HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-25-2016 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDACity Council Study Session
January 25, 2016 - 5:30 PM
Auburn City Hall
AGENDA
Watch the meeting LIVE!
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. Roll Call
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS, REPORTS, AND PRESENTATIONS
A. Alive & Free Education Presentation (20 Minute Presentation/15 Minute
Q&A) (Lee)
B. Auburn Youth Resources Update (15 Minute Presentation/10 Minute Q&A)
III. AGENDA ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION
A. Resolution No. 5203 (10 Minute Presentation/5 Minute Discussion)* (Faber)
Resolution of the City Council of the City of Auburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to execute an amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement between King County and the City of Auburn for open
space acquisition projects
B. Council Discussion on Pro/Con of the Study Session Format (30 Minute
Presentation/45 min Q&A)* (Hinman)
C. Council Retreat Goals (5 Minute Presentation/10 Minute Q&A)* (Hinman)
IV. ADJOURNMENT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City
website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are
available for review at the City Clerk's Office.
*Denotes attachments included in the agenda packet.
Page 1 of 21
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Alive & Free Education Presentation (20 Minute
Presentation/15 Minute Q&A)
Date:
November 23, 2015
Department:
Police
Attachments:
No Attachments Available
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Educate the Council and community about the work and how the City of Auburn is
partnering and supporting with Alive & Free. This presentation will include goals and
impact of the program.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Lee
Meeting Date:January 25, 2016 Item Number:AN.1
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDAN.1 Page 2 of 21
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5203 (10 Minute Presentation/5 Minute
Discussion)
Date:
January 14, 2016
Department:
Parks/Art and Recreation
Attachments:
Resolution No. 5203
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5203.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn was successful in a grant to receive funds from King County
Conservation Futures Tax Levy related to the acquisition of the “Herr Properties”. The
scope of this application was to seek matching funds to purchase four parcels of land
totaling 1.44 acres (parcel numbers 192105-9006, 192105-9299, 192105-9158,
192105-9154, that would allow for the acquisition of existing commercial space that,
as required by this source of funds, must be converted into park space. The location
of the acquisition is adjacent to Auburn’s Les Gove Park. To utilize this source of
funds the acquired properties must be redeveloped into “park space” consistent with
the Les Gove Master Plan. The application noted that “Les Gove Park is envisioned
as Auburns “Central Park” but it is blocked visible from Auburn Way by a large
commercial block of properties. City Council has long had a goal of “opening up Les
Gove Park to Auburn Way”.”
The parcels, that were acquired in 2014, are located on Auburn Way South as well as
on 12th Street. The acquisition of these parcels provide the opportunity for expansion
of the urban park as well as provide a welcoming site corridor into the existing 21 Acre
Park. Les Gove Park is the home to the Auburn Senior Center, White River Valley
Museum, King Counties Auburn Library as well as the Auburn Community and Teen
Center that is under construction.
The acceptance and allocation of these funds will authorize the City of Auburn to seek
reimbursement of up to $546,906. These funds will provide substantial dollars for the
design and development of the Auburn Community Campus at Les Gove Park and
may be used for matching funds for other grant opportunities.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 3 of 21
Councilmember:Staff:Faber
Meeting Date:January 25, 2016 Item Number:DI.B
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.B Page 4 of 21
RESOLUTION NO. 5 2 0 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION
FUTURES INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF AUBURN
FOR OPEN SPACE ACQUISITION PROJECTS
WHEREAS, King County has established a Conservation Futures Levy Fund and
has appropriated proceeds to provide for the acquisition of open spaces within the
County; and
WHEREAS, King County Council passed Ordinance Number 17707, which
appropriates specific Conservation Futures Levy proceeds for the City of Auburn Les
Gove Park expansion acpuisition project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn is interested and willing to enter into an
Amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between the
County and the City for open space acquisition, beneficial to the Les Gove Park in
conformity with fhe requirements of the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor of the City of Auburn is hereby authorized to execute a
Amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between
King County and the City of Auburn for open space acquisition related to the Les Gove
Park, which Amendment to the Conservation Futures Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
shall be in substantial conformity with the document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and
incorporated herein by this reference.
