Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-25-2019 STUDY SESSION AGENDACity Council Study Session Muni Serv ices S FA Nov ember 25, 2019 - 5:30 P M City Hall Council Chambers A GE NDA Watch the meeting L I V E ! Watch the meeting video Meeting videos are not available until 72 hours after the meeting has concluded. I .C A L L TO O R D E R A .Roll Call I I .A NNO UNC E ME NT S , R E P O RT S , A ND P R E S E NTAT I O NS I I I .A G E ND A I T E MS F O R C O UNC I L D I S C US S I O N A .K ing County Metro Presentation of Mobility P lan and Service Changes (Gaub)(15 Minutes) B .K ing County Metro Presentation of RapidRide I L ine P referred A lignment and P rogress (Gaub)(15 Minutes) C.Ordinance No. 6753 (Gross)(5 Minutes) Making penalties for drug crimes consistent with state law, and amending sections 9.22.010 and 9.22.020 of the A uburn City Code D.Ordinance No. 6745 (Tate)(10 Minutes) A mending sections 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 and 19.02.140 of the Auburn City Code relating to school impact fees E .Ordinance No. 6746 (Tate)(15 Minutes) A dopting 2019 A nnual Comprehensive Plan Map and Text A mendments, and adopting corresponding rezones related to certain map amendments F.Ordinance No. 6749 (Tate)(5 Minutes) Removing administrative fees from City Code, and amending section 5.20.030 of the A uburn City Code G.Ordinance No. 6731 (Gaub)(5 Minutes) Renewal of a franchise for Astound Broadband, L L C, with amendments H.A D A Transition P lan (Gaub)(10 Minutes) I .3rd Quarter 2019 F inancial Report (T homas)(15 Minutes) J .Ordinance No. 6751 (T homas)(15 Minutes) A uthorizing amendments to the City of Auburn 2019-2020 budget Page 1 of 275 K .Ordinance No. 6752 (T homas)(10 Minutes) A uthorizing amendment to the City of Auburn 2019-2020 budget L .Resolution No. 5463 (Hinman)(5 Minutes) A uthorizing the Mayor to execute amendments to certain A uburn Municipal Airport land leases relating to the implementation of the 2020 fair market value lease rate adjustment M.Resolution No. 5474 (Hinman)(5 Minutes) E ndorsing the Sound Cities Association 2020 S tate L egislative Agenda N.Resolution No. 5475 (Hinman)(10 Minutes) A dopting the 2020 S tate and Federal L egislative A gendas I V.MUNI C I PA L S E RV I C E S D I S C US S I O N I T E MS A .AV HS Board Update (T homas)(10 Minutes) AV HS Board Update B .2019 F ireworks Update (P ierson)(15 Minutes) C.Resolution No. 5473 (Faber)(10 Minutes) Naming of two P ublic P arks in the K ersey 3 Development of the City of Auburn V.O T HE R D I S C US S I O N I T E MS V I .NE W B US I NE S S V I I .MAT R I X A .Matrix V I I I .A D J O UR NME NT Agendas and minutes are available to the public at the City Clerk's Office, on the City website (http://www.auburnwa.gov), and via e-mail. Complete agenda packets are available for review at the City Clerk's Office. Page 2 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: King County Metro Presentation of Mobility Plan and Service Changes (Gaub)(15 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Public Works Attachments: Mobility Pres entation Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: King County Metro has evaluated the existing service routes in the Auburn Area, conducted public outreach, and coordinated with city staff to assess needed changes in transit service to meet the needs of the community, to serve the proposed RapidRide I Line, and meet Metro’s Service guidelines. Metro staff will present their proposed changes to transit service in Auburn. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Gaub Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 3 of 275 Renton-Kent-Auburn Area Mobility Plan Auburn City Council Meeting November 25, 2019 Page 4 of 275 Mobility Plan •Increase network efficiency and invest in equity priority areas •Develop a network of mobility services to meet riders’ varied needs •Create a single route from Renton to Kent to Auburn to be upgraded to the RapidRide I Line •Inform, involve, and empower historically underrepresented people and communities in project decision making Needs and Priorities Spring 2019 Service Change Ordinance Developed Fall 2019 –Spring 2020 Service Change Education Summer 2020 Outreach and Plan Development Summer –Fall 2019 Service Change Begins Sept 2020 Page 5 of 275 Community engagement Nexus Youth and Family Services, South King County Mobility Coalition, Auburn Senior Center, Orion Industries Stakeholder interviews Halloween Harvest Festival, Les Gove Park Trunk or Treat, Outlet Collection Dia De Los Muertos, Auburn Community Center, Auburn YMCA, Auburn Library Tabling and community events Average of 200 –300 responses on Auburn questionsOnline surveys Onboard surveys on four Auburn routesOn-board surveys Page 6 of 275 A diverse group of 27 members who live and work in Renton, Kent, Auburn or surrounding areas •Native English, Somali, and Spanish speakers, and bilingual speakers: Somali, French, Spanish, Arabic, or Farsi •Seniors, students, and riders with disabilities Mobility Board Page 7 of 275 How does Metro make recommendations? Page 8 of 275 Prioritized Mobility Needs •Service south of Auburn station •Provide more weekend and late-night service •Create shorter, frequent, reliable routes in Auburn •Establish a network of service in Auburn Page 9 of 275 7 New frequent route Investment in new frequent route between Renton, Kent and Auburn More night and weekend service in Auburn Page 10 of 275 8 New Route 184 Maintain service from Auburn Station to South Auburn This short route will provide more reliable service Page 11 of 275 9 More frequent connection between Auburn Station and Walmart More frequent service from Auburn to Walmart/Outlet Collection, Algona, and Pacific Better connection to jobs in Pacific Page 12 of 275 10 Sunday service to Green River College New Sunday service to Lea Hill and Green River College Page 13 of 275 11 Simplified connection between Enumclaw and Auburn Consolidate a peak-only route and a midday route to a single, all-day route Page 14 of 275 12 Route 910 Corridor •Route 910 resources will be invested in providing more frequent service for a majority of Route 910 riders •New frequent service on Auburn Way •More frequent service to Outlet Collection from Auburn Station •Metro is coordinating with Hyde Shuttle, Access, and other mobility providers to provide service alternatives to mobility-impaired Route 910 users Page 15 of 275 13 Route 910 Engagement •50% of the route’s ridership completed a survey (110 riders) •0% of respondents said they would no longer be able to use transit •100% of respondents felt that this change meets the area’s needs •Metro is coordinating with other mobility providers to provide service alternatives to mobility-impaired Route 910 users Page 16 of 275 Auburn Service Change Highlights 2019 Metro invested service hours in Route 164. 2020 Metro will invest additional service hours and an updated network through the Area Mobility Plan. 2022 Metro will begin planning work for a Federal Way Link Extension (2024) service restructure. 2023 Metro will begin service on the RapidRide I Line. 2024 Federal Way Link will begin service, with associated Metro restructure. Page 17 of 275 Next Steps Needs and Priorities Spring 2019 Service Change Ordinance Developed Fall 2019 –Spring 2020 Service Change Education Summer 2020 Outreach and Plan Development Summer –Fall 2019 Service Change Begins Sept 2020 •Finalization of service change ordinance •Local jurisdiction letters of support •Recommendation to King County Council •Continue to work with City on service change implementation •Coordinate with the City on service change education Page 18 of 275 Questions? 16Page 19 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: King County Metro Presentation of RapidRide I Line Preferred Alignment and Progress (Gaub)(15 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Public Works Attachments: I Line Presentation Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: King County Metro has evaluated different alignment options for the RapidRide I Line, which is planned to replace the current routes 180 and 169 between the Auburn Station, the Kent Station, and the Renton Transit Center, to provide frequent, extended, and reliable service through the corridor. Metro staff will present the locally preferred alternative, which was developed though route evaluation, outreach to riders and community groups, and coordination with city staff. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Gaub Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 20 of 275 RapidRide I Line November 25, 2019 Auburn City Council Study Session Page 21 of 275 RapidRide Overview RapidRide I Line Community Engagement Next Steps Agenda 2 Page 22 of 275 RapidRide Overview Page 23 of 275 RapidRide Expansion Timeline 4 202620212022202320242025 20272027 East or South King County Line 2021 Burien- Downtown Seattle 2022 Madison Valley- Downtown Seattle 2023 Renton-Kent- Auburn 2024 Downtown Seattle-Roosevelt Downtown Seattle- Rainier Beach 2025 Totem Lake- Eastgate Page 24 of 275 Elements of RapidRide 5 Branding Stations Vehicles Speed and reliability Service and Operating Plan Page 25 of 275 RapidRide Capital Investments Passenger facilities Accessibility Safety, comfort, and security Access to transit Speed and reliability Communications and technology 6 Conceptual design rendering of a shelter location. Actual design may vary. Page 26 of 275 Working Together as Partners 7 Ongoing engagement with local communities Ongoing coordination with the City Support transit connections and access to transit improvements Design and build capital facilities, dedicated right-of-way Page 27 of 275 RapidRide I Line Page 28 of 275 9 Benefits: Invests in getting people to, from, and around Auburn Builds off Renton-Kent-Auburn Area Mobility Plan Serves historically underserved communities and improves access for all Complements the City’s vision to provide a balanced, multi-modal transportation system that addresses both local and regional needs I Overview Page 29 of 275 10 Final Concepts Draft Concepts Needs Assessment Start Service September 2023 Final Design & Construction 2021-2023 Planning 2019 Preliminary Design 2019-2021 I Timeline Locally Preferred Alternative Page 30 of 275 I Line Budget (Current) Total: ~$117 million 11 King County Budget $51 million Pursuing FTA Small Starts Funding $56 million Target Application Aug. 2020 WSDOT Regional Mobility Grant $9 million PSRC FTA Grant $1 million Page 31 of 275 Community engagement to date 12 Metro collected feedback and shared project information the following ways: Page 32 of 275 Auburn Route and Stations 13 Station locations based on: Community needs and feedback Nearby connections to other transit, including Auburn Station Near community facilities and resources Areas that have a high number of riders Even spacing to prioritize faster trips Next Step: Identify barriers to walking and rolling to transit Page 33 of 275 Station Example: Auburn Way N 14 Serves community assets and places of employment Potential for increased ridership Opportunities to improve access to transit Page 34 of 275 Locally Preferred Alternative 15 Page 35 of 275 16 Locally Preferred Alternative Purpose Need More reliable and faster bus service needed throughout the day, into the evenings, and on weekends Serve the transportation needs of communities that have been historically underserved Provide more frequent, convenient, and higher quality transit service to attract more riders and move more people than traditional bus service. Page 36 of 275 17 Project description Locally Preferred Alternative Benefits Connects Regional Growth Centers Serves high concentrations of populations and employment Connections to regional high-capacity transit 17-mile north-south bus rapid transit service Page 37 of 275 18 Mode Bus rapid transit Diesel electric hybrid fleet Locally Preferred Alternative Page 38 of 275 19 Passenger Facilities and Amenities Number of stations General station pair locations Typical station amenities Typical passenger amenities Locally Preferred Alternative Page 39 of 275 20 Route Locally Preferred Alternative Page 40 of 275 Community Engagement: -What’s Happening Now? Page 41 of 275 Current Community Engagement Gather feedback to finalize the preferred concept, including bus station locations, amenities, and projects improving access. Community events and information tables Community and council briefings Conversations with community-based organizations I Line online open house through Nov. 29 22 View the online open house at:www.kingcounty.gov/metro/iline Page 42 of 275 Next Steps Page 43 of 275 Next Steps 24 Recommendations to King County Council I Line Locally Preferred Alternative Continue to work with City on refining the concepts Ongoing community engagement until RapidRide launches Page 44 of 275 25 Questions? Greg McKnight I Line Project Manager (206) 477-0344 gmcknight@kingcounty.gov Hannah McIntosh RapidRide Program Director (206) 263-9104 HMcintosh@kingcounty.gov Page 45 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6753 (Gross)(5 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Legal Attachments: Ordinance No. 6753 Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: For drug crimes, state law mandates that all local drug crimes have the same penalties as the state penalties. AMC 9.22.010 and 9.22.020 contains a mandatory minimum penalties that state law does not have and should therefore be removed. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Gross Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 46 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6753 November 4, 2019 Page 1 of 5 Rev. 2019 ORDINANCE NO. 6753 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PENALTIES FOR DRUG CRIMES AND AMENDING SECTIONS 9.22.010 AND 9.22.020 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE WHEREAS, RCW 69.50.608 requires that city controlled substances crimes, and their associated penalties, be consistent with state crimes and penalties concerning the same matters; and WHEREAS, the mandatory minimum penalties in the Auburn City Code for possession of drug paraphernalia and crimes related to marijuana are inconsistent with the state penalties for the same crimes; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City amend its penalties for controlled substance crimes to be consistent with those of the state’s. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. Sections 9.22.010 and 9.22.020 of the Auburn City Code are amended to read as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person or circumstance, will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Page 47 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6753 November 4, 2019 Page 2 of 5 Rev. 2019 Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Published: ____________________ Page 48 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6753 November 4, 2019 Page 3 of 5 Rev. 2019 EXHIBIT A 9.22.010 Controlled substances prohibited A. Restrictions on Marijuana. 1. Except as otherwise authorized by United States Code (USC) Title 21, Chapter 69.50 or 69.51A RCW, it is unlawful for any person to knowingly grow, manufacture, process, deliver, or sell marijuana. 2. Except as otherwise authorized by Chapter 69.50 or 69.51A RCW, it is unlawful for any person aged 21 or older to knowingly possess marijuana in an amount that violates RCW 69.50.4013(3). 3. Except as otherwise authorized by Chapter 69.50 or 69.51A RCW, it is unlawful for any person under age 21 to knowingly possess marijuana in any amount. 4. “Marijuana,” also known as “marihuana,” means all parts of the plant genus Cannabis and all of its species, subspecies, taxa and hybridizations, whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resins extracted from any part of the plant; and every compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such plant, its seeds or resin, and includes all marijuana concentrates, usable marijuana, and marijuana- infused products. Such term does not include the mature stalks of such plant, fiber produced from such stalks, oil or cake made from the seeds of such plant, any other compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of such mature stalks (except the resin extracted therefrom), fiber, oil, or cake, or the sterilized seed of such plant which is incapable of germination. B. It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess a controlled substance other than marijuana as defined by RCW 69.50.101(f) unless the substance was obtained directly from, or pursuant to, a valid prescription or order of a practitioner while acting in the course of his or her professional practice. C. It is unlawful for any person to knowingly possess a legend drug in violation of Chapter 69.41 RCW. D. Penalties. 1. Violation of subsection A of this section is a misdemeanor. For a first offense, the maximum penalty shall be 90 days in jail and/or a $1,000 fine. For a second or subsequent offense, the maximum penalty shall be 180 days in jail and/or a $2,000 fine. Page 49 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6753 November 4, 2019 Page 4 of 5 Rev. 2019 2. Violation of subsection B of this section is a gross misdemeanor punishable by up to 364 days in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. 3. Violation of subsection C of this section is a misdemeanor punishable by up to 90 days in jail and/or a $1,000 fine. (Ord. 6697 § 1 (Exh. A), 2018; Ord. 6689 § 2 (Exh. B), 2018; Ord. 6595 § 4, 2016; Ord. 6525 § 4, 2014; Ord. 6300 § 1, 2010; Ord. 5682 § 1, 2002.) 9.22.020 Drug paraphernalia prohibited A. No person shall knowingly possess any drug paraphernalia as defined in RCW 69.50.102. Possession of drug paraphernalia is a misdemeanor. A first offense of this section is punishable by a maximum penalty of 90 days in jail and/or a $1,000.00 fine. Subsequent offenses are punishable by a maximum penalty of 180 days in jail and/or a $2,000.00 fine. B. In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia under this section, a court or other authority should consider, in addition to all other logically relevant factors, the following: 1. Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use; 2. Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to any controlled substance; 3. The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter; 4. The proximity of the object to controlled substances; 5. The existence of any residue of controlled substances on the object; 6. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, to deliver it to persons whom he or she knows, or should reasonably know, intend to use the object to facilitate a violation of this chapter; the innocence of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, as to a direct violation of this chapter shall not prevent a finding that the object is intended or designed for use as drug paraphernalia; 7. Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use; 8. Descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use; 9. National and local advertising concerning its use; Page 50 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6753 November 4, 2019 Page 5 of 5 Rev. 2019 10. The manner in which the object is displayed for sale; 11. Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products; 12. Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise; 13. The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community; and 14. Expert testimony concerning its use. (Ord. 6689 § 2 (Exh. C), 2018; Ord. 6300 § 1, 2010; Ord. 5682 § 1, 2002.) Page 51 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6745 (Tate)(10 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Community Development Attachments: Ordinance No. 6745 - 2020 School Impact Fees Ordinance No. 6745 - Memo to Council Pierce County Proposed Ordinance 2019-92s Table Comparis on of 2020 School Impact Fees Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council to review and discuss school impact fee ordinance revisions and take action on the ordinance at the next regularly scheduled City Council meeting on December 2, 2019. Background Summary: Auburn City Code authorizes the City Council to establish school impact fees within city limits. This action codifies school impact fees for 2020. See attached staff report/Planning Commission agenda bill for background history and text. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:DaCorsi Staff:Tate Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 52 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. 6745 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON AMENDING SECTIONS 19.02.115, 19.02.120, 19.02.130 AND 19.02.140 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE RELATING TO SCHOOL IMPACT FEES WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has adopted a school impact fee ordinance and collects school impact fees on behalf of certain school districts located in part within the City of Auburn; and WHEREAS, the Auburn School District, Dieringer School District, Federal Way School District, and the Kent School District, each being located in part within the City of Auburn, have provided the City of Auburn with updated capital facilities plans to be considered during the City’s 2019 annual comprehensive plan amendment process that addresses among other things, the appropriate school impact fee for single family residential dwellings and multi- family residential dwellings for each district; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2019, the Auburn School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 2019 - 2025 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan; on May 14, 2019 the Dieringer School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 2020-2025 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan; on June 12, 2019, the Federal Way School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 2020 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan; and on May 17, 2019, the Kent School District issued a Determination of Non-Significance for the 2018-2019 through 2024-2025 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS the City of Auburn issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) Page 53 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 2 of 7 on September 23, 2019 for the City of Auburn Year 2019 city-initiated comprehensive plan map and text amendments (File No. SEP19-0028), and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City’s official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of hearing, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 8, 2019 conducted public hearings on the proposed Auburn School District 2019-2025 Capital Facilities Plan, the proposed Dieringer School District 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan; the proposed Federal Way School District 2020 Capital Facilities Plan; and the proposed Kent School District 2018-2019 through 2024-2025 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, following the conclusion of the public hearing on October 8, 2019, and subsequent deliberations, the Auburn Planning Commission, following individual positive motions, made separate recommendations to the Auburn City Council on the approval of the Auburn School District 2019-2025 Capital Facilities Plan, the Dieringer School District 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan; the Federal Way School District 2020 Capital Facilities Plan; and the Kent School District 2018-2019 through 2024-2025 Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council reviewed the recommendations of the Auburn Planning Commission for the school districts’ capital facilities plans at both a regularly scheduled study session, on November 25, 2019, and a regularly scheduled meeting, on December 2, 2019; and WHEREAS, on December 2, 2019, the Auburn City Council approved the Auburn School District 2019-2025 Capital Facilities Plan, the Dieringer School District 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan; the Federal Way School District 2020 Capital Facilities Plan; and Page 54 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 3 of 7 the Kent School District 2018-2019 through 2024-2025 Capital Facilities; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Code Chapter 19.02 provides for adjustments to school impact fees based on a review of the capital facilities plans for each of the districts; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2019 the Auburn City Council at a regularly scheduled study session reviewed amendments to Auburn City Code Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) pertaining to school impact fees for single family residential dwelling units and multi-family dwelling units to be applied in the City of Auburn for the Auburn School District; Dieringer School District, Federal Way School District, and the Kent School District; respectively, based on the aforementioned capital facilities plans for each of these districts; and WHEREAS, Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code specifies that the Auburn City Council will in making its decision to adjust impact fees take into consideration the quality and completeness of the information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.115 of the Auburn City Code is amended to read as follows. 19.02.115 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Dieringer School District. Page 55 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 4 of 7 The impact fee calculation and schedule below is based upon a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2020, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $7,729.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $3,514.00 (Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 1, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 1, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 1, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 1, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 1, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 1, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 1, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 1, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 1, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 2, 2005.) Section 2. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.120 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.120 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Auburn School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Auburn School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2020, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Page 56 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 5 of 7 Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $6,905.31 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit – Studio $4,667.45 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit – 1 Bedrooms $6,667.45 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit – 2 Bedrooms $9,667.45 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit – 3 Bedrooms $12,667.45 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit – 4 or more Bedrooms $14,667.45 (Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 2, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 2, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 2, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 2, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 2, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 2, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 2, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 2, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 2, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5793 § 1, 2003; Ord. 5232 § 1, 1999.) Section 3. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.130 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended as follows. 19.02.130 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Kent School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Kent School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2020, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,554.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $2,345.00 (Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 3, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 3, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 3, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 3, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 3, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 3, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 3, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 3, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 3, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 3, 2006; Ord. 5950 § 1, 2005; Ord. 5233 § 1, 1999.) Page 57 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 6 of 7 Section 4. Amendment to the City Code. Section 19.02.140 of the Auburn City Code is hereby amended to read as follows. 19.02.140 Impact fee calculation and schedule for the Federal Way School District. The impact fee calculation and schedule is based upon a review of the impact fee and calculation for single-family residences and for multifamily residences set forth in the most recent version of the Federal Way School District’s Capital Facilities Plan adopted by the Auburn city council as an element of the Auburn comprehensive plan. The calculation is the determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Effective January 1, 2020, or the effective date of this ordinance whichever is later, the school impact fee shall be as follows: Per Single-Family Dwelling Unit $5,035.00 Per Multifamily Dwelling Unit $20,768.00 (Ord. 6627 § 1, 2016; Ord. 6581 § 4, 2016; Ord. 6542 § 4, 2014; Ord. 6488 § 4, 2013; Ord. 6445 § 4, 2012; Ord. 6393 § 4, 2011; Ord. 6341 § 2, 2011; Ord. 6340 § 4, 2010; Ord. 6279 § 4, 2009; Ord. 6214 § 4, 2008; Ord. 6134 § 4, 2007; Ord. 6060 § 4, 2006; Ord. 6042 § 1, 2006.) Section 5. Constitutionality and Invalidity. If any section, subsection sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance, is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision, and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 6. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this Page 58 of 275 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ordinance No. 6745 December 2, 2019 Page 7 of 7 legislation. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _________________________ PASSED: _____________________________ APPROVED: ___________________________ CITY OF AUBURN ATTEST: _____ NANCY BACKUS, Mayor _________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Published: _____________________ Page 59 of 275 Memorandum To: City Council Members From: Anthony Avery, Senior Planner CC: Mayor Nancy Backus Date: November 19, 2019 Re: Ordinance No. 6745 – 2020 School Impact Fees BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Title 19 (Impact Fees) of the Auburn City Code contains standards and regulations pertaining to the collection of impact fees in the City of Auburn. Impact fees are authorized by state law. Specifically, Chapter 19.02 (School Impact Fees) addresses the establishment, calculation, collection and amendment of school impact fees within the municipal boundaries of the City of Auburn. The city originally established school impact fees in 1998 by Ordinance No. 5078. Portions of four school districts occur within the City limits. Pursuant to Code Section 19.02.060 (Annual Council Review) of the Auburn City Code, on at least an annual basis, the Auburn City Council shall review the information submitted by the Districts pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. The City Council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary. The City of Auburn Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment process for 2018 included requests for City approval of the Capital Facilities Plans of the four districts as follows: * 2019 - 2025 Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan; * 2020 - 2025 Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan; * 2020 Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan; and * 2018 - 2019 through 2024 - 2025 Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan. These requests were submitted in accordance with the provisions of Section 19.02.050 (Submission of District Capital Facilities Plan and Data) of the Auburn City Code. The School Districts’ Capital Facilities Plans are contained in the working notebooks (three-ring binders) for the 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, distributed to the City Council prior to the November 25, 2019 study session. Definition Page 60 of 275 The city’s code section 19.02 contains the city’s regulations governing school impact fees. It provides the following definition: "Impact fee" means a payment of money imposed upon development as a condition of development approval to pay for school facilities needed to serve new growth and development that is reasonably related to the new development that creates additional demand and need for public facilities, that is a proportionate share of the cost of the school facilities, and that is used for such facilities that reasonably benefit the new development. Related Authority Other key points of the city’s regulations include:  RCW 82.02.050 - .110 and WAC 365-196-850 authorize cities (towns & counties) planning under the Growth Management Act (GMA) to impose impact fees.  The impact fee shall be based on a capital facilities plan adopted by the school district and incorporated by reference by the city as part of the capital facilities element of the city's comprehensive plan, adopted pursuant to Chapter 36.70A RCW, for the purpose of establishing the fee program.  Separate fees shall be calculated for single-family and multifamily types of dwelling units, and separate student generation rates must be determined by the district for each type of dwelling unit.  The fee shall be calculated on a district-wide basis using the appropriate factors and data supplied by the district. The fee calculations shall also be made on a district-wide basis to assure maximum utilization of all available school facilities in the district which meet district standards.  As a condition of the city's authorization and adoption of a school impact fee ordinance, the city and the applicable district shall enter into an interlocal agreement governing the operation of the school impact fee program, and describing the relationship and liabilities of the parties. The agreement must provide that the district shall hold the city harmless for all damages.  On an annual basis (by July 1st or on a date agreed to by district and the city and stipulated in the interlocal agreement), any district for which the city is collecting impact fees shall submit the Capital facilities plan and supporting information to the city.  Applicants for single-family and multifamily residential building permits shall pay the total amount of the impact fees assessed before the building permit is issued, using the impact fee schedules in effect, unless the fee has been deferred pursuant to City Ordinance No. 6341.  The impact fee calculation shall be based upon the formula set forth in ACC 19.02.110, “Impact fee formula”. The formula is the city's determination of the appropriate proportionate share of the costs of public school capital facilities needed to serve new growth and development to be funded by school impact fees based on the factors defined in ACC 19.02.020. Based on this formula, the “Fee Obligation” is the “Total Unfunded Need” x 50% = Fee Calculation. Page 61 of 275 The Capital Facilities Plans that were approved by each of the school boards contain proposed school impact fees for each of the Districts. The requests for adjustment of the school impact fees are required to be submitted concurrent with the submittal of the Capital Facilities Plans. Under City regulations a separate letter request is only required to be submitted to the city when the fee adjustment is requesting an increase. Council Review and Decision The establishment of the actual fee amount occurs through separate Council action amending Chapter 19.02 of the Auburn City Code. Section 19.02.060, (Annual Council Review) specifies the following: “On at least an annual basis, the city council shall review the information submitted by the district pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. The review shall be in conjunction with any update of the capital facilities plan element of the city's comprehensive plan. The city council may also at this time determine if an adjustment to the amount of the impact fees is necessary; provided, that any school impact fee adjustment that would increase the school impact fee shall require the submittal of a written request for the adjustment by the applicable school district concurrent with the submittal of the annual capital facilities plan pursuant to ACC 19.02.050. In making its decision to adjust impact fees, the city council will take into consideration the quality and completeness of the information provided in the applicable school district capital facilities plan and may decide to enact a fee less than the amount supported by the capital facilities plan.” This Section provides the Auburn City Council is not obligated to accept the fees proposed by the School Districts within their submitted Capital Facilities Plans and may establish fees that the Council determines are more appropriate and consistent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitigating school impacts within the affected portion of the City. Recommendation (Contained in draft Ordinance No. 6745) Auburn School District: The Auburn School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan, that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for the year 2019. The year 2019 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,905.31, an increase of $1,189.63 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $14,667.45, an increase of $10,179.02. Subsequent discussions amongst city leadership and school district leadership has led to a recommended tiered distribution of multifamily residential school impact fees as follows: Studio $4,667.45 1 Bedroom $6,667.45 2 Bedroom $9,667.45 3 Bedroom $12,667.45 4+ Bedroom $14,667.45 Dieringer School District: The Dieringer School District is requesting an increase for year 2020. The year 2020 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $7,729.00, an increase of $4,513.