HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-12-2009 NOTICE OF SPECIAL AUBURN CITY COUNCIL MEETING
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 9, 2009
Contact: Danielle Daskam, City Clerk
Phone: (253) 931-3037
Email Address: ddaskam@auburnwa.gov �
Notice is hereby given that the City Council ofi the Gity of Auburn will con.duct a
special meeting on Thursday, February 12, 2009. The meeting will begin at 8:30
a.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the following topics:
A. City Hall Projects under discussion
1. City Hall Annex
2. Community Center
3. SCORE
4. Promenade
5. City Hall Plaza
B. F�ecutive Session - property acquisition, 30 minutes
C. Additional Retreat Topics Related to Council Vision and
Goals and Planning Discussion
D. Adjoumment
The meeting will be a work session and 4he Council will take no action.
The meeting will be held at the Dumas Bay Centre, 3200 SW Dash Point Road,
Federal Way, WA, 98023.
Should you have any questions or comments regarding this meeting please
contact City Clerk Danielle Daskam at (253) 931-3037.
�
City Clerk's O�ce
25 West Main Street
Aubum WA 98001
(253) 931-3039
www.auburnwa.gov
2009 City of Auburn
Council Retreat
� � �
c�� oF � � �
�
��
� �
_ ��� wASHI �GTC)N
�ebruary 12, 2009
Conclusion: Buy via bond issue
Lease is$175,000 more expensive in the Frst 5 years. Subsequent years
would show a greater lease cost due to the 60 month rent adjustment increase.
Bond payments would remain fixed.
Funding of City Hall Annex
Based on first 5 years of lease
Costs do not include Tenant Improvements/FFE
Annual debt Service $ 1,684,925
Annuallease Pa ment $ 1,649,730 Plus �o tax
Benefitting Bond/
Fund/De artment Peroenta e Bu Lease Difference
Water 12.07% 203,370 199,122 4,248
Sewer 11.27% 189,891 185,925 3,966
Stortn 11.74% 197,810 193,678 4,132
Solid Waste 3.33% 56;108 54,936 1,172
Total Utiliry l 647;180 -_ .63366t - 13;518
Development Services 6.85% 115,417 113,007 2,411
Building Inspection 9.25% 155,856 152,600 3;256
Engineering 27.29% 459,816 450,211 9,605
SOS 0.73% 12,300 12,043 257
Arterial 4.25% 71,609 70,114 1,496
Planning 13.22% 222,747 218,094 4,653
Total General Govemment � 1,037,745_ T,016;069 21,,677
45.49% 1,684,925 1,649,730 35,195
NNN Property Tax 210,210 210,210
I 1,684,925 1,859,940 (175,015)
The Details(and Devils in them)
Debt Service Assumotions:
5.50%
30 Years
Dces not include estimated$3.5 M in TI and FFE
Purchase
42114 sq.ft@ $ 475 $ 20,004,150
9789 sq.ft. @ $ 386 3,778,554
1982 sq.R. @ $ 356 705,592
Annual Debt Service: $ 24,488,296
$ 1,684,925
Lease
42114 sq. ft@ $ 32 $ 1,347,648
9789 sq. ft. @ $ 26 254,514
1982 sq. ft. @ $ 24 47,568
$ 1,649,730
Does not include estimated $3.5 M in TI and FFE
Property Tax Assumptions:
$33 M AV•49%space @$13/1,000
Funding of City Hall Annex
Based on flrst 5 yeare o(lease
Cosis do noI include Tenant Impmveman�s/FFE
Annual deEl Service y '1.684,925
Annuel Lease Pa meM E 1.649.730 Plus ro e lae
Benefltling Bond/
FunNDe artment PercenU e Bu Lease DiRerence
Watar 12.07°h 203,370 199.122 4,248
SBwer 1127% 189,891 185,925 3,9fifi
Slortn 11:74% 197,810 193,678 4,132
Solld Wasle 3.33% Sfi,108 54,93fi 7,772
i- �847{180 �633.661. . �.13.578.
DeveloOmeM Senices 6.85°h 115,417 113,007 2.411
BuilCinginspeclion 925% 155,85fi 152,600 3,256
Subttle 54.57%: 277273 265,607 5668
Engineering 2729% 459,816 450,211 9,fi05
SOS 0.73% 12,300 12,043 257
Arterlal 425% 71,B09 70,114 1,496
Planning 1322% 222,747 218,094 4,653
I 786.472 150,462' Y6.010
100.00% 1.fi84925 1,649,730 35,195
NNN Pmperry Taz 210,210� '210.270
C - �.1.684�.925� __1.859.940 175.075
Concluslon: Buy via bond issue
Lease Is E175.000 mwe expenslve in iha frst 5 years. Subsequent years
would show s grea[er lease mst due to ihe 60 moMh rent etljustmenl increase.
Bond paymen[s would remain fi�ed.
The Detalb(and Devlls In them)
DoEt Sarvka Ateumntlone:
5.50%
30 Years
Does not induCe estlmated$3.5 M in TI entl FFE
Purohese
42174 sq.ft(� $ <75 E 20,004,150
9789 Sq.ft.(a� $ 3B6 3,778,554
7982 sp.ft.Q $ 356 705.592
Annual Deb[Service: $ 24,A88,298
.§ 1.684.925
L�me
bzti65a.n� a az� a i.3a�.sae
9789 sq.R.� E 2fi 254,574
1982 sQ.fl.(� $ 24 67.560
$ 7.649.730
Does nW Indutla esHmetad$3�.5 M in TI antl FFE
Prope�ty Tex Assumptlone:
$33 M AV'�49%9pet8 @$13A,000
C:\Documents and SettingslEhinmanlDesktop109-Cancil Retreat\Ot-Ciry Hall Annen�ease verses buylease verses huy 2/t0Y1009
Finance Department Memorandum
Date: 2/12/2009
To: City Council
Cc: Pete Lewis, Mayor
From: Shelley Coleman, Finance Director
Re: SCORE Financing Update
The Finance Director's of the SCORE cities met on the 5�h of February 2009. In
previous discussion it was decided an initial capital contribution would be
required in March of 2009. The total contribution for all the cities is just under
$5.2 million, before the estimated proceeds from the Bellevue property were
considered. The SCORE cities anticipate receiving $3.18 million leaving a net
balance of $2.02 million. Auburn's total share for the 2009 contribution is $1.514
million before the $802,187 Auburn is anticipated to receive from the Bellevue
Property.
Discussions centered around the pending bond issue which is anticipated to
occur in the Summer (July) of 2009 and the bond issue will now repay the initial
cash contributions and fund the construction. When the Bellevue property sells,
those funds will go into the construction fund. The initial cash contribution
reimbursement, bond issuance, project administration, start up, site, design, and
construction costs are estimated to be just under $100 million.
The bond will be a 30 year bond and it is estimated to be issued at 5.5%. The
annual payment should be just under $6.9 million. Auburn's share at 29% is $2
million. There were two 30 year issues sold last week and the highest was 5.2%.
Attached is the funding model with 146 of the vacant beds rented with a
$40/bed/day additional cost. Please note that Auburn's share of the
maintenance and operation plus debt will be just under $7 million at 29%
ownership. Income to Auburn (29%) from the anticipated rented beds is
estimated to be about $2.3 million. Auburn's annual cost under this model will be
between $4.6 and $4.7 million. The current jail budget for Auburn in 2009 is $4.4
million and is estimated to grow to just under $5.5 million in 2012. The annual
cost to Auburn could be more or less than the current model reflects. It is
solely dependent on the number of beds rented, and available to be rented,
and Auburn's actual ADP (Adult Daily Population). To reiterate, the model is
predicated on Auburn using 115 beds and successfully renting 146 beds at the
rate of $150 per day.
Score Adopted Financial Model
ANNUAI DEBT SERVICE S 6,893,797
NUMBER OF CITY OPERATED BEDS
City Operational Percentage of City
GTY 2007 ADP 15%Op Reserve Beds Operational Beds
Auburn 100 15 115 29%
Burien 12 2 14 4%
DesMoines 17 3 20 5%
Tukwila 28 4 32 8%
Federal Way 58 9 67 17%
Renton 117 18 135 34%
SeaTac 10 2 12 3%
Total City Operational Beds 393
M&O COST BASED ON ASSUMED BED USAGE
Precentage Assumption for Rental Beds SU����
City Operational Beds 393 540 3 9,683.064
Rented Beds(Opereting Cosq 146 $ 3,603,144
Empry Beds(Operating Cosq 146 S 3.603,144
Total M&O Costs ; 16,889,352
REVENUE
Rented Beds 146
Rental Rate , � ��
Tolal Revenue $8.012,ti63
FINAL COST AND EFFECTIVE CITY DAILY RATE Rate per Bed
(Costs allocaled among 393 beds) per Day
M&O $ 16.889,352 $ 117.65
Annual De6t Service on$100,000,000 $ 6,893,797 $ 48.02
Total M&O+Debt Svc $ 23.783,149 $ 165.67
Revenue Credit $ 8.012,663 $ 55.82
Final Cost to Ci[ies $ 15,770,487 $ 109.86
Final Effective Cky Daily Rale (Includes Debl Service) $ 110
PROPORTIONED AMOUNTS
Debt Service M&O Revenue
Auburn 29% S 2,015,730 $ 4.938.407 $ 2,342,884
Burien 4% $ 241,888 $ 592,609 5 287,146
DesMoines 5% $ 342,674 $ 839,529 $ 398,290
Tukwila 8% $ 564,404 $ 1,382,754 $ 656,007
Federal Way 17% $ 1.169.123 $ 2.864276 $ 1358.873
Rentan 34% � 2.358 404 5 5.777,936 S 2 741.174
SeaTac 3'�� S 201.573 S 493,841 S 234288
ADOPTED MODEL: Prorate Debt, Prorate M&O, Prorate Reveune
Prorated Debt Prorated Prorated
Service M&O Revenue Final Cost Beds Rate
Auburn 5 2.015,730 5 4.938407 $ 2.342,884 S 4.611253 115 5110
Burien 5 241.888 5 592.609 $ 281.146 5 553.350 14 $110
Des Moines 5 342,674 S 839,529 $ 398290 $ 783,913 20 5110
Tukwila $ 564.404 S 1,3ffi,754 $ 656.007 $ 1,291.151 32 �110
Federal Way $ 1,169,123 $ 2,864,276 $ 1,358,873 $ 2,674,527 67 5110
Renton $ 2.358,404 $ 5.777,936 $ 2,741,174 $ 5,395,166 135 5110
SeaTac 5 201,573 $ 493,841 5 234,288 5 461,125 12 $110
2I10/2009C:\Documents and Settings\dhinman\Desktop\09-Council Retreatl02-SCORE\Financial Model to 2009 Retreat 2.10.09
I �rehmiosr�p=.:.;n R'.:.s:i�buclun Scheefule ^^
Si:r,qF larl
rn,p
Sar¢ma¢Gnp^
90 Rn'i�n;Efl.n.af..Cm•..�rrenl
a�.gn prr�lynnnl
W XY.'qM!F+IImi1�.CM[ ri
oh��a� .�.��.,
co a..�n.I rc
PumrlRoiea. . . �W o zpoiveu
��p.�K cno�NNli�p
_'_'_"'_'_ _ •"_ _ __ _ • _ •" _ � w-�n.�ro+�._ _" _ _ _ _ ' _'_ _ _ _ ___ __ _ _ _ "' _ _ _ _ _"_ _ _ _ _
� : &ee,�� I . .
� comr.no.a.am
4h ee��!al GmelMlan
COM�NCli0�1 Con�lru[ �315m�.-.:+�
oo�o� ,.ao,���b,���.,,,n -- —1
.��a�.�,o.
all.o•e�P'�ilunY��1 Nif
4cflOpaa�ryrlrvni lwY�'�L
aVrv �Ileiuliuc
Con�bvct�m II)m.+ninf
any SiG PacY�p�Oec�wnenls
mlbbWS�
Constrvuion e eomec�u�.nn
OPlion slw ev.yn piaab+y�uc:.o..
�Gra ingP�r p��nVNCo;p�elra 1
♦ fan['el,nn 1
2009 Citv Council Retreat
Februarv 12, 2(109
PSA BUILUING/ GSA PARCEL
ACCESS AND UTILITIES SEVERANCE
The Access and Utilities Severance Pruject fbr the Public Safety Annex Building,will complete the
severance oFutilities and provide a new access [o[he R.4 lcros of land deeded to ihe City ofAuburn by
the GSA. Lan6vage in the Deed from GSA requires tha[ the City provide a separate access and sever the
utilities from the remaining GSA properties along C Street SW. This requiremcnt involves the following
new construction;
• Fencing city property to separate it from the existing GSA faciliry.
• Completely sevcrina the existing utilities from GSA owned facilities, including power,gas,
wa[er, and sewer.
• Constructing a completely new roadway entrance to[he city property, crossing over a Boeing
owned railroad spur.
Estimated Costs
Road and Storm Coostmction Costs �435,000
Sanitary Sewer lmprovement/Reconnection Costs $22$,000
Water System Improvement/Reconnection Costs $275,000
PSE New Primary and Secondary Service $92,000
PSE New Gas Service $10.000
"'`' ` � TOTA�;ESTI1VfATED C0�7'S � ":�' '-$l 03�7 000 �
Although no specific plan currently exists for the use of the site, vanous purential uses liave been
identified. Duc to the existing high volumes of traffic on C Street SW,espccially dunng the afternoon
commute,access on to the street is difficult at times. Some of Ihe poten[ial uses could warrant a new
traffic signal to improve access.
Traf'fic Signal Installation Costs (if necessary) $37Q000
Public Works Departmcnt
Page 1 of I
.--__ _.. 1 -, � �
� � � � � �, Q ' i
� ��I �,
� I 1.20 ACRE POR710N �
- Of SAFEWAY PARCEL
I I
I j I I , �� �
� � � �
�5a B�� � t- �
, , I
_— — — , �
; I r
I j I i I _'-' —� CROSSING OF ? I j I .
�.� . BOEING RAllROAD ,�RwcE . �� i
; (1 I ` I ON'�.SAFEWAY PAftCEL :GRAGE .
t � �� � � � i '-' � . � l I
—� -— __
.......... �
c
�' I /����' _ �. � I
� l � �� �, '. .
�I��� � � pROPOSED 31TE ACCFSS R0,{p h— CITY
-- . �� `I�`—fl � CITY OF AUBURN � L'� �� AUBU
I PUBUC SAFETY ANNE% , � PAiCE
� � BODNG RAIL SPUR
� -�'— EASEMENT ON 3O� I
�� I..._ . SAFEVIAY PROPERTY �i o . � _ '+ � I �
_._ .
� � —� �1
�-�{ �� —� CITY OF AUBURN � � � � �� � U � I
PARCEL �� i � .
� . � �� ShFEWAY�ua � � �
. , G�RI:P�_: ���7i;
} .
. . •5'9/ � � .. :
._._. .__.. I / �.. �� �
We�fl
� � � ... IDNfR I
0.95 ACRE PORTION /
OF SAFEWAY PARCEL "� I I
CUT Of�F BY BOEING � �.,,, — ,.
