HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-28-2010 Special ,. , . � j kf�Jk i> .. a
^� i! ` - ' �' 1���
� :, �.}✓� � I `.
,`�v, .�`.I�.F:
' 1.- ' ��, . .h .
_� ti ��."� :'
J� `�T�t.�,y " ',
f
r ' ��
.> � �^b�'"�4
� �iY .� �� � = °.:�. •
'� ..
�
.,, i�'�� '�� w� � �� . �� . , '
;'`r
r r,. , � � �„
� ' e �J .
. �,f;'yrf'oyj � .l�'S ` �� ' �
i ,,y,�,;: '.
�� .;f� .r I�r�itl,' 7i7'k' y��y!
� �e.�� 11 1 1 4�"�� 1
���(� �
�d i . �'vsfr;�,�i� „ '4�\� •
'�, ,`c , � ��� a�;
�� ,
� ".:
� ,� �� ,
� �i.w,,,k,,�
II � �'.-! �At sl
__ - ..:i.�n _
'4 �:9'/� � li �- '-.Lr�_
Q wi i
�
's a
F I i _.
�i �.
' _ .,s-
,{�-
a P�
� ii
�. . � � � y
M, ' pt� 1 i� .�;;��i
Vt. \�. . ., "� � �� 'M.[ '�.
i1 Tj �'�,
' ).
FFf(� ,�" + �. 1� �i . . ��
y •
�• . c.�.
i
r� � •
��� �� ` -
� : � • 1 1
�
. . �
ra�,,». �.,.,. � �= �
✓� �� '
,� �� r: ., � • ► � � �
.�� ,`; �� � I I ' • •
'�:
,..;S..J. - .
r-t' .V A'. ji
I
CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT � Oct. 28 & 29, 2010 Auburn Golf Course Clubhouse
Thursday, October 28 (Council, Mayor, Staff attending. Participation varies by agenda item)
8-8:30am ContinentalBreakfast—Optionalattendance
830-8:35 am Call the meeting to order: Mayor's Welcome and introductions--Sue Singer, Deputy Mayor
8:35-8:50 am Pre-retreat planning—Rich Wagner, Ch. Council Operations Committee
8:50—9:15 am Discuss strategies and the visioning process—Rich, Sue, Nancy Backus
9:15-10:15 am Broad visioning discussion (Councilmembers participate) --Greg facilitates
30:15—1035 am Break
10:35—12 pm Continue Broad Visioning Council Discussion -- Greg facilitates
12—12:45 pm Lunch
12:45—2:30 pm Detail discussion, selected goals, incl. staff participation -- Greg facilitates
Goal U Ensure that Auburn is a safe and secure place to live or have a business
Goal T Promote stability in neighborhoods and the downtown
Goals 5, H Continue efforts to partner with, fund and enhance human services Develop one-stop multi-
service center
Goal J Consider an Auburn Housing Authority
Goals 20, 21,Z Revitalize and redevelop Urban Center with extended areas
• Create medical/ hospital zone
• Review zoning codes in Urban Center to allow increased development/density
Goal E Institute inner city shuttle service
Goal C Preserve former Carnegie Library and former post office
230-2:45 pm Break
2:45-4:30 pm Continued discussion, selected goals-- Greg facilitates
Goal 17 Develop Environmental Park
Goal 23 Develop environmental building, commercial and technology in the Green Zone adjacent to the
Auburn Environmental Park (AEP) including rezone
Goal 32 Develop Community Center at Les Gove Park
Goal Q Work toward unification of new communities with centralized communication and outreach to
bring them into the existing community
Goals 14, 1D Development of airport area, including runway extension, new commercial area and new
entrances on 'B' St. and 'D'St. Study feasibility of relocating the airport to the Academy area
Goal 36 Create Auburn Way South Redevelopment Plan
Goal O Continue to seek opportunities to partner and work with the Muckleshoot Tribe
Goal G Encourage public art on downtown buildings (discuss entire cultural arts program)
Goals P, R Promote continuous community outreach by involving citizens and businesses in their City
government
Goal W Improve animal control
430 pm Adjourn
Friday,October 29th (Council, Mayor, Staff attending. Participation varies by agenda item) ,
8-8:30 am Continental Breakfast—Optional attendance
8:30-8:45 am Description of the goal prioritization process-Greg Prothman, Facilitator
8:45-9:15 am Follow up discussion of vision, strategies and goals--Greg facilitates
9:15-10:15 am "Dots" prioritization of goals-Councilmembers only
10:15-1030am Break
30:30-12 pm Discuss results of prioritization-- Greg facilitates
12-12:45pm Lunch
12:45—2 pm Outcome-based budgeting process (overview only) Mayor Lewis and Shelley Coleman
2 pm Adjourn
Tab 01 -agendaretreat2010.doc.doc 10/20/10 9:10 am rew Page 1 of 1
I
2010 City Council Vision 2030 Retreat Attendees
Mayor/CounciL•
Mayor Lewis Mayor
Nancy Backus Councilmember
Virginia Haugen Councilmember
Lynn Norman Councilmember
John Partridge Councilmember
Bill Peloza Councilmeinber
Sue Singer Gouncilmember
Rich Wagner Councilmember
Directors:
Dan Heid City Attorney
Dennis Dowdy Pu61ic Works Director
Shelley Coleman Finance Director
Brenda Heineman Director of HR/Risk & Property Mgmt.
Lorrie Rempher IS Director
Daryl Faber Parks;Arts & Recreation Director
Daryl Faber Planning & Development
Bob Lee Police Chief
Staff:
Michael Hursh Community Services Manager
Dana Hinman Public Affairs Manager
Carolyn Robertson Govemment Relations Manager
CathyRictiardson Deputy City Clerk
Tamie Bothell Executive Assistant to Mayor
Facilitator:
Greg Prothman Facilitator and President of Prothman Company
.
CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT AGENDA AV BUIlLV
TH U RS DAY .,,,�� ,���N r�„��M����t��
8:30 -- 8:35 Call the meeting to order, introductions -- Sue Singer, Deputy Mayor
8:35 - 8:50 Pre-retreat planning - Rich Wagner, Ch. Council Operations Committee
8:50 - 9:15 Discuss strategies and the visioning process - Rich, Sue, Nancy Backus
9:15 - 10:15 Broad visioning discussion (Councilmembers particpate) -- Greg facilitates
10:15 - 10:35 Break
10:35 - 12:00 Continue Broad Visioning Council Discussion -- Greg facilitates
12:00 - 12:45 Lunch
12:45 - 2:30 Detail discussion, selected goals, incl. staff participation -- Greg facilitates
2:30 - 2:45 Break
2:45 - 4:30 Continued discussion, selected goals -- Greg facilitates
4:30 Adjourn
FRIDAY
8:00 -- 8:30 Continental Breakfast- Optional attendance
8:30 -- 8:45 Description of the goal prioritization process -Greg Prothman, Facilitator
8:45 -- 9:15 Follow up discussion of vision, strategies and goals -- Greg facilitates
9:15 - 10:15 ��Dots" prioritization of goals - Councilmembers only
10:15 - 10:30 Break
10:30 - 12:00 Discuss results of prioritization -- Greg facilitates
12:00 - 12:45 Lunch
12:45 - 2:00 Outcome-based budgeting process (overview only) -- Mayor Lewis and
Finance Director Shelley Coleman
2:00 pm Adjourn
�
k
PRE - RETREAT PLANNING AUBUIt1V
BY THE COUNCIL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE (COC)
Presented by Rich Wagner, COC Chair ,,,,�1"'^"1°���MA�,�t��
• For the past 9 years, annual retreats have mostly focused on budgets and goals
• The COC felt Council needs to spend some time on its long term vision for the City
• After doing that visioning, Council needs to prioritize its goals
• 64 goals are currently on the updated City Vision 2016 map, which does
not include any water, sewer, storm drainage or solid waste goals
• To focus on the most important goals to be discussed, Councilmembers "voted",
on a scale of 1 to 3 (high), for each of the 64 goals. Votes were not intended to imply
support or opposition for particular goals, just which ones they wanted to discuss.
• With 7 Councilmembers voting, the highest possible goal total would be 7x3=21
• The COC considered for discussion the goals with totals of 11 or more
• There were 36, too many to discuss in detail at the retreat, so 10 transportation
goals were discussed at the Committee of the Whole on August 30th.
• The COC felt that a necessary part of visioning is to identify key strategies
that support the City's current Vision and Mission Statements
• 5 key strategies were developed by the COC and each goal was assigned to
the strategy area where it has the most influence, even though many of the
goals affect more than one strategy area.
• The 3 members of the COC will be presenting these 5 strategies later in the agend�
and Councilmembers are invited to suggest amendments to them.
� � �
Examples of Vision, Mission, Stratepies and Goals (Goals are Tactics for Implementation)
AuBURtv
� Seahawks Football Team City of Auburn """'°""'°�^��`°
(Rich Wagner's version) (Vision and Mission adopted 1997)
�� ��
CAs a football team that represents the Northwest United States� /As a city of regional significance, proud of its small town heritag�
J`c;��� the Seattle Seahawks will always strive to win the Super Bowl, � as well as the diversity of its people and neighborhoods,
making their fans proud to be associated with them. \Auburn offers an opportunity for people of all ages to enjoy life.
�—� ���� �� ����
,� To provide a sports venue that meets the entertainment needs To provide a service-oriented government that meets the needs
�`y5�� of a diverse audience through exciting performances, professional of our citizens and business community through e�cient
behavior, and ethical business practices. and professional management with responsive and accessible leadership.
a�e�`e6 Defense Health Respect "One Auburn" Qualfty Lfvability
�j<t Big Plays Experience Sustainability Partnerships
Excercises Provide Team Community Public art Medical
for strength meals meetings Center powntown Zone
oa�5 yl Draft top More trades, Develop Service
�j aG��p quarterbacks fewer drafts Green Zone Clubs
�
Pay defensive Manage Open Redevelop SOS & Arterial City Hall
coaches well sleep discussions Urban Center pavement Plaza
Surprise Retain older High density Muckleshoot
plays players zoning Tribe
Council Operetions Committee(COC)Sept.9-00,2010 Retreat Agenda Planning updated en2no 12:15 pm Rich Wagner
"Agenda planning is based on the City Vision adopted in 1997 and ihe Vision 20161ist of goals thal has been developed by the City Council over ihe past ten years.
Vision for Auburn's future:
As a city of regional signifcance,proud of its smail town hentage,as well as ihe
dfversity of i�s people and neigh6orhoods,Aubum offers an opporfurrty for
people of all ages to enjoy life.
'Councilmembers"voted"for each Vision 2016 goal,giving i�a 0, 1.2 or 3(high)for the importance of discussing il at lhe Council Retreat and sugges�ed new goals.
'The COC def ned the fve stretegies below and assigned each goal�o one of them,even ihough some goals cross over into several sirategy defniniions.
(a)"One Aubum"r A sirong sense of community,allowing all people to appreciate each Ihmugh celebration and working together to solve probiems cooperatively.
(b)Sustainability:Economic viability,coupled with environmen�al stewardship,while planning and acting for our future.
(c)Quality:Striving tor�he besl in people.projects and services. Note:
(d)Partnerships:Continually seeking and main�aining productive relationships with our intemal and external partners. shaded:no Councilmem6er vote,so the
................
(d)Liva6ility.Providing a safe and desirable community. COC used a 1 for total vote calculalion
line 2016 Goal�escription COC Agenda Recommendation Strategy StaWs Total Nancv vir��o�a �v�n �onn ain sue rzicn
ref# ref# Votes
1 U Ensure[hat Aubum is a safe and secure place to live or have a business Retreat agenda,update,discuss Livability progress 19 3 3 3 3 2 3 2
__........ ...... .............. .................... ..... ......... . .. ........... .................. .._....__...... ,.. . ........ ____.. ._'__. ___.... ....._........... ._ .............. ...,.,........ .._.... ... ......... ... ............ ..........
2 12 Complete A!B Street corritlor and develop adjacent areas COW agentla Sustainabiliry progress 1B 3 1 3 3 3 2 3
........... ... . . ................ ................ ... .... ........... . ................. ...... ........._ ... ................. .. . . ...... ........... . . ......... ......... . _........ . ... .... ......... _ .._... ......... ......... .........
3 20 Revitalize and redevelop Urban Center with extended areas Retreat,update,tliscuss w/goal2,21 "One Aubum' progress 18 3 1 3 3 2 3 3
._......... ... ........_...... ................... ... .......... . .............. ..._...._ .. .............. .,,.,. . . ....... ._..._...... . . ......... ....._.......... ............ . .,,........_. _ .. .......... .......... ..........
4 A Con6nued commi�ment to SOS Program COW agentla quality progress 18 3 1 3 2 3 3 3
......_.... ._ .. .......__..... . ......_.. .................. _.........._.... ._.........._. . ............. _......... _.__ ,,........ . ................. .._..... ........... ,,,�,......... .. ............ . ............... ..............
5 1 Pursue s[reet bond to brinq all arterials to a�Ieast 70%condition index rating COw agenda Quality progress 18 3 1 3 3 2 3 3
............ ... ... ............... .............. ......._....._ ......... ......... .. . ......... . . ............ .... ..... ......... ......... . .. . ..._........ . ......... .......... ............... ............. ..... .... ......... ......_. .........
6 5 Continue efforts[o pahner with,fund and enhance human services Retreat,update,discuss wl goal H Partnerships progress 18 3 3 3 2 3 2 2
...... ... .. ............. ... . ............... . . . ............. . . .... ......... .......... . ............. . . ...... ......... .. .............. ......... ......... ........... .............. .. .. . ......... .......... .........
7 T Promote stability in neighborhoods and the dowMown Retreat agenda,update,discuss Livability progress 1 B 3 1 3 3 3 3 2
. ..................................................................................._.. ...................................................................._..............._.................................... .......................... .................. ............... .....,,,..,... ............... ....._........ ........................._ ..............
............ ............ .................................._..............................................................,... ... .
e C Preserve former Carnegie Library and former post office ftetreat agenda,update,discuss pualiry progress 17 2 3 3 3 1 3 2
....... ....... ............. .. .._........._.. .. ............ .. ............... .................. . .. ............ ... ............... ......._. ..... ............. ......... __......... ............. , .......... .. ............. ........... . .........
9 2 Development of the Robertson I Valley�rive-in properties COw agenaa Sustainability progress 16 3 7 3 2 2 2 3
._.... ... ..... ............. ............... ..... ............. . ... ......... .... .. ............ ,. . . .. ....... .._........_.... ......... .. . ......... ......... ...._...... ........ ._. ..,,,.,,,, .. ._............ . .._..... .........
10 77 Develop Environmental Park Retreatagentla,update,discuss Sustainability pmgress 16 3 1 9 2 2 3 2
.._... ... . . ........... . ....... ....... .. .......... . . ......... . . ......... . . . . ........ . ................. ......... . .. ................ . .. . ......... ........... .......,,,,, .... . ....,.,,,,,,... .. ... ...,........... ......... ...........
11 32 Develop Community Center at Les Gove Park fietreat agentla,update,tliscuss "One Aubum" progress 16 3 1 3 2 3 1 3
..._. ... .. ............ . .. . . .. .. ..... .. . ......... ......... . . .......... . . .._........._.. . .. ,,. ........ ......._. ........ ........... ............. ._._.._ ............ .... _ . .....,,,.... _ ._. ............_ ......... ..........
12 21 Creale medical I hospital mne Reheat,update,diswss wlgoals Z,20 Livability progress 15 2 1 2 2 3 3 2
....... ... ... ............... ... .................... ... ......... .. ............ . ... ........... .. .. ......... ...._....... .... ......._. . ........... . ..... ............ ........... ..... .... ,.,.,,, .. _.. .... ..___. ....__. ...........
13 p3 Develop envimnmental building,commercial and lechnology in the Green Zone Retreatagenda,update,discuss Sustainability future 15 3 1 2 2 2 2 3
adjacent to the Aubum Environmental Park(AEP)inciuding rezone
........ ... . ................. ... ....__....... ............... ................ ... .. ...._........ ... .... ......... ............... ......... .......... . . ......... .......... ................. . ..........,.,.. .. ...._.. .......... ......... .........
14 K Improve lighfing for pedestrian safety COW aqenda Livability progress 15 2 1 3 3 2 3 1
....... ... ............. .....__ ................ .... .._...._.... ... ............... ........._ ......... _........__... _..._.__ ._......... ....._._ ___.. _ ........,.... .. ___...... ....... . . ........ . ...........
15 O Continue to seek opportunities lo partner and work with Ihe Muckleshoot Indian Retreat agenda,update,discuss Partnerships progress 15 3 1 2 2 3 3 1
Tribe
. .. _........................................_........................................................................_................................................. ._.._._...._.......__..._.......................................................................__................ .......................... .................._...........................�,. ............... ............... ............... ............... ...............
........................ ....................
�fi Q Work toward unifcation of new communi[ies with centralized communication and Retreat a enda,u date,discuss "One Aubum"
outreach�o bring them into the existing community 9 P progress 15 3 7 3 0 3 2 3
........... ... ................. .... .. ............ ................. _............ . .................. . . , ........... ................ ........ . ......... ......... . ............ ......... .. ........... ..... .........,. .. ........ .......... . .. ............... .,,.........
n Z Review zoning codes in Urban Center to allow increased tlevelopmenVdensity Ratreat,update,discuss w/goals Z,20 Sustainability progress 14 2 7 3 2 2 1 3
...... _. ......_.._... ____. ....._............ ............ .............. ..._..........._ .......... ........_.. ..............._. ._.____.. ..........._ ___. _ ......_....,. .. __....___. .... . ............. ...............
�e �4 Development of airport area,including mnway e�etension,new commercial area Retreat,upaate,aiscuss w/goal 1D Sustainability future 14 1 1 2 3 3 3 1
and new enVances on'B'St.and'D'St.
............ ... .................. ... ............... ............. ..........._ . ................. .. . ............... ........_.... .... .......... ......... . ......___...._ ... .. ........ .. ...._............... ......... .. ......... ......... . . , ......... . .........
19 36 Create Aubum Way South Redevelopment Plan Retreat agentla,upaate,diswss Sustainability future 14 3 7 2 2 1 3 2
._.... ._ . ........ ........ .......... .............__. _..... ........_... ,.......... ..........._._. ,................. . ......... . ............ ......... .. ......... ...... .......... .. ....... ........... ,..... ... ......... .,,, .........
20 L Continue efforts to make Aubum's Urban Center more pedestrian friendly COw agenda Livability progress 14 3 7 3 2 2 1 2
......_.... ............ ._........................................................._.........._................................_.._......................_......................._............................. ..................._..............................................................................................._..... .......................... .................. ............... ............... ._.......... ............... ......._...... ..._.......... ...............
21 28 Compleie Ci[y Hall Plaza Council Comminee agendas LivaGility progress 13 3 1 3 0 3 1 2
. ...... ... .. .............. . .... ......... . ........_.... . . ....._....... ......... ........ . ......... .. ............... ....... .. .... ......... . .......... . .........
22 M Improve and ezpantl public parking opportunities Council Committee agendas Lrvabiliry progress 13 2 1 2 2 2 2 2
...... ... .............. ........_., ........... , . ._........ ........... ......... ........_ .......... ......... ... ......... ... .......... .. ......... .. . ......... . .......... .........
21 22 Complete M Sireetunderpass COWa9enda Livability �progress 13 3 1 3 0 2 1 3
�iof3
line 2016 Goal Description COC Age. :commendation SVategy Status To�al Nancy w�9inia �ynn �on� sue rticn
reFq ref# Votes
22 30 �nUude the area on Auburn Way So.from'F'St.to 12th Sl.in Les Gove Counc�i Commi«ee agendas Livability progress 13 2 1 3 1 1 2 3
Community Campus
........ .... . ......... . . ..._...... ......... ....... .... ...,...... ............ . ......... ._.. ............. . . .....,....... ......._......... .....,......... . .... ..... . ........ ..... ............._ ... ................ ..
23 E InstiNte inner city shuttle service Relreat agenda,update,tliscuss Liva6ility progress 13 1 3 3 2 2 1 1
......... ... .................. .............. .... ..... ......... .,,. . ......... .. .. ..,....... ............ . ....____..... .,..,.,,. ......... .,, .,, ,,.......... ............... . .........,._.... .... ..... . ..... ... ............... . ....... .. ......... .........
24 G Encourage public art on downtown buildings Retreat,update,eiscuss cultural arts Quality progress 13 3 1 3 2 2 1 1
........... ... .. .. .............. .......... __......._..... ........ ......... . .. ........... .. .. ......... .................... ......... .. . ......... ................ ........,... ............... . , ...... ... . ............... . ...,,,,, . ......... ...............
Z5 P Pmmo[e wn[inuous community outreach by involving citizens and businesses in Retreat,uvdate,discuss w! oal R "One Auburn"
fheir City government 9 progress 13 3 1 3 1 3 0 2
.......... ... _........ ......__... ... .. ._.......... .................. ...........__....... ... ......... .._..... ......... ......... __.__ ...... ............ ...... ..... __.. . ........... ...._.. . ... . .............. .............
26 R Promote pnde in Aubum-Ifs More Than You Imagined Retreat,update,discuss wlgoal P "One Auburn" progress 13 3 1 3 0 3 1 2
. ....... ... ................ . . ............. ..........._... ......_..... ..................,. . ........... . ,............. ............... . . ........._. ..... ............. .................. .... ..... ...., .......... ... .._ ... .......... . . .. ......... .........
2� V Integrate public efforts with efforts of service clubs and faith community COW agenda Partnerships progress 13 2 1 3 2 3 1 1
. ....._ ... .............. ...._..... ...._... ........... . . .. ........... .............. ......__. .___. ....__...... ... ............... _............... ......... ._. ........... ... ...... ........... . ............ ...............
28 � Complete gateway projec[s Council Committee agendas Quality progress 12 2 1 2 3 2 1 1
...._... ... _..._.. .___ ......... __._ _.........._... .............. . ................. _._. _...... ..... .........._. . .... .... ......... ...... .......... . ..........,... ... __. .. .,,....... . ., ............. ............
z9 B Provide f ber optic corridor throughout ihe downtown,6eginning with[he AEP Council Committee a endas Qualit
Green Zone 9 y progress 12 2 1 3 1 2 1 2
............ ... ._.............. ......._...... ............. ........ ............ .. . . . ......... _......._....... ......... .......... . ................ ...................... . .... ........_ ............. ,.,..... _. .............. . .........,.. .........
3o W Impmve animal coniml Retreat agenaa,upeate,discuss Liva6ili[y progress 12 2 1 2 0 2 2 3
........ ...... ...........,. ,. ...,...... .. ,.,. ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... . ... ... ... ..._........ ............... ........ ............ . ... ...,....,., ... ._........ . .. ............... .........
31 H Develop one-stop mWti-service center Retreat,update,tliscuss w/goal 5 "One Auburn" progress 12 3 1 2 0 2 2 2
......... _. . ........... . ._...... ... ......... . .. ......... ......... ......... ......... ,.... .......... ............... . .........,,,,,,... ......... ........_.. ....... .....,..... ... ........ . ............ .........
32 BB Develop crileria for reviewing City owned properties Council Committee agentlas Sustaina6ility progress 11 2 3 1 0 2 1 2
_.......... ... .. ... ......._.... .... .............. .. ...... ._....... .................. . .. . ............ ............. __...... ........ ......_.. .... .............. ,........ ......_...._.. ._. _._ ... ..,......... ... ........... . ... .............. . . ........
33 43 CompleteSR164improvements COwagenda Livability (uWre it 1 7 3 2 1 3 0
. ....... ... . . ....._........ .... _................ .... ......... .,.,,,,... ....._. .... ..... ......... ......... .... .. ............ ,., . .......___. ............... ... ............ . „ .. ........ ,........., _. . ............... ........ .......... .............
34 44 Complete link road from SR 164 to SR 18 COw agenda Livabiliiy tuture 11 0 1 3 3 1 3 0
. ........ ... . . ............ .. . ......... .. . .......... .................. . . ........ ......... ......... ......... .. .. ._... .................. .................. .... ..... . ............. ... ............... .. . ........ .........
35 7 Develop Olson Creek complex from Olson Farm to the Golf Course Council Comminee agendas Livability future 11 2 1 2 2 2 0 2
. ..... ... . . . ....... . . ........... . ............ ............. ..._.... ......... . .._....... . ......... . ................ . ... .......... ... .. . ......... ................. ....... ........... . ......._ ......... . ..........
36 J Consider an Aubum Housfng Authoriry Retreat agenaa,upaate,discuss Livability future 11 1 1 1 3 2 3 0
..._._.... _. ....__ ......__.. _........ .. . ............... ................ ._......... ...... ... ......... ................ ............. ......... ......... . .................. .. ......... ...... .......... .. ... ............... ..... ............. ..........
37 F Market Aubum as ihe regional eNertainmenf center Council Committee agendas Livability progress 10 2 1 2 0 3 0 2
....... ... .................. . .......... .. . .... .......... ..._. . .......... . .. ........... ..._....._. ... .. ......... .. . ....,,....... ............ . ............ _....... . ..........._..,. .. .....�.,�... .. ..... ............. ........... .........
38 37 Developmen[of Golden Triangle area Council Committee agendas Sustainability fuWre 10 2 1 2 0 1 2 2
........._. ......._............__................_._.........._........_............_...................._._........................................................................................_..... .........................................................................__.............................................. ............_......_..................._...,,............. . . ...,. ...._......... ....
.......� ........... ............... ............... ...............
39 a0 Proactively work with BNSF to encourage buffer areas at rail yartl Council Committee agendas Parinerships progress 10 2 1 2 2 1 1 1
......... ... ._................. ... _....... ... .. ......... ........ .......... . ................. ............. . ......... ........ .......... ............ . ......... ................. ......._.. ..... .. .......,...... _ .. .. ............. ......... ...........
a0 N Comple�e connecfions from downtown to Ihe Interurban and White River Trails Council Committee agentlas Livabilily progress 10 3 1 2 0 2 1 1
............ ... ..........__.. ...... .......... ... ..... .......... .................. ............... ....._.. ......... ........ .......... . . ............ .._._..... .._......._ ......... ......,,...... .. ...,,_... .. ............... ...........
41 29 Redevelopment of'C St.SW and i5th SL SW properties Council Committee agendas Sustainability progress 9 2 1 2 0 2 0 2
...._.... ... ...........__.. ..... ........... ... ...... ......... ................. ........... ...._.._.. .._ .. .. .......... ...... ......... ... ......... . . ......... ...._._.... ,.....___ . , ,....... .. ... ......_..._. ............. .........