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $3,514.00; an increase of $3,064.00. Page 62 of 275 Historically, the City has established fee rates for the Dieringer School district that is the same as the fee implemented in Pierce County’s fee since it is more appropriate and consistent with the public’s interest in reasonably mitigating school impacts within the affected portion of the City. Both, the school district fee calculations exceed the maximum fee obligation obligations established by Pierce County Ordinance by No. 2019-92s for final consideration at the November 18, 2019 regular council hearing; to be effective February 1, 2020. An adjustment by the City of Auburn is necessary for the fee to be consistent with Pierce County. The proposed ordinance identifies a maximum impact fee obligation for single family dwelling units of $3,815, and for multi-family dwelling units of $2,025. The Dieringer School District is the only school district common to both the jurisdictions of the City of Auburn and Pierce County. Federal Way School District: The Federal Way School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan that they are requesting an increase in school impact fees for year 2020. The year 2020 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,035.00, representing a decrease of $2,186.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,768.00, an increase of $1,314.00. Kent School District The Kent School District indicated by letter submitted with their Capital Facilities Plan that they are requesting a 2.9 percent increase in school impact fees for year 2020. The year 2020 fees for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,554.00, representing an increase of $157.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $2,345.00, an increase of $66.00. ATTACHMENTS: Pierce County Proposed Ordinance 2019-92s Table comparison of 2020 school impact fees Page 63 of 275 Ordinance No. 2019-92s Page 1 of 2 Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 98402 Sponsored by: Councilmember Derek Young 1 Requested by: County Council 2 3 4 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2019-92s 6 7 8 9 An Ordinance of the Pierce County Council Amending Section 4A.30.030 of 10 the Pierce County Code, "School Impact Fee Schedule," to 11 Adjust School Impact Fees for 2020 Based Upon Changes in 12 the Construction Cost Index; and Setting an Effective Date. 13 14 Whereas, school impact fees in Pierce County are calculated according to the 15 formulas in Section 4A.30.020 of the Pierce County Code (PCC), then the fee is 16 "capped" by a "Maximum Fee Obligation" (MFO) which changes annually based upon 17 changes in the Construction Cost Index (20-City Average) published by the Engineering 18 News Record; and 19 20 Whereas, the annual adjustment must be adopted by Ordinance following the 21 adoption of the Capital Facilities Plan and any review of impact fees; and 22 23 Whereas, it has been the practice of the Pierce County Council (Council) to only 24 adjust impact fees in increments of five dollars, rounding up to the nearest five -dollar 25 increment; and 26 27 Whereas, school impact fees are collected for residential development in the 28 unincorporated County for school districts that meet the requirements in Title 4A PCC; 29 and 30 31 Whereas, pursuant to PCC 4A.30.020, the Construction Cost Index for February 32 2017 is the base value from which changes are calculated; and 33 34 Whereas, the Construction Cost Index for February 2017 was calculated to be 35 10,559; for October 2019 it is 11,326 which is an increase of 7.26 percent; and 36 37 Whereas, the MFO for school districts effective February 1, 2019 , and adopted in 38 Ordinance No. 2018-88s is $3,770 for single-family dwelling units, and $2,000 for each 39 multi-family dwelling unit; and 40 41 Whereas, after adjusting for changes to the Construction Cost Index through 42 October 2019 and rounding up to the nearest five-dollar increment, the adjusted school 43 MFOs are $3,815 for single-family dwelling units and $2,025 for multi-family dwelling 44 units, an increase of $45 and $25, respectively from the 2019 rates; and 45 46 47 Page 64 of 275 Ordinance No. 2019-92s Page 2 of 2 Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 98402 Whereas, pursuant to PCC 4A.10.130 and 4A.30.010 C., the County has 1 reviewed the relevant School Districts' Capital Facilities Plans, County Comprehensive 2 Plan Amendments, and Title 4A PCC; and 3 4 Whereas, the Pierce County Council amended Title 4A PCC through Ordinance 5 No. 2018-13 and technical corrections to PCC 4A.30.020 are needed to improve Code 6 clarity; Now Therefore, 7 8 BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of Pierce County: 9 10 Section 1. Section 4A.30.030 of the Pierce County Code, "School Impact Fee 11 Schedule," is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and 12 incorporated herein by reference. 13 14 Section 2. This Ordinance shall become effective on February 1, 2020. 15 16 17 PASSED this day of ______ , 2019. 18 19 ATTEST: PIERCE COUNTY COUNCIL 20 Pierce County, Washington 21 22 23 24 Denise D. Johnson Douglas G. Richardson 25 Clerk of the Council Council Chair 26 27 28 29 Bruce F. Dammeier 30 Pierce County Executive 31 Approved Vetoed , this 32 day of , 33 2019. 34 35 Date of Publication of 36 Notice of Public Hearing: 37 38 Effective Date of Ordinance: 39 Page 65 of 275 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2019-92s Page 1 of 1 Pierce County Council 930 Tacoma Ave S, Rm 1046 Tacoma, WA 98402 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 2019-92s 1 2 Only those portions of Section 4A.30.030 that are proposed to be amended are shown. 3 Remainder of text, tables, maps and/or figures is unchanged. 4 5 4A.30.030 School Impact Fee Schedule. 6 7 8 PER SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT PER MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNIT SCHOOL DISTRICT School District Fee Calculation Impact Fee (Maximum Fee Obligation is $3,815$3,770) School District Fee Calculation Impact Fee (Maximum Fee Obligation is $2,025$2,000) Bethel $19,345 $3,770 $3,815 $8,728 $2,000 $2,025 Carbonado $3,594 $3,594 $866 $866 Dieringer $3,216 $7,729 $3,216 $3,815 $450 $3,514 $450 $2,025 Eatonville 0 0 0 0 Fife $4,946 $4,531 $3,770 $3,815 $2,043 $319 $2,000 $2,025 Franklin Pierce $14,038 $13,595 $3,770 $3,815 $7,071 $7,003 $2,000 $2,025 Orting $15,136 $16,477 $3,770 $3,815 $5,723 $6,587 $2,000 $2,025 Peninsula $12,154 $18,213 $3,770 $3,815 $7,181 $10,797 $2,000 $2,025 Puyallup $13,333 $17,356 $3,770 $3,815 $4,570 $6,136 $2,000 $2,025 Steilacoom $4,083 $3,951 $3,770 $3,815 0 0 Sumner-Bonney Lake $14,485 $19,654 $3,770 $3,815 $1,945 $1,872 $1,945 $1,872 White River $11,391 $3,770 $3,815 $4,001 $2,000 $2,025 Yelm $4,450 $6,417 $3,770 $3,815 $1,812 $8,387 $1,812 $2,025 Page 66 of 275 School Impact Fee Proposal  (Effective Year 2020)      School  District Multiple Family Single Family   Past 2019  fee, Per  ACC 19.02  CFP says:  Requested   Amount  Change? Past 2019  fee, Per  ACC 19.02  CFP says:  Requested  Amount  Change?  Auburn  $4,488.43  $14,667.45  Page 29    Studio ‐  $4,667.45    1 BD ‐  $6,667.45    2 BD ‐  $9,667.45    3 BD ‐  $12,667.45    4+ BD ‐  $14,667.45  Increase of:   Studio  $179.02    1 BD ‐  $2,179.02    2 BD ‐  $5,179.02    3 BD ‐  $8,179.02    4+ BD ‐  $10,179.02  $5,715.68 $6,905.31  Page 29  $6,905.31 Increase  of   $1,189.63            Dieringer $450.00 $3,514.00  Page 14  $2,025.00    Increase of  $1,575.00  $3,216.00 $7,729.00  Page 16  $3,815.00 Increase  of  $599.00            Federal  Way   $19,454.00  $20,768.00  Page 30  $20,768.00    Increase of  $1,314.00   $7,221.00 $5,035.00  Page 30  $5,035.00 Decrease  of  $2,186.00            Kent  $2,279.00 $2,345.00  Page 32 &  34  $2,345.00 Increase of   $66.00   $5,397.00 $5,554.00  Page 31 &  32  $5,554.00 Increase  of  $157.00               CFP = Capital Facilities Plan  ACC = Auburn City Code  Page 67 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6746 (Tate)(15 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Community Development Attachments: Oridnance No. 6746 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 6746 CPA19-0002 Staff Report Exhibit B to Ordinance No. 6746 - Private CPA Zoning and Land Us e Change Exhibit C to Ordinance No. 6746 - City Initiated CPA Zoning and Land Use Map Changes SEPA DNS - Addendum to Binders Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends to City Council approval of the 2019 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Policy/Text & Map Amendments). Background Summary: Case details and background information is available in the staff report found under the tab “Staff Reports/Presentations” in the working binder presented to council members. On October 8, 2019 the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, held a public hearing for all comprehensive plan amendments pertaining to case files CPA19-0001 and CPA19-0002. The planning commission continued the public hearing for P/T#5, COA Capital Facilities Plan. The planning commission recommended city council approval for all other policy/text and map amendments. On November 6, 2019 the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, held a public hearing for comprehensive plan policy and text amendment number five (P/T#5). The planning commission recommended city council approval. Prior to the study session, council members were provided with a binder containing documents related to the 2019 comprehensive plan amendment. Since the development of the binders, omissions have been identified and included as attachments to supplement information contained in the binders. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:DaCorsi Staff:Tate Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 68 of 275 Page 69 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 1 ORDINANCE NO. 6746 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING 2019 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A AND ADOPTING CORRESPONDING REZONES RELATED TO CERTAIN MAP AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, since 1986 the City of Auburn has maintained a Comprehensive Plan, periodically updated and reaffirmed by the City Council, that includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, in May 2019 the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 7, 2019; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received and processed one private-initiated map amendment for the year 2019 annual amendments; (Auburn School District as CPA19- 0001 and REZ19-0001); and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated two map amendments (File No. CPA19- 0002) and seven policy/text amendments (File No. CPA19-0002); and WHEREAS, one of the City-initiated map amendments and the private initiated map amendments have an associated rezone (zoning map amendment) to maintain consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; and Page 70 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments and map amendments were processed by the Community Development Department as proposed Year 2019 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, requires the City to maintain a current Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2019 Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act (File No. SEP19-0028 (city-initiated amendments) and SEP19-0018 (Auburn School District Elementary Site 16 private- initiated amendment) were determined to have no environmental significance; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division, and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City’s official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on October 8, 2019 and November 12, 2019, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments heard and considered the public testimony, viewed the evidence and exhibits presented to it, and made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year 2019 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments and for certain amendments, on the associated rezones; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 2019, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission’s recommendations. Page 71 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 3 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application CPA19-0001 & REZ19-0001, Auburn School District, Elementary School Elementary Site 16 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from “Single-Family” to “Institutional” and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from “R-5 Residential – Five Dwelling Units per Acre” to “I - Institutional Zone” for four parcels totaling approximately 10.55 acres, identified by King County parcel numbers: 8946700210, 0421059053, 0421059063, & 0421059015 is approved, as set forth in Exhibit B, and the findings and conclusions outlined in the October 8, 2019 staff report to the Planning Commission, as set forth in Exhibit A, are adopted. Section 2. The 2019 Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map Amendments (CPA19-0002) are approved, as set forth in Exhibit C, and the findings and conclusions contained in the October 8, 2019 staff report to the Planning Commission, as set forth in Exhibit A, are adopted. Section 3. The 2019 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments (CPA19-0002), as set forth in Exhibit D, are approved. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district’s Capital Facilities Plans are adopted, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk, and the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the October 8, 2019 staff report to the Planning Commission, as set forth in Exhibit A, are adopted. Section 4. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Page 72 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 4 Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21C.060. Section 5. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments, attached as Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, and Exhibit D when preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 6. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 7. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _________________________ PASSED: _____________________________ APPROVED: ___________________________ CITY OF AUBURN Nancy Backus MAYOR ATTEST: __________________________ Page 73 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 5 Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: __________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Published: _____________________ Page 74 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 6 Exhibit A See Staff Report dated October 8, 2019 transmitted to the Planning Commission for the Public Hearings on October 8, 2019 and November 6, 2019. Findings of Fact and the Planning Commission recommendation is provided on the Planning Commission Agenda Bill cover sheet. (Please see “Staff Reports/Presentations” tab in the working binder). Page 75 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 7 Exhibit B Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from "Single Family Residential" to "Institutional" for four parcels totaling approximately 10.55 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 894670-0210, 042105-9015, 042105-9053, & 042105-9063 for the Auburn School District Kersey Way SE Site (CPA19-0001) Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Zoning Map showing a change from “R-5, Residential Five Dwelling Units Per Acre” to “I, Institutional” for four parcels totaling approximately 10.55 acres , identified by parcel numbers: 894670-0210, 042105-9015, 042105-9053, & 042105-9063 for the Auburn School District SE 304th Street Site (REZ19-0001) (Please see “Comp. Plan Map Amendments CPA19-0001” tab in the working binder). Page 76 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 8 Exhibit C CPM #1 - Change the Comprehensive Plan Map, “Designated Areas, Map # 1.3" to change "M St SE" Designated Area to read “M St SE/NE,” reflecting the geographic coverage of the designated area. CPM #2 - Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Comprehensive Plan Map showing a change from “Single Family Residential” to "Institutional" for a portion of one parcel totaling approximately 8.4 acres, identified by parcel number: 272105- 9012 (CPA19-0002) Colored Map as an excerpt of the City’s Zoning Map showing a change from “R-5, Residential 5 dwelling units per acre” to “I, Institutional Zone” for a portion of one parcels totaling approximately 8.4 acres, identified by parcel numbers: 272105- 9012. (REZ19-0003) (See “Comp. Plan Map Amendments” tab in the working binder) Page 77 of 275 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6746 November 18, 2019 Page 9 Exhibit D Annual Comprehensive Plan Map (CPM) Amendments (CPA19-0002 – City Initiated) P/T #1 – Incorporate Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #2 – Incorporate Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #3 – Incorporate Federal Way School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #4 – Incorporate Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan P/T #5 – Incorporate City of Auburn Capital Facilities Plan P/T #6 - P/T #6 –Transportation Element (Plan) Volume 5, (incorporated by reference) The changes the Transportation element consist of the following: • Incorporate new language required by state and federal law; • Update the current transit service information; • Incorporate recent private development; • Update to include capital projects completed since 2015; • Update TIP information/project list; • Update maps as needed to reflect current data and conditions; • Remove the policies / goals related to provision of equestrian facilities. • Additional minor changes will relate to grammar, punctuation, choice of words, etc. P/T #7 - Changing the title of the “M ST SE” boundary from M ST SE to M ST SE/NE related to Map 1.3 “Designated Areas” of the Land Use Element, and change the corresponding references in the text to agree. The text changes affect the listing of economic development strategy areas and in Policy LU-133 to change M ST SE to M ST SE/NE. (see image under Map Amendments CMP #1). (See “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab in the working binder) Page 78 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Subject/Title: CPA19-0002, 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments – Specifically, City Initiated Plan Policy/Text & Map Amendments Date: October 8, 2019 Department: Community Development Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrative Recommendation: Planning Commission to conduct public hearing and recommend to City Council approval of the 2019 City-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Policy/Text & Map Amendments). Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015, the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private parties (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating: • Seven policy/text amendments • Two map amendments Also, the city received one (1) private-initiated plan map amendment by the submittal deadline which will be presented in separate staff reports for the hearing. This staff report and recommendation addresses the City initiated amendments and specifically: • Policy/Text (P/T) Amendments P/T # 1 through # 7 and • Map (CPM) Amendments # 1 and # 2. The remaining two private applications for amendments will be addressed in separately provided staff reports for the Planning Commission. In terms of process, the Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. Page 79 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 2 of 10 A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances as provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 7, 2019 deadline for the submittal of private initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application submittal deadline was provided on the City’s website, posted, advertised in the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list on May 20, 2019. The City received three (3) private initiated map amendment by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four (4) school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are proposed to be incorporated by reference in the current Capital Facilities Element (Volume 3), of the 2015 Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review decision under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared separately by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by State law (State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)). 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the remaining city initiated amendments, the City Capital Facilities Plan, and the remaining policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 23, 2019 (City File # SEP19-0028). The comment period will end at 5:00 p.m. October 8, 2019 and the appeal period ended October 22, 2018. A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder behind the “Environmental Review” tab. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; Page 80 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 3 of 10 b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. 8. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce and other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on October 22, 2018 by letter and Material ID # 25425. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. A copy of the transmittal and acknowledgement is provided in the working binder behind the “General Information & Correspondence” tab. 9. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for holding a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 10. The notice of public hearing was published on September 23, 2019 in the Seattle Times Newspaper and on the city website which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for October 8, 2018. A copy of the request to publish is provided in the working binder behind the “General Information & Correspondence” tab. Since, there are no city initiated site-specific map changes, only city-wide map changes, the site-specific noticing by mailing by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet was not conducted. Page 81 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 4 of 10 11. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text (P/T) and Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for the Planning Commission’s October 8, 2019 public hearing with a staff recommendation. Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments (File No. CPA19-0002, City initiated) P/T #1 Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The CFP is provided in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2019-2025. The CFP was prepared by the District staff and adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Directors on June 24, 2019 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following: • six–year enrollment projections • Auburn school district level of service standards • An inventory of existing facilities • The district’s overall capacity of the 6-year period • District capital construction Plan • Impact fee calculations A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,905.31, an increase of $1,189.63 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $14,667.45, an increase of $10,179.02. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2019 through 2025 to the City Council. P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2019-2024 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The CFP is provided in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Page 82 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 5 of 10 Facilities Plan 2020 - 2025. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on May 28, 2019. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following: • Overview • An inventory of existing facilities • six–year enrollment projections • standard of service • Capacity projects • Finance plan • Impact fee calculations A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $7,729, an increase of $4,513.00 and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $3,514.00; an increase of $3,064.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2025 to the City Council. P/T #3 Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2020 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The CFP is provided in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2020. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board July 23, 2019 by Resolution No. 2019-27. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following: • Introduction • Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities • Needs forecast, existing & new facilities • Six–year finance plan • Maps of district boundaries Page 83 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 6 of 10 • Building capacities & portable locations • Student forecast • Capacity summaries • Impact fee calculations • Summary of changes from the year 2018 plan A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,035.00, representing a decrease of $2,186.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $20,768.00, an increase of $1,314.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Federal Way School District’s 2020 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T #4 Incorporate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2019 to 2024-2025 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The CFP is provided in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2018-2019 to 2024-2025 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on June 12, 2019 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following: • Executive Summary • Six-year enrollment projection & history • District standard of service • Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools • Six-year planning & construction plan • Portable classrooms • Projected classroom capacity • Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules • Summary of changes to previous plan A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,554.00, representing an increase of $157.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $2,345.00, an increase of $66.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent Page 84 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 7 of 10 City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2018-2019 to 2024-2025 to the City Council. P/T #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2025, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The CFP is provided in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2025 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA requires the following: “A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.” A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2025 is proposed to be incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element (Volume No. 3). Page 85 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 8 of 10 Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2002-2025 to the City Council. P/T #6 Amend text of Volume 5, Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan. The changes are shown in strike through and underline in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion • Since the last major comprehensive plan update in 2015, the City of Auburn has completed multiple projects related to active mobility, traffic safety, and transportation network maintenance. This proposed text amendment will update dates, projects completed in the previous four years, and funding sources for programs that have been changed since 2015. • Equestrian facilities have been identified as a recreational use, and planning for such facilities will be transferred from Public Works to Parks, Recreation, and Open Space. Key Changes/Points: As part of the 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the city seeks to change the Comprehensive Plan to update the Transportation Element. The main changes to the Comprehensive Plan document include: • Incorporate new language required by state and federal law; • Update the current transit service information; • Incorporate recent private development; • Update to include capital projects completed since 2015; • Update TIP information/project list; • Update maps as needed to reflect current data and conditions; • Remove the policies/goals related to provision of equestrian facilities; and • Additional minor changes related to grammar, punctuation, word choice, etc. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of policy text amendments to Volume 5, Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan. P/T #7 Modify text in Volume 1, “Land Use Element,” item number LU-133, to change the title of the “M St SE” boundary from M St E to M St SE/NE. The same change is being made as a map amendment to Map 1.3 “Designated Areas.” The changes are shown in strike through and underline in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. Discussion The Land Use Element (Volume No. 1) of the Comprehensive Plan at Page LU-133 discusses “Designated Areas.” The boundary of the designated boundary along M Street traverses Main Street, meaning the boundary of the designated area exists along both M Page 86 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 9 of 10 Street SE and M Street NE. The proposed text change reflects this distinction. This can be identified as a minor text change. Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of policy text amendments to Volume 1, “Land Use Element” to update the text related to the “Designated Area” bounded by M St SE to read “M St SE/NE.” Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA18-0002, City initiated map changes) CPM #1 Change the Comprehensive Plan Map, "Designated Areas, and Map #1.3" to change the text of the boundary identified as “M St SE” to “M St SE/NE” to reference both directional locations of the boundary. This is consistent and in conjunction with P/T #7. The changes are shown in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Map Amendments” tab. Discussion (This is the same topic as text amendment P/T #7, but is repeated as a map amendment since it requires revision to both the text and map of the comprehensive plan document. See discussion and analysis under text amendment P/T #7.) Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change the Comprehensive Plan Map, "Designated Areas Map #1.3" to change the text of the boundary identified as “M St SE” to “M St SE/NE” to reference both directional locations of the boundary. CPM #2 Within the city’s comprehensive plan, Land Use Element, Map No. 1.1, change the designation of Parcel No. 2721059012 from split zoned to a single, consistent zoning and land use designation, to “I,” Industrial. The changes are shown in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Map Amendments” tab. Discussion Approval for the construction of a communications tower was authorized by administrative decision on December 5, 2018, subjecting the parcel to the requirements of the majority segment's zoning, I, Institutional. A corresponding Zoning Code Text Amendment (ZOA18-0001) (Ord No. 6716) amended the ACC to address the use of emergency communications devices as a land use. The proposed action changes the land use designation of the western portion of Parcel No. 2721059012 from “Single Family” to Institutional,” and the zoning from "R-5, Residential" to "I, Institutional" to reflect the zoning and land use of the larger portion of the parcel. The re-zone has been assigned case number REZ19-0003. This action serves to reflect on the city’s land use and zoning maps the approved use of a communcations device. Page 87 of 275 Staff Member: Gouk Date: September 10, 2019 Page 10 of 10 Recommendation Planning Commission to recommend approval of a map amendment to change the western portion of Parcel No. 2721059012 from “Single Family” to “Institutional,” and subsequently re-zone the same from “R-5 Residential” to “I-Institutional.” Page 88 of 275 130THAVESE133RDAVESESE 302ND PL SE 301ST ST SE305TH PL129THPLSE128THPLSE127THPLSESE 302ND ST SE 3 0 2 N D PL SE 301ST ST 1 2 9TH AVESE129THAVESE128THCTSE127T H P L S E 132 N D A V E S E SE304THST132NDAVESE SE304T H S T Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 6158Printed On: 08/20/13 Auburn School District Proposed Land Use 0 80 160 240 320 400 FEETParcels DOW NTOWN URBAN CENTER HEAVY COMMERCIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MODERATE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MULTIPLE-FAMILY NEIG HBORHOOD COMMERCIAL NEIG HBORHOOD COMMERCIAL OVERLAY OPEN SPACE RESIDENTIAL CONSERVANCY RESIDENTIAL TRANSITION OVERLAY SING LE FAMILY Existing Land Use Proposed Land Use EXISTING PROPOSED Page 89 of 275 130THAVESE133RDAVESESE 302ND PL SE 301ST ST SE305TH PL129THPLSE128THPLSE127THPLSESE 302ND ST SE 3 0 2 N D PL SE 301ST ST 1 2 9TH AVESE129THAVESE128THCTSE127T H P L S E 132 N D A V E S E SE304THST132NDAVESE SE304T H S T Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬Map ID: 6162Printed On: 08/20/13 Auburn School District Proposed Zoning 0 80 160 240 320 400 FEETParcels Existing Zoning Proposed Zoning C1 Light Commercial District C2 Central Business District C3 Heavy Commercial District C4 Mixed Use Commercial CN Neighborhood Shopping District DUC Downtown Ur ban Center I Institutional Use District Lakeland Hills South PUD LF Airport Landing Fiel d District M1 Light Industrial District M2 Heavy Industrial District Open Space P1 Public Use District PUD Planned Unit Development R1 Residential 1 DU/Acre R5 Residential 5 DU/Acre R7 Residential 7 DU/Acre R10 Residential 10 DU/Acre R20 Residential 20 DU/Acre Residential Conservency RMHC Residential Manufactured/Mobile Home Units RO Residential Office District RO-H Residential Office District (Hospital) TV Terrace View UNC Unclassified Use District EXISTING PROPOSED Page 90 of 275 S 2 77TH ST C ST SW8TH ST NE K E R S E Y W A Y S E 132 N D W AYSE1 0 7 T H A V E S E H A R V E Y R D N E E MAIN ST ASTSEAuburn Ave29TH ST SE 17 TH ST SE 3RD ST NE EASTVALLEYHWYESE 281ST ST RIVERWALK D R SE15TH ST NW TERRACEDRNWW M A I N S T ASTNW51STAVESS 316TH ST 37TH ST NE WESTVALLEYHWYN3RD ST SE SE 304TH ST 3RD ST NW 124THAVESE4TH ST S E LA K E T A P P S P K W Y S EISTNE SE 312TH ST BOUNDARY BLVD SW 15TH ST SW SE 320TH ST 37T H ST NW 10TH ST NW SE304THW AYLEAHILLR D S E 16TH ST NW CROSS ST SE 6TH ST SE 15TH ST NE 14TH ST NW 10 TH S T NE INDUSTRYDRSW41ST ST SED STNEEASTVALL E YRD S E PEASLE Y C A NYONRDS A U B U R N W A Y S 132NDAVESEWESTVALLEYHWYSAUBURNWAYN3RD S T SWB ST NWASTNELAKELANDHI LLSWAYSER ST SEM ST SEO ST SWMSTNEC ST NW112THAVESEORAVETZRDSEDSTNWRONCROCKETTDRNW104THAVESEEDGEWOOD COVINGTON FEDERAL WAY SUMNER PACIFIC PIERCE COUNTY KING COUNTY ALGONA HWY164 HWY18HWY167NW AUBURNMANUFACTURINGVILLAGE 15TH ST SW/CST SW /WESTHIGHWAY N AUBURN BLACKDIAMOND RD SE WESTAUBURN 8TH ST NE SE 312THST/124THAVE SE AIRPORT PIKEST NE M STSE/NE AUBURNWAY NCORRIDOR AUBURNWAY SCORRIDOR A ST SE MOUNTRAINIERVISTA STUCKRIVER ROAD LAKEVIEW Printed Date: 9/20/2019 Map ID: 6061/ 0 ¼½¾1 Mi The information shown and/or distributed is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data. The City of Auburn makes no warranties as to its accuracy. Map is current through Ordinance No. 6584 & 6698, December 17, 2018 Lake TappsWhite RiverW hite River Green River Green River City LimitsCity Limits Designated Areas (Map 1.3)Proposed Special Planning Areas City Limits KENT Designated Areas Page 91 of 275 Page 92 of 275 Page 93 of 275 NOTICE OF APPLICATION (NOA) and DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE (DNS) 2019 Annual Comprehensive Plan Text & Map Amendments and related zoning map amendments SEP19-0028 / CPA19-0002 The City of Auburn is issuing a Notice of Application (NOA) and Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the following described proposal. The applications and listed studies may be reviewed at the Community Development & Public Works Department at One E Main St., 2nd Floor, Customer Service Center, Auburn, WA 98001. Proposal and Location: Adopt amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan consisting of the following Text (P/T) and Map (CPM) Amendments and amendments to zoning map (rezone) to implement: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments P/T #5 – City of Auburn 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan P/T #6 – Change Volume 5, Transportation Element (incorporated by reference). The changes to the Transportation Element are focused on the following subject areas: • Incorporate new language required by state and federal law; • Update the current transit service information; • Incorporate recent private development; • Update to include capital projects completed since 2015; • Update TIP information/project list; • Update maps as needed to reflect current data and conditions; • Remove the policies/goals related to provision of equestrian facilities; and • Additional minor changes will relate to grammar, punctuation, word choice, etc P/T #7 – Change the title of the “M St SE” boundary from M St SE to M St SE/NE on Map 1.3 “Designated Areas” of the Land Use Element. The list of economic development strategy areas and LU-133 require updating to reflect the same. The minor text change includes M St SE to M St SE/NE (see image under Map Amendments CMP #1). Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments CPM #1 - City-initiated request Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map No. 1.3 in Vol. 1, Land Use Element to reflect a minor change to label the title of the M St SE boundary to M St SE/NE. This is consistent and in conjunction with P/T #7. CMP #2 – City-initiated request Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map No. 1.1 in Vol. 1, Land Use Element 1 to change Parcel No. 272105-9012. This parcel is divided by two public roadways and features a split land use designation between “Institutional” and “Single Family.” The majority (eastern portion) of the parcel is designated as “Institutional.” Similarly, the parcel is split-zoned between “I, Institutional” and “R-5, Residential” with the majority of the parcel zoned “I, Institutional.” As part of the annual amendment cycle, the city would like to change the land use designation and the zoning of the portion of the parcel designated “Single Family” (western portion) and zoned R-5, to being designated and zoned Institutional. Notice of Application: September 23, 2019 Application Complete: September 12, 2019 Permit Application: August 12, 2019 File Nos. SEP19-0028 CPA19-0002 Applicant: Anthony Avery, Senior Planner Page 94 of 275 Page 95 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6749 (Tate)(5 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Community Development Attachments: Ordinance No. 6749 Ordinance No. 6749 - Exhibit A Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: Over the last 10 years City Council has made it a practice to remove fees from city code in favor of placing them in the City’s master fee schedule that is updated on an annual basis. If adopted, Ordinance 6749 has the effect of removing specific fees from city code and placing them in the master fee schedule that is adopted through Resolution. Placing fees in a master fee schedule that is adopted by resolution accomplishes two primary objectives: 1. Places all city fees in a central location. This allows customers to find fees in a single document rather than having them spread through the city code. 2. Enables a more efficient process for considering annual fee updates that can be acted upon through resolution instead of an ordinance change. Ordinance changes require more administrative effort than resolution updates. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:DaCorsi Staff:Tate Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 96 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6749 December 2, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2018 ORDINANCE NO. 6749 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LICENSE FEES, AMENDING SECTION 5.20.030 OF THE AUBURN CITY CODE WHEREAS, Section 5.20.030 of the Auburn City Code (“ACC”) establishes individual business license fees; and, WHEREAS, the City has moved administrative fees out of the municipal code to the fee schedule so that amendments are more easily managed, and so that fees are easier for the public to find, and staff recommends these fees also be moved. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Amendment to City Code. Section 5.20.030 of the Auburn City Code is amended to read as shown in Exhibit A. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 5. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person or circumstance, will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Page 97 of 275 -------------------------------- Ordinance No. 6749 December 2, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2018 Section 6. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Published: ____________________ Page 98 of 275 Ordinance 6749 – Exhibit A 5.20.030 License required – Fee – Term – Notices – Exemptions | Auburn City Code Page 1 of 3 The Auburn City Code is current through Ordinance 6719, and legislation passed through June 17, 201… 5.20.030 License required – Fee – Term – Notices – Exemptions. A. It is unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to engage in any business as provided in this chapter within the city limits without first obtaining a license pursuant to the provisions of this chapter. B. The fee licensing under the provisions of this chapter shall be as shall be as established in the City’s Fee Schedule.follows: Type Fee Term Initial Renewal Ambulance Services License Business No Fee No Fee 1/1 – 12/31 Attendant No Fee No Fee 1/1 – 12/31 Amusement Device License 1 to 4 $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 5 or more $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Auto Races License $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Cabaret License $50.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Carnivals, Circuses, Shows, etc., Licenses Carnival/circus $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Theater $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Show/exhibition $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Public amusement $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Dance License $50.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Fire Extinguisher Without testing $30.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 With testing $45.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Fireworks Stands License $70.00 $20.00 Noon 6/28 to Noon 7/6 (Regulation of fireworks stands under Chapter 8.24 ACC) Massage Business, Health Salon, Public Bathhouse Page 99 of 275 Ordinance 6749 – Exhibit A 5.20.030 License required – Fee – Term – Notices – Exemptions | Auburn City Code Page 2 of 3 The Auburn City Code is current through Ordinance 6719, and legislation passed through June 17, 201… Type Fee Term Initial Renewal License Business $85.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Attendant $85.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Merchant Patrol, Private Detective License Merchant patrol agency $55.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Patrolman $55.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Detective agency $55.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Detective $55.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Motor Vehicle Wreckers License $70.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Outdoor Musical Entertainment License $85.00/Event 1/1 – 12/31 Pawnbrokers/Secondhand Dealers License $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Solicitor License Master $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Agent $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Individual $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Taxicab License – Requires King County license only to operate in Auburn Tow Truck Business License Business $60.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Driver $40.00 $20.00 1/1 – 12/31 Marijuana Related Businesses $500.00 $500.00 1/1 – 12/31 C. A duplicate license shall be issued by the business license clerk, as designated by the mayor, to replace any license previously issued which has been lost, stolen, defaced or destroyed, upon the filing of an affidavit attesting to such fact and the paying to the business license clerk of a fee of $1.00. DC. Any notice required by this chapter to be mailed to any licensee shall be sent by ordinary mail, addressed to the address of the licensee shown by the records of the business license clerk or, if no such address is shown, to such address as the business license clerk is able to ascertain by reasonable effort. Failure of the Page 100 of 275 Ordinance 6749 – Exhibit A 5.20.030 License required – Fee – Term – Notices – Exemptions | Auburn City Code Page 3 of 3 The Auburn City Code is current through Ordinance 6719, and legislation passed through June 17, 201… licensee to receive such mailed notice shall not release the licensee from any fees or penalties thereon, nor shall such failure operate to extend any time limit set by the provisions of this chapter. E. This section grants an exemption from paying a fee for any licenses required under the provisions of this chapter to bona fide nonprofit, charitable, religious, or philanthropic persons or organizations. 1. Any person or organization claiming the exemptions of this section shall file with the business license clerk an affidavit setting forth facts sufficient to show the application of this section and the right to such exemption. 2. Persons or organizations required to be licensed by the state of Washington, wherein the state has preempted the field of endeavor of any such persons or organizations, shall not be required to obtain a license from the city under the provisions of this title; provided however, any such persons or organizations doing business within the city limits of the city shall carry the state license on his or her person at all times when doing business within the city, and shall exhibit such state license whenever he or she is requested to do so by any police officer or any person who asks to see the same. (Ord. 6613 § 6, 2016; Ord. 6309 § 4, 2010; Ord. 5897 § 7, 2005; Ord. 4012 § 2, 1984.) Page 101 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6731 (Gaub)(5 Minutes) Date: November 4, 2019 Department: Public Works Attachments: Renewal Ordinance No. 6731 Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Discussion of Draft Ordinance No. 6731 for Astound Broadband, LLCs Telecommunications System Franchise Renewal. Background Summary: Astound Broadband, LLC has applied for renewal and amendment to their existing Franchise Agreement to continue to operate within the City’s rights of way a telecommunications system throughout the City. The applicant is currently in compliance with all licensing, bonding and insurance requirements of the existing Franchise Agreement and Auburn City Code. Any construction, maintenance, improvements or changes to Astound’s facilities are managed through the City’s permitting processes that are a requirement of the existing Franchise Agreement. Approval of Ordinance No. 6731 would renew Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 for an additional five years from the effective date of Ordinance No. 6731 and amend Ordinance No. 6555 to update Astound’s contact address, the Franchise Number, and make minor amendments to the language consistent with the City’s current standard language for franchise agreements. Per Auburn City Code 20.06.130 and Section 3 of existing Franchise Agreement No. 14-51, Ordinance No. 6555, the Grantee may renew this Franchise for an additional five year period upon submission and approval of the application specified under ACC 20.06.130. A Public Hearing for this renewal is scheduled before City Council on December 2, 2019 in accordance with Auburn City Code 20.06.140. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Gaub Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 102 of 275 Page 103 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 1 of 7 ORDINANCE NO. 6731 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE RENEWAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 6555, WITH AMENDMENTS, FOR ASTOUND BROADBAND, LLC, A WASHINGTON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FRANCHISE AGREEMENT NO. FRN19-0015, FOR A TELECOMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WHEREAS, on March 16, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6555, granting a telecommunications franchise to Astound Broadband, LLC; and WHEREAS, Astound Broadband, LLC wishes to renew said Franchise Agreement for an additional five-year term; and WHEREAS, the City has changed permitting and tracking systems for such agreements and Franchise Agreement No. 14-51 has an updated system identification number: FRN19-0015 for Astound Broadband LLC; and WHEREAS, following proper notice, the City Council held a public hearing on Astound Broadband, LLC’s request for renewal of Ordinance No. 6555, at which time representatives of Astound Broadband, LLC and interested residents were heard in a full public proceeding affording opportunity for comment by any and all persons desiring to be heard; and WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing recital clauses and from information presented at such public hearing and from facts and circumstances developed or discovered through independent study and investigation, the City Council now Page 104 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 2 of 7 deems it appropriate and in the best interest of the City that the renewal of Ordinance No. 6555 be granted to Astound Broadband, LLC. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN as follows: Section 1. Renewal. The City approves Astound Broadband, LLC’s application for renewal for one five-year period as provided for in Section 3 of Ordinance No. 6555, under the conditions set forth in this Ordinance. Such five- year renewal period shall commence on the effective date of this Ordinance. Section 2. Amendments to Ordinance No. 6555. Section 2, Paragraph A. of Ordinance No. 6555 regarding Grantee contact information is amended as follows; Grantee: Jim Penney Executive Vice President, Business and Legal Affairs Astound Broadband, LLC 401 Kirkland Parkplace, Suite 500 Kirkland, WA 98033 Telephone: (425) 896-1891 Fax: (425) 896-1911 Joseph Kahl Vice President, Regulatory and Public Affairs Astound Broadband, LLC 650 College Road East, Suite 3100 Princeton, NJ 08540 Telephone: (609) 681-2184 Email: joseph.kahl@rcn.net Section 7. Repair and Emergency of Ordinance No. 6555 is amended as follows: Page 105 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 3 of 7 In the event of an emergency, the Grantee may commence such repair and emergency response work as required under the circumstances, provided that the Grantee shall notify the City Engineering Aide in writing as promptly as possible, before such repair or emergency work commences, or as soon thereafter as possible, if advance notice is not practical. The City may act, at any time, without prior written notice in the case of emergency, but shall notify the Grantee in writing as promptly as possible under the circumstances. Section 10. Grantee Information, Paragraph A of Ordinance No. 6555 is amended as follows; A. Grantee agrees to supply, at no cost to the City, any information reasonably requested by the City Engineering Aide to coordinate municipal functions with Grantee’s activities and fulfill any municipal obligations under state law. Said information shall include, at a minimum, as-built drawings of Grantee Facilities, installation inventory, and maps and plans showing the location of existing or planned facilities within the City. Said information may be requested either in hard copy or electronic format, compatible with the City’s data base system, as now or hereinafter existing, including the City’s gGeographic iInformation Service (GIS) data base. Grantee shall keep the City Engineering Aide informed of its long-range plans for coordination with the City’s long range plans. Section 14. Indemnification and Hold Harmless, Paragraph B of Ordinance No. 6555 are amended as follows; Page 106 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 4 of 7 B. The Grantee shall hold the City harmless from any liability arising out of or in connection with any damage or loss to the Grantee Facilities caused by maintenance and/or construction work performed by, or on behalf of, the City within the Franchise Area or any other City road, right-of-way, or other property, except to the extent any such damage or loss is directly caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, or its agent performing such work. Section 15. Insurance, Paragraphs A 2 and F of Ordinance No. 6555 are amended as follows; A. 2. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000.00 each occurrence, $2,000,000.00 general aggregate and a $2,000,000.00 products-completed operations aggregate limit. Coverage shall be written on at least as broad as ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractor, products- completed operations, stop gap liability, and personal injury and advertising injury and liability assumed under an insured contract. The commercial General Liability insurance shall be endorsed to provide the Aggregate Per Project Endorsement ISO form CG 25 03 11 85. There shall be no endorsement or modification of the Commercial General Liability insurance for liability arising from explosion, collapse, or underground property damage. The City shall be named as an additional insured under the Grantee’s Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the work performed under this Franchise using ISO Page 107 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 5 of 7 Additional Insured Endorsement CG 20 10 10 01 and Additional Insured- Completed Operations endorsement CG 20 37 10 01 or substitute endorsements providing equivalent coverage. F. Grantees maintenance of insurance its scope of coverage and limits as required by this Franchise shall not be construed to limit the liability of Grantee to the coverage provided by such insurance, or otherwise limit the City’s recourse to any remedy to which the City is otherwise entitled at law or in equity. Section 3. Astound Broadband, LLC shall, within thirty (30) days after the effective date of this Ordinance, file with the City, a fully executed Statement of Acceptance of this Ordinance, which written acceptance shall be Exhibit A, attached and incorporated by this this reference. Section 4. This Ordinance shall supersede Ordinance No. 6555 to the extent that it contains terms and conditions that change, modify, delete, add to, supplement or otherwise amend the terms and conditions of Ordinance No. 6555. All other provisions of Ordinance No. 6555 shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. Section 5. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation. Section 6. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, Page 108 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 6 of 7 subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 7. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: ___________________ PASSED: ________________________ APPROVED: _____________________ __________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Published: ____________________ Page 109 of 275 ------------------------------ Draft Ordinance No. 6731 Franchise Agreement No. FRN19-0015 Renewal (Former Franchise Agreement No. 14-51) October 21, 2019 Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT “A” STATEMENT OF ACCEPTANCE Astound Broadband, LLC., for itself, its successors and assigns, hereby accepts and agrees to be bound by all lawful terms, conditions and provisions of the Franchise Agreement, Ordinance No. 6555, incorporated herein by this reference as amended by Ordinance No. 6731. Astound Broadband, LLC 650 College Road East, Suite 3100 Princeton, NJ 08540 By: Date: Name: Title: STATE OF _______________) )ss. COUNTY OF _____________ ) On this ____ day of _______________, 2019, before me the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the State of __________, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared, __________________ of _________, the company that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said company, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he/she is authorized to execute said instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal on the date hereinabove set forth. Signature NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of ___________, residing at MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Page 110 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: ADA Transition Plan (Gaub)(10 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Public Works Attachments: 2019 Draft ADA Trans ition Plan for Facilities in the Public Right of Way Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that all public facilities are readily accessible and usable by persons with disabilities and has a requirement that Agencies adopt a plan for how they plan to manage the transition of facilities that are not compliant into compliant status. Therefore, the Public Works Department has drafted an ADA Transition Plan for Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. This plan is currently posted on the City's website for public review and comment. The draft plan documents the policies, standards, and general processes that support reaching full compliance with ADA requirements for facilities in the public right-of-way. The Plan includes the following elements that will be presented and discussed: Overview and Background Self-Evaluation Policies and Procedures Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Gaub Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 111 of 275 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN FOR FACILITIES IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY DRAFT October 1, 2019 City of Auburn Public Works Department 25 West Main Street Auburn, WA 98001-4998 Page 112 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 2 Table of Contents Part 1: Overview and Background .................................................................................................. 3 Overview and Purpose ................................................................................................................ 3 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) ...................................................................................... 3 ADA Transition Plan .................................................................................................................. 4 City of Auburn Transition Plan Approach .................................................................................. 4 Opportunity for Public Notice & Involvement ........................................................................... 4 Part :2 Self-Evaluation .................................................................................................................... 6 Curb Ramps ................................................................................................................................ 6 Signalized and Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings .......................................................................... 6 Sidewalks .................................................................................................................................... 7 Part 3: ADA Policy ......................................................................................................................... 8 Comprehensive Plan ................................................................................................................... 8 City Code & Engineering Standards ........................................................................................... 8 Development Half-Street Policy ................................................................................................. 9 Pavement Maintenance Policy .................................................................................................... 9 Sidewalks and Roadway Projects Policy .................................................................................... 9 Existing Traffic Signals and Enhanced Crossings Policy ........................................................... 9 Part 4: Procedures ......................................................................................................................... 10 Project Development and Execution ......................................................................................... 10 Interim Accommodations.......................................................................................................... 11 Project Development and Prioritization .................................................................................... 12 Funding ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Special Challenges .................................................................................................................... 13 Implementation Schedule .......................................................................................................... 14 Monitoring Progress.................................................................................................................. 15 References ................................................................................................................................. 16 Page 113 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 3 Part 1: Overview and Background Overview and Purpose An accessible community enables all people, inclusive of those with disabilities to reach their destinations in the community, gain access to goods, services, and social activities that are needed on a daily basis to improve quality of life. The City of Auburn is committed to creating and maintaining infrastructure that provides accessibility to programs, services and activities as part of the ADA Title II requirement. Based on 2017 U.S. Census data, approximately 11.2 % of Auburn residents have a disability (U.S. Census Bureau American FactFinder, 2017). Developing a Transition Plan for the public right- of-way is a considerable undertaking and requires dedicated staff, development of policies, detailed evaluation of assets, and an actionable plan to facilitate meeting the goal of a barrier free pedestrian facilities to comply with Title II. American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 made it illegal for any entity receiving federal financial assistance to discriminate on the basis of disability. Section 504 obligates both state and local governments to ensure equal access to programs, services or activities that are federally funded. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was signed by President George W. Bush in January1990 and prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. The ADA defined disability as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities of an individual, a record of an impairment or being regarded as having an impairment (ADA.gov, 2016). The Act prohibits discrimination in employment, state and local government, public accommodations, transportation and telecommunications. The ADA was assembled upon the groundwork of Section 504 but goes further to require state and local government not receiving federal funding to also meet accessibility standards. The ADA has five titles. Title II of the Act specifically addresses nondiscrimination in all programs, activities and services of public entities to include state and local government (ADA National Network, 2016). ADA went into effect on January 26, 1992. ADA requires that all facilities constructed after this date are readily accessible and usable by persons with disabilities. Facilities built before this date are referred to as “pre-ADA” facilities. Alteration of pre-ADA facilities generally requires the facilities to be updated to meet ADA requirements. Details of what types of activities and work on facilities in the public right-of-way are considered alterations and therefore trigger the requirement to upgrade the facilities to meet ADA requirements are included in this ADA transition plan. Page 114 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 4 ADA Transition Plan Title II requires public agencies with over 50 employees to prepare an ADA Transition Plan. The ultimate goal of the Transition Plan is to identify facilities, programs and services that do not meet Title II of ADA and develop a plan to conform with ADA. The ADA Transition Plan consists of a self-evaluation effort which identifies agency facilities, programs or activities that limit the accessibility to individuals with disabilities. Accessibility means facilities, programs and services that are usable by individuals with disabilities. Once self-evaluation is underway, the Transition Plan can be developed and updated to include detailed methods to remove identified barriers to access and provide a target schedule for taking the necessary steps to comply with Title II. A typical ADA Transition Plan includes the designation of an ADA coordinator; information about public notice; a grievance procedure; development of internal design standards and specifications; development of the plan with a schedule and budget; and finally, a step to monitor the process outlined in the plan. City of Auburn Transition Plan Approach This specific Transition Plan exclusively addresses facilities within the public right of way (ROW) of the City of Auburn and is a portion of the City’s overall Transition Plan. A plan to address all City facilities, programs, and services outside of the public right-of-way will be completed separately. The City of Auburn’s ADA Transition Plan for facilities within the public right-of-way includes the following elements:  Overview and background  Self Evaluation  Policies and Procedures The ADA Transition Plan will be updated periodically to reflect regulatory and policy changes. Updates to the Self Evaluation will be provided through an annual publication of updated transition plan metrics or statistics. Opportunity for Public Notice & Involvement The ADA Transition Plan was originally developed with input from a variety of different sources. The public comment period for the original plan development was from October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. During this time, the City posted a draft version of the initial plan on the City’s website for review and comment: www.auburnwa.gov/ADAtransition A request for public comments was advertised for two weeks in the Seattle Times (the City’s newspaper of record). The City presented and discussed the draft plan to the City’s Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), which is a citizen advisory board comprised of members representing various interests. The draft plan was also presented and discussed with the City Council during a Council study session. Page 115 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 5 Additionally, the City has, or will, be reaching out to the following community groups for input and suggestions. Groups and Organizations Disabled American Veterans Auburn Senior Center Auburn Transportation Advisory Board Hearing Loss Association of Washington (Renton Chapter) Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce Auburn School District King County Health Department MultiCare Health Systems Auburn Youth Resources Orion Industries Lighthouse for the Blind DeafBlind Service Center The City will continue to receive comments regarding ADA issues and the City’s ADA Transition Plan after the public comment period for the initial plan. These comments may be made through the City’s webpage or through direct communications with City staff. Periodic updates to the plan would reflect any changes resulting from the additional and on-going public comments. Page 116 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 6 Part :2 Self-Evaluation The City’s self-evaluation focuses on the following facilities to gauge overall ADA compliance in the public right-of-way:  Curb Ramps  Signalized and Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings  Sidewalks (including driveways) Other facilities such as railroad crossings, medians and parking are also observed and evaluated but are not specifically inventoried. Geographic Information System (GIS) is utilized to spatially track and analyze the findings gathered from the City wide self-evaluation. Curb Ramps The following key indicators are utilized to determine if a curb ramp is ADA compliant:  Ramp Slope  Landing  Detectable Surface  Counter Slope  Orientation In 2016, the City compiled an inventory of its existing curb ramps using field surveys and GIS. The inventory collected data needed to determine whether or not an existing curb ramp was ADA compliant. The inventory also identified locations where missing curb ramps created an accessibility obstruction. The inventory revealed the following key statistics that will be compared to future years as a metric of progression towards full ADA compliance: Page 117 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 7 Signalized and Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings The three types of signalized and enhanced pedestrian crossings owned and maintained by the City are listed below, along with the number of each type within the City’s responsibility:  Full traffic signal with pedestrian facilities incorporated 85  Pedestrian only traffic signals 6  Mid-block crosswalks and crosswalks at un-controlled intersections with enhanced treatment (Rapid Rectangular Flashing Beacon – RRFB, or other treatment) 13 The City’s signalized and enhanced pedestrian facilities are included in its asset management system, which allows the City to track the following key indicators utilized to determine if a signal or enhanced crossing is ADA compliant:  Pedestrian Signal Head (not applicable to RRFB crossings)  Pedestrian Push Button Function  Crossing Time (Tracked with our Signal System) The City plans on field surveying all pushbutton locations and reach distances in the future. Sidewalks The information currently within the City’s GIS system does not include data required to determine if sidewalks are ADA compliant. Field observations and surveys are performed on a site by site basis as needed to determine details related to ADA compliance. These details include:  Condition  Running Slope  Cross Slope  Width  Encroachments or Obstructions Significant resources, beyond those currently available to the City, would be needed to develop and maintain a Citywide inventory that includes the details listed above. However, City staff is currently evaluating how the City’s GIS sidewalk information can be expanded to allow all, or some, of the ADA related data to be entered and managed as it is collected for specific sites. Page 118 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 8 Part 3: ADA Policy Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Comp Plan) is the framework for transportation planning in Auburn. It functions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system. The Plan evaluates the existing system and the deficiencies where improvements are needed. These findings are then incorporated into a needs assessment, which guides the future of the transportation system. Chapter 5 of the Comp Plan establishes transportation objectives and associated policies. It establishes “Complete Streets” as an objective: Ensure Auburn’s transportation system is designed to enable comprehensive, integrated, safe access for users of all ages and abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit riders and operators, and truck operators. The Comp Plan states the following policy associated with the objective: Ensure the transportation system meets the requirements outlined in the Americans with Disabilities Act. This policy sets the foundation for implementing the ADA Transition Plan in the City. City Code & Engineering Standards Auburn City Code (ACC) Section 12.04.020 requires that all public work undertaken by the City and all work within City public rights-of-way conform to the City’s Engineering Design and Construction Standards (Engineering Standards). ACC Section 12.04.010 establishes the City Engineer as the authority to approve, supplement and amend the Engineering Standards in consultation with the City Council on policy issues and for issues with broad citywide implications. Engineering Standards include ADA related policy, requirements, and specific standards for facilities within the City rights-of-way. The Engineering Standards are generally based on the Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right of Way (PROWAG DRAFT 2011) and also reference and adopt applicable portions of the current Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), WSDOT Design Manual, and WSDOT Standard Plans. The Engineering Standards include the following key ADA related policies that have been established in consultation with the City Council:  Establishment that: “All streets shall be designed and constructed to comply with Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) laws”  Criteria for utility trenching and roadway restoration work that triggers ADA upgrades and improvements to curbs without ramps, existing curb ramps, and traffic signal pedestrian push buttons The Engineering Standards include and address the following specific design requirements related to ADA compliance:  Sidewalk, driveway, curb ramp design criteria  Crosswalk design requirements Page 119 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 9  Pedestrian signal design requirements  Construction work zone requirements Development Half-Street Policy Requiring developers to participate in the replacement and expansion of facilities in the public rights-of-way supports the City’s overall ADA Transition Plan. ACC Section 12.64A establishes the types of development activity that require the developer to construct public improvements. The extents of the required public improvements consist of motorized and non-motorized facilities along the development frontage and are referred to as “Half-Street Improvements.” Half-Street Improvements typically include the construction of new ADA compliant sidewalks, ramps, and driveways and replacing any existing facilities along the frontage that are not ADA compliant. Pavement Maintenance Policy With this ADA Transition Plan, the City adopts the policy established in Chapter 1510.05(2) of the WSDOT Design Manual that establishes which types of pavement maintenance activities trigger ADA improvements as part of the project. Per this policy, the following pavement maintenance activities do not trigger ADA improvements:  Crack sealing  Slurry seal  Spot pavement repairs (pothole repair)  Lane re-striping (does not alter shoulder usability) All other pavement maintenance and replacement, including patching and grind/overlaying may require upgrade and/or installation of pedestrian ADA facilities subject to the criteria established in the Engineering Standards and in this Plan. Sidewalks and Roadway Projects Policy With this ADA Transition Plan, the City adopts a policy that roadway and utility work on existing roadways without sidewalks do not trigger the requirement to construct new sidewalks where they don’t already exist. This policy does not preclude projects that include roadway or utility work from triggering the requirement for new sidewalks construction via other mechanisms, an example being Half-Street Improvements that include sidewalk construction that are triggered by certain development activity as defined in ACC 12.64A. Existing Traffic Signals and Enhanced Crossings Policy With this ADA Transition Plan, the City adopts policy for existing signalized and enhanced pedestrian crossings as follows:  If no curb ramp or electrical work is being performed at a signalized intersections or enhanced crossing location, no work is required for the signal or enhanced crossing pushbuttons as part of the project. Page 120 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 10  If a project modifies or expands any portion of the electrical systems of a signalized intersection or enhanced crossing, it must also make all pedestrian pushbutton functions (but not locations) and pedestrian signal heads (as applicable) accessible.  