HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-17-2019 City Council AgendaCity Council Meeting
J une 17, 2019 - 7:00 P M
City Hall Council Chambers
A GE NDA
Watch the meeting L I V E !
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I .C AL L T O O RD E R
A .P ledge of Allegiance
B .Roll Call
I I .ANNO UNC E M E NT S, P RO C L AM AT IO NS, AND P RE S E NTAT I O NS
A .L G B T Q+ Pride Month Proclamation
Mayor Backus to proclaim J une 2019 as "L G B T Q+ P ride Month" in the city of Auburn.
I I I .AP P O I NT M E NT S
I V.AG E ND A M O D I F IC AT I O NS
V.C IT IZE N I NP UT, P UB L I C HE ARI NG S AND C O RRE S P O ND E NC E
A .P ublic Hearings
1.Public Hearing for Right-of-Way Vacation V 1-18 (Gaub)
City Council to hold a Public Hearing in consideration of Right-of-Way Vacation
V1-18.
2.Public Hearing for 2020-2025 Transportation
I mprovement Plan (Gaub)
City Council to hold a public hearing in consideration of adoption of the 2020-
2025 Transportation I mprovement.
B .Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City
Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form
provided.
C.Correspondence - (T here is no correspondence for Council review.)
V I .C O UNC I L AD HO C C O M M IT T E E RE P O RT S
Council Ad Hoc Committee Chairs may report on the status of their ad hoc Council
Committees' progress on assigned tasks and may give their recommendation to the
City Council, if any.
Page 1 of 245
V I I .C O NS E NT AG E ND A
All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed.
A .Minutes of the J une 3, 2019 Regular Council Meeting
B .Minutes of the May 13, 2019 and J une 10, 2019 Study
S essions
C.Claims Vouchers (Coleman)
Claims voucher list dated J une 17, 2019 which includes voucher numbers 453989
through 454199 in the amount of $4,980,929.04 and three wire transfers in the amount
of $502,375.86.
D.P ayroll Vouchers (Coleman)
P ayroll check numbers 538477 through 538496 in the amount of $242,613.37,
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $2,102,351.41 for a grand total of
$2,344,964.78 for the period covering 5/30/2019 to 6/12/2019.
E .S etting Public Hearing Date for Franchise A greement No.
F R N19-0012 for Comcast (Gaub)
F.S etting a P ublic Hearing Date for North Auburn L ogistics
Water P ayback Agreement (Gaub)
G.P ublic Works P roject No. C P 1726 (Gaub)
Award Contract No. 19-05, to Rodarte Construction, I nc. on their low bid of
$3,101,975.75 plus Washington State sales tax of $113,298.27 for a total contract
price of $3,215,274.02 for Project No. C P1726, 2019 L ocal S treet Reconstruction
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to approve the Consent Agenda.)
V I I I .UNF INIS HE D B US I NE S S
I X.NE W B US I NE S S
X .O RD INANC E S
A .Ordinance No. 6687 (Gaub)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, approving the
vacation of right-of-way in the vicinity of S E 328th S treet and 60th Avenue South
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T IO N: M ove to adopt Ordinance No. 6687.)
X I .RE S O L UT IO NS
A .Resolution No. 5378 (Gaub)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
dedication of a portion of City-owned property as City right-of-way
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5378.)
Page 2 of 245
B .Resolution No. 5432 (Gaub)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, approving and
adopting the 2020-2025 Transportation I mprovement P rogram of the City of Auburn
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5432.)
C.Resolution No. 5433 (Gaub)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to accept and expend Federal Grant F unds and execute an agreement with the
Washington State Department of Transportation for the A uburn Way South
I mprovements – Hemlock S treet S E to Poplar S treet S E
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5433.)
D.Resolution No. 5435 (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, approving the 2019
Comprehensive S olid Waste Management P lan for the K ing County Solid Waste
S ystem
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5435.)
E .Resolution No. 5436 (Gaub)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to accept additional F ederal grant funds to be administered through the
Washington State Department of Transportation for C P1819 - A S treet S E
P reservation P roject
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5436.)
F.Resolution No. 5437 (Hinman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to execute an interlocal agreement between the City of A uburn and the A uburn
S chool District for mutual aid during emergencies
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5437.)
G.Resolution No. 5439 (Gaub)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the City
to apply for and, if awarded, to accept and expend grant funds in the amount of up to
$2,700,000.00 from the F ederal Aviation Administration related to the A uburn Municipal
A irport Runway E nhancement P roject
(RE C O M M E ND E D AC T I O N: M ove to adopt Resolution No. 5439.)
X I I .M AY O R AND C O UNC I L M E M B E R RE P O RT S
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated with
their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations.
A .From the Council
B .From the M ayor
Page 3 of 245
X I I I .AD J O URNM E NT
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
Page 4 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Hearing for Right-of-Way Vacation V1-18 (Gaub)
Date:
May 13, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
No Attachments Av ailable
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council to hold a Public Hearing in consideration of Right-of-Way Vacation V1-18. For
further action on this item see Ordinance No. 6687 and Resolution 5378.
Background Summary:
Per Auburn City Code Chapter 12.48 a public hearing shall be held to consider the proposed
right-of-way vacation for V1-18 for a 60 foot section of unopened right-of-way in the vicinity
SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South and a 30 foot section of
unopened right-of-way in the vicinity of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th Street. The date
of the public hearing was set by Resolution No. 5377 on May 20, 2019.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:PH.1
Page 5 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Hearing for 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Plan
(Gaub)
Date:
June 10, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
No Attachments Av ailable
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council to hold a public hearing in consideration of adoption of the 2020-2025
Transportation Improvement. See Resolution No. 5432 for further action on this item.
Background Summary:
The S ix-Year Transportation I mprovement P rogram (T I P ) is required to be amended annually
as required by R C W 35.77.010 by J une 30. T he primary importance of the T I P is that, in
most instances, projects must be included on the T I P to be eligible for state and federal grant
programs. T he T I P identifies secured or reasonably expected revenues and expenditures for
each of the projects included in the T I P. Typically, projects listed in the f irst three years of the
document are shown as having secured f unding while projects in years 4, 5, and 6 can be
partially or completely un-funded.
The T I P is a multiyear planning tool and document f or the near term development of
transportation f acilities within the City and does not represent a financial commitment by the
City. Once the T I P is approved, projects are budgeted and funded through the City’s biennial
budget. T he T I P sets priorities f or the acquisition of project f unding and is a prerequisite of
most grant programs. S taf f also uses the T I P to coordinate f uture transportation projects with
needed utility improvements.
PRELIMINARY SUM MARY OF PROPOSED AMENDM ENT S T O T HE T IP
Deletions: The following projects are planned to be removed from the updated TIP:
T I P N-10: A S treet S E Pedestrian C rossing I mprovements ($5.55M) – T he need and
approach f or pedestrian connectivity between A S treet S E and S kinner R oad will be re-
evaluated with the A Street SE corridor study (S-5).
T I P P -3: Arterial Crack S eal ($0.1M) – T he scope and f unding f or this project is being
consolidated with the A rterial Street P reservation P rogram to provide f lexibility in street
preservation approaches (P-1).
Page 6 of 245
T I P P -9: A S treet S E P reservation (E Main St to 17th S t S E) ($1.74 M) – W ill be
completed in 2019
T I P S -3: A S treet S E/L akeland Hills Way S E I ntersection Study ($0.05M) – T he scope
of this project is proposed to be combined with the A S treet S E corridor study (which
now becomes S-3).
T I P S -4: K ersey Way S E C orridor Study ($0.02M) – P edestrian f acilities on Kersey
Way will be provided with development activities as they occur. A C ity project to
connect any remaining gaps may be considered in the future.
Additions: The following projects are proposed to be added to the updated TIP:
T I P R-26: E Valley Highway W idening – T he project will complete the build-out of E
Valley Hwy between Lakeland Hills Way and Terrace View Drive SE.
T I P R -27: L ea Hill R oad S egment 1A (Harvey R d/M St NE to 105th P l S E) – the project
is proposed to be split into a P hase A and a P hase B. T he scope of P hase A will be to
create a new east/west connection between Garden Avenue and 104th Ave S E and cul-
de-sac Garden Avenue at 8th Street NE.
Other M odifications:
Other changes proposed to be made as part of the annual update are to revise certain project
descriptions, cost estimates, and anticipated funding sources to be more representative of
project scopes and available funding sources.
The date of the public hearing was set by consent on June 3, 2019.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:PH.2
Page 7 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the June 3, 2019 Regular Council Meeting
Date:
June 13, 2019
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
06-03-2019 Minutes
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.A
Page 8 of 245
City Council Meeting
J une 3, 2019 - 7:00 P M
City Hall Council Chambers
MINUT E S
Watch the meeting L I V E !
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I .C AL L T O O RD E R
A .P ledge of Allegiance
Mayor Nancy Backus called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the
Council Chambers of A uburn City Hall, 25 West Main S treet in Auburn
and led those in attendance in the P ledge of A llegiance.
B .Roll Call
Councilmembers present: L arry B rown, Claude DaCorsi, J ohn Holman and
Yolanda Trout-Manuel. Councilmember DaCorsi participated via telephone.
Deputy Mayor Bill P eloza and Councilmember B ob Baggett were
excused.
Mayor Nancy Backus and the following department directors and staff
members were present: City Attorney Steve Gross, Director of P ublic
Works I ngrid Gaub, Director of Community Development J eff Tate,
Director of F inance S helley Coleman, Director of I nnovation and
Technology David Travis, P olice Chief B ill Pierson, A ssistant Police Chief
Mark Caillier, Police Commander Dan O'Neil, Officer Devin Nelson,
S ergeant Brandon S keen, Officer Brian Anderson Detective David
L ind and City Clerk S hawn Campbell.
I I .ANNO UNC E M E NT S, P RO C L AM AT IO NS, AND P RE S E NTAT I O NS
A .Green River College
Mayor Backus thanked the Phi Theta K appa Honor S ociety Chapter at
Green River College for their hard work and dedication with cleaning
up graffiti in the City of A uburn.
P resident of Green River College Dr. S uzanne J ohnson and Phi Theta
K appa A dvisor and Development Specialist for the Green River College
Foundation Megan Evans, thanked the Mayor and Council for
acknowledging the Phi Theta K appa Honor S ociety. Dr. J ohnson
discussed how the students go out each month to clean and cover up
graffiti using supplies provided by the City Code Enforcement division, as
Page 1 of 7Page 9 of 245
well as supplies that they have raised funds for on their own time.
The students and officers being recognized included: Vice P resident of
S ervice K ayla L awrence, 2020 S ecretary J ustin Hardy, 2020 Vice
P resident of Service Eva O'Neil, 2020 President Radi A kbar and Chapter
Members: Vicki Freelund, J ennifer Gile, Samantha Railsback and Minh
A nh Huynh.
B .P olice Presentation (Pierson)
Chief Pierson presented Officer Devin Nelson with the L ifesaving Award
for his efforts and work that saved a mans life after a motorcycle accident.
Chief Pierson presented Sergeant Brandon S keen, Officer Brian
A nderson and Detective David L ind the Medal of Merit for their work and
dedication to keeping the residents safe during and after a hostage
situation.
I I I .AG E ND A M O D I F IC AT I O NS
Mayor Backus added a Presentation for the Green River College students.
I V.C IT IZE N I NP UT, P UB L I C HE ARI NG S AND C O RRE S P O ND E NC E
A .P ublic Hearings
1.Public Hearing for Right-of-Way Vacation V 3-18
Mayor B ackus opened the public hearing at 7:18 p.m.
Michael Chin with Makenzie Group
Mr. Chin stated he supports the decision of staff and hopes Council
will approve the vacation.
T here being no one else to speak Mayor Backus closed the public
hearing at 7:19 p.m.
B .Audience Participation
This is the place on the agenda where the public is invited to speak to the City
Council on any issue. Those wishing to speak are reminded to sign in on the form
provided.
Mary Miller, 1802 I Street NE , Auburn
Ms. Miller stated people have started setting off fireworks. S he reminded
people to watch out for the neighborhood pets and to make sure their pets
are also licensed.
B ob Z immerman, 33029 46th Place S, A uburn
Mr. Z immerman stated the City has recently installed new public art
and questioned the safety of that art. Mr. Z immerman also questioned when
the City enforces codes and regulations.
Page 2 of 7Page 10 of 245
Crystal Fisher, 2805 V Court S E, A uburn
Ms. Fisher stated she received a code violation regarding a basketball
hoop in front of her home. S he noted many other people in her
neighborhood have the same type of basketball hoop. S he questioned why
her home was singled out.
C.Correspondence
There was no correspondence for Council to review.
V.C O UNC I L AD HO C C O M M IT T E E RE P O RT S
Council Ad Hoc Committee Chairs may report on the status of their ad hoc Council
Committees' progress on assigned tasks and may give their recommendation to the
City Council, if any.
1.F inance Ad Hoc Committee (Chair Wales)
Councilmember Wales, chair of the Finance ad hoc committee,
report she and Councilmember DaCorsi have reviewed the claims
and payroll vouchers described on the Consent Agenda this evening
and recommended their approval.
V I .C O NS E NT AG E ND A
All matters listed on the Consent Agenda are considered by the City Council to be
routine and will be enacted by one motion in the form listed.
A .Minutes of the May 20, 2019 City Council Meeting
B .Minutes of the May 28, 2019 Study Session
C.Claims Vouchers (Coleman)
Claims voucher list dated J une 3, 2019 which includes voucher numbers 453830
through 453831 and voucher 453833 through 453988 in the amount of $2,376,289.13
and four wire transfers in the amount of $778,234.36.
Claims voucher list dated J une 3, 2019 which includes voucher number 453832 in the
amount of $203,572.32.
D.P ayroll Vouchers (Coleman)
P ayroll check numbers 538461 through 538476 in the amount of $582,868.89,
electronic deposit transmissions in the amount of $2,023,724.74 for a grand total of
$2,606,593.63 for the period covering May 16, 2019 to May 29, 2019.
E .S et Public Hearing for the Transportation I mprovement
P rogram (T I P) (Gaub)
Page 3 of 7Page 11 of 245
City Council to set a public hearing for the 2020-2025 S ix-Year Transportation
I mprovement P rogram (T I P) to be held on J une 17th, 2019 during the City Council
Meeting.
F.P ublic Works P roject No. C P 1804 (Gaub)
City Council to approve Change Order No. 1 in the amount not to exceed $15,000.00
to Contract No. 19-06 for work on P roject No. C P 1804, Auburn Way North Sidewalk
I mprovement P roject
G.P ublic Works P roject No. C P 1819 (Gaub)
City Council to award Contract No. 19-02, to P ivetta Brothers Construction, I nc. on
their low bid of $2,246,320.55 plus Washington S tate sales tax of $43,374.44 for a
total contract price of $2,289,694.99 for Project No. C P1819, A S treet S E
P reservation
Councilmember Wales moved and Councilmember Holman seconded to
approve the consent agenda.
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
V I I .UNF INIS HE D B US I NE S S
There was no unfinished business.
V I I I .NE W B US I NE S S
There was no new business.
I X.O RD INANC E S
A .Ordinance No. 6715 (Gaub)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, granting to
Fatbeam, L L C, a Washington L imited L iability Company, a franchise for
telecommunications and related services
Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Brown seconded to
approve Ordinance No. 6715.
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
B .Ordinance No. 6717 (Gaub)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn Washington, vacating right-of-
way of a portion of B S treet S E, South of 2nd Street S E , within the City of Auburn,
Washington
Councilmember B rown moved and Councilmember Trout-Manuel
seconded to approve Ordinance No. 6717.
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
Page 4 of 7Page 12 of 245
X .RE S O L UT IO NS
A .Resolution No. 5425 (Hinman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, declaring
a certain parcel of real property as surplus and authorizing the Mayor to execute a
P urchase Agreement conveying the property
Councilmember Wales moved and Councilmember Trout-Manuel
seconded to approve Resolution No. 5425.
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
B .Resolution No 5427 (Martinson)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, authorizing the
Mayor to execute and administer an agreement between the City of A uburn and Racial
E quity Consulting Group for racial equity training and policy development
Councilmember Trout-Manuel moved and Councilmember Brown
seconded to approve Resolution No. 5427.
Councilmember Wales stated there will be a new group of
Councilmembers in the next election. S he recommended waiting until the
new Council has been elected to bring this agreement forward. S he
indicated the forty hours for training seems excessive, the scope of the
agreement is too narrow, that the budget needed for this could be used on
other items and stated that the City Attorney, A ssistant City A ttorney or the
HR Director should be able to offer this type of training.
Councilmember Holman read an article from the Auburn Examiner and
then stated that the cost of this contract is more important than the small
amount of roads that the funds could fix. He believes this contract is a step
in the right direction.
Councilmember B rown stated it is time for the Council to take action on this
Resolution. He stated racism is not new and that Council needs to act in
order to build the type of community the Council and residents of A uburn
want.
Councilmember Trout-Manuel stated this is a very important topic and
needs to be addressed.
Councilmember DaCorsi thanked Director Martinson for her presentation at
the last Council S tudy S ession. He does not believe this agreement goes
far enough. He also has a concern regarding the funds required for the
agreement and believes this should wait for the full Council to be present
before taking any action.
Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Brown seconded to
postpone Resolution No. 5427 to the J uly 15, 2019 Council Meeting.
Page 5 of 7Page 13 of 245
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
Mayor Backus stated the title of the agreement is Racial Equity and I mplicit
B ias. This agreement covers all of the items and concerns that the
Councilmembers brought forward. S he hopes that when this is brought
forward next time the council will move it forward.
C.Resolution No. 5430 (Coleman)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, supporting
submitting a countywide ballot proposition to the voters for funding the Medic
One/E mergency Medical S ervices (E MS ) levy for the period from J anuary 1, 2020,
through December 31, 2025, pursuant to R C W 84.52.069
Councilmember Holman moved and Councilmember Trout-Manuel
seconded to adopt Resolution No. 5430.
Mayor Backus noted this resolution simply supports the submittal of the
item on the ballot.
MO T I O N C A R R I E D UNA NI MO US LY. 5-0
X I .M AY O R AND C O UNC I L M E M B E R RE P O RT S
At this time the Mayor and City Council may report on significant items associated with
their appointed positions on federal, state, regional and local organizations.
A .From the Council
Councilmember Trout-Manuel reported she attended the Regional L aw
and J ustice Committee meeting, met with L aura Westingaurd from Work
S ource for mock interviews, the dedication of the Crow at L es Gove Park
and the opening day of A uburn Farmers Market.
Councilmember DaCorsi thanked the Council for allowing him to attend via
phone.
B .From the M ayor
Mayor Backus reported she spoke at the E van S chool, attended
the electric vehicle ribbon cutting, a memorial for Marie P etersen, the
swearing in of two police officers, celebration of the Marshallese 40th
Constitution Day celebration, Memorial Day remembrances, the Crow with
Fries L anding, an E agle Scout Ceremony and opening day of the A uburn
I nternational Farmers Market.
X I I .E X E C UT IV E S E S S I O N
1.Executive Session
Mayor Backus recessed into executive session at 8:18 p.m. for 20
minutes pursuant to R C W 42.30.110 (1)(2) for potential litigation. City
Page 6 of 7Page 14 of 245
A ttorney Gross and Chief Pierson attended the executive session.
Mayor Backus reconvened at 8:35 p.m.
X I I I .AD J O URNM E NT
There being no further business to come before the Council, the meeting
was adjourned at 8:35 p.m.
A P P R O V E D this 17th day of J une, 2019.
________________________ ____________________________
NA NC Y B A C K US, MAYO R Shawn Campbell, City Clerk
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
Page 7 of 7Page 15 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Minutes of the May 13, 2019 and June 10, 2019 Study
Sessions
Date:
June 13, 2019
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
05-13-2019 Minutes
06-13-2019 Minutes
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Background Summary:
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.B
Page 16 of 245
City Council Study Session P W C D S FA
May 13, 2019 - 5:30 P M
City Hall Council Chambers
MINUT E S
Watch the meeting L IV E!
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I .C A L L TO O R D E R
Deputy Mayor Peloza called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street in A uburn.
A .Roll Call
Councilmembers present: Deputy Mayor Bill P eloza, Councilmember Bob
B aggett, J ohn Holman, Yolanda Trout-Manuel and L argo Wales.
Councilmembers L arry B rown and Claude DaCorsi were excused.
Mayor Nancy Backus and the following department directors and staff
members were present: City Attorney Steve Gross, Director of P ublic
Works I ngrid Gaub, Capital and Construction Engineering Manager Ryan
Vondrak, S treet Systems Engineer J ai Carter, Right-of-Way S pecialist
A mber Price, Director of F inance S helley Coleman, I nnovation and
Technology Director David Travis, Director of Administration Dana
Hinman, Director of Community Development J eff Tate, Planning
S ervices Manager J eff Dixon, Planner I I Alexandria Teague, Development
S ervices Manager J ason K rum, Director of Parks, Arts and Recreation
Daryl F aber, Special E vents Coordinator Kjerstin L ange, Cemetery
S upervisor Craig Hudson, P olice Commander J amie Douglas and City
Clerk S hawn Campbell.
I I .A NNO UNC E ME NT S , R E P O RT S , A ND P R E S E NTAT I O NS
A .J unior City Council National L eague of Cities Presentation (Hinman)
Director Hinman called J unior City Councilmember J onathan L uanga and
Coordinator L ange to present to Council on the J unior City Council's trip
to the National L eague of Cities Conference in Washington D C.
Member J onathan shared ideas that were presented among the youth at
the Conference.
Council discussed what Member L augga found inspirational at the
conference and other issues that the J unior City Council is looking to
implement.
Page 1 of 5Page 17 of 245
Coordinator L ange shared her perspective on the opportunity for the
J unior City Council.
I I I .A G E ND A I T E MS F O R C O UNC I L D I S C US S I O N
A .S outh King Housing and Homelessness Partners (S K HHP ) (Coleman)
Director Coleman presented Council with updated materials including
Ordinance No. 6719.
Director Coleman explained the City of Auburn will be the administrative
agency for S outh King Housing and Homelessness Patterns (S K HHP).
The funds to support the S K HHP employees will come from each
member of the partnership and the City of A uburn will need to create a
separate fund to pay the S K HHP employees.
Council discussed the employees designated by the interlocal agreement,
the physical location of the new staff, the change lines in the budget and
services provided to Auburn.
B .Ordinance No 6718 (Gross)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, relating to
administrative fees, amending S ections 5.10.030 and 13.06.511, and Chapters 20.06,
20.08, and 20.10 of the Auburn City Code
City Attorney Gross explained he would discuss Ordinance No. 6718 and
Resolution No. 5424 at the same time. He explained the change would
take charges out of the City Code and place them in the Auburn F ee
S chedule. Most of the changes are housekeeping items with the exception
of the A uburn Municipal Airport proposed change of charging first and last
month rent to only charging first months rent.
Deputy Mayor Peloza called for a 5 minute recess at 5:57 p.m. the
meeting was reconvened at 6:04 p.m.
C.Resolution No. 5424 (Gross)
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, A mending the
City's Fee S chedule
S ee I tem B - Ordinance No. 6718.
I V.P UB L I C W O R K S A ND C O MMUNI T Y D E V E L O P ME NT D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
A .Ordinance No. 6716 (Tate)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, relating to a new
land use category for emergency wireless communication facilities, amending S ections
18.04.912, 18.31.100, 18.35.030, of the Auburn City Code
Councilmember B aggett presided over the Public Works and Community
Development section of the meeting.
Page 2 of 5Page 18 of 245
P lanner Teague provided Council with a presentation of Ordinance No.
6716.
Council discussed the location and height of the tower, comments from the
aviation community, the lighting and the esthetics of the tower, concerns for
the property owner, dangers of the tower falling on neighboring property
and the design standards for a tower.
B .J oint Meeting with P lanning Commission
Roundtable discussion between Planning Commission & City Council
Mayor Backus called the Special Meeting to order at 6:31 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Deputy Mayor Bill P eloza, Councilmember Bob
B aggett, J ohn Holman, Yolanda Trout-Manuel and L argo Wales.
Councilmembers L arry B rown and Claude DaCorsi were excused.
P lanning Commission Members present: Chair J udi Roland, Vice Chair
Roger L ee, Commissioners J oan Mason, S uil Khanal and Dimitri
Moutzouris. Commissioner Phillip Stephens was excused.
Director Tate provided information on the purpose of the Planning
Commission.
Commissioners requested information from Council regarding their
preference on downtown parking and the process for information
dissemination. The Commissioners shared concerns relating to traffic and
parking, traffic coming from L ea Hill to the downtown area, safety in the
downtown area, traffic on Auburn Way S outh when there is an event past
the Muckleshoot,
shoreline management, critical areas and compressive plan amendments.
The Commissioners expressed their appreciation of the Planning Division
for the service they provide to the Planning Commission.
Council discussed the transition of the City through the years, parking in
downtown, urban density, the fact that expansion falls behind growth and
the quality of life for A uburn residents.
Council thanked the Planning Commission for their work and dedication to
the City.
The Planning Commission requested to meet more often and thanked the
Council for their support.
Vice Chair Baggett called for at 10 minute recess at 7:05 p.m.
The meeting reconvened at 7:15 p.m.
C.Right-of-Way Vacation #V1-18 (Gaub)
Right-of-Way Vacation #V1-18 for Mountain View Cemetery
Page 3 of 5Page 19 of 245
Director Gaub, S pecialist P rice and S upervisor Hudson presented Council
with the proposed Right-of-Way Vacation V1-18 located at the Mountain
View Cemetery.
Council discussed the area of the right of way and the purpose of the right
of way.
D.Ordinance No. 6717 (Gaub)
An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Auburn Washington,
vacating right-of -way of a portion of B Street S E , south of 2n d S treet S E,
within the City of A uburn, Washington
S pecialist P rice presented Council with Ordinance No. 6717 concerning
the proposed Right-of-Way V3-18.
E .Ordinance No. 6715 (Gaub)
A n Ordinance of the City Council of the City of A uburn, Washington, granting to
Fatbeam, L L C, a Washington L imited L iability Company, a franchise for
telecommunications and related services
S pecialist P rice presented Council with Ordinance No. 6715 regarding a
Franchise agreement with Fatbeam L L C for telecommunications services.
Council discussed the similarities with other fiber optic franchise
agreements and consideration of requiring access to F atbeam L L C's fiber
optics.
F.Capital P rojects S tatus Report (Gaub)
Manager Vondrak and E ngineer Carter presented Council with the Capital
P rojects S tatus Report including the active projects, the upcoming
construction projects, projects on suspension, and the featured capital
project - 2019 sewer repair and replacement project.
Council discussed the technology for the cure in place pipe, the right of
way limitations, information to the homeowners, the timeframe for the
project and the sidewalk project on Auburn Way S outh.
V.O T HE R D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
There were no other discussion items.
V I .NE W B US I NE S S
Deputy Mayor presided over the remainder of the meeting.
Mayor Backus requested Council's direction on the time assigned to each
item on the S tudy S ession agendas. S he stated staff has been asked to
estimate the amount of time each item will require including presentation and
discussion by Council.
Page 4 of 5Page 20 of 245
Council discussed the difficulty of requiring a time including Council questions,
the times are estimates, times remind Council to be concise, requiring Council
wait to ask questions until after the presentation. T he consensus of the Council
was to have time on the agenda for staff presentations only.
V I I .MAT R I X
A .Matrix
Council discussed the Matrix, no changes were made.
V I I I .A D J O UR NME NT
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m.
A P P R O V E D this 17rd day of J une, 2019.
_____________________________ ____________________________
B I L L P E L O Z A , D E P UT Y MAYO R S hawn Campbell, City Clerk
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
Page 5 of 5Page 21 of 245
City Council Study Session Community
Wellness Special F ocus Area
J une 10, 2019 - 5:30 P M
City Hall Council Chambers
MINUT E S
Watch the meeting L I V E !
Watch the meeting video
Meeting videos are not available until 72
hours after the meeting has concluded.
I .C A L L TO O R D E R
Deputy Mayor Peloza called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Council
Chambers of Auburn City Hall, 25 West Main Street in A uburn.
A .Roll Call
Councilmembers present: Deputy Mayor Bill P eloza, Bob B aggett, L arry
B rown, Claude DaCorsi, J ohn Holman and Yolanda Trout-Manuel.
Councilmember L argo Wales was excused.
Mayor Nancy Backus and the following department directors and staff
members were present: Assistant City Attorney Kendra Comeau, Director
of P ublic Works I ngrid Gaub, Director of Finance Shelley Coleman,
Director of Human Resources and Risk Management Candis Martinson,
I nnovation and Technology Director David Travis, Customer Care
Manager Brenda Goodson-Moore, Solid Waste and Recycling Superior
J oan Nelson, Police Chief Bill P ierson and City Clerk Shawn Campbell.
I I .A NNO UNC E ME NT S R E P O RT S A ND P R E S E NTAT I O NS
A .Racial E quity and I mplicit B ias Presentation (Martinson) (30 Minutes)
Dr. Alan S picciati, S uperintendent, A uburn S chool District
Denise Daniels, Assistant Director of Equity, Outreach, and Engagement, Auburn
S chool District
Director Hinman introduced Denise Daniels and Deanna K ilga from the
A uburn S chool District.
Ms. Daniels and Ms. Kilga shared the gaps and challenges the A uburn
S chool District had relating to equitable outcomes for all students. They
discussed the outreach to students and families and outcomes achieved.
The School District strives to ensure the various data collected is used to
make the outcomes and polices support the needs of the students and
their families. The School District has developed ways to support staff to
better connect with students of color, address barriers to success, work
with the equity policy, attend training on systemic racism and have the
ability to have conversations about race.
Page 1 of 4Page 22 of 245
Councilmember B rown talked about acknowledging that often
times inequity is not intentional but if people are willing to learn what
they don't know and are willing to continue to learn and work on issues it will
make A uburn a better community for everyone.
Councilmember DaCorsi asked how the training is implemented and how
the school district is measuring success. Ms. Daniels stated she is a
trainer and they have also brought in cohorts to supplement their training.
S he said more children have been eligible to the Advanced P lacement
classes and the achievement gaps have began to close.
Ms. Daniels stated not everyone is willing to participate but the District's
expectation is that everyone will adhere to policy.
Councilmember B aggett asked if they have had any feedback from the
families. Ms. Daniels stated there are some parents that are not supportive
but for the most part the families are in agreement with the program. She
said it is important for this to go beyond the school district. I t is important
for the student's and families to see this is a value for the whole City.
Councilmember Holman talked about the advantage of having a consultant
to help facilitate hard discussions.
Deputy Mayor Peloza asked how involved the School B oard is in the
training. Ms. Daniels stated the School B oard has been involved since the
beginning and there are two Board Members on the C O R E
Team. S he emphasized this is not a program, it is a culture shift, a shift in
how the S chool District does business.
Mayor Backus stated there is more than one way start this type of journey.
The City needs to start the working on this now to ensure equity for all
residents of A uburn. She stated the proposed agreement is not only for
training it will also help develop strategies and polices.
Directors shared areas in their departments that they believe would benefit
from a review for equity and what it could mean to their department.
I I I .A G E ND A I T E MS F O R C O UNC I L D I S C US S I O N
A .2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (Coleman) (20 Minutes)
Director Coleman stated the City will need to pass a resolution adopting
the 2019 Comprehensive S olid Waste Management P lan.
P at Mc L aughlin from K ing County stated the 2019 Comprehensive S olid
Waste plan was developed with assistance of most cities within
K ing County. He stated this is a pubic/private partnership between the
cities, K ing County and private companies. T he Comprehensive P lan is
required by Washington State law. He reviewed the steps for the
Page 2 of 4Page 23 of 245
development and adoption of the plan, the planning elements, the key
policy recommendations, and how the plan protects the employees,
the public and the environment. He provided Council with a timeline for the
final adoption of the P lan.
B .Right-of-Way Vacation #V1-18 (Gaub) (15 Minutes)
Director Gaub and Specialist Price presented Council with Right-of Way
Vacation V1-18 at the Mountainview Cemetery. T hey reviewed why the
vacation is being proposed and where the proposed new right-of-way
dedication would be located. A t this point there has not been a formal
application for a development. There have only been informal discussions
regarding a development.
Council discussed the value of the property and the steepness of the
slope to access the adjacent property. S pecialist P rice stated since the
City owns both properties there would not be a payment for the vacation.
C.E mergency Management Update (Gaub) (15 Minutes)
A n update to the City Council from the E mergency Management Division.
Director Hinman introduced Manager T horson and Specialist Turner from
E mergency Management. They provided Council and overview of the
E mergency Management Division. T he day to day duties, including
creating disaster plans, mitigation plans and training. They also help with
events, community outreach, training community teams, working with
neighboring jurisdictions and school districts to ensure the various entities
are ready to work together in an emergencies. One of the
current projects is working with the American Red Cross on sheltering
management plan and training.
I V.C O MMUNI T Y W E L L NE S S D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
A .2019 L egislative A ctions - Housing and Human S ervices (Tate) (10 Minutes)
A brief overview of key legislation that was passed during the 2019 Washington S tate
L egislative S ession.
Councilmember Trout-Manual presided over this section of the meeting.
Director Tate reviewed the new L egislation that affects the City from the
last Washington State L egislative Session, including increasing funds for
affordable housing, the funds for Affordable and S upportive Housing from
the existing L ocal S ales and Use Tax, changes to the landlord tenant act,
extending the rental increase notice requirements, elimination of the
temporary assistance period for needy families when they first move into
the State and removing restrictions on access to the Working Connections
Child Care program.
B .Community Needs A ssessment P resentation (Tate) (15 Minutes)
A presentation from Cloudburst Consulting Group on their upcoming effort to conduct
an A uburn Community Needs A ssessment.
Page 3 of 4Page 24 of 245
This items was taken after I tem I I I .A on the agenda.
Councilmember Trout-Manuel presided over this item.
Director Tate introduced consultants from Cloud Burst, J oel Warren and
J ulie McF arland. Mr. Warren explained the role of the consultant in this
contract is to help cities plan for future projects and policies using
Community Development B lock Grant F unds. He explained the scope of
the project, including the quantitative analysis, community engagement,
integration of the data collected and final documentation that will be
presented to the City. T he bulk of the project will take place from J une to
A ugust 2019 with an initial report to Council in S eptember of 2019.
Council encouraged them to reach out to the local non-profits to ensure
they look at the data with a diversity focus.
V.O T HE R D I S C US S I O N I T E MS
There were no other discussion items.
V I .NE W B US I NE S S
There was no new business.
V I I .MAT R I X
A .Matrix
Council discussed the Matrix, they requested I tem 3 - E mergency
Management Training be removed and they discussed the Blue Ribbon
Committees request for several resolutions from Council. Mayor B ackus
stated she would ask staff about the resolutions.
V I I I .A D J O UR NME NT
There being no further discussion, the meeting was adjourned at 8:27 p.m.
A P P R O V E D this 17th day of J une, 2019.
_____________________________ ____________________________
B I L L P E L O Z A , D E P UT Y MAYO R S hawn Campbell, City Clerk
Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website
(http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review
at the City Clerk's Office.
Page 4 of 4Page 25 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Claims Vouchers (Coleman)
Date:
June 12, 2019
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
No Attachments Av ailable
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Approve Claims Vouchers
Background Summary:
Claims voucher list dated June 17, 2019 which includes voucher No. 453989 through
454199, in the amount of $4,980,929.04 and 3 wire transfers in the amount of $502,375.86.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.C
Page 26 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Payroll Vouchers (Coleman)
Date:
June 12, 2019
Department:
City Council
Attachments:
No Attachments Av ailable
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Approve Payroll Vouchers
Background Summary:
Payroll check numbers 538477 through 538496 in the amount of $242,613.37, electronic
deposit transmissions in the amount of $2,102,351.41 for a grand total of $2,344,964.78 for
the period covering 5/30/2019 to 6/12/2019.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.D
Page 27 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Setting Public Hearing Date for Franchise Agreement No.
FRN19-0012 for Comcast (Gaub)
Date:
June 10, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Draft Res olution No. 5431
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council sets the date of the Public Hearing for Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0012
for Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast Cable Communications
Management, LLC.
Background Summary:
Staff recommends that the City Council set the date of the public hearing for Franchise
Agreement No. FRN19-0012 for Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast Cable
Communications Management, LLC for July 15, 2019 at 7:00 pm in Council Chambers.
Chapter 13.36.050 of the Auburn City Code (“ACC”) requires City Council to conduct a
public hearing prior to granting or denying a Cable Franchise Agreement.
Comcast seeks a 10 year Franchise. Comcast has operated in the City under a franchise
since 2002 and as various preceding parent companies since 1978. It has applied to renew
its franchise. The new agreement updates terms to comply with current federal law and
regulations. Comcast continues to provide three Public, Education, and Government (“PEG”)
Channels, the equipment for which is paid for by a $.35 per subscriber per month fee. (The
City remains responsible for the cost of programming). Comcast continues to provide basic
cable services without charge to public entities including schools, libraries, fire stations, and
City buildings, It also continues to provide a 30% discount from the Basic Service charge for
low-income, disabled, and senior customers.
Draft Resolution No. 5431 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0012 is attached as back up
documentation.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.E
Page 28 of 245
Page 29 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 1 of 49
RESOLUTION NO. 5431
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF AUBURN AND COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS, LLC AND COMCAST CABLE
COMMUNICATIONS MANAGEMENT, LLC, A
PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION
WHEREAS, Comcast Cable Communications, LLC & Comcast Cable
Communications Management, LLC (“Comcast”) has applied to the City of Auburn (“City”)
for renewal of a non-exclusive Franchise for the right of entry, use, and occupation of
certain public right(s)-of-way within the City, expressly to install, construct, erect, operate,
maintain, repair, relocate and remove its facilities in, on, over, under, along and/or across
those right(s)-of-way; and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by Revised Code of Washington 35A.47.040
and Auburn City Code (ACC) 13.36.010 et seq. and ACC 20.06.010 to grant a non-
exclusive franchise for the use of public streets, bridges, or other public ways for the
transmission and distribution of electrical energy, signals and other methods of
communication, including cable telecommunications and cable television; and
WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City Council held a public hearing on
Comcast’s request for a Franchise, at which time representatives of Comcast and
interested citizens were heard in a full public proceeding affording opportunity for
comment by any and all persons desiring to be heard; and
WHEREAS, from information presented at such public hearing, and from facts and
circumstances developed or discovered through independent study and investigation, the
City Council now deems it appropriate and in the best interest of the City and its
inhabitants that the franchise be granted to Comcast.