Resolution No 5203
January 12, 2016
Page 1 of 2
DI.B Page 5 of 21
Section 2. The Mayor is hereby authbrized to take such administrative and/or
procedural action as may be necessary and/or appropriate to carry out the directives of
this legislation.
Section 3. This resolution shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
signatures hereon.
Dated and Signed this day of 2016.
CITY OF AUBURN
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk
APPRO ED AS TO FORM:
D ' I B. Heid, City Attorney
Resolution No. 5203
January 12, 2016
Page 2 of 2
DI.B Page 6 of 21
AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION FUTURES
INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KING COUNTY AND THE CITY OF AUBURN
FOR OPEN SPACE ACQUIS[TION PROJECTS
Preamble
The King County Council, through Ordinance 9128, has established a Conservation Futures
Levy Fund and appropriated proceeds to King County, the City of Seattle and certain suburban
cities. This amendment is entered into to provide for the allocation of additional funds made
available foi open space acquisition.
THIS AMENDMENT is entered into between the CITY OF AUBURN and KING COIJNTY,
and amends and attaches to and is part thereof of the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
entered into between the parties on the 3rd day of October, 2005, as previously amended.
The parties agree to the following amendments:
Amendment 1: Article 1. Recitals
A paragraph is hereby added to the Recitals Section to provide for Conservation Futures Levy
Fund allocations for the Les Gove Pazk Expansion acquisition Project, and hereafter reads`.
On December 9, 2013 the King County Council passed Ordinance 17707, which
appropriated a total of Three Hundred and Twenty-Five thousand dollars ($325,000) in
Conservation Futures Levy proceeds to the City oF Aubum for the Les Gove Park
Expansion acquisition Project. On April 28, 2014 the King County Council passed
Ordinance U795, authorizing the King County Executive to enter into interlocal
agreements with the City of Seattle and the suburban cities for the disbursement of
Conservation Futures Funds appropriated in Ordinance 17707.
On July 28, 2014, the King County Council passed Ordinance 17855, which appropriated
a total ofOne Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000) in Conservation Futures Levy
proceeds to the Ciry of Aubum for the Les Gove Park Expansion acquisition Project. On
December 15, 2014, the King County Council passed Ordinance 17957, authorizing the
King County Executive to enter into interlocal agreements with the City of Seattle and
the suburban cities for the disbursement of Conservation Futures Funds appropriated in
Ordinance 17855.
AmendmeN D
CFT Intedocal Auburn—Kmg County
2014&2015 CFI'proceeds
DI.B Page 7 of 21
On September 14, 2015 the King County Council passed Ordinance 181 ]0, which
appropriated a total of One Hundred Twenty-One, Nine Hundred and Six dollars
121,906) in Conservation Futures Levy proceeds to the City of Aubum for the Les
Gove Park Addition acquisition Project. On November 9, 2015, the King County Council
passed Ordinance 18151, authorizing the King County Executive to enter into interlocal
agreements with the City of Seattle and the suburban cities for the disbursement of
Conservation Futures Funds appropriated in Ordinance I 81 10.
Amendment 2: Article V. Conditions of ALreement
Section 5.1 is amended to include Attachment D, which lists 2014 and 2015
Conservation Futures Levy proceeds allocations for the Les Gove Park Expansion
acquisition Project.
Amendment 3: Article VII. Responsibilities of Countv
The first two sentences of this article are amended to include references to Attachment D, which
lists 2014 and 2015 Conservation Futures Levy proceeds allocations for the Les Gove Park
Expansion acquisition Project;
Subject to the terms of this agreement, the County will provide Conservation
Futures Levy Funds in the amounts shown in Attachments A tHrough D, to be
used for the Projects listed in Attachments A through D. The City may request
additional funds; however, the County has no obligation to provide funds to the
City for the Projects in excess of the total amounts shown io Attachments A
through D. The County assumes no obligation for the future support of the
Projects described herein except as expressly set forth in this agreement.