If a project constructs, modifies, removes/replaces any portion of any curb ramp at a signalized intersection or enhanced crossing, the project must make the pedestrian pushbutton location accessible for that ramp and make the pedestrian pushbutton function accessible for the entire signal or enhanced crossing. Part 4: Procedures Project Development and Execution The City of Auburn is improving access to pedestrian facilities by implementing ADA requirements related to capital projects, private development projects, and third party utility projects that impact the public ROW. The City of Auburn uses its adopted Engineering Design and Construction Standard Manuals. In addition, the MUTCD, WSDOT Design Manual and WSDOT Standard Plans are utilized to ensure all new construction and alterations are designed and constructed to meet current ADA requirements. An alteration typically means a change to a facility within the public ROW that affects or could affect access. All ADA requirements must be applied to the maximum extent feasible. This means efforts should be made to comply with ADA as is reasonably possible. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) recognizes there are times where it is virtually impossible to comply fully with the standards. Below are the types of projects that are required to comply with the ADA: 1. Capital Improvement Projects: a. Street preservation (grind and overlay, patching, etc.) b. Street reconstruction c. Intersection improvement projects d. Sidewalk improvement projects e. Utility repair, replacement, and improvement projects 2. Private Development Projects: a. Half street improvements including sidewalks, curb ramps and street improvements per Auburn City Code 12.64A b. Plat developments that require construction of street and compliant sidewalk infrastructure 3. Franchise Utility and other 3rd Party Work in the ROW: a. Installation of new utilities that impact the pedestrian corridor b. Repair and/or replacement if existing utilities that impact the pedestrian corridor c. Relocation of utilities to accommodate other facilities in the ROW that impact the pedestrian corridor. Page 121 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 11 City inspection staff monitors installation of all improvements within City ROW to ensure ADA requirements are met. If ADA requirements are not met, the contractor or developer will be required to repair/replace infrastructure at their expense. Interim Accommodations The City of Auburn interim accommodations may be necessary in the public right-of-way. The City will work to accommodate specific requests as feasible. Residential Disabled On-Street Parking When applicable, a signed disabled parking space can be requested through the City of Auburn. The City will evaluate the request and make a determination for each situation. This process only intends to shorten the travel distance for residential access. This does not mean other access provisions such as installing or repairing curb ramps, driveways, or sidewalks will be completed at the same time as the designated ADA parking space. The disabled on-street parking request requires the resident to fill out an application, provide their valid state disabled parking permit number, and justification as to why there is no viable accessible off-street parking. This parking designation is still subject to city codes and ordinances. The disabled parking space does not permit a vehicle to be parked in any street in the city for more than 72 hours consecutively and can be utilized by any user with a valid disabled parking permit. The resident is responsible for notifying the City when the space is no longer needed. The City, once notified, will remove the space and associated signage. Citizen Requests Reporting repairs or maintenance needed for ADA compliance is important and can be completed using www.auburnwa.gov/reporting or the SeeClickFix app. City Staff has the ability to respond to sidewalk and signal issues. If the issue is beyond the local capability to perform a complete repair, it will be addressed with a temporary fix if possible and/or prioritized for correction by a service or construction contract. In many cases, sidewalk issues can be temporarily addressed by grinding down a portion of the concrete panel or by adding asphalt to smooth the transition. Signal technicians are able to address pedestrian systems where they are installed. Page 122 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 12 Project Development and Prioritization The City of Auburn encompasses nearly 30 square miles of land that has been developed over the last century under differing ADA requirements or, for much of the City, prior to ADA requirements being in place. It follows that the broad scope and cost to achieve the goals of the ADA Transition Plan are enormous and require a strategic approach. The City’s approach towards planning, funding, and completing projects that help implement the ADA Transition Plan relies heavily on prioritization. As funding is made available to the City to complete capital projects to address ADA issues, projects are identified and selected based on the following prioritization schedule: ADA Issue Type (listed from highest to lowest priority): 1) Obstruction - Damaged or lifted sidewalk with lip greater than ½-inch. 2) Obstruction - No curb ramp present at transition from raised sidewalk to roadway crossing. 3) Obstruction – Extreme cross slope of sidewalk or curb ramp 4) Obstruction – Sidewalk path encroachment that reduces the pathway below the minimum width allowed (street tree, hydrant, sign) 5) Non-compliant pedestrian signal head 6) Non-compliant pedestrian push-button function 7) Non-compliant push button location 8) Non-compliant curb ramp 9) Non ADA compliant sidewalk (cross-slope) that is not an obstruction (not extreme cross slope) 10) Discontinuous pedestrian path between established pedestrian infrastructure Priority by Location (listed from highest to lowest priority): 1) Location for which a complaint has been received that path of use is obstructed due to ADA issues 2) Downtown Urban Center Zone 3) School walking routes 4) Walking routes to transit stops and facilities 5) Walking routes to parks, hospital/medical facilities, pharmacies, low-income services 6) Walking routes to commercial centers 7) Roadway corridors with high levels of pedestrian traffic 8) Roadway corridor with medium to low levels of pedestrian traffic Current standards require the developer of residential neighborhoods and lots to construct sidewalks and curbs (and therefore curb ramps) as part of its project. Many residential neighborhoods in Auburn were constructed prior to this standard being in place and do not have sidewalks and curbs. Unless they fall into one of the categories listed above, utilizing City funds to construct sidewalks and curbs (with ramps) in these under developed residential neighborhoods is not a high priority. Instead, the City suggests neighborhoods without sidewalks that desire them pursue a Local Improvement District (LID) or other means to finance the sidewalk projects. In all cases when a specific request or complaint is made for ADA Page 123 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 13 accommodations in the public rights-of-way, in residential neighborhoods or otherwise, it is considered to be a high priority. Funding Most ADA improvements made in the City’s public rights-of-way are associated with public and private projects that trigger the ADA requirement as part of some other activity or project. It follows that the majority of funding spent on ADA improvements is from public and private funds allocated for other activities or projects. These activities and projects include private and public utility work, paving and roadway work, construction and expansion of new building projects, and more. Funding for projects that specifically address ADA needs within the public rights-of-way is typically from the City’s Capital Improvement Fund (328). The Arterial Streets Fund (102) also typically includes funding allocated for ADA improvements on classified streets (arterials and collectors). Funding levels for these programs are set by the City Council as part of the City’s Biennial Budget process. Additional funds are sometimes available from grant programs. The Community Development Grant Program (CDBG) administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has provided funding to construct ADA improvements in low income areas throughout the City. The City of Auburn has two programs with dedicated funding for annual pedestrian, sidewalk, and ADA improvements as part of the Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The Citywide ADA and Sidewalk Improvement Program funds citywide accessibility improvements including improving sidewalks, curb ramps, removing barriers, and completing gaps. The Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program is designed to address small pedestrian improvement projects at locations throughout the City based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies and citizen requests. These programs have been funded historically at approximately $200,000 and $100,000 per year respectively. Future program budgets are determined by the City Council Bi-annually. Special Challenges Besides limited funding, other issues make it challenging for the City to improve right-of-way facilities to meet ADA standards. These challenges include coordination with other agencies, the physical topography of the City, and pre-ADA development. The City of Auburn is unique in that it spans across two counties and is bordered by several different agencies, each with its own jurisdiction over its public rights-of-way (Algona, Pacific, Federal Way, Kent, King County, Pierce County). Three state routes pass through Auburn with interchanges, ramps, bridges, and intersections that fall under the jurisdiction of the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT). Portions of Auburn are lands of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, which has sovereignty over most infrastructure within Trust lands. Additionally, Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) operates a large rail-yard and rail lines that run north- south through the City and east-west from the yard to the eastern City limits. Union Pacific Railway also operates a rail line that runs north-south through the City. Planning and constructing improvements to address ADA needs within the City sometimes requires Page 124 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 14 coordination, permitting, and separate funding from some or all of these entities which can present logistical challenges. It is also difficult to provide facilities at the connection, and sometimes, overlap locations due to differing standards, timing of available funding, and other constraints. The City’s unique topography presents challenges in transitioning to full ADA compliance. The City’s land area consists of a valley area with the Green River, White River, and Mill Creek passing through it, the Lea Hill and Lakeland Hills areas along the east side of the valley, and the West Hill along the west side of the valley. On the hillside areas, it is a challenge to meet slope requirements for sidewalks and ramps. In the flat valley areas, grading to meet ADA requirements sometimes results in standing water or other drainage and maintenance issues. The downtown and surrounding areas of Auburn were mostly developed before ADA requirements were established. This sometimes results in physical constraints such as buildings, bridges, walls, and other facilities that make it physically infeasible to construct ADA compliant sidewalks, ramps and other infrastructure without significantly impacting those existing facilities. In cases where special challenges prevent the City from constructing ADA facilities that fully conform to ADA standards, the City has adopted a Maximum Extents Feasible (MEF) process. If during the design or construction of a sidewalk, ramp, or other right-of-way infrastructure physical constraints are present that prevent the infrastructure from being built to meet ADA standards, the Engineer-in-charge will prepare a MEF Document that summarizes the constraints and the standard(s) not being met. Constraints that are considered when evaluating an MEF Document include: physical built features such as buildings, walls, utilities that would be extremely difficult to relocate, environmental constraints such as critical areas (wetlands, streams, mountains), and property impacts that would have significant negative impacts to the property (loss of parking stalls below the minimum required, loss of business functionality), and other factors that are considered on a case-by-case basis as they arise. Implementation Schedule Due to funding constraints continuously changing and re-interpretation of ADA standards, full compliance of all public facilities within the rights-of-way will likely not be achieved for several decades, if at all. Instead, the City’s prioritization of specific ADA compliance issues will allow for those elements to meet standards within reasonable timeframes given the aforementioned constraints:  Pedestrian Signal Heads: replacement of non-compliant signal heads within 5 years  Pedestrian Push-button functionality: replacement of non-compliant push-buttons to meet standards within 5 to 15 years  Pedestrian Push-button location: relocation of non-compliant push-buttons with 10 to 25 years  Curb Obstructions: improvements to remove of all obstructions within 10 to 25 years  Curb Ramps: improve or replace all curb ramps to be compliant – timeframe cannot be estimated at this time. Page 125 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 15  Sidewalks: Eliminate sidewalk gaps on arterial streets – timeframe cannot be estimated at this time.  Sidewalks: Eliminate sidewalk gaps on collector streets – timeframe cannot be estimated at this time. Monitoring Progress Additional information will be added as significant portions of the self-evaluation are completed. This plan is intended to provide a foundation to work toward an accessible public ROW and will be updated on an ongoing basis to reflect which barriers were removed with a project action or independent remediation. This is a living document. The text, appendices and requirements will likely change with each update. Routine minor updates to this plan will be made on a regular basis as improvements are completed, new barriers to access are identified or new requests are submitted. GIS and OMS are the tools utilized by the City to monitor progress of the ADA Transition Plan. The City is developing an “ADA Transition Dashboard” that will be posted on the City’s website that shows key metrics indicating the City’s progress towards implementing the goals of the public rights- of-way transition plan. Page 126 of 275 10/01/2019 Page 16 References ADA National Network. (2016, August). What is the Americans with Disablitlies Act? Retrieved from https://adata.org/learn-about-ada ADA.gov. (2016, August 12). Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, As Amended Sec. 12102. Definition of Disability. Retrieved from https://www.ada.gov/pubs/adastatute08.htm#12102 City of Auburn. (2014, September 11). Public Complaint- Americans with Disabilties Act; Administrative Policy 400-02. City of Auburn Human Resources. City of Auburn. (2016, July 20). Acceissbile Pedestrian Signal & Pushbutton (APS) Installation Policy. Transporation Section. City of Auburn. (2016, February 1). Retrieved from About Auburn Facts: http://www.auburnwa.gov/about/facts.htm City of Auburn. (2016, April 17). City of Auburn Publications and Forms-Engineering Standards. Retrieved from http://www.auburnwa.gov/doing_business/public_works/publications_forms.htm City of Auburn. (2016, April 15). City of Auburn Transporation. Retrieved 04 15, 2016, from http://www.auburnwa.gov/services/transportation.htm Department of Justice. (2009, September 14). Retrieved from ADA Best Practices Tool Kit for State and Local Governments: https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap1toolkit.pdf Jacobs Engineering Group. (n.d.). ADA Transition Plans: A Guide to Best Management Practices (NCHRP Project Number 20-7 (232)). National Academy of Sciences National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Retrieved April 2016, from http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/docs/NCHRP20-07(232)_FR.pdf U.S. Census Bureau American FactFinder. (2017). S1810 Disability Characteristics. Retrieved July 11, 2019, from https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_17_1 YR_S1810&prodType=table U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. (2009). Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (n.d.). 28 CFR Part 36.402, Alterations. Retrieved August 26, 2016, from http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text- idx?SID=56d53322fe4d51a0cddbd9a4d816bd8e&mc=true&node=se28.1.36_1402&rgn=div 8 United States Access Board. (2011, July 26). Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way. Washington, D.C. Retrieved April 2016, from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets-sidewalks/public-rights-of- way/proposed-rights-of-way-guidelines/overview-of-proposed-guidelines United States Access Board. (2016, April 11). About the Rulemaking of Public Rights-of-Way. Retrieved from https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/streets- sidewalks/public-rights-of-way Washington Department of Transportation. (2016, July). WSDOT Design Mannual M 22-01.13. Washington Department of Transportation. (2016, August 1). Standard Plans M21-01. Engineering and Regional Operations Development Devision, Design Office. Washington State Department of Transporation. (2012). Field Guide for Accessible Public Rights of Way. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/fulltext/Roadside/ADA_Field_Guide.pdf Page 127 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: 3rd Quarter 2019 Financial Report (Thomas)(15 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Finance Attachments: Q3 Report Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: The quarterly financial report summarizes the general state of Citywide financial affairs and highlights significant items or trends that the City Council should be aware of. The attachment provides the year to date through September 2019 status report based on financial data available as of October 31, 2019 for the period ending September 30, 2019 and sales tax information representing business activity that occurred through July 2019. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Thomas Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 128 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 General Fund Summary $11.9 $15.3 $9.8 $4.6 $0.6 $2.1 $4.9 $1.4 $34.5 $15.5 $6.9 $0.4 $12.2 $16.1 $9.9 $0.9 $2.2 $5.0 $1.6 $32.4 $12.5 $6.9 $0.1 $4.4 PropertyTaxesSalesTaxesOtherTaxesIntergovernmental(Grants, etc.)DevelopmentService FeesCulture &RecreationOther Fees& ChargesOtherRevenuesPersonnelSupplies& ServicesOtherExpendituresTransfersOutRevenues Expenditures $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 MillionsYTD Budget YTD Actuals (Favorable) YTD Actuals (Unfavorable) General Fund Revenues and Expenditures (Through Q3 -2019) $50.6 $57.4$52.3 $51.9 Total Revenues Total Expenditures $0 $25 $50 $75 Millions$0.8 $2.0 $0.7 $0.7 $1.2 $2.7 $2.0 $3.9 $3.8 $21.8 $3.0 $9.8 $2.8 $1.9 $0.8 $1.6 $0.7 $0.7 $1.1 $2.5 $1.9 $3.0 $2.9 $20.6 $2.8 $9.6 $2.6 $1.2 Council& MayorAdministrativeServicesCommunity &Human ServicesMunicipal Court& ProbationHumanResourcesFinanceCity AttorneyCommunityDevelopmentJail - SCOREPolicePublicWorksParks, Arts& RecreationStreetsNon-Departmental$0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 MillionsYTD Budget YTD Actuals (Favorable) YTD Actuals (Unfavorable) General Fund Expenditures by Department (Through Q3-2019) 1 Page 129 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 2 General Fund 2018 Summary of Sources and Uses Annual YTD YTD YTD Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Operating Revenues Property Tax 7 21,825,000$ 11,935,000$ 12,228,024$ 11,633,676$ 293,024 2.5 % Retail Sales Tax 8-9 18,435,100 13,677,100 13,825,585 11,825,112 148,485 1.1 % Sales Tax - Pierce County Parks 105,500 78,100 82,419 76,824 4,319 5.5 % Sales Tax - Annexation Credit - - 373,279 1,056,364 373,279 N/A % Criminal Justice Sales Tax 2,162,000 1,589,700 1,783,637 1,664,826 193,937 12.2 % Brokered Natural Gas Tax 137,900 109,400 172,481 126,785 63,081 57.7 % City Utilities Tax 9-10 4,035,600 3,029,300 3,026,859 2,851,226 (2,441)(0.1)% Admissions Tax 398,000 298,800 334,077 353,497 35,277 11.8 % Electric Tax 9-10 3,558,100 2,759,400 2,753,414 2,890,368 (5,986)(0.2)% Natural Gas Tax 9-10 1,008,000 901,100 818,958 912,333 (82,142)(9.1)% Cable Franchise Fee 11-12 950,500 711,700 694,741 717,171 (16,959)(2.4)% Cable Utility Tax 12 1,020,000 765,000 731,470 763,586 (33,530)(4.4)% Cable Franchise Fee - Capital 65,000 48,750 48,471 46,766 (279)(0.6)% Telephone Tax 9-10 1,177,900 894,500 735,332 966,456 (159,168)(17.8)% Garbage Tax (external)9-10 134,400 100,800 109,116 102,313 8,316 8.3 % Leasehold Excise Tax 50,000 37,500 197,512 189,560 160,012 426.7 % Gambling Excise Tax 415,500 171,000 276,973 313,817 105,973 62.0 % Taxes sub-total 55,478,500$ 37,107,150$ 38,192,348$ 36,490,680$ 1,085,198$ 2.9 % Business License Fees 13 210,000$ 136,200$ 126,563$ 209,934$ (9,637)(7.1)% Building Permits 14 1,070,000 912,900 627,371 738,697 (285,529)(31.3)% Other Licenses & Permits 3 557,900 438,600 766,440 452,625 327,840 74.7 % Intergovernmental (Grants, etc.)15 6,235,300 4,579,320 4,420,602 4,678,784 (158,718)(3.5)% Charges for Services:16-19 General Government Services 16 2,821,110 1,934,100 1,944,889 59,408 10,789 0.6 % Public Safety 16-17 1,048,200 786,150 847,021 775,086 60,871 7.7 % Development Services Fees 16-18 805,000 586,300 850,551 613,617 264,251 45.1 % Culture and Recreation 16-19 2,409,980 2,052,200 2,224,932 2,155,549 172,732 8.4 % Fines and Penalties 19-20 859,500 668,400 642,069 734,490 (26,331)(3.9)% Fees/Charges/Fines sub-total 16,016,990$ 12,094,170$ 12,450,437$ 10,418,190$ 356,267$ 2.9 % Interest and Investment Earnings 21 348,700$ 261,000$ 291,861$ 295,262$ 30,861 11.8 % Rents and Leases 21 849,300 703,800 793,273 829,454 89,473 12.7 % Contributions and Donations 21 25,000 21,400 26,539 46,595 5,139 24.0 % Other Miscellaneous 21 237,200 184,200 330,377 250,421 146,177 79.4 % Transfers In 120,506 102,006 104,006 77,500 2,000 2.0 % Insurance Recoveries - Capital & Operating 125,000 93,750 92,792 84,434 (958)(1.0)% Other Revenues sub-total 1,705,706$ 1,366,156$ 1,638,848$ 1,583,666$ 272,692$ 20.0 % Total Operating Revenues 73,201,196$ 50,567,476$ 52,281,634$ 48,492,536$ 1,714,158$ 3.4 % Operating Expenditures Council & Mayor 1,109,779$ 837,400$ 762,497$ 859,322$ 74,903 8.9 % Administration 2,694,148 2,020,500 1,607,681 1,227,242 412,819 20.4 % Human Resources 1,626,831 1,228,100 1,107,248 895,187 120,852 9.8 % Municipal Court & Probation 2,879,221 740,003 655,167 578,985 84,836 11.5 % Finance 3,533,140 2,736,100 2,538,235 1,118,092 197,865 7.2 % City Attorney 2,795,950 2,042,200 1,877,968 1,531,784 164,232 8.0 % Community Development 5,221,526 3,886,600 3,028,604 3,016,097 857,996 22.1 % Community & Human Services (Comm Devel)1,069,373 700,100 660,205 714,451 39,895 5.7 % Jail - SCORE 4 5,001,000 3,750,750 2,894,741 2,998,253 856,009 22.8 % Police 4 29,515,179 21,809,300 20,626,144 19,816,945 1,183,156 5.4 % Public Works 4,188,425 3,038,000 2,798,423 2,569,827 239,577 7.9 % Parks, Arts & Recreation 12,962,401 9,844,600 9,558,340 9,598,326 286,260 2.9 % Streets 4,041,472 2,810,500 2,561,410 2,633,146 249,090 8.9 % Non-Departmental 2,961,510 1,907,425 1,239,164 3,339,930 668,261 35.0 % Total Operating Expenditures 79,599,955$ 57,351,578$ 51,915,829$ 50,897,589$ 5,435,750$ 9.5 % Page Ref 2019 2019 YTD Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage 2 Page 130 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 3 Executive Summary This Executive Summary provides an overview of the City’s overall financial position for the fiscal period ending September 30, 2019, reflecting financial data available as of October 31, 2019. General Fund: Through September 2019, General Fund revenues totaled $50.6 million and were $1.7 million (3.5%) higher than budget expectations and $3.8 million (8.1%) higher than revenues collected through the same period last year. The majority of this year-over-year increase is due to two policy changes: keeping sales taxes on construction revenue in the General Fund versus transferring it to the Local Street Fund (YTD impact = $1.5M) and reimbursement for support department labor by other funds (YTD impact = $1.9M). Some notable variances to budget through September 2019 include:  Property tax collections through Q3-2019 totaled $12.2 million, which was $293,000 (2.5%) higher than budget expectations and exceeded 2018 year-to-date collections by $594,000 (5.1%). [page 7]  General Fund retail sales tax revenues totaled $13.8 million, which was $148,000, or 1.1% favorable to budget. While General Fund sales tax collections through Q3-2019 were $2.0 million higher than what was collected through Q3-2018, the majority of this increase is due to a policy change: between 2013 and 2018, sales tax dollars collected from sales tax on construction benefitted the Local Street Fund and were not distributed to the General Fund. Effective January 1, 2019, this policy changed and now all sales tax dollars stay in the General Fund to support ongoing operations. [pages 8-9]  While the 10-year annexation sales tax credit expired in 2018, the City of Auburn received $373,000 in Q3-2019 which was the result of a finding that the Department of Revenue had ended the 2018 final payments two months earlier than they should have. The revenue collected in Q3-2019 was budgeted in 2018. [page 8]  The other taxes category performed favorably to budget in Q 3-2019. Actual revenues collected through Q3-2019 were $9.8 million, which was $72,000, or 0.7% above budget. Leasehold excise tax revenues collected through Q3-2019 exceeded budget by $160,000 due to an unbudgeted leasehold excise tax receipt for the Emerald Downs property. Gambling tax revenues collected during the same period exceeded budget by $106,000. These revenues were somewhat offset by unfavorable variances in telephone tax and natural gas tax revenues in the amount of $159,000 and $82,000, respectively. [pages 10-12]  Building permit revenue collected through Q3-2019 totaled $627,000 as compared to a budget of $913,000. 407 building permits issued through Q3-2019, representing a 1.0% increase over the number of permits issued through Q3-2018; however, the valuation of those permits also declined by 12.3% during that same period. [page 14]  Other licenses and permit revenues collected year-to-date exceeded budget expectations by $328,000. A portion of this variance is due to large grading permits issued for the Huntington Woods housing development, as well as the grading permits for two elementary schools. In addition, excavation permit revenues collected year-to- date exceed budget expectations by $233,000. The increased revenue collected is primarily due to the increase in the fee structure effective this year, where the City is now closer to achieving full cost recovery on construction permits. 3 Page 131 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 4  Intergovernmental revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $4.4 million, which was $159,000 lower than budget expectations due primarily to revenues collected for streamlined sales tax revenues ending the period $272,000 unfavorable to budget. This was somewhat offset by revenues from marijuana excise tax revenues that exceeded budget expectations by $55,000. Streamlined sales tax revenues are enhanced by the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA), which was passed in 2017 to capture the retail sales tax lost from internet and remote sales. However, the bill also phases out and eventually eliminates the streamlined sales tax mitigation payments to local governments. It was anticipated that 2019 would be the last year that the City of Auburn would receive the streamlined sales tax monies, but when the 2019 legislative session adjourned (in May 2019), they voted to continue funding of the mitigation payments through June 2021. While the sales tax revenues collected under MFA are receipted in as sales tax revenue, it is deducted from the amount of revenue the City receives for streamlined sales tax revenues. The amount that the City received for MFA monies through Q3-2019 totaled $453,000. [page 15]  Culture and recreation revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $2.2 million compared to a budget of $2.1 million, exceeding budget expectations by $173,000 and exceeding collections in the same period last year by $69,000. The primary areas of increased revenues collected compared to last year were greens fees generated at the Auburn Golf Course and ticket sales for performances at the Auburn Avenue Theater. [pages 18-19] General Fund expenditures through September 2019 totaled $51.9 million compared to a budget of $57.4 million, representing a 9.5% favorable variance to budget. All departments operated within their allocated year-to-date budget through Q3-2019. It is important to note that due to the delayed timing of the payment to Valley Communications for 911 services and to SCORE for jailing services, a total of $1.4 million in payments were booked in October versus September. Year-to-date General Fund expenditures ended the period $1.0 million, or 2.0% higher than expenditures through Q3-2018. This year-over-year increase was primarily due to increased expenditures for salaries and benefits. This increase reflects increased costs associated with the Police bargaining agreements that were approved earlier this year, the impacts of the cost of living adjustments (COLAs), an increase in Council-approved FTEs (Full Time Equivalents), and increased costs associated with healthcare benefits. While these factors contributed to the year- over-year increase in expenditures, salaries and benefit expenditures ended the period $2.1 million favorable to budget due to vacancies. In addition, the year-over-year salary and benefit costs reported in the General Fund in 2019 are higher than salary and benefit costs in 2018 due not only to the reasons noted above but also due to a change in the way salary and benefit costs are allocated. Prior to 2019, salary and benefit costs for support departments (Finance, Human Resources and the Legal Department) were directly charged to other General Fund departments as well as to other City funds. Effective January 1, 2019, all salaries and benefit costs for the support departments mentioned above are now charged 100% to the General Fund. In order to recoup the cost of services, the General Fund now charges other funds for these services via an interfund charge, with an associated revenue in the General Fund (for reference, refer to the general government services line item in the table on page 16 of this report). While this change results in higher salary and benefit costs within the General Fund, the change is actually cost neutral to the bottom line. 4 Page 132 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 5 Street Funds: The City’s three street funds are special revenue funds wherein the revenue sources and expenditures are legally restricted. These funds are used for street capital construction projects, local street repair, and arterial street repair and preservation projects. Historically, the majority of expenditures in all three street funds occur during the second half of the year when weather conditions are optimal for pavement construction. Through Q3-2019, Arterial Street Fund revenues totaled $1.5 million as compared to collections of $2.6 million through Q3-2018, while expenditures totaled $1.6 million as compared to expenditures of $3.4 million through Q3-2018. These variances are due to the level of activity on projects in the fund and timing of grant reimbursements and other funding. [pages 25–26] Local Street Fund revenues of $1.5 million are in line with budget expectations, and compare to collections of $2.0 million through Q3-2018. This variance is due to a change in funding sources – last year, the Local Street Fund received revenue from sales tax on construction. Starting in 2019, the fund instead receives a set revenue amount from real estate excise tax (REET 2). Expenditures through the second quarter were $783,000 as compared with $1.2 million through Q3-2018. [pages 27–28] Lastly, Arterial Street Preservation Fund revenues totaled $2.2 million through Q3-2019, compared to collections of $2.3 million through Q3-2018. Expenditures totaled $2.4 million versus $2.3 million through Q3-2018. These variances are due to the level of activity on projects in the fund and timing of grant reimbursements and other funding. [pages 29–30] YTD Budget $ 50.6M YTD Budget $ 57.4M YTD Actuals $ 52.3M YTD Actuals $ 51.9M $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 $40 $45 $50 $55 $60 $65 Revenues Expenditures $ Millions General Fund Revenues vs. Expenditures Through Q3-2019 5 Page 133 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 6 Enterprise Funds: The City’s enterprise funds account for operations with revenues primarily provided from user fees, charges or contracts for services. All City utilities transitioned from bimonthly to monthly usage billing starting in January 2019. The Water Fund ended the third quarter with operating income of $5.2 million, compared to $4.4 million during the same period last year. [page 32] The Sewer Fund finished Q3-2019 with operating income of $2.2 million versus $1.5 million through Q3-2018. [page 33] The Stormwater Fund ended the third quarter with operating income of $2.3 million compared to $2.0 million through Q2-2018. [page 33] The Solid Waste Fund finished Q3-2019 with operating income of $299,000 compared to $485,000 through Q3-2018, a variance caused mainly by increased payments to the City’s primary solid waste contractor. [pages 33-34] The Airport Fund finished Q3-2019 with operating income of $331,000 compared to $263,000 through Q3-2018, a variance largely attributable to the purchase and sale of aviation fuel. [page 35] The Cemetery Fund had operating income of $146,000, compared to $174,000 through Q3- 2018. [page 35] Internal Service Funds: Internal service funds provide services to other City departments and include functions such as Insurance, Worker’s Compensation, Facilities, Innovation & Technology, and Equipment Rental. No significant variances were reported in these funds during the second quarter. [page 36] 6 Page 134 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 7 General Fund Revenues The combined total of property, sales/use, utility, gambling, and admissions taxes provides 75% to 80% of all resources supporting general governmental activities. The following section provides additional information on these sources. Property Tax collections through Q3-2019 totaled $12.2 million and were $293,000, or 2.5% favorable to budget expectations. As depicted in the graphic below, the majority of property taxes are collected during the months of April and October, coinciding with the due dates for the County property tax billings. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.0 $22.0 $24.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsProperty Taxes 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual $15.8 $17.2 $17.9 $20.8 $21.4 $12.2 $0.0 $5.0 $10.0 $15.0 $20.0 $25.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsProperty Tax Revenue Actuals 7 Page 135 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 8 Retail sales tax collections through Q3-2019 totaled $13.8 million, which was $148,000 higher than budget expectations. W hile sales tax revenues collected in the General Fund through Q3- 2019 were $2.0 million more than collections through Q3-2018, this is primarily due to a policy change that became effective on January 1, 2019. Between 2013 and 2018, all sales tax dollars collected from sales tax on construction benefitted the Local Street Fund and were therefore not distributed to the General Fund; effective January 1, 2019, all sales tax dollars now stay in the General Fund to support ongoing operations. In June 2019, the City issued a rebate in the amount of $47,000 in accordance with the Sales Tax Exemption Program, which is a permanent program that incentivizes construction of new or expanded businesses in specific zoned areas of the City. This rebate is reflective of the differences in retail sales taxes shown in the table on page 9 of this report. Due to the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA) which became effective on January 1, 2018, retail sales taxes collected through Q3-2019 included $453,000 from retail sales taxes collected on internet and remote sales. This is collected as retail sales tax revenue and is deducted from the amount the City receives for streamlined sales tax revenue (see page 15 for more information). While the 10-year annexation sales tax credit expired in 2018, the City of Auburn received $373,000 in Q3-2019 which was the result of a finding that the Department of Revenue had ended the 2018 final payments two months earlier than they should have. The revenue collected in Q3-2019 was budgeted in 2018. Pierce County parks sales tax revenue and the criminal justice sales tax revenue both ended the period favorable to budget by $4,000 and $194,000 respectively. Total sales tax revenues – including retail and other sales taxes – were $15.3 million through Q3-2019 as compared to a year-to-date budget of $16.1 million. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsRetail Sales & Use Tax 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 8 Page 136 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 9 The following table breaks out the City’s retail sales taxes by major business sector. Citywide retail sales tax revenue collected through Q3-2019 was $284,000, or 2.1%, more than collected through Q3-2018. The business sector that realized the greatest revenue increase compared to the same period last year was in the retail trade category, while the construction category declined 14.6%, or $257,000, compared to collections through Q3-2018. $13.8 $14.5 $14.6 $14.9 $15.9 $13.8 $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 $14.0 $16.0 $18.0 $20.