� �� � RPIL :SPUR I � ` � � _ �.
• �
/
� ..� % I
.'
i �,
:� ._i l, . . . �� Lj/�� �I L� I� ll l_—�� �II ..
li; , � � � - � ---
.... '� (1 0.40�'ACRE POf�T10N ....��� n �'" '/ I/:�� ...— ��� SAFEWA P--�RCEL' r ....- \� I I
lJ �� OF BOEING PA(�CEL / � i ,
�` �' .
r,�
�I �., ,z;ss:../i . � � � �
;� �-' �' �
� I
�r.... s:� . �
. .... � -sa ,
. a�'`� - .. _ .
i li:—•-�_ � <:�� � � II I �. ` �j. .
� I
i _
I
i � 1 � r—: L � = I. i
� .._—_....
li i �
�m�F Public Safety Annex - Access improvements Project
AUBURN ���� M�
�vasnincro� RsNeed Jen 2008
2009 City Council Retreat
February 12, 2009
PROMENADE
1. The Dow�town Auburn Promenade Proiect would consist of a full rc construction of Division
Street from 1�' St NW/NE to 3rd St SW/SG complete with expanded decoradve sidewalks and
crosswalks, tcxturcd intcrsec[ion circles, street lighting, street vees, decorative poltcd plants,
modilications to a tral'fic signal system, tmd new water, sewer, and storm utilities. The
anticipated funding so�vice is a three million dollar Ecunomic Development Adminstration
(EDA) grant the Ciry applied for in 2008 and potcntial LIFT bill. The EDA does require a
mltdt.
The draFt streeescape perspective for Divisioi� Street is the concepmal plan and die cross-
section provided in your packcL This plan is the same one presented at d�e 2008 City
Council Retreat. NOTE: Pro}�ertv would necd to be purchased if construction occurs prior to
development of Division Street.
Downtown Redevelopment Infrastructure Rough Costs
Road Im rovamen[, �4.1�2.1 I5.00
Subtotat Streets S4,I�?,I I�.00
Sanitary tiewer Restoralion�lm xu��ci�irni ST-1�.79U.00
Sales T;�x 8.9"��� 57�.?7�.31
Sublolal Se��:er �9�1.065.:I
WeLer Utilitv Resturatiun/lin rovement S'_27?00.00
Sales Tax 8.9'7� �;19.99i.60
Subtot�l Water 5247,193.(i0
Stnrin Uiiliiv Im�ru�emcnt> ti I��I .uUn.UU
TOTAL CONSTRIfCT[ON ESTIMATE $5,511,373.91
En�=ineerine De artment Costs
Dcsi>n EnU. IS`%, 5826,70(.09
Ri�ht-of-Wav $OAO
Construc[ion Ene. 10"/„ $i51,13739
Connn�encY 20°�& S1J03,'_74.7b
Subtotal F.n��r. Dc L Costs `n?48Q118 '6
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $7 991,492.17
Plam�ing, Building,and Communiry De��artment
Pa�e 1 of 2
2009 Citv Council Retreat
Februarv 12, 2009
Assumptions
New Scweis on ]st Street SW/SL and on 2nd St SW/SE (8")
New Water on Division (12") from Maiii to 3rd SW/SE
New Water on 1 st St S W (12")
New Stonn on I�t SW and 2nd SW (12")
Underground power on block I D and I E
Relocate existing undergrou�d power on blocks 2A and ZB
Comcast, Qwest and gas relocation costs are NOT included
(Qwest has� major trunk linc running in the alley of blocl<3B)
New road consmiction ou the I'ollowing:
Division - Ist St NW/NE to 3rd S
1 st Stree[- A S W to A S E
2nd Su�eet - A SW to A SE
W Main St from N Division St to A St NW
1 st St N W hom N Division Sl to A SL N W
Thc above costs assmne right-of-way is dedicated as part of development of tlie blocks. If
the promenade pr�ject is ahead of davclopment then nght-of-way will need to be acquircd.
2. Housing and Demographics
• Density (population target PSRC urban ce�ter designation)
2007 Urban Center Density/Em lovment PSRC Tar�ets—Urban Center*
5.6 u�its cr acre 10 Units er acre
13 Em lo ees er acre 25 Em�lo ees er acce
3.07I Em Io ecs I5,000 Em lo ees
2,�79 Total Po ulation No total o ula�ion tar et
*Vision 30=0 designated regional growl'h center targets
Pro osed Master Plan
Po adatinn
Estimated Number of Ui�its 1,289
(build out of w-ba� cenler)
2007 Households (cun�cnt)* J,294
Total N.stimated Units 2,�83
Estimated Density 2,583/230 acres=
1113 units/acre
E�n�lovmenl
Estimated Cm lovices 5,750
2007 Lm lo ecs (cun-e�t) 3,071
Total Estimated Em lo ees 8,821
*Assumc tltat households=units (all existing units occupied)
. Whei�conccntrate high dens-ity'? Where retain single family residential'?
• Transit Oriented Developme��t
. WorkForce Housiiig
Plam�ing, Building,and Community Department
Pagc 2 of 2
West Side of Division between W Main St and 2nd St SE
.�
a
f �1
_—' _� � 1 5n �.-��
�> �
�� �� - ._ �,1 � 1
� � �
l _ _ _ � � ��
. _
I 20 feet I I 10 feet I
- - West Side of Division between 2nd St SE and 3rd St SE
.,
'' SS�`71. ,-
�
� J _ _ sa
i
_ � ti '
-- — • -- — R �— �- - — -- c. �;� /
_ S
T 14 feet 10 feet
Downtown Redevelopment/nfrestructure Rough Costs
Road Improvements 53,1��.115.00
Subtotal Streets $4J52.115.00
Sanitary Sewer Restoration/Improvement $845,790.00
Sales Tax 8.9% $75.275.31
Subtotal Sewer 5921,065.31
Water Utility Restoration/Improvement S2_7200.00
Sales Tax B-9°jo 519.993.60
Subtotal Water $247.193.60
Storm Utility Improvenierils !�!Il ill�
TOTAI CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE $5,511,373.91
Engineering Department Costs
Design Eng. 15% $826,706.09
Right-of-Way $0.00
Construction Eng. 10°i� $551.137.39
Contingency 20% $1.102,27478
Subtotal Enyr. DepL Cosls $2,480,118.26
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE $7,991,492.17
Assumptions
Fiber conduit and boxes(no(iber)from 1 st NW/NE to 3rd St NWINE on Division St.
Replace Sewer on Division Street(10"), Main Street(12"), and A Street NW Q2"and 15")
New Sewers on 1st Street SW/SE and on 2nd St SW/SE(8")
New Water on Division (12")from Main to 3rd SW/SE
New Water on 1s[St SW(12")
New Storm on 1 st SW and 2nd SW(12")
Underground power on block�D and 1 E
Relocate exisitng underground power on blocks 2A and 2B
Comcast,owest and gas relocation costs are NOT included
(Qwest has a major trunk line running in the alley of block 28)
New road construction on the following:
Division- tst St NW/NE to 3rd S
1st Street-A SW to A SE
2nd Street-A SW to A SE
W Main St from N Division St to A St NW
1 st St NW from N Division St to A St NW
n:\project estimates\Promenade 020609
2/10/2009 at 2:18 PM 1 of 1 h:\forms1fc016
� _ �r— ��
� __ � - � '— I�
i �'. ��,-
' <• �- ; �, � �
c�- �� � .. I ,- ,�/���-T �
,
rv
��
\ , -__ �'�7.�- �J ��, .�.'
/ - � � ^ �Q — i
� ♦_
,., � �� ���%� / 7� '{�'�`'____
� '-�\ � —'�� F--- ' �1 � �_ i �.
II i � , / � _ _ � � —I
� �.i
ti� I�
' '�t�,l
1 K
� 1�s I
��n, � �"�Y - �—a1 � � Lli_l: I T��I I�� �
�� �q �� �
i � � ��� � I �I � � -���i� �. ��1��%���i� �I
A
� � �
�
� r,
� � E �- � '
I � � ���� � , �`��
� _ �� �� i" � �
�
--:.3n ``; . .
il , ;_ � ,�?� s-' ��r..
�--=---i- _�'� `� , �f
�, _ zr< <: �. �-.��
i
�,�, • ,.�,.
�I , �r YrL �`�.:•
� �� � :
/ ��,I �:, � �''1�� �. S _ r�
`;� ��, ���2, � � � -
1 �
�f91,; ..��.I
�7 � i�.
� n
. � — ! _.;= '�.
� � �.'.'l
� r I �
\ C i � 4^ 'i �'`�"
'�I'' . H, .�' _ �1• '' �'t�.:
Y
l
� .
a: � � � I
___ �
� i
� \� I
�
�...fK�' .��'Y
ty a n I
E- L � � ""�'-'q�
�, ��`.,_�—,1 �..�� �'7L� • \
� i 1� 7�. �i,— ..
1 �'_ I � "',..'
cI F.%!"�`- :�Sli�� ,
T ���.� ���� - .. ,
��� •.�� � ' .
'�` � - ' a � ` �
. i
. 'n ����I
"i.-� r i� . � i
� � - j�
�`i �c .�,�_ C�� , i
�r _ K .i�
-fi - _ -+
CITY HALL PLAZA FINAL PRELIMINARY PLAN
PLAZA ELEMENT/QUESTIONS PRELIMINARY BUDGET YESINO/PORTION SHORT RANGE OR LONG RANGE �, SOURCE
Landscaping
1 '�Prune Trees $ 5,000.00 Yes Short Range In House
2 ISelective removal of trees and other vegetation I $ 15,000.00 Yes ' Short Range � In House
3 �move lawns -�- � 5,000.00 Yes Short Range I In House
4 Wew planting $ 50,000.00 Yes Short Range � In House
5 j Dry creek bed and"Rain Garden" i $ 30,000.00 Yes Short Range ��. In House
6 �epair and Replace Irrigation � 10,000.00 , Yes Short Range I In House
Paved SuAaces
7 'Resurtace separation stips on plaza surface N/A N/A
8 i Install pervious pavers _ $ 30,000.00 Yes _ � Short Range �
�I Remove and replace paving for interactive � I � I � �
9 !fountain and"rain umbrella" I $ 40,000.00 Yes Short Range
10 NEW: Remove and replace all plaza paving $ 100,000.00 Yes Short Range
SRe Fumishings
11 Install seating and tables/bikeracks/trash $ 60,000.00 Yes Short Range I
12 lnstall seat wali benches $ 40,000.00 Yes Short Range �
MOVED TO LONG RANGE: metal framelglass � � �
13 "umbrellas" Next page � Long Ran4e �
14 MOVED TO LONG RANGE: Install art pieces � Yes �ng Range
15 �,Relocated historical_plaques-by owner $ 1,000.00 Yes Short Range In House
. _ - -- . � .. . - � --- �
Sa(ety
16 Install handrail/guard.rail per code(Option A only) N/A . N/A
17 Remove handrail from wall; repair wall $ 500.00 Yes Short Range � In House
18 Install new handrail in center of stairs per Code $ 4,000.00 , Yes Short Range In House
Concrete Construction
19 �Demolish curb for Option A N/A N/A
20 Demolish curb for Option B � $ 5,000.00 Yes �� Short Range In House
Electrica!
21 �Install underground conduits and electrical supply $ 20,000.00 Yes � Short Range � _
22 lnstall li hted bollards ' $ 12,000.00 O iion Discuss with Ma or
1 2f 11/2009
23 Install wall mounfed step and ramp lights _ $ 6,000.00�_ Yes I Short Range
MOVED to next page: Install monumental light I 1
24 _poles and fia4ures _ Next Pa9e
Plum6ing and Mechanical �
I Install catch basin and connect to existing drain I
25 line $ 2,500.00 Yes Short Range-timed with paving
Sub-TotalShort Range(•engineering) 5 436,000.00 �
� � Sales Tax 8.9% b 38,804.00 �
Total $ 474,804.00
Engineering Costs' $213,661.80
TOTAL COST SHORT RANGE
Long Range-Scope of Work for Plaza and Extenor Renovation
26 Glass canopy at building entry $ 100,000.00 Yes Long Range
Redirect roof drains to new"rain gardens" on If dose to$15,000 then shorf term. If
27 northwest corner of building $ _ 15,000.00 Yes/Option I.more expensive then long term
�Color change to metal grid on exterior glass
28 _ curtain wall � 20,000.00 Yes/Option Possibly maintenance _
�Install metal frame/glass"umbrellas"3 inGuding � iLong range but priortize SE corner first- II
29 SE comer $ 300,000.00 _ Yes _ ���water um6rella separate out.
MOVED to previous page: Remove and replace � � '
30 all plaza paving Previous Page
31 Relocate flagpoles _ $ 10,000.00 Yes Shori range if in-house; long range if not
32 Install monumental light poles and fxtures_ . $ 50,000.00 Yes _� Long Range
33 Design and Install Art Pieces $ 50,000.00 Yes i Long Range
Sub•TotalLong Range(-engineering)�� $ � 545,000.00 �
Sales Tax 6.9% $ 48,505.00
_ total 5 593,SOS.OD �
Engineering- 5267.07725
TOTALLONG RANGE
Combined(Short and Long)Sub-Total with tax 5 1,549,048.05
--.-...__- -- -- ---- �
Estimated Enginc � � �� . � i �:-����.;�. � � Long Range
Design Eng. 15-�: _ - .--t $89A25J5
onstruclion Eng. 10% 547.480 $59,350.50
Contingency', _ 20%I $94.961 $118,701.00 i �
Subtotal En r. De t. Costs $213,661.80 $267,077.25
2 2/11/2009
2009 City Council Retreat
Febrpary12,2009 _
CITY HALL PLAZA
1. Exhibits—John Nelson and Hinshaw drawings
2. The Ciry Hall Plaza project would replace the courtyazd on tlie southeast corner of the C,ity Hall biock
with a new plaza that would serve as a centeipiece to the future Downtown Promenade and proposed
Auburn Professional Plaza Building.There is a proposed short range and long range vision. It is
anticipated that the Downtown Redevelopment Committee will be making a decision on the
concep[ual plan at their February ]0,2009 meefing.
The short range visions will inclnde thinning and removing existing vegetation,remova] of lawn and
installation of low maintenance omamental grasses,new seating on the upper level of ihe plaza and
also benches along the terraced steps,new glass umbrellas,and potentially a glass domed kiosk.
The long rangevisiop ezpands by improving the bdilding entrance to City Hall with a glass awping,
removing the flagpoles and reinstalling on the building roof,redirect roof drains to a new"rain
gazden",removing and replacing all plaza paving,and color change4o the metal grid on the exttrior
glass curtain wa]]. The new plaza would be designed to tie into the Promenade theme and increase
the amount of open space in the courtyazd for oommnnity events.
The anticinated fundin¢source is a potential LIFT bill.