AMENDMENT 4: AttachmentD
The Attachments to the interlocal agreement are hereby amended by adding Attachment D,
which is hereby attached to the interlocal agreement, incorporated therein and made a part
thereof.
In all other respects, the terms, conditions, duties and obligations of both paRies shall remain the
same as agreed ro in the [nterlocal Cooperation Agreement as previously amended.
Amendment U
CF!Imerlocal Auburn—King Counry
2014&2015 CFf procceds
2
DI.B Page 8 of 21
This document shall be attached to the existing Interlocal Cooperation Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, authorized representatives ofthe parties hereto have signed their
names in the spaces set forth below:
KING COUNTY CITY OF AUBURN
Dow Constantine
King County Executive Mayor
Date: Date
Acting iinder the authority of Acting under the authority of
Ordinances 17795, 17957 and 18151 Ordinance
Approved as to form: Approved as to form:
Dan Satterberg
King County Prosecuting Attomey Ciry Attorney
Amendmem D
CFI'INerlocal Auburn—King Counry
2014&2015 CFI'procwds
3
DI.B Page 9 of 21
EXHIBIT D
2014 and 2015 CONSERVATION FUTURES LEVY
CITY OF AUBURN ALLOCATIONS
Jurisdiction Pro'ect Allocation
Aubum Les Gove Park Expansion 325,000
Ordinance 17707/17795
Aubum Les Gove Park Expansion 00,000
Ordinance U855/17957)
Aubum Les Gove Park Expansion 121,906
Ordinance 181I0/18151)
TOTAL 546,906
Project Descriptions:
Ordinances17707/17795):
1122033 Aubum - WLCF Les Gove Park Expansion
This is a new four-parcel acquisition project totaling 1.44 acres on Aubum Way at 12th Street SE
in downtown Auburn. The primary purpose of the project is to create a visual presence for Les
Gove Park from Auburn Way South, one of Aubum's most traveled thoioughfares.
Ordinances17855/17957);
1122033 Aubum —Les Gove Pazk Expansion
This is a four-parcel acquisition project totaling 1.44 acres on Aubum Way at l2th Street SE in
downtown Auburn. The primary purpose of the project is to create a visual presence for Les
Gove Park from Aubum Way South, one of Aubum's most traveled thoroughfares.
2014: $100,000 is transferred to this project from the abandoned City of Aubum Chuck Perry
PropeRy, as this project has an acquisition funding shortfall.
Ordinances18110/18I51):
1122033 Aubum— Les Gove Park Addition
fhis is a four-parcel acquisition project totaling 1.44 acres on Auliurn Way at 12th Street SE in
downtown Aubum. The primazy purpose of the project is to create a visual presence for Les
Gove Park from Aubum Way South, one of Aubum's most traveled thoroughfazes.
2015: $121,905 in Conservation Futures funds, reallocated from the completed Auburn West.Hill
Lake Open Space Conservation Futures project, are added to the Aubum Les Gove Addition
Conservation Futures project to help meet a funding shortfall.
City of Auburn Les Gove Pazk Expansion 546,906
Amendment D
CFI'Imerlucal Aubum—King Coun y
2014&2015 CFT proceeds
4
DI.B Page 10 of 21
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Council Discussion on Pro/Con of the Study Session
Format (30 Minute Presentation/45 min Q&A)
Date:
January 21, 2016
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
pro/con list
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Hinman
Meeting Date:January 25, 2016 Item Number:DI.D
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.D Page 11 of 21
PROs/CONs for Change to Council Study Session Format
Study Session Purpose Summary: The purpose of a City Council study session is to
provide a forum for information sharing and discussion on topics or issues that the City
Council or Mayor believes there should be in depth information and warrants gathering
and discussion on before the council takes any action. Issues should be substantive in
nature and should be related to future policy-making, strategic planning or key regional,
state or federal issues related to future policy-making or current or future budgeting.
Pros
· Reinforces City Council’s “Board of Directors’ responsibilities and helps to reinforce
and respect the lines between the policy and financial functions of Council and the
administrative functions of City Administration.