42 v Add commercial zoning to indusUial areas Council Committee agentlas Sus�ainability progress 9 2 1 1 2 2 0 1
............___...... ..........................................._.............................................._............................................._......._......_._._.....___........_..... ................................_........................__............................................................. ..............._._...... ..........._..........____.. .. ,........ ..................
.. .. ............ ............... ..............................
43 i6 Develop/improve MW[i-Care site Council Commiuee agendas Sus�ainabiliry fuWre 9 2 1 3 0 1 1 1
. ........_.. .. ......._.. ......... ......... . . ......... . . .......... .....__......... . ...................... .... ......... .. . ......... .............. ............. ...... ,,,....... .. ...... .......... ........ ............
44 4 Complete'I'Sireet corridor/rom 40th St.to 277th SL COW agentla Livabillty progress 9 2 1 2 0 1 1 2
............ ... .. .................. ...... _....... .. . ......... ............... . .. . ............. ..._....... ........_,. ...._. ........... ......... ......... .. .. ._.......... . ... ._...... ....._._. __._. ., .,.... .. . ............... ....... ........... ...............
45 5 Build out'I'Street corridor with appropriate buffers COw agenda LivabiliTy pmgress 9 2 7 2 0 1 1 2
. ....._ ... .._............. ...... .............. .. ......... .. .... .. ....... . . „ ........... . ... ........ _....._.... .......... ..... ......... ....... ...... .................. ,.,,,,........... . , ........ .. .... .,........._. ..... ......... .., ,........
46 37 Relocate M&O facility COW agenda Sustaina6ility fuWre 9 1 1 1 2 0 3 1
.........._ ............ .._.................................................................................................................................._........._......__..............................._ ......_.._.......__......................................................................_...___................... ............................................................. ............... _....._..............._... ............... ............
9 Y Progress 9 1 1 3 0 2 1 ..........1......
47 15 Restore Mill Creek Councii Committee a endas Sustainabilit
...... ... ............ . ...... ............ . . ......... .... .............. .. ... ........._. ........ . . ............ ....._... ... ......... . . ............. .. .. .......... . .. ......... . ....... .. ___. ......._. . ......... ..............
48 6 Complete Green River Trail COW agenda Livabili�y future 9 2 1 1 0 2 1 2
....... ... ...._.......... ............. ......__... ...,...,_. _......_.._.... ._........ .................. _............. . ......... .. ._.........._. .... ..... ......... .._.._._ ....... ......... .. __ ... ......__ ... . ......... .....,,.......
49 3 Complete Thomas annexation Council Committee agendas "One Aubum" future 8 1 1 2 0 2 0 2
...... ... .. .......... .. .._......_._. ,. . ...._......... ........._...... ... .. ........_ .......... ................. ......._...... ....._.... ... . ........ .. ......... .,, ............_. ....... ......... .. ._.._.. ......... . .. ............ ._........
5o p� Develop espressoQuice bar&possible bike/skate shop on Interurban Trail COW a9enaa Livability FuWre 8 1 1 1 2 1 2 0
(seasonal concessions)
........... ... ... ... ............ ......... . . ......... . ............... .. .. .......... ............ .........._...... ..........._...... .. ............ . ....... ......... .. . .._........... . .... ......... ....... ......... .. .. . ............... ..... ... ....... ._......
51 10 Increase SR 167 to four lanes each side Council Committee agendas Livability fuWre 7 1 1 2 0 1 1 1
........ .... .. . . .......... ........._... . ......... .. ............ .......... .. ... . ............. ............, � ........, .... ......... ......... ..._.....
52 26 Complete SR 167/SR 18 mterchange Council Commiuee agendas Lrvability future 7 1 7 2 0 1 1 1
....... ... .... „ ............. .... ............. .. ........... .....,........... , ........ ............,.,.,,,., ,. ......... ,.......,.... „ .........,.. . ...... ........., , .. .................,. ...,.... .......... .......... . ........ ......... ..........
53 47 Add haW roufe from'R'St.to Ellingson Council Committee agendas Livabilily fWure 7 1 1 2 2 1 0 0
........ ... .... .......... . ........... .... .............. ......... . ......... ......... . ......... .......... ....._.. ............ . . ... ......... _.................... ......... ........... ......... ..... ............. ..__...
54 49 Complete Pierce County annexations Council Committee agendas "One Aubum" progress 7 1 1 1 0 2 0 2
..._._.... ... _...._... ......... ........... . ................. ... .. . .......... .._....... .... . ......... ............... ............._.. ......... .......... .__... ...... .,..._... .. . ............... __...... ..............
55 at Muck�eshwt Indian Tribe's economic development area Council Committee agendas Partnerships progress 6 0 1 1 0 7 1 2
.......... ... . ............... .. ........... .............._ ............ .. . ........... ..........._ ... ......... .. . .._._......... ........... ............ . .................. ..........., .. ........,..,. ._ ............ ............ ..
.. ...... ....
56 11 �evelopment of Emerald Downs area Council Committee agendas Sustainability future fi 1 1 1 p 1 1 1
............ ............ ........................_........................_......_._.........__...___...........................__......................................................................... ..........................._.._.......__....................................._........................................ .....................................................
57 45 Annex'D'St.(SNck)neighborhood Council Committee agendas "One Auburn" future 6 1 � 1 �� 1 0 1 0 2
58_ ,,,,19 New Pos�Offce ........... .............. .......... . ............. ._............... .._Council Committee agentlas._...... Lrvability future.,, , 6..........._'... .'�..... ......... ......... ......... .........
1 0 2 0 1
....... ... .................. ........._.... ......... _._......_... .... .............. ............ ......... ....... ......... ................ ................ .................. ..._....__....... ... ......... .. _... .._......... . Page2�o(.3 ..........
line 2016 Goal Description COC Agenda Recommendation Sirategy Status To[al Nan��, wiy������ �y��� �on� e�n sue aicn
ref it ref# Vo�es
59 46 Build south end Irail loop and horse treil COw agenda Livability fuWre 6 2 7 0 1 1 1 0
........._ _. ____.. .................. ............. . .. . ................... . . .......... .... ............. .................. ......_......... ..... ............. ..._._ .......... _._............. _._._ _..... ......._ .. ...... . ........... .. ............ .. ..........
so pq Encourage development ot neighborhood west of C St.corridor by eztending sky Council Committee agendas Sustainability fuWre 5 0 7 1 1 1 0 1
bridge across C St.
...... ... .... ..... ......... ,............ ................ ... .... . .......... ........ . ......... . ................. . ................ . .......... ... . ........... . ......... . ......... .,.. ................... ........ _ ........ ........_ ......... .........
61 34 Rezone area sou�h of Super Mall to comme�cial Councii Comminee ageneas Susiafnability future 5 1 1 1 0 1 0 1
...._..._. ._ ..___... .................. __..... ........._...... ._.......... ........... ...... . . ......... ._......_.. ......... . __ . ......... . .... ........ .............__. .. ......... .. ......... ......... ......... .........
62 O Pursue opportunities for indoor and outdoor soccer taciliiies Council Committee agendas Livabiliry progress 5 1 1 2 0 7 0 0
. ...... ......... . ......... . .. ............... . ........._... . ................. . . .............. .. ... . . . .. ... ............ .......... ... ......... . ......... . ......... ...... ........... ... ......... .. ......... ......... .......... .........
63 35 Rebuild Cross Town Connector Bridye over Irain yard Council Committee agendas Livability fu�ure 4 2 1 0 0 0 1 0
...... ... . ......... . .. .._..... . ........... ......... ............. . .. ... .... .. ... ........ ........... . ........ ......... . ......... .... .............. .. . ....... .....___. .. ......... ... .. .. .... .. ........
64 33 Restore Whi[e Lake Council Committee agendas Sustainability fuWre 4 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
.......... .......... ......... _...._. .. .................. .... ......... ..... . ._......... ... .. ............ .. ,............... .................. ......... . ......... . . . ............. ............... .... . ..__..... _ ._. . .......... .. . . ._..... . .........
65 tA InfluenCe resloration of NW Auburn agriCWtUfal properties Cncl Com'tee agentlas w/agn-tourism SUStainability progress 3 3
............ ... . .... ......... ............. ... .. ... .......... ....... ........... ........._... ............... __...... ...____ ___...... . ..... ......... ..............._. ........_ .. ... . ......... .. . ............... .........
6s tB Continue advocacy for AMTRAK stop in Aubum COw agentla Lrvabilily progress 3 3
__....... ... . ........... .. ........... . ......_.. ........_... . ..__..._.... .............. ._............ ......... ......... .. ......... .... .._....... . .. ....... .. .......... ............. . .........
67 1C Develop working rela�ionships with univershes Council Comminee a9endas Sustainability progress 3 3
. ...... ... ........_. ............... .. . ........... ......... .. ..... ....... . ,.............. .._............... ............ . ......... . .......... ... .......... ................ . ............ .. ...._....... ............ . .
68 iD Siudy feasibihty of relocallng the airport to the Academy area Retreat.update,diswss w/goai 14 Sustainabihty fuWre 3 3
�3of3
w�-E Vision For The Future 2030 auBURN
, ��.� ��,.
.
. � -
.�, , �
�;.,v,�, �r�w<. z �
� I e:� oevaw ���
I�� l� � cp;. nao[�orvn � � �II
ZW9 VALLCYDflIVCIN �
� � PM1OPCR➢FS �/� _y
I µ 3'�\ � 5 �i ' � i 7
�I (� µ .naus I o �or o�o�- nrr�: . _ _ _ _ _,
���H� BUILDOIITI`TRCfT
M' I y�' %ATIOIY � � ` ➢.£'. ` �
.O0.RIpOP WR11 ,
+ `_ �� J 1i I A4�RORiI�TCIIIIfiT�S`.. )
4e a � � I �
I _ _ ` i� , q. I \., 6 I _ _ — — — — — — — —
�w ��nrtn�rrm � .•�� ii JJJf
�' � � CCONOmICDEVILGPMLPII LDMPLElL� � �, GREEN � � I
1 I STNpTEGYpHLn STPECI ��� Ilµpll �I � ,1 �
k �� " �� � -izrrrsnN�� r � � � � 1 � � � ♦
� sn ie� �''.` .f4 � I,
n u�H[s
� r[xsm[ � � � fl � �
�� 12 � � � � � � � � � � � e ` � � � � � �
G I.cor.w�[r[nio sr '�'�+ � � � � �. � � I �
COflRIDOfl
AHOADJACCNT ���
� � � i
/
W %VOM2fIC5 /..,
�I f � � .
1� ' e I '�
� i ,,/
, �� � .. - � 1 1 ,y" ,����
o[vaov - f �✓
� , � � li
'� i--� u¢anmoowHs � . ' l.
1$ I aqee ' '14 /�i
� .� OCVELDPMEM � ��
�
I' � I �� � .� �IPPoRIAflFA , '
II W i II , I
�w,
I � � . �; @ � � ._ � . � �
I � ' �(�4 � }y.'_ ;.ir�w�� IE L .. � S�v�sunxn:sr — _ , i;
� � ° 7�-� � �
M W I ; . � . . �6 -��.. � ,.
I a � Q 1�� n - .i p.
i s3e¢im51=� Q a H{.• `,, o[vno i v�mv[ ��� . . . � .
�\� P� ..1� � ,�� II IAIILTI UIV[SIiC , .
� VA S 3 �� � �I -r� � �� � > /i
I �'/ 0&ROG � ' . � . �p Y` L. I
'W\ftSY Al1tllIP�1 ZO �� I �i/+'. A.:
r' QIVIflONMLNTAL
�K 19 PCviTAl�2EnNDREDEVROP P ' �'
� �ueunn�.-r��rtzwm�tn'ermm � �
,wca P e
� 23 � L � /,.
y .j 21 1 22 1i ���
M� 0[VROP I __ � �
GREENtONC u If Mml�l� y ��Tqf� \\ `
PNEA I IIIAL.ONL p �
�'� �r " - 24 28 E - uNocAvass y ' _ -
�-5 i- � � I
'PO� 27 I uu. . ., . . ' <«� -_
� ��ii¢ssouuicn�n - e.ec. � F � � � � '
� �� , �, <i �ireaunenr+ �� � 30 � g :.� I
_- _--^`— .ani� .�._a�ii�s�i�t C�
�, ._ .__ , �.�
��
� 'A�� 26� 1. � 1� IXVFNO ' .
� � . ���'.�. ....�— . lL5 GOVE R�6g�ti ..
COMPLCff .'... . NIfICVCLOP . �4 C�MMIINITY S'�' � �•
I vafi� aix c �i i.r�si y. - cr�vus 0 33 oxoss� ►
� wrza�neier o 'Hn¢ LL i � la.��� � � q �P�♦
i' �
N[SipP[ \ `
� � isM��n 31 . 36 _ ° � �urr � c.rw
� � ECOWMK�EVf10VMCNi .:WUNNWAY ^ 32 ���
� ��� �cLCC.C ,� :. � ,
I II TT1UlEGYAP[4 �p SpUiH NCw � i._
I ��// ItCOEVROPMBYi s_ COMlNNIiY GOLOENTqIANGI.E , � �
34 � p�pN ECONOMIC�EVEL�PQlT �
� 1� .. ;.r.. y�i m w. � <LN1�:N iTNnTEGYnRFn � I �
PElD I rt, , cOMGLCfC
� 1 w i . ' 35 I 37 ' uHximao I �
� .e�x.'- i��srowrv omaor
' � `GO��lN1HVWGlC
� �L �� 'nAcc�e� � 1 r 1 � 41 � �
ASTSE WPftIWN y� �
\ r 1� I '� ECO S1lIRR�Y PFA M � � • ` ,�ue M ' NtONGMIC�OLVLLOPML IPIBPCA ,
� , � °R W��i.. I � ♦
i
� / r �'� � � ' _ _ � �
.,, i � 40 _ ' . pa� . 1
onsr unianeo
a�` ♦
/ �'
ourrtA�ncn � . �_ _ _ _ _
�� I � �y I � � -� �
/ I I g 4fi 1 � '�:
' ALG�NA
� � g 45 -.zvmwmse�-� . � � ` '
Noasc � �3 , ' I
� nucn ��i
� � � ' ' _ n��No_riorv � mma�rrE ,
1 ` SftIH�
� ` ImRtOVEA1ENT5 �
I� � � �
I 47 ` �
" 1 � noo 1
� i�inu�aavn n�� _ 1 �
�'� � � ' ��� cnr[wnv �
/� 1 �I 1
/ �tturvcsan.a -w` .J� , �
� � ♦ t / _ cnr[wm
d � � \
� ,
, . � �
}� r-;�,: :=�c - , � �, � �
— � � — s, �
� � � i ' . �i,o I � ,
, � � r . . �e � � �
II , � � � " ' �, � '
I�...ExistingTrails � �� ��. - � � `� `♦
• �:, �
- - Proposed Trails I � �" 1 1 � � � � ! �
� . � ' �
I l .
I Streams �� 1� � _ _ _ _ .� .u� _ _ _ _ _ �_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , - � I
I �' �a �rfr=_ _
1 O
1^ I� �I �
Lakes and Rivers � �� � � � �
� ; �
I� i Parks&Golf Courses � � � � - - - - - -� - - - - - � �
I&
y . a d ♦
� GreenZone 8 � � _ � . �� ti o �
Economic Development StrategyAroas B � cnrrwnr• - . s� '�°"-��-�
//� � +" 1
MIT Economlc DevelopmentArea � ����t //� � 1
� - __ �.�a f,ew<. i� ' '
+ Areas to De DevelopedlRadevelopetl � ` 1 �/ �{w!
�, m l
i Areas to be Rezonetl ` �_ - _ +.n»�ddaP"�" ��I ��II�
� � � .� r �r_ �
OthBf � - _ �,,_ _ _�
� Pierce County UGA
�_ � Ciry Limits 49
� PolentialAnnexationAreas mMrarc .
PIOIRC.pONiV
� 4NNEI.ATIONS
Urban Center with Extended Area i
o �,aoo t,000 �,aoo a,000 s.oao
FEET
Map I�:354] I I
Revlsetl On:OJ90/10
Inloimnuun.now•�is tor prne�al rmu�c-�c w�>cza
onlyanOJtr�� vi�ly i i
y�ldptllc �nagiapMCNle •�VVeJC1T1�e I
CiIY ol LiYi�nr�nuMef ra WarrantY.��t���if aanary, I
— — - �
*�*
�' 7HM'Yo '
�,p0.E V�'MAGINEO
City of Auburn
Vision & nAission Statements
Vision:.
As a city of regional significance, proud of its small town heritage
as well as the diversity of its people and neighborhoods,
Auburn offers an opportunity I � a ages to en�oy .
`t� �-�-�� `�-c1 0 � � 1� �✓
� ✓ 1/�� � q �
��, P�� r��� a-V. � a�'E�.. .
The key words for me are "enjoy l�fe" which means much m`dre than
just the opportunity for entertainment. "Enjoy life"means having
good jobs, housing, education, arts, religion, and personal safety,
as well as historic experiences, i.nteraction with nature, local
healthcare, and getting around town, to name jusf a few things that
"enjoy life"implies. -- Rich Wagner.
Mission:
To provide a service-oriented government that meets the needs of our
citizens and business community through efficient and professional
management with responsive and accessible leadership.
� Strategies
Supporting the City of Auburn
Vision & Mission *
yO"
��7HANYOU1,ty�CINEn
!�`
"One_Auburn'_'
A strong sense of community, allowing all people to appreciate
each other through celebration and working together to solve
problems cooperatively.
- Sustainabilifv
Economic viability, coupled with environmental stewardship,
while planning and acting for our future.
uali
Striving for the best in people, projects and services.
Partnerships
Continually seeking and maintaining productive relationships with
our internal and external partners.
Livabilitv
ProVid.i.ng a safe and desirable
commun.ity.
S#rategies Suppo�ting the City of Auburn Vision & Mission
The City of Aubum Vision ancJ Mission statements were adopte.d by the Council in 1997. These
supporting Strategies have been suggested by the Council Operations Committee, Rich VUagner,
Sue Singer and Nancy Backus, in cooperation wiEh 2010 Vision Retreat Fac'ilitator, Greg Prothman,
to help focus Councilmembers' thinking about their vision for the City's future. These Strategies will be
discussed and amended as necessary at the Council Visioning Retreat on October 28th
VISIOII:
As a city of regional significance, proud of its small town heritage
as well as the diversity of its people and neighborhoods,
Auburn offers an opportunity for people of all ages to enjoy life.
Mission:
To provide a service-0riented government that meets the needs
of ourcitizens and business community through efficient
and professional management with responsive and accessible leadership.
Strateqies:
"One Auburn"
A strong se.nse of community, allowing all people to appreciate each other through
celebration and working together to solve problems cooperatively.
Sustainabilitv
Economic viability, coupled with environmental stewardship, while planning and acting
for our future.
uali
Striving for the best in people, projects and services.
Pactnershias external partners.
Continually seeking and maintaining productive relationships with our internal and
Livabili
Providing a safe and desirable community.
Tab OS-fivestrategies.doc 10/19/10 6:50 pm rew
Page 1 of 1
*
CRYOF �_ �
+ WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VI§ION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28 -29, 201 O
Police Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Ensure that Aubum is a safe andsecure p/ace to live or have a business:
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support; � Yes ❑ No
Workload report with graphs attached - Brief highlights below
CAU Galls - On average in 2009, each Aubum ci4izen made 1_13 calls for police services.
Response Times - PRI 1 response times have remained under 4 minutes since 2005. Our
2009 PRI 2, 3 & 4 calis experienced an increase for the first time since 2005. From 2008 to
2009 we experienced a 5.6% inc�ease in PRI 2 responses, a 7.5% increase in PRI 3 and a
5.9% increase in PRI 4. PRI 1 = Highest wifh confirmeii hazard which could result in
extensive loss of life/or prop. PRI 2 = Minimal hazard with considerably less potential for loss
ofiife or prop. PRI 3 = Low hazard, non-life thre.atening. PRI 4 = Police reports/c.old calls.
Violent Crimes: Since 2005, the total number of reported Part 1 & 2 Violent Crimes; which
include murcJer, �ape, robbery, and aggravated assault saw a 2.6% increase. Between 2006
anii 2009 we experienced a 10.2% decrease in violent crime.
Prope.rty Crimes: Since 2005, Part 1 Property Crimes which include arson, burgla_ry,
larceny and motor vehicle theft has seen a decrease of 17.2%. The decrease from 2008 to
2009 was 8:1%.
Auburn Grime Rate: Our Part 1 & 2 Crime Rates per 1000 population for the City of Auburn
from 1998 — 2009 decreased from 105;9 to 53.5 Crimes per 1000 Citizens, a 49.5%
decrease. The decrease from 2008 to 2009 was 8.4%.
Crime per Population Gomparison: Auburn's ranking for Part 1 & 2 Crimes in the 16 Cifies
and Counties with Populations of 50,000— 100,000 was 6�h in 2009.
Crime per State Ranking: The City of Auburn's ranking of Part 1 & Part 2 crimes with all
248 Cities and Counfies based on Crimes per 1000 Citizens was 43'' in 2009. In 1999, the
City of Auburn crime ranking was 11tn
Supporting Documents Attached: � Yes ❑ No
0 2009 Auburn Police Department Workload Analysis
Work Completed to Date:
o Provided professional Police Services to Six Reporting Districts. All six Districts are
staffed 24/7, o�cers have the responsibility of having a project in their District that
targets specific issues. Community Response Team officers continued to develop
information and assist all city departmenfs and provide Block watch programs in ou�
neighbdrhoods
. Prepared timely crime analysis data that assiSted officer's in the field'in the prevention
of crime and fhe detection, and apprehension of persons responsible for crime.
Weekly reports go outon cnmes sfats and detectives roufe information/probable cause
bulletins to the patrol division
• Gonfinued to expand the use of Photo Safe Red Light Enforcement and Speed
EnforcemenYwithin the Cityof Aubum in order to enhance the publicsafety of our
pedestrian and vehicular traffic. In 2009, two school zones were added and surveys
thcoughout the city were completed to identify future intersections tHat would be
app�op�iate for photo enforcement
e Continued to expand and direct CRT officer's toward the P�oblem Oriented Policing
(POP) philosophy. CRT offcers continued to provide directed policing, target gangs,
handle the Rental Housing Program and Blo.ck watch presentations
• Spent 230 hours in 2009 and 288 in 2010 verifying fhe address and residency of
registered sex offenders (RSO) funded by a grant through King County Sheriff's Office
• Provided professional Police Services for the Special Emphas'is Gang Ini4iafive
Program funded through a Justice Assistance grant
• Participated in several co.ordinated nighttime seat belt patrols funded by a granY
received through The Washington Traffic Safery Commission
• Parficipated in "Drive Wammered Get Nailed° Multi-jurisdictional DUI Patrols funded by
a grant received through The Washington Traffic Safety Gommission
• Provided professional Police Services for the Auto Theft Prevention Grant Program
funded through Washington Association of 8heriffs and Police Chiefs
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
• Continue to implement technology that increases efficiencies in the feld and assist in
solving crime. Those technologies include 4he new CAD (Computer Automated
Dispatching), AVL (Automated Vehicle Location) and enhance Gity wide video
mon itori ng/su rveil lance.
• Continue to look for funding opportunities for an indoor Police Firing Range
Key T'imeline/DateslMilestones:
Review progress on an annual basis.
Key IssueslConcerns/lmpediments:
. Regional Crime trends are on the increase for the first half of 2010.
. Availability of continued funding sou�ces
• Staffing challenges due to anticipated retirements and a change in the overall
experience level of our staff.
Auburn Police Department
�, , , ,, .�� .,
� �
�%' � AUB R POLICE � '�� `
� �'� ' DEPARTMEN'r_ = 4�j
�� ��+� Accredited swi
���e Professional ,,%�
,�.. �?edicated.:�
2009
Workload Analysis
�
October 28, 2010
AUBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT
2009 Worl:load Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The Aubum Police Department Workload Analysis has been
in existence since 1996 and is utilized by ad�ninistrative staff
to analyze trends and provide guidance for planning police
Services into the future. We continued to analyze a variety of
information that we believe provides us with a solid
understanding of our current and future workload.
With the annexations in 2008, historical information from
prior years was used to assist in predicting the future workload
and growth trends. This type of information is vital in
providing professional policing to our community that allows
our citizens to be safe and enjoy a quality of life.
The statistical data provided in this report demonstrates the
hard work and commitment by members of the Auburn Police
Department. At no time in the history of the agency have we
experienced such a dramatic reduction in crime. This
accomplishment reinfarces our achievement of being a
nationally accmdited agency which is identified as a
professional law enforcement agency that is trusted, respected,
and supported by the citizens of Auburn
The report also contains workload comparisons of neighboring
jurisdictions in South King County. This analysis provides us
witl� similar statistics as Part 1 and Part 2 crimes in South
King County cities rank higher than all other j�irisdictions in
the county.
CAD Calls - Chart I is the number of Compuler Aulomated Dispa�ch incidents over the last 5 years. �fhe significant
inerease from Janunry I. '_007 to 2008 was due to the increased calls for service in the newly annexed areas of Lza Hill and
West Hill. Since 200R, we have esperienced a 19.6"/� inerease in our cal] load. On average in 2009, each Auburn citizen
m�de 1.13 calls for police serviccs.
77,000
72,000
67,000 63�y 63,160
60,278
62,000 ❑CAD Calls
57,000
52.000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Snwrr:
V'ulle�'Com R�'pm't
Population -Chart 2 depicts lhe population growih frmn 200� to 2009. During this period the Ciry's po}�ulation incre�szd
42.2°/u. The incre�se uf 33J`%h from 2007 to 2009 wu.duc to ihe Lea Hill and West I�lill annex�tion.
72,000 67,005 67,4$S—
62000
48,995 50,470
52 000
42 000
❑Populatfon
32,000
22.000
12,000 - - - -
2005 2006 2007 2005 2009
Sourcc:
Slnle uJ!4�}�.vhi�vgtrm, 011icr u/Fivauciul,L9pnuge�uen�
CAD Call and Incident Reports - Chart 3 -Since 2005, CAD culls have incraaseci I R.7"�� while police Incidenl Reports
increased I�J%. locidcni rcporls ;ur ;ictuel wrillen policc reporis mmpleted by officcrs in Ihe filed.