Estimated Costs
PLAZA PRELIMINARY
ELEMEN'C/ UESTIONS COST
Landrea in
1 Prune Trees $5,000.00
- -- — — _
� Selective removal�oftrees and
2 otherve etation $15,000.00
3 Remove lawns � $5,000.00
4 New lantin $50 000.00
5 , D creek bed and"Rain Garden" $30 000.00
6 . R&Rlrri ation $]0000.00
Pwed Sur aces
Resurface separation strips oq
7 laza surface $5 D00.00
8 Install ervious avers $30 000.00
Remove and replace paving for
interactive fountain and "rain
9 umbrella" $40,000.00
Site Furnishin s '
Install seating and tables/bike
10 racks/trash $60 000.00
11 Install seat wall benches $40,000.00
Install metal frame/glass
12 "umbrellas"4 includin dome $300,000.00
Planning,Boildin"g and Communiry Departmen[ I
Page 1 of 4
2009 City Cuuncil Retreat
February 12,2009
--— - –_
13 InstalLart ieces $50,000.00_
Relocated historical plaques-6y
__ _ 14__ _ owner $1 000.00
Sa e
Ins[all tiandrail/guard rail per code
15 tion A onl $5 000.00
Remo4e handnil from wa11;repair
_16_._ _ wall $500.00
Install new handrail in cen[er of
17 stairs er Code $4 000.00
Concrele
' Construction
18 Demo cdib foY [ion A $1 000.00._ .
19 Demo curb for tion B $5 000.00
20 Install ram and curb for O tion A $10 000.00
Electrical
__ _. . _._ -
Install underground condui[s and
_ 21 electricalsu I $20000.00
22 Install li lited bollazds $12 000.00
Iqsfall ivall mounted step and
23 ram li ts. $6 000.00_
Install monumen[al]ight poles and
24 fixtures $50 000.00
Piumbing and
Mechanrcal
Ins[all catch basin and connect to
25 existin drairt line $2 500.00
8ub-Tota1 ShortRen e S7S7 000.00
Sales Tez 8.9%. $67 73.00 _
Long Range- - �-- - - � - � -�- - . . .�
Scope of Work for
Plaza and Exterior
Renovation
_ .. - -- - � �-- � -- - - - -- '
26 Glass cano at buildin ent $100 000.00
ReBirect roof drains to new"rain
gardens"on northwes[corner of
27 buildin $15,000.00
Color change to metal grid on
28� exterior lass curtain wall $20 000.00
. _ - -- - - -- . . _.. _- - _-. _ .
Remove andreplace all plaza
29 a4in $1OQ000.00
30 Relocatefla oles $ IQ000.00
- — - - - -- - - -
__ Sub-Total Lo Ran e $250 000.00
Combined Sub-Total $1 007 000.00 (short and long range)
_SalesTaz8.9% $89623.00
Combined Sub-Total $1096 623.00
Plapning,Buiiding,and Cotnmunity Department
Page 2 of 4
2009 City Council Retreat
February 12,2009
Engineering Department Costs Short Range Long Range
Desi n En . 15% $126,656 $164,493.00
Conswction En . 10°/a $82 437 $109 662:00
Contin enc 20% $164,874 $219 324.00
Subtotal En cDe t.Costs $373 967.00 5496 479.00
GrsndTotal S1198 40.00 stiortran e
sfiort range and]ong
$1 593 102.00 ran e combined. .
Assumations
I. Utilized costsprovided by Maul Foster Algoni and Public Works for the engineering'departmen[
costs.
2. Costs will fluctuate depending on actual materials(e.g.paving type)chosen.
Planning,Building,and Community Department
Page 3 of 4
2009 City Council Retreat
February 12,2009
3. Housing and Demogaphics
• Densi_ry(popplation target PSRC urban center designation)
2007 Urban Center Densi /Em lo ment PSRC Ta ets—Urban Center*
5.6 units acre ]0 Units er acre
13 Em lo ees er acre 25 Em lo ees eracre
3 071 Em lo ees 15 000 Em lo ees
2 599 Total Po ulation No total o ulation tar et
*Vision1020 designa[ed regional growth�centertargets - - �
Pro osed 1VIaster Plan
Po ulation
Estimated Number of Upits 1,289
build out of urban center
2007 Households. current * 1,29A
Total Estimated Units 2,583
Estimated Density 2,583/230 acres=
11.23 units/acre
Em lo ment
Estimated Em lo ees 5 750
2007 Em lo ees current . 3,071
Total Estimated Em lo ees 8,821
*Assume that households=units(all existing units occupied)
• Where concenUrate high density? Where retain single family residential?
• Transit Oriented Development
• Work Force Housing
4. Historic Preser4ation
• Carnegie Library
• Formgr Aubum Library
• Aubum Avenue Theatre
• 2 SFR homes on E Street SW and 11' Street SW
Planping,Building,apd Communijy Deparunent
Page 4 of 4
NOTES
i�1VO�NL 9_19At�L.�i1UYN5�
� . � �. . . .. . .. .. .. ._.-"__.: ---.-.�r . - . .
..� . •. � . .. � . . � �
__ .. . �. / � ... � V.`:. yAY..V i. v .
� / � ♦-... � .
4 $
4� �-
�. , . .. . ;y� 7. �
� , re � `, .�," �
�� \ �` � � -{�",_:2:
--� e xr ��� �
'�. '�'[ " I P �. . . . ♦.�.i
.%� :I,y{: II ' � � �t .�
.�; �.$., _
�s
, ._ .;#. n !_
,
;�,.,�, -
�
;.,,,.. , _ �
` \�:; _ ,
,.c_ �.�oGti«�a
_ , ., . :,�,.,�.,
� . . .�'�(.15 ONH .. • •(
..
r • 1 .
��\\\\� {'L
<CaQ \'. -I•
I ..��
� .��-P6NYxf4'y LGr!� ::�
ti • ' .... . . :: ( .
,.a . �. .... .... ---
� OPTION B: = �
„,A u� AUBURN CITY HALL E�E°E�'s
SHORT RANGE � sE..���� .��.���_,
%°o��` PLAZARENOVATIONCONCEPT-�.ery.r,a�9- EaR�rsuccEss �K'p��"` s�;��:��E�""E
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NOTES
�
�
. s�.v-:;x.:nn=.:rr,�:_+"�
ftl,�4 r.wYv::S . ' • '..
x:Rrt�
r..n.r �ou � .
_ � . . ._. .. ,_ .-__
• • 'V!'/SMllOR�+':M'n5 nR�C
- � • — - • • . _
, ,. ., :, . >
= j �-
,
� , �� � _ . ` �
♦; ,. � ..• ^
�, ��� .'
� � '��' . •
�, � � � ; , ' � � . t:,�:
.t�� ,
. �� � �� � �4—.
; , � , , r.� ,
� � ,v,�e, �� �
�,�1 � \ ' ��-I � ,.., , .., `� .r;;: ' �
1 . � I I.t=� � :.
;.
,,.,L.«w . ,��<,,: , . ,
*�a K„ti�,„.;.��;�.w«F� ,y. I
.
��::
y . _ 4,
1 lulf5 J ��
� �'{'IS�k.'Wx "✓f .
f ���
�... .. < i.r�.�-
y_.y( •.�•.. . ..
r .
.
..... ...
i. .� 3f1. YGF9u.4u: . .. 'rMe [�..
� ........... ....
........... ,i� . . ...
i�� ...... ...— � , 1 _
� OPTION B: � � � —
AUBURN CITY HALL E`E"`"'s
M A U L SHORT RANGE � sEmv,� a cur�aies
:°�"° pLAZA RENOVATION CONCEPT—Feen.,,o�o— "'""1N6 "�"`RFPi05E
�o�w EARLYSUCCESS ����K s������
I � � ,
� � � -0
� � I
� � !�
l
1
�
� � G =.. - � I.
\�\ � �� � J� �
�_j .�j
'� -�` � ' '��—! �
�� ,�1 ;I r�� ��
� I
l� "_�'� r�f�,!? i
� � �i y'� / ,_`''� j � '�� �i
_ _ 7;T;r,T,- ,�.�`.
r�f_�.
=�� — � L�ni
�� � �� � ��
;� ' �� =, �`� ��
I�� 4�� � � � L11Y � �
'T"�� � � .. `�`�T�Lf� ,
�, �
'���
, r � ,_ �---
�
' '` T �
� �,� , �
� , �� � �
. � _� , - .�
r_� ��:� _ r,-
y� �� . � I T','v� � 'r+ �-�� / ��\
,�� ���� �� ��
i I � r� � �'�� ;
, �, ' , �� � ���� � �
,�- _ �'�,
�' k, �� ,
` , ��'.' �" ��
I�i,`� C� � �.''�--�- �:=�i,� -'
�'�-- '� � � z 'l�a�''s
� �� ,� ��
�� � �
,
�� �i � r� � , ��
� �
_s �\
�7
1 y_�.- '
, �\;\�
.:�f�t I� ',: + �i � / �'r.
� � �..
,,� �� '�iC�, � � � � ��
f,
, ,� � ���
€ , ,
�'� � � �' �
,
�
�� �
� , ���.� `� � � �`.
��' � ���
CITY HAIL PLAZA FINAL PRELIMINARY PLAN
� ELEMENT/�UESTIONS PRELIM COST YES/NO/PORTION SHORT OR LONG RANGE FUNDING SOURCE
Landscaping .
1 Prune Trees $ 5.000.00 .
� Selective removal of irees and
2 other vegetation T� 15,000.00 _
3 Remove lawns $ 5,000.00 _ _ .
4 New planting S 50,000.00 . . _ _
5 Dry creek bed and"Rain Garden" $ 30,000.00 __
6 R&R Irrigation $ 10,000-00
Paved Sudaces .
Resurface separation strips on
7 plaza surtace 5 5,000.00
8 Install pervious pavers $ _ 30,000.00
- Remove and replace paving for
interaclive fouNain and"rain
g umbrella" $ 40,000.00
Site Furnishings . -
� Inslall seating and
70 tableslbikerecks/lrash $ 60,000.00
11 Install seat wall benches $ 40,000.00
Install metal framelglass
12 "um6rellas"4 including dome $ 300,000.00
13 Install art pieces $ 50,000.00
Relocated historical plaques-by
74 owner $ 1,000.00 .
Sa/ely
Install handreil/guard reil per code
15 (Option A only) $ 5,000.00 _ .
� Remove handrail from wall; repair
16 wall S 500.00
Install new handrail in center of
17 stairs per Code $ 4.000.00
Concrete Construction — - -
1 B Demo curb for Option A $ 1.000.00
� 2/10/2009
PIAZA ELEMENTI�UESTIONS PRELIMINARY COST YES/NOIPORTION SHORT RANGE OR LONG RANGE NDI G
79 Demo curb for Option B $ 5,000.00
20 Install�amp and curb for Option A $ 10,000.00
Electrical �
Install underground conduits and
21 electrical suppty $ 20,000.00
22 Install lighted bollards $ 12,000.00 -
Install wall mounted step and ramp
23 lights $ 6,000.00
Install monumental light poles and ' � � �
24 fixtures $ 50,000.00
Vlumbing and Mechanical � - — ——
Install calch basin and connec�to �
25 existing drain line $ 2,500.00
Sub-Total Short Range y 757.000.00
Sales Tax 8.9% S 67,373.00
Long Range-Scope o(Work Por Plaza and Extenor Renovation �
26 Glass canopy at building entry - 3 100,000.00 -
Redirect roof drains to new"rain -
gardens"on northwest corner of
27 building $ 15,000.00
Color change to metal gnd on
28 exlenor glass curtain wall � 20.000.00
Remove and replace all plaza �
29 paving $ 100.000.00
30 Relocateflagpoles $ 10,000.00 �i
Sub-Total Long Range E 250,000.00 '
Combined Sub•Total E 1,007,000.00 (short and long range)
Sales Tax 6.9°/ $ 89,623.00 �
Combined Sub-Total $ 1,096,623.00
Engineering Department Cosis Short Ranqe Long Range
Design Eng. 159� 5126.656 � 5164,493.00
Construction 10°� $82,437 �109,662.00
Contingency 20°-6 5164,874 5219.324.00
Subtotal Engr. Dept. Costs 5373.967.00 S 496,479.00 -
Grend Total S 1,198,340.00 short range
short range and long range �
5 1,593,102.00 combined
z 2/10/2009
Auburn Environmental Park
and EP Zoning District
In 2008, the main ac[ivity in the AEP and EP District was related to a one new business
moving into the District and council acceptance of the Recreation and Conservation
Office (RCO) grant for design and construction of recreational amenities in the AEP
(trails. birding tower). The following are details of the grant activities in 2008.
AEP RCO grunt funding
• Birding Tower ($I 12,SOOK grant portion and $112,500 city portion): to be
completed in March 2009.
• Trails: not yet designed or constructed; expected to be in second phase of project
(2009/2010) and location would have to be approved by ecology and curps. Costs
unhnown at this time.
• Remaining Funds: grant funds —$460K; City match remaining $460K + $� 12K for
work currently under construction completion.
EP lnierpretive Center Update'�
The followi��g are opportunities to consider for location of the interpretive center.
Funding through stimulus package:
• Industri�I BoIY Services ([BS) at the north end of Glay SL.
• Malek nroperties— 320 and 340 Western Ave
Ste s CosCs
Property acquisition . —$1? million (IBS only)
• —$O.R million (Malek onl
Development of IBS Interior remodel to LEED standards,
including demonstrltion greenhouse on
roof—$550,000-$700A00
Development of Malek properties Demo and construction uf conceptual
desi *n $500,000-$1A00,000
Total (IBS onlv �1.75 - $1.9 million
Total IBS & Malek $3.35-$3.7 million
Questions of'the council:
• Do you stil I want to construct an Interpretive Center or wait unti I later'? I f not funded
by Stimulus Money
• Do you want it to look similar to the conceptual design in your packet'?
. j � � .a :r; t',�` at 7 iK�- r::.-_r_.:
� j F z,�?� ,�£� ,. I ;_ _
�� I J r � � �� . � ,�� _ 4 Potential EP
l2 *
ti , �;�. ,,,, � Interpretive/Greenhouse
� �4:, , �) �}����F. � ` �"`,��#� ��.�- = Center Sites
����. ' �� ., � ���h� _ jk , �. _ �'{- ...,�
_r � ' , .. ' ' � <�x1 f — - �`!.
�� l� l, . _ �' � _ � a� � _- �' ...
� �
t.j I . s"' � � " i� " 'uY'elA
' .'� S /� �� !�{� �1•� t ; ; �`,� . _ 1I3S Building(in[eriur
/ � _ �.. ..� .-n 1 �
{,�`, �'� ,.�.�� � �,�. "� - remodel unl��) 1.00 acre
� ... v� i�1- . r .x
F' v �y �' a �
{ �:'.�� � � -;i � ,�„�y�-�-�=-z'� Prup uth �.(would
�� /f�� � �- �� '; � �� '
,- � � ; � � rcyuire somc e o a
z,�" �� � . � `
��'f ' �� � �� � asses 2.24 acres
'Jp� � �tN� 'r"�`}'' (� �L . � � I I
'�x - ' � � �'' � � operties!u ' and R'
i �4 �' >
' l .r„ z� .. '�� '! _,�_- �� ��:�.8��+� 61ain SL(wo ' c demo and
a-- ''
�� � ' � "1y �,,, - � � �` "`. _ sit sment) 1 53 acres
,, <�` ' � �' � ��+r� = ,�c � �I ��,.