· Increases transparency in the governmental process by providing a single forum for
discussion of key policy issues or topics.
· Reduces limitations on public access and information distribution to Council
proceedings. Some of the committees meeting during or meet immediately following
normal work hours (i.e. 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) making it difficult for interested
citizens to attend committee meetings.
· Forces Council to keep on-topic and reduces the potential for off-topic
conversations.
· Reinforces and enhances the advisory relationship between City Council and its
advisory boards and commissions by having recommendations flow through to the
entire Council at the same time for joint consideration.
· Provides Council with the opportunity to talk jointly about issues without fear of
violation of the Open Public Meetings Act.
· Provides opportunity for more focused conversation on key policy issues amongst
Council.
· Assures that information is distributed more equally among Councilmembers.
· Allows all Councilmembers to hear the same information at the same time.
· Allows for Councilmembers to discuss amongst themselves the issues and topics
before them and learn from each other – and be aware of each other’s positions
[both positive and negative], questions or suggestions - in the same forum.
· Improves the efficiency of staff work by allowing staff to present jointly and uniformly
to the entire City Council.
· Reduces workload demands on staff by not having to prepare for and attend one or
more City Council Committee meetings.
· Reduce the administrative burden and costs on the City Clerk and Department
administrative staff to support the Council Committees process (e.g. 1.25 FTE
equivalent in Community Development and Public Works).
DI.D Page 12 of 21
· Reduces the breadth to some extent of the current subject matter that Council
Committees cover.
· May increase excitement and passion in some Councilmembers for the job of
Councilmember because of the increased focus on major city-wide policy matters.
· May increase teamwork among Councilmembers in that more of what is done would
be done by the whole City Council.
· Decreased printing costs – elimination of duplicate paperwork for multiple
Committees.
Cons
· Reduces the breadth to some extent of the current subject matter that Council
Committees cover.
· Reduces Council’s direct oversight over some of the City’s more administrative
functions.
· Based on the different personalities of Councilmembers and comfort in speaking in
larger groups, it may be harder, at least initially, for some Councilmembers to
participate in the larger group study sessions, when compared with the three-person
committees.
· Potential reduction in some Councilmembers’ passion (s) because of reduced ability
to display expertise in a particular subject matter.
· Will create short-term challenges in understanding and implementing changes in
roles and responsibilities during the transition period.
· Will reduce Council’s ability to “dabble” in a subject matter that is not substantive in
nature and does not have a current or future policy relationship.
DI.D Page 13 of 21
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Council Retreat Goals (5 Minute Presentation/10 Minute
Q&A)
Date:
January 21, 2016
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
City of Auburn Strategic Planning Report
Budget Impact:
$0
Administrative Recommendation:
Background Summary:
A review of the City Council goals for 2016 that came out of the November 2015
retreat.
Reviewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Hinman
Meeting Date:January 25, 2016 Item Number:DI.E
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINEDDI.E Page 14 of 21
www.mktg-solutions.com
914 164th Street SE, #400 I Mill Creek, WA 98012 P 425.337.1100
Strategic Planning Report
November 4, 2015
Prepared by
City of Auburn