80,OOD 75,026 7
70,000 63 639 63,160
60 276
60,000
50.000
40.000 ❑CAD Cal Is
30,000
16.057 16,823 17.005 �6.713 ■Incident
20,000 Reports
10,000
0 �
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
So
urre: 6'al(er Co�n&Spi!lmun RecurJx A4ana�emenl Sr.clenv
Response Times - Chart 4 shows Prioriry 1 response Gmes have remained under 4 minutes since 2005. Our 2009 Prioriry
2. 3 &4 calls experienced an inerease for the firsl time since 2005. From 200A to 2009 we experienced a 5.6% increase in
PRI 2 responses, a 7.5"io increase in PRI 3 responses and x 5.9°/, increase in PRI 4 responses. Defi�itions: PRI I =
Highest priority, contirmed harard which could resuL in exlensive loss oF Iife/or property. PRI 2 = Minimxl hazard wi[h
considerably less potential For loss of life andior property. PRI 3 = Low hazard, non-life [hreatening. PRI 4 = Police
reports or cold calls.
50
�� 407
40 � I , 33 30.9 32.7
� � i ❑PRI1
30 ,
■PRI 2
22.4 21.7 i
❑PRI 3
20 15 �� ❑PRI4
13.5
10.7 y 9.5
10
. 3.5 3.1 3 26 3•2
0
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Source:
6"allc i�Cnm Repor�
Commissioned Staf'f-Chxrt 5 illustrates that since 2005, Ihe number of commissioned officers tbr the City of Auburn has
grown 17.2'%,and 15,y"/o tiom 2007 l0 2009. Due to both regional and national economic conditions our stafting decrease
2.9'% tiom 2008 to 2009.
t�a -- - � 105 102
too 88
BO
s� ❑Police
ao O�cers
20
0 ::y,
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
CAU
Inciden[s by Dis[ricl — Chart 6 demonstra[es the number uf incidents per dis�rict per month. The highes� number oY
incidents was in Disu'ict ? Onc officer is assigned io each district 24 X 7.
zo,0oo ' 18 625
�a,000
i6,0oo 13,317
i4,00o 11,126 10528
i2,o00 � 9,018
10,000 - 7 817 -� ❑CAD Calls
8,000 per District
6.000
4.000
2.000
� _ _ —
District 1 District 2 District 3 D�strict 4 District 5 Disiricl 6
Violent Crimes. Chart 7 depicts the tolal number of Auburn reported Pari 1 & 2 Violent Crimes. This tota] includes
murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault. Sinee 2005 we have experienced a 2.6% increase in violen� crime. Between
2006 and 2009 we e�perienced a 10.'_'"�L deacasc in violent crime.
,I.__ . . . . . __. _ ____ ____. _ . . . ----
3so ���� 2sa 305 2�5 274
300 ' 248
zso
zoo
�y0 � .� ❑Violent
Crimes
�o0
so , I
o :zt::_;' _ - �:
2005 2006 2007 2008 20G9
Saurce: G4A As:rocia�ion n�Sherij')s und Polire Chiels d UCR Repw��
Violent Crimes by Category: Chart 8 breaks down Violent Gimes to individual cateaories to include murder, rape,
robbery and aggravated assuult.
180 � - _ . .1.�5—.
�so ❑Murder
140 12
�zo 92 �� , ■Rape
�o0 8
80 ❑Robbery
60 i
40 ❑Aggravated
14 14 � Assault
20 � Q 1 p I
p > -
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
So+n'ce: WA As.rociaJion oJSher'i/jc onal Polire Chizjs& UCR Repor�
ProperTy Crimes: Chart 9 - Auburn Part 1 Property Crimes includes arson, burglary, larceny and motor vehicle thefr.
Since 2005, we have seen a deerease in reported felonv propertv crime by 17?"/,. The decrease hom 2008 to 2009 was
R.I%,.
a.5oo 4 035 3 581 3,636
a.000 3,255 3,339
3500 -- � �.H �
3.000
2,500
2.000 ❑Property
11500 Crime
1.000
S00
;;. .
p -r:�.�..:
2W5 2006 2007 2008 2D09
� Source: YPA 9ssocia�ion o1�S'heriJ'/.i�und Polire ChiuJ�i d UC2 Repun
Property Crimes by Category: Chart 10 breaks down Property Crimes into individual categories to include arson,
burglary, larceny and motor vehicle thzfis. Since 2005, we have seen a reduction i�reported Arson cases by 47%.
Burglary has been reduced by 53%. Larceny decreased by 5.9'%and reported Motor Vehicle Theft fel]by �7%. 1'lie
overall reduction in property crime takes into account the 200H statistical data obtained after the Lea Hill and West Hill
annexations.
3.00o i Z509
, 2343 2362
2,soo 221 g ❑Arson
1962
2.000 ' ■Burglary
t �I I
t500 �
,i869 I ❑Larceny
L000 623 686 590 6�6 630 4� 590 3691, ❑Vehicle
soo 34 3 30 pg � Theft
o ." -
zoos zoos zoo� Zooa zoos
Soan�ce: WA Associuiion q%SheriJ�s ancl Pnlire Chiefs& UCR Repor7
Fraud/Forgery Crimes. Chart 10 provides us with a look of all Fraud and Furgery cases repoRed to lhe Aubum Police
Department from 2006 through 2009. Since 2006 we have realized a 3.R°:� increase in Ihese crimes.
� -- - . __-- ---- - - --
aoo � . . __ .352
350 L 288
300 2�
250
❑Fraud &
2�� Forgery
uo
�oo
50
::� � . .R3o- .•'�,.
�
2006 2007 2008 2009
Source: Spillmmr Records Manugemen�Sra'�rrn
Proper[y Crimes: Chart 11 illustrates a newly tracked field of all Properiy Gimes related to Fraud and Forgery
Complaints ,ince?006.
zoo
i ❑Forgery
18D
i so ❑Credit Card
iao ' ATM Fraud
120 ❑Fraud
��� Impersonation
�0 53 57
6C1 0 Fraud Swindle
ao 2�
Zo 2 p ■Fraud Welfare
o '
2UOti 2007 2008 2009
Source: Spillm<n�Ri rords Managemenl Suelern
� All Felony Crimes Charl 12 i1lusVates all felony crimes assigned�o our Investigations Division. This includes our Major
Crimes Unit, Property Crimes Unit u�d our Special Investigahons Unit, (S.I.U.). The large increase in 2009 depicts the true
mm�ber of cases assigned and reviewed by our detectives. In prior years iheses cases wiih no suspecl infonnation were not
assigned and tracked. This oew tracking procedure will cnsurc ull felom cases nre accounted for and recorded.
3.500 �� �
3.000 i
2,500 i
2.000 � �,� 1,485 .
�,500 � t 166 ❑All Felo�y
t.000 Crimes
500 �
0 r-.
2005 200G 2007 2008 2009
So+u ce:
SpilGna��Recards Manaoerwen�Sl�.ctem
Major Crimes: Chart 13 illustrates those felony crimes assigned to our Major Crimes Unit. These crimes include murder,
rape, robbery, kidnapping, aggravated assault, domes-tic violence, child abuse, all other sex offenses, felony harassment,
felony stalking and other misceLlaneous felonies. Since 2005 we have seen an ]8J°/u reduction in the uumber of m�jor
crime Felooy cases assiened to major c�imes deteclives,
__ . . 857 - -� g � -
70U .-y
53i
60U q 489
WO � �
� 400
300 ❑Major
20o Case's
�oo
o ,�z� :; ,:r
zoos zoos zoo� zooa zoas
Source: SNiIlmcuv Reeoi�d,s dJm�ogenven7 Sc.rlem
Property & S.I.U. Crimes: Chart 14 illustrates felony crimes assigned to our PropeiTy Crimes Unit and S.I.U. 7'hese
crimes include arsoa residential bw�glary, commercial burglary, larceny, inotor vehicle thetts, felony malicious mischief,
fraud/forgeiy, and possession of stolen property, violalion of'the uniform controlled substance act, prescription forgery and
other miscella�eous felonies. ln 2009, 2,383 property crin�es cases were assigned to the property crimes unit and 232
cases to S.I.U. 7'he large increase in 2009 depicts Ihe Irue number of cases assigned and reviewed by our deteclives. In
prior years �l�eses eases wi�h no suspect information were not assigned, reviewed or tracked. This new [raeking procedure
will ensure all felony eases assigned und reviewed by our detectives are xccounted for and recorded.
3.000 2,6'IS �
2,500
2,000
Lsoo ❑Property&
1,000 S.I.U.
Case's
500
� O •�¢
20G5 2006 2007 20U8 2009
Snmre: Spillma��2ecor'rls Managemew S'vs�ena
Evidence: Chart I� shows the workload of our two evidence techniciaus. ln 2007, our two evidence tectmicians received
into cus[ody, released from custody and/or disposed of 11,743 evidence/property items. In 2009 that number increased
9.1% to 12,806 items handled in one form or another. That equates to handlin�; approxima[ely 49.3 evidence/property
items per scheduled work day.
, . . . ... -- -_._----------------�
6.000 " 5,031 4,94z 4,965
S.000 I 3,948 ❑Received
4,000 ; 3���y,963 ■Released
3.000 , 1,502 ❑Moved
2,000 �i � 47 �,35 ❑Disposed
1,000 I
0
2007 2008 2009
Soza-ce: Spillman Rerord,s� Monaqerne�v Srs�eu�
Domestic Violence: Chart IS shows DV Offenses reported by AuUur� PD to the WASPC via Uniform Crime Repor[ing.
These crimes reporied include murdec rape, robbery, aggravated assault, simple assault, burglary, Iarceny, motor vehicle
thefC arwn and violation of a pmtection order. Since 200�, UCR reports of DV have risen by 22%. Tl�is increase can be
attributed lo [he DV assistance program, victims no longer feeling there is no hope and support in reporting DV incidents,
efficienl inves[i�ation of reporied incidence of DV, mandatory arrest of DV perpelrators,aggressive prosecution by the City
of Auburn prosecutor's oftice 1nd a detec�ive dedicated to ime�5ti�ating and fullowing up on unly DV eases.
soo 637
661 709 758
�o0 621
soo
soo
400 �Domestic
300 Vi010nC0
200
100
, , . . _ � .
0 :l �r._a. :.;_..� , ,.:
2005 2006 2007 20D8 2U09
SoAnre: 6�'A A.vsnciu�ian n/�.S'heriJJ.s�nd Pulfce Chiejt d UCR Reprn�t
All Domestic Violence Related Incidents: Chart 16 - In addition [o the UCR reported DV crimes we also track incidents
[hat involve other types of dumestic situations between two or more parlies. These incidents include verba] domestics.
trespassing, warrruit arrests, suspicious cimumst�nces and vandalism. Since 200�, we have seen an overall inerease in DV
related calls increase 29°/o. 'I�here was a reduction in all reported DV relxted incidents of 18.1%from 2005 to 2009.
2500 � 2,042 . . . 2,204 .. . . . .
1,965 1,806
Z.000
�,aoo
i.5oo
❑Total DV
L000 Crime in
Auburn
500
0 -
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Sourre: Spillman Recards Munugemenl 51's7em
Arrest Chsrt 17 illustrates the number of total xrrests made by members of the Auburn Police Department from 2006
through ?009. lt also shows the number uf individuals that were arrested and booked into Ihe Aubum JaiL Since 2006, we
have realized a 1?3% increase in the number oY individuals arrested, w�hile in the sxme time frame we have seen a 2.4'%
reduction in Ihe number of people bouked into thejail facility.
--- ----- -__ ..__ __. . . _ .
._ _ _— - --__ ._-
8.000 ' 6,326 6,933 6,678 7104
6A00 ,�: 4,281 . 4.127 4,117 4,176
4.000 ' ❑Arrested
2000 ■Booked
0
z��r, zua; zooa zoos
Snurt'r: Spillrnun Rrrnrdc hd.ma,irnreiv Sl'vvc�rn
PART 1 & PART 2 CRIMES REPORT
The source of lhe followii�g data ha5 been extracted from the Gime in Washington State Annu�l ReporL This repori is
compiled from data submitted to the Washington Uniform Gimz Repurting division of the Washington Associution of'
SheritPs and Police Chiefs by all of law enforcemeni agencies. This repurl captures slandardized data from city and cuunty
agencies for Part I & Pan 2 crimes. The number of crimes repurted is compared to the popula[ion in each reporling
cify/county. .4, an example, in ?009 the Cily uP Aubum had 53.5 Part I & 2 crimes reporied for every 1000 Aubum
citizens.
Top Ci[ies for Par[ 1 & Part 2 Crimes in King Coun[y: Chart IS follows the crime rale per ]000 citizen, to the highest
cities in King County from 2005 �hruugh 20U9. South King County cities continue to have higher Part I & Part ? crime
rstes lhan olher mimicipalities in King County.
I II � II I : II '
Tukwi1�2263 Tukwilx IR9.6 Tukwila 170J Tukwila 166.7 Tukwila IR9.5
Renton 97J Sea-Tac 86.4 Sea-Tac 74.8 Sea=Iac 65.1 Seattle 65.0
Sea-Tac 933 Renton 80.3 Renton 7L6 SeatUe 613 Sea-Tac 623
Aubum 76.2 Kenl R0.0 Aubum 69.4 Remun esL Renton Sj.S
Aubum 79A Keni 59.9 Federal w'ao 5j.>
Auburn 58.4 Burien �_.8
Auburn 53.5
Sum're_ l)rr'ived('nm ihr N':�?SP('_'005, 'llqh, _'D0. _'OO,Y und prelnnfnm'v_'009 Eivcl u/Yem'Crinrc,5'lnlivticv Rrporl.
Top Cities in South King County: Charl 19 illustrales our standing uf Part I & Parl 2 crimes per 1000 citizens fo ol.her
cilies in Soulh Kina Cuunty.
1 ' i � � � � I I I
#1 Tuk.cila PD 1 R9.5
??2 Scattle PD 65.0
#3 Se�-Txc PD 6?3
;-1 Renton PD �>.5
�> Fedzral N'av PD ��.5
�6 Burien PD 53.8
#7 Aubum PD 53.5
S'nurcr D�•rirr<7/rum�be Jb'.-0.SP(�]00�1'Preliminarr_'U0J En✓oJ Y'ear Crimr S�<nisiiee R��puri_
Auburn Crime Rate: Chart 20 - illustrates uur Pan I & 2 Gime Rates per 1000 population tbr the Ci[y uf Aubum from
1998 - 2009. Felony Part ] & Peirt 2 Violent and Property Cnmes per 1000 citizens have decreased from 105.9 incidents
per 1000 in 199ft to 53.5 incidents per 1000 in 2009. This is a 49.5"/„ �ecrease in felony cnme per 1000 citizens over Ihe
]ast 12 years.
120 i ——
y 100.4 92.6
100 91.4 88.9
87.1 832
76.2
80
58.4 53.5
60
❑Crimes per
40 1000 Citizens
20
0
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
King County Crime Rate: Chart 21 - shows lhe Average Part I & ' Crime Rales per 1000 populatiun fi>r all 37 cities in
King County from 1998 to 2009. T'his represents a decrease in lhe uveruge crime rate for all Kiug County ci[ies of 35%
over the pas� 13 years.
70 €;.2
62.5 59 57.8 57.7 59.5 59.3 60.6 63.5
GO
48.2
50 43.8 4 .8
4C
3p O Crimes pe�
1000 Citizens in
20 King County
1n
p -
1998 '-999 2000 2001 2002 20C3 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Crime per Population Comparison: Chart 22 - notzs in blue Auburn's ranking for Part I & 2 Crimes in the 31 Cities
:u�d Cou�ties with Popula[ions of?i,000 - �OA00. Noted in ereen is Aubum'.new ranking for Part I & 2 Crimes in the 16
Cities and Cuunties with Populations uf�0.000— 100.000
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
�,� ��.� Z�„� 4„ ���� 4„ 3�. ��„ 5Lh 6„ 6�, 6��
Crime per State Ranking: Chart 23 - compares Aubum ranking of Part I & Part 2 crimes with all 24R Cities and
Counties hased un Crimes per 1000 Cititen..
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
14" I1' 16" 12" 14" 26" 30" I-l" 26" 33' 40' 43
CIIYOF �* r
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29,201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Stability in Neighborhoods 8� Downtown
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direc4ion
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supp"orting Documenfs Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
The City fias actively managed �elationships with service providers, property owners
and other related parties in advocating for a cohesive and safe living condition for
residents, while maintaining a suitable for all geographical environments, i.e, schools,
parks, etc.
The recent passage of Ordinance No. 6328 provides the City with a civil penalty option
if needed to address abandoned and foreclosed propsrties where the prop.ertyowner is
not responding to Gity attempts to obtain voluntary code compliance.
Code Gompliance actively works with other departments, residents and tiusinesses
through a progressive approach to insure compliance to adopted City regulations and
standards.
Pqlice services have been restructuced to serve the distinct neighborhoods while
working to be visible and actively seen as an accessible resource. When appropriate,
the community-at-large has been contacfed rega[ding potential concerns. Police
presence has enhanced the se.curity of citizens.
Continued regulations regarding the development of single- and multi-family residences
haVe been passed to secure the long-term goal of stability.
The Save Our Stree.ts (SOS) program continues to be a popular instrument for
improving local streets while our neighborhood traffic calming and sidewalk programs
focus on safety, reduction of cut through traffic anci accessibility of residents. The
intentional targeting of neighborhoods with the most need of infrastructure rehabilitation
is an on-going focus.
The emphasis of Mayor and staff in conducting neighborhood meetings which involve all
issues related to the specifc needs have serVed to give a forum for residents to voice
needs and concerns while giving 4he City fhe opportunity to respond.
Social service agencies, and the clients they serve, have been contacted in cases of
concern o� identified risks. The neiwork of support that is present through these
proViders has been valuable to the City in working with its most vulneratile populations
and the contrac4ed agenciesthrough Human Services funding, in particular, are reliable
partners.
Wo�k Remaining to Be Completed:
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
Key IssueslConc.erns/Impediments:
Notes:
*
cmroF -*1T� .
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29, 201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Enhance Human Services
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress. � Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporting Doc.uments Attached: ❑ Ye.s � No
Work Completed to Dafe:
The City Council worked to determine main areas offunding related to the most
prevalent need in the sommunity.
Staff has worked to create new funding process in concert with the surrounding
communities. Further enhanced the process to streamline the burden on agencies wi4h
multiple applications to various citie.s by creating an online system.
1Ne moved the Human Services effort to be directly linked with the City's Administration
department to further coordinafe the services available to the community and to better
promote the resources available in a number of areas of potential need.
Work continues to happen related to the One-Stop concept. For the majority, the
agencies and their directors work together relationally for the bettermerit of Auburn.
The agencies and city participate in what is best descr'ibed as a "virtual campus",
knowing the available resources and retying on one anotherto supply themwifh the
need that has presented itself in their clienYs lives. This relational approach has been
st�engthened tiy the creation of a director's breakfast where area agencies meet
informally to maintain communicaEion with one another.
Staff worked to identify areas of potential need and encouraged agencies to respond
that would programmatically approach the lack. Over the last few biennial funding
cycles, Auburn has had successful additions to its supported Human Services agencies.
The City has agg�essively sought:agencies fhat particularly outreach and provide
services to ethnic populations that have been idenfified as underserved. The addition of
these agencies has certainly enhanced the opportunity for all residents to access
assistance in times of need.
Administration has intentionally reached out to fhe faith community as well as the
service clubs to augment the human service need in Aubum. This outreach has
proyided a more concise and ciear path for interested groups to partner in seroice as
well as providing an accountability by better pooling re§ources and sharing information.
The projects thathave been tackled by these groups include: graffiti remoyal, agency
facility rehabifitation, toy drives, clothing drives, food drives; fundraising, etc.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Human Services One-Stop Center
Key TimelinelDates/Milestones:
Key Issues/Concerns/lmpediments:
Financial uncertainty and abi�ity to leverage support in all of the needed areas
Notes:
CffYOF �_* r
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 2$-29,201 O
Planning & Development Department
Briefing Updafe for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: One-Stop Center
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
�sual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporfing Documents Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
The project parficipants ancl staff worked to form a board of interested community
members and agency staff.
The board commissioned a preliminary feasibility study which involved Auburn residenfs
at-large in the planning and investigation surrounding the need and potential users of
the facility. The study also included a definition of fhe scope of service to be provided
and builds the case for the concept as a heightened efficiency in continually economic
diffculty. The study was conducted by the Collins Group in Seattle who works with nqn-
profits in areas relative to expansion and renewal.
Collins Group was subsequently tasked with creating a business plan for the model.
The plan is nearing completion but outlines the funding structure and proposed budgets
related tg both the capital portion and the operations portion.
The concept is a key piece to Aubum's overall Human Services success in serving
residents in need. It provides a centralized location for referral and collaborative
services that are easily accessed and cohesive in presentation. The present
environment is difficult to access given the dispa�iry of population in need and locations
of agencies providing assistance.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Capital campaign
Construction
Key Timeline/DateslMilestones:
Key Issues/Concemslimpediments:
Financial uncertainty and ability to leverage support in all of the needed areas
Notes:
CCCY OF �`* s
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION2030 RETREAT—OCTOBER 28-29, 2010
Planning & Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Auburn Housing Authority
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporting Documents Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
An inyestigation was made into the feasibility of an Auburn Housing Authority. The idea
was deemed to be unfeasible given the exclusive arrangement between HUD and the
King County Housing Authority. While funds that are presently available to Aukiurn
would continue to be available, the possibility of expansion into a number of housing
issues and managemenYwas not helped by fhe housing authority concept.
South End Area Regional Coalition for Housing (SEARGH) was formed as an
alte�native funding option. SEARCH is a coalition of cities, through an interlocal
agreement, who face similar issues in providing afFordable housing that meets bo4h the
needs of residents and the provides a me.chanism for partnering with projects that are of
interest to both the municipality and the developer.
SEARCH will be operational when the enrollment period is finished. Presently;four
cities have joined (Auburn, Enumclaw, Algona and Pacific). PresentaTions have been
made to the councils of Covington, Maple Valley and Black Diam.o.nd. Beginning
conversation has begun with the cities of Sumner; Buckley and Bonney Lake.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Form official organization
Define scope
Seek funding
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones;
Key Issues/Concerns/Impedimenfs:
Financial uncertainty and ability to leverage support in all of the needed areas
Notes:
C[IYOF *��* w
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 2S-YJ, ZO'I O
Planning 8 Development Deparfinent
__ _____ _Briefing Update for 2016_Vision Goals .
Vision 2016 Goalc Urban Center Extended Areas
__
Stafus: ❑ Complete ❑ In Progress � Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
e January 2010 - Mayor Lewis and City Council convened an Urban Core Task
Force to develop a recommendation for a 40-year vision for powntown Auburn
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
• Urban Core Task Force work to be completed November2010
. Take recommendations and City Council direction and work fhrough
comprehensive plan amendments during 2011 amendment cycle
o Potential zoning code changes to Downtown Urban Center zone
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
• November 29, 2010— Urban Core Task Force recommendation to City Council
e 2011 — Coriiprehensive Plan amendment work; if determined not part of 7-year
comprehensive plan uPdafe (see uYban center increased density)
• 2011 or follow amendments to comprehensive plan — Downtown Urban Center
zoning code amendments
Key Issues/Concernsllmpediments:
• Potential City Council adoption of any or all of the Urban Core Task Force
recommendations may necessitate amendments to current downtown planning
documents
. Determine timing of action on the Urban Core Task Force recommendations;
either incorporate as part of the 7-ye.ar update to the Comprehensive Plan by
2014 or incorporate into an annual amendment cycle before 2014
Notes:
k
A�IJBURN
� WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT—OCTOBER 28-29, 201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Medical/Hospital Zone
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visua! Szapport: � Yes ❑ No
� � - � 4 F i '�� Oi.'�� ��1 _K f -_1 y�
� ; :�"`�---'" r.`-� ;��' � ' � Work Completed to Date:
�y'F �y_ /` , C�
� � � �'' � � ��`�, ��-� -� . Neighborhood Meeting held April
� ' �'��`` �-��� � f � 2009 to discuss concept with
_ ' " �� ti,�- �+��-- :��, • - ��_ residents north of 3rd Street
� �� S a� �:� �� � _ - �'; • PCDC determined to put on hold
� � ' � � ,,,,, � G _, .��ti� �'��,� until 2011 annual comprehensive
� ' _ . :� ,=�� �}"., •: �--y= plan amendment cycle
�:,.,, �w. �s_r
�- �. � � _ .. e .
-, .' ,� - ;�;. �� L�- �:' •� ' Work Remaining to Be Completed:
� � �`�S� �si�. . � '� F .�rr '-' _ :
.. a� .:.� . .
,! i•.'=, ��;, � °-'-` ' . `�, ^ • Develop comprehensive policies
�. - ,'�+ w +��- �k". �� ;� �' and development regulations
�' ��� «<' '�� � 'd �� :':.: ' ' . Conduct additional outreach to
��� �--a 4.-�- ' — t • x lirti � residents and other affected
4..:! 1�m�_' 4^ � .L.� ++ ��"
' ' parties
�' . 3` �1 ,tc7�, ir-!- �
� ,, ' ,_,:_<'�i � . ��..�.� •
�`� ' � � � ��— "''� � Key TimelinelDates/Milestones:
��. �` �' _.._.._ _..�.� ^ _
�
� �'� �,;��,,�,�i���` e_ � . 2011 annual comprehensive plan
�:__ ._ _ -- � - � amendment cycle
Healthcara Dls�rict Overlay—April 20G�
Key Issues/Concerns/lmpediments:
. Determine whether to continue pursuing a medical/hospital overlay
. If yes then two options for consideration:
1. Continue with a medical/hospital overlay as proposed in 2009 and
complete that work; OR
2. Regroup, engage Auburn Regional Medical Center as partner in effort and
� initiate new planning process
*
A"uBu��v
WASH 1 NGTON
. AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29, 201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Urban Center Increased Density
Status: ❑ Complete ❑ In Progress � Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
i � �
���� �
�G�� — -T—�— -
� f I ��
�_ �.
� " � �� ��
❑� ; : ���� ��0�
I ��� ' ��� - _ ` �
� '- ��- - ���� �� ��
�� � �,� _ - ��
; �_ � � � �� ��� _ �
- - - � �����
� 1 C � ��� i
����--�� a
�- � . � I�� ������� ��
Work Completed to Date:
• Created Downtown Urban Center zoning designation and regulations in February
2007
• Adopted Design Standards for the Downtown Urban Center zone in February
2007
• Adopted Design Standards for the 4-block redevelopment area (Auburn Junction)
in September 2008
• Passed resolution adopting the amended King County Countywide Planning
Policies related to updated population and housing target numbers in April 2010
• Puget Sound Regional Council — Adoption of Vision 2040 in April 2008 that
established an emphasis on designated regional growth centers/urban centers
for population/housing and transportation funding
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
. Recommendation from the Urban Core Task Force
• Potential City Council adoption of any or all of the Urban Core Task Force
recommendations
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
• November 29, 2010 — Urban Core Task Force recommendation
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
• Potential City Council adoption of any or all of the Urban Core Task Force
recommendations may necessitate amendments to current downtown planning
documents
. Determine timing of action on the Urban Core Task Force recommendations;
either incorporate as part of the 7-year update to the Comprehensive Plan by
2014 or incorporate into an annual amendment cycle before 2014
Notes:
• City Council direction needed on the parameters for analysis and scope for
increased density within the urban center
Inner City Shuttle Service
Beginning February 9, 2010, the City of Auburn, Pierce Transit and King County
Metro Transit created a funding partnership to provide the Pierce Transit Route
497 between Lakeland and the Sound Transit Transit Center in downtown
Auburn. The route, designed by city staff and Pierce Transit, operates in the
peak hours on weekdays from 4:56 AM until 8:25 AM and from 3:41 PM until
7:08 PM and serves primarily as a commuter feeder bus to and from Sounder
commuter rail and regional express bus routes operated by both Sound Transit
and Metro Transit. Since its inception, the new service has carried an average of
approximately 3,000 riders per month and has experienced an average 22%
ridership increase between 2009 and 2010.