Page 30 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 2 of 49
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN
WASHINGTON, resolves as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is authorized to execute a Cable Television Franchise
Agreement with Comcast Cable Communications, LLC and Comcast Cable
Communications Management, LLC in substantially the same form as the Agreement
attached as Exhibit A.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative
procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage and
signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 31 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 1 of 49
CABLE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT
Between the City of Auburn, Washington, and Comcast Cable Communications, LLC &
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC d/b/a Comcast.
This Cable Franchise Agreement (“Franchise”) is made and entered into by and between The City
of Auburn, Washington, a municipal corporation (City), and Comcast Cable Communications,
LLC & Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC d/b/a Comcast, a Pennsylvania
corporation (collectively, “Grantee”). The City and Grantee are sometimes referred to hereinafter
collectively as the “Parties.”
WHEREAS, the City is authorized by 47 USC § 541 et seq., RCW 35A.47.040, ACC
20.06.010 and ACC Chapter 13.36 to grant and renew nonexclusive cable franchise agreements
for the installation, operation, and maintenance of cable television systems and otherwise
regulate cable communications services within the City’s incorporated boundary; and
WHEREAS, the City has reviewed Grantee's performance under the prior franchise and the
quality of service during the prior franchise term, has identified the future cable-related needs and
interests of the City and its citizens, and has determined that Grantee's plans for operating and
maintaining its Cable System are adequate; and
WHEREAS, the public has had adequate notice and opportunity to comment on this
Franchise during a public proceeding; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and City Council has determined that is in the best interests of,
and consistent with, the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City to grant a franchise
to Grantee to use public rights-of-way for the purposes specified in this Franchise and on the
terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises made herein, and other
good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
the Parties do hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1: PRINCIPLES AND INTENT OF THE CITY
The following provisions are statements of the City's intent in entering into this Franchise, but do
not necessarily reflect Grantee's intent and shall not supplant or modify specific provisions of the
Franchise:
1.1. Ensure that Auburn stays at the forefront of cable service by keeping the Cable System up
to date with features meeting the current and future cable-related needs and interests of the
community;
1.2. Encourage the widest feasible scope and diversity of Programming and other services to all
City residents consistent with community needs and interests;
Page 32 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 2 of 49
1.3. Encourage competitive, affordable, and equal access to advanced communications services
of all kinds to residents and businesses of the City of Auburn on a non-discriminatory
basis;
1.4. Ensure that Auburn residents have the opportunity to view public, educational, and
governmental Programming;
1.5. Ensure that rates and charges for cable Programming, equipment, and services provided
over the Cable System are affordable and consistent with federal standards;
1.6. Ensure that Auburn residents receive high quality customer service;
1.7. Ensure that the City receives appropriate compensation for the use of its facilities and
property and that installation and maintenance of cable Facilities comply with all
applicable City regulations, and do not interfere with the City's legitimate use of its own
facilities and property;
1.8. Encourage competition among Cable Operators and between Cable Operators and other
providers of communications services;
1.9. Protect the City's interests and the health, safety, and welfare of its residents; and
1.10. Provide for timely mandatory Government Access to all Cable Systems in times of civil
emergency.
SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS
For the purpose of this Franchise, the following terms, phrases, and their derivations shall have
the meanings given below unless the context clearly mandates a different interpretation. Where
the context so indicates, the present tense shall imply the future tense, words in plural include the
singular, and words in singular include the plural. The word “shall” is always mandatory, not
merely directory, and the word “may” is discretionary. In the event that the meaning of any word
or phrase not defined in this Section is uncertain, the definitions contained in FCC rules and
regulations shall apply.
2.1 “Access” means the availability for Non-Commercial use by various governmental and
educational agencies, institutions, and organizations in the community, including the City
and its designees, of a particular Channel on the Cable System to distribute programming to
Subscribers, as permitted under applicable law.
A. “Educational Access” means Access where Schools are the primary users having editorial
control over programming and services.
B. “Government Access” means Access where governmental institutions or their designees
are the primary users having editorial control over programming and services.
Page 33 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 3 of 49
C. "Public Access" means Access for the public, including organizations, groups and
individuals.
2.2 “Access Channel” means any Channel or portion of a Channel on a Cable System required
by the Franchise to be set aside by the Grantee for public, education, or governmental use.
2.3 “Affiliated Entity” means, when used in connection with Grantee, any Person who owns or
controls, is owned by or controlled by, or is under common ownership or control with
Grantee.
2.4 "Basic Service" means the lowest Tier of Cable Service that includes, at a minimum, the
retransmission of local television broadcast signals.
2.5 “Cable Act” shall mean the Communications Act of 1934, including the Cable
Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Television Consumer
Protection and Competition Act of 1992, and the Telecommunications Act of 1996, any
and amendments thereto.
2.6 "Cable Operator" means any Person or group of Persons (A) who provides Cable Services
over a Cable System and directly or through one or more affiliates owns a significant
interest in such Cable System, or (B) who otherwise controls or, through any arrangement,
is responsible for the management and operation of such a Cable System.
2.7 “Cable Service” means
A. The one-way transmission to Subscribers of (1) Video Programming or (2) other
Programming service, and
B. Subscriber interaction, if any, that is required for the selection or use of such Video
Programming or other Programming service.
2.8 “Cable System” means Grantee’s Facilities within the Franchise Area, consisting of a set of
closed transmission paths and associated signal generation, reception and control
equipment that is designed to provide Cable Service, which includes Video Programming,
and which is provided to multiple Subscribers within a community, but such term does not
include:
A. A facility that serves only to retransmit the television signals of one or more television
broadcast stations;
B. A facility that serves Subscribers without using any public right-of-way;
C. A facility of a common carrier which is subject, in whole or in part, to the provisions of
Title II of the federal Communications Act (47 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.), except that such
Page 34 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 4 of 49
facility shall be considered a Cable System (other than for purposes of 47 U.S.C. 541(c))
to the extent such facility is used in the transmission of Video Programming directly to
Subscribers, unless the extent of such use is solely to provide interactive on-demand
services;
D. An open video system that complies with 47 U.S.C. § 573; or
E. Any facilities of any electric utility used solely for operating its electric utility systems.
2.9 "Channel" means a portion of the electromagnetic frequency spectrum which is used in a
Cable System and which is capable of delivering a television channel, whether delivered in
an analog or digital format.
2.10 "City Council" means the legislative body of the City of Auburn.
2.11 “Complaint” means a Subscriber’s verbal or written contact with the Grantee to express a
grievance or dissatisfaction concerning Cable Service that are not within the regulatory
control of the City and does not include issues that are promptly resolved to the
Subscriber’s satisfaction.
2.12 “Designated Access Provider” means the entity or entities designated by the City to
manage or co-manage the Access Channel and facilities, and may include the City as a
Designated Access Provider.
2.13 "Demarcation Point" means the physical point at which the Cable System enters a
Subscriber's home or building.
2.14 "Document" or "Records" means written or graphic materials, however produced or
reproduced, or any other tangible permanent documents, including those maintained by
computer or other electronic or digital means, maintained by the Grantee in the ordinary
course of conducting its business.
2.15 "Dwelling Unit" means any building, or portion thereof, that has independent living
facilities, including provisions for cooking, sanitation and sleeping, designed for residential
occupancy.
2.16 "Effective Date" means the Effective Date of this Franchise pursuant to subsection 3.4.
2.17 “Facility” means any distribution or component of the Cable System.
2.18 "FCC" means the Federal Communications Commission or its lawful successor.
2.19 "Franchise Area" means the area within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City, including
any areas annexed by the City during the term of this Franchise.
Page 35 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 5 of 49
2.20 "Franchise Fee" means consideration paid by Grantee for the privilege to construct and/or
operate a Cable System in the Franchise Area as set forth in accordance with Section 622
of the Cable Act.
2.21 "Gross Revenues" means, for purposes of Franchise Fee calculations, all revenue received
by the Grantee, in whatever form and from all sources, derived from the operation of the
Grantee’s Cable System to provide Cable Services, in the Franchise Area.
A. Gross Revenues include, by way of illustration and not limitation, monthly fees charged
to Subscribers for Cable Services, including Basic Service and all other Tiers of Cable
Service, Pay-Per-View Service, Cable Service installation, disconnection, change-in-
service and reconnection fees, Leased Access Channel fees, late fees, payments received
by Grantee from programmers for carriage of Cable Services on the Cable System and
recognized as revenue under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), revenues
from rentals of Cable System equipment such as converters, advertising revenues,
advertising sales commissions if recognized as revenue under GAAP, additional outlet
fees, Franchise Fees, and revenues from home shopping Channels.
B. Gross Revenues shall not include Bad Debt, provided that all or part of any such Bad
Debt that is written off but subsequently collected shall be included in Gross Revenues in
the period collected, or revenues received from telecommunications services.
C. Gross Revenues shall be determined without deduction for (1) any operating expense; (2)
any accrual; or (3) any other expenditure, regardless of whether such expense, accrual or
expenditure reflects a cash payment, and revenue shall be counted only once in
determining Gross Revenues.
D. Gross Revenues also does not include capital contributions, taxes on services furnished
by Grantee which are imposed directly on any Subscriber or user by the State, City or
other governmental unit and which are collected by Grantee on behalf of said
governmental unit, excluding Franchise Fees.
E. This definition shall be construed so as to include all Gross Revenues to the maximum
extent permitted by federal and State law, except to the extent specifically excluded in
this subsection, and encompasses revenues that may develop in the future, whether or not
anticipated.
F. If a statutory change in State or federal law, or a decision of the FCC or a court of
competent jurisdiction expands the categories of revenue available to the City for the
Franchise Fee assessment beyond those permitted under this definition as of the Effective
Date, that change shall automatically be included in the definition of Gross Revenues
under this Franchise, provided that the City imposes the same requirement upon any other
similarly situated multichannel video provider over which the City has jurisdiction and
authority to impose such fees.
Page 36 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 6 of 49
2.22 "Headend" means Grantee’s primary facility for signal reception and dissemination on the
Cable System, including cables, antennas, wires, satellite dishes, monitors, switchers,
modulators, processors, and other related equipment.
2.23 "Leased Access Channel" means a Channel or portion of a Channel made available by
Grantee for Programming by others for a fee.
2.24 “Liquidated Damages” means any requirement imposed on the Grantee to pay specified
sums to the City as a result of performance deficiencies and/or Franchise violations, as
described in Section 13.8.
2.25 "Non-Cable Services" means any service that is distributed over the Cable System, other
than a Cable Service.
2.26 “Normal Business Hours” means those hours during which most similar businesses in the
community are open to serve customers.
2.27 "Normal Operating Conditions" means service conditions within the control of the Grantee.
Those conditions that are not within the control of the Grantee include, but are not limited
to, natural disasters, civil disturbances, power outages, telephone network outages, and
severe or unusual-weather conditions. Those conditions that are ordinarily within the
control of the Grantee include, but are not limited to, special promotions, pay-per-view
events, rate increases, regular peak or seasonal demand periods, and maintenance or
Upgrade of the Cable System.
2.28 “Parent Corporation" means any existing or future corporation, entity, or Person with
greater than fifty percent (50%) ownership or control over Grantee.
2.29 “Pay-Per-View” service means programming offered on a per-program or per-event basis
for which a separate fee is charged.
2.30 "PEG Access" means Public Access, Educational Access, and Government Access, jointly
or severally.
2.31 "Person" means any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, trust,
corporation or governmental entity.
2.32 “Right-of-Way” or “Rights-of-Way” means the surface of, and the space above and below,
any public street, highway, freeway, bridge, land path, alley, court, boulevard, sidewalk, way,
lane, public way, drive, circle or other public Right-of-Way, including, but not limited to,
general public utility easements, or Right-of-Way dedicated for compatible uses now or
hereafter held by the City in the Franchise Area, which shall entitle the Grantee to the use
thereof for the purpose of installing, operating, repairing, upgrading and maintaining the Cable
System. Right-of-Way shall also mean any easement now or hereafter held by the City within
Page 37 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 7 of 49
the Franchise Area for the purpose of utility or public service use dedicated for compatible
uses.
2.33 “School” means an y State accredited public educational institution including, for example,
primary and secondary Schools (K-12).
2.34 “State” means the State of Washington.
2.35 “Subscriber” means any Person who lawfull y receives Cable Service provided b y
Grantee by means of the Cable System and whose premises are physically wired and
lawfull y activated to receive Cable Service from Grantee’s Cable System.
2.36 “Tier” means a group of Channels for which a separate periodic rate is charged.
2.37 “Video Programming” means programming provided b y, or generall y considered
comparable to programming provided b y television broadcast station.
SECTION 3: GRANT OF FRANCHISE
3.1 Grant of Franchise
A. The City hereby grants to Grantee a nonexclusive Franchise authorizing Grantee to
construct and operate a Cable System in, along, among, upon, across, above, over, under
or in any Right-of-Ways within the Franchise Area for the purpose to install such wires,
cables, conductors, ducts, conduits, vaults, manholes, pedestals, amplifiers, appliances,
attachments, and other related property or equipment and to use existing poles as may be
necessary or appurtenant for the deployment of Cable Services over the Cable System.
This Franchise is subject to and shall be governed by all applicable provisions now
existing or hereafter amended of federal, State and local laws and regulations, except as
specifically provided for within this Franchise.
B. This Franchise expressly authorizes Grantee to provide only Cable Services as allowed
by applicable law, and to construct, operate, or maintain Cable System facilities in the
Franchise Area. This Franchise is not a bar on Grantee’s provision of non-Cable Services.
This Franchise does not relieve Grantee of any obligation it may have to comply with any
local, state or federal requirements that lawfully apply to non-cable services.
C. This Franchise shall constitute both a right to provide the Cable Services required by, and
to fulfill the obligations set forth in, the provisions of this Franchise.
D. Grantee guarantees, as a condition of exercising the privileges granted by this Franchise,
that any Affiliated Entity of the Grantee directly involved in the offering of Cable Service
in the Franchise Area, will also comply with the obligations of this Franchise.
Page 38 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 8 of 49
E. Unless otherwise stated in this Franchise, in the event of a conflict between the Auburn
City Code and this Franchise, this Franchise shall control, and shall not be unilaterally
altered by the City through subsequent ordinance, regulation, resolution, or other
enactment of the City, except within the lawful exercise of the City’s police power.
1. Grantee acknowledges, without waiving its right to challenge any City ordinance or
regulation that conflicts with its rights under this Franchise, that its rights hereunder
are subject to the police powers of the City to adopt and enforce ordinances necessary
to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the public, and Grantee agrees to comply
with all applicable laws and ordinances enacted by the City pursuant to such power.
2. This Franchise shall not be interpreted to prevent the City from lawfully imposing
additional conditions, including additional compensation conditions for use of the
rights-of-way.
3. No rights shall pass to Grantee by implication and this Franchise shall not include,
nor be a substitute for:
a. Any other permit or authorization required for the privilege of transacting and
carrying on a business within the City that may be required by the ordinances and
laws of the City;
b. Any permit, agreement, or authorization required by the City for rights-of-way
users in connection with operation on or in rights-of-way or public property,
including, by way of example and not limitation, construction or excavation
permits; or
c. Any permits or agreements for occupying any other property of the City or private
entities to which access is not specifically granted by this Franchise including,
without limitation, permits and agreements for placing devices on poles, in
conduits or in or on other structures.
F. This Franchise is intended to convey limited rights and interests only as to those rights-
of-way in which the City has a proprietary interest, is not a warranty of title or interest in
any rights-of-way, does not provide the Grantee with any interest in any particular
location within the rights-of-way, and does not confer rights other than as expressly
provided in the grant hereof.
G. This City has granted this Franchise in reliance upon the Grantee’s business skill,
reputation, financial capacity, and character and may not be assigned, transferred,
conveyed, or otherwise encumbered without the express written consent of the City
pursuant to Section 15 of this Franchise.
3.2 Use of Rights-of-Way
Page 39 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 9 of 49
A. Any privilege claimed under this Franchise in any right-of-way shall be subordinated to
any prior lawful occupancy of the right-of-way.
B. Within parameters reasonably related to the City’s role in protecting the public health,
safety, and welfare, the City may require, through the permitting process, that the Cable
System Facilities be installed at a particular time, at a specific place, or in a particular
manner as a condition of access to a particular right-of-way and may deny access if
Grantee is not willing to comply with the City’s requirements.
3.3 Term
A. The term of this Franchise, and all rights, privileges, obligations, and restrictions
pertaining thereto, shall be ten (10) years from the Effective Date of this Franchise,
unless terminated earlier as provided herein.
B. The City and Grantee agree that any proceedings undertaken relative to the renewal of
this Franchise shall be governed by and comply with the provisions of 47 U.S.C. § 546
and applicable ACC.
C. If Grantee requests renewal of this Franchise in accordance with the provisions of Section
626 of the Cable Act prior to the expiration of its term or any extension thereof, the
Franchise automatically continues month to month until renewed or until either party
gives written notice at least one hundred eighty (180) days in advance of the intent not to
renew the Franchise.
3.4 Acceptance and Effective Date
A. This Franchise, and any rights granted hereunder, shall not become effective for any
purpose unless and until Grantee files with the City Clerk (1) the Statement of
Acceptance, Attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference, (2)
all verifications of insurance coverage specified under Section 6.3, (3) the security
specified in Section 6.4, and (4) any outstanding application fees per the City fee
schedule. These four items shall collectively be the “Franchise Acceptance.” The
Effective Date of this Franchise shall be the date upon which the City Clerk Receives the
Franchise Acceptance.
B. Should Grantee fail to file the Franchise Acceptance with the City Clerk within sixty (60)
days after this Franchise is approved by City Council, this Franchise shall be null and
void.
3.5 Franchise Nonexclusive
This Franchise shall be nonexclusive, and subject to all prior rights, interests, easements,
permits or licenses granted by the Cit y to an y Person to use an y propert y for any
purpose whatsoever, including the right of the City to use the same for any purpose it
Page 40 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 10 of 49
deems fit, including the same or similar purposes allowed Grantee hereunder, and the City
may at any time grant authorization to use the Rights-of-Way for an y purpose not
incompatible with Grantee’s authority under this Franchise and for such additional
franchises for cable systems as the City deems appropriate.
3.6 Effect of Acceptance
By accepting this Franchise, Grantee: (A) acknowledges and accepts the City’s legal right to
issue and enforce the Franchise; (B) agrees that it will not oppose the City’s intervening, to
the extent the City is legally entitled to do so, in any legal or regulatory proceeding affecting
the Cable System; (C) accepts and agrees to comply with each and every provision of this
Franchise; and (D) agrees that the Franchise was granted pursuant to processes and
procedures consistent with applicable law, and that it will not raise any claim to the contrary.
3.7 Modifications to this Franchise
A. This Franchise is subject to the lawful terms and conditions of the Auburn City Code, as
the same is now or is hereafter amended by the lawful exercise of the City’s police
powers.
B. This Franchise may be amended at any time by mutual written agreement of the parties
for any reason.
C. Competitive Equity:
1. The City reserves the right to grant additional franchises or similar authorizations to
provide Video Programming services via Cable Systems or similar wireline systems
located in the Right of Way. The City intends to treat wireline competitors in a
nondiscriminatory manner in keeping with federal law. If, following the Effective
Date of this Franchise, the City grants such an additional franchise or authorization to
use the Right of Way to provide such services and Grantee believes the City has done
so on terms materially more favorable than the obligations under this Agreement,
then the provisions of this subsection will apply.
2. As part of this Franchise, the City and Grantee have mutually agreed upon the
following terms as a condition of granting the Franchise, which terms may place the
Grantee at a significant competitive disadvantage if not required of a wireline
competitor: the Franchise Fee, PEG Access funding, PEG Access Channels, records
and reports, and customer service obligations (hereinafter “Material Obligations”).
The City and Grantee agree that these Material Obligations bear no relationship to the
technology employed by the Grantee or a wireline competitor and as such can
reasonably be expected to be applied fairly across all wireline competitors. The City
and Grantee further agree that this provision shall not require a word for word
identical franchise or authorization for competitive equity so long as the regulatory
and financial burdens on each entity are generally equivalent.
Page 41 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 11 of 49
3. Within one (1) year of the adoption of a wireline competitor’s franchise or similar
authorization, Grantee must notify the City in writing of the Material Obligations in
this Franchise that exceed the Material Obligations of the wireline competitor’s
franchise or similar authorization. The City shall have one hundred twenty (120) days
to agree to allow Grantee to adopt the same Material Obligations provided to the
wireline competitor, or dispute that the Material Obligations are different. In the event
the City disputes that the Material Obligations are different, Grantee may bring an
action in federal or State court for a determination as to whether the Material
Obligations are different and as to what Franchise amendments would be necessary to
remedy the disparity. Alternatively, Grantee may notify the City that it elects to
immediately commence the renewal process under 47 U.S.C. § 546 and to have the
remaining term of this Franchise shortened to not more than thirty (30) months.
4. Nothing in this subsection is intended to alter the rights or obligations of either party
under applicable federal or State law, and it shall only apply to the extent permitted
under applicable law and FCC orders. In no event will the City be required to refund
or to offset against future amounts due the value of benefits already received.
5. This provision does not apply if the City is ordered or required to issue a franchise on
different terms and conditions, or it is legally unable to do so; and the relief is
contingent on the new Cable Operator actually commencing provision of service in
the market to its first customer. Should the new Cable Operator fail to continuously
provide service for a period of six (6) months, the City has the right to implement this
Franchise with its original terms upon one hundred eighty (180) days’ notice to
Grantee.
6. This subsection does not apply to open video systems, nor does it apply to common
carrier systems exempted from franchise requirements pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 571;
or to systems that serve less than 5% (five percent) of the geographic area of the City;
or to systems that only provide video services via the public Internet.
SECTION 4: FRANCHISE FEES AND FINANCIAL CONTROLS
4.1. Franchise Fees
As compensation for the use of the City’s Rights-of-Way, Grantee shall pay as a Franchise
Fee to the City, throughout the duration of this Franchise, an amount equal to five percent
(5%) of Grantee’s Gross Revenues, which shall commence on the Effective Date of this
Franchise.
4.2. Payments
Page 42 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 12 of 49
Grantee’s Franchise Fee payments to the City shall be computed quarterly for the preceding
quarter. Each payment shall be due and payable no later than thirty (30) days after the end of
the preceding quarter, after which time interest will accrue. The quarters shall end
respectively on the last day of March, June, September and December.
4.3. Acceptance of Payment
No acceptance of any payment shall be construed as an accord by the City that the amount
paid is, in fact, the correct amount, nor shall any acceptance of payments be construed as a
release of any claim the City may have for further or additional sums payable or for the
performance of any other obligation of Grantee.
4.4. Franchise Fee Reports
Each payment shall be accompanied by a written report to the City, verified by an authorized
representative of Grantee, containing an accurate statement in summarized form which
includes a breakdown by category of Grantee’s Gross Revenues and the computation of the
payment amount.
4.5. Audits
A. Upon forty-five (45) days prior written notice, the City shall have the right to conduct an
annual independent audit of Grantee’s records necessarily related to the enforcement of
this Franchise and to re-compute any amounts determined to be payable under this
Franchise.
1. If Grantee cooperates in making all relevant records available to the City, the City
will attempt to complete each audit within six (6) months, and the audit period shall
be no greater than the previous three (3) years, unless the City has information
relating to previous years beyond the three (3) years which raises doubt as to the
accuracy of payments made under this or previous franchises, in which case an
additional three (3) years may be audited.
2. Any undisputed amounts due to the City as a result of the audit shall be paid within
sixty (60) days following written notice to the Grantee by the City, which notice shall
include a copy of the audit findings.
3. If the audit shows that Franchise Fees have been underpaid by five percent (5%) or
more in any calendar year, Grantee shall pay for the cost of the audit up to five
thousand dollars ($5,000) per year being audited for a maximum of 3 years.
B. If Grantee disputes all or part of the audit findings, then the parties shall meet in an
attempt to resolve the matter. If the parties are unable to resolve the matter, then either of
the parties may refer that matter to non-binding arbitration. Each party shall bear one-
Page 43 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 13 of 49
half of the costs and expenses of the arbitration proceedings. The decision of the
arbitrator(s) shall be subject to judicial review at the request of either party.
4.6. Late Payments
In the event any payment due the City is not timely made, Grantee shall pay, in addition to
the amount due, interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum from the payment due
date until the City receives the payment.
4.7. Underpayments
If a Franchise Fee underpayment is discovered as the result of an audit, Grantee shall pay, in
addition to the amount due, interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum calculated
from the date the underpayment was originally due until the date the City receives the
payment.
4.8. Maximum Franchise Fees
A. The parties acknowledge that, at present, applicable federal law limits the City to
collecting a franchise fee of five percent (5%) of Gross Revenues in a 12-month period.
B. In the event that at any time throughout the term of this Franchise, the City is authorized
to collect an amount in excess of five percent (5%) of Grantee’s Gross Revenues and the
City elects to do so, then this Franchise shall be amended by the parties consistent with
such change provided however that all other Cable Operators within the Franchise Area
are treated similarly.
C. In the event that at any time throughout the term of this Franchise, the City may only
collect an amount which is less than five percent (5%) of Grantee's Gross Revenues for
franchise fees due to a change in federal law, then this Franchise shall be amended by the
parties consistent with such change to provide for such lesser percentage.
4.9. Additional Commitments Not Franchise Fees
A. No term or condition in this Franchise shall in any way modify or affect Grantee’s
obligation to pay in full the Franchise Fee percentage listed in this Franchise. Although
the total sum of Franchise Fee payments and additional Access capital contribution
commitments set forth elsewhere in this Franchise may total more than five percent (5%)
of Grantee’s Gross Revenues in any 12-month period, Grantee agrees that the additional
Access capital contribution commitments are excluded from the definition of Franchise
Fee herein and are not Franchise Fees, nor are they to be offset or credited against any
Franchise Fee payments due to the City, nor do they represent an increase in Franchise
Fees to be passed through to Subscribers.
Page 44 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 14 of 49
B. Additionally, any security fund, performance bond or letter of credit shall not be offset
against Franchise Fees. Furthermore, the City and Grantee agree that any utility tax,
business and occupation tax or similar generally applicable tax or fee shall be in addition
to any Franchise Fees required herein and there shall be no offset against Franchise Fees
subject to applicable law.
C. If Grantee elects to offset certain non-cash commitments or initiatives against the
Franchise Fee in accordance with applicable law, Grantee will provide the City ninety
(90) days’ advance written notice, to include a detailed schedule of the amount it intends
to offset, and the cost basis for each schedule item. The City will have eighty (80) days
from receipt of Grantee’s notice to respond. The City reserves the right to terminate
Grantee’s provision of any non-cash commitments or initiatives.
4.10. Payment on Termination
A. If this Franchise is lawfully terminated, the Grantee shall file with the City within ninety
(90) days of the date of the termination, a financial statement, prepared by a certified
public accountant, or representative of the Grantee’s Controller or Chief Financial
Officer, showing the Gross Revenues received by the Grantee since the end of the
previous fiscal year.
B. Within thirty (30) days of the filing of the statement with the City, Grantee shall pay any
unpaid Franchise Fee amounts as indicated.
C. If the Grantee fails to pay its remaining financial obligations as required in this Franchise,
the City may satisfy the same by utilizing the funds from any security provided by the
Grantee.
4.11. Tax Liability
The Franchise Fees shall be in addition to any and all taxes or other levies or assessments
which are now or hereafter required to be paid by businesses in general by any law of the
City, the State or the United States including, without limitation, sales, use, utility,
occupation and other taxes, business license fees or other payments.
4.12. Bundling of Cable and Non-Cable Services
In no event will the Grantee unlawfully evade or reduce applicable Franchise Fee payments
required to be made to the City due to discounted bundled services. Customer billing shall be
itemized by service(s), and Grantee shall comply with all applicable laws regarding rates for
Cable Services and all applicable laws covering issues of cross subsidization.
Page 45 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 15 of 49
SECTION 5: ADMINISTRATION AND REGULATION
5.1. Authority
The City shall be vested with the power and right to administer and enforce the requirements
of this Franchise and the regulations and requirements of applicable law, including the Cable
Act, or to delegate that power and right, or any part thereof, to the extent permitted under
law, to any agent in the sole discretion of the City.
5.2. Rate Regulation
All rates, fees, charges, deposits and associated terms and conditions to be imposed by the
Grantee or any affiliated Person for any Cable Service as of the effective date shall be in
accordance with applicable law.
5.3. Low Income Discount
As long as the Grantee offers Basic Service, the Grantee intends to offer a discount to those
individuals who are low income (according to applicable federal guidelines) and either
permanently disabled or 65 years of age or older and who are the legal owners or tenants of
the Dwelling Unit. Such discounts will consist of thirty percent (30%) off of Basic Service
or the Basic Service portion of digital service packages when not discounted by inclusion in
other promotional or programming package rates at which time the promotional or
programming package rate will apply.
The City acknowledges that discounted services reflect a voluntary initiative on the part of
Grantee, and is not a requirement of this franchise. Subject to applicable law, should
Grantee elect to discontinue the low income discount, Grantee shall first provide the City
with ninety (90) days’ prior notice.
5.4. Performance Evaluations
A. Upon thirty (30) days written notification, the City may hold performance evaluation
sessions, no more than once every twelve months, whenever necessary to ensure proper
performance of the provisions of this Franchise.
B. All evaluation sessions shall be open to the public.
C. Topics which may be discussed at any evaluation session include, but are not limited to,
construction issues, Cable Service rate structures, Franchise Fee payments, liquidated
damages, free or discounted Cable Service, application of new technologies, Cable
System performance, Cable Services currently provided and programming offered, future
plans of Grantee for new services or programs, Subscriber Complaints, privacy,
modifications to this Franchise, judicial and FCC rulings, line extension policies and the
Page 46 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 16 of 49
City’s or Grantee’s rules; provided that nothing in this subsection shall be construed as
requiring the renegotiation of this Franchise.
D. During evaluations under this subsection, Grantee shall fully cooperate with the City and
shall provide such information and documents as the City may reasonably require to
perform the evaluation.
5.5. Leased Access Channel Rates
Grantee shall offer Leased Access Channel capacity on such terms and conditions and rates
as may be negotiated with each lessee, subject to the requirements of Section 612 of the
Cable Act. Upon request, Grantee shall provide a complete schedule of current rates and
charges for any and all Leased Access Channels or portions of such Channels provided by
Grantee.
5.6. Late Fees
For purposes of this subsection, any assessment, charge, cost, fee or sum, however
characterized, that Grantee imposes upon a Subscriber solely for late payment of a bill is a
late fee and changes in late fee rates shall be noticed to the City and applied in accordance
with applicable law.
SECTION 6: INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
6.1. Indemnification
A. Indemnity: Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its elected
officials, officers, authorized agents, boards, volunteers and employees, acting in official
capacity, from and against any liability, damages or claims, costs, expenses, settlements
or judgments arising out of, or resulting from the granting of this Franchise or Grantee’s
activities, any casualty or accident to Person or property that occurs as a result of any
construction, excavation, operation, maintenance, reconstruction, relocation, or any other
act or omission done pursuant to the terms of this Franchise, provided that the City shall
give Grantee timely written notice of its obligation to indemnify the City.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Grantee shall not indemnify the City to the extent that
any damages, liability or claims resulting from the willful misconduct, concurrent
negligence of the City, its officers, authorized agents, or employees, attorneys,
consultants, volunteers, or independent contractors for which the City is legally
responsible, or for any activity or function conducted by any Person other than Grantee in
connection with PEG Access and/or Emergency Alert System.
B. Indemnification for Relocation: Grantee shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its
elected officials, officers, authorized agents, boards, volunteers, and employees harmless
for any damages, claims, additional costs, or expenses payable by the City related to,
arising out of, or resulting from Grantee’s failure to remove, adjust or relocate any of its
Page 47 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 17 of 49
facilities in the Rights-of-Way in a timely manner in accordance with any lawful
relocation required by the City; including, but not limited to, claims for delay, damages,
costs, and/or time asserted by any contractor performing public work for or on behalf of
the City.
C. Procedures and Defense: With respect to Grantee’s indemnity obligations set forth herein,
Grantee shall provide the defense of any claims or actions brought against the City or any
other indemnified party. Nothing herein shall be deemed to prevent the City from
cooperating with Grantee and participating in the defense of any litigation by its own
counsel at its own cost and expense; provided, however, that after consultation with the
City, Grantee shall have the right to defend, settle or compromise any claim or action
arising hereunder, and Grantee shall have the authority to decide the appropriateness and
the amount of any such settlement. However, Grantee may not agree to any settlement of
claims financially affecting the City without the City’s written approval that shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
D. Duty to Give Notice: The City shall give Grantee timely written notice of any claim or of
the commencement of any action, suit or other proceeding covered by the indemnity in
this Section. The City’s failure to so notify and request indemnification shall not relieve
Grantee of any liability that Grantee might have, except to the extent that such failure
prejudices Grantee’s ability to defend such claim or suit. In the event any such claim
arises, the City or any other indemnified party shall tender the defense thereof to Grantee
and Grantee shall have the obligation and duty to defend any claims arising thereunder,
and the City shall cooperate fully therein.
E. Separate Representation: If separate representation to fully protect the interests of both
parties is necessary, such as a conflict of interest between the City and the counsel
selected by Grantee to represent the City, Grantee shall pay for the City’s selected
counsel, from the date such separate representation is required forward, all reasonable
expenses incurred by the City in defending itself with regard to any action, suit, or
proceeding indemnified by Grantee.
F. Inspection: Inspection or acceptance by the City of any work performed by Grantee at the
time of completion of construction or maintenance projects shall not be grounds for
avoidance of any of these covenants of indemnification.
6.2. Grantee’s Further Responsibilities.
A. Grantee shall indemnify and hold harmless the City from any workers’ compensation
claims to which Grantee may become subject during the Term of this Franchise. It is
further specifically and expressly understood that, solely to the extent required to enforce
the indemnification provided per this Franchise, Grantee waives its immunity under
RCW Title 51; provided, however, the foregoing waiver shall not in any way preclude
Grantee from raising such immunity as a defense against any claim brought against
Page 48 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 18 of 49
Grantee by any of its employees or other third party. This waiver has been mutually
negotiated by the parties.
B. Grantee’s indemnification obligations shall include indemnifying the City for actions
brought by Grantee’s own employees and the employees of Grantee’s agents,
representatives, contractors, and subcontractors even though Grantee may be immune
under Title 51 RCW from direct suit brought by such employee.
6.3. Insurance Requirements
A. Grantee shall maintain in full force and effect at its own cost and expense each of the
following policies of insurance or equivalent self-insurance.
B. Grantee shall maintain:
1. Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) insurance written on an occurrence form at
least as broad as ISO CG 00 01, with Minimum Limits of Liability: $5,000,000.00 per
occurrence, $5,000,000.00 premises/operations, products/completed operations
aggregate, personal/advertising inquiry liability, contractual liability, and independent
contractors liability; and shall not exclude XCU/subsidence perils or any similar
perils;
2. Automobile Liability insurance at least as broad as ISO CA 00 01 including coverage
for owned, non-owned, leased, or hired vehicles, as applicable, with a minimum limit
of $5,000,000.00 each accident for bodily injury and property damage;
3. Workers’ Compensation insurance for the State as required by Title 51, Revised Code
of Washington, Industrial Insurance, $5,000,000.00 each accident/ each disease/
policy limit employers liability/Washington stop gap; and
4. Excess or Umbrella Liability: $5,000,000 each occurrence and $5,000,000 policy
limit.
C. Additional Insured: The City its officers, employees, authorized agents, and volunteers
shall be included as an additional insured under each of the insurance policies required in
this Section except Workers’ Compensation Insurance. Except for Workers’
Compensation and employer’s liability, all insurance policies required hereunder shall
provide or be endorsed so that the City is covered as, and have the rights of, an additional
insured with respect to liability arising out of activities performed by, or on behalf of,
Grantee under this Franchise or applicable law, or in the construction, operation, upgrade,
maintenance, repair, replacement or ownership of the Cable System. Grantee shall
provide to the City either (1) a copy of an endorsement covering the City as an Additional
Insured for each insurance policy required in this Section and providing that such
insurance shall apply as primary insurance on behalf of such Additional Insureds or (2) a
copy of the blanket additional insured clause from the policies. Receipt by the City of
Page 49 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 19 of 49
any certificate showing less coverage than required is not a waiver of Grantee’s
obligations to fulfill the requirements. Grantee’s insurance coverage shall be primary
insurance with respect to the City. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the
Additional Insureds shall be in excess of Grantee’s insurance and shall not contribute to
it. Grantee’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is
made or lawsuit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.
D. Coverage: Each policy shall provide that the insurance shall not be canceled or
terminated so as to be out of compliance with these requirements without forty-five (45)
days written notice first provided to the City via mail, and thirty (30) days’ notice for
nonpayment of any premium. If the insurance is canceled or terminated so as to be out of
compliance with the requirements of this Franchise, Grantee shall provide a replacement
policy. Grantee agrees to maintain continuous uninterrupted insurance coverage, in at
least the amounts required, until all work required to be performed under the terms of this
Franchise is satisfactorily completed and, in the case of Commercial General Liability
Insurance, for at least one (1) year after expiration of this Franchise. Any failure of
Grantee to comply with the claim reporting provisions of the policy(ies) or any breach of
an insurance policy warranty shall not affect coverage afforded under the policy to
protect the City. However, if coverage is not afforded under these circumstances,
Grantee will indemnify the City for losses the City otherwise would have been covered
for as an additional insured.
E. Alternative Insurance: Grantee shall not cancel any required insurance policy without
obtaining alternative insurance in conformance with this Franchise. Each of the required
insurance policies shall be with insurers qualified to do business in the State of
Washington with a Best’s rating of no less than “A- VII.”
F. Verification of Coverage: In addition to the other requirements of this Section, Grantee
shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance reflecting at least the minimum
coverage and policy limits required hereunder. The certificates for each insurance policy
are to be on standard forms or such forms as are consistent with standard industry
practices.
