Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-06-2016 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PACKETThe City of Auburn Planning Commission is an eight member advisory body that provides recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the preparation of and amendments to land use plans and related codes such as zoning. Planning Commissioners are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Actions taken by the Planning Commission are not final decisions; they are in the form of recommendations to the City Council who must ultimately make the final decision. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING December 6, 2016 AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER – 7:00 p.m., City Hall Annex Conference Room 2, 1 East Main Street, 2nd Floor, Auburn. a). ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM b). PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. APROVAL OF MINUTES A. November 9, 2016 – Special Work Session Minutes B. November 9, 2016 – Regular Meeting Minutes Minutes III. PUBLIC COMMENT Comment from the audience on any item not listed on the agenda for discussion or public hearing. IV. PUBLIC HEARING No items were brought forward for public hearing. V. OTHER BUSINESS A. Open Space Zoning District: Background, Options, and Recommendations* (Tate) Summary: Planning Commission to discuss Open Space Zoning District background, options and recommendations. B. All Temporary Uses and Mobile Vending Uses (e.g. Food Trucks)* (Teague) Summary: Planning Commission to discuss All Temporary Uses and Mobile Vending Uses (e.g. Food Trucks). VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT Update on Planning and Development Department activities. VII. ADJOURNMENT DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION November 9, 2016 SPECIAL WORK SESSION MINUTES I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Judi Roland called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. in Annex Conference Room 2, located at 1 East Main Street, Auburn, Washington. a.) ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM Planning Commission Members present were: Chair Judi Roland, Vice-Chair Copple, Commissioner Stephens, Commissioner Shin, Commissioner Lee, Commissioner Moutzouris, and Commissioner Smith. Commissioners Mason was excused. Staff present included: City AttorneyDoug Ruth, Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon, Senior Planner Thaniel Gouk, Finance Analyst Consuelo Rogel, and Community Development Office Assistant Jennifer Oliver. Members of the public present: Lisa Tylor, Supervisor of Budget/Fiscal Planning, Kent School District. b.) PLEDGE OF ALLEGENCE II. 2016 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (Case No. CPA16-0001) ManagerJeff Dixon reviewed the docket and provided an overview of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments listed below and reviewed the background and supporting documents provided for the amendments. 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments  P/T #1 – Auburn School District 2016-2022 Capital Facilities Plan  P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022  P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan  P/T #4 – Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan  P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan After providing background information on the 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments and reviewing the materials provided the Commission and staff discussed the Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan and their increase in the Multifamily Dwelling Unit School Impact Fee. PLANNING COMMISSION SPECIAL WORK SESSION MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 2 2. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments  CPM#2- Request by Romart Investments LLC to amend the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. The vacant property is located northwest of the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway SE and 182nd Avenue E (east of Lakeland Hills South area, at the southeast corner of the city). Parcel #: 0520101045 The Commission and staff discussed the standards relating to the roadway and driveway standards on this property should this amendment be approved. Staff explained that Pierce County would be analyzing the location of the driveway as they had previously approved conditions on this property. The Commission and staff discussed the classification of the roadway and that the jurisdiction of 182nd Ave. E is in Pierce County’s jurisdiction.  CPM#4 - City initiated request to amend the map designation of three parcels totaling approx. 144.6 acres from “light Industrial” and “Insitutional” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115. A discussion was held regarding the traffic in the area of C Street SW and 15th Street SW and if there would be road improvements made as development increases and these proposals are approved. Staff explained that as these properties are currently developed and if and when rezoning takes place further traffic studies would be completed based on the uses and then improvements would be required to maintain consistency with the city’s adopted level of service standard for the operation of those roadways and intersections. The Commission had no further questions. III. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission for the Special Work Session, Chair Roland adjourned the special work session at 6:44 p.m. DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION November 9, 2016 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES REGULAR MEETING I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Roland called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in Annex Conference Room 2, located at 1 East Main Street, Auburn, Washington. a.) ROLL CALL/ESTABLISHMENT OF QUORUM Planning Commission Members present were: Chair Judi Roland, Vice-Chair Copple, Commissioner Stephens, Commissioner Shin, Commissioner Moutzouris, and Commissioner Smith. Commissioners Mason and Lee were excused. Staff present included: Assistant City Attorney Doug Ruth, Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon, Senior Planner Thaniel Gouk, Finance Analyst Consuelo Rogel, and Community Development Office Assistant Jennifer Oliver. Members of the public present: Lisa Tylor, Supervisor of Budget/Fiscal Planning, Kent School District; Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster, Federal Way Public Schools; Assistant Director of Capital Projects Bob Kenworthy, Auburn Public Schools; Andrew Dunloy; Bryan Rivera; Cindy Luther; Merjie Bowen; Kim Savage; Cheryl Ebsworth of Apex Engineering; Joel Parsons of Riverton Contractors; Allan Vann; Sophie Solomon; Melissa Torres; Leslie Turner; Paulette Boorpman. b.) PLEDGE OF ALLEGENCE II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. October 4, 2016 The Commission asked staff to clarify the Commissioner who seconded the motion to approve the August 16, 2016 minutes as noted in the October 4, 2016 Approval of Minutes. Commissioner Copple moved and Commissioner Stephens seconded to approve the October 4, 2016 minutes as corrected. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0 III. PUBLIC COMMENT There were no comments from the public. IV. PUBLIC HEARING A. C-1, Light Commercial Zoning District Senior Planner Thaniel Gouk provided background information on the proposed amendments to the allowed residential uses within the C-1, Light commercial zoning district. Staff explained the affected types of residential uses included in the City Council enacted Moratorium and pointed out that neither the moratorium nor the proposed code amendments would impact existing PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 2 single-family homes, or transient-style uses (i.e., hotels, motels). Staff reviewed the proposed updates and reported that in the previous discussion with the Commission, the Commission recommended that “live-work” units be proposed to be prohibited, and “work-live” units be proposed to be Permitted in the C-1 zone because the greater proportion of the use is “commercial”. This update was included. With no questions from the Commission to staff, Chair Roland opened the public hearing on File No. ZOA16-0005 – C-1, Light Commercial Zoning District code amendments at 7:10 PM. Chair Roland invited members of the public forward for public comment on ZOA16-0005. Brian Riviera of Auburn, Washington Mr. Riviera stated that that a portion of the land being proposed in the rezone is designated as wetlands with a conservation value by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife. He is concerned that the studies noted in the environmental checklist application are from 2008 rather than the studies provided in the later years from 2013 and later. It is his belief that if current studies were used it may further protect and conserve the property. He expressed that there are a large number of trees that he hates to see these removed and requests the Commission consider the impact of not only businesses and traffic but also the entire ecosystem. Staff expressed appreciation for Mr. Riviera’s comments and clarified they believe the property discussed in Mr. Riviera’s comments pertain to the subsequent, specific item on the Agenda, IV.B. a private application. With no other comments from the public, Chair Roland closed the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. and opened deliberations. Commissioner Shin moved and Commissioner Smith seconded to recommend approval of ZOA16-0005, The C-1, Light Commercial Zoning District code amendments as presented and forwarding it to City Council for approval. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0 B. 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon reviewed the background of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Auburn. The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. Manager Dixon reviewed the following amendments for Public Hearing, five (5) text amendments and two (2) map amendments. He noted that the Planning Commission had previously held a public hearing on June 21, 2016 on a private map amendment and no further action on this one items is required by the Planning Commission. Staff is recommending Planning Commission action is incorporation of the annual Comprehensive Plan Text amendments P/T #1 to #5 and CPM#2 and #4 into the City’s Comprehensive Plan: 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments Manager Jeff Dixon provided an overview of the Policy/Text Amendments #1 through #4. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 3 Chair Roland stated in consideration of the school district representatives who are attending for comment on their Capital Facilities plans the items will be taken out of order.  