' The route 497 is paid for in a five year partnership agreement in which the City
and Metro Transit each pay approximately 40% of the cost ($116,000 each in
2008 fully allocated dollars) while Pierce Transit pays 20% ($ 58,000 in 2008 fully
allocated dollars).
Beginning October 2"d,2010 the City of Auburn and Metro Transit teamed up to
provide the new Route 910 that operates fixed-route and service between north
and southwest Auburn via Auburn Station. The new route provides service from
North Auburn to the North Auburn Business area near Fred Meyer, Loews and
the Auburn Court, downtown Auburn including medical and shopping then heads
southwest to the Supermall and YMCA. The route operates hourly weekdays
from about 7:57 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., and on Saturday from about 8:25 a.m. to 5:13
p.m.
Beginning October 2nd, 2010 the Route 919 has been redesigned. It serves
North Auburn including the North Auburn Business area near Fred Meyer, Loews
and the Auburn Court, before heading to downtown Auburn to serve medical and
shopping needs then heading to southeast Auburn. On weekdays, this route will
also serve the Auburn Senior Center with fixed-route service replacing a former
Dial-a-Ride Transit (DART) service area. Saturday service, when the senior
center is closed, it will continue to operate via Auburn Way S. The DART service
area in north Auburn will be discontinued, as the new Route 910 provides fixed
route service in that area. The route operates between approximately 8 AM to 4
PM weekdays and 8:30 AM to 5 PM on Saturdays.
The routes 910 and 919 are paid for in a five year partnership in which the City
pays 45% of the cost ($ 100,000 in 2008 fully allocated dollars) and Metro Transit
• pays 55% ($ 118,000 in 2008 fully allocated dollars).
1L�'�� �I r �� ��� � JrVrynrl\ ��Y'�� � II� li� 2�
^�+�t •-'� �'. ,L�� J ! (�� c-',
�� ���
� Aubum � �� � ��'```
Sounder �
���' tibu�"�Z �� �
Mountain View 167 Station �' 3rd $t SE � I Jn-
Cemetery �
Also served by � ,,-;r��
Sound Transit {/� i$ �`'�•��.,���
routes: '"'� �,."_';x===-=-
N .�_ �:-«.,. .
566 578 m "
�� �� Supermallofthe
Great Northwest 164
I� ��,
lj ,� f l�l l-! I' '� ���I�
,�� �`� �� � , �I `i i� _
� ��;,--�I � �,I _ '
J�f�� ������JI i.� , �-'--�— �
JL� I ��L�_II_,U, ;� /% ��i -r
�! �.����� ,,. A�—r ,.,���� � �:i
]C!� �.�a� .,�
�_ C� �I �
�� ��` � Auburn Game
'L' ;
�� C'�,�� lc- ��"d�� Furm Park
� I%, ��I �j�' '�'f� �
% J _�^ i`II`=��ii �V�:—
N � i. r. C.�_1, �
1 1'/� �r�I/ ..i�J...._-1 .. I �_ J 1 �
� � � � �
,/ � ���T
l;��r _
Roegner
� Park
�'�' �, N
�
�
m
Family Life
�� Center Cburc m �d
�� Park er Ride � .FAd
� o�, � ., F �,,,,,F,
_ -------�--- �p
--- - - -- -- - -
� .� y
.�:�r-P Cou;�r,.
I67 —� �
� = f 1%
� �
.t_.sZfCi�:t112`� �
- J'���:_�� !d��.�.,��v o�
-� '�� �__ , __ � ��
�!_�,c ,� � Sunset Park
��i�� � � � 2 Park & Ride
i ��, � II� — � Sumner pkVy�IF
� li � � Meadows
` �� '� Golf Links
�,`,\
i� «
Lake Tapps
September 2010 Service Implementation Package A Route(s) 910
� z
z
s, , , r
I
is�
w
�
����;� Nw
3
2
N
�
7 I
� /
AUBURN < �
�,� ry
�
o ��� �
��
� Auburn ' '��
Court �
z =1
� _ s. n�-
Aubum =
S°iitlo� � ,, :: �� :, � �; SE ROute 910
+ 18
� Route 910
cflroosei� �-� �//� Route 910 DART Area
Coun Enf
Auburn
„ Supermall � � o-� Sounder Commuter Rail
- I � . �:_i_ Line&Station
////// �_
► �� , �
YMCA M���- �
. May iZ^.0'0
_ . _ __ KI11g�WI1Cy
J:\ServiceChangePackages\2010\Sept\103PkA.pdf Page 119 Created 614I10
September 2010 Service Implementation Package A Route(s) 919
�
- �, Auburn P&R
�.
� � � i
� � ; � ' Aubum
... � I ���� Senior
/ Center
� ` � � __
Aubum � �
Court � �
_. i . .� AOEurn,, ' IL
Library �`_
/: �
. .., , � Weekday Routing ��
to Senior Center
Aubum " /
Commuter �
Rail
�g SWtion �
/ 18
� � - �j Aubum Senior Center
� �,
�
Auburn
� � � �� Library
♦
A u b u r n � "°°°`° wd�s
� Routing eRective with this change �� �.-s o s ^�
�
R o u t e 9 New routing ^^'"' �
May 20.201a
Route 919 DART area
�Deletetl Route 919�ART area
�— Sounder commuter rai�iine 8 station King Courrty
J:1 ServiceChangePackages12010\SeptNO3PkA.pdf Page 122 Created 6I4I10
.
AiJBURN
� WASHINGTON
� AUBURN CITY COUNCIL ViS10N 2030 RETREAT—OCTOBER 28-29, 201 O
Planning � Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Carnegie Library and Old Post Office
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Supq�ort: '� Yes ' ' No
� a � � � � � ---,-- � jr ;, I, ,� i J I i
�� .�� - ,�
. � �� ' � �
'' �� J �L� � �' " �' I ;
, I r�I�
_ ��' � - -- -� �.� -- !
I j-- .�, i • ` �Y 'I . 1 � �} ���,_, , �.
� . �i� � � � �.� �^:�'` � f
1 i � 1 '1��150 / �� 1�(��
�� , �� / • '� � - =` I� .
sr � �� � � �
_ 1 I
� �
�� '� ' ` "- ; r ��
s ��. , . _ f�-- , x . -��_ . _� �k ��
� � , � �. ��] .
f � ' � - -_ �� '�_�) r ,r..�`
`.�°' ' 7� '� • r � - ��; e � ; � = '• � ` I
� �
�, �.
J`�I �� -� .� _. �' 'i : � ,�
;��� � �t ��� � � �
I � a �
, .k�l.' ' L r —�L _ y ,��-- ,�I' ' I I = _ -
�._ �
: �
..� � ��' ��.
�c_ " I p �
� � A � '_ � "dl ° A '^ e' I9
.' � � .M. "�:: '"� � , � _ — � �� r
L., p� , I :
� Y:
ry, K '� �1 � �� ��w.w.n��. .. � ..r. . :; j�
� y s •
I
, 1 -�_...— __.n. . . ��'1 �y S L 1=—-.-�"l �112 � .�
Work Completed to Date:
. Post Office on the Washington Heritage Register and National Historic Register,
April 2000; Designated King County Landmark 2000
• Carnegie Library Building on the Washington Heritage Register and National
Historic Register, August 1982; Designated King County Landmark 1995
• Initiated conversation with King County on returning the Historic Post Office to
the citizens of Auburn
�
Page 1 of 2
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
. Potential development of historic structure/site regulations (e.g. historic
structures cannot be demolished)
• Potential investigation of local landmarks commission rather than utilize King
County for those services and designate local landmarks
. Potential coordination with current and future property owners on grants and
other methods to insure long-term structural and site maintenance and upkeep
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
• None
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
• City Council direction needed for historical preservation regulations in City code
• City Council direction needed on whether to create a local landmarks
commission and processes for alterations to designated historical structures
Notes:
• Old Post Office currently owned by King County
• Carnegie Library currentiy owned by Robert Smith; Carnegie Endowment
potential grant source for rehabilitation
Page 2 of 2
.
ATLJBURN
WASHINGTON
� AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29, 201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Develop Environmental Park.
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
. Wetland enhancement plantings and installation of an information kiosk at the
Campbell site on Western Avenue was completed in 2007
• Installation of additional native plantings and bat boxes at the Campbell site was
completed in 2008
• Construction of the Western Avenue bird and wildlife observation tower was
completed in June 2009
. Acquisition of the 29-acre Auburn Land Co. property in September 2010 completed
the City's acquisition of the 115-acre AEP Phase 1 area
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
• Update of the AEP Master Plan (draft plan was completed in 2007). Master Plan to
address AEP programming, management, maintenance, future acquisition and
development, etc.
• Design, permit, and construct habitat enhancement buffer plantings along east side
of SR 167 and the initial segment of elevated boardwalk/trail (approximately 2,000
feet extending from West Main Street to Western Avenue)
• Complete the acquisition of properties in Phase 2 area. The City is currently
discussing potential acquisition of two parcels totaling 57 acres with WSDOT
• Complete the design and construction of the Mill Creek Wetland 5k Reach project
(this is a separate project that will affect development of the AEP)
• Potential construction of additional viewing platforms/areas and trail segments
connecting the AEP with the Interurban Trail
I
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
. May 2011 — WSU IDeX project (separate, but related) scheduled to be complete
. May 2011 - Deadline for completion of RCO grant-funded trail improvements and
habitat enhancements
• Fall 2011 - Complete design of Mill Creek, Wetland 5k restoration improvements
(separate but related project)
. Spring 2012 - Begin construction of Mill Creek Wetland 5k improvements (separate
but related project)
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
• Long term, the AEP will require a management plan that includes annual monitoring
and maintenance (currently not planned or programmed)
. The 2007 Draft AEP Master Plan needs to be updated to reflect the City's decision
not to develop the AEP as a certifed wetland mitigation bank
• The provision of additional parking and connections to the adjacent street network
and the Interurban Trail will be key to increasing public use of the AEP
. The existing RCO grant funding for trail development and habitat buffer plantings
has a May 2011 expenditure deadline
. Future development of the AEP will need to consider (and for the most part, avoid)
the existing 57-acre wetland mitigation site for the Emerald Downs project, and the
future 20-acre wetland mitigation site for the A Street Extension project
Notes:
1. Total acreage of AEP (Phase 1 and Phase 2 areas) is approximately 240 acres
2. Phase 1 area is approximately 115 acres, which is owned by City.
3. Phase 2 area is approximately 125 acres, ownership as follows:
a. City owned: 2 parcels totaling approximately 36 acres
b. Other publicly owned (WSDOT): 3 parcels totaling approximately 57 acres
c. Privately owned: 7 parcels totaling 32 acres
�
AuBu�
WASHINGTON
• AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT—OCTOBER 2H-29, 201 O
Planning 8� Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Develop Green Zone
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
„� ��,��"��,-„'� �
�+*. � , a� � . -,
�, �t � .. i .h jR,�"t'': � � � 1
_'�,a�+�y � . ".�� y"��'` � ,,� ' ..�1 �4 .';"{' .i;�,
"�d
vn. , p
- � `�` 'r '�tl �,"�� ; . ;..,.-�1'
* X1 ..:� �� i � ' . F ;'� � �.
x � . di �s. � ,r � hV� r' ' '�����r'��
4 ag'' �,;� "r' � ' �.� , �� ' � � . ' ' �.
y � � f�f y'y�1..
!C�,� ����rL �--CI m. . ]�I;r � w� �1
���r� ' : ..,�,.',. � Green j .,�,�:��
I�� ,� . � ., "�
- Y.r i�. � � 20110 �� -�"�.'.
��' ' '� � „ � �� f� ' a , '- �.�`',
� �' � i
. f��;0'��ix �� � .: . ^✓"i'� " � ' J f _
+"`� 1`� � $y ii�^nY���S c I.
� 4. �y T
�3� 'r� '� .'�r � '' 1 !G .ri+'� y� +'�"
I � ��'n�' . ,.I * ^ ,i" '� �^� .i
�^^,� iw � v� '�'�`` �� •�.'3' `� :
A� � � '�C
� � ..,f� , �� 'Si r�i �
� ,� s'i r �.,�, �
�.�;A*1 a i p�/ �,y� y r. �` _
kh �..�'Q. ♦ P'� : �/�la. yy� �Ey S�t J� . / � � �•.l
, � ., l�{i J' �✓ . �+
�, M�. ��' P .yi•..wi � .'�^,�y- _ -
��iir^�' ��� �`—� ., t1'� _. ��YY''t . ._ -- _
Work Completed to Date:
• City Council approval of Resolutron No. 3944 in November 2005 approving the City
of Auburn Economic Development Strategies- included AEP Green Zone Strategy
. City Council establishment of new zoning designation - Environmental Park- in
2006
• Update of Chapter 18.33 (Environmental Park) initiated as part of Phase I Code
Update Project in 2008-2009
. Joint meetings with Planning & Community Development Committee and Planning
Commission in 2009 on Green Zone - consensus developed on incentive based
approach to attract green development to area
• Inrtiation of ASCENT(Auburn Scientific Center for Emergent New Technologies)
• planning and development effort in 2009 led by Deputy Mayor Singer &
Councilmember Wagner
• Submitted$1 million public-private partnership (City ofAuburn, GRCC Small
Business Assistance Center, Dr. Mathur) grant to HUD as part of 1-6 Chal/enge
Grant for short-term and long-term fundrng for establishment of ASCENT
• Strong new relationshrp with Washingtan State University Institute for Sustainable
Design developed by Councilmember Wagner for green oriented site and
infrastrucfure planning and design efforts in zone including.•
o Western Avenue Green Rebuild Project
o Developing a "Green Aesthetic"for the Auburn Environmental Park
o WSU IDeX project
• Targeted economic development recruitment into zone for existing and new green
businesses
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
. Coordinate with Councilmember Wagner & WSU Institute of Sustainable Design on
IDeX project
. Develop Comprehensive Plan policies and updated Chapter 18.33 regulations
. Develop existing uses transition strategy for non-green oriented businesses and land
uses to minimize economic disruptron to City and existing businesses
. Refine Green zone economic development/marketing strategy
• Develop ASCENT strategic implementation plan
• Work with Public Works Department on short-term and long-term physical
infrastructure improvements strategic plan
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
• May 2011— Completion of WSU IDeX project
. Mid-2011 — End of 2011 —Annual Comprehensive Plan update
• Late 2011 — Mid 2012— Update of Chapter 18.33 (Environmental Park)
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
• Identification of Green Zone in regional economic marketplace — area is still viewed
as light manufacturing/warehouse and distribution area
• Public and private sector infrastructure update — Green Zone will need targeted
updates in its public infrastructure (i.e. streets, water, sewer, stormwater) and private
infrastructure (i.e. broadband, electric) to compete with other similarly designated
areas in region
• Green zone is a historic manufacturing and residential area — need strategic
approach to facilrtate transition of area away from these uses to green business
. Types of incentives to be offered by City— primarily non-financial— and packaging
and presentatron of these incentives to the marketplace
• Mixture of uses wrthin the Green Zone — potential incorporation of limited residential
uses within zone
Notes:
. Waiting on WSU IDeX project completion to help inform policy and code updates
#
AiJBURN
WASHINGTON
. AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT
Parks, Arts & Recreation Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Develop Community Center at Les Gove Park (#32)
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
��r _���������� ��
�,.
� � i �:. � ' � ,'. '
a � `'�+, ���� �; � � �'
t �
� M
7��.. . �.� �. ��: �. P��
_ -� � � —�..� .
. �. �r .: �1 ^ .� :g._� , #�.�i_ y�� . _. _..
af �f . w 7 7._�
�=� — �� r � `F. 4��aY'y�r���` ,�y ,.�rt�,.�:�'
�,�... � _ . �. .?W.. � Al'.�;y � ..a�..
<,-
� -
._. �.�. . L_�.,- .. __ � ,,��=b
` ' �—'_ : . -.-
��
- �� �' `� � -
�.�„
..� •, �x ���/YYy�� �� y � b��•�
.�^ 51 iA�� I�.tL'.^"+�'^+�"'� _
.._. .��T. - .__ '+• i . .:1._.. �'- �^� _..
9CFhuiuc:o.:c� n.^ilr:iu.nllliul�:��ion
Supporting Documents Attached: � Yes ❑ No
Briefing Paper related to Auburn Community Center
Work Completed to Date:
A & E Completed, project bid in early 2010, bids not accepted due to financing.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Recognize and approve source of funding. Re-bid project, construct.
.
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones: December 2010, the city will receive
notification related to New Market Tax Credit option.
Key Issues/Concerns/impediments: Funding
Notes:
« . C.ity of Auburn�
� � .: ,; �' =/ Aubu�rn Community C,enter
• at Les; Gove Park Campus:
Proje<t Request
The Ciry of Aubum is requesting 57.650.000 in
funds ro develop an approxima[e 20J 00 square
foot community center building to be used for
educational,cultural,social actevities and large
non-programmed communiry meeting spaces. , , ;. �
The joint-use faciliry will feature a spacious and � '�� - +
welcoming lobby and a large communiry ga[her- ^'� �
ing space for up to 350 people as well as divid- T±, � ----1: - -^-�;_ ; , ,
able space for recreational activities,programs _,r .r- �, �
and dasses.The center also indudes meeting ' � t y���"-° ' ' ' '
space/dassrooms,lobby,kitchen,resrrooms � --a- ,r,..��� .���: '�^�
and storage. Area will also include office space, i�,j3� '
meeeng rooms,break room and administrative
areas for approximately 20 full-cime and seaso�ial � �-'` �
Parks,Arts&Recreation emp loyers. , �r p
� � . .,���' [, .
Project Description f
+a►��'�.c��.`
The City of Auburn is without a dedicated qath- � v._..� , r'�; .
ering space for a population of over 65,000 people. Ac;oi dinq to:+ 2u05 S� �„��
A�burn Parks,Recreation and Open Space Plan,the City of Aubum should '
have one CommuNry Center available per 40,OD0 people and is deficient in ���";,
[his rype of faciliry. i r t� � . - _
The new Community Center will serve the entire communiry and be open Les Gove Park and
year-round.It would be used for various health,fitness and wellness pro-
grams;multf-generationalandmulti-cufturalevents;specialevents;evening CommunityCampus
family programs;art craf[and music comrnuniry education and specialty
dasses;expanded youth and pre-school programs;meetings and mrporate At nearly 21 acres,Les Gove
events;wedding receptions;and Park is a recreational a�d
educational campus serving the
The City of Auburn has invested in the design phase o#the Communiry Cen- entire communiry.The cluster of
ter and funding would be used for construction. amenities in this campus indudes
the King County library,Parks and
Benefits Recreation Administration Building,
Senior Activiry Center and White
• Conhibute to mmmunity pride and foster a sense of community-create River Valley Museum.The campus
a communiry gathering place for neighbors,family and friends ro meet also mdudes the popular Rotary
- Offer a broad range of activities promoting sodal interaction,espedally Spray Park a play struaure,public
with new residents of Aubum arL bocce courts,horseshce piu
• Provide maximum FlexibiViry and multiple uses through design;adapt- and two softball fields.A helf-mile
able ro changing mterests paved treil encirdes an attrattive
• Provide a facility that is financially feasible.affordable for participants, bermed and treed area.7he Ciry of
and can generate revenue to affset a portion of operating costs Aubum offers a diverse population
of over 65,000 residenu.The Les
Gove neighborhood is an area
City Contaets with a diversiry of land uses and
Pete Lewis,Mayoc City of Auburn a diversity of people.The area
253-931-3041 �plewis(dauburnwa.gov adjacent to the Communiry
Center indudes single-family
Daryl Fabec Parks,Arts&Recrearion Director neighborhoods,multi-family areas,
253-9313043�dfaber@auburnwa.gov and a retail(commerciap area.
� ....,..... �.....
CITYOf �_* r
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2O$O RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29, Z01 O
Planning & Development Department
Brie�ng Update for 2016 Vision Goals
�sion 2016 Goah Unification of New Communities
Stafus: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporting Documents Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
Throughout the history of Auburn, various people g�oups fiave been represented in the
valley. Preseritly there is more diversity than at any time prior.
Intentional outreach has begun to engage these populations in a ciyic conversation with
the goal of increasing their involvement and access to local government and services.
A Diversity Roundtable was established to help identify some of the particular
conVersations and issues Ehat.are important to each group. This forum is intentionally
kept as an open place for discussion without judgment and a thinktank for fu#ure efforts.
The group isalso primarily involved with the concept of the Gommuniry Connections
Center which will serve as a hub fo� diverse groups to interact with one another as part
of the greate�community while celebrating their distinct heritage and tradifion.
Neighborhood meetings have be.en taking place through the efforts of the Administration
department in cooperation with various city departments. From these meetings come
locale-Specific issues that are unique to the neighborhood. By responding with the
affected departments, neighborhoods are able to find solutions for theirparticular
concems. This forum begins the process that leads to subsequent meetings such as
Safety and Blockwatch.
In addition to diverse populations as target groups, fhe outreach to new communities on
the hills, as a result of the recent annexation, have been part o.f th.e engagement effort.
The unders.erved neighborhoods that exist in the apartments and the mobile home
parks have also been recognized and involved.
Various communication tools have been employed to keep fresh conVersation and
feedback happening while working to ensu�e a constant and direct link to the issues at-
hand.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Establish Connec4ions Center
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
Financial uncertainty and ability to leverage support in all of the needed areas
Notes:
*
cmoF '11� .
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 2$-29, 201 O
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: DevelopmentofAirpoit
Status; ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
Airport Aerial
Airport with high/ight parcels (red) Attached
Supporting Documents Attached: � Yes ❑ No
Airport Aerial, RFP Document issued 5/2008, Advertising (May, June, July 2008),
Addifional Information, Cover Letter
Work Completed to Date:
• Runway Over/ay comp/eted in 2004.
• New taxiway constructed and comp/eted in 2009.
. RFP was comple#ed May 2008-Advertised in Puget Sound Business Joumal,
Seattle Time, Genera/Aviafion News and other aviation business media. Direct
mail to aviation businesses and otiier which had expressed interest. On/y one
proposal received which did not meetrequirements.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
. Runway lighting replacement to be comp/efed in 2010.
• Contact is still being made with various aviation business entities, but none are
anticipating and expansion nor moving thelr businesses at this time
• Improvement to west side property to prepare for development
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
. 2004 Runway Repair and Overlay Completed
• 2009 Tax.iway Reconstruction Completed
• 2010 Runway Light Replacement December 2010
Key Issues/Concerns/linpediments:
In an economia downtum as the nation is in now- aviation is the first to suffer and one
of th.e last industries to recover. As the economy improve.s issuing the RFP will be
revisited.
In respects to the Westside 23 acres conceptual development plan, a Potential/mpacfs
and Permitfing Requirements was prepared by EAS Adosfson.
There were 4wetland impac.[ed areas ident�ed:
a. 11.88 Acres
b. .12 Acres
c. .O6 Acres
d. .04 Acres
Tota/ 12.1
Airport staff has added to the FAA Capital lmprovement Plan included$5:1 mi/lion for
the acquisition of the now einpty Columbia Bank building and property and tiie raw land
owned by a Canadian investment company. Whether or notthese funds will be
available in 2014/2015 is unknown.
Notes: The airport has made dramatic improvements from a complete "runway
overlay in 2004 to a new taxiway in 2009 and new runway lighting system in 2010
to be completed. Wifh the additional improvements to hangars and security
helps position the airportto emerge from thiseconomic downtum in a stronger
and more desirable position in the aviation industry and within the community.
The partner§hip with the FAA, State and othe� aviation businesses will pay
dividends when a meaningful recovery begins.
, - ,� : _ _
� .� ��`- a, : f - — , ar
_ . . ,~ �"�- �.�,� _ : . ` �s � �
�. n . , �
i _ .} +' #��� � �� '�I_� # ; « r t1 : -'�I r ��
� F >_ _. . �. �, I � , w• � �i.'� � � �
"` ' �,._"•�`�� ,
( . . _ . • � ' r. `
t .
. �K � s ' . _.. L� '_X � .. � t-_ *�� . ' � h �
��,rti,� ...= i
� ` "t:�..;� L! _ _ - -1 ,! r• �4 i��� � � � . �1� �
� - � �flf' 1� � �.�. �9 � r• � ♦
_ r { � j • � - '. �+�. , _e' 1 � � �
yleb. r
I:� ` 1. � u � � �, � ' , , c , � �: � A `�� �
� -�- q ? , ; , , � � � -`�►`
- � �i f'� " '� 1,�� �1 ' � ���•' .i-. -.. ^�+��� � � � � � "+�.'�
' � .a1A 1: r�1 .. , �s. �,r .� �„�, « � 4 � .
� ', � - :( il � .'RRy''i�� �� �� _�L7�� ~��� . , �� " •
_ � �i '7 � � 4 i � - '
�' 1 � t� r� �1: ., � �� •
� ( -`e � �.� .N. � �,[-�f�k Ss� ,� � �� * �f+
. � f, � 9 .�� F �.ryyy,, � � � 3 � .
1 r � .J ,1° ) _ �' �4j���-- .�� a �� �� j� ,� ,� �� . ..
