Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
6584 (2)
ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 8 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2015 CITY OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS. pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the City of Auburn is required to take action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations at least every seven years; and WHEREAS, over the course of the last two years, a substantial effort has been undertaken to engage the public, business community, service organizations, cultural communities, and other City departments to obtain feedback, thoughts, ideas, and concerns around which to develop a 20 year vision, city values, goals and objectives, policies, and actions; and WHEREAS, this effort began with a community-wide visioning exercise at the end of 2013 which generated more than a thousand comments that have been used to help define a vision and value statement for the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106, the City of Auburn provided its draft Comprehensive Plan to the Washington State Department of Commerce on October 13, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn also provided its draft Comprehensive Plan to the Puget Sound Regional Council on October 13, 2015, in accordance with the procedural requirements outlined in the Puget Sound Regional Council Interlocal Agreement for Regional Planning in the Central Puget Sound Area; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Planning Commission scheduled and held public meetings on May 21, 2014, January 6, March 17, April 7, April 14, April 21, May 5, June 2, October 20, November 4, and December 8, 2015, for the purposes of staff presentations and discussion on the various components of the plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and held public hearings on April 7, April 14, April 21, June 2, November 4, and December 8, 2015, to receive public testimony on the proposed Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council adoption of the final draft Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds it appropriate and in the best interest of the City to adopt the Auburn Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Core Ordinance No. 6584 December 2. 2015 Page 1 of 3 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, the Capital Facilities Element, the Utilities Element, the Transportation Element, the Economic Development Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, the Appendices listed within the Core Comprehensive Plan, and the referenced functional plans listed in the Capital Facilities Element; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan meets the criteria set forth in the Auburn City Code and all other applicable legal criteria; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the Growth Management Act, the King County and Pierce County County-Wide Planning Policies, and the Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has reviewed its development regulations for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act, and has determined that the City's adopted development regulations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, by adoption of this ordinance, the City of Auburn has completed the mandatory periodic comprehensive plan review process that is set forth in RCW 36.70A.130. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows Section 1. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan. The City of Auburn 2015 Comprehensive Plan on file with the office of the City Clerk is adopted and is available for inspection therein. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, Ordinance No. 6584 December 2, 2015 Page 2 of 3 section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. DEC - 7 2015 FIRST READING: SECOND READING: DEC 1 4 2015 PASSED: DEC 14 2015 APPROVED: DEC 1 4 2015 NANO ACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: kae-S6 Da 'elle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPRO D AS TO FORM: 7, ofii Ai A D.-el B. Heid, ity Attorney -� PUBLISHED: \, j Ordinance No. 6584 December 2, 2015 Page 3 of 3 • nik„ AU BURN AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM 0VA1t I i'. I Agenda Subject: Date: Ordinance No. 6584, First Reading December 2, 2015 Department: Attachments: Budget Impact: Community Development Exhibit 1 -ordinance No.6584 $0 and Public Works Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 Exhibit 10 Exhibit 11 Exhibit 12 Exhibit 13 Administrative Recommendation: • City Council adopt Ordinance No. 6584. Background Summary: Background: Chapter 36.70A.130 of the Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes a requirement that cities periodically review and update, if necessary, their comprehensive plans every 7 years. The deadline for updating the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan was July 1, 2015. State and regional agencies have been supportive of the City's ongoing efforts to complete the comprehensive plan update, but have also indicated that it is important for the City to take final action prior to December 31 , 2015. RCW 36.70A.030 establishes the mandatory requirements for "elements" that must be included in a comprehensive plan. Those elements include land use, housing, capital facilities, utilities, transportation, economic development, and parks and recreation. Volumes 1 thru 7 are titled and organized to be consistent with the GMA requirements. Additionally, the City has opted to create a "Core Comprehensive Plan" which serves as the foundation for all of the mandatory elements. Overview: • ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 65 of 751 The Comprehensive Plan establishes the planning framework for Auburn out to the year 2035 and beyond. The Core Plan sets forth the City's vision, values, goals, broad policies, and actions that are necessary in order to achieve the stated objectives. Volumes 1 thru 7 are the policy documents that establish the details for how to achieve the objectives. Process: Exhibits 2 thru 10 constitute the City of Auburn Planning Commission's recommended Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission's recommendation concludes a public process that began in Q4 of 2013. In addition to the standard series of Planning Commission meetings and hearings, the public process included a citywide visioning exercise, several public workshops, numerous public presentations, continuous webpage updates, routine citywide email notifications and updates, and one citywide mailer. Appendix E of the Plan provides a detailed overview of all of the public outreach efforts. In addition to the above described public outreach efforts, the City is also required to initiate State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as well as delivery of materials through a formal notification process to the Washington State Department of Commerce and the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). It is worth noting that both the State Department of Commerce and PSRC provided meaningful praise for the City's approach, efforts and the quality of the product. PSRC provided about a dozen relatively minor suggested edits which were incorporated into the appropriate planning documents and are reflected in the Planning Commission's recommendation. Important Note: Exhibits 2 thru 10 are the initial staff drafts for each document. These versions are being transmitted to City Council for first ordinance reading on December 7th because the Planning Commission will not deliberate and act on the materials until December 8th. In order to respect the Planning Commission's role and responsibility, staff is not transmitting their recommendation until December 9th which will be included in City Council's December 14th packet. Therefore, City Council's second reading on December 14th will likely include updated materials to reflect the Planning Commission's recommendation. This approach was used in order to ensure that City Council had an opportunity to consider adoption of the Plan before December 31, 2016. Following City Council action, CDPW intends to deliver the Comprehensive Plan for final professional formatting and editing. This will likely result in suggested technical corrections pertaining to grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other types of scrivener's errors. This effort will not result in any substantive change. Plan Organization: ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 66 of 751 As indicated above, Exhibit 2 thru 10 constitute the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several appendices that are "inputs" or reference documents that were used • to develop the Plan (e.g. the 2014 Imagine Auburn Vision Report). Additionally, there are several "outputs" or extensions of the Plan that further implement the stated vision, goals and objectives (e.g. functional plan such as the specific utility plans). The Planning Commission's recommendation includes a recommendation to adopt the listed appendices and the referenced functional plans. Exhibit 10 provides a specific list of the appendices and referenced functional plans that will be adopted as part of the adoption of Ordinance No. 6584. Following City Council action, CDPW intends to deliver the Comprehensive Plan for final professional formatting and editing. This will likely result in suggested technical corrections pertaining to grammar, punctuation, spelling, and other types of scrivener's errors. This effort will not result in any substantive change. Plan Organization: As indicated above, Exhibit 2 thru 10 constitute the Comprehensive Plan. However, there are several appendices that are "inputs" or reference documents that were used to develop the Plan (e.g. the 2014 Imagine Auburn Vision Report). Additionally, there are several "outputs" or extensions of the Plan that further implement the stated vision, goals and objectives (e.g. functional plan such as the specific utility plans). The Planning Commission's recommendation includes a recommendation to adopt the • listed appendices and the referenced functional plans. Exhibit 10 provides a specific list of the appendices and referenced functional plans that will be adopted as part of the adoption of Ordinance No. 6584. Exhibit 1: Proposed Ordinance No. 6584 adopting the 2015 City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan* Exhibit 2: Core Comprehensive Plan Exhibit 3: Volume 1 - Land Use Element Exhibit 4: Volume 2 - Housing Element Exhibit 5: Volume 3 - Capital Facilities Element Exhibit 6: Volume 4 - Utilities Element Exhibit 7: Volume 5 -Transportation Element Exhibit 8: Volume 6 - Economic Development Element Exhibit 9: Volume 7 - Parks and Recreation Element Exhibit 10: Reference to Functional Plans and Appendices that are Adopted by Reference Exhibit 11: Appendix J - Parks, Arts, and Recreation Open Space Plan Exhibit 12: Public Outreach Exhibit 13: Public and Agency Comments I ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 67 of 751 *Exhibits 2 thru 9 are the elements that constitute the 2015 City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan Reviewed by Council Committees: Councilmember: Staff: Snyder Meeting Date: December 7, 2015 Item Number: ORD.E ORD.E AUBURN * MORE THAN YOU IMAGINED Page 68 of 751 ORDINANCE NO. 6 5 8 4 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2015 CITY OF AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.130, the City of Auburn is required to take action to review and, if needed, revise its comprehensive plan and development regulations at least every seven years; and WHEREAS. over the course of the last two years, a substantial effort has been undertaken to engage the public, business community, service organizations, cultural communities, and other City departments to obtain feedback, thoughts, ideas, and concerns around which to develop a 20 year vision, city values, goals and objectives, policies, and actions; and WHEREAS, this effort began with a community-wide visioning exercise at the end of 2013 which generated more than a thousand comments that have been used to help define a vision and value statement for the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106, the City of Auburn provided its draft Comprehensive Plan to the Washington State Department of Commerce on October 13, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn also provided its draft Comprehensive Plan to the Puget Sound Regional Council on October 13, 2015, in accordance with the procedural requirements outlined in the Puget Sound Regional Council Interlocal Agreement for Regional Planning in the Central Puget Sound Area; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn Planning Commission scheduled and held public meetings on May 21, 2014. January 6, March 17, April 7, April 14, April 21, May 5, June 2, October 20, November 4, and December 8, 2015, for the purposes of staff presentations and discussion on the various components of the plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and held public hearings on April 7, April 14, April 21, June 2. November 4, and December 8, 2015, to receive public testimony on the proposed Plan; and WHEREAS, on December 8, 2015, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council adoption of the final draft Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council finds it appropriate and in the best interest of the City to adopt the Auburn Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Core Ordinance No. 6584 December 2, 2015 ORl.e 1 of 3 Page 69 of 751 Comprehensive Plan, the Land Use Element, the Housing Element, the Capital Facilities Element, the Utilities Element, the Transportation Element, the Economic Development Element, the Parks and Recreation Element, the Appendices listed within the Core Comprehensive Plan, and the referenced functional plans listed in the Capital Facilities Element; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan meets the criteria set forth in the Auburn City Code and all other applicable legal criteria; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council determines that the Comprehensive Plan is consistent with the Growth Management Act, the King County and Pierce County County-Wide Planning Policies, and the Puget Sound Regional Council's Vision 2040; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has reviewed its development regulations for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the Growth Management Act, and has determined that the City's adopted development regulations are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, by adoption of this ordinance, the City of Auburn has completed the mandatory periodic comprehensive plan review process that is set forth in RCW 36.70A.130. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows Section 1. Adoption of Comprehensive Plan. The City of Auburn 2015 Comprehensive Plan on file with the office of the City Clerk is adopted and is available for inspection therein. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, Ordinance No. 6584 December 2, 2015 ORDp. e 2 of 3 Page 70 of 751 section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. FIRST READING: SECOND READING: PASSED: APPROVED: NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: IIIDanielle E. Daskam, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Daniel B. Heid, City Attorney PUBLISHED: • Ordinance No. 6584 December 2, 2015 ORLp.tle3of3 Page71 of751 Exhibit 2 • CITY OF AUBURN CORE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COVER PAGE • INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TO BE FILLED WITH TITLE AND GRAPHIC 0 ORD.E Page 72 of 751 Acknowledgments INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TO BE FILLED WITH NAMES AND ORGANIZATION City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 2 ORD.E Page 73 of 751 • Table of Contents Introduction and Background Executive Summary User's Guide Community Profile and Characteristics Community Vision and Values Character Wellness Service Economy Celebration Environment Sustainability Policy Elements Volume 1-Land Use Policy Element Volume 2-Housing Policy Element • Volume 3-Capital Facilities Policy Element Volume 4-Utilities Policy Element Volume 5-Transportation Policy Element Volume 6-Economic Development Policy Element Volume 7-Parks and Open Space Policy Element Future Land Use Map Appendices • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 3 ORD.E Page 74 of 751 Introduction and Background Auburn is in the midst of an exciting stage of its evolution. From the 1850's until the mid 1990's, Auburn has transitioned from a railroad and farming community to a small town. Since then, the dynamism brought upon by opportunities and challenges that come with growth and progress have drastically changed the City. With the annexations that occurred in the late 1990's and 2000's, the overall growth since the 2000's, and its anticipated growth over the next 20 years, Auburn is maturing into a City of local and regional significance with an operating budget in excess of a quarter billion dollars annually. This ongoing maturation has changed Auburn from a relatively insulated small town, nestled in the midst of many other similar communities that surround Seattle and Tacoma, to a City with its own complex identity and a myriad of dreams and dilemmas. At the time of settlement and for the next 100 years, the Auburn of 2035, with its 100,000 projected residents,would be hard to imagine. Auburn's transition from a small town to a City of regional significance is far from complete. There is much work ahead of us. While we are fortunate to have many strengths and opportunities to build upon, we also know that we have work to do in many areas. We must prepare for the future challenges we know we will face, as well as those that will be presented to us along the way. This Comprehensive Plan establishes a commitment to a future Auburn and lays the foundation for how we will navigate the next 20 years. It accomplishes this by expressing the following: • Describing a vision for Auburn. • Declaring our commitment to core values. • Setting policies to achieve the vision. • Outlining actions that adhere to core values. There were a variety of sources that shaped this Plan, but the single greatest influence is the people who live,work, and visit Auburn. The process for developing this Plan included input from more than 1,000 citizens and business owners who shared their opinions, criticisms, ideas and concerns regarding where we are today and where we need to be in the future. The following is an overview of the key inputs that shaped this Plan: • In 2014 the City conducted the "Imagine Auburn" visioning exercise, which yielded about 1,000 responses from citizens, visitors and business owners. This effort alone provides a major source of influence for the Plan. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 4 ORD.E Page 75 of 751 • • A substantial amount of demographic data was analyzed in order to understand the profile of our community and to identify trends in our community. These data provided a significant amount of information toward formulating ideas and concepts. • The Auburn Health Impact Assessment and Housing Inventory were focused studies conducted to provide enhanced information in important areas. These studies provide direct input on how to promote a healthy lifestyle in Auburn and how to manage the diverse housing stock that exists in a City that is 124 years old. • The Washington State Growth Management Act, King and Pierce Countywide Planning Policies,and the Puget Sound Regional Council VISION 2040 are laws and policies under which the City must plan. While these do not define our vision, they do establish the framework within which we must operate. The Comprehensive Plan is a guidance document. At its nucleus are the City's collective vision and values which provide a foundation for future direction. The policies and actions will help the Mayor, City Council, and staff follow the path to our vision, but we must remember that this path is wide and it will meander a bit. The world around us is constantly changing,so being flexible and open-minded allows us to better face the challenges that confront us. • • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 5 ORD.E Page 76 of 751 Executive Summary The Auburn of 2035 will be an exciting,vibrant city where businesses want to locate and people want to live or visit. This document constitutes the plan that City leadership will utilize to achieve positive outcomes. Reading through the plan may lead to questions about the City's aspirations and goals. In many ways, Auburn is a"diamond in the rough". The City's elected officials, staff members, and citizens overwhelmingly believe that strong leadership and considered planning can lead to Auburn realizing its potential. With two major rivers,access to many parks and trails,a solid business core, a committed government,and a long list of other assets and traits,Auburn has all the right building blocks to achieve great things. We just need to put those building blocks together and commit to carrying out all the things we need to do to get there. We are eager to continue the good work that has already been done, but are even more excited to ascend to a much higher level. You might also wonder how we got to a point of defining a vision or laying out the plan to get there. While there are many inputs that helped guide this process, the vision and resultant plan starts with the people who either live here or spend their time working here or visiting. That feedback provided great insight into our strengths and weaknesses, perceptions and concerns, as well as ideas for what Auburn should be in the future. The following is a list that captures many of the thoughts that were shared: 1. Citizens of Auburn share a tremendous pride in community-this is perhaps the most important building block for successful implementation of a Comprehensive Plan. 2. We are a community that delights in our history,which makes it hard to know the way forward in a way that embraces the new and unknown,while honoring the past-we need to overcome this paradox that slows our progress. 3. Auburn has an extensive inventory of parks, natural areas, and open spaces,as well as arts and recreation opportunities-these are essential components for a healthy community where people want to live, play and work. 4. Most residents commute to jobs that are outside Auburn,while most people who work in Auburn arrive from other locations-we need to explore ways to change this pattern. 5. Auburn has a robust collection of environmental resources. Through a combination of protection, preservation and education both people and wildlife deserve a healthy natural environment. 6. We are proud of, and find strength in, our social, cultural and ethnic diversity-continuing to further celebrate and leverage our diversity is a necessity. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 6 ORD.E Page 77 of 751 • 7. Auburn lacks complete non-motorized connections that join residential areas with commercial centers, recreational opportunities, or other residential neighborhoods-addressing this concern will create more opportunity to live a healthy lifestyle, use other modes of transport aside from cars, and build our sense of a connected community. 8. The presence of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe offers great opportunity for partnership and to mutually enhance our economic, social and cultural presence within the community and region-we need to continue to build our relationship with MIT to capitalize on these opportunities. 9. Historic downtown Auburn has maintained a Main Street that many communities have long since lost and are seeking ways to recreate -we need to continue our work to make downtown Auburn a destination to visit and a pedestrian-friendly, transit oriented location to live. 10. Our physical location between Seattle and Tacoma, along the Sound Transit commuter line, and at the intersection of SR-18 and SR-167 are ideal conditions for ensuring efficient movement of goods and people-we need to better exploit our location advantage when trying to attract businesses and residents. 11. There is a sentiment that Auburn could be safer-we need to overcome this perception so that Auburn is a more desirable place to live, work and play. 12. There is a high level of dedication, commitment and excellence at our local school districts and • Green River College-we need to strengthen our partnerships with these institutions that are equally passionate about elevating Auburn to a premier community. 13. Auburn has a diverse mix of housing types, however that does not mean it is appropriately distributed throughout the City-while we have achieved or exceeded our goals for providing a mix of housing, there is a need to better disperse different types of housing throughout the City, while preserving existing housing stock. 14. Auburn already has a robust and diverse base of businesses, but there is a need to further diversify-we need more businesses that generate revenue and jobs that will lead to local spending. 15. Many of Auburn's streets are deteriorating due to their age, increased traffic volumes,especially heavy trucks, or from design and construction standards based on previous jurisdictional requirements prior to their annexation into the City-we need to sustain revenue streams and to allocate resources in a manner that keeps our streets in good condition. 16. Access to healthy food and activities varies greatly throughout the City-this disparity should be equalized in order to ensure that our entire community has the ability to choose to live a healthy lifestyle. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 7 ORD.E Page 78 of 751 17. We are passionate about the extensive level of social and human services that exists in Auburn but believe that other communities need to follow our example rather than lean on us to take care of those in need-we struggle with how to provide local support within an overall balanced regional approach. 18. As a 124 year old City there are buildings and areas in Auburn that are tired in their appearance and function-we need to find ways to help energize the way those areas look and feel. The Core Plan establishes a vision and series of values that are used to address the above themes. By outlining the goals, policies and actions necessary to build upon our strengths and overcome our weaknesses. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 8 ORD.E Page 79 of 751 • User's Guide The Comprehensive Plan is comprised of the Core Plan, a number of Contributing Reports (inputs), and a number of Policy Elements (outputs). The following is an overview of the types of documents that are included in the plan, how they are used, and their intended audience. Examples of Contributing Examples of Policy Reports(Inputs) Elements(Outputs) Utilities Health Impact Land Use Element Assessment Element Parks& Rec Imagine > Core Plan Housing _ Element Auburn Element - Capital Facilities Growth Transportation Element Management AElement Economic rev. Element • Core P/an:The Core Plan serves as the principal planning and guidance document used by City leadership in their efforts to implement the Community's vision. It is a document that is intended to be used and consulted by City Council and staff when evaluating city decisions, allocating city resources, reviewing Policy Elements,committing to new City endeavors, and making fiscal decisions. Every discussion and action by City Council should start and end with the following:"Is this action true to our long term City vision;does it align with our City values;and is it consistent with our adopted policies?" Contributing Reports: Contributing Reports are"inputs" into the Core Plan. Contributing Reports provide statutory rules or background analysis and data that are used to help develop vision, values, policies, and priorities. Examples of Contributing Reports include the Buildable Lands Analysis, the Imagine Auburn community visioning report,the Growth Management Act, and the Health Impact Assessment, These Reports are either prepared by City staff to better understand conditions within Auburn or are provided by other government agencies that provide statewide or regional planning parameters. • City of Auburn Core Comprehensive Plan Page 9 ORD.E Page 80 of 751 Policy Elements: Policy Elements are"outputs" of the Core Plan. Policy Elements provide guidance in specific areas such as land use, housing,transportation, and parks. These elements establish how the city should manage systems and resources today and into the future. With support from City staff, Policy Elements are developed and adopted by City Council. Once adopted, Policy Elements become a manual for City staff in their implementation efforts to design and construct capital projects,develop and maintain city programs,draft development regulations, pursue grant money, and to carry out other types of typical tasks. Policy Elements are the principal planning and guidance documents for City staff. Where conflict or ambiguity exists between a Policy Element and a City regulation, the specific Policy Element will prevail. Where there is conflict or ambiguity between Policy Elements or if a Policy Element does not provide enough guidance to resolve the conflict or ambiguity,the vision, values,and overarching policies of the Core Plan will be used to arrive at a final decision. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 10 ORD.E Page 81 of 751 Community Profile and Characteristics 10 Population Growth As of 2014,Auburn ranks as the 14th most populated city within the State of Washington with a population of approximately 76,347. It is located within the two most populous counties in the state (King and Pierce counties) and is nearly equidistant from its two largest cities, Seattle and Tacoma. Proximity to both of these cities, and being in a central location within Puget Sound Region, has helped Auburn grow at a steady rate. Auburn's growth can be characterized in three eras. The 67 year settlement era of 1893 to 1950 saw the City grow to a size of 6,500 residents. The 40 year absorption era of 1950 to 1990 saw a substantial amount of infill development and the City increase at a rate of about 6,500 residents per decade to 33,000. Since 1990, the City has been going through an expansion era that has seen three significant annexations of areas that have substantial development potential. Racial and Ethnic Characteristics Auburn has seen significant demographic changes over the last decade.According to the 2010 U.S. Census, approximately 70.5%of Auburn's population is White/Non-Hispanic;data from the 2000 Census reported the white population in Auburn at 79%. In 1990, the white population was roughly 90%.What this means is that Auburn has grown significantly more diverse in a 25-year period.As of 2014 estimates,the overall white population is just under 50,000 at 49,238.This means that approximately 68.5%of Auburn's population is white. If this trend continues, Auburn will • become increasingly racially diverse. Household and Income Characteristics The year 2000 Census indicated that Auburn had 16,108 households; this number has catapulted. The current household number estimates (based on 2013 figures) have increased to 27,427.This significant increase is due to substantial development activity over the past 15 or so years and significant annexations. Homeownership in Auburn is just under 60 percent,which is 3.5 points lower than the State average.The lower percentage of homeownership corresponds to Auburn's other below-Washington averages in per capita income, median household income, graduation rate,as well as a higher-than-average percentage of persons under the poverty level.Auburn's median household income is$55,483 compared to the Washington average of$59,478, which is a nearly$4,000 difference,thus reducing earning power. Age Characteristics Auburn is a statistically a younger community than the state of Washington.The median age in Washington is 37 years; the median age in Auburn is 35.5.This is up from 34.1 years of age in 2000. While the median age has increased,the youth population remains significant. 7.4%of Auburn residents are under 5 years of age and 25.9%are under the age of 18 both of which are significantly higher than the state average. The percentage of people over the age of 65 is 10.2%, which compares similarly to the state of Washington figure of 12.3%. Demographic data suggests a City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 11 ORD.E Page 82 of 751 need for services and programming that address the needs of children and families, while continuing to focus on the needs of more mature adults and single people of all ages. Resident Labor Force and Employment Characteristics Since its population boom during the construction of the railroad freight terminals at the start of the 20th Century,Auburn has in many respects remained a"blue collar"community. This trend, however, is declining as local economies in Washington diversify. In 1990,one out of four of Auburn's residents worked in the manufacturing industry. Between 1990 and 2000, Auburn's resident labor force lost 1,000, or approximately one-fourth, of these manufacturing jobs. This trend of manufacturing job loss has been a nationwide trend, as companies relocate to other cities and states based on tax savings, and many other companies are increasingly outsourcing jobs overseas. In this ever-changing landscape,jobs continue to migrate into different sectors.This slow shift is evidenced by the lessened impact of major employers in Auburn.They no longer dominate the job market as small and medium-sized companies create more jobs.As recently as 2002, the top ten employers accounted for nearly 85% of the total city employment. In 2011, these same employers,which remained in the top ten,accounted for 55%of the total employment base.This illustrates that the number of total jobs has significantly increased and that the number of job providers or employers has also increased. Generally,workers are tasked with finding jobs where compensation is most lucrative. Education and specialized skills typically play a large role in finding high-paying,available jobs.An educated population encourages companies to relocate to Auburn based on the available local workforce. While Auburn's high school graduation rate of 87.5%is fairly close to the state average of 90%, the college graduation rate is more than 9 points lower than the state average. As mentioned previously, the median and per capita income is significantly lower than the state average.These data suggest that there may be a skills under match between regional employer expectations and available workers in Auburn. According to the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) and the US Department of Labor, approximately 41,000 jobs are located in Auburn. This number has grown steadily since 2010; it is important to note that the number of jobs must be considered with an understanding of the massive loss of manufacturing jobs and the very slow national economic recovery since the economic downturn in 2008. Comparing the market sector distribution and number of jobs between 1995, 2000, 2010, and 2013 illustrates some changes that have taken place in Auburn's job market over the last 20 years. It also reflects nationwide trends based on the overall health of the economy, decline of manufacturing, and an increasing reliance on service. Important categories to note are: a. Government and education, which have grown based on the increasing population of Auburn and the need to provide increased and better service to residents, as well as the success of Green River College City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 12 ORD.E Page 83 of 751 b. Trade, transportation, and utilities jobs(WTU) have more than doubled since 1995,also due to the relative growth of Auburn c. Construction has nearly doubled since 1995:this is due in large part to the significant development that has been constructed in Auburn,such as Lakeland Hills;the dip in 2010 is due to the economic downturn that began in 2008 d. Retail and services are significantly more important to Auburn's current job outlook than in 1995; service is largely increased due to the overall nationwide trend of less manufacturing and more service-based jobs e. Finance, insurance, and real estate have held steady over the last 20 years Table 1-Job Distribution by Market Area-1995-2013 1995 2000 2010 2013 Const/Res 1,693 3,051 2,148 2,636 FIRE 760 567 757 784 Manufacturing 11,530 12,241 7,521 8,680 Retail 3,275 5,152 4,705 5,392 Services 6,241 11,437 10,496 10,700 WTU 2,716 3,619 5,475 6,626 Government 1,166 1,332 3,457 3,166 • Education 1,282 1,344 2,810 2,981 Total 28,663 38,742 37,370 40,964 Daily Inflow and Outflow: The Auburn Commute In 2013 the average daily commute from Auburn is 29 minutes, as of 2013 which is an increase since 2000. A more interesting issue than the length of people's commute is the number of people commuting out of and into Auburn. Both of these numbers far outstrip the number of people who live and work within Auburn. This number has been virtually unchanged over the last decade. The number of residents of Auburn, who also work in Auburn, has stayed at just over 4,000. The most promising data from the inflow and outflow is that there is a significant increase in the number of people commuting to Auburn for work. The influx of non-residents provides another pool of people that engage with the services,features,and resources in the City. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 13 ORD.E Page 84 of 751 ■ ■ ■ iR ■''..% • INFLOW �r� OUTFLOW 1.•• . • . . s • • 31,1211 23,613 N,ON4E50tHn xitlYvl, .. . Wt WkINt SIN ItV,.G. AMAIN d%.:•I.Mh I 4,535 Auburn in the Future-Projections of Growth The Puget Sound Regional Council, King County, Pierce County and the City of Auburn need to understand growth projections, patterns and implications for the 20-30 year planning horizon. Based on various models and analyses,available developable land, population data,and expected economic trends,jurisdictions can better understand industrial, commercial,and residential land supply and capacity.This understanding can be used to extrapolate future available housing units and employment growth. The primary data tool for planning for future growth are County prepared buildable lands analysis. These reports establish the parameters around which cities and counties jointly plan for both residential and job growth. As a two county city, the City of Auburn coordinates with both King County and Pierce County in determining growth projections, land supply, and the adequacy of urban services to serve future growth. The following description and data are taken from the King County and Pierce County Buildable Lands Analyses. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 14 ORD.E Page 85 of 751 2014 Kinq County Buildable Lands Analysis • After deducting for constraints,future right-of-way and public purpose needs,and after applying a market factor, the King County Buildable Lands Analysis shows that Auburn has approximately 2,150.5 adjusted net acres of vacant and redevelopable residentially zoned land available during the planning period through 2031. As seen in Table 2, the majority of available land for development is zoned for single-family residential purposes. Based on the residential land supply analysis and historical densities, an estimate of housing unit capacity was developed. Table 2 identifies the estimated capacity(in housing units) in King County by the aggregated zoning type. This estimate shows a capacity of approximately 14,597 housing units in the King County portion of the City exists out to the year 2031. Table 2-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres of Vacant and Redevelopable Land and Capacity by Aggregated Residential Zoning Type Gross Adjusted Net Capacity Acres Net Acres(1) (Housing units) Single Family-Vacant 2,018.0 1,050.1 3,477 Single Family- Redevelopable 1,507.0 871.1 3,108 Multi-Family-Vacant 120 85.4 1,156 Multi-Family- Redevelopable 50.0 36.3 460 Multi-Family/ Mixed Use-Vacant 16 12.9 1,822 • Multi-Family/ Mixed Use- Redevelopable 117.2 94.7 4,574 TOTAL 3,828.2 2,150.5 14,597 (1) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land available for development after critical areas,anticipated right-of-way and public purposes needs and a market factor have been taken into account. Estimates of how much commercial and industrial square footage are available were also calculated. The last column in Table 3 identifies the gross and adjusted net vacant and redevelopable land by commercial and industrial land use from the King County Buildable Lands analysis. Employment capacity was developed by applying a floor area per employee ratio. Table 3-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres and Capacity of Commercial and Industrial Land Supply(King County-2012) Adjusted Net Capacity Gross Acres Net Acres(1) (Employment) Commercial Vacant/Redevelopable 501.5 412.4 7,094 Mixed Use Vacant/Redevelopable 133.2 107.6 2,525 Industrial Vacant/Redevelopable 533.0 354.9 9,417 TOTAL 1,167.7 874.9 19,036 (1) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land after critical areas,future anticipated streets,land for public purposes and market factor have been considered. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 15 ORD.E Page 86 of 751 Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis Table 4 identifies the estimated capacity(in housing units) in Pierce County by the zoning type. This estimate shows a capacity of approximately 922 housing units in the Pierce County portion of the City exists to the year 2030. Table 4- Gross and Adjusted Net Acres of Vacant and Redevelopable Land by Residential Zoning Type(Pierce County- 2012) Adjusted Net Capacity Gross Acres Net Acres(t) (Housing units) R5, Residential 39.24 30.38 323 TV,Terrace View 3.17 1.34 86 Lakeland Hills South PUD 52.94 N/A 513 TOTAL 95.35 31.72 922 (1) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land available for development after critical areas,anticipated right-of-way, lands public purpose needs,and a market factor have been taken into account. The Pierce County Buildable Lands analysis includes a 2030 employment target of 843 and an employment capacity of 595. This estimate was based on the likely employment generated by the commercial parcels located within Lakeland Hills South PUD and other vacant commercial lands along A St. SE. Table 5-Gross and Adjusted Net Acres and Capacity of Commercial and Industrial Land Supply (Pierce County- 2012) Adjusted Net Capacity Gross Acres Net Acres(1) (Employment) Commercial Vacant/Redevelopable 501.5 412.4 7,094 Mixed Use Vacant/Redevelopable 133.2 107.6 2,525 Industrial Vacant/Redevelopable 533.0 354.9 9,417 TOTAL 1,167.7 874.9 19,036 (1) "Adjusted Net Acres"represents land after critical areas,future anticipated streets,land for public purposes and market factor have been considered. Combined King County and Pierce County Projections and Allocations Table 6 provides a city-wide summary of housing unit and employment allocations. Table 6-City of Auburn 2006-2030/31 Housing Unit and Employment Allocations(King and Pierce Counties) Housing Units Employment King County 9,004 19,200 Pierce County 3,634 843 TOTAL 12,638 Units 20,043 Jobs City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 16 ORD.E Page 87 of 751 While the calculations and categories used previously to identify market sectors and job counts • differ,Table 7 illustrates the tremendous job growth expected over the next 25 years.The total number of jobs in Auburn is projected to increase 55% by 2040. The largest total gain will be in the Construction sector. Other significant gains are in the FIRE/Services, Education and Retail/Food Services sectors. Table 7-Job Distribution by Market Area-2010-2040 2010 2020 2030 2040 2010 to 2040 Change Const/Res 2,488 4,747 4,704 5,822 134% FIRE/Services 12,398 15,935 18,734 22,213 79.2% Manufacturing/WTU 13,366 13,661 14,512 15,731 17.7% Retail/Food Services 7,218 9,084 10,396 12,323 70.7% Government 2,243 1,812 1,841 1,883 -16.1% Education 2,137 3,143 3.466 3,815 78.5% Total 39,883 48,023 53,847 62,003 55.5% Table 8 illustrates that around 37,000 units will be available by 2030-31. This is nearly 10,000 more units than in 2010; the addition of 20,000 more people would require this level of increase based on the buildable lands population target, current zoning,and expected densities.Auburn is more than prepared to accommodate this large influx of housing.Auburn is also prepared to consider pathways to meet the housing demand on less land, through higher density and by reconsidering 4110 zoning implementation and rules. Table 8- Population and Housing Forecasts-2010-2035 Estimate Forecasts 2010 2025 2030 2031 2035 Housing Units 27,827 34,582 36,827 37,276 39,072 Total Households 26,051 33,031 35,351 35,815 37,671 Household Population 69,491 84.126 88,996 89,970 93,866 Total Population 70,159 84,948 89,868 90,852 94,788 • .. .... . .. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 17 ORD.E Page 88 of 751 Community Vision and Values In 2035 Auburn is a city of connected and cherished places, from a vibrant downtown to quiet open spaces and everything in between, where a community of healthy, diverse, and engaged people live and thrive. In 2014, a substantial amount of time and energy was dedicated to developing a vision for Auburn in 2035. Discussions occurred in the community through the Imagine Auburn visioning process and amongst city council members. Many themes and messages surfaced about who we are and what we aspire to become. In the words of City Council, a 2035 Auburn will be a"premier community with vibrant opportunities". Participants of Imagine Auburn added ideas for what they thought this meant. The vision that emerged is encapsulated in the following seven value statements: 1. Character: Developing and preserving attractive and interesting places where people want to be. 2. Wellness: Promoting community-wide health and safety wellness. 3. Service: Providing transparent government service. 4. Economy: Encouraging a diverse and thriving marketplace for consumers and businesses. 5. Celebration: Celebrating our diverse cultures, heritage, and community. 6. Environment: Stewarding our environment. 7. Sustainability: Creating a sustainable future for our community. The Comprehensive Plan is rooted in these values and they form a collective vision. But these values do not end with the adoption of this Plan. They form the context around which we discuss, debate,act, prioritize and lead our community to the vision we have created in this Plan. Identifying values and creating a description of what each of these values look like,what they mean, and how they will happen establishes a basis for evaluating future City policies, regulations, actions, investments, budget priorities, grant-seeking priorities, and other community decisions. In addition, the seven values underscore the entirety of the Comprehensive Plan and its implementation, which includes the development of capital improvement,transportation, parks and open space plans,and implementing regulations and standards.These values are the core of how we make choices. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 18 ORD.E Page 89 of 751 Character • We will create and maintain high quality neighborhoods, places,and spaces. What it will look like: • Active gathering spaces, such as parks, plazas, cafes,concert venues,festivals and markets, will be distributed throughout the City: these spaces will be engaging and filled with people interacting, irrespective of culture, age, or income level. • Buildings, landscaping,and outdoor spaces will be attractive, interesting,well designed,and maintained. • Buildings will be well-maintained and rehabilitated and new buildings will complement existing historic resources. • Neighborhoods will be socially and physically connected and include features and development patterns that encourage us to interact. • The community will have embraced the concept of"One Auburn"while capitalizing on the unique local needs and identities of individual neighborhoods and districts. What it means: • Auburn has a reputation for high quality and engaging spaces, an array of performing arts programs,wonderful public arts,extensive retail and restaurant options, and a variety of community-led activities: a destination locale where citizens enjoy spending time, visitors look forward to returning to, and merchants want to stay. • • Community programs and physical connections bring the City together. • Residents and visitors have a wide range of options for getting to and from Auburn, as well as travel alternatives within the City. How it will happen: • By implementing investments and branding strategies that recognize and reinforce an individual identity for the City and its neighborhoods. • By looking for opportunities to keep Auburn attractive,safe, interesting and fun. • By ensuring that new construction and redevelopment of all projects incorporate amenities that promote human interaction,further connect the community, and create people-centric land uses:at the same time, property rights will be protected through due process, reasonable implementation of regulations, and careful consideration of impacts to existing development. The City is committed to diversity and togetherness through innovative public space. Public space will support dynamic businesses and events by being walkable and connected.We believe that if we are forward-thinking,embracing of technology, supportive of arts, and advocates for safety,that we will have places that are cohesive, accessible, and interesting. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 19 ORD.E Page 90 of 751 Wellness We will build and maintain an environment that promotes public safety and healthy lifestyle options. What it will look like: • Multiple recreation options, and nearby trails, parks, activities,and events that will be readily accessible to the entire community. - A safe and inviting atmosphere for all will be provided throughout Auburn. • A variety of healthy food options will be physically and economically accessible to all members of the Auburn community. • Housing stock will be maintained and monitored to limit the presence of declining, unsafe neighborhoods. - Risk to life and property from hazards will be minimized. • Public infrastructure will be well-maintained. What it means: • More outdoor private and public amenities that offer people recreation options and safe passage throughout the community - Fresh, local and healthy food options should be available to all members of the community. • Housing, neighborhoods,and spaces are held to a high standard. • More community health resources in more places,for more people. - The public perception and reality will be that Auburn is a safe place. How it will happen: • By applying sound environmental design, implementing housing and neighborhood maintenance standards, building and/or financing infrastructure that connect the community, and investing in recreation amenities and safety features. • By promoting and supporting programs in businesses, non-profits, and public agencies that provide healthy food and lifestyle options - By proactively planning and preparing the City for unanticipated natural events and by implementing regulatory requirements that mitigate exposure to natural hazards. • By proactively planning and preparing the City to mitigate for and adapt to climate change and its associated effects. • By developing programs that provide technical and/or financial assistance to ensure quality development and improve substandard housing, neighborhoods,and spaces. • By budgeting appropriately to maintain City services that provide direct benefits to public safety, housing, neighborhoods,and community health and wellness. • By connecting healthcare and health resource providers with all populations of the City. Enhanced quality of life through safe,walkable neighborhood design, lighting,and access to parks, grocery stores,schools, medical services, and community centers should be available to all Auburn City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 20 ORD.E Page 91 of 751 residents. Implementation of strategic partnerships with the medical community and regional • recreation entities should ensure opportunities for a healthy lifestyle for all people, whether youth or senior, rich or poor. As the City evolves and the community changes, police,fire, maintenance,and volunteer services will continue to be essential in making sure Auburn grows together. • SCity of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 21 ORD.E Page 92 of 751 Service We will be an efficient,approachable, and responsive City government. What it will look like: • In the long-term interest of the City's tax payers and rate payers, the City will construct and operate high quality infrastructure. • A transparent, responsive, and competent government and staff that will be proactive, accessible,and approachable. • Residents and businesses will have equal access to and be highly engaged with City officials and staff. • Residents and businesses will be highly engaged through volunteer service. What it means: • Infrastructure assets that have a long life, require fiscally sound and environmentally appropriate upkeep, conform to uniform standards, and are in the best interest of tax and rate payers. • Multiple avenues of communication. • Government processes and services that are available to all segments of the population, through multiple mediums and convenient means. How it will happen • By continuing to refine and enforce standards that ensure infrastructure assets added to the City system are of the highest quality. • By utilizing existing and emerging technologies to better communicate, interact and make available the full range of programs and services to all populations. • By developing and implementing new and different citizen engagement methods including a citizen civics academy,community and business roundtables, and enhanced social media communications. • By capitalizing on partnerships with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, businesses, developers, non- profits, faith-based organizations, transit agencies,school districts, Green River College, and other governmental agencies. The City will be judicious with the resources given by its residents and businesses, and efficient in managing the budget and resulting services. In order to streamline our business practices,the City will be forward-thinking, resourceful, innovative, responsive, informed,aware,and considerate of long-term goals and results. The City, along with our engaged volunteer, philanthropic, and business communities, will strive to advance social, fiscal, technological, and infrastructural health. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 22 ORD.E Page 93 of 751 Economy • We will provide a diverse and vibrant local economy with employment, retail and entertainment opportunities for citizens and a growing marketplace for local and regional-scale businesses. What it will look like: • There will be a range of retail, industrial, manufacturing, and service businesses that start, grow, and expand in an environment that is conducive to success and corporate community participation. • A wide compliment of retail, service and dining options will cater to local needs, attracts visitors and encourage consistent patronage of local businesses. • There will be a robust marketplace where people can and want to live, work and play in Auburn. What it means • Businesses that stay and grow in Auburn, while businesses from other cities, regions, and states are attracted to locate and invest here. • Investments in physical amenities and an environment that attracts people to live here, which includes having attractive, resident-serving-businesses. • People and goods that move safely and efficiently throughout the City. • Increases in sales tax and property tax revenues for the City through targeted economic development and recruitment efforts. • Targeted employment recruitment to enhance the diversity and ability of employees to shop in the City. How it will happen. • By implementing economic development strategies that focus on investments in our community. • By developing and implementing an economic development strategic plan to guide policymaking and financial investment decisions. • By facilitating development and attracting businesses that capitalize on the City's regional economic amenities, including, but not limited to,those of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. • By making purposeful and strategic investments in public infrastructure and amenities that further promote the City as an attractive place to invest and do business. • By maintaining a City quality of service that provides the business community with certainty, support and proactive decision making. The City will promote sustainable and diverse industries through multiple means of moving people and goods and infrastructure supporting that movement. The City will also develop policies that encourage siting of businesses that share mutual benefits,a healthy local and regional marketplace, innovative industries,and environmentally responsible development patterns that foster a balanced,flexible,and resilient economy. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 23 ORD.E Page 94 of 751 Celebration We will celebrate diversity and come together to teach, learn, and have fun. What it will look like: • Auburn will have a thriving and expanding arts and culture community. • There will be events, amenities, and attractions that draw people to congregate and socialize. • The community is inclusive and proud of its history.social,ethnic,economic, and cultural diversity in the people who live, work and play in Auburn. What it means: • People from all parts of Auburn are engaging in both city-wide and neighborhood initiatives. • Auburn's future is shaped by a broader demographic cross section of its citizenry. • Event programming ensures that there are opportunities for neighborhoods and cultures to celebrate their identity. How it will happen: • By developing physical and social infrastructure that encourages and enables more people to practice and showcase their art. • By finding ways to entice new and expanded participation through strategic event planning. • By utilizing technology to find new audiences and increase the amount and quality of information distributed. • By having a diverse cross-section of property owners, business owners, non-profits, governments (including tribal),faith-based organizations, and others who discuss Auburn's future and take actions to make it their premier community. One of the things that makes Auburn special is our diversity: different people have pride in their culture,while respecting the differences in others.This variety adds strength and style to our places and spaces.These distinctive places,while often reverential of a specific culture,feel open and inviting because there is room for everyone. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 24 ORD.E Page 95 of 751 Environment We will protect the natural environment, preserve open space, and create safe and appropriate access. What it will look like: • Residents and visitors will enjoy open spaces and environmentally sensitive areas, while encouraging the appreciation of their importance and beauty. • The built environment will respect the natural landscape in a way that protects ecosystem function. • Natural resource protection will be supported and celebrated by City leadership and the community. What it means: • Open spaces that are accessible to allow people to connect with the natural environment. • Management of impacts to natural resources from new development are considerate of their sensitivity and importance. • The City proactively implements fiscally prudent policies and procedures that are based on best practices and available science to mitigate and adapt to present and projected future effects of climate change. • Sensitive environmental sites are designated and managed as community environmental services. • How it will happen: • By continuing the application of regulatory tools as an important part of environmental protection-in order to ensure that new development, redevelopment, land management, and property use do not degrade the environment. • By identifying particularly sensitive properties for protection through purchase,easement acquisition,or other means. • By seeking out opportunities on public and private property for restoration or enhancement of existing sensitive areas. • By City leaders and staff placing significant emphasis on policies and financial investments that protect our natural resources. • By continued coordination with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe for the identification and protection of sensitive areas and natural resources important to both the Tribe and the City. The City will protect and preserve our environmental resources and heritage through responsible and balanced policies and partnerships.Auburn residents will benefit from environmental amenities such as parks and urban trails that enable walking and biking throughout our City.The City's policies will incorporate best practices and creative means to balance current challenges of environmentally sensitive areas with property rights. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 25 ORD.E Page 96 of 751 Sustainability We will balance natural resource protections,economic prosperity, and cultural vibrancy in order to build a thriving and long-lasting community. What it will look like: • Natural resource protections, economic prosperity and cultural vibrancy will be continuously and conscientiously balanced in City policy and financial decisions. • The community will be educated,equitable and prosperous. • The City and community's collective actions will consider future citizens and the healthy development of Auburn. • Auburn is a resilient community. Its neighborhoods, infrastructure, and economy thrive and remain healthy in the face of global climate change and its associated effects. • Cultural diversity will be supported and strengthened through the City's policies, financial practices, and policy implementation actions. What it means: • Citizens, business owners, government, non-profits,and a development community that promote and implement practices that contribute to an environmentally-responsible Auburn. • City leaders and staff that are committed to implementation of policies that consider both short- term and long-term economic, social, and environmental conditions and effects. • The City will have developed and implemented action plans that identify and achieve sustainability goals and objectives. How it will happen: • By City leaders adopting sustainability in its broadest meaning as a core value and function of Auburn's delivery of local government services. • By City leaders continually and consciously creating policies, actions and strategies that reflect the community's values. • By inviting citizens and businesses to participate in the development and implementation of Auburn's sustainability strategies,and challenging them to embrace sustainability in their individual and collective actions. To ensure healthy Auburn for future generations, we must consider long-lasting effects of our actions on community health,economic viability,the environment,and issues of equity. This means embracing change through inclusivity and balancing current and future needs. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 26 ORD.E Page 97 of 751 • Policy Elements Policy Elements in the Comprehensive Plan provide a finer level of detail for different subject areas. Policy Elements are an extension of the Core Plan and are designed to implement the broad goals, policies and actions contained herein. Furthermore, the Policy Elements reflect the vision and values enumerated in the Core Plan. Specific Policy Elements are listed as follows: Land Use Policy Element Housing Policy Element Capital Facilities Policy Element Utilities Policy Element Transportation Policy Element Economic Development Policy Element Parks and Open Space Policy Element In this section each Policy Element is identified and described. The Core Plan provides the • foundation upon which each Policy Element is built by including. Broad goals that relate to each value, as well as general policies and actions that will guide us to our vision of Auburn in 2035 are also included in the following descriptions. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 27 ORD.E Page 98 of 751 Land Use Policy Element Goals: 1. Character: Buildings and developments are planned and constructed using innovative architectural and site layout techniques that emphasize social interaction and safety. 2. Wellness: Residential, commercial, and recreational areas of the City are joined by a system of trails and paths so that there is less reliance upon the use of vehicles. 3. Service: Citizens are aware of the City's vision, have access to policies and information, and feel that they have a voice in the outcome of future land use proposals. 4. Economo:There is a robust mix of uses and options that make living, working and shopping in Auburn desirable. 5. Celebration: Neighborhoods and districts have been identified and are distinguishable through the use of signs, marketing materials,and sub area plans. 6. Environment: Our rivers,streams,wetlands, habitats and other natural resources are identified, preserved and protected for future generations. 7. Sustainability: Land use activities and developments incorporate low impact development,crime prevention through environmental design,and other sustainable development practices. Land Use Description: The Land Use Policy Element is the focal element of this Plan that is then supported by all other elements of the Plan. It illustrates where the community should or should not develop,the anticipated scale and intensity of development, and how various land uses relate to each other. The Land Use Element lays the foundation for what the community will look like, how it will change and grow, and where different types of land activities will be established. Auburn's overall existing land use pattern is checkered,somewhat random and disconnected. Much of this is due to the manner in which Auburn has expanded in the last 20 years. The annexation of Lakeland Hills absorbed what became a community with wide landscaped thoroughfares, contemporary architecture, and a more affluent demographic. The West Hill and Lea Hill annexations brought relatively rural lands with a wide mix of residential densities and rural levels of infrastructure, where residents feel a stronger attachment to commercial centers located outside of Auburn. To the southeast, Auburn transitions into a community with an entirely different character. The area along Auburn City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 28 ORD.E Page 99 of 751 Way South passes back and forth between the City of Auburn and the Muckleshoot 4111 Reservation. To the southwest and north,Auburn is a mix of auto centric commercial corridors, light industrial/warehousing, and aging single family homes. Historic downtown Auburn has a more urban appearance with a traditional main street, regional transit center, and vast opportunity to become a vibrant and walkable city center. The existing land use pattern is also greatly influenced by the presence of major highways, rail lines, physical land forms and natural features. The Green River,White River, Highway 18, Highway 167, bluffs of West Hill,slopes of Lea Hill, and Burlington Northern and Union Pacific rail lines provide both opportunities and barriers. They serve as landmarks when identifying neighborhoods,obstacles for connecting the community, preservation corridors, and marketing features. Lea Hill: Lea Hill is bound by the Green River, Highway 18, S. 277th St., and Kent. Much of this area was annexed into Auburn in 2008. It includes Green River College,a relatively small commercial center, a golf course, several schools, and a mix of low density rural uses intermixed with traditional suburban residential developments. During the Imagine Auburn visioning exercise Lea Hill residents indicated that they desire more parks and trails,access to more neighborhood scale businesses, and safer neighborhoods. Lea Hill residents have • a stronger connection to Kent and Covington due to both perception and reality that commercial services are more expansive and convenient at these locations. The Bridges subdivision is an island in the middle of Lea Hill that is within the incorporated city limits of Kent. (Insert Map) West Hill: West Hill is bound by West Valley Highway, 51st Ave S, and permanently protected agricultural lands. It is comprised of different scales of residential development and lacks commercial services. West Hill residents have a stronger connection to Federal • Way due to the perception that commercial services are more expansive and convenient at these locations. (Insert Map) Lakeland Hills: Lakeland Hills is partially within King County and partially within Pierce County. It is bound by West Valley Highway, Kersey Way, the White River, Lake Tapps, and Sumner. The majority of Lakeland Hills is comprised of a Planned Unit Development(PUD) that has a commercial center and a mix of single family homes, townhomes,and some • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 29 ORD.E Page 100 of 751 apartments. Additionally,there are undeveloped areas of Lakeland Hills that are outside of the PUD that consist of a mix of traditional residential subdivisions and rural lands. Lakeland Hills residents have a strong association with their own community,as well as Bonney Lake and Sumner to the south. Internally, it is a well-connected community where residents have good access to trails and several parks. However, it is not well-connected to areas outside of Lakeland Hills. Lakeland Hills has a very limited amount of affordable housing, senior housing,and multi-family housing. (Insert Map) Downtown Auburn: Downtown Auburn is characterized by a traditional Main Street that is bisected by major corridors such as M Street,Auburn Way, Auburn Avenue, Division Street, C Street, and the Interurban Trail. It is comprised of a mix of new and old commercial buildings and uses,several civic buildings and uses, a regional transit center, a regional medical center,and Auburn High School. Downtown Auburn offers immense opportunity for a walkable, mixed-use center with easy access to Sound Transit. There are several public spaces that are interspersed throughout downtown that can be used for celebrations,events,and displays. (Insert Map) North Auburn: North Auburn is bound by S. 277th St., West Valley Highway, the Green River, and the Downtown Urban Center. The primary corridors of Auburn Way North, Harvey Road,and 15th Street NW/NE are primarily auto centric commercial thoroughfares. West Valley Highway,A Street NE/B Street NW, and 37th Street NW/NE are the City's principal warehousing and light industrial corridors. I Street NE serves as an alternative • north south route for a number of residential communities. Significant features in this community include the Auburn Way North auto mall and the Auburn Environmental Park. Interspersed throughout North Auburn are a number of residential communities, most of which are between 40 and 100 years of age, with a few recently developed subdivisions. (Insert Map) South Auburn: South Auburn is bound by the Downtown Urban Center,West Valley Highway, Algona, the White River, Auburn Way South and M Street SE. The primary corridors of Auburn Way South, 15th Street SW, and A Street SE are primarily auto centric retail and service commercial thoroughfares. West Valley Highway and C Street SW are primarily light industrial and warehousing corridors. Significant features in this community City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 30 ORD.E Page 101 of 751 are the Les Gove Community Park campus, the Outlet Collection, Game Farm Park, Boeing, • Region 10 headquarters for the Federal Government's General Services Administration and Social Security Administration, BNSF's Rail Yard, as well as the interchange of Highway 18 and Highway 167. During Imagine Auburn,feedback focused primarily on the need to address crime and safety. (Insert Map) Southeast Auburn: Southeast Auburn begins at the base of the hill where Auburn Way South climbs to the Muckleshoot Casino and extends out to the Auburn Adventist Academy. This area is bound by the White River to the south and the Green River and bluffs to the north. Auburn Way South is the primary corridor through this area, which weaves in and out of the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation. While the properties along Auburn Way South are primarily auto-centric commercial uses, the corridor is flanked by a number of residential communities that are located immediately behind the businesses. During Imagine Auburn, residents expressed concern over the high volume of traffic through this corridor as visitors travel to the White River Amphitheater just outside of the City. There were additional traffic concerns during commute hours as people travel south towards Enumclaw. Citizens also expressed unease over the appearance of Auburn Way South. • (Insert Map) Land Use Categories Residential: The Residential land use category will include several types of residential zoning designations ranging from low density areas with significant environmental constraints or that lack urban infrastructure to high density multi-family designations where the goal is to intensify and densify population. Residential land use designations will be comprised of a diverse arrangement of multiple densities where a pattern of mixed densities are preferred over a single density throughout the zone or neighborhood. This will be accomplished by allowing greater density in exchange for the incorporation of high quality and innovative architectural design,greater neighborhood connectivity, compatibility with the natural environment, installation of community amenities, crime prevention through environmental design,and techniques that ensure compatibility between other uses and communities. Commercial: The Commercial land use category will include zoning designations that provide a wide range of retail, entertainment, and service uses and activities. Zoning designations within this category will range from auto-centric corridors to pedestrian and transit oriented mixed use districts. When defining zoning boundaries and developing • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 31 ORD.E Page 102 of 751 strategies, attention will be given to the appropriateness of the types of uses and activities, the bulk and scale of developments, compatibility with surrounding activities and the environment,accessibility and connectivity, and consistency with the City's economic development objectives. Industrial: The Industrial land use category will include zoning designations that provide an opportunity for warehousing, distribution, transportation, light industrial,storage and manufacturing uses. Despite the traditional perception of how these types of uses look and function, zoning designations and development standards will reinforce that it is equally important that these areas remain attractive in their appearance and that they be connected by adequate motorized, non-motorized and multi-modal transportation infrastructure. Public/Institutional: The Public and Institutional land use category will include zoning designations for open space, public space. and preserved lands. Properties such as parks, environmentally protected areas,significant utility properties and corridors, and institutional uses will be located within the zoning designations of this land use category. Zoning designations will distinguish between active public parks where people are encouraged to congregate; passive areas intended to be left undisturbed,and uses such as schools and fire stations. Due to the nature of the types of uses and activities allowed within this category, zoning boundaries tend to be drawn around individual properties or a small collection of properties. Special Planning Areas: Special Planning Areas are districts within the City where a Plan has been developed, adopted, and incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan. A Special Planning Area may function as an overlay that is supplemental to the underlying zoning designation or as a replacement of the underlying land use category and zoning designation. Special Planning Areas serve a purpose that seeks to enhance economic development opportunities, environmental protection,or master planned developments. Overlays: Overlays are supplemental to the underlying land use category and zoning designation. Overlays provide supplemental policy language for urban separators, impression corridors, gateways, and potential annexation areas. Overlays are delineated and assigned because there are extraordinary circumstances that warrant additional and specialized planning emphasis in a particular area of the City. Land Use Policies: 1. Require building design standards for multi-family, mixed use, and non-residential structures to ensure unique and high quality architectural forms,shapes and materials. . . _ , City of Auburn j Core Comprehensive Plan Page 32 ORD.E Page 103 of 751 2. Require site design standards for multi-family, mixed use, commercial and residential • development proposals that provide connectivity between and through sites,adequate public gathering spaces,sustainable development practices, and efficient provision of utilities and streets. 3. Engage in strategic planning of identified corridors and gateways which include an emphasized level of planning, designing, improving, regulating,and maintaining those areas that provide the most visible impression of Auburn. 4. Delineate neighborhoods and districts and develop strategies for creating greater neighborhood identity that reinforces the concept of"One Auburn". 5. Identify commercial, residential and recreational destinations that should be joined by paths and trails with the overall goal of creating a citywide infrastructure that is fully connected. 6. Develop downtown Auburn into a safe,walkable community,that has attractive public plazas and buildings, and an engaging streetscape through planning, regulation, and capital improvements. 7. Identify, protect, preserve and restore Auburn's environment and natural resources. 8. Implement measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. 9. Develop vehicular gateways into Auburn into well signed,attractive and prominent • entry points. 10. Establish sign controls that reduce sign clutter and strive for a long term outcome where attractive buildings, thoughtful sign design, and vegetation dominate the landscape instead of poorly placed and designed signs. 11. Establish parking standards that limit the overall number of spaces and where landscaping and site layout softens the visual impact of large parking lots. 12. Incentivize good community design by allowing increased height, density, intensity and other standards. 13. Ensure harmonious transition between land uses and zoning designations through the use of setbacks, vegetation, building orientation, or architectural design. 14. Employ Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) when designing communities and development proposals. 15. Support efforts and programs such as neighborhood watch, national night out, and other activities that bring residents together. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 33 ORD.E Page 104 of 751 Short Term(2016 thru 2018) 1. Update city zoning and development regulations to be CDPW- City Council, consistent with the Core Plan and Land Use Policy Community Planning Element. Development Commission, Mayor's Office,City Attorney 2. Update the city zoning and development regulations to CDPW- City Council, be consistent with National Pollution Discharge Community Planning Elimination System requirements. Development, Commission, CDPW- Public Mayor's Office,City Works Attorney 3. Implement the recommendations of the Main Street CDPW- Mayor's Office, Urban Design Plan. Community CDPW-Public Development Works,Downtown Association, Chamber of Commerce, Business and Property Owners 4. Prepare an Auburn Way South Corridor Improvement CDPW- Mayor's Office,State Plan. Community Department of Development, Transportation, CDPW-Public Business, MIT,and Works Property Owners 5. Develop a connectivity strategy that lays the foundation CDPW- Mayor's Office, for joining commercial,residential and recreational Community Parks,Utility areas. Development, Providers CDPW-Public Works 6. Update the City's Greenhouse Gas Inventory and CDPW- All City Departments Climate Action Plan Environmental Services 7. Develop a Sustainability Element of the Comprehensive CDPW- All City Departments Plan. Environmental Services 8. Continue ongoing support to the City's Neighborhoods Mayor's Office All City Departments program and utilize the program to strengthen relationships between neighborhoods and the City. Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 9. Identify neighborhoods and develop strategies for CDPW- Mayor's Office promoting awareness. Community Development 10. Develop and implement a citywide greenhouse gas CDPW- All City Departments City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 34 ORD.E Page 105 of 751 reduction plan. Environmental • Services 11. In 2021,update Land Use Policy Element. CDPW- City Council, Community Planning Development Commission, Mayor's Office, City Attorney 12. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- City Council, with update to Land Use Policy Element Community Planning Development Commission, Mayor's Office,City Attorney Long Term (2026 thru 2035) 13. In 2028,update Land Use Policy Element. CDPW- City Council, Community Planning Development Commission, Mayor's Office,City Attorney 14. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- City Council, with update to Land Use Policy Element Community Planning Development Commission, Mayor's Office,City Attorney 111/ • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 35 ORD.E Page 106 of 751 Housing Policy Element Goals: 1. Character:Trails, public spaces and outdoor amenities are available which promote social interaction, safety,and healthy lifestyles. 2. Wellness: Buildings and properties are managed to provide a healthy environment and the surrounding landscape is maintained and feels safe. 3. Service: Social and human services that aid in the provision of housing for those in need are supported by the community. 4. Economy: Residential communities are well designed and connected to non-motorized paths and transit service so that residents can afford to shop and work close to home. 5. Celebration: Residents feel a sense of pride and neighborhood identity while promoting the idea of"One Auburn". 6. Environment: Housing is integrated into the natural environment. 7. Sustainable:Adequate and dispersed housing is provided to seniors,the disabled, low income, and all other individuals and families. Housing Description: A sustainable community offers a range of housing types by providing opportunities for people to choose and to afford to live near jobs,shopping, and services. This type of outcome enables shorter trips,the use of alternative transportation, reductions in traffic congestion,improved quality of life,and the economic benefit of residents choosing to spend their income in Auburn. Because we believe that there is strength in diversity, it is a priority to support and enable a robust mix of housing types. Dispersed and extensive housing options enable all segments of society to make choices about where they want to live in Auburn rather than feeling forced to reside in other communities. Creating the opportunity to establish or retain housing stock for seniors and populations who have social, health, and human service needs is particularly important. Housing data demonstrates that Auburn already has a wide range of housing types and housing costs. But as a significant portion of the population ages,there will be an increasing demand for senior housing. While Auburn already has a wide range of this housing type, it is not dispersed throughout the City. Specifically,there are very few senior, affordable, or lower income housing options in Lakeland Hills or West Hill,very few senior options on Lea Hill, and a concentration of senior and low income options in the Valley. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 36 ORD.E Page 107 of 751 The preservation and renewal of older neighborhoods is an important consideration for • retaining a mix of housing types,as well as community character and history. Auburn's housing stock is older and much of the rental housing stock is in fair to poor condition. While Auburn is not proactively seeking to eliminate affordable housing, there is a reality that some of the housing stock is at the end of its life. There must be a conscious effort to understand and identify which properties are at the end of useful life and which properties have renovation potential. Perhaps most importantly, the City must ensure that redevelopment and renovation does not result in a wholesale loss of affordable housing stock. Auburn's average and median household size suggests that there is a need to provide housing for both small and large households. Auburn's average household size is 2.67 compared to 2.40 in King County and 2.59 in Pierce County,while our average family size is 3.22 as compared to 3.05 and 3.09 in King and Pierce Counties, respectively. While these average figures are higher than our neighbors, we also have a higher percentage of single parents with children. These data strengthen the conclusion that there is a need for less traditional housing,which include accessory dwelling units, cottage housing, townhouses, apartments, and condominiums. Housing data, national trends, and City experience also • conclude that we will likely see increasing demands for larger houses that accommodate multi-generational families living together. Housing Policies: 1. Residential neighborhoods and buildings will be designed and maintained to support safe and active living that is connected to multimodal transportation options. 2. Support efforts to retain and create more types of housing with a broader mix of affordability in all of Auburn's residential and mixed use neighborhoods. 3. Implement and promote measures that enhance public safety such as neighborhood watch, crime prevention through environmental design, and expanded access to law enforcement resources. 4. Organize actions that influence and incentivize the retention and maintenance of the existing housing stock and their surrounding environs. 5. Implement strategies that lead to the adequate provision of dispersed affordable housing for moderate, low,and very-low income households and residents in need. 6. Support efforts that are intended to connect human, health,and social services to residents in need. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 37 ORD.E Page 108 of 751 7. Develop and support programs that help inform residents of their options, available services, and rights to healthy and affordable housing. 8. Strengthen our partnerships with other agencies and communities to help bolster and steady the supply of housing options and supportive services so that there is greater equity in the region. 9. Monitor spatial and quantitative trends in housing supply, affordability, and diversity for Auburn and other King and Pierce County municipalities and make appropriate policy, regulatory and programmatic adjustments in response to data findings. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 38 ORD.E Page 109 of 751 • Short Term (2016 thru 2018) 1. Develop a monitoring program that defines the tools CDPW- Police,King County, and metrics that describe housing condition,supply, Community Pierce County availability,location,crime rates,and housing type. Development 2. Evaluate city zoning regulations to ensure that CDPW- City Council, Planning accessory dwelling units,clustered housing,cottage Community Commission,Mayor's housing,townhouses,etc.are allowed within Development Office,City Attorney appropriate residential and mixed use zones. 3. Utilize the existing city rental housing business license CDPW- CDPW-Business and program and requirements to educate multi-family Community Budget,Police,Multi- property owners about Auburn's goals,policies and Development Family Property standards and that holds property owners and tenants Owners accountable for adherence to its objectives. 4. Continue the City's housing home repair program and Administration- CDPW-Community seek ways to expand its use. Neighborhood Development Services Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 5. By neighborhood,inventory housing opportunities for CDPW- King County,Pierce seniors,moderate income,low income,very low Community County income,and persons with disabilities. Develop Development conclusions that can be used to identify areas that are • in need of specific housing types. 6. Work with transit agencies to determine multi modal CDPW- Public Sound Transit,MIT, transportation needs,routes,funding and capital Works,CDPW- Metro,Pierce Transit improvements necessary to serve priority areas. Community Development 7. Develop a joint Muckleshoot/Auburn housing CDPW- City Council,Tribal inventory and needs assessment that is used to Community Council,King County, establish goals and strategies that combine our Development,MIT Pierce County resources for mutual benefit. 8. In 2021,update Housing Policy Element based upon CDPW- City Council,Planning findings and data collected in the monitoring program. Community Commission,Mayor's Development Office,City Attorney 9. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- City Council,Planning with update to Housing Policy Element Community Commission,Mayor's Development Office,City Attorney Long Term (2026 thru 2035) 10. In 2028,update Housing Policy Element based upon CDPW- City Council,Planning findings and data collected in the monitoring program. Community Commission,Mayor's Development Office,City Attorney 11. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- City Council,Planning with update to Housing Policy Element Community Commission, Mayor's Development Office,City Attorney v City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive PlanPage 39 ORD.E Page 110 of 751 Capital Facilities Policy Element Goals: 1. Character: Our capital investments have been strategically deployed and have resulted in a targeted mix of streets, parks, amenities and trails that serve the majority of communities. 2. Wellness: Capital facility planning, budgeting, design and construction incorporate principles and concepts that promote a healthy lifestyle. 3. Service: Revenue sources and budget allocations have been identified that support both the construction, provision, and on-going high quality maintenance of capital facilities and public services. 4. Economy: Our capital facilities are a marketing asset that causes businesses and residents to seek opportunities to locate here. 5. Celebration:We design, construct, and utilize our parks and streets so that we can gather on holidays, listen to music, attend parades,watch movies,view art, observe nature, and enjoy other community events. 6. Environment: Capital improvements are designed and constructed in a manner that employs a higher standard than the minimum required under the law. 7. Sustainable:We have fully implemented a capital investment philosophy that values the long term outcome over the short term expense. Capital Facilities Description: Capital facilities are those facilities that are owned and operated by the City. The Capital Facilities Policy Element is made up of a collection of documents that include the City's 6- Year Capital Facilities Plan, the Comprehensive Water Plan,the Comprehensive Sewer Plan,the Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan, and the Capital Facilities Plans for each school district and the Valley Regional Fire Authority. Additionally, although the Parks and Recreation Policy Element and the Transportation Policy Element are standalone documents,they too are a component of the Capital Facilities Plan because they include both short and long term investments in developing and maintaining City-owned facilities. The provision and sizing of facilities, such as utilities and streets,can influence the rate, timing,and ability for growth and development that occurs within the City. Timed provision of facilities also ensures that new development can be assimilated into the existing community without serious disruptions or adverse impacts. This plan establishes policies to allow development only when and where all public facilities are adequate or can be City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 40 ORD.E Page 111 of 751 made adequate,and only when and where such development can be adequately served • by public facilities and services consistent with adopted level of service standards. Public facilities include public utilities, streets, parks, municipal buildings, fire and police services, technology and communication systems, K-12 school systems, and waste and recycling services. Capital Facilities Policies: 1. Development will only be permitted where there is a positive determination that concurrency and level of service standards have been met. Levels of service shall be established within,or by way of, each capital facilities document and/or Policy Element. 2. Lands designated for urban growth shall have urban levels of public facilities prior to,or concurrent with, development. If adequate public facilities do not exist and public funds are not committed, proposed development activities must provide such facilities at their own expense. 3. New connections to the City's sanitary sewer, water, and/or storm drainage systems, shall contribute their fair share toward the construction and/or financing of future or on- going projects to increase the capacity of those systems. 4. The City will coordinate with other utility purveyors within the City of Auburn to ensure • that adequate facilities exist or are planned in underserved areas. Other utility comprehensive plans are not incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan unless there is a specific City Council action to accept and adopt. 5. The City will coordinate with solid waste providers and King County to ensure that there is adequate and mandatory waste and recycling service provided throughout Auburn. The City will continue to create, support, and implement efforts that expand recycling and re-use. 6. The City will coordinate with each school district and their capital facility planning efforts. A school district capital facility plan is not incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan unless there is a specific City Council action to accept and adopt. 7. The City will coordinate with Valley Regional Fire Authority and their capital facility planning efforts. A fire capital facility plan is not incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan unless there is a specific City Council action to accept and adopt. 8. The City will implement the adopted Auburn Airport Master Plan. 9. The City will seek opportunities to incorporate trails and public spaces as general funding for these allow in its capital facility projects. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 41 ORD.E Page 112 of 751 10. Sustainable development practices will be incorporated into capital facility project design and construction. 11. The siting, design,construction, and improvement of all public facilities shall be done in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Short Term(2016 thru 2018) 1. Implement 6-year Capital Improvement Plans for CDPW-Public City Council,Planning water,sewer,and storm drainage. Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 2. Implement 6-year Capital Improvement Plans for CDPW-Public City Council,Planning Transportation. Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 3. Incorporate Low Impact Development(LID) into City CDPW-Public City Council, Planning Codes and Standards by January 1,2017. Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 4. Implement 7 to 10 year Capital Improvement Plans for CDPW-Public City Council,Planning water,sewer,and storm drainage. Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 5. Implement longer term Capital Improvement Plans for CDPW-Public City Council,Planning Transportation Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 6. In 2021,update Capital Facilities Policy Element. CDPW-Public City Council,Planning Works, Parks Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 7. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW- Public City Council,Planning with update to Capital Facilities Policy Element Works,Parks Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 42 ORD.E Page 113 of 751 Long Term (2026 thru 2035) 411 8. Implement 10 to 20 year Capital Improvement Plans CDPW-Public City Council,Planning for water,sewer,and storm drainage. Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 9. In 2028,update Capital Facilities Policy Element. CDPW-Public City Council,Planning Works,Parks Commission.Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 10. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW-Public City Council, Planning with update to Capital Facilities Policy Element Works,Parks Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development • 411 City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 43 ORD.E Page 114 of 751 Utilities Policy Element Goals 1. Character: Utility corridors serve multi-purpose functions such as non-motorized connectivity and recreational amenities. 2. Wellness:The extension and provision of utility service extends throughout the entire community who has access to safe and reliable utility service. 3. Service: Residents and businesses have access to all forms of reliable utility service including communication, water,sewer, and storm systems. 4. Economy:Through planning, franchise agreements and partnerships, capital improvements are occurring in conjunction with development and redevelopment. 5. Celebration: Technology and amenities are in place that support community events and enhance awareness and accessibility that results in broader participation. 6. Environment: Utility users are leaders in the region and have embraced and deployed alternative energy solutions and conservation measures. 7. Sustainable: New development fully pays for utility extensions and upgrades that are of a quality that is in the best long term interest of the City and avoids ratepayer subsidies. Utilities Description: The primary responsibility of planning for private utilities rests with the utility providers. Clearly, this planning cannot take place without open lines of communication between the City and the utility providers. Puget Sound Energy(PSE) provides electrical and natural gas service to most of the City of Auburn. PSE is an investor-owned private utility,which provides service to approximately 1.2 million customers in a service area that covers 6,000 square miles. With respect to electrical service, PSE builds,operates, and maintains an electrical system consisting of generation, transmission, and distribution facilities. The Northwest Pipeline Corporation and Enumclaw Gas also have gas lines in the southeastern portion of the City. While the Northwest Pipeline Corporation does not serve any customers within the City, Enumclaw Gas has some residential customers in the area of the Adventist Academy. Conventional local telephone service to the City is provided by CenturyLink. CenturyLink offers service to 25 million customers in 14 western states. The facilities in which calls are switched City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 44 ORD.E Page 115 of 751 are call central offices. Typically there are four main lines heading out from each central office • -one in each direction. Auburn's central office is located in downtown Auburn. Long distance service is provided in the area by several providers. These providers have underground fiber optic cables passing through the City of Auburn. Cellular telecommunications provide mobile telephone. Cellular communication companies offer digital voice, messaging and high speed wireless data services to customers. There are several cellular service providers with customers and facilities in the City of Auburn. Regulation of cellular providers is provided by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Cable television service is provided by Comcast through a combination of aerial and underground cables. Several satellite dish companies also provide service within the City but facilities are limited to the satellite dishes affixed to homes. The City is currently negotiating with Century Link on a potential cable franchise. Investor-owned utilities in the State of Washington are regulated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). State law regulates charges,services,facilities,and practices of utilities. Any changes in policies regarding these aspects of utility provision require WUTC approval. • Private utilities include electricity, telecommunications, natural gas,and non-city owned sewer, and water. Utilities Policies: 1. Private utility companies should strive to provide utility services to all segments of the Auburn population and areas of the community. 2. All new utility and telecommunication lines shall be located underground within all new developments. The City will also work with utility companies to relocate existing distribution,service and telecommunication lines underground as a part of system upgrades, urban revitalization,and city capital projects whenever it is economically and technologically feasible. 3. The visual impact of private utilities shall be mitigated through undergrounding, colocation, screening, or other mitigation techniques. Views from private property, rights of way, and the surrounding community shall be considered when mitigating visual impact. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 45 ORD.E Page 116 of 751 4. When granting franchise agreements, right of way permits,and other city approvals to utility providers, evidence shall be provided that documents sustainable development practices that will be incorporated into construction activities. Short Term (2016 thru 2018) 1. Explore opportunities to enhance the use of franchise CDPW-Public Mayor's Office,City fees and taxes. Works,Finance Attorney,IT 2. Review and update the City's Municipal Code for CDPW- Public Mayor's Office,City consistency with any regulatory changes as it relates Works,City Council,CDPW- to franchises. Attorney, Community Innovation and Development Technology Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 3. In 2021,update Utilities Policy Element. City Council,Planning Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 4. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent City Council,Planning with update to Utilities Policy Element Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development Long Term(2026 thru 2035) 5. In 2028,update Utilities Policy Element. City Council,Planning Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 6. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent City Council,Planning with update to Utilities Policy Element Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 46 ORD.E Page 117 of 751 Transportation Policy Element Goals 1. Character: Investments in developing and maintaining our pedestrian, non-motorized and street infrastructure have resulted in the creation of a community that is physically connected. 2. Wellness: Residents, visitors and workers increase utilization of non-motorized forms of transportation. 3. Service:Through partnership with other agencies, public transportation is an available option for navigating the City and connecting to other forms of transportation. 4. Economy: Street surfaces are in a state of good repair allowing people and goods to navigate into, through and out of Auburn. 5. Celebration:As a result of improvements to the transportation infrastructure, combined with modern design techniques,we experience a decreasing frequency and severity of collisions. 6. Environment:Through development of additional non-motorized infrastructure there are fewer vehicular trips per capita. 7. Sustainable:There is an adequate sustained source of financing for long term • investment in our streets, sidewalks, public landscaping, and non-motorized corridors. Transportation Description: The transportation system is a vital component of Auburn's social, economic, and physical structure. The primary purpose of the transportation system is to support the movement of people and goods within the City and connect the City to the broader region. Secondarily, it influences patterns of growth, development and economic activity by providing access to adjacent land uses. Planning for the development and maintenance of the transportation system is a critical activity promoting the efficient movement of people and goods, ensuring emergency access, and optimizing the role transportation plays in attaining other community objectives. The Transportation Policy Element, also known as the Transportation Comprehensive Plan, provides policy and technical direction for development of the City's transportation system through the year 2035. It updates and expands the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan by recognizing network changes since the last plan,evaluating current needs, and identifying standards for future development and infrastructure improvements. The Plan underwent a major update in 2005 and a midterm update in 2009 to incorporate the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas into the Plan. • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 47 ORD.E Page 118 of 751 The Comprehensive Transportation Plan is the framework for transportation planning in Auburn. It functions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system.The Plan evaluates the existing system by identifying key assets and improvement needs. These findings are then incorporated into a needs assessment,which guides the future of the transportation system. This Plan is multi-modal, addressing multiple forms of transportation in Auburn including the street network, non-motorized travel, and transit. Evaluating all modes enables the City to address its future transportation needs in a comprehensive and balanced manner. Transportation Policies: 1. Level of Service (LOS) and concurrency standards will be adopted and utilized when evaluating the transportation impacts and mitigation measures associated with development proposals. New development will pay for all system enhancements necessary to support the development. 2. Engage in coordinated regional transportation planning efforts with King County, Pierce County,Washington State Department of Transportation, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, Sound Transit,and adjacent jurisdictions. 3. Pursue funding and actions that establish public transportation options to all areas of the City. 4. Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID) concepts and strategies into City initiated transportation projects and privately initiated subdivision proposals. 5. Create a pedestrian and bicycle network linking neighborhoods, activity centers, and popular destinations, and promote walkable, bike-able connections to transit service. 6. Increase coordination and integration of land-use and transportation planning to reduce traffic congestion and protect the natural environment. 7. Provide transportation alternatives that meet the needs of seniors and those who are unable to drive. 8. Inform the community of transportation improvements,capital projects, traffic disruptions and alternative methods for avoiding delays. 9. Develop information about alternate modes of travel to encourage visitors and residents to walk and bike. Short Term(2016 thru 2018) 1. Develop financial and capital programming standards CDPW-Public CDPW-Community that establish minimum budget targets for non- Works Development,Finance, City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 48 ORD.E Page 119 of 751 motorized connection improvements. Mayors'Office 2. Develop a Neighborhood Connectivity Element of the CDPW-Public CDPW-Community Comprehensive Plan. Works Development 3. Develop a citywide wayfinding plan with strategies CDPW- CDPW-Public Works, and actions directed at both non-motorized and Community CDPW-M&O vehicle modes. Development 4. Implement the short-term actions outlined in the CDPW- adopted Parking Management Plan Community Development 5. Identify and prioritize vehicular gateways into the City. CDPW- Design and construct gateway entry points. Community Development Moderate Term (2019 thru 2025) 6. Implement the long-term actions outlined in the CDPW- adopted Parking Management Plan, Community Development 7. In 2021,update the Transportation Policy Element. CDPW-Public City Council, Planning Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 8. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW-Public City Council,Planning with update to Transportation Policy Element Works Commission,Mayor's • Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development Long Term(2026 thru 2035) 9. In 2028,update Transportation Policy Element. CDPW-Public City Council,Planning Works Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 10. In 2029, update city zoning regulations to be consistent CDPW-Public City Council, Planning with update to Transportation Policy Element Works Commission, Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development • City of Auburn Core Comprehensive Plan Page 49 ORD.E Page 120 of 751 Economic Development Policy Element Goals 1. Character: Our cultural diversity has been leveraged to bind our community, expand our market,and celebrate cultural traditions. 2. Wellness:We are a safe community with walkable commercial districts where there the perception and reality is that crime activity is low and public safety staffing meets or exceeds the community's expectations. 3. Service: Our economic development strategies focus on supporting the existing business community: as a result, recruitment is minimal because businesses desire to locate here. 4. Economy:We are able to measure and achieve defined targets for manufacturing, service,and retail jobs and revenues. 5. Celebration:We actively promote our local businesses and have been successful at making our citizens more aware of what is available locally as well as attracting visitors from beyond our City. 6. Environment: Our economy is growing and diversifying because of our efforts to protect our rivers,streams, wetlands, and other environmental resources. 7. Sustainable: Residents are staying in Auburn to work and shop and we are widely considered to be a regional dining,shopping and entertainment destination. Economic Development Description: Auburn's economic base drives and shapes the community and region. Auburn's residents and the surrounding region benefit from the jobs and services Auburn's economic base offers. Through the payment of sales, property and other taxes,the City of Auburn can fund and provide services and public facilities which Auburn residents require. It is in the City's best interest to maintain and expand our economic base in unison with implementing all of the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. This section of the plan will help to define the City's goals and policies in this vital area. Economic Development Policies: 1. Attract high wage employment opportunities and sales tax generating businesses to diversify the City's economic base and generate positive secondary benefits for the community. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page SO ORD.E Page 121 of 751 2. Assist business organizations in developing and implementing new or improved 4111 product development opportunities to increase sales tax revenue collections. 3. Dedicate resources to pursue an expanded economic development program for the City. 4. Develop a clear and elaborate City branding strategy. 5. Create an economic development toolbox comprised of programs and incentives to reduce financial, regulatory,and operational constraints for existing or new business growth and expansion. 6. Prioritize the installation of key infrastructure at identified employment areas to facilitate development of these economic centers. Short Term (2016 thru 2018) 1. Adopt and implement a City 10 year Economic Development Strategic Plan Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 2. In 2021,update Economic Development Policy Mayor's Office City Council,Planning Element. Commission,City Attorney,CDPW- Community Development 3. In 2022,update city zoning regulations to be consistent Mayor's Office City Council, Planning with update to Economic Development Policy Element Commission,City Attorney,CDPW- Community Development Long Term (2026 thru 2035) 4. In 2028,update Economic Development Policy Mayor's Office City Council, Planning Element. Commission,City Attorney,CDPW- Cornmunity Development 5. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent Mayor's Office City Council,Planning with update to Economic Development Policy Element Commission,City Attorney,CDPW- Community Development • City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 51 ORD.E Page 122 of 751 Parks and Open Space Policy Element Goals 1. Character:There are a mix of small urban parks, natural areas,sports complexes,and community buildings that offer a full range of recreation service. 2. Wellness: Parks are well advertised, maintained, and are safe locations during all hours. 3. Service: Parks and park programming are accessible to all segments of the population. 4. Economy: Our parks and natural spaces are one of the major reasons that businesses and residents site why they chose to locate here and why they choose to stay. 5. Celebration:There are a mix of large and small parks that are being used for local, neighborhood,city-wide, and regional events. 6. Environment: Parks, open spaces,and natural areas are designated, designed and maintained in a manner that respects the environment and natural setting. 7. Sustainable: Park development and maintenance has an identified long term funding source that ensures that the system grows and improves. Parks and Open Space Description: Parks, arts,open space, and recreation facilities are an essential amenity to maintain a high quality of life in the community. As the population of Auburn grows,the demand for parks, recreational programs, arts and culture, and open space will continue to increase. To maintain Auburn's quality of life,the supply of parks and programs must keep pace with the demand associated with a growing population. Parks and Open Space Policies: 1. Provide and maintain a comprehensive system of parks and recreation programs that serves the needs and desires of the City's residents. 2. Protect and preserve open space and natural areas that incorporate appropriate opportunities for residents and citizens to view and learn about natural systems and habitats. 3. Provide activities and amenities that allow for community interactions and encourage active and healthy lifestyles. 4. Provide a broad variety of recreational and cultural opportunities to all residents. 5. New development will contribute to the development of new parks at a level commensurate with their share of new facility needs. City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 52 ORD.E Page 123 of 751 6. Provide and support community events,festivals,and programs that offer a variety of 110 opportunities for social interaction and contribute to a sense of community. 7. Diversify the funding sources that support the City Parks, Arts and Recreation Department to include public funding, earned revenues, development impact fees,and outside funding sources. 