www.mktg-solutions.com
DI.E Page 15 of 21
Bug City of Auburn/Retreat Report Page I 1
City of Auburn Retreat Report
October 29‐30, 2015
SWOT Analysis
Strengths
> Strong financial foundation (29)
> Geographic location (road and river intersections) (25)
> Great leadership (Mayor, Council, directors, staff) (21)
> Outstanding City services (12)
> Great parks and entertainment (9)
> Collaborative culture with key stakeholders (4)
> Pride in our community (1)
> Defined downtown (0)
> Great regional relationships (0)
> Safe community via public safety (0)
Weaknesses
> Limited revenue options (34)
> Lack of long‐term planning with key stakeholder (14)
> Citizens low esteem of City (13)
> Lack of diversity among decision makers (11)
> Constraints on resources and time (9)
> Don’t promote our story (7)
> Adverse City culture (5)
> Under developed of post‐secondary education (4)
> Lack of follow through on property management (3)
> Public misperception‐ role of government (2)
Opportunities
> Emerging industry cluster (20)
> Ample warehouse/property (underutilized) (19)
> Emerging infrastructure technology (15)
> We have a diverse culture (13)
> Annexation potential (11)
DI.E Page 16 of 21
Bug City of Auburn/Retreat Report Page I 2
> Citizens willing to engage (8)
> Higher education locating here (6)
> Public culture of giving (5)
> Globalization (3)
> Local supply chain (3)
Threats
> Suburbanization of poverty (34)
> Legislation and regulation (27)
> Empty store fronts (11)
> Transportation limitation (10)
> Limited developable property (6)
> Economic downturn (6)
> LID impact on City
> Gang violence (4)
> Natural disasters (2)
> Potential for litigation (1)
Evaluation
Pros
> Good start/end time
> Good structure and flow & dots
> Working with all the directors
(collaboration)
> Inspiring, love working with the
Council
> Every voice was heard
> Like the kinetic exercises
> Directors participated and got to
vote
> Work was posted
> Good facilitation
> Parking lot flip chart
> No weed whacking
Cons
> Coffee grounds, no coffee
> Too much content from facilitation
> Parking at facility
> Started too early brainstorming
DI.E Page 17 of 21
Bug City of Auburn/Retreat Report Page I 3
Parking Lot
> Police recruiting and process
> More valid metric/measurement for homelessness
> Assure performance management process‐dashboard reporting
DI.E Page 18 of 21
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
M
a
t
r
i
x
G1
/
S
1
:
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
l
i
f
e
s
t
y
l
e
f
o
r
al
l
a
g
e
s
(
2
5
)
G1
/
S
2
:
C
r
e
a
t
e
a
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
p
r
e
v
e
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
an
d
o
n
‐
g
o
i
n
g
h
e
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
(
1
4
)
G1
/
S
3
:
P
r
o
v
i
d
e
f
u
l
l
s
p
e
c
t
r
u
m
o
f
me
n
t
a
l
h
e
a
l
t
h
a
n
d
s
o
c
i
a
l
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
re
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
.
(
9
)
G1
/
S
4
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
h
e
a
l
t
h
y
a
c
c
e
s
s
i
b
l
e
ho
u
s
i
n
g
s
t
o
c
k
(
1
1
)
G1
/
S
1
/
I
1
:
O
b
t
a
i
n
b
u
y
i
n
f
r
o
m
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
Jr
.
C
i
t
y
C
o
u
n
c
i
l
,
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
g
r
o
u
p
s
an
d
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
e
s
(
6
)
G1
/
S
2
/
I
1
C
o
n
v
e
n
e
g
r
o
u
p
o
f
l
e
a
d
e
r
s
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
a
p
p
r
o
p
r
i
a
t
e
o
u
t
r
e
a
c
h
&
h
o
w
to
a
p
p
l
y
(
m
e
d
i
u
m
s
?
)
(
2
)
G1
/
S
3
/
I
1
:
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
E
x
p
l
o
r
e
C
i
t
y
le
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
'
s
o
v
e
r
a
l
l
p
h
i
l
o
s
o
p
h
y
o
n
is
s
u
e
s
(
6
)
G1
/
S
4
/
I
1
:
E
n
g
a
g
e
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
a
n
d
ot
h
e
r
s
t
a
k
e
h
o
l
d
e
r
s
e
.
g
.