. . � � �j-' . r� �' � � ., • + �
� l� i
� 't '�' 11� i � ' '�,� r �' 1 � � i
�y f � � ' . Y�. �I :i.' .�1 , , ,�;� ��, �., �', �' 1 �
�� ' � �j '� � `���, ; � -T� t . _ .,.' '� : � �^ t + . � �; � yI
i � � , J '. K 4�� f� �i�`.�. 1 �._ I 1 � ..:.._ �� �'� �' + �'`
�' �I �.. � ts.i" �F= �tif ``_•�,� � �'
J ■ " F', '�•,
f � .� �. �.:. - k. ' �1r,
.- q f � � � �. � , r ,
�M- ' + •
(� �. � � �` � _ � ' �f '�� ' � � � I�1
� � , 1 - -- f-.� ♦_ , . � .,,� 1 � � � �' � � r � t �r �� ��;� -
.,. i �� • �.t �y�, i� /��t � I�� .�* � 3 ' . i
_ . �d � '- .�.' . , � ir �.� � - �� ' "_� ♦
• � r
•
�
� �' ' I � ,
� ,
.. � .i i � i. � * . . �� E � � � - �• � � � � �� � , y � p
w,. ..a�. � f .`� . � . '•t.'�' . �/�s �i - '� 1�i �(' . � F . . ��-� ` `�. +� � !`�•� �� � � ,,, �
i �. � ' _l 4� 1�� - �� . � � , � ' � =�
� , �.,� { �� ' i � ����� � � - o P . `-+ �
� � . - �a..�'+1 � '� �� � , ����1 ? � � i�
� , - �. .� ..�-� 'r .d fi � t ' �'��
Y • �E� + '� ..� ' �, -' -
a• r � t�l!'�.� y ,:,__ . F. .
,
_ . . � s - • .�-�.� [ ' �:� �.: t , ��. . � -� ..
� � ;;�, s , .+ " . ` �.� L • , ,. ` ��" ��' t, � 9 � � ,► ya, �M,�
rl :� �� �!�".." , rs ai ,� , .-. � , . . . , . �� � � � 7�.� .. a+
r' M 1 {� + , M }[� ♦ M :�i� • ' { { , }
� � �N' �' k� ( �1 '��y�1�� ! «�t:�'�� �. � �.m .` T� l.�1. A, ���� *
� '� � _ • , � - .. - " ' s[.a�, �•. r _ � �s � � � .'� !�_
� , � _-, - . ��� *` :t�r �� ,�� �` q�, ,.�i� ` .1�. r. �j,, f � w� e' �. ' �. 1� �r�"�
� ��a � � , " � r ,
' ; a . ,r i � ; . �r�t ,�J '•' l� � s�� `�-��IrF .�1 �, � ¢� �
�� Ir �� ; � =� � ■♦ � 'T : 'j{ ' � �
_ !. � �� � � ��' • . 'i+��^+�• �.���J� �''�f .t�. w, �• � r �1 �, " . '_ �� � �'� • ' 1
'1i . � / I � . �-i � I � � � . � � ! • ' � . . � � � .� ♦� � � � � ..
+� ( � i - , ..` � � � � ! ', '-�. �[ . � �
� . � a. ' r � �
�� ' �� _ •,1 �♦ ��} •�'� , r • ; �i� . + r i b � , .. �y�� . ,��_
� _ . � rr
,�o- =� / 1•� � +i ., � r y�• � 1 .� � � � .�_
�,�'t_ ��. 1 �_ �4 . , . • .. � r . . � � . � 1 �� �' '
� '� ' - �.• ,..�.� �-i 1 'w� ,+, � �F`� ��'sT � r �-'��'kLLt; t �
r � .� I' � � V ni, �� � ',4' • ��{� R ' M' � — �
- � � , _ �, • • y , � � _ ' _ �"
q _ 1�- . �t ` M = r r ,� '�l ,� -�� �1. 3 �•��. ' �; ' IF�i �. y r� � _' � � � '� . • _ -��1.�:� t
- �.� t�; � �r � _ — -- • . .. � � � .�'" � l �I _ r .� � r �� _� • ' • � ~i $. � * _
( � h'
1 bt _ ,T .� � � * ,
� � � � �� � ``Y�� • c��� �, • � � � � � ` ��� � '� r . I � ,, ♦, � ` ;�N�t l� � , � . �
i y �� . , �" a ' Q�'� ; , � .� ,ar�., � ' 1 t '�� ; j. � }
. 1 � I I . . �� ; �� ! .�\ T f �� ia�i:
1. ` LL� � �' ' g - �
: � ' . _ _ - - � ` �� . �. � - _ -- . � ■ � . - ��' � "�' ,fY rc� �� .=t'
�`
- �� __ � . � :� . . .� _ ..
_ ' r'� -
w. �'- � �.� . ��� ir � p� e�-� � � IL.i,Z �� .. _ _ _ ,. ''�4 c . ,- ��. _ r.:4
'` �i1� -'w�:.r��wxAC,;lftt4!�q.�r- - � ��'; x+^ y�.,-,1 ,.awu�fl. :_y �f�ti.� _
. .:�. � +a'r. E -— �n. �� -a �
� - '
. _. . . ... _ -� �--- � -- — --- - a�-,m. •
�"W`'-. �r,y 'y'Si�--�a r u•N�'7i 7i'�t�lvFf{�T�`ro7' y _ � - -. . . -. _�._ . � -- , �,,C' -. ..`
•� � .
., , �_ -.._....... ',i .. �r.�.tV�� . i
t �� :.
-r ?„ -'1.'T � z.�. - 4'1 t .
� h:�a . ... - R r?� m2�ant��n iw»,�T^�� . l� .� � _ _. 30TH ST NE. .. ' J .� . . ' . .
__ x u +..; � . :.
F.�j �, "" M > . . '� �' aoa�� AIRPORTADDRESSES
. ; � t F 30TH ST NE
.'� —=a � -� • ,�..a�,�s,�.�.
I "�t • �e.-� . — -� aoe „� =. , , ' ,,,
� +- 30THSTNE�.y�.� � -. � � )
— �k, �.�2• H�i ��f � . { 'S r>" � l► _ � � Ix n.� d _
,�., y .' t� + r R w'- .
I��d. � � i�.� M� _�� � �, ' _ , � � i. ,
- -_ ` �-' -�'.�.'.��.'- " ' � �..�0 1 .�. �i Ij�.�aij' .T� �i"r�
iL'N s�� t -.. - 414 30TH ST NE � � � . ��� i Se�n ..'�'s
_ � �T ..�i 30THSTNE /�a� � � "' � ^ �rn
I�� .Tn� �i.�d ' � �. [�� a .� � , � f �
� . �Y y +.:n M'�' �_
�� .�� T'� ' ,'��'1 - Y" �L&""`. <19 •-�( 'L ,�� �i ;,''" `�°��i.a�- �,, �I
l,a ��I ^ ,.. aori-i sr Nc 7 _ � `.�71 ' . � -pa�e -"'
. . ' . 30TH ST NE � -'�,w. a�.�� 422 . � '.C� �'.� d'� �..I
�'� ' � 30THSTNE ~ _.'� � � H .i��•1 .y„�
'_ .- � - �.. . ,k.i k - ��is^� Y .. �. . : �- *' .r! �Y -��.i
_�. ' t , _ �..,.r _� . '., �: � {( -_ _ _. ` r' _ _ w ..�. _ �'+--��j
1 �
e .n - i t l . . � 'NE N _' �-_— -.__ . . : _ ��-.t ` :514�_�,# . ' .
�� - !d� I • , .Jl�f'y,'�� � 1'.. .1�'•'Y F y��: � � � � �.f_• I
� . .y' I
� � . :. . r ' .. - .�..� - ... . k�M = ._._ � r� m'� _% ��;� {�-
� � _ - � . ,� 7�.. � � .-, . __. L!-�� . I� `�F��';II
< <
� .�" � �i 11.' �
'�� � I ° ' � ,..,I
_' _ i � A�1 j� -•f �_C�.- �� ,�, i ' 3 � ���8"ai
i ..�+,
II, . _1 - I, : . �� ,•� : . •�� � �. � `� �sn �� '_- ''-.�r an�,ri,. ,n.inr�� ' i� �� I
��R.,-:� u n�� I�,i�� ' . � � � . � '_ .-.. +ar ` � a �..}�'a' '� ' ' +bl ' � ��'.
�►i , ; � �— �, � ° d �_-� , ��-� �a� ��,.,..
$� � ' �i
In I�e•,t��_�I ar-e _n..�➢ `3 I'�'3^-i�i.� A I � � � R � � q� �� .�Z�'� ._'"- ,f," 9 � �� �j. . F
� aaa.«��i"�1� � . � � n.� r �' i- : . �ff �"_ r� - ��a� ;"�
M
�6�rnL,�ea�ne:' ' ' � i �. �` � � +�i 'r4tw` . r r�;.�7� '.� � '` d
i �m., �7 '. ��:{� �., I :�= �� •, g' '�'-. ... . L �'\-.Y;� :..
a
- _ I � I �. ' �26TH�ST-NE °,. 'd � �. �I s : nF�LH15T '� tr. . :. ee
i
. ..;�- ' -"r _' . ' .' �' '. � _ " + �1� - . u' -� ` U I .
.i, � . ' � � I _�. ` }� r� �<"J cl� :� ., .
:. - �� / I t +°'_ni.rynr �f10..�wr�+ �f J } ■��+►, �1
'F. .. _ ,I dq ,�'�, .,: � � >1 it � �._ �� _. i :��f, � � ' �. k.�"I ..- !� ` T"
1
j �r MI K` L�.�< 1 . i
�. �_�� � �, �r . . ' � �t��� t -s, -P � rir.,� : �,
�� � � �� � �
, . , . i � n�.�•r nr�, � 'F y�L" '� tlM4s�
���.�� :. ���� ��3 ��',�l :fi5'' � � � �ii ��: r � ,,4'�^ ��(r � .� •�}� �
rE ST NE � � '.:� '<9 E T NE ' C � -�;j �'`��Lv i a''�.
I 1 .. . .. . tl�! �� y . .,Z�.n..r ,I �K � y I'�� a �'�. _s�
ti L +� T� +. �II
1i II � 4
(. i " .r:�� 2515 � 44'.e�i,. . � `,�W1: �"�t� � ''r_... 71' ��� �n« ,. '_
� E 57 NE .. . . _�w i�� s_� - (:� �Cj "
N. r:- --s= f �����
. . ..� ' z o� m n. n� � -� , � df'G , � � ?C
� i Y�sos -�i � � + � r • �. _ wq � ie
r NE . � y �y
� � � ESTNF � r Rhti��- ' k �. "`T �� �' f ��.�� �y� J
: y yr 'I �y(las� 4.{� . �o�� y ) o+
... , r . .,I '� � r�l i ' ._� ` �• y fV�� `.���.I
, ,� � , �fi_ _ , _ �
� - - -�� � m���,�,,. - - .�..
�.r.. ' - _ i I yLI ' . �.�.�� `� � � iu v..=`/sF�'h�M� J ��...,_ t��.yAqr, ` f� � I
�, )� �� �:
4 L N�
�. . . 3 ` i l �a� . ' ' yi� �u
� - +�t.a.. 1 � � � � J � ! �-y - � ,� . •� � -" J� C' I
:>t _h�-�_. . • � , rr r ' ,' �I � `�. _ I i�i ��:.n����a � c � rl ni� � ��� � ����I
�
� i�'��5*'�� .av'� „ �, . . . � � ,ti : ;1 ' _ �
�i � ! � '� . 1yN 1 . ._ �� -dpjl ' W��lu 111M141�Ib_� } �Yl �� 1� ' � �
♦ l' '1� .:� �t,�•.,^ 1 4 � __�.�.�� . , 11 l _:7 R . �
� #'F.A n}x'+�w. i�Y'�� t n'Ml,.}a.�"D?aa'��t,�i 1:�'�rpF 1 'I y.. - ' ;.�'4� __ :.F 1 e �A �, ... ! � f , .
b ZF T�
lJ /t y... .�"��P k � lL - .. . " . : � /� 1 . �LL'� ' `'` . r � �. �r
T �
__ �, � � , . -�� r ,: .�-, F � �E ,. , � r.— ,=—
, � � � Z — �
_ �.� . . I �`�--� •�JJ' N�-, YG , J Sp y�y�� �IL
� p.. ' . .. . ♦�� ( ay � ���� � II
. rd.4' �. " ,�1 . �i � � i� ;.�' "__i +��r l� n�.i f + tP 'r • ��?� �
__
, .• ' . ,�. ' _ .
� ; ; � � , - ��� , �� y : ' —,-g?F'!� ,,,, M, r,�—..�
i_ -_ ,� , �� �` - s � �
S � �. ��'. � •,. 4 � '� � � �, S "�"� ��� � � 'ao rme� r � :��� .f. � �57�( ��q.. � � '__ ��,� '�
I ; � , �, .� " : �
i inx "ps�. , y � ` ' - -- ... i ..I
+ f�� . . r' "" ``'h��i'r � � � ESTNE-.: _. � _ • �..�
� Y �«Y I �. �I�^ . ' . 1■ i i [ �I
� W �R L-
i�.. Sih' i{'�a� �' � ��a � 1 ��' �, .,1"':';' �� �`� r �1� �� ��}�_lL � 'I
;.��~ r ;V f. t�: ' . a."� . �. � ��w. iI :Yt S! I �f�.�
,
.�, _
:.
... �� � M ) S Y^'� �•.�I
Y' �J
I - '� { � � �ry � J/ .v�i�!� i ff - W' . � �f �.�f _�- :` '�
.i ,r HI E NE. -iy. �-_ , t - . 1�� � ' ' iF��� 1��,{ �1-� � � �~-p�'.
.. _
. -
-. � �I � :'�-. ' + P�
��.
_ :,��. „ y. w: .-
w
. II i II 4
�
�I �„ «.�. v .s'a,tll..s,.�
�� ��d� . J 2�23 �E - - -. `� _ -.,, •i ���s -�- ,S�.,T���� �``___ �'�4.c.1,
�� �y,' �l � ESTNv: . �i � � x 6 v..� r � � � . ,�
'` .I . h' _�i.y ^' 'E'-- --' � �-��1-= tJ"'' .
� �o,s � �� ��� � � i�� F
� � rsrNE ^� �t ��_ - �_ i � � . � 1
� •��f Y,L �{ A�it~..�,� o� r ��IO' 1n ti ,�P �. . 1 F ,�, � � <-1 �7 F•.�.
�
J �� 3��� r� ,���� �. r ,. < � _ `"'� - I
i . , 2007 ' -c. k-, . . � . _ .� 4'. ^� .. �� �"n ` yi.,.n-:
�v �
' i
. . + ��e�ni� .en.or r I
t ..— . M P� . +. .�. -
� _
'� I . i
, ` R
. ����,�� ..
. ' ` � �I .�. .�.t��
.,� ESTNE � ifSi___�5 �.. .� _: _
:�. � � . . i _ . .�� . .
`" � �'� ..4^"�#9��Y .��v. .�, '�. . } - . +r.— [ ._
� .. ` - � �
_ _- p 1827 '� � . , .. . .. . .: __—_,"�`� + . ' F Y . T�t
� �_.. .. � � . E��� � � . �s. ; �, .w�+'_�.. ,�w�El� � l� .a" • �;I
� ' ��. � ' � _ �. f I ST NE •n,� �y�� I'_ � ' i _ �� '
� -�fi �. '��. � �_ . . ,_.�� , � T' � ay, � ' ' ` .
:.. � 827 - _ --. r. : - __ ._ . �.��
..._ _. _ ���' , "�� . ESTNE � - —._ . �� J. �� �,'t = _' ,�_�. _ - ' __�.II
� " .� „b ' ' . '� ,,, I . ' � _ .`Gr.
_ _ � ' 4`�r.if�.G !R"� �y7�„ � •� - - r � � 'y� � • ��
� . - K ' I
,� : �-r�� �"n"'^` " '�� r � i � .r __ . ^'���'"'t ' " �6: r� ,.
. .. . , i �- .�.� _t v � '^ .'. -' �i t9N� . � � p . �G �' ' �c `�A
• M —
, A:I � ' * � - ' iB09 6 ' :r� y.�
�f' "cr
� , k:u�ff �' . -. . ... ,-:� � - ' �. : , 1501 E '�, `t n . ..P� .. t�..�.
_ ,
�.ry � , . � E ST Nb I � n r.� %a ' ' q:
��� _�� , . . Y �� � � _ "F705 � ~� �, E ST NE f=.•. � 1 .e .. �" .
f.: � �: ' � y • . I �Th�� � .�S �.��`� J.� . ' ". .. � -
i
�j . , •
, . . tiS:. 1{1 y'' .. � n �. - ' ,:. i-.: ..I +t - '� -1�� �r��y,°�,`� � ., c .. _ _.. 6. R�
� F
• � ♦ ' ._ { , 1 �,� E,, � .
'�' ... » _/ . " i . .. �� ...., . _. ; ��a+�- �'<Lws(L� '�sy..rx4,.•. ..�• 8
I t ,'��.I.:l N vV .�r•-P�f.�' y�' "�' r�' � ' .:-.i -N�"ry ,..� . . ...3 L M3�t `�E �.7 I�f!!ui u i r.�It�u r l �'F" � .
- � . �~�..� �JJ _ , L 1` �- ,� ' ,! fl x�I
;;r-I �� � . �`- .. . , �- � _ . ,, ._. _ . ir �� _ . �`
4` I • .i > . J . `. : � ��J� :"'r'�� ' . �:, � �'` '�-C_. � .. ,�r�
I �,. 1 ' _ r`.'� . . a . � - . k4 � � ,f � rs _- {I � P . c' �. y ,
i .t . '� I � P� �fl (-y' . (1�'J ; � er. � � ey �w �;F
r:
.
' �e , '� � �a^ �
, ,.. . -_ � .. �" 1 'Y' 'IWr �� � '
. yn��� _ - . . t ���:nl" �� .. /� 4'f n7, ;e � ' _�
i � �." " ` �l ._. , tT y, � . . . �{ � 1P�-'1i `�'hl � � �� w`u h
. �- �- :r— � [ � �
�
. rj � m � � " ....�rf�._�.� T � �I. ��� � i� ..i f l '
'I t . � Y �� �= � �.. n�•. . !, �:�1 � ,; �.x. „e �siL� 3 -'� , �
ii � �- .k ,_ r -. : � .�, �, : ` u _
-r '" �r' ..r
� m r �� " �� ' 3��I W� �+ • � .� R it-� '-�n
_; II � �,,, � ni a . �4
� W ..A � Yl� � .^�.� � ut� � �sy^_ � �T� _ I � � Ipl �� I ��
� � F
.� a�. I
� , �—
�`. �I ��. �._� r i� xn � i�� V L � � � . t _j s � � �- -�+� ...,, � .. rl
1 �'� -� - �v i � � ;I �� t
� �I 1 �Y•.�`� '-�4�TI�'�FC.. T � F,IC1I f `�4s I . �I M �'ti lli. i tij �'] .
. � r. a _ :. � „ . a � �: � � i � ° _i -y o- �
� , � � �
��� �^{rii i�a `�vin i ��F�>c: � I � �� - O �iwri� e � CI� ��j�i r�� ' � ' 'ln qr. �y:. �� y�ai� � � �
�(R;,�, ._ C u.,. �n�titt: ��a�.rt � �.' .1Q .. � ' y ( � 5,
4 �<:.-' �.,.: I 4 �� �. �'� ��� r � � �} � � W.:.� '� '_ 1f a1���u � � ..._ ;1�311 C NF �°' :�r 'l Yy
-. :_�,,.� _���'�� ,sa�.� �,i+n „R .�:���_ , , , t4„ �., _ _ � �: �, ,- � ;; �jt ��_.3'� '��
i M ii
p f- ' .. 11'.5'T NW - i —.._'. . _ �. .-iTl i c �, _ . ' . . __ _ � ��� �� `� �
r�
�
. " ....-- .= .__._, ` _ _ - - ' + i�- ��' � f . ' `r ,
�
� C17YOF �^* x
WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2O$O RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29,201 O
FINANCE.DEPARTMENT
.
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Relocate Airport to Academy
$tatus: ❑ Complete � In Progress � Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
. Aubum Municipal Airport
. Acaderiiy Site
Supporting Documents Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
• Gontact made wifh Auburn Adventist Academy
• In-person Meeting wifh Academy/eadership
. Phone conversafion with FAAAirport Division Manager on concepbidea
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
o Re-establish contact with Acaderrry
. Re-establish contact with FAA
. Establish coritact with King Courity
Key Timeline/Dates/Mil.estones:
o TBD
Key IssueslConcerns/Impediments:
• Political implications
. Local neighborhoods (Not In My Back Yard NIM81�
. Funding from FAA and State
• Permitfing%EPA
• Current access by road is congested
Notes•
When contact was made with Aubum Adventist Acaderriy leadership there was positive
reaction to the concepf. Academy was interested in a long-term lease versus an
outright sale of the properry.
Discussions wifh the FAA on the concept indicated that the FAA would be supportive of
"enhancements"of the Academy airport. The emphasis on enhancement instead of
development was important in the conversation. FAA statements inc/uded the FAA
would be su"ppoitive of fwo airports in Aubum, but then ada►rrantly stated th,e FAA would
not be supporfive of closing the current Aubum Airport.
Further disc.ussion included that a "possibility"th.at once the Academy airport was
satisfying the aviation needs and ifthe current Aubum Airport had substantially
decreased its impoifance in the afrtranspoitation system, the FAA mav.(emphasis
added) consider a proposal to transfer grant assurances to the Academy site.
fy�� ._`•'.,-! � •�� � . 1� �:: e ��' ��
���. !�� s�� (.� � ��'� S' �� ..�_��� �
� 'J �' - � ..� *�' � E� �J '1 -
� 7 � �� � i -� � � .
!P � � 4'� �� �
" 4 t ��s
F��^ I '�` ��� R ' +• ' q �� 1��$ � � � �r
i n t �, I � � Y���
[ { �
'�.� �
-� � 4 � , ' 1• '`�' r. 7`_ ��
,�1 � ,r liC9, � L � �
. .l;;���� �� ' r ' . �
t� � r ." , � +I�
'� . � .
, , � .
���1,� � �.r � [� , �"r' � �
° � +.� ,,, _
,� ;� . �. �
� +'�i J' ' � .
�. .. � �.� , � y -.�! • ' � k� � _. _ * '�
i�{.�� "g �' � j�r{" . � � �_� � � � �
.. •��;�,�7`w"� ', .� ��� t . �
���:1_ 4 - .1 Y .
�rF I ,�I
f +�` � � �� � �/�+ _ . • ijr�r s� � . � . � � . �
�l1 �j��• ,, v � � � � � �
� ! � i'_ �,�,��A! ^' ��� � 1• � a� � 4( . A � � • � � � �
'-` �,ii�`-� i ,
� � � � w .. . r� � � +�' � ,^w
� _.�' � � �'" �; �
.
�`=, � ' : i .�� �'• '; ,
�► - E. �?��� �'� ,�� ��'�f �.' ' �` 'Q� ;�,, I
� ,. ... �, '-� .a , � , -
�
- � � �1� � , ai � .1 ! i .{ ' '� A �r � •� � �
� ,�:� �i� � �. y + ' t� �:,+ �� IV � �����, ' .r i�
•� � _`1 G� f- � ��. •� � }.�, ti-. ,�r 1� ( � , 1
" • �d� � ' . � - X'.�r �� r . I. 1.'�
'� '
�r+3q �"�� ' 1 '� �i' �L" : � � -
• �� t lyil, , }�, �� ' "" � r � �
� � �t ` • ���C !,��.�� �' � s��' � •• � �' '�` �. �
� � } • �
„ .,r � � , �� -` 4 ' J,�'. � 1 � `��t ° >.
� � - �� �+„ �. r� -
s , � :. L "� �- `�� � `^4
� �j �p`� � �� ��r =� �,'. i `; � . - d'.J U ltU 4 A '�
. ,�� f � 1 • � r� . r M, ti • A� . �* "� '
� , �
'�i H� +{.� i , '� r '• J�I _ '' I� � �' � �
� � r• �• ! � y` �1� ♦ �w - _ ,
, • . � � �� ♦ • � � . .� �� � ����. t�, It i� � � �
ti• •r• �:� �� � y��l ' •' � • ,�� `
' � � 7 , r� '' � ��� � \
' . 3 ]W� � r ��'t� `� •� `� `�' , ��.r" ` � [ , ,'
� .���� �� ,r � �+ 1 � � " 1
/ • ♦ :� `� �� �/ ����. .� • ' M1r � r - �
L� � � , - , � , �
�.i � �� � . � r� r � . r - .� . f �° Y
�'�► ., �� � i�� ���r � � , -
' `� - � � r � � � .�-,� � �
` n � .p r-+ , , '� —;T. ti�• �� ��.� �. � � ' .
�� - `'s •i I ► '' 1 y a �•�t� .
`� ` � i �� ��� �►�� �4:, � ', . r -
- . ,
y/ ry1•�,,! _ y `
� �_. — _ _ _ . __ . lt. �_. �11L .-.. ._._ 1 . �_ .�t, —_ � � . --' -- . . . _—�l� - � ' .- .—�_��� _.___. .
��. - ' - � - �R i. � _ � ,.: " �� - - _- +' � . � _
��� � � � ��� � � � �� • � �
l
—++�, — � � = I � + j 4 • t t � ` � � � �
� r, �r~,. ..� .�.r. � .s•� , ��� �� �� �d'' i. ����'����`. '.�"" �i - et � ,
� ��.�. ,
� !� � Y ! r +� " � r' � � 1� �
� t ' _ r'' "� . ' - � - ,�`�',t . � `f•
- � '.' } — - � --
♦., �j
� . -Lt�;c�'�,,���� `' 4; � _ ,t. �.. [1 • \ �
�� ` ��y, �
�] � � w� , ' ,� � :'. 1e •
' - A -��A r � - 4.�Ir.. 'i ll�.'i ,� �,��.Y� � . � � � �._
a �1 ` � �
, ��+� � � i. + ��; ''� � . •I � � �' �� _-a. , �_ �(���ri M1�� �'� � ,^'� � � ��
/ ��', .� S.� � ` • i 1 � .�� '�'�.M�4�� �'�. � } � .. '�
�� • � �� '� _t � �+�• � � ���
�� � ry w�� � � .a�, . ` ���.�� '��1 �. � r
_��-.�, .. �" � � ��, .•i,j►t'� , . ...7�� -�' ��.�•�`r �,� - , '�. �- • �.
� r� ; r � _ ���� � �_ � � ��
� � � ? - .,.' ' � N •-- t � � --�„+ , � �`. '! .t� � �� .
i �� '�� � �. . , �' �' �� , .. R '� < . ♦ �� :
r r� ' � - i `. 1'1i '�
� ,
, � � �" ^ . , �� � � y � '
, �` ( . , r � . �
+ ' }, . . � ��, ''��r �� ,� ��' �� � � S. � �y� .
/ �
� .1 4.
II i
i I / �f � . _ . � .aar. ' i �,,. 1 4` r �: . . � � � i �
� + ,� t � • I�► � 1 � Y `�► �'�
�M . � �.� � . � � � � i. �.A� �f i ��i.