P/T #4 – Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan Chair Roland opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. on CPA16-0001, P/T #4 Lisa Tylor, Budget Coordinator, Kent School District Ms. Tylor stated she represents the Kent School district and the amount of property that overlaps the Kent School District and the City of Auburn is a small amount. The district does not typically collect impact fees from the City of Auburn since the property is not developed and the city of Kent is not aware of any current development. Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon reported that there is future potential development proposed to the former drive-in theater property located near the Kent boundary. Ms. Tylor reported the Multiple Family school impact fee has increased $47.00 to $2,210.00, the Single Family impact fee proposal increased $110.00 for the amount of $5,100.00. Kent will be experiencing small improvements and the addition of two new elementary schools. With no other comments from the public, Chair Roland closed the public hearing at 7:41 p.m. on CPA16-0001, P/T #4 and opened deliberations. Vice-Chair Copple moved and Commissioner Moutzouris seconded to recommend inclusion of CPA16-0001, P/T #4, the Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0  P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan Chair Roland opened the public hearing on CPA16-0001, P/T #5 at 7:40 p.m. Bob Kenworthy, Assistant Director of Capital Projects for the Auburn School District, 915 4TH St. SE, Auburn, Washington. Mr. Kenworthy stated the Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering 2017-2022. The CFP was adopted by the Auburn School District School Board on June 13, 2016. The district-wide facility improvements project funded by the 2009 capital levy, is finally nearing completion as is the replacement of Auburn High School. The district has had an increase of 40 portable classrooms over the last 3 years while waiting for bond funding for facilities expansion completions. The district is optimistic of the outcome of the vote on the bond proposition. They are hopeful that the remaining votes will be counted to continue to move the district to a positive direction. The current approval rate is at 60.33%, 60% is needed for approval but votes are still being counted. Mr. Kenworthy discussed the various projections included within the 6-year window for the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan. A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 4 the fee obligations. The fee for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,469.37, an increase of $138.49 and for multiple-family dwellings the requested fee is $1,639.70, a decrease of $985.31. Chair Roland closed the public hearing for P/T #5, CPA16-0001, City of Auburn 2017- 2022 Capital Facilities Plan at 7:48 p.m. and opened deliberations. Commissioner Moutzouris moved and Commissioner Copple seconded to recommend inclusion of P/T #5, CPA16-0001, Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017- 2022, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 5-0 (Commissioner Shin recused himself from voting as his firm provides legal services for the Auburn School District)  P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan Chair Roland opened the public hearing on CPA16-0001, P/T #3, Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan at 7:49 p.m. Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster, Federal Way Public Schools Ms. Nascimento stated that approximately 474 of 23,000 students reside within the Auburn city limits. Meredith Hills Elementary, located in Auburn, serves approximately 523 preschool to 5th grade students. This is the only school located in the City of Auburn. Based on the current program configurations Meredith Hill Elementary is over capacity. Two new single- family communities are being constructed, with approximately 97 new single-family homes. Ms. Nascimento discussed the various projections included within the Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The fee for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,198.00, an increase of $299.00 and for multiple-family dwellings the requested fee is $8,386.00, an increase of $7,880.00. The significant increase in multi-family dwellings is due to the increase of units which increased the student generation rates from .162 to 1.0781, an increase the district did not foresee. The district does not expect to see any multi-family within the City of Auburn for the Federal Way School District. Chair Roland closed the public hearing for P/T #3, CPA16-0001, P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan at 7:55 p.m. and opened deliberations. Vice-Chair Copple moved and Commissioner Smith seconded to recommend inclusion of CPA16-0001, P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0  P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon stated that the Dieringer School District has a very small area within the City of Auburn, it is a small district overall. The impact fees for this calendar year are not requested to change. The fee for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,330.00, no changes were requested; for the multiple-family dwellings the requested fee is $1,518.00, no changes were requested. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 5 Chair Roland opened the public hearing on CPA16-0001, P/T #2, Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 at 7:56 p.m. With no public present for comment, Chair Roland closed the public hearing on CPA16- 90001, P/T #2, Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 at 7:56 p.m. Vice-Chair Copple moved and Commissioner Stephens seconded to recommend inclusion of CPA16-0001, P P/T #2, Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0  P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon P/T amendment #5 is to incorporate the City’s six-year Capital Facilities Plan for the period of 2017 to 2022 into the City’s Capital Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan. Chair Roland opened the public hearing on P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan at 8:22 p.m. Consuelo Rogel, Financial Analyst for the City of Auburn Finance Department Ms. Rogel stated the City of Auburn 2017-2022 proposed Capital Facilities Plan amendments which include projects that have been added, removed or revised from the previous year’s CFP (2016-2021) have been reviewed at Study Session by City Council and the City’s Department Directors. The Commission asked that if each Department and their projects have been reviewed by the Council at Study Session. Ms. Rogel confirmed. The Commission expressed their appreciation for the clarity in the memorandum showing projects that were removed or revised and the location of the change in the CFP. The Commission and staff discussed the Auburn Way South (SR -164) Sidewalk Improvements and the funding source. With no other public comment, Chair Roland closed the public hearing on CPA16-0001, P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan at 8:40 p.m. Vice-Chair Copple moved and Commissioner Stephens seconded to recommend inclusion of CPA16-0001, P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0 2. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments  CPM#2 - CASE CPA14-0002 Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon stated the proposed amendment consists of a request by Romart Investments LLC to amend the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. The vacant property is located northwest of the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway SE and 182nd Avenue E (east of Lakeland Hills South area, at the southeast corner of the city). PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 6 Chair Roland opened the public hearing on CPM#2 - CASE CAP14-0002 at 7:58 p.m. and pointed out that the testimony provided earlier by Brian Riviera pertained to this proposal. Cheryl Ebsworth, Senior Planner, Apex Engineering, 2601 S 35th St #200, Tacoma Ms. Ebsworth stated she represents Romart Investments LLC. She thanked Mr. Dixon for his work on this project. Ms. Ebsworth displayed an aerial photo map showing the property which was annexed to the City of Auburn from Pierce County in 2005. She stated that the City of Auburn land use Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are met by this proposal. The property is separated from residential developments and keeps incompatible land uses separate and believes this is a good location for this commercial use. Ms. Ebsworth provided an overview of how the project meets the criteria required by the City of Auburn. The Commission and Ms. Ebsworth discussed the soil conditions for future development but explained that this request is for a map amendment only, further studies would be performed prior to additional development taking place. Kim Savage, Apex Engineering, 2601 S 35th St #200, Tacoma Ms. Savage explained that no design has begun on a project, this is for the map amendment but when future design takes place soil conditions would be considered. Andrew Dunlow, Auburn Mr. Dunlow stated 25 percent of the land considered on this project is designated as a valuable habitat to our environment. He stated that although this land has had growth of over 30 years and storm run-off it is still valuable. He expressed his opinion that 3.5 million dollars has been spent to mitigate the improvement of salmon habitat elsewhere in the city and if this map amendment is approved and development takes place, money would be spent to destroy the property only to perform mitigation to improve the habitat again after further destruction and damage is done. Mr. Dunlow stated if they are going to change the map designation they should change it to something more suitable like a parking lot, nursing home or even a strip mall. It appears the approval of this map amendment would not be representing the will or benefit of Auburn for the future. With no further public testimony, Chair Roland closed the public hearing on CPM#2, Case CPA14-0002 at 8:11 p.m. Commissioner Shin stated that he felt the current designation of single-family residential is not appropriate given the location and that the Light Commercial use would be more suited and the adjacent utility easement and adjacent the stormwater retention pond already separate the site He stated this property is isolated from the residential nature of properties to the west. If there are critical areas present, these will be a development constraint that will be evaluated at the time of future development but not at this time. He is in support of this proposal. Commissioner Shin moved and Vice-Chair Copple seconded to recommend moving CPM#2, Case CPA14-0002 forward for to City Council for approval. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES November 9, 2016 Page 7  CPM#4 – CASE CPA16-0002 Mr. Dixon stated the proposed amendment consists of a City initiated request to amend the map designation of three parcels totaling approx. 