Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-11-2017 CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION AGENDACity Council Study Session HHS SFA September 11, 2017 - 5:30 PM Council Chambers - City Hall AGENDA I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call II. ANNOUNCEMENTS REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS A.Auburn Boeing Fabrication Site Remedial Investigation Report - Annual Briefing by Department of Ecology (30 Minutes) B. Ray of Hope Resource Center Update (10 Minutes) III. AGENDA ITEMS FOR COUNCIL DISCUSSION A.Resolution No. 5297 (10 Minutes) (Snyder) A Resolution that authorizes the Mayor to execute a flood protection easement for properties owned by the City of Auburn that will provide access to King County for maintenance and construction of flood protection facilities along the White River B.Airport Jet A Fuel Proposal (10 Minutes) (Snyder) IV. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES DISCUSSION ITEMS A.Proposed King County Modular Housing Project (Hinman)(15 Minutes) B.Human Services Funding Parameters(Hinman) V. OTHER DISCUSSION ITEMS VI. NEW BUSINESS VII. MATRIX A.Matrix VIII. ADJOURNMENT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. 1 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Auburn Boeing Fabrication Site Remedial Investigation Report - Annual Briefing by Department of Ecology (30 Minutes) Date: September 5, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: PowerPoint Presentation Exhibit 1 - Draft RI Report RI Report - Soil Fact Sheet RI Report - Surface Water Fact Sheet RI Report - Ground Water Fact Sheet Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Neil Hines, Department of Ecology, to provide annual briefing on the contents and findings of the multi-year remedial investigation and report and discuss next steps in the cleanup process Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 2 of 44 BOEING AUBURN FABRICATION SITE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION 3 of 44 We are here 4 of 44 CONTAMINATION CAN GET INTO GROUNDWATER, SURFACE WATER, SOIL & AIR 5 of 44 CONTAMINATION IN GROUNDWATER 35 TO 75 FT. 6 of 44 TCE IN GROUNDWATER0 TO 30 FT. N7 of 44 CLEANUP FOR SURFACE WATER WILL BE MORE STRINGENT THAN DRINKING WATER 8 of 44 SURFACE WATER RESULTS 9 of 44 MORE SOIL EVALUATION IS IN FEASIBILITY STUDY 10 of 44 INVESTIGATION OF AIR QUALITY 11 of 44 AIR QUALITY RESULTS 12 of 44 WHAT WILL BE IN THE FEASIBILITY STUDY? •Evaluation for cleanup or remediation techniques •Cost •Likelihood of success •Timeline for implementation •Cleanup levels for groundwater & surface water will be proposed 13 of 44 ECOLOGY RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS •Public Comment Period March 8 –May 8, 2017 •Open House and Public Hearing •Nearly 30 comments •Responsiveness Summary 14 of 44 BOEING AUBURN FABRICATION SITE NEAL HINES (425) 649-7181NEAL.HINES@ECY.WA.GOV 15 of 44 4 1 Boeing Auburn Fabrication Site The Washington State Department of Ecology reviewed the draft report of a Remedial Investigation (RI) into groundwater contamination from the Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility. The public was invited to review the draft RI Report during a public comment period held March 8 - May 8, 2017.This folio provides an overview of the purpose and findings of the Remedial Investigation, the agencies involved and opportunities for the public to provide feedback. In parts of Auburn and Algona, groundwater, water that flows under the ground through soil, is contaminated with a degreasing chemical called trichloroethene (TCE) and its breakdown products. The chemicals originated from the Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility (Facility) and are believed to be a result of historic operations, likely from the mid-1960s until the mid-1980s. The area with contaminated groundwater, called a plume, reaches approximately one mile northwest from the Facility (see map, page 3). Ecology is overseeing Boeing’s investigation of the contamination and will review and select a plan for cleanup. Ecology’s approval is required in each step of the investigation to ensure that state cleanup standards are met. The public will have opportunities to comment throughout the cleanup process. Algona and Auburn Groundwater Contamination Results Implementation of the Cleanup Action Plan includes design, construction, operations and monitoring. Cleanup & Monitoring The Cleanup Action Plan specifies cleanup standards, methods, schedule, describes the steps to be taken, and includes any additional environmental monitoring required during and after the cleanup. Cleanup Action Plan (CAP) The Feasibility Study uses the information from the Remedial Investigation to identify and evaluate cleanup alternatives. Then an optimal alternative will be selected and incorporated into the Cleanup Action Plan. Feasibility Study (FS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLEANUPPLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLEANUPPLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLEANUPPLAN If the contaminants are found to pose a risk to human health or the environment, Ecology will direct Boeing to take immediate action to reduce this risk. This happened on the Boeing property in 2004, when an Interim Action was taken to contain a known source for the plume. Since that time, chemicals found have been at low levels and not expected to pose a risk to human health or the environment. Interim Action A Remedial Investigation defines the nature, extent and magnitude of pollution at a site in order to identify the best method for cleanup. Remedial Investigation (RI) + Draft Report 1 2 3 4 5 6 CLEANUPPLAN Opportunities for public commentWe Are HereRemedial Investigation identifies the location and concentration of contamination The Remedial Investigation (RI) identified the boundaries of the plume and the potential impacts of the contamination by evaluating data from soil, groundwater, surface water and air samples. The investigation also sampled Areas of Concern (AOCs) and Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) at the Facility for other contaminants, such as metals and petroleum. Under Ecology’s oversight, Boeing completed sampling and compiled a draft RI Report that summarizes the investigation’s findings and recommendations. Ecology reviewed and revised the draft RI Report, which is available for public review. Model Toxics Control Act Washington State’s Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) sets cleanup standards and a process to ensure that the quality of cleanup, protection of human health and environment are not compromised. Boeing must follow MTCA’s cleanup regulations and process under Ecology’s oversight as shown to the right. Boeing Auburn Facility is Source of Contamination Publication Number 17-04-028Publication Number 17-04-028June 2017 June 2017 Historic photo of Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility Para más información acerca de la contaminación del agua subterránea en Algona y Auburn en español, favor de contactar a Luis Buen Abad al (425) 649-4485. Якщо ви хочете отримати інформацію про забруднення ґрунтових вод у Алгоні та Оберні українською мовою, будь ласка, зателефонуйте (425) 649-7181, щоб поговорити зі співробітником Департаменту Екології та перекладачем. ਅਲਗੋਨਾ (Algona) ਅਤੇ ਔਬਰਨ (Auburn) ਵਿੱਚ ਭੂਮੀਗਤ ਪਾਣੀ ਦੇ ਦੂਸ਼ਣ ਬਾਰੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲਈ, ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਚੌਗਿਰਦਾ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ (Ecology) ਦੇ ਸਟਾਫ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਦੁਭਾਸ਼ੀਏ ਨਾਲ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ (425) 649-7181 ਤੇ ਫੋਨ ਕਰੋ। Para sa higit pang impormasyon tungkol sa pagkakontamina ng groundwater sa Algona at Auburn na nasa wikang Tagalog, mangyaring tumawag sa (425) 649-7181 upang makipag-usap sa isang miyembro ng kawani ng Ecology at sa isang interpreter. 