�.I� . � .� _ � ri�1T"� .�'.��M. �� �� � 4 � � _ � , • .� � Ir� -�
�1
� . , . � ` ����' _ , , � I e�4 . � ��
'( 1
�.. �, � ��, � '��'��� R1 : '� ��1�. ♦. i �~'�� k �
.� _ . • , . r . � . r — �.'. ' .� 'fi �'� � s ` /�' p
� 6 �
"'�__ ,.�; � - �`_ `� � �� � r �; ;r,�,� � � 3 r',.� " � ` .� �"�'�'�
, i ��� . , � �° � . �
, # �.
. - , + ��� � l� x�ut8�,, f� �,;` ��'�
�' - r '� �' 1���- . ,.; i ''t t� . �, ��':q�"�. "�'� �� w i ��� �
+ �y tlaf � � Y4 �. . �� . ,�� ' '� i� �
_�. � �.
.. � ; � r' r�.�.
.
F - r �4 � ��� +_ '� t�'�'t,'�'"�i► �'t '� , °�,• y�,;` � .'
� . a !� , . �_�3 �'!—�; ,�, ..
1. � +�� Ta� -. ' _ � �'• � ��- �I
� � �I� . •�. . ' 3 �s ` - _ _�� , N� �' 1���. � ~ �� I� a _ il y s - ' �1�
��� ii � _ � � ��i♦ . I H, ��1 •=F �t�Y��,( s� � ` �'.M • e ' . �s. � � a � � �� �i , % � � v
� �' 4il . 1� .
� 4 �] � (.�, • , - a1W� �i {`. �ll
y � .l �!+ \ _ �n• f 3 - fl � .,ll, 1 i� �Y.1 l�YC �� ��' � 1y{���, 1��" /�� r •�'��.
'' . #� � r �"1'�1� I ' �:�' /�' ��� • "t, � l • *� �
. ���- - ��� � � * � � �• � �r�
I{ �. � r� � � � � ` � 5
. r �
-_ - .. .�'1� ' e � :`� .�I,�� ' - : #>�?. .� 1 � �. ,� � � �"� A!A w�-�7''�� f�r �� . 1� ' � i� .R - � ��I
� 1� f ��� � ! (`c �.,,�.._ - , _� : M�+ � � j. '1� . - '� .� - �li.l.��� •�� t S - _.* ; � �
— - � ; �� I l} � � ,A� ��� �� � �ri .� -� „ , _ ; � �' , . �r �� ; �,. . , � . ��� i
, � � � � ,
� � r F , ' �, ` � -i, �"
_ � ,1 I.I. r � •i, , I � " ,� � �. • � � � ,� � • . r,I1 �� � �
1�; � � �r�i '�'+.� + .r . t � �� �� � ., _
� � �•. � a � � . . s.
; .. .. � �- . � � � � j�,� r . �, ,G_. rJ:, � i
,�
T ' ,, .k ��• '� � • ' i� / � ' . 1'si� - r,l - .t• •► . •t, . ' q ` .i UJ �i � Z � 41
- � 1' j" 1 �' � -"�i i 1 . . , .� � '_ � � .�. !h
'; ,_ , � E. l , r ��� �l� .; b. ,� ,� , � �!`� '� ,Y � �, � , �� E� � ; . �.�' ��� • ��;
� ' � " � • r �
., . �
; . �' ,_ ��: .s� ... . .. .. . a . � - � . .� �, . � . , ��..� 1
�a :: n a
r � � �
. r � � � .r � i 'J . �T1 K.�r` � '�� � k � ,
_ i . •
,
�f1r�r
� �'� ��� �,�, �' (� �, �� � ( ' �: „ ,:,� `� � ,
� _. ._ � - e� A ' _ 1 � }_ , , '� . +� - � � `,*� � �
l� S - � _ � -�+ �.V�. ,{�� � � "t(+�, �� �u, i .. ��l - -a
,� � � , �'^ � • � ` � � �' ��� �
' �'__ _ . __ ' _ _ . . . _ � � � t - �� _ r _ r - �4 , t _
� _ . . , • . T�: ��_ ��"--� r['��i . _ . . _
x
AuBu�v
� WASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT—OCTOBER 2H-29, 201 O
Planning & Development Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Auburn Way South Redevelopment
Status: ❑ Complete ❑ In Progress � Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
C �
>,�f_ � �f{i '�! ► �,'; 1' 1 ..�a� �-;�r i� " �
� �i��."tr—r1 L.r'r rR.'�� S' f.:� :�a. ..
�-.�:�i"�� . �_-''
, ,_ �...,..,., ,�;;u ...�r�r,y --
�"'- ��-�SR 1 S � �
� - -
�,._ ,�y.. �-q�,; I :w�IM..�. �t_,r y �a_�, `,F.••., i,.
�.K^�I '�1(1r4��� t� � �K-� _ f�..a .
� �� r. � t = �t" g. � '�
�S': -�,��iiTA` � • ��.- ;=; e j�
� .....^ �: � .� y� I
+C:�s.�.�� � ��'�`,�,.
��. �y'►+
r � �{��' �,y<` � -'i.��' � �by_
-_,;-iLl..- �F �.. � � ' .J. I
i �F � ' PM y f '� �� .. A'- _
�y: y, �..-.S'-.. � q 5a..'�`� �
�� . -< ��,._., . .�. �,��
. � '�r F�
li u. _ j-�:. ��,_ . . �
� ' ♦4 ^
� _ �-..._ 4. y �, .
Jy� �}
�r,ret. Yr 4..): �' �_ }J�..�i
_ -��:��- -� �," '�
�,':,_ ,,,�--t,_ Z ``,� t
•�'b' �s , ';��� —=--
,
_ _ � - . . . �
� - -f '�f' ��t �y,�
..�- � ` `
r y
x ' ;�.�' _�"7 y � �
----..
. ` .
�
� Auburn Way South Redevelopment Area
Work Completed to Date:
• City Council approval of Resolution No. 3944 in November 2005 approving the City
of Auburn Economic Development Strategies – included Golden Triangle Strategy
Area
• Significant planning and development efforts for Les Gove Community Campus -
— New Gymnasium (under construction), Discovery Playground and current
� : Community Center planning
• King County Library — Auburn Branch expansion development
• Master planning code development initiated in Summer 2010 — potential
redevelopment tool
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
• Gain greater understanding of potential expansion and development plans for Grace
Community Church, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and other key parties to inform future
redevelopment planning
. Develop strategic redevelopment plan for Auburn Way South — options include sub
area plan, targeted development plan
• Coordinate with property owners, businesses and residents to develop current
understanding of key issues, concerns and opportunities
. Develop detailed understanding of macro and micro economic market forces
affecting redevelopment opportunities
• Prepare updates to Comprehensive Plan and development regulations
. Investigate potential use of Planned Action SEPA for redevelopment area to
facilitate expeditious development
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
• Mid-2011 — End of 2012 — Preparatory work for Comprehensive Plan update
Key Issues/Concerns/Impediments:
. Need to establish clear redevelopment boundaries and redevelopment goals
. Need to balance growing institutional uses (i.e. Les Gove Community Campus,
Grace Community Church) with private sector commercial uses — how can these
uses mutually support and benefit each other?
• Potential incorporation of Golden Triangle Strategy Area into corridor redevelopment
planning
. WSDOT access control for SR-164 and current and future corridor traffic impacts
• Types of development to be encouraged and potential incentives for development of
these uses and transition of non-compatible land uses to preferred land uses
• Close proximity of existing residential neighborhoods and associated buffering
needs
. Types of development incentives to be offered by City — primarily non-financial — and
packaging and presentation of these incentives to the marketplace
Notes:
• Presently, Auburn Way South is heavily developed with automobile oriented/low
intensity commercial retail uses. Although there is significant traffic volumes along
Auburn Way South, existing and future access controls may make retail activities
along this corridor increasingly challenging without a plan to develop cross
connections between properties
��\
\`
� �
\
�� ����````���``\` eURNwqYSOU H
, ����` ���`\ T
�� - �
� �
� �� ������
� �� ' �� AMO QIBIO LEFf Nl91 UNE POCI�T oosr�o eue arov ro
��` �� r�r�x
� ��
����� ���� MUCKLESHOOT
��` . ��
PLAZA SE
� ��
�� �
� ��
�� �
�
V �� . �� �
� �� ����� ����� � ..//����� �
i `���� �� � q�/@
'� � � � ��R ��s,���,�m��
,; � , ,,_ , ; ; �,, NWqy u,�o,�o,��a
�,�.�W,� � , � ` '�� �SOI/T
- iau�o u/o m�rFlc a�nmFx -� ._-\. //� ��.� � ��` ��` -_.�/
."�'��� :,.. ... � ��� ��1� ���� ^ ���� � .
•• �� ����' ., , ����.o����n� CIZ[�SH�OT , �� � ��
�� . \ ., WIElMOCAEMOQRRANCE , . \ �` � ���\
��� " ,, ����" _ PLAZAS� ��� „� �
�� :,, ��� ..� . cowemucr eu. . . �� �. .....
. - �� �� ` � wuaur � ��� � .
i� :. �� ooarn/o eus mor m � �._, �\
� , rn
� � " �� . , �, �� � � �.
�
, `•�� ���� . � RIVERWALK � �� 0
, , � , , .
q . .�\ , ��` • : . DR_ _ �,.a�M��
IVE SE
. /. ��` ��` . ACCEba To RBWN. �!'!�
VeVR�wqVso ���� ; � �� , <' � 14` / . �r
� , � _
,� ��
;: .
, UTN , . .. '���\`` '���i�����l�_
\ AC�F,.RES,PM:IED TO
`��` �` ` � �� XIOHT IN RIOH�OUT
� � � �� .. -. . . � �.
� ��` . . . �,�
\
�
�\
� 4fry �� �� ,_ m AUgU
� �� ��� �- I,�
l � _R
_
� - _ N ^
) . �, _
WrERlEGIqMW�EME➢AMD �^ � � � . . ,.. , � ``` �```\`..,.�,_ \,_'-�'1/�I�SO�T�
RECIUNMEI�UTOACCOWOD�TEWM. y � � l
NRN IAME!OM�YfB AXD IiqM NRN /r � �� . �� � •. �� .
VOCI�fONRN9lW�W( ,� � •, '�'. � `�: .
. �_. ��` � . - _ _
: -.,. .. �� '� � ,,,i .. �� � ''�'.,�
RNERWALK �� `� �
__- -- � . — _.
:..., ����� _ { �� _
DRIVE SE �� � ��� ::.
��
- -- °�ruu�our°� coHamuc,nue�n w�oec�rE ��� `'�-
IM/WD NID iRl1FFiC BMRER
� IEFT �CCESbTOREYNM WM __.__ "
� PAWOIOOM�OEORNEYIAY
I
�=�- ��� SR-164 AUBURN WAY SOUTH �
_ �. AUBUI\1 V CONCEPNAL COfi�OR MPROVEMEM PLAN PA(�
r�iumrmrimsEew�.ms�se lOF2
- WASMWGTON
coNwuo�rewm�ew DOGWOOD ST SE
� arov r�or arc u�o ncceae neamic�o m - ---- -- --
� conaraucr eus Tuw�wr. xqkr w w�wr art � ,
�` �""°°'°°� ` FIR ST SE
� ', �`.-,;, . . rov�nw�.+*nw AUBURN WAY SOUTH �TMawsaror ro
���
.,(; - _ � .�... . ,,, - ---i---- � �r� euruho
- �� . �
., ;--'� . - -__- �� __� � ,. ,. .. � �
t I
'`,� - _ � ' , . ' rroxocK ven caosaro ro
� _ ��� .•. •�-=_� /�'I j41py ;� .. . — WlgO6C�PEBLANED. ACfIVATFDFWIIEMOBFAGONl. CWEDGEATNTFABECTqN ,
��
` �_ � tv� ___ �
� . . _
,
� r __ � • � '�" _
-_ �� ��11 �
_T �
� �� �� � __ I�
, . _ _ _ ....., ,
... .c�� ... ' � ��4����
'"' __
-, i � � r �� . -- —
� � ��� �
„ ' � � �� � �� � � • -- ;
AVB�RN ; iuN � - - ___--r__ -- -= -- -- ------- -- '.
/ - ' , --�-
_ _ yyq�, � , �R _ Q -- ___ - - . .
S - , . . , -_-_____ _— _ _
�
►►�p� �
-_ _ . ,
o�rH , - . . , . - ., .,..,. : . . ---_----- �=..
.
� - ----
- ; -------------•--
�„�.W,I -
NRNOUf I U-TURN 1AME _.
� El08fMaB1188iOP N — _ -
DOGWOOD ST SE "E""" ELM ST SE owv�w�rneam�Euro msr�oeusaror ro
_____ - ——_-_— IIIfi11T N NAI(f OV�. EIlYlA7ED
° �aB�s�.v HEM�OCK � �� ; %� I
a �� ST SE � �� ' �
� ! // �
woex Noan�soe or� �s iu
cOxernucr Bua � // '. COHaraucr eEcoNo we{'r�ouNo i I
NRNWTIU-NRNUNE. I � � T��IlI1NE5 - � �
— AUBURN WAY SOUTH ` __ �
--- 'lllll —
. . . ., - -
AUBURN WAY SOUTH
: L , � � , �,� _ �
- - . .
-J ------------ -
. . • . .. ..
:_, �n _ _ _-_--------------- _ _ ------==
#
AuBu�v
� WASHINGTON
� AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT
Parks, Arts 8� Recreation Department
Briefing Update for 2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Public Art & Cultural Arts
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: � Yes ❑ No
� �'� � � L� ��.� ;- ,�, ,_,�
',„�,,
. �_r- - ., .; - ��� ��
•�; -
;' ��`
..;� .�� �'' ��� I �.., `: �•': ' .
�`' 3 /� i , i' — �.�
,4` e �. t ,-� - �'�,2 �
f l a�. . .,. �--"l ... �� ��I y`;'�*^.�. _�'11� � 1
�
Supporting Documents Attached: � Yes ❑ No
• Ordinance #6243 (Privately Developed Public Artwork)
• 2010 Arts Commission presentation to Planning & Community Development
Committee Presentation
Work Completed to Date:
• Performing ARs
• Expanded BRAVO Season from 4 shows in 2010 to 29 shows for 2010-2011 Season by
combining performances at Auburn Ave. Theater and the Performing Arts Ctr. Continue
goal of expanding audience base while keeping existing supporters
• Promote and program Auburn Avenue Theater, a 250 Seat venue with 88 new theater
chairs in the center section and a new screen and video/cable/projection capabilities
• Variety of regular programming, addition of Auburn Community Players
• Marketing for rental space for performances, meetings & events
• Visual Art
• Two galleries (City Hall and Senior Activity Center) –feature local and regional artists
and change monthly. 18 exhibits coordinated in 2010.
• Coordinated 2nd ArtRageous event –fine-art festival focused on diversity of inedium,
diversity of age appropriate activities, hands-on experiences, and involvement of local
organizations.
�
• Public Art
• Auburn's Public Art Program is supported through a 1% for art ordinance
(Resolution #4546 revised in Jan. 2010).
• The City passed the Privately Developed Public Artwork Ordinance in 2009 (Ordinance
No. 6243). This ordinance encourages private devetopment, especially Downtown, to
include art for public enjoyment with the understanding that in doing so, they are
contributing to the vitality of the City.
• Current collection of 23 artworks, most of which are in the Parks throughout Auburn.
• 3 new public art projects in the works —Teen Center/Gymnasium, Community Center, &
City Hall Plaza Redesign (only the Community Center project is funded under the 1% for
art ordinance, the others are funded using construction credits to incorporate art as part
of an element that was already funded — i.e. —functional lighting)
• Completed three murals in 2010 —Auburn Ave Theater mural completed at Clean
Sweep, Art Works murals completed for Les Gove Community Campus, and downtown
construction fencing murals completed as project during ArtRageous.
• Community Support
• Work with local arts organizations to support their efforts including: Auburn Symphony
Orchestra; White River Valley Museum — Small Works/Big Presents Art Show; Auburn
Good OI' Days — entertainment and art show (student & adults); Uniquely Auburn;
Auburn Valley Creative Arts, and others.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
Key Issues/Concerns/lmpediments:
• General: Continue to look for outside funds to support arts programming efforts; In
partnership with Planning Department investigate arts & culture district overlay for
downtown
• Performing Arts: Work to expand audience base, bring diverse and interesting
performances to Auburn and provide performing arts for all ages.
• Public Art: Continue to refine 1% for Art ordinance, work on plan for downtown art, and
encourage art as part of private developments.
• Visual Art: Continue to create gallery experience for local artists, explore additional
opportunities to showcase local artwork in Auburn, continue to work on event-based
visual arts such as ArtRageous and Downtown Art Walk to increase exposure for area
artists.
• Art Education: Continue discussions with Auburn School District, GRCC, Auburn Valley
Creative Arts and others to provide art programs, continue link from artists to Recreation
staff to schedule art classes, and continue to seek connections with BRAVO series
performers to offer unique experience for Auburn students and residents.
Notes:
� ORDINANCE NO. 6 2 4 3
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, CREATING A NEW
CHAPTER 2.85 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING
TO PUBLIC ART
WHEREAS, with reference to Chapter 18.29 of the Auburn City Code (ACC), the
DUC, Downtown Urban Center District, Subsection 18.29.040 (H), the City Code states
as follows:
"Any form of painting, mural, mosaic, sculpture, or other work of art,
so long as it can be appraised as a work of art and its value as such is
documented, displayed on the exterior of a building, at or near the
pedestrian entrance, or in a public plaza, and visible to users of the public
right of way at all times."
WHEREAS, with reference to Chapter 18.28 ACC, the C-2, Central Business
District, Subsection 18.28.050.F.3.e states as follows:
� "If a building has more than two street frontages then at least two of
the frontages shall comply with subsections (F)(3)(b) and (F)(3)(g) and
contain pedestrian amenities between the building and the right of way.
Any remaining frontages shall either have pedestrian amenities, windows,
murals, flat surtaced art work or other similar architectural features that
would avoid large blank walis."
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to encourage privately sponsored art
throughout the City, especially in the Downtown Urban Center, and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to promote and maintain a high level of
aesthetics in all artworks, both publicly sponsored and privately sponsored, within the
City, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 2.84 ACC, the City of Auburn Arts Commission,
appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council, is empowered to initiate,
sponsor and conduct programs calculated to further public awareness of and interest in
�
the visual, cultural, and performing arts, and in this regard, has expertise and specific
knowledge regarding artworks that are already in place in Auburn, and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Arts Commission wishes to offer non-binding
advice to private parties who are proposing to display artwork within the City in order to
help ensure that artworks are appropriate and of high quality, and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Arts Commission is the recognized advisory body
to the City Council and to the Mayor regarding all City sponsored artwork and also
acceptance by the City of artwork gifts, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Department is also responsible for enforcing the
requirements the City's Sign code, which could implicate private artworks and wall
murals, and
WHEREAS, the City Planning Department is also responsible for abating public
nuisances, which could also implicate private artworks and wall murals if not
maintained.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows:
Section 1. CREATION OF NEW CHAPTER TO CITY CODE. That a new
Chapter 2.85 of the Auburn City Code - regarding Public Art, be, and the same is
hereby created to read as follows:
Chapter 2.85
Public Art
Sections:
2.85.010 Intent and purpose.
2.85.020 Administrative Provisions.
2.85.030 Compliance with other codes and laws.
2.85.010 Intent and purpose.
� The
A. The overall purpose of this Chapter is to enhance and maintain the
aesthetic character, to promote the public health, safety and general welfare, and to
increase the effectiveness of visual communication in the city.
B. This Chapter is intended to promote a positive visual display of
businesses and structures within the City so as to avoid visual clutter that may
adversely impact traffic and pedestrian safety, or be adverse to property values,
business opportunities and the city's overall appearance, and to prevent and abate
public nuisances.
C. This Chapter is also intended to establish a mechanism for giving
suggestions and advice from City Planning staff and the City's Arts Commission to
private parties, regarding the construction, location, use and maintenance of all privately
sponsored art that is visible from the public right of way.
D. This Chapter is also intended to ensure compliance with ACC 18.56,
Signs, ACC 18.29, DUC, Downtown Urban Center District, and ACC 18.28, G2, Central
Business District, without unduly burdening commercial speech.
2.85.020 Administrative Provisions.
A. All persons proposing to display artwork, especially wall murals, that will
be visible from the public right of way, are requested and encouraged to contact the City
Planning Department, and requested to provide the department with a high quality
representation of the artwork. The Planning Department shall determine whether the
� proposed artwork constitutes a sign as defined in ACC 18.56, in which case, the
permitting provisions of ACC 18.56 shall apply. If the Planning Department determines
that the proposed artwork does not constitute a sign as defined in ACC 18.56, then the
Planning Department staff shall promote and encourage following the provisions of this
Chapter as follows:
1. The proponent is encouraged to consult with the City Cultural Arts
Department and the City of Auburn Arts Commission to ensure that its proposed artwork
will not pose problems in being integrated into the artistic fabric of Auburn.
2. The proponent is encouraged to take steps to provide for on-going
maintenance of the artwork, to avoid degradation, and to avoid the artwork from falling
into a state of dilapidation and/or becoming a public nuisance.
3. The proponent is encouraged to take steps to provide that any
subsequent modification to the artwork is addressed, to ensure continued compliance
with the City Sign Code, and to promote continued appropriate aesthetics.
B. All persons wishing to make a gift of artwork to the City shall consult with
the City Cultural Arts Department and the City of Auburn Arts Commission to seek the
City's acceptance of it. The City of Auburn Arts Commission will advise the City Council
on whether the gift is appropriate for the City to own and whether there should be any
conditions or requirements applied to such artwork, such as location and maintenance
of the artwork, if it is approved for acceptance. The final decision on such
recommendations shali be by the City Council.
2.85.030 Compliance with other codes and laws.
�
Nothing in this Chapter authorizes the installation, establishment or use of a sign,
mural or artwork that is in violation of City Codes, or state or federal law.
Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this
ordinance.
Section 3. Severabilitv. If any portion of this Ordinance or its application to any
person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the Ordinance or the
application of the provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected.
Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five
(5) days from and after its passage, approval and publication, as provided by law.
INTRODUCED:
PASSED:
APPROVED:
ATTEST:
PETER B. LEWIS
MAYOR
Danielle E. Daskam,
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Daniel B. Heid,
City Attorney
PUBLISHED:
- � . �.. . � '"' '-' ��
�"'} 5 �
U'
'�.i
���
.;�'�. j i', -
�� �
� 'I�
� ,
Auburn Arts Commission-October 2010
Meeting with Planning&Community Development Cmte.
„_. I i i
� ��;c.
- � �� F �l Y �� � � : �,
� ' ^ �: i � r4. ?:
.. � ' �.! ��}.
- -_ ,. :;� _.
,,� t. _
i -- - ---- ..
•
Auburn Arts Commission
A 12 member advisory board that works closely with staff[o support and
advance arts in Auburn.The Commission fosters the growth of the arts in
Auburn through the presentation of various arts programs,community
initiatives and program partnerships.Through a shared vision,leadership
and service,the Auburn Arts Commission's goal is to integrate the arts into
all aspects of community life.
Performing Arts
Visual Arts
Public Art
Arts Education
Advocacy and support for local artists and arts organizations
Special Projects&Events
Working cross department
��
. ._ ��!�'�e Performing Arts
The BRAVO Series presents a
variety of music,dance and
theater touring groups from all
`� � ���= around the globe.
z �
�� � 1 �
�{' •Expanded seasonfor2010-
� 2071 (4 shows to 29 shows)
•Marketing all performances
• � together-bothatehe Auburn
�I�. Ave.Theaterandthe
Performing ArtsCenter
�.� •Goal of expanding audience
V � base while keeping existing
��
� � �, supporters
\
Performing Arts - Auburn Ave. Theater
250 Seat Venue
Variety of programming
� • ( ' f
•LiveattheAve qppLyR�N� ' ' a
•Comedy at the Ave APR��&MAyN oM���;;Mfq E
•Avenue Kids eor�aMi��E'��
•Youth Theater Camp �uNEn"<NiieRs
•Auburn Community Players-new
88 oew chairs in center sedion ','
��� �,,
New screen and video capabilities 'y�,:x
�.
Rental space for performances, � n
meetings,and events +^
r -
��
�
. : �.,, Public Art
� � Auburn'sPublicArt
�
Programissupported
� � shroughal%forart
ordinance.
.
__ � �,s��� ��, Current colledion of
"��x � 23 artworks,most of
which are in the Parks
� ^�'' throughoutAuburn.
a�
_, �..
_. 3 new public art
,�y � - �arojeds in the works
f��_
�
� _ �_ _,� '
.
Public Art 2010 Projects
Bruce Myers Virginia Paquette Sheila Klein
Activity Center/Gymnasium Community Center City Hall Plaza
Climbing Wall Gate Artwork Redesign
Er.try way and Desk Lighting Features
_i i, .
.J i .
�
"" �'-.; ' <`' �4
� - ' ���� �:::
� __" ��-_'— , ,r ""�"'�d�
�. � � �;,. F -z� ya�
k T ��
I ��� a iG �_� .
At, _
�'4} —� � (
a � � .
.. �..� � .,� .. . . .
:i , r �I� . .,
� � . � ii .� r' .i.
� ��_..� .r--..__ .,', �. . � _ . _ .
�fi
•
Mural Projects
Green Apple Graphics Green Apple Grephics
Clean Sweep Project Downtown Artwork
Auburru Ave. Tt�eater N��ural ArtRageous project
� �ti=' �1,1,,,�
0 9, �,. ��������
�> -- Urban Art Works
���'� Mural for
nfn
i4' '� i Les Gove Activity ^ �
� � CentedGymnasium �i �(
� Construction �r,� ;��?! ���
. ..
Fenc�ng �'.n'7"-►.i.��.•'-;,
��� . �
�„` ```, ,
� � � ,_ �
.,�;,;;�:, Visual Art - Galleries
, � Two galleries
" \� (City Hall and Senior
- i Activity Center)
- " feature local and
�� — r Y regional artists and
■� � � ���IY IId
� � ; � � - change monthly.
' �� � Featured 18 exhibits
"�'�'` in 2010.
� �" All artists are invited
to apply and exhibits
r• � � are selected by a
e � � " '' panel.
E`• ` , a �
, i
�
�- --��� _� ArtRageous
� . „ S� ��� � �
��� � .
► ( � ^ Fine Arts focus
a .
Diversity of inedium
`U- ' Diversity of age appropriate adivities
_`~�'-� _ , Hands-on experiences
- `- . Involvelocalorganizations
' ♦-------' ,���� Highlightenvironmentalism
� � ,
`�� rCULTURE
yy�� i �
�i„x`*. ��� '� SITFSPECIFIC CULTURE
.. ��' s ��l/ l/
Zc
V.