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsRetail Sales & Use Tax Actuals 2018 2019 Component Group Actual Actual Amount Construction 1,763,440$ 1,506,735$ (256,705)$ (14.6)% Manufacturing 556,018 589,753 33,735 6.1 % Transportation & Warehousing 92,685 63,946 (28,739)(31.0)% Wholesale Trade 1,100,407 1,133,801 33,395 3.0 % Automotive 3,092,212 3,037,102 (55,110)(1.8)% Retail Trade 3,756,570 4,043,320 286,750 7.6 % Services 3,131,431 3,305,574 174,143 5.6 % Miscellaneous 95,789 192,684 96,895 101.2 % YTD Total 13,588,552$ 13,872,916$ 284,365$ 2.1 % Comparison of Retail Sales Tax Collections by Group Through September Change from 2018 Percentage 9 Page 137 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 10 Utility Taxes consist of interfund taxes on City utilities (Water, Sewer, Storm and Solid Waste) and taxes on external utilities (Electric, Natural Gas, Telephone and Solid Waste). Utility taxes collected through Q3-2019 totaled $7.4 million and were $241,000, or 3.1%, below budget expectations. The majority of this unfavorable variance to budget through Q3-2019 was seen in telephone tax collections. This revenue source year-to-date has declined 17.8% compared to collections through the same period last year and overall th e telephone utility tax revenue has seen a steady decline since 2010. $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsUtility Tax 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 2018 2019 2019 Utility Tax Type YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Actual Amount Amount City Interfund Utility Taxes 2,851,226$ 3,029,300$ 3,026,859$ $ 175,633 6.2 % $ (2,441)(0.1)% Electric 2,890,368 2,759,400 2,753,414 (136,954)(4.7)%(5,986)(0.2)% Natural Gas 912,333 901,100 818,958 (93,375)(10.2)%(82,142)(9.1)% Telephone 966,456 894,500 735,332 (231,124)(23.9)%(159,168)(17.8)% Solid Waste (external)102,313 100,800 109,116 6,803 6.6 %8,316 8.3 % YTD Total 7,722,696$ 7,685,100$ 7,443,679$ $ (279,017)(3.6)% $ (241,421)(3.1)% Through September 2019 Utility Tax by Type 2019 vs. 2018 Actual 2019 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage 10 Page 138 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 11 Cable Franchise Fees, which are collected quarterly, totaled $695,000 through Q3-2019 and were $17,000, or 2.4%, lower than budget expectations. $10.0 $9.7 $10.0 $10.2 $9.9 $7.4 $0.0 $2.0 $4.0 $6.0 $8.0 $10.0 $12.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsUtility Tax Revenues Actuals $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th QuarterThousandsCable Franchise Fee 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 11 Page 139 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 12 Cable Utility Tax. This tax became effective on January 1, 2017 and is also collected quarterly. Total cable utility tax revenue collected through Q3-2019 totaled $731,000 and was unfavorable to budget expectations by $34,000, or 4.4%. $0.9 $0.9 $1.0 $1.0 $1.0 $0.7 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsCable Franchise Fee Actuals $0 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $600 $700 $800 $900 $1,000 $1,100 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th QuarterThousandsCable Utility Tax 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 12 Page 140 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 13 Licenses and Permits include business licenses, building permits, plumbing, electric and other licenses and permit fees. Building permit fees and business licenses make up approximately 70% of the annual budgeted revenue in this category. Business license revenues collected through September 2019 totaled $127,000 as compared to a budget of $136,000. This shortfall relates to the timing of when business license renewal notices are paid: a majority of businesses paid their 2019 business licenses in late 2018. $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecThousandsBusiness Licenses 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual $171 $282 $225 $163 $353 $127 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDThousandsBusiness License Revenues Actuals 13 Page 141 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 14 Building permit revenue collected through Q3-2019 totaled $627,000 compared to a budget of $913,000. Revenues collected through Q3-2019 were 15.1% below collections through Q3-2018, while the valuation of permits during these same periods declined by 12.3% (after adjusting for the Auburn Apartments project, for which permits were paid in 2018). The number of building permits issued through Q3-2019 totaled 407, which represents a 1.0% increase over the number of permits issued through Q3-2018. Although the number of permits issued increased slightly, the average valuation of projects thus far this year has declined compared to the same period last year. Major projects contributing to building permit revenues this quarter includes duplexes at Country Meadows, Fieldhouse USA (an indoor sports facility at The Outlet Collection), and various projects at Boeing. $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsBuilding Permits 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual $1.5 $1.2 $2.0 $1.2 $0.9 $0.6 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsBuilding Permits Actuals 14 Page 142 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 15 Intergovernmental revenues include grants (direct and indirect federal, state and local), revenue from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) compact, intergovernmental service revenues, and state shared revenues. Collections through September 2019 totaled $4.4 million and were $159,000 lower than budget expectations. The majority of the variance to budget was seen in the streamlined sales tax revenue distribution, which was lower than expectations by $453,000 through Q3-2019 due to the Marketplace Fairness Act (MFA) which was implemented in January 2018 to capture the retail sales tax lost on internet and remote sales. MFA revenues are collected as retail sales tax revenues, which then reduces the amount the City receives in streamlined sales taxes (see also page 8). 2018 2019 2019 Revenue YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Actual Amount Amount Federal Grants 229,475$ 249,675$ 173,444$ $ (56,031)(24.4)% $ (76,231)(30.5)% State Grants 137,359 122,100 148,776 11,418 8.3 %26,676 21.8 % Interlocal Grants 47,255 12,000 38,888 (8,366)0.0 %26,888 224.1 % Muckleshoot Casino Services 766,217 902,400 908,419 142,202 18.6 %6,019 0.7 % State Shared Revenues: Streamlined Sales Tax 1,304,831 1,263,750 991,574 (313,257)(24.0)%(272,176)(21.5)% Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax 891,422 846,500 867,456 (23,965)(2.7)%20,956 2.5 % Criminal Justice - High Crime 161,902 150,000 169,308 7,406 4.6 %19,308 12.9 % Criminal Justice - Population 17,043 16,700 17,958 915 5.4 %1,258 7.5 % Criminal Justice - Special Prog.61,647 61,100 64,666 3,019 4.9 %3,566 5.8 % Marijuana Revenues 191,463 81,000 135,977 (55,485)(29.0)%54,977 67.9 % State DUI 8,755 8,700 8,548 (207)(2.4)%(152)(1.8)% Fire Insurance Tax 79,798 78,900 80,386 588 0.7 %1,486 1.9 % Liquor Excise 290,903 292,320 322,324 31,421 10.8 %30,004 10.3 % Liquor Profit 490,715 494,175 492,877 2,162 0.4 %(1,298)(0.3)% Total State Shared:3,498,479 3,293,145 3,151,074 (347,405)(9.9)%(142,071)(4.3)% YTD Total 4,678,784$ 4,579,320$ 4,420,602$ (258,182)$ (5.5)%(158,718)$ (3.5)% Through September 2019 Intergovernmental Revenues (Grants, Entitlements & Services) 2019 vs. 2018 Actual 2019 vs. Budget % Change % Change $5.1 $5.3 $5.7 $6.1 $6.3 $4.4 $0 $1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsIntergovernmental Revenues (Grants, Entitlements & Services) Actuals 15 Page 143 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 16 Charges for Services consist of general governmental service charges, public safety charges, development service fees, and culture and recreation fees. Overall, charges for services collected through Q3-2019 totaled $5.9 million, which was $509,000 favorable to budget. The primary areas of increases were in both development services and culture and recreation revenues as explained on pages 17 and 18. A process change was implemented in 2019 that significantly affects the comparison of year- over-year variances. Prior to 2019, salary and benefit expenditures for support departments (Finance, Human Resources, and Legal) were allocated between the General Fund and other City funds. Effective January 1, 2019, all salary and benefit costs for support departments are now fully charged to their respective General Fund department. The General Fund charges these other funds for these services via an interfund assessment, with a corresponding General Fund revenue shown under “General Government” in the table above (hence the dramatic change from 2018 to 2019 shown in the table above). This policy change results in salary and benefit expenditures within the General Fund to be higher than were previously reported, but the change has a cost-neutral impact on the General Fund due to the revenue offset. Total revenues recouped through Q3-2019 as general governmental revenues in the General Fund for the salary and benefit interfund charges totaled $1.9 million. 2018 2019 2019 Revenue YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Actual Amount Amount General Government 59,408$ 1,934,100$ 1,944,889$ $ 1,885,481 3,173.8 % $ 10,789 0.6 % Public Safety 775,086 786,150 847,021 71,935 9.3 %60,871 7.7 % Development Services 613,617 586,300 850,551 236,933 38.6 %264,251 45.1 % Culture & Recreation 2,155,549 2,052,200 2,224,932 69,382 3.2 %172,732 8.4 % YTD Total 3,603,661$ 5,358,750$ 5,867,392$ 2,263,732$ 62.8 % $ 508,642 9.5 % Through September 2019 Charges for Services by Type 2019 vs. 2018 Actual 2019 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage $3.9 $4.3 $4.1 $4.2 $4.7 $5.9 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsCharges for Services Actuals 16 Page 144 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 17 Public safety revenues consist of revenues received for extra duty security services, whereby police officers are contracted for and reimbursement is made by the hiring agency. This also includes reimbursements from the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) for a full-time dedicated police officer and associated expenditures as well as monies collected from the Auburn School District and the Criminal Justice Training Commission (CJTC) for services rendered. Public safety revenues collected through September 2019 totaled $847,000 as compared to a budget of $786,000. The majority of the favorability seen in this revenue source is due to extra duty overtime reimbursements exceeding budget expectations resulting from increased requests for police officer security services. Development services fee collections consist primarily of plan check fees, facility extension charges, and zoning and subdivision fees. Through Q3-2019, development service fees totaled $851,000 and ended the period $264,000 favorable to budget expectations. Total plan check revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $481,000 compared to $326,000 collected through Q3-2018 which is a 47.3% increase in revenues. Plan check revenues collected in the third quarter of 2019 were from numerous commercial and residential projects including the Cooper Gate Apartment complex (a 16 building complex), Divine Court (a 7 story mixed-use building on Main Street), and Huntington Woods which is a new single family housing development. In addition to increased plan check revenues collected through Q3-2019, both zoning/subdivision fees and facility extension fees were higher than anticipated partly due to an increase in the fee structure where the rates were recalibrated effective in January 2019 to be closer to cost of the service(s) provided. $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsDevelopment Service Fees 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 17 Page 145 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 18 The majority of culture and recreation revenues are derived from greens fees and pro shop sales at the Auburn Golf Course, recreational classes, ticket sales at the Auburn Avenue Theater, special events, and athletic league fees. Culture and recreation revenues collected through Q3- 2019 totaled $2.2 million, exceeding collections in the same period last year by $69,000 and exceeding Q3-2019 budget by $173,000. The majority of the year-over-year increase in revenues was in greens fee revenues from the Auburn Golf Course and increased ticket sales at the Auburn Avenue Theater. Through Q3-2019, greens fee revenues increased 2.7%, or $27,000 and theater ticket sales increased 19.0%, or $24,000, compared to the same period last year. $1.1 $1.4 $1.0 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 YTD 2019MillionsDevelopment Service Fees Actuals $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 $2.0 $2.2 $2.4 $2.6 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsCulture & Recreation 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 18 Page 146 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 19 Fines & Penalties include civil penalties (such as code compliance fines), parking and traffic infraction penalties, criminal fines (including criminal traffic, criminal non-traffic and other criminal offenses) as well as non-court fines such as false alarm fines. Total revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $642,000 as compared to a budget of $668,000. As seen in the table below, civil penalty revenues collected through Q3-2019 were $52,000 higher than budget expectations. The favorable variance to budget in civil penalties relates to revenues collected for code compliance penalties, which are largely unbudgeted. Code compliance penalties are revenues collected from banks on vacant bank-owned properties that are neglected and in non-compliance with City code. $2.2 $2.3 $2.3 $2.4 $2.6 $2.2 $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsCulture & Recreation Revenues Actuals 2018 2019 2019 Month YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Actual Amount Amount Civil Penalties 94,411$ 12,100$ 64,560$ $ (29,851)(31.6)% $ 52,460 433.6 % Civil Infraction Penalties 372,626 368,200 328,685 (43,941)(11.8)%(39,515)(10.7)% Redflex Photo Enforcement 6,613 0 2,672 (3,942)(59.6)%2,672 N/A % Parking Infractions 99,176 114,000 96,758 (2,418)(2.4)%(17,242)(15.1)% Criminal Traffic Misdemeanor 38,525 44,900 27,982 (10,543)(27.4)%(16,918)(37.7)% Criminal Non-Traffic Fines 37,362 32,400 46,259 8,896 23.8 %13,859 42.8 % Criminal Costs 31,969 37,800 14,966 (17,003)(53.2)%(22,834)(60.4)% Non-Court Fines & Penalties 53,807 59,000 60,187 6,380 11.9 %1,187 2.0 % YTD Total 734,490$ 668,400$ 642,069$ $ (92,421)(12.6)% $ (26,331)(3.9)% Fines & Penalties by Type 2019 vs. 2018 Actual 2019 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage Through September 2019 19 Page 147 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 20 $0.0 $0.1 $0.2 $0.3 $0.4 $0.5 $0.6 $0.7 $0.8 $0.9 $1.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsFines & Penalties 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual $1.2 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.9 $0.6 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsFines & Penalties Actuals 20 Page 148 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 21 Miscellaneous revenues consist of investment earnings, income from facility rentals, revenue collected on golf cart rentals at the Auburn Golf Course, contributions & donations, and other income including the quarterly purchasing card (P-card) rebate monies (see page 36 for more information on P-cards). Revenues collected in this category through Q3-2019 totaled $1.4 million and exceeded budget expectations by $272,000, or 23.2%. The majority of this increase was in the other miscellaneous revenue category and was due to unbudgeted one-time monies. Interest and investments revenue collected through Q3-2019 totaled $292,000 and exceeded budget expectations by $31,000, or 11.8%. Rents and lease revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $793,000 and were $36,000 less than revenues collected through the same period last year. Both facilities rental revenues and golf cart rental revenues increased $13,000 and $11,000 respectively compared to collections through Q3-2018. Conversely, deposits held through Q3-2019 for facility rentals declined $47,000 compared to the same period last year. Lastly, due to a reduction of parking space inventory due to construction projects in downtown Auburn, parking lot rental revenues through Q3-2019 were $14,000 less than revenues collected through Q3-2018. 2018 2019 2019 Month YTD Actual YTD Budget YTD Actual Amount Amount Interest & Investments 295,262$ 261,000$ 291,861$ (3,401)$ (1.2)%30,861$ 11.8 % Rents & Leases 829,454 703,800 793,273 (36,181)(4.4)%89,473 12.7 % Contributions & Donations 46,595 21,400 26,539 (20,056)(43.0)%5,139 24.0 % Other Miscellaneous Revenue 250,421 184,200 330,377 79,956 31.9 %146,177 79.4 % YTD Total 1,421,732$ 1,170,400$ 1,442,050$ 20,318$ 1.4 %271,650$ 23.2 % Miscellaneous Revenues by Type Through September 2019 2019 vs. 2018 2019 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage $1.0 $1.0 $1.2 $1.5 $1.8 $1.4 $0.0 $0.2 $0.4 $0.6 $0.8 $1.0 $1.2 $1.4 $1.6 $1.8 $2.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsMiscellaneous Revenues Actuals 21 Page 149 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 22 Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) revenue is receipted into the Capital Improvement Projects Fund and is used for governmental capital projects. REET revenue represents taxes on the sale of both commercial properties and single-family residences. REET revenues collected through Q3-2019 totaled $3.2 million, exceeding budget expectations by $1.3 million. Commercial sales in Q3-2019 included the sale of several commercial buildings including warehouses, several multi-family complexes, a hotel, a restaurant, a storage facility and several parcels of vacant land. 2018 2019 2019 Month Actual Budget Actual Amount Amount Jan 240,414$ 210,100$ 383,547$ 143,132$ 59.5 % 173,447$ 82.6 % Feb 200,783 210,100 206,022 5,239 2.6 % (4,078) (1.9) % Mar 255,218 210,100 229,181 (26,037) (10.2) % 19,081 9.1 % Apr 362,999 210,100 315,855 (47,144) (13.0) % 105,755 50.3 % May 427,054 210,100 372,394 (54,661) (12.8) % 162,294 77.2 % Jun 371,816 210,100 478,537 106,720 28.7 % 268,437 127.8 % Jul 342,006 210,100 350,228 8,223 2.4 % 140,128 66.7 % Aug 373,889 210,100 450,095 76,206 20.4 % 239,995 114.2 % Sep 387,673 210,100 398,420 10,748 2.8 % 188,320 89.6 % YTD Total 2,961,854$ 1,890,900$ 3,184,280$ 222,426$ 7.5 % 1,293,380$ 68.4 % Real Estate Excise Tax Revenues September 2019 2019 vs. 2018 2019 vs. Budget Percentage Percentage $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsReal Estate Excise Tax 2019 Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 Actual 22 Page 150 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 23 $2.5 $4.6 $4.3 $3.6 $3.8 $3.2 $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTDMillionsReal Estate Excise Tax Revenues Actuals 23 Page 151 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 24 Pet Licensing Pet licensing services are provided by the Auburn Valley Humane Society. Through Q3-2019, 3,661 pet licenses were sold, resulting in $97,725 in revenue. Through Q3-2018, a total of 3,426 licenses were sold, resulting in $89,650 in revenue. EXTEND EXTEND 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecNumber of Licenses IssuedLicense Revenue( thousands )Cumulative Pet Licensing Revenues & Licenses Sold 2019 vs 2018 2019 License Revenue 2019 Licenses Issued 2018 Licenses Issued 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecNumber of Licenses IssuedLicense Revenue( thousands )Pet Licensing Revenues vs Licenses Sold 2019 vs 2018 2018 License Revenue 2019 License Revenue 2018 Licenses Issued 2019 Licenses Issued 24 Page 152 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 25 Street Funds This section provides a financial overview of the City’s three street funds for the quarter ending September 30, 2019. The City’s three street funds include the Arterial Street Fund (Fund 102), the Local Street Fund (Fund 103), and the Arterial Street Preservation Fund (Fund 105). Fund 102 – Arterial Street Fund The Arterial Street Fund is a special revenue fund that is funded by transportation grants, traffic impact fees, a portion of the City’s gas tax receipts, Public Works Trust Fund loans, developer contributions, and other sources. As of September 30, 2019 there were 28 separate street projects budgeted in this fund. Through Q3-2019, revenues collected totaled $1.5 million as compared to collections of $2.7 million through Q3-2018. Total expenditures through Q3-2019 were $1.6 million as compared to $3.4 million expended through Q3-2018. Variances in revenues and expenditures are largely due to the timing of capital expenditures and any subsequent reimbursement via grants and/or operating transfers. Expenditure timing is generally determined by the current phase of each individual capital project; expenditures tend to increase as projects move from design phase into construction. In addition, several inclement weather situations during Q1-2019 were not conducive to street construction. Fund 102 - Arterial Street 2018 Summary of Sources and Uses 2019 2019 YTD 2019 YTD 2018 YTD Report Period: September 2019 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues Federal Grants 2,298,881$ 1,298,027$ 492,609$ 711,936$ (805,418)$ (62.0)% State Grants - - - 31,585 - Motor Vehicle Fuel and Multimodal Taxes 620,000 453,444 457,355 467,618 3,911 0.9 % Developer Contributions - - - (0) - Miscellaneous Revenue - - - 498,885 - Operating Transfer In 1,595,960 1,132,220 559,429 933,729 (572,790) (50.6)% Investment Income 28,300 19,147 33,964 22,567 14,817 77.4 % Total Revenues 4,543,141$ 2,902,837$ 1,543,357$ 2,666,321$ (1,359,480)$ (46.8)% Expenditures Salary and Benefits 132,000$ 103,876$ 203,838$ 307,635$ (99,961)$ (96.2)% Capital Outlay 4,464,858 2,757,459 915,970 2,566,494 1,841,489 66.8 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 4,596,858 2,861,336 1,119,808 2,874,128 1,741,528 60.9 % Services and Charges 400,000 209,551 89,455 215,782 120,096 57.3 % Interfund Payments for Services 78,100 58,575 58,575 59,148 (0) (0.0)% Debt Service Principal and Interest 208,300 208,300 208,122 208,817 178 0.1 % Operating Transfer Out 143,196 82,964 143,196 23,151 (60,232) (72.6) Total Expenditures 5,426,454$ 3,420,726$ 1,619,156$ 3,381,025$ 1,801,569$ 52.7 % Net Change in Fund Balance (883,313)$ (517,889)$ (75,800)$ (714,705)$ 442,089$ (85.4)% Beg. Fund Balance, January 2019 2,062,371$ Net Change in Fund Balance, September 2019 (75,800) Ending Fund Balance, September 2019 1,986,571$ 2019 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 1,179,058$ 2019 2019 YTD Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage 25 Page 153 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 26 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2019 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Notes:  Several large multi-year projects are reaching completion of construction in 2019 and several large projects are beginning design, with construction anticipated in 2020 or later. $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 $4.5 $5.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsFund 102 -Capital Project Expenditures 2019 YTD Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 YTD Actual 2019 YTD Actual: $1.1M 2019 Budget: $4.6M 2018 YTD Actual: $2.9M Name 2019 Budget YTD Actual Remaining AWS Improvements - Hemlock to Poplar $1.6M $0.0M $1.5M F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements $0.5M $0.1M $0.4M A St SE Corridor Signal Safety Improvements $0.4M $0.4M $0.0M All Other Projects (25 Others Budgeted)$2.2M $0.6M $1.5M Total $4.6M $1.1M $3.5M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Fund 102 - Arterial Street Capital Projects Status * 26 Page 154 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 27 Fund 103 – Local Street Fund The Local Street Fund is a special revenue fund used for local street preservation. Effective January 1, 2019 through 2020 this fund is funded at a specific annual amount by real estate excise tax (REET 2) whereas, previously, the funding source was sales tax on construction. Through Q3-2019, revenues in this fund totaled $1.5 million, which is slightly higher than budget expectations due to strong performance in interest earnings. This compares to collections of $2.0 million through Q3-2018. Expenditures through Q3-2019 were $783,000 and compare to expenditures of $1.2 million through Q3-2018. Historically, well over half of this fund’s annual expenditures occur in the final four months of each year due to the weather sensitivity of pavement construction (this work needs to be done primarily in the summer and early fall). In addition, several inclement weather situations during Q1-2019 were not conducive to street construction. Highlighted in the table below and shown in the following graph are the fund’s total expenditures related to capital projects. Fund 103 - Local Street Fund 2018 Summary of Sources and Uses 2019 2019 YTD 2019 YTD 2018 YTD Report Period: September 2019 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues Sales Tax on Construction -$ -$ -$ 1,763,440$ -$ Operating Transfer In 1,900,000 1,462,500 1,462,500$ 150,000 - 0.0 % Interest Earnings 12,000 8,433 58,470$ 47,781 50,037 593.3 % Total Revenues 1,912,000$ 1,470,933$ 1,520,970$ 1,961,221$ 50,037$ 3.4 % Expenditures Capital Salary and Benefits 231,616 174,264 57,056 - 117,208 67.3 % Capital Outlay 3,217,860 1,371,303 682,281 1,047,594 689,023 50.2 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 3,449,476 1,545,568 739,337 1,047,594 806,231 52.2 % Admin Salary and Benefits - - 13,667 101,947 (13,667)$ Admin Services and Charges 40,700 34,153 19,066 2,414 15,087 44.2 % Interfund Payments for Services 15,200 11,400 11,400 9,180 (0) (0.0) % Operating Transfer Out - - - 229 - Total Expenditures 3,505,376$ 1,591,120$ 783,469$ 1,161,364$ 807,652$ 50.8 % Net Change in Fund Balance (1,593,376)$ (120,187)$ 737,501$ 799,856$ 857,688$ (713.6) % Beg. Fund Balance, January 2019 2,799,957$ Net Change in Fund Balance, September 2019 737,501 Ending Fund Balance, September 2019 3,537,458$ 2019 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 1,206,581$ 2019 2019 YTD Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage 27 Page 155 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 28 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2019 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Notes:  The 2019 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction project was awarded June 17, 2019. $0.0 $0.5 $1.0 $1.5 $2.0 $2.5 $3.0 $3.5 $4.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsFund 103 -Capital Project Expenditures 2019 YTD Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 YTD Actual 2019 Budget : $3.4M 2018 YTD Actual: $1.0M 2019 YTD Actual: $0.7M Name 2019 Budget YTD Actual Remaining 2019 Local Street Reconstruction $2.6M $0.4M $2.2M 2018 Citywide Pavement Patch and Overlay $0.5M $0.3M $0.1M 2020 Local Street Pavement Reconstruction $0.4M $0.0M $0.4M All Other Projects (1 Other Budgeted)$0.0M $0.0M $0.0M Total $3.4M $0.7M $2.7M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Fund 103 - Local Street Capital Projects Status* 28 Page 156 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 29 Fund 105 – Arterial Street Preservation Fund The Arterial Street Preservation Fund is a special revenue fund that is primarily funded by a 1.0% utility tax that was adopted by Council in 2008; these utility tax revenues are restricted for arterial street repair and preservation projects. Major projects budgeted within the Arterial Street Preservation Fund in 2019 include A Street SE Preservation, 2019 Citywide Pavement Patching & Overlay, and 2018 Citywide Pavement Patching & Overlay. Through Q3-2019 revenues totaled $2.2 million, which is approximately $166,000 lower than the same period last year. This is primarily due to the timing associated with construction projects and their subsequent cost reimbursements from grants and transfers-in. Expenditures through Q3-2019 were $2.4 million as compared to $2.3 million through Q3-2018. Historically, the majority of this fund’s expenditures occur in the second half of each year due to the weather sensitivity of pavement construction (this work needs to be done primarily in the summer and early fall). In addition, several inclement weather situations during Q1-2019 were not conducive to street construction. Highlighted in the table below and shown in the following graph are the fund’s total expenditures related to capital projects. Fund 105 - Arterial Street Preservation 2018 Summary of Sources and Uses 2019 2019 YTD 2019 YTD 2018 YTD Report Period: September 2019 Budget Budget Actual Actual Amount Revenues City Utility Tax 674,600$ 506,524$ 504,476$ 475,204$ (2,048)$ (0.4)% Electric Utility Tax 711,600 547,027 550,683 578,074 3,656 0.7 % Natural Gas Utility Tax 201,600 178,379 163,792 182,467 (14,587) (8.2)% Cable TV Tax 190,100 141,765 146,294 152,717 4,529 3.2 % Telephone Utility Tax 235,600 177,740 147,066 181,330 (30,674) (17.3)% Garbage Utility Tax (External Haulers)22,400 16,800 18,186 16,681 1,386 8.3 % Grants 940,511 231,235 84,617 106,627 (146,618) (63.4)% Operating Transfer In 1,445,679 847,219 500,338 594,560 (346,881) (40.9)% Interest Earnings 29,800 22,350 36,365 30,658 14,015 62.7 % Total Revenues 4,451,890$ 2,669,040$ 2,151,818$ 2,318,317$ (517,222)$ (19.4)% Expenditures Salary and Benefits 241,000$ 178,423$ 438,878$ 287,288$ (260,455)$ (146.0)% Capital Outlay 5,230,122 2,901,970 1,894,227 2,033,538 1,007,743 34.7 % Subtotal - Capital Project Expenditures 5,471,122 3,080,393 2,333,106 2,320,826 747,288 24.3 % Supplies - - - - - Services and Charges 165,000 99,066 18,529 - 80,537 81.3 Operating Transfer Out 26,831 17,887 - - 17,887 100.0 Total Expenditures 5,662,953$ 3,197,347$ 2,351,635$ 2,320,826$ 845,712$ 26.5 % Net Change in Fund Balance (1,211,063)$ (528,307)$ (199,817)$ (2,509)$ 328,490$ (62.2)% Beg. Fund Balance, January 2019 2,044,459$ Net Change in Fund Balance, September 2019 (199,817) Ending Fund Balance, September 2019 1,844,642$ 2019 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 833,396$ 2019 2019 YTD Budget vs. Actual Favorable (Unfavorable) Percentage 29 Page 157 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 30 The table below presents the status of the projects with the most significant budget impact on the fund. Many capital projects are budgeted over multiple years; what is displayed below is the 2019 portion of each project’s budget and year-to-date expenditures. Notes:  The A Street SE Preservation project was awarded June 3, 2019.  The 2019 Citywide Patch and Overlay project was awarded May 6, 2019. $0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov DecMillionsFund 105 -Capital Project Expenditures 2019 YTD Budget 2019 YTD Actual 2018 YTD Actual 2019 2019 Budget: $5.5M 2018 2018 YTD Actual: $2.3M 2019 2019 YTD Actual: $2.3M Name 2019 Budget YTD Actual Remaining A St SE Preservation $1.8M $0.4M $1.5M 2019 Citywide Pavement Patching & Overlay $1.0M $0.8M $0.3M 2018 Citywide Pavement Patching & Overlay $0.9M $0.7M $0.2M All Other Projects (8 Others Budgeted)$1.7M $0.5M $1.2M Total $5.5M $2.3M $3.1M *Components may not sum to total due to rounding. Capital Projects Status* Fund 105 - Arterial Street Preservation 30 Page 158 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 31 Fund 124 – Mitigation Fees The Mitigation Fees fund is a special revenue fund funded from revenues from fees for new development that are assessed at the time applications are received for development activity. These revenues are used to address costs associated with City growth. The fund houses two types of revenues: mitigation fees and impact fees. Mitigation fees are variable charges collected as a result of State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) reviews and the City’s determination that a project must pay additional fees to compensate for a unique effect that it has on the community. Impact fees are set charges collected automatically for a variety of projects. These fees are adopted annually by the City Council based on projects anticipated in the Capital Facilities Plan over the next six years. About $1.8 million, or nearly 111%, of annual budgeted revenues were received through Q3- 2019. This significant favorable revenue performance was driven by the receipt of nearly $600,000 in traffic impact fee revenue in Q2 from the Young’s Market truck warehouse and distribution center. Additionally, a transfer-in of approximately $400,000 was completed in May to pay for traffic mitigation fees related to the Legacy Senior Housing Project and the Auburn Town Center. Expenditures were significantly below budget due to the timing of capital projects funded by these revenues. Of the twelve projects funded by parks impact fee revenues, only the Brannan Park Synthetic Infield project has seen significant progress. There are three projects budgeted with parks impact fee funding of at least $500,000 that have had minimal expenditures. Approximately 53% of the year-to-date expenditures of transportation impact fee revenue consists of scheduled debt service payments. Fund 124 - Mitigation Fees Summary of Sources and Uses Report Period Through:Ending Ending September 2019 Fund Balance Fund Balance Transportation Impact Fees 800,000$ 1,391,629$ 4,743,105$ 1,045,545$ 443,307$ 5,936,972$ Transportation Migitation Fees - 51,100 68,508 1,353 - 120,961 Fire Impact Fees 100,000 75,000 256,758 51,766 - 283,524 Fire Mitigation Fees - - 81 - - 81 Parks Impact Fees 100,000 2,507,077 3,183,719 70,000 424,997 5,235,799 Parks Mitigation Fees - 300,000 41,614 - - 341,614 School Impact Admin Fees 1,200 - 67,784 918 - 67,502 Wetland Mitigation Fees - 36,600 34,372 - - 70,972 Interest and Investment Income 195,000 - 195,000 221,175 - 221,175 Fees in Lieu of Improvements - 100,000 25,634 - 100,000 25,634 Operating Transfers-In 416,200 - 416,200 398,528 - 398,528 Total 1,612,400$ 4,461,406$ 9,032,775$ 1,789,285$ 968,304$ 12,702,762$ Beginning Fund Balance, January 2019 11,881,781$ Net Change in Fund Balance, September 2019 820,981 Ending Fund Balance, September 2019 12,702,762$ 2019 Budgeted Ending Fund Balance 9,032,775$ YTD ACTUALSBUDGET Revenues ExpendituresRevenuesExpenditures 31 Page 159 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 32 Enterprise Funds Detailed income and expense statements for Enterprise and Internal Service funds can be found in an attachment at the end of this report. The attachment provides operating and – as applicable – capital fund reports for these funds showing budget, actuals, and variances. Operating funds house all the operating costs along with debt service and financing obligations. Capital funds show costs associated with capital acquisition and construction. Both the operating and capital funds have a working capital balance. This approach isolates those funds available for capital and cash flow needs for daily operations, and project managers will know exactly how much working capital is available for current and planned projects. Through Q3-2019 the Water Utility had operating income of $5.2 million as compared to $4.4 million through Q3-2018. Total Water Fund operating revenues were $903,000 higher than through Q3-2018, mainly due to strong performance in water sales – particularly the commercial and irrigation categories. Water sales revenue is directly impacted by rate changes, which were implemented across all water consumption categories effective January 1, 2019. Operating expenditures through Q3-2019 were up $126,000, or 1.9% from Q3-2018. This variance is mainly due to increases in personnel costs and to increased interfund utility taxes associated with higher revenues. Water sales by volume through September 2019 totaled 2.4 million hundred cubic feet (ccf) as compared to 2.3 million ccf through September 2018, an increase of 5.0%. Total consumption was up across all customer categories except school and wholesale. Significant increases by volume were seen in commercial, irrigation and multifamily usage. While overall consumption has increased compared to the same period last year, the Water Utility has seen a general trend of decreased year-over-year consumption on a per account basis due largely to conservation efforts and appliance efficiency improvements. 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 1,000,000 $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 $1,800 $2,000 CCFThousandsWater Revenues vs Water Sold 2019 vs 2018 2018 Water Sales ($) 2019 Water Sales ($) 2018 Water Sold (ccf) 2019 Water Sold (ccf) 32 Page 160 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 33 The Sewer Utility finished Q3-2019 with operating income of $2.2 million as compared to $1.5 million through Q3-2018. Increased revenues from charges for City sewer service following the rate adjustment in January 2019 account for about half of the favorable variance; the remainder consists mainly of a one-time $203,000 refund from the Department of Revenue for overpayment of excise tax as well as interest earnings that already significantly exceed budget projections. Year-to-date operating expenditures in the Sewer Utility were slightly below Q3-2018, with spending at similar levels to last year in each category. Through Q3-2019, the Stormwater Utility had operating income of $2.3 million compared with $2.0 million through Q3-2018. Operating revenues are up $235,000 compared to Q3-2018 due to charges for City storm service, which saw increases to all non-single family variable rates, as well as from strong investment income performance. Operating expenditures in the Stormwater Utility were down $56,000 from Q3-2018, contributing to the higher operating income noted above. Factors contributing to this include a decrease in spending on repairs and maintenance and the timing of certain intergovernmental payments. Through Q3-2019 the Solid Waste Utility Fund had $11.9 million in operating revenues, compared to $11.6 million in operating expenditures. The City of Auburn’s Solid Waste services are outsourced to Waste Management and to Republic Services, who manages the contract for the annexed areas. As of September 2019, Waste Management serviced 15,511 customers (79% of customers) and Republic Services serviced 4,155 customers (21% of customers). The current mix of solid waste customer account types is:  89.7% Residential  7.8% Commercial  2.5% Multifamily The “diversion rate” is a measure of how much generated waste is not sent to the landfill; i.e., waste that is either recycled or collected yard waste. Through Q3-2019, the total diversion rate was 28.6%, which represents a total of 14,825 tons of waste that was diverted from landfills. 