16 of 44 2 3 Remedial Investigation Results Ecology proposes to approve the RI as complete. Data collected during the RI sufficiently defines the area, concentrations and sources of contamination. Results from data collected during the RI do not indicate adverse health effects from occasionally touching or accidentally swallowing the contaminated water or breathing the air in areas above the contaminated groundwater. Investigation at the site focused on the four main topics listed below. For additional information on each topic, please review the corresponding fact sheets (also available in español) or the draft RI Report. These materials can be found on the project’s website. Soil Of the 31 SWMUs and AOCs at the Facility, Ecology will require Boeing to further evaluate four in the FS. Chemicals released may include low levels of petroleum hydrocarbons, cyanide and metals, such as cadmium and copper. Surface water Ecology is requiring surface water be protected to the same rigorous standards that are used for drinking water. Boeing investigated ponds, streams, wetlands and stormwater ditches in Algona and Auburn. Hundreds of samples were collected and analyzed and do not indicate adverse health effects if people touch the surface water. Bodies of water include Government Canal, the stormwater collection ditch on Chicago Avenue, the O Street wetland, the Outlet Collection stormwater ponds and stormwater collection ditch, the Auburn 400 ponds, Mill Creek, and various wetlands associated with Mill Creek, including the Auburn Environmental Park. No contaminants are presently detected in the public drinking water. Drinking water is provided by the City of Auburn public drinking water systems, which are monitored for contaminants. Private wells are not monitored like public drinking water. If you have a private well, please contact Ecology. Groundwater Ecology is recommending Boeing continue to evaluate site-wide groundwater and that it be further addressed in the FS. Groundwater is water found underground that moves slowly through soil, sand and rocks. Ecology is considering a strategy to clean up groundwater to state standards at locations across the site (referred to as a “site-wide strategy” in the draft RI Report), not just at specific locations where contamination was originally released. The original source areas for the contaminated groundwater plumes at the Facility do not indicate the need for additional source cleanup at this time. If contamination levels are above cleanup levels, Ecology will propose remediation or cleanup at those locations. Air quality (vapor intrusion) Ecology is not recommending further indoor air evaluation, and indoor air will not be part of the FS because there are no indications of health risks. Ecology has reviewed air quality data from samples taken in residential and commercial areas over contaminated groundwater, and the Department of Health has reviewed results from air sampling data. None of the data indicate human health risks from breathing air in these locations. The site includes areas where the groundwater investigation has occurred. Publication Number: 13-09-185 16 Please reuse and recycle Boeing Fabrication Auburn Site Figure 1: Shallow and intermediate contaminated groundwater plumes as of April 2013. C St SWUnincorporated King County City of Pacific City of Federal Way City of Auburn Unincorporated King CountyCity of Algona Boeing Auburn Facility Boeing Auburn Facility Shallow Zone TCE Contour (0-35 ft) Intermediate Zone TCE Contour (35-75 ft) 18 167 N View the Draft RI Report To view a hardcopy, please visit one of these locations: • Department of Ecology 3190 160th Ave SE Bellevue, WA 98008 • Auburn Library 1102 Auburn Way S Auburn, WA 98002 • Algona-Pacific Library 255 Ellingson Rd Pacific, WA 98047 The draft report can also be viewed online by visiting the project’s website. Key Terms Areas of Concern (AOCs): Places with actual or potential contamination that require investigation or remediation. Cleanup Action Plan (CAP): The third major step in the MTCA cleanup process; a description of the standards, methods, schedule, steps and monitoring to be undertaken during or after cleanup. Cleanup and Monitoring: The fourth major step in the MTCA cleanup process; the implementation and oversight of the CAP. Facility: The Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility, also known as Boeing property. Feasibility Study (FS): The second major step in the MTCA cleanup process; an evaluation of methods of cleanup. Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA): Washington’s pollution cleanup law for contaminated sites. Plume: The area covered by the spread of contaminated groundwater. Remedial Investigation (RI): The first of four major steps in the MTCA cleanup process; a detailed study of a site’s contamination. Site: The Boeing property, plume and all affected areas. Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs): Any piece of equipment at the Facility from which contaminants might have migrated. Trichloroethene (TCE): A liquid degreaser used to clean grease and oil from metal objects; a volatile organic compound. Vapor Intrusion: Occurs when vapor forming chemicals (VOCs) migrate from a subsurface source (groundwater) into an overlying building through cracks or other openings in building foundations. Vinyl Chloride (VC): A breakdown product of TCE; a volatile organic compound. Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs): Compounds that easily evaporate from water into air at normal air temperatures. Examples of household products that contain these compounds include gasoline, dry cleaning fluid, solvents and paint thinners. Next Steps After the RI The next step in the MTCA cleanup process is the FS, which will develop and evaluate cleanup action alternatives. Ecology is requiring Boeing to further evaluate: • Four Facility SWMUs and AOCs for remediation of petroleum hydrocarbons and metals. • Site-wide groundwater and surface water for remediation of TCE and VC. Publication Number 17-04-028 Publication Number 17-04-028June 2017 June 2017 To request ADA accommodation for disabilities, or printed materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at (425) 649-7000 or visit www.ecy.wa.gov/accessibility.html. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability may call TTY at (877) 833-6341. For more information Call our hotline (English/Español): (253) 219-7645 Email the project: BoeingAuburnSite@ecy.wa.gov Visit the website: Bit.ly/EcyBoeingAuburn Visit the Spanish website: Bit.ly/FabricaciónBoeingAuburn Join the listserv: Bit.ly/2f6dyqz FSID #:2018 CSID #:5049 17 of 44 1Publication Number 17-04-008 March 2017 Updated September 2017 Boeing Auburn Fabrication Site SOIL Remedial Investigation Results Soil Contamination on the Boeing Auburn Property (Facility) Requires Additional Evaluation Remedial Investigation Found Some Soil Contamination at the Boeing Facility The Department of Ecology (Ecology) oversaw a comprehensive investigation of contamination, called a Remedial Investigation (RI), at the Boeing Facility (Facility). The investigation evaluated Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) and Areas of Concern (AOCs) during the Remedial Investigation. Of the 62 SWMUs and AOCs identified at the Facility as part of the RCRA Facility Assessment, Ecology required the Boeing Company (Boeing) to further investigate 31 SWMUs and AOCs. Ecology determined that four of the 31 SWMUs and AOCs investigated will require further soil evaluation by Boeing in the Feasibility Study (FS), the next phase in the cleanup process. Of the 31 SWMUs and AOCs investigated, most had some traces of metals, petroleum hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Most detections were below conservative screening levels; however, Ecology will require additional soil evaluation in the FS. Ecology Recommends Remediation for Two Solid Waste Management Units Two SWMUs under Building 17-06 (SWMUs S-15a and S-16) at the Facility have evidence of one or more releases and are recommended for additional study. Each SWMU investigation included discussion of any investigation or activities that were carried out before the RI, soil and/or groundwater evaluations during the RI and recommendations for whether the SWMU needed additional evaluation in the FS. Petroleum hydrocarbon, a contaminant from gasoline or oil, was found in soil along the east side of Building 17-06 at the Facility. The source of the petroleum hydrocarbon release may have been structures associated with milling aluminum parts. The two areas of soil contamination will be carried forward as a new AOC for evaluation in the FS to address petroleum hydrocarbon groundwater impacts. 