.y���� ^`.I���N �ItiI 1-nIR
�}y NUl�l�lrv
r I
i.__.
�
Visual Art - community support
� �
- �g �esen s �,
R�� G�� OL� �4�
Student Art Competition
�
Support of Community Arts
\ �� i �+ irn
�
, � �, iii � ► ri � �_ri �,�
� � - �
1r� - r �� • , Ir� i
,,�,, ��� A�� Goo� pL, ��
WhiteRiver ������ "
ValleyMuseum
Funders for Art Programs
�IUBUItIV b'VASHINGTC"� 5—A-e
��„l�,U���,�,M,,,;,�,,, � ARTS COMMISSION
� � , ..
` • �� CULTURE
C U LT U R E SITE-SPECIFIC
KINB CO�MTY LOOOINO 7�%
Future Goals
PERFORMING ARTS—Work to expand audience base,bring diverse and interesting
performances to Auburn and provide performing arts(or all ages.
PUBLIC ART—Continue to refine 1%for Art ordinance,work on draft of art project
development plan,work on plan for downtown art.
VISUAL ART—Continue to create gallery experience for local artists,explore
additional opportunities to showcase local aKwork in Auburn,continue to work on
event-based visual artz such as Downtown Art Walk to increase ezposure for area
artl5t5.
ART EDUCATION—Continue discussions with Auburn School District,GRCC and
Auburn Valley Creative Arts to provide art programs,continue link from artists to
Rxreation staff to schedule art classes,and continue to seek connections with BRAVO
series performers to oHer unique experience for Auburn students and residents.
�
CfITOF -*.�`* •
Vi+ASHINGTON
AUBURN CITY COUNCIL VISION 2030 RETREAT-OCTOBER 28-29, 2O1 O
Planning & Development Department
Briefing Update:for`2016 Vision Goals
Vision 2016 Goal: Community Oufreach
Status: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further Direction
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporting Documents Attached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
A number of new community outreach efforts have begun in recent years. The
establishment of 4he Community Services division of the Administrakion department has
served to enhance and coordinate the various outreach in city departments.
The Community Services guide identifies the services that are available wi4hin Autiurn
and the surrounding region. The guide is a comprehensive work that includes schools,
churches, non-profits, government and quasi-govemment resourc.es. It is available in
multiple languages and has come to be in demand by a variety of users throughout the
city:
Neighborhood, Safety and Blockwatch meetings serve as the main point of contact for
community outreach and identification of issues. These settings provide the forum for
citizens to express thei� individual concerns while giving the City an opportunity to
respond with resources.
The Community Services division has combined the efforts of human services, housing
efforts, economic development, diversity and neighborhood programs to provide a
coordinated cesponse to the issues that face Auburn. It has served to become a focal
point for residenfs in need of access and Pnformafion. The division works closely with
the Planning and Building department on issues oficommunity development and code
enforcement.
Efforts between Poliee, Utilities, Parks and other key departments have been
intentionally engaged in conversation related to strategic outreach in the city with a
focus on providing consistency in communication with residenfs.
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
Key Issues/Concerns/lmpediments:
Notes:
� CII'YOF *�`* +
WASHINGTON
AuBURN Cirr CouNci�VisioN 2030 RerREar—OGTOBER 28-29, 2010
Human Resources, Risk and Property Management
_ Briefing Update for 2016 Vision_Goals
Vision. 2016 Goal: To have the base operation to assume animal services
responsibilities at the end of the Interlocal Agreement- December 31, 2012
Stafus: ❑ Complete � In Progress ❑ Pending further DirecEion
Visual Support: ❑ Yes � No
Supporting Documents Atfached: ❑ Yes � No
Work Completed to Date:
• Signed an ILA with King County to provide intenm animal services and time for
the City to develop the Ci.ty of Auburn Animal Services Program (control,
licensing, sheltering)
e Hired a temporary Animal Services Coordinator
• Began discussions with local veterinarian group
Work Remaining to Be Completed:
liientify and resolve animal services issues`
a Sheltering - animal care prbgrams, facility
e Staffing/Organizational needs — employees, volunteers,
e Types of programs — acloption, rescue groups, spay/neuter, education
o Licensing — internal/outsource (contracted)
Key Timeline/Dates/Milestones:
Key Issues/Concerns%Impediments:
• Finding a facility/organization capable of ineeting City's sheltering needs
Notes:
Committee of the Whole
Transportation Program Planning
Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Comp Plan):
• Long Term Planning Document, 2030 Horizon Year
• Based on Land-use and population goals
• Utilizes Traffic Demand Model to identify LOS deficiencies and capacity
projects
� 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP):
• Short Term Planning Document, 2016 Horizon Year
• Projects taken from Comp Plan and other's based on current
operational, safety, mobility or preservation needs.
• Most transportation grants require projects to be listed in the TIP for
eligibility.
�� Both documents are planning tools required to be updated annually
per Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) :
.
Art� �t�
�
� �^�rA S H l y(; f C�N ,
Arterial Corridors & LOS
� / P.rterial Corridor LOS Standards
� 1 � M C What is LOS? Posted
- � p "• � ( r ��' � Speed MPH � � 35 30
r -- i Current city policy for the LOS AverageTravelSpeeds
,1`� � Arterial LOS Standard is ^ '4Z >35 >� >ZS
. �...�...._�_
-. ' �,^. � r""� B >3442 >28-35 >2430 >19-25
� J ' � � the Average Travel Speed � >2�-34 >ZZ-Z$ >l8-ZQ >13-19
~� .� D >21-27 >17-22 >14-18 >9-13
I l
, � p �ti� y � � over a defined corridor . E >l�Z, >,3-„ >,o-1, >,-9
• 5 r� .�� ~ F �16 �13 �10 �7
� �' �^ _ �;,, �
= r ^ ` --_,--., i
� j I
�. _,�-;�,_
� � -R— ' �., �Y ' Group A . 6-Year TIP
� .
,
, � i..�! ,. � �� -
, . � � �- e• _�
i '"'• -" �.
- i \ ; " Group C � Regional
, .,E
� �.-'�----- ..._� a
..� ,:.._ _.� _'
_, � � 4 .._ m A< < <
s „ o .
. ,. w „ � ,
_��; -� � Quest�ons?
, . E �
. . "-1.J . . _ t� . - _—
�
. v a��
-- � � �- m - t
. , �
_� s _ E
__ __ _ - __ - t�— - .
,�..�M„e...�.,. � .-
Q .�,��_.� ' —
�►ton+aw a.cti«o y�.d,W �"-=
��• ❑ CNy LYNb — �
Flpv�SJ I #
�.,...rr_ .__ _.. �
l'ITY' (7F �
- A� BU�r
� �ti'AIHINGI'C�N Z
2011-2016 Transportation Improvement Program
� � Cit of Aubum 1011 Z016 . - ....' `. .. .".' . ..�........
Y .u.;;=:,. �.
T�ansportatlon Iraprovernenl Program
i _ _ `-- - .. � .. . .::: � _ .
,...,� � � L�
� � � � - _
_--. �. .}.� t _ _.
l � . �J1 I . . :� a_ ,a v
9 fl I 1-�.��. I l _ - -
r�E4!� . •' , �,;.,,�. t° � — ....._ ^ - _
� �.. , i
` � ir :
. ' _ IT
�, :t:�.l�� : , ,- -
��V..,!— 1— —.�= � i � � �� ��
. - i �� ' - _
� �-
�
R , I
_ �y , .. . ?�e , .��a ,.a ,.<..m ,,.
�� `'�' :�: � "' a , �k s - ,�.� �� -
� . _ � � �� .�_� � - —
�
; = � ,- � ,� _
�---;-, i. �, : � � ; , � ::
'U _t i� � ��� ,l� � �,=p" ,,.,.. ,. , _
I , � �r � _ ���'• �� . '
_ �� � , � _ m .,
d , -
� '��. ��: .,, . .o.. . „m .,.� ..m .:.
, - o -?t° � ,
' __ ' � i
u .� ,
'+' i — .�. �� - -
r
ti N I
..�� _- .i0... _i �i.: .;ur _ . _ _
. : _�. .. . ' _
�„i . �i t -. . d-i . rt — _ — —�: _
9 �
/ • -
, , , -�
• Y �•.. p , ,..� ::
I ' ,e�' � �'-
ti� . �m ,.aR ,ro,� �
� ., `� r-�.�' . .+ .. ` � _..,..�.. ... _ .a _ _ � ..�
'� .,... ......... .. . �-
1 "�'s -
, 5� �,`', lif i � 4'` - -
�
_.
� � .
< < --- - ',
_..-�
, �� �. --� ` -
P� . .. . ' . .. ....
�.�. . .. . `'. ���
v� ..r�
.� ^�{��i. . .�{• . ..... . .. «. . .�.,........�. , �, nm.�
:�'t
L _�`_ .. -
( �--�--� —��-- '� �, �; crrr� ��F . �:T .
` AU �v�
' wns H i N cr�c��v 3
Current Project Updates
� M St Grade Separation (TIP-5) : This project will grade
separate M Street SE from the Burlington northern Santa Fe Stampede
Pass rail line between 3rd Street SE and 6th Street SE.
❑ Funding Status:
� $22.6M Total Project Cost
� Current funding short fall of $6.8 Million.
Secured Funding includes $2.6M BNSF/Ports, $1M Federal, $6M FMSIB
(State), $0.2M King County, and $6M City REET & TIF funds.
� Applied for $6.8M PWTF loan as a fall back position. Staff is continuing to seek
grant and federal appropriation opportunities to reduce the PWTF loan
commitment.
�� FMSIB funding requires that construction be under by the end of 2011 .
❑ Project Status:
� Completed 75% Design.
� ROW acquisition in process.
� Construction expected to begin late 2011 depending on funding.
.
CITY clF � •
�UBt.� RN
� WASHINGIC)N 4
Current Project Updates (cont.)
� � A -B Corridor Phase 1 (TIP-� ) : This project will complete the
design and construction of the A Street/B St NW connection between 3rd
Street NW and 14th Street NW including a new signal at 3rd St NW.
o Funding Status:
$12.2M Total Project Cost
. Current Funding Shortfall is $2.825M.
� Secured funding includes $6.581 M Federal, $1 .606M Developer Contributions,
and $1 .202 in City 102, REET and TIF funds.
� Staff is continuing to seek grant and federal appropriation opportunities
o Project Status:
p Completed 90% design.
s ROW acquisition is in process.
� Environmental permitting is in process.
Construction is expected to begin in summer 2011 depending on funding.
.
*
Av� �
��
WAS H I N G"i`(�N 5
Current Project Updates (cont.)
� S Division St Promenade (TIP-52): This project will develop
a comprehensive promenade along S Division Street between Main
Street and 3rd Street SE/SW. Improvements includes new water, sanitary
sewer, and storm drainage utilities as well as wide sidewalks, new
pavement, street lighting, street furniture and new traffic signal at Main St.
❑ Funding Status:
$8M Total Project Cost
�� Project is fully funded by $5M in State Local Revitalization Financing and a $3M
Economic Development Administration (Federal) Grant.
u Project Status:
- Design is about 60% complete.
�� Environmental approvals are completed.
i Construction is anticipated to begin Spring of 2011
.
CITY t�1F ' .
��..J il V 1 u \
4ti'AS H I NG I`ON ��
Current Project Updates (cont.)
� � AMTRAK Stop in Auburn (TIP-A) : Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is planning an Amtrak "Service
Development Plan". The plan will evaluate existing and future service
plans along the Seattle-Portland intercity Amtrak passenger rail corridor.
The City of Auburn is actively advocating for WSDOT to include service to
Auburn's Transit Center in the studies focus.
❑ Funding Status:
�« WSDOT has submitted a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) grant request to
fund the study. FRA funding decision is pending.
o Study Status:
� Pending Funding.
CITY t�F + • •
AU �t��
� b1�'ASHINGfC�N �
Future Projects Update
• SR-1641mprovements:
� Proiect Info: Route Development Plan was completed by WSDOT. Improvements
identified include widening, pedestrian and intersection improvements from 6th St
Se to Southern City limits. No funding is in place for these improvements.
� I St NE Corridor (TIP-4):
� Proiect lnfo: Project will construct the I St NE extension between 40th St NE and S
277tn St. This project is driven by development of adjacent properties.
� Grade Separated Crossing at BNSF Railyard (Tip-12):
� Proiect Info: This project is intended to provide mitigation for potential expansion
of operations at the BNSF railyard. Improvements inc►ude a grade separated
crossing at either 6'h St SE or 15'h St SE.
a Auburn Way Improvements (TIP-3):
o Proiecf Info: This project is based on a completed pre-design study. The focus is
to improve vehicle safety and pedestrian accessibility on Auburn Way between 4tn
St Se and 4th St NE.
.
ciTv oF ' .
-- AUBURN
� �NASHINGiON 8
Future Projects Update (cont.)
� S 277t" St (TIP-6):
❑ This project consists of major roadway widening on S 277'h St from Auburn Way
North to L St NE. Majority of project is expected to be completed by adjacent
development and will include an extension of the Class 1 Trail and a new traffic
signal at the future I St NE intersection.
�� Environmental Park Roadway Study (TIP-47):
u This is a study intended to analyze the feasibility, scope and cost of low impact
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the Environmental Park area.
� Kersey Way Study (TIP-54):
❑ This is a study planned to develop scope and costs for improving roadway
geometry, roadside hazards, lighting and a non-motorized trail along Kersey Way
SE from the White River bridge to the southern city limits.
� Stewart Road Widening (TIP-86):
o This project will construct a five lane section from East Valley Highway to State
Route 167 including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, new pavement and signal
upgrades. Project is entirely in the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. City of Sumner's
portion is under construction except for a new bridge over the White River.
Funding is not secure for completing the segment through Pacific.
I.ITY (lF �
- l �V 1l V 1 �1 \
WASHINGI'C)N �
Future Projects Update (cont.)
� Signal & ITS Improvements:
� Currently the city owns and operates 86 traffic signals. 46 of these are now
connected online to the city's traffic management center including 25 monitoring
cameras.
u South Auburn ITS Expansion (TIP-13): This project is currently under design and
will bring online an additional 14 traffic signals with up to 14 new traffic cameras.
❑ Traffic Signal Improvements (TIP-34): This annual project will be funding safety
improvements at several high accident intersections, battery back-up
improvements at traffic signals adjacent to BNSF rail crossings and access
improvements to the signal at Auburn Ave and 3�d St NE.
u ITS Dynamic Message Signs (TIP-50): This project will install dynamic message
boards giving the city enhanced ability to inform roadway users of traffic
conditions, incidents or other emergency use.
❑ East Valley Highway ITS Expansion (TIP-51 ): This project will expand the ITS
network down East Valley Highway to the southern city limits.
.
c'ITY c�F ' .
l 1V � V �
� 4'VASHIN(� (�C�N t�
r -------- —
� Future Projects Update (cont.)
� Intersection Improvements:
� Harvey Rd & 8t'' St NE (TIP-17): Project is complete. Consisted of adding an
eastbound thru lane, widening of M St NE and pedestrian improvements between
4th St NE and 8th St NE.
u 8t" St NE & R St NE Traffic Signal (TIP-18): Project is in construction phase.
Consists of new traffic signal , pedestrian ramps and access restrictions.
a Auburn Way N & 1St St NE Signal Improvements (TIP-19): This project will replace
the entire existing traffic signal and construct pedestrian improvements.
a Auburn Way South & M St SE (TIP-20): This project is currently in the pre-design
phase and will identify scope and costs for improving traffic operations.
a C St NW & W Main St (TIP-21 ): This project will construct a new traffic signal,
turning radius improvements and pedestrian improvements.
u F St SE & 4�h St SE Traffic Signal (TIP-25) : This project is in the construction
phase and will construct a new traffic signal.
u Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements (TIP-38): This project will construct four
quadrant gates at the BNSF railroad crossings.
❑ Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Improvements (TIP-43): This project includes
construction of dual left turn lanes into the casino, auxiliary signal heads and
pedestrian.
CITY' c1F � • �
A� Bu� - -
� VVASHINGi�ON � �
Future Projects Update (cont.)
�-� M St NE (Tip-11 ): This project will construct a complete 4-lane street
section on M St SE between 4th St NE and E Main St.
� 15'" St SW Reconstruction (TIP-7): This project will improve the roadway
geometry near the Union Pacific rail crossing as well as pavement
reconstruction.
�� West Valley Highway (TIP-14): This project will construct a new traffic signal
at the intersection, reconstruct pavement and widen West Valley highway to
extend the two way left turn lane between W Main St and SR-18.
� gtn St NE (TIP 15): This project will widen the south side of 8t" St NE
between Pike St NE and R St NE.
p 124'" Ave SE & SE 320�h St Corridor Improvements (TIP 40-42): These
projects will improve the streets adjacent to Green River Community
College. GRCC is currently under construction on a major portion of the
124th Ave corridor and Valley Regional Fire Authority will be improving
another section. Staff will continue to work with GRCC on future
improvements and seek funding for remaining phases.
.
ct r�' c�F ' .
---- - - -- l 1�J L V 1 �1 \
� WASHINGIC)N 12
_ _ -- -- -
�
Other Transportation Topics
� Lea H i I I Access:
u During 2009 Comprehensive Transportation plan several options
for improving access onto Lea Hill were explored.
u After completing cost-benefit analysis a determination was made
to program improvements to the existing Lea Hill Road route
rather than construct a new route.
� SR- 164 Bypass Road :
❑ WSDOT has completed preliminary route options analysis for a
new road connecting SR-164 (Auburn Way South) and SR-18.
o Options included street extensions from either Muckleshoot Plaza
or pogwood St SE to new SR-18 interchange east of Auburn
Way Ramps.
❑ Staff will continue to monitor study work with WSDOT and
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe on route development. , -
CfTY c�F •
— - — — ---- --- �L./ � V �
titi'/�1 Fi � i"J(� I (�N 13
Committee of the Whole
Transportation Program Planning
w Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Comp Plan):
� Long Term Planning Document, 2030 Horizon Year
• Based on Land-use and population goals
• Utilizes Traffic Demand Model to identify LOS deficiencies and capacity
projects
• 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP):
• Short Term Planning Document, 2016 Horizon Year
• Projects taken from Comp Plan and other's based on current
operational, safety, mobility or preservation needs.
• Most transportation grants require projects to be listed in the TIP for
eligibility.
�� Both documents are planning tools required to be updated annually
per Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) *
CITY OF � �
_ _�__ _ _ __ AUBU�
� WASHINGTON I
Arterial Corridors & LOS
_
' What is LOS? ArterialCorridorLO55tandards
i t . . .�. I� �
-�� . / � � Posted
m� � i� � Speed MPH 50 40 35 30
f� __ �� (ri� — ��� � . .- - Current city policy for the LOS AverageTravelSpeeds
� i ,., �'�� yI � Arterial LOS Standard is " >^2 >35 >3° >zs
� �" '{�'�� e >3aaz >zs-3s >za-3o >i9-zs
•�: � Fi � the Average Travel Speed � >��-34 >z�-z8 >�8-z4 >�3-�9
���
`` ` l` over a defined corridor . ° >Zl-z' >"-zZ >1"-18 >9-13
� a �
E >16-21 >13-17 >10-14 >7-9
� i n, "
� �� F 516 �13 �10 s7
- ' �ls _-1 a�
�.. �
. � ' __ `_.
a �� - � Group A . 6-Year TIP
i_ �� �I I - �_._._.-,-,.�
, , x ; �
� ,=r_ ,j r oup 8 : Comp Plan
.
T ,
'!,�,� �',�.., f ��,r� "',�, �.,
�
� ^ - E
_�, �.
� '.
`< ;"" - -� -- —
�_,
` � „
, � - _ a�-L- �-�-• �. i m,� __ Questions?
� ei � �� � �� � �-
�— ��AMvn RmspwYtlon Y� r _
O N CoRIdC!5lCt1011f ��������
9�: ❑ CityLimib ��Y� L - '
op�nza _.. _ _ --� - � #.
� M � CITY OF Y -
AUBURN---
WASHINGTON Z
1 - - _ __ __ __
2011-2016 Transportation Improvement Program
� City of Aubum 2017-2016 ,�i,:�„F� � . ..� .. . - . --- �-� .
' � Transportation Improvement Program � � -�-�
- - .,- . . : - -- - - ..
������77^^�� H{ � i
_ - �� ;a \ �,. ' � - -r -. - �.
� ` { q 1 - . —
� � w.. , j,�f � ;t�
.r � f" ��'..� , 3� , : ,w
E . � `' � �. " �- -
;
�+• E _ / s e i ':' � 1 ��- �-
� .w.' � f : ` ' _ .�� r1 i ' ��� � - ..... , e
.
.
' � • i "" ..... .i n..:. .�� .....a
€ i �' i ..�� .w . . .,.... y�.�
` ' r r
f � .
I (i.- e 7 �ci -T
� � � � ��i �� ' �
� � � —
� , .. ; � ; � ,
n..�.�, l � �i , � :
-- �
, , � �,,, ,� �� : � >> ,
• � �� 4 -r-
�
, � � �i � � .l" � , „ ti-, � , � _
,
�. t � �
_ ,
.
r.. ...'� iQ,,,,.sh># : .`� - --� .,� ..-.
., . � � =� �� -_ � , ... . - ..
� r - - �,`-I '� � -. _
' � I _ _
.
� ,.
:'._. o_ = —
_ � � „ t, _ �
I � ' 9� �'� IF �� ,` , _ _ .. :
. l �� �" ....
`� • .. i � � I .
' �\ .T e.. _ �
u �� i
�
1. i� � t _ 't e '
f`� � ��{ �"� i ' "
t. ' " ._�.._'_
4" t�� — -
� F .� —� I �...._ .�..._,.. _ . ... _ _
�,
�2 � .
.
; i . ,. „�..�.
� — —
e . ..� ._ .�. - ._.� . ._,
� ♦ �..y,,..,_ _..� ... � . . . . .::...:.....__. .. ,
. ��,��,.. ..... I I ,.
. , . . . . . _,., .._ �e
� ' ���:'-' � i, _.,.:._._,.._ ,. � ...._ .___ - r
i _ �._.._.___....._._�_ .:__._._._____._::-----'-__,�_..._.. -_.
�, _,..i._._.�._.u._.._ .._.._..�..___._.—
_�.,....._. —.m...�.�.� _ ..�., *
_.A...R....� —...w.. ...._-. - _
—a..�.� —...m..� '�� �� crrY oF •
' ' AUBURN
� WASHINGTON 3
Current Project Updates
� M St Grade Separation (TIP-5) : This project will grade
separate M Street SE from the Burlington northern Santa Fe Stampede
Pass rail line between 3rd Street SE and 6th Street SE.
u Funding Status:
� $22.6M Total Project Cost
� Current funding short fall of $6.8 Million.
� Secured Funding includes $2.6M BNSF/Ports, $1M Federal, $6M FMSIB
(State), $0.2M King County, and $6M City REET & TIF funds.
. Applied for $6.8M PWTF loan as a fall back position. Staff is continuing to seek
grant and federal appropriation opportunities to reduce the PWTF loan
commitment.
� FMSIB funding requires that construction be under by the end of 2011 .
� Project Status:
� Completed 75% Design.
w ROW acquisition in process.
� Construction expected to begin late 2011 depending on funding.
*
CITY OF * •
--� AUBURN -
WASHINGTON 4
Current Project Updates (cont.)
� A -B Corridor Phase 1 (TIP-� ) : This project will complete the
design and construction of the A Street/B St NW connection between 3rd
Street NW and 14th Street NW including a new signal at 3rd St NW.
� Funding Status:
� $12.2M Total Project Cost
� Current Funding Shortfall is $2.825M.
� Secured funding includes $6.581 M Federal, $1 .606M Developer Contributions,
and $1 .202 in City 102, REET and TIF funds.
a Staff is continuing to seek grant and federal appropriation opportunities
u Project Status:
� Completed 90% design.
R ROW acquisition is in process.
� Environmental permitting is in process.
= Construction is expected to begin in summer 2011 depending on funding.
*
CITY OF * «
- AUBU� -_ _
� WASHINGTON 5
� Current Project Updates (cont.)
� S Division St Promenade (TIP-52) : This project will develop
a comprehensive promenade along S Division Street between Main
Street and 3rd Street SE/SW. Improvements includes new water, sanitary
sewer, and storm drainage utilities as well as wide sidewalks, new
pavement, street lighting, street furniture and new traffic signal at Main St.
� Funding Status:
� $8M Total Project Cost
� Project is fully funded by $5M in State Local Revitalization Financing and a $3M
Economic Development Administration (Federal) Grant.
o Project Status:
. Design is about 60% complete.
� Environmental approvals are completed.
� Construction is anticipated to begin Spring of 2011
�
CITY OF * �
_ __ __ . _ - _ _ _ .__ _ __ _ _ AUBV� �.
WASHINGTON �
Current Project Updates (cont.)
� AMTRAK Stop in Auburn (TIP-A) : Washington State
Department of Transportation (WSDOT) is planning an Amtrak "Service
Development Plan". The plan will evaluate existing and future service
plans along the Seattle-Portland intercity Amtrak passenger rail corridor.
The City of Auburn is actively advocating for WSDOT to include service to
Auburn's Transit Center in the studies focus.
❑ Funding Status:
� WSDOT has submitted a Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) grant request to
fund the study. FRA funding decision is pending.
u Study Status:
� Pending Funding.
«
�
CITY OF =
AUBURN ---
� WASHINGTON �
Future Projects Update
■ SR-1641mprovements:
� Project Info: Route Development Plan was completed by WSDOT. Improvements
identified include widening, pedestrian and intersection improvements from 6th St
Se to Southern City limits. No funding is in place for these improvements.
� I St NE Corridor (TIP-4):
� Project Info: Project will construct the I St NE extension between 40th St NE and S
277th St. This project is driven by development of adjacent properties.
� Grade Separated Crossing at BNSF Railyard (Tip-12):
� Project Info: This project is intended to provide mitigation for potential expansion
of operations at the BNSF railyard. Improvements include a grade separated
crossing at either 6th St SE or 15th St SE.
` Auburn Way Improvements (TIP-3):
o Proiect Info: This project is based on a completed pre-design study. The focus is
to improve vehicle safety and pedestrian accessibility on Auburn Way between 4tn
St Se and 4t'' St NE.
�
CITY OF * -
�- - _ AUBU�-_
WASHINGTON �
Future Projects Update (cont.)
� S 277t" St (TIP-6):
o This project consists of major roadway widening on S 277th St from Auburn Way
North to L St NE. Majority of project is expected to be completed by adjacent
development and will include an extension of the Class 1 Trail and a new traffic
signal at the future I St NE intersection.
