Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-09-2014 LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS HandoutsE CSO�C H�. A R!R_EHE LGCC 12.09.14 Pg. 10 III.A. Teen /com Ctr Dsgn status Submitted: Daniel Podoll To quickly understand what drives this project, Eco- charrette participants were asked to share one word that represesnted what would make the ACCYC project a success. They shared these words: Inclusive FUNCTIONAL g SAFE >_ v Source of reat valuable to the community memories v ru We 0 co m 0 n g CONNECTIVITY ,`^„ Adaptable to future Q DESTINATION � Communication 0 LL Destination Q FLEXIBLE Responsiveeam Exciting Q i City Loved City Used `^ Well- loved v N Best Value W ON TIME ON BUDGET C Maintainable c on -budge COMPLETE z Q v People O C cn a a 0 c Space should be full Happy When asked what words would describe an UNsuccessful ACCYC project, participants said: Poor marketing once built E un- noticed mis- communication s Boring Antiseptic Empty space I I,�jve re- EH� u d g et.�' WIGW y c MAINTENANCE 3 O Static v V) Non - participatory i O } Cu disorganized £ U V - unpopular non - fucntional siogeuse change orders non - active unhappy Not on Time D cnd Smelly Underut'0 ,,,.not used fermata Auburn community center it Youth Center Eco Cherreue Report PAGE 14 Z 0 0. to J a Of LL w V) Q! w U w v a c C v N 6 C v C CL v X x w ra m J a 0 LL 0 7) LL V u Z E, Q010 _,R&iTiE 4.1 OVER ARCHING GOALS A few recurring themes appeared through the Eco- Charrette dialogue that apply to the project in general. Based on our observation of the discussion, we recommend that the following themes be used to guide the design process: 1. The project must be on time and within the allocated budget. This means that green building strategies must make financial sense and not require significant additional research time. 2. The building should be welcoming and safe. Because of the current transient problem in the area, it is important to avoid nooks and crannies and to design a building and landscape that is highly visible and easily approachable. 3. The combination of various age groups and activities should always be kept in mind and the design should be flexible to support these unique attributes of the project. 4. Create a building that the community is proud of! 5. Maintenance staff should be involved in the project decisions, specifically green building strategies. If a strategy is not maintainable within City resources, it should not be considered. 6. The building should be integrated with the park. 7. The future expansion and adoption of greener strategies should be kept in mind by the design team. The design should be able to adapt and grow and provisions should be made to do so. 8. LEED Silver certification is the minimum requirement, but Gold certification is desirable if it falls within the budget and addresses all the other over - arching goals of the project. 0 fermata Auhwn Community Center & Youth Ceme, - Ec. Chanetre Re,.,t PAGE 13 BACK GROUND 3. BACKGROUND 3.1 PROJECT CONTEXT: 3.1 .1 SITE, CIRCULATION AND CONNECTIONS As the architects described during the Eco Charrette, the context of the site can be understood by viewing the site at three scales. The following three maps were provided by the architects. Scale 1:1000 - suburban scale Scale 1:500 - community scale We further encourage the team to consider the site in the context of its watershed. The city of Auburn lies southeast of Seattle, in the southeastern part of the Puget Sound lowland. It is a part of the larger Green - Duwamish Watershed serving localities of Renton, Kent, Auburn, Convington, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and Tukwila. i The Green /Duwamish River Watershed ad.a.ar e m.m M... SMa1aM.E � QK1lIRWrL County Na`WM Pefou.m.V hM1S Drums w...m...... arrant w.r.r uW Um v.wurm oM.bn .