.iY� 1`YF "w ._�� ,' �_1 �.� t N'. . #�. S/" �r� j
�,� �+ �� i'+ :� „�.. ,c .�__ „�,1 "`�. " y 3. . �ialck proper[ics on Westcrn
� � A V' �
_:L, s�- ti -�,� ��• �i '� . s ' r ��"' Avenue(�+ould require demu and
"' ,wt ';=..j'' j�.♦,� �� F �`'���.,� � '` � � fr.f- �� site assessment) 1.5 acres
„t',���- ��ef .�1 � y F �� s , � �� c�
� �'7� ,��� � + � a , �,,,;�� ���, �� Nonc of thcsc sites contain N�c�tlands
�' " ,' � ,�� � �
� .,� a � ,
j, � e�
�`°'iM �_. . . j��I- -', ' �-� r ' :Y ., . ;� R -r�`�E. ,�
'�4 ( � $zt � .�,
,. , •± l► �
. + _ � s
�, _X � �� �- f��� � : �-
�� �. �n��if �.-n"�1
! 3 �4 �m
d`���r-) iy
� '�. 1 . � I r h't '. 19E�V� . � 1 �. .
� 1 R '� % � A�� ' " � . r` j n er re �e reen ouse
��+� � �'� " �� , EP I t p ti � /G h
Y� 1
1 _73� �
'>` '�f ��� � � .. � � r Center Sites
- ���i
��� � s ��_.. i` <��.--
, t �i � �,�4 f � � 1i�[. �
, � •`�` _ ' -
i '+� i t
i�;{' � ;�
*�y ;r '�� ` � � - � ,- .
��i�d i 1 ; �,: ..} � F' _ .. FJ � .
- � � 1/1 '' � � � ;� � , -- ��`.� IBS Building (interior
'> . a i l. �� s. �.� t,��, ': v� _ � �
� � ` � ' -� ' remodel only) L00 acre
; / , '" ;:� „'
:�.�lp ..� -.,T.!-in�;r`- �i �� ` ' .`x
� �
.x� �`��� ... • ����� � ��` t4 ..t-a.w I
� � �� �7
: f � �A ��� � i
�
% % � ��� �•�'" � � � • :� " � Malek properties on
'r l� `k ���+"�'�`����"� r f � � � � : � � � ...4 j � �1 � � i Western Avenue (would
�,x�1 � ti , '�' ,� _ � : < -
, ,-E , . , "�, � _r �' ,� . �_ require demo and site
�: 1 * z �."�`;" � _� + j��` ;1` r`"_ assessment) 1.5 acres
r � M v�= � � :�" �, �"
y r,r --+ `� : � ,� x. S��
x . . ,V � . �s,
� �. . � '"�_ I •
� �. > � s •K
-� � ;,e�' , � .f--- -�^�`'� ..� ���� "; �i � �� ��° Neither site contains
�"^ '�� �� � - ���F `-��'* ''�f ' d " � • wetlands or other critical
.,#k� r . � ~ : � . � � ��.,�;..� � ' �� �,�; �
---� ; .� :. � __'., , areas
�--
,..-•;� .z� . . . rr , r '�
. �,�. . � �iJ . � +� � � y...
"�j1} ' '�' h �e{' _ � 'G�. � �'"
��� ..:... �� : �� d+'.4.,.I — F Y � ��y .rv.` :
� . i - �iY [ f 1 f-� '�i �[ �[
_�'f��'•u_ � �` yy l < <��"1k {��_
� � ~ .� •Iw� �l��' ' ����� : ��ii./
1i;4�`;�,=
Y ``n��� ..t� , ��`�:- �. �` f ` '
_ ,: . -- -
�_ �.
w -.,�:-�,,._ �.
`;, i , ,� �
�.�,�S'' •.� �' �' , -_ 1 �
� � , , (
�ne e�li. . _��� r���� r� , ' Y� �1 _ a - .- �A,F _
� yti I
� . F' f . .�n�±�t� r} �'�:��`, x `3�Q� , .. � � �; �/ '^ �.. �r.c vc. Ij
lJC�_.� r ;... ) �' �.t� j5`4 LX � -� � � ;�� > -� . ^�� ' � 'r v�
_ ,- � � � . � � 1�i= :�y'�` �I � L( �F'-`,
1 y: �:, t �,.r � t .: ` ,.Y a r . ��7 t ,,. -t � i' r.�.
n `. �..4 � � •:3 f� � � r 40 `� � . +l.111'.tm�w�w,•"{/!n) _'s�
�r , � :i �. > �, -�� „ _ � ?>-� ��
�.�� � ti � �, :�, �2�„ -� - r -j
r ty ..,r ,� r f ;�� v y�l� � p� � -� � jh � R � � S _ � �
r �- . �,,• � . a , {. 1�i � � :.,.�1,.�� �� _ �, � ,.�.�� � � �,�* t.� c. . �� I .
Efi "� : y . i I ..� � � L, � y;.
�% r...ij� .� �. ?k'� 'i�� i .ss�P ���- � � _ r t � .ti.��- (li±. � �,:II . ��� ,> �
. . � a� �i,ir, ;_.t i } it i�•. � �� rLL�y� ,���7U=--,+ n _.— . y� �y �
�� � ' � 5 1 ��b k� � ���1. ��I-`- ' � � . .
'.�-� 81 i�� n , � � .
� �•�:� �• � � � �'`�'`' t�r1�'W�'bl d� ��a��ft't�'4 rt�}4�,11�d���t� i; - � � !} F� � 1 � '.
; =��; .� : , i . y
!�� ..F„ y� -R_ �,. , r , 4 �,' � ��Jj� '� �-
� d ?�I� �a:v..��� � . . � ' �� � 1� � .�� r ' , "Lz'r
•* " . � �T ,N �
� .? � .t 6a ti . � . . _ 'W � .:.�
�-.��� F� -� ��J _ . .j'.F� ' -- .� - .. . ..
-;T: Y t�� ��Y .
� 's. . �� �� � ..,
" ' � 1,� .�
f' �� � .( ';�„�ii.' ,
_ � 1�?_ .f;�, =: � ..c::.� _ � � ' �l�'
- -- �
�.��,.: � � _. .. _ ���z,� �
Conceplual Design Rende�ing
Interpretive Center Conceptual Design �
�
�� I
� fAUtiURN '
�
-�� Environmental Park Distrid Zoning AUBURN
.,�� --�
� '
� /, I
G
• -
I
I
I I
,�
�
��
I
I
�I �
� �
�
I ,
�� � � � --
J//� r
� ��� � �
� i,� ,
i, l' �
,�,�r , � _ ���.
� ' _
;�
� `
� ;
� �
L ,
� �
� � _ � � �
�
, y _
:�. � � - -.
_-�,--� __ - � _ � --,� �
;
r i �- 7- � !���� � D
;- � � �
�'� �� � ���� i � � �� -:�� ������
, _ �
i , -��, . —
; .,�n���, ��������
� �� :. �
_ _ �
�ii ...... �Yi _ � .� ., .
�
.,µ4,....m..wr..,.. � wM�..u�w . � ..�„mm.�.a� r . .N..�.�,,..
.,,�.,.�.....,.,..,.,,., ,� .,��,.���,._... + ,,...._.,.,.a_. I
� ,�.u,�._���..�,.m„�. � �,,.�.���.,.� .� .,�ro.�..,,.�a ��
AFZTEI���►L/C�LLEC�'OR PAVIEIV�'��9T PRES�RVAT�O�I
FlD'�I����ONC SCH'ED`�D�E
29 miles of arterial/collector streets (out of 77 miles total) in need of work (PCI < 70) at the beginning of 2009.
) Pavement patching work on 2.3 miles of streets: Esrimaced cosr
2��9 8�,400,00o TOTAL COST
) Crackseal work on about 8 miles of streets: esrimared Cost 51;500,000
s�oo.000
) Overlay work on 1.7 miles of streetsthat were patched Estimated Cost
2010 in 2008 and 2009. S�,aoo,000 TOTAL COST
) Crackseal work on about 8 miles of streets. esrimaced cost 51;500,000
Stoo,000
27 miles of arterial/collector streets (out of 77 miles total) in need of work (PCI < 70) at the end of'2010.
NOTES
• Recent Lea and West Hill annexed streets not included.
• Utility impact costs not included.
• Streets that were patched in 2008 and 2009 still require overlay work to complete needed pavement improvements.
v�onoos
Page 1 0�1
— —� : — � � ��� i�1 " \'� ,"" —� : N
,... . . � C
-�_.�/ .... � � ' �t�_1 �'T t.( .� ��1
— — I ����� � �.;, �_�,�5�, ,���� �..._
� � i , �,,� _
� — I ..._ '�/� � I I _ 5__ - � �....--
�`. ,_ _ I . — _ � .
P �� € �... I..�.. I � ,
._ y
-�_� . � 1 '� � � �� , � � ' �^
� a _ -€r
F ��J .� �� 'l��l�i'l!/ ' . ` � � -
i ` �
_ ' � ` ¢� , _ �F�
_�71�L � 1'y-��� e � " � ��,�. i _ pai J, i �/_ � F,
��i � � f � �. l �r�
.,�� . , �� � =I � � i�
i� '' �e f 3 - r �
_.� fa�F R s •, r—. � p
13 �,.. �..—.I: y , , r-.-9� �_- �,*,� �
i
� � � s+� ' �� r� �— 7 � �
� � ���.� I �� � i � � ,� - � i —
i ; � � '•a, � � ��v
� d � � y:
r � 9��;
� . � 7� �1, i -�::�-+' .� �. � �r ��.i a yi I-, � � ;
��� . � °'Fr,. "� i � � z .. S I r� r a.
� � � �
� �� 1�7. ^� � t. i . 0 � ��:,; I C� . 1 �
�� ' . . '�' i 1 : �i _ e] �.. i � �' �� :
— � i_ , y 1 y I�� 1
..�rf � �I .� � . �d s� . � �i I�'f �'��p �:��E � � .���j .+_� �
- � � .���,��� � � I '�-I"� � � I � {'� � � � e
1 79].L" . � � 5�:. �
I 1 � � �� p, � � �
�In � q � �l � .
�m.� ( , :�I 1Y1 � �.� �
.–
�l •� � �'�r� �l
�� _ � �� � :� ��" d�` 1��5,.
� �
� g �-s_� ,. �.a . ,n" IT',
"_, � '��� �l
� � - :a a�� F
: �" _
� _� �/� � � �j � i � dl
\ � i P ,.�'��"� � F i � ry_
. n,.. —� F � r .. ,� y - \ __
t e �, .�� ��:... ��-' � �x � q N.:�' �€' \J _
�e �;\- EI s ; rIP��� —9�
�
� � _1 _a�_ �, \ '� ��i � ° � , _ _ .
. 5 qlll Ijl"�.: �� l q.l..�
f �
I L.MY �.� �� � I ' ��I� I ll ' P I i I.–�{�#
y 9• i
.�
a . .
.`�'�'�l �� „ I \
I��
_ � .x,� �a ' ' . ' � � � — __
j f ? I �� � S 51����� / �� � ,'
, �,
, �� .
, �
. � e �
�j,-, q� � � _ , .p,E : � 7 I
�e I e' �_� a '1�- ` �'' 41.. j�:'\I i+ � q °I
� � _� �'9G� ��. �i e: g . �� �� .
�_� .i�'��.�� �— � � �.�,�5,,��� - � J_� � � �
-CI_ r�; � ���,� � °- a �.�.; � �� u �� r �j i
�r-- �
, ; ' � �'�t�, � ,—d-.., f�,iU
P � / � Ilt �` �b�4�::. � � �� �R q��'�
�'^ ,.�. � -' � � .! i � �I-, � ��� _ 9__ �
�_ I_l � ir1���iC-:.' '-'M � � �
�
m , :. �1<<a �� ��. � - � � ��J ,�i-
, r
1
� � � � ��� ��. �— - 1 �7 _� � �q
_ ..,�_ � � k� } s
_. . �_-�� �..n.. �-9 _.. �— � �_� � —.����-..���� ��� �'��� \
ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR PAVEMENT
PRESERVATION PROGRAM
LEGEND
� � 200]-2008PAVEMEMREBUILDANDOVERLAYWOItKCOMPLEfED
� � 2008PAVEI.�NTPATCHWGWORKCOA�LETED �� �,� .�.,� .�.,�
0 2009PAVEMENTPATCHQJGWORKPIANNED p� P� c'v g��
1 � ARTERIAL/C04LECTOR STREET IN NEED OF WORK AF"[FR 2q19 p �3� �,� +�?� S�
I__ I DATAUNAVAILABLE(STREETCURREN7IYBF.MGSURVEYED) �
SCALE:"�ia6-J.100 fat
* *
c►r�roF_' � Memorandum
� Engineering Division
WASHINGTON
Date: February 9, 2009
To: Mayor Pete Lewis
City Council
From: Dennis Dowdy, Public Works Director
Re: M Street SE Grade Separafion Project— Schedule and Funding
The design of the M Street SE Grade Separation project is currently underway. As the design
progresses, the City continues its efforts to fully fund 4he project. Curcently, fhe City has both.
City and non-City secured funding co.mmitments of$7.82 miliion and tentative funding
commitments.of$4.6 million totaling$12.4 million of the $22.4 million tbtal anticipated project
costs. See the attached white paper for details.
The following is a summary of the current status of funding issues for this project.
• All funding partners are currently indicating their funds may only be used for the
construction phase.
• Freight Mobility Strategic investment Boarii (FMSIB) has $6 million allocated to this
project but requires that$300,000 of this be spent on construction prior to July 1, 2011.
If this is not met, FMSIB could pull all funding.
• Due to federal funding requireme.nts, in order to b.e allowed to begin any consfruotion
activities, the following needs to be completed:
o design,
o all environmental permits and approvals,
o and ali property acquisition:
• In order to expend $300,000 in construction by July 1, 2011, construction work rriust
start by May 2011.
• We have already phased the overall project by moving the Auburn-Black Diamond Road
Bypass to a second phase allowing a shorter enviro,nmental process for the graiie
separation project. Additional phasing of 4he oyerall project(design, environmental
approval, right-of-way ac;quisition and construction)would not be supported by our
fuhding partners.
C:1Docurrients and Settings\dhinman\Desktop\09-Council Retreat107-Arterial Streets Preservation
Program\10C-MEM_M St Grade Sep 2009.DOC
1 of 2
AUBURN * MC)RE THAN YOU IMAGINED
Boftom Line
To keep the projectmoving towards the 2011 construction start date the City must close the
funding gap for th_e design, environmental, and rightof-way phases.
�r�- .". � ::,.� itk' �t�rt ����i�lll(.j1I�,��"�� „n� uT0 '��?q{�'y�T QII;^�T7 �w d �.
ce a �
� E��{e . k"� '.rr�ai"`F, �, p ,S : .r ��_ � .k_ =5 ri���,.