33 Page 161 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 34 2019 Tons Collected and Diversion Rates: Of the total tonnage collected through Q3-2019, 33% was collected from residential customers, 14% from multifamily customers, and 53% from commercial customers, as shown in the following graph. 6,016 4,562 5,433 6,489 6,482 5,666 6,043 5,693 5,539 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19 Aug-19 Sep-19 Oct-19 Nov-19 Dec-19TonnageSolid Waste Tonnage by Customer Type Residential Multifamily Commercial 34 Page 162 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 35 In January 2019, the Auburn Municipal Airport transitioned from contracted management services through a third-party management company to management of the Airport by in-house (City) staff. The Airport Fund finished Q3-2019 with operating income of $331,000 as compared with operating income of $263,000 through Q3-2018. Operating revenues in the Airport Fund are up $363,000 over Q3-2018, largely due to sales of aviation fuel. Aviation fuel was previously sold by AMG, with a portion of the profit remitted to the City. Currently the City sells fuel directly, and recovers all associated revenue. Operating expenditures in the Airport Fund through Q3-2019 have increased by $295,000 over the same period last year. A significant portion of this increase is due to the purchase of aviation fuel for resale; the remaining variance consists largely of interfund charges related to City internal services, repairs and maintenance, public utility costs, and interfund transfers to fund one-time technology and vehicle purchases associated with bringing the management of the facilities in- house. Through Q3-2019, the Cemetery Fund experienced operating income of $146,000 as compared with an operating income of $174,000 through Q3-2018. While sales of lots have decreased from 2018, this is generally offset by increases in openings/closings and sales of liners and markers. Overall, operating revenues are up by $32,000, or 3.0% while operating expenditures are up $60,000 or 6.7% from the same period last year due to inventory purchases and citywide internal service allocations. $0 $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 $1,200 $1,400 $1,600 ThousandsCEMETERY 2019 Budgeted Revenue 2019 YTD Actual Revenue 2018 Actual Revenue 2019 YTD Actual Expenses Cumulative Revenues & Expenditures 2019 Budget vs. Actual 35 Page 163 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 36 Internal Service Funds Operating expenditures within the Insurance Fund represent the premium cost pool that will be allocated monthly to other City funds over the course of 2019. As a result, the expenditure balance gradually diminishes each month throughout the year. No significant variances are reported in the Workers’ Compensation, Facilities, Innovation & Technology, or Equipment Rental Funds. Investment Portfolio The City’s total cash and investments at the end of the Q3-2019 totaled $148.9 million, and compares to $147.8 million at the end of Q2-2019. [attachment] P-Card Statistics The City has been actively promoting the use of P-Cards in lieu of purchase orders to minimize effort and maximize incentive payments from the vendor and the State. In Q3-2019, 3,905 P-Card transactions were processed as compared with 1,090 purchase order transactions. Total incentive payments received from US Bank in Q3-2019 totaled $26,734. These are estimated payments since quarterly rebate checks are not actually received until the next quarter. There is also an annual incentive payment from the State that is received in the year following. The annual State incentive payment for 2018 was $27,723 and was received in April of 2019. 921 3,924 1,090 3,905 - 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 Purchase Order Transactions PCard Transactions PCard Incentives Received (see text)TransactionsPurchase Order and PCard Transactions 2018 and 2019 Q3 $23,975 $26,734 3,129 12,318 $95,795 3,305 12,038 $103,450 - 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Purchase Order Transactions PCard Transactions PCard Incentives Received (see text)Transactions2018 and 2019 YTD 2018 2019 36 Page 164 of 275 Quarterly Financial Report Through Q3-2019 37 Contact Information This report is prepared by the Finance Department. Additional financial information can also be viewed at our website: http://www.auburnwa.gov/. For any questions about this report please contact Jamie Thomas at jdthomas@auburnwa.gov. 37 Page 165 of 275 Investment Purchase Book Maturity Yield to Type Date Value Date Maturity State Investment Pool Various 97,233,193$ Various 2.20% KeyBank Money Market Various 4,485,883 Various 0.15% OpusBank Public Interest Acct Various 10,410,429 Various 2.28% FHLB 2/28/2018 2,001,840 2/28/2023 2.65% FFCB 5/21/2018 1,997,160 10/21/2019 2.48% FAMCA 6/27/2018 1,999,940 7/16/2020 2.50% FFCB 7/16/2018 2,000,620 7/16/2020 2.60% TX ST-BABs-A 8/8/2018 1,761,620 4/1/2020 2.68% FFCB 8/27/2018 2,004,660 2/23/2021 2.70% RFCSP 10/5/2018 5,032,674 10/15/2019 2.69% RFCSP 12/14/2018 5,012,903 7/15/2020 2.73% RFCSP 2/19/2019 4,999,824 1/15/2021 2.52% RFCSP 5/9/2019 4,999,802 10/15/2020 2.23% STRIPS 7/26/2019 4,999,777 11/15/2020 1.83% Total Cash & Investments 148,940,325$ 2.206% Investment Mix % of Total State Investment Pool 65.3%Current 6-month treasury rate 1.89% KeyBank Money Market 3.0%Current State Pool rate 2.20% OpusBank Public Interest Acct 7.0%KeyBank Money Market 0.15% FHLB 1.3%OpusBank Public Interest Acct 2.28% FFCB 4.0%Blended Auburn rate 2.21% FAMCA 1.3% TX ST-BABs-A 1.2% RFCSP 13.5% STRIPS 3.4% 100.0% City of Auburn Investment Portfolio Summary September 30, 2019 Summary 38 Page 166 of 275 SALES TAX SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2019 SALES TAX DISTRIBUTIONS (FOR JULY 2019 RETAIL ACTIVITY) 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD NAICS CONSTRUCTION (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff NAICS AUTOMOTIVE (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 236 Construction of Buildings 1,257,918 993,660 799,302 -19.6%441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealer 3,843,704 2,883,183 2,840,445 -1.5% 237 Heavy and Civil Construction 170,543 117,481 98,473 -16.2%447 Gasoline Stations 278,087 209,029 196,657 -5.9% 238 Specialty Trade Contractors 881,157 652,299 608,960 -6.6%TOTAL AUTOMOTIVE 4,121,791$ 3,092,212$ 3,037,102$ -1.8% TOTAL CONSTRUCTION 2,309,617$ 1,763,440$ 1,506,735$ -14.6%Overall Change from Previous Year (55,110)$ Overall Change from Previous Year (256,705)$ 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD NAICS RETAIL TRADE (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff NAICS MANUFACTURING (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 442 Furniture and Home Furnishings 209,879 152,512 160,025 4.9% 311 Food Manufacturing 7,745 5,419 6,802 25.5%443 Electronics and Appliances 229,028 170,495 204,900 20.2% 312 Beverage and Tobacco Products 12,379 9,021 8,929 -1.0%444 Building Material and Garden 576,468 427,143 486,621 13.9% 313 Textile Mills 559 394 180 -54.2%445 Food and Beverage Stores 387,928 285,107 303,970 6.6% 314 Textile Product Mills 1,860 1,243 2,023 62.8%446 Health and Personal Care Store 420,087 312,578 329,890 5.5% 315 Apparel Manufacturing 347 213 537 152.4%448 Clothing and Accessories 1,170,083 863,543 901,139 4.4% 316 Leather and Allied Products 221 136 267 96.4%451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Books 220,869 160,584 185,343 15.4% 321 Wood Product Manufacturing 16,224 10,250 10,227 -0.2%452 General Merchandise Stores 870,096 678,091 620,494 -8.5% 322 Paper Manufacturing 12,982 6,856 8,867 29.3%453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers 689,386 498,062 676,134 35.8% 323 Printing and Related Support 46,020 36,400 33,825 -7.1%454 Nonstore Retailers 267,088 208,455 174,803 -16.1% 324 Petroleum and Coal Products 9,780 7,682 6,195 -19.4%TOTAL RETAIL TRADE 5,040,912$ 3,756,570$ 4,043,320$ 7.6% 325 Chemical Manufacturing 12,512 9,407 9,857 4.8%Overall Change from Previous Year 286,750$ 326 Plastics and Rubber Products 8,844 7,269 5,819 -19.9% 327 Nonmetallic Mineral Products 21,776 14,703 15,128 2.9% 331 Primary Metal Manufacturing 4,065 950 31,445 3208.5%2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD 332 Fabricated Metal Product Manuf 26,115 19,717 24,399 23.7%NAICS SERVICES (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 333 Machinery Manufacturing 24,283 19,631 17,475 -11.0%51*Information 637,625 487,341 505,756 a 3.8% 334 Computer and Electronic Product 7,184 4,858 5,565 14.5%52*Finance and Insurance 140,135 105,510 104,707 -0.8% 335 Electric Equipment, Appliances 791 395 174 -55.8%53*Real Estate, Rental, Leasing 367,824 271,291 321,782 18.6% 336 Transportation Equipment Man 488,093 363,573 356,059 -2.1%541 Professional, Scientific, Tech 253,684 190,908 248,422 30.1% 337 Furniture and Related Products 19,899 13,802 16,159 17.1%551 Company Management 16 9 1,138 12877.0% 339 Miscellaneous Manufacturing 32,607 24,097 29,819 23.7%56*Admin. Supp., Remed Svcs 423,760 303,074 389,522 28.5% TOTAL MANUFACTURING 754,285$ 556,018$ 589,753$ 6.1%611 Educational Services 47,224 32,771 31,727 -3.2% Overall Change from Previous Year 33,735$ 62*Health Care Social Assistance 93,420 62,303 72,041 15.6% 71*Arts and Entertainment 119,180 89,259 85,220 -4.5% 72*Accommodation and Food Svcs 1,435,327 1,062,325 1,087,824 2.4% 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD 81*Other Services 560,054 409,512 456,165 11.4% NAICS TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 92*Public Administration 150,574 117,127 1,269 -98.9% 481 Air Transportation 3 3 0 -100.0%TOTAL SERVICES 4,228,822$ 3,131,431$ 3,305,574$ 5.6% 482 Rail Transportation 25,453 17,032 16,496 -3.2%Overall Change from Previous Year 174,143$ 484 Truck Transportation 26,564 23,737 11,049 -53.5% 485 Transit and Ground Passengers 56 44 27 -38.9% 488 Transportation Support 52,211 39,291 28,328 -27.9%2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD 491 Postal Service 1,007 833 541 -35.1%NAICS MISCELLANEOUS (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 492 Couriers and Messengers 1,359 1,233 218 -82.3%000 Unknown 0 0 0 N/A 493 Warehousing and Storage 13,554 10,513 7,288 -30.7%111-115 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing 3,656 2,848 3,719 30.6% TOTAL TRANSPORTATION 120,208$ 92,685$ 63,946$ -31.0%211-221 Mining & Utilities 26,370 19,400 21,471 10.7% Overall Change from Previous Year (28,739)$ 999 Unclassifiable Establishments 123,605 73,541 167,494 127.8% TOTAL SERVICES 153,632$ 95,789$ 192,684$ 101.2% Overall Change from Previous Year 96,895$ 2018 Annual Total 2018 YTD 2019 YTD YTD NAICS WHOLESALE TRADE (Nov '17-Oct '18)(Nov '17-Jul '18)(Nov '18-Jul '19)% Diff 423 Wholesale Trade, Durable Goods 1,147,872 864,620 897,370 b 3.8%GRAND TOTAL 18,198,285$ 13,588,552$ 13,872,916$ 424 Wholesale Trade, Nondurable 315,956 232,167 229,311 -1.2%Overall Change from Previous Year 284,365$ 2.1% 425 Wholesale Electronic Markets 5,189 3,620 7,120 96.7% TOTAL WHOLESALE 1,469,017$ 1,100,407$ 1,133,801$ 3.0%Total September 2019 Sales Tax Distributions 1,604,250$ Overall Change from Previous Year 33,395$ Dollar Increase from September 2018 84,370$ Percent Increase from September 2018 Comparisons: Includes Adjustments in excess of +/- $10,000.September 2018 13,588,552 12,068,672 1,519,880$ a. WA State Department of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for February 2019 Reporting (adjustment: $14,165).September 2017 12,898,928 11,454,688 1,444,240$ b. WA State Department of Revenue audit adjustment to sales tax returns for August 2019 Reporting (adjustment: $10,411). 09/24/19 Prepared by Auburn Finance Department 5.6% 39 Page 167 of 275 Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance OPERATING FUND:460 460 461 461 462 462 OPERATING REVENUES Charges For Service 15,471,500 11,698,945 (3,772,555) 9,014,200 6,700,046 (2,314,154) 18,370,000 13,584,042 (4,785,958) 10,085,900 7,547,429 (2,538,471) Grants - - - - - - Interest Earnings 20,000 176,939 156,939 20,000 107,968 87,968 2,500 19,293 16,793 15,000 104,068 89,068 Rents, Leases, Concessions, & Other 187,000 129,460 (57,540) 70,000 239,151 169,151 - - - 56,000 42,908 (13,092) TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 15,678,500 12,005,344 (3,673,156) 9,104,200 7,047,165 (2,057,035) 18,372,500 13,603,336 (4,769,164) 10,156,900 7,694,405 (2,462,495) OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries & Wages 2,472,136 1,778,807 693,329 1,478,205 1,049,666 428,539 - - - 2,511,990 1,767,469 744,521 Benefits 1,335,528 908,898 426,630 783,349 537,595 245,754 - - - 1,329,580 887,397 442,183 Supplies 364,244 221,806 142,438 136,550 64,501 72,049 - - - 84,550 71,585 12,965 Other Service Charges 4,455,849 2,219,726 2,236,123 2,912,150 1,965,221 946,929 18,215,600 13,387,096 4,828,504 1,994,100 1,167,618 826,482 Intergovernmental Services (Less Transfers Out)- - - - - - Waste Management Payments See Note Sewer Metro Services - - - Debt Service Interest 1,092,600 376,984 715,616 245,500 131,058 114,442 - - - 311,100 169,233 141,867 Interfund Operating Rentals & Supplies 1,773,617 1,346,847 426,770 1,391,917 1,059,921 331,997 - - - 1,818,400 1,374,827 443,573 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 11,493,974 6,853,068 4,640,906 6,947,671 4,807,963 2,139,708 18,215,600 13,387,096 4,828,504 8,049,720 5,438,129 2,611,591 OPERATING REVENUES LESS EXPENSES BEFORE DEPRECIATION 4,184,526 5,152,276 967,750 2,156,529 2,239,202 82,673 156,900 216,239 59,339 2,107,180 2,256,276 149,096 NON-OPERATING REVENUES Operating Transfers-in - - - Intergovernmental Loan 3,135,100 39,258 3,095,842 Other Non-Operating Revenues - NON-OPERATING EXPENSES Transfer to Capital Subfund 3,135,100 39,258 3,095,842 - - - - - - Other Operating Transfers-out 381,491 27,296 354,195 328,692 9,676 319,016 404,392 83,676 320,716 Debt Service Principal 1,775,400 650,014 1,125,386 563,400 288,262 275,138 438,000 - 438,000 Net Change in Restricted Net Assets - 67,435 67,435 - (14,769) (14,769) - 21,527 21,527 Interfund Loan Repayment BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 7,685,258 7,685,258 - 5,187,057 5,187,057 - 3,567,929 3,567,929 - 4,754,678 4,754,678 - ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 9,712,893 12,092,789 2,379,896 6,451,494 7,143,090 691,596 3,724,829 3,784,168 59,339 6,019,466 6,905,751 886,285 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note)2,027,635 4,407,531 2,379,896 1,264,437 1,956,033 691,596 156,900 216,239 59,339 1,264,788 2,151,073 886,285 CAPITAL FUND: CAPITAL REVENUES Interest Revenue 10,000 27,420 17,420 80,000 187,447 107,447 80,000 127,249 47,249 Grants 350,592 341,129 (9,463) 181,965 5,792 (176,173) Contributions - - - - - - - Other Non-Operating Revenue - 10,340 10,340 - - - - - - Increase In Contributions - System Development 937,700 416,463 (521,237) 654,700 616,101 (38,599) 489,900 334,309 (155,591) Interfund Revenues - - - - - - - - - Increase In Contributions - FAA - - - - - - - - - Proceeds of Debt Activity 7,178,324 - (7,178,324) - - - - - - Transfers In from Operating Sub-Fund 3,135,100 39,258 (3,095,842) - - - - - - Transfer In from Other Funds - - - - - - - - TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUES 11,611,716 834,610 (10,777,106) 734,700 803,548 68,848 751,865 467,350 (284,515) CAPITAL EXPENSES Other Non-Operating Expense - - - - - - - - - Increase In Fixed Assets - Salaries 424,300 174,077 250,223 182,900 51,963 130,938 202,900 50,399 152,501 Increase In Fixed Assets - Benefits 169,700 84,240 85,460 73,100 24,796 48,304 81,100 23,540 57,560 Increase In Fixed Assets - Services 300 140 160 1,900 616 1,284 1,900 427 1,473 Increase In Fixed Assets - Site Improvements - 12,419 (12,419) - - - - - Increase In Fixed Assets - Equipment - - - 28,000 - 28,000 - - - Increase In Fixed Assets - Construction 10,666,543 1,427,837 9,238,706 3,617,608 184,037 3,433,571 3,507,258 182,927 3,324,331 Operating Transfers Out 76,400 66,122 10,278 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 - TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES 11,337,243 1,764,835 9,572,408 3,953,508 311,412 3,642,096 3,843,158 307,293 3,535,865 BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 1,968,494 1,968,494 - 12,489,613 12,489,613 - 12,397,826 12,397,826 - 2,242,967 1,038,269 (1,204,698) 9,270,805 12,981,749 3,710,944 9,306,533 12,557,883 3,251,350 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note)274,473 (930,225) (1,204,698) (3,218,808) 492,136 3,710,944 (3,091,293) 160,057 3,251,350 Total Change in Working Capital 2,302,108 3,477,305 1,175,197 (1,954,371) 2,448,169 4,402,540 156,900 216,239 59,339 (1,826,505) 2,311,130 4,137,635 (*) Depreciation 3,612,800 2,901,840 2,333,400 1,707,785 - - 2,184,100 1,571,160 OPERATING & CAPITAL FUNDS WATER ENTERPRISE FUNDS SEWER SEWER METRO STORMCash Basis through September 2019 (*) Debt service interest as shown represents actual cash outlay. Debt service principal represents actual expenditures; payments will be made as scheduled in December 2019. Working Capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 40 Page 168 of 275 OPERATING FUND: OPERATING REVENUES Charges For Service Grants Interest Earnings Rents, Leases, Concessions, & Other TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries & Wages Benefits Supplies Other Service Charges Intergovernmental Services (Less Transfers Out) Waste Management Payments See Note Sewer Metro Services Debt Service Interest Interfund Operating Rentals & Supplies TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING REVENUES LESS EXPENSES BEFORE DEPRECIATION NON-OPERATING REVENUES Operating Transfers-in Intergovernmental Loan Other Non-Operating Revenues NON-OPERATING EXPENSES Transfer to Capital Subfund Other Operating Transfers-out Debt Service Principal Net Change in Restricted Net Assets Interfund Loan Repayment BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note) CAPITAL FUND: CAPITAL REVENUES Interest Revenue Grants Contributions Other Non-Operating Revenue Increase In Contributions - System Development Interfund Revenues Increase In Contributions - FAA Proceeds of Debt Activity Transfers In from Operating Sub-Fund Transfer In from Other Funds TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUES CAPITAL EXPENSES Other Non-Operating Expense Increase In Fixed Assets - Salaries Increase In Fixed Assets - Benefits Increase In Fixed Assets - Services Increase In Fixed Assets - Site Improvements Increase In Fixed Assets - Equipment Increase In Fixed Assets - Construction Operating Transfers Out TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note) Total Change in Working Capital (*) Depreciation OPERATING & CAPITAL FUNDS Cash Basis through September 2019 Working Capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance 464 464 465 465 466 466 - 16,071,700 11,808,013 (4,263,687) 1,285,700 1,055,242 (230,458) 1,086,000 1,088,647 2,647 - - - 88,600 13,925 (74,675) - 2,000 2,000 - - 88,800 84,879 (3,921) 6,900 18,737 11,837 1,000 14,788 13,788 21,000 21,368 368 - 4,202 4,202 6,000 5,873 (127) - 214 214 16,249,100 11,911,019 (4,338,081) 1,298,600 1,081,852 (216,748) 1,087,000 1,103,648 16,648 21,000 21,368 368 - 761 (761) 207,803 157,797 50,006 464,932 349,219 115,713 - - - - 69 (69) 149,990 93,743 56,247 269,930 193,344 76,586 175,000 31,580 143,420 53,400 3,143 50,257 292,700 293,913 (1,213) 221,700 186,705 34,995 - - - 2,123,775 1,335,293 788,482 247,400 174,460 72,940 151,500 111,151 40,349 5,600 299,201 (293,601) - - - - - - - - - - - - 13,485,300 9,794,313 3,690,987 - - - 3,700 2,258 1,442 - - - - - - 612,000 478,664 133,336 38,600 28,950 9,650 155,900 117,390 38,510 - - - 16,274,475 11,612,244 4,662,231 940,193 751,119 189,074 1,263,962 957,808 306,154 180,600 330,781 (150,181) (25,375) 298,775 324,150 358,407 330,733 (27,674) (176,962) 145,840 322,802 (159,600) (309,413) (149,813) 100,000 - (100,000) - - - 350,000 83,179 100,000 - 21,831 8,082 13,749 10,000 4,236 5,764 - - - 186,500 - 186,500 - - - - (1,766) (1,766) - - - 42,100 31,175 10,925 5,647,783 5,647,783 - 590,315 590,315 - 702,687 702,687 - 1,932,526 1,932,526 - 5,600,577 5,938,475 337,898 360,122 804,223 444,101 525,725 848,527 322,802 1,772,926 1,623,113 (149,813) (47,206) 290,692 337,898 (230,193) 213,908 444,101 (176,962) 145,840 322,802 (159,600) (309,413) (149,813) 2,000 1,464 (536) - 4,531 4,531 104,316 12,610 (91,706) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,367,730 193,882 (2,173,848) - - - - - - - - - 350,000 83,179 (266,821) 100,000 - (100,000) - - - 55,442 - (55,442) 2,824,046 291,136 (2,532,910) 155,442 4,531 (150,911) - - - - - - 4,300 57 4,243 - - - 1,700 41 1,659 - - - 100 8 92 100 19 81 - - - - - - - - 2,928,308 322,463 2,605,845 380,442 - 380,442 73,200 69,034 4,166 - - - 3,007,608 391,603 2,616,005 380,542 19 380,523 211,881 211,881 - 253,352 253,352 - 28,319 111,413 83,094 28,252 257,864 229,612 (183,562) (100,468) 83,094 (225,100) 4,512 229,612 (47,206) 290,692 (413,755) 113,440 527,195 (402,062) 150,352 552,414 (159,600) (309,413) (149,813) 19,900 14,114 490,300 318,706 45,000 24,826 - - Note: Includes September's Waste Management payment ($1,129,012), which will be made in October. INSURANCE (*) Debt service interest as shown represents actual cash outlay. Debt service principal represents actual expenditures; payments will be made as scheduled in December 2019. ENTERPRISE FUNDS SOLID WASTE AIRPORT CEMETERY INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS see Note 41 Page 169 of 275 OPERATING FUND: OPERATING REVENUES Charges For Service Grants Interest Earnings Rents, Leases, Concessions, & Other TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES OPERATING EXPENSES Salaries & Wages Benefits Supplies Other Service Charges Intergovernmental Services (Less Transfers Out) Waste Management Payments See Note Sewer Metro Services Debt Service Interest Interfund Operating Rentals & Supplies TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES OPERATING REVENUES LESS EXPENSES BEFORE DEPRECIATION NON-OPERATING REVENUES Operating Transfers-in Intergovernmental Loan Other Non-Operating Revenues NON-OPERATING EXPENSES Transfer to Capital Subfund Other Operating Transfers-out Debt Service Principal Net Change in Restricted Net Assets Interfund Loan Repayment BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note) CAPITAL FUND: CAPITAL REVENUES Interest Revenue Grants Contributions Other Non-Operating Revenue Increase In Contributions - System Development Interfund Revenues Increase In Contributions - FAA Proceeds of Debt Activity Transfers In from Operating Sub-Fund Transfer In from Other Funds TOTAL CAPITAL REVENUES CAPITAL EXPENSES Other Non-Operating Expense Increase In Fixed Assets - Salaries Increase In Fixed Assets - Benefits Increase In Fixed Assets - Services Increase In Fixed Assets - Site Improvements Increase In Fixed Assets - Equipment Increase In Fixed Assets - Construction Operating Transfers Out TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENSES BEGINNING WORKING CAPITAL - January 1, 2019 NET CHANGE IN WORKING CAPITAL (see Note) Total Change in Working Capital (*) Depreciation OPERATING & CAPITAL FUNDS Cash Basis through September 2019 Working Capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities ENDING WORKING CAPITAL - September 30, 2019 Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance Budget YTD Actual Variance - - 568 568 560 560 1,075,200 814,057 (261,143) 3,436,500 2,609,132 (827,368) 6,276,600 4,714,752 (1,561,848) 2,007,606 1,505,705 (501,901) - - - - - - 46,000 42,516 (3,484) 24,600 34,987 10,387 8,000 49,573 41,573 - 56,416 56,416 50,000 4,777 (45,223) - - - - - - - 153,267 153,267 1,171,200 861,350 (309,850) 3,461,100 2,644,118 (816,982) 6,284,600 4,764,325 (1,520,275) 2,007,606 1,715,388 (292,218) - - - 728,510 504,504 224,006 2,070,555 1,503,359 567,196 604,034 450,353 153,681 250,000 108,949 141,051 424,233 294,895 129,338 1,072,035 730,879 341,156 324,807 225,067 99,740 - - - 144,720 78,236 66,484 469,150 251,011 218,139 1,092,000 723,752 368,248 448,315 203,520 244,795 1,995,950 1,194,440 801,510 2,861,600 2,216,311 645,289 493,050 287,687 205,363 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2,700 1,222 1,478 119,800 93,793 26,007 159,700 119,775 39,925 183,000 137,250 45,750 291,600 219,626 71,974 818,115 406,262 411,853 3,453,113 2,191,850 1,261,263 6,656,340 4,838,809 1,817,531 2,808,191 1,907,706 900,485 353,085 455,088 102,003 7,987 452,269 444,282 (371,740) (74,484) 297,256 (800,585) (192,319) 608,266 44,500 40,000 (4,500) 276,210 54,582 (221,628) - - - 733,950 321,688 412,262 30,000 17,000 13,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - (57,631) (57,631) 1,165,108 1,165,108 - 1,767,017 1,767,017 - 2,613,666 2,613,666 - 3,361,101 3,361,101 - 1,518,193 1,620,196 102,003 1,085,554 1,937,598 852,044 2,488,136 2,576,764 88,628 2,560,516 3,226,413 665,897 353,085 455,088 102,003 (681,463) 170,581 852,044 (125,530) (36,902) 88,628 (800,585) (134,688) 665,897 - 26,717 26,717 - 75,723 75,723 60,000 60,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,771,194 1,328,396 (442,798) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34,700 - (34,700) 1,048,000 139,434 (908,566) 34,700 26,717 (7,983) 2,879,194 1,603,552 (1,275,642) - - - - - - - 4,357 (4,357) - - - - 2,277 (2,277) - - - 300 116 184 500 314 186 - - 883,700 76,777 806,923 2,489,450 981,495 1,507,955 20,000 13,255 6,745 1,140,000 - 1,140,000 - - - - - - 904,000 96,782 807,218 3,629,950 981,809 2,648,141 1,526,533 1,526,533 - 3,770,132 3,770,132 - 657,233 1,456,468 799,235 3,019,376 4,391,875 1,372,499 (869,300) (70,065) 799,235 (750,756) 621,743 1,372,499 353,085 455,088 102,003 (681,463) 170,581 852,044 (994,830) (106,967) 887,863 (1,551,341) 487,055 2,038,396 - - - - 500,000 230,191 1,250,000 968,604 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS WORKER'S COMPENSATION FACILITIES INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT RENTAL 42 Page 170 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6751 (Thomas)(15 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Finance Attachments: Ord 6751 BA#5 Trans mittal Memo Ord 6751 BA#5 Ord 6751 Sched A Ord 6751 Sched B Ord 6751 Attachment Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6751. Background Summary: Budget Amendment #5 represents the fifth budget amendment for the 2019-2020 biennium and the first budget amendment for 2020. For details, see the attached transmittal memorandum and supporting materials. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Thomas Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 171 of 275 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Jamie Thomas, Finance Director CC: Nancy Backus, Mayor Date: November 5, 2019 Re: Ordinance #6751 – 2019-2020 Budget Amendment #5 The City’s biennial 2019-2020 budget was approved by Council as two one-year appropriations. Budget Amendments #1, #2, and #3 amended the budget for calendar year 2019. Budget Amendment #4, which will also amend the 2019 budget, will be brought to Council for consideration on November 25, 2019. This amendment will be the fifth budget amendment for the biennium and the first budget amendment for calendar year 2020. The purpose of this amendment is to 1) realign significant revenue sources; 2) adopt the continuation of previously approved requests by council; 3) adjust capital project budgets to match the 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP); 4) add budget authority for new programs and other expected changes in 2020; and 5) adjust projected 2020 beginning fund balance. Realign Significant Revenue Sources. With new legislation and policies adopted throughout 2019, and three quarters of revenue collection data for 2019, there is an opportunity to fine-tune revenue projections for 2020. Total general fund revenue adjustment increases totaled $1,425,000 and include:  Property tax to reflect actual levy amount ($100,000)  Business license fees to reflect increases ($200,000)  Streamlined sales tax mitigation increase due to legislative extension through 2021 ($925,000)  Certain developer fees and permits due to fee schedule increases ($200,000) Adopt the continuation of previously approved requests by Council. Amend the 2020 budget for changes adopted in 2019 for which there is an ongoing fiscal impact in 2020 . Items in this category were previously approved by Council in 2019. In total, these items decreases budgeted 2020 ending fund balance by a net of $7,900, and include:  Ongoing costs associated with the continuation of two new school resource officers, authorized in 2018 and 2019 budget amendments (net fund balance decrease of $39,300);  Impacts of the Police collective bargaining agreement, which was negotiated in 2019 (net fund balance decrease $790,300);  Adjust SCORE owner agency cost based on adopted SCORE budget (fund balance increase $400,000); and  Reduction of LEOFF1 benefit costs to better reflect historical actuals (fund balance increase $421,700). Page 172 of 275 Adjust capital project budgets. Represent changes to project budgets to align with the updated 2020-2025 Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) that is scheduled to be adopted in December, excluding unspent capital project budgets from 2019 that are automatically carried forward into 2020 due to the adoption of multi-year capital budgeting, as authorized in Ordinance No. 6682 (June 2018). Significant project adjustments included in this budget amendment include:  (Fund 102) Updated budget for F St. SE Non-Motorized Improvements project, funded by new federal grant and traffic impact fees ($3,250,000)  (Fund 102) Updated budget for Auburn Way South Improvements project, funded by new federal grant and traffic impact fees($1,500,000)  (Fund 460) Move budget from 2021 to 2020 to accelerate the Lea Hill AC Main replacement project, partially funded by bond proceeds ($2,778,000)  (Fund 460) Move budget from 2022 to 2020 to accelerate the Academy Pump Station pump replacement project, partially funded by bond proceeds ($2,196,000)  (Fund 465) Increase budget for Airport Runway project, largely funded by state and federal grants ($3,124,900)  Miscellaneous Project delays, deferrals, and deletions - see Attachment 1 ($1,512,900)  Reallocate funding for water utility system capital projects from working capital to bond funding - see Attachment 1 ($1,176,400) Add budget authority for new programs and other expected changes in 2020 .These include revenue adjustments to reflect new revenue sources revenue streams; requests for increased funding for existing programs, and funding requests for new projects or programs. New requests include:  Replace 24 golf carts, fully funded through equipment replacement ($103,800)  Marketing for Auburn Adventure Film Festival ($30,000)  Establish 2020 SKHPP budget, offset mostly through partnerships with other agencies (net $12,400) Adjustments of 2020 beginning fund balance due to 2019 budget amendments. Each approved budget amendment in 2019 (in BAs #1, #2, #3, and proposed BA#4) that amended the 2019 budgeted ending fund balance also affects the budgeted 2020 beginning fund balance. These adjustments, which affect most funds, increase 2020 budgeted fund balance by $9,012,155. The following table summarizes the current and revised budget as a result of this amendment. Table 1: 2020 Budget as Amended 2020 Adopted Budget $ 297,361,591 Budget Amendment #5 (Ord #6751) 31,783,475 2020 Budget as Amended $ 329,145,066 Attachments:  Ordinance # 6751  Schedule “A” – Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund  Schedule “B” – 2020 Appropriations by Fund  Attachment 1 – Summary of 2020 CIP Changes per 2020-2025 CFP Page 173 of 275 Ordinance No. 6751 November 20, 2019 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6751 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6693, THE 2019-2020 BIENNIAL BUDGET ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6712, ORDINANCE NO. 6719, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6720, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF AUBURN 2019-2020 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE “A” AND SCHEDULE “B” WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 3, 2018, adopted Ordinance No. 6693 which adopted the City of Auburn 2019 -2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of April 1, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6712 (BA#1) which amended Ordinance No. 6693 which adopted the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6719 (BA#2) which amended Ordinance No. 6712 which amended the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of July 15, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6720 (BA#3) which amended Ordinance No. 6719 which amended the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 2, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6752 (BA#4) which amended Ordinance No. 6720 which amended the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and Page 174 of 275 Ordinance No. 6751 November 20, 2019 Page 2 of 3 WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional funds to the various funds of the 2020 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA#5); and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment of the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget. The 2019- 2020 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts shown on said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B”. A copy of said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B” is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection. Section 2. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence , paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person or circumstance, will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 3. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Page 175 of 275 Ordinance No. 6751 November 20, 2019 Page 3 of 3 Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 176 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance General Fund (#001) 2020 Adopted Budget 12,394,863 75,249,867 80,586,405 7,058,325 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):2,856,654 1,742,520 298,720 4,300,454 General Fund Revenues: Increase budgeted property tax receipts to better match long-term forecast - 100,000 - 100,000 Increase budgeted business license revenue due to rate increase - 200,000 - 200,000 Increase budget due to extension of streamlined sales tax mitigation (SST) pmts - 925,000 - 925,000 Incr budget for excavation and related permit revenues due to rate increase - 200,000 - 200,000 Community Development Department: 2020 budget for South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP)- 312,820 300,420 12,400 SCORE SCORE budget adjustment - - (400,000) 400,000 - Police Department: Continue 2nd SRO (authorized in 2018 BA#6), partly funded by Auburn School Dist.- - 123,600 (123,600) Continue 3rd SRO (authorized in 2019 BA#3), partly funded by Auburn School Dist.