144.6 acres from “light Industrial” and “Institutional” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115. Chair Roland opened the public hearing on CPM#4 - CASE CAP16-0002 at 8:15 p.m. With no further public testimony, Chair Roland closed the public hearing on CPM#4, Case CPA16-0002 at 8:16 p.m. The Commission and Staff discussed if the buildings in this location could be used as manufacturing. Staff explained that if the Comprehensive Plan designation is changed it would set the stage for a zoning designation to also be changed. The zoning designation establishes the development regulations that apply to the property. Staff believes a designation of heavy commercial would be a more appropriate zoning designation of this property for future development rather than light industrial. Commissioner Moutzouris moved Commissioner Shin seconded to recommend moving CPM#4, Case CPA16-0002 forward for to City Council for approval. MOTION APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY. 6-0 V. OTHER BUSINESS No items were brought forward for “Other Business”. VI. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT Planning Services Manager Jeff Dixon reported that Alexandria Teague was promoted from a Planner position to the Planner II position and the Senior Planner position was recently filled by a former City of Tacoma employee, Dustin Lawrence. Staff is currently working to fill the Planner position. Staff reported that they will be holding a meeting December 6, 2016 for a discussion on zoning code changes relating to implementing the Comprehensive Plan updates. VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Planning Commission, Chair Roland adjourned the meeting at 8:46 p.m. November 2016 1 Memorandum To: Planning Commission Members From: Alexandria Teague, Planner II Community Development Services With support by Lisa Grueter, BERK Consulting Date: November 28, 2016 Re: Open Space Zone: Background, Options, and Recommendations 1.0 Background The City of Auburn adopted a new Comprehensive Plan in 2015 that includes an Open Space future land use designation. The designation is described in the text of the Plan and is depicted on the adopted Future Land Use Map. Open Space is applied to Green River and White River shorelines, wetlands, parks, trails, utilities, and other similar sensitive areas and categories of land uses. Most land that is designated as Open Space is either held in public ownership, already protected as an environmentally sensitive area, or has been permanently dedicated as common space. Exhibit 1. Future Land Use Map Source: City of Auburn, BERK Consulting 2016 AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 2 The Open Space Future Land Use designation requires that a new zone designation be established in the City’s Zoning Ordinance. The Zoning designation will establish the range of allowed uses and the development standards that apply on properties that are designated as Open Space. The adopted Comprehensive Plan Open Space designation purpose, criteria, and policies are listed in the sidebar below. 2.0 Discussion Due to the variety of Open Space designation purposes and potential uses within, there are a number of factors to consider when preparing the zone including intensity of uses, matching the rules to the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, considering how some types of Open Space uses may be addressed in related OPEN SPACE Description - This category shall be applied to areas which are owned by a public entity and managed in a largely undeveloped character. It includes parks, watersheds, shoreline areas, significant wildlife habitats, storm drainage ponds, utility corridors with public access, and areas with significant development restrictions. DESIGNATION C RITERIA 1. Passive parks or undeveloped Parks Department property; 2. Any site containing a significant developmental hazard; or 3. Any site containing open space value suitable for public protection without unduly encroaching on private property rights. IMPLEMENT ING ZONING DESIGNATIONS Open Space POLICIES Policy LU-94. Active parks that provide sports field, activity and community centers, cemetery’s, and public buildings should not be designated as open space. Policy LU-95. Open space lands are primarily designated to provide wildlife and aquatic habitat, flood detention, vegetation and soil preservation, and view shed protection. Land designated as open space may be used for public access to trails, interpretive centers, education opportunities, and other uses and facilities that support the purpose of their designation. Policy LU-96. Increase distribution of open space and increase access to open space amenities throughout Auburn. Policy LU-97. Enhance restoration, preservation and protection of natural resources and critical areas. Policy LU-98. Seek out opportunities to develop recreation and education opportunities on public lands or through public-private partnerships. Policy LU-99. Increase visibility of resources through public information campaigns. Continue to work with regional partners to develop and maintain trail systems that connect Auburn with regional destinations. Policy LU-100. Build on partnerships with school districts to expand public use of school facilities for recreation and exercise, and to improve public access to facilities for this purpose, as appropriate. AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 3 zones (e.g. Institutional), and the type of property ownership and range of activities. Each is highlighted below. 2.1 Intensity of Uses The Open Space designation is applied to uses that can vary in intensity of development, such as trail corridors with paved surfaces or shorelines with trees and vegetation or wetlands. Open Space Zone development standards should address different characteristics and intensities of uses. Active parks, golf courses, and playgrounds are not examples of Open Space. These types of uses are designated as Institutional. 2.2 Policy/Land Use Inconsistency Policy LU-94 indicates cemeteries should not be designated as Open Space. The Auburn Cemetery, Pioneer Cemetery, and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Cemetery are currently designated Open Space on the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. Either the Plan map or the policy should be amended in order to eliminate the inconsistency. Exhibit 2. Auburn Cemetery Vicinity Source: City of Auburn, BERK Consulting 2016 2.3 Parks Parks are generally designated Open Space or Institutional in the Comprehensive Plan land use plan. Reviewing the City’s 2015 Parks, Recreation, Open Space (PROS) Plan, most are classified as Community or Neighborhood Parks. Some relevant definitions in the 2015 PROS plan include:  Active recreation - Predominately muscle-powered activities such as jogging, cycling, field and court sports, etc.; they commonly depend on developed sites.  Passive recreation - activities that require very little use of muscle power, such as nature viewing, photography, or picnicking. AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 4  Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed primarily for non-supervised, non-organized recreation activities. Neighborhood parks are usually small in size (less than five acres) and serve an area of approximately 1/2-mile radius. Since these parks are located within walking and bicycling distance, the activities they offer become a daily pastime for neighborhood children.  A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation opportunities for young people and adults. They often exceed 10 acres in size and may have sports fields, water bodies, gardens, nature trails or similar features as the central focus of the park. Community parks can also provide indoor facilities to meet a wide range of recreation interests. They require more support facilities such as parking and restrooms than neighborhood parks.  Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or land occupied by a specialized facility. Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small landscaped areas, community gardens, streetscapes, Environmental Park, viewpoints, historic sites and other specialized areas. The development of the Open Space zone should allow for parks and recreation uses consistent with the character of the parks and the intended activities in the PROS Plan. Where a park as a whole is both designated Institutional and Open Space the portion that is Open Space should be more characteristic of lands with environmentally sensitive features or that are passive in character. Exhibit 3. Auburn Parks Designated Open Space in Comprehensive Plan Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation 21st Street Playground 405 21st St. SE .17 Playground Neighborhood This small pocket park is situated adjacent to a City stormwater detention pond. Park amenities include a playground, picnic table, and benches. The park is on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process. Institutional 104th Ave SE 14.73 Undeveloped. PROS Plan recommends: Develop Master Plan Community This undeveloped riverside property is comprised of two parcels along the Green River. A nice sandy beach along the Green River is popular for swimmers in the summer, and fishermen in the fall and winter months. Nearly two-thirds of the park is located within the 100- year floodplain so given the location of the park along the river and regulatory constraints, the park will likely be designed as a passive use nature park. Open Space – Western Parcel Institutional – Eastern Parcel [Consider if eastern parcel will be developed or will be passive as noted in the general description and should also be Open Space.] Auburn Environmental Park 413 Western Ave. NW 120 Bird/Wildlife viewing tower Open Space Environmental Park is an outdoor learning area to Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 5 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation observe birds, plants, and other animals in the area. Auburndale 31700 108th Ave. SE 9.64 Playground, trails Neighborhood The main feature of the park is a natural wooded area with a loop trail. There is a play area, picnic tables and barbeque grill. Open Space Auburndale II 29725 118th Ave. SE 9.34 Trails Neighborhood Auburndale II is an undeveloped park with a mix of native overstory, and an understory that is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. A future trail connecting Lea Hill to the valley floor is being considered, which would likely run east to west along the northern boundary of the park. Institutional [Given PROS Plan description and conditions, consider changing to Open Space] B Street Plaza 148 East Main St. 0.10 Special Use Area A small pocket park in downtown Auburn featuring artwork Downtown Urban Center Ballard 1612 37th Way SE 0.66 Picnic, playground, basketball Neighborhood The main feature of the park is a distinctive stone