‐
Ho
m
e
l
e
s
s
n
e
s
s
T
a
s
k
F
o
r
c
e
G1
/
S
1
/
I
2
:
C
r
e
a
t
e
e
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(
3
)
G1
/
S
2
/
I
2
:
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
w
i
t
h
pr
o
v
i
d
e
r
s
(
5
)
G1
/
S
3
/
I
2
:
E
x
p
l
o
r
e
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
e
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
de
l
i
v
e
r
y
m
o
d
e
l
s
(
1
)
G1
/
S
4
/
I
2
:
D
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
C
i
t
y
l
e
a
d
e
r
s
h
i
p
ph
i
l
o
s
o
p
h
y
a
n
d
b
u
d
g
e
t
i
n
g
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
(4
)
G1
/
S
1
/
I
3
:
R
o
l
l
o
u
t
n
e
i
g
h
b
o
r
h
o
o
d
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
(
0
)
G1
/
S
2
/
I
3
:
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
h
e
a
l
t
h
c
a
r
e
in
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
w
i
t
h
t
h
e
c
i
t
y
(
1
)
G1
/
S
3
/
I
3
:
R
e
v
i
e
w
b
u
d
g
e
t
p
r
i
o
r
i
t
i
e
s
t
o
de
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
n
e
e
d
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
fu
n
d
i
n
g
&
s
o
u
r
c
e
s
(
2
)
G1
/
S
4
/
I
3
:
C
r
e
a
t
e
h
o
u
s
i
n
g
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
an
d
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
a
p
p
r
o
a
c
h
e
s
a
n
d
m
e
t
r
i
c
s
(2
)
G1
/
S
1
/
I
4
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
o
p
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
f
o
r
he
a
l
t
h
y
f
o
o
d
c
h
o
i
c
e
s
.
G
r
o
w
l
o
c
a
l
b
u
y
lo
c
a
l
(
1
)
G1
/
S
2
/
I
4
:
L
o
b
b
y
f
o
r
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
i
v
e
su
p
p
o
r
t
r
e
f
o
r
m
o
f
p
u
b
l
i
c
h
e
a
l
t
h
(
2
)
G1
/
S
3
/
I
4
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
ca
m
p
a
i
g
n
t
o
r
e
m
o
v
e
"
s
t
i
g
m
a
"
(
0
)
G1
/
S
3
/
I
5
:
L
o
b
b
y
l
e
g
i
s
l
a
t
u
r
e
(
c
o
u
n
t
y
‐
st
a
t
e
‐
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
)
f
o
r
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
u
n
d
i
n
g
an
d
r
e
f
o
r
m
(
2
)
G1
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
"
H
e
a
l
t
h
y
C
i
t
y
"
I
n
d
e
x
b
y
%
b
y
2
0
2
0
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
I
n
c
.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
‐
1
DI
.
E
Pa
g
e
1
9
o
f
2
1
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
M
a
t
r
i
x
G2
/
S
1
:
E
x
p
l
o
r
e
t
h
e
es
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
e
n
t
o
f
a
n
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
ut
i
l
i
t
y
(
8
)
G2
/
S
2
:
L
e
v
e
r
a
g
e
p
u
b
l
i
c
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
y
i
n
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
t
o
ac
h
i
e
v
e
c
y
b
e
r
‐
e
q
u
i
t
y
w
i
t
h
i
n
th
e
c
i
t
y
(
2
5
)
G2
/
S
3
:
B
u
i
l
d
p
a
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
f
o
r
re
v
e
n
u
e
s
t
r
e
a
m
s
a
n
d
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
e
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
(
2
6
)
G2
/
S
4
:
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
m
i
n
i
m
u
m
ac
c
e
p
t
a
b
l
e
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
s
p
e
e
d
,
se
c
u
r
i
t
y
a
n
d
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
e
x
p
o
s
u
r
e
(2
)
G2/S5: Expand services to
ca
p
t
u
r
e
e
m
e
r
g
i
n
g
opportunities (11)
G2
/
S
1
/
I
1
:
R
e
s
e
a
r
c
h
a
n
d
an
a
l
y
z
e
o
t
h
e
r
s
u
c
c
e
s
s
f
u
l
ex
a
m
p
l
e
s
(
7
)
G2
/
S
2
/
I
1
:
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
a
v
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
in
f
r
a
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
(
l
o
c
a
l
,
un
i
v
e
r
s
a
l
,
e
t
c
.