G. Grantee’s policy shall not include any of the following endorsements, or their equivalent
endorsements or exclusions:
1. Contractual liability limitation (GCL Form 21 39 or equivalent),
2. Amendment of insured contract definition (CGL Form 24 26 or equivalent),
3. Limitation of coverage to designated premises or project (CGL Form 21 44 or
equivalent),
4. Any endorsement modifying or deleting the exception to the employer’s liability
exclusion,
Page 50 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 20 of 49
5. Any “Insured vs. Insured” or “cross-liability” exclusion with respect to additional
insureds, and
6. Any type of punitive, exemplary or multiplied damaged exclusion.
H. Evidence of insurance shall be in the form of a certificate of insure evidencing
compliance with these requirements.
6.4. Franchise Security
A. Grantee shall provide a performance bond, in a form acceptable to the City, in the amount
of One Hundred Fifty thousand dollars ($150,000.00) to ensure the faithful performance
of its responsibilities under this Franchise and applicable law. Grantee may be required
to obtain additional security, such as generally applicable construction bonds, in
accordance with the City’s permitting requirements. Grantee shall pay all premiums or
costs associated with maintaining the security, and shall keep the same in full force and
effect at all times and shall immediately replenish the bond upon foreclosure. Except as
expressly provided herein or as otherwise specified in the City’s construction permitting
requirements, the Grantee shall not be required to obtain or maintain other security as a
condition of being awarded the Franchise. Grantee shall not cancel the performance bond
without obtaining an alternative performance bond in conformance with this Franchise.
B. The security shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer as to its adequacy under
the requirements of this Section.
C. In the event Grantee shall fail to substantially comply with any one or more of the
provisions of this Franchise, then there shall be recovered, jointly and severally, any
damages suffered by the City as a result thereof, including but not limited to, staff time,
material and equipment costs, compensation or indemnification of third parties, and the
cost of removal or abandonment of Facilities.
D. The security required by this Section shall not be construed to limit Grantee’s liability to
the guarantee amount, or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy to which the
City is otherwise entitled at law or in equity.
SECTION 7: CUSTOMER SERVICE
7.1. Customer Service Standards
The City hereby adopts the customer service standards set forth in Part 76, §76.309 of the
FCC’s rules and regulations, as amended. The Grantee shall comply in all respects with the
customer service requirements established by the FCC.
Page 51 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 21 of 49
7.2. Subscriber Privacy
Grantee shall comply with privacy rights of Subscribers in accordance with federal, State,
and local laws.
SECTION 8: REPORTS AND RECORDS
8.1. Open Records
A. The City shall have access to, and the right to inspect, any books and records of Grantee
and its Affiliates which are reasonably necessary to monitor and enforce Grantee’s
compliance with the provisions of this Franchise at Grantee’s regional business office,
during normal business hours, and without unreasonably interfering with Grantee’s
business operations.
B. The City may, in writing, request copies of any such records or books that are not
identified as proprietary or confidential, and Grantee shall provide such copies within
thirty (30) days of the transmittal of such request.
1. One copy of all reports and records required under this or any other Section shall be
furnished to the City at the sole expense of Grantee.
2. If the requested books and records are too voluminous, or identified as proprietary
and confidential, or for security reasons cannot be copied or removed, then the City
shall inspect them at Grantee’s regional office.
8.2. Confidentiality
A. Grantee shall not be required to disclose information to third parties that it reasonably
deems to be proprietary or confidential in nature, nor disclose books and records of any
affiliate of Grantee that is not providing Cable Service in the Franchise Area.
B. The City agrees to keep confidential any proprietary or confidential books or records of
Grantee to the extent permitted by law; provided that Grantee shall be responsible for
clearly and conspicuously identifying the records as confidential or proprietary, and shall
provide a brief written explanation as to why such information is confidential or
proprietary and how it may be treated as such under State or federal law.
C. Grantee shall not be required to provide Customer information in violation of Section 631
of the Cable Act or any other applicable federal or State privacy law.
1. For purposes of this subsection, the terms “proprietary or confidential” include, but
are not limited to, information relating to the Cable System design, as-built
documents, fiber optic cable locations and maps, customer lists, marketing plans,
financial information unrelated to the calculation of Franchise Fees or rates pursuant
Page 52 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 22 of 49
to FCC rules, or other information that is reasonably determined by Grantee to be
competitively sensitive.
2. If the City receives a demand from any Person for disclosure of any information
designated by Grantee as proprietary or confidential, the City shall, so far as
consistent with applicable law, advise Grantee and provide Grantee with a copy of
any written request by the Person demanding access to such information within five
(5) business days.
D. While it is not a legal obligation, the City, as a courtesy, will allow Grantee up to ten (10)
business days to obtain and serve the City with a court injunction to prevent the City from
releasing the Documents.
1. If Grantee fails to obtain a Court order and serve the City within the ten (10) business
days, the City may release the Documents.
2. The City will not assert an exemption from disclosure on Grantee’s behalf.
8.3. Maps and Records Required
Grantee shall make available to the City upon request:
1. A route map that depicts the general location of the Cable System facilities placed in the
Right-of-Ways. The route map shall identify Cable System facilities as aerial or
underground and is not required to depict cable types, number of cables, electronic
equipment, and service lines to individual Subscribers. The Grantee shall also provide,
if requested, an electronic format of the aerial/underground facilities in relation to a
Right-of-Way centerline reference to allow the City to add this information to City's
geographic information system program;
2. A copy of all FCC filings that relate to the operation of the Cable System in the
Franchise area; and
3. A list of Grantee’s Cable Services, rates, and Channel line-up.
8.4. Submittal of Documents
A. Upon written request, Grantee shall submit to the City a copy of any application,
notification, communication or document of any kind, submitted by Grantee or its
Affiliates to any federal, State or local courts, regulatory agencies and other
governmental bodies if such document directly relates to the operations of Grantee’s
Cable System within the Franchise Area.
B. Grantee shall submit such documents to the City no later than thirty (30) days after
receipt of the City’s request. Grantee shall not claim confidential, privileged or
Page 53 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 23 of 49
proprietary rights to such documents unless under federal, State, or local law such
documents have been treated as confidential or determined to be confidential by a court
of competent jurisdiction, or a federal or State agency.
8.5. Annual Reports
Upon request, thirty (30) days after the end of the first quarter, Grantee shall submit to the
City a written report containing the following information:
A. The most recently completed annual corporate report;
B. A Gross Revenue statement for the preceding fiscal year and all deductions and
computations for the period, reviewed by a certified public accountant, who may also be
the chief financial officer or controller of Grantee;
C. A summary of the previous years’ activities regarding the development of the Cable
System, including, but not limited to, homes passed, beginning and ending plant miles,
any technological changes occurring in the Cable System; and
D. An executive summary of Subscriber Complaints received in the previous year.
E. A description of planned construction, if any, for the current year.
SECTION 9: PROGRAMMING AND ACCESS
9.1. Broad Programming Categories
Grantee shall offer to all Subscribers a diversity of video programming services.
9.2. Parental Control Device
Upon request by any Subscriber, Grantee shall make available a parental control or lockout
device, trap or filter to enable a Subscriber to control access to both the audio and video
portions of any or all Channels. Grantee shall inform its Subscribers of the availability of the
lockout device at the time of their initial subscription and periodically thereafter. Such
devices, traps or filters will be provided at no charge to the Subscriber, unless otherwise
provided by federal law.
9.3. Access Channels
A. The Grantee shall provide to the City three (3) standard digital format PEG Channels for
Subscribers within the Franchise Area. The three PEG Channels shall include a
Government Access Channel currently being programmed by the City; the City’s
Educational Access Channel currently being programmed by the Puget Sound
Page 54 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 24 of 49
Educational Service; and the City’s Public Access Channel currently being programmed
by a designated access provider.
B. The City acknowledges that the Grantee’s Cable System provides additional benefits to
access programming needs beyond the requirements listed above. This is accomplished
through the inclusion of other regional access programming, including educational and
public access, within the regional channel line-up that services the Franchise Area. The
Grantee will endeavor to provide the Subscribers in the Franchise Area with the other
regional access channels so long as the programmers offer them for use on the Cable
System.
C. Simulcast High Definition Access Channel:
1. The Grantee agrees to simulcast the one (1) Government Access Channel in high-
definition (HD PEG Channel) format under the following conditions:
a. Upon the City’s request, the Grantee shall have twelve (12) months to activate the
simulcast HD PEG Channel.
b. The Grantee shall be responsible for all capital engineering costs associated with
fulfilling the request to activate the simulcast HD PEG Channels.
c. The City or any Designated Access Provider shall be responsible for acquiring all
equipment necessary to produce programming in HD.
d. Upon activation of the simulcast HD PEG Channel, Comcast shall own and
maintain the encoder equipment used to transmit the high-definition signal from
City Hall (the demarcation point).
e. The City shall provide the HD PEG Channel signal as specified by the Grantee’s
engineering standards, as amended by the Grantee from time to time because of
changes in technology.
2. The City acknowledges that the simulcast HD PEG Channel will be available only to
those Subscribers who elect to subscribe to Grantee’s high-definition Cable Service,
receive a high-definition set-top converter, and pay all fees associated therewith.
3. Grantee shall have sole discretion to determine the Channel placement of the
simulcast HD PEG Access Channel within its high-definition channel line-up.
9.4. Control and Connectivity of Access Channels
A. The City may authorize designated access providers to control, operate and manage the
use of any and all access facilities provided by Grantee under this Franchise, including,
Page 55 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 25 of 49
without limitation, the operation of Access Channels. The City or its designee may
formulate rules for the operation of the Access Channels, consistent with this Franchise.
B. Regarding the City’s and designated Access providers use of Access facilities and Access
Channels, Grantee shall fully cooperate with requests from the City, and provide all
necessary assistance related thereto.
C. As of the effective date of this Franchise, the Grantee maintains and shall continue to
maintain all existing fiber optic return line(s) to facilitate the City’s current Access
connectivity to Grantee’s Headend. If the City desires to relocate or expand the fiber
optic return line(s) to new location(s) over the term of this Franchise, upon one hundred
twenty (120) days written request by the City and at the City’s cost for Grantee’s
reasonable time and materials, the Grantee shall construct the requested new fiber optic
return line(s).
9.5. Location and Quality of Access Channels
A. All Access Channels provided to Subscribers under this Franchise shall be included by
Grantee as a part of the lowest Tier of service provided to all Subscribers in the Franchise
Areas or as otherwise provided by federal law. Grantee agrees to use reasonable efforts to
place the Access Channel in the same vicinity as other local government access channels.
B. The parties agree that it is the responsibility of the designated access provider(s) to
provide a quality PEG signal, to the Grantee at the point of demarcation, which meets or
exceeds the FCC technical standards. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Grantee agrees
that it will deliver to subscribers a PEG signal of the same quality it receives from the
designated Access provider(s) without degradation and in accordance with the FCC
technical standards. There shall be no restriction on Grantee’s technology used to
deploy and deliver standard digital or high definition signals so long as the requirements
of the Franchise are otherwise met. FCC technical standards shall be used for all testing
and assessment of quality under this section.
C. The Grantee shall provide Headend and hub equipment and routine maintenance and
repair and replace, if necessary, any of Grantee’s equipment required to carry the Access
signal to and from the City’s and any other Access origination point and the Grantee’s
Headend and hubs for the Access Channels.
D. If Grantee makes a change in its Cable System and related equipment and facilities, or in
its signal delivery technology, which directly or indirectly affects the signal quality or
method or type of transmission of Access programming or services, Grantee shall take
necessary technical steps and provide necessary technical assistance, including the
acquisition of all necessary equipment and full training of access personnel, to ensure that
the capabilities of Access Channels and delivery of Access programming are not
diminished or adversely affected by such change. For example, live and taped
Page 56 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 26 of 49
programming must be cablecast with as good or better signal quality than existed prior to
such change.
E. Grantee shall provide as much notice as possible but not less than sixty (60) days advance
written notice to the City prior to any relocation of an Access Channels. In connection
with the movement of any of the City controlled Access Channels, Grantee shall provide
a bill message on subscriber’s bills.
9.6. Access Capital Contribution
A. Grantee shall collect and remit to the City, as support for any lawful capital PEG use,
thirty-five cents ($.35) per Subscriber per month, payable quarterly with Franchise Fees
as a “PEG Fee.” The PEG Fee shall not be treated as franchise fees for purposes of 47
U.S.C. § 542 or any other purpose, and shall at no time be offset or deducted from
franchise fee payments made to the City under this Franchise or applicable law.
B. The City shall have discretion to allocate the PEG Fee in accordance with applicable law.
To the extent the City makes access capital investments using City funds prior to
receiving the monthly PEG Fee funds, the City is entitled to apply the subsequent
monthly PEG Fee payments from Grantee toward such City capital investments. The
City agrees that the PEG Fee may be treated as external costs under applicable federal
law.
C. Upon the Grantee’s written request, the City shall submit a report no more frequently
than annually on the use of the City specific Access Channels and capital PEG Fee. The
City shall submit a report to the Grantee within one hundred twenty (120) days of a
written request. The Grantee may review the records of the City regarding the use of the
PEG Fee.
D. The City shall dedicate the time, personnel and other resources needed to operate the
Access Channels designated herein.
SECTION 10: GENERAL RIGHT-OF-WAY USE AND CONSTRUCTION
10.1. Right to Construct
Subject to the other provisions of this Franchise, and applicable law, Grantee may perform all
construction in the Right-of-Ways for any facility needed for the maintenance, operation or
extension of Grantee's Cable System.
10.2. General Standard
All work authorized and required hereunder shall be done in a safe, thorough and workmanlike
manner. All equipment shall be durable and installed and maintained in accordance with good
Page 57 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 27 of 49
engineering practices and comply with applicable law. Grantee shall on a daily basis ensure
cleanup of all workplaces whether work is performed by Grantee or Grantee’s agents.
10.3. Repair and Emergency Work
A. In the event of an emergency, the Grantee may commence such repair and emergency
response work as required under the circumstances, provided that the Grantee shall notify
the City telephonically at 253.931.3010 during normal business hours and 253.876.1985
during non-business hours as promptly as possible. Such notification shall include the
Grantee’s emergency contact phone number for the corresponding response activity.
B. During emergencies, except those involving imminent danger to the public health, safety or
welfare, the City shall provide notice to Grantee, at a designated emergency response
contact number, to allow Grantee the opportunity to respond and rectify the emergency
without disrupting Cable Service. If after providing notice, there is no immediate response,
the City may move Grantee's facilities.
C. Grantee shall apply for appropriate permits for emergency or repair work within forty-eight
(48) hours after the commencement of said work.
10.4. One Call
The Grantee shall, at its own expense, participate in the call before you dig program required
under State law.
10.5. Permits Required
A. Prior to doing any work in the Right-of-Way or other public property (with the exception of
installations or general maintenance that involve no construction and with no disruption to
the use of the Right-of-Ways or other public property), Grantee working directly or through
a contractor, subcontractor, Affiliated Entity, or other Person shall apply for, and obtain, in
advance, appropriate construction permits from the City.
B. As part of the permitting process, the City may impose such conditions as are necessary for
protecting the public or any and all facilities with in such Right-of-Ways, and for providing
for the proper restoration of such Right-of-Ways and to protect the public and the continuity
of non-motorized or vehicular traffic. Grantee shall pay all generally applicable fees for the
requisite City construction permits.
C. Grantee agrees to comply with any required permit conditions and/or licenses.
10.6. Compliance with Applicable Codes
A. City Codes: Grantee shall comply with all generally applicable City codes regarding the
construction and use of the Right-of-Ways.
Page 58 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 28 of 49
B. Regulations and Safety Codes: Grantee shall comply with the National Electric Code,
National Electrical Safety Code and Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA) standards.
10.7. Least Interference
Work in the Right-of-Ways, or on other public property, shall be done in a manner that causes
the least interference with the rights and reasonable convenience of property owners and City
residents. Grantee's Cable System shall be constructed and maintained in such a manner as not
to interfere with sewers, water pipes or any other property of the City, or with any other pipes,
wires, conduits, pedestals, structures or other facilities that may have been laid in the Right-of-
Way by, or under, the City's authority. In the event of such interference, the City may require
the removal or relocation of Grantee's lines, cables, equipment and other appurtenances from the
property in question at Grantee's expense.
10.8. Undergrounding of Cable
A. In all Areas of the City where all other utility lines are placed underground, Grantee shall
construct and install its Facilities underground; and Grantee may only place Facilities
aerially as allowed by ACC 13.32A as it currently exists or as amended.
B. In the event that the provisions of this subsection conflict with the provisions of ACC
13.32A, the provisions of ACC 13.32A shall govern this Franchise.
10.9. Restoration of Property
A. If in connection with the construction, operation, maintenance, upgrade, repair or
replacement of the Cable System, the Grantee disturbs, alters, or damages any public
property, the Grantee agrees that it shall at its own cost and expense pay for any damage and
replace and restore any such property to the satisfaction of the City and in compliance with
the permit requirements.
B. Grantee shall warrant any restoration work performed by or for Grantee in the Right-of-Way
or on other public property as required by the Construction permit and applicable municipal
code or any generally applicable ordinance or resolution of the City.
C. If restoration is not satisfactorily and timely performed by the Grantee, the City may, after
prior notice to the Grantee, or without notice where the disturbance or damage may create a
risk to public health or safety, cause the repairs to be made and recover all direct and indirect
cost of those repairs from the Grantee. Within thirty (30) days of receipt of an itemized list
of those costs, including the costs of labor, materials and equipment, the Grantee shall pay
the City.
Page 59 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 29 of 49
10.10. Movement of Cable System Facilities
A. Relocation at Request of City. Upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to Grantee, City
shall have the right to require Grantee to relocate any part of the Cable System within the
Right-of-Way when the public convenience, public interest, or safety, health or welfare of
the public requires such change, and the expense thereof shall be paid by Grantee.
1. In the event of any capital improvement project exceeding $500,000 in expenditures by
the City which requires the removal, replacement, modification or disconnection of
Grantee's facilities or equipment, the City shall provide at least sixty (60) days written
notice to Grantee.
2. Following notice by the City, Grantee shall relocate, remove, replace, modify or
disconnect any of its facilities or equipment within any Right-of-Way, or on any other
property of the City.
3. Should Grantee fail to remove or relocate any such facilities by the date established by
the City, the City may effect such removal or relocation, and the expense thereof shall
be paid by Grantee, including all costs and expenses incurred by the City due to
Grantee's delay.
4. If the City requires Grantee to relocate its facilities located within the Right-of-Way, the
City may provide Grantee with an alternate location within the Right-of-Way.
5. If public funds are available to any Person using such Right-of-Way for the purpose of
defraying the cost of any of the foregoing, the Grantee may make application for such
funds.
B. In the case of relocation projects where the City hires and designates an independent
contractor to accommodate and coordinate the conversion of overhead utilities within a City
capital improvement project, if the Grantee decides to participate in the joint trench
opportunity then the Grantee shall enter into a separate agreement with the City that, at a
minimum, requires the Grantee to pay all design, permitting, administration, coordination,
and construction costs incurred by the City associated with the proportionate share of the
joint trench utilized by the Grantee and the level of effort required to design, permit,
administer, coordinate, and construct the joint utility trench to accommodate the Grantee’s
facilities.
10.11. Tree Trimming
The Grantee shall have the authority to conduct pruning and trimming for access to Cable
System facilities in the Right-of-Way. All such trimming shall be done at the Grantee's sole
cost and expense. The Grantee shall be responsible for any damage caused by such trimming.
Page 60 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 30 of 49
10.12. Rights-of-Way Vacation
If any street, or portion thereof, used by Grantee is vacated by the City during the term of this
Franchise, unless the City Council specifically reserves to Grantee the right to continue its
installation in the vacated street, Grantee shall, without delay or expense to the City, remove its
Facilities from such street.
10.13. Inspection of Facilities
Upon reasonable notice, the City may inspect any of Grantee’s Facilities or equipment within
the Rights-of-Way and on other public property. If an unsafe condition is found to exist, the
City, in addition to taking any other action permitted under applicable law, may order
Grantee to make the necessary repairs and alterations specified therein forthwith to correct
the unsafe condition by a time the City establishes. The City has the right to inspect, repair
and correct the unsafe condition if Grantee fails to do so, and to reasonably charge Grantee
therefor.
10.14. Hazardous Substances
A. Grantee shall comply with all applicable State and federal laws, statutes, regulations, and
orders concerning hazardous substances, as described in RCW 70.105D.020, relating to the
Cable System in the City’s rights-of-way.
B. Grantee shall maintain and inspect the Facilities located in the City’s rights-of-way and
immediately inform the City of any release of hazardous substances.
C. Upon reasonable notice to Grantee, the City may inspect the Facilities in the City’s rights-
of-way to determine if any release of hazardous substances has occurred, or may occur,
from, or related to, the Facilities.
D. In removing or modifying the Facilities as provided in this Franchise, Grantee shall also
remove all residue of hazardous substances related thereto; provided, however, that if it is
determined that the Facilities did not cause the release of hazardous substances, Grantee
shall have no duty to remove such substances.
E. Grantee agrees to forever indemnify the City against any claims, costs, and expenses of any
kind, whether direct or indirect, incurred by the City arising out of a release of hazardous
substances arising from, connected to, or incident to the Facilities in the City’s rights-of-
way.
10.15. Reservation of City Use of Rights-of-Way
A. Grantee agrees that its use of the Franchise Area shall, at all times except in instances of
prior right, be subordinate and subject to the City’s needs for municipal infrastructure and
Page 61 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 31 of 49
access to the Franchise Area and the public’s right to travel, except as may be otherwise
required by law.
B. Should Grantee fail to remove, adjust, or relocate its Facilities by the date established by the
City Engineer, or his/her designee, and provided in writing to Grantee, the City may effect
such removal, adjustment, or relocation and recover the cost thereof from Grantee, including
all costs and expenses incurred by the City due to Grantee’s delay.
C. Grantee agrees to coordinate its activities with the City and all other utilities located within
the public rights-of-way within which Grantee is undertaking its activity.
D. Grantee shall not construct the Cable System in any manner that requires any Subscriber to
install any cable, wire, conduits, or other facilities, under or over a right-of-way.
E. The City expressly reserves the right to prescribe how and where Grantee Facilities shall be
installed within the public rights-of-way and may, from time to time, pursuant to applicable
sections of this Franchise, require the removal, and/or replacement thereof in the public
interest and safety at the expense of Grantee.
10.16. Work of Contractors, Subcontractors, and Affiliated Entities
A. Grantee’s contractors, subcontractors, and affiliated entities performing work benefitting
Grantee shall be licensed and bonded according to the City’s, and the State’s, regulations
and requirements.
B. Work by contractors, subcontractors, and affiliated entities is subject to the same
restrictions, limitations, and conditions as if the work were performed by Grantee.
C. Grantee shall be responsible for all work performed by its contractors, subcontractors, or
affiliated entities, and other Persons performing work on its behalf as if the work were
performed by it, and shall ensure that all such work is performed in compliance with this
Franchise and other applicable laws, and shall be, jointly and severally, liable for all
damages and correcting all damage caused by them.
D. It is Grantee’s responsibility to ensure that contractors, subcontractors, affiliated entities, or
other Persons performing work on Grantee’s behalf are familiar with the requirements of
this Franchise and other applicable laws governing the work performed by them.
E. Grantee agrees to inspect its contractors and subcontractors on a regular basis and ensure
that both its personnel, contractors, and subcontractors provide clean-up of all workplaces
and adhere to industry safety as well as local safety standards.
10.17. Discontinuing Use of Facilities
Page 62 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 32 of 49
A. Whenever Grantee intends to discontinue using any Facility within the City’s Rights-of-
Way, Grantee shall submit for the approval of the authorizing City department, a complete
description of the Facility and the date on which Grantee intends to discontinue using the
Facility.
B. Grantee may remove the Facility or request that the City permit it to remain in place.
C. Notwithstanding Grantee’s request that any such Facility remain in place, the City may
require Grantee to remove the Facility from the City’s Rights-of-Way or modify or maintain
the Facility to protect the public health and safety or otherwise serve the public interest.
D. The City may require Grantee to perform a combination of modification, maintenance,
and/or removal of the Facility.
E. Until such time as Grantee removes or modifies the Facility as directed by the City, or until
the rights to, and responsibility for, the Facility are accepted by another Person having
authority to construct and maintain such Facility, Grantee shall be responsible for all
necessary repairs and relocations of the Facility, as well as maintenance of the City’s Rights-
of-Way, in the same manner and degree as if the Facility were in active use, and Grantee
shall retain all liability for such Facility.
10.18. Construction and Use of Poles
Grantee may negotiate and enter into pole attachment agreements with utilities maintaining
poles in the Franchise Area in accordance with ACC 13.32(A) and on terms acceptable to
Grantee and the affected utilities.
SECTION 11: CABLE SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE AND TECHNICAL STANDARDS
11.1. Subscriber Network
A. Cable System Functionality: As of the Effective Date of this Franchise, Grantee provides
its Cable Service utilizing a two-way hybrid fiber-coaxial Cable System architecture that
deploys from Grantee’s Headend to nodes throughout the City where the signal is
converted to radio frequency and runs along the coaxial portion of the Cable System to
Subscribers.
Over the term of this Franchise, Grantee shall maintain the Cable System in a manner
consistent with, or in excess of, a typical 750 MHz Cable System.
B. Grantee will take prompt corrective action if it finds that any facilities or equipment on
the Cable System are not operating as expected, or if it finds that facilities and equipment
do not comply with the requirements of this Franchise or applicable law.
Page 63 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 33 of 49
11.2. Standby Power
Grantee shall provide standby power generating capacity at the Cable System Headend
capable of providing at least twelve (12) hours of emergency operation. Grantee shall
maintain standby power supplies that supply back-up power for at least two (2) hours
duration throughout the distribution networks and four (4) hours duration at all nodes and
hubs.
11.3. Emergency Alert
Grantee shall provide an operating Emergency Alert System in accordance with and at the
time required by the provisions of State and federal laws, including FCC regulations.
11.4. Technical Performance
The technical performance of the Cable System shall meet or exceed all applicable federal
technical standards, as they may be amended from time to time, regardless of the
transmission technology utilized.
11.5. Cable System Performance Testing
A. Grantee shall perform on its Cable System all technical tests presently or hereafter
required by the FCC.
B. Upon request, all required FCC technical performance tests may be witnessed by
representatives of the City.
C. Grantee shall maintain written records of its Cable System tests performed by or for
Grantee. Copies of such test results will be provided to the City upon request.
D. Grantee shall promptly take such corrective measures as are necessary to correct any
performance deficiencies fully and to prevent their reoccurrence as far as possible.
Grantee’s failure to correct deficiencies identified through this testing process shall be a
material violation of this Franchise. Sites shall be re-tested following correction.
11.6. Additional Tests
A. In addition to the above, and to the extent applicable, where there exists other evidence
which in the judgment of the City casts doubt upon the reliability or technical quality of
the Cable System, after giving Grantee thirty (30) days prior written notice and a
reasonable opportunity to cure, the City may require Grantee to conduct additional tests
and analyze and report on the performance of the Cable System in the area having service
problems.
Page 64 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 34 of 49
B. Grantee shall fully cooperate with the City in performing such testing and shall prepare
the results and a report if requested, within thirty (30) days after such testing. This report
shall include the following information:
1. The nature of the evidence which precipitated the special tests;
2. The Cable System component tested;
3. The equipment used and procedures employed in testing;
4. The results of the testing and Cable System evaluation, including a description of any
problem(s) found;
5. The method, if any, in which such problem was resolved; and
6. Any other information pertinent to said tests and analysis, which may be required.
SECTION 12: SERVICE EXTENSION AND SERVICE TO PUBLIC BUILDINGS
12.1. Service Availability
A. Service Connections: Grantee shall provide Cable Service within seven (7) business days
of a request by any potential residential subscriber within the City provided, however,
that service can be installed via a standard installation, as described below. For purposes
of this subsection, a request shall be deemed made on the date of signing a service
agreement or receipt by Grantee of a verified verbal request. Grantee shall provide such
service with no line extension charge, except as specifically authorized below, at a
nondiscriminatory installation charge for a standard installation, consisting of a one
hundred fifty (150) foot service drop from the cable plant in the Right-of-Way to the
exterior demarcation point for residential subscribers, with additional charges for non-
standard installations computed according to a nondiscriminatory methodology for such
installations.
B. For non-standard installations that cannot be accommodated without an extension of
Grantee’s Cable System, the Grantee may elect to provide Cable Service to the requesting
resident(s) for the line extension on a time and material cost basis.
C. Distribution Line Extension Charges: The Grantee must make Cable Service available to
every residential Dwelling Unit within the Franchise Area where the minimum density is
at least thirty (30) Dwelling Units per strand mile in areas served by overhead facilities
and sixty (60) Dwelling Units per mile in areas served by underground facilities. The
Grantee may elect to provide Cable Service to areas not meeting the above density
standard and charge the requesting resident(s) for the line extension on a time and
material cost basis.
Page 65 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 35 of 49
D. Grantee shall provide Cable Service to Multiple Dwelling Units in accordance with this
Franchise and applicable laws.
E. Annexation: In the event of annexation by the City, or as development occurs, any new
territory shall become part of the territory for which this Franchise is granted.
1. The Grantee shall construct and extend its Cable System so that it is able to provide
Cable Service to any areas which may be acquired, developed or annexed by the City
during the Franchise term, or otherwise added to the City’s jurisdiction during the
Franchise term, or any extension thereof.
2. Access to Cable Service shall not be denied to any group of potential cable
Subscribers because of the income of the residents of the area in which such group
resides.
3. The Grantee shall be given a reasonable period of time to construct and activate cable
plant to service annexed or newly developed areas but in no event to exceed twelve
(12) months of Council Approval of the annexation, subject to the provisions on line
extension herein.
12.2. Permission of Property Owner or Tenant for Installation, and Treatment of Property
A. If the Facilities pass over or under private or publicly owned property, Grantee is solely
responsible for obtaining all necessary permission from the property owner.
B. Grantee shall not install or attach any of its Facilities to any property without first
securing the written permission of the owner or tenant of any property involved, or of
such other person who has the right to approve or disapprove the attachment (authorized
party), except if there is an existing utility easement; and in the event that such
permission or easement is later revoked, Grantee at the request of the authorized party
shall promptly remove any of its facilities and promptly restore the property to its original
condition at Grantee’s expense.
C. Grantee shall perform all such installations and removals in compliance with state and
local law and shall be responsible for any damage to residences or other property caused
by the installation or the removal.
12.3. Connection of City and Other Public Buildings
A. Upon request through the designated City representative, the Grantee will make available
without charge, as long as it is economically feasible, a standard installation and a
minimum of one outlet of Basic Cable Services to City administrative buildings as
designated by the City (whether they are owned or leased), and fire station(s), police
station(s), libraries, access facilities, and K-12 public School(s).
Page 66 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 36 of 49
B. Grantee may additionally volunteer to provide a digital level of service, in addition to the
Basic Cable Service, that provides access to national 24-hour news channels; provided
that if the installation to such building does exceed one hundred twenty-five (125) aerial
feet, the City or other agency agrees to pay the incremental cost of such installation in
excess of one hundred twenty-five (125) feet or a necessary distribution line extension of
the Cable System, including the cost of such excess labor and materials. The recipient of
the service will secure any necessary right of entry.
C. The Cable Service will not be used for commercial purposes, and the outlets will not be
located in jail cells or areas open to the public, except for one outlet to be located in a
public lobby in City buildings that will be used by the public for viewing City selected
programming.
D. The City will take reasonable precautions to prevent any use of the Grantee's Cable
System in any manner that results in inappropriate use, loss or damage to the Cable
System.
E. If additional outlets of Cable Service are needed in such buildings, only the Grantee is
authorized to complete the Cable Service expansion to support the outlet installation(s)
and the building occupant will pay the standard installation fees. No other Cable Service
fees shall be owed in connection with additional outlets.
F. The City acknowledges that complimentary services reflect a voluntary initiative on the
part of Grantee. Grantee does not waive any rights it may have regarding complimentary
services under federal law or regulation. Subject to applicable law, should Grantee elect
to offset governmental complimentary services against Franchise Fees, Grantee shall first
provide the City with ninety (90) days’ prior notice.
SECTION 13: FRANCHISE VIOLATIONS
13.1. Non-Material Franchise Violations
A. Notice of Non-Material Violation: If the City believes that Grantee has failed to perform
any non-material obligation under this Franchise, the City shall notify Grantee in writing,
stating with reasonable specificity the nature of the alleged default, and Grantee shall
have thirty (30) days from the receipt of such notice to:
1. Respond to the City, contesting the City’s assertion that a default has occurred, and
request a meeting in accordance with subsection B, below; or
2. Cure the default; or
3. Notify the City that Grantee cannot cure the default within thirty (30) days, because
of the nature of the default. In the event the default cannot be cured within thirty (30)
days, Grantee shall:
Page 67 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 37 of 49
a. Notify the City in writing and with specificity the exact steps that will be taken
and the projected completion date of each step necessary to promptly cure the
default; and
b. Request a meeting pursuant to subsection B below for the City to determine
whether additional time beyond the thirty (30) days specified above is indeed
needed, and whether Grantee’s proposed completion schedule and steps are
reasonable.
B. Meet and Confer: If Grantee does not cure the alleged default within the cure period
stated above, or denies the default, or the City orders a meeting, the City shall set a
meeting, not less than fifteen (15) business days after Grantee’s receipt of written notice
from the City, to investigate the existence of the alleged default or the timing and
procedure required to cure a default, and provide Grantee with an opportunity to be heard
and to present evidence in its defense.
C. Notice to Correct: If, after the meeting, the City determines that a default exists, Grantee
and the City may agree on a plan and schedule to cure the default, or the City shall order
Grantee to correct or remedy the default within thirty (30) days, or within such additional
time as the City determines.
D. Determination of Default: The determination as to whether a non-material violation under
this Franchise has occurred shall be within the discretion of the City, must be made in
writing, and based upon findings that include Grantee’s submissions; provided that any
such determination may be subject to appeal to the City’s hearing examiner or review by
an arbitrator as described in Section 16.1.
E. Enforcement: In the event Grantee does not cure the default within the time agreed upon
by the Parties or ordered by the City and to the City’s reasonable satisfaction, the City
may recommend revocation of this Franchise pursuant to the procedures in subsection
13.2 or commence the arbitration procedures in section 16.1.
13.2. Material Franchise Violations
A. The City shall notify the Grantee, in writing, of any alleged failure to comply with a
material provision of this Franchise, which notice shall specify the alleged failure with
reasonable particularity. The Grantee shall have thirty (30) days subsequent to receipt of
the notice in which to:
1. respond to the City, contesting the City's assertion that a default has occurred, and
requesting a meeting in accordance with subsection (B), below; or
2. cure the default; or
Page 68 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 38 of 49
3. notify the City that Grantee cannot cure the default within the thirty (30) days,
because of the nature of the default.
4. In the event the default cannot be cured within thirty (30) days, Grantee shall
promptly take all reasonable steps to cure the default and notify the City, in writing
and in detail, as to the exact steps that will be taken and the projected completion
date. In such case, the City may set a meeting in accordance with subsection (B)
below to determine whether additional time beyond the thirty (30) days specified
above is indeed needed, and whether Grantee's proposed completion schedule and
steps are reasonable.
B. If Grantee does not cure the alleged material default within the cure period stated above,
or by the projected completion date under this section, or denies the default and requests
a meeting in accordance with this section, or the City orders a meeting in accordance with
this section, the City shall set a meeting to investigate said issues and the existence of the
alleged default. The City shall notify Grantee of the meeting, in writing, and such
meeting shall take place no less than thirty (30) days after Grantee's receipt of notice of
the meeting. At the meeting, Grantee shall be provided an opportunity to be heard and to
present evidence in its defense.
C. If, after the meeting, the City determines that a default exists, Grantee and the City may
agree on a plan and schedule to cure the default. Absent such agreement, the City shall
order Grantee to correct or remedy the default or violation within thirty 30) days or
within such other reasonable timeframe as the City shall determine. In the event Grantee
does not cure the default within such time to the City's reasonable satisfaction, the City
may:
1. recommend the revocation of this Franchise pursuant to the procedures in this
franchise; or
2. pursue any other legal or equitable remedy available under this Franchise or
applicable law.
D. The determination as to whether a material violation of this Franchise has occurred shall
be within the discretion of the City. Any such determination by the City must be in
writing and must be based upon findings that include Grantee's submissions, and such
determination shall be subject to appeal to the City Council or review by a court of
competent jurisdiction under applicable law.
13.3. Revocation
A. The City may revoke this Franchise and rescind all rights and privileges associated with
this Franchise in any of the following circumstances:
1. if Grantee fails to cure any material obligation under this Franchise;
Page 69 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 39 of 49
2. if Grantee willfully fails for more than three (3) days to provide continuous Cable
Service;
3. if Grantee attempts to evade any material provision of this Franchise or to practice
any fraud or deceit upon the City or subscribers;
4. if Grantee becomes insolvent, or if there is an assignment for the benefit of Grantee's
creditors;
5. if Grantee willfully misrepresents material facts in the negotiation of this Franchise;
or
6. if Grantee repeatedly breaches a material provision of the Customer Service
Standards.
B. Prior to forfeiture or termination of the Franchise, the City shall give written notice to the
Grantee of its intent to revoke the Franchise. The notice shall set forth the exact nature of
the noncompliance. Grantee shall have forty-five (45) days from receipt of such notice to
object in writing and to state its reasons for such objection and provide any explanation
or cure the alleged default. In the event the City does not receive a timely and
satisfactory response from Grantee, it may then seek a termination of the Franchise in
accordance with this section.
C. The City shall submit a report and recommendation as to termination of the Franchise to
the City’s appointed hearing examiner who shall conduct a public hearing to determine if
revocation of the Franchise is warranted. The hearing examiner shall act as the final
decision maker for the City.
1. At least twenty one (21) calendar days prior to the public hearing, the City clerk shall
issue a public hearing notice that shall establish the issue(s) to be addressed in the
public hearing; provide the time, date and location of the hearing; provide that the
City shall hear any Persons interested therein; and provide that the Grantee shall be
afforded fair opportunity for full participation, including the right to introduce
evidence, to require the production of evidence, to be represented by counsel and to
question witnesses, consistent with the adopted public hearing rules.