18th Street SW Ellingson Road Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary Area 1 Former 17-05 17-07 17-06 Former 17-03 A C F D B 17-12 Junior Achievement YMCA E 17-70F E 18th Street SW Ellingson Road Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary Area 1 Former 17-05 17-07 17-06 Former 17-03 A C F D B 17-12 Junior Achievement YMCA E 17-70F E 18 of 44 2Publication Number 17-04-008 March 2017 Updated September 2017 Ecology Recommends Remediation for Two Areas of Concern The investigation into each AOC included any investigation or activities that were carried out before the RI, soil and/or groundwater evaluations during the RI and recommendations for whether the AOC needed additional evaluation in the FS. Two AOCs at the Facility (one below the ground between Buildings 17-06 and 17-07, and one under Building 17-07) have evidence of one or more releases and are recommended for additional work. • At AOC A-01, releases from an underground storage tank of gasoline between Building 17-06 and 17-07 contaminated the ground with petroleum hydrocarbon. This area of contaminated soil will be evaluated to address petroleum hydrocarbon groundwater impacts in the FS. • At AOC A-09, releases of metals were associated with a leak from an acid scrubber on the south side of Building 17-07 at the Facility. A partial remediation of the area was conducted before the RI; however, soil samples collected after the remediation indicated that cadmium, copper, lead and cyanide were left in place above screening levels. The soil in this area will be evaluated to address metals and cyanide contamination in groundwater. Next Steps: Feasibility Study Will Propose Cleanup Alternatives Cleanup of the two SWMUs and two AOCs will be included in the FS to address soil and related groundwater contamination. Ecology and Boeing will have more information on cleanup alternatives when the FS is released in late 2017. Якщо ви хочете отримати інформацію про забруднення ґрунтових вод у Алгоні та Оберні українською мовою, будь ласка, зателефонуйте 425-649-7181, щоб поговорити зі співробітником Департаменту Екології та перекладачем. ਅਲਗੋਨਾ (Algona) ਅਤੇ ਔਬਰਨ (Auburn) ਵਿੱਚ ਭੂਮੀਗਤ ਪਾਣੀ ਦੇ ਦੂਸ਼ਣ ਬਾਰੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲਈ, ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਚੌਗਿਰਦਾ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ (Ecology) ਦੇ ਸਟਾਫ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਦੁਭਾਸ਼ੀਏ ਨਾਲ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ 425-649-7181 ਤੇ ਫੋਨ ਕਰੋ। Para sa higit pang impormasyon tungkol sa pagkakontamina ng groundwater sa Algona at Auburn na nasa wikang Tagalog, mangyaring tumawag sa 425-649-7181 upang makipag- usap sa isang miyembro ng kawani ng Ecology at sa isang interpreter. Key Terms Areas of Concern (AOCs) Places with actual or potential contamination that require investigation of remediation. Cleanup Level The concentration of a hazardous substance in soil, water, air or sediment that is determined to be protective of human health and the environment under specified exposure conditions. Facility The Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility, also known as the Boeing property. Feasibility Study (FS) A detailed study identifying and evaluating cleanup alternatives. Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Washington’s pollution cleanup law for contaminated sites. Plume The area covered by the spread of contaminated groundwater. RCRA Facility Assessment The initial phase of corrective action under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Remedial Investigation (RI) An investigation of a site’s contamination. Screening Level Concentration levels of contaminants used early on in an investigation when knowledge about the contaminants and impacts is low (e.g. routes of exposure are unknown, number of contaminants are unknown). If screening levels are exceeded, then a more detailed and focused investigation is made. Site The Boeing property, plume and all affected areas. Solid Waste Management Units (SWMUs) Any piece of equipment at the Facility from which contaminants might have migrated. Trichloroethene (TCE) A liquid degreaser used to clean grease and oil from metal objects; a volatile organic compound. Vinyl Chloride (VC) A breakdown product of TCE; a volatile organic compound. Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Compounds that easily evaporate from water into air at normal air temperatures. Examples of household products that contain these compounds include gasoline, dry cleaning fluid, solvents and paint thinners. This fact sheet should be accompanied by the Remedial Investigation Folio and is one of four fact sheets relaying information about the investigation’s findings. To request ADA accommodation for disabilities, or printed materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at (425) 649-7000 or visit www.ecy.wa.gov/accessibility.html. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability may call TTY at (877) 833-6341. 19 of 44 1Publication Number 17-04-010 March 2017 Updated September 2017 Boeing Auburn Fabrication Site Surface Water in Auburn and Algona is Not a Hazard to Human Health Ecology Oversaw the Remedial Investigation of Surface Water The Department of Ecology (Ecology) oversaw a comprehensive investigation of contamination, called a Remedial Investigation (RI), at the Boeing Facility (Facility). The investigation focused on volatile organic compounds (VOCs), trichloroethene (TCE) and its breakdown product, vinyl chloride (VC). The results from the RI do not indicate negative health effects if people touch the surface water in Auburn and Algona. During the investigation, the Boeing Company (Boeing) sampled surface water, wetland and stormwater features (ditches) and yard water. Contaminants from the Facility were generally not detected in Mill Creek or the Auburn Environmental Park wetlands. Algona’s Surface Water Samples Report Some Contamination Surface water samples were taken from Government Canal, the Chicago Avenue ditch and yards and ditches in Algona. Concentrations for all samples were below the drinking water requirements. Ecology will require cleanup levels to be lower (more stringent) than the drinking water standards. Government Canal and Chicago Avenue Ditch Results Surface water samples taken from Government Canal, which flows south, did not detect any of the contaminants. However, surface water samples taken at Chicago Avenue ditch, which flows north, did detect contamination, most likely from shallow groundwater emerging into the ditches. Washington State Department of Health and Ecology reviewed several years of monitoring data from the ditch and surrounding stormwater features and concluded that there are no adverse health effects from occasionally touching or accidentally swallowing this water. The water in these ditches is not a source for drinking water, but is protected downstream as a potential future drinking water source. Yard Surface Water Results Surface water samples were collected from residential yards in Algona during winter flooding to test whether groundwater might emerge into yards. All Mill CreekChicago Avenue DitchGovernment CanalAuburn 400 South pond Outlet collection storm water pond Auburn Environmental Park Safeway The Outlet