picnic shelter. In 2003, a new playground and irrigation system was installed, as well as pathways and an entrance gate. Ballard Park is situated high above the White River and benefits from an appealing view of the river, although it has no direct river access. Open Space [Given small size and level of development and lack of access to larger natural area, consider changing to Institutional.] Bicentennial 502 Auburn Way S. 1.07 Special Use Area Green open space park at Auburn Way and Hwy 18 Open Space Brannan 1019 28th St. NE 26.63 Baseball, soccer, BBQ, skateboarding, restrooms, playground, river/pond access, trails, basketball Community Brannan Park contains one of Auburn’s most heavily used sports complexes. The City, Schools and a variety of organizations – youth soccer leagues, Little League - also use the playing fields extensively. Brannan Park is on a flat, open site, with the Green River forming the park’s eastern boundary. Open Space [Though the site abuts the Green River, it is a highly developed active park. Consider Institutional.] AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 6 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Cameron 3727 Lemon Tree Lane 3.83 Baseball PROS Plan also lists picnic table, play area, and paved trail. Neighborhood The park is between two housing developments and lies on top of the Northwest Pipeline. It is an open grassy area with a path leading to a playground and picnic tables. Open Space [As the park is combined with a utility purpose, it could retain an Open Space designation.] Cedar Lanes 1002 25th St. SE 8.27 Playground, trails Neighborhood Cedar Lanes Park is a unique combination of native woodland, well-kept lawn, formal playground and a caretaker residence. The forested area contains a mix of deciduous trees. Open Space Centennial Viewpoint 402 Mountain View Dr. 0.7 Scenic overlook, public art Special Use Area Centennial Viewpoint Park was created in 1991, during Auburn’s Centennial year. The park is tucked into a small spot along Mountain View Drive, across the road from Mountain View Cemetery. The park is an attractive and popular spot for impromptu picnic lunch and views of the valley. Open Space Clark Plaza 1420 Auburn Way N. 0.25 Special Use Area Small pocket park at the corner of Auburn Way North and 15th Street NE. Light Commercial Clark Property No Address: PIN 3021059025 26.68 Undeveloped Open Space Forested open space area along the White River Trail, just west of R Street SE. The property is located on both sides of Oravitz Road. Bowman Creek crosses this property along the toe of the slope below Oravetz Road before flowing into the White River Open Space Community Garden A 1030 8th Street NE 1.04 Special Use Open Space Community Garden B Private Property 0.39 Special Use Residential Transition Dorothy Bothell Park 1087 Evergreen Way SE 4 Playground (Aerial shows passive open lawn and trails) Neighborhood Located adjacent to the Lakeland Hill Community Center, Dorothy Bothell Park is a small, attractive Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 7 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation neighborhood park in Lakeland Hills. Dykstra 1487 22nd St. NE 1.78 Playground, river/pond access Neighborhood Dykstra is primarily a playground neighborhood park; its proximity to the river also makes it popular with walkers and wildlife lovers. The park contains many mature trees. Open Space Fenster Nature Park 2033 4th St. NE 12.58 Swimming and tubing access to the Green River, Public fishing access, trail access Special Use Area Access area to the Green River. Open Space Fly-in Lion Special Use Area Forest Villa 1647 Fir St. SE .23 Playground Neighborhood The Forest Villa Park is located on one lot in a single family residential neighborhood. A recently installed play structure is the primary focus of the park. Open Space [Given small size and level of development and lack of access to larger natural area, consider changing to Institutional.] Fulmer 1101 5th St. NE 5.13 Baseball, restrooms, playground Community Fulmer Park is primarily an active sports facility. Institutional Gaines 1008 Pike St. NW 1.34 Playground, river/pond access, trails, basketball Neighborhood This park is a joint project between the Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation. The park has a boardwalk along the wetland area on the east edge of the park. The park has a picnic area, play area, ½ basketball court in addition to the walking trail through the park. Institutional [Given the dual park / stormwater use and wetland it could be considered Open Space. It does have some facilities but they are clustered away from the natural area. It adjoins another Open Space area.] Game Farm 3030 R St. SE 53.0 Baseball, soccer, BBQ, Pickleball courts, restrooms, playground, river/pond access, trails, basketball, picnic shelter, tennis court, sand volleyball courts, horseshoes, rentals Community The park contains a wide variety of facilities for organized sports activities as well as a distinctive natural setting. Institutional [Portion now identified as Game Farm Open Space below.] Game Farm Open Space 26.00 (part of Game Farm above) A trailhead is located off of Forest Ridge Drive SE in the residential development that provides access to an unimproved trail system through a forested area. Open Space Undeveloped forested area located on a plateau in the northeast portion of Game Farm Park. This area overlooks the White River to Institutional [Consider if this portion of the site identified as Open Space in PROS Plan AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 8 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation the east and is bordered by a residential development to the north. should be Open Space.] Game Farm Wilderness 2401 Stuck River Dr. SE 72.0 Restrooms, picnic shelter, river/pond access, trails, rentals, camping Community Game Farm Wilderness Park emphasizes a connection with the natural environment. It has limited development and has preserved most of the native woodland along the White River. Open Space Golf Course 29630 Green River RD SE 148.73 Special Use The Auburn Golf Course is an 18-hole golfing facility located in northeast Auburn, east of the Green River. Institutional [Portion identified as Open Space below.] Golf Course Open Space See above 40.98 (Part of Golf Course above) Undeveloped, power line easement Mostly forested area located on a steep west facing slope along the eastern edge of the golf course. A power line easement runs east west across the northern portion of this area. Institutional [Consider if this portion of the site identified as Open Space in PROS Plan should be Open Space.] GSA Park 413 15th St. SW 6.13 Baseball Community The land for GSA Park was donated to the City by the U.S. General Services Administration. Its location in a heavily trafficked industrial zone has resulted in an atypical park setting. Currently the park has two youth softball/baseball fields, a maintenance building, and dugouts. Institutional Indian Tom Park 1316 6th St. NE .43 Playground Neighborhood This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. It contains a playground installed in 2014, two mature Douglas firs, and two stone monuments. Institutional Isaac Evans 29827 Green River RD SE 19.87 Restrooms, picnic shelter, BBQ, playground, river/pond access, trails, horseshoes, rentals Community Isaac Evans Park is a riverfront park providing valuable passive recreation opportunities for the citizens of Auburn. The park’s connection to Dykstra Park via the suspension bridge increases its accessibility to local residents Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 9 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Jacobsen Tree Farm 29387 132nd Ave. SE PROS Plan notes: Explore funding options to develop the park Community Jacobsen Tree Farm originally operated as a tree farm by the Jacobsen family. It has a variety of evergreen trees and birch trees. The park is owned by the City of Auburn and is currently undergoing a master planning process. Parks staff is currently exploring options to fund the development of the park into a multi-use sports facility. Open Space – South Institutional – North Kersey Way A 5480 Charlotte Ave. SE 2.73 A paved walking trail with picnic tables and benches connects the ball field, to the playground and the basketball court. Neighborhood This park was constructed to meet level of service needs for a neighborhood park within in newly developed Kersey III neighborhood. See facilities at left. Open Space [West side fairly developed, and eastside undeveloped. Consider Institutional designation.] Kersey Way B 1433 U Court. NW 0.79 Half basketball court, small climbing wall, paved trail, benches, picnic tables Neighborhood This park has similar features and amenities as nearby Kersey A, but on a smaller scale. Single Family (Address in Plan appears incorrect) Jornada Park 1433 U Ct. NW 1.89 Picnic tables, trail, playground, basketball Neighborhood This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. It contains a play structure, climbing wall, picnic tables and a loop trail. It adjoins trees. Institutional Lakeland Hills 1401 Evergreen Way SE 5.06 Baseball, restrooms, picnic shelter, BBQ playground, trails, basketball Neighborhood This five-acre park is nestled into a wooded hillside, where many native trees were saved and integrated into the design of the park. The park provides active recreation facilities at a neighborhood scale, and also a paved trail around the circumference of the park. Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 10 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Lakeland Hills Nature Area Located along 182nd Avenue NE 46.07 Undeveloped Open Space Assemblage of parcels located west of Fire Station 33 in the Lea Hill area of the City. The property contains forested wetland areas, but the extent of these areas are currently unknown. This park property will likely be a passive use park with a trail system, but a master plan is needed in order establish near term long term plans for the site. Institutional [Given description of sensitive areas and passive uses. consider redesignating the portion to be reserved as park as Open Space. Fire Station on east would stay Institutional.] Lea Hill 31693 124th Ave. SE 9.0 Restrooms, multi-purpose sport turf, playground, picnic shelter, ballfield, skate spot, half basketball court, public art Community Lea Hill Park appears to have been redeveloped:  Wooden Picnic Shelter reminiscent of a barn  Playground  Amphitheater area  Basketball Court  Skate spot  Small-scale soccer and multipurpose turf field  Public Art  Restroom Open Space [The Park is mostly developed with active facilities. It may be better categorized as Institutional.] Lea Hill Tennis Courts 32121 105th Pl. SE 1.18 Tennis Courts 1/2 court Basketball Special Use Area The Lea Hill Tennis Court is in a unique location on top of a City of Auburn water reservoir. Multifamily Les Gove 910 9th St. SE 20.86 Baseball, soccer, restrooms, Discovery Playground, Bocce Courts, trails, water spray playground, Parks Administration Building, Auburn Senior Activity Center, White River Valley Museum, library, rentals Community Les Gove Park is a recreational and educational facility serving the entire community. The Library, Parks and Recreation Administration Building, Senior Center and White River Valley Museum, and a variety of recreational features make Les Gove a very popular destination. Institutional AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 11 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Mary Olson Farm 28728 Green River RD SE n/a Seven historic buildings, a century-old orchard, a year- round stream with two salmon runs, and extensive pastures and woodlands Special Use Area The City applied for and received King County Conservation Futures funding to purchase the historic Mary Olson Farm in 1993. The funding stipulates that the Farm can be developed for passive recreation and open space use only. Institutional [Given the passive nature of the park, consider designating as Open Space.] Mill Pond 4582 Mill Pond Dr. SE 3.97 River/pond access, trails Community Mill Pond is unique in several ways. The park is a joint project between the Parks and Public Works Departments, the Auburn School District and the developer of Lakeland Hills. The Park provides a recreational experience in a natural setting, and to provide stormwater detention and filtering for a 400 acre area. Institutional [Consider whether as a combination of park and utility with a largely open pond should be in the Open Space designation.] Mountain View Cemetery 2020 Mountain View Dr. 40 Rolling well-kept lawns, landscaped flowering gardens, and other features Special Use Area Mountain View Cemetery is nestled on 55 acres of property overlooking the Mt. Rainier and the Green River Valley. Mountain View was established in 1890, a year before the town of Slaughter (now Auburn) was incorporated. This is the resting place of some of the early pioneers who settled in Washington Territory. The cemetery is a self-supporting municipal cemetery that supports its development, staff and construction phases. Open Space North Tapps Estates Douglas Avenue SE 0.94 Based on aerials, appears to have playground, ballfield and paths. Neighborhood Open Space [With size and developed nature, consider Institutional.] Pioneer Cemetery 8th NE & Auburn Way North n/a Historic site, public artwork Special Use The land was donated in 1878 to the town of Slaughter, Washington Territory, for a cemetery. It was only active for 20 years due to spring flooding. Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 12 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Burials at Pioneer Cemetery are rare, as only cremated remains of descendants who were originally interred there are eligible. The grounds at this historical site are under the care of the Cemetery Division of the Parks Department. Plaza Park 2 West Main St. 0.19 Special Use Area Open Space [Considering size and urban nature, apply Institutional.] Riverpoint 1450 32nd St. NE 3.8 Open Space Play Area, Benches, Access to the Green River Trail Neighborhood Built in 2005, the park is adjacent to the Green River and provides an access point to the Green River Trail. Open Space Riversands 5014 Pike Street NE 1.76 Playground, half basketball court, picnic shelter Neighborhood This park lies along the Green River near the northern City Limits. Visitors can gain direct access from the park to a bridge across the river that connects to the City of Kent’s S. 277th Street Trail (1.1 miles). The future Green River Trail will run along the eastern boundary of the park if the trail is ever extended through Auburn. Open Space Roegner 601 Oravetz Road SE 21.25 Restrooms, picnic shelter, BBQ, playground, river/pond access, trails, rentals Community This community park is located along the banks of the White River, adjacent to Auburn Riverside High School A trail system includes both hard and soft- surfaced sections meets the needs of many different users, including equestrians from the nearby Hidden Valley neighborhood. Open Space Rotary 2635 Alpine St. SE 4.14 Baseball, playground, basketball Neighborhood Though the site has rolling topography, and an unusual shape, and conifers, it has major recreation facilities listed at left. Institutional Scootie Brown 1403 Henry Rd. NE 1.34 Baseball, playground, basketball Neighborhood The park is located at a junction between Institutional AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 13 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation commercial and residential zones. It has a busy, open feel, with minimal landscaping. Shaughnessy 3302 21st St. SE 3.46 Baseball, playground, basketball, tennis Neighborhood Shaughnessy Park is located in an attractive setting of near mature Douglas Firs on a quiet residential street. Several recreational courts are located in close proximity to the street. The play structure is tucked nicely into a stand of trees. There is an open playfield with a backstop. Institutional Slaughter Memorial 2988 Auburn Way N. 0.02 Monument Special Use Area Small pocket park at Auburn Way North with the memorial commemorating the battle of Slaughter Heavy Commercial Sunset 1420 69th St. SE 15 Restrooms, playground, basketball, baseball, skate park, trails, BBQ, picnic shelter, rentals Community The park serves the Lakeland Hills neighborhood but also the community. The site includes a picnic shelter, two youth baseball/softball fields, trails, basketball court and skate park. Institutional Terminal 1292 C St. SE 1.2 Playground, picnic tables Neighborhood Terminal Park is a small park along a quiet residential street. The newly renovated playground at the center of the park is the focal point here. The remainder of the park contains a slightly rolling lawn, with mature trees scattered throughout. Open Space [Given small size and level of development and lack of access to larger natural area, consider changing to Institutional.] West Auburn Lake Property PIN: 9262800105 9.25 A Master Plan was developed for the park in 2013. Future site improvements identified in the Master Plan include a trail around the perimeter of the lake, a parking area at the end of S. 320th Street, viewpoints with benches, invasive species control, and the installation of native plantings. Open Space This property is located at the terminus of S. 320th Street in the West Hill area of Auburn. Access to the site can gained from the west via S 320th Street or from the east via W Street NW. The site contains an approximate 2-acre lake, with approximately 7 acres of mature forested upland area. Open Space AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 14 Park Address Acres Facilities PROS Plan 2015 Category and Information Comp Plan Designation Veterans Memorial 405 E St.NE 7.65 Public building, restrooms, playground, basketball, horseshoes, rentals Community The park is distinctive for its Veterans Memorial structure, shady woods and underlying expanse of green lawn. Open Space Village Square Park 12111 SE 310th St. 1.10 Playground, open play field, picnic area, barbeque grills Neighborhood This is a small pocket park is located in the middle of an apartment complex. The park has a short loop trail with a small grassy area in the middle. Multifamily Source: http://www.auburnwa.gov/things_to_do/parks_trails.htm 2.4 Uses and Ownership There are about 190 properties designated open space, most of which are owned by the City of Auburn. Other public agencies with parcels designated Open Space include King County, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Tacoma Water, Port of Seattle, and Washington State. Regulated utility purveyors also own properties including Puget Sound Energy, Northwest Pipeline, and Olympic Pipeline. Other ownerships include homeowners associations (plat open space), Segale Properties (a portion of the mine along river with split designation), and one private property (split designation, crosses river) as well as riverfront areas associated with subdivisions. Ownerships and uses are identified in the table below. Understanding existing uses will help the formulation of the Open Space zone use allowances. For example, caretakers homes may be allowed where they exist (there is one publicly owned home), but other new homes could be conditionally allowed or prohibited, particularly where a property is split designated (one privately held residential parcel crosses a river and has upland areas designated for residential purposes). The owners of property that will be considered for the implementing Open Space zone will be contacted prior to the hearing for the Open Space Zone and associated mapping. AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 15 Exhibit 4. Open Space Zone Designated Parcels - Ownership Property Use, if Known City of Auburn King County Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Northwest Pipeline Olympic Pipeline (Private) Port of Seattle Puget Sound Energy Tacoma Water Washington State Private Resident Private-Segale Subdivision Tract Riverfront-Subdivision Plat-Open Space 4 Plat-Waterbody 6 Private-Mine-Waterbody 3 Private-Waterbody 1 Public-Cemetery 6 1 Public-Critical Area 17 2 1 Public-House 1 Public-Park 7 Public-ROW 2 Public-Tribal 4 Public-Tribal-Cemetery 1 Public-UGA 4 Public-Unspecified* 76 3 1 1 Public-Utility 3 6 Public-Vacant 22 1 Utility-Private 4 1 4 Utility-Private-Critical Area 1 Utility-Private-ROW 6 Total 138 5 7 4 1 1 11 6 2 1 3 4 6 *Assessor data missing. Most appear to be parkland. Source: King County Assessor, BERK Consulting 2016 3.0 Regulatory Options Examples of Open Space zones from five jurisdictions are listed below. Some communities have a single zone and others have multiple zones that get at the different characteristics of open space – e.g. more natural areas allow fewer uses and more developed sites allow more uses. Some have variable development standards depending on the size and character of the property. It should be noted that Kent, Renton, and Sumner codes were considered and do not have a similar type of Open Space zone (some address agriculture or very low density zones, but not open space zones per se). November 2016 16 Exhibit 5. Example Open Space Zones Community / Zone / Purpose Summary Uses Allowed Height, Setback, Density/Lot, and Coverage Standards City of Airway Heights Open Space Zone  Protect and preserve existing and future areas for civic, cultural, educational and similar facilities;  Provide for the social needs of the community, whether publicly or privately sponsored  Enhance the identity and image of the community as a desirable place  Provide and protect parks, open space and other natural, physical assets of the community.  Uses which provide a public need per the purpose statement (see types of open spaces at left).  