8. Establish regulations and incentives to incorporate parks and trails into subdivisions and other development projects. 9. Support collaboration between agencies, organizations, and businesses on trails marketing, management, and maintenance in recognition of the value of trails to the community and the economy. Short Term(2016 thru 2018) 1. Establish Level of Service (LOS)standards for parks, Parks CDPW-Community open space,arts and service programs. Development 2. Establish a formal fee in lieu of program Parks CDPW-Community Development,City Attorney,Mayor's Office 3. Acquire additional properties for inclusion in the CDPW- Parks • Auburn Environmental Park and develop a Environmental comprehensive management plan. Services 4. Complete and activate the Auburn Youth and CDPW- Public CDPW-Community Community Center Works, Parks Development,Police 5. Complete the Les Gove Community Campus Plan Parks City Council,Mayor's Office,Police,CDPW Moderate Term(2019 thru 2025) 6. Begin identification of acquisition needs based on Parks Level of Service. 7. Develop criteria and strategies for identifying land that Parks,CDPW- CDPW-Community should be preserved as open space and funding Environmental Development mechanisms for acquiring priority lands. Services 8. In 2021.update Parks and Open Space Policy Parks City Council,Planning Element. Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 9. In 2022, update city zoning regulations to be consistent Parks City Council, Planning with update to Parks and Open Space Policy Element Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development SCity of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 53 ORD.E Page 124 of 751 Long Term(2026 thru 2035) 10. In 2028,update Parks and Open Space Policy Parks City Council,Planning Element. Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development 11. In 2029,update city zoning regulations to be consistent Parks City Council,Planning with update to Parks and Open Space Policy Element Commission,Mayor's Office,City Attorney, CDPW-Community Development City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 54 ORD.E Page 125 of 751 • • N + , .� I '-' -—11111111t,t - - p Tti i-t,ti,• S -'gm •"Irt :::: } .10 S �,•y ag .Valk • t`r1 ^��• '' tiR ,.i•'1a7. t., '^..r�s 'r .-.;:A.:- 7' • 'ti ,-•r .i1rF• ..' xf p k`. . �r. .-r - X - h`. �I9 '"Fi..i......_,.;;14. f rye S K ( ' 1.-fir tl : y. •k /K... L • ... . . : ... .,„ ,.*Ai' `,4 , .31 w l.•' •:tl. I, / r{�1 tag L-1 - _ f•.- y,.4 P :, - •rte ••• + _ R r -_ ,,..T,,�u'+i' 2....... ..'' a_ 411 Y�= "' r..'♦ 7 , w. .,�tl. t r� .■ ` .. w w-'a5� ,• • m �Q _ I�::� - - ��' 113E ��nr:'• '. •u C, is i 1 - .. 111 `M .„„, 211-211 i i • irrilI �ea r • t` Isz i�`w wi....eive, gyta j C r .l • • • w • 9 1 r .-;,:_._. i 41...1 1 - '--"..----:-.•-.....---' •--• -.11:e4-..'•*rr '7.4- - �_ x ,, .... . ,, ,.. 1 • .._. 1. �-.� iiir ,.. _ .,. 1 . .....,-''..--r I .. : lillti i ' F - err.. } / �'. l- `_ `• ' Mt? • / ' �1 3 ;. t.� T. �k•r' o- •.1„..‘ +6r r'ti ._ L� •K • J: 7 1FH^•fit'.. -.. •• •� •` ~' 1'`�!• - .;•; • mdf • • ,I* r F• , ,1R fid[ - . s x Iy« Ftp. :.W U,,, ' . I ., • vl 1 NIF JI I ,.It:.fl•. v. , ulwln 'q.. • •r of 44 •'''• •J”•74,r 7-114,„,... _........ , ,,,,,,,,..„:„,,,. , , . ____. _..... , , ._ Residential .- ii- 5 „` - ' — _•, Residential Conservancy w Ik.ti s „ I i.� I,, is i , Single Family r - • Residential Transition t' • '�.r —_ Multi Family s — .� t II Residential Mixed Use .." i Commercial i x. p l, �. 1 I' • Downtown Urban Center '-; -., -;'-- ''-"'^"''-I '' Neighborhood Commercial : ,. - Si • - ,<< - !: Light Commercial i7 -- �^^a^ . r Heavy Commercial r 3j ;r� ` • .081 /4010,111 _-;' -.•21 , r11=1111M1111111111I Industrial ; tX4 4 ' t:.il' .;*i7 l r ,._ .I y,_ - - � �,- � rn wrx �y=ter F , ,�t1E Light Industrial IY/Gi r ,•-. ,R �` n - Heavy Industrial `,�' 1 ' ( "167.2...,...;:,.7.7.._‘,.:,,'......,,t+, >Y r►.�rZ -y .� • ' jg i • ' 5.• ==. L‘..' ''i. . Public&Quasi-Public r'; �a s .,. !► `d' . 4'a� ' � ?: ' ' ai.' w J,.iC" 1 ul 4:-,,:::„::::4.1.....,,,.11::...;..; �� �' s t Institutional C 1�. ,_ ���•.. o -v, ^' .•` ,` _` 4t. `*�,. ..' .+�•�t. K , ll Open Space r tt 11101 Y3 . , I. • Overlays .. , VIM .. -i- 4,,-.114.."..":.:,7.7:4 • • Residential Transition'`$, ,, •i•,! �• .• ,• v\.... I •=''� iM ( f4 1 4sY. Neighborhood Commercial lid y ....A....---.....,,,,, ,�. •-,..•t`...,•.%.••• sir •• • rpl� _ ,1V _, �t� � xJ Regional ^ 3i� i, r .. AI 4 i „ a, ., \ ','. • Urban Separator r • ' •• , .-aistr,it. i '',_t. . r. -•...:.., - - .,.; �'''* - r.--' .t Potential Annexation Areas i • „ '� �'-` • +� ry4'' • {� r Special Planning AreasII. .1/4 .... V4,---., ' - -.: '4 ' s--.' '' . 7 .N.:-.,... • 4 ',..; 1-'',Irf: .. X' ,x � Y. N.V.."Nr... ..4.P.1% :1,...;'‘...04 ..• AUBui DRAFT Comprehensive Land Use Map (10/13/15) w*` WA‘HINt,II"V ORD.E Page I:,..I • /Appendices Appendix A-The Auburn Community Vision Report Appendix B-The Auburn Housing Needs and Characteristics Assessment Appendix C-The Auburn Housing Element Checklist Appendix D-The Auburn Health Impact Assessment Appendix E-The Comprehensive Public Participation Plan Appendix F.1-The King County Buildable Lands Analysis Appendix F.2-The Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis Appendix G-Auburn Airport Master Plan Appendix H -Auburn Community Profile Appendix I -Auburn Greenhouse Gas Inventory S • _ _ City of Auburn I Core Comprehensive Plan Page 56 ORD.E Page 127 of 751 Exhibit 3 AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - VOLUME 1 Land Use Element LAND USE ELEMENT VISION Auburn is a community that is both physically and socially connected. We take pude in the quality of our built environment as well as the beauty and function of our natural environment. Land use patterns are supported by a complete and efficient transportation and utility infrastructure system. Neighborhoods, commercial centers, and parks are attractive, interesting, accessible, and well maintained. Natural rivenne and forested corridors are interspersed throughout the city and offer a sanctuary for fish and wildlife to reside and people to visit so they may observe and learn about the environment. Residents have a strong association with their neighborhood and are engaged and involved in the decisions that steer Auburn into the future. LAND USE CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY Dispersed Land Use Pattern. For the first 100 years of Auburn's existence the land use pattern developed in a relatively logical manner. Auburn was fully contained to the valley floor with a traditional downtown urban center. several north/south heavy commercial and industrial corridors that parallel Highway 167. and a surrounding housing stock built primarily between 1910 and 1960. In the last 30 years the land use pattern of Auburn has changed primarily because of the incorporation of areas to the south, east, and west. Each of the newly incorporated areas has its own identity and land use pattern. Disconnected Communities. Because a significant portion of today's Auburn was settled prior to incorporation, the basic land use patterns and infrastructure have already been established. Furthermore, much of today's Auburn land use pattern was established in either Auburn. the Muckleshoot Reservation. • or prior to incorporation in King County or Pierce County. Given the mix of jurisdictional oversight there are a myriad of different land use policies, regulations, infrastructure standards, and investments that have applied in these areas. This has resulted in a relatively uncoordinated and random land use pattern. It also means that the various communities lack connectivity to each other, have a mix of identities, and are experiencing a change in their character from rural to more urban. Robust Diversity of Land Use. Auburn has a strong mix of housing and industry. Auburn's residential land use pattern includes a variety of densities, ages, and housing type. Auburn's non-residential land use pattern includes a mix of local and regional retail, entertainment, services, manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution centers. This mix of land use is a strength because it exemplifies social, economic, and cultural diversity. Diversity in Natural Resources. Auburn's natural resources include the Green River and its tributaries, the White River and its tributaries, a robust inventory of wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, and mature open spaces. With a strong base to work from, the City and its partners can be strategic about how to better connect and preserve natural areas so that the overall system is enhanced for future generations to enjoy. INTRODUCTION All land within the City of Auburn is assigned a land use designation, which builds off the past Comprehensive Plan Map, the existing land use patter, previously approved sub area plans, topography, natural features, and targeted goals for shifting the character of specified areas. This chapter provides a description for each designation. general criteria for how to assign the designation. and a series of policies a that govern land use within each designation. The Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map contained in the ORD.E Page 128 of 751 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Core Comprehensive Plan shows the location and boundaries for each designation. This map should be consulted together with the written policies of this Plan when decisions about zoning designations, land use activities, and development of public infrastructure are considered. This Section of the document also explains the reasoning and intention behind the Plan Map's land use designations. This should be useful in: • Developing and implementing tools (such as zoning provisions) • Interpreting the Plan Map as it applies to specific regulatory decisions or development proposals • Adjusting or amending the Plan Map when changing conditions or land use markets warrant • Planning for public services and infrastructure Finally, this chapter sets forth special policies intended to address the unique challenges and opportunities of specific locations within Auburn. These specific policies supplement the general goals, objectives and policies found elsewhere in this plan. ORG.! Paye 129 of 751 12 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS 4i, Character Sketch: Residential uses will be comprised of a diverse arrangement of multiple densities. The pattern of one single density in a zone or neighborhood will evolve into increased and mixed densities in exchange for amenities that enhance quality of life. There will be greater connectivity and stronger spatial relationships between neighborhoods through strategic locations of roadway. trail, park, and neighborhood-serving businesses. These amenities will help create localized identity while also linking one area to another. The design and build quality of new construction and infill will be held to a high standard. The City will encourage projects to be unique, innovative, and provide the residents of Auburn true choice. Values: Character - Residential neighborhoods will include amenities. features and layouts that promote interaction amongst residents. Wellness - The design of residential neighborhoods will emphasize safety and non-motorized connectivity. Service - Through outreach and engagement, individual residents and homeowner's associations are connected to and aware of municipal services, events, and activities. Economy - Neighborhoods have a physical and personal connection to Auburn's commercial centers and attractions. People want to move to Auburn because of the commercial and recreational opportunities it has to offer. Celebration - Districts and neighborhoods are identified, promoted and celebrated. • Environment - The built environment will fit into the natural landscape in a way that protects and respects ecosystem function and that preserves native vegetation and soils. Sustainable - Natural resources, economic prosperity, and cultural vibrancy are balanced in a way that builds and maintains a thriving and long-lasting community. General Policies Policy LU- 1. Regulations for new developments and infill should address the following elements: a. Connectivity by multiple means to adjacent subdivisions, nearby commercial hubs, and parks and recreation facilities. b. Relationship to nearby existing or future transit service. c. Useable community amenities and spaces. d. Environmental protection and preservation of natural features. e. Preservation of areas that can support low impact development(LID)techniques. f. Efficient and effective delivery of utility service. g. Innovative design. h. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). i. Long term maintenance considerations. • OR ErElti.T.M.1631•WW1.1*.mblallin1.4114 0 of 751 3 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 Policy LU- 2. As the market and utility availability enable denser development to occur. standards should be developed to maximize density while preserving open space and critical areas. Policy LU- 3. Programs should be implemented to improve the quality of low income neighborhoods and encourage rehabilitation of deteriorating structures and facilities. Policy LU-4. Public and institutional uses may be permitted as a conditional use if designed in a manner which enhances the residential character of the area. Special care shall be given to ensuring adequate parking, landscaping, and traffic circulation to avoid conflict with residential uses. Policy LU- 5. New residential development should contribute to the creation, enhancement and improvement of the transportation system, health and human services, emergency services. school system, and park system. This may be accomplished through the development of level of service standards, mitigation fees, impact fees, or construction contributions. Policy LU- 6. Cluster development is the preferred form of residential development in all residential designations with the goal of preserving natural areas, critical areas, and areas that support low impact development. Where clustering accomplishes these objectives, it should not come at the expense of lost development potential. Variances to lot size, lot dimensions, building height, and other bulk or dimensional standards should be utilized in order to incentivize and promote preservation. Land Use Designations Residential Conservancy Description - This designation should consist primarily of low density residential uses (one dwelling unit per four acres is allowed) and accessory agricultural uses in areas featuring environmental constraints or requiring special protection such as the Coal Creek Springs watershed area, low-lying areas along the Green River, and areas that are isolated from urban services. This designation will serve to both protect environmental features and hold areas for higher density development until such time public facilities become available. Designation Criteria 1. Areas with significant environmental constraints, intrinsic value, or which may pose environmental hazards if developed, such as areas tributary to public water sources; 2. Affords greater protections to environmental features than existing designation: 3. Level of service for property consistent with adjacent residential conservancy properties; or 4. Location, size of properties, and character is consistent with a residential conservancy use. Implementing Zoning Designations Residential Conservancy Policies Policy LU-7. Densities and activities shall be of a very low intensity and shall not compromise OR d� �, 1 of 751 4 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 environmental and watershed resources. Policy LU-8. In addition to single family homes, these larger properties can also be developed • with garages, accessory dwelling units, barns and other accessory outbuildings. Home occupations, agricultural uses, and other allowed non-residential activities may operate out of any type of permitted building, subject to intensity and use limitations. Policy LU-9. Until these areas are served by public utilities (water. sewer, storm services), existing and new development is not expected to be served by public infrastructure, such as urban streets, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lighting, and landscaping. Policy LU-10. As the market and utility availability enable denser development to occur, standards should be developed to maximize density while preserving open space and critical areas. Policy LU-11. Small scale agricultural uses are allowed and encouraged. Commercial activities that are directly related to and support agricultural uses may also be allowed. The procedural standards may vary depending upon the type and scale of agricultural uses and supporting commercial activities. Small scale agricultural uses are allowed and encouraged. Policy LU-12. Land use standards should adequately limit and control excessive accumulation of debris. Where a permitted activity does allow outdoor storage, it should be adequately screened from adjacent properties and roads, as well as ensuring adequate soil and environmental protection. • Policy LU-13. Public. institutional and resource extractive uses which are low-intensity and preserve the environment may be considered as conditional uses. Single Family Residential Description - This designation is the predominant land use category in the City. Maintaining and creating a diverse arrangement of interconnected subdivisions, neighborhoods and communities that have a mix of densities and housing types: linkages with other residential areas and commercial hubs through non-motorized modes, such as pedestrian and bicycling, and vehicular modes will be encouraged. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed single family residential areas: 2. Undeveloped areas that do not meet the designation criteria for other Residential, Commercial, Industrial, or Public/Quasi-Public designations; or 3. Residential Conservancy areas that contain limited critical areas, are served by public utilities (water, sewer, storm services), and meet the development parameters of the Single Family designation. • Implementing Zoning Designations 2ofi51 I5 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT .CTOBER 13,2015 Residential 1 (1 dwelling unit per acre): All properties located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-1. as consistent with the King County Countywide Planning Policies. Residential 7 (7 dwelling units per acre): All properties not located within the Urban Separator Overlay is zoned R-7. Policies Policy LU-14. Accessory dwelling units should play an integral part of promoting infill development and affordable housing and are therefore encouraged within this land use category. Policy LU-15. Home occupations, bed and breakfasts. day cares. and other appropriate uses should be encouraged as viable accessory uses. Policy LU-16. Manufactured homes shall be permitted on single family lots provided they are sited and constructed in a manner that would blend with adjacent homes. Policy LU-17. Provide a variety of housing typologies to suit the needs of various potential residents. Policy LU-18. Density bonuses. outside of the Urban Separator Overlay, should be approved based on the innovations in transportation, stormwater management, and public amenities proposed for the development or adjacent neighborhoods associated with the request. The onus is on the developer to justify density above baseline. Examples of amenities and concepts that justify density bonuses include park space, art. enhanced landscaping, trails that connect to adjacent properties, neighborhood commercial property set asides, use of low impact development techniques beyond the minimum code requirements. incorporation of CPTED concepts, and variation of architecture and housing typology. Residential Transition Description - Residential transition areas are planned to accommodate moderate densities of varying residential dwelling types. Varying intensities within a transition area may be permitted based on adjacent density, intensity, and/or character. Appropriate densities in these areas range from 7 to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single family dwelling to multiple-family dwellings, with larger structures allowed (within the density range) where offsetting community benefits can be identified. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed moderate density residential areas: or 2. Areas that provide a transition between single family and multi-family, single family and non- residential, multi-family and non-residential zones or development, are adjacent and meet the development parameters of the Residential Transition designation. Implementing Zoning Designations OR .. _ ... W..,.. ...__._ P 133 of 751 6 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Residential Transition • Policies Policy LU-19. Density bonuses and flexible development standards should be considered as an incentive for innovative neighborhood design. Policy LU-20. Carefully developed low intensity office, or residentially related commercial uses (such as day care centers)can be compatible. Policy LU-21. Accessory dwelling units should play an integral part of promoting infill development and affordable housing and are therefore encouraged within this land use category. Multi-Family Description - This category shall be applied to those areas which are either now developed or are reserved for multiple family dwellings. Densities may range from 20 to 24 units per acre. These communities are served by transit. have non-motorized connections to surrounding amenities and services, or have access to on-site amenities. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed high density residential or manufactured/mobile home parks: or 410 2. Properties that are connected to Single-Family and non-residential designations by the Residential Transition designation and meet the development parameters of the Multi Family designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Residential 20 (20 dwelling units per acre): All Multi-Family designated land not previously developed as manufactured/mobile home parks are zoned R-20. Manufactured/Mobile Home Park: All previously developed manufactured/mobile home parks are zoned R-RH. Policies Policy LU-22. Development regulations should include density bonuses and flexible development standards to incentivize innovative site and building design, incorporation of open space and public art, non-motorized connectivity to parks and commercial areas, proximity to transit services, supplemental natural resource protection, supplemental use of OPTED, and supplemental use of low impact development techniques. Policy LU-23. Home occupations and shared housing should be allowed in this designation, however, given the high densities, it is appropriate to establish additional restrictions, procedures, and requirements in order to ensure that they are compatible with their surroundings and do not adversely affect the community. • ORG. Pbjt 134 of 751 I7 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Policy LU-24. Live-work units are encouraged. Policy LU-25. Improve the quality of low income neighborhoods and implement programs which encourage rehabilitation of deteriorating structures and facilities the Downtown area, areas between lower density residential uses and more intense non- residential activities, and areas with high levels of transit service and available high-quality services. Policy LU-26. Multi-family development should be subject to building and site design standards. These standards should address the appearance of buildings, compatibility with nearby uses. exterior lighting. connectivity with surrounding properties and uses, the relationship between ground floor spaces and entry ways with the streetscape, and connectivity to nearby non-residential hubs (e.g. shopping centers and schools). Policy LU-27. Provide a variety of housing typologies to suit the needs of various potential residents. Policy LU-28. Establish intensity limitations such as floor area ratios, density, building height, coverage ratios. setbacks, and other standards. Policy LU-29. Access to nearby amenities and health and human services should be considered when reviewing senior housing developments. Policy LU-30. Encourage development of permanent supportive housing to address the homeless population and those with special needs. Policy LU-31. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Mixed Use Description - This category shall be applied to those areas which are either now developed or are reserved for multiple family dwellings. Densities may range from 20 to 24 units per acre. These communities are served by transit, have non-motorized connections to surrounding amenities and services, or have access to on-site non-residential amenities and services. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed high density residential; or 2. Properties that are connected to Single-Family and non-residential designations by the Residential Transition designation or are adjacent to the Multi Family designation. and meet the development parameters of the Mixed Use designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Mixed Use Residential Policies Policy LU-32. Development regulations should include density bonuses and flexible development standards to incentivize innovative site and building design, OR -. _� _ .. - — 5of751 18 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 incorporation of open space and public art, non-motorized connectivity to parks and commercial areas, proximity to transit services, supplemental natural • resource protection, supplemental use of CPTED, and supplemental use of low impact development techniques. Policy LU-33. Live-work units are encouraged. Policy LU-34. Encourage adaptive reuse. particularly of historic properties. Policy LU-35. Consider multiple methods for determining how the mixed use objectives are achieved. For example, in some areas of the City it is acceptable to have a horizontal mixed use design, while in other areas vertical mixed use is appropriate. Policy LU-36. Establish intensity limitations such as floor area ratios. density, building height, coverage ratios, setbacks, and other standards. a ORE e— of 751 I9 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 COMMERCIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Character Sketch: Commercial uses will be wide ranging in terms of scale and type. A mix of businesses, local, regional, and national. will be among the businesses in the various designations and will be carefully located to create balance and maintain appropriateness based on adjacent uses. These commercial areas will be economically vibrant, unique and be active outside of traditional work hours. They will be accessible by foot, bike, car, and public transport. Values: Character - Active gathering spaces, such as parks, plazas. cafes. concert venues. festivals and markets, will be distributed throughout the City; these spaces will be engaging and filled with people interacting. irrespective of culture, age. or income level. Wellness - A variety of healthy food options will be physically and economically accessible to all members of the Auburn community. Service -The City's resources and services are available and utilized by the business community. The business community finds the City approachable, empathetic, and responsive. An open and collaborative dialogue exists to help identify problems and find solutions. Economy - A wide compliment of retail, service and dining options will cater to local needs, attracts visitors and encourages consistent patronage of local businesses. Celebration - Auburn will have a thriving and expanding arts and culture community. There will be events. amenities, and attractions that draw people to congregate and socialize. Environment - Local businesses benefit from Auburn's collection of natural resources and amenities because residents and visitors are choosing Auburn as their home or destination. Sustainable - Local businesses benefit from, and contribute to, a sustainable economy because Auburn is an easy location to start up, maintains opportunity for growth, and has a business friendly economic climate. General Policies Policy LU-37. The commercial uses permitted must be carefully regulated in regards to performance criteria and design. Policy LU-38. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and community-serving retail trade, offices, personal services. and eating establishments. Policy LU-39. Encourage uses that provide health and human services to the adjacent community. Policy LU-40. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Downtown Urban Center Description - This category should be applied exclusively in Downtown Auburn. The area should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and conducive to pedestrian-oriented activities. The ambiance of the downtown should encourage leisure shopping. provide services to local residents and area employees, and provide amenities that attract regional visitors and ORS. _ - - -- •- 7of751 110 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 shoppers. • Designation Criteria 1. Located within the Urban Center boundaries established by the King County Countywide Planning Policies or within the Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundaries. Implementing Zoning Designations Downtown Urban Center Policies Policy LU-41. Vertical mixed use should be encouraged: the location of retail sales and services should predominately be on the ground floor with residential or more retail or services above. However, small free standing commercial spaces may be established as an accessory use to a larger vertical mixed use development. Policy LU-42. Deviations of height, density or intensity limitations should be allowed when supplemental amenities are incorporated into site and building design. Examples of amenities include use of low impact development, use of sustainable site and building techniques, public space and art, transit oriented development, landscaping and lighting, and bike shelters. Policy LU-43. Encourage a broad mix of uses within the Downtown area. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis. • Permitted uses include retail trade, offices. personal services. eating and drinking establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Policy LU-44. Encourage multiple family dwellings, particularly within the upper stories of buildings. Policy LU-45. Drive-in windows should not be permitted to maintain the area's pedestrian environment. Policy LU-46. Parking standards within the downtown should reflect the pedestrian orientation of the area, but also consider parking's impact for economic development. Policy LU-47. Discourage uses which rely on direct access by vehicles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery). Policy LU-48. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Policy LU-49. The downtown should capitalize on opportunities for multi-modal transportation. Policy LU-50. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Neighborhood Commercial Description - Low intensity, small-scale commercial services that meet the daily needs of and • complement the quality of the residential neighborhoods they serve. Commercial uses need to be OR --- .- --"Pat`s'r38 of 751 I 11 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 carefully located (if located within single family residential neighborhoods) or should be buffered from single family residential areas. These areas are characterized by lower traffic generation, fewer operating hours, smaller scale buildings, and less signage than light commercial areas. Designation Criteria 1. Located along arterial or collector streets; 2. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features. or the Residential Transition designation: and 3. Meets the development parameters of the Neighborhood Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Neighborhood Commercial Policies Policy LU-51. The commercial uses permitted must be carefully regulated in regards to performance criteria and design. Architectural style, building height and size, lighting, and signage should be consistent with the surrounding residential properties. Policy LU-52. Permitted uses would consist of small scale local-serving and community-serving retail trade. offices, personal services, and non-drive thru eating establishments. Policy LU-53. Special emphasis will be directed at those accessory activities which can alter the character of these areas into heavier commercial areas. Examples include outdoor storage, location and screening of trash receptacles, loading and unloading zones, and parking lots. Regulations and permit conditions will employ techniques that mitigate light and noise impacts associated with surrounding residential properties. Policy LU-54. Encourage adaptive reuse of existing residential buildings and historic properties. Policy LU-55. Commercial uses will have an orientation that is directed towards adjacent public streets while also providing pedestrian and bike oriented access. Policy LU-56. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for the development associated with the request. Light Commercial Description - This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. Such areas should encourage walkability, leisure shopping, engaging public space. and should provide other amenities conducive to attracting shoppers. ORP _ 9of751 112 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 Designation Criteria • 1. Previously developed light commercial areas buffered from more intense commercial or industrial designations by landscaping or environmental features; or 2. Located along arterial or collector streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features. or the Residential Transition designation: and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Light Commercial Policies Policy LU-57. A wide range of consumer-oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since creating an attractive shopping environment is a primary emphasis. Permitted uses would consist of local-serving and community-serving retail trade, offices, personal services, eating establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Policy LU-58. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should • be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-59. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices. development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. Policy LU-60. Multiple family dwellings are only allowed as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as within the upper stones of buildings. Policy LU-61. Drive in windows should only be allowed accessory to a permitted use, and only when carefully sited under the administrative use process, in order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not compromised. Policy LU-62. Large scale regional retail uses and uses which rely on direct access by vehicles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Policy LU-63. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Policy LU-64. Encourage adaptive reuse, particularly of historic properties. Policy LU-65. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations • in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for ORI v_-I_..._•0 of 751 113 )RAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 the development associated with the request. Heavy Commercial Description - This category is intended to accommodate uses that would also accommodate a wide range of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or vehicular movement. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed heavy commercial areas; or 2. Located along major arterial streets: 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Heavy Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Heavy Commercial: All Heavy Commercial designated land not located within the Northeast Auburn Special Planning Area or located within the Northeast Auburn Special Planning Area, but incapable of meeting the C-MU zoning requirements . Policies Policy LU-66. A wide variety of commercial services oriented are appropriate within this category. This includes, but is not limited to regional scale retail and entertainment uses, commercial uses with outdoor sales areas, drive-in restaurant or other drive in commercial businesses, and commercial services with outdoor storage as an accessory use. Policy LU-67. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces. and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-68. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations. use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. ORD.0 Aay141 of 751 114 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 INDUSTRIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Character Sketch: 411 Industrial uses will become a more integrated part of the physical and social life of the City. Since so many people work in these areas and these companies contribute so much to the financial life of the city, it is important that they are connected through paths, roads and by public transportation. Locations that have access to rail and highways that also encourage intelligent growth patterns will be prioritized. Innovation will be a key requirement of new and infill projects as the City looks to mitigate impacts of production and limit damage to the environment. Values: Character - Buildings, landscaping, and outdoor spaces will be attractive, interesting, well designed, and maintained. Wellness - Risk to life and property from all hazards will be minimized. Properties and businesses are connected to non-motorized corridors which offers alternative means to commute. Service - The city works closely with individuals and organizations to fully understand the demands, needs, and concerns of the industrial community so that the City can sponsor initiatives that help aid in their success. Economy - Cornerstone institutions will strategically expand in regional prominence. As industry grows, land use policy will support efforts to grow within Auburn. Celebration - The Community will be made aware of and celebrate the accomplishments of our local, regional and international leaders in manufacturing, warehousing, and distribution. • Environment - The built environment will fit into the natural landscape in a way that protects and respects ecosystem function. Natural resource protection will be supported and celebrated by City leadership and the community. Sustainable - Industrial uses are contributing to, and supportive of, efforts to build and maintain a transportation system that ensures the people and goods move safely throughout the City and beyond. General Policies Policy LU-69. A wide range of industrial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. Policy LU-70. Outside storage shall be permitted subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location. Policy LU-71. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit. Light Industrial Description - This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of industrial and commercial uses. This designation is intended to provide an attractive location for manufacturing, processing and assembling land use activities that contribute to quality surroundings. A wide 40 variety of appropriate commercial uses in this designation benefit from the location. access, OR X42 of 751 115 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 physical configuration, and building types of these properties. It is distinguished from heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant activities shall take place inside buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictly controlled and permitted only as an incidental part of another use. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed light industrial areas: or 2. Located along high visibility corridors: 3. Provides buffering for heavy industrial areas or is buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Light Industrial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Light Industrial Policies Policy LU-72. A wide range of industrial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. Heavy commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in light industries are also appropriate. These uses include indoor manufacturing, processing, and assembling of materials from previously prepared or raw materials and ancillary and necessary warehousing and distribution of finished goods associated with manufacturing and industrial uses. Policy LU-73. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use. Policy LU-74. Landscaping, sidewalks, and bike paths will be integral parts of site design if a development is located on an impression corridor or located within or adjacent to an identified non-motorized corridor. Policy LU-75. Outside storage shall be permitted subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location. This is to ensure compatibility with adjacent uses. so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases, such storage shall be extensively screened. Policy LU-76. Where a light industrial use is located adjacent to a property with a less intense zoning designation, the light industrial use bears the burden of incorporating techniques that mitigate the visual, noise, dust, and odor impacts. Policy LU-77. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials, as well as substantial emissions, should not be permitted in these areas. Policy LU-78. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed to provide increased ORD.L lady d r43 of 751 116 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 opportunities for sales tax revenue. Policy LU-79. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad Auburn Yard located within • the Railroad Special Plan Area is considered a compatible use at its current level of usage. It is not bound by the policies concerning outside storage under the existing light industrial designation as it was an existing use prior to the development of this policy. Should BNSF decide to reactivate its applications to upgrade the yard to an intermodal facility, the proposal will be subject to the essential public facility siting process as defined in the Capital Facilities Element. Policy LU-80. Upzone requests to the next zone should be approved based on the innovations in transportation and stormwater management and public amenities proposed for the development associated with the request. Heavy Industrial Description - This designation allows the full range of industrial uses, as well as certain heavy commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in light industries are also appropriate. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed heavy industrial areas; or 2. Not located along high visibility corridors: • 3. Is buffered by the Light Industrial Designation or otherwise buffered from all other compatible designations: and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Heavy Industrial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Heavy Industrial Policies Policy LU-81. While this zone should be reserved primarily for the heavier forms of industrial activities, a wide range of industrial activities may be permitted. These heavier forms of industrial activities may include outdoor or semi-enclosed manufacturing. processing. or assembling activities, significant outdoor storage. and uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials. Heavy commercial uses that serve the needs of workers in heavy industries are also appropriate. Policy LU-82. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces. and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of 44 of 751 117 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 permitted use. Policy LU-83. Landscaping. sidewalks. and bike paths will be integral parts of site design if a development is located on an impression corridor or located within or adjacent to an identified non-motorized corridor. Policy LU-84. Where a heavy industrial use is located adjacent to a property with a less intense zoning designation, the heavy industrial use bears the burden of incorporating techniques that mitigate the visual, noise. dust, and odor impacts. OR ..... =PaCitri°45 of 751 118 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 PUBLIC AND INSTITUTIONAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Character Sketch: 4110 Public and institutional uses will occur in both low and high density environments. For passive uses, land and views will be protected: limited access to these areas will be typical. For more active uses, usability and accessibility will be key features and new development will be subject to standards reflecting programmed space and interconnectivity. These spaces will be varied in type, providing service to areas large and small, urban and more rural in character. Sustainable solutions and innovations that are responsive to the native ecology will be typical of public and institutional uses. Values: Character - Community facilities and programs bring people together and connect residents and visitors to our natural resources. Wellness - Multiple recreation options, and nearby trails, parks, activities, and events will be readily accessible to the entire community. Service - Land use policy supports the provision of community, health and human services to all residents. Economy - Residents and visitors seek Auburn as a residence or destination because of its natural resources, community events, and community pride. Celebration -We utilize our open spaces and public facilities to promote who we are, our diversity, and our community pride. Environment - Residents and visitors will enjoy open spaces and environmentally sensitive areas, • while encouraging the appreciation of their importance and beauty. Impacts of new development on natural resources are considerate of their sensitivity and importance. Sustainable - Public and private funds are used to make investments in land preservation. restoration and protection. Public investments in land and facilities are considered for their perpetual or generational value versus short term motivations. General Policies Policy LU-85. The primary purpose of this designation is to address public needs while taking advantage of synergies with the adjacent areas where they are sited. Policy LU-86. Innovative strategies to integrate the uses and sites into the areas where they are sited is encouraged. These strategies should maximize use of the site while minimizing fiscal impacts and impacts to adjacent areas. Policy LU-87. Increase visibility of resources through public information campaigns. Policy LU-88. Appropriate uses include low intensity recreational uses. passive use open areas. protected environmental habitat, stormwater detention facilities, and similar low intensity uses. Open Space Description - This category shall be applied to areas which are owned by a public entity and managed in a largely undeveloped character. It includes parks, watersheds. shoreline areas, • significant wildlife habitats, storm drainage ponds, utility corridors with public access, and areas ORI. '_ __._ .._.. a . s. .,__�_.-_ __ __ ..._ . _._-. 6 of 751 119 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 with significant development restrictions. Designation Criteria 1. Passive parks or undeveloped Parks Department property: 2. Any site containing a significant developmental hazard; or 3. Any site containing open space value suitable for public protection without unduly encroaching on private property rights. Implementing Zoning Designations Open Space Policies Policy LU-89. Active parks that provide sports field, activity and community centers, cemetery's, and public buildings should not be designated as open space. Policy LU-90. Open space lands are primarily designated to provide wildlife and aquatic habitat, flood detention, vegetation and soil preservation, and view shed protection. Land designated as open space may be used for public access to trails, interpretive centers. education opportunities, and other uses and facilities that support the purpose of their designation. Policy LU-91. Increase distribution of open space and increase access to open space amenities throughout Auburn. Policy LU-92. Enhance restoration, preservation and protection of natural resources and critical areas. Policy LU-93. Seek out opportunities to develop recreation and education opportunities on public lands or through public-private partnerships. Policy LU-94. Increase visibility of resources through public information campaigns. Continue to work with regional partners to develop and maintain trail systems that connect Auburn with regional destinations. Policy LU-95. Build on partnerships with school districts to expand public use of school facilities for recreation and exercise, and to improve public access to facilities for this purpose, as appropriate. Institutional Description - This category includes those areas which are reserved for public or institutional uses. These public uses include public schools and institutional uses such as large churches and schools. It is also intended to include those of a significant impact, and not those smaller public uses which are consistent with and may be included in another designation. For example, public uses of an industrial character are included in the industrial designation, and small scale religious institutions of a residential character are included in the residential designation. OR 947of751 P a e 120 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 Designation Criteria • 1. Previously developed institutional uses; or 2. Located along major arterial streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Institutional designation. 5. Properties identified in the Airport Master Plan as Landing Field. Implementing Zoning Designations Institutional Landing Field Policies Policy LU-96. A responsible management entity and the purpose for the institutional designation should be identified for each property interest within this designation. Management policies and plans are appropriate for all lands in this designation. Policy LU-97. Appropriate uses for this designation include facilities that serve the needs of the larger community such as public schools, active parks, city operated municipal facilities, large churches. and fire stations. • Policy LU-98. This designation permits a wide array of uses that tend to be located in the midst of other dissimilar uses. For this reason, special emphasis should be directed at the following: a. The appropriateness of new requests for this designation and the impacts that it may have on the surrounding community. b. Site specific conditions that should be attached to the granting of new requests for this designation that are designed to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community. c. Site specific conditions that should be attached to development proposals that are designed to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community. Policy LU-99. Coordination with other public or institutional entities is essential in the implementation of the institutional land use designation. Policy LU-100. Industrial and commercial uses which are affiliated with and managed by educational institutions for vocational educational purposes may be classified as an institutional use and permitted on a conditional basis. Policy LU-101. For the Landing Field designation. an Airport Master Plan should be developed that establishes the vision, policies, and implementation strategies that govern uses, management principals, and future planning efforts. Uses and activities within and surrounding this designation must comply with the requirements of the • Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). ORD _._.._..... .....__...._ 48 of 751 121 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 OVERLAYS, URBAN GROWTH AREA, AND SPECIAL PLANNING LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Character Sketch: These areas help control growth. protect the environment, and prevent urban sprawl conditions in our City. For a variety of reasons, specific areas exist within the City that require further specificity or focus of land use planning, policy, regulation, or investment. Overlays, urban growth areas, and special planning areas may be designated that help further enumerate a purpose. These areas are to be designated through the Comprehensive Plan and treated as a component of the Land Use Element of the Plan. Values: Each area that is designated as an overlay, urban growth area, or special planning area shall be reflect the values identified in the Core Comprehensive Plan. General Policies Policy LU-102. These land use designations must be consistent with the Growth Management Act (GMA). Puget Sound Regional Council, and countywide planning policies. Policy LU-103. Any proposed changes to these designations must be pursued in coordination with applicable State. Regional and County agencies. Urban Separator Description - Urban separators are areas designated for low-density uses in the King County Countywide Planning Policies. They are intended to be'protect Resource Lands. the Rural Area, and environmentally sensitive areas, and create open space and wildlife corridors within and between communities while also providing public health, environmental, visual, and recreational benefits."There are two primary areas of urban separators, one on Lea Hill and one on West Hill. Designation Criteria 1. Areas designated through the process of annexation. Implementing Overlay Designations Lea Hill Overlay West Hill Overlay Urban Separator Overlay Policies Policy LU- 104. The City is obligated to maintain (and not re-designate) until at least the year 2022, pursuant to the Countywide Planning Policies and an annexation agreement with King County. Policy LU- 105. Urban separators are deemed to be both a regional as well as local concern and no modifications to development regulations governing their use may be made without King County review and concurrence. Therefore, the areas designated as "urban separator"on the Comprehensive Land Use map, will be zoned for ORD' 9 of 751 1 22 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 densities not to exceed one dwelling unit per acre, with lot clustering being required if a subdivision of land is proposed. • Potential Annexation Area Description - Potential Annexation Areas are areas located outside of the municipal city limits of Auburn. They are areas that are anticipated to be incorporated into the City within 10 years of their designation. Designation Criteria - Potential Annexation Areas are jointly developed by cities and the County in which they are located. They are based upon countywide growth projections that are divided between all of the urban growth areas within the respective County. Implementing Designations Potential Annexation Area Policies Policy LU- 106. Auburn's Potential Annexation Area (PAA) is shown on Map . Map also depicts Growth Impact Areas. These Growth Impact Areas are generally adjacent cities or unincorporated County lands in which development that occurs potentially impacts the city of Auburn. • Policy LU- 107. The Auburn City Council may revise the boundaries of the Potential Annexation Area in the future, in response to: a. Amendments to the King or Pierce County Urban Growth Area as specified in the King or Pierce County Countywide Policies b. Discussions between Auburn and adjacent jurisdictions regarding PAA boundaries c. Discussions with Pierce County concerning the designation of PAA boundaries d. Changed circumstances relating to population and employment growth and projections, urban service feasibility, or similar factors. Transition Overlay Description-Transition Overlays are areas that do not have a Residential Transition land use or zoning designation but still require additional emphasis between two different land use designations. Designation Criteria - Areas shows on the Comprehensive Plan land use map that are located between single family and multi family designations; between multi-family and non-residential • designations; and between single family and non-residential designations. .12"alge-'50 of 751 123 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Implementing Designations Transition Overlay Policies Policy LU- 108. Between single family and multi-family: a. Where a multi-family use is proposed to be located adjacent to a single family zone, the multi-family use will bear the burden of providing an adequate transition of land use. Mitigating measures that control light, noise, and dust should be incorporated into multi-family development proposals. b. Provide non-motorized access through the Transition Overlay in order to connect the adjacent land uses. c. Housing size, type, and orientation shall be utilized as a means of providing harmonious transition of the built environment. d. Provide a mix of townhomes, duplexes, cottage housing and small scale multi-family housing. e. Rezones to the Residential Transition zone should not be allowed if it will result in the creation of a Residential Transition island. Policy LU- 109. Between multi-family and non-residential a. Where a non-residential use is proposed to be located adjacent to a multi- family zone, the non-residential use will bear the burden of providing an adequate transition of land use. Mitigating measures that control light, noise, and dust should be incorporated into non-residential development proposals. b. Provide non-motorized access through the Transition Overlay in order to connect the adjacent land uses. c. Provide a mix of townhomes, duplexes, cottage housing and small scale multi-family housing. d. Rezones to the Residential Transition zone should not be allowed if it will result in the creation of a Residential Transition island. Policy LU- 110. Between single family and non-residential a. Where a non-residential use is proposed to be located adjacent to a single family zone,the non-residential use will bear the burden of providing an adequate transition of land use. Mitigating measures that control light, noise, and dust should be incorporated into non-residential development proposals. b. Provide non-motorized access through the Transition Overlay in order to connect the adjacent land uses. c. Housing size, type, and orientation shall be utilized as a means of providing harmonious transition of the built environment. d. Cluster housing in order to utilize natural areas as a buffer. e. Rezones to the Residential Transition zone should not be allowed if it will 124 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 result in the creation of a Residential Transition island • Critical Area Overlays Description — Under the Growth Management Act cities and counties are required to identify, designate and protect critical areas. Critical areas include (a) wetlands, (b) areas with a critical recharging effect on aquifers used for potable water, (c) fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, (d) frequently flooded areas, and (e) geologically hazardous areas. Designation Criteria — Designation of critical areas includes both the criteria that should be applied to the specific type of critical area as well as buffers and/or setbacks that are necessary for the protection of the critical area and/or life and property. Designation of critical areas is based on best available science as it applies to local conditions. Implementing Designations Wetlands Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas Fish and Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas Frequently Flooded Areas Geologically Hazardous Areas • Policies Policy LU- 111. Best available science will be utilized for the specific designation criteria and the associated adopted protection standards and development regulations. Policy LU- 112. Reasonable use provisions will be included within the critical area regulations that ensure a property owner is not denied use of a pre-existing parcel, lot or tract. Policy LU- 113. Exemptions to the critical areas ordinance should be provided for very limited and justified circumstances such as maintenance of existing land uses, work within some types of man made features, limited types of site investigation work, emergency activities, and certain types of invasive vegetation control. Policy LU- 114. Critical area regulations will identify the process and standards for alteration of a critical area and criteria related to mitigation, performance, and monitoring. Special Planning Areas Description - "Special Planning Areas" are Districts, Sub-Areas, Impression Corridors, and Gateways within Auburn that warrant additional emphasis in planning, investments, and policy development. There are a variety of reasons for designating a Special Planning Area, and once designated there are a number of different potential outcomes. Reasons for designating a • ORLi 52 of 751 I 25 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Special Planning Area include: • Areas of high visibility and traffic. These areas create an impression or image of Auburn. It is therefore particularly important to ensure that they are attractive and well maintained. Examples include Auburn Way South and major highway on- and off-ramps. • Land use activities that warrants joint planning. In addition to developing approaches and strategies for the core land use activity, there may be additional emphasis on ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. Examples include, Green River College, the Auburn Municipal Airport, and Emerald Downs Thoroughbred Racetrack. • Neighborhoods in which a resident and merchant live and conduct daily business and leisure. Examples include Downtown, Lea Hill and Lakeland. • Areas where there is a focused desire to create greater physical and economic cohesiveness. These may be large planned developments or clusters. Examples include Auburn North Business Area and Mt. Rainier Vista. • Areas with an existing built environment or an existing regulatory framework that does not, in itself, meet the expectations of the 7 values that underscore the Comprehensive Plan. Examples include the need for multi-modal connections between West Hill and Lea Hill into North and Downtown Auburn. Designation Criteria 1. Districts: The geographic limit of districts and areas that make up the Special Planning Areas extends beyond an alignment with any particular street, trail, river, stream, or other linear corridor. Districts may contain other smaller Special Planning Areas, such as sub-areas. Additionally, districts are generally consistent with the geography of one of the eight "neighborhoods'1 identified in the 2014 City of Auburn Community Vision Report. Generally speaking, districts are identified for the purpose of creating identity. This means that the land use designations and overarching policies and implementing regulations are not going to change from one District to the next. Instead, Districts are important for event planning, establishing park and open space level of service standards, and promoting community identity. Districts (See Map#.#) West Hill North Auburn Lea Hill Downtown South Auburn Plateau Lakeland Southeast Auburn 2. Sub Areas: Sub-Areas are smaller in geography than a district. Though relatively large, multiple sub-areas may be located within a single district. Sub-areas allow for the refinement and recognition of existing unique characteristics within a district. Sub-areas are intended to 1 The eight "neighborhoods" are identified for comprehensive planning purposes only, as neither the City nor its neighborhoods have elected to officially designate the boundaries of City neighborhoods. ORD.! !dyt 153 of 751 P 1 26 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 anticipate, support, and guide long-term growth and redevelopment though planned development and a unique vision for how that area should look and function in the future. It • can also be used to provide flexibility when there is uncertainty regarding how an area may be most appropriately developed in the future. Sub-Area planning emphasizes infrastructure development, appropriate land uses, connectivity throughout the planned area, and connections to multi-modal transportation opportunities outside of the planned area. Thirty-two Sub-Areas currently exist (including the nine economic development strategy areas discussed below). These Sub-Areas are categorized as Identified Areas, Designated Areas, and Adopted Areas. Identified areas have been identified as a Sub-Area within the Comprehensive Plan. Designated Areas have been designated on the Comprehensive Plan Map, which defines detailed boundaries of the area. Adopted Areas include an Adopted Sub- Area Plan that is incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan and establishes the purpose of its designation, goals and policies, and implementation strategies. Sub-Areas can move through the process of Identification, Designation, and Adoption by official action of the Auburn City Council in (three) stages or by a single action. Once adopted, sub-area plans are intended to guide the future development of each respectively adopted sub-area on a planned basis. Uses and intensities within Special Planning Areas are determined for each area through individual planning processes. Each Sub-Area Plan must be consistent with the general goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Key policies of the six Sub-Area Plans are listed below. As an adopted document of the Comprehensive Plan, the Sub-Area Plans are subject to a review, and if necessary, revision to address changes in conditions, issues, or even characteristics of the planned areas. A review and revision of Sub-Area Plan will also include the review and, if necessary, a revision of zoning regulations and design standards. Updated • and future Sub-Area Plans will either supplement existing goals, policies, and implement strategies, or replace existing Comprehensive Plan designations and policies. In 2005, City Council adopted six Economic Development Strategy Areas under Resolution No. 3944. These areas, initially identified by a focus group of diverse business and community interests, are targeted for population and employment growth within the planning horizon of the City's 20 year growth target (2031). Two additional economic development strategy areas were identified in 2010. In 2012, the City Council added another economic development strategy area, revised the planning horizon to 50 years, and modified the boundaries of the economic development strategy areas to correlate the areas with areas with priority business sectors. The boundaries of the economic development strategy areas are incorporated as sub-area plans of the Comprehensive Plan. Sub-Areas (See Map#.#) Identified Areas Auburn Golf Course GSA/Boeing Green River College Mary Olsen Farm Les Gave Campus Emerald Downs Auburn High School • OR Br .. ��.<«. _... u. _,��� rags-T54 of 751 27 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Designated Areas Auburn Environmental Park Auburn Municipal Airport 15"'St. SW/C St. SW/West Valley Hwy. N BNSF Rail Yard A St. SE Stuck River Road M St. SE SE 3121h/124h1 Ave Pike Street Auburn Way South Corridor Auburn Way North Corridor 8th Street NE AWS/Auburn Black Diamond NW Auburn Manufacturing Lakeview Rd. Village Mt. Rainier Adopted Areas Downtown (Ordinance 5549) Auburn Adventist Academy Auburn North Business Area (Resolution 2254) (Resolution 2283) Lakeland Hills (Resolution Lakeland Hills South (County Northeast Auburn (Ordinance 1851) H.E. Case Z15/UP70) 6183) 3. Impression Corridors: Impression corridors are aligned with a particular street, trail, river, stream. or specific linear corridor. Some corridors may be part of a Sub-Area, in which case. the Impression Corridor policies are additive to the Sub-Area Plan. Impression corridors enhance the areas in which residents, businesses. visitors move throughout the City. The benefit of an impression corridor is twofold: residents know that the City is invested in the aesthetic of main thoroughfares and businesses can build off of the design and aesthetic provided by the impression corridor. Improvements or modification to impression corridors include consist and aesthetic signage, landscaping, and monument features, and the rehabilitation or removal of existing buildings and property. Impression Corridor boundaries and policies are formally designated by adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Impression Corridors (See Map#.#) Auburn Way North Auburn Way South A Street SE/Auburn Avenue C Street SW 1511' Street SW 15th Street NW/NE 8th Street NE Main Street Division Street 1321' Street SE SE 320t1 Street SE 312th Street SE 304, Street M Street/Harvey Road R Street 0R , r,..T... ._ _.. .._ __. ,..� __..u.,.v 5 of 751 128 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Lake Tapps Corridor West Valley Highway Auburn Black Diamond Road Green River Road 37th Street NW S 27711 Street Interurban Trail Green River White River Mill Creek 4. Gateways: Gateways are specific places, intersections, or blocks within the City. These essential locations are established because they constitute the first impression into of Auburn. They are therefore highly important to plan, construct, maintain, and enhance their appearance and function. Gateway locations and policies are formally designated by adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. Gateways (See Map#.#) Auburn Way North and East Main Street and M All roads with an entry into Auburn Avenue Street NE/SE the city Auburn Way South between West Main Street between C Hwy 167 Off Ramps 4111 Street SE and 611 Street SE Street NW and B Street NW SR 18 Off Ramps • Implementing Designations Planned Unit Development Master Plans Policies District Policies. Policy LU- 111. Through regulation, capital investment, and community planning, identify, promote and market district identity. Sub Area Policies. Policy LU- 112. Each sub area will contain its own vision, goals, policies and strategies. Sub Area Plan Policies. Policy LU- 113. Sub area plans are components of the Comprehensive Plan. Adoption or revision of a sub area plan will be treated as a comprehensive plan amendment and will comply with the Growth Management Act, Countywide Planning Policies, Vision 2040 and the Core Comprehensive Plan. Impression Corridor Policies. Policy LU- 114. Create specific plans for each of the identified corridors that outlines development policies and regulations, necessary capital improvements, and • . .,.. ,:.,_ -_ e� _ w 6 of 751 I 29 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 implementation strategies. In the absence of any specific corridor plans,this section contains general policies that are to be applied within designated impression corridors. Policy LU- 115. Coordinate corridor planning, design, construction, and maintenance with other agencies, such as BNSF, the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation (MIT), and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Where one agency may more effectively manage the corridor, management or ownership consolidation is appropriate. Policy LU- 116. Promote the elimination or renovation of existing derelict or unmaintained structures, signs, fences, and properties along impression corridors through regulatory or enforcement mechanisms Policy LU- 117. Work with private and public property owners to educate, incentivize, and enforce regulations that are intended to improve the overall appearance of identified corridors. Policy LU- 118. Emphasize the design, orientation. construction materials, landscaping, and site layout for development proposals of new and existing buildings along impression corridors. New construction and the renovation of existing buildings create important opportunities for enhancing the appearance of impression corridors. Policy LU- 119. Establish regulations that ensure coordinated, attractive commercial signage is of an appropriate size and quantity. Signage regulations along these corridors may be different than those in other areas. Policy LU- 120. Take advantage of opportunities to provide informational signs, wayfinding signs, and traffic control signs that are attractive, useful, and integrated into a larger city-wide signage plan or policy. Policy LU- 121. Outdoor storage of materials, inventory, and other goods and off-street surface parking should be located at the rear of the property. If outdoor storage cannot be located in the rear of the property, then it should be screened from view from adjacent rights-of-way. Policy LU- 122. Design, construct. and enhance impression corridors to accommodate multi- modal uses. Policy LU- 123. Design and construct vehicular access points in a manner that consolidates access points serving multiple uses. Policy LU- 124. Signage, landscaping. and monument features should be used to establish prominent access points. Policy LU- 125. Discourage aerial utilities. Policy LU- 126. Invest in impression corridors by acquiring right of way, constructing and widening sidewalks, installing landscaping, building center medians, constructing parklets, providing street furniture, and other construction improvements. Gateway Policies. Gateways are specific places, intersections, or blocks within the City. These essential locations are established because they constitute the first impression into of Auburn. Gateways are intended to create a "welcome" into distinct areas of the City or into the City itself. They are therefore highly important to plan, construct, maintain. and enhance their appearance ORraNgSr157of751 I 30 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 and function. Gateway locations and policies are formally designated by adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. • Policy LU- 127. Prioritize by rank all gateways and develop potential opportunities and designs for each location. Policy LU- 128. Develop land use regulations that incorporate gateway priorities and concepts into private development proposals that are located at identified gateways. Policy LU- 129. Coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT)to understand options and implement actions at gateway location. Many of the gateway locations are within the WSDOT right of way. Policy LU- 130. Develop design layouts for gateway locations. Designs will identify key areas that greet residents and visitors as they enter the City or downtown center, opportunities for signage and monument features, and landscaping. Policy LU- 131. Maintain the established gateways. • • ORD.! Pdyc 158 of 751 131 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 APPENDIX A Auburn Adventist Academy-Adopted under Resolution 2254 on November 14, 1991 The Auburn Adventist Academy is primarily a secondary school operated by the Washington Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists. Since the school is sited on a larger complex that formerly housed a mill, the Academy has also sought to include industrial uses that support the mission of the school. The industrial uses provide employment opportunities, learning experiences, and vocational education for students of the Academy. The re-use of existing buildings and redevelopment of buildings lost to a fire in 1989 are the focal points of the industrial development. In addition to institutional and industrial uses, the Academy is also interested in agricultural uses for commercial and vocational purposes and currently operates a landing strip for aviation training. The plan focuses on providing predictability to planning, zoning,subdivision, and development decisions made by the City. Academy SPA Policies 1. All secondary uses must relate directly to the Academy's Mission Statement. 2. Both academic and industrial uses are to be located on specific, strategic locations on the site to properly address existing land use and to be consistent and compatible with adjoining uses. 3. Steep slopes along northern boundary of the Academy will be retained as a natural environment 4. All development must be driven by the Academy and its appearance shall be consistent with an overall open, campus-like environment. Auburn North Business Area-Adopted under Resolution 2283 on March 2, 1992 The Auburn North Business Area Special Planning Area Plan was the result of a comprehensive planning study due to increased development pressure north of the Central Business District. Since the Central Business District, which contains Downtown, the core of Auburn, is adjacent to these areas, future development in this area is crucial. A comprehensive and cohesive direction was also needed based on increased development proposals and rezone requests. In addition to development concerns, many of the considerable undeveloped parcels contain wetlands. All of these factors made development controls beyond zoning and development regulations advisable. Auburn North Business Area SPA Policies 1. A mix of land uses, including light commercial and multifamily residential, are the principal uses. These uses are targeted to complement the CBD 2. Pedestrian-oriented development is advised 3. Automobile drive-in facilities, service stations, and automobile sales are not permitted ORCTC P ��" I 9 of 751 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 4. Buildings are designed to be pedestrian-friendly based on building siting, frontages, walkways, parking, and amenities • Lakeland Hills-Adopted under Resolution 1851 on April 18, 1988 P p Lakeland Hills area lies between the Stuck River and the southern City limits of Auburn in the most southwestern part of the City. The area consists of planned residential and commercial subdivisions, and is predominately residential in nature, offering a range of housing types, including single family and multi-family dwellings. The Lakeland Hills Plan was intended to provide long-term predictability to both the City and potential developers. As a planned community, development and design must be consistent with the policy guidance of the Lakeland Hills Plan. Lakeland Hills SPA Policies 1. Higher residential densities and limited areas of commercial are oriented to the lower elevations of the area and along Oravetz Road 2. Higher elevations are reserved for single family residential neighborhoods 3. All commercial development must be integrated and compatible with the design of adjacent park and residential uses 4. Future developments must be designed as to minimize the potential severe erosion hazards Lakeland Hills South-Approved under Pierce County Hearing Examiner Case Z15/UP70 Lakeland Hills South lies south of the Lakeland Hills special plan area and is the most southwestern part of the City. The area is predominately residential, allowing for a range of housing types, with commercial uses, including Lakeland Town Center, in the center. Nonresidential uses, including civic, religious, and municipal services are allowed throughout the area through an Administrative Use Permit. Unlike Lakeland Hills, Lakeland Hills South was accepted into Auburn was a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The Lakeland Hills PUD, originally the Lakeland Hills South Planned Development District (PDD), was approved under Pierce County Hearing Examiner Case no Z15-UP70 in 1990. Lakeland Hills South PUD is intended to provide enhanced flexibility to develop a site through innovative and alternative development standards. As a PUD,specific development and design standards are prescribed. Lakeland Hills South SPA Policies 1. Natural amenities,such as open spaces and sensitive environmental features, should be strategically preserved and conducive to affordable housing. 2. Affordable housing should be provided consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Development should be pedestrian-oriented and encourage the use of travel modes that are alternative to automobiles, such as walking, bicycling, and mass transit. S ORD.! Pdyc 160 of 751 P , - = 133 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 4. All development, including building architecture, landscaping, and site planning, shall be subject to design review. 5. Enhance parks and open spaces should be enhanced in accordance with the Parks Master Plan and Comprehensive Transportation Plan's non-motorized plan. Auburn Downtown Plan -Adopted under Ordinance 5549 on May 21, 2001 Downtown Auburn is the business, governmental, and cultural hub of Auburn, its physical and cultural heart. Many stores, restaurants, service providers, and small offices are well- represented throughout this district. Downtown hosts many community events and activities, such as the weekly Auburn International Farmers Market in the summer, Soundbites! Concert Series (in the City Hall Plaza) and the Veterans Day Parade. Downtown features public art that includes temporary installations such as Pianos on Parade and a permanent outdoor Downtown Sculpture Gallery with rotating pieces. This dynamism is possible because the district is a collection of uses that coexist in close proximity to one another. Due to the value, importance, and complexity of this district, The Auburn Downtown Plan identified four general needs to be addressed by the plan: • Update of the existing plan in order to continue Downtown revitalization • Concern over the reopening of Stampede Pass • Multiple large projects proposed for Downtown • Scarce private investment In conjunction with project-based items, a regulatory element that emerged from the goals of the Auburn Downtown Plan was the Downtown Urban Center(DUC)zoning district, which was established in 2007. While the DUC zoning district is intended specifically to address the needs of downtown, though the implementation of policies identified by the Downtown Auburn P/an, many challenges related to public and private investment, development, and strategic planning have yet to be addressed as downtown has evolved. Downtown (DUC) Policies 1. Auburn Comprehensive Plan Chapter 5, Section 5.X contains policies applicable to the downtown. land use designation 2. Auburn Downtown Plan, Section 1.4 contains policies applicable to downtown. 3. Find creative and innovative methods to adaptively reuse existing buildings for a variety of uses 4. Reduce regulatory barriers and increase incentives to encourage strategic development (i.e. "makers", small-scale manufacturing, creative enterprises,and micro-scale restaurants). 5. Coordinate with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan to address parking and multimodal transit options. 6. Seek out branding opportunities through signage, art projects, and cohesive design to help re-enforce Downtown character. 7. Implement improvement projects including the Main Street Corridor Project (20%design) ORu.r= rayu 161 of 751 Page X34 DRAFT LAND USE ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 8. Implement the Downtown Facade Improvement Program, the Downtown Façade Improvement Program,and the Comprehensive Downtown Parking Management Plan • (CDPMP). • 110 OR[Th P'at2'f62 of 751 -- 1 35 Exhibit 4 • AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN — VOLUME 2 Housing Element HOUSING ELEMENT VISION Auburn is a place our diverse community is proud to call home for a lifetime. Auburn provides opportunities for attainable housing in a variety of styles to meet the needs of all ages, abilities, cultures, and incomes. Our neighborhoods are safe and attractive, offer gathering places to meet friends and family, are connected by trails, streets, and transit, and well-kept. Our households are aware of opportunities and services offered by governmental, educational, employment, health, and service providers that can enhance their quality of life. Volunteerism to improve our parks, schools, streets, and homes makes our neighborhoods and families stronger. Our quality housing and neighborhoods support our local economy. HOUSING CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY The City of Auburn commissioned a Housing Needs and Characteristics Report (BERK 2014) to identify community needs and develop Housing Element policies. Key findings of that report are summarized below and led to the development updated goals and policies. • Auburn is diverse. Approximately 25%of Auburn residents speak a language other than English. This is similar to King County (25%) and higher than Pierce County(14%). Spanish (9%), Asian and Pacific Island languages (8%), and other Indo-European languages (7%) are the most common languages spoken other than English in Auburn. See Exhibit 1. Exhibit 1 Languages Spoken at Home in Auburn, 2008-2012 5-Year Average %of Group Persons Without Age 5+ English Language Spoken at Home years %of Total Proficiency 8% Speak only English 48,919 75% -- 7% Spanish or Spanish Creole 5,928 9% 48% 9% Other Indo-European languages 4,385 7% 44% Asian and Pacific Island languages 5,245 8% 42% 75% Other languages 943 1% 32% Total 65,400 100% 11% Source:2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Auburn's diverse communities may have different housing preferences, and preferences for • neighborhood amenities, and services. For example, outreach conducted with the Hispanic community in association with the Housing Element Update showed that most would recommend Auburn as a place "Helping Communities And Organizations Create Their Best Futures" STRATEGY"ANALYSIS" Cui MUNIIAi IONS " iii DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 to live for family and friends and wanted their children to grow up and stay in Auburn, but desired • improved security and traffic calming. The outreach participants desired to help improve their neighborhood and volunteer. Auburn's household size trends show the City will need to ensure a variety of housing types are offered to match the needs of both small and large households. Auburn has a larger household size and average family size than King or Pierce Counties. However, household size composition information shows a significant proportion of single persons and two persons with no kids. Auburn also has a higher proportion of single parent households.The type of homes needed for smaller households may be different than for larger households. See Exhibit 2. Exhibit 2 Household Composition and Average Household Size Household Composition: Average Household Size:Auburn, Auburn, King County,and Pierce County King County, and Pierce County 100% 90% 16% 13% 16% MIOther Households 80% Average Average 70% 6' 7,Living Alone Household Family Size +•'� 60% Size 50% Single Parent, Auburn 2.67 3.22 4111 40% Children 2986 King County 2.40 3.05 30% 25% ®Married, No 20% Children Pierce County 2.59 3.09 10% 21% 22% 20% ■Married,Children 0% King Pierce Auburn Source:2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates;US Census,2010. Auburn is affordable. Auburn has a higher proportion of its population with lower incomes, and Auburn's housing is more affordable than the region. Rents are below King County Fair Market Rents, and the median sales price is at least$100,000 below the King County median sales price. Almost half of the City's households could afford the median priced home, and more than two thirds could afford the median priced condominium unit in Auburn. Auburn's housing stock is older and much of the rental housing is in fair or poor condition. Though housing is affordable in Auburn, the City could lose some of its most affordable rental housing as structures near the end of their useful life. See Exhibit 3 illustrating the Year Built information for the City showing older housing stock in the valley and West Hill and newer housing in Lea Hill and Lakeland Hills. • ORV.1• Pdyt iu4 of 751 P e I2 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 0 Exhibit 3 Year Built 0 7 SI 1 . .J a 'tin+- i � _ •_s- w I r}k r �i ,...-4.1F , o alikE 111 . :� • s i 1.f ` • e, Alre�n�,� km f IlliMs.,. .. 21.7rilteetar..kr . 41—ititsgi a..1ii St no IC .,•1,7er ;' ► 111 lir Jr- dig , r A�BURN 4 ice: �. T,— t ,� j 44 -s.ze .,,, . ."i ,.. C� �447-.7 I.s < e��e` , I : i — ' • 1� k0�"�a • _ Nier 111) _......,:-_-4,: o 1 _,A71..71._._-.:_.,_:,1 : w __ r_.. lflrwl �._:._.._..___. IIS;!! :-..is,: . I 1... '; � Irl �LJ !'',.. P;:r _..ip i7. 4 .re.11-131i r Salai OW.. rim" `""'i ' �: ..OI 1M . 1�1► r a - ` t ..L Residential Properties: , �� ' Date Built � -w . <1950 caAL `r I,ill I 15_1 It . ■ 1951 -1960 KING COUNTY ;� V.,:.,,y � � H• 1 r•�. ' ■ 1961-1970 PIERCE COUNTY (7 / r ! wU • . % a 1 4 1971-1980 °i ® 1981-1990 N I \ l i.�`', ` t: .1-, 4 �i& : R tt. 4.... ". ■ 1991-2000 ~..� , Q per, --.• L.. 1::..._.. El 2001-2010 n13 •i, ■ 2011 -Present ti - s 0 0.5 1 Writ ' -- I Miles III 1; A'f ..••.• Source-Kane County,2014;Pierce Couni.. 20v II/ Source:King County Assessor,2014;Pierce County Assessor 2014;BERK Consulting 2014 ORC.J.c 5 of 751 Page 1 3 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 • Overall,the assessed improvement value per square foot in Auburn is relatively low;see Exhibit 4.This is likely owing to the age of much of Auburn's housing as well as its position in the overall metropolitan market. Housing with the lowest improvement values per square foot are concentrated in the periphery areas outside of the city center. Exceptions include northeast Auburn around 132'd SE and the Lakeland Hills area. Exhibit 4 Assessed Improvement Value per Square Foot 1,600 — - 1,400 1,200 - - I I 1,000 I I — 800 A E 600 . 400 11111 - - 200 I I I I hir_—�———� — r}l I(!} V5V5V5.V1. a- 7,1 N NMNP+ 0N QN1 OmN M M1 V 4., VV [n. V'1•[/} 4/1.t/1• SJ), tn. i/i.V'1, i"i" th iJ>•4/1•i/} • Improvement Value per Square Foot A closer look at the improvement value per square foot demonstrates the distribution of housing units in Auburn. • There are approximately 1,600 units with no or very limited improvement value listed. • There is a long tail stretching towards higher improvement values per square foot,demonstrating the presences of some higher value housing stock. • The median improvement value (not including lots with no improvement value) is$16.73. Why is housing important to Auburn's future? The housing element can serve as a useful management tool to meet changing community needs for housing, as well as to address land use, economic development, transportation, environmental and other concerns. • A variety of housing choices can meet the needs of Auburn's residents at all ages and affordability levels, help residents maintain and retain their homes,and promote services and amenities that improve neighborhood livability. • Well planned housing can support Auburn's economic goals by attracting residents to live near their jobs, and by serving as a source of customers to support commercial districts. • Housing in proximity to transit or mixed-use projects can help reduce the need for costly infrastructure (e.g. roads and sewer). Housing in proximity to a variety of transportation modes can • increase a household's disposable income and savings by reducing the cost of transportation. • Well designed and located housing can reduce energy and water consumption,and promote healthy lifestyles. ORD.! li'dyc 166 of 751 14 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 HOUSING GOALS AND POLICIES • Healthy Homes & Neip'hhnrhnndc Policy H-1. Recognize the important role of public improvements, facilities and programs in providing a healthy home environment within the community. [HO-4] Policy H-2. Through integrated planning for land use, parks and recreation, transportation, housing, and jobs, support active living and healthy eating opportunities. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] Policy H-3. Promote safe and connected neighborhoods. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] A. Continue to implement crime prevention programs such as neighborhood block watches. B. Through the land use and building permit process, implement principles of crime prevention through environmental design. C. Promote community volunteerism to increase residents'wellbeing and safety. Policy H-4. Promote housing that meets the needs of Auburn's workforce, is located and designed to support affordable multimodal transportation options, and contributes to a regional jobs- housing balance. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-5. Provide for housing choices in Downtown and other designated mixed use centers where infrastructure is more available or can be improved with regional and local funds. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-6. Improve streetscapes in developed neighborhoods. Continue to repair and/or replace • deteriorated sidewalks and remove barriers to pedestrian traffic. [HO-30] Policy H-7. Seek and provide assistance for the reduction of lead-based paint hazards and measures to remove mold, improve energy conservation and provide for healthy indoor air quality. [Lead-based, HO-29; also housing audit] Policy H-8. Promote the City's neighborhood program. Connect residents to volunteer activities. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-9. When evaluating proposed developments, apply site and building design standards, require quality streetscape, landscape, onsite recreation and open space, and low impact development measures to improve community character and environmental quality. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] How can Auburn Plan for Active Living and Healthy Eating? Provide for a complete community with a variety of work, shopping, recreation, health and education, and ;orae environments. ,mplement a connected non-motorized trail and park system with neighborhood gathering spaces. Work with transit providers to connect neighborhoods to commercial and social services. Facilitate access to regional transportation and job centers in and near Auburn. Support art projects and cultural events to provide opportunities to build a sense of community investment, improve esthetics, bring people together cross-culturally, and involve neighborhood youth. Support community gardens to improve access to healthy food and to build community relationships. • ORB.! lAdye 167 of 751 l5 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Varlet); Policy H-10. Provide a land use plan and zoning that offers opportunities to achieve a variety of housing styles and densities for private and non-profit housing providers. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] Policy H-11. Promote opportunities for home ownership through single-family detached and semi- attached housing, fee-simple cottages and townhouses, and condominium apartments. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-12. Allow accessory dwelling units as an affordable housing strategy. [HO-19] Policy H-13. Encourage residential development in Downtown, particularly housing that is integrated with commercial development. [HO-18] Policy H-14. Implement incentives to develop underutilized parcels into new uses that allow them to function as pedestrian- oriented, mixed-use neighborhoods. Existing uses which are complementary, economical, and physically viable shall integrate into the form and function of the neighborhood. [HO-26] Policy H-15. Use innovative zoning provisions to encourage infill development of underutilized parcels in zones which have been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as areas where infill residential development should be encouraged. Certain development requirements for infill development may be relaxed, while requiring adherence to specific design requirements to ensure compatibility with the character of nearby existing residential structures. [HO-27] Policy H-16. Allow appropriately designed manufactured housing within single family neighborhoods, consistent with state law. [HO-13] Policy H-17. Allow manufactured housing parks and multifamily housing in appropriately zoned but limited areas. [HO-14] 01.1n lit' Policy H-18. Conserve Auburn's existing housing stock because it is the most affordable form of housing. [Objective 7.7] Policy H-19. Inventory and map dilapidated properties. [public works, 2012] Policy H-20. Organize, educate and assist property managers and owners in the creation and preservation of safe neighborhoods. [HO-28] A. Offer an owner-landlord training program to better market, manage and maintain residential rental property. [public works, 2012] B. Encourage retention of professional management assistance. [public works, 2012] C. Recognize and publicize well maintained apartment properties, such as by awarding a "multifamily property of the year." [public works, 2012] D. Advise landlords with problem buildings about the benefits of donating their property or selling it below market cost to a specially designated non-profit organization. [public works, 2012] Policy H-21. Promote housing improvements by property owners and building managers. Seek available assistance for housing rehabilitation. Assistance will include the development of residential infrastructure and the rehabilitation of individual properties. [HO-2o] A. Find public and private sources of capital and offer low-interest loans for rehabilitation. [public works, 2012] ORD E riggrnr68 of 751 6 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 B. Continue to participate in the Emergency Home Repair Program and consider partnering with non-governmental organizations to maximize funds. [public works, • 2012] C. Encourage green lending for improved energy conservation, indoor air quality, and other measures. [public works, 2012] D. Help identify professional volunteers at educational or professional associations to plan redesign or architectural upgrades of the properties. [public works, 2012] Policy H-22. Evaluate and update codes applicable to housing and provide effective and appropriate enforcement. [HO-9] A. Enforce city ordinances regarding abandoned properties. [public works, 2012]1 B. Consider a multifamily inspection program. [public works, 2012] C. Consider public identification of landlords who are found to be out of compliance for extended time periods and unwilling to take steps to ameliorate substandard conditions. [public works, 2012] D. Consider a landlord compliance program where code enforcement penalties can be reduced if attending landlord training programs. [public works, 2012] Policy H-23. Work with park owners, managers and park tenants to develop policies and regulations to preserve manufactured home parks and the affordable housing they offer. [HO-21] Policy H-24. Consider an Auburn Housing Authority. [Council Vision] • Policy H-25. Promote affordable housing that meets changing demographic needs. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] Policy H-26. Work in partnership with King County and other cities to address the countywide need for housing affordable to households with moderate, low and very-low incomes, including those with special needs. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] A. The King County countywide need for housing by percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) is: • 50-80%of AMI (moderate) - 16%of total housing supply • 30-50%of AMI (low) - 12%of total housing supply • 30%and below AMI (very-low) - 12%of total housing supply B. Address the King County need for housing affordable to households at less than 30% AMI (very low income),through all jurisdictions working individually and collectively. C. Meet Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies to provide opportunities for housing affordable to all incomes including low incomes. D. Focus Auburn's efforts towards the countywide and community need for low and moderate income housing on preserving existing affordable housing with robust maintenance and repair programs, and ensuring long-term affordability of existing housing. public works,2012,Preserving Rental Housing in Auburn ORD"E' P7g2169 of 751 I7 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 Policy H-27. Encourage and assist in the renovation of surplus public and commercial buildings and land into affordable housing. Additionally, explore opportunities to dedicate revenues from sales of publicly owned properties, including tax title sales, to affordable housing projects. [extension of HO-22; element audit] Policy H-28. Seek, encourage and assist nonprofit organizations in acquiring depreciated apartment units for the purpose of maintaining and ensuring their long-term affordability. [HO-23] Policy H-29. Review and streamline development standards and regulations to advance their public benefit, provide flexibility, and minimize additional costs to housing. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-30, Promote compliance with federal and state fair housing laws. Support fair housing opportunities for all regardless race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, or disability.,�l1 [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] Policy H-31, Encourage and support human and health service organizations that offer programs and facilities for people with special needs. Support programs in particular that help people to remain within the community, including those that are disabled, seniors, single parent households, and the homeless. [broadened HO-1] Policy H-32. Assist low-income persons, who are displaced as a result of redevelopment, find affordable housing in accordance with state and federal laws and regulations. [HO-15] Policy H-33. Continue to ensure that funding becomes available to support youth and social services in Auburn. [HO-31] Policy H-34. Support seniors who wish to age in place in their homes, such as with home rehabilitation services, adult day health and senior center activities. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-35. Provide opportunities for assisted living and retirement communities. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-36. Promote universal design principles to ensure housing is designed to be usable by all people regardless of age or abilities. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] ,Q Services Policy H-37. Provide empowering training for local residents who want to participate in civic activities and who would like to improve their knowledge and skills around community leadership. [public works, 2012] Policy H-38. Provide information in multiple languages to Auburn's diverse communities regarding services offered by local and regional governmental, educational, employment, health, and other providers to improve residents' quality of life and to promote resident engagement and household economic independence. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-39. Offer financial and homebuyer education to encourage household saving and budgeting to consider home ownership. [public works, 2012] Policy H-40. Provide information and resources that educate and guide low-income persons toward affordable housing opportunities. Develop materials in multiple languages. [HO-16] Policy H-41. Review proposals to site facilities providing new or expanded human services within the City to determine their potential impacts and whether they meet the needs of the Auburn community. Important caveats in the City's consideration will include the following: [HO- 5] OR D"'t ""f 70 of 751 I8 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13, 2015 A. While Auburn will willingly accept its regional share of facilities which provide residential services, or influence residential location decisions, Auburn will expect other communities to accept their share as well. B. The funding of human service centers sited in Auburn that serve an area larger than Auburn would rely on an equitable regional source of funding. C. The siting of all facilities shall be based on sound land use planning principles and should establish working relationships with affected neighborhoods. Partnerships and Mor►ai.o +i ;j Policy H-42. Partner with South King County jurisdictions in ongoing efforts to coordinate the human, educational, and housing needs of our diverse cultural communities, such as through the Road Map Project, interjurisdictional housing and human services forums, and other efforts. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-43. Support national, state and especially regional efforts to address the housing and human service needs of the region and the City. [HO-7] Policy H-44. Explore all available federal, state and local programs and private options for financing affordable housing, removing or reducing risk factors, and preserving safe neighborhoods. [Objective 4.4] Policy H-45. Work in partnership with public and private housing providers, businesses, and other agencies in the provision of housing assistance to Auburn residents and business em ployees. Policy H-46. Through the building permit process, inventory and track affordable housing opportunities within Auburn. Distribute affordable housing information to nonprofit agencies serving • the homeless and low-income persons. [HO-17] Policy H-47. Monitor housing supply, affordability, and diversity in Auburn and its contribution to the countywide and regional housing need. [Element audit, needs assessment, outreach] Policy H-48. Review and amend, a minimum every five years, local housing policies and strategies. [Element audit, needs assessment,outreach] • ORD.! Pdye 171 of 751 I9 DRAFT HOUSING ELEMENT OCTOBER 13,2015 HOUSING OBJECTIVES AND IMPLEMENTATION The City has developed housing objectives implementation strategies addressing housing diversity, condition, attainability, and programs to serve special needs. See Exhibit 5. The City will monitor the objectives over time. Exhibit 5. Housing Objectives and Tools Outcome � Improve housing quality Increased quality of rental housing Housing rehabilitation and repair loans Loans for energy conservation and healthy indoor air quality City-sponsored and non-profit property manager programs Housing inspection program Code enforcement Community volunteer program Meet demand for new Land capacity to meet or exceed Land use plan and zoning housing units housing target Promote housing ownership Maintain or increase home- Single family dwellings including small lots ownership rates Accessory dwelling units Cottages,townhomes Allow for a variety of housing Increased numbers of small units Single family dwellings including small lots types to meet size and age with neighborhood recreation and Accessory dwelling units and cultural trends service amenities Multiplexes,cottages,townhomes Retention of housing stock with Mixed use zoning larger units. Incentives infill housing types Increase opportunities for Increased numbers of ownership Accessory dwelling units housing to very low,low,and dwellings available to moderate Downtown incentives moderate income incomes households Infill incentives Increased mixed use development for all incomes Permit and impact fee waivers Increased preservation and See also"improve housing quality'above improvement of rental housing with long term affordability commitments Improved opportunities for Greater match of housing to Community services programs special needs housing and special needs including housing for Partnerships with non-profit housing providers services all ages,abilities, homeless and non-governmental organizations Monitor housing supply, Address achievement of indicators Monitor in conjunction with regular affordability,and diversity above Comprehensive Plan Updates and at time of new countywide planning policy housing targets ORD.! Paye 172 of 751 I 10 Exhibit 5 AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - VOLUME 3 Capital Facilities Element CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT VISION Capital Facilities in Auburn are planned, designed, and constructed in a manner that adequately supports future growth scenarios that are predicted in the City's Land Use Element and that meet the needs of residents, visitors and businesses. Sustainability is a principal that guides decisions for where facilities are placed, how they are constructed, how they are operated and maintained, and how all aspects of design, construction and operation are funded. CAPITAL FACILITIES CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY Growth: The provision and sizing of public facilities such as streets or water and sewer lines can influence the rate or timing of development and is an important means of managing growth. Timed provision of facilities also ensures that new development can be assimilated into the existing community without serious disruptions or adverse impacts. This Plan establishes policies to allow development when and where all public facilities are adequate or can be made adequate, and only when and where such development can be adequately served by public facilities and services consistent with adopted level of service standards. One of the key provisions of the Growth Management Act is concurrency. In general. concurrency seeks to ensure that development is permitted only if adequate public facilities are. or can be guaranteed to be, available to support new development. Concurrency serves to place the finance function of local government in a much more prominent role in the land use development process. While the concept of concurrency is new to many jurisdictions. it has been used in Auburn since the adoption of its 1986 Comprehensive Plan. • The Act requires concurrency for transportation facilities, though. if a jurisdiction desires, it can apply to other public facilities as well. Concurrency requires that facilities needed to maintain a locally adopted level of service be provided "concurrent" with development. With respect to transportation facilities. concurrent is defined within the Act as being provided at the time of or within six years of development (this is done to coincide with the six year time frame of most capital facilities plans). If the facility is not available at the time of development, funding must be available to construct the facility within the six year capital facilities plan. Regardless of whether or not a local jurisdiction applies concurrency to public facilities other than transportation, there is still a need to coordinate new development with the provision of capital facilities. This ensures that all relevant public facilities and services are planned and available to serve the demands of new growth. INTRODUCTION This chapter provides an overall policy direction for the different capital facility plans and programs provided by the City. Capital facilities belonging to privately owned utilities (electricity. natural gas lines. etc.) are covered in the Private Utilities chapter (Volume 4). Certain City plans and programs are further refined in other sections of this plan such as parks or transportation. Overall, however, this chapter acts as a reference to all of the various capital facility plans, including the City of Auburn Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (which is a key component of, and is adopted with, this plan), comprehensive plans, capital improvement and investment programs. inventories, and studies that together represent the planning and financing mechanisms required to serve the capital facility needs of Auburn. For more detail on a particular Capital Facility or the City's overall Capital Facility Plan, see the most recent adopted version of the following: ORD.E Page 173 of 751 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 • City of Auburn Airport Master Plan • City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan • City of Auburn Comprehensive Sewer Plan • City of Auburn Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan • City of Auburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan • City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan • Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan • Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan • Diehnger School District Capital Facilities Plan • Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan VALUES: Character — Public buildings and spaces incorporate high quality building and landsape design so that they positively impact the surrounding built environment. Wellness — Public spaces that are purchased and developed for capital facilities also incorporate features and infrastructure that provide more complete non-motorized connections. Service — City utilities and buildings are high in quality and complete, reliable, and available to residents and business owners. Economy — City utilities are available or planned to be available to serve allowed commercial, recreational and residential uses. Celebration — Capital facility spaces will be available, designed, and programmed in a manner that promotes public gathering. Environment — Development of capital facilities will place a premium on environmental preservation and protection. Sustainable — Our philosophy to designing, constructing and maintaining utilities and buildings embraces long term investment horizon over concepts that provide short term benefits and outcomes. PLANNING APPROACH To manage growth in a manner which enhances, rather than detracts from community quality and values by actively coordinating land use type and intensity with City facility and service development and provision. Objective 1.1. To ensure that new development does not out-pace the City's ability to provide and maintain adequate public facilities and services, by allowing new development to occur only when and where adequate facilities exist or will be provided, and by encouraging development types and locations which can support the public services they require. Policies: CF-1 Lands designated for urban growth by this Plan shall have an urban level of public facilities (sewer, water, storm drainage, and parks) prior to or concurrent with development. CF-2 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an efficient manner. CF-3 Development shall be allowed only when and where such development can be adequately served by public services (police and fire) without reducing level of service elsewhere. CF-4 If adequate facilities are currently unavailable and public funds are not committed to provide such facilities, developers must provide such facilities at their own expense in order to develop. OR'. ..- 4of751 12 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 CF-5 The City should continue to assist through direct participation. LIDs and payback agreements, to the extent permitted by law. where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available, • the City may participate in developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the extent that the improvements benefit the broader public interest, and are in accord with the specific policies and recommendations of the appropriate City public facilities plan. CF-6 New connections to the City's sanitary sewer, water and/or storm drainage systems. shall contribute their fair share toward the construction and/or financing of future or on-going projects to increase the capacity of those systems. CF-7 The City shall encourage and approve development only where adequate public services including police protection, fire and emergency medical services. education, parks and other recreational facilities, solid waste collection, and other governmental services are available or will be made available at acceptable levels of service prior to project occupancy or use. CF-8 Extension of any individual facility, irrespective of mode of financing, to serve new development should be approved only if it is determined that adequate fiscal capacity exists to support the extension of other needed facilities. CF-9 Extension of any individual facility, irrespective of mode of financing, to serve new development should be approved only if it is determined that adequate fiscal capacity exists to support cost effective service by all on-going public services and maintenance of facilities. Objective 1.2. To ensure that new developments are supported by an adequate level of public services through an effective system of public facilities. Policies: CF-10 Public facilities shall be provided in accord with the guidance of the Capital Facilities Plan or. as • may be appropriate a system plan for each type of facility designed to serve at an adequate level of service the locations and intensities of uses specified in this comprehensive plan. CF-11 No new development shall be permitted unless the facilities specified in each facility plan are available or can be provided at a level adequate to support the development. The adequacy of facilities shall be determined by the following: 1. An adopted system plan; 2. Policy guidance as provided in the City Capital Facilities Plan: 3. Appropriate engineering design standards as specified in applicable City Plans, Codes, and manuals as approved by the City Engineer; 4. Environmental review standards (adequacy includes the absence of an unacceptable adverse impact on a public facility system). 