�crr..en. r fermata Auburn communay cent., a Youth center - Eco Charrette Report PAGE 6 SMa1aM.E � 00010BAUKGROUND 3.1 .2 ECOLOGY: CLIMATE, VEGETATION, SOIL AND TOPOGRAPHY Climate: Auburn has a temperate climate with pleasant and relatively dry summers and winters with cool, sunny, or cloudy days.The warmest month is August and the wettest month is November. Temperature range in winter is between 33 F to 51 F and in summer from 49 F to 72 F. The prevailing winds are generally from the south and southwest. Annual precipitation is around 39.39 inches. Wind Speed (mph) Sunshine Average Temperatures Source: http: / /www. city- data. com /city /Auburn- Washington.html #b WNtrl"-r , fib FERMATA SUGGESTS: BUILDING ORIENTATION AND ROOF ANGLE SHOULD BE ESTABLISHED WITH FUTURE PV SYSTEM IN MIND. ROOF DESIGN AND LANDSCAPE SHOULD BE CAREFULLY THOUGHT OUT TO AVOID REDUCING EFFICACY OF FUTURE PV SYSTEMS. FURTHERMORE, STRIVE TO ORIENT THE BUILDING (OR, AT LEAST SOME COMPONENTS) AS CLOSE TO EAST -WEST AS FEASIBLE TO OPTIMIZE DAYLIGHT DESIGN AND MINIMIZE GLARE CHALLENGES. SINCE NATURAL VENTILATION IS AN UNLIKELY STRATEGY ON THIS PROJECT, PLACE LESS EMPHASIS ON WIND PATTERNS AND MORE EMPHASIS ON MINIMIZING DEMAND FOR BOTH HEATING AND COOLING. CONSIDER BUILDING AND ROOF COLOR, SURROUNDING VEGETATION, AND PLACEMENT OF PROGRAM AREAS WITH MICROCLIMATE W MIND. °fermata Auburn Community Center 3 Youth Center - Eco Chaneue Report PAGE 8 BACKGROUND 3.3 LEED TIMELINE: Following is a suggested LEED milestone timeline for the project. This is provided to give an idea about the general pace of the project and the amount of involvement expected of the design team with regards to the LEED certification process. November 2014 Schematic ------- -- - - - - - ... • • • • . • • . Eco Charrette on November 4, 2014 Design .. ` ........... LEED Check -in meeting with Architects Design- - - -- ---- - - - - -- Development . • .......... LEED Check -in meeting with Architects .. ........... LEED Drawings and Specification Review by Fermata Construction - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Documents ........... LEED Drawings and Specification Back -check by Fermata Construction --- -- ---- - - - - -- Starts . • .......... Begin LEED Design Phase Submittals .... • ..... • Begin LEED Construction Phase Submittals Project - -- -� . • ---- - - - - -- ..... • .... •Submit LEED Documentation for USGBC Review Completed LEED Certification 2016 °fermata Auburn Community Center w Youth Center . Ero [h'illetto Report PAGE 1 7 3 p r, di � U LEED -NC 2009 CD Project Scorecard Q fermata 18 7 0 1 $u stainable Sites Possible Points: 26 111 1 4 1 0 1 D _Indoor Environmental Quality Possible Points: 15' Y 9Y IN N Y oY IN N �L SEP1- C anSUUdron Actany Polluuan Preaenlyr, Q 1 soil Mrnlmumlro— H,nuelrry Pe,......a 0 Sob stil on 1 Y IEOpi- Eir- onmenal loeecco sma4e Ei5l COnuol 0 YI 5 sUl D-1.1- 11tynuty n Cammaniry COnno.111 5 1 IEOC 1 outdoor Air Cemary Mon loing 1 1 .., - final lale Find ... dir —al 1 1 sopyl r aced vita lava 1 6 E.I - emave Taneparlaeon- PUOlc 1renap..1., A,... 6 1 IEne]1 CanahuNOn loam, Aa OualiryMlagemanl Plan- Drying eonstncaan 1 1 YA2- ernave TancpeNUOn- Buy -1 Slay,A on- gre'no., 1 1 Enc32 CanahuNOn lad Management Plan - Belara Opp,,.ry 1 'J Eyo4. - allernarly Turandontion- LOwdmd,ng6Fueldr ... l Ve�eln 3 1 IEDCet- Low- Emidinq Ma annals- ANe- 12forel s 1 2 RA,41- bmave an orison -poll Capay 2 1 coup L—Eir Meranal, - Early A Laadnga 1 1 fol1 -pile radial - POI - at Finn eNitial 1 1 polo LO..Emrtung spatula - rloonng cysleme 1 1 6x52 - sue o... nom.nt. Maan.a. open sure 1 1 Ell a. o..Emrwn, hoarls,. unit Vital s Agrv,v Intl 1 1 ell for —'er Decry,- a...taycalll 1 1 IE «s. manor Chianti A Pol —soda. Cannot 1 1 ree 2. pram n.al.r D..ogn -(i Crawl 1 t EOCBI cmwll,mm, m system,- uvndng 1 q 65c].I � eel l4and flea- Ran...I 1 1 IEOCB] � Cmdoll,dlhW Sol rat -iholl Comfort 1 1 $SC].2 eel iota no Ell- ROel 1 1 EDC],I � tnermtl Camton Deupn 1 1 Son, L.", Pdluuon Red -I., 1 1 EDC]2 �iner m,ICOm1o1- Vanl¢aoon 1 _ 1 W IECCtS.1 z sv..s Dayrvm s m..e. DaMgN 1 6 0 2 2 ater Efficiency Possible'POints: 