Connection Junior Achievement 18th Street SW Ellingson Rd Auburn 400 North pond O Street Wetland YMCA 18 167 N Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary SURFACE WATER Remedial Investigation Results 20 of 44 2Publication Number 17-04-010 March 2017 Updated September 2017 results were far below the health-based screening levels and did not indicate a need for further evaluation. Ecology invited residents from 27 homes to have their yard water tested. These homes were selected because they were located above contaminated groundwater that could potentially discharge to yard water. Five agreed to participate. Of the homes that agreed to sampling, there were no detections of TCE or VC in yard water samples except at one location. At that location, the sample result was just at the detection limit and well below the screening levels. Water Quality in Commercial Auburn is Not at Risk Investigations also evaluated areas in Auburn, including the O Street wetland, the Auburn Environmental Park wetlands, the Outlet Collection ponds, the Auburn 400 storm water ponds, the channelized portion of the wetlands west of State Route 167 and Mill Creek. The only detections in Auburn have been in the Auburn 400 storm water ponds and just downstream. Most VOC concentrations measured in surface water were below levels that would require cleanup. However, a few detections of TCE and VC in the Auburn 400 storm water ponds are above detection limits and above the most stringent surface water quality criteria that are intended to protect surface water for beneficial uses, such as drinking water and eating fish. Next Steps: Feasibility Study Will Propose Cleanup Alternatives Ecology is recommending that Boeing continue to monitor surface water and will determine cleanup actions during and after the FS to ensure surface water will be protected in the future. Although TCE and VC were detected in some storm water collection ponds and channels in Algona and southwest Auburn, their extent is limited. Concentrations do not indicate that negative health impacts would result from occasionally touching or swallowing the water or breathing the air. More About Drinking Water None of the contaminants are presently detected in drinking water. Drinking water is provided by the public drinking water system of Auburn whose wells draw from much deeper in the ground and are located to the east, away from the direction of groundwater flow. The drinking water supply is monitored for contaminants that include TCE and VC. Private wells are not monitored like public drinking water. If you have a private well, please contact Ecology. Якщо ви хочете отримати інформацію про забруднення ґрунтових вод у Алгоні та Оберні українською мовою, будь ласка, зателефонуйте 425-649-7181, щоб поговорити зі співробітником Департаменту Екології та перекладачем. ਅਲਗੋਨਾ (Algona) ਅਤੇ ਔਬਰਨ (Auburn) ਵਿੱਚ ਭੂਮੀਗਤ ਪਾਣੀ ਦੇ ਦੂਸ਼ਣ ਬਾਰੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲਈ, ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਚੌਗਿਰਦਾ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ (Ecology) ਦੇ ਸਟਾਫ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਦੁਭਾਸ਼ੀਏ ਨਾਲ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ 425-649-7181 ਤੇ ਫੋਨ ਕਰੋ। Para sa higit pang impormasyon tungkol sa pagkakontamina ng groundwater sa Algona at Auburn na nasa wikang Tagalog, mangyaring tumawag sa 425-649-7181 upang makipag-usap sa isang miyembro ng kawani ng Ecology at sa isang interpreter. This fact sheet should be accompanied by the Remedial Investigation Folio and is one of four fact sheets relaying information about the investigation’s findings. To request ADA accommodation for disabilities, or printed materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at (425) 649-7000 or visit www.ecy.wa.gov/accessibility.html. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability may call TTY at (877) 833-6341. Key Terms Cleanup Level The concentration of a hazardous substance in soil, water, air or sediment that is determined to be protective of human health and the environment under specified exposure conditions. Detection Limit The minimum concentration of a compound that can be measured and reported with 99 percent confidence. Facility The Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility, also known as the Boeing property. Feasibility Study (FS) A detailed study identifying and evaluating cleanup alternatives. Plume The area covered by the spread of contaminated groundwater. Remedial Investigation (RI) An investigation of a site’s contamination. Screening Level Concentration levels of contaminants used early on in an investigation when knowledge about the contaminants and impacts is low (e.g. routes of exposure are unknown, number of contaminants are unknown). If screening levels are exceeded, then a more detailed and focused investigation is made. Site The Boeing property, plume and all affected areas. Trichloroethene (TCE) An industrial degreaser and volatile organic compound. Vinyl Chloride (VC) A breakdown product of TCE; a volatile organic compound. Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Compounds that easily evaporate from water into air at normal air temperatures. Examples of household products that contain these compounds include gasoline, dry cleaning fluid, solvents and paint thinners. 21 of 44 1Publication Number 17-04-009 March 2017 Updated September 2017 Boeing Auburn Fabrication Site Groundwater Contamination Under Parts of Algona and Auburn Remedial Investigation Determines Cleanup or Remediation Is Needed The Department of Ecology (Ecology) oversaw a comprehensive investigation of contamination, called a Remedial Investigation (RI), at the Boeing Facility (Facility). Groundwater contamination was found under parts of Algona and Auburn. Groundwater is water found underground that moves slowly through soil, sand and rocks. Based on the RI, Ecology will require the contaminated groundwater beyond the Boeing property boundary and three locations that are sources of contamination at the Facility to be cleaned up or remediated. The three locations on the Facility requiring cleanup include: • Building 17-06 (SWMU 15a/ SWMU 16) • Between Buildings 17-06 and 17-07 (AOC A-01); and • Building 17-07 (AOC A-09). How the cleanup or remediation will be done will be evaluated further in the Feasibility Study (FS), the next phase in the cleanup process. Ecology Oversaw the Remedial Investigation of Groundwater Historical releases of a chemical called trichloroethene (TCE) at the Facility contaminated the groundwater under parts of Algona and Auburn. Groundwater is water found underground that moves slowly through soil, sand and rocks. Ecology oversaw the RI to learn the location and concentration of contamination in groundwater, and to determine if concentrations were changing over time. The groundwater evaluation primarily measured the contaminants TCE and its breakdown product, vinyl chloride (VC). Ecology evaluated results of groundwater sampling at three levels below the surface of the ground: shallow (up to 35 feet below the surface), intermediate (35-75 feet below the surface) and deep (75-100 feet below the surface). Remedial Investigation Found Two Sources of TCE Contamination The site-wide TCE and VC groundwater plumes are referred to as the Area 1 plume and the western plume. Both contaminated plumes extend northwest 18th Street SW Ellingson Road Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary Area 1 Former 17-05 17-07 17-06 Former 17-03 A C F D B 17-12 Junior Achievement YMCA E 17-70F E 18th Street SW Ellingson Road Facility Boundary Boeing Property Boundary Prologis Property Boundary Area 1 Former 17-05 17-07 17-06 Former 17-03 A C F D B 17-12 Junior Achievement YMCA E 17-70F E GROUNDWATER Remedial Investigation Results 22 of 44 2Publication Number 17-04-009 March 2017 Updated September 2017 from the Boeing property under parts of Algona and Auburn, carrying contaminants in flowing groundwater. Concentrations of TCE and