Sites designated as the result of a sensitive area designation should only be used for natural resource conservation purposes with associated trails for passive recreation opportunities or as the City deems appropriate  Parks, greenbelts and open space for active or passive recreation or enjoyment  Accessory structures to the open space use (bathrooms, tool sheds, picnic structures or playgrounds)  Parking lots and amphitheaters are permitted uses but do not affect development coverage.  CUP: Wireless telecommunications support towers.  Height: 35 feet  Setbacks: Front: 25 feet, rear 10 feet, side 5 feet, corner 15 feet  Coverage: 10 percent City of DuPont Open Space Zone … recognize those lands which are not intended to be developed due to the presence of wetlands, wetland buffers, steep slopes and other sensitive areas and their buffers … and recognize lands designated for parks, greenbelts, open space and tree preservation areas and regional storm drainage detention areas in addition to open space and landscape areas as mutually agreed to by the property owner and city. … some open spaces are intended to preserve historic and Native American cultural sites. A network of trails is intended to link open spaces … with other community facilities.  Permitted: o Nature preserves. o Historic and cultural preserves. o Interpretative markers for the study and interpretation of natural, historic, and cultural resources. o Uses permitted by the sensitive areas Chapter 25.105 DMC. o Passive recreation when in a park, greenbelt, open space or tree preservation area. o Active recreation when in a park or part of a trail. o Utilities and utility structures and buildings when in a park, greenbelt, landscape area or regional detention facility.  Conditionally Permitted: Utilities, underground or above-ground  Site plan approval is required for all development projects. AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 17 Community / Zone / Purpose Summary Uses Allowed Height, Setback, Density/Lot, and Coverage Standards City of Kenmore Parks Zone: The parks zone provides for parks, recreational, open space, and resource uses within publicly owned lands, and establishes standards that allow for such uses to continue or be established while ensuring compatibility with surrounding uses. Golf Course Zone: The golf course zone provides for golf course activities and the protection and preservation of open space qualities of lands that are developed for golf course uses. The district allows for a mix of active golf-related recreational facilities and supporting infrastructure.  Parks, Open Space & Recreation Facilities: Arboretum, Boat Launch, Clubhouse**, Dock, Driving Range **, Golf Course Facility**, Indoor Recreational Facilities * (excluding sports clubs in Parks), Parks, Open Space*, Outdoor Recreational Facilities*, Trails*, and Wildlife Shelter*  Residential: Caretaker Residence, Accessory*, Dwelling Unit, Single Detached, one single detached dwelling unit per existing legal lot  Institutional/ Infrastructure o City Government Facilities and Offices o Conference Center, Accessory** o Maintenance Facility, Accessory** o Private Stormwater Management Facility* o Utility Facility*  Commercial: Eating and Drinking Places, Accessory**, Mobile Food Vendor, Accessory, Retail Sales, Indoor, Accessory** No symbol: Allowed in Parks zone only. *=Allowed in both Parks and Golf Course Zone. **=Allowed in Golf Course Zone only.  Height: 35 feet (may be increased up to 75 feet if setback 1:1)  Density: 0.10  Minimum lot size: 4,500 SF  Street Setbacks: 0 feet in downtown, 20 feet abutting single family zones, 10 feet otherwise  Interior Side Setback: 20 feet abutting single family zone, 5 feet otherwise  Maximum impervious surface standards: o 100 acres or greater: 5%. o 30 to 100 acres: 10%. o Less than 30 acres: 30%. Puyallup Agriculture, Recreation and Open Space Zone  Areas with significant amounts of existing agricultural uses, open space, and/or critical areas, where the area has not been previously occupied for uses that require large amounts of impervious surfaces or buildings with the potential to be damaged by flooding, and where adequate transportation, water and/or sewer facilities that would be needed to support urban- level densities do not exist  Protect agricultural activities from zoning and nuisance complaints  Recreation: Public parks and open space, trails (with or without parking) o Recreation CUP: Ballfields and play fields not part of a public park, Stables/equestrian schools  Residences: Associated with agriculture, accessory dwellings, home occupations o Residences CUP: Bed and breakfasts  Resource Uses: Agriculture, horticulture/nurseries, animal husbandry, arboretums, produce standards with onsite products o Resource CUP: Accessory restaurants to recreation or agricultural uses (no drive through), roadside standards with products offsite  Utility Facilities: local utilities o Utility CUP: Community facility  Other: Wells, wildlife shelters/refuges o Other CUP: satellite dishes/amateur radio tower, wireless communication facility, offsite or onsite wetland, stream or habitat mitigation  Height: 40 feet  Density: 0.1 dwelling units per acre  Lot Size: 10 acres minimum  Lot Width: 250 feet  Setback State Hwy: 60 feet  Setback Other Roads: 25 feet  Setback Front, Rear, and Side: 30 feet  Maximum impervious: shall not exceed the greater of 5,000 square feet or 5% of any lot, except greenhouses may have 10% AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 18 Community / Zone / Purpose Summary Uses Allowed Height, Setback, Density/Lot, and Coverage Standards City of Vancouver Open Space Districts  Natural Areas District  Greenways District  Park District Open space districts are intended to protect, preserve, conserve, and enhance natural areas, greenways, and parks. Together, the open space districts are intended to provide a full range of passive and active uses as well as environmental protection and enhancement for the future use, understanding, and enjoyment of the City and its residents.  Open Space/Parks/Recreation: o Environmental education, environmental maintenance, wildlife habitat conservation/ maintenance/ restoration, interpretive stations o Interpretive signs o Recreation facilities: Passive facilities, trails o Recreation associated parking (CUP in Natural Area; P in Greenway or Park) o Parks, playgrounds, restrooms (P in Greenway or Park only) o Fill, floodplain, wetland banking and mitigation (CUP in Natural Area; P in Greenway or Park) o Moderate or high impact recreation (CUP in Greenway and P in Park) o Agriculture (P in Greenway or Park only)  Caretaker’s Residences (allowed in Greenways and Parks only)  Utility Facilities: Essential utilities (allowed Greenways and Parks only) o Utility CUP: Minor or major utilities and transportation facilities, wireless communication (Greenways and Parks only)  Other: Family Daycare Home: (allowed Greenway and Park only) o Other CUP: Cemeteries in Park only  Height: 12 feet Natural Areas, 12-35 Feet Greenways, Parks based on most restrictive zoning adjacent to property  Lot Size: 20 acres minimum Greenways  Setback Front, Rear, and Side: 20 feet  Lot Coverage: None in Natural Area, 5% in Greenways, Parks based on most restrictive adjacent district November 2016 19 3.1 Open Space Zone Options for Auburn Based on the discussion of key issues and example zones above, this subsection addresses Open Space zone options for Auburn. Number of Implementing Zones/Allowed Uses The Comprehensive Plan land use designations serve as an umbrella for implementing zoning. There can be a 1:1 match between the Open Space designation and zone (e.g. only one zone implements the land use designation) or there can be multiple zones implementing a single plan designation. A. One Zone: Creation of one Open Space zone implementing the Open Space designation would be simpler from a code length and ease of implementation perspective. However, given the variable nature of underlying uses, it may mean more complex use tables and development standards. Examples of a single zone approach includes Airway Heights, DuPont, and Puyallup. B. Multiple Zones: Creation of multiple zones that reflect different characters of uses. The uses and standards could be more tailored; for example, an Open Space-Natural zone could have fewer uses allowed and very low impervious area, while an Open Space-Services and Utility could allow more uses and impervious area. This multiple zone approach would be more like Vancouver or Kenmore in the examples above. Under either option, use allowances can be performance based as well or reference City functional plans, e.g. parks plan. Some allowance could be made for private uses, but a cap on one home per legal lot or other means of limiting such uses can be included. Intensity of Uses Whether in a single zone or multiple zones, development standards can vary by type of use and sensitivity (e.g. regional trail versus shoreline) or by size of property. This could be particularly important for impervious surface standards and limitations on the alteration of native vegetation given that some sites have environmentally sensitive areas and others are more developed; such as trails on former rail corridors. Intensity limitation options include:  Impervious surface cap like Puyallup; or  Clearing limits like Airway Heights; or  Range of standards like Kenmore depending on size of property. Policy / Land Use Consistency Based on the discussion section above, cemeteries are not appropriately designated as Open Space, but the Comprehensive Plan land use map has designated the three existing cemeteries as open space. Either the policy or map should be amended. Parks The parks included in the Open Space zone appear to be whole or portions of parks that have environmental sensitivity, such as riparian area and wetlands along the river, or that have recreation facilities but fewer structures than other parks. Per Exhibit 3, some parkland may be more suited to Institutional, and some Institutional sites may be more suited to an Open Space designation. For properties classified as Open Space and zoned as such, the City could identify expected park uses and AUBURN OPEN SPACE ZONE November 2016 20 defer development standards to a master plan process; if the PROS Plan update offers some insights into expected uses the zone could refer to the City’s adopted PROS Plan too. 4.0 Questions 1. Should the City create a single Open Space zone or multiple zones? 2. Should the City vary development standards (e.g. impervious area) either by property type or size or sub-zone (if multiple zones)? 3. Should the City amend the policy limiting cemeteries in the Open Space zone or amend the map and make cemeteries institutional? 4. Are parks appropriately identified as Open Space, should some be Institutional, or if already Institutional become Open Space? 