1a1a 1 leoe - Dayuanr-vb",5 1 Y >V IN N 2 2 ::wept - web, use ant Lando) tax a.daaan Q 1 3 0 2 InOOVatiOnBDesign Possible POin[s:6 C woo Emeenr Lamuadng 4 V '2V IN N 2 WECg - InnwAVe WeSewern ittM1nd5gie5 Z 1 ICC 1.1- InnovaJ non Design 1 q VJEC] Watn and R adocuon q ICC12 Innwato. m Desgn _ locl].Innwavcn rn ce,�pl 1 ] 19 0 15 EnergyBAtmosphere Possible Pointe: 35 i locta�Inno,avan rn Deaw+ 1 V 4Y IN N I I I 1 1 1 IDC15- "aAfran in D, 1 EApl- Fundinvall Cammauomng al Ne fill ErRc, Sysbna 0 1 1.2- LEEDAndev.e pratfa nal 1 EAp2 - Minimum Ennvy Fron —m m 0 Y EA p]- rrrrrmmaow Reelgnam Minarenem 0 1 2 0 1 Regional Priority Credits Possible Points:4 5 5 9 Ell Dpom.e on, Peno,mance 19 Y ?Y IN N 1 6 Ell . on -are Ranenade Eoepy ] 1 RE 1 - Reaionm Prmdry 1 2 Ell - Enh—nd Conmisir, 2 j RZ I - Regional Pnonty 1 2 Eltl - Enhanceo Rehoger m..1ti m m 2 1 Ell , Regional Pnonry 1 3 Ell - easmeff A vailnudon 3 1 RPC1 a - Regional Pnonry, 1 z E. -Green Pda— 2 8 3 2 1 Materials 8 Resources Possible Points: 14 ® Tolgl Possible,Pointi 1111 V ?Y IN N Cenifill 40 -09, Silver: 5059, Geld: 60 -79, Platinum: BD -110 y fir salary a Corral of Raarclal 0 1 1 1 offinI DUIIdmp Ell- Maintain Eriy., Walk, Fl—a ROOF 3 1 .1111- Buildup Re use - Mainain lnbno r N,do.a er El -amts 1 2 MEp2 - ConsPUNan Wasre Management 2 2 MRCS - Moaned Reuu 2 2 MRCd - R.u,.a Content 2 2 Me5 - Regional Materials 2 1 MRaD- Rapidly Renal Mare ,, als 1 1 MRC1 - Gemmed wood 1 m r_ Z D r m m n_ m n E- r to na �j n a S ff1 �1 r E,@ CC1HAR:R:E�TiTiE. 5. NEXT STEPS 1. Review and confirm (or revise) the goals and strategies listed in this report. 2. Based on the findings of this report and subsequent discussion with the design team, owner should make a decision on pursuing LEED Silver or Gold certification. It will be Fermata's responsibility to steer the team towards the anticipated LEED certification level. 3. Schedule a LEED check -in meeting to refine the LEED credits the design team should pursue. 4. Follow the LEED timeline provided herein to ensure LEED requirements are fully executed. 5. Develop LEED- required commissioning documents right away. These documents include the Owners' Project Requirements (OPR) and the Basis of Design (BOD) documents. C° fermata Auburn eemr, a Y.oll Ceme, - EC. Cha„ 11e Re1olt PAGE 24 Building • Center of the community / geo graphic center /honor center of town across generations / urban center • Icon — Want to come not just need to come • Multi- generational • New design examples — look to European models • Think not only outside the box, but NO box • Celebrate who we are — a gallery — creates ownership • Community garden • Transportation node — partnership with school / WIFI connectivity • Natural (controllable) light — evaluate the potential for solar collection • Create hang -out (home away from home) • Design to CPTED standards (crime prevention thru environmental design) Program • Draw targeted groups — ethnically diverse, create cultural and transitional ownership • Flexibility — create generational cross -over (teens teaching smart mobility, 60 yr. olds teaching chess) • Program for: Science Troubled Teens Health/Wellness Addressing inclusiveness / homelessness • Space for: Privacy — the "lava lamp room" and to move beyond our comfort level Classrooms that are flexible Infant /toddlers, cry room, tumbling Pets (pet friendly) Artwork Any Beyond • Coordinate work of this contract with the Masterplan contract • Challenge to Junior City Council members Use your social media contacts to garnish input Landscape Architect: • Overlaying observations based upon options • Parking /Park — collaborative use of each Cost Consultant: • ROM (Rough Order of Magnitude) cost on design direction once confirmed LEED Consultant: • Completed draft report — final to follow soon • Await user "checklists" Traffic Consultant: • Parking analysis to begin • Beginning traffic analysis Architect: • Options analysis • 3D model of existing buildings is complete