- 109,700 25,400 84,300 Reduce private security revenues and associated expenditures - (130,000) (130,000) - Increase Police salaries and benefits to reflect CBAs negotiated in 2019 - - 776,000 (776,000) Public Works Department: Increase overtime budget to respond to traffic signal emergencies - 25,000 25,000 - Non-Departmental: Reduce estimated LEOFF1 benefit expenditures to better reflect historical actuals - - (421,700) 421,700 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 2,856,654 - - 2,856,654 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 001 15,251,517 76,992,387 80,885,125 11,358,779 ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Page 1 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 177 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Arterial Street Fund (#102) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,344,477 3,694,600 3,995,900 1,043,177 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(165,419) 4,275,000 4,895,000 (785,419) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (165,419) - - (165,419) Update budget for Auburn Way South Improvements project for federal grant - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - Update budget for F St. SE Non-Motorized Improvements project for federal grant - 2,750,000 3,250,000 (500,000) Budget for Lea Hill Road Segment 1a project per TIP - 150,000 150,000 - Budget for Traffic Signal Replacement Program (from 2021 plus new funding)- - 150,000 (150,000) Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - (125,000) (155,000) 30,000 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 102 1,179,058 7,969,600 8,890,900 257,758 Local Street Fund (#103) 2020 Adopted Budget 956,880 1,902,000 1,916,300 942,580 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):249,701 - - 249,701 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 249,701 - - 249,701 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 103 1,206,581 1,902,000 1,916,300 1,192,281 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund (#104) 2020 Adopted Budget 102,121 164,000 170,310 95,811 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):47,454 5,000 35,000 17,454 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 47,454 - - 47,454 Increase marketing funds for the annual Auburn Adventure Film Festival - 5,000 35,000 (30,000) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 104 149,575 169,000 205,310 113,265 Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,369,417 3,832,640 3,967,840 1,234,217 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(536,021) - (182,000) (354,021) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (536,021) - - (536,021) Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - - (182,000) 182,000 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 105 833,396 3,832,640 3,785,840 880,196 Page 2 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 178 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117) 2020 Adopted Budget 233,460 152,000 310,956 74,504 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):71,297 - 14,300 56,997 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 71,297 - - 71,297 Increase salaries and benefits in the Drug Forfeiture Fund to reflect Police CBA - - 14,300 (14,300) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 117 304,757 152,000 325,256 131,501 Housing & Comm Develop Fund (#119) 2020 Adopted Budget 36,458 539,970 539,970 36,458 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):6,446 - - 6,446 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 6,446 - - 6,446 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 119 42,904 539,970 539,970 42,904 Recreation Trails Fund (#120) 2020 Adopted Budget 71,426 7,100 - 78,526 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,550 - - 1,550 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 1,550 - - 1,550 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 120 72,976 7,100 - 80,076 BIA Fund (#121) 2020 Adopted Budget 74,673 55,200 90,000 39,873 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):940 - - 940 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 940 - - 940 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 121 75,613 55,200 90,000 40,813 Page 3 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 179 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Cumulative Reserve Fund (#122) 2020 Adopted Budget 10,162,312 197,800 4,100,000 6,260,112 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):33,754 - - 33,754 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 33,754 - - 33,754 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 122 10,196,066 197,800 4,100,000 6,293,866 Mitigation Fees Fund (#124) 2020 Adopted Budget 9,101,987 1,306,700 741,600 9,667,087 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(69,211) - 1,751,250 (1,820,461) Update budget for F St. SE Non-Motorized Improvements project for federal grant - - 750,000 (750,000) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (69,211) - - (69,211) Update budget for Auburn Way South Improvements project for federal grant - - 851,250 (851,250) Budget for Lea Hill Road Segment 1a project per TIP - - 150,000 (150,000) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 124 9,032,776 1,306,700 2,492,850 7,846,626 Local Revitalization 2010 C&D Bond Fund (#231) 2020 Adopted Budget 11,896 575,100 574,600 12,396 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):3,436 - - 3,436 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 3,436 - - 3,436 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 231 15,332 575,100 574,600 15,832 LID Guarantee Fund (#249) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,648 40 - 1,688 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):15 - - 15 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 15 - - 15 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 249 1,663 40 - 1,703 Page 4 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 180 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A LID 350 Fund (#275) 2020 Adopted Budget 8,659 100 - 8,759 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(4,956) - - (4,956) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (4,956) - - (4,956) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 275 3,703 100 - 3,803 Golf/Cemetery 2016 Refunding Fund (#276) 2020 Adopted Budget - 376,000 376,000 - BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):19 - - 19 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 19 - - 19 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 276 19 376,000 376,000 19 Parks Construction Fund (#321) 2020 Adopted Budget 365,772 590,100 470,000 485,872 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):120,757 - - 120,757 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 120,757 - - 120,757 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 321 486,529 590,100 470,000 606,629 Capital Improvements Fund (#328) 2020 Adopted Budget 7,679,377 2,605,200 3,944,300 6,340,277 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):362,010 - - 362,010 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 362,010 - - 362,010 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 328 8,041,387 2,605,200 3,944,300 6,702,287 Page 5 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 181 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Water Fund (#430) 2020 Adopted Budget 5,131,610 16,323,800 14,408,831 7,046,579 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):4,581,283 3,726,400 9,607,400 (1,299,717) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 4,581,283 - - 4,581,283 Transfer to F460 to provide funding for accelerated projects - - 5,881,000 (5,881,000) Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - 3,726,400 3,726,400 - Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 430 9,712,893 20,050,200 24,016,231 5,746,862 Sewer Fund (#431) 2020 Adopted Budget 5,528,686 9,394,700 7,777,448 7,145,938 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):894,808 - - 894,808 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 894,808 - - 894,808 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 431 6,423,494 9,394,700 7,777,448 8,040,746 Storm Drainage Fund (#432) 2020 Adopted Budget 4,151,402 10,399,200 8,831,070 5,719,532 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):1,868,064 - - 1,868,064 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 1,868,064 - - 1,868,064 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 432 6,019,466 10,399,200 8,831,070 7,587,596 Sewer Metro Sub Fund (#433) 2020 Adopted Budget 3,341,367 18,549,300 18,397,800 3,492,867 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):383,462 - - 383,462 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 383,462 - - 383,462 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 433 3,724,829 18,549,300 18,397,800 3,876,329 Page 6 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 182 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Solid Waste Fund (#434) 2020 Adopted Budget 5,508,969 16,351,600 16,684,052 5,176,517 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):91,608 - - 91,608 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 91,608 - - 91,608 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 434 5,600,577 16,351,600 16,684,052 5,268,125 Airport Fund (#435) 2020 Adopted Budget 257,640 1,258,800 1,085,701 430,739 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):102,482 134,100 242,650 (6,068) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 102,482 - - 102,482 Budget for Airport pavement repair and maintenance for runway and taxiways - - 25,000 (25,000) Increase budget for Airport Runway project to include additional elements - - 80,400 (80,400) Change airport management from contract to in-house and other adjustments - 134,100 137,250 (3,150) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 435 360,122 1,392,900 1,328,351 424,671 Cemetery Fund (#436) 2020 Adopted Budget 264,098 1,187,000 1,343,743 107,355 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):261,627 - - 261,627 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 261,627 - - 261,627 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 436 525,725 1,187,000 1,343,743 368,982 Page 7 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 183 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Water Capital Fund (#460) 2020 Adopted Budget 2,562,724 2,070,200 4,282,305 350,619 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(319,757) 9,507,400 6,640,400 2,547,243 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (319,757) - - (319,757) Move budget from 2021 to 2020 for Lea Hill AC Main replacement (cp1929)- 3,013,000 2,778,000 235,000 Replace state grant with DWSRF loan to fund Lead Service Line Repl project - - - - 460.334.018 STATE GRANTS - MILITARY DEPT (100,000) 460.397.100 OPERATING TRANSFERS-IN 100,000 Funding for Comprehensive Plan planning and analysis (from 2021-2022 CFP)- 122,000 122,000 - Funding for F St SE Non-Motorized Improvements (from 2021 CFP)- 384,000 302,000 82,000 Funding for AWS - Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE (from 2021 CFP)- 66,000 66,000 - Move budget from 2022 to 2020 for Academy Pump Station replacement (cp1916)- 2,196,000 2,196,000 - Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - 3,726,400 1,176,400 2,550,000 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 460 2,242,967 11,577,600 10,922,705 2,897,862 Sewer Capital Fund (#461) 2020 Adopted Budget 9,049,491 750,500 1,265,000 8,534,991 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):249,314 - - 249,314 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 249,314 - - 249,314 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 461 9,298,805 750,500 1,265,000 8,784,305 Storm Drainage Capital Fund (#462) 2020 Adopted Budget 10,701,488 581,800 2,063,900 9,219,388 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(1,394,955) - (797,000) (597,955) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (1,394,955) - - (1,394,955) Budget to address open detention storage ponds at the Airport (from 2021 CFP)- - 276,000 (276,000) Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - - (1,073,000) 1,073,000 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 462 9,306,533 581,800 1,266,900 8,621,433 Page 8 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 184 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Airport Capital Fund (#465) 2020 Adopted Budget 99,605 775,700 778,000 97,305 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):33,414 2,995,000 3,047,000 (18,586) Adjustments to capital projects per 2020-2025 CFP - (50,200) (102,900) 52,700 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (71,286) - - (71,286) Increase budget for Airport Runway project to include additional elements 104,700 3,020,200 3,124,900 - Budget for Airport pavement repair and maintenance for runway and taxiways - 25,000 25,000 - Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 465 133,019 3,770,700 3,825,000 78,719 Cemetery Capital Fund (#466) 2020 Adopted Budget 35,937 - 25,100 10,837 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(7,685) - - (7,685) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (7,685) - - (7,685) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 466 28,252 - 25,100 3,152 Insurance Fund (#501) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,768,470 23,100 180,600 1,610,970 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):4,456 - - 4,456 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 4,456 - - 4,456 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 501 1,772,926 23,100 180,600 1,615,426 Workers' Comp Fund (#503) 2020 Adopted Budget 2,482,073 1,261,900 833,415 2,910,558 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(963,880) - - (963,880) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (963,880) - - (963,880) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 503 1,518,193 1,261,900 833,415 1,946,678 Page 9 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 185 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Facilities Fund (#505) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,050,811 4,034,500 4,115,862 969,449 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):34,743 (20,700) 95,000 (80,957) 2020 budget for South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP)- 12,000 - 12,000 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 34,743 - - 34,743 Change airport management from contract to in-house and other adjustments - (32,700) - (32,700) Restore funding for City Hall wet well pump and elevator upgrade projects - - 95,000 (95,000) Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 505 1,085,554 4,013,800 4,210,862 888,492 Innovation & Technology Fund (#518) 2020 Adopted Budget 2,564,974 6,724,153 7,182,511 2,106,616 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(76,838) 20,000 - (56,838) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (76,838) - - (76,838) 2020 budget for South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP)- 20,000 - 20,000 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 518 2,488,136 6,744,153 7,182,511 2,049,778 Equipment Rental Fund (#550) 2020 Adopted Budget 2,352,641 2,075,495 2,785,735 1,642,401 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):164,875 9,900 103,800 70,975 Continue 2nd SRO (authorized in 2018 BA#6), partly funded by Auburn School Dist.- 9,900 - 9,900 Funding to replace 24 golf carts (fully paid-in)- - 103,800 (103,800) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 164,875 - - 164,875 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 550 2,517,516 2,085,395 2,889,535 1,713,376 Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560) 2020 Adopted Budget 3,302,654 1,594,605 1,331,000 3,566,259 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):(283,278) 15,500 - (267,778) Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 (283,278) - - (283,278) Continue 2nd SRO (authorized in 2018 BA#6), partly funded by Auburn School Dist.- 15,500 - 15,500 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 560 3,019,376 1,610,105 1,331,000 3,298,481 Page 10 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 186 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A IT Capital Fund (#568) 2020 Adopted Budget 300,697 500,000 500,300 300,397 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):356,536 - - 356,536 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 356,536 - - 356,536 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 568 657,233 500,000 500,300 656,933 Fire Pension Fund (#611) 2020 Adopted Budget 2,111,149 125,100 222,320 2,013,929 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):22,922 - - 22,922 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 22,922 - - 22,922 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 611 2,134,071 125,100 222,320 2,036,851 SKHHP Fund (#654) 2020 Adopted Budget - - - - BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):78,250 256,500 312,820 21,930 2020 budget for South King Housing and Homelessness Partners (SKHHP)78,250 256,500 312,820 21,930 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 654 78,250 256,500 312,820 21,930 Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701) 2020 Adopted Budget 1,829,409 45,000 - 1,874,409 BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed):56,978 - - 56,978 Adjust beginning fund balance for budget amendments in 2019 56,978 - - 56,978 Revised 2020 Budget - Fund 701 1,886,387 45,000 - 1,931,387 Page 11 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 187 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2020 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #5 (Ordinance #6751) 2,184 Beg. Fund Balance 2020 Revenues 2020 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Grand Total - All Funds 2020 Adopted Budget 108,311,321 189,050,270 199,654,274 97,707,317 TOTAL BA#5 (Ordinance #6XXX, Proposed)9,116,855 22,666,620 26,064,340 5,719,135 Revised 2020 Budget 117,428,176 211,716,890 225,718,614 103,426,452 329,145,066 329,145,066 Page 12 of 12 11/21/2019 10:14 AMPage 188 of 275 Schedule B 2020 Appropriations by Fund Fund 2020 Adopted Budget BA#5 (Ord #6751) Revised Budget General Fund (#001)87,644,730 4,599,174 92,243,904 Arterial Street Fund (#102)5,039,077 4,109,581 9,148,658 Local Street Fund (#103)2,858,880 249,701 3,108,581 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund (#104)266,121 52,454 318,575 Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105)5,202,057 (536,021) 4,666,036 Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117)385,460 71,297 456,757 Housing & Comm Develop Fund (#119)576,428 6,446 582,874 Recreation Trails Fund (#120)78,526 1,550 80,076 BIA Fund (#121)129,873 940 130,813 Cumulative Reserve Fund (#122)10,360,112 33,754 10,393,866 Mitigation Fees Fund (#124)10,408,687 (69,211) 10,339,476 1998 GO Library Bond Fund (#229)- - - City Hall Annex 2010 A&B Bond Fund (#230)1,658,400 - 1,658,400 Local Revitalization 2010 C&D Bond Fund (#231)586,996 3,436 590,432 SCORE Debt Service Fund (#238)2,117,000 - 2,117,000 LID Guarantee Fund (#249)1,688 15 1,703 LID 350 Fund (#275)8,759 (4,956) 3,803 Golf/Cemetery 2016 Refunding Fund (#276)376,000 19 376,019 Parks Construction Fund (#321)955,872 120,757 1,076,629 Capital Improvements Fund (#328)10,284,577 362,010 10,646,587 Local Revitalization Fund (#330)- - - Water Fund (#430)21,455,410 8,307,683 29,763,093 Sewer Fund (#431)14,923,386 894,808 15,818,194 Storm Drainage Fund (#432)14,550,602 1,868,064 16,418,666 Sewer Metro Sub Fund (#433)21,890,667 383,462 22,274,129 Solid Waste Fund (#434)21,860,569 91,608 21,952,177 Airport Fund (#435)1,516,440 236,582 1,753,022 Cemetery Fund (#436)1,451,098 261,627 1,712,725 Water Capital Fund (#460)4,632,924 9,187,643 13,820,567 Sewer Capital Fund (#461)9,799,991 249,314 10,049,305 Storm Drainage Capital Fund (#462)11,283,288 (1,394,955) 9,888,333 Airport Capital Fund (#465)875,305 3,028,414 3,903,719 Cemetery Capital Fund (#466)35,937 (7,685) 28,252 Insurance Fund (#501)1,791,570 4,456 1,796,026 Workers' Comp Fund (#503)3,743,973 (963,880) 2,780,093 Facilities Fund (#505)5,085,311 14,043 5,099,354 Innovation & Technology Fund (#518)9,289,127 (56,838) 9,232,289 Equipment Rental Fund (#550)4,428,136 174,775 4,602,911 Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560)4,897,259 (267,778) 4,629,481 IT Capital Fund (#568)800,697 356,536 1,157,233 Fire Pension Fund (#611)2,236,249 22,922 2,259,171 SKHHP Fund (#654)- 334,750 334,750 Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701)1,874,409 56,978 1,931,387 Total 297,361,591 31,783,475 329,145,066 Page 189 of 275 ATTACHMENT 1 2020 CIP CHANGES PER 2020-2025 CFP SUMMARY Beginning Ending Description Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund Balance 102 Arterial Street asbd28 Downtown Transit Center Access Imp.Decrease project budget; project moved to 2022 - (100,000) (125,000) 25,000 asbd29 SE 320th Street/116th Avenue SE Roundabout Decrease project budget; project moved to 2023 - (25,000) (30,000) 5,000 Total - (125,000) (155,000) 30,000 105 Arterial Street Preservation spbd06 C Street SW Preservation Decrease project budget; project moved to 2023 - - (182,000) 182,000 430 Water Operations wabd09 Annual Distribution System Improvement Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 1,000,000 1,000,000 - wabd02 Water Repair & Replacements Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 300,000 300,000 - cp1925 2020 Local Street Reconstruction Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 500,000 500,000 - cp1926 2020 Arterial Street Preservation Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 500,000 500,000 - cp1917 Deduct Meter Replacement Prgrm -Phase 1 Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 450,000 450,000 - cp1807 Meter Vaults and Lids Transfer revenue bond proceeds to capital fund - 976,400 976,400 - Total - 3,726,400 3,726,400 - ProjectFund Requested Budget Adjustment Page 1 11/19/2019 7:17 AM Page 190 of 275 ATTACHMENT 1 2020 CIP CHANGES PER 2020-2025 CFP SUMMARY Beginning Ending Description Fund Balance Revenues Expenditures Fund BalanceProjectFund Requested Budget Adjustment 460 Water Capital wabd09 Annual Distribution System Improvement Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 wabd02 Water Repair & Replacements Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 300,000 - 300,000 cp1925 2020 Local Street Reconstruction Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 500,000 - 500,000 cp1926 2020 Arterial Street Preservation Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 500,000 - 500,000 cp1917 Deduct Meter Replacement Prgrm -Phase 1 Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 450,000 200,000 250,000 cp1807 Meter Vaults and Lids Funding change from working capital to revenue bond proceeds - 976,400 976,400 - Total - 3,726,400 1,176,400 2,550,000 462 Storm Drainage Capital sdbd12 Vegetation Sorting Facility Decrease project budget; project moved to 2021 - - (902,000) 902,000 sdbd17 23rd Street SE Storm Improvement Decrease project budget; project moved to 2021 - - (171,000) 171,000 Total - - (1,073,000) 1,073,000 465 Airport Capital apbd04 Jet A Fueling Facility Decrease project budget; project moved to 2022 - - (50,000) 50,000 apbd09 West Side Fencing Decrease project budget; project deleted - (50,200) (52,900) 2,700 Total - (50,200) (102,900) 52,700 Page 2 11/19/2019 7:17 AM Page 191 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Ordinance No. 6752 (Thomas)(10 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Finance Attachments: Transmittal Memo Ordinance No. 6752 Schedule A Schedule B Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council to introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 6752, amending the 2019 budget. Background Summary: Ordinance No. 6752 (Budget Amendment #4) represents the fourth budget amendment for the 2019-2020 biennium and the final budget amendment for 2019. For details, see the attached transmittal memorandum and supporting materials. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Thomas Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 192 of 275 Interoffice Memorandum To: City Council From: Jamie Thomas, Finance Director CC: Nancy Backus, Mayor Date: November 20, 2019 Re: Ordinance #6752 – 2019-2020 Budget Amendment #4 The City’s biennial 2019-2020 budget was approved by Council as two one-year appropriations. Budget Amendments #1 through #3 amended the budget for calendar year 2019. This amendment is the fourth budget amendment for the biennium and the final budget amendment for calendar year 2019. Proposed amendments to the 2019 budget are as follows: Project Funding Requests. Project funding requests included in this budget amendment add spending authority for new projects or establish additional spending authority for existing projects. Significant project funding requests include:  Increase revenue and associated expenditures in the Solid Waste Fund : This amendment provides an additional $600,000 in expenditure authority to cover the possibility of higher-than-expected rolloff quantities, as has been experienced in the last few months of the year for the past two years . These costs will be offset by increased revenues collected.  Increase budget for King County District Court services: This amendment provides an additional $109,000 in funding to cover the additional costs due to KCDC for court services. Other Requests. Other requests included in this budget amendment establish spending authority for new items such as contracts for service, account for the receipt and expenditure of grant revenues, recognize increased revenues and associated expenditures, and provide funding for purchases of vehicles and equipment and transfers from operating to capital funds. Significant items in this category include: Page 193 of 275  Budget for federal grant revenue for the A Street SE Preservation project. $ 760,600  Appropriate REET funding to cover the purchase of the Auburn Avenue Theater, which was authorized by Council in Resolution 5465. 650,000  Budget for federal grant for the Citywide Street Light LED Retrofit project (replacing a smaller state grant). 500,000  Provide expenditure authority in the Equipment Rental Capital Fund to replace two backhoes that have reached the end of their useful lives (fully paid-in). 315,400  Budget for the City’s share of a King County Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy grant for the South King County Senior Centers and Resources Hub. Program costs are offset by new program revenue. 109,150  Budget for state grant for Increasing Residential Building Capacity. 100,000 FTE Additions: 1.5 new positions are being requested in this amendment as part of the South King County Senior Centers and Resources Hub. These positions will be fully funded by the King County grant for the duration of the grant. The following table summarizes the current and revised budget as a result of this amendment. Table 1: 2019 Budget as Amended 2019 Amended Budget $ 351,281,455 Budget Amendment #4 (Ord #6752) 2,467,450 2019 Budget as Amended $ 353,748,905 Attachments:  1. Proposed Ordinance #6752 (budget adjustment #4)  2. Summary of proposed 2019 budget adjustments by fund (Schedule A)  3. Summary of approved changes to adopted 2019 budget by fund (Schedule B) Page 194 of 275 Ordinance No. 6752 November 19, 2019 Page 1 of 3 ORDINANCE NO. 6752 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 6693, THE 2019-2020 BIENNIAL OPERATING BUDGET ORDINANCE, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 6712, ORDINANCE NO. 6719, AND ORDINANCE NO. 6720, AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF AUBURN 2019-2020 BUDGET AS SET FORTH IN SCHEDULE “A” AND SCHEDULE “B” WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of December 3, 2018, adopted Ordinance No. 6693 which adopted the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of April 1, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6712 (BA#1) which amended Ordinance No. 6693 which adopted the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of May 20, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6719 (BA#2) which amended Ordinance No. 6712 which amended the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council at its regular meeting of July 15, 2019, adopted Ordinance No. 6720 (BA#3) which amended Ordinance No. 6719 which amended the City of Auburn 2019-2020 Biennial budget; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn deems it necessary to appropriate additional funds to the various funds of the 2019 budget as outlined in this Ordinance (BA#4); and WHEREAS, this Ordinance has been approved by one more than the majority of all councilpersons in accordance with RCW 35A.34.200. Page 195 of 275 Ordinance No. 6752 November 19, 2019 Page 2 of 3 NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment of the 2019-2020 Biennial Budget. The 2019- 2020 Biennial Budget of the City of Auburn is amended pursuant to Chapter 35A.34 RCW, to reflect the revenues and expenditures as shown on Schedule “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Mayor of the City of Auburn, Washington is hereby authorized to utilize revenue and expenditure amounts shown on said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B”. A copy of said Schedule “A” and Schedule “B” is on file with the City Clerk and available for public inspection. Section 2. Implementation. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 3. Severability. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application of it to any person or circumstance, will not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Effective date. This Ordinance will take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval, and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: _______________ PASSED: ____________________ APPROVED: _________________ Page 196 of 275 Ordinance No. 6752 November 19, 2019 Page 3 of 3 ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 197 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2019 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6752) A - 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Beg. Fund Balance 2019 Revenues 2019 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance General Fund (#001) 2019 Adopted Budget 18,037,042 72,145,986 77,788,165 12,394,863 Previous Budget Amendments 3,613,234 1,055,210 1,811,790 2,856,654 2019 Amended Budget 21,650,276 73,201,196 79,599,955 15,251,517 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 93,950 378,150 (284,200) Parks Department: Increase budget for facility rentals and associated expenditures - 60,000 60,000 - King County Veterans, Seniors and Human Services Levy grant for Resource Hub - 109,150 109,150 - Community Development Department: WA Dept of Commerce grant for Increasing Residential Building Capacity - 100,000 100,000 - Human Resources Department Increase budget for King County District Court services - - 109,000 (109,000) Non-Departmental: Adjust budget to reflect new promissory note for the Iron Horse Casino - (175,200) - (175,200) Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 001 21,650,276 73,295,146 79,978,105 14,967,317 Arterial Street Fund (#102) 2019 Adopted Budget 1,492,777 1,633,100 1,781,400 1,344,477 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 569,594 2,910,041 3,645,054 (165,419) 2019 Amended Budget 2,062,371 4,543,141 5,426,454 1,179,058 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 50,900 - 50,900 Incr federal grant for A Street SE Corridor Signal Safety Improvements project - 50,900 - 50,900 Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 102 2,062,371 4,594,041 5,426,454 1,229,958 ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Page 1 of 5 11/19/2019 6:52 AMPage 198 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2019 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6752) A - 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Beg. Fund Balance 2019 Revenues 2019 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105) 2019 Adopted Budget 1,582,337 2,959,320 3,172,240 1,369,417 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 462,122 1,492,570 2,490,713 (536,021) 2019 Amended Budget 2,044,459 4,451,890 5,662,953 833,396 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 760,600 60,600 700,000 Adjust budget to reflect federal grant for A St. SE Preservation project - 760,600 60,600 700,000 Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 105 2,044,459 5,212,490 5,723,553 1,533,396 Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117) 2019 Adopted Budget 376,497 155,000 298,037 233,460 Previous Budget Amendments 80,697 - 9,400 71,297 2019 Amended Budget 457,194 155,000 307,437 304,757 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- - 17,600 (17,600) Increase overtime for Drug Forfeiture Fund - - 17,600 (17,600) Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 117 457,194 155,000 325,037 287,157 Housing & Comm Develop Fund (#119) 2019 Adopted Budget 36,458 590,000 590,000 36,458 Previous Budget Amendments 6,446 269,900 269,900 6,446 2019 Amended Budget 42,904 859,900 859,900 42,904 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 40,000 40,000 - Reimburse CDBG Fund for sidewalk imprvmnts completed in 2019 (T/F from F328)- 40,000 40,000 - Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 119 42,904 899,900 899,900 42,904 Page 2 of 5 11/19/2019 6:52 AMPage 199 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2019 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6752) A - 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Beg. Fund Balance 2019 Revenues 2019 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Parks Construction Fund (#321) 2019 Adopted Budget 310,222 2,070,550 2,015,000 365,772 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 305,681 1,150,085 1,335,009 120,757 2019 Amended Budget 615,903 3,220,635 3,350,009 486,529 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 650,000 650,000 - REET funding for acquisition of the Auburn Avenue Theater (Transfer from F328)- 650,000 650,000 - Capital Improvements Fund (#328) 2019 Adopted Budget 10,404,627 5,775,300 8,500,550 7,679,377 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 2,921,037 914,333 3,473,360 362,010 2019 Amended Budget 13,325,664 6,689,633 11,973,910 8,041,387 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 200,000 890,000 (690,000) Reimburse CDBG Fund for sidewalk imprvmnts completed in 2019 (T/F to F119)- - 40,000 (40,000) Federal grant to replace state grant for Citywide Street Light LED Retrofit project - 200,000 200,000 - REET funding for acquisition of the Auburn Avenue Theater (Transfer to F321)- - 650,000 (650,000) Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 328 13,325,664 6,889,633 12,863,910 7,351,387 Solid Waste Fund (#434) 2019 Adopted Budget 5,556,175 16,249,100 16,296,306 5,508,969 Previous Budget Amendments 91,608 - - 91,608 2019 Amended Budget 5,647,783 16,249,100 16,296,306 5,600,577 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 600,000 600,000 - Increase rolloff revenue and expenditure to reflect potential increased quantities - 600,000 600,000 - 434.343.750 BILLING 550,000 434.343.752 YARD WASTE 50,000 Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 434 5,647,783 16,849,100 16,896,306 5,600,577 Page 3 of 5 11/19/2019 6:52 AMPage 200 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2019 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6752) A - 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Beg. Fund Balance 2019 Revenues 2019 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Airport Fund (#435) 2019 Adopted Budget 434,633 1,218,600 1,353,493 299,740 Previous Budget Amendments 155,682 80,000 133,200 102,482 2019 Amended Budget 590,315 1,298,600 1,486,693 402,222 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 50,000 80,000 (30,000) Adjust budget to reflect sale of aviation fuel and incr supplies and utility costs - 50,000 80,000 (30,000) Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 435 590,315 1,348,600 1,566,693 372,222 Water Capital Fund (#460) 2019 Adopted Budget 138,010 9,037,400 6,612,686 2,562,724 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 1,830,484 2,574,316 4,724,557 (319,757) 2019 Amended Budget 1,968,494 11,611,716 11,337,243 2,242,967 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- 22,000 22,000 - Extend water main (A St Preservation project) funded by developer contribution - 22,000 22,000 - Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 460 1,968,494 11,633,716 11,359,243 2,242,967 Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560) 2019 Adopted Budget 3,663,110 2,741,994 3,102,450 3,302,654 Previous Budget Amendments and CIP Carry-Forwards 107,022 137,200 527,500 (283,278) 2019 Amended Budget 3,770,132 2,879,194 3,629,950 3,019,376 BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed):- - 315,400 (315,400) Replace two Case backhoes (fully paid-in)- - 315,400 (315,400) Revised 2019 Budget - Fund 560 3,770,132 2,879,194 3,945,350 2,703,976 Page 4 of 5 11/19/2019 6:52 AMPage 201 of 275 Schedule A Summary of 2019 Budget Adjustments by Fund Budget Amendment #4 (Ordinance #6752) A - 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Beg. Fund Balance 2019 Revenues 2019 Expenditures Ending Fund Balance ERROR: Transfers In ≠ Transfers Out ERROR: Detail ≠ Schedule A Grand Total - All Funds 2019 Adopted Budget 121,191,833 194,308,846 207,147,258 108,353,421 Previous Budget Amendments 20,351,408 15,429,368 26,768,621 9,012,155 2019 Amended Budget 141,543,241 209,738,214 233,915,879 117,365,576 TOTAL BA#4 (Ordinance #6752, Proposed)- 2,467,450 3,053,750 (586,300) Revised 2019 Budget 141,543,241 212,205,664 236,969,629 116,779,276 353,748,905 353,748,905 Page 5 of 5 11/19/2019 6:52 AMPage 202 of 275 Schedule B 2019 Appropriations by Fund Fund 2019 Adopted Budget BA#1 (Ord #6712) CIP CFs BA#2 (Ord #6719) BA#3 (Ord #6720) BA#4 (Ord #6752) Total Amendments Revised Budget General Fund (#001)90,183,028 511,300 - 141,910 4,015,234 93,950 4,762,394 94,945,422 Arterial Street Fund (#102)3,125,877 - 1,995,054 - 1,484,581 50,900 3,530,535 6,656,412 Local Street Fund (#103)3,562,780 - 899,476 - 249,701 - 1,149,177 4,711,957 Hotel/Motel Tax Fund (#104)262,171 6,650 - - 82,454 - 89,104 351,275 Arterial Street Preservation Fund (#105)4,541,657 - 1,791,313 - 163,379 760,600 2,715,292 7,256,949 Drug Forfeiture Fund (#117)531,497 - - - 80,697 - 80,697 612,194 Housing & Comm Develop Fund (#119)626,458 269,900 - - 6,446 40,000 316,346 942,804 Recreation Trails Fund (#120)71,426 - - - 1,550 - 1,550 72,976 BIA Fund (#121)164,673 5,400 - - 940 - 6,340 171,013 Cumulative Reserve Fund (#122)10,304,512 - - - 33,754 - 33,754 10,338,266 Mitigation Fees Fund (#124)12,082,337 150,000 1,228,556 - 33,289 - 1,411,845 13,494,182 1998 GO Library Bond Fund (#229)- - - - - - - - City Hall Annex 2010 A&B Bond Fund (#230)1,664,900 - - - - - - 1,664,900 Local Revitalization 2010 C&D Bond Fund (#231)601,696 - - - 3,436 - 3,436 605,132 SCORE Debt Service Fund (#238)2,129,800 - - - - - - 2,129,800 LID Guarantee Fund (#249)1,648 - - - 15 - 15 1,663 LID 350 Fund (#275)16,059 - - - (4,956) - (4,956) 11,103 Golf/Cemetery 2016 Refunding Fund (#276)374,100 - - - 19 - 19 374,119 Parks Construction Fund (#321)2,380,772 - 1,285,009 - 170,757 650,000 2,105,766 4,486,538 Capital Improvements Fund (#328)16,179,927 54,000 2,494,960 - 1,286,410 200,000 4,035,370 20,215,297 Local Revitalization Fund (#330)484,500 - 6,000 - (4,512) - 1,488 485,988 Water Fund (#430)19,465,675 115,200 13,000 - 6,904,983 - 7,033,183 26,498,858 Sewer Fund (#431)13,371,349 12,100 13,000 - 894,808 - 919,908 14,291,257 Storm Drainage Fund (#432)13,016,714 13,800 13,000 - 1,868,064 - 1,894,864 14,911,578 Sewer Metro Sub Fund (#433)21,556,967 - - - 383,462 - 383,462 21,940,429 Solid Waste Fund (#434)21,805,275 - - - 91,608 600,000 691,608 22,496,883 Airport Fund (#435)1,653,233 40,000 - - 195,682 50,000 285,682 1,938,915 Cemetery Fund (#436)1,628,060 - - - 261,627 - 261,627 1,889,687 Water Capital Fund (#460)9,175,410 - 3,408,057 - 996,743 22,000 4,426,800 13,602,210 Sewer Capital Fund (#461)11,945,391 - 1,029,608 - 249,314 - 1,278,922 13,224,313 Storm Drainage Capital Fund (#462)13,898,388 - 646,258 - (1,394,955) - (748,697) 13,149,691 Airport Capital Fund (#465)2,240,105 - 830,908 - (35,086) - 795,822 3,035,927 Cemetery Capital Fund (#466)394,037 - 22,442 - (7,685) - 14,757 408,794 Insurance Fund (#501)1,949,070 - - - 4,456 - 4,456 1,953,526 Workers' Comp Fund (#503)3,300,188 - - - (963,880) - (963,880) 2,336,308 Facilities Fund (#505)4,945,374 104,600 - 4,500 218,143 - 327,243 5,272,617 Innovation & Technology Fund (#518)9,002,614 242,700 - 13,500 (84,338) - 171,862 9,174,476 Equipment Rental Fund (#550)5,099,232 - - - 269,475 - 269,475 5,368,707 Equipment Rental Capital Fund (#560)6,405,104 82,600 39,000 - 122,622 - 244,222 6,649,326 IT Capital Fund (#568)1,169,997 22,500 - - 368,736 - 391,236 1,561,233 Fire Pension Fund (#611)2,326,269 - - - 27,922 - 27,922 2,354,191 SKHHP Fund (#654)- - - 220,160 - - 220,160 220,160 Cemetery Endowment Fund (#701)1,862,409 - 22,442 - 56,978 - 79,420 1,941,829 Total 315,500,679 1,630,750 15,738,083 380,070 18,031,873 2,467,450 38,248,226 353,748,905 Page 203 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5463 (Hinman)(5 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Administration Attachments: RES 5463 - Airport Land Lease Amendments Exhibit A - Auburn Condo Hangars Association Exhibit B - James Jacobsen Exhibit C Auburn Hangars Owners Association Exhibit D - Auburn Flyers Condo I Exhibit E - Auburn Flyers Condo II Exhibit F - Auburn Flyers Condo III Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Adopt Resolution 5463 so that those land leases on the Auburn Municipal Airport subject to the 2020 Fair Market Value assessment can have their rate increase implemented incrementally over a two year period. Background Summary: Six of the airport land leases are subject to Fair Market Value (FMV) lease rate adjustments in the upcoming 2020 term. Valbridge Property Advisors delivered an MAI appraisal dated September 30, 2019 establishing the current FMV for airport land at $0.825 per square foot per year. This valuation represents roughly a 36% increase over the 2019 lease rate. Amending the lease agreements to allow for implementing the 2020 term FMV increase in two separate increments between the 2020 & 2021 terms would ease the financial burden of the Airport tenants. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Hinman Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 204 of 275 ---------------------------- Resolution No 5463. November 12, 2019 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION NO 5 4 6 3. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENTS TO CERTAIN AUBURN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT LAND LEASES RELATING TO THE IMPLAMENTATION OF THE 2020 FAIR MARKET VALUE LEASE RATE ADJUSTMENT. WHEREAS, the City of Auburn has entered into various land leases over the last several years for land located on the Auburn Municipal Airport; and WHEREAS, each of the land leases contains a Fair Market Valuation (FMV) rent escalation clause; and WHEREAS, the appraisal establishing the FMV rent for the 2020 term calculated a rent amount that is substantially higher than the current lease rate; and WHEREAS, the City and those tenants subject to the 2020 FMV escalation each desire to increase the rent over two years in an effort to ease the financial burden on those Airport land tenants. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, HEREBY RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. That the Mayor is authorized to execute lease amendments to the six Airport land leases subject to the 2020 FMV escalation provided that each amendment is in substantial conformity to the respective exhibit, attached as Exhibits “A” , “B,” “C,” “D,” “E,” and “F.” Section 2. That the Mayor is authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Page 205 of 275 ---------------------------- Resolution No 5463. November 12, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Section 3. That this Resolution shall take effect and be in full force upon passage and signatures hereon. Dated and Signed this _____ day of _________________, 2019. CITY OF AUBURN ________________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: _________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: _________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 206 of 275 Page 207 of 275 Page 208 of 275 Page 209 of 275 Page 210 of 275 Page 211 of 275 Page 212 of 275 Page 213 of 275 Page 214 of 275 Page 215 of 275 Page 216 of 275 Page 217 of 275 Page 218 of 275 Page 219 of 275 Page 220 of 275 Page 221 of 275 Page 222 of 275 Page 223 of 275 Page 224 of 275 Page 225 of 275 Page 226 of 275 Page 227 of 275 Page 228 of 275 Page 229 of 275 Page 230 of 275 Page 231 of 275 Page 232 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5474 (Hinman)(5 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Administration Attachments: RES 5474 - SCA 2020 Legis lative Priorities SCA 2020 Legislative Committee Draft Priorities Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Endorse the Sound Cities Association 2020 State Legislative Agenda. Background Summary: As a member city of the Sound Cities Association (SCA), the Sound Cities Association 2020 Legislative Agenda is presented to the Auburn City Council for endorsement. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Hinman Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 233 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5474 December 2, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 5474 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ENDORSING THE SOUND CITIES ASSOCIATION 2020 STATE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA WHEREAS, the actions of the Washington State Legislature in respect to local government issues, services, and funding have a profound effect on the City’s ability to provide local services to its residents; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Sound Cities Association, and which represents 38 cities of King County, and provides a voice for over one million people; and, WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council believes that it is appropriate to communicate its support for the Sound Cities Association’s legislative agenda. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The City Council endorses the Sound Cities Association 2020 Legislative Agenda as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 2. The Mayor shall cause a copy of this Resolution to the City’s State Legislative District representatives and to other regional government entities. Page 234 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5474 December 2, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2019 Section 3. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage and signatures. Dated and Signed: CITY OF AUBURN ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 235 of 275 DRAFT SCA 2020 Legislative Agenda Address the Affordable Housing and Homelessness Crisis The state and cities must partner to preserve and increase the supply of affordable housing as, well as address behavioral health needs and other root causes of homelessness. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Allow cities to create and preserve affordable housing through optional local tools, including extending the timeline to approve a “qualifying local tax” provided under HB 1406 adopted in the 2019 legislative session  Continue to expand investment in the Housing Trust Fund  Address other underlying causes of homelessness by providing support to cities to implement innovative local solutions and increasing investments in our state’s behavioral health system Invest in Transportation Infrastructure and Mobility The economic vitality of our state demands that we invest in our existing transportation infrastructure and prioritize new investments that improve the movement of people and goods. Cities have increased investments in local transportation systems, but still face an annual funding gap for maintenance and operation of those systems of $1 billion statewide. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Partner with cities to develop a comprehensive transportation bill that provides new resources and options for local government to address transportation and mobility needs Fully Fund the Public Works Trust Fund and Provide Options for Local Infrastructure Needs Today’s cities are building the infrastructure necessary to accommodate a growing population and economy. Investments in infrastructure keep communities vibrant, protect the environment, and attract economic development. Cities need tools to lower the cost of providing local infrastructure and to avoid further exacerbating the housing affordability crisis. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Fully fund the Public Works Trust Fund  Support economic development tools that help maintain and expand local infrastructure, such as Tax Increment Financing and similar tools Preserve Local Decision-Making Authority Cities possess strong local knowledge and authority to keep communities safe, healthy, and improve quality of life. It is critical cities maintain the authority to provide the necessary services and retain local control over land use planning that will help communities thrive. Provide the Tools for Cities to Address Local Priorities City revenue streams are limited and are not structured to sustainably keep -up with rising costs. Cities need flexible local funding tools, fewer unfunded mandates, and continued support from the state for shared responsibilities. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Replace the arbitrary 1% cap on annual property tax increases with a limit tied to inflation plus population growth  Meet the state’s commitment to revenues intended to be shared with cities to serve our shared constituents  Continue streamlined sales tax mitigation to affected cities Page 236 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5475 (Hinman)(10 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Administration Attachments: RES 5475 - City of Auburn 2020 Legislative Priorities 2020 City of Auburn DRAFT Legislative Agenda Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Adopt the 2020 City of Auburn State and Federal Legislative Agendas. Background Summary: Each year, the City of Auburn adopts a State and Federal 2020 Legislative Agenda to guide our work throughout the year as we work with our legislative delegations in Olympia and Washington, D.C. on the issues that will benefit Auburn. These priorities are presented as the top priorities for Auburn in the 2020 legislative sessions in Olympia and the Washington, D.C. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Hinman Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 237 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5474 December 2, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 5474 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, ENDORSING THE SOUND CITIES ASSOCIATION 2020 STATE LEGISLATIVE AGENDA WHEREAS, the actions of the Washington State Legislature in respect to local government issues, services, and funding have a profound effect on the City’s ability to provide local services to its residents; and WHEREAS, the City is a member of the Sound Cities Association, and which represents 38 cities of King County, and provides a voice for over one million people; and, WHEREAS, the Auburn City Council believes that it is appropriate to communicate its support for the Sound Cities Association’s legislative agenda. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The City Council endorses the Sound Cities Association 2020 Legislative Agenda as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 2. The Mayor shall cause a copy of this Resolution to the City’s State Legislative District representatives and to other regional government entities. Page 238 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5474 December 2, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2019 Section 3. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage and signatures. Dated and Signed: CITY OF AUBURN ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 239 of 275 DRAFT SCA 2020 Legislative Agenda Address the Affordable Housing and Homelessness Crisis The state and cities must partner to preserve and increase the supply of affordable housing as, well as address behavioral health needs and other root causes of homelessness. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Allow cities to create and preserve affordable housing through optional local tools, including extending the timeline to approve a “qualifying local tax” provided under HB 1406 adopted in the 2019 legislative session  Continue to expand investment in the Housing Trust Fund  Address other underlying causes of homelessness by providing support to cities to implement innovative local solutions and increasing investments in our state’s behavioral health system Invest in Transportation Infrastructure and Mobility The economic vitality of our state demands that we invest in our existing transportation infrastructure and prioritize new investments that improve the movement of people and goods. Cities have increased investments in local transportation systems, but still face an annual funding gap for maintenance and operation of those systems of $1 billion statewide. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Partner with cities to develop a comprehensive transportation bill that provides new resources and options for local government to address transportation and mobility needs Fully Fund the Public Works Trust Fund and Provide Options for Local Infrastructure Needs Today’s cities are building the infrastructure necessary to accommodate a growing population and economy. Investments in infrastructure keep communities vibrant, protect the environment, and attract economic development. Cities need tools to lower the cost of providing local infrastructure and to avoid further exacerbating the housing affordability crisis. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Fully fund the Public Works Trust Fund  Support economic development tools that help maintain and expand local infrastructure, such as Tax Increment Financing and similar tools Preserve Local Decision-Making Authority Cities possess strong local knowledge and authority to keep communities safe, healthy, and improve quality of life. It is critical cities maintain the authority to provide the necessary services and retain local control over land use planning that will help communities thrive. Provide the Tools for Cities to Address Local Priorities City revenue streams are limited and are not structured to sustainably keep -up with rising costs. Cities need flexible local funding tools, fewer unfunded mandates, and continued support from the state for shared responsibilities. Sound Cities Association urges the Legislature to:  Replace the arbitrary 1% cap on annual property tax increases with a limit tied to inflation plus population growth  Meet the state’s commitment to revenues intended to be shared with cities to serve our shared constituents  Continue streamlined sales tax mitigation to affected cities Page 240 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: AVHS Board Update (Thomas)(10 Minutes) Date: November 19, 2019 Department: Finance Attachments: No Attachments Av ailable Budget Impact: Administrativ e Recommendation: For discussion only. Background Summary: Auburn Valley Humane Society (AVHS) is the contracted service provider for the City’s pet licensing program. AVHS has served in that capacity since March 2018. A presentation will be provided which draws upon highlights contained within the AVHS 2018 Annual Report. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Thomas Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 241 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: 2019 Fireworks Update (Pierson)(15 Minutes) Date: November 20, 2019 Department: Police Attachments: Fireworks PPT Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Background Summary: Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff:Pierson Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 242 of 275 Fireworks 2019 November 25, 2019 Commander D. O’Neil Chief B. Pierson Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 243 of 275 Agenda •Infractions vs Citations •State Law vs Auburn Municipal Code •Ban vs State Law •Challenges to arrest •Challenges to prosecution •Review of Valley Cities •Review of Surrounding Cities •Plans For Next Year Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 244 of 275 Infraction vs Citation •Infractions: Are civil and result in a monetary fine. The fine can be paid or challenged in court by way of a civil hearing. The proof is preponderance of the evidence meaning that it more than likely occurred. (Example: Speeding ticket) •Citations:Are misdemeanors and require a mandatory court appearance. Prosecutorial discretion. Can be amended to civil penalty, dismissed, or resolved through a bench or jury trial. The burden is proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 245 of 275 State Law •RCW 70.77.395 Times when fireworks can be sold and discharged in Washington State Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Holiday Date Sales Period Discharge Period 4th of July June 28 12PM to 11PM 12PM to 11PM June 29 to July 3 9AM to 11PM 9AM to 11PM July 4 9AM to 11PM 9AM to Midnight July 5 9AM to 9PM 9AM to 11 PM Page 246 of 275 State Law •RCW 70.77.401 No fireworks may be sold or offered for sale to the public as consumer fireworks which are classified as sky rockets, or missile-type rockets, firecrackers, salutes, or chasers as defined by the United States department of transportation and the federal consumer products safety commission. (Except on Tribal Land) •RCW 70.77.136 "Consumer fireworks" means any small firework device designed to produce visible effects by combustion and which must comply with the construction, chemical composition, and labeling regulations of the United States consumer product safety commission, as set forth in 16 C.F.R. Parts 1500 and 1507 and including some small devices designed to produce audible effects, such as whistling devices, ground devices containing 50 mg or less of explosive materials, and aerial devices containing 130 mg or less of explosive materials and classified as fireworks UN0336 by the United States department of transportation at 49 C.F.R. Sec. 172.101 as of June 13, 2002, and not including fused set pieces containing components which together exceed 50 mg of salute powder. (Fountains, spinners, smoke devices, roman candles, parachutes, wheels, shells, mortars, sparklers.) Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 247 of 275 Ban vs State Law •Jurisdictions that impose a complete ban do not allow the possession or discharge of any fireworks. •Jurisdictions that follow state law allow the possession and discharge of fireworks as outlined in RCW 70.77.136 •(Fountains, spinners, smoke devices, roman candles, parachutes, wheels, shells, mortars, sparklers.) Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 248 of 275 Auburn Municipal Code •AMC 8.24.030: The following fireworks are able to be manufactured, possessed, used or detonated within the City of Auburn Washington. •Sparkler •Cylindrical Fountain •Cone Fountain •Illuminating Torch •Wheel •Ground Spinner •Filter Sparkler •Smoke Device Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 249 of 275 Auburn Municipal Code •AMC 8.24.050 •Any person violating any provision of this chapter is guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction shall be punished by a fine in an amount not exceeding $1,000, or by imprisonment in jail for a term not exceeding 90 days, or by both. In the case of a conviction for a violation of this chapter, the city’s fire marshal or designee may order the fireworks stand closed and may deny approval of a request by the person for a fireworks license for the next year. •AMC 2.22.250 •Unless specifically designated in the Auburn City Code as a gross misdemeanor or misdemeanor, or if specified to be enforced pursuant to other law, including, but not limited to, another section, chapter, or title of the Auburn City Code, any violation of this chapter shall constitute a Class 1 infraction, not to exceed $250.00, not including statutory assessments.(Civil Infraction to discharge fireworks in the park but a misdemeanor throughout the rest of the city.) Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 250 of 275 Challenges to Arrest •In order to issue a citation for a fireworks violation, officers must establish probable cause. Officers must identify facts and circumstances that a violation occurred and a specific person is responsible for that violation. •Typical scenario involves officers showing up to a fireworks complaint. Upon arrival, a group of adults are standing around fireworks. When no one claims ownership, officers are left with no other alternative except to seize the fireworks. •Despite zero tolerance, officers still exercise discretion in order to avoid arresting otherwise law abiding citizens. (Example, Law abiding Boeing Engineer is discharging fireworks with his kids on the 4th of July during a BBQ. If he receives a criminal citation for unlawfully discharging fireworks his security clearance could be in jeopardy and ultimately cost him his job.) Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 251 of 275 Challenges to Prosecution •Public defender funds since it is a misdemeanor crime. •Most jurors view it as a minor offense and are less likely to convict. •Most citizens who are cited are law abiding with no criminal history. Prosecutorial discretion results in alternatives to filing charges. •Since 2016, 19 cases have been referred to the prosecutors office. 11 were dismissed or have no charging decision yet. 5 have been amended to infractions with a monetary fine attached. 3 have gone to warrant status. Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 252 of 275 Valley Cities 2019 •Federal Way: •Firework Enforcement Teams 1 Commander, 1 LT, and 10 Officers. •Firework Enforcement Teams issued 19 charges and 7 warnings between June 30 and July 6. •Firework violations in Federal Way are civil infractions. •Total calls from June 30 to July 6 180 •Calls from 1100 on 07/04/2019 to 0800 on 07/05 126 •Zero tolerance and officers are expected to issue civil infractions Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 253 of 275 Valley Cities 2019 •Renton: •Civil infractions with fines ranging between $100 and $500. •Violations are enforced by the Fire Department. •Calls between 06/30 and 07/06 198 •Calls between 1100 on 07/04/2019 to 0800 on 07/05 128 •Zero Tolerance and complete ban Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 254 of 275 Valley Cities 2019 •Kent: •Complete ban of all fireworks for the second straight year. •Civil Infraction $250 •4 two officer cars for fireworks emphasis. (2 Sergeants and 1 Commander) •Between July 1 thru July 6th 266 firework related calls. •Fireworks Seized 31 pounds •Warnings 4 •Infractions 16 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 255 of 275 Valley Cities 2019 •Auburn: •State approved fireworks are legal on the 4th of July. If it goes up or blows up it is illegal. •Criminal Citation •1 Sergeant and 6 Officers at the Stands •2 Sergeants and 14 Officers assigned to fireworks emphasis •6 Arrests Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Page 256 of 275 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Ban Citation Infraction Penalty Auburn No Yes No Mandatory Appearance Kent Yes No Yes $250 Renton Yes No Yes $205/$410/$615 Tukwila Yes No Yes $100/$175/$250 Federal Way Yes No Yes $300 Page 257 of 275 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Ban Citation Infraction Penalty Bellevue Yes No Yes $1,000 Bonney Lake No No No N/A Burien Yes No Yes $125 Edgewood No No No N/A Enumclaw No No No N/A King County No No No N/A Pierce County No No No N/A Page 258 of 275 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Complete Ban in Kent •In 2017 The City of Kent banned all fireworks. 1100 on 07/04 until 0800 on 07/05 Kent Auburn 2016 175 114 2017 (First Year of Ban)297 181 2018 193 154 2019 174 172 Page 259 of 275 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Challenges to Enforcement •Identifying the specific location where the firework violation came from. •Responding in a timely manner to catch the offender still on site. •Identifying the offender once on site. •Officer observing the offender at the time of the violation. Finding witnesses who will cooperate with prosecution. •Largest distributor of fireworks in the region is located within the city. •The city cannot control what is sold on the reservation. Regulations as to what can be sold on the reservation are based on federal standards. Page 260 of 275 Courage Honor Integrity Professionalism Recommendations for 2020 •Close the city parks around 1900. This will allow officers to focus on residential areas. •Encourage businesses to post no trespassing signs or rent barricades closing parking lots. •Keep the discharge area open after the stands close in order to prevent the discharge of fireworks from other locations within the city. •Emphasis on education through social media and public service announcements. •Post firework signs at city boundaries. •Reader boards on Auburn Way S letting patrons know when the discharge area is closed. •Code Red message on the 4th reminding citizens of firework laws. Page 261 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Resolution No. 5473 (Faber)(10 Minutes) Date: November 14, 2019 Department: Parks/Art and Recreation Attachments: Resolution 5473 Res 2555 / Park Naming Kersey A Kersey B Park Inventory Parks Policy 1130 / Naming Parks Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: City Council approve Resolution 5473 assigning names to 2 City of Auburn Parks. Background Summary: The Kersey 3 development was required to construct two public parks as part of the development agreement. Upon completion of these parks were turned over to the City of Auburn. For the last three years they have operated without formally approved names. Park Board, following Park Policy 1130 and Resolution 2555 (which sets forth policies and procedures related to the naming of public property and facilities) approve of these two names. Park Board members and staff gathered information from the public related to proposed names and approved the names of Evergreen Park in Kersey A and Edgeview Park in Kersey B of the Kersey 3 development at the September Park Board meeting. Rev iewed by Council Committees: Municipal Services Councilmember:Brown Staff:Faber Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 262 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5473 November 18, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2019 RESOLUTION NO. 5473 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, NAMING TWO PUBLIC FACILITIES LOCATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF AUBURN WHEREAS, Resolution 2555 established the City’s procedure for naming public parks, property, and facilities; and WHEREAS, in accordance with that Resolution, the City considers such factors as the names of geographical areas or references; natural or geological features; historical or cultural significance; or individuals (or entities) who have made substantial donations to the public park or facilities or who have been otherwise instrumental in the acquisition or development of the public park or facilities; and WHEREAS, the City owns and maintains a park located in the “Kersey A” portion of the Kersey 3 (Edgeview) development that is unnamed; and . WHEREAS, the City owns and maintains a park located in the “Kersey B” portion of the Kersey 3 (Edgeview) development that also lacks a name; and . WHEREAS, the Auburn Parks and Recreation Board, using the criteria stated in Resolution 2555, and following the city procedure for naming parks, has identified names for both of the Kersey 3 parks and recommends them to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RESOLVES as follows: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Auburn finds that “Evergreen Park” meets the naming criteria in Resolution 2555 and is a suitable name for the park located Page 263 of 275 -------------------------------- Resolution No. 5473 November 18, 2019 Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2019 in the Kersey A development at Charlotte Avenue SE and Evergreen Way SE in Auburn, Washington. Section 2. The city-owned park located at Charlotte Avenue SE and Evergreen Way SE in the Kersey A development shall be named the “Evergreen Park.” Section 3. The City Council of the City of Auburn finds that “Edgeview Park” meets the naming criteria in Resolution 2555 and is a suitable name for the park located in the Kersey B development at Udall Avenue SE and 56th Street SE in Auburn, Washington. Section 4. The city-owned park located at Udall Avenue SE and 56th Street SE in the Kersey B development shall be named the “Edgeview Park.” Section 5. The Mayor is authorized to implement those administrative procedures necessary to carry out the directives of this legislation. Section 6. This Resolution will take effect and be in full force on passage and signatures. Dated and Signed: CITY OF AUBURN ____________________________ NANCY BACKUS, MAYOR ATTEST: ____________________________ Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ Steven L. Gross, City Attorney Page 264 of 275 Page 265 of 275 Page 266 of 275 Page 267 of 275 55TH ST SE Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Printed On: 8/6/2015 Map ID: 4650 Page 268 of 275 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. Printed On: 8/6/2015 Map ID: 4650 Page 269 of 275 ¬«38 ¬«44 ¬«25 ¬«34¬«43¬«52 ¬«49 ¬«42¬«47 ¬«15 ¬«54 ¬«31 ¬«32 ¬«37 ¬«23 ¬«35 ¬«19 ¬«26 ¬«9 ¬«60 ¬«6 ¬«29 ¬«11 ¬«33¬«20 ¬«3 ¬«24 ¬«22 ¬«48 ¬«56¬«56 ¬«50 ¬«4 ¬«5 ¬«59 ¬«58 ¬«51 ¬«8 ¬«10 ¬«12 ¬«57 ¬«2 ¬«55 ¬«45 ¬«13 ¬«7 ¬«1 ¬«46 ¬«16 ¬«17 ¬«55 ¬«14 ¬«40 ¬«53 ¬«39 ¬«36 ¬«18 ¬«27 ¬«28¬«21 ¬«30 L A K ELAKETAPPSTAPPS TS18 TS18 MERIDIAN AVE EJO V IT AB L V D E S 277TH ST WESTVALLEYHWYS24TH ST E SE 274TH ST PACIFIC AVE S132ND AVE SEE ASTVALLEYHWYS 288TH ST MI LI TARYRDS ELLINGSON RD SW S 272ND ST WESTVALLEYHWYSE 272ND ST 8TH ST E28TH AVE S140TH AVE E136TH AVE E108TH AVE SEMILTON WAY 142ND AVE EWEST VALLEY HWY NW38TH AVE SSE K E N T - K A N GLEYRD STEWART RD SWW ESTVALLEYHWYEVALENTINE AVE SE68TH AVE S33RD P L S 124TH AVE SE116TH AVE SEPEASLEY CANYONRDS CENTRAL AVE SENCHANTED PKWY SSTEWART RD SE A ST SEMILITARY RD SS 272ND ST WESTVAL LEYHWYSMILITARY RD SSE 272ND ST 124TH AVE SEMILITARY RD S12TH ST E S 288TH ST 182ND AVE E9TH ST E AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND R D SEFORES T CANYONRDE S 272ND ST 214TH AVE E2 1 0 T H A VE E SUMNER-TAPPSHWYE16TH ST E S 272ND W AY E NCHANT ED PKWY S A U B UR N- E NU MC L A W R D SAUBURN WAY NWEST VALLEY HWY SMILITARY RD SMILITARYRDSMILIT ARYRDSTS167 TS167 MUCKL ESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLL ECTIO N A ST SEC ST SWA U B U R N W A Y SB ST NWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY N51ST AVE SR ST SE124TH AVE SEWEST VALLEY HWY NC ST NW132ND AVE SES 277TH ST 15TH ST SW W MAIN ST SE 304TH ST LAKETAPPSPKWY S E E MAIN ST 41STSTSE K E R S E YWAYSE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW ORAVETZRDSEL AKELANDHILLSWAYSE104THAVESESE 320TH ST S 316TH ST 321ST ST S PEASLEYCANYONR DS AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SE112TH AVE SEEAST VALLEY HWY ESE304THWA Y SE 281ST ST SUMNER-TAPPSHWYE 17TH ST SE SE 32 0TH ST A ST SES E 3 0 4T H ST K E N TKENT K I N GKING C O U N T YCOUNTY E D G E W O O DEDGEWOOD P A C I F I CPACIFIC S U M N E RSUMNER A L G O N AALGONA P I E R C EPIERCE C O U N T YCOUNTY FEDE R A LFEDERALWAYWAY Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. ¬ Map ID: 4502 C i t y o f A u b u r n Pa r k s I n v e n t o r y M a p Printed On: 5/28/2015 City of Auburn City Parks Open Space Special Use Areas Undeveloped Parks 15 21ST STREET PLAYGROUND 16 AUB UR ND ALE 17 AUBURNDALE 2 18 BALLARD 19 CAMERON 20 CEDAR LANES 21 DOROTHY BOTHELL 22 DYK STRA 23 FOR EST V ILLA TOT LOT 24 GA IN ES 25 IND IA N TOM 26 JORNADA 27 KER SEY WAY A 28 KERSEY WAY B 29 LAKELAND HILLS 30 NORTH TAPPS ESTATES 31 RIV ER POIN T 32 RIVERSANDS 33 ROTARY 34 SCOOTIE BROWN 35 SHAUGHNESSY 36 TERMINAL 37 VILLAGE S QUAR EIDNAME1104TH AVE SE 2 BRA NN AN 3 FULMER 4 GAME FARM 5 GAME FARM WILDERNESS 6 GS A 7 ISAAC EVANS 8 JAC OBSE N TR EE FA RM 9 LE A HILL 10 LES GOVE COMMUNITY CAMPUS 11 MILL PON D 12 ROEGNER 13 SUN SET 14 VETER AN S M EMORIAL 38 B STR EE T PLAZA 39 BIC EN TENN IA L 40 CENTENNIAL VIEWPOINT 42 CLARK PLAZA 43 COMMUNITY GARDEN A 44 COMMUNITY GARDEN B 45 ENVIRONMENT 46 FENSTER PROPERTY 47 FLY-IN LION 48 GOLF C OUR SE 49 LE A HILL TE NN IS COU RTS 50 MARY OLSON FARM 51 MOU N TAIN V IEW C EME TERY 52 PION EER C EMETARY 53 PLAZA PAR K 54 SLAUGH TER MEMOR IA L 55 CLAR K P ROPE RTY 56 ENVIRONMENTAL 57 GAME FARM OPEN SPACE 58 GOLF C OUR SE OPEN SPAC E 59 LA KELAN D HILLS NATUR E A REA 60 WES T A UB UR N LA KE PROP ERTY COMMUNITY NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL USE AREA OPEN SPACE Page 270 of 275 Page 1 of 2 Policy # 1130 MANUAL OF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation Board Auburn, Washington Number 1130 Effective: October 15, 2013 (supercedes November 2, 2004) Section 1000 Administration Subject 100 Authority and Objectives Title 30 Naming Parks PURPOSE: To establish policy for the City of Auburn Parks, Arts and Recreation to name newly acquired or developed or as-yet unnamed parks and recreation facilities, after following the procedures outlined here and in compliance with Resolution No. 2555. 1. Responsibility 1.1 The Auburn Parks and Recreation Board shall make a recommendation to the council. The Board shall solicit public input from individuals and organizations. 1.2 The City Council has the final authority for naming City public facilities. 2. Procedures 2.1 The Parks and Recreation Board will meet on their normal schedule, unless a special meeting is called. The Parks and Recreation Director, or his designee, will provide staff support. 2.2 The Parks and Recreation Board will use public input to solicit suggestions for names from organizations and individuals. The Board will acknowledge, and record for consideration, all suggestions, solicited or not. 2.3 After considering the submitted names and applying the criteria set forth in 3 below, the Board will recommend names to the Mayor and City Council, and provide the historical or other supportive information as appropriate to justify the recommendation. 2.4 The Parks and Recreation Director, with the advice of the Parks and Recreation Board, will take all necessary steps to submit the recommendation to the Mayor and City Council at their next scheduled meeting. 3. Criteria 3.1 To avoid duplication, confusing similarity, or inappropriateness, the Board, in considering name suggestions, will review existing park and facility names in the park system . Page 271 of 275 Page 2 of 2 Policy # 1130 3.2 In naming a park or facility, the Board will consider geographical location, historical or cultural significance, distinctive natural or geological features, and the wishes of the community in which it is located. 3.3 In naming community centers and other facilities, the Board will give considerable weight to names that reflect the geographic location that gives identity to the community. 3.4 Selection of names to be used to designate public facilities shall be based on the relationship of that parcel of land or facility based on the following criteria: (a) neighborhood, geographic, or common usage or referral identification; historical figure, place, event, or other instance of historical or cultural significance; (b) natural or geological feature; (c) an individual, living or deceased, who has made a significant land and/or monetary contribution to the park system or who has had such contribution made “in memoriam” with the name stipulated as a condition of donation; (d) an individual, living or deceased, who contributed outstanding civic service to the City, community, or City government. A period of at least one year shall expire before naming of a park or facility honoring a deceased person. 3.5 As a general rule, portions of a park or recreation facility will not have a name other than that of the entire facility; the Board may consider exceptions in cases where, as a revenue or fundraising opportunity, a nomination is submitted to name a room within a community center after a corporate sponsor, or in cases where an area within a park is distinctive enough, in the view of the Board, to merit its own name. 3.6 Because temporary “working” designations tend to be retained, the Director will carry out the naming process for a new park facility as early as possible after its acquisition or development. Facilities will bear number designations until the naming process results in adoption of a name. 3.7 Recommendations of the Board will be taken to the Mayor and City Council for final approval. 3.8 A name, once bestowed, should be so named with the intent that it is permanent. 3.9 City signage shall identify the specific park or facility by placing appropriate signage specifying the name. Page 272 of 275 AGENDA BILL APPROVAL FORM Agenda Subject: Matrix Date: November 19, 2019 Department: City Council Attachments: Special Focus Area Key Matrix Budget Impact: Current Budget: $0 Proposed Revision: $0 Revised Budget: $0 Administrativ e Recommendation: Background Summary: Rev iewed by Council Committees: Councilmember:Staff: Meeting Date:November 25, 2019 Item Number: Page 273 of 275 SPECIAL FOCUS AREAS COMMUNITY WELLNESS FINANCE, TECHNOLOGY, & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PUBLIC WORKS & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES HOMELESSNESS & HOMELESSNESS PREVENTION HOUSING QUALITY, AFFORDABILITY & ATTAINABILITY HUMAN & SOCIAL SERVICES DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES COMMUNITY EQUITY EQUIPMENT RENTAL FACILITIES INNOVATION & TECHNOLOGY CITY REAL PROPERTY BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SISTER CITIES INTERNATIONAL UTILITIES TRANSPORTATION SUSTAINABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CULTURAL ARTS & PUBLIC ARTS PLANNING & ZONING PERMITS & DEVELOPMENT RIGHT OF WAY MANAGEMENT AIRPORT AIRPORT BUSINESS POLICE SCORE JAIL DISTRICT COURT PARKS & RECREATION ANIMAL CONTROL SOLID WASTE ENERGENCY PLANNING MULTIMEDIA CEMETERY Councilmember Trout-Manuel, Chair Councilmember Wales, Chair Councilmember DaCorsi, Chair Councilmember Brown, Chair Councilmember DaCorsi, Vice Chair Councilmember Holman, Vice Chair Councilmember Baggett, Vice Chair Deputy Mayor Peloza, Vice Chair 2019 MEETING DATES 2019 MEETING DATES 2019 MEETING DATES 2019 MEETING DATES February 11, 2019 February 25, 2019 January 14, 2019 January 28, 2019 April 8, 2019 April 22, 2019 March 11, 2019 March 25, 2019 June 10, 2019 June 24, 2019 May 13, 2019 May 27, 2019 August 12, 2019 August 26, 2019 July 8, 2019 July 22, 2019 October 14, 2019 October 28, 2019 September 9, 2019 September 23, 2019 December 9, 2019 December 23, 2019 November 12, 2019 November 25, 2019 Page 274 of 275 Updated 11-13-2019 NO.TOPIC Chair STAFF LEAD(S)STUDY SESSION REVIEW DATE(S) COUNCIL DISCUSSION SUMMARY ACTION DATE 1 Metro Bus Barn Site Chair DaCorsi Vice Chair Baggett Director Gaub Director Tate TBD 2 WRIA 9 - 101 Indoctrination Chair DaCorsi Vice Chair Baggett Director Gaub Director Tate TBD - 2020 3 Funding Options Chair Wales Vice Chair Holman Director Thomas Ongoing 4 2019 Fireworks Update Chair Brown Vice Chair Peloza Chief Pierson 11/25/2019 5 AVHS Board Update Chair Brown Vice Chair Peloza Director Thomas 11/25/2019 COUNCIL MATRIX Page 275 of 275