Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout6803ORDINANCE NO. 6 8 0 3 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO PLANNING; ADOPTING 2020 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF RCW CHAPTER 36.70A AND ADOPTING CORRESPONDING REZONES RELATED TO CERTAIN MAP AMENDMENTS WHEREAS, since 1986 the City of Auburn has maintained a Comprehensive Plan, periodically updated and reaffirmed by the City Council, that includes a Map establishing the location of the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations throughout the City; and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2015, the Auburn City Council adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan by Ordinance No. 6584; and WHEREAS, in May 2020 the City of Auburn published in the Seattle Times Newspaper an advertisement that the City was accepting comprehensive plan amendment applications and established a deadline for submittal of June 5, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received and processed two private-initiated map amendments for the year 2020 annual amendments; (Auburn School District as CPA20- 0001 and REZ20-0001, Westport Capital as CPA20-0002 and REZ20-0002); and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn received and processed one private-initiated text amendment for the year 2020 annual amendments; (Auburn Adventist Academy as CPA20-0003); and WHEREAS, the City of Auburn initiated one map amendment (File No. CPA20- 0005) and seven policy/text amendments (File No. CPA20-0005); and WHEREAS, to maintain consistency between the city's zoning map and its Comprehensive Plan, both the private initiated map amendments have an associated Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 1 rezone (zoning map amendment) to maintain consistency with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan text/policy amendments and map amendments were processed by the Community Development Department as proposed Year 2020 annual amendments to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70A, requires the City to maintain a current Capital Facilities Plan; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts of the proposed Year 2020 Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezones were considered in accordance with procedures of the State Environmental Policy Act File No. SEP20-0018 (city-initiated amendments), SEP20-0006 (Westport Capital private-initiated amendment), SEP20- 0012 (Auburn Adventist Academy private-initiated amendment), and SEP20-0013 Auburn School District Chinook Elementary private-initiated amendment) were determined to have no significant adverse environmental; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments were transmitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce, Growth Management Services Division, and other State agencies for the 60-day review period in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, after proper notice published in the City's official newspaper at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearings, the Auburn Planning Commission on November 4, 2020 and November 17, 2020, conducted public hearings on the proposed amendments, heard and considered public testimony, viewed the evidence and exhibits presented to it, and made recommendations to the City Council on the proposed Year Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 2 2020 annual Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments and for certain amendments, on the associated rezones; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2020, the Auburn City Council reviewed the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUBURN, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Application CPA20-0003, Auburn Adventist Academy Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendment, requesting a text amendment to amend Land Use Policy LU-135 and Academy Special Planning Area Plan Policies A.1 .2 and A.1 .8. is approved, as set forth in Exhibits "B.1" and "B.2," and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 transmittal memo to the Council, as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Section 2. Application CPA20-0002, Westport Capital Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Multiple-Family Residential"to "Moderate Density Residential" for three parcels totaling approximately 5.3 acres, identified by King County parcel numbers: 0004200025, 0004200019, and 0004200013, and a land use designation change from "Single-Family" to "Moderate Density Residential" for three parcels totaling approximately 31.8 acres, identified by King County parcel numbers: 0004200022, 0004200024, and 0004200003 is approved, as set forth in Exhibits "C.1" and "C.2," and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 transmittal memo to the Council as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 3 Section 3. Application CPA20-0001 & REZ20-0001 , Auburn School District, Chinook Elementary School Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, requesting a land use designation change from "Multiple-Family" to "Institutional" and a rezone (zoning map amendment) from "R-20 Residential — Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre" to "P-1 — Public Use District" for one parcel totaling approximately 2.19 acres, identified by King County parcel number: 2121059042 is approved, as set forth in Exhibits "D.1" and "D.2," and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 transmittal memo to the City Council, as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Section 4. The 2020 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map and Text Amendments (CPA20-0005), as set forth in Exhibits "E.1," "E.2," "E.3," "E.4," and "E.5" are approved. The full text of the Capital Facilities Plan of the City and the four school district's Capital Facilities Plans are adopted, copies of which shall be on file with the Office of the City Clerk, and the Findings and Conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 staff report to City Council, as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Section 5. The 2020 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Map and Text Amendments (CPA20-0005) to the City of Auburn Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in Exhibit "F," and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 transmittal memo to the City Council, as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Section 6. The 2020 annual Comprehensive Plan city-initiated Text Amendments CPA20-0005) to the City of Auburn Land Use Element of the Comprehensive Plan, as set forth in Exhibit "G," and the findings and conclusions outlined in the November 15, 2020 transmittal memo to the City Council, as set forth in Exhibit "A," are adopted. Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 4 Section 7. The adopted Comprehensive Plan as amended is designated as a basis for the exercise of substantive authority under the Washington State Environmental Policy Act by the City's responsible environmental official in accordance with RCW. 43.21 C.060. Section 8. The Mayor is hereby authorized to implement such administrative procedures as may be necessary to carry out the directions of this legislation to include incorporating into one document the adopted Comprehensive Plan map and text amendments set forth in the attached Exhibits when preparing and publishing the amended Comprehensive Plan. Section 9. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the validity of its application to other persons or circumstances. Section 10. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and after its passage, approval and publication as provided by law. INTRODUCED: DEC 0 7 2020 PASSED: DEC 0 7 2020 APPROVED: DEC 0 7 2020 CITY OF AUBURN Nancy Ba s 044 MAYOR Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 5 ATTEST: Shawn Campbell, MMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Kendra Comeau, City Attorney Published: beC,€%\ity I,b1 1h kW, SeA TirngS Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 6 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 7 Exhibit A November 15, 2020 staff report to the City Council for all 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments Memorandum To: City Council Members From: Jeff Tate, Director of Community Development CC: Mayor Nancy Backus Date: November 15, 2020 Re: Ordinance 6803 Exhibit A – Transmittal of Planning Commission Recommendation 2020 Comprehensive Plan Annual Amendments Recommendation: The Planning Commission is pleased to transmit and recommend approval to the Auburn City Council approval of the 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Background Summary: The City of Auburn adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in 1995 in response to the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended. Since then the Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually. At the end of 2015, the City adopted a substantially updated Comprehensive Plan in compliance with state-required periodic updates. Annual Comprehensive plan amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private parties (private-initiated). This year the city is initiating:  Seven sets of policy/text amendments; and  One map amendment Also, the city received:  Two (2) private-initiated plan map amendments; and  One (1) private-initiated policy/text amendment This staff report and Planning Commission recommendation addresses all of this year’s amendments and associated rezones consisting of:  CPA20-0001 & REZ20-0001 (Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPM) #2) a request submitted by the Auburn School District to change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning designation for a 2.19 acre parcel adjacent to Chinook Elementary school.  CPA20-0002 & REZ20-0002 (Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPM) #3) Applications submitted by Westport Capital LLC to change the comprehensive plan land use designation and zoning designations for 37.5 acres of land from a mix of high density (20 dwelling units per acre) and lower density (7 dwelling units per acre) Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 2 of 38 residential designations to a single moderate density (12 dwelling units per acre). Ordinance 6807 is a companion to these amendments and establishes development conditions under a contract rezone.  CPA20-0003 (Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (P/T) #10) An application submitted by the Auburn Adventist Academy to amend Comprehensive Plan policies established under their previously approved Special Plan.  CPA20-0005 (Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments (P/T) #1-6, #8) A series of city initiated amendments to the text and maps contained within the comprehensive plan which includes incorporation of all school district capital facility plans, the city’s capital facilities plan, updates to the transportation element text and maps, and updates to the transportation and land use elements in order to implement the Auburn Airport Master Plan. Ordinance 6803 is a companion to the school district capital facility plans and establishes the school impact fees that are recommended to be implemented in association with the adopted plans. Comprehensive plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs but is not required prior to the end of the year. A. Findings 1. RCW 36.70A.130 (Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides for amendments to locally adopted GMA comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances as provided for in State law and City Code, comprehensive plan amendments shall be considered by the city legislative body no more frequently than once per year. 2. The City of Auburn established a June 5, 2020 deadline for the submittal of private initiated comprehensive plan applications (map or policy/text). Notice to the public of the application submittal deadline was provided on the City’s website, posted, advertised in the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a compiled notification list on May 4, 2020. The City received two (2) private initiated map amendments and one (1) private initiated policy/text amendment by the submittal deadline. 3. The City of Auburn received annual updates to the four (4) school district Capital Facilities Plans whose districts occur within the City of Auburn. These Capital Facilities Plans, as well as the City’s Capital Facilities Plan are proposed to be incorporated by reference in the current Capital Facilities Element (Volume 3), of the 2015 Auburn Comprehensive Plan and are processed as Policy/Text (P/T) amendments. 4. The environmental review decision under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the school district capital facilities plans were prepared separately by each school district acting as their own lead agency, as allowed by State law (State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)). 5. The environmental review under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) for the city initiated amendments, the City Capital Facilities Plan, and the remaining policy/text and map amendments resulted in a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued for the City- Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 3 of 38 initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments on September 23, 2020 (City File # SEP20- 0018). The comment period ended at 5:00 p.m. October 9, 2020 and the appeal period concluded at 5:00 p.m. October 23, 2020. A copy of the DNS and environmental checklist application is provided in the working binder behind the “Environmental Review” tab. No appeal was filed. 6. Auburn City Code (ACC) Chapter 14.22 outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated amendments and the general processing of comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 7. As provided in the City code, the Comprehensive Plan amendments are initially reviewed during a public hearing process before the City of Auburn Planning Commission, who then provides a recommendation to the City Council for final action which generally occurs, but is not required to, prior to the end of the year. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 4 of 38 8. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Department of Commerce for transmittal to other state agencies for the required state review. The Washington State Department of Commerce acknowledged receipt on September 23, 2020 by Submittal ID: # 2020-S-1827. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 9. Due to the nature of policy/text changes, and the minimal amount of private-initiated map amendments, the optional process for holding a public open house as provided for in the city code, was not conducted. 10. Three public notices were provided for two different hearings. Notice of public hearing for two private applications were published on September 15, 2020 (CPA20-0003) and October 19, 2020 (CPA20-0002), respectively, in the Seattle Times Newspaper and on the city website, which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing that took place on November 4, 2020. Notice of public hearing was published on November 7, 2020 (CPA20-0005) in the Seattle Times Newspaper and on the city website which is at least 10 days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing that took place November 17, 2020. Since, there are no city initiated site-specific map changes, only city-wide map changes, the site-specific noticing by mailing by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet was not conducted. 11. The following report identifies Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text (P/T) and Map (CPM) amendments scheduled for introduction and discussion at the City Council Study Session on November 23, 2020. Comprehensive Plan Policy/Text Amendments (File No. CPA20-0005, City initiated) The Planning Commission conducted two hearings on Comprehensive Plan Annual Amendments, consisting of map and policy/text amendments. At the November 17, 2020 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the following set of Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments: P/T #1 Incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Auburn School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) covering from 2020-2026. The CFP was prepared by the District staff and adopted by the Auburn School District School Board of Directors on June 22, 2020 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a Determination of Non- Significance (DNS) prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The amendment is to incorporate the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 5 of 38 The CFP includes the following:  six–year enrollment projections  Auburn school district level of service standards  An inventory of existing facilities  The district’s overall capacity of the 6-year period  District capital construction Plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Auburn School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $6,456.31, a decrease of $449.00 and the requested fee for multiple-family dwellings is $16,325.80, an increase of $1,658.35. As the district recommended, and the city adopted last year, a discount between $2,000 and $10,000 per unit has been included in the request based on the number of bedrooms per multiple-family unit. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the Auburn School District Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 to the City Council. P/T#2 Incorporate the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. . Discussion The Dieringer School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2021 - 2026. The CFP was adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors on August 17, 2020. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The Planning Commission action is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following:  Overview  An inventory of existing facilities  six–year enrollment projections  standard of service  Capacity projects  Finance plan  Impact fee calculations A review of the Dieringer School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $4,176, and the requested fee for multiple family dwellings is $789. Each year, Pierce County Council has “capped” fees Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 6 of 38 throughout Pierce County by a “Maximum Fee Obligation” (MFO) which changes annually based on the Construction Cost Index published by the Engineering News Record. The previous year’s MFO for single family development was $3,815 and the MFO for multi-family development was $2,025. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the Dieringer School District Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026 to the City Council. P/T #3 Incorporate the Federal Way School District 2021 Capital Facilities Plan into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Federal Way School District has provided the City with its annually updated Capital Facilities Plan 2021. The CFP was adopted by the Federal Way School District School Board July 28, 2020. The CFP has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The amendment is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following:  Introduction  Inventory of educational facilities & non-instructional facilities  Needs forecast, existing & new facilities  Six–year finance plan  Maps of district boundaries  Building capacities & portable locations  Student forecast  Capacity summaries  Impact fee calculations  Summary of changes from last year’s plan A review of the Federal Way School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $3,243, representing a decrease of $1,792.00 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $16,003.00, a decrease of $4,765.00. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the Federal Way School District’s 2021 Capital Facilities Plan to the City Council P/T #4 Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 7 of 38 Incorporate the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2020-2021 to 2025-2026 into the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. Discussion The Kent School District has provided its annually updated 2020-2021 to 2025-2026 Capital Facilities Plan. The CFP was adopted by the Kent School District School Board on June 24, 2020 and has been subject to separate SEPA review and a DNS prepared by the District. Information contained in the School District CFP serves as the basis for the City’s collection of school impact fees on behalf of the school district. The amendment is to incorporate the School District Capital Facilities Plan into the City’s Comprehensive Plan by reference. The CFP includes the following:  Executive Summary  Six-year enrollment projection & history  District standard of service  Inventory, capacity & maps of existing schools  Six-year planning & construction plan  Portable classrooms  Projected classroom capacity  Finance Plan, cost basis and impact fee schedules  Summary of changes to previous plan A review of the Kent School District’s updated Capital Facilities Plan indicates the District is requesting a change in the fee obligations. The net fee obligation for single-family dwellings is proposed to be $5,692.85, representing an increase of $138.85 and the requested fee for multi-family dwellings is $2,403.63, an increase of $58.63. Both increases are tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) of 2.5% for the Seattle Metropolitan Area in 2020. The actual impact fees are established by ordinance through subsequent City Council action. Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the Kent School District Capital Facilities Plan 2019-2020 to 2025-2026 to the City Council. P/T #5 Incorporate the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026, into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Discussion A Capital Facilities Plan is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) (RCW 36.70A). The GMA requires that a capital facilities plan include an inventory of existing capital facilities (showing locations and capacities), a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities, and a minimum of a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The proposed City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026 satisfies the GMA requirements for a capital facilities Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 8 of 38 element as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Each comprehensive plan prepared under the GMA must include a capital facilities plan element. More specifically, RCW 36.70A.070(3) of the GMA requires the following: “A capital facilities plan element consisting of: (a) An inventory of existing capital facilities owned by public entities, showing the locations and capacities of the capital facilities; (b) a forecast of the future needs of such capital facilities; (c) the proposed locations and capacities of expanded or new capital facilities; (d) at least a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes; and (e) a requirement to reassess the land use element if probable funding falls short of meeting existing needs and to ensure that the land use element, capital facilities plan element, and financing plan within the capital facilities plan element are coordinated and consistent. Park and recreation facilities shall be included in the capital facilities plan element.” A capital facility is defined as a structure, street or utility system improvement, or other long- lasting major asset, including land. Capital facilities are provided for public purposes. Capital facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: streets, roads, highways, sidewalks, street and road lighting systems, traffic signals, domestic water systems, storm and sanitary sewer systems, parks and recreation facilities, and police and fire protection facilities. These capital facilities include necessary ancillary and support facilities. The City of Auburn 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026 is proposed to be incorporated by reference in the Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Element (Volume No. 3). Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the City of Auburn’s 6-year Capital Facilities Plan 2021-2026 to the City Council. P/T #6 Amend text of Volume 5, Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan. Key Changes/Points: As part of the 2020 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments, the city seeks to change the Comprehensive Plan to update the Transportation Element. The main changes to the Comprehensive Plan document include:  Update Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) information/project list;  Re-designate multiple capital projects from the TIP (funded) to the Comprehensive Plan (unfunded) to maintain continuity in the future transportation network conditions.  Update maps as needed to reflect current data and conditions (addressed by CMP#1, below);  Additional minor changes will relate to grammar, punctuation, choice of words, etc. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 9 of 38 In addition to the strike through and underline in the working binder, a memorandum prepared by Cecile Malik, Senior Transportation Planner, for the Planning Commission is included in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. The memorandum provides a summary of text changes. Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of policy text amendments to Volume 5, Transportation Element of Comprehensive Plan. P/T #8 Volume 1, Land Use Element and Volume 5, Transportation Element (Plan). Discussion Existing comprehensive plan policies do not sufficiently protect the operations of the Auburn Municipal Airport, and do not provide the City sufficient authority to ensure development around the airport is coordinated and consistent with the Airport Master Plan. Policies are proposed for change to:  Protect the operations of the Auburn Municipal Airport (the “airport”);  Prevent or promote incompatible land uses around the airport;  Ensure that development around the airport is coordinated and consistent with the Airport Master Plan;  Protect the airport from nonconforming uses and structures that pose a safety concern to airport operations;  Provide the authority to review the impact of development on air safety;  Are clearly defined and clearly understood, or open to a wide degree of interpretation; or  Use outdated language In addition to the strike through and underline in the working binder, a memorandum prepared by Alexandria D. Teague, Planner II, for the Planning Commission is included in the working binder behind the “Comp. Plan Policy/Text Amendments” tab. The memorandum provides the background and economic impact, external planning considerations, and city’s authority and conclusion regarding the proposed changes. The proposed text amendments are intended to create a stronger connection between the Airport Master Plan and the comprehensive plan, allow for the mitigation of nonconforming uses, standardizing terminology and improving the clarity of policy language, recognizing the significance of the airport for economic development, and discouraging the development of incompatible land uses adjacent to the airport. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of policy text amendments to Volume 1, “Land Use Element” and Volume 5, “Transportation Element (Plan)” to update text for the purpose of reinforcing the airport’s importance to the city as an essential facility within the comprehensive plan. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 10 of 38 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (File No. CPA20-0005), City initiated map changes CPM #1 This proposed amendment updates a number of maps found throughout the city’s Comprehensive Transportation Plan, which is adopted by reference in the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. This is consistent and in conjunction with P/T #6. Discussion (This is the same topic as text amendment P/T #7, but is repeated as a map amendment since it requires revision to both the text and map of the comprehensive plan document. See discussion and analysis under text amendment P/T #6.) Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommend approval of a map amendment to move thirteen (13) maps from the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, adopted as a reference to the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan, into a single appendix (B). Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments (CPA20-0001) and Rezone (REZ20-0001), Private initiated map changes, Chinook Elementary School CPM #2 Volume 1, Land Use Element 1. The Applicant, Camie Anderson of Shockey Planning Group, representing Jeff Grose of the Auburn School District, submitted applications for a Comprehensive Plan map amendment (File No. CPA20-0001) and a related re-zone (File No. REZ20-0001). More specifically, the applications request a change in the designation of King County parcel number 212105- 9042 consisting of approximately 2.19 acres from the current designation of “Multiple- Family” to “Institutional” and a re-zone from “R-20 Residential – Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre” to “P-1 – Public Use District”. The Applicant identifies that this is a non-project action. 2. The Site, comprised of one parcel, is located on the north side of Auburn Way S and approximately 400 feet west of Noble Court SE, addressed as 3440 Auburn Way S. The parcel is identified as King County parcel numbers 212105-9042. 3. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS), the environmental review decision required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for the application by Auburn School District for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Re-zone was applied for under City File No. SEP20-0002 on February 5, 2020. The staff review was completed and a DNS was issued on March 4, 2020. The appeal period expired on April 2, 2020. 4. The public hearing notice was published in the Seattle Times on March 4, 2020, which is at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 17, Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 11 of 38 2020. Public notice was also mailed to property owners of record within 300 feet, posting on- site and on the city’s webpage. 5. The following report identifies a comprehensive plan map amendment and re-zone requested by Auburn School District scheduled for the Planning Commission’s November 17, 2020 public hearing with a staff recommendation. Comprehensive Plan Related Findings 6. The City of Auburn first-adopted amendments to its Comprehensive Plan in compliance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requirements, as amended in 1995. The Auburn Comprehensive Plan has been amended annually each year since generally for housekeeping items and for capital facilities plan coordination. 7. The City of Auburn adopted a substantially revised Comprehensive Plan (including map amendments) in response to periodic updates required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) by Ordinance No. 6584 on December 14, 2015. 8. City Code Section 14.22, “Comprehensive Plan” provides the city’s laws for amending the Comprehensive Plan. Amendments can be initiated by the City of Auburn (city-initiated) and by private citizens (privately-initiated). 9. RCW 36.70A.130 (The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)) provides for annual amendments to locally adopted comprehensive plans. Except in limited circumstances as provided for in State law, Comprehensive Plan amendments shall be considered by the city or county legislative body no more frequently than once per year. The annual limitation and exceptions are also restated in city code at ACC 14.22.060. 10. The City of Auburn established a June 5, 2020 submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments for the year 2020 (map or policy/text amendments). Notice to the public of the application filing deadline was provided on the City’s website, publication of a legal notice the Seattle Times Newspaper, and sent to a notification list of potentially interested parties. 11. Auburn City Code Chapter 14.22, “Comprehensive Plan”, outlines the process for submittal of private initiated amendments and the processing of Comprehensive Plan amendments as follows: “Section 14.22.100 A. The planning commission shall hold at least one public hearing on all proposed amendments to the comprehensive plan. Notice of such public hearing shall be given pursuant to Chapter 1.27 ACC and, at a minimum, include the following: 1. For site-specific plan map amendments: a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within a radius of 300 feet of the proposed map amendment request, not less than 10 calendar days prior to the public hearing; 2. For area-wide plan map amendments: Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 12 of 38 a. Notice shall be published once in the official newspaper of the city not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of public hearing; b. Notice shall be mailed by first class mail to all property owners of record within the area subject to the proposed amendment; c. Notice shall be posted in at least two conspicuous locations in the area subject to the proposed amendment not less than 10 calendar days prior to the date of the public hearing. B. Notwithstanding the above, the director may expand the minimum noticing provisions noted above as deemed necessary. C. Planning Commission Recommendation. The planning commission shall conduct a public hearing on all potential comprehensive plan amendments and shall make and forward a recommendation on each to the city council. The planning commission shall adopt written findings and make a recommendation consistent with those findings to the city council. D. The city council, if it elects to amend the comprehensive plan, shall adopt written findings and adopt said amendments by ordinance. E. State Review. All comprehensive plan amendments considered by the planning commission shall be forwarded for state agency review consistent with RCW 36.70A.106. F. Any appeal of an amendment to the comprehensive plan shall be made in accordance with Chapter 36.70A RCW. (Ord. 6172 § 1, 2008.)” 12. Per Chapter 14.22 Auburn City Code (“ACC”), privately-initiated amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall have at least one public hearing before the Planning Commission who then forward on a recommendation to the City Council. City Council consideration and action on the amendments generally occurs, but is not required, prior to the end of the year. 13. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, the proposed comprehensive plan amendments outlined in this agenda bill were sent to the Washington State Office of Commerce and other state agencies as required for the 60-day state review. No comments have been received from the Washington State Department of Commerce or other state agencies as of the writing of this report. 14. Due to the scope and limited number of privately initiated policy/text changes, the optional process as provided in the city code for a public open house was not conducted. Zoning Code Related Findings 1. In June 2018 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6655 which allows the Planning Commission and City Council to consider associated map changes (for Comp. Plan and Zoning map amendments), concurrently. This eliminates the need for the Hearing Examiner to subsequently consider a zoning map amendment public hearing when it is related to a Comprehensive Plan map amendment. 2. Chapter 18.68 ACC (Zoning) Amendments outlines the process for submittal of privately- initiated zoning amendments and the general processing. Per ACC 18.68.030(B)(1)(b), when the Planning Commission is considering a re-zone (zoning map amendment) which requires a Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map amendment, the public hearings shall be Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 13 of 38 conducted concurrently and a recommendation on both shall be forwarded to the City Council. 3. The intent of the P-1 – Public Use Zone is “…intended to provide for the appropriate location and development of public uses that serve the cultural, educational, recreational, and public service needs of the community.” While not explicitly called out in the current Comprehensive Plan, the P-1 – Public Use Zone is existing in implementation in surrounding parcels occupied by the Chinook Elementary School. The “Institutional” Comprehensive Plan designation is the most closely related comprehensive plan designation to the P-1 – Public Use Zone. Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – Staff Analysis 1. The Applicant submitted a Comprehensive Plan map amendment application on February 05, 2020, before the year 2020 application submittal deadline for comprehensive plan amendments (June 5, 2020). 2. The property owner is Auburn School District No. 408, represented by Jeff Grose, Executive Director of Capital Projects. The applicant is Camie Anderson, Senior Associate of Shockey Planning Group Inc. 3. In addition to the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Application (File No. CPA20-0001) and re-zone application (File No. REZ20-0001), the Applicant also submitted an environmental checklist application (File No. SEP20-0002). 4. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the comprehensive plan map designation of King County parcel number 212105-9042 from the current designation of “Multiple-Family” to “Institutional”. 5. The Applicant also seeks to change the zoning classification of King County parcel numbers 212105-9042 from “R-20 Residential, Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre” to “P-1, Public Use District”. The Applicant identifies in the environmental checklist application that this is a non- project action. 6. As indicated by the Applicant’s narrative statement submitted with the application, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and related rezoning have been requested for the purpose of replacing the existing public elementary school to more closely align with district standards for size and program. 7. The current Comprehensive Plan designation, zoning classification and current land uses of the sites and surrounding properties are as follows: Comprehensive Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 14 of 38 On- Site Multiple-Family R-20 Residential Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre Single-Family Dwelling, Multiple Family Dwellings North “Institutional” P-1, Public Use Elementary School South “Multiple-Family” R-20 Residential Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre Multiple-Family Dwellings East “Institutional” P-1, Public Use Elementary School West “Light Commercial” C-1, Light Commercial Retail Commercial Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 15 of 38 Vicinity Map with Site Outlined N Subject Site Auburn Way S Noble Court SE Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 16 of 38 Process and Criteria for Requested Amendment 8. The Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment application seeks to change the designation of one parcel, King County parcel number 212105-9042. The parcel is located south and west of the existing Chinook Elementary School site, and will be incorporated into a re- development of the existing facility. The parcel is approximately 2.19 acres in size. If approved, the school district will control three contiguous parcels totaling approximately 10.20 acres in size. The property is roughly the shape of a square of approximately 300 feet deep by 320 feet wide. The parcel is currently occupied by a single family house and a multi-family structure. The school district has stated they recently acquired the parcel and have leased the current uses back to the occupants. 9. The site is bordered to the south by Auburn Way S, which is owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation, serving as State Route 164, and classified by the City as a “Principle Arterial” street. The adjacent street is not currently fully developed to the “Principle Arterial” street standards, as there is not sidewalk or vertical curb abutting the property. 10. The property is located within the King County portion of the City of Auburn. Records indicate the annexation of this and surrounding properties occurred in 1959. 11. The City’s Comprehensive Plan contains the following objectives and policy guidance, as it relates to this application: Volume 1 – Land Use Element “Public and Institutional Land Use Designations” “Character Sketch” “Public and institutional uses will occur in both low and high-density environments. For passive uses, land and views will be protected; limited access to these areas will be typical. For more active uses, usability and accessibility will be key features and new development will be subject to standards reflecting programmed space and interconnectivity. These spaces will be varied in type, providing service to areas large and small, urban and more rural in character. Sustainable solutions and innovations that are responsive to the native ecology will be typical of public and institutional uses.” “General Policies” A general policy appropriate to this request is: “Policy LU-89. The primary purpose of this designation is to address public needs while taking advantage of synergies with the adjacent areas where they are sited.” “Institutional Designation” “Description” Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 17 of 38 “The I zone is intended to provide an area wherein educational, governmental, theological, recreational, cultural and other public and quasi-public uses may be allowed to develop. It is further intended these areas be significant in scope which will allow a combination of uses which may not be permitted outright within other zones. This district is not intended to include those smaller or singular public uses which are consistent with and permitted in other zones.” Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed institutional uses; or 2. Located along major arterial streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the single-family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Institutional designation. 5. Properties identified in the Airport Master Plan as Landing Field.” An Institutional-related policy appropriate to this request is: “Policy LU-102 Appropriate uses for this designation include facilities that serve the needs of the larger community such as public schools, active parks; city operated municipal facilities, large churches, and fire stations.” The Capital Facilities Element also contains objectives and policies relevant to the request, as follows: Volume 3 – Capital Facilities Element “Planning Approach” “The Capital Facilities planning approach is to manage growth in a manner that enhances rather than detracts from community quality and values by actively coordinating land use type and intensity with City facility and service development and provision.” “Objectives and Policies” “Objective 1.1. Ensure that new development does not outpace the City’s ability to provide and maintain adequate public facilities and services, by allowing new development to occur only when and where adequate facilities exist or will be provided, and by encouraging development types and locations that can support the public services they require.” “Policy CF-3. Development shall be allowed only when and where such development can be adequately served by public services (police and fire) without reducing the level of service elsewhere.” “Objective 1.2. To ensure that new developments are supported by an adequate level of public services through an effective system of public facilities.” Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 18 of 38 “Policy CF-10. Public facilities shall be provided in accord with the guidance of the Capital Facilities Plan or, as may be appropriate a system plan for each type of facility designed to serve at an adequate level of service the locations and intensities of uses specified in this Comprehensive Plan.” “Objective 1.8. To site public and institutional buildings in accord with their service function and the needs of the members of the public served by the facility.” “Policy CF-63. Public and institutional facilities that attract a large number of visitors (City Hall, museums, libraries, educational facilities, permit and license offices, health and similar facilities, etc.) should be sited in areas that are accessible (within ¼ mile) by transit.” 12. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan document is to provide a policy basis for the zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent as required by the following city code provision: “ACC 14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan. “ 13. The City code provides certain criteria for decision-making for comprehensive plan amendments as follows: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region.” Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 19 of 38 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The City Code provides certain criteria for decisions on amending the Comprehensive Plan under ACC 18.14.22.110. These criteria are listed below in bold, followed by a Staff Analysis. 1. The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. Staff analysis: As discussed above, the subject properties are adjacent to an existing elementary school, multi-family housing, and light commercial properties. The property has been acquired for the purpose of replacing the existing elementary school, with the intent of more closely matching the district’s standards for size and program. The site is served by public infrastructure, including a “principle arterial” street to the south. Due to the adjacent ownership and redevelopment program identified in the applicant’s application, secondary access to the redeveloped site is available via Noble Court SE to the east. The proposal to change the mapped land use designation of the site from “Multiple-Family” to “Institutional” is supported by numerous Comprehensive Plan policies within both the Land Use Element and the Capital Facilities Element, as noted above. The proposal to change the land use designation on the site to institutional will not be in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Since it allows for a public facility to meet the needs of the community, adequate public facilities will be provided concurrent with the development to serve the future redevelopment of the site. Public transit is available within ½ mile of the site. 2. The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. Staff analysis: The applications for a change in Comprehensive Plan designation and zoning have been reviewed by Valley Regional Fire Agency and the City Utilities and Traffic divisions. Based on these reviews, the changes would not adversely affect the provision of services. The proposed Comprehensive Plan map change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the city, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. Therefore, it is not anticipated that approval of the request negatively affects provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements would be required to support the development Existing services either exists or can be provided to support the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to change the site’s map designation from “Multiple-Family” to “Institutional”. 3. The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff analysis: While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the zoning designation of R-20 does not permit educational facilities. Amending the site’s land use classification to Institutional provides the opportunity to re-zone the site and allow the replacement of an existing public elementary school. Policy number LU-4 in Volume 1 of the city’s comprehensive plan states that “Public and institutional uses may be permitted as a Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 20 of 38 conditional use if designed in a manner that enhances the residential character of the area.” The land use designation change and re-zone support the comprehensive plan’s intent to allow compatible services in and adjacent to residential zones. 4. The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff analysis: There has been a change in conditions that generates the need for the map change. At the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan, the school district had not identified nor purchased the land necessary to meet state and district goals for attendance and facility needs. With the continued population growth and a shortage of suitable sites for the construction of new facilities, the public benefit of the proposal supports the proposed change. 5. The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. Staff analysis: The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The proposal is consistent because it provides land suitable for institutional development, which will directly provide services (educational) to the immediate community within an urban area. 6. The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff analysis: The proposed land use designation is compatible with surrounding land uses per policy LU-4 meeting criteria B, and the residential growth and demand for educational facilities and availability of land has caused a change in condition that meets criteria C. RE-ZONE RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: While the City of Auburn does not have re-zone criteria adopted, the following criteria are analyzed to ensure that the proposed re-zone is consistent with Washington State case law. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 21 of 38 1. The intent of the zoning code and the comprehensive plan of the City. Is the re-zone consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? Staff analysis: As provided at ACC 18.35.020, “Intent of Special Purpose Zones”, the intent of the “P-1 – Public Use Zone” is: “The P-1 zone is intended to provide for the appropriate location and development of public uses that serve the cultural, educational, recreational, and public service needs of the community.” The P-1 - Public Use Zone is in effect on the adjacent parcels. While the P-1 – Public Use Zone is no longer an implementing zone within the “Institutional” Comprehensive Plan designation, the submitted P-1 rezone request meets the intent of providing a public good while allowing future construction of improvements on a single campus with uniform zoning. Provided that the concurrent Comprehensive Plan map amendment is granted, changing the site’s current “Multiple-Family” designation to “Institutional”, the proposed re-zone from “R-20” to “P-1” will be consistent with and implement the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use of the site as a public school is consistent with the “P-1” Public Use Zone intent statement. 2. The availability of municipal services such as water, sewer, roads, fire and police protection, which might be required by reason of the proposed re-zone. Staff analysis: As previously noted in the Comprehensive Plan map amendment analysis, adequate services will be provided to the site, including water, sewer, roads, and fire and police protection. 3. The conditions of the area have substantially changed. Staff analysis: As previously noted in the Comprehensive Plan map amendment analysis, the conditions of the area have substantially changed since development of the site. Through the continued urbanization of the surrounding area and a reduction in maximum class size requirements for elementary schools statewide, it is evident that the conditions of the area have substantially changed. 4. The proposed re-zone bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, and welfare. Staff analysis: The proposed re-zone from “R-20” to “P-1” bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, and welfare in that it will allow a site to be included with the existing Chinook Elementary School site, a necessary public facility in need of being redeveloped to meet current community needs. During the redevelopment of the site, the project will be required to meet all local zoning, building, and other requirements currently established by the City. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of the Auburn School District No. 408 (CPA20- 0001) request for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment to change the map designation of one parcel, Parcel No. 212105-9042 from “Multiple-Family” to “Institutional” and to re-zone the Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 22 of 38 parcel from “R-20, Residential Zone - Twenty Dwelling Units per Acre” to “P-1, Public Use” zoning district. EXHIBIT LIST (For exhibits, please see behind the “Comp. Plan Map Amendments” tab in the ‘working binder’.) Exhibit 1 Staff Report CPA20-0001 & REZ20-0001 Exhibit 2 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment – Proposed Change Exhibit 3 Zoning Map Amendment – Proposed Change Exhibit 4 Completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Re-zone Application forms and materials including Applicant’s Narrative Statement Exhibit 5 Completed SEPA Environmental Checklist Application SEP20-0002 Exhibit 6 Combined Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance SEP20-0002 Exhibit 7 Dept. of Commerce 60-Day Acknowledgement Letter Exhibit 8 Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 9 Affidavits of Publication, Mailing, and Posting At the November 4, 2020 public hearing, the Planning Commission considered the following set of Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment (File No. CPA20-0003), Private initiated text changes P/T #10 Volume 1, Land Use Element, Auburn Adventist Academy Special Planning Area Discussion 1. Agent, Alison Moss with Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, representing Bob Sanders of Creations Northwest LLC, submitted an application for a Comprehensive Plan Text amendment (File No. CPA20-0003). More specifically, the purpose of the text amendment is the amend Land Use Policy LU-135 and Academy Special Planning Area policies A.1.2 and A.1.8. The purpose of the amendments is to clarify that multifamily uses providing long- term revenue to the Western Conference of the Seventh Day Adventists supporting its educational mission are allowed. The Applicant identifies that this is a non-project action. 2. The applicant proposes to develop a portion of the Academy’s property with a combination of multi-family, memory care, independent living, and assisted living residential units. An illustrative site plan was provided with the application. The plan is marked as Exhibit 7 in the planning commission staff report. 3. Any future development of the site will be analyzed separately from the subject Comprehensive Plan Text amendment for consistency with local, state, and federal regulations, including the Auburn City Code (ACC) and Public Works Design Manual. 4. The site abuts Auburn Way South, between 32nd Street SE & Academy Drive SE. While the Academy occupies multiple parcels within this area, the proposed text amendment is Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 23 of 38 primarily associated with King County Parcel Numbers 2721059117, 2721059090, 2721059055, 2721059086, and 2721059079. 5. The Auburn Adventist Academy is a multi-use campus located on approximately 250 acre property owned and operated by the Western Conference of the Seventh Day Adventists. It play a large role in Washington Conference. It is designated on Comprehensive Plan Map 1.4 as an Adopted Area, a category of Special Planning Area. The City Council adopted the Academy Special Planning Area Plan (Academy Plan) by Resolution No. 2254, in 1991. 6. According to the applicant, in the earlier years, agriculture was the way the Academy supported the school financially. Agricultural uses and products included orchards, crops, berries, a large dairy farm. See Exhibit 3 to the planning commission staff report. 7. According to the applicant, in 1987, the City established the Institutional Use District (I) for Auburn Adventist Academy (Academy). The I Zone permitted such uses as schools, day care, churches, nursing homes, recreation and single family uses outright. It authorized other uses, including multifamily dwellings, through administrative or conditional use permits. The City Council rezoned the Academy Planning Area “I” as part of its adoption of the Academy Plan. 8. According to the owner, (the Academy), its mission is to continuously create a strong private Christian education that is academically significant, while providing whole life development, personal reliance, and personal accountability. Pursuing this mission requires extensive programing, staffing, and facilities that are maintained on its 250+ acres. Only approximately one-third of the Academy’s operating income comes from student tuition. Over many years the governance of the Academy has sought ways to be better stewards of the Academy properties by creating income from the parcels not occupied by the church and school facilities (Supporting Parcels) to fund its mission. See Exhibit 3 to the planning commission staff report. 9. The applicant provided a Traffic Impact Analysis Scoping Document, prepared by Heath and Associates, Inc., dated August 25, 2020. The analysis identifies how traffic impacts will be analyzed in the future should the site subject to the text amendments be developed. A more detailed Traffic Impact Analysis will be prepared once the specific design of the site is determined, at which point, specific mitigation (if any) will be determined. The applicant’s Traffic Impact Analysis Scoping Document is marked as Exhibit 6 to the planning commission staff report. 10. The applicant provided a Critical Areas Assessment, prepared by Habitat Technologies, dated July 9, 2019. The assessment notes that there is one, approx. 0.25 acre, Category IV wetland within the area associated with the Comprehensive Text Amendment. Any future impacts to wetlands or other critical areas will be reviewed as part of the project specific SEPA review for the site. The Critical Areas Assessment is marked as Exhibit 5 to the planning commission staff report. 11. A Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) the environmental review decision required under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), for a Comprehensive Plan Text Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 24 of 38 Amendment was issued under City File No. SEP20-0012 on September 15, 2020. The comment period ended September 30, 2020 and the appeal period ended October 14, 2020. 12. No comment letters from the surrounding neighborhood were received by the City in response to the combined public Notice of Application and DNS. 13. The public hearing notice was published on September 15, 2020 in the Seattle Times at least 10-days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for November 4, 2020. Public notice was also mailed to property owners of record within 300 feet, posting on-site and on the city’s webpage. 14. The City’s Comprehensive Plan contains the following objectives and policy guidance, as it relates to this application: Volume 1 – Land Use Element “Public and Institutional Land Use Designations” “Character Sketch” “Public and institutional uses will occur in both low and high-density environments. For passive uses, land and views will be protected; limited access to these areas will be typical. For more active uses, usability and accessibility will be key features and new development will be subject to standards reflecting programmed space and interconnectivity. These spaces will be varied in type, providing service to areas large and small, urban and more rural in character. Sustainable solutions and innovations that are responsive to the native ecology will be typical of public and institutional uses.” “General Policies LU-89. The primary purpose of this designation is to address public needs while taking advantage of synergies with the adjacent areas where they are sited. LU-90. Innovative strategies to integrate the uses and sites into the areas where they are sited is encouraged. These strategies should maximize use of the site while minimizing fiscal impacts and impacts to adjacent areas.” “Institutional Designation” Description” “This category includes those areas that are reserved for public or institutional uses. These public uses include public schools and institutional uses such as large churches and schools. It is also intended to include those of a significant impact, and not those smaller public uses that are consistent with and may be included in another designation. For example, public uses of an industrial character are included in the industrial designation, and small-scale religious institutions of a residential character are included in the residential designation” “Designation Criteria Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 25 of 38 1. Previously developed institutional uses; or 2. Located along major arterial streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the single-family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Institutional designation. 