty StutleM FecMr Footege Retlo B 1 (ElemeMary) $31,840,000 600 0.324 0.96 $18,5E15.88 B 2 (MMdle Sctiooq $0 9�0 0.066 0.88 $0 8 3 (Sanior High) $Q 7,600 0.118 O.BB $0 0.5�8 B -0 _.516.505.88 Temporary Facliity Cost per Nultf-Femiy Residecree Unit Formuia: ((Faafdy Cost!Fea Capa )x S[udent Facto�x em orary I Total Square Fookage Raflo - � FatllLLy Coat Fedlity CapaUty SWdent Factor Foo(ege Retio C 1 (Elamenfar» $145,000 24 0.324 0.04 578.30 C 2 {Mitldle School) $0 28 0.066 O.Q4 $0 C 3 (Senior FFigh) SO 31 0.118 0.04 $0 0.598 C `� $78.30 State Funaing Assisfance Cradtt pe�Nu1H-Family Residance (fortnery"Stale Match"j Pormufa: Area Cost AAowatxe x.SPI uare Feet r sNtlent x fundf Assiatanw% x Student Fador_ AreaCoetANoa+er�ce SPISq.FtlSWtleM Eqwiizetion% SWdentFecPor D 1 (Elamarrtar)/) $200.40 90 0.5814 0.324 $3,387.51 �2 (Middle Schooq $200.40 117 0 O.D88 $0 D3 (SenlorNigh) $200.40 130 0 0.118 $0 D `> 53.397.51 � Tax Cretltt per Muid-Famfly Resldence Unit Averege MF ResldeMtal Assessed Value 587,880 CurreM Debt Servk:e Rate/$1,000 $1.68 Current Bond IMerest Rate 4.04% Yesrs Amortized (10 Years) 10 TC a $1.16a.66 Devebper Provitled Fadlity Credit Faclllry/Sfte Value Dwelfing Units 0 0 FC b 0 Fee Recap A = Sfta ACquisitfon per Muld-Famlry Unit $2,049.82 B � Permanent Facitity Cost per MF UNt $18.505.86 C = Temporary Fadifly Cost per MF UnR $78.30 SuMotal $18,633.98 0 = Stabe Match Credlt per MF UMt $3.397.5'I TC a Tax Credit per MF Unk $t,t 64.66 Subtolal - $4,582.17 Fotal UnNrided Need $14,071.81 50%r Developer Fee Obligation $7,036 FC=Fadtlty Credit Qf appBcable) 0 �iskict Atljushnent (5en Pape z5 tar mylenetion) (i3,658) NM Fee Obligation per Resldential Unit-Muldfiamity $3 378 Kent SchoW Distrid Shc-Year CapiNal FaGlities Plan April 2014 Page 30 IX Summary of Changes to April 2014 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Faciiities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annuaily based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary ctianges from the April 2013 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size as well as program changes. Changes in poRables or transitionai capacity refiect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus andlor movement between facflities. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annualiy All Elementary schoois now have Futl Day Ki�dergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously mod�ed to meet the requirements for Fuil Day Kindergarten programs at ail Elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called "state matchi�g funds") for projects in this Plan and tax credft factors are updated annually Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. Based on currerit economic conditions, the District Adjustmerrt resuits in no change to the current impact fees. Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM G�d�YPe FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor �+ o.asa o.aea Single Family(SF) Ms o.�2s o.�zs SH 0249 0.249 Total 0.866 0.862 • � Student Generation Factor Eiem o.32a o.aza Multi-Family (MF) nns o.oes o.oss SH 0.118 0.118 Totai 0.522 0.508 -.UO Sfate Funding Assistartce Ratios c•swse�m,•� 57.89% 5S.1a% Per OSPi Webs�te AI'88 COSt A110w2nCC(Pormer Boeckh Index) $188.55 $200.40 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (A� SF $228,242 $245,871 Puget Sound ESD AV-Average of Condominiums&Apts. MF ses,eoz Sa�,sso Puget 3ound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate/$1000 Si•es S�.ea Per King Co.Assessor Report Generai Obligation Bond interest Rate 3.�a% a.oa�o Bloomber�Bond Buyet Index Impact Fee-Single Famiiy sF SS,ae� Ss,aa6 No Change to Impad Fee � IR1p8Ct F�-MUfU-Famlly MF 53,378 53,378 No Cfiange to Impact Fee Kent School Dietria Siz-Year Capital Faciikies Plen April 2014 Page 37 X Appendixes Appendix A. Calculations of Capacities for Elementary Schools Appendix B: Calculations of Capacities for Middie Schools Appendix C: Calculations of Capacities for Senior High Schools Appendix D: Use of Relocatables Appendix E: Studen#Generation Factor Survey KeM School D�MG Sa-Year Capifaf Fadlibas Plan April 2014 Page 32 KEMT SCHOOL lRICT �No.415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - IMVENTORY oEPORTABLE3 • FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT KSO Numherof SldMiphCap 'SE/IP �Spacial� ]01&id Pmpiam Claseroorn RabceWbin 10/t/2073 10/1/2013 HI ELEMBMARY ABR; Sta w Hph Cep Cepecity Program Roqlem Use Use C8p8CRy P223 FTE 3 P223 HtlCount POV SCHOOt Class�owns ata4ewrepa' CR Ca Capedty� Portables Portables m�.w�w' Enmtmeih Enropment e.c-cE a n=�y ca�nb erowams CeRlepaCreet CC 18 432 5 20 4b2 1 0 0 382.53 427 N Cadu Valley CVfa 1S 380 8 ZO 380 2 0 0 �OB.00 �O6 Y CovingWn CO/a yp 480 6 24 604 1 0 0 142.00 474 Y Crastwaod CW 18 432 4 0 4S2 4 1 24 ae2.34 493 N Eest Hill EH 20 480 6 10 490 3 � 72 674.03 616 Y Eln6reM Perk EP 21 604 2 0 604 2 0 0 45A60 481 Y Fei'wootl FWle 17 408 3 0 408 3 0 0 388.10 434 N 6 T.DaniN Elem DE 78 412 S 14 468 7 1 24 614.00 614 Y 6lenritlge 6R 18 468 4 0 486 2 0 0 453.80 d88 Y Grass leke GLm 18 432 4 20 452 9 0 0 408.50 427 N HOAun ItE 21 SOa 2 0 604 3 0 0 44Z00 �69 Y Jenkln9Craek JC i6 360 p M 4pq 3 1 24 318.�0 348 N Kent Elementery Heten Yp A80 3 0 4H0 Y 4 98 B42tl0 BA2 v LekeYou�ga LVfi 21 504 7 20 570 0 0 0 478.33 S00 N hbNn9o�Wn NIS 78 468 3 2a 480 1 2 48 686.60 616' Y Nleedow R MRIe 17 408 8 88 478 0 6 720 646.00 646 Y Mefidl0n ElemeMery MEtn 21 504 3 20 524 3 2 48 668.50 B12 N AAOlannium Ekme�rtcry YL 20 C80 7 PA 604 0 1 S4 687.00 867 Y NeBly-O'Brien NO 20 /80 8 0 480 7 6 120 788.00 788 Y PaMherLake ) PL 27 904 g 20 624 4 1 24 860.00 660 Y �ParkOrchaM PO 18 {32 7 Sd 488 2 0 0 641.OB &0.1 Y Pim Trea Vfm Y7 Wd 4 70 61d 1 0 0 SI0.03 821 Y RldpaMoOd RWIh 21 Sd4 � 0 504 1 2 48 483.53 527 N SawyerWoods SW 21 504 2 0 Sd4 0 0 0 41322 148 N SCeniC Hill SH 71 408 8 88 478 � 3 72 64200 842 Y SoDe Cnek SC/e 16 360 4 20 980 3 0 0 113.00 348 Y Sprin9brook S8 17 40B 4 10 418 2 0 0 997.00 487 Y Sufplae SRM 27 504 2 D 504 3 0 0 495.53 534 N Kent Mtn.View Aced�em� MV 74 356 9 BO 410 0 0 0 112.a0 112 N EIemBMaryTOTALM 514 19,078 .1211 580 13,81fi 81 37 744 13,92420 74,458 'EJememary clessroom capecily Is besetl on averape of 24:20-22 in K-3 8 28 in Gratles 4-8.Indudes etlluatrnenta fa ciase size reduc0on or spedel{xogrem diarges. 'KerR Schod Dfatrkt SYendard oF SeMce iasmea earre raome for Pu&out prop�ems.Ie.20 Totel=18 SlerMard+1 Computer Lab r i Musii+i Integreted Pmprem dauroom. 3 AN elemeMery achools heve Full Oay IGndergarten-12 FUK pragrame are State-Nntled:FfE repmts IOiM�.5&SF-F�K�1.0-PYL3 Heetlmuirt reporls Kinderyerten�1.0. "Elementary achools heve 700%space WNtretion rate xiM�ro adjuatmeMe tor per4limm use M dessrooms.CwMs excWtle ECE Presclppien&space is reserved Por ECE claseroortis. Kant Sclwd Diatrid Six•Veer Capnal FaNli6es PHn APPEPIDIX A nu�i zoia Page 33 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No.475 3TANDARD of SERVICE - PR06RAM CAPAC(PY • INVENTORY of PORTABLE3 • FTE and HEADCOUPIT ENROCCMENT KSD Numbar� S�dMiphCup 'eEIIP TSpeciel� 2p1M2018 Progrem � Claeeroom aenca�eEie 1017/2013 ' 10/1/2013 HI ELEMEMARY A8R SltlofHqhCAP �O�H P�B� P�8/em UBB U&B � CBpeCily P223,FTE3. 'P223HdC0ufrt POV° SCHOOL Gaesfoome &a4avwWa� CR CepaGlY� Pdfeble8 Portehlee m2l�wqp' Enwtlment� EnroXment a�ECEBnnKpHyGpeW Hapwm Carriege Cfest CC 18 436 5 20 458 1 0 0 782.53 427 N Cadar Valley CWe 16 344 8 20 380 4 0 0 ]OS.00 �09 Y Coviigton CO/e 70 /84 6 24 4B8 1 �0 0 A4f.00 474 Y GeslwoOd CW 1B 432 4 0 45Y 4 1 24 .482.34 493 N EqtHill EH 20 468 6 10 d66 3� ] M 814.03 818 Y Emewid Park EP 21 .184 4 0 IM 2� 0 0 184:80 �91 Y Felrvraod Fwle 17 408 3 0 408 3 0 0 399.10 434 N e T.Danfel Ebm DE 76 � 6 26 428 1 7 34 -614.00 674 Y GNnrttlge OR 19 0.18 1 0 48B 2 0 0 467.60 �86 Y Greae Lake 61�h 78 478 4 20 438 1 0 0 406.50 427 N HarUnn FIE� 27 477 4 0 477 S 0 0 444.U0 469 Y JenkinsCreek JC 15 416 7 44 458 3 1 24 918.00 348 N KartHlemeMary KEhh 20 480 7 0 480 Y 4 88 842.00 84Y Y lekeYounpe LYM 21 501 ) ZO 5f0 0 0 0 476.33 500 N Meftln 3oAun NS 79 428 � 21 t6] 1 2 /8 688.60 616 Y Meatlow Ritl MR/e 77 372 8 66 440 0 8 120 6t6A0 646 V Meridien Elementery MFJh 21 504 3 ZO 524 3 2 48 688.50 812 N NNIIe�Num Eleme�Aary ML 20 480 3 2d �84 0 1 14 887.00 687 Y Nwly.p'&lan NO 20 460 6 0 480 7 6 130 786.00 768 Y Parqha laM New PL 27 484 6 20 604 4 1 ?A 660.00 860 Y PerkO�chBfd PO 1B 422 7 64 478 4 0 0 547.08 849 Y Plna Tree v7m 21 A87 4 10 477 3 0 0 � 6R0.03 527 Y RidpewooA RW/h 21 6W 1 0 504 1 2 48 483.53 527 N r Woods SW 21 A66 2 0 486 0 0 0 � 473.72 448 N 8cenk Hill S1i 77 �BO 8 BB 4a8 4 E 72 ' 842A0 642 Y SoosCreak� SC/a 16 322 4 20 S42 3 0 0 , 325.00 349� Y SpA�gbrook SB 17 A08 4 10 418 2� 0 0 49TAU 497 Y Sunriee �SRlh 21 543 2 0 543 3 0 0 '� 495.53 �534� N KerR Mfn,Vlan AcadBm� AAV 1�1 356 9 60 410 0 0 0 112.00 112 N , Ekmerltary TOTAItQ 544 12.739 120 58U 19.274 81 31 744 . 18.924.2D 14.468 'Ebmantary deseroom rapa�.ity b'6eaed on avaaye N 24:7A-72 in'K-3 8 291n Grades A-6.�I�udas edjUslmenG fM tless aiza reduGion or apecGO prog�in chen9es. �Kent Schod DISMd Standerd d Servke recerves sama�oama for pW4wt progrems.ie,20 Tolel=18 SlaMerd+i Computer Lab+�,dlucic +tilnteprated Proprem daeemom. a N elemmtary achoob hare Ful Oay KxMmgaAen-72 FDK proprame are SlatNuntleO.FTE reporta IGnA�.b 8 SF-FDK�1.D-P223 HeaticWM reporle Idndarperten�7.0. �Ekmenfery echods heve 100%apece utll"uation re�wM rw�uahnmis hx part-tlme use ddesa�ooms.Carrrrb exdude ECE Preschoalen&space ia reserv�for ECE cleaaroans s Elementmy Schods in bokl typa are dasslfieE ea HIBh Povarty erM Wsa ske in p�edes K-t la 20:1 Kenc sciw�. six-raar ceu�Fean�s� APPEPI 4-1 aau 2a+a ae� f�NT SCHOOL ,fWCT No.415 STANDARD of SERVICE - PROGRAM CAPACITY - INVENTORY ot PORTABLES - FTE and HEADCOUNT ENROLLMENT K3D #of •SteMsd sellP BpedalEa 3pec Specrai' 20132014 � Progfam Cleasroom Rebmlabb t011/2013 10/1/2013 MiDDIE ABR S�G C�eci7Y' Eu Prprli Pmgram Pttprem Uce Use Ca�cily P223 FfE° HeaOcount 3 BCFroO� dsrtns et 26=29 Cls Cepea'ty Clerme Ca Capadty' Porqbles Pqlebigs a�2g ea. Enrdlment Enrolp�ent 0 p eax � o-auo� Cetlar He1gMs Mitldle Schooi CH 30 740 8 84 3 71 BBS 2 0 0 827.24 829 MatlsonNFddleSGrool AAA 24 592 8 7B 5 178 7H7 4 0 D B21.B0 822 MeakerMiAdle3chool MK 29 775 8 93 1 24 832 0 0 0 881.00 B81 Meridien Mltltlle School MJ 28 841 5 SB 4 96 792 8 0 0 845.05 &t7 Mill Creek Midtlle School MC 33 813 5 65 2 46 918 0 2 58 858.00 869 NathwoodMk7tlleSchool NW 33 873 2 18 4 95 928 0 0 0 839.82 641 Ke�t Maln}efn ViaxAcedemy(Oredes 3 12) MItldIB SChooi C�retle 7-e EnrdlRlBnt See Ekm 88.00 88 MlAdle Sc11po1 TOTAL 175 4.314 34 382 19 462 6,108 14 2 58 4.181.71 4.187 APPENDIX B KSD Rot smrxlera sei�r eoaorea Spec Spedal' 20132014 Progrem Geaeropn aeqrsmda 10/112013 10NIZot3 SENiOR HIGH ABR St0 Cepar�ry eu. eu Prgm Progrem Pragrem Uae Uee Capedty P223 FTE' Headcount' SCHOOL Cferme at25-31 Cla Cepedb Clsrms Ca Capedry� PortaWes Portablea at3lea. Enrdlment Enrdlmerrt O �esz mesx Ke�l�ridian5eni�Nigh KM SB 7,478 12 167 12 271 1,804 8 3 93 1.992.80 2.072 KenllakeSBnbrHigh KL 68 1,428 73 153 18 381 1,857 2 0 0 1,420.83 1,4% Kenlritlge 3enior High IRi 85 1,713 13 138 18 428 2,277 0 4 124 1,997.80 2,073 KenlWoodSeNofNigh KW BO 1,667 8 102 20 478 2,169 6 4 124 1,840.00 1,811 Kent MDunfaln View Acatlemy(GradBs 3-12) Senbr Hgh Grade 9 12 Enrdlment See Ekm 131.48 136 KeM Phoenix Acedemy PH NorHratlitiaial Hig�School 414 274.80 282 RegionelJusticeC� � RJ WA N/A 200 2 Senbr H' h TOTAI 239 8.193 47 546 BB t.558 8.711 13 71 341 7.859.51 7,940 APPENDIX C F�dudesRunningStart& eary cniarrooa ed sa,aems DISTRIC7 TOTAL ese Y3,583 zo� �,aeo es 2,00e zt,a�s sa• aa �,�a3 zs,�asaz ze,ce�.00 ' ' Sptrlal Program cepadty IrrcJutles dassroome requlAng spedelhed use sud7 es Special Etlucatbn,Career S Technkal Education Pmgreme,Computer Labs,etc Z Secnndery achool cepadfy�adjuafed for 85%uBlhadon fate.FaolNy Use 3tutly was updaled lor progiam dianpea In 201&7a. 3 Enrdlmarrt le�epaled on FTE 8 H�wuM bmis.P223 HeadmuM exdudea ECE 8 CollegeoMy Runnhg Stmf stu0erds.Full headcount InduMng ECE 6 RS=27,842 Some Mtals mey be dightly diflerent due b roundhg. � 13 Juverbes eerved at png County RegbnBi Jus6oe Cen[er are repofted SBpeia�ely tor InatiWUmel Fu�ng an Form E-872.Total RJ WUM in Odobef 2013 is 10. Kent School DisMd StX-Yeer Capifel FarAlities Plan Total' of Appendices A B 8 C April 2014 v�e aa KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 USE of PORTABLES Schopl Year 201&2074 20142016 ?A1S2018 201&2017 ' •2017-2018 2(11&2019 20132020 Reloqtable Use � rro.a siw�i rm.a sn�n rw.or snn�a rm.a s��men rm.a swaem rio.or swdem No.a swaent RaocalaWes CapordY Relodam� CaPad�Y RebeamMea Capv9S Rebcelmlw CaparAy Rebcmedec Capadty Reloml�les CeO�Y R�es CaP�Y RBIOqt8b185 fOf CI838�OOIf1�US8 39 50 86 '!5 93 111 125 Relocatabies for program,use sa ee ea ee as ee ee (ie.Canputer labs,muaic,etc.) Elerrien�ary Capedty Required�24 Z 39 8�8 60 1,206 88 1.684 75 1.800 93 2,ZJ2 117 2,884 128 3,W0 Middle Schoot Capacity Required g 29 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Saniar Hi�Capacity Required�31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 of Relocatables Urilized �z� ��e �sa �aa �s� �as 2�a Class�aom Rebcateble/Capadly Required 39 938 50 1;200 86 1,5&L 78 1,800 93 Y.232 1�1 2,864 12S 3.000 Plan for Allocatiomof Required Classroom Relocatable Facilities included�in Finance Plan: Eleme�rtary ��2 3s so ss �s e3 t�� 2e MWdIe School o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Seniw High 3 0 0 o a o 0 0 Tofai 3B 50 88 75 93 771 726 � Use oi additlonal relocateMen for clessrooma o�speelal proprama la baeed on need and flueWatlone o}enrollment e!eech school. = FWI Oay K6Meipar�en at all Elementary achools MII i�wrease tlre need for relorafablea at tha elamerrtery level untll permarreat eepacity cen be provided. � Alfhough rebcalables are uUNmd for a wide varlety oi purpoaee,�v w�q6uctlon and boutMary ad�ushneMs ere dmed to mlrtimim the requlremeM for.relocatables. icentsax. w�5�-vearcaptaiFad�roesP�an APPEI D avrii zot4 �5 KENT SCHOOL DiSTRfCT Na. 415 Survey for Student Gerreration Fador ��a Elemenfary Taal S 1 u d e n t s Student Generafion�'actor s Sin le Falnily Develo ments nrea unas To�e� eiem nts Hs ro�a� eiem ats Hs sfe Adlets Cove SV11 92 75 50 73 12 0.815 0.543 0.141 0.130 sfo CaMerra PT 14 11 6 2 3 0.786 0428 0.143 0.214 et2 CreeksldeatRiverview NO B1 44 36 2 8 0,643 0.444 0.025 0.074 na Eagle Creat Perk Vlew-Soutl�ridga HE 219 203 124 27 52 0 927 0.586 0.123 0237 te� EasllandMeado�Ag Kent SC 13 20 8 5 7 t538 0.815 0.385 0538 aee Eastpdnte MS 99 58 39 7 10 0.588 0.394 0.071 0.101 sw Fem Creat East Kent SR 177 156 82 21 43 0.912 0.538 0.123 0.261 �to Hlghlend&RliododeMron Eefates ML 41 39 23 7 9 0,851 0.561 0.171 0.220 zze KenUaka HlBhlamie SW 177 144 69 2a 35 0.814 0 503 0.113 0.198 �at Meridi�Ridge HE 70 45 32 5 8 0.843 0.467 O.W1 O.N4 see North Parke Meadowa&Perlte Meadows South CW 708 172 59 72 31 1.057 0.557 0.208 0 282 �2x PeMherMeadows GR 32 32 22 3 7 1.000 0.688 0.094 0219 su Rai�ierVista CW 92 43 25 8 10 0.487 0.272 0.087 0.108 tse Rose's Meadow ML 37 24 12 5 7 0.849 0 324 0.135 0.188 �e 3evane!The Raserve/Stonefield!Crofton Hilla CO 351 385 172 54 139 1.090 0.480 0.154 0.398 �oo Shadow Brook R(dge(FCWesi)-Kent SR 128 114 89 14 31 0.891 0 639 0.709 0242 +m Temareck Ridge CW 134 78 41 70 27 0.582 0.30e 0.0T5 0201 �n The Parke FeirwoodlRenton RW 772 159 77 29 59 0.924 0.413 0.189 0.343 �te TrovitskyPa�ic-Renton RW 167 140 94 2P 28 0.838 0.583 0.120 0.158 ♦fl WoodCreek Cpvitpton CW 154 134 74 22 38 0.870 0.4Bt 0.143 0247 Totel 2,163 1,864 1,046 279 539 0.862 0.484 0.128 0.249 E�a Elementery row S t u d e n t s Student Generetion Fador : Aflulti-Family Develo ments a� u�� Taa� eiem �ns Hs rwai Fxm Ms Ns ae Ada�bApeAmgnts Covington CO 200 78 45 8 25 0.390 0.725 0.000 OJ25 Iu AMBrbrookAparknBnfe-Kent EH 2�7 141 94 22 25 0.881 0.454 0.708 O.f21 ise ArterteApe�tmenfs KeM SH 81 85 43 11 11 0.802 0.531 0.138 0.136 fae Fai�woodPondApaMrents Renton FW 194 72 47 8 17 0.371 0242 O,p41 0.068 +a� Retl Mill at Painwod Renton CC 98 29 f e 3 8 0.302 OJ88 0.031 0.083 oa� Riverview-TheParka Keat NO 150 � 59 36 8 �7 0.383 0240 0.040 0.113 ioz Rock Creek Landing-Kent S6 211 ' 703 72 13 78 0.488 0 341 0.062 0.085 na SilverSprings/lperhneMs KeM PL 251 771 112 20 39 0.881 0.448 0.080 0.155 �9z Sunrise at Benson Condos-KeM GR 88 33 12. 7 f 4 0.375 0 136 0.080 0.759 rotai 7,478 757 479 98 174 0.508 0.324 0.068 0.778 Kent Schod Dblrkt Six-Year CepNal Fadirtes Plan APPEPIDIX E Aprll 2014 Page 38 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE For Kent School District No. 415 2014 Capital Facilities Plan Issued with a 14-day commerrt and appeal period. DescripUon of Proposai: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in eTfect a single action: 1 The adoption of the Kent School District 2014 Six-Year Capftal Facilities Plan by the Kent School District for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the Distrid. 2. The amendment of the King County Comprehensive Plan to include the Kent School Distri�2014 Capital Facilities Pian as a part of the Capital Facilities Plan Element of the King County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of KeM to include the Kent Schooi DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Pian as part of the Capital Facilities Pian Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Kent. 4. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Covington to inGude the Kerrt School DistricYs 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capital FaCilities Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Covington. 5. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Renton to include the Kent School District's 2014 Capital Facilities Plan as part of the Capftal Faalities Plan Element af ihe Comprehensive Plans of the Ciry of Renton. 6. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Aubum to include the Kent School DistricYs 2014 Capitai Facilities Pian as part of the Capital FaciiRies Plan Element of the Comprehensive Plans of the City of Aubum. 7 This proposal may also involve amendment of Comprehensive Pians of the Cities of Biack Diamond, Mapie Valiey, and/or SeaTac to incorporate the Kent School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan into the Capital Facilities element of that jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. 1 Proponent: Kent School District No. 415 Location of the Proposal: The KeM School District includes an area of approximately 70 square miles. The City of Covington and portions of the cities of Kent, Renton, Aubum, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac fall within the District's boundaries, as do parts of unincorporated King County Lead Agency Kent School Distrid No. 415 is the lead agency pursuant to WAC 197-11-926. The lead agency for this proposai has determined that the proposal does not pose a probabfe significant adverse impact ta the environment. An environmerrtal impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after a review of the compfefed environmerttal checkiist and other infortnation on file with the lead agency This information is availabie to the public up6n request. This Determination of Non-sign�cance(DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency wrill not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:00 p.m., June 13, 2014 The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely crortimer�ts and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the D is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the commerrt deadline. Responsible Official: � D Richard A. Stedry, C ief Business Offic.er for Kent School Dishict No. 415 Telephone: (253) 373-7295 Address: 12033 SE 256th Street#A-G00 Kent, Washington 98030-6643 Appeals of this detertnination are govemed by Board Policy No. 6890 which can be obtained from Dr Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer, Kent School District No. 415, 12033 SE 256th Street#A-600, Kerrt, VNashington 98030-6643 and pursuant to WAC 197-11- 680 and RCW 4321 C.075. Date of Issue: May 30, 2014 Date Publishetl: June 6, 2014 2 ENVIRONflAENTAL CHECKLIST UPDATED 2014 WAC 197-11-960 Environmental Checklist. Purpose of Checklist: Govemmerrtat agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmentai impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to detertriine 'rf available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable sign�cant impacts or if an environmental impact statement wiil be prepared to further analyze the proposal instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Piease answer each question accurately and carefuily, to the best of your knowiedge. You may need to consuit with an agency specialist or private consultarrt for some questions. You may use "not applicable" or"does not apply" only when you qn explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-making process. The checklist questions appty to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any add�ional information that will heip describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Piease adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necsssarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the compieteness and accurecy of the chedclist and other supporting doouments Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the appiicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEAAENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site"should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "aifected geographic area," respedively The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) 3 questions in Part B- Environmental Elements—that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal A. BACKGROUND 1 Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of a six-year Capital Facilities Plan by the Kent School District. The Comprehensive Plans of King Courrty, City of Kent, City of Covington, City of Renton, City of Aubum and possibly Cities of Maple Valley, Black Diamond and SeaTac have been andlor will be amended to indude the Kent School District 2014 Capital Facilities Pian in the Capital Facilities Ptan Element of the Comprehensive Plan for each jurisdiction. A copy of the Capital Facil'�ies Plan is available for review in the Kent 8chool District Business Services Department. 2. Name of applicant: Kent School District No. 415. 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street #A-600 Kerrt, WA 98030-6843 Contact Person: Dr Richard A. Stedry, Chief Business Officer Telephone: (253)373-7295 4 Date checklist prepared: May 12, 2014 5. Agency requesting checklist: Kerit School District No. 415 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, 'rf applicable): The 2U14 Kerrt SchQol District Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be forwarded to King Courtty, Cities of Kent, Covington, Rerrton, Aubum, Maple Valley, Black Diamond, and SeaTac for possible inclusion in each jurisdiction's Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facil'dies Plan will be updated annually Site-specific projects have been or will be subject to project-speafic environmental review. 7 Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or cannected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Gapital Facil'�ies Plan reviews proposed dassroom addition at Neely-O'Brien Elementary School, re-opening of the fortner Kent Elementary School as Kent Valley 4 Early Learning Center and proposed construction of a new school that is intended to replace the current Covington Elementary School. The expanded use of portables is pianned to alleviate overcrowding at elementary schools. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. The above-referenced projects wil� undergo environmental review at the time of formai proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for govemmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposai? If yes, expiain. No. 10. List any government approvais or perm�s that will be needed for your proposai, if known. King Courrty and Cities of Kent, Covington and Aubum will review and approve the Capital Facilities Plan for the purposes of impact fee ordinances and will need to adopt the Plan as an amendmeM to the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of King Courrty and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Aubum. Cities of Maple Valley, Biack Diamond, and SeaTac may also review and approve the Plan for the purposes of any schobl impact fee ordinances and may adopt the Plan as an amendment to the Capital Facilities element of their Comprehensive Plans. 11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include adiiitional specific ir�formation on project description.) This is a non-project action. This proposal invoives the adoption of the Kent School District 2014 Capital Facilities Plan for the purpose of planning the facilities needs of the District and for indusion in the Capitai Faal'�ties Plan element and possible amendment of the Comprehensive Pians for King County, City of Covington, City of Kent, City of Renton, City of Aubum, City of Black Diamond, City of SeaTac and City of pAaple Vailey A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the Kent School District Business Services Department office. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal wouid occur over a range of area, provide tha range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal descrfption, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. HVhile you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. s The 2014.Capital Facilities P{an will affect the Kent School District. The District includes an area of approximately 70 square miles. The City of Covingtan, and portions of the Cities of Ke�, Aubuin, Renton, Biack Qiamond, Maple Vailey, SeaTac and parts of unincorporated King Gounty fall within the boundaries of the Kent School District. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS 1 Earth a. General desoription of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other The Kent School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradier�ts, inciuding all of those listed. Specific topographic characteristios wiil be identified during the planning and permit process for each capital project. b. What is the steepest siope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope charactenstics will be identified during the planning and pertnit process for each capital projed. c. Whaf general types of solls are found on the site (for example, c{ay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the class�cation of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Spec�c soil types will be identified during the planning and pertnit process for each capitaf project. d. Are there surFace indications or history of unstable soi{s in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Kent School District. Spec�c soil limitations on individual project sites will be identified at the time of ertvironmental review. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area and approximate quarrtities and total affected area of any filting or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects inGuded in the Capital Facilities Plan will be subject to projed- specific environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, quantity, and source of fill materials will be icientified as appropriate to each project. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. Individual projects and their erosion impacts will be evaluated on a site-spe�c basis. Individual projects witl be subject to environmental review and local approval on the time of proposal. 6 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buiidings?) Percentage of impervious cover will vary with each capital facilities project and will be addressed during project-specific environmental review. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, "rf any Erosion potentia! on individual project sites will be addressed during project-spec�c environmental review. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air wouid resuft from the proposal during construction operation and rriaintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities 'rf known. Various emissions, many construction-related, may resuit from individual projects. Air-quafity impacts wiil be evaluated during project-specific environmental review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generalty describe. Off-sfte sources and necessary mitigation will be addressed during project-spec�c environmental review c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any Plans for individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to environmental review and relevant local approval processes, including obtaining of any necessary air quality permits, at the time individual projects are formaily proposed. Please see the Suppiemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) is there any surtace water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, salfinrater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surtace water bodies within the Kent School District. The surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated in the design of each individual project. 2) Wiil the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach availabie plans. � Some prbjects may require work near these desaibed waters. Individual projects in the Capitai Facilities Plan will be subject to environmental review and iocal approval reciuirements at ttie time the project is formally proposed. 3) Estimate the amount of fili and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be aff'ected. Indicate the source of fill materiai. Information with respect to placemetrt or removal of fill or dredge material wili be addressed at the time of project-spec�c environmental review. Appiicable local regulations have been or wili be sati�ed. 4) Will the prbposal require surface water wfthdrawais or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if knov�in. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions have been or will be addressed during prnject-speafic envirorimenfal review. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each capital facifities project, if located in a floodplain area, will be required to meet applicable Iocal regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surtade waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. S�cific infortnation regarding discharges of waste materials, if any, will be addressed during project-spe�c e�vironmerrtal review. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. b. Ground: 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give general description of the well, proposed us.es and approximate quantities withdrawn from the++vell. Will water be discharged to groundwater?Give general description, purpose, and appro�mate quantities rf known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact ground water resources. Each projed will be evaluated during project-spec�c environmental review. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. Please see the Supplerimental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from sep#ic tanks or afher sources, if any (for example: Domestic savirage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ., agricultural; etc.). Describe the generdl size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be 8 served (if applicabls), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. Impads of discharged waste materiai, if any, have been or will be addressed during sit�specific, project-level environmenta� review. c. Water Runoff(including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff(inciuding storm water) and method of coliection and disposal, ff any (inGude quarrtities, 'rf known). Where will this water flouY?Will this water flow irrto other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying storm water runoff consequences. Each project will be subjed to environmerrtal review and applicable local regulations. 2) Could waste matenals enter ground or surtace waters? If so, generally describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facil�ies Plan will have varying environmental impacts and wiil be subject tb appropriate review and local regulations prior to construction. Information regarding waste materials will be presented at the time of such review Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3) Does the proposal aiter or othervvise affed drainage pattems in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have varying drainage pattem consequences. Each projed will be subject to erivirbnmental review and appiicable local regulations d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surFace, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts have been or will be developed on a project-specific basis in cooperation vuith the appropriate jurisdiction. 4 Plants: a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other _ evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other _ shrubs _ grass _ pasture 9 b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Spec�c impacts to these species from individuai pmjects will be determined at the time of project proposal and will be reviewed in cooperation with the affected jurisdictions. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Impacts on migration routes, ff any, will be addressed during site-specific, project- level environmentai review. d. Proposed measures to preserve o�enhance wildiife, 'rf any� Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wiidlife have been or wiA be determined at the time of site-specific, project-level environmerrtal review e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. An inventory of invasive animal species observed on or near sites has been or will be developed during project-spec�c environmer�tal review 6. Energy and Natural Resources: a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oii, wood stove, solar)wiil be used to meet the completed projecYs energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The State Board of Education requires a life-cyGe cost anaiysis of all heating, lighting, and insulating systems prior to allowing specific projects to proceed. Energy needs will be decided at the time of specific engineering and site design planning. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. b. Would your project affect the potentiai use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe: Individual projects of this Capital Facil'�ties Plan will be evaluated as to their impact on the solar potential of adjacent projects during environmental review. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are inGuded in the plans of this proposal7 List other p�oposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, ff any Energy conservation measures will be considered at the project-spec�c design phase and environmerrtal review 7 Erivironmental Health: 11 a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spiil, or hazardous waste, that could occu�as a resutt of this proposal? if so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area in the vicinity Piease see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the projecYs devetopment or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 5} Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any Proposed projeds will compiy with all current codes, standards, and rutes and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to environmental review and loca� approvai at the time of formal submittal. b. Noise: 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises exist within the Kent School District. Spec�c noise sources have been or will be identified during project-specific environmental review. 2) What types and levels of noise wbuld be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: tra�c, construction, operation, other)? indicate what hours �oise would come from the site. Normal construction noises wouid exist on a short-term basis during school construction. There could be an increase in tra�c or operations-related noise iz which would be addres§ed during project specific environmentai review. Please see the Suppiemental Sheet for Non-project Actions. 3) Prbposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Project noise impacts have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during the project-specific environmental review Each project is or wiil 6e subject to app(icabls local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use: a. What i§the currerd use of the site and adjacent properties? There are a variety of land uses within the Kerit Schooi District, including residential, �mmercial, industrial, institutional, utility, agricuttural, forestry, open space, recreational, etc. b. Has the site been used as working farmfands or working forest lands? If so describe. How much agricuRural or forest land of long-term commercial sign�cance will be �nverted to other uses as a resuft of the proposal, if an�? If resource lands Kave not been designated, how mariy acres in fartnland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? 1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by suRounding working farm orforest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how• This question witl be addressed during site-spe�c, projed-level environmerital review. c. Describe any structures on the site. Structures lorated on proposed sites have been or will be identified and described during project-specific environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? Structures to be demolished, 'rf any, will be ident�ed as part of the project-specific environmental review process. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? There are a variety of zoning class�cations within the Kent School District. Site specific zoning ir�formation has been or will be identified during project-specifc environmental review. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? An inventory of comprehensive plan designations has been or will be completed during project-specific environmental review. 13 g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master prbgram designation of the site? Any shoreline master program designations have been or will be iderrt�ed during project-spec�c environmental review. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by city or county7 If so, specify Environmentally sensitive areas, ff any, will be ident�ed during project-specific environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? This information has been or will be provided at the time of project-spec�c environmerrtal review. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? It is not anticipated that proposed projects will displace any people. Displacement of people, if any, will be evaluated during project-specific environmental review k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, 'rf any� Individual projects included in the Capital Facil"dies Plan witl be subject to project- specific environmental review and local approval at the time the project is formally proposed. I. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any Compatibility of the proposai and specific projects with existing uses and pians have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agri6ultural and forest lands of long-term commercial signficance, 'rf any Compatibility of the proposal and specific projects with existing uses and plans have been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-specific environmental review. 9. Housing: a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided. 14 b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, iniddle, or low-income housing. Any impact of project proposals on existing housing has been or would be evaluated during project-specific environmental review prooeiiures. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts have been or wiil be addressed during site-spec�c, project-level environmental review. 10. Aesthetics: a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior buiiding material(s) proposed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-specific, project- level environmerrtal review. b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Aesthetic impacts have been or will be determined at the time of site-spec�c, ptoject- level environmental review. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impads, if any Appropriate measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts have been or will be detertnined at the time of project-specific environmental review. 11 Light and Glare: a. What type of IigM or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day wrould it mainfy occur? Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specific environmental review. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard w interfere with views7 Light or glare impacts have been or will be determined at the time of project-specfic environmental review. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare have been or will be evaluated at the time of project specific environmental review. is tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-spec�c basis. d. Proposed measures to avoid, riminimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed on a project-specific basis. 14 Transportation: a. IdeMify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site pians, if any impact on public streets and highways has been or will be assessed during project- specific environmental review. b. Is sfte or affeded geographic area currently served by pubiic transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between specific projects and public transit has been or will be assessed during project-specific environmental review. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How mariy would the project or proposal eliminate? An inventory of parking spaces and the impacts of spec�c projects on parking spaces have been or will be conducted during project-specific environmental review. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The development of new schools may require new access roads or streets. This issue wiil be fully addressed during project-specfic environmental review. e. Wiil the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinify o� water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail or air transportation has been or will be addressed during site- spec�c, project-level environmental review. f. How many vehicular trips per day wauld be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percerrtage of volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? Each project proposal has been or will be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. 17 g. Wiil the proposal intertere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultu�al and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. Each project prbposal has been or wiii be separately evaluated as to traffic impacts. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation irripacts, if any Mitigation of impacts on transportation has been or will be addressed during project- specific envirorimerital review. 15. Public Services: a. Would the projed resuk in an increased need for pubiic services (for example: fire protection, police protection, heafth care, schools, other)? If so, generalty describe. T`he District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will substarrtially increase the need for other public services. impacts have been or will be evaluated on a project-specitic basis. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impads on public services, if any. Schools are built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alartns, heat sensors and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities: a. CirGe utilities curcently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other Utilities available at project sRes have been or will be ident�ed during project spec�c environmental review. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the generai construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs will be identified during project-spec�c erivironmental review. ie C. SIGNATURE The above ers are true and compiete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the ad ency is reiying on them to make its decision. � Signature: r Richard A. Stedry hief Business Officer Date Submitted: May 30, 2014 19 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (do not use this sheet for project adions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environmeM. When answ�ring these guestions, be aware of the exterrt the proposal or the types of activfties IiKely to resuft from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemenYed. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1 How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water emissions to air; productian, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent this Plan makes it more tikely that school facilities will be constructed, and/or renovated or remodeled, some of these environmental impacts will be more likely. Additional impertneable surfaces, such as roofs, parking lots, sidewalks, access roads and playgrounds will increase storm water runoff, which could enter surface or ground water Emissions to air could result from heating systems, emergency generators and other equipment, anii from additional car and tius trips to and from the schooi for students and faculty Any emissions resulting from this Plan should not re.qui2 the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possibie exception of storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. Noise may resuit from additional traffic and from concentrating several hundred children at a new facility, especially before and after school and during recesses. To the extent this proposal allows additional residential development to occur, these impacts wouid also increase somewhat, but it is not possible to quantify those impacts at this time. The impacts wouid depend on the type, location and distribution of housing, for example, whether single or multipie family and the location of the school. Prop6sed measures to avoid or redu6e such increases are: Facilities implemerrting the Plan have been or will be evaluated at the project specific level and impacts will be mitigated accordingly Storm wate�detention and runoff will meet appiicable County and/or City requirements and, de�nding on the date of actual construction, may be subject to a National Poliutarrt Discharge E{imination System ("NPDES'� permitting requirements. Discharges to air will be minimal, and wili meet.any applicable requirements of the Puget Sound Air Pollution Confrol Authority Fuel oil will be stored according to local and state requirements. 20 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine li�e? The Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. Depending on the particular site, construction of facilities may require clearing sites of plants and loss of animal habitat. To the extent residential development is allowed, additional area may be cleared and etiminated as habitat for animals. There are not likely to be any impacts on fish or marine life, although some water quality degradation in streams and rivers could ocair due to increased residential development. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-speciflc environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animais, fish, or marine life are: Individual projects will be evaluated and mitigated appropriately on a project-spec�c basis, but specific mitigation proposals cannot be identified at this time. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Any actual projects resufting from this Plan would consume heating fuel and electrical energy Increased traffic resulting from the construction of additional facilities would consume petroleum based fuels. Reduced tra�c resuiting from construction of another neighborhood schooi may aiso reduce amounts of fuel consumed, but it is not possibie to quaMify such reduction in consumption at this time. These impacts have been or will be addressed in mare detail duririg project-specific environmental review when appropriate. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: Facilities would be constructed in accordance with appiicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affiect ernironmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligibie or under study)for govemmental protection; such as parks, wildemess, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetiands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Plan and facilities constructed pursuant to the Pian should have no impact on these resources. It is not possible to predict whether other development made possible by this Plan would affect sensitive areas. Pro�sed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: No spec�c measures are being proposed at this time. Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-specific review. Annuai updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County, Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Aubum, Black Diamond, SeaTac, anii Maple Valley as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the School DistricPs facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 2� 5. How wouid the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, inGuding whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Pian will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None a2 proposed at this time. Adual facifities constructed to implemerrt the Plan wiil be sited and constructed to avoid or reduce land use impacts. 6. How would the proposai be iikely to inaease demands on transportation or public services and utilities? This proposal should not create s,ubstarrtial new demands for transportation. The projects included in the Capital Fecilities Plan may create an increase in traffic near new Distrid facilities but a(so reduce traffic by creating the opportunity for more studerrts to walk to a closer school. The construdion of the facilities included in the Capital Facilfties Plan may result in minor increases in the demand for public services and utilities, such as fire and police protection, and water, sewer, and electric utilities. None of these impacts are Iikely to be sign�carrt. The impacts on transportation and public services and utilities of the projeds induded in the Capital Facilities Plan will be addressed during project-level review when appropriate. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond fo such demands are proposed at this time. 7 Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requiremertts for the protection of the environment. 22 * cmr oF *�' * Memorandum � �1 WASHINGTON To: Planning and Community Development From: Finance Department, Capital Projects Date: October 2,2014 Re: DRAFT 6-Year Capital Facilities Plan(20152020) Please find attached the final copy of our 20152020 Draft Capital Facilities Plan (CFP), the capital facilities element of the Citys Comprehensive Plan. For questions or additional information on the preparation of this document, please contact Consuelo Rogel at (253) 8045023 or croqelC�aubu�nwa.pov Questions regarding specific projects contained in the document should be directed to the department managing the project(s). A capital facilities plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing ppital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such qpital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities vvith ideM�ed sources of funding. The attached CFP satisfies the GMA requi'rement for a Capital Facilities Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following projects have been added, removed or revised from the previous year's CFP (20142019) due to the creation of new projects, completion of projects or changes in project titles andlor priorities: Water,Sewer,Stortn Utilities Additions • Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation (Water, page 105) . Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation (Water, page 121) • Lea Hill-132ntl Ave DisVibution System Modifications (Water, page 122) • Aubum Way S6uth Flooding Imprbvements Phase 2 (Water, page 123&Sewer, page 138) • Auburn Way South-0ogwood to Fir (Water, page 124) • Auburn Way South—Fir to Hemlock (Water, page 125) • Auburn Way South—Muckieshoot Plaza tb Dogwood (Water, page 126) • Reservoir Painting (Water, page 127) • 24"White River Crossing (Water, page 128) Page 1 of 4 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Water,Sewer,Stortn Utilkies Additions(corrtinued) . BNSF Utility Crossing (Sewer, page 139) • Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement (Sewer, page 140) • M Street SE Stortn Improvement (Storm, page 148) . Howard fZoad Improvements (Storm, page 149) • 37'"St. NW Stortn Improvement (Stortn, page 150) • M&O Storm Drainage Improvements (Stortn, page 151) . Hillside Drainage Assessment (Stortn, page 164) • North Airport Area Improvements (Stortn, page 165) . D Street SE Storm Improvement (Stortn, page 166) . Anne�cation area Small Storm Improvement (Storm, page 167) Deletions • Well 5 Upgrade(Water) • We117 Emergency Power(Water) . Maintenance&Operations Expansion(Water,Sewer, Storm) • U6lities Field Operations Center(Sewer,Storm) • Vactor Decant Facility(Stortn) Transportation Projects(see TIP for further details) Additions . 46"'Place S Realignment (page 42) • Tra�c Management Center Improvements (page 49) • West Valley Highway Improvements-15"'St NW to W Main St (page 50) . Lake Tapps Parkway ITS 6cpansion (page 51) . Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements (page 55) • I Street N_E and 22ntl St NE Roundabout Safety Improvement (page 64) • West Valley Highway Improvements SR-18 to 15'"St SW (page 65) . A Street SE 8 6"'Street SE Safety and Access Improvements (page 77) • Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation (page 86) . Auburn Way North Preservation-22ntl Street NE to 45"'Street NE (page 89) • 15�'Street NEINW Preservation SR-167 to 8"'SVeet NE (page 90) Page 2 of 4 riVBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Deletions • I Street NE Corridor • A Street NW, Phase 2 • D Street NW, 37"'to 44"' . Environmental Park Roadway Improvements Study . Downtown to Les Gove Non-Motorized Improvements Study • S 316'"Street Bicycle 8 Pedestrian Improvement Study . East Valley Highway ITS Expansion • Citywide Guardrail Improvements • Annual Bridge Structure PreservaGon • Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Improvements • West Valley Highway System Preservation(15'"St NW to 37"'St NW) • Arterial Bridge Deck Rehabilitation Parks,Arts&Recreation Projects Additions • SunsetPark (page190) Deletions • Veteran's Park Improvements • Centennial Viewpoint Park • Williams Pipeline Trail . Dysktra Park Improvement Community Improvements/General Municipal Buildings Additions . M80 Small Equipment and Tool Storage Building (page 203) • M80 Lunchroom Expansion (page 204) • Aubum Environmental Park Boardwalk Phase 2 (page 216) • Downtown Wa�nding Program (page 217) • Green River Park Design (page 218) • Les Gove Campus Master Plan (page 21 g) • Main SVeet Streetscape Urban Design (page 220) • City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration (page 221) Page 3 M 4 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU 1MAGWED Deletions . City Hall HVAC System Upgrade • City Hall Remodel, Phase 2 8 3 • Future Capacity Project Funding Airport Additions • South T-Hangar Row 3 EnGosure (page 229) • Obstruction Survey for NexGen/GPS Approach (page 230) • Land Acquisition for Future Approaches (page 231) . Runway 6ctension (page 233) . Automated Weather Observation System (page 234) • Fuel Farm (page 235) • Land Acquisition-ArmsVong (page 236) . Precision Approach Path Indicator(PAPI)for Runway (page 237) • West Side Fencing (page 238) . Taxiway Seal Coat 8 Reshipe (page 240) Deletioris • Hangar Roof Repair/Replacement • Airport Master Pian Update • Asphalt Rehabilitation and Seal Coat Cemetery Detetions . Memory Heights New Development Page 4 of 4 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � CITY OF �� , * r - - a ` * WASHINGTON CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2015 - 2020) Adopted by Ordinance No xxxx, December_, 2014 as part of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan City of Auburn 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 931-3000 www.auburnwa.gov City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � - �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2015 —2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction Purpose 7 Statutory Requirement for Capital Facilities Elements 7 Concurrency and Level of Service 8 Implementation g 2. Goals and Policies 1 Capital Facilities Response to Growth 11 2. Financial Feasibility 11 3. Public Heaith and Erivironment. 