The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6632 (2)ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 3 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING 2016 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn City Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 3, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received privately-initiated map amendments in previous years (File Nos. CPA14-0002 & CPA15-0002) however these applications were not complete for processing; and Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 1 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn did not receive any privately-initiated map or text/policy amendments for the year 2016 annual amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated one map amendment (CPA16-0002) and five text/policy amendments (File No. CPA16-0001); and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments were processed by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2016 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP15-0022 (Romart LLC), SEP15-0016 Kana B. LLC), SEP16-0010 (City-initiated Text) & SEP16-0018 (City-initiated Map)) and were determined to have no environmental significance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on June 21, 2016 and on November 9, 2016, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearings the Auburn City Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2016 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2016, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2016, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application CPA14-0002, Romart Investments LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" for an approximately 2.27-acre parcel identified by parcel number: 0520051045 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's November 9, 2016 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the October 19, 2016, staff report, both attached as Exhibit "B". Section 2. Application CPA15-0002, Kana B. LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Light Commercial" and Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's June 21, 2016 recommendations, and the Ordinance No. 6632. November 30, 2016 Page 3 findings and conclusions outlined in the June 9, 2016, staff report, both attached as Exhibit "D". Section 3. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map Amendment CPA16-0002) is adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "E" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "E" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Section 4. The 2016 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA16-0001), as set forth in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are adopted and approved. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "F" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's recommendations, dated November 9, 2016, and the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the October20, 2016, staff report, attached as Exhibit "B". Section 5. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703; and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995; and adopted December 14, 2015 by Ordinance No. 6584. Section 6. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 4 Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21 C.060. Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", Exhibit "D", Exhibit E" and Exhibit "F" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. INTRODUCED: DEC -'5 2016 PASSED: DEC - 5 2016 APPROVED: DEC - 5 2016 ATTEST: NANCY-BAC SS,Mayor Daniele E. Daskam, City Clerk APP- :VED AS TO FORM: D. el B. HeCity ' ora, Published: (Thant,....-,\,e, , Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 5 Exhibit "A" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" for an approximately 2.2.7-acre parcel identified by parcel number 0520051045 for Romart Investments LLC. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA14-0002"tab in the working binder). Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016. Page 6 Exhibit "B" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 19, 2016. CPA14-0002, for a change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial"for an approximately 2.27-acre parcel identified by parcel number 0520051045 for Romart Investments LLC. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 7 Exhibit "C" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Light Commercial" and "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 for Kana B. LLC. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA15-0002"tab in the working binder).. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 8 Exhibit "D" Agenda bill/staff report dated June 9, 2016. CPA 15-0002, for a change from "Light Commercial" and "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 for Kana B. LLC. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 9 Exhibit E Colored map as an excerpt of "Comprehensive Plan", showing the change from "Light Industrial" and "Institutional" to "Heavy Commercial" for three parcels identified by Parcel Nos. 2421049004, 2421049114 and 24210.49115. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Arnendtnents" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 10 Exhibit "F" The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan See "Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 11 ORDINANCE NO. 6 6 3 2 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING 2016 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A WHEREAS, on August 18, 1986, the City Council of the City of Auburn adopted a Comprehensive Plan by Resolution No. 1703 which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 1995, the Auburn City Council adopted Comprehensive Plan Amendments by Resolution No. 2635 to comply with the Washington State Growth Management Act; and WHEREAS, on September 5, 1995, the Auburn City Council reaffirmed that action by its adoption of Ordinance No. 4788; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan which includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 3, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received privately-initiated map amendments in previous years (File Nos. CPA14-0002 & CPA15-0002) however these applications were not complete for processing; and Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 1 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn did not receive any privately-initiated map or text/policy amendments for the year 2016 annual amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated one map amendment (CPA16-0002) and five text/policy amendments (File No. CPA16-0001); and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments were processed by the Community Development & Public Works Department as proposed Year 2016 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, maintaining a current Capital Facilities Plan is required of the City in order to meet regulations of the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP15-0022 (Romart LLC), SEP15-0016 Kana B. LLC), SEP16-0010 (City-initiated Text) & SEP16-0018 (City-initiated Map)) and were determined to have no environmental significance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on June 21, 2016 and on November 9, 2016, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, at the public hearings the Auburn City Planning Commission heard and considered the public testimony and the evidence and exhibits presented to it; and Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Auburn City Planning Commission thereafter made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2016 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2016, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations to the City Council; and WHEREAS, on December 5, 2016, the Auburn City Council considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments as recommended by the City of Auburn Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application CPA14-0002, Romart Investments LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" for an approximately 2.27-acre parcel identified by parcel number: 0520051045 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's November 9, 2016 recommendations, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the October 19, 2016, staff report, both attached as Exhibit "B". Section 2. Application CPA15-0002, Kana B. LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Light Commercial" and Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 is approved as set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's June 21, 2016 recommendations, and the Ordinance No. 6632. November 30, 2016 Page 3 findings and conclusions outlined in the June 9, 2016, staff report, both attached as Exhibit "D". Section 3. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map Amendment CPA16-0002) is adopted and approved as set forth in Exhibit "E" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "E" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Section 4. The 2016 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA16-0001), as set forth in Exhibit "F" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, are adopted and approved. The City Clerk shall file Exhibit "F" along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted with the City's Comprehensive Plan, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk shall file them along with this Ordinance and keep them available for public inspection. Council adopts both the Planning Commission's recommendations, dated November 9, 2016, and the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the October20, 2016, staff report, attached as Exhibit "B". Section 5. The 2016 Comprehensive Plan amendments modify the Comprehensive Plan adopted on August 18, 1986, by Resolution No. 1703; and adopted by Ordinance No. 4788 on September 5, 1995; and adopted December 14, 2015 by Ordinance No. 6584. Section 6. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 4 Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21 C.060. Section 7. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance or any of the Comprehensive Plan amendments adopted herein, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached hereto as Exhibit "A", Exhibit "B", Exhibit "C", Exhibit "D", Exhibit E" and Exhibit "F" preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. INTRODUCED: DEC -'5 2016 PASSED: DEC - 5 2016 APPROVED: DEC - 5 2016 ATTEST: NANCY-BAC SS,Mayor Daniele E. Daskam, City Clerk APP- :VED AS TO FORM: D. el B. HeCity ' ora, Published: (Thant,....-,\,e, , Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 5 Exhibit "A" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial" for an approximately 2.2.7-acre parcel identified by parcel number 0520051045 for Romart Investments LLC. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA14-0002"tab in the working binder). Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016. Page 6 Exhibit "B" Agenda bill/staff report dated October 19, 2016. CPA14-0002, for a change from "Single Family Residential" to "Light Commercial"for an approximately 2.27-acre parcel identified by parcel number 0520051045 for Romart Investments LLC. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 7 Exhibit "C" Colored Map as an excerpt of the City's Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Light Commercial" and "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 for Kana B. LLC. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA15-0002"tab in the working binder).. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 8 Exhibit "D" Agenda bill/staff report dated June 9, 2016. CPA 15-0002, for a change from "Light Commercial" and "Heavy Commercial" to "Light Industrial" for two parcels totaling approximately 5.9 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 3121059036 and 3121059033 for Kana B. LLC. Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 9 Exhibit E Colored map as an excerpt of "Comprehensive Plan", showing the change from "Light Industrial" and "Institutional" to "Heavy Commercial" for three parcels identified by Parcel Nos. 2421049004, 2421049114 and 24210.49115. Please see "Comp. Plan Map Arnendtnents" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 10 Exhibit "F" The Auburn, Dieringer, Federal Way, and Kent School District Capital Facilities Plans City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan See "Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments" tab in the working binder) Ordinance No. 6632 November 30, 2016 Page 11 752.3 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet752.3 Notes CPA14-0002, Romart Inv. LLC 2015 Aerial Photograph Legend 376.20 1:4,514 eGIS Planning 1in =376 ft 10/23/2016Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Auburn City Limits Parcels Street Centerlines 1,504.7 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet1,504.7 Notes CPA14-0002, Romart Inv. LLC 2015 Aerial Photograph Parcel No. 0520101045 Legend 752.30 1:9,028 eGIS Planning 1in =752 ft 10/23/2016Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Auburn City Limits Parcels Street Centerlines LA KE TAPPS PKWY SE Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4819Printed On: 08/20/13 2016 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPM #2 0 40 80 120 160 200 FEET LAKE TAPPS PKWY SE 182NDAVEE9TH ST E Single-Family Residential Light Commercial Public and Quasi-Public Open Space Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Auburn City Limits Parcels EXISTING PROPOSED REQUEST TO PUBLISH ______________________________________________________________________________ ATTN: Legal Notice Account Representative Please publish in the Seattle Times on October 25, 2016. Send the bill for the cost of publishing to: City of Auburn City Clerk’s Office 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001-4998 An "Affidavit of Publication" is requested for this billing. Thank you. Please publish below the line only. _______________________________________________________________ City of Auburn Notice of Public Hearing The Planning Commission of the City of Auburn, Washington, will conduct a public hearing on November 9, 2016, at 7:00 P.M. in Annex Conference Room 2 located at 2nd floor, 1 East Main ST (Note room change) on the following: Amendments consists of those proposed to the Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) and those affecting plan Policies and Texts (P/T) as follows: 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (Case No. CPA16-0001, unless indicated) • P/T #1 – Auburn School District 2016-2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 • P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #4 – Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan 2. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments • CPM#2 – (Case No. CPA14-0002) Request by Romart Investments LLC to amend the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. The vacant property is located northwest of the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway SE and 182nd Avenue E (east of Lakeland Hills South area, at the southeast corner of the city). Parcel #: 0520101045 • CPM#4 – (Case No. CPA16-0002) City initiated request to amend the map designation of three parcels totaling approx. 144.6 acres from “light Industrial” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115 For citizens with speech, sight or hearing disabilities wishing to review documents pertaining to this hearing, should contact the City of Auburn within 10 calendar days prior to the meeting, as to the type of service or equipment needed. Each request will be considered individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources, and the financial ability of the City to provide the requested services or equipment. If you have further comments or questions related to this application, you may contact Planning Services Manager, Jeff Dixon, at (253) 804-5033. If you call or write, please reference the 2016 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. City of Auburn Notice of Public Hearing The Planning Commission of the City of Auburn, Washington, will conduct a public hearing on November 9, 2016, at 7:00 P.M. in Annex Conference Room 2 located at 2nd floor, 1 East Main ST (Note room change) on the following: Amendments consists of those proposed to the Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) and those affecting plan Policies and Texts (P/T) as follows: 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (Case No. CPA16-0001, unless indicated) • P/T #1 – Auburn School District 2016-2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 • P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #4 – Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan 2. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments • CPM#2 – (Case No. CPA14-0002) Request by Romart Investments LLC to amend the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. The vacant property is located northwest of the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway SE and 182nd Avenue E (east of Lakeland Hills South area, at the southeast corner of the city). Parcel #: 0520101045 • CPM#4 – (Case No. CPA16-0002) City initiated request to amend the map designation of three parcels totaling approx. 144.6 acres from “light Industrial” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115 For citizens with speech, sight or hearing disabilities wishing to review documents pertaining to this hearing, should contact the City of Auburn within 10 calendar days prior to the meeting, as to the type of service or equipment needed. Each request will be considered individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources, and the financial ability of the City to provide the requested services or equipment. If you have further comments or questions related to this application, you may contact Planning Services Manager, Jeff Dixon, at (253) 804-5033. If you call or write, please reference the 2016 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. City of Auburn Notice of Public Hearing The Planning Commission of the City of Auburn, Washington, will conduct a public hearing on November 9, 2016, at 7:00 P.M. in Annex Conference Room 2 located at 2nd floor, 1 East Main ST (Note room change) on the following: Amendments consists of those proposed to the Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) and those affecting plan Policies and Texts (P/T) as follows: 1. Annual Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (Case No. CPA16-0001, unless indicated) • P/T #1 – Auburn School District 2016-2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #2 – Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 • P/T #3 – Federal Way School District 2017 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #4 – Kent School District 2016/2017 – 2021/2022 Capital Facilities Plan • P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan; and Continued on next page 2. Annual Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments • CPM#2 – (Case No. CPA14-0002) Request by Romart Investments LLC to amend the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. The vacant property is located northwest of the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway SE and 182nd Avenue E (east of Lakeland Hills South area, at the southeast corner of the city). Parcel #: 0520101045. Continued on next page • CPM#4 – (Case No. CPA16-0002) City initiated request to amend the map designation of three parcels totaling approx. 144.6 acres from “light Industrial” and “Institutional” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115. If you have further comments or questions related to this application, you may contact Planning Services Manager, Jeff Dixon, at jdixon@auburnwa.gov or (253) 804-5033. If you call or write, please reference the 2016 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. For citizens with speech, sight or hearing disabilities wishing to review documents pertaining to this hearing, should contact the City of Auburn within 10 calendar days prior to the meeting, as to the type of service or equipment needed. Each request will be considered individually according to the type of request, the availability of resources, and the financial ability of the City to provide the requested services or equipment. AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 14 Agenda Subject CPA14-0002, Romart Investments LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: (See exhibit listing at the end of this report) Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to conduct public hearing and recommend to City Council approval of the Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from :Single Family Residential” to “Light Commercial”. APPLICANTS/OWNERS:V.E. Mahrt Romart Investments LLC 3919 Latona Ave NE Seattle, WA 98071 REQUEST: File No. CPA14-0002: CPM #2 Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan map designation of an approx. 2.27-acre parcel from the current designation of “Single Family Residential" to “Light Commercial”. LOCATION: The vacant site is located at northwest corner of the 182nd Avenue East & Lake Tapps Parkway East. Site is located within the NE ¼ of Section 5, Township 20 North, Range 5 East, W.M., Parcel # 0520051045 EXISTING ZONING: The zoning designation of the parcel is R5, Residential, Five Dwelling Units per acre. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & D Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: October 9, 2016 Item Number: Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 2 of 14 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: The comprehensive plan designation of the parcel is “Single Family Residential”. SEPA STATUS: A combined Notice of Application and Adoption of Existing Environment Document, a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) (File No SEP15-0022) adopting the Pierce County Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for a conditional use permit CP33-94), North Lake Tapps Center prepared for the construction of an 18,000 commercial building and 88 associated parking stalls on the southeastern 4.12 acre portion of an 11.78-acre parcel to be served by Bonney Lake Water and City of Auburn Sewer, located in the General Use Zone classification (Application Number 196781). The City observed a 15-day comment period and received comments from Pierce County Transportation and from Carolyn Anderson, a neighbor. The comment period ended August 3, 2016 and the appeal period ended August 24, 2106. There were no appeals. FINDINGS 1. The City of Auburn first-adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended in 1995. The Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually each year since generally for housekeeping items and for capital facilities plan coordination. 2. The City of Auburn adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) by Ordinance No. 6584 on December 14, 2015. 3. City Code Section 14.22, “Comprehensive Plan” provides the city’s laws for amending the Comprehensive Plan. Amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). 4. In 2014 the City received two privately initiated comprehensive Plan map amendment applications by the same applicant by the submittal deadline of Friday, June 6, 2014. Because these were submitted without the required environmental checklist application these map amendments were not processed with the set of amendments acted upon in 2014. The environmental checklist application was submitted in 2015 and a decision issued in 2016 in order to provide time to conduct the necessary environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). The proposed action required additional analysis, including a traffic impact analysis of the land use change, prior to a decision by the SEPA responsible official. 5. This staff report and recommendation describes and addresses the Comprehensive Plan map amendment by Romart Investments LLC received in 2014 and being processed in 2016. Other year 2016 City initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be addressed in separate staff reports. 6. Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 3 of 14 7. RCW 36.70A.130 (The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for annual amendments to locally adopted comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances as provided for in State law, such as sub-area plans or emergencies, Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year. The annual limitation and exceptions are also restated in city code at ACC 14.22.060. 8. The City of Auburn established a June 6, 2014 submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments for the year 2014 (map or policy/text amendments). Notice to the public of the filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, publication of a legal notice the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a notification list of potentially interested parties prior to the deadline in 2014. A similar notification process in advance of a deadline was completed for 2016. 9. A combined Notice of Application and Adoption of Existing Environment Document, a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) (File No SEP15-0022) adopting the Pierce County Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for a Conditional Use Permit (File # CP33-94), North Lake Tapps Center prepared for the construction of an 18,000 commercial building and 88 associated parking stalls on the southeastern 4.12 acre portion of an 11.78-acre parcel to be served by Bonney Lake Water and City of Auburn Sewer, located in the General Use Zone classification (Application Number 196781). The City observed a 15-day comment period and received comments from Pierce County Transportation and from Carolyn Anderson, a neighbor. The comment period ended August 3, 2016 and the appeal period ended August 24, 2106. There were no appeals. 10. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22 “Comprehensive Plan”, outlines the process for submittal of private initiated amendments and the processing of Comprehensive Plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 4 of 14 C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 11. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 12. Due to the scope and limited number of privately initiated policy/text changes, the optional process as provided in the city code for conducting a public open house was not implemented. 13. The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 9, 2016. Public notice was also mailed to property owners of record within 300 feet, posting on-site and on the city’s webpage. 14. The following report identifies comprehensive plan map amendment by Romart Investment LLC, scheduled for the Planning Commission’s November 9, 2016 public hearing with a staff recommendation. (Comp Plan Map Amendment) – Staff Analysis Background 1. The Applicant submitted a Comprehensive Plan map amendment application on June 6, 2014, before the year 2014 application submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments. 2. The application was submitted by V.E. Mahrt (“Bud”) who is identified as Managing Member of Romart Investments LLC, Property Owner. 3. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application, the Applicant also submitted a rezone application (File No. REZ14-0001 and subsequently submitted an environmental checklist application (File No. SEP15-0022). 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the comprehensive plan map designation of of an approximately 2.27 acre vacant parcel from the current designation of “:Single Family Residential” to “Light Commerical” Parcel No. 0520101045. Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 5 of 14 5. The related rezone application (File No. REZ14-0001) seeks to change the zoning designation of an approximately 2.27 acre vacant parcel from the currnet designaton of “R5, Residential, Five dwelling units per acre” to “C1, Light Commerical” Parcel No. 0520101045. 6. As indicated by the Applicant’s narrative statement submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of bringing the property to a commercial land use designation to ensure the ability for future commercial development. Pierce County Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) and a Conditional Use Permit (land use approval)(File No. CP33-94), for the development of North Lake Tapps Center for the construction of an 18,000 commercial building and 88 associated parking stalls on the southeastern 4.12 acre portion of an 11.78-acre parcel to be served by Bonney Lake Water and City of Auburn Sewer, located in the General Use Zone classification (Application Number 196781) in 2008. The property was annexed to the City of Auburn in 2005 while the vesting application was under review by Pierce County. The CUP was issued in 2008 and the Applicant continued to renew the Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with Pierce County and the City of Auburn, but the CUP expired in 2013. At annexation in the year 2005, the property was given a comprehensive plan designation of “Single Family Residential" and zoning designation that is now referred to as “R5, Residential Five Dwelling Units Per Acre”. 7. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning classification and current land uses of the sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site Single Family Residenial R5, Residential, Five dwelling units per acre Vacant North The BPA utility easement and property beyond is designated “Single Family Residenial” R5, Residential, Five dwelling units per acre Utiliy transmission corridor (Northwest Pipeline) and vacant land South Pierce County, Neighborhood Commerical Pierce County, NC, Neighborhood Commercial Single family residential East Pierce County, Rural 10 Pierce County, R-10, Rural 10 Gas station and strip commercial West The utility easement and property beyond is designated “Single Family Residenial” R5, Residential, Five dwelling units per acre Vacant Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 6 of 14 Vicinity Map ^ North Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 7 of 14 Process and Criteria for Requested Amendment 8. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the comprehensive plan map designation of of an approximately 2.27 acre vacant parcel from the current desigaiton of “:Single Family Residential” to “Light Commerical” 9. The property is a diagonal rectangle in shape and is vacant. The tax parcel No. 0520101045. 10. The east side of the site is bordered by a Pierce County roadway of 182nd Avenue East which is a two-lane north-south roadway with left turn lanes provided at major intersections and gravel shoulders. To the south the site is bordered by Lake Tapps Parkway SE, a City of Auburn “Principal Arterial” classified roadway. This street has two lanes in each direction with a center turn lane. The shoulders are usually curb, gutter and sidewalk. The site does not border any other roadway rights-of-way. On the diagonal, to the north and west is a public storm pond and Northwest Pipeline underground utility transmission corridor. The utility corridor appears to contain wetlands that extend on to the northern portion of the site. 11. The property is located within the Pierce County portion of the City of Auburn. It was annexed to the City in 2005 by Ordinance No. 5932. 12. The property rises slightly in the center to an elevation of approximaltey 544 feet and slopes down on all directions. The lowest portion of the site is near the northeast corner at an elevation of 534 feet and was previously identified by Pierce County as containing weltands. 13. As indicated by the Applicant in the narrative submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of changing the land use designation of the property to allow future development consistent with nearby properties. 14. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code provision: “ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. “ 15. The City code provides certain criteria for decisions for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 8 of 14 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region.” CONCLUSIONS 1. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. The Applications are vested to the Comprehensive Plan in effect prior to the adoption of substantially revised Comprehensive Plan adopted in December of 2015. The Comprehensive Plan contains policy guidance related to this application. Specifically, Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map, starting at Page 14-9 provides the following purpose and description of the ‘Light Commercial’ Comprehensive Plan designation. The 2015 and earlier Comprehensive Plan to which the application is vested provides the following purpose statement of the “Light Commercial” comprehensive plan land use designation. “Light Commercial” “Purpose: To create people oriented commercial areas to supply a wide range of general commercial services to area residents.” “Description: This category represents the prime commercial designation for small to moderate scale commercial activities. These commercial areas should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian oriented activities. The ambiance of such areas should encourage leisure shopping and should provide amenities conducive to attracting shoppers.” (Emphasis added) “Compatible Uses: A wide range of consumer oriented goods and services are compatible within this designation since the emphasis would be on performance criteria which create an attractive shopping environment. However, uses which rely on direct access by vehicles or involve heavy truck traffic (other than for merchandise delivery) are not appropriate in this category. Unsightly outdoor storage and similar activities should be prohibited. Permitted uses would consist of retail trade, offices, personal services, indoor eating establishments, financial institutions, governmental offices, and similar uses. Multiple family dwellings should be encouraged as part of mixed-use developments where they do not interfere with the shopping character of the area, such as within the upper stories of buildings. Since taverns can break up the continuity of people oriented areas, taverns would be permitted generally only as a conditional use. Drive in windows should only be allowed as ancillary to a permitted use, and only when carefully sited under the conditional use permit process in order to ensure that an area's pedestrian environment is not seriously affected.” Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 9 of 14 “Criteria for Designation: This designation should include moderate sized shopping centers, and centrally located shopping areas. This designation should be preferred for commercial sites where visual and pedestrian amenities are an important concern outside of the downtown.” “Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Commercial areas which can not be readily separated from high traffic volumes (such as shallow lots along busy arterials) should not be included in this designation. Areas not large enough for separation from any adjacent heavier commercial or industrial area should not be designated as light commercial.” “Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the C-1 Light Commercial District. This district provides for a wide range of small and moderate scale commercial oriented towards the leisure shopper and pedestrian oriented activities.” (Emphasis added) While the purpose statement is not a perfect fit to this request, the request is sought for the purpose of creating a small to moderate scale commercial activities that can provide services and retailing products that serve an adjacent residential area. Currently, sidewalk exists along Lake Tapps Parkway connecting to nearby neighborhoods. Per ACC 18.23.020 C the stated purpose of the “Light Commercial” zone is as follows: “C. C-1, Light Commercial Zone. The C-1 zone is intended for lower intensity commercial adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This zone generally serves as a transition zone between higher and lower intensity land uses, providing retail and professional services. This zone represents the primary commercial designation for small- to moderate-scale commercial activities compatible by having similar performance standards and should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian-oriented activities. This zone encourages leisure shopping and provides amenities conducive to attracting shoppers and pedestrians.” Per the zoning code section, ACC 18.07.010.D, the stated intent of the “R5, Residential” zoning district is to: “D. R-5 Residential Zone – Five Dwelling Units per Acre. The R-5 single-family residential zones are intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single-family dwellings. It is further intended to achieve development densities of four to five dwelling units per net acre. This zone will provide for the development of single-family detached dwellings and for such accessory uses as are related, incidental and not detrimental to the single-family residential environment.” . As identified in ACC 18.07.010 the “R5, Residential” zoning distict is intended to create a living environment of optimum standards for single-family dwellings. The property configuration of a triangular-rectangle shape bordering two transportation corridors and up against a utility corridor and storm pond on the remaining sides and does not represent ideal living environment for single family dwellings. The property has remained undeveloped under the City’s residential zoning classification since the Pierce County Conditional Use Permit (Land use approval) expired June 30, 2013. The range of uses allowed in the light commercial zone are characterized by a greater variety of commercial businessese including retail and service. Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 10 of 14 Applicable policies from the City’s Comprehensive plan that are adopted and designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition or deny proposed action are noted as follows: “While commercial uses along arterials (often called "strip commercial" development) provide important services to community residents, the proliferation of commercial uses along arterials raises several land use planning issues. On the negative side, strip commercial development creates traffic flow problems and conflict with adjacent land uses. Due to their "linear" nature, commercial strips result in a maximum area of contact between commercial uses and other land uses resulting in a high potential for land use conflicts. Poor visual character due to excessive signage and architectural styles designed to attract attention instead of promoting a sense of community is an additional concern. Pedestrian shopping is made difficult, resulting in greater generation of automobile traffic, and large fields of asphalt parking lots are needed to accommodate single purpose vehicle trips.” “Despite the problems associated with commercial development along arterials, many such locations are often quite unsuitable for other uses, due to the impacts associated with heavy traffic volumes. Also, many commercial uses thrive at such locations due to high visibility and accessibility. The Plan seeks to manage existing arterial commercial areas to take advantage of the accessibility they provide, while minimizing traffic and land use conflicts and improving their visual appearance through an enhanced design review process and development standards.” “Objective 9.3. To encourage the appropriate use of areas adjacent to heavily traveled arterials while minimizing land use and traffic conflicts by: 1. Managing the continued commercial development of existing commercial arterials in a manner which minimizes traffic and land use conflicts. 2. Conserving residential qualities along heavily traveled arterials which are not yet commercialized, by restricting commercial development to types which provide an appropriate buffer. 3. Protecting existing, viable residential areas along lesser-traveled arterials, from commercial development. 4. Concentrate population and employment growth within the eight key economic development strategy areas within the City identified as follows: • Auburn Way North Corridor • Auburn Way South Corridor • Urban Center • Auburn Environmental Park and Green Zone • 15th Street SW/C Street SW/West Valley Highway/Supermall • A Street SE Corridor • SE 312th Street/124th Avenue SE Corridor • M Street SE between Auburn Way North and Auburn Way South. Policies: Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 11 of 14 LU-58 The City has identified those existing commercial arterials that are appropriate for continued commercial development and employment growth as well as a concentration of population growth. These areas are identified as the eight economic development strategy areas as identified under Objective 9.3. Sub-area plans for these strategy areas should be developed. LU-59 The City shall review its standards relating to the number, size and location of driveways to ensure consistency with goals and policies relating to arterial commercial development. LU-60 The City shall encourage the grouping of individual commercial enterprises along commercial arterials to promote the sharing of parking areas, access drives and signs. Such grouping can be encouraged through land division regulations, sign regulations and development standards. LU-61 Moderate density multiple family residential development shall be used to buffer general (heavy) commercial arterial development from single family development. Extensive screening and landscaping shall be used to buffer general commercial uses from multiple family uses. However, the placement of walls and fences and site designs which prevent easy access by bicyclists and pedestrians should be avoided. LU-62 Arterials experiencing strong pressure for commercial development, but not yet committed to commercial uses, shall be designated for mixed use commercial and high density multi-family uses. Development regulations should encourage the development of professional office and similar uses and multiple family housing, with development and design standards carefully drawn to ensure preservation of a quality living environment in adjacent neighborhoods. LU-63 Residential arterials having good potential for long term maintenance of a quality living environment should be protected from the intrusion of commercial uses. In some instances, these may be appropriate locations for churches and other religious institutions, or moderate density multiple family uses. LU-64 Newly developed arterials shall incorporate design features, and development of adjacent land shall be managed such that creation of new commercial strips is avoided. Land division regulations shall result in single family residences being oriented away from the arterial, with access provided by a non-arterial street. LU-65 Along the Auburn Way South Corridor, employment and population growth should be limited to north of the R Street SE overpass. LU-66 The City should develop design standards and guidelines f or development along arterials to improve their visual appearance. While the property that is the subject of this request is not specifically identified as a location targeted for commercial development by the language of the polciies and objectives, it is located at the intersection of major streets and separated from adjacent residential zoned property by the utility transmission corridor, storm pond and wetlands. Consistent with this discussion in the Comprehensive Plan, the subject property is adjacent to a highly visible transportation corridor that forms a visual identify for the city. Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 12 of 14 The property is sufficiently separated from single family residential uses and not likely to contribute to undesirable strip commercial. Future driveway access to the Pierce County roadway of 182nd Avenue East will require careful coordination with Pierce County Transporation as the jurisidcation owning the road. The coordiatnion will occur during construction authorizations. Concern about sufficient driveway separation from the intersecton for safety was previously identified by Pierce County’s in their SEPA decision (Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance). 2. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. The proposed application for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning has been reviewed by Valley Regional Fire Agency and the City Utilities and Traffic divisions. Based in these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the city, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. So, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements would be required to support the development. As noted above, future driveway access to the Pierce County roadway of 182nd Avenue East will require careful coordination with Pierce County Transporation as the jurisidcation owning the road. Half -street improvements would likely be required as well as the concern about sufficient driveway separation from the intersecton was identified in Pierce County’s previous SEPA decision (Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance). Pierce county also previously issed a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) (land use approval) for a smaller commercial development of the site. The CUP was extended several time but expired on June 30, 2013. 3. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the “Single Family Residential” land use designation was established in 2005 when the property as part of larger area that was annexed to the City of Auburn. A storm pond was subsequently constructed to the west side of the property and Lake Tapps Parkway SE widened. There also have has been further in-fill development of nearby single family subidivisons and commercial development within the Lakeland Hills South Planned Unit Development since the time of annexation. 4. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. There has been both “change” and a “lack of change”. The “change” is described above in response to the the development that has occurred in the intevenign time since annexation. The “lack of change” in conditions that generates the need for the amendment is that the pattern of “Light Commercial”-designated parcels and the appropriate land use designation of the property has not been revisited for many years. The map change is requested for property that Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 13 of 14 is effectively surrounded by roadways and utility corridors that provides boundaries that reduce potential for land use conflicts. 5. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and Pierce County and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The proposal is consistent because it provides land suitable for commercial development and municipal revenue. 6. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. While it may not be an error or oversight, the land use designation applied to the property at the time of annexation did not take into account the fact that Pierce County had a vested application being processed for a Conditional Use Permit (CP33-94), for the development of the site as “”North Tapps Center”. The development proposal consisted of construct an 18,000 square foot commercial building and 88 associated parking stalls on the southeastern 4.12-acre portion of an 11.78 acre parcel to be served by City of Bonney Lake Water and City of Auburn Sanitary Sewer, located in a General Use zone classification. The Conditional Use Permit was issued by Pierce County in 2008 and was renewed by the Applcant until June 30, 2013, when it expired. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council approval of the Romart Investment LLC (CPA14-0002) request for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the map designation of an approximately 2.27-acre parcel (Parcel # 0520051045 from “Single Family Residential” to “Light Commercial”. EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Vicinity Map Exhibit 3 Completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Form and materials including Applicant’s Narrative Statement, Exhibit 4 Combined Notice of Application and adoption of Pierce County Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance SEP15-0022 Exhibit 5 Notice of Public Hearing Agenda Subject: CPA14-0002 Romart Investment LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: October 19, 2016 Page 14 of 14 Exhibit 6 Affidavit of publication Exhibit 7 Affidavit of Mailing Exhibit 8 Affidavit of Posting AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 15 Agenda Subject CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Department: Community Development and Public Works Dept. Attachments: See separate map amendment and policy/text amendment sections of binder Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to recommend to City Council approval of 2016 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Map and Policy/Text Amendments. Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). This year the city is initiating: • One map amendment and • Five policy/text amendments. In addition, the city received in prior years two privately-initiated plan map amendments that will be processed this year and addressed under separate staff reports. The City received no map or text amendments this year by the submittal deadline of June 3, 2016. This staff report and recommendation addresses Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments CPM # 4 (File # CPA16-0002) (CPM #1, CPM #2, and CPM #3 are privately-initiated amendments and are considered separately) and Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments P/T # 1 through # 5. Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & Dev. Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: November 9, 2016 Item Number: Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 2 of 15 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA compliant comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances provided for in State law and repeated in City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 3, 2016 deadline for the submittal of privately-initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list in May 2016. The City received no privately-initiated plan map or policy/text amendments by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are referenced in the Capital Facilities, of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared individually by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by state law. 5. The City conducted the environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for City’s Capital Facilities Plan (PT #5 Policy/Text Amendment). This resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments on September 28, 2016 (City File # SEP16-0010). The comment period ended October 13, 2016 and the appeal period ended October 28, 2018. The City received not comments or appeals. 6. The City conducted the environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for City’s Map Amendment (CPM #4). This resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment on October 3, 2016 (City File # SEP16-0018). The comment period ended October 18, 2016 and the appeal period ended November 1, 2016. The City received not comments or appeals. 7. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately-initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 3 of 15 b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 8. Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. 9. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 10. Due to the nature and limited number of the city-initiated amendments and the scope and limited number of privately initiated policy/text changes, the optional process as provided in the city code for staff to hold a public open house was not held. 11. The public hearing notice was published on October 25, 2016 in the Seattle Times which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 9, 2016. 12. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) and Policy/Text (P/T) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s November 9, 2016 public hearing with a staff recommendation. Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 4 of 15 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments CPM #1 (Privately initiated map amendment to be considered separately. Public hearing on CPA15-0002, Kana B LLC was conducted by the Planning Commission on June 21, 2016. No further Planning Commission action required.) CPM #2 (Privately initiated map amendment CPA14-0002 Romart Investments LLC to be considered separately.) CPM #3 (Privately initiated map amendment CPA14-0003. Romart Investments LLC was to be considered separately. Applicant has withdrawn request. No further Planning Commission action required.) CPM #4 (CPA16-0002) Amend the Official Comprehensive Plan Map for a City-initiated change to the designation of three parcels totaling approximately 144.7 acres from “light Industrial” and “Institutional” to “Heavy Commercial”. This change is proposed in anticipation of US Government, General Services Administration (GSA’s) stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which is anticipated to result in a reduced need for land and possible disposal (sale) of a portion of the approx. 135 acres. Request also includes two adjacent City-owned parcels 1.56 acres and 8.04 acres to the south of GSA Properties. All the properties are generally located at southwest corner of C ST SW and 15th ST SW. Parcels are 2421049004, 2521049114 & 2521049115 Discussion 1. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning designation and land uses of the 3 sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site Light Industrial (GSA) & Institutional (City) M1, Light Industrial The GSA property contains government offices, warehouses & daycare. The City property contains a satellite fire station North Institutional and Heavy Industrial P1, Public and M2, Heavy Industrial Across 15th ST SW Municipal Park School District Bus Center South Heavy Industrial M2, Heavy Industrial Airplane Manufacturing Plant and Grocery Store Distribution Center East Light Industrial (Rail Yard Special Planning Area) M1, Light Industrial Across C ST SW, Railroad yard West Heavy Industrial M2, Heavy Industrial Airplane Manufacturing Plant Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 5 of 15 Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 6 of 15 2. This city-initiated proposal consists of changing the designation of the following three contiguous properties: • North Parcel # 2421049004, 134.49 acres owned by US Government administered by General Services Administration • Southwest Parcel # 2521049114, 8.7 acres owned by City of Auburn (Fire Station) • Southeast Parcel # 2521049115, 1.56 acres owned by City of Auburn (Access) The combined area of the three subject parcels is approximately 144.76 acres. 3. All three sites border C ST SW , which is “Minor Arterial” classified street which is developed with two lanes in each direction aligned north-south. The largest parcel (Parcel # 2421049004) also borders 15th ST SW, aligned east-west, which is classified by the City as a “Principal Arterial” which prescribes a five-lane road with a minimum 87 feet of right-of-way. North of the parcels, the road has five lanes but varies in lane configuration and right-of-way width along its length. 4. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn. It was annexed to the City in 1958 by Ordinance No. 1226. 5. The properties are relatively flat with slight slope to the north and west. The southern portion of the site occurs at elevation 98 feet and 88 feet near the north end. Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 7 of 15 13. Historically, the comprehensive plan designation of the properties was “Heavy Industrial” as changed in 1987. Subsequently, the GSA property was changed to “Light Industrial”. The two City properties were changed to “Institutional” by the map adopted with the substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) by Ordinance No. 6584 on December 14, 2015. 14. The City of Auburn is proposing to change the land use designation of approximately 135 acres of land owned by the United States Government and is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) as well as the two adjacent properties owned by the City. GSA and/or the U.S. Government is not proposing the change. This change in land use designation is proposed in anticipation of GSA’s stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which will likely result in a reduced need for land and the possibility of a U.S. Government disposal of a portion of the 135 acres. City of Auburn staff is recommending the Comprehensive Plan land use designation be changed to facilitate higher and better uses than the current “Light Industrial” designation offers. Staff is proposing that the land use designation be changed to Heavy Commercial”. 15. Staff is proposing the change in anticipation of the U.S. Government disposing of land so that the City can promote redevelopment that generates sales tax revenues, family wage jobs, and promotes economic development. The range of uses allowed in the “Heavy Commercial” designation is better suited to accomplish these goals than the “Light Industrial” designation. 16. Because changing the comprehensive plan map designation can only occur once per year, except under specific limitations, staff is seeking the change now because the annual amendment limitation does now allow us to respond quickly in the event that U.S. Government initiates the disposal process. 17. The U.S. Government has not provided the City with a long-term development or redevelopment plan. GSA has indicated that to maintain their mission of service delivery for the Northwest region, they plan to continue at their current location at this time. GSA has also indicated its land utilization needs will likely change, resulting in a reduction of land/space. 18. Staff has notified the U.S. Government of its intentions to seek a land use designation change. The U.S. Government has not indicated that they have objection or concern over the change so long as the underlying designation can also serve their long term needs in the event that it is determined that they are obligated to comply with local land use regulations. 19. The U.S. Government representatives have indicated that they are supportive of local efforts that promote economic development and that create jobs and that they would like to be viewed as a partner in accomplishing these objective. 20. The two City parcels are proposed to be changed from “Institutional” to “Heavy Commercial” since a majority of the city parcels were originally acquired from GSA and the deeds are subject to a reversionary clause requiring that (l) The property be used and maintained for emergency management response, including fire purposes; and (2) the property not be sold, leased, mortgaged, assigned or otherwise disposed of except to another government agency for the same purpose. The change in designation provides the greatest flexibility Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 8 of 15 and can continue to be used for emergency management purpose under a revised designation. 21. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code provision: “ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. “ 22. The City code provides certain criteria for decisions for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region.” CONCLUSIONS While the criteria of the code section ACC 14.22.110 may not apply to circumstances where Comprehensive Plan map changes are initiated by the city and therefore there is not an “Applicant”, to assist the Planning Commission the staff report provides the following analysis of conformance to the criteria: 1. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. This proposal is not vested to the earlier Comprehensive Plan in effect prior to the adoption of substantially revised Comprehensive Plan adopted in December of 2015. Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 9 of 15 The 2015 Comprehensive Plan contains policy guidance related to this application. Specifically, the Land Use Element at Page 14, provides the following description and polices of the ‘Heavy Commercial’ Comprehensive Plan designation. “Heavy Commercial” “Description - This category is intended to accommodate uses that would also accommodate a wide range of heavier commercial uses involving extensive storage or vehicular movement.” “Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed heavy commercial areas; or 2. Located along major arterial streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the Single Family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Heavy Commercial designation. Implementing Zoning Designations” “Heavy Commercial: All Heavy Commercial designated land not located within the Northeast Auburn Special Planning Area or located within the Northeast Auburn Special Planning Area, but incapable of meeting the C-MU zoning requirements.” “Policies Policy LU-69. A wide variety of commercial services oriented are appropriate within this category. This includes, but is not limited to regional scale retail and entertainment uses, commercial uses with outdoor sales areas, drive-in restaurant or other drive in commercial businesses, and commercial services with outdoor storage as an accessory use.” “Policy LU-70. Parking lots must be located and designed in a manner that softens their appearance from adjacent public roads. This is accomplished through landscaping, pedestrian spaces, and the location of buildings on the property. Where practicable, low impact development techniques and landscaping should be used to promote on site stormwater infiltration and shading of hard surfaces. Minimum and maximum parking ratios must be established for each type of permitted use.” “Policy LU-71. Development incentives should be established that encourage the creation of electric car charging stations, use of sustainable building and/or operational practices, development of non-motorized infrastructure, and proximity and connection to public transit.” Also, the City’s Economic Development Element of the Comprehensive Plan, at Page 4 contains relevant goals and policies, as follows: “GOAL 17. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT “To ensure the long-term economic health of the City and the region through a diversified economic base that supports a wide range of employment opportunities for Auburn's residents and those of the region and through the promotion of quality industrial and commercial development which matches the aspirations of the community. Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 10 of 15 “Objective 9.1. Promote a diversified economic base capable of withstanding changes in interest rates, inflation, tax structure and market conditions.” “ED-1 City promotion of new industry shall be directed at attracting business that diversifies the City’s tax base, offers secure, quality employment opportunities, is sensitive to community values and promotes the development of attractive facilities.” “Objective 9.2. Produce commercial and industrial siting policies which are based on the assessment of local needs and the availability of transportation and other infrastructure required to serve it.” “ED-4 Development of industrial areas should be based on performance standards appropriate for the site and with appropriate flexibility within those standards to accommodate changing market conditions.” “ED-5 Revitalize depreciated and/or obsolete commercial and industrial sites through innovative regulations that redesign the site in accordance with modern design standards and industrial/commercial uses.” “ED-6 Uses which serve regional needs and purposes (such as major industrial plants) must be separated from community serving uses in order to minimize traffic and other conflicts.” “Objective 9.3. Develop effective land use polices and economic development strategies that provide long-term and stable employment, increase per capita income and reduce the tax burden of Auburn residents.” “ED-15 Warehouse and distribution land uses are not a preferred long-term economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas in the City due to the loss of sales tax revenue associated with the State’s implementation of streamlined sales tax legislation in 2008, no substantive contribution to an increase in per capita income for Auburn residents, no reduction in the tax burden of Auburn residents, low employment densities, lower property values and land use inefficiencies.” “ED-16 Increases in manufacturing and industrial land uses should be the City’s preferred economic development and land use priority for industrial zoned areas of the City currently dominated by warehouse and distribution land uses. The City should promote and incentivize new manufacturing and light industrial uses and the gradual conversion of existing warehouse and distribution land uses to manufacturing and industrial land uses.” “ED-17 To support continued sales tax revenue growth opportunities in the City, those areas currently dominated by existing and warehouse land uses that abut existing commercial retail areas and could take advantage of this proximity to realize substantive value by changing to commercial retail uses should be considered for changes in comprehensive plan and zoning designations that would facilitate the conversion of these properties to commercial retail land uses.” “ED-19 Support workforce development programs to help all Auburn residents find stable, well-paying employment in a wide range of industries.” “Objective 9.5 Utilize the City’s unique environmental opportunities and planned infrastructure to build on and support economic development efforts.” Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 11 of 15 The change is consistent with the description statement since it diversifies the range of uses that can be allowed on the sites. The range of uses allowed in the Heavy Commercial zone are characterized by a greater variety of commercial businesses including retail and service. The sites are served by existing arterial streets and separated from residential uses by the rail yard. 2. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the city, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. So, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements would be required to support the development. 3. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the “Light Industrial” and “Institutional” designations of the three properties were based on pre-existing development patterns dating from the 1960’s and the land utilization needs of the federal government. The change in land use designation is proposed in anticipation of GSA’s stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which will likely result in a reduced need for land and the possibility of a U.S. Government disposal of a portion of the 135 acres. 4. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. The “Light Industrial” and “Institutional” designation of the three properties were based on pre-existing development patterns from the 1960’s and the land utilization needs of the federal government. This change in land use designation is proposed in anticipation of GSA’s stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which will likely result in a reduced need for land and the possibility of a U.S. Government disposal of a portion of the 135 acres. 5. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and Pierce County and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The proposal is consistent because it provides land suitable for commercial development and municipal revenue. Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 12 of 15 6. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. The “Light Industrial” and “Institutional” designation of the three properties were based on pre-existing development patterns dating from the 1960’s and the land utilization needs of the property owner, the federal government. This change in land use designation is proposed in anticipation of GSA’s stated intent to reconfigure their current facility, which will likely result in a reduced need for land and the possible U.S. Government disposal of a portion of the 135 acres. This constitutes a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council of the City-initiated change to the map designation of three parcels totaling approximately 144.7 acres from “light Industrial” and “Institutional” to “Heavy Commercial” (CPA16-0002). Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments P/T #1 Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022, adopted by School Board June 13, 2016 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2016-2022. The CFP was adopted by the Auburn School District School Board on June 13, 2016 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,469.37, an increase of $138.37 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $1,639.70, a decrease of $985.31. The actual impact fee that is assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council of the Auburn School District updated Capital Facilities Plan Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 13 of 15 P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 adopted July 25, 2016 by the School Board as part of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2017 - 2022. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on July 25, 2016. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is not requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to remain $3,330.00, and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is proposed to remain at $1,518.00. The actual impact fee assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council of the Dieringer School District updated Capital Facilities Plan P/T #3 Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan 2017 adopted June 14, 2016 by the School Board into the City Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board on June 14, 2016. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,198.00, representing an increase of $299.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $8,386.00, an increase of $7,880.00. The actual impact fee assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council of the Federal Way School District updated Capital Facilities Plan P/T #4 Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2017 to 2021-2022 adopted May 14, 2016 by the School Board into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 14 of 15 The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2016-2017 to 2021-2022 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on May 14, 2016 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non Significance (DNS). Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is incorporation of the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fees. The Plan indicates the net fee obligation for single-family dwellings of $5,100.00, representing an increase of $110.00, and for multi-family dwellings a fee of $2,210.00, representing an increase of $47.00. The actual impact fee that is assessed is set by ordinance by the Auburn City Council. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council Kent School District updated Capital Facilities Plan. CPM #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA states the following: A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element. A capital facility is a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long-lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting Agenda Subject: CPA16-0001 & CPA16-0002, 2016 Comprehensive Plan Amendments – City Initiated Plan Map Amendments and Policy/Text Amendments Date: October 20, 2016 Page 15 of 15 systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The memo from the Finance Department contained in the working notebook identifies the major changes in the CFP from last year. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022 is incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval to the City Council of the City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan 2017-2022. TERRACEVIEWLNSEEASTVALLEYHWYEASTSEInformation shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4728Printed On: 03/08/16 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPA15-0002 0 80 160 240 320 400 FEETTERRACEVIEWLNSEEASTVALLEYHWYEASTSEExisting Land Use Proposed Land Use Land Use Designations Residential Conservency Single-Family Residential Moderate Density Residential High Density Residential Office Residential Neighborhood Commercial Light Commercial Heavy Commercial Downtown Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Public and Quasi-Public Open Space Auburn City Limits Parcels EX ISTIN G PROPOSED AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Page 1 of 14 Agenda Subject CPA15-0002, Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Department: Community Development & Public Works Attachments: (See exhibit listing at the end of this report) Budget Impact: N/A Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to conduct public hearing and recommend to City Council approval of the Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. APPLICANTS/OWNERS: Jon Cheetham, Managing Member Kana B LLC (a.k.a. Lakeridge Paving Company) P.O. Box 8500 Kent, WA 98042 AGENT: Mary Urback 12417 12th Street East Edgewood, WA 98372 REQUEST: File No. CPA15-0002: CPM #1 Request to amend the map comprehensive plan map designation of the northern 2 of 4 parcels under the same ownership totaling approximately 5.9 acres from the current designation of “Light Commercial” to “Light Industrial” to allow a change in the zoning designation to correspond. The Applicant identifies that this is a non-project action. LOCATION: The proposal consists of parcels on the east side of East Valley Highway (A ST SE) in the 54XX-56XX block (between Lakeland Hills Boulevard and Lake Tapps Parkway East. The northern two parcels; 3121059036 - 2.33 acres & 3121059033 – 1.32 acres are within the southwest ¼ of the SW ¼ Section 31, T21N, R5E, WM. EXISTING ZONING: The zoning designation of the northern 2 parcels zoning designation is C1, Light Commercial. Reviewed by Council & Committees: Reviewed by Departments & Divisions: Arts Commission COUNCIL COMMITTEES: Building M&O Airport Finance Cemetery Mayor Hearing Examiner Municipal Services Finance Parks Human Services Planning & D Fire Planning Park Board Public Works Legal Police Planning Comm. Other Public Works Human Resources Action: Committee Approval: Yes No Council Approval: Yes No Call for Public Hearing ___/___/____ Referred to _________________________________ Until ____/___/____ Tabled ______________________________________ Until ___/___/____ Councilmember: Staff: Dixon Meeting Date: June 21, 2016 Item Number: Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 2 of 14 EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: The comprehensive plan designation of the northern 2 parcels is “Light Commercial”. SEPA STATUS: A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) was issued under city file SEP15-0019 on April 18, 2016. The comment period ended May 3, 2016 and the appeal period ended May 17, 2016. There were no comments or appeals. FINDINGS 1. The City of Auburn first-adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended in 1995. The Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually each year since generally for housekeeping items and for capital facilities plan coordination. 2. The City of Auburn adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) by Ordinance No. 6584 on December 14, 2015. 3. City Code Section 14.22, “Comprehensive Plan” provides the city’s laws for amending the Comprehensive Plan. Amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). 4. In 2015 the City received two privately initiated comprehensive Plan map amendment by the submittal deadline of Friday, June 5, 2015. These map amendments were not processed with the set of amendments acted upon in 2015, in order to provide time to conduct the necessary environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Both projects required additional analysis, such as traffic impacts of the land use change, prior to a decision by the SEPA responsible official. 5. This staff report and recommendation describes and addresses Comprehensive Plan map amendment by Kana B LLC. The other private initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment applications received in 2015 as well as, the year 2016 City initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments will be addressed in subsequent separate staff reports. 6. Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. 7. RCW 36.70A.130 (The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for annual amendments to locally adopted comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances as provided for in State law, Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year. The annual limitation and exceptions are also restated in city code at ACC 14.22.060. 8. The City of Auburn established a June 5, 2015 submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments for the year 2015 (map or policy/text amendments). Notice to the public of the filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, publication of a legal notice the Seattle Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 3 of 14 Times Newspaper, and sent to a notification list of potentially interested parties. The same notification has been completed for 2016. 9. A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) the environmental review decision required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for the application by Kana B. LLC for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone was issued under city file SEP15-0019 on April 18, 2016. The comment period ended May 3, 2016 and the appeal period ended May 17, 2016. There were no comments or appeals 10. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22 “Comprehensive Plan”, outlines the process for submittal of private initiated amendments and the processing of Comprehensive Plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 11. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 4 of 14 12. Due to the scope and limited number of privately initiated policy/text changes, the optional process as provided in the city code for a public open house was not conducted. 13. The public hearing notice was published on June 10, 2016 in the Seattle Times at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for June 21, 2016. Public notice was also mailed to property owners of record within 300 feet, posting on-site and on the city’s webpage. 14. The following report identifies comprehensive plan map amendment by Kana B LLC, scheduled for the Planning Commission’s June 21, 2016 public hearing with a staff recommendation. (Comp Plan Map Amendment) – Staff Analysis Background 1. The Applicant submitted a Comprehensive Plan map amendment application on June 5, 2015, before the year 2015 application submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments. 2. The application was submitted by Mary J. Urback, Agent and Attorney for Jon Cheetham, Managing Member of Kana B LLC, Property Owner. Jon Cheetham and Greg O’Farrell are the managing members of Kana B Limited Liability Company (LLC). Jon Cheetham and Greg O’Farrell are the principals of Lakeridge Paving Company. 3. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application, the Applicants also submitted an environmental checklist application (File No. SEP15-0019) and a rezone application (File No. REZ15-0001). 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the comprehensive plan map designation of the northern 2 of 4 parcels (Parcel numbers 3121059036 & 3121059033) from the current designation of “Light Commercial” to “Light Industrial”. 5. The related rezone application (File No. REZ15-0001) seeks to change the zoning designation of the northern 2 parcels zoning designation from C1, Light Commercial to M1, Light Industrial and to change the southern 2 parcels under the same ownership (southern two parcels – Parcel No. 3121059056 & 13121059010) from C”3, Heavy Commercial” to “M1, Light Industrial” to correspond. The Applicant identifies in the environmental checklist application that this is a non-project action. 6. As indicated by the Applicant’s narrative statement submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of bringing the entirety of both properties under the same land use designation to ensure the ability for future redevelopment. Lakeridge Paving Company as lessee to Kana B LLC is a “construction contractor” business and has plans for further development of the site to include a future office building and a future building for storage of construction equipment and vehicles. While certain further future development of the southern two parcels is capable of being done under the existing C3, Heavy Commercial zoning designation in effect (office uses and parking structures are allowed) it is complicated by being subject to different use limitations and zoning development standards. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 5 of 14 7. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning classification and current land uses of the sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use On-Site Light Commercial C1, Light Commercial Single family house and outbuildings and temporary storage of unoccupied buildings North “Light Commercial” C1, Light Commercial Single family residence South “Light Industrial” for the two parcels owned by the subject Applicant with “Light Commercial” designated properties, located beyond C1, Light Commercial The two parcels owned by the subject Applicant are mostly vacant. The properties beyond contain a heavy construction contractor business East “Moderate Density Residential l” R7, Residential Seven Dwelling Units Per Acre. Steep undeveloped hillside West East Valley Highway (A ST SE) , railroad line and City limits with City of Pacific, beyond East Valley Highway (A ST SE) , railroad line and City limits RO zoned property located in the City of Pacific, beyond ” East Valley Highway (A ST SE), railroad line and agricultural property, beyond in the City of Pacific. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 6 of 14 ^ North Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 7 of 14 Process and Criteria for Requested Amendment 8. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the designation of two adjacent parcels; two of the four parcels owned by the applicants. The northernmost parcel, Parcel #3121059033 consists of 1.08 acres and next parcel, Parcel #3121059036 consists of 1.14 acres. The two properties considered together are roughly rectangular in shape with the longer axis oriented north-south and measuring approximately 500 feet. 9. The northern property the northern property (Parcel #3121059033) contains a single family house. The southern property (Parcel # 3121059036) has recently had the single family residence removed. Unoccupied buildings have temporarily been stored on-site under a temporary use permit. 10. Both sites are bordered to the west by developed A ST SE (a.k.a. East Valley Highway) which is classified by the City as a “Principal Arterial” which prescribes a five-lane road with 87 feet of right-of-way. The adjacent street is not currently developed to the “Principal Arterial” street standard. The site does not border any other roadway rights-of-way. 11. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn. It was annexed to the City in 1962 by Ordinance No. 1492. 12. Based on historic zoning maps, the subject properties were zoned UNCL, Unclassified from the time of annexation up until 1987 and then were changed to the second category of residential zoning of R2, a Single Family Residential (6,000 square foot minimum lot size). The properties were subsequently changed to a “Light Commercial” comprehensive plan designation and a “C1, Light Commercial” zoning classification. 13. The two properties slope gently to the west at the base of the transition in grade from the western face of a steep hillside to the valley floor. 14. As indicated by the Applicants in the narrative submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of changing the land use designation of the property to ensure a consistent designation across each site for future redevelopment. 15. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the future zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code provision: “ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. “ 16. The City code provides certain criteria for decisions for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 8 of 14 A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region.” CONCLUSIONS 1. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. The Applications are vested to the Comprehensive Plan in effect prior to the adoption of substantially revised Comprehensive Plan adopted in December of 2015. The Comprehensive Plan contains policy guidance related to this application. Specifically, Chapter 14, Comprehensive Plan Map, starting at Page 14-14 provides the following purpose and description of the ‘Light Industrial’ Comprehensive Plan designation: The 2014 Comprehensive Plan to which the application is vested provides the following purpose statement of the “Light Industrial” comprehensive plan land use designation. “Light Industrial” “Purpose: To reserve quality industrial lands for activities that implement the City's economic development goals and policies.” “Description: This category is intended to accommodate a wide range of industrial and commercial uses. This designation is intended to provide a location attractive for manufacturing, processing and assembling land use activities that benef it from quality surroundings and appropriate commercial retail uses that benefit from the location, access, physical configuration, building types of these properties. It is distinguished from heavier industrial uses by means of performance criteria. All significant activities shall take place inside buildings, and the processing or storage of hazardous materials shall be strictly controlled and permitted only as an incidental part of another use. The siting and design of industrial buildings shall be of an "industrial or business park" character. Certain residential uses may be permitted, especially in industrial areas that have been established to promote a business park environment that complements environmental features, and/or if development standards are developed to promote Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 9 of 14 compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses.” (Emphasis added) “Compatible Uses: A wide range of industrial and heavy commercial uses may be permitted, subject to performance standards. These uses include indoor manufacturing, processing and assembling of materials from previously prepared or raw materials and ancillary and necessary warehousing and distribution of finished goods associated with manufacturing and industrial uses. Certain residential uses may be permitted if development standards are established to promote compatibility between residential and other non-residential land uses.” “Outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with adjacent uses and so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be extensively screened. In the Environmental Park District that implements the “Light Industrial” plan map designation; outdoor storage will be strictly limited to promote compatibility with adjacent environmental land uses. Uses involving substantial storage or processing of hazardous materials as well as substantial emissions should not be permitted in these areas. A wide range of commercial activities may be allowed to provide increased opportunities for sales tax revenue.” “To ensure the City’s long-term ability to invest in public infrastructure and services remains viable, the City will continue to assess, evaluate, and if necessary pursue implementation of policies that incentivize the transition of current and future land uses in its industrial zones away from distribution and warehouse uses based on future changes on tax structure at the State level or other similar actions. The City believes that manufacturing and industrial land uses are preferential to and should be encouraged over warehouse and distribution land uses currently existing in the City and that any future warehouse and distribution uses should be ancillary to and necessary for the conduct of manufacturing and industrial uses. Manufacturing and industrial uses are more appropriate and beneficial through higher and better use of the land, enhanced employment densities, increased property tax revenues and potential on-site sales tax revenue generation for receipt of materials and other goods and services.” “The establishment of regulations and incentives that create a basis for increased commercial retail uses in the City’s industrial zoning districts will provide greater opportunity for the generation of sales tax revenue in the City. Increased sales tax revenue will positively impact the City’s continued ability to maintain and operate a strong public investment program in infrastructure and services. Commercial retail uses will in turn be attracted to and benefit from the location, access, physical configuration and building types of industrial zoned properties.” “Criteria for Designation: This designation should be applied to a majority of the Region Serving Area designated under this Plan. It is particularly appropriate for industrial land within high visibility corridors. This category should separate heavy industrial areas from other uses.” “Considerations Against Applying this Designation: Within the Community Serving Area, this designation should only be applied to sites now developed as light industrial sites. Industrial sites along rail corridors are generally more appropriate for heavier industrial uses, unless in high visibility corridors.” Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 10 of 14 “Appropriate Implementation: This designation is implemented by the Light Industrial (M-1), Environmental Park (EP) or Business Park (BP) zone.” Per ACC 18.23.020 C the stated purpose of the “Light Commercial” zone is as follows: “C. C-1, Light Commercial Zone. The C-1 zone is intended for lower intensity commercial adjacent to residential neighborhoods. This zone generally serves as a transition zone between higher and lower intensity land uses, providing retail and professional services. This zone represents the primary commercial designation for small- to moderate-scale commercial activities compatible by having similar performance standards and should be developed in a manner which is consistent with and attracts pedestrian-oriented activities. This zone encourages leisure shopping and provides amenities conducive to attracting shoppers and pedestrians.” Per the zoning code section, ACC 18.23.020.G, the stated intent of the “M1, Light Industrial” zoning district is to: “. . accommodate a variety of industrial, commercial, and limited residential uses in an industrial park environment, to preserve land primarily for light industrial and commercial uses, to implement the economic goals of the comprehensive plan and to provide a greater flexibility within the zoning regulations for those uses which are non-nuisance in terms of air and water pollution, noise, vibration, glare or odor. The light industrial/commercial character of this zone is intended to address the way in which industrial and commercial uses are carried out rather than the actual types of products made. The character of this zone will limit the type of primary activities which may be conducted outside of enclosed buildings to outdoor displays and sales. Uses which are not customarily conducted indoors or involve hazardous materials are considered heavy industrial uses under this title and are not appropriate for the M-1 zone. An essential aspect of this zone is the need to maintain a quality of development that attracts rather than discourages further investment in light industrial and commercial development. Consequently, site activities which could distract from the visual quality of development of those areas, such as outdoor storage, should be strictly regulated within this zone.” As identified in ACC 18.23.030 the “M1, Light Industrial” zoning classification allows a wide range of uses. While primarily manufacturing and processing in concentration, the regulations also allow a wide variety of commercial and service oriented uses of a more intensive nature. The zoning development standards such as setbacks, building height, etc. of the zone are contained in ACC 18.23.040. As discussed above, the southerly 2 parcels have been re-designated as “Light Industrial” under the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Update. The 2 northerly parcels are contiguous with these two southerly parcels. Also, the parcels are contiguous to existing land uses that function as light industrial uses such as industrially zoned properties across A Street SE located outside of Auburn City limits to the west, and Rodarte Construction Company to the south. Additionally, along this segment of A Street SE and within a distance of a quarter mile, there are no other established land uses except for one remaining single family residence (SFR) and a church (other SFR’s are depicted on the property in relatively recent aerial photographs, but some have been removed by the Applicant). Included with the application are statements by real estate agents that indicate that the property is not conducive to commercial development and is better suited to industrial development. There are many factors that may lead to this opinion for Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 11 of 14 example; the market may not have reached maturity at this location that make the property suitable for redevelopment consistent with the commercial designation. The range of uses allowed in the light industrial zone are characterized by a greater amount of outdoor storage and outdoor activity and greater potential for noise and sharp transition in land use, regardless of the specific development arrangement and use. Without appropriate mitigation and design consideration, the proximity of the site to a heavily traveled “Principal Arterial” street corridor has the potential to result in land use and visual impacts to nearby properties and to the traveling public. The fact that the site rises in elevation approximately 15 feet and may be further filled to facilitate development increases the potential visibility of the site and future development. As well as, the location is at the south end of main transportation corridor at the perimeter, that forms a prominent visual identify for the City. The Comprehensive Plan description of the purpose of this designation emphasizes that outside storage shall be permitted only subject to performance criteria addressing its quantity and location to ensure it is compatible with adjacent uses and so that such storage would not detract from the potential use of the area for light industry. In all cases such storage shall be extensively screened. Applicable policies from the City’s Comprehensive plan that are adopted and designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under SEPA to approve, condition or deny proposed action are noted as follows: Objective 2.2. To provide flexibility for major new commercial or industrial developments to respond to changing market conditions without threatening the purposes of this Comprehensive Plan. GP-13 Ordinances regulating developing commercial or industrial areas should be based on performance standards which provide flexibility to respond to market conditions while ensuring compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan, and with present and potential adjacent uses. GP-14 Review procedures for all new development should be integrated or coordinated with SEPA as much as possible. GP-15 In interpreting plan provisions or in considering a plan amendment, plan designations in the Region Serving Area should be treated in a more flexible manner than in the Community Serving Area (see Map 3.2.). Objective 2.3. To provide flexibility in areas where a transition from existing uses to planned uses is appropriate. Policies: GP-16 Contract zoning can be used to manage the transition between existing uses and future uses. Contract zoning allows new uses to be conditioned in a manner which controls potential conflicts during such transition. Contract zoning may be particularly useful as a timing device to ensure that the necessary public facilities are available to support new development. GP-31 The City should appropriately support local businesses that enhance the image of the City through their contribution to economic vitality, educational, and historic value of the community. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 12 of 14 Objective 11.1. To create a physical image for the city conducive to attracting light industry. LU-96 Highly visible areas which tend to establish the image of the city should not be used by heavy industrial uses. LU-97 The City shall promote high quality development of all light industrial and warehouse areas. LU-98 The City shall aggressively seek to abate all potentially blighting influences in industrial areas, especially in areas visible to regional traffic flows and in areas designated for light industrial uses. Objective 11.2. To establish performance standards appropriate for developing industrial areas. LU-99 Compatibility among land uses should be enhanced through landscaping, building orientation and setbacks, traffic control and other measures to reduce potential conflicts. LU-100 All industrial development should incorporate aesthetically pleasing building and site design. The City shall amend its codes and performance standards which govern industrial development to implement this policy. a. Procedures shall be established to ensure aesthetically pleasing building and site design in areas designated for light industrial areas. b. Appropriate landscaping and site development standards shall regulate site development in heavy industrial areas. c. Unsightly views, such as heavy machinery, service entrances, storage areas, rooftop equipment, loading docks, and parking areas should be screened from view of adjacent retail, commercial, light industrial and residential areas and from public streets. Consistent with this discussion in the Comprehensive Plan, the subject properties are adjacent to a highly visible transportation corridor that forms a visual identify for the city. Also, with the recent change in the map designation of the two properties located to the south and under the same ownership, the properties border other property designated “Light Industrial” by the Comprehensive Plan. The site is separated by hillside from residential uses to the east. Residential uses continue to exist to the north on property designated for light commercial use. The site is not located in the regional-serving area. The development of the property will be required to be served with high capacity and high quality public services and facilities concurrent with development; these will include half street improvements and utility extensions. The properties have frontage and access to West Valley Hwy N that is classified as a “Principal Arterial” in the City’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The City’s comprehensive plan seeks to establish and maintain a balance of industrial uses that respond to local and regional needs while enhancing the city's image through optimal siting and location of light industrial uses. Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 13 of 14 2. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. The proposed application for a change in comprehensive plan designation and zoning has been reviewed by Valley Regional Fire Agency and the City Utilities and Traffic divisions. Based in these reviews, the change would not adversely affect the provision of services. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the city, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. So, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements would be required to support the development While the site is not yet developed consistent with city standards for the operation of a paving contractor business, Lakeridge Paving Company seeks to develop the site for a “construction contractor” business and has plans for further development of the southern lot to include a future office building and a future building for storage of vehicles. While this further future development is capable of being done under the C3, Heavy Commercial zoning classification (office uses and parking structures are allowed) it is complicated by being subject to different zoning development standards. The Applicant has recently submitted additional applications to the city for the future development of the site. These will be reviewed for consistency with city standards, including City Public Works Design Standards prior to authorization. 3. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the city has already changed the map designation to “Light Industrial” of two contiguous parcels off-site to the south and therefore making this requested change more logical as an expansion of the existing designation. However, this property owner’s parcels would be different in designation than all surrounding parcels. 4. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. There has been a lack of change in conditions that generates the need for the change. The pattern of “Light Commercial”-designated parcels has not been revisited for many years. The proposed change is for two parcels that are located adjacent to other parcels with the “Light Industrial” designation and provides more regular boundaries that reduce potential for land use conflicts. 5. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and “Vision 2040: Growth and Agenda Subject: CPA15-0002 Kana B LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Date: June 9, 2016 Page 14 of 14 Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The proposal is consistent because it provides land suitable for industrial development. 6. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. The same land use designation as proposed occurs on adjacent properties to the south and thus meets item b. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission to recommend to the City Council approval of the Kana B LLC (CPA15-0002) request for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the map designation of two parcels, Parcel Nos. 3121059036 - 2.33 acres & 3121059033 – 1.32 acres from “Light Commercial” to “Light Industrial”. EXHIBIT LIST Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Vicinity Map with amended 2015 map designations Exhibit 3 Completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Form and materials including Applicant’s Narrative Statement, Exhibit 4 Combined Notice of Application and Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance SEP15-0016 Exhibit 5 Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 6 Affidavit of publication Exhibit 7 Affidavit of Mailing Exhibit 8 Affidavit of Posting F ST SEC ST SE17TH ST SE 14TH ST SE GPLSEB ST SED ST SE26TH ST SE H ST SEELM LN SE 21ST ST SE 23RD ST SE 24TH ST SE C PL SE 17TH CT SE HSTSEJ CTSEESTSE31ST LN S E 26TH ST SEF CT SE19TH ST SE 27TH ST SE 16TH ST SE K ST SEH ST SEG ST SEH ST SEDPLSED ST SEB ST SE31ST ST SE 23RD PL SE15TH ST SE 24TH ST SE 18TH ST SE 20TH ST SE 19TH ST SE 13TH ST SE 14TH ST SE 24TH ST SE CEDAR DR SE 22ND ST SE 27TH ST SE 25TH ST SE 28TH ST SE 27TH ST SE 28TH ST SE BIRCH LN SE28TH ST SE DOGWOOD LN SEJ ST SEF ST SEG ST SEH ST SE23RD ST SE SKYLARKVILL A G E RD SEEAST BLVDPACIFICAVESCPLSEGSTSED ST SED ST SE26TH PL SEK ST SELSTSEH ST SEC ST SEC S T S ELSTSED ST SE21 ST PLSEC ST SEI ST SEH ST SEASPEN LN SEPERIMETER RD SWBOUNDARY BLVD SW ASTSE15TH ST SW A UBU R N W AY S C ST SWINDUSTRYDRSW29TH ST SEO ST SWInformation shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 4820Printed On: 08/20/13 2016 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Map CPM #4 0 260 520 780 1,040 1,300 FEETC ST SEF ST SE21ST ST SE 25TH ST SE 17TH ST SE ELM LN SE 14TH ST SE B ST SEGPLSED ST SE26TH ST SE H ST SEK ST SE23RD ST SE 24TH ST SE ESTSEC PL SE 17TH CT SE HSTSEJ CTSE31ST LN S EF CT SE19TH ST SE 16TH ST SE H ST SEDPLSEG ST SEH ST SED ST SEB ST SE31ST ST SE 28T H ST SE 23RD PL SE15TH ST SE 24TH ST SE 14TH ST SE 24TH ST SE CEDAR DR SE 22ND ST SE 27TH ST SE 28TH ST SE 27TH ST SE 28TH ST SE SKYLARK VILLAGE RDSEBIRCH LN SEJ ST SEF ST SEG ST SEH ST SEDOGWOOD LN SE23RD ST SE EAST BLVDPACIFICAVESCPLSED ST SED ST SEGSTSE26TH PL SEH ST SEC ST SEC S T S ED ST SE21ST PLSEC ST SEI ST SEH ST SEASPEN LN SEPERIMETER RD SW29TH ST SEC ST SWASTSEINDUSTRYDRSWBOUNDARY BLVD SW 15TH ST SW O ST SWInstitutional Single-Family Residential Moderate Density Residential High Density Residential Light Commercial Heavy Commercial Light Industrial Heavy Industrial Public and Quasi-Public Open Space Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use Auburn City Limits Parcels EXISTING PROPOSED Page 1 of 4 Memorandum To: Planning and Community Development From: Finance Department, Capital Projects Date: October 19, 2016 Re: DRAFT 6-Year Capital Facilities Plan (2017-2022) Attached is the copy of our 2017-2022 Draft Capital Facilities Plan (CFP), the capital facilities element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. For questions or additional information on the preparation of this document, please contact Consuelo Rogel at (253) 804-5023 or crogel@auburnwa.gov. Questions regarding specific projects contained in the document should be directed to the department managing the project(s). A capital facilities plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington’s Growth Management Act (GMA). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The attached CFP satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities Element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The following projects have been added, removed or revised from the previous year’s CFP (2016-2021) due to the creation of new projects, completion of projects or changes in project titles and/or priorities: Transportation Projects (see TIP for further details) Additions • Auburn Way South (SR-164) Sidewalk Improvements (page 53) • Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements (page 55) • BNSF & A St SE Pedestrian Crossing Improvements (page 61) • A Street Traffic Signal Improvements (page 65) • S 272nd & 277th St Corridor & Non-Motorized Trail Imp. (Envir. Monitoring) (page 73) • M Street SE Storm Improvements (page 78) Page 2 of 4 Transportation Projects Deletions • AWS Pedestrian Improvements (Dogwood St SE to Fir St SE) Project complete • Traffic Management Center Improvements Planned for completion in 2016 • W. Main St Multimodal Corridor & ITS Imp. Planned for completion in 2016 • AWS Corridor Imp. Fir St SE to Hemlock St SE Project complete • Auburn Ave NE & 3rd St NE Pedestrian & Access Imp. Project Title & Scope change to new project –Auburn Regional Growth Access Imp. • SR-18 to Auburn Way South (SR-164) Bypass Moved to future years beyond 2022 • 104th Ave SE & Green River Road Study Project complete • A St SE & 6th St SE Safety and Access Improvements Deleted due to project prioritization • Citywide Traffic Signals Safety Improvements Planned for completion in 2016 Water, Sewer, Storm Utilities Projects Additions • 22nd Street NE & I Street NE Intersection (Water, page 125) • Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Imp. (Water, page 126) • M Street NE Widening (Water, page 127 & Sewer page 155) • AWS –Hemlock St. SE to Academy Dr. SE (Water, page 128) • Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (Water, page 129) • Decommissioning Lea Hill Pump Station (Water, page 130) • Deduct Meter Replacement Program (Water, page 131) • Comprehensive Water Plan (Water, page 132) • Lea Hill AC Main Replacement (Water, page 133) • Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (Water, page 134) • Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (Water, page 135) • B Street NW Reconstruction (Sewer, page 141) • Pump Station Telemetry Improvements (Sewer, page 156) • S 330th St & 46th Pl S Storm Improvements (Storm, page 175) • Academy Drive, SE 312th St SE & D St SE Storm Imp. (Storm, page 177) • Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Storm, page 179) • S 314th St & 54th Ave S Storm Improvement Phase 1 (Storm, page 180) • S 314th St & 54th Ave S Storm Improvement Phase 2 (Storm, page 181) Page 3 of 4 Water, Sewer, Storm Utilities Projects Deletions • Intertie Booster Pump Station Improvements (Water) Deleted due to project prioritization • 24” White River Crossing (Water) Project title change (see Coal Creek Springs Transmission Replacement -page 120) • 30th St NE Area Flooding, Phase 2 (Storm) Planned for completion in 2016 • Mill Creek Wetland Restoration (Storm) Project complete • West Hill Annexation Area Drainage Imp. (Storm) Project Title & Scope change (see S 330th St & 46th Pl Storm Imp. -page 175) • Annual Citywide Storm Pipeline Repair & Replacement Project Title change (see Academy Drive, SE 312th St SE, & D St Se Storm Imp. -page177) Parks, Arts & Recreation Projects Additions • Brannan Park Synthetic Infield (page 192) • Mary Olson Farm –Watts Property Acquisition (page 193) • Lakeland Hills Nature Area (page 205) • Les Gove Restroom Facility (page 206) • Fulmer Park Playground Replacement (page 207) • Lakeland Hills Playground Replacement (page 208) • Game Farm Drainage Improvements (page 209) • Lea Hill Soccer Field Turf Replacement (page 210) • First Greens Surrounds Rebuild (page 211) • 10th Greens Surrounds Rebuild (page 212) • Fairway Drainage Improvement (page 213) • Chemical Storage Container (page 214) • Topdressing Sand Storage Cover Structure (page 215) • Les Gove Campus Security Cameras (page 216) Deletions • Isaac Evans Park Project complete • Auburn Community and Youth/Teen Center Project complete • Lakeland Park #4 Project Title change (see Lakeland Hills Nature Area -page 205) Page 4 of 4 Community Improvements / General Municipal Buildings Additions • Maintenance & Operations Master Planning (page 229) • Downtown Auburn Arts Center (page 230) • City Hall Exterior Structural Repairs (page 231) • City Hall Roof Replacement (page 232) • Wayfinding Program (page 245) • Citywide Bridge Railing Replacements (page 246) • Citywide Street Lighting Improvements (page 247) • Main Street Urban Design Improvements & Implementation (page 248) • City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration (page 330) Deletions • Council Chamber Remodel Planned for completion in 2016 • Purchase of King County Public Health Building Completed in 2016 • Downtown Wayfinding Program Project Title & Scope change (see Wayfinding Program –page 245) • Green River Park Design Planned for completion in 2016 Airport Additions • Jet A Fueling Facility (page 257) • Annual Repair and Replacement of Airport Facilities (page 258) • Asset Inventory and Condition Assessment (page 264) Deletions • Fuel Farm Project Title & Scope change (see Jet A Fueling Facility –page 257) • West Helicopter Parking Pads, Facilities and Access Road Moved to future years beyond 2022 City of Draft Auburn Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2017 – 2022) Adopted by Ordinance No. xxxx, December xx, 2016 as part of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan City of Auburn 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 931-3000 www.auburnwa.gov Cover Design: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2017 – 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 7 Statutory Requirement for Capital Facilities Elements ............................................................ 7 Concurrency and Level of Service .......................................................................................... 8 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 8 2. Goals and Policies 1. Capital Facilities Response to Growth .............................................................................. 11 2. Financial Feasibility .......................................................................................................... 11 3. Public Health and Environment ......................................................................................... 13 4. Consistency with Regional Planning ................................................................................. 13 3. Capital Improvements Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 15 Transportation ........................................................................................................................ 17 Arterial Street (102) Capital Projects ................................................................................. 22 Local Street (103) Capital Projects ................................................................................... 81 Street Preservation Fund (105) Capital Projects ............................................................... 83 Water...................................................................................................................................... 93 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................... 137 Storm Drainage ...................................................................................................................... 157 Parks, Arts and Recreation ..................................................................................................... 183 General Municipal Buildings ................................................................................................... 221 Community Improvements ...................................................................................................... 235 Airport..................................................................................................................................... 253 Cemetery ................................................................................................................................ 269 Police Department .................................................................................................................. 271 Valley Regional Fire Authority ................................................................................................ 273 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan City of Draft Auburn Capital Facilities Plan 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A capital facilities element is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington’s Growth Management Act (GMA). Capital facilities generally have long useful lives, significant costs and tend to not be mobile. The GMA requires that capital facilities elements include an inventory of existing capital facilities showing locations and capacities, a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities and at least a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The GMA also requires that the land use element be reassessed if probable funding falls short of existing needs. This document is the City’s six-year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP, in conjunction with other City adopted documents, satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities Element. It addresses one of the GMA’s basic tenets: to provide adequate facilities to support development in accordance with locally adopted level of service standards. This CFP will enable the City to: (1) make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars, and (2) make timely decisions about maintaining level of service in accordance with this CFP and other adopted plans. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT This CFP consists of the following: Chapter 1. Introduction Purpose of CFP, statutory requirements, methodology. Chapter 2. Goals and Policies Goals and policies related to the provision of capital facilities. Chapter 3. Capital Improvements Proposed capital projects, which include the financing plan and reconciliation of project capacity to level of service (LOS) standards. This CFP is a companion document to the Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan identifies the City’s planning approach and policy framework for the provision of capital facilities. This CFP provides the background inventory, identifies proposed projects and establishes the six-year capital facilities plan for financing capital facilities. The comprehensive plan contains timeframes which are the intended framework for future funding decisions and within which future actions and decisions are intended to occur. However, these timeframes are estimates; depending on factors involved in the processing of applications and project work, and the availability of funding, the timing may change from City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 2 the included timeframes. The framework does not represent actual commitments by the City of Auburn that may depend on funding resources available. GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS In planning for capital facilities, contemplation of future growth needs to be considered. The CFP is based on the following City population forecast: Year Population 2015 75,545 2016 77,060 2022 84,760 The population forecasts are based on information from the State of Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) as well as estimates developed by the City of Auburn Planning and Community Development Department. CAPITAL COSTS OF FACILITIES Based on the analysis of capital improvements contained in this document, the cost of City- owned and managed capital improvements for 2017- 2022 is summarized as follows: Type of Facility 2017 - 2022 Transportation - Arterial (102)116,115,416$ Transportation - Local (103)11,200,000 Transportation - Street (105)16,594,630 Water 37,922,573 Sanitary Sewer 10,089,900 Storm Drainage 15,932,700 Parks, Arts & Recreation 19,215,106 General Municipal Buildings 6,555,776 Community Improvements 17,610,340 Airport 5,131,249 Total 256,367,690$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 3 FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES The financing plan for the citywide capital improvements includes: Funding Source 2017 - 2022 Capital Facility Grants 92,471,865 Transportation 5,255,006 Parks, Arts & Recreation 930,000 General Municipal Buildings 800,000 Community Improvements 4,097,585 Airport User Fees / Fund Balance 34,024,173 Water 10,799,900 Sewer 16,642,700 Storm Drainage 683,664 Airport Arterial Street Fund 4,766,000 Transportation Local Street Fund 1,000,000 Transportation Arterial Street Preservation Fund 4,941,590 Transportation Local Revitalization Fund 326,251 Community Improvements Bond Proceeds 3,195,000 Water 6,000,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Municipal Parks Fund 420,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Property Tax 983,100 Parks, Arts & Recreation Sales Tax 9,300,000 Transportation Utility Tax 7,454,280 Transportation Mitigation/Impact Fees 17,923,344 Transportation 1,030,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation 71,570 Community Improvements REET 1 125,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation 4,695,776 General Municipal Buildings REET 2 5,712,519 Community Improvements 507,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation 550,000 Transportation Other Sources 4,602,967 Transportation 1,113,400 Water 10,700,000 Community Improvements 350,000 Airport 4,895,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Total 256,367,690$ (Includes grant funding that has not been secured) City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 4 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS The forecasted impacts of new capital facilities on the City’s future operating budgets (2018-2023) are as follows: Budget Year:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 Transportation 82,407$ 86,507$ 98,007$ 115,207$ 191,757$ 223,857$ 797,742$ 2 Water - - 600 600 600 600 2,400 3 Sanitary Sewer - - - - - - - 4 Storm Drainage - - - - - - - 5 Parks, Arts and Recreation 10,000 20,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 138,000 6 General Municipal Buildings - 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 475,000 7 Community Improvements - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 8 Airport - - - 4,000 6,000 6,000 16,000 9 Cemetery - - - - - - - 10 Senior Center - - - - - - - 11 Police Department - - - - - - - 12 Fire Protection - - - - - - - Total 92,407$ 211,507$ 230,607$ 251,807$ 330,357$ 362,457$ 1,479,142$ Project summary details are located on the following pages: Transportation page 92 Water page 136 Parks & Recreation page 217 General Municipal Buildings page 234 Community Improvements page 251 Airport page 268 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 5 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP Based on the proposed six-year capital projects and the projected population increase of 7,700 (10%) between 2016 and 2022, the LOS for the following City-owned public facilities will change as follows: The LOS for the following facilities will be increased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2016 LOS to the projected 2022 LOS. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2016 LOS 2022 LOS (Projected) Cemetery Burial Plots per 1,000 Pop.38.00 48.00 Community Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.2.90 3.16 Linear Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.0.22 0.24 Neighborhood Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.0.76 0.80 The LOS for the following facilities will be maintained as a result of the CFP. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2016 LOS 2022 LOS (Projected) Roads Volume/Capacity Ratio "D""D" Airport % Air Operations Support 100%100% Sanitary Sewer Residential GPCPD (Note 1)171.00 171.00 Storm Drainage N/A Water Residential GPCPD (Note 1)230.00 230.00 Note 1: GPCPD = Gallons per Customer per Day The LOS for the following facilities will be decreased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2016 LOS to the projected 2022 LOS. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2016 LOS 2022 LOS (Projected) Fire Protection Apparatus per 1,000 Pop.0.22 0.21 General Municipal Buildings Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop.3,846.87 3,600.57 Open Space Acres per 1,000 Pop.5.02 4.56 Senior Center Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop.151.40 137.65 Special Use Areas Acres per 1,000 Pop.3.30 3.00 Level of Service (LOS) is a common measure used to determine the efficiency or effectiveness of services. For the City of Auburn, LOS targets serves as a means to assess the adequacy of public facilities in meeting the needs of the population for which it serves. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 6 For example, in the case of park space, when there is an increase in population without a corresponding increase in park acreage, the LOS unit of measure (acres per 1,000 population) will decline, indicating a potential need to increase the total amount of park acreage to keep pace with population growth. On the other hand, a slight increase in population, coupled with a large increase in facilities, will result in an increased LOS. For example, facilities such as buildings or burial plots may be constructed or expanded to keep pace with anticipated population growth. While this will have the effect of increasing LOS in the short-term, in the longer-term, the LOS will gradually decline to the targeted level based on forecasted population. The impact of population growth to the LOS for facilities will vary depending on the type of facility and long range planning by the City. CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) are principally the comprehensive plans for the various public facilities included in this CFP. These individual comprehensive plans provide detailed identification of projects and identify their (projects) proposed funding sources. City documents include: • City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2015) • City Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (2012-2032) • City Comprehensive Water Plan (2015) • City Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2015) and Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2017-2022) • City Comprehensive Drainage Plan (2015) • City Comprehensive Sewer Plan (2015)  City 2017-18 Biennial Budget and 2015 Annual Financial Report; and, • City Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan Update (2015), as well as numerous other planning and financial documents. All documents are available for public inspection at the City of Auburn. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 7 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a 6-year plan (2017-2022) for capital improvements that support the City of Auburn’s current and future growth. In this plan, funding for general government projects is identified. To maintain consistency with individual master and utility comprehensive plans, applicable projects in the 6-year window of those master/utility plans are included in this CFP. The CFP also identifies LOS standards, where applicable, for each public facility. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d) requires that the comprehensive plan capital facilities element include “a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes.” RCW 36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have “probable funding” to pay for capital facility needs, or else the City must “reassess the land use element.” In addition, the capital facilities element must include the location and capacity of existing facilities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed locations and capacities. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accomplished for water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, police and fire protection facilities. The GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital f acilities. As a result, public facilities in the CFP should be based on quantifiable, objective measures of capacity such as traffic volume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In some instances, though, level of service may best be expressed in terms of qualitative statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility. Factors that influence local level of service standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, national and local standards, and Federal and State mandates. To be effective, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines suggest that the CFP be updated at least every two years. In 2007, the City transitioned to a biennial budget. With this in mind, the City will follow these guidelines and update the CFP at least every two years, incorporating the capital facilities improvements in the City’s biennial budget process. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 8 CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Concurrency The GMA requires that jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place or available within a specified time frame when development occurs. This concept is called concurrency. Under the GMA, concurrency is required for transportation facilities and is recommended by the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer. Concurrency has a direct relationship to level of service. The importance of concurrency to capital facilities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the level of service for a capital facility below the locally adopted minimum. The level of service is unique for each type of facility and is presented in the subsequent sections. Explanation of Level of Service As indicated earlier, the GMA requires that level of service be established for certain transportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrency to development proposals. The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of level of service standards for other capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public facilities. Typically, measures of level of service are expressed as ratios of facility capacity to demand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1 lists generic examples of level of service measures for some capital facilities: TABLE 1-1 Sample Level of Service Measurements The need for capital facilities is largely determined by a community’s adopted LOS standards and whether or not the community has formally designated capital facilities, other than transportation, as necessary for development to meet the concurrency test. The CFP itself is therefore largely influenced by the selection of the level of service standards. Level of service standards are measures of the quality of life in the City. The standards should be based on the City’s vision of its future and its values. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. The CFP is sensitive to funding and revenue availability and therefore needs to be constantly monitored against variations in available resources. To facilitate its implementation, the CFP should be kept current. Type of Facility Sample Level of Service Measure General Municipal Buildings Square feet per 1,000 population Parks Acres per 1,000 population Roads and Streets Ratio of actual volume to design capacity Sewer / Water Gallons per customer per day City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 9 Update of Capital Facilities Plan Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFP current is to update it regularly so the six- year plan is a rolling CFP. Again, the State recommends that the CFP be updated at least biennially. The City of Auburn will seek to update the CFP at least biennially in conjunction with the budget process. Future updates will consider: A. Revision of population projections, including annexations; B. Update of inventory of public facilities; C. Update of costs of public facilities; D. Update of public facilities requirements analysis (actual level of service compared to adopted standards); E. Update of revenue forecasts; F. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next six fiscal years; and, G. Update analysis of financial capacity. Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to level of service standards, capital projects, and/or the financing plan sources of revenue are all actions that can keep the CFP current and relevant to City decision-making. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 10 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 11 CHAPTER 2 GOALS AND POLICIES This chapter identifies goals and policies specific to the City’s provision of capital facilities. Goal 1 Provide a variety of responses to the demands of growth on public facilities. Policy 1.1 Establish land use patterns that optimize the use of public facilities. Policy 1.2 Provide additional public facility capacity when existing facilities are used to their maximum level of efficiency (consistent with adopted standards for level of service). Policy 1.3 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an efficient manner. Policy 1.4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program: 1.4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.27.095, 58.17.033 or 58.17.170. 1.4.2 Development that creates no added impact on public facilities. 1.4.3 Expansions of existing development that were disclosed and tested for concurrency as part of the original application. Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the City to fund or within the City’s authority to require others to provide. Policy 2.1 Establish level of service standards that are achievable with the financing plan of this Capital Facilities Plan. Policy 2.2 Base the financing plan for public facilities on realistic estimates of current local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be received by the City. Policy 2.3 Match revenue sources to capital projects on the basis of sound fiscal policies. 2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs through utility enterprise funds, based on user fees and grants. Public facilities included in utilities are sewer, solid waste, storm drainage, and water. 2.3.2 Where feasible pursue joint venture facility construction, construction timing, and other facility coordination measures for City provided facilities, as well as with school districts and other potential partners in developing public facilities. 2.3.3 The City shall continue to assist through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available, the City may participate in developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the extent that the improvements benefit the broader public interest, and are consistent with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 12 Policy 2.4 If the projected funding is inadequate to finance needed public facilities and utilities based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth, the City will do one or more of the following to achieve a balance between available revenue and needed public facilities: 2.4.1 Lower the level of service standards; 2.4.2 Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources; 2.4.3 Adopt new sources of revenue; 2.4.4 Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense; and/or 2.4.5 Amend the Land Use Element to reduce the need for additional public facilities. Policy 2.5 Both existing and future development will pay for the costs of needed capital improvements. 2.5.1 Ensure that existing development pays for capital improvements that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or all of the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Existing development may also pay a portion of the cost of capital improvements needed by future development. Existing development’s payments may take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. 2.5.2 Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities which it requires. Future development may also pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. Future development’s payments may take the form of voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user’s fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. Policy 2.6 The City will determine the priority of public facility capital improvements using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue source that cannot be used for the highest priority will be used beginning with the highest priority for which the revenue can legally be expended. 2.6.1 Projects that eliminate hazardous conditions. 2.6.2 Refurbishment of existing facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining standards for adopted level of service. 2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in level of service for existing demand. 2.6.4 New or expanded facilities that provide the adopted level of service for new development and redevelopment during the next six fiscal years. 2.6.5 Capital improvements that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility, or otherwise mitigate impacts of public facilities on future operating budgets. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 13 2.6.6 Capital improvements that contribute to stabilizing and developing the economy of the City. 2.6.7 Project priorities may also involve additional criteria that are unique to each type of public facility, as described in other elements of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 2.7 Ensure that the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the facility. Goal 3 Protect public health, environmental quality, and neighborhood stability and viability through the appropriate design and installation of public facilities. Policy 3.1 Promote conservation of energy, water and other natural resources in the location and design of public facilities. Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered. Policy 3.3 Practice efficient and environmentally responsible maintenance and operating procedures. Policy 3.4 The siting, design, construction and improvement of all public buildings shall be done in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stability and growth through strategic investments in public facilities and public private/partnerships. Goal 4 Make the Capital Facilities Plan consistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan, and - to the extent feasible - with other city, county, regional and state adopted plans. Policy 4.1 Ensure that the growth and development assumptions used in the Capital Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of the comprehensive plan. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non-city providers of public facilities on a joint program for maintaining applicable level of service standards, concurrency requirements, funding and construction of public facilities. Goal 5 Provide public facilities that provide a sense of community that is inclusive of diverse populations. Policy 5.1 Contribute to community pride and foster a sense of community through provision of public facilities that create a community gathering place for neighbors, family and friends. Policy 5.2 Through provision of public facilities offer a broad range of activities promoting social interactions especially with new residents. Policy 5.3 Provide maximum flexibility and multiple uses through design of public facilities that are adaptable to changing interests. Policy 5.4 Provide a community center facility that is financially feasible, affordable for participants, and can generate revenue to offset a portion of the operating costs. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 14 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 15 CHAPTER 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. INTRODUCTION This CFP includes City capital improvement projects and the financing plan to pay for those projects. It also contains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies level of service standards, where applicable. Each type of City public facility is presented in a separate subsection that follows a standard format. Throughout this section, tables of data are identified with abbreviations that correspond to the type of facility. For example, Table W-1 refers to Table 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreviation corresponds to the name of the type of facility. 1. Narrative Summary This is an overview of the data, with sections devoted to Current Facilities, Level of Service, Capital Facilities Projects and Financing, and Impact on Future Operating Budgets. 2. Inventory of Facilities (Table X-1) This is a list of existing capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to level of service), and location. This table also includes any proposed capital projects and the planned inventory total through December 31, 2022. 3. Capital Projects and Financing Plan (Table X-2, X-2A and X-2B) This is a list of capital improvements that identifies existing deficiencies, identifies facilities needed for future growth, and identifies the need to repair or replace obsolete or worn out facilities through December 31, 2022. Each list shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. 