2. The hearing examiner shall hear testimony, take evidence, hear oral argument and
receive written briefs. A transcript may be made of such proceeding and the cost shall
be shared equally between the parties. A complete record of the public hearing shall
be completed including all exhibits introduced at the hearing and an electronic sound
recording.
D. Within thirty (30) days after the close of the hearing, the hearing examiner shall adopt a
written recommendation to the City Council. If the decision of the hearing examiner is to
Page 70 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 40 of 49
revoke and terminate the Franchise, the City Council shall declare that the Franchise is
revoked and terminated, and any form of surety is forfeited, unless the City Council finds
a clear error in the hearing examiner’s decision. The City council’s written decision shall
include findings of fact and conclusions derived from those facts which support the
decision of the City council.
E. Grantee shall be bound by the City council’s decision to revoke the Franchise unless an
appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction is timely filed as allowed by applicable law.
13.4. Termination
A. If this Franchise expires without lawful renewal or is otherwise lawfully terminated or
revoked, the City may, subject to applicable law:
1. Require Grantee to maintain and operate its Cable System on a month-to-month basis
until a new cable operator is selected; or
2. Purchase Grantee’s Cable System in accordance with federal law.
B. The City may order the removal of the above-ground Cable System facilities and such
underground facilities from the City at Grantee’s sole expense within thirty (30) days
following notice from the City. However, Grantee shall have no obligation to remove the
Cable System where it utilizes the system to provide other, permitted and lawful, non-
cable services and has any other authority under applicable law to maintain facilitates in
the public rights-of-way, or where Grantee is able to find a purchaser of the Cable System
who holds such authorization.
C. If Grantee fails to complete any removal required by subsection 10.10 to the City’s
satisfaction, after written notice to Grantee, the City may cause the work to be done and
Grantee shall reimburse the City for the costs and expenses incurred within thirty (30)
days after receipt of an itemized list of the costs and expenses, or the City may recover
the costs and expenses through Grantee’s security instruments if Grantee has not paid
such amount regarding removal, which shall include reasonable attorneys’ fees and other
costs for work conducted by City staff or agents.
13.5. Receivership
A. At the option of the City, subject to applicable law, this Franchise may be revoked after
the appointment of a receiver or trustee to take over and conduct the business of Grantee
or an Affiliated Entity whether in a receivership, reorganization, bankruptcy or other
action or proceeding, unless:
1. The receivership or trusteeship is timely vacated; or
Page 71 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 41 of 49
2. The receiver or trustee has timely and fully complied with all the terms and
provisions of this Franchise, and has remedies all defaults under this Franchise.
B. In the event that this Franchise is not revoked pursuant to subsection 13.4(A), the receiver
or trustee shall execute an agreement duly approved by a court having jurisdiction, by
which the receiver or trustee assumes and agrees to be bound by each and every term,
provision and limitation of this Franchise.
13.6. Alternative Remedies
A. Neither the existence of other remedies identified in this Franchise nor the exercise
thereof shall be deemed to bar or otherwise limit the right of either party to recover
monetary damages, as allowed under applicable law, or to seek and obtain judicial
enforcement by means of specific performance, injunctive relief or mandate, or any other
remedy at law or in equity.
B. The City specifically does not, by any provision of this Franchise, waive any right,
immunity, limitation or protection otherwise available to the City, its officers, officials,
City Council, Boards, commissions, agents, or employees under federal, State, or local
law (including, for example, Section 635A of the Cable Act).
13.7. Remedies Cumulative
A. Neither the existence of other remedies identified in this Franchise nor the exercise
thereof shall be deemed to bar or otherwise limit the right of either party to recover
monetary damages, as allowed under applicable law, or to seek and obtain judicial
enforcement by means of specific performance, injunctive relief or mandate, or any other
remedy at law or in equity.
B. The City specifically does not, by any provision of this Franchise, waive any right,
immunity, limitation or protection otherwise available to the City, its officers, officials,
City Council, Boards, commissions, agents, or employees under federal, State, or local
law (including, for example, Section 635A of the Cable Act).
13.8. Assessment of Liquidated Damages
A. Because it may be difficult to calculate the harm to the City in the event of a breach of
this Franchise by Grantee, the parties agree to liquidate damages as a reasonable
estimation of the actual damages.
1. Nothing in this subsection is intended to preclude the City from exercising any other
right or remedy with respect to a breach that continues past the time the City stops
assessing liquidated damages for such breach.
Page 72 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 42 of 49
2. The City shall first follow the violation procedures in section 13 for written notice to
Grantee and a thirty (30) day right to cure period under this Franchise before assessing
liquidated damages.
B. The City shall not assess any liquidated damages if Grantee has cured or commenced to,
and completes, the cure pursuant to this Franchise.
C. The first day for which liquidated damages may be assessed, if there has been no cure
after the end of the applicable cure period, shall be the day after the end of the applicable
cure period, including any extension of the cure period granted by the City.
D. Liquidated damages as defined by this subsection may be assessed for no more than one
hundred and eighty (180) calendar days for any individual incident, after which time the
City may implement other remedies as defined in this Franchise and under applicable
law.
E. The Grantee may appeal (by pursuing judicial relief) any assessment of liquidated damages
within thirty (30) days of paying the assessment.
F. Pursuant to the requirements outlined herein, liquidated damages shall not exceed the
following amounts:
1. One hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for material departure from the FCC technical
performance standards;
2. One hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for failure to provide the Access Channel or
any equipment related thereto which is required hereunder;
3. One hundred dollars ($100.00) per day for each material violation of the Customer
Service Standards;
4. One hundred dollars ($150.00) per day for failure to provide reports or notices as
required by this Franchise;
5. One hundred dollars ($250.00) per day for failure to comply with construction,
operation, or maintenance standards; and
6. One hundred dollars ($250.00) per day for any material breaches or defaults not
previously listed.
G. Grantee’s maintenance of the security required herein or by applicable code shall not be
construed to excuse unfaithful performance by Grantee of this Franchise; to limit liability
of Grantee to the amount of the security; or to otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any
other remedy available at law or equity.
Page 73 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 43 of 49
13.9. Effect of Abandonment
A. If Grantee abandons its Cable System during the Franchise term, or fails to operate its
Cable System in accordance with its duty to provide continuous service, the City, at its
option, may obtain an injunction, or operate the Cable System, or designate another entity
to operate the Cable System temporarily until Grantee restores service under conditions
acceptable to the City, or until the Franchise is revoked and a new franchisee is selected
by the City.
B. If the City operates the Cable System, or designates another entity to operate the Cable
System, Grantee shall reimburse the City or the City’s designee, as applicable, for all
reasonable costs and expenses incurred.
C. If Grantee permanently abandons its entire Cable System, for a period greater than 12
months, then, at the City’s sole discretion, such Cable System may become the property
of the City, and Grantee shall then submit to the City a bill of sale and other conveyance
documents, to be approved in advance by the City Attorney, transferring ownership of
such property to the City.
SECTION 14: FRANCHISE RENEWAL
Any renewal of this Franchise shall be governed by and comply with the applicable
provisions of the ACC, the provisions of Section 47 U.S.C. § 546, as amended, unless the
procedures or substantive protections set forth therein shall be deemed to be preempted or
superseded by the provisions of any subsequent federal or State law.
SECTION 15: FRANCHISE TRANSFER OR ASSIGNMENT
A. Subject to 47 U.S.C § 537, the Cable System and this Franchise shall not be sold,
assigned, transferred, leased or disposed of, either in whole or in part, either by
involuntary sale or by voluntary sale, merger or consolidation; nor shall title thereto,
either legal or equitable, or any right, interest or property therein pass to or vest in any
Person (hereinafter “Transfer of the Franchise”) without the prior written consent of the
City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
B. Grantee shall promptly notify the City of any actual or proposed change in, or transfer of,
or acquisition by any other party in Control of Grantee. The word “Control” as used
herein is not limited to majority stock ownership but includes actual working Control in
whatever manner exercised. Every change, transfer or acquisition of Control of Grantee,
except as noted in subsection 15.H, shall make this Franchise subject to cancellation
unless and until the City shall have consented thereto which consent shall not be
unreasonably withheld.
C. The parties to the Transfer of the Franchise or change of Control shall make a written
request to the City for its approval of the Transfer of the Franchise or change of Control
(a “Transfer Application”) and shall furnish all information required by law. In
Page 74 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 44 of 49
reviewing a Transfer Application, the City may inquire into any matter reasonably related
to the ability and willingness of the prospective transferee or controlling party to perform,
in accordance with 47 CFR § 76.502, and applicable ACC.
D. In seeking the City’s consent to a Transfer Application, the proposed transferee or
controlling party shall indicate whether, as applicable, it:
1. Has ever been convicted or held liable for acts involving deceit including any
violation of federal, State or local law, or is currently under an indictment,
investigation or complaint charging such acts;
2. Has ever had a judgment in an action for fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation entered
against it by any court of competent jurisdiction;
3. Has pending any material legal claim, lawsuit, or administrative proceeding arising
out of or involving a Cable System;
4. Is financially solvent, by submitting financial data, including financial information
as required by FCC Form 394; and
5. Has the legal, financial and technical capability to enable it to maintain and operate
the Cable System for the remaining Term of the Franchise.
E. In reviewing a Transfer Application, the City may inquire into the legal, technical and
financial qualifications of the prospective controlling party or transferee, and Grantee
shall assist the City in so inquiring. The City may condition said Transfer of the
Franchise or change of Control upon such terms and conditions as it deems reasonably
appropriate and as are consistent with federal law; provided, however, that any such
terms and conditions so attached shall be related to the legal, technical and financial
qualifications of the prospective controlling party or transferee. Additionally, such
Person shall effect changes as promptly as practicable in the operation of the Cable
System, if any changes are necessary to cure any violations or defaults presently in effect
or ongoing.
F. The City shall act by ordinance or resolution on the request within one hundred twenty
(120) days of the request, provided it has received all information required by law, such
as a completed FCC Form 394. Subject to the foregoing, if the City fails to render a final
decision on the request within one hundred twenty (120) days, such request shall be
deemed granted unless the requesting party and the City agree to an extension of time.
G. Within sixty (60) days of closing of any Transfer of the Franchise or change of Control, if
approved or deemed granted by the City, Grantee shall file with the City a copy of the
deed(s), agreement(s), lease(s) or other written instrument(s) evidencing such Transfer of
the Franchise or change of Control, certified and sworn to as correct by Grantee and the
transferee or new controlling entity. In the case of a Transfer of the Franchise or change
Page 75 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 45 of 49
of Control, the transferee or the new controlling entity shall upon request by the City file
its written acceptance agreeing to be bound by all of the provisions of this Franchise,
subject to applicable law.
H. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Section 15, the prior approval of the City
shall not be required for any sale, assignment or transfer of the Franchise or Cable
System to an Affiliate; provided that the proposed assignee or transferee agrees in writing
to comply with all of the provisions of the Franchise, subject to applicable law.
I. Grantee may pledge the assets of the Cable System for the purpose of financing without
the consent of the City; provided that such pledge of assets shall not impair or mitigate
Grantee’s responsibilities and capabilities to meet all of its obligations under the
provisions of this Franchise. In the event of a change in Control, the Grantee will
continue to be bound by all provisions of the Franchise.
J. The consent or approval of the City to any Transfer of the Franchise or change in Control
shall not constitute a waiver or release of any rights of the City.
SECTION 16: ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
16.1. Cumulative Rights
Subject to applicable law, all rights and remedies given to the City by this Franchise shall be
in addition to, and cumulative with, any and all other rights and remedies, existing or
implied, now or hereafter available to the City.
16.2. Costs to be Borne by Grantee
Grantee shall reimburse the City for all costs of publication of this Franchise, and any notices
prior to any public hearing regarding this Franchise, contemporaneous with its acceptance of
this Franchise.
16.3. Severability
If any Section, provision, or clause of this Franchise is held by a court of competent
jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, or is preempted by federal or State laws or
regulations, the remainder of this Franchise shall not be affected, except as is otherwise
provided by this Franchise.
16.4. No Recourse Against the City of Auburn
Grantee’s recourse against the City or its officials, boards, commissions, agents or employees
for any claim arising from any provision or requirement of this Franchise shall be limited to
injunctive and declaratory relief, except where Grantee’s claim arises from acts or omissions
of the City acting in a proprietary capacity, but only to the extent such relief is not prohibited
Page 76 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 46 of 49
by federal law, which does not include granting, modifying, denying, terminating, or
enforcing franchises.
16.5. Action by Agencies or Courts
Grantee shall promptly notify the City in the event that any agency of the State or federal
governments or any court with competent jurisdiction requires Grantee to act inconsistently
with any provisions of this Franchise.
16.6. Franchise Interpretation
A. All captions, headings or titles in the paragraphs or sections of this Agreement are
inserted for convenience of reference only and shall not constitute a part of this
Agreement or act as a limitation of the scope of the particular paragraph or sections to
which they apply.
B. Interpretation or construction of this Agreement shall not be affected by any
determination as to who is the drafter of this Agreement, this Agreement having been
drafted by mutual agreement of the parties.
16.7. Choice of Law and Forum
A. This Franchise and the rights of the parties hereunder shall be governed by the interpreted
in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any action
hereunder shall be in of the county in King County, Washington.
B. Subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 4.84.330, each party agrees to bear its own
costs and attorneys’ fees generated by any dispute arising out of this Franchise.
16.8. Force Majeure
A. If Grantee is prevented or delayed in the performance of any of its obligations under this
Franchise by reason of acts of god, floods, fire, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, or
other unavoidable casualties, insurrection, war, riot, vandalism, strikes, or sabotage, to
the extent such events prevent performance by Grantee and such event is beyond
Grantee’s control, Grantee shall have a reasonable time under the circumstances to
perform such obligation under this Franchise, or to get a substitute for such obligation to
the satisfaction of the City.
B. If Grantee claims a force majeure event, Grantee shall give prompt written notice of the
same to the City and shall set forth its plan of action to meet the obligations of this
Franchise once the force majeure event no longer prevents Grantee’s performance.
Page 77 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 47 of 49
16.9. Conflict of Interest Cancellation
The City may, in its sole discretion, by written notice to Grantee, immediately terminate this
Franchise if it is found, after due notice and examination by the City, that there is a violation
of the Ethics in Public Service Act, Chapter 42.52 RCW.
16.10. Integration & Binding Effect
A. This Franchise, together with any subsequent amendments or addendums, constitutes the
entire agreement of the Parties and no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding
this Franchise shall exist or bind any of the parties.
B. This Franchise shall be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for herein
shall inure to and bind, the Parties and their respective successors and assigns, provided
that this Section shall not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment otherwise
prohibited by this Franchise.
C. This Franchise is for the exclusive benefit of the Parties and it does not create a
contractual relationship with, or exist for the benefit of, any third party, including
contractors, subcontractors, affiliates, subsidiaries, or sureties.
16.11. Time Limits Strictly Construed
Whenever this Franchise sets forth a time for any act to be performed by Grantee, such time
shall be deemed to be of the essence, and any failure of Grantee to perform within the
allotted time may be considered a breach of this Franchise.
16.12. Discriminatory Practices Prohibited
Throughout the term of this Franchise, Grantee shall fully comply with all equal employment
and nondiscrimination provisions of applicable law.
16.13. No Joint Venture
Nothing herein shall be deemed to create a joint venture or principal-agent relationship
between the Parties, and neither party is authorized to, nor shall either party act towards third
Persons or the public in any manner which would indicate any such relationship with the
other, nor is Grantee granted any express or implied right or authority to assume or create
any obligation or responsibility on behalf, or in the name, of the City.
16.14. Waiver
The failure of the City at any time to require performance by Grantee of any provision hereof
shall in no way affect the right of the City hereafter to enforce the same, nor shall the waiver
by the City of any breach of any provision hereof be taken or held to be a waiver of any
Page 78 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 48 of 49
succeeding breach of such provision, or as a waiver of the provision itself or any other
provision.
16.15. Notice
Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, any notice provided for under this Franchise shall
be sufficient if in writing and delivered personally to the following addressee or deposited in
the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as
follows, or to such other address as the receiving party specifies in writing:
Grantee's address shall be:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC &
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC
4020 Auburn Way N
Auburn, WA 98002
Attention: Franchise Director
With a copy to:
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC &
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC
15815 25th Ave W
Lynnwood, WA 98087
Attention: Franchising Department
City's address shall be:
City of Auburn
Community Development and Public Works Department
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
Attention: Engineering Aide
With a copy to:
City of Auburn
City Clerk’s Office
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
Attention: City Clerk
Page 79 of 245
DRAFT Resolution No. 5431
Franchise No. FRN19-0012
Page 49 of 49
EXHIBIT
STATEMENT OF ACCEPTANCE
______________________________, for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby accepts and
agrees to be bound by all lawful terms, conditions, and provisions of the preceding Franchise
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
[Grantee]
By: ____________________________________ Date: _________________________
Name:
Title:
State of ___________________ )
) ss.
Count of __________________ )
On this ___ day of _____________, 20___, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for the State of _______________, duly commissioned and sworn, _________________
personally appeared and executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that said
execution is performed freely and voluntarily for the uses and purposed described within the
instrument, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal on the date
hereinabove set forth.
_________________________________
Signature
Notary Public in and for the State of __________________
Residing at _________________
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: _____________________
Page 80 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Setting a Public Hearing Date for North Auburn Logistics Water
Payback Agreement (Gaub)
Date:
June 11, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
No Attachments Av ailable
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Set the public hearing date of July 15, 2019 for North Auburn Logistics Water Payback
Agreement.
Background Summary:
North Auburn Logistics Holdings, LLC constructed water system improvements along West
Valley Highway and South 287th St to provide water to their development. These
improvements are eligible for a payback agreement between the Developer and the City of
Auburn, where properties that connect to these water system improvements in the future will
be required to reimburse North Auburn Logistics Holdings LLC for the properties’ pro rata
share of the cost of these water system improvements.
City code requires the City to notify all property owners within the proposed reimbursement
assessment area of the agreement and to allow them time to comment on the proposed
agreement. After City Council approves the public hearing date, the City Clerk will publish
notice of the public hearing. In addition, letters will be sent to the affected property owners on
June 21, 2019, which provides the required 21 day comment period prior to the public
hearing.
Staff will present details of the payback agreement at the Council Study Session on July 8,
2019. Following the public hearing on July 15, the Council will consider adoption of the
ordinance approving the payback agreement.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.F
Page 81 of 245
Page 82 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Public Works Project No. CP1726 (Gaub)
Date:
June 11, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Budget Status Sheet
Bid Tab Summary
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council award Contract No. 19-05, to Rodarte Construction, Inc. on their low bid of
$3,101,975.75 plus Washington State sales tax of $113,298.27 for a total contract price of
$3,215,274.02 for Project No. CP1726, 2019 Local Street Reconstruction.
Background Summary:
The City received 11 responsive bids and the low bid was approximately 23% below the
engineer’s estimate. Staff has performed reference checks and other verification's to
determine that Rodarte Construction, Inc. meets the responsible bidding criteria and
recommends award.
The purpose of the project is to reconstruct selected streets that are in very poor condition,
as well as improve utilities, and rebuild curb ramps to meet ADA standards. The
improvements at each project site varies and are as indicated on the attached vicinity map.
Improvements are proposed at the following streets:
4th St NE - R St NE to 4th Pl NE
4th Pl NE – 4th St NE to end of road
M St SE - 25th St SE to 28th St SE
28th St SE - M St SE to R St SE
O St SE – 28th St SE to end of road
Pike St SE – 28th St SE to end of road
Additional Authorized Contingency Consideration:
Additional project funding is available due to the low bid the City received for this project. An
authorized contract contingency of $266,138.34 (8% of the contract amount) is requested
due to the potential risks of encountering poor soil conditions as identified in the geotechnical
report which may cause the utility trench walls to ravel during excavation which could resulted
in wider trench width and larger pavement restoration areas as experienced in a recent project
adjacent to the M St SE project site (between 23rd and 25th St SE).
Page 83 of 245
Construction of this project is anticipated to start in July 2019 and be completed by
December 2019.
A project budget contingency of $315,000.00 remains in the 103 (Local Street) Fund.
A project budget contingency of $350,000.00 remains in the 460 (Water) Fund.
A project budget contingency of $455,000.00 remains in the 462 (Storm) Fund.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:CA.G
Page 84 of 245
1 of 1
Project No: CP1726 Project Title:
Project Manager: Kim Truong
Award Updated:
Project Initiation (PMP) Date: __4/10/18_______ Funds Carryforward to 2019
Advertisement Date: __5/23/19______ Contract Award
Award Date: ___________ Change Order Approval
Contract Final Acceptance
Funding 2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
103 Fund - Local Street Administration 0 60,860 2,564,140 2,625,000
460 Fund - Water 0 9,845 1,400,155 1,410,000
462 Fund - Storm 0 8,274 1,158,726 1,167,000
001 Engineering Budget 2,350 34,271 6,012 42,633
Total 0 113,250 5,129,033 5,244,633
Activity 2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
PreDesign/Design Engineering - City Costs 2,350 39,527 55,824 97,700
Design Engineering - Consultant Costs 0 73,723 202,207 275,930
Permitting 0 0 1,376 1,376
Construction Contract 0 0 3,215,274 3,215,274
Authorize Construction Contingency (8%) 0 0 266,138.34 266,138
Materials Testing 0 0 40,000 40,000
Potholing/Other 0 0 15,000 15,000
Construction Engineering - City Costs 0 0 130,000 130,000
Construction Engineering - Consultant Costs 0 0 83,214 83,214
Total 2,350 113,250 4,009,033 4,124,633
2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
*103 Funds Budgeted ( )0 (60,860) (2,564,140) (2,625,000)
103 Funds Needed 0 60,860 2,249,139 2,310,000
*103 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 (315,000) (315,000)
103 Funds Required 0 0 0 0
2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
*460 Funds Budgeted ( )0 (9,845) (1,400,155) (1,410,000)
460 Funds Needed 0 9,845 1,050,155 1,060,000
*460 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 (350,000) (350,000)
460 Funds Required 0 0 0 0
2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
**462 Funds Budgeted ( )0 (8,274) (1,158,726) (1,167,000)
462 Funds Needed 0 8,274 703,726 712,000
**462 Fund Project Contingency ( )0 0 (455,000) (455,000)
462 Funds Required 0 0 0 0
2017 (actual)2018 (actual) 2019 Total
**Engineering Funds Budgeted ( ) (2,350) (34,271) (6,012) (42,633)
Engineering Funds Needed 2,350 34,271 6,012 42,633
**Engineering Fund Project Contingency ( )0 (0) 0 (0)
Engineering Funds Required 0 0 0 0
** ( # ) in the Budget Status Sections indicates Money the City has available.
462 Storm Budget Status
Engineering Budget Status
103 Local Street Budget Status
460 Water Budget Status
BUDGET STATUS SHEET
2019 Local Street Reconstruction
6/10/2019
Funds Budgeted (Funds Available)
Estimated Cost (Funds Needed)
Page 85 of 245
B asic B I D Am ount Tot al B ID Am ount Tot al B ID S pr e ad $Tot al B ID S pre ad %
LOW B ID D ER :Rodarte Const ruct ion, Inc.$3 ,1 0 1,9 75.75 $3,215 ,27 4 .02 -$959 ,16 0.2 8 -22.9 8%
Sec ond Bidder:P ivetta Broth ers C onstru c tion, In c .$3,298,221.50 $3,419,868.91 -$754,565.39 -18.08%
B asic B ID
(Tax not inc lude d)
Tot al B ID
(Inc luding t ax )
1.Ro darte C on struc tion , In c .$3,101,975.75 $3,215,274.02
2.P ivetta B roth ers C on stru c tion , Inc .$3,298,221.50 $3,419,868.91
3.M arshban k C onstru c tion, In c .$3,299,630.75 $3,431,297.75
4.A c tiv e C onstru c tion Inc .$3,327,984.66 $3,433,433.01
5.T u c c i & Sons, Inc .$3,389,563.70 $3,507,816.68
6.Rin o C on struc tion $3,534,097.07 $3,650,505.99
7.R. W. Sc ott C onstru c tion C o.$3,534,774.00 $3,665,989.05
8.Soun d P ac if ic C onstru c tion $3,790,474.00 $3,922,255.85
9.KC Equ ipm en t L L C $3,788,503.00 $3,958,736.40
10.Northw est C asc ade, Inc .$3,914,059.00 $4,043,076.40
11.Kar-Vel C on stru c tion $3,898,859.00 $4,046,257.57
NO TE: A n ev aluation of w hether a bidder is responsible or n on-respon sible w as on ly m ade f or the low bidder. T his does n ot ind ic ate, on e w ay or th e oth er, how oth er bidders w ould be c onsidered if th ey w ere th e low bidder.
Bid Tabulation - Bid Totals Summary
P rojec t: C P1726, 2019 L oc al Street Rec o n struc tion , 19-05
P rep ared By : C ity of A u bu rn
B id Date: Ju ne 6, 2019
W /O Tax I nc . Tax
ENG INEER 'S ES TIMATE:$4 ,00 6 ,2 4 5.7 5 $4,174 ,43 4.3 0
A VERA GE BID A M OUN T :$3,534,376.58 $3,663,137.42
(not inc luding tax )
6/7/2019
Page 86 of 245
0.6
NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet
Miles0.60.30
2019 Local Street Reconstruction Vicinity Map 11/29/2017Printed Date:
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
Imagery Date: May 2015
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes
no warranty as to its accuracy. Pike St SEO St SE28th St SE
M St SE:
Storm Improvements
4th Street NE and 4th Pl NE:
Roadway, Water, and Storm
Improvements
4th Pl NE4th St NE
R
i
v
e
r
v
i
ew
D
r
N
E
25th St SE
28th Street SE, Pike St SE, and O St SE:
Roadway, Water, and Storm
Improvements
Page 87 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Ordinance No. 6687 (Gaub)
Date:
May 13, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Ordinance No. 6687
Exhibits A through D
Staff Report
Vicinity Map
Cemetery Mas ter Plan
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council introduces and adopts Ordinance No. 6687.
Background Summary:
The City of Auburn has determined that a 60 foot section of unopened right-of-way in the
vicinity SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South and a 30 foot
section of unopened right-of-way in the vicinity of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th Street
could be vacated to further the City’s master plan for Mountain View Cemetery.
The right-of-way was dedicated to the public for street purposes with the West Auburn Five
Acre Tracts on March 28th, 1907. City staff and utility providers who have an interest in this
right-of-way have reviewed the proposed right-of-way vacation. Through this review, City staff
have determined that the right-of-way as it is currently configured does not meet the needs of
the City and could be vacated. This review has also determined that while the current
configuration does not meet the needs of the City and an east/west alignment between 58th
Avenue South and 60th Avenue South may still be needed to meet future connection and
transportation needs in the area, that alignment could be moved to the north edge of Mountain
View Cemetery’s northern most parcel, No. 9262800285. This would require dedication of
right-of-way under a separate action and Resolution and is a condition of the vacation.
Ordinance No. 6687 if adopted by City Council, approves Vacation No. V1-18 and vacates
the right-of-way subject to the conditions outlined in the Ordinance.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:ORD.A
Page 88 of 245
Page 89 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
1 of 6
ORDINANCE NO. 6687
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE VACATION
OF RIGHT-OF-WAY IN THE VICINITY OF SE 328TH
STREET AND 60TH AVENUE SOUTH
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn, Washington, has determined through an
evaluation of its needs for streets and right-of-ways located in the vicinity of the 60 foot
right-of-way of SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South and a
portion of the 30 foot right-of-way of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th Street dedicated
for public street use under the plat of West Auburn Five Acre Tracts under Recording
Number 475327, Volume 15, page 12 of plats on March 28, 1907, records of King
County, may no longer be needed to meet the needs of the City and that a public hearing
should be set to determine if said right-of-way should be vacated; and,
WHEREAS, a request for vacation of said right-of-way was circulated to Puget
Sound Energy, CenturyLink, Comcast and Lakehaven Water and Sewer District and City
Departments and comments were received; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Resolution No. 5377 calling for a public
hearing on May 20, 2019; and
WHEREAS, posting requirements of Auburn City Code 12.48.070 and RCW
35.79.020 have been met; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the City Council on June 17, 2019;
and
WHEREAS, through this process, the City has determined that it no longer needs
Page 90 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
2 of 6
right-of-way in the vicinity of the 60 foot right-of-way of SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue
South and 60th Avenue South and a portion of the 30 foot right-of-way of 60th Avenue South
north of SE 328th, in the City of Auburn, Washington; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of the City to vacate said portion of the right-
of-way.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Vacation. That right-of-way in the vicinity of the 60 foot right-of-
way of SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South and a portion of
the 30 foot right-of-way of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th, located within the City of
Auburn, Washington, legally described as follows:
THAT PORTION OF SOUTH 328TH STREET, BEING A RIGHT
OF WAY 60 FEET IN WIDTH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
WEST AUBURN FIVE ACRE TRACTS AS RECORDED
MARCH 28TH, 1907 IN VOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 12 IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATED WITHIN THE
NORTHWEST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21, NORTH,
RANGE 4 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, GENERALLY
ABUTTING TRACTS 51 AND 60, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 51
OF SAID PLAT, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE NORTH
MARGIN OF SOUTH 328TH STREET; THENCE EAST ALONG
SAID NORTH MARGIN TO THE EAST MARGIN OF SOUTH
328TH STREET, ALSO BEING THE EAST LINE OF SAID
SUBDIVISION AND THE WEST LINE OF PARCEL A OF CITY
OF AUBURN BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT BLA15-0005
RECORDED UNDER RECORDING NO. 20151103900003,
THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 60, ALSO BEING A
POINT ON THE SOUTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 328TH STREET,
Page 91 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
3 of 6
THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH MARGIN TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 60; THENCE NORTH A
DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
THIS DESCRIPTION CONTAINS 37,381 SWUARE FEET,
MORE OR LESS.
[Also identified as Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B hereto.]
TOGETHER WITH
THAT PORTION OF 60TH AVENUE SOUTH, BEING A RIGHT
OF WAY 30 FEET IN WIDTH, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF
WEST AUBURN FIVE ACRE TRACTS AS RECORDED
MARCH 28TH, 1907 IN BOLUME 15 OF PLATS, PAGE 12 IN
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, SITUATED WITHIN THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 21 NORTH, RANGE 4 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, GENERALLY ABUTTING TRACT
51, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT
51 OF SAID PLAT, ALSO BEING THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF THE PLAT OF MOUNTAIN VIEW NORTH, RECORDED IN
VOLUME 269 OF PLATS, PAGES 10 THROUGH 16
RECORDS OF KING COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH ALONG
THE WEST AMRGIN OF 60TH AVENUE SOUTH A DISTANCE
OF 60.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE
CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST MARGIN TH TO
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 51, ALSO BEING A
POINT ON THE NORTH MARGIN OF SOUTH 328TH STREET,
THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE EAST
MARGIN OF 60TH AVENUE SOUTH, ALSO BEING THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION AND THE WEST LINE OF
PARCEL A OF CITY OF AUBURN BOUNDARY LINE
ADJUSTMENT BLA15-0005 RECORDED UNDER
RECORDING NO. 20151103900003; THENCE NORTH
ALONG SAID EAST MARGIN TO THE EASTERLY
EXTENSION OF A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 60 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 51; THENCE
Page 92 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
4 of 6
WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 30.00
FEET TO THE WEST MARGIN OF 60TH AVENUE SOUTH
AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SITUATE IN THE CITY OF AUBURN, KING COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
THIS DESCRIPRITON CONTAINS 7,120 SQUARE FEET,
MORE OR LESS.
[Also identified as Exhibit C and depicted in Exhibit D hereto.]
incorporated by this reference, the same is vacated and the property lying in said portions
of right-of-way described above, shall be returned and belong to those persons entitled
to receive the property in accordance with RCW 35.79.040, conditioned upon the
following:
A. Dedication of 60 feet of right-of-way along the north boundary of parcel no.
9262800285 between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South under a separate action
and Resolution.
B. In accordance with RCW 35.79.030, the City reserves and grants a private
utility easement to CenturyLink, over, under, and upon that portion of the vacated right-
of-way of South 328th Street as described above and in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit
B, for the construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, improvement and
removal of facilities. The owners of the adjacent property agree not to erect any
structures on said easement and further agree not to place trees or other obstruction on
the easement that would interfere with the exercise of grantee’s rights.
C. It is provided, however, that such reserved or granted utility easement as
Page 93 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
5 of 6
set out in Paragraph B above, may be modified to accommodate a removal, relocation
and sitting of the affected utility lines if the property owners on whose property the utility
lines are located agree to the removal, relocations and sitting being paid by said property
owners and with the removal, relocation and sitting being done in conformity with
applicable standards.
Section 2. Constitutionality or Invalidity. If any portion of this Ordinance or
its application to any person or circumstances is held invalid, the remainder of the
Ordinance or the application of the provisions to other persons or circumstances shall not
be affected.
Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this location.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force
five (5) days from and after passage, approval, and publication as provided by law.
Section 5. Recordation. The City Clerk is directed to record this
Ordinance with the office of the King County Auditor.
INTRODUCED: _________________
PASSED: ________________________
APPROVED: _____________________
________________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
Page 94 of 245
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ordinance No. 6687
April 5, 2019
6 of 6
ATTEST:
__________________________
Shawn Campbell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
__________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
PUBLISHED: _______________
Page 95 of 245
Page 96 of 245
Page 97 of 245
Page 98 of 245
Page 99 of 245
1 of 2
6/5/2019
V1-18 Staff Report
RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION
STAFF REPORT
Right-of-Way (ROW) Vacation Number V1-18
Applicant: City Initiated
Property Location: Rights-of-Way located in the vicinity of the 60 foot Right-of-Way of SE 328th Street
between 58th Ave South and 60th Avenue South and a portion of the 30 foot Right-
of-Way of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th Street.
Description of right-of-way:
This ROW proposed for vacation consists of a the 60 foot Right-of-Way of SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue
South and 60th Avenue South and a portion of the 30 foot Right-of-Way of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th
Street. The SE 328th Street portion of ROW is adjacent to Parcel No. 9262800330, 9262800285 and 1421049011
which are owned by the City of Auburn as part of Mountain View Cemetery. The 60th Avenue South portion of
ROW is adjacent to parcel No. 9262800285 and Parcel No. 1421049003 which is privately owned. The total area
of ROW proposed for vacation is 44,501 (+/-) square feet.
All of the ROW was dedicated for public street purposes by the plat of West Auburn Five Acre Tracts under
Recording Number 475327, Volume 15, Page 12 of Plats, records of King County on March 28, 1907. The ROW
is currently unopened.
See Exhibits “A” through “D” for legal descriptions and surveys.
Proposal:
The City proposes to vacate the above described rights-of-way and dedicate a separate 60 foot alignment from
the north side of Cemetery Parcel No. 9262800285 under a separate action and Resolution. This plan is in
keeping with the City’s 2004 master plan for Mountain View Cemetery. This proposal will eliminate the separation
between cemetery parcels and keep an east/west alignment for connection between 58th Avenue South and 60th
Avenue South for any proposed future need in the area.
Applicable Policies & Regulations:
• RCW’s applicable to this situation - meets requirements of RCW 35.79.
• MUTCD standards - not affected by this proposal.
• City Code or Ordinances - meets requirements of ACC 12.48.
• Comprehensive Plan Policy - not affected.
• City Zoning Code - not affected.
Public Benefit:
• The street vacation furthers the City’s master plan for Mt. View Cemetery.
• The street vacation decreases the right-of-way maintenance obligation of the City.
• The vacation allows the City to clean-up the parcel lines for the Mt. View Cemetery.
Discussion:
The vacation application was circulated to Puget Sound Energy (PSE), Comcast, CenturyLink, Lakehaven Water
and Sewer District and City staff.
1. Puget Sound Energy (PSE) – PSE received the City’s request for comments regarding the proposed
street right-of-way vacation. There does not appear to be existing PSE electric or gas facilities located
within the proposed right-of-way vacation area.
2. Comcast – Comcast has no objection to the proposed vacation.
Page 100 of 245
2 of 2
6/5/2019
V1-18 Staff Report
3. CenturyLink – CenturyLink currently has underground communications facilities in the portion of SE 328th
Street that is proposed for vacation and will require and easement be reserved.
4. Lakehaven Water and Sewer District – Lakehaven has no comment on the proposed ROW vacation, as
based on the submittal it appears no existing and/or future Lakehaven water system facilities will be
required, desired, or affected by the proposed land use action.
5. Parks – The Parks Department supports of the vacation as it furthers the City’s master plan for Mountain
View Cemetery.
6. Water – No comments.
7. Sewer – No comments.
8. Storm –No comments.
9. Transportation – Transportation supports the vacation with the condition that an equivalent east/west
alignment be dedicated from Mountain View Cemetery’s northern most parcel between 58th Avenue South
and 60th Avenue South to accommodate any future transportation needs in the area.
10. Planning – No comments.
11. Fire – No comments.
12. Police – No comments.
13. Streets – No comments.
14. Construction –No comments.
15. Innovation and Technology – No comments.
16. Public Works Engineering – City Staff is aware of concerns related to the required dedication area
referenced in Condition 1 below from adjacent property owners.
Assessed Value:
ACC 12.48 states “The city council may require as a condition of the ordinance that the city be compensated for
the vacated right-of-way in an amount which does not exceed one-half the value of the right-of-way so vacated,
except in the event the subject property or portions thereof were acquired at public expense or have been part of
a dedicated public right-of-way for 25 years or more, compensation may be required in an amount equal to the full
value of the right-of-way being vacated. The city engineer shall estimate the value of the right-of-way to be
vacated based on the assessed values of comparable properties in the vicinity. If the value of the right-of-way is
determined by the city engineer to be greater than $2,000, the applicant will be required to provide the city with an
appraisal by an MAI appraiser approved by the city engineer, at the expense of the applicant. The city reserves
the right to have a second appraisal performed at the city’s expense.” Note: The city engineer has not required
an appraisal for the value of this right-of-way since the right-of-way vacation is being initiated by the City and if
approved, will attach to City owned parcels.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the street vacation be granted subject to the following conditions:
1. The City shall dedicate a separate 60 foot alignment from the north boundary of Cemetery Parcel No.
9262800285 under a separate action and Resolution.
2. A public utility easement shall be reserved for CenturyLink Communications facilities along the entire
length and width of the portion of vacated ROW of South 328th Street.