5.0 Staff Recommendation A. Single Zone. The Comprehensive Plan already includes a land use designation called “Institutional” which is utilized for active use parks. As a result, staff believes that a single Open Space land use designation would adequately serve Auburn’s open space lands. This approach is more simplified and resulting parcel uses are more straightforward leading to a more user friendly table and development standards. B. Intensity of Uses. The intensity of uses, such as impervious surface and native vegetation retention, could be managed and implemented through percentage limitations. There could be exceptions for features such as public trails and interpretative kiosks. C. Policy/Land Use Consistency. Staff recommends that the Comprehensive Plan land use designation map be amended to designate cemeteries as “Institutional” because cemeteries are heavily altered and do not resemble natural conditions. D. Parks. Parks designated as Open Space should be confirmed and potentially modified per Exhibit 3 through direct coordination with the city’s Parks Department. Allowed uses would address current and planned parks facilities. Development standards could be incorporated for height and impervious area with the ability to seek different standards through a park master plan process or site plan review process. November 2016 1 Memorandum To: Planning Commission Members From: Jeff Tate, Assistant Director of Community and Development Services With support by Jeff Arango, BERK Consulting Date: November 28, 2016 Re: Temporary Uses and Mobile Vending Uses (e.g. Food Trucks) The City’s Community Development Services is requesting that Planning Commission discuss the appropriateness of updating and establishing new regulations for temporary uses and mobile vending uses. This memo provides (1) background information (2) related comprehensive plan policies (3) approaches used in other cities (4) some regulatory options intended to help the Planning Co mmission initiate discussion, (5) some questions to consider for moving forward, and (6) recommendations. 1.0 Background City staff have identified the following issues related to regulating temporary uses and mobile vending: 1. Update and establish new regulations for mobile vending uses (e.g. food trucks) including an option to establish a street use permit to allow food trucks in the public right-of-way. Most inquiries on mobile vending uses pertain to food trucks. While food trucks are the most common type of mobile vending, it is important to note that there are other types. For this reason, staff is suggesting the use of terminology that is more encompassing. There are a variety of manners in which mobile vending uses operate and there are multiple options for how they are permitted or licensed. Currently, the City does not have regulations in place that allow for the placement or endorsement of mobile vending uses. In the absence of anything more specific, the City has utilized the temporary use provisions of Chapter 18.46A of the City code when considering an inquiry or proposal to establish mobile vendors. Furthermore, staff and customers have found the existing temporary use standards and procedures to be more labor intensive, time consuming, and misdirected when applied to requests to establish mobile vendors. This is because the temporary use provisions are directed at events and structures that assume one fixed location. Staff is proposing that provisions be incorporated into City code that are easier to understand, establish a more efficient and responsive decision making process, and that rely more upon the City’s business licensing program than land use permitting. For mobile vendors that are proposed to be placed in a non-residential location for more than one year, adherence to the zoning designation in which it is located is likely more appropriate and eliminate the requirement to obtain a temporary use permit. No additional code standards would apply beyond what is already established in the underlying zone. These mobile vendors would also be required to obtain a City of Auburn Business License. Additionally, City code should address the standards and process for placing a mobile vendor on private property vs. placement in the public right-of-way. 2. Create a prohibition on certain temporary gravel parking lots that are not associated with an active and permitted development. AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 2 Over the last six years the City has issued seven temporary use permits for the purpose of establishing gravel parking lots. The permits were submitted and approved based on the intent to temporarily serve uses such as a church, paid permit parking for commuters, and commercial uses until a more permanent parking facility is established. In all seven situations the landowner’s intent was to serve an immediate parking need by establishing a gravel lot with the intention to convert the gravel to pavement at a later date. Unfortunately, in all seven instances the owner opted not to prepare the plans and proceed with the construction work to convert the gravel to pavement. As a result, all seven instances resulted in a labor intensive and time consuming enforcement proceeding. There are a number of problems with gravel parking lots. First, city code requires that most non- residential uses provide paved parking. Second, vehicles that utilize gravel surfaces track gravel out on to the public road which, over time, causes damage to the road. Third, proper storm water facilities are not installed with temporary uses which means that storm water is not collected, managed, or treated before leaving the site which results in an outcome that is inconsistent with Washington State Department of Ecology requirements for local municipalities. There are, however, circumstances where it may be appropriate to authorize a temporary gravel parking lot. For this reason, staff is not suggesting that they be outright prohibited. For example, a gravel parking area that serves as a staging location in support of an active construction project. 3. Develop an annual events permit for facilities that host a series of events over a one-year period. The current temporary use provisions require a separate temporary use permit for each event that is held on a property. There are a number of properties in Auburn that host several short term events over the course of a year. Examples of such properties include Emerald Downs, the Outlet Collection, schools, and Boeing. Staff is suggesting that provisions be added to the code that allow a property owner to apply for and receive a single temporary use permit that encompasses multiple events 4. Update temporary use standards to improve clarity and incorporate existing interpretations and practices. The temporary use provisions are confusing and overly complex. There are numerous categories within residential and commercial zones, levels of intensity of the activity, events vs. structures, and exemptions vs. prohibitions vs. permissions. Many of these categorizations are appropriate but can be synthesized into a table to make them more readable and understandable. Additionally, as it pertains to the placement of storage containers on property, the City has operated under several varying code interpretations that have been administered over the last several years. For the sake of transparency and availability, staff recommends that these provisions be moved from a written interpretation that is not easy to obtain and into the City code. 2.0 Comprehensive Plan Policies The following comprehensive plan policies outlined in Exhibit 1 relate to the proposed regulatory update: Exhibit 1. Comprehensive Plan Policies Public Space + Events Description – The Comprehensive Plan supports the use of parks and public spaces for community building events such as during the holidays, concerts, parades, outdoor movies, art, and other AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 3 community events. Community building events and temporary uses may also occur on private property with approval from the City. Goals Provide and support community events, festivals, and programs that offer a variety of opportunities for social interaction and contribute to a sense of community. Celebration: We design, construct, and utilize our parks and streets so that we can gather on holidays, listen to music, attend parades, watch movies, view art, observe nature, and enjoy other community events. Community events: Continue and build upon Auburn’s tradition of gathering for large community events, such as parades, holiday celebrations and cultural events (examples: 4th of July, Veterans Day). Summer events: Expand the offering of free summer events in Auburn’s parks and expand evening special event offerings to include entertainment, local vendors and other attractions that draw a crowd. Ensure safe, well connected and accessible neighborhoods with healthy food, parks and local services in close proximity. Downtown living: Support the development of housing Downtown in correlation with efforts to enhance livability in the area. Encourage safe and comfortable pedestrian walkways, cafes and restaurants, a variety of businesses, access to recreation/open space, and healthy food options. To ensure the long-term economic health of the City and the region through a diversified economic base that supports a wide range of employment opportunities for Auburn's residents and those of the region and through the promotion of quality industrial and commercial development which matches the aspirations of the community. Objective: Emerald Downs, the Muckleshoot Casino, and the Outlet Collection offer opportunities for economic diversification that should be optimized by the City. 3.0 Approaches in Other Cities 3.1 City of Portland, OR The City of Portland is a leader in the food truck movement and has rules in place that address food trucks or mobile vending on both private properties and the in the public right-of-way. Food trucks on private property may require a planning and building permit and/or an electrical permit. However, vehicles that meet certain criteria are considered exempt and are allowed on sites where retail is a permitted use. Another consideration is that even if food trucks or mobile vending units are on private property they may impact use of the public-right-of way as shown in Exhibit 2. Exempt vehicles must meet the following criteria: 1. The cart will sit on an existing paved parking area that is zoned to allow retail uses 2. The cart will not be more than 16' in length 3. The cart has wheels, and the wheels will not be removed 4. Any canopies, awnings or any other attachments are supported entirely by the cart and do not touch the ground 5. The unit is self-contained, with no plumbing connections (City of Portland, 2016) AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 4 Exhibit 2. Food Trucks