� ._.. n� . .. �,...— µ"a�-na"='a`'' a �.�a3•�"::k ^',...,".�.;....�-n ,a�+�. §"BF�r�C1�8CIHC� r�ur 3,.t�
Design/Environmerital $ 400,000 Mid 2009
$ 200,000. Jan 2010
Ri ht-of-Wa Ac uisition $ 4,600,000 __ Feb_2010. _ _ __
Once these phases are nearly complete, it is anticipated that FMSIB, TIB,and the FAST
partners will contribute $10.6 million of the $15.4 million in anticipated construction costs,
leaving a $4.8 milfion funding gap which may be filled by addi4ional federal grants:
G:\Documents and Settings\dhinman\Desktop\09-Gouncil Refreat\07-Arterial Streets Preservation
Prog�am\10C-MEM_M St Grade Sep 2009.DOC
2of2
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU 1MAC;INED
CIIY pF �'��e
�- URI�R�1�T
.N . - � � .
M Street SE Grade 3eparation f �' wAs���"�,�N
Auburn, WA
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Proiec4Uescriation ____ _ _ _ __ _ _.___
This project will grade separate M Street SE and the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway's (BNSF) Stampede
Pass rail line by lowering M Street SE at the crossing, , ' -
widening the road from two to,four lanes, and adding bicycle ��+��� " �
lanes arid sidewalks. *• � 1
This project is located on M Street SE between 4'" and 6'" "
Streets SE in 4he vicinity of the State Route 18 (SR18) .,w, �"��'"
overpass and the at-grade BNSF rail crossing in Auburn.
Proiect Need
This projed was ident�ed in 4he 1997 Aubum.Stampede Rarl
Trafirc Impact Study as necessary to mitigate the impacts - -- - - --- - -
from BNSF expanding operations on the Stampede Pass rail M Street SE-Northbound View
line. The study identified that 16 to 24 daily t�ains may
operate on the Stampede Pass line. On aVgrage, one 6,500
ft. train can be expected to operate on the BNSF line during ' �
each hour of the morning and aftemoon commute. At full � � ? �`
speed, each train will block the intersection up to 5 minutes at �
„.�,
a time.
This project ha§ tieen identified as.a Freight,Action Strategy � `
(FAST) corridor project. FAST is a multi-agency coalition
dedicated to improving freight mobility throughout the Puget
$ound Region and mitigating the impacts of freight
movemenfs upon local communities.
_.. ..,
.,_�..,,
Proiect Benefits
• Remo4ing the conflict of rail and vehicle traffic
• Improving freight mobility for trains antl trucks M Street SE-Southbouod View
• Improving emergency vehicle access
_ . — ---
• Increasing the capacity to accommodate2030 traffic
volumes
. Improving air quality through emissions �eduction M STREET GRADE SEPARATION
from waiting vehicles Project Visualization
. Providing non-motoriied improvements - "
• Reducing neighborhood cut-through tra�c on
residential stree45 �� I ti
• Improving safety (Project will ensure 4he safety of fhe �
53 daily school bus crossings:) -
Cifv of Aubum Contacts
Jacob Sweeting, Project Manager, Ciry of Aubum- �
253.804.5059-isweetina�auburnwa.aov
Carolyn Robertson, Governmerrt Relations Manager - ,� �'
253.931.3096-crobertson(rDaubumwa.aov � , ' � %m��, r�'���� " i�
4 z�§ �1 "t�
4 ;�`�y 's':.
� k� '��` e:,r.m � 3 .�;. +l
January 2009 -1 -
CItY()1� .`� a%��,wM�
��U �RN
WASNINGTON
M Street SE Grade Separation
Aubum, WA
Proiect Viainitv
w -
Schedule nueuRy �
nlGn
SCnOOL
Preliminarv-En4ineerinci ,:M IN S7
ti
Pre-Design Report Completed Feb. 2003 `�
Design Oct.2008-Dec. 2010
EnVironmental Jan. 2D09-Jan.2010 4 �r E
_._. .__,. ._._.... BU G70N OR H R RR
ROWlBrooertv Acabisition Feb.2010—Feb. 2011 T s
Construction May 2011 -O.ct.2012 y ProjeCt
- . _ � . - _- - _. . — .__ .. Locatlon
�
y�'A y i
G,p `
� �
H 5T SE �'9�TMCA
FundinaStatus �a� �ro�
n R. �
��unii�ng5oyrce;��.Anticiated.,�„��Secured� <,,.�..,,.,�,,'..;� .__`���;.Cor�?roer!��;,d�.�k�,��..» Gwtti..ut.;'� ,`rr'
..�..�,.. u ._.. ..� _ .
City of Aub:um $1.70 million Design and Environmental Funds induded in Prior
Years', 2009, and 2010 Budgets
FY08 Transportation $0.12 million Design and Environmental Funds
A ro riations
F.MSIB $6.00 million Construdion Only, $300,000 must be spent by July 1,
-. 2011
BNSF $�.�0 million Construction Only
er FAST MOU
Ports $1.50 million Gonstruction Only
. �er FAST MOU ._ _
TIB $2.00 million Construction Only
Additional Federal Unknown Unk'nown Likely to be for construction only.
Funds
Total $4.60 M $7.82 M
Fundinq Need PerPhase
�' y��p � � � Y=a '' � � � Pro�eeted �Secured:& �"'�'�°` 44 r -� � ��" �+�.rt �; �
"'''�5 ``.t' 8 r � `� �2t@S r� ft,� � 7 �AOZIC�p atC4� x � � tFI1Rt�1 �7 1 # � i_
",��sowia� � p'� ,�+' :�v �l att `xatk. A a tP r�k a�.i at��iQ$'� a k� '�"i� i � � wy�x �i' '�G 3 �
+'g �n �i.f�,�u��t y�� v �g y'+ i,-'�yn i �€�"'1 v a r 9 � i.. C" : �,ocu��i t s � ��r E x `,y�� y�k �h�ati��°R'� ��r��
.�x.amu�.i�.. 9..... i hd.u..F .s� . �se:..� ..t�. P. FQ��D� �s! s w ..r�r. �+,n 'Y�.n.�s u .-N4� ,1� i
Design and �078 to 1/10 $2.4 million $1.8 million $0.6 million
Environmental
Rigfit-of-Way y�0 to 2111 $4.6 million None $4.6 million
Ac uisition
Construction 5111 to 10/12 $15.4 million $10.6 miltion $4;8 million
Total $22A million $12.4 million $10.0 million
January 2009 -2-
*
cirvo� * k Memorandum
Engineering Division
�
WASHINGTON
Date: February 10, 2009
To: Mayor Pete Lewis
Gity Council
From: Dennis Dowdy, Public Works Director
Re: Truck Route Revenues
_ . _
In 2006 when we obtained pavement rating data for the City arterial system we hired a consulfant
to estimate the costs to bring our futu�e tr�ck routes up to atiove a pavement condition index
(PEI)of 70. Realizing that most of our system had never been designed or built to a TNck
standard;meaning that the underlying base is inadequate for supporting heaVy loads,we asked
the consultant to segregate the responsibility for upgrading the base from fhe final overlay once
the base upgrade is completed. The net result in 2006 dollars was$25M.This estimate was
reviewe:d and considered tiythe Citiiens Task Force as the portion of obligation that the Freight
Industry should pay for impacts to the system in its Report to City Council. The consultant's
analysis is attached on pages 2-4.
Preservation of our Truck Routes is financed out of ttie 105 Fund. Current annual redenues
9 , . _. . o �. . _ _ _
comin mto the fund are$1.SM from the 1 /o utili tax. Council is also curtently considering
approval of a Door Tax which would bring inan estimated additional revenue stream of,$1.2M
annually. Thisamount would pay for approximately 50%of the$25M that is related to freight
impacts. The city would have to pursue.regional, state and federal funding ro help make up the
deficit. Our discussion arriong other Valley Cities was the rationale that vie shouid not seek more
_
than 50%from local businesses since their businesses support regional commerce. The current
estimate based upon 50%of the funding needs'to bring Truck routes up to a Freight standard and
an inventory of eligible properties and dock high doors indicates an annual fee of approximately
$284 per door would be required.
Page 1 of 4
Financial Model 4o Determine Cost to Upgrade Aubum Proposed Truck Routes
The first step in the firiancial modgl development was to determine all streets in the Aubum
_ .
nelwork that were subject to the Proposed Truck Routes. All Proposed Truck Rou4es to be
included'in the analysis can tie seen in Table A.
The neM,step was to calculate the current cost to fix each street segment on the proposed truqk
route based on its 2006 pavement condition as derived from th"e Ciry of Aubum's pavement
management program. A current cost. per square yard was used to break the sections into
different pavement condijion categories. For this financial analysis the following City ofAubum
Planning pavement costs were used: ,
For anysection of pavement with a PCI between 100 and 70—$3.25/S.Y.was used,
For any section of pavement with a PCI between 69 and 50—$15/S.Y.was used,
Forany section of pavement with a PCI between 49 and 25—$30/S.Y.was used,
Far any sectlon of pavemeM with a PCI between 24 anH 0—$52/S.Y.was used,
Why the differenge in costs for different condition categories? ITcosts more to fix those streets
that are in poorcondition than fhose that are in very good condition. For instance, any segment
which had a pavement condition index of 70 or aboye was multiplied tiy $3.25 per s:quare yaPd.
The common treatment at this point in the pavement life is a seal. Wh_ereas, a segment which
was between 25 and 50 was multiplied 6y $30 a square yard, etc. This treatmenY is a heavy
oye�lay,which reflects the more expensive work needed to bring fhe pavement up to a very good
condition. TFie key component of this step was to identiiy what the current cost to the City of
Aubum would be in order to bring all of these sVeets up ro a very good condition at their cuRent
usage level.
Table A identifies each street segment with its2006 PCI and the current cost to bring fhe section
up to the Very Good Level. The resultant amount that fhe City is "responsible"for would be the
current cost for each proposed truck roufe. The total current cost for the City of Auburn was
$8,517,899. This number is what the City would have to spend on each of the listed sVeets in
order to bring each section up to the good.catego:ry(PCI 100—70).
After arriving at a current wst for each segment based upon the City of Aubum's planning
estimates a total truck standard upgrade cost ih 2006 dollars needed to be caiculated. Using
recent information from the C Street SW reconstruction, which tirought this street, up to the
desired truck standard upg�ade in the City of Aubum, a cost of$86:43 per square yard was used
for each of the listed sections on the proposed truck route network. This resultan4 cost is.the cost
to bring each proposed truck route listed in Table A up to a Truck Standard Upgrade..The totai
cost to bring all of the proposed truck routes Iisted in Table A in Aubum to a Truck Standard
Upgrade is$33,649,850..
The last step was to fnd the difference between the current condition and bringing ali the routes
_
up to a Truck Standard Upgrade. This number can be arrived at by finding the difference
between what the Gity is currently responsible for and the costSo bring each proposed fruck route
up to a Truck Standard Upgrade. This difference is$25,131,950.
Page 2 of 4
TABLE.A_
Current Truck
SVeet Nama Begin Loeation End Location P� Sfantlard Standard
. . . _ _. _ _ . . . . . . . .
Cost Cost
. . . _. . _. . _ _ .. .. _ . . . . .
iSTH_ST NE A ST NE(ES) D ST NE(ES) 85 $79,904 $529,326
_ , . .. . __._._. .-.._ .._...-. -
15TH.ST NE AUBURN WAY N(ES) I ST NE�(WS) 78 �$6,321 $168,097
iSTH ST NE �D ST NE(ES) ' AUBURN WAY N,(WS). 85 $15211 $404,521
-._.- _........-:._. . __..._-_- _.._..__._-__. ._
15TH ST NW BNSF RAMP(WS-BRIDGE� BNSF R4MP(ES-BRIDGE 69 $23,735 $136,761
- ..JOINT)._....___-_..__.__-__- . JOINT
BNSF R4MP(WS-BRIDGE
15TH.ST NW C ST NW(ES) � - - 59 $132,430 $381 537
._... JOINT�-_-_ . ..................__..'
._..._._- ...
15THSTNW �SR167RAMP(ES- UPRR�RAMP(WS-BRIDGE 59 $237,690 $684,785
____..,.,____ BRIDGE JOIN JOINTj - � - �
15TH�ST NW UPRR R4MP(ES-BRIDGE C ST NW(ES) 85 $15,084 $401,750
� ,JOINT) _ ........... .__..__.. -__ �
UPRR R4MP(WS-BRIDGE UPRR R4MP(ES-BRIDGE
15TH ST NW � � 80 $3,802 $101,104
.JOINT) JOINT)__.... ...___..._ .___...________.
__. .___ ......._...._...
iSTHSTNW BNSF�RAMP(ES-BRIDGE ASTNE.(ES) 83 $15,870 $422,038
----.--, JOINT) . . . -
. _ .__ -_--.._._...._ . . ..__-'__-
iSTH:ST SW(EB) PERIMETER ROAD(WS) C ST SW(WS) 4 $335,712 $557,992
......._..._.__---__-__-
SR167RAMP(WS- � SRI6TRAMP(ES-
15TH ST SW(EB) gRIDGE JOIN BRIDGE JOIN �� $37,093 $213;732
..._.. ___. .._... _-___-___.._. ._._
SR 167 R4MP(WS-
15TH ST SW{EB) WEST VALLEY HWV(ES) gRIDGE JOIN � � 8�06�392 $176.836
_-_-_ _ ..__. _..._-__- ._...._ ......... ........_. .......
15TH:ST SW(WB) C ST SW(WS) ���� PERIMETER ROAD(WS) 3 $336,336 $559 029
..._-__-__- ... __ _"__ �
iSTH ST SW(WB) SR 167 R4MP(ES- SR 167 R4MP(WS- �� $15,840 .$91,270
_BRIDGE JOINT , BRIDGE JOINT
_ . __._ ._...-_..._._ _..._..._. . . .......__._ ......................__-.
iSTH ST SW(WB) SR 167 RAMP(WS- �� yyEST VALLEY HWY(ES) 30 $103,723 $172;399
____ BRIDGE JOIN
_. .-__-._.
17TH ST SE AUBURN WAY S(ES) R ST SE(WS) 0 $243,822 $405,261
.._-__-_-_..._-__.. __.....
___.___ ...___:___ ....._..___-___
41ST ST SE A ST SE(ES) � WIDTH CHANGE(GURB 0 $171,889 $285,699
._.,,,,,, END/HYDRANT
_...._-_.__- ..._____ .___..._....._ ....__.____' . ..._._.-..___-
� WIDTH CHANGE(CURB
41ST ST SE END/HYDR4NT 350 FT EAST OF�D ST SE 0 $128,613 $213,770
.__. .... ......._.._. . _-__-._-_..__..___..-_...____ ___._.___-_
AUBURN WAY N 1 ST ST NE(SS) ���� 4TH ST NE.(SS) 64 $79,567 $458,463
_.. . .. ...._ .__....,_._ �..:....._._. ....._.-___--__
AUBURN WAY N 30TH ST NE(SS) �� 37TH ST NE(SS) 82 $44,714 $1,189J04
.._._._______.__-_________.
AUBURN WAY N 37TH ST NE(SS) 40TFi ST NE(SS) 85 $17,765 $472,426
.............. ......... ._... _... .__. ......_.......__- _. ._-... _......... _.._ �.......... ..............