5. Case by case evaluation of the impacts of a proposed development on the public facility systems: first to determine the minimum amount of facilities necessary to support the development and second to determine a proportionate share of the system to be developed or financially guaranteed before approving the development. CF-12 No new development shall be approved which is not supported by a minimum of facilities to support the development and which does not provide for a proportionate share of related system needs. CITY UTILITIES • ORD.E rays 175 of 751 Page 13 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 City Utilities The City of Auburn manages sewer. water and storm drainage utilities as well as solid waste collection. The sewer and water utilities serve the City and several areas outside the City limits. As stated above. the efficient provision of these services can play a significant role in managing the growth of the City as well as on the quality of life for residents of Auburn and the surrounding areas. To protect the public health and safety by providing efficient and cost-effective water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage and solid waste services to the community. Ensure that development will only occur if the urban services necessary to support the development will be available at the time of development. Water Service The City provides water service to a total of 13,910 customer accounts as of the end of 2013. The City's sources of water include the Coal Creek Springs watershed, West Hill Springs watershed and is supplemented by a system of ten wells and two connections to the regional water system operated by Tacoma Public Utilities. Storage facilities are found on the Enumclaw plateau, Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill. For more background information see the Capital Facilities Plan or Comprehensive Water Plan. Objective 1.3 To ensure safe and adequate water service, for both domestic and fire protection purposes, to meet the needs of the existing community and provide for its planned growth. Policies: CF-13 The City of Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan is incorporated as an element of this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Water Plan for the City of Auburn shall reflect the planned land uses and densities of this Comprehensive Plan. CF-14 The Comprehensive Water Plan shall provide for the evaluation of existing and potential future groundwater sources regarding any threats to the quantity and quality of such sources. The Plan shall ensure that strategies for the protection of ground water sources used or likely to be used for public water supplies are established. CF-15 Protection of the City's Coal Creek Springs, and West Hill watersheds, wells, and other sources shall be a high priority in the designation of appropriate land uses in the vicinity of these areas and facilities. CF-16 The City shall continue its policy of requiring that water system extensions needed to serve new development shall be built prior to or simultaneously with such development, according to the size and configuration identified by the Comprehensive Water Plan as necessary to serve future planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full consideration to the ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City shall continue to participate to the extent permitted by law, through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements to assist in the financing of such over sized improvements. Wherever any form of City finance is involved in a water line extension, lines that promote a compact development pattern will be favored over lines traversing large undeveloped areas where future development plans are uncertain. CF-17 Whenever a street is to be substantially reconstructed or a new street built, the City Engineer shall determine whether water facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed or brought up to the size and configuration indicated by the Water Plan and Comprehensive Plan. CF-18 The City shall continue to recognize the overall system impacts of new development upon the City water system through the collection and appropriate use of system development charges or similar fees. CF-19 The City shall consider the impacts of new development within aquifer recharge areas of potable water sources as part of its environmental review process and require any appropriate mitigation OR .f raye r /6 of 751 14 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 measures. Such mitigation may involve hydrogeologic studies. testing, and/or monitoring (including monitoring wells), spill response planning, spill containment devices, sanitary sewers, and use of best management practices. CF-20 The City shall promote water conservation and the wise use of water resources. CF-21 The City should work with other water providers to promote effective water supply management and planning consistent with the "South King County Coordinated Water System Plan". as well as regional water supply and conservation goals. Sanitary Sewers The City provides sewer service to a total of 15,398 customer accounts as of June 2015. The system is primarily a collection system with treatment provided by Metro. The system includes approximately 200 miles of sewers and force mains and 15 sewer pump stations. There are significant areas within the City's service area which are currently on septic systems, although plans for future expansion of sewer service into these areas is included in the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. For more details, see the Capital Facilities Plan or the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Objective 1.4 To ensure the efficient transmission of sanitary sewage to the appropriate treatment and disposal facilities, in order to meet the needs of the existing community and provide for its planned growth. Policies: CF-22 The Comprehensive Sewer Plan is incorporated as an element of this Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Sewer Plan for the City of Auburn shall reflect the planned land uses and densities of this Comprehensive Plan. CF-23 The City shall continue its policy of requiring that sewer system extensions needed to serve new development shall be built prior to or simultaneously with such development, according to the size • and configuration identified by the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Comprehensive Plan as necessary to serve future planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full consideration to the ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City shall continue to use, to the extent permitted by law, direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements to assist in the financing of such oversized improvements. Wherever any form of City finance is involved in a sewer line extension, lines that promote a compact development pattern will be favored over lines traversing large undeveloped areas where future development plans are uncertain. CF-24 Whenever a street is to be substantially reconstructed or a new street built, the City Engineer shall determine whether sewer facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed or brought up to the size and configuration indicated by the Comprehensive Sewer Plan and Comprehensive Plan. CF-25 The City shall continue to recognize the overall system impacts of new development upon the City sewer system. through the collection and appropriate use of system development charges or similar fees. CF-26 The City shall continue to require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered, and shall continue to aggressively seek to minimize any storm water infiltration of the sanitary sewer system. CF-27 Within those designated urban density areas of the City and within the sanitary sewer utility's designated service area, sewerage service should be provided by public sewers. The City should develop mechanisms to accommodate conversion to public sewers of all septic systems within the City's service area, particularly when on site systems fail or when public health and water quality is • threatened. ORD.F ._. . _ 7 of 751 15 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Solid Waste The City of Auburn has a contract with Waste Management to handle solid waste collection throughout most of the City of Auburn and Republic in the area of Lea Hill. Both contracts expire on December 31, 2017. There are approximately 16,000 Waste Management accounts and 3.800 Republic accounts. Recycling is handled by Waste Management. Residential customers are currently recycling curbside approximately 47%of its waste stream. Objective 1.5. To provide area residents and businesses with a universal and compulsory system for collection and disposal of all solid waste, including ample waste reduction and recycling opportunities intended to maximize diversion of the City's waste stream away from costly landfills, incineration, or other solid waste disposal facilities, and to conserve exhaustible resources. Policies: CF-28 The King County Solid Waste Management Plan and Solid Waste Interlocal Forum, except as modified by City of Auburn Ordinance 4413 and this Plan shall form the basis for solid waste management activities within the City. CF-29 The City shall continue to fund solid waste collection, disposal and waste reduction and recycling programs and services through the existing solid waste utility, with supplemental funding provided through available grants. CF-30 The City shall implement solid waste management programs and services which provide ample opportunities and incentives to maximize the community's participation in local and regional waste reduction and recycling efforts. CF-31 The City's solid waste management programs shall be developed to make waste reduction and recycling efficient. reliable, cost-effective, and convenient for all residents and businesses. CF-32 The City encourages and should promote the use of products manufactured from recycled materials, and the use of materials which can be recycled. City Departments and contractors shall use recycled and recyclable products whenever and wherever feasible. CF-33 The City shall implement solid waste reduction and recycling programs which have the cumulative effect maintaining the 50 percent waste reduction and recycling goal (recycling tons/total solid waste stream). CF-34 The City shall periodically monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of Auburn's waste reduction and recycling programs to ensure that local and state goals and policies are being met. CF-35 The City shall promote the recycling of solid waste materials by providing opportunities for convenient recycling and by developing educational materials on recycling, composting and other waste reduction methods. Storm Drainage As of October 2015, the City Storm Drainage System serves over 17,600 customers, exclusively within the City limits. The System consists of a combination of open ditches, closed conveyance pipes, water quality facilities, and pump stations. For more details, see the Capital Facilities Plan or the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. Objective 1.6. To ensure that collection, conveyance, storage and discharge of storm drainage is provided in a sufficient and environmentally responsible manner, in order to meet the needs of the existing community and provide for its planned growth. Policies: ORD.0 fudge 178 of 751 6 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 CF-36 The City of Auburn Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan is incorporated as an element of this Comprehensive Plan. 110 CF-37 The City shall require developers to construct storm drainage improvements directly serving the development, including any necessary off-site improvements. CF-38 The City shall require that off-site storm drainage improvements needed to serve new development shall be built prior to or simultaneously with such development, according to the size and configuration identified by the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan as necessary to serve future planned development. The location and design of these facilities shall give full consideration to the ease of operation and maintenance of these facilities by the City. The City should continue to use direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements to assist in the financing of off-site improvements required to serve the development. CF-39 The City shall recognize the overall system impacts of new development upon the City's drainage system, through the collection of system development charges or similar fees to assist in the financing of new and oversized (e.g. regional drainage improvements.) CF-40 The City should continue to fund and provide storm drainage services through the existing storm drainage utility. The City's storm drainage utility should be responsible for implementation, maintenance and operation of the City's storm drainage system and to seek out sources of storm water pollution and correct them. CF-41 Appropriate rates and system development charges shall be assessed to fund the on-going maintenance, operation, and capital expenditures of the utility, in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. Periodic cost of service studies shall be completed to reassess the monthly service and system development charges. CF-42 Drainage facilities serving the larger community should be owned, operated and maintained by the City's storm drainage utility. Drainage facilities serving individual properties are discouraged, however if essential, as determined by the City Engineer, they should be owned, operated and maintained by the property owner in accordance with a recorded maintenance agreement approved by the City. The maintenance agreement shall include provisions that will preserve the City's ability to ensure the long term use of the drainage facility, and may include the granting of an easement over the facility to the City. Maintenance intensive drainage facilities designed to serve as a multifunctional private resource (e.g., private parks, wetland mitigation) should not be owned, operated or maintained by the utility. The utility shall ensure that all private and public storm drainage improvements are designed, constructed, operated and maintained in accordance with the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan and Comprehensive Plan. CF-43 The City shall encourage the use of regional-scale water quality and quantity control facilities as a means of controlling drainage and flood waters. CF-44 Wherever possible, regional detention facilities should be utilized as a multi-functional community resource. When selecting a site and designing a regional storm drainage facility, the City should consider other public benefits such as recreational, habitat, cultural, educational, open space and aesthetic opportunities. CF-45 The City shall promote policies which seek to maintain the existing conveyance capacity of natural drainage courses. CF-46 Whenever a street is to be substantially reconstructed or a new street built, the City Engineer shall determine whether drainage facilities in that street right of way shall be constructed to adequately service the street and whether they should be brought up to the size and configuration indicated by • the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan. If the inclusion of water quality and quantity control 17 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,201S facilities is not feasible, as determined by the City Engineer, when street reconstruction occurs, off- site mitigation may be considered regionally as proposed within the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan to meet the City's storm drainage requirements as determined by the City Engineer. CF-47 The City shall require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered. CF-48 In selecting the preferred Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan sub-basin alternative for implementation by the City's storm drainage utility, the City shall consider the following factors: 1. The most efficient and cost effective means of serving a subbasin or combination of subbasins. 2. The ability of the alternative to implement source control best management practices and to avoid or mitigate environmental impacts, such as impacts to existing wetlands, and the degree to which the alternative promotes water quality treatment, and protects aquatic and riparian habitat. 3. Consistency with Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan policies and recommendations and compatibility with stormwater improvement policies and recommendations presented in other regional stormwater plans. 4. Restrictions or constraints associated with receiving waters. 5. The ability to develop a multi-use facility. 6. The degree to which the alternative preserves, increases, and is compatible with existing open space. 7. Consistency with existing and future planned development. 8. The advantages and disadvantages of storage versus conveyance while ensuring adequate treatment for water quality treatment. 9. The degree to which the alternative preserves and enhances existing native vegetation and existing drainage courses. 10. The alternatives ability to reduce flood hazard impacts resulting from the 25-year design storm event. CF-49 The City's Storm Drainage Utility shall strive to meet the environmental protection goals of the Comprehensive Plan through compliance with and implementation of the policies contained herein. Environmental issues such as water quality and fish habitat protection shall be considered in all new development applications and new storm drainage improvements. CF-50 The Storm Drainage Utility shall work with other jurisdictions and agencies to address regional water quality issues. CF-51 The City shall seek opportunities where feasible to reintroduce treated urban runoff back into groundwater system as new and redevelopment occurs to minimize urbanization impacts to the hydrology of the natural river systems. CF-52 The City shall evaluate the feasibility and opportunity to improve the water quality of its existing discharges to the river systems to enhance water quality in response to the Endangered Species Act. CF-53 The City shall seek to minimize the impacts to the natural river system's hydrology by encouraging pre-treatment of surface flows of new development and re-introduction into the groundwater where feasible. OR rays 180 of 751 1s DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Communications and Data Infrastructure Objective 1.7 To enhance the City's communications and data infrastructure through installation of City- • owned conduit throughout the city. Policies: CF-54 To allow for expansion of the City's conduit system with minimal disruption to streets and at a lower cost to the public, the City shall require the placement of conduits as part of arterial street (as defined in the City of Auburn Transportation Plan) improvement projects whether private or public development projects. CF-55 The City shall explore new technologies that may present additional opportunities for the City to use its communications and data infrastructure to enhance its provisions of public services. CF-56 To increase system-wide coordinated management of facilities. the City shall work towards increasing the number of remote monitoring facilities for utility facilities. traffic control devices. and other equipment located throughout the city. CF-57 Whenever possible, make remote data access available to the City's police officers, inspectors. utility staff, and other field personnel. PUBLIC BUILDINGS To maximize public access and provide for the appropriate location and development of public and institutional facilities that serve the cultural, educational, recreational, religious and public service needs of the community and the region. Objective 1.8. To site public and institutional buildings in accord with their service function and the needs of the members of the public served by the facility. • Policies: CF-58 Downtown shall continue to be the business center of City government and the City shall seek to site all of its business functions in the downtown area. CF-59 All "people oriented" City facilities should be located in high amenity sites. Les Grove Park and Downtown are particularly appropriate sites for services such as senior services, community center, library, museums, etc. CF-60 City park buildings should be developed in accord with the Parks and Recreation Element. CF-61 The siting, design construction and improvement of all public buildings and spaces shall be done in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA). CF-62 Public and institutional facilities which attract a large number of visitors (City Hall, museums, libraries, educational, permit or license offices, and health or similar facilities, etc.) should be sited in areas which are accessible (within 114 mile) by transit. CF-63 The City shall encourage other agencies to follow these siting principles in considering new sites for public buildings. CF-64 The location of religious institutions, private schools, community centers, parks and similar public or institutional facilities shall be related to the size of the facility and the area served. City-wide facilities should be sited in visible and accessible locations. CF-65 Small public or institutional facilities intended to serve one or two residential neighborhoods may be located within a neighborhood. Larger public or institutional facilities intended to serve mainly • Auburn residents or businesses shall be located along major arterial roads within the Community ORI: ,__^_._....._...... _ .... __..._. _ rtrjur"?131 of 751 I9 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Serving Area of Auburn, however, elementary schools should be given flexibility to locate along smaller roads. Buffering from adjacent land uses may be required. CF-66 The location of utility facilities is often dependent upon the physical requirements of the utility system. Sewage lift stations, pump stations, water reservoirs, and other similar facilities should be sited, designed, and buffered (through extensive screening and/or landscaping) to fit in with their surroundings harmoniously. When sited within or adjacent to residential areas. special attention should be given to minimizing noise, light and glare impacts. CF-67 Public facilities of an industrial or heavy commercial character should be confined to the Region Serving Area of Auburn, unless no other reasonable siting opportunity exists in which case siting still must comply with applicable zoning standards. Examples of such facilities are the City maintenance and operations facility, state and regional solid waste facilities, and the Auburn School District bus barn. CF-68 The siting and relocation of City maintenance and operation facilities shall be responsive to growing demands for utility,transportation and fleet services and shall also take into account the City's role in emergency preparedness and response. Essential Public Facilities: According to the GMA (RCW 36.70A.200). "Essential public facilities include those facilities that are typically difficult to site such as airports, state education facilities, state or regional transportation facilities as defined in RCW 47.06.140, state and local correctional facilities, solid waste handling facilities, and in-patient facilities including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities, group homes, and secure community transition facilities as defined in RCW 71.09.020." More generally. essential public facilities are facilities, conveyances, or sites that meet the following definition: (1)the facility, conveyance or site is used to provide services to the public: (2) these services are delivered by government agencies, private or non-profit organizations under contract to or with substantial funding from government agencies, or private firms or organizations subject to public service obligations, and (3) the facility or use of the site is necessary to adequately provide a public service. The Growth Management Act requires that every comprehensive plan include a process for siting essential public facilities. No comprehensive plan can preclude the siting of essential public facilities within the community. The Growth Management Act includes these provisions because siting certain public facilities has become difficult due to the impacts many of these facilities have on the adjacent community. Many factors contribute to this problem, including increased demand for facilities to serve a growing population, increased competition for land as the state becomes more urbanized, problems with siting processes, and judicial decisions which compel jurisdictions to provide certain facilities. By including a process for siting essential facilities in the Comprehensive Plan, deficiencies in the siting process can be minimized. This section contains Auburn's process for siting essential public facilities. This is an interim process until development regulations are incorporated into city code. When that process is developed, Auburn may modify these procedures to reflect the Council's recommendation. CF-69 Essential Public Facility Siting Process. General: 1. The City will review proposals through the process outlined in parts (3) through (8) below. if the essential public facility largely serves a regional. countywide, statewide or national need and is included in a policy sense within an adopted state or regional plan which meets the following criteria: a. The state or regional plan was developed through an appropriate public process (including at least one local public hearing) and has undergone a NEPA and/or SEPA review; and: ORDT Pagl82 of 751 110 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 b. A clear policy statement supporting the type of facility proposed must be included. The plan should also include, in a policy sense, a set of siting guidelines used for such a facility. Such S criteria may include, but not be limited to, type and sufficiency of transportation access, co- location requirements, preferred adjacent land uses, on-or off-site security and/or mitigation, and required public facilities and services. 2. If the essential public facility largely serves a regional. countywide. statewide or national need and is not part of an adopted state or regional plan, the proponent will be required to request that the appropriate state or regional plan be amended to include the proposal meeting the criteria contained in part (1) above. The proposal will also be reviewed following the process outlined in parts (3)through (8). Essential Public Facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide, or national nature: 3. Essential public facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide or national nature will be reviewed by the City through the special area plan process. The boundaries of the Special Area Plan will be set at a scale directly related to the size and magnitude of the proposal. For facilities of regional, state. and national need, an alternative analysis will be performed using, but not limited to. the guidelines described in part 1 (above). Auburn staff shall participate in the review process of part 1 (above), and use the data, analysis and environmental documents prepared in that process to aid in the City's special area plan review, if Auburn determines that those documents are adequate. If the facility requires other development permits. those approvals also shall be considered within the review process. 4. Impacts of the proposed essential public facility must be identified and an appropriate mitigation plan developed. Unless otherwise governed by State law, the financing strategy for the mitigation plan shall be structured so that the costs of the plan shall be allocated proportionally on a benefit basis using, but not limited to, non-local sources of funding. 5. The special area plan process to be used for essential public facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide or national nature shall follow the City's Comprehensive Plan amendment process which includes multiple opportunities for public involvement. 6. An analysis of the facility's impact on City finances shall be undertaken. If the study shows that locating a facility in a community would result in a disproportionate financial burden on the City of Auburn. an agreement with the project's proponents must be executed to mitigate the adverse financial impact or the approval shall be denied. Essential Public Facilities of primarily local nature: 7. If the essential public facility meets largely local needs (for example, in-patient facilities, including substance abuse facilities, mental health facilities and group homes), the facility shall be considered based upon section (8) below. All Essential Public Facilities: 8. The following criteria shall be used to evaluate all applications to site essential public facilities: a. Whether there is a public need for the facility. b. The impact of the facility on the surrounding uses and environment, the City and the region. c. Whether the design of the facility or the operation of the facility can be conditioned. or the impacts mitigated, in a similar manner as with a traditional private development, to make the facility compatible with the affected area and the environment. OR 3 of 751 Page 111 DRAFT CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 d. Whether a package of mitigating measures can be developed that would make siting the facility within the community more acceptable. e. Whether the factors that make the facility difficult to site can be modified to increase the range of available sites or to minimize impacts on affected areas and the environment. f. Whether the proposed essential public facility is consistent with the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. g. Essential public facilities shall comply with any applicable state siting and permitting requirements (e.g., hazardous waste facilities). h. Whether the State proves by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that 1) a sufficient and reasonable number of alternative sites have been fully, fairly, and competently considered; and 2) such sites were found to be unsuitable for an SCTF for reasons other than the cost of property. i. Whether careful analysis has been completed to show that siting of the facility will have no undue impact on any one racial, cultural, or socio-economic group, and that there will not be a resulting concentration of similar facilities in a particular neighborhood, community, jurisdiction or region. CF-70 The Director shall make a determination as to whether a development application will result in a significant change of use or a significant change in the intensity of use of an existing essential public facility. If the Planning Director determines that the proposed changes are significant. the proposal will be subject to the essential public facility siting process as defined in Policy CF-69. If the Planning Director determines that the proposed changes are insignificant, the application shall be reviewed through the City's standard development review procedures. The Planning Director's determination shall be based upon the following: 1. The proposal's impacts on the surrounding area 2. The likelihood that there will be future additions, expansions, or further activity related to or connected with the proposal. One of the difficulties of siting essential public facilities is that they are not allowed in all appropriate areas. To help address this problem, Auburn shall allow essential public facilities in those zones in which they would be compatible. The types of facilities that are compatible will vary with the impacts likely from the facility and the zoning district. In the M-2 Zoning District, many essential public facilities will be compatible uses and broad use categories allowing such uses should be included in the zone. CF-71 Essential public facilities shall be allowed in those zoning districts in which they would be compatible and impacts can be mitigated. In situations where specific development standards cannot be met, but there is a determination that the facility can be made compatible, the City Council can waive those specific standards with the requirement that appropriate mitigation is provided. The M-2 Zoning District should include broad use categories that allow all essential public facilities that are difficult to site as permitted or conditional uses as appropriate. CF-72 Essential public facilities should be equitably located throughout the City, county and state. No jurisdiction should absorb a disproportionate share. CF-73 Essential public facilities of a regional, countywide, statewide or national nature should be restricted to the Region Serving Area of Auburn. Such facilities should be located in relationship to transportation facilities in a manner appropriate to their transportation needs, Extensive buffering from adjacent uses may be required. Facilities which generate a significant amount of truck traffic should be located on major arterial streets. OR n . �t -.- :4 of 751 112 AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - VOLUME 4 • Private Utilities Element PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT VISION Private Utilities in Auburn are planned, designed, and constructed in a manner that adequately supports future growth scenarios that are predicted in the City's Land Use Element and that meet the needs of residents, visitors and businesses. Sustainability is a principal that guides decisions for where utilities are placed, how they are constructed, how they are operated and maintained, and how all aspects of design, construction and operation are funded. PRIVATE UTILITIES CONDITIONS Electricity and Natural Gas: Puget Sound Energy (PSE) provides electrical and natural gas service to the City of Auburn and its potential annexation area. PSE is an investor-owned private utility which provides service to approximately 1.2 million customers in a service area that covers 6,000 square miles. With respect to electrical service, PSE builds, operates and maintains an electrical system consisting of generation, transmission and distribution facilities. Facility technology for electricity transmission may change in the future in response to the need to create more efficient facilities and in response to various electromagnetic field and health concerns and diversification of resources. Utility policies should be updated in the future to take into consideration changes in technology, facilities, and services. Natural Gas: The Northwest Pipeline Corporation and Enumclaw Natural Gas also have gas lines in the southeastern portion of the City. Northwest Pipeline Corporation's only customer in Auburn is Enumclaw Natural Gas. Enumclaw Natural Gas serves Auburn residential customers in the area of the Adventist • Academy. Telecommunications: Telecommunications include a wide range of services including conventional telephone, cellular telephone and cable television. Technology in the field of telecommunications continues to change rapidly. Conventional Telephone Conventional local telephone service to the City is provided by Century Link. Century Link is a global provider of telecommunications services. The facilities in which calls are switched are called central offices. Typically there are four main lines heading out from each central office - one in each direction. Auburn's central office is located in downtown Auburn. Long distance service is provided in the area by several providers. These providers have underground fiber optic cables passing through the City of Auburn. Cellular Telephone Cellular telecommunications provide mobile telephone communications via radios that send and receive signals from a network of receivers mounted on utility poles, towers, buildings or other structures on private property or within the right of way. Cellular communication companies offer digital voice, messaging and high speed wireless data services to customers. Cellular telephone service within the City and its potential annexation areas is provided by multiple private companies providing service throughout the Puget Sound region. Regulation of cellular providers is • ORD.E Page 185 of 751 DRAFT PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 provided by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Technology and business practices in the area of telecommunications continues to change rapidly. Cable Television Cable television service is provided by Comcast through a combination of aerial and underground cables. The location of existing and planned cable lines are shown on Map 6.4. INTRODUCTION The Growth Management Act requires the City of Auburn to include a utilities element within its Comprehensive Plan. The element should provide a framework for the efficient and predictable provision and siting of utility facilities and services within the City consistent with the serving utilities public service obligations. This element covers private utilities, (those not provided by the City of Auburn) and includes electricity, telecommunications, and natural gas. City owned water. sewer. and stormwater utilities are described within the Capital Facilities Element (Chapter 5) of this comprehensive plan. Investor owned utilities in the State of Washington are regulated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). State law regulates the rates, charges, services facilities and practices of utilities. Any changes in policies regarding these aspects of utility provision require WUTC approval. The primary responsibility for planning for private utilities rests with the utility providers. Clearly. however. this planning can not take place without open lines of communication between the City and the utility providers. The City acknowledges that some private utility providers are not willing to provide capacity or future construction plans as some of this information may effect their competitiveness or be considered to be proprietary. The utilities, however, must recognize that this may hinder the City's ability to assist them in their projects. Values: Character- Private utilities will provide a positive contribution to the quality, aesthetics and functionality of the community. Wellness - Utility infrastructure and systems support the delivery of safe and efficient electircity, gas, and telecommunications Service - Utility infrastructure and systems support the City's goals of providing accessible and transparent government services and processes. Economy - Businesses are served by utility infrastructure that meets or exceeds the needs for entry into the market and future growth. Celebration - Telecommunication systems are fully utilized to reach a broader cross section of the community in a way that brings people together for civic activities. cultural events. and social awareness. Environment - Siting. installation and maintenance of utilities will ensure protection, preservation and respect of the wildlife habitat, water quality, and environmentally sensitive features. Sustainable - When designing, constructing and maintaining utilities the long term investment horizon is favored over concepts that provide short term benefits and outcomes. General Policies Objective 1.1 To allow the development of private utilities to meet the needs of the existing community and provide for its planned growth consistent with the serving utilities public service obligations. ORS 6 of 751 I2 DRAFT PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Policies: PU-1 Private utility companies are recognized as providers of important services necessary to maintain • current and future lifestyles. PU-2 Private utility providers should refer to the City's Comprehensive Plan Map for guidance regarding future land uses and intensities. Private utility facilities and systems should be consistent with the uses and densities allowed by the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code. The City will regularly provide this information and information on pending development proposals (both public and private) to the appropriate provider. In return. the City expects there to be a cooperative posture towards coordinated and sensitive expansion of the infrastructure. PU-3 Private utility companies should strive to provide utility services to all segments of the Auburn population and areas of the community. Objective 1.2 To improve the safety, visual quality, and efficiency of private utility facilities consistent with the serving utilities public service. Policies: PU-4 The City shall require that new private utility distribution, service and telecommunication lines be located underground within all new developments. The City will also work with the utility companies to relocate existing distribution, service and telecommunication lines underground as a part of new development. whenever it is technologically feasible and as part of City capital roadway projects whenever it is economically and technologically feasible. Expansions and upgrades completed by private utilities will be required to be underground unless they meet appropriate exemptions. PU-5 Common utility trenches should be encouraged and coordinated by both private and public • providers whenever possible. PU-6 To reduce visual clutter, antennas, relay mechanisms and similar structures should be located on existing poles, structures, or buildings whenever possible. When deemed feasible and necessary to minimize impacts on adjacent uses or views by the City, visual screening may be required. PU-7 The City shall consider the environmental impacts of proposed utility facilities as a part of its environmental review process. When requested by the City, the utility provider shall furnish documentation of current research results and/or provide additional information related to determining the environmental impacts, if any, of the proposed facilities. PU-8 The construction of facilities and provision of services by private utility providers within the City of Auburn shall be in compliance with all of the goals and policies of this comprehensive plan. PU-9 Decisions regarding private utility facilities within Auburn should consider the safe, adequate and efficient availability of these utilities to other jurisdictions. PU-10 The location of utility facilities is often dependent upon the physical requirements of the utility system. All utility facilities should be sited, designed, and buffered (through extensive screening and/or landscaping) to fit in with their surroundings harmoniously and safely. When sited within or adjacent to residential areas, special attention should be given to minimizing noise, light and glare impacts. • ORE ' - -mhtermow — —----_� _ -- Par-1'87 of 751 13 Exhibit 7 AUBURN WASHINGTON • Corn re ensive Transportation Plan • Adopted by Ordinance No. XXXX December X, 2015 • ORD.E Page 188 of 751 AUBURN WASH I NGTON Table of Contents Page Chapter 1 Introduction 1 - 1 1.1 Purpose 1 - 1 1.2 How the City Uses the Plan 1 - 2 1.3 Regional Coordination 1 - 4 1.4 Accomplishments Since the Last Plan 1 - 7 1.5 Plan Organization 1 - 9 1.6 Staff Resources 1 - 10 Chapter 2 The Street System 2 - 1 2.1 Existing Street System 2 - 1 2.2 Street Standards and Levels-of-Service 2 - 8 2.3 Future Street System 2 - 13 Chapter 3 Non-Motorized Transportation 3 - 1 3.1 Pedestrian Travel 3 - 1 3.2 Bicycle Travel 3 - 9 3.3 Equestrian Travel 3 - 12 3.4 Future Non-Motorized System 3 - 14 Chapter 4 Transit 4 - 1 4.1 Needs Assessment 4 - 1 4.2 Transit User Needs 4 - 5 4.3 Transit System Recommendations 4 - 10 Chapter 5 Policies 5 - 1 5.1 Coordination, Planning and Implementation 5 - 2 5.2 Street System 5 - 14 5.3 Non-Motorized System 5 - 22 5.4 Transit System 5 - 27 5.5 Air Transportation 5 - 28 Chapter 6 Funding 6 - 1 6.1 Financial Planning and Programming 6 - 1 6.2 Funding Sources 6 - 2 6.3 Funding Strategies and Project Prioritization 6 - 6 Chapter 7 Monitoring and Evaluation 7 - 1 7.1 Annual Updates 7 - 1 7.2 Multi-Year Updates 7 - 2 List of Maps and Figures Page Map 1-1 Adjacent Jurisdictions 1 - 6 Figure 1-1 Transportation Program Staff Resources 1 - 10 Map 2-1 Functional Roadway Classifications ORD.E Page 189 of 751 AUBURN • WASIilN(,ION Map 2-2 Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2013) Map 2-3 Truck Route Map Map 2-4 Freight Route Classification Map Map 2-5 Auburn LOS Corridors Figure 2-1 Population, Housing and Job Growth (2000 - 2035) 2 - 13 Map 2-6 Transportation Improvement Projects Map 2-7 Intelligent Transportation Systems Map 3-1 Existing Sidewalks and Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors Map 3-2 Existing and Future Bicycle Facilities and Multi-Use Trails Map 3-3 Bicycle Corridors and Connectors Map 4-1 Auburn Transit Routes and MIT Shuttle Route Map 4-2 Auburn Transit Routes and Transit Dependent Areas *Map located following the chapter corresponding to the Map number. List of Tables Page • Table 1-1 Transportation Improvements Completed Since 2009 1 - 8 Table 2-1 Existing (2014) Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 10 Table 2-2 2022 Capacity Projects 2 - 14 Table 2-3 2022 Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 19 Table 2-4 2035 Capacity Projects 2 - 21 Table 2-5 2035 Corridor Levels of Service 2 - 25 Table 3-1 Existing Equestrian Facilities 3 - 13 Table 3-2 Future Trail Projects 3 - 14 • ORD.E Page 190 of 751 CRY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN r' CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION The transportation system is a vital component of Auburn's social, economic, and physical structure. The primary purpose of the transportation system is to support the Auburn Station movement of people and goods within the City and connect the City to the broader region. Secondarily, it influences patterns of growth, development and economic activity by providing access to adjacent land uses. Planning for the development and maintenance of the transportation system is a critical activity promoting the efficient movement of people and goods, ensuring emergency access, and optimizing the role transportation plays in attaining other community objectives. 1.1 PURPOSE The Comprehensive Transportation Plan is the framework for transportation planning in Auburn. It functions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system. The Plan evaluates the existing system by identifying key assets and improvement needs. These findings are then incorporated into a needs assessment,which guides the future of the transportation system. This Plan is multi-modal, addressing multiple forms of transportation in Auburn including the street network,non-motorized travel, and transit. Evaluating all modes enables the City to address its future transportation needs in a comprehensive and balanced manner. VISION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan reflects the current and future needs of the Auburn community and,in doing so, seeks to: • Enhance the quality of life for all Auburn residents; • Encourage healthy community principles through non-motorized travel; • Promote a transportation system that supports local businesses and enhances economic development opportunities; • Create a transportation system that is efficient,uncomplicated, and welcoming to visitors;and • Provide a balanced, multi-modal transportation system that addresses both local and regional needs. Chapter 1.Introduction ANL 1- 1 ORD.E Page 191 of 751 AMY OT Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON 41111 GMA REQUIREMENTS Washington State's 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that transportation planning be directly tied to the City's land use decisions and fiscal planning. This is traditionally accomplished through the adoption of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Auburn fulfills this mandate by adopting the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as the Transportation Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. In order to be GMA compliant, the Comprehensive Transportation Plan must: • Inventory the existing transportation system in order to identify existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning; • Identify level-of-service (LOS) standards for all arterials, transit routes, and state-owned facilities as a gauge for evaluating system performance; • Specify actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level-of-service standard; • Determine existing deficiencies of the system; • Use land use assumptions to estimate future travel,including impacts to state-owned facilities; • Identify future improvement needs from at least ten years of traffic forecasts based on the adopted land use plan; • Include a multiyear financing plan based on the identified needs; • Address intergovernmental coordination;and • Include transportation demand management strategies. 1.2 How the City Uses the Plan The Comprehensive Transportation Plan provides policy and technical direction for development of the City's transportation system through the year 2035. It updates and expands the 2009 Comprehensive Transportation Plan by recognizing network changes since the last plan, evaluating current needs, and identifying standards for future development and various infrastructure improvement scenarios. The Plan underwent a major update in 2005 and a midterm update in 2009 to incorporate the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas into the Plan. NEEDS ASSESSMENT A system-wide, multi-modal needs assessment was conducted throughout plan development to ascertain which aspects of Auburn's existing transportation system work well and which ones need improvement. An evaluation of potential solutions and investment priorities was also conducted as part of this process. The end result is that Auburn has a more thorough understanding of system deficiencies, how best to address these deficiencies, and direction for expanding the system in a sustainable manner. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public outreach is an important component of the ongoing needs assessment process. During 2014 the City held a number of community meetings through the Imagine Auburn visioning • Chapter J. Introduction Mo. I-2 ORD.E Page 192 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN • WASHING ION process. The meetings included discussions of capital investments in transportation infrastructure and other transportation related issues which have been incorporated into this document. As part of the adoption process, the Plan is also reviewed by the City of Auburn Planning Commission, including a hearing where members of the public are provided the opportunity to provide input on the plan,and is then reviewed and adopted by the City Council. POLICY DEVELOPMENT The City creates policies to state preferences for preservation of the existing system and development of the future transportation system. Policies can be qualitative in nature, but often they are quantitative and prescribe a specific standard. Policies are also important for communicating the City's values and needs to neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies. Having established policies in place enables the City to more effectively influence change in keeping with its needs and objectives. LOS AND CONCURRENCY The concurrency provisions of the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) require that local governments permit development only if adequate public facilities exist, or can be guaranteed to be available within six years, to support new development. The GMA requires each local jurisdiction to identify facility and service needs based on level-of- service (LOS) standards. Auburn ensures that future development will not cause the system's performance to fall below the adopted LOS standard by doing one or a combination of the following: limiting development, requiring appropriate mitigation, or changing the adopted standard. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City uses the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) to develop a financial plan for capital improvements in Auburn, thus enabling the City to fulfill the GMA requirement of having a multiyear financing plan based on the identified transportation needs. The TIP, is a financial planning tool used to implement the list of transportation improvement projects identified in the Transportation Plan. It is a six-year plan which is reviewed and updated annually by the City Council to reflect changes to project priorities and funding circumstances. The first three years of the plan are fiscally constrained. Traffic impact fees on new development are determined by the cost of the capacity projects included in the TIP. The Capital Facilities Plan is also an annually adopted six-year financing plan. However, it is fiscally constrained for all six years. Unlike the TIP, the CFP is an adopted element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 1. Introdndeon Page 1-3 ORD.E Page 193 of 751 AUBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON • 1.3 REGIONAL COORDINATION In addition to being influenced by factors within the City, Auburn's transportation system is influenced by what happens beyond its City limits: growth in neighboring communities, infrastructure maintenance by regional agencies, the lack of funding for road maintenance, new capacity projects, and competing demands for transit services. This Plan calls for effective interjurisdictional actions to address cross-border issues and to mitigate the impact of new development. The Plan also recognizes that other jurisdictions, particularly state agencies and transit providers,are responsible for a major share of the transportation facilities serving Auburn. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has jurisdiction over three major routes connecting Auburn to the region: SR-167, SR-18, and SR-164 (Auburn Way South). Auburn coordinates with WSDOT to study these corridors and implement roadway improvements. WSDOT also serves an important role as administrator of federal and state transportation funds. SOUND TRANSIT Sound Transit provides a variety of regional transit services for King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. In Auburn, Sound Transit provides commuter rail and express bus service. Auburn Station also serves as a hub and transfer station for local transit service provided by King County Metro Transit and Pierce Transit. The transit chapter provides more detail on current Sound Transit services, remaining needs for regional transit service,and the role Auburn plays in coordinating with the agency. KING COUNTY King County Metro Transit, a division of the King County Department of Transportation, provides local bus service for the Auburn area. Planned service for the City of Auburn is described in the Metro Strategic Plan for Public Transportation 2011-2021 and in Metro's Long Range Public Transportation Plan now under development and expected to be completed in 2016. The City has developed an employee Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program in cooperation with Metro Transit. Details of the CTR program are summarized in the Non-motorized and Transit chapters of this plan. Auburn partners with King County Metro Transit on the 497 bus route, which provides peak hour service from Lakeland Hills to the Auburn Station. Auburn and King County Metro Transit hope to continue this relationship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in Auburn. King County Road Services Division is responsible for maintaining and regulating the roadway network in King County,including the Totem and Klump portions of King County located inside the City limits. King County Road Services has a number of programs and plans in place that regulate development and other activities affecting their roadway network. • Chapter 1. ham/action Page 1-4 ORD.E Page 194 of 751 MY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN W'ASIIINGIt1N PIERCE COUNTY Auburn partners with Pierce Transit on the 497 bus route,which provides peak hour service from Lakeland Hills to the Auburn Station. Auburn and Pierce Transit hope to continue this relationship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in Auburn. Auburn also participates in The Regional Access Mobility Partnership (RAMP), a regional coalition comprised of both public and private sector interests dedicated to improving mobility in the South Puget Sound and Washington State. COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES Under the Growth Management Act, King and Pierce Counties have adopted Countywide Planning Policies to guide development in both incorporated and unincorporated areas of their jurisdictions. The policies support county and regional goals to provide a variety of mobility options and establish LOS standards that emphasize the efficient movement of people and not just vehicles. The Countywide Planning Policies are also important because they provide direction for planning and development of potential annexation areas. PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) sets policy for King, Pierce, Kitsap, and Snohomish counties through its long-range planning document, Vision 2040, and its regional transportation plan, Transportation 2040. Both documents encourage future growth to be concentrated in regional growth centers. They also seek to provide a multi-modal transportation system that serves all travel modes, actively encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupant vehicles. Another important policy theme is a focus on maximizing the efficiency of the transportation system through transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation system management (TSM) strategies,as well as completing critical links in the network. Auburn's Transportation Plan is required to be consistent with PSRC's regional planning efforts. ADJACENT CITIES The City recognizes the importance of coordinated and strong inter-jurisdictional action because transportation impacts do not stop at local boundaries. The City works closely with neighboring cities and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to address transportation issues. These neighbors adopt goals and policies that directly impact Auburn. In developing this plan, analysis was undertaken to ensure that all transportation system improvements are compatible with neighboring jurisdictions. CITY OF KENT The City of Kent shares Auburn's northern border and several regional transportation corridors including S 277th Street, SR 167, and the West Valley Highway. Most recently, Auburn has completed coordination with Kent on the annexation of the S 277th Street from Auburn Way North to the Green River into the City of Auburn to allow the widening of S 277th Street between Auburn Way N and L Street NE. Chapter 1.Introduction Poe 1-.5 ORD.E Page 195 of 751 A[TBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON • CITY OF FEDERAL WAY ' The City of Federal Way is located west of Auburn. Several roadways, most notably SR 18, '` connect Auburn and Federal Way. Auburn and • - Federal Way regularly coordinate on both • _-_ ,✓''•. motorized and non-motorized roadway improvements affecting both jurisdictions. CITES OF SUMNER/ALGONA/PACIFIC/BONNEY r ' LAKE s ' ' _I The City partners with its southern neighbors in - many respects, including street system planning, f. I --' transit planning, and regional trail planning. WM Auburn is also working with Sumner, Pacific and Algona on roadway improvement projects, including the recent preservation of Boundary Boulevard in partnership with Algona, and financial support of Pacific's project to widen - • Stewart Road to the west of the White River. The •• J :a. City coordinates primarily with Bonney Lake for provision of water service in the Pierce County Map 1-1 Adjacent Jurisdictions portion of the City. However, efforts to coordinate transportation systems and services will likely • occur in the future. Partnerships with neighboring cities will continue to be an important factor in successful transportation planning. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) is situated in the southeastern portion of the City and in unincorporated King County, generally to the east of Auburn Way South (SR-164) and south of SR-18. The Mucideshoot Tribe operates two major attractions in or near Auburn: the Muckleshoot Casino and the White River Amphitheatre. Both of these activity centers generate a large number of vehicle trips. Commercial development on tribal lands is expected to increase in the future and must be evaluated during transportation planning efforts. The City and tribe coordinate on a variety of transportation planning issues,both to accommodate the capacity needs derived from traffic generated by tribal land uses and to ensure the tribe has a functioning transportation system for its members. The Muckleshoot Tribe has developed their own Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, a Transportation Plan and a Tribal Transportation Improvement Program have been created to identify transportation needs and plan for the next seven generations. One theme that is emerging from this effort is the need to build a well-connected internal roadway system on the reservation. Currently,Auburn Way South is the primary route for drivers and pedestrians traveling within the reservation. This extensive internal network will increase transportation efficiency and most importantly improve safety along the Auburn Way South corridor. The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and the City of Auburn have created a partnership to provide safety improvements along Auburn • Chapter I. In rodiiaion Page 1-o ORD.E Page 196 of 751 AOtBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON Way South. These improvements are currently under construction and arc anticipated to be complete in the Spring of 2017. During July 2015, the State Legislature passed a transportation package which included a $15 million project to construct a new off-ramp from eastbound SR-18 to SR-164. At this time the scope and alignment of this new connection are not know,however,the City will be working with the MIT and WSDOT in the design process. 1.4 Accomplishments Since the Last Plan Since 2009, the City has completed numerous transportation improvements, with an emphasis on providing new road capacity, improving pedestrian and bicycle safety, preservation of existing infrastructure,and providing better access to regional transit services including commuter rail. Table 1-1 shows the key projects completed since the 2009 plan. The completed projects list includes the grade separation of M Street SE and the A Street NW corridor, which provides a parallel connection to Auburn Way N between downtown Auburn and S 272nd Street. Chapter 1. Intl-auction Page 1- 7 ORD.E Page 197 of 751 • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • Table 1-1. Transportation Improvements Completed Since 2009 Type of # Project Name Location Improvement 1 M Street SE Underpass M St SE(3rd SE to 8'h SE) Roadway 2 A Street Corridor NW New Road(3`h NW to 14th NW) Roadway 3 ITS Improvements, Phase B S 277th to City Hall Signal and ITS 4 8th Street NE and R Street eh St NE&R St NE Signal&ITS 5 A Street SE Pedestrian Improvements A St SE(3th St SE to 6th St SE) Non-Motorized 6 37th Street SE and R Street SE Pedestrian 37th St SE(Olympic to R St SE) Non-Motorized Connector 7 SE 316th Place Traffic Calming Improvements SE 316th Place(112th to 116th) Safety 8 Terrace Drive Re-channelization Terrace Dr. NW(15th to W St) Safety 9 2009 Sidewalk Improvements Citywide Non-Motorized 10 2009 Citywide Arterial Pavement Patching Citywide Preservation 11 Citywide Guardrail Improvements Citywide Safety 12 F Street SE and 4th Street SE Traffic Signal F St SE&4"h St SE Intersection,Safety 13 West Valley Highway Improvements WVH,W Main St to SR-18 Roadway 14 Citywide School Zone Flashing Beacons Citywide Safety 15 2010 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation 16 South AuburnITS Improvements C St SW,A St SE Signal and ITS 17 S Division Street Main St to 3th St SE/SW Roadway 18 8th Street NE Re-channelization M St NE to 104th Roadway 19 2010 Traffic Signal Improvements Citywide Signal&ITS 20 Auburn Way South&M St Improvement's AWS&M St SE Intersection, Safety 21 2011 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation 22 8th and 104th Signal Improvements 8th St NE&104th Ave SE Intersection,Safety 23 2011 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements Citywide Non-motorized 24 Auburn Way South Phase 1 — Dogwood to Fir Roadway 25 Auburn Way South Phase 2— Fir to Hemlock Roadway 26 Lea Hill Safe Routes to School 116th Ave SE, SE 312th St Safety 27 2011 Local Street Reconstruction Citywide Preservation 28 2012 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation 29 15th and WVH SW Repairs 15th St SW&WVH Signal&ITS 30 Traffic Signal Battery Backup Improvements BNSF Grade Crossings Signal&ITS 31 Citywide Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Citywide Signal&ITS,Safety • Chapter I. Intmdwction 1'.;:, l-S ORD.E Page 198 of 751 rY01 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING ION Project Name Location Type of Improvement 32 2013 Local Street Preservation Citywide Preservation 33 West Valley Highway Preservation WVH, 15'"NW to 37th NW Preservation 34 8th Street NE ITS Improvements 8'"St NE(M St to 104'"Ave SE) Signal&ITS 35 2013 Sidewalk Repairs Citywide Non-Motorized 36 2013 Arterial Pavement Patching Citywide Preservation 37 37th and B Street Pre-Signal 37th St NW&B St NW Signal&ITS,Safety 38 29th and A SE Repairs 29'"&A St SE Signal&ITS 39 E Main Signal Pole Replacement E Main St&Auburn Way Signal&ITS 40 East Valley Hwy Overlay Peirce County Limits Preservation 41 2013 Arterial Crackseal Citywide Preservation 42 2014 Traffic Signal Improvements Citywide Preservation 43 2014 Local Street Improvements Citywide Preservation 44 2014 Citywide Arterial Pavement Preservation Citywide Preservation 45 2014 Citywide Arterial Crackseal Citywide Preservation 46 R Street SE Bicycle Lanes 17"'St SE to White River Non-Motorized 47 B Street NW Bicycle Lanes 3rd St NW to 30'"St NW Non-Motorized 48 Terrace Drive NW Bicycle Lanes 15"'St NW to W St NW Non-Motorized 49 Dogwood Street SE Bicycle Lanes 21st St SE to Skyway Lane Non-Motorized 50 West Valley Highway Bicycle Lanes Main St to SR-18 Non-Motorized 51 14th Street NW Bicycle Lanes B St NW to A St NE Non-Motorized 52 116th Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 304"'St to SE 312'"St Non-Motorized 53 124th Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 316'"St to SE 320"'St Non-Motorized 54 132nd Avenue SE Bicycle Lanes SE 304'"St to SE 312"'St Non-Motorized 55 M Street SE Bicycle Lanes 4'"St SE to 89'St SE Non-Motorized 56 Evergreen Way SE* New Roadway Roadway 57 I Street NE* New Roadway Roadway *These projects were constructed by others as part of private development projects 1.5 Plan Organization The following three chapters are organized according to the three primary transportation modes in Auburn: the street system (Chapter 2), the non-motorized system (Chapter 3), and the transit system (Chapter 4). Each chapter contains a needs assessment and discussion of the future system,including proposed projects or improvements. Chapter 1. Introduction f'i' 1-9 ORD.E Page 199 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • The remaining chapters cover subjects pertaining to all three system types. Chapter 5 details the City's transportation objectives and policies. Chapter 6 discusses funding sources that can be used to finance future network improvements. Chapter 7 identifies a monitoring and evaluation strategy to ensure the document remains relevant and that progress is made towards implementation of the Plan. 1.6 Staff Resources Implementation of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan requires numerous resources, including staff time. All departments play a role in executing the Plan, but the Community Development & Public Works (CDPW) Department is the implementation lead. The CDPW Department employs engineers, planners, technical and support staff, and maintenance and operations personnel to maintain and improve the City's transportation system. Nonetheless, staff performs many functions and dedicating sufficient resources to carry out the goals of this plan continues to present challenges. Figure 1-1 identifies the basic organization of the CPDW Department. Figure 1-1 Transportation Program Staff Resources (2015) • ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF ASSSSTAAIT DIRECTOR DP Pueuc WORKS OPERATIONS' ENGINEERING/C:ITV ENGINEER STREETNEGETATIUN TRANSPORTATION MANAGER MANAGER STREET ,. SUPERVISOR SECT SYSTEM 7RAI FIE TRAVEIC OPERATIONS ENGINEER E.MI INI.•LRS ENCANLER -- MA!N?FNAsICE WCREEFR I CDL MAINTENANCE WCIRKCA II CDL ENI1NEFAINC Tpm-AORTA-WA TRArFIC.OPCRlT,ONS P+7sfT1UN') 16 PO5rTTONE4 AIDE . ,PU%NNE11 TED-INK/AN TRACES SRSNAI. TEGINSPAN 111 Clapler 1.1n/rod/Own Page 1-10 ORD.E Page 200 of 751 my°, Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Chapter 2. THE STREET SYSTEM The City is served by an extensive street network, which — - ~'-+ '_ includes highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets. , ! �- The Auburn transportation system is designed to . 4�� accommodate all modes of travel. This chapter describes the network and how well it serves the City both existing and future. Auburn Way S at M Street SE 2.1 Existing Street System FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION The street system functions as a network. Functional classification is the hierarchy by which streets and highways are defined according to the character of service they provide. There are three main classes of streets in Auburn: arterials, collectors, and local streets. Existing street classifications are shown in Map 2-1. All streets have been classified using the Federal Functional Classification system guidelines. No significant changes have been made to the classification of City streets from the previous Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Auburn Engineering Design Standards identifies design standards for each type of City street, in conformance with WSDOT and AASHTO standards. From a planning perspective, acknowledgment and proper designation of functional classifications allows for the preservation of right-of-way for future transportation corridors, whether the corridor provides access to car, HOV, transit, bike, or pedestrian use. Functional classification helps establish corridors that will provide for the future movement of people and goods, as well as emergency vehicle access. Proper designation is crucial to the planning effort;as development occurs, accommodation for the appropriate transportation corridors should be incorporated into development plans. STATE HIGHWAYS SR-18—connects I-5 to I-90 through Auburn. Within the City limits, SR-18 has interchanges with SR- 167, West Valley Highway, C Street, SR-164/Auburn Way S, Auburn Black Diamond Road, and SE 304th Street providing access to downtown Auburn and Lea Hill. It is classified as both a Highway of Statewide Significance (HSS) and a National Highway System (NHS) route for the entire corridor segment. SR-18 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within the City limits. SR-167 - also known as the Valley Freeway, serves as an alternative to I-5, connecting South King and north Pierce counties to the 1-405 corridor to the north. SR-167 is designated as both HSS and NHS. Within the City limits, SR-167 has interchanges with SR-18, S 277th Street, 15th Street NW, and 15th Street SW. SR-167 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within the City limits. Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2. 1 ORD.E Page 201 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN 11;�1111t\c;I�1N • SR-164 - is a 15-mile roadway corridor beginning at the SR-18 interchange with Auburn Way S. The corridor is aligned southeast through the City, connecting with the Muckleshoot Tribal Reservation and White River Amphitheater, and unincorporated King County before terminating in the City of Enumclaw at its junction with SR-410. SR-164 is a City street which is part of a State Highway. It is classified as an urban minor arterial by WSDOT, and also a HSS. The City of Auburn classifies is as a principal arterial.SR-164 does not have the same access restrictions as found on SR-18 and SR-167. ARTERIALS Arterials are the highest level of City street classification. There are two types of arterials in Auburn. Principal Arterials are designed to move traffic between locations within the region and connect with the freeway system. Design emphasis is placed on providing movement for both inter- and intra-city traffic.As such, these facilities typically carry the highest traffic volumes, experience the longest vehicle trips,and have the highest speed limits of all City streets. Direct access to adjacent land uses is permitted, although these streets are most likely to have limited access,in an effort to enhance safety along these corridors,and increase capacity for through vehicles. These arterials are the framework street system for the City and usually extend beyond the City limits, connecting with neighboring jurisdictions.They are typically constructed to accommodate five-lanes of traffic with speed limits of 30 to 45 mph. The design year average daily traffic (ADT) is greater than 15,000 vehicles per day. Principal arterials are heavily utilized as bus routes, carrying both local and regional service. Typically, on-street bicycle facilities are not appropriate for Principal Arterials and bicyclists are accommodated on adjacent separated trails or on parallel bicycle routes. Pedestrians are • accommodated on sidewalks. Minor Arterials interconnect and augment the principal arterial system by providing access to and from the principal arterials and freeways. They serve moderate length trips with slightly less mobility than principal arterials and distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas. Minor arterials may serve secondary traffic generators such as business centers, neighborhood shopping centers, major parks, multifamily residential areas, medical centers, larger religious institutions, and community activity centers. While minor arterials should not enter neighborhoods, they do provide access between neighborhoods. They are typically constructed to accommodate four to five lanes of traffic with speed limits of 30 to 35 mph and a design year ADT of 10,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. Minor arterials are frequently urili7ed as bus routes, have sidewalks to comfortably accommodate pedestrians and may include bicycle lanes, as appropriate. COLLECTORS Collectors are a step below arterials in the City classification system. There are three types of collectors in Auburn. Urban Residential Collectors are used to connect local streets and residential neighborhoods to community activity centers and minor and principal arterials. Urban Residential Collectors are typically constructed to accommodate two travel lanes with medians and turn pockets at intersections or two travel lanes with bicycle lanes. The posted speed limit is generally 30 mph and the design year ADT is 2,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day. Urban Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for some transit service,including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services. Chapter 2. The Street System Peke 2- 2 ORD.E Page 202 of 751 AüBU .i4si Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON ill, _,.; ; Rustic Residential Collectors are routes located in areas with less intensive land uses associated with g' the Residential Conservancy land-use designation. 4 They carry traffic between local and arterial streets. Rustic Residential Collectors provide access to all - -...;:-` • , levels of arterials, are typically constructed to accommodate two lanes with gravel shoulders on ' _ both sides, and have a speed limit of 30 to 40 mph. The gravel shoulder may be reduced on one side to provide a wider shoulder on the other for equestrian access or bicycle travel. Rustic Residential Collectors Residential Collector, Urban do not have sidewalks and generally do not carry transit services except for paratransit and possibly dial-a-ride-transit.The design year ADT is 1,000 to 5,000 vehicles per day. Non-Residential Collectors provide intra-community access by connecting non-residential areas such as industrial and commercial areas to minor and principal arterials. They may serve neighborhood traffic generators such as stores, elementary schools, religious institutions, clubhouses, small hospitals or clinics, areas of small multifamily developments, as well as other commercial and industrial uses. Non-Residential Collectors are typically constructed to accommodate two lanes and a center two-way left-turn lane, with a speed limit of 30 mph and may include bicycle lanes. The design year ADT is 2,500 to 5,000 vehicles per day. Non-Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for some transit service,including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services. LOCAL STREETS Local Streets are the most common street type in the City. Local streets comprise all facilities not part of one of the higher classification systems. Local streets primarily provide direct access to abutting land and to the higher order streets. Service to through traffic is discouraged. There are four categories of local streets. Urban Local Residential Streets provide access to abutting residential parcels. They offer the lowest level of mobility among all street classifications. The street is designed to conduct traffic between dwelling units and higher order streets. As the lowest order street in the hierarchy, the street usually carries minimal through traffic and includes short streets, cul-de-sacs, and courts. The speed limit is generally 25 mph and the design year ADT is 200 to 1,200 vehicles per day. Urban Local Residential Streets have sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians. Bicyclists may travel either on the sidewalk or within the travel lane depending on their level of comfort. Transit service is generally limited to dial-a- ride transit and paratransit. Rustic Local Residential Streets serve areas associated with the Residential Conservancy zoning designation. They provide access to adjacent land and distributing traffic to and from the arterials, residential collectors, rustic, and local streets. Rustic Local Residential Streets are two-lane roadways with gravel shoulders and a speed limit of 25 mph. The design year ADT is 100 to 1,000 vehicles per day. Because these streets have low traffic volumes, bicyclists can comfortably share the travel lane with motorized vehicles. Since Rustic Local Residential Streets do not have sidewalks,pedestrians walk Chapter 2. The.Street System Age 2-3 ORD.E Page 203 of 751 CITY Y'BURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON along the shoulder of the road. Transit service is very infrequent and most likely limited to paratransit and possibly dial-a-ride-transit. Local Non-Residential Streets provide direct access to higher order classification streets and serve primarily industrial and manufacturing land uses. They offer a lower level of mobility and accommodate heavy vehicle traffic. Typically they have two travel lanes with a speed limit of 25 mph and the design year ADT is 400 to 1,200 vehicles per day. Local Non-Residential Streets have sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists may travel on the shoulder of the road (Class IV bicycle facility), although bicycle travel may not be as comfortable as on Local Residential Streets due to a greater frequency of trucks and other heavy vehicles. Transit service is generally limited to dial-a- ride transit and paratransit. Private Streets can be appropriate for local access in very limited usage. They provide direct access to City streets and should be limited to those streets accessing properties within a planned area and immediately adjacent properties. Private streets at a minimum are built to the same design and construction standards as a local residential street. ALLEYS AND ACCESS TRACTS Alleys provide vehicular access to abutting properties, generally through the rear or side of the property. Alleys can be public or private and serve several purposes including access management and the alleviation of traffic problems on city streets. Alleys should provide through access to city streets or adequate turnaround space if through access is not feasible. Alleys shall be constructed to allow for general-purpose and emergency access at all times. • Access Tracts, sometimes referred to as shared driveways, provide vehicular access for lots that do not abut a street or alley. They are most common in panhandle lots or rear lots that do not have street or alley access. Access tracts are privately owned and maintained. They must provide for sufficient vehicular movement and turnaround space, be free of temporary and permanent obstructions, and provide for emergency access. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Average daily traffic counts were obtained from data collected during 2013. Map 2-2 shows the existing average weekday daily traffic volumes on City arterials. A major contributor to the high traffic volumes on City arterials is traffic passing through the City. This pass-through traffic originates in surrounding jurisdictions and uses City streets to access the major regional highways, such as SR-18 and SR-167. Between 25 and 30 percent of all vehicle trips on the Auburn street system begin and end outside the City. The City is committed to working with WSDOT to improve the state highway system, thereby reducing the demand on the City street system. SPEED LIMITS The City designates speed limits as a means of alerting drivers to safe and appropriate travel speeds for a particular corridor segment. Typically, the higher the classification of roadway, the higher the posted speed limit. Except for school zones which are posted at 20 mph when children are present, speed limits in the City range from 25 mph (typically for local roads) to 45 mph on some principal arterials. The City routinely monitors corridors to ensure appropriate speed limits are in place. Unless otherwise posted the statutory legal speed limit in the City is 25 mph. Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-4 ORD.E Page 204 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SIGNS Traffic signals, signs, and pavement markings are used to inform road users, thereby increasing the effective use of the roadway by moving traffic more efficiently and safely. The City uses the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as guidance for design, construction, and placement of these design elements in the right of way. FREIGHT Auburn is an important freight hub in the Puget Sound region, and the efficient movement of freight, through and within the City, is critical to Auburn's economic stability. Both rail and truck freight, originating largely in the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle,pass through Auburn regularly. RAIL The Union Pacific Railroad (UP) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) have rail lines running through Auburn. The UP line runs north-south, to the east of the Interurban Trail. BNSF has a double-track, federally designated, high-speed railroad line running north-south. BNSF and Sound Transit are planning to add a third track to this north-south line by 2016. This third track is being installed to handle increased commuter rail traffic and freight traffic.The BNSF Stampede Pass line runs east-west through downtown Auburn, entering Auburn at the east end of town near Auburn- Black Diamond Road and merging with the north-south line just south of the Auburn Station. In addition, BNSF operates a rail yard between A Street SE and C Street SW, south of SR-18. In the future, this area may develop as a multi-modal rail yard,prompting the need to mitigate increased truck traffic through capacity improvements. BNSF also has plans to increase traffic on the Stampede Pass line, the east-west rail line running through Auburn. To accommodate this increase the City recently completed the grade separation of M Street SE. Both the BNSF north-south line and the Stampede Pass line are handling an increase in rail freight traffic. BNSF handles a number of unit (solid) coal trains traveling to terminals in northwest Washington state as well as unit oil trains carrying crude oil to northwest Washington state refineries. While loaded coal and oil trains are usually handled on the .north-south line, some of these empty trains return east to Wyoming or North Dakota via the Stampede Pass line. The pavement at the crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad at 15th Street SW is in very poor condition. Rehabilitation of the pavement is a high priority for the City, and a project has been programmed to reconstruct 15th Street SW from C Street SW to the railroad tracks. TRUCK The City has designated truck routes for through freight movement in an effort to maximize the efficiency of and protect the roadway infrastructure. Current City of Auburn truck routes are shown in Map 2-3. Truck routes, established by City ordinance, are designated for roadways that incorporate special design considerations such as street grades, continuity, turning radii, street and lane widths, pavement strength, and overhead obstruction heights. In addition, the Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) is used to classify roadways, freight railroads and waterways according to the annual freight tonnage they carry as directed by RCW 47.05.021. Map 2-4 shows the 2013 classifications of City streets. The FGTS is primarily used to establish funding eligibility for Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2- ORD.E Page 205 of 751 CITY or - Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • grants, fulfill federal reporting requirements, support transportation planning process, and plan for pavement needs and upgrades.The FGTS classifies roadways using the following categories: • T1: more than 10 million tons per year • T2:4 million to 10 million tons per year • T3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year • T4: 100,000 to 300,000 tons per year • T5: at least 20,000 tons in 60 days and less than 100,000 tons per year Truck freight tonnage values are derived from actual or estimated truck traffic counts and converted into average weights by truck type. The City expects that the majority of regional truck trips will take place on state highways. However, recognizing that trips through the City are sometimes necessary, Auburn has designated a network of north-south and east-west corridors as truck routes,which are built to truck standards. In addition, the City has designated future truck routes, which will be designed and constructed to accommodate truck traffic, as opportunities arise. FMSIB has expressed an interest in these first and last mile connectors which provide access between these classified freight facilities and port, rail yard, distribution centers and truck terminals. Auburn has significant industrial and commercial development throughout the City. The City encourages local delivery trucks to use the designated truck network as much as possible, but • recognizes that trips on non-truck routes are necessary. The City is committed to supporting local industry, business, and residential needs and recognizes that the ability to ship and receive freight is essential to the success of many businesses. To implement this policy, the City will collaborate with local businesses to improve freight access, while maintaining the roadway infrastructure, whenever possible. This may include adopting City Code and updating the Auburn Engineering Design and Construction Standards in a manner that favors these priorities. However, in a limited number of key locations, trucks may be prohibited due to existing design elements which do not support trucks, protecting sensitive areas such as downtown and residential neighborhoods, and to extend pavement life. SAFETY The City places the highest priority on providing a safe transportation system for all travel modes. 110 Continual efforts are made to make changes to the ._�•• = w street system in a manner that improves safety and decreases the likelihood and severity of collisions. Pedestrian crossings and other non-motorized safety issues are discussed in the following chapters. At grade railroad crossings, emergency response needs and collisions related to the street system are discussed below. At Grade Railroad Crossings Truck Traffic Using S 277th Street • Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-6 ORD.E Page 206 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WAS H I N GTO N At grade railroad crossings create conflict points between vehicles and non-motorized road users and rail traffic. Auburn has several at grade railroad crossings: the Union Pacific tracks cross 44th St NW, 37th Street NW, 29th Street NW,West Main Street, and 15th Street SW. The BNSF tracks cross 37th Street NW,29th Street NW, 3rd Street NW,W Main Street,and Auburn-Black Diamond Road. With more than 60 trains passing through the City each day,the City has many at grade crossings,each with unique safety implications. The City coordinates with railroad operators and the State to upgrade the crossings whenever possible. For instance, the project to grade separate M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks by lowering M Street SE under the railroad overpass was completed during 2013. Recent upgrades include the construction of a pre-signal where 37th Street NW crosses the BNSF tracks, to stop westbound vehicles on 37th Street NW to the west of the grade crossing in advance of the traffic signal at B Street NE.The pre-signal will prevent vehicles from stopping on the crossing. BNSF is currently constructing a third rail mainline between Seattle and Auburn to improve service and reliability for passenger rail. The new mainline is located on the west-side of the existing tracks. The third mainline will reduce vehicle storage for westbound vehicles on W Main Street and 3rd Street NW between the tracks and traffic signals with C Street NW. The City is working with BNSF to upgrade the crossings to provide additional time to clear vehicles and pedestrians from these crossings before the gates come down. Impacts at the remaining grade crossings are anticipated to worsen in the future due to increased vehicle demands at the crossings, combined with increased rail traffic, resulting in more frequent, and longer duration,closures. EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND MANAGEMENT Providing residents with quick responses in emergency situations is a high priority for the City. The City maintains a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and supporting plans which ark identify critical facilities that should be maintained as a first priority during catastrophic events. Critical _ transportation facilities, generally include Principal • Arterials,bridges and major evacuation routes. In addition, the City works to provide a street network that will ensure multiple alternate routes for BNSF Freight Train at West Main Street emergency vehicles. Fire and police response vehicles are equipped with traffic signal controls that enable emergency vehicles to secure safe and rapid passage along signalized corridors. In addition, the City has mutual-aid agreements with nearby emergency response operators to ensure adequate coverage in case of road closures or other obstacles that would otherwise prevent timely emergency response. COLLISIONS The City collects and reviews collision data to identify intersection and roadway locations where potential hazards exist. Potential safety problems are identified using the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) methodology, an effective problem identification tool for evaluating locations with higher Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-7 ORD.E Page 207 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • collision histories. The SPIS score for a location considers three years of data and considers frequency, collision rate,and severity. If a hazard is identified, corrective measures can then be identified and implemented as appropriate. While the City relies primarily on its own data, collision data from other sources,including neighboring jurisdictions and the State,is utilized whenever available. 2.2 Street Standards and Levels-of-Service The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to establish service levels for the street network and to provide a means for correcting deficiencies and meeting future needs. Transportation professionals use the term level-of-service' (LOS) to measure the operational performance of a transportation facility, such as a street corridor or intersection. This measure considers perception by motorists and passengers in terms of speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions and delays,comfort, and convenience. The City currently uses a single-mode LOS system based upon vehicular travel. In the future, a multi- modal system which includes transit,pedestrians, and bicyclists should be developed and adopted. The currently adopted LOS methodology gives letter designations from 'A' through 'F', with LOS A representing the best operating conditions, and LOS F representing the worst. LOS can be quantified in different terms, depending on the transportation facility. Definitions for each level-of-service and the methodologies for calculating the level-of-service for various facilities are contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000). The City most commonly uses corridor level-of- service for accessing facilities. Generally, this is considered the most comprehensive way to determine vehicular traffic impacts. The following descriptions provide some guidance for interpreting the meaning of each LOS letter for corridor LOS on city streets. • LOS A describes primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed (FFS) for the given street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. FFS is the average speed of vehicles on a given facility, measured under low-volume conditions, when drivers tend to drive at their desired speed and are not constrained by control delay. Control delay is the total elapse time from a vehicle joining the queue until its departure from the stopped position at the head of the queue. This includes the time required to decelerate into the queue and accelerate back to free-flow speed. • LOS B describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the FFS for the street class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant. • LOS C describes stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the FFS for the street class. • LOS D borders on the range in which small increases in the number of vehicles may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to poor progression through the signalized intersections along a corridor, inappropriate signal timing,high Chapter 2. The Street System Prlge 2-8 ORD.E Page 208 of 751 �►�Y��� Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASH I NGTON traffic volumes, or a combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of FFS. • LOS E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of 33 percent or less or the FFS. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse signal progression, close signal spacing,high volumes,extensive delays at critical intersections,and inappropriate signal timing. • LOS F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one- fourth of the FFS. Intersection congestion is likely critical at signalized locations,with high delays, high volumes,and extensive queuing. CITY LOS STANDARDS AND CURRENT LOS It is necessary to define LOS standards for transportation facilities to enforce the concurrency requirements of the GMA. If development causes a facility to degrade below a defined LOS standard, concurrency requires that the development make improvement to restore operations to the LOS standard or better,or the permit for that development be denied. Auburn defines unsatisfactory LOS as: an unacceptable increase in hazard or unacceptable decrease in safety on a roadway; an accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements that can reasonably result in accelerated deterioration of the street pavement (typically addressed through the payment of the truck impact fee);an unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an intersection where two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector network; an increase in congestion which constitutes an unacceptable adverse environmental impact under the State Environmental Policy Act; or the inability of a facility to meet the adopted LOS standard. The City uses corridor LOS as its primary measurement of transportation system impacts. The City corridors typically used for analyzing LOS are shown in Map 2-5, although the City may require analysis of a different segment in order to assess the full LOS impacts. All arterials and collectors in Auburn have designated LOS standards. The LOS standard for these corridors is primarily LOS D with the exception of some corridors that may operate as LOS E or F, with a specified maximum travel time. While the City uses a weekday PM peak hour based LOS system,weekday AM peak hour LOS impacts may be required to be analyzed in situations where unique conditions are likely to result in a LOS deficiency during the weekday AM peak hour. Table 2-1 identifies Auburn's LOS Standards, as well as the 2014 corridor LOS. As indicated in the table, LOS was calculated for many of Auburn's street corridors using traffic count data collected during 2014. Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-9 ORD.E Page 209 of 751 CITyor Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • Table 2-1 Corridor Level of Service—ExistingWeekday 2014 PM Peak Hour LOS 2014 LOS ID Corridor From To Standard* NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St D C C 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE D C D 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr SE D B C 5 M St/Harvey Auburn Way N E Main St E D _ D 6 M St/Harvey E Main St Auburn Way S D D C 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N D C C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** D D 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D B C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW D D D 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D B C 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B B 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th PI SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D A C 26 Lakeland Hills Wy SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE D D C 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr A St SE Auburn Way S D D C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S E F E • 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE E F F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D E " Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan.All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. " Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. As shown in the table, each of the corridor segments currently meets LOS standards except for eastbound Cross Street and both eastbound and westbound 41st Street SE, all of which currently operate at LOS F.The poor operations on these segments can be attributed to their short length, closely spaced signalized intersections,and limited storage lengths,combined with high volumes of turning traffic. In the majority of cases it is the traffic operations at the intersections along a corridor which limit the capacity of the corridor,rather than the capacity of the roadway segments between intersections.This is especially true along corridors with closely spaced intersections,such as Cross Street and 41st Street SE, and corridors where two principal arterial roads intersect, such as Auburn Way S and M Street SE. Along other corridors where the number of intersections is limited and the distances between them are greater,the corridor LOS may not identify a bottleneck at one or more of the intersections along the overall corridor. An example of this is along the Kersey Way corridor,where the overall corridor operates at LOS B,but the intersection with 29th Street SE operates at LOS D,with the highest delays and longest vehicle queue associated with southbound traffic on Kersey Way. • Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-10 ORD.E Page 210 of 751 • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON STATE HIGHWAY LOS Amendments to the GMA in 1998 added new requirements for local jurisdictions to address state- owned transportation facilities, as well as local transportation system needs in their comprehensive plans (RCW 47.06.140). House Bill 1487, adopted by the Washington State Legislature in 1998, requires that the transportation element of local comprehensive plans include the LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS). HB 1487 clarified that the concurrency requirement of the GMA does not apply to HSS or other transportation facilities and services of statewide significance. HB 1487 also requires local jurisdictions to estimate traffic impacts to state-owned facilities resulting from land use assumptions in the Comprehensive Plan. THE WSDOT STANDARD WSDOT has identified a LOS D standard for all urban Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) according to the State Highway System Plan (HSP). All state highways within the City of Auburn, including SR-18, SR-167, and SR-164 are classified as urban Highways of Statewide Significance, and therefore have a LOS D standard. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP Land use and the transportation system are intertwined, each influencing the development of the other. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate how the future transportation system can be improved to best support both existing and proposed land-uses. In 2003 Auburn was designated as a Regional Growth Center by the Puget Sound Regional Council as part of the Vision 2040 plan. Designated regional growth centers are identified for housing and employment growth,as well as being eligible for regional transportation funding. A broad overview of Auburn's Comprehensive Plan land use map's more intensive land use designations shows industrial (light and heavy) designations in the west side of the valley floor portion of the City, extensive commercial development (light and heavy) located along Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, and A Street SE, and sizable heavy commercial designated areas near the SR-18 and 15th Street SW interchange (The Outlet Collection) and between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW (Emerald Downs). Downtown Auburn is near the geographic center of the City, located generally east of the Interurban Trail,north of SR-18,west of F Street SE/NE,and south of 3rd Street NW/NE and 4th Street NE. Residential development generally exists along the east side of the valley floor and the surrounding hillsides of West Hill,Lea Hill, and Lakeland Hills. A major land use activity in Lea Hill to the east includes the Green River College located on SE 320th Street. As with many cities in South King and North Pierce counties, especially those along the SR-167 corridor, the local land use plan is characterized by a predominance of industrial land use designations. The land use element identifies "Industrialas the City's second most predominant zoning designation (residential being first). Consequently, the City's land use plan establishes a development pattern that has traffic generated by these industrial uses directed towards the State Highway System. Another key feature in the Comprehensive Plan land use element is a "Heavy Commercial" designation at 15th Street SW, adjacent to SR-167 and SR-18. This commercial designation is the site of The Outlet Collection.The Outlet Collection attracts customers on a regional basis and impacts use of the State Highway System, even more than the downtown, or the commercial development along Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2- I I ORD.E Page 211 of 751 CITY orComprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Auburn Way and A Street SE. The same can also be said for Auburn Way N to the north of downtown which serves as an automall,which attracts both local and regional traffic. Downtown Auburn contains a mix of land-uses including residential,commercial and industrial uses. Commercial uses in the Downtown are focused along Main Street,Auburn Way and A Street SE and tend to serve more local needs. Historically,this commercial development has served predominantly local needs. However, the presence of the Auburn Station, Multi Care,City Hall,and recent and proposed new development projects,combined with regulations and policies that encourage transit oriented developments,downtown commercial development will serve a broader range of needs in the future. Downtown Auburn also has the Cities most robust non-motorized infrastructure,including both extensive pedestrian and bicycle facilities.This provides the opportunity for both residents and employees to rely on proximate transit services at the Auburn Station,combined with a robust non- motorized transportation system for a portion of their transportation needs. The goal of this plan is to continue to grow and expand the non-motorized transportation system to provide the same transportation choices throughout the City. The City's Comprehensive Plan land use map focuses residential development in the eastern portion of the valley and in the West Hill, Lea Hill, and the Lakeland Hills area. Access to the State Highway System in Lea Hill is limited to SR-18 at SE 304th Street. Future impacts on the State Highway System in the Lea Hill area will primarily be commuter traffic due to the predominance of residential compre- hensive plan designations in that area, and continued growth of Green River College. The development of Lakeland Hills will also principally result in increased commuter traffic. Future impacts to the State Highway System can generally be gauged by projected arterial link ADT S volumes at or near state highway ramps. This is, at best, only a general estimate since not all traffic passing through these street segments is utilizing the State Highway System. Further, traffic using the arterial segment may be originating from outside Auburn, and may therefore not result from assumptions in Auburn's land use plan. Several city arterials connect directly to SR-167 and SR-18. Some examples include C Street SW, West Valley Highway, and Auburn Way South connections with SR-18, and 15th Street NW and 15th Street SW connections with SR-167. These streets are among the most heavily used in the City, a function of their relationship to the State Highway System. SR-164 is also within the city limits. Year 2013 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along SR-164 range from a low of 21,700 near the eastern city boundary up to 35,900 along Auburn Way South near SR-18.These volumes are forecast to continue to increase over the next 20 years. However, the growth is limited by the capacity of the roadway. The State Highway System also impacts the City's local street system. A "pass-through" traffic pattern results in significant traffic volume increases on the local arterial street system. For example, many of Auburn's weekday PM peak hour trips are work to home trips originating outside of the Auburn area and destined for residential areas outside of Auburn, including Pierce County and the Enumclaw Plateau. This traffic exits state routes and travels through Auburn to avoid congestion on the State Highway System. This is evidenced by increases in traffic counts within the City that clearly exceed that which might be expected through anticipated growth and development patterns outlined in the City's land use plan, such as at SR-164 at the eastern City limit.The City may implement measures that encourage local traffic movements and discourage pass-through trips. 110 Chapter 2. The Sheet System Page 2- 12 ORD.E Page 212 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AU BURN • WASHINGTON 2.3 Future Street System METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING FUTURE SYSTEM TRAVEL FORECASTS HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH ;Auburn has grown rapidly during the past decade, and housing and employment are expected to continue to increase significantly by 2035, with the population reaching approximately 95,000 residents, as shown in Figure 2-1. Much of the housing growth will come from higher density re- development in the downtown area and the rapidly growing Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas. Figure 2-1. Population, Housing, and Job Growth FOR CITY OF AUBURN 2000—2035 100,000 —• - - 90,000 80,000 -- 70,000 0,000 5 50,000 40,000 - - • 30,000 •- -- 20,000 10,000 0 2000 2010 2025 2035 LPopulation El-lousing Units oJobs 1—Population and housing data for 2000 and 2010 taken from US Census. 2—Population and housing projection for 2025 and 2035 from City of Auburn 3—Covered employment data and estimates derived from PSRC. • Chapter 2. The Slrrel System Pace 13 ORD.E Page 213 of 751 i IPi'°( Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • TRAFFIC GROWTH The City of Auburn relies on traffic forecasts using the VISUM travel demand model, which is based upon the land use plan and assumptions found in the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan. Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) household and employment forecasts are also used. The model is calibrated to include existing land uses and local knowledge,including large traffic generators such as Boeing, the Outlet Collection, Emerald Downs,Muckleshoot Casino,and White River Amphitheater. Areas outside of the current city limits that are expected to significantly impact the City transportation system are included in the model. The model enables the City to conduct traffic forecasts for all arterial and collector streets based upon a number of if-then development and land use scenarios. The more dramatic traffic increases are often caused by development outside the City,especially along the roadways serving the Enumclaw Plateau. Other areas of major traffic increase include A Street SE, M Street SE,and the West Valley Highway. In order to address the growing traffic volumes and congestion levels on city streets, traffic operations were evaluated for a near term horizon year of 2022 and a long term horizon year of 2035. This approach was taken to help identify which improvement projects need to be included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to accommodate short term growth, vs. those longer term projects which are needed to accommodate additional growth forecast to occur between 2022 and 2035. FUTURE 2022 CONDITIONS City Projects • The current Transportation Improvement Program, adopted during 2015, identifies programmed projects for the years 2016 to 2021. Therefore, the analysis of 2022 traffic operations includes City projects which would increase capacity along both roadway segments and at intersections which are anticipated to be constructed by 2022. The included projects are listed in Table 2-2 and illustrated on Map 2-6. This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is not included in the travel demand model: a new crossing of the BNSF Rail yard between SR-18 and 41st Street SE (TIP #12). This is discussed in more detail in the Future System Recommendations section of this chapter and may be included in future updates to this plan. Regional Transportation Projects In addition to the City of Auburn projects identified above, a number of regional transportation projects are planned to be completed, predominantly WSDOT projects planned for the freeway system. However,none of these projects are anticipated to be completed by 2022. Additional Projects In addition to the projects identified in Map 2-6, four intersections outside of the City were identified as potential level-of-service concerns during the plan development. While the following intersections have not been analyzed in detail because they are situated outside of Auburn's jurisdiction, they should be evaluated by the appropriate jurisdiction and programmed for improvements as needed: • 51st Avenue S/S 316th Street(King County) • S 321st Street/46th Place (King County) • Chapter 2. Me Street System Pere 2- 14 ORD.E Page 214 of 751 cITY01 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • S 321st Street/Peasley Canyon Road (King County) • West Valley Hwy/Peasley Canyon Rd (WSDOT) As mitigation for an adjacent development project located within the City of Auburn, the eastbound stop-controlled S 316th Street approach to 51st Avenue S is being widened to provide separate left- and right-turn lanes. This improvement was required to mitigate a development related impact to LOS at this intersection. The same development project also identified a traffic operations impact at the S 321st Street intersection with 46th Place S. As mitigation for that impact the development dedicated ROW to the City to allow the 46th Place S approach to S 321st Street to be realigned to the east to create two offset "T" intersections. This project is included in the City of Auburn TIP (TIP #9) and included in Table 2-2 below. Chapter 2. The Street System Poke 2- 15 ORD.E Page 215 of 751 t Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN bV>I IIN(;ION • Table 2-2. Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimates —2022 Map Location Description Total Cost No. (corridor and segment) (2015 dollars) City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis 1 Auburn Way S Widen to 5-lanes, pedestrian Dogwood St SE to Fir St SE improvements, and access control $1,739,163 I Street NE Corridor 2 45th St NE to S 277th St Construct 5 lane arterial $6,763,892 3 S 277th Street Widen to 5 lanes total and install a AWN to Green River Bridge Class 1 trail $8,293,101 4 A Street NW Phase 2 Construct multi-lane arterial $3,150,000 W Main St to 3rd St NW 5 F Street SE Add a center turn lane and non- 4th St SE to Auburn Way S motorized improvements $2,457,620 M Street NE 6 E Main St to 4th St NE Widen to 4 lanes $1,525,000 7 8th Street NE Add EB lane to south side of 8th Pike St NE to R St NE Street NE $1,450,000 8 49th Street NE Construct multi-lane arterial $3,350,000 Auburn Way N to I St NE connection 9 46th Place S Realignment Realign 46th Place S to the east to S 321st St and 46th PI S create two new T intersections $825,000 10 124th Ave SE Corridor Widen to 4 lanes and bike lanes $4,000,000 SE 318th St to SE 312th St SE 320th Street 11 116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave Roundabout at 116th Avenue SE $4,644,100 SE and safety improvements Auburn Way S Additional turn lanes and vehicle 12 Muckleshoot Plaza to storage, access control, and non- $2,892,550 Dogwood St SE motorized improvements. • (halve,.2. 1 be,1'l,t'e!.1')rlrvi Page 2- 16 ORD.E Page 216 of 751 MY Of Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis(Continued) W Valley Highway Roadway widening, re- 13 Improvements channelization, non-motorized $3,700,000 15th St NW to W Main St improvements and ITS upgrades 14 W Main Street Re-channelization, non-motorized $4,444,938 W Valley Hwy to Interurban Trail improvements, ITS upgrades 15 Auburn Way S Widen to 5-lanes, signalize $4,609,899 Fir St SE to Hemlock St SE Hemlock St SE 16 M Street SE Corridor Construct multi-lane corridor $6,675,000 8th St SE to Auburn Way S. Widen to 2 lanes each direction Lea Hill Road Segment 1 including widening of the Green 17 e. Includes bike lanes $13,030,000 River Bridge.R St NE to 105th PI SE 9 and sidewalks. 18 Lea Hill Road Segment 2 Widen to 2 lanes each direction. $12,000,000 105th PI SE to 112th Ave SE Includes bike lanes and sidewalks. 