on Private Property in Portland, OR Source: www.trazee.com, 2016 3.2 Village of Essex Junction, VT Essex Junction, VT has an annual events permit process and standards to govern events at the Fairgrounds. The Fairgrounds has over 100 events a year and the annual permit process is an opportunity for Village Staff to review the events with Fairgrounds staff and other Village departments including public works and police to address traffic, noise, and other potential impacts. If additional events arise that were not on the annual permit the Fairgrounds must apply for an individual event permit. Standards are contained in the Village’s Land Development Code in Section LDC 502.E.6.b. 3.3 City of Kirkland, WA The City of Kirkland requires a business license for conducting any business inside the City limits, but does provide a temporary business license option. The temporary business license is valid for up to 35 consecutive days. 3.4 City of Redmond, WA The City of Redmond allows for long term temporary use permits that are valid for up to two years. Food trucks, referred to as “Motorized Catering” are exempt from the requirement to obtain a temporary use permit if operating at a single location for less than 3 hours per day. 3.5 City of Seattle, WA The City of Seattle has separate requirements and processes for food trucks depending on whether they are in the public right-of-way (Street use permit through the Department of Transportation) or on private property (temporary use permit from the Department of Construction and Inspections). In many instances food trucks on private property are exempt from permitting requirements with the property owners permission and if the truck is in one location and is not parked overnight. Longer term permitting for food trucks may require a temporary use permit or for permanent locations a zoning and building permit. 3.6 City of Langley, WA The City of Langley licenses food trucks on both private property and in specific locations within the public right-of-way. Food trucks on private property are only permitted in zones that allow restaurants. Food AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 5 trucks are required to obtain a seasonal business license as food trucks are only permitted during the summer tourist season from Memorial Day until the weekend after Labor Day. 3.7 Best Practices Cities are increasingly recognizing the importance of temporary uses and public space programming to activate public spaces particularly in downtowns and neighborhood districts. Food trucks, pop-up retail, community events, and dynamic public art installations give people a reason to use public space and can serve as economic development incubators that may lead to new brick and mortar restaurants and businesses. In order to support these types of activities the City must have rules and regulations in place to ensure they are a success and don’t have any negative impacts. The City of Seattle put in food truck rules several years ago and one of the early food trucks, Skillet, now has several brick and mortar restaurants in the City (See Exhibit 3). Exhibit 3. Skillet Source: USA Today, 2008 The recent programming of Westlake Plaza in Seattle is another success story. The project, led by the Seattle Downtown Association, added new seating, games, food trucks, concerts, and other activities that has transformed a once underutilized public space into a thriving and diverse gathering space (See Exhibit 4). AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 6 Exhibit 4. Westlake Plaza Programming Source: City of Seattle, 2016 4.0 Regulatory Options 4.1 Regulating Food Trucks and Mobile Vending through Temporary Use Regulations – Alternative 1 Under this option most issues under this task would be addressed with modifications to the existing temporary use regulations (AMC 18.46.A). Requirements for temporary uses to obtain a business license will be cross-referenced in the temporary use regulations with updated business license requirements in Auburn Municipal Code (AMC) Title 5 that require temporary uses to get a business license. Temporary use permits for food trucks may be valid for up to one year and may be renewed (See Exhibit 5). For food trucks or mobile vending in a fixed location for more than one year the City will review and issue a zoning permit. This style of more permanent food truck and mobile vending use will only be permitted in areas where retail and/or restaurants are allowed and on designated public properties. Food trucks parked in one location for less than three hours a day would be exempt from the permitting requirements, but must obtain a temporary business license. Short-term mobile vending in public parks will continue to permitted through a special use permit issued by the Parks Department. Exhibit 5. Regulating Food Truck/Mobile Vending through Temporary Uses Food Truck/Mobile Vending Type Permit Required Less than 3 hours per day in one location and with no overnight parking Exempt from permit but subject to adopted standards; requires temporary or annual business AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 7 license, King County health permit, property owner permission Temporary Use: More than 3 hours and less than one year in one location not in right-of-way Temporary use permit; temporary business license, King County health permit, property owner permission More than one year; fixed location not in right- of-way, Zoning and building permit, business license, King County health permit, property owner permission Within right-of-way; more than 3 hours Right-of-way use permit; subject to adopted standards; requires temporary or annual business license, King County health permit, property owner permission 4.2 Regulating Food Trucks and Mobile Vending through Business Licenses – Alternative 2 Alternative 2 includes all the items listed in Alternative 1, but includes a different approach to regulating some temporary business activities such as mobile vending and food trucks. Under this alternative temporary business activities, including food trucks, would be regulated under the business license regulations in AMC Title 5 with the exceptions of an annual events permit provision and food trucks in a fixed location for more than one year. Where a food truck is proposed to be placed in a non-residential location for less than one year, the requirement to obtain a temporary use permit would be eliminated. A City business license would therefore sanction the food truck. This will allow the food truck to be mobile and not tied to a specific location. It also provides an opportunity to review and/or inform the applicant of the following types of standards that would be incorporated in the code:  For food trucks that are located on-site for less than 3 hours, there are no additional rules that apply. Existing laws will be enforced that prohibit the placement of the food truck in an ADA accessible parking space, within a marked fire lane, or blocking a sidewalk or driveway. Other agency permits would also be required such as a King County Health Permit.  For food trucks that are located on site for more than 3 hours (and less than a year), standards will be proposed that ensure continued upkeep of the overall appearance of the truck and its surroundings, management of trash, placement of picnic tables and seating, setbacks from buildings and public walkways, maintenance of driver sight lines at ingress/egress/corners, continued provision of adequate on-site parking, access to utility meters, etc. Food trucks or mobile vending in a fixed location for more than one-year would be permitted through a zoning and building permit (See Exhibit 6). Exhibit 6. Regulating Food Truck/Mobile Vending through Business Licenses Food Truck/Mobile Vending Type Permit Required Less than 3 hours per day in one location Exempt from permit but subject to adopted standards; requires temporary or annual business license, King County Health Permit, property owner permission AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 8 More than 3 hours per day in single location; up to one year Temporary business license, King County health permit, property owner permission More than one year; fixed location not in right- of-way Zoning and building permit (fixed-location), business license, King County health permit, property owner permission Within right-of-way; more than 3 hours Right-of-way use permit; subject to adopted standards; requires temporary or annual business license, King County health permit, property owner permission 4.3 Other Regulatory Updates Other amendments as described in Section 1.0:  Eliminate allowances for most temporary gravel parking lots  Develop an annual events permit for facilities that host a series of events over a one-year period  Option: Develop a street-use permit for food trucks and mobile vending in the public right-of-way  Update temporary use standards to improve clarity  Incorporate standards for use and placement of storage containers 5.0 Questions 1. Should mobile vending and food trucks be regulated under the temporary use or business license regulations? 2. Should the City develop a street-use permit to allow food trucks to locate in the public right-of-way? 3. Should other regulatory updates move forward such as the elimination of certain gravel parking lots and improving temporary use regulations for clarity? 6.0 Recommendations A. Mobile Vending and Food Trucks. Staff recommends that mobile vending and food trucks be regulated through updated business license regulations to operate for up to one year because the business license program provides a faster and cheaper alternative yet still affords the City with adequate authority to require minimum standards be met. Mobile vending and food trucks in fixed locations for more than one year would be permitted through a zoning and building permit as necessary. B. Street use permit for food trucks. Staff recommends establishing a street-use permit for food trucks to operate in the public right-of-way. New standards will be developed to ensure that food trucks do not negatively impact the public’s use of the right-of-way or adjacent development. C. Temporary Gravel Parking Lots. Except in limited circumstances described above, staff recommends temporary gravel parking lots be prohibited. D. Annual Events Permit. Staff recommends the temporary use regulations be modified to allow for an annual events permits at facilities that operate multiple events over a one-year period. Additional events may be added during the course of the year with a single event temporary use permit. AUBURN TEMPORARY USES November 2016 9 E. Update Temporary Use Regulations for Clarity. In addition to the amendments described above, staff recommends proceeding with updates to the temporary use regulations to improve clarity and to incorporate standards for the use and placement of storage containers on private property.