AUBURN WAY N 40TH ST�NE(SS) 42ND ST NE(SS) 78 $15;405 $409,678
_..... -..._:- -
AUBURN WAY N 42ND ST NE(SS) 45TH ST NE(NS) 59 $89,550 $515,987
.......___ __.___ ........... ._ .-....._ _.-_-____.._ __. ___'_ .............. ._....._...__..__.._'
AUBURN WAY N 45TH ST NE(NS) � D ST NE(SS) 75 $94,410 $543,990
_.....- ..._-._ -___.. .__._.. .. ...-..._...- '__.;__ . . _.
AUBURN WAY N D ST NE(SS) 52ND ST�NE(NS) 69 $157;758 $909,004
. ._. .. _ _......._.____�____....__._.......__-_..._ -
AUBURN WAY N EAST MAIN STREET(NS) 1ST�ST NE(SS) 80 $5,708 $157;809
....-__. __._-____.._-._.. . _. _._-...._- __-__-_ ..__....__ ........ .___...
AUBURN WAV S 2ND ST SE(SS) � EAST MAIN STREET(NS) 69 $89,570 $516.10P
� - . .-'---�--- �
AUBURN WAY S CROSS/4TH ST(SS) 2ND ST SE�,(SS) 78 $16,204 $430,921
.._... ._.__ ._...._.__. ... _._____ ...__.___..._-..
, AUBURN WAYB WEST BOUND SR 18(NS) CROSS/4TH ST(SS) 85 $6,512 $173,187
. __-.__.___ ._ . _ .. _. .. . ..-.___._.. .._._-__ _.. ......... ._ - .
8 STNW 14TH ST NW(SS) �� 16TH ST NW(SS) 39 � $262,606 $436,481
.__-_._ __ ...._- .._. ....___ .._____ .__- _-__- ___-__. .....___._.
B ST NW i6TH 5T NW(SS) 30TH ST NW,(NS) 70 $302,527 $1,743�159
-...._..-......-..__-___._ -___......._. --__.__--
B ST NW 30TH ST NW(NS) 37TH ST NW(SS) 88 �$18,197 :$483,941
- .'- .._--..-___..._ _-_,.--
B STNW 37TH ST NW(SS) 42ND ST NW/NE(SS) 67 $68,600 $395,273
. ... _ :____ __. _
B ST NW 42ND ST NW/NE(SS) 49TH ST NW�(SS) 0 $295,776 $491,614 .
......_..___ ..___.-._ ._...__ .........._ ..._ __._..._..__.
B ST NW � 49TH ST NW(SS) S 277TH ST 88 $9,817 $260,925
-__ _...-____-_. ,.. ._._: . _-... ...-'._-- ___._- __..____ _....___.._'_-
C ST NW . 3RD ST NW(NS) � 6TH STNW(NS) 21 $303,091 $503,772
-.--._'-_-_.._-. ---.- - ._.._....__ .__._...... _______...
C STNW 6THST NW(NS) iSTH ST NW(SS) 12 $860,860 $1,430,849
--.....-- -------. .......... . _ �_ .. .,..._. ........_. ___._..-.-.-_.:-_--.
C ST NW MAIN ST(NS) � 3RD ST NW(NS) 16 $232,777 $386,803
- - ____-- - - --. _.- - - - --
C�ST SW 15TH ST SW(SS) BTH�ST SW(SS) 79 $27,939 $742,837
....... ........ _.. _ ._._.. .. __...,..- .._-._ _ _........... . _.._. ........ ........
EAST VALLEY HWY S CIN LIMITS� LAKE TAPPS PKWY(SS) 4 $170;583 $283,529
Page 3 of 4
2006 CurreM Truck
Street Name Begin Loiation End Lowtion P�� Standard Sfandard
Cost Cost
EAST VALLEY ACCESS RD
EAST VALLEY HWY �SS� WIDTH CHANGE 84 $25,3W ,$673_002_
---- ...._... ---' - .
-BNSFUNDERPASS
� EAST VALLEY HN/Y WIDTH CHANGE ��__ 84 _$13,806 $387;155
� ACCESS�RD NS
__ __-_ ___.... _. - -- -_ -
EAST VALLEY HWY BNSF UNDERPASS LAKELAND HILLS WAY g,y .$�4,872 �$395;504
...._ ....._...... ACCESS RD.�NS) ....... tss)--......__....._,_...-�--
.. .. _ � -------....._ ______ . ..........__. .._......
LAKELAND HILLS WAY WHITE RIVER BRIDGE
EAST VALLEY HWY 84 $22,008 $585,275
-- -- '�SS�---._._._--... _.. DECK NS�.
WHITERIVER�BRIDGE WHITE RIVER BRIDGE
EAST VALLEY HWN 96 $6,030 $160,356
� ,_DECK.(SS) ,.,, .____, DECK(NS)___
EAST VALLEY HWY ��TE RIVER BRIDGE CITY LIMITS 84 $1,429 $37,991
DECK(NS) ,___ �
.-........... ........_-_- ._ .. ._.. ---- _..--- ....._._- .............-----...
HARVEV RD 10TH ST NE(SS) I ST NE(SSp 83 $125�,280 $721,863
. . -...__..._.___ .___'__ � �-
HARVEY RD BTH ST NE(SS) 70TH ST NE(SS) 64 $76,G63 $440,582
. _.. .. . _..,_ . .. ..__-- _..... -_.- ..__ - ..
HARVEY RD I ST NE(SS) AUBURN WAY N(SES) 0 $222;560 $369,920
_-__ _ ...-._ .. .-__.,-_ . _......_.- .-.-..___
M�ST NE 4TH ST NE(SS) BTH ST NEjSS) 25 $326,040 $541,918
� _______ .__-.._.. ....__ .......... -____ ____..-_ .______..._ ......_._._....
M�ST NE EAST MAIN�STREET(SS) 4TH ST NE(SS) 48 $152230 $438,575
_- -._
M ST SE 12TH ST SE(SS) STH 5T SE(SS) 54 $193,453 5557,339
`_.__-'.. . ___. . , ..._ '_'_�.....
M ST�SE �4TH ST SE(SS) EAST MAIN STREET(SS) 78 $109J20 $632;207
� ._--.. �_-: _ _ -
_.___ - _-. -.
M.STSE 8TH ST SE(SS) � 4TH ST SE(SS) 36 $161,880 $466,376
M$T SE AUBURN WAY�S(NS) 12TH ST��SE�(SS) 58 $156;640 $451�,280
.__..... . - .___._. .__._ ._....._ ...._............
S 277TH ST AUBURN WAY N(ES) D ST NE(ES) 88 $13,709 $364,562
. .'-_ _ �-_- _ _ ....... ...
S 277TH ST D�ST�NE(ES) G ST NE.(ES) 85 $13,548 $360,298
....'--__-.._- .._....__..�__...,.._,_.,.,___._.___ -. _-- ,._._._..'._
S 277TH ST GST NE(ES) WEST BRIDGE-0ECK 85 $43,222 $1,149,442
WEST VALLEY HWY N 11TH ST NW(SS) iSTH ST NW,(SS) 43 $308,520 $888,846
_-___- . ....._ . ..._. . . -- ---_-.___-_______
WEST YALLEY HWY N iSTH ST NW(SS) � � 22ND ST NW(SS) 51 $313,560 $903 366
.._... _- _-........._ � ' -.:_'__.-_.
WEST VALLEY HWY N 22ND ST NW(SS) �� � 26TH�ST NW(SS) 69 $103,410 $595,848
WEST VALLEV�HWY N 26TH ST NW{SS) � 29TH ST_NW(SS),_ _ . 61 $95,310 $549,776
.__.. __.__,___ w_______ '-'.�
WEST VALLEY�HWYTI 29TH ST'NW(SS) 37TH STNW(SS) 73 $211,860 $1�,220,737
..- --.. � . -__-..__-_ . -__- - -. .
WEST VALLEY HWY N 37TH ST NW(SS) S 287TH ST(SS) 50 $176,550 $508,641
.....____ . ._. _ _.. �-_ _-.--. - -..-_.
WEST VALLEYNWY N KNICKERBOGKER DR(SS)� 11TH.ST NW(SS) 62 $94,975 $547,246
_.:�--.-...__... ............._..._.. _-...._.__ ._ .
WEST VALLEY�HWY N WEST MAIN ST(SS) KNICKERBOCKER DR(SS) 47 $160,347 $461 959
- _-- . :...._._ . . ___...__ _- __. ----__
WEST VALLEV HWY S SR 18 WB RAMP(NS) WEST MAIN STREET(SS) 34 $255,&l0 $425,236
TOTAL E8,517,889 E33,849.850
Page 4 of 4
DOOR TAX ESTIMATES
The City inventory found there were 421 non exempt properties that would be subject to the Door Tax .
����'R����- �`_� �.:���_,
ks��t��� MUL�I�I�""�.-��t:"� Ee t G �.,4.at� � � s �; �.:�a�,� � .4 � ��+� .s��,.�,''a ` %t z�et� �,'�'�, '� � FAC�NG�.
)d �f` � 3- T t �. 3 .�J Y ,� 4.'—.c�4x'€'' � k
P!N;. 4 �TENA�13�, USE BU5INESS�W�thE($) __��:_,"^ ;, ,, �,� _. _�CK� �RAILROAD t i��1/f� 'RAILVJAI';=r.
5561:00? 24:00 �B:00 , :0.
�w'o..�.. �'r.'�i�xx�:.` a�°� „fi� ;. >��*�y���°� �t" �.,�t. 3 � �, _ ,,�g=_,,'���� TOTAL DOOR NON• AMONG 422
QCEMPTADDft€55�� -� �, o`,PA�E�, �-�"B�151NE55 "'��`" � �OFDOOR EJCEr�pr 5247
, .._s4 =�. ___= . �� .,. .� _ _ �_�3 _ . :_. �., ��� � . z ADDRESSES�
ASD (En� GRATIS:DOORS
ASD TOTAL' - v; � FEE'DO.ORS ; >.;
P9 GSA 247
P9 BNSF 2
P10 M&0 14
P10 PARKS / M80 9
GSA
TOTAL. �
GOAL: To collecY 50% of the needed funds for freight reliant industry. The total need is $25M over a period of 5
years through a,series of bonds�paid back over a i5year period. To bond $25M over 15 yearsrequires
$2.SM/year�fordebt°service. 50%of $25M requires a debt service of$1.25M per year.
ESTIMATED FEE PER DOOR= 51.250,000.00
4403 Doors - Sz84.00 per poor per Year
*
cmr oF -* '-�� * Memorandum
� � WASHINGTON
To: Mayor and Council Members
From: Dennis Selle, City Engineer and
Jeff Dixon, Principal Planner
Via
Dennis Dowdy, Directo�of Public 11Vorks Department
Cindy Baker, Director of Planning, Building and Community Department
CCe Department Directors
Date• February 9, 2009
Re: Retreat Discussion of
NE Aubum/Robertson Properties Group anii their Au6um Gateway Project
__ _ _
Main.lssues/Decisions:
1) As a result of discussions of the project at the 2008 retreat,the Council agreed to a financial participation
level of approximatety$1,000,000 above the standard participation methods/mechanisms(such as provided in
code)towarcls public infrastructure improvements(roads and utiiities)for RPG's Autium Gateway Project. Ariy
ciry financial participatlon would be predicated on"..,an agreeable dgVelopment agreement with the proposed
footprint, and provided that construccfion of the first phase begins on a date certain, with plans submitted by
November 1, 2008" (from Summary of Retreat). The proponent has been communipted this commitrnent.
Does the Council still desire to financially participate at this or any other level?
(P/ease consider the curient 100-year FEMA /►oodplain moratorium currendy in e/fect related to
endangeied species issues and the FEMA proposed revision of Ehe floodpfain maps;both of which
may comp/icate development]
2) By Ordinance No. 6183, passed in June of 2008, the Council conditionally approved the Comprehensiye
Plan map 8 tezt changes,Zoning Code map&.text changes and Special;Area.Plan adoption. The appmyals
were condi6onally approved and do not take eifecf until subsequent.adoption of the planned action ordinance
and deVelopment agreement (DA). These remain the major outslanding land use approvals for 4he
_ _
project. The developmerrt agreement cannot be completed until additional environmernal review is
completed since addkional errvironmental review is needed to set foKh the infras4rueture
improvements associated with a project that is revised 4o include phasing.
Page t of 5
AUBURN * MORF TFiAN YOU IMAGINEb
Brief Historv:
• In 2002 Aubum was approached by the owner of the Valley 6 Drive In Theater, Robertson Properties
Group(RPG)seeking redevelopment of their site.
• The Ci.ty signed a thre�party agreement between Robertson Properties Group (RPG), the Ciry and a
private consulfant to prepare an environmental impact statemeM(EIS)and the various land use approval
documeMs for the project. The developmeM, known as fhe Aubum Gateway Project, consists of
redevelopment of the drive in theater site and nearby sites tofaling 59.2 acres. Because the applicant
wanted to maintain flexibifity to tailw to future market demand over an eMended 15-year development
period,theapPlicant ident�ed 3 different development scenarios asfollows:
Laiid"Uses Altematne 1' „ t sllltemative:2: Altematrve 3`Reta�l : =f*re�Creii"`� ` ' �°
'� „" Reqil and Offiee Retail a(Id ReSldEilt�l�w� ��eR1�Ylil� a Y �""�
, . _,
� . F. �
_..�__. ..� . �c � � :.]-�_.o. . ... � _i_, . . . , �,.,�>S .,... 4 ! .. �t'., w. .':'�u`°�:�
. , .�_ . �z.. .+s
Office ft.600,000 gross§q NA NA p'�s���ar`e0a���� 4 ,
��"ua� s�;�.�a�t���`�. .
Retail 200;000 gross sq ft 720;000 gross sq ft 360,000 gross sq ft '?Up`ta�7L(1�000�mss��;
�
;�flowarea:,� ' �:
� � ,x � ;�
�
v ,�.� :�v_„a� � ,..;i�
Multiple NA NA Up to-500 units �Up to 50A dwelUng �
Family rrU����`��,,��(�� ��,���
Residential ��� ��#�`i`���`����.�;�,`"�i"�.
;�,���? r�f'�.."��Y3"+4v���w..�f'.:
• Ttie EIS analysis indicated the project coultl consist of any of these three altematives or combinations.
The project wouid be constructed over approximately 15 years. The scenarios represent the maximum
development potential and possible impacts.
• The Draft and Finaf E1S was issued in 2004 and while it was appealed by a neighboring property owner,
_.
the validity of the EIS was upheld by the Hearing Examiner. Copies of the EIS were disfibuted to the
counpl. The EIS provides analysis regarding the impacts of the project and the improvemenis needed for
the projec[as a whole:
• Since the time of the EIS issuance, the City has been working with the developer on formulation of'a
development agreement. The development agreement was specifically requested by RPG: The latest
draft of the development agreement was prepared by the City and is oonbn"uing to be refined and
modified. De4ebpment Agreements are autliorized by RCW 36:70.170(1)and provide:
"A local govemment may enter into a deyelopment ag�eement with a person haying ownership or
controi of real property withirt its jurisdiction.A deyelopment agreement must set forth the development
standards and other provisions fhat shall apply to and govem and vest ihe deyelopment, use, and
mitigation of the CeVelopment of the real properry for the duration specifed in the agreement, A
development agreement shall be consisterrt with applicable development regulations adopted by a local
goverriment planning under chapter 36:70A RCW."