19 Lea Hill Road Segment 3 Widen to 2 lanes each direction. $4,000,000 112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE Includes bike lanes and sidewalks. 20 W Valley Highway Re-channelization, non-motorized $3,100,000 SR-18 to 15th St SW improvements, ITS upgrades 21 R Street SE Construct a new roadway $10,000,000 17th St SE to M St SE connection 22 M Street SE at 12th Street SE Install a new traffic signal $625,000 23 M Street SE at 29th Street SE Install a new traffic signal $450,000 C./. ,Ptrr 2. 1[rr-.S'tree!5V).rlrni Prt;e 2- 17 ORD.E Page 217 of 751 CITY OT Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis(Continued) 24 124th Avenue SE at SE 284th Safety and capacity improvements $700,000 Street Lake Tapps Parkway 25 Lakeland Hills Wy to E Valley Add ITS system $1,005,000 Hwy 26 29th Street SE at R street SE Increase intersection capacity $1,800,000 Install a traffic signal and 27 A Street SE at 37th Street SE southbound u-turn for future $934,500 access management 28 I Street NE at 22nd Street NE Construct a new roundabout $1,425,000 Subtotal for City Projects $109,589,763 • Non-City Projects included in the 2022 Analysis 51st Avenue S 288th Street Add signal 2022 LEVELS OF SERVICE Weekday PM peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2022 conditions using the same methodology used to calculate the 2014 levels of service shown previously. The same corridors were analyzed in both cases. The 2022 levels of service account for the growth forecast to occur between 2014 and 2022 and the capacity improvement projects identified above. The 2022 levels of service are shown in Table 2-3. Is should be noted that without the projects shown in Table 2-2, the traffic operations presented in Table 2-3 would be significantly worse, with additional corridors operating below adopted LOS standards. • Chapter 2. The Soret.System Page 2- 18 ORD.E Page 218 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Table 2-3. Corridor LOS—Future 2022 Weekday PM Peak Hour LOS 2022 LOS ID Corridor From To Standard' EB/NB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St D C D 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE D C E 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr SE D C C 5 M St/Harvey Rd Auburn Way N E Main St E D D 6 M St/Harvey Rd E Main St Auburn Way S D D D 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N D C C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** D D 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D C C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D C D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW D D D 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D B D 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B C 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th PI SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D B B 26 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE D D D 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr A St SE Auburn Way S D C C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S E E E 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE E F F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D C " Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better,unless otherwise indicated. "'Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. As shown in the table, all of the evaluated corridors would meet LOS standards in 2022 with the inclusion of the improvements identified above with the following exceptions: • Southbound Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE; • Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW;and • Westbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW. In order to be able to meet LOS standards on these corridor segments additional improvements beyond those already included in this analysis are required. A review of the segment of Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE shows that traffic operations through the SR-18 interchange and at the intersection with M St SE cause the overall corridor segment to degrade to LOS E. The interchange area is constrained by the existing SR-18 overpass, the configuration of the SR-18 on- and off-ramps, and the close spacing of the ramp intersections which provide limited vehicle storage. As a result the ability to increase capacity along this section of the corridor is limited. It is possible that the construction of the new eastbound off-ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot Casino could draw traffic away from this area; however the scope of this project has not yet been Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2. 19 ORD.E Page 219 of 751 AYuRN TYrComprehensive Transportation Plan B WASH INc.1ON • determined so it was not accounted for in this analysis. It may be also appropriate, as with certain other corridor sections, for the City to consider changing the LOS standard for this corridor to reflect that the existing corridor is built-out and further improvements are neither desirable nor cost effective. Similar circumstances exist for Corridor #33, 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road. This corridor is forecast to operate at LOS F in both the eastbound and westbound directions in 2022. This corridor is constrained by the BNSF bridge, the close spacing of the C Street SW and A Street SE signalized intersections, and the limited storage space between the two intersections. Providing additional capacity would likely require the BNSF bridge to be reconstructed, an expensive proposition, with a limited increase in capacity. It is possible that other capacity projects may reduce traffic volumes on this by constructing additional capacity on alternate routes. These include the crossing of the BNSF railyard to the north which would provide another east-west connection across southern Auburn, and the completion of the improvements to Stewart Road to the south, including the replacement of the White River bridge, which would provide additional capacity between SR-167 and the Lakeland Hills area. The BNSF railyard crossing project is included as project #12 in the TIP, however construction is shown beyond 2021, so this project was not included in the analysis of 2022 conditions. Completion of the Stewart Road capacity improvements are being planned by the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. The City of Auburn supports these improvements, and has programmed the project in the TIP as project #73, which will provide the City of Pacific with some funds to support construction of their portion of the project. Construction of these improvements is not anticipated until beyond 2022, so this was not accounted for in this analysis. Another potential option could be to revise the LOS standard for this corridor to reflect that the existing corridor is built-out and further improvements may not be cost effective. The transportation system can be compared to a three legged stool in terms of the improvement strategies which are available to reduce congestion. The three options are to construct improvements to add capacity, make better use of the existing infrastructure which is available, and to manage demand. The analysis presented above accounts for the construction of additional capacity, and making better use of the available capacity through expansion of ITS infrastructure and the optimization of signal timing. The analysis does not account for demand management strategies which could result in improvements to traffic operations through the use of such things as: • Road Pricing(Tolling) • Parking Management and Parking Pricing • Car Sharing • Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance • Ridesharing and HOV Lanes • Transit Incentives • Transit and non-motorized Improvements • Telecommute,compressed work week,off-peak schedule Many of these solutions have been implemented at the state level, with additional consideration being given to expanding the options which are currently in use. Decisions need to be made regarding how these three potential congestion management tools are balanced to provide the most cost effective solutions. It is unlikely that the City will be able to • Chapter 2. I he Street.S'yster Page 2-20 ORD.E Page 220 of 751 CITy., Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASH INCiTON implement all of the capacity projects documented above by 2022 due to the cost of the project portfolio being in excess of available funding. Therefore, the focus should be on the most cost effective projects which reduce congestion at locations where it is a recurrent problem, and improving the efficiency of the existing system. Transportation system management and transportation demand management are included in the future system recommendations section at the end of this chapter. FUTURE 2035 CONDITIONS City Projects In addition to the projects identified above which were included in the 2022 analysis, a number of additional projects were included in the analysis of 2035 conditions. These additional projects include those which are included in the TIP but which are not anticipated to be constructed until beyond 2022, and the longer term projects included in the previous Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The included projects are listed in Table 2-4 and illustrated on Map 2-6. This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is not included in the model: the crossing of the BNSF Rail yard. This is discussed in more detail in the Future System Recommendations section of this chapter and will likely be included in future model runs and updates to this plan. Regional Transportation Projects In addition to the City of Auburn projects identified above, a number of regional transportation projects were included in the development of the forecast volumes. These are predominantly WSDOT projects planned for the freeway system. Table 2-4 summarizes the included projects, along with planning level cost estimates. Additional Projects Another future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addition of the Auburn Bypass connecting SR-18 to SR-164. A draft Bypass Feasibility Report (September 2009) was prepared in partnership with WSDOT, the City of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional partners. While a preferred alternative for the bypass has not yet been developed,the Washington State Legislature included funding in the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of this new connection. It is anticipated that the new roadway will include an eastbound off-ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot Casino, no additional details regarding the project have been determined. Therefore, this was not accounted for in the traffic forecasts. The impacts of this project will be identified and mitigated as part of the process to determine the ultimate alignment.The project will be included in future updates of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Chapter 2. The Sheet System Page 2-2 ORD.E Page 221 of 751 AUBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan • Table 2-4. Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimates—2035 Map Location Description Total Cost No. (corridor and segment) (2015 dollars) Additional City Projects Included in the 2035 Analysis Widen road to two lanes each direction plus a center two- SR-164 way left turn lane. Upgrade 29 Hemlock St SE to Academy Dr the intersection of Auburn $61,000,000 SE Way South and Dogwood Street to accommodate Bypass traffic. 30 R Street Bypass Construct a new bypass road $6,200,000 M St SE to SR-18 Add NB right turn lane, EB S 312th Street right turn lane, WB left turn 31 112th Avenue SE lane, and signal. Provide $1,720,000 sidewalks and bike lanes on all legs. SE 304th Street Add signal and NB left turn 32 lane. Include sidewalks and $1,300,000 • 112th Avenue SE bike lanes both sides. Construct 500' section from SE 320th to SE 318th Way GRCC Improvements at 124th with three SB lanes and one 33 Ave SE NB lane. The southbound lanes will be two left turn into $510,000 SE 318th St to SE 320th St GRCC and one right turn onto SE 320th. Bike lanes and sidewalks included. Add one-way(EB) road with A Street Loop unsignalized free right turn at 34 A St SW to A St SE A Street SE. Include $1,700,000 sidewalks both sides of new road. Coordinate signals at A and C Street together. At A A Street SEX Street SW Street, add additional WB 35 through lane; At C Street, $1,500,000 Ellingson Road restripe to allow SB left turn lane. Include sidewalks on all legs of both intersections. • Chapter 2. The.Street J yuh m �,. 2-22 ORD.E Page 222 of 751 CI IY Of Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Additional City Projects Accounted for in the 2035 Analysis (continued) Construct new collector linking 284th Street at 124th 36 SE 284th I SE 288th St Ave.to 288th Street $7,700,000 124th Ave SE to 132nd Ave SE at 132nd Ave. Road will be one lane each direction with bike lanes and sidewalks. Provide protected SB left turn phase 37 51st Avenue and signal and SB $1,400,000 S 296th S left turn lane; Include bike lanes and sidewalks on all legs Realign / improve radius at doglegs (SE 281st St)for safety, and realign intersecting streets to improve site 108th Avenue/112th Avenue distances.Widen to 38 SE 4 lanes north of $7,700,000 S 277th St to S 286th St 284th Street. At 286th Street, widen to allow for turn pockets. Include bike lanes and sidewalk both sides of 108th/112th Ave SE. Subtotal for City Projects $90,730,000 Additional City Projects NOT Accounted for in the 2035 Analysis(continued) 39 BNSF Yard Grade Separation Construct road $32,125,000 TBD across BNSF yard Construct an Auburn Auburn Way S Bypass Way S Bypass 40 Riverwalk Dr to SR-18 at R St between Riverwalk $60,450,000 Dr and R St SE with SE new connection to SR-18 at R St SE Chapter 2. The Street J yctem Page 2-23 ORD.E Page 223 of 751 CITY orComprehensive Transportation Plan AuBURN WASH I NGTON • Non-City Projects included in the 2035 Analysis From 1-405 to SR-18, add one NB and one SB general purpose lane; From SR-18 to SR-161, add one NB HOT SR-167 lane and one SB HOT lane; Add direct NB/SB HOV/HOT lane connection ramps between SR-167 & 1-405; Add NB 1-405 to SR-509 and SB auxiliary lanes between 1-405 and S 180th Street; Add NB and SB auxiliary lanes between SR-516 and S 277th Street; Extend SR-167 from SR-161 to SR-509. Complete ramp from EB SR-18 to SB SR-167 and SR-18 at SR-167 eliminate SR-18 access from West Valley Highway near Peasley Canyon. SR-167 Add HOV lane each direction 15th Street NW to 8th Street E Stewart Road Widen to 2 lanes each direction and center turn lane in the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. Includes widening of the SR-167 to East Valley Highway White River bridge. 2035 LEVELS OF SERVICE • Weekday P\1 peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2035 conditions using the same methodology used to calculate both the 2014 and 2022 levels of service. The 2035 levels of service account for the growth forecast to occur by 2035 and the capacity improvement projects identified above. The 2035 levels of service are shown in Table 2-5. As shown in the table, all of the evaluated corridors would meet LOS standards in 2035 with the inclusion of the improvements identified above with the following exceptions: • Southbound Auburn Way N between S 277th St and 15th St NE; • Southbound Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE; • Northbound M St between E Main St and Auburn Way S; • Eastbound 37th St between W Valley Hwy and Auburn Way N; • Westbound 15th St SW between W Valley Hwy and A St SE; • Southbound Lakeland Hill Way SE between Lake Tapps Pkwy and A St SE; • Eastbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S; • Westbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S;and • Westbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE. The additional traffic anticipated by 2035 is expected to degrade a number of additional corridors below adopted level of service standards relative to the analysis of 2022 conditions. 41111 Chapter 2. The Street.System Page 2-24 ORD.E Page 224 of 751 CITY OF ' Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON There are two locations where corridors would operate at improvement levels of service in 2035 relative to 2022 conditions: • Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE,which would improve from LOS F to LOS E, the result of the improvements identified above, combined with the planned improvements to the Stewart Road corridor and SR-167 which would attract traffic currently using the 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road corridor to access A Street/East Valley Highway to the south. • Southbound West Valley Highway between 15th Street NW and 15th Street SW,which would improve from LOS D to LOS C. This is also likely due to improvements to SR-167, which would reduce the use of West Valley Highway as a parallel bypass route. Table 2-5. Corridor Levels of Service - Future 2035 Weekday PM Peak Hour LOS 2035 LOS ID Corridor From To Standard* NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St D D E 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE D C F 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr SE D D C 5 M St/Harvey Rd Auburn Way N E Main St E D E 6 M St E Main St Auburn Way S D E D 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N D E C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** E E 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D C C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW D D E 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D C D 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E E C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B C 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C C 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th PI SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D C C 26 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE D D E 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr A St SE Auburn Way S 0 C C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S E F F 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE E E F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E C C * Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better,unless otherwise indicated. **Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. In order to be able to meet LOS standards on these corridor segments additional improvements beyond those already included in this analysis may be required. However, it may not be cost effective to construct the additional capacity needed along all of these corridor segments. However, it may be Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-25 ORD.E Page 225 of 751 CITY Of Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN • WA.SHINt,ION possible to improve traffic operations at keyintersections along these corridors to reduce congestion. �' g However, these improvements may not be sufficient to improve operations to below adopted LOS standards. The City, and the broader region, will need to identify strategies and adopt policies, including transportation demand management, transportation system management, and public-private partnerships, to be able to manage congestion while reaching projected growth targets. FUTURE SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS The proposed future street plan consists of a -w combination of city street and regional *"" transportation improvements, described in Table 2- 3 and shown in Map 2-6. The City cannot i I adequately solve traffic congestion by making City West Main Street, Downtown Auburn street improvements alone. Partnerships with WSDOT, King and Pierce Counties, and other agencies are essential to implementing the future street system in Auburn. The following actions are proposed: 1. Implement street projects prioritized in the City's TIP and CFP; • 2. Program and seek additional funding for street capacity projects not currently identified in the TIP and CFP; 3. Work collaboratively with WSDOT and other partner agencies to implement roadway improvements to the regional highway network;and 4. Work to implement TSM,TDM and non-motorized improvements. DOWNTOWN CIRCULATION PLAN Auburn's Downtown is undergoing considerable growth and transition to a higher density, mixed-use town center. Major redevelopment, including the Trek Building and Merrill Gardens mixed-use projects is occurring to the south of Main Street. The transformation of downtown Auburn will include many changes to the public right-of-way and streetscape. The Downtown Circulation Plan will accommodate the many types of travelers that will be using downtown streets including pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, truck operators, and personal vehicle users. An improved pedestrian and bicycle environment will need to be designed into the fabric of downtown Auburn. At the same time,there are several major north-south corridors which traverse the downtown, so accommodation for high traffic volumes and the potential repercussions of modifying the existing street system will need to be considered in the development of the Downtown Circulation Plan. 411 Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-26 ORD.E Page 226 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL PARK DISTRICT In the vicinity of the Environmental Park, to the west of downtown Auburn, the City is evaluating the use of low impact roads and projects that add sidewalks, trails, and additional connectivity between Clay Street and Western Avenue. This area will be examined in more detail for transportation improvements as the concept for the Environmental Park District is further refined. 41ST STREET SE/ELLINGSON ROAD BETWEEN A ST SE AND C ST SW The area around 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road between A Street SE and C Street SW continues to be a bottleneck for Auburn drivers,especially with additional development in the Lakeland Hills PUD and the Pierce County cities to the south. The close spacing of these two intersections, coupled with the numerous business and residential accesses in the area warrant a more in depth study of the area. This study will likely also include the entire A Street SE and C Street SW corridors, and an evaluation of the BNSF rail yard crossing projects discussed below. BNSF RAIL YARD CROSSING The City has identified the need for a new east/west grade separated crossing of the BNSF rail yard between C Street SW and A Street NE. There are a variety of criteria that the City will consider to determine the alignment of the crossing, including potential development of the BNSF property as a multi-modal rail yard, commercial development on Auburn Way S and A Street SE, re-development of the GSA property, funding feasibility, neighborhood impacts, transportation impacts, and engineering feasibility. The crossing project was not accounted for in the 2035 traffic model. Therefore, it is difficult to access the specific impacts of the crossing project. However, it is anticipated that the project could significantly improve east-west mobility in southern Auburn, relieving the existing bottlenecks at 3rd Street SE and 41st Street SE,by providing an additional alternative for the residential neighborhoods to the east of the rail yard to connect with the commercial and retail land-uses and SR-167 to the west of the yard. One potential impact of the crossing project, depending on the alignment selected, could be an increase in traffic through the Terminal Park neighborhood. AUBURN BYPASS Another future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addition of the Auburn Bypass connecting SR-18 to SR-164. A draft Bj ass Feasibility Report (September 2009) was prepared in partnership with WSDOT, the City of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional partners.While a preferred alternative for the bypass has not yet been developed,the Washington State Legislature included funding in the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of a portion of this new connection. It is anticipated that the new roadway will include an eastbound off- ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot Casino, no additional details regarding the project have been determined. Therefore, this was not accounted for in the traffic forecasts. The impacts of this project will be identified and mitigated as part of the process to determine the ultimate alignment.The project will be included in future updates of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT Transportation system management (TSM) techniques, which make more efficient use of the existing transportation facilities, can reduce the need for costly system capacity expansion projects. These Chapter 2. The Street System Page 2-27 ORD.E Page 227 of 751 CUTY�f Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WAST I INGTON • techniques can also be used to improve LOS when travel corridors reach adopted LOS standards. P p TSM techniques used by the City include: • Re-channelization/restriping,adding turn lanes,adding/increasing number of through lanes; • Signal interconnect and optimization; • Turn movement restrictions; • Access Management;and • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The City will continue to use these TSM techniques to maximize the efficiency of the existing street network. Of the various TSM strategies available, the City continues to invest in and expand its ITS infrastructure as a cost effective means of increasing system capacity. The ITS system enables the City to change traffic signals in real-time, thereby accommodating unexpected increases in traffic or traffic obstacles such as event related traffic and collisions. For example, ITS has proven to be a useful tool in helping to manage the impact of event traffic traveling south on Auburn Way South, often during the PM peak, to the White River Amphitheatre. The City will continue to roll out ITS capabilities on corridors around the City, as referenced in Map 2-7 and detailed in the ITS policies included in Chapter 5. In addition to TSM strategies, the City strives to provide viable alternatives for travelers, to ensure freedom of choice among several transportation modes, including transit, biking and walking as alternatives to the automobile. The City will prioritize the development of pedestrian-friendly environments such as bicycle routes and pedestrian paths as the non-motorized system expands. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Reducing congestion includes strategies to reduce demands on the transportation system. The State of Washington emphasized the importance of transportation demand management (TDM) by adopting a Commute Trip Reduction law. That law requires all major employers, with over 100 employees arriving between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 AM, to develop programs and strategies to reduce the number of commuter automobile trips made by their employees. Transportation demand management reduces demand on the street system. While TDM and TSM employ a different suite of strategies,they share many of the same benefits. Both increase the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce the need for costly capacity expansions, help improve LOS, and contribute to an enhanced quality of life for those who use and benefit from the transportation system. TDM strategies include: • ride-sharing through vanpools and carpools; • preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles; • car sharing programs; • transit use incentives; • parking management to discourage single occupant vehicle (SOV) travel; • telecommuting; • alternative work schedules to compress the work week or shift the commute outside the typical commute hours; and • urban design encouraging non-motorized travel through design features. Chapter 2. The.S'treet System Page 2-28 ORD.E Page 228 of 751 • C1TY(�� Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASH]NGTON The City of Auburn will continue to encourage drivers of single occupancy vehicles to consider alternate modes of travel such as carpools, vanpools, transit, non-motorized travel, and alternative work schedules. STREET MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION The City is responsible for maintaining the physical structure of the roadway system. However, pavement maintenance is expensive, and adequate funding is generally not available. Recognizing this dilemma, Auburn residents approved Proposition 1, the "Save Our Streets" (SOS) Program, in November 2004. The SOS program created a dedicated local street fund for repair, rehabilitation, and maintenance of local roadways from property tax revenues. In 2013, after the original programs tax increases ended, the City Council modified the funding source for this program to be from sales tax on construction. The City has created a similar program to fund the repair and maintenance of arterials and collector streets. The program is funded through a one percent utility tax. While the available funding through this program is limited, which makes prioritizing projects challenging, the City has been able to maximize the value of the available funds by using them to leverage grant funds, enabling significantly more arterial and collector street repair and maintenance to be completed. • Local Residential Street Before SOS Rebuild Local Residential Street After SOS Rebuild NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS Transportation systems and facilities can impact adjacent neighborhoods. Potential impacts result from increased traffic resulting from drivers seeking alternate routes to congested arterials, in an effort to save time. These impacts can include higher vehicle speeds resulting in potential safety concerns, and associated air and noise pollution. Neighborhoods throughout the City are concerned with these traffic impacts and want to discourage cut-through traffic. City policies discourage through traffic in neighborhoods. The City also has a traffic calming program that addresses the pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile traffic safety concerns that impact neighborhoods. The traffic calming program is a community-based program with the goal of identifying potential problems and development of solutions to help mitigate these impacts. The ',,rpter 2. The Street System Page 2-29 ORD.E Page 229 of 751 • try or Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • program raises public awareness of traffic safety issues and ways that people can help minimize traffic problems in their own neighborhoods. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070) provides that comprehensive plans should include a discussion of intergovernmental coordination efforts, including "an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions." Auburn works closely with neighboring cities, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and state and regional agencies to ensure coordinated efforts are made in developing all modes of the transportation system. • • Chapter 2. The.S'tm i Page 3n ORD.E Page 230 of 751 • ,i. ` ,, -4 �h t 1 . —A1 —r FyJ 1111.1 „......„.0 a Nit, ( T if a _ . , . .. . . . mil . . . 1 ,i Ill it r- . ming Le • . - IL .Illi /!/,' .: .44. . • :II” II ir II : i 4wo r - - lik MEL . ME 11% . atregplie - I ,, -- :1 til ,,_, `�,! I0 = ■1 IMP f ME I I ffr " . I i.. • I =Mit \mow:■ Ciw ��� ���■g_ . media moan.. 111 1111, .ip Wm pi ',I, pa: , 18 1111 P'_I"' Enil m n MIMI!Ira B. • ,_ Pi -.., i_.... . ,,. ...�.!lIIlM��1�� ___ • . >' —• ma„Tv--i: r 1,* '' 4 / • 161 1' - . _ .... • .. . NW/ ____ �► I■Vi . ramp, al =is .� C1 me miff= r ��I SIM; 'Rola . .,. ., 1 li !pr . Illi I _ . . .. iii ..„,. .. _, —1 ,i-r! 167, .Ps, f,.. , .., kir frif . LI; . kilqr4i , )„,.,A, . 7-. � G ��� ialri MEM IMU 41011. !Lige -II N 1 n Tripp 11 ; A ilia' . G ,•� City of Auburn • Future Minor Arterial 40.4# Future Non Resident Collector Auburn Transportation Plan 0 Functional Roadway Classification NHighway /\� Residential Collector N Rural Collector 0 1 NPrincipal Arterial "," Future Residential Collector "/ Local Miles NMinorArterial N Non Residential Collector /\/ Private Map 2-1 ORD.E Page 231 of 751 0 ,.A _. tit: y cm S.�7sH ST -4,1 . iiiI coL t ,� L_ �g�Nn g —I, 1 _ •c\'‘711'141/ �P .. S 287TH ST � cni 42NDS 43RD ST NE S 286TH ST S292NDST ® ® = p `9E 290TH O SE 293RD ST 1 W ,:f.. . . w lirt J Z �O n — I 5: 9TH ST w 1 , �� z 2 - , o o an f, L w z r 21STST lez SE 310TH ST I.g. r- z ® ® 1 % z MD / r z ■ SE 316TH S 923SZS�5 w , 18 . oN. S 324TH ST 4TH NE -1\.. x SE 323RD PL • ® I 1 o I 0 4TH ST SW r, 1 ® 7TH ST SE co INE, ® �L I %�, SCE \y C7 O"P } ��ASjSE �'� \___••-i% / _ „ lit o ® 22ND ST SE r m _ 25T I -- ®JTH ST SE gOya ti F M ,.1.1 ; 111 1- Y DR SE I/ ST ST Illb STUCK RIVER DR SE ' 1Cf) lli 1.1 I ���WAY S� o _sSE 45 till 1 p 1 _ ® w - 4�H ST SE ' glib 4 ¢ y w a a ` 2ND ST E P y ® EAVSTSE TH ST SE l` I m silNS E , s.0 GliD, . ..r-1 TDSTS :„ .... J AParks 100-999 Auburn Transportation Nan Oril) I Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2013) 0 1 11 I City of Auburn 1,000-9,999 Miles LJ -10,000+ Map 2-2 ORD.E Page 232 of 751 • 0 • w p,IS lit,..".: ' wall P.L VA ,.aa kyY�iWai��� z 50TN.ST NI 287TH ST- 4 D-ST NW •42ND-ST NE SE 286TH ST - I wrnSE 290TH ST w S 292ND ST(400/71....liiime,- S w > Q Li k. SF ❑ y . •. $ .295TH STIII , ..., Ii ^ - i' SE 299TH ST , • , 11111)7T Py S 305TH ST z a�� �w SJIH ST w co co w > = SE 307TH PL ii) I- o W co 0.1 tru isr ' z Q SE 312TH ST ZcC 41 z .„,,. se, ,, SE 316TH ler `- II8T E / • A y SE 320TH ST A W S 324TH ST a w 1\ -;-- p,./' o SE 323RD PI � p ' W•MAINST. EMAINST- .ii . 2ND ST - ' 4TH ST SW 4TH-ST SE .„§) 8TH ST 'Cll.°LAMOND Rf1gE___ il U I Li 1. U.) y o■ 1�N ST SE _ cn Y ciN 22NDSTSEr w J 25TH SAT co m wTH ST SE /r y N V ` / Q—Lr- 29TH ST SE > 32ND ST Stir, ( ci L.. STUCK RIVER DR SE ik- l J.,.§,1,7. L c co Azoilamenomis"" i 1‘73011(.° J I r� Q- .- 4�H ST SE 0I F'P co \ s0 w Y0q YS� a w tis co o ST SE _¢ • OLL J 5TEN........\ LO E 7 2� 2ND ST E P a A Z r • cc I A � �'-1762ND ST SE `I -< 64TH SST SE < • m ITt ) \ ! I_ I \ f .r--- 7313,3 4'T SC I , . .._ ,,!---1\ .°`""' Priority 2 WSDOT Auburn Transportation Plan 0 N Current local Truck Routes N Current Local Truck Route Truck Routes 11 Parks M Future local Truck Route ~M` Future Local Truck Route M 0 1 [ City or Auburn NCurrent Through Truck Route "IIJJ Miles • 0. Future Through Truck Route Map 2-3 ORD.E Page 233 of 751 • • • •J ,1u,. / , 2 L 50TH ST NE ( h I s oaonir�ST 1' Jcn S 287TH ST - - 4 D ST NW 42ND ST NE , Sr 286TH ST z �2� SE 290TH ' --it SE 288TI I CT S 292ND ST w z 2 ti 2� s��9SrH.T cowe Co O u J Q 1�67J re ^� �t SE 99TH ST ��p - C1Q' S 305TH ST r' Z oaf S HST w co > \U = SE 307TH PL = j F- r _ J z QDIY z ~ �' iT / co 8TH SE 320TH ST --- w S 324TH ST it 2 _ i8 I- w r SE 323RD PL i z o m 0 E MAIN ST 2ND ST S 4TH ST SW i 4TH ST SE t`' 8. . 81-I ST i KDIAMQND Ras€� co I coa x F SCE', �c / CO 1�4`'SSE o�� \_—s-\ / \ Y 22ND ST SE w/ 0 25TH ST SE mco 26TH.STSE29TH ST SE >I �- L 32ND ST SESTUCK RIVER:11;41\:41411\1 SE 4- co 36TH SZ 351 c-,- S- co o .‘SE 5- `lam r -a4/ 47rh ST SE stu co 6`y cm i I1' a ySF w w co UJ N O <9 66TH ST SE rt CC 'F6' I gTE ug 9Z� I 2ND ST E P a 11 r co 62ND ST SE 64TH 51 SE Ut 65T"FT-b l 5 m Q .i 7''130STSk ii I City of Auburn /NV T3 (300-4,000) Auburn Transportation Plan 0i__1 Freight Routes Classification Map ^ /Nee Class T-1 to T-5 1 /T1 (Over 10,000) �V T4(100. 300) Annual Tons (in thousands) 0Miles ` ' O� V T2(4,000- 10,000) T5(Over 20 in 60 Days) Map 2-4 ORD.E Page 234 of 751 • • 0 w A Fi l.• w4 �L rJ cI 1.,h+ fAill'',,,-._,.,,- 151 - w 50TH S. NE ( �4 i L 441 SE 282ND S J - P ri S 287TH STy 4�1D ST NW 42ND ST NE SE 286TH ST �sz w 1SC 288T1 I-ST �Ow CO `SE290TH ST cu S 292ND ST 8 w z i- e S z -co 02� � SrH ST w a E'10 > 1S i �� _ 0.2`. SE 299TH ST rto -1y - - �- �1'�P _w S .. HST ; ,s, cf) Lu Z s ��/ z 2. CO ? SE 3071 -L lirI Y W .- M Z ty Z , s O SE 316TH ST Z H y \ c� 8TH 14' w 25 Z S 324TH ST ti w SE 323RD PL y i- o m y N4 l \----, 2ND STS I 8411141:3=1 �' 4TH ST SWC 4TH ST SE { -L gUeURN B AST fO CK O(qD RASES tD I Li ¢ w y .ter..,._.,... Jik U sc ,v V. CS IW / w 17TH SZ SE N� II / Y 4-, 22ND ST SE \ r pj 25TH ST SE r q m i 26TH ST SE Cq0 / I � FMY aR SE 27 31ST ST• 7 , El " STUCK RIVER DR SE UJ S�c'� Y SE / w 3 35TH �" y p 5�c,E 5� 4� 167 33 5 0 Im Pi l Cq- 4jTH ST SE w \ i y � 6 y <>I r� 56TH a t. 57T' •R SE 5 2NDSTSTSE E P SE 6 HSI SE 17 I•-•<. 64-TVISI 0,vHS ,E D I l 72ND ST ST------- 1 S--- 1 1 1 . ) Auburn Transportation Plan 0 10,0 Corridor Sections Auburn LOS Corridors 0 1 1 J City of Auburn Miles —1 I Map 2-5 ORD.E Page 235 of 751 I 0 3 G 277-FI I ST sail 1 8 38 x\P S 287TH ST 42ND ST NW 42ND ST NE G Z SsZa7THST Z 1- TH£T N CO 0 m p W 0 37TH ST NE ,2 w I,, M M 0= SE 195TH St N. 0 I m Z2 S 02ND PL ccz l� z SE 301STST" 2 © Z y ©304TH ST 304TH ST } 2• 0 z Lil > Z SII : S O J yyyy ll 21ST ST NE a 16TH ST NE 19 E 312TH ST [n M Z iogiogoge..i...1" en wl• S 318TH ST 2� 1- 0 >co = 11 z 8TH STN enco S 324TH ST /),/Cyr? zI 4TH ST NE ��• Qv /L`� L:01 -r en c 5 1\9-, LL21 y cncnw ' i' 1-. Et 1 S 4TH ST SW l c 6TH ST E 30 e'\ 0)1107-----. s.a RN-BLACK.DIAA ONPACt is rl ! .:. ,. -1. --� 15TH ST SW N '-, t~Aul �� N-SE • O WSKPY n 0 WIm CD I AU$VRN W 20TH ST 5&. 12 1 15 \ 1 >> 25TH ST SE / m y ApF � DFi'S N111✓/ to a z co STUCK RIVER DR SE co 5 I-- N Oco co5�51 SE 67 Ia o m -vi_ N ti 90, 47 xi- rV Q9 T�'- 4 ST SE 41 ,�� SF w pr coNS �'SFy a WAYS W w cc F �u w 56TH ST SE cc �_ yet a 2ND ST E P I 4:Ty- }, QQ�e� i I i ,11 I ` 2022 City Improvements Auburn Transportation Plan 0 dooSsifTransportation Improvement Projects 0 1 20350City Improvements Miles s City&Auburn Map 2-6 ORD.E Page 236 of 751 • Y A U IIN` ti,,‘ w.I ►L 1 C., 4' rt w_1 2 50TH ST ME ( ��---* r r r 5287TH ST I zC�P DST NW 42ND ST NE S1286TH ST ; I • • 6E290TH St cli S 292ND ST Pr zTyl cT Z Q� r % • r 2C9 `''9STIi6T -4 800 F II— (167 = i If •Iw.J pZ SE:99TH ST — = 1 R r I 341 r S 305TH ST z��� -----�! -r HST W \,.. iiii....... ; •rr.11v ft W • r Zcv SE 307TH�L � r I ) , 1, iil Iii m r iarciaaaarrats, co F- - 2 4 r-` "tea �• cc CD ---.,-- \ M}. o; 1 ; �� ; Z SE 316TH ST ; > S. Il ill l',‘, 9\ S 324TH S i SE 323Rb PL r v' .� O \D.: 'y+.VY11a4111+F,i r-IG�AAilollBi- J I 2ND ST S I L l_ _l 4TH ST SW I. . . .rr ! . 18,' 8' ',r7,11=-.7-77-7-1— q�&URN B C 8 ST kOIAMOND RD-SE-�- aOfrilirri-v(---- I iW 11— / }s E �Q AT BSS N� / I-- • Y --- 22ND 41 LI I- ST SE yl� Ivl 0j .25THST'SE : m tll 26TH ST SE I oF�YOR SE- STUCK s -,'' .. I UJ RIVER DR SE I 5� U) a 35TN`Np'Y S o 'S SE' a AN- ‘,9] I �a� �a 40 I 4. q? l ❑ O 7.1-i ST SE y W II \\. r S,Sl ST SEII m r �s..--ATH ST SE LL 1 2NDSTE P 'i ,---1 62ND S7 SE gASHST SE rt1► � ‘01\ LV4tmar- ''�`'biii�ill \ I \ I 72ND ST S I to ti I City of Auburn o PED Signal Auburn Transportation Plan 0 m • Future Variable Message MI • County Signal WSDOT Intelligent Transportation Systems City Signal 0 1 0 ITS Copper ll Miles ~ ITS Fiber ORD.E 4! Ne Future ITS Corridor Page 237 of 751 Map 2-7 rTY°F Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN wASh1ING FON • • y, r' CHAPTER 3. • P NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION • ; Non-motorized transportation is an integral .;'p component of Auburn's transportation system. Non-motorized travel includes walking, bicycling, .Ili,..`-. ` and equestrian travel. The City seeks to enhance the r_ 1 non-motorized travel environment both for recreational travel and trips that might otherwise be taken via a car or bus in order to improve mobility Riding on the Interurban Trail and environmental health. The City recognizes that the evolution of the transportation system has prioritized the automobile as the primary travel mode. A side effect of this process has been the erosion of conditions favorable to non-motorized travel.This chapter seeks to redress the balance by enhancing conditions in which non-motorized modes are a realistic and attractive travel option. Planning and developing a strong non-motorized network supports several state and national acts including Washington's Growth Management Act,Commute Trip Reduction Act, the federal Clean • Air Act,the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA),MAP 21 (Federal Surface Transportation Bill) and its successors. Supporting the non-motorized system helps ensure compliance with these initiatives and the healthy community principles espoused by PSRC through Vision 2040.It also increases funding opportunities for City projects. Improving the non-motorized system also helps address the findings of the citywide Health Impact Assessment process which recommended that the City improve sidewalk connectivity,improve the pedestrian environment,eliminate natural and man-made mobility barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists,improve transit access,improve traffic safety,pedestrian safety and personal security. This chapter is divided into three subsections: pedestrian travel, bicycle travel, and equestrian travel. Each subsection contains an assessment of existing conditions and needs, followed by guidelines for development of the future system. 3.1 Pedestrian Travel As a Regional Growth Center,the City encourages transportation planning that emerges from a clear land-use plan based on a community vision and the values expressed in Imagine Auburn. In this vision, Auburn supports higher density housing in the downtown;neighborhood commercial districts; and landscaped, pedestrian-oriented street and sidewalk design.This pattern of development reinforces a positive pedestrian environment. • (hapler.3. i\on-J l otorq.al 7 ram po ation ('4,,;- ORD.E Page 238 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN ,\\,1 1 I\(;ION 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT :n ) Auburn has many assets,which contribute to a S",.< welcoming pedestrian environment,most notably a 4 pedestrian-scaled downtown and an extensive #111 gYr :1 network of trails.The needs assessment highlights -Y- these existing assets and identifies improvement ,_ - — needs. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT i As a whole, Auburn's urban fabric in the downtown New Pedestrian Crossing at Green River has remained intact and supports a positive College on S 320th Street pedestrian environment. Businesses, shops,and single-family homes front streets with sidewalks and street trees. However,some of the older sections of sidewalks need repair or replacement. Since adoption of the 2009 Transportation Plan, there have been sidewalk,ADA and lighting improvements to Main Street,S Division Street Promenade, City Hall Plaza and Plaza Park and behind the shops on East Main Street. New growth in the downtown core has or will result in the development of multi - story residential and office buildings and senior housing,helping renew the pedestrian infrastructure and creating a need for continued effort to maintain and improve the sidewalk system. In addition, the Sounder commuter rail station and transit hub at West Main Street and C Street SW provide pedestrians more options for connecting to regional destinations.These improvements contribute to a more hospitable environment for pedestrians. The city has an annual sidewalk repair program which focuses on ADA improvements, responding to complaints, repairing identified hazards,and improving areas with high pedestrian use. Commercial development outside the downtown exists primarily along arterials and is dominated by strip development and auto-oriented businesses. Although sidewalks are provided on most arterials,pedestrians may feel exposed to the traffic. Surface parking lots border the sidewalks, and driveways interrupt the continuity of the sidewalk system.The heavy volumes of vehicular traffic and wide streets along arterials, such as Auburn Way, pose a barrier for pedestrians walking along or crossing the roadway. Sidewalk Inventory A sidewalk inventory was conducted as part of the Plan update in 2005. A subsequent inventory was conducted in 2008 to collect sidewalk data for the West Hill and Lea Hill where a large scale annexation into the City took place in 2007.The inventory identifies sidewalks in the City, and rated their condition.This inventory continues to serve as a guide to help the City identify problem areas and program improvements according to prioritization guidelines,outlined later in this chapter. The older residential neighborhoods tend to have sidewalks on both sides of the street,but they vary widely in condition and construction standards. Some residential areas, such as southwest Lea Hill,were built under King County's jurisdiction and sidewalk construction was not required. Breaks in the sidewalk network require pedestrians to maneuver around parked cars, into private yards,or into the street. In newer neighborhoods such as Lakeland Hills, sidewalks built to the city standards applicable at the time of their construction are provided on both sides of the street. C.bdpter 3. Non-Motmi:;ed I raa portation Pate ; ORD.E Page 239 of 751 'ITY Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • The sidewalk survey of the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas revealed a sporadic and often disconnected sidewalk system. Several of the newer residential developments have sidewalks,but many of the older residential areas and arterial streets are missing large segments of sidewalk, resulting in an inconsistent pedestrian environment. Map 3-1 illustrates the existing and proposed sidewalk network within the City. Trail Network Auburn's developing trail network provides local and regional connections for both recreational use and commuting. Currently the only regional trails that have been developed include the Interurban and portions of the Green River and White River Trails.The Lakeland Hills Trail network provides connections to neighborhood parks, community center, and to the City of Sumner via a tunnel under the BNSF railway. Map 3-2 illustrates the existing and proposed trail network within the City. SCHOOL ACCESSIBILITY School safety is a major concern for parents, students, the school districts, and the City alike. The Auburn School District,working with an advisory committee,has established a safe walking area for each elementary and middle school based on the presence of sidewalks,walking paths, and safe neighborhood streets,as well as the availability of safe street crossings and the traffic conditions in the surrounding neighborhoods. All routes within the safe walking areas are designated as 'Safe Routes to School'. Occasionally,individual schools will notify parents and students of preferred walking routes within each area. Since the last major update of the comprehensive plan the following Safe Walking Routes • improvements have been made throughout Auburn; • School Zone Flashing Beacons were installed at all elementary and middle schools. • Rectangular Rapid Flashing Warning Beacons were installed at the existing crosswalk at E St NE and 4th St NE for Washington Elementary. • A new crosswalk with warning signage and ADA pedestrian ramps was installed at K St SE &23rd St SE for Pioneer Elementary.This also improved drainage on the street. • Rainier Middle School received improved crosswalks, signage,and ADA pedestrian ramps along 116th Ave SE. • Lea Hill Elementary received 600 feet of sidewalk,curb and gutter, and ADA pedestrian ramps on the south side of SE 312th Street as well as pedestrian push buttons and countdown pedestrian signal heads at the intersection of SE 312th Street and 124th Ave SE. • The new Auburn High School created all new sidewalk and crosswalks with bulb outs on both East Main Street and 4th Street NE. • New crosswalks with warning signage,ADA pedestrian ramps,and curb bulb outs were added at Terminal Park Elementary. • New curb,gutter, ADA pedestrian ramps and pavement was constructed on H St SE between 17th and 21st St SE for Olympic Middle School. C.bap:er.3. Nnn-:Ilotorited 7ran.00r/a/ion .Pane 3-3 ORD.E Page 240 of 751 AiIY'BURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON Some of these improvements were made possible by a Safe Routes to School grant.The flashing beacons have been funded through a combination of grant programs and City resources. Despite the progress that has been made over the past several years, there are still areas of need. The following needs were identified to enhance and improve the safety for school children in and around the school safe walking areas. Pioneer Elementary School Curb&gutter, sidewalks and ADA ramps along K St SE between 21st St SE and 25th St SE. Cascade Middle School The crossing at M Street NE and 24th Street NE experiences heavy traffic. The City and school district continue to cooperate to increase the safety of this crossing near the school. Dick Scobee Elementary School The City will continue to coordinate with the School District in exploring ways to improve access to surrounding neighborhoods to increase the school's designated safe walking area. Terminal Park Elementary School Curb gutter,sidewalks,and ADA ramps along B St SE between 12th St SE and 17th St SE. Evergreen Heights Elementary School Curb,gutter,sidewalks,and roadway improvements -L along S 316th between 51st Ave S and the eastern MON Ag F L boundary of the school.This includes access and �. � a circulation improvements to the school and • r intersection improvements at 56th Ave S. Hazelwood Elementary School 4 *l 1 �� 7y * Sidewalk and ADA curb ramp improvements along SE 304th Street between 112th Ave SE and 116th �' 1 Ave SE and along 118th Ave SE from SE 304th to the north. Safe Walking Route to School Lea Hill Elementary School Sidewalks and ADA ramps along both sides of 124th Ave SE between SE 304th St and SE 312th St. Mountain View High School Sidewalks along 124th Ave SE between SE 284th St and SE 304th St,and along 132nd Ave SE between SE 288th St and SE 299th St. Riverside High School&Ilalko Elementary Pedestrian crossing of A Street SE and the BNSF Railway would greatly benefit students at these two schools. A 2015 study identified a preferred crossing alternative for future development. Chapter 3. Non-Mntmi:;ed 1 mpo tatio+r Page 3-4 ORD.E Page 241 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN • Lakeland Hills Elementary Encouraging increased walking and biking to this school would provide the greatest benefit for easing traffic congestion and safety concerns.Additionally an onsite parking and access redesign would further reduce school pick up and drop off related congestion. Chinook Elementary Sidewalks along Auburn Way South between Hemlock St SE and Academy Dr SE. Additionally intersection improvements have been identified to reduce conflicts and improve circulation for buses. Accessible Routes of Travel The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that all new public,commercial and institutional developments meet ADA standards. Furthermore, existing public buildings, public outdoor facilities,and public rights-of-way shall be retrofitted to achieve accessibility. An accessible route of travel is designated to accommodate the needs of many different people,including those who are blind,using wheelchairs,pushing a stroller or cart,or injured. The law requires that municipalities have a transition plan in place to address ADA issues.The City of Auburn is in the process of completing that plan and ADA design specifications can be found in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards manual. Site Design Pedestrian conditions should be evaluated at the earliest stage of new development.The zone • between the development and the public right-of-way needs to contribute to pedestrian network connectivity and continuity. In addition to the public right-of-way,the interior of the site ought to be examined for suitable pedestrian circulation,and how the two are connected.Wherever possible, walkways should be placed along the most direct routes to connect buildings,parking,bus stops, and other attractions. In some cases,walking trails that link residential streets to collectors or arterials can provide a more direct pedestrian connection than travel along the sidewalk network, particularly in neighborhoods without a street grid system, specifically those with cul-de-sacs. FUTURE SYSTEM This section describes the City's vision for the future pedestrian system and identifies programs and initiatives that will enable it to achieve this vision. Downtown The downtown is historically the social heart of the community,a place for people to interact.It is considered one of the primary pedestrian-oriented areas in the City. Important existing pedestrian downtown linkages include connections from W Main Street to the transit hub and commuter rail station,and between W Main Street and the Multicare Auburn Medical Center.The Downtown Plan, a special area plan adopted in 2001 as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, anticipates high pedestrian oriented developments in this area,particularly around the Auburn Station.The Downtown Plan also identifies W Main Street,A Street SW, Division Street, and the alley south of Main Street as high priority pedestrian corridors. In addition, several recently completed projects have helped improve non-motorized access to the downtown and transit station,including the City C:iapter i. \'em-a1ataYScd7rampalerlmn Pers ORD.E Page 242 of 751 CrTYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Hall Plaza and Plaza Park project completed in 2010, the Division Street Promenade Project completed in 2012 and the A Street NW Extension project,opened in June 2013. Auburn Station has created demand for new mixed-use development,including commercial and residential elements.The City is committed to focusing new commercial and residential development adjacent to the Auburn Station and has been working on partnerships to bring several mixed-use developments to Downtown.These developments include pedestrian friendly design and streetscape improvements. A vital pedestrian network that extends beyond downtown is a key element in the revitalization of the downtown core. Commercial Corridors The City should encourage major employers to locate near transit routes and stops. Furthermore, pedestrian connections from residential areas to commercial corridors can be enhanced through site design policies that encourage more direct non-motorized connections to major retail locations. Future planning along commercial corridors should also include amenities such as landscaping adjacent to the sidewalk,improved pedestrian crossings,and enhanced bus stops at high use locations. Auburn has several commercial corridors,most notably Auburn Way North and South, that are frequently traveled by pedestrians.While most of these areas have sidewalks, there is the opportunity to enhance the pedestrian environment by providing additional protected crossings, making improvements to lighting,completing remaining sidewalk gaps and eliminating ADA accessibility barriers. For instance,pedestrian crossing issues arise because pedestrians often cross at uncontrolled or mid-block locations rather than walking to the nearest signalized crossing. This dynamic is partially attributable to the location of bus stops in relation to employment centers. Hence, efforts should be made to locate bus stops so commuters crossing to the opposite side of the road are dropped off and picked up near a signalized intersection. Residential Neighborhoods Investment in Auburn's neighborhoods is an essential component of providing a comprehensive and functional pedestrian network.As noted in the needs assessment, sidewalk conditions vary throughout the City.This plan acknowledges the need to retrofit the pedestrian network in many areas of the City and incorporate pedestrian facilities into new development. Financial mechanisms to help accomplish this goal are described later in this chapter. High Priority Pedestrian Corridors Map 3-1 identifies High Priority Pedestrian Corridors that are currently lacking a complete sidewalk system. Some of the corridors have sidewalks on one side or for portions of the corridor. Others are missing sidewalks altogether. These High Priority Pedestrian Corridors were selected based on the following criteria: pedestrian volumes;proximity to schools,parks,transit routes and commercial areas; and where missing gaps can be completed. Chapter 3. Non-Afnto,izell i ran portation I',r i_n ORD.E Page 243 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • The High Priority Pedestrian Corridors are roadway corridors where the City intends to target investment in pedestrian facilities. The City's current half street policy requires sidewalk to be constructed by developers whenever significant improvements are made to a property.This has proven to be an effective means of building out the sidewalk network. However,it is a slow process because it relies on new development or redevelopment to occur,making it difficult to complete whole corridors. By programming 's specific pedestrian corridors for investment, the :14 City can leverage grant dollars and other . resources to more strategically complete gaps in ' y. key pedestrian corridors. The High Priority Pedestrian Corridors identified in Map 3-1 are regularly reviewed for inclusion in the City's Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program and for grant funding opportunities. Auburn Multi-Use Trail NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS The Auburn Parks,Recreation&Open Space Plan is currently being updated and will identify specific projects for the development of local and regional trails. Thus far the long term list includes: 1111 The Auburn-Pacific Trail provides a multi-use path that improves access from the White River to the Interurban Trail. A planned pedestrian crossing, under the BNSF railroad tracks just north of the BNSF Stuck River Bridge (over the White River),will improve the regional trail system by providing a connection between the City of Pacific and Auburn's White River Trail connection to A Street SE. Funding is still needed for the Auburn section of the Green River Trail. Planning efforts are also focused on the Auburn Environmental Park and connecting the park to the Interurban Trail.This unique park project shows residents the diversity of the ecosystem along the Mill Creek corridor. Additional trail planning is underway for connecting the Fenster Natural Park to the Green Valley Road area. An important component of Auburn's trail system includes trailheads. Trailheads should be inviting to users and provide amenities such as parking, bicycle racks,information kiosks,restroom facilities, water fountains, trash receptacles,and seating facilities. Trailheads should be constructed and improved as Auburn's trail system further develops. See Map 3-2 for existing and proposed trails and trailhead locations. FUNDING MECHANISMS Sidewalk Improvement Program The City of Auburn has an Annual Citywide Sidewalk Repair and Improvement Program to repair damaged sidewalks,tripping hazards,and to complete small missing links in the sidewalk network. 5 Chapter 3. ;Non-it ioIoriz d J an. ottatioir Pro. 3-7 ORD.E Page 244 of 751 a ryo Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON These funds are essential for promoting non-motorized travel and can be used to leverage other funding sources, such as state and federal grants or other city capital projects. Auburn has identified three principal areas in which sidewalk improvements should be prioritized: corridors that provide access to and within the downtown, school zones, and parks with a focus on addressing potential hazards and areas of known complaints. Additional criteria for priority access improvement could include,but are not limited to,areas with high concentrations of senior citizens or disabled citizens,areas with high volumes of pedestrian-transit interaction,areas where private improvements such as trees have damage the public infrastructure and areas where property owners are willing to financially participate in the construction of sidewalk improvements through a local improvement district (LID). In considering projects, staff also review existing street deferral agreements to determine if the improvements previously allowed to be deferred are now needed and should be completed by the private party. "Save Our Streets" Program Sidewalks will be prioritized: In November 2004, Auburn residents approved • Where hazardous conditions are Proposition 1, "Save Our Street" Program,which present; created a dedicated local street fund.This money • On school walk routes; was set aside for repair and maintenance of local ■ Where extensive improvements are roadways which can sometimes also include needed in a single neighborhood; sidewalk repair and rebuild. In 2013,the city • Along streets with curb and gutter; council modified the funding source for this • Along Downtown pedestrian program to be from Construction Sales Tax corridors; revenues and no longer from property taxes. ■ Where curb ramps are missing;and "Arterial Preservation"Program • Where they will complete a missing link in a pedestrian network. The City also currently implements the annual • Where property owners are willing to arterial street preservation program funded by a financially participate in the 1% utility tax. Pedestrian,ADA,and safety construction of sidewalk improvements are included in many of the arterial improvements through an LID. improvement projects funded by this program. Local Improvement Districts Local Improvement Districts (LID) enable city investment in a specified area by leveraging city funds with contributions from property owners in the district. LID's use limited city resources to improve neighborhood quality and can be used to finance new sidewalks. Safety Education and Enforcement Awareness of pedestrian safety issues should be promoted through educational programs and enforcement efforts.This combination helps reinforce key safety issues such as safe pedestrian crossings and speeding.The City will proactively work to identify problem areas and issues.The following list contains examples of some techniques that can be employed in these efforts. • Maintaining non-motorized travel information kiosks at key City destinations (e.g.Main Street,Outlet Collection,Emerald Downs,trails). Chapter 3. Non-Al-anti:ed 1 ianiporI itioi Pale 3-8 ORD.E Page 245 of 751 CETYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • ■ Displayingeducational information in City publications,on the website,and on TV. • Maintaining and expanding wayfinding signage to direct pedestrians and bicyclists. • Partnering with the School District to teach children safe walking and biking behaviors. • Launching public information campaigns for problematic locations and partnering with the Police Department to provide enforcement. • Increasing driver awareness of vehicle speeds through the presence of radar speed signs where appropriate. Enforcing pedestrian,bicyclist,and driver infractions. 3.2 Bicycle Travel Bicycle facilities are an important component of Auburn's transportation and recreational infrastructure. Bicycling provides an environmentally friendly travel mode and helps citizens to maintain a healthy lifestyle. It also helps improve traffic congestion and air quality by providing an alternative to driving.Increasingly,bicycle commuting is becoming a more popular alternative,and the City must take steps to provide a more functional and attractive network for commute cyclists, in addition to recreational cyclists. NEEDS ASSESSMENT Existing Conditions The topography in the Auburn Valley is flat and conducive to cycling for a range of skill levels. • Areas along the Green and White Rivers provide recreational opportunities for multi-use trails that accommodate bicyclists,pedestrians and equestrians. The Interurban Trail is part of a major north- south regional trail system.The Green River trail is also an extension of a north-south regional trail. Therefore,Auburn has a good network of existing or planned north-south recreational trails. However,there are few existing cross-town connections and new connections onto the West Hill and Lea Hill are needed. Cross-town bike connections to the West Hill and Lea Hill areas of Auburn are more challenging due to steep topography. Yet investing in these connections is important because a significant number of Auburn residents live in these areas. Building these connections would improve bicycle access to regional transit,local employment the regional trail system,and to downtown Auburn. Recreational and commuter cyclists travel along the Interurban Trail to areas north and south of Auburn. Cyclists also frequently ride along S 277th Street to the east side of Green River Road,and down along the Green River to 8th Street NE,or down R Street NE to SE Auburn Black Diamond Road. SE Auburn Black Diamond Road and SE Green Valley Road are popular routes for accessing areas east of Auburn. However, these roads are characterized by challenging cycling conditions and are not suitable for inexperienced cyclists. Once in Auburn,there is especially a need to increase the number of east-west bicycle facilities. Investing in trail connections to improve bicycle access in these areas should also be a priority. Bicycle lanes are limited on city arterials and collectors,making it difficult both for regional and local riders to navigate for any reasonable distance through the City. Limited bicycle storage is also a hindrance to cyclists. Map 3-2 identifies existing and planned trails and bike facilities in the City. • Chapter 3. ,\n-.tloloriird Tran.tporiation 1'u,,, ORD.E Page 246 of 751 arvor ' Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Auburn Bicycle Task Force In March 2010,the city formed the City of Auburn Bicycle Task Force. It was intended that the Bicycle Task Force would further refine the City's goals and policies for its bicycle transportation system. The Task Force was comprised of a broad cross section of community members and interested parties that were charged to develop recommendations on bicycle facilities,issues and opportunities centered on the following three principles: • Connections—for example, how do bicycle riders get from the north end to the south end of the City or from Lakeland to Lea Hill? • Recreation Opportunities—for example, how does the City further build and capitalize on a bicycle network to support and enhance the recreation options for its citizens? • Economic Development—for example,how does the City capitalize on the Interurban Trail as a conduit of customers for existing and new businesses? Bike Improvements Completed and Planned in the Near-Term Future The work of the task force has informed and guided city decisions on future bike lane and trail improvements and connections. Its work is directly reflected in improvements already made as well as the future bike lanes and trail improvements shown in Map 3-2. Since 2009 bike lanes have been added to 124th Ave SE,and SE 320th Street near Green River College on Lea Hill,a new bike lane connection has been created by the construction of the new A Street NW corridor. Bikes lanes have been added as part of the new M Street SE BNSF underpass project and sharrows (share the road with bike symbols)have been added to East Main Street. Bike lanes are part of the new planned West Main Street project and the F Street SE project includes development of a Bicycle Boulevard and Bike Share Program. Bicycle Facility Classification The American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has developed classifications for bicycle facilities and parking. Bicycle classification is based on the design and exclusiveness of use. Bicycle Facility Classification Existing Class I multi-use trails in the City • Separate Facility(Class I)—A non- include S 277th St,Interurban Trail,White River motorized two-way paved facility, that is 'Frail, and Green River Trails. physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or Class II bicycle lanes added since the last major barrier. update include; • Bike Lane(Class II)—An exclusive on ■ Terrace Drive NW(15th to W St) street one way lane for bicyclists • A ST NW/B ST NW(3rd to 30th) delineated with signing and striping • 14th St NW(A NW to A NE) • Shared Lanes (Class III)—A lane shared by vehicles and bicycles.Wider lanes that ' R St SE(17th to White River) may be delineated with shared use • M St SE (3rd to 8th) markings and signage. • 116th Ave SE(SE 304th to SE 312th) • Bicycle Boulevard—A bicycle focused roadway designated with enhanced signage and special pavement markings and bicycle-friendly design standards such as wide curb lanes and bicycle safe ORJ.E drain grates.Typically designed to Page 247 of 751 connect key bicycle destinations. CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • Class III shared facilities were tested on R St NE/SE, Auburn Black Diamond Road and E Main St.They were well received by the cycling community and continue to be maintained. Shared facilities will continue to be implemented on other appropriate roadways. Bike parking facilities are classified by length of use: long term,medium term,and short term.The longer bikes are to be stored, the more durable the facility's design must be. Long term bike storage facilities are available at Auburn Station.The City currently provides short term bike storage throughout the downtown core. Improvement Needs Cyclists desire safe routes that make connections throughout the City and to regional points of interests.The existing facilities while being continuously improved still fall short of creating a well- connected bicycle network in Auburn. The City plans to build out the bicycle network shown in Map 3-2 and provide better east-west connections. Upgrading bicycle facilities on city streets is a very important component of this plan. Auburn shall make greater efforts in the future to encourage bicycle use,particularly for commuting purposes,as a form of transportation demand management (TDM). One mechanism of doing so is to ensure that bike lanes and trails which serve major employers are prioritized. The City needs to take a more aggressive role in programming implementation of the future bicycle network identified in this chapter,ensuring that eventually all residents of and employees in Auburn feel comfortable commuting on bike. In addition, Auburn should seek outlets,including the City's website, to provide up-to-date information on bicycling options within the City and to regional destinations. • The Commute Trip Reduction(CTR) program provides a formal mechanism for encouraging these practices and is required by state law for employers with 100 or more employees arriving at a single location during the AM peak. Auburn's CTR program calls out bicycle storage facilities,lockers, changing areas,and showers as measures employers can take to meet CTR goals. In addition, Auburn can use the SEPA process to encourage development of these facilities at the time of new development or tenant improvements. The Downtown Plan also discusses the need for improving bicycle facilities in the area. On-street bicycle facilities will be sought in association with planned roadway improvements. In addition,the City should investigate providing bicycle storage and other amenities on City owned properties. ,. FUTURE TRAVEL The future bicycle network includes corridors for ti h: regional, recreational,and cross-town 1 connections. The regional corridors will provide if.ii1;,i ;,�t connections to the Valley communities as well other ; �; areas of King and Pierce Counties. Local biking w groups have identified the Interurban Trail and Green River Trail as important regional connections. •�Ne.,, v Other planned regional connections will link Auburn=`' ' to attractions around the Puget Sound. The Work is Easier when Shared • Chapter 3. .NVon-Moto,./d Trancpu#aliii' t' ''c• 3-/I ORD.E Page 248 of 751 CITY Of Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING ION The Green and White River corridors are multi-functional,providing recreational opportunities for regional and local bicycle trips. Therefore,the City has prioritized the completion of both these trail systems. Also, Auburn will seek to enhance portions of City trail systems whenever possible,by providing amenities for non-motorized travelers such as rest areas,as well as safety improvements including warning signage and grade separated trails. As shown in Map 3-2, the bicycle routes identified for future development will consist of a mix of interconnected local trails and on- street bike facilities linking Auburn's neighborhoods. The future Bonneville Power Trail will be a separated, hard surfaced trail crossing the Lea Hill area and connecting to the Interurban Trail and West Hill via on-street bicycle facilities.This new bike route is planned from Lea Hill through Isaac Evans and Dykstra Park to connect to downtown Auburn via the new A Street NW corridor. Numerous other on-street bicycle facilities and trails are planned. The selection of bike facility projects will be based upon safety, route continuity and connectivity. In addition to new bicycle corridors, spot safety improvements are an important component of the City's future bicycle network. Improvements including flashing beacons have already been made at the Interurban Trail crossing of 15th Street SW and are planned at the Interurban Trail crossing of West Main Street and C Street SW and Ellingson. In addition,safe access to downtown Auburn and onto West Hill, Lea Hill and Lakeland are a priority for the City. Typical bicycle route improvements along a Class I facility include purchasing the right-of-way, designing the trail, and constructing the trail and trailhead. For a Class II pathway,improvements include striping lanes,installing warning and directional signage,and painting bike symbols on the pavement. For a roadway where bikes will share the lane with vehicles it may include the installation of shared use markings and signage. As this plan is updated in the future,emphasis should continue to be placed on developing a safe and convenient bicycling environment for both recreational and commuter cyclists of all experience levels. 3.3 Equestrian Travel Auburn citizens have a long history of supporting the planning and development of equestrian facilities.The City intends to increase its network of soft-surface,multi-use trails in more rustic locations with appropriate facilities suitable for equestrian use. NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS Auburn's equestrian trail system is quite limited.The Parks Department currently manages a two- mile, soft-surface trail,along the White River at Roegner and Game Farm Wilderness Parks. Otherwise, there are no formal equestrian trails in Auburn. Horse owners do have informal access to the soft-surface path adjacent to the Interurban trail,as well as large open spaces in the rustic area just south of the White River and east of Kersey Way in southeast Auburn.To reach the open areas,many ride along the edge of roads such as 53rd and 56th Streets SE.These are narrow roads with gravel shoulders. Drainage swales run parallel to many Chapter 3. Non-llfotorizedT assportatian Paige 3-12 ORD.E Page 249 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON portions• of these roads, and while conditions vary,typically there is a narrow unpaved shoulder or p grassed area alongside the road where horses can walk. IMPROVEMENT NEEDS The lack of equestrian trail miles in the City and connectivity to regional equestrian facilities are two areas that need improvement. As indicated by Table 3-1, there are currently two-miles of formal equestrian trails in the City. This is a barrier to most equestrians,particularly those bringing horses via trailer. In order to become a more equestrian friendly community,Auburn must undertake planning initiatives to expand the current network. Table 3-1 Existing Equestrian Facilities Potential Within Facility Primary Users Auburn City Limits soft- Equestrians surface Off-road Cyclists 2.17 miles Trail Pedestrians Auburn,as a regional growth center,has elected to become increasingly urbanized. As the City continues to urbanize,it will seek opportunities to include equestrian planning in its infrastructure improvements. Special consideration for equestrian facilities should be given to southeast Auburn and Lea Hill as both have existing equestrian communities. • Loop trail development is one strategy that can be employed to increase the length of equestrian trails in Auburn. Loop trails can be linked to existing linear facilities,thereby increasing network miles. Opportunities to expand the equestrian trail system should be considered in all future infrastructure planning and development. Features such as busy arterial streets,steep slopes and narrow bridges are barriers to equestrian travel. Hence, equestrian trail planning should go hand in hand with other planning activities the City is undertaking.When planning equestrian trails, other facilities such as trailer parking and directional signage should be accommodated. FUTURE SYSTEM The southeast Auburn area, south of the White (Stuck) River and east of Kersey Way, should be designated as an Equestrian District. Future development in this area should be consistent with that designation. Southeast Auburn is particularly suitable as an Equestrian District because it contains a City watershed, shorelines of statewide significance, and numerous critical areas. Equestrian trails may be situated near some of these features,whereas more intense development may be unsuitable. Equestrian trails may also be appropriate for parts of Lea Hill, and should be evaluated.When locating equestrian trails along rustic roads,it may be appropriate to maximize trail potential by constructing a wider shoulder able to accommodate equestrian travel on one side of the road. Members of the equestrian community in Auburn have emphasized the desire for a trail connection between Roegner Park and southeast Auburn. One potential alignment would be along a route roughly parallel to Kersey Way and 53rd Street SE.The Parks Plan identifies this future trail as the Chapter 3. 'on-tlfolori.t lian.pw-tatiwi 1.),p 3-13 ORD.E Page 250 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Williams Trail. Potential obstacles include critical area impacts and right-of-way acquisition. The topography along Kersey Way includes steep hillsides and large drainage males. As trail planning progresses to a more detailed level, other alignments should be evaluated. The equestrian routes identified for future development are concentrated along the White River, the Green River, and in the properties in southeast Auburn. These routes are identified as soft-surface, multi-use trails that are suitable for riding and walking but do not meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Construction costs and the extent of clearing needed are much less for soft-surface trails than for paved trails. Some of the soft-surface trails are proposed to occur in conjunction with a paved trail. Summaries of trails that are appropriate for equestrian use are listed in Table 3-2. Design specifications for equestrian trails will be incorporated into the Auburn Engineering Design Standards manual. 3.4 Future Non-motorized System Auburn's future non-motorized system consists of an interconnected network of sidewalks,bike lanes,multi-use trails, and equestrian paths. The list of proposed projects in Table 3-2 is developed for planning purposes. Map 3-2 identifies the location of the trail projects identified in Table 3-2 and maps the future trail and bicycle network. Table 3-2 Future Trail Projects Trail Potential Name Description Users Green River This paved trail will be part of a regional recreational corridor. King County is the lead Bicyclists Trail administrator of the project but will work in collaboration with the City for the portion of the Equestrians trail in Auburn.The trail alignment will extend along the west bank of the Green River from S. Pedestrians 277th St., south to Brannan Park. From Brannan Park,the trail will then run south along M Street SE to 22nd Street NE,where it will turn east towards Dykstra Park. It will then cross the river at the Dykstra foot bridge to the east bank of the river. It will then parallel Green River Road and 104th Ave SE. Once across Lea Hill Road SE the trail will follow 104th PL. SE to the dead end. From the dead end the trail will follow the wooded bluff until it reaches a point opposite of Fenster Nature Park. At the alignment of 2nd St. SE the trail will cross at a future bridge location to the west side of the river and into Fenster Nature Park. The trail will continue south through the park and into the King County owned Auburn Narrows area where it will end near the intersection of Auburn Black Diamond Rd. and Green Valley Road. This looped recreational path spurs off the Interurban Trail and will go through the Auburn Off-road Cyclists Auburn Environmental Park. Pedestrians Environment Equestrians, al Park Loop possibly White River The White River Trail runs along the south side of the White River from Roegner Park to the Bicyclists Trail eastern edge of Game Farm Wilderness Park. Future extensions of the trail are planned from Equestrians A Street SE to Roegner Park, across the White River via the future BNSF Railroad underpass, Off-road Cyclists on the south side of the river within the City of Pacific,and from Game Farm Wilderness Park Pedestrians to southeast Auburn along the White River. CA,/pier 3. Nov-.1(1(, .'.d 77nn.rpo t(ti(l) PNrrP 3-I.! ORD.E Page 251 of 751 CITY or Comprehensive Transportation Plan .AUBURN WASHINGTON • Trail Description Potential Name Users Williams These recreational trails are intended to use public or quasi-public lands, including utility Bicyclists Trail corridors. A variety of loop trails may be possible within this large area. Equestrians Off-road Cyclists Pedestrians Bonneville This east-west trail will extend from Lea Hill to Dykstra Park Street,where it will connect to Bicyclists Power Trail downtown Auburn and West Hill via an existing and planned series of bike lanes. There Pedestrians are topographical and environmental challenges that will need to be addressed during the Equestrians design phase. Academy The portion of Academy Drive from SR 164 to Green Valley Road is currently closed due to Bicyclists Trail slope failures. Pedestrians Fru iectrianc_ Lakeland This trail serves the Lakeland community and links Sunset Park and Dorothy Bothell Park via Pedestrians Hills Trail a meandering sidewalk path along Lakeland Hills Way SE. k. This network will provide local and regional connections for a variety of non-motorized modes. The completed portions of the Interurban and Green River Trails connect pedestrians,cyclists, and equestrians to areas north and south of Auburn,while the White River Trail provides for east-west travel.Additional bike lanes and completion of the paved trail network will guide cyclists safely to points of interests and through congested areas of the City. • The establishment of an equestrian district and trails in the southeast portion of the City permits more opportunities for equestrian travel in scenic areas. Pedestrians will be able to travel more safely and comfortably with upgrades and expansion of the sidewalk network,new crossings and street lighting,and better street design near schools and frequently traveled pedestrian locations. The addition of a BNSF undercrossing, just north of the White River and west of A Street SE,will provide safe passage for pedestrians. A new trail connection along C Street SW will provide pedestrians and cyclists with a safer connection to downtown and Auburn Station. • Chapter 3. Non-Motork d T'ran purtation Pn,c 3-15 ORD.E Page 252 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON White River Trail Ory Altol,, White River Trail Multi-Use Path PROMOTING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES The City of Auburn envisions a transportation system that will help promote healthy community principles by coordinating land use, the non-motorized transportation system, and transit in a manner that encourages walking and bicycling.The Puget Sound Regional Council has identified several elements,which contribute to the desirability of walking, bicycling,and transit use.' • Concentrating complementary uses such as restaurants,retail and grocery stores proximate to residences and employment. • Linking neighborhoods by connecting streets,sidewalks,and trails. • Designing for safe and welcoming pedestrian and bicycle facilities. • Enhancing transit opportunities and non-motorized connections to transit facilities. • Reducing and mitigating the effects of parking. These principles, many of which can be promoted by thoughtful transportation systems planning, encourage healthier communities by increasing physical activity and decreasing air pollution caused by vehicle emissions. Auburn has historically planned for a transportation system that incorporates many healthy community principles, such as transit facility planning and regional trail planning. In addition, the Downtown Plan calls for a mixed-use, high density, pedestrian oriented downtown. Improving the non-motorized system also helps address the findings of the citywide Health Impact Assessment process which recommended that the City improve sidewalk connectivity, improve the pedestrian environment, eliminate natural and man-made mobility barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists,improve transit access,improve traffic safety,pedestrian safety and personal security. In the future,Auburn shall continue to promote these principles through long-range planning efforts, capital facility improvements,development review,and community activities involving active lifestyle elements. Vision 2040 Update Issue Paper on Health:What's Health Got to Do with Growth Management,Economic Development and Transportation?,Puget Sound Regional Council,December 2nd,2004. Chapter 3. Noa-Mottaized 7 ranfpoi talion Pare 3-10 ORD.E Page 253 of 751 IN OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS The City has developed policies and identified funding strategies that will help implement the future non-motorized network.They can be found in Chapters 5 and 6,consecutively, of this plan.The planning direction outlined in this chapter shall be used as the foundation for implementing the non-motorized policies and securing funding. • • Chapter 3. Ntin-A1oionizeil Trauspor/ation Page 3-1 ORD.E Page 254 of 751 0 ( .\ a. 11 ..is-. ,.=.-�'^ y�,. , fir, I ! t ,. • I : '1. , .. ...111,',.'' - - •• •- 5 287TH'ST i - " E :11, .17 7 1 :--ilIV•t•J tiliTO,st- -.,...ik . • .:1 , ,....... ,.....:.?. --v4i . Ihkah,. — II l, 167 ��. f' IVwi,,•'r ♦' f i •11 • 1 lc! - `. P • ok '°°"" 4 . . fa � , '. .._„___.: .i...7.•••.. MAMMY 1,ak kill: .x..... •4Z !^ it tom. y i Il + ��G • " y ! ...,.:i ii. • 4.: ----- 5' .r.: f '•E'r r • tk , ..•_, I' . ,i'lL••'At. :Pil'illid71 ' fit.` • . ' �i? Nal M` AR a .��' i. , I- IIS. `aJ. `or':• M►n ,.. - ri:".- .- .:-- , -04 7 ,A6a44:4., 2 711 . 1 PP "E. ...!12 ft , = P - -... / . - '''''*v irflPill:.1 .,,.. h,..... . . '4,. t "Mli TM r•I. t--, .,:n • ..• Wa 'f ' 7-----\.,________________ .,..4. r 4:' i S�4THS s t +'1 s,L wr :I:' - n I 18 :., / 1 .:-,:t A F!lir A.r...141v,-.1 ,i- - . ,... . .. . i a a•••••••• .-- . 4TH ST SW • �'. a■ i�tP1 '� �a�. `► 18 —`�I: Ilam liiiiira,ic,�o i. • hf?,7.-- { .._i '- -4‘1' P.":1F44"I. :,,,,,,v,,,,... • rii l • Hi • 1'1 ' WM. , � 'rte . airk'co„. 1 • -iliiE St‘414 ' ':. : ill - ?11111111Wil 22:g 2 �''$T41 ' - 'iki' ,,,..6..a4 0 marlin 3 ., •-. . . o MMI+ y a•-“.:•• ;••a 3 I / II I . • oils 1 J ______ _________ I__ Wo f,. r; r �Y'l' .r- . .- . .•01'3"-rr- .4. 1# \\ - /T3 r :1;Millrhill74. ' - ST RIVER DR SE 4.-.... _ • 67 I f lfMrr' :Is' ' .. .,_ "�� r 4�HSuT/SE w i\ IV. ti 0;4 4. . IR,. : . : ' '' . u, . ., . \ < > • ..- : I ` i s- ....on, a•IV . ---- kl \' �.. 2ND ST E P n. .:1, I zilp:,1-:,'C''..,..irlt;,4. '5--7111 lit wilil i‘\ 111 111k-1.-' ' 0.1.13?'''...71::;:i;.; ......., 1 qr:c c t I; i'e-:''.344:111;ICA 11 .. ......;,....r--.-•173.� S I 111J / / Monty Future Pedestrian Corridor 1/2 Mile Iron,School Auburn Transportation Nan (31/ r Existing Sidewalks City of Auburn Existing Sidewalks and Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors 0 1 Education FacilitiesOP' Recently Completed Miles di Parks * Protected Crosswalks Map 3-1 ORD.E 1/4Mile from School Page 255 of 751 0 / 1 . 1 t..1 • III t , ,...• • � ,t , I • 1 2 •; 50TH STN` - ■ rfJ y4 I L - J� I SU?R9Nf�sT I • I S 287TH ST I Z 42ND ST NW • 42ND ST NE S 286TH ST : � _ • • ■ ■ �� CE zt78T116T `SF 290TH S 292ND ST ■■■eA■■ unioI■t■■iii■■■ ■ S i ■ ?9sr�T mt■ ■■■■O■■■i■■ _i + ' itii�tiii ■ 167 i• Nrise ■ ■/�■ti r • r U SE 99TH ST 2 55 ■ ■ i �\ 1 J ■ ■ II • U ■ 5 30eH ST 2 I I ■i ■ ■■■ ■: and :8/1•Illull 0�■ id■ ■■ z• > C �J r$■ SE 307TIa ■ ■ NI IN ■ W • ; ■ 2 ■ ` •ID • ■ • �. 1571�T V i�a ■ ■■ arsimi m.l.■■■iJ imillil - ... _ ■ti■ ■j • . : SE 3167H pi v ■■ 7W■ &I l/■■m it■r °� . . �•% > a S 344TH SilitAa Z ti SE 323RD PL 18 ■ o i‘ ��� ; elmah ■ ■ 2�ST 44.1„....4T\--r -HSTSW 110. 1111111M111111/191 M ■ 4TH�rSE J L■■■ 18 ■ ; ti I ch.©�qM STM ST SE ■ Q�#i Iw • im •■ 15TH ST SW "MIN %Minn" • SC • i ••• • (i) E-rc • f I - °� C • v, % 1?SH SS tic, ■ ■ - i i 2 i 2J STSEip \ 11‘t. ■ ■ / ■ t. :▪5TH ST U TH SI E ` � , m 0 • ■ 1� 6 H j _ l■UUi■i♦c. 9L(9 NiY■, NI cJ/ 3 DST STUCK RIVER DR SE—Ws . y� J 51 SI 1 co N irs-rvows / I • ���SE •• 167 �� A15 �� 1 ) ` • ' l <15'. • a�N ST SE •� Oi lila . II P414s illt II w .• yli • x i _ ,I �i•M■■iii■ y I ■■■■.■t t I'i ■■■. 1404" Q I i O I� iliNio•WHST SE /►. -i .,■N�■■■■■ P ' '-N-N \ r;) 2ND ST E I• a F t ■ ST SE t._ '\\ X • m 1 0'44 S� .,l D ST Sk 1 1 4 \ / J • Existing Trailheads •44.i P• Future Bike Facility Parks Auburn Transportation Plan 04"0Existing and Future Bicycle Facilities J I and Multi-Use Trails LiO 1 • Future Trailheads Trail City of Auburn Miles N Bike Facility • • Future Trail• Map 3-2 ORD.E l• Page 256 of 751 • A A A T o To Tu Kent Kent Kent & Seattle I A aTo A ip277THSF-- Kent '!'u Prdlrlr:Yl ill w 50TH S ( 0 T ♦ tient s' r � • DE3 /c° I L \°'s ,�, SE 282ND St � J S 287TH ST �J — Ri it-) 42ND ST NW Z 43RD ST NE wR SE 286TH ST U .-�.� .-.I ■ OLSON x z r` y PARK lu SE 288TH ST • - w w / 5292ND ST —�. 420 N • a r = w e. 1.Y Zr.' Federal1 . t`6�' yt 2 AUBURN / ))'a y GOLF w SE 299TH ST in coma) z RMNNAN 7 /^�V�/���_� PAR /S 305TH ST = eS 1-\_104.1 rH ST w I'u > ::11 I;-' z orOnly ri w 1/7 �Pacific OJo ,VJQpOSIQItaC'ew8VY I- �' z2QST 7 NESE307Th PL = I Ito a SIL D 1 m PACIFIC RACEWAYS a w D Chas a„�` To Zco �cFOc SE 316TH ST CO Ts Z Federal AueuRN UUJ BTHSTNE y : :: SNTAL 324TH ST E GR� Diamond CC • 019 • S IIIc 7Q. � I AVBURN ' : . 2ND ST S' DOWNTOWN \,-1 jtTHSTSWST SE r7 A4 SEL. CK OlA --_____ii y e'' Col's, LQ Mf�NDRDSE� � UP'.WALL 60 E 15TH ST SW M--� carr °.H: t,° SCEHi I 0 P• 0 C' r ® 7TH ST SE 166 cn ► w qtr MUCNLES1I00T � CASINO � fiL � E 23RD ST SE 1 IP c0 KING COUNTY , F w . 25TH ST E r I - I'o a / Falyo Flaming W 1 • ° 4,Lc ALGON,� _ 29TH ST SE a,, �St Geyser t ¢Q l GAME r `ARRM STUCK RIVER DR SE li w r S. 5PAy w CO W s I �, 9 F 0 351kA 1uek 1'.II 11.L.M LY IY LI b.. II mcy,s 4,, (i 67. N5�' 1 T0 4' ''',1,..,, II" �� ttl 4j7.HSTSE O o n 4 5NS,1 ST r ` w W PACIFIC \. I- 0 u. 1-1 S6TH ST SE \\N. >'-.gSE Tit 6 Stilton N 2NDSTE r- `)Ilk {.,M = 62ND ST SE \ 64TH ST se LAKELAIIU IIILLS COMMERCIAL ANCA To EDGEWOOD I 72ND Bonne} Lake SUMNER J To To Sumner Sumner & To & Bonney Tacoma Puyallup Lake V V v. \/ Connectors `J��� Focus Area0 Auburn Transportation Plan Bicycle Corridors and Connectors ^/ Corridors 0 1 IINCI • , N0. Interurban Trail Miles ORD.E ej— City of Auburn Page 257 of 751 Map 3-3 AtIY1BURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASH INC;ION • CHAPTER 4 TRANSIT ~ Transit service is a key component of Auburn's transportation system, providing mobility within the .---- ' •.....�'_ City and access to and from the City. Unlike the n. street and non-motorized systems, Auburn does not . '' .,.�`. directly administer transit service. Rather, the City works with local transit agencies to coordinate • service in Auburn. The transit agencies are publicly �'- funded and are responsible for providing transit service within their service boundaries. Auburn Station Today, Auburn is served by local and regional bus, as well as a commuter rail line that runs between Seattle and Tacoma/Lakewood. 4.1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES The following section provides a brief summary of the public transportation services offered in Auburn. Existing transit service for the Auburn area is identified in Map 4-1 at the end of this section. KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT Bus Service Metro Transit provides local bus services linking destinations within the community and providing regional connections to the Auburn Station and the 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride. Metro Transit offers the following services in Auburn: Route 154 provides weekday service between the Auburn Station, the 15th Street NW Park-and- Ride, the Kent Station, Boeing in Kent, the Tukwila Park-and-Ride, Boeing Field, and the Federal Center South in Seattle. Route 164 provides regional service between Kent, Auburn and the Green River College. It connects with the Route 181 at Green River College. Route 180 provides service daily between southeast Auburn, Auburn Station, and Kent Station, connecting to Route 150, with service to Seattle. Route 180 also serves Sea-Tac Airport and the - , . Burien Transit Center. • Route 181 provides daily service between the Twin Lakes Park-and-Ride, Sea-Tac Mall, Federal Way � Transit Center, the Outlet Collection, Auburn 4. /if • got — Station,and Green River College. '*.141 Route 186 provides weekday peak hour service between the Auburn Station and Enumclaw via • C Page4- 1 ORD.E Metro Transit Hybrid Articulated Bus Page 258 of 751 Courtesy:Metro Transit AMY Of Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING ION Auburn Way South. The service is scheduled to meet Sounder Commuter Rail trains at the Auburn Station. Route 915 provides weekday midday service and some weekend service between the Auburn Station and Enumclaw via Auburn Way South. The route also includes a small portion of Dial a Ride Transit(DART) service with limited,variable routing in response to rider requests. Route 917 provides weekday and Saturday service between A Street SE, 41st Street SE, Algona, the Outlet Collection, and the Auburn Station. Peak hour weekday service is also provided between the Auburn Station and the Social Security Administration and the General Services Administration (GSA). The route offers DART service (limited variable route) in portions of Pacific. Route 952 is a weekday AM and PM peak hour route specifically designed to serve the Boeing Everett facility.It operates from the 15th Street NW Park and Ride to the Boeing Everett Plant. Route 910 is a DART route which was inaugurated in October 2010 in a partnership between Auburn and King County Metro Transit, and functions as a community shuttle circulator service. The route provides weekday and Saturday service between north central Auburn, the I Street NE corridor,downtown Auburn and the Outlet Collection/YMCA on 15th Street SW. Due to financially driven cuts by Metro Transit, Route 919 was recently discontinued. This was a community focused route, which operated fixed route and some dial a ride service between downtown Auburn, the Library, Senior Center, Les Gove Park and southeast Auburn in the Dogwood area where it interchanged with the Muckleshoot Tribal Shuttle. Although service to the area is still available on the Routes 186 and 915, Route 919 operated during the off-peak hours filling gaps in the service offered by the Routes 186 and 915. ACCESS ACCESS Transportation is a King County Metro paratransit service, providing door-to-door, shared-ride van transportation within most of King County. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires curb-to-curb paratransit service for persons whose disabilities prevent use of accessible non-commuter, fixed route bus service. This service is intended to offer a comparable level of service to that provided by regular bus service. --'111111111114: ,� lik14im Vanpool Services �1 .. A " '�-mail 10,— Metro Transit sponsors vanpool services that serve '"'=~ residents and employees in Auburn. Vanpool is a - shared-ride service that provides group transport for i d .. , commuters with proximate origins and destinations. - ,--• � Vanpool is a popular and flexible service that `a ' DART.,.. . provides commuters with an alternative to driving alone and fixed-route transit service. Vanpool will • 'h, continue to be an important strategy for mitigating - -- __ peak period congestion throughout Auburn and the region. DART Vehicle Courtesy:City of Kent Chayer 4. 1 ra»si/ Page 4-2 ORD.E Page 259 of 751 A'[JBURN FComprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON • Metro Transit Facilities Metro Transit owns and operates the Auburn 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride with 244 surface parking stalls. Metro also operates into the Auburn Station managed by Sound Transit. Additionally, Metro maintains approximately 177 other bus stops in Auburn, 42 of which contain passenger shelters. Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Under state law, the City is required to administer a Commute Trip Reduction program for all employers in Auburn with at least 100 employees arriving during the peak morning commute hours. The City of Auburn contracts with Metro Transit to provide CTR support services for the CTR affected local employers. Currently, there are 10 CTR employers in Auburn with a total of 5,500 employees. Metro Transit assists employers in complying with state law by providing rideshare support and a host of other incentives aimed at reducing single occupant vehicle travel. PIERCE TRANSIT Route 497 is operated by Pierce Transit in partnership with the City of Auburn,and King County Metro Transit. It operates peak hour weekday service between Lakeland Hills and the Auburn Station. As a morning and evening service meeting Sounder trains the 497 is a commuter - oriented route, but is open to all riders. In the future, the City hopes to expand the Route 497 to serve all peak hour Sounder trips. Because Route 497 primarily serves Sounder passengers and because it significantly reduces the demand for commuter parking at the Auburn Station parking garage managed by Sound Transit the city is seeking financial participation from Sound Transit in • operating this route and making this a permanent route. Vanpool Services are provided by Pierce Transit similar to those offered by King County Metro Transit. SOUND TRANSIT 36.411r Sound Transit is the regional transit provider for *:1 � `�" Puget Sound. It provides limited stop, transit l":41;•~40,, services linking Auburn to major regional M destinations in King and Pierce Counties. The 1 agency offers both Sounder commuter rail and -r- regional express bus services in Auburn. Sounder Commuter Rail Sound Transit operates the Sounder commuter rail Sounder Train service on the Lakewood-Tacoma — Seattle route Courtesy:Sound Transit via the BNSF Railway. Sound Transit provides weekday peak hour trips northbound to Seattle in Ea the AM and southbound from Seattle to Tacoma Lakewood in the PM. Reverse direction trips are % - also provided in each peak hour with mid-day service being planned for future years. Some • Chapter 4. Iiansd ORD.E Sound Transit Regional Express B sage 60 of 751 Courtesy:Sound Transit Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING ION connections are available between south line Sounder trains which terminate in Seattle and north line Sounder trains from Everett to Seattle. Additional special event service to and from Seattle for Mariners, Seahawks and Sounders games and the Emerald Downs racetrack in Auburn is offered on some weekends. Currently, eight trains operate northbound to Seattle in the morning peak and return southbound during the PM peak. Two trains operate southbound to Tacoma/Lakewood in the morning and northbound to Seattle in the early evening. Regional Express Bus Service Route 566/567 offers daily weekday, limited stop service between the Auburn Station the Kent Station, the Renton Transit Center,the Bellevue Transit Center,and the Overlake Transit Center. Route 577/578 offers daily limited stop service between Puyallup, Sumner, Auburn, Federal Way and Seattle. The 577 provides service between the Federal Way Transit Center and Seattle during the peak periods when the Sounder trains are in operation. The 578 provides service between Puyallup and Seattle during the off-peak hours when train service is not currently provided. Transit Facilities Sound Transit owns and operates the Auburn Station located in downtown Auburn. This full service multi-modal facility provides parking for a total of 633 vehicles in a 6-story parking garage and a surface parking lot. The facility currently handles approximately 470 daily bus trips. Approximately 3,000 passengers ride bus service to/from the station on a daily basis. Boardings at Auburn on Sounder commuter rail are 1,300 per day.The facility draws numerous transit riders from outside Auburn including many from outside the Sound Transit taxing District, the geographic area where residents contribute tax revenue to fund Sound Transit. Chapter 4. Transit Page 4-4 ORD.E Page 261 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN• 4.2 Transit User Needs DEMOGRAPHICS People use public transportation for two reasons: because they have to ride or because they choose to ride. Carrying the choice rider, such as commuters, often has the greatest positive impact on the transportation system by helping control peak hour traffic demand. But providing a"safety net" of adequate transportation to those who absolutely depend on it is,arguably,public transportation's most important role. There are a number of ways to identify "transit dependency" but the most effective way is to identify locations with high concentrations of residents who have no vehicle available in their household. An examination of the most recent year 2000 Census data available from the Bureau of the Census shows that some areas of Auburn have a surprisingly high number of households with no vehicle available. This remains the most recent information available with the level of detail necessary to identify needs on a block level. As a comparison baseline, 9 percent of Auburn households have no vehicle available; this percentage is consistent with that of King County (9 percent) and slightly higher than that of Pierce County (8 percent). For the purpose of this analysis,block groups with significant concentrations of residential development in which over 12 percent of households have no vehicle available are considered transit dependent areas. There are eleven census block groups in Auburn in which over 12 percent of households have no vehicle available, nine of which have significant concentrations of residential development and are therefore identified as transit dependent areas. It is also notable that four of the nine block • groups with large concentrations of residential development have at least 20 percent of households with no vehicle available. The nine block groups comprising the transit dependent areas had a total of 3,698 households in 2000, 771 (21 percent) of which had no vehicle available. Map 4-2 shows the transit dependent areas and overlays the existing transit service in order to identify if adequate transit service is available to these highly transit dependent neighborhoods. Comparing the neighborhoods in question to the transit route structure, it is apparent that the vast majority of Auburn's most transit dependent population lives within 1/4 miles of a fixed route bus — the distance standard most often identified by the transit industry as a reasonable walking distance to transit. An exception to that rule is the area near Dogwood Street SE north of Auburn Way South where many of the transit dependent residents are located more than 1/4 mile from fixed route bus service. In the future,it will be critical to ensure these areas continue to be well covered by transit service, both in terms of route and schedule coverage. SERVICE COVERAGE Generally speaking, local transit service coverage in Auburn is well planned and well operated. Even so there are some areas of the community that do not have adequate local service coverage, as well as some important regional bus links and commuter rail services that have yet to be fully developed. Local Bus Service • Chapter 4. Transit t- ORD.E Page 262 of 751 CFFYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan Ate B WASHINGTON Some of Auburn's most populated neighborhoods are deficient in local bus service, including the West Hill, Lakeland Hills during the non-peak hours, and parts of east and north Auburn. The least served residential area of Auburn is West Hill, an area with approximately 5,000 residents with no transit service. Lakeland Hills, a planned residential community with approximately 3,800 homes has peak hour service to downtown Auburn but lacks all day service. Lea Hill, a predominantly residential community on Auburn's east hill, does have two transit routes, which predominantly serve Green River College, leaving a large portion of the residents unable to walk to a transit route. In 2014, a license plate survey of the Auburn Station garage indicated a substantial number of Lea Hill residents utilize transit service at Auburn Station. This suggests that a commuter oriented shuttle serving Lea Hill, similar to the Route 497 shuttle implemented in Lakeland Hills, could be successful. Additionally, residential areas of east Auburn, east of M Street NE and south of 8th Street NE, and parts of northeast Auburn, east of I Street NE, are also located more than '/a mile from fixed route bus service. It is difficult for these areas to access transit, both for local and regional trips. The design of King County Metro's local bus routes in Auburn should be reviewed in relation to future changes in Sound Transit's Sounder commuter rail and regional express bus services to identify opportunities and priorities for productive improvements to transit coverage, frequency, and hours of operation. Regional Bus Service The most important unmet regional transit need is for all day, express bus and commuter rail service between Auburn,Tacoma/Lakewood and Seattle. While the original Sound Transit Regional Express Bus Service Plan contained a direct link between Auburn and Tacoma/Lakewood, the connection was discontinued in Sound Transit's later service plans. Sounder Commuter Rail Sounder Commuter Rail, a highly popular and attractive service, operates bi-directionally in the peak periods. Most of the trips are operated in the peak direction; northbound during the weekday AM peak and southbound during the weekday PM peak. No midday, evening or weekend 4 ' � regular service is currently provided. These services are needed as is additional capacity on some of the currently most popular runs. Intercity Passenger Rail Auburn is an ideal location for a future stop on the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor, which runs Auburn YMCA -Major trip generator from Vancouver, BC to Eugene, OR. A former intercity passenger rail stop and Amtrak city,Auburn is centrally located in South King County at the intersection of SR-18 and SR-167 and is a 10 minute drive from I-5. The Auburn Station is the only facility in King or Pierce County with direct freeway access and currently serves over 3,000 bus passengers and 1,300 commuter rail passengers and is centrally located within 10 miles Chapter 4. Transit Page 4-6 ORD.E Page 263 of 751 CITY or Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURJ WASHINGTON 41111 of 500,000 people. Amtrak should implement more intercity rail stations in the high density and traffic congested areas of Puget Sound such as at Auburn Station. A new Auburn stop would have great ridership benefits since it is at a station with available overnight parking and is in close proximity to hundreds of thousands of potential new customers. Furthermore the projected schedule impacts of a stop in Auburn could be largely absorbed in the overall route schedule. TRANSIT SCHEDULING The scheduling of transit service is often as important as route alignment and coverage in determining the success of the service. Scheduling to Successfully Serve Employers One of the most overlooked aspects of transit system design is scheduled transit arrival times versus major employer shift times. While a transit system can physically serve the front door of a business, its actual scheduled arrival times will often determine if anyone rides the system. It is not the intention of this effort to conduct an exhaustive employer shift time analysis of the community. However, an example of the challenge can be found in examining one of Auburn's major employers, the Boeing Company with over 6,000 employees. The company's primary morning shift time arrival occurs at 6 AM, the earliest southbound Sounder train from Seattle, arrives in Auburn at 6:41 A.M.The first run of the day for the Metro Route 181 from Federal Way and Lea Hill arrive near Boeing at approximately 6 AM, making it difficult for employees to meet the shift time. The first runs of the Route 917 which serve the nearby GSA and SSA offices arrive after the Boeing shift time as well. None of the existing bus routes stop close enough to the • Boeing facility to allow employees to walk to the facility.This shows how it would be beneficial to coordinate with major employers to offer alternate transit options that can meet various shift times such as dedicated Vanpools or Vanshares. The lack of transit schedule synchronization with key employers in a community can also negatively impact other opportunities. The City of Auburn in partnership with Metro Transit was the first agency in Puget Sound to create the concept of'Van Share', a specialized transit service in which vanpools carry employees to their employer's front door from regional transit centers. Where the schedules work, such as in providing a direct link between Boeing's Renton facilities and the Tukwila Station,the concept has been highly successful. On the other end of the trip, the Van Share concept can be successfully implemented to transport employees between their homes and the Transit Station, saving capacity on the roadway and at the Auburn Station parking facilities. Due to the fact that Auburn's major employer shift times sometimes don't match Sounder and regional bus transit arrival times, Van Share has not yet achieved its full potential in Auburn. However as Sounder and bus service to the Auburn Station increase this option may become more viable for major employers in Auburn. To maximize the investment in public transit service in Auburn, it is recommended that both Sound Transit and Metro Transit conduct an evaluation of their schedules with a focus on improving service to major employers in the Auburn area. • Chapter 4. --Transit Pine 4-7 ORD.E Page 264 of 751 • CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN vvA\FIINGTON Transit Capacity A second consideration in scheduling service is ensuring that enough service is available to meet the demand. Sounder Commuter Rail has also been immensely popular, indicating that increased service is supported by the ridership demand. Daily Sounder hoardings at south end stations total around 6,000 riders, the equivalent of a lane of traffic on SR 167 or I-5, emphasizing the importance of expanding Sounder service. The Auburn Station is a highly successful component of the Sounder service. Total rail boardings at the Auburn Station today average over 1,300 riders per day making Auburn one of the busiest stations on the Sounder route. URBAN DESIGN The design of the build environment has direct implications on the quality and availability of transit service. Urban design can either encourage or inhibit the provision of local transit service. Some inhibitors to providing neighborhood service include inadequate street geometry and construction, lack of a satisfactory location for a terminal at the end of the route, absence of a street grid that could be used to turn around a bus, and the absence of a connected sidewalk network. Ideally, new residential developments should be laid out with future transit route alignments in mind and supporting transit facilities. Likewise, retrofits of the existing street network should accommodate transit design considerations. IMPROVING LOCAL SERVICE Preserving the Route 910 Since 2010 Auburn and Metro Transit have partnered through the Transit Now initiative to implement community shuttle circulator service. The Route 910 shuttle serves Northeast Auburn commercial and activity areas. The service has become steadily more popular, doubling in productivity since its inception. This partnership route between, Auburn and King County Metro has now been extended until 2020. Add Service to Replace the Terminated Route 919 Currently, a planned expansion of service to the Metro Route 915 is expected to begin in March 2016. This will increase service to hourly, midday on some of the alignment of the former Route 919. The city should continue to look for opportunities to improve service along the route of the former 919. Preserve and Expand Commuter Connection Bus Routes Auburn should work with Pierce Transit, Metro Transit and Sound Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet all existing and future Sounder trains and to encourage Sound Transit to fund a portion of the Route 497. Auburn should explore the concept with Metro Transit and Sound Transit of adding a new commuter bus service to Sounder from Lea Hill and the west hill of Auburn and encourage Sound Transit to fund a portion of the routes. Similar to the Route 497, these routes would be Chapter 4. 7"ran.nt Page 4-8 ORD.E Page 265 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON timed to meet Sounder trains and operate on a direct route and express schedule after leaving the Lea Hill or west hill areas. TRANSIT FACILITIES One type of transit facility improvement stands out as the most important ongoing need: parking. Comparing the number of current Sounder daily boardings (1,300) to the available number of parking stalls at the Auburn Station (633) and the number of passengers who transfer daily from bus to Sounder (approximately 150) shows there is a lack of parking for Sounder at the Auburn Station. Additional train trips are currently being planned, including three new round trips, and these will attract more ridership (and result in more parking needs) in downtown Auburn. Although there is always a desire to have as many people as possible access commuter rail without parking,the reality of the service is that it is usually used by customers who want to start and end their day with a direct, fast trip to and from the station. Only the Route 497 is specifically designed to link commuters to Sounder. It accounts for the majority of transfers between bus service and rail service. Given the strength of the demand for Sounder and the location of many of its users, other lifestyle choices (bike, pedestrian or TOD) will also not be sufficient to ultimately negate the continued demand for more parking. So, for the foreseeable future, parking will be a continuing challenge at the Auburn Station and even more will be needed as three more Sounder roundtrips are added, as scheduled in 2016 and 2017. • Building the infrastructure to accommodate commuter parking demand is an essential component of making transit an attractive option for commuters. In order to do so, action is essential to clearly identify the future demand and acquire the land needed to build the parking. The plans created in ST2 and ST3 (ST2 is the Sound Transit Plan approved by voters during 2008, ST3 is a proposed ballot measure for voters to consider in 2016) to build parking should be followed. If this is not done, neighborhoods within walking distance of Auburn Station, particularly those bordering W Main Street, will experience an increase in on-street commuter parking, making it difficult for residents to find parking during the day and early evening. To combat this issue, the City has established a restricted parking zone for residents to the west of C Street NW, however the problem may begin in other locations. Sound Transit should also examine the usage of the Auburn Station garage by people who live outside the Sound Transit Taxing District. The agency should consider requiring those users to pay to park in the Auburn Station garage. In a 2014 survey of the vehicles parked at the Auburn facility over 90 vehicles (15 percent of the parking supply)were registered at addresses outside the Sound Transit Taxing District. King County Metro Transit is responsible for installing new and maintaining existing bus shelters in Auburn. Both the City and agency should continue to prioritize potential improvements to shelters, benches, pads, bus zones, customer information and pedestrian access. Currently, about 20 Metro bus stops that meet warrants for the installation of shelters have not received them yet and City staff is focused on working with Metro to accomplish that installation. Pedestrian improvements around existing or planned transit stops, including enhanced crosswalks and pedestrian refuges, should also be examined by the City.The placement of bus stops is driven • Chapter 4. Transit Page 4-9 ORD.E Page 266 of 751 CITY 01 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON by a variety of criteria including transit system operating and design standards, professional engi- neering field evaluation, and public input. 