Page 101 of 245
333.3
NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet
Feet333.3166.70
1:2,000
ROW Vacation #V1-18 Vicinity Map
1in =167 ft
4/11/2019Printed Date:
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
Imagery Date: May 2015
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy. Page 102 of 245
1,333.3
NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet
Feet1,333.3666.70
1:8,000
ROW Vacation #V1-18 Vicinity Map 2
1in =667 ft
4/11/2019Printed Date:
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
Imagery Date: May 2015
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy. Page 103 of 245
Page 104 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5378 (Gaub)
Date:
May 13, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5378
Exhibit 1
Exhibit A & B
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council adopts Resolution No. 5378.
Background Summary:
City staff have reviewed the City’s master plan for Mountain View Cemetery and have
determined that the current configuration of a 60 foot section of unopened right-of-way in the
vicinity SE 328th Street between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South and a 30 foot
section of unopened right-of-way in the vicinity of 60th Avenue South north of SE 328th Street
could be vacated. While the current configuration of the unopened right-of-way does not
meet the needs of the City and an east/west alignment between 58th Avenue South and 60th
Avenue South may still be needed to meet future connection and transportation needs in the
area, that alignment could be moved to the north edge of Mountain View Cemetery’s northern
most parcel, No. 9262800285.
Resolution No. 5378, if adopted by City Council, dedicates a 60 foot east/west alignment
between 58th Avenue South and 60th Avenue South at the north edge of Parcel No.
9262800285. This dedication is a condition of Ordinance No. 6687 approving the vacation of
SE 328th Street and 60th Avenue South for Vacation No. V1-18.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.A
Page 105 of 245
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5378
April 5, 2019
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5378
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING
THE DEDICATION OF A PORTION OF CITY-
OWNED PROPERTY AS CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
WHEREAS, the City owns cemetery property in or in the vicinity of the
Mountain View Cemetery located at Mountain View Drive and 58th Avenue South;
and
WHEREAS, in order to address the City’s 2004 Mountain View Cemetery
Master Plan needs in the vicinity of Mountain View Cemetery, it is advantageous
for the City to vacate certain right-of-way under a separate action and Ordinance;
and
WHEREAS, in order to provide sufficient right of way for future
transportation needs in the vicinity of Mountain View Cemetery, staff
recommends dedicating a portion of the property as City right-of-way as a
condition of such separate vacation action and Ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the Mayor is authorized to execute a Roadway
Dedication in substantially the form as Exhibit 1, which is attached and fully
incorporated.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such
administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this
legislation.
Page 106 of 245
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5378
April 5, 2019
Page 2 of 2
Section 3. That this Resolution will take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
________________________________
NANCY BACKUS
MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Shawn Campbell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 107 of 245
EXHIBIT “1”
Return Address:
City of Auburn
City Clerk
25 West Main Street
Auburn, WA 98001-4998
Above this line reserved for recording information
RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION
Reference # (if applicable): N/A
Grantor/Borrower: City of Auburn
Grantee/Assignee/Beneficiary: City of Auburn
Legal Description/STR: North 60 FT, Tract 51, West Auburn
Five Acre Tracts, Vol. 15 Plats, Pg. 12,
Sec. 14, Twp, 21 N, Rge. 4 E. W.M.
Assessor’s Tax Parcel ID#: 9262800285
The GRANTOR, City of Auburn, for and in consideration of good and valuable consideration,
dedicates as Public Roadways as part of the City of Auburn road system and for public right-of-
way purposes, the following described real property:
SEE EXHIBITS “A,” AND “B” ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS
REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF.
All Situated in the County of King, State of Washington.
Dated this day of , 2019
City of Auburn
___________________________________
Nancy Backus, Mayor
Date:________________________________
Page 108 of 245
Attest:
___________________________________
Shawn Campbell, City Clerk
Date:________________________________
Approved as to form:
___________________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Date:________________________________
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF KING )
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that on this ____ day of _______________,
2019, personally appeared before me NANCY BACKUS, to me known to be the individual
described in and who executed the within instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the
same as the free and voluntary act and deed of the City, for the purposes and uses therein
mentioned, and on oath stated that she was duly authorized to execute said document.
In Witness Whereof I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year
first above-written:
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing at
My appointment expires
Page 109 of 245
Page 110 of 245
Page 111 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5432 (Gaub)
Date:
June 10, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5432
TIP Summary Memo
2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Program
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5432.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5432 authorizes the City Council to adopt the 2020-2025 Transportation
Improvement Program.
The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required to be amended annually
as required by RCW 35.77.010. The primary importance of the TIP is that, in most instances,
projects must be included on the TIP to be eligible for state and federal grant programs. The
TIP identifies secured or reasonably expected revenues and expenditures for each of the
projects included in the TIP. Typically, projects listed in the first three years of the document
are shown as having secured funding while projects in years 4, 5, and 6 can be partially or
completely un-funded.
The TIP is a multiyear planning tool and document for the development of transportation
facilities within the City and does not represent a financial commitment by the City. Once the
TIP is approved, projects are budgeted and funded through the City’s biennial budget. The
TIP sets priorities for the acquisition of project funding and is a prerequisite of most grant
programs. Staff also uses the TIP to coordinate future transportation projects with needed
utility improvements.
A public hearing for the TIP was set by consent agenda at the June 3, 2019 Council Meeting.
The hearing is scheduled to be held at the June 17, 2019 Council Meeting in advance of the
adoption of this resolution to adopt the TIP.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.B
Page 112 of 245
Page 113 of 245
Resolution No. 5432
June 17, 2019
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 5432
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
2020-2025 TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF
THE CITY OF AUBURN
WHEREAS, RCW 35.77.010 requires that the legislative body of each City
prepare and adopt a comprehensive Transportation Improvement Program for
the ensuing six years, but only after conducting a public hearing; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing to review the 2020-2025 Transportation
Improvement Program for the City of Auburn was held on June 17, 2019 at the
hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers of the Auburn City Hall, pursuant to
notice published in the legal newspaper of the City of Auburn on June 06, 2019.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The 2020-2025 comprehensive Transportation Improvement
Program is adopted, which will be in substantial conformity with the attached
Exhibit “A.”
Section 2. The City Engineer of the City of Auburn is authorized to file a
certified copy of this Resolution and the 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement
Program with the Washington State Department of Transportation.
Section 3. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force on
passage and signatures.
Page 114 of 245
Resolution No. 5432
June 17, 2019
Page 2
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
__________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 115 of 245
Page 1 of 2
Memorandum
To: Mayor Backus and City Council
From: James Webb, Senior Traffic Engineer, PE, PTOE
Date: June 3, 2019
Re: 2020-2025 Transportation Improvement Program – Annual Update
Background Summary
The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is required to be amended annually as
required by RCW 35.77.010 by June 30. The primary importance of the TIP is that, in most
instances, projects must be included on the TIP to be eligible for state and federal grant programs.
The TIP identifies secured or reasonably expected revenues and expenditures for each of the
projects included in the TIP. Typically, projects listed in the first three years of the document are
shown as having secured funding while projects in years 4, 5, and 6 can be partially or completely
un-funded.
The TIP is a multiyear planning tool and document for the near term development of transportation
facilities within the City and does not represent a financial commitment by the City. Once the TIP
is approved, projects are budgeted and funded through the City’s biennial budget. The TIP sets
priorities for the acquisition of project funding and is a prerequisite of most grant programs. Staff
also uses the TIP to coordinate future transportation projects with needed utility improvements.
PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE TIP
Deletions: The following projects are planned to be removed from the updated TIP:
TIP N-10: A Street SE Pedestrian Crossing Improvements ($5.55M) – The need and
approach for pedestrian connectivity between A Street SE and Skinner Road will be re-
evaluated with the A Street SE corridor study (S-5).
TIP P-3: Arterial Crack Seal ($0.1M) – The scope and funding for this project is being
consolidated with the Arterial Street Preservation Program to provide flexibility in street
preservation approaches (P-1).
TIP P-9: A Street SE Preservation (E Main St to 17th St SE) ($1.74M) – Will be completed
in 2019
Page 116 of 245
Page 2 of 2
TIP S-3: A Street SE/Lakeland Hills Way SE Intersection Study ($0.05M) – The scope of
this project is proposed to be combined with the A Street SE corridor study (which now
becomes S-3).
TIP S-4: Kersey Way SE Corridor Study ($0.02M) – Pedestrian facilities on Kersey Way will
be provided with development activities as they occur. A City project to connect any
remaining gaps may be considered in the future.
Additions: The following projects are proposed to be added to the updated TIP:
TIP R-26: E Valley Highway Widening – The project will complete the build-out of E Valley
Hwy between Lakeland Hills Way and Terrace View Drive SE.
TIP R-27: Lea Hill Road Segment 1A (Harvey Rd/M St NE to 105th Pl SE) – the project is
proposed to be split into a Phase A and a Phase B. The scope of Phase A will be to create
a new east/west connection between Garden Avenue and 104th Ave SE and cul-de-sac
Garden Avenue at 8th Street NE.
Other Modifications:
Other changes proposed to be made as part of the annual update are to revise certain project
descriptions, cost estimates, and anticipated funding sources to be more representative of project
scopes and available funding sources.
CURRENT STATUS AND NEXT STEPS:
Staff will continue to develop the 2020-2025 TIP update. The Transportation Advisory Board and
City Council comments will be addressed and adoption is anticipated to follow the schedule below.
• MARCH 12, 2019: FIRST TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD DISCUSSION
• APRIL 22, 2019: FIRST COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
• MAY 28, 2019: SECOND COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
• JUNE 3, 2019: CONSENT AGENDA TO SCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARING
• JUNE 11, 2019: SECOND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD DISCUSSION
• JUNE 17, 2019: PUBLIC HEARING & RESOLUTION FOR ADOPTION
Page 117 of 245
2020-2025
Transportation Improvement
Program
Public Works Department
Transportation Section
Adopted June 17, 2019 by Resolution 5432
Page 118 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
ii
Cover Photos: Left: S 277th St, Right: 44th St NW
Page 119 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
iii
Placeholder for Resolution
Page 120 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
iv
Placeholder for Resolution
Page 121 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
v
Table of Contents
Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1
Projects & Financing Plan Summary ................................................................................................ 3
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary ......................................................................... 11
Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects ................................................................................ 13
Signal Replacement Program (TIP# I-1) ........................................................................................ 13
Traffic Signal Improvements (TIP# I-2) ........................................................................................... 14
ITS Dynamic Message Signs (TIP# I-3) ......................................................................................... 15
Street Lighting Improvement Program (TIP# I-4) .......................................................................... 16
Harvey Rd NE/8th St NE Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-5) ................................................ 17
Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion (TIP# I-6) ............................................................................ 18
SE 320th St/116th Ave SE Roundabout (TIP# I-7) ....................................................................... 19
29th St SE/R St SE Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-8) .......................................................... 20
M St SE/29th St SE Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-9) ......................................................... 21
R St SE/21st St SE Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-10) ........................................................ 22
Auburn Way S/6th St SE Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-11) .............................................. 23
CC SStt SSWW //1155tthh SStt SSWW IInntteerrsseeccttiioonn IImmpprroovveemmeennttss ((TTIIPP## II--1122)) ..................................................... 24
124th Ave SE/SE 320th St Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-13) ........................................... 25
124th Ave SE/SE 284th St Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-14) ........................................... 26
10th St NW/A St NW Intersection Improvements (TIP# I-15) ..................................................... 27
Non-Motorized and Transit Projects ............................................................................................... 29
Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program (TIP# N-1) ............................................................ 29
ADA and Sidewalk Improvement Program (TIP# N-2) ................................................................. 30
Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improvement Program (TIP# N-3) ................................................... 31
Transit Partnership Routes (TIP# N-4) ........................................................................................... 32
F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (TIP# N-5) ................................................................ 33
Auburn Station Access Improvements (TIP# N-6) ........................................................................ 34
Auburn Way S – Southside Sidewalk Improvements (TIP# N-7) ............................................... 35
Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to Schools (TIP# N-8) ............................................................... 36
Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements (TIP# N-9) ................................................... 37
Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools (TIP# N-11) ................................................................................ 38
Preservation Projects ......................................................................................................................... 40
Arterial Street Preservation Program (TIP# P-1) .......................................................................... 40
Local Street Improvement Program (TIP# P-2) ............................................................................. 41
Bridge Deck Repair Program (TIP# P-4) ........................................................................................ 42
Bridge Structure Preservation Program (TIP# P-5) ...................................................................... 43
15th St SW Reconstruction (TIP# P-6) ........................................................................................... 44
Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE) (TIP# P-7) ........................... 45
Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (4th St SE to 8th St NE) (TIP# P-8) .............................. 46
A St SE Preservation (37th St SE to King/Pierce County Line) (TIP# P-10) ............................ 47
C St SW Preservation (W Main St to GSA Signal) (TIP# P-11) ................................................. 48
Lakeland Hills Way Preservation (57th Dr SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy) (TIP# P-12) ................... 49
Page 122 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
vi
Roadway Projects ................................................................................................................................ 51
Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program (TIP# R-1) ........................................................................ 51
I St NE Corridor (45th St NE to S 277th St) (TIP# R-2) ............................................................... 52
M St Underpass (TIP# R-3) .............................................................................................................. 53
A St Loop (TIP# R-4) ......................................................................................................................... 54
A St NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW) (TIP# R-5) ............................................................ 55
Auburn Way S Widening (Hemlock St to Poplar St) (TIP# R-6) ................................................. 56
M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) (TIP# R-7) ................................................................................ 57
49th St NE (Auburn Way N to I St NE) (TIP# R-8) ....................................................................... 58
46th Pl S Realignment (TIP# R-9) ................................................................................................... 59
Auburn Way Corridor (4th St NE to 4th St SE) (TIP# R-10) ........................................................ 60
124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th St to SE 318th St) (TIP# R-11) .................. 61
R St Bypass (M St SE to SR-18) (TIP# R-12) ............................................................................... 62
SE 320th St Corridor Improvements (116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave SE) (TIP# R-13) .............. 63
W Valley Hwy Improvements (15th St NW to W Main St) (TIP# R-14) ..................................... 64
Auburn Way S Poplar Curve Safety Improvements (TIP# R-15) ............................................... 65
Regional Growth Center Access Improvements (TIP# R-16) ..................................................... 66
M St SE Improvements (8th St SE to Auburn Way S) (TIP# R-17) ........................................... 67
Auburn Way S Bypass (TIP# R-18) ................................................................................................ 68
Auburn Way S Streetscape Improvements (SR-18 to M St SE) (TIP# R-19)........................... 69
Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (Harvey Rd/M St NE to 105th Pl SE) (TIP# R-20) ............................... 70
Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) (TIP# R-21) .......................................... 71
Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE) (TIP# R-22) ...................................... 72
W Valley Hwy Improvements (SR-18 to 15th St SW) (TIP# R-23) ............................................ 73
Stewart Rd (TIP# R-24) ..................................................................................................................... 74
R St SE Corridor Extension (TIP# R-25) ........................................................................................ 75
E Valley Highway Widening (TIP# R-26) ........................................................................................ 76
Lea Hill Road Segment 1A (TIP# R-27) ......................................................................................... 77
Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects ............................................................... 79
A St NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) (TIP# S-1) .......................................................... 79
S 277th St Monitoring (TIP# S-2) .................................................................................................... 80
A St SE Corridor Study (TIP# S-3) .................................................................................................. 81
Project Summary Sheet .…………………………………….…………………….…Appendix A
2020-2025 TIP Project Map…..…………..……………………………………………Appendix B
Page 123 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
vii
Page 124 of 245
Page 125 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary and Introduction 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a 6-year plan for transportation
improvements that support the City of Auburns current and future growth. The TIP along with
the Comprehensive Transportation Plan (CTP) serve as source documents for the City of
Auburn Capital Facilities Plan which is a Comprehensive Plan element required by
Washington’s Growth Management Act. The program may be revised at any time by a majority
of the City Council after a public hearing.
INTRODUCTION
Purpose
The purpose of the TIP is to identify priority transportation projects and assure that the City has
advanced plans as a guide to carrying out a coordinated transportation program. There are
always more projects than available revenues. Therefore, a primary objective of the TIP is to
integrate the two to produce a comprehensive, realistic program for the orderly development
and maintenance of the street system. Projects are required to be included in the TIP in order
to be eligible for State and Federal grants. Grant funding for projects listed may not yet be
secured.
Statutory Requirements
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program - RCW 35.77.010 requires that each city
prepare and adopt a comprehensive transportation improvement program for the ensuing six
calendar years consistent with its CTP. This six-year TIP shall be filed with the Secretary of the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) each year within 30 days of
adoption.
Projects of Regional Significance - RCW 35.77.010 also requires each city to specifically set
forth those projects and programs of regional significance for inclusion in the transportation
improvement program for that region. The 2020-2025 TIP includes three projects of regional
significance:
TIP Project Number Project Title
TIP# R-6 AWS Widening (Hemlock to Poplar)
TIP# R-7 M St NE Widening (E Main St to 4th St NE)
TIP# R-17 M St SE Corridor Improvements (8th St SE to AWS)
Page 126 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Executive Summary and Introduction 2
Methodology
Annual updates of the TIP begins with developing a revenue forecast to provide a reasonable
estimate of funding available to accomplish the transportation improvement needs. Since the
desire to construct transportation improvements typically exceeds the available forecast
revenue, it is necessary to establish some method of prioritizing the needs.
Transportation needs are identified by examining the latest information concerning level of
service, safety and accident history, growth trends, traffic studies and the City’s adopted CTP.
The likelihood of receiving federal or state grants for various improvements, community
interests and values are also considered. All of these factors yield a prioritized list of
transportation improvements.
Projects are placed into one of the following categories:
· Intersection, Signal & Intelligent Transportation System Projects;
· Non-Motorized & Transit Projects;
· Preservation Projects;
· Roadway Improvement Projects; and
· Preliminary Engineering & Miscellaneous Projects.
Each project is identified as a Capacity or Non-capacity improvement and those that lay within
the limits of a defined Arterial LOS Corridor per with Table 2-2 of the City’s CTP are identified
accordingly. Capacity projects from the 6-year plan are incorporated into the CTP as Group A
projects. Longer term capacity projects are listed in the CPT as Group B Projects.
Detailed project costs and funding sources are identified and provided for each project listed in
the proposed TIP. The prioritized list is then financially constrained in the first three years to
reflect the financial projections to yield the six-year Transportation Improvement Program. After
completing all reviews and compiling the document, staff makes final recommendations to the
Transportation Advisory Board and City Council for approval.
Page 127 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 3
Projects & Financing Plan Summary
TIP#Intersection, Signal and ITS Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
I-1 Signal Replacement Program
Capital Costs 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 1,300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 1,300,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
REET2 - - - - - - -
I-2 Traffic Signal Improvements
Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources:. . . . . .
Cap. Imp. Fund Balance - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
REET2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
I-3 ITS Dynamic Message Signs
Capital Costs 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 290,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 290,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
I-4 Citywide Street Lighting Improvements
Capital Costs 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000
Funding Sources:
Cap. Imp. Fund Balance - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
REET2 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000
I-5 Harvey Road/8th Street NE Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 497,970
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 497,970
I-6 Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion
Capital Costs 900,000 - - - - - 900,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Secured Federal Grant 711,000 - - - - - 711,000
Traffic Impact Fees 189,000 - - - - - 189,000
I-7 SE 320th St/116th Ave SE Roundabout
Capital Costs - - - 325,000 30,000 1,370,000 1,725,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 325,000 30,000 - 355,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - 1,370,000 1,370,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
I-8 29th Street SE/R Street SE Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - 1,450,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - 360,000 800,000 - - 1,160,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 90,000 200,000 - - 290,000
Page 128 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 4
TIP#Intersection, Signal and ITS Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
I-9 M Street SE/29th Street SE Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 200,000 800,000 - 1,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - 100,000 400,000 - 500,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 100,000 400,000 - 500,000
I-10 R Street SE/21st Street SE Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - 150,000 800,000 - - - 950,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - 150,000 800,000 - - - 950,000
I-11 Auburn Way S/6th Street SE Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 785,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - 105,000 - 505,000 610,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 25,000 25,000 125,000 175,000
I-12 C Street SW/15th Street SW Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - 800,000 - 800,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000
I-13 124th Avenue SE/SE 320th Street Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 350,000 1,600,000 - 1,950,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 175,000 150,000 - 325,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - 1,200,000 - 1,200,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (GRC) - - - 175,000 250,000 - 425,000
I-14 124th Avenue SE and SE 284th Street Intersection Safety Improvements
Capital Costs - - - - 100,000 600,000 700,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - 450,000 450,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 100,000 150,000 250,000
I-15 10th Street NW/A Street NW Intersection Improvements
Capital Costs - - 175,000 475,000 - - 650,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - 175,000 475,000 - - 650,000
Subtotal, Intersection, Signal and ITS Projects:
Capital Costs 1,409,000 1,058,598 1,828,196 3,187,794 4,137,392 3,526,990 15,147,970
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 175,000 525,000 20,000 625,000 380,000 545,000 2,270,000
Secured Grants 711,000 - - - - - 711,000
Unsecured Grants - - 360,000 1,005,000 2,400,000 2,325,000 6,090,000
Traffic Impact Fees 273,000 233,598 1,148,196 1,082,794 807,392 356,990 3,901,970
REET 2 250,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 1,750,000
Other (GRC) - - - 175,000 250,000 - 425,000
Total Funding 1,409,000 1,058,598 1,828,196 3,187,794 4,137,392 3,526,990 15,147,970
Page 129 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 5
TIP:Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
N-1 Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program
Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
N-2 Citywide ADA and Sidewalk Improvements Program
Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
REET2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000
N-3 Citywide Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improvements
Capital Costs - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 300,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
N-4 Transit Partnership Routes
Capital Costs 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,400,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 2,400,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
N-5 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements
Capital Costs 3,250,000 - - - - - 3,250,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 500,000 - - - - - 500,000
Traffic Impact Fees 750,000 - - - - - 750,000
Secured Federal Grant 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000
N-6 Downtown Transit Center Access Improvements
Capital Costs - - 125,000 - - - 125,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 25,000 - - - 25,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - 100,000 - - - 100,000
N-7 Auburn Way South Sidewalk Improvements - Southside
Capital Costs - 95,000 750,000 - - - 845,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - 80,000 600,000 - - - 680,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
REET2 - 15,000 150,000 - - - 165,000
N-8 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements
Capital Costs - - - - - 410,000 410,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 410,000 410,000
N-9 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements
Capital Costs - - - 250,000 1,100,000 - 1,350,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 125,000 550,000 - 675,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (MIT) - - - 125,000 550,000 - 675,000
Page 130 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 6
TIP:Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
N-11 Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools
Capital Costs - - - 1,420,000 387,000 - 1,807,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 213,000 58,050 - 271,050
Unsecured Grant - - - 1,207,000 328,950 - 1,535,950
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Subtotal, Non-Motorized & Transit Projects:
Capital Costs 3,950,000 895,000 1,575,000 2,470,000 2,187,000 1,210,000 12,287,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,000,000 600,000 525,000 938,000 1,108,050 600,000 4,771,050
Secured Grants 2,000,000 - - - - - 2,000,000
Unsecured Grants - 80,000 600,000 1,207,000 328,950 - 2,215,950
Traffic Impact Fees 750,000 - 100,000 - - 410,000 1,260,000
REET 2 200,000 215,000 350,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,365,000
Other (MIT) - - - 125,000 550,000 - 675,000
Total Funding 3,950,000 895,000 1,575,000 2,470,000 2,187,000 1,210,000 12,287,000
TIP#Preservation Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
P-1 Annual Arterial Preservation Program
Capital Costs 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 7,425,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 7,425,000
P-2 Local Streets Improvement Program
Capital Costs 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,150,000
Funding Sources:
Local St Preservation Fund - - - - - - -
Transfer In (Utilities) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000
REET 2 1,750,000 - - - - - 1,750,000
Other - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 7,500,000
P-4 Bridge Deck Preservation Program
Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
P-5 Bridge Structure Preservation Program
Capital Costs 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 150,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 150,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
P-6 15th Street SW Reconstruction
Capital Costs 375,000 3,000,000 - - - - 3,375,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 75,000 500,000 - - - - 575,000
Unsecured Grant 300,000 2,500,000 - - - - 2,800,000
P-7 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2
Capital Costs 1,508,000 - - - - - 1,508,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 618,280 - - - - - 618,280
Secured Grant 889,720 - - - - - 889,720
Page 131 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 7
TIP#Preservation Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
P-8 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3
Capital Costs 1,727,840 - - - - - 1,727,840
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 863,920 - - - - - 863,920
Secured Grant 863,920 - - - - - 863,920
P-10 A St SE Preservation (37th St SE to King/Pierce County Line)
Capital Costs - - - 135,000 1,576,000 - 1,711,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund - - - 67,500 788,000 - 855,500
Unsecured Grant - - - 67,500 788,000 - 855,500
P-11 C Street SW Presevation (W Main Sto to GSA Signal)
Capital Costs - - - 182,000 2,125,500 - 2,307,500
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund - - - 182,000 871,500 - 1,053,500
Unsecured Grant - - - - 1,254,000 - 1,254,000
P-12 Lakeland Hills Way Preservation (57th Dr SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy)
Capital Costs 100,000 1,100,000 - - - - 1,200,000
Funding Sources:
Arterial Preservation Fund 100,000 352,000 - - - - 452,000
Secured Grant - 748,000 - - - - 748,000
Subtotal, Preservation Projects:
Capital Costs 6,860,840 6,250,000 3,000,000 3,742,000 6,801,500 3,500,000 30,154,340
Funding Sources
Arterial Preservation Fund 2,907,200 1,352,000 1,350,000 2,024,500 3,109,500 1,850,000 12,593,200
Secured Grants 1,753,640 748,000 - - - - 2,501,640
Unsecured Grants 300,000 2,500,000 - 67,500 2,042,000 - 4,909,500
Local St Preservation Fund 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,150,000
Total Funding 6,860,840 6,250,000 3,000,000 3,742,000 6,801,500 3,500,000 30,154,340
TIP#Roadway Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
R-1 Traffic Calming
Capital Costs 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 800,000
Funding Sources:
Cap. Imp. Fund Balance - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
REET 2 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 800,000
R-2 I Street NE Corridor (45th St NE to S 277th St)
Capital Costs - - 6,760,000 - - - 6,760,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Development) - - 6,760,000 - - - 6,760,000
R-3 M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE)
Capital Costs 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 736,179
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 736,179
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - -
R-4 A Street Loop
Capital Costs 350,000 - 1,350,000 - - - 1,700,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 70,000 - 270,000 - - - 340,000
Other (Sound Transit) 280,000 - 1,080,000 - - - 1,360,000
Page 132 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 8
TIP#Roadway Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
R-5 A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW)
Capital Costs:- - - 350,000 2,650,000 - 3,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - 1,325,000 - 1,325,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 350,000 - - 350,000
Other (Development) - - - - 1,325,000 - 1,325,000
R-6 Auburn Way S Widening (Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE)
Capital Costs:1,500,000 750,000 7,250,000 7,250,000 - - 16,750,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Secured Grant 648,750 - - - - - 648,750
Unsecured Grant - - 5,800,000 5,800,000 - - 11,600,000
Traffic Impact Fees 851,250 750,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 - - 4,501,250
R-7 M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE)
Capital Costs - - 350,000 100,000 1,150,000 - 1,600,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 750,000 - 750,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - 350,000 100,000 400,000 - 850,000
R-8 49th Street NE (Auburn Way N to I St NE)
Capital Costs - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Development) - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - 3,350,000
R-9 46th Place S Realignment
Capital Costs - - - - - 375,000 375,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - 300,000 300,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 75,000 75,000
R-10 Auburn Way Corridor (4th St NE to 4th St SE)
Capital Costs - - - 50,000 600,000 200,000 850,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 50,000 300,000 100,000 450,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 300,000 100,000 400,000
R-11 124th Avenue SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th St to SE 318th St)
Capital Costs - - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 4,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - 300,000 880,000 2,000,000 3,180,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 100,000 220,000 500,000 820,000
R-12 R Street Bypass (M St SE to SR-18)
Capital Costs - - - - - 650,000 650,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 150,000 150,000
Other (Development) - - - - - 500,000 500,000
R-13 SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements (116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave SE)
Capital Costs - - 425,000 695,000 2,500,000 - 3,620,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - 340,000 556,000 2,000,000 - 2,896,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 85,000 139,000 500,000 - 724,000
R-14 W Valley Highway Improvements (15th Street NW to W Main Street)
Capital Costs - - - 250,000 3,000,000 - 3,250,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - 2,400,000 - 2,400,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 250,000 600,000 - 850,000
Page 133 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 9
TIP#Roadway Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
R-15 Auburn Way S - Poplar Curve Safety Improvements
Capital Costs 213,200 - - - - - 213,200
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Secured Grant 213,200 - - - - - 213,200
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
R-16 Regional Growth Center Access Improvements
Capital Costs - 410,000 100,000 1,500,000 - - 2,010,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - 325,000 - 1,300,000 - - 1,625,000
Traffic Impact Fees - 85,000 100,000 200,000 - - 385,000
R-17 M Street SE Corridor (8th St SE to Auburn Way S)
Capital Costs - - - - 2,050,000 5,250,000 7,300,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - 975,000 4,200,000 5,175,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 750,000 750,000 1,500,000
Other (Development) - - - - 325,000 300,000 625,000
R-18 SR-18 to Auburn Way S Bypass
Capital Costs - - 12,500,000 12,500,000 - - 25,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (WSDOT) - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 10,000,000
Other (Development) - - 7,500,000 7,500,000 - - 15,000,000
R-19 Auburn Way S Streetscape Improvements (SR-18 to M St SE)
Capital Costs - - - - 1,850,000 2,650,000 4,500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 200,000 200,000 400,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - 1,650,000 2,450,000 4,100,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
R-20 Lea Hill Road Segment 1 (R St NE to 105th Pl SE)
Capital Costs - - - 2,900,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 13,900,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - 2,310,000 4,400,000 4,400,000 11,110,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - 590,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 2,790,000
R-21 Lea Hill Road Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE)
Capital Costs - - - - - 3,500,000 3,500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - 2,900,000 2,900,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 600,000 600,000
R-22 Lea Hill Road Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE)
Capital Costs - - - - - 1,000,000 1,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - 750,000 750,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 250,000 250,000
R-23 W Valley Highway Improvements (SR-18 to 15th St SW)
Capital Costs - - 400,000 2,000,000 - - 2,400,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - 320,000 1,600,000 - - 1,920,000
Traffic Impact Fees - - 80,000 400,000 - - 480,000
R-24 Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor)
Capital Costs - - 100,000 - - - 100,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 66,000 - - - 66,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - 34,000 - - - 34,000
Page 134 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 10
TIP#Roadway Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
R-25 R St SE Corridor Extension
Capital Costs - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - -
Other (Development) - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000
R-26 E Valley Highway Widening
Capital Costs - 300,000 250,000 1,200,000 - - 1,750,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - 200,000 960,000 - - 1,160,000
Traffic Impact Fees - 300,000 50,000 240,000 - - 590,000
R-27 Lea Hill Road Segment 1A (Garden Avenue)
Capital Costs 150,000 350,000 - - - - 500,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 150,000 350,000 - - - - 500,000
Subtotal, Roadway Projects:
Capital Costs 2,386,628 2,083,135 30,607,843 31,967,550 22,672,258 29,896,965 119,614,379
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 66,000 50,000 1,250,000 300,000 1,666,000
Secured Grants 861,950 - - - - - 861,950
Unsecured Grants - 325,000 6,660,000 12,826,000 13,630,000 17,000,000 50,441,000
Traffic Impact Fees 1,194,678 1,608,135 2,507,843 3,941,550 3,992,258 3,646,965 16,891,429
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - 34,000 - - - 34,000
REET 2 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 800,000
Other (WSDOT) - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 10,000,000
Other (Development) - - 15,110,000 10,000,000 3,650,000 8,800,000 37,560,000
Other (ST) 280,000 - 1,080,000 - - - 1,360,000
Total Funding 2,386,628 2,083,135 30,607,843 31,967,550 22,672,258 29,896,965 119,614,379
TIP#Pre. Eng. and Misc. Projects 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
S-1 A Street NW, Phase 1
Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Secured Fed and State Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - 75,000
S-2 S 272nd/277th Street St Corridor Environmental Monitoring
Capital Costs 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000
S-3 A Street SE Corridor Study
Capital Costs 105,000 - - - - - 105,000
Funding Sources:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 55,000 - - - - - 55,000
Unsecured Grant - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 50,000 - - - - - 50,000
Subtotal, Pre. Eng. and Misc. Projects:
Capital Costs 150,000 45,000 45,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000
Funding Sources
Unrestricted Street Revenue 55,000 - - - - - 55,000
Secured Grants - - - - - - -
Unsecured Grants - - - - - - -
Traffic Impact Fees 95,000 45,000 45,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 245,000
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - -
Total Funding 150,000 45,000 45,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000
Page 135 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 11
PROJECT FINANCING SUMMARY:2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total
CAPITAL COSTS
Int., Signal and ITS Projects 1,409,000 1,058,598 1,828,196 3,187,794 4,137,392 3,526,990 15,147,970
Non-Motorized Projects 3,950,000 895,000 1,575,000 2,470,000 2,187,000 1,210,000 12,287,000
Preservation Projects 6,860,840 6,250,000 3,000,000 3,742,000 6,801,500 3,500,000 30,154,340
Roadway Projects 2,386,628 2,083,135 30,607,843 31,967,550 22,672,258 29,896,965 119,614,379
Prel. Eng. and Misc. Projects 150,000 45,000 45,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 300,000
Total Costs 14,756,468 10,331,733 37,056,039 41,387,344 35,818,150 38,153,955 177,503,689
FUNDING SOURCES:
Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,230,000 1,125,000 611,000 1,613,000 2,738,050 1,445,000 8,762,050
Secured Grants 5,326,590 748,000 - - - - 6,074,590
Unsecured Grants 300,000 2,905,000 7,620,000 15,105,500 18,400,950 19,325,000 63,656,450
Traffic Impact Fees 2,312,678 1,886,733 3,801,039 5,044,344 4,819,650 4,433,955 22,298,399
Traffic Mitigation Fees - - 34,000 - - - 34,000
Local Street Pres. Fund 103 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,150,000
Arterial Preservation Fund 105 2,907,200 1,352,000 1,350,000 2,024,500 3,109,500 1,850,000 12,593,200
Cap. Imp. Fund Balance - - - - - - -
REET2 500,000 665,000 800,000 650,000 650,000 650,000 3,915,000
Other (WSDOT) - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - 10,000,000
Other (Development) - - 15,110,000 10,000,000 3,650,000 8,800,000 37,560,000
Other (MIT) - - - 125,000 550,000 - 675,000
Other (ST) 280,000 - 1,080,000 - - - 1,360,000
Other (GRC) - - - 175,000 250,000 - 425,000
Total Funding 14,756,468 10,331,733 37,056,039 41,387,344 35,818,150 38,153,955 177,503,689
Financial Constraint & Fund Balance Summary
Financial Constraint and Fund Balance Summary
2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Unrestricted Street Revenue 102
Beginning Fund Balance 1,269,477 659,477 154,477 168,477 (819,523) (2,927,573)
Forecast Annual Revenue 620,000 620,000 625,000 625,000 630,000 630,000
Project Expenses 1,230,000 1,125,000 611,000 1,613,000 2,738,050 1,445,000
End of Year Fund Balance 659,477 154,477 168,477 (819,523) (2,927,573) (3,742,573)
Traffic Impact Fees
Beginning Fund Balance 5,881,106 4,543,428 3,631,695 830,656 (3,213,688) (7,008,338)
Forecast Annual Revenue 975,000 975,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,025,000 1,025,000
Project Expenses 2,312,678 1,886,733 3,801,039 5,044,344 4,819,650 4,433,955
End of Year Fund Balance 4,543,428 3,631,695 830,656 (3,213,688) (7,008,338) (10,417,293)
Traffic Mitigation Fees
Beginning Fund Balance 71,309 71,309 71,309 37,309 37,309 37,309
Forecast Annual Revenue - - - - - -
Project Expenses - - 34,000 - - -
End of Year Fund Balance 71,309 71,309 37,309 37,309 37,309 37,309
Local Street Preservation Fund 103
Beginning Fund Balance 1,206,581 1,056,581 1,156,581 1,256,581 1,356,581 1,456,581
Forecast Annual Revenue 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,750,000
Project Expenses 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000
End of Year Fund Balance 1,056,581 1,156,581 1,256,581 1,356,581 1,456,581 1,556,581
Arterial Preservation Fund 105
Beginning Fund Balance 833,496 26,296 774,296 1,624,296 1,799,796 890,296
Forecast Annual Revenue 2,100,000 2,100,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,200,000 2,300,000
Project Expenses 2,907,200 1,352,000 1,350,000 2,024,500 3,109,500 1,850,000
End of Year Fund Balance 26,296 774,296 1,624,296 1,799,796 890,296 1,340,296
Grants
Secured Grants 5,326,590 748,000 - - - -
Unsecured Grants 300,000 2,905,000 7,620,000 15,105,500 18,400,950 19,325,000
Page 136 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program
Projects and Financing Plan Summary 12