Page 2 ot 5
AUBU� * MORF ThiAN YnU IMAGINkn
RPG's Pr000sal for CiN:Revenues:
On December 10, 2007 RPG provided a proposal for property Max and sales tax revenue accruing to the City
based on the three phases and the tryear development period. Again, the City has not accepted the
revenue proposal so,at this point, RPG§proposalfinformation is serving as a 6asis for discussion onlv.
A summary of RPGsrevenue proposal is provided in ihe following table:
'�BV211LL2:.5.d4ifG@i �n �I� �zY82Y a OI'II�If18� � Y931's1 rJ :s: � T0�,�� d t, t�4.,'.
penod : k ° ' ( ' ,:
_,t ' �
RPG's estimated retail'sales $1.97 per sq ft $'2:22 per sq ft NA
Tax revenue per square foot "
Compariso`n to estimated NA NA - $1:11 pe�s:q ft --
Super mall sales taic revenue
per square foot-based on
Ciry's experience
RPG's estimated retail sales $246,330. $1,598,605. $18,325,881.
tax revenue(gross)'
RPG's estimated $1.263,320 over total
ConsUuction$ales Tax life of the project
revenue * based onRPG's
construction cost
estimate
RPG's estimated REET and $44.160. $446,617. $3,952,900.
Property Tax RevenOe "
' The numbers are based on RPG's estimated time of completion of phases, tax rates and categories of
stores.
Main IssueslDecisions:
1) What is the city's desired level of financial participation in the public road and u6lity oonstiuction needed fo�
FtPG's Aubum Gateway project above the s)andard participation methods/mechanisms? The Council
previously agreed to a finandal participation level of $1,000,000 above the standard partiapation
methods/mechanisms. Does the Council still desireSo financially participate at this or any other Ieve11
❑ What additional informa6on if any,would be needed by the city to make a decision?
❑ What kind of assurances, if any,are needed from the Applicant related to the projecYs
future revenues?
❑ Are there certain factors,such as corrimitrnents for certain specfic anchor tenants ttiat
the City wants as prerequisites in order to financiaily par6cipate in the road and utility
construcdan needed for the project?
Page 4 of 5
AUBURN * M<)RE THAN YOU IMAGINF.D
• A point of dontention between the City and RPG delaying the development agreement is the financing of
Uie public infrastructure (roads and utilities). Resolution of the financing of the infrastructure has been
complicated by the fact that the EIS did not analyze any phasing of the development So, wifhout an
analysis of phasing,there is no iMormation to detertnine what iMrastructure improvements are needed for
less than the total development. Additional environmental analysis is needed to evaluate the project
consbvcGon in phases. Recognizing thisiimitation,on December 10, 2007RPG provided a proposal fw
tFiree-phase devebpment of theAubum Gateway Project. It is n'oteworthy tliat RPGs proposal consists of
all retail; withou;offioe and rriultiple family residential uses. This all.retail land use is within the scope of
what was sWdied in the EI$;so new en4ironmental review is not required for this purpose.
• In NovembeY200T RPG purcFiased four addi6onal paroels totaling 11 acres located west of ttieir cujrent
hqldings.
• At the ReVeat in February 2008 following discussion, Counalmembers spoke in favor of conVibuting
$4,937,477 for infrastructure upon:an agreeable developmen(ag�eementwith the proposed footprint, and
proyided thaCconsVuotion of,tFie first phase begins on a date ceitain,with plans submitted,by Novemberl,
2008. The approzimate$1.1 million in excess of the"curreM city participation of$3.7 million would come
from cumulative reserve funds.
• Ma[oti 2008, RPG providgd revised phasing proposal, including phasing of infrastrucWre improvements
and including the acquired proper6es. (See attached Exhibit B,as provided by RFG).
• By Ordinance No.,6183,.passed in June of 2008, the Council conditionaliy approyed tFie Compretiensive
Plan Ma & text chan es, ionin"
p g g code map & tezt changes arfd $pecial area plan adoption. The
approvals were conHitionaly approved and do not take effect until subsequent adoption of the planned
action ordinance and developmeM agreement. The approval of the Special Area Plan allows mul�ple
family land uses only'rf located in the upper story of a multiplestory building the first floor of wFiich conTains
separate.commercial.uses such as office or retail uses.
• City adopts Ordinance No. 6219 on December 8, 2008 extending the 6meframe for adoption of
developmeM'agreemeM and planned action ordinance as originaliy provided:in Ordinance No.6783. The
timeframe.is extended to August 31,2009.
• City adopts Resolution No 4416, establishing a partial moratorium on accephance, processing and
approval of devetopment applications within the floodplain. Neady haH of the original 59 acres and
acquired 11 acres are in the FEMA 100-year floodpiain. The moratorium was subsequenpy modified tiy
Resolution No. 4442which amends the moratorium to allow deyelopment,of the properry portion ouGside
the floodplain,to allowboundary line adjustrnents and to allow enJironmentai rev'iew forareas that indude
floodplain.
• In Fetiruary 2009 RPG signed a contract with a consulfant to conduct additional environmental analysis of
• The 3-part project phasing(inGuding transportation analysis of each phase)
■ Adtli6onal property acquisitions
Page 3 of 5
AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINF.D
2. The Council conditionally approved the Comprehensive Plan map&text changes,Zoning Code map&teM
changes and Special Area Pian adoption. The approvals were conditionally approved and do not take effect
untll subsequent adoption of the planned action ordinance and development agreement.
O Are there certain fadors, such as commitrnents for certain specific anchor
tenants that the City waMs included in a fidure developmeM agreement.for the
project?
Page 5 of 5
AUBURN '* MORF THAN Y�u innnciNFr.>
! h..s s:� .�
� I � �. w .r ; Sa � � r� �
, � � �� :
� •,
< < Q A�E�N �.
� � � � . K .. IR�.
. �� I�J't�'��, 7—Yn����� � �-/�-�� � a e
� �____��J1� u �+� f .
'°,.�
� � w♦ V .� v ' .
�'� Is d �--L----�-L � i ` .J ,
sis �� .�� ti"• �
,« V� .Q
�, .
N��'P acate �.._�p_�� K '' /` __
, . ,/��
tUl 4 . � �L�Mq4� .qf � i.._�'1._-+�S.r.-�K- � _ " , �~�__
. , _ ...., •\
•�.' .
_ ��
w . '.�'
� J � _ , �
� ----- --
. �—��'—�� $
, �'� B-1
� " 4---
� t � �
,,ti "` VJ Y � �
. �
\ u< J-� � �� ..
\
� \�\ ♦
4 \\
• � � $ tt�—u_ —y, � y � �
� QL r
�\\� � L 11-�-.tt..��-71--�1 7�
,� ` � ���9 ,-...
. .. . �� . .�1� •
� —Traffic Signal 9 =v� � � � � ��
—Improved or New Road' �� �zia L,iA
— —Private�Drive � �'�'
. �� � �JL--IJ' . �m � � � .
iMbVb �
%{�
R1. �.�` Auburn Gateway
Y l Y iFf
TremporlqllopSo�utiuns,lna Subarea A-G �Auburn wE�l
�.r y�F
r
Exhihit B '
.�-.o 1�-�— +W �� � � r
.i� h— rt .._JI "�'•T . Sm r} a,k � � sr iM�°° � " ;
�i u u L
s�,^" —�� ,, �1
,� ,
.!� � ��_� �ra�••
� . �� . �. . ' . �� � _ . . .
L �r"�1 � ,��,.-` Q �e
.a...t rt R n n...�t i� f .
R^ Ir---IY`�_.—I� u /JE_ p •�
a}as� ',7 x �� � � \J. 'v
Q �` r � �`
ps�wd � �
M 5L5 . . , ,,�"v� ./
I .�l
1. �� �4'
1 f� M1 i
• � N°^�p acate �--=w—;. u � K ;''/`'. –
. ,
� - �• ' ! - ' �---""
flH 4 . ldGei4 'pY . � ..,____
w n �N ,_,_. ,.
,,. . .� µ �—���� ....._........-� �
� ' •�.l
.. � _
�� � # 4�—�L'�'J—�1 „ �_"'�-�
�,�`�, 1 '"' B-1
'�` � CT� ¢��.
,`�, .,. ,� � �
l\� A�t W Y tt�
\'..� \��� I. uc Y . � ��Y . _
♦ � �
� �
+ �� �; tf h tt 11 !1 � '
�'�—U'�"� �
�` F.. .R—.l1---.`� � �
t # ���q
'� �. q �
"� —TrafficBignal D xy,..�
_ � � � � �� �? :�.
Improved or New Road �,u G�
� — Private Drive � � n
� � ���� ���
em ,ag
.� � �
�we+w k�nis
__�__ •
. . . �. . .��. .__ ..�
�p�s �r� Auburn Gateway
I!all� ,-�:
TdmpoNllooSolNwns,l�. S�ubarea A-�. .Auburn WA
�,;,�r,:
M,i Exhibit:B
SAVE OUR STREETS PROGRAM
FUNDING SCHEDULE
21 miles of local streets (out of 83 miles total) in need of work (PCI < 70) at the beginning of 2009.
Estimated Cosf
) 2009 administrative costs. gttz.000
) Overlay 0.9 miles of pavement focusing on streets in the Estimared cos�
2009 downtown area. sasa,000 TOTAL COST
) Design costs for 2010 SOS Program. Esrimated Cosr $2,200,000
$150.000
) Overlay and rebuild 1.8 miles of pavement as part of the Esrima�ed Cosr
Les Gove Neighborhood Improvement Project. S�.soo.000
� 2010 administrative costs. Esrimaied cosr
stzo.000
) Rebuild 1.0 miles of pavement focusing on streets in the Esrimared Cost TOTAL COST
ZQ� Q downtown area. 5�,355.000
Estimated Cosf $2'2�0,���
) Design costs for 2011 SOS Program. g�5o.o00
) Overlay and rebuild 0.5 miles of pavement as part of the Esrimared cosr
Les Gove Neighborhood Improvement Project. 55�s.000
17 miles of local streets (out of 83 miles total) in need of work (PCI < 70) at the end of 2010.
NOTES
• Recent Lea and West Hill annexed streets not included.
• Utility impact costs not included.
zi i or2oos
Page 1 of 1
l, \ I ,
ii I
. i� II. .�' � . . '... _.
� � � I ;:. . r i . . .. . ..i .
.. , ... �" I �1 ..� I . �� .� .... i •.�.,
S�
� . �1 ��\
.. . ' r `-� _� . �..
� I u _
. . _ I... .. /. � �� �
- - , /r�, ' L_ �V1 �
uY
I I . ��.P .. I �,
�,. . 11 : . . # . .
� II ._1 F�
� � '� _ ,� � _
,,
r ����� . � ,
�
..,:
� � -�,�� ;
�, �� '�,� � - ,�.-�
�
; ,
, ,
, � .
__ � ,
� '
, ,.
�,
. . l .. ;
. , :�
� �� �.
.
, _.
_ ,.
, �
, . ,�
� ..... .
� _ � -
. �.
.. _ �,,
�... f �,� � �� ;..
, ., .,..� . . ..... �il .
,... I � .. � -� ' ,; �
� �
e
,..�J � I� �. - - = _-
. �� �
.. � �;, � � � �- _ _ �.
,�
`
� � „
� � � ; � �� . �
: � . __.
,.�. j :, r. t , _
,, _,
;�- �
, - ,.;;
. . �' � ` , l - �
'3 :l4 �I �: � ( ��
. ,. � _. �Iti�y :tr7v � l.w ' ' \ I
�\
'� r� li=i. � .� _ �
. i y �, . , �'.
� '� . �
�r � , . — " � A
•. .r !l
. . . Y" ` ' _ . .� , 4 .j R , ,I y � . � �
�� ` ,. . ;�_ �� � � '_. .. � �''. � : 7 � \
I _
1 3.
; ..
. . �. _.-� . . '� � . ' _..
'
.. � . I .,�., . .�' ' a ..._ `'� ', .ti, i ... ;.
SOS PROGRAM �
LF.CF;tiD
� 2oo3-zuuxrnvr-_�teN�i�nruovemi:Nrwowccomvi-rruo
2W9PAV[MP.\TIMPROCIfMP.\TWORRPLANKHD
� LOCALSTILI`.ISTINNIIDOIV+ORHAIIIIi2fN)9 Fi. ot �•"`` c•
� DATAl1NAVAILABLE151kffTCUit1<IhIIYBLIN(i51iryVPYP.D) u ��� v� m� ti�'�
Z�
[CALL- �.in�'1� l.lU'If�z'I
CIIY Uh �
A-B Street Corridor Connector AUBURN
Auburn, WA wA�HiNc��N
Proiect Description , �� -
�- �, � �
This project will connect a major north-south .-- - �� "
corridor by constructing a 1.47 mile missing
link that is part of the 3.5 mile A-B Street �;r,,,,� _ � "
corridor, which begins at the Aubum Transit , .-- � : �
Station and terminates at S. 2771b Street on - - � � �
the northern city limits. The project will consist * �•-�v=+k'� `
of a new 3-lane and 5-lane road with � `F
sidewalks belween 3r° Street NW and 14°i ^��
Street NW. It will align with the existing B * �, z
Street NW and A Street NW on its northem " x „�_
and southem termini, respectively. '�'°'" '`" " �
e�r.s
; ". . � . �-- �
Summarv of Benefits � :� -
;� R ,
+ Promotes safe, inter-modal travel by �, � �� /'�,� ks,wl',�• �,��� �I
linking three grade-separated arterials . _ � * I, J�� �` � ,�,b��_:,, ��
from the northem city limits to the Auburn � 5 � � , * �, , {,
Transit Station - a regional transit hub r ,-_; ^�+I� *� � '%��` � �� �,Mi * ' ,
served by Sounder commuter rail and p � � * �1�'""�il+ �wi�� ,� * ,��,� M, �I���'
local and express bus service. � * ; � wri� p � � �" s��,� ' � .il i�, ,,� .
� � �„ i � W � I� :
�s
t i e�� ai1� i . 6 i o .1��r 6rxvl,f i �I 1-.
+ Part of a comprehensive downtown ; _� �� rt � il 'i i � ,I �,�
revitalization strategy that renews and ' � ' I �� A�s., cc d : a I h
: �y, �
expands the downtown core, a designated __ _--+ sF'B y"'• � ..
..----�" _ .. ...a. ..a.
UrbanCenter. a� - � � ��„k;H ,, r- ��
�--- ��_�__��_--'- -
+ This 3.5 mile Corridor aCCounts fOr 70 I �+ -�'K�cr n�w coereiooe
X 'Eceue . , *,,.
percent of Auburn's projected job growth, � ,— �,. ;,,, .: ., . �-- ^ """' AUBURN
,: . ., a,.�..,� ,�,... ,
supports the growth of over 5,000 �°°R°.m^� ^^^^^° °"°" "'.�'""°"' ,"."
projected new jobs for a total of 10,000
projected and existing jobs, and supports the development of over 200 vacant and underdeveloped parcels
along the corridor and in the downtown core.