4.3 Transit System Recommendations This section contains the recommendations derived from the transit needs assessment, as discussed in the first part of this chapter. Recommendations are organized by lead agency, with the understanding that implementation of any major system improvement will require the collaboration of many agencies. KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT Maintain the operation of the Route 910 in partnership with Metro Transit. Explore partnering with Metro Transit and the Muckleshoot Indian tribe to create a new route combining the best features of the former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shuttle to provide better transit service to the city and the Reservation. Work with Metro Transit to create new, limited stop AM and PM peak transit services designed for commuters from Lea Hill and west hill to and from the downtown Auburn Station. Conduct an evaluation of transit schedules;improve service to major employers. Work with Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains. Explore, assist and encourage the implementation of commuter Vanpool and Van Share linking Boeing to the Auburn Station.To meet Sounder and Regional bus routes. Work with Sound Transit and Metro Transit to create additional parking at or near the Auburn Station. PIERCE TRANSIT Work with Pierce Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains. SOUND TRANSIT Work with Sound Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains and fund a portion of the Route. Work with Sound Transit to add new commuter bus service to the Sounder from Lea Hill and West Hill and fund a portion of the routes. Institute midday Sounder service to and from Tacoma/Lakewood and Seattle and plan for evening and weekend service in the near future. Address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Station due to the use of the overcrowded Sounder parking facility by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound Transit taxing district and pay nothing for the facility. Begin working with the City of Auburn to create additional parking near the Auburn Station, as specified in ST2 and included in ST3,which is scheduled to be on the November 2016 ballot. CITY OF AUBURN Continue the operation of the Route 910 in partnership with Metro Transit. Chapter 4. Transit Page 4- 10 ORD.E Page 267 of 751 ITYOf Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Explore partnering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to create a new route combining the best features of the former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shuttle to provide better transit service to the City and the Reservation. Work with Metro Transit and Sound Transit to create a new, limited stop AM and PM peak transit service for commuters from Lea Hill and west hill to and from the Auburn Station. Work with Pierce Transit and Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains and encourage Sound Transit to fund a portion of the Route 497 to continue the route in service for multiple years beyond 2016. Work with Sound Transit to address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Station due to the use of the overcrowded Sounder parking facility by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound Transit taxing district and pay nothing for the facility. Begin working with Sound Transit and Metro Transit in partnership to create additional commuter parking at or near the Auburn Station. Chapter 4. Transit .Pa c 4- 11 ORD.E Page 268 of 751 i lily .4181N11, It wI ►t cJ C 277TH ICT— = 50TH ST NE/ 1 Gj41 L I S 0891u0 ST • S 287TH ST IN+ 42ND ST NW 42ND ST NE I. SE 286TH ST 2 SE 290TH ST IC enw S 292ND$T37TH ST NW �� 4` ` a 180 CI h0 S� Z y ® f3. ?9STH ST y 4® Csl Ni Cr' ILl 167 z e`- a LN.c) co li 02 SE 299TH ST m P S 305TH ST _ ® t,., 910 z b \ HST //) J [-] 1, V) co > +~ ki cn = SE 307Th�L a -J Iw z �' -1 cc Z wz Q SE 312TH S co NIP h� 0) Fii ®u 6TH ST/I- "^r"^r w W Q i...11 S 324TH ST ti w SE 323RD PL m, z o CI O W MAIN ST ^ �� y 2ND S\\:34 S .• • a �— i cm ST SW • . 4TH ST SE ® .I 8, w gUe�RN B C 910 8 H ST k D1gMQNO.RD-SrT• _OilN T; 00 / , _I . . .1. MIT 51 a s Shuttle 186/915, / i• 221RID ST SE ,, UJ • 4 S m180 ST SE y I-d e• 26TH ST SEL-16 D l 1- C ��YDR ` w --� �iWfiifi1 > SE l � J w STUCK RIVER DR SE 0 O � 361stS 35TH`NAY SE • m I U SE 5� q1 167 eo I ,Qq- �o „ti `` = 04� ¢�� 4jTh ST SE w \co s w �yh,,1r a 5�`'I SS 3Fw ccw w ti O 66TH ST SE -+ g N m2ND ST E P a Ig ® 62ND ST SE I �II m 64114 SI 3t 65TH ST S ' i•AK I DsTSe I 1 * Auburn Transit Station / \/ Metro Transit Routes Auburn Transportation Plan 0 • Auburn Transit Routes Park&Ride ^/ Pierce Transit Routes and MIT Shuttle Route 0 1 G City of Auburn / V Sound Transit Routes Miles .%. s • Muckleshoot Shuttle Routes Md 4-1 ORD.E Page 269 of 751 P • i -.11111\111ftp ( tL.Nr r J i S 277TI I ST , J co 50TH SS NE ...,.....\„. p ` y� L f — ( J� SE 282ND S S, aR�tin cr J — '(�P 0 S 287TH ST 42ND ST NW 42ND ST NE SE 286TH ST l z SE 290TH ST 4 ul 5,292ND ST w c _ 11.1 a 37TH ST NW = o 180 • tc.p S. f M 02co y � �SrH ST W X- (167; 3 z ,2' SE 299TH ST > c w ® 910 oa��� w S HST Q tT i• -Jj co R' W w iti z S > > = SE 307T1-IPL = r- H c i W N O W ' M _ W z w > SE 312TH S Cl) z Q w r S 324TH ST ! SE 323RD PLlietirio7.. . w I'' —1\ '.7'' wok 4..:-,, 1 2ND ` J �� w AUeUR1Y B co E ._ Cit-DIAMOND RD SE.�• 910 g Ls ------ :t SCE H�cO I= MIT Or N - Shuttle / 1861915 / / *♦ 22ND ST SE w +� ♦�� m 180ST SE I- 4 S* 26TH ST SE 4,-,,M w tx U co '�YaRSE li ffil � L 3. STUCK RIVER DR SE 5 N y 5� 35T1AWAY il w 5�SE p,`c2 II 167, �4. mx% O co 4- m �N MI 4r-141 ST SE y — 0 �1. ts (c)... w lygY >¢ 5N51 SI SE wy W Q co IS6TH ST SE �l t ce ce IE2ND ST E MI { 62ND ST SE I I 64-0-1/4 SI SE 65TH STS 1 L LAK I D ST S�-- I J Auburn Transit Station "* Metro Transit Routes ^ Auburn Transportation Plan Auburn Transit Routes 4911 • Park Si Ride I \l� Rene Transit Routes and Transit Dependent Areas 0 1 f City of Auburn /` , Sound Transit Routes Miles di Transit Dependent Areas ,•�*`/ ,; AWckleshoot Shuttle Routes Map 4-2 ORD.E Page 270 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON . _,Rrt , .c CHAPTER S. t I ,,r - POLICIES Transportation objectives and policies . establish the framework for realizing the City's vision of its transportation system. Policies provide guidance for Public Art on West Main Street the City, other governmental entities and private developers, enabling the City to achieve its goal in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The policy framework presented below is a guideline, which the City will use to evaluate individual projects and address its infrastructure needs. • The objectives and policies are organized according to five broad headings. The first heading, Coordination, Planning and Implementation, addresses the system comprehensively, detailing policies that pertain to the planning and implementation of the system as a whole. The subsequent four headings list policies specific to the following systems: Street system, Non-motorized system, Transit system, and Air transportation. The analysis of the transportation system, as well as any individual proposals, shall consider all modes of transportation and all methods of efficiently managing the network. • C'hapier S. 1'nitae.r Page 5- 1 ORD.E Page 271 of 751 AO'BURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON GOAL • To plan, expand, and improve the transportation system in cooperation and coordination with adjacent and regional jurisdictions to ensure concurrency compliance with the growth management act, and to provide a safe and efficent multimodal system that meets the community needs and facilitates the land use plan. 5.1 Coordination, Planning and Implementation OBJECTIVE: COORDINATION To be consistent with regional plans and the plans of neighboring cities, to encourage partnerships, and not to unreasonably preclude an adjacent jurisdiction from implementing its planned improvements. POLICIES: Coord-01: Coordinate transportation operations, planning and improvements with other transportation authorities and governmental entities (cities, counties, tribes, state, federal) to address transportation issues. These include: • Improvement of the state highway network through strong advocacy with state officials, both elected and staff, for improvements to state highways and interchanges; • Improvements to roadways connecting Auburn to the surrounding region,including SR 167, SR 18,SR 181/West Valley Hwy,SR 164, and S 277th Street; • Improved access to the Interstate 5 corridor and regional employment centers; • Transit connections to the Regional Growth Centers; • Establishing the Auburn Station as a center for multi-modal transportation connections to proposed future intercity rail service; • Strong advocacy with US congressional members to provide funding to mitigate transportation problems connected to interstate commerce;and • Proactively pursuing forums to coordinate transportation project priorities among other governmental entities, including proposed future intercity rail service. Chapter 5. Policies Pa;, 5- ORD.E Page 272 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • OBJECTIVE: LONG-RANGE PLANNING & PROGRAMMING To continue to plan for the future of the multi-modal transportation system through long-range planning, programmatic planning, and financial planning, in compliance with the Growth Management Act. POLICIES: Plan-0l: The Comprehensive Transportation Plan shall be evaluated and amended annually to ensure it is technically accurate, consistent with state, regional, and other local plans, and in keeping with the City's vision of the future transportation system. Plan-02: The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) shall be updated annually to reevaluate project priorities, develop a plan to fund capital improvement projects, and ensure consistency between project priorities and financing plans. Project evaluation criteria shall foster economic development, maximize utilization of city financing to match transportation grants, promote safety, integrate planning of other projects requiring disturbance of pavements, promote mobility, and optimize the utilization of existing infrastructure. • OBJECTIVE: SAFETY To provide a transportation system that is safe for all users. POLICIES: Safety-01: A safe and efficient transportation system shall be prioritized over driving convenience. Safety-02: Utilize education to increase awareness of existing traffic laws and safety issues, especially as they relate to pedestrians and bicyclists. Safety-03: Engage the community in transportation issues through public involvement and partnerships with organizations such as the Auburn School District. Safety-04: Identify areas with persistent traffic violations and address these violations, in part, through Police Department enforcement. Safety-05: Emphasize enforcement of the "rules of the road" for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists whose actions endanger others. Conduct Chapter T. Policies Pari-.3 ORD.E Page 273 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON enforcement in a manner that reinforces the messages found in non- motorized education & safety programs. Safety-06: Recognize the potential effects of hazards on transportation facilities and incorporate such considerations into the planning and design of transportation projects, where feasible. OBJECTIVE: CONNECTIVITY To provide a highly interconnected network of streets and trails for ease and variety of travel. POLICIES: Connect-01: An efficient transportation system seeks to spread vehicle movements over a series of planned streets. The goal of the system is to encourage connectivity while preventing unacceptably high traffic volumes on any one street. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate access for emergency vehicles. For these reasons the City will continue to plan a series of collectors and arterials designed to national standards to provide efficient service to the community. Connect-02: Encourage the use of trails and other connections that provide ease of travel within and between neighborhoods, community activity centers, and transit services. Development patterns that block direct pedestrian access are discouraged. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate non-motorized transportation on arterials, collectors, and local roads. OBJECTIVE: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Minimize the environmental impacts of all new transportation projects and transportation related improvements. POLICIES: Environ-01: Thoroughly evaluate the impacts of all transportation projects and apply appropriate mitigation measures in conformance with SEPA, the Critical Areas Ordinance, and other city, county, state, and federal regulations. Cove .5.Polities f) ORD.E Page 274 of 751 ITYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASH INGTON Environ-02: Identifyand consider the environmental impacts of P transportation projects at the earliest possible time to ensure planning and decisions reflect environmental values, to avoid delays later in the process, and to reduce or avoid potential problems that may adversely impact the environment and project outcome. Environ-03: Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID), green technology, and sustainability practices into transportation improvements as primary alternatives whenever feasible. Environ-04: Support efforts to improve air quality throughout the Auburn area and develop a transportation system compatible with the goals of the Federal and State Clean Air Acts. Environ-05: Require air quality studies of future major development to assess impacts created by site generated traffic. OBJECTIVE: LEVEL-OF-SERVICE (LOS) THRESHOLD To ensure that new development does not degrade transportation facilities to below LOS standards. • POLICIES: LOS-01: New development shall not be allowed when the impacts of the new development on the transportation system degrades the LOS to below the adopted LOS standard, unless the impacts are mitigated concurrent with the development as described in Chapter 2. LOS-02: The term "below level-of-service" shall apply to situations where traffic attributed to a development likely results in any of the following. a. An unacceptable increase in hazard or an unacceptable decrease in safety at an intersection or on a roadway segment. b. An accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements that can reasonably result in accelerated deterioration of the street pavement. 41111 Chipier S. Policies Page i- ORD.E Page 275 of 751 Cry°, Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON c. An unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an intersection where two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector network. d. An increase in congestion which constitutes an unacceptable adverse environmental impact under the State Environmental Policy Act. e. An increase in queuing that causes blocking of adjacent land uses or intersections. f. A reduction in any of the four (4) LOS standards below. 1. Arterial and Collector Corridor LOS: The level-of-service standard for each arterial and collector corridor is "D", unless otherwise specified in Chapter 2 of this plan. The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine a shorter or longer corridor segment than is specified in Chapter 2, to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 2. Signalized Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for signalized intersections is "D", with the following exceptions; for signalized intersections of two Arterial roads the level-of-service standard during the AM and PM peak periods is "E" for a maximum duration of 30 minutes and for signalized intersections of two Principal Arterial roads the level- of-service standard during the AM and PM peak periods is "E" for a maximum duration of 60 minutes. The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine individual signalized or roundabout intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 3. Two-Way and All-Way Stop Controlled Intersection LOS: The level-of- service standard for two-way stop controlled and all-way stop controlled intersections, is "D". If LOS falls below the standard, analysis and mitigation may be required in a manner commensurate with the associated impacts. This may include, among other requirements, conducting a traffic signal warrant analysis and installing or financing a signal or roundabout. Chaplet% Politic Pair.y-6 ORD.E Page 276 of 751 AITBuRN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON • 4. Roundabout Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for roundabout controlled intersections is "D". The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine to examine roundabout intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. LOS-03: Establish a multi-modal level-of-service system in the future. LOS-04: PM level of service is the city standard. AM level of service may need to be analyzed in situations where specialized conditions exist that disproportionately impact AM traffic. OBJECTIVE: CONCURRENCY To ensure transportation facilities do not fall below the adopted level-of-service standard, as required by the Growth Management Act. POLICIES: GMA-01: Require developments to construct or finance transportation improvements and/or implement strategies that mitigate the impacts of • new development concurrent with (within 6 years of) development, as required by the Growth Management Act. GMA-02: New development that lowers a facility's level-of-service standard below the locally adopted minimum standard shall be denied, as required by the Growth Management Act. Strategies that may allow a development to proceed include, but are not limited to: • Reducing the scope of a project (e.g.platting fewer lots or building less square footage); • Building or financing new transportation improvements concurrent with(within 6 years of) development; • Phasing/delaying a project; • Requiring the development to incorporate Transportation Demand Management strategies;or • Lowering level-of-service standards. GMA-03: The denial of development in order to maintain concurrency may be grounds for declaring an emergency for the purpose of amending the Comprehensive Plan outside of the annual amendment cycle. • Chapter 5. Polices Page i-7 ORD.E Page 277 of 751 myoF • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON GMA-04: Evaluate city transportation facilities annually to determine compliance with the adopted level-of-service standards and, as necessary, amend the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) to remedy identified deficiencies. GMA-05: Coordinate transportation improvements with the State, Counties, and neighboring jurisdictions to encourage through trips to occur on state facilities, reducing stress on the city street network. OBJECTIVE: FINANCE To finance the transportation systems necessary to serve new development, while ensuring the City has the capability to finance general transportation needs. POLICIES: Funding-01: Require developments or redevelopments to construct transportation infrastructure systems needed to serve new developments. Funding-02: Actively pursue the formation of Local Improvement Districts (LID) to upgrade existing streets and sidewalks and construct new streets to the appropriate standard. Funding-03: Improvements that serve new developments will be constructed as a part of the development process. All costs will be borne by the developer when the development is served by the proposed transportation improvements. In some instances, the City may choose to participate in this construction if improvements serve more than adjacent developments. Funding-04: Revenues for street transportation improvements should primarily provide for the orderly development of the City's transportation system in compliance with the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The basic criterion for such funding should be the degree to which that project improves the overall transportation system and not the benefit that might accrue to individual properties. Where it is possible to establish a direct relationship between a needed improvement and a development, the development should be expected to contribute to its construction. Chapter S. Policies Page 5-8 ORD.E Page 278 of 751 CITY Or • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • Funding-05: Encourage public/private partnerships for financing transportation projects that remedy existing and anticipated transportation problems, or that foster economic growth. Funding-06: Aggressively seek and take advantage of federal, state, local, and private funding and lending sources that help implement the City's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Funding-07: Maintain a traffic impact fee system based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) guidelines, as modified by the City Council, as a means of enabling development to mitigate appropriately for associated traffic impacts. Funding-08: Reassess the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan if funding for transportation facilities is insufficient to maintain adopted level-of-service standards. OBJECTIVE: QUALITY OF LIFE To improve the quality of life for Auburn residents and businesses through design of the transportation system. • POLICIES: Q01.-01: Enhance the livability of Auburn through a variety of mechanisms, including the innovative design and construction of roadways, non- motorized facilities, and associated improvements. Apply design standards that result in attractive and functional transportation facilities. '+ la�,�� „ph. OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION e 111 SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) ■ A' 7 To efficiently operate the existing transportation t' system through Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies, thereby maximizing resources and reducing the need for costly system capacity expansion projects. ANINTZ Moving Traffic More Effectively with Intelligent Transportation Systems • Chapter 5. PO/ieks 1'q& i- ORD.E Page 279 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON POLICIES: TSM-01: Use TSM strategies to more efficiently utilize the existing infrastructure to optimize traffic flow and relieve congestion. Examples include: • Re-channelizadon/restriping,adding turn lanes,adding/increasing number of through lanes • Signal interconnect and optimization; • Turn movement restrictions; • Access Management;and • Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). TSM-02: Support Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation in coordination with Map 2-7. Future ITS corridors will be prioritized using the following criteria. • Grants,loans,or partner funding can be leveraged to expand the ITS system on a specific corridor(s). • There is existing infrastructure that would make it easier and more cost efficient to implement ITS elements. • The corridor(s) completes a logical segment or missing link in the citywide ITS network. • Significant travel-time savings can be achieved with ITS implementation. • Corridor supports other City communication and technology needs. • ITS implementation would have significant safety benefits,including reducing the need for police flaggers in intersections during events. TSM-03: ITS elements include but are not limited to: • Operational improvements such as traffic signal coordination; • Traveler information including traffic alerts and emergency notification; • Incident management;and • Traffic data collection. TSM-04: Require development to contribute its share of ITS improvements as mitigation. TSM-05: Program signal timing to encourage specific movements and the use of travel routes that are underutilized. OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) To utilize transportation demand management strategies to lessen demand for increased street system capacity, help maintain the LOS standard, and enhance quality of life for those who use and benefit from the transportation system. Chapter 5.Policies N,1,, 5- 1 r ORD.E Page 280 of 751 Ai3URN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON • POLICIES: TDM-01: Encourage the use of high-occupancy vehicles (buses, carpool, and vanpool) through both private programs and under the direction of Metro and Pierce Transit. TDM-02: Promote reduced employee travel during the daily peak travel periods through flexible work schedules and programs to allow employees to work part-time or full-time or at alternate work sites closer to home. TDM-03: Encourage employers to provide TDM measures in the workplace through such programs as preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles, car sharing, improved access for transit vehicles, and employee incentives for using high-occupancy vehicles. TDM-04: In making funding decisions, consider transportation investments that support transportation demand management approaches by providing alternatives to single-occupant vehicles, such as transit, bikeways and pedestrian paths. • TDM-05: Recognize emerging TDM strategies such as tolling, variable- priced lanes, and car sharing may be effective in certain situations. TDM-06: Coordinate with Metro and other jurisdictions to enhance Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs for CTR employers in Auburn. TDM-07: Lead by example through implementation of a thorough and successful Commute-Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City employees. OBJECTIVE: PARKING To ensure adequate coordination of parking needs with traffic and development needs and support development of a regional park-and ride lot system by Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. POLICIES: Parking-01: On-street parking should be allowed only when consistent with the function of the street and with traffic volumes. Parking-02: New developments should provide adequate off-street parking to meet their needs. • Chapter 5. Policies Page 5. 11 ORD.E Page 281 of 751 01\ 01 • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WAS I-It NG TON Parking-03: Develop and maintain regulations, which foster a balance between meeting the need for public parking and ensuring developers provide adequate parking to meet the demand generated by new development. Parking-04: In certain cases, such as in the Regional Growth Center and in areas with high pedestrian and transit use, it may be appropriate to reduce the developer parking obligation to achieve other community benefits or employ innovative parking strategies such as the use of "park & walk" lots, where people could park their vehicles and walk to nearby destinations. Parking-05: The City shall evaluate new residential subdivisions with constrained space for driveways, utility services, street lights, street trees, and fire hydrants and the resultant impact on the provision of adequate on-street parking. Where appropriate, the City shall require the subdivision to provide dispersed locations of on-street parking (or street accessible parking) to meet their needs in addition to the zoning code required off- street parking. Parking-06: Encourage park & ride lots on sites adjacent to compatible land uses with convenient access to the Auburn Station, SR 18, SR 167, and all regional transportation corridors. Parking-07: Work proactively with Sound Transit, WSDOT, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to ensure the adequate supply of park & ride capacity in Auburn. OBJECTIVE: RIGHT-OF-WAY To retain and preserve existing right-of-way, and identify and acquire new right-of-way as needed to achieve the City's objectives. POLICIES: ROW-01: The acquisition and preservation of right-of-way is a key component of maintaining a viable transportation system. Methods used to acquire and preserve right-of-way include: • Requiring dedication of right-of-way as a condition of development; • Purchasing right-of-way at fair market value;and Chapter 5. Policies Page 5- 12 ORD.E Page 282 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • ■ Acquiring development rights and easements from property owners. ROW-02: Preserve and protect existing right-of-way through the issuance of permits such as ROW Use permits and franchise and public way agreements, by monitoring and responding to right-of-way encroachments and safety impacts, and by limiting vacations of public right-of-way. ROW-03: Vacate right-of-way only when it clearly will not be a future need or to support economic development. OBJECTIVE: MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION To maintain the City's transportation system at a level that is comparable with the design standards applied to new facilities. POLICIES: Prsrv-01: Establish programs and schedules for the level and frequency of roadway and non-motorized system maintenance. Prsry-02: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street system, the City shall prohibit non-local trip heavy vehicles from traveling on city streets , unless the City permits such travel via the issuance of a • temporary haul permit that requires appropriate mitigation. Prsrv-03: Establish standards of street repair and seek to obtain sufficient financing to attain and maintain a safe system in good condition. Prsrv-04: Continue to implement the "Save Our Streets" program for maintenance and rehabilitation of local streets. Prsrv-05: Continue to implement the arterial/collector streets maintenance and rehabilitation program. Prsrv-06: Develop and implement operations and maintenance procedures to ensure ongoing effectiveness of LID infrastructure. Prsrv-07: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street system, the City may prohibit trenching or cutting into newly constructed or newly overlaid pavements for a period of 5 years. Overlays of up to the full roadway width of affected pavement surface should be required as mitigation in the event cuts into new pavements cannot be avoided. • Chapter 5. Policies Pave i-13 ORD.E Page 283 of 751 AUBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHING ION Prsrv-08: City shall notify and coordinate with all private and public utilities within the City limits when planning to complete pavement overlay's or reconstruction. 5.2 Street System OBJECTIVE: ``= COMPLETE -- - _ , . • r . -+.�. STREETS -- ,... Ensure Auburn's s.,,. �- - transportation :' — system is 1 designed to � enable comprehensive, 1' I integrated, safe - Save Our Streets - Patching Treatment access for users of all ill ,-.-o- ,.� ��. _ ,-�" �Wrr -- ages and x ,,,- � �'Y+�(i �� w abilities �► _= • y ; � .. x 'I °' including Helping those with Special Needs ''ta: ` ,p- r" .• I ..j sk pedestrians, ,. , , Y -. bicyclists, motorists, transit riders and T operators, and truck operators. 4 POLICIES: nmiliA Street-Ol: Plan for and develop a _ ! balanced transportation system, Save Our Streets - Overlay which provides safe access and connectivity to transportation facilities for users of all ages and abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit users and operators, and truck operators. Street-02: Plan for, design, and construct all transportation projects, whether City led or development driven, to provide appropriate accommodation for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, except in situations where the establishment of such facilities would be contrary to public health and safety or the cost would be excessively disproportionate to the need. Cl,amer 5. Porn les Page 5-14 ORD.E Page 284 of 751 CMOS Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASIIINGTON Street-03: Ensure the transportation system meets the requirements outlined A Y q in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Street-04: The Auburn Engineering Design Standards is the primary vehicle for executing the Complete Streets Objective and should include standards for each roadway classification to guide implementation. Street-05: Context and flexibility in balancing user needs shall be considered in the design of all projects and if necessary, a deviation from the Auburn Engineering Design Standards may be granted to ensure the Complete Streets Objective and supporting policies are achieved. OBJECTIVE: STREET NETWORK To provide an integrated street network of appropriate classes of streets designed to facilitate different types of traffic flows and access needs. POLICIES: Street-06: The city street system shall be made up of three classes of streets: a. Arterials - a system of city, county, and state streets designed to move • traffic to or from major traffic and activity generators. Arterials should be adequate in number, appropriately situated, and designed to accommodate moderate to high traffic volumes with a minimum of flow disruption. b. Collectors - a system of city streets that collect traffic and move it from the local street system to the arterial street system. c. Local streets - a system of city streets, which collect traffic from individual sites and conveys the traffic to the collector and arterial systems. Street-07: The Functional Roadway Classifications Map shall serve as the adopted standard for identifying classified streets in the City of Auburn and the potential annexation areas. Street-08: Ensure all eligible streets classified in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan are federally classified. • Chapter 5. Policies Page 5-lc ORD.E Page 285 of 751 cM0F Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON Street-09: Street standards shall be developed, modified, and implemented that reflect the street classification system and function. The design and management of the street network shall seek to improve the appearance of existing street corridors. Streets are recognized as an important component of the public spaces within the City and should include, where appropriate, landscaping to enhance the appearance of city street corridors. The standards should include provisions for streetscaping. Street-10: The classification standards �.,. ter` . adopted in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards are considered the City's minimum standards for new streets. In cases in which the City Principal Arterial: 15th Street NW attempts to rebuild an existing street within an established right-of-way, the City Council reserves the authority to determine if additional right-of-way should be obtained in order to realize the improvement. Preservation of neighborhood continuity and cohesiveness will be respected. Street-11: The standards for residential streets may be modified in cross section to provide better relationships between the different components of the street including, but not limited to, on-street parking, the landscape strip, and the sidewalk. Among other objectives, this may be done to balance the need to provide adequate parking and buffer pedestrians from traffic. Street-12: These minimum standards do not limit or prevent developers from providing facilities that exceed the City's standards. Street-13: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of arterial designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. Chaplet-5. Policies Page 5- 1/, ORD.E Page 286 of 751 A1IrURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan B WASHINGTON • Street-14: Designate new arterials to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Arterials shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. Street-15: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of collector designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. Street-16: Designate new collectors to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Collectors shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. Street-17: Access Tracts may be permitted, as long as emergency access can be guaranteed at all times. Street-18: The local street network shall be developed to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network in residential areas and minimize • through traffic in neighborhoods. • The internal local residential street network for a subdivision should be designed to discourage regional through traffic and non-residential traffic from penetrating the subdivision or adjacent subdivisions. • Where possible, streets shall be planned,designed and constructed to connect to future development. • When applicable,non-motorized paths shall be provided at the end of dead end streets to shorten walking distances to an adjacent arterial or public facilities including,but not limited to, schools and parks. • Residential developments should be planned in a manner that minimizes the number of local street accesses to arterials and collectors. • To promote efficient connectivity between areas of the community, existing stub end streets shall be linked to other streets in new development whenever the opportunity arises and the resulting traffic volumes are not likely to exceed acceptable volumes as identified in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards. OBJECTIVE: PRIVATE STREETS To discourage the development of private streets and ensure, if they are permitted by the City, they are constructed and maintained according to City standards. • Chapter S.Policies page S- 1- ORD.E Page 287 of 751 CITY OF • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON POLICIES: Street-19: Private streets are discouraged, but may be permitted on a discretionary basis, as regulated by city code and the Auburn Engineering Design Standards. street-20: If a private street is permitted, it must be built to public street standards as identified in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards and Construction Standards manuals. Street-21: Private streets must provide for emergency vehicle access and be privately maintained by an approved association or business. The City does not maintain private streets. OBJECTIVE: ACCESS MANAGEMENT To limit and provide access to the street network in a manner which improves and maintains public safety and roadway capacity. POLICIES: Street-22: Seek consolidation of access points to state highways, arterials, and collectors. This will benefit the highway and city street system, reduce interference with traffic flows on arterials, and discourage through traffic on local streets. To achieve this level of access control, the City: • Adopts and supports the State's controlled access policy on all state highway facilities; • May acquire access rights along some arterials and collectors; • Adopts design standards that identify access standards for each type of functional street classification; • Encourages consolidation of access in developing commercial and high density residential areas through shared use of driveways and local access streets;and • Will establish standards for access management,develop a planning process to work with the community and implement access management solutions on arterial corridors. Street-23: Strive to prevent negative impacts to existing businesses,without compromising safety, when implementing access management. OBJECTIVE: THROUGH TRAFFIC To accommodate through traffic in the City as efficiently as possible, with a minimum of disruption to neighborhoods. (Jiln er S. N!Jiii.; Page 5- 1S ORD.E Page 288 of 751 crrvor • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WAS)I)NGTON • POLICIES: Street-24: Continue to coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation to facilitate the movement of traffic through the City. Street-25: Encourage the State and Counties to develop through routes, which minimize the impact of through traffic on Auburn's residential neighborhoods. Street-26: Actively solicit action by the State and Counties to program and construct those improvements needed to serve Auburn to the state and county arterial and freeway systems. OBJECTIVE: TRAFFIC CALMING To employ traffic calming techniques to improve safety and neighborhood quality. POLICIES: Street-27: Implement the City's traffic calming program to improve neighborhood safety and quality. Street-28: The traffic calming program shall require a technical analysis of existing conditions and appropriate treatments before actions are taken to fund and implement traffic calming measures. Street-29: The traffic calming program shall incorporate neighborhood involvement and seek community support. Street-30: New construction should incorporate traffic calming measures, as appropriate. OBJECTIVE: FREIGHT MOVEMENTS To facilitate the movements of freight and goods through Auburn with minimal adverse traffic and other environmental impacts. POLICIES: Freight-01: The movement of freight and goods is recognized as an important component of Auburn's transportation system. Freight-02: The movement of freight and goods which serve largely national, state, or regional needs should take place in such a way so that the impacts on the local transportation system are minimized. These movements • (,hiaplcr 5.Policies hair 5- /9 ORD.E Page 289 of 751 GITYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan •AUBURN should take place primarily on state highways, Interstates, or on grade- separated rail corridors in order to minimize the local impacts. Freight-03: Seek public and private partners to leverage funds for freight improvement projects and associated mitigation. Freight-04: Continue to work with the Freight Mobility Roundtable, FAST, FMSIB, and other local and regional groups to ensure regional needs are met, and local impacts are mitigated. Freight-05: All through truck trips and the majority of local trips shall take place on designated truck routes, as identified on the truck route map, Map 2-3, of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This policy shall not apply to developments and uses operating under existing right-of-way use permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements directly related to the regulation of permitted haul routes. Freight-06: If the City is unable to acquire funding to maintain existing truck routes to a Pavement Condition Index Standard of 70 on a segment of roadway, that route may be restricted or closed to truck travel. Freight-07: Work towards designing and constructing future truck routes, as identified on the truck route map in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, to sustain routine truck traffic. Freight-08: Local truck trips that have origins and/or destinations in Auburn may have to sometimes use routes not designated as truck routes. The City may approve the use of alternate routes not currently designated as truck routes for truck traffic, with appropriate mitigation. Approval may be made through issuance of right-of-way use permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements. Freight-09: Development shall be required to mitigate the impacts of construction generated truck traffic on the City's transportation system, based on the City's LOS standard. Freight-10: Temporary haul routes for overweight or oversized vehicles shall be permitted under circumstances acceptable to the City and with 04ter 5.Policies !'a 5-_?(i ORD.E Page 290 of 751 cm or Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • appropriate mitigation. A temporary haul permit must be obtained prior to the hauling of oversized or overweight freight. Freight-11: Truck traffic in residential neighborhoods shall be prohibited, except for local deliveries within said neighborhood, unless no other possible route is available, in which case mitigation may be required. OBJECTIVE: LATECOMER POLICY To enable private investors to recover a portion of improvement costs for transportation facility improvements that benefit other developments. POLI CIES: LC-01: The City may enter into latecomer agreements where substantial transportation investments are made by one party that legitimately should be reimbursed by others, such as, when the infrastructure improvement will benefit a future development. Such agreements will be at the discretion of the City Council. Latecomer agreements do not apply to situations in which a property owner is required to construct improvements per an existing city code provision, such as in the case of half-street and other frontage improvements. OBJECTIVE: ROUNDABOUTS To seek air quality, safety, and capacity benefits by promoting the use of roundabouts over traffic signals. POLICIES: RB-01: Intersections controlled with roundabouts are preferred over signalized intersections whenever feasible and appropriate due to the benefits achieved with roundabouts including reduced collision rate for vehicles and pedestrians, less severe collisions, smoother traffic flow, reduced vehicle emissions and fuel consumption, lower long-term maintenance costs, and improved aesthetics. RB-02: Developments required to signalize an intersection as mitigation for a project may be required to install a roundabout instead of a traffic signal. The feasibility of acquiring the land needed for a roundabout will be considered as a factor in this requirement. • Chapter?. Polities 1,aj,e 5- 21 ORD.E Page 291 of 751 AUBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASH I NGTON 5.3 Non-motorized System OBJECTIVE: PLANNING THE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM To plan a coordinated, interconnected network of non-motorized transportation facilities that effectively provide access to local and regional destinations, improve overall quality of life, and support healthy community and environmental principles. POLICIES: NM-01: Implement land use regulations and encourage site design that promotes non-motorized forms of transportation. NM-02: Include the role of non-motorized transportation in all transportation planning, programming, and if suitable, capital improvement projects. • , Interurban Trail at W Main Street NM-03: Plan for continuous non-motorized circulation routes within and between existing, new or redeveloping commercial, residential, and industrial developments. Transportation planning shall seek to allow pedestrians and bicyclists the ability to cross or avoid barriers in a manner that is safe and convenient. NM-04: Actively seek to acquire land along corridors identified for future trail development in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Auburn Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Plan 2005 and subsequent Park plans. C..G oo.S..Policies Pap >-22 ORD.E Page 292 of 751 Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • NM-05: Schedulelan and co-sponsor events that support recreational p P Pp walking and bicycling. These events should emphasize their recreational and health values and introduce people to the transportation capabilities of bicycling and walking. NM-06: Improve and protect the non-motorized transportation system through the establishment of level-of-service goals for non-motorized facilities. OBJECTIVE: DEVELOPING THE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM To build a safe, attractive, and inter-connected non-motorized transportation system. POLICIES: NM-06: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike routes, walkways and equestrian paths, to encourage significant recreational use. NM-07: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike routes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths in a manner that promotes non- • motorized travel as a viable mode of transportation. NM-08: Develop the non-motorized system to accommodate appropriate alternative forms of non-motorized transport, as well as medically necessary motorized transport. NM-09: Appropriate street furniture, lighting, signage, and landscaping should be installed along non-motorized routes to increase safety and to ensure that facilities are inviting to users. NM-10: Clearly sign and mark major non-motorized routes to guide travelers and improve safety. NM-11: Non-motorized routes shall be constructed to accommodate emergency vehicle access and be amenable to law enforcement. NM-12: Locate and design non-motorized transportation systems so that they contribute to the safety, efficiency, enjoyment and convenience of residential neighborhoods. Chapter 5. Palicies Page.5.23 ORD.E Page 293 of 751 AUBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON NM-13: The development of facilities supporting non-motorized transportation should be provided as a regular element of new construction projects. Improvements shall be secured through the development review process. NM-14: Minimize hazards and obstructions on the non-motorized transportation system by properly designing, constructing, managing, and maintaining designated routes in the system. OBJECTIVE: PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL To enhance and encourage pedestrian travel in Auburn. POLICIES: Ped-01: Promote pedestrian travel within the city and connections to adjacent communities with emphasis placed on safety and on connectivity to priority destinations such as schools, parks, the downtown, and other pedestrian-oriented areas. Pedestrian-oriented areas are those areas with high pedestrian traffic or potential and are identified in this plan. These areas and streets shall encourage pedestrian travel by providing enhanced pedestrian improvements or controls on motorized traffic. Ped-02: Focus investments on and aggressively seek funding for the high priority pedestrian corridors, identified in Map 3-2. Ped-03: Require developers to incorporate pedestrian facilities into new development and redevelopment in conformance with the Auburn City Code. Ped-04: Continue to construct new and rehabilitate existing sidewalks through a sidewalk improvement program. Ped-05: Seek ways to provide pedestrian amenities such as streetlights, trees, seating areas, signage, and public art along all major pedestrian travel routes. Ped-06: Work towards buffering pedestrian walkways from moving traffic, particularly in areas with high levels of pedestrian movements, such as near 7tnt'ter C. Policies I ir'r 5- 1 ORD.E Page 294 of 751 t QTY OI Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON schools and commercial areas, and alongcorridors with heavyvehicular traffic. Ped-07: Pedestrian crossings shall be developed at locations with significant pedestrian traffic and designed to match pedestrian desire lines. Ped-08: Encourage the formation of LIDs to develop pedestrian pathways and other non-motorized amenities throughout the City. Partner with the local school districts to improve Safe Walking Routes to School. OBJECTIVE: BICYCLE TRAVEL To improve Auburn's bicycling network. POLICIES: Bike-01: Develop programs and publications, and work with local employers to encourage citywide bicycle commuting. Bike-02: Designate, develop, and maintain high priority bicycle routes, in conformance with Map 3-4, that create an interconnected system of bike facilities for local and regional travel, including on-street bike routes, and • multi-purpose trails. Bike-03: During the development review process, ensure projects are consistent with the Non-motorized chapter of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan by requiring right-of-way dedications and other improvements as needed to develop the bicycle network. Bike-04: Focus investments on and aggressively seek funding for the high priority future bicycle corridors, identified in Map 3-4 and corridors and connectors, as applicable, specified in Map 3-5. Bike-05: Encourage the inclusion of convenient and secure bicycle storage facilities in all large public and private developments. Bike-06: Continue to develop and implement Sharrows and associated Share the Road signage in residential and some non-residential areas of City. Bike-07: Continue installation of bike lanes in parts of City where there is existing/adequate right-of-way. • (pier 5. Policies Page ORD.E Page 295 of 751 CITY OF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASIUNG ION Bike-08: Develop an Auburn specific bicycle signage program to highlight corridors, connectors and in-city/out of city destinations. Bike-09: Make improvements to existing Interurban Trail — signage, pavement conditions, vegetation maintenance, grade crossings, and upgrades to user facilities at Main Street crossing. Bike-10: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate for the design and construction of bicycle/pedestrian bridge at southern terminus of M St. west of existing Stuck River Vehicle Bridge. Bike-11: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate for the design and construction of innovative and safe pedestrian/bicycle crossing at M St./Auburn Way South intersection. Bike-12: Install one or more bike boxes through a pilot program approach to test effectiveness and public response. Focus pilot program efforts at key intersections such as the West Main Street and C Street intersection, the M Street and Auburn Way South intersection and the Ellingson Road and A Street intersection. Bike-13: Continue to install bicycle/pedestrian crossing warning systems along Interurban Trail at all crossing locations consisting of S 277th Street, 37th Street NW, and W Main Street. Bike-14: Develop and maintain an official Auburn Bicycling Guide Map. Bike-15: In coordination with the City Council, Mayor's Office, Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, Auburn Tourism Board and appropriate City departments develop strategies and actions for the implementation of the bicycle oriented economic development recommendations of the Auburn Bicycle Task Force. OBJECTIVE: EQUESTRIAN TRAVEL To improve Auburn's equestrian environment. POLICIES: Eq-01: Strive to incorporate equestrian facilities into the design of trail and transportation facilities, where possible and appropriate. These efforts Cb,;pm.5•..Policies PaSr 5-21, ORD.E Page 296 of 751 (Iry°, Comprehensive Transportation Plan Au BURN WASHINGrov • should be concentrated south of the White River in Auburn's southeast corner and in Lea Hill, but considered for other areas of the City. Eq-02: Transportation projects, and other public and private projects, in lower-density neighborhoods should be evaluated, and where possible, planned, designed and constructed to be compatible with equestrian use. Eq-03: Create an interconnected system of safe equestrian trails and provide adequate equestrian amenities adjacent to those trails. 5.4 Transit System OBJECTIVE: TRANSIT SERVICES To encourage the continued development of public transit systems and other alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel, to relieve traffic congestion, to reduce reliance on the automobile for personal transportation needs, to improve route coverage and scheduling, and to ensure transit is a convenient and reliable mode option for both local and regional trips. Transit-01: Partner with WSDOT, Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and private businesses to achieve Auburn's transit and passenger rail objectives. • Transit-02: Work with local and regional transit agencies to serve new and existing trip generators in Auburn, such as colleges, commercial areas, and community facilities. Transit-03: Encourage Sound Transit, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to expand transit to underserved areas of Auburn. Transit-04: Partner with WSDOT, Amtrak, and Sound Transit to establish an intercity passenger rail stop at the Auburn Station. Transit-05: Consider both the transit impacts and the opportunities presented by major development proposals when reviewing development under the State Environmental Policy Act. Transit-06: Encourage the inclusion of transit facilities in new development when appropriate. Transit-07: Encourage bus stops to be located at well-lit and accessible areas. • ('ba per 5. !Wirier Per,ge 5-2- ORD.E Page 297 of 751 AJBURJSS4 E>, • Comprehensive Transportation Plan WASHINGTON Transit-08: Work with transit providers and regional agencies to develop a transit system that is fully accessible to pedestrians and the physically challenged, and which integrates the access, safety, and parking requirements of bicyclists. Transit-09: Identify areas of concentrated transit traffic and impose design and construction standards that accommodate the unique considerations associated with bus travel, such as street geometry and pedestrian linkages. Transit-10: Work with transit providers to create new commuter — oriented transit routes and maintain existing commuter routes linked with Sounder commuter rail. Transit-11: Develop rider information packages that inform users of commuter, transit, rail, trail, and air transportation opportunities. 5.5 Air Transportation OBJECTIVE: AIR TRANSPORTATION To provide an efficient municipal airport, serving light general aviation aircraft, as an integral part of the City's transportation system. POLICIES: Air-01: Continue to develop the Auburn Municipal Airport in accordance with the Airport Master Plan. Air-02: The airport shall be managed as a general aviation facility; the use of jet aircrafts and helicopters that create noise and land use conflicts shall be evaluated, in conformance with FAA regulations. Air-03: The siting of new airport facilities shall consider neighborhood impacts such as increased noise generated from the use of those facilities. Air-04: Use of the airport by non-conventional aircraft such as ultra lights shall be discouraged, in conformance with FAA regulations. Air-05: The City's zoning ordinance and other appropriate regulatory measures shall enforce the airport clear zones as regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The impact of development on air safety CGorter 5. Policies Page 5-2V ORD.E Page 298 of 751 Ill 01 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Au BURN N WAS I-f IN GT( • shall be assessed through SEPA review, and appropriate mitigation measures shall be required by the City. Air-06: Minimize or eliminate the potentially adverse effects of light and glare on the operation of the Auburn Airport. • 110 Chapter 5. Policies Pgt;e i-29 ORD.E Page 299 of 751 CtFYOF Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN Vs'ASH INGTON CHAPTER 6. FUNDING The ability to finance the maintenance and enhancement of the transportation system is critical to the implementation of this plan and the success of the future transportation system. This chapter details the financial planning tools and funding mechanisms available to accomplish these goals. 6.1 Financial Planning and Programming The City updates its financial plan annually in order to ensure programmed transportation improvements are financially feasible and prioritized in accordance with available funds. The Transportation Improvement Program and Capital Facilities Plan are the two financial planning documents the City uses to identify its financial strategy for implementing transportation improvements. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a six year plan which lists programmed transportation improvements in the following categories: roadway improvement projects, intersection improvement projects, non-motorized and transit projects, preliminary engineering and miscellaneous projects, and preservation projects. Transportation needs are identified by ' . ,,. , ,.- --mining the latest information concerning X 64 R° ty and accident history, growth trends, the .'''‘..1.''''.:17,71.: :, _r 6c model, traffic studies, and the • i prehensive Transportation Plan. The City A.is a six-year Transportation Improvement Program ` ( , ( 1 I ! - ') annually, including a revenue forecast and C ysis of available funding. Projects are then ., -y„ _, ;: 1 ,.. ritized according to a number of factors ; ;,,-tiding safety,capacity needs, access needs, and fi 4 . Tait: T' rt _ likelihood of securing funding. The first three 7tri Irk, Itt. _ . s of the TIP must be financially constrained, .roject programming is often limited due to .. .'ng limitations. Auburn City Hall The TIP is an important tool for identifying funding needs and developing a financial plan for project implementation. It also feeds into the Capital Facilities Plan. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is the Comprehensive Plan element which identifies the financial plan for implementing all capital improvements in Auburn. Transportation improvements are included Chapter 6.Funding 13,p / I ORD.E Page 300 of 751 CITY Or Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON in the Capital Facilities Plan, which is amended annually. The Capital Facilities Plan enables the City to fulfill the GMA requirement of having a multiyear financing plan based on identified transportation needs. It also enables the City to make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars and make timely decisions about maintaining levels-of-service in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan standards. 6.2 Funding Sources The City uses a combination of public and private funding sources to implement transportation improvements in Auburn,both for maintenance activities and capital improvements. GENERAL TAX REVENUES The City receives tax revenues from a variety of state,regional, and local sources including the real estate excise tax, sales tax, and the motor vehicle fuel tax. Despite these revenues, the City has numerous maintenance and capital improvement needs that cannot be met by existing tax revenues alone. Recognizing the need to raise additional revenues for the local street system, Auburn residents approved the 'Save Our Streets' (SOS) program in 2004 for specific funding from property taxes, and in doing so, created a funding program to help rehabilitate Auburn's residential streets. In 2013, the City Council modified the funding source for the program to be from Construction Sales Tax instead of property taxes. • With the success of the'Save Our Streets'program,the City intends to pursue a program that will help fund arterial and collector street maintenance. The City does have an Arterial Street Fund; however, these funds have proven inadequate in addressing all the maintenance and capital needs of the arterial system. In addition, the City has also created an Arterial Street Preservation Program to preserve and rehabilitate the pavement on these classes of streets. The program is funded through a one percent utility tax which was adopted by City Council during 2008. GRANTS The City has an active grant program and continually seeks grants, both private and public, to improve Auburn's transportation system. The following is a list of some of the grants the City has historically applied for and will likely apply for again in the future. FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) replaced the Transportation Enhancement (I h.) Activities with the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). The original TE activities remain eligible for TE funds that were previously apportioned until the TE funds are obligated, rescinded, or lapse. MAP-21 funds projects designed to strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, and environmental aspects of the inter-modal transportation system. The program provides for the implementation of a variety of non-traditional projects, including the restoration of historic transportation facilities, the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, landscaping and scenic beautification, and the mitigation of water pollution from highway runoff. • Chapter 6.Funding Page 6-2 ORD.E Page 301 of 751 A ITN 01 • Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING ION The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any public road, non-motorized improvements, bridge projects, and transit capital projects. The Safety Program is a federal program targeted at reducing accident rates at intersections and along corridors, particularly at those locations with higher than average fatality and injury rates. Funds come from the Highway Safety Improvement (HSIP) Program included in MAP-21. HSIP requires that states program and spend safety funds according to their Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Washington State's plan is called Target Zero. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program is a federally funded program administered through PSRC. CMAQ funds projects and programs in air quality non-attainment and maintenance areas,which reduce transportation related emissions. In addition to the aforementioned programs,the federal government has an annual appropriations bill. Auburn may apply through the offices of Washington senators and congressional members for funding for specific projects. This funding source has historically been a successful means of financing some of the City's more expensive capital improvement projects. FEDERAL LEGISLATION President Obama signed MAP-21 (P.L. 112-141) into law on July 6, 2012. This major transportation law provided $105 billion for the nation's surface transportation programs over a two-year period. MAP-21 replaced the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act—A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU),which was enacted in 2005 with an expiration date of 2009. Congress had passed nine short-term extensions to SAFETEA-LU before finally agreeing the two-year MAP-21 almost three years later. After a series of extensions, MAP21 is now set to expire October 29,2015. Efforts are currently underway in Congress to reauthorize the Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21).The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act also dedicates funding to numerous programs, many of which can be used to help finance the City's programmed transportation improvement projects. STATE FUNDED PROGRAMS The Safe Routes to Schools Program is a state and federally funded program that aims to protect children from traffic related deaths and injuries and promotes a healthy lifestyle by encouraging bicycling and walking to school. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grant is a state funded program that funds non-motorized safety improvements. The Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) administers annual grant programs that fund roadway and non-motorized projects that improve safety, mobility, capacity, and promote economic development. The TIB offers several programs, each of which emphasizes different funding criteria. The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) is a state funded program that provides low-cost financing for public facility improvements. Public entities are eligible to apply for and receive loans and grants for public facilities linked to economic development outcomes Chapter 6.Finding Page 6-i ORD.E Page 302 of 751 CrryOf Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHING^ION 4110 such as private business investment and job creation. CERB also finances site-specific studies and plans. LOANS Low-interest loans are also available to municipalities. For example the Washington State Department of Commerce Public Works Board offers low-interest loans for local governments to finance public infrastructure construction and rehabilitation. Eligible projects must improve public health and safety, respond to environmental issues, promote economic development, or upgrade system performance. Roads, streets and bridges are eligible for these loans. The loans can be strategically employed to leverage grant funding by providing a local match, enabling the City to compete for funding for public infrastructure projects. In addition, the City has the option of issuing bonds for public infrastructure projects. PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRIBUTIONS The City has an established traffic impact fee system based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) guidelines, as amended by the City Council. The fee system estimates the amount of traffic each development is anticipated to create, based on the land use type and size. Traffic impact fees compensate the City for the capacity improvements needed to accommodate the new trips generated by new development. In turn, the City uses the revenues to expand the street network through the capacity projects included in the TIP. The fees are based on the costs of the capacity project included in the TIP and forecast growth throughout the City. The fees are updated annually following the adoption of the TIP by City Council. Payment of the impact fee does not S relieve developers of their codified obligation to construct half-street improvements, nor the need to mitigate project impacts identified through the SEPA process, which may include the construction of an identified TIP project (and a credit for the impact fee contribution towards that project). The City also charges a truck impact fee for certain land-use types which are associated with significant truck traffic generation,such as commercial and industrial uses. These fees are used to address impacts on the City's truck routes and other truck-related infrastructure. FUNDING PARTNERSHIPS The City has successfully formed several funding partnerships, which have enabled it to leverage its resources in implementing transportation improvements. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS Local Improvement Districts (LID) enable city investment in a specified area by leveraging city funds, when available, with contributions from property owners in the district. In essence, LID's are a means of using limited city resources to improve neighborhood quality through improvement of streets, sidewalks,and other features of the roadway. FAST(FREIGHT ACTION STRATEGY TEAM) FAST is an innovative partnership composed of transportation agencies, ports, cities, economic development organizations, trucking, rail, and business interests. One of FAST's primary objectives is to obtain funding for projects that improve freight mobility. FAST helped fund the S • !'i/)ter 6. Funding Page 6-4 ORD.E Page 303 of 751 ATBURN Comprehensive Transportation Plan vAA5H I NG1 OWN 277th Street Grade Separation, the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation, and the M Street Underpass project. FMSIB (FREIGHT MOBILITY STRATEGIC INVESTMENT BOARD) The mission of the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) is to create a comprehensive and coordinated state program to facilitate freight movement to local, national, and international markets. FMSIB is also charged with lessening the impact of freight movements on local communities. FMSIB obtains funding directly from legislative appropriations and has contributed funds to the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation, the S 277th Street Grade Separation and the M Street Underpass projects. FUTURE FINANCING POSSIBILITIES As the transportation system evolves, so will the range of financing options available to the City. In general, the financing options currently available under state law fall short of meeting current and anticipated transportation improvement needs. Hence, the City will continue to seek fair and sustainable strategies for funding the maintenance activities and capital improvements needed to preserve the City's transportation network. Among other strategies, the implementation of a street utility may be employed to fund many of the City's transportation needs. TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT In 1987, the State Legislature created Transportation Benefit Districts c1BDs) as an option for local governments to fund transportation improvements. Chapter 36.73 of the Revised Code of Washington provides for the establishment of TBD by cities and counties to levy and impose various taxes and fees to generate revenues to support transportation improvements within the district. A TBD is a quasi-municipal corporation and independent taxing district created for the sole purpose of acquiring, constructing, improving, providing, and funding transportation improvements within the district. In 2005 and 2007, the Legislature amended the TBD statute to expand its uses and revenue authority, including the ability to authorize a $20 annual vehicle license fee (VLF), and up to an additional $80 of VLF, if approved by voters within the district. The state legislature provided local governments with these tools because inflation has eroded the local share of gas tax and a series of statewide ballot initiatives passed over the last 12 years have eliminated other traditional sources of funding for local transportation needs. The City of Auburn created a TBD in 2011.The TBD is currently considering the implementation of the $20 annual vehicle fee, possible local sales tax increase and how the revenue raised could be best used to achieve the goals of the TBD. STREET UTILITY A street utility would be used similarly to how sewer and water utility fees are now collected. A monthly or annual fee would be charged to residents and businesses in Auburn, for example via a flat fee or through a pro-rated fee based on anticipated usage. The implementation of a street utility would require a change in state law. The street utility system is one in which all residents and businesses would pay their fair share of funding street maintenance and repair. If implemented, a street utility would undoubtedly be combined with the suite of other financing strategies the City currently employs. Chapter 6. F/rndin,g Page 6-5 ORD.E Page 304 of 751 CITY or Comprehensive Transportation Plan ,AUBURN wAs N I N C;TO N • 6.3 FundingStrategies St ategies and Project Prioritization The City uses a variety of criteria to prioritize transportation projects, including safety, mobility, and overall community benefit. In addition, the City also considers the availability of funding and the ability to leverage City dollars to raise addition funds. For example, grants are often available for specific types of capital investments, whereas they are more limited for maintenance/preservation. Hence, the City often needs to budget for maintenance/preservation through tax revenues. Capital improvements may be financially secured through a combination of public and private investment. Hence, project prioritization for capital improvements is often partially dependent on the ability to secure outside funding. Likewise, maintenance and preservation is highly dependent on the limited tax revenues available to the City. In the future, the City will need to continue lobbying for its share of federal, state, and county tax revenues,seek creative avenues for securing private investment dollars and grant funds, and potentially implement new funding strategies such as tolling and street utility fees. 4110 Chapter 6. Funding Page 6-6 ORD.E Page 305 of 751 CITY OF - Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASH INGTON • • CHAPTER 7. t' MONITORING AND EVALUATION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan, a long- '"" ji range plan with the horizon year 2035, predicts the needs and conditions of the future Auburn Time transportation system, enabling the City to Auburn Station Clock anticipate its future needs. Nonetheless, the transportation network is dynamic, constantly evolving due to circumstances beyond the scope and influence of this plan. Hence,regular updates are necessary to ensure the Plan remains current and relevant. 7.1 Annual Updates The Comprehensive Transportation Plan can be amended annually as part of the City's regular Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle, which ensures proposed changes go through a public review process before the amended plan is adopted by the City Council at the end of the calendar year. In preparation for the annual amendment cycle, the City will review the plan and propose updates as needed. These proposed updates may be due to changes to City priorities, the availability of new information, or the relevance of certain plan components. RE-EVALUATION The annual re-evaluation process provides an opportunity for the City to identify progress made in implementing the Plan,as well as identify new needs that have arisen since the previous update. The update will consider the street, non-motorized and transit systems, and assess whether the Plan adequately addresses the implementation strategies necessary to ensure the transportation infrastructure continues to grow in line with the City's objectives. As part of this process, the City will review its future projects list and update the Transportation Improvement Program and the Capital Facilities Plan as appropriate. It will also review and update the Policies and Funding chapters, in order to remain consistent with the City's vision and current with potential funding strategies. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan contains a range of technical data, much of which informs other elements of the Plan. As part of the annual amendment cycle, technical information, such as traffic volumes, existing levels-of-service, roadway classifications, and transit route and ridership information will be updated as appropriate. Updated information will inform Chapter 7.Monte,*and Lnaitration Prge 7- I ORD.E Page 306 of 751 AMY or Comprehensive Transportation Plan AUBURN WASHINGTON • much of the evaluation process, enabling the City to quantify system changes over time and make appropriate decisions in planning the future system. MODEL UPDATES The City's traffic model shall be updated on a regular basis, every few years, as new land use, employment, and housing data becomes available. Model updates are important as they ensure the City has an accurate understanding of how land use patterns, employment, and other factors impact future transportation conditions, enabling the City Council to make informed policy decisions. The model also provides an understanding of the impacts associated with different projects, allowing the City to devise a revised list of future projects to improve capacity and safety, as well as achieve other priorities. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY The annual evaluation process is an opportunity to ensure the Comprehensive Transportation Plan is consistent with other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the land-use element, economic development element, Auburn Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, Transportation Improvement Program, and Capital Facilities Plan. Hence, as part of the annual amendment cycle, the City will ensure these plan components are consistent with and supportive of each other. 7.2 Multi-Year Updates • The City has the opportunity to preform annual updates to the Comprehensive Transportation Plan on an as needed basis to account for significant changes which have occurred during the previous year. A more exhaustive process is periodically necessary, hence, a thorough rewrite of the Plan shall be conducted every five to eight years. This endeavor will include a broad public outreach effort with input from neighboring jurisdictions, state and regional agencies,and Auburn residents and businesses. Much like the process for the 2009 update, it will present an opportunity to holistically examine the current transportation system and lay the framework for development of the future system. Chapter 7.Monitoring and Evaluation Page 7-2 ORD.E Page 307 of 751 Exhibit 8 AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - VOLUME 6 • Economic Development Element ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT VISION Auburn is a community that has a robust and diverse economy where businesses seek to locate,people desire to visit, and residents enjoy a range of commercial offerings. Businesses that locate in Auburn find it easy to enter the marketplace, encounter ideal conditions for their long term success, and become rooted and involved in the community. Visitors continue to return to Auburn because of its high quality natural resources, parks, public spaces, and commercial attractions. Residents choose to live in Auburn because of the diverse, family wage employment opportunities and access to entertainment, restaurant, retail and services. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONDITIONS AND TRENDS SUMMARY Historic Trends: Historically, a variety of factors have shaped Auburn's economy. At the turn of the 20°t century, the City offered services to support agriculture and the railroads. Downtown offered a full range of services and retail opportunities. In later years, automotive sales became a significant factor. As urbanization of the region expanded to include Auburn, the vitality of Downtown Auburn was impacted by new shopping malls located outside the community and by changing retail trends. At the same time. Auburn's importance as the home of large industrial and warehousing operations increased. This same period saw the growth of retail along commercial "strips" such as Auburn Way and 15th Street NW. Large retailers such as Fred Meyer and many major supermarket chains located in the community. The development of the SuperMall (now called The Outlet Collection) in the 1990's led to Auburn becoming a major player in the regional retail market. Auburn shoppers no longer needed to leave the City to visit • retail malls for many of their purchases. During that same decade, Emerald Downs and the Muckleshoot Casino also contributed to commercial recreation facilities in Auburn and associated employment growth. Today, Auburn provides approximately 41,000 jobs for residents throughout the region. Auburn has a strong industrial sector that includes Boeing, the General Service Administration (GSA) and numerous warehouse and distribution facilities. Multicare and the growing medical office community also provide a significant number of jobs. The retail and service sectors are expanding as small businesses are created. Educational uses such as the Auburn School District and Green River College also add to the area's employment base. While development has continued throughout the City, Downtown Auburn remains the heart and soul of the community. With its historical character and pedestrian oriented development pattern, Downtown Auburn reflects many of the qualities being sought by other communities. Given its urban center designation, Auburn Station. and the incentives the City has in place, Downtown Auburn remains poised for continued revitalization. Employment Growth: Between 1995 to 2013, the number of jobs located in Auburn increased 46%. While historically manufacturing jobs were the largest category. the 2010 Census indicates that service jobs have are most dominant followed by manufacturing. The remaining job categories all experienced job growth. Retail jobs increased substantially along with jobs in warehousing, transportation, and communication industries. It is expected that Auburn's employment base will continue to grow into the future. To the year 2031. the King and Pierce County Countywide Planning Policies have assigned Auburn's job base to increase by just over 20,000 jobs. It should be noted that this number is not a maximum, but the City's most recent • assigned share of future projected growth in the County. 0RD.E Page 308 of 751 .)RAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Retail Sales: Auburn's business community is keeping pace with both Auburn's population growth and its increase in more affluent households. Between 2005 and 2008, retail sales in Auburn increased 7% or roughly 8% per year. With the implementation of streamlined sales tax in 2008 and the global economic decline, sales tax revenues dropped by 16.5%in 2009. Since 2009 revenues have increased by 34%. Streamlined Sales Tax: The State of Washington adopted streamlined sales tax (SST) legislation in 2008. Prior to SST, sales tax collection in Washington State was based on the site of origin, rather than on the site of delivery. Under the SST tax structure, sales tax is collected at the site of delivery rather than from those areas from which they were shipped. This change in tax structure has put Auburn at a disadvantage and negatively impact its tax revenue. Specifically, Auburn and similar cities have historically invested in infrastructure to support businesses engaged in warehouse and distribution activities that ship goods to other destinations. Another concern for Auburn and similar cities that have invested in infrastructure include how the debt that has already been extended for such infrastructure will be paid and how the loss of a significant source of revenue will affect bond ratings. Based on the potential passage of SST, the Auburn City Council approved Resolution No. 3782 in November 2004. Resolution No. 3782 outlines an approach and actions the City will take related to land use planning, zoning and other matters in the event a streamlined sales tax proposal or other similar proposals that change the tax structure are adopted. Because of the State of Washington's implementation of sales tax mitigation payments to cities such as Auburn, the impact resulting from streamlined sales tax has been somewhat lessened. However, the continued availability of these payments is not certain due in part to the State's current and anticipated fiscal challenges. In addition, the amount of payments does not equal the total loss in revenue to the City. The City's economic development strategies are dependent upon the City being able to continue a strong public investment program in infrastructure and services. The City's ability to continue this public investment is contingent upon maintaining solvent public revenue streams, particularly sales tax. Sales tax comprises the largest source of monies to the City's General Fund, approximately 30 percent in 2010. The City anticipates that current and long-term fiscal challenges facing the State of Washington will likely results in the dissolution of the current sales tax revenue mitigation program. The eventual loss of the aforementioned sales tax revenue will directly and adversely affect the City's ability to adequately fund the capital infrastructure and services necessary to support the realization of the City's economic development strategies. This is especially applicable to industrial areas supporting warehouse and distribution centers that are origin based in nature. In 2005 the City of Auburn brought together a focus group of diverse business and community interests that identified several economic development areas within the City. The focus group's effort is reflected in an Economic Development Strategies document that includes strategies and actions needed to affect necessary change for specific strategy areas within the city. Implementation of these strategies is intended to enable the City to achieve the City's economic development potential. Implementation of actions and strategies in the Economic Development Strategies is appropriate and reflected in various elements of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Since the development of the Economic Development Strategies document, additional economic development strategy areas have been identified to include the SE 312'h Street/124'h Avenue SE corridor within the recently annexed portion of Lea Hill and M Street SE between Auburn Way North and Auburn Way South. INTRODUCTION ORDS . 9 of 751 12 DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 In October of 2015 the City of Auburn initiated the process for developing a strategic plan to guide the City's economic development activities over the next 10 years. The plan will outline a key set of strategies • and actions that build upon the City's current asset base and assist the City in overcoming challenges. The plan will also facilitate the growth and expansion of existing industry and business sectors as well as promote investment in targeted redevelopment corridors. Finally, the strategic plan will address both the needs and impediments of existing business while defining approaches for attracting and cultivating new businesses. The first phase of the project will involve a comprehensive communitywide stakeholder input process and include detailed community analyses that will allow the team to understand Auburn's strengths. weaknesses. opportunities, and threats. In the next phase of the project, the team will identify and refine the City's most promising economic development opportunities by conducting a market capacity study, perception study, and target industry analysis. In the last phase of the project, the team will identify specific goals, strategies, and actions to capitalize on its opportunities. The final plan will include an implementation matrix that assigns responsibility, outlines timing, and estimates costs. The project aims to better position the City of Auburn as great places to live. learn, work, and play. The plan will balance the needs of existing businesses with the need to expand and diversify the City's employment base. The recommended strategies and actions will increase employment in the City as well as its commercial tax base. The plan will be completed and approved by the Auburn City Council by August 311 2016. The Economic Development Element of the City's comprehensive plan will be amended to incorporate the findings, specific goals, strategies, and actions of the 10-year Economic Development Strategic Plan following City Council approval. Auburn's economic base drives and shapes the community and region. Auburn residents and the surrounding region benefit from the jobs and services Auburn's economic base offers. Through the payment of sales, property and other taxes, the City of Auburn can fund and provide services and public facilities which Auburn residents demand and/or require. It is clearly in the City's best interest to maintain and expand our economic base in unison with implementing all of the goals of this Comprehensive Plan. This section of the plan will help to define the City's goals and policies in this vital area. Values: Character: Our cultural diversity has been leveraged to bind our community, expand our market, and celebrate cultural traditions. Wellness: We are a safe community with walkable commercial districts where there the perception and reality is that crime activity is low and public safety staffing meets or exceeds the community's expectations. Service: Our economic development strategies focus on supporting the existing business community; as a result, recruitment is minimal because businesses desire to locate here. Economy: We are able to measure and achieve defined targets for manufacturing, service, and retail jobs and revenues. Celebration: We actively promote our local businesses and have been successful at making our citizens more aware of what is available locally as well as attracting visitors from beyond our City. Environment: Our economy is growing and diversifying because of our efforts to protect our rivers. • streams, wetlands, and other environmental resources. ORL ! x'310 of 751 P . ._. I3 DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 Sustainable: Residents are staying in Auburn to work and shop and we are widely considered to be a regional dining, shopping and entertainment destination. General Policies GOAL 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To ensure the long-term economic health of the City and the region through a diversified economic base that supports a wide range of employment opportunities for Auburn's residents and those of the region and through the promotion of quality industrial and commercial development which matches the aspirations of the community. Objective 9.1. Promote a diversified economic base capable of withstanding changes in interest rates, inflation, tax structure and market conditions. ED-1 City promotion of new industry shall be directed at attracting business that diversifies the City's tax base, offers secure, quality employment opportunities, is sensitive to community values and promotes the development of attractive facilities. ED-2 Emerald Downs, the Muckleshoot Casino. and the Outlet Collection offer opportunities for economic diversification that should be optimized by the City. ED-3 The importance of Downtown Auburn as a unique retail environment and subregional center of commerce should be considered in the City's economic plan. Objective 9.2. Produce commercial and industrial siting policies which are based on the assessment of local needs and the availability of transportation and other infrastructure required to serve it. ED-4 Development of industrial areas should be based on performance standards appropriate for the site and with appropriate flexibility within those standards to accommodate changing market conditions. ED-5 Revitalize depreciated and/or obsolete commercial and industrial sites through innovative regulations that redesign the site in accordance with modern design standards and industrial/commercial uses. ED-6 Uses which serve regional needs and purposes (such as major industrial plants) must be separated from community serving uses in order to minimize traffic and other conflicts. Objective 9.3. Develop effective land use polices and economic development strategies that provide long-term and stable employment. increase per capita income and reduce the tax burden of Auburn residents. ED-7 Auburn should continue to provide an economic base not only for the Auburn area but also for the south King County and north Pierce County region. ED-8 Implementation of economic development programs shall be consistent with the policies of this Plan. ED-9 The City should develop a formal economic development strategy as an element of the Comprehensive Plan to specifically identify the types of businesses most consistent with community aspirations and lay out a program to attract those businesses. a. The City should work cooperatively with other governmental agencies in its economic development efforts, including the Muckleshoot Tribe, King County, Pierce County. the Port and the State. ORD 11"212E-311 of 751 Page 14 DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 b. The City should implement its economic development strategy through a partnership with the private sector. 411 c. Identified in the 2005 Economic Development Strategies documents are six strategy areas along with two additional strategy areas. These economic development strategy areas are targeted for population and employment growth to meet the City's 20-year (2031) growth target. Sub-area plans should be developed for these strategy areas. The economic development strategy areas are as follows: • Auburn Way North Corridor • Auburn Way South Corridor • Urban Center • Auburn Environmental Park and Green Zone • 15'x, Street SW/C Street SW/West Valley Highway/Supermall • A Street SE Corridor • SE 312'h Street'124',Avenue SE Corridor • M Street SE between Auburn Way North and Auburn South ED-10 Ensure that economic development strategies are reviewed regularly in order to be flexible and respond to changes in the market. ED-11 The City should work with the private sector, school districts and Green River College to develop programs to provide training. Consideration of special needs of economically disadvantaged citizens and neighborhoods and people with physical impairments and developmental disabilities should be included in these programs. ED-12 Support continued development of the Sound Transit Commuter Rail system. as an important means of expanding the City's and the region's economic base. ED-13 City infrastructure plans and programs should take into consideration economic development plans and programs. ED-14 Implement the recommendations of the City's 2005 Economic Development Strategies brochure including the addition of the SE 312'x' Street/1241" Avenue SE corridor and M Street SE between Auburn Way North and Auburn Way South. The City's 20-year housing and employment growth shall be concentrated to these economic development strategy areas. ED-15 Warehouse and distribution land uses are not a preferred long-term economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas in the City due to the loss of sales tax revenue associated with the State's implementation of streamlined sales tax legislation in 2008, no substantive contribution to an increase in per capita income for Auburn residents, no reduction in the tax burden of Auburn residents, low employment densities, lower property values and land use inefficiencies. ED-16 Increases in manufacturing and industrial land uses should be the City's preferred economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas of the City currently dominated by warehouse and distribution land uses. The City should promote and incentivize new manufacturing and light industrial uses and the gradual conversion of existing warehouse and distribution land uses to manufacturing and industrial land uses. ED-17 To support continued sales tax revenue growth opportunities in the City, those areas currently dominated by existing and warehouse land uses that abut existing commercial retail areas and could take advantage of this proximity to realize substantive value by changing to commercial • ORD. 2 of 751 I5 DRAFT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 retail uses should be considered for changes in comprehensive plan and zoning designations that would facilitate the conversion of these properties to commercial retail land uses. ED-18 Regulatory and financial incentives will be identified and implemented where appropriate to provide increased opportunities and encouragement for the establishment of new or expanded manufacturing and industrial uses and jobs in the City. Objective 9.4 Maintain an adequate supply of land to support future economic development and assure the availability of economic opportunities for future generations. ED-19 Economic development programs should be viewed as a way to shape the character of the City's future economy rather than merely respond to market trends as they occur. ED-20 Land suitable for large scale development in the Region Serving Area of the City should be identified and designated for economic development. a. The integrity of large, contiguously owned properties suitable for industrial use should be conserved by use of appropriate industrial subdivision standards. b. The City should identify and resolve any environmental constraints affecting such land by means of the appropriate environmental review procedures as early as feasible. c. The need to support such land with the necessary infrastructure should be considered in the development of the City's public facility plans. d. Innovative and flexible development regulations should be utilized to enable the development of environmentally constrained sites while protecting those characteristics. Objective 9.5 Utilize the City's unique environmental opportunities and planned infrastructure to build on and support economic development efforts. ED-21 Integrate the Auburn Environmental Park (AEP) into the City's economic development efforts by encouraging compatible high tech businesses to locate in its vicinity. ED-22 Utilize the future extension of I Street NE as an economic development opportunity. Development of I Street NE should establish it as stand alone corridor and not a "back side" to Auburn Way North. Conditional use permit applications for commercial uses and nursing homes along this corridor and whose impacts can be adequately mitigated should be supported. ED-23 Use the M Street SE underpass and development of M Street SE and R Street SE bypass connection as an opportunity to create and encourage the clustering of complementary business and services in that area. OR[ ___ 3 of 751 16 Exhibit 9 AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - VOLUME 7 S Parks and Recreation Element PARKS AND RECREATION ELEMENT VISION A diverse mix of park and recreation amenities, open spaces, and trails are distributed throughout the City and accessible to the majority of the population. Non-motorized trails and paths connect residential neighborhoods, commercial centers, and other attractions. People are visiting Auburn because of the robust inventory and quality of park spaces and associated event programming. Community facilities are accessible and are serving the needs of our seniors,youth, and the rest of the community. INTRODUCTION Adequate parks and recreation facilities are an essential amenity to maintain a suitable quality of life in the community. As the population of Auburn grows. the demand for its parks and recreational programs will increase. To maintain Auburn's quality of life, the supply of these parks and programs must keep pace with the demand placed on them by a growing population. Open space also plays a key role in the quality of life in an area. While many understand the concept of the attraction of the western United States and its "open spaces", the concept of open space becomes less clear when it comes to open space and its appropriateness to a City such as Auburn. The policies below provide a definition of open space as applied to Auburn and its surroundings and provide a framework for the identification and preservation of these areas. Values: • Character - Parks, art, and open space are well designed and appropriately integrated into their surrounding community. Wellness - Recreation programs and park amenities are available and accessible to the entire community. Service - Awareness of parks, trails, the arts, and park programming are delivered to residents, employees and visitors through a thorough mix of media. Economy - Our parks. open spaces, and events are a draw to not only those who live and work in Auburn, but to those who reside outside of Auburn. Celebration - Our parks and open spaces are used to promote our history. our diversity, and the arts. Environment - Parks and open space are designed and operated in a manner that protects and preserves the environment. Sustainable - Park facilities incorporate low impact development and sustainable development and operation practices. General Policies Objective 1.1 To provide a broad and comprehensive park system that meets the recreational needs of all segments of the community. Policies: PR-1 The Auburn Park and Recreation Plan, as may be amended or updated in the future is hereby adopted and incorporated as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. ORD.E Page 314 of 751 DRAFT PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 PR-2 New developments shall contribute to the development of new parks at a level commensurate with their share of new facility needs as established by the Park and Recreation Plan. If the City determines that the development does not contain an acceptable park site, the City shall require the payment of cash in lieu of land. The funds shall be used to acquire land and/or develop recreational facilities at a location deemed appropriate by the City. Criteria for site acceptability and appropriateness shall be environmental limitations, accessibility, maintenance costs, consistency with the Parks and Recreation Plan and the ability to meet more of the Community's recreational needs by the coordinated development of parks located elsewhere. PR-3 The City shall explore all means of funding the purchase of park land including, but not limited to, bond issuance, the collection of cash in lieu of land and federal, state or county grants. PR-4 The City shall evaluate the impacts of new development on parks and recreational resources through the SEPA environmental review process, and shall take appropriate steps to mitigate significant adverse impacts. PR-5 The City recognizes the important recreational and transportation roles played by local and regional trail systems. The City shall continue to develop a system of separated trail facilities to move residents through our community and to adjoining communities. The local system should be designed to link up with regional trails and designated bicycle routes on roads. Safe routes along existing and proposed roadways should be improved and marked for cyclists. The City should continue to work with King County and other jurisdictions to maintain existing facilities and improve non-motorized transportation links. PR-6 The City shall continue to provide a broad variety of organized recreational and cultural opportunities for all residents. Consideration of the diverse interests and abilities of our residents shall be integral to the development of athletic, cultural, specialized recreation and leisure and educational programs and facilities offered or maintained by the City. PR-7 The City shall establish and implement Level of Service (LOS) standards for parks. park facilities, open space, and trails. PR-8 Park impact fees should be established that help fund the future development of new parks. park facilities, trails, and acquisition of open space that meet the needs of an increasing population. Objective 1.2 To provide for an adequate and diverse supply of open spaces. Open space is typically defined as land that will remain undeveloped or only lightly developed (a trail, for instance) and will be managed to protect and enhance the natural environment. Policies: PR-9 The City shall seek to retain as open space those areas having a unique combination of open space values, including: separation or buffering between incompatible land uses; visual delineation of the City or a distinct area or neighborhood of the City; productive wildlife habitat; wetlands; floodwater or stormwater storage; stormwater purification: recreational value; historic or cultural value: aesthetic value; and educational value. PR-10 The City shall seek to retain as open space areas where the soils have been identified as having severe or very severe erosion potential, landslide hazard or seismic hazard. PR-11 The City shall seek to retain as open space those areas that provide essential habitat for any rare, threatened or endangered plant or wildlife species. O R Lam=` gg'3'15 of 751 12 DRAFT PRIVATE UTILITIES ELEMENT NOVEMBER 10,2015 PR-12 The City shall seek to acquire open space lands which provide significant environmental or social value. Such open space shall be managed to conserve and improve the natural, visual, historic and cultural resources associated with the land. PR-13 All areas of Regulatory Floodway within the City shall be retained as undeveloped open space. However, this shall not preclude the relocation of the Mill Creek floodway as long as any such relocation is consistent with the requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program. PR-14 Development within areas designated for open space uses shall, in general, be non-intensive in character. Development shall be designed and sited in a manner that minimizes or mitigates disruption of the most important open space values of the site. Appropriate uses within designated open space areas may, include (but not necessarily be limited to): parks and other recreational facilities; agriculture; stormwater storage; and watershed. It is recognized that designating private property for open space uses does not establish or promote any public access rights to such property. PR-15 The City shall explore all means of open space acquisition including outright purchase of the land or the purchase of conservation easements. PR-16 The City shall pursue opportunities to provide active and passive recreational opportunities and enhance wetland and wildlife habitat within the Auburn Environmental Park generally located north of West Main Street, south of 15°i Street NW between SR 167 and the Interurban Trail. Grant funding and cooperative relationships with recreational and wildlife organizations shall be pursued to implement this policy. • 1111 ,.,.....,,, �._ �_u.,,_,_,.,. _��Y�_ Y.,u,._ 6 of 751 l3 Exhibit 10 • 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REFERENCED DOCUMENTS AND APPENDICES Referenced Documents • Auburn Comprehensive Water Plan • Auburn Comprehensive Sewer Plan • Auburn Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan • Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan • Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan • Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan • Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan Appendices: All Documents On File with the Auburn City Clerk's Office and at - http://www.auburnwa.gov/doing business/community development/planning/comprehensiv e plan/draft comp plan.htrn • Appendix A—Auburn Community Vision Report • Appendix B—Auburn Housing Needs and Assessment • • Appendix C—Auburn Housing Element Checklist • Appendix D—Auburn Health Impact Assessment • Appendix E —Auburn Public Participation Plan • Appendix F,1— King County Buildable Lands Analysis • Appendix F.2— Pierce County Buildable Lands Analysis • Appendix G —Auburn Airport Master Plan • Appendix H —Auburn Community Profile • Appendix I—Auburn Greenhouse Gas Inventory • Appendix J—Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Open Space Plan 41111 ORD.E Page 317 of 751 . ....kn::..,, '-:,....:e, _,...' ;.•,..."......‘1..:77,.1-:.:,';'-' ''',•!.'.;:::::‘,".•:--„da l•';,.''''''.7:1‘;_ - . . . . ... ... . . . .. - - .41'''.:'''r-..;iiiii...,.4%,...t.'-'•Y.. '• b,.-7•4(.6ff " •;:."...r-c- '. ...., -<-,-,4A.',efii• • '' ` --7'Cio.`," - • ' • .:';,+rjr4;,..!,.4,6ivh,- e's,..U4tt',14,,,:ts,,.-i. •,,,• , • - . . _ Exhibi . ., • „..- ...,......,.,.- .-.:•:.„ ,.-4.1.4i. ii.,,,..• •.••!...!-1:::,,,,-,s!-•. ,•' •'''''.'''.... .•" l'' ' • . . •;iitg.; • .'s.! -7::..' - • . ....._ , -1,. ir / '. • ..7.:.,•• -.. • • - ...?..- ..--1.1:1:9,4 • -- --- ,..0.•:', ... ' - ' - • ;. ••••.- ' .„'••A"V•;.-,. ;;,,t 4-'t •,.'•-- •-' ,7 . ... ... ., -f,t,; , ..,,,,,fe._,..8....:.„4-.,,-...;) - . ,,,,. •_. :,,,A;;;;- #4,.„ .i: ....,4 ,.7.,..tr.i.i.4,--...7,,. - ..74,t.----•,....• ••,.i :;jeckt- --"1-w.!,:c.... ...,..,-, , .,,, '' - -r,..:.-.•-•• ..,.,.../-, ;,,./40 :7,,,''• •• •. , 4...,IP••re• ' ' .!!' -• . ' 44. .• - , I r •„... ,„....,:.:14, ,...4-,............ ••10..,i:"..-10; •• .„... ...1„.../001(1 ',..,_,,.../•'?....3 '--,•7'''' 4/ ,,,-. - . •• wg ,, . . . .. .. • •4...., I °°ce ..- ..• ,i. 7 • • 1 ' . . ... • .!.4•,. • Q/1.414:47:: „ i,, -7..- t_.41.0111".•,et.,..... :...* 47 .7%)' '441'5 • 4•'., ....••r.,....„-• • "... • • _ ...e.-•. . •• -". , ... , ".••P,.• . " %.'1•1'...."---'1.... '-''' vi•e4f.. 'Y '''. ' ' ' . , 4,4-4 ''. , .17•7"°°' 21 „ 1 „( ' •-:••••-_,A,A l - 4•,/...t. . ,,,,..,„..7 . r; •,,,' ' •• , . • . • '' . . .1' '. .1. •• -. • 0 a •t, .....ffF .itifrt,,,,,,, ... ' ,,..,'• .•, - • ,-.. i ,,,,- ' .'. / •14• ...,-;•-i• '' •OT" -:- i,-; •It•••-- ' • AI-. . l'.'.. ..., - • * -,/- - •--.:'...' .. -v'-..44 ., ; '-..-- -;,- (.... , %:',. •._ .-. • „ ! ... K..' ,4 . • :-.'f,-:. - * t • '• - ;4,41.•-•'' • , ow,, • ., _. ,,.''..„I. • .1 4.- -.Ill• - ' 4, ..• fOXA,1., ----''''-t'.-''.',/.•-• '. ..., "..•?,.,'; • 4,170r.:''' ' 4-1 •- . ,..... :•1.41r,,i..., .. •.- • ,......- ... 1.P • • .- • L - • .. 4,,•,--;,--..7.... ,- -.• - - .4',... ../......„:•ipt.,....--..i. • A- . 1...N.. -,,- -4,... , . .1.: ,,: , • , .,. ,,, ,..•,,-...-..„,.:.,, ,•• . - . ...• . . , • . ...„0,-,..;,.., .. .. • iik- - • . , 7 .. , .. .. • 1 1. ' ..: • -;"" 4.7:::14'...-;g lk . PAFIKS A 116--..4.. %-.-',-, ,,,."......; 46 ,R. . ---: . . , -..... ,., ,..i., Ir. -,.....i.....:4'- •.:-..•. ',, ..",..- ..,_,... . :-. . . •' ., ' . - .'.-:t.ii,. ri°IN117. i; ." Tot?.A 1.'-' . • . •Zr--,4':;,* ,,,I•t4 •-•-•t;. .•- 111•• •• • •..'''•-. • ;'-'-T• -44•••- - r ' - ,{40i,l, • l• ,-, -0. -0. of. • • • . /". . 4 ..•• -.:' '• 1." -. .. -- • - . • , 4 7 , .1. . • 3•• -X.' ,.,,,t. -4--444,c.,..,,.;,1I-','.',:.‘,"•,is-.qr':.„'...-.,7,.A..r.„••,`.........-7'4, . . -, •..4,'.,''4/..*,!..7'11.:111.17Fi4' •r,..... .-•":::;r.'.‹i'''',• ....1'1..:,1i1i; ."- ,'..,-:.••'..;':,..'..•4-.`.7;.'"'.°,;40.4-.••4 - ' . •,' 1i - • 4 7 •-.-••--4.- -..#.2.V•,..1M•,•9••471q."..'..-i ,• '• .0 r; A. .. '..' ••':.‘ .1.4,t••• . ' - - ' • • •lk.h.- • '` C p- .*et:• • ., . -L.:.-7- ''',' ?. • • -- . -1.:*tiii, ? .1' . . Jyr -me* : '-'?.....t. - - " -'a• '• 7 .0/./ 4-••,.' ..-0,•••••4''A) ."- i,:- - --. • ., -%. -,74,,,,i.,A.,....,,:•,..-6 -.1e,„,4„1,,,,. -,,r. -..,-.,•, ,. 'i r-e _ ••.-. .;-.f, ,- ,....t,..-i - • )i • ,,,,d,„4, .,.,.!....„,„_. .,, . . ,, -3,„ . . ...._ . , .. .. ,„. 4 ..,... , t..-.. .," ,c , sr.• •#-;"'t ••"4-it.,1:•%1•,, '' ‘-'el •••, r-ef',• I.'''-'--,•"''.1_,-- .:-'471- ' .-4. - - •'' '''':it. • • • - Y,1*-*---- ' • - -.. - • , •i -.-. - ... , -. . ,...,.4, .i..,. , - ., .• • , .,.. ..r.„-.--.4.,,,,,.- ..• -.3 '.••::,,..f.',..::....f... ,..• ..2.41k. -71.,. ,. .., ,-,. .. .,...- e• 1;•.,.,.- •*•• ••.1.,-. - -,-.••••'..:!•• .."i'firsz....-. z ','-' '' .'''''''.-f • .',•:...-* - • - . '1, . --2TFF-tIt'.4r•s-le'A. • - • -• • .,..e. i . ' . -- -4ft•`-.. '''' •.---..- -I 4.,'.4' • \--,- .•...... -4...i .-'. 'fr- '' ' j:--44. :4'• :r.'." ,,,......„1/4444:::11140,,,:.,., J.,. ''.;. ' - . C -, ... ' - ....--.7'r.. . ::'7:*;:-7.' . „..,,,,a,......_. -. .- • .44.-11161...... t., . • • . -•••.rt, . Iv• _- ' • -- r••• • - '7,: ... . •i - - 4 . ./ .''.• .*q ••'... • ' - 1‘1""" - -' ....'' ,. , . it:. , . . . .• 1.. . ,... ... A • • . ''' -. 14 .. I'Nt, ., ,, . • ,A• •_, 1 a - :.. ... . , ' - • ......e: '',1''-it,5.-. . •• ••• ' • • . .' ,''. . ' ----.. • '''A. "'"+4.161.--... .• :1' • .;:i % • . ... • . - )....-- . i .. . .....-- j _, .... . - -,- ,:,•,'A-7......7 ..•••...•'!':, v V. _-. ...„7•• . -• .- ... .;•4 tr.' '''•.77 ‘••''. 'f- 7 ( '' • •••••• • ••'4i.3°- '••''°'' / . , ..46"."....:' . .. - - • .4. b IMO ,_ ...: 11l'i Irr.”",4111=1/4014.41. . ' '7'-' - ._ 7-7k4•-2- .01k 1 •' , .''''i l • %" ..: ._ - - - ' -••_ ._-•- . ...,--. '_. _ • - ,.-de,....'7:I • -...at?.-- "'-7--• • ''''• 4,, .• '4-64_, -. ..Nfr... • - ,.. .....,...-;..Fip., .4. .„.•:.? l'-- .• -/.49. •••,',„te 7. -• •••'o•••• ---- '*,,e•-•,•-••*44 ,.. ogr„. ,.. ,.-I i-is ....01-w i C •11•01 ----.4-.• ''11-1,. ! - - - -. -,,_ .,' , .•„,,. F• :-., ,, ,.. :4.,. ,._ ...- .... ilhir- ., is xplik. --f, •..._. , • , . .. _ .,_ -- . . ,. ,. 'tr.- ,,,,,iiir--,- -2.,••• ,..-'7--••-•7•`-••?-"Y'.04,31ij,•- 'kill- * - 4,+:, . ..-. :.• - ... „h. • - -** 1 .•4 °•=:';4° .• ' °.s, „...• ...,.- . . I, . . . r , . ... , .•,9 " . •• ..1';' -, . ...i. ... '4,4' .•r•, vc,.,. ,. ... . ..., . . • •,. _ ms--- i.•; .,..,. . .. .• ., _ .._,„,. :.!:.., ,,_ , .....--• , ,.... r -• f -. - •-,_. - -•'_ ,•'01i,c..-r. ''• - . li. '• '• '', , ,-'..-'••,'ro ....:- '',,,' . A • 7 . -f- -' ... .Ar, ...;• e,.'• ..., , .,;.0:4.,'",''''...' 1 '-' .... '... ' `. • -. ,-':,' `0,•'"• '-'2.111.. . '; _ ..• . ".-i,,t, ...'•'0. , -411 iti 4. i v:..• .', ' '.`,•,-.0-r _,'• . ...... ' lip, A •i ...:* *...."* 1. • • ".-'.*'.. .'S ...::' --..•.../.4....'''''kir., .-. ...6A. , 1., . . .•..4i',„;;J:•-•)(1,...:{i !,,,,.. ' .7::.:,•-:.;,. ,, '`k%. ';•';;;...5:-.'..!_....-., 40.4 ---. • I, ... O. 4,- •.•:: , ,,f;',...; . ,., r f:'.,., ;kT,.;...... -, . or ow m". ..•-..... so . - ' ••••'':.43,:. - • '.);:•-:-..,-,..-...f......,..---...- --.- . - ,. . ,....- I/am 'm .... . . .." -.... -- '4ii/,: .4.,-,,;v", •••4 ••,.../.. .6. •,- .. • ___......00r-% .--;".1 ,*-. 7•, i'4'13;" °, .,' If ''''<1..',.. .., '' '.'•••t;'r 1-. , ...... - ' A. i '• _.., - 'ig:e C..71 •• ., '• .,,,'7 • •.,4'' ` . ' '12,-••° •4,,4 - i.1•kk_1; '':''c'-- '**- "-fi, • '''`., - ..... " .0 - . NOVEMBER 2015 ..-:-.4;i:,-, - •.•- ..,,.:- i.::,.... g.,, r• •. _t....,..,,i/$1...,if• - . - , ...,..--. -.1..,,,._ • . . .. ....,..., -,;i:i,,,.-.--.•,... -....... .--•,.,, :. -,-,,..-- -- ,..4..: .--.4'4,- , ..v. c• r% •••••• A • ., lin • - . . . ,. ._..: • "A".. ; .1' • •,.. '',.. ,• .. - '''' ... ,*4...,-......, , . '-.-`7.• y,;• .• - . .. . '. ,J 1 471 DRAFT ` '' - ` •- , , : -- ,pr , TABLEOFCONTENTS +,., , * , : - Chapter 1:Who Are We;What is a Parks Plan? ? • -•lirr. �. _ Chapter 2: Our Auburn Community ' + = • Demographic Information • .A `' • Geographic Setting and Natural Resources ` ii.tit • History of the Area :: '_, r+ ;�j .4•.