)
(
1
1
)
G2
/
S
3
/
I
1
:
I
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
c
u
r
r
e
n
t
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
(
4
)
G2
/
S
4
/
I
1
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
n
e
e
d
s
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
(
1
0
)
G2/S5/I1: Assess emerging
te
c
h
n
o
l
o
g
i
e
s
(
1
)
G2
/
S
1
/
I
2
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
c
o
s
t
be
n
e
f
i
t
a
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
3
)
G2
/
S
2
/
I
2
:
A
s
s
e
s
s
o
p
t
i
o
n
s
a
n
d
op
p
o
r
t
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
(
0
)
G2
/
S
3
/
I
2
:
R
e
a
c
h
o
u
t
t
o
cu
r
r
e
n
t
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
(
2
)
G2
/
S
4
/
I
2
:
D
e
f
i
n
e
d
e
l
i
v
e
r
y
me
t
h
o
d
s
(
W
i
‐
F
i
v
s
.
W
i
r
e
d
)
(
1
)
G2/S5/I2: Engage public to
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
n
e
e
d
s
(
4
)
G2
/
S
1
/
I
3
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
(
1
)
G2
/
S
2
/
I
3
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
l
e
g
a
l
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
(
1
)
G2
/
S
3
/
I
3
:
F
o
r
m
a
l
i
z
e
pa
r
t
n
e
r
s
h
i
p
s
(
l
a
t
h
e
r
,
r
i
n
s
e
,
re
p
e
a
t
)
(
3
)
G2
/
S
4
/
I
3
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
l
i
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
as
s
e
s
s
m
e
n
t
(
1
)
G2/S5/I3: Perform viability and cost assessment (4)
G2
/
S
1
/
I
4
:
A
s
s
e
s
s
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
e
(
1
)
G2
/
S
2
/
I
4
:
P
e
r
f
o
r
m
g
a
p
an
a
l
y
s
i
s
(
0
)
G2
/
S
4
/
I
4
:
A
c
c
e
s
s
r
e
g
u
l
a
t
o
r
y
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
,
p
u
b
l
i
c
a
c
c
e
p
t
a
n
c
e
an
d
p
o
l
i
t
i
c
a
l
r
e
a
l
i
t
y
(
0
)
G2/S5/I4: Develop process for
in
t
e
g
r
a
t
i
o
n
(
m
a
i
n
t
e
n
a
n
c
e
,
su
s
t
a
i
n
a
b
i
l
i
t
y
,
b
u
d
g
e
t
,
e
t
c
.
)
(2
)
G2
/
S
1
/
I
5
:
P
r
e
p
a
r
e
c
a
m
p
a
i
g
n
(1
)
G2
/
S
4
/
I
5
:
E
s
t
a
b
l
i
s
h
o
p
e
r
a
t
i
n
g
st
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
(
0
)
G2
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
I
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
A
c
c
e
s
s
t
o
A
c
h
i
e
v
e
D
i
g
i
t
a
l
P
a
r
i
t
y
b
y
%
b
y
20
2
0
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
I
n
c
.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
‐
2
DI
.
E
Pa
g
e
2
0
o
f
2
1
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
u
b
u
r
n
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
M
a
t
r
i
x
G
3
/
S
1
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
a
n
d
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
f
o
r
f
u
t
u
r
e
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
g
r
o
w
t
h
(
3
1
)
G3
/
S
2
:
E
x
p
l
o
r
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
d
p
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
to
o
l
s
a
n
d
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
s
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
a
n
d
re
t
a
i
n
m
i
d
d
l
e
i
n
c
o
m
e
j
o
b
s
(
1
9
)
G3
/
S
3
:
H
a
v
e
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
e
r
v
i
c
e
s
a
n
d
ro
a
d
s
t
o
r
e
a
c
h
e
m
p
l
o
y
m
e
n
t
c
e
n
t
e
r
s
(2
)
G3
/
S
4
:
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
H
.