. Increases access to south King County's only Level 3 Trauma Center, the Aubum Regional Medical Cen[er,
which has 149 beds and 600 employees. Auburn Regional Medical Center is one of only three Level 3
trauma centers in King County. The nearest Level 2 Trauma Centers are each 10 miles away, one north on
SR 167, the o[her south on SR 512. This corridor also creates access ro the proposed Multi-Care facility
with 80 beds and 300-500 projected jobs, and allows for the expansion of a medical complex in the
downtown core.
� Links the Auburn Transit Station to major retailers, employers, and entertainment facilities.
. Identified by the Auburn Stampede Pass Study as the most cost effective project to offset the impact of
Stampede Pass Rail Operations in Auburn.
. Parallel route to Aubum Way and SR 167 that will reduce traffic congestion.
+ Creates a new T-1 corridor that facilitates the efficient movement of freight and goods.
. Allows for improved access to the Auburn Post Office, a regional mail distribution hub.
February 2009
A-B Street Corridor Connector
Grant Funding History
Year Funding Program Amount Amount Notes
Re uested Received
2004 STP (via PSRC) $1,894,350 $859,500
(for FY05/O6)
FY05 Federal Discretionary $2,190,000 $983,900 DunnlCantwell Request
FY05' PSRC Reallocation $0 $41,112 Reallocation of unused PSRC
funds.
Murrev Request
Was told that full amount
FY06 Federal Discretionary $3,446,351 $1,683,000 request was not possible.
Request sould get project from
3rd to 10th.
Murrev Request
FY07 Federal Discretionary $1,746,351 $0 Indicated request would get the
ro ect from 1 Dth to 14th.
Murrav Request
FY08 Federal Discretionary $3,120,000 $1,234,800 Amount needed to complete
the project as the City had lost
some fundin artners.
Murrav Request
FY09 Federal Discretionary $2,000,000 TBD- In Process If successful, will still leave a
fundin shortfall of$2.6 M.
TOTALS $14,397,052 $4,802,312
Proiect Schedule
Month 8 Year
Environmental Documentation Complete and Permits Approved July 2009
Right of Way Acquisition Complete May 2010
Plans, Specifications and Engineer's Estimate (PS&E) Complete July 2010
Construction Begins (estimated) Aug 2010
Construction Complete (estimated) Oct 2011
Fundinq Status
As ofFebruary 2009
Project Costs Per Phase Source Phase Cost Secured Funding
Fundin Shorta e
�k _ _s ;, ,. , �p (�}� q.,+��y,♦.�y,
.h . . ,.� ^�y -� tj';���j�#'"F�l���� µ'Y�<G'.f'}�5.�����I
City Funds � Public $ 135�000
Traffic Impact Fees Private $ 59,149
PSRC STP Funding (Federap PUblic $ 859,500
� . ..� . .. .... -e' .v' .. . .., _ "�W y •;'.:i
�'��I�f �'.���Q'
. dPo _ '.ef. '�+
j
Ciry ROW Purchase Public $ 251,OOOp
City Funds Public $447,555
Gates Contributed ROW Private $ 120,000
Developer Traffic Impact Fees Private $ 275,000
PSRC STP Funding (Federal) Public $41,112
FY05 Transportation Appropriations PubliC $ 661,333
W ��. �_y � --- .,�� :�e . . . ,:,�:
t,'w�'h,`�.v;..� s: i ' 4dv
City Funds� Public $ 34,445a
Developer Contributed Improvement(Gates North Private $ 381,000
Com leted 2D03
Developer Contributed Improvement(Gates South �
To be Completed 2008 Private $605,000
Developer Funds (SHAG Street Delay) Private $ 500,000
FY05 Transportation Appropriations Public $ 322,567
FY06 Transportation Appropriations Public $ 1,683,000
FY08 Transportation Appropriations(estimated) PUblic $ 1,234,800
y� , .-,�a .,. .
�q}��'�:IS'§Fe"n`� �G= �, e"°"�''�'.n'� n�� .�.�H ' � '
a u �-axi . ..!{`:'., .. .... .. ceiEAlV�tJW}L�.e.,..,vv::.'f*vw.. .,Ht��.Et �+.....ea..vR: : . � ' � . �.
'The City has the ability to move some City funds forward in the project, covering the preliminary engineering
funding shortfall by shifting the shortfall to the construction phase.
The City has requested approxima[ely$2 million for the FY09 Transportation Appropriations.
CitV of Aubum Contact:
Pete Lewis, Mayor, City of Auburn - 253.931.3041 —plewisno auburnwa.qov
Carolyn Robertson, Government Relations Manager—253.931.3096—crobertson(a�auburnwa.qov
February 2009
M&O Improvements
Overview
• The last major expansion to the existing M&O facility was in the early 80's when
the City's population was around 30,000. Since then the population and
staff/equipment has doubled while the capacity of the facility has remained
relatively unchanged. The following are the recommended improvements
needed to maintain e�cient maintenance and operations functions for the City.
Most of the improvements will require a contractor to complete but some can be
completed with our own forces.
• Each area refers to the floor plan layout for the Auburn Maintenance and
Operations Building & Site Plans.
New lunchroom (Area A)
• The current lunchlmeeting room seats 35 to 40 people for meetings and 24
people for lunch; our current staff level is 60. Meetings including all staff are held
on a regular basis for safety and operations purposes.
• We propose to build a new multi-purpose room on the north east corner of the
existing building, this addition will be large enough to accommodate our current
and future staff for meetings and lunch, this room would also be available for
other city uses.
Expand Crew Area (Area B)
• This area is located in the center of the main building and is currently used for
vertical storage. The renovated area would accommodate four large crew areas
for our larger divisions. These divisions currently have 10 to 14 staff members
housed in rooms that were designed for 6 people.
Creation of DOC and laundry rooms (Area C)
• Propose to divide this room into two separate rooms. Because of its location
close to the front lobby area that is now used as the our Department Operations
Center (DOC) for emergency response activities including weather incidents.
One section would become a new DOC equipped with all of the material that is
normally need during an emergency event (i.e. work table, maps, computers,
phone and radios) and additional technology such as monitors for use with the
ITS camera system which is a great source of information during emergency
activities.
• The second section would become a new co-ed laundry room with equipment
drying area. With the contaminate possibility that our staff are exposed to
everyday it is necessary that we have facility for staff to launder any soiled
garment that is suspected to be contaminated. We do not want staff taking these
clothes home and possibly contaminating other family member's clothes. We are
also in need of a warm ventilated area for staff to hang their wet outerwear for
drying so it will be ready during the next shift.
Build additional office space (Area D)
•Propose to build additional office space on the SW corner of the existing building,
this area would consist of 4 new offices for managers and supervisors and would
allow all managers and supervisors to be functionally located in close proximity to
each other and to their associated staffs. This area is also close to the lobby to
allow them to assist the public when necessary and helps logistically with
emergency response operations.
Additional equipment repair bay (Area E)
• Propose to add an additional drive through bay to the existing equipment rental
facility that is wide enough to accommodate larger vehicles/equipment. This will
also improve efficiency by allowing more vehicleslequipment to be serviced at
the same time. The existing facility limits our ability to service all necessary
vehicles/equipment.
Unheated equipment storage (Area F)
• Propose to add additional covered storage for large and small equipment on the
north side of the property.
Small tool unheated storage (Area G)
• Propose to build a metal pole building with 6 to 8 bays for the different divisions
to store small equipment and materials that need to be secured. The existing
40'-8' storage containers are not efficient due to their internal size and long
skinny layout.
Existing Park Maintenance Building (Area H)
• Consider use of existing building for Traffic Operations, Sign Shop, and City
Facilities.
Replace existing cover over fueling island (Area I)
•Replace the existing cover with a taller and slightly larger cover to give
appropriate clearance for the larger equipment. The existing cover has been
damaged in the past by one of the large pieces of equipment; some of the
equipment only clears the cover by a few inches.
Improve vehicle/equipment wash facility (Area J)
• Propose to install a cover over both sides of the existing wash facility. Since the
wash pad was install regulations have changed that now require this type of
facility is covered so the rainwater is not allowed to enter the sanitary sewer
system.
• Propose to install new automated and manual vehicle wash equipment to be
more efficient for all city staff and vehicles. At this time the facility has water hose
and hand brushes for staff to use and the city purchases several thousand
dollars in car wash coupons for staff that are not dressed in appropriately to wash
their city vehicles. The facility is also not designed to accommodate cleaning
larger vehicles/equipment.
Heated equipment storage (Area K)
• Propose to install doors on the existing covered equipment storage to get some
of the more sensitive and expensive equipment out of the weather which will
reduce maintenance and possibly extend service life. Also want certain
response vehicles, like pre-loaded sanders, ready to roll without having to
address ice/snow/water on the vehicles. In addition we want to protect vehicles
from freezing that have water storage as a component of the equipment.
Redesign layout and use of compound (See site map and Area L)
• Propose to design a new layout for the outside compound. Additional structures
and parking, and revisions to the yard area over time have led to an inefficient
layout. Add an additional access Gate along the north property line for better
circulation.
• Considerations include working with the Police Department to move the
impound yard to a better location, potentially at GSA.
Decant Facility
Issues:
• The decant facility is used to remove water from vactor and street sweeping
waste so that they can be hauled to landfill disposal sites. Disposal sites have
water content limitations plus contract hauling cost of materials go down as the
water content goes down. As the City continues to grow, the capacity of the
faciliry is beginning to become stressed.
• Major modifcations or expansion of the facility at its current location would likely
have a negative impact on the efficient layout of the M&O compound.
• For some applications a different type of decant facility may be more e�cient.
• Given the size of the City and increased traffic, we are spending more time
hauling to and from work areas and the existing decant facility.
• There has been some interest from Algona and Pacific to develop a joint decant
facility with Auburn, but both agencies would like a facility that is located close
to their City limits.
• There is some sensitivity to locating decant facilities due to limited odor issues
in the immediate vicinity.
Need:
Within the next few years an expansion of the capacity of the existing decant
facility will be necessary.
Proposal:
Consider constructing a second facility, such as in the Lea Hill area, to increase
efficiencies of daily local hauls and meet capacity demands. Construct a type of facility
that compliments the existing one at M&O. Utilize City owned property if possible to
reduce costs. Approach Algona and Pacific to see if they are interested in utilizing and
buying into the capacity of the existing facility at M&O to help off-set cost of the new
facility.
Estimated Cost:
Costs can vary depending upon site development costs (access, utilities, etc.) of
a specific property and on the amount of participation from others.
For one facility - $400,000 not including property costs
Satellite Storage Yards
Issue:
• Given the size of the City and increased traffic, staff are spending more time
hauling to and from work areas and the existing decant facility. During normal
daytime traffic it can take up to 1 hour round trip to load and haul bulk
materials. During heavy traffic or inclement weather times it is significantly
longer.
Need:
Satellite storage yards in Lee Hill and Lakeland Hills area on about one acre
sites.
This would include an exterior storage area to store:
• Sand for sanding operatio�s
• Gravel for Water, Sewer, Storm & Street repairs.
• Cold Mix (asphalt) for Water, Sewer, Storm & Street repairs.
Also include an insulated/ heated storage building to house:
• Sander/ Plow for winter.
• Tractor/ Loader for material.
• Roadside Mower for spring and summer.
• Indoor Storage for frequently used parts.
Proposal:
Build a 40'X40' insulated/heated storage facility on existing city owned property
in the area; the building would include 2 14'X40' bays for equipment storage,
a12'X20' parts storage area, 12'X5' restroom and a 12'X15' work area.
Estimated Cost:
Costs can vary depending upon site development costs of the property.
For 2 facilities - $250,000 not including property costs
M&O Satellite Yard Layout
12'by 20'Pans
� 12'-0" � 12'-0" � 12'-0" � r Storage Room
._ . '
�
12'hy 5'Restraom ��
o -_�
o � _'
N
``\�\
��
i \
i
�taterial Bins
�
�
i l
� �I
14'by40' ..j �
Equipment Bay /
14'by 40' � �
Equipmenl Bay
12'by 15'Work
Area
M & O
Estimated upgrade Cost January 17, 2008
Description Existing M&O
Need Cost
Pro ert :
Ac uire Ad'acent Park Pro ert Area H 3 Acres Unknown
Redesign Layout of Compound (See site map 8 Area L) Existing $360,000.00
Buildin s:
New Lunch Room and Office S ace Areas A& D 2,400 S Ft $336,000.00
Ex and Crew Area Area B 3,000 S Ft $420,000.00
Create DOC and Laund Rooms Area C Existin $15,000.00
Additional E R Ba Area E 3,500 S Ft $497,000.00
Unheated E ui ment and Small Tool Stora e Areas F& G 4,500 S Ft $360,000.00
Re lace Fuelin Island Cover Area I Existin $30,000.00
Im rove Vehiclele ui ment Wash Facilit Area J Existin $120,000.00
Heated E ui ment Stora e Area K 2,400 S Ft $216,000.00
Satellite Yards see se arate document Off-site $250,000.00
Decant Facilit see se arate document Off-site $400,000.00
Subtotal Construction $3,004,000.00
Contin enc 15% $450,600.00
Washin ton State Sales Tax 8.8% $304,004.80
Total Construction Costs $3 758,604.80
Non-Construction Pro'ect Costs
Architectural and Engineering Fees (12% $451,032.58
Permit Fees $80,000.00
Subtotal Non-Construction Costs $295,783.00
Total Project Costs $4,054,387.80
Cost Break-down by Fund
Water Division $506,798.48
Sewer Division $506,798.48
Storm Division $1,013,596.95
Street Division $1 013,596.95
E. R./Centrel Stores $1,013,596.95
Total $4 054,387.80
, ���
e -a - - �
� � �.: ��,� .�.
�'_; - - - - .
_.,. -
� ..�.�,.� � �, �;.�,����> _ �
� �-
, � ,
�,. �I
V u �
_
�- K.
r � C�
� o�� 0
� _ � - � _ .
_� : ' �, �� ,� � � �
� �� T_, � �,
D � � �
. � � ��.dJ ullice space 'h�'-�`:����.`S�� _ � �
� _ —J'
�
n
;
` � _ _.
�� ,� \
- �m�, � ��
_ _._ °- ` �..,,.
__._.. �......� F . �J
� �u.
�
I �� �� K �- . �
_ _ � � � � � ,
�I
•� .J A \
w� ��I i�, �!, � e ` '� .
C '
r...�. L v—_ ' � O p u� '
p C *.-�
I ;lip� � � ...
I �—_
�' � � 11 '.«w _ �,.'�°"w.`�."
_ v...
� m �. ...., . �^ ..�-- " .
II / _�
O . � .. . :,. j . \
—
._ —.___ _ -. ... .r .
:;� - .___. �o..a... H
I ' a«.� �� � �
�
,� �� � I� �¢� nmewene. wre MdOStelmpmvaments� W�xmtt
p AUBULVV PUBLILWORKS�EPARiMENi
y 25weetmeln5uea� I ^^'� 1305'CSTSW
�f v A�wm.wa.n�
g .,.m, — ��v� �,�.` wqSH�Nciox ��— SIIEPLAN