-«_� yam,l �. •� is Chapter 3: Public Involvement +� • Public Participation Process .... z,,. L• . • Public Survey ' ''-:a, �e • Recreation Needs Assessment .44,0,..- • Existing & Future Park Land Needs • Facility Needs =` _,_ -' '. ;:•-- thet e'r ",-. �4• "y' Chapter 4: Goals and Policy ... 1 • Chapter 5: Our Park System Today t }� •nventorY& Recommendations ,� + • Community Parks • Neighborhood Parks ,,.`, t Y • Special Use Areas �-'" �' • Undeveloped Open Space -.•:-. • . •1 , iti Chapter 6: Recreation and CulturalArea -. . 1. • Athletic Programs - • Leisure and Education Programs ..k ____ 1 "i...' • Health &Wellness Programs - • Heritage and Preservation Programs / \. \• Cultural Programs: Arts & Events �� I / 1 \ \ Chapter 7: Open Space Defines a Community I ..___ Chapter 8: Auburn Trails T - • MUM illIMMINC4.c.0411111k , Chapter 9: Getting It All Done 1:. - • Park and Open Space Needs • Recreation Facility& Program Needs • Financing Improvements "0 ._f 10 r...1,-.. .-....- : ORD.E ... Chapter 1 : Who Are We; What is a Parks Plan ? • Chapter 1 Who are We What is a Parks Plan? The complex puzzle of the Parks and Recreation Department properties, programs and people are demanding jobs. It is accomplished through the joint efforts of six citizen boards, 50 permanent City staff members, approximately 50 seasonal workers, more than 100 part-time or contract instructors, coaches and recreation support staff, and more than 500 volunteers. The following pages describe each of these groups. Working together, they see our parks are attractive and well-maintained and the programs meet the needs of Auburn residents. The Auburn Parks and Recreation Department From a modest two person staff in 1969, the Parks and Recreation Department has developed a comprehensive program of recreation, heritage and cultural arts activities, park maintenance and new park development keeping a full-time staff of over 50 very busy. The Parks Department consists of eight divisions, each of which is responsible for a specific type of task. The divisions are: Administration Golf Course • Arts and Events White River Valley Museum and Mary Olson Farm Mountain View Cemetery Park Facilities and Maintenance Recreation Programs Senior Activity Center A short synopsis of the responsibilities of each division follows; some of these are described in more detail in other sections of the Park Plan. Administration The Administrative staff consists of the Parks and Recreation Director, the Parks Planning and Development Manager and administrative staff. The Director oversees the activities of the entire department, and reports directly to the Mayor. Golf Course The Auburn Golf Course is a full service 18-hole golf facility nestled along the Green River and situated on 150 acres. City services include a full service pro shop, tournament and league organization and scoring, golf club and power cart rentals, professional instruction and lessons, tournaments and leagues. The City of Auburn leases out the beautiful restaurant and banquets • ORD.E Page 321 of 751 facility to an outside concessionaire. The concessionaire provides a full service restaurant and bar menu as well as a overseeing a banquets/event space that hold up to 150 persons. The concessionaire also operates the beverage carts on the golf course. The City of Auburn employees 8 full time employees and approximately 10 temporary workers to assist with the overall operation. Arts and Events Arts programming includes five major programs and events. These are community art programs, access, facilities, education, and resources for artists and organizations. The Cultural Programs Manager, with the assistance of the Cultural Programs Coordinator and part time arts assistant, manages this expanding program. A substantial group of volunteers assists at performances, major events, and support. White River Valley Museum and Mary Olson Farm The White River Valley Museum is the City's central site for heritage and arts enrichment and educational programming. It is located in the Auburn Community Campus in Les Gove Park. The Museum is managed through a partnership of the City of Auburn and the White River Valley Historical Society. The Museum was built and furnished by the White River Historical Society. The City pays the wages of a fulltime Museum Director, a .5 FTE Curator of Collections, a fulltime Curator of Education and a % FTE Assistant Educator. The Director is responsible for the overall administration of the facility and reports to the Director of Parks Arts and Recreation. The Historical Society earns revenue to pay for a .4 FTE Volunteer and Facility Coordinator, a .75 FTE Bookkeeper. Volunteers and volunteers provide much of the help needed to maintain the collection and provide visitor services. Since 2001 the Historical Society has leased the built environment of the Mary Olson Farm (a City of Auburn Park) for the purposes of restoration and programing. Through this partnership the Farm is now fully restored and open summer weekends for drop in visitors. It is the site of an extensive fieldtrip program wherein 1000s of students learn about stream ecology and food production. Mountain View Cemetery This public cemetery is well-known for its lovely site and outstanding views of Mount Rainier and the Green River Valley. Cemetery staff maintain the 30-acre site and are responsible for an average of 275 urn and 275 full burials a year. Five full-time staff and three seasonal workers maintain and operate the Cemetery. Park Facilities and Maintenance The Maintenance division is responsible for the care and renovation of 38 City park properties, more than 30 street right-of-way beautification areas, and the grounds at all Municipal Buildings including City Hall, the Justice Center, Parks and Recreation Administration Building, ORD.E Page 322 of 751 Museum, Les Gove Multi-Purpose Building, Veterans Park Kitchen Building, Senior Activity • Center, and the Auburn Valley Humane Society. In the downtown Auburn business area they maintain the grounds of 8 City owned parking lots, 144 hanging baskets and all of the landscape beds along Main Street and Division. This division employs 15 full-time staff with an additional position to be added in 2016, and 12 seasonal workers. Recreation Auburn's Recreation Division provides opportunities for the public to participate in diverse recreational programs and activities designed to meet the needs of the community. These programs include preschool, youth, teen, and adult leisure programs; youth, teen, and adult athletics; fitness and wellness programs; programs designed to provide social and recreational opportunities to senior citizens and those with special needs, and a host of special events suitable for the entire family and community at large. The division also offers a gymnasium for open gym and organized activities, and several options for facility rentals, including buildings, picnic shelters, and fields. The Recreation Division is under the direction of one manager, five Recreation Coordinators, one Recreation Specialist, a Recreation Clerk, dozens of temporary staff and contracted instructors, and hundreds of volunteers. Senior Activity Center The Senior Activity Center provides recreation, education, health, nutrition and outreach services and legal information to citizens, age 50 and older. This is accomplished with 3.5 full- time staff, and more than 20,000 hours of volunteer assistance using approximately 180 volunteers. Public Input to the Parks & Recreation Department Seven committees, comprised of Auburn residents, provide input to the Department on a regular basis. These are the Parks and Recreation Board, the Senior Center Advisory Council, the Urban Tree Board, the Cemetery Board, and the Auburn Arts Commission, and the White River Valley Museum Board. Additionally, the Library Board, the Auburn Youth Council, the Men's and Women's Clubs at the Golf Course give direct input to the Department regarding its divisions. These committees provide the public voice ensuring activities carried out by the Department meet the needs of a broad-based constituency. Park and Recreation Board Advises the Mayor and City Council on planning, development, acquisition and management of City parks, recreation facilities and programs. The Parks and Recreation Board consists of seven members who serve three-year terms. Regular meetings are held the Tuesday following the first Monday of each month at 5:30 PM at the Auburn Senior Activity Center located at 808 9th St SE, Auburn. Senior Activity Center Advisory Council • ORD.E Page 323 of 751 The Senior Activity Center Advisory Council is a 17-member committee appointed by the Senior Center Supervisor. It serves as a sounding board, helping staff to make decisions on Center services and activities and on general operation of the facility. The group meets monthly to evaluate recent activities, give input on current and future programs, and review suggestions from Center participants. Members serve a two-year term with half of the group rotating out each year to allow continuity in the group. The Senior Center Advisory Board normally meets the third Tuesday of each month at 10:00 AM at the Senior Activity Center, 808 Ninth St. SE. Urban Tree Board Through education and involvement, the Tree Board of the City of Auburn provides information and advocacy for "choosing the right tree for the right place," helping Citizens understand the value of proper pruning techniques and in managing an urban forest that is ever changing and needs to fit into the environment of this community. Board emphasis is on trees in public rights-of-way and on City-owned property. The Board is made up of five members who serve three-year terms. Regular meetings of the Board are held the first Tuesday following the first Council meeting of the month in the Parks Admin Building at 910 9th St. SE, Auburn. Cemetery Board Advises the Mayor and City Council on policy matters relating to long range planning, capital improvements, fee structure, cemetery expansion, rules and regulations, and budget for the cemetery. The Board consists of five members who serve five-year terms. Regular meetings of the Board are held the second Tuesday of each even-numbered month at 2:00 PM at Mountain View Cemetery located at 2020 Mountain View Drive, Auburn. Arts Commission Within its funds appropriation, the Arts Commission may, alone or in cooperation with any other private, civic or public body of any city, county or the State of Washington, initiate, sponsor or conduct programs calculated to further public awareness of and interest in the visual, cultural and performing arts. The Board consists of twelve members who serve three- year terms. Regular meetings of the Commission are held the first Tuesday of the month at 4:30 PM in Conference Room 1 located on the first floor of the City Hall Annex, One Main Building. White River Historical Society Board Develops policies for White River Valley Museum operations and management of collections, long-term plans for the Museum, and docent programs and other volunteer activities. Board membership is comprised of nine members elected by the general membership of the Historical Society, and eight members are appointed by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. ORD.E Page 324 of 751 • Regular meetings of the Board are held the third Wednesday of each month at 1:30 PM at the White River Valley Museum Muckleshoot Room, located at 918 H Street SE, Auburn. Why a Park Plan? The Growth Management Act (GMA) establishes goals for cities and counties to assure that their quality of life is sustained as their communities grow. One of these goals is to "retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreational facilities" (RCW 36.70A.020(9)). Every few years the City of Auburn looks at its parks and its recreation programs and evaluates how well they're working and how they can be improved. The last plan was written in 2005, and many changes have occurred in Auburn since then. Between 2004 and 2014 (Population data for 2014 is an estimate) our population grew by nearly 40%, and constructed over 3,938 new homes and apartments. The demand for recreational space increases with the population. In addition, more flexible work schedules mean the parks are no longer just a weekend destination. Our city parks are used from dawn to dusk, seven days a week, by people of all ages. All these things continue to add up to a system of parks that are heavily used and enjoyed. Periodic improvements and renovations of existing parks, as well as additions to the park system, are necessary to meet the needs of new and old users alike. This plan is intended to update the current Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan and assess recreation trends and needs of our residents and user groups. It will focus on what can be achieved over the next six years, and will be tied to the City's Capital Facilities Plan. This will enable park project funding and development to be coordinated with other City and Community projects. There are four objectives to be achieved through the production of this plan: 1. Provide guidance for the Parks and Recreation Department 2. Provide input to the citywide Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) 3. Maintain funding eligibility for grants 4. Comply with the Growth Management Act • ORD.E Page 325 of 751 1. Provide guidance for the Parks and Recreation Department in the following areas: • park and open space land acquisition • recreation facility development, and • recreation program development The planning process used in this document evaluates the property for which the Parks Department is responsible and the recreational programs it sponsors. The Plan makes specific recommendations for the present and near future, and general recommendations for the longer term. Information gained in this process will determine whether additional parks are needed, where future demand is expected to occur, and where land should be acquired to meet current and future needs. It will also provide information about the changing general recreation interests of Americans, and Auburn residents specifically. This process provides direction for the continuing success of our many recreation programs. 2. Provide input to the citywide Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The City of Auburn maintains, and periodically updates, a coordinated plan for providing and financing major public facilities. These are projects that require a substantial investment of money and planning to complete. The construction of all new parks, and the substantial renovation of any existing parks, are included in the CFP where they are evaluated against other City needs, such as construction of new sewer lines or development of a new fire station. Based on available budget and urgency of need, each project in the CFP is given a priority and assigned a date when it is anticipated to be accomplished. The Park Plan prioritizes the large scale investments needed for parks and open spaces for the years to come. 3. Maintain funding eligibility for grants. Most sources of county, state and federal funding for parks and recreation facilities require funded projects be reflected within an up-to-date park plan. This ensures such funds are used efficiently and for projects with clearly recognized benefits. Examples of such funding sources include the Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO), and the King County Conservation Futures Fund. The continued ability to successfully compete for outside funding is critical to our ability to provide an excellent park system. 4. Comply with the Growth Management Act (GMA) The Growth Management Act passed in 1991 recommends cities and counties develop recreation plans that complement the expected land development pattern of the community. The Land Use element of the Comprehensive Plan requires the identification of existing and future public facilities, such as parks and trails. The Growth Management Act also requires us to "identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas." They include lands useful for recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connection of critical areas." 5. Develop Implementation & Funding Strategy The Plan outlines the needed park, art, and recreation facilities for the future in the City of Auburn. Funding strategies of the current sources and those needed in the future are noted in ORD.E Page 326 of 751 the Plan. The Implementation section of the Plan guides park development and improvements by answering the questions of; where, when, and estimated costs as they relate to the CIP. Currently only developments over 50 units provide park land or fee in lieu of park land. Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) dollars, State and Federal grants, and donations provide the only funding sources for parks acquisition and development. Potential Funding sources for parks and programming include: • Capital Improvement Plan • Special Serial Levy • General Obligation Bond • Revenue Bond • HUD Block Grants • Park Impact Fees • Park Mitigation Fees • Certificate of Participation • Private Utility Tax • Councilmanic Bond • Donations • Public Land Trusts • Lifetime Estates • Exchange of Property • Joint Public/Private Partnership • • Private Grants and Foundations • Urban Forestry Grants • National Tree Trust • Parks, Arts, and Recreation Organizations • Municipal Art Fund • Miscellaneous Grants Managed by RCO • Land and Water Conservation Fund • Aquatic Lands Enhancement Account • Washington State Arts Commission Grant • National Endowment for the Arts • Hotel/Motel Tax • Conservation Futures Strategy The Park and Recreation Board, and the City Council will implement a priority list for establishing funding for the next 6 years of this Park Plan. What's Happened Since 2005? Over the course of the last decade the City's inventory of parks properties has expanded. The list of parks and park properties that have been added include West Auburn Lake, 104th Ave SE • ORD.E Page 327 of 751 property along the Green River, 21st Street Playground, Dorothy Bothell, Kersey A, Kersey B, Riversands, and Lakeland Nature Area. In addition Lea Hill Park and the Discovery Playground were constructed since the last Park Plan update. Notable redevelopment efforts and renovations have taken place at the Auburn Golf Course, Brannan Park, Fulmer Fields, Game Farm Park, GSA Fields, Isaac Evans Park, Dykstra Park, Indian Tom Park, Cedar Lanes Park, Rotary Park, Terminal Park, Veteran's Memorial Park, Roegner Park, and Les Gove Park, and Mountain View Cemetery,. How This Plan is Organized Updating the existing Park and Recreation Plan is not difficult due to the good ground work done in past years by the City Council, the Parks and Recreation Board and parks and recreation staff, its complexity arises due to the many facets which must be examined and digested in order to produce a useful document. Major Findings of this Plan Although this plan and its recommended actions are fairly detailed, it can be summarized in a few major points: 1. Take care of our existing inventory of parks and facilities; 2. Expand our park system to meet the needs of our growing population,; 3. Ensure open spaces are maintained, both for the quality of life that they add to our community, and their environmental and wildlife value; 4. Continue to strive to meet the varied recreation needs of all segments of the population; and 5. Prioritize and find funding sources to maintain the current level of services that the Parks Department provides prior to taking on new facilities. The following items look at each goal in slightly expanded detail. The remainder of the Plan can be referred to for more in-depth coverage of each topic. 1. Continuing Care for Existing Parks: Auburn residents overwhelmingly felt existing parks should receive highest priority. Chapter 5, Our Park System Today, discusses each park individually and provides recommendations for improvement. The review of existing parks finds our park system is reaching an age when both minor and major renovations are needed. The Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires the City of Auburn make parks accessible to all persons. Maintaining aesthetics and keeping up with the times were strong factors in determining the recommended renovations in this plan. These include improvements such as landscaping, water conservation irrigation systems, and new site furnishings. 2. New Parks and Facilities: To help assess the wants and needs of the citizens of Auburn we conducted an online Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey of 600 Auburn residents in Spring 2015. Although there is some similarities between different communities, standards are individualized to meet the unique needs and interests of the local population. The standard for park acres currently in the City of Auburn is 6.03 acres per 1000 residents. This will maintain our ORD.E Page 328 of 751 • neighborhood, community and linear parks at their current level. Although Auburn has some of the best recreation facilities in the area, our recent population growth are placing pressure on existing resources. A critical lack of indoor facilities is restricting the City's ability to provide a complete range of recreation programs and opportunities. The plan and staff recommends minimum development of the following recreation facilities to meet current demand: • 119 Acres of Community Park space • 11 Softball and youth baseball fields • 2 Soccer/Football fields • 10 gymnasiums • Recreation/transportation trails to connect the different planning areas of the City (i.e. West Hill, East Hill, and SE Auburn), All standards and descriptions of current and future needs for parks and the facilities are fully detailed in Chapter 3, The Community Attitude & Interest Citizen Survey and Park Board and staff recommendations. 3. Open Space: The topic of open space is included in the City of Auburn Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. This is partially in response to the Growth Management Act, which requires we plan for open space, but is also in response to local interest in maintaining green spaces and environmentally sensitive areas. The plan for open space outlined in Chapter 7 and proposes a new Open Space Program that would seek to conserve significant natural resources, and in some cases acquire and manage land as open space. A system of greenbelts which • interconnect and provide travel corridors for people and/or wildlife is recommended. 4. Meeting the Recreation Needs of All Residents: The City can offer a broad range of classes, activities, league sports and community events appealing to persons of all ages and abilities. An overview of the recreation programs currently offered by the City reveals an excellent series of programs hampered by a lack of space. The construction of a community center, which will be completed in Summer 2106, is critical to the continued development of recreation programming in Auburn. A few of the identified recreational needs for the community include improved programming for youth, a wider selection of adult classes and activities, and expanded programs for the diverse needs of retirees and senior citizens, who now range from age 55 to 95. Space needs are also high on the list: • Activity areas for teens, multipurpose space for classrooms, and exercise rooms for aerobics/fitness • Gallery space, studio space, rehearsal space, and small performance areas • Community meeting rooms/classrooms • Walking and running areas • ORD.E Page 329 of 751 The Challenge Ahead Accomplishing the tasks laid out in this Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan are a continuation of the existing Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan. Many of the actions recommended are already underway. The key to achieving the large vision is to continue to identify what needs to be done, and to begin methodically executing those tasks. This plan begins to identify and prioritize the tasks. The recommendations and conclusions found in Chapters 3 through 8 are compiled and summarized in Chapter 9, and for some this will be a logical starting point. Others may want to know the whys and hows of the plan's development and then the conclusions. It is recommended you read straight through the plan. ORD.E Page 330 of 751 • 13 LANK • PA G E • ORD.E Page 331 of 751 Chapter 2 : Our Auburn Community • Chapter 2 Our Auburn Community Parks -- Creating Community through People, Parks and Programs In making decisions about the future direction of our parks, open spaces, and recreation programs, it is vital to know something about who we are. The age of our citizens, where they live, their hobbies and recreational interests, and our predicted population growth—all of these facts and trends inform us how our recreational spaces and programs can be designed to serve the city's diverse population. This chapter concentrates on two of Auburn's most important resources: its people and its land. Both are vital to the decision making process. Who our citizens are will influence their preferences and expectations for recreational opportunities. And the geographic setting serves as the "canvas" upon which we can design our system of parks and open spaces. Planning Area The plan for this study includes all areas within the city limits of Auburn. Parks located in nearby • unincorporated areas are discussed briefly in order to understand how the City's system fits into the broader context of the region, however development of these parks do not usually occur outside the existing City limits. Community Profile and Population Changes Population Estimates (chart) Population figures for 1990, 2000 and 2010 are based on actual counts of persons in each household. In each of the intervening years our population figures are estimates reviewed by the Washington State Office of Financial Management. Population numbers are not updated each year for the various categories discussed in the remainder of this section, therefore 2010 figures will be used to discuss who our residents are. Auburn 1990 33,102 2000 40,314 2010 70,180 2014 76,347* 2025 84,948* 2030 89,868* 2035 94,788* *projected estimates Every ten years the U.S. Bureau of the Census performs a detailed population count of all residents of the United States. Data from the 2010 Census reveals a great deal of information • ORD.E Page 333 of 751 about who we are. One of the most basic pieces of data provided by the Census, which is useful to cities, is the overall population count. For example, the Census shows Auburn's population increased from 40,314 in 2000 to 76,347 in 2014. (See note about population estimates in side- bar) Recent growth, as well as projected growth, is attributable mainly to annexations and/or the construction of new housing in the recently annexed areas. If Auburn continues to grow at its current rate, and if it incorporates its potential annexation areas as planned, then by the year 2035, its population will be approximately 94,788 people. Other 2010 Census data relevant to this Park Plan, which will be considered in the decision-making process, are listed below: • Population by Age Group • Households by Type • Population by Race • Housing • Income Population by Age Group The population is measured in increments of five years of age, from 0 to 85+. Each of these increments shows an increase in numbers.. Much like the 2000 Census data, the 2010 data indicates that the largest increases in population group was 35-60 year-old adults. Significance of Age Groups for the Park Plan: Recreation programming adjusts by specific age groups, as population increases and decreases in the various segments. Auburn's large population of children, from infants to nine year-olds in 2010, will affect our recreation programming for years to come. Increased numbers of recreation classes, or an increase in class size, may be necessary to meet the needs of this group as they mature. The same is true of adults, ages 35 to 60. As our middle aged and older populations experienced the largest increases in growth, it continues to be necessary to provide additional programming that meets the specialized interests of these groups. Family Composition Families composition (with and without children) comprise the largest segment of Auburn's population. In the year 2010 Census, Auburn had a total of 26,051 households. Families with children comprise just over one-third of Auburn's total households. Population by Race Auburn's population is almost 79% white. Although this is a majority, the number and percentage of people of color is increasing in Auburn. Between 1980 and 2000 total figures for people of color almost tripled, from 1,611 individuals to 6,932. The greatest increase in actual numbers was in the Latino and Native American category, while the largest percentage increase was in the Latino population. Although not strictly a consideration of racial composition, staff ORD.E Page 334 of 751 observation and immigration trends reveal that this part of King County is seeing a larger • increase in Latino residents. Significance of Racial Composition for Park Plan: Facilities should be designed to take advantage of different cultural interests and histories. Possible facilities and programs are: • Educational programs that acknowledge ethnic differences and celebrate diversity. • Events that celebrate traditional holidays and occasions of the Muckleshoot Indians, Latino, Black, and Asian populations. • Facilities designed using the artwork of, or in the historical style of, one or more of these cultures. Housing Auburn's 131% population growth increase in the 24 years between 1990-2014 means that there is also a significant increase in new home construction. Much of this construction is in multi-family units, in mobile homes and manufactured housing. The city has a total housing stock of about 26,051 dwelling units in 2010, which is a 59% increase in the total number of housing units since the year 2000. In 2000, 46% of Auburn's housing units are single family, 42% are multi-family and 12% are mobile homes. According to the Year 2010 Census, the number of owner-occupied housing units was just under 60% and the number of renters was about 40%. • Significance of Housing for Park Plan: Increases in multi-family housing and decreases in average house lot size mean that most people have smaller yards or no yard at all. For some this is an advantage, but for those with young children or with active recreational interests, it means that public parks and open spaces become even more vital. As a result, the following will be needed: • New parks to meet the demands of increasing population numbers. • Developer impact fees paid by each new household to contribute to the additional new park space that will be needed or parks will be developed to meet city standards. • Connecting routes to the natural environment from new residential development via an open space/trail system. Income Table 2-1 Median Household Income—2010 Auburn King County $55,483 $71,811 • ORD.E Page 335 of 751 Household income levels in Auburn are one of the lowest in King County; however, the city also has some of the lowest housing costs in the county. Table 2-1, using data from the 2010 census, shows the difference in income between Auburn and King County. Auburn also has a substantial number of households that fall into the low and very low income categories. More than 53% of households in Auburn are considered "low income", which is defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as a household with a total yearly income equal to, or less than, 80% of the King County median household income. "Very low income" is defined as a household with an income equal to, or less than, 50% of the King County median household income. About 31.7% of Auburn households fall into the very low income category. Significance of Income Levels for the Park Plan: Data shows that people with lower incomes tend to recreate less than those with higher incomes. However, it may also be true that populations with less financial flexibility need local recreational resources more than those who can afford vacations outside the city or state. The City may respond to the needs of our less affluent citizens with some of the following methods: • Recreational and educational programs designed to meet special needs, such as: 1. Scholarships for needy participants, which are based on family income and are available at 100%, 75%, 50% and 25% levels. The Parks and Recreation Department may want to evaluate this existing program to see if it is sufficient to meet the needs of Auburn residents. 2. An increased number of"no-cost" or "low-cost" programs 3. Programs devoted to improving skills or money management 4. Child care during evening programs, especially those oriented to low income or single-parent households. 5. Continuation and expansion of free community sponsored events • It may be advisable to expand programs for special population groups such as teens, the developmentally disabled, and senior citizens, and include exploration of providing transportation, on-site counseling and mental health services, adult day care, expanded health services and more. • Good geographic distribution of parks throughout the community will be especially beneficial to low-income families. Parks are ideally located within walking distance of most residential neighborhoods. Geographic Setting Auburn's location in the Puget Sound region has a great influence on the City as it exists today and in the future. Originally, geography was a driving force in the development of the region. Auburn's proximity to rivers made it an early transportation center for both Native Americans and settlers. As the fertile valley began to be farmed, train tracks were installed to move ORD.E Page 336 of 751 • important food crops and timber from the rural towns, like Auburn, to the larger cities of Tacoma and Seattle. In the 1990s, Auburn's south King County location made it a prime target for growth as the entire Puget Sound region experienced a rapid influx of new residents. Auburn's 1990 population, of approximately 30,000, took a 131%jump to over 76,347 in 2014. Although population is not expected to continue growing at this rate, Auburn is still seen as a desirable community in which to live due to its image as a family-oriented small town. Its low real estate costs, compared with most of King County, its ease of access to highways and its small town atmosphere will continue to attract steady growth. This growth will create a continuing need for recreation facilities. Topography Topography refers to the configuration of surface features of the land—from minor changes in elevation to riverbeds, mountains and other natural features. Topography is significant because it affects how and where human activity occurs. Flat, dry areas were traditionally developed first. These kinds of sites easily accommodate the construction of houses, roads and other structures. They are also well suited to park development, which often requires broad, flat expanses for the development of sports fields and other recreation facilities. Hills, steep slopes and poorly drained soils pose construction challenges for both parks and other uses. The dominant topographical features of Auburn consist of a broad, flat valley bordered on the east by the Green River and Lea Hill, with the West Hill forming the western edge of the city. These hillsides create distinctive edges that contain immediate views within the city, but still allow unobstructed views of the Cascades and Mount Rainier. The hillsides also create barriers for physical connections between the various districts of the City. The White River in the southern part of the city creates an edge between the more developed portion of the city and the more rural. The city has followed a typical pattern of development, with growth occurring in the valley in the early days of settlement, and in the recent past. Most city parks are also located on sites in the central valley. As this area reaches its capacity for development, development activities have shifted to the recently annexed areas in the western, eastern, and southern portions of the City. Significance of Topography for the Park Plan: While the slopes of some hillsides are too steep and unstable for construction of conventional park facilities, they may be suitable for open space designation or non-motorized trails. Topographic constraints are not an issue in the remaining unoccupied valley locations, which might be considered for park sites. In the west part of the valley floor, wet soils and high ground water are common, making development of these sites more difficult. These conditions would, however, allow some interesting opportunities for pedestrian scale recreation and education. Drainage • ORD.E Page 337 of 751 Auburn has a system of rivers and creeks that are valuable for their drainage, flood control, fish and wildlife habitat, visual interest, historical value, and recreational opportunities. The Green River, White River, Mill Creek, Bowman Creek, Olson Creek, Mill Pond and White Lake all provide fascinating glimpses into Auburn's past. The integral role that these bodies of water played in earlier decades has changed over the years, but is no less valuable. Mill Creek, in west Auburn, is a small stream that passes through open wetlands, retired pastures, and fields. Earlier in the century, portions of the Mill Creek channel were realigned and redesigned to accommodate farming activities. With the demise of farming here, Mill Creek is returning to its original drainage function. The presence of wetlands along much of its corridor precludes extensive development, although some industrial properties are already present. Although historically the alignments of the rivers were altered by human activity, and the banks were engineered to contain the river during flood events, multiple levee setback projects within the City have created areas that are appropriate for linear pedestrian trails. White Lake and West Auburn Lake are the only naturally occurring lakes or ponds in the city. West Auburn Lake was recently acquired by the City and represents a recreational opportunity for a natural area in a highly urbanized area. White Lake, located just south of Highway 18 is presently in private ownership and not available for public use. Should the area eventually be developed, White Lake would be a very desirable recreation amenity. Significance of Drainage for the Park Plan: In the past couple of decades the City has begun to take advantage of the recreational opportunities provided by these drainage areas, with the construction of Isaac Evans Park on the Green River, and Game Farm Park, Game Farm Wilderness Park, Reddington Trail along the Green River and Roegner Park on the White River. Public access and future park development along the rivers continue to be priorities of the City. A summary of potential projects utilizing naturally occurring drainage ways include: Roegner Park which connects to Game Farm Wilderness Park by a trail that runs alongside the river. Continuation of the trail from Roegner Park to 'A' Street and eventually to the Interurban Trail is being considered. A master site plan by King County, which is being utilized to develop a regional trail along the Green River. Currently the Green River Trail extends from Cecil Moses Memorial Park in Tukwila to North Green River Park in South Kent. The hope is that if the trail is extended to S. 277th Street that it can be extended through Auburn and beyond. Due to private property along the River the section of trail through Auburn presents some challenges, but surface streets could be used to bridge the expected gaps. ORD.E Page 338 of 751 • Mill Creek, which provides an opportunity for a system of recreational activities along its length, from pedestrian trails or boardwalks to educational interpretive sites. Property acquisition, park planning and programming of the Auburn Environmental Park as well as Mill Creek restoration efforts should continue. This future site will include connections to the Interurban Trail and environmental, educational, interpretive signage describing the fish, plants, wetlands, and bird migration patterns. Vegetation Historically, 80% of the trees in this region were Douglas fir, with western red cedar, black cottonwood, western hemlock and Sitka spruce present in smaller amounts. This naturally occurring vegetation in Auburn was largely replaced as land came into use for farming, housing, commerce and industry. Exceptions are the wooded hillsides, and the wooded corridors along the Green and White Rivers. Many of these locations were cut for timber years ago and now are second and third growth woodlands. In the valley's more developed portions of the city and in the city parks, ornamental and introduced species predominate. Wetlands in the west part of the valley vary in composition from tree/shrub combinations of willow, dogwood, blackberries and black cottonwood to non- tidal marshes consisting primarily of grasses and rushes. Vegetation along the larger rivers consists primarily of black cottonwood with an occasional red alder and several varieties of deciduous tree species. • Significance of Vegetation for the Park Plan: All of these natural elements provide unique educational and recreational opportunities. They are also different visually, and each provides visitors with a different experience. Possible ways to incorporate vegetation into the educational and recreational experience include: • Install signage about the natural history of Auburn and the Puget Sound in several park locations throughout the city, each providing its own distinctive environment. • While existing and proposed parks already encompass the river environment, explore the wetlands and forested hills as two other natural environments that could be used for possible park sites. • Reintroduce native species, particularly in less urban parks. Not only are these varieties generally low maintenance and disease resistant, they also provide valuable wildlife food and habitat. History From its beginnings, Auburn was a crossroads. Tribal groups such as the Skopamish, Smalhkamish, and Stkamish lived along the intersecting rivers. They forged trails over the • ORD.E Page 339 of 751 Cascade Mountains, traded with tribes living east of the mountains, and canoed down river to gather shellfish and trade with coastal tribes. In the mid-1800s, the first pioneers arrived in the White River Valley. Railroads reached the area in the 1880s and brought adventurers from the east and Midwest United States, as well as Europe and Asia. Early farmers, and many immigrants, from both Europe and Japan, tilled the rich soil and planted a variety of crops. The harvests were abundant and soon the White River Valley became one of the prime agricultural centers in the region. Auburn's central location between Seattle and Tacoma was a key factor in the rapid growth of the area. A powerhouse, built in 1911 on the upper White River, served Auburn as well as the needs of the cities of Seattle and Tacoma. This facility also served the legendary Interurban Railway. In 1910 the Northern Pacific Railroad selected the town as the site of its western freight terminal. When scores of permanent rail workers arrived and needed housing, Auburn experienced its first population boom. World War II saw the second transformation of Auburn. The most dramatic change, however, affected the local Japanese American community. When the federal government relocated the residents of Japanese ancestry to distant internment camps for the duration of the war, many families lost businesses, homes and farms. Most of these families never returned. Although Auburn remained a strong agricultural community for some time, the city became even more industrialized in the years following the War. The Boeing Company opened an aircraft plant in Auburn in the 1960s. The occasional winter and spring flooding that wreaked havoc for the early pioneers was brought under control when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers built the Mud Mountain and Howard Hanson Dams. The metamorphosis of a small frontier settlement into a well-developed industrial center is a story that continues to evolve. Significance of Auburn History for the Park Plan: Unfortunately, this rich history is not known to many residents. Recreational sites can be a key tool in introducing residents to local history. The following ideas would contribute to furthering local historical knowledge and appreciation: • Use park design, artwork, interpretive material and recreation programs to highlight past events and lifestyles to help bring history to life. • The acquisition and interpretation of historically significant sites should be explored. Olson Canyon is a desirable site for this kind of use. • The White River Valley Museum provides a valuable educational, cultural and recreational resource. The continued marketing and educational programs of the museum and their efforts to increase numbers of visitors will further enhance its value to the community. ORD.E Page 340 of 751 • Recommendations/Conclusions in Response to Our Auburn Community Data concerning our population, natural resources, and history give us valuable information about how to best serve our communities park and recreation needs. The following conclusions can be drawn from the data provided above: 1. Age/Composition: Our young, growing population, with many single-parent families and an increasing population of elderly residents, has extensive needs for recreation and service programs, as well as recreation facilities. 2. Race: Auburn's changing racial composition can be incorporated into its historical, cultural and recreational programming and in development of facilities. 3. Housing: With increased density of housing, there is an increased need for parks and open space to replace the lost "backyard" is occurring. 4. Income Levels: The lower income levels in Auburn mean that there is a greater need for public recreation facilities. Our residents also require classes and programs at reasonable rates or no cost. Teens, the elderly and families with several children are particularly in need of free or reduced fee services. 5. New Park Development: Specific park land and facilities needed to serve new residents should be determined as development occurs or is planned. The recently annexed areas of Lea Hill and West Hill are under served by parks and recreation 411 programs. Park site selection should ensure that the site will physically accommodate the identified facilities. Areas with extensive steep slopes and wetlands may be difficult areas in which to develop active recreation facilities, although they may be suited to open space or passive activities. 6. Scenic and Resource Lands: Lands with high scenic or natural resource value should be acquired and utilized for parks and open space. Public access to these locations should be guaranteed through site selection and design. 7. Ecosystems: It is desirable to have parks located in a variety of ecosystems present in the city. This means we plan parks in, or adjacent to the rivers, creeks, wetlands and wooded hillsides found throughout the city. 8. Art and History: The inclusion of historical artwork, public art, and information in the development of parks will broaden their value to the community. It can provide an added source of enjoyment and education to the recreational experience. • ORD.E Page 341 of 751 ORD.E Page 342 of 751 • Chapter 3 : Public Involvement Chapter 3 Public Involvement Parks are intended to serve the residents, workers and visitors of the city, it is vital their input be sought in the planning process. This ensures implemented facilities and programs will be used. Data gathered in the planning process can be used as a foundation for future actions, eliminating the likelihood of arbitrary decisions. This section will detail how public input was obtained, and how it influences the decision-making process. This chapter is divided into four sections: I. Recreation Needs Assessment II. Park Land Needs III. Facility Needs IV. Summary Section I, the Recreation Needs Assessment, describes the procedure used in determining what recreational opportunities our community needs. Its analysis of recreation participation rates and the preferred recreation activities of residents. Section II, Park Land Needs, analyzes the quantity of park land needed to meet the needs of the present and future population. Section III, Facility Needs, describes the type of facilities most desired by Auburn residents, and the number of facilities required to meet this demand. "Facilities" refers to physical features such as a basketball courts or sports fields. Finally, Section IV provides a Summary of Park Land Needs. Public Participation Several methods were used to assure public guidance, participation and awareness of the park planning process in the Park and Recreation Plan. They include: • On-line Survey • Public, Park Board, Planning Commission and City Council Meetings • Auburn Health Impact Assessment • City of Auburn Community Visioning Report The purpose of these activities was to determine community attitudes, use of existing facilities, and the demand for additional recreational facilities and programs. Recreation Standards ORD.E Page 344 of 751 • Recreation standards are guides that communities follow to estimate in quantifiable terms the number of acres or facilities required to meet the recreation demand in the area. By attaching the standard to a population variable, it is easy to forecast future needs as the population grows. National standards, developed by the National Recreation and Parks Association (NRPA), are very general guidelines. Auburn, like most cities, develop recreation standards specific to our community. Standards express minimum acceptable level of recreation facilities and park land. Meeting or exceeding the standards is our goal of the planning process for future park acquisition and development. I. Recreation Needs Assessment In March and April 2015 the City of Auburn Parks Department conducted an online Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Survey. The purpose of this work was to identify the demand for recreation programs and facilities in Auburn. The Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey produced by the Auburn Parks Department: 1. A survey of Auburn residents 2. Analysis of survey results compared to National Benchmarks to gain further strategic information 3. Analysis of existing park land needs and forecasting future needs by the community and Parks and Recreation department staff 4. Analysis of existing recreation facilities and forecasting of future needs, created by the Parks • and Recreation department and outcomes of Community Attitude and Interest For study purposes an estimated 2014 population of 76,347 was used as a base for current needs. The 2025 population is forecasted at approximately 84,948 and the 2030 population at 89,868. These figures are used in the study to calculate how much park land and what facilities will be needed in the future. Although this Park, Recreation & Open Space Plan Update does not look at the city's ultimate development, it is good to keep in mind the impact that population growth will have on recreational resources. Providing sufficient park land is an obvious concern for the long term, as vacant land continues to be converted to commercial, residential, and industrial uses. National Trends in Recreation Participation The National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA) encourages Parks Departments to be aware of trends facing parks and recreation. The NRPA has recently identified the following five trends that will impact the future of parks and recreation: Trend 1: Programs are key to great park attendance. The public likes programs in parks. When there are programs in parks attendance is stronger. When you don't have programs in parks it can lead to a slew of consequences— less use, less public support, reduced budgets and more. One caution —watch out for those mandates on cost recovery and the unintended social inequity that could be a result. • ORD.E Page 345 of 751 Trend 2:The perceived value of distributed services results in agency functions assigned to various departments. The recession resulted in a lot of restructuring of departments and shifting roles. One thing is for certain, when a single department carries out all the park and recreation responsibilities, operations are most effective. If your agency can position itself as a valuable essential service and optimize your services, you'll fare best. Trend 3: Agencies are pioneering new funding methods. We have to remember that the "new normal" of shrinking municipal budgets doesn't necessarily mean there is less public support or demand. Getting creative to maximize this demand and bolster your revenue can be critical. In fact, during the recession those agencies and special districts that invested in revenue-producing facilities fared better than others. Keep in mind that you'll want to retain revenues for agency operations for success. The Analysis report has a few examples. Trend 4: Infrastructure deficit means you'll have to fight harder for public dollars. The nation's infrastructure of state roads, highways, bridges, dams, sewers and more are well over-due for replacement, renovation or renewal. Funding for these projects will compete with yours. But you can address this— be at the infrastructure table to discuss park needs and how you provide innovative solutions to the infrastructure challenge. Trend 5: Walkable cities draw Millennials, fueling a suburban exodus. The Millennials are here and have moved into the center of influence with their distinct views and behaviors. Research shows they are drawn to walkable environments with cultural amenities. Not only do you have to think about how you can serve their interests and harness their influential power, but we have to consider the shifts that are happening in our urban cores. Will disadvantaged populations be pushed into the suburbs? What does that mean for the services we provide? The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Survey Results The survey specific questions were tailored to issues of strategic importance for park planning and development and national benchmarking comparisons to Auburn. The survey was developed to elicit information concerning: • Level of use of park facilities • Overall satisfaction of park facilities • Percentage of respondents households that have a need for various recreational facilities • How well existing recreational facilities in Auburn meet the needs of respondent households. • Rates of participation in specific types of activities and programs ORD.E Page 346 of 751 • • Satisfaction of current programming levels • Satisfaction of the current Parks Administration Overview of the Methodology The City of Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department conducted an online Parks, Recreation, and Open Space survey during March and April 2015 to help establish priorities for the continued development of parks and recreation facilities, programs and services within the community. Parks staff marketed the survey through social media (Facebook), newspaper articles (Auburn Reporter), and through the City's Website. We received a total of 600 respondents for the online survey. Summary of Survey Results Q1. How often do members of your household visit any of the parks, trails, or other park facilities in Auburn? Q2. Which facilities do you or members of your household use the most to participate in recreational activities? Q3. Please rate your satisfaction with the following park facilities that you have used and/or visited in the last year? SQ4. In general how would you rate the quality and quantity of the existing inventory of parks, trails, and open spaces in Auburn? Q5. Please rate the level of importance for each type of facility? Q6. How often do you or members of your household participate in a Parks, Arts or Recreation Program in Auburn? Q7. How do you rate the quality of the programs that you have participated in? Q8. How did you learn about the City of Auburn programs? Q9. Please rate your satisfaction with various Parks, Arts& Recreation Programs currently offered by the City of Auburn. Q10. Please rate your level of participation in the following programs and activities that you or members of your household participate in (does not matter where activity takes place)? Q11. What recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others)that your household members would use? S ORD.E Page 347 of 751 Q12. What recreation programs by age group should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others)that your household members would use? Q13. Please rate the importance of the following functions that Auburn Parks and Rec Department provide. 014. If it requires more money than can be budgeted from recreational resources to provide future recreation programs, how would you rate the following methods of paying for them? 015. City Council, subject to voter approval and in conformity with statutory authority, can propose a special property tax levy or bond issue as a means of financing parks, recreation and open space acquisitions, development or improvements. How much, if anything, would your household be willing to pay per year for this source of funding that could only be used for parks and recreation? Q16. Which area of the city do you live in? Q17. How close do you live to the nearest park? Q18. Where do you work? Q19. How many years have you lived in Auburn? Q20. What type of housing do you live in? Q21. What age group are you in? Q22. What is your race? (mark one or more) II. Park Land Needs The determination of park land needs begins with an inventory of existing parks. There are currently 59 park sites owned and/or operated and maintained by the City of Auburn, totaling 977.37 acres. Table 3-1 below is an inventory of existing park land, by type. The park types are a classification system used to group parks of similar size and function. Beyond the City limits there are additional park and open space sites managed by King County. These may be important considerations in the future if these areas of unincorporated King County are annexed into the City. ORD.E Page 348 of 751 • Table 3-1 Existing Park Inventory Park Type No. of Sites Acres/Miles No. Developed Acres/Miles Developed Neighborhood Park 22 67.84 Acres 21 58.74 Acres Community Parks 14 267.81 Acres 12 223.78 Acres Open Space 7 386.89 Acres 0 0 Acres Special Use Areas 16 254.77 Acres 16 254.77 Acres Trails 15* 26.39 Miles** 15* 26.39 Mlles** Totals 59 977.37 Acres 49 537.29 Acres *Not included in No.of sites **Not included totals Neighborhood Park Inventory and Needs Analysis Table 3-2 Neighborhood Parks Size:Less than 5 acres Service Area:%:mile radius Typical Features: Children's Play Structure Picnic Facilities Trails Open Space/Nature Areas Tennis Courts Outdoor Basketball Court Multi-use play fields Definition Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed primarily for non- supervised, non-organized recreation activities. Neighborhood parks are usually small in size (less than five acres) and serve an area of approximately 1/2 mile radius. Since these parks are located within walking and bicycling distance,the activities they offer become a daily pastime for neighborhood children. Typical facilities are listed in the side-bar. Existing Inventory S ORD.E Page 349 of 751 Currently there are 22 neighborhood parks category, one of which is undeveloped. Most neighborhood parks are fully developed. See Chapter 5 for a comprehensive list of neighborhood parks. Determination of the Neighborhood/Mini-Park Standard 1. Adopted standard: Auburn's has an adopted ratio of 1.32 total acres/1,000 is within this standard, which is based on the current Park Impact Fee Study. The ratio of developed neighborhood parks is 1.32 acres/1000. 2. Service area: Most residential areas of the City are served by neighborhood parks. Exceptions are the portions of West Hill, portions of Lea Hill, the central downtown area, portions of southeast Auburn, and undeveloped residential zones. 3. Present city policy: In recent years the City has developed larger sized neighborhood parks over one to two acres. Parks of more than five acres are easier to maintain and can serve a wider range of ages and interests. Current City standard for neighborhood parks is 1.32 acres per 1,000 residents. 4. User trends: Users of small neighborhood parks tend to be children. As neighborhoods grow older and children mature, these parks tend to get less use. Users of the larger neighborhood park tend to be older children and adults who visit it on a non-structured basis like hiking and jogging. These parks have open space and visual value for the neighborhood. In recent years some smaller parks have incorporated walking trails around the perimeter. Table 3-3 Recommended Neighborhood Park Standard Adopted Standard: 1.32 Acres/1,000 Existing Ratio: Total: 1.01 Acres/1,000 Developed:0.89 Acres/1,000 Undevel:0.12 Acres/1,000 Existing Inventory: 67.84 Acres Current Need: 32.94 Acres Future Need: 2025:44.29 Acres 2030:50.79 Acres Neighborhood Park ORD.E Page 350 of 751 • Conclusions/Recommendations: 1.Adopted Standard: The adopted standard for neighborhood parks is 1.32 acres per 1,000 residents. Neighborhood parks should be developed in response to new residential growth. 2. Current and Future Need: The City falls short of its adopted standard for Neighborhood Parks by 32.94 Acres. Approximately 44.29 acres of additional neighborhood park land will be needed by 2025. This number will rise to 50.79 acres by 2030. 3. Future Neighborhood Park Development: The City will need to assess current adopted standard using a community based approach to determine if additional neighborhood park space is necessary to meet demand. In some cases community parks or other facilities may take the place of neighborhood parks. 4. Park Development: The development of more mini-parks (under one or two acres) is not encouraged. Mini-parks have not been found to be as successful as larger community parks, because they tend to serve very small populations and are difficult and expensive to maintain. Developers may have the opportunity to develop neighborhood parks that are maintained by the local homeowners association but meet the park standards. • Community Park Inventory and Needs Analysis Table 3-4 Community Parks Size: 10+acres* Service Area: 1-2 mile radius Typical Features: Children's Play Structure Picnic Facilities Sport Fields Nature Trails Tennis Courts Bodies of Water Gardens Parking Restrooms *Size exceptions occur for single purpose parks serving the entire community. Definition A community park is planned primarily to provide active and structured recreation opportunities for young people and adults. They often exceed 10 acres in size and may have sports fields, water bodies, gardens, nature trails or similar features as the central focus of the ORD.E Page 351 of 751 park. Community parks can also provide indoor facilities to meet a wide range of recreation interests. They require more support facilities such as parking and restrooms than neighborhood parks. Community parks serve a much larger area than neighborhood parks and offer more facilities. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park can also serve the neighborhood park function. The community park service area covers a one to two mile radius. Existing Inventory Currently there are 12 community parks that are developed in Auburn, that comprise 223.78 total acres. Jacobsen Tree Farm and the 304 Ave SE property along the Green River are the two community park sites that are currently undeveloped. These two sites account for 44 acres of area that will be developed into Community Parks in the future. See Chapter 5 for a comprehensive list of Community Parks. Determination of the Community Park Standard 1. Adopted standards: The adopted standard for community parks is 4.5 acres per 1,000 residents. Auburn's current ratio of 2.92 acres/1,000 of developed community park area falls short of the adopted standard by 119 acres. There is currently 44 acres (0.57 acres/1000) of undeveloped community park land in the City's park land inventory. 2. Service Area: The valley floor portion of Auburn is served by community parks reasonably well. The recently annexed areas of the City (West Hill and Lea Hill), and southeast auburn need to be considered for adding park area. 3. Present city policy: In recent years the City placed emphasis on developing the larger community parks. They have more recreation choices, are cheaper to maintain on a per acre basis, serve more people and are easier to program for activities. 4. User Trends: The larger multi-service community parks are popular because they provide a wide range of activities. Community parks can often meet the recreation needs of all members of the family in one location. Table 3-5 Recommended Community Park Standard Adopted Standard: 4.5 Acres/1,000 Existing Ratio: Total: 3.50 Acres/1,000 Developed: 2.92 Acres/1,000 ORD.E Page 352 of 751 Undevel:0.57 Acres/1,000 • Existing Inventory: Developed: 223.78 Acres Undevel:44.03 acres Current Need: 119 Acres Future Need: 2025: 158.48 Acres 2030: 180.63 Acres Community Park Conclusions/Recommendations 1. Adopted Standard: Maintaining the standard of 4.5 acres of developed community park land per 1,000 population is recommended. This reflects both the relative importance Auburn residents place on this type of multi-use facility, which has remained relatively constant over the past two decades. 2. Current and Future Need: At 2.92 acres/1000 residents, the City is currently is currently falling short of adopted standards for total community park land by 119 acres. If residential development proceeds as expected, by 2025 158.58 acres additional acreage is needed, with 180.63 acres of additional area needed by 2030. 3. Future Community Park Development: • Future community park sites should be selected to west hill and lea hill, newly developing areas, and to help fill large gaps between existing parks. Other residential areas, while within the two mile radius, are toward the edge of existing service areas. These areas include the northeast and southeast corners of the City. With population growth occurring in these areas, new community park acquisition and development is necessary. Trails Inventory and Needs Assessment Table 3-6 Trails/Linear Parks Size:Wide Variation Service Area: Local to Regional Typical Features: Trails Trail heads Nature Trails Picnic Facilities Interpretive Signage Benches River Access • ORD.E Page 353 of 751 Definition Trails/Linear parks usually follow elongated features such as stream corridors, abandoned railroads, or power line easements. These parks may be used for trail systems, interpretive areas, open space or landscaped areas. Trail/Linear parks often contain limited development; trail heads, trail systems, educational signage and benches or picnic tables may be all that occur. However, in cases such as a wide power line easement, more extensive development is possible. Existing Inventory In Auburn, the Interurban Trail, the Reddington Levee (Green River) Trail, and the White River Trail fall into the trail park category. The Interurban Trail is a 4.5 mile path along the Puget Sound Energy right-of-way. The trail travels from north to south through the city and is part of a larger regional system that runs from Tukwila to Pacific. Development consists of a paved trail used for walking, running, biking and skating. The White River Trail (WRT) extends through Roegner Park and Game Farm Wilderness Park where the entire length of the trail runs along the river. The length of the WRT is included in this category, but the acreage for Roegner Park and Game Farm Wilderness Park are included in the area calculations for Community and Special Use areas, respectively. In addition to a paved trail, the WRT has a soft surface trail that is suitable for equestrians or hikers for part of its length. Table 3-7 Adopted Trail Standard Adopted Standard: 0.19 mile/1,000 Existing Ratio: Total:0.34 mile/1,000 Existing Inventory: 26.39 Miles Current Need: 0.0 Miles Future Need: 2025:0 Miles* 2030:0 Miles * *Additional miles will be added based on residential development and the transportation plan. Determination of the Standard 1. Comparison to other standards: Auburn's adopted ratio of 0.19 total miles/1,000 developed trail park land is near the top when compared to other cities. 2. Service area: ORD.E Page 354 of 751 Depending on the facilities, trails may serve a local neighborhood, or in the case of the Interurban Trail, serve the entire community and beyond. There are additional opportunities in Auburn to develop this type of park area. 3. User Trends: Based on the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey, walking and other trail related activities continue to be the most popular form of recreational activity in Auburn. The vision to build regional trail systems connecting communities presents some challenges but is still attainable in southern King County. Trails/Linear Parks Conclusions/Recommendations: 1. Recommended Standard: Because unique opportunities exist, and interest in trails is high, the standard for trails is recommended to stay at the current ratio of 0.19 miles developed trail park land/1000 residents. Even with the current inventory of trails exceeding adopted standards, further expansion and development of trails is imperative to connect the different areas of the City and beyond. The need for an interconnected trail system is expected to increase as residents show an overwhelming interest in using trails to recreate, and when considering alternative means of commuting to and from work. 2. Future Trails/Linear Park Development: There are several opportunities to develop additional trails and linear parks in Auburn providing local and regional trail systems. Considering the interest in trail activities as demonstrated by the survey and national recreation trends, these additional trails are worth pursuing. Identified locations for potential loop trails within parks, new linear parks, or extensions of existing linear parks include: • BPA Power Line Easement (Lea Hill to Green River Road) • Green River • White River Trail (A Street to Interurban Trail) • Mill Creek Corridor • Rotary Park • Shaughnessy Park • Fulmer Park Special Use Area Inventory and Needs Assessment Table 3-8 Special Use Areas Size:Variable Service Area: Not applicable Typical Features: 4110 ORD.E Page 355 of 751 Landscaped Areas Community Gardens Viewpoints Historic Sites Traffic Islands Specific Park or Recreation Areas Table 3-9 Adopted Special Use Area Standard Recommended Standard: None Existing Inventory: 254.77 Acres Current Need: 0.0 Acres Future Need: 2025:0 Acres 2030:0 Acres ** **Based on availability Definition Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or land occupied by a specialized facility. Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small landscaped areas, community gardens, streetscapes, developed portions of the Environmental Park, viewpoints, historic sites and other specialized areas. Existing Inventory The farmstead portion of Mary Olson Farm, and the bird tower and boardwalk area of the Environmental Park have been added to this category since the last Park Plan update. Other special use areas in Auburn include unique sites such as the Auburn Golf Course, Fenster Nature Park, Mountainview Cemetery, and Pioneer Cemetery. These areas in the City total 254.77 acres. In addition to the areas mentioned above and not included in the overall acreage of our park inventory,the Parks and Recreation Department maintains trees and landscaping at more than 30 beautification areas throughout the City. Most of these beautification areas provide valuable green space along streets, but are not intended for recreation purposes. The horticultural maintenance crew also tends to all of the hanging baskets and planters downtown and at several sites throughout Auburn. Special Use Areas Conclusions/Recommendations 1. No Standard Recommended: ORD.E Page 356 of 751 • No standard for development of special use areas is recommended. It is expected that additional acreage will continue to be acquired as development occurs, and as small areas unusable for other purposes become part of the public right-of way. 2. Aesthetic Improvements: Survey comments reveal that residents have a strong interest in the aesthetic improvement of the City through additional plantings of street trees, flowers and other plantings. These special use and beautification areas are good opportunities for incorporating aesthetic improvements into the community. 3. Design Guidelines: The Parks and Recreation Department has a goal to develop design guidelines for special use areas. These should address the different types of special use areas and their particular design and maintenance requirements. Low maintenance plantings are recommended. 4. Public Green Spaces: Opportunities for incorporating additional green space into public settings should be explored. The following activities should be undertaken to achieve this goal: • Work with the Traffic Engineering Department to ensure parking strip and landscaping standards are sufficient to meet the cultural needs of street trees and other landscaping. • • Encourage development of boulevard style streets in significant locations. • Develop a street tree program. Inventory trees and plants in existing public rights-of- way, and prepare a long-term care and replacement plan. Maintain Tree City USA designation. S. Historic Properties: Identification of historic sites and buildings, and potential methods for their preservation should be undertaken through development of a Historic Preservation Plan. Both existing and potential park sites should be examined for their ability to contain or interpret historic sites, buildings, and events. See Chapter 6 for more on historic preservation. Continue to work with King County Cultural Resources Division to identify sites and funding opportunities for historic properties. TOTAL PARK LAND NEEDS ASSESSMENT Definition and Inventory: Auburn's total park land inventory equals 977.37 acres. This complete inventory includes all the park types discussed earlier in this chapter: Neighborhood Parks, Community Parks, Linear Parks, Open Space, and Special Use Areas. The ratio of total park area for all park, including all park areas is 12.8 acres/1,000 residents. • ORD.E Page 357 of 751 For the purposes of assessing the amount of park land needed for the future, our plan focuses on the Neighborhood, Community and Linear Trail Parks. These will be referred to as the "Core Parks" in Auburn's park system. The total developed park area, including community and neighborhood parks encompasses 282.52 acres. The overall area, including undeveloped community and neighborhood park areas encompasses 335.65 acres. It is still desirable to continue adding space to the Open Space and Special Use Areas, but these lands are often acquired incidentally, and will not be pursued through developer impact fees. Basis for the Standard: Auburn's Total Park Land Standard is based on the core parks. In most cases existing parks are well-developed and can be considered complete. Several parks, however, contain open areas that can absorb additional recreational facilities or development. These parks were analyzed to determine the amount of fully developed acreage they contain. This "developed" park area is used in determining the recommended standard. Table 3-12 lists the existing ratios for parks, showing these for both the total acres for each park type, then the existing ratios for just the developed acreage. In fairness toward those who may pay impact fees in the future, the Recommended Standard is based on the ratio for only developed park areas for the Core Parks. This plan assumes that future park land will be fully developed in order to meet the recommended standard. Determination of the Standard: The current standards are based on The Park Impact Fee Study prepared by the FCS Group, dated. The current Auburn Municipal Code (AMC), Chapter 19.08 codifies the impact fees and requires impact fees to be paid at the time of issuance of a Building Permit. The adopted , which includes Linear Parks, is 6.03 acres per 1,000. The standard of 6.03 acres per 1,000 applies to all new residential developments, which is in place to mitigate impacts on the community by paying impact fees. Pursuant to ACC 17.14.100, it is the policy of the city to require park land dedication where a proposed subdivision will result in a substantial increase in demand for park land or is needed to prevent or abate public nuisances. Generally, this will occur where a subdivision will result in the creation of lots capable of supporting 50 or more residential dwelling units; however, where it is determined that the proposed subdivision, together with any reasonably anticipated future development on adjacent or nearby land, will act in a cumulative manner to substantially increase demand for park land, dedication may be required of smaller subdivisions. Currently fee in lieu of land dedication is available, but is not required by code. Several large scale developments have opted for fee in lieu of land dedication in the recent past, with the fees being based on land values as they relate to the 6.03 acres/1,000 residents. Based on the premise that larger community parks and multi-use facilities are more desirable from a demand and needs standpoint, the City needs to consider updating the current code to include a fee in lieu of land dedication program for developments that include 50 lots or more. ORD.E Page 358 of 751 This will allow for allocating funds to develop and improve larger park properties in order to meet the demands of a growing population. A new Park Impact Fee Study is for Planned 2016, and will update the level of service standards based on the demand and needs analysis in this plan. A system that takes into account the ratio of land per 1,000 residents, an overall system dollar value per capita, and proximity of facilities to the population (service area) is recommended. Many cities are doing this in lieu of exclusively relying on land to residents per 1,000 ratios because needs and improvements are better assessed through this community based approach. Total Park Land Conclusions/Recommendations: 1. Recommended Standard: The adopted standard of 6.03 acres per 1,000 population will ensure that Auburn residents will continue to have access to the same level of Community, Neighborhood and Linear Park land as the community continues to grow. As previously discussed this standard will be updated through a Park Impact Fee study. No standard is established for Open Space Areas or Special Use Areas, although the City will continue to pursue acquisition of these types of park land as opportunities arise. These areas may be looked at more closely when updating the Park Impact Fee Study, while taking into account park land demands and needs presented in this plan. • 2. Park Use by Non-Residents: Park Department records show county residents participate frequently in Auburn recreation programs. It can be assumed they also visit the City's parks with equal frequency. Non-resident use does not show up in the survey data, since only City residents participated in the survey. In addition to county residents, people who work here and visit from other areas also benefit from the parks and recreation system. This group is known as equivalent population and should be taken into account when determining demands and needs, and level of service standards provided by the City's Park system. The fee to participate in Auburn's programs and classes is discounted to Auburn residents, while non-residents pay full price. This fee system does not compensate the City for the actual cost of providing these services or facilities. The City also receives some funding from sources outside the City, including King County. 3. Potential Annexation Areas Over the course of the past decade or more, significant areas in the west hill and lea hill portions of the City have been annexed. There are several smaller scale areas planned for annexation, but should not affect demands and needs over the service area that the City currently encompasses. This will make it easier to plan for expanding the parks inventory to meet the demands and needs of future populations. S ORD.E Page 359 of 751 Ill. Facility Needs Establishing needs for specialized facilities such as sport fields, trail systems, swimming pools, and gymnasium space was determined by using several analytical approaches. These included: • Present recreation participation levels and needs as expressed in the survey ( City of Auburn Parks Department March 2015) • NRPA trends • Input from staff concerning user groups • Number and type of sport teams • Play requirements • Mathematical models Information derived from the survey and input from user groups via City staff was taken into account when goals were developed for specific types of recreation facilities. Also considered were existing school district, County and private facilities located within the City of Auburn. These other facilities satisfy a certain need, but they do not completely make up for the shortfall of public need. The following pages provide a short description and analysis of each major type of recreational facility. These include: • Baseball Fields • Softball and Youth Baseball Fields • Football Fields • Soccer Fields • Tennis Courts • Gymnasium Space • Community Center • Swimming Pools • Recreation Trails Baseball Fields Table 3-10 Adopted Baseball Field Goal: Adopted Goal: 1 Field/6,000 residents Existing Ratio: 1 Field/5873 residents Existing Inventory: 13 Fields Unmet Need: ORD.E Page 360 of 751 • 0 Fields Existing Baseball Field Inventory: City Fields Brannan Park 2 Field, Lighted Game Farm Park 1 Field, Lighted School Fields Auburn High 1 Field; Lighted Auburn Riverside High School 1 Field; Lighted Auburn Mountainview High School 2 Field; 1 Lighted Cascade Middle School 1 Field Mt. Baker Middle School 3 Fields Olympic Middle School 1 Field Rainier Middle School 1 Field Total 13 Analysis: Baseball fields in Auburn parks are suitable for adults and youth ages 13 and over. At present most baseball teams are for are the primary users of baseball fields in the City. The City, Auburn • Little League and select baseball leagues administer Youth baseball programs. Determination of the Goal: 1. Survey: The survey indicated that youth baseball ranked #16 in participation and adult baseball ranked 38 in Auburn. 2. User Trends: Youth baseball participation has decreased in the past two decades. 3. Field Demand: Demand for baseball fields is currently created by 8 teams. These include: 2 City Sponsored Youth Baseball Teams, age 13+ 0 Auburn Little League, age 13+ 4 Select teams 8 Total Teams Conclusions/Recommendations: The current number of fields are currently adequate, but will need to be reassessed during the next Park Plan update in order to determine if needs are met in the future. A priority system 411 ORD.E Page 361 of 751 has also been established that ensures that Auburn residents have the highest priority for field use. Softball and Youth Baseball Fields Table 3-11 Recommended Softball and Youth Baseball Field Goal: Adopted Goal: 1 Field/2,200 residents Existing Ratio: 1 Field/3,319 residents Existing Inventory: 23 Fields Unmet Need: 11 Fields Existing Softball/Youth Baseball Field Inventory: City Fields Brannan Park 1 Fields (1 Lighted) Fulmer Field 2 Fields (2 Lighted) Game Farm Park 3 Fields (2 Lighted) GSA Park 2 Fields (2 Lighted) Les Gove Park 1 Fields Scootie Brown Park 1 Field Sunset Park 2 Fields School Fields West Auburn High 1 Field Auburn Riverside High School 2 Fields (1 Lighted) Auburn Mountainview High 2 Fields Mt. Baker Middle School 2 Fields Olympic Middle School 1 Field Rainier Middle School 1 Field Community Fields YMCA 2 Field Total 23 Analysis: ORD.E Page 362 of 751 • The demand for softball and youth baseball fields has declined but remains strong, with over 161 teams currently using City fields. In Auburn, the City manages adult softball, youth softball, youth baseball and T-Ball programs. In addition, school teams, local Little League, and select fast pitch teams use City fields. In Auburn, adult and youth softball, youth baseball and sometimes even soccer are played on the same fields. When these leagues play at the same time it makes scheduling very difficult and requires more field space. Determination of the Goal: 1. Survey: The survey shows that youth baseball was ranked #16, youth softball was ranked #26, and adult softball was ranked #32 in participation. 2. User Trends: Interest in youth baseball has decreased in the past two decades; interest in softball has remained nearly constant. 3. Field Demand: Demand for softball and youth baseball fields is created by the following number of teams: 80 City Adult Slow Pitch 9 City Youth Baseball (grades 3-6) 7 City Youth Fastpitch 18 City T-Ball/Cub Clinic 40 Little League • 161 Total Teams The City is able to provide enough fields only by restricting practice time once the season begins. Teams practice before the season, on weekends or use elementary school facilities. Demand for practice time exceeds the availability at school fields. The heavy demand for organized play and practice allows little opportunity for informal play at most of these fields. Conclusions/Recommendations: To meet the adopted standard of 1 field/2200 residents the City will need to consider developing or gaining access to 11 additional fields. The current number of fields does not meet current or future needs, but with participation rates declining this number is likely not as bad as it looks. Football Fields Existing Football Field Inventory: Table 3-12 Adopted Football Field Goal: Recommended Goal: 1 Field/4,000 residents S ORD.E Page 363 of 751 Existing Ratio: 1 Field/6,940 residents Existing Inventory: 11 Fields Unmet Need: 8 Fields City Fields Game Farm 4 Seasonal Field (1 Lighted) School Fields Auburn High School 1 Field, Lighted, Synthetic Auburn Riverside High 1 Field, Lighted, Synthetic Auburn Mountainview High 1 Field, Lighted Synthetic Cascade Middle School 1 Field Olympic Middle School 1 Field Mt. Baker Middle School 1 Field Rainier Middle School 1 Field Analysis: Eleven football fields currently serve several football programs. The City-sponsored adult flag football program has 41 teams that play on four seasonal fields at Game Farm. The Auburn Junior Football Auburn Ravens Leagues are privately sponsored and have four age divisions which play tackle football, with a total of 9 teams between them. Each of privately sponsored youth football leagues have cheer programs, which share the spaces being used for football. The Parks Department sponsors a youth flag football league which has seven teams. As the existing inventory list shows, seven fields are on school property, so these fields are not available during school events. Determination of the Goal: 1. Survey: Although survey rankings for football were not very high, this sport remains very popular for certain age groups and individuals. Football ranked #25 in participation rates. 2. User Trends The number of football teams playing in Auburn has remained constant for the past few years. 3. Demand: 41 City Adult Flag Football 9 Auburn Junior Football League (4 age divisions) 7 City Youth Flag Football 57 Total Teams Conclusions/Recommendations: The current need for these fields is for games and practice time. The existing ratio reflects a deficiency in football fields. With deficiencies in football and ORD.E Page 364 of 751 • soccer fields, the City needs to consider adding to the inventory of fields used for football and soccer. Soccer Fields Table 3-13 Recommended Soccer Field Goal: Recommended Goal: 1 Field/2,000 residents Existing Ratio: 1 Field/7,634 residents Existing Inventory: 36 Fields Unmet Need: 2 Existing Soccer Field Inventory: City Fields Brannan Park 1 Field, Unlighted Brannan Park 7 Modified • Game Farm Park Game Farm Park 2 Fields, Lighted 7 Modified School Fields Auburn High 1 Field, Lighted Auburn Riverside High 1 Field, Lighted Auburn Mountain View High 1 Field, Lighted West Auburn High 1 Field, Unlighted Community Fields YMCA 2 Fields, Unlighted YMCA 13 Modified Total 36* *Includes a combination of full sized and modified fields Analysis: The total number of soccer fields includes 10 full sized soccer fields and 27 mini or modified fields that are set up between Game Farm Park, Brannan Park, and the YMCA. Depending on the size of the modified fields they can be used for youth or adult play. With the popularity of • ORD.E Page 365 of 751 soccer trending upwards, the City needs to consider how to increase the number of accessible soccer fields in order to meet current and future demands. The City has one existing Kompan mini soccer field at Lea Hill Park, with one planned and funded through a King County Youth Sports Facility Grant at Brannan Park. These are small arena style sports courts with synthetic surfacing, and are extremely popular for open play. There is no programming planned for these facilities. Determination of the Goal: 1. Survey: According to the survey, youth soccer was #12 in participation, while adult soccer ranked #34. However, interest in. 2. User Trends: Soccer has shown a steady increase in popularity nationally, and a dramatic increase in the Northwest in the last 10 years. 3. Demand: Currently, demand for soccer field use is created by the following number of teams: 66 City Youth Soccer 70 Auburn Youth Soccer Association 6 Adult Soccer Teams 142 Total Teams Conclusions/Recommendations: Analysis of the figures indicates a need for 28 additional fields at this time. Tennis Courts Table 3-14 Adopted Tennis Courts Goal: Recommended Goal: 1 Court/2,500 residents Existing Ratio: 1 Court/2633 residents Existing Inventory: 29 Tennis Courts Unmet Need: 1 Courts Existing Tennis Court Inventory City Courts Game Farm Park 4 Courts, Lighted Lea Hill Tennis Courts 1 Court ORD.E Page 366 of 751 • School Courts Auburn High School 8 Courts, Lighted Auburn Riverside High 8 Courts, Lighted Auburn Mountainview High 8 Courts, Lighted Total 29 Analysis: There are 29 tennis courts in Auburn located at school sites and city parks. There are no public or private indoor tennis facilities in the Auburn area. Determination of the Goal: 1. Comparison to Other Standards: Auburn has a higher ratio than most other representative communities. This is accounted for in part because school facilities are used in calculating the ratio. 2. Survey: Survey results show that tennis was ranked #30 in participation. 3. User Trends: Although interest in tennis on a national scale has remained about the same for the past twenty years, Auburn's participation remains relatively low. • Conclusions/Recommendations: Because of Auburn's relatively low interest and participation rates, the current number of tennis courts is sufficient. No additional courts are needed at this time. Gymnasium Space Existing Gymnasium Inventory: Table 3-15 Adopted Gymnasium Goal: Recommended Goal: 1 Gym/5,000 residents Existing Ratio: 1 Gym/15,269 residents Existing Inventory: 5 Gyms * Unmet Need: 10 Gyms * Based on 15%usage of 27 Public School Gymnasiums. ORD.E Page 367 of 751 City Facilities Les Gove 1 Gym Auburn Schools Alpac Elementary 1 Youth Gym Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 1 Youth Gym Chinook Elementary 1 Youth Gym Dick Scobee Elementary 1 Youth Gym Evergreen Hts. Elementary 1 Youth Gym Hazelwood Elementary 1 Youth Gym Gildo Rey Elementary 1 Youth Gym Ilalko Elementary 1 Youth Gym Lakeland Hills Elementary 1 Youth Gym Lakeview Elementary 1 Youth Gym Lea Hill Elementary 1 Youth Gym Pioneer Elementary 1 Youth Gym Terminal Park Elementary 1 Youth Gym Washington Elementary 1 Youth Gym Cascade Middle School 1 Adult Gym Mt. Baker Middle School 1 Adult Gyms Olympic Middle School 1 Adult Gym Rainier Middle School 1 Youth Gym Auburn High School 2 Adult Gyms Auburn Mountainview High 2 Adult Gyms Auburn Riverside High School 2 Adult Gyms West Auburn High 1 Adult Gym Green River College 1 Adult Gym Community and Private Gyms Grace Community Church 1 Adult Gym Total 29 Gyms Analysis: The City of Auburn offers volleyball, basketball, fitness, karate, judo, indoor soccer, indoor playground, and gymnastics programs that utilize gymnasiums. Because the City has only one gymnasium of its own, it borrows space from the Auburn School District. The primary limiting factor in gym space is when school and park programs overlap. During the school year access to the school gyms is unpredictable and they are usually not available until after 7 p.m. In addition, several groups, such as the YMCA, scouts, churches and the City, compete for use of school and City facilities, which makes scheduling more difficult. Based on the information above, school district facilities are available only 15% of the time. This figure is used in calculating the existing ratio and recommended standard. Analysis reveals the ORD.E Page 368 of 751 use of school gymnasiums provides just enough space for the volleyball and basketball • programs. Cancellations of games are frequent, due to school programming. Free court time or court use for other programs is limited. Since the construction of the City's Gymnasium at Les Gove Community Center, day use by indoor playground users and senior groups has been extremely popular. Determination of Standard: Since many different activities use gymnasiums, this standard affects many sports. 1. Survey: The Survey indicates that access to gymnasiums for a broad range of sports and activities is important to residents. Participation rates of City programming was also taken into consideration for the demands and needs of Gymnasium facilities. The seasons with the greatest demand occur from September through May. During this season basketball and volleyball programs sponsored by the City, YMCA and the School District take place simultaneously. At peak season the following number of teams play: 41 City Adult Basketball 8 City Youth Basketball 36 Community Based Youth Basketball 8 City Youth Volleyball 16 Auburn Youth Basketball • 109 Total Teams Additional Demand: A substantial number of other dance and fitness classes per week would be offered if additional gymnasium space was available. Conclusions/Recommendations: Both the number of gymnasiums and the hours that are available point to a strong need for additional gym space. For maximum scheduling availability and operating efficiency, it would be beneficial to have additional facilities constructed, owned and operated by the City. The new Community and Teen Center is expected to absorb some of the current needs of gymnasium space areas available for fitness classes and other activities that do not require full sized gymnasiums. The City-owned gymnasium has added much needed daytime hours to the program schedule and enabled the City to serve populations such as young children and seniors. Once completed, the community center (which will include indoor fitness areas) will be a valuable resource for Auburn residents choosing from a list of proposed recreational facilities. Ultimately the City needs to reassess the adopted standard. There is no question that the current number of gymnasiums is deficient, but it is not realistic to construct or expect to gain access to 10 additional gymnasiums. ORD.E Page 369 of 751 Swimming Pools Table 3-16 Recommended Swimming Pool Goal: Recommended Goal: 159 sq. ft./1,000 residents Existing Ratio: 155 Sq.Ft./1,000 residents Existing Inventory: 7,000 Sq. Ft. YMCA 4,859 Sq. Ft. ASD Pool Unmet Need: None Existing Swimming Pool Inventory: Auburn School District 1 Indoor Pool YMCA 2 Indoor Pool (Natatorium) Analysis: Auburn has a higher ratio of pool water than most cities analyzed. Swimming was ranked #9 in participation. Determination of the Goal: 1. Comparison to Other Cities: Auburn has a higher ratio of pool water than most cities analyzed. 2. Survey: Swimming was in the top ranked #9 in participation. 3. User Trends: Swimming is usually one of the top recreation activities in a Community. 4. Demand: Community needs for aquatic facilities are currently being met through a combination of School District and YMCA facilities. Conclusions/Recommendations: Based on the demand above, there is an excess of pool space currently available. The recommended goal shows no additional indoor pool area is presently needed. The addition of the new Auburn YMCA pools will cover the need of the community by way of park department use of the facility on a regular basis. ORD.E Page 370 of 751 • IV. Summary of Park and Facility Need Table 3-23 below summarizes the information described and analyzed in the previous pages. The table includes: • Adopted standards • Inventory of existing park land • Inventory of specialized recreation facilities • Amount of land and facilities that will be required to meet needs in 2025 and 2030 Table 3-17 Summary of Park and Facility Needs Park Types Adopted Existing Existing Current Future Future Standard Inventory Inventory Unmet Need:2025 Need:2030 (In developed (Total (Dev'd Need (Est. Pop (Est. Pop acres/1,000 res.) Acres) acres) 84,948) 89,868) Neighborhood Parks 1.32 67.84 58.74 32.94 44.29 50.97 Community Parks 4.5 267.81 223.75 119 158.48 180.63 Open Space Areas As acquired 386.89 N/A N/A N/A N/A Trails 0.21 26.39 N/A N/A N/A N/A Miles Subtotals 6.03 6.03 Special Use Areas As identified 254.77 II Total Park Land 6.03 Acres/1,000 977.37 537.29 151.94 202.77 231.6 residents Recreational Adopted Existing Existing Unmet Future Future Facilities Standards Inventory Inventory Need Need Need (Dev'd) (2025) (2030) Baseball Fields 1 Field/6,000 13 N/A 0 1 2 Youth Fastpitch and 1 Field/2,200 23 N/A 11 16 18 baseball fields Football Fields 1 Field/4,000 11 N/A 8 10 11 Soccer Fields 1 Field/2,000 36 N/A 2 6 9 Tennis Courts 1 Field/2,500 29 N/A 1 5 7 Gymnasiums 1 Gym/5,000 5 N/A 10 12 13 SwimmingPools 159sf/1,000 155 N/A 0 1,674 sf 2,456 sf PUBLIC ART INVENTORY Existing Major Public Art Projects Year Artist Piece Location 1989 Tom Teitge City Centennial Mural E Main& B St. NE • ORD.E Page 371 of 751 1989 Meg Pettibone Steelhead Isaac Evans Park 1991 Richard Beyer Children Playing Train at the Switch City Hall 1992 Brad Rude The Long Look Centennial Viewpoint 1993 Michele Van Slyke Every Year the Salmon Return Roegner Park 1994 Nancy Hammer Burlington Northern Railroad Bridge Auburn Way S & Hwy 18 1995 Garth Edwards B Street Plaza E Main & B St. SE 1996 Timothy Siciliano Bus Shelter Muria 15th St SW 1996 Gerald Tsutukawa Sun Circle Game Farm Park 1997 Timothy Siciliano The Equine Amusement 15th St. NE @ Metro P&R 1998 Deborah Merksy Pioneer Cemetery Entryway Auburn Way N &8th St. NE 1999 Kulzer& Spitzer Xtreme AtmosFearic Oscillator Auburn Skate Park 2000 Evans& Mee Mnemosyne's Opus King County Library 2000 Ries Niemi Sundial Les Gove Park 2001 Phillip Levine Threshold Les Gove Park 2001 Ries Niemi 5 Moments Senior Center Les Gove Park 2003 Paul Sorey Running Figures Sound Transit Plaza 2004 Brandon Zebold Sighting LL Hills Way& Evergreen Way 2004 Sidney Genette Blue Neutron Auburn Justice Center 2005 Ingrid Lahti Les Gove Community Campus Sign Auburn Way S& F Street 2006 Darel Grothaus Evergreen-Washelli Cemetery: Seattle, WA Cemetery Admin Building 2007 Greg Boudreau Veteran's Day Parade Veteran's Memorial Building 2008 Tom Askman Le Anne Lake Tobu Bo West Main Street 2008 Jesse Brown Urban Art Works Mural 233 W. Main Street (Al Collision Building) 2009 Susan Zoccola Swing and Flight Auburn Golf Course 2010 Rachael Dotson Auburn Ave Theater Mural 10 Auburn Ave 2011 Bruce Meyers Auburn Valley Topography Les Gove Park 2011 Sheila Klein Civic Lanterns 25 W. Main, City Hall 2011 Rachael Dotson Utility Boxes Varous—Throughout Downtown 2011 Mauricia Robalino Ride the Wave 116 A Street 2012 Chris Sharp Railroads our Beginning Mural 364 W Main Street 1013 Michael Laughlin Strawberry Calf Lea Hill Park 2013 Lin McJunkin Riparian Totem Auburn Justice Center 2013 Patricia Vader Watch My Tail 4910 A Street SE 2014 Kenneth Hall Origami#2 — Fuchia Sunset Park 2015 Greg Bartol Silverware Ostrich A St NW and 1''St. NE 2016 Virginia Paquette Confluence/Community 9910 Ninth Street SE ORD.E Page 372 of 751 • 13 LANK • PA G E • ORD.E Page 373 of 751 Chapter 4 : Goals and Policy • Chapter 4 Goals and Objectives The Mission Statement of the Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department is to "Protect the City of Auburn's natural beauty through a vibrant system of parks, open space, and trails while enhancing the quality of life for our citizens by providing outstanding recreational ad cultural opportunities." These goals and objectives outlined in this chapter were developed from the following resources: • 2005 Park, Arts and Recreation Open Space Plan • 2015 Parks, Recreation and Open Space Survey • Park and Recreation Board meetings • Analysis of recreation trends • Participation rates and interests • Evaluation of existing park conditions. • City of Auburn Health Impact Assessment 1. Serve all citizens — Provide a broad range of programs and facilities in order to serve all citizens regardless of age or ability. The Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department strives to provide leisure/recreational programs and facilities which are open and accessible to all citizens in the community. We are aware of the special needs of some segments of our population, and continue to provide and improve upon facilities and programs designed to accommodate these special needs. A continuing issue for any recreational program or park system is to ensure that people are aware that programs are available. With the evolution of social media over the last decade, the City has had to adapt its marketing strategies to include both innovative and traditional ways to engage the citizens of Auburn. Objectives • Provide a variety of recreation facilities and programs that will improve the physical and mental wellbeing of community members. • Provide a system of neighborhood and community parks so that residents live within a half mile walking distance to a developed park. • Develop multi-use facilities to increase flexibility to meet recreational trends as demonstrated by community input. • Continue to identify underserved segments of the population and develop programs that will satisfy unmet needs. • ORD.E Page 375 of 751 • Develop marketing strategies allowing the widest possible distribution of information concerning park facilities and recreation programs. • Provide programs and facilities designed for maximum affordability to local residents. • Continue to improve upon and expand the Fee Waiver and Scholarship Programs, where possible, to allow more low income youth and seniors to participate at reduced rates. • Continue to improve access for the disabled and seniors by providing wheelchair ramps and other appropriate facilities in parks where they do not currently exist. • Continue to maintain an open decision-making process that allows opportunity for citizen input. • Parks and Recreation Department staffing levels shall be sufficient to maintain and improve the existing cultural and recreation programs. As programs expand or additional parks are developed, the impact on current staff levels and the need for additional staff will be evaluated. 2. Healthy Balanced Activities - Provide a balanced mix of passive and active recreation opportunities. Active recreation - Predominately muscle-powered activities such as jogging, cycling, field and court sports, etc.; they commonly depend on developed sites. Passive recreation - Activities that require very little use of muscle power, such as nature viewing, photography, or picnicking. Historically Auburn Parks and Recreation Department emphasis was on sports and active recreation. While the Department and park facilities are still more oriented toward active recreation, recent development has included walking trails and appealing natural environments more conducive to a quieter experience in our parks. Objectives • Develop a park system that provides facilities for social, cultural and physical activities. • Provide parks areas that accommodate passive recreation opportunities such as picnicking and walking. • Provide park areas that accommodate active recreation such as ball fields, skate parks, spray parks, sports courts, etc. • Track changing trends at the local, state, and national levels. Respond with appropriate programs and facilities to meet changing needs as funding and budgets are available and meet the level of service expectations of the citizens of Auburn. • Provide access to healthy foods through the continued operation of the Auburn Farmer's Market and Community Gardens. 3. High Quality Parks - Provide a system of high quality parks that are well maintained and aesthetically pleasing. ORD.E Page 376 of 751 • Parks are one of the most visible public features in a City, their design and maintenance can influence people's perceptions of the community. Long term maintenance, good design, and the use of high quality materials will all affect the appearance of a park for years to come. Objectives • Develop Level of Service Standards to assure that citizen expectations are met. • Parks shall be intentionally designed to require low maintenance, and low water and energy consumption. Higher maintenance features like fountains or annual beds are reserved for high visibility locations or as appropriate. • Select environmentally friendly materials that are durable and aesthetically pleasing. • Parks shall exhibit a "cared for" appearance through close attention to maintenance. • In order to maintain parks in a safe and attractive condition, maintenance staff levels will be evaluated with additions of new park land or facilities. • Renovate deteriorating features. Identify conditions that require redesign or construction of new facilities; schedule and budget necessary changes in the City's Capital Facilities Plan. • Conduct regularly scheduled inspections to identify necessary repairs and upgrades to ensure safe conditions. 5. Positive Image through Parks - Provide a park system that contributes to a positive > city image for Auburn. Auburn's Comprehensive Plan contains a goals and objectives to enhance the City's identity by ensuring a quality visual environment. Parks are an effective tool in improving visual appearance, but many of Auburn's parks are tucked away in residential neighborhoods, unseen and unknown except to residents. This lack of visibility hinders the parks from effectively contributing to the city's overall appearance. Increased visibility and high quality design are paramount to "advertising" our community as a good place in which to live and work. Aesthetic and environmental improvements can also play an important role in community appearance. Maintenance and retention of existing trees and landscaped areas in our developed park areas, as well as planting new trees will improve the feel in our parks and public spaces. In addition to our trees and landscaped areas, public art plays a vital role in improving aesthetics around the City. Created in 1988 by the City of Auburn Arts Commission, the Art in Public Places Program is the thread that connects art, people, and place throughout Auburn. City staff and a group of consultants are currently going through a revitalization process for the downtown core area, which has the potential to create a particularly strong image of Auburn. This is an area seen and visited by most residents and many visitors. The high visibility of downtown, and the need to strengthen and renew the downtown core, make it an especially desirable location for "green spaces" in the areas encompassed by Plaza Park and City Hall S ORD.E Page 377 of 751 Plaza. The following objectives are intended to improve the image of Auburn through sensitive park design: Objectives • Select new park sites that enjoy high visibility. This may be accomplished by locating at least one side of larger parks along arterial streets. • Increase the quantity of trees, shrubs and ground covers in parks. • Continue to work on Tree City USA goals for better Urban Forestry design and tree preservation. • Create a green spaces in the downtown core that will be a focal point for community activities and stimulate economic growth. • Incorporate artwork as part of new park development or when upgrading existing parks or other public facilities. 6. Open Space and Natural Areas - Acquire and manage important open spaces in the City of Auburn. Undeveloped open spaces contribute to the well-being of our community in many ways. We value them for their ability to provide buffers from urban encroachment; to provide opportunities for recreation; to provide public access to creeks, rivers and other water bodies; to create distinctive settings within the city; to provide connections between different areas for both people and wildlife; as well as offering health and safety benefits. Objectives • Maintain and protect a system of forested corridors and buffers to provide separation between natural areas and urban last uses. • Target significant open space areas in the City, with emphasis on their planning and acquisition. Target areas include the land along the Green and White Rivers, steep hillsides, Mill Creek Corridor and West Hill Watershed. • Explore all possible funding mechanisms to enable the acquisition of open space on a regular basis to identify properties as they become available. • City owned open space lands shall be accessible to the public wherever possible and appropriate. • Provide adequate management and maintenance of public open spaces, ensuring their ability to provide environmental benefits and wildlife habitat. • When mitigation is required, develop a monitoring and maintenance plan to ensure successful establishment. • Involve the community in habitat restoration activities through the City's annual Clean Sweep event, community service days, and an adopt a park program. 7. Trails— Provide a network of pedestrian and bicycle trails. ORD.E Page 378 of 751 The needs of all citizens must be considered when developing a comprehensive multi-use trail • system. Being able to move throughout the city and region without a car is becoming more and more important as we are increasingly aware of environmental pollution and traffic congestion. The following objectives are offered as ways to enhance our trails system to become a more truly multi-modal environment: Objectives • Develop a network of trails created or extended to provide adequate coverage for both commuting and recreational cyclists. Locations for east/west trails shall be identified and developed. • Acquisition of land for the proposed Green River Trail shall continue to be a priority. • Trail design and layout shall take advantage of unique natural locations and provide access to a variety of landscapes and habitats. • Participate in planning activities for regional trails in South King County and North Pierce County. • Explore possibilities for new trail connections between Auburn and neighboring communities. • Develop and maintain trails to comply with Americans with Disabilities Act. • Provide safe trail system by discouraging crime through environmental design concepts. • Develop a standardized interpretive and way-finding program to be used throughout our trail system. • Identify and provide funding to maintain existing trail systems. • 8 - New Parks-Expand our existing park inventory where level of service standards are not being met, with an emphasis on the West Hill and Lea Hill areas of the City. The development of new parks gives the community the unique ability to continue to shape the city in ways that are beneficial to all. Over the last two decades significant areas to the west and east of Auburn have been annexed into the City. Land acquisition is a fundamental requirement for new parks, and becomes increasingly challenging in economically difficult times. Optional methods for financing or acquiring land must be explored to meet the challenges ahead. Objectives • Make the development of community parks and linear parks with trail systems a priority over small neighborhood parks when possible and appropriate. • Apply for King County Conservation Futures grants and other available funding sources to acquire and preserve park land and natural areas. • Acquisition of community amenities, such as shoreline property, shall be emphasized, to preserve or allow public access to these special places. • Minimize land use conflicts between parks and other uses, and use sensitive design measures when locating parks in residential neighborhoods. • ORD.E Page 379 of 751 • Criteria for new park development ensures consistent high quality design meeting the needs of the community. • Develop Master Plans for undeveloped park properties and incorporate future park development costs into the Capital Facilities plan as appropriate. • Schedule public meetings as a part of the Master Planning process to ensure that citizen voices are heard and needs are met when developing new parks. • Develop public gathering spaces in the downtown core. ORD.E Page 380 of 751 0 13 LANK • PA G E S ORD.E Page 381 of 751 Chapter 5 : Our Park System Today Inventory & Recommendations Chapter 5 Our Park System Today Inventory and Recommendations Over its 113 year history, and under the leadership of past and present Mayors and City Councils, Auburn acquired property through donations, dedications and purchases to create the park system of today. Individual parks are evaluated and renovated periodically to assure they meet and exceed changes in recreational trends, and aesthetic appeal, safety and government standards. To serve both current and future residents, the City needs to continue to acquire new park land and to maintain and improve existing parks and properties. This chapter explores the city parks. We take a look at individual parks, listing facilities and making recommendations for future improvements. The recommendations that are listed for each park include the six year timeframe that this plan covers. Evaluation considers: location condition and appropriateness of recreation equipment amenities facilities maintenance aesthetic quality unique features recreational trends Much like the last Park Plan update, residents responding to the public opinion survey strongly overwhelmingly favored operating and maintaining the existing parks. To operate and maintain city parks and facilities (85 percent) had the highest percentage of important functions to provide in the city. The following pages will give us direction in the years to come for ways to accomplish these goals. Summary of Park Evaluation Although parks are unique, there are common conditions they share. The recreation components need to continue to be well-designed and maintained. Heavy use combined with natural aging requires rehabilitation. The Parks and Recreation staff have worked hard to develop strong recreation programs and build relationships with private teams and clubs that use City facilities so maintaining functional and aesthetically pleasing facilities is important. Parks and open space areas can provide a "green oasis" in an increasingly urban environment. Aesthetic improvements such as additional landscaping, improved site furnishings, and the screening of objectionable views are desirable to achieve this vision. • ORD.E Page 383 of 751 Summary of Needs Many needs fall into one of the categories summarized below. As parks age, they need annual maintenance as well as occasional minor and major renovations. • Prepare Plans —Prepare long and short term plans for the maintenance and development of all existing parks. • Rehabilitate Older Parks — Replace outdated recreation equipment. In some instances a complete redesign of a park or a use area is warranted. • Landscape Improvements — Rehabilitate old or overgrown plantings. Use sound environmental design to create aesthetically pleasing park and open spaces areas and to encourage intended uses. Use native and drought tolerant plants. • Provide Screening — Provide visual and physical buffers (such as landscaping) between two incompatible use areas, such as residences and active recreation areas. • Improve Site Furnishings — Provide more benches and seating, bike racks, wayfinding, water fountains, and trash receptacles. Remove old chain link fencing; where needed, replace with decorative fencing in highly visible locations. Black PVC coated chain link fencing in less visible locations. • Provide Additional Components — Add passive recreation components to parks, such as trails, nature walks, horticultural display gardens and art. Design attractive spaces for adult visitors adjacent to playgrounds. Take advantage of natural beauty and unique settings, such as views of the White River at Game Farm Park. • Design of New Parks — Build on the unique aspects of each site. Integrate historical information and artwork. Preserve mature trees. Locate parks so streets or greenbelts serve as buffers between the park and other uses. Meet accessibility requirements; design some facilities to encourage use by specific disabled users. Connect to neighborhoods with recreation/transportation trails. The Americans with Disabilities Act In 1990 the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed into law. This act implemented sweeping measures at the federal level, and focused on the importance of accessibility to publicly and privately owned facilities. In Washington state, additional accessibility design requirements have been rewritten into a single legal document, with enforcement responsibility placed in the hands of the local building officials. The regulations became effective July 1, 1992. Compliance with both state and federal law is required in Washington. Civil Rights Protection ORD.E Page 384 of 751 The ADA is legislation that gives civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities. It is an • anti-discriminatory law, not merely a compendium of architectural guidelines. The law is intended to assure that a person is not excluded from participation in an activity or place due to a physical or mental condition. The Department of Justice emphasizes the need to consult with disabled individuals or organizations representing the disabled to determine the needs and priorities of local citizens. • • ORD.E Page 385 of 751 Inventory of Parks and Recommendations Included in this section is a short description of each park in the City of Auburn and a list of recommended improvements for the next six years. These do not constitute a true maintenance or development plan, as suggested earlier, but give some idea of the major concerns in each park. Neighborhood Parks Neighborhood parks are a combination playground and park designed primarily for non- supervised, non-organized recreation activities. Features include: Size: Less than 5 acres Service Area: % mile radius Typical features: • Play Structure • Picnic Facilities • Walking Trail • Barbecue Grill • Open Space/Nature Areas • Outdoor Basketball Court • Multi-use playfields • Tennis courts Table 5-2: Existing Neighborhood Park Inventory: Park Acres 2151 Street Playground 0.17 Auburndale Park 9,74 Auburndale II(Und) 9.34 Ballard Park 0.68 Cameron Park 3.85 Cedar Lanes Park 8.36 Dorothy Bothell Park 4.35 Dykstra Park 1.67 Forest Villa Park 0.21 Gaines Park 1.33 Indian Tom Park 0.42 Jornada Park 1.89 Kersey A 2.73 Kersey B 0.79 Lakeland Hills Park 5.06 Lea Hill Courts 1.18 Riverpoint Park 2.95 Rotary Park 3.89 5cootie Brown Park 1.68 ORD.E Page 386 of 751 Shaughnessy Park 3.46 • Terminal Park 1.22 Village Square 1.10 TOTAL: 66.08 Acres Map Needs: Map of Neighborhood parks with 1/2 mile radius Photos: Photos of Neighborhood park Features 411 ORD.E Page 387 of 751 Neighborhood Park 21st Street Playground 405 21st Street SE 0.17 acres Dedicated in 2006 This small pocket park is situated adjacent to a City stormwater detention pond. Park amenities include a playground, picnic table, and benches. The park is on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Bike rack Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 4 Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s) 3 Other Notes: Playground in good condition and other park amenities are in good condition. Park History: The 21st Street Playground was constructed in 2006 with volunteers during the City's annual Clean Sweep event. The construction of the playground was primarily a result of the residents ORD.E Page 388 of 751 in the surrounding neighborhoods not being satisfied with the level of service for neighborhood • parks in the area. • ORD.E Page 389 of 751 Neighborhood Park Auburndale Park 31700 108th ST SE 9.74 acres Transferred in 2003 Auburndale Park fails into the neighborhood park category, and like many in this classification, is underused. The City is considering design options to create an entrance on the east side of the park in order to provide better access to the surrounding neighborhoods in an effort to increase use in the park. The main feature of the park is a natural wooded area with a loop trail. There is a play area, picnic tables and barbeque grill. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): _ Tennis Court(s): Other: Arbor Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail—1/4 mile walking trail Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 4 Barbeque Grill(s) 3 Other Notes: Playground in good condition, arbor in good condition, several trees in poor condition. ORD.E Page 390 of 751 • Park History: Transferred from the King County Parks Department in 2003.The name came from a designation of an area on old plat maps of the surrounding area of Auburn. Recommended Improvements • Remove and Grub blackberries in the eastern portion of the park • Construct entrance from 110th Ave. SE • New park entry sign • Install 3 new benches • Replace trash receptacles • Install new bike rack • Replace existing play structure Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • ORD.E Page 391 of 751 Neighborhood Park Auburndale Park II (Undeveloped) 29725 118th ST SE 9.34 acres Transferred in 2003 Auburndale II is an undeveloped park with a mix of native overstory, and an understory that is dominated by Himalayan blackberry and scotch broom. A future trail connecting Lea Hill to the valley floor is being considered, which would likely run east to west along the northern boundary of the park. Park History: Transferred from the King County Parks Department in 2003. The name came from a designation of an area on old plat maps of the surrounding area of Auburn. Recommended Improvements • Prepare a Master Plan to develop the park Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 392 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Ballard Park 1612 37th Way SE 0.68 acres Dedicated in 1966 Ballard Park is situated along the north side of the White River and has a view of the river, but there is no direct river access.The main feature of the park is a distinctive stone picnic shelter that is first come first serve. In 2003, a new playground and irrigation system was installed, as well as pathways and an entrance gate. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1/2 basketball court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Picnic Shelter Parking Stalls: _ Trail: Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 1+2 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) 1 Other Notes: Adjacent to Stuck River, all amenities in good condition. Park History: • ORD.E Page 393 of 751 Named after Dr. Levi Ballard, an early pioneer who, in 1.865, came with his wife from Oregon to the Puget Sound by covered wagon. He had planned to start a medical practice in Seattle, but that city already had two physicians. David Neely offered the Ballards hospitality when they arrived and settlers encouraged Dr. Ballard to stay in the White River valley. After leasing an old log cabin from the Neelys, they built a house near what is today, Third Street and Auburn Way North and later built another home at First and Auburn Avenue. Dr. Ballard founded the site of downtown Auburn and filed for the first plat of the town of Slaughter in 1886. Recommended Improvements • Renovate existing picnic shelter Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 394 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Cameron Park 3727 Lemon Tree Lane 3.85 acres Dedicated in 1989 Cameron Park is a nestled between two rows of houses, east of the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation. The park has two entrances, one near the intersection of Lemon Tree Lane SE and Academy Drive SE, and the other off of Lemon Tree Lane SE. Visitors can take an asphalt path into the heart of the park that winds through a large grassy open field, planted with occasional trees. A colorful play structure is located in the northeast corner of the park. Picnic tables next to the playground provide seating for picnics or for caretakers of young children. The layout of the path provides a good opportunity to integrate the play area into the rest of the park using landscaping to create a more lush and cohesive setting. A limiting factor in achieving this is the utility easement of Northwest Pipeline, which reduces the ability to landscape and improve some parts of the park. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): • Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Yes Basketball Court(s): 'A Basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) 1 Other Notes: All amenities in good condition. ORD.E Page 395 of 751 l Park History: Named for dairy farmer Bruce Cameron, who donated property for a park when his property was sold for a housing development. Recommended Improvements • Install landscape plantings around the perimeter of the park for screening from the surrounding neighborhood • Install two new picnic tables and concrete pads Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 396 of 751 Neighborhood Park Cedar Lanes Park 1002 25th Street SE 8.36 acres Dedicated in 1969 Cedar Lanes Park is a unique combination of native woodland, well-kept lawn, and a formal playground. The forested area contains a mix of western red cedar, big leaf maple, and cottonwood trees. Unfortunately, recent removal of the native understory has been done by the parks maintenance staff in order to improve site corridors, and deter transient activity and drug use. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Parking Stalls: 8 Trail: Trail Benches: 1 Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Playground in good condition. Park History: • ORD.E Page 397 of 751 Named for the development area in south Auburn and for the number of Cedar trees located on the property. The property was purchased with IAC money in late 1967. Recommended Improvements • English ivy and blackberry removal • Landscape restoration where understory has been removed • Fence repair • Kompan Free Play sports court • Regrade/repave parking lot • Community Garden Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 398 of 751 Neighborhood Park Dorothy Bothell Park 1087 Evergreen Way SE 4.35 acres Dedicated in 2009 Located adjacent to the Lakeland Hill Community Center, Dorothy Bothell Park is a an attractive neighborhood park in Lakeland Hills. Park amenities include a playground, climbing boulders, and a trail that connects with other trails beyond the park. Dinosaur bones have been buried in the play area for the kids to uncover. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Yes Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail Benches: 4 Picnic Tables: 3 Barbeque Grill(s) Playgrounds: Other Notes: Playground featuring a swing set, climbing boulders, climbing pets and hidden dinosaur bones for kids to uncover. All amenities in good condition. • ORD,E Page 399 of 751 Park History: Dedicated in 2009, the park was constructed through a partnership between the City of Auburn, Tucci & Sons, and Eagle Scout projects from Scout Troops #323, #401, and #510. It is named in honor of Dorothy Marion Bothell who devoted her life to her family, the family business and civic duty. Appointed in 1950, Bothell served as Auburn's first female council member and was also active on the Cemetery Board, served the Red Cross, organized the first chapter of the Women's Business and Professional Club, and was a member of many other local and regional service clubs. Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Dorothy Bothell Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 400 of 751 Neighborhood Park Dykstra Park 1487 22nd Street NE 1.67 acres Dedicated in 1979 Dykstra Park is a small, attractive park along the Green River. Its linkage to the larger Isaac Evans Park via a suspension bridge increases its value to the community. The bridge was substantially repaired in 2002, with major structural repair completed on the north end of the structure. Dykstra is primarily a playground neighborhood park, and its proximity to the river also makes it popular with walkers and wildlife lovers. A new playground was installed in April 2015 made possible by a Dr. Pepper/ Kaboom! Playgound grant. The playground was constructed using volunteer labor during the City's annual Clean Sweep volunteer event. In addition to the three new playground pieces, approximately 150 cubic yards of playground fibar wood ships were placed within the play area. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail connects to Brannan Park and Isaac Evans Park Benches: 1 Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s) Playgrounds: Other Notes: Footbridge over Green River to Isaac Evans Park, Adjacent to Green River. Play equipment in good condition, old play surface is hard. • ORD.E Page 401 of 751 Park History: Named after Henry Dykstra, an early pioneer and dairy farmer. Henry Dykstra emigrated from the Netherlands to Michigan in 1888 and relocated to the Puget Sound in 1895. During the Yukon Gold Rush he sold milk in Dawson and throughout the territory for seven seasons. In 1908 he purchased a 94-acre hop farm at Thomas, north of Auburn, calling it Maple Water Farm. He farmed and established a major dairy farm. The property remained in the family's hands until 1967. The park is located on two acres of the Dykstra's former farm. Recommended Improvements • Structural review of the Green River footbridge • Selective tree removal Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 402 of 751 Neighborhood Park Forest Villa Park 1647 Fir Street SE 0.21 acres Dedicated in 1971 The Forest Villa Park is located on small lot in a single family residential neighborhood. A play structure is the primary focus of the park. Park amenities include play equipment, safety surfacing, benches, landscaping, irrigation and a picnic table. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: • Trail: Benches: 1 Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s) Playgrounds: Other Notes: All amenities in good condition. Missing tire swing? Park History: Named for the development adjacent to the park. ORD.E Page 403 of 751 Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 404 of 751 • Neighborhood Park Gaines Park 1008 Pike Street NW 1.33 acres Dedicated in 1999 Gaines Park is located in the Vistaria/Sunning Hills residential area. This park is a joint project between the the City's Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation. There is a short section of boardwalk through a wetland area on the east edge of the park. The park has a picnic area, play area, 1/2 basketball court, and a walking trail through the park. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): %z Basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Walking trail Benches: 5 seats Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Picnic Area,Storm Retention Pond,Adjacent to wetland area, playground in good condition, but needs fibar wood chips. Park History: • ORD.E Page 405 of 751 Dedicated in May, 1999, and named for former Auburn Mayor Robert E. "Bob" Gaines, 1964- 1969. This park is a joint project between the Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation. Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 406 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Indian Tom Park 1316 6th Street NE 0.42 acres Deeded to the City in 1979 from King County This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. A playground was installed in April 2014 made possible by a Dr. Pepper/ Kaboom! Playgound grant. The playground was constructed using volunteer labor at the City's annual Clean Sweep volunteer event. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: • Trail: Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: New playground/swing set installed spring 2014, 1 bench is damaged. Park History: Named after Indian Tom,Tom Wil-Etch-Tid, a friend of the white settlers who saved the lives of Dr.John King and other pioneer children during the White River massacres during 1855. • ORD.E Page 407 of 751 Recommended Improvements • Install a ADA ramp at the play areas • Landscape improvements • Install additional picnic tables and benches Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 408 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Jornada Park 1433 U Court. NW 1.89 acres Dedicated in 2004 This small park is located on a single lot in the middle of a residential block. It contains a play structure, climbing wall, picnic tables and a short loop trail. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): % Basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Small Climbing Wall Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail—1/4 mile • Benches: Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) 1 Other Notes: All amenities in decent condition, most of the trail is unpaved, muddy and sloped with no stairs. Park History: Named for the neighborhood, the park was completed in 2004. ORD.E Page 409 of 751 Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Jornada Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 410 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Kersey A 5480 Charlotte Ave. SE 2.73 acres Dedicated in 20XX This park was constructed to meet level of service needs for a neighborhood park within in newly developed Kersey Ill nieghborhood. A paved walking trail with picnic tables and benches connects the ball field, to the playground and the basketball court. The park is on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Informal field with backstop. Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail—1/4 mile Benches: 3 Picnic Tables: 3 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Park is in relatively new, and in good shape. Park History: Named for the surrounding neighborhood. 111111 ORD.E Page 411 of 751 Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Kersey A Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features Neighborhood Park Kersey B 1433 U Court. NW 0.79 acres Dedicated in 2004 This park has similar features and amenities as nearby Kersey A, but on a smaller scale. This park is also on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1/2 Basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Small Climbing Wall Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Paved trail Benches: 3 Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Park is in relatively new, and in good shape. ORD.E Page 412 of 751 • Park History: Named for the surrounding neighborhood. Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Kersey B Park for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features Neighborhood Park Lakeland Hills Park 1401 Evergreen Way SE 5.06 acres Dedicated in 1993 Lakeland Hills Park serves the Lakeland development in south Auburn. This five-acre park is nestled into a wooded hillside, where many native trees were saved and integrated into the • design of the park. The park provides active recreation facilities at a neighborhood scale, and also a paved trail around the circumference of the park. Restroom facilities were built in this park and share a common structure with some water utility equipment. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): 1 Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Restroom Building, Picnic Shelter Parking Stalls: Trail: Trail Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 3 +4 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Native Woodland, all amenities in good condition. Playground equipment is older style wood. ORD.E Page 413 of 751 Park History: Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it. Recommended Improvements from 2006 plan • Replace and expand play structure Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 414 of 751 • Neighborhood Park Lea Hill Tennis Courts 32121 105th PI. SE. 1.18 acres The Lea Hill Tennis Court has a unique location on top of a City of Auburn water reservoir. Originally, two courts were constructed, but one of these is now being used as a basketball court. The remaining tennis court is not currently used for its intended purpose because vandalism to the net. The courts on Lea Hill, surrounded by an adjacent apartment complex. Standing water is evident in several low areas. Park Features: • Tennis Courts • Views of Green River Valley • 1/2 court Basketball Recommended Improvements • No recommendations for Lea Hill Courts for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • ORD.E Page 415 of 751 Neighborhood Park Riversands 5014 Pike Street NE 1.76 acres Dedicated in 2015 This pocket neighborhood park located is along the Green River near the northern City Limits. Visitors can gain direct access from the park to a bridge across the river that connects to the City of Kent's S. 277`h Street Trail (1.1 miles). The future Green River Trail will run along the eastern boundary of the park if the trail is ever extended through Auburn. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1/2 basketball court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 5 Picnic Tables: 2 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Adjacent to Stuck River, all amenities in good condition. ORD.E Page 416 of 751 • Park History: Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it. The park was turned over to the City if 2015 Recommended Improvements Park History: Named for the home development surrounding it and named by the company who built it. Neighborhood Park Rotary Park 2635 Alpine Street SE 3.89 acres Dedicated in 1966 Rotary Park was developed in 1966 by the Auburn Rotary Club. At first glance the playground is the only apparent facility here. The rolling topography, unusual shape of the site and the location of conifers obscure the presence of the other major recreation facilities, including the basketball court and informal softball field. An additional acre, and a half-court basketball was added to Rotary Park in connection with the development of the Riverwalk neighborhood. • In 2008 Rotary Park received an extreme makeover when an irrigation system was installed, grading was completed, landscape rocks were placed and new benches were installed. The Rotary Club of Auburn contributed to a new playground and helped with the installation of the equipment. The neighbors surrounding the park helped complete the project by planting nearly 300 plants and spreading beauty bark throughout the park. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): 1 Basketball Court(s): 1/2 Basketball court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: Picnic Tables: 2 • ORD.E Page 417 of 751 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: .25 Paved Trail (future). All amenities in good condition, playground missing spring toy. Park History: Named for the Rotary Club, who helped to secure funds for its development. Recommended Improvements • Construct ADA ramp into the play area • Landscaping improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 418 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Scootie Brown Park 1403 Henry Road NE 1.68 acres Dedicated in 1973 The park is located at a junction between commercial and residential zones. Bounded on the north by 8th Street N.E.,the park has a busy, open feel, with minimal landscaping. The City's youth baseball programs use this park for practice. Park Features: Playgrounds: Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): 1 Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): 1 Tennis Court(s): Other: Water Fountain, 1 set of Bleachers Facility: Parking Stalls: 31 • Trail: Benches: 2 in Dugouts Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Surface on courts in good condition. Park History: • ORD.E Page 419 of 751 Named for Stanley W. "Scootie" Brown, who was a popular high school baseball player nicknamed for his ability to "scoot" fast and get around the bases. He was a banker in Auburn for 56 years, and a member of the Kiwanis—with 35 years of perfect attendance. Recommended Improvements • Install a 6' tall black vinyl fence w/ pedestrian and vehicular gates • Landscaping and irrigation improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 420 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Shaughnessy Park 3302 21st Street SE 3.46 acres Dedicated in 1973 Shaughnessy Park is located in an attractive setting of mature Douglas Firs on a quiet residential street. Several recreational courts are located in close proximity to the street. An open play field with a backstop is in a corner of the park and is not readily apparent from other parts of the park and street. The adjacent residential neighbors have erected fences between their backyards and the playing field. Recent park improvements were made possible by a Neighborhood Block Grant in the amount of$50,000 Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years (2011-2015): • At Shaughnessy Park, renovations to the old tennis court included: removal of the asphalt and rock base of the court, removal of the old fence surrounding the tennis court, spreading 300 yards of topsoil and seeding the area to create a pleasant, open, lawn area. All of this work was accomplished with in-house staffing. (2012) • An irrigation system was installed. (2012) • The old dilapidated playground at Shaughnessy Park was replaced and a new picnic area was added. (2011) • The basketball court was resurfaced, the court painted and the basketball backboards and • hoops were removed, sand blasted and powder coated. (2011) • The volleyball court was converted to a pickle ball court, new asphalt was laid and the court was painted. (2011) • New sidewalks to the basketball court, playground and picnic area were installed.(2011) • During Clean Sweep, volunteers removed the old playground, and cleaned out ivy and other noxious weeds from the hillside and wooded areas. Volunteers also spread beauty bark in landscape beds and repainted the practice wall. A Neighborhood Block Grant in the amount of $50,000, helped fund the park improvements. (2011) Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Playfield with backstop Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): 1 Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: • ORD.E Page 421 of 751 Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 4 Barbeque GriII(s) Other Notes: Everything in almost new condition. Park History: Named for former Mayor James N. Shaughnessy who served from 1960—1964. As a member of a pioneer family and an avid historian, Mayor Shaughnessy was one of the founders of the White River Historical Society. Recommended Improvements • Ball field improvements— New backstop • Landscaping and irrigation improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 422 of 751 Neighborhood Park • Terminal Park 1292 C Street SE 1.22 acres Dedicated in 1913 Terminal Park is a small park along a quiet residential street. The newly renovated playground at the center of the park is the focal point here. The remainder of the park contains a slightly rolling lawn, with mature trees scattered throughout. Improved irrigation has also been added. In 2013 broken patio pavers were replaced with colored concrete in the patio adjacent to the playground. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): 1 Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): • Other: Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 3 Picnic Tables: 3 Barbeque Grill(s) 2 Other Notes: Playground in good condition, maple tree in NE corner should be removed. • ORD.E Page 423 of 751 Park History: In the 1920s was the first park developed in Auburn and named for the terminal end of the railroad, and the neighborhood where the railroads workers lived, Terminal Park. Recommended Improvements • Landscape improvements • Turf improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 424 of 751 Neighborhood Park 10/ Village Square 12111 SE 310th Street 1.10 acres Tranferred in 20XX This is a small pocket park is located in the middle of an apartment complex. The park has a short loop trail with a small grassy area in the middle. Access to the park can either be gained from the adjacent apartment complex or from SE 310th Street. The park is on a short list of parks that need to go through the naming process. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): 1 Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: • Facility: Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 3 Picnic Tables: 3 Barbeque Grill(s) 2 Other Notes: Playground in good condition, maple tree in NE corner should be removed. a ORD.E Page 425 of 751 Park History: This park was transferred from King County in 20XX and named for the surrounded apartment complex. Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 426 of 751 Community Parks • Parks providing active and structured recreation opportunities for all ages. They often exceed 10 acres in size and may have sports fields, water playgrounds or bodies of water, garden, nature trails, or similar features as the central focus of the park. Community parks can provide indoor facilities to meet a wide range of recreation interests. They require more support amenities such as parking and restrooms than neighborhood parks. Community parks serve a much larger area than neighborhood parks and offer more facilities. Where there are no neighborhood parks, the community park serves as the neighborhood park function. The service area covers a one to two mile radius. Size: 10+ acres Service Area: 1-2 mi. radius Typical features: • Children's play structure • Picnic facilities • Sports fields • Tennis Courts • Bodies of Water • Gardens II • Nature Trails • Parking • Restrooms Park Acres 104 'Ave SE(Lower Green River 14.73 Housing Bend Property) Brannan Park 21.68 Fulmer Park 5.04 Game Farm Park 57.20 Game Farm Wilderness 48.50 GSA Park 5.31 Isaac Evans Park 19.87 Jacobsen Tree Farm(und.) 29.30 Lea Hill Park 5.26 Les Gove Park 14.68 Mill Pond Park 4.20 Roegner Park 19.22 Sunset Park 15.15 Veterans Memorial Park 7.67 Total 267.81 acres Map Needs: Map of Community parks with' mile service radius 0 Photos: Photos of Community park Features ORD.E Page 427 of 751 Community Park Brannan Park 1019 28th St. NE 21.68 acres Dedicated in 1973 Brannan Park contains one of Auburn's most heavily used sports complexes. The City sponsors many sports events at Brannan Park; Cascade Middle School users and a variety of organizations—youth soccer leagues, and Little League - also use the playing fields extensively. Brannan Park is on a flat, open site, with the Green River forming the park's eastern boundary. The remaining sides are bounded by residential housing to the north and west, and Cascade Middle School to the south. Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years: • Over 200 volunteers joined forces with Delta Air Lines employees and representatives from KaBoom! to build a new playground at the park. (2013) • King County completed the Reddington Levee setback project, increasing flood protection and improving fish habit associated with the Green River. In addition an approximate 1-mile paved trail along the top of the levee was connected to the park. (2013) • New energy efficient Musco lights were installed on Fields #2 and #3; and new fencing, bleachers, soccer goals, and turf surface improvements were made possible through funds donated Auburn Youth Soccer Associated and a King County Youth Sports Facilities Grant (YSFG). (2009) • Field 4 received new surfacing, fencing, bleachers, and soccer goals with a YSFG from the Washington State Conservation Office (RCO). (2008) • The irrigation system was completed. (2003) • A complete loop trail within the park was constructed that has a connection to the levee trail. (2002) • Lights on Fields #1 and #2 were installed to provide more efficient lighting for the ball fields less intrusive to the neighborhood. (2002) • The outfield fence for Field #2 was replaced and arborvitae was planted. (2001) • A skatepark was constructed, and picnic tables and benches were added to the adjoining area. (1999) Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 _ Softball Field(s): 2 Baseball Field(s): 1 Soccer Field(s): 1 Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Skate Park ORD.E Page 428 of 751 Facility: Restroom Building, Concession Stand Parking Stalls: 174 Trail: Paved Trail -0.66 mile (connects to Green River Trail) Benches: 5 +22 in Dugouts Picnic Tables: 4 Barbeque Grill(s): Other Notes: Park History: Named after the families of brothers William and Joseph Brannan who homesteaded in the White River Valley in the mid-1800s. William Brannan and his wife were killed during the early Indian wars. Joseph married Sarah Henness in 1857.They purchased the Meeker Farm in Kent in 1858, and finally moved to their donation claim near Auburn in 1868. Recommended Improvements • Asphalt Pavement Repair & Overlay • Remove & Replace Concrete Curb • • Demolish Backstops & Dugouts on Field #4 • Field Illumination • Landscape/Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • ORD.E Page 429 of 751 Community Park Fulmer Park 1005 5th Street NE 5.04 acres Dedicated in 1979 Fulmer Park is primarily an active sports facility. In 2015 an undeveloped area on the north side of the park was bladed, all of the blackberry bushes were removed, and a new perimeter fence was installed. New irrigation, perimeter landscaping, and grass seed was added in 2014. New backstops, fencing, dugouts and drinking fountains, as well as scorekeeper tables, were added to the park in 1998. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 _ Softball Field(s): 2 Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: 2 Water Fountains Facility: Restroom Building Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 1 + 12 in Dugouts Picnic Tables: 1 Barbeque Grill(s): Other Notes: Playground is in decent condition, a bit beat up but stable. ORD.E Page 430 of 751 Park History: Named for a former Auburn retailer, Frank Fulmer, who owned an ice cream business in Auburn and was ilknown for giving ice cream to children in town. Gene Colburn was on the Park Board and promoted naming the park for him. Recommended Improvements • Replace & Expand Play Structure & Sitework • West Parking Lot Repair, Overlay & Striping • Remove & Replace Curb • Sports Field Illumination Upgrade • Landscape/Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 431 of 751 Community Park Game Farm Park 3030 R ST SE 57.20 acres Dedicated in 1988 Game Farm Park continues to be one of the largest and most frequented parks in Auburn. The park contains a wide variety of facilities for organized sports activities as well as a distinctive natural setting. The hillside backdrop and the White River along its southern edge create an intimate setting for park for users to enjoy. The park with its many courts, fields and picnic facilities is heavily used. Game Farm Park was dedicated in 1988 and exhibits many successful design features. Designing and building the park in one phase resulted in functional architectural features and site layout. Passive uses such as trails or open grassy slopes are located where the park abuts residences. Good pedestrian access is available to the surrounding neighborhood at several points along the park's perimeter. A trail head off of Forest Ridge Drive SE provides access to a relatively unimproved gravel trail along the river in the eastern portion of the park. Notable Park Improvements in Recent Years: • A $20,000 Dr. Pepper/Kaboom! Grant helped to replace and expand the large playground in the eastern portion of the park. Additional work in the vicinity of the playground included a new sitting wall, concrete sidewalk, and new benches were also installed. (2012) • The patio area between baseball fields #2 and #3, and the patio in front of the baseball concession stand were resurfaced. (2012) • The basketball courts were surface painted to match the tennis courts and pickle ball courts. (2012) • The City received a $58,500 KC YSFG to make improvements to the tennis courts at Game Farm Park The tennis court improvements included repairing root damage, repainting playing surface, installing a practice wall, installing a fabric wind screen, and removing trees that were causing damage to the courts. (2011) • The City received a $225,000 Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant to accommodate lighting improvements. Fourteen light poles and 142 light fixtures were replaced with 6 light poles and 40 energy efficient light fixtures on the turf fields at Game Farm Park. (2010) Park Features: Playgrounds: 2 Softball Field(s): 3 Baseball Field(s): 1 Soccer Field(s): 2—synthetic turf Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): 2 Tennis Court(s): 4 Other: Facility: Picnic Shelter, Len Chapman Amphitheater, Outdoor Exercise Stations Parking Stalls: 303 Trail: Trail Benches: 15 + 16 in Dugouts ORD.E Page 432 of 751 Picnic Tables: 31 Total, 16 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) 7 Total,4 in Picnic Shelter • Other Notes: Sports Complex, Adjacent to Stuck River. Everything is in pretty good condition, except for missing play structure. Park History: The park is built on a historic wild game refuge once owned by the King County Game Commission. In 1933, ownership was transferred to the Washington State Department of Game. It was an experimental facility for bamboo partridge, quail, ring-necked pheasants, tinamou and other exotic birds. In 1978 the land transferred ownership to the State Parks and Recreation Commission. The City of Auburn signed a long-term use agreement in 1984 which provided that the City cooperate with the State Parks to develop the 160-acre site as a park. Recommended Improvements • • Remove & Replace Synthetic Turf on Rectangular Field 1 • Remove & Replace Synthetic Turf on Rectangular Field 2 • Improve Parking Lot Drainage • Resurface Paved Trails • Demolish Existing Care Takers Residence Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • ORD.E Page 433 of 751 Community Park Game Farm Wilderness Park 2407 Stuck River Dr. SE 48.S0acres Dedicated in 1989 Game Farm Wilderness Park emphasizes a connection with the natural environment. It has limited development and has preserved most of the native woodland along the White River. The White River Trail continues along the river on the north side of the park from Kersey Way beyond the east end of the park. The park is designed for both overnight and daytime visitors. The camping area is designed to accommodate recreation vehicles, providing each unit with water and power hook-ups. Park Features: Playgrounds: Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): _ Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: RV Camping Area Facility: Restroom Facility, Picnic Shelter, Day Camp Area Parking Stalls: 40 Trail: Trail conects to Roegner Park Benches: 20 Picnic Tables: 34 Barbeque Grill(s) 19 Fire Pits Other Notes: Park History: This property was built by the state Department of Parks on land that was formerly a game and wildlife area. This area was part of the Washington State Department of Game property across the White River, which is now Game Farm Park. ORD.E Page 434 of 751 illiRecommended Improvements • Landscape Improvements • Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail • Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 435 of 751 Community Park GSA Park 413 15th St. SW 5.31 acres Dedicated in 1966 The land for GSA Park was donated to the City by the U.S. General Services Administration. Its location in a heavily trafficked industrial zone has resulted in an atypical park setting. Currently the park has two youth softball/baseball fields, a parks maintenance building, and dugouts. New dugout covers were recently added, made possible by donations from Auburn Little League. A greenhouse is located on the property near the maintenance that is used by the City's horticulturist to propagate new plants. The completion of the two fields was completed in 2003, including drinking fountains and an asphalt trail to the ball fields. The park is in need of a play structure and a restroom facility. Park Features: Playgrounds: Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): 2 _ Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): _ Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): _ Other: 4 Bleachers Facility: Greenhouse, Park Maintenance Shops Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 8 in Dugouts Picnic Tables: 2 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: 12 picnic tables and one set of bleachers are stored here during winter months. Park History: Named for the General Services Administration, which is located south of the park. The property was granted by this group. ORD.E Page 436 of 751 Recommended Improvements • Install A Concession Pad For Mobile Concession Stand • • New Restroom Facilities • Improve Open Playfield Area In The Northern Portion Of The Park Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 437 of 751 Community Park Isaac Evans Park 29827 Green River Road SE 19.87 acres Dedicated in 1989 Isaac Evans Park is a riverfront park providing valuable passive recreation opportunities for the citizens of Auburn. The park's connection to Dykstra Park via the suspension bridge increases its accessibility to local residents and is an appealing feature for visitors. The pedestrian bridge may also accommodate future trail connections between the eastern and western sides of the river. A internal paved trail runs around the circumference of the park. The forested riparian area along the Green River remains in a natural condition with recent restoration plantings added to accommodate the Reddington Levee Setback project located across the river from the park. Scattered throughout the grassy space on the inside of the trail are clusters of picnic tables, a picnic shelter, restroom facilities, and playground equipment. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): 1 Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Building _ Parking Stalls: 57 _ Trail: Trail connects to Dykstra Park Benches: 5 Picnic Tables: 21 Total,4 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) S Other Notes: Access to Green River. Playground is old wood style but in decent condition. Park History: ORD.E Page 438 of 751 Dedicated in 1989, and named for an early pioneer, who farmed along the Green River • Recommended Improvements • Parking Lot Improvements • Replace Play Structure • Repair Paved Trail • Landscape And Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 439 of 751 Community Park Jacobsen Tree Farm Park (undeveloped) 29387 132nd Ave. SE 29.30 acres Transferred in 2003 The Jacobsen Tree Farm property is an undeveloped park located in the Lea Hill area of Auburn. The City went through a master planning process for the future park, which was completed in 2010. Future elements of the park include soccer fields, baseball fields, play grounds, and passive recreational opportunities. The park is adjacent to Arthur Jacobsen Elementary and Auburn Mountainview High School, and has magnificent views of Mount Rainier. A bond or levy will be needed in order to develop this large community park property. Park History This undeveloped park property was transferred from King County to the City of Auburn in 2003, and the area was annexed into the City of Auburn in 2007. Historically the site was a tree farm that was owned and operated by the Jacobsen family where they grew a variety of evergreen and birch trees. Recommended Improvements • Explore funding options to develop the park Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 440 of 751 Community Park Lea Hill Park 1111 31693 124th Ave. SE 5.26 acres Dedicated in 2013 Lea Hill Park is a community park that serves the Lea Hill neighborhood and is located adjacent to the Green River Community College Campus. Park amenities include a skate park, pervious walking pathways, a rentable picnic shelter, an amphitheater, baseball field,free game synthetic sport area, half basketball court, and a play area featuring a tractor and climbing toys. An ADA accessible restroom facility with two unisex bathrooms and drinking fountains was completed in the spring 2015. A$60,000 KC YSFG helped fund the synthetic sport area and a $20,000 KaBOOM! Dr Pepper Snapple Group Construction Grant helped fund a portion of the playground equipment. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): 1 Soccer Field(s): 1 small-scale soccer and multipurpose synthetic turf field Open Play Field(s): yes Basketball Court(s): 1/2 basketball court • Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): 1 Other: Skate spot Facility: Picnic Shelter,Amphitheater area Parking Stalls: Trail: Benches: 4+7 Seats in Playground Picnic Tables: 8 Barbeque Grill(s) 2 Other Notes: Public Art—Strawberry Calf by Michael McLaughlin S ORD.E Page 441 of 751 Park History: The park was previously located near the corner of SE 320th Street and 124th Ave SE, but only contained a full sized baseball diamond and a softball field. The old location was the home field for the Green River Community College baseball and softball teams, and was also used by Auburn Little League. The property where the park is today was acquired as part of a land exchange with Green River Community College that occurred in 2012. The current park is located just north of the original park property. Recommended Improvements • Landscaping Improvements • Resurface Synthetic Turf On Kompan Free Game Court Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 442 of 751 Community Park Les Gove Park/Les Gove Community Campus lip 9109th St. SE 14.68 acres Dedicated in 1966 Les Gove Park is a recreational and educational facility serving the entire community. The Library, Parks and Recreation Administration Building, Community Center, Teen Center, Senior Center, the White River Valley Museum, and a variety of recreational features make Les Gove a very popular destination. A Park Master plan was completed in 2015 in order to help define park elements, and create a roadmap for near term and long range planning concepts for the entire campus. A major outcome of the Master Plan was to establish the Auburn Community Campus that features Les Gove Park. The park has residential development on roughly three sides, and is bound by 12th Street SE to the south and Auburn Way South to the west. Existing entrances to the park are not ideal, as they pass through residential or commercial settings, and can be unclear to a first time visitor to the park. Approximately 3/4 of Les Gove Park is developed with a youth softball field, patios, a splashpad, the Discovery Playground, and a concrete pad used for kids concerts in the summer. The remaining portions of the park are comprised of grassy open areas used during special events in the park. Park Features: Playgrounds: 2 • Softball Field(s): 1 Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): yes Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Spray Park; Bocce Courts, Outdoor Exercise Stations Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Building Parking Stalls: 0 Trail: 1/2 mile looped trail Benches: 23 +2 in Dugouts Picnic Tables: 19 Barbeque Grill(s) 1 Other Notes: Includes Gymnasium, PRAB Admin Building, Senior Center, White River Valley Museum, Auburn Library and Les Gove Building, (accessible) Discovery Playground, Rotary Spray Park, Views of Mt. Rainier. 10 benches are located in the bocce court, 25 seats at spray pool. 4111 ORD.E Page 443 of 751 Park History: Named for former Mayor Leslie J. Gove, who served from 1936— 1946 and again in 1955 for only two months. Gove was mayor during the time the park property was converted from undeveloped land to a housing development for war workers. When the property was approved for the development of a fifteen acre park in 1960, Councilman Fred Towner was instrumental in getting the park named for Mayor Gove. Mayor Gove's family members were early pioneers in the area, who moved here in 1875. They farmed north of Auburn and put in the first water system in the area, giving them running water from a source on the West Hill to their back porch. Future Community Center The construction of a 21,000+square foot Community Center and Teen Youth Center began in August 2015, and is expected to be completed in June 2016. The multi-use and multi-generational building will be used for educational, cultural, social activities, and will house Park Administration staff. Emphasis for the community center will be made on creating spaces that will attract teens and encourage cross- generational interactions with the existing neighboring teen center. The community and teen center will be created by renovating the existing Parks and Recreation Building (approximately 7,300 sq. ft.) and adding approximately 13,700 sq. ft. of new building space. Gymnasium The 9,859 sq. ft. gymnasium was opened in October 2011 at the Auburn Community Campus. Participants can drop-in to a variety of programs, including open gym basketball, volleyball, pickleball and futsal (indoor soccer); a youth after-school program, an indoor playground designed for ages 5 and under, family nights, and rock climbing instruction. Organized programs include volleyball and basketball leagues, specialized recreation leagues, preschool sport classes, and rock climbing classes. Additionally, birthday party packages are offered using the gymnasium as an activity center complete with a party host, pizza or a birthday cake, and treat bags for birthday party guests. The facility is also available for rentals and other special events. Senior Center The Senior Center is a 12,000 square foot, one story, brick structure, constructed and completed in 2002. The structure features a large room dining/meeting area which will hold 200 people, a commercial kitchen, meeting rooms, a pool hall, computer lab, and a large reception/gathering area. Library The City of Auburn and the King County Library system entered into an agreement where a new library building was constructed and completed within the Community Campus in 2012, owned by the City, but a branch of the King County Library system. The library is at the southwest corner of the park, with access gained from Auburn Way South. Museum The White River Valley Museum, cooperatively managed by the City of Auburn and the White River Valley Historical Society, is located behind the Library in Auburn Community Campus. It is also a one story building. Inside is a reconstruction of a log cabin, the reproduction of Auburn's Main Street at the turn of the century, a caboose representative of the railroad history of Auburn, and a representative ORD.E Page 444 of 751 display of the Native Americans and other early residents of the area. Additionally, the museum has revolving exhibits on a variety of historical subjects and a unique gift shop. Outdoor features include illantique farm machinery displayed in an enclosed area. The farm machinery will likely be relocated to the Olson Canyon site in the future. Recreational Area The outdoor recreational component of Les Gove Park is found primarily in the south 2/3 of the park. A half-mile paved trail encircles an attractive bermed and treed area including 100 flowering cherry trees given by the Japanese Sister City Lions Club of Kasuga-Cho in 1984. Other recreational features include a softball field, informal play fields, splash pad and, and bocce courts. The water playground located in Les Gove Park is one of the city's favorite features for young children. Currently, a single playground site serves the park. In June 2014 the Auburn community celebrated the opening of the 32,000 sq. ft. Discovery Playground. This unique playground features accessible surfacing; play opportunities that support all levels of development; elevated sand tables, water, and auditory elements; a cozy spot to gather; areas to swing, spin, balance, roll and play. The rocks at the highest level near the hill slides represent Mt. Rainier and two textured walking paths characterize the White and Green Rivers, The amazing support and community involvement in this project is proof once again that Auburn is a City with incredible heart. A community fundraising team was formed to raise $300,000 for the project and a community design team of agency professional, occupational therapy professionals and a youth representative helped to design the playground. Donations were received by 71 separate funding sources, including individuals, corporations and businesses, granting agencies, foundations, service clubs, children and service providers. IDRecommended Improvements • Multi-Purpose Building Renovations • Lighted Crescent Concrete Walk From South Parking Lot to Community Center • H Street Extension • Roundhouse Pavilion Near The White River Valley Museum • South Parking Lot Overlay • Site Furnishings • Deals Way Demolition • New Restroom • Paved Trail Overlay • Construct New Section of Paved Trail in the Southern Portion of the Park • Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • ORD.E Page 445 of 751 Community Park Mill Pond Park 4582 Mill Pond Dr. SE 4.20 acres Dedicated in 1997 Mill Pond is unique in several ways. The park is a joint project between the Parks and Public Works Departments, the Auburn School District, and the developer of Lakeland Hills. All of these groups came together to create a park with a dual purpose: to provide a recreational experience in a natural setting, and to provide stormwater detention and filtering for a 400 acre area. The site includes a permanent pond, a grass-lined bio-swale that becomes a temporary pond during storms, a 1/4 mile paved trail around the circumference of the ponds, and a fishing dock. Fishing in the pond is limited to children under 15. Park Features: Playgrounds: Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Fishing Pond Facility: Parking Stalls: 0 Trail: Trail Benches: 2 Picnic Tables: 3 Barbeque Grill(s) Other Notes: Combined stormwater and park facility Park History: ORD.E Page 446 of 751 The park was named after Mill Creek, which runs through it. This joint project between the Storm Water Division and Parks and Recreation, has a three-story- deep water retention vault under the tennis courts. • Recommended Improvements • No improvements are recommended for the 6 year timeframe Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • 11111 ORD.E Page 447 of 751 Community Park Roegner Park 601 Oravetz Road SE 19.22 acres Dedicated in 1994 This community park is located along the banks of the White River, adjacent to Auburn Riverside High School. A trail system includes both hard and soft-surfaced sections that meet the needs of many different users, including equestrians from the nearby Hidden Valley neighborhood. Trail construction in 1997 from the east side of Roegner Park to Kersey Way and continuing east along the river to Game Farm Wilderness Park and beyond. An approximate 1/2- acre off-leash fenced dog park is located near the trail, and can be easily accessed from the parking area off of Oravitz Road. Commissioned artwork for the park includes a uniquely designed bench with a salmon motif, placed to allow views of the river. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): _ Open Play Field(s): Yes Basketball Court(s): _ Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Facility: Picnic Shelter, Restroom Facility Parking Stalls: 40 Trail: Trail Benches: 16 Picnic Tables: 29, 6 in Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) 4 Other Notes: Public Art. Swing set is in good condition. Playground equipment has several rotting boards which need replacing. Several picnic tables and benches have rotting, broken or missing boards needing replacement. Park History: ORD.E Page 448 of 751 Named for former Councilman and Mayor Bob Roegner (1982 —1993) 0 Recommended Improvements • Replace Play Structure • Drainage Improvements • Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • 0 ORD.E Page 449 of 751 Community Park Sunset Park 1420 69th St. SE 15.15acres Dedicated in 2003 Sunset Park was developed by the developer in Lakeland Hills. It is unique in several ways. The community park serves the Lakeland Hills neighborhood but also the community. The site includes a picnic shelter, two youth baseball/softball fields, trails, basketball court and skatepark. Fundraising and planning efforts began in early 2015 for a splashpad with a targeted completion date tentatively set for summer 2016. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): _ 2 (youth baseball/softball) Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): 1 Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Skate Park Facility: Restroom Facility, Picnic Shelter Parking Stalls: 154 Trail: Trail (s?) Benches: 4 + 12 inside Dugouts Picnic Tables: 16, inside Picnic Shelter Barbeque Grill(s) 2 Other Notes: All structures are in good condition. Park History: ORD.E Page 450 of 751 This park was designed and developed by the developers of Lakeland Hills in conjunction with the City of Auburn. The name was selected by a citizen's group, who decided to name it for the wonderful views of the sunset from the park. Needs Assessment from 2006 plan The park was completed in 2003 and is in good condition, requiring regular ongoing maintenance. Recommended Improvements • Splash Pad • Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 451 of 751 Community Park Veterans Memorial Park 405 E St. NE 7.67 acres Dedicated in 1926 Veteran's Memorial Park, formerly City Park, is a popular community park located close to downtown Auburn and adjacent to Auburn High School's Memorial Stadium. The park is distinctive for its Veterans Memorial structure, shady woods and underlying expanse of green lawn. The Veterans Memorial structure was funded with donations and fund-raising events by local veterans groups. Its design and construction were accomplished with use of volunteer labor. Park Features: Playgrounds: 1 Softball Field(s): Baseball Field(s): Soccer Field(s): Open Play Field(s): Basketball Court(s): V2 basketball Court Pickle Ball Court(s): Tennis Court(s): Other: Backyard Idea Garden Facility: William C. Warren Building (capacity: 74) Parking Stalls: 40 Trail: Benches: 8 Picnic Tables: 10 Barbeque Grill(s) 2 Other Notes: Six benches are concrete,two are in Backyard Idea Garden. Spray pool has been removed. Playground is in good condition. Park History: Formerly named City Park, the park was dedicated and opened in 1926, and was "touted as the largest, most up-to-date and complete (park) in all the surrounding country". Money for the park came from a 1924 bond issue and the property was purchased from the Faucett family. Renamed in 2000 to honor Auburn Veterans groups who built the Veterans Memorial in the park. ORD.E Page 452 of 751 Recommended Improvements • Selective Tree Removal • • Resurface Basketball Court • Landscaping and Irrigation Improvements Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features • • ORD.E Page 453 of 751 Community Park 104th Ave SE (undeveloped) 31495 104th Ave. SE 14.73 acres Transferred in 2006 This undeveloped riverside property is comprised of two parcels along the Green River. A nice sandy beach along the Green River is popular for swimmers in the summer, and fishermen in the fall and winter months. Nearly two-thirds of the park is located within the 100 floodplain so given the location of the park along the river and regulatory constraints, the park will likely be designed as a passive use nature park. Park History: The 104th Ave property was transferred to the City through acquisitions from Washington State Parks through a grant from the Recreation and Conservation office, and the other from King County. Recommended Improvements • Develop Master Plan Map Needs: Map of Park—Aerial/Detail Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 454 of 751 • Open Space Open space areas are land that is largely undeveloped,and that has been left in a natural or natural appearing condition.Other areas in the inventory are included with their respective park. Size:varies Service Area:Not applicable Typical features: • Nature Areas • Wildlife Area • Specific Park left in natural condition for future development • Wetland area Table 5-4:Existing Open Space Inventory: Open Space Acres Auburn Environmental 190.91 Clark Property 26.68 Game Farm Open Space 26.00 Golf Course 40.98 Lakeland Nature Area 46.07 Mary Olson Farm 47.00 West Auburn Lake 9.25 Total 386.89 acres Map Needs:Map of Open Space areas Photos:Photos of volunteer events Auburn Environmental—For the purpose of this plan the Auburn Environmental Park(AEP)has been divided up into open space and special use areas. The open space area is comprised a large undeveloped Category II wetland area bisected by SR 167,while the special use area is comprised of the parcels of land where the boardwalk and bird tower are located. On the east side of SR 167 there are two large wetland mitigation areas along Clay Street NW. One of the mitigation,known as Thermod has a large pond,and was installed to compensate for impacts associated with the Emerald Downs Race Track Facility. The other large mitigation area was installed to accommodate the City's B Street Corridor project. The Interurban trail runs up the east side of much of the AEP. On the west side of SR 167 Mill Creek and an associated wetland flows north across the property. The west side of SR 167 is the site of a large future stream relocation known as the Wetland 5K project where Mill Creek will be relocated back to its relic channel. Construction of the Wetland 5K project is expected to be completed in fall 2015. Clark Property Forested open space area along the White River Trail,just west of R Street. The property is located on both sides of Oravitz Road. Bowman Creek crosses this property along the toe of the slope below Oravetz Road before flowing into the White River • ORD.E Page 455 of 751 Game Farm Open Space- Undeveloped forested area located on a plateau in the northeast portion of Game Farm Park, This area overlooks the White River to the east and is bordered by the a residential development to the north. A trailhead is located off of Forest Ridge Drive SE in the residential development that provides access to a trail system through the forested area. The discrete trailhead is located between two homes and is fairly difficult to find if you don't know that it is there. This area has been a popular spot for transient camps,which has resulted in limited use of the area by park users. Golf Course Open Space—Mostly forested area located on a steep west facing slope along the eastern edge of the golf course. A power line easement runs east west across the northern portion of this area. Lakeland Nature Area Assemblage of parcels located west of Fire Station 33 in the Lea Hill area of the City. The property contains forested wetland areas,but the extent of these areas is currently unknown. This park property will likely be a passive use park with a trail system, but a master plan is needed in order establish near term long term plans for the site. Mary Olson Farm Open Space—Forested area on a west facing slope in the eastern portion of the Mary Olson Farm Property. These areas contain very large mature trees that overlook the farm. Olson Creek flows through a steep ravine from the east before flowing across the property and into the Green River. Olson Creek supports five different species of salmon,as well as steelhead trout and bull trout. Three of the fish species supported by Olson Creek are protected under the Endangered Species Act. West Auburn Lake—This property is located at the terminus of S.320th Street in the West Hill area of Auburn. Access to the site can gained from the west via S 320th Street or from the east via W Street NW. The site contains an approximate 2-acre lake,with approximately 7 acres of mature forested upland area. A Master Plan was developed for the park in 2013. Future site improvements identified in the Master Plan include a trail around the perimeter of the lake,a parking area at the end of S.320°' Street,viewpoints with benches,invasive species control,and the installation of native plantings. ORD.E Page 456 of 751 Special Use Areas Special use areas are miscellaneous public recreation areas or land occupied by a specialized facility. Some of the uses that fall into this classification include small landscaped areas,community gardens, streetscapes,environmentally sensitive areas,viewpoints,historic sites,and other specialized areas. Size:Generally very small,"leftover"spaces Service Area:Not applicable Typical features: • Landscaped Areas • Community Gardens • Viewpoints • Historic Sites • Nature Areas • Traffic Islands • Specific Park or Recreation Areas • Environmental Park Existing Special Use Areas Inventory: Special Use Areas Acres B Street Plaza 0.10 Bicentennial Park 1.07 Centennial Viewpoint Park 0.70 City Hall Plaza 1.10 *lark Plaza 0.25 ommunity Garden A 1.04 Community Garden B 0.39 Environmental Park 16.84 Fenster Nature Park 12.58 Fly-in Lion 0.02 Golf Course 139.71 Mary Olson Farm 20.0 Mountain View Cemetery 46.57 Pioneer Cemetery 0.77 Plaza Park 0.02 Slaughter Memorial 0.02 TOTAL 254.77 acres I ORD.E Page 457 of 751 B Street Plaza-a small pocket park in downtown Auburn featuring artwork Bicentennial Park-Green open space park at Auburn Way and Hwy 18 Clark Plaza-small pocket park at the corner of Auburn Way North and 15th Street NE. Morningcrest-a landscape area at 58th&24th NW Slaughter Memorial-small pocket park at Auburn Way North with the memorial commemorating the battle of Slaughter Fly-in Lion-Small pocket park located at the south end of Scobee Field(Auburn airport)with benches to watch the Airplanes take off and land. The park is located on King County transit property at the northeast corner of a park and ride. ORD.E Page 458 of 751 • Special Use Area Centennial Viewpoint Park 402 Mountain View Dr. 0.7 acres Dedicated in 1991 Centennial Viewpoint Park was created in 1991,during Auburn's Centennial year.As its name implies,it is blessed with tremendous views of the Green River Valley,the Cascade Range,and Mount Rainier beyond.The park is tucked into a small spot along Mountain View Drive,across the road from Mountain View Cemetery.This small park functions primarily as a scenic overlook.A bronze sculpture of a deer standing on a log,overlooking the valley,was commissioned by the Auburn Arts Commission for the site. Park Features: • Artwork • Picnic tables • Views of Mt.Rainier Park History:Was developed by the Auburn Rotary Club during Auburn's centennial year celebration. • • ORD.E Page 459 of 751 Special Use Area Environmental Park 413 Western Avenue NW 16.84 acres plus 190.91 acres of open space Designated in 2004 The Auburn Environmental Park(AEP)has been divided into open space areas and special use areas. The special use area of the AEP is located in the southern portion of the park. Here visitors will find a birding tower and an elevated boardwalk through a large wetland area. The boardwalk extends north from West Main Street to the birding tower,which located off of Western Ave NW. An information kiosk,picnic tables and a parking area are also located off of Western Ave. NW. Park Features: • Wetland Mitigation Areas • Bird tower • 1,200 foot elevated boardwalk with interpretive signs • Picnic tables Park History: In 2004 City Council passed a resolution expressing interest in the Environmental Park Project. The formation of the AEP was made possible through a number of land acquisitions between 1996 and 2014, which resulted in a permanently protected area 207 acres in size. Recommended Improvements • Trail Connection Between Boardwalk and Interurban Trail • Construct Boardwalk in Northern Portion of Park • Routine Maintenance and Inspections to Boardwalk Structure ORD.E Page 460 of 751 • Special Use Area Fenster Nature Park 2033 4`h Street SE 12.58 acres Acquired in 1996 Fenster Nature Park is located along the Green River where the river flows into the City limits. Two phases of buried revetments have been constructed on the property,Fenster I was completed in 2008 and Fenster II was completed in 2014. Upon completion of these revetment project the areas were planted with native vegetation. A sandy beach located along the Green River is a popular spot for swimmers and tubers. The beach is actually located upstream of Fenster Nature park on property owned by King County,but visitors must cross through the park in order to gain access to this area. Parks staff is currently working with a consultant to a develop a design for a river access for emergency responders,drift boaters, rafters,and tubers. Park Features: • Swimming and tubing access to the Green River • Access to a trail system located upstream on King County property • Public fishing access Park History:The northern portion of the property was acquired through a series of land acquisitions that occurred between 1994 and 2014. The southern portion of the park was purchased in 2006 from m he Fenster Family,who owned and operated a farm along the river. 0 ORD.E Page 461 of 751 Special Use Area Auburn Golf Course 29630 Green River Rd SE 139.71 acres plus Open Space of 40.98 acres A full-service 18-hole facility,the fair but challenging par 71 course is just over 6,450 yards and hosts over 50,000 rounds of golf each year.Services include a pro shop,equipment and power cart rentals, professional instruction and lessons,tournaments and leagues,and youth activities. The majority of the course is in the valley,with four holes on the hillside overlooking the valley. The Auburn Golf Course offers an assortment of top notch facilities.Our Pro Shop has much of the newest gear at great prices. If you are hungry after your round of golf,be sure to stop in for a bite at our new Bogeys restaurant Park Features: • 18 hole golf course • Clubhouse • Putting Green • Views of Green River and Mt.Rainier Park History:The City purchased the Green River Golf Course in the 1960's. It was a 9-hole course on the north end of the current site, built in the late 1940s.After the city took over,it was developed from 9- hole to 18-hole course. Recommended Improvements • Working with Golf Course Superintendent to determine recommended improvements ORD.E Page 462 of 751 • Special Use Area Mary Olson Farm 28728 Green River Rd NE 20 acres plus 47 acres of Open Space land Purchased in 1993 The City applied for and received King County Conservation Futures funding to purchase the historic Mary Olson Farm in 1993.The funding stipulates that the Farm can be developed for passive recreation and open space use only.The 67-acre Farm is on the National Register of Historic Places,and is a King County Landmark property.The private canyon in the center of the farm includes a farmhouse,large barn,a weaving house,and several other out buildings surrounded by forested hillsides and two meadows.The Mary Olson Farm is the most intact 1880s family farm in King County.The buildings,and to some extent the landscape have required extensive restoration.To that end the buildings have been leased to the White River Valley Historical Society so that they can be economically and quickly restored using grant funds. The Farm includes many important historic features:a wagon road;seven historic buildings,an heirloom orchard;four runs of salmon in Olson Creek;two meadows;all surrounded by forested hillsides.The City intends to continue restoration efforts on the Farm and its environment to use as a living history museum attracting school groups and members of the general public.The wagon road will be able to connect area trails and bicycle routes in the area.In 2000 an award winning Master Plan was developed for the Farm,and in 2004 an Operations Plan was developed,creating a year by year plan leading to full •program offerings and public access in 2014. Park Features: • Historic Farmstead • Meadows • Bluff and Creek Park History: Named after the matriarch of the early settler family who purchased the land in 1879—Mary Olson. 2015 Needs Assessment Since 2014 the Farm has been fully restored and has been undergoing specialized maintenance care. That work must be ongoing and constitutes an annual investment. Future projects include recreation of the historic footbridge over Olson Stream,reclaiming land from blackberries and other invasive species and returning that land to native growth and producing hay fields.Future improvements will include the development of trails;acquisition of uphill canyon land as a conservation easement;development of an interpretive site dealing with Native American fishing and gathering;replacement of the caretaker's mobile home;installation of interpretive artwork to enhance the walking experience;and development of additional programs that share this remarkable site with a boarder audience. Map Needs:Map of Park–Aerial/Detail 0 ORD.E Page 463 of 751 Photos of Park Features ORD.E Page 464 of 751 • Special Use Area Mountain View Cemetery 2020 Mountain View Dr. 60.00 acres Mountain View Cemetery is nestled on 60 acres of property overlooking the Mt. Rainier and the Green River Valley. Mountain View offers an urn garden,adult graves,columbarium niche walls,and a special section for veterans and their spouses.The Cemetery was established in 1890 when 40 acres of land were purchased.In 1945,a group of local businessmen formed the Thousand and One Club to transfer the cemetery to the City of Auburn. In 1947,the cemetery was endowed,ensuring that maintenance of the grounds would be continued into the future. Park Features: • Children's Place and Veterans Section • Urn garden • Niche walls • Mausoleum • Views of Green River Valley and Mt.Rainier Park History: Mountain View was established in 1890,a year before the town of Slaughter(now Auburn)was incorporated.This is the resting place of some of the early pioneers who settled in Washington Territory. "recommended Improvements • er to determine recommended improvements • ORD.E Page 465 of 751 Special Use Area Pioneer Cemetery 8th&Auburn Way N. 0.77 acres Pioneer Cemetery, located at 8th N.E.and Auburn Way North,near Fred Meyer.The land was donated in 1878 to the town of Slaughter,Washington Territory,for a cemetery. It was only active for 20 years due to spring flooding. In 1917,land on the east edge was given to the Buddhist Church at Christopher for use by the Japanese community. Burials at Pioneer Cemetery are rare,as only cremated remains of descendants who were originally interred there are eligible.The grounds at this historical site are under the care of the Cemetery Division of the Parks Department. Park Features: • Ornamental Iron Artwork Park History: Donated to city in 1878. ORD.E Page 466 of 751 • Schools and Other Public Lands People don't use only parks for their recreation.Other public lands and private facilities must be considered in evaluating the sufficiency of our public park system.In Auburn,schools are one of the largest contributors to recreation space other than the City parks. Schools School grounds are natural gathering places for neighborhoods—there is usually one within walking distance of every home in the city.In addition,school grounds have features,which,at a minimum, include sports fields,grassy fields for open play,and sometimes play equipment and basketball courts. School facilities vary in their accessibility and availability.During the school year these are in use by the school throughout the day and often after school hours.This limits their use by individuals or non-school leagues.Also,some sports fields are too small or not in prime condition considered necessary for league play.For these reasons school facilities are considered to be valuable components in the community's total recreational resources, but cannot replace a strong public park system. Map shows the location of all schools within the study area.Table 5-6 summarizes the facilities found at Comment(jwkJ]:There Is no map of schools In Auburn School District properties.Note:the Auburn School District extends beyond the Auburn City Auburn. Limits. Other Public Lands Several properties are used informally for recreation purposes are owned by public entities.The major properties are identified below: sable 5-6 UPDATE:Auburn School Facilities School Facilities (do we need to add playgrounds to this list) list needs to be updated Elementary Schools Alpac .2 youth baseball/softball fields Chinook .4 youth baseball/softball fields Evergreen Heights 2 youth baseball/softball fields Gildo Rey .2 youth baseball/softball fields Ilalko 2 youth baseball/softball fields Lakeview 3 youth baseball/softball fields Lea Hill 12 youth baseball/softball fields Dick Scobee 12 youth baseball/softball fields Pioneer 3 youth baseball/softball fields Terminal Park 2 youth baseball/softball fields Washington 2 youth baseball/softball fields Middle Schools Cascade 1 Football Field with Track, Gymnasium with 1 basketball court,Annex 2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields S ORD.E Page 467 of 751 Mt.Baker 1 Football Field with Track, 2 Gymnasium 3 Baseball Fields,90'&65'fields 3 Softball Fields Olympic 1 Football Field,Track, Gymnasium with 1 basketball court 2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields Rainier 1 Football Field,Track Gymnasium with 2 basketball court 2 Baseball/Softball Fields,90'&65'fields _Senior Hi h Schools _ 1 Football Field synthetic turf with Track (Lighted), 8 Tennis Courts 15 Gymnasiums Auburn Riverside High 1 Basebal Field,90' infield, 3 softball fields 1 Football Field synthetic turf with Track(Lighted), 8 Lighted Tennis Courts Gymnasium with 2 basketball court Auburn Senior High 1 Baseball Field,90' infield 1 Football Field with Track, 6 Gymnasiums, 8 Tennis Courts Auburn Mountain View High 2 Baseball Fields,90' &65'fields, 2 Softball Fields 1 Baseball/Softball Field,65'infield West Auburn High i1 Gymnasium ORD.E Page 468 of 751 • Auburn Water Utility The watershed areas owned by the Auburn Water Utility.These have restricted access in order to maintain water quality.Coal Creek Spring Watershed in south Auburn is the major source of the city's water supply.The West Hill Watershed is considered a secondary water source;its location next to an elementary school make it a popular spot for neighborhood walks.Public use of these areas is presently discouraged by the Water Utility. King County Parks King County Parks owns several developed and undeveloped properties in close proximity to the planning area.While existing Auburn parks are more convenient to Auburn residents than most King County properties,recreation users are not restricted by civic boundaries,therefore some of these parks can be expected to serve Auburn residents. The Green River Trail is a King County regional trail project that currently winds more than 19 miles from Cecil Moses Park near Seattle's south boundary to North Green River Park in south Kent near Auburn. The section of the Green River Trail that extends south from the City of Kent has stalled out in recent years due to private property issues,but there is still hope that one day it will extend through Auburn. A section of the trail was constructed in 2014 as a part of the Reddington Levee project near Brannan Park, which could easily be extended north to S.277"h Street. The section of the Green River trail south of Brannan Park presents many private property challenges,and may have to follow surface streets in order to make it to Fenster Nature Park and beyond. &tate of Washington The State of Washington owns an easement along the west side of the Green River in certain locations through the city.Much of the easement runs directly behind residences where access is allowed for fishing only.The Washington Department of Natural Resources also owns a quarter section of land in southeast Auburn.The land is not used for recreation at this time. S ORD.E Page 469 of 751 ORD.E Page 470 of 751 • Chapter 6 : Recreation and • Cultural Programs Chapter 6 Recreation and Cultural Programs Auburn—an Active Community The City of Auburn Parks, Arts & Recreation Department provides opportunities for the public to participate in diverse recreational programs and activities designed to meet the needs of the community. These programs include preschool, youth, teen, and adult leisure programs; youth, teen, and adult athletics; fitness and wellness programs; programs designed to provide social and recreational opportunities to senior citizens and those with special needs, as well as a host of special events and cultural activities suitable for the entire family and community at large. The City of Auburn Parks, Arts & Recreation Department has an active series of recreation and cultural programs. Survey results show over 75% of the city's population participate in at least one of these programs with over 30% participating on at least a monthly basis. Analysis of recreation programs repeatedly revealed the need for indoor spaces for many types of athletic, cultural and recreational activities. Current programming is conducted at the Parks,Arts and Recreation Administration Building, Senior Center, City Hall,the multi-purpose building at the Auburn Community Campus,the William C. Warren Building at Veterans Memorial Park, and various school district facilities. The addition of a gymnasium in 2011 has allowed for increased athletic programming opportunities. A new community center and teen center are slated to open in 2016; adding to the inventory of spaces available for programming a robust schedule of activities and programs for the community. A Variety of Departmental Programs Programs within the Parks,Arts & Recreation Department are divided into five major activity areas: • Athletic Programs • Leisure and Education Programs • Health and Wellness Programs • Heritage and Preservation Programs • Cultural Programs: Arts and Events City residents are offered a broad selection of leisure time activities contributing to social interaction, physical recreation and health, and cultural and artistic enrichment.The components of each program area and the future needs are described individually in this chapter. Some general conclusions and recommendations are also made about all programs offered by the City.This overview guides the City's direction to maintain the high quality of its recreation programs. ORD.E Page 472 of 751 According to the 2015 survey,the top programs and activities that Auburn residents have a combined high and moderate level of participate in (regardless of the location) are as follows (Question#10): • Running or walking—88.74% • Visiting nature/wildlife areas—77.56% • Attending community special events— 59..58% • Bicycling—55.07% • Attending live theater/concert performances—54.73% • Nature/Environmental education—46.69% • Using exercise equipment-45.68% • Recreation swimming—44.86% • Adult fitness/health/wellness classes—40.54% The same survey asked respondents what recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (either by the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize.Their combined highest and moderate likelihood of use was as follows (Question #11): • Festivals or events—77.69% • Fitness/health/wellness programs—64.59% • Volunteer opportunities—57.08% • Performing arts(dance, music, theater, etc)—51.87% • Outdoor sports—51.31% • Nature and environmental education—51.09% • Enrichment and self-help classes—49.80% • • Visual arts—43.26% • Indoor sports—41.60% The survey also asked respondents what recreation programs by age groups should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize.Their combined highest and moderate likelihood of use was as follows (Question #12): • Adults—68.03% • Teens (middle & high school)—65.77% • Elementary school youth—41.29% • Seniors (at or near retirement)—40.89% • Toddlers/preschoolers—27.44% • Developmentally Disabled (all other ages)— 12.84% • Developmentally Disabled (school age)— 12.34% Conclusions/Recommendations for All Recreation Programs 1. Increase Awareness: Continue to increase awareness of recreation programs by trying new marketing avenues, including social media outlets. • ORD.E Page 473 of 751 2. Expand offerings for general fitness, health and wellness programs.According to survey results, there is a higher interest level among residents for offering general fitness, health and wellness programs (64%)than outdoor sport leagues (51%) or indoor sport leagues (41%). 3. Class Scheduling: Offer classes with both daytime, evening and weekend hours,to meet the needs of those without traditional 8-to-S work schedule. While space shortage has impacted this in the past, the addition of a new community center and youth/teen center will aid in class scheduling. Continue to seek additional spaces, either through rental, lease or purchase for indoor recreation programs in heavily dense neighborhood areas, such as Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill. 4. Families, Neighborhoods&Cultural Connections: Reinforce family structure and interaction by offering activities or outings suitable to families. Continue to offer some programs at neighborhood locations, thereby strengthening the role and identity of neighborhoods in the city. Continue to seek ways to engage different cultures in recreation programming, through activities,food experiences, and social gatherings. Based on survey results, 87% of respondents want programs offered for all ages. 5. Nature and Environmental Education: Increase exposure to the natural world through activities and fun learning opportunities at suitable locations. As parks are developed around wetlands and other natural areas, residents and students can be involved in all stages, from design to implementation and maintenance. Adult environmental education can also inform residents of the functions and value of our open spaces (and the care and awareness of our urban assets). Survey results indicate that over 50%of respondents would be interested in nature and environmental education programs. The Environmental Park, Fenster Nature Park, Mary Olson Farm, and the undeveloped West Hill Lake property all have the potential to offer programming focused on environmental education. 6. Topics for Recreation Programs: Direction for recreation program topics are gleaned from several sources, including the public opinion survey conducted in 2015, direct requests to the Department, national and regional trends, and recommendations by staff members, the Park& Recreation Board and the Arts Commission. The survey is an especially rich source of ideas for activities, both for learning what recreation activities residents are currently participating in and what activities they would like to see offered by the City of Auburn Parks, Arts & Recreation Department.The Recreation Needs Assessment should be reviewed periodically to generate new strategies for recreation programming. ORD.E Page 474 of 751 Athletic Programs The Auburn Parks, Arts& Recreation Department organizes various seasonal sport leagues for adults, teens, kids and families as well as opportunities for drop-in programs. Additionally the City maintains general outdoor recreation facilities including trails, tennis courts, basketball courts, bocce courts, disc golf, skate parks, and a municipal golf course. Many area residents participate in the athletic programs sponsored by the City's Parks,Arts& Recreation Department. In 2014, approximately 4,500 youth and adults participated in these programs, a decrease of approximately 15 percent since 2004. With the addition of a gymnasium in 2011, opportunities for drop-in play have been added; with over 4,000 individuals taking advantage of that option. Drop-in play is suited for those with flexible schedules; rather than more structured schedules as is seen with organized leagues. Several explanations can be given for the decreasing recreation rate for organized athletic programs, with the most common factor being there are a variety of options available to residents to meet their recreational, health, and fitness needs other than organized athletics. Additionally, many people have a perception of less leisure time in their lives today. 411 Residents have the opportunity to become involved in many sports activities, and can participate as an individual, or as part of an organized team or league. Programs are provided for both youth and adults, and are further divided into coed programs, and all male and all female programs. Survey results show that 51%of the city's population would like Parks, Arts& Recreation Department to offer outdoor sport options and 40%would like indoor sport opportunities. Adult Athletics: Adult athletic programs revolve primarily around the sports of softball, basketball, volleyball and flag football. With the addition of a new Gymnasium in 2011, dodgeball and futsal (indoor soccer) have been added as options for adult athletics. Soccer plays a smaller role in Department offerings, as there are many outside leagues that offer soccer. Since the opening of the Gymnasium in 2011, open gym volleyball, pickleball, and basketball programs are averaging over 4,000 drop-in players annually. Programs such as flag football and basketball still attract primarily men, although they are open to all players.There is a growing trend of people doing more family centered activities and other individual sports and activities. Adult athletic program offerings should be directed at meeting the needs of individuals and families. Youth Sports- Youth sports programs are offered for children from age 3 to 18 and vary seasonally.The main focus is on recreation, team work, learning and fun rather than high-level competition. Preschool sports, through a "Let's Play Sports" program are hugely popular and require parent participation.They help lead children to playing in additional sport programs offered by the Department. Youth sport S ORD.E Page 475 of 751 programming has diversified beyond soccer, baseball and fastpitch and the Department now also offers cross country, girl's volleyball, track& field, flag football, climbing, dodgeball and a select basketball league to give children a larger pool of athletic activities in which to participate. Specialized Recreation Athletics: The department offers both a sports and Unified Sports program in the sports of Basketball,Volleyball, Roller-skating, Bowling, Soccer,Track& Field, Cycling, Swimming and Softball. In Unified Sports Programs, athletes and partners, those with and without developmental disabilities, participate on teams together. Cooperative efforts with the Auburn High School staff has resulted in partnered social programs. Programs partnered with the Community Lab at the AHS has produced mentorship and life skills programs. With two wheelchair accessible buses, the department is able to transport participants to and from events and programs. Athletic Programs Needs/Recommendations 1. Continue/Expand family sport programming 2. Expand individual oriented athletic options—running, walking club 3. Flexible scheduling for drop-in programs 4. Track sport trends and interests such as Ultimate, pickleball, disc golf, lacrosse, rugby, bocce 5. Increase Participation by Women and Girls: Continue to expand the co-ed, women's and girls programs as new recreation facilities are provided. Investigate ways to inform more women of the women's athletic programs. 6. Partnerships: Continue to partner with schools and other providers to increase program offerings and participation. Coordinate with the local school district to maximize use of current facilities. 7. Offer Programs in New Sports: Experiment with offering athletic programs/classes in new or developing sports such as, disc golf, futsal, mountain-biking, foot golf, bike courses. Place an emphasis on family and individual oriented programs. 8. Gymnasium Space: City-owned and scheduled gymnasium space is needed to maintain the current course offerings. An increase in gymnasium space is needed if these very popular programs are to be expanded to keep up with the community's growing population. ORD.E Page 476 of 751 • Leisure and Educational Programs A wide range of recreation programs, including instruction in arts and crafts, dance, music, community education and special events are offered through the Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Department. Existing leisure and educational programming falls into various age categories: preschool; youth; teens; adults; seniors; individuals with specialized needs; and families. Programs fluctuate based on community interest, seasons, availability of instructors and facilities. Survey Results Although the City provides programs for all ages and categories;the public opinion survey is useful in determining the likelihood of use in each area by residents. The survey asked respondents what recreation programs by age groups should be offered in Auburn (by the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize. Their combined highest and moderate likelihood of use was as follows (Question #12): • Adults—68.03% • Teens (middle& high school)—65.77% • Elementary school youth—41.29% • Seniors (at or near retirement)—40.89% • Toddlers/preschoolers—27.44% • Developmentally Disabled (all other ages)—12.84% • Developmentally Disabled (school age)—12.34% Preschool Programs,Ages 1-5: Preschool programs provide classes in movement, crafts, sports, and innovative holiday activities. The availability of facilities affects which classes are offered. With the opening of a new gymnasium in 2011, a new Indoor Playground program was initiated that allows parents to bring their preschool aged child for socialization and fun! The department provides balls, games, mats, riding toys, climbing toys and more in the Les Gove Gymnasium. Approximately 3,000 registrations occur on an annual basis. Most preschool classes are offered at Les Gove Park's Multi-purpose Building, as are many other events. This is inconvenient for preschool programs, because the room, supplies and materials must be continually set up and taken down, in order not to interfere with other uses. Movement classes such as ballet and gymnastics are held at buildings that are not well-suited to these activities, as they do not provide the mirrors, bars, and other equipment or settings needed for effective learning. The opening of a new Community Center in 2016 should help to alleviate these current challenges. Youth Programs, Ages 5-10: Youth programs consist of arts and crafts,gymnastics, dance, sports, acting, music, science, and social and personal skills. Summer activities include a variety of day camps, sport camps and specialty camps. Most recreation programs are currently directed toward youth 10 years old and under. S ORD.E Page 477 of 751 Leisure & Education Program— Preschool/Youth Needs & Recommendations: 1. Design and add a mobile recreation bus with activities that can be taken into the community for the introduction of recreation activities to school-age children. 2. Work with the Auburn School District to introduce school-based before and/or after school recreation activities to encourage activity and healthy habits in youth. 3. Expand multi-generational programming and Family Programming; Tweens/Teens, Ages 11-19: Like communities around the country,Auburn is struggling with concerns for its young people and the challenges they face today. The City employs two positions focused on teen programming. These staff members have worked over the last 20 years to engage teens in recreation programs, provide information and marketing materials specifically geared for teens about program and service opportunities; and developed relevant and diverse opportunities for young people. An evaluation of the existing athletic and recreation programs reveals that 11 to 15 year-olds participate primarily in the athletic programs offered by the City; however a popular Teen Late Night program; and several Middle School programs have given teens greater opportunities.Additionally, the Department coordinates the Auburn Youth Council which provides teen leadership and server/earning opportunities. The Youth Council meets on a regular basis to plan service projects and fundraising events. Another factor to consider in planning for teens is the large number of low-income families in Auburn. Nearly half of Auburn residents fall into the low or very low income categories, making it difficult for many families to pay for recreational activities for teens who are able to care for themselves during out-of-school time. Providing facilities and programs with a positive social or recreational environment is seen as key to counteracting some of the negative behaviors and activities occurring when teens "just hang out." With the increasing options for social media; the department needs to be creative about engaging tweens/teens in programming options. Developing appealing programs for this age group may need to involve teens and be more creative in approach than for other ages. The City is currently repurposing the current Parks, Arts& Recreation Administration Building into a Teen Center and programming for Teens will increase in June 2016. Leisure & Education Program—Teen Program Needs & Recommendations: 1. Improve Facilities: Improve existing facilities and develop additional facilities to provide a variety of recreational, cultural and artistic opportunities for teens in the community. Develop methods to evaluate recreation facilities and establish standards and criteria to improve existing facilities. 2. Assess Needs and Interests of Teens: Assess the recreational, cultural and artistic needs and interests of teens in the community on an ongoing basis. Use a youth specific evaluation tool for activities, programs and classes in order to meet the many varied needs and interests of teens today. This may mean offering"non-traditional" activities not available at schools. 3. Accessibility to Programs: A Fee Waiver Program allows many low-income residents to attend recreation classes and programs. While the Fee Waiver Program helps, more flexibility may be ORD.E Page 478 of 751 needed for families in need who don't meet the United States Department of Agriculture Child Nutrition Program Income guidelines. Consideration for providing more youth and teen oriented programs at low or no cost encourages greater participation. Improved public transportation and an improved pedestrian/bicycle network will enable more teens to attend activities. Further develop partnerships with the local school district to expand transportation opportunities to and from programs. 4. Teen Center Programming: A variety of low to no cost drop-in programs and structured fee based programs will be provided. Provide middle school and high school specific programs. 5. Expand Sports Programs: Increase and expand sports programs for teens by developing an intramural sports program to encourage greater participation. 6. Outreach to "At Risk"Teens: Perform outreach activities connecting"at risk" teens to recreational programs. This will establish a connection to the community. 7. Creative Marketing: Current trends will continually be assessed to maintain relevant marketing. Adult Programs: All adult programs are available to persons 18 and over; some are available to those 14 years and over. Adult recreation offerings include classes and workshops. Instructors are selected based on their qualifications, and local interest in the programs they offer. Staff and student evaluations of instructors and courses help to maintain high quality course offerings. Most adult programs are held at the Senior Activity Center, the Parks, Arts and Recreation Administration Building,the Multi-purpose 1111 Building in Les Gove Park and School District buildings when necessary/available. However, senior programs have first priority at the Senior Activity Center, which limits the availability of this facility and the number of adult programs that can be offered during the day. 68%of the survey respondents noted that adult recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (Question 12); the highest percentage of responses within that question. Leisure & Education Program—Adult Programs Needs & Recommendations: 1. Facility Space:The Community Center opening in 2016 will offer the opportunity for expansion of adult programming. Additionally, adult programming will be offered in neighborhood venues. 2. Programming: Survey results, as well as opinions expressed to Parks and Recreation staff, indicate a larger selection of community education programs is desired. By keeping abreast of emerging recreational trends and areas of public interest,the Parks,Arts and Recreation Department can continue its tradition of offering a series of broad ranging and well-received classes and programs. By tracking trends and identifying areas of interest, program deficiencies can be identified and corrected. 3. Course Evaluation: Course offerings should continue to be reviewed on a regular basis to evaluate the instructor's performance and suitability of the facility and program. Enrollment, opinion surveys and other means should continue to be used for evaluation purposes. • ORD.E Page 479 of 751 Senior Programs: Comprehensive programming for ages - 50 and over focuses in Recreation and Leisure includes a wide spectrum of programs, and achieve this involving both staff and participants in decision-making. One of the big challenges of programming for this population is the wide span of ages- from 50 to 95+.The difference in interests, abilities and needs shifts dramatically in this forty plus year range. A diverse offering is provided including but not limited to trips and tours; exercise and fitness; Silver Sneakers—Heathway Membership; outdoor adventure; hiking; volleyball; pickle ball; Wii bowling league; in house social events such as movies and parties, games, cards, billiards, puzzles, computer lab. Classes and programs change monthly, but often include arts and crafts, academic classes, computer, dance and fitness classes. Topics are as varied as AARP Divers Safety,oil painting and consumer interest. Several support services are also offered for seniors, including classes on Social Security,wills, health insurance,tax counseling. Volunteers are provided through SHIBA (Senior Health Insurance Benefit Act) program to help seniors resolve questions about Medicare/Medicaid and seniors' rights. Leisure & Education Program—Senior Programs Needs & Recommendations: 1.. Marketing: The ability to better market senior programs is integral to reaching more people. Young retirees may feel they are too young for the Center, creating one type of marketing challenge. On the other hand, communicating with the frailer, home-bound elderly must be accomplished with a different approach.The Center's many different programs and services are suitable for people of many different ages and interests. Additional funding for effective marketing to promote and inform residents of the Senior Center's offerings is necessary to move beyond current participation levels. 2. Program Changes: Types of programs offered have changed as the interest of todays 50 plus has changed. We have seen a large increase in numbers participating in outdoor adventures, extended travel, cultural offerings and fitness. We need to continue to look beyond the next few years to address the changing needs of our aging population.We now see more instances of delayed retirement age, increased lifespan, diversity in interests, diversity in financial resources, and in cultural diversity.To meet these and other new demands, an analysis of both service planning and facility plans for the next 10 to 20 years should be undertaken. Expanded services in the areas of wellness, exercise and support services must be explored. Counseling and mental health services as well as expanded medical services must be considered. We are seeing an increased number of mentally ill older adults in our programs.Transportation of seniors to Senior Center programs should be considered in future Senior Center planning, as should outreach services for the frail elderly and expanded adult day care services. Meeting the needs of minority elders in our growing ethnically diverse population must also be a focus. The possibility of more off-site programming and/or expansion of existing facility would also be useful, as is exploring the Senior Center's role in city-wide human services discussions and senior housing projects. 3. Staff: With the projected changes in the aging population and social service needs mentioned as well as the projected need to increase rental revenues, there will be a corresponding need for additional staff. ORD.E Page 480 of 751 • Specialized Recreation: The Parks,Arts and Recreation Department offers social, educational and athletic opportunities for youth, teens, adults and seniors with special needs.A calendar of events published every three months, lists classes, sports and activities offered. The Young Generation Club is a program designed to meet the social and recreational needs for developmentally and physically disabled persons,ages 18 and up. Inclusionary and unified sports programs offer opportunities for individuals both with and without disabilities to participate together.The focus is on similar abilities, not differences. Emphasis is on providing understanding, disability awareness, building active participation for all people and involving families. It would be a goal to implement additional programs that focus on collaboration, which embrace diversity, where people with and without disabilities live, learn and play together. Specialized Recreation Programs Needs & Recommendations: 1. Children with Special Needs: Continued growth in inclusionary programs for children under 12 are encouraged. Although the schools have a good educational program for the developmentally disabled,there are few social or recreational outlets available for these children, with the exception of athletic events such as the Special Olympics, which are open to children age 8 and above. 2. Transportation:Transportation to programs is an ongoing challenge for many people in this population. Few participants are able to drive or own a car,thus public transportation becomes • vital. Recreational classes are held at various locations throughout the community. These programs occur primarily in the evenings and on weekends, when bus service is at its lowest level. Increased ACCESS Metro service and City of Auburn wheelchair-accessible buses have helped. Improved bus service, wheelchair-accessible vehicles, and pedestrian and bike facilities are essential to serving this group of users. Ongoing input should be provided to the transportation planning process, to improve service to these locations. 3. Program Costs: Financially,this group has extremely limited resources.The scholarship and fee waiver program is necessary for many of these residents to be able to participate. Maintaining the scholarship and fee waiver program and offering programs for children are priorities for this population. 4. Staffing: This population may require a higher staff to participant ratio in programs due to special needs. Additional staff training may be required. 5. Program Growth: Expansion of new and existing programming for specific specialized recreation programs as well as inclusion and unified programs. Health & Wellness Programs A wide range of health and wellness programs, including fitness classes, nutrition programs, cooking classes, community gardening, and a seasonal Farmers Market are offered through the Auburn Parks, S ORD.E Page 481 of 751 Arts and Recreation Department. Existing health and wellness programming crosses all age categories and is often offered to families. Programs fluctuate based on community interest, seasons, availability of instructors and facilities. A recent Health Impact Assessment was conducted by Studio 3MW as a baseline for the City's Comprehensive Planning efforts.The baseline assessment for the Auburn HIA studied the following determinants of health: population health outcomes, urban form, the public realm (parks, open spaces, public places and streets) physical activity and the food environment. Understanding how these determinants of health influence community members' ability to make healthy choices helped to identify needs and opportunities for City actions to improve access to healthy living resources. Key findings of the Health Impact Assessment suggest that community health outcomes could be improved through the following types of interventions: eliminating natural and man-made mobility barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists, improving sidewalk connectivity, improving the pedestrian environment, increasing the number of mixed use areas that provide goods and services, improving transit access, increasing the number of destinations located within walking distance of homes, increasing the number of healthy food sources within walking distance of homes and schools, improving safety and perceptions of safety,and eliminating affordability as a barrier to healthy food and physical activity. Key community and geographic features contribute to urban form, mobility and access to goods and services. Geographic districts within the City include: The Auburn valley floor districts (North Auburn, South Auburn & Downtown) and hill districts (West Hill, Lea Hill, Lakeland, Southeast Auburn). Auburn includes over 30 square miles in land area, views of rivers,wooded hillsides, natural areas and Mount Rainier, annexed hill areas developed to County standards without sidewalks and few connecting streets. These features form barriers to connectivity and physical activity and create isolated districts within the City. Auburn is a diverse community in many ways. The City's median age is 33.5, more than ten percent younger than the State average. Approximately 30 percent of residents identify as a race or ethnicity other than white or Caucasian. Of these residents, approximately ten percent are Asian and Pacific Islander,five percent are African American, two percent are American Indian and Alaskan Native, and five percent are another race or ethnicity.Thirteen percent of residents identify as Hispanic or Latino. One quarter of residents speak a language other than English at home. A higher proportion of Auburn individuals and families face financial hardship compared to those in King County and Washington State. Auburn's median income is $54,329, about 24 percent lower than the King County median, and nine percent lower than the State median. The unemployment rate in Auburn is over ten percent. Approximately fifteen percent of Auburn families live on incomes below the federal poverty level. Over half of the students in the Auburn School District are eligible for free or reduced lunch. Low-income and minority populations are generally at greater risk of poor health status and poor access to healthy living resources. These population groups make up a significant portion of Auburn's community; however,they are not uniformly distributed throughout the community. Auburn has relatively poor community health outcomes. Compared to other cities in King County, it has the lowest life expectancy, highest rate of diabetes, one of the highest rates of obesity, and one of the highest rates of inactivity.The health outcomes of students in the Auburn School District are generally ORD.E Page 482 of 751 consistent with King County averages, but could be improved to reduce the risk of students developing • chronic diseases as adults. Improving community health is an important issue for the City and one that can be aided by offering health and wellness programs by the City of Auburn Parks, Arts & Recreation Department. According to survey results,there is a higher interest level among residents for offering general fitness, health and wellness programs (64%) than outdoor sport leagues (51%) or indoor sport leagues (41%). The City of Auburn coordinates a 17-week Auburn International Farmers Market every Sunday from June through September. The season features over 40 vendors each week who offer a variety of fresh locally grown farm-based foods,flowers, hand crafted items and concession stands that feature home-cooked tastes. The weekly market also included free community performances and several educational sessions on health, nutrition, and gardening. The City of Auburn Parks, Arts & Recreation Department operates three community gardens for lease and use by residents. Community Gardens are used for recreational gardening and for growing vegetables and flowers for family use. The popularity of the gardens continues to grow and spots are sold out each year. Health and wellness activities and services are a major focus for senior programs. A variety of health agencies provides periodic health assessments, foot care, flu shots, blood pressure clinics, therapeutic massage, dental cleaning and medical information and referrals specifically for seniors at the Auburn Senior Activity Center. An onsite weekday lunch program is operated and managed in partnership with Catholic Community Services and Aging and Disability Services. All meals meet one-third recommended • daily allowance for persons 60 years of age and older. A salad bar is added to the meal provided by funds and product from the City of Auburn Human Services, sponsorships and participant donations.The Senior Activity Center also partners with Senior Services of Seattle King County to provide frozen Meals on Wheels to homebound seniors unable to prepare their own meals. Volunteers work with staff to ad mister the program and delivery of meals on a weekly basis. A variety of nutrition education materials and lectures are routinely provided at the Center and a volunteer"Wellness Team" assists staff in coordinating projects and activities specifically related to health and wellness for seniors. Center volunteers also work to provide a monthly food pantry for which groceries are purchased in bulk, re- packaged by volunteers and the savings are passed on to customers. Health &Wellness— Needs & Recommendations: 1. Expand Offerings for Health and Wellness Programs: a. Neighborhood Based Programs-Provide health and wellness programs that are both traditional and innovative. Examples: Neighborhood free program sites, bring recreation to the community. Examples: Park Spotlight Series offering different activities while introducing the community to active recreation in their own local parks. b. Community Center Based Programs- Provide multigenerational fitness classes • ORD.E Page 483 of 751 2. Healthy Cooking—Provide classes and demonstrations that reflect the diversity of our community. 3. Farmers Market—Ensure access to healthy, fresh foods from local farms. 4. Expand Outdoor Fitness Equipment Options in Parks 5. Expand Community Gardens with an emphasis on low income neighborhoods 6. Expand Outdoor Recreation opportunities. 