Page 137 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 13 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Signal Replacement ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- 150,000 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 - 1,450,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - REET2- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 150,000 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 150,000 - - - - 200,000 - - 350,000 Right of Way- - 50,000 - - - - - - 50,000 Construction- - - 525,000 - - - 525,000 - 1,050,000 Total Expenditures:- 150,000 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 - 1,450,000 TIP# I-1Description:This program will replace existing traffic signals as they reach the end of their serviceable life span. Replacement signals will match the City's current design standards, meet ADA accessiblity requirements, and include battery backup power supplies. The signal anticipated to be replaced in 2021 is the Auburn Way N/1st Street NE signal which was constructed in 1968. The signal anticipated to be replaced in 2025 is the E Main Street/Auburn Avenue signal which was also constructed in 1968.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no additional impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 138 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 14 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Project Title: Traffic Signal ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:Scott NutterLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostCap. Imp. Fund Balance- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET 2- 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,375,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,375,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - - - - Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,375,000 Total Expenditures:- 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,375,000 TIP# I-2Description:This project funds end of life capital replacement for traffic signal and Intelligent Transportation System equipment including cabinets, video detection cameras, field network devices, traffic cameras, battery backup components, and other related equipment. This project also funds minor safety improvements, operations improvements, and Accessible Pedestrian Signal Improvements based on the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Progress Summary:Project continues to complete various intersection improvements.Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 139 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 15 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message SignsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Non-Capacity (ITS)Project Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue97,500 126,820 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 639,320 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - REET2 (328 Fund)97,500 - - - - - - - - 97,500 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:195,000 126,820 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 736,820 Capital Expenditures:Design12,500 20,000 - - 20,000 - - 20,000 - 72,500 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction182,500 106,820 125,000 - - 125,000 - - 125,000 664,320 Total Expenditures:195,000 126,820 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 736,820 TIP# I-3BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance and operational costs for this project is estimated to be $6,000. Description:This project funds the design and construction of Dynamic Message Signs at various locations throughout the City. Dynamic message signs are an important ITS tool for providing information to roadway users. Priority locations for sign placement are based on the Comprehensive Transportation Plans ITS map and include S. 277th, Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway, Lake Tapps Parkway, 15th St NW, and Lea Hill Rd.Progress Summary:The first two signs (Auburn Way S and S 277th Street) have been completed. Page 140 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 16 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Project Title: Street Lighting Improvement ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:Scott NutterLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostCap. Imp. Fund Balance- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET 2- 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - - - - Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000 Total Expenditures:- 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000 TIP# I-4Description:This project funds lighting improvements throughout the City, including conversion to LED lighting and installing new street lights. Progress Summary:This is a new program for 2017.Future Impact on Operating Budget:BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 141 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 17 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Harvey Rd NE/8th St NE Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP0611Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:N/ALOS Corridor ID# 5,19Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)776,777 84,401 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 243,561 1,602,709 Traffic Impact Fees204,500 - - - - - - - - 204,500 PWTF 1,527,300 - - - - - - - - 1,527,300 Total Funding Sources:1,731,800 84,401 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 243,561 1,807,209 Capital Expenditures:Design327,500 - - - - - - - - 327,500 Right of Way200,400 - - - - - - - - 200,400 Construction1,203,900 - - - - - - 1,203,900 Long Term Debt: PWTF 776,777 84,401 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 243,561 1,602,709 Total Expenditures:1,731,800 84,401 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 243,561 1,807,209 TIP# I-5BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no additional impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.Description:Add one eastbound through/right turn-lane on 8th St NE to the west of Harvey Rd. Modify traffic signals and traffic channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane will reduce traffic delays and queuing at the intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all directions. This project will reconstruct M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles long with a four-lane cross-section. The reconstruction will address the existing poor pavement condition and fill in any gaps in the sidewalk network. Progress Summary:Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for PWTFL debt payments. Page 142 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 18 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lake Tapps Parkway ITS ExpansionSTIP# AUB-54Project No:CP1618Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:Jai CarterLOS Corridor ID# 17Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Secured Federal Grant- 82,950 711,000 - - - - - - 793,950 Traffic Impact Fees3,572 22,050 189,000 - - - - - - 214,622 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:3,572 105,000 900,000 - - - - - - 1,008,572 Capital Expenditures:Design3,572 105,000 - - - - - - - 108,572 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - 900,000 - - - - - - 900,000 Total Expenditures:3,572 105,000 900,000 - - - - - - 1,008,572 TIP# I-6Description:The project funds the design, coordination, permitting, and construction of new ITS infrastructure along Lake Tapps Parkway from Lakeland Hills Way to East Valley Highway, and along East Valley Highway to Lakeland Hills Way. The proposed ITS infrastructure includes conduit, fiber, VMS signage, cameras, network communication upgrades, and weather stations along the route.Progress Summary:Federal Grant application was submitted to PSRC in May 2014. Project was awarded design and construction funds in 2016; the awarded funds were released to the City in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 143 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 19 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: SE 320th Street/116th Avenue SE RoundaboutSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 25Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 325,000 30,000 - - 355,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - 1,370,000 - 1,370,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 325,000 30,000 1,370,000 - 1,725,000 Capital Expenditures:Pre-Design- - - - - - - - - - Design- - - - - 325,000 - - - 325,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 30,000 - - 30,000 Construction- - - - - - - 1,370,000 - 1,370,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 325,000 30,000 1,370,000 - 1,725,000 TIP# I-7Description:This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a modern roundabout at the SE 320th Street intersction with 116th Avenue SE. The intersection currently has stop control on the 116th Avenue SE approaches. Progress Summary:The schedule for the project is dependent on the ability to secure grant funding.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 144 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 20 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: R Street SE/29th Street SE Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 16, 27Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - 360,000 800,000 - - - 1,160,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 90,000 200,000 - - - 290,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - 450,000 - - - - 450,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,450,000 TIP# I-8Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This project funds the design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of intersection capacity and safety improvements at the 29th St SE/R St SE intersection.Progress Summary: Page 145 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 21 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: M Street SE/29th Street SE Intersection Safety ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 27Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 100,000 400,000 - - 500,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 200,000 800,000 - - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 200,000 - - - 200,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 200,000 800,000 - - 1,000,000 TIP# I-9BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.Description:This project includes the design and construction of a new traffic signal.Progress Summary:M St SE & 29th St SE is currently an all-way stop controlled intersection, experiences significant congestion in the peak traffic hours, and has a documented high collision history. Preliminary design is scheduled to be initiated in 2019. Construction will be completed when project is fully funded. Page 146 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 22 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: R Street SE/21st Street SE Intersection Safety ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1918Project Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 16Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - 150,000 800,000 - - - - 950,000 Traffic Mitigation Funds- - - - - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - 150,000 800,000 - - - - 950,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Right of Way- - - 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Construction- - - - 800,000 - - - 800,000 Total Expenditures:- - - 150,000 800,000 - - - - 950,000 TIP# I-10BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.Description:This project includes the design and construction of intersection safety improvements.Progress Summary:R St SE/21st St SE is currently a two-way stop controlled intersection, experiences significant congestion in the peak traffic hours, and has a documented high collision history. Analysis to determine appropriate intersection control and preliminary design are anticipated to be compelted in 2019. Construction will be completed when the project is fully funded. Interim improvements were constructed in 2017 to improve the pedestrian crossing in partnership with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Page 147 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 23 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Way S/6th Street SE Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 3Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Federal Grant- - - - - 105,000 - 505,000 - 610,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 25,000 25,000 125,000 - 175,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 - 785,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 130,000 - - - 130,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 25,000 - - 25,000 Construction- - - - - - - 630,000 - 630,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 - 785,000 TIP# I-11Description:This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a new southbound right-turn pocket on Auburn Way S at the intersection with 6th Street SE/SR-18 EB ramps. Progress Summary:The project phases will be completed when grant funding is secured.Future Impact on Operating Budget:This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 148 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 24 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: C Street SW/15th Street SW Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 12, 13Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 200,000 200,000 - - 400,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 200,000 - - - 200,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 1,000,000 - - 1,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,200,000 TIP # I-12Description:This project will construct a southbound right-turn pocket, re-channelize the intersection to provide two southbound through lanes, and replace the existing spanwire traffic signal with a new traffic signal.Progress Summary:Design is planned to begin in 2022. Construction will be sheduled once full funding is secured.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 149 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 25 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 124th Avenue SE/SE 320th Street Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 23, 25Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 175,000 150,000 - - 325,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 1,200,000 - - 1,200,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (GRC)- - - - - 175,000 250,000 - - 425,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 350,000 1,600,000 - - 1,950,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 350,000 - - - 350,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Construction- - - - - - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 350,000 1,600,000 - - 1,950,000 TIP# I-13Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of improvements to the intersection of SE 320th St/124th Ave SE. The intersection is located at the main entrance to Green River College and will require additional on-site improvements to be constructed.Progress Summary: Page 150 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 26 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 124th Avenue SE/SE 284th Street Intersection Safety ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - 450,000 - 450,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - 100,000 150,000 - 250,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - 100,000 600,000 - 700,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Construction- - - - - - - 550,000 - 550,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - 100,000 600,000 - 700,000 TIP# I-14BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,000.Description:This project will complete the design phase, purchase ROW, and construct safety and capacity improvements at this intersection. The improvements will include a left-turn lane for northbound vehicles on 124th Avenue SE.Progress Summary:Page 151 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 27 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 10th Street NW/A Street NW Intersection ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 175,000 475,000 - - - 650,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 175,000 475,000 - - - 650,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - 175,000 - - - - 175,000 Right of Way- - - - - 475,000 - - - 475,000 Construction- - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures:- - - - 175,000 475,000 - - - 650,000 TIP# I-15Description:This project will complete the design and construction of a new traffic signal in place of the existing stop-control on the 10th Street NW approach.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 152 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Intersection, Traffic Signal and ITS Projects 28 Page 153 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 29 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-Capacity (Annual)Project Manager:James WebbLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 70,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 - 630,000 Total Expenditures:- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 TIP# N-1Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This is an annual program to fund small pedestrian improvement projects at locations throughout the City. Projects are prioritized annually based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies, and citizen requests. Progress Summary: Page 154 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 30 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Project Title: ADA and Sidewalk Improvement Program STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:James WebbLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostCap. Imp. Fund Balance- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET 2- 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,400,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 - 140,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 - 1,260,000 Total Expenditures:- 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,400,000 TIP# N-2Description:This project funds citywide accessibility improvements to the public right-of-way sidewalk system including adding/upgrading curb ramps, removing barriers to access and completing gaps. Projects are prioritized annually based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies, and citizen requests. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 155 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 31 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improvement Program STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-Capacity (Safety)Project Manager:James WebbLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- 90,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 490,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 90,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 490,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 - 10,000 10,000 50,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 80,000 - 90,000 - 90,000 - 90,000 90,000 440,000 Total Expenditures:- 90,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 490,000 TIP# N-3Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This is a bi-annual program to fund bicycle and safety improvements on classified roadways. Projects are prioritized bi-annually based upon field studies and community feedback.Progress Summary: Page 156 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 32 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Transit Parternship RoutesSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:N/AProject Type:OtherProject Manager:Joe WelshLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2,800,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET- - - - - - - - - - Other (Agencies)- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2,800,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - - - - Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Transit Service- 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2,800,000 Total Expenditures:- 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2,800,000 TIP# N-4Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Operating costs associated with the Commuter Shuttle (PT497) from the Lakeland Hills neighborhood to Auburn Station and King County Metro Transit's Route 910. Progress Summary:The Lakeland Hills route, PT497, began in 2009, the community shuttle, Route 910, in 2010. Lakeland Hills Sounder Shuttle is a partnership route with King County Metro and Pierce Transit currently authorized through February 2020. Route 910 is a KC Metro Transit Now Partnership Program currently authorized until September 2020. It is anticipated that the partnership agreement will be renewed in 2020. Page 157 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 33 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Downtown to Les Gove) STIP# AUB-49Project No:CP1416Project Type:Capacity, Non-MotorizedProject Manager:Seth WickstromLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - 500,000 - - - - - 500,000 Secured Federal Grant331,990 188,010 2,000,000 - - - - - - 2,520,000 Traffic Impact Fees55,789 114,211 750,000 - - - - - 920,000 Unsecured Federal Grant- - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:387,779 302,221 3,250,000 - - - - - - 3,940,000 Capital Expenditures:Design387,779 252,221 - - - - - - - 640,000 Right of Way- 50,000 - - - - - - - 50,000 Construction- - 3,250,000 - - - 3,250,000 Total Expenditures:387,779 302,221 3,250,000 - - - - - - 3,940,000 TIP# N-5Description:The F St SE project includes pavement rehabilitation, installation of curbs, gutters, bike lanes, sidewalks, ADA improvements, utility undergrounding, LED street lighting, new two way center left turn-lane, crash attenuation at the supports for the BNSF railroad bridge, wayfinding signage and a "Bicycle Boulevard" designation of roadway connections between Auburn City Hall and the Les Gove Park Campus. This project improves mobility and safety along the corridor and will complete a gap in the non-motorized network between Auburn's Regional Growth Center and the Les Gove Community Campus. The major infrastructure improvements are approximately 0.3 miles long and the "Bicycle Boulevard" improvements are just over a mile long. Progress Summary:Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Federal Grant was secured in 2014 for design and ROW phases. Design phase was initiated in 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $4,100.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 158 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 34 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Station Access ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Non-Capacity, TransitProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (Sound Transit)- - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - 125,000 - - - - 125,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - 15,000 - - - - 15,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - 110,000 - - - - 110,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 125,000 - - - - 125,000 TIP# N-6BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to minimal.Description:This project will modify channelization and curb radii to improve turning radii for transit vehicles at the northeast corner of A St SW/2nd St SW. Progress Summary: Page 159 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 35 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUNDS (328)Project Title: Auburn Way S (SR-164) - Southside Sidewalk ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Non-motorized, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 4Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostCap. Imp. Fund Balance- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - 80,000 600,000 - - - - 680,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - REET2- - - 15,000 150,000 - - - - 165,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - 95,000 750,000 - - - - 845,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - 95,000 - - - - - 95,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - 750,000 - - - - 750,000 Total Expenditures:- - - 95,000 750,000 - - - - 845,000 TIP# N-7Description: The project will construct missing sidewalk along the south side of Auburn Way S. The existing sidewalk along the south side currently ends at the intersection with Howard Road and restarts to the west of the intersection with Muckleshoot Plaza. The sidewalk gap extends for approximately 1,700 feet. The project also includes a Rapid Flashing Rectangular Beacon (RRFB) across Howard Road to provide a connection from the existing non-motorized facilities to the proposed improvements. TIB awarded funding to design and construct the missing sidewalk along the north side of Auburn Way S, with construction anticipated to be completed by the end of 2019.Progress Summary:Grant funding for the project will be applied for in 2020. If awarded, the design phase would occur in 2021 with construction of the improvements in 2022.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Costs Page 160 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 36 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1810Project Type:Capacity, Non-MotorizedProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 37Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue24,500 - - - - - - - - 24,500 Unsecured State Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 410,000 2,270,000 2,680,000 Other(Auburn Sch. District)122,500 - - - - - - - - 122,500 Traffic Mitigation Fees100,000 - - - - - - - - 100,000 Total Funding Sources:247,000 - - - - - - 410,000 2,270,000 2,927,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - 200,000 - 200,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - 210,000 - 210,000 Construction247,000 - - - - - - - 2,270,000 2,517,000 Total Expenditures:247,000 - - - - - - 410,000 2,270,000 2,927,000 TIP# N-8BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.Description:Phase 1 of the project included the vertical realignment of S 316th Street along the school frontage to address a sight-distance problems associated with the school driveways and at the intersection with 56th Avenue S. This improvement is being constructed by the school district as part of their half street improvements associated with on-site improvements to the school. Phase 2 of the project will realign the 56th Avenue S approach to S 316th Street to the east to remove the offset between the street approach and school driveway, and a roundabout will be constructed at the S 316th Street/56th Avenue S intersection replacing the existing all-way stop-control. Other project elements include street lighting and required storm water system improvements.Progress Summary:A partnership with the Auburn School District was created for the Phase 1 improvements, which were completed 2019. Page 161 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 37 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Non-MotorizedProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 27Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 125,000 550,000 - - 675,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - - - 125,000 550,000 - - 675,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 250,000 1,100,000 - - 1,350,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 250,000 1,100,000 - - 1,350,000 TIP # N-9Description:This project is planned as a partnerhsip between the City of Auburn and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to improve pedestrian safety by constructing sidewalks, street lighting, and related storm improvements along the east side of Riverwalk Drive SE between Auburn Way S and Howard Road SE. This project will close a major gap in sidewalk system and ties into the proposed improvements on Auburn Way South. The project will also install a RRFB at the intersection with Howard Road.Progress Summary:Design is anticipated to begin in 2022. Construction will be completed when funds are available.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $10,000.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 162 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 38 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lea Hill Safe Routes to SchoolsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Non-MotorizedProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - 213,000 58,050 - - 271,050 Unsecured State Grant- - - - - 1,207,000 328,950 - - 1,535,950 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 1,420,000 387,000 - - 1,807,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 70,000 - - - 70,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - 1,350,000 387,000 - - 1,737,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 1,420,000 387,000 - - 1,807,000 TIP# N-11Description:The project will design and construct non-motorized improvements along SE 304th St from Hazelwood Elementary School extending east to 124th Ave SE and continuing south along 124th Ave SE to Lea Hill Elementary School. The project will complete multiple gaps in the existing non-motorized network. The elements of work include construction of approximately 2,400 linear feet of sidewalk to match adjacent widths. The project will also construct curb and gutter, ADA compliant curb ramps, driveways aprons and retaining walls associated with the new sidewalks. Utility poles will need to be relocated to accommodate the proposed sidewalk alignment in some locations. Where sidewalks are installed the bike network will be extended in most locations along the project to include the connection to and from the existing bicycle improvements constructed as part of the SE 304th St/124th Ave SE roundabout. Additional lighting is proposed for pedestrian safety and will be incorporated onto existing/relocated utility poles. Ancillary work, including but not limited to, property restoration, grading, storm upgrades, school zone beacon relocation, channelization, fencing, landscaping and mailbox relocation will be addressed with the project. Progress Summary:Grant funding will be applied for in 2020. If secured the design phase will be started in 2021 and construction completed during 2022.Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 163 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Non-Motorized and Transit Projects 39 Page 164 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 40 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Arterial Street Preservation ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Jacob SweetingLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- 1,000,000 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 - 8,425,000 Utility Tax- - - - - - - - - - REET2- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 1,000,000 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 - 8,425,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 100,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 60,000 50,000 60,000 - 390,000 Right of Way- - - - - - Construction- 900,000 1,050,000 380,000 1,150,000 1,615,000 1,250,000 1,690,000 - 8,035,000 Total Expenditures:- 1,000,000 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 - 8,425,000 TIP# P-1Description: Implement regular pavement maintenance and/or rehabilitation of various classified streets citywide. These projects may include a combination of crack seal, overlays, rebuilds, and spot repairs. This program is funded through a 1% utility tax that was adopted by City Council during 2008.Progress Summary:The 2017 construction cycle included the completion of the B Street NW reconstruction and provided matching funds for the Federally funded preservation projects on Auburn Way N and Lake Tapps Parkway. 2018 construction includes matching funds for the Federally funded preservation of S 277th Street and 15th Street NE/NW preservation, and for arterial patching and overlay. Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 165 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 41 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanLOCAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (103)Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Jacob SweetingLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostLocal Street Preserv. Fund- 650,000 - - - - - - - 650,000 Transfer In (Utilities)- 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 1,050,000 REET2- 1,750,000 1,750,000 - - - - - - 3,500,000 Other- - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 - 7,500,000 Total Funding Sources:- 2,550,000 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 12,700,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 525,000 525,000 500,000 525,000 500,000 525,000 500,000 - 3,600,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 2,025,000 1,375,000 1,150,000 1,125,000 1,150,000 1,125,000 1,150,000 - 9,100,000 Total Expenditures:- 2,550,000 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 12,700,000 TIP# P-2BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:The program preserves local (unclassified) streets. The work includes crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre-leveling, asphalt overlays and roadway reconstruction. Beginning in 2019 REET funding was dedicated by council to this program.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.Progress Summary:This program has successfully completed overlays, chip seals and complete reconstructions since 2005. The program will focus on completing reconstruction needs in addition to regular maintenance treatments. Page 166 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 42 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Bridge Deck Preservation ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Scott NutterLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 - Capital Expenditures:Design- 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 - 70,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 - 630,000 Total Expenditures:- 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000 TIP# P-4Description:This is a annual program to fund the rehabilitation of bridge decks as identified by the City's annual bridge inspection program. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 167 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 43 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Bridge Structure Preservation ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Scott NutterLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 20,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - 45,000 - 45,000 - 45,000 - 45,000 180,000 Total Expenditures:- - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 200,000 TIP# P-5BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.Description:This is an bi-annual program to fund improvements to bridge structues identified by the City's annual bridge inspection program.Progress Summary: Page 168 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 44 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: 15th Street SW Reconstruction STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 12Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources: Prior to 2019 Estimate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Beyond 2025 Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- - 75,000 500,000 - - - - - 575,000 Unsecured Grant- - 300,000 2,500,000 - - - - - 2,800,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 375,000 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,375,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - 375,000 - - - - - - 375,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - 375,000 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,375,000 TIP# P-6Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This project will evaluate improvements to the Union Pacific at grade rail crossings as well as the vertical sight distance to the Interurban Trail crossing to the west of the tracks. This project was originally scoped to include pavement preservation. The pavement preservation component could still be combined with this project, but is also eligible for the Arterial Pavement Preservation Program. A planning level cost estimate is provided. Progress Summary:An application for grant funding for the project is being considered in 2019. If awarded, design would occur in 2020 and construction in 2021. Page 169 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 45 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE)STIP# AUB-56Project No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Jeff BenderLOS Corridor ID# 1/2Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- 120,000 618,280 - - - - - - 738,280 Secured Federal Grant- - 889,720 - - - - - - 889,720 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 120,000 1,508,000 - - - - - - 1,628,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 120,000 - - - - - - - 120,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - 1,508,000 - - - - - - 1,508,000 Total Expenditures:- 120,000 1,508,000 - - - - - - 1,628,000 TIP# P-7Description:This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from the 22nd Street NE to 8th Street NE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements.Progress Summary:Federal Grant funding was awarded in 2016.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Costs Page 170 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 46 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (4th St SE to 8th St NE)STIP# AUB-57Project No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:Jeff BenderLOS Corridor ID# 2Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostArterial Preservation Fund- 111,220 863,920 - - - - - - 975,140 Secured Federal Grant- 111,220 863,920 - - - - - - 975,140 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 222,440 1,727,840 - - - - - - 1,950,280 Capital Expenditures:Design- 222,440 - - - - - - - 222,440 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - 1,727,840 - - - - - - 1,727,840 Total Expenditures:- 222,440 1,727,840 - - - - - - 1,950,280 TIP# P-8Description: This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from approximately 8th Street NE to approximately 4th St SE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements.Progress Summary:Federal Grant funding was awarded in 2016.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Costs Page 171 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 47 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: A Street SE Preservation (37th Street SE to King/Pierce County Line)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 10Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostArterial Preservation Fund- - - - - 67,500 788,000 - - 855,500 Unsecured Grant- - - - - 67,500 788,000 - - 855,500 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 135,000 1,576,000 - - 1,711,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 135,000 - - - 135,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 1,576,000 - - 1,576,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 135,000 1,576,000 - - 1,711,000 TIP# P-10Description:The project will grind and overlay A Street SE from 37th Street SE to the Auburn/Pacific City Limit and from the Pacific/Auburn City Limit to the King/Pierce County Line (approximately 1,800 feet to the south of Lakeland Hills Way). The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps and replacement of vehicle detection loops.Progress Summary:An application for grant funding for the construction phase of this project is anticipated to be submitted in 2020. If awarded, design would occur in 2023 and construction in 2024.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 172 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 48 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: C Street SW Preservation (W Main St to GSA Signal)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 13Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostArterial Preservation Fund- - - - - 182,000 871,500 - - 1,053,500 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 1,254,000 - - 1,254,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 182,000 2,125,500 - - 2,307,500 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 182,000 - - - 182,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 2,125,500 - - 2,125,500 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 182,000 2,125,500 - - 2,307,500 TIP# P-11Description:The project will grind and overlay C Street SW from W Main Street to the GSA signal (approximately 2,000 feet to the south of 15th Street SW). The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps and pedestrian push buttons, and replacement of vehicle detection loops.Progress Summary:An application for grant funding for the construction phase of this project is anticipated to be submitted in 2020. If awarded, design would occur in 2023 and construction in 2024.Future Impact on Operating Budget:No impact.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 173 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 49 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL PRESERVATION FUND (105)Project Title: Lakeland Hill Way Preservation (57th Drive SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:PreservationProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 26Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostArterial Preservation Fund- - 100,000 352,000 - - - - - 452,000 Secured Federal Grant- - - 748,000 - - - - - 748,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 100,000 1,100,000 - - - - - 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - 100,000 - - - - - - 100,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - 1,100,000 - - - - - 1,100,000 Total Expenditures:- - 100,000 1,100,000 - - - - - 1,200,000 TIP# P-12Description:The project will grind, patch, and overlay Lakeland Hills Way from 57th Drive SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy. The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps and replacement of vehicle detection loops.Progress Summary:Grant funding for the construction phase of this project was awarded in 2018. Future Impact on Operating Budget:No impact.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 174 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preservation Projects 50 Page 175 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 51 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanCAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Project Title: Neighborhood Traffic Safety ProgramSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:VariesProject Type:Non-CapacityProject Manager:Joe WelshLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostFund Balance- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - REET 2- 50,000 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 850,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 50,000 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 850,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- 10,000 10,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 - 95,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- 40,000 40,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 135,000 - 755,000 Total Expenditures:- 50,000 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 850,000 TIP# R-1BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.Description:This project will implement neighborhood traffic calming strategies, speed cushions, signage, speed radar signs, mini roundabouts, chicanes, traffic circles, and other approved traffic calming devices and techniques. Projects will be selected annually based on engineering studies. Requests for engineering studies may come from questions/complaints from residents, neighborhood meetings, and/or police concerns.Progress Summary: Page 176 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 52 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: I Street NE Corridor (45th St NE to S 277th St) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:c415a0Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees3,892 - - - - - - - - 3,892 Other Sources (Development)- - - - 6,760,000 - - - - 6,760,000 Other (Port of Seattle)- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:3,892 - - - 6,760,000 - - - - 6,763,892 Capital Expenditures:Design3,892 - - - 460,000 - - - - 463,892 Right of Way- - - - 1,020,000 - - - - 1,020,000 Construction- - - - 5,280,000 - - - - 5,280,000 Total Expenditures:3,892 - - - 6,760,000 - - - - 6,763,892 TIP# R-2Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,200.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:The final alignment of the I Street Corridor was analyzed as part of the Northeast Auburn Special Area Plan Environmental Impact Study. A portion of the ROW and construction will be developer funded. The cross section will likely be a 5-lane arterial per the city's Comprehensive Plan.Progress Summary:This project is development driven. Prior expenditures were for design and construction of culvert crossing. Page 177 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 53 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:c201a0Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:Ryan VondrakLOS Corridor ID# 6Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources: Prior to 2019 Estimate 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Beyond 2025 Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Secured Grants (Fed,State)9,731,904 - - - - - - - - 9,731,904 REET21,140,000 - - - - - - - - 1,140,000 Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)4,309,782 - - - - - - - - 4,309,782 Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)643,708 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 1,911,668 3,415,275 Traffic Mitigation Fees660,000 - - - - - - - - 660,000 PWTFL (30 years)3,284,857 - - - - - - - - 3,284,857 Other (Agencies)3,090,514 - - - - - - - - 3,090,514 Total Funding Sources:22,217,057 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 1,911,668 22,347,475 Capital Expenditures:Design2,688,924 - - - - - - - - 2,688,924 Right of Way3,358,443 - - - - - - - - 3,358,443 Construction16,169,690 - - - - - - - - 16,169,690 PWTF Debt Service643,708 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 1,911,668 3,415,275 Total Expenditures:22,217,057 123,720 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 1,911,668 22,347,475 Future Impact on Operating Budget:BudgetForecast Project CostTIP# R-3Description:Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks. Progress Summary:Construction was completed in 2014. The project is now in Public Works Trust Fund Loan (PWTFL) debt repayment. Page 178 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 54 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: A Street LoopSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - 70,000 - 270,000 - - - - 340,000 Other (Sound Transit) - - 280,000 - 1,080,000 - - - - 1,360,000 Total Funding Sources:- - 350,000 - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,700,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - 350,000 - - - - - - 350,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,350,000 Total Expenditures:- - 350,000 - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,700,000 TIP # R-4Description:The project will design and construct a new one-way (eastbound) roadway connection between A Street SW and A Street SE. The new intersection with A Street SE will allow an unsignalized right-turn movement onto sounthbound A Street SE, providing an alternative to the intersection of 2nd/3rd Street SE and A Street SE. The roadway will be constructed as a complete street to accomodate non-motorized road users. Progress Summary:Grant funding for the design phase was applied for from Sound Transit in 2019.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,500.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 179 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 55 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - 1,325,000 - - 1,325,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 350,000 - - - 350,000 Other (Developer)150,000 - - - - - 1,325,000 - - 1,475,000 Total Funding Sources:150,000 - - - - 350,000 2,650,000 - - 3,150,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way- - - - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Construction150,000 - - - - - 2,650,000 - - 2,800,000 Total Expenditures:150,000 - - - - 350,000 2,650,000 - - 3,150,000 TIP# R-5Future Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Construct a three-lane arterial from W Main St to 3rd St NW. This project will improve the connection between the A St NW Extension, (Phase 1) and Auburn Station and Central Business District. This project could be partially or fully funded by development and/or Sound Transit's parking garage/access improvements. The project is approximately 0.2 miles long.Progress Summary:The parking garage constructed by the Auburn Regional Medical Center completed a portion of this project in 2009. Page 180 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 56 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Way S Widening (Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1622Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 4Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Secured Federal Grant- 648,750 648,750 - - - - - - 1,297,500 Unsecured Federal Grant- - - - 5,800,000 5,800,000 - - - 11,600,000 Traffic Impact Fees- 101,250 851,250 750,000 1,450,000 1,450,000 - - - 4,602,500 Total Funding Sources:- 750,000 1,500,000 750,000 7,250,000 7,250,000 - - - 17,500,000 Capital Expenditures:Pre-Design- - - - - - - - - - Design- 750,000 750,000 - - - - - - 1,500,000 Right of Way- - 750,000 750,000 - - - - - 1,500,000 Construction- - - - 7,250,000 7,250,000 - - - 14,500,000 Total Expenditures:- 750,000 1,500,000 750,000 7,250,000 7,250,000 - - - 17,500,000 TIP# R-6Description:Widen Auburn Way S between Hemlock St SE and Poplar St SE to accomodate two general purpose lanes in each direction, turn lanes, access management where feasible, U-turns, curb, gutter, sidewalk, illumination, transit stop improvements, a new traffic signal at Noble Court, Intelligent Transportation Systems, streetscape and storm improvements. The project length is approximately 0.4 miles.Progress Summary:The project will extend corridor improvements along Auburn Way S recently completed under previous projects. Grant funding for the design and ROW phases was applied for in 2018.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,000.