VC in the plumes are relatively dilute and are expected to decrease over time. Contamination at the Boeing Facility The Boeing Company (Boeing) interviewed long-time employees and conducted an extensive review of historical documents and engineering drawings to investigate TCE use at the Facility. Most TCE was used historically in three buildings (Building 17-07 and former Buildings 17-03 and 17-05) with stationary TCE vapor degreasers used to clean metal parts. Area 1 Plume The TCE degreaser and tank line in former Building 17-05 leaked and is the source of the Area 1 groundwater plume (see map in publication #17-04- 007). From 2004 to 2006, Boeing worked with Ecology to conduct an Interim Remedial Action to clean up residual TCE from this area. Western Plume The former TCE vapor degreaser in Building 17-07 (S-13a) is the likely source of the western groundwater plume, based on operational history and groundwater and soil gas data. The former chrome waste holding tank and the former north lagoon on the Boeing property may also have contributed to the groundwater plume. This degreaser structure, holding tank and piping have been removed and the north lagoon has been closed. Future groundwater cleanup will be incorporated into the site-wide groundwater cleanup proposals for the FS. Contaminated Groundwater Plumes Are Stable TCE and VC contaminant concentration trends at most wells at the site are not detectable, stable or decreasing over time, based on current statistical analysis. When the concentrations of contamination in groundwater remain the same or decrease over time, the plume is considered stable. Ecology will continue to evaluate the stability of the plume during the FS. Ecology May Determine That More Evaluation Is Needed The area where groundwater needs to be evaluated may change if sampling shows that the plumes have expanded beyond their current boundaries. Once groundwater cleanup levels are established in the FS, the plumes will be evaluated for cleanup, based on the areas where TCE and VC concentrations levels are above cleanup levels. Якщо ви хочете отримати інформацію про забруднення ґрунтових вод у Алгоні та Оберні українською мовою, будь ласка, зателефонуйте 425-649-7181, щоб поговорити зі співробітником Департаменту Екології та перекладачем. ਅਲਗੋਨਾ (Algona) ਅਤੇ ਔਬਰਨ (Auburn) ਵਿੱਚ ਭੂਮੀਗਤ ਪਾਣੀ ਦੇ ਦੂਸ਼ਣ ਬਾਰੇ ਪੰਜਾਬੀ ਵਿੱਚ ਹੋਰ ਜਾਣਕਾਰੀ ਲਈ, ਕਿਰਪਾ ਕਰਕੇ ਚੌਗਿਰਦਾ ਵਿਗਿਆਨ (Ecology) ਦੇ ਸਟਾਫ ਮੈਂਬਰ ਅਤੇ ਇੱਕ ਦੁਭਾਸ਼ੀਏ ਨਾਲ ਗੱਲ ਕਰਨ ਲਈ 425-649-7181 ਤੇ ਫੋਨ ਕਰੋ। Para sa higit pang impormasyon tungkol sa pagkakontamina ng groundwater sa Algona at Auburn na nasa wikang Tagalog, mangyaring tumawag sa 425-649-7181 upang makipag-usap sa isang miyembro ng kawani ng Ecology at sa isang interpreter. Key Terms Cleanup Level The concentration of a hazardous substance in soil, water, air or sediment that is determined to be protective of human health and the environment under specified exposure conditions. Facility The Boeing Auburn Fabrication Facility, also known as the Boeing property. Feasibility Study (FS) A detailed study identifying and evaluating cleanup alternatives. Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Washington’s pollution cleanup law for contaminated sites. Plume The area covered by the spread of contaminated groundwater. Remedial Investigation (RI) An investigation of a site’s contamination. Site The Boeing property, plume and all affected areas. Trichloroethene (TCE) A liquid degreaser used to clean grease and oil from metal objects; a volatile organic compound. Vinyl Chloride (VC) A breakdown product of TCE; a volatile organic compound. Volatile Organic Compound (VOCs) Compounds that easily evaporate from water into air at normal air temperatures. Examples of household products that contain these compounds include gasoline, dry cleaning fluid, solvents and paint thinners. Next Steps: Feasibility Study Will Propose Cleanup Alternatives Ecology and Boeing will have more information on how the site will be cleaned up in the FS. The FS will include alternatives for cleaning up the remaining groundwater contamination that has moved away from the source of the Area 1 and western plumes. For additional information on results, please visit: www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/hwtr/CleanupSites/ boeing-fabn/GroundwaterResults.html This fact sheet should be accompanied by the Remedial Investigation Folio and is one of four fact sheets relaying information about the investigation’s findings. To request ADA accommodation for disabilities, or printed materials in a format for the visually impaired, call Ecology at (425) 649-7000 or visit www.ecy.wa.gov/accessibility.html. Persons with impaired hearing may call Washington Relay Service at 711. Persons with speech disability may call TTY at (877) 833-6341. 23 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5297 (10 Minutes) (Snyder) Date: September 5, 2017 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: Resolution No. 5297 Exhibit 1 - Flood Protection Easement Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted Resolution No. 5160 on July 20, 2015 which authorized the purchase of approximately 41.5 acres from Puget Sound Energy along the White River. The property acquisition was funded through the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund. County funding paid for the property ($75,000.00) and all real estate transaction costs ($8,727.30). The City of Auburn did not incur any expenditures. As a condition of the County’s funding, the Flood Control District requires a flood protection easement on the 41.5 acres. Resolution No. 5297 authorizes the Mayor to execute the flood protection easement that was a condition of County funding that the City Council agreed to as part of Council’s previous approval of Resolution No. 5160. As indicated in the body of the easement, the easement granted from the City of Auburn to King County would allow for the following: “A perpetual easement for the purposes of (1) accessing and constructing, inspecting, monitoring, reconstructing, maintaining and repairing, river bank protection, levees and/or other flood related works, including installing, inspecting and maintaining all vegetation and any other appurtenances thereto, (2) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, maintaining, locating and relocating utilities and stormwater facilities or improvements, and (3) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, maintaining, locating and relocation trail improvements across, in, under, on, over and upon the Easement Area.” Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Snyder 24 of 44 Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 25 of 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Resolution No. 5297 May 4, 2017 Page 1 RESOLUTION NO. 5 2 9 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE FLOOD PROTECTION EASEMENT FOR WHITE RIVER PROPERTIES WHEREAS, the City of Auburn City Council adopted Resolution No. 5160 on July 20, 2015, authorizing the purchase of approximately 41.5 acres of land from Puget Sound Energy along the W hite River, located north of Roegner Park; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn was awarded a fund allocation from the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund for the purchase price and real estate transaction costs; and WHEREAS, the King County Flood Control District Sub -Regional Opportunity Fund required that the fund allocation be supported with the establishment of a flood protection easement on the purchased property; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn purchased the 41.5 acres from Puget Sound Energy for $75,000.00 in August, 2015; and WHEREAS, the total purchase price and transaction costs for the acquisition of the property amounted to which $83,727.30, all of which is being requested from the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has prepared a flood protection easement suitable to meet the requirements of the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is authorized to execute the Flood Protection Easement to meet the requirements of the King County Flood Control District Sub-Regional Opportunity Fund in substantial conformity with the document attached hereto, marked as Exhibit “1” and Incorporated herein by this reference. 