7. Partner with local health agencies to be a provider of preventive care and rehabilitation ORD.E Page 484 of 751 • Heritage and Preservation Programs The City of Auburn has several sites designated as historic City Landmarks:the 1924 Auburn Masonic Temple at 302-310 E. Main Street;the 1937Auburn Post at 20 Auburn Avenue NE; the 1914 Auburn Public Library at 306 Auburn Avenue NE; and the 1879 Mary Olson Farm at 28728 Green River Road. Preservation efforts and identifying historic sites in need of landmark status can be strengthened by communication between the Museum and the Planning Department. By partnering between these City departments and staff, and by including key community groups a stronger heritage and cultural community can be built. The Museum can become a strong partner in helping establish landmark status for appropriate City properties, identifying and prioritizing preservation activities, and locating grant resources. Mary Olson Farm: A Unique Landmark In 1994 the City acquired the historic Mary Olson Farm which is recognized as a King County and City of Auburn Landmark and is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.The Mary Olson Farm dates from the 1880s, and vividly portrays a working farm of the early 1900s. The 67 acre farm includes seven historic wooden buildings, a salmon bearing stream, a 100+year old orchard, forested hillsides not logged since the late 1800s, and acres of meadows in hay production. After years of restoration efforts and an over two million dollar fund raising effort, the Farm opened to the public in 2011. Now fully restored, the Mary Olson Farm is operated as a limited use City Park— • cooperatively managed by the City of Auburn and the White River Valley Historical Society. In 2011 the Farm won the prestigious Historic Seattle's Best Preservation Award. In 2013 the Farm was named King Conservation Wildlife Protection Farm of the Year. To date roughly 18,000 school children have toured the Farm on curriculum based fieldtrips where they learn where their food comes from and about stream ecology. The site offers opportunities for living history programs, the study of nature and the environment, arts performances, classes, and passive recreation. A caretaker is located on site, helping to maintain the landscape and care for the resident livestock. Mary Olson Farm Operations The built environment of the Mary Olson Farm is leased to the White River Valley Historical Society for the purpose of economic restoration of the buildings and landscape, and for programing purposes.The City of Auburn still maintains ownership and the Farm operates as a City of Auburn Park. Programming at the Farm includes elementary school tours where students study where their food comes from.They visit stations and participate in hands-on activities such as digging up potatoes, making cider, feeding chickens and petting a cow. Later in the fall busloads of middle school students visit the Farm where they study stream ecology and salmon. Their visits are timed to coincide with the indigenous runs of salmon spawning in Olson Stream. ORD.E Page 485 of 751 During the summer months the Farm is open for drop-in visits for picnics and walks. A staff person and the caretaker are on hand to give tours, bring the livestock out to visit the public and maintain the Farm. Several special events have become a tradition. Hops & Crops Music and Beer Festival occurs each September drawing over 900 visitors to sample craft brews and listen to regional musicians. Each year the Auburn Symphony Orchestra uses the site for a series of chamber music concerts. Summer camps keep many young people active and learning while experiencing old time games,food making, livestock care and interacting with the environment. Recommendations for the Mary Olson Farm 1. Acquiring Conservation Use of Adjacent Properties: it will be beneficial to secure use or ownership of portions of several residential properties bordering the eastern boundary of the Farm. These properties are steep hillsides, include the ravine through which Olson Stream flows and are important view-shed areas key to program development and habitat restoration. 2. Continuing Habitat Restoration: Continued restoration of the natural habitat of the Farm is essential. Several work parties or contracted efforts each year are required to keep blackberry and ivy from infiltrating these 67 acres. Annual handwork should be scheduled to continue caring for the stream buffer area, keeping it free of invasive species and planting diverse native shrubs and trees. 3. Increasing Maintenance Budget for Historic Site& Buildings: The seven historic buildings, gravel walkways, historic orchard and many other unique qualities of the Farm require sensitive and ongoing maintenance. Cedar shake roofs need gentle cleaning every few years, gravel needs to be hand spread in walkways, and a certified orchardist needs to prune the fruit trees two times a year... There are many tasks of this nature at the Farm that are far beyond routine parks maintenance and need to be budgeted for accordingly. 4. Staffing: Should expansion of programs and event are to occur at the Mary Olson Farm it has to be recognized that additional staffing would be necessary to meet these needs.As educational programs and events increase,the staff hours to meet this need will need to be increased. Consideration should be given to increasing the current arrangement of providing the "Caretakers", "free rent" with one where the "caretaker"would also receive a monetary stipend as well. White River Valley Museum ORD.E Page 486 of 751 The White River Valley Museum is governed by a private/public partnership agreement between the White River Valley Historical Society and the City of Auburn. This partnership is the result of an extensive planning period (1990-1992) between the City and the Historical Society.The City of Auburn provides the salary for a fulltime Museum Director, a fulltime Curator of Education a .75 FTE Education Assistant and a .5 FTE Curator of Collections, In addition the City of Auburn provides some financial programming support as well as in-kind services such as printing and mailings. The Museum serves as a community educational institution teaching children and adults about the arts and heritage of the White River Valley. In addition to exhibits,the facility houses an extensive research archive, and manages the caretaking of thousands of precious artifacts which represent the history of Auburn. The Board of Directors is the governing body of the Museum.The 17 member board consists of eight members appointed by the City of Auburn and nine members elected by the Historical Society. Over the course of this partnership the Museum has experienced tremendous growth. Using privately raised funds the building has been fully renovated to accommodate professional permanent exhibits, a rotating exhibit gallery, gift shop and extensive collections storage space. Three temporary exhibits a year are created onsite and draw critical acclaim from members of the profession, arts critics and patrons alike. Complementing lectures, workshops and films are offered throughout the year. Creative programs are filled by a following audience that enjoys children's Overnight at the Museum,Junior Curator Camp, Hooked on History open houses and Late Play Dates. Each spring several thousand • elementary age students tour the Museum on curriculum based fieldtrips. In the future the Museum may undergo some facility and program changes to better connect it to the energy of the Park and the neighboring facilities. Recommendations for the Museum 1. Accommodating Continued Growth of Educational Programs: Museum programs are growing to meet the needs of the Auburn community and Auburn School District. All kindergarten and third grade Auburn School District students tour the Museum as part of their curriculum—an arrangement that is very rare in the State. Fieldtrip programs require a lot of staff and volunteer time. School programs are so strong that they will soon outstrip our ability and space. To that end fieldtrips will be streamlined, and grow into activities that do not require so many or such highly trained volunteers. Museum operations will need to depend more upon online registration and feedback. Consideration should be given to renovating the garage space into a classroom. Upon completion of this renovation, the Museum staff would be able to handle larger groups of students at one time. 2. Increasing Visibility:The most difficult aspect of successful operation of the White River Valley Museum has always been its lack of visibility. After years of working on this problem and successfully obtaining good signage, advertising and branding,the next step is to improve the exterior of the Museum to better attract visitors who are already at the park, library,senior • ORD.E Page 487 of 751 center,gym and the new community center. Consideration of rebuilding the Museum lobby, increasing signage and walkways, and developing the garage space into a classroom should be considered as methods to increase visibility. The Museum must also be an intragal part of the rebranding of Les Gove Park as part of the "Les Gove Park Master Plan" many items in the plan such as an outdoor plaza that could also serve as a gathering place for education and performance,the extension of"H Street" as well as the redevelopment of the shared City of Auburn and King County Library parking area can greatly benefit the Museum. 3. Staffing:After 2008 reductions in staff the Collections department at the Museum was decreased by 10 hours per week. This reduction remains in place today. . It is recommended that additional staff hours be allocated to the Curator of Collections position so that the professional,timely maintenance of the artifact collection remain. ORD.E Page 488 of 751 Cultural Programs: Arts and Events A wide range of arts programming and major city-wide special events are offered through the Arts and Events division within the Parks, Arts and Recreation Department. The main program areas include: Special Events, Performing Art,Visual Art, Public and Community Art and Literary Arts. Special events and arts programming typically rate high in public opinion surveys, both City-wide surveys and individual Department surveys. For the most recent Parks& Recreation Open Space Survey, when respondents were asked what recreation programs should be offered in Auburn (either by the City or by others)that members of their household would utilize, over 77%would participate in festivals or events (combining high and moderate likelihood of use -Question #11). Similarly 51%would participate in performing arts (dance, music, theater, etc) and 43% in visual arts programming. The Arts& Events division seeks to foster cultural growth and enrichment within the community while sponsoring programs representative of the arts spectrum and provide special events and programs that help create community. In recognition that the arts and event contribute enormously to Auburn's quality of life and foster economic growth, the division strives for excellence, diversity, and vitality in its programming, while broadening the availability and appreciation of the arts. The City of Auburn also supports an Arts Commission,founded in 1985. The commission is made up of 12 members from the community, appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. The commission meets on a monthly basis and is provided a report from staff, and also meets to make recommendations on the Arts Granting program (regranting via 4Culture Sustained Support Funding) as 411 well as selections on Public and Visual Arts displays and commissions. Special Events:The department has had a long history of hosting large-scale community events. Connecting these events to the overall mission and vision of the City and the department is vital. Auburn's community events range in size,theme, and audience. Large-scale community events regularly see over 15,000 individuals in attendance at a single event and have been repeatedly recognized in citizen surveys as very important to the quality of life in Auburn. Current community-wide special events include Petpalooza, KidsDay, 4th of July Festival, Veterans Day Parade and Santa Parade. Auburn also hosts a variety of special events annually that are coordinated by outside entities. Each event serves a unique role and adds to the spirit of our City.These community festivals, athletic, and cultural events provide opportunities for neighbors, artists, merchants, spectators, and participants to interact and celebrate the richness of Auburn.A new special event ordinance and permitting process was established in 2015 to streamline the event permitting process for outside agencies to coordinate and produce events within the City of Auburn. It impacts those events that impact the ordinary use of public streets, right-of-ways,trails, parks or sidewalks and/or may require additional city services than would normally be provided such as police escorts,traffic control, sanitation, and cleanup work required to support the event. Program Needs/Recommendations 1. Continue to streamline the special event permit process to support community groups presenting their own events without impacting city staff, city equipment and city services. ORD.E Page 489 of 751 2. Further staff collaboration and coordination of events to support outreach and promotion of other city services and programs. 3. In order to grow special events or add new events, staffing would need to increase.Current levels of staffing are at maximum capacity to execute and coordinate existing events. Performing Arts: Performing Arts is a highly visible and central program to the Arts and Events division. Offering a wide range of programming,the performing arts spans from free summer concerts, professional ticketed performances at the Auburn Performing Arts Center, and managing all aspects of the Auburn Avenue Theater. Program Needs/Recommendations 1. A full facility assessment of the Auburn Avenue Theater needs to be conducted, as the City is in year 7 of a 15 year lease of the building and a plan will need to be created in order to dictate next steps for the Theater and/or performing arts offerings. 2. The ability to offer concessions is an important factor in the patrons experience at ticketed performing arts opportunities. A reliable method of working with community non-profit agencies to secure the appropriate permits needs to be further explored and systematized. The creation of a Parks Foundation non-profit agency could potentially serve this need. 3. The largest growth program area has been in the production of plays and musical, in the Auburn Community Players as well as the youth and teen theater productions.These programs are incredibly space intensive and the growth/continuation needs to take into consideration additional facility space for practice, set-building, and being able to continue to offer rentals and programming while the cast is rehearsing. 4. While the Auburn Avenue Theater is leased, it is under the City's management.The outside of the building needs to reflect and represent the quality of entertainment that is occurring within. A facade improvement is needed to improve the street appearance of the building. 5. The Auburn Avenue Theater is also a great community resource, providing a venue for which community groups can rent and use for their events, presentations, conferences, etc. Streamlining the rental process would increase exposure to the theater as well as bring in additional revenues. 6. Continue to gather information and audience needs and have it input into the programming decisions that are made and what kinds of programming is offered. Visual Art:The city curates two visual art galleries, on in the lobby of Auburn's City Hall and one in Auburn's Senior Center. Local and regional artists apply once a year for the display of their artwork within these spaces. The artists display their artwork for exposure and do not receive an honorarium for their time and effort. The City creates a flyer and promotional materials to be able to support the artists. Program Needs/Recommendations 1. Research and explore offering an honorarium/fee to participating artists. Many municipal art programs are beginning to offer this as a way to support artists and the costs associated with displaying artwork (travel,framing needs, etc.) 2. Staff receives regular requests for artwork to be placed in offices and public areas. A potential new portable works program should be explored. This would involve the purchase of two dimensional artwork within through our Public Art selection process, and be potentially connected to a purchase award from the artists that participate in the gallery program. ORD.E Page 490 of 751 • Public and Community Art:The Public Art program was created in 1988 includes commissioned artwork and sculptures that have been created and placed in the public domain, outside and accessible to all. The Public Art collection includes over 25 artworks and is throughout the City mainly in public parks. The Public Art program is financially supported by a 1%for art program, in which 1%of City Capital Project Construction goes to the creation of a new artwork. Additionally, an annual $30,000 is allotted for the creation of new work. Community Art are projects that include community participation with the creation of public art, including temporary artwork displays, group-painted murals, and other projects such as utility boxes. Pianos on Parade, Benchmarks, Streetscapes (artwork within vacant storefronts) are examples of Auburn's Community Art programs. Program Needs/Recommendations 1. The current iteration of the percent for art resolution was last revised in 2008. It is recommended that the language of the resolution is discussed with Mayor and Council specifically the language that excludes streets and utility projects from the requirement. 2. Maintenance and restoration of this aging collection is an increasing need, and restoration work regularly exceeds the annual budget allotment. The public art collection has annual maintenance program to ensure the longevity of the artwork, but exploration of a reliable funding source in which more comprehensive restoration could be completed is needed. The City maintains an insurance policy in which the artwork is covered in case of vandalism/theft with a deductible of$5,000. 3. Providing a method for which private developers are encouraged and incentivized to include public art within new or renovated construction projects could be a great benefit to the public spaces and built environments that are changing rapidly. An exploration of collaboration • between Planning and Arts division to be able to advise new developments as well as have the process be responsive to timeline as well as a review process through the Arts Commission. 4. Downtown Sculpture Gallery is an artwork on loan program that places sculptures on City built pedestals for a one-year timeframe. The continuation of building new pedestals with new downtown core developments is recommended and will ensure the vibrancy of the program and have artwork throughout the downtown core. 5. The space needs for Pianos on Parade and Benchmarks is significant, and the materials are stored for the majority of the year. 6. The community participation of these types of programs makes the use of social media ideal for continued community participation. Working with the City's marketing director, create marketing plans that include social media contests, hashtags and tagging as part of the signage to increase exposure and online participation. Literary Arts: In 2011 the position of Poet Laureate was established to recognize and honor a citizen poet of exceptional talent and accomplishment.The Poet Laureate also encourages appreciation of poetry and literary life in Auburn.The position is a three-year term and works with staff to offer programming and events throughout their term. Program Needs/Recommendations 1. Expand Literary Arts opportunities in Auburn; including book readings, poetry readings, and writing classes. S ORD.E Page 491 of 751 ORD.E Page 492 of 751 • Chapter 7 : Open Space Defines a • Community Chapter 7 Open Space Introduction Communities use the term "open space" differently as the natural and built environments differ so widely from place to place. In Auburn we define open space as land largely undeveloped, which has been left in a natural, near natural or natural appearing condition. Open space includes both public and privately owned land. The Growth Management Act of 1991 (GMA) recommends that cities and counties develop park and recreation elements which complement the expected land development pattern of the community (RCW 36.70A.070(8)). The GMA also requires us to "identify open space corridors within and between urban growth areas. They shall include lands useful for recreation, wildlife habitat, trails, and connection of critical areas." (RCW 36.70A.160). This plan is intended to meet the requirements of the GMA, and to ensure that green spaces in Auburn are preserved to the maximum extent possible. Why We Need Open Space The majority of the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan is devoted to determining how we can best serve our human constituents. The Open Space component of the Plan is different, however. In addition to benefiting people, open space is valuable to wildlife and to maintaining environmental quality. The preservation of green spaces and natural areas are important in protecting the quality of life for Auburn residents within a highly urbanized area. Open space benefits are many and diverse. In addition to environmental advantages, open space provides psychological relief and opportunity for solitude that people need on occasion. Open space can: • Provide physical and visual buffers between urban and rural areas, and between incompatible uses. • Provide opportunities for passive and active outdoor recreation. • Preserve natural areas and environmental features with significant educational, scientific, wildlife habitat, historic, and/or scenic values such as views of major visual resources i.e., as Mount Rainier, riparian corridors, and vistas along scenic routes. • Provide public access to creeks, rivers and other water bodies. • Create distinctive settings within the city or within a neighborhood by preserving features such as hillsides, rivers, wetlands, scenic corridors and potential trail corridors. • Provide connections between developed areas and natural areas. Provide movement corridors suitable for wildlife. • Offer health and safety benefits such as flood control, protection for water supply, cleansing of air, and separation from hazards such as landslides. ORD.E Page 494 of 751 • Goals and Policy The goals and objectives of the Open Space Plan are focused on developing a high quality, diversified park and open space system that preserves and enhances significant environmental resources and features. Goal 1 To acquire and manage important open spaces in the City of Auburn. Objective 1.1 Coordinate planning efforts to create a system of open spaces,an acquisition and conservation strategy,a management and maintenance program,public art and an education component. Objective 1.2 Pursue acquisition and conservation of critical open space lands. Acquisition of open space should be consistent with the site selection criteria and conservation priorities adopted with the Park, Recreation and Open Space Plan. Goal 2 To develop a Greenbelt Open Space System with an interconnecting network of open 4111 space land allowing movement of people and wildlife. Objective 2.1 Develop a system of trail corridors to link major parks and open spaces, residential neighborhoods, and other activity centers such as schools, employment centers, and community centers. Objective 2.2 Explore the use of utility and transportation corridors to expand the trail system. Goal 3 A funding mechanism should be established so that open space can be acquired on a regular basis. Objective 3.1 Open space proposed for acquisition with public funds should be evaluated and prioritized based on such factors as environmental sensitivity and connections to other open space areas around the City and beyond. I ORD.E Page 495 of 751 Objective 3.2 The City seeks to acquire less-than-fee interest (i.e. Conservation Easements) in lands which can provide open space benefits compatible with reasonable private uses of the remaining ownership interest. Policy 3.2.1 The City pursues agreements for public use of utility rights-of-way for public trails as connectors between open space parcels. Policy 3.2.2 The City should approve use of public trail rights-of-way for underground utilities, or crossing of rights-of-way, in exchange for public use of utility rights-of-way or in return for fees dedicated to open space acquisition, maintenance or operation. Policy 3.2.3 The City participates with other government agencies or land trusts in joint acquisition or land trades of regionally important open space lands. Policy 3.2.4 The City devises methods for efficient and equitable exchanges between land owning divisions of City government to achieve open space goals. Policy 3.2.5 Conservation easements along river and stream corridors throughout the City are always being considered. The program seeks continuous easements across property boundaries along these corridors. A System of Open Spaces To maximize the benefit of open space lands, Auburn seeks a meaningful system of open space. An open space system that best serves the needs of people consists of a series of activity centers, interconnected by open space corridors. Because the central portion of Auburn is already largely developed, it will be difficult to develop a connected open space system in this location.Therefore,the care and preservation of individual green spaces such as parks and school grounds becomes very important. The function of public lands as neighborhood open space should be carefully analyzed before any changes in use or ownership are considered. ORD.E Page 496 of 751 • 13 LANK • PA G E • ORD.E Page 497 of 751 Chapter 8 : Auburn Trails • Chapter 8 Auburn Trails Trails are a popular attraction throughout the Pacific Northwest. Our mild climate and love of outdoor activities contribute to strong support and use of trails, particularly in urbanized areas. What IS a Trail? A trail is a travel way intended for pedestrians and other users that excludes motorized traffic. It can be paved, and designed to support bicyclists, rollerbladers,joggers and other users who require a hard surface. Or be unpaved, to serve walkers, hikers, mountain bikers, and equestrians. This plan will look at trails from three different viewpoints. First, are purely recreational trails; second, are trails serving both recreational and transportation needs; and third, are low impact trails within natural preserves. This differentiation is useful in determining the location, type, and quantity of additional trails needed in the City of Auburn. For this plan, there are three types of trails described as recreational loop trails, linear trails and recreation/transportation trails. Table 8-1 illustrates the existing trails present in Auburn. III 1. Recreational Loop Trails Short recreational trails, which are contained within a single park or site, are usually in the form of a loop. They are intended for walking, bicycling, hiking, or skating. They may connect different activity areas within a park, provide access to natural preserves, and sometimes provide a connection to the immediate neighborhood. Trails may be made of a hard surfaced material such as concrete or asphalt, or a "soft" surfaced material such as dirt, crushed stone or bark chips. The advantage of hard surfaced paths is they can accommodate more types of users, while soft surfaced paths have a more rustic, natural feeling. Hard surface trails are also usable in all weather conditions. • ORD.E Page 499 of 751 Table 8-1 Existing and Future Trails in Auburn Trails Loop Transport- Inside Linear Total ation Total (miles) Park Park/Trail Description (miles) (miles) Miles A'Street SE Trail Future trail Auburndale Park Paved loop path around park 0.41 0 BPA Trails(Future) Paths to be developed in the future 0 Paved loop path around Park to Green River levee. Soft surface trail Brannan Park extends along the levee. 1.19 1.00 2.19 C Street SE Trail Ellington Rd.SW to 15th Street SW 1.60 1.60 Paved loop path through park and Cameron Park loops through.Lemon Tree Lane 0.33 0.33 Cedar Lanes Park Informal path through wooded area 0.25 0.25 Dogwood South Future trail Fulmer Park(Future) Loop path to be developed 0 Paved loop path around meadow, play structure, ball fields. Extensive Game Farm Park sidewalk throughout park 2.30 1.00 3.3 Paved trail along the White River Game Farm Wilderness Park* and around the group camp area. 1.25 1.00 1 Green River Trail(Future) Paved trail along the Green River 0 Paved 12'wide trail runs alongside the Union Pacific railroad, from the Interurban Trail city's northern to southern limits 4.5 4.5 Paved loop through wood and along Isaac Evans Park the Green River 1.07 1.07 Paved loop through wood and Jornada Park around park 0.10 0.1 Extensive sidewalk path on Lakeland Hills Way from Evergreen Way to Lake Lakeland Hills Linear Tapps Parkway 0.73 0.73 Paved loop path around recreational Lakeland Hills Park Trail fields 0.39 0 39 Lake Tapps Blvd.Trail .Paved sidewalk and asphalt trail 1.62 1.62 Les Gove Park Trail Paved loop path around open space 0.50 0.5 Mill Creek Corridor/Auburn Environmental Park Board Walk Trail Paved loop path around pond. Mill Pond Park Trail Connects to Lakeland Hills Trail. 0.29 0.29 Both hard and soft surface trails are present in the park. A paved loop Roegner Park* path is marked. _ 1.29 1.00 1 Rotary Park (Future) Loop path to be developed ORD.E Page 500 of 751 0Loop Inside Transport- Linear Total ation Total Park/Trail Description Park (miles) (miles) (miles) Miles Shaughnessy Park(Future) Loop path to be developed Sunset Park Paved loop path around park. 0.69 0.50 1.19 White River Trail* Paved and soft surface trail 0.86 4.5" 4.5 Williams Trail Future trail Total 26.39 miles 9.93 839 4.50 Refer to 2005 Transportation Plan I • S ORD.E Page 501 of 751 2. Linear Trails Recreational trails designed to connect one area of the city or activity center to another. They lead to a destination point and are hard surfaced so they are usable in most weather conditions and for a variety of activities, such as walking, bicycling, and skating. 3. Recreation/Transportation Trails Trails designed to connect one area of the city or activity center to another serve a dual role for both recreational and transportation uses. Recreation/ transportation trails are generally linear in layout, lead to a destination point, and are hard surfaced so they are usable in most weather conditions and for a variety of transportation modes, such as walking, bicycling, and skating. Sometimes called "multi- modal trails", they are designed and constructed to stricter standards than the loop paths, and normally accommodate two-way traffic. Current Recreation/Transportation Trails • Interurban • Lakeland • White River The White River Trail that stretches from Game Farm Wilderness Park to through Roegner Park and ends at A Street SE includes soft surfaced trail sections alongside the paved trail where possible. This enables riders on mountain bikes, horseback, hikers or others who need the extra traction to use these same trail corridors. Future trail connection with the Interurban trail is desired to connect the southern portion of the City to a regional trail system. Interurban Trail - This 12' wide trail is located in the Puget Power right-of- way and parallels the Union Pacific Railroad for much of its length. The Interurban Trail currently runs north to south through Tukwila, Kent, Auburn, Algona and Pacific, and is approximately 17 miles long. The trail is the primary north and south route suitable for non: motorized travel between valley communities. The trail's location through the heart of Auburn's industrial district brings potential users close to several of the largest employers in the city. Boeing, GSA, the Outlet Collection, and the Auburn Environmental Park are also located adjacent to the trail;downtown Auburn is less than 1/2 mile from the trail. The Interurban Trail and the White River Trail are also designed for use by equestrians. Informal trails in the open space areas of southeast Auburn are also used. The shoulders of some of the rural roads are ORD.E Page 502 of 751 0 used by equestrians, although these are not designed or managed for this particular use. Lakeland Hills Trail - This trail connects the growing Lakeland development with Mill Pond and Oravetz Road. It is unique in Auburn because it passes directly through a residential neighborhood. As Lakeland continues to grow, the trail will extend to ensure all neighborhood residents have easy access. Future connections will allow residents to travel from Oravetz Road to Lake Tapps Boulevard and Sunset Park. Due to steep grades and narrow width, the trail is most appropriate for pedestrian use only. With the completion of Roegner Park and Auburn Riverside High School, the Lakeland Hills trail has seen a dramatic increase in use. White River Trail - The trail, within Roegner Park, falls into both therecreational loop path and recreation/ transportation trail categories. The trail extends east along the White River to Game Farm Wilderness Park. The future extension of the trail expects to increase its usefulness as a transportation way. It will provide a much-needed east/west connector in the south part of Auburn for cyclists and equestrians. The proposed trail 0 extends west to A Street SE, and appropriate provisions will be made for cyclists on A Street and Kersey Way, this will prove to be a very valuable link in our non-motorized network and a connection to the local schools in the area. Do We Need More Trails? Determining the need for trails is more complex than it is for other recreational facilities because of the large area they can cover and the many different trail uses. This plan will look at survey responses from City residents to evaluate the current demand for recreational loop paths. Recreation/transportation trails are discussed briefly, but by necessity, are more fully analyzed in the City of Auburn Transportation Plan under the non-motorized trail section. Survey Results The public opinion survey reveals that Auburn residents have a strong interest in trail related activities. The survey asked several questions concerning residents current use,what kind of trails they would most like to see developed, what recreation activities they participate in now, and what activities they would participate in if facilities were available. These questions were primarily oriented toward recreational trail use. • ORD.E Page 503 of 751 Sixty-one percent of Auburn households indicated that there was a need for walking and biking trails. Forty percent of Auburn households also wanted non-paved trails and biking trails. The survey respondents indicated that the residents were willing to spend $13 for every $100 to improve/expand walking& biking trails and non-motorized vehicle trails. ORD.E Page 504 of 751 Current Participation in All Recreation Activities: 0 Activities that can be performed on trails constitute four of the top 25 activities that Auburn residents participate in. See Table 8-2. Please note the survey activities ranked first and second are running/ walking and visiting nature areas, which are activities usually conducted outdoors. Walking for pleasure is therefore the most popular outdoor activity in the City. Future Participation: When asked what activities they would participate in if facilities were available, respondents indicated running or walking and visiting nature areas/wildlife were their number one and two choices. The popularity of running and walking ranked number one and two in the survey conducted for the previous park update in 2005. The category bicycling on paved surfaces was ranked third. Current Trail Use: More than 59% of respondents indicated that trails raked highest in priority when considering recreation activities. Need for Trails: 4. More than half of the respondents indicated that additional paved trails for biking, walking and other activities are needed. Conclusions from the Survey Survey results support the conclusion demand for additional trails is high. The existing trails do not provide complete coverage for the City, whether for recreation or transportation uses. The fourteen recreational loop paths occur in scattered locations, but with the exception of Les Gove Park, the central portion of the city is not well- served. Because this is also the most developed part of the city, it will be difficult to add trails in this area. The Parks Department will work with the Planning Department to add trail connectors as new developments are proposed, especially along the Green and White Rivers. Current Trail Efforts Constructing new recreational loop paths in existing and future parks is a viable and reasonable way of meeting some of the demand for additional walking/biking/skating facilities. Parks and other City- owned properties that could accommodate new loop paths are: • ORD.E Page 505 of 751 Current • Auburndale Park • Brannan Park • Cameron Park • Cedar Lanes Park • Game Farm Park • Game Farm Wilderness Park • Cedar Lanes Park • Isaac Evans Park • Lakeland Hill Park Park • Les Gave Park • Mill Pond Park • Roegner Park • Sunset Park Future • BPA trails (Lea Hill to Green River Road) • Fulmer Park • Rotary Park • Green River Trail • Shaughnessy Park • West Hill Watershed • Extension of Lakeland Linear Trail Opportunities for trails are explored in all new park design and construction. Gaines Park, Cedar Lanes Park and Lakeland Hills Parks, both small neighborhood parks, each have a short loop path of approximately 1/4 mile. Roegner Park, Game Farm Wilderness Park, and the White River Trail includes two parallel trails that include a soft surfaced path suitable for hikers, mountain bikers and equestrians through part of the site, and a paved trail that extends the entire length of the park site. The trail continues east, connecting with the trail in Game Farm Wilderness Park, and west to A Street SW, establishing this trail as an important east/west route for non-motorized traffic. Further connections to neighboring residential areas to the south via sidewalks and the Lakeland Hills Trail will increase the usability of the White River Trail for students and other users. A master site plan is currently being developed for the Future Green River Trail. The trail is a project partly financed by the King County Open Space Bond funding. This two phase trail is planned to follow the alignment of the Green River from Seattle to Auburn Narrows. In Auburn it follows the west side of the river from the City's northern boundary to Brannan Park, where it crosses the river into Isaac Evans Park. The trail runs along the east side of the river, just outside of the existing Auburn city limits, crossing ORD.E Page 506 of 751 back to the west side at the Fenster/Green River Access, a new open space IDsite. The Green River Trail will be a significant new resource for local residents. A longer term goal is to access the BPA power line and the Williams pipe line • • ORD.E Page 507 of 751 to extend the trail up into Lakeland Hills area and back down to the Valley. Like the Interurban, the Green River Trail will run in a north/south direction through Auburn. One or more connections between the two trails is desirable to provide safe and convenient access in an east/west direction across the valley. Small pocket parks or rest areas with picnic tables and benches are proposed along the trail. One planned connection is along the extension of S. 277th Street, where a paved trail for access from Auburn Way North to West Valley Highway. A second east-west trail from the Green River Trail to I St. should be located between 37th and 40th Street NE. The City of Auburn is comprised of 6 general districts (Lea Hill, West Hill, Lakeland Hills, North Auburn, South Auburn, and Southeast Auburn. Additionally, the Downtown Urban Center is a sort of subdistrict where North Auburn and South Auburn meet and that demands its own approach for trails. Within each district there is a different level of emphasis that has been placed on trail development over the years. Trails were incorporated into Lakeland Hills from its inception. North Auburn, South Auburn, and Southeast Auburn have been located within Auburn city limits for many decades which has allowed the City to acquire, plan, and develop a number of parks and trails. Lea Hill and West Hill were incorporated in 2008 which means that these areas are light in their inventory of parks and trail assets. Each area deserves its own inventory, needs assessment and strategic approach to the development of parks and trails. Additionally, each district lacks non- motorized connectivity between districts. Trail Goals and Objectives The City and region are committed to exploring transportation alternatives to the personal automobile. Walking and bicycling are two options, which are low-cost, energy-efficient and non-polluting. Trails are a means to encourage these alternative transportation methods, while improving accessibility between residential neighborhood and jobs, shopping, schools, parks and other public facilities. The goal to create a pedestrian and bicycle network of trails was first introduced as Goal 7 in Chapter 4, Goals and Policies. This chapter expands those goals and objectives with more detailed policy statements. ORD.E Page 508 of 751 • GoaI7 To create a pedestrian and bicycle network of trails. Trails are most useful if they are easily reached by large numbers of people. Like streets, they should be connectors between places people want to go. Because of the variety of possible destinations, a network of trails is desirable. Trail Network and Planning Objective 7.1 A network of trails should be developed which provides adequate coverage for the entire city, and which provides connections to between districts within the City and to surrounding communities. Policy 7.1.1 A grid of interconnecting trails running both north/south and east/west should be designed and developed. Consideration is given to creating safe trails to enable bicyclists, adults, children, and other specialized users to move "seamlessly" across trails and to their destination. Policy 7.1.2 The City should seek opportunities to create trail connections with surrounding communities. The City continues to participate in development of countywide and regional trail systems,such as the Interurban and Green River Trails. Connection opportunities already exist on the north side of the City with Kent and the south side of the City with Sumner. Connecting Auburn's trails in these two areas is a high priority. Additional opportunities should be explored for the west side of the City with Federal Way and the east side of the City with Kent and Covington. Transportation Plan Policy 7.1.3 The trail portions of the Park Plan and the Non- motorized transportation element of the Transportation Plan are coordinated and rules of the road enforcement should be addressed. Policy 7.1.4 Potential conflicts between trail users and adjacent landowners are minimized by involving all parties during the planning and design process. Policy 7.1.5 Non-motorized transportation corridors should be identified as a means of connecting Lea Hill, West Hill, Lakeland Hills and Southeast Auburn with Downtown Auburn. It is likely • that these non-motorized connections will need to be separated ORD.E Page 509 of 751 from the high volume vehicular corridors that currently exist along Auburn Way South, Peasly Canyon Road, A Street SE, SE 312`h Street and SE 304th Street. These corridors should be developed in order to promote the economic opportunities of downtown Auburn as well as to provide greater opportunity for use of transit and train services located in downtown Auburn. Trail Design Objective 7.2 Trail design and layout take advantage of unique natural settings, and provide safe and efficient settings for all users. Discussion: An ideal trail is designed to be easily and quickly reached from any point in a neighborhood, and to directly link "nodes" of activity, such as schools, parks, commercial centers, and transit centers. Less opportunity exists to place trails in existing neighborhoods than in new neighborhoods, although when opportunities arise, these should also be explored. Sidewalks, trails and streets will form an overlapping network of transportation alternatives. In some settings trails and sidewalks may be redundant. Policy 7.2.1 Trails should be sited to connect new residential neighborhoods with surrounding public facilities, other trails, and activity centers. Policy 7.2.2 Trails are designed to provide a safe, pleasant, and high-quality experience. Trail design should be related to surrounding natural and man-made features. Where needed, space adjacent to the trail is designed to provide a buffer between incompatible uses. Policy 7.2.3 Trail amenities shall be provided at trailheads and important activity centers. These include features such as restrooms or portable sanitary facilities, water fountains, kiosks, covered shelters, paved parking, benches, horse loading areas, art, environmental and historic interpretive signs, and directional signage. Policy 7.2.4 Trail layout minimizes at-grade street crossings. Policy 7.2.5 The most recent version of the AASHTO publication "Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities" is used to provide guidelines for paved trail design and construction. ADA guidelines for accessibility is followed when ORD.E Page 510 of 751 possible. For soft surfaced trails accommodating mountain bikers, equestrians, and hikers, when necessray developers of trails such as the Backcountry Horsemen or the U.S. Forest Service are consulted as needed. Objective 7.3 The City participates in planning for regional trails in South King County. Possibilities for new trail connections between neighboring communities are explored. Trail Connections to Public Transit Policy 7.3.1 The City seeks to have trails connect directly to transit centers, bus stops, and other sources of public transportation where possible. • • ORD.E Page 511 of 751 Discussion: By providing easy access to public transportation, intermodal travel may appeal to a larger number of people. Where transit centers are reached by foot or bike, the need for parking space may also be reduced. Where direct access to public transportation is not possible, signage and route markings are provided to the closest connections. Serve a Variety of Users Objective 7.4 A variety of trail types and lengths are constructed to meet the needs of different user groups. Discussion: Trails are used by all ages of people, who are engaged in many different activities. To meet these diverse demands, recreational loop paths in parks and neighborhoods are needed, as well as linear trails for both recreational and commuting use. Trail Recommendations Because of their magnitude, trail development is a long and involved process. Planning of trail projects usually occurs far in advance of their actual construction. This section identifies potential trails deserving of further research and planning, or have already undergone a certain amount of planning or design. Some of these trails can serve as part of the transportation network and are also included in Auburn's Transportation Plan. It is important we take an aggressive approach to securing easements in locations where active development could remove the opportunity for future trails. A prime example of this is the Tacoma-Covington powerline, where warehouse and parking lot development on the valley floor may eliminate the possibility of an important potential east/west trail between Auburn and Federal Way. ORD.E Page 512 of 751 • Potential Trails for Future Development 1. BPA Trail (Lea Hill) Location: Jacobsen Tree Farm Property to Isaac Evans Park Project Description: • Acquire land and private property easements for construction of a trail that will connect Lea Hill to the valley floor. The trail is anticipated to extend to and through the Auburn Golf Course where it will connect to the internal loop trail at Isaac Evans Park and use the Dykstra footbridge to gain access to the west side of the Green River. Schedule: TBD Cost: TBD Funding: Grant 3. A Street SE Trail Location: A Street from south City limits to downtown Project Description: • Work with City of Pacific to create a plan for crossing the White River bridge safely and getting to Auburn's south City limits • Class I trail from 41st St. SE to Cross Street • Pedestrian/Bicycle tunnel under SR 18 • Project is envisioned on BNSF ROW • Schedule: TBD Cost: $1,116,000 Funding: Mitigation for construction of intermodal freight yard 4. White River Trail Location: A Street SE to Interurban Trail Project Description: • Connect the western end of the White River Trail to the Interurban trail to improve connections and trail user circulation for residents in the southern portion of the City. An A Street underpass and crossing the White River create significant challenges for this project. Schedule: To be identified Cost: TBD Funding: Apply for grants 5. Green River Trail - North Auburn portion Location: Reddington Levee Trail near the Port Property to S. 277th St. Project Description: • Regional trail project from Seattle through Kent, and • ORD.E Page 513 of 751 ending at the Auburn Narrows. Through joint efforts by Auburn and King County, preliminary planning and design are completed for the North Auburn portion of the trail. City of Auburn will work with developer as developments are constructed along Green River. Schedule: TBD Cost: TBD Funding: King County and Grants 6. Mill Creek Corridor/Auburn Environmental Park Location: Along the Mill Creek, primarily north of SR 18 Project Description: • A Linear Park project would introduce residents to the unique setting and ecosystem along the Creek. Trail surface would probably be a soft surface, and development alongside would be minimal, concentrating on environmental education. Schedule: To be identified Cost: TBD Funding: Impact Fees,Wetland Mitigation 7. Southeast Trails (Williams Trail) Location: South of the Stuck (White) River, and east of Kersey Way Project Description: • Develop trails through open space in southeast Auburn, along utility corridors, where possible. Use existing trails created by equestrians in the area as a basis for developing a good network. Schedule: To be identified Cost: TBD Funding: Impact Fees/Grant 8. Future Trails identified in the Auburn Non-motorized Transportation Plan Schedule: To be identified Cost: TBD Funding: Impact Fees/Grant ORD.E Page 514 of 751 • 13 LA N K 0 PA G E • ORD.E Page 515 of 751 Chapter 9 : Getting It All Done • Chapter 9 Getting it All Done The previous chapters of this plan inventoried and analyzed the existing parks, open spaces, and recreation programs here in Auburn. The result is a series of recommendations to meet the needs of our present and future residents. Chapter 9 takes the recommendations from Chapters 3 through 8 and integrates them into a plan of action. Looking at all the needs together is useful for providing a "global" picture of our long-term vision. Following the action and implementation plan outlined in this chapter will accomplish that vision. This chapter is divided into three primary components: I. Meeting Park and Open Space Needs II. Meeting Recreation Facility and Program Needs III. Financing Future Capital Improvements This chapter will also provide a summary of the recommended actions, cost estimates for implementing these improvements, give an approximate time frame for completion, and 11110 indicate possible funding sources. I. Meeting Park and Open Space Needs Section I compiles the conclusions and recommendations from previous chapters and creates a program that, if followed, will keep Auburn on track to provide recreational sites for its constituents. The following four steps are necessary to ensure that we have sufficient parks and open spaces for all our residents, and future residents and that they are in optimal condition. Step 1: Maintain Existing Parks and Facilities Step 2: Renovate Existing Parks and Facilities Step 3: Acquire and Develop New Parks and Facilities Step 4: Acquire and Manage Open Space Table 9-1, provides a summary of identified actions to accomplish each of the steps above. The following pages and the Appendix provide more information about each of these action items. Step 1: Maintain Existing Parks and Facilities Survey respondents reported that maintaining our parks is of primary importance. Management and maintenance of parks is an on-going task that occurs in all parks. Those • ORD.E Page 517 of 751 locations, which are highly visible or heavily used, receive highest priority. As new parks are added to the system, maintenance requirements will also grow. In addition to appropriate staff increases, a new park maintenance facility may be needed to handle work in an efficient manner in the Lea Hill annexation area. Step 2: Improve Existing Parks and Facilities Auburn residents expressed, in the public survey and in public meetings, that upgrading existing parks and providing more beautification projects were high priorities. Renovation of parks should include measures to improve aesthetics, circulation, safety, accessibility to all persons, and to rehabilitate or replace recreation equipment and facilities/amenities. Highest priority is given to those parks that experience extremely high use or represent a particularly important resource. Parks with safety or accessibility issues will also receive high priority. The Appendix details improvement projects, their estimated costs, and proposed funding sources. Step 3:Acquire and Develop New Parks and Facilities With a growing population, and land still available for future growth, it is necessary to consider acquisition and development of parks to serve our future population. The standards recommended in Chapter 3 provide the basis for determining how much land and what facilities we need now, and what may be needed in the future. Step 4:Acquire and Manage Open Space The City owns several open space properties, some of which were recently acquired. Some of these acquisitions will receive minimal development suitable for a passive recreation experience. Land, that is environmentally sensitive or inaccessible, may not receive frequent visitors, but will still require stewardship to guarantee and monitor the health and conditions found in these locations. ORD.E Page 518 of 751 • TABLE 9-1 Summary of Identified Needs Park and Open Space Land and Facilities Step 1: Perform All parks shall receive regular maintenance to ensure that Regular they are SAFE, HEALTHY, ATTRACTIVE and CLEAN. Maintenance Step 2: Improve 1. Renovate all parks to meet ADA requirements as Existing Parks funding is acquired. and Facilities 2. Perform major renovations: Cameron, Cedar Lanes, Game Farm, Game Farm Park Wildernesss, Isaac Evans, Les Gove, Shaughnessy Park. Step 3: Acquire and Current Need: City owns the following properties. Develop New Develop to meet current needs: Green River Stormwater Parks Facility Park &Trail; Les Gove Park; Jacobsen Tree Farm, 104th 7 Street Property, Auburndale II, West Hill Lake Future Need: Develop by 2025: Consider acquiring and developing properties in the Lea Hill, West Hill, and southeastern portions of the City. Develop Current Need: 5 gymnasiums, 11 Softball and youth baseball • Recreation fields, 2 Soccer/football fields 2 Fields. Facilities Future Need: By 2025: 4 Softball/Youth Baseball fields, 8 football/soccer fields, 5 tennis courts, 12 gymnasiums Step 4: Manage Open Olson Canyon, Green River Access/Fenster Property, Space Lakeland Nature Area, Critical Areas, Other lands as identified Future parkland needs are summarized in Table 9-2. This table uses the standards in Chapter 3 to determine the number of additional acres that will be needed in ten years and fifteen years from now if our population continues to grow as expected. The purpose of each column of Table 9-2 is described below. Column 1: Park Type Three park categories—neighborhood, community and linear parks— are included in this table, indicating the "core" parks that make up the majority of our park system. These are parks largely devoted to active recreation or sports. Columns 2&3: 2015 Total Existing Acres/2015 Developed Acres 1111 ORD.E Page 519 of 751 These columns compare total acreage in each of the core park categories with the amount of land that is actually developed for recreational use. This information reveals that more than 80% of the land in these types of parks is already fully developed. Population Estimates Current Population 76,347 Year 2025 84,948 Year 2030 89,868 Column 4: 2004 Remaining Undeveloped Acres The remaining undeveloped acreage found in existing parks is available for development. In some instances, such as the neighborhood and linear parks, these are largely incidental spaces that need a small amount of landscaping or walkway to be complete. Our community parks contain some larger spaces that could accommodate additional recreational features or updating of facilities. Column 5: Park Standards—Developed Acres per 1000 Residents In Chapter 3 we recommended that a standard of 6.03 acres of parkland be acquired and developed per 1,000 residents. The goal of setting a standard is to ensure that the level and quality of parks remains the same as it is today, even if the population of our community increases. As noted in Chapter 3, these standards reflect the amount of developed acreage in our core park types: neighborhood, community and linear parks. Columns 6&7:Additional Acres Needed-2025 and 2030 The last two columns refer to the amount of developed park land needed in the future to meet the demands of a growing population. These figures are based on the standard shown in the previous column. Table 9-2 Future Park Acreage Needs Park Types 2015 (Total 2015 2015 Adopted Future Future Acres) (Dev'd (Undev'd Standard Need: 2025 Need: 2030 acres) Acres) (In developed (Est. Pop (Est. Pop acres/1,000 res.) 84,948) 89,868) Neighborhood Parks 67.84 67.84 58.74 1.32 44.29 50.97 Community Parks 267.81 267.81 223.75 4.5 158.48 180.63 Open Space Areas 386.89 N/A 386.89 As acquired N/A N/A Trails/Linear Parks 26.39 26.39 Miles N/A 0.21 0 0 ORD.E Page 520 of 751 • Neighborhood Park Needs Most of the City has good geographic coverage of Neighborhood Parks. Slight shortages occur in some fully developed neighborhoods, such as the central part of Auburn, but these are offset by Community Parks that serve the same areas. To meet neighborhood park demands 44.29 additional acres will be needed in this category by 2025 to meet the projected increase in population. Several options for meeting these needs are presented below. 2025: Meeting Neighborhood Park Needs To meet a need for 44.29 additional acres of Neighborhood Parks in 2025 it is recommended that the City choose one of the following two options, or a combination of the two: Option 1. Complete development of existing neighborhood parks. The following parks have undeveloped acreage: Auburndale Park 9.74 acres Auburndale Park II 9.34 acres TOTAL: 19.08 acres Both parks listed above are located in the Lea Hill portion of the City, which is in need of additional park area. Completing development of these parks, while needed, is unlikely to 410 create appreciable increases in recreational facilities. Auburndale needs minor improvements such as landscaping and a new playground. Auburndale II is the only undeveloped neighborhood park in the park inventory. Option 2.Acquire and develop new park land. Even with improving Auburndale and developing Auburndale II, the City's parks system will still be deficient for neighborhood parks by over 25 acres. To meet future needs for neighborhood parks, the City needs to consider acquiring additional park property in the West Hill and southeastern areas of the City. 2030: Meeting Neighborhood Park Needs If population continues to increase as expected then the City will need to add 50.97 acres of additional neighborhood park land. This will need to be done by either developing existing City owned property managed by departments other than parks, and/or acquire park land in areas of the City where we are not meeting demands and level of service standards. Community Park Needs Geographic coverage of the city with community parks is good. However, crowding may occasionally occur to their popularity. Analysis by neighborhood area shows that Lea Hill, West Hill, and southeast Auburn are most in need of community parks. Community parks typically contain more highly developed athletic fields than do neighborhood parks, and also provide ORD.E Page 521 of 751 restrooms, parking, picnic shelters and other amenities. This makes them more costly to develop. Based on current standards the City's current Community Park inventory is deficient by 119 acres. This sharp increase in park needs is because the City's population has nearly doubled since the last Park Plan update in 2005. 2025: Meeting Community Park Needs Available Community Park land can be increased by completing partially developed parks, developing unimproved land in City ownership, or by acquiring and developing new land. For example, facilities such as a skate park, loop trail, play structure or basketball court could be added to a partially developed Community Park. Some options for the next decade described below: Option 1. Complete development of existing Community parks. The following existing parks contain undeveloped acreage: West Hill Lake Property 9.25 acres 104th Ave SE Property 14.73 acres Jacobsen Tree Farm 29.30 acres Les Gove Park 4.1 acres Game Farm 4.0 acres Lakeland Hills Nature Area 46.75 TOTAL: 108.13 acres Highest priority should be given to implementing the proposed improvements in the Les Gove Master Plan, developing the West Hill Lake Property, and the Lakeland Hills Nature Area. These parks will provide a significant increase in the level of service for the least amount of money. Next the City needs to explore opportunities to develop Jacobsen Tree Farm into a regional sports complex, and to the 104th Ave SE property along the Green River. All of these parks contain facilities which are very much in demand, and will be most beneficial to the entire community if development occurs. Option 2.Acquire and develop additional park land in the areas of the City where current and future demands are not being met. As previously discussed, areas of Auburn in need of additional Community Park land includes the Lea Hill, West Hill, and southeast Auburn areas of the City. By the year 2025, 158.48 additional acres of park land will need to be developed in order to meet future demands and level of service standards ORD.E Page 522 of 751 • 2030: Meeting Community Park Needs Potential community park locations which have unique resources, or that are expected to receive significant residential development over the next 15 years are identified here. These parks will be acquired and developed concurrently with new housing construction. A balance between passive and active recreational uses should continue to be pursued. By the year 2030, the City will need to add more than 180 acres of Community Park land to meet current standards. Academy Area Park A community park located in the area around the Adventist Academy would serve a large and growing community that is somewhat distant from other recreational sites. This is a desirable location for a well-developed sports complex. Trails/Linear Parks Trails/Linear parks, which generally run along an existing linear feature such as a river or utility corridor, are considered to serve the entire city. Auburn has a unique opportunity for linear park development, with its generous supply of rivers, creeks, railroads and utility corridors. For this reason, it should be emphasized that the standard is only a minimum suggested acreage. This is a category where trail development also serves a transportation need and development beyond the minimum standard will be very useful to community members. • 2025 to 2030: Meeting Trail/Linear Park Needs Like the other types, Trail/Linear Park land can also be increased by completing partially developed parks, by developing unimproved land currently in City ownership, or by acquiring and developing new land. Several possibilities are described below: • Acquire land and easements for the BPA Trail from Jacobsen Tree Farm to the Auburn Golf Course. This will greatly improve connectivity between the Lea Hill and Valley Floor. • Extend the Green River Trail north from the Reddington Levee Trail to South 277th Street. This area is currently owned by King County and the Port of Seattle. • White River Trail extension from A Street SE to the Interurban Trail. • Mill Creek Corridor Trail System on the west side of SR 167. With the recently completed Mill Creek realignment, there is significant environmental education opportunities in this area. • Auburn Environmental Park trail connects to the Interurban Trail. S ORD.E Page 523 of 751 Summary of Park Land Needs Auburn is fortunate to still have many opportunities for expansion of its park system, both to meet the needs of current residents, and for those who will be joining us in the next 15 years. But it requires looking ahead, and sometimes making a commitment to acquiring land suitable for these uses before development makes it impossible. The options presented in the previous pages show the breadth of choices available during the next six to fifteen years. To recap, there are several directions we can take to continue to provide fully developed, high quality parks for our community. We have several options to accomplish this: Option 1. Complete development in existing parks. This approach is the least costly, because property purchase is not necessary. It also will provide the finishing touches that several parks still need. However, most developed parks already contain all the recreational facilities that are possible, and most development is more aesthetic or practical (as in improved parking) in nature. An exception is Les Gove Park. The recently completed Master Plan of the Les Gove Park will open more active/passive opportunities for the community. Option 2. Create parks using land currently owned by the City.Several properties have been purchased or land turned over from King County in recent years that are suitable for Neighborhood and Community Parks. Again, future costs will be lower because property purchase is already complete. The 104 Ave SE, Lakeland Hill Nature Area, and the West Hill Lake properties discussed briefly above will give us the opportunity to develop some unique new Community Parks. Because of their open space character and funding source, these parks are best developed for passive recreations uses. In addition, the Jacobsen Tree Farm property provides an opportunity to develop a regional sports complex in a relatively underserved part of the City. Option 3.Acquire and develop new land, particularly to meet needs of new residents. These parks will be acquired and developed as opportunities arise, such as gifts of land or grants, fee in lieu of, or by impact fees collected from the development of new residential units. ORD.E Page 524 of 751 • II. Meeting Recreation Facility and Program Needs This section presents recreation facilities and programs planned for the present, and for ten and fifteen years from now. Facilities and programs go hand-in-hand, since most recreation, educational or cultural programs are possible only if an adequate facility is available. Each major recreation facility type is discussed below, with suggestions for addressing deficiencies and meeting the goals developed in Chapter 3. These goals can be used as new parks are planned, to determine which facilities are most needed or most appropriate for the park being considered. Facility needs are determined by surveying residents about their level of recreation participation and their needs and desires for the future, by examining national standards and recreation trends, by input from the recreation staff, and by the number and type of sport teams and each sport's play requirements. Baseball Current need: With participation rates and baseball steady at best, the City is currently meeting demands and needs for baseball fields, To meet future need, 2025 to 2030: • One additional baseball field will be needed by 2025 and two fields will need to be added by 2030. It is recommended that this be placed in a new community park in the north or southeast part of the city. Recommended Future Development: Jacobsen Tree Farm Softball/Youth Baseball Fields Current need: With softball and youth baseball numbers holding relatively steady there is a strong need to add more fields. Based on current standards the City is deficient in this category by 11 fields. To meet future need, 2025 to 2030: Development of new community and neighborhood parks should include fields capable of supporting softball and youth baseball. Fields should be located in the following areas as adjacent residential neighborhoods develop. By 2030, it is expected that the City will need to add 18 fields to keep up with the demand of Auburn residents. Recommended Future Development: Academy Area Community Park Jacobsen Tree Farm • ORD.E Page 525 of 751 Football Fields Current need: The demand for football fields has remained fairly constant in recent years. Even with the recent improvements to school district facilities the City needs to add 8 football fields to meet the demands of our current population. The primary need now is for practice time. To meet future need, 2025 to 2030: Ten additional fields will need to be added by 2025 and 18 by 2030. Recommended Future Development: Academy Area Community Park Jacobsen Tree Farm Additional sites to be identified Soccer Current need: The rapidly growing interest in soccer has spurred the need for development of new soccer facilities. The demands and needs calculations considered "mini" or modified fields used for youth and adult leagues respectively. Based on current standards 2 fields need to be added at this time. With the growing popularity of the sport more fields may need be added to meet future demand. To meet future need, 2025 to 2030: Future soccer fields should be located in community parks when they are developed. By the year 2025 a minimum of 6 fields will need to be added, while 9 fields will need be added by the year 2030. With soccer and football being played on similar sized playing fields the development of additional fields could meet the needs for both football and soccer. Recommended Future Soccer Field Development: Jacobsen Tree Farm Academy Area Community Park North Auburn Community Park Additional partnerships with schools and private organizations Tennis Courts Current and future need: Sufficient tennis court space means that additional courts are not needed at this time. The construction of eight tennis courts at Auburn Mountain View High School adjacent to Jacobsen Tree Farm Park will provide sufficient court space for the city for many years. Gymnasiums Current need: Even with the recent construction of the 2 gyms at the Les Gove Community Campus there is still great demand for availability during the day and early evening hours. Calculations indicate ORD.E Page 526 of 751 that the City is short 10 gyms. The construction of the community center later this year will • accommodate fitness classes so some of demand for gym space will be met. It is not realistic to expect to construct 10 new gymnasiums so the City will need to consider other options to gain access to existing gyms around the City. To meet future need,2025 to 2030: Within the next ten to fifteen years an additional twelve to thirteen gymnasiums will be needed respectively. Some of this space may become available if additional schools are built. Meantime, space should be reserved for development of a third gymnasium at the proposed Community Center. Recommended development: Partnerships with private organizations like churches Future School Development 2 gym Swimming Pools Current and future need: Additional need for swimming pools is not expected now or in the near future. The construction of the new YMCA has filled the current need. Loop Trails Current need and future needs: 40 Recreational loop trails are located primarily in neighborhood and community parks, for easy use and access by neighborhood residents. Demands and needs analysis indicates that the City is currently meeting current standards. However walk and jogging trails are overwhelmingly the most popular and desirable park facilities of the residents of Auburn. The following existing and proposed parks are recommended to receive trail development. Recommended Loop Trail Development: Veterans Memorial Park Rotary Park West Hill Watershed Olson Canyon Auburn Environmental Park Recreation/Transportation Trails These longer, destination oriented trails serve recreating cyclists, pedestrians, equestrians and other users, as well as those who use the trail for transportation purposes. Current need and Future Needs: With an increasing interest in alternative modes of transportation for commuting and accessing regional trails systems, recreation and transportation trails are important to the residents of Auburn. Efforts should continue to complete these important trail corridors. 0 ORD.E Page 527 of 751 Recommended Recreation/Transportation Trail Development: Green River Trail White River Trail To meet future need, 2025 to 2030: This plan recommends the development of two Linear Parks to meet the needs of future residents. Mill Creek Corridor and South East Trails are proposed to meet trail needs by the year 2010. Recommended Future Recreation/Transportation Trail Development Mill Creek Corridor: BPA Trail –Jacobsen Tree Farm to Auburn Golf Course Recreation, Cultural and Heritage Program Services Chapter 6, Recreation, Cultural, Heritage and Preservation Programs, developed an extensive list of recommendations and conclusions. Capital Improvements The projects and program improvements suggested in this plan will require a substantial financial commitment to accomplish. Some of these can be achieved within the annual Parks and Recreation Department budget. Other, more costly projects will need to be analyzed carefully to determine the source(s) of funding we want to pursue, and to determine when it will be fiscally advantageous to pursue them. There are five primary funding sources that can be used to finance park capital improvements: 1. City Funding—includes Bonds,the General Fund, and Real Estate Excise Tax 2.Grants and Countywide Initiatives 3. Developer Fees and Dedications (Impact Fees) 4. Gifts/Dedications/Donations 5. Program Fees 1. City Funding The three basic options for City-based financing include the City's General Fund, Councilmanic or General Obligation Bonds, and the Real Estate Excise Tax (REET). Typically, the General Fund pays for staff costs and operating expenses for the Parks and Recreation Department. Ongoing, regular maintenance costs of parks and purchase of equipment are also paid for in this manner. The General Fund has rarely been used in the past for large capital projects such as the purchase of land, or building of new parks. The Real Estate Excise Tax is a 0.5% tax on the sale of real estate. These funds can be used for repair, replacement, and capital expenditures of park facilities. Partnerships with private organizations (OPM). ORD.E Page 528 of 751 2. Grants and Countywide Initiatives Grants have been a very instrumental tool in building the park system we have today. Since the 1980s, the City has received more than $7 million from grant sources. A major source is the Washington State Recreation Office (RCO) which administers state and federal funds for conservation and outdoor recreation purposes. RCO is made up of the directors of four state agencies and five citizen members who bring together a wide range of experience and viewpoints. The largest program offered by the RCO is the Washington Wildlife and Recreation Program (WWRP). This is available for local government projects involving the acquisition, development and renovation of parks, urban wildlife habitat, open space, trails, and water access facilities. All projects accepted for WWRP funding require a 50% local match, and a Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan adopted within the last six years. This Parks Plan will enable the City of Auburn to apply for these funds from 2016 through 2022. King County has several grant programs which have helped the City purchase land and/or develop eight recreation sites in Auburn. We will continue to aggressively pursue all grant opportunities that will assist in the renovation of existing parks, or development of new ones. 3. Developer Fees The State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) allows cities to request mitigation for impacts to the park system created by large scale residential development. In Auburn land has been contributed by developers to create Lakeland Hills Park, Sunset Park, Gaines Park, and Mill Pond Park. Existing standards for the City assert that developments of 50 or more dwelling units create sufficient impact on the availability of park space that mitigation should be provided. The 1986 Park Plan established standards of 6 acres per 1000 residents for Community Parks and 1.25 acres per 1000 for Neighborhood Parks. Under SEPA developers typically contribute land only, and the City is responsible for all development. This 2005 Parks Plan recommended the adoption of impact fees for parks, as allowed by the Growth Management Act of 1990. Impact fees for parks are used to pay for the capital costs of public facilities needed to serve the people who occupy new residential development. Capital costs may include the purchase of land and costs for designing and constructing recreation facilities. These fees are paid by the developer of any residential unit, not just by those building more than 50 units. The term "developer" is used to denote anyone who is obligated to pay impact fees, including builders, owners or developers. Credit for Contributions by the Developer S ORD.E Page 529 of 751 Impact fees do not include any other forms of developer contributions or exactions, such as mitigation or voluntary payments authorized by SEPA. Since there are other sources of revenue available for park development, impact fees are not expected to pay for 100% of new park development. The City also has the choice of accepting cash for the impact fee, or accepting land, recreational improvements or a combination of these. If the City accepts a method other than cash, the developer will receive a credit in-lieu of impact fees. Service Area for Impact Fees and Expenditures Parks and recreation facilities impact fees are collected and expended throughout the City of Auburn. The City boundaries create a single service area for park impact fees. Impact fees must be spent on capital projects contained in an adopted capital facilities plan, or they can be used to reimburse the government for the unused capacity of existing facilities. For example, some existing park land is not yet fully developed. Where improvements for these areas are identified in this plan, impact fees can be used to help pay for such improvements. Impact fees not expended within six years must be refunded. Development Standards This Plan depicts five different types of park land within Auburn: 1. Neighborhood parks 2.Community parks 3.Trails/Linear parks 4.Open space land 5.Special use areas The first three of these, Neighborhood, Community and Trails/Linear Parks are considered the "core" parks in our system. These are the parks which are the most intensely developed and used for recreation. Developers will be required to contribute to this core system by providing cash, land, recreational facilities, or a combination, as described above. The standards established in Chapter 3 of this plan will be used to determine the parks impact fee. Section II of this chapter identifies capital projects that will be (1) needed to maintain the City's current level of parks and recreation facilities, and (2) needed to meet the expected growth, based on the adopted development standards. Rates for Impact Fees Impact fees are calculated based on the projected cost of buying land appropriate for each of the park categories, and the costs of purchasing, installing or constructing the recreation facilities and amenities typical to each type of park. A separate cost calculation is made for each of the three types of core parks. Impact fee rates are found in the document "Rate Study for Impact Fees for Parks and Recreation Facilities." 4. Gifts The City occasionally receives gifts of land, land leases, or money for park properties. These have primarily come from other public agencies. ORD.E Page 530 of 751 The City pursued gifts in the Sharing and Gift Catalog. This source will be explored and 410 marketed in the future more thoroughly. The Parks Department intends to establish a "Give to the Future" program to encourage more private donations. The program will provide information to individuals about how to contribute, the tax benefits of giving, and projects that need sponsors. Capital campaigns to solicit funds could be a significant source of income for special projects. For example, the White River Valley Historical Museum raised $480,000 in cash and in-kind donations through its very effective capital campaign. These funds will enable the Historical Society to make significant improvements to the Museum building and displays. 5. Program Fees Another method for raising capital or covering operating expenses may include increasing fees for facilities such as picnic shelters or baseball fields. Similarly, increasing the administrative charge on recreation programs and classes is necessary periodically. The City's goal is to keep fees affordable to individuals who are residents of Auburn and to small groups. However, when large groups use facilities, fees should be charged that reflect the additional staffing, equipment and cleanup needed. An example of program fees is the capital improvement fee charged to adult athletic teams. This fee generates about $20,000 annually. These funds have been used to improve facilities used by adult athletic teams such as the installation of a new restroom at Fulmer Field and a • new light system at Brannan Park Field #2. Summary of Park Financing Options The City has several options it can use to fund development of new parks, and improvements or expansions of existing parks. The most realistic approach is to pursue each of the five primary funding mechanisms described above. With the adoption of the Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, the City will be eligible to compete for grants from RCO and other sources. To efficiently use limited staff grant writing time the Parks and Recreation Department intends to aggressively track and apply for those grants that will be most beneficial to the City and for which it has a good chance of success. • ORD.E Page 531 of 751 • PUBLIC OUTREACH OVERVIEW • July 14-staff presentation to Auburn Noon Lions • July 18-citywide email is sent out announcing public workshops • July 18-citywide postcard mailer is sent out announcing public workshops; also dropped at local grocery stores, all city facilities (e.g. parks, golf course), YMCA, etc. • July 21-staff presentation to Auburn Senior Center Advisory Board • August 5-staff presentation to Rotary • August 6-Lakeland Community Center workshop • August 7-Mayor's weekly email update announcing workshops • August 11-Auburn Library workshop • August 12-staff presentation to Soroptimist • August 13-Wesley Homes workshop • August 18-Valley Counseling workshop • August 20-staff presentation to Kiwanis • August 31-citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Plan • October 13-webpage is updated with the Core Plan and Volumes 1, 2 and 5 and all appendices • October 13-"Talk Auburn" web based commenting portal is launched so that the public may submit comments • October 13-transmit Core Plan and Volumes 1, 2 and 5 to PSRC and State Department of Commerce • • October 20-citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Plan • October 26-City Council Study Session • October 20-Planning Commission meeting • November 1-citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Plan • November 2-City Council Study Session • November 4-Planning Commission meeting/hearing • November 9-City Council Study Session • November 10-webpage is updated with Volumes 3,4, 6 and 7 • November 10-transmit Volumes 3, 4, 6 and 7 to PSRC and State Department of Commerce • November 19-citywide email is sent out requesting comment on the Plan • November 23-City Council Study Session • December 8- Planning Commission meeting/hearing I ORD.E Page 532 of 751 Exhibit 13 Public Comment #1 • C` .BE + JUSTIN S.HARVEY Senior Vice President-Investments Auburn Planning Commission 25 W Main Street, Auburn,WA 98001 RE: Proposed Revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan Dear Planning Commissioners: Cabot Properties, through the entity Cabot IV—WA1 W02,LLC,is the owner of the property located at 402 Lund Road in Auburn. I am writing in support of the Community Development&Public Works Department's recommended revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan that redesignates as"Light Industrial"the lands now identified as"Environmental Park" in the City's existing Comprehensive Plan. We strongly urge the City to adopt this change to its Comprehensive Plan and to rezone to M-1 -Light Industrial all properties now zoned EP-Environmental Park. Our property, like many surrounding properties,was developed under the Light Industrial zoning that was in place in this portion of Auburn prior to the enactment of zoning by the City in 2006 that designated my property and surrounding properties as being in the EP-Environmental Park zone. As you know, the EP zoning never attracted the type of development that may have been contemplated at the time of its • adoption. Moreover, the constraints imposed by the EP zone created significant problems for me and other similarly situated owners,whose properties had been developed with Light Industrial uses. As you know, last year we successfully sought changes to the zoning code to remove the threat of nonconforming use status to all of the existing warehousing and distribution uses located in the EP zone. However,that was only a temporary fix. The permanent solution,now recommended by staff,is to return these properties to their appropriate Light Industrial zoning. This change will encourage reinvestment in these properties and bring economic growth to the City. We encourage your support of the staff's recommended changes to return this portion of Auburn to a Light Industrial land use classification and to rezone these properties to Light Industrial as soon as possible. Please feel free to reach out to me at(617) 305-6143 with any questions. Thank you. Best regards, Justin S. Harvey Senior Vice President—Investments Cabot Properties, LP • Cabot Properties, LP One Beacon Street,Suite 1700 • Boston,Massachusetts 02108 • Tel(617)305-6143 • Fax(617)723-4200 ORD.E Page 533 of 751 Public Comment #2 Auburn Planning Commission 25 W Main Street, Auburn, WA 98001 RE: Proposed Revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan Dear Planning Commissioners: 9 15:� � !� ll Jill Moodie for the Lund Building V 4 902 4th Street S.W. Auburn, WA 98001 `-IT p�:kUf�JUI PJ 'LA'I�I,� I'f � Def+ !O'''UtENt I am writing in support of the Community Development & Public Works Department's recommended revisions to the Auburn Comprehensive Plan that redesignates as "Light Industrial" the lands now identified as "Environmental Park" in the City's existing Comprehensive Plan. We strongly urge the City to adopt this change to its Comprehensive Plan and to rezone to M-1 - Light Industrial all properties now zoned EP - Environmental Park. My property, like many surrounding properties,was developed under the Light Industrial zoning that was in place in this portion of Auburn prior to the enactment of zoning by the City in 2006 that designated my property and surrounding properties as being in the EP- Environmental Park zone. As you know,the EP zoning never attracted the type of development that may have been contemplated at the time of its adoption. Moreover,the constraints imposed by the EP zone created significant problems for me and other similarly situated owners,whose properties had been developed with Light Industrial uses. Our building had nonconforming uses.The building was designed wholly for light industrial, distribution and warehousing only. The change to the EP zoning made it impossible for us to refinance our building for years. Lending institutions will not loan money on a building that has nonconforming uses.This also made the property unsalable. A buyer could not procure financing to purchase the building from us. The EP zoning also left us exposed to a catastrophic financial loss if the building was heavily damaged because we would have been unable to rebuild it with insurance proceeds as the uses of the building were nonconforming. As you know, last year we successfully sought changes to the zoning code to remove the threat of nonconforming use status to all of the existing warehousing and distribution uses located in the EP zone. However, that was only a temporary fix. The permanent solution, now recommended by staff, is to return these properties to their appropriate Light Industrial zoning. This change will encourage reinvestment in these properties and bring economic growth to the City. We encourage your support of the staff's recommended changes to return this portion of Auburn to a Light Industrial land use classification and to rezone these properties to Light Industrial as soon as possible. Jill Moodie 2' - - ORD.E //,‘, Page 534 of 751 Pucet Sound Reciona Council Public Comment#3 v PSRC (1111 November 3,2015 Jeff Tate,Deputy Director City of Auburn Community Development Services 25 W Main Street Auburn,WA 98001 Subject: PSRC comments on draft Auburn Comprehensive Plan update Dear Jeff, Thank you for providing an opportunity for the Puget Sound Regional Council to review draft elements of the City of Auburn 2015 Comprehensive Plan. We recognize the substantial amount of time and effort invested in this plan and appreciate the chance to review it while in draft form.This timely collaboration helps to ensure certification requirements are adequately addressed and certification action can be taken by PSRC boards upon adoption. In providing an expedited review, this letter addresses the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Core Plan only. PSRC will provide additional comments in follow-up correspondence on Land Use,Housing, and additional plan elements. We would like to note the many outstanding aspects of the draft plan components that serve to implement VISION 2040. Several particularly noteworthy aspects include: • An innovative approach to organizing the plan document that focuses on city values,plan outcomes, and prioritizing actions. • Clear discussion and policies addressing interjurisdictional coordination in the city's planning. • Emphasis on providing mobility options to people with special needs, including an analysis of transit- dependent communities in the city. • Provisions supporting multimodal transportation options and design for healthy communities. • Emphasis on preservation and maintenance of the transportation system. The draft Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Core Plan advance regional policy in many important ways. There are a few items,however,that should be addressed before the plan is finalized: • VISION 2040 calls for local plans to include a context statement that describes how the plan addresses regional policies and provisions adopted in VISION 2040. Examples of context statements are provided in PSRC's Plan Review Manual,page 2-1. PSRC staff is also available to provide examples adopted in local comprehensive plans. • VISION 2040 contains policies(MPP-DP-7,MPP-T-12)that encourage local jurisdictions to prioritize infrastructure funding, including transportation and capital facility investments,to support the development of regional growth centers.The city is encouraged to include compatible policy language and supportive infrastructure investments where appropriate. • The plan discusses several future nonmotorized and Safe Routes to Schools investments. The city should consolidate the list of transportation investments and include these types of projects in the comprehensive 20-year transportation list. • In its functional classification, the city has designated street subcategories of"urban"and"rustic" collectors and local residential streets,which reflect differing standards and ability to accommodate nonmotorized facilities. The map of the street classifications doesn't provide detail on which streets are classified as"urban"or"rustic." The city should consider mapping this street classification or providing a description of where these facilities are located. • The plan notes that a sidewalk inventory was developed in 2005 and updated in 2008 to account for • recent annexations. The inventory should be updated to depict current conditions,particularly given 1 ORD.E Page 535 of 751 that the plan mentions several recent nonmotorized improvements. More information about developing inventories can be found in the Department of Commerce transportation guidebook, Chapter 4C. • As called for in VISION 2040(DP-Action-l8),the city should include mode split goals for the regional growth center. PSRC recently produced a,:. : lee about setting mode split goals that the city may find helpful in this work. • Policy Funding-08 calls for reassessing the land use element if funding is insufficient to maintain adopted level of service standards. There are several additional reassessment strategies beyond revising the land use element that the city could consider in event of a funding shortfall. The WAC (365-196-430)also recommends considering additional funding for improvements,adjusting level of service standards,revisiting identified needs,and utilization of transportation demand management strategies. • The city is commended for including in the plan a 20-year list of transportation projects,along with general discussion of financing approaches. The plan should include more detail on the multiyear financing plan for needed transportation improvements, including an analysis of probable funding adequacy for projects and programs identified in the transportation element for the planning period. Further guidance on how to address the financial analysis in your plan can be found in RCW 36.70A.070,WAC 365-196-430,and the Department of Commerce transportation guidebook. • The Core Comprehensive Plan includes a discussion of capacity and growth targets assigned to the city. Review of the draft noted several minor discrepancies in the table and description. The city should review the assessment to ensure that it is using accurate and consistent targets and capacity information from both counties. PSRC staff are available to provide technical assistance as needed. PSRC has resources available to assist the city in addressing these comments.Additional resources related to the plan review process can also be found at http: -www.psrc.orgigrowth planreview'resources/. Thank you again for working with us through the plan review process. There is a lot of strong work in the draft and we are available to continue to provide assistance and additional reviews as the plan moves through the development process. If you have questions or need additional information regarding the review of local plans or the certification process,please contact me at 206-464-6174 or LUnderwood-Bultmann(u;hsrc.or . Sincerely, lit - `` l Liz Underwood-Bultmann Associate Planner,Growth Management Planning cc: Review Team,Growth Management Services,Department of Commerce 2 ORD.E Page 536 of 751 Public Comment #1 HOUSING DEVELOPMENT consortium HDC'•,Affordable Housing Members; November 3, 2015Law income Noosing,Cr n,ations Community Development City of Auburn Planning Commission corporations City of Auburn special Needs Hous+re 25 W Main Street organizations Auburn, WA 98001 Public Housing Authorities Community Action Agencies RE: Comprehensive Plan Housing Element Update Workforce Housing Organizations Public Developmeilf Authorities Dear Commission Members, �nc,es and Government Ag. Commissions On behalf of the Housing Development Consortium of King County(HDC), Architects and Designers thank you for this opportunity to comment on your Comprehensive Plan Housing Development specialists Element update. certified Public Accountants Regional Funders and Lenders HDC is a nonprofit membership organization which represents more than 100 National Funders and Lenders • private businesses,nonprofit organizations, and public partners who are working to develop affordable housing and provide housing-related services in King Commui,tv�nvesunem specia+�5t5 County. HDC's members are dedicated to the vision that all people should be Pr„perty Ivlanageis able to live in a safe, healthy, and affordable home in a community of opportuity. Lax firms In other words, we believe all people, regardless of income, deserve the ce,�tractors opportunity to thrive in a safe neighborhood with good jobs, quality schools, and strong access to transit. We very much appreciate Auburn's work toward achieving this vision, for example, through your support of permanent supportive housing developments like Valley Cities Landing. This Comprehensive Plan update provides you an ideal opportunity to explore what other strategies are necessary to create an inclusive and affordable community for all of Auburn's residents. To that end, we would like to provide the following comments to help guide your Housing Element work on the issues of: healthy housing, development incentives, and very-low income housing. ❖ Healthy Housing: Preserving Auburn's Existing Affordable Housing As you know, Auburn has a robust stock of unsubsidized housing that is naturally affordable in the private market. Preserving the quality and affordability of 'word"ig p�F'° 411111 ORD.E Page 537 of 751 1 Fdx 206.673 zli>idi `oiw .hnusn: existing homes is one of the best ways to ensure Auburn families can afford a place to live. Housing rehabilitation promotes vibrant neighborhoods and improves health outcomes, making it easier for Auburn's residents to thrive. The City's housing needs assessment reports the housing stock to be in fair or poor condition, and maintenance and rehabilitation needs will grow over time without significant reinvestment. If rental property owners and homeowners lack the funding necessary to maintain their homes, residents' health may be severely impacted by housing health and safety hazards. These conditions include mold, pests, injury hazards, and poor indoor air quality. We applaud the policies in your Draft Housing Element that address safe neighborhoods,healthy housing, and housing preservation, including policies H-7, H-20, H-21, and H-22. We are excited to see policies related to loans for rehabilitation as well as the exploration of a multifamily rental inspection program. We encourage you to incorporate additional details into your Housing Element to ensure these programs explicitly benefit low income households. As one example, whenever public funds are used to support rehabilitation, you could require some units to be affordable and available to households at 60% AMI or below through a policy that states: "Ensure that housing created or preserved using local public resources or by regulation benefits low-income households and retains its affordability over time." In HDC's recent report, iinprocinh IIcalth and klousing in South King County, we explore some emerging programs and policies to support the health and preservation of South King County's housing stock. For example, community health workers can educate residents about health outcomes from housing conditions and connect them to the appropriate programs and resources for home improvements. Another strategy—a Property Tax Exemption for Housing Preservation—can incentivize private landlords to repair buildings and ensure affordability of some rehabilitated units. We strongly encourage you to explore incorporating these strategies into H-20, H-21,or H-22 through implementation steps such as: "Support additional healthy housing and preservation strategies, such as community health workers and a preservation property tax exemption, to preserve affordable housing opportunities and offer property owners and residents the education and resources needed to maintain housing." ❖ Development Incentives: Creating Communities of Opportunity As Auburn works to create mixed-use development in neighborhoods with close proximity to transit,jobs, services and other opportunities, we encourage you to explore strategies which could help ensure some of this housing is affordable. If low and moderate-income residents can afford to live in communities of opportunity, they won't be forced to stretch their budgets so far on things like gas and high-priced groceries at convenience stores. Development incentives would make it easier for Auburn's lower-income families to afford opportunity-rich neighborhoods. We therefore ask that the City include policies in its Housing Element that promote the use of development incentives for affordable housing. The City can use development incentives like reduced parking standards, fee waivers, tax exemptions, and density bonuses to help ensure affordability where new development occurs. By implementing these types of policies in service of affordability, the City can leverage the power of the private market to create quality, affordable housing and promote economic development with very limited public investment. ORD.E Page 538 of 751 HDC suggests the following language to incorporate development incentives into Auburn's • Housing Element: "Explore the use of density bonuses, parking reductions, multi-family tax exemptions, fee waivers and exemptions, and permit expediting to encourage the development of housing affordable at below market-rate." Research shows that low-income residents living near transit are less likely to own vehicles than higher income households living in transit nodes. Promoting affordable housing near transit can help reduce carbon emissions and increase active modes of transportation and physical activity. In order to ensure safety and connectivity,we encourage you to add detail to policy H-3 to "invest in transportation improvements that will create safe neighborhoods for walking, biking, and connecting to transit." ❖ Very-Low Income Housing: Addressing Homelessness & Meeting Community Needs Children deserve a chance to succeed in school and in life, which all begins with their family being able to afford a decent place to live. Unfortunately, family homelessness is very real in South King County. During the 2013-2014 school year, the Auburn School Districted reported 208 homeless students. This crisis has severe, system-wide impacts, affecting physical health, educational outcomes, and psychological well-being. By ensuring that these students have a safe, healthy place to come home to everyday, we can begin to bridge the achievement gap and stabilize families. We encourage you to consider a policy in your Housing Element that recognizes and addresses homelessness, such as: "Work with other jurisdictions and health and social service organizations to implement a coordinated, regional approach to homelessness." One of the best ways to prevent homelessness is to ensure quality, permanently affordable • housing for very-low income households. We very much appreciate Auburn's attention to the countywide Planning Policies (CPPB) and the recognition that addressing the countywide need for housing affordable to very-low income households will require efforts by all jurisdictions working individually and collectively. Along these lines, we also appreciate the Housing Element's Partnership and Monitoring policies, which will go a long way toward addressing the Countywide need for very-low, low-, and moderate-income housing. That said, we urge you to add detail to Policy H-26 and the Housing Objectives and Tools chart related to the need for very-low income housing in Auburn. A policy to this end could state: "Act as a County leader in the exploration and implementation of new funding mechanisms and strategies to develop housing affordable at 30% AMI and below across King County and throughout South King County." Although Auburn's housing stock is relatively affordable, many residents still struggle tremendously to afford housing. In fact, 28%of Auburn's renters are paying over half of their income in housing costs, compared to 21% in King County overall and 23% in Pierce County overall. We encourage you to incorporate this data into your Housing Conditions and Trends Summary to provide a more complete portrait of community housing need within the Housing Element. Auburn can further plan for very-low income housing needs through"support of nonprofit organizations during all stages of siting and project planning and when applying for county, state, and federal funding." ORD.E Page 539 of 751 We believe it is possible for all hardworking families in Auburn to afford housing and still have enough money left over for the basics like goceries, gas,medicine, and childcare. We applaud your attention to the needs of households across the income spectrum and encourage you to strengthen your Housing Element by implementing the policy and implementation language suggested above. Thank you for your consideration. We at HDC look forward to working with you as you continue to update your Comprehensive Plan and would be happy to discuss these comments with you further. We can be reached by phone at(206) 682-9541 or by email at hdelu.housill',eo[liortium. jg. We hope you will contact us with any questions. Best, 73dM — Kayla Schott-Bresler Kelly i er Policy Manager Policy Director 4 ORD.E Page 540 of 751 Public Comment #5 Puget Sound Regiona' Counci PSRC • November 12,2015 Jeff Tate,Deputy Director City of Auburn Community Development Services 25 W Main Street Auburn,WA 98001 Subject: PSRC comments on draft Auburn Comprehensive Plan update–.-fdditional Elements Dear Jeff, Thank you for providing an opportunity for the Puget Sound Regional Council to review draft elements of the City of Auburn 2015 Comprehensive Plan. We recognize the substantial amount of time and effort invested in this plan and appreciate the chance to review it while in draft form.This timely collaboration helps to ensure certification requirements are adequately addressed and certification action can be taken by PSRC boards upon adoption. This letter follows correspondence dated November 3,2015 on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Core Plan documents. This letter addresses all remaining plan elements,including land use,housing, capital facilities,utilities,economic development,parks,and related appendices. We would like to note the many outstanding aspects of the draft plan elements that serve to implement VISION 2040. Several particularly noteworthy aspects include: • Emphasis in the housing element on special needs housing,healthy housing,human services,and preservation of affordable housing. • A comprehensive housing needs assessment,which includes an excellent data assessment as well as 4110 targeted demographic outreach through interviews and focus groups to provide a clearer understanding of community housing needs. • Inclusion of a greenhouse gas inventory that provides a baseline assessment and forecast of emissions in the City of Auburn. • A Health Impact Assessment of the comprehensive plan—the first of its kind in the region—which provides valuable perspective on approaches to health and wellness in the plan. • Completion of an updated Airport Master Plan for Auburn Municipal Airport,which provides important information on airport operations as well as airport compatible land use and zoning. The draft comprehensive plan elements advance regional policy in many important ways.There are a few items,however,that should be addressed before the plan is finalized: • MPP-DP-3 calls for jurisdictions with designated regional growth centers to include housing and employment targets for growth in the centers planned for over the next 20 years. PSRC recently produced additional guidance about setting center targets that the city may fmd helpful in this work. • VISION 2040 calls for all unincorporated lands within the urban growth area to transition into cities and assumes this transition to be largely complete by 2040. The draft plan includes policies addressing boundaries and affiliation of these areas. In addition,the city should consider incorporating policies and provisions that address the orderly transition of remaining unincorporated areas to city governance,such as by working with the counties on coordinating development standards,transferring permitting authority,and addressing service and infrastructure financing. • MPP-En-20-25 in VISION 2040 and the strategies in Transportation 2040 call for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to impacts related to climate change. See page 42 of V I S IO N 2040 for an overview of climate change and related policies and page 34 in Transportation 2040 for information on the four-part greenhouse gas reduction strategy(land use,user fees,choices,and technology).The draft comprehensive plan addresses these policies in a number of ways,most notably through inclusion of a greenhouse gas inventory for the City of Auburn.The plan includes policies 1 ORD.E Page 541 of 751 that support actions that would contribute to reduction in greenhouse gases,such as providing alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel.However,the plan should be strengthened by adding policies on climate change and policies and provisions that support additional strategies such as emissions reductions from municipal operations and additional transportation demand management strategies(MPP-En-24). Helpful information on identifying emissions-reducing strategies can be found in the Washington State Climate Change Resources, Washington State Integrated Climate C'flange Response Strategy,and PSRC Climate Change Information. • VISION 2040 contains policies in several areas that promote energy-efficient building,energy conservation,renewable energy,and alternative energy sources(MPP-DP-49, MPP-PS-12-13; MPP- En-21-23;MPP-T-6). While the draft plan has policies to promote conservation of water,it would be strengthened by adding policies to address energy,as well as environmentally friendly and energy- efficient building. PSRC has resources available to assist the city in addressing these comments. Additional resources related to the plan review process can also be found at http. 'wWw.psre.org;growth planreeiew/resourcesj. Thank you again for working with us through the plan review process. There is a lot of strong work in the draft and we are available to continue to provide assistance and additional reviews as the plan moves through the development process. If you have questions or need additional information regarding the review of local plans or the certification process,please contact me at 206-464-6174 or Ll.i nderwood-Bupsrc.org. Sincerely, Liz Underwood-Bultmann Associate Planner,Growth Management Planning cc: Review Team,Growth Management Services,Department of Commerce 2 ORD.E Page 542 of 751 From: Jeff Tatq To: Tina Krisa • Subject: FW:Core section of Comp Plan Date: Friday, November 20,2015 11:44:02 AM Comment #6 Public Comment#6 From: Pete Beaupain [mailto:pbeaupain©comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 7:52 PM To: Jeff Tate Subject: Core section of Comp Plan I have finished looking it over. There are a bunch of small suggestions/typos/comments marked in it. I plan to mail it to you and trust you to find the right person to take it to. I hope you don't mind being my emissary. I do appreciate your help in getting it to me. And your willingness to be a little whimsical while interacting with me. To me, it is a LOT more bearable to do work like this when I can put some fun into it. Regarding reviewing any other sections, I think I won't. I have some other do-gooder projects I am working on, and they need some attention. Overall, I think the Comp Plan has a very positive, forward-looking attitude. If the City is able to • actually accomplish even a quarter of it, I think the whole populace will be significantly better off. I wish you well in the effort. It is you people in the staff positions who will provide the continuity among changing mayoral and council election-winners. Regarding the current mayor and council, I think they are a really good group who genuinely want to make Auburn a better place. I hope it seems the same way to you folks who work with them daily. I am not going to ask you to comment about that, however. One other thing: whom should I talk (or email) with to learn more about the proposed homelessness project? And, as a wrapup, here are some general thoughts about the Comp Plan stuff I reviewed. 1. The proposed land use policies on Page 33 seem like a large burden to place on developers; I fear the policies will scare developers away to nearby cities which have less draconian desires. I suggest that these plans be discussed with some developers before being set in concrete. 2. Unless sidewalks get designated as "trails" in many areas, I think that acquiring rights of way for trails will be difficult in areas that are already developed because the land is already owned and occupied. Can eminent domain be used to acquire trail rights of way? Would you even want to do that? It could make you a lot of enemies. On the brighter side, I have heard of many instances in which landowners originally were strongly opposed to trails but found them to be beneficial after they were in place and in use. Some of my • ORD.E Page 543 of 751 other activities are with trails groups, and I encounter this kind of info. 3. There is a lot of emphasis in the Comp Plan on pedestrian and bicycle transportation (I think skating should also be considered). I think that is a great idea. However, trail etiquette MUST be strongly emphasized on these trails. Keeping fast-moving bicycles and skaters from startling or hitting pedestrians has to be a powerful concern. In particular, it has been my experience that getting bicyclists to warn people when they are approaching from behind is VERY difficult. 4. Regarding the Sustainable goal in the Transportation Element (Page 47), my only comment is, Dream on, dream on,Teenage Queen! That's enough. I have other things to do. And I really would like to converse with someone about the homelessness project. Pete B. ORD.E Page 544 of 751 Public Comment#7 November 19, 2015 VIA Email • Jeff Tate City of Auburn Dear Mr. Tate, This letter is in response for comment regarding the Draft Proposal of Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Don Small & Sons Oil has been in Auburn at the current location since the 1960's, as well as the property use has also been the same when the parcel was owned by Union Oil since the early 1900's. The company and its locations are an asset to the City. We provide needed products, services and jobs. The company is adding value to the City tax base via sales tax revenue, b&o tax and property taxes. We have the ability to keep all agencies in operation in the event of power failure; we are a designated Emergency Responder for temporary power generators, heating oil and fuel for farms. We have the storage capacity to sustain the power for a longer duration in the event of need and have the only legal place to transfer fuels from Seattle to Tacoma. Since the city doesn't directly notify property owners of potential changes to the • property use per the proposed comprehensive land use plan, after review of the draft document there are several potential changes that cause us concern. Our existing use of the land today is the same as the historical use. We wish to maintain our zoning M-1 status thereby continuing our business legally without being non-conforming to these comprehensive plan changes. These properties are in the border area from the BN track East to A St NW and North of 1't St NW to 3rd NW. Additionally, another location located on C St, North of 3rd, W of the BN tracks also is in a zone that the current use would be non-conforming. This location was the first to invest in the installation of dispensing an alternative fuel for automobile use, which is an expanding market. We also have 2 locations; 210 W Main and 520 E Main that are in the Downtown designation. These locations are neighborhood commercial businesses and should be considered a permitted usage. Another location 5550 Auburn Way S. is not in the Downtown designation and is a Neighborhood commercial business but its land use will change to residential per the review of the draft map. We appreciate your consideration of our land use change concerns. Thank you. • ORD.E Page 545 of 751 Respectfully, 4,/u1,7) ‘,4 -6,-/ Stephen J. Small President Cc: Honorable Mayor Nancy Backus ORD.E Page 546 of 751