� Environmental Park Roadway Study (TIP-47):
� This is a study intended to analyze the feasibility, scope and cost of low impact
roadway, bicycle and pedestrian improvements in the Environmental Park area.
. Kersey Way Study (TIP-54):
❑ This is a study planned to develop scope and costs for improving roadway
geometry, roadside hazards, lighting and a non-motorized trail along Kersey Way
SE from the White River bridge to the southern city limits.
� Stewart Road Widening (TIP-86):
� This project will construct a five lane section from East Valley Highway to State
Route 167 including bicycle and pedestrian facilities, new pavement and signal
upgrades. Project is entirely in the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. City of Sumner's
portion is under construction except for a new bridge over the White River.
Funding is not secure for completing the segment through Pacific. *
CITY OF -
�. .__� AUBU�____
� WASHINGTON �
Future Projects Update (cont.)
■ Signal & ITS Improvements:
� Currently the city owns and operates 86 traffic signals. 46 of these are now
connected online to the city's traffic management center including 25 monitoring
cameras.
� South Auburn ITS Expansion (TIP-13): This project is currently under design and
will bring online an additional 14 traffic signals with up to 14 new traffic cameras.
� Traffic Signal Improvements (TIP-34): This annual project will be funding safety
improvements at several high accident intersections, battery back-up
improvements at traffic signals adjacent to BNSF rail crossings and access
improvements to the signal at Auburn Ave and 3�d St NE.
� ITS Dynamic Message Signs (TIP-50): This project will install dynamic message
boards giving the city enhanced ability to inform roadway users of traffic
conditions, incidents or other emergency use.
� East Valley Highway ITS Expansion (TIP-51 ): This project will expand the ITS
network down East Valley Highway to the southern city limits.
�
CITY OF * -
_ _ _ _ _ __ -�. AUBV�-
� WASHINGTON lo
Future Projects Update (cont.)
■ Intersection Improvements:
� Harvey Rd & 8th St NE (TIP-17): Project is complete. Consisted of adding an
eastbound thru lane, widening of M St NE and pedestrian improvements between
4th St NE and 8th St NE.
� 8th St NE & R St NE Traffic Signal (TIP-18): Project is in construction phase.
Consists of new traffic signal , pedestrian ramps and access restrictions.
� Auburn Way N & 15t St NE Signal Improvements (TIP-19): This project will replace
the entire existing traffic signal and construct pedestrian improvements.
� Auburn Way South & M St SE (TIP-20): This project is current�y in the pre-design
phase and will identify scope and costs for improving traffic operations.
� C St NW & W Main St (TIP-21 ): This project will construct a new traffic signal,
turning radius improvements and pedestrian improvements.
� F St SE & 4t" St SE Traffic Signal (TIP-25) : This project is in the construction
phase and will construct a new traffic signal.
� Railroad Crossing Safety Improvements (TIP-38): This project will construct four
quadrant gates at the BNSF railroad crossings.
� Auburn Way South & Riverwalk Improvements (TIP-43): This project includes
construction of dual left turn lanes into the casino, auxiliary signal heads and
pedestrian.
*
.
CITY OF �
AUBURN �
� WASHINGTON 11
Future Projects Update (cont.)
� M St NE (Tip-11 ): This project will construct a complete 4-lane street
section on M St SE between 4'" St NE and E Main St.
� 15'h St SW Reconstruction (TIP-7): This project will improve the roadway
geometry near the Union Pacific rail crossing as well as pavement
reconstruction.
= West Valley Highway (TIP-14): This project will construct a new traffic signal
at the intersection, reconstruct pavement and widen West Valley highway to
extend the two way left turn lane between W Main St and SR-18.
, gth St NE (TIP 15): This project will widen the south side of 8th St NE
between Pike St NE and R St NE.
� 124th Ave SE & SE 320t" St Corridor Improvements (TIP 40-42): These
projects will improve the streets adjacent to Green River Community
College. GRCC is currently under construction on a major portion of the
124th Ave corridor and Valley Regional Fire Authority will be improving
another section. Staff will continue to work with GRCC on future
improvements and seek funding for remaining phases.
�
CfiY OF * *
_ AUBU�
� WASHINGTON 12
Other Transportation Topics
� Lea H i I I Access:
� During 2009 Comprehensive Transportation plan several options
for improving access onto Lea Hill were explored.
� After completing cost-benefit analysis a determination was made
to program improvements to the existing Lea Hill Road route
rather than construct a new route.
•� SR-164 Bypass Road :
�� WSDOT has completed preliminary route options analysis for a
new road connecting SR-164 (Auburn Way South) and SR-18.
o Options included street extensions from either Muckleshoot Plaza
or pogwood St SE to new SR-18 interchange east of Auburn
Way Ramps.
❑ Staff will continue to monitor study work with WSDOT and
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe on route development. , R I
��.�__ - - ___ _-�- �._a� - -- �. a_ �CITY O� --
AU URN
� WASHINGTON 13
�� *
Vision As a.city of regional significance, proud of'its small town heritage, /�_�T �T�—g���7
for � as well as the diversity of'its people and neighborhoods; � LzIJ� �V Ytl�l
Aubum's Future \ { / %r�� Y`
Aubum o ersran oppo[tunity forpeople of•all ages.t enjo� pPF.THANYOU/MqGMEn
��
Strategies ��One Auburn" SusiainalYi[ity':: :;:;�is�i�jk;:;`':'.' Partnerships Livability ----------------
A strong sense of community,allowing Emnomic viabili
that 8u Ott b', Con6nually seeking arM
PP all people to appreciate each�hro h Striving for ihe best in maintaining pmtlucGve Ro�iding a safe and
�9 coupletl with envimnmental
the Vision celeDration antl working together to stewardship,while planning and P�PIe,prqects aiW relaUonships wifh our Internal and desirabla communRy
solva problems cooperatively ac[ing(or our future �M�s ex�ema�partners
.: . . . . . . . . ., , . . .
Goals Revitalize 20 Development of 1° > Continued �a„ } Continue efforts � Promote �
to Irtlplement and re-develop Airportarea > commitmentto topartnerwith;fund stability in __—�___
the Stfategies Urban Cen[er ° SOS Program and enhance human� �eighbofioods
with eztended Study feasibility of 10 ;: services �and the downtown ___�_
.. . . . . . . . . . . . < . .,
.,
areas relocating the sirport ; Pursue street��, }
COunCil to the Academy area ; bond to:bring Continue to seek ❑° ICreate ' �' ______________
"HiSlh VOted" Develop " ' ' ' ' ' ' ;: � all arterials to at ; opportunities to �medical I hospitaf _
Community Develop � : � Ieast 70% partner and zone
DiSCUss'ton Centerat Les environmental � condition index work with the —____
Goals Gove Park ' building, commercial ; ratlng Muckleshoot Indian �Improve �o,�,
; and technology in the :E ;� . , . , , , . . • • . . . :; Tribe Ilighting for _____—_��__—__
o ' � � edestrian;safet :
Work toward � Green Zone '. ; Preserve �;; P Y -----------------
Relerencenumbersantl �:�:�:�:�:�: :�:� �: v �
IeUersarehanlheVsbn unificationof �.�.�.�.�.�. .�.� ;, � former Integrete �.�o,,, ------
zoisu:�. �ew Develop " :: � CamegleLibrary ;, pu6liceffortswith (Continue �`,�, —
communitles Environmental Park • and former efforls of service efforts lo make
COW means Aiscussim at
c�,�n�murewn�ie. with centralized ; Post Office clubs and faith Aubum's Urban ----
communication Review zoning � � � community Center more —
COM means aiscussion in � � � �
ca,��i c�m�neas and outreach to ` codeswithin Urban : Encourage � ; pedestrian --- ---
bring them into Center to allow ; public art on 'fiendly ------ ---
the existing increased � downtown
communiry E; development/density :: ' buildings
� ;�;
�� 1f._*
Vision As a city of regional significance„proud�of its small town heritage, eC �'
for � as well�:as the;diVersity of its,people and neighborhoods, � �l%�-� ' � � �
Aubum's Future � Mp0.F.��iAN Y0U/�G�NE(t
Auburn;o ers an opportunity for people of all:ages t enjo�y lif�
��
Strategies "One Auburn" =:�ustainalsHitjt:: :::;t�;ali�::`�`�'� Partnerships Livability --------------
A stron9 sense of communiry,allowing Economic viebility, Cun4ni�ally seeking entl
that Support aii a ie ro a redate each lhro, h s�hrre ror me oesc m
P oP PV �9 ' coupled wifh�anvironmental meinteining proEuctNe Providing e sefe and�
the Vision celebrallon and worltin t ether to people,proJects en0
9 a9 steweMship;while plennlriq entl �rv��a relationships with our intemal and deslreble communiry .
solveproblemscooperativety acting�forounWture extemapahnera
GOals Promote � Complete.A/B St. �, E Complete �,, , Complete'I'SL �„', Complete "
to Imple�tl8�t continuous and develop gatewaypro�ects : corridor from 40th SR164
th2 StfBtegies community adJacent areas � : 'St.to 277th St. Improvements
outreach.by .•. . . . .�. .�. . . . ' : provide�fiber �$,,, ,
citizenls and i'Development �oZ,,, : `� optic corridor �Build:out'I'St. �cow Create �
COUnCiI of the Robertson ❑ '` ; throughout the corridor with
businesses in ' medical/hospital
"HiSih Voted" their City !Valley Drive-in : downtown, begin : appropriate buffers ' Zone
DisCUSSiOn 9ovemment ?: properties : with the AEP
. . . . . . .. : Green Zone O,
Goals Promote � E: Greate��� � � �. ❑'� Complete
... . . . . . . . . . . . .
ride in Aubum 'M' St underpass
P Aubum WaySouth
-IPs More Than re-developmenPplan ;��:
neterercenumbersand YOU'Iff1aQ111Bd - � � EfISUfe�U181 � '
letlers ara ham Ne Ysion . - - - - �
zo,sur. Aubum is a•safe
pe�elop � Ilmprove � Institute inner E❑
COW means d'swssim at ' 8fid:SeCUf2"P�BCR .
�,,,�;�o��„�. one-stop-multi- animal control city shultle to�live or'have a
... . .::
. . . . . _
se[vice center
COMmeensOixussbnin ' �� ��� �- � �� I��C�UC�8th8 �M 6omplete:City �oM : ! business
ca�ic�mma� iDevelop Olson coM ' 'area on Aubum Hall Plaza
Greek complex from ,Way'So.�from
'Fartn to Golf Course �F'St:to 12th St Improve �,,, . —
iimLes Gove and expand —
Considecan Aubum �� '; _ iCommunity ; publicparking — -
''i iHousing�Authority ; ,Campus opportunities ------------
�� � *
Vision � As a city of regional significance, proutl ofits sma�l town heritage; � eg � '�-�'����-�T'
for as-well as the diversity oYits people and neighborhoods, .�'1�1J��811�I
Aubum's Future Auburn o ers�an o i°"�'--M���~µY����MAGMEn.
pportunity forpeople of:all ages t enjo�y lif�
��
Strategies "�ne Auburn" Sustainab?fity ��i� Partnerships �Livability ,________ __ _
:;:;Cs�!
that Su Ort A strong sensa of community,allowing Economic viability, Continually seeking and
pP Striving for[he bes[in
all peoplelo appreciate each fhrough coupled wi[h environmental maintaining productive �Providirg a safe and
the Vision celebration antl working toge[he�to stewardship,while planning antl �°P1e•P�ojec[s antl relationships with our intemal and desirable communiry
solve problems cooperativety acting for our future ����s eMema�partners
�vuu��;u��� �Y.y�lYl�y�}� .
Goals 8 3'. . _ 35. � ' F _
Complete � IDevelopment of oQ '_ �Rebuild Proactively � iMarket Aubum Q
to Implement Thomas IGolden Triangle area icross town work w/BNSF to �as the regional
the Strat2gies annexation ' � ;connector bridge encourage buffer enteRainment
;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::�
• _ !overtrain yard areas at rail yard jcenter
.s :? RedeVelop o j
Complete � .
Council Rie�ce,County :: 'C St. SW and = 'Complete o ,� Development " 'Complete Link �"
�� �� annexations ' 15th St.SW propertes Road from SR18
Lowe�Voted 3; ,,,,, ,,,,,,,, ,, , j iSR 167&SR 18 � of Emerald Downs ,to SR964
DiscussiOn . `., :., ; ':::.:= iinterchange area
Annez'D"St! o , Add comm9 zoning o ' s
Goals Stuck = ,a a, Ensure that ,
� ) , to industnal areas �Continue o ! Muckleshoot o
� � Aubum is a safe �
neighborhood . �:' ''� ' ,advocacy for Tribe's economic
:.....,....,.,,..,.,..,.,...n: : ` '' : E : E.: E E E` E : , and secure,place �
R�r���„mbars a�a :.....:.. ' AMTRAK stop development area
. ,6 . ; . ;to live or have a
IettersarefmmNeYsion + za �Develop�/�improve o�.;• � �
zoisrs�. : Encoura9e o0 t _ _ business �
? develo menFof MultiCare site • p - — __._._. _ _.__
P t IPursue o0 Increase SR 167 10
COW means tliscussion al ; nei hborhood ' z' �
c�m�neaamawnae. ; 9 i : : :� " " ioppoAunitiesfor �'Develop � 4
' west of'C St. � 15 ' = to 4lanes each•side
cot,�meansdisassionin ` � 'Restore Miq Creek � ��.�ndood outdoor . espressofjuice bar :.
� corridorb � ' �
ca�i comm�n�s ; y . �soccer facilities ; 8 bike/skate shop ;
: extending sky �`�: Add hauLroute o �' on Interurban
? tiridge across :E �Rezone southof 'o "'` from'R°Sf. to ! Trail '
.
. . . . . . .
; 'C"St. SuperMail commercial iDevelop o � iEllingson ,
IB
_ `: working ; Build south �
Restore "' ' ' ' ' ` ' relationships ; ' , end trail loop and
White Lake Relocate M80 "` with universities ; New Post�Office' o horse trail
'� ' .` . .'
c.:...... ..........:. ........................................................: .
Budgeting for Results in an
`A e o Pe�Ynanent Fiscal
- g .f
� C�ises '
Quote by David Osborne & Peter
Hutchinson from the book The Price of
Government
.
W at ' s in a name .
� BFO (Budgeting for Outcomes)
�- POG ( Priorities of Government)
POG ( Price of Government)
_ Budget 1 (Bellevue's process)
� Renton Results ( Renton 's process)
� Budgeting by Priorities (Redmond 's process)
Budgeting for Outcomes (BFO)
What is the difference between traditional
budgeting and BFO?
How does the BFO process work?
t
; Typical limitations of traditional budgeting
.
and measuring outcomes
_
Dollars aren 't clearly linked to priorities in the
beginning .
�� Near total focus on cost, not value (price) .
w
� Department-by-department budgeting has
some built-in limitations (see next page) .
� Limitations of department by
� department budget
Departmental structure works well for policy and program
execution, not as well for linking spending to government-wide
strategies and objectives.
Budget are justified based on departmental priorities, not
necessarily city-wide priorities
Traditional process creates assumptions about relationship
between issues, departments and budgets.
Departments often viewed as "owning" issues (e.g., public
- safety is an issue, not a department)
Departments often viewed as "owning" their past budget $$
_ (e.g., assumptions about "base" departmental budget)
Bilateral discussions between budget office and departments
offer little opportunity in the process for interdepartmental
collaboration.
�
: • • • . - • • . • • . : • • - •
Traditional BFO
Focus Add to or cut departmental Fund programs and activities
"base budgets" that support agreed upon
strategies that have been
developed to meet objectives
Budget requests Departments ask for Results for a price (value):
amount that can be justified Propose programs that
based on ongoing activities evidence says are highly
(plus a little extra) likely to produce desired
results, efficiently.
Budget office job Find places to cut, balance Test the logic of proposed
the budget solutions: the alignment
between outcomes,
programs, and funding. Push
for greater efficiency.
Balance the budget
� • � • / . � tl � � Y
� � � ' �
w
Traditional BFO
Debate What can we How do we get
cut? even better
` results with our
resources?
- Decision Avoiding pain, Getting better
drivers being fair (to results for the
internal community
stakeholders)
and getting it
done
BFO changes the game, begins with
questions that matter
, How much revenue do we have to devote to
our needs?
What results matter most to our community -
; what are its priorities?
How much should we spend to achieve each
result?
� How can we BEST deliver results our people
—
want/expect?
;.
Some governments that have used
� BFO
City of Redmond , WA
Implemented in its 2009-2010 Biennial Budget
State of lowa
Used Budgeting for Outcomes to close an approximate
$350 million budget gap
City of Azusa, CA
Faced a 10% gap between expected revenues & costs
in general fund budget of $29 million
� City of Fort Collins, CO
_ Trimmed $5 million from budget to meet shortfall .
Successfully passed a ballot measure to fund a new
library district due to increased process transparency
� BFO has been implemented in all
� kinds of governments
cities
States Redmond, WA
Washington Spokane, WA
Tacoma Metro Parks
IOWa Azusa, CA
South Carolina Savannah, �a
Los Angeles
MlChigan Dallas, TX
Louisiana Dept, of Culture, Ft. Collins, co
Rec & Tourism Grand Rapids, MI
_ , Oregon Dept. of Education Counties
Manitoba Snohomish, wa.
� Multnomah, Oregon
Mesa County, CO
School Districts Polk County, F�
Jefferson County, CO Jefferson County, co
Billings, MT
Typical BFO Structure
City Council
City Manager/
Administrator/
Mayor
Steering Team
Process Support
� Team
Results Team 1 Results Team 2 Results Team 3 Results Team n
BFO ' s Eight Steps
1 . Identify available revenue – all of it
;
° 2 . Set high level priorities
�
� 3 . Allocate all revenues to the priorities
�
_ 4 . Create " Request for Results"
5. I nvite/prepare offers
�- 6 . Ra n k Offe rs
— 7 . Decide what offers to "buy"
8 . Present the budget
Bud etin for Outcomes Process
g g
cnoose
priorities of
government
Create requests Invite offers
for results from sellers Rank the
offers
Present the
Allocate funds Decide what Outcome
to priorities to buy Budget
Establish the
price of
government
Getting Started : The First 3 Steps
These 3 steps set the stage for the rest of the
process
Determining total revenues
Setting the big priorities
Allocating revenues to these priorities
Do at the beginning of the process
_ These are key policy decisions and involve
top management and the City Council
City of Redmond Budgeting by Priorities Process
� ' ` P � � ; �
,� � , ' � � � � � � . �
�
rioriti s nfrastructure Environment Community i
� -
we aRe � � L�� - Each Results Team develops a
HERE ".Et�R Business Govemment Request for Offers to Support its
Conflrm City Priorities with priority. Each RFO includes 3
Community City Council confirms priorities Results Teams (including ciiy indicators, a cause-and-effect
� based on input from citizens in staff and citizens) are formed � map and purchasing strategies.
focus groups and open meeting around each priorily On redmond.gov by April 16
S Offer Otfer
1 ` t � � �•� -
� '� � � 3 Offer � 3 Offer
� � Offer Offer 2 ,� t 2
Results Team � �
� By June 20 By July 21
Starting April 25, departments
review RFOs and data and Results Teams rank the offers Based on rankings and
Citizens review RFOs, come to decide on offers to write up for based on contribution to ihe feedback, Departments revise
April 24 meeting to submit their submittal to Results Teams on factors on ihe cause and effect and resubmit offers by July 7.
suggestions to departments June 6. rpyp. Results Teams rank offers
again, this time including
mandates
�V, ' r � �
� . = , � ! �' �
� ' ;..
� t
� �. . . , :
�n , - ��:;e�_
— - `;�t , r .
~T Council reviews budget,
Results Teams use rankings to Mayor uses Results Mayor presents holds public hearings
develop recommended Teams
purchases to advance priority. recommendaiions to Budget to Council (Oct 21 8� Nov 18) and
develop Budget on Oct 14 adopts final budget in
Present to Mayor on July 24 Nov/Dec
Mesa County Citizens Big Priorities
I want Mesa County to manage I want to feel safe anytime,
and preserve public resources. anywhere in Mesa County.
Continue to efficiently and effectively protect and Mission Statement Continue to promote and protect public safety
manage all public resources
In partnership with citizens,
Mesa County will maintain and enhance
quality of life by effectively
� providing community services that
ensure public health, safety, and well
being in a transparent and equitable way.
I want Mesa County to have a I want a community where
Variety of industries that will S/ogan citizens of all ages can be
promote a healthy economy. Mesa County—Creating a community healthy and successful.
of opportunities for all residents
Promote economic vitality in Mesa County wlth 8 fOCUS Ofl th2 futUfe. Continue to promote and protect public
health and ihe success of all citizens.
I want plans and infrastructure that
maintain quality of life
in the face of rapid growth.
Create well-planned and developed communities
MESA
COUNTY
Washington State Big 10 Priorities
Student achievement in elementary, middle
and high schools ;
Quality and productive workforce ;
- Value of a state college or university
education ;
Health of Washington 's citizens ;
— Security of Washington 's vulnerable children
and adults ; cont.
Washington State Big 10 Priorities
(cont.)
The vitality of businesses and individuals ;
Statewide mobility of people , goods,
; information , and energy;
�
The safety of people and property;
The quality of Washington 's priceless and
natural resources ;
— Cultural and recreational opportunities .
4
Redmond ' s Big Priorities
,
Business Community
Environment — Clean and Green
Community Building
� Infrastructure and Growth
K Responsible Government
Safety
' Renton ' s Big Priorities
Safety and Health
Livable Community
� Mobility
Utilities & Environment
Representative Government
�-- � - Underlying These Five Priorities is Internal
— Services
See inserted priority map
BFO Step 4 : Creating Requests for
Results (RFR)
Teams are selected for priorities.
Each team prepares a RFR
� Use cause-and-effect analysis , strategy
mapping to identify effective strategies,
interventions
Consolidated RFRs constitute the budget
instructions/preparation forms
Using strategy maps to develop
approaches for achieving goals
Proposals need to show the link between
� what we spend money on (our activities) and
the results we need to achieve .
Value for citizens means getting results at a
good price , so efficiency matters too .
Using initial and intermediate outcomes helps
—
to bridge the gap from day-to-day activities to
high-level , community outcomes .
�� � 4� � � � �� � � � �ir�,��ir�1 �
r
, : � � _
� , � , � �
r . �
�. ,.. ,, � - :i:�,
� � ,�,:,
i �. ,,., i , .�� :_:
"I warri ta di►ae in a cily af'sborag
antl vibrrr�al neigiaborlr�arls 1hu1
are clean, sa�'e, anrl eiacoarrage a
sense uf conr��rruuiy."
_ _ �" _ --
` .�::�.: - , i ,
i � I 3 �,� e� � �.,��� Btdicatol'S ' ' � . � , a�� �'�.�, i,`�
, � : ;� � Itucreased hr_�tneouniership iates , ,,- � ��, -- -
iilici � � t(ii i *i � jYtCI1EBSBC�riC�l�OT}100C� . ;1 - I ��
u;�,: ,� ��_r� , ti4, � ;,.� puitwipationLveLs -
,a _
� Improvedpti�rate andpublir. _ -
_ ` ' --_ �` : -� - �
--�-�, �;-•-, _-- — -- -
� ?���" _ prc+�ettycotuldwr�;
� Red��cedvacant lats and
dilapidated sttuctures
�`.
� Redmond Maps
See attachments
BFO Step 5 : Preparing Offers
Sellers (departments) respond to Requests
for Results with Offers (not an entire
departmental budget) .
Offers explain how a program or activities will
achieve desired results - a perFormance
commitment at a price .
Offers assume no guarantee of funding
based on historic funding levels .
� Show connections via a value
chain
Offers need to show the link between what we spend
money on (our activities) and priority results
Value for citizens means getting results at a good
price, so efficiency matters too
BFO Step 6 & 7 : Ranking Offers and
deciding what to buy
Buyers (Results Teams) seek the most for the money
— what is most likely to achieve the desired result?
_ �
-- �
4�ro�rani r�► rrv��n, r,
� � �
t,�' �,�� �.a�, . -
,�� +� ;.,,,� t� ��`u�
y�;����1�� '- _:��
''�,�.. �'�1��" ��
� � ,� ' � �
' '�;ev.aa t� 16�'� �`�'�
� j,�n�� �•.,,}� \
V ��--- �+ ;
� �
[:J
Budgeting for Outc�mes
Ranking by Results Team
P�autr AI'C 1\1'11(I�(I a� follo��•�: H��h 3 �>oiut.. �lediun� � po�uts. ,�nd L�n� l poini
Safe�ty �a> �2� c�l
Score Hign Medlum Low
� CounryProbatlon - - - - - - - - - - -24 - - -8- - - - - - - - �
I Advanced Llfe Supporl 24 8 �
I Emergenry blgmt � Operelions 24 8
I Ftodio Sys Malnt. S Opor�llons 23 7 t �
�f� � I Communicaton Center 23 7 1 �
� Msdical ControlFTralnmg 22 6 2 �
� Electronlc Moniroring 19 3 5 �
� Radlo 5ystems Managertwn! 16 8 �
� Record�JBllUng 16 8 �
� Medicai Ex�minar 15 1 5 2 �
Anlm�l Control 12 4 4 �
-�� � ����.��..�. �-�zz�-� ���
� L~our'[i y�a_ltnquency�reven�ion 'i0" AZ' �"�
I Alternative Community Service 10 : 6 �
�a�� � I Pradisposltbn of Juvanllas 10 2 6 �
� Facllliin S�cunty 8 8 �
� Driver Educatlon Trusl F�nd_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 8 _I
BFO Step 8 : Presenting the Budget
Proposed budget presented by chief
- executive – as always
Budget deliberations focus on what works to
achieve priorities not who can lobby the
hardest
Conversation changes from single-issue
� discussions to relative value
— All sellers are still involved , those above and
below the line
Benefits of a BFO Process
Pushes lower-value spending out of the
budget, moves high value to top of list.
Focuses on results , not budget inputs or
programs in a vacuum .
Enables managers to better make the case ,
show how spending is linked to results , the
_ - logic of their offers (activities and programs) .
— Produces information that better enables
citizens to see the value they get for their fees
and taxes.
In times of fiscal stress , BFO
Offers a rational alternative to across-the-board cuts, treating
last year's budget as the "ideal", and similar input-driven
approaches.
Provides a structured process for prioritizing activities and
programs in light of available $$.
Focuses everyone on how best to spend the revenue we have
rather than on what we used to do with the revenue we used to
have.
. Emphasizes the price of government (a value concept), not just
the cost.
Next Steps