13 4. Consistency With Regional Planning 13 3. Capitallmprovements Introduction 15 Transportation 17 Arterial Street(102) Capital Projects. 22 Local Street (103) Capital Projects 82 Street Preservation Fund (105) Capital Projects 84 Water 93 Sanitary Sewer 131 Storm Drainage 141 Solid Waste 169 Parks, Arts and Recreation. 171 General Wlunicipal Buildings 197 Community Improvements 2p7 Airport, 2z5 Cemetery 241 Golf Course 243 Police Department. 245 Valley Regional Fire Authority 247 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � �k MORE THAN �OU IMAGINED City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A capital facilities element is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA). Capital facilities generally have long useful lives, significant costs and tend to not be mobile. The GMA requires that capital facilities elements include an inventory of existing capital facilities showing locations and capacities, a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities and at least a six-year plan tb finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The GMA also requires that the land use element be reassessed if probable funding falls short of existing needs. This document is the City's six-year Capitai Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP, in conjunction with other City adopted documents, satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities Element. It addresses one of the GMA's basic tenets: to provide adequate facilities to support development in accordance with locally adopted level of service standards. This CFP will enable the City to: (1) make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars, and (2) make timely decisions about maintaining level of service in accordance with this CFP and other adopted plans. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT This CFP consists of the following: Chapter 7 Introduction Purpose of CFP, statutory requirements, methodology Chapter 2. Goals and Policies Goals and policies related to the provision of capital facilities. Chapter 3. Capital Improvements Proposed capital projects, which include the financing plan and reconciliation of project capacity to level of service (LOS) standards. This CFP is a companion document to the Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 5). The Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan identifies the Citys planning approach and policy framework for the provision of capital facilities. This CFP provides the background inventory, identifies proposed projects and establishes the six-year capital facilities plan for financing capital facilities. The comprehensive plan contains timeframes which are the intended framework for future funding decisions and within which future actions and decisions are intended to occur However, these timeframes are estimates; depending on factors involved in the processing of applications and project work, and the availability of funding, the timing may change from the included timeframes. The framework does not represent actual commitments by the City of Auburn that may depend on funding resources available. 1 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS In planning for capital facilities, contempiation of future growth needs to be considered. The CFP is based on the following City population forecast: Yea� Population 2013 73,235 2014 74,630 2020 85,288 The popula.tion forecasts are based on information from the State of Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) as well as estimates developed by the City of Aubum Planning and Community Development Department. CAPITAL.COSTS OF FACILITIES Based on the analysis of capital improvements contained in this document, the cost of City- owned and mariaged capital improvements for 2015-2020 is summarized as follows: Type of Facility 2015 -2020 Transportation -Arterial (102) $ 102,923,867 Transportation -Local (103) 10,600,000 Transportation - Street (105) 16,347,850 Water 30,832,065 Sanitary Sewer 11,345,160 Storm Drainage 14,710,042 Parks, Arts & Recreation 24,205,000 General Municipal Buildings 5,537,223 Cor»muriity lmprovements 5,323,161 Airport 3,893,170 To.tal $ 225,717,538 2 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES The financing plan for the citywide capital improvements includes: Funding Source 2015 - 2020 Gapital Facility Grants 85,704,577 Transportation (Includes grant funding that has not 5,580,000 Parks, Arts & RecPeation been secured) 1,150,000 Community Improeements 259,887 Storm Drainage 3,188,362 Airport User Fees/Fund Balance 15,033,065 Water 11,845,160 Sewer 12,942,680 Storm Drainage 379,620 Community Impro�,ements 1,270,000 Equipment Rental 704,808 Airport _ Arterial Street Fund 3,426,000 Transportation Local Street Fund 850,000 Transportation Arterial Street Preservation Fund 632,420 Transportation BondProceeds 15,999,000 Water - -- 1,482,392 Storm Drainage 6,000,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Municipal Parks Fund 400,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation_ _ _ _ PropertyTax 775,000_ _ Parks, Arts_& Recreation Sa/es Tax 8,850,000 Transportation UtilityTax 10,932,850 TranspoRation Mitigation/Impact Fees 15,200,870 Transportation 900,000 Parks, Arts & Reoreation 201,568 Communit Impro�ements REET 1 1,059,219 Parks, Arts & Recreation 3,967,223 General Municipal Buildings REET2 3,341,973 Gommunit Im ro�,ements Othe�Sources 3,375',000 Transportation 525,083 Storm Drainage 250,000 Community Impro�,ements 9,490,781 Parks, Arts & Recreation Total $ 225,717,538 3 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS The forecasted impacts of new capital facilities on the City's future oPerating budgets (2015-2020) are as follows: BudgetYear 2016 2077 2018 2019 �2020 2021 ToWI 1 Transportation $100,807 $103,307 $107,407 $121,007 $182,607 $235,957 $ 851,092 2 Water 2,400 2,400 2,400 3,000 3,000 3,000 16,200 3 Sanitary Sewer - - - - - - - 4 Storm Oralriage - - - - 5 So/id Waste - - - - - - - 6 Parks,ArtsaiWRecreation - 171,000 171,000 183,000 183,000 183,000 891,000 7 Genera/MunicipalBulldings - - - - - - 8 Communitylmpovements 500 500 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 43.000 9 Airport - - - - - - - 10 Cemetery - - - - - - - 11 Go/f Course - - - - - - - 12 SeniwCenter - - - - - - - 13 Pollce Department - - - - - - 14 Fire Protection - - - - - - - Tota� 5103,707 8277,207 $291,307 5377,507 5379,107 5432,457 E1,801,292 Project summary details are located on the following pages: Transportation page 91 Water page 129 Parks&Recreation page 194 Community Improvements page page 223 4 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP Based on the proposed six-year capital projects and the projected population increase of 10,658 (14.3%) between 2014 and 2020, the LOS for the following City-owned public facilities will change as follows: The LOS for the following facilities will be increased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2014 LOS to the projected 20120 LOS. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2014 LOS 2020 LOS Pro'ected Cemetery Burial Plots per 1,000 Pop. 30.03 40.80 Community Parks Acres p.er 1,000 Pop. 3.16 3.46 The LOS for the following facilities will be maintained as a result of the CFP CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2014 LOS 2020 LOS (Projected Roads Volum e/Ca aci Rah'o "D" "D" Arrport %AirOperations Support 100% 100% Sanitary Sewer Residential GPCPD (Nofe 1) 171.00 171.00 Storm Draina e N/A Water ResidenGal GPCPD (Note 1)_ 230.00 230.00 Note 1 GPCPD = Gallons per Custom er per Day The LOS for the following facilities will be decreased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2014 LOS to the projected 2020 LOB. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2014 LOS 2020 LOS (Pro'ected Nre Profection Apparatus per 1,000 Pop. 0.21 0.20. General Municipal Bu!ldings Sq. Ft. p"er 1,000 Pop. 3,503.07 3,130.98 GolfCourse Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.24 0.21 Linear Parks Acres_per 1,000 Pop. 0.44 0.38 Nei hb orhood Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.86 0.86 Open Space Acres per 1,000 Pop. 4.66 4.08 Senior Cente� Sq. R.per 1,000 Pop. 168.83 14773 3pecial Use Areas Acres per 1,000 Pop. 0.73 0.64 Level of Service (LOS) is a common measure used to determine the efficiency or effectiveness of services. For the City of Auburn, LOS targets serves as a means to assess the adequacy of public facilities in meeting the needs of the population for which it serves. 5 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan For example, in the case of park space, when there is an increase in population without a corresponding increase in park acreage, the LOS unit of ineasure (acres per 1,000 population) will decline, indicating a potential need to increase the total amount of park acreage to keep pace with population growth. On the other hand, a slight increase in population, coupled with a large increase in facilities, will result in an increased LOS. For example, facilities such as buildings or burial plots may be constructed or expanded to keep pace with anticipated population growth. While this will have the effect of increasing LOS in the short-term, in the longer-term, the LOS wiil gradually decline to the targeted level based on forecasted population. The impact of population growth to the LOS for facilities will vary depending on the type of facility and long range pianning by the City CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) are principally the comprehensive plans for the various public facilities included in this CFP These individual comprehensive plans provide detailed identification of projects and identify their(projects) proposed funding sources. City documents include: • City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan Element (2013); • City Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (2001-2020); • City Comprehensive Water Plan (2009); • City Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2012)and Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2015-2020); • City Comprehensive Drainage Pian (2009); • City Comprehensive Sewer Plan (2009); . City 2015-16 Biennial Budget and 2013 Annual Financial Report; and, • Master plan update for parks, as weil as numerous other planning and financial documents. All documents are available for public inspection at the City of Auburn. 6 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a 6-year plan (2015-2020) for capital improvements that support the City of Auburn's current and future growth. In this plan, funding for general government projects is identified. To maintain consistency with individual master and utility comprehensive plans, applicable projects in the 6-year window of those master/utility plans are included in tliis CFP The CFP also identifies LOS standards, where applicable, for each public facility STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d) requires thaf the comprehensive plan capital facilities element include "a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes." RCW 36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have "probable funding" to pay for capital facility needs, or else the City must"reassess the land use element." In addition, the capital facilities element must include the location and capacity of existing facilities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed locations and capacities. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accomplished for water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, police and fire protection facilities. The GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital facilities. As a result, public facilities in the CFP should be based on quantifiable, objective measures of capacity such as traffic volume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In some insfances, though, level of service may best be expressed in terms of qualitative statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility Factors that influence local level of service standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, national and local standards, and Feilerai and State mandates. To be effective, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines suggest that the CFP be updated at least every hvo years. In 2007, the City transitioned to a biennial budget. With this in mind, the City will follow these guidelines and update the CFP at least every two years, incorporating the capital facilities improvements in the City's biennial budget process. 7 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plgn CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Concurrency The GMA requires that jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place or available within a specified time frame when development occurs. This concept is called concurrency Uniie�the GMA, concurrency is required for transportation facilities and is re.c.ommended by the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer Concurrency has a direct relationship to level of service. The importance of concurrency to capital facilities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the level of service for a capital facility below the locally adopted minimum. The level of service is unique for each type of facility and ispresenfed in the subsequent sections. Expla�ation of Level of Service As indicated earlier, the GMA requires that level of service be established for certain transportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrency to development proposals. The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of level of service standards for other capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public facilities. Typically, measures of level of service are expressed as ratios of facility capacity to demand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1 lists generic examples of level of service measures for some capital facilities: TABLE 1-1 Sample Level of Service Measurements T e of Facili Sam le Level of Service Measure General Municipal Buildings Square feet per 1,000 population Parks Acres per 1,000 population Roads and Streets Ratio of actual wlume to design capacity Sevtier/ Water Gallons r customer r da The need for capital facilities is largely determined by a communit�s adopted LOS standards and whether or not the community has formaily designated capital facilities, other than transportation, as necessary for development to meet the concurrency test. The CFP itself is therefore largely influenced by the selection of the level of service standards. Level of service standards are measures of the quality of life in the City The standards shouid be based on the City's vision of its future and its values. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. The CFR is sensitive to funding and revenue availability and therefore needs to be constantly monitored against variatioris in available resources. To facilitate its implementation, the CFF should be kept current. 8 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Update of Capital Facilities Plan Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFP current is to update it regularly so the six- year plan is a rolling CFP Again, the State recommends that the CFP be updated at least biennially The City of Auburn will seek to update the CFP at least biennialiy in conjunction with the budget process. Future updates will consider• A. Revision of population projections, including annexations; B. Update of inventory of public facilities; C. Update of costs of public facilities; D Update of public faciiities requirements analysis (actual level of service compared to adopted standards); E. Update of revenue forecasts; F Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next six fiscal years; and, G. Update analysis of financial capacity Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to level of service standards, capital projects, and/or the financing plan sources of revenue are all actions that can keep the CFP current and relevarit to City decision-making. 9 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan �o � CITY OF � � � 1VIORE '�'I�Al� �'OiJ IIVIAGIIVED �o City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CHAPTER2 GOALS AND POLICIES This chapter identifies goals and policies specific to the Citys provision of capital facilities. Goal 1 Provide a variety of responses to the demands of growth on public facilities. Policy 1 1 Establish land use pattems that optimize the use of pubiic facilities. Policy 1.2 Provide additional public facility capacity when existing facilities are used to their maximum level of efficiency (consistent with adopted standards for level of service). Policy 1.3 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an efficient manner Policy 1 4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program: 1 4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.27.095, 58.17.033 or 58.17 170. 1 4.2 Development that creates no added impact on public facilities. 1 4.3 Expansions of existing development that were disclosed and tested for concurrency as part of the original application. Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the City to fund or within the City's authority to require others to provide. Policy 2.1 Establish level of service standards that are achievable with the financing plan of this Capital Facilities Plan. Policy 2:2 Base the financing plan for public facilities on realistic estimates of current local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be received by the City Policy 2.3 Match revenue sources to capitai projects on the basis of sound fiscal policies. 2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs through utility enterprise funds, based on user fees and grants. Public facilities included in utilities are sewer, solid waste, storm drainage, anii water 2.3.2 Where feasible pursue joint venture facility construction, construction timing, and other facility coordination measures for City provided facilities, as well as with school districts and other potential partners in developing public facilities. 2.3.3 The City shall continue to assist through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available, the City may participate in developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the extent that the improvements benefit the broader public interest, and are consistent with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan. 11 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan �olicy 2.4 If the projected funding is inadequate to finance needed public facilities and utilities based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth, the City will do one or more of the following to achieve a balance between available revenue and needed public faciiities: — 2.4 1 Lower the level of service standards; 2.4.2 Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources; 2.4.3 Adopt new sources of revenue; , 2.4.4 Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense; and/or 2.4.5 Amend the Land Use Element to reduce the need for additional public facilities. Policy 2.5 Both existing and future development will pay for the costs of needed capital improvements. 2.5.1 Ensure that existing development pays for capital improvements that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or all of the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Existing development may also pay a portion of the cost of capital improvements needed by future development. Existirig developmenYs payments may take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. 2.5.2 Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities which it requires. Future development may also pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. Future developmenYs payments may take the form of voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user's fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. Policy 2.6 The City will determine the priority of public facility capital improvements using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue source that can�ot be used for the highest priority will be used beginning with the highest priority for which the revenue can legally be expended. 2.6.1 Projects that eliminate hazardous conditions. 2.6.2 Refurbishment of existing facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining standards for adopted level of service. 2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in level of service for existing demand. 2.6.4 New or ekpanded facilities that provide the adopted level of service for new development and redevelopment during the next siic fiscal years. 2.6.5 Capital improvements that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility, or otherwise mitigate impacts of public facilities on future operating budgets. 12 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 2.6.6 Capital improvements that contribute to stabilizing and developing the economy of the City 2.6.7 Project priorities may also involve additional criteria that are unique to each type of public facility, as described in other elements of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 2.7 Ensure that the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the facility Goal 3 Protect public health, environmental quality, and neighborhood stability and viabiiity through the appropriate design and installation of public facilities. Policy 3.1 Promote conservation of energy, water and other natural resources in the location and design of public facilities. Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered. Policy 3.3 Practice efficient and environmentally responsible maintenance and operating procedures. Policy 3.4 The siting, design, construction and improvement of all public buildings shall be done in full compliance with the American"s with Disabilities Act (ADA). Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stability and growth through strategic investments in public facilities and public private/partnerships. Goal 4 Make the Capital Facilities Plan consistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan, and - to the e�ctent feasible - with othei city, county, regional and state adopted plans. Policy 4.1 Ensure that the growth and development assumptions used in the Capital Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of the comprehensive plan. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non-city providers of public facilities on a joint program for maintaining applicable level of service standards, concurrency requirements, funding and construction of public facilities. Goal 5 Provide public facilities that p�ovide a sense of community that is inclusive of diverse populations. Policy 5.1 Contribute to community pride and foster a sense of community through provision of public facilities that create a community gathering place for neighbors, family and friends. Policy 5.2 Through prbvision of public facilities offer a broad range of activities promoting social interactions especialiy with new residents. Policy 5.3 Provide maximum fleicibility and multipie uses through design of public facilities that are adaptable to changing interests. Policy 5.4 Provide a community center facility that is financially feasible, affordable for participants, and can generate revenue to offset a portion of the operating costs. 13 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 14 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CHAPTER 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION This CFP includes City capital improvement projects and the financing plan to pay for those projects. It also contains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies level of service standards, where applicable. Each type of City public facility is presented in a separate subsection that follows a standard format. Throughout this section, tables of data are identified with abbreviations that correspond to the type of facility For example, Table W-1 refers to Table 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreviation corresponds to the name of the type of facility 1. Narrative Summarv This is an overview of the data, with sections devoted to Current Facilities, Level of Service, Capital Facilities Projects and Financing, and Impact on Future Operating Budgets. 2. Inventorv of Facilities (Table X-11 This is a list of existing capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to level of service), and location. This table also includes any proposed capital projects and the planned inventory total through December 31, 2020. 3. Caoital Proiects and Financina Pian (Table X-2. X-2A and X-26) This is a list of capital improvements that identifies existing deficiencies, identifies facilities needed for future growth, and identifies the need to repair or replace obsolete or worn out facilities through December 31, 2020. Each list shows the proposed financing pian followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. 4. Imoact on Future Ooeratinq Budaets (Table X-31 This is a list of new capital projects and the forecasted impacts on the City's future operating budgets (2016—2021). 15 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 16 City ofAuburri Draft Cgpital Facilities Plan TRANSPORTATION Current Facilities F2oadwavs: The Citys street system consists of a network of 216 miles of arterials, collectors, local streets and alleys. Existing non-motorized facilities include a mix of sidewalks, bicycle lanes and sharrows. Transit: King County Metro Transit, Sound Transit and Pierce Transit serve the Auburn area. Auburn is currently served by eight Met�o bus routes, two Sound Transit bus routes, and one Pierce Transit bus route. Twenty Sound Transit "Sounder" commuter rail trains stop at Auburn each weekday at the Auburn station located at 23 A Street SW The Sounder also prbvides special event service to selected sporting events. Bus and rail service is supported by park and ride facilities and the Aubum Transit Center Level of Service (LOS) Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Level of Service (LOS) standards for both arterials and transit routes. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction's LOS standards be coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the actual standards and the methods used are determined by each local jurisdiction. Under GMA, the focus is on the performance of the whole road system, not on individual intersections or roadways. LOS standards are a tool to help keep the transportation system in balance with the needs of forecast population growth and development. Table T-1a suinmariies the LOS definitions. 17 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Table T-1a Definition of Urban St�eet Level of Senrice (LOS) LOS A • describes primarify free flow operations a[ a�.erage traeel speeds, usually ab'out 90 percent of th'e free flow speed for the gi�.en street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maheueer within the tratfic stream. Control delay a( signalized intersections is minimal. —e. _....--- `-'-- -- --- ' --- - -- --- . .. . . , .. . .. . - -� - - - - LOS B - describes reasonably unimpeded operatio�s at aeerage traeel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. The ability to maneu�.er within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and stopped delays are rwt bothersome. LOS C - describes stable conditions; howeaer, ability to maneu�.er and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, ad�,erse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower aaerage tresel speeds of about 50 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. LOS D - borders on a range in which small increases in flav may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in traeel speed. LOS D may be due to adeerse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high wlumes, or some combination of these factors. Aeerage traeel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed. LOS E • is characterized by significant delays and a�erage traeel speeds of 33 percent or less of the free flow speed. Such operations are caused by a combination of ad�.erse progression, high signal density high wlumes, extensiee delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. LOS F - is characterized by urtian street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one-fourth of the free flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high wlumes and extensiee queuin . Source: 2010 FigMx ay CapacRy Manual, Special f�port 209, Transportffiion Research Board,Washington, D.G 2000, page '10-5 A methodology and set of standards have been drafted for the City of Auburn ComprehensiVe Plan. The standards help determine concurrency (i.e., balance) between transportation and land use elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, as required by the GMA. The City has four choices if it finds the standards cannot be met. . Modify the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to reduce traffic. • Construct additionai transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new development. • Implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to increase use of non single occupant vehicle travel modes. • Relax the LOS standards; the City can accept lower level of service standards to encourage further growth and minimize the need for additional transportation facilities. The transportation land-use balance will be monitored through the City's Concurrency Management System as part of the State Environmentai Policy Act (SEPA). Transportation concurrency will be evaluated for key facilities and on a system-wide basis. By having system- wide and facility-based roadway LOS standards, the City of Auburn can define preliminary capacity needs. The City can then identify locations where standards are not anticipated to be met in the future and identify appropriate imprbveinents. At the project level, the State Environmentai Policy Act (SEPA) process will continue to guide the more specific planning and analysis efforts. 18 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Level of Service Standards LOS standards can help identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will impact system operations. LOS provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. LOS standards can also be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developmerSts to the surrounding street system. They can assure that all developments are served by a safe, efficient and cost-effective street system. They can also be used to disclose impacts, identify remedial actions, and apportion costs beiween public and private sources. The LOS standards shown in Table T-1b apply to the facility's location and its functional classification. A more detailed description of the level of service methodology is provided in the City of Au.burn Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2012), page 5-4 Table T- 1b Draft Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS Standards Roa dway/I nte rse cti on Max i m u m_V/C_Rati olLOS A�terial Corridor O• Si nalized_lnte�section D Unsignalized lntersection D 'Unless otherw ise specfiied in Chapter 2 of the of Auburn Corrprehensive Transportation Ran, 2012 LOS standards are aiso the basis of an equitable fraffic impact fee system, which require developments to pay a portion of the costs for capacity improvements to the transportation infrastructure. In 2001, the City implemented a traffic impact fee program. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate tra�c impacts more equitably while making the costs of development more predictable to developers. In 2007, the City implemented an additional transportation impact fee to address the impacts of heavy truck usage on the City's transportation system. Both fees are regularly updated to enable the City to construct road capacity to meet the traffic demand of development. Measuring Transportation System Performance The level of service for street segments or links is analyzed with two primary purposes in mind. First, this site-specific LOS can be used, with the help of a travel demand model, to evaluate areas of congestion within a transportation network, leading to the development of a long-range transportation facilities plan. Second, arterial corridor LOS analysis can be used to assess concurrency or if facilities are meeting the LOS standards. The City of Auburn currently uses Highway Capacity Manual methodologies to calculate levels of service. For arterials LOS are based on average travel speeds along a defined corridor Table T-1 c shows the 42 defined street cor�idors, LOS standards and most recent calculated LOS. 19 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-1 c Auburn Corridor Level of Service • • � . . . . . .. . i �• 1 Auburn Wey NorCh 15th St NE Northerri City Limits_ D C!D _aY � _ �asf_Mai!i,St:-:..--....-=- TSth$t NE..__ .___.__.___ ._;- •E:---... _u_R�.._.�.. :2" AnbuPia,W_- � __^_—----- - 3 Aubum WaySouth - � EasfMain St. M SfSE � �Dv --F/E - 4 Au6um W ay 5outh.:--- :,"," " M;St'SE`-; ' `-� : ' ;, Eas'teFn Gity L"imits:-�_� " :�"D " " "':."C"," ' 5 M St.lHarvey Auburn W ay North East Main St. E C "'6" M-St.7Fta��:---��_'� F�st:Nlain S'�_.�_,._.�_ ""= �_6ur"ti_VYayScsutti_ -_r ___��__; -_p7_�� 7 Eve_rgreenWay LakelandHillsWay KerseyWay D Futu�e 8 37tH St NE/NW "'W,est;Valley Mwy. ' f Sf: NE ` � D. _ „ B/C, - 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Aubu�n Way`NoRlS F'* D '!D Aubum Ave/"A�'St�=�-'_,-SR�1_8��_�;= Southem�Ci�Limi3s== :_-�-�D- �___,';:,�v: 11 Main St W est Valley Hwy R St D C 12. 15tii_St SW_ ._�_ _... ________...:�!est Valley Hdi'Y___� C Sf SW ._ , _:.__�..._ --,--4�_�.____..._�� 13 C_St SW_ _ Ellings_on_ _ SR 18___ ___ ____ _ _. _D _ __CPE _ �14 West Valley Hwy" - -- - __�"_ , f�orttie`m City L'ttnits' -. lfitli Sfreet NW. _ _. , -- E _ .. BJG' . 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd, 108th Aye SE E E/B 16 RmS,t.lKeCsey Way:.r_.. ._�._... Auburn Way S:_�___.._. _ Oravetz,Road;m._._�._ v.__.�D'__�_ __��_� 17 Lake Tapps Parkway " -- - -- East Valley Hwy. 182nd Ave E- - - -D - -- B-- �,�._. 1;_,8 "A,��$fSWYNW/'"S"uS�idUl!:. .-=;:4tli St_Ml,W'_.._____ S`277t1i'Sf- __-.__._,_ ___Q-_-- ---Future-, 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd. Auburn Way North 132nd Ave SE E C/6 20,p'�C NVV1EmeraltlLLDowns Dr�--_5�277t1i St�"-"-.�,1'Stti St`NW�T-T �-Dl;._;_:AlB'— 21 I St NE __ 8 277th St_ _ , _____ __ Harvey Rd____ D AIB _ 22 '132nd 9ve�SE'-"_'"_�" "_" _ SE 28?rid St _ _ SE-312tfi Sf , _ �.- —p,_.�r --B, . 23 124th Ade SE SE 282nd St SE 320th. St D C 241, :#hAv.e;SE7SE:3�4tfiSt_�... 8thS2NE�:=�_m,._�.� 1_32nii�AyeSE_�,..�.. `_� Q'- ' �B1A'� 25 105th PI SE/SE 320thi Sf----- Lea Hill Road- - 124th Ave SE - D B 26 _L`akel�n�:N�ls Way SE_�=_. ,. L"ake T�pjis Parkway�'_ = Orabeti Rd- - _ . ; . . ' ;D ' __, ..�C/D _ 27 29[h St SEIRiverwalk Dr A 8treet SE Auburn W ay_South D _ C 281a8thA5e�S�JJ'f1�tfi�\ye.:SE"'-`5-277th:SY-',"_ '.",'�."` SE`304th5t'�'__�._.�p__u. �_ �;�- 29 49th St NW B St NW S 277th St D Future -- -- . _ _ _ . �30 .R 5tieet SE' ... . _..�. .. ._..__.;_ 8tii St;NE�:`�rv�.r"�4th;St�egt'S�`..'�.�, �� D�; ;.�BFG;�_'. 3T 3rd St SWlCross St" C Street Auburn Way South E E ,. .... . _.. . _ . . .f� __ � _� 321,7tliSfSE. , . ..__ . __ _---� A�St'_SE.:_ T...__.m._.:k.:_Aubu"m�WaySoyth__�.�:.�'---�Q.�� :.�8�•--� 33 41 st St SEIEllingson Rd____ _ A St_SE____ _ _ Western City Limits_ _ _ ___E__ _ . __ F_ ._ "34 Eakeland!Hiil§WaylOraveti� "'" EastVaileyHwjr: " ' ' Kersey�Way', E " A/B . ... . 35 West_Valley Hwy 15th Street NW Southern_City Limits E C/B 36 KerseyWay . , .. ,_ �revefzFtoad: ._�..._T,rSoyf#�grnrGity-timits._.... '_.�...�='_,.�..�A`_..�: 37 S_. 316th St�eeUTerrace D�ive " West Valle Hi hwa Westem Ci ' Limits - - D" - --" B- v s v �v .'—• -- - 38 5:29.6th,8treet/65tIi:Ave�:;_�.Wes�Valley.1i'��livuay�Westem City�imits:"�"� v_�:"D�� ;"-`8" ' 39 51 st Ave S.-- --- �- -y- -- S: 288th Street Peasley Canyon Rd D B �5:284tfiSYfeef:�`=_�_�.= 112thAve:SE'._� �. _ . 124th"A4eSE .., ." .., ._.. ,D` ;" , �B/A- _ ' 4T S'. 284th Street 124th Ave SE 132nd Ave SE D Future 42 R Sf:$ypass/BIacK piamondw . I(A Street 5E'.: -_�._„_ SR,�`$-T. .. _ _ _'',_ —__p__� �yFu`tTe.- * Split LOS indicates directional LOS in either the East-West or NoRh�South direclion. Otherwise,the LOS is the same in both directions. ** Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1000 seconds forthis corridorto meet the LOS Standard. 20 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Concurrency(Adequate Public Facilities) Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. In compliance with the GMA, adequate transportation system faciiities must be available within six years of the time of occupancy and use of new development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The Citys transportation facilities include projects totaling $129,871,717 Tables T-2, T-2A and T-2B show the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table T-3 shows, operating budget impacts of$851,092 are forecasted for transportation facilities during the six years 2016 —2021 21 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION -ARTERIAL STREET 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Tofal TIP# CanaCiN PrOie cls 1 A Street NW, Phase 1 Capital Costs 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Re�snua G2M5 - T2ific Impact Fees 350,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 O[her 2 AWS Pedestrian Imp. -0ogw ood St SE to Fir St SE Capital Costs 115,000 115,000 Punding Soumes: Unrestncted�Street �te�enue - Trafic Impact Fees 115,000 175,000 Other 5 M Streat Underpaa Capital Costs Long-Term Debt 131,233 130,654 730,080 129,500 728,920 128,350 778;737 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Re�enue - Grants - - Tratfic Mpacl Fees 131,233 130,654 130,080 129,500 128,920 128,350 778,737 PWIF Loan Other lOther Aaenciesl 6 S 272nd1277th St Corridor Cepacity &Non-Motorized Trail Improvemenffi Capital Costs 5,581,800 5,581,800 Fundirg Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue G2nts 4,000,000 - 4,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees 581,800 581,800 Other/Develooment Fundsl 1.000.000 1.000.000 10 F Street SE, 4M to AWS CaplWl Costs 400,000 250,000 1,800,000 2,450,000 FurWing Sources: UnrestActed Street Reeenue - Grents 320,000 200,000 1,440,000 1,960,000 Trafic Imoact Fees 80.000 50.000 360.000 490.000 11 M Street NE, E Main to 4th CaDltal Cos.ts 100,000 275,000 1,150,000 1,525,000 Fundirg Souroes: Unrestncted Streat Re�enue Grarrts 220,000 920.000 1,140,000 Traffic Imoact Fees 100 ODO 55 000 230 000 385.000 14 M St SE antl 12th St SE-Tretfic Slgnal Capi[al Costs 625,000 - 625,000 FurWinB Sources: Unrestncted Street Re�enue - GraMs 500,000 500,000 haiflc Impact Fees Other 125.000 125.000 15 8th Slreet NE Widenfng (Pike Street ro R Street NE) Capital Costs 450.000 1,000,000 1,450,000 Funding Sources: Unresttic[ad Street Re�enue Grarrts 360,000 800,000 7,160,000 REET 2 Traific Imoact Fees 90.000 200.000 280.000 22 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2(continued) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2079 20?A Tofal TIP#CaoadN Profecls: 17 Harvey Road 8 8th Street NE Intersection Improvements Lorg-Term Debt 86,010 85,383 85,200 84,800 84,400 84,400 570,193 Funding Sources� Unrestrictetl Street Re�enue - - Grants - PWiF ' ' Traffic Imoact Fees 86.010 85.383 85.200 84.800 84.400 84.400 510.193 18 8th Street NE and SE 104th St Intersectlon Improvements Capital Costs 5,000 - 5,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue 5,000 - 5,000 Grents - - REET2 - Traffic Imoact Fees 20 Auburn Way South and M Street SE Intersectlon Improvemenls CapRai Costs 5,000 - - 5,000 Funding Souices. Unrestricted Street Re�enue 5,000 5,000 GraMs Traffic Mitiaation Fces 23 A St SE Non�Jlotorized and Accea Improvemenis Capital Costs 69,029 - - 89,029 Funding Sources: Unrestrictetl Street Reeenue Grarits 89,029 - 89,OP9 Other 24 Atademy Drive MulU�lse 7rail Capital Costs - 425,000 425,000 850,000 FurMing Sou�ces: Unrestricted Street Re�enue 42,500 42,500 85,OU0 G2rRs 382,500 382,500 765,000 anar 25 46th Place S Realignment Capital Costs - 825,000 825,000 Funding Sources. Unrestnctetl Stree[Re�enue - - Grants - - 575,000 575,000 Trafiiclmoact Fees 250.000 250.000 33 BNSF 3rG Rall ExpanSon Roatlway Improvemenis Capital Costs 25,000 - 25,000 Funding Sou�ces: Unrestncted Street Re�enue 25,000 - - 25,000 Grants - - - Other 39 1241h Ave SE Cortidor &320tl�Intersection Improvemenfs Capital Costs 100,000 800,000 900,000 Funding Sources: UnresMcted Strcet Re�enue - - - _ GraMs 80,000 640,000 720,000 _Trafic Impact Fees 20.000 160 000 180.000 40 724th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 Capital Costs 500,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 4,100,000 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Re�enue - - - G2nts 400,000 880,000 2,500,0�0 3,780,000 Traffic Imoact Fees 100.000 220.000 320.000 23 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2(continued) 2015 2016 2017 2078 2079 2020 Toql TIP#Capsdri Proiects: 41 R Street Bypass Capital Costs - 500,000 500,000 Fundirg Sources: Unre"stncted Street Re�eriue - - - - GraMs - - - - Othe� 500.000 500 000 42 SE 3ZOth Street Corridor Imp�ovements Phase 7 Capttal Costs 250,000 4,000,000 - 4,250,000 Fundirg 3ources: Umestricted Street Re�enue - - - - - G2Ms 200,000 4,000,000 - q200,000 Treffic Imoact Fees 50.000 50.000 43 Auburn VYay South Cmridor Safety Improvements Capital Costs 2,333,108 - - - 2,333,108 Funtling Sources: Unrestricted Stieet Re�enue - - - - Grants 2,083,108 - - 2,093,108 Tratfic Imoact Fees 250.000 250.000 47 TratficManagementCenLerlmprovements Capital Costs 150,000 - 150,000 Funtling Sources: Unrestncted Stieet Reeenue - - - - - G2nts - - - _ Traffic Impact Fees 150.000 150.000 49 West Valley Highviay lmprovements(75th St NW to W Main 5U Capifal Costs 100,000 800,000 3,000,000 - - 3,700,000 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Re�nue Grants 480,000 2,400,000 2,680,000 haiAc Imoact Fees 100.000 120,000 600.000 -820.000. 51 WkeTappsParkwaylTSExpansion Capital Costs 900,000 - 900,000 Fundirg Sou�ces: Un2stricled Slreet Re�enue - GreMs 711,000 - - 717,000 TrafFc Imnact Fees 189.000 189.000 53 AWS and 72tl�Street SE InfersecUon Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 350,000 - - - 40Q000 Fundirg Souices: Unrestricted Street Re�nue - - Grants 250,000 - 250,000 Traific Imoact Fees� - 50.000 100.000 150.000 54 Kersey Way SWdy Capital Costs 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - Traffic Mitidation Fces 50.000 50.000 55 W Main Street Multlmodal Corridor and ITS Improvemenis Capital Costs 946,000 3,494,400 - - - 4,440,400 Funding Sources: Unrestrictetl Stieet Re�enue - Olher•Fund 105 85,410 314,510 - 399,920 haific Impact Fees 56,490 209,650 - 268,140 G2rrts 804.100 2,970,240 3.774.340 24 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2(continued) 2015 2076 2077 2016 2019 2020 Total TIP#CaoaciN Proiects: 58 Evergreen HeightsSafe Routesto School Improvements Capital Costs �90,000 563,000 4,620,000 5,973,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Rewnue NS,500 84,500 693,000 896,000 Grants 671,500 478,500 3,927,000 S,on,000 Other 58 Auburn Way South Conidor Improvements,Fir ST SE to Hemlock ST SE Capital Costs 20�,000 200,000 Funding Souices: Unrestricted Street Re�enue Grants - - Traffic Impact Fees 200,000 - - - 200,000 Other(Mfll 59 Auburn Ave NE 8 3rd St NE Pedestrlan 8 Acce$Improvemenfs Capital Costs 50,000 300,000 350,000 Funding Sources� Unrestricted Street Reeenue Grarrts - 250,000 - 250,000 Tratfic Imoact Fees 50.000 50.000 100.000 60 M Street SE Corridor(8th St SE to AWS) Capital Costs 1,900,000 4,750,000 - 6,650,000 Fundirg Sources� Unrestricted Street Reeenue - Grants 925,000 3,750,000 4,675,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 725,000 750,000 1,475,000 Other 250.000 25D.000 500.000 81 Auburn Way South Bypass-Riverwalk Dr to SR-19 at R St SE Capital Costs - - 6,000,000 6,000,000 Funding Souices: Unrestricted Street Re�enue G2Ms - - 4,800,000 4,800,000 O[her 1200.000 1.200.000 63 29fhStreetSE&RStreetSElntersectionlmprovements Capkal Costs 1,800,000 7,800,000 Funding Sources. UnresMcted Street Re�enue - - - GraMs - 7,300,000 1,300,000 REET2 - - - Traffic Imoact Fees 500.000 500.000 64 Lea Hill Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th PI SE) Capital Costs 150,000 2,450,000 10,000,000 12,600,000 Funtling Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - - G2nts - 7,950,000 8,000,000 9,950,000 Tra�ic Impact Fees 150,000 - 500,000 2,000,000 2,650,000 Other 85 Lea Hill Rtl Segment 2(105th Ave SE M 112th Ave SE) Capital Cqsts - 3,500,000 8,500,D00 12,D00,000 Fundirg Sources: Unrestricled Stree[Re�enue - - - - Grarrts - - 2,900,000 7100,000 70,000,000 haffic Impact Fees 600,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 aner 25 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities P[an TABLE T-2 (continued) 2015 2076 2017 2078 2019 2020 Total �CaoaaN Proiects: 86 Lea Hill Rd Segment 3(112tli Ave SE to 124th Ave SE) Capital Costs 1,000,000 3,ODD,000 - 4,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Stieet Re�enue - - - Grants 3,000,000 3,000,000 T21fic Impact Fees - 1,000,000 7,000,000 _9ther 89 I Street NE and 22ntl St NE Roundabout Safety Improvement Capital Costs 200,000 1,175,000 - 1,375,000 Fundirg Sou�ces: G2M5 160,000 940,000 1,100,000 Traific Impact Fees 40,000 235,000 - - - 275,000 Other 72 West Valley Higliway Improvements(SR-18 to 15th St SW) Capital Costs 100,000 - 500,000 2,500,000 - 3,100,�0 Funding Soufces: Grants - 400,000 2,000,000 - 2,400,000 Tra�ic Impact Fees 100,000 100,000 500,000 - - 700,000 Other Subtotal.CaoadN Prolecls: CapiplCosls 73,657780 1t,173,437 71,285,280 16,189,300 22,713,320 76,062,750 91,081,267 T�Non-CaoadN Proiects 3 Auburn Way Cmrldw Improvemenfs Capital Costs 876,700 3,00O,OOU - 3,818,700 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Stree[Re�enue 110,000 600,000 - 770,000 Grarrts - 708,700 2,400,000 3,706,700 Other 19 Aubum Way NorthNst Street NE Sfgual Improvemenis Capital Costs 50,000 550,000 800,000 Funding Sources: Unresftictetl Stfeet Re�enue 50,000 125,000 175,000 GraMs - 425,000 425,000 OtFier 21 Main Street Signal Upgradas Capital Costs 5,000 - 5,000 Funding Sources: UnrestriCled Street Re�enue 5,000 5,000 Grants - Other 27 A Street SE Safety Improvemen5 Sludy Capital Costs 5,000 5,000 Fu�ding Sou�ces: Unrestrictetl Street Re�enue 5,000 5,000 G2Ms - - Other 29 So.2771h,Wetland Mitlgation Capital Costs 25,000 - - 25,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue 25,000 - 25,00� Grants - - - anar, 26 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2(eontinued) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Toql TIP# Non-Caoaciri Proiects: 30 Citywide Pede�rian Accessibflity&Safety Program Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: UnresMcted Streef Re�enue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 G2nts - - - - Other 31 Citywide ArOerial Bicyde 8 Safety Improvements Capital Costs - 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Reeenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 300,000 Grants - - Other 38 37th St NW 8 B St NW Railroad Crossing SafeTy ImprovemenLs Capital Costs 5,000 5,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue 5,000 - - - - 5,000 Grams - - - Other - 44 A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements Capital Costs 150,000 - 150,000 Funding Sources: UnresMcted Street Re�enue - Grants 150,000 - 150,000 Other 45 Interurban Trailhead Improvements Capital Costs - - 210,OU0 210,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Re�enue - - - Grams 210 000 210 000 46 104N Ave SE 8 Green River Road Study Capital Costs S,OUO - 5,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Reeenue 5,000 - - 5,000 GraMs 48 A St SE 6 6th St SE Safety and Access Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Retienue - - - Grents - - Other 50.000 50 000 50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs Capital Costs - 100,000 200,000 200,000 - 500,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Reeenue 15,000 30,000 30,000 75,000 Grants _ 85.000 170 000 170 000 425 000 27 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2(continued) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2079 2020 Tofal T�NornCaoaaN Proieels: 62 AWS Streetscape Improvements(SR 78 to M St SE) Capital Costs 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 Funding Sources: Unrestr{cted Street Re�enue - - 200,000 240,OW - 400,000 G2Ms 1,750,000 2,6UO,U00 - 4,350,OU0 REET 2 67 Gtywfde 7reflic SignalsSaTety ImprovemeMs Capital Costs 5,000 - 5,000 Funtling Souices: Un2stricted Streel Re�enue 5,000 - - 5,000 Grents 68 37th St SE 8 A St SE Tratfie Signal Safety Improvement Capltal Costs 178,400 637,SOD - - 613,900 Funtling Sources: UnresMcted Street Re�enue 55,000 45,000 - - 700,000 G2M5 . . .. . 121,400 440.000 581,400 Other-Fund 105 152.500 152500 SuMotal.NonCaoadN Prolecls: Cepital Co'sts � 426,400 937.500 850.000 3,528,700 5,900,000 Z00,000 11,84],600 2075 2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 Tofal SUMMARY• CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 13,439,937 10,957400 71,070,000 15,975,000 22,500,000 15,&50,000 89,782,337 Non-Capacity Prqects 428.400 937,500 850,000 3,528.700 5.900.UD0 2U0,000 11,84P,BU0 Long-Tertn DeM 277243 276.03� 215.280 214.300 273.320 212.750 1.288.930 Total Costs 74,083,580 72,710,937 12,135,260 19,778,000 28,673,320 16,282,750 102,923,867 FUNDING SOURCES: UnresMctetl Street Re�ern�e 408,500 344,500 948.000 582,500 942,500 200,000 3,426,000 Grarrts 9,560,137 10,243,740 10,172,000 14,248,200 23,672,500 12,475,000 80,369,577 Trafic Impact Fees 2,929,533 1,055,687 1,015,280 4,514,300 3,748,320 1,887,750 15,150,870 halfit Mitigation Fces 50,000 - - - 50,000 REET2 ' ' ' _ ' PWTF Loan - - - Fund 105-Artenal St.Preserv. 65,410 487,010 - - - 552,420 Olhar(OtherAgencies) 1050000 - - 375.OW 250.000 1:700.000 3.375.000 TotalFuntling 14,083,SSD 12,110.937 72,735,280 19,718,OD0 28.673,320 76,282.750 702,923,887 2g City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FaciiRies Plan Six Year Capiql Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NVU) TIP # 1 Project No: c207a0 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Ingrid Gaub LOS Corridor ID# 18 Description: Construct a new mutti-lane arterial from 3rd Street NW to 14th Street NW This project will improve mobility and is tied to cortidor developmerit. tt is consisteM with the Compreherisive Plan and cortipletes a missirg link of a rSortFJsouth arterial cortidor The project length is approximatelythree-quarters of a mile. The City purchased rigM-of-wayfrom the northem property owner. lf the property develops,some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City(total cost was $251,000). Progress Summary• Pre-design was completed prior to 2007 Final design and ernironmeMal pertnitting were completed in 2011 and construction was completed in 2013. Major plarNings are scheduled in 2015 as part of the weUand monitoring that is required to continue ur�il 2023. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual mairrtenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,830. ACfIVIh/' 2014 YE 20t5 Year End FunCing Sources: Prior to 2074 ESUmate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Project Total UnresMcted Street Revenue 187,712 66,028 253,74� Grants- Secured (Fed,Stafe,Local) 6,562,702 6,562,702 Traff7c Impact Fees 956,198 101,672 350,000 25,0�0 7,407,870 Other Sources -MuPocare Contrrbution 382,817 382,817 Total Funtling Sources: 8,089,429 167,700 350,000 25,000 8,607129 Capital Expenditures: Deslgn 2,247.331 50,000 10,000 2,297,331 RigM o/ Way 621,341 821,341 Consfruc6on 5,020,757 167,900 300,000 75,000 5,488,45Z Total F�cpenditures: 8,089,429 167,700 350,000 25,000 8,607 129 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 20]0 2015-2020 Funtling Sourte5: Unrestncted Sfreet Revenue Grdnts- Secured (Fed,Stafe,Lceap Traff�c lmpacf Fees 25,00� 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 Othe�Somces -Multicare Contnbution Total Fundin9 Sources: 25,000 25,00.0 25,000 25,000 475,000 Capital F�[pendiWres: Design 10,000 70,000 10,000 10,000 100,000 Right W Way - Construction 15,000 15,000 15,000 75.000 375,000 Total Expenditures: 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 475,000 Grants /O[her Sou�ces: � - 29 City ofAuburn Draft Cgpital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Reveriue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South Pedestrian Imp. (Dogwood St SE to Fir St SE) TIP # 2 Project No: cp1118 Project Type: Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description: This project will construct pedestrian improvemeMs alorg Aubum Way South between Dogwood Stieet SE and Fir SVeet SE that are consisteM with WSDOTs SR-164 Rou[e Development Plan. The project includes sidewaik improvemerrts, access managemeM, a mid-block pedestrian crossing, construction of a U-tum wedge for @astb'ountl vehicles at Fir$treet SE and street lighting. Progress Summary• The City was awarded $100,000 in federal Tunding and $740,830 in sTate funding in May 2011 Other funding source is Muckleshoot Indian Tribe conbibution. Project design began in 2012. Design is e�ected be completed in 2014 and construction to be completed in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budg'et: -- This project will Fiave rio impact on fhe operatirg budget for street mairrtenance. Activity• � - - -� 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Pdor to 2014 Fstimaoe 2015,Budget 2016 Budget Projed Tofal Unrestnctetl,'Streef Revenue 6,446 92,554 - 99,000 GrarRs-Secmed(Feo',State,Lxa/J 211,454 629,376 - - 640,830 T2Kc Impacf Fees - 115,000 - 115,000 Other Sources(Muck leshoot) 330,000 330,000 Total Funding Sources: 217,900 1,051,930 115,000 - 7,384,830 Capital ExpendiNres: Design 217,900 71,930 289,830 Right of Way - - Construction 980,OOD 715,000 1,095,000 Tofal EzpendiWres: 217,900 7,051,930 115;000 - 7;384,830 Foiecasted Project Cost: ToUI 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources: --- --- -"- �- - Unresfncted Street Revanue - GraMs-Secured(Fed,State,Loca/) TraKc lmpact Fees 115,000 Other Sources(�ck leshoot) Tofal Funding Sources: - N5,000 Capital ExpendiWres Design - RigM o/ Way - Conshuction __115,000 Tofal Ezpentlilurea - 115,000 GraMs/Other Sources: 30 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilitles Plan Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan,20�5-2020 Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: M Street Underpass (3ri1 St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5 ProjectNo: c201a0 Project Type: CapacRy Project Manager Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 6 Description: Constrvction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M Street SE at tlie BNSF Stampede Pass 4acks. Progress Summary� 100%Design Drawings and rigM of way acquisi0on were completed in 2011 Construction started in early 2012 and will be complete during 20'14. Debt Service is scheduled each year through 2041 Future Impact on Operating Budget: The arnual mairrtenance cost Tor this projectis estimated to be $21,827 Activiry. 