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 181 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 57 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:asbd12Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 5Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - 750,000 - - 750,000 Unsecured State Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 350,000 100,000 400,000 - - 850,000 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 350,000 100,000 1,150,000 - - 1,600,000 Capital Expenditures:Pre-Design- - - - - - - - - - Design- - - - 350,000 - - - - 350,000 Right of Way- - - - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Construction- - - - - - 1,150,000 - 1,150,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 350,000 100,000 1,150,000 - - 1,600,000 TIP# R-7Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This project will construct a complete four/five-lane street section on M St NE between south of E Main St and 4th St NE, and reconstruct the signal at E Main St.Progress Summary: Page 182 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 58 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 49th Street NE (Auburn Way N to I St NE)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (Development) - - - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - - 3,350,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - - 3,350,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Right of Way- - - - 600,000 - - - - 600,000 Construction- - - - - 2,500,000 - - - 2,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - - 3,350,000 TIP# R-8BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $27,050.Description:Construct a new east/west corridor from Auburn Way N to I St NE. The existing 49th Street corridor extends B St NW to the west. This project also includes a traffic signal at the intersection of Auburn Way N and 49th Street with accomodations for u-turns on Auburn Way N. This roadway was evaluated and recommended in the NE Auburn Special Area Plan. It is anticipated that this will be constructed by future development. It is approximately 0.75 miles long. Progress Summary: Page 183 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 59 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 46th Place S RealignmentSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - 300,000 540,000 840,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 75,000 135,000 210,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - 125,000 - 125,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - 250,000 - 250,000 Construction- - - - - - - - 675,000 675,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000 TIP# R-9BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.Description:The project will realign 46th Place S to the south of S 321st Street. The realignment will move the 46th Place S intersection with S 321st Street approximately 350 feet to the east of the current location. This will create two T-intersections (44th Avenue S and 46th Place S) in place of the existing four-leg intersection. The existing 46th Place S will be dead-ended to the south of S 321st Street. The project will improve safety and traffic operations at the intersections. Progress Summary:A portion of the right-of-way for the realigned roadway was dedicated as part of an adjacent development project. Page 184 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 60 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Way N/S (4th St NE to 4th St SE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:c409a0Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 2, 3Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue78,251 - - - - 50,000 300,000 100,000 1,500,000 2,028,251 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 REET- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - 300,000 100,000 500,000 900,000 Other Sources- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:78,251 - - - - 50,000 600,000 200,000 3,500,000 4,428,251 Capital Expenditures:Design78,251 - - - - 50,000 600,000 - - 728,251 Right of Way- - - - - - - 200,000 - 200,000 Construction- - - - - - - - 3,500,000 3,500,000 Total Expenditures:78,251 - - - - 50,000 600,000 200,000 3,500,000 4,428,251 TIP# R-10BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.Description:This project is based on a pre-design study to improve pedestrian accessibility, appearance, and link the downtown area along Auburn Way S between 4th Street NE and 4th Street SE. The project is approximately 0.5 miles long. The project would construct curb-bulbs at intersections adjacent to on-street parking, a new northbound left-turn at 3rd Street NE, and improvements to the signal and channelization at E Main Street. Progress Summary: Page 185 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 61 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th St to SE 318th St)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 23Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - 300,000 880,000 2,000,000 - 3,180,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 100,000 220,000 500,000 - 820,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Pre-Design- - - - - - - - - - Design- - - - - 400,000 - - - 400,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Construction- - - - - - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000 TIP# R-11BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.Description:This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of a four-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities on 124th Ave SE between SE 318th St and SE 312th St, and improvements to the signalized intersection of SE 312th St and 124th Ave SE (including adding bike lanes, dual westbound left-turn lanes, dual southbound through-lanes, a northbound right-turn pocket, ITS improvements, and pedestrian safety improvements).Progress Summary:Phase 1 improvements between SE 318th and SE 316th were completed by Green River College in 2012. Page 186 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 62 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: R Street Bypass (M Street SE to SR-18)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 150,000 - 150,000 Other (Development)- - - - - - - 500,000 5,700,000 6,200,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - - 650,000 5,700,000 6,350,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - 650,000 - 650,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - 1,800,000 1,800,000 Construction- - - - - - - - 3,900,000 3,900,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - - 650,000 5,700,000 6,350,000 TIP# R-12BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $7,500.Description:This project will complete the design and construction of the Bypass Rd, an arterial connection between M Street SE and Auburn Black Diamond Road, paralleling the Stampede Pass rail line. The project will provide an arterial connection from the newly constructed M Street Underpass to the Auburn Black Diamond Road interchange with SR-18 to keep both vehicular and freight traffic out of residential neighborhoods along R Street SE north of the Stampede Pass line. The arterial connection may also provide opportunities for partnering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe as they redevelop the Miles Pit area and as more definitive plans are developed for a potential new WSDOT interchange on SR-18 in the vicinity of the project.Progress Summary: Page 187 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 63 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: SE 320th Street Corridor Improvements (116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave SE)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Capacity, SafetyProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 25Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - 340,000 556,000 2,000,000 - - 2,896,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 85,000 139,000 500,000 - - 724,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 425,000 695,000 2,500,000 - - 3,620,000 Capital Expenditures:Pre-Design- - - - - - - - - - Design- - - - 425,000 - - - 425,000 Right of Way- - - - - 695,000 - - - 695,000 Construction- - - - - - 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 425,000 695,000 2,500,000 - - 3,620,000 TIP# R-13BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000.Description:SE 320th St is a primary route serving Green River College and adjacent neighborhoods. There are very high volumes of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit utilizing the corridor. This project will fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of non-motorized roadway and safety improvements including bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and streetlighting between 122nd Ave SE and 116th Ave SE. Project length is approximately .45 miles.Progress Summary:GRC completed the design and construction of the segment between 124th Ave SE and 122nd Ave SE in 2013. The schedule for this project is dependent on the availability of grant funding. Page 188 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 64 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: W Valley Highway Improvements (15th Street NW to W Main Street)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 35Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 2,400,000 - - 2,400,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - 250,000 600,000 - - 850,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - 250,000 3,000,000 - - 3,250,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - 250,000 3,000,000 - - 3,250,000 TIP# R-14Description:This project scope includes pavement rehabilitation and re-channelization, roadway widening, bicycle lanes, pedestrian facilities, roadway lighting, ITS, and required storm system improvements.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $5,000. BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 189 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 65 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Way S (SR-164) Poplar Curve Safety ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1901Project Type:Safety, Non-CapacityProject Manager:Jeff BenderLOS Corridor ID# 4Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- 5,500 - - - - - - - 5,500 Secured State Grant- 49,500 213,200 - - - - - - 262,700 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- 55,000 213,200 - - - - - - 268,200 Capital Expenditures:Design- 55,000 - - - - - - - 55,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - 213,200 - - - - - - 213,200 Total Expenditures:- 55,000 213,200 - - - - - - 268,200 TIP# R-15Description:This project will complete design and construct safety improvements at the curve along Auburn Way S in the vicinity of the intersection with Poplar Street. The improvements would include, illumination, electronic curve ahead warning signage, a high-friction surface treatment for the pavement, guardrail and driveway improvements.Progress Summary:Grant funding was awarded in 2018. If secured the design phase will be started in 2019 and construction completed during 2020.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 190 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 66 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Regional Growth Center Access ImprovementsSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - 325,000 - 1,300,000 - - - 1,625,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - 85,000 100,000 200,000 - - - 385,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - 410,000 100,000 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - 410,000 - - - - - 410,000 Right of Way- - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Construction- - - - - 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - 410,000 100,000 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000 TIP# R-16Description:The project would improve the 3rd Street NE/4th Street NE intersections with Auburn Avenue and Auburn Way N. The goals of the project are to improve traffic operations, safey, and circulation for both vehicles and non-motorized users. The project will add a northbound left-turn movement and a northbound/southbound crosswalk at the 3rd Street NE intersection with Auburn Avenue, and realign the intersection of 4th St NE with Auburn Way N to eliminate the split phase operation signal improving circulation and access.Progress Summary:Grant funding for the design phase was applied for from Sound Transit in 2019.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact to the street maintenance budget.BudgetForecast Project Costs Page 191 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 67 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: M Street SE Improvements (8th St SE to Auburn Way S)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 6Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 975,000 4,200,000 - 5,175,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000 Other (Development)- - - - - - 325,000 300,000 - 625,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - 2,050,000 5,250,000 - 7,300,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - 725,000 - - 725,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 1,325,000 - - 1,325,000 Construction- - - - - - - 5,250,000 - 5,250,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - 2,050,000 5,250,000 - 7,300,000 TIP# R-17Future Impact on Operating Budget:This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $15,000.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Widen M Street SE into a multi-lane arterial between 8th St SE and Auburn Way S, including the construction of a new traffic signal at the intersection with 12th Street SE. This project will improve mobility and is tied to corridor development. It is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and contributes to the completion of a north/south arterial corridor.Progress Summary: Page 192 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 68 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: SR-18 to Auburn Way S (SR-164) BypassSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:N/AProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:N/ALOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (WSDOT)1,500,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 5,000,000 - - - 15,000,000 Other (Development)3,500,000 6,500,000 - - 7,500,000 7,500,000 - - - 25,000,000 Total Funding Sources:5,000,000 10,000,000 - - 12,500,000 12,500,000 - - - 40,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design5,000,000 - - - - - - - - 5,000,000 Right of Way- 10,000,000 - - - - - - - 10,000,000 Construction- - - - 12,500,000 12,500,000 - - - 25,000,000 Total Expenditures:5,000,000 10,000,000 - - 12,500,000 12,500,000 - - - 40,000,000 TIP# R-18BudgetForecast Project CostFuture Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $37,500.Description:This project is anticipated to permit and construct a new interchange on SR-18 and could also include a new roadway connection to Auburn Way S (SR-164). This will create a bypass of Auburns' urban center for vehicles destined to/from the Muckleshoot Reservation and regional traffic to the Enumclaw area.Progress Summary:This project was originally analyzed by WSDOT's Auburn Way S (SR-164) Route Development Plan. The State Leglature allocated $15 Million through Connecting Washington for the new eastbound SR-18 off-ramp serving this bypass road in 2017-2019. The route of the new roadway will be determined after completion of a feasibility study. Page 193 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 69 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Auburn Way S Streetscape Improvements (SR-18 to M St SE)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:MiscellaneousProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 3Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - 200,000 200,000 - 400,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - 1,650,000 2,450,000 - 4,100,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - 1,850,000 2,650,000 - 4,500,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 Right of Way- - - - - - 1,450,000 - - 1,450,000 Construction- - - - - - - 2,650,000 - 2,650,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - 1,850,000 2,650,000 - 4,500,000 TIP# R-19Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:This project will revitalize and beautify Auburn Way S from the SR-18 interchange to the intersection with M Street SE. Proposed improvements include: improved pedestrian linkages; new and repaired sidewalks; curb and gutter; new landscaped medians; undergounding existing aerial utilities, new street lighting; trash receptacles; recycling containers and other appropriate amenities.Progress Summary: Page 194 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 70 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (Harvey Rd/M St NE to 105th Pl SE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1806Project Type:CapacityProject Manager:Kim TruongLOS Corridor ID# 19Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - 2,310,000 4,400,000 4,400,000 - 11,110,000 Traffic Impact Fees730,000 100,000 - - - 590,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 - 3,620,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:730,000 100,000 - - - 2,900,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 14,730,000 Capital Expenditures:Design300,000 100,000 - - - 2,150,000 - - - 2,550,000 Right of Way430,000 - - - - 750,000 - - - 1,180,000 Construction- - - - - - 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 11,000,000 Total Expenditures:730,000 100,000 - - - 2,900,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 14,730,000 TIP# R-20Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $18,300.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Widen the existing roadway to provide a four/five-lane cross section with intersection improvements and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.Progress Summary:Two parcels along the future roadway alignment were purchased by the City in 2014, and a third in 2016. Corridor pre-design study started in 2018. Page 195 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 71 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 19Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - 2,900,000 7,100,000 10,000,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 600,000 1,400,000 2,000,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 Construction- - - - - - - - 8,500,000 8,500,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000 TIP# R-21Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $24,100.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Project includes widening the existing roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle facilities.Progress Summary: Page 196 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 72 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 19Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - 750,000 2,500,000 3,250,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - 250,000 500,000 750,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - - 1,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Construction- - - - - - - - 3,000,000 3,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - - 1,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 TIP# R-22Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $20,300.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Project includes widening the existing roadway to provide a four-lane cross-section including pedestrian and bicycle facilities.Progress Summary: Page 197 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 73 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: W Valley Highway Improvements (SR-18 to 15th St SW)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 35Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - 320,000 1,600,000 - - - 1,920,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - - 80,000 400,000 - - - 480,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 400,000 2,000,000 - - - 2,400,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - 400,000 - - - - 400,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - 2,000,000 - - - 2,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 400,000 2,000,000 - - - 2,400,000 TIP# R-23Description:This project scope includes pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements, improved roadway lighting, required storm system improvements, intersection signal replacement at 15th St SW, and Intelligent Transportation System Improvements.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:This annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 198 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 74 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:N/AProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:City of PacificLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - 66,000 - - - - 66,000 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees- - - - 34,000 - - - - 34,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - - - - Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 TIP# R-24Description:This is a City of Pacific project to widen the Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor. This is the final segment of widening in the City of Pacific which will tie in with the City of Sumner's planned final widening segment and new bridge over the White River. Completion of this corridor widening is expected to significantly relieve traffic congestion in Auburn along the A St SE and C St SE corridors.Progress Summary:City of Pacific has initiated preliminary road design and is applying for grant funding to complete the project.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no future impact to Auburn's operating budgets.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 199 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 75 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: R St SE Corridor ExtensionSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# N/AActivity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - - - - - - - - - Other (Development)- - - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 - 10,000,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 - 10,000,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - - 8,000,000 - 8,000,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 - 10,000,000 TIP# R-25Description:This project will construct a new segment of R St SE approximately 0.7 miles long between 17th St SE and the future bypass road connecting M St SE and Auburn-Black Diamond Road.Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,000.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 200 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 76 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: E Valley Highway WideningSTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 10Activity:2019 YETotal ProjectFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - 200,000 960,000 - - - 1,160,000 Traffic Impact Fees- - - 300,000 50,000 240,000 - - - 590,000 Other (Development)- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - 300,000 250,000 1,200,000 - - - 1,750,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - 300,000 - - - - - 300,000 Right of Way- - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Construction- - - - - 1,200,000 - - - 1,200,000 Total Expenditures:- - - 300,000 250,000 1,200,000 - - - 1,750,000 TIP# R-26Description:This project will widen E Valley Highway between Lakeland Hills Way and Terrace View Drive SE, approximately 0.6 miles. The roadway will have a four/five lane cross section with a trail connection along the east side. Other project elements include storm improvement, illumination and ITS. Progress Summary:Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,000.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 201 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 77 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: Lea Hill Rd Segment 1A (Garden Avenue)STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:TBDProject Type:Safety, CapacityProject Manager:TBDLOS Corridor ID# 19Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - 150,000 350,000 - - - - - 500,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 150,000 350,000 - - - - - 500,000 Capital Expenditures:Design- - 75,000 - - - - - - 75,000 Right of Way- - 75,000 - - - - - - 75,000 Construction- - - 350,000 - - - - - 350,000 Total Expenditures:- - 150,000 350,000 - - - - - 500,000 TIP# R-27Description:Phase 1A of the Lea Hill Road corridor project will create a new east/west connection between Garden Avenue and 104th Avenue SE, and will cul-de-sac Garden Avenue to the north of 8th Street NE.Progress Summary:Two parcels along the future roadway alignment were purchased by the City in 2014, and a third in 2016. Corridor pre-design study started in 2018.Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000.BudgetForecast Project CostPage 202 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Roadway Projects 78 Page 203 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 79 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) STIP# AUB-N/AProject No:c207a0Project Type:Environmental MonitoringProject Manager:Tim CarlawLOS Corridor ID# 18Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue123,276 - - - - - - - - 123,276 Secured Grants (Fed,State)6,562,702 - - - - - - - - 6,562,702 Traffic Impact Fees1,271,660 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - - 1,371,660 Other (Developer)383,381 - - - - - - - - 383,381 Total Funding Sources:8,341,019 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - - 8,441,019 Capital Expenditures:Design2,247,331 - - - - - - - - 2,247,331 Right of Way821,341 - - - - - - - - 821,341 Construction5,000,640 - - - - - - - - 5,000,640 Monitoring271,707 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - - 371,707 Total Expenditures:8,341,019 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - - 8,441,019 TIP# S-1Future Impact on Operating Budget:The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $25,830.BudgetForecast Project CostProgress Summary:Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final design and environmental permitting were completed in 2011. Construction was completed in 2012. The project is now in the wetland maintenance monitoring period required until 2023.Description:Constructed a new multi-lane arterial from 3rd Street NW to 14th Street NW completing a missing link along the corridor. This project improves mobility and was tied to corridor development. The project length was approximately three-quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the northern property owner. If the property develops any access to A St NW, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251,000). Page 204 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 80 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: S 277th St Corridor Capacity and Non-Motorized Trail ImprovementsSTIP# N/AProject No:CP1821Project Type:Environmental MonitoringProject Manager:Tim CarlawLOS Corridor ID# 15Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue- - - - - - - - - - Unsecured Fed/State Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees7,641 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 187,641 Other - - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:7,641 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 187,641 Capital Expenditures:Design- - - - - - - - - - Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - - - - - Monitoring7,641 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 187,641 Total Expenditures:7,641 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 187,641 TIP# S-2Description:This project will compelte the environmental monitoring requirements related to the S 277th St corridor widening project between Auburn Way North and l St NE.Progress Summary:10 year monitoring period is expected to begin in 2018 after final completion and continue through 2028.Future Impact on Operating Budget:There is no impact on future operating budgets.BudgetForecast Project Cost Page 205 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 81 Six Year Transportation Improvement PlanARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Project Title: A Street SE Corridor StudySTIP# AUB-N/AProject No:CP1110Project Type:Safety and CapacityProject Manager:James WebbLOS Corridor ID# 10, 33Activity:2019 YEFunding Sources:Prior to 2019Estimate202020212022202320242025Beyond 2025Total Project CostUnrestricted Street Revenue1,230 - 55,000 - - - - - - 56,230 Unsecured Grant- - - - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees- - 50,000 - - - - - - 50,000 Other- - - - - - - - - - Total Funding Sources:1,230 - 105,000 - - - - - - 106,230 Capital Expenditures:Design1,230 - 105,000 - - - - - - 106,230 Right of Way- - - - - - - - - - Construction- - - - - - - - Total Expenditures:1,230 - 105,000 - - - - - - 106,230 TIP# S-3Future Impact on Operating Budget:This study will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance.BudgetForecast Project CostDescription:Study the A Street SE corridor between 6th Street SE and Lakeland Hills Way SE including 41st St SE from D St SE to C St SE. The study will review the safety and access needs of the traveling public and the adjacent properties.Progress Summary:In-house pre-design was completed to refine project scope, alignment, and identify design issues. 2019 design will complete conceptual corridor plan for future improvements. Page 206 of 245
City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Program Preliminary Engineering and Miscellaneous Projects 82 Page 207 of 245
City of Auburn
2020-2025
Transportation Improvement Program Summary
Project
Number
TIP
#Project Title Grant
Status Prior to 2020 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Beyond 2025
Total Project
Cost
cpxxxx I-1 Signal Replacement Program N/A 150,000 50,000 525,000 - - 200,000 525,000 - 1,450,000
Various I-2 Traffic Signal Improvements N/A 175,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,375,000
cpxxxx I-3 ITS Dynamic Message Signs N/A 321,820 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 - 20,000 125,000 736,820
Various I-4 Street Lighting Improvement Program N/A 50,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 600,000
cp0611 I-5 Harvey Rd NE/8th St NE Intersection Improvements N/A 1,065,678 84,000 83,598 83,196 82,794 82,392 81,990 243,561 1,807,209
cpxxxx I-6 Lake Tapps Parkway ITS Expansion Secured 108,572 900,000 - - - - - - 1,008,572
cpxxxx I-7 SE 320th St/116th Ave SE Roundabout Unsecured - - - - 325,000 30,000 1,370,000 - 1,725,000
cpxxxx I-8 29th St SE/R St SE Intersection Improvements Unsecured - - - 450,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,450,000
cpxxxx I-9 M St SE/29th St SE Intersection Improvements Unsecured - - - - 200,000 800,000 - - 1,000,000
cpxxxx I-10 R St SE/21st St SE Intersection Improvements N/A - - 150,000 800,000 - - - - 950,000
cpxxxx I-11 Auburn Way S/6th St SE Intersection Improvements Unsecured - - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 - 785,000
cp0820 I-12 C St SW/15th St SW Intersection Improvements Unsecured - - - - 200,000 1,000,000 - - 1,200,000
cpxxxx I-13 124th Ave SE/SE 320th St Intersection Improvements Unsecured - - - - 350,000 1,600,000 - - 1,950,000
cpxxxx I-14
124th Ave SE/SE 284th St Intersection Safety
Improvements Unsecured - - - - - 100,000 600,000 - 700,000
cpxxxx I-15 10th St NW/A St NW Intersection Improvements N/A - - - 175,000 475,000 - - - 650,000
Various N-1 Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program N/A 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000
Various N-2 ADA and Sidewalk Improvement Program N/A 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - 1,400,000
Various N-3 Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvement Program N/A 90,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 100,000 490,000
NA N-4 Transit Partnership Routes N/A 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 - 2,800,000
cp1416 N-5 F St SE Non-Motorized Improvements Secured 690,000 3,300,000 - - - - - - 3,990,000
cpxxxx N-6 Auburn Station Access Improvements Unsecured - - - 125,000 - - - - 125,000
cpxxxx N-7 Auburn Way S - Southside Sidewalk Improvements Unsecured - - 95,000 750,000 - - - - 845,000
cpxxxx N-8 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to Schools Unsecured 247,000 - - - - - 410,000 2,270,000 2,927,000
cpxxxx N-9 Riverwalk Drive Non-Motorized Improvements Unsecured - - - - 250,000 1,100,000 - - 1,350,000
cpxxxx N-11 Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools Unsecured - - - - 1,420,000 387,000 - - 1,807,000
Various P-1 Arterial Street Preservation Program N/A 1,000,000 1,100,000 400,000 1,200,000 1,675,000 1,300,000 1,750,000 - 8,425,000
Various P-2 Local Streets Improvement Program N/A 2,550,000 1,900,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 - 12,700,000
cpxxxx P-4 Bridge Deck Preservation Program N/A 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - 700,000
cp1008 P-5 Annual Bridge Structure Preservation Program N/A - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 - 50,000 200,000
cpxxxx P-6 15th St SW Reconstruction Unsecured - 375,000 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,375,000
cpxxxx P-7
Auburn Way N Preservation Ph 2 (8th St NE to 22nd
St NE)Secured 120,000 1,508,000 - - - - - - 1,628,000
cpxxxx P-8
Auburn Way N Preservation Ph 3 (4th St SE to 8th St
NE)Secured 222,440 1,727,840 - - - - - - 1,950,280
cpxxxx P-10
A St SE Preservation (37th St SE to King/Pierce
County Line)Unsecured - - - - 135,000 1,576,000 - - 1,711,000
cpxxxx P-11 C Street SW Preservation (W Main St to GSA Signal) Unsecured - - - - 182,000 2,125,500 - - 2,307,500
cpxxxx P-12
Lakeland Hills Way Preservation (57th Dr SE to Lake
Tapps Pkwy)Secured - 100,000 1,100,000 - - - - - 1,200,000
c409a0 R-1 Traffic Calming N/A 50,000 50,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 - 850,000
c415a0 R-2 I Street NE Corridor (45th St NE to S 277th St) N/A 3,892 - - 6,760,000 - - - - 6,763,892
c201a0 R-3 M Street Underpass N/A 19,699,628 123,428 123,135 122,843 122,550 122,258 121,965 1,911,668 22,347,475
cpxxxx R-4 A Street Loop Unsecured - 350,000 - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,700,000
cpxxxx R-5 A St NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW) Unsecured 150,000 - - - 350,000 2,650,000 - - 3,150,000
cpxxxx R-6
Auburn Way S Widening (Hemlock St SE to Poplar St
SE)Unsecured 750,000 1,500,000 750,000 7,250,000 7,250,000 - - - 17,500,000
cpxxxx R-7 M St NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) N/A - - - 350,000 100,000 1,150,000 - - 1,600,000
cpxxxx R-8 49th St NE (Auburn Way N to I St NE) N/A - - - 850,000 2,500,000 - - - 3,350,000
cpxxxx R-9 46th Place S Realignment Unsecured - - - - - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000
cpxxxx R-10 Auburn Way Corridor (4th St NE to 4th St SE) Unsecured 78,251 - - - 50,000 600,000 200,000 3,500,000 4,428,251
cpxxxx R-11
124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th St to
SE 318th St)Unsecured - - - - 400,000 1,100,000 2,500,000 - 4,000,000
cpxxxx R-12 R Street Bypass (M St SE to SR-18) N/A - - - - - - 650,000 5,700,000 6,350,000
cpxxxx R-13
SE 320th St Corridor Improvements (116th Ave SE to
122nd Ave SE)Unsecured - - - 425,000 695,000 2,500,000 - - 3,620,000
cpxxxx R-14
W Valley Hwy Improvements (15th St NW to W Main
St)Unsecured - - - - 250,000 3,000,000 - - 3,250,000
cpxxxx R-15 Auburn Way S - Poplar Curve Safety Improvements Secured 55,000 213,200 - - - - - - 268,200
cpxxxx R-16 Regional Growth Center Access Improvements Unsecured - - 410,000 100,000 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000
cpxxxx R-17 M St SE Corridor (8th St SE to Auburn Way S) Unsecured - - - - - 2,050,000 5,250,000 - 7,300,000
cpxxxx R-18 SR-18 to Auburn Way S Bypass N/A 15,000,000 - - 12,500,000 12,500,000 - - - 40,000,000
cpxxxx R-19
Auburn Way S Streetscape Improvements (SR-18 to
M St SE)Unsecured - - - - - 1,850,000 2,650,000 - 4,500,000
cp1806 R-20
Lea Hill Rd Segment 1 (Harvey Rd/M St NE to 105th
Pl SE) Unsecured 830,000 - - - 2,900,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 - 14,730,000
cpxxxx R-21 Lea Hill Rd Segment 2 (105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE) Unsecured - - - - - - 3,500,000 8,500,000 12,000,000
cpxxxx R-22
Lea Hill Rd Segment 3 (112th Ave SE to 124th Ave
SE) Unsecured - - - - - - 1,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000
cpxxxx R-23
W Valley Hwy Improvements (SR-18 to 15th Street
SW)Unsecured - - - 400,000 2,000,000 - - - 2,400,000
cpxxxx R-24 Stewart Road N/A - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000
cpxxxx R-25 R St SE Corridor Extension N/A - - - - - 2,000,000 8,000,000 - 10,000,000
cpxxxx R-26 E Valley Hwy Widening Unsecured - - 300,000 250,000 1,200,000 - - - 1,750,000
cpxxxx R-27 Lea Hill Road Segment 1A (Garden Avenue) Unsecured - 150,000 350,000 - - - - - 500,000
c207a0 S-1 A St NW, Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) N/A 8,366,019 25,000 25,000 25,000 - - - - 8,441,019
cpxxxx S-2 S 277th St Monitoring N/A 27,641 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 40,000 187,641
cp1110 S-3 A St SE Corridor Study N/A 1,230 105,000 - - - - - - 106,230
Total 52,602,171 14,806,468 10,331,733 37,056,039 41,387,344 35,818,150 38,153,955 26,115,229 256,271,089
Appendix A
Page 208 of 245
EDGEWOOD SUMNER
PACIFI C
KENT
PIERCE
COUNTY
KING
COUNTY
ALGONA
LAKETAPPS
THE
OUTLET
COLLECTION
MUCKLESHOOT
CASINO
167
167
18
1856THAVES SE 320TH ST
S297THPL
S 288TH ST
SE 299TH ST
SE 288TH ST
SE318T H WAY 144THAVESE6 5 THAVESSE315TH PL
17TH ST SE
M ST SE37TH ST SE
SE 290TH ST
12TH ST SE SE299TH ST
18TH ST NE
4
6
THP
L
S
B ST SETSTSE6T H ST NE
4TH ST SE
8TH ST SE
26TH ST NE
5 1S T P L N E
14TH ST NE
SE 295TH ST
S
296TH P L
S 300TH PL
31ST ST NE
51ST S T N E
56THAVES25TH ST SE
20TH ST NE
116THAVESE61STAVESM DRNE51STST S E PIKESTNES 292ND ST
W ST NW28TH ST NE
67TH S T S E 130THAVESESE 316TH ST
33RD ST SE
66TH ST SE50THSTSE
12TH ST SE
5 9 T H STSE
SE 296TH ST
4TH ST NE
26TH ST SE
7 2 N D ST SE
22ND ST SE
BENNETTAVESE32ND ST NE
S 292ND ST
ELM LN SE 114THPLSES 296TH ST
53RD ST SE
73RD S T SE
6 3 R DPLSE
10TH ST SE SE321ST PL
ELMSTSE55THAVESS E 314TH PL
SE288TH P L
56TH ST SE
SE 314THPL
2N D S T S E
S 30 0TH ST
21ST ST SE
2 3 RD ST SE58THAVES
63R D ST SE
LAKE TAPPSDR SE
6 2 N D ST SE52NDPLS50THSTNE
67TH LNSE
SE305THPL
4TH ST NE
19THPLSEUDALLAVESE19TH DR N E
22ND ST NE24THSTNW
EVERGREENW A Y SE
SE 307TH PL
43 R D ST NE
3RD ST SE
3 0 TH ST NE
49THSTSE
SE 301ST ST
57TH ST S E
3 7 T H W A Y SE104THAVESE27TH S TS E
60T H ST S E
MAPLE DR SE
24TH ST NE
6 5TH ST SE
55TH ST SE
QUINCYAVESESE 316TH PLVSTNE 116THAVESED ST SE2 6TH ST SEH ST SE2ND ST SE
SE 298TH PL
S 322ND ST
OLIVEAVESE105THAVESES 305TH ST
SE 293RD S T
O
LIVEAVESESE 310TH ST
C ST SE2ND ST S E
DOGWOOD ST SE1ST ST NE
2ND ST NE
KSTNE2ND ST EK ST SE12TH ST NE
64TH ST S EK ST SE1 7 T H S T S E
1ST ST SW
TH
O
M
A
SAVESEV ST SETSTNWV ST SE43RD STNE
49 T H S T N E33RD ST SEOSTNE14THSTSE
SE300TH WAY
G ST SES DIVISION ST33RD ST S E
S 296TH ST
ISAACAVESE6TH ST SE
26TH ST NE
SE298TH
PL
16TH ST SE
ISTSE2ND ST SE 108 THAVESE
10TH ST N E
E ST SESE307TH PL
S3 31STST
E MAIN ST
55TH ST SE
11TH ST NE
S310TH ST
SE 288TH ST
DOGWOODDRSESE295THST
35TH WAY SES314TH ST20TH ST NW
7TH ST SE 118THAVESE15TH ST SEASTNE15TH ST SE
2 4 T H STSE
D ST SE17 T H ST SERSTNE
61ST ST SE
I PLNEESTSENSTSESE 308THPL
3 2ND ST SE
30TH ST NE
O U TLET COLLECTION WAY SW
8TH ST SE
D ST SED PL SE
EVER G REENWAYS E
13TH ST SE
SE 286TH ST
10TH ST NE
N ST SE22ND ST SE
32ND PL NE
21ST ST SE
27TH ST SEUCTNW
32N D S T SE56THCTS
25TH ST SE
44TH ST NW
7TH ST SE
R PL NE
F ST NWG ST NW56THA
V
E
S
C ST SEH ST NW63RDPLSN ST NEK ST NEJ ST NELSTSESE 282ND ST
176THAVEES307TH S TT ST SE53RD ST SE
5TH ST NE
31ST ST SE
30TH ST SE
37TH ST S ES 288TH ST
65THAVES49TH ST NE
SE 300TH ST
SE 286TH PL
S 324TH ST
O U T L ET COLLECTION
DRSWB PL NW
5 5 TH ST SE
4TH ST SW
SE 294TH ST
42ND ST NE
S 302ND PL
SE 292ND ST
O ST SE120THPLSESE282ND ST
1 07THPLSES 319TH ST
19TH ST S ESE 43RD ST
30TH ST NW
SE 297TH ST
S303RD PL
SE 307T HSTHSTNESE 284TH ST
A L P INEDRSE22ND ST NW
SE 281ST ST
SE 290TH PL
SE 42ND ST
O RAVETZ PLSE
2 8 TH ST SE
WARDAVESEOLYMPICSTSE45THS T NE
J ST SE6TH ST NW
S 312TH ST57TH ST SE
S
E289TH S T
SE 285TH ST
42ND ST NE
S2 9 2 N D S T
22 ND WAY
NE69T H ST S E
20TH ST SE
SE 294TH ST
47THSTSE23RD ST SE
51STSTSE
SE 294TH P LVSTNWDOGWOODLNSEWESTERNAVENW17TH ST NE16TH ST NE
SE 286TH ST
SE326THPLS 318TH ST
G ST SERANDALLAVESE22ND ST SE23RD ST SE
24TH ST SE
25TH ST SE
HEATHERAVESE42ND ST NW 85THAVESLUND RD SW21ST ST NE
36TH STSESE312TH
WAY102NDAVESE37THP L SE
29TH ST NW
SE 301ST ST
SE 287TH ST
47TH ST SE
SE 284TH ST
1
0
5T
H
PLSEH
O
W
A
RD
RD
S
EI ST NW140THAVESES 287TH ST
FOSTERAVESEM OUNTAIN V IEWDRSWEASTBLVDPACIFICAVES41STS T S E JOHNREDDINGTONRDNELSTSEMONTEVISTADRSEM ST NE108THAVESEF ST NEB ST SEFSTSERSTNE55THAVES111THPLSE127THPL
S
EFORES T RIDGEDRSED ST SE129THPLSE55THCTSE
ELIZABETHAVESEELMSTSENATHANAVESEMILLPONDDRSE110THAVESE127THPLSEPERRY AVESE129THAVESEACADEMY
DRSEGSTSEF ST SEGPLSEHEMLOCK ST SE59THAVES112THPLSE64THAVES6 9 THSTSEELM ST SE52NDAVES57THPLSRSTNWVSTNW61STAVESLSTNE49THAVESGINKGOSTSENATH ANL OOPSERIVERDRSEU ST NW55THPLS128THPLSE57THDR
S
ER ST NWELIZABETHAVESE6 8T H ST SERIVERV IE W DR NE
SCENIC
D
R
S
EPIKE ST NEFIR ST SE109THPLSEDOGWOOD ST SEVCTSE111THAVESE52ND PL SJ ST NELSTNELSTSESE 299TH PL
D ST SE62NDLOOP
SEG ST SW1ST S T NEBRIDGETAVESEC ST SE108THAVESEE ST NEQ
U
I
NCYAV
ESE51STAVESAABYDR NW55THAVESVPLSE
HIGHL
ANDDRSE
SE 323 R D PLJ ST NEB ST SEO ST NEPIKE ST NEH ST NEN ST NEEVERGREENWAYS
E118THAVESEH ST SELSTNEZSTSER PL SE 17TH D RSE46THAVES S298 T HPL CSTNEWSTNWE ST NESTUARTPLSETERRACEVIEWLNSEASTE PEARLAVESEF ST SEH ST SEPIKE ST NW142NDAVESE1
0
4
T
H
P
L
S
E
148THAVESEHICRESTDRNWSE 295TH ST
GREENRIVERRDSEGREENRIVERRDSE
54THAVESPERIMETER RD SWU ST NWC ST NECLAYSTNWFRONTAGERDM ST NWSTUCK RIVER DR SE
R-10
R-19
R-19
R-15
R-16
R-5 R-7
R-9
R-3
R-13
R-8
R-12
R-2
R-6
R-23
R-11
R-25
R-22
R-18
R-21
R-14
8T H ST N E
K
E
R
S
E
Y
W
A
Y
SE
H
A
R
V
E
Y
R
D
N
E
E M A I N S T
ASTSEISTNE17TH ST SE 112THAVESEC ST SWEASTVALLEYHWYESE 281ST ST
15TH ST NW
R IVERWALK D RSET
E
R
R
AC
E DRNWW MAINST
R ST SES 316TH ST
3 7TH ST NE
29TH ST SE
SE 304TH ST
LAKE T A P PSPKW YSES 277TH ST
124THAVESEASTSESE 312TH ST51STAVES
15TH ST SW
37T H ST NW
SE 304TH ST
WESTVALLEYHWYNSE 320TH STLEAHILLRDSE
15TH ST NE SE304 T H ST
41ST ST SE SE304THWAY
ASTNWAUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND R D SE
PEASLEY C A NYON RD
S
AUBURN W
AY S 132NDAVESE132NDAVESEWESTVALLEYHWYSA
U
B
U
R
N
W
AYNAUBURN WAY NSUM N E R -TA PPSH
WYEM ST SEMSTSE3R D ST SW 112THAVESE112THAVESER ST SEB ST NWO ST SWL
AKELAND
H
I
L
LS
WAY
SECSTNW M ST NEORAVETZRDSEDSTNWRONCROCKETTDRNW104THAVESEP-6
P-7
P-12
P-9
P-10
P-11
S-1
S-2
S-3
12TH ST E
S
2
72NDW
AY
MILITARYRDS16 TH S T E AUBURN-BLACKDIAMONDRDS E
9TH ST E
214THAVEES 288TH ST
SUMNER-TAPPSHWYEFOR E S T C ANYON R D EMILITARY RD SA
UB
URN-
E
NUMCL
A
WR
D
SWESTVALLEYHWYS
182NDAVEEMILITARY RD S2
1
0
T
HAVEE142NDAVEEJ O V ITAB L V D E 108THAVESES 277TH ST 124THAVESE116THAVESEWESTVALLEYHWYNWS 328TH ST
PACIFICAVES132NDAVESESE 272ND ST
S 272ND ST
24TH ST E
STEWART RD SE
SE 272ND ST
SE
K
E
N
T
-
K
A
N
G
LEY RD
ELLINGSON RD SW
STEWART RD SW 8TH ST E
S E 2 7 4 T H S T
WESTVALLEYHWY68THAVES38THAVESWESTVALLEYHWYS136THAVEE140THAVEEWESTVALLEYHWYES E 27 4 T H S T
124THAVESEEASTVALLEYHWYCENTRALAVESVALENTINEAVESES 277T H S T
73
I-14
I-5
I-8I-9
I-15
I-11
I-1
I-7 I-13
I-10
I-12
I-6
I-6
N-6
N-9
N-8
N-7
N-5
N-11
Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy.
Map ID: 6126Printed On: 06/08/2018
City of Auburn 2020 - 2025 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
0 1,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 5,500
FEETCity of Auburn
Parks
Water Features
Appendix B
2 N D ST SEDSTSWASTSWB ST NEB ST NW5TH S T N E
2ND ST NE
1S T ST NW
1ST ST SW 1ST ST SW
2ND ST SW N DIVISION ST3 R D ST NW
2ND ST NW
1ST ST NE
4TH ST NE
3RD S T NE
2ND ST NE
2ND ST SE
1ST ST NE
BSTNE1ST ST SW
1ST ST NW
1ST ST SE
SDIVISIONST3RD ST NE
4
THSTS W1ST ST NE
2ND ST NE
D ST SEPA R K AV E N E
ASTNETRANSITRDSW D ST NEASTSWD ST NWASTNEE ST SER-4
R-16
R-5
4T H ST S E
E M A I N S TASTNW
ASTSEAuburnAve3RD ST NE
W MAIN ST ASTNWCROSS ST SECS
TSWAUBURN WAY S3RD ST SWCSTSW AUBURN WAY NC ST NWP-11 P-9
S-1
N-6
Intersection and ITS Improvements
Non-Motorized/Transit Improvements
Prelim Eng and Misc Improvements
Preservation
Roadway Improvements
P-8
I-1
R-20
R-27
R-26
I-1
R-10
Page 209 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5433 (Gaub)
Date:
June 10, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5433
Local Agency Agreement Form (Exhibit A)
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5433.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5433 authorizes the Mayor to accept and expend federal grant funds to be
administered through a Local Agency Agreement with the Washington State Department of
Transportation in the amount of $1,297,500 to finance the design phase of the Auburn Way S
Improvements Hemlock Street SE to Poplar Street SE. This grant requires $202,500 as local
funding match.
Puget Sound Regional Council is in the process of approving a supplemental funding action
for 2019. If approved, the grant funds for this project will be awarded to the City and must be
obligated by July 15, 2019 therefore this action is necessary now to allow staff to complete
the process to meet the obligation deadline.
This project will widen the roadway between Hemlock Street SE and Poplar Street SE to
create a five-lane cross section with two general purpose travel lanes in each direction, and a
two-way center left-turn lane. A new traffic signal with intelligent transportation system
connectivity is proposed at, or near, the Noble Court intersection to support access to
Chinook Elementary School. Additionally, curb and gutter, 10 foot sidewalks, illumination,
transit stop improvements, storm water improvements, and access management (where
feasible) with accommodation for U-turns are proposed. This project is an extension of the
recently completed improvements currently terminating at the Hemlock Street Intersection.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.C
Page 210 of 245
Page 211 of 245
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 5433
June 17, 2019
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 5433
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
ACCEPT AND EXPEND FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS AND
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE AUBURN
WAY SOUTH IMPROVEMENTS – HEMLOCK STREET SE TO
POPLAR STREET SE
WHEREAS, the City desires to improve safety, capacity, and efficiency of the City’s
street network throughout Auburn; and
WHEREAS, the need for the Auburn Way South Improvements – Hemlock Street
SE to Poplar Street SE Project is recognized in Auburn’s adopted Transportation
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, the City applied for and was awarded the following federal grant to be
administered by the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) with
required local funding match percentage as indicated:
• $1,297,500 to finance the design phase of the Auburn Way S Improvements –
Hemlock Street SE and Poplar Street SE (“the Project”); and
WHEREAS, funding has been made available in the approved City budget to
provide the local funding match requirements for the grant; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to use grant monies to finance
capital improvements to the City’s transportation system.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is authorized to accept the federal grant for $1,297,500 for
the Auburn Way S Improvements – Hemlock Street SE to Poplar Street SE. The Mayor
Page 212 of 245
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 5433
June 17, 2019
Page 2
is further authorized to negotiate, finalize, and execute an Agreement between the City
and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), in conformity with the
WSDOT grant and in substantial conformity with the grant agreement template attached,
marked as Exhibit A. The Mayor is also authorized to negotiate, finalize, and execute any
further supplemental agreements consistent with project and grant requirements as may
be necessary for the future phases of the Project.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement such other administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage
and signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 213 of 245
Washington StateWAiDepartmentofTransportation Local Agency Agreement9Y9
Agency CFDA No.20.205
Catalog or Federal Domestic Assistance)
Address
Project No.
Agreement No.
For OSC WSDOT Use Only
The Local Agency having complied, or hereby agreeing to comply,with the terms and conditions set forth in(1)Title 23, U.S. Code
Highways, (2)the regulations issued pursuant thereto, (3)2 CFR Part 200, (4)2 CFR Part 180—certifying that the local agency is not
excluded from receiving Federal funds by a Federal suspension or debarment, (5)the policies and procedures promulgated by the
Washington State Department of Transportation, and(6)the federal aid project agreement entered into between the State and Federal
Government, relative to the above project,the Washington State Department of Transportation will authorize the Local Agency to
proceed on the project by a separate notification. Federal funds which are to be obligated for the project may not exceed the amount
shown herein on line r, column 3,without written authority by the State, subject to the approval of the Federal Highway Administration.
All project costs not reimbursed by the Federal Government shall be the responsibility of the Local Agency.
Project Description
Name Length
Termini
Description of Work
Project Agreement End Date Claiming Indirect Cost Rate
Proposed Advertisement Date
Yes I No
Estimate of Funding
1) 2) 3)
Type of Work Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated Federal
Project Funds Funds Funds
PE a.Agency
b.Other
Federal Aid c.Other
Participation
d.State
Ratio for PE 0.00 0.00 0.00e.Total PE Cost Estimate(a+b+c+d)
Right of Way f.Agency
k
g.Other
Federal Aid
h.OtherParticipation
Ratio for RW i.State
j.Total RNV Cost Estimate(f+a+h+i) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Construction k.Contract
ok
I.Other
m.Other
Federal Aid n.Other
Participation
o.AgencyRatioforCN
p.State
a.Total CN Cost Estimate(k+l+m+n+o+o)0.00 0.00 0.00
r.Total Project Cost Estimate(e+j+a) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
By By
Title Director, Local Programs
Date Executed
DOT Form 140-039 Page 1
Revised 03/2019
Page 214 of 245
Construction Method of Financing (Check Method Selected)
State Ad and Award
Method A-Advance Payment-Agency Share of total construction cost(based on contract award)
Method B-Withhold from gas tax the Agency's share of total construction coast(line 5, column 2) in the amount of
at$per month for months.
Local Force or Local Ad and Award
Method C-Agency cost incurred with partial reimbursement
The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and
as a condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions
set forth below.Adopted by official action on
Resolution/Ordinance No.
Provisions
I.Scope of Work
The Agency shall provide all the work, labor, materials, and services necessary to perform the project which is described and set
forth in detail in the"Project Description" and"Type of Work."
When the State acts for and on behalf of the Agency,the State shall be deemed an agent of the Agency and shall perform the
services described and indicated in"Type of Work"on the face of this agreement, in accordance with plans and specifications as
proposed by the Agency and approved by the State and the Federal Highway Administration.
When the State acts for the Agency but is not subject to the right of control by the Agency,the State shall have the right to perform
the work subject to the ordinary procedures of the State and Federal Highway Administration.
II.Delegation of Authority
The State is willing to fulfill the responsibilities to the Federal Government by the administration of this project.The Agency agrees
that the State shall have the full authority to carry out this administration.The State shall review, process, and approve documents
required for federal aid reimbursement in accordance with federal requirements. If the State advertises and awards the contract,the
State will further act for the Agency in all matters concerning the project as requested by the Agency. If the Local Agency advertises and
awards the project,the State shall review the work to ensure conformity with the approved plans and specifications.