26 of 44 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Resolution No. 5297 May 4, 2017 Page 2 Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2017. CITY OF AUBURN _____________________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Danielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney 27 of 44 Page 1 / 7 EXHIBIT “1” TO RESOLUTION NO. 5297 Recording Requested By And When Recorded Mail To: King County Flood Control District Water and Lands Resources Division 201 S. Jackson St. Suite 600 Seattle, W A 98104-3 855 Attn: Brad Schabert FLOOD PROTECTION EASEMENT Grantor(s): The City of Auburn Grantee(s): King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington Short Legal: T21N, R05E, Sec 30: Ptn S1/2SE ¼ Assessor’s Property Tax Parcels: 665500-0025, 302105-9020-01 and 302105-HYDR THIS AGREEMENT made this _________ day of ___________________________ 2017, by and between The City of Auburn, hereinafter called the "Grantor", and King County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, hereinafter called the "Grantee": For valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor does hereby grant and convey to the Grantee, their successors and assigns, agents and licensees an easement for the purposes set forth herein, under, ov er and upon the property described on the Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Easement Area"), situated in King County, Washington . A perpetual easement for the purposes of (1) accessing and constructing, inspecting, monitoring, reconstructing, maintaining and repairing, river bank protection, levees and /or other flood related works, including installing, inspecting and maintaining all vegetation and any other appurtenances thereto, (2) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, maintaining, locating and relocating utilities and stormwater facilities or improvements, and (3) constructing, reconstructing, repairing, maintaining, locating and relocation trail improvements across, in, under, on, over and upon the Easement Area. Grantee shall have the right at such time as may be necessary and at the Grantee's sole discretion, to enter upon and to have unimpeded access to, in and through the Easement Area for the purposes of exercising the Grantee's rights as described herein. 28 of 44 Page 2 / 7 Grantor agrees not to plant non-native vegetation within the Easement Area and not to remove or otherwise alter any improvements installed by Grantee, including any native vegetation that may be planted and any flood protection works and trail improvements that may b e constructed, within the Easement Area, without the prior approval of Grantee. For the purposes of this river protection easement, the term "native vegetation" shall mean vegetation comprised of plant species, other than noxious weeds (as identified on the State of Washington noxious weed list found at Washington Administrative Code Chapter 16-750, as amended from time to time), which are indigenous to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest and which reasonably could have been expected to naturally occur at the site. Neither Grantor nor Grantee are hereby obligated to future maintenance, repair or other action related to the above-described exercise of easement rights, except that Grantee shall maintain and repair any trails constructed by Grantee within the Easement Area. This river protection easement and/or any flood related works constructed or to be constructed within the Easement Area shall not be construed as granting any rights to any third person or entity, or as a guarantee of any protection from flooding or flood damage, and nothing contained herein shall be construed as waiving any immunity to liability granted to Grantor or Grantee by any state statute, including Chapters 86.12 and 86.15 of the Revised Code of Washington, or as otherwise granted or provided for by law. The rights, conditions, and provisions of this easement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, and successors in interest and assigns of Grantor and Grantee. WITNESSETH, the said Grantor(s) have hereunto signed their names the day and year first above written. GRANTOR: THE CITY OF AUBURN, a municipal corporation. By _____________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ GRANTEE: KING COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Washington. By _____________________________________ Title: ___________________________________ 29 of 44 Page 3 / 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss: COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of City of Auburn, a municipal corporation to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ___________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at_____________________ My appoint expires_______________ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss: COUNTY OF KING ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that _he is authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the of the Department of Natural Resources and Parks of King County to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated: ___________________________________________ Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at_____________________ My appoint expires_______________ 30 of 44 Page 4 / 7 Exhibit “A” Legal Description “Easement Area” PARCEL A: Those portions of Lots 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, The Parker Homestead, according to the plat thereof recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, Page 51, in King County, Washington, situated within the northwest quarter of Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., and lying northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the north quarter corner of Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M.; thence south 89°49’20" west along the north line of said section 127.71 feet; thence south 41°20’16" west 1,436.51 feet; thence south 44°01’28" west 196.05 feet to a point on the easterly limit of said Lot 12; thence continuing along the inside top of dike south 44°01’28" west 18.98 feet; thence south 16°10’48" west 151.59 feet; thence south 46°28’52" west 115.24 feet; thence south 26°27’43" west 246.55 feet; thence south 63°21’45" west to the east boundary of the westerly 500 feet of said Lot 14; thence southwesterly along the south bank of the White (Stuck) River to a point on the west line of said Section 31, distant 359 feet north of the west quarter corner of said section, said point being the terminus of line description; EXCEPT that portion lying within that certain parcel of land conveyed to the City of Auburn for Ta-Weel Memorial Park (Roegner Park), by deed recorded under Recording No. 8906290993; ALSO EXCEPT that portion lying northwesterly of the following described line: Commencing at the northwest corner of said Section 31; thence south 00°45’10" west along the west line of said section a distance of 30 feet; thence south 89°54’03" east, parallel to the north line of said section, a distance of 240.15 feet; thence south 00°28’27" west, parallel to the east margin of "A" Street Southeast right-of-way (Old P.S.H. No. 5), a distance of 200 feet; thence north 89°54’03" west 200 feet to the east margin of said street; thence south 00°28’27" west along said margin 725.43 feet to a point of curvature to the right, having a radius of 985 feet, the radial center of which bears north 89°31’33" west; thence southwesterly along said curve a distance of 302.53 feet; thence south 00°45’10" west 54.22 feet; thence south 89°14’50" east 50 feet; thence south 00°45’10" west 471.82 feet; thence south 39º09’59" east a distance of 70 feet; thence south 50º50’01" west a