E
a
n
d
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
f
o
r
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
l
i
v
i
n
g
o
r
wo
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
A
u
b
u
r
n
(
2
0
)
G3
/
S
4
/
I
1
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
i
n
v
e
n
t
o
r
y
o
f
av
a
i
l
a
b
l
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
i
e
s
i
n
c
l
u
d
i
n
g
f
o
r
an
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
,
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
re
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
(
1
)
G3
/
S
3
/
I
1
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
c
a
s
h
f
l
o
w
n
e
e
d
s
re
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
s
t
s
t
o
de
f
r
a
y
/
d
e
l
a
y
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
c
o
s
t
s
(
0
)
G3
/
S
4
/
I
1
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
r
e
g
i
o
n
a
l
t
r
a
n
s
i
t
s
an
d
u
s
e
r
g
r
o
u
p
s
,
i
.
e
.
M
I
T
,
b
u
s
i
n
e
s
s
,
sc
h
o
o
l
s
,
s
e
n
i
o
r
s
(
4
)
G3
/
S
5
/
I
1
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
t
o
id
e
n
t
i
f
y
t
h
e
i
r
w
o
r
k
f
o
r
c
e
s
k
i
l
l
s
,
n
e
e
d
s
an
d
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
1
1
)
G3
/
S
4
/
I
2
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
C
h
a
m
b
e
r
Ec
o
n
o
m
i
c
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
B
o
a
r
d
a
n
d
bu
s
i
n
e
s
s
c
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
y
t
o
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
po
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
(
7
)
G3
/
S
3
/
I
2
:
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
pr
o
g
r
a
m
s
u
n
d
e
r
s
t
a
t
e
l
a
w
(
5
)
G3
/
S
4
/
I
2
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
,
s
t
a
t
e
an
d
c
o
u
n
t
y
f
o
r
r
o
a
d
i
m
p
r
o
v
e
m
e
n
t
pr
o
j
e
c
t
s
(
6
)
G3
/
S
5
/
I
2
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
k
‐
1
2
a
n
d
h
i
g
h
e
r
ed
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
c
u
r
r
i
c
u
l
u
m
t
o
ma
t
c
h
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
r
s
s
k
i
l
l
s
,
n
e
e
d
s
a
n
d
re
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
s
(
0
)
G3
/
S
2
/
I
3
:
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
a
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
s
t
r
a
t
e
g
y
to
a
d
v
e
r
t
i
s
e
t
h
e
C
i
t
y
:
i
.
e
.
‐
b
i
l
l
b
o
a
r
d
s
,
TV
,
r
a
d
i
o
,
i
n
t
e
r
n
e
t
(
0
)
G3
/
S
3
/
I
3
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
f
e
d
e
r
a
l
a
n
d
st
a
t
e
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
s
t
o
i
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
/
e
x
p
a
n
d
.
Cr
e
a
t
e
i
n
c
e
n
t
i
v
e
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
s
‐
i
.
e
.
T
I
F
(
7
)
G3
/
S
5
/
I
3
:
P
r
o
m
o
t
e
e
m
p
l
o
y
e
e
s
‐
em
p
l
o
y
e
r
i
n
t
e
r
a
c
t
i
o
n
v
i
a
j
o
b
f
a
i
r
s
,
so
c
i
a
l
m
e
d
i
a
,
e
t
c
.
f
o
r
p
e
o
p
l
e
li
v
i
n
g
/
w
o
r
k
i
n
g
i
n
A
u
b
u
r
n
(
1
)
G3
/
S
2
/
I
4
:
B
e
n
c
h
m
a
r
k
a
n
d
i
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
co
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
o
n
(
0
)
G3
/
S
2
/
I
5
:
W
o
r
k
w
i
t
h
c
o
u
n
t
i
e
s
a
n
d
ci
t
i
z
e
n
g
r
o
u
p
t
o
e
x
p
l
o
r
e
a
n
n
e
x
a
t
i
o
n
s
(2
)
G3
:
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
M
i
d
d
l
e
I
n
c
o
m
e
J
o
b
s
b
y
%
b
y
2
0
2
0
Ma
r
k
e
t
i
n
g
S
o
l
u
t
i
o
n
s
,
I
n
c
.
S
t
r
a
t
e
g
i
c
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
R
e
p
o
r
t
A
‐
3
DI
.
E
Pa
g
e
2
1
o
f
2
1