4. Impact on Future Operating Budgets (Table X-3) This is a list of capital projects and the forecasted impacts on the City’s future operating budgets (2018 – 2023). City of Draft Auburn Capital Facilities Plan 16 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 17 TRANSPORTATION Current Facilities Roadways: The City’s street system consists of a network of approximately 216 miles of arterials, collectors, local streets and alleys. Existing non-motorized facilities include a mix of trails, sidewalks, bicycle lanes and sharrows. Transit: King County Metro Transit, Sound Transit and Pierce Transit serve the Auburn area. Auburn is currently served by eight Metro bus routes, two Sound Transit bus routes, and one Pierce Transit bus route. In addition, Sound Transit “Sounder” commuter trains provide peak hour service at the Auburn Station. The Sounder also provides special event service to selected sporting events. Bus and rail service is supported by park and ride facilities and the Auburn Station. Level of Service (LOS) Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Level of Service (LOS) standards for both arterials and transit routes. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction's LOS standards be coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the actual standards and the methods used are determined by each local jurisdiction. Under GMA, the focus is on the performance of the whole road system, not on individual intersections or roadways. LOS standards are a tool to help keep the transportation system in balance with the needs of forecast population growth and development. Table T-1a summarizes the LOS definitions. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 18 Table T-1a Definition of Urban Street Level of Service (LOS) LOS A - describes primarily free flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free flow speed for the given street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. LOS B - describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and stopped delays are not bothersome. LOS C - describes stable conditions; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. LOS D - borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed. LOS E - is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of 33 percent or less of the free flow speed. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. LOS F - is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one-fourth of the free flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes and extensive queuing. Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 2010, page 10-5 A methodology and set of standards have been drafted for the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The standards help determine concurrency (i.e., balance) between transportation and land use elements of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, as required by the GMA. The City has four choices if it is determined that standards cannot be met.  Modify the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to reduce traffic.  Construct additional transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new development.  Implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to increase use of non- single occupant vehicle travel modes.  Relax the LOS standards; the City can lower its level of service standards to encourage further growth and minimize the need for additional transportation facilities. The transportation land-use balance will be monitored through the City's Concurrency Management System as part of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Transportation concurrency will be evaluated for key facilities and on a system-wide basis. The City can then identify locations where standards are not anticipated to be met in the future and identify appropriate improvements. At the project level, the SEPA process will continue to guide the more specific planning and analysis efforts. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 19 Level of Service Standards LOS standards can help identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will impact system operations. LOS provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. LOS standards can also be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding street system. They can assure that all developments are served by a safe, efficient and cost-effective street system. They can also be used to disclose impacts, identify remedial actions, and apportion costs between public and private sources. The LOS standards shown in Table T-1b apply to the facility’s location and its functional classification. A more detailed description of the level of service methodology is provided in the City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2015), page 5-4. Table T- 1b Draft Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS Standards LOS standards are also the basis of an equitable traffic impact fee system, which require developments to pay a portion of the costs for capacity improvements to the transportation infrastructure. In 2001, the City implemented a traffic impact fee program. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate traffic impacts more equitably while making the costs of development more predictable to developers. In 2007, the City implemented an additional transportation impact fee to address the impacts of heavy truck usage on the City’s transportation system. Both fees are updated annually so that the fees are consistent with current project costs. Measuring Transportation System Performance The level of service for street segments or links is analyzed with two primary purposes in mind. First, this site-specific LOS can be used, with the help of a travel demand model, to evaluate areas of congestion within a transportation network, leading to the development of a long-range transportation facilities plan. Second, arterial corridor LOS analysis can be used to assess concurrency or if facilities are meeting the LOS standards. The City of Auburn currently uses Highway Capacity Manual methodologies to calculate levels of service. For arterials LOS are based on average travel speeds along a defined corridor. Roadway/Intersection Maximum V/C Ratio/LOS Arterial Corridor D* Signalized Intersection D Unsignalized Intersection D *Unless otherwise specified in Chapter 2 of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2015 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 20 Table T-1c shows the 25 defined street corridors, LOS standards and most recent calculated LOS. TABLE T- 1c Auburn Corridor Level of Service – Existing 2014 Weekday PM Peak Hour LOS ID Corridor From To Standard*NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St E C C 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE F C D 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr SE D B C 5 M St / Harvey Auburn Way N E Main St E D D 6 M St / Harvey E Main St Auburn Way S E D C 7 37th St NE / NW W Valley Hwy Auburn Way N E C C 8 15th St NE / NW W Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F**D D 9 Auburn Ave / A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D B C 10 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 11 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW E D D 12 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR - 18 D B C 13 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 14 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 15 R St SE / Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B B 16 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 17 A St NW / B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 18 8th St NE / Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 19 SE 312th St / 132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR - 18 D B B 20 105th Pl SE / SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D A C 21 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE E D C 22 29th St SE / Riverwalk Dr A St SE Auburn Way S D D C 23 3rd St SW / Cross St C St Auburn Way S F F E 24 41st St SE / Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE F F F 25 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D E * **Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet the LOS Standards Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. 2014 LOS City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 21 Concurrency (Adequate Public Facilities) Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. In compliance with the GMA, adequate transportation system facilities must be available within six years of the time of occupancy and use of new development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s transportation facilities include projects totaling $143,910,046. Tables T-2, T-2A and T-2B show the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table T-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $797,742 are forecasted for transportation facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 22 TABLE T- 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – ARTERIAL STREET 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Capacity Projects: 1 A Street NW, Phase 1 Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 5 M Street Underpass Capital Costs - - - - - - - Long-Term Debt 124,305 124,013 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 124,305 124,013 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 PWTF Loan - - - - - - - Other (Other Agencies)- - - - - - - 6 S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - Other (Fund 105)200,000 - - - - - 200,000 9 Auburn Way S Improvements (Hemlock St SE to Academy Dr SE) Capital Costs 100,000 - - 2,000,000 6,350,000 10,000,000 18,450,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 1,720,000 4,580,000 8,650,000 14,950,000 Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 - - 140,000 385,000 675,000 1,250,000 Other (MIT)50,000 - - 140,000 1,385,000 675,000 2,250,000 10 F Street SE, 4th to AWS Capital Costs 40,000 2,502,000 - - - - 2,542,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Grants 40,000 2,162,000 - - - - 2,202,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 190,000 - - - - 190,000 11 M Street NE, E. Main to 4th Capital Costs 50,000 350,000 1,250,000 - - - 1,650,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - 280,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,280,000 Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 70,000 250,000 - - - 370,000 14 M St SE and 12th St SE Traffic Signal Capital Costs - - - 625,000 - - 625,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 500,000 - - 500,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - Other - - - 125,000 - - 125,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 23 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Capacity Projects: 15 8th Street NE Widening (Pike Street to R Street NE) Capital Costs - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - 360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 17 Harvey Road & 8th Street NE Intersection Improvements Long-Term Debt 85,206 84,805 84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - PWTF - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 85,206 84,805 84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 24 Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail Capital Costs - - - 425,000 425,000 - 850,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 42,500 42,500 - 85,000 Grants - - - 382,500 382,500 - 765,000 25 46th Place S Realignment Capital Costs - - - - 825,000 - 825,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 575,000 - 575,000 REET 2 - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - 38 C Street SW & 15th Street SW Intersection Improvements Capital Costs - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 800,000 - 800,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 39 124th Ave SE Corridor & 320th Intersection Improvements Capital Costs - - - 350,000 1,600,000 - 1,950,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 175,000 150,000 - 325,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 Other (GRC)- - - 175,000 250,000 - 425,000 40 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 Capital Costs - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - 300,000 880,000 2,000,000 - 3,180,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 100,000 220,000 500,000 - 820,000 41 R Street Bypass Capital Costs - - - - - 650,000 650,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Other - - - - - 500,000 500,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 24 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Capacity Projects: 42 SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements Phase 1 Capital Costs - - 600,000 662,500 3,281,600 - 4,544,100 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - 480,000 530,000 2,953,440 - 3,963,440 Traffic Impact Fees - - 120,000 132,500 328,160 - 580,660 43 Auburn Way South Corridor Safety Improvements Capital Costs 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT)- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 45 124th Avenue SE & SE 284th Street Intersection Safety Improvements Capital Costs - - 100,000 600,000 - - 700,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 450,000 - - 450,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 100,000 150,000 - - 250,000 49 West Valley Highway Improvements (15th St NW to W Main St) Capital Costs - - 100,000 600,000 3,000,000 - 3,700,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 480,000 2,400,000 - 2,880,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 100,000 120,000 600,000 - 820,000 51 Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion Capital Costs 900,000 - - - - - 900,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)711,000 - - - - - 711,000 Traffic Impact Fees 189,000 - - - - - 189,000 52 A Street SE & Lakeland Hills Way SE Intersection Safety & Capacity Imp. Capital Costs 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 53 AWS and 12th Street SE Intersection Improvements Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 25 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Capacity Projects: 54 Kersey Way Study Capital Costs - - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 200,000 - 200,000 Grants - - - - 800,000 - 800,000 55 Auburn Way South (SR-164) Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs - 260,000 1,190,000 - - - 1,450,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 52,000 238,000 - - - 290,000 Grants - 208,000 952,000 - - - 1,160,000 56 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements Capital Costs 300,000 410,000 2,270,000 - - - 2,980,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants 200,000 300,000 1,420,000 - - - 1,920,000 Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 57,000 400,033 - - - 507,033 Other (Auburn School Dist.)50,000 53,000 327,443 - - - 430,443 Other (Private Development)- - 122,524 - - - 122,524 59 Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements Capital Costs - 500,000 580,000 3,900,000 - - 4,980,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - 400,000 464,000 3,120,000 - - 3,984,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 100,000 116,000 780,000 - - 996,000 60 M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to AWS) Capital Costs - - - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000 Other - - - 250,000 250,000 - 500,000 63 29th Street SE & R Street SE Intersection Improvements Capital Costs - - 100,000 1,800,000 - - 1,900,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000 REET2 - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 100,000 500,000 - - 600,000 64 Lea Hill Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE) Capital Costs 100,000 - - 2,450,000 10,000,000 - 12,550,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - 1,950,000 8,000,000 - 9,950,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 - - 500,000 2,000,000 - 2,600,000 Other - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 26 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Capacity Projects: 65 Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Ave SE to 112th Ave SE) Capital Costs - - - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 2,900,000 7,100,000 10,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 600,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 Other - - - - - - - 66 Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE) Capital Costs - - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - 750,000 750,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 250,000 250,000 Other - - - - - - - 67 BNSF & A St SE Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Capital Costs - - - - 650,000 4,900,000 5,550,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 400,000 3,500,000 3,900,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 250,000 1,400,000 1,650,000 Other - - - - - - - 69 22nd Street NE & I St NE Intersection Capital Costs - 1,175,000 - - - - 1,175,000 Funding Sources: Grants - 940,000 - - - - 940,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 235,000 - - - - 235,000 Other - - - - - - - 72 West Valley Highway Improvements (SR-18 to 15th St SW) Capital Costs - 100,000 500,000 2,500,000 - - 3,100,000 Funding Sources: Grants - - 400,000 2,000,000 - - 2,400,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 100,000 100,000 500,000 - - 700,000 Other - - - - - - - 73 Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor) Capital Costs - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 66,000 - - - - 66,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - 34,000 - - - - 34,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 2,119,511 5,630,818 7,773,122 20,369,928 39,113,333 25,281,039 100,287,751 TIP#Non-Capacity Projects: 2 A St Traffic Signal Improvements Capital Costs - - 125,000 900,000 - - 1,025,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 125,000 250,000 - - 375,000 Grants - - - 650,000 - - 650,000 Other - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 27 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Non-Capacity Projects: 3 Auburn Way Corridor Improvements Capital Costs - - - 818,700 3,000,000 - 3,818,700 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 110,000 600,000 - 710,000 Grants - - - 708,700 2,400,000 - 3,108,700 Other - - - - - - - 18 M Street SE & 29th Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements Capital Costs - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Grants - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Other - - - - - - - 19 Auburn Way North/1st Street NE Signal Improvements Capital Costs - 50,000 550,000 - - - 600,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 125,000 - - - 175,000 Grants - - 425,000 - - - 425,000 Other - - - - - - - 20 R Street SE & 21st Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements Capital Costs - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Grants - - - 700,000 - - 700,000 Other - - - - - - - 21 Main Street Signal Upgrades Capital Costs 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - - 23 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs - 250,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,750,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 125,000 125,000 - - - 250,000 Grants - - 1,250,000 - - - 1,250,000 Other - 125,000 125,000 - - - 250,000 27 A Street SE Safety Improvements Study Capital Costs 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,000 - - - - - 5,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 29 S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements Capital Costs - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Other - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 28 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total TIP#Non-Capacity Projects: 30 Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility & Safety Program Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 31 Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements Capital Costs - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Grants - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 44 Downtown Transit Center Access Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 550,000 - - - - 600,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 10,000 110,000 - - - - 120,000 Grants 40,000 440,000 - - - - 480,000 Other - - - - - - - 50 ITS Dynamic Message Signs Capital Costs 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 700,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 - 220,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - Other (WRA)- - - - - - - Grants - 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 480,000 58 M St SE Storm Improvements Capital Costs 175,000 - - - - - 175,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - - - - - 125,000 REET - - - - - - - Other (Fund 105)50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - - 62 AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR 18 to M St SE) Capital Costs - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 Grants - - - 1,750,000 2,600,000 - 4,350,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - 68 37th St SE & A St SE Traffic Signal Safety Improvement Capital Costs 183,965 - - - - - 183,965 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants 183,965 - - - - - 183,965 Other- Fund 105 - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 633,965 1,220,000 2,445,000 5,238,700 6,070,000 220,000 15,827,665 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 29 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 1,910,000 5,422,000 7,565,000 20,162,500 38,906,600 25,075,000 99,041,100 Non-Capacity Projects 633,965 1,220,000 2,445,000 5,238,700 6,070,000 220,000 15,827,665 Long-Term Debt 209,511 208,818 208,122 207,428 206,733 206,039 1,246,651 Total Costs 2,753,476 6,850,818 10,218,122 25,608,628 45,183,333 25,501,039 116,115,416 FUNDING SOURCES: Unrestricted Street Revenue 510,000 783,000 743,000 1,207,500 1,322,500 200,000 4,766,000 Grants 1,174,965 4,850,000 7,171,000 19,266,200 35,860,940 20,000,000 88,323,105 Traffic Impact Fees 718,511 1,005,818 1,729,155 4,444,928 5,864,893 4,126,039 17,889,344 Traffic Mitigation Fees - 34,000 - - - - 34,000 REET2 - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 PWTF Loan - - - - - - - Fund 105 -Arterial St. Preserv.250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Other* (Other Agencies)100,000 178,000 574,967 690,000 1,885,000 1,175,000 4,602,967 Total Funding 2,753,476 6,850,818 10,218,122 25,608,628 45,183,333 25,501,039 116,115,416 * Mitigation agreements, contributions, other agencies City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 30 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) TIP # 1 Project No:c207a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# 18 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 123,276 - - - 123,276 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)6,562,702 - - - 6,562,702 Traffic Impact Fees 1,189,853 80,000 25,000 25,000 1,294,853 Other Sources -Multicare Contribution 383,381 - - - 383,381 8,259,212 80,000 25,000 25,000 8,364,212 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,247,331 - - - 2,247,331 Right of Way 821,341 - - - 821,341 Environmental 189,900 80,000 25,000 25,000 294,900 Construction 5,000,640 - - - 5,000,640 8,259,212 80,000 25,000 25,000 8,364,212 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Other Sources -Multicare Contribution - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Environmental 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Construction - - - - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 150,000 Description: Construct a new multi-lane arterial from 3rd Street NW to 14th Street NW. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and completes a missing link of a north/south arterial corridor. The project length is approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased right-of-way from the northern property owner. If the property develops, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251,000). Progress Summary: Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final design and environmental permitting were completed in 2011 and construction was completed in 2013. Major plantings are scheduled in 2015 as part of the wetland monitoring that is required to continue until 2023. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,830. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 31 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP # 5 Project No:c201a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 6 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)9,696,313 - - - 9,696,313 REET2 1,140,000 - - - 1,140,000 Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)4,162,001 - - - 4,162,001 Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)270,792 124,598 124,305 124,013 519,695 Traffic Mitigation Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000 PWTFL (30 years)3,284,857 - - - 3,284,857 Other Sources (Other Agencies)*3,126,104 - - - 3,126,104 22,340,067 124,598 124,305 124,013 22,588,970 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,688,924 - - - 2,688,924 Right of Way 3,358,443 - - - 3,358,443 Construction 16,021,908 - - - 16,021,908 PWTFL Debt Service 270,792 124,598 124,305 124,013 519,695 22,340,067 124,598 124,305 124,013 22,588,970 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - PWTFL (30 years)- - - - - Other Sources (Other Agencies)*- - - - - 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - PWTFL Debt Service 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 741,444 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Grants / Other Sources: Other Agencies are King County Metro Sewer, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, and BNSF Railway Description: Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks. Progress Summary: 100% Design Drawings and right of way acquisition were completed in 2011. Construction started in early 2012 and was completed in 2014. Debt Service is scheduled each year through 2041. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $21,827. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 32 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements TIP # 6 Project No:c222a0 STIP# AUB-42 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 15 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 390,601 17,906 - - 408,507 Grants- Secured Federal 960,010 60,691 - - 1,020,701 Grants- Secured State - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees 3,719 931,800 - - 935,519 Other (Development Funds)*1,300,000 1,000,000 - - 2,300,000 Other (105 Fund)- - 200,000 - 200,000 2,654,330 6,010,397 200,000 - 8,864,727 Capital Expenditures: Design 1,354,300 61,000 - - 1,415,300 Right of Way 1,300,000 36,870 - - 1,336,870 Construction 30 5,912,527 200,000 - 6,112,557 2,654,330 6,010,397 200,000 - 8,864,727 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - Other (105 Fund)- - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project includes preliminary engineering, design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of major widening on S 277th Street, including the addition of three lanes, one westbound and two eastbound, a Class 1 trail, and storm improvements. The project is approximately 0.9 miles long. Progress Summary: Staff is coordinating with the City of Kent and King County to complete annexation of the roadway into the City of Auburn. Robertson Properties Group is participating in this project and is dedicating all necessary roadway frontage to the City. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance costs for this project is estimated to be $27,250. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 33 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way S Improvements (Hemlock St SE to Academy Dr SE)TIP # 9 Project No:asbd02 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 100,000 50,000 - 150,000 REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)- 100,000 50,000 - 150,000 - 200,000 100,000 - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 100,000 - 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 200,000 100,000 - 300,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 1,720,000 4,580,000 8,650,000 14,950,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 140,000 385,000 675,000 1,250,000 REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)- 140,000 1,385,000 675,000 2,250,000 - 2,000,000 6,350,000 10,000,000 18,450,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 2,000,000 3,000,000 - 5,100,000 Right of Way - - 3,350,000 - 3,350,000 Construction - - - 10,000,000 10,000,000 - 2,000,000 6,350,000 10,000,000 18,450,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: Widen Auburn Way S between Hemlock St SE and Academy Dr SE to accommodate two general purpose lanes in each direction, center turn lanes, access management medians, U-turns, curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, transit stop improvements, new traffic signals, Intelligent Transportation Systems, streetscape and storm improvements. The project length is approximately two miles. Progress Summary: Conceptual corridor plan will be coordinated with the MIT and WSDOT in 2016. This project is planned as a partnership between the City of Auburn and the MIT. Pre-design effort will produce a project construction cost estimate. Major grant funding is expected to come from future federal competitions. This project will extend corridor improvements along Auburn Way S completed under previous projects. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 34 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Downtown to Les Gove) TIP # 10 Project No:cp1416 Project Type:Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 40,000 - 150,000 40,000 Grants- Secured Federal 141,070 338,930 40,000 - 520,000 Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - 2,162,000 - Traffic Impact Fees 24,935 105,065 - 190,000 130,000 Other - - - - - 166,005 483,995 40,000 2,502,000 690,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 166,005 433,995 40,000 - 640,000 Right of Way - 50,000 - - 50,000 Construction - - - 2,502,000 - 166,005 483,995 40,000 2,502,000 690,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed)- - - - 40,000 Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - - 2,162,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 190,000 Other - - - - - - - - 2,542,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,502,000 - - - - 2,542,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Description: The F St SE project includes pavement rehabilitation, installation of curbs, gutters, bike lanes, sidewalks, ADA improvements, utility undergrounding, LED street lighting, new two way center left turn-lane, crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge, initiation of Auburn Staff Bike share pilot program, wayfinding signage and a "Bicycle Boulevard" designation of roadway connections between Auburn City Hall and the Les Gove Park Campus. This project improves mobility and safety along the corridor and will complete a gap in the non-motorized network between Auburn's Downtown and the Les Gove Community Campus. The major infrastructure improvements are approximately 0.3 miles long and the "Bicycle Boulevard" improvements are just over a mile long. Progress Summary: Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Federal Grant was secured in 2014 for design and ROW phases. Design phase was initiated in 2015. Construction grant funding was applied for in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $4,100. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 35 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP # 11 Project No:asbd12 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - 280,000 - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 70,000 50,000 Other - - - - - - - 50,000 350,000 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 350,000 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 50,000 350,000 50,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)1,000,000 - - - 1,280,000 REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 250,000 - - - 370,000 Other - - - - - 1,250,000 - - - 1,650,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 400,000 Right of Way 100,000 - - - 100,000 Construction 1,150,000 - - - 1,150,000 1,250,000 - - - 1,650,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project will construct a four-lane street section that includes sidewalks, gutters, landscaping and streetlights on M St NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE. Progress Summary: Pre-design will be completed during 2017 to refine project scope, alignment, and cost. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,500. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 36 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SE/12th Street SE Traffic Signal TIP # 14 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Intersection Improvement, Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 11 Activity: 2016 YE 2015 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other- Developer - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 500,000 - - 500,000 REET 2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other- Developer - 125,000 - - 125,000 - 625,000 - - 625,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 75,000 - - 75,000 Right of Way - 50,000 - - 50,000 Construction - 500,000 - - 500,000 - 625,000 - - 625,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project includes the design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of a new traffic signal. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $6,600. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 37 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 8th Street NE Widening (Pike St NE to R St NE)TIP # 15 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000 REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000 Other - - - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 200,000 - - - 200,000 Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: Widen 8th Street NE to extend the five-lane cross-section which currently exists to the west of Pike St NE to R St NE by providing an additional travel lane along the south side of the roadway. This is a planning level cost estimate. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $600. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 38 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Harvey Rd NE/8th St NE Intersection Improvements TIP # 17 Project No:cp0611 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:None LOS Corridor ID# 5,19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)521,510 85,607 85,206 84,805 692,323 Traffic Impact Fees 204,500 - - - 204,500 PWTF 1,527,300 - - - 1,527,300 2,253,310 85,607 85,206 84,805 2,424,123 Capital Expenditures: Design 327,500 - - - 327,500 Right of Way 200,400 - - - 200,400 Construction 1,203,900 - - - 1,203,900 Long Term Debt - PWTF 521,510 85,607 85,206 84,805 692,323 2,253,310 85,607 85,206 84,805 2,424,123 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - PWTF - - - - - 84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long Term Debt - PWTF 84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 84,402 84,000 83,598 83,196 505,207 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Description: Add one eastbound through/right turn-lane on 8th St NE to the west of Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traffic channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane will reduce traffic delays and queuing at the intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all directions. This project will reconstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles long with a four-lane cross-section. The reconstruction will address the existing poor pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the sidewalk network. Progress Summary: Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for Public Works Trust Fund Loan debt payments scheduled through 2028. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 39 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail TIP # 24 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Class 1 Trail (Capacity) Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 42,500 42,500 - 85,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 382,500 382,500 - 765,000 REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - 425,000 425,000 - 850,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 325,000 425,000 - 750,000 - 425,000 425,000 - 850,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will use existing Academy Drive right-of-way to create a multi-use trail between the Green River Road and Auburn Way South. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,000. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 40 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 46th Place S Realignment TIP # 25 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 575,000 - 575,000 REET 2 - - 250,000 - 250,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - 825,000 - 825,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 125,000 - 125,000 Right of Way - - 25,000 - 25,000 Construction - - 675,000 - 675,000 - - 825,000 - 825,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The project will realign 46th Place S to the south of S 321st Street. The realignment will move the 46th Place S intersection with S 321st Street approximately 350 feet to the east of the current location. This will create two T-intersections (44th Avenue S and 46th Place S) in place of the existing four-leg intersection. The existing 46th Place S will be dead-ended to the south of S 321st Street. The project will improve safety and traffic operations at the intersections. Progress Summary: Right-of-way for the realigned roadway will be dedicated as part of an adjacent development project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,750. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 41 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: C Street SW & 15th Street SW Intersection Improvements TIP # 38 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 12,13 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 800,000 - 800,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 200,000 1,000,000 - 1,200,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will install a southbound right-turn pocket, re-channelize the intersection to provide two southbound through lanes, and replace the existing span wire traffic signal with a new traffic signal. Progress Summary: Design is planned to begin in 2020. Construction will be scheduled once full funding is secured. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 42 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor & 320th Intersection Improvements TIP # 39 Project No:asbd04 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other (GRC)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 175,000 150,000 - 325,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 REET 2 - - - - - Other (GRC)- 175,000 250,000 - 425,000 - 350,000 1,600,000 - 1,950,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 350,000 - - 350,000 Right of Way - - 100,000 - 100,000 Construction - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 - 350,000 1,600,000 - 1,950,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the intersection of SE 320th St and 124th Ave SE. The intersection is located at the main entrance to Green River College and will require additional on- site improvements to be constructed. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 43 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th to SE 318th)TIP # 40 Project No:asbd01 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal 300,000 880,000 2,000,000 - 3,180,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 220,000 500,000 - 820,000 Other - - - - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 400,000 - - - 400,000 Right of Way - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a four-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on 124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th Street. The project will also fund improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 312th St and 124th Ave SE (including adding bike lanes, dual westbound left-turn lanes, dual southbound through-lanes, a northbound right-turn pocket, ITS improvements, and pedestrian safety improvements). Progress Summary: Phase 1 improvements between SE 318th and SE 316th were completed by GRCC in 2012. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $3,500. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 44 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: R Street Bypass (M Street SE to SR-18)TIP # 41 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources (Development)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 150,000 150,000 Other Sources (Development)- - - 500,000 500,000 - - - 650,000 650,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - 650,000 650,000 Construction - - - - - - - - 650,000 650,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project will complete the design and construction of the Bypass Rd, an arterial connection between M Street and Auburn Black Diamond Road, paralleling the rail line. The project will provide an arterial connection from the newly constructed M Street Underpass to the Auburn Black Diamond Road interchange with SR-18 to keep both vehicular and freight traffic out of residential neighborhoods along R Street SE north of the Stampede Pass line. The arterial connection may also provide opportunities for partnering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe as they redevelop the Miles Pit area and as more definitive plans are developed for a potential new WSDOT interchange on SR-18 in the vicinity of the project. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 45 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements (116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave SE)TIP # 42 Project No:asbd19 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 25 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - - - 100,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal 480,000 530,000 2,953,440 - 3,963,440 Traffic Impact Fees 120,000 132,500 328,160 - 580,660 PWTFL - - - - - Other - - - - - 600,000 662,500 3,281,600 - 4,544,100 Capital Expenditures: Design 600,000 250,000 - - 850,000 Right of Way - 412,500 - - 412,500 Construction - - 3,281,600 - 3,281,600 600,000 662,500 3,281,600 - 4,544,100 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: SE 320th St is a primary route serving Green River Community College and adjacent neighborhoods. There are very high volumes of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit utilizing the corridor. This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of non-motorized roadway and safety improvements including a roundabout at 116th Ave SE, adding bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and street lighting between 122nd Ave SE and 116th Ave SE. Project length is approximately .45 miles. Progress Summary: GRCC completed the design and construction for the segment between 124th Ave SE and 122nd Ave SE in 2013. Corridor pre-design is scheduled to start in 2016. Final design and construction will be dependent on securing future grant funding. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 46 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South (SR-164) Corridor Safety Improvements TIP # 43 Project No:cp1218 STIP# AUB-44 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# 4 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 2,910 - - - 2,910 Grants- Secured (Federal)311,568 2,021,540 - - 2,333,108 Traffic Impact Fees 54,455 250,000 20,000 - 324,455 WSDOT (Federal)- 306,674 - - 306,674 Other - - - - - 368,933 2,578,214 20,000 - 2,967,147 Capital Expenditures: Design 368,933 250,000 - - 618,933 Right of Way - 100,000 - - 100,000 Construction - 2,228,214 20,000 - 2,248,214 368,933 2,578,214 20,000 - 2,967,147 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Federal)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 20,000 WSDOT (Federal)- - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project will improve access management, including U-turns, upgrade transit stops and street lighting, widen to accommodate turn-lanes and pedestrian and bicycle facilities, upgrade pavement markings, install pedestrian signals and audible pedestrian push buttons, and upgrade traffic signals to change the phasing and to improve the visibility of the signal heads. Progress Summary: Grant funding was awarded in 2012. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 47 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Avenue SE & SE 284th Street Intersection Safety Improvements TIP # 45 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 450,000 - - 450,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 150,000 - - 250,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 600,000 - - 700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 - - - 100,000 Right of Way - 50,000 - - 50,000 Construction - 550,000 - - 550,000 100,000 600,000 - - 700,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will complete the design and construction of intersection safety and capacity improvements. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be minimal. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 48 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: West Valley Highway Improvements (15th Street NW to W Main Street)TIP # 49 Project No:asbd13 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 35 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 480,000 2,400,000 - 2,880,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 120,000 600,000 - 820,000 100,000 600,000 3,000,000 - 3,700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 600,000 - - 700,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 100,000 600,000 3,000,000 - 3,700,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project scope includes pavement rehabilitation and re-channelization, roadway widening, bicycle lanes, pedestrian facilities, roadway lighting, required storm system improvements, and Intelligent Transportation System Improvements. Progress Summary: Survey, base mapping and pre-design are planned to be completed in 2019 to complete preliminary plans and refine project cost-estimate. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 49 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion TIP # 51 Project No:asbd17 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured Federal - 82,950 - - 82,950 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - 711,000 - 711,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 22,050 189,000 - 211,050 Other - - - - - - 105,000 900,000 - 1,005,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 105,000 900,000 - 1,005,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 105,000 900,000 - 1,005,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured Federal - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - 711,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 189,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 900,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 900,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The project funds the design, coordination, permitting, and construction of new Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) infrastructure along Lake Tapps Parkway from Lakeland Hills Way to East Valley Highway, and along East Valley Highway to Lakeland Hills Way. The proposed ITS infrastructure includes conduit, fiber, VMS signage, cameras, network communication upgrades, and weather stations along the route. Progress Summary: Federal Grant application was submitted to PSRC in May 2014. Project was awarded design funds in 2016. Construction funding grant application was submitted in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 50 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street SE & Lakeland Hills Way SE Intersection Safety & Capacity Imp.TIP # 52 Project No:asbd15 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 50,000 25,000 - 75,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 25,000 - 75,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 25,000 - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 50,000 25,000 - 75,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 25,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 25,000 Total Expenditures: Description: This project will study traffic operations, safety, and prepare a preliminary design for intersection improvements. Progress Summary: Analysis, preliminary design, and construction cost estimate will be initiated in 2016. Future phases will be programmed as funding becomes available. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 51 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South and 12th Street SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 53 Project No:cp1114 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 150,000 - 200,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 150,000 - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 150,000 - 150,000 - 50,000 150,000 - 200,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will design and construct multi-modal intersection improvements at the AWS/12th Street SE intersection. The improvements will include pedestrian access, bicycle lanes, signal phasing and timing, and ITS upgrades. Progress Summary: Design is scheduled to be completed in 2016. Portions of these improvements will be coordinated with WSDOT's planned paving project for 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 52 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Kersey Way SE Corridor Study TIP # 54 Project No:asbd11 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - 50,000 - - 50,000 Other - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 200,000 - 200,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 800,000 - 800,000 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - Other (Developer)*- - - - - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will study improvements to the Kersey Way SE corridor from the White River Bridge to the southern city limits. The study will develop the scope and costs for horizontal /vertical geometric roadway improvements, provide roadside hazard mitigation, street lighting and non-motorized trail construction. The project length is approximately two miles. Progress Summary: Pre-Design will begin in 2016 following the completion of the update to the Comprehensive Plan. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 53 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South (SR-164) Sidewalk Improvements TIP # 55 Project No:asbd23 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 4 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 52,000 - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 208,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 260,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 260,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 260,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 238,000 - - - 290,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal 952,000 - - - 1,160,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,190,000 - - - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 260,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,190,000 - - - 1,190,000 1,190,000 - - - 1,450,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct missing sidewalks along both sides of Auburn Way S. The existing sidewalks currently end to the east of the intersection with 17th Street SE and restart to the west of the intersection with Muckleshoot Plaza. The sidewalk gap extends for approximately 1,700 feet. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding was applied for in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 54 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements TIP # 56 Project No:asbd14 STIP# n/a Project Type:Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - 200,000 300,000 200,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 50,000 57,000 50,000 Other (Auburn Sch. Dist.)- - 50,000 53,000 50,000 Other (Private Development)- - - - - - - 300,000 410,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 300,000 200,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - 210,000 - Construction - - - - - - - 300,000 410,000 300,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal 1,420,000 - - - 1,920,000 Traffic Impact Fees 400,033 - - - 507,033 Other (Auburn Sch. Dist.)327,443 - - - 430,443 Other (Private Development)122,524 - - - 122,524 2,270,000 - - - 2,980,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 500,000 Right of Way - - - - 210,000 Construction 2,270,000 - - - 2,270,000 2,270,000 - - - 2,980,000 Grants / Other Sources: Auburn School District partnership includes direct financial contribution and ROW dedication. Description: The project will widen S 316th Street from 52nd Avenue S to the west of the Evergreen Elementary School frontage to accommodate the addition of bike lanes and sidewalks along the north side of the street , matching the existing roadway cross-section to the east of the school. The S 316th Street improvements include the vertical realignment of the existing roadway along the school frontage which creates sight-distance problems associated with the school driveways and at the intersection with 56th Avenue S. The 56th Avenue S approach to S 316th Street will be realigned to the east to remove the offset between the street approach and school driveway, and a roundabout will be constructed at the S 316th Street/56th Avenue S intersection replacing the existing all-way stop-control. Other project elements include street lighting and required storm water system improvements. Progress Summary: Grant funding application was submitted in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 55 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements TIP # 59 Project No:asbd24 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 400,000 - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 100,000 - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 500,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 500,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 500,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal 464,000 3,120,000 - - 3,984,000 Traffic Impact Fees 116,000 780,000 - - 996,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 580,000 3,900,000 - - 4,980,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 330,000 - - - 830,000 Right of Way 250,000 - - - 250,000 Construction - 3,900,000 - - 3,900,000 580,000 3,900,000 - - 4,980,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will improve the 3rd Street NW/NE/4th Street NE corridor through downtown Auburn. The project elements include the realignment of side street approaches, associated traffic signal upgrades, at the signalized intersections along the corridor, and illumination, ADA, and pavement rehabilitation along the corridor. The improvements will improve traffic operations at the intersection with A Street NW by removing the need to operate the north/south approaches with split phase due to the existing offset, will add a northbound left-turn movement at the intersection with Auburn Avenue, and realign the intersection of 4th St NE with Auburn Way North to eliminate another split phase operation signal, improving circulation and access. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding application for design and ROW phases was submitted in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 56 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to AWS)TIP # 60 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 6 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other(Development)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 925,000 3,750,000 - 4,675,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000 REET2 - - - - Other(Development)- 250,000 250,000 - 500,000 - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 650,000 - - 650,000 Right of Way - 1,275,000 - - 1,275,000 Construction - - 4,750,000 - 4,750,000 - 1,925,000 4,750,000 - 6,675,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Widen M Street SE into a multi-lane arterial between 8th St SE and AWS. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $8,000. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 57 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 29th St SE/R St SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 63 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 16, 27 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 1,300,000 - - 1,300,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 500,000 - - 600,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 1,800,000 - - 1,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 350,000 - - 450,000 Right of Way - 450,000 - - 450,000 Construction - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 100,000 1,800,000 - - 1,900,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project funds the design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at the 29th St SE/R St SE intersection. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 58 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE) TIP # 64 Project No:asbd18 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 430,000 150,000 100,000 - 680,000 Other - - - - - 430,000 150,000 100,000 - 680,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 150,000 100,000 - 250,000 Right of Way 430,000 - - - 430,000 Construction - - - - - 430,000 150,000 100,000 - 680,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 1,950,000 8,000,000 - 9,950,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 500,000 2,000,000 - 2,600,000 Other - - - - - - 2,450,000 10,000,000 - 12,550,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 1,950,000 - - 2,050,000 Right of Way - 500,000 - - 500,000 Construction - - 10,000,000 - 10,000,000 - 2,450,000 10,000,000 - 12,550,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Widen the existing roadway to provide a four-lane cross section pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The project includes widening the Green River Bridge. Progress Summary: Three parcels along the future roadway alignment were procured in 2014. Corridor pre-design effort is planned to begin in late 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $18,300 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 59 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) TIP # 65 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 2,900,000 7,100,000 10,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 600,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 Other - - - - - - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 Right of Way - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Construction - - 8,500,000 8,500,000 - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Project includes widening the existing roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $24,100. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 60 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) TIP # 66 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - 750,000 750,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 250,000 250,000 Other - - - - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 500,000 500,000 Right of Way - - - 500,000 500,000 Construction - - - - - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Project includes widening the existing roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $20,300. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 61 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: BNSF & A St SE Pedestrian Crossing Improvements TIP # 67 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity, Safety, Non-Motorized Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 400,000 3,500,000 3,900,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 250,000 1,400,000 1,650,000 Other - - - - - - 650,000 4,900,000 5,550,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 650,000 - 650,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 4,900,000 4,900,000 - - 650,000 4,900,000 5,550,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will fund the permitting, design, and construction of a new pedestrian underpass of the BNSF Railway mainline tracks south of 41st St SE and a new signalized pedestrian crossing of A St SE. This project is needed to improve pedestrian walking routes and safety. Progress Summary: Consultant feasibility analysis was completed to refine project scope, alignment, and identify design issues. Future project phases will be completed when grant funding is secured. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 62 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 22nd Street NE & I St NE Intersection TIP # 69 Project No:cp1513 Project Type:Capacity (Safety) Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 21 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 25,000 - - 25,000 Grants- Secured State 1,712 198,288 - - 200,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 940,000 - Traffic Impact Fees 2,872 52,128 - 235,000 55,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 4,584 275,416 - 1,175,000 280,000 Capital Expenditures: Pre-Design 4,584 - - - 4,584 Design - 275,416 - - 275,416 Construction - - - 1,175,000 - 4,584 275,416 - 1,175,000 280,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - 940,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 235,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 1,175,000 Capital Expenditures: Pre-Design - - - - - Design - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,175,000 - - - - 1,175,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project includes the design and construction of a modern roundabout at the 22nd Street NE and I Street NE intersection. This is currently a 4-way stop controlled intersection. Progress Summary: State grant was awarded for design in 2015. Construction phase is dependent on securing future grants or other local funding. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 63 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: West Valley Highway Improvements (SR-18 to 15th Street SW)TIP # 72 Project No:asbd20 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 35 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 100,000 - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 100,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 100,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 100,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)400,000 2,000,000 - - 2,400,000 Traffic Impact Fees 100,000 500,000 - - 700,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 500,000 2,500,000 - - 3,100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 500,000 - - - 600,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 500,000 2,500,000 - - 3,100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project scope includes pavement rehabilitation and re-channelization, pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, improved roadway lighting, required storm system improvements, intersection signal replacement at 15th St SW, and Intelligent Transportation System Improvements. Progress Summary: Survey, base mapping and pre-design are planned to be completed in 2018 to complete preliminary plans and refine project cost-estimate. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 64 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor)TIP # 73 Project No:asbd25 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:City of Pacific LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 66,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - 34,000 - - - - 100,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 66,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - 34,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This is a City of Pacific project to widen the Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor. This is the final segment of widening in the City of Pacific which will tie in with the City of Sumner's planned final widening segment and new bridge over the White River. Completion of this corridor widening is expected to significantly relieve traffic congestion in Auburn along the A St SE and C St SE corridors. Progress Summary: City of Pacific has initiated preliminary road design and is applying for grant funding to complete the project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no future impact to Auburn's operating budgets. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 65 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A St Traffic Signal Improvements TIP # 2 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 250,000 - - 375,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- 650,000 - - 650,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - 125,000 900,000 - - 1,025,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 125,000 - - - 125,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 900,000 - - 900,000 125,000 900,000 - - 1,025,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will replace two A St traffic signals at E Main Street and 2nd St SE. These are two of the oldest signals in the City that have both exceeded their serviceable life span. New signal improvements will match the City's new decorative downtown standard, meet ADA accessibility requirements, and include battery backup power supplies. Progress Summary: Design is scheduled to be completed in 2019. Preliminary underground improvements have been completed at each intersection in advance of the project. Portions of this project are being completed by adjacent development. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 66 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way Corridor (4th St NE to 4th St SE) TIP # 3 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2, 3 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 110,000 600,000 - 710,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 708,700 2,400,000 - 3,108,700 REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - 818,700 3,000,000 - 3,818,700 Capital Expenditures: Design - 618,700 - - 618,700 Right of Way - 200,000 - - 200,000 Construction - - 3,000,000 - 3,000,000 - 818,700 3,000,000 - 3,818,700 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project is based on a pre-design study to improve pedestrian accessibility, appearance, and link the downtown area along Auburn Way South between 4th Street NE and 4th Street SE. The project may include some pavement repairs. However, an overlay was completed as part of the City's Arterial Pavement Preservation Program in 2007. Although this was considered a temporary fix, the scope has been modified to account for the pavement work. The project is approximately 0.5 miles long. Progress Summary: The pavement portion has been minimized due to the work completed in 2007 under the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 67 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SE & 29th Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements TIP # 18 Project No:asbd21 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - - 100,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 300,000 - - 300,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 400,000 - - 400,000 - 400,000 - - 400,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project includes the design and construction of a new traffic signal. Progress Summary: M St SE & 29th St SE is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection, experiences significant congestion in the peak traffic hours, and has a documented high collision history. Design is scheduled to be initiated in 2016. Construction will be completed when project is fully funded. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 68 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way North/1st Street NE Signal Improvements TIP # 19 Project No:asbd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - - - 175,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)425,000 - - - 425,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET - - - - - 550,000 - - - 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Right of Way 50,000 - - - 50,000 Construction 500,000 - - - 500,000 550,000 - - - 600,000 Grants / Other Sources:Grant funds are unsecure. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Description: This project will construct a new traffic signal with controller cabinet and battery backup along with necessary intersection improvements. Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2018. Construction will be completed when funding is secured. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 69 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: R Street SE & 21st Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements TIP # 20 Project No:asbd22 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 75,000 - 75,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 75,000 - - 75,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 75,000 - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 75,000 - - 75,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - - 100,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 700,000 - - 700,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 800,000 - - 800,000 - 800,000 - - 800,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project includes the design and construction of intersection safety improvements. Progress Summary: R St SE & 21st St SE is currently a two-way stop controlled intersection, experiences significant congestion in the peak traffic hours, and has a documented high collision history. Analysis to determine appropriate intersection control and design is scheduled to be completed in 2016. Construction will be completed when project is fully funded. Interim improvements are being constructed in 2016 to improve the pedestrian crossing in partnership with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 70 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: W Main Street & C St Traffic Signal Upgrade TIP # 21 Project No:cp1406 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba LOS Corridor ID# 11 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 320,000 20,000 - 340,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees 26,856 123,144 - - 150,000 Other - - - - - 26,856 443,144 20,000 - 490,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 26,856 20,000 - - 46,856 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 423,144 20,000 - 443,144 26,856 443,144 20,000 - 490,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 20,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: Reconstruct the existing traffic signal at C St NW and W Main Street. The new C St NW signal will provide protected left- turn phasing for C Street, and will provide additional safety related to the railroad pre-emption. Progress Summary: Design started in 2014 and construction is expected to start in 2016. This project scope was modified in 2016 to construct only the new traffic signal at C St and W Main St. The traffic signal at Auburn Ave and E Main St is included in TIP#2 and will be designed and constructed after the completion of the Main Street Urban Design Concept has been completed and approved. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 71 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements TIP # 23 Project No:asbd26 Project Type:Non-Motorized Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 27 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 125,000 - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - 125,000 - - - - 250,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 250,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 250,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - - - 250,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)1,250,000 - - - 1,250,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)125,000 - - - 250,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,750,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project is planned as a partnership between the City of Auburn and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to improve pedestrian safety by constructing sidewalks, street lighting, and related storm improvements on Riverwalk Drive SE between Auburn Way S and Howard Road SE. This project will close a major gap in the sidewalk system and ties into the proposed improvements on Auburn Way South. Progress Summary: Design is anticipated to begin in 2018. Construction will be completed when funds are available. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $10,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 72 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street SE Safety Improvements Study TIP # 27 Project No:cp1110 Project Type:Safety (Non-Capacity) Project Manager:James Webb LOS Corridor ID# 10,33 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,230 50,000 5,000 - 56,230 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,230 50,000 5,000 - 56,230 Capital Expenditures: Design 1,230 50,000 5,000 - 56,230 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 1,230 50,000 5,000 - 56,230 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 5,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 5,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 5,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Study the A Street SE corridor between 6th Street SE and Lakeland Hills Way SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study will review the safety and access needs of the traveling public and the adjacent properties. Progress Summary: In-house pre-design was completed to refine project scope, alignment, and identify design issues. 2016 design will complete conceptual corridor plan for future improvements. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This study will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 73 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements TIP # 29 Project No:asbd27 Project Type:Environmental Monitoring Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 15 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured Federal - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 20,000 - Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 20,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Environmental - - - 20,000 - Construction - - - - - - - - 20,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - Other - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Environmental 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Construction - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will complete the environmental monitoring requirements related to the S 277th St corridor widening project between Auburn Way North and l St NE. Progress Summary: 10 year monitoring period is expected to begin in 2018 after final completion. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact on future operating budgets. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 74 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program TIP # 30 Project No:asbd08, cp1615 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:Pablo Para LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 75,000 100,000 100,000 175,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - 75,000 100,000 100,000 175,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 5,000 10,000 10,000 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 70,000 90,000 90,000 160,000 - 75,000 100,000 100,000 175,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Description: This is an annual program to fund small pedestrian improvement projects at locations throughout the City. Projects are prioritized annually based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies, and citizen requests. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 75 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements TIP # 31 Project No:asbd07 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Safety) Project Manager:Various LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 90,000 - 90,000 90,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 10,000 - 10,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 90,000 90,000 270,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This is a bi-annual program to fund bicycle and safety improvements on classified roadways. Projects are prioritized annually based upon field studies and community feedback. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 76 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Downtown Transit Center Access Improvements TIP # 44 Project No:asbd28 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Transit Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# xx Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 10,000 110,000 10,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 40,000 440,000 480,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 50,000 550,000 490,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - 100,000 - Construction - - - 450,000 - - - 50,000 550,000 50,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 120,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 480,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - 100,000 Construction - - - - 450,000 - - - - 600,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will modify channelization and curb radii to improve turning radii for transit vehicles at the southwest corner of S Division St & 3rd St SW, and the southeast corner of A St SW & 2nd St SW. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be minimal. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 77 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP # 50 Project No:asbd16 Project Type:Non-Capacity (ITS) Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 100,000 30,000 100,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 120,000 - REET - 100,000 - - 100,000 PWTFL - - - - - Other (MIT)- 50,000 - - 50,000 - 150,000 100,000 150,000 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 15,000 10,000 15,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 135,000 90,000 135,000 225,000 - 150,000 100,000 150,000 250,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 30,000 30,000 30,000 - 220,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal 120,000 120,000 120,000 - 480,000 REET - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 15,000 15,000 15,000 - 70,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 135,000 135,000 135,000 - 630,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 700,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project funds the design and construction of Dynamic Message Signs at various locations throughout the City. Dynamic message signs are an important Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) tool for providing information to roadway users. Priority locations for sign placement are based on the Comprehensive Transportation Plan ITS map and include Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway and Lea Hill Road. Progress Summary: The first phase of this project is scheduled to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 78 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M St SE Storm Improvements TIP # 58 Project No:CP1511 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation, Non-Motorized Project Manager:Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 125,000 - 125,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET - 150,000 - - 150,000 PWTFL - - - - - Other (105 Fund)- 150,000 50,000 - 200,000 - 300,000 175,000 - 475,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 30,000 - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 270,000 175,000 - 445,000 - 300,000 175,000 - 475,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 125,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Other (105 Fund)- - - - 50,000 - - - - 175,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: In partnership with a city utility project, this project will complete pavement, sidewalk, and street lighting improvements on M St SE between 3rd St SE and E Main St. Progress Summary: Project design was completed in 2016 and construction is scheduled to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 79 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: AWS Streetscape Improvements (SR-18 to M St SE)TIP # 62 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Miscellaneous Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- 1,750,000 2,600,000 - 4,350,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 500,000 - - 500,000 Right of Way - 1,450,000 - - 1,450,000 Construction - 2,800,000 - 2,800,000 - 1,950,000 2,800,000 - 4,750,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will revitalize and beautify AWS from the SR-18 interchange to the intersection with M Street SE. Proposed improvements include: enhancement of crosswalks and pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sidewalks; curb and gutter; pedestrian ramps; new landscaped medians; street trees; new lighting; pedestrian benches; trash receptacles; recycling containers and other appropriate amenities. A significant portion of project costs are associated with right-of-way acquisition. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $10,000. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 80 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street SE & 37th Street SE Intersection Improvements TIP # 68 Project No:cp1502 Project Type:Intersection Improvement, Non-capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba LOS Corridor ID# 10 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,933 53,067 - - 55,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal 8,295 600,000 183,965 - 792,260 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other (Arterial Preserv. Fund 105)- 87,240 - 87,240 10,228 740,307 183,965 - 934,500 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,228 135,272 - - 145,500 Right of Way - 66,400 - - 66,400 Construction - 538,635 183,965 - 722,600 10,228 740,307 183,965 - 934,500 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - 183,965 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other (Arterial Preserv. Fund 105)- - - - - - - - - 183,965 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 183,965 - - - - 183,965 Grants / Other Sources:Other Funds are Fund 105 Arterial Preservation Funds Description: Widen the intersection for a U-turn, install an interconnected traffic signal, overlay the intersection, and upgrade curb ramps. Progress Summary: Federal Grant was awarded in 2014. Arterial Preservation Fund 105 will participate in this project to overlay portions of A St SE. Budget for 2016 includes 10% local match; there is a potential of receiving 100% grant funding for the construction phase if project is advertised by September 30, 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 81 TABLE T- 2A CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – LOCAL STREET 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: None - Non-Capacity Projects: 1 Local Street Improvement Program Capital Costs 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 500,000 500,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Sales Tax on Construction 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 9,300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Utility Mitigation - - - - - - - SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 Total Costs 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 500,000 500,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Sales Tax on Construction 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 9,300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Utility Mitigation - - - - - - - Total Funding 2,400,000 2,400,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 82 LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program TIP# 37 Project No:Various Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Local Street Fund - 226,768 500,000 500,000 726,768 Transfer In 300,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 600,000 Property Tax - - - - Sales Tax on Construction 3,653,965 2,000,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 7,403,965 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 3,953,965 2,376,768 2,400,000 2,400,000 8,730,733 Capital Expenditures: Design 600,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 3,353,965 2,076,768 2,100,000 2,100,000 7,530,733 3,953,965 2,376,768 2,400,000 2,400,000 8,730,733 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Local Street Fund - - - - 1,000,000 Transfer In 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Property Tax - - Sales Tax on Construction 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 9,300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,600,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 1,350,000 9,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 1,600,000 11,200,000 Description: The program preserves local (unclassified) streets. The work includes crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre-leveling, asphalt overlays and roadway reconstruction. Beginning in 2013, funding sources include annual sales tax on construction. Progress Summary: This program has successfully completed overlays, chip seals and complete reconstructions since 2005. The program will focus on reconstruction in 2017 and 2018. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 83 TABLE T- 2B CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – STREET PRESERVATION 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: None - Non-Capacity Projects: 1 Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation Capital Costs 828,470 - - - - - 828,470 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 176,370 - - - - - 176,370 Grants 652,100 - - - - - 652,100 Utility Tax - - - - - - - 2 Annual Arterial Street Preservation Program Capital Costs 500,000 900,000 836,720 1,017,560 1,800,000 1,800,000 6,854,280 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Utility Tax 500,000 900,000 836,720 1,017,560 1,800,000 1,800,000 6,854,280 3 Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Utility Tax 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 4 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE) Capital Costs 120,000 1,508,000 - - - - 1,628,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 120,000 618,280 - - - - 738,280 Utility Tax - - - - - - - Grants - 889,720 - - - - 889,720 5 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (8th St NE to 4th St SE) Capital Costs - 222,440 1,727,840 - - - 1,950,280 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - 111,220 863,920 - - - 975,140 Utility Tax - - - - - - - Grants - 111,220 863,920 - - - 975,140 6 A St SE Preservation (E Main St to 17th St SE) Capital Costs - - 198,720 1,564,880 - - 1,763,600 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - 99,360 782,440 - - 881,800 Utility Tax - - - - - - - Grants - - 99,360 782,440 - - 881,800 7 B St NW Reconstruction (37th St NW to 49th St NW) Capital Costs 1,470,000 - - - - - 1,470,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 1,470,000 - - - - - 1,470,000 Utility Tax - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - 8 15th Street NE/NW Preservation (SR-167 to 8th Street NE) Capital Costs 1,500,000 - - - - - 1,500,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 450,000 - - - - - 450,000 REET 2 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 Grants 750,000 - - - - - 750,000 Note: Financial plan utilizes the following order for use of funds to finance projects: grant revenues (if available), utility tax revenues and fund balance. SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 4,518,470 2,730,440 2,863,280 2,682,440 1,900,000 1,900,000 16,594,630 Total Costs 4,518,470 2,730,440 2,863,280 2,682,440 1,900,000 1,900,000 16,594,630 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 2,216,370 729,500 963,280 782,440 - - 4,691,590 Utility Tax 600,000 1,000,000 936,720 1,117,560 1,900,000 1,900,000 7,454,280 Grants 1,402,100 1,000,940 963,280 782,440 - - 4,148,760 REET 2 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 Total Funding 4,518,470 2,730,440 2,863,280 2,682,440 1,900,000 1,900,000 16,594,630 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 84 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation TIP #22 Project No:cp1523 STIP# AUB-51 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Jai Carter Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund Balance - 26,480 176,370 - 202,850 Grants- Secured Federal - 97,900 652,100 - 750,000 Utility Tax - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 124,380 828,470 - 952,850 Capital Expenditures: Design - 124,380 - - 124,380 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 828,470 - 828,470 - 124,380 828,470 - 952,850 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund Balance - - - - 176,370 Grants- Secured Federal - - - - 652,100 Utility Tax - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 828,470 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 828,470 - - - - 828,470 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The Lake Tapps Parkway Preservation project will complete a patch and overlay of pavement between the Auburn/Sumner city limit and Lakeland Hills Way including all required ADA improvements to curb ramps, sidewalks, and pedestrian signals. Progress Summary: Federal Grant was secured in 2014. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 85 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Annual Arterial Street Preservation Program TIP #35 Project No:cp1402, cp1516, spbd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Property Tax - - - - - Utility Tax 4,106,338 478,699 500,000 900,000 5,085,037 REET2 - - - - - Other (ICON)132,000 - - - 132,000 4,238,338 478,699 500,000 900,000 5,217,037 Capital Expenditures: Design 200,000 - 50,000 50,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 4,038,338 478,699 450,000 850,000 5,817,037 4,238,338 478,699 500,000 900,000 5,217,037 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Property Tax - - - - - Utility Tax 836,720 1,017,560 1,800,000 1,800,000 6,854,280 REET2 - - - - - Other (ICON)- - - - - 836,720 1,017,560 1,800,000 1,800,000 6,854,280 Capital Expenditures: Design 36,720 117,560 120,000 120,000 494,280 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 800,000 900,000 1,680,000 1,680,000 6,360,000 836,720 1,017,560 1,800,000 1,800,000 6,854,280 Grants / Other Sources: Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified streets citywide. These projects may include a combination of overlays, rebuilds, and spot repairs. This program is funded through a 1% utility tax that was adopted by City Council during 2008. Progress Summary: Program continues to successfully complete annual patching and overlay projects citywide. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 86 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Annual Arterial Crack Seal Program TIP #36 Project No:spbd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Utility Tax 174,318 100,000 100,000 100,000 374,318 REET - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 174,318 100,000 100,000 100,000 374,318 Capital Expenditures: Design 13,738 10,000 10,000 10,000 33,738 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 160,580 90,000 90,000 90,000 340,580 174,318 100,000 100,000 100,000 374,318 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Utility Tax 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 REET - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 540,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Description: Implement regular maintenance of various classified streets by sealing newly formed cracks. Sealing the cracks will prolong the life of the pavement by stopping water from draining into the sub-base of the road. Progress Summary: Program continues to successfully extend pavement life citywide. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 87 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE)TIP # 46 Project No:spbd04 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 1/2 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - 120,000 618,280 120,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 889,720 - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - 120,000 1,508,000 120,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 120,000 - 120,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,508,000 - - - 120,000 1,508,000 120,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 738,280 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - 889,720 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 1,628,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 120,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,508,000 - - - - 1,628,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from 8th Street NE to 22nd Street NE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding was applied for in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 88 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (8th St NE to 4th St SE)TIP # 47 Project No:spbd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 2 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - 111,220 - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - 111,220 - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - 222,440 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 222,440 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 222,440 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 863,920 - - - 975,140 Grants- Unsecured Federal 863,920 - - - 975,140 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 1,727,840 - - - 1,950,280 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 222,440 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,727,840 - - - 1,727,840 1,727,840 - - - 1,950,280 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from approximately 8th Street NE to approximately 4th St SE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding was applied for in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 89 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A St SE Preservation (E Main St to 17th St SE)TIP # 48 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 99,360 782,440 - - 881,800 Grants- Unsecured Federal 99,360 782,440 - - 881,800 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 198,720 1,564,880 - - 1,763,600 Capital Expenditures: Design 198,720 - - - 198,720 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,564,880 - - 1,564,880 198,720 1,564,880 - - 1,763,600 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will grind and overlay A St SE between E Main St and 17th St SE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding was applied for in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 90 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: B St NW Reconstruction (37th St NW to 49th St NW)TIP # 70 Project No:cp1520 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Pavement Reconstruction Project Manager:Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# 21 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - 300,734 1,470,000 - 1,770,734 Grants- Secured Federal - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 300,734 1,470,000 - 1,770,734 Capital Expenditures: Design - 300,734 - - 300,734 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,470,000 - 1,470,000 - 300,734 1,470,000 - 1,770,734 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 1,470,000 Grants- Secured Federal - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 1,470,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,470,000 - - - - 1,470,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The project will reconstruct the failed pavement section between 37th ST NW and north of 49th St NW. Progress Summary: Design began in 2016. construction is scheduled for 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 91 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 15th Street NE/NW Preservation (SR-167 to 8th Street NE)TIP # 71 Project No:CP1521 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# 9 Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - 67,500 450,000 - 517,500 Grants- Secured Federal - 67,500 750,000 - 817,500 Utility Tax - - - - - REET 2 - - 300,000 - 300,000 - 135,000 1,500,000 - 1,635,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 135,000 - - 135,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 - 135,000 1,500,000 - 1,635,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 450,000 Grants- Secured Federal - - - - 750,000 Utility Tax - - - - - REET 2 - - - - 300,000 - - - - 1,500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,500,000 - - - - 1,500,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project proposes to grind and overlay 15th Street NW/NE from the SR167 to Auburn Way N; and grind and overlay Harvey Road NE from Auburn Way N to 8th Street NE. The project will restore 7.57 lane miles of pavement, upgrade 30 curb ramps to meet current ADA standard, as well as remove unused driveway openings as an upgrade to non ADA compliant pedestrian facilities. The project funds the design, coordination, permitting, and construction of the pavement preservation project. Progress Summary: Federal grant was secured in 2014. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no impact to the street maintenance budget. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 92 TABLE T-3 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 A Street NW, Phase 1 25,830$ 25,830$ 25,830$ 25,830$ 25,830$ 25,830$ 154,980$ 2 M Street Underpass 21,827 21,827 21,827 21,827 21,827 21,827 130,962 3 S 277th St Corridor Capacity 27,250 27,250 27,250 27,250 27,250 27,250 163,500 4 F Street SE, Downtown to Les Gove - 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 20,500 5 M Street NE, E. Main to 4th - - 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 6,000 6 M St SE & 12th St SE Traffic Signal - - - 6,600 6,600 6,600 19,800 7 8th Street NE Widening - - - 600 600 600 1,800 8 Academy Drive Multi-Use Trail - - - - 25,000 25,000 50,000 9 46th Place S Realignment - - - - 1,750 1,750 3,500 10 C St SW & 15th St SW Int. Imp.- - - - 2,500 2,500 5,000 11 124th Ave SE Corridor & 320th Imp.- - - - 2,500 2,500 5,000 12 124th Ave SE Corridor Imp. -Phase 2 - - - - 3,500 3,500 7,000 13 R Street Bypass - - - - - 2,500 2,500 14 Lake Tapps Pkwy ITS Expansion 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 15 M St SE Corridor, 8th St SE to AWS - - - - 8,000 8,000 16,000 16 Lea Hill RD Segment 1 - - - - 18,300 18,300 36,600 17 Lea Hill RD Segment 2 - - - - - 24,100 24,100 18 BNSF & A St SE Pedestrian Crossing Imp.- - - - - 5,500 5,500 19 M St SE & 29th St SE Int. Safety Imp.- - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 20 R St SE & 21st St SE Int. Safety Imp.- - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 15,000 21 Riverwalk Dr SE Non-Motorized Imp.- - 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 22 ITS Dynamic Message Signs - - - - 5,000 5,000 10,000 23 AWS Streetscape Improvements - - - - 10,000 10,000 20,000 24 A St SE & 37 St SE Int. Improvements 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 15,000 Total 82,407$ 86,507$ 98,007$ 115,207$ 191,757$ 223,857$ 797,742$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 93 WATER Current Facilities The City of Auburn water utility provides water supply, treatment, transmission, stor age, distribution, and service connections to in-City residences and businesses. The City also provides water to the City of Algona and Water District #111 under wholesale agreements. The water system consists of wells, springs and interties for source; chlorination stations and corrosion control for treatment; pump stations, pressure reducing stations and pipelines for transmission; and steel and concrete enclosed reservoirs for storage. Table W -1, “Facilities Inventory”, lists the facilities along with their current capacities and approximate locations. Level of Service (LOS) The City’s Comprehensive Water Plan summarizes the design criteria and service polices for the City’s water distribution system. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City of Auburn’s water system anticipates six capacity projects in the amount of $13,826,173 and twenty-nine non-capacity projects totaling $24,096,400 for a 6-year planning expectation total of $37,922,573. The financing plan is shown in Table W -2 followed by individual worksheets showing the project details. The capacity projects will increase water supply quantities, storage, and distribution for growth of retail customers. The non-capacity projects will provide for pipeline improvements and replacements, delivery pressure improvements, water quality enhancements, comprehensive and resource management planning, pump station upgrades, telemetry system improvements, and meter upgrades. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table W -3 shows, operating budget impacts of $2,400 are forecasted for water supply and distribution facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 94 TABLE W-1 Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY WATER RIGHT (MGD - max rate)LOCATION Water Supply: Coal Creek Springs Certificate 857 9.70<2.52>*3401 Stuck River Rd Well 1 Certificate 3560-A 3.17 1136 M St SE Well 2 G1-00277 C 3.46 1109 5th St NE Well 3A G1-23629 C 4.03 401 37th St SE Well 3B (Included Above)(Included Above)401 37th St SE Well 4 G1-20391 C 4.03 950 25th St SE Well 5 G1-23633 C 1.44 5530 James Ave SE Well 5A (Included Above)(Included Above)5401 Olive Way SE Well 5B (Included Above)(Included Above)West end of 62nd Ct SE Well 6 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4)5.04 (supplemental)1109 5th St NE Well 7 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4)5.04 (supplemental)405 E St NE West Hill Springs Claim (1973 File Date)0.9 1900 15th St NW Ext Supply Total (MGD)26.73 Available for Use 24.21 * Denotes deduction of 1,750 gpm (Qi/2,824 ac-ft/yr) to comply with the provisions of the Muckleshoot-Auburn Stipulated Agreement. CAPACITY FACILITY (MGD)LOCATION SERVICE AREA Intertie Tacoma B Street NW 3.2 3240 B St NW Valley Service Area Tacoma 132nd Ave SE 3.2 29598 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Intertie Total (MGD)6.4 CAPACITY FACILITY (MG)LOCATION SERVICE AREA Storage Facilities: Academy Reservoir 8A 1.0 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Academy Reservoir 8B 1.5 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Lakeland Hills Reservoir 5 1.0 1326 57th Dr SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6 1.0 5718 Francis Ct SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Lea Hill Reservoir 4A 1.0 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Lea Hill Reservoir 4B 1.5 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Valley Reservoir 1 5.0 2003 Auburn Way S Valley Service Area Valley Reservoir 2 3.6 32115 105th Place S Valley Service Area Storage Total (MG)15.6 CITY OF AUBURN WATER SYSTEM City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 95 TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Booster Pump Stations: Academy 1: 2 pumps 800 2004 Auburn Way S Academy 2: 2 pumps 1,500 2004 Auburn Way S Academy East: 6 pumps 2,820 5031 Auburn Way S Green River: 4 pumps 4,680 29621 Green River Rd SE Intertie: 7 pumps 4,830 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2,100 10406 Lea Hill Rd SE Lakeland Hills: 5 pumps 3,200 1118 57th Place SE Wilderness Game Farm Pk: 2 pumps 1,050 2401 Stuck River Rd Terrace View: 3 pumps 1,500 6134 Alexander Place SE CAPACITY Primary Valve FACILITY (PSI - Inlet/Outlet)LOCATION Pressure Reducing Stations: Serves Valley Pressure Zone: B Street Intertie 88/55 3300 B St NW Howard Road CCF #1011-10 82/65 Howard Rd Howard Road CCF By-Pass #1011-20 -Howard Rd (Bypass) 25th Street SE #1110-10 (Offline)-25th St SE & K St SE Riverwalk #1111-20 90/50 27th St. SE & 27th Place SE Riverwalk #1111-10 115/80 Riverwalk Dr SE & Howard Rd Serves Lea Hill: 132nd Avenue Intertie 150/70 132nd Ave SE & 295th St Amber View North #711-10 150/65 105th Pl SE & 320th Pl Amber View South #711-20 142/60 106th Pl SE Near Reservoir 2 Carriage Square Lower #611-10 165/55 Lea Hill Rd SE Carriage Square Middle #611-20 140/55 Lea Hill Rd & 106 Pl Carriage Square Upper #611-30 145/50 Lea Hill Rd & 107 Pl Cobble Creek Lower #411-20 86/40 SE 304th Pl & SE 101st Place Cobble Creek Upper #411-10 94/55 104th Ave SE (South of 303rd Road) Lea Hill #412-10 84/45 SE 298th Place & 109 Ave SE Lea Hill #412-30 N/C 300 Block & 108th Ave SE Lea Hill #511-10 87/45 304th St. SE West of 108th Ave Lea Hill #512-10 80/60 304th St. SE West of 112th Ave Serves Academy: Auburn Way South #1011-30 130/80 2003 Auburn Way S Auburn Way South #1114-10 88/55 4500 Auburn Way S City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 96 TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY Primary Valve FACILITY (PSI - Inlet/Outlet)LOCATION Serves Lakeland Hills: Lakeland Hills #1309-10 120/55 Mill Pond Dr @ Oravetz Rd Lakeland Hills #1310-10 130/55 Mill Pond Dr & Mill Pond Loop Lakeland Hills #1409-10 N/C Oravetz & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1409-20 120/56 47th SE & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1409-30 95/70 Lakeland Hills Way & Lakeland Hills Lp Lakeland Hills #1409-40 84/55 Mill Pond Dr & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1410-10 103/50 4900 Block & Mill Pond Dr Lakeland Hills #1410-20 N/C 51st St. SE east of Mill Pond Loop Lakeland Hills #1410-30 125/70 Nathan Ave & Highland Dr Lakeland Hills #1410-40 82/55 Quincy Ave N of 53rd St SE Lakeland Hills #1411-10 80/42 Bennett Ave & 56th Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-20 82/55 5314 Bennett Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-30 155/73 5100 Kersey Way Lakeland Hills #1411-40 82/52 54th St SE Lakeland Hills #1411-50 85/44 Westly Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1412-10 82/55 5539 Franklin Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1509-10 174/60 Terrace View Lower (6170) Lakeland Hills #1509-20 160/73 Terrace View Middle (5960) Lakeland Hills #1509-30 138/47 Terrace View Upper (5810) Lakeland Hills #1509-40 230/90 Terrace View & Alexander Place SE Lakeland Hills #1510-10 N/C Lakeland Hills Way & Evergreen Way N/C - Normally Closed CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Corrosion Control: Howard Road 5,550 2101 Howard Rd SE Fulmer Field 9,375 1113 5th St NE Chlorination Stations: Coal Creek Springs Station 5,000 (gravity feed)3401 Stuck River Rd West Hill Springs Station 625 (gravity feed)1900 15th St NW Well 1 2,200 1136 M St SE Well 4 2,600 950 25th St SE Well 5A 180 5401 Olive Ave SE Well 5B 600 1100 63rd St SE FACILITY CAPACITY LOCATION Water Supply: Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MGD 4501 47th St SE Storage Facilities: Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MG 4501 47th St SE Booster Pump Stations: Braunwood: 3 Pumps 2.0 GPM 4501 47th St SE BRAUNWOOD SATELLITE WATER SYSTEM City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 97 TABLE W-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING WATER DIVISION 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: 1 Fulmer Well Field Improvements Capital Costs 800,000 - - - - - 800,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 800,000 - - - - - 800,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 2 Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase Capital Costs 252,586 252,586 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Funding Sources: Water Fund 252,586 252,586 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 3 Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement Capital Costs - - 250,000 1,875,000 - - 2,125,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 250,000 1,875,000 - - 2,125,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 4 Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation Capital Costs - 800,000 - - - 2,600,000 3,400,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 800,000 - - - 2,600,000 3,400,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 5 Algona Well 1 Decommissioning Capital Costs - 39,000 - - - - 39,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 39,000 - - - - 39,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 6 Annual Distribution System Improvements Program Capital Costs 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 3,900,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 3,900,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,352,586 2,091,586 802,586 3,809,805 1,234,805 4,534,805 13,826,173 Non-Capacity Projects: 7 Green River PS Emergency Power Capital Costs - 90,000 600,000 - - - 690,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 90,000 600,000 - - - 690,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 8 Well Inspection and Redevelopment Program Capital Costs 150,000 - 150,000 - - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 150,000 - 150,000 - - - 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 98 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 9 Water Repair & Replacements Capital Costs - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 10 MIT Master Meters Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 11 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 12 Lea Hill PRV Station Improvements Capital Costs 625,000 - - - - - 625,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 625,000 - - - - - 625,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 13 Water Meter & Billing System Improvements Capital Costs 3,095,000 100,000 - - - - 3,195,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 3,095,000 100,000 - - - - 3,195,000 14 Utilities Field Operations Center Capital Costs 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Other -Sewer Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Other -Storm Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 15 West Hill Springs Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 16 Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation Capital Costs - - 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 17 Lea Hill - 132nd Ave Distribution System Modifications Capital Costs - - 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 18 Auburn Way South - Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 99 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 19 Reservoir Painting Capital Costs - - - - 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 20 Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main Replacement Capital Costs 63,400 1,300,000 - - - - 1,363,400 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 DWSRF Loan 63,400 1,050,000 - - - - 1,113,400 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 21 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 22 M Street SE Storm Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 23 Reservoir Repair and Replacements Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 24 Pipeline Asset Management Study Capital Costs - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 25 22nd Street NE & I Street NE Intersection Capital Costs - 285,000 - - - - 285,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 285,000 - - - - 285,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 26 Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements Capital Costs - 50,000 - 430,000 - - 480,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 50,000 - 430,000 - - 480,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 27 M Street NE Widening Capital Costs 10,000 20,000 125,000 - - - 155,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 20,000 125,000 - - - 155,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 28 Auburn Way South - Hemlock Street SE to Academy Drive SE Capital Costs - - - 200,000 50,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 200,000 50,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 100 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 29 Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE) Capital Costs - - - 75,000 550,000 - 625,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 75,000 550,000 - 625,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 30 Decommission Lea Hill Pump Station Capital Costs - - - 83,000 - - 83,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 83,000 - - 83,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 31 Deduct Meter Replacement Program Capital Costs - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 32 Comprehensive Water Plan Capital Costs - - - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 33 Lea Hill AC Main Replacement Capital Costs - - - 200,000 2,500,000 - 2,700,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 200,000 2,500,000 - 2,700,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 34 Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) Capital Costs - - - - 110,000 1,100,000 1,210,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - 110,000 1,100,000 1,210,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 35 Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) Capital Costs - - - - - 130,000 130,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 130,000 130,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 4,833,400 2,945,000 3,182,500 2,945,500 6,360,000 3,830,000 24,096,400 SUMMARY: 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 1,352,586 2,091,586 802,586 3,809,805 1,234,805 4,534,805 13,826,173 Non-Capacity Projects 4,833,400 2,945,000 3,182,500 2,945,500 6,360,000 3,830,000 24,096,400 Total Costs 6,185,986 5,036,586 3,985,086 6,755,305 7,594,805 8,364,805 37,922,573 FUNDING SOURCES: Water Fund 2,827,586 3,886,586 3,985,086 6,755,305 7,594,805 8,364,805 33,414,173 Other- Sewer Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Other- Storm Fund 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 DWSRF Loan 63,400 1,050,000 - - - - 1,113,400 Bond Proceeds 3,095,000 100,000 - - - - 3,195,000 Total Funding 6,185,986 5,036,586 3,985,086 6,755,305 7,594,805 8,364,805 37,922,573 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 101 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Fulmer Well Field Improvements Project No:cp1107 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 2,855 517,567 800,000 - 1,320,422 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds 999,893 - - - 999,893 Other - - - - - 1,002,748 517,567 800,000 - 2,320,315 Capital Expenditures: Design 879,062 200,000 - - 1,079,062 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 123,686 317,567 800,000 - 1,241,253 1,002,748 517,567 800,000 - 2,320,315 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 800,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 800,000 - - - - 800,000 Phase I: Evaluate Wells 2, 6 and 7 and the Fulmer Field Corrosion Control Treatment Facility to assess the supply and treatment capacity of the existing facilities and infrastructure. The evaluation will include an assessment of individual and total well supply capacities, along with a review of the treatment facility operating and control parameters. The evaluation will also incorporate recommendations for facility improvements. Phase II: Install well pumps in Wells 2 and 6, new clearwell pumps, and a new SCADA. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID S-19 Progress Summary: Phase I is complete. Phase II will be designed and installed in 2016 and 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Restoration of these wells to full productivity will reduce the need to purchase regional water from Tacoma, a significant annual operating savings. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 102 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase Project No:wabd06 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 252,586 252,586 252,586 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 252,586 252,586 252,586 Capital Expenditures: Water Supply Charges - - 252,586 252,586 252,586 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 252,586 252,586 252,586 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Capital Expenditures: Water Supply Charges 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 252,586 934,805 934,805 934,805 3,562,173 Financing to purchase water from adjacent purveyors to meet projected demand based on agreements with Cascade Water Alliance. Council approved the agreements for permanent and reserve wholesale supply in September 2013. A new agreement with Tacoma was executed in 2014. Budget reflects purchase of permanent supply; reserve supply is not anticipated to be purchased and is not included. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID S-04 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 103 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 250,000 1,875,000 - - 2,125,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 1,875,000 - - 2,125,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,875,000 - - 1,875,000 250,000 1,875,000 - - 2,125,000 The pump station is reaching the end of its useful life. The project will also increase the pump station capacity to meet peak demands and fire flow requirements, and provide backup power generation. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID PS-07 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 104 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation Project No:wabd07 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 800,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 800,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 800,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 800,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 2,600,000 3,400,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 2,600,000 3,400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 800,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,600,000 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 3,400,000 Rehabilitation of the Coal Creek Springs middle collector will improve capacity of the springs resulting in greater utilization of the water right. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-09 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 105 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Algona Well 1 Decommissioning Project No:wabd08 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 39,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 39,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 39,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 39,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 39,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 39,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 39,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 39,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The Algona well has been temporarily abandoned and all related facilities removed. This project will have the well properly decommissioned by a State of Washington-licensed well driller, once the water rights have been transferred to an alternate source. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-14 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 106 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Distribution System Improvements Program Project No:wabd09 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 300,000 - 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,000,000 - - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 3,900,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 3,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 300,000 - 300,000 - 900,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 3,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 3,900,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Program to fund capacity-related improvements to the water distribution system to address low pressures during peak hour demand and fire flows. Design is expected to be completed in one year, followed by construction of those improvements in the subsequent year. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-02 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 107 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Green River Pump Station Emergency Power Project No:wabd10 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 90,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 90,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 90,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 90,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 600,000 - - - 690,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 600,000 - - - 690,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 90,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 600,000 - - - 600,000 600,000 - - - 690,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Construction of facility improvements to house an emergency generator and associated electrical equipment. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID PS-03 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost is estimated to be approximately $600. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 108 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Well Inspection and Redevelopment Program Project No:wabd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 150,000 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 150,000 - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 150,000 150,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 150,000 - - 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 150,000 - - - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 150,000 - - 300,000 150,000 - - - 300,000 No significant impact. Program for inspection and redevelopment of supply wells and springs necessary to ensure production at maximum capacity for efficient utilization. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-07 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 109 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Repair & Replacements Project No:wabd02 Project Type:Non-Capacity (R&R) Project Manager:Various Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 300,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 300,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 300,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 300,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 300,000 - 300,000 900,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 2,000,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,900,000 Program to fund distribution system repair and replacement projects required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Projects will be coordinated with the Local Street Program and other utility projects. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-09 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 110 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Muckleshoot Indian Tribe Master Meters Project No:cp1411 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Chalmers Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 6,260 513,170 10,000 - 529,430 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 6,260 513,170 10,000 - 529,430 Capital Expenditures: Design 6,260 40,000 - - 46,260 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 473,170 10,000 - 483,170 6,260 513,170 10,000 - 529,430 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Install master meters at Muckleshoot Indian Tribe properties to ease account administration. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID G-06 Progress Summary: Design is anticipated to be completed in 2016 and construction is anticipated to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 111 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:wabd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Progress Summary: Planned No significant impact Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 Total Expenditures:- 500,000 500,000 500,000 1,000,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Total Expenditures:500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 3,000,000 Water main improvements in coordination with the Local Street Preservation Program and general arterial street improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-06 Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 112 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill PRV Station Improvements Project No:wabd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 75,000 625,000 - 700,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 75,000 625,000 - 700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 75,000 - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 625,000 - 625,000 - 75,000 625,000 - 700,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 625,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 625,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 625,000 - - - - 625,000 Replace 5 pressure reducing valve stations in the Lea Hill area. Existing stations are old, difficult to access and are typically flooded. They do not have sump pumps or proper drainage to remove water that enters the stations. Maintaining the stations is difficult. This is a potential safety and health issue. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-13 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 113 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Meter & Billing System Improvements Project No:cp1317 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Snyder/Fenhaus Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds 339,407 2,975,000 3,095,000 100,000 6,409,407 Other - - - - - 339,407 2,975,000 3,095,000 100,000 6,409,407 Capital Expenditures: Design 35,662 35,090 - - 70,752 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 303,745 2,939,910 3,095,000 100,000 6,338,655 339,407 2,975,000 3,095,000 100,000 6,409,407 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 3,195,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 3,195,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 3,195,000 - - - - 3,195,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Complete the implementation and construction of selected improvements in automated metering technology, generally referred to as Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI). Benefits include more accurate meter reads, daily information for quicker detection of leaks, and improved efficiency of billing operations. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID G-09 Progress Summary: Study is complete. Installation of meters and metering infrastructure began in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project should decrease the future operating budget through earlier leak detection, reduction in meter inaccuracies and increasing efficiency in billing operations. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 114 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Utilities Field Operations Center Project No:wabd04 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 100,000 - 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other operating - transfer in Sewer - - 100,000 - 100,000 Other operating - transfer in Storm - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - 300,000 - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 300,000 - 300,000 - - 300,000 - 300,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other operating - transfer in Sewer - - - - 100,000 Other operating - transfer in Storm - - - - 100,000 - - - - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 300,000 - - - - 300,000 Construct building for utilities field staff use and storage of field equipment. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID G-05 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 115 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: West Hill Springs Improvements Project No:cp1417 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 8,607 586,393 10,000 - 605,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 8,607 586,393 10,000 - 605,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 8,607 131,393 - - 140,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 455,000 10,000 - 465,000 8,607 586,393 10,000 - 605,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Install flow control valve for automatic shutdown, replace meter, and upgrade reservoir hatches. This project was identified during the Department of Health Sanitary Survey as a health and safety concern. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID S-17 Progress Summary: Design began in late 2015 with construction to be completed in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 116 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants -Unsecured Federal - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000 Grants -Unsecured Federal - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 150,000 - - - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 207,500 357,500 - - 565,000 357,500 357,500 - - 715,000 Install seismic control valves on outlet piping of Reservoirs 1, 2, 4A, 4B, 8A, and 8B. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID R-06 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 117 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill - 132nd Ave Distribution System Modifications Project No:wabd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 400,000 - - 400,000 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Project will add pressure reducing valves and control valves at Lea Hill reservoirs and pump stations, and system valves to provide efficient operation of the 132nd Ave Tacoma Intertie. Project will also include additional piping within Intertie/Lea Hill Booster pump station building to utilize existing Intertie pumps for Boosted zone. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06, and PS-04. Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2019, construction in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 118 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South - Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood Project No:cp1218 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 1,130,000 10,000 - 1,140,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 1,130,000 10,000 - 1,140,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 155,000 - - 155,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 975,000 10,000 - 985,000 - 1,130,000 10,000 - 1,140,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Auburn Way South Corridor Improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design completed in 2015 with construction anticipated to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 119 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Painting Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 150,000 - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,100,000 - 1,100,000 - - 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 Maintenance of reservoirs requires periodic painting to protect the steel and increase the useful life of the reservoir. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID R-05 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 120 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main Replacement Project No:cp1603 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 250,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - DWSRF Loan - 200,000 63,400 1,050,000 263,400 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 200,000 63,400 1,300,000 263,400 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 63,400 - 263,400 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,300,000 - - 200,000 63,400 1,300,000 263,400 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - DWSRF Loan - - - - 1,113,400 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 1,363,400 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 63,400 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,300,000 - - - - 1,363,400 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The facilities evaluation study conducted in 2013-2014 found a suspected leak on the 24" steel transmission main crossing the White River. The approximate location was determined, but further investigation is required to assess the degree and magnitude of the potential leak. This project will provide for full replacement of the river crossing. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-11 Progress Summary: Design is anticipated to be completed in 2017 with construction completed in 2018. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 121 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:cp1416 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 2,504 97,496 250,000 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 2,504 97,496 - 250,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,504 97,496 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 250,000 - 2,504 97,496 - 250,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with F Street SE street improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2016 with construction completed in 2018. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 122 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street SE Storm Improvements Project No:cp1511 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 3,046 457,170 10,000 - 470,216 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - 3,046 457,170 10,000 - 470,216 Capital Expenditures: Design 3,046 45,000 - - 48,046 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 412,170 10,000 - 422,170 3,046 457,170 10,000 - 470,216 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with M St SE storm and street improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2016 and construction will begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 123 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Repair and Replacements Project No:wabd12 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: General reservoir maintenance and minor improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID R-03 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 124 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pipeline Asset Management Study Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 50,000 - - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Pipeline asset management study will identify the remaining useful life of water mains in the system, prioritize pipe replacements, and develop replacement costs to phase in the replacements. 2015 Comprehensive Plan CIP ID D-10 Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 125 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 22nd Street NE & I Street NE Intersection Project No:cp1513 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 40,000 - 285,000 40,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 40,000 - 285,000 40,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 40,000 - - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 285,000 - - 40,000 - 285,000 40,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 285,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 285,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 285,000 - - - - 285,000 Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with 22nd Street NE and I Street NE intersection improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2016 with construction anticipated in 2018. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 126 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Regional Growth Center Access Improvements Project No:wabd14 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 50,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 430,000 - - 480,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 430,000 - - 480,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 430,000 - - 430,000 - 430,000 - - 480,000 Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Urban Center Access Improvements to address water system needs on A Street NW. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2018 with construction completed in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 127 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street NE Widening Project No:wabd13 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 10,000 20,000 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 10,000 20,000 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 20,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 10,000 20,000 10,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 125,000 - - - 155,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 125,000 - - - 155,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 125,000 - - - 125,000 125,000 - - - 155,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with M ST NE widening. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2018 with construction completed in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 128 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South - Hemlock Street SE to Academy Drive SE Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 200,000 50,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 200,000 50,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 50,000 - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 200,000 50,000 1,500,000 1,750,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Auburn Way South street improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 129 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE) Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 75,000 550,000 - 625,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 75,000 550,000 - 625,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 75,000 - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 550,000 - 550,000 - 75,000 550,000 - 625,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Lea Hill Road corridor improvements, Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE), TIP #64. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 130 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Decommission Lea Hill Pump Station Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 83,000 - - 83,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 83,000 - - 83,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 13,000 - - 13,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 70,000 - - 70,000 - 83,000 - - 83,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Lea Hill pump station will be decommissioned after completion of Lea Hill - 132nd Ave Distribution system Modifications. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID PS-10 Progress Summary: Design and Construction will be complete in 2020 Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 131 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Deduct Meter Replacement Program Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,000,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Approximately 200 non-single family irrigation meters within the water system are connected to the customer's supply line on the customer side of the domestic meter, instead of being directly connected to the water main. Since sewer charges for non-single family customers are based on the domestic water meter reading and irrigation water does not use the sewer system, customers ask to have the irrigation use deducted from their overall domestic use for sewer billing purposes. Thus, irrigation meters installed after the domestic meter are referred to as "deduct meters". To improve the billing process, increase staff efficiencies and eliminate manual calculations in the billing process this project will re-install the irrigation meters to directly connect to the main. Deduct meters will be converted to irrigation meters to more equitably bill water usage. Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 132 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Water Plan Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Susan Fenhaus Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 - 200,000 Update the Comprehensive Water Plan as required by Washington Department of Health by May 2022. Progress Summary: Planned Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 133 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill AC Main Replacement Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 200,000 2,500,000 - 2,700,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 200,000 2,500,000 - 2,700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 - 200,000 2,500,000 - 2,700,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Distribution system repair and replacement project required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Project will replace AC water main in the Lea Hill service area. Progress Summary: Planned. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 134 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 110,000 1,100,000 1,210,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 110,000 1,100,000 1,210,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 110,000 - 110,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 - - 110,000 1,100,000 1,210,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Lea Hill Road corridor improvements, Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE), TIP #65. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 135 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE ) Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 130,000 130,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 130,000 130,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 130,000 130,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 130,000 130,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Lea Hill Road corridor improvements, Segment 1 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE), TIP #66. 2015 Comprehensive Water Plan CIP ID D-06 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 136 TABLE W-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets WATER Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 Green River Pump Station Emergency Power - - 600 600 600 600 2,400 Total -$ -$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 600$ 2,400$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 137 SANITARY SEWER Current Facilities The City’s sanitary sewer service area encompasses approximately 28-square miles which are primarily within the City limits, but includes a total of approximately ½ square mile within Auburn’s Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage treatment and disposal. The City’s Sanitary Sewer Utility is responsible for the collection and transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines. The City’s current inventory of approximately 200 miles of sewer lines serves the City’s sewer service area. Table S-1, Facilities Inventory, lists the sewage collection and transmission facilities along with their capacities and locations. Level of Service (LOS) The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan for the Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City’s sewage collection system. These standards represent the average quantities of sewage that the system is designated to accommodate for residential, industrial, and commercial development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Investments in the City’s sewage collection facilities include primarily non-capacity improvements and replacement projects. Anticipated replacements include replacement of aging sewer pipes and manholes in conjunction with arterial and local street improvements, and replacement of pipe identified through the sewer program’s condition assessment process. The City will also undertake significant system assessment efforts including inspections and evaluations of siphons, pump stations, large diameter pipe, and specific areas of the City that shows high levels of inflow and infiltration. The City of Auburn’s sewer system anticipates costs for one capacity project totaling $360,000 and fifteen non-capacity projects totaling $9,729,900. Table S-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 138 TABLE S-1 Facilities Inventory Sewage Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY (MGD)LOCATION Pump Stations: 8th Street 0.26 900 8th Street NE 22nd Street 0.79 1950 22nd Street NE Area 19 0.47 800 71st Street SE Auburn 40 0.63 4159 O Place NE Dogwood 0.43 1423 Dogwood Street SE Ellingson 2.20 100 41st Street SE F Street 0.86 1700 F Street SE North Tapps 0.73 2610 Lake Tapps Pkwy SE Peasley Ridge 0.36 5225 South 320th Street R Street 0.14 600 R Street NE Rainier Ridge 0.29 31809 125th Place SE Riverside 0.58 13900 104th Avenue SE Terrace View 0.94 104 60th Street SE Valley Meadows 0.18 2022 4th Street SE Verdana 2.88 11807 SE 296th Place (Kent, WA) FACILITY Pipe Size LOCATION River Crossings: Inverted Syphon 8 & 12 Inch Green River & 26th Street NE 8th Street Bridge 14 Inch Green River & 8th Street NE City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 139 TABLE S-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING SANITARY SEWER DIVISION 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: 1 B Street NW Reconstruction Project Capital Costs 360,000 - - - - - 360,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 360,000 - - - - - 360,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 360,000 - - - - - 360,000 Non-Capacity Projects: 2 Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement Program Capital Costs - 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 3 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 4 Vactor Decant Facility Capital Costs - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 5 2015 Sewer Repair and Replacement Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 6 Manhole Ring and Cover Replacement Capital Costs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 7 Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement Capital Costs - 141,000 500,000 168,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 141,000 500,000 168,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 8 Siphon Assessment Capital Costs 524,000 - - - - - 524,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 524,000 - - - - - 524,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 9 Pump Station Condition Assessment Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 140 TABLE S-2 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 10 Large Diameter Pipe Assessment Capital Costs - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 11 Inflow and Infiltration Study Capital Costs - - 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - - 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 12 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Capital Costs - - - 350,000 - - 350,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - - - 350,000 - - 350,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 13 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs - 88,000 - - - - 88,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 88,000 - - - - 88,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 14 M Street SE Storm Improvements Capital Costs 27,900 - - - - - 27,900 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 27,900 - - - - - 27,900 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 15 M Street NE Widening Capital Costs - 5,000 45,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 5,000 45,000 - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 16 Pump Station Telemetry Improvements Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,001,900 1,364,000 2,460,000 1,233,000 2,815,000 856,000 9,729,900 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 360,000 - - - - - 360,000 Non-Capacity Projects 1,001,900 1,364,000 2,460,000 1,233,000 2,815,000 856,000 9,729,900 Total Costs 1,361,900 1,364,000 2,460,000 1,233,000 2,815,000 856,000 10,089,900 FUNDING SOURCES: Utility Funds (Sewer)1,361,900 1,364,000 2,460,000 1,233,000 2,815,000 856,000 10,089,900 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - Total Funding 1,361,900 1,364,000 2,460,000 1,233,000 2,815,000 856,000 10,089,900 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 141 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: B Street NW Reconstruction Project Project No:CP1520 Project Type:Capacity: 75%, Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) 25% Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 60,000 360,000 - 420,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 60,000 360,000 - 420,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 60,000 30,000 - 90,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 330,000 - 330,000 - 60,000 360,000 - 420,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 360,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 360,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 330,000 - - - - 360,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: As part of the reconstruction of the street, install approximately 1200 LF of 12" sewer line and associated manholes. Connect a system currently served by a small pump station to the extension and eliminate the station. Progress Summary: Design is underway, with construction anticipated in 2017 Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact on operating budget is anticipated. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 142 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement/System Improvements Program Project No:sebd01 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 2,350,502 1,400,000 - 300,000 3,750,502 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 2,350,502 1,400,000 - 300,000 3,750,502 Capital Expenditures: Design 352,575 150,000 - 200,000 502,575 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,997,927 1,250,000 - 100,000 3,247,927 2,350,502 1,400,000 - 300,000 3,750,502 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 150,000 200,000 150,000 200,000 900,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,350,000 100,000 1,350,000 100,000 3,000,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This should decrease the operating budget by correcting the problems that require operation staff's attention. Repair and replace broken sewer mains and other facilities. These lines will be identified through television inspection and routine cleaning. This particular program includes proposed projects which do not have an approved Project Management Plan, or are not associated with the SOS or other transportation improvements. Anticipated projects include bi-annual, stand-alone, repair and replacement projects for sewer lines which are broken, misaligned, "bellied" or otherwise require an inordinate amount of maintenance effort or present a risk of backup or trench failure, and facilities which generate consistent odor complaints. Additionally, system improvements which enhance the ability to maintain service are included here. Comp Plan ID #1. Progress Summary: Future projects will be identified in 2017. Design of future R&R projects will begin in 2018, with construction of those projects in 2019, and this two-year cycle of design followed by construction will continue in subsequent years. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 143 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:sebd02 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 60,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 120,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 340,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 680,000 400,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 800,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 1,020,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Non Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: No significant Impact Sewer line replacement in coordination with the Local Street Preservation Program and Arterial Preservation Program improvements. Comp Plan ID #2. Progress Summary: Ongoing Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 144 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Vactor Decant Facility Project No:sebd03 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - 150,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 150,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - 150,000 - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 150,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 150,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Non-Capacity (Improvements) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the expenses associated with hauling saturated waste to the County landfill. Currently the City hauls vactored sewage waste to the County landfill on a biweekly basis. The sewage sludge is considerably wet, thus Utility funds are paying for the disposal of water. This project consists of a study/analysis to assess the City’s vactor disposal method and identify a cost-effective alternative to the status quo. Possible recommendations may include maintaining current operations, constructing a gravity decant facility, incorporating special equipment into the vactor truck to increase decanting ability, purchasing specialized dewatering machinery, or collaborating with neighboring utilities for the shared use of facilities and equipment. Comp Plan ID #3 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 145 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2015 Sewer Repair and Replacement Project No:cp1512 Project Type: Project Manager:Kim Truong Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 39,325 1,140,000 10,000 - 1,189,325 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 39,325 1,140,000 10,000 - 1,189,325 Capital Expenditures: Design 39,325 70,000 1,000 - 110,325 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - 1,070,000 9,000 - 1,079,000 39,325 1,140,000 10,000 - 1,189,325 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 1,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - 9,000 - - - - 10,000 This project could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the number of sewer lines that require frequent maintenance staff attention. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) This project consists of the replacement of aging or problematic sewer lines at nine different sites throughout the City. Progress Summary: The project is currently in the preliminary design phase and is scheduled to be constructed in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 146 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Manhole Ring and Cover Replacement Project No:sebd04 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 20,000 80,000 80,000 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 20,000 80,000 80,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 1,000 8,000 8,000 9,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - 19,000 72,000 72,000 91,000 - 20,000 80,000 80,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 48,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 432,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 This project could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the need for staff to respond to loose manholes or lids. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) As manholes and roads age and their condition deteriorates, access covers and the rings in which they sit can become loose and/or misoriented, and can become a road hazard requiring maintenance staff attention and increasing the City's liability. This annual project will replace approximately 50 sewer manhole rings and covers to maintain access to the sewer system and to decrease the likelihood of the manholes becoming road hazards. Some of these replacements may be in conjunction with other City capital projects. Comp Plan ID #7. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 147 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement Project No:sebd05 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - 141,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 141,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 141,000 - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 141,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 500,000 168,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 500,000 168,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 168,000 90,000 141,000 590,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction 450,000 - 810,000 1,260,000 500,000 168,000 900,000 141,000 1,850,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvements) Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Three sewer pump stations, the 8th Street Pump Station, Valley Meadows Pump Station, and 22nd Street Pump Station have been identified as needing renovation, replacement, and/or relocation based on condition, safety concerns, and to accommodate growth. The scope of these improvements has not yet been developed, but will be based on the Pump Station Condition Assessment project scheduled for 2016. Rehabilitation costs for the 3 pump stations have been estimated over a 6-year period. Comp Plan ID #4. Progress Summary: Following the results of the systematic pump station evaluation study scheduled for 2016, the sequence or identification of pump stations requiring R&R, and detailed scope of improvements (one pump station rehabilitated every other year) for each of these stations will be developed. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 148 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Siphon Assessment Project No:sebd06 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 524,000 - 524,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 524,000 - 524,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 524,000 - 524,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 524,000 - 524,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 524,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 524,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 524,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 524,000 This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-Capacity (Improvement) Currently, the City does not have the required equipment to complete inspections of the three sewer siphons (2 across the Green River, 1 under the railroad tracks at H and 6th NW) located within its collection system. Their condition is unknown. This project would inspect each siphon to determine its condition and help set future inspection/cleaning protocols. The siphons would be inspected prior to cleaning to determine what their in situ condition is, then if required the lines would be cleaned and re-inspected. Based on the debris level and condition of the pipes, future activities can be planned. Comp Plan ID #5. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 149 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pump Station Condition Assessment Project No:cp1609 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 177,000 10,000 - 187,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 177,000 10,000 - 187,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 177,000 10,000 - 187,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 177,000 10,000 - 187,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-Capacity (Improvement) The assessment will evaluate the physical condition of existing sewage pump stations and equipment. The purpose of the assessment is to predict future serviceability and anticipated longevity for development of future CIPs and the City's asset management program. This assessment will also be used to further define the scope of the Pump Station Replacement/Improvement project. Comp Plan ID #6. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 150 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Large Diameter Pipe Assessment Project No:sebd07 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - 400,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 400,000 - Capital Expenditures: Planning/Design - - - 400,000 - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 400,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 400,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Planning/Design - - - - 400,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 400,000 This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-Capacity (Improvement) City staff is not equipped to efficiently clean and inspect sewer pipes with a diameter larger than 18 inches. This project would clean and internally inspect all pipe owned by the City that is larger than 18 inches in diameter. This is approximately 39,300 feet, ranging in diameter from 20 inches up to 36 inches. Comp Plan ID #8. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 151 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Inflow and Infiltration Study Project No:cpxxxx Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design/Analysis - - - - - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 Capital Expenditures: Design/Analysis 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 540,000 This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-Capacity (Improvement) This project would assess portions of the City Sewer Service Area for infiltration/inflow (I/I) values, since excessive localized I/I can also be an indicator of poor sewer main and side sewer condition and could contribute to capacity issues in the future. This project would monitor flow in the collection system over 5 years. This data will then be used to help identify repair and replacement needs and for modeling purposes and I/I assessment in future updates to the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Comp Plan ID #9. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 152 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Project No:cpxxxx Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 350,000 - - 350,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 350,000 - - 350,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 350,000 - - 350,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 350,000 - - 350,000 Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvement) This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Prepare an update to the City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan to include an update to the hydraulic model and an update to the Capital Improvement Plan. Comp Plan ID #10. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 153 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:cp1416 Project Type: Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 2,525 21,475 - 88,000 24,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 2,525 21,475 - 88,000 24,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,525 21,475 - 8,800 24,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - 79,200 - 2,525 21,475 - 88,000 24,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 88,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 88,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 8,800 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - 79,200 - - - - 88,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project saves money and avoids damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure of blockage. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Replace approximately 420 LF of 15"-18" diameter clay pipe as part of the F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements project. Constructing this project in association with a road improvement project saves money and avoids damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure or blockage. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 154 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street SE Storm Improvements Project No:cp1511 Project Type: Project Manager:Matt Larson Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 3,283 385,000 27,900 - 416,183 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 3,283 385,000 27,900 - 416,183 Capital Expenditures: Design 3,283 51,717 1,000 - 56,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - 333,283 26,900 - 360,183 3,283 385,000 27,900 - 416,183 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 27,900 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 27,900 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 1,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - 26,900 - - - - 27,900 This project saves money and avoids damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure of blockage. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvement) Replace approximately 800 LF of aging sewer pipe with root intrusion issues with new 8" PVC in conjunction with storm and road improvements. Constructing this project in association with a road improvement project saves money and avoids damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure or blockage. Progress Summary: The road and storm project is currently in a preliminary design phase. Construction is anticipated to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 155 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street NE Widening Project No:sebd08 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - 5,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 5,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 5,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 5,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 45,000 - - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 45,000 - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 5,000 - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 40,000 - - - 40,000 45,000 - - - 50,000 No significant Impact Non-Capacity Sewer line replacements in conjunction with street improvements Progress Summary: Design will be completed in 2018 with construction completed in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 156 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pump Station Telemetry Improvements Project No:sebd09 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 150,000 - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 150,000 - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 25,000 - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 125,000 - 125,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 125,000 - - - - 150,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: The improvements will have a negligible effect on the operating budget. Non-capacity Install new SCADA and communication equipment for the 22nd Street and R Street Pump Station. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 157 STORM DRAINAGE Current Facilities The City’s storm drainage service area encompasses the municipal boundaries of the City. For management purposes the service area is divided into 60 drainage sub-basins. The City’s drainage system consists of a combination of closed conveyance pipes and open ditch conveyance facilities, with six pumping stations. Table SD-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacities and location. Level of Service (LOS) The City’s Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City’s storm drainage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25- year/24-hour design storm capacity within the 60 drainage sub-basins. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s storm drainage facilities anticipate two capacity projects in the amount of $556,200 and seventeen non-capacity projects totaling $15,376.,500 for a six-year planning expectation total of $15,932,700. Table SD-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for storm drainage facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 158 TABLE SD-1 Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION Drainage Basins: A 562 54,135 1,643 See City of Auburn's AA 408 33,726 18,063 Comprehensive Drainage AAA 296 1,843 8,697 Plan, Dec. 2015 AZ 777 76,451 28,779 B 864 116,476 2,735 BB 15 1,658 0 BBB 73 0 0 C 836 92,545 5,366 CC 242 1,456 0 CCC 981 71,127 27,523 D 168 21,057 177 DD 231 1,819 0 DDD 61 3,981 0 E 692 71,787 23,674 EE 600 4,294 0 F 83 10,124 0 FF 411 3,589 896 G 137 20,036 0 GG 190 4,745 3,138 H 559 58,645 5,468 HH 392 0 0 HV 66 12,172 0 I 241 39,379 7,152 II 305 0 0 J 257 20,967 2,101 JJ 1,170 32,742 17,192 K 266 25,800 2,574 KK 391 0 0 L 87 19,642 4,164 LL 198 35 1,567 LS 1,139 100,817 0 M 553 45,070 12,186 MM 332 1,779 1,204 N 126 9,815 0 NN 588 42,857 913 NNN 175 5,028 1,165 O 176 25,674 3,639 OO 1,397 37,359 27,978 P 189 28,363 5,312 PP 110 1,321 0 PPP 161 2,869 5,637 QQ 334 13,415 4,845 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 159 TABLE SD-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION R 55 7,166 0 RR 249 11,679 4,944 S 273 13,730 2,236 SS 333 20,279 6,065 T 698 131,734 4,089 TT 135 12,041 131 U 365 26,439 557 UU 453 14,680 3,711 V 598 35,715 10,059 W 287 33,935 3,153 WC 65 7,895 0 WW 71 968 548 X 40 3,616 0 YY 327 19,088 7,284 YYY 105 15 0 Z 70 9,678 0 ZZ 945 54,048 39,862 ZZZ 237 0 0 Total 22,145 1,517,304 306,427 FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Pump Stations: White River Pump Station 17,700 5000 block A Street SE A Street SE Pump Station 1,380 A Street SE near SR-18 and BNRR overpass Auburn Way S Pump Station #3 1,000 Auburn Way S near SR-18 and BNRR overpass Brannan Park Pump Station #4 20,200 Brannan Park Emerald Corp. Park Pump Station 6,500 C Street NE near 42nd Street West Main Street Pump Station 1,200 1420 West Main Street CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 160 TABLE SD-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING STORM DRAINAGE DIVISION 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: 1 M Street SE Storm Improvement Capital Costs 265,200 - - - - - 265,200 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 265,200 - - - - - 265,200 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 2 37th St. NW Storm Improvement Capital Costs 40,000 251,000 - - - - 291,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 40,000 251,000 - - - - 291,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 305,200 251,000 - - - - 556,200 Non-Capacity Projects: 3 Pipeline Repair & Replacement Program Capital Costs 1,000,000 100,000 844,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 3,144,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 1,000,000 100,000 844,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 3,144,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 4 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 3 Capital Costs - - - 200,000 1,924,000 - 2,124,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - 200,000 1,924,000 - 2,124,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 5 West Main Street Pump Station Upgrade Capital Costs - - - - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 6 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 7 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update Capital Costs - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 161 TABLE SD-2 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 8 Eastridge Manor Outfall Replacement Capital Costs 315,000 700,000 - - - - 1,015,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 315,000 700,000 - - - - 1,015,000 Grants - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 9 Vegetation Sorting Facility Capital Costs 750,000 75,000 - - - - 825,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 750,000 75,000 - - - - 825,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 10 Hillside Drainage Assessment Capital Costs 139,000 150,000 - - - - 289,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 139,000 150,000 - - - - 289,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 11 North Airport Area Improvements Capital Costs - - 50,000 168,000 - - 218,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 50,000 168,000 - - 218,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 12 D St. SE Storm Improvement Capital Costs - - 250,000 1,393,000 - - 1,643,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 250,000 1,393,000 - - 1,643,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 13 S. 330th St. & 46th Pl. S. Storm Improvement Capital Costs - 20,000 53,000 244,000 - - 317,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 20,000 53,000 244,000 - - 317,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 14 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 15 Academy Drive, SE 312th St. SE, & D St. SE Storm Improvements Capital Costs - 40,000 400,000 - - - 440,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 40,000 400,000 - - - 440,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 162 TABLE SD-2 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 16 23rd Street SE Storm Improvement Capital Costs - - 73,000 243,500 - - 316,500 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 73,000 243,500 - - 316,500 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 17 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs - 50,000 405,000 - - - 455,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 50,000 405,000 - - - 455,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 18 S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 1 Capital Costs - - 20,000 62,000 326,000 - 408,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 20,000 62,000 326,000 - 408,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 19 S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 2 Capital Costs - - - 20,000 70,000 214,000 304,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - 20,000 70,000 214,000 304,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 2,314,000 1,235,000 2,195,000 2,830,500 3,720,000 3,082,000 15,376,500 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 305,200 251,000 - - - - 556,200 Non-Capacity Projects 2,314,000 1,235,000 2,195,000 2,830,500 3,720,000 3,082,000 15,376,500 Total Costs 2,619,200 1,486,000 2,195,000 2,830,500 3,720,000 3,082,000 15,932,700 FUNDING SOURCES: Storm Fund 2,619,200 1,486,000 2,195,000 2,830,500 3,720,000 3,082,000 15,932,700 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Total Funding 2,619,200 1,486,000 2,195,000 2,830,500 3,720,000 3,082,000 15,932,700 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 163 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:M Street SE Storm Improvement Project No:cp1511 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 38,312 361,140 265,200 - 664,652 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 38,312 361,140 265,200 - 664,652 Capital Expenditures: Design 38,312 51,688 - - 90,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 309,452 265,200 - 574,652 38,312 361,140 265,200 - 664,652 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 265,200 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 265,200 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 265,200 - - - - 265,200 This project will install a replacement pipe of greater capacity from 3rd Street SE to Main Street to alleviate periodic flooding in this area as a result of upstream flows conveyed in replaced lines upstream associated with earlier projects. Progress Summary: In design. Construction will begin in 2016. No additional budget is required. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None, since this is a replacement pipe. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 164 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:37th St. NW Storm Improvement Project No:sdbd05 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 40,000 251,000 40,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 40,000 251,000 40,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 40,000 20,000 40,000 Right of Way - - - Construction - - 231,000 - - - 40,000 251,000 40,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 291,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 291,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 231,000 - - - - 291,000 This projectwill increase existing pipes to provide additional capacity to alleviate current periodic flooding conditions in vicinity of "I" St. NW. This will also provide relief to the flooding experienced on the Interurban Bike Trail. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 2 Progress Summary: Temporary work to evaluate the capacity for addressing the re-occurring flooding has been completed and will be observed for the next year. A project scope will be developed from this information. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 165 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pipeline Repair & Replacement Program Project No:sdbd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 459,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,559,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 459,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,559,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 75,000 100,000 75,000 Right of Way - - Construction 459,000 100,000 925,000 1,484,000 459,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 1,559,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 844,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 3,144,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 844,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 3,144,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 100,000 75,000 100,000 525,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 769,000 - 925,000 - 2,619,000 844,000 100,000 1,000,000 100,000 3,144,000 This program provides funding for projects involving replacement of existing infrastructure. These projects support street repairs and other utility replacement programs, requiring coordination. Typically, design for R&R projects is completed in one year, followed by construction the following year. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 1 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Repair and replacement of aging infrastructure should reduce operating costs. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 166 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 3 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 200,000 1,924,000 - 2,124,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 200,000 1,924,000 - 2,124,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 200,000 290,000 - 490,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,634,000 - 1,634,000 - 200,000 1,924,000 - 2,124,000 This project would reduce flooding in C St. NE by redirecting wet weather high flows southward to the 42-inch diameter (Phase 1) storm drain in 30th St. NE. By redirecting the C St. NE drainage into the Brannan Park system, these flows would no longer be affected by high water levels in Mill Creek. To avoid deepening the Phase 1 gravity line (and extensive retrofits to the Brannan Park pump station), this project would include a wet weather pump station and force main connection to 30th St. NE. The upgraded 42-inch diameter pipe in 30th St. NE would have sufficient capacity for these additional flows. Key components of Phase 3 include: Wet weather pump station (estimated capacity of 4.5 to 7 cfs), 1,730 feet of 15-inch diameter force main; Diversion structure in C St. NE for pump station 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 4B Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 167 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: West Main Street Pump Station Upgrade Project No:sdbd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 300,000 385,000 685,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,283,000 2,283,000 - - 300,000 2,668,000 2,968,000 No significant impact. This project will update the existing pump station by providing a redundant pump and telemetry system meeting level of service goals, install new force main and outlet. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 1 Progress Summary: Ditch cleaning efforts by the WSDOT will be observed over the next two years. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 168 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:sdbd04 Project Type:Non Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: Previous 2 years 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 70,000 88,000 100,000 100,000 358,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 70,000 88,000 100,000 100,000 358,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 5,000 - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 70,000 83,000 100,000 100,000 253,000 70,000 88,000 100,000 100,000 258,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Storm drainage conveyance improvements in coordination with Arterial Preservation and Local Street Preservation improvements. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 12 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 169 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Tim Carlaw Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 300,000 - - 300,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 300,000 - - 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 300,000 - - 300,000 None Update the Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan to be consistent with the City's overall Comprehensive Plan update as required by the State of Washington. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 9 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 170 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Eastridge Manor Outfall Replacement Project No:cp1316 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 33,464 11,025 315,000 700,000 359,489 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 33,464 11,025 315,000 700,000 359,489 Capital Expenditures: Design 33,464 11,025 130,000 40,000 174,489 Right of Way - 185,000 - 185,000 Construction - 660,000 - 33,464 11,025 315,000 700,000 359,489 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 1,015,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 1,015,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 170,000 Right of Way - - - - 185,000 Construction - - - - 660,000 - - - - 1,015,000 Replace the existing deteriorated outfall with new High Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Two existing outfalls may be combined into a single outfall. Improvements to the Golf Course conveyance system may be needed. Progress Summary: Alternatives evaluation completed and preferred alternative selected for design. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 171 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Vegetation Sorting Facility Project No:sdbd12 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 750,000 75,000 750,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 750,000 75,000 750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - 750,000 - 750,000 Construction - - - 75,000 - - - 750,000 75,000 750,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 825,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 825,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - 750,000 Construction - - - - 75,000 - - - - 825,000 Evaluation to determine benefits and costs of acquiring property to use as a vegetation sorting facility prior to disposal or reuse of materials from storm drainage maintenance activities (e.g., pond and ditch cleaning). In addition, evaluate potential for use by other City departments and by neighboring jurisdictions as a regional facility. If evaluation shows a reasonable benefit/cost ratio, budget includes property acquisition and site improvements to construct the vegetation sorting facility. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 10 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Impacts to the operating budget are included in subsequent years after acquisition of the property. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 172 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Hillside Drainage Assessment Project No:sdbd07 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 139,000 150,000 139,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 139,000 150,000 139,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 139,000 150,000 139,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 139,000 150,000 139,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 289,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 289,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 289,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 289,000 The existing drainage system includes pipes that discharge over hillsides. While a preliminary inventory and mapping of locations has been completed, field-locating and detailed inspection is warranted to define deficiencies. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 3 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 173 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:North Airport Area Improvements Project No:sdbd10 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 50,000 168,000 - - 218,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 168,000 - - 218,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 168,000 - - 168,000 50,000 168,000 - - 218,000 This project would provide additional storage depth in Pond I and replace the existing inlet pipe at a lower invert to the pond, and install a backflow preventer at the outlet. The project also includes the installation of a second backflow preventer at the overflow to 30th St. NE to protect the hangar area. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 6 Progress Summary: None Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 174 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:D St. SE Storm Improvement Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 250,000 1,393,000 - - 1,643,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 1,393,000 - - 1,643,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 250,000 129,000 - - 379,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,264,000 - - 1,264,000 250,000 1,393,000 - - 1,643,000 This project would replace the existing line along D St. SE from 21st St. SE to 27th St. SE. The project will eliminate an existing injection well near 25th & D St. SE. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 7 Progress Summary: None Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 175 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 330th St. & 46th Pl. S. Storm Improvement Project No:sdbd13 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - 20,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 20,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 20,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 20,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 53,000 244,000 - 317,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 53,000 244,000 - - 317,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 53,000 - - - 73,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 244,000 - - 244,000 53,000 244,000 - - 317,000 Improve existing drainage conditions for the West Hill annexation areas. This project includes improvements near 330th St. and 46th Pl. S. where public storm drainage currently discharges within a large open ditch. The improvement will re-route the drainage within the right-of-way to the existing outfall. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 5A Progress Summary: None Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 176 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 1B Project No:cp1522 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kim Truong Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 1,294,251 10,000 - 1,304,251 Grants- Secured (Local)- 300,000 - - 300,000 Bond Proceeds 4,932 594,651 - - 599,583 Other - - - - - 4,932 2,188,902 10,000 - 2,203,834 Capital Expenditures: Design 4,932 200,000 - - 204,932 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,988,902 10,000 - 1,998,902 4,932 2,188,902 10,000 - 2,203,834 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants- Secured (Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 This project will complete the Phase 1 project by completing the downstream system not completed in Phase 1A. Phase 1A replaced the existing 30-inch diameter pipe generally located along the 30th St. NE alignment toward I St. NE to improve drainage conditions in and around the north end of the Auburn Municipal Airport. Phase 1B will complete the remainder of the project by constructing the downstream system to the existing Brannan Park pump station. Progress Summary: Preliminary design is completed and final design will be completed in 2016 and construction is anticipated to begin in 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 177 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Academy Drive, SE 312th St. SE, & D St. SE Storm Improvements Project No:cp1312 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 47,382 1,588 - 40,000 48,970 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 47,382 1,588 - 40,000 48,970 Capital Expenditures: Design 47,382 1,588 - 40,000 48,970 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 47,382 1,588 - 40,000 48,970 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 400,000 - - - 440,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 400,000 - - - 440,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 20,000 - - - 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 380,000 - - - 380,000 400,000 - - - 440,000 Project replaces existing storm system infrastructure. Funding is from the 2015-2016 Pipeline Repair and Replacement Program. Project includes pipeline replacement in Academy Drive, a new pipeline within 312th St. SE to provide a "missing link", and the extension of a pipeline to the Velvet Square storm pond to allow the pond to be abandoned. Progress Summary: Project design will be completed in 2018 with construction in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 178 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:23rd Street SE Storm Improvement Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 73,000 243,500 - - 316,500 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 73,000 243,500 - - 316,500 Capital Expenditures: Design 73,000 - - - 73,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 243,500 - - 243,500 73,000 243,500 - - 316,500 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will improve existing drainage conditions in vicinity of 23rd St. SE & K St. SE. The project includes installation of a new 12-inch line along K St. SE from 23rd St. SE to 21st St. SE to alleviate flooding associated with the pedestrian entrance to Terminal Park Elementary School. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 8 (Phase 1) Progress Summary: None Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 179 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:sdbd14 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - 50,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 405,000 - - - 455,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 405,000 - - - 455,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 55,000 - - - 105,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 350,000 - - - 350,000 405,000 - - - 455,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: As part of a non-motorized improvement project along Riverwalk Drive SE between Howard Road and Auburn Way South, construct large diameter storm piping to replace existing ditch, and expand Riverwalk ponds to accommodate increased capacity. Progress Summary: None Future Impact on Operating Budget: Maintenance should decrease as a result of the project. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 180 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 1 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 20,000 62,000 326,000 - 408,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 20,000 62,000 326,000 - 408,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 20,000 62,000 - - 82,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 326,000 - 326,000 20,000 62,000 326,000 - 408,000 Improve existing drainage conditions for the West Hill annexation areas. The project includes improvements near S 314th St. and 54th Ave S to redirect flows and implement LID techniques. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 5B Phase 1 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 181 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 2 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 20,000 70,000 214,000 304,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 20,000 70,000 214,000 304,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 20,000 50,000 - 70,000 Right of Way - - 20,000 - 20,000 Construction - - - 214,000 214,000 - 20,000 70,000 214,000 304,000 Improve existing drainage conditions for the West Hill annexation areas. The project includes improvements near S 314th St. and 54th Ave S to route the remaining public storm drainage through a new easement and pipe to the downstream system. 2015 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Project No. 5B Phase 2 Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 182 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 183 PARKS, ARTS AND RECREATION Current Facilities The City of Auburn’s park system consists of a total of 940.13 acres of neighborhood and community parks, special use areas, open space and linear parks (trails). Table PR – 1 “Facilities Inventory” lists all park and recreation land in the City’s park system along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS provided by the City’s park system represents the existing inventory of City- owned park acres divided by the 2016 City population of 77,060. This equates to 0.76 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 2.90 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.22 acres for linear parks, 5.02 acres for open space, and 3.30 acres for special use areas. The proposed LOS provided by the City’s park system represents the planned 2022 inventory of City-owned park acres divided by the 2022 projected City population of 84,760. This equates to 0.80 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.16 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.24 acres per 1,000 population for linear parks, 4.56 acres per 1,000 population for open space, and 3.00 acres per 1,000 population for special use areas. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Parks and Recreation facilities include twenty-seven capital projects at a cost of $19,215,106. Table PR – 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table PR – 3 shows, operating budget impacts of $138,000 are forecasted for parks and recreation facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 184 TABLE PR-1 Facilities Inventory Parks, Arts and Recreation, Land CAPACITY FACILITY (Acres)LOCATION Neighborhood Parks: Existing Inventory: 21st Street Playground 0.17 405 21st St. SE Auburndale Park 9.74 31802 108th Ave. SE Ballard Park 0.68 1612 37th Way SE Cameron Park 3.85 3727 Lemon Tree Lane Cedar Lane Park 8.36 1002 25th St. SE Dorthy Bothell Park 4.35 1087 Evergreen Way SE Dykstra Park 1.67 1487 22nd St. NE Forest Villa mini-park 0.21 1647 Fir St. SE Gaines Park 1.33 1008 Pike St. NW Indian Tom Park 0.42 1316 6th St. NE Jornada Park 1.89 1433 U Ct. NW Kersey 3 Park A 2.73 5480 Charlotte Ave. SE Kersey 3 Park B 0.79 5530 Udall Ave. SE Lakeland Hills Park 5.06 1401 Evergreen Way SE Lea Hill Courts 1.18 32121 105th Pl. SE Riverpoint Park 2.95 1450 32nd St. NE Riversands Park 1.76 5014 Pike St NE Rotary Park 3.89 2635 Alpine St. NE Scootie Brown Park 1.68 1403 Henry Rd. NE Shaughnessy Park 3.46 3302 21st St. SE Terminal Park 1.22 1292 C St. SE Village Square 1.10 12111 SE 310th St. Total Neighborhood Parks 58.49 Proposed Capacity Projects: Auburndale II Park 9.35 29700 118th Street SE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 9.35 2022 Projected Inventory Total - Neighborhood Parks -67.84 Community Parks: Existing Inventory: Brannan Park 21.68 1019 28th St. NE Fulmer Field 5.04 1101 5th St. NE Game Farm Park 57.20 3030 R St. SE Game Farm Wilderness Park 48.50 2407 Stuck River Dr. SE GSA Park 5.31 413 15th St. SW Isaac Evans Park 19.87 29627 Green River Road NE Lea Hill Park 5.26 31693 124th Ave. SE Les Gove Park 14.68 910 9th St. SE Mill Pond 4.20 4582 Mill Pond Dr, SE Roegner Park 19.22 601 Oravetz Road Sunset Park 15.15 1420 69th St SE Veteran's Memorial Park 7.67 405 E St. NE Total Community Parks 223.78 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 185 TABLE PR-1 (continued) Proposed Capacity Projects: 104th Avenue SE 14.73 31495 104th Ave. SE Jacobson Tree Farm 29.30 29387 132nd Ave SE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 44.03 2022 Projected Inventory Total - Community Parks -267.81 Linear Parks: Existing Inventory: Interurban Trail 9.14 804 West Main St. Lake Tapps Parkway Trail 2.36 1420 69th St SE Lakeland Hills Trail 1.66 1087 Evergreen Way SE Reddington Levee Trail 2.50 1019 28th St NE White River Trail 0.93 601 Oravetz St. NE Total Linear Parks 16.59 Proposed Capacity Projects: Green River Trail 0.83 277th to Reddington Levee Trail Jacobsen Tree Farm to Green River Trail 2.75 White River Trail Extension 0.05 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 3.63 2022 Projected Inventory Total - Linear Parks -20.22 Special Use Areas: Existing Inventory: Auburn Environmental Park 16.84 413 Western Ave NW B Street Plaza 0.10 148 East Main St. Bicentennial Park 1.07 502 Auburn Way S. Centennial Viewpoint Park 0.70 402 Mountain View Dr. City Hall Plaza 1.10 25 West Main St. Clark Plaza 0.25 1420 Auburn Way N. Community Garden A 1.04 1030 8th St. NE Fenster/Green River Access 12.58 10502 Auburn Black Diamond Road Fly-in Lion Park 0.02 101 15th St. NE Golf Course 139.71 29630 Green River Road SE Mountain View Cemetery 60.00 2020 Mountain View Dr. Olson Canyon Farmstead 20.00 28728 Green River Road Pioneer Cemetery 0.76 802 Auburn Way N, Plaza Park 0.19 2 West Main St. Slaughter Memorial 0.02 2988 Auburn Way N. Total Special Use Areas 254.38 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2022 Projected Inventory Total - Special Use Areas -254.38 Open Space Areas: Existing Inventory: Auburn Environmental Park Open Space 190.91 413 Western Ave. NW Clark Property 26.68 TBD Game Farm Open Space 26.00 3030 R St. SE Golf Course Open Space 40.98 29630 Green River Road SE Lakeland Hills Nature Area 46.07 500 182nd Ave. S Olson Canyon Open Space 47.00 28728 Green River Road West Auburn Lake 9.25 32054 58th Ave. S Total Open Space Areas 386.89 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2022 Projected Inventory Total - Open Space Areas -386.89 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 186 TABLE PR-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING PARKS, ARTS and RECREATION (Municipal Parks Construction Fund) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: 1 Park Acquisitions/Development Capital Costs 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - KC Prop 2 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 2 Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Capital Costs - - 12,000,000 - - - 12,000,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 Other (Developer)- - 4,000,000 - - - 4,000,000 Bond Proceeds - - 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 3 Brannan Park Synthetic Infield Capital Costs 436,200 - 60,000 - - - 496,200 Funding Sources: KC Prop 2 48,100 - - - - - 48,100 Grants (Fed,State,Local)293,100 - - - - - 293,100 Other 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Park Impact Fees 75,000 - 60,000 - - - 135,000 4 Mary Olson Farm - Watts Property Acquisition Capital Costs 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)125,000 - - - - - 125,000 REET 1 125,000 - - - - - 125,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 811,200 125,000 12,185,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 13,496,200 Non-Capacity Projects: 5 Les Gove Park Improvements Capital Costs 481,906 100,000 - - - - 581,906 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)431,906 - - - - - 431,906 KC Prop 2 - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 6 Rotary Park Improvements Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 - - - - 60,000 Funding Sources: KC Prop 2 30,000 30,000 - - - - 60,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 187 TABLE PR-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 7 Miscellaneous Parks Improvements Capital Costs 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 8 Cameron Park Capital Costs - - 55,000 - - - 55,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 55,000 - - - 55,000 Other - - - - - - - 9 Game Farm Park Improvements Capital Costs 40,000 - 1,500,000 - - - 1,540,000 Funding Sources: REET 2 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 Other (Park Impact Fee)20,000 - - - - - 20,000 10 Gaines Park Capital Costs - - 35,000 - - - 35,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 - - 35,000 - - - 35,000 11 Roegner Park Capital Costs 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)50,000 - - - - - 50,000 KC Prop 2 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 12 Auburndale Park Capital Costs - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- - 100,000 - - - 100,000 13 Auburndale Park II Capital Costs - - 575,000 - - - 575,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Other - - 575,000 - - - 575,000 14 Sunset Park Capital Costs 400,000 - - - - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Other (Contributions)200,000 - - - - - 200,000 15 BPA Trail on Lea Hill Capital Costs - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 150,000 - - 150,000 KC Prop 2 - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 188 TABLE PR-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 16 Lakeland Hills Nature Area Capital Costs 25,000 150,000 - - - - 175,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - REET 2 25,000 150,000 - - - - 175,000 17 Les Gove Restroom Facility Capital Costs 400,000 - - - - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Other (Park Impact Fee)150,000 - - - - - 150,000 18 Fulmer Park Playground Replacement Capital Costs - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Other - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 19 Lakeland Hills Playground Replacement Capital Costs - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - 75,000 - - - - 75,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- 75,000 - - - - 75,000 20 Game Farm Drainage Improvements Capital Costs - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 21 Lea Hill Mini Soccer Field Turf Replacement Capital Costs - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Other - - - - - - - 22 First Green & Surrounds Rebuild Capital Costs 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 25,000 - - - - - 25,000 23 10th Green & Surrounds Rebuild Capital Costs - 27,000 - - - - 27,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 - 27,000 - - - - 27,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 189 TABLE PR-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 24 Fairway Drainage Improvement Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 - - - - 60,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 - - - - 60,000 25 Chemical Storage Container Capital Costs 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - REET 2 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 26 Topdressing Sand Storage Cover Structure Capital Costs 45,000 - - - - - 45,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - REET 2 45,000 - - - - - 45,000 27 Les Gove Campus Security Cameras Capital Costs 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,766,906 737,000 2,615,000 300,000 150,000 150,000 5,718,906 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 811,200 125,000 12,185,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 13,496,200 Non-Capacity Projects 1,766,906 737,000 2,615,000 300,000 150,000 150,000 5,718,906 Total Costs 2,578,106 862,000 14,800,000 425,000 275,000 275,000 19,215,106 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 95,000 125,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 420,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)1,200,006 50,000 3,705,000 200,000 50,000 50,000 5,255,006 Bond Proceeds - - 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 KC Prop 2 228,100 255,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 983,100 Other -Parks Impact 545,000 125,000 210,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1,030,000 REET 1 125,000 - - - - - 125,000 REET 2 165,000 307,000 35,000 - - - 507,000 Other 220,000 - 4,675,000 - - - 4,895,000 Total Funding 2,578,106 862,000 14,800,000 425,000 275,000 275,000 19,215,106 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 190 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Park Acquisitions/Development Project No:gpbd04 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - General Fund Transfer In - - - - - KC Prop 2 18,200 46,414 125,000 125,000 189,614 18,200 46,414 125,000 125,000 189,614 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - 46,414 125,000 125,000 171,414 Construction 18,200 - - - 18,200 18,200 46,414 125,000 125,000 189,614 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - General Fund Transfer In - - - - - KC Prop 2 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 Construction - - - - - 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 750,000 None Land acquisitions to occur based on demand and deficiencies including parks, open space, trails and corridors. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 191 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Jacobsen Tree Farm Site Plan Project No:cp0609 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 25,321 - - - 25,321 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (Development)- - - - - 25,321 - - - 25,321 Capital Expenditures: Design 25,321 - - - 25,321 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 25,321 - - - 25,321 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 Bond Proceeds 6,000,000 - - - 6,000,000 REET - - - - - Other (Development)4,000,000 - - - 4,000,000 12,000,000 - - - 12,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 500,000 - - - 500,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 11,500,000 - - - 11,500,000 12,000,000 - - - 12,000,000 Develop the 31 acre site into a regional sports facility. A Master Plan for the park was completed in 2009 and will serve as a roadmap for development of the site. The newly annexed Lea Hill area of the City is deficient in park acreage. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact due to master plan. Future park development will result in maintenance and utility expenses undeterminable at this time. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 192 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Brannan Park Synthetic Infield Project No:gpbd12 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total KC Prop 2 - - 48,100 - 48,100 Grants- Unsecured (KCYSFG)- - 75,000 - 75,000 Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)- - 218,100 - 218,100 Other- Donations - - 20,000 - 20,000 Park Impact fees - - 75,000 - 75,000 - - 436,200 - 436,200 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 18,500 - 18,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 417,700 - 417,700 - - 436,200 - 436,200 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: KC Prop 2 - - - - 48,100 Grants- Unsecured (KCYSFG)- - - - 75,000 Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)- - - - 218,100 Other- Donations - - - - 20,000 Park Impact fees 60,000 - - - 135,000 60,000 - - - 496,200 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 18,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 60,000 - - - 477,700 60,000 - - - 496,200 Upgrade the existing dirt infield to synthetic turf to increase playability during inclement weather. The Parks Department submitted an application for a Youth Sports Facilities Grant (YAF) from RCO in May 2016 for the synthetic infield. In addition, a King County Youth Athletic Facilities Grant application was submitted to cover City matching funds for the YAF grant. Additional improvements to the park include replacing the degraded concrete curbing around the perimeter of the parking lot. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 193 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Mary Olson Farm - Watts Property Acquisition Project No:gpbd13 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber/Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Grants- Unsecured (KCCF)- - 125,000 - 125,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 1 - - 125,000 - 125,000 Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - 250,000 - 250,000 Construction - - - - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 125,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 125,000 Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - - - - - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - - - 250,000 Construction - - - - - - - - - 250,000 Acquire approximately 16 acres in the southern portion of tax parcel number 3222059118, which is located east of the Mary Olson Farm property. The purpose of the acquisition is to create interpretive and educational opportunities in a plateau area that has historical significance within the steep forested ravine. The area was once a gathering place for Native Americans preparing to embark on fishing expeditions. The City was recently awarded a King County Conservation Futures grant to acquire the property. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 194 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Les Gove Park Improvements Project No:cp1605 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (KCCF)- 115,000 431,906 - 546,906 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other-Park Impact Fee - - 50,000 - 50,000 KC Prop 2 - 260,000 - 100,000 260,000 375,000 481,906 100,000 856,906 Capital Expenditures: Design - 15,000 - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 360,000 481,906 100,000 841,906 - 375,000 481,906 100,000 856,906 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (KCCF)- - - - 431,906 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other-Park Impact Fee - - - - 50,000 KC Prop 2 - - - - 100,000 - - - - 581,906 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 581,906 - - - - 581,906 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: $5,000 Utilities Based on the completed Les Gove Master Plan, design and implement recommendations that will increase user safety, encourage public use and community connectivity. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 195 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Rotary Park Improvements Project No:gpbd07 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total KC Prop 2 - - 30,000 30,000 60,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 30,000 30,000 60,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: KC Prop 2 - - - - 60,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 60,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 50,000 - - - - 60,000 None Coordinate improvements with neighborhood and Rotary Club of Auburn to add walking path. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 196 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Miscellaneous Parks Improvements Project No:gpbd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Grants- Unsecured State - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)10,922 - 50,000 50,000 60,922 10,922 - 150,000 150,000 160,922 Capital Expenditures: Professional Services - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 10,922 - 150,000 150,000 160,922 10,922 - 150,000 150,000 160,922 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants- Unsecured State 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)*50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 Capital Expenditures: Professional Services - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 None Minor park improvements including shelters, roofs, playgrounds, irrigation and restrooms. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 197 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Cameron Park Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)55,000 - - - 55,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - 55,000 - - - 55,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 5,000 - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 50,000 - - - 50,000 55,000 - - - 55,000 None This project will improve the pedestrian trail and add landscape and fencing to serve as buffer to the neighborhood and play structure. This project is identified in the Parks Improvement Plan. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 198 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Game Farm Park Improvements Project No:gpbd08 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 20,000 - 20,000 Other (Park Impact Fee)- - 20,000 - 20,000 - 40,000 - 40,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 40,000 40,000 - - 40,000 - 40,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 20,000 Other (Park Impact Fee)- - - - 20,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,540,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 40,000 - - - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,460,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - 1,540,000 None Improve interior lighting and pathways and provide access from the newly acquired property on southwest corner of the park. Replace synthetic turf on two full sized soccer fields. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 199 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Gaines Park Project No:gpbd09 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 35,000 - - - 35,000 Other - - - - - 35,000 - - - 35,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,000 - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 25,000 - - - 25,000 35,000 - - - 35,000 None Develop Horticulture Plan for the Park as indicated in the Parks Improvement Plan and repair boardwalk. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 200 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Roegner Park Project No:gpbd10 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - 25,000 - 25,000 Grants- Unsecured (Private )- - 50,000 - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (Prop Levy 2)- - 25,000 - 25,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 95,000 - 95,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - 25,000 Grants- Unsecured (Private )- - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (Prop Levy 2)- - - - 25,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 95,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: This project will provide for trail system maintenance, play structure replacement and riverbank stabilization. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 201 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburndale Park Project No:gpbd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - 25,000 - - 25,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- - - - - Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - - 25,000 - 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 25,000 - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 25,000 - 25,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)100,000 - - - 100,000 Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 5,000 - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 95,000 - - - 95,000 100,000 - - - 100,000 Utilities would increase by $5,000 Develop a Master Plan for the Park, install an irrigation system, new play structure and improve signage. Create an entrance to the park from the east via 110th Ave SE to allow access from the adjacent neighborhoods. Construct new section of trail in the western portion of the park. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Progress Summary: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 202 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburndale Park II Project No:gpbd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other TBD - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other TBD 575,000 - - - 575,000 575,000 - - - 575,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 - - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 500,000 - - - 500,000 575,000 - - - 575,000 Description: Develop a Master Plan, improve the existing trail system and install signage and play structure. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Increased utility costs of $2,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 203 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Sunset Park Project No:gpbd06 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - 200,000 - 200,000 Other -Contributions & Donations - - 200,000 - 200,000 - - 400,000 - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 15,000 - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 385,000 - 385,000 - - 400,000 - 400,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - 200,000 Other -Contributions & Donations - - - - 200,000 - - - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 385,000 - - - - 400,000 Description: Expand playground area to include spray park and additional play activities. Coordinate improvements with service club and Lakeland Hills Homeowners Association. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Increase in Utilities of $10,000 per year Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 204 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: BPA Trail on Lea Hill Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (KC Prop. 2)*- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Predesign - - - - - Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)- 150,000 - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (KC Prop. 2)*- - - - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Predesign - 25,000 - - 25,000 Design - 125,000 - - 125,000 Construction - - - - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 None Develop a feasibility study related to constructability of a pedestrian trail linking the Jacobsen Tree Farm site to the west end of Lea Hill. This trail would follow the alignment of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) transmission lines from 132nd to 108th Avenue SE. Construction would be in phases based on constructability. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 205 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lakeland Hills Nature Area Project No:gpbd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 2 - - 25,000 150,000 25,000 Other - - - - - - - 25,000 150,000 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 25,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 150,000 - - - 25,000 150,000 25,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 2 - - - - 175,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 175,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 150,000 - - - - 175,000 Increased maintenance costs of $5,000 Complete Master Plan to include the development and construction of an environmental community park. Trails, fencing, parking and visitor amenities are included in the project. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 206 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Les Gove Restroom Facility Project No:gpbd14 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (CDBG)- - 250,000 - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - 150,000 - 150,000 - - 400,000 - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 350,000 - 350,000 - - 400,000 - 400,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (CDBG)- - - - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - 150,000 - - - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 350,000 - - - - 400,000 Construct new restroom to replace the dated facility at Les Gove Park. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 207 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Fulmer Park Playground Replacement Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other Park Impact - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)50,000 - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other Park Impact 100,000 - - - 100,000 150,000 - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 7,500 - - - 7,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 142,500 - - - 142,500 150,000 - - - 150,000 Replace aging playground. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 208 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lakeland Hills Playground Replacement Project No:gpbd15 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - 75,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Parks Impact Fees - - - 75,000 - Other - - - - - - - - 150,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 10,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 140,000 - - - - 150,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - 75,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Parks Impact Fees - - - - 75,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 140,000 - - - - 150,000 Replace aging playground at Lakeland Hills. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 209 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Game Farm Drainage Improvements Project No:gpbd16 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - - 100,000 - Other - - - - - - - - 100,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 20,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 80,000 - - - - 100,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - - - 100,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 20,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 80,000 - - - - 100,000 Improve drainage at the entrance and in the parking lot at Game Farm Park. For years the entrance to the park and parking lots have flooded during heavy rain events. Alternatives need to be explored to divert stormwater in the necessary direction to avoid flooding these areas and affecting access to the park and sports complex. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 210 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Mini Soccer Field Turf Replacement Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)50,000 - - - 50,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,500 - - - 2,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 47,500 - - - 47,500 50,000 - - - 50,000 Replace synthetic turf in the Kompan mini soccer field. Based on heavy use of this facility surface replacement is expected to be needed at approximate 5 year intervals. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 211 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: First Green & Surrounds Rebuild Project No:gpbd17 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 25,000 - 25,000 Other - - - - - - 25,000 - 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 25,000 - 25,000 - - 25,000 - 25,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 25,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Eliminate closed contours through the design and installation of drainage improvements. Drainage improvements will include cutting and filling the site to proper grades, installing subsurface drainage, and grading all imported materials to a finished product. Sod will be cut and saved, and irrigation will be installed by golf course staff. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 212 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: 10th Green & Surrounds Rebuild Project No:gpbd18 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - 27,000 - Other - - - - - - - 27,000 - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 27,000 - - - - 27,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 27,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 27,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 27,000 - - - - 27,000 Install drainage improvements to remedy poor surface and subsurface drainage. Drainage improvements will include cutting and filling the site to proper grades, installing subsurface drainage, and grading all imported materials to a finished product. Sod will be cut and saved, and irrigation will be installed by golf course staff. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 213 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Fairway Drainage Improvement Project No:gpbd19 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 Other - - - - - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 60,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 60,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 60,000 - - - - 60,000 Apply top dressing sand to the first five fairways in order to firm up these landing areas so that the holes are playable year round. Sand will be applied with a three yard topdressing machine. Sand will be applied bi/weekly at a tenth of an inch of sand throughout the fairways. Fairways will start to show improvements once four inches of sand are applied. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 214 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Chemical Storage Container Project No:gpbd20 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 20,000 - 20,000 Other - - - - - - - 20,000 - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 20,000 - 20,000 - - 20,000 - 20,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 20,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Replace the existing chemical storage container with a new Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) approved container. The new container will be 8-feet wide by 20-feet long. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 215 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Topdressing Sand Storage Cover Structure Project No:gpbd21 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 45,000 - 45,000 Other - - - - - - - 45,000 - 45,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 45,000 - 45,000 - - 45,000 - 45,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 45,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 45,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 45,000 - - - - 45,000 Construct a structure for topdressing material, which is currently being stored in outdoor bunkers. The new structure will be similar to what Public Works M&O uses for their sanding and asphalt materials. The structure will be approximately 60-feet wide X 35-feet deep X 16-feet tall. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 216 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Les Gove Campus Security Cameras Project No:gpbd22 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - 20,000 - 20,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 20,000 - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 20,000 - 20,000 - - 20,000 - 20,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - 20,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Install infrared security cameras to both the interior areas of the park, and the northern parking lots. There will be three observations areas that will cover a majority of the approximate 25 -acres of park area. The system has off-site monitoring capabilities, which includes both web and smartphone viewing. The HD level cameras have zoom technology that will aid the Police Department, improve public safety, and decrease crime in and around the Les Gove Community Campus. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 217 TABLE PR-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets PARKS, ARTS & RECREATION - MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 Les Gove Park Imp.-$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 25,000$ - 2 Auburndale Park - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 20,000 3 Auburndale Park II - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,000 - - 4 Sunset Park 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 5 Lakeland Hills Nature Area - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 25,000 Total 10,000$ 20,000$ 27,000$ 27,000$ 27,000$ 27,000$ 138,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 218 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 219 SENIOR CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently has one Senior Center. Table PR-5 Facilities Inventory lists the facility along with its current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 151.40 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2016 citywide population of 77,060. The proposed LOS of 137.65 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2022 projected citywide population of 84,760. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any senior center capital facilities projects during 2017-2022. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the senior center facility during the six years 2018 – 2023. TABLE PR-5 Facilities Inventory Senior Center CAPACITY FACILITY (Square Feet)LOCATION Existing Inventory: Senior Center 11,667 808 9th Street SE Total Existing Inventory 11,667 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2022 Projected Inventory Total 11,667 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 220 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 221 GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Current Facilities The current inventory of City government administration and operations facilities include 196,114 square feet for general government operations, 61,680 square feet for police services, and 38,646 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 296,440 square feet. Table GM – 1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 3,846.87 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2016 citywide population of 77,060. The proposed LOS of 3,600.57 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2022 projected citywide population of 84,760. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s General Municipal Building facilities include eight capital projects at a cost of $2,620,000 and debt service at a cost of $3,935,776 for a total of $6,555,776. The major projects include (1) $930,000 for the Downtown Auburn Arts Center, (2) $470,000 for Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay (3) $320,000 for M&O Fuel Tank (4) $250,000 for City Hall Exterior Structural Repairs and $3,935,776 for City Hall Annex debt service costs. Table GM – 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table GM-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $475,000 are forecasted for General Municipal buildings facilities during the six years 2018 - 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 222 TABLE GM -1 Facilities Inventory General Municipal Buildings CAPACITY FACILITY (Square Feet)LOCATION Existing Inventory: General Government: City Hall 61,721 25 W Main Street City Hall Annex 45,034 1 W Main Street City Maintenance & Operations Facility 17,940 1305 C Street SW Community Center 13,973 910 9th Street SE Municipal Court (Justice Center-Leased to King County)12,200 340 E Main Street Activity Center 10,074 910 9th Street SE R Street Building 9,766 2840 Riverwalk Drive Youth Center 7,132 910 9th Street SE Auburn Valley Humane Society -(Leased to AVHS)5,900 4910 A Street GSA Building 5,580 2905 C Street SW #815 Les Gove Storage Building 4,044 910 9th Street SE Street Waste Handling Facility 2,750 1305 C Street SW Total 196,114 Police: Gun range 32,880 1600 Block 15th St NW Headquarters (Justice Center)24,800 340 E Main Street Seized vehicle parking stalls 3,000 2905 C Street SW GSA Building 1,000 2905 C Street SW #815 Total 61,680 Fire: Stations: GSA Station #35 16,526 2905 C Street SW North Station #31 12,220 1101 D Street NE South Station #32 5,200 1951 R Street SE Other Facilities: North Station Maint. Facility 4,700 1101 D Street NE Total 38,646 Total Existing Inventory 296,440 Proposed Capacity Projects: Downtown Auburn Arts Center 8,744 100 Auburn Avenue Total Proposed Capacity Projects 8,744 2022 Projected Inventory Total 305,184 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 223 TABLE GM -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: None Non-Capacity Projects: 1 M & O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 Operating Transfer -Water 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 Operating Transfer -Sewer 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 Operating Transfer -Storm 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 2 Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay Capital Costs 250,000 220,000 - - - - 470,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 62,500 55,000 - - - - 117,500 Operating Transfer -Water 62,500 55,000 - - - - 117,500 Operating Transfer -Sewer 62,500 55,000 - - - - 117,500 Operating Transfer -Storm 62,500 55,000 - - - - 117,500 3 M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Capital Costs 70,000 250,000 - - - - 320,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 17,500 62,500 - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Water 17,500 62,500 - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Sewer 17,500 62,500 - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Storm 17,500 62,500 - - - - 80,000 4 M&O Lunchroom Expansion Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 37,500 - - - - - 37,500 Operating Transfer -Water 37,500 - - - - - 37,500 Operating Transfer -Sewer 37,500 - - - - - 37,500 Operating Transfer -Storm 37,500 - - - - - 37,500 5 M&O Master Planning Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 12,500 12,500 - - - - 25,000 Operating Transfer -Water 12,500 12,500 - - - - 25,000 Operating Transfer -Sewer 12,500 12,500 - - - - 25,000 Operating Transfer -Storm 12,500 12,500 - - - - 25,000 6 Downtown Auburn Arts Center Capital Costs 293,000 637,000 - - - - 930,000 Funding Sources: Grants 293,000 637,000 - - - - 930,000 7 City Hall Exterior Structural Repairs Capital Costs - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 224 TABLE GM-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 8 City Hall Roof Replacement Capital Costs - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: REET 1 - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 9 City Hall Annex Long-Term Debt 645,037 645,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 Funding Sources: REET 1 645,037 645,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 913,000 1,707,000 - - - - 2,620,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Non-Capacity Projects 913,000 1,707,000 - - - - 2,620,000 Long-Term Debt 645,037 645,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 Total Costs 1,558,037 2,352,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 6,555,776 FUNDING SOURCES: Operating Transfer -Water 155,000 155,000 - - - - 310,000 Operating Transfer -Sewer 155,000 155,000 - - - - 310,000 Operating Transfer -Storm 155,000 155,000 - - - - 310,000 Grants 293,000 637,000 - - - - 930,000 REET 1 800,037 1,250,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 4,695,776 Total Funding 1,558,037 2,352,039 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 6,555,776 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 225 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Project No:cp0711 Project Type: Project Manager:Randy Bailey Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue 5,451 - - - 5,451 REET 1 - - 25,000 25,000 25,000 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 75,000 75,000 75,000 5,451 - 100,000 100,000 105,451 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 5,451 - 90,000 90,000 95,451 5,451 - 100,000 100,000 105,451 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 50,000 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 150,000 - - - - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 20,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 180,000 - - - - 200,000 Non-Capacity Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Enclose the 8 existing bays to provide necessary weather protection for street sweepers, vactors, sanding, and snow plow equipment. Construct storage shed to facilitate removal of portable containers, improving space utilization and traffic flow throughout M&O. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 226 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay Project No:cp1223 Project Type: Project Manager:Randy Bailey Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue 29,276 - - - 29,276 REET 1 - - 62,500 55,000 62,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 187,500 165,000 187,500 29,276 - 250,000 220,000 279,276 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 25,000 22,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 29,276 - 225,000 198,000 254,276 29,276 - 250,000 220,000 279,276 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 117,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 352,500 - - - - 470,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 47,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 423,000 - - - - 470,000 Non-Capacity Build additional vehicle bay at Equipment Rental shop for heavy equipment and large vehicles to improve efficiency and remove choke points. Adding a large vehicle bay with a large vehicle lift will enable us to perform inspections and maintenance on more than one large vehicle at a time, this becomes extremely important during emergency operations such as snow and ice events. The City currently has 2.5 maintenance bays, this project will add one more maintenance bay for a total of 3.5 bays. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 227 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Project No:erbd01 Project Type: Project Manager:Randy Bailey Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - 17,500 62,500 17,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 52,500 187,500 52,500 - - 70,000 250,000 70,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 7,000 25,000 7,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 63,000 225,000 63,000 - - 70,000 250,000 70,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 80,000 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 240,000 - - - - 320,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 32,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 288,000 - - - - 320,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project should reduce the operating budget due to lower maintenance and inspection costs. Non-Capacity Replace three 10,000 gallon underground tanks with new above ground tanks. The existing tanks were installed in 1989 and are single wall fiberglass tanks. It will be a benefit to the City to have the tanks above ground in the future due to the reduced maintenance and inspection cost. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 228 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Lunchroom Expansion Project No:erbd02 Project Type: Project Manager:Randy Bailey Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - 37,500 - 37,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 112,500 - 112,500 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 15,000 - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 135,000 - 135,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 37,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 112,500 - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 135,000 - - - - 150,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: None Non-Capacity Expansion of the current lunchroom by redesigning the area to accommodate All-Staff meetings, provide for a training facility, lunch room and also serve as the Department Operations Center (DOC) during an emergency event. In addition, the design will include sliding doors which will allow the area to serve two purposes at once, for example, one half of the room being used as a DOC and the other half open to employees to use as a lunch/break room. Progress Summary: This project will be designed and built in 2017 Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 229 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Maintenance and Operations Master Planning Project No:erbd03 Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - 12,500 12,500 12,500 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 37,500 37,500 37,500 - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 50,000 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 25,000 Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 75,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 100,000 None, but could generate future projects or improvements based on the outcome. Non capacity Use consulting services to look at current and future space needs for maintenance activities. This will encompass land, building and access needs at the existing site or other locations. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 230 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Downtown Auburn Arts Center Project No:cp1612 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State)- - 93,000 597,000 93,000 Grants- Secured (4Culture)- - 200,000 - 200,000 Grants - Local Unsecured - - - 40,000 - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - 293,000 637,000 293,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 93,000 - 93,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 200,000 637,000 200,000 - - 293,000 637,000 293,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State)- - - - 690,000 Grants- Secured (4Culture)- - - - 200,000 Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - 40,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 930,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 93,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 837,000 - - - - 930,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Renovation to the property and building located at 20 Auburn Avenue (100 Auburn Avenue) Building for the creation of an Downtown Auburn Arts Center. The renovation of this building will allow increased access to the arts for all of Auburn residents and visitors. Having a dedicated Art Center alongside the Auburn Avenue Theater performing arts series has the potential to transform Auburn into an arts tourism destination within the South Puget Sound. This project is a high priority for the City of Auburn and the purchase of this important building was completed in 2016. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual operating budget fiscal impact is estimated to be $95,000. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 231 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Hall Exterior Structural Repairs Project No:gcbd10 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - 250,000 - Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - 250,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - 250,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - - 250,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will fund City Hall exterior structural repairs Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 232 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Hall Roof Replacement Project No:gcbd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - 200,000 - Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - 200,000 - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - 200,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - - 200,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will replace the existing roof at City Hall. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 233 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Hall Annex Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 1,290,000 657,750 645,037 645,039 2,592,787 1,290,000 657,750 645,037 645,039 2,592,787 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 1,290,000 657,750 645,037 645,039 2,592,787 1,290,000 657,750 645,037 645,039 2,592,787 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 657,100 658,200 656,250 674,150 3,935,776 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: To pay scheduled debt service costs on 2010 General Obligation bonds issued for the City Hall Annex. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 234 TABLE GM-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 Downtown Auburn Arts Center -$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 475,000$ Total -$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 475,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 235 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Current Facilities Community Improvements include sidewalk and traffic signal improvements, neighborhood traffic calming program, Main Street urban design improvements, public art and phase 2 of the Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk project. Level of Service (LOS) No Level of Service for community improvement projects have been identified at this time. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s proposed Community Improvements include twelve capital projects at a cost of $16,272,821 and debt service at a cost of 1,337,519 for a total of $17,610,340. Table CI-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table CI-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $50,000 are forecasted for community improvement facilities during the six years 2018-2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 236 TABLE CI-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 1 Citywide ADA & Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - REET 2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 2 Annual Traffic Signal Replacement & Improvements Capital Costs 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 175,000 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 3 Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project Capital Costs 20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Other (Fund 124 -Traffic Imp.)20,000 - - - - - 20,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - 4 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Capital Costs 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 100,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 5 Public Art Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 6 City Wetland Mitigation Projects Capital Costs 31,570 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Other (Fund 124-Wetland Mit.)31,570 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 7 Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk -Phase 2 Capital Costs 35,000 800,000 - - - - 835,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 35,000 - - - - - 35,000 Grants - 800,000 - - - - 800,000 8 Wayfinding Program Capital Costs 25,000 35,000 - - - - 60,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 25,000 35,000 - - - - 60,000 9 Citywide Bridge Railing Replacements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - - 300,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - - 300,000 10 Citywide Street Lighting Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 11 Main Street Urban Design Improvements and Implementation Capital Costs - - - - 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 Funding Sources: Local Revitalization Fund - - - - - - - Other -To Be Determined - - - - 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 237 TABLE CI-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 12 City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration Capital Costs 326,251 - - - - - 326,251 Funding Sources: Local Revitalization Fund 326,251 - - - - - 326,251 Grants - - - - - - - 13 Local Revitalization Long Term Debt 222,510 226,109 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 Funding Sources: REET 2 222,510 226,109 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,142,821 1,595,000 785,000 685,000 11,385,000 680,000 16,272,821 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 1,142,821 1,595,000 785,000 685,000 11,385,000 680,000 16,272,821 Long-Term Debt 222,510 226,109 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 Total Costs 1,365,331 1,821,109 1,005,500 905,300 11,609,700 903,400 17,610,340 FUNDING SOURCES: Capital Improvement Fund 328 - - - - - - - Local Revitalization Fund 330 326,251 - - - - - 326,251 Grants - 800,000 - - - - 800,000 REET 2 987,510 1,016,109 1,000,500 900,300 904,700 903,400 5,712,519 Other -To Be Determined - - - - 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 Other (Fund 124 -Traffic Imp.)20,000 - - - - - 20,000 Other (Fund 124-Wetland Mit.)31,570 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 Total Funding 1,365,331 1,821,109 1,005,500 905,300 11,609,700 903,400 17,610,340 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 238 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide ADA & Sidewalk Improvements TIP #32 Project No:Various, gcbd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:Jai Carter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - 172,493 - - 172,493 Grants -Unsecured State - - - - - REET 2 - 400,000 200,000 200,000 600,000 Other - - - - - - 572,493 200,000 200,000 772,493 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 572,493 200,000 200,000 972,493 - 572,493 200,000 200,000 772,493 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants -Unsecured State - - - - - REET 2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Other - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project funds citywide accessibility improvements to the public right-of-way sidewalk system including adding/upgrading curb ramps, removing barriers to access and completing gaps. Improvements are programmed annually based on the criteria adopted in the City's Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Transition Plan. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 239 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Annual Traffic Signal Replacement & Improvements TIP #34 Project No:Various, gcbd07 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 Other - - - - - - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 - 175,000 175,000 175,000 350,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 Other - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,150,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project funds end of life capital replacement for traffic signal and Intelligent Transportation System equipment including cabinets, video detection cameras, field network devices, traffic cameras, battery backup components, and other related equipment. This project also funds minor safety improvements, operations improvements, and Accessible Pedestrian Signal Improvements based on the criteria adopted in the City's Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Transition Plan. Progress Summary: The project is ongoing and continues to successfully complete annual traffic signal improvement projects citywide. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 240 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Mohawks Plastics Site Mitigation Project TIP #13 Project No:cp0767 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Jeff Dixon/Shannon Howard LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 496,106 20,000 20,000 - 536,106 REET 2 78,283 - - - 78,283 574,389 20,000 20,000 - 614,389 Capital Expenditures: Design 170,706 - - - 170,706 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 403,683 20,000 20,000 - 443,683 574,389 20,000 20,000 - 614,389 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 20,000 REET 2 - - - - - - - - - 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 20,000 - - - - 20,000 Description: The project consists of the design, construction, maintenance and monitoring of approximately 2.2-acres of wetland creation and approximately 0.4-acres of wetland enhancement within the Goedecke South Property owned by the Sewer Utility in order to compensate for the loss of approximately 1.6-acre of wetlands on the Mohawk Plastics property (Parcel # 1321049056). The project was approved under an existing agreement approved by Resolution No. 4196, June 2007. Progress Summary: The City received the DOE WQ Certification, WDFW HPA, and on May 7, 2009, the Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) 404 wetland permit (NWS-2007-1913). Subsequently, bid specifications and construction plans were prepared and construction began in October 2009. Construction was completed in January 2010 and the project is currently within the 10- year monitoring period, which involves annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting. Staff anticipates to receive early release from the monitoring period in 2016 or 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: It is anticipated that annual maintenance, monitoring and reporting on the performance of the wetland mitigation project will be required for a period of 10 years, in conformance with permit requirements. After the successful conclusion of the monitoring period through early release, which is anticipated to be no later than December 2017, ongoing operation expenses should be minimal. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 241 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program TIP #33 Project No:gcbd06 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:TBD Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - 194,000 100,000 150,000 294,000 Other - - - - - - 194,000 100,000 150,000 294,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 194,000 100,000 150,000 294,000 - 194,000 100,000 150,000 294,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 Other - - - - - 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 850,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will implement neighborhood traffic calming strategies including street lighting, speed cushions, signage, speed radar signs, mini roundabouts, chicanes, traffic circles, and other approved traffic calming devices. Projects will be selected annually based on neighborhood meetings, public surveys, and engineering studies. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 242 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Public Art Project No: gcbd02 Project Type: Project Manager: Julie Krueger Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 30,000 103,000 30,000 30,000 163,000 Other - - - - - 30,000 103,000 30,000 30,000 163,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 30,000 103,000 30,000 30,000 163,000 30,000 103,000 30,000 30,000 163,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Other - - - - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None The City designates $30,000 annually toward the purchase of public art, for placement at designated locations throughout the City. Progress Summary: Arts Commission will meet to assess future needs and seek approval from City Council on placement. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 243 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Wetland Mitigation Projects Project No:cp1315 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Chris Andersen Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Fund 124 Wetland Mitigation Account 4,355 - 31,570 5,000 35,925 REET - - - - - 4,355 - 31,570 5,000 35,925 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 4,355 - 21,570 5,000 25,925 4,355 - 31,570 5,000 35,925 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Fund 124 Wetland Mitigation Account 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 REET - - - - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 41,570 5,000 5,000 5,000 - 51,570 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project designs and constructs off-site wetland mitigation in the Auburn Environmental Park for participating development projects as approved through the City's development review process. Design, construction, monitoring, and maintenance of the mitigation is funded through wetland mitigation fees collected by the City. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: After construction, each wetland mitigation site will be monitored and maintained for a period of three to five years, depending on the specific requirements for the project. Funding for future year monitoring and maintenance is included in the development fees collected by the City, and is budgeted as part of the Capital Facilities Plan. Replacement plantings for Auburn Airport tree removal conducted in 2013. Design and construction of mitigation for other development sites deferred to 2017. Years 2018-2021 scheduled for site monitoring only. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 244 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk - Phase 2 Project No:cp1611 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Chris Andersen Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - 550,000 - Grants - Local Unsecured - - - 250,000 - REET 2 - 40,000 35,000 - 75,000 Other -TBD - - - - - - 40,000 35,000 800,000 75,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 40,000 35,000 - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 800,000 - - 40,000 35,000 800,000 75,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - - 550,000 Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - 250,000 REET 2 - - - - 35,000 Other -TBD - - - - - - - - - 835,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 35,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 800,000 - - - - 835,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The Auburn Environmental Park (AEP) provides vegetated natural open space within an urbanized area. The AEP provides opportunities for local economic development, water quality improvement, storm water detention, flood control, fish and wildlife enhancement, visual resources, public education, and passive recreation, including walking trails and bird viewing amenities. In 2012, the City completed the construction of approximately 1,200 lineal feet of the first phase (Phase 1) of an elevated boardwalk trail in the Auburn Environmental Park (AEP). This trail extended from West Main Street through existing wetlands in the AEP terminating at the base of the Bird Viewing Tower constructed in 2009. As part of the construction of the elevated boardwalk, the City also installed interpretative signage, bench seating, limited new vehicle parking on Western Avenue and over two acres of wetland species of trees, plants and shrubs. Phase 2 of the elevated boardwalk trail would construct a combination of up to approximately 2,000 lineal feet of surface trail and elevated boardwalk trail from the current terminus at the Bird Viewing Tower to a connection with the Interurban Trail. The Phase 2 project will further previous and current Councils’ visions of the AEP providing passive recreation and environmental education opportunities for all Auburn citizens. Progress Summary: Design for this project is scheduled to start in fall of 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Construction of the Phase 2 project is anticipated to incur approximately $10,000 in annual operating costs to the City’s operating budget. Operating costs are addressed in the Environmental Services portion of the Community Development and Public Works Department operating budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 245 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Wayfinding Program Project No:gcbd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Tate Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - REET 2 - - 25,000 35,000 25,000 Other - - - - - - - 25,000 35,000 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 25,000 - 25,000 Right of Way - - - 35,000 - Construction - - - - - - - 25,000 35,000 25,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - REET 2 - - - - 60,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 60,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - 35,000 Construction - - - - - - - - - 60,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Phase 1: Develop a citywide wayfinding design and strategy. This phase will include a pedestrian strategy for downtown and a vehicular strategy that would be deployed citywide. The design effort will include identification of key locations to install wayfinding signage as well as the look and appearance of signage. Phase 2: Produce and deploy wayfinding signage consistent with the design developed in phase 1. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 246 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide Bridge Railing Replacements Project No:gcbd08 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 100,000 - - - 300,000 100,000 - - - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction 100,000 - - - 300,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - 100,000 - - - 300,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will fund the refinishing/replacement of bridge railings for the 15th Street NW Bridges over the BNSF and UP Railroads and the Auburn Way South Bridge over R Street SE. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 247 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide Street Lighting Improvements Project No:gcbd09 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 This project will fund street lighting improvements in neighborhoods without existing infrastructure. Projects will be selected from prioritized list developed with neighborhood input. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 248 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Main Street Urban Design Improvements and Implementation Project No:cpxxxx Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (TBD)- - - - - Other (GO Bond)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (TBD)- - 10,700,000 10,700,000 Other (GO Bond)- - - - - - - 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 2,307,843 - 2,307,843 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 8,392,157 - 8,392,157 - - 10,700,000 - 10,700,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The Main Street Urban Design Project was initiated in 2015 following approval by City Council to include it within the Capital Facilities Plan and to authorize expenditure of funds in the recruitment and hiring of a consultant. The Project has a completion date of Summer 2016 following City Council review and acceptance. The Main Street Urban Design Project was intended as a visioning and citizen engagement effort to identify a preferred future urban streetscape design for Main Street between C Street SW/NW and F Street SE/NE. During the planning process, the project consultant and City staff engaged with property owners, business owners, citizens, residents, other interested parties and different City departments to develop an updated streetscape design for this section of Main Street that also addressed key street engineering needs and concerns. Since the inception of the Project, the project team has also presented the ideas, options and concepts to City Council in order to obtain their feedback and gauge their support for the long term vision of Main Street. The key project deliverables were a conceptual streetscape design and a preliminary overall cost estimate of the conceptual design. Going forward, the Project will include three phases. The first phase is scheduled to occur in 2021 and has an estimated current cost of $10.7 million. The second phase is scheduled to occur in 2023 and has an estimated current cost of $4.3 million. The third phase is scheduled to occur in 2025 and has an estimated current cost of $8.7 million. The Project will also address storm drainage system needs, street subgrade stability and surface improvements and street and adjacent property/building grade issues. A financing plan that will identify potential methods to fund improvements will be prepared following City Council acceptance. Progress Summary: This project is in the conceptual urban design development phase. In Summer 2016, the conceptual design and estimated project cost will be presented to the Auburn City Council for review and acceptance. If supported by City Council, a more detailed phasing plan and financing plan will be prepared. Future substantive design and construction plan documentation will be dependent upon subsequent Council approvals for financing and phased project scopes. Future Impact on Operating Budget: A financing plan addressing capital costs and operating/maintenance costs will be prepared following City Council’s acceptance of the conceptual urban streetscape design. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 249 LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration Project No: cp1616 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Ingrid Gaub Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Local Revitalization Fund 330 - 30,000 326,251 - 356,251 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other (GO Bonds)- - - - - - 30,000 326,251 - 356,251 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 30,000 326,251 - 356,251 - 30,000 326,251 - 356,251 Total 2018 2019 2020 2021 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Local Revitalization Fund 330 - - - - 326,251 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other (GO Bonds)- - - - - - - - - 326,251 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 326,251 - - - - 326,251 Reconfigure the City owned public parking lot between Safeway and Main Street to address pedestrian and vehicular circulation; remove existing landscaping to allow more flexibility in the parking lot redesign; explore whether more parking stalls can be added to the lot to aid in providing additional customer parking within Downtown Auburn; and resurface the parking lot. Progress Summary: Begin design in 2016 with construction potentially starting towards the end of 2016 and completion in 2017. Revised 6/9/2016: Monies to improve the parking lot adjacent to Safeway and the B Street Plaza will be used to create safety and aesthetic improvements to the plaza. New catenary lighting and planters will be added to the plaza as a short- to medium- term improvement. The lighting will increase safety and the planters will be added to delineate walking paths and create visual interest. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None anticipated as the City already maintains the parking lot. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 250 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Local Revitalization Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 430,600 222,600 222,510 226,109 875,710 430,600 222,600 222,510 226,109 875,710 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 430,600 222,600 222,510 226,109 875,710 430,600 222,600 222,510 226,109 875,710 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 220,500 220,300 224,700 223,400 1,337,519 To pay debt service costs on 2010 General Obligation bonds issued for the Downtown Promenade Improvements. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 251 TABLE CI-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 AEP Boardwalk -Phase 2 -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 50,000$ Total -$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 10,000$ 50,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 252 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 253 AIRPORT Current Facilities The City of Auburn operates the Auburn Municipal Airport, providing hangar and tie-down facilities/leasing space for aircraft-related businesses. As of 2012, there were approximately 96,036 take-offs and landings (aircraft operations) at the airport annually. This number is forecasted in the 2015 Airport Master Plan to increase to 98,129 take-offs and landings. Table A-1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities with current capacity and location. The Airport Master Plan was completed in May 2015 for the period 2012 through 2032. Level of Service (LOS) The Auburn Municipal Airport Master Plan provides a maximum runway capacity (LOS standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annually; one take-off or landing equals one aircraft operation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA requires the airport to have the capital facilities capacity (i.e., runways, taxiways, holding areas, terminal, hangars, water/sewer system, etc.) necessary to accommodate 100% of aircraft operations during any one year. By 2022 the Airport Master Plan forecasts the number of operations to be 198,623 – well below the capacity of the airport runway. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s Airport facilities include twelve non-capacity capital projects at a cost of $ 5,131,249. These projects include the Runway Enhancements project, Jet A Fueling facility, Automated Weather Observation System, seal coating and land acquisition for future approaches. Table A- 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table A-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $16,000 are forecasted for Airport facilities during the six years 2018 – 2023. TABLE A-1 Facilities Inventory Airport FACILITY # of Aircraft # of Feet LOCATION Existing Inventory: Hangars (Public)145 2301 E Street NE Hangars (Private)103 2301 E Street NE Tiedowns 153 2301 E Street NE Air Strip 3,400 2301 E Street NE Total Existing Inventory 401 3,400 Proposed Capacity Projects: 2020 Land Acquisition 30 2301 E Street NE 2018 Runway Extension - 718 2301 E Street NE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 30 718 2022 Projected Inventory Total 431 4,118 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 254 TABLE A-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING AIRPORT 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Capacity Projects: None - Non-Capacity Projects: 1 Runway Enhancements Capital Costs 333,334 1,833,334 - - - - 2,166,668 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 16,667 91,667 - - - - 108,334 Grants 316,667 1,741,667 - - - - 2,058,334 2 Jet A Fueling Facility Capital Costs 10,000 - - 50,000 350,000 - 410,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 10,000 - - 50,000 - - 60,000 Other - - - - 350,000 - 350,000 Grants - - - - - - - 3 Annual Repair and Replacement of Airport Facilities Capital Costs 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Grants - - - - - - - 4 Automated Weather Observation System Capital Costs - - 111,112 222,224 - - 333,336 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - 5,556 11,112 - - 16,668 Grants - - 105,556 211,112 - - 316,668 5 Taxiway Seal Coat & Restripe Capital Costs - - - 50,120 - - 50,120 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - 2,506 - - 2,506 Grants - - - 47,614 - - 47,614 6 Airport Security Camera & Gate Access Upgrades Capital Costs - - - 70,000 - - 70,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - 70,000 - - 70,000 Grant - - - - - - - 7 Runway 16/34 Sealcoat Capital Costs - - - 475,000 - - 475,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - 23,750 - - 23,750 Grants - - - 451,250 - - 451,250 8 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway Capital Costs - - - - 168,000 - 168,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - 168,000 - 168,000 Grants - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 255 TABLE A-2 (continued) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 9 Asset Inventory and Condition Assessment Capital Costs - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - - 10 Land Acquisition for Future Approaches Capital Costs - - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - 25,000 - 25,000 Grants - - - - 475,000 - 475,000 11 Land Acquisition Capital Costs - - - - - 735,205 735,205 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - - 36,760 36,760 Grants - - - - - 698,445 698,445 12 West Side Fencing Capital Costs - - - - - 52,920 52,920 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - - 2,646 2,646 Grants - - - - - 50,274 50,274 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 363,334 1,853,334 131,112 887,344 1,088,000 808,125 5,131,249 Total Costs 363,334 1,853,334 131,112 887,344 1,088,000 808,125 5,131,249 FUNDING SOURCES: Airport Fund 46,667 111,667 25,556 177,368 263,000 59,406 683,664 Other - - - - 350,000 - 350,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)316,667 1,741,667 105,556 709,976 475,000 748,719 4,097,585 Total Funding 363,334 1,853,334 131,112 887,344 1,088,000 808,125 5,131,249 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 256 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Runway Enhancements Project No:cp1516 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue 2,465 17,023 16,667 91,667 36,155 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - 300,000 150,000 300,000 Federal Grant -Secured 44,365 175,888 - - 220,253 Federal Grant -Unsecured - 1,500,000 - State Grant -Secured 2,465 9,696 - - 12,161 State Grant -Unsecured - - 16,667 91,667 16,667 49,295 202,607 333,334 1,833,334 585,236 Capital Expenditures: Design - 333,334 333,334 Environmental Assessment 49,295 202,607 251,902 Construction - 1,833,334 - 49,295 202,607 333,334 1,833,334 585,236 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - 108,334 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - - - 450,000 Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - 1,500,000 State Grant -Unsecured - - - - 108,334 - - - - 2,166,668 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 333,334 Environmental Assessment - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,833,334 - - - - 2,166,668 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Enhance Runway 16/34 per Airport Layout Plan & Master Plan Update for increased safety and utilization. This also includes the As-built AGIS Survey that is required following the runway construction. Progress Summary: Environmental Assessment is to be completed in 2015 - 2016, Design planned for 2017 and construction is anticipated to begin in 2018. Budget has been adjusted to account for the anticipated funding plan identified by FAA for Design and Construction of the project per their letter of February 2, 2016. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 257 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Jet A Fueling Facility Project No:apbd04 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 10,000 - Other -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - 10,000 - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 10,000 - 10,000 - - 10,000 - 10,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 50,000 - - 60,000 Other -Unsecured - - 350,000 - 350,000 State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - 50,000 350,000 - 410,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 350,000 - 360,000 - 50,000 350,000 - 410,000 Construct any necessary site improvements to accommodate a temporary 2,200 gallon fueling truck for Jet A fuel on site in 2017. Design and Construct a permanent 12,000 gallon Fuel Tank for Jet A service at Airport in 2020 and 2021 after the runway extension is complete and demand for Jet A fuel is established. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: On-going operational costs will be minimal as the estimated $5,000/month expenses will be offset by fuel sale revenues. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 258 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Repair and Replacement of Airport Facilities Project No:apbd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 20,000 20,000 20,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This is an annual repair and replacement program for the purpose of completing repairs to site fencing, hanger doors, fueling facilities, roof repairs, etc. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 259 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Automated Weather Observation System Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal - Non-Primary Entitlements - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 5,556 11,112 - - 16,668 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlements 100,000 200,000 - - 300,000 State Grant -Unsecured 5,556 11,112 - - 16,668 111,112 222,224 - - 333,336 Capital Expenditures: Design 111,112 - - - 111,112 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 222,224 - - 222,224 111,112 222,224 - - 333,336 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Install weather reporting equipment for instrument approach. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: $2,000 annually for on-going maintenance and repair City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 260 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Taxiway Seal Coat & Restripe Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 2,506 - - 2,506 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlements - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - 45,108 - - 45,108 State Grant -Unsecured - 2,506 - - 2,506 - 50,120 - - 50,120 Capital Expenditures: Design - 7,518 - - 7,518 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 42,602 - - 42,602 - 50,120 - - 50,120 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation This project will provide funding for seal coating and restriping of the taxiway that was replaced in 2009. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 261 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Airport Security Camera & Gate Access Upgrades Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 70,000 - 70,000 Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - 70,000 - - 70,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 10,500 - - 10,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 59,500 - 59,500 - 70,000 - - 70,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Increased security identified by the Federal Aviation Administration and the Transportation Security Administration for Airport control access gates (both vehicle and personnel). This project will install security cameras and replace the obsolete gate operator access control units. The proposed system will include cards and keypad operation with both inbound and outbound tracking of the authorized tenant/guest. Personnel gates will also have the same system. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Estimated to be $2,000 annually to conduct maintenance and repair activities as needed. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 262 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Runway 16/34 Sealcoat Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 23,750 - - 23,750 federal - non-Primary Entitlements - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - 427,500 - - 427,500 State Grant -Unsecured - 23,750 - - 23,750 - 475,000 - - 475,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 47,500 - - 47,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 427,500 - - 427,500 - 475,000 - - 475,000 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Unmaintained asphalt can crack allowing water penetration which then weaken the subsurface creating a larger area of failure making an unsafe environment for departing or landing during a critical phase of flight. The FAA recommends a seal coat every 5 years to extend the life of the asphalt. It is less expensive to maintain the asphalt than to rehab or reconstruct. This project should include any crack sealing, sealcoat and repainting of the runway environment. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 263 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 168,000 - 168,000 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - 168,000 - 168,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 33,600 - 33,600 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 134,400 - 134,400 - - 168,000 - 168,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Install Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway to replace aging Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) system. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: $2,000 annually for on-going maintenance and repair City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 264 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Asset Inventory and Condition Assessment Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City owned structural facilities at the Airport are generally older and as such, require on-going maintenance to ensure that they remain viable and in relatively good shape to provide value to the Airport Enterprise Fund. This project will complete an inventory and condition assessment of the existing City owned structure faculties at the Airport and develop a maintenance program. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 265 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Land Acquisition for Future Approaches Project No:cpxxxx Project Type: Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 25,000 - 25,000 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement 150,000 - 150,000 Federal Grant -Unsecured - - 300,000 - 300,000 State Grant -Unsecured - - 25,000 - 25,000 - - 500,000 - 500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - 500,000 - 500,000 Construction - - - - - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: None Total Funding Sources: Non-Capacity Acquire land at the current Park and Ride for future approaches. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 266 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Land Acquisition Project No:cpxxxx Project Type: Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - 36,760 36,760 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlement - - - 150,000 150,000 Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - 511,685 511,685 State Grant -Unsecured - - - 36,760 36,760 - - - 735,205 735,205 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition - - - 735,205 735,205 Construction - - - - - - - - 735,205 735,205 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: None Non-Capacity Land Acquisition-Armstrong Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 267 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2017-2022 Enterprise Funds Project Title: West Side Fencing Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kevin Snyder Description: Activity: 2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - 2,646 2,646 Federal Grant -Unsecured - - - 47,628 47,628 State Grant -Unsecured - - - 2,646 2,646 - - - 52,920 52,920 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 5,292 5,292 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 47,628 47,628 - - - 52,920 52,920 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Install fence on west side of property to complete perimeter security fencing and help control wildlife on the airport. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 268 TABLE A-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets AIRPORT Project:2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total 1 Automated Weather Observation System -$ -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 6,000$ 2 Airport Security Camera & Gate Access Upgrades - - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 6,000 3 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway - - - - 2,000 2,000 4,000 Total -$ -$ -$ 4,000$ 6,000$ 6,000$ 16,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 269 CEMETERY Current Facilities The City owns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (60 acres and five buildings) that provides burial services and related merchandise for the community. The Pioneer Cemetery is a historic cemetery which is no longer used for burial purposes. Table C-1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 38 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2016 citywide population of 77,060. The proposed LOS of 48 burial plots/niches per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2022 projected citywide population of 84,760. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any Cemetery capital facilities projects during 2017 - 2022. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery during the six years 2018 – 2023. TABLE C-1 Facilities Inventory Cemetery CAPACITY FACILITY # of Burial Plots/Niches LOCATION Existing Inventory: Mountain View Cemetery 2,901 2020 Mountain View Dr. Pioneer Cemetery - 8th & Auburn Way No. Total Existing Inventory 2,901 Proposed Capacity Projects: New Development - Burial Plots 660 Memory Heights New Development - Burial Plots 500 10th Addition Total Proposed Capacity Projects 1,160 2022 Projected Inventory Total 4,061 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 270 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 271 POLICE Current Facilities The City of Auburn Police Department provides a full range of law enforcement services to the citizens of Auburn. All Divisions of the Auburn Police Department are housed at 340 East Main Street, Suite 201. The Divisions include Patrol, Investigations, Administrative Services, Inspectional Services, and Records. Level of Service (LOS) The City of Auburn Police Department contracts with SCORE, an outside entity, for housing of all misdemeanant inmates. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any Police capital facilities projects during 2017 - 2022. Impact on Future Operating Budgets The jail services expenses are dependent on the City’s contract agreement with SCORE. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 272 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 273 FIRE PROTECTION Current Facilities The Valley Regional Fire Authority provides fire protection and rescue services to a 25-square mile area which includes the City of Auburn, the City of Algona, the City of Pacific and King County Fire Protection District 31. The Valley Regional Fire Authority operates out of five stations, which are manned 24 hours per day. The North Station #31 also serves as the department headquarters and includes a hose and training tower. Each station is assigned fire apparatus (Engines and Aid Vehicles). Table F–1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 0.22 fire apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory (17 fire apparatus) divided by the 2016 citywide population of 77,060. The proposed LOS of 0.21 fire apparatus per 1,000 is based on the 2022 planned inventory (18 fire apparatus) divided by the 2022 projected citywide population of 84,760. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one capital project at a cost of $100,000 for fire apparatus enhancements and improvements. Table F-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by an individual worksheet showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for fire protection during the six years 2018 – 2023. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 274 TABLE F-1 Facilities Inventory Valley Regional Fire Authority FACILITY Fire Apparatus Aid Vehicles LOCATION Existing Inventory: Stations: North Station #31 1101 'D' Street NE, Auburn First Line 2 1 Reserve 1 1 South Station #32 1951 'R' Street SE, Auburn First Line 1 1 Reserve 1 1 Lakeland Station #33 500 182nd Ave E, Auburn First Line 1 - Reserve 1 - Lea Hill Station #34 31290 124th Ave SE, Auburn First Line 1 - Reserve 1 - GSA Station #35 2815 C St SW, Auburn Reserve 1 1 Pacific Station #38 133 3rd Ave SE, Pacific First Line 1 - Reserve 1 - Total Existing Inventory 12 5 Proposed Inventory Additions: First Line 1 - Total Proposed Capacity Projects 1 - 2021 Projected Inventory Total 13 5 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 275 TABLE F-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 1 Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements & Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Grants - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Impact/Mitigation Fees 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Costs 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Impact/Mitigation Fees 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Funding 50,000 50,000 - - - - 100,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 276 Valley Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2015-2020 Project Title: Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements & Improvements Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Mark Horaski Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2016 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2016 Estimate 2017 Budget 2018 Budget Project Total Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact/Mitigation Fees 460,000 400,000 50,000 50,000 910,000 460,000 400,000 50,000 50,000 910,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 460,000 400,000 50,000 50,000 910,000 460,000 400,000 50,000 50,000 910,000 Total 2019 2020 2021 2022 2017-2022 Funding Sources: Grants - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Impact/Mitigation Fees - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures:- Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Facility Improvement projects are identified and prioritized annually and are subject to delay to accommodate emergency repairs. The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one project for apparatus enhancements and improvements. Progress Summary: Fire mitigation and impact fees will be transferred to the Valley Regional Fire Authority to pay for apparatus enhancements and improvements. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 1 of 22 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: The adoption of the Auburn School District's 2016-2022 Capital Facilities Plan ("Capital Facilities Plan") for the purposes of planning for the District's facilities needs. King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent will incorporate the District's Capital Facilities Plan into each jurisdiction’s respective Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may incorporate the District’s Capital Facilities Plan into SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 2 of 22 each jurisdiction’s respective Comprehensive Plans. A copy of the District's draft Capital Facilities Plan is available for review in the District's offices. 2. Name of applicant: Auburn School District No. 408 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Auburn School District No. 408 915 4th Street NE Auburn, WA 98002 Contact Person: Bob Kenworthy, Assistant Director, Capital Projects Telephone: (253) 931-4826 4. Date checklist prepared: May 23, 2016 5. Agency requesting checklist: Auburn School District No. 408 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): The Capital Facilities Plan is scheduled to be adopted by the District’s Board of Directors on or about June 13, 2016. After adoption, the District will forward the Capital Facilities Plan to the King County and the cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific for inclusion into each jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Plans. The District will continue to update the Capital Facilities Plan on a regular basis. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. The Capital Facilities Plan identifies the capital improvement projects that the District plans to implement over the next six years. The District plans to construct two new elementary schools, replace five elementary schools, and replace one middle school. The District also plans to add portables at existing schools. In addition, the District plans for technology upgrades at all facilities, miscellaneous facility updates at multiple sites, and the acquisition of school sites. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 3 of 22 The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have undergone or will undergo additional environmental review, when appropriate, as they are developed. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. None known. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. The District anticipates that King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent will adopt the Capital Facilities Plan as part of each jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Plan. The cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may incorporate the District’s Capital Facilities Plan into each jurisdiction’s respective Comprehensive Plans. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) This is a nonproject action. This proposal involves the adoption of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2022 for the purpose of planning the District's facilities needs. The District's Capital Facilities Plan will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the City of Auburn. The cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond may incorporate the District’s Capital Facilities Plan into each jurisdiction’s respective Comprehensive Plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review when appropriate. A copy of the Capital Facilities Plan may be viewed at the District's offices. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. The Capital Facilities Plan will affect the Auburn School District. The District includes an area of approximately 62 square miles. Portions of unincorporated King County and the cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific are served by the District. A detailed map of the District's boundaries can be viewed at the District's offices. B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS [help] 1. Earth SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 4 of 22 a. General description of the site: (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other _X____________ The Auburn School District is comprised of a variety of topographic land forms and gradients. Specific topographic characteristics of the sites at which the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan are located have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Specific slope characteristics at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. Specific soil types found at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Project-level environmental review for any projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will include identification of any agricultural soils and associated impacts. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Unstable soils may exist within the Auburn School District. Specific soil limitations on individual project sites have been or will be identified at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject, when appropriate, to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time of proposal. Proposed grading projects, as well as the purpose, type, total area, quantity, grading proposed, and source of any fill materials to be used have been or will be identified at that time. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of the construction projects currently proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan. The erosion impacts of the individual projects have been or will be evaluated on a site-specific basis at the time of project-level environmental review when appropriate. Individual projects have been or will be subject SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 5 of 22 to local approval processes. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have required or will require the construction of impervious surfaces. The extent of any impervious cover constructed will vary with each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan. This issue has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: The erosion potential of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and appropriate control measures have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Relevant erosion reduction and control requirements have been or will be met. 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Various emissions may result from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The air quality impacts of each project, including during construction, operation, and maintenance, have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. Any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: The individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and relevant local approval processes when appropriate. The District has been or will be required to comply with all applicable air regulations and air permit requirements. Proposed measures specific to the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 6 of 22 3. Water a. Surface Water: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. There is a network of surface water bodies within the Auburn School District. The surface water bodies that are in the immediate vicinity of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. When necessary, the surface water regimes and flow patterns have been or will be researched and incorporated into the designs of the individual projects. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require work near the surface waters located within the Auburn School District. Applicable local approval requirements have been or will be satisfied. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Information with respect to the placement or removal of fill and dredge material as a component of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Applicable local regulations have been or will be satisfied. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Any surface water withdrawals or diversions required in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Each project included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if located in a floodplain area, has been or will be required to meet applicable local regulations for flood areas. 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. Specific information regarding the discharge of waste materials that may be required as SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 7 of 22 a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may impact groundwater resources. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on groundwater resources has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. The discharges of waste material that may take place in connection with the projects included in the Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review. c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may have stormwater runoff consequences. Specific information regarding the stormwater impacts of each project has been or will be provided during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local stormwater regulations. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may result in the discharge of waste materials into ground or surface waters. The specific impacts of each project on ground and surface waters have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to all applicable regulations regarding the discharge of waste SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 8 of 22 materials into ground and surface waters. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns. The impact of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on drainage patterns has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project has been or will be subject to applicable local regulations. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: Specific measures to reduce or control runoff impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. 4. Plants a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: ____deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ____evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ____shrubs ____grass ____pasture ____crop or grain ____ Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ____ wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ____water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ____other types of vegetation A variety of vegetative zones are located within the Auburn School District. Inventories of the vegetation located on the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Some of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require the removal or alteration of vegetation. The specific impacts on vegetation of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 9 of 22 c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. The specific impacts to these species from the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Measures to preserve or enhance vegetation at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local landscaping requirements. e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of noxious weeks and invasive species located on or near sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ________ An inventory of species that have been observed on or near the sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be developed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on migration routes have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 10 of 22 Appropriate measures to preserve or enhance wildlife have been or will be determined during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. Inventories of invasive animal species located on or near sites of the projects proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction requires the completion of a life- cycle cost analysis of all heating, lighting, and insulation systems before it will permit specific school projects to proceed. The energy needs of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined at the time of specific engineering and site design planning when appropriate. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on the solar potential of adjacent projects have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: Energy conservation measures proposed in connection with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be considered during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 11 of 22 Known or possible contamination on sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. Hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect the project development and design on sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. Toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the development, construction, or operation of any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan comply or will comply with all current codes, standards, rules, and regulations. Individual projects have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval at the time they are developed, when appropriate. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? A variety of noises from traffic, construction, residential, commercial, and industrial areas exists within the Auburn School District. The specific noise sources that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi- cate what hours noise would come from the site. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create normal construction noises that will exist on short-term basis only. The construction projects could increase SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 12 of 22 traffic around the construction sites on a short-term basis. Please see the Supplemental Sheet for Nonproject Actions. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: The projected noise impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated and mitigated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Each project is or will be subject to applicable local regulations. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. There are a variety of land uses in the Auburn School District, including residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, utility, open space, recreational, etc. Impacts of projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on land uses on nearby or adjacent properties have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or nonforest use? Identification of the use of sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan as working farmlands or working forest land has been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: Any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be analyzed during project-level environmental review when appropriate to determine if the proposal will affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest lands. c. Describe any structures on the site. The structures located on the sites for the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 13 of 22 The structures that will be demolished as a result of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, if any, have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? The sites that are covered under the Capital Facilities Plan have a variety of zoning classifications under the applicable zoning codes. Site-specific zoning information has been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Inventories of the comprehensive plan designations for the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be completed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Shoreline master program designations of the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. Any critical areas located on the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified during project-level environmental review. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? The Auburn School District currently serves approximately 15,663 students. Enrollment is projected to increase over the six year planning period. The District employs approximately 1,650 people. j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Any displacement of people caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. However, it is not anticipated that the Capital Facilities Plan, or any of the projects contained therein, will displace any people. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to project-level environmental review and local approval when SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 14 of 22 appropriate. Proposed mitigating measures have been or will be developed at that time, when necessary. L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with existing uses and plans has been or will be assessed as part of the comprehensive planning process and during project-level environmental review when appropriate. m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: The compatibility of the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance has been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid- dle, or low-income housing. No housing units would be provided in connection with the completion of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. It is not anticipated that the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will eliminate any housing units. The impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan on existing housing have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Measures to reduce or control any housing impacts caused by the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 15 of 22 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? The aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Appropriate measures to reduce or control the aesthetic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be determined on a project-level basis when appropriate. 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review, when appropriate. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? The light or glare impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be evaluated during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: Proposed measures to mitigate light and glare impacts have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? There are a variety of formal and informal recreational facilities within the Auburn School District. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 16 of 22 The recreational impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan, including proposed new school facilities, may enhance recreational opportunities and uses. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Adverse recreational effects of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be subject to mitigation during project-level environmental review when appropriate. School facilities usually provide recreational facilities to the community in the form of play fields and gymnasiums. 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. Any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or proposed eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers on or near sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. Any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation, or material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance, on or near sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. Any relevant methods utilized at sites intended for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 17 of 22 Any needed relevant measures proposed to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources, including necessary plans and permits, for any projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be identified and described during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The impacts on public streets and highways of the individual projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? The relationship between the specific projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and public transit has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? Inventories of parking spaces located at the sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan and the impacts of specific projects on parking availability have been or will be conducted during project-level environmental review when appropriate. d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). The need for new streets or roads, or improvements to existing streets and roads has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Use of water, rail, or air transportation has been or will be addressed during project- level environmental review when appropriate. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 18 of 22 The traffic impacts of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. The potential impact of any project proposed in the Capital Facilities Plan on the movement of agricultural or forest products on roads and streets has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: The mitigation of transportation impacts associated with the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan has been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. The District does not anticipate that the projects identified in the Capital Facilities Plan will significantly increase the need for public services. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. New school facilities have been or will be built with automatic security systems, fire alarms, smoke alarms, heat sensors, and sprinkler systems. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ___________ Electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, and sanitary sewer utilities are available at the known sites of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan. The types of utilities available at specific project sites have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level environmental review when appropriate. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Utility revisions and construction needs have been or will be identified during project- SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 19 of 22 level environmental review when appropriate. C. Signature The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: ___________________________________________________ Name of signee __________________________________________________ Position and Agency/Organization ____________________________________ Date Submitted: _____________ SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 20 of 22 D. supplemental sheet for nonproject actions (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro- duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? To the extent the Capital Facilities Plan makes it more likely that school facilities will be constructed, some of these environmental impacts may be more likely. Additional impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, access roads, and sidewalks could increase stormwater runoff, which could enter surface or ground waters. Heating systems, emergency generators, and other school equipment that is installed pursuant to the Capital Facilities Plan could result in air emissions. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan should not require the production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances, with the possible exception of the storage of diesel fuel or gasoline for emergency generating equipment. The District does not anticipate a significant increase in the production of noise from its facilities, although the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will increase the District's student capacities. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: Proposed measures to mitigate any such increases described above have been or will be addressed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Stormwater detention and runoff will meet applicable County and/or City requirements and may be subject to National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ("NPDES") permitting requirements. Discharges to air will meet applicable air pollution control requirements. Fuel oil will be stored in accordance with local and state requirements. 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? The Capital Facilities Plan itself will have no impact on these elements of the environment. The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may require clearing plants off of the project sites and a loss to animal habitat. These impacts have been or will be addressed in more detail during project-level SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 21 of 22 environmental review when appropriate. The projects included in the Plan are not likely to generate significant impacts on fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Specific measures to protect and conserve plants, animals, and fish cannot be identified at this time. Specific mitigation proposals will be identified, however, during project-level environmental review when appropriate. 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? The construction of the projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will require the consumption of energy. Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: The projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan will be constructed in accordance with applicable energy efficiency standards. 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? The Capital Facilities Plan and individual projects contained therein should have no impact on these resources. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: Appropriate measures have been or will be proposed during project-level environmental review when appropriate. Updates of this Plan will be coordinated with King County and the cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific as part of the Growth Management Act process, one of the purposes of which is to protect environmentally sensitive areas. To the extent the District's facilities planning process is part of the overall growth management planning process, these resources are more likely to be protected. 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? The Capital Facilities Plan will not have any impact on land or shoreline use that is incompatible with existing comprehensive plans, land use codes, or shoreline management plans. The District does not anticipate that the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein will directly affect land and shoreline uses in the area SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) Form Updated: May 2014 Page 22 of 22 served by the District. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: No measures to avoid or reduce land use impacts resulting from the Capital Facilities Plan or the projects contained therein are proposed at this time. 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? The construction projects included in the Capital Facilities Plan may create temporary increases in the District's need for public services and utilities. The new school facilities will increase the District's demands on transportation and utilities. These increases are not expected to be significant. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: No measures to reduce or respond to such demands are proposed at this time. 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. The Capital Facilities Plan will not conflict with any laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. James P. Fugate Administration Building • 915 Fourth Street NE • Auburn, WA 98002-4499 • 253-931-4900 July 22, 2016 Mr. Jeff Dixon City of Auburn 25 W. Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 Re: Single Family Residence Impact Fee Increase Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2016 to 2022 Dear Mr. Dixon, Auburn School District respectfully requests that the Single Family Residence Impact Fee be increased to $5,469.37 from last year’s fee of $5,330.88. The Multi-Family Residence Impact Fee is proposed to be reduced to $1,639.70 from last year’s fee of $2,625.01. This year’s Impact Fees are calculated using the following formula and amounts: Single Family Multi-Family Site Costs $1,725.09 $549.59 Permanent Facility Const. Costs $15,968.72 $5,087.38 Temporary Facility Costs $ 122.21 $41.57 State Match Credit ($2,768.37) ($881.97) Tax Credit ($3,608.91) ($1,517.18) Fee without Discount $ 11,438.74 $3,279.39 50% Discount ($5,719.37) ($1,639.70) Fee with Discount $6,830.88 $1,639.70 Auburn School District Discount ($250.00) ($0.00) Net Fee Obligation $5,469.37 $1,639.70 The 2015 Single Family Impact Fee decreased by 24% from the previous three year’s Impact Fees due to an unusually low student generation factor caused by three new developments that were generating very few students. The students generated by these three developments have increased over the past two years to a more typical level. Single Family Residence Impact Fee Increase Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2016 to 2022 Page 2 James P. Fugate Administration Building • 915 Fourth Street NE • Auburn, WA 98002-4499 • 253-931-4900 Our Single Family Impact Fees for the past few years have been: 2012 $5,557.30 2013 $5,511.69 2014 $5,398.93 2015 $4,137.21 2016 $5,330.88 2017 (proposed) $5,469.37 The proposed Single Family Impact Fee is $87.93 less than the Impact Fee for 2012. Your consideration and approval of our request will be appreciated. Sincerely, Bob Kenworthy Asst. Director, Capital Projects Cc: C. Blansfield James P. Fugate Administration Building • 915 Fourth Street NE • Auburn, WA 98002-4499 • 253-931-4900 September 29, 2016 Mr. Jeff Dixon City of Auburn 25 W. Main Street Auburn, WA 98001 Re: Single Family Residence Impact Fee Increase Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2016 to 2022 Dear Mr. Dixon, Auburn School District respectfully requests that the Single Family Residence Impact Fee be increased to $5,469.37. The Multi-Family Residence Impact Fee is proposed to be reduced to $1,639.70. This year’s Impact Fees are calculated using the following formula and amounts: Single Family Multi-Family Site Costs $1,725.09 $549.59 Permanent Facility Const. Costs $15,968.72 $5,087.38 Temporary Facility Costs $ 122.21 $ 41.57 State Match Credit ($2,768.37) ($881.97) Tax Credit ($3,608.91) ($1,517.18) Fee without Discount $ 11,438.74 $3,279.39 50% Discount ($5,719.37) ($1,639.70) Fee with Discount $5,719.37 $1,639.70 Auburn School District Discount ($250.00) ($0.00) Net Fee Obligation $5,469.37 $1,639.70 The 2015 Single Family Impact Fee decreased by 24% from the previous three year’s Impact Fees due to an unusually low student generation factor caused by three new developments that were generating very few students. The number of students generated by these three developments has in the past two years increased to a more typical level. Single Family Residence Impact Fee Increase Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan for 2016 to 2022 Page 2 James P. Fugate Administration Building • 915 Fourth Street NE • Auburn, WA 98002-4499 • 253-931-4900 Our Single Family Impact Fees for the past few years have been: 2012 $5,557.30 2013 $5,511.69 2014 $5,398.93 2015 $4,137.21 2016 $5,330.88 2017 (proposed) $5,469.37 The proposed Single Family Impact Fee is $87.93 less than the Impact Fee for 2012. Your consideration and approval of our request will be appreciated. Sincerely, Bob Kenworthy Asst. Director, Capital Projects Cc: C. Blansfield Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 13, 2016 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: Ray Vefik Robyn Mulenga Anne Baunach (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Ryan Van Quill Laurie Bishop Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service……………………Page 8 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 16 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 20 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 23 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 27 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..… Page 31 Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Page 32 Appendix A.2 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 47 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Page 51 Table of Contents Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section I Executive Summary 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2016. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-2 should not exceed 24 students and 18.23 students for our ten schools designated as serving high poverty areas; class size for grades 3-4 should not exceed 26 students; class size for grade 5 should not exceed 29 students. When averaged over the six elementary grades, this computes to 23.8 students per classroom. Class size for grades 6-12 should not exceed 30 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 2015-16 capacity was 14,578. The actual number of individual students was 15,663 as of October 1, 2015. (See Section V for more specific information.) 3 The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and north Auburn valley areas of the district. There are other pockets of development that impact the District as well. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62% and construction for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project began on February 25, 2013. Phases 1 and 2 of the three phase project have been completed and the entire new building area was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015. Site work included in Phase 3 will be completed during the summer of 2016. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past four years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2015 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2016 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections Updated projections. See Appendices A.1 & A.2. Section III Standard of Service A. Reduction of maximum K-2 class size from 20.3 to 18.23 students at 10 elementary schools designated as serving high poverty areas in 2015-16 and from 25 to 24 students at the remaining 4 elementary schools. B. Reduction of maximum third and fourth grade class size from 27 to 26 students. C. Reduction of maximum 5th grade class size from 30 to 29 students. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 1 portable at Alpac Elementary School. B. Add 2 portables at Arthur Jacobsen Elementary School. C. Add 1 portable at Chinook Elementary School. D. Add 2 portables at Pioneer Elementary School. E. Add 2 portables at Terminal Park Elementary School. F. Add 3 portables at Washington Elementary School. G. Add 1 portable at Mt. Baker Middle School. H. Add 1 portable at Auburn Mountainview High School. Section V Pupil Capacity All three of the new portable classrooms placed in January 2016 and five of the ten portables to be placed in June 2016 are needed to accommodate enrollment increase. The remaining five portables to be placed in June 2016 are needed to accommodate facility needs resulting from class size reduction rather than increased enrollment. 4 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2015 to 2016 CPF CPF 2015 2016 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.1960 0.2260 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0730 0.0820 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.0940 0.0940 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.0650 0.0720 over the last five years. Middle School 0.0380 0.0220 Sr. High 0.0220 0.0440 School Construction Costs Elementary $40,880,000 $48,500,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $393,774 $413,463 Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $200.40 $213.23 Updated to projected SPI schedule. (July 2016) Match % - State 63.11% 63.83% Updated to current SPI schedule (May 2016) Match % - District 36.89% 36.17% Computed District Average AV Single Family $255,116 $269,764 Updated from March 2016 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $111,737 $113,408 Updated from March 2016 King County Dept of Assessments data using weighted average. Debt Serv Tax Rate $1.42 $1.59 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 3.68% 3.27% Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections from October 1, 2015 Appendix A.2 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2016 Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey April 2016 DATA ELEMENTS From replacement school cost estimate in May 2016. 5 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS The Auburn School District uses a modified cohort survival model to project future enrollment for all of the District's operations. Table II.1 is an extract from the comprehensive projection model found in Appendix A.2 titled "CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections". This Table shows the anticipated enrollment for the next six years based on the previous six year history of the District under the assumptions set forth in the comprehensive projections, Appendix A.1, and the projection for additional students generated from new developments in the district as shown in Appendix A.2. TABLE ASD ENROLLMENT II.1 PROJECTIONS (April 2016) 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 GRADE Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected KDG 1198 1242 1286 1332 1375 1417 1456 1 1279 1261 1305 1351 1394 1436 1476 2 1289 1309 1291 1336 1380 1422 1461 3 1232 1312 1332 1314 1357 1400 1438 4 1170 1265 1345 1366 1347 1387 1428 5 1172 1193 1288 1369 1388 1367 1407 K - 5 7340 7582 7847 8068 8241 8429 8666 6 1116 1178 1199 1295 1374 1392 1369 7 1099 1142 1205 1227 1321 1398 1414 8 1136 1113 1157 1221 1241 1333 1409 6 - 8 3351 3433 3561 3743 3936 4123 4192 9 1229 1301 1279 1325 1387 1406 1497 10 1316 1241 1313 1292 1336 1397 1413 11 1167 1308 1233 1306 1283 1325 1383 12 1260 1246 1388 1315 1386 1362 1401 9 - 12 4972 5096 5213 5238 5392 5490 5694 TOTALS 15,663 16,111 16,621 17,049 17,569 18,042 18,552 GRADES K-12 Actual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected K-5 7340 7582 7847 8068 8241 8429 8666 6-8 3351 3433 3561 3743 3936 4123 4192 9-12 4972 5096 5213 5238 5392 5490 5694 K-12 15,663 16,111 16,621 17,049 17,569 18,042 18,552 7 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the SPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The SPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the SPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,340 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,351 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 4,972 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 23.8 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 23.8 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 12 the limit is set at 30 pupils per room. The SPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses eleven classrooms to provide for 107 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the SPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses one classroom to provide for seven students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space allocations by one classroom. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.8 each = (24) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (24) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS 9 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Fourteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the SPI space guidelines by seven standard classrooms. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 23.8 each =(167) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(167) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 23.8 each = (24) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (24) HEAD START The Auburn School District operates a Head Start program for approximately 114 pre-school aged children in six sections of 1/2 day in length. The program is housed at three elementary schools and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.8 each =(71) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(71) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 10 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 23.8 each =(238) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(238) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 23.8 each =(95) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(95) 10 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.8 each = (333) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (333) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires fourteen standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.8 each = (333) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (333) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 23.8 each =(190) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(190) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 23.8 each = (333) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (333) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides an Early Childhood Education Assistance Program to meet local needs for disadvantaged students. The State has funded an increase of 24 ECEAP seats. This program will require two new classrooms for 2015-16. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 23.8 each = (71) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 23.8 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss = (71) 11 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eight classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 316 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the SPI space guidelines. ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates five structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities and one developmentally disabled classroom for students with profound disabilities. Two of the five classrooms for this program are provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) MIDDLE SCHOOL COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates a minimum of one computer lab at each of the four middle schools. This program utilizes a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires four standard classrooms that are not provide for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 30 each = (120) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (120) MIDDLE SCHOOLS 12 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. SPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 30 each = (240) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (240) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District operates two computer labs at each of the senior high schools. This program utilizes two standard classrooms at comprehensive high schools and one at West Auburn. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 30 each = (210) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (210) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires three standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 30 each = (90) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (90) ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the SPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 30 each = (30) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (30) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS 13 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates nine structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program requires five standard classrooms that are not provided for in the SPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 30 each = (150) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (150) SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 11 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The SPI space guidelines provide for one of the 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The SPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using SPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 8.33 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8.33 rooms @ 30 each = (250) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 30 each = (300) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 30 each = 0 Total Capacity Loss (300) 14 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 STANDARD OF SERVICE STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,880) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,880) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (630) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (630) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,360) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,360) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (3,870) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (3,870) 15 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 1 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 486 5.40 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 408 6.70 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 477 10.50 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.30 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 440 8.75 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 10.00 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 551 10.00 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 456 8.09 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 497 10.60 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 559 16.40 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 580 12.67 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 585 12.00 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.00 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 829 17.30 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 921 17.40 1825 K Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 26.33 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.88 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.10 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,100 20.50 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 33.00 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 40.00 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,732 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2016) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2016) Elementary Location 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 Washington 5566666 Terminal Park 6777777 Dick Scobee 7777777 Pioneer 7688888 Chinook 6777777 Lea Hill 5666666 Gildo Rey 6677777 Evergreen Heights 4455555 Alpac 6666666 Lake View 2333333 Hazelwood 2344444 Ilalko 6777777 Lakeland Hills Elementary 6777777 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 4456666 TOTAL UNITS 72 78 85 86 86 86 86 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,786 1,934 2,108 2,133 2,133 2,133 2,133 Middle School Location 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 Cascade 0001122 Olympic 0001122 Rainier 5778899 Mt. Baker 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 14 17 17 21 21 24 24 TOTAL CAPACITY 420 510 510 630 630 720 720 Sr. High School Location 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 West Auburn 0001111 Auburn High School 0000000 Auburn High School - *TAP 1111111 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Auburn Mountainview 3445555 TOTAL UNITS 17 18 18 20 20 20 20 TOTAL CAPACITY 510 540 540 600 600 600 600 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 103 113 120 127 127 130 130 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,716 2,984 3,158 3,363 3,363 3,453 3,453 1 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 PUPIL CAPACITY While the Auburn School District uses the SPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new unfunded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (1,154) (886) (712) (507) (507) (417) (417) C. Net Capacity 14,578 14,846 15,020 15,875 16,525 16,615 16,615 D. ASD Enrollment 16,111 16,621 17,049 17,569 18,042 18,552 19,047 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (1,533) (1,775) (2,029) (1,694) (1,517) (1,937) (2,432) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,716 2,984 3,158 3,363 3,363 3,453 3,453 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) Total Adjustments (1,154) (886) (712) (507) (507) (417) (417) Table V.2 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 A. SPI Capacity 15,732 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 B. Capacity Adjustments (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) C. Net Capacity 11,862 11,862 11,862 12,512 13,162 13,162 13,162 D. ASD Enrollment 16,111 16,621 17,049 17,569 18,042 18,552 19,047 3/E. ASD Surplus/Deficit (4,249) (4,759) (5,187) (5,057) (4,880) (5,390) (5,885) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) Total Adjustments (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) (3,870) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 and 2021-22 are not funded under the current Capital Facilities Plan. 2/The Standard of Service represents 24.60% of SPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 22.72% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables 21 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 PUPIL CAPACITY A. Elementary Schools Building 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Washington 486 486 486 486 486 486 486 Terminal Park 408 408 408 408 408 408 408 Dick Scobee 477 477 477 477 477 477 477 Pioneer 441 441 441 441 441 441 441 Chinook 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 Lea Hill 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Gildo Rey 551 551 551 551 551 551 551 Evergreen Heights 456 456 456 456 456 456 456 Alpac 497 497 497 497 497 497 497 Lake View 559 559 559 559 559 559 559 Hazelwood 580 580 580 580 580 580 580 Ilalko 585 585 585 585 585 585 585 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,138 7,138 7,138 7,788 8,438 8,438 8,438 B. Middle Schools Building 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 Cascade 829 829 829 829 829 829 829 Olympic 921 921 921 921 921 921 921 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 3,430 C. Senior High Schools Building 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 2,101 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 5,164 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,732 15,732 15,732 16,382 17,032 17,032 17,032 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2016) 2 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 2 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construction a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 2 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015/16 school year. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 2 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 2,889 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of two new elementary schools and acquiring three new elementary school sites during the six-year window. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population and passage of bond issues and/or capital improvement levies. 2016-22 Capital Construction Plan (May 2016) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 16-17 17-18 18-19 19-20 20-21 21-22 22-23 All Facilities - Technology 2013 Yes $22,000,000 6 Year XX XX XX XX Modernization Cap Levy 1/ Portables Yes $6,000,000 Impact Fees XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 3 New Elementaries No $14,900,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX 1/ Elementary #15 No $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Elementary #16 No $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX plan XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools No $242,500,000 Bond XX Plan XX Plan XX const XX const XX const 1/ Replacement of one Middle School No $78,000,000 Bond XX Plan XX Plan XX const 1/ These funds may be secured through local bond issues, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is currently eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2016)Elementary #15 within 3 year periodElementary #16 within 4 year periodI. SITE COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student FactorSite Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) 12 $413,463 650 0.2260 0.0720 $1,725.09 $549.59Middle Sch (6 - 8) 25 $0 800 0.0820 0.0220 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) 40 $0 1500 0.0940 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$1,725.09 $549.59II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage)Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $48,500,000 650 0.9470 0.2260 0.0720 $15,968.72 $5,087.38Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0 800 0.9470 0.0820 0.0220 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0 1500 0.9470 0.0940 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00$15,968.72 $5,087.38III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCEFormula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio)Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/ Student Generation Factor Cost/ Cost/Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $150,000 23.8 0.0530 0.2260 0.0720 $75.54 $24.07Mid Sch (6 - 8) $150,000 30 0.0530 0.0820 0.0220 $21.74 $5.83Sr High (9 - 12) $150,000 30 0.0530 0.0940 0.0440 $24.93 $11.67 $122.21 $41.57IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor)Boeckh SPI State Cost/ Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi FamilyElem (K - 5) $213.23 90 63.83% 0.2260 0.0720 $2,768.37 $881.96Mid Sch (6 - 8) $0.00 117 63.83% 0.0820 0.0220 $0.00 $0.00Sr High (9 - 12) $0.00 130 63.83% 0.0940 0.0440 $0.00 $0.00 $2,768.37 $881.97Student Generation Factor27 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCEFormula: Expressed as the present value of an annuityTC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi FamilySingle Family $269,764 $1.59 3.27% 10$3,608.91Multi Family $113,408 $1.59 3.27% 10$1,517.18VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDITFormula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility CreditSingle Family $0.001$0.00Multi Family $0.00 1$0.00 FEEPER UNIT IMPACT FEESRECAP Single MultiSUMMARYFamily FamilySite Costs$1,725.09$549.59Permanent Facility Const Costs$15,968.72$5,087.38Temporary Facility Costs$122.21$41.57State Match Credit($2,768.37)($881.97)Tax Credit($3,608.91)($1,517.18)FEE (No Discount)$11,438.74$3,279.39FEE (50% Discount)$5,719.37 $1,639.70Less ASD Discount ($250.00)Facility Credit$0.00$0.00Net Fee Obligation$5,469.37$1,639.702 Auburn School District No. 408CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2016 through 2022 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr HighK - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2016 0.226 0.082 0.094 0.072 0.022 0.044New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2016 $48,500,000 $48,500,000Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service. 23.8 30 30 23.8 30 30Grades K - 5 @ 23.8 and 6 - 12 @ 30.Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40Site Cost/Acre See below $413,463 $413,463 $413,463 $413,463 $413,463 $413,463Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317 1,695,317Temp Sq Footage 103 portables at 896 sq. ft. each + TAP 2661 94,949 94,949 94,949 94,949 94,949 94,949Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,790,266 1,790,266 1,790,266 1,790,266 1,790,266 1,790,266% - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.70% 94.70% 94.70% 94.70% 94.70% 94.70%% - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.30% 5.30% 5.30% 5.30% 5.30% 5.30%SPI Sq Ft/Student From SPI Regulations 90 117 130 90 117 130Boeckh Index From SPI schedule for December 2012 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23 $213.23Match % - State From SPI Webpage December 2012 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83% 63.83%Match % - District Computed 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17% 36.17%Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2015 $269,764 $269,764 $269,764 $113,408 $113,408 $113,408Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $1.59 $1.59 $1.59 $1.59 $1.59 $1.59G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index March 2014) 3.27% 3.27% 3.27% 3.27% 3.27% 3.27%Site Cost ProjectionsRecent PropertyPurchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date ProjectedAcquisitions AcreageYearPriceCost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/AcreLakeland 12.002002$2,701,043 $225,087 $445,657 5.00% Elementary 2017 $434,136Labrador35.002008$7,601,799 $217,194 $320,895 5.00% Elementary 2018 $455,843Lakeland East 27.002009$9,092,160 $336,747 $473,836 5.00% Elementary 2022 $554,079Total74.00$19,395,002 $262,095 $413,463 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2016 through 2022 Section VIII Appendix Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.3 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.1 - Student Enrollment Projections 1 Auburn School District #408 Student Enrollment Projections October 2015 Introduction The projective techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, the ‘projector’ must make certain assumptions about the operant variables within the data being used. These assumptions are “judgmental” by definition. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future, or from the known to the unknown. The attached tabular data reviews the history of student enrollment, sets out some quantitative assumptions, and provides projections based on these numerical factors. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today, and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over thirteen years and six years respectively. The results provide a trend, which reflects a long (13-year) and a short (6-year) base from which to extrapolate. Two methods of estimating the number of kindergarten students have been used. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13 and 6-year time frame and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn kindergartners have been of live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and credibility of the projections derived by these techniques. Tables Table 1 – Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments – page 3 The data shown in this table is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. This data shows the past record of enrollment in the district on October 1 of each year. Table 2 – Historical Factors Used in Projections - page 4 This table shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table 1. These factors have been used in the subsequent projections. The three factors are:  Factor 1 – Average Pupil Change Between Grade Levels This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of pupils gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next.  Factor 2 - Average Pupil Change by Grade Level This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13 or 6-year period.  Factor 3 – Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollment as a Function of King County Live Births. This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. From this information has been extrapolated the kindergarten pupils expected for the next four years. 2 Table 3 – Projection Models – pages 5-13 This set of tables utilizes the above mentioned variables and generates several projections. The models are explained briefly below.  Table 3.13 (pg 5) – shows a projection based on the 13-year average gain in kindergarten (Factor 2) and the 13-year average change between grade levels (Factor 1). The data is shown for the district as a whole.  Table 3.6 (pg 5) – shows a projection using the same scheme as Table 3.13 except it shortens the historical data to only the most recent 6 years.  Table 3.13A and 3.6A (pg 6) – uses the same factors above except Factor 3 is substituted for Factor 2. The kindergarten rates are derived from the King County live births instead of the average gain.  Tables 3E.13, 3E.6, 3E.13A, 3E.6A (pg 7) – breaks out the K-5 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3MS.13, 3MS.6, 3MS.13A, 3MS.6A (pg 8) – breaks out the 6-8 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Tables 3SH.13, 3SH.6, 3SH.13A, 3SH.6A (pg 9) – breaks out the 9-12 grades from the district projection. Summary level data is provided for percentage gain and pupil gain by grade articulation.  