distance of 123.76 feet to the west line of said Section 31, and the 31 of 44 Page 5 / 7 TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of line description; thence north 50º50’01" east 123.76 feet; thence north 39º09’59" west 70 feet; thence north 50°50’01" east 1,081.81 feet; thence north 42°30’49" east 376.31 feet; thence north 33°31’10" east 581.74 feet; thence north 32°29’39" east 173.71 feet; thence north 36°51’24" east 242.90 feet to a point on the north line of said Lot 5, and the terminus of line description PARCEL B: Lot 1, City of Auburn Short Plat No. SP-1-83, recorded under Recording No. 8305120301, being a portion of the south half of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; EXCEPT that portion thereof lying northerly and northwesterly of Lot 2 of said Short Plat; (ALSO KNOWN AS a portion of Parcel B, City of Auburn Lot Line Adjustment No. LLA-0011- 92, recorded under Recording No. 9209281726). PARCEL C-1: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying westerly of a line 720 feet east of the west line of said southwest quarter of the southeast quarter; EXCEPT that portion lying northerly of the following described "Line A", conveyed to M. A. Segale, Inc. by deed recorded under Recording No. 8804220524; ALSO EXCEPT that portion lying southeasterly of the following described "Line B", conveyed to Roland A. Crabtree by deed recorded under Recording No. 8502250557: "Line A": Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; thence south 00º00’55" east along the east line of said subdivision, 252.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of line description; thence north 88º50’59" west 260.56 feet; thence south 77º58’54" west 528.41 feet; thence south 53º53’37" west 589.25 feet; thence south 49º19’56" west 91.35 feet, more or less, to the west line of the southeast quarter of said Section 30, and the terminus of line description. 32 of 44 Page 6 / 7 "Line B": Commencing at the south one-quarter corner of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; thence south 89º49’20" west along the south line of said section 127.71 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of line description; thence along the inside top of the southeast dike line of the White (Stuck) River, north 41º20’15" east 100.75 feet; thence north 44º31’40" east 514.79 feet; thence north 52º19’08" east 155.42 feet; thence north 45º55’37" east 218.52 feet; thence north 71º03’35" east 92.23 feet to the east line of the west 720 feet of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of said Section 30 and the terminus of line description. PARCEL C-2: That portion of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington, lying easterly of a line 720 feet east of the west line of said southwest quarter of the southeast quarter, and lying northerly of the northerly line of Oravetz Road, as conveyed to King County by deed recorded under Recording No. 19991207001436 (which deed supersedes instrument recorded under Recording No. 4926236); EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Auburn by Deed recorded under Recording No. 9201100939, and rerecorded under Recording No. 20150807002155; ALSO EXCEPT that portion lying northerly of the following described line, conveyed to M. A. Segale, Inc. by deed recorded under Recording No. 8804220524: Commencing at the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 30, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, W.M., in King County, Washington; thence south 00º00’55" east along the east line of said subdivision, 252.35 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of line description; thence north 88º50’59" west 260.56 feet; thence south 77º58’54" west 528.41 feet; thence south 53º53’37" west 589.25 feet; thence south 49º19’56" west 91.35 feet, more or less, to the west line of the southeast quarter of said Section 30, and the terminus of line description. Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#’s 6655000025, 3021059020, 302105HYDR 33 of 44 Page 7 / 7 PARCEL D That portion of Southeast 41st Street vacated by operation of law per RCW 36.87.090 and described in Opinion Number 2016-1, Opinion of the City Attorney of Auburn, Washington, dated August 17, 2016, said description described as follows: That portion of Southeast 41st Street, being a right of way 30 feet in width, according to the Plat of the Parker Homestead, recorded in Volume 8 of Plats, Page 51, in King County, Washington situated within the Northwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 21 North, Range 5 East, Willamette Meridian, and described as follows: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 31; thence south a distance of 30 feet along the east line of said Plat to the northeast corner of lot 7 of said plat, also being a point on the south margin of Southeast 41st Street; thence west a distance of 886.2 feet, more or less, along the north lines of lot 7, lot 6 and lot 5 of said Plat to the Northeast corner of Tract C of City of Auburn Lot Line Adjustment LLA-5-87 recorded under King County Recording Number 8704220781; thence northeasterly a distance of 127.6 feet, more or less, to the most southwest corner of parcel B of City of Auburn Lot Line Adjustment LLA-0011-92, recorded under King County Recording Number 9209281726, also being a point on the north line of said Section 31; thence east a distance of 762.3 feet, more or less, along said north line of Section 31 to the Point of Beginning. 34 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Airport Jet A Fuel Proposal (10 Minutes) (Snyder) Date: September 6, 2017 Department: CD & PW Attachments: Private Partnership Option Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: Over the past 8 months, the Airport Advisory Board has been discussing the options for providing Jet A Fuel to Airport customers. It is anticipated that the demand for Jet A Fuel at the Airport will increase after the completion of the Runway Enhancements that are currently under design and anticipated to be constructed in 2018/2019. The Capital Facilities Plan includes the improvement of a permanent Jet A Fuel Tank after the completion of the Runway. There is currently one tenant at the Airport that has a need to provide Jet A fuel to their customers. The Board considered several options for providing Jet A Fuel on a temporary basis until the permanent tank can be built by the Airport in a future year. Those options included a Public/Private Partnership and a Private Partnership. After significant discussion, the Airport Board, at their August 23, 2017 meeting made the recommendation to the City Council to proceed with the Private Partnership option. The details of this option are attached. Staff will be looking for concurrence from the City Council with the Board’s recommendation so that negotiation of an Operating Agreement between the private entity, Cascade, and the City may be completed. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Staff:Snyder Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 35 of 44 36 of 44 1 AUBURN AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD BRIEFING FOR AUGUST 23, 2017 PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROPOSAL AMG proposes a two (2) phase approach to implementation of Jet A Fuel at the Airport by a Private Entity as follows: Phase One · Enter into an Agreement between the City of Auburn and Cascade to allow Cascade to utilize their current truck (2,000 gallons) to provide their customers with Jet A fuel o This will require the determination of the location and any containment needed that would be provided by Cascade at their expense. o This allows for minimal investment to start providing Jet A for current customer needs at Cascade. o Terms of the Agreement would cover the responsibilities of Cascade and the City including such things as insurance, containment and spill response, flowage fees, and how and when fuel can be provided to others that are not Cascade’s customers. o Completion by first quarter 2018 Phase Two · At such time that the demand for Jet A exceeds what Cascade’s existing truck can provide, Enter into an Agreement between the City of Auburn and AMG to provide a second larger truck (5,000 Gallons) at AMG’s expense. o Efficiencies include volume fuel delivers for better pricing and availability. When reaching 40,000-gallon Jet A annual fuel sales, market need and demand will be established. o This allows minimal investment to begin providing Jet A for customers of the Airport and not just Cascade. o Terms of the Agreement would cover the responsibilities of AMG and the City including such things as insurance, containment and spill response, flowage fees, operating requirements and maintenance. o Anticipated to be implement after the Runway Enhancement is completed in 2019 Phase One and Two would establish the need for the Jet A fuel service without any financial risk on the part of the Airport. Once needs are established that can support the installation of a City owned above ground tank of 15,000 gallons, the City would install the tank and enter into an Operating Agreement for the fueling service similar to the current AVGAS profit sharing agreement. Respectively submitted and prepared by Aviation Management Group 2017 37 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Proposed King County Modular Housing Project (Hinman) (15 Minutes) Date: September 6, 2017 Department: Administration Attachments: Blokable Project Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Feasibility is underway for potential placement of between 6 and 15 modular housing units, approximately 200 square feet each, on available land controlled by Valley Cities, adjacent to Phoenix Rising facility. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Staff: Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 38 of 44 WHAT IF... We could help our neighbors off of the street? A publi c pri vate partnershi p between Ki ng County, the Ci ty of Auburn and Valley Ci ti es WE CAN... BRINGING ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING, ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNOLOGY TOGETHER • Feasibility is underway for potential placement of between 6 and 15 modular housing units, approximately 200 square feet each, on available land controlled by Valley Cities, adjacent to Phoenix Rising facility. • City, County Assessor, Valley Cities, Blokable Modular Housing, and Keimig architect would work together to conduct site feasibility.  Timeline for these actions is being developed. • Blokable team would work with Valley Cities’ architect to develop the site layout, with costing, for current zoning at 6 units, and alternate for 15 units if zoning allows. • Valley Cities would gather quotes to do site work and hook ups. • This would allow basic budgeting, in order to move forward. • County Assessor would work with Auburn to secure financing.  State capital budget, when approved in December, will have $3 million potentially available to purchase housing units. City and County Assessor would work together to pursue sources for ongoing operating costs. • City would assist in streamlining permits and other approvals. 39 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Human Services Funding Parameters(Hinman) Date: September 6, 2017 Department: Administration Attachments: Funding Parameters Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: The human services focus areas are decades old and have been under review by Auburn City Council and Human Services staff. The new focus areas are proposed changes and updates to the focus areas and human services funding approach that better reflects the community’s current needs and opportunities increase service capacity. Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 40 of 44 Health and Human Services 8/24/17 The human services focus areas are decades old and have been under review by Auburn City Council and Human Services staff. The new focus areas listed below are proposed changes and updates to the focus areas and human services funding approach that better reflects the community’s current needs and opportunities increase service capacity.  Current areas of focus: poverty reduction, child abuse and neglect, domestic violence and sexual assault and health care.  Proposed new areas of focus o Diversion  Rental assistance  Arears  Eviction prevention support o Food  Emergency food  Food delivery  Meals o Healthcare  Special needs  Dental  Glasses  Mental Health The new proposed focus areas will be presented to the City of Auburn Human Services Committee for feedback. A new tiered system was also discussed to better support providers in Auburn who serve residents in need. The three tiers include:  Capital projects  Direct services  CDBG 41 of 44 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Matrix Date: September 6, 2017 Department: City Attorney Attachments: Matrix Key Budget Impact: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Background Summary: Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Staff: Meeting Date:September 11, 2017 Item Number: 42 of 44 Updated August 21, 2017 NO.TOPIC Chair STAFF LEAD(S)STUDY SESSION REVIEW DATE(S) COUNCIL DISCUSSION SUMMARY ACTION DATE 2 Capital Projects Update and Featured Capital Project Discussion Chair Wagner Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder TBD 3 Community Sustainability Series: Economic and Statutory Considerations for Municipalities Chair Wagner Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder Rescheduled for later this year 4 IT Update on Digital Parity Chair Wagner Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Haugan 10/09/2017 5 Code Enforcement Presentation Chair Wagner Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 10/9/2017 6 Property at 104th and 102nd Chair Wagner Vice Chair DaCorsi Director Snyder 10/9/2017 7 Business Shopping Carts Chair Peloza Vice Chair Baggett Director Snyder 10/23/2017 9 Police Calls for Mental Health Issues Chair Peloza Vice Chair Baggett Chief Lee 10/23/2017 11 Third Quarter Financial Report Chair Baggett Vice Chair Wagner Director Coleman TBD 16 Legal Rights for Undocumented Residents Chair Trout-Manuel Vice Chair Wales Director Hinman future meeting 17 CDBG Grant Parameters Chair Trout-Manuel Vice Chair Wales 9/11/2017 COUNCIL MATRIX 43 of 44 Revised 06-12-2017 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES FINANCE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC WORKS & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING CITY BUDGET & AMENDMENTS UTILITIES POLICE PUBLIC WELLNESS RISK MANAGEMENT ZONING, CODES & PERMITS SCORE JAIL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES EQUIPMENT RENTAL INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY DISTRICT COURT HOMELESSNESS SERVICES FACILITIES TRANSPORTATION PARKS & RECREATION AFFORDABLE HOUSING CITY REAL PROPERTY STREETS ANIMAL CONTROL COMMUNITY SERVICES LEGAL ENGINEERING SOLID WASTE HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES CAPITAL PROJECTS EMERGENCY PLANNING MEDICAL COMMUNITY RELATIONS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SUSTAINABILITY AIRPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AIRPORT BUSINESSES CULTURAL ARTS & PUBLIC ARTS SISTER CITIES PLANNING MULTIMEDIA Councilmember Trout-Manuel, Chair Councilmember Baggett, Chair Councilmember Wagner, Chair Councilmember Peloza, Chair Deputy Mayor Wales, Vice Chair Councilmember Wagner, Vice Chair Councilmember DaCorsi, Vice Chair Councilmember Baggett, Vice Chair 2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES 2017 MEETING DATES March 13, 2017 March 27, 2017 April 10, 2017 April 24, 2017 May 8, 2017 May 22, 2017June 12, 2017 June 12, 2017May 22, 2017 June 26, 2017 July 10, 2017 July 24, 2017August 14, 2017 August 14, 2017July 24, 2017 August 28, 2017 September 11, 2017 September 25, 2017 October 9, 2017 October 23, 2017 November 13, 2017 November 27, 2017 December 11, 2017 December 26, 2017 SPECIAL FOCUS AREAS 44 of 44