2014 YE 2075 Veai En'U FunOing Sources: Prfor to 2014 Estimate 2075 Butlget 2016 Butlget Prqeet Tofal UnrestActetl Stieet Revenue t63,958 163,958 Giants-Secured(Fed,State,Local) 8,599,948 8,599,948 REET2 1,140,000 7,740,000 TreNrc Impect Fees (Construcbon) 4,255,428 4,255,428 Tre/fic Impact Fees (Oebt Service) 38,640 127 490 131,233 130,654 297,363 Trafhc Mlbgation Fees 660,000 660.000 PWTFL�30 years) 3,044,491 215,500 3,259,991 OtherSources(OtherAgencies)' 3,090,5'I4 3.090.574 Tofal Funtltng Sources: 20.992,979 342.980 t37.233 130.6% 21.467.202 Gpital Expendi[ures: Design 2.688,924 2,688,924 Right ol Way 3,358,443 3,358,443 Consbuction '14.906,972 215,500 75.'122,472 PWTFL Debf Service 38,640 127,490 '137,233 130,654 297,363 Total Expentlitures 20.982.879 342.990 131.233 130.654 21.467.202 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2077 2018 2018 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources: ' ' Unrestnctetl S1reeP Revenue _ Grants-Secured(Fetl,Sta[e,Locel) _ REET2 _ Tre((ic Impact Fees (Consfn�ction) Traf(ic lmpact Fees (Debt Service) 130.080 �29,500 128,920 128,350 778,737 Tral/ic Mrti9ation Fees PWTFL(30 ysars) Ot/rerSources(OtlrerAgencles)' Total FunOing Sourcea 730,080 729,500 126,920 128,350 778,737 Gpibl Ezpenditures: Des�gn _ Wght o/ Way COIlS[rtlGl%W1 PWTFL Debt Service 130,080 129,500 t28,920 128,350 �78,737 Tofal EzpentliWres: 13D,080 729,500 128,920 728,350 778,737 GreMs/Other Sources� Other Agencies a�e King County Metro Sewer, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, and BNSF Railway 31 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan i4RTERIAL STREET FUND (102) caP�wi Feci�nies Pian Six Year CaPital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project TiUe: S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacky& Non-Motorized Trail Improvement TIP # 6 Project No: c222a0 STIP►A AUB-42 ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 15 Desoription: � - -� � This project inc,ludes preliminary engineering, design, rigM-of-way acqLisition and construction of major widehing on S 277th Street, including the addition of three lanes, one westbound and iwn eastbound,a Class 1 trail, and storm improvemeMs. The project is approwmately0.9 miles long. Progress Summary� Staff is coordinating with the City of Kent and Kirig CouMy to complete anne�iation of the roaHway irrto the Ci_ty of Autium. Robertson Properties Group is participating in tivs project and is dedicating all necessary roadway frdrrtage M the City. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The anrwal mairKenance cosis for this project is estimated to be $27,250. Activity• 2014 YE 2075 Year Entl Funtling Sources: Prlor l0 2014 F�lmata 2015 Budget 2076 Budget Pro�ect Total UnresMctetlSheet Revenue 33,011 357,590 39D,601 G2nfs- Secured State 90,503 930,197 4,000,000 5,020,700 Treff'�c Impact Fees 58t,800 581,800 Other (Development Funtls)` 1,000,000 1,000,000 Other 7otal Funtling Sources: �23,514 1,287,787 5,587,800 6,993,1D7 Capifal ExPendiWres: Design 723,514 1,267 787 1,391,301 Right W Way 20,000 20,000 Consfruction 5,561,800 5,581,800 Total Expenditures: 123,574 7.287.787 5.567.800 6,993.107 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2078 2019 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources: Un2stncted Straet Revenue G2nts- Secured State 4,000,000 T�all'ro Impac[ Fees 581,800 Other (Development Funds)' 1,000,000 Other Total Funding Sources: 5,561,800 Capttal ExpendiWres: Des/gn - Right ol Way - ConsWcNon 5,581,800 Total F�cPendlWres: - 5,587;SOr GrarRs /Other Sources: 32 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facili[ies Plan Six Year Capkal Facllities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvertients (Downtown to Les Gove) TIP # 10 Project No: Cp0911 Project 7ype: Capaci[y, Non-Motorized Project Maroger TBD LOS Corridor ID# WA Description: The F St SE project includes pavemeM rehabilihation,iretallation of ciabs, gulters, bike lanes, sidewalks,ADA improvemeMs,utility undergrounding, LED street IigMing, new two way ceMer left turrrlane,crash attenuation at the supports for tYie BNSF railroad bridge, initiation of Aubum Staff Bike share pilot program,wayfirxling signage and a "Bicycle Boulevard"designabon of roadway connections between Aubum City Hall and the Les Go�re Park Campus. This project improves mobility and safety al6ng the corridor and will complete a gap in the non-motorized network beriveen Aubwn's Dowrrtown and the Les Go�e Community Campus.The major infrastructure improvemerrts are approidmately 0.3 miles bng and the "Bicycle Boulevard"improvemerrts are just o�er a mile long. Progress Summary: Preliminary design and swrey wvrk evas completed in 2009. Federal grarrt was secured in 2014 for Design ard ROW phases. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this projed is estimated to be $4,100. Activity: 2074 YE ?A15 Year End Funding Sources PNor Oo 20t4 Esdmate 2015 Budget 2016 Budgat Proje�t Total UnresMcteU Sf�eef Revenue Granfs- Securetlfederal 320,000 200,000 320,000 REET _ TraH7c Impact Fees 7,620 80,000 50,000 87,620 Other Tofal Funding Sources: 7,820 400,000 250,000 407,620 Capipl Expendinlres: Design 7,620 400.000 200.000 607.620 Right W Way 5p,ppp COIISfNCIkN1 Tobl F�cpenAiWres: 7,630 - 400.ppp 250,000 4p7.620 Forecasted�Project Cost: Tota I 2077 2078 T018 2020 20152020 FunEing Sources - Unrestricted Street Reirenue _ Gianfs- Unsecured(Fed) 1,440,000 1,960,000 REET Tral/ic Impact Fees 360,000 q9p,ppp Othei Total Funding Sources: 7,800,000 - 2,450,000 Capifal FxpendiNres: Deslgn 600.000 Poght ol Way 50,000 Cwrstmction 1,800,000 1,800,000 Tofel F�cpenditures: 1,800,000 2,450,000 Grarrts /6ther Sources: 33 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan - - ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facnities Plan Slx Year Capital Faellltles Plan, 2015-2040 Speclal Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP # 11 Project No: asbdl2 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5 Description: This project will construct a four-lane street section that includes sidewalks, gulters, landscaping and sVeetlighfs on M St NE,between sou�of E Main St and 4th St NE. Progress Summary• Pre-design will be cortipleted durirg 2015 to refine project scope, alig"nment, and cost. Future Irtip'act on Operating Budget: The annual mair�enance cost forthis project is estimated to be$1,500. Activity: 2074 YE 2075 Year End FunAing Sources Pdor tn 2010 Eslimaffi 2015 Budget 2016 Budgat ProJect Total Unrestricted Sheef Revenue Grants- Unsecured(Fed,Stete,Local) - REET - 7reHic Impact Fees 100,000 100,000 OtFrer Tofal Funding Sources: 700,000 � 700,000� Capital ExpentllWres Design - 100.000 - 100.000 Right o/ Way - - ConstNct7on Toml ExpendiWres - 700,000 - 100,000 ForeoasteH Project Cost: Totel 2017 2078 2019 2020____ _ 20752020, _ Funding Sources: � �_ �-�� _ Unrestricted St�eet Re�snue - - Grants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Loca/) 220,000 920,000 - 1,140,000 REET - Trallic Impetf fees 55.000 230,000 385,000 Ofher Total Funding Sourcex 275,000 1,750,000 - 7,525,000 Capital Expentlltures Design 75,000 175,000 R/ght o/ Way 200,000 200,000 Constructlon 1,150,000 1,150,000 Total Expendltures: 275,000 7,750,000 1�,525,00� Grams /Other Sources: 34 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year CapiWl Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SEl12th Street SE Traffic Signal T1P # 14 Projed No: cpx�oa Project Type: IMersectan Improvement, Capacky Project Manager. TBD LOS Cwridor ID# 11 Description: This project includes the design, rigM-of-way acquisition and corutruction of a new lraffic sigrnal. Progress Summary: Future Impad on Opereting Budget: The anmial mairrtenance cost fur ihis project is estimated to be$6,600. Activity 2014 YE 2015 Vear End Funding Sources: Prlor ro 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget Y076 Budget Project Total Unrestncted Sneet Rerenue - Gwnts- Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Locaq ' REET 2 ' Trd/lic Impact Fees ' Other- Developer • Tofal Funding Souroes: _ CaDltal Expenditures: Design • Righf o/ Way • COIISfNCt1011 � Total ExpenGltures Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2079 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources: UnresMcfed Street Revanue Grants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Loca!) 500,000 500,000 REET 2 irallic Impecf Fees Other- �evelqoer 125,000 125.000 Total Fundlnp Sources: 625,000 625,OOD Capifal ExpendlWms: Design 75,000 75,000 Right o/ Way Sp,Opp 5p,ppp COIIS�NCl/O� $QQ,QQQ �,� Total EzpendiWres: 625,000 625,000 Grarrts /Other Sources: 35 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan - — - --= -- -_- - ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capi[al Facilities Plan Six Year Capkal.Facilities Plan,20152020 ._ _ ___ __ _. Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: 8th Strcet NE Wldening (Pike St NE to R St NE) TIP # 15 Project No: cp�000c ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager• TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description: Widen Sth Street NE ro eMerid the five-lane cross-section which currently epsts to the west of Pike St f� to R St NE by providing an additional traoel lane alorg the soiAh side of the roadway.TYtis is a plannirg le�l cost estimate. Progress Summary: Future Impa¢t on Operatlng Budget: "(Yds project will have ro impad on the operatlng budgetfor street mairrtenarxe. Activity 2014 YE 2015 Year End Fundfng Sourca8: Prlor b 2014 EstlmaU 2075 Budget 2078 Butlget Project Total UniesMcted S[reet Revenue - Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - REET - Trelfic /mpact Fees - Other Tofal Funding Sources: - - - Gpftal Expendllures: Deslgn R/ght W Wey Construct/on Total F�cpendlWres: - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019_ 2020 . __2015-2020_ Funding Sources � � UnrestActetl Street Re�snue - G2M5- Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Loca/) 360,000 800,000 - 1,160,000 REET TraN�c Impact Feas 90,000 200,000 - 290,000 Other Total Funtling Sources: d50,000 1,000,000 - 1,450,000 Capltel EcpendlN'ea Deslgn 200.000 200.000 RigM W Way 250,000 250�000 ConSWCtlon 1.000,000 1.000.000 Total EzpendiWres 450,000 1.000,000 - 7:450.00� Grarrts !Other Sources: 36 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capkal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2015-2020 Spaela)Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: Harvey Rd NE/Sth St NE Intersection Improvements TIP # 17 ProJect No: cp0611 ProjectType: Capacity ProJectManager None LOS Corridor ID# 5,19 De§cription: Add one eastboimd ttvough/ngM Nrtrlane on Bth St NE to ttie west of Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traflic chamelimtion to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane v.vll retluce traffic delays and que�ring at tlie irrtersection of Han.ey Rd ard 8th St NE in all directiors. This projectwill recorstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to BM St NE, a segmerrt of roadway appmbmately 0.3 miles lorg Hith a fo��ane crosssection. Tha recorefructlon will add2ss the ebstlng poor paeemerrt condition and fill in arry gaps in the sidewalk network. Progress Summary: Projectwas completed in 2010. Orgoing budget is tor Public Works Trusf Furxl Loan debt paymeMs scheduled through 2028. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This projectwill ha�.ero impacton ihe operatingbudgetfor 57eetmaintenance. Activiry: 2016 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources Prior ro 2016 Estlmato 2015 Budget 2076 Budget ProJect Tofal UnresMc/etl Sheet Revenue GreMs-Secured(Fed,Stete,Local) Trelfic Impact Fees (Debt Service) 349,000 86,500 86,010 85,383 52t,510 Traffic lmpect Frees 204,500 204,500 PWTF 1,521,300 1 527300 Tobl Funding Sourees: 2,080,800 88,500 86,0�0 85,383 2,253,310 Capibl Expendihrtea Design 327.500 327.500 7?i9M d WeY 200.400 200.400 ConsWction 1.203.900 1203.900 Lorrg Teim Oebf PWTF 349.000 88,500 86,010 85.383 527,570 Tofal Expendltures 2,080,800 88,500 86,070 85,383 2,253,370 Forecasted PFojeet Cost: Total 2017 2078 2018 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sou�ces: - Un2sMctetl S[reet Revenue Grants-Secured(Fetl,State,Loca/) ha7/ic/mpact Fees (Oebt Service) 85,200 84,800 84,400 84,400 510,193 7raK�c lmpact Fees PWTF Total Funtling Sources: 85,200 84,800 84,40D 84,400 510,193 Gpital FspendlWrea Desgn Righf d Wey _ COIISfNG�l0l1 _ Long Term Debt PWTF 85.200 84.800 q4.400 84.4pp 570,193 Total ExpendlWres 85,200 84,800 84,400 84,400 570,793 Grznts/Other Sources� I 37 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facili[ies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Speclal Revenue Fund Pmject TiUe: 8th St NEI104th Ave SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 18 Project No: cp1104 STIP# AUB-40 ProJect Type: IrMersectlon ImprovemeM, Capacky Project Manager Matt larson LOS Corridor ID# 19 Descriptioii: Tlvs project includes the design, rightof-way acpuisition ard constniction of irrtersection improvements including a Vaific signal with accdmmodationfor an eastbourd irtirn movemerrt. Progress Summary• The design tiegan in 2011 with corutruction scheduled for 2014. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost Tor this project is estimated to be $6,600. Activity: 2010 VE 2075 Year End Funtling Sources: Prbr ro 2016 Estlmate 2015 Butlget____ 2016 BUCBet Profact Total Unrastncted Street Revenue 8,600 148,400 5,000 162,000 Grants- Secuied(Fed,State,Local) 40,816 59,184 100.000 REET2 2,fi08 119,000 - 721,608 Traffic Impact Fees Other (Red/IexJ Total Funding Sourcas: 52,024 328,5&L 5,000 383,608 Capital ExpendiWres: Design 50.546 38.000 - 86,546 Right ol Way 1,478 1.478 Constn�ct/on 288,584 5,000 293,584 Tofal Ex�pendiNres: 52,02d 326,566 5,000 - 383;608" Foieoasted Prqect Cost: Totel 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: UnresMcted Sheet Revenue 5,000 Grants- Secured(Fed,State,Local) REET2 - TraNic Impacf Fees Other(Redllex) Total Funding Sources - - - 5.000 Capital ExpendiWres Des�9n - RigM ol WaY ' COIISfNCfJWI Total 6cpendlturos: - - Grerrts /Olher Swrces: 38 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capipl Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Reyenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South/M St SE IMersection Improvements TIP # 20 Project No: cp1024 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager Jatob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 3,4 Description: TFus project is the first phase of improvemeMs at the Aubum Way South/M St SE irrtersection. The project will construct new westbound to northbound rigM-tum pockets,improved tirrrng radius on the northeast comer, realignmerrt of the westbound 17th St SE approach to Aubum Way South, IigMirg improvemeMs,related traffc signal modifications arxl right of way abquisition. Progress Summary� Pre-design was completed in 2012. Final design and rigM-of-way acquisition began in 2013 and consWction is planned for 2014. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street mairrtenance. Activity. � - 2014 YE 4015 Year End Funding Sources Prior to 2014 Estlmate 2015 8udget 2076 Budget Project Total UnrestnctedStreet Revenue 38,815 61,185 5,000 105,000 G2nts- Secured(Fed,State,Lxal) 59,060 390,920 450,000 irelfic Impacf Fees 125,000 125,000 Tre(/ic lvbtigation Funds 37,368 112,632 150,000 Ofher Total Funding Sources 135,2W 689,737 5,000 830,000 Capitel F�cpentliture5: Design 121,174 163,000 163,000 Right o/ Way 14,089 85,737 99,826 ConSINCIIon 447,000 S.00O 446,000 Toqi ficpenditures: 735,2W 689,737 5,000 830,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Fundfng Sources: UrnesMcted Street Rewnue 5,000 Grants- Secured(Fed,State,Local) _ Trallic Impact Fees TraH�c hfitlgat/on Funds _ Other Total Funding Sour�es 5,000 Capifat Expenditures Des�gn Poght ol Way Constiuction Tofal F�cpendiares: _ Grants /Other Souroes: 39 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capita� Faci�itie"s P�an Six Year Capitai FacilRies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Pmject Title: A Street SE Non-Motoriied and Access Improvements TIP # 23 Project No: asbd03 Project Type: Class 1 Trail (Capacity) Project Manager Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# N/A Description: Preliminary design of improvemerrts to A Street SE behveen the Wtute Riv�er Bridge and 41st S1reet SE, including a signalized pedestrian crossing and access managemerrt including consolidation of commercial driveways. Progress Summary• Remainirg grant furds from the BNSF/E Valley Highway Pedestrian Underpass project�are in the process of being reprogrammed to tltis project. Preliminary design work has not begun. E�enditures prior to 2013 were for project c229a0. FuWre Impact on Opereting Budget: The armual maiMenance cost for tivs project is estlmated to be $2,500. Actjvity 2014 YE 2075 Year Entl Funtling Sourcex Prior to 2074 Estimate 2015 ButlBet 2016 Budget ProJect Tofal UnresMcted Streef Revenue - - - -- -53,900 � � 53,900� G2nts- SecureC(FeA,State,Loca/) 170,400 89,029 259,429 REET - Tra((ic Impxt Fees Other Total Funtltng Sourcex 224,300 89,029 313,329 Capital Expendittires: Deslgn 224,300 89,029 - 313,329 RigM of Way Construction Total Expendidires: 2Z4,300 89,029 313,329 �Forecasted Project Co§t: 7om1 2017 2018 2079 20TA 2015-2020 Funding Sources: UnresMcted Street Rerenue - Grents- Secmeo'(Fed,State,Locaq 89,029 REET - T2Nic lmpact Fees Ofhe� (O[her Agenc/es)' Tofal Funding Sources: 89,029 Capital ExpentliWres: Design 89,029 Righf of Way - Constiuction Toml Expenditures: 89,02� Grants /Other Souices: Expenditures pnor to 2013 were fur p�oject c229a0 40 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital FacllRies Plan, 20152020 Spebial Revenue Fund Project TiUe: Academy Drive Muki-Use Trail TIP # 24 Project No: Cp�000c Project Type: Class 1 Trail (Capacity) Project Manager TBD LOS Corr'idor ID# N/A Description: This project will ise ebsting Academy Dr rigM-of-wayto create a mutti-use trail on between the Green River Rd and Aubum Way S. Progress Summary: Fulure Impact on Operating Budget: The arnual maintenance cost foY tFds project is estimated to be $5,000. Activity: - 201d YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources PAor b 2014 Eatlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Project 7ote1 UnrestAcfed St�eet Revenue Grdrrts- Unsecured(Fed,State.Lxal) REET _ T2flic Impacf Fees Ofher Sources ToUI Funding So�rces: Capimt ExpendiWres Design R/ght oi Way Construction Total Expenditures: _ Forecasted Project Cost: 7ofal 2017 _2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Saurces UnresWcted Street Revenue 42,500 42,500 85,00p Grarrts- Unsecured(Fed,State,LocaQ 382,500 382,500 765,000 REET _ TraHic Impact Fees Othar Somces Total Funding Sources 425,000 425,000 850,000 Capital Ezpentlitures: Design 100,000 700,000 Right o/ Way consrrucrion azs.000 azs,000 �so.000 Tofel FspendiWres: - 425,OOD 425,000 - 850,000 Grams /Other Sources: 41 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capifal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilitfes Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 46th Place S Realignment TIP # 25 Project No: cp�ooc Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# N!A Description: The project will realign 46th Place S to the south of S 321st Street. The realignmerrtwill mo�e the 46fh Place S intersaction with S 321st Street approximately 350 feet to the east of the curerR location.This will create lwv T-irrtersections(44th Avenue S aM 46th Place S) in place of the existirg four-leg irdersection.The ewsting 46th Place S will be dead-ended to the south of S 321st SVeet. The projec[ will improve safety and Vaffic operations at the intersections. Progress Suiiimary• � RigM-of-wayfor the realigned roadwaywill be dedicated as part of an adjacerK development project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,750. ActNity: 2014 YE 2015 Year Enil FunCing Sources Prlor to 2014 EstimaU 2015 Butlget 2916 Budpet ProJect Total Un2sMcted Street Revenue Grants- Urtsecu�ed,(Fed,State,Locaq - REET T2fflc Impact Fees Other Sou2es Tofal Funding Sources - - Capital Ezpendiwres Deslgn R/gM W Way ConSINCIIon Tofel Expenditiires: Forecasted Project Cost: Tolal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources UrvesMcted Street Re�nue - - - Grarrts- Unsecurad(Fed,Stafe,Local) 575,000 575,000 REET - Trelllc Impact Fees 250,000 250,000 Other Soulces Toml Funding Sourcex 625,000 825,000 CePital Ex{ienditures: Design 125,000 125,000 Right o/ Way 25,000 25,000 Construction 675,000 675,000 Total Expenditures - - 825,000 825,000 G2nts /Olher Sou�ces: 42 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (702) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: BNSF 3rd Rafl Expansion Roadway Improvements TiP # 33 Project No: asbd06 ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 13, 18 Descriptan: T}ds project will design and consVuct roadway improvemerrts associated with the construction of the 3rd rail lire by BNSF Pr'ogress Summary• Future Impad on Oparating Budget: This project will have no impacl on the operating budget for street maintenance. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sourees: Prlor tu 2074 Estlmafe 2015 Budget 2016 Budget ProJect Total Unrestdcted Street Revenue 25,000 25,000 Grants- Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) _ REET TraNlc Impact Fees Ofher Sources Total Funding Sources: 25,000 -25,000 CapHai Expenditurex Design 5,000 5,000 Rlght o/ Way - Con3tn�Ctlon 20,000 20,000 Total ExpendiNres: 25,000 25,000 Forecasted Projeet Cost: Tofal 2077 2018 2078 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources: - UnrasMcted Street Revenue 25,000 Grants- Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) _ REET _ Tralbc /mpact Fees OMrer Sourcas Toml Funding Sources: - - 25,000 Capipl ExpentliNrea I7es/gn 5.000 Right o/ Way ConSINCIion ZO.000 Total ErzPendiWres 25.000 G2M5 !Other Sources: 43 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Cap(tal Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corrido► & 320th IMersection Improvements TIP # 39 Project No: cp�000c Pmject Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25 Descriptlon: This project will fund the design, rigM-of-way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the signatized SE 320th St and 124th Aee SE intersection. trnpro�ements include constructing bike lanes, sidewalks, dual southboimd Ie8-tum lanes into Green River Commimity College, arxf URelligerR Transportation System impm�emerds. The intersection is located at the main enhance to Green River Commurrity College and will require additional orFsite impro�emerds to be constructeC by Green Rieer Commurrity College. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will ha�.e no impac[on tlie operating budget for street maiMenance. Activky. 2074 YE 20'IS Year End Funding Sourtex PAor to Z014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Pro�ect Tofal Unrestncted Street Rewnue - - - Grants-Unsecmed(Fed,Stefe,Locap - - - TrsHic/mpacf Fees - - - Other Total FunCing Sourees: • • - Capifal Expendltures Design - Rlght oi Way - - - C0/iS�NCt1011 Total ExpendlStires: Forecasted ProJect Cost: Toml 2077 2078 2019 2020 20152020 FundingSourws: - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- - - UnresMcted Street Revenue - - Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Locap 80,000 640,000 - 720,000 TraNic Impact Fees 20,000 160,000 - 180,000 Other 7ofal Funtling Sourees: 100,000 800,000 - 900,000 Capiql ExpendiWrex Design - 700,000 - 700,000 Right of Way - 50,U00 - 50,000 consrn,sta� �so.000 - �so.000 Total ExpendiWres: - 100,000 800,000 900,000 Grarits/Other Sources: � City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan I Six Year CapiWl FaciliUes Plan, 2075-Y020 Special Revenue Fund Project TiUe: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements - Phase 2 TIP # 40 Project No: asbd0l Project Type: Capacky Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID� 23 Description: Tlus project will fund the design, rightof-way acquisition, and consiruction of a lour-lane section with bicy�le and pedestrian facilities on 124th Aue SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th St,and improvemerRs to the signaiized intersection of SE 312fh St and 124th Ave SE (incfudirg adding bike lanes, dual westbourxl left-tum lanes, dual soufhbound fhrougF�lanes, a rrorthbound rigM-tum pocket, ffS improvemerRs, and pedestrian safety improvements). Progress Summary: Phase 1 improvemerds between SE 318th and SE 316th were completed by GRCC in 2012. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Activity. 20�4 YE 2015 Year Entl Funtling Sources Prior to 7A14 EsEmate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget_ _Project Tofal Unrestncted Street Revenue _ _ _ _ Grants-Unsecured Fede21 400,000 680,000 400,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 Y10,000 100,000 Ofhei Tofal FunA'ing Sources 500,000 7,100,000 500,000 Capltal ExpendiWres Design - SOp,000 500,000 Right W Way - 1,100,000 Construction Total FxpenAiWres 500,000 1,100,000 500,000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: To181 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcex Unrestnctetl Street Revenue - - ' #REF! _ _ _ Grants-Unsecured Federa/ 2,500,000 3,7gp,ppp Trefflc Impact Fees - 320,000 Other Toml Funding Sources: 2,500,000 - 4,100,000 Capital ExpendlWres: Design - 500,000 Right d Way �,jpp,ppp Construchon 2,SOD.00D 2.500.000 Tofal FxpendiWres: 2,SOU,000 - 4,100,000 G2nts/Other Soumes: 45 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FaciliNes Plar Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 201Y2020 Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: R Street Bypass(M Street SE to SR-18) 'I� # 4� Project No: cp�oacx Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Desoriptlon: This project will complete the design and construction of the Bypass Rd, an arterial connection between M Street and Aubum Black Diamond Road, parallelirg the rail line. The project will provide an arterial oonrrection from the newly constructed M Street Underpass to the Aubum Black Diamond Road irrterchange with SR-18 to keep both vehicular and freigM traffic out of residential neighborhoods abng R SVeet SE rorth of the Stampede Pass tine. The arterial conrrection may also provide opporhmities for partriering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe as they redevelop ttie Miles Pit area and as more definitive plans are developed for a potenlial new WSDOT irRerchange on SR-18 in the vicirity of the project. Progress Summary• Future linpact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. �� Activity -- - 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding$ources P.rtor fo 2014 F9lmate 2015 Butl et 2016 Butl et Projett Totai Unrestdcfed Stieet Revenue - " - '"" " " - - - � - ---- - - - —--_ - Grants- Secured(Fed,Slate,LocalJ - REET - - TraHlc Impact Fees - - Other Sowces (De�rolopment) - Toml Funding Sources: - - - Capitel Expen0ltures: Design ' ' Right ol Way - r.0/IS�NCI10lI Tofal Expendlwres - Forecasted ProJect Cost: ropl 2017 20t8 2019 2020 2075-ZOZO Funding Sourma: UnresMcted Street Revenue - Grenfs- Secured(Fed,State,Local) - REET - Trafl/c Impact Fees Other Sources (DeWlopment) 500,000 500,000 Toml Funding Sources: 500,000 -500,000 Capltal 6pendituros: Desfgn 500.000 SOU,000 RfgM ol Way - CO/lSINCt/OII Toml Expendiwrea - 500,000 W0,000 GraMs /Other Sourcw: � 46 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: SE 320th Street Cor�idor Improvements Phase 1 TIP # 42 Pmject No: cpxxxx ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 25 Description: SE 320th St is a primary route servirg Green River Community College and adjacerrt neighborhoods.There are very high volumes of pedestrians,bicyclists, and transit utiliang the corridor This project will fund the design, rigM-of-way acquisition, arxl construction of norrmotorized roadway and safety imprdvemeMs iriclutlirig a roundabout at 116th Ave SE, adding bicycle lanes, sidewalks,and street IigMing between 122nd Ave SE and 116th Ave SE. Projed length is appropmately 45 miles. Progress Summary: - GRCC completed the design and constniction for the segmerrt belween 124th Ave SE and 122nd Ave SE in 2013. Corridor design is scheduled to start in 2015. Constniction is planned for 2017 Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for sVeet maiMenar�e. Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget ProJect 7ota1 Unrestrlcted St2et Revenue - " Grants- Unsecured Federal 640,000 200,000 4,000,000 840,000 Traffic Impact Fees 760,000 50,000 270,000 PWTFL - Other Tofal Funding Sources: 800,000 250,000 6,000,000 1,050,000 Capipl ErzpendiWres: Design 800,000 800,000 Right o/ Way 250,000 250,000 Construcfion 4,000,000 Total ErzpendiWres: 800,000 250,000 4,000,000 1,050,000 Forecasteii Project Cost: Tota I 2017 2018 2019 2020 207&YOYO Funtling Sourrns Un2stncfed Street Revenue _ Grants- Unsecuiad Federa/ 4,200,000 TraH�c Impact Fees 50,000 PWTFL _ Other Toql Funding Sources: 4,250,000 Capipl Expenditures: Deslgn Righ! o( Way 250,000 Constmct�on _ 4,000,000 Total Ezpenditures: 4,250,000 G2rrts I Other Sources: 47 City ofAu.burn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project TiUe: Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety Improvements TIP # 43 Projeot No: cp1218 STIP# AUB-44 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description: Tfus project will improve access managemert,including U-tums,upgrade transit stops and street Iighting,widen W accommodate turrrlanes and pedestrian ard bicycle facilities,upgrade pavemerrt markings,iretall pedesVian signals and audible pedestrian push buttons,and upgrade traffc signals to ctiarge tlie pha:sing anil to improve tha visibilityof the signal Fieads. Progress Summary• � Grarrt fuidirig was awarded in 2012 and dces not require a local match. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have ra impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Activity• 2014 YE 2015 Yeai End Funding Sources Prlor to 2014 Fstimate 2075 Budget 2016 Budget ProJect Totsl Unrestncted Street Revenue 2,684 2,684 Grants- Secured(Fed,State,Locap 2,738 247,262 2,083,108 2,333,108 TreH'rc Impact Fees 250,000 250,000 PWTFL Other Total Funding Sources: 5,422 247,262 2,333,108 2,585,792 Capifal Expendi[ures: Des�gn 5,422 239,762 93,000 338,184 R�ght o/ Way 7.500 62,000 89.500 Construction 2.178,108 2,178,108 Total Expentlltures: 5,422 7A7,262 2,333,108 2,585,792 Forecasted Prqect Cost: � Total 201T 2018 '2019 2020 20152020 Fundin9 Sources: Uruastr/cfed Street Revanue - Grants- Secuietl(Fed,State.Local) 2,083,108 Traff'�c Impact Fees 250,000 PWTFL Othei Total Funding Sources: - 2,333,108 Capital F�cpendiWres: Des/gn 93,000 Righf of Way 62,000 r.0(IS�2C�IW1 2.�78�� Toql 6cpendltures: � � — 2.333;108 Grairts 7 Other�Souices: 48 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faeilities Plan Six Year Capifal Facflkies Plan,20152020 Speefal Revenue Fund Project Title: Traffic RAanagement Center Improvements TiP # 47 Project No: asbd'10 Projact Type: Capaeity, ITS Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# WA Description: The rapid growtli of the City traffic signal arq trrtelligerrt Transportation Systems irttrastruchue has seeerey strained the capacityand reliabilityof the existing network processirg capabilities.This projectwill implementnetwork comm�aricatiore, software,�ideo,and physical impro�meMs to the T2ffic Marogemerrt Cerrter which will improee tlie network data processing speed,reliability, and 2durWancy impro�.ing the Citys abilityto maroge the traruportation system and respord to emergencies.AddiGonally,tliese impro�.emerrt�vill allow hifo�rmation& Teclmology staff h� isolate tlie Traffic Management data processing demands from tlie Citys general facility securiry data processing demands resulting in impro�emer�ts to both processes. Prog�ess Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is rq impactM the streetmairitenanbe budget. Activity: 20�4 VE 2075 Veer Entl Funding Sources: Prlor to 2014 Estlmate 2075 Budget 20'16 ButlBet Brofeet Total Unrasfncted Stiaet Revenue _ Grants-Secured(Fed,Stete,Loce/) Tref(ic Impect Fees �5p,ppp isp,ppp PWTFL Other Total Fun0ing Sourcec �50.000 150,000 Capifal Expentliturec �esign 25,000 25,000 R1Aht d Wey Construc7/on t25,000 125,000 7obl ExpandiNrec t50.o00 150.000 Forecasted Project Cost: Toml 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: Urnestrtcted Streef Reyenue _ Grants-Securad(Fed,Sfafe,Locaq TraNrc/mpact Fees 750,000 PWTFL _ _ Other To}al Funding Sourpa: 150,000 Capltal Expendituras Dasi9� 25.000 Right W Wey Constructlon 125,000 Total Expentlitures: 750.000 G2nts/Olher Sou�ces: 49 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: West Valley Highway Improvements(15th Street NW to W Main Street) TIP# 49 ProjectNo: asbdl3 ProjectType: Capacity Rroject Manager. TBD LOS Co rridor ID#35 Description: This project scope includes pavement rehabilitation arid re-channelization, roadway widenirig,bicycie lanes,pedestrian facilities,roadway lightiing,required stortn system improvemeMs, and IrrtelligentT2nspoRation 3ystem trnprovements. Progress Summary: Survey,base mapping arxl pre-design are planned to be completed in 2015;o complete preliminary plans and refine project cost�sti mate. Future Impacton Operating Budget: This project wi II Fiave no i mpact on the opereting budget for street mairrtenance. Activity: zo�a ve 2015 Yea�Entl Funtlin0 Sourees: Prlor to 2014 EsMmate 2015 Budget 2018 Budget ProJed Total Unrestncted Straet Revenue Giants-Unsecured(FeC,Stafe,LocalJ - TraH7c Impact Fees 700,000 100,000 Total Funding Sourees: 100,000 700,000 CaPltal ExpentliWrex Design - 100,OW 10U,000 Rlght ol WaY - - - - COIISrNC1I0li - Tofal ExpendiWres: - - 100,000 - �100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tmai Zon zo�a zo�s zozo 2o�s2ozo Funtling Sources Unres6icted Stre�Rewnue - - - Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,locaq 480.000 2,400,000 - - 2,880,000 T21/IclmpactFees 120,000 600,000 - 820,000 Total Funding Sourcea 600,000 3,OOD,OOD - - 5,700,000 Capifal ExpendiWrex Des)gn 60D,000 - - 700,000 Right o/ Way - - Construction 3,000,000 3,000,000 Tofal Ex�penElSures: 600,000 3,000,000 3,700.000 GraMs/Othar Sources: $� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year CapiWl Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion TIP # 51 Project No: cpxx�oc Project Type: Capacity Project Manager• TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Descriptlon: The project funds ttie design, coordination, permitdng, and construction of new ffS inhastructure along Lake Tapps Parkway from Lakeland Hilis Way to East Valley Highway, and along East Valley Highway to Lakeland Hills Way. The proposed fTS iMrastructure includes conduit, fiber, VMS signage, cameras, network communication upgrades, and weather shations along the route. Progress Summary: Federal Grant application was submitted to PSRC in May 2014. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual mairRenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Activity• 2074 YE 2075 Year Entl Funtlin9 Sources: Prfor to 2014 FsYimate 2015 Budget 2016 BuAget Project Total Unrestncfed Sfreet Revenue _ G2nts- Unsecured Federal 82,950 711,000 793,950 REET T2ffic Impact Fees 22,050 789,000 211,050 Other Tofal Funding Sources 105,000 90U,000 - 7,005,000 Capiml F�cpenditures Design 705,000 105,000 Right of Way Construction 900,000 900,000 Total Expenditures: 105,000 900,000 1,005,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tota I 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: Unrestnctetl Shaef Revenue _ Granls- UnsecuredFederal 711,000 REET Treflic Impact Fees �gg,ppp Otirer Total FunGing Sources: 900,000 CapHal Expenditures: Design _ Poght ol Way Constn�cfion gpp ppp Total F�cpendiWres: 900,000 Grants /Othar Sources: 51 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) caPira� Fac+iKies Pia� S& Year Capital Facilitles Plan, 20752020 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South and 12th Street SE IMersection Improvements TIP # 53 Project No: cp1114 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3 Description: The project will design and construct multi-modal irr[ersection improvemeMs at the AWS/12th SVeet SE intersection.The improvemerrts will include pedesVian access, bicycle lanes, signal phasing ard timing, and fTS upgrades. Progress Summary� Design is scheduled to be completed in 2015. FuWre Impact on Opereting Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget tor street maintenance. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources Prfor in 20Y4 Eatimate 2014 Budget 2078 Budget Prqect Tofal UnmsMctetl Street Revenue Ci2nfs- Unsecured Federal 250,000 I7EET2 - TraNic Impacf Fees 50,000 100,000 50,000 Othe� Totel Funding Sources: 50,000 350,000 50,000 CapNal F�cpenditures: Deslgn 50,000 50,000 Rlght o/ Wey - ConsWction 350,000 Toial Expenditures: 50,000 350,D00 50,000 Forecastetl ProJect Cost: � Total 2017 2018 2018 2020 201b2020 Funtling Sources: Unrestncted Sheet Revenue Grants- UnsecuredFedera/ 250,000 REET2 Tralirc Impact Fees 150,000 Other Tofal Funding Sources: - - - 400,000 Capital ExpendiNres: Design 50,000 ftight o/ Way - ConSINCNon 350,000 ToUI Expendltures: 400.000 Grarrts /Othet Sources: 52 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Kersey Way SE Corridor Study TIP # 54 Project No: asbdll Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description: This project will study improvemerrts to tlie Kersey Way SE corridorfrom the Wtnte River Bridge to the southem city limits. The study will develop the scope and costs for horimrrtal Nertical geometric roadway improvemerrts, provide roadside hazard mitigation,street IigMing and norrmotorized trail construction.The project length is approbmatelytwo miles. Progress Summary: Design will begin in 2015 following the completion of the update to the Comprehensive Plan. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maiMenance. Acti4ity. 2014 YE 2075 Year End Funding Sources Ptlor fo 2016 Estimate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget Prqect_Total Unrestncted Street Revenua - Gialrts- Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) - REET Tral/ic lvStigation Fees 50,000 50,000 Other Total Funding Sources 50,000 50,000 Capilal Fxpenditures: Design 50,000 50,000 Right o/ Way Constructlon Total Ezpenditures: 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: � - Total 2077 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Sfreef Revenue Grants- Secured(Fed,State,Loca/) TraNic fv5tigation Fees 50,000 Othaz (Developer)' 7otal Funtling Sources: 50,000 Capital 6cpenditures Design 50,000 Right o/ Way ConstrucLon Toql F�cpenditures: 5p,ppp GraMs /Other Sowces' 53 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capi[al Facilities Plan Six Year Capital FacilRies PWn,2015-2020 Spe¢ial Revenue Fund P'roject Title: W Main Street Multimodal Corridor and RS Improvements T1P # 55 Project No: Gp1414 ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager• Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 11 Description: This project will repurpose the ebstlng W Main St corridorwithin AWum s designated Regional Growtl�Cerrter and will coru4uct tritelligerrt Traruportation System(fT5)improvemerrts senring local and regiorial transpbrlatioh rietworks and a majorcommercial retail ceMer Impro�emeMs include corrverting the ezsting fourvlane roadwaysectionto a three-lane section including cerrter two-way left hm lane with new bike lanes,new sidewalks,new LED street lighting,and streetscape impro�.emeMs tietween West Valley HigFnvay and the trrterurban Trail. RS hnpro�.emer�ts include iMercormecting�and coordinating traific signals From C St NW along W Main St to W Valley Highway soutli to 151h St SW including two interchanges with SR-'IS arid orie with SR-167 Progress Summary• Federal graM was secured in 2014.Arterial Preservadon Furid 105 is participatirig in the pavement rehabilitation portion of tlrs project . .. Futu�e Impaet on OPerating Budget: Tlds projectwill havero impacton ihe operating budgetfor streetmaintenarice. Activity. 2014 VE 2075 Vear End Funding Sources: Prlor to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget _ 2016 Butlget ProJect Total Unrestncted Street Revenue -'' '" - " - - -" --' -- -- ' Orants-SecmetlFedera/ 804,�00 2,970,240 804,100 REET - Traf/ic Impact Fees 56,490 209,650 56,490 Ottier(Aitenal Preservation Fund f05) 85,410 314,510 85 470 Total Funtling Sourcei: 946,000 3,494,400 416,000 Capftal Expenditures: Design 946,000 966,000 Right o/ Way ConstNct/on 3,494,400 Total ErzpendiWros 946,000 3,494;400 -946,000 Forecasted Projeot Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2078 2020 20152020 Funding Sources Unrestncted Streef Rewnue Grents-Secured Federel 3,774,340 REET Traffic Impact Fees 266,740 Ofher(Artenal Preservation Fund f05) 399,920 Tobl Funtling Sources 4,M0,400 Capibl Erzpentliwres: Design 948,000 Righf ol Way Constmction 3,494,400 TotalF�Pentlilures: - - - -- - ----- -4.440.400 Granls/Other Sources� 54 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital FacilRies PWn Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund ProjectTitle: Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements TIP # 58 Project No: cpXXXX STIP#AUB-39 ProjectType: Capacity, Non-Nbtorized Projebt Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Desoription: The project will widen S 3161h Street from 51 st A�enue S to the west of the E�rgreen Elemer�tary School froniage,and S6th A�,enue S belween S 316th Street antl 5 318th Street The proposed widening will allow the addition of bike lanes and sidewalks on both sides of the street to match Ihe ebstlng rdadway cross-section to ihe east of the school.A roundabou[ will be coretructed at the S 3'161h StreeU56th Averwe S irrtersection replacing the ebsting all-way stopcorrtrol and the school drivewaywill be relocated to the west to align Knih tlie roundabouL The recoretruction of S 3161h Street inGudes the vartical aligrvnerrt of the ezsting roadway along the school fror�fage which creates sfgM-distance problems associated with the school driveways,and at the irrtersection with 56th Avenue S. Other project elemerhs include �mdergrowding of aerial utilities,street lighting,and upgrades to tlie stortn water system. Progress Summary• Design phase Grarrt tunding application was submitted in May 2014. Future Irrmpact on Operating Budget: This projeotwill ha"eno impac[on the operatingbudgetfor streetmairrtenance. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Vear End FunAing Sources Prlor fa 20�4 6tlmate 2015 Budgat 2018 BUAgst Projeet Total UrmesMcteo'StreetRevenue ��8,500 84,500 178,500 Grants-Unsecureo'Federal 877,500 478,500 671,500 RaNic Impacf Fees REET2 _ Other Total Funding Sources 790,000 563,000 780,000 Gpibl Ecpenditures Design 790,000 790,000 Poght a/ WaY 563.000 COAS1NCf%On Tdal6cpentlitures 790.000 583,000 79U,OD0 Forecasted Project Cost: 7om1 2017 2078 2079 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources Unrestncted Sbeet Revenue 693,000 ggg,ppp Grants-UrrsecuiatlFetleia/ 3,927,OD0 5,077,OW TrdKic Impact Fees REET2 _ anor rorai Funa�n9 so�rce: a,sso,000 s,s�s,000 Capital FspenAitures Des�gn �gp ppp Right d Way 563,000 ConSINCfIon 4,620,000 4,620,000 Total EzpenCftures d.620.000 5,973,000 Grants/Other Sources' 55 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilltles Pian Six Year CapitaJ Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way S Corridor Improvements(Fir St SE to Hemlock St SE) TIP # 58 Project No: cp1119 STIP# AUB-38 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 4 Description: This project will widen Aubum Way$outh behveen Fir St SE and Hemlock St SE to five lanes with curb, gutter, sidewalks, illumination and storin impro�emer�s. A new traffic signal will be corisVucted at Hembck Street SE arid cornect to Aubum's IrrteJligerrt Transportafion System. Pr'ogress Sumrima 'ry� Washington State Transportation Impro�ment Board (T18) awarded the City grant funds in the amount of$2,426,400 on Nooember 19, 2010. The MucklesFaot Indian Tribe is a project partner and is cor�6ibufirg ROW dedications and project funding in the amount$836,601 Future Impact on Opereting Budget: This annual mairdenance cost for this project is estimated to be$9,300. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Pdor to 2014 Estlmate 2075 Budget 2076 Budget Pr ec[Total Unrest/icted Street Revanue 150 - - - 150 Grarrts-Sec�red State 364,449 2,061,951 - 2,426,40U T2//ic Impact Fees 200,000 200,000 OflrerSouiCes(Muckleshoot) 91,112 745489 838,601 Total Funding Sourees: 455,711 2,807,440 200,000 - " 3;463,151 Capifal ExpendiWres Design 425,088 90,OD0 - 515,068 Right o/ Way 30,643 406,000 - 438,643 Consfruction 2,311,440 200,000 2,511,440 Tofal ExpendiWres 455,771 2,807,440 20D,000 - 3,453,151 forecasted Projed Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources Unrestrictetl Street Revenue - - - Grants-Secured State - - - - T2Krc Impacf Fees - - - - 200,000 Ofher Sources(Muckleshoot) Total Funding Sources - - - - 200,000 Capital EipenCihires Oesign ' - Right o/ Way ConStNCfion 200,000 Total FxpendiWres - - • 200,000 Gran[s I Other Sources: 56 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capifal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20�5-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Ave NE & 3rd St NE Pedestrian & Access Improvements TIP # 59 Project No: cp1023 Project Type: Capacky Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Description: This project will improve access,safety and operations for pedesVian, bicyclists and motorized vehicles at the iMersections of 3rd St NE/Aubum Ave, 4th St NE/Aubum Ave, ard 4th St NE/Aubum Way North. Improvemerrts include a new traffic signal at 3rd St NE to add a missing pedestrian crossing and accommodate the northbound left-tum mbvemerrt;improving pedesVian facilities to meet ADA requiremeMs, restricfing uncoMrolled accesses near the irrtersection,and modiTying the traffc sigrial at Aubum Way North and 4th St NE to eliminate the easUwest split phase operation. Progress Summary: Survey and pre-design were started in 2010-2011 Pre-design will be completed in 2015, with construction scheduled for 2017 pending grarrt funding. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This projec[ will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Activity: 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources: Prior fn 2074 Es[Imate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget ProjeQ Total Unmstncted Street Revenue 8,778 8,77g G2nfs- Unsecured(Fed,State,Loca/) _ TraHlc Impact Fees 50,000 50,000 REET2 Other Total Funding Sources: 8,T78 50,000 58,778 Capital Fxpenditures Design 8,778 50,000 58,778 Riqht of Way _ Construction Total 6cpendiwres: 8,n8 50,000 58,778 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: � - -� Unrestncted Stieet Revenue Grants- Unsecured(Fed,Stete,Local) 250,000 250,000 TrdNic Impact Fees 50,000 100,000 REET2 Other Total Funding Sources: 300,000 350,000 Capitel Expenditures: Design 50.000 R�ght of Way _ Construction 300,000 300,000 Total F�cpenditures: 300,000 350,000 Grants 1 Other Sources: 57 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STI2EET FUND (102) CapiWl Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Ttle: M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to AWS) TIP # 60 Project No: cp�oaoc Project Type: Capacky Pruject Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 6 Desc�iption: Widen M SVeet.SE irdo a mulfi-lane arterial beriveen 81h St SE and AWS. This projeat will improve mobility and is tied to cortidor devebpmerrt. fl is consisteM with the Gomprehensive Plan and corrtributes to the completion of a norttJsouth arterial corridor. Progress Summary• Future Impad on Operating Budget: This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $8,000. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources: Prior to 2014 Eatlmate 2015 Budget 1016 Budget Project Totel Uniestrlcted StrecM Revenue - Grants- Unsecured(Fed,Stafe,Local) haHic Impact Fees REET2 Other(Development) Total Funding Sources �--� _ - - - --- � - - - Capital Expenditures Des�gn - Right of Way QOIIS�NCNOII _ _- ____ Tofal ErzpenCiNres: Forecasted Project Cost: roml 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funiling Sources: Unrestncted Shset Revenue - - Grants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675,000 T215c Impact Fees 725,000 750,000 1,475,000 REET2 - Other(Deve/opmenf) 250,000 250,000 500,000 Total Funding Sources: 7,900,000 4,750,000 6,650,000 Capital ExpendiWres: Design 650,000 650,000 Right ol Way 1.250,000 1,250,000 Constniction 4,750,000 4,750,000 Total ExpendiWres: 1,900,000 4,750,000 6,650,000 Grarns /Other Souices: 58 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capitai Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Specia,l Revenue Fund Project TiBe: Auburn Way South Bypass- Riverwalk Dr to SR-78 at R St SE TIP # 61 Project No: cp�omc Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Description: This project will consVucta rew roadwaycortidorM bypass Aubun Way South. The new roadwaywill e#end from Rivervvalk Drive to R SVeet SE to the rorth of SR-18. A r�ew connection to a new irrterchange with SR-18. Progress Summary: FuWre Impact on Opereting BudgM: This armual maiMenarice cost for this project is estimated to be $25,000. Activily. 2074 YE 2015 Year EnE Funding Sourcex Prior W 2014 Esfimate 2015 BuOpet 2016 Budget Pro eet Tofal Umesficted Stieet Revenue - _ - � - _ G2nts- Unsecured(Fetl,Stffie,LocalJ _ REET _ TraNic lmpact Fees Other (Developmenf) Tofal Funtling Sour�es - . Capiql F�cpentlitures: Design Righf of Way Construction Toql ErzpendiWres: - . Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2078 2020 2015-2020 Funtling Sources UnresMcted Sheef Revenue - G2nfs- Unsecured(Fed,Stafe,Local) 4,800,000 4,800,000 REET Tra/lic Impact Fees _ Other (De�lopment) 1,200.000 1.200,000 Tofal Funding Sources: 6,000,000 6,000,000 Capital Erzpenditures: Des79� 6,000,000 6,000,000 Rlght ol Way _ Construction Topl F�cpentllWres: 6,000,000 6,00O,OOD G2nts I Oiher Sources: 59 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capifal Facilkies Plan Six Year Capifal Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Special Reve�ue Fund Project TiUe: 29th St SEIR St SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 63 Project No: cpinooc Project Type: Capacky Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 18, 27 Descriptfon: This project funds the design, rigMof-way acquisition and consVuction of intersection capacity and safery improvemerrts at the 29th St SEIR St SE irrtersection.Tivs project will include creating eastbowdN✓estbound dual left-tum laries, a�ndlia_ry signal heads and pedestrian safety enhancemerrts. Progress Summary: Future Impaot on Operating Budget: This project will have ro impact on the opereting budget for street mairRenance. Activity. (Predous Vrs) 2074 YE 2015 Vear End FunOing Sourcea Ptlor to 2014 EsYlmate 2015 Budgat 2016 Budgat Projact Total Unrestricted Sheet Reoenue - Grants- Unsecurad(Fed,State,Local) T�c Impacf Fees - REET - ONrer Total Funtling Sourcax - Capital 6cpendlWres: Deslgn - RigM o/ Wey Construction Toal Espendltures: - - • - - Forecasted Prcject Cost: rotal 2017 2018 Z019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources Unrastncted Sheet Revenue - - Grants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 1,300,000 7,300,000 Tra�c Impact Fees 500,000 500�000 REET Other Total Funding Sources - 1.800,000 1.800,000 CepNal EzpentliWres: Design 350,000 350,000 Rlgbt W Wey 450,000 450,000 Constructlon 1,000,000 1,00O,OOU Total Expenditures: 7,800,000 � � - 1.800,000 GraMs I Other Swrces: 60 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAI STREET FUND (102) CapiTal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project TUe: Lea Hill Rd SegmeM 1 (R St NE ta 105th PI SE) TIP # 64 Project No: cpxu�ac Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Desc�iption: Widen the ebs6ng roadway to provide a fourvlane cross section pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The project includes widenirg the Green River Bridge. Progress Summary: Two parcels along the future roadway alignmeM were prdcured in 2014. Corridor pre-design eHort is plahned to begin in mid 2015 foliowing adoption of the ComprehensivE Transportation Plan major update. Future Impact on Opereting Budget: This annual maintenance cbst for this project is estimated to be$18,300 Attivity: (PreHous Yrs) 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2014 Estimate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget Project Total Unrestncted Street Revenue Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Locap Treff�c Impact Fees 600,000 150,000 750,000 OtFrer Total Funding Sources: 600,000 150,000 750,000 Capifal ExpendlWres: Design 150,000 150,000 Right o/ Way 600,000 600,000 Construchon Tofal Erzpenditures: 600,000 150,000 750,000 Forecasted Project Cost: rura� 2017 2018 2079 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Revenue Grants- Unsecurad(Fed,State,Local) 1,950,000 8,000,000 9,950,000 Traffic Impact Fees 500,000 2,000,000 2,650,000 Other Tofal Funding Sources: 2,450,000 10,000,000 12,600,000 Capltal 6cpendiWres: Design 1,950,000 2,100,000 Poght of Way 500.000 500.000 Construction 10,000,000 10,000,000 Total Expenditures: 2,450,000 10,000,000 12,600,000 GrdMs /Othef SoufGes: 61 City ofAubuYn Draft Capital Facilities Plan - - - - - - - - — -- ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Rd SegmeM 2 (105th PI SE to 772th Ave SE) TIP # 65 Project No: cp�oocx Project Type: Capacity Pmject Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description: Project includes widenirg the e�sting roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Progress Summary� Future Impact on Operating Budget: This anrival mairitenance costforthis project is esdmated to be $24,100. Activity - 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Pdor to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget_ Project Total Unrestncted Street Revanue - Grarrts-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) Traffic Irrmpact Fees - Other Tofal FunAing Sources - Capifal F�cpendiWres: Design - RigM o7 Way - - Construction - Total ExpendiWres: - - - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 20TA 20152020 Funding Sources Unrestricted Street Revanue - - G2nts-Unseqmed(Fed,State,Local) 2,900,000 7 700,000 10,000,000 T2ffic/mpact Fees 800,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 Other Total Funding Sources: - 3,500,000 5,500,000 72,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,000,000 2,000,000 Right of Way 1,W0,000 - 1,500,000 Construction 8,500000 8,500,000 Total-Eipendihires 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,00O,OOr G2nts/Other Sources: 62 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) capiral Paci�ities P�an Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Pmject Titie: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3(112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) TIP # 66 Projact No: cpiaxx Project Type: Capacky Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Description: Project includes widening fhe epsting roadway to provide a four-lane crosssection includirg pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This annual mairRenance cost for this projed is estimated to be$20,300. Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Year End FunAing Sources: Prlor to 2014 Esdmate 2075 Budget 2018 Budget ProJeet 7otal UnrasMcted Street Revanue - Giants-Unsecmed(Fed,State.Lxan - Traffic Impect Fees - Other Totai Funding Sourcex - - - - Capifal ExpentliWres Design - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction Total ExpenCitures: - - - • - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018_ 2019 2020 20752020 FunNng Sourees: - UnresMcted Street Revenue Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 3,000,000 3,000,000 TreKc Impact Fees - 1,000.000 1,000.000 Other Total Funding Sources: 1,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 Capital F�cpentliWrex Design 500,000 500,000 Right o( Way 500,000 500,000 Constiucfian 3,000,000 3,000.000 Total ExpendlWres: - 1,000,000 3,000,000 - 4,000,000 G2Ms/Other Sources: 63 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facfli8es Plan, 2015-2020 _ Special Re"venue Fund Project Title: I Street NE and 22nd Street NE Roundabout Safety Improvement TIP # 69 Project No: cpxXX Pmject Type: Capacky (Safety) Project Manager TBD LOS .orridor ID# 21 Description: TFus project inciudes ihe design and construction of a roundabout at the 22nd Street NE irRersection with I Street NE. This is currently a 4-way stop controlled iMersection. Progress Summary• - Mul6ple grant applications vYere submitted in May/Juy 2014. Future Impad on Operetlng Budget: TheYe is rm impact to the street maiMenance budget Activity (PreHous Yrs) 2014 YE 20'IS Yea�Entl Funding Sources: PAor to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget Projee!Total_. Unrestricted Street Revenue _ _ _ Grmrts-Unsecured Federal - - 160,000 940,000 160,000 Traffic Impact Fees - qp,ppp p�,ppp pp,ppp REET2 Other Total Funding Soureex - 200,000 1,175,000 Z00,000 Capital Ezpenaiwres: Design 400.000 - 200.000 RigM of Way - - - ConstruCtion 1,175,000 Totel Expendifures - 2Q0,000 1,175,000 200,000 Forecasted Project Cost: rota� 2077 2018 2019 20211 2U'IS2020 Funding Sources: Unrestiicted Street Re�nrre _ _ _ Grants-Unsecured Federal - - 1,100,000 T�c Impact Fees - - 275,000 REET2 _ _ _ Other Totel Funding Sourcex - - - 1,375,000 Capftal Expendilurex Desi9� - ' 200,000 Right o/ Way - - Conshuction - 1,175,000 Toql Expendiwres • - - 7,375,OM Grants/Other Sources: - - 64 I City of Aubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capltal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: West Valley Highway Irtiprovements (SR-18 to 15th Street SW) TIP � 72 Project No: cp�000c Project Type: Capacky Project Manager TeD LOS Corridor ID# 35 Description: This project scope includes pavemerrt rehabilitation and re-channelization, pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, improved roadway ligh6rg, required stortn system improvemerRs, irrtersection signal replacemerrt at 15ih St SW, and trdelligerrt Transportation System trnprovemeMs. Progress Summary: Survey, base mappirg and pre-design are plarmed to be completed in 2015 to complete preliminary plans and refine project cost-esNmate. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maiMenance budget. Activity. (PreNous Yrs) 2014 YE 2075 Year End Funding Sources: PMor to 2014 Estimate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget ProjeU Tofal Unrestricted Street Revenue - - Grants-Urtsecured(Fed,Stafe,Lxal) - T2//ic Impact Fees - 100,000 100,000 REET2 Ofher Total Funding Sources: - 100,000 700,000 Capifal Expendi4ues: Des�9^ 100.000 100�000 Right o/ Way ' Construction - Total Ezpenditures: 100,000 100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: TOTaI 2017 2018 2019 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources: Unresfnctetl§treef Revenue _ , Grants-Unsecured(Ferl,State,Lxal) 400,000 2,000,000 - 2,400,000 TraKc Impact Fees 100,000 500,000 700,000 REET2 Other Tofel Punding Sources: 500,000 2,500,000 - 3,100,000 Capital ExpendlWres: Design 500.000 - 6pp.ppp R�ght of Way Conshuchon - 2.500,000 2.500.000 Tofal Expendituras: 500,000 2,500,000 - 3,700,000 Grants/Other Soumes: 65 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project THe: Auburn Way Corridor(4th St NE to 4th St SE) TiP �F 3 Project No: c409a0, cpiooa ProjectType: Non-Capacky Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2, 3 Description: Tvs project is based on a pre-design study to improve pedestrian accessibility, appearance, and link tlie downtown area abrg Aubian Way SouN between4th Street NE and 4th Street SE. The project may include some pavementrepairs. However an oveday was compieted as part of the Citys ARerial Pavemerrt Preservation Program in 20W AtThough this was considered a temporaryfix the scope has been modified to accoim[for the pavemertwork. The project is appropmately0.5 miles lorig. _ _ _ Prdgres's Summary• - The pavemeM portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial Pavement Preservation Prog2m. Futtire Impact ori Operating Budget: This project will have rio impact on the operatirg budget for street maiMenance. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources: Prlor ro 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget Y018 Budget Project Total Unrestncted Sheet Revenue 78.251 78,251 Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,State,LocaQ REET - T�t Impact Fees Other Sources Total Funtling Sources: 78,251 - - • - 78.251 Capltal bcpendlturas: Desfgn 78.251 78.251 RigM o( Wey Constructlon Total F�cpendih�res: 78,251 - 78,251 Forewsted Project Cost: Totel 2017 2018 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funtling Sources: UnrestActed Street Revenue 71�,000 600,000 710,000 C,rants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 708,700 2,400,000 3,108,700 REET TraHic Impect Fees OBrer Somces Total Funding Sources 878,700 3,000,000 3,818,�00 CaPltal Fxpenditures Deslgn 618.700 618.700 Right o/ Wey 200.000 200,000 Construct/on 3,000,000 3,U00,000 Tofal Expendiwres: 818,700 8,000,000" - 3,818,70� Grarrts /Olher Sources: 66 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way Northllst Street NE Signal Impravements TIP # 19 Project No: asbd05 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Description: This project will construct a new traf�c signal with corriroller cabine[and battery backup along with necessary intersection improvemeMs. Progress Summary� Design will be completed in 2015. Construction will be completed when funding is secured. Future Impact on Operatlng Budget: This project will ha�e ra impact on the operating budget for street mairrtenance. Activity. 2014 YE 2p15 Year End Funding Sources: Prlor M 2076 Esdmate 2075 Budget ?A18 Budget ProJeet Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 - 50,000 Grants-Unsecmed(Fed,State,Loca!) _ _ T2ff�c Impact Fees _ _ Other Total Funding Sources: - 50,000 50,000 Capital ExpendiWres Des�gn - 50,000 50,Opp Right o/ Way - _ COIISINCIIOII Toial F�cpentli4ires: - 50,000 - 50,000 Forebasted Project Cost: Toql 2017 ZO18 2019 20Z0 201&2020 Funding Sourees Unmstricted Street Re�nue 125,000 �75,ppp Grants-Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 425,000 - 425,000 T�c Impacl Fees _ _ Ot/rer Tofal Funding Sourcex 550,000 600,000 Capital EzpendiWres: Design - - 50,ppp RigM o/ Way 100,000 - 100,000 Construction 450,000 - q5p.ppp Tofal ExpendiWrex 550,000 - - 600,000 Grarrts/Other Souices: G2nt(unds a�e unsecure 67 City ofAuburn Draf't Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilitles Plan Six YeaY Capital, Fa¢ilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Main Street Signal Upgrades TIP # 21 Project No: cp140.6 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor m# 11 Description: Reconstruct the ebsting traFic signals at C St NW and W Main St and at E Main St and Auburn AvelA St SE. The new C S NW signal vYould provide protected left-tum phasing for C St, and wo�9d provide additional safely related to the reilroroad pre- emption.The Aubum Ave/A St signal would replace one of the Citys oldest sigrols which has exceeded its design life. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating B'udget: This project will have ro impact on Uie operating budget for street mairrtenance. Activky. 2074 YE 2014 Year End Funding Sotirces Prlor b 2014 Estlmata 2015 Bud et 2018 Budgal ProJeG Totel Umestncted Sheet Reoenue 315,000 5,000 320,000 GrarRs- Unsecurad(Fed,State,Lncaq - REET - Tra/fic Mitigation Fees 150.000 t50,000 ane. Total Funtling Sources 465,000 S,ODO 470.000 Cnpipl �pendi[urea Design 50.000 50,000 Righf d Way - Consfrucfion 475,000 5.000 420,000 Tofal Expe_ndiWres: 465,000 S.OUO - 470,000 Forecasted Project Cost: rom� 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources Un25Mcted Street Re�nue 5,000 Grants- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) - REET - - TraNic Mt�gatron Fees Ofher Total Funding Sourcex - 5•�� Capital ExpendiWrex Design - - RigM o/ Way - - Construction 5•� rorai �Pana�mres: - s.oa Grarris /Other Sources: 68 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapiWl Facilitles Plan Six Year Capital Facilifles Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street SE Safety Improvements Study TIP # 27 Project No: cp1110 Project Type: Safety (Non-Capacity) Project Manager. James Webb LOS Corridor ID# 10,33 Description: Shrdy the A Street SE corridor between 6th SVeet SE and Lakeland Hills Way SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study will review the safety and access needs ofUie Vavelirg public and the adjacent properties. Progress Summary• hrFwuse pre-design will be dor�to 2fine project scope, alignment, and cost will be complete in 2013. 2014 design will complete deTailed corridor plan for�uture improvemerrts. Future Impad on Operating Budget: This study will ha�,e rro impact on the opera6rg budget for street maiMenance. Activity: 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prlor l0 2014 ESimate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget ProJect Total_ Unrastdcted Sfieet Revenue 1,230 45,000 5.000 51,230 Grants- Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) REET T2ffic A�Stigatian Fees _ Other Total Funding Sources 1,230 45,000 5,000 51,230 Capital F�cpentlitures Des/gn 1,230 45,000 5,000 51,230 Righf ol WaY _ Construcnw Toql F�pendleures: 1,230 dS,000 S,OUO "51,230- Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources Unrestncfed Street Revenue 5,000 Granfs- Securad(Fed,State,Local) REET _ Tra((ic Impact Fees _ Other Toql Funding Sources: 5,000 Capital EzpenEitures Dasign 5,000 Righf ol Way CAOSWC�IO/I Total Expenditures: 5,000 Grarrcs /Other Sources: 69 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faeilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fu�d ?roject TiUe: S 277th Street -Wetland Mitigation TIP # 29 Project No: c410a0 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager. Nlatt Larson LOS Corridor ID# N!A Desoription: Wetland mitigation for ihe S 277th St grade separation project. Progress Summary• This is a 10-year obligation, which began in 2004. Puture Impaet on Operating Budget This pmject will ha� ra impact on ihe operatirg budget for street maiMernance. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year Entl FunAing Sources: PAor ro Y014 Fstimate 2015 Budget 2076 BudBet Pro�ect Total Unrestncfed Streef Revenue 264,084 55,000 25.000 344,084 Gianfs- Secwed(Fed,Stffie,Loca/) - - REET - - TraKx Impect Fees Other Total Funding Sourees 264,0&1 55,000 25,000 - 366,084 Capltal ExpentliWre9: Design 730,997 10.000 70,000 iW,997 RIgM ol Way - Construcfion 733,087 95.000 15.000 193.087 Total �penAiluros: 264,084 55,000 25,000 - 344,084 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Tota I 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funtling Sourcex UnresMcted Sheet Re�enua 25,000 Grents- Secured(Fed,Sfate,Lxal) - REET - - Traffic Impact Fees Other Total Fundin9 Sources: - 25,000 Capital Expenditures Design 10,000 RigM o1 Wey - Construct/on 75,000 Toal ExpendlWres: • - 25,000 Grarrts/Other Sources� �� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capitai Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital FacilRies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Ttle: Citywide Pedestrlan Accessibility and Safety Program TIP # 30 Project No: asbd08 Project Type: Non-Capacity(Mnual) Project Manager Pabio Para LOS Corridor ID# N/A Descrlption: This is an annual program to fund pedesVian access and safety improvemerrt projects at locations Woughout the City. Projects are prioritized annualy based on pedesUian demands,epsting deficiencies, and citiaen requests. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Opereting Budget: � This project will have ra impact on the operating budget for street maiMenance. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prfor to 2014 Eslfmate 2015 Bud9et 2016 Budget Project Total Unresfncted Sfinet Rerenue 100,000 1�0,000 100,000 Grenfs- Secmad(Fetl,Stafe,Locaq REEr _ T2�c Impacf Fees _ Otbei 7otel Funding Sourcex 700,000 100,000 100,000 CaPital EzpenAiWres Deslgn 15,000 15,000 30,000 Poghf of Way _ COnSfNCf%On $$,000 85,000 &5,000 Total Ficpanditures: - 100.OW 700,000 115.000 Forecasted Project Cost: Toml 2077 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: UnrestnctedStreet Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grents- Secured(Fed,State,Lxal) REET T2f/ic Impacf Fees Other Total Funding Sources 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capiql Ezpenditures Design 15,000 15.000 15,000 15,000 90.000 Right ol Way ' ConSWCllon 85.000 85.000 85.000 85.000 S1O.000 Total Fi�pendiWrea: 100,000 100,000 100,000 700,000 600.000 GraMs !Other Sources: I 71 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkles Plan Six Year Capihal Faciltties Plan, 2G15-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Ckywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements T1P # 37 Project No: astid07 Project Type: Non-Capacky(Safety) ProJect Manager Various LOS Corridor ID# N/A Description: This is a bi-annual program to fuM bicycle and safety improvemerds on classified roadways. Projects are prioritized annualy based upon field studies.Project was previousry called "Citywide Roadway Safety trfiastruchae ImprovemeMs" Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budge;: This project will have ro impact on the operatirg budget for street maintenance. ActWiry. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sourcea Pdor tu 2074 EStlmate 2015 Butlpet_ __�18.Budgat __ _ P.roJact Toial UnresMcted Street Rerenue - 100,000 Grents- Secured(Fed,State,lxal) - REET - TlaNic Impecf Fees - Other Tofal Funtling Sources: - 70Q000 - cawm� �aa�mmrea Deslgn 70.000 - RigM o1 Way COnS(NCfiOn 90,000 Total F�cpendilures: - 100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tmai 2017 4018 2079 2020 201&2020 Funtling Sources: UnrestnctedStreet Revenue 100,000 100,000 300,000 Grants- Securetl(Fed,Stata,Local) REET - Tra�c /mpacf Fees Ofhei Total Funding Sourtes 10U,000 � 700.000 300,000 Capifal ExpendiWrea Design 70.000 10.000 30.000 Righf o/ Way - - COl15�2C��0lI �.� �.�� 27�,�� Total EupandiWres: 100,000 �oo.000 aoo,00r GraMs /Other Sources: �2 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital FaciJities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapiWl Facilitles Plan Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan, 2015-2020 Speciat Revenue Fund Project TiUe: 37th St NW & B St NW Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements TIP # 38 Project No: cp1304 STIP# AUB-43 Pmjed Type: Intersection Safety (Non-Capacity) Project Manager. Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridw ID# N/A Description: This project will fund the design and consWction ofa pre-signal atthe 37th SVeet MNB Street NW imersection adjacent to the atyrade BNSF rail crossing, and to mitigate impacts from the proposed BNSF third rail project. The project will include communication improvements and advanced train detection for new wamirg times for advanced railroad preemption at the si nal. Progress Summary• Future Impad on OperaUng Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Activity: 2U14 YE 2075 Year End Funding Sources: PAw W 2014 Estimate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget _ProJect Total UnresMcted Straet Rewnue 12,310 64,590 5,000 - 81,900 G2nts-Secured(Fed,State,Locaq 7t,112 285,438 307,550 REET - Other Total Funding Sources: 34,4Y2 350,028 5,000 389,450 Capital Ezpendihires Design 34.422 50,000 84,422 Right o/ WaY ' ' Construchon 300,028 5,000 .305,028 Total Expenditures 34,422 350,028 5,000 389,450 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2077 20'IS 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources: Un2stncted Street Revenue - 5,000 Giants-Secured(Fed,State,local) REET - Other Total Funding Sources - - - 5,000 Capipl Expendttures Design - Rlght ol Way - - Construction 5,000 Total Expenditures - - - 5,000 Grants /Other Sources: 73 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Cap'Ral Facilities Phan Six Year Capital Faoilltles Ptan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NE Pedestrian Improvements TIP # 44 Pr�ject No: cp�000c Project Type: Sidewalk Improvements(Non-Capacity) Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID# N!A Descriptlon: This project completes a pedestrian connection between Dowrrtown Aubum and the 8th St NE business district. This project will improve a pedestrian crossing at 3rd St NE, and construct sidewalks/access 2mps along the A St NE cortidor Progre§s Summary• Future Impact on Operatlng Budget: The armuai maintenance cost forUtis project is es6mated to be $500. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Fundfng Sources Prlor b 2014 6Umate 2075 ButlAet 2076 Budget Pro)act Tofal Unrestncted St�aet Revenue - Grents- Unsecured(Fed,Sfate,Loca/) REET PWTFL Other Total Funding Sources - Gapital ExpenAiturcx Design RigM of Way COIIS�NC�IO/1 7ofal ExpentllL�res: - Forecasted ProJect Cost: Total TA17 2018 2079 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sources Un2sMcted Street Revenue Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,State,Local) 150,000 1d0,000 REET - PWTFI - Other Total FunCing Sourcez 150,000 - 150,000 CapNal ExpentliWres Deskjn 15,000 15,000 R/ght oi Way Constn�ction 135,000 135,000 Total Expenditures: 150,000 - - 150,000 Grants /Olher Souices: Grarn funds are unsecure. 74 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Faciii8es Plan Six Year Capital Faciiities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Pmject Title: IMerurban Trailhead Improvements TiP # 45 Project No: cp�000c Project Type: Class 1 Trail (Non-Capacky) Project Manager TBD LOS Cwridor ID# N/A Description: This projed pro�des enhancements to epsting Uailheads and consVuction of new trailheads. Improvements include bike racks, kiosks, parkirg and access. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Opereting Budget: This project will have rro impact on the operatirg budget for street mairrtenance. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior b 2014 Estlmate 1A15 Budget 2016 Budget ProJect Total UnrasMcted Street Revenue Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,State,Lxal) TraHic Mrtlgatlon Fees - PWTFL Other Total Funding Sources: - - Capfpl Expenditures: Deslgn - RipM a/ Wey Consfmction Total ExpenAituros: - - - - Forecasted Project Cost: roal 20t7 2076 2018 2020 20152020 Funding Sourwa: Unresfrlcted Sfreet Revenue - Granfs- Unsecured(Fed,State.Locaq 210,000 210,000 T�c MngaOon Fees - PWTFL - Other Total Funding Sources: 210,000 210,000 Capifal FxpendiNras: Deslgn 20,000 20,000 Right ol Way - Construclion 190.000 190.000 Toml ExpentliWres: 270,000 - 210,000 Grarrts /O[her Swrces: GraM funds a�e unsecu�e. 75 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (702) Capifal Facili[ies Plan Slx Year Capital. Facil@les Plan, 20152020 Speclal Revenue Fund Projact Title: 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study TIP # 46 Pmject No: cp1021 ProjectType: Noo-Capacity (Intersection Safety) Project Manager James 1Nebb LOS Corridor ID# 24 De.scriptbn: - - - This project fimds a pre�esign study to detertnine the rigM-of-way,ernironmental and construction requiremerrts for irrtersection safety improvemerds.The project is anticipated to inGude sigM-distance improvemerhs,constructing tum- lanes, charmelization,ernironmerdal mitigation,signage and clear mre improvemerNs. Progiess Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Tlvs project will have ro impact on the operaGrg budget for street maintenance. Aetivily: - -- zo�a re zo�s rea� eoa Funding Sources: PAor b 2014 ESUmafe 2015.Butlget_ _ 2016 Btitlget ProJact Total Umestdcted5treet Reoenue 3,228 5,000 - � "- --� 8,22g Grents- Secured(Fed,State,l.ocap REET PWTFL _ Other Total FunAing Sources 3,728 5,000 8,228 Cepital EicpendiWres Design 3,228 5,000 8,228 R/BM o! Way COIIS(NC�kVI Total EipandiWres: 3.278 5,000 " - - "8.228 Forecasted ProJebt Cost: Total 2017 2016 2019 2020 20152020 FunAing Sources: - UniasMcted Sfreet Revanue 5,000 cranrs- secureA(r-ed,srare,Local) _ _" REET PWTFL _ Other Total Funding Sourcex - " - - - - 5,000 Capltal ExpendlNrea: Des19� 5.000 RigM o/ Way CdIStNCt%011 rom� Expeocitures: s,w� Grarrts /Othar Sou�cas: 76 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) CapiYal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faciiities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A St SE 8 6th St SE Safety and Access Improvements TIP # 48 Project No: asbd09 Project Type: Non-Capacky Project Manager James Webb LOS Corridor ID# N/A De"scription: This project is a partnership between Aubum and Burlington Northem Santa Fe Railway to improve the irrtersection of A St SE and 6th St SE.The scope of the project includes addirg a phase to the traffic signal for traffic eMering and ebtirg tfie BNSF railyard. Progress Summary• Design and consVuc6on is planned to be completed in 2015 pending agreemerrt with BNSF Futuie Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funtlin9 Sources: Prlor to 2014 Esfimate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget ProJec[ Total Unrestncted Street Revenue - G2nfs- Secured(Fed,State,Local) TreNic Impact Fees PWTFL Other(BNSF) 50,000 50,000 Total Funding Sources 50,000 50,000 Capifal FJcpentlitures: �eslgn 70,000 10,000 RigM o/ Way ConStNCtiOn 40,000 40,000 Total Ezpentlitures: 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofa I 2077 2018 2079 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Street Revenue GraMs- Secured(Fed,Stafe,Local) TraRic Impact Fees PWTFL Other(BNSF) 50,000 Tofal Funding Sources: 50,000 Capitel Erzpenditures: Design 10,000 Right ol Way Construction 40,000 Tofal Expendltures: 50,000 Gran[s /O[her Saurces: - "�� 77 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capita� Facnn�es P�an Six Year Capifal F.acilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project TiUe: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP # 50 Project No: cp�000c Project Type: Non-.Capacity(ITS) Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Description: This project funds the design and construction of Dynamic Message Sigris at various looatioris throughout the City. Dynamic message sigrs are an importarrt fTS tool for providing infortnation to roadway users. Pnonty locations for sign placementare based on the Comprehensive Trarsportation Plars fTS map and include Aubum Way N, Aubum Way S, W �Ualley High✓uay,E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Rd. Progress Summary: " -- -- -- - ihe first phase of this project is scheduled to begin in 2016 or sooner if grarrt fimdirg becomes available. Futuje Im{iact on Op�ratirig Budget: lYie amual mairrtenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Activity 2074 VE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior fn 2014 Estlmate 2075 Budget 2016 Butlget ProJect Tofal UnresttictetlSfreet Revenue - " - -"- - - "- 15,000 - Grants- Unsecu2dFederal 85,000 85,000 REET PWTFL OtFrer Total Funtling Sources: 100,000 85,000 Captfel Eipendltures: Des/gn 10,000 70,000 Right oi Way Construcfion 90,000 90,000 Tofal ExpentliWres: 100,000 Forecasted Projed Cost: - --- - -�-- � — Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 201i2020 Funding Sourcex UnrestncfedStreet Revenue 30,000 30,000 75,000 Grants- UnsecuredFederel 170,000 170,000 425,000 REET - _ PWTFL _ Other Tofal Funding Sources: 200,000 200,000 500,000 Capital ExpendiNres: Design 20,000 20,000 50,000 Right of Way - - Construction 180,000 180,000 450,000 Total Ezpentlitures: T00,000 200,000 � -"� -- - - SOO,OOP Grarns /Othe� Souices: 78 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: AWS Streetseape Improvements (SR-78 to M St SE) TIP # 62 Project No: cpxxzx Project Type: Miscellaneous Projeot Manager TBD LOS Cwridor ID# 3 Desbriptfon: This project will revitalize and beautlfyAWS from the SR-18 irrtercharige to the intersection with M Street SE. Proposed improvemerAs inciude:enhancemerrt of crosswalks and pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sidewalks;ciub aM gutter pedestrian ramps; new landscaped medians;sVeet Vees; new lighfirg; pedesVian benches;trash receptacles; recycling containers arxl other appropriate amenities.A significarrt portion of project costs are associated with rigMof-way acquisition. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Opereting Budget: � TFus armual maiMenance cost for this project is estimated to be $10,000. Activity: 2074 YE 2015 Yeet End Funding Sources: Prior to 201d Estimate 2075 Budget 2U78 Budget Project Total UnresMcfed Street Revenue - -� Grents- Unsecured(Fed,State,Locel) Tra//ic Impact Fees REET2 _ ONrer Tofal Funtling Sources: : Capipl ExpandiWrex Design _ Right o/ Way _ Construct/on Tolal Fspendltures: - - Forecasted Project Cost: Toml 2017 2U18 2019 2020 20152020 FunAing Sources Unrestncted Sfreet Revenue 200,000 200,000 400,000 �2nts- Unsecurad(Fed,State,Local) 1,750,OD0 2,600,000 4,350,000 TrdNic Impacf Fees REET2 - Other Toinl Funding Sources: 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 Capiral Expendlturex Des/gn 500.000 500,000 Right W Way 1,450.000 1,450,000 ConStNCNon 2.800.000 2.800,000 7otal Expendiwras: - 7,950,000 2,800,000 4,750,000 Grarris /Olher Souaes: 79 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capifal Facilitles Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvements TIP# 67 Project No: cp1222 STIP# AUB-45 Projed Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# WA Description: - This project wiil improue traffic signal phasirg and timing, improoe visibility of 6affic signai heads, install couMdown pedestrian signai dispiays, and ADA pedestrian pushbuttons. Progress Summary: G2nt funding was awarded June 2012 with no bcai match requiremerrt. Projed will be designed and coretructed in 2013 and corutructed in 2014. Future Impad on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maiMenance budget. Activky 2014 YE 2075 Year End Funding Sourcea Prlor b.2014 EsUmate 2015 Budget 2018 Butlget Project Total Unrestricfed Street Reeenue 6,916 55.000 5.000 86,916 G2Ms- Secured Federal 31,626 368,376 400,000 TreNic Impact Fees REET2 4,316 20,684 25,000 Other Total Funding Sourcea: 42,85fi 444,060 5,000 - 491,916 Cepifal ExpendlWres: Deslpn 41,075 - 41.075 Rlght ol Way - Constmcflon 1,781 444,060 5,000 450,841 Total F�cpendiausc 42.856 44t.060 S,OOD - 497.9t6 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20752020 Funtling So6rces: --�- - - � - --� - � - . . UnresMcted Sfreet Revenue 5,000 GraMs- Secured Federel - Tralfic Impact Fees - REET2 Other Tofal Funding Sourcex 5,000 CaPital ExPendlWres: Design - R/ght o/ Way - - COlIStNG�1011 _ S,OOO_ Totel Expentlitures 5,00' Grants I Olher Soutces: g� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faci,lides PWn, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 37th St SE & A St SE Traffic Signal Safety Improvement TIP # 68 Project No: asbd02 Pmject Type: IMersection Improvement, Non-capacity Project Manager TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Description: This project consists of the design, rigM of way acquisidon and constructlon of a new traffic signal at 37th St SE &A St SE. Piogre'ss Summary• Grant application is being submitted in July 2014. Arterial Presenation Fimd 105 will participate in this projed to overtay portions of A St SE. Future Impack on Operating Budget: The annual mairrtenance cost for this project is es6mated to be$2,500. Adivity: 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2074 EstimaOe 2015 BUAget 2016 BUAget Pro ect Total Umestricfed Street Reeenue 55,000 � 45,000 55,000 G2rits-Unsecured Federel 121,400 440,000 121,400 T�a//ic/mpact Fees � Other(Artenal P�eserv. FurM 105) �52�5pp Tolal Funding Sources: 176,400 637,300 176,400 Capifal Ezpenditures: Design - - 110,000 N0,000 Right o/ Way - 68,400 66,400 Construction 637.500 Tofal F�cpendlWres: 176,400 637,500 776,400 Fore.casted Project Cost: - Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 201&2020 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Stree�Re�enue - 100,000 GraMs-Unsecurad Federal 587 qpp TraNic/mpact Fees _ O[her(Artenal Preserv FurM f05) 152,500 Tofal Funding Sourcex - - 873,900 Capital ExpendlWrex �s�9^ 170.000 Right o/ Way 66,400 ConStniChon 637.500 Total ExpendtLires - - - 813,900 �rants/Other Sources: O[her Funds are Fund 105 Arterial Presenatwn Funds gi City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-2A CAPITAL FACILITIES PL-AN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION — LOCAL STREET 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total CeDeeIN Pfdeefs: None Non�CaontiN Prolecls: 1 Local Street Improvemen!Progrem CapitalCosLs 2,600,000 1,600,000 1,BOO,ODO 1,600,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 70,600,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 2,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 7,600,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 10,6U0,000 Transferin(W/S/SWMUGIit» - - - - SalesTaxonConstructlon - - - - • Bond Proceeds - UtiliryMidgation - - - - - SUMMARY: CAPRALCOSTS CapacityProjecis - - Non-CapaGryProjec4s .2,600,000 1,600,000 1,800.000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,OD0 10,600,000 Total Cosfs 2,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 7,600,000 7,600,000 10,600,000 FUNDINGSOURCES: Funtl Balance 2,800,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 10,6D0,000 Trensferin(WlSSWMUUIiry) - - - - - SalesTaxonConsWction - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - UtlIiryPADgauon - - Total Funding 2,600,000 7,600,000 1,600,000 7,600,000 7,600,000 1,600,000 10,600,000 g2 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan LOCAL STREET FUND (103) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Special Revenue Fund Project TiUe: Local Street Improvement Program TIPq 37 Project No: Various Project Type: Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Descriptfon: The progrem preserves bcal (unclassified)streets. The work includes crack sealing,asphaR patching,pre-leveling,asphatt overlays and roadway reconstruction. Beginning in 2013 funding sources irnclude armual sales tax on constnrction. Progress Summary• TFds progrem has successTWly crompleted overlays,chip seals and complete reconsfructions since 2005. The program will focis on recorstruction in 2015 aM 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is ro impact to the street maintenance budget. Activky: (PreWous 2vrs ) 2014 VE 2075 Year End Funding Sources Prlor ro 2014 E9lmate T075 Budgat 2076 Butlget Pro ect Total Lacal Sfreet FurM 4,162,733 2.545.396 2.600.000 1.600,000 9.308.129 T2ns/er ln _ PropeRy Tax Sa/es Tax on Construction 6aM Proceeds Other Total Funding Sources 4,162,733 2,545,398 2,600,000 1,800,000 9,308,129 cav�a� Ecpenmwres: Design 453,750 400,000 400,000 300.000 1.253.750 Rlght ol Way Consfmction 3,708,983 2,145,398 2,200,000 1,300,000 8,354,379_ Totel FspentliOirec 4,t62,733 2,545,396 2,800,000 1,600,000 9,308,129 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofe I 2077 2078 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources: Loca/ Streef Fund 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 10,600,000 Trdns/er ln Property Tex _ Sa/es Tax on Construction - Bond Proceetls _ Other Total Fundtnp Sources 1,600,000 1,6D0,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 10,600,000 Capipl EzpendiWres: Deslgn 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,900,000 Right of Way _ Consmlction 1.300.000 1,300.000 1,300.000 1.300,000 8,700,000 Total FxpenNtures: 1,600,000 1,60D,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 10,600,000 G2Ms /Other Sourcas: 20152019 Sales tax Is increase0 by 7% per year - 83 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-26 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION - STREET PRESERVATION 2075 2018 2017 2018 2079 20Z0 Total CaoacttvProbcb: Nare NonLamcHvProlects: 1 15th Street SW Recmetructlon Caphal Costs 375,000 3,000,000 3,375',D00 Funtling Sources: Fund Belence - 75,000 500.000 575,000 Grants 300,000 2.500,000 2,SU0,000 Bond Proceeds 2 lake Tapps ParkwayPreservaLon Capital Cosfs 124.380 828,470 952,850 Funtling Sources: Fund 8alance 26,480 176,370 Z�Z,850 Gran15 97,900 652,100 - 750,000 Bontl Proceeds - - 3 Mnual Artarlal Street PreserveUon Program CaplhalCosS 1,700,000 600.000 700,000 1250,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 7,850,000 Funtling Sources: FunCBalance 1.700,000 600,000 700,000 1,250.000 1,800,000 1,800,000 7,850A00 UfiliryTax Bond Proceeds 4 MnuelArterlalCrackSealProgram Capital Cos6 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 600,000 Fundinp Sources: Fund Balance 100,000 700.000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Bontl Proceetls - 5 Auburn W ay N Preservetlon(22nd Street NE to 45N Street N� CaD�ml Cosls 160,000 1,775,000 7,935,000 Funtling Sources: Fund Balance 80.000 887,500 - 887,500 GfanS 80,000 887.500 987,500 8 15th SVeet NHNW Predervatlon(SR•1671q BN Street Nq Capital Cos6 135,000 1,500,000 - 1,635,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 67,500 750,000 817,500 CuanS 67,500 750,000 877,500 Note:Hnancial plan utllizes Me kllo�a+ng orderlor use o/Nnds to Bnance pro%ec1s:grenf 2vanues(it available),uh"Ifry tax revenues endluntl balance. SUMMARY: CAPRALCOSTS CapaclryProjects Non-CapadryProJects 1.960,000 2.734,360 3.503,470 4,350,000 1.900.000 _1.900,000_ ___ 16.347,850- TotalCosts 7,960,000 2,734,360 SSO3A70 4,350,000 7,900,000 1,900,000 78,347,8_50 RINDING SOURCES: FundBalance 1.880,000 1,681480 1.801.370 1,850,000 1,900,000 1,90D,000 11,012,850 U611ry7ax - - - G2nts 80,000 1,052,900 1,702.100 2,500.000 5,335,000 Bond Proceeds To�l Funding 1,960,000 2,734,380 3,503p70 4,350,000 7,900,000 1,900,000 18.347;85� 84 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capitai FacilRies Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2075-2020 Special Reveriue Fund ProjectTitle: 15th Street SW Reconstruction TIP # 7 Project No: cp�oaoc ProjectType: Preservation Project Manager• TBD LOS Corridor ID# 12 Description: 1Yus project will evaluate improvemerds to the Union Pacifc aFgrade rail-crossings as well as the vertical sigM distance to the triterurban Trail crossing to the west of the tracks. 1Yus project co�9d include pavemerrt preservation and may be accomplished through the PavemeM Preservation Progrem. A cost estimate for plannirg purposes is provided below. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Opereting Budget: llvs pmject will have ro impad on the operating budgetfor street maintenance. Activity: 2014 VE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources: Prlor [0 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2018 BUAget ProJect Tofal Artenal Preservation Fund Balence _ Grents- Unsecured(Fed,Stffie,Local) Utlllty Tax TraNic Mffgafion Furnis _ BwM ProceeUs Total Funding Sources: _ Capiql ErzpendlWres: Deslgn RigM W Way _ C.OnSINCf/0I1 Total EzpendiNres: _ Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2078 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources Artede/ Preservation Fund Balance 75,000 500,000 575,000 Grants- Unsecu�ed(Fed,State,LocaQ 300,000 2,500,000 2,800,000 Uhllty Ta< _ TraNic fv9tipation Funds Bond Proceeds Tofel Funding Souices: 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 Capifal Expenditures: Deslgn 375,000 375,000 Right W Way _ Constructlon 3,000,000 3,000,000 Tofal EzpendiWres: 375,000 3,000,000 3,375,000 G2rrts /Other Sources: 85 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capkal Facilities Plan,2015-2020 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lake Tapps Parkway Preservffiion TIP#22 Project No: cp�ooc STIP#AUB-TBD ProjectType: Non-Capacity, Preservatan Project Manager Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID#17 Deseription: The Lake Tapps Parkway Preservadon project will complete a patoh anii ove�lay"of pavemerrt between tlie AubiaNSumner City limit arid Lakeland Hills Way including all required ADA improvemerris to curb remps,sidewalks,and pedestrian signals. Progress Summary: Federal Grantwas sec�ued in 2014. Future Impacton Operating Budget: There is rw impact to the street maintenance budget. Activity: (PreNous Yrs) 2074 YE Zf175 Year Erid Funtling Sources: Prlor Oo 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2018 Budget Pro)eG Total Arterial Preservation FurM Balance 28,480 G2rrts-Secwed.Federal - W,900 - Utllity Tax - REET2 - BwM Proceeds Total FunAing Sources - • 124,380 - Capitel ExpendiLrres Oesqn Right o/ Way 124,380 r.OIIS�NChOII Total ExpendiWres: - 126.380 - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: AReria/PreseMation FuM Balance 176,370 - 202.850 G�aMs-Securetl Fetleral 852,100 750,000 Utility Tax - - - REET2 - Bond Proceeds Total Funding Sourcex 628,470 - - 952,650 Capifal ExpendlWres: Design - - - Rlght of Way - 124,380 Construction 828,470 .828,470 Total ExpendlWres 828,470 - - 952,BY GraMs I Ottrer Soufces: � 86 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL�STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Caprtal Facil'rties Plan,2015-2020 Special Revenue Funds ProjectTitle: Mnual Arterial Street Preservation Program TIP#35 Project No: cp1302 ProjectType: Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Description: Implemerrt regular pavemerrt maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified sVeets city�vide. These projects may include a combination of overlays,rebuilds,and spot repairs. This program is fiuxled through a 1% idility tax that was adopted by City Cour�cil during 2008. Progress Summary: Program cor�nues to successiully complete annual patching and overlay projects citywide. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Activity: (PreNous 2Vrs.) 2014 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources: Prlor M 2014 Estimate 2015 Butlget 2016 Budget ProJeU Tofal Artenal Preservatron Fund 1,367.984 2.620,579 1,700.000 600,000 5,688,563 Property Tax - _ Utiltty Tax - _ _ REET2 - . Bmd Proceeds Total Funding Soureex 1,367,984 2,620,579 7,700,000 800,000 5,688,583 Capital FxpenCiWres Design 36,838 100,000 50,000 50,000 238,838 RigM o( Way _ _ _ Construction 1,329,746 2,520,579 1,650,000 550,000 6,049,725 Total F�cpenditures 7,367,986 2,620,579 7,700,000 600,000 5,688,583 Forecasted Project Cost: rotai 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources: Artenal Pieservation Fund 700,000 1,250,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 7,&50,000 PropeRy Tar - - ' Utility Tax REET2 _ Bmd Proceeds Total Funding Sources 700,000 -7,250,000 1,800,000 1,80U,000 7,850,000 Caplfal Ezpenditures: Design 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Rrght o/ Way - - _ Construction 650,000 1,200,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 7,550,000 Tofal Expe,nditures: 700,000 1,250,000 1,800,000 1,800,000 7,850,000 Grarrts/Other Sources: g� City ofAu.burn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital Fac.ilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,2015-2020 Special Revenue Funds ProjectTitle: Annual Arterial Craek Seal Program TIP#36 ProjectNo: varies ProjectType: Non-Capacky, Preservatbn Project Manager. Jai Carter LOS Co��idor ID#N/A Deseription: trnplemeM reg�dar maiMenance of various classified streets by sealing newly fortned cracks. Sealing the cracks will prolong the life of the pavement by stopping waterfrom dreining into the sub�ase of the road. Progress Summary: Progrem cor�Gnues to successfuly extend pavement life pavement cirywide. Future Impact on Operating BudgeY. There is no impactto the street maintenanae budget. Activity: (PreNous Yrs) 2074 YE 20151'ear End Funding Sources: Prior to 2074 Estlmate 2015 Butlget 2016 Budget Projeet Total. ARenal Preservation Furrd 100,000 100,000 100,000 200;000' Util"Ry Tax - REET - - Ba�tl proceeds Total Funding Sources: - 700,000 100,OOD 100,000 200,000 Capital ExpenAilures Oesign 10,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 Right o/ Way co�srNot;o� eo,000 so.000 so.000 s�o,000 rorai �pend�tures: �oo,000 too,000 �oo,000 zoo,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Source_s: Arteria!Preservation Ftmd 100,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 600,000 Util'Ry Ta�c REET - - Ba�d procseds - Total Fundl�g Sources 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital ExpendlWres Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 70,000 60,000 Right o/ Way Canshuction 90,000 90,000 90,000 80,000 540,000 Tofal Erzpe_ntliWres 100,000 100,OOD 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grerrts/Other Sources: 8g Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capiqt Facilities Plan Six Year Capital FaciliHes Plan, 2075-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation (22nd Street NE to 45th Street NE) TIP # 70 Project No: cpx�cx Project Type: Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager. Jai Carter LUS Corridor ID# 21 Descrfption: The project proposes to grind and overlay Aubum Way N from tl�e 22nd Street NE to 45th Street NE. The project will restore 7.3 lane miles of pavemerrt, upgraiie 26 curb ramps to meet currerrt ADA staridard, as we as rertiove unused driveway openings as an upgrade to rron ADA compliarR pedestrian facilities. The project fiuids the design, coordination, permitting, and construction ofthe pavemeM preservation project. Progress Summary': Federal g2rrt was secured in 2014. Future Impact on Operatlng Budget: There is no impact to Uie street mairdenance budget. ActiVity: - m�a re Zo�s ree� e�d FunQing Sources Prlor m 2014 E91maM Y015 Butlget 2018 Butlget Project Total Arteria/ Presarvallon FurM 80,000 887,500 80,000 Grents- Securad Federal 80,000 887,500 80,000 REET _ BwM proceeds Tofal Funtling Sources: 760,000 1,775,000 160,000 Capipl Expendituras Design 160,000 180,000 Rtght o( Way Constrt�ction 1,775.000 Total Expenditures: - - 160,000 1,775.000 160.000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Tota I 2017 2016 2019 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources ARedal PreservetlonFund 967,500 Grents- Secwed Federal gg7 Spp REET _ BorM p�oceetls Topl Funtling Sources - 1,935,000 Capital ExpenAiLirex Design 160,000 Rlght oi Way Constmction .1.775.000 Total 6cpendf W res 1,935,000 Grants I Other Sources: 89 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capifal Faoilities Plan, 2015-2020 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 15th Street NE/NW Preservation (SR-167 to 8th Street NE7 TiP # 71 Projec[ No: cplooa ProjectType: Non-CapacRy, Preservation Project Manager Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# 9 Descrlptlon: The pmject proposes to grind and overiay 15th Street NWME irom the SR167 to Aubum Way�N; and grind and overlay Harvey Road NE from Aubum Way N to 8th SVeet NE. The project will restore 7.57 lane miles of pavemeM,upgrade 30 cub ramps to meet currerrt ADA stardard,as weil as remove �ised driveway openirgs as an�grade to non ADA compliant pedestrian facilities. The project fimds the design, coorcJination,permitting,aM ooristruction of the pavemerrt preservation project. Progress Summary• Federal grarR was secured in 2014. Fuhire Impact on Operating Budget: There is ro impact to the street maiMenance budget. Activity: 2014 YE 20t5 Year End FunEing Sources . -Prior_ro 2014 _Estlmate___ 2015 Budget M18 Butlget Projecl Total ARenel PreserveHon Fund 67,500 Grants- Securatl fea'eral 67,500 REET Bond proceeds Totnl Funtling Sources 735,000 - Capiial BcDentllWrex Design 735,000 135,000 Rlght o% Way Construction Total Expandilures: - 135,�0 - FoiecasteA Project Cost: Totel 2017 7A78 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcea Arterlal PreserveUonFund 750,000 817,500 Grants- Secured Fede2/ 750,000 817,500 REET - - Bond proceeds - Tofal Funding Sourcex 1,500,000 � — - 7;635,000 Capitel ExpendlNres Design 135,000 Rlght oI Way Constniction 1.500,000 1,500.000 Totsl ExpendlWres: 1;500,000 1,WS,OOP Grams I O[her Sourcas: 90 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE T-3 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS ProlecC 2018 - 2017 - - 2016 2019 2020 2021 Total 1 A Sbeet NW,Pha ae 1 $ 25,830 '$ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ 25,830 $ 154,980 2 AWS Petle4rfan Imp:Oogaootl to Flr 3 M SY�wt Untlerpaas 27.827 21.827 27,827 27,827 21.827 21,827 130.962 4 5177M SI Corrltlor Cepeclty 27,250 27250 27,250 27,250 27250 27,250 163.500 5 F Street S�DowMown fo Les Gow 4,'100 4,100 4,100 4,100 76,400 8 M Strwf NE,E Maln to 4th 1,500 'I,500 1,500 4,500 7 M Se SE 6 72tb St SE haHle Signe/ 6,600 6,600 6,600 19,800 8 ffih Straaf NEWitlening _ 9 Mervey 6 8fh SMeet NE _ 10 8N SYreet NE 8 SE 1MM SY Imp. 6,600 6,600 6,600 6.600 6,600 6,600 39,600 77 AuburnWeySdMStraet5Elmp. 12 A SY SE Non-motor/zotl Acces Imp. 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 15,000 73 AcaEemy Driw MuIH-Uw irall 5,000 5,000 10,000 14 /6YhPlanSRealfgnment 1,750 1.750 75 BNSF 3rtl Reil b�anlon Rtlxy Imp. _ 78 17AfA Aw SECorNdor 6 J20fh Imp. 17 1211b Aw SE Co�deor Imp. Aha a 3 18 R Streot Bype s 2.500 2.500 i 9 SE 3MM St Co.ritlor�mp. 20 AWS Lorrltlor Salery Improvemanb 21 TraHlcManagemertl LaMar Imp. 22 W�allsY Mxy ImP•15t�Sf NW to W Maln St. _ _ 23 LekeTappsPkxylTSEmenslan 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 24 AWS 6/2fh Sf SElnteracf/on Imp. 25 KeixyWeyStutly YB W Maln Sfreef hnprovements 27 EvergreenNeigMaSoleRoutesto Sehool /mp. 28 AWS Flr St SE to Neml ock St SE 9,300 9,300 9,300 9,300 9.300 9,300 55,800 29 Au6ur n Ave NE 6 3rtl Sf NE Pedestr fan Improvements 10 �Y St SE Corrttloi eeh Sf SE ro awS 8,000 B,o00 16,000 31 AWS Bype oRi verxa/k Dr ro SR 18 � 33 Y9th SYraet SE 6 R Sfreet SE 25,000 25,000 33 Len H/ll RO Segment t i 8,300 18,300 36,600 34 Lea Nlll Rtl Segment 2 35 �ae Nlll Rtl menf3 24,100 24,100 � 20,300 20,300 40,600 ;$ I$!NE 6 37na SY NE ROvntlabout 37 WVHwy Imp.SR-18 to 15th St SW 38 AutiurnWeyCorrltlorlmp 39 AuburnWeyWl4StNESignallmp _ 40 Main Sbeef Sfgnal UpAratles 47 A SYreat SE S/aty Imp. SYutly 42 S 7Ath WaNand M!ilgatlon 43 GtyMtlsPatle#rlanWostlng _ 4{ CltyWCaAr}eria/Blrye1�65e/ety Imp 65 Ilth 6 8 Sf NW Ral/�oatl Cro�ng Sa/etylmp 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 15,000 46 A SY NE 7e�eSr ien/mp - 500 500 500 1,500 47 Inte�urba n Trailhes tl Imp 48 f00M Ava SE 6 Grean R/wr!2E ffiu0y 4B A St SE 6 6th Sf SE SaNy Imp. 50 RS Dyno ml e M¢�ps Slgns 5,U00 5,000 5,000 15,000 57 AWS Slreafsa pa Impr ovaments 10,000 10,000 20,000 52 Cltywl tla TraMle Slgne I Se/ary Imp. 53 JRh St SE d A St SE TieNl c S/gna I 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 12,500 54 �oca I Straef Improvemenf Progiem (FunO f07) 54 15th Streat SW Recon4rueHon 58 LakaTeppsGarkxeyPrearvatlon 57 Arter/al5f.Preaervatlon (FunA fOSJ 58 Artw/al Lreek See I Prog.(Funtl f05� 59 Au6ur n Wy N Preawva Uon 60 17th St NEMW Prasrvetlon 7ota1 S 100,807 S to3,3o7 S 7o7,ao7 S tzt,007 E 1e2,8o7 S 235,957 S est,o92 91 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CI�I'Y OF � � �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 92 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER Current Facilities The City of Auburn water utility provides water supply, treatment, transmission, storage, distribution, ancl service connections to in-City residences and businesses. The City also provides water to the City of Algona and Water District #111 under wholesale agreements. The water system consists of wells, springs and interties for souroe; chlorination stations and corrosion control for treatment; pump stations, pressure reducing stations and pipelines for transmission; and steel and concrete enclosed reservoirs for storage. Table W-1, "Facilities Inventory', lists the facilities along with their current capacities and approximate locations. Level of Service (LOS) The City's Comprehensive Water Plan summarizes the design criteria and service polices for the City's water distribution system. i Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City of Auburn's water system anticipates five capacity projects in the amount of $9,387,170 and twenty-three non-capacity projects totaling $21,444,895 for a 6-year planning expectation total of $30,832,065. The firiancing plan is shown in Table W-2 followed by individual worksheets showing the project details. The capacity projects will increase water supply quantities, storage, and distribution for growth of retail customers. The non-capacity projects will provide for pipeline improvements and replacements, delivery pressure improvements, water quality enhancements, comprehensive and resource management planning, pump station upgrades, telemetry system improvements, and meter upgrades. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table W-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $16,200 are forecasted for water supply and distribution facilities during the six years 2016 —2021 93 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABL-E W-1 Facilities Inventory Water Facilities - -•-C�TYOFAUBt1RN.V1IATER'.SXS?EM' _----------,----_--'-- CAPACITY PACILITY WATER RIGHT (MGD -max rate) LOCATION . - — Water Su I : Coal Geek Springs CeRifipte 857 9.70�2.52>' 3401 Stuck RiverRd Well 1 Certifiqte 3560-A 3.17 1136 M St SE Well 2 G1-00277 C 3.46 1109 5th St NE Well 3A G1-23629 C 4.03 401 37th St SE Well38 (IndudedAbove) (IncfudedAbove) 40137thStSE Well 4 G1-20391 C 4.03 950 25th St SE Well 5 G1-23633 C 1 44 5530 James Ave SE Well �A (Included Above) (Included Above) 5401 Olive Way SE Well58 (lncludedAbove) (IndudedAbove) Westendof62ndCtSE Well 6 (Supplemental to Wells 1,2, 3A, 3B, 4) 5.04 (supplemental) 1109 5th St NE Well 7 (Suppfemental to Wells 1,2, 3A,38, 4) 5.04 (supplemental) 405 E St NE West Hill Springs Claim (1973 File Date) 0.9 1900 15th St NW Ezt upply Total (MGD) 26.73 Available foi Use 24.21 'Denotes deduction of 1,7W gpm(OU2,824 ao-fVyr)to cortpy with the provisions of the tuLckleshoot-Aubum.Stipulated Agreerrent. cnPaarv FACILITY (MGD) LOCATION SERVICE AREA Intertie Tacoma 8 Street NW 3.2 3240 B St NW Valley Service Area Tacoma 132nd Ave SE 3.2 29598132nd Ave SE Lea HiII Servrce Are"a Intertie Tobl (MGD) 6.4 CAPACITY FACILITY (MG) _LOCATION _ S_ERVICE AREA _ Storaae Facilities: - - - - Academy Resenroir 8A 1.0 5031 Aubum Way S Academy Service Area Academy Resenroir 88 1.5 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Seivice Area Lakeland Hills Resenroir 5 1.0 1326 57th Dr SE Lakeland Hills Svc,Nea Lakeland Hitls Resenroir 6 1.0 5718 Francis Ct SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Lea Hill Resenroir 4A 1.0 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hil!Service Area Lea Hill Reservoir 48 1.5 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea HiII Service Area Valley i2eservoir 1 5.0 2003 Auburn Way S Valley Service Area VaUey Resenroir 2 3.6 32115 105th Pface S Valley Servrce Area Storage Tota/ (MG) 15.6 94 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY (GP_M) LOCATION Booster Pum Stations: Academy 1 2 pumps 800 2004 Aub urn.Way S Ac.ademy 2: 2 pumps 1,500 2004 Auburn Way S Academy East: 6 pumps 2,820 5031 Auburn WayS Green River 4 pumps 4,680 29621 Green RiverRd SE Infertie: 7 pumps 4,830 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2,100 10406 Lea Hil�Rd SE Lak eland Hills. 5 pumps 3,200 1118 57th Place SE Wildemess Game Farm Pk 2 pumps 1,050 2401 Stuck RiverRd Terrace View. 3 pumps 1,500 6134 Alexander Place SE CAPACITY Primary Valve FACILITY (PSI - InIeUOuUet) LOCATION I Pressure Reducrna Stations. Serves Valley Pressure Zone: Howard Road CCF #1011-10 82/65 Howard Rd Howard Road CCF By-Pass #?011-20 - Howard Rd(Bypass) 25th Street SE #1110-10 (Oifline) - 25th St SE&K St SE Rivervielk #1111-20 90/50 27th St SE&27th Place SE Riverwdlk #1111-10 109/55 Riverwalk Dr SE&Howard Rd Serves Lea Hill: Amber View North #711-10 150/65 105th PI SE&320th PI Amber View South #711-20 142/60 106th PI SE Near Reservoir 2 Carriage Square Lower#611-10 16�65 Lea Hill Rd SE Carriage Square Middle #611-20 140/65 Lea HiII Rd 8 106 PI Cairiage Square Upper #611-30 14�60 Lea Hilf Rd& 107 PI Cobble Creek Lower #411-20 86/40 SE 304th PI&SE 101st Place Cobble Creek Upper #411-10 94/55 104th Ave SE(Soufh of 303rd Road) Lea HiII #412-10 90/45 SE 298th Place & 109 Ave SE Lea Hill #412-30 N/C 300 Block & 108th Ave SE Lea Hill #511-10 87/45 304th St SE West of 108th Ave Lea Hi!l #512-10 80/50 304th St. SE West of 112th Ave Serves Academy: AubumWaySouth #1011-30 130/80 2003AuburnWayS Aubum Way South #?114-10 130/80 4500 Auburn Way S Serves Jannsen Addition: Jariris.en #1296-10 72/58 6100 Block &35th Way SE TABLE W-1 (continued) 95 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Facilities Inventory Water Facilities caaacinr Primary Valve FACILITY _ _ _ (PSI.