Table 4 (pg 10) – Collects the four projection models by grade group for ease of comparison.  Table 5 (pgs 11-13) – shows how well each projection model performed when compared with actual enrollments. Data is provided in both number and percent formats for the past 13 years. Summary This year is the fourth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment after three consecutive years of declining enrollment. The increase of 386 students changes our historical average gain/loss in students. Over the past 6 years the average gain is now 1.20% annually, which equates to an average annual gain of 179 students. Using the cohort survival models, the data below is a summary of the range of variation between the four models. This data can be used for planning for future needs of the district. The models show changes in the next six years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 780 to 1,133. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 747 to 750. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 579 to 628. (page 9) The models show these changes looking forward thirteen years:  Elementary level show increases ranging from 1,746 to 2,712. (page 7)  Middle School level show increases ranging from 1,112 to 1,388. (page 8)  High School level show increases ranging from 1,007 to 1,556. (page 9) This data does not factor new developments that are currently under construction or in the planning stages. AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE Thirteen Year History of October 1 Enrollments(Rev 10/15)1ActualGRADE 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-1515-16KDG 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 11981 982 960 963 1012 995 1015 1033 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 12792 909 992 963 1002 1019 1024 998 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 12893 996 918 1002 1031 997 1048 993 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 12324 947 1016 939 1049 1057 1044 1073 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 11705 1018 957 1065 998 1078 1069 1030 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 11726 1111 1020 1004 1058 1007 1096 1040 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 11167 1131 1124 1028 1014 1057 1034 1125 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 10998 1052 1130 1137 1072 1033 1076 1031 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 11369 1473 1461 1379 1372 1337 1256 1244 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 122910 1249 1261 1383 1400 1368 1341 1277 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 131611 1010 1055 1182 1322 1352 1350 1303 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 116712 902 886 1088 1147 1263 1352 1410 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260TOTALS 13,702 13,672 14,088 14,418 14,559 14,703 14,589 14,482 14,363 14,596 14,971 15,27715,663Percent of Gain (0.22)%3.04%2.34% 0.98% 0.99% (0.78)%(0.73)% (0.82)% 1.62%2.57% 2.04% 2.53%Pupil Gain(30)416 330 141 144(114) (107) (119)233 375 306 386Average % Gain for 1st 6 years. 1.06% Average % Gain for last 6 years 1.20%Average Pupil Gain for 1st 6 years. 148 Average Pupil Gain for last 6 years 179Average % Gain for 13 years. 1.13%Average Pupil Gain for 13 years. 163TABLE1A Grade Group CombinationsKDG 922 892 955 941 996 998 1032 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198K,1,2 2813 2844 2881 2955 3010 3037 3063 3092 3194 3270 3482 3647 3766K - 5 5774 5735 5887 6033 6142 6198 6159 6208 6230 6489 6805 7061 7340K - 6 6885 6755 6891 7091 7149 7294 7199 7249 7293 7530 7881 8120 84561 - 3 2887 2870 2928 3045 3011 3087 3024 3095 3161 3283 3437 3551 38001 - 5 4852 4843 4932 5092 5146 5200 5127 5198 5201 5391 5635 5829 61421 - 6 5963 5863 5936 6150 6153 6296 6167 6239 6264 6432 6711 6888 72586 - 8 3294 3274 3169 3144 3097 3206 3196 3213 3141 3144 3264 3238 33517 - 8 2183 2254 2165 2086 2090 2110 2156 2172 2078 2103 2188 2179 22357 - 9 3656 3715 3544 3458 3427 3366 3400 3393 3351 3303 3347 3454 34649 - 12 4634 4663 5032 5241 5320 5299 5234 5061 4992 4963 4902 4978 497210 - 12 3161 3202 3653 3869 3983 4043 3990 3840 3719 3763 3743 3703 3743Page 3 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE Factors Used in ProjectionsFactorAUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN ENROLLMENTS23 AS FUNCTION OF KING COUNTY LIVE BIRTH RATESCAL- TOTAL YEAR ADJUSTED AUBURN KINDERGARTENFactor Average Pupil Change Between GradeENDAR LIVE 2/3rds 1/3rds OF LIVE KDG ENROLLMENT AS A % OF1 LevelsYEAR BIRTHS BIRTHS BIRTHS ENROLL BIRTHS ENROLL. ADJUSTED LIVE BIRTHS13 YEAR BASE6 YEAR BASE1975 13,5409,027 4,513 81/82 13,687 5884.296%K to 1 51.00K to 1 56.331976 13,761 9,174 4,587 82/83 14,375 6984.856%1 to 2 17.751 to 2 23.671977 14,682 9,788 4,894 83/84 14,958 6664.452%2 to 3 14.922 to 3 16.501978 15,096 10,064 5,032 84/85 16,048 7264.524%3 to 4 28.753 to 4 26.501979 16,524 11,016 5,508 85/86 16,708 7924.740%4 to 5 20.424 to 5 16.671980 16,800 11,200 5,600 86/87 17,000 8294.876%5 to 6 3.505 to 6 0.331981 17,100 11,400 5,700 87/88 18,241 7694.216%6 to 7 17.176 to 7 20.001982 18,811 12,541 6,270 88/89 18,626 8174.386%7 to 8 11.677 to 8 8.171983 18,533 12,355 6,178 89/90 18,827 8714.626%8 to 9 208.008 to 9 157.831984 18,974 12,649 6,325 90/91 19,510 8584.398%9 to 10(18.33)9 to 10 4.671985 19,778 13,185 6,593 91/92 19,893 9094.569%10 to 11(43.83)10 to 11(14.67)1986 19,951 13,301 6,650 92/93 21,852 9204.210%11 to 12 25.3311 to 12 71.501987 22,803 15,202 7,601 93/94 21,624 9304.301%total 336.33total 387.501988 21,034 14,023 7,011 94/95 24,062 9273.853%Factor 1 is the average gain or loss of pupils as they1989 25,576 17,051 8,525 95/96 26,358 9543.619%move from one grade level to the next. Factor 1 uses1990 26,749 17,833 8,916 96/97 24,116 9633.993%the past (12) OR (5) years of changes.1991 22,799 15,199 7,600 97/98 20,973 9784.663%1992 20,060 13,373 6,687 98/99 21,573 8543.959%Factor Average Pupil Change By Grade Level1993 22,330 14,887 7,443 99/00 22,129 8493.837%21994 22,029 14,686 7,343 00/01 24,013 9123.798% 13 YEAR BASE6 YEAR BASE1995 25,005 16,670 8,335 01/02 22,717 8463.724%K 23.00K 37.601996 21,573 14,382 7,191 02/03 21,622 9054.186%1 24.751 42.601997 21,646 14,431 7,215 03/04 22,023 9224.186%2 31.672 54.601998 22,212 14,808 7,404 04/05 22,075 8924.041%3 19.673 43.801999 22,007 14,671 7,336 05/06 22,327 9554.277%4 18.584 29.202000 22,487 14,991 7,496 06/07 22,014 9414.274%5 12.835 18.602001 21,778 14,519 7,259 07/08 21,835 9964.562%6 0.426 15.002002 21,863 14,575 7,288 08/09 22,242 9984.487%7(2.67)7 7.802003 22,431 14,954 7,477 09/10 22,726 10324.541%8 7.008 4.802004 22,874 15,249 7,625 10/11 22,745 10104.441%9(20.33)9 1.602005 22,680 15,120 7,560 11/12 23,723 10294.338%10 5.5810 15.602006 24,244 16,163 8,081 12/13 24,683 10984.448%Last 511 13.0811(18.20)2007 24,902 16,601 8,301 13/14 25,094 11624.631%year12 29.8312(16.80)2008 25,190 16,793 8,397 14/15 25,101 12324.908%AverageFactor 2 is the average change in grade level size2009 25,057 16,705 8,352 15/16 24,6951198 Actual4.851%4.635%from 01/02 OR 08/09.2010 24,514 16,343 8,171 16/17 24,5911140<--Prjctd year2011 24,630 16,420 8,210 17/18 24,8981154<--Prjctd year2012 25,032 16,688 8,344 18/19 24,9511157<--Prjctd year2013 24,910 16,607 8,303 19/20 25,2021168<--Prjctd2014 25,348 16,899 8,449 20/21* number from DOHSource: Center for Health Statistics, Washington State Department of HealthPage 4 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015Contact Todd Rime - todd.rime@doh.wa.gov 360-236-4323TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1221 1244 1267 1290 1313 1336 1359 1382 1405 1428 1451 1474 14971 1279 1249 1272 1295 1318 1341 1364 1387 1410 1433 1456 1479 1502 15252 1289 1297 1267 1290 1313 1336 1359 1382 1405 1428 1451 1474 1497 15203 1232 1304 1312 1282 1305 1328 1351 1374 1397 1420 1443 1466 1489 15124 1170 1261 1333 1340 1310 1333 1356 1379 1402 1425 1448 1471 1494 15175 1172 1190 1281 1353 1361 1331 1354 1377 1400 1423 1446 1469 1492 15156 1116 1176 1194 1285 1357 1364 1334 1357 1380 1403 1426 1449 1472 14957 1099 1133 1193 1211 1302 1374 1382 1352 1375 1398 1421 1444 1467 14908 1136 1111 1145 1204 1223 1314 1385 1393 1363 1386 1409 1432 1455 14789 1229 1344 1319 1353 1412 1431 1522 1593 1601 1571 1594 1617 1640 166310 1316 1211 1326 1300 1335 1394 1412 1503 1575 1583 1553 1576 1599 162211 1167 1272 1167 1282 1257 1291 1350 1369 1459 1531 1539 1509 1532 155512 1260 1192 1298 1192 1307 1282 1316 1376 1394 1485 1557 1564 1534 1557TOTALS 15,663 15,960 16,348 16,654 17,088 17,431 17,821 18,200 18,543 18,891 19,170 19,401 19,647 19,946Percent of Gain 1.90% 2.43% 1.87% 2.61% 2.00% 2.24% 2.13% 1.88% 1.87% 1.48% 1.20% 1.27% 1.52%Pupil Gain 297 388 306 434 342 391 379 343 347 280 231 246 299TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1236 1273 1311 1348 1386 1424 1461 1499 1536 1574 1612 1649 16871 1279 1254 1292 1330 1367 1405 1442 1480 1518 1555 1593 1630 1668 17062 1289 1303 1278 1316 1353 1391 1428 1466 1504 1541 1579 1616 1654 16923 1232 1306 1319 1295 1332 1370 1407 1445 1483 1520 1558 1595 1633 16714 1170 1259 1332 1346 1321 1359 1396 1434 1471 1509 1547 1584 1622 16595 1172 1187 1275 1349 1362 1338 1375 1413 1450 1488 1526 1563 1601 16386 1116 1172 1187 1276 1349 1363 1338 1376 1413 1451 1488 1526 1564 16017 1099 1136 1192 1207 1296 1369 1383 1358 1396 1433 1471 1508 1546 15848 1136 1107 1144 1201 1215 1304 1377 1391 1366 1404 1441 1479 1517 15549 1229 1294 1265 1302 1358 1373 1462 1535 1549 1524 1562 1599 1637 167410 1316 1234 1299 1270 1307 1363 1378 1466 1540 1553 1529 1566 1604 164111 1167 1301 1219 1284 1255 1292 1348 1363 1452 1525 1539 1514 1552 158912 1260 1239 1373 1291 1355 1327 1364 1420 1435 1523 1597 1610 1586 1623TOTALS 15,663 16,026 16,448 16,774 17,219 17,637 18,122 18,607 19,074 19,563 20,002 20,404 20,831 21,319Percent of Gain 2.32% 2.63% 1.98% 2.66% 2.43% 2.75% 2.68% 2.51% 2.57% 2.24% 2.01% 2.09% 2.35%Pupil Gain 363 422 325 445 418 485 485 466 489 439 403 427 489Page 5 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29K 1198 1140 1154 1157 1168 1 1279 1249 1191 1205 1208 1219 2 1289 1297 1267 1209 1223 1225 1237 3 1232 1304 1312 1282 1224 1238 1240 12524 1170 1261 1333 1340 1310 1252 1266 1269 12815 1172 1190 1281 1353 1361 1331 1273 1287 1289 13016 1116 1176 1194 1285 1357 1364 1334 1276 1290 1293 13047 1099 1133 1193 1211 1302 1374 1382 1352 1293 1308 1310 13228 1136 1111 1145 1204 1223 1314 1385 1393 1363 1305 1319 1322 13339 1229 1344 1319 1353 1412 1431 1522 1593 1601 1571 1513 1527 1530 154110 1316 1211 1326 1300 1335 1394 1412 1503 1575 1583 1553 1495 1509 151111 1167 1272 1167 1282 1257 1291 1350 1369 1459 1531 1539 1509 1451 146512 1260 1192 1298 1192 1307 1282 1316 1376 1394 1485 1557 1564 1534 1476TOTALS 15,663 15,879 16,177 16,373 16,685Percent of Gain 1.38% 1.88% 1.21% 1.91%Pupil Gain 216 298 195 312TABLE DISTRICT PROJECTIONS3.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1140 1154 1157 1168 1 1279 1254 1196 1210 1213 12242 1289 1303 1278 1220 1234 1237 12483 1232 1306 1319 1295 1236 1251 1253 12654 1170 1259 1332 1346 1321 1263 1277 1280 12915 1172 1187 1275 1349 1362 1338 1280 1294 1296 13086 1116 1172 1187 1276 1349 1363 1338 1280 1294 1297 13087 1099 1136 1192 1207 1296 1369 1383 1358 1300 1314 1317 13288 1136 1107 1144 1201 1215 1304 1377 1391 1366 1308 1322 1325 13369 1229 1294 1265 1302 1358 1373 1462 1535 1549 1524 1466 1480 1483 149410 1316 1234 1299 1270 1307 1363 1378 1466 1540 1553 1529 1471 1485 148711 1167 1301 1219 1284 1255 1292 1348 1363 1452 1525 1539 1514 1456 147012 1260 1239 1373 1291 1355 1327 1364 1420 1435 1523 1597 1610 1586 1527TOTALS 15,663 15,930 16,233 16,405 16,670Percent of Gain 1.71% 1.90% 1.05% 1.62%Pupil Gain 267 303 171 265Page 6 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13 Based on 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1221 1244 1267 1290 1313 1336 1359 1382 1405 1428 1451 1474 14971 1279 1249 1272 1295 1318 1341 1364 1387 1410 1433 1456 1479 1502 15252 1289 1297 1267 1290 1313 1336 1359 1382 1405 1428 1451 1474 1497 15203123213041312128213051328135113741397142014431466148915124117012611333134013101333135613791402142514481471149415175 1172 1190 1281 1353 1361 1331 1354 1377 1400 1423 1446 1469 1492 1515 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7340 7522 7708 7827 7897 7982 8120 8258 8396 8534 8672 8810 8948 9086 780 1746Percent of Gain 2.48% 2.48% 1.54% 0.89% 1.08% 1.73% 1.70% 1.67% 1.64% 1.62% 1.59% 1.57% 1.54%Pupil Gain 182 186 119 70 85 138 138 138 138 138 138 138 138TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6 Based on 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1236 1273 1311 1348 1386 1424 1461 1499 1536 1574 1612 1649 16871 1279 1254 1292 1330 1367 1405 1442 1480 1518 1555 1593 1630 1668 17062 1289 1303 1278 1316 1353 1391 1428 1466 1504 1541 1579 1616 1654 16923 1232 1306 1319 1295 1332 1370 1407 1445 1483 1520 1558 1595 1633 16714117012591332134613211359139614341471150915471584162216595 1172 1187 1275 1349 1362 1338 1375 1413 1450 1488 1526 1563 1601 1638 6 year 13 yearK - 5 TOT 7340 7543 7769 7945 8084 8248 8473 8699 8924 9150 9376 9601 9827 10052 1133 2712Percent of Gain 2.77% 3.00% 2.26% 1.75% 2.02% 2.74% 2.66% 2.59% 2.53% 2.47% 2.41% 2.35% 2.30%Pupil Gain 203 226 175 139 163 226 226 226 226 226 226 226 226TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29K 1198 1140 1154 1157 11681 1279 1249 1191 1205 1208 12192 1289 1297 1267 1209 1223 1225 12373 1232 1304 1312 1282 1224 1238 1240 125241170126113331340131012521266126912815 1172 1190 1281 1353 1361 1331 1273 1287 1289 13014 yearK - 5 TOT 7340 7441 7537 7545 7493153Percent of Gain 1.37% 1.30% 0.11% (0.69)%Pupil Gain 101 96 8(52)TABLE K - 5 PROJECTIONS3E.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29KDG 1198 1140 1154 1157 11681 1279 1254 1196 1210 1213 12242 1289 1303 1278 1220 1234 1237 12483 1232 1306 1319 1295 1236 1251 1253 126541170125913321346132112631277128012915 1172 1187 1275 1349 1362 1338 1280 1294 1296 13084 yearK - 5 TOT 7340 7448 7555 7576 7535195Percent of Gain 1.46% 1.44% 0.28% (0.54)%Pupil Gain 108 107 21 (41)Page 7 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-296 1116 1176 1194 1285 1357 1364 1334 1357 1380 1403 1426 1449 1472 14957 1099 1133 1193 1211 1302 1374 1382 1352 1375 1398 1421 1444 1467 14908 1136 1111 1145 1204 1223 1314 1385 1393 1363 1386 1409 1432 1455 1478 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3351 3419 3531 3700 3881 4052 4101 4102 4118 4187 4256 4325 4394 4463 750 1112Percent of Gain 2.04% 3.28% 4.78% 4.89% 4.39% 1.23% 0.02% 0.39% 1.68% 1.65% 1.62% 1.60% 1.57%Pupil Gain 68 112 169 181 170 50 1 16 69 69 69 69 69TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-296 1116 1172 1187 1276 1349 1363 1338 1376 1413 1451 1488 1526 1564 16017 1099 1136 1192 1207 1296 1369 1383 1358 1396 1433 1471 1508 1546 15848 1136 1107 1144 1201 1215 1304 1377 1391 1366 1404 1441 1479 1517 1554 6 year 13 year6 - 8 TOT 3351 3416 3524 3683 3860 4035 4098 4124 4175 4288 4401 4513 4626 4739 747 1388Percent of Gain 1.92% 3.16% 4.53% 4.80% 4.55% 1.55% .65% 1.23% 2.70% 2.63% 2.56% 2.50% 2.44%Pupil Gain 65 108 160 177 176 63 27 51 113 113 113 113 113TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-296 1116 1176 1194 1285 1357 1364 1334 1276 1290 1293 13047 1099 1133 1193 1211 1302 1374 1382 1352 1293 1308 1310 13228 1136 1111 1145 1204 1223 1314 1385 1393 1363 1305 1319 1322 13336 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3351 3419 3531 3700 3881 4052 4101 4021 3947 3905 3934750 583Percent of Gain 2.04% 3.28% 4.78% 4.89% 4.39% 1.23%(1.96)% (1.84)% (1.05)%0.72%Pupil Gain 68 112 169 181 170 50(80) (74) (41)28TABLE MIDDLE SCHOOL PROJECTIONS 3MS.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-296 1116 1172 1187 1276 1349 1363 1338 1280 1294 1297 13087 1099 1136 1192 1207 1296 1369 1383 1358 1300 1314 1317 13288 1136 1107 1144 1201 1215 1304 1377 1391 1366 1308 1322 1325 13366 year 10 year6 - 8 TOT 3351 3416 3524 3683 3860 4035 4098 4029 3960 3919 3947747 596Percent of Gain 1.92% 3.16% 4.53% 4.80% 4.55% 1.55%(1.69)% (1.70)% (1.05)%0.72%Pupil Gain 65 108 160 177 176 63(69) (69) (41)28Page 8 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13 Based on 13 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-299 1229 1344 1319 1353 1412 1431 1522 1593 1601 1571 1594 1617 1640 166310 1316 1211 1326 1300 1335 1394 1412 1503 1575 1583 1553 1576 1599 162211 1167 1272 1167 1282 1257 1291 1350 1369 1459 1531 1539 1509 1532 155512 1260 1192 1298 1192 1307 1282 1316 1376 1394 1485 1557 1564 1534 1557 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 4972 5019 5109 5127 5311 5397 5600 5841 6030 6170 6243 6266 6305 6397 628 1425Percent of Gain0.95%1.78% 0.36% 3.58% 1.63% 3.76% 4.30% 3.23% 2.33% 1.18% 0.38% 0.62% 1.46%Pupil Gain 47 90 19 183 87 203 241 189 140 73 24 39 92TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6 Based on 6 Year History ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-299 1229 1294 1265 1302 1358 1373 1462 1535 1549 1524 1562 1599 1637 167410 1316 1234 1299 1270 1307 1363 1378 1466 1540 1553 1529 1566 1604 164111 1167 1301 1219 1284 1255 1292 1348 1363 1452 1525 1539 1514 1552 158912 1260 1239 1373 1291 1355 1327 1364 1420 1435 1523 1597 1610 1586 1623 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 4972 5067 5155 5146 5275 5355 5551 5784 5974 6125 6225 6290 6378 6528 579 1556Percent of Gain1.92%1.74% (0.18)% 2.51% 1.50% 3.67% 4.20% 3.29% 2.53% 1.63% 1.03% 1.40% 2.36%Pupil Gain 95 88(9)129 79 197 233 190 151 100 64 88 150TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.13A Based on Birth Rates & 13 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-299 1229 1344 1319 1353 1412 1431 1522 1593 1601 1571 1513 1527 1530 154110 1316 1211 1326 1300 1335 1394 1412 1503 1575 1583 1553 1495 1509 151111 1167 1272 1167 1282 1257 1291 1350 1369 1459 1531 1539 1509 1451 146512 1260 1192 1298 1192 1307 1282 1316 1376 1394 1485 1557 1564 1534 1476 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 4972 5019 5109 5127 5311 5397 5600 5841 6030 6170 6161 6095 6024 5994 628 1022Percent of Gain0.95%1.78% 0.36% 3.58% 1.63% 3.76% 4.30% 3.23% 2.33% (0.14)%(1.07)% (1.17)% (0.50)%Pupil Gain 47 90 19 183 87 203 241 189 140(8) (66) (71) (30)TABLE SR. HIGH PROJECTIONS 3SH.6A Based on Birth Rates & 6 Year HistoryACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-299 1229 1294 1265 1302 1358 1373 1462 1535 1549 1524 1466 1480 1483 149410 1316 1234 1299 1270 1307 1363 1378 1466 1540 1553 1529 1471 1485 148711 1167 1301 1219 1284 1255 1292 1348 1363 1452 1525 1539 1514 1456 147012 1260 1239 1373 1291 1355 1327 1364 1420 1435 1523 1597 1610 1586 1527 6 year 13 year9-12 TOT 4972 5067 5155 5146 5275 5355 5551 5784 5974 6125 6130 6075 6009 5979 579 1007Percent of Gain1.92%1.74% (0.18)% 2.51% 1.50% 3.67% 4.20% 3.29% 2.53% 0.07%(0.90)% (1.09)% (0.50)%Pupil Gain 95 88(9)129 79 197 233 190 151 4(55) (66) (30)Page 9 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE PROJECTION COMPARISONS4 BY GRADE GROUPKINDERGARTENACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 6 year 13 yearE.13 1198 1221 1244 1267 1290 1313 1336 1359 1382 1405 1428 1451 1474 1497 138 299E.6 1198 1236 1273 1311 1348 1386 1424 1461 1499 1536 1574 1612 1649 1687 226 489E.13A 1198 1140 1154 1157 1168E.6A 1198 1140 1154 1157 1168GRD 1 -- GRD 5ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 6 year 13 yearE.13 6142 6301 6464 6560 6607 6669 6784 6899 7014 7129 7244 7359 7474 7589 642 1447E.6 6142 6308 6496 6634 6736 6862 7050 7238 7426 7614 7802 7990 8178 8365 907 2223E.13A 6142 6301 6383 6389 6325E.6A 6142 6308 6401 6419 6367GRD 6 -- GRD 8ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 6 year 13 yearMS.13 3351 3419 3531 3700 3881 4052 4101 4102 4118 4187 4256 4325 4394 4463 750 1112MS.6 3351 3416 3524 3683 3860 4035 4098 4124 4175 4288 4401 4513 4626 4739 747 1388MS.13A 3351 3419 3531 3700 3881 4052 4101 4021 3947 3905 3934750MS.6A 3351 3416 3524 3683 3860 4035 4098 4029 3960 3919 3947747GRD 9 -- GRD 12ACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 6 year 13 yearSH.13 4972 5019 5109 5127 5311 5397 5600 5841 6030 6170 6243 6266 6305 6397 628 1425SH.6 4972 5067 5155 5146 5275 5355 5551 5784 5974 6125 6225 6290 6378 6528 579 1556SH.13A 4972 5019 5109 5127 5311 5397 5600 5841 6030 6170 6161 6095 6024 5994 628 1022SH.6A 4972 5067 5155 5146 5275 5355 5551 5784 5974 6125 6130 6075 6009 5979 579 1007DISTRICT TOTALSACTUAL PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJ PROJGRADE 15/16 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 27-28 28-29 6 year 13 year3.13 15,663 15,960 16,348 16,654 17,088 17,431 17,821 18,200 18,543 18,891 19,170 19,401 19,647 19,946 2158 42833.6 15,663 16,026 16,448 16,774 17,219 17,637 18,122 18,607 19,074 19,563 20,002 20,404 20,831 21,319 2459 56563.13A 15,663 15,879 16,177 16,373 16,6853.6A 15,663 15,930 16,233 16,405 16,670Page 10 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5774 xxx xxx 5735 xxx xxx 5887 xxx xxx 6033 xxx xxx 6142 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5723(51) (0.88)%5655(80) (1.39)%5761(126)(2.14)% 5750(283) (4.69)%5871(271) (4.41)%Prj 3E.6 5735(39) (0.68)%5662(73) (1.27)%5821(66)(1.12)% 5795(238) (3.94)%5921(221) (3.60)%Prj 3E.13A 5743(31)(0.54)% 5605(130) (2.27)%5709(178) (3.02)%5750(283) (4.69)%5869(273) (4.44)%Prj 3E.6A 5776 2 0.03% 5631(104) (1.81)%5756(131)(2.23)% 5784(249) (4.13)%5912(230) (3.74)%Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3294 xxx xxx 3274 xxx xxx 3169 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxx 3097 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3025(269) (8.17)%3185(80) (2.72)%3214 451.42%3295 151 4.80% 3131 341.10%Prj 3E.6 3011(283) (8.59)%3192(75) (2.50)%3216 471.48%3311 167 5.31% 3146 49 1.58%Prj 3E.13A 3025(269) (8.17)%3185(80) (2.72)%3214 451.42%3295 151 4.80% 3131 341.10%Prj 3E.6A 3011(283) (8.59)%3192(75) (2.50)%3216 471.48%3311 167 5.31% 3146 49 1.58%Grades 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 4634 xxx xxx 4663 xxx xxx 5032 xxx xxx 5241 xxx xxx 5320 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4455(179) (3.86)%4577(86) (1.84)%4630(402) (7.99)%4783(458) (8.74)%5085(235) (4.42)%Prj 3E.6 4476(158) (3.41)%4594(69) (1.48)%4639(393) (7.81)%4769(472) (9.01)%5086(234) (4.40)%Prj 3E.13A 4455(179) (3.86)%4577(86) (1.84)%4630(402) (7.99)%4783(458) (8.74)%5085(235) (4.42)%Prj 3E.6A 4476(158) (3.41)%4594(69) (1.48)%4639(393) (7.81)%4769(472) (9.01)%5086(234) (4.40)%All2003-042004-052005-062006-072007-08Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 13,702 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,088 xxx xxx 14,418 xxx xxx 14,559 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 13,203(499) (3.64)%13,417(255) (1.87)%13,605(483) (3.43)%13,828(590) (4.09)%14,087(472) (3.24)%Prj 3E.6 13,222(480) (3.50)%13,448(224) (1.64)%13,676(412)(2.92)% 13,875(543) (3.77)%14,153(406) (2.79)%Prj 3E.13A 13,223(479) (3.50)%13,367(305) (2.23)%13,553(535) (3.80)%13,828(590) (4.09)%14,085(474) (3.26)%Prj 3E.6A 13,263(439) (3.20)%13,417(255) (1.87)%13,611(477) (3.39)%13,864(554) (3.84)%14,144(415) (2.85)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUPPage 11 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over ActualPrj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades2008-092009-102010-112011-122012-13K - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 6198 xxx xxx 6159 xxx xxx 6208 xxx xxx 6230 xxx xxx 6489 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 6085(113) (1.82)%6179 200.32%6254 46 0.74% 6282 52 0.83% 6275 (214) (3.30)%Prj 3E.6 6138(60) (0.97)%6237 78 1.27% 6294 86 1.39% 6323 93 1.49% 6267 (222) (3.42)%Prj 3E.13A 6059(139) (2.24)%6129(30) (0.49)%6237 29 0.47% 6252 22 0.35% 6266 (223) (3.44)%Prj 3E.6A 6094(104) (1.68)%6172 130.21%6264 56 0.90% 6269 39 0.63% 6260 (229) (3.53)%Grades2008-092009-102003-042011-122012-13 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 3206 xxx xxx 3196 xxx xxx 3213 xxx xxx 3141 xxx xxx 3144 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3107(99)(3.09)% 3179(17) (0.53)%3242 29 0.90% 3234 93 2.96% 3221 77 2.45%Prj 3E.6 3116(90)(2.81)% 3195(1) (0.03)%3243 30 0.93% 3236 95 3.02% 3211 67 2.13%Prj 3E.13A 3107(99)(3.09)% 3179(17) (0.53)%3242 29 0.90% 3234 93 2.96% 3221 77 2.45%Prj 3E.6A 3116(90)(2.81)% 3195(1) (0.03)%3243 30 0.93% 3236 95 3.02% 3211 67 2.13%Grades2008-092009-102003-042011-122012-13 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 5299 xxx xxx 5234 xxx xxx 5061 xxx xxx 4992 xxx xxx 4963 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 5190(109) (2.06)%5129(105) (2.01)%5074 130.26%4921(71) (1.42)%4901(62) (1.25)%Prj 3E.6 5192(107) (2.02)%5155(79) (1.51)%5128 671.32%5027 350.70%5017 54 1.09%Prj 3E.13A 5190(109) (2.06)%5129(105) (2.01)%5074 130.26%4921(71) (1.42)%4901(62) (1.25)%Prj 3E.6A 5192(107) (2.02)%5155(79) (1.51)%5129 681.34%5027 350.70%5017 54 1.09%All2008-092009-102003-042011-122012-13Grades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff %ACTUAL 14,703 xxx xxx 14,589 xxx xxx 13,672 xxx xxx 14,363 xxx xxx 14,596 xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 14,382(321) (2.18)%13,499(173) (7.47)%14,570 898 6.57% 14,437 740.52%14,397(199)(1.36)%Prj 3E.6 14,446(257) (1.75)%13,542(130)(7.18)%14,665 993 7.26% 14,586 223 1.55% 14,495(101)(0.69)%Prj 3E.13A 14,356(347) (2.36)%13,447(225) (7.83)%14,553 881 6.44% 14,407 440.31%14,388(208)(1.43)%Prj 3E.6A 14,402(301) (2.05)%13,510(162) (7.40)%14,636 964 7.05% 14,532 169 1.18% 14,488(108)(0.74)%BY GRADE GROUP (Continued)PROJECTION COMPARISONSPage 12 October 2015 AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT STUDENT ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS - October 2015TABLE5Total = October 1 Actual Count AND Projected Counts Prj 3.13 - 13 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg IncreaseDiff = Number Projection is under(-) or over ActualPrj 3.6 - 6 YEAR HISTORY & Using Average Kdg Increase % = Percent Projection is under(-) or over Actual Prj 3.13A 13 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesPrj 3.6A - 6 YEAR HISTORY & King Cty Birth RatesGrades2013-142014-152015-16Average Average Historical Data is grouped byK - 5 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff % K - 5, 6-8, 9-12 articulationACTUAL 6805 xxx xxx 7061 xxxxxx7340 xxx xxx xxx xxxpattern.Prj 3E.13 6372(433) (6.36)%6659(402) (5.69)%7052(288) (3.92)% (132) (2.52)%Prj 3E.6 6368(437) (6.42)%6632(429) (6.08)%7046(294) (4.01)% (107) (2.10)%Articulation pattern has noPrj 3E.13A 6346(459) (6.75)%6643(418) (5.92)%6979(361) (4.92)% (155) (2.91)%numeric impact on efficacyPrj 3E.6A 6339(466) (6.85)%6611(450) (6.37)%6966(374) (5.10)% (135) (2.59)%of projection models.Grades2013-142014-152015-16Average Average 6 - 8 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 3264 xxx xxx 3238 xxx xxx 3351 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 3143(121) (3.71)%3230(8) (0.25)%3256(95)(2.83)%(11) (0.59)%Prj 3E.6 3132(132) (4.04)%3213(25) (0.77)%3246(105)(3.13)%(10) (0.57)%Prj 3E.13A 3143(121) (3.71)%3230(8) (0.25)%3256(95)(2.83)%(11) (0.59)%Prj 3E.6A 3132(132) (4.04)%3213(25) (0.77)%3246(105)(3.13)%(10) (0.57)%Grades2013-142014-152015-16Average Average 9 - 12 Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 4902 xxx xxx 4978 xxx xxx 4972 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 4813(89) (1.82)%4773(205) (4.12)%4874(98) (1.97)% (154) (3.17)%Prj 3E.6 4906 40.08%4856(122) (2.45)%4956(16) (0.32)% (115) (2.25)%Prj 3E.13A 4813(89) (1.82)%4773(205) (4.12)%4874(98) (1.97)% (154) (3.17)%Prj 3E.6A 4906 40.08%4856(122)(2.45)%4956(16) (0.32)% (115) (2.25)%All2013-142014-152015-16Average AverageGrades Total Diff % Total Diff % Total Diff % Diff %ACTUAL 14,971 xxx xxx 15,277 xxx xxx 15,663 xxx xxx xxx xxxPrj 3E.13 14,328(643) (4.29)%14,662(615) (4.03)%15,182(481) (3.07)% (289) (2.43)%Prj 3E.6 14,406(565) (3.77)%14,701(576) (3.77)%15,248(415) (2.65)% (223) (1.97)%Prj 3E.13A 14,302(669) (4.47)%14,646(631) (4.13)%15,109(554) (3.54)% (315) (2.61)%Prj 3E.6A 14,377(594) (3.97)%14,680(597) (3.91)%15,168(495) (3.16)% (251) (2.16)%PROJECTION COMPARISONSBY GRADE GROUP (Continued)Page 13 October 2015 Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 20BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULEStudent Generation FactorsASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi-1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2016 SF 2016 MFFamily Family2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2016 as allowed per King County OrdinanceElementary 0.2260 0.07203 Takes area labeled Lakeland and Kersey Projects projects across 2016-2022Middle School 0.0820 0.02204 Takes area labeled Bridges and other Lea Hill area developments and projects across 2016-2022Senior High 0.0940 0.04405 Includes known developments in N. Auburn and other non-Lea Hill and non-Lakeland developmentsTotal 0.4020 0.1380Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 TotalLakeland/Kersey Single Family 100 100 75 75 60 30 440Lea Hill Area Single Family 50 50 50 40 30 20 18 258Other Single Family Units 60 70 60 30 30 14 5 269Total Single Family Units 210 220 185 145 120 64 23 967Projected Pupils:K-5 47 50 42 33 27 14 5 2196-8 17 18 15 12 10 5 2 799-12 20 21 17 14 11 6 2 91K-12 84 88 74 58 48 26 9389Multi Family Units 0 0 200 120 48 0 0 368Total Multi Family Units 0 0 200 120 48 0 0 368Projected Pupils:K-500149300266-8004310089-12009520016K-12 0 0 28 17 7 0 051Total Housing Units 210 220 385 265 168 64 23 1335K-5 47 50 56 41 31 14 5 2456-8 17 18 20 15 11 5 2 879-12 20 21 26 19 13 6 2 107K-12 84 88 102 75 55 26 9440Cumulative Projection2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2347 97 153 195 225 240 24517 35 55 69 80 86 8720 40 67 86 99 105 10784 173 275 350 405 430 440Auburn FactorsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsTotalMid School PupilsSr. High PupilsElementary PupilsMid School PupilsTotalTotalSr. High PupilsElementary - Grades K -5Mid School - Grades 6 - 8Senior High - Grades 9 - 12Total Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 201TABLE New Projects - Annual New Pupils Added & Distributed2 by Grade Level 6 Year Percent of averageGRADE Average Pupils by Grade 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23Enroll. & LevelKDG 11237.54%1198 6 13 21 26 31 32 331 11527.73%1279 7 13 21 27 31 33 342 11347.62% 44.92%1289 6 13 21 27 31 33 333 11027.40%1232 6 13 20 26 30 32 334 10897.31%1170 6 13 20 26 30 31 325 10897.31%1172 6 13 20 26 30 31 326 10667.16%1116 6 12 20 25 29 31 317 10737.21% 21.66%1099 6 12 20 25 29 31 328 10867.29%1136 6 13 20 25 29 31 329 12268.23%1229 7 14 23 29 33 35 3610 12338.28% 33.43%1316 7 14 23 29 34 36 3611 12128.14%1167 7 14 22 28 33 35 3612 13068.77%1260 7 15 24 31 35 38 39Totals 14892100.00% Total 15663 84 173 275 350 405 430 440TABLE 6 year Historical Data3 Average Enrollment and Percentage Distributed by Grade LevelGrade10-11 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-166yr Ave %KDG 1010 1029 1098 1170 1232 1198 1122.83 7.54%1 1066 1068 1089 1188 1219 1279 1151.50 7.73%2 1016 1097 1083 1124 1196 1289 1134.17 7.62%3 1013 996 1111 1125 1136 1232 1102.17 7.40%4 1024 1022 1038 1123 1156 1170 1088.83 7.31%5 1079 1018 1070 1075 1122 1172 1089.33 7.31%6 1041 1063 1041 1076 1059 1116 1066.00 7.16%7 1060 1032 1086 1072 1091 1099 1073.33 7.21%8 1112 1046 1017 1116 1088 1136 1085.83 7.29%9 1221 1273 1200 1159 1275 1229 1226.17 8.23%10 1238 1170 1278 1229 1169 1316 1233.33 8.28%11 1258 1233 1164 1240 1211 1167 1212.17 8.14%12 1344 1316 1321 1274 1323 1260 1306.33 8.77%Totals 14482 14363 14596 14971 15277 15663 14892.00 100.00%% of change -0.82% 1.62% 2.57% 2.04% 2.53%change +/- (119)233 375 306 3864 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 201TABLE 4 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.13 by Grade Level Updated April 2016Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1198 1227 1257 1288 1316 1344 1368 1392enrollees move to the next1 1279 1256 1285 1316 1345 1372 1397 1421grade level.2 1289 1303 1280 1311 1339 1367 1392 14153 1232 1310 1324 1302 1331 1358 1383 1406Kindergarten calculates 4 1170 1267 1345 1361 1336 1363 1388 1412previous years number plus5 1172 1197 1294 1373 1386 1360 1385 1409K-5 7340 7560 7786 7950 8054 8163 8313 8455Current generation based on 6 1116 1182 1206 1304 1382 1393 1365 1389% of total enrollment. Other7 1099 1139 1205 1231 1327 1403 1413 1383factor uses 100% cohort 8 1136 1117 1157 1224 1248 1343 1417 1425survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3351 3438 3569 3760 3957 4139 4194 4197history.9 1229 1351 1333 1375 1441 1464 1557 163010 1316 1218 1340 1323 1363 1428 1448 154011 1167 1279 1181 1304 1285 1324 1385 140412 1260 1200 1313 1216 1338 1317 1354 1414GR 9-12 4972 5047 5166 5219 5427 5532 5744 5988Total 15663 16045 16521 16929 17438 17835 18251 18640% of change 2.44% 2.97% 2.47% 3.01% 2.28% 2.33% 2.13%change +/- 382 476 408 509 397 416 389TABLE 5 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6 by Grade Level Updated April 2016Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2022-23 2023-24model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1198 1242 1286 1332 1375 1417 1456 1494 1511 1528enrollees move to the next1 1279 1261 1305 1351 1394 1436 1476 1514 1531 1548grade level.2 1289 1309 1291 1337 1380 1422 1461 1499 1516 15343 1232 1312 1332 1315 1358 1400 1439 1477 1494 1511Kindergarten calculates 4 1170 1265 1345 1366 1347 1388 1428 1466 1483 1499previous years number plus5 1172 1193 1288 1369 1388 1367 1407 1445 1461 1478K-5 7340 7581 7847 8068 8241 8429 8666 8896 8997 9099Current generation based on 6 1116 1178 1199 1295 1374 1392 1369 1407 1423 1439% of total enrollment. Other7 1099 1142 1205 1227 1321 1398 1414 1390 1405 1421factor uses 100% cohort 8 1136 1113 1157 1221 1241 1333 1409 1423 1439 1455survival, based on 6 yearGR 6-8 3351 3434 3561 3743 3935 4123 4191 4220 4268 4316history.9 1229 1301 1279 1325 1387 1406 1497 1571 1589 160710 1316 1241 1313 1292 1336 1397 1413 1503 1520 153711 1167 1308 1233 1306 1283 1325 1383 1399 1415 143112 1260 1246 1388 1315 1386 1362 1401 1458 1475 1492GR 9-12 4972 5096 5213 5238 5392 5490 5695 5931 5998 6066Total 15663 16111 16621 17049 17569 18042 18552 19047 19263 19481% of change 2.86% 3.17% 2.57% 3.05% 2.69% 2.83% 2.67% 1.14% 1.14%change +/- 448 511 427 520 473 510 494 216 2194 Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 201TABLE 6 New Developments - Pupil Projection Cumulative 2.83% 1.14%ND3.13Aby Grade Level Updated April 2016Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1198 1146 1167 1177 1195enrollees move to the next1 1279 1256 1204 1226 1235 1250grade level.2 1289 1303 1280 1230 1249 1256 12703 1232 1310 1324 1302 1249 1268 1272 1284Kindergarten calculates 4 1170 1267 1345 1361 1336 1282 1298 1301birth rate average plus5 1172 1197 1294 1373 1386 1360 1304 13197340 7479 7615 7669 7650 6416 5144 3904Current generation based on 6 1116 1182 1206 1304 1382 1393 1365 1308% of total enrollment. Other7 1099 1139 1205 1231 1327 1403 1413 1383factor uses 100% cohort 8 1136 1117 1157 1224 1248 1343 1417 1425survival, based on 6 year3351 3438 3569 3760 3957 4139 4194 4116history.9 1229 1351 1333 1375 1441 1464 1557 163010 1316 1218 1340 1323 1363 1428 1448 154011 1167 1279 1181 1304 1285 1324 1385 140412 1260 1200 1313 1216 1338 1317 1354 14144972 5047 5166 5219 5427 5532 5744 5988Total 15663 15964 16350 16647 17035% of change 1.92% 2.42% 1.82% 2.33%change +/- 301 387 297 387TABLE 7 New Projects - Pupil Projection Cumulative ND 3.6Aby Grade Level Updated April 2016Uses a 'cohort survival'GRADE 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23model assuming 100% ofActual Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projected Projectedprevious year newKDG 1198 1146 1167 1177 1195enrollees move to the next1 1279 1261 1210 1232 1240 1256grade level.2 1289 1309 1291 1241 1261 1267 12813 1232 1312 1332 1315 1262 1281 1285 1297Kindergarten calculates 4 1170 1265 1345 1366 1347 1292 1309 1312birth rate average plus5 1172 1193 1288 1369 1388 1367 1311 13267340 7485 7632 7699 7692Current generation based on 6 1116 1178 1199 1295 1374 1392 1369 1311% of total enrollment. Other7 1099 1142 1205 1227 1321 1398 1414 1390factor uses 100% cohort 8 1136 1113 1157 1221 1241 1333 1409 1423survival, based on 6 year3351 3434 3561 3743 3935 4123 4191 4124history.9 1229 1301 1279 1325 1387 1406 1497 157110 1316 1241 1313 1292 1336 1397 1413 150311 1167 1308 1233 1306 1283 1325 1383 139912 1260 1246 1388 1315 1386 1362 1401 14584972 5096 5213 5238 5392 5490 5695 5931Total 15663 16015 16406 16679 17019% of change 2.25% 2.44% 1.66% 2.04%change +/- 352 392 273 340 Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/10 April 2016SINGLE FAMILYUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS TotalAlicia Glenn2424 0 4 7 2 13 0.167 0.292 0.083 0.542Beaver Meadows6060 0 19 8 6 33 0.317 0.133 0.100 0.550Brandon Meadows5555 0 19 2 8 29 0.345 0.036 0.145 0.527Bridges386 236 150 37 19 17 73 0.157 0.081 0.072 0.309Carrington Pointe2424 0 10 2 1 13 0.417 0.083 0.042 0.542Greenacres1616 061290.375 0.063 0.125 0.563Kendall Ridge106 106 0 18 9 12 39 0.170 0.085 0.113 0.368Lakeland East: Portola130 130 0 44 16 24 84 0.338 0.123 0.185 0.646Lakeland: Edgeview 373 373 0 52 10 14 76 0.139 0.027 0.038 0.204Lakeland Hills Estates6630 3632050.100 0.067 0.000 0.167Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates7676 0 46 12 19 77 0.605 0.158 0.250 1.013Lakeland: Villas At …8181 0 15 1 3 19 0.185 0.012 0.037 0.235Lakeland: Vista Heights125 125 0 42 19 21 82 0.336 0.152 0.168 0.656Lawson Place1414 032490.214 0.143 0.286 0.643Monterey Park239 239 0 39 20 15 74 0.163 0.084 0.063 0.310Mountain View5515 4000110.000 0.000 0.067 0.067Sonata Hills7268 4 7 2 3 12 0.103 0.029 0.044 0.176Sterling Court88 030360.375 0.000 0.375 0.750Trail Run169 169 0 52 16 18 86 0.308 0.095 0.107 0.509Vintage Place2525 0 5 6 4 15 0.200 0.240 0.160 0.600Totals 2104 1874230424 154 177755 0.226 0.082 0.094 0.403Actual StudentsStudent Generation Factors55/16/2016 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/10April 2016Current Construction to be Occupied 2016 and beyondUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS TotalBridges386 236 150 37 19 17 7334 12 1460Lakeland Hills Estates6630 363205 8 3 3 15Mountain View5515 400011 9 3 4 16Sonata Hills7268 4 7 2 3 121 0 02Totals 579 349 23047 23 21 9152 19 22932016 and beyondUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS TotalAnderson Acres140 143 1 16Backbone Ridge70 72 1 13Bridle Estates180 184 1 27Canyon Creek (formerly Cam-West)1540 15435 13 15 62Hazel Heights220 225 2 29Hazel View200 205 2 28Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..300 307 2 3 12Lakeland: Park Ridge2560 25658 21 24 103Lakeland: River Rock140 143 1 16Megan's Meadows90 92 1 14Pacific Lane110 112 1 14Ridge At Tall Timbers1040 10424 9 10 42Spencer Place130 133 1 15Vista Center (formerly Estes Park)310 317 3 3 12Willow Place180 184 1 27Yates Plat160 164 1 26737737Totals 2016 and beyond167 61 70 297Grand Totals 219 79 91 390Student Generation FactorsStudent Generation FactorsActual Students Estimated Students Based onEstimated Students Based on/16/2016 Auburn School DistrictDevelopment Growth since 1/1/10May 2016MULTI FAMILYUnits/ Current To BeDevelopment Name Parcels Occupancy Occupied Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS TotalLakeland: Four Lakes Apts234 2340 9 4 11 24 0.038 0.017 0.047 0.103Legend Townhomes11 11 0 31150.273 0.091 0.091 0.455Trail Run Townhomes115 1150 14 3 4 21 0.122 0.026 0.035 0.183360 3600 26 8 16 50 0.072 0.022 0.044 0.1392016 and beyondPromenade Apts (formerly Auburn Hills)3200 32023 7 14 44Sundallen Condos48 0 483127368368Total27 8 16 51Student Generation Factors 5 5/16/2016 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Adopted June 14, 2016 BOARD OF EDUCATION Geoffery McAnalloy Claire Wilson Liz Drake Carol Gregory Hiroshi Eto SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief of Finance & Operations Tanya Nascimento, Student & Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Introduction 10 Map - Elementary Boundaries 11 Map - Middle School Boundaries 12 Map - High School Boundaries 13 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 14 Building Capacities 15-17 Portable Locations 18-19 Student Forecast 20-22 Capacity Summaries 23-27 King County Impact Fee Calculations 28-30 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2016 PLAN 31-33 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.3260 effective March 1996, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its 2017 Capital Facilities Plan as of May 2016. This Plan is scheduled for adoption by King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is also included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council four Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. Currently, construction is underway to replace Federal Way High School and to increase capacity by approximately 200 students. Federal Way High School was built in 1938. The estimated cost to rebuild Federal Way High School is $106 million. The District began Phase I in Summer 2014. Phase I consists of site work and preparation for the portable village that will house students during the construction of the new building. Phase II, demolition of the existing classrooms and rebuild, began in January 2015. The existing cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen will continue to be in use during construction. The newly constructed building is scheduled for use beginning in the 2016-17 school year. Phase III, demolition of the cafeteria, gymnasium, and kitchen, and construction of athletic fields, will begin this summer and is expected to be completed by Fall 2017. The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State continues to phase in funding based on a reduction of K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Initiative Measure No. 1351 would further reduce these class sizes in schools where more than 50% of students were eligible for free and reduced-price meals in the prior year. Under this measure, class sizes in those schools would be reduced to 15 in grades K-3, 22 in grade 4, and 23 in grades 5-12. The additional class size reductions required by FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 Initiative 1351 would increase our classroom need from 60 to 120 at our Elementary & K-8 schools and add a need for an additional 26 classrooms at our Secondary schools. The 2015 Legislature provided $200 million in competitive grant capital funds to help school districts achieve progress towards class size reduction and all-day kindergarten goals. As a condition of grant application, districts were required to certify and count and usage of all K-3 classrooms and other teaching stations. This certification process demonstrated a District need for 60 additional K-3 classrooms. The District applied for and has been awarded a grant amount, yet to be determined, to add additional K-3 capacity. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. The maps included in this Plan reflect our current boundaries. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Saghalie 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAF Academy (6-12) 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 LEASED SPACE Federal Way Acceleration Academy 2104 S 314th St, Ste 2104 Federal Way 98003 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. Federal Way High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Capital levy request As part of the multi-phase plan, the District intends to increase capacity for high school students with expansion at the Federal Way High School site. Increased capacity at Federal Way High and Decatur High in later phases, supplant the need for construction of a fifth comprehensive high school. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS Elementary #24 TBD K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant and Bond request Elementary #25 TBD K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant and Bond request Recent analysis confirms the need for 60 new elementary classrooms to meet K-3 class size reduction requirements. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 9Six Year Finance PlanSecured FundingSourcesImpact Fees (1) $20,141Land Sale Funds (2)($4,532,182)Bond or Levy Funds (3) $16,745,512State Match (4) $1,287,848TOTAL $13,521,319Projected RevenueSourcesState Match (5) $34,000,000Bond or Levy Funds (6)$30,000,000Land Fund Sales (7) $0Impact Fees (8) $1,400,000TOTAL $65,400,000Actual and Planned ExpendituresTotal Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $78,921,319NEW SCHOOLS Estimated and Budget 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Total CostPrior Years 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2017-2023MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSIONFederal Way High School (9)$46,000,000$30,000,000 $20,000,000 $10,000,000 $60,000,000$106,000,000SITE ACQUISITIONNorman Center $1,205,000$220,000 $225,000 $235,000 $235,000 $915,000$2,120,000 (Employment Transtion Program) (10)TEMPORARY FACILITIESPortables (11) $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,400,000$1,400,000TOTAL $47,205,000 $30,420,000 $20,425,000 $10,435,000 $435,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $62,315,000 $109,520,000NOTES:`1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/15. 2. This is year end balance on 12/31/15.3. This is the 12/31/15 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings.4. This represents the balance of State Match Funds which will be used to to support the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. This is the balance on 12/31/15.5. This is anticipated State Match for the rebuilding of Federal Way High School. Application for funds was made in July 2013.6. These include $30m of the $60m six-year levy approved in November 2012.7. Projected sale of surplus properties.8. These are projected fees based upon known residential developments in the District, $25,000 per month over the next 6 years.9. Project budget has been adjusted to match current project cost estimates.10. Norman Center was purchased in 2010 to house the Employment Transition Program. The $2.1m purchase has been financed through a state approved LOCAL program through 2020.11. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS OF DISTRICT BOUNDARIES Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, seven middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and three small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The TAF Academy serves students in grades 6- 12 who reside in the Totem Middle School service area. The programs at Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. The following maps show the service area boundaries for each school, by school type. (Career Academy at Truman High School and Federal Way Public Academy serve students from throughout the District). The identified boundaries are reviewed annually. Any change in grade configuration or adoption of programs that affect school populations may necessitate a change in school service areas. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School Districts are different. If the District does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the District and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2017 through 2023 Capacity Summaries King County Impact Fees - Single and Multi-Family Units FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 Building Capacities This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with McCleary. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, with the implementation of McCleary which requires a significant reduction in K-3 class sizes, elementary capacity, in this Plan, will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces, the number of students assigned to each classroom and the extent of support facilities available for students, staff, parents, and the community. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 20 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 20 17 25-28 Grade 3 25 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Music Rooms: Each elementary school requires a standard classroom for music instruction. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each elementary and middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each elementary, middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 8 elementary schools. We also have the ECEAP and Headstart program at 6 schools (4 elementary & 3 high schools). These programs decrease capacity at those sites. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 17 BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITIES ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount School Name Headcount FTE Adelaide 374 Illahee 810 818 Brigadoon 282 Kilo 783 791 Camelot 277 Lakota 766 774 Enterprise 337 Sacajawea 609 615 Green Gables 404 Saghalie 703 710 Lake Dolloff 366 Sequoyah 556 562 Lake Grove 353 Totem 770 778 Lakeland 341 Federal Way Public Academy 199 201 Mark Twain 430 Technology Access Foundation Academy** Meredith Hill 378 TOTAL 5,196 5,249 Mirror Lake 270 Nautilus (K-8)432 *Middle School Average 714 721 Olympic View 370 Panther Lake 330 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Rainier View 355 PROGRAM CAPACITY Sherwood Forest 486 Silver Lake 387 School Name Headcount FTE Star Lake 358 Decatur 1244 1,330 Sunnycrest 413 Federal Way 1431 1,530 Twin Lakes 392 Thomas Jefferson 1224 1,309 Valhalla 406 Todd Beamer 1085 1,160 Wildwood 372 Career Academy at Truman 159 170 Woodmont (K-8)357 Federal Way Public Academy 109 117 TOTAL 8,470 Employment Transition Program 48 51 Technology Access Foundation Academy** TOTAL 5,300 5,668 Elementary Average 368 *High School Average 1,246 1,333 Notes: * Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Truman High School, and Employment Transition Program are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. ** Technology Access Foundation Academy is housed entirely in portables on the Totem Middle School site. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 Portable Locations The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as temporary facilities or interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide temporary housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. It is the practice and philosophy of Federal Way Public Schools that portables are not acceptable as permanent facilities. The District is investigating alternatives to portables. We are currently in the planning phase of designing buildings that would require shorter construction time and provide permanent classroom space for our students. These buildings may replace the need for portables in the future. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for temporary educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL* INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 12Decatur 81 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 10 Enterprise 3 Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1 TAF Academy 82 Lake Dolloff 1 1 TOTAL 34 3 Lake Grove 11 Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 12 Mirror Lake 6 4 PORTABLES LOCATED Nautilus 1 AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Olympic View 2 Panther Lake 22MOT Rainier View 32TDC 9 Sherwood Forest 2 2 TOTAL 9 Silver Lake 4 Star Lake 4 Sunnycrest 4 2 HEAD START PORTABLES AT DISTRICT SITES Twin Lakes 12 Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood 4 Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 47 26 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 3 Kilo 7 Lakota Sacajawea 3 Saghalie 4 Sequoyah 2 Totem TAF Academy 82 TOTAL 13 16 *Non-instructional portables at Mirror Lake, Panther Lake, Rainier View, Silver Lake, and Sunnycrest Elementaries will be in use as Instructional portables in the 2016-17 school year. PORTABLE LOCATIONS FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20 Student Forecast Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts, and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In December 2012, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2013. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2023. This model produces a projection that is between 23,000 and 24,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Currently there are three new multi-family complexes planned within the District. These three complexes have a total of 819 units. Two of the three developments opened and occupied during the 2015-16 school year. The third development, which will have about 300 units, is scheduled to be ready for occupancy during the 2016-17 school year. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 Full Time Equivalent Enrollment History and Projections Simplified FTE (K Headcount = .5 FTE; Middle School FTE=.99 Headcount; High School FTE = .935Headcount) Total K -12 Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School FTE Change 2011 2010-11 8,753 5,142 6,544 20,439 2012 2011-12 8,800 5,134 6,448 20,382 -0.3% 2013 2012-13 8,914 4,963 6,367 20,244 -0.7% 2014 2013-14 9,230 4,801 6,354 20,384 0.7% 2015 2014-15 9,177 4,884 6,402 20,462 0.4% 2016 2015-16 9,397 5,047 6,273 20,717 1.2% 2017 B2016-17 9,579 5,171 6,212 20,962 1.2% 2018 P2017-18 9,830 5,458 5,890 21,178 1.0% 2019 P2018-19 9,927 5,432 6,034 21,393 1.0% 2020 P2019-20 9,994 5,573 6,078 21,645 1.2% 2021 P2020-21 10,077 5,675 6,219 21,971 1.5% 2022 P2021-22 10,198 5,733 6,255 22,186 1.0% 2023 P2022-23 10,322 5,716 6,293 22,331 0.6% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 21,000 22,000 23,000 School Year Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast FTE FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23 Capacity Summaries All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized in spreadsheet format, with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 24 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ALL GRADES Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 18,966 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 FTE CAPACITY 19,387 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 Add or subtract changes to capacity Increase Capacity at Federal Way HS 200 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 19,166 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 19,587 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 20,962 21,178 21,393 21,645 21,971 22,186 22,331 Internet Academy Enrollment (AAFTE)(315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) (315) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 20,647 20,863 21,078 21,330 21,656 21,871 22,016 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (1,060) (1,276) (1,491) (1,743) (2,069) (2,284) (2,429) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,162 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 Deduct Portable Capacity (75) Add New Portable Capacity 84 Adjusted Portable Capacity 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 2,171 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 1,111 895 680 428 102 (113) (258) FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 25 CAPACITY SUMMARY - ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 FTE CAPACITY 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 8,470 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 9,579 9,830 9,927 9,994 10,077 10,198 10,322 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) (36) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,543 9,794 9,891 9,958 10,041 10,162 10,286 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (1,073) (1,324) (1,421) (1,488) (1,571) (1,692) (1,816) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 987 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 Add/Subtract portable capacity Add portable capacity at Rainier View 84 and Sunnycrest Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY (2) (253) (350) (417) (500) (621) (745) NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 26 CAPACITY SUMMARY - MIDDLE SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 FTE CAPACITY 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 Add or subtract changes in capacity Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 5,196 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 5,249 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 5,171 5,458 5,432 5,573 5,675 5,733 5,716 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) (74) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,097 5,384 5,358 5,499 5,601 5,659 5,642 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY 152 (135) (109) (250) (352) (410) (393) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 Add/Subtract portable capacity Adjusted Portable Capacity 325 325 325 325 325 325 325 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 477 190 216 75 (27) (85) (68) NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 27 CAPACITY SUMMARY - HIGH SCHOOLS Budget - - Projected - - Calendar Year 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 CAPACITY School Year 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,300 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 FTE CAPACITY 5,668 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 Add or subtract changes in capacity Add capacity to Federal Way HS 200 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 5,500 Adjusted Program FTE Capacity 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 5,868 ENROLLMENT Basic FTE Enrollment 6,212 5,890 6,034 6,078 6,219 6,255 6,293 Internet Academy (AAFTE)1 (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) (205) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,007 5,685 5,829 5,873 6,014 6,050 6,088 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (139)183 39 (5) (146) (182) (220) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 850 775 775 775 775 775 775 Add/Subtract portable capacity Subtract portable capacity at Federal Way HS (75) Adjusted Portable Capacity 775 775 775 775 775 775 775 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 636 958 814 770 629 593 555 NOTES: 1. Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3. Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 King County, the City of Federal Way, and the City of Kent Impact Fee Calculations Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. - STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR ANALYSIS Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years - IMPACT FEE CALCULATION Following the calculations for the student generation factor is a copy of the Impact Fee Calculation for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act.  Temporary Facility Cost is the average cost of a portable purchased within the last 5 years. Plan Year 2016 Plan Year 2017 Single Family Units $2,899 $3,198 Multi-Family Units (King County, Auburn, Kent)1 $506 $8,386 Multi-Family Units – City of Federal Way2 $9,273 $8,386 Mixed-Use Residential3 $4,637 $4,193 1 Based on impact fee calculation in the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan, this fee applies to King County, City of Auburn, City of Kent and, if an impact fee ordinance is adopted, City of Des Moines. 2 Based on impact fee calculation in the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan as Restated for the City of Federal Way. This fee applies to the City of Federal Way. 3 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 29 STUDENT GENERATIONNEW CONSTRUCTION IN PRIOR 5 YEARSSingle Family Student GenerationNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalSingle Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(16) Jefferson Place 11 6 0 0 0.5455 0.0000 0.0000 0.5455(16) Star Lake East 30 3 2 8 0.1000 0.0667 0.2667 0.4334(15) Swan Song 29 6 2 4 0.2069 0.0690 0.1379 0.4138(15) Wynstone East 114 29 27 15 0.2544 0.2368 0.1316 0.6228(14) North Lake Rim 37 2 2 6 0.0541 0.0541 0.1622 0.2704(14) Wynstone 44 13 2 6 0.2955 0.0455 0.1364 0.4774(13) Lake Point 22 4 4 0 0.1818 0.1818 0.0000 0.3636(13) Saghalie Firs 34 8 4 5 0.2353 0.1176 0.1471 0.5000(12) Ming Court 15 8 4 4 0.5333 0.2667 0.2667 1.0667(12) Sunset Gardens 12 7 2 0 0.5833 0.1667 0.0000 0.7500Total348 86 49 48Student Generation*0.2471 0.1408 0.1379 0.5259Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal WayNumber of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School TotalMulti Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student StudentDEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(16) Kandila Townhomes 27 1 2 0 0.0034 0.0068 0.0000 0.0102(15) Park 16 293 171 88 83 0.5836 0.3003 0.2833 1.1672Total320 172 90 83Student Generation*0.5375 0.2813 0.2594 1.0781 * Student Generation rate is based on totals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 IMPACT FEE School Site Acquisition Cost:Student Student Facility Cost / Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 0.2471 0.5375 $0 $0 Middle School 0.1408 0.2813 $0 $0 High School 4.85 $216,718 51 0.1379 0.2594 $2,839 $5,341 TOTAL $2,839 $5,341 School Construction Cost:Student Student % Perm Fac./ Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 94.54% 0.2471 0.5375 $0 $0 Middle School 97.26% 0.1408 0.2813 $0 $0 High School 96.86% $13,780,000 200 0.1379 0.2594 $9,203 $17,311 TO TAL $9,203 $17,311 Temporary Facility Cost:Student Student % Temp Fac. Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.46% $178,686 84 0.2471 0.5375 $29 $62 Middle School 2.74% 0.1408 0.2813 $0 $0 High School 3.14% 0.1379 0.2594 $0 $0 TOTAL $29 $62 State Matching Credit Calculation:Student Student Construction Cost Sq. Ft. State Factor Factor Cost/ Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $213.23 0.2471 0.5375 $0 $0 Middle School $213.23 0.1408 0.2813 $0 $0 High School $213.23 130 65.59% 0.1379 0.2594 $2,507 $4,716 Total $2,507 $4,716 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (March 2016) $274,781 $106,352 Capital Bond Interest Rate (February 2016) 3.27% 3.27% Net Present Value of Av erage Dwelling $2,311,968 $894,831 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.37 $1.37 Present Value of Revenue Stream $3,167 $1,226 Single Family Multi-Family Residences Residences Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost $2,839 5,341$ Permanent Facility Cost $9,203 17,311$ Temporary Facility Cost $29 62$ State Match Credit (2,507)$ (4,716)$ Tax Payment Credit (3,167)$ (1,226)$ Sub-Total 6,396$ 16,772$ 50% Local Share 3,198$ 8,386$ Calculated Impact Fee 3,198$ 8,386$ FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 SECTION 4 SUMMARY OF CHANGES FROM THE 2016 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The 2017 Capital Facilities Plan is an updated document, based on the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan. The changes between the 2016 Plan and the 2017 Plan are listed below. SECTION I - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN The Six Year Finance Plan has been rolled forward to reflect 2017-2023 and adjusted for anticipated Federal Way High School construction schedule. The plan is found on page 9. SECTION III - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION CAPACITY Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 17. PORTABLES The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on page 18.9 STUDENT FORECAST The Student Forecast now covers 2017 through 2023 Enrollment history and projections are found on page 22. CAPACITY SUMMARY The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 24-27. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION - KING COUNTY CODE 21A The Impact Fee Calculations have changed due to changes in several factors. The adjustment made in the Impact Fee Calculation, causing a change in the Impact Fee between the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan can be found on page 32 and 33. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 32 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2016 TO 2017 STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS Student Generation factors are based on rates for new developments constructed over a period of not more than five years prior to the date of the fee calculation. The changes in student Generation factors between the 2016 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan are due to developments that were deleted or added based upon the age of the developments and the year placed in the survey. The Student Generation worksheet is found on page 29. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COSTS The anticipated cost based on 2013 estimate for replacing Federal Way High is $106,000,000. The replacement will add 200 additional seats. The current capacity of Federal Way High is 1538. The addition of 200 seats will increase capacity by 13%. Total Cost $106,000,000 x .13 = $13,780,000 SCHOOL ACQUISITION COSTS The district purchased the Norman Center to house the Employment Transition Program and to allow for the expansion of the ECEAP program. The purchase and use of this site increased our high school capacity by 51 students. Total Cost $2,100,000 / 2 = $1,050,000 Cost per Acre $1,050,000 / 4.85 = $216,718 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for the 2017 Capital Facilities Plan. The capacity of Federal Way High may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2017 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 33 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.10% to 95.30%Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.87% to 4.70%Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $184,183 to $178,686 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2015. Construction Cost Allocation $200.40 to $213.23 Change effective July 2016 State Match 64.73% to 65.59%Change effective July 2016 Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $257,998 to $274,781 Service District (ESD 121) MFR- $99,030 to $106,352 Capital Bond Interest Rate 3.68% to 3.27%Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.44 to $1.37 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Elementary .3204 to .2471 Middle School .1647 to .1408 High School .1257 to .1379 Multi-Family - City of Federal Way Elementary .5802 to .5375 Middle School .3072 to .2813 High School .2799 to .2594 Multi-Family - King Co, Auburn & Kent Elementary .0990 to .5375 Middle School .0320 to .2813 High School .0310 to .2594 Impact Fee SFR- $2,899 to $3,198 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR (King Co, Auburn & Kent)- $506 to $8,386 MFR based on the updated calculation MFR (City of Federal Way)- $9,273 to $8,386 Note: Student generation factors for are single family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Student generation factors for are multi- family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2016 TO 2017 This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2016 Federal Way Public Schools 33330 8th Avenue S Federal Way, Washington 98003 (253) 945‐2000 GRADUATION AND ADVANCEMENT Each student will graduate with the prerequisite skills and confidence to access college, career, and other post‐secondary options. ENDS Our students will graduate with the academic knowledge and 21st century skills ready to succeed as a responsible citizen. ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT Each student, at every grade level, will perform at or above the state or district standards in all disciplines. PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITIY AND CITIZENSHIP Each student will take responsibility for his/her academic success and exhibit positive, ethical, behaviors treating others with dignity and respect. EACH SCHOLAR: A VOICE. A DREAM. A BRIGHT FUTURE. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Issued with a 14-day comment period Description of Proposal: This threshold determination analyzes the environmental impacts associated with the following actions, which are so closely related to each other that they are in effect a single course of action: 1. The adoption of the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2022 by the Auburn School District No. 408 for the purposes of planning for the facilities needs of the District; 2. The amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of King County and the cities of Auburn and Kent to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2016-2022 as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Plan; and 3. The potential amendment of the Comprehensive Plans of the cities of Algona, Black Diamond, and Pacific to include the Auburn School District's Capital Facilities Plan 2016- 2022 as part of the Capital Facilities Element of each jurisdiction’s Comprehensive Plan. Proponent: Auburn School District No. 408 Location of the Proposal: The Auburn School District includes an area of approximately 62 square miles. Portions of unincorporated King County and County and the cities of Algona, Auburn, Black Diamond, Kent, and Pacific fall within the District's boundaries. Lead Agency: Auburn School District No. 408 The lead agency for this proposal has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant adverse environmental impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after a review of the completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2). The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date of issue. Comments must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. on June 13, 2016. The responsible official will reconsider the DNS based on timely comments and may retain, modify, or, if significant adverse impacts are likely, withdraw the DNS. If the DNS is retained, it will be final after the expiration of the comment deadline. Responsible Official: Dr. Alan Spicciati Superintendent Auburn School District No. 408 Telephone: (253) 931-4900 Address: Auburn School District 915 4th Street NE Auburn, WA 98002 Questions may be directed and comments may be submitted by 4:30 p.m., June 13, 2016, to: Bob Kenworthy, Assistant Director, Capital Projects, Auburn School District No. 408, 915 4th Street NE, Auburn, WA 98002. Date of Issue: May 27, 2016 Date Published: May 27, 2016 - Auburn Reporter