III. Project Administration
Certain types of work and services shall be provided by the State on this project as requested by the Agency and described in the
Type of Work above. In addition,the State will furnish qualified personnel for the supervision and inspection of the work in progress. On
Local Agency advertised and awarded projects, the supervision and inspection shall be limited to ensuring all work is in conformance
with approved plans, specifications, and federal aid requirements.The salary of such engineer or other supervisor and all other salaries
and costs incurred by State forces upon the project will be considered a cost thereof.All costs related to this project incurred by
employees of the State in the customary manner on highway payrolls and vouchers shall be charged as costs of the project.
IV.Availability of Records
All project records in support of all costs incurred and actual expenditures kept by the Agency are to be maintained in accordance
with local government accounting procedures prescribed by the Washington State Auditor's Office,the U.S. Department of
Transportation, and the Washington State Department of Transportation.The records shall be open to inspection by the State and
Federal Government at all reasonable times and shall be retained and made available for such inspection for a period of not less than
three years from the final payment of any federal aid funds to the Agency. Copies of said records shall be furnished to the State and/or
Federal Government upon request.
V.Compliance with Provisions
The Agency shall not incur any federal aid participation costs on any classification of work on this project until authorized in writing
by the State for each classification.The classifications of work for projects are:
1. Preliminary engineering.
2. Right of way acquisition.
3. Project construction.
Once written authorization is given,the Agency agrees to show continuous progress through monthly billings. Failure to show
continuous progress may result the Agency's project becoming inactive, as described in 23 CFR 630, and subject to de-obligation of
federal aid funds and/or agreement closure.
If right of way acquisition, or actual construction of the road for which preliminary engineering is undertaken is not started by the
close of the tenth fiscal year following the fiscal year in which preliminary engineering phase was authorized,the Agency will repay to
the State the sum or sums of federal funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement(see Section IX).
If actual construction of the road for which right of way has been purchased is not started by the close of the tenth fiscal year
following the fiscal year in which the right of way phase was authorized,the Agency will repay to the State the sum or sums of federal
funds paid to the Agency under the terms of this agreement(see Section IX).
DOT Form 140-039 Page 2
Revised 03/2019
Page 215 of 245
The Agency agrees that all stages of construction necessary to provide the initially planned complete facility within the limits of this
project will conform to at least the minimum values set by approved statewide design standards applicable to this class of highways,
even though such additional work is financed without federal aid participation.
The Agency agrees that on federal aid highway construction projects,the current federal aid regulations which apply to liquidated
damages relative to the basis of federal participation in the project cost shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete
the contract within the contract time.
VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement
The total cost of the project, including all review and engineering costs and other expenses of the State, is to be paid by the Agency
and by the Federal Government. Federal funding shall be in accordance with the Federal Transportation Act, as amended,2 CFR Part
200.The State shall not be ultimately responsible for any of the costs of the project.The Agency shall be ultimately responsible for all
costs associated with the project which are not reimbursed by the Federal Government. Nothing in this agreement shall be construed as
a promise by the State as to the amount or nature of federal participation in this project.
The Agency shall bill the state for federal aid project costs incurred in conformity with applicable federal and state laws.The agency
shall minimize the time elapsed between receipt of federal aid funds and subsequent payment of incurred costs. Expenditures by the
Local Agency for maintenance,general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be eligible for federal participation
unless a current indirect cost plan has been prepared in accordance with the regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200-Uniform Admin
Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, and retained for audit.
The State will pay for State incurred costs on the project. Following payment,the State shall bill the Federal Government for
reimbursement of those costs eligible for federal participation to the extent that such costs are attributable and properly allocable to
this project.The State shall bill the Agency for that portion of State costs which were not reimbursed by the Federal Government(see
Section IX).
1. Project Construction Costs
Project construction financing will be accomplished by one of the three methods as indicated in this agreement.
Method A—The Agency will place with the State,within(20)days after the execution of the construction contract, an advance in the
amount of the Agency's share of the total construction cost based on the contract award.The State will notify the Agency of the exact
amount to be deposited with the State.The State will pay all costs incurred under the contract upon presentation of progress billings
from the contractor. Following such payments,the State will submit a billing to the Federal Government for the federal aid participation
share of the cost.When the project is substantially completed and final actual costs of the project can be determined,the State will
present the Agency with a final billing showing the amount due the State or the amount due the Agency.This billing will be cleared by
either a payment from the Agency to the State or by a refund from the State to the Agency.
Method B—The Agency's share of the total construction cost as shown on the face of this agreement shall be withheld from its
monthly fuel tax allotments.The face of this agreement establishes the months in which the withholding shall take place and the exact
amount to be withheld each month.The extent of withholding will be confirmed by letter from the State at the time of contract award.
Upon receipt of progress billings from the contractor,the State will submit such billings to the Federal Government for payment of its
participating portion of such billings.
Method C—The Agency may submit vouchers to the State in the format prescribed by the State, in duplicate, not more than once
per month for those costs eligible for Federal participation to the extent that such costs are directly attributable and properly allocable
to this project. Expenditures by the Local Agency for maintenance,general administration, supervision, and other overhead shall not be
eligible for Federal participation unless claimed under a previously approved indirect cost plan.
The State shall reimburse the Agency for the Federal share of eligible project costs up to the amount shown on the face of this
agreement.At the time of audit,the Agency will provide documentation of all costs incurred on the project.The State shall bill the
Agency for all costs incurred by the State relative to the project.The State shall also bill the Agency for the federal funds paid by the
State to the Agency for project costs which are subsequently determined to be ineligible for federal participation (see Section IX).
VII.Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts
The Agency, if services of a consultant are required, shall be responsible for audit of the consultant's records to determine eligible
federal aid costs on the project.The report of said audit shall be in the Agency's files and made available to the State and the Federal
Government.
An audit shall be conducted by the WSDOT Internal Audit Office in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing
standards as issued by the United States General Accounting Office by the Comptroller General of the United States;WSDOT Manual
M 27-50, Consultant Authorization, Selection, and Agreement Administration; memoranda of understanding between WSDOT and
FHWA; and 2 CFR Part 200.501 -Audit Requirements.
If upon audit it is found that overpayment or participation of federal money in ineligible items of cost has occurred,the Agency shall
reimburse the State for the amount of such overpayment or excess participation(see Section IX).
VIII.Single Audit Act
The Agency, as a subrecipient of federal funds,shall adhere to the federal regulations outlined in 2 CFR Part 200.501 as well as all
applicable federal and state statutes and regulations.A subrecipient who expends$750,000 or more in federal awards from all sources
during a given fiscal year shall have a single or program-specific audit performed for that year in accordance with the provisions of 2
CFR Part 200.501. Upon conclusion of the audit,the Agency shall be responsible for ensuring that a copy of the report is transmitted
promptly to the State.
DOT Form 140-039 Page 3
Revised 0312019 Page 216 of 245
IX.Payment of Billing
The Agency agrees that if payment or arrangement for payment of any of the State's billing relative to the project(e.g., State force
work, project cancellation, overpayment, cost ineligible for federal participation,etc.)is not made to the State within 45 days after
the Agency has been billed, the State shall effect reimbursement of the total sum due from the regular monthly fuel tax allotments to
the Agency from the Motor Vehicle Fund. No additional Federal project funding will be approved until full payment is received unless
otherwise directed by the Director, Local Programs.
Project Agreement End Date-This date is based on your projects Period of Performance(2 CFR Part 200.309).
Any costs incurred after the Project Agreement End Date are NOT eligible for federal reimbursement.All eligible costs incurred prior
to the Project Agreement End Date must be submitted for reimbursement within 60 days after the Project Agreement End Date or they
become ineligible for federal reimbursement.
X.Traffic Control,Signing,Marking,and Roadway Maintenance
The Agency will not permit any changes to be made in the provisions for parking regulations and traffic control on this project
without prior approval of the State and Federal Highway Administration.The Agency will not install or permit to be installed any signs,
signals, or markings not in conformance with the standards approved by the Federal Highway Administration and MUTCD.The Agency
will, at its own expense, maintain the improvement covered by this agreement.
XI.Indemnity
The Agency shall hold the Federal Government and the State harmless from and shall process and defend at its own expense
all claims, demands, or suits,whether at law or equity brought against the Agency, State, or Federal Government, arising from the
Agency's execution, performance, or failure to perform any of the provisions of this agreement, or of any other agreement or contract
connected with this agreement, or arising by reason of the participation of the State or Federal Government in the project, PROVIDED,
nothing herein shall require the Agency to reimburse the State or the Federal Government for damages arising out of bodily injury to
persons or damage to property caused by or resulting from the sole negligence of the Federal Government or the State.
XII.Nondiscrimination Provision
No liability shall attach to the State or Federal Government except as expressly provided herein.
The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of race,color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any USDOT-
assisted contract and/or agreement or in the administration of its DBE program or the requirements of 49 CFR Part 26.The Agency
shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of
USDOT-assisted contracts and agreements.The WSDOT's DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26 and as approved by USDOT,
is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of this program is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms
shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the Agency of its failure to carry out its approved program,the
Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under
18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986(31 U.S. C. 3801 et seq.).
The Agency hereby agrees that it will incorporate or cause to be incorporated into any contract for construction work, or modification
thereof, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Secretary of Labor in 41 CFR Chapter 60,which is paid for in whole or in part with
funds obtained from the Federal Government or borrowed on the credit of the Federal Government pursuant to a grant, contract, loan,
insurance, or guarantee or understanding pursuant to any federal program involving such grant, contract, loan, insurance, or guarantee,
the required contract provisions for Federal-Aid Contracts(FHWA 1273), located in Chapter 44 of the Local Agency Guidelines.
The Agency further agrees that it will be bound by the above equal opportunity clause with respect to its own employment
practices when it participates in federally assisted construction work: Provided,that if the applicant so participating is a State or Local
Government, the above equal opportunity clause is not applicable to any agency, instrumentality, or subdivision of such government
which does not participate in work on or under the contract.
The Agency also agrees:
1)To assist and cooperate actively with the State in obtaining the compliance of contractors and subcontractors with the equal
opportunity clause and rules, regulations, and relevant orders of the Secretary of Labor.
2)To furnish the State such information as it may require for the supervision of such compliance and that it will otherwise assist the
State in the discharge of its primary responsibility for securing compliance.
3)To refrain from entering into any contract or contract modification subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965,with
a contractor debarred from,or who has not demonstrated eligibility for, government contracts and federally assisted construction
contracts pursuant to the Executive Order.
4)To carry out such sanctions and penalties for violation of the equal opportunity clause as may be imposed upon contractors
and subcontractors by the State, Federal Highway Administration, or the Secretary of Labor pursuant to Part II, subpart D of the
Executive Order.
In addition, the Agency agrees that if it fails or refuses to comply with these undertakings,the State may take any or all of the
following actions:
a)Cancel,terminate, or suspend this agreement in whole or in part;
b)Refrain from extending any further assistance to the Agency under the program with respect to which the failure or refusal
occurred until satisfactory assurance of future compliance has been received from the Agency; and
c)Refer the case to the Department of Justice for appropriate legal proceedings.
DOT Form 140-039 Page 4
Revised 03/2019 Page 217 of 245
XIII. Liquidated Damages
The Agency hereby agrees that the liquidated damages provisions of 23 CFR Part 635, Subpart 127, as supplemented, relative to
the amount of Federal participation in the project cost, shall be applicable in the event the contractor fails to complete the contract within
the contract time. Failure to include liquidated damages provision will not relieve the Agency from reduction of federal participation in
accordance with this paragraph.
XIV.Termination for Public Convenience
The Secretary of the Washington State Department of Transportation may terminate the contract in whole, or from time to time in
part,whenever:
1)The requisite federal funding becomes unavailable through failure of appropriation or otherwise.
2)The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work as a direct result of an Executive Order of the President with
respect to the prosecution of war or in the interest of national defense, or an Executive Order of the President or Governor of
the State with respect to the preservation of energy resources.
3)The contractor is prevented from proceeding with the work by reason of a preliminary, special, or permanent restraining
order of a court of competent jurisdiction where the issuance of such order is primarily caused by the acts or omissions of
persons or agencies other than the contractor.
4)The Secretary is notified by the Federal Highway Administration that the project is inactive.
5)The Secretary determines that such termination is in the best interests of the State.
XV.Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action
For the convenience of the parties to this contract, it is agreed that any claims and/or causes of action which the Local Agency
has against the State of Washington,growing out of this contract or the project with which it is concerned, shall be brought only in the
Superior Court for Thurston County.
XVI.Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use of Federal Funds for Lobbying
The approving authority certifies,to the best of his or her knowledge and belief,that:
1)No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or
an employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract,the making of any federal grant,the
making of any federal loan,the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment,
or modification of any federal contract,grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
2)If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to
influence an officer or employee of any federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee
of a member of Congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement,the undersigned shall
complete and submit the Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
3)The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at
all tiers(including subgrants, and contracts and subcontracts under grants, subgrants, loans, and cooperative agreements)which
exceed$100,000, and that all such subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into.
Submission of this certification as a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Section 1352,Title 31, U.S.
Code.Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than$10,000 and not more than
100,000 for each such failure.
XVII.Assurances
Local agencies receiving Federal funding from the USDOT or its operating administrations(i.e., Federal Highway Administration,
Federal Transit Administration, Federal Aviation Administration)are required to submit a written policy statement, signed by the Agency
Executive and addressed to the State,documenting that all programs, activities, and services will be conducted in compliance with
Section 504 and the Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA).
Additional Provisions
DOT Form 140-039 Page 5
Revised 03/2019 Page 218 of 245
666.7
NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet
Feet666.7333.30
1:4,000
Auburn Way S (SR-164) - Hemlock to Poplar
1in =333 ft
6/5/2019Printed Date:
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
Imagery Date: May 2015
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy. Page 219 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5435 (Coleman)
Date:
June 11, 2019
Department:
Finance
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5435
Budget Impact:
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Approve Resolution No. 5435
Background Summary:
The King County Solid Waste Division released the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan (2019 Plan) for City approval on May 20, 2019. The 2019 Plan outlines
programs to prevent, recycle, and dispose of waste in King County. The King County Council
approved the 2019 Plan on April 24, 2019. Now, cities representing at least 75 percent of the
incorporated population need to approve the 2019 Plan.
The 2019 Plan in electronic format can be viewed at:
https://your.kingcounty.gov/dnrp/library/solid-waste/about/planning/2019-comp-
plan.pdf
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Coleman
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.D
Page 220 of 245
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 5435
June 3, 2019
Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2018
RESOLUTION NO. 5435
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, APPROVING THE 2019
COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
FOR THE KING COUNTY SOLID WASTE SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the purpose of the 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan (2019 Plan) is to plan for solid waste and materials reduction, collection, and
handling and management services and programs for the geographic area where King
County has authority, by law or by agreement, to plan for solid waste management, and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan was prepared according to RCW 70.95.080, which
requires that each county, in cooperation with the cities located within the county, prepare
and periodically update a coordinated, comprehensive solid waste management plan, and
WHEREAS, under the 2013 Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement ("the
interlocal agreement"), which was executed by all cities except Seattle and Milton, King
County serves as the planning authority for solid waste, and
WHEREAS, King County worked with the city representatives on the Metropolitan
Solid Waste Management Advisory Committee to develop the 2019 Plan, and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan replaces the 2001 Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan, which was approved by Auburn on February 4, 2002, and
WHEREAS, on April 17, 2019 the King County Regional Policy Committee, acting
as the Metropolitan King County Council Solid Waste Interlocal Forum, recommended
adoption of the 2019 Plan; and
WHEREAS, on April 24, 2019 the Metropolitan King County Council approved the
2019 Plan, and
Page 221 of 245
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 5435
June 3, 2019
Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2018
WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan cannot receive final approval until cities representing
at least 75 percent of the incorporated population approve the plan and that must occur
within 120-days from receipt of the King County-approved Plan by a city, and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Plan is further subject to final approval by the Washington
State Department of Ecology;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The 2019 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan,
Attachment A to this resolution, is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative
procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage and
signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 222 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5436 (Gaub)
Date:
June 11, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5436
Local Agency Agreement Supplement Form
(Exhibit A)
Vicinity Map
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5436.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5436 authorizes the Mayor to accept additional federal funding beyond what
was originally awarded for CP1819 – A Street SE Preservation Project. Puget Sound
Regional Council is in the process of approving a supplemental funding action for 2019. If
approved, this project will receive additional grant funds that must be obligated by July 15,
2019 therefore this action is necessary now to allow staff to complete the process to meet
the obligation deadline and assist the region in meeting the federal targets for 2019. If these
federal targets are not met, the federal funding that is provided to the region in future years
could be reduced.
The proposed supplemental funding action includes $450,000.00 of federal funds that will be
re-allocated from City Project CP1904 – Auburn Way North Preservation Phase 3 Project
which is budgeted in 2020 and allocate $310,610.00 of new federal funds to the project.
Since the CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project is fully funded, $760,610.00 of
previously allocated arterial preservation funds for the project will be transferred out of the
project, creating a net zero project budget change, as follows:
$450,000.00 will be transferred to CP1904 Auburn Way North Preservation Phase 3 to
replace the federal funds transferred to CP1819 – A Street SE Preservation; and
$310,610.00 will be transferred back to the arterial preservation fund balance
The CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project will grind and overlay A Street SE from East
Main Street to 17th Street SE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade curb ramps and
pedestrian signals (as necessary) to meet ADA requirements.
Construction has been awarded and is expected to begin in July 2019 and be complete in
Page 223 of 245
October 2019.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.E
Page 224 of 245
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 5436
June 7, 2019
Page 1
RESOLUTION NO. 5436
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
ACCEPT ADDITIONAL FEDERAL GRANT FUNDS TO BE
ADMINISTERED THROUGH THE WASHINGTON STATE
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR CP1819 A
STREET SE PRESERVATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 5369, adopted by City Council on May 21, 2018,
accepted federal grant funds for CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project; and
WHEREAS, through emergency supplemental funding, the City was awarded
additional federal grant funding from the Puget Sound Regional Council (“PSRC”) in the
amount of $310,610.00 to finance the construction phase of CP1819 A Street SE
Preservation project; and
WHEREAS, the additional federal funding received by PSRC will be administered
by the Washington State Department of Transportation (“WSDOT”) and requires a 13.5%
local funding match; and
WHEREAS, the City has budgeted to meet the local funding match requirements;
and
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the additional federal grant funding received as part
of the emergency supplement, $450,000.00 of federal funding previously allocated to
CP1904 Auburn Way North Preservation Phase 3 , will be transferred to CP1819 A Street
SE Preservation project; and
WHEREAS, since the CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project is fully funded, a
total of $760,610.00 in previously allocated arterial preservation funds for the project will
be transferred out of the project as follows:
Page 225 of 245
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 5436
June 7, 2019
Page 2
$450,000.00 will be transferred to CP1904 Auburn Way North Preservation
Phase 3; and
$310,610.00 will be transferred back to the local arterial preservation fund
balance; and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to use the emergency supplemental
grant funding to finance the CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. The Mayor is authorized to accept the additional federal grant funding
of $310,610.00 for the CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project. The Mayor is further
authorized to negotiate, finalize, and execute an amendment to the Local Agency
Agreement between the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation
(“WSDOT”), in conformity with the WSDOT grant and in substantial conformity with the
grant agreement supplement template attached as Exhibit A. The Mayor is also
authorized to negotiate, finalize, and execute any further agreements consistent with
project and grant requirements as may be necessary for any and all future phases of
CP1819 A Street SE Preservation project , expending up to the total amount of the
supplemental grant.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to implement such other administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation .
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect and be in full force on passage and
signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of ______________, 2019.
Page 226 of 245
-----------------------------
Resolution No. 5436
June 7, 2019
Page 3
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 227 of 245
Aft.
171
Washington State Supplement - Local Programs
1I/ Department of Transportation State Funding Agreement
Agency Supplement Number
Project Number Agreement Number
This supplemental agreement is made and entered into
All provisions in the AGREEMENT identified above remain in effect except as expressly modified by this supplement.
The changes to the agreement are described as follows:
Project Description No Change
Name
Location
Description of Work No Change
Reason for Supplement
Estimate of Funding
Type of Work 1) 2)
3) 4) 5)
Previous Supplement Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated
Agreement/Suppl. Project Funds Funds State Funds
PE a.Agency
b. Other
c. Other
d. State
e.Total PE Cost Estimate(a+b+c+d) $0.00 S 0.00 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00
RW f.Agency
g.Other
h.Other
i.State
j.Total RIW Cost Estimate(f+g+h+i) S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00
CN k.Contract
I.Other
m.Other
n.Other
o.Agency
p.State
q.Total CN Cost Estimate(k+l+m+n+o+p)S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00 S 0.00
r.Total Project Cost Estimate(e+j+q) S 0.00 S 0.00 0.00 0.00 S 0.00
AGENCY STATE
BY: BY:
Director,Local Programs
Title:
Date: Date:
DOT Form 140-087A
Revised 03/2016
Page 228 of 245
A Street SE Preservation Project - Phase 3 (East Main St to 17th St SE)
Printed Date:
Information shown is for general reference
purposes only and does not necessarily
represent exact geographic or cartographic
data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no
warranty as to its accuracy.
Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS
5/4/2016
Page 229 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5437 (Hinman)
Date:
June 10, 2019
Department:
Administration
Attachments:
RES 5437 - Auburn School Dis trict Reciprocal
Facility Agreement
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
Approve Resolution No. 5437
Background Summary:
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.F
Page 230 of 245
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5437
June 17, 2019
Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 5437
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF AUBURN AND THE AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
FOR MUTUAL AID DURING EMERGENCIES.
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that during an emergency it is important for each of
them to have an alternate location from which to conduct emergency operations if either
Party’s facilities become inoperable; and
WHEREAS, the Parties are willing to provide each other with assistance during an
emergency by making their facilities available; and
WHEREAS, the cities are authorized by RCW 39.34 and RCW 38.52.091to enter
into this agreement; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest for the City of Auburn to enter into an
agreement for the provision of alternate facilities for responding to a city emergency.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN,
WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows:
Section 1. That the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an Agreement
between the City and the Auburn School District for reciprocal use of each entities
facilities, which agreement shall be in substantial conformity with the agreement attached
as Exhibit A.
Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative
procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation, including
but not limited to amending the specific facility requirements in Exhibit A.
Page 231 of 245
----------------------------
Resolution No. 5437
June 17, 2019
Page 2 of 2
Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon
passage and signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
_________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
_________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 232 of 245
Reciprocal Emergency Facility Use Agreement
Exhibit A
EOC Space requirements
The City has a need for two critical functions during a disaster or other large scale event that
prevents the City from using it’s normal work areas. These are generally considered office type
environments for essential personnel to coordinate the city’s emergency response and recovery
efforts and to perform essential functions to help operate and lead City departments. While
many of the options in this exhibit use school facilities as examples, any room or area of similar
size could be considered. It is preferred to have the EOC and COOP operations in the same
building or campus, however the Safe Assembly area should not be at the same location.
Emergency Operation Center- Use of a room or rooms to be used by the city as an
alternate location for operation of the City’s EOC. The space needed for the EOC operations
is approximately 1,200 square feet. A normal school classroom or the administration
conference room or computer lab would be an example of a sufficient work area.
• Additional Support: - This should include the use of the facility’s electrical
power, internet, WIFI if available, access to restrooms, and water. Electrical
support would come from the facility’s normal outlets, typical electrical service
for a classroom or office area would suffice. A small parking area for up to 30
EOC personnel is also needed.
Continuity of Operations Plan (COOP)- Essential personnel from each city department
would require space to plan, coordinate, and lead each department’s operations from an
alternate location. It is expected that each department would need tables and chairs from
which to perform office work on laptop computers using cell phone and paperwork brought
by City staff. The space needed for the city’s COOP efforts would be more significant due to
the number of staff members involved. This space would be approximately 2,500 square feet.
Ideally this could be accommodated with 2-3 normal school classrooms, or other rooms of
similar size. One large room such as the Board Room in the administration building would
also work.
• Additional Support – This should include the use of the facility’s electrical power,
internet, WIFI if available, access to restrooms, and water. Electrical support
would come from the facility’s normal outlets, typical electrical service for a
classroom or office area would suffice. A parking area for up to 80 COOP
personnel is also needed.
Safe Assembly Location Use of a parking area, restrooms and water as a safe assembly
location for temporary use until evacuees can be directed to an emergency shelter. The intent
is for a location that evacuees can gather in a safe location until directed to relocate to a
Page 233 of 245
longer term shelter in another location. It is anticipated that vehicles will temporarily fill any
available paved and marked parking areas. Depending on scale of evacuation and number of
vehicles it’s possible that overflow parking may also be needed on unpaved parking areas of
the facility. Safe assembly locations are intended to be a short term usage, until Emergency
Shelters are activated, at that time those residents at the safe assembly locations will be
directed to move to the shelter. The city will have staff members on location to coordinate
traffic and communicate with evacuees as soon as possible. Auburn Mountainview High
School is designated as a potential Safe Assembly location.
Emergency Shelter Auburn School District facilities may be used as emergency shelter as
agreed to with the American Red Cross.
Transportation The use of Auburn School District buses, if available, would include
utilizing the agency’s bus drivers. Buses and drivers will remain under the control of their
agency. For most evacuations it is expected that the large 49 passenger buses would be
preferable due to their ability to move the most evacuees.
Page 234 of 245
Page 1 of 6
Reciprocal Emergency Facility Use Agreement
Between the City of Auburn and the Auburn School District
1. The Parties to this Agreement are the City of Auburn (“City”) and the Auburn School
District (“District”), both of which is an entity authorized to enter into this agreement
pursuant to Chapter 39.34 (Interlocal Cooperation Act) of the Revised Code of Washington.
2. Statement of need or goals. All parties recognize the importance for each of them to have
the use of functional facilities during major emergencies or events. Each party has a
dedicated facilities, and trained staff to coordinate its efforts as described in each party’s
Comprehensive Emergency Plan. All parties also recognize that an event or emergency may
render that party’s facilities inoperable and the parties may need to perform emergency-
related duties from an alternate location. The purpose of this Agreement is to allow one party
to use the facilities of another party, if available for use.
3. What is included in the Agreement. Use of the responding party’s facilities,
communications equipment, audio visual equipment, and other equipment that is generally
used for operations. The facilities may include office space, large space that can be used as a
shelter, and parking lots that may be used as a safe assembly location.
4. Radios/phones/computers/room size needed. For each potential need, the parties have
identified on Exhibit A their estimated space needs, as well as additional support included
but not limited to electricity, water, internet, cable, restroom(s), telephone(s), computer(s),
and radio(s).
5. When Agreement will be used. The Agreement may be used when a requesting party’s
facilities are determined to be unusable.
6. How to activate. Upon determination of need by the requesting party’s emergency manager
or designee, the requesting party will contact the responding party’s emergency manager, or
designee, to request use of the responding parties facilities. The request should estimate the
level of activation and the estimated time the facility will be needed.
7. Support by responding party. The responding party will provide a liaison, when possible,
to assist with operation of equipment, supplies, and other infrastructure needed to operate the
facilities. Once the requesting party has occupied the facility, the parties will determine if the
liaison is required full time, or simply available as needed.
8. Requesting party responsibilities. The requesting party will maintain all equipment in an
operational condition and will not make any changes to computers, radios, hardware or
software without the consent of the responding party. The requesting party is responsible for
the cleanup of any debris and returning the facility to its normal condition.
Page 235 of 245
Page 2 of 6
9. Recovery of any costs incurred. The requesting party will be responsible for any damages,
repairs, and personnel costs incurred by the responding party as a result of the requesting
party’s use.
10. Timing. The responding party will make the facilities available within one hour of approving
a request if feasible.
11. Practice/Exercise. In order to effectively activate this Agreement and use another party’s
facilities, the parties recognize that training or exercises will be beneficial to all parties. The
parties agree to responding one training session or exercise lasting up to 3 hours in their
facilities each year. The timing and duration of the training session or exercise will be
mutually agreed upon by the parties.
12. Contact information. Each party will provide contact information for three individuals
authorized to allow a responding party to use its facility on short notice. Contact information
will include name, title, email address, work phone and mobile phone number for each
individual and should be updated or confirmed when a listed individual leaves their position
or on an annual basis.
13. Reciprocal nature. The intent of this Agreement is to be reciprocal in nature. Each party
acknowledges that it may either act as the responding party or the requesting party at any
time and that the benefits are roughly equal in nature. No party is required to allow another
party to use its facilities.
14. Cancellation of agreement. A party can withdraw from this agreement by providing 30
day’s written notice to the other parties. If one party withdraws from the agreement, it will
not affect the other parties’ agreement.
15. Insurance. The requesting party will be responsible for maintaining, during the term of this
Agreement and at its sole cost and expense, the types of insurance coverages, which include
a severability of interest provision, as appropriate for the size of the facility and the
responding party. Any party may self-insure or be a member of a risk pool.
16. Indemnification.
Indemnification and Defense: Each party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the other
cities, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers harmless from any and all claims,
injuries, damages, losses, or suits, including but not limited to reasonable attorney fees and
litigation costs (hereinafter’ claims’), allegedly caused solely by the negligence or willful
misconduct of such party, its agents, affiliated corporations, officers, officials, employees,
volunteers, or lower tier subcontractors, (hereinafter tortfeasors), arising out of or in
connection with the performance of this Agreement.
If the negligence or willful misconduct of more than one party or its tortfeasors is a cause of
such claims then the liability will be shared between those cities in proportion to the relative
degree of negligence or willful misconduct between such cities and such proportion will
apply to the rights of indemnity and defense.
If a court of competent jurisdiction determines that this Agreement is subject to
Page 236 of 245
Page 3 of 6
RCW 4.24.115, then, in the event of liability for damages arising out of bodily injury to
persons or damages to property caused by or resulting from concurrent negligence of the
Cities and their tortfeasors, then each party’s liability will be only to the extent of its
negligence.
Solely for the purposes of this indemnification, it is further specifically and expressly
understood that the indemnification provided for in this Agreement constitutes the parties’
waiver of immunity under Industrial Insurance, Title 51 RCW, for claims brought by any
party or party’s employee against another party. Furthermore, in the event of a property loss
each party agrees to waive any rights of recovery against each other to the extent the property
loss at issue is covered by insurance.
These waivers have been mutually negotiated by the parties. The provisions of this section
will survive the expiration or termination of this agreement.
17. Dispute Resolution
a. Meet and Confer Process
In the event that any party believes another party has breached a term of this Agreement,
it may request in writing that the parties meet and confer in good faith for the purpose of
attempting to reach a mutually satisfactory resolution of the problem within fifteen (15)
days of the date of service of the written request.
b. Notice of Disagreement
A party unsatisfied with the meet and confer process may file a Notice of Disagreement
within fifteen (15) days of the meet and confer process by providing written notice to the
other party. A party not electing to utilize the meet and confer process may file a Notice
of Disagreement at any time by providing written notice to the other party. The Notice of
Disagreement will identify and describe any alleged breach of the Agreement with
particularity and will identify the action required to remedy the breach.
c. Response to Notice of Disagreement
i. Within fifteen (15) days of service of a Notice of Disagreement, the recipient
will provide a written response, either denying or admitting the allegations set
forth in the Notice of Disagreement and, if the truth of the allegations is
admitted, setting forth in detail the steps it has taken and/or will take to cure
the breach.
ii. Failure to serve a timely response will entitle the complaining party to proceed
immediately to arbitration, or other alternative dispute resolution mechanism
mutually agreeable to the parties.
d. Enforcement
Page 237 of 245
Page 4 of 6
Any award in arbitration or mediation held pursuant to Section 18(c) may be enforced by
bringing an action in the Superior Court for King County, Washington.
18. Severability. Each provision of this Agreement is intended to be severable, and if any
provision hereof is illegal or invalid for any reason whatsoever, such illegality or invalidity
will not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement.
19. Amendment, Assignment & Waiver.
a. No amendment, modification, or waiver of any condition, provision, or term of this
Agreement will be valid unless it is made in writing, signed by the parties to be
bound, and specifies, with particularity, the nature and extent of such amendment,
modification, or waiver.
b. No party to this Agreement will assign any right or obligation in this Agreement, in
whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other parties, and any such
assignment will not be deemed to release the assignor from any liability or obligation
under this Agreement, or to cause any such liability or obligation to be reduced to a
secondary liability or obligation.
20. Integration & Binding Effect.
a. This Agreement, together with any subsequent amendments or addendums,
constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and no other understandings, oral or
otherwise, regarding this Agreement will exist or bind any of the parties.
b. This Agreement will be binding upon, and the benefits and obligations provided for
herein will inure to and bind, the parties and their respective successors and assigns,
provided that this Section will not be deemed to permit any transfer or assignment
otherwise prohibited by this Agreement.
c. This Agreement is for the exclusive benefit of the parties and it does not create a
contractual relationship with, or exist for the benefit of, any third party, including
contractors, subcontractors, or their sureties.
21. Choice of Law.
a. This Agreement and the rights of the parties hereunder will be governed by the
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Washington and venue for any
action hereunder will be in of the county in King County, Washington.
b. Subject to the limitations set forth in RCW 4.84.330, each party agrees to bear its own
costs and attorneys’ fees generated by any dispute arising out of this Agreement.
22. Notices, Reports & Correspondence. All notices or communications permitted or required
to be given under this Agreement will be in writing and will be deemed to have been duly
given if delivered in person or deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, for
Page 238 of 245
Page 5 of 6
mailing by certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed, if to a party of this
Agreement, to the address for the party set forth above.
23. Signature Authority. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will
be one and the same Agreement and will become effective when one or more counterparts
have been signed by each of the parties and delivered to the other party.
24.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
effective the day and year first set forth above.
CITY OF AUBURN
Nancy Backus, Mayor
Attest:
Shawn Campbell, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Steve Gross, City Attorney
Page 239 of 245
6
AUBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent
Attest:
Approved as to form:
Curtis M. Leonard, District Counsel
Page 240 of 245
AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM
Agenda Subject:
Resolution No. 5439 (Gaub)
Date:
June 11, 2019
Department:
Public Works
Attachments:
Res olution No. 5439
Budget Impact:
Current Budget: $0
Proposed Revision: $0
Revised Budget: $0
Administrativ e Recommendation:
City Council adopt Resolution No. 5439.
Background Summary:
Resolution No. 5439 authorizes the City to submit an application for and, if awarded, to accept
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grant funds for the construction of Project CP1516,
Auburn Municipal Airport Runway 16-34 Extension.
The project will improve aircraft safety and the ability to accommodate the current and
forecast fleet of multi-engineer piston aircraft for both takeoff and accelerated-stop distances
by providing additional runway length. Grant funding from the FAA is available to support the
construction of this project. However, before the FAA is able to award these funds, a
resolution must be approved by the City including a specific statement of support.
The cost of the construction is estimated to total up to $3,000,000. Funding is anticipated to
be as follows:
Source Amount Percentage
Federal Funds (FAA) $2,700,000 90.0%
Local Funds (Airport Fund #465) $150,000 5.0%
State Funds (WSDOT) $150,000* 5.0%
Total $3,000,000 100.0%
* The City has also applied for a $150,000.00 grant from the Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT), Aviation Division. WSDOT will notify the City soon whether these
grant funds will be awarded. If WSDOT grant funding is not awarded, the City's share would
increase to $300,000, or 10% of the total project cost.
Rev iewed by Council Committees:
Councilmember:Staff:Gaub
Meeting Date:June 17, 2019 Item Number:RES.G
Page 241 of 245
Page 242 of 245
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 5439
June 11, 2019
Page 1 of 3 Rev. 2018
RESOLUTION NO. 5439
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO APPLY
FOR AND, IF AWARDED, TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND GRANT
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $2,700,000.00 FROM THE
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION RELATED TO THE
AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT RUNWAY ENHANCEMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the completion of the construction of the Auburn Municipal
Airport Runway Enhancement project (“ Project”) at the Auburn Municipal Airport
is a necessary part of responsible airport facility management and maintenance,
and ensures the continued usability and safety of the runway surfaces for aircraft
use; and
WHEREAS, the Project is an integral part of the most recent Airport Master
Plan, which was approved by the Federal Aviation Administration and the
Washington State Department of Transportation, Aviation Division; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has submitted to the Washington State
Department of Transportation, Aviation Division a request for state grant funds in
the amount of One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) or 5% of
the total cost of the Runway Enhancement Project to be used for the construction
phase of the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn also has plans to apply to the Federal
Aviation Administration for a matching grant of up to Two Million Seven Hundred
Page 243 of 245
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 5439
June 11, 2019
Page 2 of 3 Rev. 2018
Thousand Dollars ($2,700,000.00) or 90.0% of the total cost of the Runway
Enhancement Project to be used for the construction phase of the project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has available, and is willing to provide, up
to One Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) which is 5% of the
funds needed as the City’s local match for the Runway Enhancement Project.
Alternatively, the City of Auburn has available, and is willing to provide, up to
Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.00) which is 10% of the funds
needed as the City’s local match for the Runway Enhancement Project if the
requested Washington State Department of Transportation, Aviation Division
grant funds are not awarded; and
WHEREAS, the Federal Aviation Administration, requires a resolution from
the City of Auburn expressing support of this project prior to award of the federal
grant funding and authorizing a representative for the execution of any grant
agreement; and
WHEREAS, by virtue of this Resolution the City Council finds that the
Runway Enhancement Project will benefit the health, safety and welfare of the
residents of the City of Auburn by improving and supports the Runway
Enhancement Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows:
Page 244 of 245
--------------------------------
Resolution No. 5439
June 11, 2019
Page 3 of 3 Rev. 2018
Section 1. The Council expresses its support for construction of the
Runway Enhancement Project and authorizes the City’s expenditure of up to One
Hundred and Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) as its 5% match of the funds
needed to complete this construction. Alternatively, the Auburn City Council
authorizes the City’s expenditure of up to Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
($300,000.00) if the requested Washington State Department of Transportation
Aviation Division grant funds are not awarded.
Section 2. The Mayor is authorized to apply for the Federal Aviation
Administration grant, to accept this grant if awarded, and to enter into contracts
to expend the grant funds. The Mayor is authorized to implement administrative
procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation.
Section 3. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage
and signatures.
Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019.
CITY OF AUBURN
____________________________
NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR
ATTEST:
____________________________
Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________
Steven L. Gross, City Attorney
Page 245 of 245