- InIeUOuUet)_ . _ __ __ __ _LOCATION____ _ Serv'es Cake/arid Hills- - - - - - -- Lak elarid HiNs #1309-10 105/55 hfll Pond Or � Oravetz Rd Lak e/and Hilfs #1310-10 130/55 A�fll Pond Dr & A4ll Pond Loop Lak eland Hills #1409-10 N/C Oravetr & Lak eland Hifls Way Lak eland Hills #1409-20 120/56 47th SE & Lak eland Hills Way Lak eland Hills #1409-30 95l70 Lak eland Hills Way& Lak e/and Hills Lp Lak e/and Hills #1409-40 84/55 Mfll Pond Dr & Lak eland Hills Way Lak e/and Hills #1410-10 103/50 4900 Block 8 hfll Pond Or lek eland Hills #1410-20 N/C 51st SL SE east of Hfll Pond Loop Lak eland Hills #14>0-30 125/62 Nathan Ave & Highland Dr Lak eland Hills #1410-40 82/55 Quincy Ave N of 53�d St SE Lak eland Hilfs #1411-10 80/42 Bennett Ave 6 S6th Ave SE Lak e/and Hills #1411-20 82/55 5314 Bennett Ave SE Lek eland Hills #1411-30 155/73 5100 KerseyWay Lak e/and Hills #1411-40 92/52 54th St SE Lak eland Hills #1411-50 85/44 WestlyAve SE Lak eland Hills #1412-10 82/55 5539 Franklin Ave SE Lak eland Hills #1509-10 174/60 Terrace ViewLoyer(6170) Lek eland Hills #1509-20 160�73 Terrace ViewMddle (5960) Lak eland Hills #1509-30 138/47 Terrace View Upper(5B10) Lak eland Hills #1509-40 230/90 Terrace View& AlexanderPlsce SE Lak eland Hills #1510-10 N/C Lak eland Hills Way& Evergreen Way WC - Nor m all Clos e tl caPAcinr FACIUTY (GPM) LOCATION Corrosion Confrol � oward Road 5,550 2101 Howard Rd SE Fulmer Field 9,375 1113 Sth St NE Chl rination Sfations: Coal Creek Springs Station 5,000 (gravity feed) 3401 Stuck River Rd West Hill Springs�Station 625 (gravity feed) 1900 15tli St NW Well 4 2,600 950 25th St SE Well 56 600 1100 63rd St SE Wel1 5A 180 5401 Olive Ave SE - -- -- --- - BRi4UNW - D ' - ----' - - —_ � FACILITY - - -- CAPACITY LOCATION VYater S'u l: iaunw�od Satellite #1 0.03 MGD 4501 47th St SE ra Facilities: raunwDod Satellite 1 0.03 MG 4501 47th St SE Boosfer Bum Stations: raunwnod:3 Pumps 2.0 GPM 4501 47tli St SE 96 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Tae�e w-z CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING WATER DIVISION 2015 2018 2017 2078 2019 2020 Total Caoacitv Proiects: t Wellllmprovements Capital Cosis 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 50,000 50,000 -Bond Proceeds 2 Filmer Well Re.ld Improyements CaD��I Cos is 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - _ . Bond Proceeds 50,000 50,000 3 Cascade Water Nllance Water Purchase Capital Costs 532,560 532,560 532,580 2,164,490 3,762,170 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 532,560 532,560 532,560 2,184,490 3,762,170 Bond Proceeds 4 AeademyPump SWtion#7 Pump RepalcemeM Capital Costs - - 925,000 1,200,000 2,725,000 Funding Sources. Water Fund - _ Bond Proceeds - 925,000 1,200,000 - 2,725,000 5 Coal Qeek Springs Rehabilitatlon Capital Cos Ls 800,000 2,600,000 3,400,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund _ _ . Bond Proceeds 800,000 2,600,000 3,400,000 Subtotal.Caoackv Prdeets: Capital Costs 100,000 1,457,560 2,532,560 3,132,560 2,764,490 9,387,170 NorvCauacitv Prdscfs• 8 treen Rher PS EmergencyPower Capi�al Cosis 90,000 800,000 690,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 90,000 600,000 - 690,000 Bond Proceeds _ 7 Wlell 4 Power 8 Chlorination Capifal Cosis 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - _ Bond Proceeds 50,000 - 50,000 8 WeU Inspeetion and RetlevelopmerR Program Capital Cos ts - 150,000 - 150,000 300,000 Funding Sources. WaOer Fund - 150,000 150,000 300,000 Bond Proceeds - 97 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TAB�E W-2(continued) 2015 2D76 2077 2018 2079 2020 Total Nor�Caoaeltv Proiects: 9 Water Repair&ReplaeertierNs Capifal Costs - - 200,000 1,700,000 260,000 1,900,000 4,060,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - 1,700,000 260,000 1,800,000 3,860,000 Borid Proceeds - 200,000 - - - 200,UOD 10 Lakeland Mlls Rese�r S ImprovemeMs Capifal CosLs 735,000 - - - - 735,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 735,000 - - - - - 735,000 Bond Proceeds - - 11 CompreFrensive Water Plan Capifal CosLs 50,000 - - - 425,000 475,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 50,000 - - - 425,000 475,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - 12 MIT Master Meters Capital Costs 400,000 - - 400,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 400,000 - - - 400,000 13 Street Wlky Improvements Capital CosLs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Furiding Sources Water Fund 150,000 100,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,250,000 Bond-Proceeds. . 350,000_ 400,000 - - �50,000 14 Laa FGII PRV Station Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 400,000 - - 450,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - Bond Proceeds 50,000 400,000 - - - 450,000 15 Water Meter 8 Billing System Improvemerks Capifal Cosis 1,000,000 1,000,000 1.500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 8,500,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 1.000.000 1.000,000 1,500.000 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 8,500,000 18 Utlikies Reld Operadoris Center Capital Costs 300,000 - - - 300,U00 Funding Sources Water Fund 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Other-SewerFund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Olher-Stortn Fund 100.000 - - - 700,000 17 Valley AC Main Replace Capital Cosfs 50,000 - - - - - SU,OOU Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 50,000 - - 50,000 98 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE W-2(continued) 2015 2018 2U17 2018 2019 2U20 7otal NorFCaoacitv Proiects: 18 BNSF Utility Crossing Capital Costs 50,000 - - 50,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - Bond Proceeds 50,000 - - - 50,000 19 SCADA UPgrades Capifal CosLs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 10,000 - - - 10,000 BonH Prooeeds - - - - 20 West F611 Spri�s Improvemerrts Capihal CosCs 455,000 - - - - 455,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 455.000 - - _ _455,000_ 21 Reservoir Seismic Rehabllltation Capital CosLs - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 400,000 Bond Proceeds - - 22 Lea Ffill 132nd Ave Distribution System Modificatfons Capital CosLs 400,000 - - 400,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - . Bond Proceeds 400,000 - - - - 400,000 23 Auburn WaySouth Rooding Improvements Phase 2-77tF�Street SE Capital Cosis 850,000 - - - 850,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 161,000 - - - 187,000 Bond Proceeds 669,000 - - - 669,000 24 Auburn Way South-Dogwood to Rr Capital CosGs 34,895 - - 34,895 Fundin9 Sources Water Fund 34,895 - - - 34,895 Bond Proceeds - - - - . 25 Auburn W ay South-Rr to Hemloek Capifal Cosfs 30,000 - - - 30,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 30,000 - - - 30,000 Bond Proceeds - - _ _ 26 Auburn Way South-Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood Capital Cos45 55,000 - - - 55,000 Funding Sources Water Fund 55,000 - - - - 55,000 Bond Proceeds 99 City ofAuburn Draft CapitaZFacilities Plan TABLE W-2(continued) so�s. zo�s_ zott 2078. _ 2019 2020_ _ _ Total NorfCaoaeHv Proiects: - - - -- - - - - ---- - - - 27 Reservoir PaiMing Capital Cosfs - - 1250,000 7,250,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - - - - 1:250,000 1,250,000 Bond Proaeeds - - - - - 28 24"White Pover Gossing Capital Costs - 450,000 450,000 - - - 900,000 Funding Sources Water Fund - - 450,000 - - 450,000 Bond Proceeds - 450.000 - - - 450,000 SuMotal. NorrCaoacitv Proieets: Capital Costs 5,079,695 2,350,000 2,990,000 4,400,000 2,570,000 4,775,000 21,444,895 SUMMARY: CAPRAL COSTS Capaa_ly ProjecLs 100,000 - 1 457,560 2,532,560 3,132,560 2,164,490 9,387,170 Non-Capacity Projects 5,019,895 2,350,000 2,990,000 4,400,000 2,510,000 4,175,000 21 444,895 Total Cos1s 5,719,695 2,350,000 4,447,560 8.932,580 5,842,580 6,339,490 30,832,066 FUI�ING SOURCES: Water Fund 1,395,895 100,000 1,822,560 3,432,560 1,542,560 6,339,490 14,633,065 Other-Sewer Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Other-Storm Furid 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Bond Proceeds 3,524,000 2,250,000 2,625,000 3,500,000 4,100,000 - 15,999,000 Total Funding 5,179;895 2,350,000 4,447,560 8,932,560 5,642,560 6,339,490 30,832,065 100 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATERFUND (430) CapifalFaeilitlesPlan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,201Y2020 Enferprise Funds ProjectTitle: Weil 1 ImpfOVemBnts Project No: Cp0915 ProjectType: CapaCity ProjectManager SW@@tltlg Desaip;ion: Hydro geologic evaluation of epsting v.ell conditiors, construction of transmission main to Howard Road Corrosion Control Treatrnerrt Facility for aeration, and construction of building impro�.emenls to house chlorine disiMection equpmeM and an emergency generator. Progress Summary• Trarumission maln is complete. Well impro�emerris will bid in 2014 with construction completed in 2015. Future Impact on The arrwal mainGenance cost is estimated to be approzmatey$1,800. Activity: 2014 YE 2075 Year End Funding Sources: PHor ro 2014 F�mate 2015 Budget 2U78 Budget _Prqeet Tofal UnresMcledWeterReYanue 1,g29,g88 1,487,9t3 50,000 �3,367,901 UnresMcted Storm Reeenue BorM Proceeds Other(PWTF/oan) 7,799,553 7 799 553 Total Funtling Sourcas 7,829,888 3,287,466 50,000 5,787,d54 GPibl ExpBndiWrex Design 673,719 67,000 7qp,7�9 R/ght d Way EnNronmente/ 920 g2p CanstrucNon t.t55.349 3.170,466 50,000 4.375.Bt5 Total Expendiwres: �.829.988 3.237.466 50.000 5.777.454 Foreoasted P�oject Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 207i-Y010 Funtling Sourws: - Unrestncted Water Revenue r�p ppp UnresMcted Slwm Revertue _ Bond Proceetls Other(PWTF loan) Tofal FunOfng Sourees: 50,000 Capibl Expendlh�res: Design Poeht o/ Way ConSWCf%on SO,000 Total Expenditures 50,000 Grents/Other Sourcm: IQI City ofAuliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plarc WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilitfes Pian Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Tine: Fulmer Well Field Improvements Project No: ep1107 Project Type: Capacity Project nnanager Fenhaus /Vondrak Descriptbn: Evaluate Wells 2, 6�and 7 and the Fulmer Field Corrosion CorNrol TreatmeM Facilily ro assess the supply and treatment capacity of the ewsting facilities and infrastructure. The evaluadon will incl�de an assessmeM of iridividuaJ and total well s�py capacities, alorg with a review of the VeatmeM facility operatirg and control paremeters. The evaluation will aiso incorporete recommendations for facility improvemerrts. Prog�ess Summary• StWy is being conducted. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significarRimpaci Activity. 2074 YE 2075 Veer End Funtling Sources Prlor ro 2014 Estlmale 2075 6uE et 2018 Budget ProJeet TWaI UnrestdctedWeterRe�enue 2,855 4,899 - 7,854 Grents(Fed,Siate.Locel) - BontlP�oceetls 448,842 1,456,158 50,000 1,955,000 Other Total Funtling 9ou`ces: 451.897 1.461.757 50.000 1.982.854 Cepiml ExpendlWres: Design 451.697 1.46'I.'157 50,000 1,982.854 Poght d Way CO/1SfNCIJO/1 Tobl Fi�pendiWres 451,897 1.461,757 50,000 1.882,854 Foreoasted ProJect Cost: Tofal 2017 2016 2019 2020__ _ 201i2020 Funding Sourcos: � UmeS[dLfed WBfB(RBvenuB GraMs(Fed,Stete,Locap BwW Procesds `.+�.� Otfrer Total Funtling Soutcee: 50,000 Capipl Ex�penCftures: Deslgn 50,000 R/ght o/ WaY ' CO�SfNGtiOI� Total Ezpendimro8: 50.00� Grents/Other Souices� � 1�2 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Faciiities Pwn Six Year CapiFal Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Tiue: Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: CapaCity Project Manager: TBD Description: Financirg to purchase water from adjacent purveyors to meet projected demand based on agreements with Cascade Water Alliance. Courcil approved the agreemeMs for permanerrt and reserve wholesale supply in September 2013. Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activily. za�s re so�s vear ena Funtling Sourcas: Prlor ro 2014 Estlmate. 2015 Budgat 2018 Bud et Projec!To}al Unrestncfed Water Revenue - _ Grants(FeqStete,Local) Bond Proceeds Other TOWI FunCing Sourcex . CaOibl ExpandfWres: Weter Supp/y Charges RlghfW Wey CO/IS�NLtIOII TOUI EYPGIIA14lflS: _ Forecasted Project Cost: Total 20t7 2018 2019 2020 _20152020 FunAing Sourwa: UnresMctetlWaterRevenue 532,560 532,560 532,560 2,164,490 3,762,170 Grants (Fed,Stete,LocalJ Bontl Proceeds ane. TOWI Funding Sources: 532,580 532,560 532,560 2,164,480 3,782,170 W piUl F�cpantliWres: Weter SuDP�Y�ayes 532,560 532,560 532,560 2,764,490 3,762,170 W'ghf d Way ConStNction TOtal ExPendlWres: 532.580 532.56U 532.580 2,164.490 3.762.170 Grants/Other Souices: 103 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Peciiities F�an Sia Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds ProjectTUe: Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement Project No: CpXXXX ProjectType: Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Increase the punp station capacityto meet peak demands and fire fbw requirements. Progress Summary• Plarined Future hnpact on Operating Budget: No significaMimpact. Activity: 2014 YE 2075 Veer Entl FunOing Sources PHor ro 2014 E9imate 2015 Butlge! 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestncted Water Revenue - GreMs(Fed,Stafe,Locaq 6wM Proceeds Otnor Total Funding 9ources: - Capidl ErzPen0ltures: Des/gn - RigM ol WaY - CO/ISINGtlO/I Total ESPgnCiNres: - Forecasted Projeet Cost: roml 2017 2018_ 2019 _2020____ 20752020 Funtling Sources: UniesMcted Water Revenue GiaMs(Fed,Sfefe,LocaQ - BondPioceetls 925,000 1,200.000 2,125.000 Oflrer Totsl Funding Sourcea: 925,000 1.200,000 2.125,000 Caplal ExpendlNres: Des/gn 325,000 325,000 Rlghf d Way - ConSt/uction 600,000 1.200.000 1,800,000 Total FxpendiNrex 925,000 1,200.000 2.125,OM Grants I Other Sources: 104 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Sfi Year CapHal Pacilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Projea Tne: Coal Creek Springs RehabiliWtion Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Rehabilitation of ihe Coal Creek Springs middle collector will improve capacity of the spnngs resulting in greater utilization of the water right. Progress Summary: Planned FuWre Impad on Operating Budget: No significantimpact Activky. 2010 YE 2015 Vear Entl FunAing Sourcea: Prior fn 20t4 Estlmate 2075 BuOget 2016 Butlget ProJect.Tofal Unres7ncfedWaterRevenue � - Grants(Fed,Steta,Loce/) PWTFL Bontl Proceeds Total Fundfng Sources: _ CapNal EuPentli4�res Design R/ghf ol Way Consln�ction roai Exvana�wras: - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funtling Sources ' ' Unrastnctetl Waler Revenue Grants(Fed,Stete,Local) _ PWTFL BondPioceeds 800,000 2,600,000 3,400000 7oh1 Funding Sources B00,000 2,800,000 3,400,000 CaPltal F�cpanditurea Desi9� 500.000 500�000 Poghf d Way _ Constniction 300,000 2,600,000 2,900,000 Tofal ExpenGihrea 800,000 2,600,000 3,400,000 Grants/Other Sources' ��5 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) CaplNal Facllities Plan Six Year Capital Facllfties Plan, 2015-2020. . Enterprise Funds Project rtie: Green River Pump Station Emergency Power Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Arianager TBD Description: Construction of facility improvemerds to house an emergency generator and associated electrical equipmeM. Progress Summary• Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: The arvural mairrtenance cost is estimated to be approbmatey$600. Activity• 2014 YE 2075 Year End FunCing Sources Prfor W 2074 EctlmaLe 2015 BUC et 20t6 BudOet Project Tofal Unresfdcfed Weter Revenue - Grants(Fed,Stffie,Locel) - Bontl P�oceeds Other Total FunAing$oureea Caplfal Erzpenifldirea Design - R/ght o/ Wey Ci0/ISINCfIOII TMeI Ficpendilures: - Forecas;ed ProJect Cost: Tofal zo�i 2o�e zoye zozo io�s�ozo FunCing Sources: UnRShiCtBdWelerRe�erruB 90,000 600,000 690,000 G�antS(Fed,Stete,Locel) eond Pioceetls Ofher 7otal Funding$ources 90.000 800,000 89D.000 Capltal Ezpentliwras: Design 90,000 �.� FNghf d Way - Construction 600,000 600,000 Tofal6cpenditures: 90,000 800,000 890,00 Gr&Ms/Other Sonrcesi - 106 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) CapiWl Facilities Plan Six Year_Capifal Pacili[ies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds arojea Ttle: Well 4 Power and Chlorination Project No: C512a0 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager WCkst�Om Description: Construct a new building at the Well 4 site to house a diesel-fueled standby generator and new hypochlorite disinfection equipmeM. Progress Summary: Design will be complete arxJ project will bid in 2014 with consbuction completed in 2015. Future Impact on Opereting Budget: The annual mairrtenance cost is estimated to be appropmatey$600. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year EnA Funding Sourcas Prior b 2014 Estlmate 2015 Butl9et 2016 BuAget ProJeet Total UnresMcted Water Revenue - 7 738 172,450 179,568 Grents(Fed,Stete,Locel) Bond Proceeds 204.930 944.070 50.000 �.199,000 OfhBi Total Funding Sourcec 272,088 1,116,520 50,000 1,378,588 Capital ExpendlWrea Design 212.068 40.000 252,066 Right o/ wey CanStNCf/on 7.076�520 50.000 1.126.520 Tofal Expenditurcs: 272.068 1.t18,520 50.000 7.378,588 Pore¢asted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2019 Z020. 207S2U20 Funtling Sources: - - UnresMctetl Water Revenue Grants(Fed,Sfete,local) Bond Proceeds 50,000 OfMr 7ofe1 Funtling Sourcas: 50.000 Gapipl EzpendiWres: Design Right of Way r.0/IS�NCl/011 �� roai�penmwres: w,000 GraMS!Other Sources. 1�7 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capkal FacilRies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Prbject Title: Well Inspection and RedevelopmenfiProgram Project No: cpxxx�c Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Program for inspection and redevelopmeM of suppy wells ard spri_rgs necessary to ersure production at mawmum capacity for efficierrt utiliration. Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significard irripact. Activity• zo�a re m�e rear ena FunAing Sourcea Prirn b 2014 6tlmate 2075 BUEget 2076 Budget Project Total Unrestdcted Weter Ravenue GraMs(Fetl,Stete,LocaQ Bontl Piocaeds OtMr Tohl Funding Sourcea - GPlfal Fspontlib�rea Design Poghf d Wey Constructim Tofal Fi�pandlNres: - Forecasted ProJect Cost: rorai zon zo�e _ .zo�s_ zoxo :o�szozo Funtling Sourcea Un2sMctedWate/Revenue 150.000 7W,000 300,000 Giants(Fed,Stete,LocaQ - BaM Pioceeds Other Total Funding Sourcar 150.000 150,000 300.000 Cepihl ErzDentliwrec Des/gn - RigM d Wey Constructlon 150.000 �50,000 300,000 Total ExOandlWrea 750.000 150.000 300,000 Gran[s/Olher Sources: 1�8 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Projea rtle: Water Repair & Repiacements Project No: CpXXxx Projea Type: Non-Capacity (R8R) Project Manager Va�ious Description: Distribution system repair and replacement projects required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. ProjecLs will be coordinated with the Local Street Program and othar uGlity projects. Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significantimpact. Activity: -- -- 2014 YE 2015 Vear EnA Funding Sources Prior ro 20t4 Eqimale 2015 Budget 2016 ButlOet. Pro ect Tofal UnresMcfedWaterRevanue 70,000 - " 70;000 Grants(Fed,Slete,Lxel) Bontl Pioceeds Other Total Fundln0 Sources: 70,000 70,000 Gpinl Ecpen6turec Desi9� 70.000 70.000 Rlghf oI Wey CO/151NCilOn Toql Fspendituroa: 70,000 70.000 Forecasted�Project Cost: - Total 2017 2018 20�8 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcas: UrnesMctetlWaterRevenue 1,700,000 260,000 7,900,000 3,880,000 Granfs(Fed,Stefe,Local) BorrdProceetls 200,000 200,000 Other Total Funding Sourcas 200,000 1,700,OU0 260,000 7,900,000 4,060,000 Gpipl ExpentllWrea: Design 200,000 260,000 460,000 RigM d Wey Construction 1.700.000 1.900 000 3.600.000 7ofa1 ErzpendiWres: - - 200,000 t,700,000 2W,000 1,900,OOD 4,060,000 Grants/O[her Sources: 109 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities P[an WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilRies Plan Six Year Capftal Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: l:akeland Hills Reservoir 5 Improvements Project No: cp0765 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager La�Son Descrip£wn: Pairrt tlie interior and eiQerior to Preserve the life of the resenroir add mipng equipmentfor improved water quality and safety improvemerRs includirg seismic isolation valoe and new ladder Progress Summary: Design wili be completed in 2014, with corstruction completed in 2015. Fuhire Impact on Ope�ating Budget: No significaM Impact Activity: 2016 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sourcen: Prior to.2014 Estlmate_ . 2015 Budget ___2016 BUAget_ Prb�ect Total UnresMctetlWaterRevenue � � 43,334 735,000 778,334 Grants(Fed,Stete,Local) Bond Pioceeds 5.664 7A4.336 750.00D O1�iBf Tofal Funding Soureea: �.�8 744.338 735.000 7,528,334 CaPltal FspenCltures: Deslgn 48.998 96.000 144,998 Right d Way - Cbnstruction 648.936 735,000 1.383,336 Total F�cpandituros 46.998 744.338 735.000 - � _ � 1.528.334 Forewsted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 FunCing Sources: Unrestncted Wafer Revenue 735,000 Gran�s(Fed,Stefe,Loce/) - Bond Proceeds Offrer Total Funding Sourcex 73S,OU0 Capltal EupendiWraa: Des/gn - RfgM d Way - ConsWction 735,000 Tofal Expentliturex 735,000 Grants/-Other Sowces: 11� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year.Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds aroject TiUe: Comprehensive Water Plan Projea rro: cp7403 Projact Type: Non-Capacity Projed Manager• Fenhaus Description: Update the Comprehensive Water Plan as required by Washington State Departmerrt of Heatth. Plan is updated every 6 years. Progress Summary: Submit draft report to WasFurigton Departmerrt of Health before December 31 2014 Futuie ImpacE on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Activity• 2014 YE 2075 Year Entl Funding Sourcas: Prlor ro 2014 EstlmaOe 20�5 Budget 2018 Budget . _P.ro eet Total UnrestnctedWeterRevenua 384,643 50,000 43M1;649 G/eMs(Fed,SlBfe,LAca1) BdM Proceetls Other Tofal Funding Sourtes 386,663 50,000 qyti,5q3 CePibl Ezpenditures: DesiBn 384,643 50,000 434,643 R;gnr d wey _ consrruorron 7ofa1 E�[pend(turea 384,863 50,000 434;g43 Foreaasted Project Cost: - - 7otal 2017 2078. 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sourus: UniestActeCWaterRevenue 425,000 475,000 Grenfs(Fetl,State,Lwe/) Bontl Procaeds aner Total Funding Sources: 625,000 475,000 Gpihl Expentlitures: Design 425.000 475.000 ,4;gnr a way C.0115t2Lf1011 Total FxpendiWres: 425,000 475,000 � G2nts/Other Samces: 111 City ofAu.burn Draft Capital Facilities Pla.n WATER FUNU (430) Cap'�I Facilkles Plan S& Yeai Capital FacilRies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Master Meters Project No: wabd03 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Vstall master meters to Muckleshoot hdian Tribe properties to ease accowt administration. P�og►ess Summary: Design of master meter stations completed in 2014 with constrvction in 2015. Future Impact on OperaUng Budget: No significarrtimpact /►ctivily: - - 2014 VE 2015 YeOr Entl Funtling Sources: Prlor b 2074 F9lmale 2015 BUAget 2016 Budget Projeet Tobl Unreslnctetl Water Re�enue 80,000 80,000 Grents(Fed,Sfete,Locel) - Bond Proceeds 400,000 400,000 OMar Tofal FunAing Sources BO,OOD 400.000 �80.000 Gpibl Ezpentlih�ras: Desi9n 80.000 80,000 FSgM d Way - ConSfNGf%on 400,000 400,000 Total EzpanAiturea 80,000 400,000 d8U.000 Foiecasted Project Cost: rom� 2ot7 201a 2019 2020 2otS2020 Furiding Sources: Unrestncfetl Water Revenue Giants(Fed,Stete,Local) - eond Proceetls 4�.� Other Tobl Funding 3ources: � 400,000 Capital Fxpenditurea Deslgn - �ynr d way consrN�rron a�.�o Total Ezpenilidiree: � � " �0.� GraMs 1 Other Sourcas: 112 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faellities Plan,2075-2020 Enterprise Funds Projectree: Street Utility Improvements Project No: CpxxxX ProjectType: Non-Capacity Project Manager. T BD Description: Water rtiain improvemer�s in coordination with the Sa�.e oir Streets(SOS)program and general arterial stree[ improvemerrts. Progress Summary• P�anned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No sfgnificarrtimpact Aetivity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: PAor to 2014 E9imate 2075 BuAget 2076 Builget _Project Total UnrestnctetlWaterRe.�enue 500,000 150,000 100,000 650,000 G2nts(Fed,State,Local) _ Bond Pioceeds 350,000 400,000 350,000 Other Tofal Funding Sources 500,000 500.000 500,000 1,000,000 Caplql Expenditures: Deslgn RigM W Way _ Consfruction 500,000 500,000 500,000 t,000.000 Tofal Ezpentliturea 500,000 500.000 500,000 7,000,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tobl 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources Un2sMctedWeterRevanue 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,250,000 Granrs(Fed,srate,Locaq Bond Proceeds �yp ppp Ofher Toial FunEfng Sourpc: 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Gpipl Expenditures Design _ Right d Way Constructlon 500,000 500 000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Total6cpentlitures: 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Grarrts/Ot�er Sourcas 113 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Vear_Capital .FacilRies_Plan,_20152020__ EMerprise Funds Project TiUe: Lea Hill PRV Statfon Improvements Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Replace pressure 2ducing valve statlors in the Lea Hill area. Progres"s Summary• Planrred Future Impact on Opereting Budget: No significantimpact. Activity: - - — 2o�a re zo+s rea.E�a Funding Sources: Prlor b 2014 Ec6mam 2015 BuABet 2078 Budget ProJeet Total Unrestnctad Water Revenue - GiaMs(Fed,§tata,Locaq - Baitl P�oceetls 50,000 400,000 50,000 Other Toml FunAing Sources � � 50.000 400,000� 50.000 Capital Expentliturex Des/gn 50,000 50.000 Rlght d Way Consfruction 400.000 Total Expantlitums 50.000 400,000 50,000 Fdrecasted ProjeofCost: Totll T017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funtling Souims: UnresMctetl Wafer Re�errue - Grants(Ferl,Stete,Loceq - Bond Proceea's d50,000 Other Total FunAfng Sources - - ' '-' - '450.000� Capltal F�cpandlturex . . Design �.� RfgM of Way - ConSf2Ction 400,000 7ofal E�cpenCltures � -� 450,000 Grants I Other Souices: 114 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) CapRal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facllltles Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Tine: Water Meter 8 Billing System Improvements Project No: ep1317 Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Conduct a study to detertnine which recent improvemeMs in automated metering tecMology,generaly referred to as Advanced Metering 6ifrastructure(AM�, awuld best benefit the Gity and construct selected improvemerrts. Benefits include more accurate meter reads, daiy informatlon for quicker detection of leaks, and improved efficiencyof billing operations. Progress Su:mmary• Study in progress. hsfallation of ineters and metering infrastnicture to begin in 2015 Future Impabt on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Act'rvity. 2014 YE 2015 Vear Entl Funtling Sourcas Prlor Eo 2074 E�mate 2075 Butlget 2076 BuCget ProJeR TOTaI Unrestncted Watar Reronue _ GraMs(Fed,Stafe,Lweq _ BondPioceeds 25,753 50,247 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,076,000 Other Tobl Funding Sources: 25,753 50,247 1,000,000 1,000,000 1;076,000 Capital EaOentliturcs: Dasign 25.753 50.247 24.000 100.000 Righf d Way _ COIIS(NCNW1 B7B.00O 'I.00O�OOO H%B.00O. Total F�cpendltures 25.753 50,247 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,076,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2019 2020 2UtS2020 FunOing Sources Unrestncled Weter Revenue Giants(Fed,State,Locel) Bond Proceads 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 6,500,000 Other Toml Funding Sources: 7,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 8,500,000 Capital ExpentllWres DeshJ� 24.000 Poght d Wey ConSlNLtlon 1,500,000 1,SOO,000 7,WO,O00 B,476,000 Tofal ExpenCitures 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 8,SD0,000 Grants/Other Sou'ces� 115 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capifal Facilkfes Plan Six Year Capital F.abilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Utilities Field Operations Center Project No: epXX)C�)C Project 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Coretruct building for utilities field st2ff use and storage of field equipmerrt. Progress S.ummary• Fuhrre ImpaM on Operating Budget No significarrt impact Activity 2014 YE 2015 Vear,Entl FunEing Sources PNor to 2014 Estlmats 2075 Bu et Y018 Budgst P set Total Unrestnctetl Wefer Reyanue 100,000 '100,000 GiaMs(Fed,State,LOCe/) Otheropereting transferM SeMer 100.000 100,000 Ofher oparatiig erensler in Simn t0�OW 700 000 Total Funding Sourus: 300,000 300.000 Capipl ExpenCiNros Design RlgM d Way Construction 300,000 300,000 Tofal F�cpendiWres 300,000- � 300,000" Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2077 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Saurps Unrestncted Weter Rawnue 100,000 Granfs(Fed,State,Loce!) - Other operatlrg trensfe�M Seuer 100.000 Other operatisig trarisfer m Stam �00 000 Total Funding Sourcas: 300,000 Gpinl ExpendiWres Deslgn PogM d Wey - ConSWCNon 300.000 Total Expendifurea 300,OOf Grarrts/Other Sources: 116 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capkal Facflities Plan Sfx Year Capkal Faoilkles Plan,20'IS2020 Enterprise Funds arojectree: Valley AC Main Replacement ProjactNo: CP1219 Projearype: Non-Capaeity ProJectManager Truong Desoriptiori: Distribution system repair ard replacemerrt project requirered for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Projects will replace AC Main in the Valley service area. Progress Summary• Designwill be complete antl projectwill bid in 2014 witli construction completed in 20'I5. Future Impaet on Operating Budget: No sigrrificarrt impact Aetiv'rty 201d YE 2015 Vear End Funding Sourcas P.rlor to 2014 Estlmate 2075 BUOget 2078 Budgat ProJect Total Unrestdcted Weter Rerenue -' Grents(Fed,Stata,Loceq PWTFL _ Bond ProceeOs 74 254 7 345.746 50 000 1.470.000 Total Funding Sources 74,2% 7,345,746 50,000 1,470,000 Capifal Ezpendltures: Design 74.254 60.000 134,234 R/yht d Way _ COn51NCl/011 1.2$$,%AB SO.00O 1�33S.7AG Total Expenditurex 74,254 1,345,748 W,000 1,470,000 Foreeasted Project Cost: rofal 2017 2076 2018 2020 20152020 Funtli�g Soureos: Unrestncted Wefer Revenue G2nts(Fed,State,LxaQ PWTFL BaM Proceeds Sp Qpp Tonl Funtling Sourcex 50,000 Capital Expantlituren: Design _ Right d Way ConstmCllOn SO,O00 Tofal Expenditures: 5D,000 Granls/Other Sources' Bontl proceeds from 2013 bond issuanca. 117 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilBies Plan Six Year Capipt_Facilltles Plan,,2015-2020_ Enterprise Funds Project TiUe: BNSF Utility Crossing - - - - - Project No: cp1308 aroject Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Sweeting Description: Water main inprovemerRs required prior to BNSF rail e�ansion project. Progre§s$urtmmary: The design phase will be completed in 2014 and construction to be completed in 2015. Future Impact on Opereting Budget: No significarrt impact Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Vear End FunCing Sourceu PAor ro 2014 _Eadmate. 2015 BudgeL_ _2016 Butlget _ProjectSofal Unrestncted Weter Revenue G�ants(Fed,Stefe,Locep PWTFL - Bond Piviceei/s 51.358 6]8,644 50,000 �80,000 Tofal Funding Sourtts: 51,358 678,664 50,000 780.000 CaPital Ecpenditules: Des(gn 51.356 40,000 9�.356 R/ght d WaY ' Con5f2Ct7on 838,644 50.000_ _ _ 688,644 Total Expendlfuros: 57,358 878,&14 50,000 780,000 ForegasteC ProJect Cost: � � Total 2017 2078 2018 2020 20752020 Funtling Sources UnresMctetl Weter Re�enue - G/ents(FeN,State,Locel) - PWTFL - Bond ProceeQt 50,000 TofSl FunAing Source� 50,000 Capital E:penGituroa Design RlgM d Way - Construtt/on 50,000 Total ExpenCiturea 50.OW Grants/Othar Sources: eontl proceetls hom 2013 bond issuance. 11g City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) CapiWl Facflities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Ttle: SCADA Upgrades Project No: c524a0 Project 7ype: Non-Capacity (Improvements) Project Manager SWeeting Description: Upgrade the epsting Supervisory Control ard Data Acquisition(SCADA)system, also known as the Telemetry system,to replace obsolete componerrts and allow for improved contrrol of the water utility facilities. Progress Summary: Telemetry upgrades are complete. Physical site improvemeMs are in progress and will be completed in 2015. Fd�re Impaet on Operating Budget: No significantimpact. Acfivity. 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl FunAing Sources: Prior l0 2014 6tlmato 2075 BUA et 2076 BudBet Pro act Total UnrestnctedWaterRevenue 1,06g,277 553,790 10.000 7,633,067 GreMs(Fed,StBte,Local) � BwWPmceeds 1,744.778 1.744,778 Other Total Funding Sourcen: 2,814,055 553,790 70,000 = 3,377,845 Capital E:penAiWres Design 193.77� 793.711 Right d Way Constiuction 2.620.34A 553.790 10,000 3.184.134 TOtal Ezpenditures: 2,810.055 553,790 10,000 3.377,845 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 201&YOYO Funtling Sourcea - UrnesMcfed Weter Revenue �p� Grdnts(Fed,Stffie,Locaq Bwrd Procaeds Other Tofal FunEing Sourcea: �p.ppp CaPltal Eicpenditures: Design Right d Way _ Construction 10,000 Total ExpenCiturea: ' 10,000 GraMS/Other Sources: Bond proceads fiom 2010 bond issuance �� 119 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital FacilRies Plan Siic Year Capltal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project rUe: West Hill Springs Improvements Project No: wabd04 Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Fstall flow control vaM1re for automatic shutdown and upgrade disirrfection system. TNs projec[ was ider�fied diai_ng the DepaRmerrt of Heatth Sanitary Swey as a health and safety concem. Progress Summary• Design will be complete and project will bid in 2014 with construction completed in 2015. Fuhire Impaet on Operating Budget: No significant impact Activky. 2016 YE 2075 Year EnA Funticng Sources Prior b 2014 Estimate 2075 Budget 2016 Butl t Pro ect Total UnresMcfedWaferRevenue 150,OOD - � � - 150,000� Granfs(Fed,Stete,Loca/) - PWTFL - Borrtl PioceeOs 455 000 455.000 Tatal Funtling Sources: 150,000 455,000 603.000 Cap{fal ExpenAfWrea De57gn 150,000 750,000 PogM d Way CiOIIS(NLIIOII 4JS.�0 4JS.�� Total ExpenAltures tso,000 � ass.000 eoa.000 Forecasted Project Cost: � � � roa� 2017 2078 2019 2020 201i2020 Fundfng Saurces: Unrestnctetl YYater Resxnue - Granfs lFed.Stete.laceq PWTFL BorM Proceeds 455 000 Total Funding Sourcex 4`�+.0� Ceplql Expendltursa Design - RigM d Wey r.0I15�2CtIW1 455�000 Tofal ErzpendlNroa �455:000- Grants/Othar Souroes. I2� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capipl FacilRies Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprlse Funds Project Tiue: Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation Projea No: cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Install seismic control valves on outlet piping of Reservoirs 1, 2, 4q 4B, Bq and 88. Progress Suriimary: FuWre impact on Operating Budget: No significarrt impact Activity: 2074 YE 2p75 Year Entl Fundfng Sourcea Prior ro 2074 Estlmate 20�5 BuABet 2078 Butlget Project Tofal UnresMctetl Weter Revenue Caanfs Lnsecuretl Federal PWTFL Bond Proceetls Total Funtlinp Sourees: _ Gapitll�pendlWres: Des/gn PogM d Way Constrvction Tofal ExpendlWras: _ Forecasted Projed Cost: - Tolal 2017 2018 20t9 2020 20152020 Funtling Sourcex UnrestncledWeterRevenue t00,000 100,000 100.000 100,000 400,000 G'enfs-Unsecuiad Federal _ PWTFL Bond Proceetls Tofal Fundine Sources: 100,000 100,000 700,000 700,000 400,000 Capital ExpenCiluras: Dasign RlgM d Wey ConSf2GNon 700.000 �00 O00 t00,000 100,000 400,000 Total Expe�Aitures: 100,000 700,000 100,000 700,000 400,000 G2nts/Other Sou�ces: 121 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan Wi4TEF2 FUND (430) Capltal Facili[les Plan Su Year Capital_Facilfties Plan,.20152020_ Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill - 132nd Ave Distribution System Modifieations Projea No: cpxxxx Projea Type: Non-Capacity Projecl Manager TBD Description: Project witl aCd pressure reducing valve,control valves at Lea Hill resenroirs,arW system valves to provide efficient operation of ttie 132nd Ave Tacoma Intertie. Progress Summary: Design and construction will be completed in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Activity - - 2074 YE 2075 Yaar End Funding Sources: Prlor W 2074 Esflmate 2075 Bud et 2078 Bud t Pr 'ect Total UnresMcfetl Water Ra�anue � - � - Giams(Fed,Stete,Locaf) PWTFL BorM Pmceeds 400,000 400.000 Total Funding Sourcas: 400,000 600,000 Capital Eipentllfurea Design 40,000 40,000 Idght d lNey - - Consfrucfion 360,000 _360,000_ rorai�penaimres: eoo,000 aoo.000 Forecasted Project Cost: � � total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sourcec UnresMcfed Waror Revenue - Giants(Fed,Sfete.Local) - PWTFL eond P�oceeds 400,000 Tofal Funding Sources: 400.000 Capifal Expe�dlWres Design 40,000 RigM d Wey - ConslNGlion 360,000 Total 6cpenAlWres: 400,00r GrantS/Other Sou'ces: 122 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilitfes Plan Six Year Capltal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South Flooding Improvements Phase 2 - 17th Street SE Project No: cp1202 arojea Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Project will replace water main along 77th Avenue SE in conjunction with flood improvements project Progress Summary: Design wlll be completed in 2014 with construction completed in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No signficant impact Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Vear EnA FunCing Souros: Prbr ro_2074 E9lmate 2015 BuOget 2016 Butlget Pro ect Total UnrestActad Weter Revenue 50,000 181,000 23'I,000 Grants(FealStffie,Local) PWTFL Bond Proceeds 669 000 689,000 Total FunAing Sources: 50,000 850,000 900,000 Gplbl EzpanOiWres: Desfgn 50,000 50,000 RigM ol Wey COnSINCHOn H$O.00O BSO.00O Tofal Expenditures: 50,000 850,000 900,000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: - To71 2017 2078 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sourcec Unrestncfed Weter Revanue �g� ppp Grents(Fetl,5lete,LocaQ _ PWTFL _ Bartl Proceeds 669.000 Tofal FunCing Sources: 850,000 Capipl E:penAlWres: Dasi9n R1gM o/ Way Constnicfion 850.000 7obl Expenditures: BW,000 Grents/Other Sources: 123 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUIVU (430) Capilal Facili[fes Plan Si�c Year Capital FacflRies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise_Funds_ Project Title: Auburn Way South - Dogwood to Fir Project No: cp 1118 Project Type: Non-Capaeity Project Manager. SWeEting Description: Water main improvemeMs constructed in conjunction wiN Aubum Way South Cortidor ImprovemeMs. Progress Summary: Design wiQ be completed in 2014 wiM constructlon complated in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No sign�caM impact Activky. zo�a ve za+e rear E�d Funtling Sourcas Prior to 2014 ESUmate 2075 Bud et 2076 BuE et ProjeQ Tolal UnresMctedWaterRewenue 5,144 20,000 34,895 60,039 Grants(Fetl,Stete,LocaQ PWTFL Bontl Pioceetls 7oTal Fundine Sourcae 5,746 20.000 36.�5 80.039 Gpibl F�cDenElturee: Oesign S,t44 10,000 �5,144 RiyM d Way - Consfructlon 10,000 34.895 44.895 Tofal Expendltures S,1M 20,000 34,895 80.039 Foreeasted-Projeef Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 2075�2020 Puntling Sources: --�---�-�- -- � — - UnresMcted Wa[er Re�nue 34,895 Grents(Fred;State,LocaQ PWTFL - Bond Proceeds Tofal Funding Sourcea: 34.895 Capital ExpendiWres: Design Right d Way - Construction . .34.895 Total ExpentllNres 34•e9` Grarrts/O[her Souices: 124 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan W.4TER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20t5-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South - Fir to Hemlock Project rlo: cp 1119 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Sweeting Description: Water main improvemeMs constructed in conjunction with Aubum Way South Corridor ImprovemeMs. Progress Summary• Design will be completed in 2014 with consWction completed in 2015. Future Impac[ on Opereting Budget: No significant impact Activky. 2016 YE 2015 Yaar End Funtline Sou�cea: Prlor to 2016_ Estlmate 2015 BUCget 2078 BUAgat Project Tobl UnrestncfedWeterRevenue 3.907 5,000 30,000 38,907 Grants(Fed,State,Local) _ PWTFL _ Bond Pioceetls Tofal Funding Sources: 3,9W 5,000 30,OD0 3g,gp7 Capfbl ExpendiWres Design 3,907 5,000 8,907 RigM ol Way Cwistn2tion 30,000 30.000 Total E:pandiNrer. 3,907 S,ODO 30,000 38,9W Forecasted Projed Cost: Tofal 2017 2078 2019 2020_ _ 20152020 FunCing Sources Unrestrlc(ed Weter Re�snue 30,000 Granfs(Fed,Stata,Locel) PWTFL _ Bond Proceeds Tofal Funtling Sources: 30.000 Gpital ExpendlWres Design RigM d Way _ Construchon 30,000 Tofal F�cpenAlWres: 30,000 Grarrts/O[har Sources: 125 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430� Capital Facilkies Plan Shc Year Capital Faeilkie"s Plan, 20152020 Enterprlse_Funds. Project Tiue: Auburn Way South - Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood Project No: cp1218 Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Sweeting Descriptlon: Water maln improvemeMs constructed in conjunction with Auburn Way SaM CoRidor Improvemerrts. Progress Summary• Design will be completed in 2014 with consWctlon completetl in 2075. FutWre Impact on Operating Budget: No significarrt impact Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Year EnE Funding Sourcem Prlor b 2014 Estlrtiate 1015 Budget 2078 BUEget Pro ect Topl UniestrictetlWeterRewnua 5.0�0 55,000 60,000 GraMs(Fed,Stefe,locaq - PWTFL - Bond Pioceeds Total FunAing Sourees: 5,000" "55,000 -- � 80,000 CaplLl Expantlitures Des/gn 5,000 5,000 Righf d Wey Construction 55,000 55,000 Total Expenditures: 5,000 55,000 80.000 Forewsted Proje¢t Cost: Tofal 2017 2078 2018 2020 201&2020 Funding Souras: Unresfncted VVefer Revenue 55,000 Grerrts(Ferl,State.Local) ' PWTFL - Bwtl Pioceeds Total Funding Sources = � -55.000 CaPltal ExpsnAitures: Deslgn R7gM ol Wey - Construct/on 55,000 rwai�oe�amres: _ ss,oa GraMs/Other Souices: 126 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan WATER FUND (430) Cepipl Facilities Plan Six Year Capitai Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Painting Project No: CpXXxx Project 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Managar• TBD Descriptlon: A�intenance of reservoirs requires periodic painting to protect Ne steel and increase the useful Ilfe of the reservoir Progress Summary• Planned FuWre Impact on Operating Budget: No significarrt impact Activity. zo�a rE zo�s rear ena Funtling Sourcen: Prfor b 2016 Estimafe 2075 BUABat 2016 ButlBet Project Total_ Uniestncfetl Wafer Reuenue Grants(Fed,Stafe,Loca/) _ PWTFL BaW Proceeds Tofal Funding Saurces: CaPibl E:pandiWrea: Design _ Rlghf W Wey _ ConSWction Total EspenAiWrec _ Forecasted Project Cost: - rom� 2017 2018. 2019 2U20 2075-2020 FunAing Sources Unrestncted Waler Rewnue 1,250,000 1,250.000 Grants(Fetl,Stffie,Loca/) PWTFL BwM Proceeds ToTal Funtling Sources: 1,250,000 1,250,000 Capifal Fspenditures: Desi9� t50�000 150�000 �. R/ghf 0/ Way _ ' ConSWction t.700.000 1.100.000 Tofal F�cPanOiOirec 7.250.000 7,250.000 Grants/Other Sources' 127 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Pla�z WATER FUND (430) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital FacilBies Plan, 2015-2b20 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 24" White River Crossing Project No: epxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Desbription: The facilities evaluation study conducted in 20'132014 found a suspectetl leak on the 24" steel trensmission main crossing the White River The approbmate location was tleterminetl, Dul further investigation is required to assess lhe degree arM magnRude of the leak Thls proJeetwill providefor full replacementol the river crossing. Progress Summary• D.esign Is anticipated to be completed in 2016 with coretructlon completed in 2017 Future�Impect on�Opereting Budget: No significantimpact Activity: za�a re zo�e rear�a Funtling Sources: Prior ro 2014 Estlmafe 2015 Budget 2078 BuCget Projeet Total Unrasmcletl WeterRevenue - Giants(Fed,State,Local) PWTFL - BwM Proceeds 450 000 Tofal Funtling Sources 450,000 - Cepital ErzPenditures pgsign 100,000 - PogM d Way - Construction 350.000 Total EiPantllWres �0�-. ..._ Forecasted Project Cost: Totel 2017 2018 2018 2020 201SZ020 Funding Sources UnresfnctedWaterRe�snue 450,000 450,000 GraMs(Ferl,State,Loca!) - PWTFL BwM Pioceeds 450 000 Tofal Funding Sources 450,000 900,000 Capipl FxpandiMes: Deslgn 100.000 PogM b Wey cu,�srn,cnon aso,000 aoo,000 Torai �cPenaiwres: aso,000 eoo.000 crerns�aner sou�cas: 128 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE W-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets WATER Pro ect: 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total � 1 Wellllmprovements $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 1,800 $ 10,600 2 Fulmer Well Fleltl Improvamen[s 3 CassadeWaterAlllanceWatu Purohase ' ' ' ' d AcademyPump Sta[ion#1 Replacement - - - 5 Coal Creek Springs Rahabllltatlon 6 Green Rlver Pump Statlon _ _ 600 600 600 1,800 Emergeney Power 7 WeIIIPowerandChlorinatlon 600 600 600 600 600 600 3,600 8 Wa�lln�oecNonand Redaval opment Progra m - 9 Water Repalr 6 Replacemeni _ _ _ _ _ 10 LekalandNlllaReservolr5 /mprovemanfs � - 11 Comprehensl ve Water Plan _ _ _ _ 12 MITMasferMeters _ _ _ _ _ 13 Street Utilitylmprovements - ' ' ' ' ' 14 Lea Hlll PRV ffiation Improvements - 75 �M1'aterMeter68111ingSystem /mprorements - - - ' 16 UttlttlesFleldOperatlons Center - ' - - - - 17 Va11eyACMainReplacemenl _ _ _ 78 BNSFUtiIlryCromnq _ _ _ _ _ 79 SCADA Upgrades _ _ _ _ _ 20 We4 H!lI Springs Improvement _ _ _ _ _ . _ 27 ReservatrSelrnic Reheb(Iltatlon - - ' 22 Lea Nlll-132nd Ave Dtstrlbuffon SyaYem - - - - _ Modl/Icatlons 23 AuburnWaySoFlooding Improvements Phase 2 - - - - ' 2d Auburn Way South-Dogwood to Ftr - ' ' ' 25 Aubum Way Souffi-Ftr to Hemlock - - ' ' 26 Auburn Way South- Muek/ed,00t Plaza ta _ _ _ _ Dogxrootl 27 ReservolrPalnting _ _ _ _ _ _ 28 21"Wh(te River Crosing ' ' ' ' - ' Total S 2A00 S 2Aoo S 2,40o S 3,OOo S 3,000 f 3,000 E 16,200 129 I City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 130 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SANITARY SEWER Current Facilities The Citys sanitary sewer service area encompasses approximately 28-square miles which are primarily within the City limits, but includes a totai of approximately '/� square mile within Aubum's Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage treatment and disposal. The City's Sanitary Sewer Utility is responsible for the collection and transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines. The Citys current inventory of approximately 197 miles of sewer lines serves the City's sewer service area. Tabie S-1, Facilities Inventory, lists the sewage collection and transmission facilities along with their capacities and locations. Level of Service (LOS) The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan for the Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level of service (LOS}, or design criteria, for the Citys sewage collection system. These standards represent the average quantities of sewage that the system is designated to accommodate for residential, industrial, and commercial development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Investments in the Citys sewage collection facilities include primarily non-capacity improvements and replacement projects. Anticipated replacements include replacement of aging sewer pipes and manholes in conjunction with arterial and local street improvements, and replaCement of pipe identified through the sewer program's condition assessment process. Anticipated improvements include upgrades and additions to the utility's maintenance facilities and the construction of a sewer decant facility The City of Auburn's sewer system anticipates costs for seven non-capacity projects tofaling $11,345,160. Table S-2 shows the proposed fnancing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Opereting Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the six years 2026—2021 131 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE S-1 Facilities Inventory Sewage Facilities CAPACITY - FACILITY (MGD) LOCATION um Stations: ith Street 0.26 900 8th Street NE 2nd Street 0.79 1950 22nd Street NE rea i9 0.47 800 71st Street SE ubum 40 0.63 4159 O Place NE ogwood 0.43 1423 Dogwood Street SE llingson 2.20 100 41st Street SE Street 0.86 1700 F Street SE orth Tapps 0.73 2610 Lake Tapps Pkwy SE easley Ridge 0.36 5225 South 320th Street Street 0.14 600 R Street NE ainier Ridge 0.29 31809 125th Place SE 'verside 0.58 13900 104th A�enue SE Terrace View 0.94 104 60th Street SE Valley Meado� 0.18 2022 4th Street SE Verdana 2.88 11807 SE 296th Place (Kent, WA) FACILITY Pi e Size_ LOCATION River Crossinas: Inverted Syphon 8 & 12 Inch Green Ri�er& 26th Street NE 8th Street Bridge 14 Inch Green Ri�er 8� 8th Street NE 132 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE S-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING SANITARY SEWER DIVISION 2015 2076 2017 2018 2018 2020 Total Caoacitv Proleets: NOf1e Non-Canaekv Prolects: 7 SanitarySewer Repatr 6 RepWceme�rt Cepital CoSLs 1,930,000 2,050,000 300,000 7,500,000 300,000 '1,500,000 7,580,000 Funding Sources. SewerFuntl 1,930,000 2,050,000 300,000 '1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 758�.000 BonC Proceetls 2 Stree!Utilky ImprowmerKs Cepital Cosis 200.000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 7,200,000 Funtling Sources: Sewer Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200.000 1,200,000 Bond Proceetls 3 Vactor Decarrt Faciifty Capital CosS 30,000 240,000 - - - - 270,000 Funtling Sources: SewerFuntl 30,000 240.000 - - - 270,000 Bond Proceetls 4 Comprehensiva Sewer Plan Update Capiml Costs 25,000 - - - 350,000 375,000 Funding Sources. Sewer Funtl 25,000 - - - - 350,000 375,000 Bontl Proceetls 5 Auburn Way South Roodirp hnprowmerK-Phase 2 CapitalCosts 4�5,160 - - - - 415,160 Funtling Sources: SewerFuntl 415,t60 - - - - 615,160 Bond Proceeds 6 BNSF UtilHy Crossinps Capital Cos� 5,000 - - - - - SA00 Funding Sources: Sewer Funtl 5,000 - - - - 5,000 .Bond Proceetls 7 Sewer P�anp Station ReplacemeM/ImprovemeM Capital Costs - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,D00 Funtling Sources: SewerFuntl - - - - - 1,500,000 7,500,000 Bond Proceeds SuMotal.NdtCaoacMv Probeta: Capifal CosS 2,605,t60 2A80,000 500,000 7,700,000 500,000 3,550,000 71,345,160 SUMMARV: G1PfTAL COSTS CapaciryProjects - - - _ _ _ _ Non-CapaciryPro�ecfs 2,605,160 2,490.000 500,000 1,700,000 500,000 3,550,000 1'1,345,160 Total Costs 2,605,760 2,690,000 500,000 1,700,000 500,000 3,550,000 17,345,160 FUNDING SOURCE3: UtlliryFuntls (Seuer) 2,605,160 2,490,000 500.000 1,700,000 500,000 3,550,000 11,345,760 Bond Proceeds - - _ _ _ Other Total Funtlin9 2,605,160 2p90,000 500,000 1;700,000 SOOA00 3,SSOA00 11,345,760 133 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWERFUND (431) CapkalFacilitiesPlan Suc.YearCapltalFaeilkles_PIan,207S2020_ _ EnterpriseFunds Project Tine: Sanitary Sewer Repair 8 ReplacemenUSystem Improvements Project No: Cpxxxx ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) ProjectManager Eiwell Descrlptbn: Repair and replace broken sewer mairs and other facilities. These lines will be idartified through teleNsion inspection and rouGna clearvng. This particular program indudes proposed projects which do rot ha�e an approved Project Managemerrt Plan,or are rot associatad with the SOS or other transportation improeemerAs. Ariticipated projecis include bi-armual, stand-abne, repair and replacemerrt projects for sewer lines wldch are broken,misaligned,"bellied"or oHierwise req�re an inordlnate amourrt of maiMenance eftort or present a risk of backup or trench failu2,and facflities wMch gene2te ConsisteM odor complair�. Additionally,system impro�emeMs wFdch erdiance the abilityto mair�tain service are included Fie2. Progress�Surrmmary• Arrtcipated projecLs for 20152020 inclu0e: 1. MaNiole frame and co�er repfacemeNs. 2. Biennlal Repair and Replacemerrt Projects. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Ttus shoWd decrease the operating budget by correcting ttie problems Uiat require operaUon stafPs attention. Activily: (PreMous 2 Vrs) 2074 YE 2015 Vear End Funtljng 9ources: Pdor fu 2014 FstlmatB _2015 Butlget. .2018 Budget __ .Projoct Totil UnresMctedSexerRevenua 1,285,681- 420,502 - 1;930,000 2,050,000 3,636,183 GiarRs(Fed,Stefe,LocaQ eond Proceeds - Othe� Total Funding Sourcec 1.285.681 420.502 1.930.000� - 2.050.000 3.836,783 Capital Ezpendltures: Desgn 192,852 100,000 290,000 307,500 582.852 RigM d Way - Cons7rucMrn 'I.092,629 320.502 1.640.000 1.742.500 3.053,331 Total Expsntliturex 7.2B5,6B7 420,502 7.830,000 2,050,000 3,636,183 Foredasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 FwMing Sources UnrestrlctedSe�aerRe�nue 300.000 1.500.000 300.000 1.500,000 7.580.000 Grants(Fed,State,Loca/) Bartl Proceeds Otlffx Tofal Funtling Sources 300,000 1.500,000 300,000 1,500,000 7.560.000 Gpital ExpendiWrea: Desi� 200.000 150.000 200,000 150.000 1,297.500 RigM d Way Consfruction 100,000 1,350,000 100,000 1,350,000 8.282.500 Total Ei�{ientlitures: 300.000 7,500,000 300.000 1.500.000 7,580,ON Grants/Other Sourcas: 134 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWER FUND (431) CapRalFacilkiesPlan Six Year Capital Faeilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds ProjectTiUe: StTeet Utility Imp�Ovements Project No: cpxxxx ProjectType: Non Capacity ProjectManager TBD Description: Sewer line replacemeM in coordination with the Save our Streets(SOS) program and Arterial improvemerrts. Progress Summary: - Ongoing Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significaM Impact Activity. (Prallous 2 Vrs) 2oia ve zots vear ena FunAing Sourcac PAcr to 2014. .Estimate. 2075 Butl et 20�8 Budget Pro act Tofal UnresMctedSererRevenue 34g,pp0 200,000 200,000- 200,000 998,000 G2nts(Fad,Slete,LocaQ _ Bard Proceeds _ aner Total Fundin8 Sourcex 348.000 200,000 200,000 200,000 848,000 CaPlfal F�cpen0iturea Design 34.800 20.000 20.000 20.000 94,800 RigM ol Wey ConstruCtion 373,200 'I80,000 t80,000 780,000 673,200 Total Erzpanditures: 348,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 7A8,000 �Foreoasted Project Cost: Total 20t7 2018 2019 20T0_ _2075-2020 FunCing Sources: - -- UnrastnctedSe�aerRevenue 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Grarrts(Fetl,Stete,Local) Bmd Proceeds Other Total Funtling Sources: 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,2D0,000 Gpifal ExpenAitures: Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 RigM o/ Wey Conswcfion t80,00p 180,000 180,000 180,000 _ 1,080,000 Total F�cpendlWres: 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 7,200.000 Grants/Other Sources 135 City ofAubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWER FUND (437) CapkalFacllklesPlan Six Year Capital Facllkfes Plan, 2075-2020 Enterprlse Funds ProjectTiue: Sewer Vactor Decant Facility Prbject No: cpxxxx ProjectType: Non-Capacity (Improvements) ProjectManager TBD Deso�iption: " FiaWs allocated to construct a decarR facility for sewer vactor waste. Progress Summary• Staff concluded that the ise of an expanded decarrt building at the M&O facility to decarrt sewage oras impractical,so attems6ve sites will be e�lored. Future Impad on Operating Budget: i}is pmject wo�ld decrease the fuhre operating budget by reducing the e�enses associated with hauling sahuated waste to tha Gourriy landfill. Activily. 2074 VE 2014 Vear EnC Funding Sources: Prior to 2074 6tlmate 2015 Butlget 2078 BUAgat Pro ect Total UnrestActedSeHerRevanue 30,000 240,000 30,000 GraMs(FeQStete,local) BwM Proceeds Other Total FunAfng Sourcea: 30.000 240,000 30,000 Capibl EupendlNrea Design 15.000 30,000 15,000 PogM d Wey/PropertyAcquisR/on �5,000 15,000 Conxtluttion 2t0.000 7ota1 Eicpendldires 30,000 240.000 �0,000 Forecasted Project Cost: roni 2077 2018 2078 2020 2015-2020 Funtling Sourcex UnresMcted Seuer Rerenue 270,000 GraMs(Ferl,5lete,Local) Bond Pioceeds Other Tofal Funding Sources - Z70,000 Capital F�penditures Design 45.000 Right W Way/PmpeRy Acquisition 15,000 ConsfNGtlon 21 O 000 Tohl ExpendlWrax - 270,000 Grants/Other Somces — 136 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWERFUND (431) CapkalFacllkiesPlan Six Year.Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds ProjectTitle: Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Project No: cpxXXX ProjectType: Non-Capacity (improveme�ts) ProjectManager TBD Descriptlon: Update the Comprehensive Sewer Plan to be consisterrt with ttie Citys overell Comprehensive Plan update as required by the Spte of Washington. Progress Summary: The Citys consultarrt has completed preliminary work, arid is preparirig a draft document for approval eary in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Yaer End Funtling Soureea: PApr to 20'14 Estimate 2015 eudpet 2016 Budgat ProJeet Total Unrestncted SeNer Revenue 325,000 25,000 350,000 GreMS (Fetl,Stefe.LOCef) BwW Proceeds aner Tobl Funding Sources: 325.000 25,000 350,OOU Capifal EzPendlWres Design 325.000 25.000 350.000 IbgM W Way Construction 7otal Ezpendilures: 325,000 25,000 350,000 Foreeasted Project Cost: Tota I 2017 20'18 2078 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources: UnrastncfatlSe�ierRevenue 3W,000 375,000 Grants(Fred,State,Locel) BorM Proceeds Other Tofal Funding Sources: - 350,000 375,000 Gpifal FspenCiWres �s�9^ 350,000 375,000 R/ght o/ Way CO/ISfNLf1011 � Tofal Eupenditures 350,000 375,000 Grdrrts/Other Sources: 137 City ofAubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWER FUND (431) Capital FaoilkiesPlan Six Year Capifal FaciUties Plan, 2015-2020 EnterpAse Funds Project Tiue: Auburn Way South Flooding Improvement - Phase 2 Project No: CP1202 P�oject Type: Non Capaeity Project Manager TBD Desoription: Repl�e the Ciry sewer main and portions of side sewers within fhe rigMof-way in 17th Street SE in conjunction with stortn drahiage and water improvemeMs. Progress Summary: The project is in design and is e�ected to be constructed in the Spring/Summer of 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: � None AcHvity 2074 VE 2075 Year Entl FurMing Sources: Prlor to 20t4 Estimate 2015 BuOget 2018 Budget Project Tapl UnrestnctBdSeNeiReeenue 65,200 415,t80 480,360 Gients(Fed,State,Lacel) Bond Proceeds OLrer 7ofa1 Fundfng Sources 65.200 415,180 480.3fA CaPifal E:Pendlturcs Design 65,200 65,200 RigM ol Wey - Constructirn 415,160 415,160 Tofal F�ipenAlb�res &5.200 475.180 - - --480.380 Forecasted Project Cost: Topl 2017 2078 2019 2020 201S2M0 FunCing 9ources: Uniastricted Seuier Revenue 415,160 G�anfs(Fei/,S7ffie,Local) BwM Pioceetls Other Tofal Funtlin9 Sourcea 415,180 Capital FicpenClWres: Design R7gM d Wey Constluction 415J60 Total ExpanAl[urec 475,160 Grants/Other Sources: 138 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWERFUND (431) Capital FacilkiesPlan Six Year Capital Facilkfes Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Projea rue: BNSF Utility Crossings Project No: CP1308 Project Type: Non Capacky Project Manager SWeeting Descriptlon: Replace one server main which crosses under the BNSF railroaC tracks to ensure that i[complies with pipeline casing requirements prior to the BNSF consWction of a third Vack within their rightof-way. Progress Summary: The project is e�ected to be substantially constructed in 2014 and completed in early 2015. FuWre Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Activity: 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources P.Aor b 2014 E9lmate 2075 Budget 2076 BUAget Project Tofal UnresMCtadSe.ierRevarrue 1q,440 356,500 5,000 375.960 Grents(Fed,Stafe,Loca/) Bond Proceetls _ Other Totll Funtling Sourcas: 14,440 356,500 5,000 - 373,94U Capital Fspen0ltures Des/gn 14,440 15,000 ?g,qqp Right W Wey Constluction 341,500 5,000 348,500 7ofa1 Expenditures: 14,440 356.500 5,000 375,940 Foreoested Project Cost: Tofal T017 2018 2018 2020 2015Q020 FunCing Sourcea UniestNcted SeNer Reven�e 5.000 Grants(Fed,State,Lwaq Bontl Pioceeds Other Tofal Funding Sources: 5,000 Capitll Ezpenditures Design Right d Way Constructirn 5,000 Total 6cpenOlNres: - 5,000 GreMs/Other Sowces' 139 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SEWER FUND (431) Capital FacilitiesPlan Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Pump Station Replacement�lmprovement Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: Capacity S Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement Projebt Manager Descriptiori: � Project(s)to repair, upgrade,and/or replace e�dstirig pwnp stations. Stations aMicipated to need upgrades during ihat time indude: 1. The Valley Meadaws Pump Station. 2. The 22nd Strcet Pump Station. 3. The 81h Street Pump Station. Progress Summary• FuWre Impad on Opereting Budget: The effect on fulure operation budget will be negligible. Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Vear Entl Funding Sourrcex Prior to 2074 Estimale 2075 BUAget 2018 Bud t Pro ect Total Unrestncfed Sewe�Rewnue - Granfs(FBd,Stffie,Lxal) - Bond Proceetls Othe� Tohl Funtling Sources - Capifal ExPenClturoa Des/gn Right d Way Construction Tofal ErzpenAlluros: - Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 207i2020 Funding Sourcea Unrestticted Seuer Revenue 1,500,000 1,500,000 Grenfs(Fea',Stffie,Lxal) BmM PioCeeds - Other 7oq1 Funtling Sources 1,500,000 1,500,000 Capital ExpendiWres: Deslgn 300,000 300,000 Right d Way Corisfruction 1,200,000 1200.000 Total Expendituras: 1,500,000 1,500,00� GraMs/Other Sou�ces: 140 City ofAuburn Draft Capitkl Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE Current Facilities The City's storm drainage service area encompasse"s the municipal boundaries of the City For management purposes the service area is divided into 60 drainage sub-basins. The City's drainage system consists of a combination of closed conveyance pipes and open ditch conveyance facilities, with six pumping stations. Table SD-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacities and location. Level of Service (LOS) The City's Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City's storm drainage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25- year/24hour design storm capacity within the 60 drainage sub-basins. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's storm drainage facilities anticipates four capacity projects in the amount of $1,433,600, 17 non-capacity projects totaling $13,276,442 for a six-year planning expectation fotal of $14,710,042. Table SD-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacfs forecasted for storrn drainage facilities during the six years 2016—202-1 141 City ofAubum Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE SD-1 Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities cnPAciTv Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION Diainage-- - -- easins: A 562 36,300 1,200 See City of Aubum's AA 408 17,600 17,100 ComprehensiveDrainage AAA 296 3,100 5,300 Plan, Dec. 2009 AZ 777 53,400 14,200 B 864 94,400 0 BB 15 1,700 0 BBB 73 0 0 C 836 75,900 5,600 CG 242 1,400 0 CCC 976 56,400 12,900 D 168 18,900 400 DD 231 0 0 DDD 61 4,000 0 E 692 59,400 19,400 EE 600 3,900 0 F S3 9,600 0 FF 411 3,600 900 G 137 18,800 0 GG 190 4,900 3,100 H 559 40,000 4,600 HH 392 0 0 HV 66 5,200 0 I 241 35,300 7 100 II 305 0 0 J 257 5,000 1,100 JJ 1,170 26,600 17,200 K 266 15,100 700 KK 391 0 0 L 87 12,900 600 LL 198 100 1,600 LS 1 138 48,800 0 M 553 32,400 9,900 MM 332 1,900 1,200 N '126 9,800 0 NN 588 11,100 900 NNN 175 400 0 O 176 16,900 3,600 00 1,397 28,500 8,900 P 189 7,800 3,100 PP 110 1,600 0 PPP 161 3,400 4,500 QQ 334 11,400 3,300 142 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE SD-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities cAaAcirr Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION R 55 7,200 0 RR 249 11,600 4,700 S 273 13,700 2,200 SS 333 20,900 2,700 T 699 78,300 1,400 TT 135 3,000 0 U 365 9,800 0 UU 453 14,200 700 V 598 19,700 10,100 W 287 30,300 2,400 WC 65 7,900 0 WW 71 1,100 500 X 40 3,600 0 YY 327 23,200 5,600 YYY 105 0 0 2 70 9,700 0 ZZ 949 47 400 17 400 ZZZ 237 0 0 ToWI 22,144 1,079,100 196,100 FACILITY (GPM) LOCATION Pumn Stations: White Ri�r Pump Station 17,700 5000 block A Street SE A Street SE Pump S[ation 1,380 A Street SE near SR-18 and BNRR oeerpass Aubum Way S Pump Station #3 1,000 Aubum Way S near SR-18 and BNRR o�rpass Brannan Park Pump Station #4 20,200 Brannan Paric Emerald Corp. Park Pump Station 6,500 C Street NE near 42nd Street West Main Street Pump Station 1,200 1420 West Main Street 143 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE SD-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING STORM DRAINAGE DIVISION 2015 2076 2017 2018 20�9 202U Total Cauadb Proietts: 1 Bypass at 2ntl a�G Street SE Capital Cos Ls - - 50,000 493,800 543,600 Funtling Sources Slortn Fund - - 50.000 493,800 543,600 Bond Proceeds 2 M Street SE Stwm Improvement CaO�m� Cosfs a00,000 - 400,000 Funtlmg Sources Slorm Fund 400,000 - - 400,000 Bontl Prooeeds - 3 Howartl RoaA Improvemetrt Capital CosS 40,000 250,000 - 280,000 Funtling Sources Stortn Fund 40,000 250,000 - 290,000 Bond Proceeds 4 S7Sh St NW Storm Improvement Capital Cos ts 40,000 160,000 - - 200,000 Funtling Sources Srortn Funtl 40,000 160,000 - - - 200,OOC BOnd Proceeds 5 M 80 Stam Drainage ImprovemeMs Capital CosS 840,050 - 640,050 Funding Sources Srorm Fund 305,080 - - - - 305,080 Granis 9,897 - 9,887 Olher (Wa[er, Sewer, ERR) 525,083 - 525,083 SuMotal.Caoacitv Ptdects: Capital CosTs 1,320,050 410,000 • • SO,OOD 493,600 2,273,650 Non-Canatttv Proiects: 8 PI{iellne Repa'v &Reptaeeme�rt Program Capital CosS 1,000,000 100,000 1.000,000 100,000 7,000,000 100,000 3,300,000 Funding Sources Slorm Fund 1,000,000 100,000 7,000,000 100,000 1,000,000 700,000 3,300,000 __Bond_Proceeds - - 7 /wburn Way SwN flooding,Phase 2 CaPital Costs 1482,392 - - - - 7,482.392 Funding Sources Stoen Funtl - - - - . Bond Proceeds 1,482,392 - 1,482,392 8 30th Streat NE Mea AooNng,Phase 1 Capital Cosis 10,000 - - - - - 70,000 Funding Sources Slortn Fund 10,000 - - - - 10,U0� Bond Proceeds 144 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE SD-2 2075 2076 2017 2018 2019 202U Total Non-Canackv Proieets: 9 30th Street NE Area Flooding,Phase 2 Capifal CosS - 75,000 600,000 - - - B75,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 75,000 600,000 675,000 Bond Procaeds - 10 30th Street NE Nea Fooding, Phase 3 Capital CosLs - 200,000 954,000 - 1,154,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund - - 200,000 954,000 - 1,154,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - _ 11 West Main Street Pump Station Upg}ade Capifal Costs 125,000 985,000 - 7,770,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund 125,000 985,000 - - - - 7,110,000 Bond Proceeds - - - 12 StreetUtilitylmprovements Capihal CosS 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 60U,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - 13 Compreher�iva Storm Drainage Plan Update Capital Cos6 10,000 - - - - 250,000 260,000 FunCing Sources: Stortn Fund 10,000 250,000 280,000 Bond Proceeds - - - _ 14 Mill Geek Wetland SK Reach Restoration Capital Costs 255,000 5,000 55,000 55.000 5,000 - 375,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund 5,000 5,000 55,000 55,000 5,000 - 1Y5,000 CxanLs 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 General Fund - - - _ 15 Eastrftlge Manor OuNall Replacement Capital Costs 810,000 - - 810,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund 810,000 - - - 870,000 Grants - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 16 BNSF Utilities Crossing Capital CosLs 10,000 - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Srortn Fund 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Grants - _ _ _ Bond Proceeds - - - - _ _ 145 City o.fAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE SD-2 2075 2018 2017 2018 2019 2020 Tctal 17 Compostlng Facilky Capital CosLs 750,0�0 - - - 750,OU0 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 750,000 - - - 750,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - 18 MIIsWe Dreinage AssessmerH Capital Cosk 150,000 750,000 150,000 - - 450,000 Funding Sources: Slorm Fund �50,000 150,000 150,000 - - - 450,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - 19 North Alrport Area Improvements Capifal Costs 40,000 135,000 - - - 175,000 Furiding Souroes: Slortn Fund 40,000 135,000 - - 775,000 Bond Proceeds - - - 20 DStSEStam ImprovemeM Capital Costs - 75,000 600,000 - - 675,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 75,000 600,000 - - 675,000 Bond.P.roceeds - - - 2'I Mnexation Area Small Storm Improvement Capipl CosLs 40,000 260,000 40,000 260,000 - - B00,000 Funding Sources: Stortn Fund 40,000 260,000 40,000 260,000 - - 800,000 Bond Proceads - - - - - - Subtotal.NoirCaoackv Prolects: Capiial Cosfs 4,032,392 1,810,000 2,770,000 1,315,000 2,059,000 450,000 12,436,392 SUMMARI'• CAPRAL COST5 CapacityProjects 1,320,050 410,000 - - 50,000 493,600 2273,650 Non-Capadty ProJects 4,032,392 1.810,000 2,770,000 1,315,000 2,059,000 450,000 12,436,392 Total Costs 5,352,442 2,220,000 2,770,000 1,315,000 2,109,000 943,600� 14,710;042- RINDING SOURCES: Stortn Fund 3,085,080 2220,000 2,770,000 1,315,000 2,109,000 943.600 12,442,680 Grants 259,887 - - - - - 259.887 Otlier 525,083 - - - - - 525,083 Bond Proceeds 1,482,392 - - - - - 1,482,392 Total Funding 5,352,442 2,220,000 2,770,000 1,315,000 2,109,000 943,600 74,710,042 146 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capifal Facilities Plan Six Year Capipl FacilRfes Pian, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Titie: Bypass at 2nd and G Street SE Project No: cpxuux Project Type: CapaCity Project Manager TBD Descrfption: TYtis project will iretall a parallel bypass pipe to cornrey upstream fbws arourid a localized low spot located at 2nd and G SVeet SE. The existing line will serve to drain the localized low spot. Progress Surrimary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significarrt impact. Activity. 2014 YE 2075 Year EnC Funding Sources: Prior ro 2014 Eatimafe 2015 Butlget 2076 Budget Project Tolal UnrestActed Storm Revanue " Giants-Secured(Fed,State.GoceQ Bond ProceeUs Other Total Funding Sourcew _ Gpital EipenOitures: Design Rlghf oI Wey ConstnicHon Tofal ExpanCitures: _ Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2077 2078 2019 2020 2U7&2020 FunAing Sourws: Unrestnctetl Storm Revanue 50,000 493,600 543,600 Grants-Securetl(Fetl,Stzle,Locel) 8ontl Proceed5 Oflrer Total Funding Sources: 50,000 493,800 543,800 Capital ExpanAitures: Design Sp.ppp Sp.ppp R'ght o/ Way Consfructlon 493,600 493,600 Total ExpBndiWres: 50,000 493,600 543,600 ' Grants/Other Sources: 147 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capita� Facilities Plan Six Yea[Capital_Facilihes Plan,_2015r2020 Enterprise Funds Project Tine: M Street SE Storm Improvement Project No: CpXxx Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD Descriptlon: This Project will iristall a replacemeirt pipe of greater capactty from 3rd Street SE to A�in Street to alleviate perbdic flooding in th(s area as a result of upsiream flows. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: None, since this is a rePlacemeM pips. Activity: 2014 YE 2075 Vear End Funding Sources: PNor to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2076 Budgat Pro ae[Total UnresMcted Srorm Revenue 30,000 400,000 430,000 Grants-Secu�ed(Fed,Stffie,tocal) - - BpM Proceeds - Other TMaI FunGing$ources: 30,000 400,000 430,OD0 Capipl EipanWWret Deslgn 30,000 60,000 90,000 RlgM W Way Con57NCf/on 340,000 340,000 Tofal FxpenNWrea 30.000 000,000 430,000 Foreaasted ProJect Cost: TOTaI 2017 2018 2019_ 2020 20152020 FunEing Sourcem ' �� Unrestncfed Stam Reuenue 400,000 Grents-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Locel) Bond Pioceeds Other Total Funding Soureee: 400,000 Capital ExpenCitures: Deslgn 60.000 Poghf W Wey - Construttion 340,000 Total Expenditures - �0.�� Granta/Ottiet Soumes: 148 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Si�c Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprisa Funds Project Tiue: Howard Road Improvement Project No: cpxxx Project Type: Capacity Project Manager TBD Desaription: Improve tlreinage ditch capaciry alorg the nortli side of Howard Road. Improve inlet capacity antl upsize e�tisting conveyirg line which flows rroAh through the Coal Creek Sprirgs Pwnp Stafion property. hisiall overflow Iine wifh adjustable gate to the epsting line flowing westerly in 21st SL SE. Progress Summary• Futu�re Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity. 2074 YE 2075 Year En0 Funtling Soureen PNor ro Y014 Estlmate 2015 Butlget 2018 Budgat Project Total UnresMtted Sfam Revenue 40,000 250,000 40,000 Grenfs-Securetl(Fed,State,Local) Bond Proceeds _ Other Totnl Funtling Sources: 40,000 250,000 40,000 Capilal Expsnditurea: . .�5�9� 60.000 40.000 Right W Wey COIISINCf%O/1 'lSO�OOO Total F�cpendl0irex 40,000 250,000 40,000 Forewsted Project Cost: Total 2077 2018 2019 2020 201&2020 Funding Sources: Unrestncted Sform Re�enue yyp ppp Giants-Securetl(Fea',Sta[e,LocaQ Bond Proceeds _ Other Total Funtlinq Sources 290,000 Capifal Expendilures: Design qp ppp rx�nr a way _ C�.OIISfNCIIOII Zr�.O� rorai �,cpana�ares: zso,000 Grants/Other Sources: 149 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capkal Faciluies Plan Six Year Capital Pacilitles Plan, 201Y2020 Enterprise Funds. Project Title: 37th St. NW Storm improvement Project No: CpXJf7c Project Type: CapOcity Project Mareger TBD Deswiption: This proJect would increase epsting pipes to provide addkional capaciry to alleviate ounent periodie flooding conditions in vicinity of I St NW This would also provide relief to the flooding e�erienced on the Irrterurban.Bike Traii. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Opereting Budget: None Activky: 2014 YE 2075 Vear End FunEing Sources Prlor to 2074 E.stlmale 2015 Butlgat 2076 Butl et Projaet Tofal UnresMcted Storm Revenue 40,000 780,000 40,000 Grents-Secmad(Fed,State,tocal) - Bmd Proceeds Other Tohl FunEing Sourcea 40.000 - t60,000 �0.000 Gpltal ExpenOibiros Design 40,000 40.000 R/ght W WaY ' ConSt2C17on 160,000 Total Ezpentliturea 40.000 160,000 40,000 Forecasteil-P�oject Cost: Tofal zon zo�e za�s Zazo zo�s-zozo- Funding Sourcec UnresMctetl Sfam Re�nue 200,000 Gianfs-Securad(Fed.State.Locaq ' BwW Proceeds - Oti�er Total Funding Sources: 200,000 Capital Fspentlitures: Des/gn 40,000 RigM d Way - CansfNcf%on . 160.000 Total EapentliWres 200.00D Grants/Other Sources: 150 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capiql Facilities Plan Six Year Capiql Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Tt1e: M &O Storm Drainage Improvements Project No: CP1320 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager Seth �CkStrOm Desoription: This project will co�struct storm drainage improvements and a�and the vacror decant facility at the Citys maintenance and operations facility. Progress Summary• The City received a grant from the State Departrr�erK of Ecologytotaling $999,400 in 2013. Preliminary design has been completed ard final design is in progress. Arrticipated bid award in October2014. FuWre Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity: - - --- -- 2o�a ve zot5 vear�d FunAing Sources: Prlor to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget Prqect Tobl Uniestncted S[orm Revenue 164,920 305,080 470,000 Grants-Secu2tl(Fed,State,Loca/) 889,5i3 9,867 999,400 BwW Proceeds Other(Water, SeHer, ERR) 164,917 525,083 690,000 Total Funtling Sources: 7,319,350 840,050 2,159,400 Gpipl Ezpenditures: Design 485,300 485,300 R'ght o/ Way _ Consf2cMon 834,050. 840,050 1,6�4,t00 Total Expenditures: 1,319,350 840,050 2,159;400 Foreeasted�Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funtling Sources UnresMctetl Storm Revenue 305,080 Grants-Secuied(Fed,State,Local) g,gg7 Bond Proceetis _ Other(Water, Seue� ERR) 525,083 Total Funtling Sources: 840,050 Capital Erzpenditures: Design Right o/ Way ConSINCflon 840,050 Total F�cpenditures: - gqp,p5p Grants P Othar Souices: 151 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital FacilF[ies Plan Siz Year_Capifal_Facilities_Pian,_20152020_ Enterprise_Funds_ - — - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - --- ---- -------- -- - Projed Tiue: Pipeline Repair & Replacement Program Project No: c(ixxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Projeot Manager TBD Description: Projects iderrtified as those requiring replacement of epsting irttrastructure. These projects support street repairs and other utilily replacement programs, requiring coordination. Progress Summary• Fulure Impact on Opereting Budget: No significant impact. Activky: (PreHous 2 Vrs.� 2014 YE 20t5 Year Entl Funtling Sources: Prior to 20�4 Estimate 2015 Butlget_ 2018 Butlget___ Project Total_ Unrestr/ctetl Storm Revenue 339,563 200,000 1.000,000 100,000 1,539,563 oisn(s-seculeo�(Fed,Srere,�ocaq - - - Borrtl Pioceeds Other Total Funding Sources: 339,583 200,000 'I,000,000 t00,000 7,539,583 Gpibl Fipentlitures: Des/gn 100,000 - R/ght ol Way - Constructfon 339,563 200,U00 .1,000,000 t,539,563 Tofal Expentliturex 339,583 200,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,538.563 Fo�edasted�P�oject'Costi� -� - � - - �� -- � rotal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources UnresMctetl Stbmn Revenue 1,000,000 100,OD0 1,000,000 100,000 3,300,000 G2nrs-secuied(Fetl,srare,Loca/) Bond Proceeds Other Total Funding Sources 1.000,000 100.000 7.000.000 700,000 3,300,000 Gpital ExpentliWres: Design 100,000 100,000 300,000 Right of Way ConstrucNon 'I,000,000 1,000,000 3,000,000 Total ExpendlWres 1,000,000 100.000 1.000,000 700,000 3.300,000 Grants/Other Sources: 152 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Tine: Auburn Way South Flooding, Phase 2 Project No: cp1202 Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: Construct cbrnreyance improvemerrt to 17th SVeet SE as part of Metro realignmerrt project. Replace ewsting conveyance line from A Street SE to K Sheet SE aM add an additional 7 ac-ft. of storage witNn the ewsting A Street SE detention pond. Progress Suinmary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significantimpact. Activity 2014 YE 2075 Year End Funtling Sourcea: Prlm to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budgat 2076 BUAget Projaet Total Un2sMcted Storm Reyenue ' Grants-SecureO(Ferl,State,Loce/) _ Bond Proceeds 82,O6B 75.000 1,482,392 1,839,460 Other Total FunCing Sourcac: 82,068 75,OD0 1,482,392 �,gg9,q5p Upihl Enpendilures: Daslgn 82,068 75,000 157,068 Right ol Way Canstmchon 1.482.392 t.482.392 Total EzpendiNrea 82,068 75,000 1,482,392 7,839,460 Foreca§ted P�oject Cost: Tonl 2077 2018 2079 2020 201$-2020_. Funding Sourcos UnresMcled Slom�Rewnue Grenfs-Securetl(Fed,State,Locel) Bontl Pioceeds 1,482,392 Otlre� Total Funding Sourcex ��pgy;gy Capipl ExpendiWres: Deslgn _ RigM d Wey Construction 1,482,392 Tofal ExpentliNrea: 1,482.392 GreMs/Other Souices: 153 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capkal Faeilkies Plan Siz Year CapHal Facflitles PW�n,20152020 Enterprise Funds Projectrne: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1 Project tdo: cp1122 Pro�eccTyPe: Non-Capacity Projectnnanager Kim Truong Descr�tion: This projectwoWd irxtall a new stortn drain from ihe NW comer of the airport property(MH N07)to the ezstlng Brannan Park storm pump station.This pipe would replace the e�dsBrg 30-inch dlameter plpe generally located along @ie 30th St. NE aligrvnerrt ard ihe rortherfy bo�dary of Brannan Park by improvirg the corneyanoe system's hydraWic capacity, thareby reducing the potential for stortnwaterflooding into the street. • 3,820 feet of 42-in.-diameter gravity storm drain from ihe NW comer of airport propertyto the existing Brennan Park stortn p�arip station • Removal of floatable capGue baflles upstream of fhe B2rn�an Paric pump sfation(fhese are rot needed to protect the piunps and reduce ihe system's hyd2Wic capacity) Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significaM impact. Activky. zou ve zo�s rear Ena Funding Sourees: Priw ro 2014 6tlmate 2015 Budgat 2016 Budget P.ro eet Total UnresMcted Storm Rerenue 290.702 1,093.653� t0.000-- -- --- ---� � -1.394.355 GraMs-Secuiad(Fed,Stete,LoceQ Bond Proceeds 2,408,347 2,406,347 Other ToTal Funding Sourcea 290.702 3,500,000 70.000 3.800.�02 CaPltal Expen0lturea: Deslgn 290,702 80.000 350,702 RigM ol Way Consbuct/on 3,440,000 10.000 3.450.000 Total Expendituros: 290.702 3.500,000 10,000 3,600.702 Forecasted Project Cost: romi 2on 2ote 2oi8 2020 2otS2020_ FunEingSources: ' - '- ' ' -- - UnresMttetl Storm Revenue 10,000 GrsMs-Secured(Fed,State,Local) Bond Proceeds - Other Tofal FunAing Sourees: - 10,000 Capital F�cpenditures: Design - RigM d Wey - Constructidr 10,000 Total FxpendlWree: 10,000 GraMs/Other Sources� 154 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capi[al FacllRies Plan Six Year CapMal Pacilkies Plan,2075-2020 Enterprise Funds ProjeaTitle: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 2 Project No: GpXXXX Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager T BD DesaNption: Locate a storm drain�ne to capture stormwaterfrom the Mo residentlal developmeMs at tlie west edge of the fortner CRISTA Mirristrfes property.CurreMly, stormwater flows are discharged orrto a depressed area on llie CRISTA Ministries propertywhere ifs irfittration is limited by high groundwater lewls Mat ocaa durirg e�Qended periods of high flows on the Green Rirer This phase would constrtict a new stortn drein within I St. NE soulhward to connect irrto the upgraded 42-inch diameter(Phase 1) storm drain nearthe iMersection at I St. NE and 30tti St NE. The 42-inch diameterlina would have sufficierrt available capacity to corney ihe I SL NE flows.Key componerhs of Phase 2 include: • 1,760feet of 15tinchdiametergravitystortnd2in • Catch basin and inciderrta�grading to collect stortnwater at ihe upsVeam end of system ProgressSummary• Future Impac!on Opereting Budget: No sigrrificarrtimpact Acfivlty. 2014 VE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources Prior to 2014 Estlmate 2075 Butlget 2018 Bud t ProJee[Tofal Unrestnctetl Stam Re�enue 75,000 Grents-Secured(Fed,State.Locaq BaM Pmceeds Other Total Fun0ing Sources 75,000 - Gpipl Expentli[urex Design 75,000 - Right d Way CO/19�NC1/OIl roeai�Pe�ain,�es �s.000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Total 2017 2018. 2019 2020 2D15-2G20 Funtling Sources - Unrestncted Storm Revenue 600,000 675,000 Grents-Secured(Fed,Stafe,Loca/) _ Bontl Proceeds _ Other Total FunAing Sources: 800,000 875,000 Capital ExpendlWres: Desi9� 75,000 R'ght o/ Way _ ConStNGfion 600,000 600,000 Tofal ExpenNtures: 600,000 675,000 Gran[s/Olher Soumes �55 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capkai Facilnies Plan Six Vear Capital Facilkies PWn,20152020 Enterprise Funds Projea Ttle: 30th SVeet NE Area Flooding, Phase 3 Pro�a No: cpxxxx ProJect7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager T BD DescNp;fon: TiYs projectwoWd reduce flooding in C St NE by 2directing wet weather Ngh flows souThward b� fhe 42-Inch diameter (Phase 1) storm drain in 30tli St NE. By re.directing the C St NE drairege irrto ttie Brannan Park system,Uiese flows would rq longer be afiected by Hgh water ievels in Mill Creek.7o awid deepeNrg the Phase 1 gravity lirie (and extensiw retroflLs to the Brannan Park pump s�tlon),this projectwould include a v.et weatl�er p�anp station and Torce main connection to 30(h SL NE. The upgraded 42-inch diame[er pipe In 30th SL NE woWd ha�e suflicieM capacityfor t}iese additional flows.Key componerds of Pfiase 3 include: •Wet weather purtip sti.tion(estirtiated capaciry of 4.5 to 7 cis). • 1,730 feet of 15-inch diameRrforce main • Di�.ersion struchue in C St NE for p�anp station Progress Summary- Future Impact on Operating Budget: No sigrdflcaMimpact. Activky. 2014 YE 2013 Year End Funding Sourcas: Prlor to 2014 EstlmaOe 2015 Budget 2018 Budget Pr eet Total UnresMcfetl Storm ReJenue Grents-Secured(Fed,Stste,Local) - Boritl Pioceeds - Otlrer Total Funtling Sourus - Gplql Ezpenditurcs Design - R(gflt ol W8y C.OPSINCIIOl1 Total Espentlitures - Forecasted-Prujed Cost: � roea� 2017 2018 2019 .2020- 20158020 Fundfng Sourcex --" ' - " ' UnrasMcred Storm Re�nue 200,000 9;vi,000 1,154,000 Grants-Secured(Fed,Stffie,Loca/) Bond Proceeds Other Total Funtling Sources: 200,000 954,000 1,154,000 Capital Ezpantlitures Design 200,000 200,000 R'ght d Way - ConstNGtion 954,000 954,000 Tofal Expend(tures 200,OD0 956;000 - 7,154,000 Grants/Other Sou�ces: 156 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capifai Facilities Plan Sirz Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Ttle: West Main Street Pump $tation Upgrade Project No: cpxx�c Projea Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager• TBD Descriptan: 1Tvs project will update the epsting pump station by providing a redundant pump and telemetry system meeting level of seroice goals. Progress Summary: Fuhrre Impact on Operating Budget: - - No significarrtimpact. Activity: zou re m�s rear�ia Funding Sources: Prlor ro 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2018 BUCgat Pro act Total Uniesfnctetl Storm Revenua 125,000 985,000 �125,000 Grants-Securetl(Fed,State,Locel) _ Bond Proceetls Ofher Total Funtling Sourees: 125,000 985,000 125,000 Gpital ExpendlNres: Des/gn 125,000 125,000 Right W Way Constrvction gg5.ppp Total EzpendiNres 125,000 985,000 125,000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Toal 2077 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources: Uniesfnctetl Storm Revenue 1,710,000 c.a�rs-sec��ea(Fed,srara,i.ocaq Borrd Proceeds Other Total Funding Sources 1,770,000 Capital ExPenAiWrea Design 125,000 w�nr a way COI15f2GI%0I) 9�r�� 7om1 Expenditures: 1,170,000 I Grarrts/Other Sources: 157 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capftal Facillties Plan Six Year Capital Faclikles Flan, 2015-2020 EntPrprise Funds Pmject Tine: Street Utiiity Improvements Project No: CpxncX Project Type: Non Capaeity Project Manager• TBD Description: Stortn drainage corneyance improvemer�is in coordination with Arterial and SOS improvemerrts. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No.significant Impact. Activity: PreNous 2 yeers 2014 YE 2014 Y88r EnG Funtling Sources: Prlor to 20t4 Eetlmate 2015 Butlget ]O18 Bud et Pro ect Total UnresMcted Stwm Re�+enue 233,367 100,000 '100,000 333,367 Grarrts-Securetl(Fed,Stffie,Lxel) BaM Proceeds - Othar Tofal Funding Soufces 233.367 100,000 �100,000 333,387 GPital Expenditure8: Deslgn 15.296 75.296 RigM d Way Construcfion 2t8.07t 700.000 t00.000 318,071 Total FxpenEiturec 2.73.367 100,000 7D0,000 333,3W Fo7ecasted Project Cost: Total zo�� zo�e zo�s zo"so za�szozo Funding Sourpa � UnresMcled Sfam Re�snue 100,000 10D,000 100.000 700,000 600,000 cranrs-secu�ed(r-ed,srare,toceq - - BaM Proceeds - Other Total Funding Sourcos: 700.000 700,000" "" 100,000 100,000 600,000 CaPltal EzpenCiSuras Des/gn RigM d Way - ConSlruGlion '100,000 t00.000 100,000 100,000 600.000 7otll EzpenAiturex 100,000 100,000 � 700.0�0- �700,000 800,000 G2nta I Other Sou�ces: 158 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capifal Facitities Plan Six Year_Capital FadlRles Plan, 2015-2020 EnterpNse Funds Project rUe: Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update Project No: cp1405 Project Type: Non-Capacity Projec[ Manager Carlaw Description: Update fhe Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan to be consisterrt with Ne Cilys overall Comprehensive Plan update as required by the State of Washington. P�ogress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activky. 2014 VE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2014 Edimate 2015 BudBet 2U78 Budget ProJec!Tobl Unrestncted Storm Revenue 340,000 10,000 350,000 Giants-Securetl(Fetl,Stafe,Local) BorM PiotBedS Ofher Total Funding Sourws; 340,000 10,000 350,000 Gpital E:penditurea Design 340.000 10.000 35p.ppp R79M o/ Way CbI15INC1%O/l rmai �penaim.as: aao;000 �o,000 aso,oao Forecasted ProJebt Cost: Tobl 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funtling Sourcec: UnrestrVctetl Storm Revenue 250,000 260,000 Grants-Securad(Fed,Stale,Lxel) Bond Proceeds _ Other Tofal FunAing Sources: 2W,000 260,000 Gpltal EupenAltures: �5�9� 250,000 260,000 Right d Way _ Construction Tofal Expend(hres 250,000 260,000 G2Ms/Other Soumes: 159 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital FabtlHies Plan S6c Year CapMal Faellkles Plan,20�5-2020 Enterprise Funtls Projectrne: M ill Creek Wetland SK Reach Restoratfon Projeet No: CP0748 ProjectType: Non-CapaCity ProjeetMariager. Mdersen D6scriptlon: Mi0 Creek Wetlantl SK reach(W5K)is a stream res[oratlon prvject ro pro�ide improwd corn�eyance and habitat abng an appro�dmate one mile reach W Mill Creek between West Main Street and SR�67 The project i nclud_es coretruction of a new larger stream cuWert at 151h Street NW for impro�d hytiraulic cornreyance.and fish passage,removal of irrvasive �egehation,nati�.e tree and stvub plarrtrigs. The project is being conducted in partnership with tte Artny Corps of Ergireers�mder ihe Corps'Ecosystem Restoretion Program.The Citys wst share tor construction is 35%,and the fetleral cost share is 65%.The value M Cily-owned WnCs used for ihe project are c2dited towarcJ the Citys cost share. Total fede2l firWirg for the proJect(not shown below)is appropmatey$3.9 million basetl on llia most recerrt Corps estimates of�$8 million for total project costs. Progress Summary• Tha City has executed a tlesign agreemerrt with Cie Army Corps of Ergineers,and 35 percerrt of tlesign vras completed in 20�2;firel design is schedWed to complete in eary20�4.Ne#steps inclutle reai estate and rigM of way acqusitloNcerbfieatlon,with corstructlon schedWed for 2014-20'15.A Project Partriership(corstructlon)ag2emerrt�vill neetl lo be ezecuted between the City and ttia Corps priorlo real estate acqWsition and consVuctlon. Future Impact on Operatlng Budget Moritoring arxl mairrterence d�aing tlie req�rired 5 year mordtoring period is part of ttia o�.erall projectcosis. AeLivlry: zou ve �zo�a veer�a Funtling Sources: Prlor ro 2076 EstlmaOa 2015 BuC t 20t8 Butl at Pro aU Tofal GeneialFuntl 29,798 29.'198 Urvesfncfetl5tormReranue 23,590 1.10'I.4t0 5,000 5,000 t.t35.000 Grsnts-Securetl(Fetl,State,LocaQ 289,693 282.000 250,000 BOt,693 Gty(Real Es[afe Ownetl) - - Tofel FunEing Sourcea: 322,481 �.383,410 255,000 S,OOU 1,865,891 CaPffal Erzpendlturas Desiyn 327,521 48,4'10 389,93t Righfo/Wey %0 350,000 250.000 600,960 LERRD(]etlrt (900,000) Construchon 1,885 000 5 000 5,000 1 890 000 TotelF�cpBnClWrea: 322.481 1.389.410 255,000 5,000 1,960,897 Forecasted Projeet Cost: Total 2077 2018 2078 2020 2013-2U20 Funding Sourees ---' " - -"-'-- - "'- "-' ' -- General Funtl - Unrestr/cled Stam Revenue 55,000 55,000 5,000 725,000 GreMs-Securetl(Fetl.Sfate.Locel) - - 250.000 Gty(Rea/Estate OxnedJ - - Total FunGing Sourcea: 55,000 35,000 5,000 - 375,000 Capltal ExpenCifuias Design - Po'9�t of W aY 250.000 Construction SS,D00 55.000 S.OW_ 125,000 Totel F�cpanCilurea: 55,000 55,000 5,000 - 375,OOf 160 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan $TORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) CapiWl Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project T�tie: Eastridge Manor Outfall Replacement Project No: cp1316 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Matt Larson Description: Replace the epsting deteriorated ou[fall with new High Dersity PolyeUrylene (HDPE). Two existing outfalis may be combined into a sirgle outfall. hnprovemerrts to the GoH Course corneyance system may be needed. Progress Summary: None FutuPe Im{iad on Opereting Budget: None Activity. 2014 YE ?A15 Year End Funding Sourcex Prior ro 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Project Total UnresfnctedSfam Revenue 7100 350,000 810,000 1,787100 Gren[s- Secured(Fed,Stafe,Locaq BorW PmceeUs _ Other Total Funding Sources: 7100 350,000 810,000 1,767100 Capifal 6Pendihires Deslgn 7100 165.000 172.100 RlgM o� Way 185,000 185,000 cw,sm,cuw, a�o.000 e�o.000 Total Erzpendiwres: 7,100 350,000 810,000 1,167100 Forecasted Project Cost: - roml 2017 2078 2019 2020 207i2020 Funding Sources UnresMcted Stam Revanue - 810.000 Grants- Secured(Fed,State,local) _ Bond Proceeds _ Other Total Funding Sourcex -� _ g�p ppp Capital Erzpendlwres: Desl9n ' ' ' Right ol Way Construction 810.000 Topl F�cpendfL�res: - 810,000 G2Ms /Other Sources: 161 City of Auburn Draft Capital Fqcilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capftal Facllities Plan Six Year Capipl FaoilRies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds_ Project Title: BNSF Utilities Crossing Project No: cp1308 Pro)ect Type: Non-Capacity Projed Manager Kim Truong Description: Replace or eMerid as needed the epsting crossirg casings to accommodate the 3rd rail improvement. Progress Summary• Project design will be complete in 2014 and construction is an6cipated to start in early October Future Impaot on Ope�ating Budget: None Activity: 201a YE 2015 vear Ena FunAing Soureea . _P.dor_ro 2016 6rimate 2075 ButlBet 2018 Budgat Project Tolal UnrestAeted Sform Reeenue 41,356 10,000 51,358 Gianfs-Secured(Fed,Stffie,Lacal) - Bond ProceeUs 97.583 402,417 500,000 Ofher Total Funding Sourtas: 97,583 443.775 70,000 551,358 Capital ErzpsnOituroB: Des/gn 97,583 40,131 137,7t4 Rlght oI Way Constrt�cfion 403.642 _ 10,000_ 413,842 Total ExpandiMes: 97,583 443.77] 70,000 551,358 Foreca§ted Projed Cost: ToUI 20» zo�e 2ota zuzo zoiszoio Funding Sourcea Unrestncte0 Sform Revenue 10,000 Granfs-Secured(Fed,Stete,Loca/) - Bontl Proceeds - Otl�er 7ofal FunEing Sourcee: 10,000 Capipl ExpendiNrea Design - Wght d Way r.OIiSINCflOI1 10.�00 rorai�pena�mras: +o.oa GraMs I Othar Sources: 162 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20752020 Enterprise Funds ProjectT�tle: Composting Facility Projed No: CPxxxx ProjectType: Non-Capacity ProjectManager• TBD Description: Property acquisition and site improvemerrts to consVuct a composting facility. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Opereting Budget: � Impacts to the operating budget will be analyzed and calculated once the timirg of expenses is determined. /►ctivity. 2014 YE 2a15 Year Entl Funding Sources: PAor.b 2074 Estimab 2015 Budget 2018 BUA9et Prqact Tofal Unrestncfed Stam Rarenue - Grarrts-Secmad(Fed,State,Loce!) _ Bond Proceeds _ Other Total FunAing Sources: Gp1181 ExpenClturox Desi9n Righf ol Way - r.OlISfNCf/0I1 rorai F�Cpeomwrec _ F.orecasted Prbject Cost: rora� 2017 2018 2079 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources: Un2stncted Stam Revenue 750,000 750,000 GreMs-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Local) BwM Pioceeds _ Ofhe� Total Funding Sources 750.000 750.000 Capinl F�pentllWres Des�gn _ RigM ol Wey 750,000 75p,ppp (�.p/ISt2Cf(011 Tofal EzPentlituras: 750.000 750,000 G2rrts/Othm Sources� 163 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRi41NAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities P1an Six Yea[Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project TiUe: Hillside Drainage Assessment Project No: cpxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager. TBD Description: The existing dreinage system includes pipes ttiat discharge arer hillsides.While a preliminary inventory antl mapping of locations has been completed,field-locating and detailed inspection is warrarHed lo d�ne deficiencies. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budge;: None Activity: 2014 YE 20t5 Vear Entl Funding Sourqs Prior b 2074 Eatlmate 2075 BUC at 2076 BuA at Pr act.Tohl UnresMctetl Storm Rewnue �� = 150,000 150,000 150,OD0 Grants-Secuiatl(Fetl,State,Loca/) - Bond Proceeds - Othar Total Funding Souices '150.00D 750.000 750,000 GpiLl Ezpenditures Deslgn 150,000 150.000 RigM d Wey 50,000 Carrxtructfon ..tU0.000 Total Expe_ntlituroc 150,000 750.000 t50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: � Totel 2017 2018 2019 2020 2015-2020 FunCfng Sourcds: Unrestrtcted Stwm Revenue 150,000 450,000 Grents-Secured(Fed Stefe,Local) BOM Proceads Ot/rer Tobl Ftinding Sources 150,000 450,000 CapkalEnPentliNraa Design 150,000 PogM d 6Yey 50,000 ConsINCHon 150,000 2W,000 7otal ExpentliWres: 150,000 � � � 450,000- G2rrts/Other Sources' 164 Citv ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capitai Pacii'ities Plan Six Year CapiWl Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project TUe: North Airport Area Improvements Project Na: Cpxxx Project 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Desbription: This project would provide atlditional storage depth in Pond I antl replace the existirg inlet pipe at a lower invert to the pond, and install a bablClow preverrter at the ouUet. The project also includes the installffiion of a second bacMlow preventer at the overFlow to 30th St NE to protect the hangar area. Progress Summary: Fudire Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: PAor b 2014 Estlmate 2015 BudBet 2016 BuAget ProJecY Total Unreslnctetl Storm Revanua 40,000 135,000 40,000 GiaMs-Secured(Fed,State,Loce/) Bond Proceetls Other Tofal FunEing Sourcea: 40,000 735,000 40,000 �O�m��Pentliturec Desi9� 40.000 40.000 Ri9ht ol Way Construction 135,000 7otal EcpanCih�res 40,000 135,000 40,OD0 Forecasted Project Cost: - TOTaI 2017 T018 2019 2020 201SM20 Funding Sourcen: UnresMcted Storm Revenue 175,000 Grants-Secuietl(Fed,Sfete,LocaQ Borrd Pioceeds Other Total Funtling Sourcas: 775,000 Caplfal Fxpenditurea: Design 40,000 Righf W Wey Consfn�cflon 135,000 Total Ficpentlltuma 175,000 G2nts/Other Sources: 165 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUNb (432) Capitai Facilities Plan Six Year Capital FacilRfes Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project TiUe: D St. SE Storm Improvement Project No: cpxxx Projea Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Desalptbn: - - -- This project would replace the existing line from 21st St SE to 23rd St. SE and Install a new eMension to 25th St. SE.The proJect will eliminate an e�dstirg dryrvell near 25th & D St. SE Progress Summa"ry: Future Impact on Opereting Budget• Norre Activity• 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources Prlor b 2076 F81ma[a 2075 BuCget T018 Budget Project Total Unrestncted Storm Revenue - Gronts-Securerl(Fetl,State,Loca/) Band ProceaUs - Other Tofal Funding Sources: ' - - -- - - Capibl Expandilures Desfyn R/gM ol Wey COrtSfNCtldl Total Expenditures - Forecasted ProJect Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2015-2020 _ Funtling Souims - '- - --'-- ' ' -- ' -- ' ' ' UnresMcfed Sform Revenue 75,000 600,000 675,000 Grents-Secured(Fed,State,Loca!) - BwM Proceeds - ori,el rorai Fu�moe sources: �s.000 soo,000 - e�s.000 CaPltai ExpentllWres Design 75,000 75,000 RlgM d Way ConSfNCIIon 600.000 600,000 Total EzOe�ditures 75,000 800,000 - - - �675.000 Grants/Other Sowces� 166 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan STORM DRAINAGE FUND (432) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds aroject r�Ue: Annexation Area Small Storm Improvement Project No: cpxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager• TBD Description: Improve euisting drainage condkions for the annexation areas. Progress Summary• Futuie �mpact on Opereting Budget: None Activity: zou re ¢ois rear ena Funding Sources Prlor ro 2074 Eerimate 20�5 Budgat 2076 Budget Pro ect Total Unrestncted Storm Revenue ' — - 40,000 280.000 40,000 Grants-Securetl(Fed,Sfefe,LocaQ Bond Proceetls Otlrer Total Funding Sourcex 40,000 260,000 40,000 Capidl Expanditures Desiqn 40,000 40,000 R/ght o/ Way 50,000 r.0/ISfNCfI0I1 '1�0��0 Total Bcpentlib�rea 40,000 260,000 40,000 ForeeasteH ProJect Cost: Tofa I 20'17 20t8 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: UroesMctetl Sform Ravenue 40.000 260,000 600,000 Grants-Secuietl(Fetl.Stffie.Loca/) _ Bond Proceetls _ Other Total Funding Sources — - 40,000 260,000 600.000 CaPibl Ezpentliturex Design 40,000 80,000 R/ght W Way 50,000 100,000 ConsWction 210,000 420,000 Total EzpanAiWres: 40,000 260,OOD 600,000 Grants/Othe�Sources. 167 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY C�F � � �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 168 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SOLID WASTE Current Facilities The City of Auburn no longer has recycle drop station facilities. The City now provides curbside service through a vendor who handles the disposal. 169 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED ��o City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan PARKS, ARTS AND RECREATION Current Facilities The City of Aubum's park system consists of a total of 735.53 acres of neighborhood and community parks, special use areas, open space, and linear parks (trails). The 150-acre Auburn Municipal Golf Course is identified as a separate public facility in this report, and is not included in the Parks and Recreation inventory Table PR— 1 "Facilities Inventory' lists all park and recreation land in the City's park system along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS provided by the City's park system represents the existing inventory of City- owned park acres divided by the 2014 City population of 74,630. This equates to 0.86 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.16 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.44 acres for linear parks, 4.66 acres for open space, and 0.73 acres for special use areas. The proposed LOS provided by the Citys park system represents the planned 2020 inventory of City-owned park acres divided by the 2020 projected City population of 85,288. This equates to 0.86 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.46 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.38 acres per 1,000 population for linear parks, 4.08 acres per 1,000 population for open space, and 0.64 acres per 1,000 population for special use areas. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Parks and Recreation facilities include seventeen capital projects at a cost of$24,205.000. Table PR-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets s.howing the project detail. Impact on Future Opereting Budgets As Table PR— 3 shows, operating budget impacts of$891,000 are forecasted for parks and recreation facilities during the six years 2096 —2021 171 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-1 Facilities Inventory Parks, Arts and Recreation, Land ca�aaTv - -- - FACILITY (Acres) LOCATION Neighborhood Parks: wstin /nvent 21st Street Playground 0.20 2'Ist Street SE & D Street SE ubu�ndale Park 10.00 31700 '108th NE allard Park 0.70 37th 8 R Street SE Cameron Park 3.90 Lemon Tree Lane 8 Academy Dri�,e Cedar Lane Parlc 8.30 25th & K Street SE Dorthy Bothe!l Park 4.00 570� Lakeland Hills WaySE ykstra Park 1 70 1533 22nd A�renue NE orest ViUa mini-park 0.20 17th & Fr SVeetSE Gaines Park � 40 '11th NW& W ValleyHighway Gree» River Property '10.00 104th SVeet SE ndian Tom Park 0.40 6th & HenryRoad NE ornada Park 'I.90 1440 U CourtNW ersey 3 Park #1 'I.80 Charlotte A�,e SE 8 Eaergreen Way SE ersey 3 Park #2 2.10 56th Street SE & Udall Arenue SE akeland Hills Park 5.00 540� Oli�e A�,enue SE otary Park 4.00 27th � Alpine Street SE Scootie Brown Pa�k 'I 70 Sth & Henry Road NE Shaughnessy Park 3.50 21 st& Hem lock SE Termina! Park 1.20 12th 8 C Street SE Trai! Run Pa�k 1.21 Vi/lage Square '1.07 310th St SE Qa 120th Aw Total Neighborhood Parks 64.28 Pro osed Ca acit Pro' s: ubumdale ll Park 9.34 29700 118th Street SE Total Proposed Capaclty Projects 9.34 2020 Projected Inventory Total - Nelghborhood Parks- 73.62 Community Pa�ks xistin lnvento . rannan Park 2'I 70 26th 8 M Street NE enster/Green RiverAccess '13.40 10520 PuburnBlack Diamond Road ulme�Field 5.00 51h & K SVeet NE Game Farm Park 63.00 3226 V SVeetSE Game Farm Wildemess Park 20.00 2401 SE Stuck Ri�r Road GSA Pa�k 6.60 C Street SW 8 15th SW saac Evans Park 14.90 29627 Green Ri�er Road NE ea Hil1 Park 7 00 SE 316th & 124th SUeet SE' es Gove Park 20.50 11th & Aubum WayS !!Pond 4.00 600 Ora�etz R6ad O/son Canyon Fa�mstead 'I5.00 28728 Green Ri�er Road oegner Park 2� 60 601 Oravetr Road Sunset Parlc 15.00 1306 69th Street SE Veteran's Memoria! Rark 8.50 Park A"enue & Aubum Way N Total Community Parks 236.20 172 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-1 (continued) Provosed Caoacitv Proiects: Jacobson Tree Farm 29.04 13009 SE 294th Street LakelandHills 30.00 KerseyWay Tota/ Proposed Capacity Projects 59.04 2020 Projected Inventory Total aCommunityParks- 295.24 Linear Parks: Existina lnventorv: /nterurban Trail 25.40 Lakeland Hills Trai! 2.30 540'I Olire A�enue SE White River Trail 4.90 Total Linear Parks 32.60 Proposed Cepacitv Proiects: None Tofa/ Proposed Capacity Projects - 2020Projected Inventory Total - Linear Parks- 32.60 Special Use Areas: Enistina lnventorv: Bicentennia! Park 1 40 SR-�88Pubum WayS Centennia/ VieKpoint Park 0.70 600 Nbuntain View Drive i City Hall Plaza 0.90 25 W Main Clark Plaza 0.20 15th &AUburn Way N 8 Street Plaza 0.10 E. Main &B StreetSE Plaza Park 0.'IS 25 W Main Mountain View Cemetery 50.00 2020 Nbuntain view Drive Pioneer Cemetery 0.80 8th &ALbum Way N Slaughte� Memorial 0.20 3�OOAuburn WayN Total Special Use Areas 54 45 Proposed Capacitv P�oiects: None Tota/Proposed Capacity Projects - 2020 Projected Inventory Total - Special Use Areas- 54 45 Open Space Areas: Existino lnventorv.� Aubum Environmental Park Open Space 120.00 Westem A�.e NW and Maint Street Cla�k Property 25.00 '16000ra�.e�Road Gaine Farm Open Space 87 00 2400 SE Stuck Riwr Road Golf Course Open Space 42.00 29B89 Green Ri"ar Road Green River Property 10.00 3�5th Street Se & �04th Way SE Lakeland Native Area '10.00 Oraae�Road Olson Canyron Open Space 45.00 28728 Green Ri�.er Road West Au6um Lake PropeRy Open Space 9.00 N ofS 321stand westof W St.NW Tota! Open Space A�eas 348.00 ?ro osed Ca acit P�o"ecis: None Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2020 ProJected Inventory Total - Open Space Areas- 348.00 173 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-2 CAPITAL FACIL-ITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING PARKS, ARTS and REGREATION (Municipal Parks Construction Fund) 2075 2078 2017 Y016 2019 2U20 Total CewiM ProfeCts: 1 Park AequlskionsfDevelopment Capital Costs - 125.000 125,000 125,000 375,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - - - - - - G2nis (Fed,State,Loql) - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 375,000 Subtotal, Capacky Projects: Capital Costs - - 125,000 725,000 725,000 - 375,OD0 Nort�Caoacitv Profeets: 2 Isaac Evans Pa7k Capital CosLs 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - 50,000 - - 50,000 CxanS (Fed,Shate,Local) - - - - - - Other(Park Impact Fee) - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 3 Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Capital Costs - 12,000,000 - - - 12,000,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local) 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 Other(De�eloper) - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 Bond Proceeds - - 6,000,000 - - 6,000,000 4 Aubum CommunRy and Youth!('een Center Capihal CosS 300,000 6,300,000 - - - - B,800,000 Funding Sources REET 1 300,000 759219 - - - 1,059,279 Oth-er - 4,540,781 4;540,781 Grents (Fed,State,Local) - 3,000,000 - - - 3,000,000 5 Les Guve Park Improvements Capital Costs 40,000 260,000 - 300,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Loca.l) - - - - - - KC Prop 2 40,000 260,000 - - - - 300,000 6 Rotary Park Improvements Capital Cosls - 30,000 - - - 30,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - 30,000 - - - 30,000 GranLs (Fed,Slate,Local) - - - - - - - Other - - - - 174 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-2(continued) zo�s zo�s zo» zo�s zo�s zoso raei NortCaoacitv Proiects: � 7 Mise.Parks ImprovemeMs Capifal CosS 100,000 100,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 900,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local) 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 400,000 Other(Park Impact Fee) 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000_ 400,000 8 Cameron Park Capital CosCs - - 55,000 55,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - - 25,000 25,000 GranS (Fed.Sqte,Local) - - 30,000 30,000 Other - - - - 9 Geme Fartn Park ImprovemeMs Capital CosS - - 40,000 - - 40,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance - 40,000 - - - 40,000 GrenLs (Fed,Sfate,Local) - - - - - - aner - - - - - 10 Gaines Park Capital Costs - 30,000 - - 30,OOD Funding Sources Fund Balance - - 30,000 - - 30,000 Grants (Fed,Slate,Local) - - - Other - - 11 Roegner Park CapiYal Costs - 50,000 - 50,000 �� Funding Sources ' Fund Balance - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Granls (Fed,State,Local) - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - - - 12 Auburndale Park I Capital Costs 25,000 - 350,000 - 375,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance 25,OD0 - - - - - 25,000 KC Prop 2 - 100,000 - - 100,000 Olher(Park Impact Fee) - 250,000 - 250,000 13 Au6urndale Park II � Capital Cosk 25,000 - - 575.000 600,000 Funding Sources Fund Balance 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Granls (Fed.Shate,Local) - - - - - OUier - - - 575,000 - - 575,000 14 Sunset Park Capital Costs 15,000 385,000 - 400,000 Funding Sources Fund 8alanca - - - - - Otlier(ParklmpactFee) 75,000 185,000 - - 200,000 Otlier,(Contributions) - 200,000 - - 200,000 175 City ofAuburri Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-2(continued) 2015 2076 2077 2078 2019 2020 Total Non-Caoackv Proiects: 15 BPA Trail on Lea FGII Capital CosLs - - - 150,000 150,000 Punding Sources Fund Balance - - - Qants (Fetl,Sfate,Local) - - - 150,000 150,000 KC ProD 2 - - - - - - 16 Wkeland Parkll4 Capital Cosfs - - 25,000 150.000 - - 175,000 Funding Souroes Fund Balance - 25,000 - - 25,000 Other - - 150,000 750.000 17 Fenster Levee Setback, Phase 26 Capital Costs 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Funding Sources GrenLs (Fed,State,Local) - - - - - - - Other(Storm) 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Subtotal. Nor►Cauacitv Proiects: Capital Costs 530,000 9,145,000 12,350,000 1,250,000 230,000 325,000 23,830,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacily Projecls - 125,000 125,000 125,000 - 375,OOG Non-Capaaty Projects 530,000 9,145,000 12,350,000 1,250,000 230,000 325,000 23,830,000 Total Costs 530,000 9,145;000� 72;475,000 - -7,375,000 - �355;000 �325,000� 24,205,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 200,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 400,000 Grants (Fed,Sfate,Local) 50,000 3,050,000 2,075,000 75,000 105,000 225,000 5,580,D00 REET 1 300,000 759,219 - - - - 1,059,219 Bond Proceeds - 6,000,000 - 6,000,000 KC Prop 2 40.000 260,000 125,000 225,000 125,000 - 775,000 Other-Parks Impact 65,000 285,000 75,000 325,000 75,000 75,000 900,000 Otlier 25,000 4,740,781 4,000,000 725,000 - - 9,490,78'I Tohal Funtling 430,000 9,745,000 12,475,000 7,375,000 355,000 325,000 24,205,OOD 176 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,20752020 Capkal Projeets Fund Projectr�ue: Park Acquisitions/Development Project No: CpXXXX ProjectType: CapaCity Project Manager Da�yl FabBr Description: Land acq�nsitioru to occur based on demand and deficiencies including parks,open space,trails and cortidors. Progress Summary: - Future Impaet on Operating Budget: None Activity� (PreHous 2 Vrs.) 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources: Prior to 2014 Estlmate _20t5 Butlget 2018 Budget Broject Tofal FurM 321 -Unrestncted FurM Ba/ance � - '- - --'-- c�.as-s��.ae�Fed,srare,t oceq Borrd Proceeds _ Genera/Funtl TranSfar In �,5pp �,gpp KC Prop2' 127,Q58 23914 251,372 Total Funding Soureos: Y27.658 48.616 273.872 Capital EnpentliNrea: Des/gn Ac4u/s/Nan 22�458 46.4t4 273.8�2 CWIS�NCL/OI) Total ExpendlWrea 227,458 48,474 279,872 Forecasted�Project C ost: - roai 2017 2078 20t9 202D 20152020 Funding Soureea: - ' - FuiM 321 -Unrestricted Fund Belence _ GiaMs-Secured(Fed.State,Locel) Bmd PioceeUs General FurM Trens/er fn KC Prop 2' 125,000 125,000 125,000 375,000 Total Funding Sourcos: 125,000 125,000 725,000 375,000 Capital Expentlituren: Des/gn Acqu/s/tlon 125,000 125,000 125,000 375,000 QOIISfNL(IOII 7ota1 Expantlitures: 125,000 125,000 725,000 375,000 GraMs/Olher Sources: 177 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) CapitalFdcilRiesPWn Six Year Capital Fa¢ilities Plan, 2015-2020 Capkal ProJects F.und ProjectTine: Isaac Evans Park Project No: Cpxxxx Projea7ype: Non-Capacity Projed Manager Daryl Faber Deac�i{ition: - Repair trail throughout park, improve playground and develop reforestation plan. Progress Summary: None Future Irtipaet on Operatlng Budget: Increased mowing ard u6lities-$6,000 Activity 2014 YE 2015 Year End FunCing Souroee: Pr7or ro 2014 f�lmate 2075 BuOget 2078 BUAgot Projaet Total FuMI 321 -Unrestricted FunU Belence Sp,ppp - crarvs-secured�Fea,srare,�xeq _ _ BOM Proceeds - REET - Other(Park Impacf Fee)' SO.00p Tota1 Funtlinp Souress: 100.000 - Capifal Expendlwrea Desfgn 70,000 Right o/ Way ConstrucNon 80,000 Topl EzpenAliurec 100,000 - Forecasted�Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2078 2020 207&2020 FunCing Sources: Fund 321 -UruestncleO Fund Balaxe 50,000 Giems-Securea(Fee,State,t.ocaq - Bmd Proceeds REET - Other(Park /mpact Fee)• 50,000 Tobl FunEing Sourcea: t00,00D CaPital Expenditures: Des/gn �0,000 R/gM oi Wey - Const/utt/on 90.000 Total EcpendlWrea 100,OW Grorits/Other Sources: 1�g City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS COWSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Faeilities Plan Sbc Year Capital Facilities Plan,20�52020 Capital Prbjects Fund ProjectTitle: Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Pro}ect t�lo: cp0609 ProjectType: Non-Capacity Project Manager• Daryl Faber Description: Implemerrt Master Plan for the development of this 31 acre site. Lea Hill area is deficieM in park ac2age. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: �- -- - - - No significant impact due to master plan. Fuhae park devalopmerrt will result in maintenance and uUlity e�enses undetertninable at tlds time. Activky. 2014 YE 2075 Year EnA Funding Sauroea: PAor to 2074 Eatlmate 2015 Butlget 2018 Budget Proiect Total FUM 327 Lnrestncted FurM Balance 25,321 25,321 Grants-Unsecured(Fetl,Stafe.Loce!) _ Barid Proceeds - REET Other(Development) Total Funding Sources: 25.327 25,921 Capifal ExOantlituros: Dasign 25,321 25,321 RigM o/ Wey COlISINC710/I Totil ExpentliWrcs 25,32t 25,721 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcas: Fund 3Yf -Unrestncted Fund Balance _ GraMs-Unsecured(Fer/,State,Locaq 2,000,000 2,000,000 BmtlProceeds 6,000,000 6,000,000 REET Other(Deve/opment) 4,000,000 4,Opp,ppp Total Funding Sources: 12.000.000 72,000.000 Capital F�pantliwros: De5/gn �.000.000 7,000.000 Po'ght d Way Constn�ction 71,000,000 11,00O.00D Tofal Erzpenditurea: 12,000,000 12,000,000 G2M5/Other SourGes: 179 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARK$ CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Faclities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Capifal Projecffi Fund Projeccrtie: Auburn Community and YouthlTeen Center Project No: cp0925, cp1412 Proiectry�e: Non-Capacity Project Manager� Daryl Faber Deseription: Construct a new 15,100 sq. ft. Community CerRer facility as well as repurpose the ebstirg Parks, Recrea6on and Arts Administration building irdo a YoutNTeen Cerrter The project includes site improvemerrts associated v�M the construction at Les Gove Campus arcl 3,000 sq. ft. of adminisVative space for the Parks Departrnerrt,meetirg,aciivity and fitness space as well as a dedicated youth/teen center The State has allocated $3 million of the capifal budget W tl�e City to fund the project. Progress Summary• Design in 2014 &2015, bid and begin construction in 2015 with constr�tion completed in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual operating budgetfiscal impact is estimated to be $150,000 Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Vear End FunNng Sources Priw m?A14 Etimate 2015 Bud9et 2078 Budget ProJed Total Fwd 321 Lmestncted Furnd Balance GrdMs- Secared State - 3,000,000 REE71 92,046 400,000 300,000 759,219 792,046 Other (Sdid waste Fees) 7,000,000 - 1,000,000 O[her 4,540.781 Total Funding Sources: 1,092,046 40D,000 300,000 8,300,000 1,792,046 Cepipl ErzpendiWres: PropertyAcquisttlon Des/gn 900,857 400,000 300,000 1,600,857 DemWltlon 191.189 791,189 ConstrucNon 8,300.000 Total Espendlturex 1,092,048 400,000 300,000 8,300,000 1,792,048 Forecasted Projeqt Cost: Tomi �17 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Source� Fund 321 -Umeshicfed FurM Balance - - GreMs- Secuied State 3,000,000 REET 1 1.Q59.219 Other (Sol�d Waste Fees) - Ofher 4.540 781 Total Funding Sources: - - 8,600,000 Capital F�cpendiWres: PmpertyAcqulsltlon Des/gn 300,000 Pro/essional SeMces ConstrucNon 8,300,000 Total Expenditures - - - 8,600,00! Grarrts I Other Sources: Washing[on State capital bWget appropriation thiough the Department of Commarce ig� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilkles Plan Six Year_Capital Facilities Plan,20�52020 Capital PrbJects Fund Projectrne: Les Gove Park Improvements Project No: cpxxxx ProJectType: Non-Capacity Projec[Manager Fabe� Description: Based on "to be completed' Les Goee Masier Plan,design and implemerrt recommendations tlet will Increase user safety, exourage public ise and commimiry connectivity. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: $5,000 Utilities AcUvlty 2014 YE 2075 Vear End FunAing Sourcen: PNor ro 2014 Fstlmale 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Pro ect Total FUM 32f -Unrestncfed Fund Ba/ance GraMs-Securetl(Fed,Stefe,Local) Bond Proceeds REET KC Prop 2 40.000 260,000 40.000 Total Funding Sources: 40,000 260,000 40,000 Capibl Ezpantli4ires Dasign 40,000 10,000 40.000 RigM d Wey ConStNGflon 250,000 Total Expenditurea: 40,OOD 260,000 40,000 Forecaste0 Project Cost: Tofal 2017 20t8 2019 2020 201b2020 Funding$ourees: Furni 321 -Unrestncted Fmrd Balance _ GrerKs-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Loce/) 6ond Proceeds REET KC Prop 2 gp0.ppp Tofal FunEing Sourcas: 300,000 CaPibl EzpsntliWroa Design Sp�ppp R(gM d Wey ConslNLtlon 250.000 Total F�tpentliturea: 300,000 Grants/Other Soumes� I81 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year CapMal Facilttles Plan,2015-2020 Capital Projects.Fund Proiect r�ne: Rotary Park Improvements Project No: cpxxxx ProjectType: Non-Capacity Project Manager Faber Descrlptlon: Coordinate improoemer�s with neighborhood and Rotary Club of A�um to add walking path. Progress Summary: Future Impa¢t ori Opeiating Budget: None Activiry• - - - 2014 YE 2015 Vear End FundingSourees: PAor.W2014 6tlmate 2015Butl9et_._.20188udget. __P.roJeotTctal _ FurM 321 -UnrosMcted Funtl Belance - ' Grerrts-Secured(Fed,State,Cqcel) 8ond Proceeds REET Other Tofal Funtling$ou�ces: - Capipl ExpendiNrec Pesign RlgM d Way Const/uctfon Total F�cpenClWres - Foreaasted Projeet Costi Tofel 2077 20t8 2019 2020 2075-2020 Funding SOureeB: -- " ' ' � - -- — Fund 321 -Unrestncted Fund Belence 30,000 30,000 �ra.rcs-sec�ied�Fee,sraee,�xeq Bmd Proceetls REET Other TOTaI Funding Source8: 30.000 30.000 Capifal ExpendiWraa Design 5,000 5,000 RlgM d Way Constructim 25,000 25,000 7ofal ExpendiNna 30,000 30.Ob GraMs/Other Sources: 1g2 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (327) Capital PaeilRies Plan SIx Year Capital Facilkies Plan,20152020 Capital Projects Fund Projectrue: M iscellaneous Parks Improvements Projea r�o: cpxxxx Project7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Faber Description: Miror park improeemer�s including shetters, roofs,play�roinds, irtigation and restrooms. Progress Summary• - - Future Impact on Operating Budget: None AeUvity (PreHous 2 Vrs) 2014 VE 2015 Year EnC PunGing Sources Pdor ro 2014 Esflmats 2075 Butlget 2018 Bud et .P.iqect Total FurM 327 -Uniastticted FuiW Balance - -- -� _ - GraMs-Urnsecured State 50,000 50,000 50.000 Bwrtl Pioceeds REET Other(Perk lmpect Fee)' 10.922 Sp.00p 5p.00p �p.g22 Tofal FunOing Sources: 70,922 t00,000 t00,000 770,922 Caplpl EzpenElWres: Design R1gM ol Way Const2ction 70,922 100,000 100,000 110,922 Total ExpanGlturos: �0,922 �00,000 100,000 110,822 forewsted ProJect Cost: Tobl 2077 2018 2019 2020 207S2U2U Funtling Sources: - ' - - FurM327 -UnrastrlctedFUMBalance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 100,000 Grants-Unsecuretl State 75,000 75,000 75.000 75,000 400,000 Bmtl Proceetls REET OtYrer (Perk Impect Fee)` 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 400 000 Tofal Funtling Sources: 775,000 175,000 775,000 175,000 900,000 Capftal ExpendiWres: Design Rfght d Way _ Construc[ion 175.000 175,000 175,000 175,OOD 900,000 Total Expendlturex 175.000 775,000 775,000 775,000 900,000 G2rrts/O[her Sources: 183 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS GONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Faeilkies PWn Six Year Capltal FacllRies Plan,2075-2020 Capkal ProJects Fund ProjeotTne: Cameron Park Project No: CpXXXX ProjectType: Non-Capaeity Project Mareger Faber Description: This project will impro�e the pedestrian trail and add landscape arxl fencing W serve as buffer to ihe nefghborhood arid play strucMe. l7ds project is iderrtifietl in ihe Partcs trnpro�merrt Plan. Prog�ess Summary• Future Impact on Opereting Butlget: None AetWky: - - - 2014 YE 2075 Year Entl Funtling Sources: PriorW 2014 Estlmafe .2075 Butlget. . 2018 Bud t __Prcject Topl FurM 327 -UnresWcted FuM Belanca ' Grants-Unsecured(Fed,Sfafe,Local) - Bmd Proceeds - REET - - O[her Tonl FunAing Sourcea Capltal EzpenCiturer. Deslgn wgnr w way - Consrrticrion Total Expentlltures: - Foreeasted Project Cost: Tobl 2077 2018 _2079_._._ 2020._ 2075-2020 Funtling Sourees: Funtl32f -UniasfnctedFuntlBalance 25,000 25,000 Grams-Unsecurad(Fed,Sfate.Locaq 30,000 30,000 8ond Pioceeds - REET Other Totll FunAing Sources: 55,000 SS,000 Caplfal F�cpantllturea Design 5,000 5,000 R/9ht d WaY _ Consbuctton 50.00U 5�.000 Total Enpenditurex 55.000 55,000 Grerrts/Other Sourcas: 184 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capitai Facilkies Plan Siu Year Capital Faeilities PWn,20152020 Capital Projects_Fund ProjectTine: Game Farm Park Improvements Project No: CpXXXX Projearype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Faber Deseription: trnpro�e interior lighting ard patlmays ard provide access from the newly acq�red property on soWrwest comer of the park. Progress Summary� Future Impact on Operating Budget: - None Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prior to 2014 F�imate 2075 Butlget Y018 Butlget Projec!Total Fund 311 -UnresMctad FurM Be/ence - Grants-Securetl(Fed,Stete,loca!) BaM Proceeds REET Of/rer Tolal Funding Sources: c Gpibl Expentlilures: Design R/gM o/ Way _ Construction Total EupenOitures _ Forecasted Project Cost: 7otal 2017 20t8 2078 2020 201Y2020 FunCing Sources: - � Funtl321 -Unrnstnctad Fund Balence 40,000 40,000 Grants-Secured(Fed,Stale,Lwal) 8aM Ploceeds REET Othef Tobl Fundfng Sources: 40,000 40,000 Capipl EaPentlitures Design R/gM d Way Construction 40,000 40.000 7otal EzpendlNres 40,000 40,000 Grarrts/Other Sources. 185 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities PIa4 Snc Year CapiFal Fadlities_Plan,20152020 Capital Projects Fund Projea rtle: Gaines Park Project No: CpX7(X7C aro]ectrype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Fdbe� Descriptlon• De�elop HorticWhae Plan for ihe Park as indicatetl�n tlie Parks trnpro�.emeM Plan and repair boardwalk. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Vear EriC Funtling Sources: Prior b 2014 6tlmate 2015 Budget 2078 Butlget .Pro act Total _ Fund 32f -UnresMctetl Fund Ba/anca - - --�� - - --- Granfs-Secured(Fed.Slete,Loca� Bmd Proceeds - REET - Other Total Funding Sources: - Capifal Expendttures Design R/gM d Way - Cqnslnittion Total ExpenCiW�as - Forecasted Prgect Cost: Tofal 2011 20'IB 2079 2020 20152020 FunCing Sources: Fuid 321 d/nrestrtctetl Fund Balance 30,000 30,000 GrerRs-Securetl(Fad,Sfefe,Local) - Bmtl Proceeds - - REET Other Total Funtling Sources: 30,000 30,000' Capital ExpanCitures: Daslgn 70,000 10,000 RlgM d Way - ConsfNCllon 20,000 20.000 Tobl ExpentliWres: 30,000 ' 30,000 GraMs/Other Sources 186 Ciry of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) CapRal Facilities Plan Six Year Capi[al Faciikies Plan,20152020 Capital Projects Fund ProjectTitle: Roegne� Park Project No: cpxxxx Projectrype: Non-Capacity ProjectManager Fabef Description: This project will proNde tor trail system mairrtenance,play structure replacemerrt and ri�.erbank stabiliation. Progress Summary• Future Impact on OpereSing Budget: None Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources: PAor ro 2074 Fstlmafe 2075 Budget 2018 Budge[ Pro�eet Tofal FurM 321 -UnreStActeo'Fund Belance GraMs-Securetl(Fed,State,Loca/) Bmd Proceeds REET OfhBr(PRp Levy 2) Tofal FunAing Sources: - Gpifal Expendituras Deslgn Right d Way - �'.OlISfNGfi0I1 Total Expantlilurec Forewstetl Project Cost: Totel 2017 2018 2079 2020 2015-2020 FunAing Sources: Furrd 327 -UnasMcted FurM Ba/ance 50,000 50,000 Giants-Securetl(FeO,Stete,Loca/) _ Bond Proceeds _ REET _ Other(P�op Levy 2) Total FunAing Sources: 50,000 50,000 Gpital Expentliluros: Des/gn 5,000 5,000 R/gM ol Way Construct/on 45,000 45.000 Total ExpendlWrea 50,000 50,000 GrdMs/Other Sou¢es: 187 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUGTION FUND (321) Capkal Faeilkles Plar Sirz Year Capital Factlities Plan,20152020 Capital Projects Fund aro�ect rne: Auburndale Park Project No: CpxxXX ProjectType: Non-Capacity Project Manager. Faber Description: De�elop a Master Plan for ihe Park,Iretall an IrtigaBon system, new play stnichae arid improve sigriage. Progress Summary• Fu;ure Impaet on Operating Budget: UGlities would increase by $5,000 Activity 2074 YE 2015 Vear End FunAing Sources: PFlor_to-2014 EsUmate 2075 BuA et . 2078 Budgat Pro eet Tofal FurM321 -UmeatActadFundBelence � - - - ----"25,OU0� - 25,000 GrerRs-Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) Bwrcl Pioceeds Ofher(Park Impacf Fee) Other(KC Prt�y 2) Total FunCing Sources 25,000 25,000 GPital ExpendiWies: Des7gn 25.000 - 25.000 R/gM d Wey ' ' COIIS�NC�IOl1 Totel ExpendiWres: 25,000 25,000 Foredasted�Piojeot Cost: -- Total 2077 2018 2079 2020 20'I&2020 Funding Sourcea: - -- Funtl3Y1 -UnrasfActetlFulMBalence 25,000 Gisms-securec(Fee,srere,t.ocaq _ _ BaM ProceeUs - Other(Pak ImP�Fee) 250.000 250,000 Ofher(KC Prop 2) 100.000 100 000 Total Funding Souresn: 350.000 375,000 Caplfal FspenElturea Des/gn 25,000 RigM ol Wey - ConStrucNon 350,OD0 350,000 Total Expenditures: 350,000 375,000 GraMs/Other Somces: ' igg City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capftal Faeilkles Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan,20152020 Capkal ProJeets Fund Projea rne: Auburndale Park II Project w: cpxxxx arojectType: Non-Capacity Project Manager. Faber Description: De�.elop a Master Plan in 2015; impro�.e the ebsting trail system arxl install signage and play str�ture. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Increased utilitycosts of $2,000 Actiyity 201d YE 2015 Vear EnA Funtling Sourcec: Prlor ro 2014 E9imate 2015 Bud et 2016 Butlget ProjectSotal Fuirtl321 -UnresMcfed Fund Be/ence 25,000 - 25,000 Grants-Secured(Fetl,Stete,Locaq Bwrd Proceetls REET Other TBD Total FunEing Sources: 25,000 Gpifal ExpentllWres: Design 25.000 25.000 R1gM d Way Construction Total EzpenEitures: 25,000 25,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Toql 2017 2078 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funtling Sources: Funr1327 -UnresHictetl Fund Balance ps,ppp G2rRs-Secured(Fed,Stete,Locaq _ Borrd Proceeds _ REET Other TBD 575,000 575,000 Total Funding Sources: 575,000 gpp,ppp CaPltal EzpenCiwres: Design 75,000 100,000 Rlght ol Wey Construcfion 500.000 W0,000 TOW I ExpanAltures: 575,000 600,000 Grarrts/Other Sou�ces: 189 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capkal Facilkles Plan Siz Yea�Capital Facilkies Plan,20152020 Capital ProJects Fund Projec�rne: SunsetPark Project n�o: Cpxxxx ProjectType: NOn-Cdpacity Project Marvger Fabe� DesCrlption: E�iand playground area to Inolude sp2y,park and additiorel play activities. Cobrclinate improvemerrts will� service club and Lakeland Hills Homeowners Association. ProgFess Surtimary• Future Impact on Opereting Budget: Increase in Utilities of $10,000 per year ActNity� 201d YE 2015 Year Entl Funtling Sourcaa: Prlor b 2014 E9lmafe 2015 Budeet 207B Budget ProJect Total FurM 321 -Unrostncfed Fund Belence GreMs-Securetl(Fetl,Stete,Loceq Bontl Proceatls Perk Impecf Fees 'IS,ODO 785,000 15,000 OtherConMbuNons 8 �oneNons 200,000 Totai Funtling Sources: 75,000 385,000 Gpinl EzpenEi4�res Design 15,000 15.000 Poght d Wey - Cor�3fNCt/an 385.000 To}al Expandituros: 15,000 385,000 Forecasted Projeet Cost: Total 2017 2078 2019 2020 2075-2020 FunOing Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestnctetl Furrtl Balance - Grar#s-Secured(Fed,State,Loca/) - � Bond Procaeds Pailr Impect Fees 200,000 O[her-Cw�tnbut(ons 6 Donffilwu 200.000 Tofal Funtlin9 Sour�es - 4C0,000 Gpinl Expenditures: Design 15,000 Rlght d Wey CorrstrucNon 38S,OOD 7ofa1 Fspentlltures 400;0! Grarrts/Other Sources: 190 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capkal Facilities Plan Sfx Year Capi[al FacilRies Plan,20�5-2020 Capital ProjeetsFund Projeccrne: BPA Trail on Lea Hill Projea No: cpxxxx Projeccrype: Non-Capacity ProjectManager Faber Description: Develop a feasibility study related to constructability of a pedestrian trail Ilnking the Jacobsen Tree Fartn site M tlie west end of Lea Hill. This trail wo�d follow the alignmeM of tlie Borvie�ille Power Administration(BPA)traremission lines from 132nd to 1081h Aeerve SE. Constrvctlon woWd be in phases based on constructability. Progress Summary� Future Irtipact on Opereting Budget: None Activiry: 2074 VE 2075 Year Entl Funding Sources: Prior to 20�4 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2018 BudBet _Project Total FurM 321 LrnesMcted Furrtl Balance _ GreMs-Unsecuretl(State RCOJ - BwM Proceeds - REET _ OfhBr(KC Prtrp. 2)' Total FunAing Sources: - Capipl Expen0lWres: Poedesrc�n _ Deslgn r.WISINC�IpII 7ota1�penAitures - Forecasted Project Cost: Tota I 2017 2078 2019 2020 2075-2020 Funding Sourcas: FurM 32/ -Un2stnctetl Furm'Belance _ Grarrts-Unsecured(State RCO) 750,000 t50.000 BaW ProCBBdS _ REET _ Other(KC Prop. 2)' Total FunCfng Sources: 75U,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Predes/gn 25,000 25,000 Deslgn '125,000 125,000 CO�SINCf/On Tofal Ezpentlltures: 150,000 1$0,000 Grarrts/Other Sowces' 191 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND ($Y'I� Capkal Pacilkies Plan Siu Year_Capital Facillties PWn,20152020 Capkal Projects,Fund Projec�rne: Lakeland Park #4 Project No: cpXXXX aro�ectType: Non-Capacity ProjeccManager. Faber Desc(iption: Complete Master Plan ro include the deeelopmerrt ard construction of an erMrormerrtal commiauty park. Trails,fercing, parkirg and visitor amerutles are included in the proJect. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: tricreased maiMenance wsts of$5,000 Aetivky. 2074 VE 2075 Vear End Funtling Sourcss: PAor b 2014 E�ImaLa 20t5 BuC et 2018 BUCBet Pro eC TOTaI Fund 321 -Unrestncted FurM Balence _ GiaMs-Securad(Fed,Stffie,Local) - Bmtl Pioceetls REET Other TOTdI FunEing Sourcea: CaPltal ExpendiNres Dasign mynr d way ConsINCI(on rorai�pe�aiarea Foreeasted Projeet Cost: Total 2017 2018 2079 2020 2075.2020 Funtling Sourcex Furni 327 -Unrestdcted FurM Belence 25,000 25,000 GrarRs-Secured(Fetl,State,Loca!) Bontl Proceeds REET Other 150 000 150 000 Tobl Funding Sources: 25,000 140,000 775,000 Gpinl ExpenAiturex Deslgn 25,000 25,000 RIgM o( Wey ConslNCflon 1SO,O00 150.000 Tofal EapendiWres 25.000 150.000 17S.00f Grants/Other Sou�ces: 192 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faeili[Ies Plan,20'15-2020 ProjectTne: Fenster Levee Setback, Phase 2B ProjectNo: CP1016 Project7ype: Non-Capacity ProjectManager Ande�sen Deseription: The pmject will design and construct approbmately 800 feet of levee setback along fhe left baMc of the Green RivEr at tlie Citys Fenster Nature Park property.The projeot is interided to irciprove fish habifat and pro�ide refvge for salmonids as well as create additional flood storage capacity during periods of tugher ri�rflow durirg/after storm eveMs and/or when additional wliunes of water a2 released from-Howa�rd Harison Dam.This project will complete floodplain resMration and habitat improvemer�s along an appro�matey riw mile reach of the Green Riv�er tliat begins at Aubum Narrows in unincorporated King Courriy and ends at Fenster Nature Park in Aubum.The City is partnering witti King County arxl the Veteran's Corsenration Corp lo coruWct the project,which is scheduled to be completed in 2015. Progress Summary: Project design has been wmpleted and construction of the project is in progress. Future Impact on Operating Budget: After corutrur,tion,the projectwill need to be moritored and maintained for a minimian of fi� years to ensure tlat the setback le�ee is operating property arid tlia restoration plarfings becbme successiully eshablisheC. Post construction morutoring and maiMenance of the site is accomplished under a separate ebsting program for restoration site monitoring ttet is fimded in the Planning and DevelopmeM Departrnent operations budget. Activity 2014 YE 2015 Vear End Funtling Sources: Prior W 20t4 Estfmate 2015 Butlget 2076 BUCBet Pro ect TOTaI Other(Stam) B00 9,200 25,000 35,000 Othcv(Perks Cap/taf) 160,269 160,269 GraMs-Secured(Fed,Sfafe,Locaq 743,947 826,9'14 970,855 BwM Proceeds Genere/Fund Total Funding Sources: 144,741 996,383 25,000 7,166,724 Capibl Ezpenditures: Design 744,747 638 145,379 Right o/ Way Constmchon 995,745 25,000 t,020,745 Total Expenditures 744,741 998,383 25,000 7,188,124 Forecast�tl Project Cost: Total 2077 2078 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funtling Sources: Other(Storm) 25,000 Ofher(Perks CapitaQ GraMs-Securad(Fed,Stafe,Loce/) BwW Proceads Genera/Fund Total Funding Sources: 25,000 GPital ExpenOitures: Design Right ol Way Construction 25,000 Total 6[penClWres: 25,000 GraMs/Other Sources' SRFB$304,703: PSAR$100,000; KCD$200,000; WRIA 9/KCFD$300,OOP. SRFB $327,000 193 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE PR-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets PARKS, ARTS & RECREATION - MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION P�o ect: 2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 2027 Total 1 PaikAcquiskioris $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ - 2 Issac Evarrs Park - 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 30,000 3 Jaco6sen Tiee Farm - - _ _ _ 4 AubumCanmunityand - 150,000 150,000 150,000 �50,000 150,000 750,000 YoufhTeen CeMer 5 Les Gove Park lmp. - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 8 RotaryParklrriprov. - - - - 7 M(sc Park/mproveiiiants - - - - S CameronPark - - - - - 9 Game Farm Park - - - - 10 Gaines Park - - - _ 77 RoegrrerPark - - - - - 72 Aubyrnda/e Park - 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 73 AuburMaM Park ll - 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,00 14 SunsetPark 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 7 5 BPA Trail Lea Hill - - - - - 76 LakefarMPark#4 - - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 77 FensffirLeveeSefback - - - - TOtal $ • $ 171,000 $ 171,000 $ 783,000 $ 783,000 $ 183,000 $ 891,000 194 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan COMMUNITY AND YOUTHITEEN CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently does not have a Community and Youth/Teen Center Level of Service (LOS) The City does not have a current LOS for a Community Center The proposed LOS of 257.94 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The proposed Community and Youth/Teen Center facility construction project will cost approximately$9,000,000 and the project detail worksheet is presented on page 180. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table PR—3 shows, estimated operating budget impact of$750,000 is forecasted for the Community and Youth/Teen Center Facility during the six years 2016-2021 TABLE PR-4 Facilities Inventory Community and YouthlTeen Center c,a�+aaTv FACILITY Square Feet LOCATION Ewsting Mventory.• None - Total Existing Inventory - Proposed Capacity Projects: New Youth/Teen Center(Remodel) 7,000 New Communiry Center 15.000 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 22,000 2020 Pro ected Invento Total 22,000 195 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan SENIOR CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently has one Senior Center Table PR-5 Facilities Inventory lists the facility along with its current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 168.83 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2014 citywide population of 74,630. The proposed LOS of 147 73 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any senior center capital facilities projects during 2015-2020. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the senior center facility during the six years 2016—2021 TABLE PR-5 Facilities Inventory Senior Center - -- caPacirr FACILITY S uare_Feet . LOCATION__. __ Epsting Irnentay: Senior CeMer 12 600- 808 9th Street SE Total Existirrg Inventay 12,600 Proposed Capaoity Projects: None Tota!Propased Capacity Projects - 2020 Pro ected_Invento Total 72,600 196 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Current Facilities The current inventory of City government administration and operations facilities include 167,896 square feet for general govemment operations, 61,888 square feet for police services, and 31,653 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 261,434 square feet. Tabie GM — 1 `Facilities Inventory" lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 3,503.07 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2014 citywide population of 74,630. The proposed LOS of 3,130.98 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's General Municipal Building facilities include five capital projects at a cost of $1,570,000 and debt service at a cost of $3,967,223 for a total of $5,537,223. The projects include (1) $200,000 for M&O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements, (2) $500,000 for Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay (3) $320,000 for M&O Fuel Tank Replacement (4) $400,000 for M80 Small Equipment and Tool Storage Building, (5) $150,000 for M&O Lunchroom expansion and $3,967,223 for City Hall Annex debt service costs. Table GM — 2 shows the proposed financing plan foliowed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets Operating budget impacts annually are not yet forecast for general municipal buildings during the six years 2016—2021 197 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE GM-1 Facilities Inventory General Municipal Buildings cavacirv FACILITY (Square Feet) LOCATION xisting fn�ntory: Gene2l.Go�mment: CityHall 61,721 25 W Main Street City Hal1 Annex 45,034 1 W Main Street City Maintenance& Operations Facility 17,940 1305 C Street SW nicipal Court(Justice CertfervLeased to King County) 12,200 340 E Main Street ctivity Center 10,074 910 9th Street SE arks & Recreation Admin. Facility 7,804 910 9th Street SE ubum Valley Humane Society-(Leased to AVHS) 5,900 4910 A Street SA Buifding 4,47b 2905 C Street#815 treet Waste Handling Facility 2.750 1305 C Street SW Total 167,893 olice: Gun range 32,880 1800 Block 15th St MN aiiquarters (Justice Center) 24,800 340 E Main Street eized vehicle parkingstalls 3,000 1101 Supermall Way upermall Substation 1.208 C Street SW (GSA) Total 61,888 Fire: Stations: North S[ation#31 12,220 1101 D Street NE GSA Station if35 9,533 2815 C Street SW South Station#32 5,200 1951 R Street SE O[her Facrlities: Nath Station Maint Faciliry 4.700 1101 D Street NE Total 31,653 Total Existing Inventory 261,434 Proposed Capacity Projects: Community 15 D00 Total Propased Capacity Projects 15,000 2020 Projected Inventory Total 276,434 198 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE GM-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 2015 2076 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Caoaekv Proieets: None Non-Caoacitv Proiects: 1 M 8 O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Capital Cos 5 100,000 100,000 - - - 200,000 Funding Sources. Equip.Rental Fund '100.000 100,000 - - - 200,000 2 Equipment ReMaI Vehicle Maintenance Bay Capital Cos 1s 250,000 250,000 - - - 500,000 Funding Sources. Equip.Rental Fund 250,000 250,000 - - 500,000 3 M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Capital Cos ls 70,000 250.000 - 320,000 Funding Sources: Equip. Rental Fund 70,000 250.000 - 320,000 4 M80 Small Equipment and Tool Storage Building Capital Cos Ls 400,000 - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Operating Transfer-Water �00,000 - - - - 100,000 Opereting Transier-Sewer 100,000 - - 100,000 Operating Trensfer-Storm �00,000 - - - - 700,000 Equip.Renml Funtl 100,000 - - - 100,000 5 M80 Lunchroom Expansion Capital Cos ts 'I50,000 - - - �50,000 Funding Sources: Equip. Rental Fund 150,000 - - - - 150,000 6 City Hall Mnex Long-Tertn Debt 659,426 658,527 661,780 662,680 662,680 662,130 3,967,223 Funding Sources. Capital Im prov. Fund - - - _ REET1 659,426 658,527 661,780 662,680 662,680 662,130 3,967;223 Subt�al. Non-Caoacitv Proiects: �Capkal Costs 970,000 600,000 • - • 7,570,000 SUMMARY• CA?IT%1L COSTS Non-CapacityProjects 970,000 600,000 - - - 1,570,000 Long-Term Debt 659,426 658,527 661,760 662,680 662,680 662,130 3,967,223 Total Costs 7,B29,42B 7,258,527 B61,760 862,680 882,880 662,130 5,537,223 RINDING SOURCES: Equip.Rental Fund 670,000 600,000 - - 1,270,000 Operating Transfer -Water 100,000 - - 100,000 Operating Trensfer -Sewer �00,000 - - - �00,000 Operating Transter -SWrtn 100,000 - - - - 100,000 REET1 659,426 658,5_2_7 661,780 662,680 662,680 662,130 3,967,223 Total Funtling 7,629,426 1,258,527 661;780 662,880 662,680 -662,130 5,537,223 199 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) CapMal Faciltties Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds ProjectTitle: M80 Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Project No: Cp0711 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager. Randy Balley Desariptiori: Enclase the 8 e�dsting bays to provide necessary weather protection for street sweepers, vactors, sandirig, and srww pbuv equipmeM. Construct storage shed M facilitate removal of portable corrtainers, improving space util¢ation and traffic flow throughout M&0. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operadng Budget: None Activity – – - — 2U74 YE 2075 Year End Funtling Sourees Prfor Lo 2074 Estlmate 2015 ButlBet 7A78 Budget Projeet Total UnresMcted Equip. Rental Re�enue 5,451 100,000 100,000 105,451 Grants- S9tured(Fed,Stete.Local) Other _ Total Fundfng Sourcea: 5,457 100,000 700,000 105;451 CapHel ExpendfWrex Design RlgM of Wey ConSfNCtion 5.451 700.000 '100,000 105.457 Total ExpendlWres 5,451 - 100,000 100,000 105,651 Forecasted ProJeot Cost: roal 2017 2018 2019 2020 207620E0 Funding Sources: UnresWctedEqulp. Rental Revenue 2U0,000 GiaMs- Secured(Fed,Sfete,Loca/) Other TOfal Funding Souraes: Z00,000 Capital EzpandlWres Design - - Right ol Way - - CWIStNCtbl1 200.000 Toql F�cpenditures: 200,000 G2rrts/Olher Sourcas: 20� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (550) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Ttle: Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay Project No: cp1223 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Randy Bailey Desaription: Build additional vehicle bay at EquipmeM Renfal sMp for heavy equipment and large vehicles to improve etficiency and remove chbke points. Adding a large vehicle liay with a larga vehicle lift will enable us to perfortn inspections and maintenance on more than one large vehicle at a time, this becomes eMremely important during emergency operetions such as snow and ice events. The City curreMy has 2.5 mairrtenance bays, this project will add one more maintenance bay for a total of 3.5 bays. Progress Summary: - Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activ'ity 2014 YE 2075 Year End 2016 Year End Funding Sourcex Prlor Lo 2014 FSGmafe Project Tofal ProJect Tofal UruestnctedEquip. Rerrfal Revenue 29,278 250,000 250,000 279,276 Grants- Securetl(Fetl,Sfafe,LocaQ _ Other Total Funding Sources: 29,276 250,000 250,000 279,278 Capiql F�cpentliturex Design _ Right o/ Way Const�ucfion 29,276 250,000 250,000 _ _279,27fi Tofal Expand(Wres: 29,276 - 250,000 250,000 279,278 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Total 2077 2078 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources: UnrasMctedEqurp. Rerrtal Revenue _ Spp,ppp Grants- Secmed(Fed,Sfafe,LocaQ Other Tofal Fundtng Sources: 500,000 CaPital F�cpenditures: Design Poght of Way Construct/on 500,000 Toql EzpendlWres: 500,000 G2nts /Other Sources: 2�1 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan NAME OF FUND/DEPT Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilitfes Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Ttle: M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Project No: cpxXXX Project Type: Non-Capacity Projea Mana9er Randy Bailey Description: - - Replace our three 10,000 gallon underground tanks with new above ground tanks. Our exisUng fanks were installed in 1989 and they are single wall fiberglass hanks. The Cilys cwrent insurence 6artier will not insure these tanks once they become 25 years old which will occur in 2014. The cily is looldng at other insurance options that may remove this age restricUon. tt will be a benefit to the Ciry ro have tha tanks above ground in the firture due to tlie reduced maintenance and inspectlon cost. Propress Summary: Future Ifnpact on Op`erating Buiiget: � � None Activity• 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl Fdnding Sources Ptlor b 2014 E9imate 2015 BuEget 2016 8utlget Pro ect Total UnrestrlctedEquip. Rental Revenue 70,000 250,000 70,000 GraMs- Secured(Fad,State,Local) - OMer Tofnl Funtling Sources: 70,000 IW,000 70,000 Capitel Expendltures: Des/gn 70,000 70,000 Right o/ WaY ' ConStNtt(on 250.000 Tofal ExpendlWres: - 70,000 250,000 70,000 Foreoasted Project Cost: � � Total 7077 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources UnresMcfedEquip. RerRal Revenue - - 320,000 Grants- Secured(Fed,State,Locaq - - Other Topl Funding Sources - - 320,000 Capitel ExpendlNrex Deslgn 70,000 RigM o( Way ConsWct/on 250,000 Total Ezpenditures: - 320,000 GraMs /Other Sources: 2�2 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan NAME OF FUND/DEPT Capital Facllkles Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Small Equipment and Tool Storage Building ProjCCt No: CpXxXx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Randy Balley Description: Construction of a pertnanent building to replace the 7 aging cargo coniainers.The cargo corMainers were a temporary,ine�ensive storage solution but the space layout is very in�ciert and they are difficult to maintain.The new sVucture would be complete with electrical,plumbing and insulation. W ater, Sewer, Storm and Equipment Rerdal will use this building for storage of small tools anC equipment. Progress Surrimary: This projed will be designed and built in 2015. Future impact on Operating Budget: - None Activity. 2074 YE 20'IS Vear End Funtling Sources: Prior ro 2014 Fstimate 2075 Budget 2076 Butlget ProjectSofal Unresficted Eqmp. Renta/Revenue 100,000 - -� 700,000 Operatirg Transfer-Water 100,000 700,000 Opeiating T2nsfen Sener 100,000 700,000 Operatmg Transferv Stwm t00,000 700,000 Total Funding Sources: 400,000 400,000 Capltal Expenditures: Design _ 171ghf W Way _ r.OlIS12Cr%M }�p,QQ� QQD.QQD 7otal Ezpenditures: 400,000 400,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 207i2020 Funtling Sourcea Unrestdcted Equip. Renfal Revenue 700,000 Oparating Transfer-Water 100,000 Operating Trans/eo-Sev.er 100,000 Operating Transfer-Stam 700,000 Tofal Funding Sources 400,000 Capital F�cpendiWres: Design R'ght o/ Wey Construction 400,000 Tofal Expentlitures: 400,OOD GraMs/Other Souices' 203 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plgn WAME OF FUND/DEPT CaPital FacilRles Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M80 Lunchrbom Expansion Project No: cpxx�c Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Randy Bailejr — --- -- - - - Description: E�ansion of the currerrt lunchroom by redesignirig the area to accommodate PJI-Staff meetings, provide for a lraining facility, lunch room and also senre as the DepartrneM Operations Center (DOC) during an emergency event. In addkion,the design would include siiding doors which would allow the area to serve Mro purposes at once, for e�mple,one half of the room being used as a DOC and the otlier hatf open to employees to use as a lunch/break room. Prog�ess Summary• This project will be designed and buiR in 2015 Future Impact on Opereting Budget: None Activky 2014 YE 2015 Year End FunCing Sourcex Prior to 2014 E4imate 2015 Butlget 2076 8udget Prqect Total Unrestncted Equlp. Rental Revenue 150,000 150,000 GraMs- Secuied(Fed,State,Local) Other Total Funiling Sources: 150.000 150,000 Capital Expendilurex Design 45,000 45,000 Right o/ Way - Consfnictlon 105.000 105,000 Toml EzpendiWres: 150,000 750,000 Forecasted-Project Cost: rotal 2017 2018 2019 2020 201SY020 Funding Sources UnrestnctedEquip. Rental Revenue 150,000 Grar�fs- Secured(Fed,Stete,Local) - Other Tofal Funding Sources: 150,000 CapHal Fspenditures Design 45,000 Riqht ol Way ConstNUion 105 000 Toml Expendiwres: " 750,000 Grarrts /Other Sources: 204 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capita� Faci�ities Plan Six Year Capitai Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Capital Projecfs Fund Project Title: City Hall Annex Projact No: Frojed Type: Project Manager. Descriptlon: To pay scheduled deM service costs on 2010 General Obligation bbnds issued for the Ciry Hall Mnex. Progress Surrimary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity: (PreHous 2 rrs) 2076 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources Prior to 2074 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2076 BuOget Project ToTal UnresMcted Cap lmprow � Grants Secured(Fed,Sfate,Local) REET 1 1,289,400 645,200 659.426 fi58.527 2,594,026 Toml Funtling Sources: 7,289,400 845,Y00 859,428 656,527 2,594,026 Capifel Erzpenditures: Des�gn _ Constniction Long-Term Debf SeMce 1,289.400 645,200 659.426 658,527 2,594,026 Tolal Expenditures: 1,289,400 845,200 659,428 658,527 2,594,026 Foreca_sted Projed Cost: Topl 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 FunEing Sources UnresMcted Cap lmprrne _ G2nfs Securod(Fed,Stafe,Local) _ REET 1 667,780 fi62,680 662,680 662,130 3,967,223 Total Funtling Sources 667,780 662,680 662,fi80 662,130 3,967,223 Capiql Eapentli4�res Deslgn COIIS�NC(IOII _ Long-Temr Debt Sarvice ,661,780 662.680 662,680 662,730 3,967,223 Total ExpendiWres: 661,780 682,680 662,680 662,130 3,967,223 G2M5 /Other Sources: 205 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CIT� OF � � - - �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 206 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Current Facilities Community Improvements include sidewalk and traffic signal improvements, public art and phase 2 of the Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk project. Level of Service (LOS) No Level of Service for community improvement projects have been identified at this time. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City's proposed Community Improvements include thirteen capital projects at a cost of $3,961,188 and debt service at a cost of 1,361,973 for a total of$5,323,161 Table CI-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail. ' Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table CI-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $43,000 are forecasted for community improvement facilities during the six years 2016-2021 207 City ofAuliurn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLBCI-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Caoaeib PrWects: 1 8C�Street NE&C Street NW ITS�Improvements Capital Costs 5,000 - 5,000 Funding Sources Capital Im pro�,em ent Fund - - - - REET 2 5,000 5,000 SubWrtal. CaoaciN Proieets: Capital Cosfs 5,000 - 5,000 Noi�-CatiaciN ProieeSs: 2 plywide Sidewalk Repalrs &Improvemerrts Capihal Cosfs 325,000 325,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 1,750,000 Funding Sources Capifal Im proe2m ent Fund 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 REET2 200,000 200,000 - - - 400,000 Grents (Fed, Siate, Local) 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 �00,000 100,000 600,000 3 Annual Traffe Signa_I Improve_merMs Capital Costs 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 '175,000 175,000 1,050,000 Funiiing Sources Capital Im provem ent Fund - - - - - REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 4 Mohawks Plastics SNe Mitlgatlon Project Capitel Cos4s 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 - 150,000 Funiiing Sources Capital Improvem ent Fund - Other(Fund 124 Trafic Imp.) 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 150,000 REET 2 - - 5 Pu61ic Art Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000, 30,000 30,000 780,000 Funtling Sources Capital Impro�m ent Fund - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 780,000 6 dty Wetland Mitlgation Projeets Capital CosLs 20,790 7,694 7,694 7,694 7,696 51,568 Funding Souroes Capital Improvem ent Fund - - - - - REET t - - - - Other (Fund 124-Wetland Mit.) - 20,790 7,694 7,694 7,694 7,696 51,568 7 Auburn F1Mronmerrtal Park Boardwalk-Phase 2 Capi�al Costs 75,000 800,000 - - 875,000 Funding Sources Capital Impro�nem ent Fund - - - - REET 2 75,000 - - - 75,000 Grants 550,000 - SSO,U00 Other-To Be Determ ined - - 250,000 - - - 250,OOU 8 Downtown WayfinAing Progrem .. . . - - - - - � - - - CapiFal Costs 90,000 30,000 - - - �20,000 Funding Sources Capital Im promem ent Fund - - - - - REET 2 90,000 30,000 - 120,0G 2�8 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE CI-2 (continued) 2015 2016 2077 2018 2019 2020 Tofal Non-Caoackv Proiects: 9 Qeen River Park Design Capihal Costs 75,000 - - - 75,000 Funding Sources: CapihallmprovementFund - - - - - REET 2 75,000 - - - - 75,000 10 LesGove Campus Master Plan Capital Costs 75,000 - - - 75,000 Funding Sources: CapitallmprovementFund - - - - - - REET 2 75,000 - - - - 75,000 11 Main Street Streetscape Urban Design Capital Costs 70,000 - - - - - 70,000 Funding Sources: Loral ReHtalization Fund 70,000 - - - - - 70,000 Granis - - _ _ _ _ 12 City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reco�guration Capifal Costs 159,620 - - - - 159,620 Funding Sources: Local Revitalim4on Fund 159,620 - - - - 159,620 Grants - - - _ _ _ . 13 LocalRevkalaatlon Long Term Debt 222,942 223,091 225,210 224,810 228,610 237,310 1,361,973 Funding Sources: REET2 222,942 223,091 225210 224,810 228,610 237,310 1,361,973 SuMotal,Non-Caoacttv Proiects: Capifal Costs 1,099,620 600,�90 1,157,694 402,694 357,694 337,696 3,956,188 SUMMARY• CAPITAL COSTS CapaciryProjects 5,000 - - - - 5,000 Non-CapaclryProjects 1,099,620 600,790 1157,694 402,694 357,694 337,696 3,956,�88 Long-TeYm Debt 222,942 223,091 225210 224,810 226,610 237,310 1,361,973 Total Costs 1,327,562 623,881 1,362,904 627,504 586,304 575,006 5,323,161- FUNDING SOURCES: CapitallmprovementFund328 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Local Revitalization Fund 330 229,620 - - - - 229,620 Grants 100,000 100,000 650,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 t 150,000 REET2 947,942 658,091 430,210 429,810 433,610 442,310 3,341,973 Other-ToBeDetermined - 250,000 - - 250,000 Other(Fund 124-Traffic Imp.) 25,000 20,000 20,000 65,000 20,000 150,000 Ofher(Fund 124-Wetland Mit.) 20,790 7,694 7,694 7,694 7,696 51,568 Total Funding 1,327,562 823,881 1,382,904 627,504 566,304 575,006 5,323,161 209 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facllities Plan, 20152020 Capital Projects Fund ` ._ .. ..- - -� - ' - Project Title: 8th Street NE and C Street NW RS Improvements TiP # 52 Pioject No: cp1226 ProjectType: CapaCity Pmject Manager� Matt Larson LOS Corrldor ID# 18, 19 Description: This project will expand tfie Citys fTS networic to improve trevel reliability,maintenan6e response,and emergency manag"emerrt capabilities.The project includes tlie design, coorclination,pertnitting,and constr�tion of the ITS e�ansion on the 8th SVeet NE/Lea Hill Road corridor ard at the C Street NWNV Main Street, C Street NW%3rcJ Street NW ard A Street NW/3rd Street NW intersections. Prog�ess Su'mmary: Project is planned to be completed in 2014. Future Impact on Opereting Budget: The amual mairrtenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Activity: 2074 YE 2015 Year EnA Funding So�ries Prlor W 2014 E�imaOe 2015 Butlget 2016 Budgat Project To18i FurM Balence Grants Securetl(FeU,Sfate.LocaQ REET2 50.000 5,000 55,000 Trafflc Impact Fees anB� roai F�oa�n9 so��: w.000 s,000 - ss,000 CaPital Fspentli4�rec Dasign 10,000 - 10.000 Right of way - Constructlon 40.000 5,000 d5,000 Total F�cpendfWres: 50,000 5,000 55,000 Forecasted Project Cost: To�l 2017 2018 1019 1020_ 2015-2020 Funding Soureas Furxl Balance - Grants Secured(Fed,State,Local) REET2 5,000 Trafflc Impact Fees Other Total Fundin9 Sourees: - 5.000 Capital 6cpenditures Deslgn Right of Way - COIISiNCl/0/1 5,�� Totel Ezpenditurea: 5,000 Grants /Other Sources: 21� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,20152020 Capihal Projects Fund ProjectTitle: Citywide Sidewalk Repairs 8 Improvements TIP#32 Project No: cp1301 ProjectType: Non-Capacity(Annual) Project Manager. Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID#N/A Description: Projectfundssidewalkimprovemerrtsatmultiplelocatior�sthroughouttheCity. Asidewalkirrventorywascompletedin 2004 Annual projects are selected based upon criteria such as:gap closure,safe walking routes to schools,completion o dowmown pedestrian cortidor or"linkage",connectivity to transit seMce,ADA requiremerrts, and "Save our SVeets"(SOS project locations. Progress Summary: Puture Impact on Operating Budget. This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street main[enance. Activ'rty: 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prloi W 2014 Estlrriate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget ProJed Toql FurMBalance 25,000 25,000 25,000 Grants-Unsecured State 100,000 100,000 100,000 REET 2 200,000 200,000 200,000 Other Total Funding Sources: 325,D00 325,000 325,000 Capital Expenditures Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 Right o/ Way - Consbuction 310,000 310,000 820,000 Total ExpendiWrex • 325,000 325,000 325,000 Forecasted ProJect Cost: Total 2077 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcez FurMBalance 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Grams-Unsecured State 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 REET 2 - 400,000 O[her Tofal Funtling Sources 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 1,150,000 Caplpl Expenditures: Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 90,000 RigM oi Way Construction 110,000 170,000__ 110,000 110,000 1,060,000 Total ErzpendlWres: 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 1,150,000 Granls/Other Sources: Grent funds are na secure - �- 211 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Paeilitles Plan Six Year Capital Facilifies Plan, 20752020 C.apital ProJects Fund Project Title: Mnual Traffic Signal Replacement 8 Improvements T1P #34 Project No: Various Project Type: Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager. TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A DescripUon: This project includes replacing traffic signal cabinets and equipmeM, video detection cameras and pedestrian pushbuttons. This project will also make safety improvements to our signals including awdliary heads and flashirg yellow arrows, or capacity improvemer�ts such as righ[-tum owdap signals. The City uses current trafiic courds and collision data to detertnine the iMersections to improve. Progress Summary• The project is ongoing and corAiriues to successtully corriplete annual traffic sigrel irtiprovement projects cityuvide. Future Impact on OperaNng Budget: This project will have ra impact on the operating budget for street maiMeronce. ACtIVI�/• 2014 YE 2075 Year Entl Funding Sources Prlor to 2014 Estlmate 2D15 Budget 2078 Budget ProJee!Totel Fund Balance - - GraMs Unsecured(Fed,State,Lacaq - - REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 Other Total Funding Sources 775,000 - - --175,000 175,000- 350,000 Capital ExpendfWres Deslgn - 25,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 RigM o/ Way - Construction - 150.000 150.000 150,000 300,000 Total ExpendiWres - 175,000 775,0� 775,000 350,000 Forewsted Projed Cost: Totai 2077 2018 Z079 2020 20152020 Funding Sources Fund Ba/axe - - - G/ents-Unsecu2d(Fed,State,Local) - - REET 2 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 Other Total FurMing Sourcex 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 1,050,000 Capltel EicpentliWres: Design 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Right oi Way Conshuction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Total Eic{iendiWrex 175,000 175,000 175,000 175,000 7;050;OD0 GraMs/Olher Sw�ces: 212 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capltal Facilities Plan Six Year Capifal Facflitles Plan,2015-2020 Capital ProJeeffi Fund ProjectTiUe: Mohawks Plastics Site Mklgation Project TIP #13 Project No: cp0767 ProjectType: Non-Capacky Project Manager JefF D&on/Matt Larson LOS Corridor IDII N/A Description: The project consists of the design,corstruction,mairrtenance antl morritoring of appro�dmately 22ac2s of wetland c2adon and appro�dmatey 0.4acres of wetland enhancemerK witFrin the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sewer Utility in orcJerto compensate for approbmately�.6ac2 weBand loss on the Mohawk PlasUcs prbperty(Parcel# '132'1049056). The project wds appro�ed �er an ebsting ag2emerrt approsed by Resolution No. 4196,June 2007 Progress Summary: Ttie Ciry recei�d the DOE WQ Certification, WDFW HPA,and on May 7 2009,the Arrny Corps of Engineers(Corps)404 wetland pertnit(NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid speciflcatiorts arcl construction plans were prepared and corutrucGon began in October 2009. Coretruction�ras completed in January 20�0 and the project is currentlywithin the 10- year monitoring period,which irnolres amual mairrtenance,moritoring ard reporting. Future Impact on Ope�ating Budget: tt is ar�ticipated Mat armual mairrtenance,morutoring and reporting on tlie performance of the weflarul mitigation project will be requred tor a period of 10 years,in corRortnance with pertnit req�oremeMs. Afterthe successfid conclusion of 1N5 10- year monitoring period,which is arrticipated to be in December 20'19,ongoing operetion e�enses shoWd be mirdmal. Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Vear EnA FunAing Sources Prior b 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2076 Budget Project Total Furrd Ba/ence _ Grants Sacuretl(Fetl,Stete,LocaQ Bontl Proceeds Tref/ic Impact Fees 469,855 25,000 25,000 20,000 519,855 REET 2 76.368 76 368 Toql FunAing Soureea 546,223 25,000 25,000 20,000 596,223 Capipl ErzPenOib�res Des�gn 770.706 170,706 Rlght d Wey Consfructiw 375,517 25.000 25.OD0 20,000 425,5'17 Tobl Expentlitures: 548,223 25.000 25,000 20,000 598,223 Forecas;ed Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2078 2019 2020 2015•2020 Funding Sources: Fund Be/ance Grants Sec�red(FeU,State,Loce!) Bond Proceeds Treflic Impecf Fees 20,000 65,000 20.000 150,OOp REET2 Tolal Funding Sources: 20,000 65,000 20,000 150,000 GpiGl Expenditures Design Rlght o/ Way Construction 20,000 65,000 20,000 150,000 Topl ExpendiNres: 20,000 85,000 20.000 750,000 G2Mb/Other Somces: I 213 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plgn CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capipl Faciuties Plan Six Year Cap'rtal Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Capifal Projects Fund Project Title: Public /Ut Project No: gCbd02 Project Type: Projed Manager• Krueger Description: - - The City desigretes$30,000 armuallytovrard the purcha�se of p�lic art, for placemeM at designated locatiore throughou[ the City. Progress Summary: Arts Commission will meet to assess futwe needs and seek approval from City Coimcil on placemerrt. Pulure Impact on Operating"Budgeti None Activily - - - - - - - 2074 YE 2015 Vear End Funtling Sources: Prlor_to20t4 Fstlmate 2015 Butlget-_2018 Butlget Bro�ectSodl_ Fund Belence � - � 22,000 - - - - �- - 22,000 GraMs Secuied(Fed,Sfete,Locel) - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 90,000 ONrer Total Funtling Sourcas 30,000 52,000 30,000 30,000 112.000 CaplLl ExpandiNres Design - RiryM d Wey - ConstrucNon 30,000 52,OOD 30.000 30.000 742.000 ToTal E:pantliWrec 70.000 52,000" 30,000 - 30,000 " 112.000" Forecasted ProJeot Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2018 2020 201b2020 FunEing Sources: Funtl Belence - Grarrts Secured(Fed,Stete,Local) - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Other Total Funding Sourcex �0,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180.000 Capltal Expandituros Design Rlghf ol Way Constn�ction 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Total F�cpenillturas: 30,000 30,000 50,000 30,000 180,000 Grants/Other Sources: 214 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Faeilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan,20'IS-2020 Capkal Projeets Funtl Projectrne: City Wetland Mitigation Projects ProjectNo: cp1315 ProjectTN,e: Non-Capacity ProjectManager Afld@f5@fl Description: This project desigre and constructs off-site wetland mitigation in the Aubum Ern�ironmental Park for participating de�elopment projects as approved ihrough the Citys developmerR review process. Design,construction, monitorirg, and mairRenanoe of the mitigation is funded ttirough wetland mitigation fees collected by tlie City. Progress Summary� Construction and monitoring are on9oing. Future Impact on Operating Budget: After construction, each wetland mitigation site is monitored and mairrtained for a period of ttiree to ten years,depending on the specific requiremerris for the project.Fintling for Tulure.year monitoring and maintenance is included in ihe dewlopmerrt fees collected by ihe City,and is budgeted as part of tlie Capital Facilities Pian. Activity. 2074 YE 2015 Year Entl Puntling Sources: Prior ro 2014 EstlmaOe 2015 Budget _2016 Butlget ProJect7otal Funtl Ba/ance - - — Grants Securetl(Fed,State,Local) _ FurM 124 WeNand AAltigaGon Accounf 4,355 20,790 25.145 REET Total FunAing Sources: 4,355 20,790 25,145 Capitll Expenditures: Desi9� 4,000 4.000 Righf ol WaY 72,090 12.090 CorrstmcLon 4,355 4,700 4,700 TOUI E�cpendilures 4,355 20,790 20,790 Forecasted Project Cost: Tobl 2017 2078__ 2019 2020 20152020 Funtling Sources: - - - Fu�Balance Gran7s Secured(FeU,Stete,Local) Funtl tt4 Wet/and fvA'tigation Accounf 7,694 7,694 7,694 7,696 5'1,568 REET Tobl Funding Sources: 7,894 7,694 7,694 7,696 51,568 Capibl Expendltures: Design 4.000 Right W WaY 72.090 Construction 7,694 7,694 7,694 7,696 30,778 Tobl Expenditures: 7.694 7.694 7.684 7.696 57,568 Grants/Other Sources 215 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) CapiNal Facillties Plan Six Year Capihal FacilRies Plan, 20752020 Capiql Projects_Fund Project Title: Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk - Phase 2 Project No: cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capaaity Project Manager Mdersen Description: The Aubum Ernironmental Park (PEP) provides vegetated naturel open space within an urban¢ed area. The AEP provides opportuntties for local economic development,water quality improvemeM,stortn water detention,flood control, fish and wildlife enhancemeM,visual resources, public education,and passive recreation, including waliting Vails and bird viewing amenities. In 2012, the Ciry completeH ihe coristruction of approximately 1,200 lineal feet of tlia first phase (Phase 1)of an elevated tioardwalk trail in the Fwbum Environmental Park (AEP). This Vail eMended from W est A�6in Street through e�dsting wetlands in the AEP tertninating at the base of the Bird vewing Tower coristructed in 2009. As pert of the cohsVuation of the elevated boardwalk,the City also instatied iMerpretative signage,b�ch seating,limited new vehicle parking on Western Avenue and over lwo acres of wetland species of traes, plarrts and sHrubs. Phase 2 of the elevated boartltivzlk trail would construct a combinatibn of appropmately 2,000 lineal feet of surtace trall and elevated boardwalk trail from the current tertninus at the Bird �liewing Tower to a connection wiN the Interurban Trail. The Phase 2 project will TuMer previous and current Councils'visions of the AEP providing assive recreation and environmental educatlon unkies for all Fwbum citizens. Progress Summary• This is a new capital improvement proposal. Future Impaot on Operating Builget: ConsVuction of the Phasa 2 project is anticipated to incur approbmately$�0,000 in annual operating�wsts to the Citys operating budget. This operating cost is covered in ewsting program improvemerrt fundirg for the Environmental Services portion of the Commun' Develo mertand Public Works De rtmentbud et. Activity. Y014 YE 2015 Year End Funtling Sources Prior tn 2014 Esbmate 2015 ButlBet T016 Butlget Project 7otnl Fund Ba/arice Granfs Unsecurod State REET 2 75,000 - 75,000 Other -TBD Total Funding Sources: 75;000 - 75,000 Capitsl Ex{iendittires: Oes/gn 75,000 75,000 Right W Way - COIISfNC110O Total Eupenditures 75,000 � _ " - -" 75,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2079 2020 2015-2020 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - Grents Unsecuiad State 550,000 550,000 REET 2 75,000 Other -TBD 2W,000 _ 250,000 Total Funtling Sources: 800,000 875,000 Capifal F�cpentlitures: Deslgn 75,000 Right W Way - Construction 800,000 800.000 Total Erzpenditurex 800,000 - 875,000 G2Ms /Othar Souroas: 216 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPffAL IMPROVEMEM' FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Capital Projects Pund Project Title: Downtown Wayflnding Program Project No: Gpxxxx Projact Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain Description: Phase 1: The dowrrta.vn PedesVian Kiosks were developed in 2012 as a result of additional funding being available ihrough Local Revitalization Financing. Nlne locations were selected within Downtown Aubum for a pedesVian Iti�k M be constructed. Witli the budget available,three luosks were consVucted in 2013 at the Interurban Trail, Sound Trensit Plaza, antl at 1st StreeUSouth Division Street Phase 1 proposes consWction W three atldiGonai Idosks m 2015. Phase 2: Develop an updated wayfinding program,both pedestrian ar�d vehicular that would initially begm within DavMown Aubu that could then be e�anded Citywide. The current vehicular wayfind'mg program is lacking in aesthetic appeal, dces not coordinat with the vision tor powrrtown Alibum, and needs refreshing. A design and color scheme have been established with the pedesVia kiosk design that an updated wa�nding progrem can build upon. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity• 2074 YE 2015 Yeer End Funding Sour�es: Prlor ro 2014 Estimate 2075 Butlget 2076 Bud et Pro ect Total Fund Ba/ance REET 2 90,000 30,000 90,000 Ofher Total Funding Sourcea: - 90,000 30,000 30,000 CaPiml Expendlwres Design 8,000 15,000 8,000 Right of Way Constructlon 82.000 15.000 82.000 Toml ExpenAiwres: - " 90,000 30,OU0 90,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcex � Fund Balance REET 2 �2p,ppp Other 7otal Punding Sources: 120,000 Capifal F�cpenditurex Desl9� 23.000 Rlght ol Way - Constructlon 97,000 Total ExpendiWres: 120,000 Grsrns /Other Souroes: 21� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faeflitles Plan, 2015-2020 Capital Projects Fund Project rne: Green River Park Design Project No: CpxxicX Project Type: Non-Capacity Project rvtanager. Daryl Faber Description: This project provides funding ro complete of a Green River Park Master Plan. The Ciry has receMy received, via a property transfer from King Courrty and the State of W ashington, the riverfrorrt property located alorig a bend in the Green River tietween 102nd and 104th Ave SE. These two parcels comprise an approximate 14 acre sde, intended to be developed for public use. This future park coMinues more than 1,000 feet of water access. Much of the property is subject to shoreline regulatiorrs as well as other restrictions. Community input is vital to the long-term vision and success of the property. Piogress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: No impact on the Parks Departmerrt Operating Budget. The Citys funding of a Park Master Plan for this sRe is critical in an effort to receive graM funding and can be a reimbursable expense should funding be allocffied for construction for the proposed park site. Activity• (Prallous 2 Yrs) 2074 YE 2075 Yee�End Funding Sources: Prior to 2074 Estimafe 2075 Budget 2018 Butlget Pra ed Tofal UnresMcted Cap Impro�s - - - GraMs-Secured(Fed,Stafe,Local) - - REET 2 75,000 75 000 Tofal Funding Sourees: - 75,000 - 75,000 Capital FxpendlWres: Design - 75,000 - 75,000 CO/IS�NCGM - - - - LO/1¢T8/II/Q96�$BlVICB - Tofal Expendltures: - - 75,000 - 75,000 Forecasted Projed Cost: Tofel 2077 2018 2079 20�1 20752020 Funding Sourees Unrestnctetl Cap Improve - - Grants - - REET2 75000 Totai Punding Sourcex - - - 75,000 Capital ExpendiWrex Design 75,000 Constn,ction - - Long-Term Debt Servlce Total ExpendiWres: - - 75,000 GraMs/Other Sou�ces: " - - 218 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Capital_Projects Fund Project Title: Les Gove Campus Master Plan Projed No: CpxXxX Projea Type: Non-Capacity Project Mareger. Daryl Faber Description: This project provides the funding to complete a Les Gove Campus Master Plan made necessary by the recent acquisRion of the Herr Properties and the proposed construction of the Community and Youth/Teen Center This plan will consider recreational opportundies; potential community uses;h�c pattems aFFectirg the Les Gove neighborhood; park user pedesfian, antl vehicular safety. The plan will also e�mine poterdial Ciry uses and opGons such as demolition or repurposing of property. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Opereting Budget: This project will have rro impact on the opereting builget for Parks and Recreation, but will make the City eligible for graM funding. Activity (PreHous 2 Yrs) 2016 YE 2015 Year Entl Funding Sources: Prlor b 4014 Fsdmate 2015 Budget 2076 Builget .ProJact Tofal UnresMcted Cap Improve Grants Secured(Fed,Stete,Locaf) REET 2 75,000 75,000 Tofal Funding Sources 75,000 75,000 Capliel F�cpenditures Deslgn 75,000 75,000 Construction Laig-7ertn Debt SeMce Toml ExpenClturoa: 75,000 75,000 Forecasted Projed Cost: roa� 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sourcas: - Unrc+stdcted Cap Impiove _ G2nts _ REET 2 75,ppp 7otal Funding Sources: - - 75,000 Capital Expenditures Des/8� 75.000 �'.OIISINL(hM _ Lorg-Term Debf Service Total Expendiwres: 75,000 G2nts /Olher Sources: 219 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330) Capital Facilitfes Plan Six Year Capifal Facilkies Plan, 20152020 Capital Projecffi Fund Project Tue: Main Street Streetscape Urban Design Project No: cpxxxx aroject Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain DescMption: Develop an iuban design conceptto( Main Street fmm C SVeet NW/SW to F Street NE/SE. The design woWd primarily lobk at the sVeet ernironmerrt of Main SVeet and Faw the ebsting buildings will irrterface with the street. The project will also bok at geotechrrical analysis of the soil conditions within ihe Main Street rigM-of-way as weli as preliminary design of idilities in order to develop a cost estimate for a fuhae construc6on project. Construction is rot part of this pmject. a is armcipated ihat fuhae budget or grard tunding will be sougM for the detailed design and construction phases. Progress Summary• ConsultaM selection is underway. AMicipate beginrrirg the urban design work in 2014 arid cortipleting tfris pFiase in 2015. Future Impact on Opereting Budget: None aMicipated. /�CYIVIf)/. 2014 YE 2075 Year End Fundfng Sourcea: Prior ro 201d Estlmate 2075 Butlget 2016 Budget Proect Total Lxal ReNtal/zation Fund 330 170,000 10,000 180,000 Granfs- Secured(Fed,State,Locel) Ofher /GO Ba�d) Totel FunCing Sourcas 110,000 70.000 - 780,000 Capltal Expentlltirea Deslgn 110,000 70,000 180,000 Righf W Wey - COIIS�NC�IOl1 Totel �pendiWres: 110,000 � 70,000-�- - "" - _ - - 180,000" Forecasted ProJect Cost: rom� 2017 2078 2019 2020 2075-2020. Funding Sourees Loca/ Revttadzallon Fund 330 - 70,000 Grants- Secured(Fed Stete,Locaf) - - Other (GO Bond) - - Total Funding Sour�es: 7�.a� Capltal EzpendlWres: Deslgn 70,000 Right ol Way CO�S�NCtlpl ' Topl Expendlturea - - � � - � � —�70.000 Grants /Olhw Sources: 22� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330) Capital Facilltles Plan Six Year Capifal Facilfties Plan, 20152020 Capifal Projects Fund Project rtie: City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration Projea No: cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain Description: Reconfigure the City owned public parkirg bt between Safeway and Main SVeet to address pedestri.an ard vehicular circulation;remove epstirg landscaping to allow more flepbility in the parking lot redesign;e�lore whether more paricing sta�ls can be added to the lot to aid in providing additlonal customer parking within Downtown Aubum;and resurface the parking lot. Progress Summary: Begin design in 2014 with construcfion potentially startirg towards the end of 2014 and completion in 2015. FuWre�Impaat dn Opereting Budget: None anticipated as the Cily already mairrtains the parking lot. Activity. 2074 YE 2p15 Year EnC FunCing Sourms: Prlor to 2074 Estimate 2075 Budeet 2016 Butlget Project Total _ Loca/RaNtellzet/on Fund 330 220,000 759,620 379,620 Grants-Secured(Fred,Sfete,Loce!) REET Othe�(GO Bontls) Total Funding Sources 220,000 159,620 379,620 CaPitel ExpendiWres: Design 725.867 t25.867 R79M d Way 94,133 759,620 253,753 r.0I15INC�lOI1 Total Expendltures 220.000 159,620 379,620 Foreoasted Project Cost: rotal 2017 ZO78 2019 2020 20152020 FunEing Sourcas: Loca/Rev/tellzat/on Funtl330 159,620 c�a.ns-securea(Fee,srere,cocap REET _ O�har(GO Bartls) Total Funding Sources 159.620 Gpital EzpenEliurec Design RigM o/ Way 159,620 C.OlISfNC�IOII Tobl ExpentliWres: 159.620 Grants/Other Soutces: 221 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328) Ca{iital FaeilitiesPlan Six Year Capital Facilitles Plan, 2015-2020 Capital ProJects Fund Project Title: Local Revitalization Project No: Project Type: Project Manager Desc�Iption: To pay debt service costs on 2010 General Obligadon bonds issued for Cie Dowrrtown P�enade trnpro�merrts. Loaal Revitalizatlon financfng is a oredit on the State's poNon M sales ta�c that the City will receive through 2035. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity - -- (PreNous 2 Vrs) 2076 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sourcea Prlor to 2014 FSimate 2075_BuE et_ 2016.Bud8aL — BroJacl 7otal Urnestdcted CeP /mProw - -__-__ - _ _.__ _-__ - _ _ _ G2M5 Secuied(Fed,State,Local) REET 2 299.132 217.100 222,942 223,091 739.174 Total Funding Sourees 299,1ffi 217,100 rt2.942 723,091 739.174 Capllal ExPandiWres Design Constructiar LonB'Term Debt Service 299.132 217.100 222,942 223.091 739.174 Total F�cpendiNros: 289,132 277,100 u3,942 223.091 739.174 Forecasted ProJect Cost: � Tofe I 2077 2018 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sour�es: Uruestr/cted Cap Improva - - Grarrts - REET 2 225.210 224.810 228,610 237,310 1,361,973 Total Funding Sourcax 225,210 71A,670 t28,670 237,310 1,361.973 Capital ExpendlWies Design Construction - - - Lorg-Term Debt SeMce 225,210 224,810 228,810 237,310 1,361,973 Total ExpendlWies: Y25,210 224,870 218.810 237,710 1,361.973� Grams I Other Sources:- 222 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE CI-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Pro'ect: 2016 2077 2078 2019 2020 2021 Total 1 Sth Sf NE 8 C Si NW!TS Improvements $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 500 $ 3,000 2 Citywide Sidewalk Repair 8 ImprovemeM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 Tra�c Signallmprovements _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation - - - - - - - 5 PuWic Art 6 CityWetlandMitigation Projects - - - - - - - 7 AEPBoardwalk-Phase2 _ - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 8 DowntownWa�nding _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 9 G�een Rive�Paik Design _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 10 Les Gove Campus Master Plan - - - - - - - 11 Main SL Streetscape Urban Design - - - - - - - 12 CityDowntownPubNc ParkingLoiReconfiguration - - - - - - - 13 Local Revkalization - - _ _ _ _ _ ' Total $ 500 $ 500 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 $ 10,500 $ 43,000 223 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � * �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 224 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT Current Facilities The City of Aubum operates the Auburn Municipal Airport, providing hangar and tie-down facilities/leasing space for aircraft-related businesses. As of 2010, there were approximately 141,000 take-offs and landings (aircraft operations) at the airport annually Table A-1 "Facilities Inventory' lists the facilities with current capacity and location. Currently the Airport is in the process of updating the Master Plan which will be completed in 2014. Level of Service (LOS) The Auburn Municipal Airport Master Plan Update 2001-2020 provides a maximum runway capacity (LOS standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annuaily; one take-off or landing equals one aircraft operation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA requires the airport to have the capital facilities capacity (i.e., runways, taxiways, holding areas, terminal, hangars, water/sewer system, etc.) necessary to accommodate 100% of aircraft operations during any one year By 2020 the Airport Master Plan foreqsts the number of operations to be 193,189 —well below the capacity of the airport runway Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The Citys Airport facilities include thirteen non-capacity capital projects at a cost of $ 3,893,170. These projects include the South T-Hangar Row 3 enclosure, runway extension project and land acquisition for future approaches. Table A-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating expense budget impacts forecast for the airport during the six years 2016 — 2021 The South T-Hangar Row 3 enclosure project is anticipated to increase the hangar rental revenue by approximately$60,000 per year beginning in 2016. TABLE A-7 Facilities Inventory Airport cnancirr FACIL�7Y #ofAiroreft #ofFeet LOCATION Existing Inwntory: Hangars 145 400 23M Street NE Tiedov.ns 214 400 23rd Street NE irStrfp 3400 40023rdStreetNE Total Existing Inventay 359 3,400 Propased Capacity Projects: 2020 Land Aoquisitiar 30 400 23rd Street NE 2017RunHeyExtension 718 40023rdStreeWE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 30 718 2020ProjectedlnventoryToWl 389 4,118 225 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Fgcilities Plan TABLE A-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING AIRPORT 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total Caoacitv Praects: - - - - -- - - --- - Nare - Non-Caoaciri Profects: 1 Airport Security Camera &Gate Access Upgrades Capital Cos ts - - - - - 70,000 70,000 Funding Sources Airport Fund - - - - - 3,500 3,500 Grant - - - - _66,500 . - _ 66,500_ 2 Sou[h T- Hangar Row 3 Enclosure Capital Costs 347,000 - - - - - 347,000 Funding Sources Airport Fund 347,000 - - - - - 347,000 Grant - - - - - - 3 Obstruction Survey for NezGen/f.�S Approach Capital Cos ts 210,000 - - - - - 210,OOU Funding Sources Pirport Fund 10,500 - - - - - 10,500 Grant 199,500 - - - - - 198,500 4 Land AcqufsitlonforFuture Approaches Capital Cos fs - - 420,000 - - - 420,000 Funding Sources flirport Fund - - 21,000 - - - 21,000 Grants - - 399,000 - - - 399.000 5 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Gapital Costs 16,125 - - - - - 16,125 Funding Sources Airport Fund 806 - - - - 806 Grants 15,319 - 15,319 6 Rurnvay Eictension Capital CosS 161,000 140,000 1,064,000 - - - 1,365,000 Funding Sources Airport Fund 8,050 7,000 53200 - - - 68,25b Grants 152,950 133,000 1,010,800 - - - 1,296,750 7 Automated Weather Observation System Capital Cos ts - - - - 268,800 - 268,800 Funding Sources Airport Fund - - - - 13,440 - 13,440 Grants - - - 255,360 _ _ - 255,360_ B Fuel Farm Capital Costs - - 140,000 - - - 140,000 Funding Sources Airport Fund - - 140,000 - - - 140,000 Grants - - - - - - - 226 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 2015 2016 2077 2018 2019 2020 Total Non-Capacitv Proiects: 9 Land Acquisition Capital Costs - - - - - 735,205 735,205 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - - 36,760 38,760 Grants - - - - - 698,445 698,445 10 Precision Approach Path Indicatw (PAPI)for Runway Capital Costs - - - - - 168,000 168,000 Funding Sources: AirpoR Fund - - - - - 8,400 8,400 I Grants - - - - - 159,600 159,600 11 West Side Fencing Capital Costs - - - - 52,920 - 52,920 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - 2,646 - 2,648 Grants - - - - 50,274 - 50,274 12 General Repair&Maintenance Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - - 13 Taxiway Seal Coat 8 Restripe Capital Costs - - - - - 50,120 50,720 Funding Sources. Airport Fund - - - - - 2,506 2,506 Grants - - - - - 47,614 47,814 SUMMARY� CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - _ _ _ Non-Capacity Projects 784,125 140,000 1,624,000. - 321,720 1,023,325 3,893,170 Total Costs 784,125 140,000 1,624,000 - 321,720 1,023,325 3,893,170 RJNDING SOURCES: Airport Fund 416,356 7,000 214,200 - 16,086 51 166 704,808 Grants (Fed,State,Local) 367,769 133,000 1,409,800 - 305,634 972,159 3,188;362 Total Funding 784,125 140,000 1,824,000 - 327,720 1,023,325 3,893,770 227 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capipl Facllkles PWn 5ix Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project rue: Airport Security Camera 8� Gate Access Upgrades Project No: cp"''' Projecc Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager� Shelley Coleman Description: 6icreased seau�ity iderrtified by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Transportation Security Admirilstration fur Airport control access gates (both vehiGe and personnel). This projec[ will iretall seauitycameresand rep�ace the obsoletegffie operatoraccess contrrol urvis. The proposed system will include cards and keypad operationwith both inbound arxl outbound lracking of tha authorized tenant/guest. Personnel gates will also tiave the same system. Progress Surtimary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity - - - - ---- 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sourcec PAor Lo 2014 E9lmate T015 Butlget 2018 Budget ProJeet Total UnrasMcted Ai�pwt Revenue - - Federa/ Grant Secured - - State Grant Secured Tofal FunHing Sources: - - CePHeI Ezpenditurex Deslgn - R/ght ol Way - - C.O/iSllUC�lO/1 Total ExpendlWres - - - Foredasted ProJeot Cost: Tota I 2077 2018 2019 2020 2015-2020 Funding Souresa UnresMctedAirypt Revenue 3.500 3,500 Federal Grarrt -Secu�ed 63,000 83,000 State Granf Secured 3.500. - 3 500 Total Funding Sources - 70,000 70,000 , Capital ExpanAiWrox Deslqn Right ol Way ConStNCIlon 70.000 70.000 Total ExpendlWrea 70,000 70,000 GrarR /Other Sources: Fede21 ANatlon Adminis[ratian 22g City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capiql Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Punds Projea Titie: South T- Hangar Row 3 Enclosure Project No: cp1408 Project rype: Non-Capacity Project Manager TBD Description: The airport currently has vacant open T-Haiigars,but the airport has 100% occupancy on closed T-Hangars inclutling a wait list for closed T-Hangars. This projeci proposes seventeen open T-hangars be upgreded to closed T-hangars. Progress Summary• Design and engineering was completed in 2014 and constructionwill begin in 2015. Futu�re Im{iact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to increase hangar rental revenue by approximataly$60,000 per year beginning in 2016. Activity - 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prfor b 2014 ESNmate 2015 Butlget 2016 Budget Prqecl Tofal UnrestnctedAirporf Revenue 10,000 347.000 - - -- "357,000 Grents (Fatl,State,Local) Other Tofal Funding Sources: 10,000 347,000 357,000 Capipl Fxpenditures: Design 10.000 10,000 Poght of Way Constructlwr 347,000 34T,000 Toql Expenditures: 10,000 347,000 357,000 Forecasted Project Cost: 7ota1 2017 ZO18 2079 2020 2015-2020_ . Fundin9 Sources: UnrestncfedAirpwt Revenue 347,000 Giants (Fred,State,LocaQ Other Toml Funding Sources 347,000 Capiql Erzpenditures: Design Right ol Way Construction 347,000 Total Expenditures: 367,000 G2rris /Other Sources: 229 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capifal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project rtie: ObsVuction Survey for NexGen/GPS Approach Project No: Cp'"'* Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Description: Digital ObsVuction Survey to lower landirg minimums,provide more efficient approach procetlu�e and remove riighNcircle restriotion on ebstirig approach. Progress Summary• Fulure Impact on Operating Budget: Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Pdor to 2014 .FstimaM_ .._2015_Budget_ _ 2018 Budget Projecl Total Un�estActed Airppt Revenue 10,500 10,500 Federel Grant -Securod 189,000 189.OU0 State Grent -Secured 10 500 10 500 Total FunAing Sourees 210,000 210,000 Capiml ExpendiNres: Design 210,000 210.000 Po'gAt o/ WaY ' CORSINC�IOO romi ExPendiwres: z�o,000 z�o,000 Fore.casteil Project Cost: Total 2017 2078 2018 2020 20152020 Funding Sources: UniasMctedAlrpdt Revenue - 10,500 Fede21 GraM Securad - 189.000 State Grant Securad 10,500 Tofal Funding Sources: - - 210,000 Capifal Expenditures: Design 210,000 Right ol Way - COl�SfNC[i0/I Total ExpendiWres: 210,000 Grarrt /Other Sources' � 230 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015•2020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Land Acquisition for Future Approaches Project No: Cp""""` Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Description: Acquire lard at the ciareM Park and Ride for future approaches. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity: 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources Prior to 2014 Estimate 2075 Budget 2U76 Budget Projeet Total UnrestnctedAirport Revenue Fede21 G2nt -Unsecured Stafe Grdnt -Unsecured Total Funding Sources - CaPitel Expenditures: Design - Acquisition - Constmction Tobi 6cpendiwres: Forecasted Project Cost: rotal Y017 2078 2019 2020 2015-2020 FunAing Sources Unres[ActedAirport Revenue 21,000 - - 21,000 Fede21 Grant -Unsecumd 378,000 378,000 State Grant -Unsecured 21,000 21,000 7otal Funding Sourcex � 420,000 420,000 Capifal Erzpenditures Design Acquisttion 420,000 420,000 ConsWction To�al ExpendiWres: 420,000 420,000 GraM /Other Sources: 231 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capifal Facilkies Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Tue: Wildlife Hazaril Assessment Project No: cp1321 Projea Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Description: - " "" Federel Aviation Administration mandated wildfre haard assessmerrtfor high wlume airports. Progress Summary• Mead & Hurrt began the Wildlife Assessmentsurvey on December2013. Surveys are conducted mordhlyuntil December 2014; and a report will tie issued diaing 1st quarter 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity: � - � - �- - 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prfor to 2014 Estimate 2015 Budget 2018 Budget ProJect Total UnresthctedAirywt Revenue 476 2,218 806 3,500 Federal Grant -Secured 8,562 39,925 14,513 - 63,000 Sfate Grdnt -Secured 476 2,278 806 3,500 Totei Pu�Ming Soure¢s: 9,514 4t,367 ' 16,125 -" � - - "70,000 Capltal Expenditures Des/gn 9,514 44,361 16,125 70,000 R�ght o/ Way COIISINCtIOIi Toml Ezpenditures: 9,514 "-44,367- � --" 18,125 - - - - 70,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Totnl 2017 2018 2019 2020 201&2020 Funtling Sources: UnresMcied Airyort Revenue - - 806 Fetleral Grant -Secured - 74,513 Stafe Grem Secured 806 Total Ftinding Sources: - 16,725 Capiql Expenditures Deslgn 76,725 Righf of Way - CO(ISINC�lO(1 Total Expentlitures: 16,125 Grarrts /O[her Sources: Federal AHffiion Administration and Washington State DeDartment of Transportation 232 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2U20 Enterprise Funds Project Ttle: Runway Extension Project No: Cp'""" Project 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Description: Extend Runway 16/34 per Airport layout Plan & A�4ster Plan Update for increased safery and utilization. Progress Summary• Ernironmerrtal Assessment is planned for 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Veai End Funding Sources Prior tu 201d Estimate _ 2015 Budget 2016 8ud et Pro ec[ Total UniesMcfedAirpat Revenua 8,050 7,000-" BA50 Federal Grdnt -Unsecured 144,900 126,000 144,900 State Grant -Unsecu2d 8,050 7,000. 8,050 Total Funtling Sources 161,000 140,000 181,000 Capifal ExpentliWres: Des79� 140,000 Enviionmenfal Assessment 161,000 161,000 Construct/on Tofal Expenditures: - 761,000 140,000 161,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20752020 Funding Sources UnrestncfedAirport Revenue 53,200 5g,psp Federal Grant -Unsecured 957,600 1,228,500 Sfafe Grent Lnsecured 53,200 68 250 Tofal Funding Sources: 1,084,000 - 1,365,000 Capital Ecpenditures: Design 140,OOD EnviionmeMal Assessment 161,000 ConstNCtlon 1,064.000 1,064,000 7otal ErzpendiNres: 1,064,000 - 1,365,000 Grarns /Other Sources: 233 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) CapiTal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilkies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Automated Weather Observatlon System Project No: Cp"""" Project 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Description: Install weaMer reporting equipment for insVument approach. Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: /►ctivlty. 201d YE 2015 Year End FunAing Sourcas Prior ro 207d Effimate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Project Tofal UnresMcted Airpwt Revenue - Federal Grent -Unsecured State G2nt -Unsecured Tofal Fundlnp Sources: Caplial ExpentllWres: Des/gn RigM ol Way COIISINCIW/1 7oml Expentliares: - - Forecasted P�oject Cost: rcrai 2017 2078 2019 2020 20152020 Funding Sources UnrestrlctedAlrparf Revenue 13,440 73,440 Fede21 G2nt -Unsecured 241,920 247,920 Stete Grent -Unsecured 13 400 13 440 Toal Funding Sources 288,800 268,800 Capial FxpendlWres Oeslgn - RIgM ol Way - - - ConStNLt/on 268.800 268.800 Total F�cpendiWres - 768.800 � 268.800 G2rrts /Other Sowces: 234 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan I AIRPORT FUND (435) Capitat FacilRies Plan Six Year Capifal Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Fuel Farm Project Mo: cp""' Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Descriptfon: Construct a Fuel Farm for Jet A service at Airport Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activity: 2074 YE Y015 Year Entl Funding Sourcex Prior to 2014 Estlmate 2015 Budget 2016_Budget .P.ro ect Total UnrestncfedAnport Revenue Federal Grant -Unsecured _ State Grant -Unsecuretl 7ofa1 Funding Saurces: Capital Expenditures: Des/gn Right o/ Way - COIISINLf(OII Tofal 6cpendi W res: Forecasted Projeot Cost: rotal 20�7 2018 2018 2020 20152020 Funtling$ouroes: UniestnctedA/rport Revenue 740,000 140,000 Federal Grant -Unsecuied Sfate Granf -Unsecured Total Funding Sourcex 140,000 - 740,000 Capipl ErzpenAiNres Design 25,000 25,000 RigM o/ Way - Consfrucfion 115,000 115,000 Total Erzpenditures: 140,000 - 160.000 G2rns /O[her Sources: 235 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) CapiW FacilRies Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprlse Funds Project TiUe: Land Acquisition Project No: cp*""`" Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Mana9er Shelley Coleman Description: Land Acquisition-Artnstrong Progie§s Summa_ry"� Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Activity 2014 VE 2015 Yea7 End Funding Saurees: Prior to 2014 ERtimate 2015 Bud �et 2016-Budget Pro ect 7otal UnresMcted Alrport Revenue " - - - - " " -�-"- ---� -" " - - -"--"- - - Federal Grant -Unsecured State Giant -Unsecured Total Funtling Sources - - - CapiTal E�cpendltures � Destgn Ac4uislfbn - r.0I1SfNC�IM TOtal ExpendiWRE: Forecasted Project Cost: Toml 2017 2018 _ 2019_. _ _. 1020. _ 20152020_ _ Funding Sources: UnrastnctedAiiport Revenue 36,760 36,760 Federel Grant -Unsecured 661,685 661,685 Stafe Grant -Unsecuretl 36,780 38 760 �. Total Funding Sourees - - � 735,205 735,205 ,. Capital ExpendiL�res: D¢Sign Acquisltlon - - 735,7A5 735.205 � Consttiction Total Expendituras: - - 735,205 735,205 G2rn /Other Souices� Federal Awatlon Atlministration 236 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Faclikies Plan, 2015-2020 Enterprise_Funds Project Title: Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway Project No: Cp«••• Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman DescripUon: Install Precision Approach Path Indicator(PAPI) for Rurnvay to replace aging VASI system. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Acfivky. Z01b YE 2015 Year EnA Funding Sourcex Prior b 2014 Estimate 2015 Butlget Y016 Budget Project Total UniestnctedAirpwt Revenue - Federal Grant -Unsecurerl State Granf -Unsecured Tofai Funding Sources: CaPifal ExpentliWres Design _ Righf W Way Constnictron Tofal Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 201i2020 Funding Sources: Un2slnctedAilpoR Revenue 8,400 8,400 Federel Grent -Unsecured 151,200 151,200 State Grant -Unsecured 8,400 8,400 Total Funding Sources: 166,000 768,000 Capifal EzpenGiWres: Desrgn 20,000 20.000 Right ol Way _ ConStNCNon 148,000 148,000 Total Fxpendilures: 168,000 168,000 Grants /Other Sowces: 237 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capital Facilities Plari S& Year Capital Facilities Pian, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project TiUe: West Side Fencing Project No: Cp"""" Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager• Shelley COleman Description: Install Fence on West side of property Progress Summary• Future Impact on Operating Budget: Activlty: - - 2074 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources PNor Eo 201< Estimate 2015 Budget 2016 Butlget ProJect Tofal UnrestrVcted Alrport Revenue Federal Grant -Unsecured Sfate Giant Lnsecured Tofal Funding Sources - - Capilal ExpendlWres Design R/ght o/ Way C.OlIS�NCt1011 7oql Expendimres: - - - --�--- - �- - - Forecasted Projed Cost: Topl 2017 2018 2019 2020 201&2020 Funtling Sources: UnresMcted A/ywf Revenue 2,648 2,86G Federel Grant 1/nsecu�ad 47.828 47,628 State Grent Lnsecuiatl 2,646 2,848 Total Funding Sources: 52,920 52,920 CaPlpl EtcPendiNres Deslgn - Rlght oi Way - ConstrucNon 52,920 52,920 Total Ezpentliwres - -52.920 - 52,920 c�ms i aner sa,�c�: 238 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPOItT FUND (435) Capifal Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 20152020 Enterprise Funds Project Tit1e: General Repair � Maintenance Projed No: CpxxXx Projea Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager� Shelley Coleman Descrlption: Various airport repairs and mairKenance projects to be identiFied and prioritized as needed. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Opereting Budget: Activity. 2014 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources: Prlor ro 2014 E4imate 2015 Butlget 2076 Budget Project Total Unrest�7ctedAiryort Revenue 50,000 Federal GraIR Securad State G2nf Secured Tofal Funding Sources: 50,000 - Capital ExpendiWres: Design RigM W Way Construction 50,000 50,000 Tofal FxpendlWres: 50,000 50,000 Forecasted Project Cost: TMaI 2017 2018 2019 2@0 20152020 Funding Sources UnresMctedAiryort Revenue 50,000 Fede2/ Grant Secuiad Stafe Grent -Secured Total Funding Sources - 50,000 Capifal Ezpenditurex Design _ Right W Way Construction 50,000 Total ExPendiWres: ' S0.000 Grarrts /Other Sources. 239 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan AIRPORT FUND (435) Capifal Facili[ies Plan Six Year Capital_ Facilities,Plan, 2015-2�20 Enterprise Funds Projea Ttie: Taxiway Seal Coat & Restripe Project No: CpXXxx Projea 7ype: Non-Capacity Project Manager Shelley Coleman Desc�iptioni - - This project will provide funding for seal coating and restriping of the tapway ihat was replaced in 2009. Progress Summary: Futuie Impact ori Operating Budget: Activ'rty: 2014 YE 2075 Vear End Funding Sources: Prlor to 2014 Estimate 2015 Budget 2016 Budget Prqect Total Unrestr/cted AirpwY Revenue Federal Grant Secured State Grant Secured Tofal Funding Sources: Capiql F�cpondiWres Desgn Right W Way COIISINCflWI — - - Total Expenditures: - Forecasted Project Cost: Tofal 2017 2018 2079 2020 20152020 Funding Sourcas: Unrestticted AirpuK Revenue 2,506 2,506 Faderal G2nf Secured 45,108 45,106 State Grant -Securetl 2,506 2.506 Total Funding Sources: � " ' - 50,120 50,120 Capi}al Expentlitures: Desfgn RlgM o/ Way Construction 50,120 50,120 Total Expenditures: - 50,720 50,120 G2nts /Olher Sources: 240 City of Auburn Draft Capital Faci7ities Plan CEMETERY Current Facilities The City owns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (50 acres and five buildings) that provides burial services and related merchandise for the community The Pioneer Cemetery is a historic cemetery which is no longer used for burial purposes. Table C-1 "Facilities Inventory' lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 30.03 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2014 citywide population of 74,630. The proposed LOS of 40.80 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. In addition, the cemetery will be able to offer a natural cremation garden. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any Cemetery capital facilities projects during 2015-2020. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery during the six years 20.16 —2021 TABLE C-1 Facilities Inventory Cemetery CAPACITY FACILITY #of Burial PlofslNiches LOCATION Existing lnventory.• - � Mountain ViewCemetery 2,241 2020 Mountain View Dr Pioneer Cemetery 8th&Aubum W ay No. Total Existing Inventory 2,241 Proposed Capacity Projects: New Development-Bunal P/ots 475 Memory Heights IVew Development-Burial Plots 764 10th Addition TotalProposed CapacityProjects 1,239 2U20 Projected Inventory Total 3,480 241 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � - � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 242 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan GOLF COURSE Current Facilities The City of Auburn owns and operates the 18-hole Auburn Municipal Golf Course. A PGA Class A professional is contracted to collect g�eens fees, operate the pro shop and snack bar, provide golf carts for rent, and offer a lesson program. Table GC-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 0.24 holes per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2014 citywide population of 74,630. The proposed LOS of 0.21 holes per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include ariy Golf Course capital facilities projects during 2015-2020. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecast for new goff course facilities during the six years 2016 —2021 TABLE GC-1 Facilities Inventory Golf Course caancirr FACILITY # of holes LOCATION Existing Inventory.• Aubum Municipal C,olf Course 18 29639 Green Rioer Road Total Existing Inventay 18 Proposed Capacity Projects: None Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2019 Pro'eoted Invento Total 18 243 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � - - � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED z� City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan �ii POLICE Current Facilities The City of Auburn Police Department provides a full range of law enforcement services to the citizens of Auburn. All Divisions of the Auburn Police Department are housed at 340 East Main Street, Suite 201 The Divisions include Patrol, Investigations, Administrative Services, Inspectional Services, and Records. Level of Service (LOS) The City of Auburn Police Department contracts with SCORE, an outside entity, for housing of all misdemeanant inmates. CapiWl Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any Police capital facilities projects during 2015- 2020. Impact on Future Opereting Budgets Thejail services expenses are dependent on the City's contract agreement with SCORE. 245 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan � � CITY OF � � �k MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED 246 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan FIRE PROTECTION Current Facilities The Valley Regional Fire Authority provides fire protection and rescue services to a 25-square mile area which includes the City of Auburn, the City of Algona, the City of Pacific and King County Fire Protection District 31 The Valley Regional Fire Authority operates out of fve stations, which are manned 24 hours per day The North Station #31 also serves as the department headquarters and includes a hose and training tower Each station is assigned fire apparatus (Engines and Aid Vehicles). Table F-1 "Facilities Inventory' lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 0.21 fire apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory (16 fire apparatus) divided by the 2014 citywide population of 74,630. The proposed LOS of 0.20 fire apparatus per 1,000 is based on the 2020 planned inventory(17 fire apparatus) divided by the 2020 projected citywide population of 85,288. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing l`he Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one capital project at a cost of $510,000 for fire apparatus enhancements and improvements. Table F-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by an individual worksheet showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for fire protection during the six years 2016—2021 247 Ciry ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE F-1 Facilities Inventory Valley Regional Fire Authority cnPncirr FACILITY Fire araWs Aid VehiGes LOCATION Ezisting lriventoryi- - - - Stations: North Station#31 1101 'D'Street NE, Aubum First Line 1 1 Reserve 1 1 South Statlon#32 1951 'R'Street SE, Aubum First Vhe 1 1 Reserve 1 1 Lakeland Station 1133 500 182nd A�,e E, Aubum First Une 1 - Reserve 1 - Lea Hill Station#34 31290 124th A�e SE, Aubum First line 1 - Reserve 1 - GSA Station�i35 2815 C St SW,Aubum Reserve 1 1 Pacific Station�R38 133 3rd A�e SE, Pacific First Line 1 - Resenre 1 Total Existing lnveMay 11 5 Proposed Inveniay Additions: None 1 Tota/Propased Capacity Projects 1 - 2020 Projected Inveritory Total 12 5 248 City ofAuburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan TABLE F-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 2015 2b16 2017 2018 2079 2020 Total Nor�Cauacitv Proiects: 1 Fre Station Facility Relxation, Enhancements& Improvements Capital Costs 460,000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 Funding Sources. Grants - - - - - - . Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - ImpacUNitigation Fees 460,000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 SUMMARY• CAPITAL COSTS CapacityProjects - - - - - - _ Non-Capacity Projects 460,000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 Total Costs 460;000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 FUNDING SOURCES: CemeteryFund - - - - - - - Grants(Fed,State,local) - - - - - - _ Bond Proceeds 460,000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 Total Funding 460,000 50,000 - - - - 510,000 249 City ofAuburn Draft Capita!Facilities Plan Valley Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilkies Plan Six Year Capilal Faciittles Plan, 2015-2020 Project Ttie: Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements 8 Improvements Projact No: cpxxxx Project Type: Pmject Manager Mark Horaski Description: Facility Improvemerrt projects are iderrtified and prioritized annualy and are subject to delay to accommodate emergency repairs. The Valley Regior�l Fire Authority includes one project in 2015 for apparetus enhancemeMs ard improvemerrts. Progress Summary• Fire mitigation and impacl fees will be traruferred to the Valley Regional Fire Authority to pay for apparatus enhancemerrts ard improvemerAs in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Biennial Budget: sota 2ots 2018 2o�szois Notes: Budget Butlget BuEget Budget Atlopfetl Butlgef = Butlgef Amentlmenfs Atl%usred Budge( - Activity• (PreNous 2 Vrs ) 2014 VE 2074 Yeer End Funding Sources: Prlor ro 2074 Estlmate_ _1015.Budget_ 2016 Budget P.ro�ect Totai Grants - Bond Pioceeds - - Impact/Mtigation Fees 100,000 50,000 460,000 50.000 610,000 7oTel Funding Sources: 700,000 30,000 460,000 50,ODD 610,000 CaPifal F�cpenEltures Design ' Righf o/ Way ConStNCI(on 100.000 50.000 460,OOD 50.000 6�0.000 Tofel ExpendiWres: 100,000 50,000 460,000 50,000 610,000 Foreoasted Projeat Cost: rwai 2017 2018 2019 2020 20752020 Funding Sources GraMs - - Bond Proceeds - Impect/IvYti9atlon Fees 510 000 Total Funding Sourees: 570,000 Capital Fxpanditures - Des/gn - RigM oi Way Constiuction 510.000 Totel ExpendlWres: 570,000 25� Exhibit "B" Staff report dated November 6, 2014, which included the Findings and Conclusions adopted by the P/anning Commission ----------------------- Ordinance No. 6541 November 12, 2014 Page 6 , � �CIlYOF � " ��"' 1 " ' AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM WASHINGTON Agenda Subject Date: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendments — City November 6, 2014 Initiated Plan Polic /Text Amendments DepaRment: Community Aftachments: See separate Budget Impact: N/A Development & Public Works summary matrix and the policy/text amendment sections of the binder Administrative Recommendation: Planning and Cominunity Development Committee to reView planning commission recommendation on 2014 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Background Summary• The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act(GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). This year the city is initiating: • Five policy/text amendments. • (No map amendments are proposed with this year's amendment process) In addition, this year the city received two privately-initiated plan map amendments by the submittal deadline. However, since the two aPplications for adjacent sites by the same Applicant were submitted w'ithout the necessary environmental checklist application (required pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA)), the Applicant has agreed to defer the city's consideration of the applications until consideration of the larger overall Comprehensive Pian Update effort in 2015. This staff report and recommendation addresses Comprehensive PolicylText(P/T)Amendments P1T# 1 through# 5. This is the oniy staff report associated with the annual comprehensive plan amendment process. In terms of process, the Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year Reviewed 6y Council 8 Committees: Reviewed by Departments&Divisions: ❑Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITiEES: ❑ Building ❑ M&O ❑ Auport ❑ Finance ❑ Cemetery ❑ Mayor ❑ Hearing Examiner ❑ Municipal Services ❑ Finance ❑ Parks ❑ Human Services ❑ Planning&Dev ❑ Fire � Planning � Park Board ❑ Public Works ❑ Legal ❑ Police � Planning Comm ❑ Other � Public Works ❑ Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: ❑Yes ❑No Council Approval: ❑Yes �No Call for Public Hearing _/_/_ Referred to - Until / / Taliled Until %% Councilmemlier: Holman � - Staff:Tate Meetiri Date: November 10, 2014 Item Number; Page 1 of 8 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGWED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments—City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and PolicylText Amendments At its November 5, 2014 public hearing, the Planning Commission reviewed the following annual comprehensive plan amendments: P/T#1 — Incorporate Aubum School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T#2— Incorporate Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T#3 — Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T#4 — Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T#5— Incorporate City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan The Planning Commission has forward its recommendation for approval to the City council on all comprehensive plan amendments. The 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendments were previously reviewed by the Planning ancJ Community Development Committee of the city cbuncil at the June 23, 2014 regular meeting. A. Findings 1 RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law, compreherisive plan amendments shail be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year 2. The City of Auburn established a June 6, 2014 deadline for the submittal of privately- initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/te�). Notice to the public of the filing deadline was provided on the City's website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in May 2014 The City received two privately-initiated plan map amendments by the submittai deadline. The Applicant agreed to defer the city's consideration of the applications until consideration of the larger overall Comprehensive Plan Update effort in 2015 The postponement was accepted by the Planning and Corrimunity Development Committee at their June 23, 2014 meeting. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City's Capital Facilities Plan are referenced in Chapter 5, Capital Facilities, of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4 The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared seParately by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by state law. 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the remaining amendment resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 16, 2014 (City File# SEP14- 0011). The comment period ended September 30, 2014 and the appeal period ended October 14, 2014 6. The City did not receive any comments in response to the issuance of the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS). Page 2 of 8 AUBURI�T * MORE THAN YOU IMAGWED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Gomprehensive Plan Date: November6, 2014 Amendments-Gity Initiated PIan�Map Amendments.and Policy/Text Amendments 7 Each of the school districYs acting as their own lead agency as allowed under SEPA conducted their own environmental review and issued separate Determinations of Non- Significance (DNS). 8. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: "Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1 For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the ofFicial newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice sfiall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the directo� may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary C Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shali conduct a public hearing on ail potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to ttie city council. D The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)" 9. As prbvided in the code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the Gity of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but•is not required, prior to the end of the year 10. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the stafe review on October 9, 2014 The Washington State Office of Commerce acknowledged receipt by letter dated October 13, 2014. No comments have Page 3 of 8 AUBURN � MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments—City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 11 Due to the nature and limited number of policy/text changes, and the lack of private initiated map amendments, the optional process for a public open house was not conducted as provided for in the city code. 12. The notice of public hearing was published on October 14, 2014 in the Seattle Times which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 5, 2014 13. The 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendments were previously reviewed tiy the Planning and Community Development Committee of the city council at the June 23, 2014 regular meeting. 14 On November 5, 2014 the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed annual amendments as part of the process required by code. 15. On November 10, 2014 the Planning and Community Development Committee of the city council will review the planning commissibn's �ecommendation. 16. The following report identifies the Comprehensive Plan Map Policy/Text (Pff) amendments that were scheduied for the Planning Commission's November 5, 2014 public hearing with a staff recommendation and the subsequent Planning Commission recommendation. -=-----=-----November 5, 2014 Planning Commission Public Hearing -------------------------- Comprehensive Plan Map Afnendments (File No. CPA14-00071 (No map amendments are proposed with thrs year's amendment process) Comprehensive Plan Policv/TextAmendments (File No. CPA74-00071 PIT#1 Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 into the City of Aubu[n Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2014-2020. The CFP was adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Direetors on June 9, 2014 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Defermination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the Aubum School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plari. The CFP includes the following: • six—year enroilment projections • Auburn school district level of service standards • The districYs overall capacity of the 6-year period Page 4 of 8 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments—City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments • An inventory of existing facilities • Impact fee calculations • District capital construction Plan A review of the Auburn School DistricYs updated Gapital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $4,137.21, a decrease of$1,261 72 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $3,518.17, an increase of$130.33. The actual impact fee to be assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 to the City Council Planninp Commission Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Aubum School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014 through 2020 to the City Couricil P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2020 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2015 -2020. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on June 17, 2014 The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following: • Overview • An inventory of existing facilities • six—year enrollment projections • standard of service • Capacity projects • Finance plan . Impact fee calculations A review of the Dieringer School DistricYs updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,231 00, an increase of$2,016.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $1,839; an increase of$144 00. The actual impact fee to be assessed is set by ordinance by the Aubum City Council. Siaff Recommendation Planning Cbmmission to recommend approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2020 to the City Council. Page 5 of 8 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments—City Initiated Plan Map Amehdments and Policy/Text Amendments Planninq Commission Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2020 to the City Council. During the course to the deliberation, the Planning Commission asked that the calculations contained in the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Flan 2015-2020 be carefully reviewed. P/T#3 Incorporate Federai Way School DistricYs 2015 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (2015). The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board June 24, 2014 The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the foilowing: • Intrbduction • Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities • Needs forecast, existing & new facilities • Siic—year finance plan • Maps of district boundaries • Building capacities & portabie locations • Studentforecast • Capacity summaries • Impactfeecalculations • Summary of changes from the 2014 plan A review of the Federal Way School DistricYs updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,171 00, representing a decrease of$192.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $1,834.00, a decrease of$90.00. The actual impact fee to be assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Federal Way School DistricYs 2015 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council Planttinv Commission Recommendation Plaririing Commission to recommend approval of the Federal Way School District's 2015 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T#4 Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Page 6,of 8 AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments—City Initiated PIan.Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on June 25, 2014 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City's collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan. The CFP includes the following: • Executive Summary • Six-year enroliment projection & history • District standard of service • Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools • Six-year planning & construction plan • Portable classrooms • Projected classroom capacity • Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules . Summary of changes to previous plan A review of the Kent School District's updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is not requesting a change in the fees. The Plan indicates the continuing net fee obligation for single-family dwellings of$5,486.00, representing no change, and for multi-family dwellings a fee of$3,378.00, also rePresenting no change. The actual impact fee to be assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Staff Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 to the City Council P/ann/nq Commission Recommendation Planriing Commissiori to recominend approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 to the City Council CPM #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn's 6-year Capitai Facilities Plan 2015-2020, into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future neeiis for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six,year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2015- 2020 satisfies the GMA requiremenfs for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Page 7 of S AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGWED Agenda Subject: CPA14-0001, 2014 Comprehensive Plan Date: November 6, 2014 Amendments-City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and PolicylText Amendments Each comprehensive pian prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of fhe GMA requires the following: "A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital faciiities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of ineeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capifal facilities plan element." A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capitai facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary anciliary and support facilities. The memo dated October 2, 2014 from the City's Finance Department contained in the three ring binder highlights the major changes in the CFP from last year The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2020 is incorporated by �eference in the Comprehensive Plan, Chapter 5, Capital Facilities. Sfaff Recommendafion Planning Commission to recommend approval of the City of Auburn's 6-year Capital Facilities Pian 2015-2020 to the City Council. Planninp Commission Reaommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the City of Auburn's 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2015-2020 to the City Council with the amendment that the Planning Commission recommends that the City study the extension of sidewalks along Auburn Way South, south of Hemlock Street SE for pedestrian safety reasons. Page 8 of 8 AUBURN * �ORE THAN YOU IMAGINED