5. Properties identified in the Airport Master Plan as Landing Field.” “Policies LU-101. A responsible management entity and the purpose for the institutional designation should be identified for each property interest within this designation. Management policies and plans are appropriate for all lands in this designation. LU-102. Appropriate uses for this designation include facilities that serve the needs of the larger community such as public schools, active parks, city operated municipal facilities, large churches, and fire stations 15. The City code provides certain criteria for decision-making for private comprehensive plan amendment applications as follows: “ACC 14.22.110 Decision criteria for plan amendments. A. The comprehensive plan was developed and adopted after significant study and public participation. The principles, goals, objectives and policies contained therein shall be granted substantial weight when considering a proposed amendment. Therefore, the burden of proof for justifying a proposed amendment rests with the applicant, who must demonstrate that the request complies with and/or relates to the following decision criteria: 1. The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent; 2. Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased; 3. Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid; 4. A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment; 5. If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region CONCLUSIONS The City Code provides certain criteria for decisions on amending the Comprehensive Plan under ACC 14.22.110. These criteria are listed below in bold, followed by a Staff Analysis. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 26 of 38 7. ACC 14.22.110(A)(1) The first criterion is that the change must further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. Staff Analysis: As identified in the submittal information, the Applicant’s purpose for the Comprehensive Plan text amendment is to clarify that multi-family uses providing long-term revenue to the Western Conference of the Seventh Day Adventists supporting its educational mission are allowed. The applicant notes that when the site was originally zoned “I” Institutional and when the Academy Special Planning Area was established, multi- family was a use that was permitted. The proposal to change the text of LU-135 and Academy Special Planning Area Policies A.1.2 and A.1.8 is meant to add further clarity that multi-family and similar uses will support the Academy’s long term mission and are permitted. Because the Academy Special Planning area Policy A.1.8 currently indicates that ‘residential and nursing home uses’ are allowed within the area immediately to the north of Auburn Way South and that multi-family uses are allowed within the Institutional zoning district, the goals and objectives of the comprehensive plan will remain internally consistent. 8. ACC 14.22.110(A)(2) The second decision criterion is that the comprehensive plan amendment must not diminish or increase the ability to provide adequate services. Staff Analysis: The application for changes to the Comprehensive Plan text policies have been reviewed by Valley Regional Fire Agency and the City Utilities and Traffic divisions. Based on these reviews, the changes would not adversely affect the provision of services. The proposed Comprehensive Plan text change by itself, if approved will not affect the ability to provide adequate services. As typical with development in the City, the infrastructure improvements needed to support the development would be the responsibility of the future development. At the time of development, adequate services would be required to be provided concurrent with the development in order for the project to be authorized. As such, it is not anticipated that approval of the request will negatively affect the provision of services. Utility and street frontage improvements, and possibly off-site improvements, would be required to support the development. 9. ACC 14.22.110(A)(3) The third decision criterion is that the assumptions on which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff Analysis: While the policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid, the current text amendment attempts to clarify existing policies and how they integrate with the Academy’s long-term mission. The intent of the Academy is to continue their operation as a religious and educational institution offering vocational training. By amending the text policies to clarify that multi-family and senior housing type uses are allowed, the Academy will have the financial means to continue to operate. 10. ACC 14.22.110(A)(4) The fourth decision criterion is that there has been a change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 27 of 38 Staff Analysis: There has been a change in circumstances that generates the need for the text amendment. According to the Applicant, the original agricultural uses associated with the site are no longer economically viable, the surrounding area has become considerably more urban, and water and sewer infrastructure has greatly improved near the site. Further, the region is experiencing a higher demand for affordable housing and senior housing options. By making updates and refinements to the Academy Special Area Plan, the Academy will be able to utilize multiple under-utilized parcels in a manner that will help them continue to operate and carry out their mission of providing religious and vocational related instruction. Based on this information, it is necessary for the Academy to make updates to the Comprehensive Plan and the Academy Special Planning Area. 11. ACC 14.22.110(A)(5) The fifth decision criterion is that the change must be determined to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of the relevant county and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. Staff Analysis: The change if approved would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A), the Countywide Planning Policies of King County and “Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region”. The proposal is consistent because it intends to clarify existing policies without materially changing them. Further, the existing Institutional Comprehensive Plan Map designation and Institutional zoning will remain. 12. ACC 14.22.110(A)(6) The sixth decision criterion, applies only to changes of the mapped land use designation of a specific property, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: d. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; e. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; f. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff Analysis: Because no Comprehensive Plan map change is proposed, the above criterion is not applicable. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommended approval of a text amendment to land use policy LU-135 and to the Academy Special Planning Area policies A.1.2 and A.1.8. EXHIBIT LIST (As listed within original staff report to the Planning Commission hearing November 4, 2020) Exhibit 1 Staff Report Exhibit 2 Completed Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application Form Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 28 of 38 Exhibit 3 Applicant’s Narrative Statement Exhibit 4 SEPA Environmental Checklist Exhibit 5 Critical Areas Assessment, Habitat Technologies Exhibit 6 Traffic Impact Analysis (Scoping Document), Heath & Associates Exhibit 7 Illustrative Site Plan Exhibit 8 Combined Notice of Application and Determination of Non-Significance SEP20- 0012 Exhibit 9 Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 10 Affidavits of Publication, Mailing, and Posting Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment (CPA20-0002, Private initiated text changes) and Rezone (zoning map amendment REZ20-0002) CPM #3 Volume 1, Land Use Element, Westport Capital LLC Land Use Change and Rezone Discussion 1. David Toyer with Toyer Strategic Investments, acting as Agent on behalf Rick Hathaway with Westport Capital Investments, Owner, submitted applications for a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Rezone. The request is to change the Comprehensive Plan Map Land Use Designation of 6 parcels totaling approx. 37.1 acres to “Moderate Family Residential” from “Multi-Family” and “Single Family Residential” and associated rezone the properties to “R-16, Residential 16 Dwelling Units per Acre (with conditions)”. 2. The proposal consists of six adjacent parcels located on the east side of ‘I’ St. NE at 40th St. NE. King Co. Parcel Nos. King Co. Parcel Nos. 000420-0003, 000420-0013, 000420-0019, 000420-0022, 000420-0024, and 000420-0025. 3. Pursuant to Chapter 197-11 WAC and Chapter 16.06 ACC, this proposal is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (“SEPA”) decision. A Determination of Non-Significance (“DNS”), for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and Rezone request was issued under City File No. SEP20-0006 on October 19, 2020; with the comment period ending on November 3, 2020 and an appeal period ending on November 17, 2020. 4. The public hearing notice was published on October 19, 2020 in the Seattle Times newspaper, at least 10 days prior to this November 4, 2020 Planning Commission public hearing. Public notice was also mailed to property owners within 300 feet and those requesting said notice, posting on the City’s website, and posting at four locations on the subject properties (on the ‘I’ St. NE frontage, and at the termini of ‘l’ St. NE, ‘O’ Pl. NE, and ‘R’ St. NE along the northern property lines). 5. This Staff Report and recommendation describes and addresses a Comprehensive Plan map amendment and rezone request by Westport Capital Investments. The other private initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment applications, as well as the 2020 City initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendments are addressed in separate staff reports. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 29 of 38 6. Two comments were submitted, summarized as follows. Please see Exhibit 15 to the planning commission staff report for the full text of the comments and Staff’s response. a. Earl Weaver, The River Mobile Home Park – concerns about any potential flood mitigation along with future development. Staff Response: Staff provided Mr. Weaver with information regarding any future development will need to meet the City’s floodplain regulations. b. Melissa Child, ‘I’ Pl. NE Resident – concerns about impacts to the wetlands and wildlife habitat, traffic impacts, and that the housing will just be more apartments. Staff Response: Staff provided Ms. Child with information on the presence of wetlands, that there will likely be traffic impacts that will need to be addressed, and that a condition of the Rezone would be a limit to the number of apartment units and would require a mix of housing types. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT – STAFF ANALYSIS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment seeks to change the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Designation of a total of six parcels to “Moderate Density Residential”. Three of the parcels (000420-0025, 000420-0019, and 000420-0013) are currently “Multiple-Family Residential” totaling approx. 5.3 acres. The other three parcels (000420-0022, 000420- 0024, and 000420-0003) are currently “Single Family Residential” totaling approx. 31.8 acres. The three parcels total approximately 1.89 acres. See Exhibit 10 of the planning commission staff report and the following vicinity map: Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 30 of 38 2. The Applicant has supplied narratives for the Comprehensive Plan amendment and the Rezone request applications (See Exhibits 4 and 5 of the planning commission staff report ). At this time there is no specific construction project planned for the property if the requests are approved. 3. As shown in the table below and the following map, the surrounding properties have varying degrees of development. The area to the north contains existing single-family residences (“Monterey Park” subdivision, formerly “Auburn 40”, approved as a planned unit development (PUD)) on small lots (~3,500 sq.-ft. lots), the property to the south is vacant (owned by the Auburn School District), to the east is owned by King County for open space / recreation, across ‘I’ St. NE to the west is developed commercial land, and northwest of the Site and east of ‘I’ St. NE is three large single-family lots with existing residences as well as 3 lots zoned R-20 (“Labrador Rezone” from 2018). 4. The current Comprehensive Plan Land Use designation, zoning classification, and current land uses of the subject properties and surrounding properties are as follows: Comp Plan Designation Zoning Classification Existing Land Use Site “Multiple-Family Residential” and “Single Family Residential” R-20, Residential and R-7, Residential Vacant North “Multiple-Family Residential” and “Single Family Residential” PUD and R-20, Residential Single family homes South “Single Family Residential” R-7, Residential Vacant East “Single Family Residential” R-7, Residential Vacant, Green River Trail Monterey Park Subdivision, approx. 3,500 sq.-ft. lots. Subject Properties Vacant ASD Property Approx. 6,000 sq.- ft. lots. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 31 of 38 West “Heavy Commercial”, “Multiple Family Residential”, and “Single Family Residential” C-3, Heavy Commercial, R-7, Residential, and R-20, Residential Commercial and Manufacturing Uses, Vacant, and Single family homes See Exhibit 10 of the planning commission staff report for maps showing the existing and requested Comprehensive Plan Designation and Zoning Classification. 5. The two western-most of the six parcels front onto ‘I’ St. NE which is classified as a ‘Minor Arterial’ street. ‘L’ St. NE, ‘O’ Pl. NE, and ‘R’ St. NE, which are all “Local” classified streets, and all end at the northern boundary of the site. These roadways, which were constructed along with the development of Monterey Park, were designed to be continued into this Site; upon future development one or all of these roadways will be extended into and through this Site. The existing R-20-zoned areas where approved under City Ordinance No. 4299, which required 40th St. NE to be extended into the Site to the eastern boundary of the R-20-zoned area. A condition of this Rezone will include extension of 40th through the Site to provide a connection, or multiple connections, into the Monterey Park subdivision. This is also required for emergency vehicle access which requires a secondary access when the number of dwelling units reaches 30 single family units or 100 multi-family units. 6. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) (Exhibit 6 of the planning commission staff report) was prepared to analyze the difference between the existing zoning and if the entire Site was rezoned to R-20 (which was the initial request by the Applicant, and later revised). As there is no development proposal at this time, the TIA looked at “worst case” scenarios of the map changes. Under this scenario the Level of Service (LOS) at the intersection of ‘I’ St. NE and 40th St. NE would require intersection improvements upon future development. What improvements will be required is not known at this time since there is no development proposed, so a general condition will be included with the Ordinance. 7. The Site is located within the City of Auburn water service boundaries. It is anticipated that there will be adequate water service upon future development, with any development responsible for extending water service to and through the Site, consistent with the Title 13 ACC and the City of Auburn Engineering Design Standards. 8. The Site is located within the City of Auburn sewer service boundaries. There is an existing sewer pump station that was constructed along with the Monterey Park subdivision to the north that was designed to serve this Site based on the existing zoning. A sewer pump station capacity analysis was submitted (Exhibit 11 of the planning commission staff report) to analyze if upgrades to the pump station would be required if the rezone was approved, which there would be. This study was based off of the initial request of increased units under the R-20 zone, however, is still applicable to the revised request. What upgrades are needed to the pump station would be determined upon any future development proposals. A condition will be included with the rezone Ordinance addressing future upgrades. 9. A Critical Areas Memorandum (Exhibit 12 of the planning commission staff report) was prepared and shows a wetland along the southern border of a portion of the Site extending off-site and another north/west of the Site adjacent to ‘I’ St. NE. The Memo shows the wetland to the south as a “Category II” and the northern wetland as a “Category III”. Upon Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 32 of 38 future development a full Critical Areas Report, consistent with Ch. 16.10 ACC, will be required. For reference, see the following image: 10. There is a portion of the eastern area of the Site that is shown on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) as being located within the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and the 500-Year Flood Hazard Area. Upon future development appropriate studies and possible floodplain permits will be required, consistent with Ch. 15.68 ACC. For reference, see the following image: 11. The purpose of the City’s Comprehensive Plan is to provide a policy basis for potential zoning changes to ensure that the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance are consistent, as required by the following City Code provision: Subject Properties SFHA 500-YR Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 33 of 38 “14.22.050 Conformance and consistency. The zoning, land division and other development codes contained or referenced within Auburn City Code shall be consistent with and implement the intent of the comprehensive plan. Capital budget decisions shall be made in conformity with the comprehensive plan.” COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RELATED – CONCLUSIONS: The City Code provides certain criteria for decisions on amending the Comprehensive Plan under ACC 14.22.110. These criteria are listed below in bold, followed by a Staff Analysis. The Applicant’s responses to these criteria are included in Exhibits 4 and 5 of the planning commission staff report. 1. ACC 14.22.110(A)(1): The proposed change will further and be consistent with the goals and objectives of the plan and the plan will remain internally consistent. Staff Analysis: The Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Element, Page LU-9) provides the following explanation for the “Moderate Family Residential” Land Use Designation: “Moderate Family Designation Description Moderate Density Residential designated areas are planned to accommodate a variety of residential dwelling types. Varying intensities may be permitted to provide a transition between single-family residential and other more intensive uses or activities (such as arterial streets) based on adjacent density, intensity, and/or character. Appropriate densities in these areas generally range from 7 up to 20 dwelling units per acre. Dwelling types generally range from single-family dwelling to multiple-family dwellings, with larger structures allowed (within the density range) where offsetting community benefits can be identified. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed moderate-density residential areas; or 2. Areas that provide a transition between single-family and multifamily, single-family and nonresidential, multifamily and nonresidential zones or development that are adjacent and meet the development parameters of the Moderate Density Residential designation. Implementing Zoning Designations Residential Transition R-10 Residential (Ten Dwelling Units Per Acre) R-16 Residential (Sixteen Dwelling Units Per Acre) Policies LU-19 Density bonuses and flexible development standards should be considered an incentive for innovative neighborhood design. LU-20 Carefully developed low-intensity office, or residentially related commercial uses (such as day care centers) can be compatible. Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 34 of 38 LU-21 Accessory dwelling units should play an integral part of promoting infill development and affordable housing and are therefore encouraged within this land use category..” Per ACC 18.23.030(G), the intent of the R-16, Residential zoning district is: “…intended to provide for medium density multiple-family residential development as designated in the comprehensive plan, and is further intended as a residential zone of single, duplex and multiple-family residences, except as specifically provided elsewhere in this chapter.” As identified in the R-16 zone intent statement above, this zoning district is geared toward allowing a wide range of housing types including detached single-family homes and apartments. Also allowed are uses such as mixed-use projects, nursing homes, etc. The full list of uses allowed within the R-16 zone is attached as Exhibit 13 of the planning commission staff report. Although no specific use is proposed at this time, any future development will be governed by the codes and standards in place at that time. As shown and discussed above, there is an existing small-lot residential subdivision (Monterey Park, formerly ‘Auburn Forty”) to the north and vacant Auburn School District property to the south. As noted in Designation Criteria 2 of “Moderate Density Residential” above, this designation is intended to provide a transition between single-family areas and higher intensity uses. Although there is not an existing school, the property to the south may eventually develop as a school and development on this site would provide that transition. To ensure the transition is adequately implemented, all apartment housing (rental) will be limited to the southern half of the Site, allowing for the more ownership-style housing located next to the existing single-family subdivision to the north (Monterey Park). The existing single-family subdivision to the southwest of the site will be bordered on the north by the future extension of 40th St. NE. The proposed Rezone conditions include limits on the number of apartment units to ensure the entire site is not built-out as apartment buildings. Other conditions are proposed to require “for sale” units and promote greater diversity of unit types that are in the range between single-family detached housing and mid to high-rise apartment buildings and includes duplexes, townhomes, and other smaller scale multi-unit buildings. The greater diversity is a goal in the city’s Comprehensive Plan. The City has had many large apartment projects over the last several years, including the Copper Gate development currently under construction to the northwest of this Site with 500 apartment units. The type of development that the City hasn’t seen are projects that allow for housing ownership. This type of housing can be in many forms, such as single-family detached, but also in the form of townhomes or stacked multi-unit buildings (stacked referring to each unit being wholly contained on one floor). The Applicant has provided some drawings of what type of housing developers he has been in contact for this Site, those are attached as Exhibit 14 of the planning commission staff report. Note that these are included just for reference and do not represent actual development proposals associated with this Project. In the Comprehensive Plan Housing Element, there are several housing objectives that promote potential greater diversity of unit types and ownership that this project would help to Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 35 of 38 implement. These include (summarized from Exhibit 5 of the planning commission staff report – Housing Objectives and Tools, Page H-10 of the Comprehensive Plan): - Promote housing ownership through single-family dwellings on small lots, cottages, and townhomes. - Allow for a variety of housing types by way of encouraging multiplexes, cottages, townhomes, and small lot single-family dwellings - Increase ownership opportunities for lower-income households by potentially allowing for incentives such as permit and impact fee waivers. Housing Element Goals and Policies No. H-11 also further spells out the need for home ownership opportunities: “Promote opportunities for home ownership through single-family detached and semi- attached housing, fee-simple cottages and townhouses, and condominium apartments.” These types of housing units would not be allowed in the existing R-7 zoned areas (though would in the R-20). Changing the Comprehensive Plan designation and Zoning classification to R-16, as conditioned, would not be out of character with the surrounding properties and would potentially provide further consistency with several goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The requested Comprehensive Plan amendment will remain internally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan through approval / adoption of the associated conditional (contract) Rezone request. 2. ACC 14.22.110(A)(2): Whether the capacity to provide adequate services is diminished or increased. Staff Analysis: The proposed application for a change in the Comprehensive Plan designation has been reviewed by the City’s Utilities, Traffic division, and the Valley Regional Fire Authority. Based on these reviews, the change would potentially adversely affect the provision of services, specifically Sewer and Traffic. As is typical with development in the City, adequate infrastructure improvements will be required to be provided by the developer concurrent with future development. As discussed under Conclusions, above, the existing sewer pump station located within the Monterey Park (formerly, Auburn 40) subdivision was designed to serve this Site at its current zoning densities. The Applicant commissioned a study to determine if the pump station would have upgrades required if the zoning density increased, and it would. A condition of the rezone will be that any future developments will need to analyze the system again and determine the necessary upgrades. Also as discussed under Conclusions, above, the intersection of ‘I’ St. NE and 40th St. NE would fall below the LOS minimum established in the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan which for this portion of the ‘I’ Street corridor would be LOS D which is Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 36 of 38 defined as: “LOS D borders on the range in which small increases in the number of vehicles may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to poor progression through the signalized intersections along a corridor, inappropriate signal timing, high traffic volumes, or a combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of FFS [free-flow speeds].” Based on the existing zoning, this intersection would operate at LOS E upon development, and with the proposed zoning it would operate at LOS F, which would require improvements to the intersection (such as a roundabout or traffic signal). The detailed analysis is included in Exhibit 6 of the planning commission staff report . Note that the TIA is based off of the initial request which was for a change of the entire site to R-20, which the Applicant has since revised. The TIA was not required to be updated since the overall impacts will be lower. Also, project-specific TIA(s) will be required for future development(s). In addition to the future intersection deficiencies, adequate right-of-way (ROW) to connect the eastern end of Monterey Park through this Site to ‘I’ St. NE will be required, as conditioned below, and as discussed under Conclusions, above. The Condition for ROW dedication for the Rezone Ordinance will be general enough to provide the City Engineer with discretion to ensure all potential impacts are able to be addressed with any future development proposal(s). 3. ACC 14.22.110(A)(3): Assumptions upon which the comprehensive plan is based are found to be invalid. Staff Analysis: The policies of the Comprehensive Plan are not invalid. As discussed under Criterion #1, above, the Comprehensive Plan seeks to promote the types of housing that would be possible under the Moderate Density Residential Land Use Designation. The Applicant’s request to change six parcels to Moderate Density Residential is not out of character with the designations or uses in the immediate vicinity. The requested change is a logical request based on these existing surrounding uses and land use designations, and as discussed throughout this Staff Report, as conditioned. 4. ACC 14.22.110(A)(4): A determination of change or lack of change in conditions or circumstances has occurred since the adoption of the latest amendment to the specific section of the comprehensive plan that dictates the need for a proposed amendment. Staff Analysis: There have been changes in circumstances since the current land use designations were applied. The principal change would be the lack of affordable housing along with the lack of access to affordable home ownership throughout not only Auburn but in King County. The requested change to “Moderate Density Residential” and ‘R-16 zone”, as conditioned, provides the opportunity for home ownership for those with living wage incomes as conditioned. 5. ACC 14.22.110(A)(5): If applicable, a determination that a question of consistency exists between the comprehensive plan and Chapter 36.70A RCW, the countywide Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 37 of 38 planning policies for either King and/or Pierce County, as appropriate, and Vision 2040: Growth and Transportation Strategy for the Puget Sound Region. Staff Analysis: The change, if approved, would continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), the King County Countywide Planning Policies and Vision 2040. The proposal is consistent because upon future development it will provide land suitable for residential development and is focusing on providing higher-density housing on existing urban lands that are located near transit corridors. 6. ACC 14.22.110(A)(6): If the request is to change the land use designation of a specific property on the comprehensive plan land use map, the applicant must demonstrate one of the following: a. The current land use designation was clearly made in error or due to an oversight; b. The proposed land use designation is adjacent to property having a similar or compatible designation, or other conditions are present to ensure compatibility with surrounding properties; c. There has been a change in conditions since the current land use designation came into effect. Staff Analysis: The requested change is consistent with Item b in that adjacent parcels have similar land use designations. Specifically, the area to the north (Monterey Park) is a Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was developed with detached single-family dwellings on small (~3,500 sq.-ft.) lots as well as some duplex-style buildings on fee simple lots in the northwest portion of the subdivision. The area to the south is zoned R-7, although owned by the Auburn School District so residential development is unlikely, and to the southwest is an existing single-family neighborhood. The properties to the east are owned by the King County River and Floodplain Management Section and contain the Green River Trail, and therefore are not likely to be developed. To the west of the site is existing R-20 zoning and three single-family homes on large lots. Further west, across ‘I’ St. NE is designated Heavy Commercial and contains uses such as office and manufacturing uses. Planning Commission Recommendation Planning Commission recommends approval of a map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map 1.1, Land Use Designation, changing the land use designation for parcels 000420-0013, 00420-0019, 000420-0025 and a portion of parcels 00420-0022 and 000420-0024 (approximately 5.3 acres) from "Multiple Family Residential" to "Moderate Density Residential" and the remainder of parcels 00420-0022, 000420-0024, and the entirety of parcel 000420-0003 (approximately 31.8 acres), from "Single Family Residential" to "Moderate Density Residential." Also, Planning Commission recommends approval of a corresponding zoning map change (REZ20-0002) for parcels 000420-0013, 00420-0019, 000420-0025 and a portion of parcels 00420-0022 and 000420-0024 (approximately 6.4 acres) from "R-20" to "R-16 with Staff Recommended Conditions" and the remainder of parcels 00420-0022, 000420-0024, and the entirety of parcel 000420-0003 (approximately 30.7 acres), from "R-7" to "R-16 with Staff Recommended Conditions." These five conditions, as discussed in this Staff Report, address a slightly reduced density Staff Member: Tate Date: November 15, 2020 Page 38 of 38 standard with variation, prescribed proportions and types of housing, a maximum number of apartment units, requirements for right-of-way dedication, and for addressing the need for potential upgrades to the existing sewer pump station: EXHIBIT LIST (As listed within original staff report to the Planning Commission hearing November 4, 2020) Exhibit 1 Agenda Bill (cover page) Exhibit 1a Staff Report Exhibit 2 Completed Master Land Use Application Form, Owner Auth. Form, Legal Description, and Maps & Exhibits, Received May 7, 2020 Exhibit 3 Applicant’s Request to Review Application, dated September 28, 2020 Exhibit 4 Revised Comprehensive Plan Statement, originally dated July 17, 2020, revised October 14, 2020 Exhibit 5 Revised Rezone Statement, originally dated July 17, 2020, revised October 14, 2020 Exhibit 5a Applicant’s response proposed Rezone Conditions, dated October 14, 2020 Exhibit 6 Traffic Impact Analysis, originally dated April 2020, revised August 2020, prepared by Gibson Traffic Consultants Exhibit 7 Completed SEPA Checklist, originally dated April 26, 2020, revised August 18, 2020 and October 14, 2020 Exhibit 8 Combined Notice of Application, Notice of Public Hearing, and Determination of Non-Significance, issued October 19, 2020 Exhibit 9 Dept. of Commerce Review Letter, dated October 22, 2020 Exhibit 10 Comprehensive Plan and Rezone Map – showing changes Exhibit 11 Sewer Pump Station Analysis, dated June 24, 2020, prepared by Pace Engineers Exhibit 12 Critical Areas Report, dated April 2018, prepared by Shockey Planning Group Exhibit 13 R-16 Residential zone Land Uses Table Exhibit 14 Sample House Plans Exhibit 15 Public Comments with City Responses -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 8 Exhibit B.1 Auburn Adventist Academy Plan Amendments 1 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 AUBURN ADVENTIST ACADEMY PLAN ADOPTED BY CITY OF AUBURN RESOLUTION NO 2254 NOVEMBER 18, 1991 Amended: November XX, 2020 2 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 AUBURN ACADEMY SPECIAL PLANNING AREA TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PLAN FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................. 1 A. Purpose of the Plan ....................................................................................... 1 B. Organization and Scope ............................................................................... 1 IL EXISTING CONDITIONS ………………………………………………………. 2 A. Land Use ......................................................................................................· 2 B. Infrastructure ................................................................................................ 2 C. Zoning .......................................................................................................... 2 III. PLAN POLICIES …………………………………………………………………. 3 A. Land Use Policies …………………………………………………………. 3 B. Natural Environment Policies ………………………………………………5 C. Facility Policies ……………………………………………………………. 5 IV. VICINITY MAP …………………………………………………………………... 6 3 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 I. PLAN FRAMEWORK A PURPOSE OF THE PLAN The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Auburn was adopted in August 1986 and provides the overall vision and policy framework for the City. The Comprehensive Plan provides a mechanism, called Special Planning Areas, for detailed planning of large areas under single or coordinated management within the Community Serving Area of the City. Each Special Planning Area is to have a specific plan developed for it based on the goals, objectives and policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan. The Auburn Adventist Academy was designated as a Special Planning Area in that a number of unique uses occur at the Academy other than the school. The Auburn Adventist Academy is a private secondary school multi-use campus owned and operated by the Western Washington Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists. The Campus plays a large role in the Western Washington Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists’ private elementary and secondary education system in Washington and hosts many community events as well as an annual regional camp meeting for Adventists from Washington and around the world. The Campus previously housed Harris Pine Mill, a furniture manufacturer, for many years. The Mill provided financial benefit to the Academy’s budget and provided employment opportunities, learning experiences, and vocational education for Academy students. While this has historically been the main cause of the property, the Church also desires to utilize its property to sever other needs of the Church membership in a manner compatible with the school. One need is the development of an “Industrial Park” to utilize the buildings which remained after the closure of Harris Pine Mills and to replace those buildings The Academy continues to include in its plan industrial uses that support the mission of the school financially. The reuse of existing mill buildings and redevelopment of buildings D destroyed by the fire in 1989 are the focal points of the current industrial development. The Academy will also be giving more focus to active agricultural uses of land with possibilities of growing Christmas trees, corn, hay and a variety of consumable products. These ancillary activities of the Academy provide employment opportunities for its students. Whenever possible these employment opportunities also provide real life learning experiences and vocational education. Since the school is a boarding school, opportunities for the students to earn their support is particularly important. The Academy is interested in increasing the range of employment opportunities it now provides in order to diversify the student’s educational opportunities and to provide more employment to more students. Thus, the versatility in the use of land for school/industry programs is vital to the Academy needs. The Academy also provides a unique educational experience in aviation training through its In addition to institutional and industrial uses, the Academy also operatesion of a private landing strip on their its property and associated aircraft hangers for student aviation and flight training. A single family subdivision is located to the south of the airstrip. In addition to these uses, the AUBURN ADVENTIST ACADEMY PLAN 4 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 Academy wishes to allow development of uses such a multi-family and senior housing, assisted living, and memory care which will generate a perpetual revenue that will directly aid its mission through a long-term land lease on a portion of the Campus. The financial benefit from these uses will allow funding an endowment, subsidize student tuition, provide financial aid for students needing tuition assistance, for new educational programs, for additional faculty, and facility maintenance and upgrades, and other needs not funded by student tuition. B. ORGANIZATION AND SCOPE The Academy Plan is designed to be incorporated Into the Comprehensive Plan as a Plan Element. The Academy Plan is Intended to provide long-term predictability to both the City and the Academy and will govern the future planning, zoning,· subdivision and development decisions. of the City as they apply to the subject area. This planning element is compatible with, and will comply with the City's existing comprehensive street, water, sewer and parks and recreation plans as they apply to this area. The Academy Plan applies the policy guidance contained in the Comprehensive Plan to the area known as the Academy. Plan policies are discussed as they relate to three main subject areas: land use; natural environment, and facilities. This Plan will only apply to the area within the property owned by the Auburn Adventist Academy. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. LAND USE Of the 255 acres that comprise the Academy, approximately 30% are developed. This development consists of academic and church use {12%), industrial, manufacturing and maintenance facilities (5%), single family residential (6%), and aircraft landing field (4%), with other miscellaneous and right-of-way uses. The remaining undeveloped land consists of steep slopes (25%), vacant (22%), agriculture (17%) with the rest being playground, camping or other open space uses. A significant amount of the vacant land that fronts on Auburn Way South and the vacant parcel that abuts the north boundary of Janssen's Addition have been identified by the City as containing wetlands. These wetlands were identified through th\3 City's wetland inventory that was completed in 1990 using the methodology contained within the Federal Manual for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands, 1989. The wetland inventory does however only show that wetlands are likely to be present on ttie site. The inventory does not determine the exact location, area or significance of the, wetlands. If and when the property is proposed to develop, then a specific wetland delineation study will need to be done. B. INFRASTRUCTURE: 5 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 The Academy is provided access by 32nd Street S.E. and Academy Drive. Both of these streets intersect with Auburn Way South. These streets have also been identified on the Comprehensive Plan as arterials, although neither street is developed to an arterial standard. Academy Drive traverses north, down a steep hill, and intersects with the Green Valley Road. This portion of Academy Drive is steep, winding, narrow as well as substandard and is often subject to landslides. The utilities, particularly water and storm drainage, marginally provide adequate service to the Academy. There is also a concern with the downstream ·capacity of the sanitary sewer. Any significant development of the Academy area will likely result in the Academy preparing comprehensive utility studies whi.ch may result in the need to improve the utility Infrastructure. C. ZONING The Academy Special Planning Area previously contained 3 separate zoning classifications: P-1, Public Use District; UNCL, Unclassified Use District; and I, Institutional Use District. The Academy Planning Area was zoned “I”, Institutional, as part of the adoption of the Academy Plan. The Institutional Use District was established in 1987. It was created primarily for the Academy. The Institutional zone may permit such uses as schools, daycare, churches, nursing homes, recreation and single family uses. Through a conditional use permit process, uses like colleges and universities, assembly and light manufacturing, manufactured home parks, multi-family dwellings, and retail sales may be allowed. III. PLAN POLICIES A. LAND USE POLICIES A.1.1. The Comprehensive Plan Map shall be amended to illustrate a Public and Quasi Public designation for the Academy. The principal use of the Academy shall be academic or church related. Any non-traditional academic or church use shall be considered secondary uses. Secondary uses must support the principal use of the property. A.1.2 Secondary uses shall be related to the Plan Purpose which is based on the Academy’s “Mission statement”. Excerpts of the Mission Statement, applicable to this Plan, are found within the “Auburn Academy Special Planning Area, Background Report,” prepared by the City of Auburn Planning Department in 1991. A.1.3 Secondary uses shall be limited in area and must be consistent with and compatible to adjoining uses. 6 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 A.1.4 Any future construction of industrial/manufacturing uses shall be located adjacent to those similar types of uses already existing. The industrial/manufacturing area should not expand much more than what now exists. The total area developed as industrial/manufacturing uses, which does not include the Academy maintenance facilities shall not exceed ten (10) acres. A.1.5 A single lot or parcel shall be established for the industrial/manufacturing users. The parcel shall be large enough to meet all the development standards required of the “I”, Institutional use zoning. This shall be established at the time of the first conditional use permit application for a manufacturing or industrial use. A.1.6 The existing amount of outdoor storage associated with the industrial/manufacturing users should not be expanded. The existing outdoor storage should be landscaped and screened to provide for more desirable views. A.1. 7 The area lying adjacent to and north of Janssen's Addition and south of the Academy's airstrip, when developed, shall be limited to single family homes on platted lots. The interim use of this parcel may be agricultural and associated uses, excluding livestock. A.1.8 The area lying generally north of Auburn Way South and south of 32nd Street S.E. shall either be used for academic, including administrative offices; church, multi- family and senior housing, assisted living and memory care which will generate a perpetual revenue that will directly aid the Academy’s mission;residential to include nursing and retirement homes, recreational campground or agricultural and associated uses, excluding livestock. Other uses may involve retail sales and service, but on a limited basis. A.1.9 The airstrip shall be used only for training, recreation or transportation for the schools' uses, students and residents of the Academy. No other use of the airstrip shall be allowed. The type of aircraft to use the airstrip shall be limited to conventional, fixed wing, as approved by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for this type of airfield. A.1.10 The uses generally abutting the airstrip should be limited to agricultural and associated uses, excluding livestock. If the airstrip were to be abandoned, then single family residential would be appropriate. 7 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 A.1.11 The steep slopes on the northern boundary of the Academy shall be retained as a natural environment, except to allow for passive recreational uses that are compatible with the sensitivity of the slopes. The slopes shall not be used to meet any development standard for related projects of the Academy. A.1.12 The Academy shall be developed such that its appearance is an open, campus- like environment. A.1.13 All the property owned by the Academy shall be zoned “I”, Institutional use. This shall be implemented by an •area wide" zoning initiated by the City. The ordinance adopting the “I” zone shall contain conditions limiting the location of uses as the policies of this plan direct. A.1.14 Only the Academy shall be allowed to develop secondary uses within the Special Planning Area. If the Academy were to sell property, that is currently developed or is proposed to be developed as a secondary use, to a private party then the fallowing shall apply: a. If the parcel(s) is vacant or underdeveloped the parcel shall be zoned to the appropriate City zone, other than “I”, and the Comprehensive Plan Map amended accordingly. Any new Comprehensive Plan Map designation and zoning district must be consistent with and compatible to the existing, adjoining Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designations; or, the proposal shall be denied. b. If the parcel is developed and cannot be zoned with a zone that is compatible and consistent with the existing, adjoining Comprehensive Plan Map and zoning designation, then the use shall be considered non- conforming and be governed pursuant to the non-conforming regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. B. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT POLICIES A.2.1 The steep slopes on the northern boundary of the Special Planning Area shall be retained as a natural environment, except to allow tor passive recreational uses that are compatible with the sensitivity of the slopes. A.2.2 Future development, or any change of use, that may impact the existing wetlands shall be consistent with the City's existing wetland policies and any subsequent amendments to those policies or adoption of any City legislation affecting wetlands. 8 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 C. FACILITY POLICIES A.3.1 Any proposed development, that is not exempt from the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), shall be required to provide a study on each utility that the development requires as well as a traffic study. The study(ies) shall become part of the required environmental review. a. The scope and content of the study(ies) shall be determined by the Public Works Director. The studies shall be consistent with· and implement the City's existing · Utility and Street Comprehensive Plans, including any subsequent amendments. b. The study(ies) shall determine the impacts and what mitigating measures will be required to alleviate the impacts. Mitigating measures may include construction of off-site Improvements and/or financial participation in the construction of those off-site improvements. A.3.2 The number of accesses to Auburn Way South shall be limited. This may the require construction of an additional public street to connect Auburn Way South to 32nd Street S.E. 9 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28104748.1 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 9 Exhibit B.2 Auburn Adventist Academy Comprehensive Plan Policy Amendments 1 - PDX\133979\254493\ALM\28624350.1 LU-135 Adventist Academy - Adopted under Resolution No. 2254 on November 14, 1991. The Auburn Adventist Academy is primarily a secondary school Special Planning Area (Adopted Area) is a multi-use campus operated by the Western Washington Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists. The Campus plays a large role in the Western Washington Conference of Seventh-Day Adventists’ private elementary and secondary education system in Washington and hosts many community events as well as an annual regional camp meeting for Adventists from Washington and around the world. The Campus previously housed Harris Pine Mill, a furniture manufacturer, for many years. The Mill provided financial benefit to the Academy’s budget and provided employment opportunities, learning experiences, and vocational education for Academy students. Since the school is sited on a larger complex that formerly housed a mill, tThe Academy continues has also sought to include in its plan industrial uses that support the mission of the school financially. The industrial uses provide employment opportunities, learning experiences, and vocational education for students of the Academy. The reuse of existing mill buildings and redevelopment of buildings lost to a fire in 1989 are the focal points of the current industrial development. In addition to institutional and industrial uses, the Academy is also interested in agricultural uses for commercial and vocational purposes and currently operates a landing strip and associated aircraft hangars for student aviation and flight training. A single family subdivision is located to the south of the airstrip. In addition to these uses, the Academy wishes to allow development of uses such a multi- family and senior housing and assisted living and memory care which will generate perpetual revenue through a long-term land lease on a portion of the Campus lying generally north of Auburn Way South and south of 32nd Street S.E. that will directly aid its mission. The financial benefit from these uses will allow funding an endowment, subsidize student tuition, provide financial aid for students needing tuition assistance, for new educational programs, for additional faculty, facility maintenance and upgrades, and other needs. The plan focuses on providesing predictability to planning, zoning, subdivision, and development decisions within the Special Planning Area (Adopted Area) made by the City. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 10 Exhibit C.1 Westport Capital LLC Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments 666.7 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet666.7333.30 1:4,000 Ordinance 6803 Exhibit C.1 1in =333 ft 11/25/2020Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 11 Exhibit C.2 Westport Capital LLC Zoning Map Amendments 666.7 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet666.7333.30 1:4,000 Ordinance 6803 Exhibit C.2 1in =333 ft 11/25/2020Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 12 Exhibit D.1 Auburn School District Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map Amendment 333.3 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet333.3166.70 1:2,000 Ordinance 6803 Exhibit D.1 1in =167 ft 11/25/2020Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 13 Exhibit D.2 Auburn School District Zoning Map Amendment -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 14 Exhibit E.1 Auburn School District Capital Facility Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 Adopted by the Auburn School District Board of Directors June 22, 2020 Auburn School District No. 408 Ryan Van Quill Sheilia McLaughlin Laurie Bishop (253) 931-4900 City of Pacific City of Algona City of Kent City of Black Diamond Dr. Alan Spicciati, Superintendent BOARD of DIRECTORS Laura Theimer Arlista Holman 915 Fourth Street NE Auburn, Washington 98002 Unincorporated King County City of Auburn Serving Students in: Section I Executive Summary ……………………Page 1 Section II Enrollment Projections…………………Page 6 Section III Standard of Service……………………Page 12 Section IV Inventory of Facilities……………………Page 20 Section V Pupil Capacity……………………………Page 24 Section VI Capital Construction Plan………………Page 27 Section VII Impact Fees………………………………Page 31 Section VIII Appendices…………………………..…Page 36 Appendix A.1 - Capital Facilities Plan Projections Page 38 Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey Page 40 Table of Contents Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section I Executive Summary 2 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 I. Executive Summary This six-year Capital Facilities Plan (the “Plan”) has been prepared by the Auburn School District (the “District”) as the District’s principal planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington’s Growth Management Act and the adopted ordinances of the counties and cities served by the District. This Plan was prepared using data available in the spring of 2020. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the District. However, this Plan is not intended to be the sole plan for all of the District’s needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic long-range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies and actions, taking into account a longer or a shorter time period; other factors and trends in the use of facilities; and other needs of the District as may be required. However, any such plan or plans will be consistent with this six-year Capital Facilities Plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the unincorporated areas of King County and within the City of Auburn and City of Kent; the King County Council, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent will adopt this Plan by reference as part of each jurisdiction’s respective comprehensive plan. To enable the collection of impact fees in the Cities of Algona, Pacific, and Black Diamond, these municipalities must also adopt this Plan and adopt school impact fee ordinances. Pursuant to the requirements of the Growth Management Act and the local ordinances, this Plan will be updated on an annual basis, and any changes in the fee schedule(s) adjusted accordingly. The Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for the local program needs of the District. The Growth Management Act and the school impact fee ordinance authorize the District to define its standard of service based on the District’s specific needs. In general, the District’s current standard provides that class size for grades K-3 should not exceed 17 students and class size for grades 4-5 should not exceed 27 students. When averaged over the six elementary school grades, this computes to 20.33 students per classroom. Class size for grade 6 should not exceed 27 students and class size for grades 7 and 8 should not exceed 28.53 students. When averaged over the three middle school grades, this computes to 28.02 students per classroom. Class size for 9-12 should not exceed 28.74 students, with some subject areas restricted to lesser numbers. Decisions by current legislative actions may create the need for additional classrooms. (See Section III for more specific information.) The capacity of the schools in the District is calculated based on this standard of service and the existing inventory of facilities including transitional classrooms. The District’s 3 2019-20 capacity was 13,997. The actual number of individual students was 17,300 as of October 1, 2019. (See Section V for more specific information.) The Capital Construction Plan shown in Section VI addresses the additions and proposed modernization to the District’s existing facilities. The plan includes the replacement of five elementary schools and one middle school, construction of two new elementary schools, and acquisition of future school sites to accommodate growth. The new facilities are required to meet the projected elementary school class size reductions mandated by the State of Washington and student population increases generated by the large development areas within the Auburn School District. Three areas that have significant impact on the school district are the Lakeland South, Lea Hill, and the valley areas of the district. There are also other development pockets that impact the District. The District completed a comprehensive review of all district facilities in October 2008. A Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board for capital improvements to existing facilities and replacement of seven schools over the next ten years. These recommendations led to a capital improvements levy and a bond issue that was placed on the ballot in March 2009. Both ballot measures were unsuccessful in March. The Board determined to rerun only the capital improvements levy in November 2009, which the voters approved. In the fall of 2011, the Board determined to move forward with the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project and placed the project before the voters in February of 2012. The bond issue was supported by the community at nearly 57% approval rate, but was short of the super majority requirement of 60%. In March of 2012, the Board determined to rerun the bond in November of 2012. In November 2012, the bond passed at 62%. The project was completed during the summer of 2016. In the spring of 2016, the Board determined to move forward with the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools. The project was placed before the voters in November 2016 and the bond passed at 62.83%. The first of the projects, the replacement of Olympic Middle School, started construction in May 2018 and opened in Fall 2019. Construction of new Elementary School #15 started in May 2019 and construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School started in June 2019. Both schools will open in Fall 2020. Construction of new Elementary School #16 and construction of the replacement Pioneer Elementary School started May 2020. The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent provide for the assessment of impact fees to assist in meeting some of the fiscal impacts incurred by a district experiencing growth and development. Section VII sets forth the proposed school impact fees for single family and multi-family dwelling units. The student generation factors have been developed using the students who actually attend school in the Auburn School District from single family and multi-family developments constructed in the last five years. There have been dramatic changes in the student generation factors for single and multi-family in the past five years. The District plans to carefully monitor the numbers over the next several years to determine if this is a trend or an anomaly. The method of collecting the data is with the use of GIS mapping software, data from King County and Pierce County GIS, data from Davis Demographics and integration of the mapping with student data from the District’s student data system. This method gives the District actual student generation numbers for each grade span for identified developments. This data is contained in Appendix A.3. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Listed below is a summary level outline of the changes from the 2019 Capital Facilities Plan that are a part of the 2020 Plan. The changes are noted by Section for ease of reference. Section I Executive Summary A. Updated to reflect new information within the Plan. B. Summary level list of changes from previous year. Section II Enrollment Projections A. Updated projections. See Section II & Appendices A.1. Section III Standard of Service A. Updated to reflect current number of classrooms allocated to non-standard classroom uses. Section IV Inventory of Facilities A. Add 1 portable at Washington Elementary School. B. Add 1 portable at Cascade Middle School. C. Add 4 portables at Olympic Middle School. D. Add 2 portables at Rainier Middle School. E. Remove 3 portables from Gildo Rey Elementary School. F. Remove 5 portables from Pioneer Elementary School. Section V Pupil Capacity The eight portables to be relocated in June 2020 are needed to accommodate enrollment increases. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Impact Fees CHANGES TO IMPACT FEE DATA ELEMENTS 2019 to 2020 CPF CPF 2019 2020 EXPLANATION Student Generation Factors Single Family Consistent with King County Ordinance 11621, Elementary 0.2370 0.2500 Student Generation Factors are calculated Middle School 0.0960 0.1310 by the school district based on district Sr. High 0.1280 0.1520 records of average actual student generation Multi-Family rates for new developments constructed Elementary 0.3820 0.4330 over the last five years. Middle School 0.1530 0.1850 Sr. High 0.1510 0.1750 School Construction Costs Elementary $60,200,000 $60,200,000 Site Acquisition Costs Cost per acre $385,083 $404,377 Updated estimate based on 5% annual inflation. Area Cost Allowance Boeckh Index $225.97 $225.97 Updated to current OSPI schedule. (July 2019) Match % - State 64.99%66.32%Updated to current OSPI schedule (May 2019) Match % - District 35.01%33.68%Computed District Average AV Single Family $366,092 $374,661 Updated from March 2020 King County Dept of Assessments data. Multi-Family $161,495 $160,501 Updated from March 2020 King County Dept of Assessments data using average AV for apartments and condominiums. Debt Serv Tax Rate $2.05 $2.41 Current Fiscal Year GO Bond Int Rate 4.09%2.44%Current Rate (Bond Buyers 20 Index 3-14) Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - Updated enrollment projections with anticipated buildout schedule from April 2020 Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey April 2020 DATA ELEMENTS From new school construction cost estimate in April 2019 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section II Enrollment Projections Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 7 II. Student Enrollment Projections Introduction Projection techniques give some consideration to historical and current data as a basis for forecasting the future. In addition, certain assumptions must be made about the variables in the data being used. Forecasting can be defined as the extrapolation or logical extension from history to the future or from the known to the unknown. The projection logic does not attempt to weigh the individual sociological, psychological, economic, and political factors that are present in any demographic analysis and projection. The logic embraces the assumptions that whatever these individual factors have been in the past are present today and will be in the future. It further moderates the impact of singular factors by averaging data over time. The results provide a trend which reflects a long (13 year) and short (6 year) base from which to extrapolate. The degree to which the actuals deviate from the projections can only be measured after the fact. This deviation provides a point of departure to evaluate the effectiveness of the assumptions and logic being used to calculate future projections. Monitoring deviation is critical to the viability and creditably of the projections derived by these techniques. Summary of 2020-21 Enrollment Projections Table II.1 shows historical enrollment for the October 1 count in the Auburn School District over the past 13 years. The data shows overall average growth over these thirteen years of 1.46%. In the recent six years, growth has been an overwhelming 2.44% average increase. Table II.2 groups the historical enrollment by grade bands. This data is the baseline information used to project future enrollment. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 8 Table II.3 shows the three basic factors derived from the data in Table II.1. These factors are: ● Factor 1--Average Student Change Between Grade Levels: This factor is sometimes referred to as the “holding power” or “cohort survival.” It is a measure of the number of students gained or lost as they move from one grade level to the next. ● Factor 2--Average Student Change by Grade Level: This factor is the average change at each grade level over the 13- or 6-year period. ● Factor 3--Auburn School District Kindergarten Enrollments as a Function of King County Live Births: This factor calculates what percent each kindergarten class was of the King County live births in the five previous years. Kindergarten students expected for the next four years have been extrapolated from this information. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 9 Table II.4 shows the current year actual enrollment as of October 1, 2019 and projected enrollment for 2020-21 and five years after. Prior to the COVID health crisis, all projection models showed enrollment growth of 1.0% to 2%. This year is the eighth consecutive year of an increase in enrollment. The 2019-20 increase of 351 students puts the average gain for the last 6 years at 2.44% which equates to an average student gain of 388 students. Given the uncertainty we are facing, the decision was made to use the lowest growth model to estimate projections for the 2020-21 school year. In addition, enrollment projections are transitioning to call out special programs that have impacts on enrollment such as Running Start and Open Doors program. In the past, enrollment projections have included Running Start and Open Doors programs even though those students did not attend school full time. For this reason, note the 2020-21 projections compared to 2019-20 actual shows a slight decrease. However, when you base growth on the full-time students attending Auburn schools, that percent reflects a 1% increase overall. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 10 Tables II.4a-d show projections based upon the 13- and 6-year models using cohort factors and two methods of estimating kindergarten students. The first uses the average increase or decrease over the past 13- and 6-year timeframe and adds it to each succeeding year. The second derives what the average percentage Auburn Kindergarteners have been from live births in King County for the past 5 years and uses this to project the subsequent four years. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 11 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section III Standard of Service Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 13 The School Impact Fee Ordinances adopted by King County, the City of Auburn and the City of Kent indicate that each school district must establish a "Standard of Service" in order to ascertain the overall capacity to house its projected student population. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage "capacity" guidelines for computing state funding support. The fundamental purpose of the OSPI guidelines is to provide a vehicle to equitably distribute state matching funds for school construction projects. By default these guidelines have been used to benchmark the district's capacity to house its student population. The OSPI guidelines do not make adequate provision for local district program needs, facility configurations, emerging educational reform, or the dynamics of each student's educational program. The Auburn School District Standard of Service addresses those local considerations that require space in excess of the OSPI guidelines. The effect on the space requirements for both permanent and relocatable facilities is shown below for each grade articulation pattern. Conditions that may result in potential space needs are provided for information purposes without accompanying computations. OVERVIEW The Auburn School District operates fourteen elementary schools housing 7,899 students in grades K through 5. The four middle schools house 3,869 students in grades 6 through 8. The District operates three comprehensive senior high schools and one alternative high school, housing 5,532 students in grades 9 through 12. CLASS SIZE The number of pupils per classroom determines the number of classrooms required to house the student population. Specialists create additional space needs. Class sizes are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Changes to class size agreements can have significant impact on available space. The current pupil/teacher limit across all elementary programs is an average of 20.33 students per teacher. Consistent with this staffing limit, room capacities are set at 20.33 students per room at grades K - 5. At grades 6 - 8 the limit is set at 28.02 students per room. At grades 9 - 12 the limit is set at 28.74 students per room. The OSPI space allocation for each grade articulation level, less the computed reduction for the Auburn School District Standard of Service, determines the District's capacity to house projected pupil populations. These reductions are shown below by grade articulation level. STRUCTURED LEARNING FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a structured learning program for students with moderate to severe disabilities at the elementary school level which currently uses 15 classrooms to provide for 126 students. The housing requirements for this program are provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. No loss of capacity is expected unless population with disabilities grows at a disproportionate rate compared to total elementary population. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates an adaptive behavior program for students with behavior disabilities at the elementary school level. The program uses three classrooms to provide for 28 students. The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space allocations. (Three classrooms @ 20.33 - 11 = 9.33) Loss of Permanent Capacity 3 rooms @ 9.33 each =(28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 9.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(28) ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 14 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the elementary level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific disabilities. Nineteen standard classrooms are required to house this program. The housing requirements for this program exceed the OSPI space guidelines. Continued loss of capacity is expected as growth in program is larger than the total elementary population. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 (17-8) rooms @ 20.33 each =(183) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(183) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the elementary level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 20.33 each =(20) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(20) EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates a pre-school program for young children below age five with disabilities. This program is housed at seven different elementary schools and currently uses 12 standard classrooms. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 20.33 each =(244) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(244) READING LABS The Auburn School District operates a program for students needing remediation and additional language arts instruction. These programs utilize non-standard classroom spaces if available in each elementary school. Four elementary schools do not have non-standard rooms available, thus they are housed in a standard classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 5 rooms @ 20.33 each =(102) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(102) MUSIC ROOMS The Auburn School District elementary music programs require one acoustically-modified classroom at each school for music instruction. The housing requirements are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each =(305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(305) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 15 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates pullout programs at the elementary school level for students learning English as a second language. This program requires 30 standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 30 rooms @ 20.33 each =(610) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(610) SECOND GRADE TOSA PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a TOSA reading specialist program for eight highly-impacted elementary schools. This pullout model provides direct instruction to students who are not at grade level and do not receive other services. This program requires eight standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 20.33 each =(163) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(163) ELEMENTARY LEARNING SPECIALIST PROGRAM The Auburn School District provides a learning specialist program to increase literacy skills for first and second graders. This program model was originally created from the I-728 funds and currently has the specialist going into existing teacher classrooms, as well as pulling out students into designated classrooms. The district is utilizing classrooms at all fourteen elementary schools. Loss of Permanent Capacity 15 rooms @ 20.33 each =(305) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(305) EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates an ECEAP program for 246 pre-school aged children in twelve sections of half-day length and one full-day program. The program is housed at three elementary schools and three off-site locations and utilizes three standard elementary classrooms and four additional classroom spaces and four auxiliary office spaces. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7 rooms @ 20.33 each =(142) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 20.33 each =0 Total Capacity Loss =(142) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 16 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program for each grade at the middle school level. This is to accommodate special education students needing remedial instruction to address their specific disabilities. Eleven classrooms are required at the middle school level to provide for approximately 292 students. The housing requirements for this program are not entirely provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior disabilities. The program is housed at one of the middle schools and uses two classrooms. One of the two classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 rooms @ 28.02 each =(28) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (28) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER AND DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District operates six structured learning classrooms at the middle school level for students with moderate to severe disabilities. Two of the six classrooms for this program are provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 28.02 each =(112) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (112) NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the middle school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.02 each =28 Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss 28 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at the middle school level for English Language Learner students. This program requires nine standard classrooms that are not provide for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 9 rooms @ 28.02 each =(252) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (252) MIDDLE SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 17 ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive middle school program that includes elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. OSPI Report #3 dated 12/14/11 identifies 148 teaching stations available in the mid-level facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 8 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 8 rooms @ 28.02 each =(224) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.02 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (224) Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 18 NATIVE AMERICAN RESOURCE ROOM The Auburn School District operates one resource room to support the education of Native American students at the high school level. One standard classroom is fully dedicated to serve these students. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each =29 Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss 29 SENIOR HIGH COMPUTER LABS The Auburn School District support standard allows for one open computer lab at each of the senior high schools. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 4 rooms @ 28.74 each =(115) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (115) ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates a pullout program at three comprehensive high schools for English Language Learner students. This program requires eleven standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 11 rooms @ 28.74 each =(316) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (316) PATHWAYS SPECIAL EDUCATION The Auburn School District offers a self-contained program for students with moderate to severe behavior diabilities. The program is housed at one of the high schools and uses one classroom. The housing requirements for this program are not provided for in the OSPI space allocations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 1 room @ 28.74 each =(29) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (29) STRUCTURED LEARNING CENTER PROGRAM The Auburn School District operates twelve structured learning center classrooms for students with moderate to severe disabilities. This program is housed at three high schools requiring standard classrooms that are not provided for in the OSPI space guidelines. Loss of Permanent Capacity 12 rooms @ 28.74 each =(345) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (345) SENIOR HIGH SCHOOLS Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 STANDARD OF SERVICE 19 SPECIAL EDUCATION RESOURCE ROOMS The Auburn School District operates a resource room program at the senior high level for special education students requiring instruction to address their specific learning disabilities. The current high school program requires 15 classrooms to provide program to meet educational needs of the students. The OSPI space guidelines provide for one of the 15 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 14 rooms @ 28.74 each =(402) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (402) PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS Auburn High School includes 25,000 square feet used exclusively for a Performing Arts Center. The OSPI Inventory includes this space when computing unhoused student capacity. This space was not intended for, nor is it usable for, classroom instruction. It was constructed to provide a community center for the performing arts. Using OSPI capacity guidelines, 25,000 square feet computes to 208 unhoused students or 7.25 classrooms. Loss of Permanent Capacity 7.25 rooms @ 28.74 each =(208) ROOM UTILIZATION The Auburn School District provides a comprehensive high school program that includes numerous elective options in special interest areas. Facilities to accommodate special interest activities are not amenable to standard classroom usage. The district averages 95% utilization of all available teaching stations. There are 185 teaching stations available in the senior high facilities. The utilization pattern results in a loss of approximately 10 teaching stations. Loss of Permanent Capacity 10 rooms @ 28.74 each =(287) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 rooms @ 28.74 each =0 Total Capacity Loss (287) STANDARD OF SERVICE COMPUTED TOTALS ELEMENTARY Loss of Permanent Capacity (2,102) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (2,102) MIDDLE SCHOOL Loss of Permanent Capacity (588) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (588) SENIOR HIGH Loss of Permanent Capacity (1,674) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (1,674) TOTAL Loss of Permanent Capacity (4,364) Loss of Temporary Capacity 0 Total Capacity Loss (4,364) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section IV Inventory of Facilities Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 21 Table IV.1 shows the current inventory of permanent district facilities and their OSPI rated capacities. Table IV.2 shows the number and location of each portable unit by school. The district uses relocatable facilities to: 1. provide interim housing in school attendance areas uniquely impacted by increasing school populations that would otherwise require continual redistricting, 2. make space available for changing program requirements and offerings determined by unique student needs, and 3. provide housing to cover district needs until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. Relocatable facilities are deemed to be interim, stop gap measures that often place undesirable stress on existing physical plants. Core facilities (i.e. gymnasiums, restrooms, kitchens, labs, lockers, libraries, etc.) are not of sufficient size or quantity to handle the increased school population served by adding relocatable classrooms. District School Facilities Building Capacity Acres Address Elementary Schools Washington Elementary 494 5.33 20 E Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Terminal Park Elementary 415 6.09 1101 D Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Dick Scobee Elementary 484 8.90 1031 14th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Pioneer Elementary 441 8.40 2301 M Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Chinook Elementary 461 10.99 3502 Auburn Way South, Auburn WA, 98092 Lea Hill Elementary 450 20.24 30908 124th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Gildo Rey Elementary 566 10.05 1005 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Evergreen Heights Elem. 463 10.10 5602 South 316th, Auburn WA, 98001 Alpac Elementary 505 10.68 310 Milwaukee Boulevard North, Pacific WA, 98047 Lake View Elementary 581 16.44 16401 Southeast 318th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Hazelwood Elementary 594 13.08 11815 Southeast 304th Street, Auburn WA, 98092 Ilalko Elementary 592 14.23 301 Oravetz Place Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Lakeland Hills Elementary 594 12.00 1020 Evergreen Way SE, Auburn WA, 98092 Arthur Jacobsen Elementary 614 10.02 29205 132nd Street SE, Auburn WA, 98092 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254 Middle Schools Cascade Middle School 837 16.94 1015 24th Street Northeast, Auburn WA, 98002 Olympic Middle School 974 17.45 839 21st Street SE, Auburn WA, 98002 Rainier Middle School 843 25.54 30620 116th Avenue Southeast, Auburn WA, 98092 Mt. Baker Middle School 837 30.00 620 37th Street Southeast, Auburn WA, 98002 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,317 Senior High Schools West Auburn HS 233 5.26 401 West Main Street, Auburn WA, 98001 Auburn HS 2,127 23.74 711 East Main Street, Auburn WA, 98002 Auburn Riverside HS 1,387 35.32 501 Oravetz Road, Auburn WA, 98092 Auburn Mountainview HS 1,443 39.42 28900 124th Ave SE, Auburn WA, 98092 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 TOTAL CAPACITY 15,761 Table Permanent Facilities IV.1 @ OSPI Rated Capacity (March 2020) nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nmnm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm nm k nm STATE ROUTE 167AUBURN WAY NAUBURN W AY S A U B U R N - E N U M C L A W R D S ESR 167SR 167SR 18SR 18Administration Building Alpac ES Arthur Jacobsen ES Auburn HS Auburn Mountainview HS Auburn Riverside HS Bowman Creek ES Cascade MS Chinook ES Dick Scobee ESEvergreen Height s ES Gildo Rey ES Hazelwood ES Ilalko ES Lake View ES Lakeland Hills ES Lea Hill ES Mt Baker MS Olympic MS Pioneer ES Rainier MS Terminal Park ES Washington ESWest Auburn HS Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID,IGN, and the GIS U ser Community Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 INVENTORY OF FACILITIES 23 TABLE TEMPORARY/RELOCATABLE IV.2 FACILITIES INVENTORY (June 2020) Elementary Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 Washington 6 7 8 9 9 9 9 Terminal Park 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 Dick Scobee 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pioneer 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Chinook 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 Lea Hill 13 13 0 0 0 0 0 Gildo Rey 7 4 4 5 5 5 5 Evergreen Heights 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Alpac 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Lake View 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Hazelwood 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Ilalko 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 Lakeland Hills 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Arthur Jacobsen 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Bowman Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Elementary #16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL UNITS 79 72 55 49 49 49 49 TOTAL CAPACITY 1,606 1,464 1,118 996 996 996 996 Middle School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 Cascade 0 1 4 4 4 4 4 Olympic 0 4 6 6 6 6 6 Rainier 7 9 10 10 10 10 10 Mt. Baker 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 TOTAL UNITS 17 24 31 31 31 31 31 TOTAL CAPACITY 476 672 869 869 869 869 869 Sr. High School Location 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 West Auburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Auburn High School 0 0 2 3 3 3 3 Auburn High School - *TAP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Auburn Riverside 13 13 13 14 14 14 14 Auburn Mountainview 4 4 6 8 8 8 8 TOTAL UNITS 18 18 22 26 26 26 26 TOTAL CAPACITY 517 517 632 747 747 747 747 *TAP - Transition Assistance Program for 18-21 year old students with special needs. COMBINED TOTAL UNITS 114 114 108 106 106 106 106 COMBINED TOTAL CAPACITY 2,600 2,654 2,619 2,612 2,612 2,612 2,612 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section V Pupil Capacity Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 PUPIL CAPACITY 25 While the Auburn School District uses the OSPI inventory of permanent facilities as the data from which to determine space needs, the District's educational program requires more space than that provided for under the formula. This additional square footage is converted to numbers of pupils in Section III, Standard of Service. The District's capacity is adjusted to reflect the need for additional space to house its programs. Changes in the capacity of the district recognize new funded facilities. The combined effect of these adjustments is shown on Line B in Tables V.1 and V.2 below. Table V.1 shows the Distict's capacity with relocatable units included and Table V.2 without these units. Table V.1 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 A.SPI Capacity 15,761 15,761 16,577 17,436 17,825 18,060 18,060 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 166 209 389 235 B.Capacity Adjustments (1,764)(1,710)(1,745)(1,752)(1,696)(1,696)(1,696) C.Net Capacity 13,997 14,867 15,691 16,073 16,364 16,364 16,364 D.ASD Enrollment 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 19,365 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (3,264)(2,751)(2,314)(2,274)(2,336)(2,689)(3,001) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS Include Relocatable 2,600 2,654 2,619 2,612 2,668 2,668 2,668 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364) Total Adjustments (1,764)(1,710)(1,745)(1,752)(1,696)(1,696)(1,696) Table V.2 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 A.SPI Capacity 15,761 15,761 16,577 17,436 17,825 18,060 18,060 A.1 SPI Capacity-New Elem 650 650 A.2 SPI Capacity-Replacements 166 209 389 235 B.Capacity Adjustments (4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364) C.Net Capacity 11,397 12,213 13,072 13,461 13,696 13,696 13,696 D.ASD Enrollment 17,261 17,618 18,005 18,347 18,700 19,053 19,365 3/E.ASD Surplus/Deficit (5,864)(5,405)(4,933)(4,886)(5,004)(5,357)(5,669) CAPACITY ADJUSTMENTS 2/Exclude SOS (pg 14)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364) Total Adjustments (4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364)(4,364) 1/New facilities shown in 2019-20 through 2023-24 are funded by the 2016 School Bond Issue. 2/The Standard of Service represents 27.69% of OSPI capacity. When new facilities are added the Standard of Service computations are decreased to 24.16% of SPI capacity. 3/Students beyond the capacity are accommodated in other spaces (commons, library, theater, shared teaching space). Capacity WITH relocatables Capacity WITHOUT relocatables Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 PUPIL CAPACITY 26 A.Elementary Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Washington 494 494 494 494 494 494 494 Terminal Park 415 415 415 415 650 650 650 Dick Scobee 484 650 650 650 650 650 650 Pioneer 441 441 650 650 650 650 650 Chinook 461 461 461 650 650 650 650 Lea Hill 450 450 450 650 650 650 650 Gildo Rey 566 566 566 566 566 566 566 Evergreen Heights 463 463 463 463 463 463 463 Alpac 505 505 505 505 505 505 505 Lake View 581 581 581 581 581 581 581 Hazelwood 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Ilalko 592 592 592 592 592 592 592 Lakeland Hills 594 594 594 594 594 594 594 Arthur Jacobsen 614 614 614 614 614 614 614 Elementary #15 650 650 650 650 650 650 Elementary #16 650 650 650 650 650 ELEMENTARY CAPACITY 7,254 8,070 8,929 9,318 9,553 9,553 9,553 B.Middle Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 Cascade 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 Olympic 800 800 800 800 800 800 800 Rainier 843 843 843 843 843 843 843 Mt. Baker 837 837 837 837 837 837 837 MIDDLE SCHOOL CAPACITY 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 3,317 C.Senior High Schools Building 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 West Auburn 233 233 233 233 233 233 233 Auburn 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 2,127 Auburn Riverside 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 1,387 Auburn Mountainview 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 1,443 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITY 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 5,190 COMBINED CAPACITY 15,761 16,577 17,436 17,825 18,060 18,060 18,060 PERMANENT FACILITIES @ SPI Rated Capacity (March 2020) Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section VI Capital Construction Plan Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 28 The formal process used by the Board to address current and future facility needs began in 1974 with the formation of a community wide citizens committee. The result of this committee's work was published in the document titled 'Guidelines for Development.' In 1985 the Board formed a second Ad Hoc citizens committee to further the work of the first and address the needs of the District for subsequent years. The work of this committee was published in the document titled 'Directions for the Nineties.' In 1995 the Board commissioned a third Ad Hoc citizens committee to make recommendations for improvements to the District's programs and physical facilities. The committee recommendations are published in the document titled 'Education Into The Twenty-First Century - - A Community Involved.' The 1995 Ad Hoc committee recommended the District develop plans for the implementation, funding, and deployment of technology throughout the District's programs. The 1996 Bond proposition provided funding to enhance the capacity of each facility to accommodate technological applications. The 1998 Capital Levy provided funding to further deploy technology at a level sufficient to support program requirements in every classroom and department. In 2005 and 2014, replacement technology levies were approved to continue to support technology across all facets of the District’s teaching, learning and operations. In addition to the technology needs of the District, the Ad Hoc committee recognized the District must prepare for continued student enrollment growth. As stated in their report, "the District must pursue an appropriate high school site as soon as possible." The Ad Hoc recommendation included commentary that the financing should be timed to maintain consistent rates of tax assessments. A proposition was approved by the voters on April 28, 1998 that provided $8,000,000 over six years to address some of the technology needs of the District; and $5,000,000 to provide funds to acquire school sites. During the 1997-98 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Dieringer School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population from an area that includes a large development known as Lakeland South. Lakeland South at that time was immediately adjacent to the southern boundary of the Auburn School District. On June 16, 1998, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Dieringer Boards of Directors. On June 22, 1998, the Auburn School Board adopted Resolution No. 933 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 23, 1998, the Dieringer School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 24-97-98 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from Dieringer to Auburn containing most of the Lakeland South development and certain other undeveloped properties. Property for the third comprehensive high school was acquired in 1999. The Board placed the proposition to construct a new high school on the ballot four times. Each election was extremely close to passing. After the fourth failure a community meeting was held and from that meeting the Board determined need for further community study. In April of 2002, the Board formed a fifth citizen's Ad Hoc committee to address the following two items and make recommendations to the Board in the Fall of 2002: a. A review of the conclusion and recommendations of 1985 and 1995 Ad Hoc Committees related to accommodating high school enrollment growth. This included the review of possible financing plans for new facilities. b. Develop recommendations for accommodating high school enrollment growth for the next 10 years if a new senior high school is not built. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 29 This committee recommended the Board place the high school on the ballot for the fifth time in February 2003. The February election approved the new high school at 68.71% yes votes. The school opened in the fall of 2005. In the fall of 2003, the Board directed the administration to begin the planning and design for Elementary #13 and Elementary #14. In the fall of 2004, the Board passed Resolution No. 1054 to place two elementary schools on the ballot in February 2005. The voters approved the ballot measure in February of 2005 at 64.72%. Lakeland Hills Elementary (Elementary #13) opened in the fall of 2006. Arthur Jacobsen Elementary (Elementary #14) is located in the Lea Hill area and opened in the fall of 2007. These two elementary schools were built to accommodate the housing growth in Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas of the school district. In the 2004-05 school year, the Board convened a sixth Citizen’s Ad Hoc committee to again study and make recommendations about the future impacts in the District. One of the areas of study was the need for New Facilities and Modernization. The committee made a number of recommendations including school size, the need for a new middle school, and to begin a capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities based upon criterion. During the 2005-06 school year, a Joint District Citizen's Ad Hoc Committee was appointed by the Auburn and Kent School Boards to make recommendations on how best to serve the school population that will come from an area that includes a number of projected developments in the north Auburn valley. On May 17, 2006, the Ad Hoc Committee presented its recommendation at a joint meeting of the Auburn and Kent Boards of Directors. On June 14, 2006, the Kent School Board adopted Resolution No. 1225 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries of the District in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. On June 26, 2006, the Auburn School Board adopted a companion Resolution No. 1073 authorizing the process to initiate the adjustment of the boundaries in accordance with the Ad Hoc Committee's recommendation. These actions resulted in the transfer of an area from the Kent School District to the Auburn School District effective September 29, 2006. In October of 2008, after two years of review and study, a Steering Committee made recommendations to the Board regarding the capital improvements program to modernize or replace facilities as recommended by the 2004-05 Citizen’s Ad Hoc Committee. These recommendations, based on specific criteria, led to the Board placing a school improvement bond and capital improvements levy on the ballot in March 2009. Voters did not approve either measure that would have updated 24 facilities and replaced three aging schools. The Board decided to place only a six- year Capital Levy on the ballot in November of 2009, which passed at 55.17%. The levy funded $46.4 million of needed improvement projects at 24 sites over the following seven school years. Planning for the replacement of aging schools was started with educational specifications and schematic design process for the replacement of Auburn High School. The District acquired a site for a future high school in 2008 and a second site for a future middle school in 2009. The District also continued efforts to acquire property around Auburn High School. The Special Education Transition Facility opened in February of 2010. This facility is designed for students with disabilities that are 18 to 21 years old. In the November 2012 election, the community supported the $110 million bond issue for the Auburn High School Modernization and Reconstruction Project at 62%. Construction began in February 2013. The entire new building was occupied by Auburn High School students and staff in the fall of 2015, with site improvements being completed during the 2015-16 school year. Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN 30 In January 2015, a citizen’s ad hoc committee was convened by direction of the Board to address growth and facilities. The major recommendations were to construct two new elementary schools in the next four years and to acquire 3 new elementary school sites as soon as possible. In the November 2016 election, the community supported the $456 million bond issue for the replacement of six schools and the construction of two new elementary schools at 62.83%. Construction for the replacement of Olympic Middle School began in May 2018 and was completed in Fall 2019. Construction for New Elementary School #15 began in May 2019 and will be completed in Fall 2020. Construction for the replacement of Dick Scobee Elementary School began in June 2019 and will be completed in Fall 2020. Construction for New Elementary School #16 and replacement of Pioneer Elementary School began in May 2020 and will be completed in Fall 2021. Within the six-year period, the District is projecting 904 additional students. This increase in student population along with anticipated class-size reductions, will require the construction of a second new elementary school and acquiring one new elementary school site during the six-year window. The table below illustrates the current capital construction plan for the next six years. The exact timelines are wholly dependent on the rate of growth in the school age population. 2020-26 Capital Construction Plan (May 2020) Projected Fund Project Timelines Project Funded Cost Source 20-21 21-22 22-23 23-24 24-25 25-26 26-27 Technology Modernization 2020 Yes $35,000,000 6 Year Cap. Levy 1/ Portable Relocation Yes $1,800,000 Impact Fees XX XX 1/ Property Purchase - 1 New Elementary Yes $7,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX XX XX XX XX Multiple Facility Improvements Yes $46,400,000 Capital Levy XX XX 1/ Elementary #15 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX open 1/ Elementary #16 Yes $48,500,000 Bond Impact Fee XX const XX open 1/ Replacement of five Elementary Schools Yes $242,500,000 Bond XX const XX const XX const XX open 1/ These funds may be secured through a combination of the 2016 Bond Issue, sale of real property, impact fees, and state matching funds. The District currently is eligible for state matching funds for new construction at the elementary school level and for modernization at the elementary and middle school levels. Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section VII Impact Fees Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 32 IMPACT FEE COMPUTATION (Spring 2020) Elementary #16 within 2 year period I. SITE COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre)/Facility Size) x Student Factor Site Cost/ Facility Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)15 $404,337 650 0.2500 0.4330 $2,332.71 $4,040.26 Middle Sch (6 - 8)25 $0 800 0.1310 0.1850 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)40 $0 1500 0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $2,332.71 $4,040.26 II. PERMANENT FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Permanent to Total Square Footage Percentage) Facility Facility % Perm Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$60,200,000 650 0.9430 0.2500 0.4330 $21,833.15 $37,815.02 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0 800 0.9430 0.1310 0.1850 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0 1500 0.9430 0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $21,833.15 $37,815.02 III. TEMPORARY FACILITY CONSTRUCTION COST PER RESIDENCE Formula: ((Facility Cost/Facility Size) x Student Factor) x (Temporary to Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Facility % Temp Sq Ft/Student Generation Factor Cost/Cost/ Single Family Cost Size Total Sq Ft Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$180,000 20.33 0.0570 0.2500 0.4330 $126.26 $218.68 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$180,000 28.02 0.0570 0.1310 0.1850 $48.00 $67.79 Sr High (9 - 12)$180,000 28.74 0.0570 0.1520 0.1750 $54.30 $62.52 $228.55 $348.98 IV. STATE MATCH CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: (Boeckh Index x SPI Footage x District Match x Student Factor) Boeckh SPI State Cost/Cost/ Index Footage Match Single Family Multi Family Single Family Multi Family Elem (K - 5)$238.22 90 66.32%0.2500 0.4330 $3,554.72 $6,156.77 Mid Sch (6 - 8)$0.00 108 66.32%0.1310 0.1850 $0.00 $0.00 Sr High (9 - 12)$0.00 130 66.32%0.1520 0.1750 $0.00 $0.00 $3,554.72 $6,156.78 Student Generation Factor Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 33 V. TAX CREDIT PER RESIDENCE Formula: Expressed as the present value of an annuity TC = PV(interest rate,discount period,average assd value x tax rate) Ave Resid Curr Dbt Serv Bnd Byr Indx Number of Tax Credit Tax Credit Assd Value Tax Rate Ann Int Rate Years Single Family Multi Family Single Family $374,661 $2.41 2.44%10 $7,927.08 Multi Family $160,501 $2.41 2.44%10 $3,395.87 VI. DEVELOPER PROVIDED FACILITY CREDIT Formula: (Value of Site or Facility/Number of dwelling units) Value No. of Units Facility Credit Single Family $0.00 1 $0.00 Multi Family $0.00 1 $0.00 FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multiple SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $2,332.71 $4,040.26 Permanent Facility Const Costs $21,833.15 $37,815.02 Temporary Facility Costs $228.55 $348.98 State Match Credit ($3,554.72)($6,156.78) Tax Credit ($7,927.08)($3,395.87) FEE (No Discount)$12,912.61 $32,651.61 FEE (50% Discount)$6,456.31 $16,325.80 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $0.00 Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $6,456.31 $16,325.80 Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 34 SINGLE FAMILY MULTI FAMILY IMPACT FEE ELEMENTS Elem Mid Sch Sr High Elem Mid Sch Sr High K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 K - 5 6 - 8 9 - 12 Student Factor Single Family - Auburn actual count April 2020 0.250 0.131 0.152 0.433 0.185 0.175 New Fac Capacity 650 800 1500 650 800 1500 New Facility Cost Elementary Cost Estimates April 2020 $60,200,000 $60,200,000 Temp Rm Capacity ASD District Standard of Service.20.33 28.02 28.74 20.33 28.02 28.74 Grades K - 5 @ 20.33, 6 - 8 @ 28.02, & 9 - 12 @ 28.74. Temp Facility Cost Relocatables, including site work, set up, and furnishing.$180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 Site Acreage ASD District Standard or SPI Minimum 12 25 40 12 25 40 Site Cost/Acre See below $404,337 $404,337 $404,337 $404,337 $404,337 $404,337 Perm Sq Footage 14 Elementary, 4 Middle, and 4 High Schools 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 1,700,850 Temp Sq Footage 2 x 768 SF + 24 x 864 SF + 87 x 896 SF + TAP 2661 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 102,885 Total Sq Footage Sum of Permanent and Temporary above 1,803,735 1,803,735 1,803,735 1,803,735 1,803,735 1,803,735 % - Perm Facilities Permanent Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 94.30%94.30%94.30%94.30%94.30%94.30% % - Temp Facilities Temporary Sq. Footage divided by Total Sq. Footage 5.70%5.70%5.70%5.70%5.70%5.70% SPI Sq Ft/Student From OSPI Regulations (WAC 392-343-035)90 108 130 90 108 130 Boeckh Index From OSPI projection for July 2020 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 $238.22 Match % - State From OSPI May 2020 66.32%66.32%66.32%66.32%66.32%66.32% Match % - District Computed 33.68%33.68%33.68%33.68%33.68%33.68% Dist Aver AV King County Department of Assessments March 2020 $374,661 $374,661 $374,661 $160,501 $160,501 $160,501 Debt Serv Tax Rate Current Fiscal Year $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 $2.41 G. O Bond Int Rate Current Rate - (Bond Buyer 20 Index Feb. 2020 avg)2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%2.44%e Site Cost Projections Recent Property Purchase Purchase Purchase Adjusted Projected Annual Sites Latest Date Projected Acquisitions Acreage Year Price Cost/Acre Present Day Inflation Factor Required of Acquisition Cost/Acre Elem. #16 Parcel 1 1.26 2019 $480,000 $382,166 $401,274 5.00%Elementary 2025 $491,474 Elem. #16 Parcel 2 8.19 2019 $2,959,561 $361,363 $379,431 2019 Annual 2020 Annual Elem. #16 Parcel 3 0.80 2018 $460,000 $575,000 $664,125 Inflation Factor Inflation Factor Total 10.25 $3,899,561 $380,593 $404,337 10.00%5% Auburn School District No. 408 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2020 through 2026 35 VII.IMPACT FEE MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR BY CITY OF AUBURN ORDINANCE FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multi-Family Multi-Family Multi-Family Multi-Family Multi-Family SUMMARY Family Studio One Bedroom Two Bedroom Three Bedroom 4 & 5 Bedroom Site Costs $2,332.71 $4,040.26 $4,040.26 $4,040.26 $4,040.26 $4,040.26 Permanent Facility Const Costs $21,833.15 $37,815.02 $37,815.02 $37,815.02 $37,815.02 $37,815.02 Temporary Facility Costs $228.55 $348.98 $348.98 $348.98 $348.98 $348.98 State Match Credit ($3,554.72)($6,156.78)($6,156.78)($6,156.78)($6,156.78)($6,156.78) Tax Credit ($7,927.08)($3,395.87)($3,395.87)($3,395.87)($3,395.87)($3,395.87) FEE (No Discount)$12,912.61 $32,651.61 $32,651.61 $32,651.61 $32,651.61 $32,651.61 FEE (50% Discount)$6,456.31 $16,325.80 $16,325.80 $16,325.80 $16,325.80 $16,325.80 Less ASD Discount $0.00 $10,000.00 $8,000.00 $5,000.00 $2,000.00 $0.00 Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $6,456.31 $6,325.80 $8,325.80 $11,325.80 $14,325.80 $16,325.80 VIII.IMPACT FEE MODIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR BY CITY OF KENT ORDINANCE FEE PER UNIT IMPACT FEES RECAP Single Multiple SUMMARY Family Family Site Costs $2,332.71 $4,040.26 Permanent Facility Const Costs $21,833.15 $37,815.02 Temporary Facility Costs $228.55 $348.98 State Match Credit ($3,554.72)($6,156.78) Tax Credit ($7,927.08)($3,395.87) FEE (No Discount)$12,912.61 $32,651.61 FEE (50% Discount)$6,456.31 $16,325.80 City of Kent Impact Fee Cap $0.00 $7,132.00 Facility Credit $0.00 $0.00 Net Fee Obligation $6,456.31 $9,193.80 Auburn School District No. 408 Capital Facilities Plan 2020 through 2026 Section VIII Appendices Appendix A.1 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Appendix A.2 - Student Generation Survey Appendix A.2 - CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Enrollment Projections Buildout Data for Enrollment Projections-April 2020 38 BASE DATA - BUILDOUT SCHEDULE Student Generation Factors ASSUMPTIONS:Single Multi- 1 Uses Build Out estimates received from developers. 2020 SF 2020 MF Family Family 2 Student Generation Factors are updated Auburn data for 2020 as allowed per King County Ordinance Elementary 0.2500 0.4330 Middle School 0.1310 0.1850 Senior High 0.1520 0.1750 Total 0.5330 0.7930 Table Auburn S.D. 1 Development 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Single Family Units 50 145 155 140 140 140 208 978 Total Single Family Units 50 145 155 140 140 140 208 978 Projected Pupils: K-5 13 36 39 35 35 35 52 245 6-8 7 19 20 18 18 18 27 128 9-12 8 22 24 21 21 21 32 149 K-12 27 77 83 75 75 75 111 521 Multi Family Units 726 24 24 0 0 0 0 774 Total Multi Family Units 726 24 24 0 0 0 0 774 Projected Pupils: K-5 314 10 10 0 0 0 0 335 6-8 134 4 4 0 0 0 0 143 9-12 127 4 4 0 0 0 0 135 K-12 576 19 19 0 0 0 0 614 Total Housing Units 776 169 179 140 140 140 208 1752 K-5 327 47 49 35 35 35 52 580 6-8 141 23 25 18 18 18 27 271 9-12 135 26 28 21 21 21 32 284 K-12 602 96 102 75 75 75 111 1135 Cumulative Projection 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 327 374 423 458 493 528 580 141 164 189 207 226 244 271 135 161 189 210 231 252 284 602 699 800 875 950 1024 1135 Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Total Elementary Pupils Total Elementary - Grades K -5 Mid School - Grades 6 - 8 Senior High - Grades 9 - 12 Total Auburn Factors Elementary Pupils Mid School Pupils Sr. High Pupils Total Appendix A.3 Student Generation Survey 40 SINGLE FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Alicia Glenn 2016 28 28 0 Elementary 16 6 10 13 29 0.214 0.357 0.464 1.036 Anthem (formerly Megan's Meadows)2018 13 13 0 Ilalko 14 4 1 19 1.077 0.308 0.077 1.462 Bridges 380 355 25 Aurthur Jacobsen 69 31 57 157 0.194 0.087 0.161 0.442 Canyon Creek 2018 151 151 0 Evergreen Hts.29 9 9 47 0.192 0.060 0.060 0.311 Dulcinea 2018 6 6 0 Lea Hill 1 2 0 3 0.167 0.333 0.000 0.500 Hastings 10 7 3 Evergreen Hts.0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Hazel View 2018 22 22 0 Lea Hill 8 8 4 20 0.364 0.364 0.182 0.909 Kendall Ridge 2015 106 106 0 Elementary 16 28 13 14 55 0.264 0.123 0.132 0.519 Lakeland East Portola 2015 130 130 0 Bowman Creek 43 26 32 101 0.331 0.200 0.246 0.777 Lakeland Hills Estates 2017 66 66 0 Bowman Creek 21 8 11 40 0.318 0.121 0.167 0.606 Edgeview at Lakeland Hills 2015 368 368 0 Bowman Creek 81 40 50 171 0.220 0.109 0.136 0.465 Lakeland: Pinnacle Estates 2018 99 99 0 Bowman Creek 51 32 24 107 0.515 0.323 0.242 1.081 Villas at Lakeland Hills 2015 81 81 0 Bowman Creek 30 15 7 52 0.370 0.185 0.086 0.642 Lozier Ranch 18 4 14 Chinook 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Monterey Park 2016 238 238 0 Evergreen Hts.50 30 29 109 0.210 0.126 0.122 0.458 Mountain View 2018 55 55 0 Evergreen Hts.6 0 7 13 0.109 0.000 0.127 0.236 Omnia Palisades Plate 16 3 13 Alpac 0 1 1 2 0.000 0.333 0.333 0.667 Seremounte 2019 30 30 0 Aurthur Jacobsen 7 5 8 20 0.233 0.167 0.267 0.667 Sonata Hills 2017 69 69 0 Lea Hill 10 2 8 20 0.145 0.029 0.116 0.290 Spencer Place 2017 13 13 0 Hazelwood 10 7 3 20 0.769 0.538 0.231 1.538 Vasiliy 8 1 7 Terminal Park 0 0 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Willow Place 11 10 1 Elementary 16 0 0 4 4 0.000 0.000 0.400 0.400 Totals 1918 1855 63 464 243 282 989 0.250 0.131 0.152 0.533 Year of Full OccupancyDevelopment Name Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Actual Students Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment) Student Generation FactorsFeeder Elementary 41 SINGLE FAMILY--2020 and beyond Middle HS Total Anderson Acres 14 0 14 2 2 7 Backbone Ridge 7 0 7 1 1 4 Bridle Estates 18 0 18 2 3 10 Hastings 10 *10 0 10 1 2 5 Greenvale 17 0 17 2 3 Lakeland: Forest Glen At ..30 0 30 4 5 16 Lakeland: Park Ridge 256 0 256 34 39 136 Lakeland: River Rock*14 0 14 2 2 7 Pacific Lane 11 0 11 1 2 6 Ridge At Tall Timbers 104 0 104 14 16 55 Richardson BLA/Plat 6 0 6 1 1 3 Huntionton Woods 74 0 74 10 11 39 Topaz Short Plat 4 0 4 1 1 2 Oxbow Acres 3 0 3 0 0 2 Wyncrest II 41 0 41 5 6 22 Wesport Capital 306 0 306 40 47 163 Current Partially Occupied Developments 1918 1855 63 8 10 34 2833 978 Totals 128 149 521 * currently under construction 3 Development Name Current Occupancy Elem Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on Oct 1, 2019 Enrollment) Units/ Parcels To Be Occupied 245 77 19 2 1 1 10 4 26 16 Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors 4 2 5 3 8 64 4 Auburn School District Development Growth since 1/1/15 May 2020 (Based on October 1, 2019 Enrollment) 42 MULTI FAMILY Elem Middle HS Total Elem Middle HS Total Promenade Apts 2018 294 294 0 Lea Hill 205 98 90 393 0.697 0.333 0.306 1.337 The Villas at Auburn 2018 295 295 0 Washington 50 11 13 74 0.169 0.037 0.044 0.251 Totals 589 589 0 255 109 103 467 0.433 0.185 0.175 0.793 2020 and beyond Sundallen Condos 48 0 48 21 9 8 38 Auburn Town Center Apt 226 0 226 98 42 40 179 Copper Gate Apt.500 0 500 216 93 87 396 Current Partially Occupied Developments 589 589 0 0 0 0 0 1363 774 Total 335 143 135 614 Estimated Students Based on Student Generation Factors Student Generation FactorsUnits/ Parcels Current Occupancy Units/ Parcels Current Occupancy To Be Occupied Development Name To Be Occupied Actual Students Feeder Elementary Year of Full Occupancy -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 15 Exhibit E.2 Federal Way School District Capital Facility Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 Lake Grove Elementary School Mirror Lake Elementary School Wildwood Elementary School Thomas Jefferson High School FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN June 5, 2020 BOARD OF EDUCATION Trudy Davis Hiroshi Eto Dr. Jennifer Jones Geoffery McAnalloy Luckisha Phillips SUPERINTENDENT Dr. Tammy Campbell Prepared by: Sally D. McLean, Chief Finance & Operations Officer Jennifer Thomas, Student & Demographic Forecaster FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2-3 SECTION 1 THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN Introduction 4 Inventory of Educational Facilities 5 Inventory of Non-Instructional Facilities 6 Needs Forecast - Existing Facilities 7 Needs Forecast - New Facilities 8 Six Year Finance Plan 9 SECTION 2 MAPS Introduction 10 Map – City and County Jurisdictions 11 SECTION 3 SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Introduction 12 Building Capacities 13-15 Portable Locations 16-17 Student Forecast 18-20 SECTION 4 KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Introduction 21 Capacity Summaries 22-26 Impact Fee Calculations 27-28 Reference to Impact Fee Calculations 29-30 Student Generation Rates 31 Impact Fee Changes from 2020 to 2021 32 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2 INTRODUCTION In response to the requirements of the State of Washington Growth Management Act (SHB) 2929 (1990) and ESHB 1025 (1991)), and under the School Impact Fee Ordinances of King County Code 21A, City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 effective December 21, 1995 as amended, City of Kent Ordinance No.4278 effective June 2018, revised January 2020, and the City of Auburn Ordinance No. 5078 effective 1998, Federal Way Public Schools has updated its Capital Facilities Plan as of June 2020. This plan is scheduled to be submitted for consideration to each of the jurisdictions located with the Federal Way Public Schools’ service area: King County, the City of Kent, City of Federal Way and the City of Auburn and is incorporated in the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction by reference. This plan is requested to be included in the Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. To date, the City of Des Moines has not adopted a school impact fee ordinance. The City of Des Moines collects school impact fees as part of the SEPA process. Discussions with the City of Milton to adopt an ordinance for school impact fees for parcels located within the Federal Way School District’s service area is in process. The Growth Management Act requires the County to designate Urban Growth areas within which urban growth can be encouraged. The Growth Management Planning Council adopted and recommended to the King County Council for Urban Growth Area Line Maps with designations for urban centers. A designation was made within the Federal Way planning area, which encompasses Federal Way Public Schools boundaries. King County will encourage and actively support the development of Urban Centers to meet the region’s need for housing, jobs, services, culture, and recreation. This Plan’s estimated population growth is prepared with this underlying assumption. This Capital Facilities Plan will be used as documentation for any jurisdiction, which requires its use to meet the needs of the Growth Management Act. This plan is not intended to be the sole planning tool for all of the District needs. The District may prepare interim plans consistent with Board policies or management need. During the 2016-17 school year the District formed a 100 member Facilities Planning Committee consisting of parents, community members and staff. The Committee was tasked with developing a recommendation to the Superintendent regarding Phase 2 of the District’s plan for school construction, remodeling, and/or modernization for voter consideration in November 2017. The voters passed this $450M bond authorization with a 62% YES vote reflecting a commitment to invest in the modernization of our infrastructure. Through the committee’s work a determination was made to rebuild Thomas Jefferson High School, Illahee Middle School, Totem Middle School, Lake Grove Elementary, Mirror Lake Elementary, Olympic View Elementary, Star Lake Elementary, and Wildwood Elementary. In addition to the school projects, the committee included a plan to modernize Memorial Stadium, which currently supports athletic activities for all schools. The rebuilding of the schools will create additional capacity for students at the elementary and high school levels. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 3 INTRODUCTION, continued The District continues to monitor factors that may have an impact on enrollment and capacity at our schools, including new single-family and multi-family residential developments and any impacts due to the COVID-19 stay home order. In accordance with the McCleary decision, the State has provided funding to reduce K-3 class size to 17 and 4-12 class size to 25. Beginning in 2019-20 the legislature expects compliance with this funding adding pressure to the need for elementary capacity. In response to this need the district has acquired a commercial building to renovate into classrooms to provide permanent additional capacity. We will also continue to study school boundaries as new housing and fluctuating populations impact specific schools. Some shifts in boundaries may be required in the coming years. At this time with more than 1,000 unhoused elementary students, boundary adjustments cannot resolve the need for additional capacity. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 4 SECTION 1 - THE CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The State Growth Management Act requires that several pieces of information be gathered to determine the facilities available and needed to meet the needs of a growing community. This section provides information about current facilities, existing facility needs, and expected future facility requirements for Federal Way Public Schools. A Financial Plan that shows expected funding for any new construction, portables and modernization listed follows this. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 5 INVENTORY OF EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (K-5) Adelaide 1635 SW 304th St Federal Way 98023 Brigadoon 3601 SW 336th St Federal Way 98023 Camelot 4041 S 298th St Auburn 98001 Enterprise 35101 5th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Green Gables 32607 47th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Lake Dolloff 4200 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lake Grove 303 SW 308th St Federal Way 98023 Lakeland 35827 32nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Mark Twain 2450 S Star Lake Rd Federal Way 98003 Meredith Hill 5830 S 300th St Auburn 98001 Mirror Lake 625 S 314th St Federal Way 98003 Nautilus (K-8) 1000 S 289th St Federal Way 98003 Olympic View 2626 SW 327th St Federal Way 98023 Panther Lake 34424 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Rainier View 3015 S 368th St Federal Way 98003 Sherwood Forest 34600 12th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Silver Lake 1310 SW 325th Pl Federal Way 98023 Star Lake 4014 S 270th St Kent 98032 Sunnycrest 24629 42nd Ave S Kent 98032 Twin Lakes 4400 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Valhalla 27847 42nd Ave S Auburn 98001 Wildwood 2405 S 300th St Federal Way 98003 Woodmont (K-8) 26454 16th Ave S Des Moines 98198 MIDDLE SCHOOLS (6-8) Federal Way Public Academy (6-10) 34620 9th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Illahee 36001 1st Ave S Federal Way 98003 Kilo 4400 S 308th St Auburn 98001 Lakota 1415 SW 314th St Federal Way 98023 Sacajawea 1101 S Dash Point Rd Federal Way 98003 Sequoyah 3450 S 360th ST Auburn 98001 Totem 26630 40th Ave S Kent 98032 TAF @ Saghalie (6-12) 33914 19th Ave SW Federal Way 98023 HIGH SCHOOLS (9-12) Decatur 2800 SW 320th St Federal Way 98023 Federal Way 30611 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Thomas Jefferson 4248 S 288th St Auburn 98001 Todd Beamer 35999 16th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Career Academy at Truman 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 ADDITIONAL SCHOOLS Internet Academy (K-12) 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Employment Transition Program (12+) 33250 21st Ave SW Federal Way 98023 Federal Way Open Doors 31455 28th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Former DeVry Property (K-5) 3600 S 344th Way, Federal Way 98001 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 6 CURRENT INVENTORY NON-INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITIES Developed Property Central Kitchen 1214 S 332nd Federal Way 98003 Federal Way Memorial Field 1300 S 308th St Federal Way 98003 Educational Services Center 33330 8th Ave S Federal Way 98003 Support Services Center 1211 S 332nd St Federal Way 98003 Leased Property Early Learning Center at Uptown Square 1066 S 320th St Federal Way 98003 Undeveloped Property Site # Location 75 SW 360th Street & 3rd Avenue SW – 9.2 Acres 65 S 351st Street & 52nd Avenue S – 8.8 Acres 60 E of 10th Avenue SW - SW 334th & SW 335th Streets - 10.04 Acres 73 N of SW 320th and east of 45th PL SW – 23.45 Acres 71 S 344th Street & 46th Avenue S - 17.47 Acres 82 1st Way S and S 342nd St – Minimal acreage 96 S 308th St and 14th Ave S – .36 Acres Notes: Not all undeveloped properties are large enough to meet school construction requirements. Properties may be traded or sold depending on what locations are needed to house students in the District. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 7 NEEDS FORECAST - EXISTING FACILITIES PHASE EXISTING FACILITY FUTURE NEEDS ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS As needed Purchase and Relocate Portables Interim Capacity Anticipated source of funds is Impact Fees. II Thomas Jefferson High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Illahee Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Totem Middle School Replace Existing Building Voter Approved Capital bond II Lake Grove Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Mark Twain Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD, pending SCAP funding II Mirror Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Olympic View K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Star Lake Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Wildwood Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity Voter Approved Capital bond II Memorial Stadium Replace Existing Facility Voter Approved Capital bond II DeVry Property Temp Swing School Increase Capacity SCAP and K-3 Class size reduction funding III Decatur High School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Kilo Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Sacajawea Middle School Replace Existing Building TBD III Adelaide Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Brigadoon Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Camelot Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Lake Dolloff Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Nautilus K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Twin Lakes Elementary Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD III Woodmont K-8 School Replace Existing Building, Increase Capacity TBD As part of the multi-phase modernization and replacement plan, the District intends to increase capacity for elementary and high school students with expansion at the Thomas Jefferson, Lake Grove, Mirror Lake, Olympic View, Star Lake, and Wildwood sites. Only projects in Phase II with plans to increase capacity are included in the impact fee calculation for this plan. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 8 NEEDS FORECAST - ADDITIONAL FACILITIES NEW FACILITY LOCATION ANTICIPATED SOURCE OF FUNDS No current plans for additional facilities. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 9 Six Year Finance Plan Six Year Finance Plan Secured Funding Sources Impact Fees (1)$576,280 Land Sale Funds (2)($1,502,782) Bond or Levy Funds (3)$305,641,132 K3-CSR & TAFA unclaimed expenditures ($356,454) School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (4)($1,810,820) TOTAL $302,547,356 Projected Revenue Sources School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP) (5)$122,289,000 K-3 Class Size Reduction (6)$10,821,352 Bond Funds (7)$115,000,000 Land Fund Sales (8)$0 Impact Fees (9)$3,600,000 TOTAL $251,710,352 Actual and Planned Expenditures Total Secured Funding and Projected Revenue $554,257,708 NEW SCHOOLS Estimated and Budget 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Total Cost Prior Years 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2020-2027 MODERNIZATION AND EXPANSION Lake Grove Elementary (10)$34,189,000 $8,611,000 $8,611,000 $42,800,000 Mirror Lake Elementary (10)$35,355,000 $9,145,000 $9,145,000 $44,500,000 Star Lake Elementary (10)$7,135,000 $24,259,000 $10,106,000 $34,365,000 $41,500,000 Wildwood Elementary (10)$34,097,000 $8,603,000 $8,603,000 $42,700,000 Olympic View K-8 School (10)$2,500,000 $25,900,000 $24,600,000 $53,000,000 $53,000,000 Thomas Jefferson High School (10)$45,653,000 $40,000,000 $47,947,000 $87,947,000 $133,600,000 Totem Middle School (10)$11,229,000 $40,000,000 $17,571,000 $57,571,000 $68,800,000 Illahee Middle School (10)$6,600,000 $28,700,000 $45,000,000 $80,300,000 $80,300,000 Memorial Stadium (10)$1,800,000 $25,100,000 $26,900,000 $26,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 SITE ACQUISITION Former DeVry/ES 24 (11)$16,919,121 $1,420,500 $1,424,750 $1,421,500 $1,421,000 $1,423,000 $1,422,250 $1,423,750 $9,956,750 $26,875,871 TEMPORARY FACILITIES Portables (12)$200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $800,000 $800,000 TOTAL $184,577,121 $132,038,500 $79,548,750 $33,921,500 $54,921,000 $46,623,000 $3,422,250 $26,723,750 $377,198,750 $561,775,871 NOTES:` 1. These fees are currently being held in a King County, City of Federal Way, City of Auburn, and City of Kent impact fee account, and will be available for use by the District for system improvements. This is year end balance on 12/31/19. 2. This is year end balance on 12/31/19. 3. This is the 12/31/19 balance of bond funds and capital levy funds. This figure includes interest earnings. 4. This represents the balance due to FWPS from OSPI for School Construction Assistance Program funds spent through December 31, 2019. 5. This is anticipated SCAP for the future projects authorized by the voters in 2017, less payments received to-date 6. This is a secured K-3 Class size reduction grant. 7. In November 2017, the District passed a $450M bond measure. The amount included in the finance plan is for projects that will create additional capacity. Only the costs associated with increasing capacity are included in school impact fee calculations. 8. There are no projected sale of surplus properties. 9. These are projected fees based upon anticipated residential developments in the District, estimated at $50,000 per month over the next 6 years. 10. Project budgets are updated as of April 2020 and reflective of actual Guaranteed Price Maximums for all but Illahee Middle School and Olympic View K-8 11. A former private university campus located in Federal Way was purchased this year to provide up to 43 additional permanent elementary classrooms. Prior to creating new permanent capcity this location will be used as a temporary housing. These costs of the site acquisition are included in the school impact fee calculations 12. These fees represent the cost of purchasing and installing new portables. The portable expenditure in future years may replace existing portables that are not functional. These may not increase capacity and are not included in the capacity summary. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 10 SECTION 2 - MAPS Federal Way Public Schools has twenty-one elementary schools (grades K-5), two schools with a K-8 grade configuration, six middle school schools (grades 6-8), four high schools (grades 9-12) and four small secondary schools. The Federal Way Public Academy serves students in grades 6-10. The programs at Open Doors and Career Academy at Truman High School serves students in grades 9-12. In addition to these programs, TAF@Saghalie serves students in grades 6-12 who reside within the service area and the Employment and Transition Program (ETP) at the Norman Center serves 18-21 year old scholars. The Growth Management Act requires that a jurisdiction evaluate if the public facility infrastructure is in place to handle new housing developments. In the case of most public facilities, new development has its major impact on the facilities immediately adjacent to that development. School districts are different. If the district does not have permanent facilities available, interim measures must be taken until new facilities can be built or until boundaries can be adjusted to match the population changes to the surrounding facilities. It is important to realize that a single housing development does not require the construction of a complete school facility. School districts are required to project growth throughout the district and build or adjust boundaries based on growth throughout the district, not just around a single development. Adjusting boundaries requires careful consideration by the district and is not taken lightly. It is recognized that there is a potential impact on students who are required to change schools. Boundary adjustments impact the whole district, not just one school. The final map included represents the city and county boundaries which overlap with the district’s service areas. • City of Algona • City of Auburn • City of Des Moines • City of Federal Way • City of Kent • City of Milton • Unincorporated King County FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 11 MAP – CITY AND COUNTY JURISDICTIONS FWPS boundaries is 100% Urban Growth Area FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 12 SECTION 3 - SUPPORT DOCUMENTATION Building Capacities - The Education Program Portable Locations Student Forecast – 2021 through 2027 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 13 BUILDING CAPACITIES This Capital Facilities Plan establishes the District’s “standard of service” in order to ascertain the District’s current and future capacity. The Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, but these guidelines do not take into consideration the education program needs. In general, the District’s current target class size provides that the average class size for a standard classroom for grades K through 3 should be 17 students to comply with current legislation. In grades 4-5 the target is 25 students. For grades 6 to 12 the target class size is 26 students. Classrooms for students with Individualized Education Program (Special Education) needs are calculated at 12 seats per classroom. Historically, the District has used the OSPI square footage calculation as a baseline for capacity calculation and made adjustments for specific program needs. The District will continue to use this calculation for determining capacity at our middle and high schools. However, for elementary schools capacity will be calculated based on the number of classroom spaces and the number of students assigned to each classroom. Class Size Guidelines FWPS Historical “Standard of Service” HB2661/SHB2776 Enacted Law Square Footage Guideline Kindergarten 18.9 17 25-28 Grades 1-2 18.9 17 25-28 Grade 3 18.9 17 28 Grades 4-5 25 25 28 For the purposes of determining student capacity at individual schools, the following list clarifies adjustments to classroom spaces and the OSPI calculation. Special Education Resource Rooms: Each middle school requires the use of a standard classroom(s) for special education students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. English as a Second Language Programs: Each middle school and high school requires the use of a standard classroom for students learning English as a second language. Middle School Computer Labs: Each middle school has computer labs, except Totem Middle School. Wireless access has been installed at all secondary schools. If additional classroom space is needed, these computer labs may be converted to mobile carts. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 14 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued High School Career Development and Learning Center (Resource) Room: Each high school provides special education resource room and career development classrooms for students requiring instruction to address specific disabilities. Preschool/ECEAP/Headstart: Our district currently offers preschool programs for both special needs & typically developing students at 9 elementary schools. We also have ECEAP and Headstart program at 10 sites (4 elementary schools, 1 middle school, 2 high schools, and 2 commercial sites). These programs decrease capacity at those schools. Alternative Learning Experience: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in an Alternative Learning Experience through our Internet Academy. These students have never been included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. 1418 Youth Reengagement: Federal Way offers students the opportunity to participate in 1418 Youth Reengagement Open Doors program. These students are housed at the Truman campus but are not currently included in the capacity calculation of unhoused students. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 15 BUILDING CAPACITIES, continued ELEMENTARY BUILDING MIDDLE SCHOOL BUILDING PROGRAM CAPACITY PROGRAM CAPACITY School Name Headcount 1 Preschool School Name Headcount Adelaide 353 30 Illahee 855 Brigadoon 299 30 Kilo 779 Camelot 277 30 Lakota 786 Enterprise 345 15 Sacajawea 694 Green Gables 401 Sequoyah 585 Lake Dolloff 400 Totem 795 3 Lake Grove 600 TAF @ Saghalie 598 Lakeland 371 Federal Way Public Academy 183 Mark Twain 430 TOTAL 5,275 Meredith Hill 375 30 3 Mirror Lake 600 *Middle School Average 727 Nautilus (K-8)466 Olympic View 353 HIGH SCHOOL BUILDING Panther Lake 347 PROGRAM CAPACITY Rainier View 405 30 Sherwood Forest 390 6 School Name Headcount Silver Lake 400 Decatur 1243 Star Lake 337 Federal Way 1684 Sunnycrest 405 Thomas Jefferson 1224 Twin Lakes 341 30 Todd Beamer 1085 Valhalla 406 TAF @ Saghalie 155 3 Wildwood 600 30 Career Academy at Truman 159 Woodmont (K-8)357 Federal Way Public Academy 116 TOTAL 9,258 231 Employment Transition Program 48 TOTAL 5,714 Elementary Average 403 2 High School Average 1,309 Notes: 1 Preschool enrollment reduces capacity for K-5 students. 15 preschool students in one classroom. 2 Federal Way Public Academy, Career Academy at Truman High School, and Employment Transition Program 3 Lake Grove and Wildwood are scheduled to open January 2021; Mirror Lake is scheduled to open September 2021 and TAF @ Saghalie for the high school school grade span (9-12) are non-boundary schools. These schools are not used in the calculated averages. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 16 PORTABLE LOCATIONS The Washington State Constitution requires the State to provide each student a basic education. It is not an efficient use of District resources to build a school with a capacity for 500 students due to lack of space for 25 students when enrollment fluctuates throughout the year and from year to year. Portables are used as interim measures to house students when increasing population impacts a school attendance area. Portables may also be required to house students when new or changing programs require additional capacity. They also provide housing for students until permanent facilities can be financed and constructed. When permanent facilities become available, the portable(s) is either used for other purposes such as storage or child care programs, or moved to another school for an interim classroom. Some portables may not be fit to move due to age or physical condition. In these cases, the District may choose to buy new portables and surplus these unfit portables. With the launch of construction of new schools, a number of portables will be relocated, decommissioned, or sold. These numbers are not available at this time. The following page provides a list of the location of the portable facilities, used for educational facilities by Federal Way Public Schools. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 17 PORTABLE LOCATIONS, continued PORTABLES LOCATED PORTABLES LOCATED AT ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS AT HIGH SCHOOLS NON NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Adelaide 2 1 Decatur 8 Brigadoon 1 Federal Way Camelot 1 Thomas Jefferson 6 Enterprise 3 Todd Beamer 8 Green Gables 1 TOTAL 22 Lake Dolloff 4 1 Lake Grove Lakeland Mark Twain 3 Meredith Hill 3 PORTABLES LOCATED Mirror Lake AT SUPPORT FACILITIES Nautilus 3 Olympic View 2 MOT Panther Lake 4 TDC 9 Rainier View 5 Former TAFA Sherwood Forest 2 2 TOTAL 9 Silver Lake 1 3 Star Lake Sunnycrest 6 DISTRICT PORTABLES IN USE FOR ECEAP Twin Lakes 1 2 AND/OR HEADSTART Valhalla 4 Sherwood Forest 1 Wildwood Totem Woodmont 3 Total 1 TOTAL 49 9 PORTABLES LOCATED AT MIDDLE SCHOOLS NON INSTRUCTIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL Illahee 2 1 Kilo 1 6 Lakota Sacajawea 4 Sequoyah 2 Totem TAF@ Saghalie 4 TOTAL 13 7 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 18 STUDENT FORECAST Student enrollment projections are a basic component of budget development. Enrollment projections influence many of the financial estimates that go into budget preparation. The majority of staffing requirements are derived directly from the forecasted number of students. Allocations for instructional supplies and materials are also made on the basis of projected enrollment. Other expenditures and certain revenue projections are directly related to enrollment projections. Enrollment projections are completed annually in the Business Services Department. Projections must be detailed at various levels, district total, school-building totals, grade level and program level to include vocational and special education students. The basis of projections has been cohort survival analysis. Cohort survival is the analysis of a group that has a common statistical value (grade level) as it progresses through time. In a stable population the cohort would be 1.00 for all grades. This analysis uses historical information to develop averages and project the averages forward. This method does not trace individual students; it is concerned with aggregate numbers in each grade level. The district has used this method with varying years of history and weighted factors to study several projections. Because transfers in and out of the school system are common, student migration is factored into the analysis as it increases or decreases survival rates. Entry grades (kindergarten) are a unique problem in cohort analysis. The district collects information on birth rates within the district’s census tracts and treats these statistics as a cohort for kindergarten enrollment in the appropriate years. The Federal Way School District is using various statistical methods for projecting student enrollments. The resultant forecasted enrollments are evaluated below. The first method is a statistical cohort analysis that produces ten distinct forecasts. These are forecast of enrollment for one year. The projections vary depending on the number of years of historical information and how they are weighted. A second method is a projection using an enrollment projection software package that allows the user to project independently at school or grade level and to aggregate these projections for the district level. The Enrollment MasterTM software provides statistical methods including trend line, standard grade progression (cohort) and combinations of these methods. This software produces a five-year projection of school enrollment. In February 2018, the District contracted a demographer to develop projections for the Federal Way School District. The report was complete in March 2018. The model used to forecast next year’s enrollment uses cohort survival rates to measure grade to grade growth, assumes market share losses to private schools (consistent with county-wide average), assumes growth from new housing or losses due to net losses from migration. This forecast was provided as a range of three projections. The long-range forecast provided with this report used a model with cohort survival rates and growth rates based on projected changes in the 5-19 age group for King County. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 19 STUDENT FORECAST, continued Most of the methods used for long range enrollment reporting assume that enrollment is a constant percent of something else (e.g. population) or that enrollment will mirror some projected trend for the school-age population over time. The report included 5 different calculations to provide a range of possible projections for the District to the year 2026. This model produces a projection that is between 21,500 and 25,000 when applied to the low, medium and high range modes. This provides a reasonable range for long-range planning and is consistent with estimates from various models. Long-range projections that establish the need for facilities are a modification of the cohort survival method. The cohort method of analysis becomes less reliable the farther out the projections are made. The Federal Way School District long-range projections are studied annually. The study includes information from the jurisdictional demographers as they project future housing and population in the region. The long-range projections used by Federal Way Public Schools reflect a similar age trend in student populations as the projections published by the Office of Financial Management for the State of Washington. Near term projections assume some growth from new housing, which is offset by current local economic conditions. The District tracks new development from five permitting jurisdictions. Long range planning assumes a student yield from proposed new housing consistent with historical growth patterns. Growth Management requires jurisdictions to plan for a minimum of twenty years. The Federal Way School District is a partner in this planning with the various jurisdictions comprising the school district geography. These projections create a vision of the school district community in the future. In school year 2018-19, King County as a whole experienced unusual enrollment patterns. We continue to monitor this closely. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 20 STUDENT FORECAST, continued Percent Calendar Yr School Year Elementary Middle School High School Total K -12 Change 2014 2013-14 10,131 4,848 6,799 21,778 2015 2014-15 9,998 4,931 6,825 21,754 -0.1% 2016 2015-16 10,206 5,094 6,695 21,995 1.1% 2017 2016-17 10,424 5,033 6,476 21,933 -0.3% 2018 2017-18 10,418 5,159 6,338 21,915 -0.1% 2019 2018-19 10,158 5,115 6,443 21,716 -0.9% 2020 2019-20 9,953 5,309 6,322 21,584 -0.6% 2021 B2020-21 9,887 5,336 6,370 21,593 0.0% 2022 P2021-22 9,946 5,368 6,408 21,723 0.6% 2023 P2022-23 10,046 5,422 6,472 21,940 1.0% 2024 P2023-24 10,156 5,481 6,543 22,181 1.1% 2025 P2024-25 10,238 5,525 6,596 22,359 0.8% 2026 P2025-26 10,319 5,569 6,649 22,537 1.6% 2027 P2026-27 10,443 5,636 6,728 22,808 2.0% Elementary K-5 Middle School 6-8 High School 9-12 Excludes Full-time Running Start and Open Doors Enrollment October 1 Head Count Enrollment History and Projections *2020-21 projections from SM projections, brick and mortar schools. Does not include alternative (IA, ETP, PTC, Support). Does include Truman. 20,000 20,500 21,000 21,500 22,000 22,500 School Year Enrollment History and Six Year Forecast #R… FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 21 SECTION 4 – KING COUNTY, CITY OF FEDERAL WAY, AND CITY OF KENT IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Capacity Summaries Site & Construction Costs Allocations Student Generation Rates Impact Fee Calculations Reference to Impact Fee Calculations FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 22 CAPACITY SUMMARIES All Grades, Elementary, Middle School, and High Schools The Capacity Summaries combine Building Capacity information, Portable Capacity information and the Student Forecast information. The result demonstrates the requirements for new or remodeled facilities and why there is a need for the District to use temporary facilities or interim measures. The District has recently adjusted its capacity calculation method for Elementary schools to better show capacity needed to comply with the K-3 Class Size Reduction. This adjustment is also shown in the portable capacity calculation. In order to allow for flexibility in portable usage the District will use an average class size calculation of 21 for each Elementary portable and an average class size of 25 for each Middle and High School portable. The information is organized with a page summarizing the entire District, and then evaluating capacity vs. number of students at elementary, middle school, and high school levels individually. The notes at the bottom of each spreadsheet provide information about what facilities are in place each year. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 23 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – All Grades Budget Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 CAPACITY School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 19,434 20,005 20,242 20,380 21,077 21,077 21,077 Add Capacity 571 237 138 697 0 0 0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 20,005 20,242 20,380 21,077 21,077 21,077 21,077 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 21,593 21,723 21,940 22,181 22,359 22,537 22,808 Internet Academy Headcount Enrollment1 (255)(255)(255)(255)(255)(255)(255) Basic FTE Enrollment without Internet Academy 21,338 21,468 21,685 21,926 22,104 22,282 22,553 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM FTE CAPACITY (1,333)(1,226)(1,305)(849)(1,027)(1,205)(1,476) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY Current Portable Capacity 2,360 1,929 1,654 1,654 1,612 1,562 1,562 Add/Subtract Portable Capacity (431)(275)0 (42)(50)0 0 Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,929 1,654 1,654 1,612 1,562 1,562 1,562 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 596 428 349 763 535 357 86 NOTES: 1 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. - - Projected - - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 24 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – Elementary Schools Budget Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 CAPACITY School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 BUILDING PROGRAM HEAD COUNT CAPACITY 8,445 9,016 9,016 9,154 9,851 9,851 9,851 Add/Subtract capacity total 571 0 138 697 0 0 0 Add capacity at1: Lake Grove 247 Mirror Lake 196 Star Lake 138 Wildwood 128 De Vry 697 Olympic View K-8 0 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 9,016 9,016 9,154 9,851 9,851 9,851 9,851 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 9,887 9,946 10,046 10,156 10,238 10,319 10,443 Internet Academy Headcount2 (20)(20)(20)(20)(20)(20)(20) Basic Headcount Enrollment without Internet Academy 9,867 9,926 10,026 10,136 10,218 10,299 10,423 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (851)(910)(872)(285)(367)(448)(572) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 Current Portable Capacity 1,260 1,029 1,029 1,029 987 987 987 Add/Subtract portable capacity (231)0 0 (42)0 0 0 Add portable capacity at: Subtract portable capacity at: Lake Grove (21) Mirror Lake (126) Star Lake Wildwood (84) Olympic View K-8 (42) Adjusted Portable Capacity 1,029 1,029 1,029 987 987 987 987 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 178 119 157 702 620 539 415 NOTES: 1 Capacity increases are projected based on a design to accommodate 600 students -- as design is completed these may beadjusted in future iterations of this plan. Increased capacity is currently stated as the difference between current calculatedcapacity and the projected design. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. - - Projected - - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 25 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – Middle Schools Budget Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 CAPACITY School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 Add/Subtract capacity 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Add capacity at: Totem 1 Illahee Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 5,275 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 5,336 5,368 5,422 5,481 5,525 5,569 5,636 Internet Academy2 (55)(55)(55)(55)(55)(55)(55) Basic Enrollment without Internet Academy 5,281 5,313 5,367 5,426 5,470 5,514 5,581 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (6)(38)(92)(151)(195)(239)(306) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 Current Portable Capacity 450 350 325 325 325 275 275 Add/Subtract portable capacity (100)(25)0 0 (50)0 0 Totem Middle School (100) Sacajawea Middle School (25) Illahee Middle School (50) Adjusted Portable Capacity 350 325 325 325 275 275 275 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY 344 287 233 174 80 36 (31) NOTES: 1 Totem and Illahee Middle Schools currently have capacity for 800 & 850 students respectively, so no new capacity is anticipated with the rebuild of this older buildings. 2 Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 3 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. - - Projected - - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 26 CAPACITY SUMMARIES, Continued Capacity Summary – High Schools Budget Calendar Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 CAPACITY School Year 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 BUILDING PROGRAM HEADCOUNT CAPACITY 5,714 5,714 6,188 6,188 6,188 6,188 6,188 Add/Subtract capacity 0 237 0 0 0 0 0 Thomas Jefferson High School 4 237 Adjusted Program Headcount Capacity 5,714 6,188 6,188 6,188 6,188 6,188 6,188 ENROLLMENT Basic Headcount Enrollment 6,370 6,408 6,472 6,543 6,596 6,649 6,728 Internet Academy1 (180)(180)(180)(180)(180)(180)(180) Basic Ed without Internet Academy 6,190 6,228 6,292 6,363 6,416 6,469 6,548 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM CAPACITY (476)(40)(104)(175)(228)(281)(360) RELOCATABLE CAPACITY2 Current Portable Capacity 650 550 300 300 300 300 300 Add/Subtract portable capacity (100)(250)0 0 0 0 0 Thomas Jefferson High School 4 (100)(250) Adjusted Portable Capacity 550 300 300 300 300 300 300 SURPLUS OR (UNHOUSED) PROGRAM AND RELOCATABLE CAPACITY3 74 260 196 125 72 19 (60) NOTES: 1.Internet Academy students are included in projections but do not require full time use of school facilities. 2 Relocatable Capacity is based on the number of portables available and other administrative techniques which can be used to temporarily house students until permanent facilities are available. This is a calculated number only. The actual number of portables that will be used will be based on actual student population needs. The District may begin to pull portables from the instructional inventory. Age and condition of the portables will determine feasibility for continued instructional use. 3.Capacity for unhoused students will be accommodated with traveling teachers and no planning time in some classrooms. 4 Current project timelines estimate the completion of Thomas Jefferson HS opening in the fall of 2022. - - Projected - - FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 27 IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Single and Multi-Family Residences Each jurisdiction that imposes school impact fees requires that developers pay these fees to help cover a share of the impact of new housing developments on school facilities. To determine an equitable fee throughout unincorporated King County, a formula was established. This formula can be found in King County Code 21A and was substantially adopted by the City of Auburn, Federal Way and Kent. The formula requires the District to establish a "Student Generation Factor" which estimates how many students will be added to a school district by each new single or multi-family unit and to gather some standard construction costs, which are unique to that district. Impact Fee Calculation On page 30, the 2021 variables for the calculation of the Impact Fee for single family and multi-family units based on King County Code 21A and the Growth Management Act, generate the results below: Plan Year 2020 Plan Year 2021 Single Family Units $5,035 $3,243 Multi-Family Units $20,768 $16,003 Mixed-Use Residential 1 $10,384 $8,001 Impact Fee Calculation - King County Code 21A The Impact Fees have changed as a result of changes in several factors. The updates made to the variables in the Impact Fee calculation, generate a change in the Impact Fee between the 2020 Capital Facilities Plan and the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan. A summary of these changes can be found on page 32 and a year over year comparison of formula variables can be found on page 33. 1 In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 28 IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Impact Fee Calculations School Site Acquisition Cost:Student Student Facility Cost /Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Acreage Acre Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 11.97 $384,077 697 0.1809 0.5064 $1,193 $3,340 Middle School 0.0691 0.2523 $0 $0 High School 0.0987 0.2523 $0 $0 TOTAL $1,193 $3,340 School Construction Cost:Student Student % Perm Fac./Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 94.09%$39,486,883 709 0.1809 0.5064 $9,480 $26,537 Middle School 97.26%0.0691 0.2523 High School 96.98%$16,236,550 237 0.0987 0.2523 $6,558 $16,763 TOTAL $16,037 $43,299 Temporary Facility Cost:Student Student % Temp Fac.Facility Facility Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Total Sq Ft Cost Capacity SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary 5.91%0.1809 0.5064 $0 $0 Middle School 2.74%0.0691 0.2523 $0 $0 High School 3.02%0.0987 0.2523 $0 $0 TOTAL $0 $0 School Construction Assistance Program Credit Calculation Student Student Construction Cost Sq. Ft.State Factor Factor Cost/Cost/ Allocation/Sq Ft Student Match SFR MFR SFR MFR Elementary $238.22 90 64.71%0.1809 0.5064 $2,510 $7,026 Middle School $238.22 64.71%0.0691 0.2523 $0 $0 High School $238.22 130 64.71%0.0987 0.2523 $1,978 $5,056 Total $4,488 $12,082 Tax Payment Credit Calculation SFR MFR Average Assessed Value (April 2019)$383,189 $156,304 Capital Bond Interest Rate (April 2020)2.44%2.44% Net Present Value of Average Dwelling $3,364,116 $1,372,234 Years Amortized 10 10 Property Tax Levy Rate $1.86 $1.86 Present Value of Revenue Stream $6,257 $2,552 Single FamilyMulti-Family Mixed-Use Residences Residences Residential 1 Mitigation Fee Summary Site Acquisition Cost 1,193$ 3,340$ 3,340$ Permanent Facility Cost 16,037$ 43,299$ 43,299$ Temporary Facility Cost -$ -$ -$ State Match Credit (4,488)$ (12,082)$ (12,082)$ Tax Payment Credit (6,257)$ (2,552)$ (2,552)$ Sub-Total 6,485$ 32,005$ 32,005$ 50% Local Share 3,243$ 16,003$ 16,003$ Calculated Impact Fee 3,243$ 16,003$ 8,001$ City of Kent Impact Fee2 3,243$ 9,193$ 1In accordance with the City of Federal Way Ordinance No. 95-249 2In accordance with the City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev 1/20 FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 29 REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS SCHOOL ACQUISITION COST The district purchased the former Devry Technical School building to house displaced scholars during school construction then will provide permanent capacity for Early Childhood Education programs. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION COST With voter approval of the $450,000,000 bond package, design work is underway for six of the approved projects. Anticipated construction budgets (based on the Guaranteed Maximum Price or GMP) have been updated to reflect the final construction contracts. In addition, a credit for the cost of new construction is incorporated to recognize the K-3 Class Size Reduction Grant obtained by Federal Way Public Schools. The following table outlines the facility cost included in the impact fee calculation: Elementary Schools Lake Grove Mirror Lake Star Lake Wildwood Elementary TOTAL Permanent Capacity 353 404 387 472 1616 New Capacity 600 600 525 600 2325 Increased Capacity as % 43.9% GMP $28,874,876 $29,833,964 $29,091,582 $28,635,988 $116,436,410 Proportionate Share $ 51,085,034 K-3 Class Size Credit ($ 11,598,151) Net Proportionate Share $ 39,486,883 Two additional projects are within this horizon, but not yet included – Olympic View K-8 and Mark Twain Elementary. These costs will be incorporated into future Capital Facilities Plans. Current Middle School capacity calculations do not reflect unhoused students, so no costs associated with Illahee Middle School or Totem Middle School are included. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 30 Consistent with the capacity calculations described earlier, the District uses the OSPI square footage calculation for determining capacity at our secondary schools. Based on this methodology, the following construction costs for Thomas Jefferson High School are allocated as the proportionate share: REFERENCES TO IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS, continued Square Footage Capacity at 130 sq. ft. Current: 179,119 1378 Planned: 210,000 1615 Increased Capacity 237 Increase as % 17.24% GMP $94,176,828 Proportionate Share $ 16,236,550 The District will use the above formulas created as a base for future Capital Facilities Plans during the life of the current bond authorization. The capacity of these schools may vary from year to year as programs are added or changed and construction cost may increase over time. FACILITIES CAPACITY Permanent Facility Capacity: Changes to the Building Program Capacities calculation are found on page 15. Capacity Summaries: The changes in the Capacity Summary are a reflection of the changes in the capacities and student forecast. New schools and increased capacity at current buildings are shown as increases to capacity. Capacity Summaries are found on pages 22-26. Student Generation Factor Analysis: Federal Way Public Schools student generation factor was determined separately for single-family units and multi-family units. The factors used in the 2021 Capital Facilities Plan were derived using actual generation factors from single-family units and multi-family units that were constructed in the District in the last five (5) years and can be found on the next page Temporary Facility Cost: The list of portables reflects the movement of portables between facilities or new portables purchased. Portable Locations can be found on pages 16 and 17. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 31 STUDENT GENERATION RATES New Construction in Prior 5 Years Single Family Student Generation Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Single Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor18-Retreat Meadows 56 4 2 5 0.0714 0.0357 0.0893 0.196418-Wyncrest II 41 5 1 4 0.1220 0.0244 0.0976 0.244018-Soundview Manor 21 2 1 1 0.0952 0.0476 0.0476 0.190417-Eagle Manor 12 4 1 1 0.3333 0.0833 0.0833 0.499917-Lakehaven Estates 13 0 1 1 0.0000 0.0769 0.0769 0.153817-Hibbford Glen 15 7 4 4 0.4667 0.2667 0.2667 1.000117-Vista Pointe 105 24 8 10 0.2286 0.0762 0.0952 0.400016-Jefferson Place 11 6 2 1 0.5455 0.1818 0.0909 0.818216-Star Lake East 30 3 1 3 0.1000 0.0333 0.1000 0.2333 Total 304 55 21 30 Student Generation*0.1809 0.0691 0.0987 0.3487 Multi-Family Student Generation - City of Federal Way Number of Number of Number of Number of Elementary Middle School High School Total Multi Family Elementary Middle School High School Student Student Student Student DEVELOPMENT Dwellings Students Students Students Factor Factor Factor Factor(17) Uptown Square 308 114 71 75 0.3701 0.2305 0.2435 0.8441(17) Kitt's Corner 216 161 58 58 0.7454 0.2685 0.2685 1.2824(16) Kandila Townhomes 27 4 10 6 0.1481 0.3704 0.2222 0.7407 Total 551 279 139 139 Student Generation*0.5064 0.2523 0.2523 1.0109 * Student Generation rate is based on totals. FEDERAL WAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2021 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 32 IMPACT FEE CALCULATION CHANGES FROM 2020 TO 2021 Item From/To Comment Percent of Permanent Facilities 95.10% to 96.11%Report #3 OSPI Percent Temporary Facilities 4.90% to 3.89%Updated portable inventory Average Cost of Portable $189,941 to $169,579 Updated 5-yr rolling average of Classrooms portables purchased and placed by 2016. Construction Cost Allocation $225.97 to $238.22 Change effective July 2020 State Match 65.59% to 64.71%Change effective July 2020 Average Assessed Value Per Puget Sound Educational SFR- $367,890 to $383,189 Service District (ESD 121) MFR- $133,215 to $156,304 Capital Bond Interest Rate 4.09% to 2.44%Market Rate Property Tax Levy Rate $1.86 to $1.86 King County Treasury Division Student Generation Factors Updated Housing Inventory Single-Family Elementary .1793 to .1809 Middle School .0897 to .0691 High School .1386 to .0987 Multi-Family Elementary .5853 to .5064 Middle School .2938 to .2523 High School .3116 to .2523 Impact Fee SFR- $5,035 to $3,243 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR -$20,768 to $16,003 MFR based on the updated calculation City of Kent SFR- $5,035 to $3,243 SFR based on the updated calculation MFR -$8,386 to $9,193 MFR maximum per City of Kent Ordinance No. 4278, rev 1/20 Note: Student generation factors for our single family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. Student generation factors for are multi- family units are based on new developments constructed within the District over the last five (5) years prior to the date of the fee calculation. This document is published by the Business Services Department of the Federal Way Public Schools. May 2020 In an environment of high expectations, high support, and no excuses, the staff of Federal Way Public Schools will continually learn, lead, utilize data, and collaborate to ensure our scholars have a voice, a dream, and a bright future. -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 16 Exhibit E.3 Kent School District Capital Facility Plan Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan 2020-21 through 2025-2026 June 2020 Kent School District No. 415 12033 SE 256th Street Kent, Washington 98030-6643 (253) 373-7295 BOARD of DIRECTORS Ms. Leslie Hamada, President Ms. Denise Daniels, Vice President Ms. Maya Vengadasalam, Legislative Representative Ms. Michele Bettinger, Director Ms. Leah Bowen, Director ADMINISTRATION Dr. Calvin J. Watts Superintendent of Schools Israel Vela, Chief School Operations and Academic Support Officer Dr. Jewelle Harmon, Chief Accountability Officer Mr. Benjamin Rarick, Executive Director of Fiscal Services Mr. Dave Bussard, Director of Capital Planning & Facilities Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 2 of 15 Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table of Contents I - Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 3 II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection ................................................................................... 4 III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" .................................................... 6 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students ................................................... 7 Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students ........................................ 7 IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools ................................................................ 8 V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan ..................................................................... 9 VI - Portable Classrooms .................................................................................................. 10 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity ................................................................... 11 VIII - Finance Plan ............................................................................................................. 12 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan ....................................... 14 X - Appendices .................................................................................................................. 15 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 3 of 15 I - Executive Summary This Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan has been prepared by the Kent School District as the organization's capital facilities planning document, in compliance with the requirements of Washington's Growth Management Act, King County Code K.C.C. 21A.43 and Cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, Auburn, Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac. This annual Plan update was prepared using data available in the spring of 2020 for the 2020-2021 school year. This annual update of the Plan reflects no new major capital projects, and an inflation-based adjustment to prior year impact fee rates. This Plan is consistent with prior long-term capital facilities plans adopted by the Kent School District. This Plan is not intended to be the sole planning document for all of the District's needs. The District may prepare interim and periodic Long-Range Capital Facilities Plans consistent with Board Policies, taking into account a longer or shorter time period, other factors and trends in the use of facilities, and other needs of the District as may be required. Prior Capital Facilities Plans of the Kent School District have been adopted by Metropolitan King County Council and Cities of Kent, Covington, Auburn and Renton and included in the Capital Facilities Plan element of the Comprehensive Plans of each jurisdiction. This Plan has also been submitted to cities of Black Diamond, Maple Valley, and SeaTac for their information and inclusion in their Comprehensive Plans. In order for impact fees to be collected in the unincorporated areas of Kent School District, the Metropolitan King County Council must adopt this Plan and a fee- implementing ordinance for the District. For impact fees to be collected in the incorporated portions of the District, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton and Auburn must also adopt this Plan and their own school impact fee ordinances. This Capital Facilities Plan establishes a standard of service in order to ascertain current and future capacity. While the State Superintendent of Public Instruction establishes square footage guidelines for capacity, those guidelines do not account for local program needs in the District. The Growth Management Act, King County and City codes and ordinances authorize the District to make adjustments to the standard of service based on specific needs for students of the District. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. Program capacity is based on an average capacity and updated to reflect changes to special programs served in each building. Portables in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The capacity of each school in the District is calculated based on the District’s standard of service and the existing inventory of permanent facilities. The District's program capacity Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 4 of 15 of permanent facilities reflects program changes and the state’s mandated reduction of class size to meet the standard of service for Kent School District. Portables provide additional transitional capacity. Kent School District is the fifth largest (FTE basis) district in the state. Enrollment is electronically reported monthly to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (“OSPI”) on Form P-223. Although funding apportionment is based on Annual Average Full Time Equivalent (AAFTE), enrollment on October 1 is a widely recognized “snapshot in time” that is used to report the District’s enrollment for the year as reported to OSPI. The District's standard of service, enrollment history and projections, and use of transitional facilities are reviewed in detail in various sections of this Plan. The District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables. This Plan currently represents projects in process funded primarily by the Kent School District’s 2016 Bond. Additional information about these projects can be found at the district’s capital projects homepage (link). Additionally, project updates sent to our community of stakeholders can be accessed on the KSD website (link). II - Six - Year Enrollment Projection For capital facilities planning, enrollment growth projections are based on cohort survival and student yield from documented residential construction projected over the next six years (See Table 2). King County live births and the District's relational percentage average were used to determine the number of kindergartners entering the system (See Table 1). 7.75% of 25,800 King County live births in 2015 is projected for 1,976 students expected in Kindergarten for October 1, 2020. This is an increase of 139 live births in King County over the previous year (See Table 2). Early Childhood Education students (also identified as “ECE”), “Early Childhood Special Education (“ECSE”) students are forecast and reported to OSPI separately on Form P-223H for Special Education Enrollment. Capacity is reserved to serve students in the ECE programs at elementary schools. The first-grade population of Kent School District is traditionally 1-3% larger than the kindergarten population due to growth and transfers to the District. Cohort survival method uses historical enrollment data to forecast the number of students projected for the following year. Projections for October 1, 2020-2025 are from OSPI Report 1049 – Determination of Projected Enrollments. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 5 of 15 Within practical limits, the District has kept abreast of proposed developments. The District will continue to track new development activity to determine impact to schools. Information on new residential developments and the completion of these proposed developments in all jurisdictions will be considered in the District's future analysis of growth projections. The Kent School District serves eight permitting jurisdictions: unincorporated King County, the cities of Kent, Covington, Renton, and Auburn and smaller portions of the cities of SeaTac, Black Diamond, and Maple Valley. STUDENT GENERATION FACTOR "Student Factor" is defined by King County code as "the number derived by a school district to describe how many students of each grade span are expected to be generated by a dwelling unit" based on district records of average actual student generated rates for developments completed within the last ten years. Following these guidelines, the student generation rate for Kent School District is as follows: Single Family Elementary .334 Middle School .078 Senior High .117 Total .529 Multi-Family Elementary .117 Middle School .028 Senior High .048 Total .193 The student generation factor is based on a survey of 2,767 single-family dwelling units and 1,831 multi-family dwelling units with no adjustment for occupancy rates. In preparing the 2020-2021 to 2025-2026 Capital Facilities Plan the District contracted with Davis Demographics and Planning (DDP) of Riverside California, a noted expert in demographic studies for school districts, to analyze and prepare the student generation factor. DDP used a larger sample of single-family residences than the district did in previous plans and included both “garden” and “urban style” apartments in the calculation for multi-family residences. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 OCTOBER REPORT 1251H (HEADCOUNT) ENROLLMENT HISTORY LB = Live Births LB in 2005 LB in 2006 LB in 2007 LB in 2008 LB in 2009 LB in 2010 LB in 2011 LB in 2012 LB in 2013 LB in 2014 October HC Enrollment 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 King County Live Births 1 22,680 24,244 24,899 25,222 25,057 24,514 24,630 25,032 24,910 25,348 Increase / Decrease -194 1,564 655 323 -165 -543 116 402 280 316Kindergarten / Birth % 1 8.13%8.18%8.57%8.40%8.34%8.34%8.17%8.14%7.98%7.93% Kindergarten 1845 1983 2134 2119 2090 2045 2013 2037 1989 2010Grade 1 1996 1888 2017 2186 2127 2131 2067 2056 2061 2036Grade 2 1942 2016 1905 2055 2190 2163 2163 2077 2008 2091Grade 3 2002 1983 2082 1922 2070 2176 2195 2143 2043 1995Grade 4 1956 2024 2000 2087 1956 2089 2195 2218 2118 2038Grade 5 2086 1974 2044 2008 2116 1958 2103 2189 2169 2120Grade 6 2135 2135 2026 2079 2023 2058 1952 2120 2184 2164Grade 7 Middle School 2095 2105 2139 2046 2104 1974 2021 1922 2044 2166Grade 8 " "2153 2111 2139 2121 2091 2100 2021 2043 1882 2073Grade 9 Senior High 2440 2471 2455 2483 2428 2093 2105 2006 2004 1888Grade 10 " "2238 2272 2092 2046 2151 2165 2099 2080 1946 2035Grade 11 " "2048 1995 1933 1873 1802 1818 1865 1823 1732 1663Grade 12 " "1694 1658 1646 1539 1576 1742 1730 1810 1654 1634 Total Enrollment 2 26,630 26,615 26,612 26,564 26,724 26,512 26,529 26,524 25,834 25,913 Yearly Headcount Increase / Decrease -134 -15 -3 -48 160 -212 17 -5 -690 79 Cumulative Increase -201 -216 -219 -267 -107 -319 -302 -307 -997 -918 1 This number indicates actual births in King County 5 years prior to enrollment year as updated by Washington State Department of Health, Center for Health Statistics. Kent School District percentage based on actual Kindergarten enrollment 5 years later.2 Enrollment reported to OSPI on Form P-223 generates basic education funding and excludes Early Childhood Special Education ("ECSE" & "B2" or Birth to 2 Preschool Inclusive Education) and excludes College-only Running Start students. For 2020 CFP - Headcount Enrollment History Change to Full Day Kindergarten for all schools Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 1 June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX - YEAR ENROLLMENT PROJECTION Full Day Kindergarten at all Elem LB in 2014 LB in 2015 LB in 2016 LB in 2017 LB in 2018 LB in 2019 Est LB in 2020 ACTUAL ENROLLMENT October 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 King County Live Births 25,348 25,487 26,011 26,011 26,011 26,011 26,011 Increase / Decrease 438 139 524 0 0 0 0 Kindergarten / Birth % 7.93%7.75%7.54%7.48%7.42%7.36%7.30% FD Kindergarten 2,010 1,976 1,961 1,945 1,929 1,914 1,898Grade 1 2,036 2,045 2,010 1,995 1,978 1,962 1,947Grade 2 2,091 2,047 2,056 2,021 2,006 1,989 1,973Grade 3 1,995 2,081 2,037 2,046 2,011 1,996 1,979Grade 4 2,038 2,000 2,087 2,042 2,052 2,016 2,001Grade 5 2,120 2,031 1,993 2,080 2,035 2,045 2,009Grade 6 2,164 2,109 2,020 1,982 2,069 2,024 2,034Grade 7 2,166 2,120 2,066 1,979 1,942 2,027 1,983Grade 8 2,073 2,177 2,131 2,077 1,989 1,952 2,038Grade 9 1,888 2,064 2,168 2,122 2,068 1,981 1,944Grade 10 2,035 1,838 2,009 2,111 2,066 2,013 1,929Grade 11 1,663 1,735 1,567 1,712 1,799 1,761 1,716Grade 12 1,634 1,577 1,645 1,486 1,623 1,706 1,670 Total Enrollment Projection 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 25,121 Yearly Increase/Decrease 79 -113 -50 -152 -31 -181 -265 Yearly Increase/Decrease %0.31%-0.44%-0.19%-0.59%-0.12%-0.71%-1.04% Total Enrollment Projection 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 25,121 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT 2019- 2025 Projections from OSPI Report 1049 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 2 June 2020 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 6 of 15 Urban style apartments typically have four stories, a central lobby and entrance, elevator access to all floors and have a central corridor with apartments on each side. These apartments have little or no surface street parking, with parking located beneath the building; retail may or may not be included with the building. If there is retail, it will generally be located on the first floor. These apartments seldom have swimming pools and do not have playgrounds for children. Garden style apartments will have very little studio apartments and will have more three- bedroom apartments then the urban style and in theory generate more students enrolled in school. These apartments will also have lawns, club houses, swimming pools and places for children to play. The District felt that it is important to include both styles of apartments for the student generation factor. Though it is anticipated that few students will come from the urban style, they are now part of the mix in Kent and thus should be included in mix of multi- family housing units. Within the district’s borders there are several low-income and multi-family housing projects coming on-line during 2020-2021. Once developed with occupancy occurring the District does recognize that the student generation for multi-family housing may impact future Capital Facilities Plan updates. III - Current Kent School District “Standard of Service" In order to determine the capacity of facilities in a school district, King County Code 21A.06 references a "standard of service" that each school district must establish in order to ascertain its overall capacity. The standard of service identifies the program year, the class size, the number of classrooms, students and programs of special need, and other factors determined by the district which would best serve the student population. This Plan includes the standard of service as established by Kent School District. The District has identified schools with significant special needs programs as “impact” schools and the standard of service targets a lower-class size at those facilities. Portables included in the capacity calculation use the same standard of service as the permanent facilities. The standard of service defined herein will continue to evolve in the future. Kent School District is continuing a long-term strategic planning process combined with review of changes to capacity and standard of service. This process will affect various aspects of the District's standard of service and future changes will be reflected in future capital facilities plans. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 7 of 15 Current Standards of Service for Elementary Students • Class size ratio for grades K - 3 is planned for an average of 23 students per class, not to exceed 26. • Class size ratio for grades 4 - 6 is planned for an average of 27 students per class, not to exceed 29. Some special programs require specialized classroom space and the program capacity of some of the buildings housing these programs is reduced. Some students, for example, leave their regular classroom for a short period of time to receive instruction in special programs and space must be allocated to serve these programs. Students may also be provided music instruction and physical education in a separate classroom or facility. Some identified students will also be provided educational opportunities in classrooms for special programs such as those designated as follows: English Learners (EL) Education for Disadvantaged Students (Title I) – Federal Program Learning Assisted Programs (LAP) – State Program Highly Capable Students – State Program Reading, math or science Labs Dual Language Programs in four elementary schools Inclusive Education Service for Elementary and Secondary students with disabilities may be provided in a separate or self-contained classroom sometimes with a capacity of 10- 15 depending on the program. Current District Standards of Service for Secondary Students The standards of service outlined below reflect only those programs and educational opportunities provided to secondary students which directly affect the capacity of the school buildings per the negotiated collective bargaining agreement with KEA. • The average class size ratio for grades 7–8 is 30 students per class and 143 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 150 based on five class periods per day. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 INVENTORY and CAPACITY of EXISTING SCHOOLS 2019-2020 SCHOOL YearOpened ABR ADDRESS Program Capacity Carriage Crest Elementary 1990 CC 18235 - 140th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 428 Cedar Valley Elementary 1971 CV 26500 Timberlane Way SE, Covington 98042 360 Covington Elementary 2018 CO 25811 156th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 630 Crestwood Elementary 1980 CW 25225 - 180th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 408 East Hill Elementary 1953 EH 9825 S 240th Street, Kent 98031 464 Emerald Park 1999 EP 11800 SE 216th Street, Kent 98031 477 Fairwood Elementary 1969 FW 16600 - 148th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 386 George T. Daniel Elementary 1992 DE 11310 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 432 Glenridge Elementary 1996 GR 19405 - 120th Avenue SE, Renton 98058 431 Grass Lake Elementary 1971 GL 28700 - 191st Place SE, Kent 98042 428 Horizon Elementary 1990 HE 27641 - 144th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Jenkins Creek Elementary 1987 JC 26915 - 186th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 384 Kent Elementary 1999 KE 24700 - 64th Avenue South, Kent 98032 454 Kent Valley Early Learning Center 2014 KV 317 ---4th Ave S, Kent, WA 98032 318 Lake Youngs Elementary 1965 LY 19660 - 142nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Martin Sortun Elementary 1987 MS 12711 SE 248th Street, Kent 98030 455 Meadow Ridge Elementary 1994 MR 27710 - 108th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 454 Meridian Elementary 1939 ME 25621 - 140th Avenue SE, Kent 98042 497 Millennium Elementary 2000 ML 11919 SE 270th Street, Kent 98030 478 Neely-O'Brien Elementary 1990 NO 6300 South 236th Street, Kent 98032 454 Panther Lake Elementary 2009 PL 12022 SE 216th Street, Kent, 98031 552 Park Orchard Elementary 1963 PO 11010 SE 232nd Street, Kent 98031 463 Pine Tree Elementary 1967 PT 27825 - 118th Avenue SE, Kent 98030 487 Ridgewood Elementary 1987 RW 18030 - 162nd Place SE, Renton 98058 477 Sawyer Woods Elementary 1994 SW 31135 - 228th Ave SE, Black Diamond 98010 477 Scenic Hill Elementary 1960 SH 26025 Woodland Way South, Kent 98030 454 Soos Creek Elementary 1971 SC 12651 SE 218th Place, Kent 98031 360 Springbrook Elementary 1969 SB 20035 - 100th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 396 Sunrise Elementary 1992 SR 22300 - 132nd Avenue SE, Kent 98042 477 Elementary TOTAL 13,055 Cedar Heights Middle School 1993 CH 19640 SE 272 Street, Covington 98042 895 Mattson Middle School 1981 MA 16400 SE 251st Street, Covington 98042 787 Meeker Middle School 1970 MK 12600 SE 192nd Street, Renton 98058 832 Meridian Middle School 1958 MM 23480 - 120th Avenue SE, Kent 98031 792 Mill Creek Middle School 2005 MC 620 North Central Avenue, Kent 98032 916 Northwood Middle School 1996 NW 17007 SE 184th Street, Renton 98058 926 Middle School TOTAL 5,148 Kent-Meridian High School 1951 KM 10020 SE 256th Street, Kent 98030 1,904 Kentlake Senior High School 1997 KL 21401 SE 300th Street, Kent 98042 1,957 Kentridge Senior High School 1968 KR 12430 SE 208th Street, Kent 98031 2,277 Kentwood Senior High School 1981 KW 25800 - 164th Avenue SE, Covington 98042 2,159 Senior High TOTAL 8,297 Kent Mountain View Academy 1997 MV/LC 22420 Military Road, Des Moines 98198 396 Kent Phoenix Academy 2007 PH 11000 SE 264th Street, Kent 98030 414 DISTRICT TOTAL 27,310 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 3 June 2020 Kent School D istrict So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , DeLo r me, U SGS , Inte r m ap , INC R EM ENT P,NR C a n, Esr i Japa n, M ET I, Esr i C h in a (Ho ng Kong ), Esr i Kor ea, Esr i(T ha i lan d ), M ap m yIn dia, N GC C , © O penStr eetM ap c ontrib u to r s,and th e GIS U se r C om m unity May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davi s D e m o gr aphic s & Plan ni ngMap by: Sc hoolSite L oca to r Kent School D istrict So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , DeLo r me, U SGS , Inte r m ap , INC R EM ENT P,NR C a n, Esr i Japa n, M ET I, Esr i C h in a (Ho ng Kong ), Esr i Kor ea, Esr i(T ha i lan d ), M ap m yIn dia, N GC C , © O penStr eetM ap c ontrib u to r s,and th e GIS U se r C om m unity May 22, 2017 0 3.5 71.75 mi 0 5.5 112.75 km 1:144,448 Davi s D e m o gr aphic s & Plan ni ngMap by: Sc hoolSite L oca to r Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 8 of 15 • The average class size ratio for grades 9-12 is 32 students per class and 153 students per day, with a maximum daily class load/enrollment of 160 based on five class periods per day. Similar to Inclusive Education Programs listed above, many other secondary programs require specialized classroom space which can reduce the program capacity of the permanent school buildings, such as technology labs, performing arts activities, a variety of career and technical education programs, and other specialized programs. Space or Classroom Utilization As a result of scheduling conflicts for student programs, the need for specialized rooms for certain programs, and the need for teachers to have a workspace during their planning periods, it is not possible to achieve 100% utilization of regular teaching stations at secondary schools. Based on the analysis of actual utilization of classrooms, the District has determined that the standard utilization rate is 85% for secondary schools. Program capacity at elementary schools reflects 100% utilization at the elementary level. IV - Inventory and Capacity of Existing Schools Currently, the District has permanent program capacity to house 27,310 students and transitional (portable) capacity to house 2,085. This capacity is based on the District's Standard of Service as set forth in Section III. Included in this Plan is an inventory of the District's schools by type, address and current capacity (See Table 3). The ratio between permanent capacity and portable capacity is 94.9%-5.1%. The program capacity is periodically updated for changes in programs, additional classrooms and new schools. Program capacity has been updated in this Plan to reflect program changes implemented in the Fall of 2019. Calculation of Elementary, Middle School and Senior High School capacities are set forth in Appendices A, B, and C. Maps of existing schools are included. For clarification, the following is a brief description of some of the non-traditional programs for students in Kent School District: Both the Kent Mountain View Academy and the Kent Phoenix Academy are now sharing the building that formerly served Sequoia Middle School beginning the school year 2019- 2020. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 9 of 15 iGrad - Kent School District has developed the Individualized Graduation and Degree Program or “iGrad”. iGrad offers a second chance to students age 16-21 who have dropped out of high school and want to earn a high school diploma. iGrad is not included in this Capital Facilities Plan because it is served in leased space at the Kent Hill Plaza Shopping Center. Over the past three years, enrollment in the iGrad program has averaged over 300 students. V - Six-Year Planning and Construction Plan In November 2016, the voters of the Kent School District approved a bond measure for $252 million. This new bonding authority provided for the replacement for Covington Elementary school, which opened in August of 2018, a new elementary school in the Kent Valley (Currently being built at the former location of Kent Mountain View Academy), and the twenty additional classrooms project redirected by the Kent School Board to build a 20 classroom Kent Academy Facility housing multiple academy programs in our district, which is currently underway at the site of the Old Panther Lake Elementary School. At the time of preparation of this Plan in spring 2020, the following projects to increase capacity are either in the planning phase or will start in spring 2020. • Construction is in progress for New Valley Elementary School (project name only) on West Hill within the City Limits of SeaTac, WA. The 89,000 square foot K-6 school project is being funded with bond funds and impact fees from King County. • Construction is in progress to add New Academy Facility at the Old Panther Lake Elementary Site in Kent in order to free up space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy location (formerly Sequoyah Middle School) for additional classroom space if needed and/or to open another middle school in the near future. The new 59,000 square foot facility will accommodate a variety of Academy Programs within the Kent School District. • Some funding for lease or purchase of additional portables may be provided by impact fees as needed. Sites are based on need for additional capacity. As a critical component of capital facilities planning, county and city planners and decision-makers are encouraged to consider safe walking conditions for all students when reviewing applications and design plans for new roads and developments. This should include sidewalks for pedestrian safety to and from school and bus stops as well as bus pull-outs and turn-arounds. Included in this Plan is an inventory of potential projects and sites identified by the District which are potentially acceptable site alternatives in the future (See Table 4 & Site map). KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions and Projects Planned to Provide Additional Capacity Projected Projected % forSCHOOL / FACILITY / SITE LOCATION Type Status Completion Program newDateCapacityGrowth Approximate Approximate# onMap ELEMENTARY 6 New Valley Elementary School Old Kent Mountain View Academy Site ElementaryAddition Under Construction 2021-2022 700 100% MIDDLE SCHOOL & SENIOR HIGH 3 New Academy Site Old Panther Lake Elementary Site Academy Under Construction 2021-2022 480 100% TEMPORARY FACILITIES AdditionalCapacity Portables 1 TBD - For placement as needed New Planning 2020+24 - 31 each 100% # onMap 2 OTHER SITES ACQUIRED Land UseDesignation Type 1 164th SE (Across from Mattson)25230-25050 164th SE, Covington 98042 Rural TBD 2 Ham Lake area (Pollard)16820 SE 240, Kent 98042 Rural Elementary 4 Shady Lk area (Sowers, Blaine, Drahota, Paroline)17426 SE 192 Street, Renton 98058 Urban Elementary 5 SE of Lake Morton area (West property)SE 332 & 204 SE, Kent 98042 Rural Secondary 10 South Central Site (Yeh)SE 286th St & 124th Ave SE, Auburn 98092 Urban TBD 12 256th - Covington (Halleson)25435 SE 256th, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold 12a 156th - Covington (Wikstrom)25847 156th Ave. SE, Covington 98042 Rural To be sold Notes: 1 TBD - To be determined - Some sites are identified but placement, timing and/or configuration of portables has not been determined. 2 Numbers correspond to sites on Site Bank Map on Page 19. Other Map site locations are parcels identified in Table 7 on Page 29. King County King County Land UseJurisdiction King County King County King County King County King County Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 4 June 2020 copyright KROLL MAP COMPANY, INC. This map has been modified by KSD 08/01 Fairwood Elementary Ridgewood Elementary Northwood Middle School Lake Youngs Elementary Glenridge Elementary Kentridge High School Panther Lake Elementary Springbrook Elementary Soos Creek Elementary Sunrise Elementary Meridian Middle School Park Orchard Elementary Martin Sortun Elementary Daniel Elementary East Hill Elementary Kent Elementary Kent-Meridian High School Scenic Hill Elementary Kent School District Administration Center Meadow Ridge Elementary Pine Tree Elementary Horizon Elementary Covington Elementary Cedar Heights Middle School Cedar Valley ElementaryJenkins Creek Elementary Kentwood High School Crestwood Elementary Mattson Middle School Sawyer Woods Elementary Kentlake High School Kent Mountain View Academy Neely O’Brien Elementary Carriage Crest Elementary Meridian Elementary Meeker Middle School Grass Lake Elementary Emerald Park Elementary Kent Phoenix Academy Millennium Elementary Mill Creek Middle School Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 10 of 15 Voter approved bond issues have included funding for the purchase of sites for some of these and future schools, and the sites acquired to date are included in this Plan. Some funding is secured for purchase of additional sites, but some may be funded with impact fees as needed. Not all undeveloped properties meet current school construction requirements and some property may be traded or sold to meet future facility needs. The Board of Directors has started the process to sell surplus property in the spring of 2020. The Board will continue an annual review of standards of service and those decisions will be reflected in each update of the Capital Facilities Plan. VI - Portable Classrooms The Plan references use of portables as interim or transitional capacity and facilities. Currently, the District utilizes portables to house students in excess of permanent capacity and for program purposes at some school locations (Please see Appendices A, B, C). Based on enrollment projections, implementation of full day kindergarten programs, lower state mandated class sizes, program capacity, and the need for additional permanent capacity, the District anticipates the need to purchase or lease additional portables during the next six-year period. During the time period covered by this Plan, the District does not anticipate that all of the District’s portables will be replaced by permanent facilities. During the useful life of some of the portables, the school-age population may decline in some communities and increase in others, and these portables provide the flexibility to accommodate the immediate needs of the community. Portables may be used as interim or transitional facilities: 1. To prevent overbuilding or overcrowding of permanent school facilities. 2. To cover the gap between the times of demand for increased capacity and completion of permanent school facilities to meet that demand. 3. To meet unique program requirements. Portables currently in the District’s inventory are continually evaluated resulting in some being improved and some replaced. The Plan projects that the District will use portables to accommodate interim housing needs for the next six years and beyond. The use of portables, their impacts on permanent facilities, life cycle and operational costs, and the interrelationship between portables, emerging technologies, and educational restructuring will continue to be examined. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY TOTAL DISTRICT SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Actual Permanent Program Capacity 1 27,255 27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435 Changes to Permanent Capacity 1 Capacity Increase (F) New Elementary School2 700 New Academy (Old PL Site)480 Additional Permanent Classrooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent Program Capacity Subtotal 27,255 27,255 28,435 28,435 28,435 28,435 Interim Portable Capacity 3 Elementary Portable Capacity Required 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 336 Middle School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Senior High School Portable Capacity Required 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,440 1,248 456 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 28,695 28,503 28,891 28,771 28,771 28,771 TOTAL ENROLLMENT/ PROJECTION 4 25,913 25,800 25,750 25,598 25,567 25,386 DISTRICT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 5 2,782 2,703 3,141 3,173 3,204 3,385 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.2 New Elementary school will increase capacity and will be built on the existing site of Kent Mountain View Academy.3 2019-2020 total classroom portable capacity is 1440. Some additional relocatable used for program purposes.4 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.5 School capacity meets concurrency requirements and no impact fees are proposed for secondary schools. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY ELEMENTARY - Grades K - 6 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25Actual Elementary Permanent Capacity 1 13,000 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700 New Elementary School - Kent Valley 700 Additional Permanent Classrooms 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Subtotal 13,000 13,000 13,700 13,700 13,700 13,700 Portable Capacity Required 1 1440 1248 456 336 336 336 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 / 2 14,440 14,248 14,156 14,036 14,036 14,036 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 14,454 14,289 14,164 14,111 14,080 13,946 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY -14 -41 -8 -75 -44 90 Number of Portables Required 60 52 19 14 14 14 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes 2 Additional classrooms will be placed at schools with the greatest need for aleve overcrowding 3 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollment Enrollment & Projections reflect FULL Day Kindergarten at ALL Elementary schools @ 1.0 & exclude ECSE Prescho P R O J E C T E Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 A June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY MIDDLE SCHOOL - Grades 7 - 8 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 2025-2026 Middle School Permanent Capacity 1 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 No Changes to Middle School Capacity Subtotal 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 Portable Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 & 3 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 5,148 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 2 4,239 4,297 4,197 4,056 3,931 3,979 4,021 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 909 851 951 1,092 1,217 1,169 1,127 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at middle schools at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes.2 Actual October Headcount Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments.3 Surplus capacity due to grade level reconfiguration - All 9th grade students moved to the high schools in Fall 2004. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 B June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT and CAPACITY SENIOR HIGH - Grades 9 - 12 SCHOOL YEAR 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-2025 2025-2026 Senior High Permanent Capacity 1 8,297 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 New Academy (Old PL site)480 No Changes to High School Capacity Subtotal 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 Portables Capacity Required 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL CAPACITY 1 8,297 8,297 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 8,777 ENROLLMENT / PROJECTION 3 7,220 7,214 7,389 7,431 7,556 7,461 7,259 SURPLUS (DEFICIT) CAPACITY 1,077 1,083 1,388 1,346 1,221 1,316 1,518 Number of Portables Required 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 No Classroom Portables required at this time. Some Portables used for classroom and program purposes. 1 Capacity is based on standard of service for programs provided and is updated periodically to reflect program changes. 3 Actual October Enrollment with Projections from OSPI Report 1049 - Determination of Projected Enrollments. P R O J E C T E D Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 5 C June 2020 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 11 of 15 VII - Projected Six-Year Classroom Capacity As stated in Section IV, the program capacity study is periodically updated for changes in special programs and reflects class size requirements, class size fluctuations etc. As shown in the Inventory and Capacity chart in Table 3, the program capacity is also reflected in the capacity and enrollment comparison charts (See Tables 5 & 5 a-b-c). Enrollment is electronically reported to OSPI on Form P-223 on a monthly basis and funding apportionment is based on Annual Average FTE (AAFTE). The first school day of October is widely recognized as the enrollment “snapshot in time” to report enrollment for the year. Kent School District continues to be the fifth largest district (both FTE and headcount basis) in the state of Washington. The P-223 Headcount for October 2019 was 25,833 with kindergarten students counted at 1.0 and excluding ECSE and college-only Running Start students. A full headcount of all students enrolled in October 2019 totals 26,749 which included ECSE and college-only Running Start students. In October 2019, there were 1,177 students in 11th and 12th grade participating in the Running Start program at different colleges and receiving credits toward both high school and college graduation. Of these students, 664 attended classes only at the college (“college-only”) and are excluded from FTE and headcount for capacity and enrollment comparisons. Kent School District has one of the highest Running Start program participation rates in the state. Based on the enrollment forecasts, permanent facility inventory and capacity, current standard of service, portable capacity, and future additional classroom space, the District plans to continue to satisfy concurrency requirements through the transitional use of portables (See Table 5 and Tables 5 a-b-c). This does not mean that some schools will not experience overcrowding. There may be a need for additional portables and/or new schools to accommodate growth within the District. New schools may be designed to accommodate placement of future portables. School attendance area changes, limited and costly movement of portables, zoning changes, market conditions, and educational restructuring will all play a major role in addressing overcrowding and underutilization of facilities in different parts of the District. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 12 of 15 VIII - Finance Plan The finance plan shown on Table 6 demonstrates how the Kent School District plans to finance improvements for the years 2020-2021 through 2025-2026. The financing components include secured and unsecured funding and impact fees. The plan is based on future bond issues, state school construction assistance, collection of impact fees under the State Growth Management Act and voluntary mitigation fees paid pursuant to State Environmental Policy Act. The plan also includes an additional elementary school in the Kent Valley which is currently under construction at the current site of the Kent Mountain View Academy on Military Road in SeaTac. Kent Mountain View Academy moved into and is sharing space at the current Kent Phoenix Academy (located at the former Sequoyah Middle School) starting the 2019-2020 school year. This new school will increase the capacity at the elementary level by 700 students. Some impact fees are scheduled to be part of the overall finance plan. In November 2016, the District held a special election to approve the authorization of $252,000,000 in bonding authority. The projects described above are part of this authorization. The first series of bonds ($80 million) were issued in February 2017, which funded the Covington Elementary Replacement School, as well as other infrastructure projects. Impact fees will be used at both projects due to escalation in construction pricing across the pacific northwest. The Finance Plan includes new portables to be purchased or leased to provide additional capacity and some may be funded from impact fees. Enrollment projections reflect future need for additional capacity at the elementary level and unfunded facility needs will be reviewed in the future and reported in annual updates of the Capital Facilities Plan. No impact fees are requested for secondary schools in this Plan. For the Six-Year Finance Plan, costs of future schools are based on estimates from Kent School District Capital Planning Department. Please see pages 13-14 for a summary of the cost basis. KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 SIX-YEAR FINANCE PLAN Secured Unsecured Impact SCHOOL FACILITIES *2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 TOTAL Local & State State 2 or Local 3 Fees 5 Estimated Estimated PERMANENT FACILITIES New Elementary School - Kent Valley F $11,000,000 $16,000,000 $26,000,000 $53,000,000 $51,000,000 $2,000,000 Elementary Site Acquisition (10 acres)F $1,770,355 $1,770,355 $1,270,355 $500,000 New Academy Facility / 20 Classrooms F $5,000,000 $13,000,000 $18,000,000 $36,000,000 $30,000,000 $6,000,000 No Secondary School Projects at this time. TEMPORARY FACILITIES Additional portables 3 - 4 U $393,750 $393,750 $393,750 3 portables OTHER N / A Totals $18,164,105 $29,000,000 $44,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,164,105 $82,270,355 $0 $8,893,750 * F = Funded U = Unfunded NOTES: 2 The District anticipates receiving some State Funding Construction Assistance for some projects. 3 Facility needs are pending review. Some of these projects may be funded with impact fees. 4 Cost of portables based on current cost and adjusted for inflation for future years. 5 Fees in this column are based on amount of fees collected to date and estimated fees on future units. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 6 June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 415 Site Acquisitions & Costs Average of Sites Purchased, Sold or Built on within last 10 Years Type &# on Map School / Site Year Open / PurchasedSold Location Acreage Cost/Price Avg cost-price/acre Total Average Cost / Acre Elementary 12 / Urban Property Sale-29.7 acres of Plemons-Yeh site 2016 SSE 124th Ave and 284th ST SE 29.70 $947,536 $31,904 7 / Rural Property Sale - Scarsella site 2015 2900 Kent Black Diamond RD SE 13.25 $330,000 $24,906 3 / Rural Property Sale - Old Covington Parcel A, #362206-9081 2019 17070 SE Wax Rd, Covington 8.00 $3,869,697 $483,712 6 / Rural Property purchased for new elementary 2019 SE 264th St., Kent 10.00 $1,770,355 $177,036 Elementary Site Subtotal 60.95 $6,917,588 $113,496 Elem site average Middle School No Acquisitions for Middle School 0.00 $0 Middle School Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Middle Schl Site Avg. Senior High No Acquisitions for Senior Highs 0.00 $0 $0 Senior High Site Subtotal 0.00 $0 $0 Sr Hi Site Average Note: All rural sites were purchased prior to adoption of Urban Growth Area. Numbers correspond to locations on Site Bank & Acquisitions Map on Page 17. Properties purchased prior to 2010 1 / Urban Site - Covington area North (So of Mattson MS)1984 2 / Rural Site - Ham Lake east (Pollard)1992 4 / Urban Site - Shady Lake (Sowers-Blaine-Drahota-Paroline)1995 60.95 $6,917,588 5 / Rural Site - SE of Lake Morton area (West property)1993 10 / Urban Site - Yeh-Williams (W of 132 Ave SE at SE 288)1999 12 / Urban Site - SE 256th Covington (Halleson)2000 12a / Urban Site - 156th Ave. SE Covington (Wikstrom)2004 Total Acreage & Cost Total Average Cost / Acre $113,496 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan Table 7 June 2020 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 13 of 15 Cost Basis Summary For impact fee calculations, construction costs are based on cost of the last elementary school, adjusted for inflation, and projected cost of the future elementary schools and additional classrooms. Project Projected Cost New Elementary School Kent Valley (To open Fall 2021) $53,000,000 New Academy Facility (To open Fall 2021) $36,000,000 Site Acquisition Cost The site acquisition cost is based on an average cost of sites purchased or built on within the last ten years. Please see Table 7 for a list of site acquisition costs and averages. District Adjustment The impact fee calculations on Appendix B & C include a “District Adjustment” which is equal to the amount of increase that the impact fee formulas total for this year and adjusted for the increase in the Consumer Price Index (2.5%) for the Seattle metropolitan area. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 14 of 15 IX - Summary of Changes to June 2020 Capital Facilities Plan The Capital Facilities Plan (the "Plan") is updated annually based on previous Plans in effect since 1993. The primary changes from the June 2019 Plan are summarized here. Changes to capacity continue to reflect fluctuations in class size ratio as well as program changes. Changes in portables or transitional capacity reflect use, lease or purchase, sale, surplus and/or movement between facilities. The district worked with contractor David Demographics out of Riverside California to update student generation factors. The updated rates are included in the body of the Plan. The student headcount enrollment forecast is updated annually. All Elementary schools now have Full Day Kindergarten so six-year Kindergarten projections were previously modified to meet the requirements for Full Day Kindergarten programs at all elementary schools. The district expects to receive some State Funding Assistance (formerly called “state matching funds”) for projects in this Plan and tax credit factors are updated annually. Unfunded site and facility needs will be reviewed in the future. The impact fees for 2021 calendar year will increase by the percentage increase of the consumer price index for the Seattle metropolitan area. The increase for 2021 calendar year is 2.5%. For single-family residences, the fee will increase by $138.85 to $5,692.85. The impact fee for multi-family units will increase by $58.63 to $2,403.63. Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan June 2020 Page 15 of 15 X - Appendices Changes to Impact Fee Calculation Factors include: ITEM Grade/Type FROM TO Comments Student Generation Factor Elem 0.398 0.334 Single Family (SF) MS 0.096 0.078 SH 0.185 0.117 Total 0.679 0.529 0.150 Decrease Student Generation Factor Elem 0.117 0.117 Multi-Family (MF) MS 0.028 0.028 SH 0.029 0.048 Total 0.174 0.193 0.019 Increase State Funding Assistance Ratios (“State Match”) 56.96% 56.96% Per OSPI Website Area Cost Allowance $225.97 $225.97 Per OSPI Website Average Assessed Valuation (AV) SF $407,255 $423,247 Puget Sound ESD AV - Average of Condominiums & Apts. MF $151,126 $164,546 Puget Sound ESD Debt Service Capital Levy Rate / $1000 $1.04 $1.41 Per King Co. Assessor Report General Obligation Bond Interest Rate 3.95% 2.16% Bond Buyers 20 year GO Index Impact Fee - Single Family SF $5,554 $5,692.85 Increase of $138.85 or 2.5% Impact Fee - Multi-Family MF $2,345 $2,403.63 Increase of $58.63 or 2.5% KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT FACTORS FOR ESTIMATED IMPACT FEE CALCULATIONS Student Generation Factors - Single Family Student Generation Factors - Multi-FamilyElementary (Grades K - 6)0.334 Elementary 0.117Middle School (Grades 7 - 8)0.078 Middle School 0.028Senior High (Grades 9 - 12)0.117 Senior High 0.048 Total 0.529 Total 0.193 Projected Increased Student Capacity OSPI - Square Footage per Student Elementary 700 Elementary 90Middle School 0 Middle School 117Senior High (Academy)480 Senior High 130Special Education 144 Required Site Acreage per Facility Elementary (required)11 Average Site Cost / AcreMiddle School (required)21 Elementary $113,496Senior High (required)32 Middle School $0Senior High $0 New Facility Construction CostElementary *$53,000,000 Temporary Facility Capacity & CostMiddle School $0 Elementary @ 24 $0Senior High * (Academy)$36,000,000 Middle School @ 29 $0 * See cost basis on Pg. 26 Senior High @ 31 $0 Temporary Facility Square Footage State Funding Assistance CreditElementary143,372 District Funding Assistance Percentage 56.96%Middle School 10,736Senior High 21,296 Total 5.1%175,404 Construction Cost Allocation CCA - Cost/Sq, Ft. $238.22 Permanent Facility Square FootageElementary 1,571,558Middle School 764,809 District Average Assessed ValueSenior High 1,048,939 Single Family Residence $426,418 Total 94.9%3,385,306 Total Facilities Square Footage District Average Assessed ValueElementary1,714,930 Multi-Family Residence $177,957Middle School 775,545Senior High 1,070,235 Total 3,560,710 Bond Levy Tax Rate/$1,000 1.41 Current Rate / 1,000 Tax Rate 0.0014 Developer Provided Sites / FacilitiesValue 0 General Obligation Bond Interest RateDwelling Units 0 Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16% CPI Inflation Factor 2.50% Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX A)June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student Factor A 1 (Elementary)11 $113,496 700 0.334 $595.69A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 0 0.078 $0.00 A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 480 0.117 $0.00 Total 64 $113,496 1,180 0.529A $595.69 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Single Family Residence Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent/Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$53,000,000 700 0.334 0.903 $22,835.58 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.078 0.984B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 480 0.117 0.998 $8,757.45 Total $89,000,000 1,180 0.529 B $31,593.03 Temporary Facility Cost per Single Family Residence (Portables) Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.334 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.078 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.117 0.02 $0Total$0 84 0.529 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Single Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Construction Cost Allocation SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Assistance %Student FactorD 1 (Elementary)$238.22 90 0.5696 0.334 $4,078.84 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 117 0.5696 0.078 $1,238D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 130 0.5696 0.117 $2,064D $7,381.00 Tax Credit per Single Family ResidenceAverage SF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$426,418 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $5,351.12 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16%Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per SF Residence $595.69 B = Permanent Facility Cost per Residence $31,593.03 C = Temporary Facility Cost per Residence $0.00 Subtotal $32,188.72 D = State Match Credit per Residence $7,381.00 TC = Tax Credit per Residence $5,351.12 Subtotal $12,732.12 Total Unfunded Need $19,456.60 50% Developer Fee Obligation $9,728 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)$0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)($4,035) Net Fee Obligation per Residence - Single Family $5,692.85 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX B)June 2020 KENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IMPACT FEE CALCULATION for MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCE Site Acquisition Cost per Multi-Family Residence UnitFormula: ((Acres x Cost per Acre) / Facility Capacity) x Student Generation Factor Required Site Acreage Average Site Cost/Acre Facility Capacity Student FactorA 1 (Elementary)11 $113,496 700 0.117 $208.67A 2 (Middle School)21 $0 0 0.028A 3 (Senior High)32 $0 480 0.048 $0.00Total$64 113,496 1,180 0.193A $208.67 Permanent Facility Construction Cost per Multi-Family Residence Unit Formula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Permanent / Total Square Footage Ratio) Construction Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio B 1 (Elementary)$53,000,000 700 0.117 0.903 $7,999.29 B 2 (Middle School)$0 0 0.028 0.984 B 3 (Senior High)$36,000,000 480 0.048 0.998 $3,592.80Total$89,000,000 1,180 0.193 B $11,592.09 Temporary Facility Cost per Multi-Family Residence UnitFormula: ((Facility Cost / Facility Capacity) x Student Factor) x (Temporary / Total Square Footage Ratio) Facility Cost Facility Capacity Student Factor Footage Ratio C 1 (Elementary)$0 24 0.117 0.097 $0.00 C 2 (Middle School)$0 29 0.028 0.016 $0 C 3 (Senior High)$0 31 0.048 0.02 $0Total$0 84 C $0.00 State Funding Assistance Credit per Multi-Family Residence (formerly "State Match") Formula: Area Cost Allowance x SPI Square Feet per student x Funding Assistance % x Student Factor Area Cost Allowance SPI Sq. Ft. / Student Equalization %Student Factor D 1 (Elementary)$238.22 90 0.5696 0.117 $1,428.82 D 2 (Middle School)$238.22 117 0.5696 0.028 $445 D 3 (Senior High)$238.22 130 0.5696 0.048 $847D $2,720.04 Tax Credit per Multi Family Residence Average MF Residential Assessed Value (AAV)$177,957 Net Present Value (per EQ) (NPV)8.90 Current Debt Service Rate / 1,000 ( r )0.14%TC $2,233.18 (Below used to calculate NPV) Current Bond Interest Rate 2.16% Years Amortized (10 Years)- Used in NPV Calculation 10 Developer Provided Facility Credit Facility / Site Value Dwelling Units 0 0 FC 0 Fee Recap A = Site Acquisition per Multi-Family Unit $208.67 B = Permanent Facility Cost per MF Unit $11,592.09 C = Temporary Facility Cost per MF Unit $0.00 Subtotal $11,800.76 D = State Match Credit per MF Unit $2,720.04 TC = Tax Credit per MF Unit $2,233.18 Subtotal -$4,953.23 Total Unfunded Need $6,847.53 50% Developer Fee Obligation $3,424 FC = Facility Credit (if applicable)0 District Adjustment (see page 28 for explanation)($1,019) Net Fee Obligation per Residential Unit - Multi-family $2,404.63 Kent School District Six-Year Capital Facilities Plan (APPENDIX C)June 2020 -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 17 Exhibit E.4 Dieringer School District Capital Facility Plan 1L. dDieringer School DistrictCapital Facilities Plan2021-2026DRAFTBoard Approval scheduled on August 17, 2020 DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICTN0. 3431320-l 78'h Avenue EastLake Tapps, Washington 98391(253) 862-2537BOARD OFDIRECTORSMegan BearorGreg GarrisonGreg JohnsonScott ReisnouerChelsea SteinerMichael Farmer, Superintendent DieringerEducating every child forConfidence today andContribution tomorrow Dieringer School District No. 343An OverviewEstablished in 1890, Dieringer School District consolidated with Lake Tapps SchoolDistrict in 1936. The District's three schools, Lake Tapps Elementary School, DieringerHeights Elementary School and North Tapps Middle School, provide K through 8thgrade education, and serve as hubs for community activities as well. Dieringer SchoolDistrict #343 is located in unincorporated Pierce County, bounded on the east by theWhite River, on the west by the Stuck River, on the north by the city of Auburn, and onthe south by the cities of Bonney Lake and Sumner. The District surrounds the northerntwo-thirds of Lake Tapps and covers approximately 5.5 square miles.The current student enrollment is approximately 1,523 students in grades kindergartenthrough eight. Students in grades first through third are housed at Lake TappsElementary, constructed i?n 2005 as a replacement project. Construction was complete onan addition in the September 2017, Dieringer Heights Elementary opened in the fall of2000 and is home to students in kindergarten, fourth and fifth grade. Dieringer HeightsElementary also houses two inclusion preschool classrooms. Originally constructed in1992 and added on to in 1998 and 2009, North Tapps Middle School houses students ingrades sixth-eighth. The district supports an additional 540 high school students whomay select to attend any public high school. The majority chose to attend AuburnRiverside, Sumner and Bonney Lake High Schools.The district has a long standing history of providing high quality education for all ourstudents. Our goal is for our students to gain the skills that will allow them to becomesuccessful, confident, contributing members of society. Dieringer is composed ofstudents who come to school well prepared and eager to learn. Parents are concerned withstudent success and provide outstanding support for their children and the DieringerSchool District. The PTA and many volunteers contribute countless hours and resourcesto our schools and students. The community supports the schools through the passage offunding issues to support bus acquisition, student access to current technology and theconstruction of school facilities. Impact fees, including interest, are held in reserve untilused to meet District identified needs for site acquisition, additional facilities andimprovements and/or tecmology capital expenditures. DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2020Current Facilities Inventory of Public SchoolsNAMELake Tapps ElementaryDieringer Heights ElementaryNorth Tapps Middle SchoolHigh SchoolCAPACITY357508536oLOCATION1320-178fh Ave F,., Lake Tapps21727 - 34fh St. ]E., Lake Tapps20029- 12th st., E., Lake TappsTOTAL1,401 r.1ZH luz:ff11'q?=rW?ll?an?'Wilzaz1-lZRI)11.J:"l.,l:ll $1!l?11lr-?01%(r'if!1aa!Ifflii il?i ll101lIiIi l=k991iil zelili li t'-j.'6/'? ' .'il."J4,Ill-Al'fml mci:Ia0W##'7'?ntoB@ Dieringer School District Proposed HousingPotential Enrollment InereaseJune 2020Proposed Housing Units:*Single Family- 224 x .381 generation factor = 85.3 students K-8Enrollment Impact:85.3 students K-8Estimated 17.1 students a year over the period 2021-2026Potential emollment increase = 5.6o/o (based on 1,523 enrollment 4/20)Increase per grade level = 9.5 students (based on 9 grade bands)Approximately students per school: 28.4* *District enrollment based on 4/ 19 and potential growth =1,608.3 / 1654.3District program capacity = 1,401 students*Generation factor based on an average of 2019 Sumner .429 and Auburn .333* *Numbers at'e without and with preschool students, respectively Enrollment ProjectionsThe Dieringer School District is located in an area that continues to experience gromh.This growth can be noted by reviewing the following indicators: enrollment trend data,proposed housing development, and the mitigation impact fees received for newconstruction.The District continues to experience steady growth in student enrollment. This hasslightly exceeded the Pierce County and Puget Sound Educational Service District(PSESD) enrollment growth over the same period. A review of proposed constructionwithin the borders of the Dieringer School District indicates that the growth trend can beexpected to continue over the next four years and beyond. The growth this year has beenhigher than anticipated. There are 224 single family residents slated for constructionwithin the next five years. These projects, together with individual lots and general in-migration, are anticipated to generate an additional 85.3 students in kindergarten througheighth grade.To partially address this growth, the District passed a 2006 bond issue to construct anadditional five classrooms at Dieringer Heights Elementary. Those classrooms werecompleted and occupied in 2009. The bond issue also provided for the addition of anauxiliary gym, health and fitness classroom, and four science rooms at North TappsMiddle School. Those projects were completed in 2009 and the new instructional spacesare in use. At Lake Tapps Elementary School the constmction of 3 new classrooms wascompleted in September 2017. HOUSING DEVELOPMENT/POTENTIAL ENROLLMENT INCREASE#1 Fairweather Cove Estates (18)28 lots total8 lots sold (Lived in) (1 on 2 lots combined)18 active lot listings2 active construction2011 permit for PSE replacing 3 power poles1600-2000 block of 16th st. @ the 17500-17800 block of Sumner-Tapps Hwy.#2 Rainier Plateau (10)10 lots totalPermit approvedBehind DHESNo active buildingEnd of 34'h St.#3 Tapps Meadows (6)lOLots4 completedAcross from Snag Island#4 Country Creek Estates (1)9 out 10 lots builtRemaining lot filed for Plat Alteration 2007Off 15th near Edwards Road#5 Forest Canyon Estates (124)l year extension approved (Applied 3/2018)Owner Kenneth Atkinson124 lots; Behind Al Lago/off Forest Canyon Rd.#6 The Ridge at Lake Tapps (45)No active permits45 Single Family Lots -32XX Sumner Tapps Hwy. E./next to al Lago#7 Maryanski Plat (4)Short Plat (4 or less. Usually 6-month completion time)- 4 Single Family Lots; 40"l St. E and 230"l Ave E- No active buildingToward Wildview Ridge#8 Franklin Northlake (16)-Active site; pre-build-16 Single Family Lots-off Lake Tapps PkwySingle Family Units to be built: 224 Standard of ServiceThe Dieringer School District houses children in elementary schools serving studentspreschool through fifth grade and a middle school that houses grades six through eighth.High school students, grades nine through twelve, attend adjacent high schools, primarilyin the Auburn and Sumner School Districts.Dieringer School District follows a traditional school calendar beginning in earlySeptember and completing in mid June. The daily school schedules begin between 7:49and 8:45 a.m. and end between 2:17 and 3:15 p.m.The Dieringer School District standard of service is based on class size and programdecisions adopted by the Dieringer School District Board of Directors. Based on thelegislative funding regarding class size, the targeted number of students per classroomkindergarten through third grade 17, fourth through fifth and sixth grade 27 and seventhrough eighth grade 28. These class sizes have an impact on facilities and the permanentcapacity of each school reflects these class sizes.In the District, rooms designated and assigned for special use are not counted as capacityclassrooms. At the elementary level students are provided music instruction and physicaleducation in non-capacity classrooms. Special education and intervention programs areprovided as pullout programs and do not provide capacity. At the middle school level,instruction is organized around a six period day; classrooms are calculated as providing5/6 capacity to accommodate teacher planning time in the instuctional space. DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 343Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2020Dieringer School District Service StandardsPublic School Facilities(Square Feet Per Student)Elementary SchoolMiddle SchoolJunior HighHigh School139148NANADieringer School District Individual Capacity Proiects (2020-2025)Elementary School #3High School433NA DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 343PERMANENT CAPACITY PROJECTSMASTER SCHEDULEJune, 2020NameCurrent 6 - Year TotalCapacityCapacityCapacity 2020 2021 2022 ? 2024 2025Lake Tapps Elementary 357357Dieringer Heights Elem. 508508Elementary #3433433North Tapps MS53653614014331834433TOTALS DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 343Capital Facilities Plan Update, June 2020CFP Projects and Financing PlanSources and Uses of Funds(x $1,000)Sources of FundsExisting Revenue:ReserveNew Revenue:Bonds, Levies, Fees, State MatchingFunds, Dedications, Mitigation PaymentsTOTAL SOURCESUses of FundsElementary #3Non-Capacity Projects:School Site, Technology Upgrades,And Board Approved ProjectsTOTAL USESBAIANCE$3,254$33,099$36,273($30,538)l($36,273)o DIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 343FINANCE PLAN 2021-2026June 2020Permanent Capacity ProjectsUnsecured Source of FundsSecured Source of FundsEstimated EstimatedAmt Estimated Impact Levy,Bond& Unrestr Impact?Levy,Bond Unrestrict@d ? ? ? ?School Site Elem. No. 3Total Capacity Projects25,275,00025,275,00025,034,90125,034,9014,0009,0004,0009,000oooo227,099227,099Non-Capacity ProjectsSchool Site Elem. No. 35,263,356Technology Improvements 5,735,558Total Non-Capacity Projects 10,998,9144,51 "i ,9353,528,8928,040,827oo10,000o10,000oo751,4212,196,66602,196,666 751,421oooTOTAL PROJECTS36,273,91433,075,728'i<,ooo g,ooo 2,196,666 751,421 227,099 Time PeriodDIERINGER SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 343Capital Facilities Plan Update, 2020Capital Facilities Requirements to 2026ShidentStudentNet ReservePopulationCapacityOr (Deficiency)2020 Actual1523.02021-2026 Growth85.31401433(122)347.7ElementarySchools$57,639Dieringer School District Cost Per Student(2020 Dollars)MiddleJunior HighSchools?$64,467NAHighSchoolsNA School Impact Fee Calculation 6/20DISTRICTDieringer School DistrictSchool S}te Acquisition Cost:AcresxCost per Acre)/Facility Capaci+y)xS+uden+ Generotion FactorStudentS+udentFacility i Cost/Facility i FactorFactorAcreage iAcreCapacityiSFRMFR1200 $438,6134330.3220.17201300070Elementary #3MiddleCost/SFR$3,909Cost/MFR.2,091TOTAL[$3qqSchool Construction Cost:Facili+y Cost/Facili+y Capacity)xStuden+ Generation Factor)x(permanent/Total Sq F+:Student i StudentFactor l FactorSFR i MFR0.322 l O.1720.130 l O.070TOTALElementary #3Facility Facili+yCost i Capacity$25,275,000 l 433rCost/SFR18,796$18,796 lCost/MFR$10,040?Temporar5r Facility Cost:((Facility Cost/Facility CapaciElementaiMiddle%Temp/ i Facili+yTotal Sq.Fti Cos+xStudent Generation Factor)x(TemiStuden+Facility i FactorSizeiSFR$00$oorory/Total Square Feet,'Studen+Cost/FactorSFRMFR0.3220.1300.1720.070Cost/MFRTOTALr'm'flState Matching Credit:Boeckh Index X SPI Square Footage X District Match % X Studenf FactorStudentStudentDistrict i FactorFoc'torMatch % ISFRMFRBoeckhIndexSPIFootageCos+/SFRCost/MFRElementaiMiddleTax Payment Credit:Averoge Assessed Value 2020Capital Bond Interest Rate (est) 5/20Net Present Value of Average DwellirvProperty Tax Levy Ra+e2020Present Value of Revenue S+reamFee Sumary:Site Acquistion CostsPermanent Facility Cos+Temporary Facility CostState Motch CredilTax Payment CreditFEEFEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50%FEE WITH DISCOUNT OF 50%rrTOTAL[Single?$3,909.23$1 8,795.73$0.00$0.00j$14,352.38jS8,353ql"irMultipleT?$2,090.7610,039.95$0.00$0.00l$lO,552.53151 ,578'?muSFRMFR$653,162 l $480,2350.40%0.40%$6,390,194 l $4,698,367ioi10$2.2460 l $2.2460$14,352prlll lllt -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 18 Exhibit E.5 City of Auburn Capital Facility Plan City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN (2021 – 2026) Adopted by Ordinance No. xxxx, December xx, 2020 as part of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan City of Auburn 25 West Main Auburn, WA 98001 (253) 931-3000 www.auburnwa.gov City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN 2021 – 2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction Purpose .................................................................................................................................. 7 Statutory Requirement for Capital Facilities Elements ............................................................ 7 Concurrency and Level of Service .......................................................................................... 8 Implementation ....................................................................................................................... 8 2. Goals and Policies 1. Capital Facilities Response to Growth .............................................................................. 11 2. Financial Feasibility .......................................................................................................... 11 3. Public Health and Environment ......................................................................................... 13 4. Consistency with Regional Planning ................................................................................. 13 3. Capital Improvements Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 15 Transportation ........................................................................................................................ 17 Arterial Street (102) Capital Projects ................................................................................. 22 Local Street (103) Capital Projects ................................................................................... 61 Street Preservation Fund (105) Capital Projects ............................................................... 65 Water...................................................................................................................................... 79 Sanitary Sewer ....................................................................................................................... 125 Storm Drainage ...................................................................................................................... 143 Parks, Arts and Recreation ..................................................................................................... 171 General Municipal Buildings ................................................................................................... 195 Community Improvements ...................................................................................................... 207 Airport..................................................................................................................................... 225 Cemetery ................................................................................................................................ 239 Valley Regional Fire Authority ................................................................................................ 243 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A capital facilities element is one of the comprehensive plan elements required by Washington’s Growth Management Act (GMA). Capital facilities generally have long useful lives, significant costs and tend not to be mobile. The GMA requires that capital facilities elements include an inventory of existing capital facilities showing locations and capacities, a forecast of future needs for such capital facilities, proposed locations and capacities of new or expanded capital facilities and at least a six-year plan to finance capital facilities with identified sources of funding. The GMA also requires that the land use element be reassessed if probable funding falls short of existing needs. This document is the City’s six-year Capital Facilities Plan (CFP). The CFP, in conjunction with other City adopted documents, satisfies the GMA requirement for a Capital Facilities Element. It addresses one of the GMA’s basic tenets: to provide adequate facilities to support development in accordance with locally adopted level of service standards. This CFP will enable the City to: (1) make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars, and (2) make timely decisions about maintaining level of service in accordance with this CFP and other adopted plans. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN CONTENT This CFP consists of the following: Chapter 1. Introduction Purpose of CFP, statutory requirements, methodology. Chapter 2. Goals and Policies Goals and policies related to the provision of capital facilities. Chapter 3. Capital Improvements Proposed capital projects, which include the financing plan and reconciliation of project capacity to level of service (LOS) standards. This CFP is a companion document to the Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The Capital Facilities Element of the Auburn Comprehensive Plan identifies the City’s planning approach and policy framework for the provision of capital facilities. This CFP provides the background inventory, identifies proposed projects and establishes the six-year capital facilities plan for financing capital facilities. The comprehensive plan contains timeframes that are the intended framework for future funding decisions and within which future actions and decisions are intended to occur. However, these timeframes are estimates; depending on factors involved in the processing of applications and project work, and the availability of funding, the timing may change from the included timeframes. The framework does not represent actual commitments by the City of Auburn that may depend on funding resources available. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 2 GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS In planning for capital facilities, contemplation of future growth needs to be considered. The CFP is based on the following City population forecast: Year Population 2020 81,940 2021 83,005 2026 87,239 The population forecasts are based on information from the State of Washington Office of Financial Management (OFM) as well as estimates developed by the City of Auburn Planning and Community Development Department. CAPITAL COSTS OF FACILITIES Based on the analysis of capital improvements contained in this document, the cost of City- owned and managed capital improvements for 2021- 2026 is summarized as follows: Type of Facility 2021 - 2026 Transportation - Arterial (102)42,717,401$ Transportation - Local (103)10,600,000 Transportation - Street (105)15,545,652 Water 45,799,698 Sanitary Sewer 15,936,000 Storm Drainage 21,305,100 Parks, Arts & Recreation 13,583,850 General Municipal Buildings 7,661,320 Community Improvements 8,466,310 Airport 16,491,360 Cemetery 395,000 Total 198,501,691$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 3 FINANCING FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES The financing plan for the citywide capital improvements includes: Funding Source 2021 - 2026 Capital Facility Grants 12,594,382 Transportation 2,378,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation 590,000 General Municipal Buildings 2,147,240 Community Improvements 655,970 Storm Drainage 225,000 Water 4,480,830 Airport User Fees / Fund Balance 32,640,364 Water 16,516,667 Sewer 21,229,797 Storm Drainage 395,000 Cemetery 298,000 Equipment Rental 408,980 Facilities 2,689,630 Airport Arterial Street Fund 7,590,000 Transportation Arterial Street Preservation Fund 13,525,000 Transportation Local Revitalization Fund 240,500 Community Improvements Bond Proceeds 3,810,900 Airport 8,620,000 Water DWSRF Loan 4,895,000 Water Municipal Parks Fund 300,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Property Tax 918,500 Parks, Arts & Recreation Mitigation/Impact Fees 19,388,671 Transportation 5,982,350 Parks, Arts & Recreation 850,000 General Municipal Buildings 759,570 Community Improvements REET 1 4,672,340 General Municipal Buildings 2,250,000 Transportation - Local Streets 1,250,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation REET 2 4,469,000 Community Improvements 180,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation 400,000 Transportation - Arterial Streets 1,450,000 Transportation - Local Streets Other Sources 4,765,000 Transportation - Arterial Streets 6,000,000 Transportation - Local Streets 850,000 Community Improvements 5,510,000 Airport 2,575,000 Parks, Arts & Recreation Total 198,501,691$ (Includes grant funding that has not been secured) City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 4 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS The forecasted impacts of new capital facilities on the City’s future operating budgets (2022-2027) are as follows: Budget Year:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Transportation 6,350$ 9,850$ 13,850$ 18,350$ 20,850$ 23,350$ 92,600$ 2 Water - - - - - 600 600 3 Sanitary Sewer - - - - - - - 4 Storm Drainage - - - - - - - 5 Parks, Arts and Recreation 15,000 15,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 22,000 103,000 6 General Municipal Buildings 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 95,000 570,000 7 Community Improvements (137,500) (137,500) (137,500) (127,500) (127,500) (127,500) (795,000) 8 Airport - - 2,000 2,000 4,000 4,000 12,000 9 Cemetery - - - - - - - Total (21,150)$ (17,650)$ (9,650)$ 4,850$ 9,350$ 17,450$ (16,800)$ Project summary details are located on the following pages: Transportation page 77 Water page 124 Parks & Recreation page 193 General Municipal Buildings page 206 Community Improvements page 224 Airport page 238 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 5 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) CONSEQUENCES OF THE CFP Based on the proposed six-year capital projects and the projected population increase of 4,234 (5%) between 2021 and 2026, the LOS for the following City-owned public facilities will change as follows: The LOS for the following facilities will be increased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2021 LOS to the projected 2026 LOS. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2021 LOS 2026 LOS (Projected) Community Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.2.83 3.20 Linear Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.0.20 0.23 Neighborhood Parks Acres per 1,000 Pop.0.78 0.85 The LOS for the following facilities will be maintained as a result of the CFP. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2021 LOS 2026 LOS (Projected) Roads Volume/Capacity Ratio "D""D" Airport % Air Operations Support 100%100% Cemetery Burial Plots per 1,000 Pop.33.00 33.00 Sanitary Sewer Residential GPCPD (Note 1)171.00 171.00 Storm Drainage N/A Water Residential GPCPD (Note 1)230.00 230.00 Note 1: GPCPD = Gallons per Customer per Day The LOS for the following facilities will be decreased as a result of the CFP, comparing the 2021 LOS to the projected 2026 LOS. CAPITAL FACILITY LOS UNITS 2021 LOS 2026 LOS (Projected) General Municipal Buildings Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop.3,767.77 3,630.76 Open Space Acres per 1,000 Pop.4.61 4.44 Senior Center Sq. Ft. per 1,000 Pop.146.98 139.85 Special Use Areas Acres per 1,000 Pop.3.06 2.92 Level of Service (LOS) is a common measure used to determine the efficiency or effectiveness of services. For the City of Auburn, LOS targets serves as a means to assess the adequacy of public facilities in meeting the needs of the population for which it serves. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 6 For example, in the case of park space, when there is an increase in population without a corresponding increase in park acreage, the LOS unit of measure (acres per 1,000 population) will decline, indicating a potential need to increase the total amount of park acreage to keep pace with population growth. On the other hand, a slight increase in population, coupled with a large increase in facilities, will result in an increased LOS. For example, facilities such as buildings or burial plots may be constructed or expanded to keep pace with anticipated population growth. While this will have the effect of increasing LOS in the short-term, in the longer-term, the LOS will gradually decline to the targeted level based on forecasted population. The impact of population growth to the LOS for facilities will vary depending on the type of facility and long range planning by the City. CFP ELEMENT SOURCE DOCUMENTS Documents used in preparing this Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) are principally the comprehensive plans for the various public facilities included in this CFP. These individual comprehensive plans provide detailed identification of projects and identify their (projects) proposed funding sources. City documents include: • City-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2015) • City Municipal Airport Master Plan Update (2012-2032) • City Comprehensive Water Plan (2015) • City Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2015) and Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (2021-2026) • City Comprehensive Drainage Plan (2015) • City Comprehensive Sewer Plan (2015)  City 2021-22 Biennial Budget and 2019 Annual Financial Report; and, • City Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan Update (2015), as well as numerous other planning and financial documents. All documents are available for public inspection at the City of Auburn. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 7 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is a 6-year plan (2021-2026) for capital improvements that support the City of Auburn’s current and future growth. In this plan, funding for general government projects is identified. To maintain consistency with individual master and utility comprehensive plans, applicable projects in the 6-year window of those master/utility plans are included in this CFP. The CFP also identifies LOS standards, where applicable, for each public facility. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL FACILITIES ELEMENTS RCW 36.70A.070(3)(d) requires that the comprehensive plan capital facilities element include “a six-year plan that will finance such capital facilities within projected funding capacities and clearly identifies sources of public money for such purposes.” RCW 36.70A.070(3)(e) requires that all capital facilities have “probable funding” to pay for capital facility needs, or else the City must “reassess the land use element.” In addition, the capital facilities element must include the location and capacity of existing facilities, a forecast of future needs, and their proposed locations and capacities. The State Growth Management Act (GMA) guidelines suggest that this analysis be accomplished for water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm water facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities, police and fire protection facilities. The GMA also seeks the selection of level of service standards for capital facilities. As a result, public facilities in the CFP should be based on quantifiable, objective measures of capacity such as traffic volume, capacity per mile of road and acres of park per capita. In some instances, though, level of service may best be expressed in terms of qualitative statements of satisfaction with a particular public facility. Factors that influence local level of service standards include, but are not limited to, community goals, national and local standards, and Federal and State mandates. To be effective, the CFP must be updated on a regular basis. State GMA guidelines suggest that the CFP be updated at least every two years. With this in mind, the City will follow these guidelines and update the CFP at least every two years, incorporating the capital facilities improvements in the City’s biennial budget process. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 8 CONCURRENCY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE Concurrency The GMA requires that jurisdictions have certain capital facilities in place or available within a specified time frame when development occurs. This concept is called concurrency. Under the GMA, concurrency is required for transportation facilities and is recommended by the State for certain other public facilities, namely potable water and sanitary sewer. Concurrency has a direct relationship to level of service. The importance of concurrency to capital facilities planning is that development may be denied if it reduces the level of service for a capital facility below the locally adopted minimum. The level of service is unique for each type of facility and is presented in the subsequent sections. Explanation of Level of Service As indicated earlier, the GMA requires that level of service be established for certain transportation facilities for the purposes of applying concurrency to development proposals. The State GMA guidelines recommend the adoption of level of service standards for other capital facilities to measure the provision of adequate public facilities. Typically, measures of level of service are expressed as ratios of facility capacity to demand (i.e., actual or potential users). Table 1-1 lists generic examples of level of service measures for some capital facilities: TABLE 1-1 Sample Level of Service Measurements The need for capital facilities is largely determined by a community’s adopted LOS standards and whether or not the community has formally designated capital facilities, other than transportation, as necessary for development to meet the concurrency test. The CFP itself is therefore largely influenced by the selection of the level of service standards. Level of service standards are measures of the quality of life in the City. The standards should be based on the City’s vision of its future and its values. IMPLEMENTATION Implementation of the CFP requires constant monitoring and evaluation. The CFP is sensitive to funding and revenue availability and therefore needs to be constantly monitored against variations in available resources. To facilitate its implementation, the CFP should be kept current. Type of Facility Sample Level of Service Measure General Municipal Buildings Square feet per 1,000 population Parks Acres per 1,000 population Roads and Streets Ratio of actual volume to design capacity Sewer / Water Gallons per customer per day City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 9 Update of Capital Facilities Plan Perhaps the most desirable way to keep the CFP current is to update it regularly so the six- year plan is a rolling CFP. Again, the State recommends that the CFP be updated at least biennially. The City of Auburn will seek to update the CFP at least biennially in conjunction with the budget process. Future updates will consider: A. Revision of population projections, including annexations; B. Update of inventory of public facilities; C. Update of costs of public facilities; D. Update of public facilities requirements analysis (actual level of service compared to adopted standards); E. Update of revenue forecasts; F. Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next six fiscal years; and, G. Update analysis of financial capacity. Amendments to the CFP, including amendments to level of service standards, capital projects, and/or the financing plan sources of revenue are all actions that can keep the CFP current and relevant to City decision-making. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 10 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 11 CHAPTER 2 GOALS AND POLICIES This chapter identifies goals and policies specific to the City’s provision of capital facilities. Goal 1 Provide a variety of responses to the demands of growth on public facilities. Policy 1.1 Establish land use patterns that optimize the use of public facilities. Policy 1.2 Provide additional public facility capacity when existing facilities are used to their maximum level of efficiency (consistent with adopted standards for level of service). Policy 1.3 Encourage development where new public facilities can be provided in an efficient manner. Policy 1.4 Exempt the following from the concurrency management program: 1.4.1 Development vested by RCW 19.27.095, 58.17.033 or 58.17.170. 1.4.2 Development that creates no added impact on public facilities. 1.4.3 Expansions of existing development that were disclosed and tested for concurrency as part of the original application. Goal 2 Provide needed public facilities that are within the ability of the City to fund or within the City’s authority to require others to provide. Policy 2.1 Establish level of service standards that are achievable with the financing plan of this Capital Facilities Plan. Policy 2.2 Base the financing plan for public facilities on realistic estimates of current local revenues and external revenues that are reasonably anticipated to be received by the City. Policy 2.3 Match revenue sources to capital projects based on sound fiscal policies. 2.3.1 The City shall continue to fund utility costs through utility enterprise funds, based on user fees and grants. Public facilities included in utilities are sewer, solid waste, storm drainage, and water. 2.3.2 Where feasible pursue joint venture facility construction, construction timing, and other facility coordination measures for City provided facilities, as well as with school districts and other potential partners in developing public facilities. 2.3.3 The City shall continue to assist through direct participation, LIDs and payback agreements, where appropriate and financially feasible. Where funding is available, the City may participate in developer initiated facility extensions or improvements, but only to the extent that the improvements benefit the broader public interest, and are consistent with the policies of this Capital Facilities Plan. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 12 Policy 2.4 If the projected funding is inadequate to finance needed public facilities and utilities based on adopted level of service standards and forecasted growth, the City will do one or more of the following to achieve a balance between available revenue and needed public facilities: 2.4.1 Lower the level of service standards; 2.4.2 Increase the amount of revenue from existing sources; 2.4.3 Adopt new sources of revenue; 2.4.4 Require developers to provide such facilities at their own expense; and/or 2.4.5 Amend the Land Use Element to reduce the need for additional public facilities. Policy 2.5 Both existing and future development will pay for the costs of needed capital improvements. 2.5.1 Ensure that existing development pays for capital improvements that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, and pays for some or all of the cost to replace obsolete or worn out facilities. Existing development may also pay a portion of the cost of capital improvements needed by future development. Existing development’s payments may take the form of user fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. 2.5.2 Ensure that future development pays a proportionate share of the cost of new facilities that it requires. Future development may also pay a portion of the cost to replace obsolete or worn-out facilities. Future development’s payments may take the form of voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, mitigation payments, capacity fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user’s fees, charges for services, special assessments and taxes. Policy 2.6 The City will determine the priority of public facility capital improvements using the following criteria as general guidelines. Any revenue source that cannot be used for the highest priority will be used beginning with the highest priority for which the revenue can legally be expended. 2.6.1 Projects that eliminate hazardous conditions. 2.6.2 Refurbishment of existing facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining standards for adopted level of service. 2.6.3 New or expanded facilities that reduce or eliminate deficiencies in level of service for existing demand. 2.6.4 New or expanded facilities that provide the adopted level of service for new development and redevelopment during the next six fiscal years. 2.6.5 Capital improvements that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility, or otherwise mitigate impacts of public facilities on future operating budgets. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 13 2.6.6 Capital improvements that contribute to stabilizing and developing the economy of the City. 2.6.7 Project priorities may also involve additional criteria that are unique to each type of public facility, as described in other elements of this Comprehensive Plan. Policy 2.7 Ensure that the ongoing operating and maintenance costs of a capital facility are financially feasible prior to constructing the facility. Goal 3 Protect public health, environmental quality, and neighborhood stability and viability through the appropriate design and installation of public facilities. Policy 3.1 Promote conservation of energy, water and other natural resources in the location and design of public facilities. Policy 3.2 Require the separation of sanitary and storm sewer facilities wherever combined sewers may be discovered. Policy 3.3 Practice efficient and environmentally responsible maintenance and operating procedures. Policy 3.4 The siting, design, construction and improvement of all public buildings shall be done in full compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Policy 3.5 Promote economic and community stability and growth through strategic investments in public facilities and public private/partnerships. Goal 4 Make the Capital Facilities Plan consistent with other elements of the comprehensive plan, and - to the extent feasible - with other city, county, regional and state adopted plans. Policy 4.1 Ensure that the growth and development assumptions used in the Capital Facilities Plan are consistent with similar assumptions in other elements of the comprehensive plan. Policy 4.2 Coordinate with non-city providers of public facilities on a joint program for maintaining applicable level of service standards, concurrency requirements, funding and construction of public facilities. Goal 5 Provide public facilities that provide a sense of community that is inclusive of diverse populations. Policy 5.1 Contribute to community pride and foster a sense of community through provision of public facilities that create a community-gathering place for neighbors, family and friends. Policy 5.2 Through provision of public facilities, offer a broad range of activities promoting social interactions especially with new residents. Policy 5.3 Provide maximum flexibility and multiple uses through design of public facilities that are adaptable to changing interests. Policy 5.4 Provide a community center facility that is financially feasible, affordable for participants, and can generate revenue to offset a portion of the operating costs. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 14 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 15 CHAPTER 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1. INTRODUCTION This CFP includes City capital improvement projects and the financing plan to pay for those projects. It also contains the inventory of existing City facilities, and identifies level of service standards, where applicable. Each type of City public facility is presented in a separate subsection that follows a standard format. Throughout this section, t ables of data are identified with abbreviations that correspond to the type of facility. For example, Table W-1 refers to Table 1 for Water (Supply and Distribution). Each abbreviation corresponds to the name of the type of facility. 1. Narrative Summary This is an overview of the data, with sections devoted to Current Facilities, Level of Service, Capital Facilities Projects and Financing, and Impact on Future Operating Budgets. 2. Inventory of Facilities (Table X-1) This is a list of existing capital facilities, including the name, capacity (for reference to level of service), and location. This table also includes any proposed capital projects and the planned inventory total through December 31, 2026. 3. Capital Projects and Financing Plan (Table X-2, X-2A and X-2B) This list of capital improvements identifies existing deficiencies, identifies facilities needed for future growth, and identifies the need to repair or replace obsolete or worn out facilities through December 31, 2026. Each list shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. 4. Impact on Future Operating Budgets (Table X-3) This is a list of capital projects and the forecasted impacts on the City’s future operating budgets (2022 – 2027). City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 16 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 17 TRANSPORTATION Current Facilities Roadways: The City’s street system consists of a network of approximately 252 miles of arterials, collectors, local streets and alleys. Existing non-motorized facilities include a mix of trails, sidewalks, and both dedicated and shared bicycle facilities. Signals and ITS: The City’s transportation system also includes ninety-five traffic signals, a Traffic Control Center employing Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), which centrally directs the signals, more than 76 CCTV cameras, and various traffic beacons all communicating on a network of copper wire and fiber optic cable. The City also has two roundabouts. Transit: King County Metro Transit, Sound Transit and Pierce Transit serve the Auburn area. Auburn is currently served by eight Metro, two Sound Transit, and one Pierce Transit bus route. In addition, Sound Transit “Sounder” commuter trains provide peak hour and midday service at the Auburn Station. The Sounder also provides special event service to selected sporting events. Park and ride facilities and the Auburn Station support bus and rail service. Level of Service (LOS) Washington's Growth Management Act (GMA) requires Level of Service (LOS) standards for both arterials and transit routes. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction's LOS standards be coordinated within the region and be supported by local ordinance, but the actual standards and the methods used are determined by each local jurisdiction. Under GMA, the focus is on the performance of the whole road system, not on individual intersections or roadways. LOS standards are a tool to help keep the transportation system in balance with the needs of forecast population growth and development. Table T-1a summarizes the LOS definitions. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 18 Table T-1a Definition of Urban Street Level of Service (LOS) LOS A - describes primarily free flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free flow speed for the given street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. LOS B - describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and stopped delays are not bothersome. LOS C - describes stable conditions; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the free flow speed for the street class. LOS D - borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or some combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free flow speed. LOS E - is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of 33 percent or less of the free flow speed. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing. LOS F - is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one-fourth of the free flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes and extensive queuing. Source: 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 2010, page 10-5 A methodology and set of standards have been drafted for the City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan. The standards help determine concurrency (i.e., balance) between the transportation and land use elements of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, as required by the GMA. The City has four choices if it is determined that standards cannot be met.  Modify the land use plan, placing tighter controls on the amount and type of development to reduce traffic.  Construct additional transportation facilities to support increased travel demand from new development.  Implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) measures to increase use of non- single occupant vehicle travel modes.  Relax the LOS standards; the City can lower its level of service standards to encourage further growth and minimize the need for additional transportation facilities. The transportation/land-use balance will be monitored through the City's Concurrency Management System as part of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Transportation concurrency will be evaluated for key facilities and on a system-wide basis. The City can then identify locations where standards are not anticipated to be met in the future and identify appropriate improvements. At the project level, the SEPA process will continue to guide the more specific planning and analysis efforts. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 19 Level of Service Standards LOS standards can help identify where and when transportation improvements are needed, and when development or growth will affect system operations. LOS provides a standard below which a transportation facility or system is not considered adequate. LOS standards can also be used to evaluate the impact of proposed developments on the surrounding street system. They can assure that all developments are served by a safe, efficient and cost-effective street system. They can also be used to disclose impacts, identify remedial actions, and apportion costs between public and private sources. The LOS standards shown in Table T-1b apply to the facility’s location and its functional classification. A more detailed description of the level of service methodology is provided in the City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan (2020), Chapter 5, Policy LOS-02. Table T- 1b Draft Roadway Capacity/Congestion LOS Standards Roadway/Intersection Maximum V/C Ratio/LOS Arterial Corridor D* Signalized Intersection D Unsignalized Intersection D *Unless otherwise specified in Chapter 2 of the City of Auburn Comprehensive Transportation Plan, 2020 LOS standards are also the basis of an equitable traffic impact fee system, which require developments to pay a portion of the costs for capacity improvements to the transportation infrastructure. In 2001, the City implemented a traffic impact fee program. The purpose of the fee is to mitigate traffic impacts more equitably while making the costs of development more predictable to developers. In 2007, the City implemented an additional transportation impact fee to address the impacts of heavy truck usage on the City’s transportation system. Both fees are updated annually so that the fees are consistent with current project costs. Measuring Transportation System Performance The level of service for street segments or links is analyzed with two primary purposes in mind. First, this site-specific LOS can be used, with the help of a travel demand model, to evaluate areas of congestion within a transportation network, leading to the development of a long-range transportation facilities plan. Second, arterial corridor LOS analysis can be used to assess concurrency or if facilities are meeting the LOS standards. The City of Auburn currently uses Highway Capacity Manual methodologies to calculate levels of service. For arterials LOS are based on average travel speeds along a defined corridor. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 20 Table T-1c shows the 25 defined street corridors, LOS standards and most recent calculated LOS. TABLE T- 1c Auburn Corridor Level of Service – Existing 2014 Weekday PM Peak Hour LOS ID Corridor From To Standard*NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St E C C 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE F C D 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr SE D B C 5 M St / Harvey Auburn Way N E Main St E D D 6 M St / Harvey E Main St Auburn Way S E D C 7 37th St NE / NW W Valley Hwy Auburn Way N E C C 8 15th St NE / NW W Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F**D D 9 Auburn Ave / A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D B C 10 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 11 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW E D D 12 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR - 18 D B C 13 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 14 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 15 R St SE / Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B B 16 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 17 A St NW / B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 18 8th St NE / Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 19 SE 312th St / 132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR - 18 D B B 20 105th Pl SE / SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D A C 21 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE E D C 22 29th St SE / Riverwalk Dr A St SE Auburn Way S D D C 23 3rd St SW / Cross St C St Auburn Way S F F E 24 41st St SE / Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE F F F 25 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D E * **Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet the LOS Standards Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. 2014 LOS City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 21 Concurrency (Adequate Public Facilities) Concurrency involves matching public facilities and new development. The GMA extends concurrency to transportation facilities by requiring that new development be served by adequate roads and public transportation service, and that development is not permitted to cause these transportation facilities to operate below level of service standards that are adopted by local governments in their comprehensive plans. In compliance with the GMA, adequate transportation system facilities must be available within six years of the time of occupancy and use of new development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s transportation facilities include projects totaling $68,863,053. Tables T-2, T-2A and T-2B show the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table T-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $312,900 are forecasted for transportation facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 22 TABLE T- 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – ARTERIAL STREET 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 27 Harvey Road & 8th Street NE Intersection Improvements Long-Term Debt 83,700 83,300 82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 83,700 83,300 82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 28 Lea Hill Road/112th Ave SE Roundabout Capital Costs - - - 350,000 420,000 2,200,000 2,970,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 350,000 420,000 1,100,000 1,870,000 29 29th Street SE & R Street SE Intersection Improvements Capital Costs 750,000 500,000 250,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 750,000 500,000 250,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 30 R Street SE & 21st Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements Capital Costs - - 250,000 100,000 750,000 - 1,100,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - 500,000 - 500,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 250,000 100,000 250,000 - 600,000 31 Auburn Way S and 6th Street SE Capital Costs - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 785,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - 505,000 505,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 130,000 25,000 125,000 280,000 32 SE 304th Street/132nd Avenue SE Roundabout Capital Costs - - 250,000 50,000 1,200,000 - 1,500,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 250,000 50,000 1,200,000 - 1,500,000 33 10th Street NW/A Street NW Intersection Improvements Capital Costs - 200,000 650,000 - - - 850,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 200,000 650,000 - - - 850,000 34 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Downtown to Les Gove) Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - 35 Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements, Phase 1 & 2 Capital Costs - - - - - 410,000 410,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 410,000 410,000 Other - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 23 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 36 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 950,000 - - - - 1,150,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 20,000 250,000 - - - - 270,000 Grants 180,000 450,000 - - - - 630,000 Other -MIT - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 37 Stewart Road - Sumner (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor) Capital Costs - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic MitigationFees - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 38 M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) Long-Term Debt 123,200 122,900 122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 123,200 122,900 122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 39 A Street Loop Capital Costs - 300,000 167,000 1,465,000 - - 1,932,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants (Unsecured)- - - 1,125,000 - - 1,125,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 300,000 167,000 - - - 467,000 Other - - - 340,000 - - 340,000 40 A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW) Capital Costs - - - 350,000 2,650,000 - 3,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 150,000 - - 150,000 Grants (Unsecured)- - - 200,000 1,325,000 - 1,525,000 Other (Other Agencies)- - - - 1,325,000 - 1,325,000 41 Auburn Way S Improvements (Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE) Capital Costs 1,500,000 750,000 5,580,120 2,800,000 - - 10,630,120 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 3,000,000 1,500,000 - - 4,500,000 Traffic Impact Fees 851,250 750,000 1,830,120 1,300,000 - - 4,731,370 Grants 648,750 - - - - - 648,750 Other (Other Agencies)- - 750,000 - - - 750,000 42 M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) Capital Costs - 375,000 50,000 2,485,000 - - 2,910,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 120,000 50,000 400,000 - - 570,000 Arterial Street Fund 105 - 185,000 - 1,220,000 - - 1,405,000 REET - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 70,000 - 465,000 - - 535,000 Other - - - - - - - 43 49th Street NE (Auburn Way N to D St NE) Capital Costs 500,000 1,500,000 - - - - 2,000,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Other 500,000 1,500,000 - - - - 2,000,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 24 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 44 46th Place S Realignment Capital Costs - - - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - 300,000 540,000 840,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 75,000 135,000 210,000 45 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements Phase 2 Capital Costs - - - - - 400,000 400,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 400,000 400,000 46 Regional Growth Center Access Improvements Capital Costs 410,000 100,000 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants 325,000 - 1,300,000 - - - 1,625,000 Traffic Impact Fees 85,000 100,000 200,000 - - - 385,000 47 Stewart Road - City of Pacific (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor) Capital Costs 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic MitigationFees 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 48 East Valley Highway Widening Capital Costs - - - - - 300,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - 200,000 200,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 100,000 100,000 49 Garden Avenue Realignment Capital Costs 150,000 500,000 - - - - 650,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 150,000 500,000 - - - - 650,000 50 A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) Capital Costs 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 25,000 25,000 - - - - 50,000 51 S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements Capital Costs 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Other - - - - - - - 52 A Street SE Corridor Study Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - - - Grants - - - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 3,861,900 5,406,200 8,902,464 11,584,640 5,623,955 4,818,262 40,197,421 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 25 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 53 Auburn Way N/1st Street NE Signal Replacement Capital Costs 575,000 - - - - - 575,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 525,000 - - - - - 525,000 Arterial Street Preservation 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 54 ITS Dynamic Message Signs Capital Costs - - - - - 20,000 20,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 20,000 20,000 Grants - - - - - - - 55 Auburn Avenue/E Main Street Signal Replacement Capital Costs - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Grants - - - - - - - 56 Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility & Safety Program Capital Costs 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Other - - - - - - - 57 Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Other - - - - - - - 58 Downtown Transit Center Access Improvements Capital Costs - 125,000 - - - - 125,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - 25,000 - - - - 25,000 Other (Sound Transit)- 100,000 - - - - 100,000 59 M Street SE Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs 669,980 - - - - - 669,980 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Grants (Unsecured)419,980 - - - - - 419,980 Other - - - - - - - 60 Auburn Way S (SR-164) Poplar Curve Safety Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grants (Unsecured)- - - - - - - Other - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,424,980 245,000 220,000 120,000 220,000 290,000 2,519,980 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 26 TABLE T- 2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 3,655,000 5,200,000 8,697,120 11,380,000 5,420,000 4,615,000 38,967,120 Non-Capacity Projects 1,424,980 245,000 220,000 120,000 220,000 290,000 2,519,980 Long-Term Debt 206,900 206,200 205,344 204,640 203,955 203,262 1,230,301 Total Costs 5,286,880 5,651,200 9,122,464 11,704,640 5,843,955 5,108,262 42,717,401 FUNDING SOURCES: Unrestricted Street Revenue 965,000 495,000 3,250,000 2,000,000 200,000 680,000 7,590,000 Grants 1,573,730 450,000 1,300,000 1,325,000 2,125,000 2,345,000 9,118,730 Traffic Impact Fees 2,098,150 2,671,200 3,822,464 6,269,640 2,193,955 2,083,262 19,138,671 Traffic Mitigation Fees 100,000 - - 150,000 - - 250,000 Arterial Street Fund 105 50,000 185,000 - 1,220,000 - - 1,455,000 REET - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 Other (Other Agencies)500,000 1,850,000 750,000 340,000 1,325,000 - 4,765,000 Total Funding 5,286,880 5,651,200 9,122,464 11,704,640 5,843,955 5,108,262 42,717,401 * Mitigation agreements, impact fees, contributions, other agencies, other funds City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 27 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Harvey Rd NE/8th St NE Intersection Improvements TIP# I-5 Project No:cp0611 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:None LOS Corridor ID# 5, 19 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)861,178 84,000 83,700 83,300 1,028,878 Traffic Impact Fees 204,500 204,500 PWTF 1,527,300 1,527,300 2,592,978 84,000 83,700 83,300 2,760,678 Capital Expenditures: Design 327,500 - - - 327,500 Right of Way 200,400 - - - 200,400 Construction 1,203,900 - - - 1,203,900 Long Term Debt - PWTF 861,178 84,000 83,700 83,300 1,028,878 2,592,978 84,000 83,700 83,300 2,760,678 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - PWTF - - - - - 82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long Term Debt - PWTF 82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 82,794 82,382 81,990 81,589 495,755 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Description: The project constructed one eastbound through/right turn-lane on 8th St NE to the west of Harvey Rd and modified traffic signals and traffic channelization to accommodate the new lane. The additional lane reduced traffic delays and queuing at the intersection of Harvey Rd and 8th St NE in all directions. This project also reconstructed M St NE from 4th St NE to 8th St NE, a segment of roadway approximately 0.3 miles long with a four-lane cross-section. The reconstruction addressed the existing poor pavement condition and completed sidewalk gaps. . Progress Summary: Project was completed in 2010. Ongoing budget is for Public Works Trust Fund Loan debt payments scheduled through 2028. Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 28 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Road/112th Ave SE Roundabout TIP# I-6 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - 1,100,000 1,100,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 350,000 420,000 1,100,000 1,870,000 Other - - - - - - 350,000 420,000 2,200,000 2,970,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 350,000 - - 350,000 Right of Way - - 420,000 - 420,000 Construction - - - 2,200,000 2,200,000 - 350,000 420,000 2,200,000 2,970,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will construct a single-lane roundabout at the 112th Avenue SE intersection with Lea Hill Road. The intersection is currently stop-controlled on the 112th Avenue SE approach. The project will also implement turn restrictions at the Lea Hill Road intersection with 105th Place SE, and remove the existing span wire traffic signal. The project will improve traffic operations, safety and non-motorized access. Progress Summary: The Lea Hill Road Corridor study was completed during 2020. This project is based on the study recommendations. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 29 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 29th St SE/R St SE Intersection Improvements TIP# I-8 Project No:asbd30 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 16, 27 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 750,000 500,000 750,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 750,000 500,000 750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 750,000 250,000 - Right of Way - - - 250,000 - Construction - - - - - - 750,000 500,000 750,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 250,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 1,000,000 Right of Way 250,000 - - - 500,000 Construction - 3,500,000 - - 3,500,000 250,000 3,500,000 - - 5,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will construct a second southbound through lane between 22nd Street SE and 33rd Street SE and a new signal at the 29th Street SE intersection. The improvements are needed to address the existing LOS deficiency at this intersection during the weekday PM peak hour. Progress Summary: The R Street Corridor study was completed during 2020. This project is based on the study recommendations. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The additional annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Replacing the traffic signal will reduce on- going maintenance costs to replace parts and equipment that have reached the end of their service life. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 30 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: R Street SE & 21st Street SE Intersection Safety Improvements TIP# I-10 Project No:CP1918 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:James Webb LOS Corridor ID# 16 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - 500,000 - 500,000 Traffic Impact Fees 250,000 100,000 250,000 - 600,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 100,000 750,000 - 1,100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way - 100,000 - - 100,000 Construction - - 750,000 - 750,000 250,000 100,000 750,000 - 1,100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct a single lane roundabout in place of the existing east/west stop-control on 21st Street SE. The project is needed to address an existing LOS deficiency, and will improve safety at the intersection. Progress Summary: This improvement was recommended in the R Street Corridor study which was completed during 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 31 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way S and 6th Street SE TIP# I-11 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 3 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - 505,000 505,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 130,000 25,000 125,000 280,000 Other - - - - - - 130,000 25,000 630,000 785,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 130,000 - - 130,000 Right of Way - - 25,000 - 25,000 Construction - - - 630,000 630,000 - 130,000 25,000 630,000 785,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will construct a dedicated southbound right-turn pocket on Auburn Way S at 6th Street SE. The project will address an existing level of service deficiency at the intersection. Progress Summary: Federal grant funding for construction is proposed to be applied for in 2022. If awarded construction would occur in 2025. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 32 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: SE 304th Street/132nd Avenue SE Roundabout TIP# I-13 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23, 25 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 250,000 50,000 1,200,000 - 1,500,000 Other - - - - - 250,000 50,000 1,200,000 - 1,500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 250,000 - - - 250,000 Right of Way - 50,000 - - 50,000 Construction - - 1,200,000 - 1,200,000 250,000 50,000 1,200,000 - 1,500,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will construct a single-lane roundabout at the SE 304th Street intersection with 132nd Avenue SE on Lea Hill. The roundabout will replace the existing stop-controlled on the SE 304th Street approach. The project is needed to address a level of service deficiency at the intersection. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 33 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 10th Street NW/A Street NW Intersection Improvements TIP# I-15 Project No:asbd36 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 200,000 200,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 200,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 200,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 200,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 650,000 - - - 850,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 650,000 - - - 850,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 650,000 - - - 650,000 650,000 - - - 850,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct a new traffic signal in place of the existing stop-control on the 10th Street NW approach. The project is needed to address a level of service deficiency at the intersection. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 34 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements (Downtown to Les Gove) TIP# N-5 Project No:cp1416 Project Type:Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2017 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 40,000 359,000 10,000 - 409,000 Grants- Secured Federal 494,770 2,025,230 - - 2,520,000 Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 160,583 538,584 - - 699,167 Other - - - - - 695,353 2,922,814 10,000 - 3,628,167 Capital Expenditures: Design 653,373 2,921,273 - - 3,574,646 Right of Way 41,980 1,541 - - 43,521 Construction - - 10,000 - 10,000 695,353 2,922,814 10,000 - 3,628,167 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed)- - - - - Grants-Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The F St SE project includes pavement rehabilitation, installation of curbs, gutters, bike lanes, sidewalks, ADA improvements, utility undergrounding, LED street lighting, wayfinding signage and a "Bicycle Boulevard" designation of roadway connections between Auburn City Hall and the Les Gove Park Campus. This project improves mobility and safety along the corridor and will complete a gap in the non-motorized network between Auburn's Downtown and the Les Gove Community Campus. The major infrastructure improvements are approximately 0.3 miles long and the "Bicycle Boulevard" improvements are just over a mile long. Progress Summary: Preliminary design and survey work was completed in 2009. Federal Grant was secured in 2014 for design and ROW phases. Design phase was initiated in 2015. Construction grant secured in 2018. Project construction is underway in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are a placeholder for a potential 2020 project budget carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $4,100. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 35 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Evergreen Heights Safe Routes to School Improvements, Phase 1 & 2 TIP# N-8 Project No:asbd14, cp1810 Project Type:Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:Jacob Sweeting LOS Corridor ID# 37 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 24,500 - - - 24,500 Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Mitigation Fees 100,000 - - - 100,000 Other (Auburn Sch. Dist.)122,500 - - - 122,500 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - 247,000 - - - 247,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 247,000 - - - 247,000 247,000 - - - 247,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 410,000 410,000 Grants- Unsecured - - - - - Mitigation Fees - - - - - Other (Auburn Sch. Dist.)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - - 410,000 410,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 200,000 200,000 Right of Way - - - 210,000 210,000 Construction - - - - - - - - 410,000 410,000 Grants / Other Sources: Auburn School District partnership includes direct financial contribution and ROW dedication. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: Phase 1 of the project included the vertical realignment of S 316th Street along the school frontage to address a sight- distance problem associated with the school driveways and at the intersection with 56th Avenue S. This improvement was constructed by the school district as part of their half street improvements associated with on-site improvements to the school. Phase 2 of the project will realign the 56th Avenue S approach to S 316th Street to the east to remove the offset between the street approach and school driveway, and a roundabout will be constructed at the S 316th Street/56th Avenue S intersection replacing the existing all-way stop-control. Other project elements include street lighting and required storm water system improvements. Progress Summary: A partnership with the Auburn School District was created for the Phase 1 improvements, which were completed in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 36 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements TIP# N-9 Project No:asbd26 Project Type:Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 27 Previous Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - 20,000 250,000 20,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - 180,000 450,000 180,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - 250,000 - - - 200,000 950,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 200,000 - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 950,000 - - - 200,000 950,000 200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 270,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 630,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - - 250,000 - - - - 1,150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 200,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 950,000 - - - - 1,150,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct sidewalks, street lighting, and related storm improvements along the east side of Riverwalk Drive SE between Auburn Way S and Howard Road SE. This project will close a major gap in the sidewalk system and ties into the proposed improvements on Auburn Way South. The project will also install a RRFB at the intersection with Howard Road. The project is proposed to be in partnership with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. Progress Summary: Grant funding was applied for in 2020. If awarded, design will begin in 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 37 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Stewart Road - Sumner (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor)TIP# R-2 Project No:N/A Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:City of Sumner LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - 150,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 150,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 - - 150,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This is a City of Sumner project to widen the Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor. The project will replace the existing bridge over the White River with a new wider one. Completion of this corridor widening is expected to significantly relieve traffic congestion in Auburn along the A St SE and C St SW corridors. Progress Summary: City of Sumner has initiated preliminary road design and is seeking grant funding to complete the project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 38 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street Underpass (3rd St SE to 8th St SE) TIP# R-3 Project No:c201a0 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Ryan Vondrak LOS Corridor ID# 6 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)9,696,313 - - - 9,696,313 REET2 1,140,001 - - - 1,140,001 Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)4,162,000 - - - 4,162,000 Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)767,428 123,428 123,200 122,900 1,014,056 Traffic Mitigation Fees 660,000 - - - 660,000 PWTFL (30 years)3,284,857 - - - 3,284,857 Other Sources (Other Agencies)*3,126,104 - - - 3,126,104 22,836,703 123,428 123,200 122,900 23,083,331 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,688,924 - - - 2,688,924 Right of Way 3,358,443 - - - 3,358,443 Construction 16,021,908 - - - 16,021,908 PWTFL Debt Service 767,428 123,428 123,200 122,900 1,014,056 22,836,703 123,428 123,200 122,900 23,083,331 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Construction)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees (Debt Service)122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - - PWTFL (30 years)- - - - - Other Sources (Other Agencies)*- - - - - 122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - PWTFL Debt Service 122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 122,550 122,258 121,965 121,673 734,546 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Grants / Other Sources: Other Agencies are King County Metro Sewer, Port of Seattle, Port of Tacoma, and BNSF Railway Description: Construction of a grade separated railroad crossing of M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks. Progress Summary: Construction was completed in 2014. Debt Service is scheduled each year through 2041. Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 39 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street Loop TIP# R-4 Project No:asbd32 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Unsecured Grant - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 300,000 - Other (Sound Transit)- - - - - - - 300,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 300,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 300,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Unsecured Grant - 1,125,000 - - 1,125,000 Traffic Impact Fees 167,000 - - - 467,000 Other (Sound Transit)340,000 - - 340,000 167,000 1,465,000 - - 1,932,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 300,000 Right of Way 167,000 - - - 167,000 Construction - 1,465,000 - - 1,465,000 167,000 1,465,000 - - 1,932,000 Grants / Other Sources:Interlocal funding from Sound Transit Total Funding Sources: Description: The project will construct a new one-way (eastbound) roadway connection between A Street SW/S Division Street and A Street SE. The new intersection with A Street SE will allow an unsignalized right-turn movement onto southbound A Street SE, providing an alternative to the intersection of 3rd Street SE and A Street SE, which does not meet adopted LOS standards. The roadway will be constructed as a complete street to accommodate non-motorized road users. Progress Summary: Sound Transit has provided $340,000 towards the construction phase as mitigation for the second parking garage. Grant applications for both state and federal funding have been submitted in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 40 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW) TIP# R-5 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 18 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Unsecured Grant - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Unsecured Grant - 200,000 1,325,000 - 1,525,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 150,000 - - 150,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - 1,325,000 1,325,000 - 350,000 2,650,000 - 3,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 250,000 - - 250,000 Right of Way - 100,000 - - 100,000 Construction - - 2,650,000 - 2,650,000 - 350,000 2,650,000 - 3,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will widen A Street NW to create a three-lane roadway section between W Main St and 3rd St NW. This project will improve the connection between the A St NW Extension, (Phase 1) and Auburn Station and Central Business District. This project could be partially or fully funded by development and/or Sound Transit's parking garage/access improvements. The project is approximately 0.2 miles long. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 41 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way S Improvements (Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE)TIP# R-6 Project No:cp1622 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Bender LOS Corridor ID# 4 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - Grants- Secured (Federal)13,025 635,725 648,750 - 1,297,500 Traffic Impact Fees 6,246 95,004 851,250 750,000 952,500 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 19,271 730,729 1,500,000 750,000 2,250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 750,000 750,000 - 1,500,000 Right of Way - - 750,000 750,000 750,000 Construction - - - - - 750,000 1,500,000 750,000 2,250,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 3,000,000 1,500,000 - - 4,500,000 Grants- Secured (Federal)- - - - 648,750 Traffic Impact Fees 1,830,120 1,300,000 - - 4,731,370 REET2 - - - - - Other 750,000 - - 750,000 5,580,120 2,800,000 - - 10,630,120 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 750,000 Right of Way - - - - 1,500,000 Construction 5,580,120 2,800,000 - - 8,380,120 5,580,120 2,800,000 - - 10,630,120 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: 851250 Progress Summary: The project will extend corridor improvements along Auburn Way S recently completed under previous projects. Grant funding for the design phase was awarded in 2019. Grant funding for the construction phase was applied for in 2020. Coordination with the Auburn School District related to the replacement of Chinook Elementary School is in progress. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 42 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street NE (E Main St to 4th St NE) TIP# R-7 Project No:asbd12 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 5 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 120,000 - Arterial Street Fund (105)- - - 185,000 - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 70,000 - Other - - - - - - - - 375,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 375,000 375,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 375,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 50,000 400,000 - - 570,000 Arterial Street Fund (105)- 1,220,000 - - 1,405,000 REET - 400,000 - - 400,000 Traffic Impact Fees - 465,000 - - 535,000 Other - - - - - 50,000 2,485,000 - - 2,910,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 375,000 Right of Way 50,000 - - - 50,000 Construction - 2,485,000 - - 2,485,000 50,000 2,485,000 - - 2,910,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will construct a complete four/five-lane street section on M St NE from south of E Main St to 4th St NE, and reconstruct the signal at E Main St. The project is needed to improve traffic operations along the M Street NE corridor, and replace the existing pavement which is in poor condition. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 43 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 49th Street NE (Auburn Way N to D St NE)TIP # R-8 Project No:asbd38 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - Developer - - 500,000 1,500,000 500,000 - - 500,000 1,500,000 500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 350,000 - 350,000 Right of Way - - 150,000 - 150,000 Construction - - - 1,500,000 - - - 500,000 1,500,000 500,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - Developer - - - - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 350,000 Right of Way - - - - 150,000 Construction - - - - 1,500,000 - - - - 2,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will construct the build-out of 49th Street NE between Auburn Way N and D Street NE. The improvements are funded by private development. Progress Summary: Conceptual design and development agreement for funding underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 44 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 46th Place S Realignment TIP# R-9 Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured - - 300,000 540,000 840,000 REET 2 - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - 75,000 135,000 210,000 Other Sources - - - - - - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 125,000 - 125,000 Right of Way - - 250,000 - 250,000 Construction - - - 675,000 675,000 - - 375,000 675,000 1,050,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The project will realign 46th Place S to the south of S 321st Street. The realignment will move the 46th Place S intersection with S 321st Street approximately 350 feet to the east of the current location. This will create two T-intersections (44th Avenue S and 46th Place S) in place of the existing four-leg intersection. The existing 46th Place S will be dead-ended to the south of S 321st Street. The project will improve safety and traffic operations at the intersections. Progress Summary: A portion of the right-of-way for the realigned roadway was dedicated as part of an adjacent development project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 45 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 124th Ave SE Corridor Improvements (SE 312th to SE 318th)TIP# R-11 Project No:asbd01 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 23 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - 400,000 400,000 Other - - - - - - - - 400,000 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 400,000 400,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 400,000 400,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: This project will widen 124th Avenue SE to create a four-lane section with bicycle and pedestrian facilities SE 318th St and SE 312th St. The project will also construct improvements at the SE 312th St/124th Ave SE intersection (including adding bike lanes, dual westbound left-turn lanes, dual southbound through-lanes, a northbound right-turn pocket, ITS improvements, and pedestrian safety improvements). The project is needed to improve traffic operations along the corridor and to accommodate all travel modes. Progress Summary: Phase 1 improvements between SE 318th and SE 316th were completed by GRC in 2012. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 46 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Regional Growth Center Access Improvements TIP# R-16 Project No:asbd24 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured - - 325,000 - 325,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - 85,000 100,000 85,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 410,000 100,000 410,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 410,000 - 410,000 Right of Way - - - 100,000 - Construction - - - - - - - 410,000 100,000 410,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured 1,300,000 - - - 1,625,000 Traffic Impact Fees 200,000 - - - 385,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 410,000 Right of Way - - - - 100,000 Construction 1,500,000 - - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 - - - 2,010,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct a northbound left-turn lane and a northbound/southbound crosswalk at the 3rd Street NE/Auburn Avenue intersection, and realign the 4th Street NE/Auburn Way N intersection to eliminate the split phase signal operation improving circulation and access. The project will improve traffic operations, safety, and circulation for both vehicles and non-motorized users. Progress Summary: Grant funding for the design and construction phases was awarded from Sound Transit in 2019. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 47 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Stewart Road - City of Pacific (Lake Tapps Parkway Corridor)TIP# R-24 Project No:asbd25 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:City of Pacific LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 100,000 - 100,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Traffic Mitigation Fees - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This is a City of Pacific project to widen the Stewart Road (Lake Tapps Parkway) Corridor. This is the final segment of widening in the City of Pacific which will tie in with the City of Sumner's planned final widening segment and new bridge over the White River. Completion of this corridor widening is expected to significantly relieve traffic congestion in Auburn along the A St SE and C St SW corridors. Progress Summary: City of Pacific is in the process of completing the design phase and environmental permitting for the project. Construction is currently planned for 2021/22. Future Impact on Operating Budget: There is no future impact to Auburn's operating budgets. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 48 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: East Valley Highway Widening TIP # R-26 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Unsecured Grant - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Unsecured Grant - - - 200,000 200,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - 100,000 100,000 - - - - 300,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 300,000 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 300,000 300,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will widen E Valley Highway between Lakeland Hills Way and Terrace View Drive SE, approximately 0.6 miles. The roadway will have a four/five lane cross section with a trail connection along the east side. Other project elements include storm improvement, illumination and ITS. The project will provide congestion relief along the corridor and provide access for non-motorized users. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $2,500. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 49 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Garden Avenue Realignment TIP # R-27 Project No:cp2022 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 19 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 150,000 150,000 500,000 300,000 - 150,000 150,000 500,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 150,000 - - 150,000 Right of Way - - 150,000 - 150,000 Construction - - - 500,000 - - 150,000 150,000 500,000 300,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 650,000 - - - - 650,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - 150,000 Construction - - - - 500,000 - - - - 650,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will construct a new east/west connection between Garden Avenue and 104th Avenue SE, and will cul-de-sac Garden Avenue to the north of 8th Street NE. This will improve traffic operations and safety along 8th Street NE. Progress Summary: The previous project title (Lea Hill Rd Segment 1A) was updated based on recommendations of the Lea Hill Corridor Study in 2020. In 2016, a parcel at the intersection of Garden Avenue and 320th/8th Street was purchased for the project. In 2016, right-of-way was dedicated for a portion of the new east/west roadway as part of an adjacent development project. Additional property acquisition underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost for this project is estimated to be $1,000. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 50 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street NW - Phase 1 (3rd St NW to 14th St NW) TIP# S-1 Project No:c207a0 Project Type:Capacity, Environmental Monitoring Project Manager:Tim Carlaw LOS Corridor ID# 18 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 123,276 - - - 123,276 Grants- Secured (Fed,State)6,562,702 - - - 6,562,702 Traffic Impact Fees 1,288,115 25,000 25,000 25,000 1,338,115 Other Sources -Multicare Contribution 383,381 - - - 383,381 8,357,474 25,000 25,000 25,000 8,407,474 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,247,331 - - - 2,247,331 Right of Way 821,341 - - - 821,341 Construction 5,000,640 - - - 5,000,640 Environmental 288,162 25,000 25,000 25,000 338,162 8,357,474 25,000 25,000 25,000 8,407,474 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 50,000 Other Sources -Multicare Contribution - - - - - - - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - Environmental - - - - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project constructed a new multi-lane arterial from 3rd Street NW to 14th Street NW completing a missing link along the corridor. This project improves mobility and was tied to corridor development. The project length was approximately three- quarters of a mile. The City purchased ROW from the northern property owner. If the property develops any access to A St NW, some or a portion of those funds may be reimbursed to the City (total cost was $251,000). Progress Summary: Pre-design was completed prior to 2007. Final design and environmental permitting were completed in 2011 and construction was completed in 2013. Major plantings are scheduled in 2015 as part of the wetland monitoring that is required to continue until 2023. Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 51 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: S 272nd/277th St Corridor Capacity & Non-Motorized Trail Improvements TIP# S-2 Project No:cp1821 Project Type:Capacity, Environmental Monitoring Project Manager:Tim Carlaw LOS Corridor ID# 15 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured Federal - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 16,027 20,000 20,000 20,000 56,027 Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - Other - - - - - 16,027 20,000 20,000 20,000 56,027 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Environmental 16,027 20,000 20,000 20,000 56,027 Construction - - - - - 16,027 20,000 20,000 20,000 56,027 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured State - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Other (Development Funds)*- - - - - Other - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Environmental 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Construction - - - - - 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 120,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will complete the environmental monitoring requirements related to the S 277th St corridor widening project between Auburn Way North and l St NE. Progress Summary: The 10 year monitoring period began in 2018 after final completion and continue through 2028. Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 52 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A Street SE Corridor Study TIP# S-3 Project No:CP1110 Project Type:Capacity, Safety Project Manager:James Webb LOS Corridor ID# 10, 34 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 1,230 - - 1,230 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - 105,000 10,000 - 115,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,230 105,000 10,000 - 116,230 Capital Expenditures: Design 1,230 105,000 10,000 - 116,230 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 1,230 105,000 10,000 - 116,230 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - 10,000 REET2 - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: Study the A Street SE corridor between 6th Street SE and Lakeland Hills Way SE, including 41st Street SE from D Street SE to C Street SW. The study will review safety, access, and traffic operations. Progress Summary: The study is underway in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are a placeholder for a potential 2020 project budget carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 53 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N/1st Street NE Signal Replacement TIP# I-1 Project No:CP1927 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Matt Larson LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 11,513 200,000 525,000 - 736,513 Arterial Preservation Fund (105)- - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - 11,513 200,000 575,000 - 786,513 Capital Expenditures: Design 11,513 150,000 - - 161,513 Right of Way - 50,000 - - 50,000 Construction - - 575,000 - 575,000 11,513 200,000 575,000 - 786,513 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 525,000 Arterial Preservation Fund (105)- - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - 525,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 575,000 - - - - 575,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will replace the existing traffic signal at the Auburn Way N/1st Street NE signal. The signal was constructed in 1968 and is approaching the end of its service life. The project scope also includes the construction of ADA improvements, curb-bulbs, and storm improvements. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Replacing the traffic signal will reduce on-going maintenance costs to replace parts and equipment that have reached the end of their service life. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 54 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: ITS Dynamic Message Signs TIP# I-3 Project No:asbd16, cp1701, cp1912 Project Type:Non-Capacity (ITS) Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 224,320 125,000 - 349,320 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET 97,500 - - - 97,500 PWTFL - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - - - 321,820 125,000 - - 446,820 Capital Expenditures: Design 32,500 - - - 32,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 289,320 125,000 - - 414,320 321,820 125,000 - - 446,820 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 20,000 20,000 Grants- Unsecured Federal - - - - - REET - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Other (MIT)- - - - - - - - 20,000 20,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 20,000 20,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 20,000 20,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The program constructs Dynamic Message Signs at various locations throughout the City. Dynamic message signs are an important tool for communicating with roadway users in real time. Priority locations for sign placement are based on the Comprehensive Transportation Plans ITS map and include S. 277th, Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, W Valley Highway, E Valley Highway, Lake Tapps Parkway, 15th St NW, and Lea Hill Rd. Progress Summary: The first two signs (Auburn Way S and S 277th Street) have been completed. The sign on 15th Street NW is currently in design and will be constructed during 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance and operational costs for this project is estimated to be $750 per sign. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 55 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Avenue/E Main Street Signal Replacement TIP# I-7 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 150,000 150,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed & State)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other Sources - - - - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 150,000 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 150,000 150,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This program will replace the existing traffic signal at the Auburn Avenue/E Main Street signal, which was constructed in 1968. The project scope also includes the construction of ADA improvements. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Replacing the traffic signal will reduce on-going maintenance costs to replace parts and equipment that have reached the end of their service life. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 56 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Pedestrian Accessibility and Safety Program TIP# N-1 Project No:asbd08, cp1816, cp1804, cp1902 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:James Webb LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: Previous 2 Years 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 73,030 225,084 50,000 100,000 348,114 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 73,030 225,084 50,000 100,000 348,114 Capital Expenditures: Design 65,139 20,000 5,000 10,000 90,139 Right of Way - - Construction 7,891 205,084 45,000 90,000 257,975 73,030 225,084 50,000 100,000 348,114 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 55,000 Right of Way - Construction 90,000 90,000 90,000 90,000 495,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 550,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The program will construct small pedestrian improvement projects at locations throughout the City. Projects are prioritized annually based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies, and citizen requests. Program funds reflect remaining budget after allocations to specific pedestrian accessibility and safety projects. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 57 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Citywide Arterial Bicycle & Safety Improvements TIP# N-3 Project No:asbd07, cp1910 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Safety) Project Manager:Various LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 4,188 - 100,000 - 104,188 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 4,188 - 100,000 - 104,188 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 4,188 - 90,000 - 94,188 4,188 - 100,000 - 104,188 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 10,000 - 10,000 - 30,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 90,000 - 90,000 - 270,000 100,000 - 100,000 - 300,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: The program will construct bicycle and safety improvements on classified roadways throughout the City. Projects are prioritized bi-annually based upon field studies and community feedback. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 58 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Downtown Transit Center Access Improvements TIP# N-6 Project No:asbd28 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Transit Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - 25,000 - Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (King County Metro)- - - 100,000 - - - - 125,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 15,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 110,000 - - - - 125,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 25,000 Grants- Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - REET2 - - - - - Other (King County Metro)- - - - 100,000 - - - - 125,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 110,000 - - - - 125,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will reconstruct the channelization and curb radii to improve the turning radius for transit vehicles at the northeast corner of A St SW/2nd St SW. Progress Summary: The ROW needed to accommodate this improvement was dedicated by the adjacent development project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 59 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: M Street SE Sidewalk Improvements TIP# N-10 Project No:CP2012 Project Type: Non-Capacity, Non-Motorized Project Manager:Luis Barba LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue - 14,980 250,000 - 264,980 Secured Grant - 30,020 419,980 - 450,000 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - 45,000 669,980 - 714,980 Capital Expenditures: Design - 45,000 - - 45,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 669,980 - 669,980 - 45,000 669,980 - 714,980 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 250,000 Secured Grant - - - - 419,980 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 669,980 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 669,980 - - - - 669,980 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct sidewalks along the M Street SE corridor between Auburn Way S and 8th Street SE. The project will complete the missing sections of sidewalk along the west side of M Street SE between Auburn Way S and 8th Street SE, and will complete the missing segments of sidewalk along the east side between Auburn Way S and 12th Street SE. The project will construct approximately 2,000 linear feet of new sidewalk to match adjacent widths. The project will also construct ADA compliant curb ramps and relocate existing utility poles and overhead signage to provide ADA access. Progress Summary: Grant funding for the project was awarded by TIB in 2019. The design phase was initiated in 2020 and construction anticipated to be completed during 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 60 ARTERIAL STREET FUND (102)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way S (SR-164) Poplar Curve Safety Improvements TIP# R-15 Project No:cp1901 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Safety Project Manager:Jeff Bender LOS Corridor ID# 4 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Street Revenue 5,500 - 10,000 - 15,500 Secured State Grant 24,654 238,046 - 262,700 Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - 30,154 238,046 10,000 - 278,200 Capital Expenditures: Design 30,154 33,303 - - 63,457 Right of Way - 204,743 - - 204,743 Construction - - 10,000 10,000 30,154 238,046 10,000 - 278,200 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Street Revenue - - - - 10,000 Secured State Grant - - - - - Traffic Impact Fees - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will complete design and construct safety improvements at the curve along Auburn Way S in the vicinity of the intersection with Poplar Street. The improvements would include, illumination, electronic curve ahead warning signage, a high-friction surface treatment for the pavement, guardrail and driveway improvements. Progress Summary: Grant funding was awarded in 2018 that allowed design to start in 2019 with construction in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are for anticipated carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 61 TABLE T- 2A CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – LOCAL STREET 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Capacity Projects: None - Page # Non-Capacity Projects: 62 Local Street Improvement Program Capital Costs - 150,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 6,750,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)- 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 To Be Determined - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 6,000,000 Other REET 2 - - - - - - - 63 2021 Local Street Preservation Project Capital Costs 2,200,000 - - - - - 2,200,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)- - - - - - - Other REET 1 1,500,000 - - - - - 1,500,000 Other REET 2 700,000 - - - - - 700,000 64 2022 Local Street Preservation Project Capital Costs 150,000 1,500,000 - - - - 1,650,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Other REET 1 - 750,000 - - - - 750,000 Other REET 2 - 750,000 - - - - 750,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 2,350,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,600,000 Total Costs 2,350,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,600,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Transfer In (W/S/SWM Utility)150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 900,000 To Be Determined - - 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 6,000,000 Other REET 1 1,500,000 750,000 - - - - 2,250,000 Other REET 2 700,000 750,000 - - - - 1,450,000 Total Funding 2,350,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 10,600,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 62 LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Local Street Improvement Program TIP# P-2 Project No:sobd02, cp1614, cp1717, cp1725, cp1726, cp1925 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kenneth Clark LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Local Street Fund - 650,000 - - 650,000 Transfer In (Utilities)300,000 150,000 - 150,000 450,000 Sales Tax on Construction 2,644,476 - - - 2,644,476 To Be Determined - - - - - REET 1 - - - - - REET 2 1,750,000 1,050,000 - - 2,800,000 4,694,476 1,850,000 - 150,000 6,544,476 Capital Expenditures: Design 339,818 525,000 - 150,000 864,818 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 4,354,658 1,325,000 - - 5,679,658 4,694,476 1,850,000 - 150,000 6,544,476 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Local Street Fund - - - - - Transfer In (Utilities)150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 750,000 Sales Tax on Construction - - - - - To Be Determined 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 6,000,000 REET 1 - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 6,750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 2,150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,150,000 1,150,000 1,150,000 1,150,000 4,600,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 1,650,000 6,750,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The program preserves local (unclassified) streets. Individual projects may include crack sealing, asphalt patching, pre- leveling, asphalt overlays and roadway reconstruction. The program also funds the biennial collection of pavement condition ratings, conducted in even numbered years. Beginning in 2019 REET funding was dedicated by council to this program. Beyond 2022, funding for this program is shown as other because a dedicated funding source has not yet been identified, and the use of REET to fund the program is not sustainable in the long-term. Program funds reflect remaining budget after allocations to specific arterial street preservation projects which are included as separate projects. Progress Summary: This program has successfully completed overlays, chip seals and complete reconstructions since 2005. The program will focus on completing reconstruction needs in addition to regular maintenance treatments. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 63 LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 2021 Local Street Preservation Project TIP# P-7 Project No:cp2019 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kim Truong LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Local Street Fund - - - - - Transfer In (Utilities)- - - - - Sales Tax on Construction - - - - - REET 1 - - 1,500,000 - 1,500,000 REET 2 - - 700,000 - 700,000 - - 2,200,000 - 2,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 2,200,000 - 2,200,000 - - 2,200,000 - 2,200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Local Street Fund - - - - - Transfer In (Utilities)- - - - - Sales Tax on Construction - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 1,500,000 REET 2 - - - - 700,000 - - - - 2,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,200,000 - - - - 2,200,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will reconstruct G Street SE (from East Main Street to 4th Street SE) and grind and overlay the Riverwalk/Forest Ridge Neighborhood. The scope of work includes the following: full-depth roadway replacement and/or grind and overlay and any needed utility improvements within the project limits. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. REET funds shown include $700k carry forward of 2020 funds from project CP1925 - 2020 Local Street Preservation Project and $1.5M of new REET funding in 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 64 LOCAL STREET FUND (103)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: 2022 Local Street Preservation Project TIP# P-8 Project No:cp2101 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Local Street Fund - - - - - Transfer In (Utilities)- - 150,000 - 150,000 Sales Tax on Construction - - - - - REET 1 - - - 750,000 - REET 2 - - - 750,000 - - - 150,000 1,500,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 150,000 - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,500,000 - - - 150,000 1,500,000 150,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Local Street Fund - - - - - Transfer In (Utilities)- - - - 150,000 Sales Tax on Construction - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 750,000 REET 2 - - - - 750,000 - - - - 1,650,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,500,000 - - - - 1,650,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will reconstruct I Street SE (from East Main Street to 4th Street SE). The scope of work includes the following: full-depth roadway replacement and any needed utility improvements within the project limits. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 65 TABLE T- 2B CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING TRANSPORTATION – STREET PRESERVATION 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Capacity Projects: None - Page Non-Capacity Projects: 67 Arterial Street Preservation Program Capital Costs 327,500 1,650,000 606,728 599,514 2,100,000 2,200,000 7,483,742 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 327,500 1,650,000 606,728 599,514 2,100,000 2,200,000 7,483,742 REET 2 -Streets - - - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - - - 68 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE) Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grants - - - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - - - 69 Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (4th St SE to 8th St NE ) Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grants - - - - - - - 70 2nd Street SE Preservation Capital Costs 868,750 - - - - - 868,750 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 347,500 - - - - - 347,500 Grants 521,250 - - - - - 521,250 71 Lake Tapps Pkwy/Sumner-Tapps Hwy E Preservation Capital Costs - 25,000 75,000 1,284,356 - - 1,384,356 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - 25,000 75,000 534,356 - - 634,356 Grants - - - 750,000 - - 750,000 72 Lea Hill Bridge Deck Preservation Capital Costs 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 73 A St SE Preservation (37th Street SE to Lakeland Hills Way) Capital Costs - 25,000 100,000 1,732,260 - - 1,857,260 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - 25,000 100,000 866,130 - - 991,130 Grants - - - 866,130 - - 866,130 74 C Street SW Preservation (W Main St to GSA Signal) Capital Costs 25,000 100,000 2,236,544 - - - 2,361,544 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 25,000 100,000 1,118,272 - - - 1,243,272 Grants - - 1,118,272 - - - 1,118,272 75 Lakeland Hill Way Preservation (57th Drive SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy) Capital Costs 1,350,000 - - - - - 1,350,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 1,350,000 - - - - - 1,350,000 Grants - - - - - - - 76 3rd Street SW Bridges Deck Preservation Capital Costs 120,000 - - - - - 120,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants 120,000 - - - - - 120,000 Note: Financial plan utilizes the following order for use of funds to finance projects: grant revenues (if available), utility tax revenues and fund balance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 66 TABLE T- 2B (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 2,811,250 1,800,000 3,018,272 3,616,130 2,100,000 2,200,000 15,545,652 Total Costs 2,811,250 1,800,000 3,018,272 3,616,130 2,100,000 2,200,000 15,545,652 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 2,070,000 1,800,000 1,900,000 2,000,000 2,100,000 2,200,000 12,070,000 Grants 741,250 - 1,118,272 1,616,130 - - 3,475,652 REET 2 -Streets - - - - - - - Total Funding 2,811,250 1,800,000 3,018,272 3,616,130 2,100,000 2,200,000 15,545,652 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 67 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Arterial Street Preservation Program TIP# P-1 Project No:Varies annually, spbd01, cp1520, cp1718, cp1725, cp1803, cp1829, cp1926 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kenneth Clark LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund 27,332 2,200,000 327,500 1,650,000 2,554,832 Utility Tax 1,538,600 - - - 1,538,600 REET2 -Streets 1,948,779 - - - 1,948,779 Other -Development Fees 79,343 Grants -Federal 652,858 - - - 652,858 4,246,912 2,200,000 327,500 1,650,000 6,695,069 Capital Expenditures: Design 180,205 330,000 49,125 247,500 559,330 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 4,066,707 1,870,000 278,375 1,402,500 6,215,082 4,246,912 2,200,000 327,500 1,650,000 6,774,412 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 606,728 599,514 2,100,000 2,200,000 7,483,742 Utility Tax - - - - - REET2 -Streets - - - - - Grants -Federal - - - - - 606,728 599,514 2,100,000 2,200,000 7,483,742 Capital Expenditures: Design 91,009 89,927 315,000 330,000 1,122,561 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 515,719 509,587 1,785,000 1,870,000 6,361,181 606,728 599,514 2,100,000 2,200,000 7,483,742 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The program preserves classified streets throughout the City. Individual projects may include a combination of crack seal, overlays, rebuilds, and spot repairs. The program also funds the biennial collection of pavement condition ratings. This program is funded through a 1% utility tax that was adopted by City Council in 2008. Program funds reflect remaining budget after allocations to specific arterial street preservation projects which are included as separate projects in this TIP. Progress Summary: The 2020 construction cycle includes the reconstruction of 15th Street NW between West Valley Highway and Terrace Drive. The project will also overlay 15th Street NW between West Valley Highway and SR 167. A crack seal project of arterial and collector streets is also proposed. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This program is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 68 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 2 (8th St NE to 22nd St NE)TIP# P-1 Project No:cp1903 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Luis Barba LOS Corridor ID# 1/2 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund 123,206 398,000 10,000 - 531,206 Secured Federal Grants - 1,100,000 - - 1,100,000 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 123,206 1,498,000 10,000 - 1,631,206 Capital Expenditures: Design 123,206 30,500 - - 153,706 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,467,500 10,000 - 1,477,500 123,206 1,498,000 10,000 - 1,631,206 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 10,000 Secured Federal Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from 8th Street NE to 22nd Street NE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements. Progress Summary: Federal grant funding was awarded in 2016 and adjusted in 2019 to shift funds to A Street SE Preservation project (CP1819) to assist WSDOT with funds obligation targets. Project construction is underway in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are a placeholder for a potential 2020 project budget carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 69 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Auburn Way N Preservation Phase 3 (4th St SE to 8th St NE )TIP# P-1 Project No:cp1904 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Luis Barba LOS Corridor ID# 2 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund 16,648 948,551 10,000 - 975,199 Secured Federal Grants 100,078 875,062 - - 975,140 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 116,726 1,823,613 10,000 - 1,950,339 Capital Expenditures: Design 116,726 57,888 - - 174,614 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,765,725 10,000 - 1,775,725 116,726 1,823,613 10,000 - 1,950,339 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 10,000 Secured Federal Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: This project will grind and overlay Auburn Way N from approximately 8th Street NE to approximately 4th St SE, remove unused driveways, and upgrade all curb ramps and pedestrian signals to meet ADA requirements. Progress Summary: Federal Grant funding was awarded in 2016. Project construction is underway in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are a placeholder for a potential 2020 project budget carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 70 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 2nd Street SE Preservation TIP# P-3 Project No:CP2003 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Jai Carter Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - 46,000 347,500 - 393,500 Secured State Grant - 69,000 521,250 - 590,250 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 115,000 868,750 - 983,750 Capital Expenditures: Design - 115,000 - - 115,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 868,750 - 868,750 - 115,000 868,750 - 983,750 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 347,500 Secured State Grant - - - - 521,250 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 868,750 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 868,750 - - - - 868,750 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will reconstruct 2nd Street SE between A Street SE and Auburn Way S. The reconstruction will utilize full depth reclamation techniques. The project will also address fixed objects located within the clear zone, remove barriers to ADA access, and install new LED street lighting. Progress Summary: Grant funding for this project was awarded by TIB in 2019. The design phase started in 2020. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 71 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lake Tapps Pkwy/Sumner-Tapps Hwy E Preservation TIP# P-6 Project No:spbd08 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - 25,000 - Unsecured Grant - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - 25,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - 25,000 - Construction - - - - - - - - 25,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 75,000 534,356 - - 634,356 Unsecured Grant - 750,000 - - 750,000 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 75,000 1,284,356 - - 1,384,356 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 - - - 50,000 Right of Way 25,000 - - - 50,000 Construction 1,284,356 - - 1,284,356 75,000 1,284,356 - - 1,384,356 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will grind and overlay the Lake Tapps Parkway/Sumner-Tapps Highway E corridor from the intersection of Lake Tapps Parkway with Lakeland Hills Way to the intersection of Sumner-Tapps Highway E with 16th Street E (the Auburn City limit). Portions of the corridor include a center two-way left-turn lane which does not require preservation and would be omitted from the grind and overlay. The project scope also includes upgrades to ADA curb ramps and pedestrian push buttons, and replacement of vehicle detection at signalized intersections. Progress Summary: An application for grant funding for the project was submitted in 2020. If awarded, design will begin in 2022 and construction in 2024. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 72 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Bridge Deck Preservation TIP# P-9 Project No:CP2007 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kim Truong Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Secured Federal Grant - 547,850 100,000 - 647,850 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 547,850 100,000 - 647,850 Capital Expenditures: Design - 80,000 - 80,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 467,850 100,000 567,850 - 547,850 100,000 - 647,850 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Secured Federal Grant - - - - 100,000 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will grind and overlay the bridge deck in an effort to extend the overall service life of the bridge. Progress Summary: Grant funding was awarded in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 73 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: A St SE Preservation (37th Street SE to Lakeland Hills Way)TIP# P-10 Project No:spbd09 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 10 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - 25,000 - Unsecured Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - 25,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 25,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 25,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 100,000 866,130 - - 991,130 Unsecured Grants - 866,130 - - 866,130 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 100,000 1,732,260 - - 1,857,260 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 - - - 100,000 Right of Way 25,000 - - - 25,000 Construction - 1,732,260 - - 1,732,260 100,000 1,732,260 - - 1,857,260 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will grind and overlay A Street SE from 37th Street SE to the Auburn/Pacific City Limit and from the Pacific/Auburn City Limit to the intersection with Lakeland Hills Way). The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps, pedestrian push buttons, and replacement of vehicle detection loops. Progress Summary: An application for grant funding for the construction phase of this project was submitted in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 74 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: C Street SW Preservation (W Main St to GSA Signal)TIP# P-11 Project No:spbd06 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:TBD LOS Corridor ID# 13 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - 25,000 100,000 25,000 Unsecured Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - 25,000 100,000 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 25,000 75,000 25,000 Right of Way - - - 25,000 - Construction - - - - - - - 25,000 100,000 25,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund 1,118,272 - - - 1,243,272 Unsecured Grants 1,118,272 - - - 1,118,272 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - 2,236,544 - - - 2,361,544 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - 25,000 Construction 2,236,544 - - - 2,236,544 2,236,544 - - - 2,361,544 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will grind and overlay C Street SW from W Main Street to the GSA signal (approximately 2,000 feet to the south of 15th Street SW). The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps and pedestrian push buttons, and replacement of vehicle detection loops. Progress Summary: An application for grant funding for the construction phase of this project was submitted in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 75 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Fund Project Title: Lakeland Hill Way Preservation (57th Drive SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy)TIP# P-12 Project No:cp2011 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom LOS Corridor ID# 26 Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - 100,000 1,350,000 - 1,450,000 Secured Federal Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 100,000 1,350,000 - 1,450,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,350,000 - 1,350,000 - 100,000 1,350,000 - 1,450,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - 1,350,000 Secured Federal Grants - - - - - Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 1,350,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,350,000 - - - - 1,350,000 Grants / Other Sources: Description: The project will grind, patch, and overlay Lakeland Hills Way from 57th Drive SE to Lake Tapps Pkwy. The project also includes ADA upgrades to curb ramps and replacement of vehicle detection loops. Progress Summary: Grant funding for the construction phase of this project was awarded in 2018. However, to assist the region in meeting obligation targets for Federal funding, the grant funds awarded for this project were re-allocated to the Auburn Way Phase 2 and Phase 3 preservation projects to be completed in 2020. The re-allocation requires that the City commits to completing this project as originally planned using non-federal funding sources. Additional project scope added in 2020 to continute grind and overlay east from Lake Tapps Parkway to 72nd Street SE. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 76 ARTERIAL STREET PRESERVATION FUND (105)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Special Revenue Funds Project Title: 3rd Street SW Bridges Deck Preservation TIP# P-13 Project No:CP2006 Project Type:Non-Capacity, Preservation Project Manager:Kim Truong Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Secured Federal Grant - 523,540 120,000 - 643,540 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - 523,540 120,000 - 643,540 Capital Expenditures: Design - 120,000 - - 120,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 403,540 120,000 - 523,540 - 523,540 120,000 - 643,540 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Arterial Preservation Fund - - - - - Secured Federal Grant - - - - 120,000 Utility Tax - - - - - Bond proceeds - - - - - - - - - 120,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 120,000 - - - - 120,000 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: This project will seal and overlay the 3rd Street SW bridge decks in an effort to extend the overall service life of the bridges. The following bridges are included in the project: 3rd Street off-ramp, 3rd Street SW over the BNSF tracks, and 3rd Street SW over A Street SW. Progress Summary: Grant funding was awarded in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project is anticipated to reduce the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 77 TABLE T-3 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ON FUTURE OPERATING BUDGETS Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Lea Hill Road/112th Ave SE Roundabout -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1,000$ 1,000$ 2 29th St SE & R St SE Intersection Imp.- - - 500 500 500 1,500 3 R St SE & 21st St SE Int. Safety Imp.- - - - 1,000 1,000 2,000 4 Auburn Way S & 6th Street SE - - - - - 500 500 5 SE 304th Street/132nd Avenue SE Roundabout - - - - 1,000 1,000 2,000 6 10th St NW & A St NW Intersection Imp.- - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 4,000 7 F Street SE, Downtown to Les Gove 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 4,100 24,600 8 Riverwalk Dr SE Non-Motorized Imp.- 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 10,000 9 A Street Loop - - - 1,000 1,000 1,000 3,000 10 A Street NW, Phase 2 (W Main St to 3rd St NW)- - - - 500 500 1,000 11 AWS Imp. -Hemlock St SE to Poplar St SE - - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 7,500 12 M Street NE, E. Main to 4th - - - 500 500 500 1,500 13 49th Street NE (AWN to D St NE)- 500 500 500 500 500 2,500 14 46th Place S Realignment - - - - - 1,000 1,000 15 Regional Growth Center Access Imp.- - 500 500 500 500 2,000 16 East Valley Highway Widening - - 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 10,000 17 Garden Garden Avenue Re-Alignment - 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 5,000 18 ITS Dynamic Message Signs 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 2,250 13,500 Total 6,350$ 9,850$ 13,850$ 18,350$ 20,850$ 23,350$ 92,600$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 78 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 79 WATER Current Facilities The City of Auburn water utility provides water supply, treatment, transmission, storage, distribution, and service connections to in-City residences and businesses. The City also provides water to the City of Algona and Lake Meridian Water District under wholesale agreements. The water system consists of wells, springs and interties for source; chlorination stations and corrosion control for treatment; pump stations, pressure reducing stations and pipelines for transmission; and steel and concrete enclosed reservoirs for storage. Table W -1, “Facilities Inventory”, lists the facilities along with their current capacities and approximate locations. Level of Service (LOS) The City’s Comprehensive Water Plan summarizes the design criteria and service polices for the City’s water distribution system. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City of Auburn’s water system anticipates eight capacity projects in the amount of $15,151,757 and twenty-eight non-capacity projects totaling $30,647,941 for a 6-year planning expectation total of $45,799,698. The financing plan is shown in Table W -2 followed by individual worksheets showing the project details. The capacity projects will increase water supply quantities, storage, and distribution for growth of retail customers. The non-capacity projects will provide for pipeline improvements and replacements, delivery pressure improvements, water quality enhancements, comprehensive and resource management planning, pump station upgrades, telemetry system improvements, and meter upgrades. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table W -3 shows, operating budget impacts of $5,400 are forecasted for water supply and distribution facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 80 TABLE W-1 Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY WATER RIGHT (MGD - max rate)LOCATION Water Supply: Coal Creek Springs Certificate 857 9.70<2.52>*3401 Stuck River Rd Well 1 Certificate 3560-A 3.17 1136 M St SE Well 2 G1-00277 C 3.46 1109 5th St NE Well 3A G1-23629 C 4.03 401 37th St SE Well 3B (Included Above)(Included Above)401 37th St SE Well 4 G1-20391 C 4.03 950 25th St SE Well 5 G1-23633 C 1.44 5530 James Ave SE Well 5A (Included Above)(Included Above)5401 Olive Way SE Well 5B (Included Above)(Included Above)West end of 62nd Ct SE Well 6 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4)5.04 (supplemental)1109 5th St NE Well 7 (Supplemental to Wells 1, 2, 3A, 3B, 4)5.04 (supplemental)405 E St NE West Hill Springs Claim (1973 File Date)0.9 1900 15th St NW Ext Supply Total (MGD)26.73 Available for Use 24.21 * Denotes deduction of 1,750 gpm (Qi/2,824 ac-ft/yr) to comply with the provisions of the Muckleshoot-Auburn Stipulated Agreement. CAPACITY FACILITY (MGD)LOCATION SERVICE AREA Intertie Tacoma B Street NW 3.2 3240 B St NW Valley Service Area Tacoma 132nd Ave SE 3.2 29598 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Intertie Total (MGD)6.4 CAPACITY FACILITY (MG)LOCATION SERVICE AREA Storage Facilities: Academy Reservoir 8A 1.2 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Academy Reservoir 8B 1.5 5031 Auburn Way S Academy Service Area Lakeland Hills Reservoir 5 1.0 1326 57th Dr SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Lakeland Hills Reservoir 6 1.0 5718 Francis Ct SE Lakeland Hills Svc Area Lea Hill Reservoir 4A 1.0 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Lea Hill Reservoir 4B 1.5 30502 132nd Ave SE Lea Hill Service Area Valley Reservoir 1 5.0 2003 Auburn Way S Valley Service Area Valley Reservoir 2 3.6 32115 105th Place S Valley Service Area Storage Total (MG)15.8 CITY OF AUBURN WATER SYSTEM City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 81 TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Booster Pump Stations: Academy 1: 2 pumps 800 2004 Auburn Way S Academy 2: 2 pumps 1,500 2004 Auburn Way S Academy East: 6 pumps 2,820 5031 Auburn Way S Green River: 4 pumps 4,680 29621 Green River Rd SE Intertie: 7 pumps 4,830 30502 132nd Ave SE Lakeland Hills: 5 pumps 3,200 1118 57th Place SE Lea Hill: 3 pumps 2,100 10406 Lea Hill Rd SE Terrace View: 3 pumps 1,500 6134 Alexander Place SE Wilderness Game Farm Pk: 2 pumps 1,050 2401 Stuck River Rd CAPACITY Primary Valve FACILITY (PSI - Inlet/Outlet)LOCATION Pressure Reducing Stations: Serves Valley Pressure Zone: 25th Street SE #1110-10 N/C 25th St SE & K St SE B Street Intertie 88/55 3300 B St NW Green River Pump Station N/C 29621 Green River Rd SE Howard Road CCF #1011-10 82/65 Howard Rd Howard Road CCF By-Pass #1011-20 -Howard Rd (Bypass) Lea Hill Pump Station N/C 10406 Lea Hill Rd SE Riverwalk # 1111-10 115/80 Riverwalk Dr SE & Howard Rd Riverwalk # 1111-20 90/50 2204 27th St. SE Serves Lea Hill: 132nd Avenue Intertie 150/70 132nd Ave SE & 295th St Amber View North #711-10 150/65 105th Pl SE & 320th Pl Amber View South #711-20 142/60 106th Pl SE Near Reservoir 2 Carriage Square Upper #611-30 145/50 Lea Hill Rd & 107 Pl Cobble Creek Lower #411-20 86/40 SE 304th Pl & SE 101st Place Cobble Creek Upper #411-10 94/55 104th Ave SE (South of 303rd Road) Lea Hill #412-10 84/45 SE 298th Place & 109 Ave SE Lea Hill #412-30 N/C 300 Block & 108th Ave SE Lea Hill #511-10 87/45 304th St. SE and 108th Ave SE Lea Hill #512-10 80/60 304th St. SE and 110th Pl SE Serves Academy: Academy Pump Station N/C 2004 Auburn Way S Auburn Way South #1011-30 130/80 2003 Auburn Way S Auburn Way South #1114-10 88/55 4500 Auburn Way S Lemon Tree -5031 Auburn Way S City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 82 TABLE W-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Water Facilities CAPACITY Primary Valve FACILITY (PSI - Inlet/Outlet)LOCATION Serves Lakeland Hills: Lakeland Hills #1309-10 120/55 Mill Pond Dr @ Oravetz Rd Lakeland Hills #1310-10 130/55 Mill Pond Dr & Mill Pond Loop Lakeland Hills #1310-20 108/36 Kennedy Ave SE River Rock Lakeland Hills #1409-10 N/C Oravetz & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1409-20 120/56 47th SE & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1409-30 95/70 Lakeland Hills Way & 51st St SE Lakeland Hills #1409-40 84/55 Mill Pond Dr & Lakeland Hills Way Lakeland Hills #1410-10 103/50 5018 Mill Pond Dr Lakeland Hills #1410-20 N/C 51st St. SE east of Mill Pond Loop Lakeland Hills #1410-30 125/70 Nathan Ave & Highland Dr Lakeland Hills #1410-40 82/55 5203 Quincy Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-10 80/42 Bennett Ave & 56th Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-20 82/55 5310 Bennett Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-30 155/73 5100 Kersey Way Lakeland Hills #1411-40 82/52 2305 54th St SE Lakeland Hills #1411-50 85/44 5253 Wesley Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1411-60 90/64 5233 Victoria Avenue Lakeland Hills #1412-10 82/55 5539 Franklin Ave SE Lakeland Hills #1412-20 75/40 Kersey Way SE School Lakeland Hills #1509-10 174/60 Terrace View Lower (6170) Lakeland Hills #1509-20 160/73 Terrace View Middle (5960) Lakeland Hills #1509-30 138/47 Terrace View Upper (5810) Lakeland Hills #1509-40 230/90 Terrace View & Alexander Place SE Lakeland Hills #1510-10 N/C Lakeland Hills Way & Evergreen Way N/C - Normally Closed CAPACITY FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Corrosion Control: Howard Road 5,550 2101 Howard Rd SE Fulmer Field 9,375 1113 5th St NE Chlorination Stations: Coal Creek Springs Station 5,000 (gravity feed)3401 Stuck River Rd West Hill Springs Station 625 (gravity feed)1900 15th St NW Well 1 2,200 1136 M St SE Well 4 2,600 950 25th St SE Well 5A 180 5401 Olive Ave SE Well 5B 600 1100 63rd St SE FACILITY CAPACITY LOCATION Water Supply: Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MGD 4501 47th St SE Storage Facilities: Braunwood Satellite 1 0.03 MG 4501 47th St SE Booster Pump Stations: Braunwood: 3 Pumps 2.0 GPM 4501 47th St SE BRAUNWOOD SATELLITE WATER SYSTEM City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 83 TABLE W-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING WATER DIVISION 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 88 Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase Capital Costs 934,810 934,810 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Funding Sources: Water Fund 934,810 934,810 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 89 Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement Capital Costs 3,000,000 609,500 - - - - 3,609,500 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 609,500 - - - - 609,500 Bond Proceeds 3,000,000 - - - - - 3,000,000 90 Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation Capital Costs - - - - - 1,125,509 1,125,509 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 1,125,509 1,125,509 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 91 Algona Well 1 Decommissioning Capital Costs - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 92 Annual Distribution System Improvements Program Capital Costs - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 93 Howard Road CCTF Expansion Capital Costs - - - - - 348,908 348,908 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 348,908 348,908 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 94 Valley Service Area Reservoir No. 3 Capital Costs - 50,000 - - - 700,000 750,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 50,000 - - - 700,000 750,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 95 Well 5/5A Upgrades Capital Costs - - - - 947,000 112,000 1,059,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - 947,000 112,000 1,059,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 3,934,810 1,594,310 1,284,805 1,934,805 2,181,805 4,221,222 15,151,757 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 84 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 96 Well Inspection and Redevelopment Program Capital Costs - 185,000 - - 200,000 - 385,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 185,000 - - 200,000 - 385,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 97 Water Repair & Replacements Capital Costs - 100,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,700,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,600,000 Bond Proceeds - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 98 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs - 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 200,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 99 Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation Capital Costs - - - 262,000 - 298,000 560,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 262,000 - 298,000 560,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 100 Intertie Booster Pump Station Improvements Capital Costs - - - - - 250,000 250,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 250,000 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 101 Reservoir Painting Capital Costs - - - - - 1,747,026 1,747,026 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 1,747,026 1,747,026 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 102 Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main Replacement Capital Costs 10,000 2,425,000 - - - - 2,435,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Grant - 225,000 - - - - 225,000 DWSRF Loan - 2,200,000 - - - - 2,200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 103 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 104 Reservoir Repair and Replacements Capital Costs 50,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 50,000 62,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 105 Pipeline Asset Management Study Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 85 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 106 2021 Local Street Reconstruction Capital Costs 2,520,000 - - - - - 2,520,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 2,520,000 - - - - - 2,520,000 107 2022 Local Street Reconstruction Capital Costs 50,000 800,000 - - - - 850,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 50,000 100,000 - - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - 700,000 - - - - 700,000 108 M Street NE Widening Capital Costs - 37,000 - 320,000 - - 357,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 37,000 - 320,000 - - 357,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 109 Auburn Way South - Hemlock Street SE to Poplar Street SE Capital Costs - - 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 110 Water Trench Patches Program Capital Costs 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 150,000 155,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 111 Lea Hill Pump Station Replacement Capital Costs - - - - 491,000 746,333 1,237,333 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - 491,000 746,333 1,237,333 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 112 Deduct Meter Replacement Program Capital Costs 515,000 485,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 Bond Proceeds 515,000 385,000 - - - - 900,000 113 Comprehensive Water Plan Capital Costs - 263,000 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 263,000 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 114 Lea Hill AC Main Replacement Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 115 Reservoir 2 Valves Capital Costs - 240,000 760,000 - - - 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 240,000 760,000 - - - 1,000,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 86 TABLE W-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 116 104th Park Development (104th to 102nd Water Main Loop) Capital Costs 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 117 Garden Avenue Realignment Capital Costs 55,000 440,000 - - - - 495,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 55,000 440,000 - - - - 495,000 Grants - - - - - - - 118 Lead Service Line Replacement Capital Costs 2,900,000 1,600,000 - - - - 4,500,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - 405,000 - - - - 405,000 Bond Proceeds 205,000 1,195,000 - - - - 1,400,000 DWSRF Loan 2,695,000 - - - - - 2,695,000 119 Well 4 Pump Improvements Capital Costs 147,000 830,000 - - - - 977,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 147,000 830,000 - - - - 977,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 120 Water Resources Protection Program (Wellhead Protection) Capital Costs 26,800 27,700 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 Funding Sources: Water Fund 26,800 27,700 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 121 Game Farm Park Pump Station/Distribution System Improvements Capital Costs - - - - - 69,782 69,782 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - - - 69,782 69,782 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 122 Meter Vault Replacement Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 123 West Hill Springs Water Quality Improvements Capital Costs - - - 100,000 480,000 - 580,000 Funding Sources: Water Fund - - - 100,000 480,000 - 580,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 6,713,800 7,849,700 5,439,500 2,518,400 3,439,200 4,687,341 30,647,941 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 87 TABLE W-2 (continued) SUMMARY: 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 3,934,810 1,594,310 1,284,805 1,934,805 2,181,805 4,221,222 15,151,757 Non-Capacity Projects 6,713,800 7,849,700 5,439,500 2,518,400 3,439,200 4,687,341 30,647,941 Total Costs 10,648,610 9,444,010 6,724,305 4,453,205 5,621,005 8,908,563 45,799,698 FUNDING SOURCES: Water Fund 1,713,610 4,639,010 6,724,305 4,453,205 5,621,005 8,908,563 32,059,698 DWSRF Loan 2,695,000 2,200,000 - - - - 4,895,000 Grants - 225,000 - - - - 225,000 Bond Proceeds 6,240,000 2,380,000 - - - - 8,620,000 Total Funding 10,648,610 9,444,010 6,724,305 4,453,205 5,621,005 8,908,563 45,799,698 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 88 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Cascade Water Alliance Water Purchase Project No:cp1914 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Susan Fenhaus Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 252,586 934,805 934,810 934,810 2,122,201 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 252,586 934,805 934,810 934,810 2,122,201 Capital Expenditures: Water Supply Purchase 252,586 934,805 934,810 934,810 2,122,201 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 252,586 934,805 934,810 934,810 2,122,201 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Capital Expenditures: Water Supply Purchase 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 934,805 934,805 934,805 934,805 5,608,840 Financing of System Development Charges for the right to purchase water from Tacoma Public Utilities through the Second Supply Pipeline to meet future projected demand, based on agreements with Cascade Water Alliance. Council approved the agreements for permanent and reserve wholesale supply in September 2013. A new agreement with Tacoma was executed in 2014. Budget reflects purchase of permanent supply - payments of $934,805 will continue from 2020 through 2029. Reserve supply will not be purchased and is not included. Comprehensive Plan project S-04. Progress Summary: Ongoing payments through 2029 Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 89 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Academy Pump Station #1 Pump Replacement Project No:cp1916 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Bender Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 609,500 609,500 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds 71,479 671,500 3,000,000 - 3,742,979 Other - - - - - 71,479 671,500 3,000,000 609,500 4,352,479 Capital Expenditures: Design 71,479 671,500 - - 742,979 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 3,000,000 609,500 3,609,500 71,479 671,500 3,000,000 609,500 4,352,479 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 609,500 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 3,000,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 3,609,500 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 3,609,500 - - - - 3,609,500 The pump station is reaching the end of its useful life. The project will construct a new pump station with 4 pumps to meet peak demands and fire flow requirements. Pump station #1 will be removed and pump station #2 will be used for storage after the pumps are removed. Preliminary design found it to be more cost effective to build a new pump station and decommission both existing pump stations. The backup power generator will be replaced. Comprehensive Plan project PS-07. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 90 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation Project No:wabd07 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 50,000 - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 1,125,509 1,125,509 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 1,125,509 1,125,509 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 500,000 500,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 625,509 625,509 - - - 1,125,509 1,125,509 Rehabilitation of the Coal Creek Springs middle collector will improve capacity of the springs resulting in greater utilization of the water right. Comprehensive Plan project S-09. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were esclated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 91 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Algona Well 1 Decommissioning Project No:wabd08 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 50,000 - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 50,000 - - 50,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 50,000 - - - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 - - - 50,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The Algona well has been temporarily abandoned and all related facilities removed. This project will have the well properly decommissioned by a State of Washington-licensed well driller, once the water rights have been transferred to an alternate source. Comprehensive Plan project S-14. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 92 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Distribution System Improvements Program Project No:wabd09, cp1819, cp1904 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 300,000 - - - 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 300,000 - - - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 300,000 - - - 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 300,000 - - - 300,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 300,000 - 300,000 - 600,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 2,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 2,600,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Program to fund capacity-related improvements to the water distribution system to address low pressures during peak hour demand and fire flows. Comprehensive Plan project D-02. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 93 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Howard Road CCTF Expansion Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 348,908 348,908 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 348,908 348,908 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 348,908 348,908 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 348,908 348,908 With the completion of the Coal Creek Springs Rehabilitation, the Howard Road Corrosion Control Treatment Facility will exceed its current capacity. This project will add one aeration tower and one blower pump to match the existing towers and blowers. Comprehensive Plan project S-18. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Preliminary planning underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual maintenance cost is estimated to be approximately $600. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 94 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Valley Service Area Reservoir No. 3 Project No:wabd26 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 50,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 50,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 700,000 750,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 700,000 750,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Property Acquisition - - - 700,000 700,000 Construction - - - - - - - 700,000 750,000 A new 1 million gallon storage facility is needed to meet future storage requirements in the Valley Service Area. Comprehensive Plan project R-04. Progress Summary: Project costs were escalated in 2018 at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Reservoir siting study will be conducted in 2022, with property acquisition in 2026. Design of the project will be completed in 2028, with construction in 2028-2029. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 95 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Well 5/5A Upgrades Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 947,000 112,000 1,059,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 947,000 112,000 1,059,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 112,000 112,000 Right of Way - - 947,000 - 947,000 Construction - - - - - - - 947,000 112,000 1,059,000 This project was identified in the 2016 Facilities Evaluation Study. Well 5 is in need of a new building, backup generator, chlorination, pump, and hydrologic investigation to evaluate the well's production. Due to the small size of the existing site, the acquisition of an adjacent parcel may be required. The Facilities Evaluation Study also identified the need for a new pump and motor in Well 5A. Comprehensive Plan project S-06. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. The hydrologic study and property acquisition are anticipated to begin in 2025. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 96 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Well Inspection and Redevelopment Program Project No:wabd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 150,000 - 185,000 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 150,000 - 185,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 150,000 - 185,000 150,000 - 150,000 - 185,000 150,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 200,000 - 385,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 200,000 - 385,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 200,000 - 385,000 - - 200,000 - 385,000 No significant impact. Program for inspection and redevelopment of supply wells and springs necessary to ensure production at maximum capacity for efficient utilization. Comprehensive Plan project S-07. Progress Summary: 2020 funds are estimated carryforward from 2019 budget. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 97 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Repair & Replacements Project No:wabd02 Project Type:Non-Capacity (R&R) Project Manager:Various Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - 170,000 - 100,000 170,000 Other - - - - - - 170,000 - 100,000 170,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 170,000 - 100,000 170,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 170,000 - 100,000 170,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,600,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 100,000 Other - - - - - 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 300,000 - 300,000 700,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 2,000,000 1,000,000 300,000 1,000,000 300,000 2,700,000 Program to fund distribution system repair and replacement projects required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Projects will be coordinated with the streets and other utility projects. Comprehensive Plan project D-09. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 98 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:wabd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Various Description: Progress Summary: CP1926 was funded under this program and will be completed in 2020. No significant impact Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 1,500,000 - - 200,000 1,500,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - 500,000 - - 500,000 Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:1,500,000 500,000 - 200,000 2,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,400,000 500,000 - 200,000 1,900,000 Total Expenditures:1,500,000 500,000 - 200,000 2,000,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Total Expenditures:1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 4,200,000 Water main improvements in coordination with the Local Street Preservation Program and general arterial street improvements. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 99 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Seismic Rehabilitation Project No:wabd16 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 86,000 - - 86,000 Grants -Unsecured Federal - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 86,000 - - 86,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 86,000 - - 86,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 86,000 - - 86,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 262,000 - 298,000 560,000 Grants -Unsecured Federal - - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - 262,000 - 298,000 560,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 65,000 - 88,000 153,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 197,000 - 210,000 407,000 - 262,000 - 298,000 560,000 Install seismic control valves on outlet piping of Reservoirs 4A, 4B, 8A, and 8B. This project will include a study to identify work to be completed at each site, and to further define project costs at each site. Costs for the remaining reservoirs will be updated based on the study. Seismic control valve for Reservoir 2 is a separate project. Comprehensive Plan project R-06. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. The study to identify the work to be completed at each site is underway in 2020. Individual sites will be planned based on the study results. 2020 funds are estimated carryforward from 2019 budget. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 100 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Intertie Booster Pump Station Improvements Project No:wabd05 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 250,000 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 250,000 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 250,000 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 250,000 250,000 Project will provide additional piping and modify the existing Intertie/ Lea Hill Booster pump station building to utilize the existing Intertie pumps for the Boosted zone. The project will also add pressure reducing valves and control valves at Lea Hill reservoirs, and system valves to provide efficient operation of the 132nd Ave Tacoma Intertie. Comprehensive Plan projects D-06, and PS-04. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 101 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Painting Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 1,747,026 1,747,026 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - 1,747,026 1,747,026 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 227,026 227,026 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,520,000 1,520,000 - - - 1,747,026 1,747,026 Maintenance of reservoirs requires periodic painting to protect the steel and increase the useful life of the reservoir. Comprehensive Plan project R-05. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 102 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main Replacement Project No:cp1603 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 164,922 244,945 10,000 - 419,867 Parks Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - 225,000 - DWSRF Loan 81,575 135,079 - 2,200,000 216,654 Bond Proceeds - - - - - 246,497 380,024 10,000 2,425,000 636,521 Capital Expenditures: Design 246,497 380,024 10,000 - 636,521 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,425,000 - 246,497 380,024 10,000 2,425,000 636,521 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Parks Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - 225,000 DWSRF Loan - - - - 2,200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 2,435,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,425,000 - - - - 2,435,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The facilities evaluation study conducted in 2013-2014 found a suspected leak on the 24" steel transmission main crossing the White River. This project will provide for full replacement of the river crossing via a pedistrian bridge. Parks Department will participate in the project by providing funding from grants for the trail connections to the bridge. This option eliminates the deep blow- off and allows more flexibility for expansion. A future project would rehabilitate the existing crossing for redundancy. Comprehensive Plan project D-11. Progress Summary: Design underway in 2019 and 2020. A DWSRF loan was applied for in 2020 for construction in 2022. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 103 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:cp1416 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 15,172 55,708 10,000 - 80,880 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - 334,000 - - 334,000 15,172 389,708 10,000 - 414,880 Capital Expenditures: Design 15,172 - - - 15,172 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 389,708 10,000 - 399,708 15,172 389,708 10,000 - 414,880 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - PWTFL - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with F Street SE street improvements. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Progress Summary: Construction underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 104 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir Repair and Replacements Project No:wabd12 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 50,000 50,000 50,000 62,000 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 62,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 62,000 150,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 62,000 150,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 64,000 66,000 68,000 70,000 380,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: General reservoir maintenance and minor improvements. Comprehensive Plan project R-03. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 105 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pipeline Asset Management Study Project No:cp1934 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Fenhaus Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 106,000 10,000 - 116,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 106,000 10,000 - 116,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 106,000 10,000 - 116,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 106,000 10,000 - 116,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Pipeline asset management study will identify the remaining useful life of water mains in the system, prioritize pipe replacements, and develop replacement costs to phase in the replacements. Transmission and distribution mains along Auburn Way South, C St SW, Lea Hill Road and West Hill Springs will be evaluated. Comprehensive Plan project D-10. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of completion. Assessment underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 106 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2021 Local Street Reconstruction Project No:cp2019 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Kim Troung Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - 100,000 2,520,000 - 2,620,000 Other - - - - - - 100,000 2,520,000 - 2,620,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 2,520,000 - 2,520,000 - 100,000 2,520,000 - 2,620,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 2,520,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 2,520,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,520,000 - - - - 2,520,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will construct water main improvements on G Street SE between E. Main Street and 4th Street SE and in various streets in the Riverwalk neighborhood. The improvements are coordination with the 2021 Local Street Preservation project and include replacing 1,250 feet of 4" cast iron pipe with 8" ductile iron water main and 43 services on G ST SE. and replacement of 4,360 feet of 6" cast iron pipe and 730 feet of 4" cast iron with 8" ductile iron main and 110 services in the Riverwalk area. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 107 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2022 Local Street Reconstruction Project No:wabd27 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 50,000 100,000 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - 700,000 - Other - - - - - - - 50,000 800,000 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - 50,000 - 50,000 Construction - - - 800,000 - - - 50,000 800,000 50,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 700,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 850,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - 50,000 Construction - - - - 800,000 - - - - 850,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will construct water main improvements on I Street SE from E. Main Street to 4th Street SE as part of the 2022 Local Street Preservation project. Improvements include replacement of 1,250 feet of 4" cast iron pipe with 8" ductile iron water main and 40 services. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Progress Summary: Project scoping and preliminary design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 108 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street NE Widening Project No:wabd13 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 37,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 37,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 37,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 37,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 320,000 - - 357,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 320,000 - - 357,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 37,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 320,000 - - 320,000 - 320,000 - - 357,000 Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with streets project: M ST NE widening (E Main to 4th St NE). Work includes replacing 26 services, connecting to existing 12" ductile main, and abandoning 6" cast main in place. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 109 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Auburn Way South - Hemlock Street SE to Poplar Street SE Project No:cp1622 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 66,000 - 66,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 66,000 - - 66,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 66,000 - 66,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 66,000 - - 66,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 2,176,000 256,000 - - 2,432,000 Water main improvements constructed in conjunction with Auburn Way South street improvements. Project will replace approximately 2,300 feet of 10" cast iron line with 12" ductile Iron water main. Comprehensive Plan project D-06. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Design underway in 2020 in conjunction with Auburn School District's Chinook Middle School Replacement project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 110 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Trench Patches Program Project No:wabdxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 150,000 155,000 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 150,000 155,000 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 150,000 155,000 150,000 - - 150,000 155,000 150,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 160,000 165,000 170,000 175,000 975,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This program provides annual funding for roadway restoration of trench patches from water leak repair and water service installation that are beyond the scope of work done by maintenance staff. Progress Summary: Program was developed in 2020 to adhere to pavement restoration requirements in the City Engineering Design standards. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 111 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill Pump Station Replacement Project No:wabd18 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 491,000 746,333 1,237,333 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 491,000 746,333 1,237,333 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 491,000 - 491,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 746,333 746,333 - - 491,000 746,333 1,237,333 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Lea Hill pump station will be reconstructed to provide redundant pumped supply to the Lea Hill area. If the Green River Pump Station is out of service for maintenance, a redundant pump station would avoid the need to purchase more expensive regional surface water through the 132nd Intertie. The pump station needs to be relocated from its current location on the shoulder of Lea Hill Road at the base of a steep hill for safety and reliability considerations. The project will also construct approximately 900 feet of 12" transmission main along Lea Hill Rd from Garden Avenue to the existing pump station site. Comprehensive Plan project PS-10. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Property acquisition underway in 2020 under Garden Ave Realignment project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 112 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Deduct Meter Replacement Program Project No:cp1917 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Bender Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 24,000 12,500 - 100,000 36,500 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - 476,000 515,000 385,000 991,000 Other - - - - - 24,000 488,500 515,000 485,000 1,027,500 Capital Expenditures: Design 24,000 12,500 15,000 - 51,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 476,000 500,000 485,000 976,000 24,000 488,500 515,000 485,000 1,027,500 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 900,000 Other - - - - - - - - - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 985,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Approximately 200 non-single family irrigation meters within the water system are connected to the customer's supply line on the customer side of the domestic meter, instead of being directly connected to the water main. Since sewer charges for non-single family customers are based on the domestic water meter reading and irrigation water does not use the sewer system, customers ask to have the irrigation use deducted from their overall domestic use for sewer billing purposes. Thus, irrigation meters installed after the domestic meter are referred to as "deduct meters". To improve the billing process, increase staff efficiencies and eliminate manual calculations in the billing process this project will re-install the irrigation meters to directly connect to the main. Deduct meters will be converted to irrigation meters to more equitably bill water usage. Progress Summary: Construction was planned and budgeted to be completed in 4 years. Recent bids indicate the original cost estimate was low. The budget was increased in 2021 and 2022, and the project will be completed in 3 years (2020-2022). Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 113 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Water Plan Project No:wabd25 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Susan Fenhaus Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 122,000 - 263,000 122,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 122,000 - 263,000 122,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 122,000 - 263,000 122,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 122,000 - 263,000 122,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 251,000 20,000 - - 534,000 Update the Comprehensive Water Plan as required by Washington Department of Health (DOH) by May 2022. DOH changed WAC to require a 10-year planning period which is an increase from the 6-year period. Our current plan was approved before the code change, but was written to include the 10-year period in anticipation of the revised code. We will provide letter to DOH requesting extension of approved plan by the end of 2021. The letter will include a report of the demand forecast compared to actual demand, and report of the capital improvement plan. If the extension is approved, our next complete plan will be due in 2025. However, the water plan will need to be updated in conjunction with the City's Comprehensive Plan due in 2024. Progress Summary: Request for current plan extension will be completed in 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 114 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lea Hill AC Main Replacement Project No:cp1929 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 440,000 10,000 - 450,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds 31,450 2,466,550 - - 2,498,000 Other - - - - - 31,450 2,906,550 10,000 - 2,948,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 31,450 240,000 - - 271,450 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 2,666,550 10,000 - 2,676,550 31,450 2,906,550 10,000 - 2,948,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Distribution system repair and replacement project required for meeting peak demands and reducing system losses. Project will replace asbestos cement (AC) water main in the Lea Hill service area. Progress Summary: Construction underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 115 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Reservoir 2 Valves Project No:wabd29 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 240,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 240,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 240,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 240,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 760,000 - - - 1,000,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 760,000 - - - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 240,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 760,000 - - - 760,000 760,000 - - - 1,000,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will replace the existing 20" supply valve with a seismic control valve, and replace the 12" drain valve at Reservoir 2. Both valves will be installed in a vault. This project was identified as a maintenance issue due to limited access to the valves. The addition of a seismic control will improve the resiliency of the distribution system. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 116 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 104th Park Development (104th to 102nd Water Main Loop) Project No:cp1619 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 50,000 250,000 - 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 250,000 - 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 250,000 - 250,000 - 50,000 250,000 - 300,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 250,000 - - - - 250,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will construct a water main between 102nd Avenue SE and 104 Avenue SE is part of a Parks Department project that is developing a new City park. The new water main will eliminate convert the existing dead-end system to a looped system, as recommended by the Comprehensive Plan. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 117 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Garden Avenue Realignment Project No:cp2022 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - 400,000 55,000 440,000 455,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 400,000 55,000 440,000 455,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 55,000 - 55,000 Right of Way - 400,000 - - 400,000 Construction - - - 440,000 - - 400,000 55,000 440,000 455,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 495,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 495,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 55,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 440,000 - - - - 495,000 This project will construct water improvements as part of the Garden Avenue Realignment transportation project. The improvements incude installation of 1,000 feet of 12" transmission main from the 20" existing main in 8th St NE along Garden Avenue to the location of a future new booster pump station site on property to be purchased on 102nd Ave SE, and then back to 8th St NE. Progress Summary: Property acquisition underway in 2020 to support Lea Hill pump station project. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 118 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Lead Service Line Replacement Project No:cp1922 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 405,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - 205,000 1,195,000 205,000 DWSRF 12,532 292,468 2,695,000 3,000,000 12,532 292,468 2,900,000 1,600,000 3,205,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 12,532 292,468 - - 305,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 2,900,000 1,600,000 2,900,000 12,532 292,468 2,900,000 1,600,000 3,205,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 405,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - 1,400,000 DWSRF - - - - 2,695,000 - - - - 4,500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 4,500,000 - - - - 4,500,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The City has approximately 1,000 service lines with a lead goose-neck connection at the main. State and Federal agencies are planning a 15 year period for utilities to remove all lead service lines. This project will remove lead service lines and construct associated roadway restoration throughout the City. Any additional lead service lines that are not removed and replaced with this project will be replaced as part of future rehabilitation and replacement projects. Progress Summary: City received a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) loan for replacement of the lead service lines. Design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 119 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Well 4 Pump Improvements Project No:wabd22 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - 147,000 830,000 147,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 147,000 830,000 147,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 147,000 - 147,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 830,000 - - - 147,000 830,000 147,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 977,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 977,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 147,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 830,000 - - - - 977,000 This project was identified in the Facilities Evaluation Study. The project will include a comprehensive investigation and evaluation of the well operation. Findings from the evaluation will likely result in replacing the generator with a larger unit, possibly replacing the motor soft starter with a varible frequency drive (VFD), and replacing aging control valves, gate valves, and air relief system. Comprehensive Plan project S-22. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of construction. Design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 120 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Water Resources Protection Program (Wellhead Protection) Project No:wabd23 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 25,300 26,100 26,800 27,700 78,200 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 25,300 26,100 26,800 27,700 78,200 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 25,300 26,100 26,800 27,700 78,200 25,300 26,100 26,800 27,700 78,200 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 28,500 29,400 30,200 31,200 173,800 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Annual funding for implementing strategies identified in the Wellhead Protection Plan. Although some tasks will be performed as part of the water operations budget, other tasks will require consultants with expertise in review and investigation of contaminant sites and other environmental databases, development of spill response plans, and leaking underground storage tanks. Comprehensive Plan project S-08. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of completion. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 121 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Game Farm Park Pump Station/Distribution System Improvements Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - 69,782 69,782 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 69,782 69,782 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 69,782 69,782 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 69,782 69,782 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The pumps at Game Farm Wilderness Park are in need of replacement, and the building need repairs. This project was identified in the 2015 Comprehensive Plan as occurring in the short to mid term, or by 2025. Installation of new water main crossing the White River to eliminate the pump station was identified as being completed by 2035. The Coal Creek Springs Transmission Main project will add a pipe crossing the White River to be used for installation of a water main for Game Farm Wilderness Park. Completion of the river crossing will enable the water main project to be completed sooner and eliminate the need for pump station improvements. This project will install new main within the Game Farm Park from the existing 8" near the amphitheater to the river crossing, and from the river crossing to the existing pump station in the Wilderness area. The project will also decommission the existing pump station. Comprehensive Plan project D16. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of completion. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 122 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Meter Vault Replacement Project No:cp1807 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue 326,400 10,000 - 336,400 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds 120,101 779,899 - - 900,000 Other - - - - - 120,101 1,106,299 10,000 - 1,236,400 Capital Expenditures: Design 120,101 - - - 120,101 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 1,106,299 10,000 - 1,116,299 120,101 1,106,299 10,000 - 1,236,400 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Large meter vaults at Washington Elementary School, Cascade Middle School (2 vaults), Forest Ridge Townhomes, Green River Estates, and Neely Station have lids that are unsafe and vaults that are in need of repair. Project will replace the vaults and upgrade piping as needed. Progress Summary: Construction underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 123 WATER FUND (460)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: West Hill Springs Water Quality Improvements Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Water Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Water Revenue - 100,000 480,000 - 580,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 100,000 480,000 - 580,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 480,000 - 480,000 - 100,000 480,000 - 580,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The aging chlorination building at West Hill Springs will be replaced and a new liquid chlorination system will be installed. Additionally, aeration to adjust pH will be required. Comprehensive Plan project S-12. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to year of completion. Additional cost refinement will be needed due to the need for additional improvements not originally identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 124 TABLE W-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets WATER Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Howard Road Corrosion Control Treatment Facility Expansion -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600$ 600$ Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 600$ 600$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 125 SANITARY SEWER Current Facilities The City’s sanitary sewer service area encompasses approximately 28-square miles that are primarily within the City limits, but includes a total of approximately ½ square mile within Auburn’s Proposed Annexation area (PAA). The City contracts with King County for sewage treatment and disposal. The City’s Sanitary Sewer Utility is responsible for the collection and transmission of wastewater to the King County trunk lines. The City’s current inventory of approximately 215 miles of sewer lines serves the City’s sewer service area. Table S-1, Facilities Inventory, lists the sewage collection and transmission facilities along with their capacities and locations. Level of Service (LOS) The Comprehensive Sewerage Plan for the Sewerage Collection System summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City’s sewage collection system. These standards represent the average quantities of sewage that the system is designated to accommodate for residential, industrial, and commercial development. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Investments in the City’s sewage collection facilities include primarily non-capacity improvements and replacement projects. Anticipated projects include replacement of aging sewer pipes and manholes in conjunction with arterial and local street improvements, replacement of pipe identified through the sewer program’s condition assessment process, replacement of the Rainier Ridge Pump station, and updating the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Additionally the City will continue to monitor flow rates, primarily within the Valley Basin area to help identify specific areas of the City that show high levels of inflow and infiltration. The City of Auburn’s sewer system anticipates costs for thirteen non-capacity projects totaling $15,936,000. Table S-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for sanitary sewer facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 126 TABLE S-1 Facilities Inventory Sewage Facilities CAPACITY FACILITY (MGD)LOCATION Pump Stations: 8th Street 0.26 900 8th Street NE 22nd Street 0.79 1950 22nd Street NE Area 19 0.47 800 71st Street SE Auburn 40 0.63 4159 O Place NE Dogwood 0.43 1423 Dogwood Street SE Ellingson 2.20 100 41st Street SE F Street 0.86 1700 F Street SE Hudson 0.76 6408 S 287th Street North Tapps 0.73 2610 Lake Tapps Pkwy SE Peasley Ridge 0.36 5225 South 320th Street Promenade 0.25 12900 SE 312th Street R Street 0.14 600 R Street NE Rainier Ridge 0.29 31809 125th Place SE Riverside 0.58 13900 104th Avenue SE Terrace View 0.94 104 60th Street SE Valley Meadows 0.18 2022 4th Street SE Verdana 2.88 11807 SE 296th Place (Kent, WA) FACILITY Pipe Size LOCATION River Crossings: Inverted Syphon 8 & 12 Inch Green River & 26th Street NE 8th Street Bridge 14 Inch Green River & 8th Street NE City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 127 TABLE S-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING SANITARY SEWER DIVISION 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 129 Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement Program Capital Costs - 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 130 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 131 Vactor Decant Facility Capital Costs 180,000 - - - - - 180,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 180,000 - - - - - 180,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 132 Manhole Ring and Cover Replacement Capital Costs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 133 Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement Program Capital Costs - - 255,000 525,000 2,900,000 - 3,680,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - - 255,000 525,000 2,900,000 - 3,680,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 134 Pump Station Electrical Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 135 Inflow and Infiltration Study Capital Costs 163,000 167,000 172,000 - - - 502,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 163,000 167,000 172,000 - - - 502,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 136 Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Capital Costs 40,000 140,000 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 40,000 140,000 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 128 TABLE S-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 137 F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 138 M Street NE Widening Capital Costs - 12,000 - 112,000 - - 124,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund - 12,000 - 112,000 - - 124,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 139 Rainier Ridge Pump Station Rehabilitation/Replacement Capital Costs 450,000 2,900,000 - - - - 3,350,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 450,000 2,900,000 - - - - 3,350,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 140 2nd Street SE Preservation Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 141 2021 Sewer Repair and Replacement Capital Costs 2,100,000 - - - - - 2,100,000 Funding Sources: Sewer Fund 2,100,000 - - - - - 2,100,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 3,383,000 3,799,000 2,257,000 1,237,000 4,680,000 580,000 15,936,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 3,383,000 3,799,000 2,257,000 1,237,000 4,680,000 580,000 15,936,000 Total Costs 3,383,000 3,799,000 2,257,000 1,237,000 4,680,000 580,000 15,936,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Utility Funds (Sewer)3,383,000 3,799,000 2,257,000 1,237,000 4,680,000 580,000 15,936,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Total Funding 3,383,000 3,799,000 2,257,000 1,237,000 4,680,000 580,000 15,936,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 129 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sanitary Sewer Repair & Replacement/System Improvements Program Project No:sebd01 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 300,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 300,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 250,000 - Right of Way - - - 20,000 - Construction - - - 30,000 - - - - 300,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 150,000 250,000 150,000 250,000 1,050,000 Right of Way - 20,000 - 20,000 60,000 Construction 1,350,000 30,000 1,350,000 30,000 2,790,000 1,500,000 300,000 1,500,000 300,000 3,900,000 Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This should slightly decrease the operating budget by correcting the problems that require operation staff's attention. Repair and replace (R&R) broken sewer mains and other facilities. These lines will be identified through television inspection and routine cleaning. This program includes funding for R&R projects which have not been identified as a separate R&R project or are not associated transportation projects. Anticipated projects include bi-annual, stand-alone, repair and replacement projects for sewer lines which are broken, misaligned, "bellied" or otherwise require an inordinate amount of maintenance effort or present a risk of backup or trench failure, and facilities which generate consistent odor complaints. Additionally, system improvements which enhance the ability to maintain service are included here. Comprehensive Plan Project #1. Progress Summary: 21 Sites were identified 2017. Funds from this program were transferred to CP1805 - 2019 Sewer Repair and Replacement project which used those funds to complete four of the sites using cured in place pipe (CIPP) lining. 2020 and 2021 funds will be used to complete the remaining sites as part of project CP2010. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 130 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:sebd02 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 30,000 30,000 30,000 Right of Way - - - Construction 170,000 170,000 170,000 - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 1,020,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 1,200,000 Non Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: No significant Impact Sewer system repair and replacements in coordination with trasnportation projects. Comprehensive Plan Project #2. Progress Summary: Ongoing Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 131 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Vactor Decant Facility Project No:sebd03 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 180,000 - 180,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 180,000 - 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 180,000 - 180,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 180,000 - 180,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 180,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 180,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - 180,000 Non-Capacity (Improvements) Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the expenses associated with hauling saturated waste to the County landfill. Currently the City hauls vactored sewage waste to the County landfill on a biweekly basis. The sewage sludge is considerably wet, thus Utility funds are paying for the disposal of water. This project consists of a study/analysis to assess the City’s vactor disposal method and identify a cost-effective alternative to the status quo. Possible recommendations may include maintaining current operations, constructing a gravity decant facility, incorporating special equipment into the vactor truck to increase decanting ability, purchasing specialized dewatering machinery, or collaborating with neighboring utilities for the shared use of facilities and equipment. Comprehensive Plan Project #3. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 132 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Manhole Ring and Cover Replacement Project No:sebd04 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 8,000 8,000 8,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - 72,000 72,000 72,000 - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 48,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 432,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project could decrease the future operating budget by reducing the need for staff to respond to loose manholes or lids. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) As manholes and roads age and their condition deteriorates, access covers and the rings in which they sit can become loose and/or misaligned, and can become a road hazard requiring maintenance staff attention and increasing the City's liability. This annual project will replace approximately 50 sewer manhole rings and covers to maintain access to the sewer system and to decrease the likelihood of the manholes becoming road hazards. In some years, this replacement will be as a stand-alone project, and in some years many of these replacements will be in conjunction with other City capital projects. Comprehensive Plan Project #7. Progress Summary: Ongoing Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 133 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement Program Project No:sebd05 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 255,000 525,000 2,900,000 - 3,680,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 255,000 525,000 2,900,000 - 3,680,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 255,000 525,000 230,000 - 1,010,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - 2,670,000 - 2,670,000 255,000 525,000 2,900,000 - 3,680,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvements) Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: The Sewer Utility's infrastructure currently consists of 17 public sewer pump stations that range in age from 1 to over 50 years old. As those stations age, and utility operations change, considerations such as station condition, component condition, capacity, reliability, and safety suggest that stations be upgraded, rehabilitated, and replaced. This program fund will provide funding to meet those needs over the next six years. Comprehensive Plan Project #4. Progress Summary: Following the results of the systematic pump station evaluation study, the 2017-2022 funds for this program were divided into the Pump Station Electrical Improvements project (for common improvements at many stations) and the Pump Station Replacement project (for Rainier Ridge) As future considerations of reliability, capacity, and condition are evaluated, and specific projects are developed, these funds will be designated for those projects. In 2018, the program cost was adjusted to reflect escalation of 3% per year from 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 134 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pump Station Electrical Improvements Project No:cp1812 Project Type: Project Manager:Jeff Bender Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 29,429 1,133,055 10,000 - 1,172,484 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 29,429 1,133,055 10,000 - 1,172,484 Capital Expenditures: Design 6,692 226,656 2,000 - 235,348 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 906,399 8,000 - 914,399 6,692 1,133,055 10,000 - 1,149,747 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 2,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 8,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-capacity This project will design and construction improvements to the City's sewer pump stations' electrical systems that were identifed by the 2016 Pump Station Condition Assessment Project. The additions and modifications are intended to increase employee safety as well as operational efficiency. They include adding dry well control panel disconnects, bringing intrinsically safe wiring up to code, organizing, labelling, and dressing out control panel boxes, adding dry well HMI computer screens, creating uniform as-built wiring diagrams for each station, as well as several other modifications identified for specific stations. Funding for this project was derived from the Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement program (sebd05). Progress Summary: For reasons of efficiency in design and constructions, some elements of the design applicable to all the stations and the specific design and construction of improvements for the 22nd Street and 'R' Street Pump Stations were completed as part of CP1719. Specific design for the remainder of the project will begin in 2019, and the project will be complete in 2021. In 2018, the program cost was adjusted to reflect escalation of 3% per year from 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 135 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Inflow and Infiltration Study Project No:sebd11 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 312,000 163,000 167,000 475,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 312,000 163,000 167,000 475,000 Capital Expenditures: Design/Analysis - 312,000 163,000 167,000 475,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - 312,000 163,000 167,000 475,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 172,000 - - - 502,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 172,000 - - - 502,000 Capital Expenditures: Design/Analysis 172,000 - - - 502,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - 172,000 - - - 502,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-Capacity (Improvement) This project will assess portions of the City Sewer Service Area for infiltration/inflow (I/I) values. Excessive localized I/I can be an indicator of poor sewer main and side sewer conditions and could contribute to capacity issues in the future. This project will monitor flow in the collection system over several years. This data will then be used to help identify repair and replacement needs, modeling purposes, and for I/I assessment in future updates to the Comprehensive Sewer Plan. Comprehensive Plan Project #9. Progress Summary: In 2018, the program cost was adjusted to reflect escalation of 3% per year from 2014. Initial flow monitors were installed in May, 2020 with additional monitors to be added in September/October, 2020. Monitoring locations in future years will be determined based on the results of the initial phase of monitoring. The next two years of data collection coincides with King County's flow monitoring program which will allow the data to be shared and correlated. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 136 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Sewer Plan Update Project No:sebd12 Project Type: Project Manager:Bob Elwell Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement/Improvement) This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. This project will prepare an update to the City's Sewer Comprehensive Plan to be adopted by City Council as part of the City's overall Comprehensive Plan to be completed by June 2024. City staff will prepare portions of the plan and will engage consultants to complete some of the tasks including hydraulic modeling, financial analysis, and cost estimation. Comprehensive Plan Project #10. Progress Summary: The deadline for completion of the City's Comprehensive Plan has been extended from June 2023 to June 2024. Preliminary project planning underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 137 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: F Street SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:cp1416 Project Type: Project Manager:Seth Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue 14,463 163,200 10,000 - 187,663 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 14,463 163,200 10,000 - 187,663 Capital Expenditures: Design 14,463 5,000 8,000 27,463 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - 158,200 2,000 - 160,200 14,463 163,200 10,000 - 187,663 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 8,000 Right of Way/Property Acquisition - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project saves money and avoids damage to the new roadway that could occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure of blockage. Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Replace approximately 420 LF of 15"-18" diameter clay pipe as part of the City's transportation project: F Street SE Non- Motorized Improvements project. Constructing this project in association with a road improvement project reduces costs and avoids damage to the new roadway that would occur if the pipe was not replaced and experienced a failure or blockage. Progress Summary: Project construction underway in 2020. Funds shown in 2021 are a placeholder for a potential 2020 project budget carryforward. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 138 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M Street NE Widening Project No:sebd08 Project Type: Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - 12,000 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 12,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 12,000 12,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 12,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 112,000 - - 124,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 112,000 - - 124,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 12,000 - - 24,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 100,000 - - 100,000 - 112,000 - - 124,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: No significant Impact Non-Capacity Replace approximately 170 LF of 12" and 20 LF of 8" vitrified clay sewer line in M St NE between Main Street and 1st St NE and replace approximately 100 LF of 8" PVC between 2nd and 3rd Street NE to repair a belly at the downstream end of the pipe in conjunction with street improvements. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 139 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Rainier Ridge Pump Station Rehabilitation/Replacement Project No:cp2009 Project Type: Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 65,000 450,000 2,900,000 515,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 65,000 450,000 2,900,000 515,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 65,000 450,000 220,000 515,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,680,000 - - 65,000 450,000 2,900,000 515,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 3,350,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 3,350,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 670,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,680,000 - - - - 3,350,000 This project will not have a significant effect on operating budget. Non-capacity The Rainer Ridge Pump Station was constructed in 1980. Most of the property within its tributary basin has been fully developed, and the station has very little excess capacity. As such, there is a very short response time in the event of a pump failure, especially during peak use. Additionally, the PVC force main has had several breaks, and should be replaced. The initial phase of this project will examine the alternatives of rehabilitating the station, replacing major components, or replacing the entire station. The proposed funding assumes a complete replacement, and will be adjusted pending the alternatives analysis. Funding for this project was derived from the Sewer Pump Station Replacement/Improvement program (sebd05). Progress Summary: The 2016 Pump Station Evaluation project identified both the 22nd Street and Rainier Ridge Pump Stations to be rehabilitated or replaced. While 22nd Street was initially considered the more critical of the two, several improvements have been made to that station which has increased its useful life, so rehabilitation/replacement of Rainier Ridge became the more critical task. In 2018, the program cost was adjusted to reflect escalation of 3% per year from 2017. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 140 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2nd Street SE Preservation Project No:CP2003 Project Type: Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 30,000 150,000 - 180,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 30,000 150,000 - 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 30,000 10,000 - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 140,000 - 140,000 - 30,000 150,000 - 180,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 150,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 140,000 - - - - 150,000 No significant impact Non-capacity This project replaces approximately 450 LF of 8” concrete sewer line with 8” PVC and replaces 2 manholes as part of a street reconstruction project for 2nd Street SE between A Street SE and Auburn Way South. Progress Summary: City was awarded transportation grant funding in 2019 and the project design began in 2020. Sewer funds for this project will be transferred from sebd02 (2020), with a $30,000 in-fund transfer, and $150,000 "rebudgeting" in 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 141 SEWER FUND (461)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2021 Sewer Repair and Replacement Project No:CP2010 Project Type: Project Manager:Jai Carter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - 300,000 2,100,000 - 2,400,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 300,000 2,100,000 - 2,400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 300,000 100,000 - 400,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - 300,000 2,100,000 - 2,400,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Sewer Revenue - - - - 2,100,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 2,100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 2,000,000 - - - - 2,100,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project should slightly decrease the operating budget by correcting the problems that require operation staff's attention. Non-capacity This project is a continuation of the 2019 Sewer R&R project (CP1805), and proposes to complete the design and construction of the repairs not completed during the construction phase of that project and to add three new sites. This project plans to replace a total of approximately 2585 LF of 8”-10” diameter sewer line at 9 separate sites, and to complete 10 spot repairs. Progress Summary: Project design began in 2020. The 2021 budget for project has been increased by $600,000 over the previously programmed $1,500,000 based on unspent funds budgeted in 2020 for project CP1805. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 142 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 143 STORM DRAINAGE Current Facilities The City’s storm drainage service area encompasses the municipal boundaries of the City. For management purposes, the service area is divided into 59 drainage sub-basins. The City’s drainage system consists of a combination of closed conveyance pipes and open ditch conveyance facilities, with seven pumping stations. Table SD-1 Facilities Inventory lists the facilities along with their current capacities and location. Level of Service (LOS) The City’s Comprehensive Drainage Plan summarizes the level of service (LOS), or design criteria, for the City’s storm drainage system. Generally, these standards represent a 25- year/24-hour design storm capacity within the 59 drainage sub-basins. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s storm drainage facilities anticipate one capacity project in the amount of $208,100 and twenty non-capacity projects totaling $21,097,000 for a six-year planning expectation total of $21,305,100. Table SD-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for storm drainage facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 144 TABLE SD-1 Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION Drainage Basins: A 562 38,226 1,440 See City of Auburn's AA 410 17,179 3,479 Comprehensive Drainage AAA 296 3,031 5,187 Plan, Dec. 2015 AZ 779 70,921 18,314 B 865 104,655 0 BB 15 1,626 0 BBB 73 0 0 C 836 91,901 5,842 CC 242 2,595 0 CCC 986 72,192 18,492 D 168 20,973 177 DD 231 30 0 DDD 63 4,047 0 E 726 59,724 8,478 EE 563 3,611 0 F 83 9,731 0 FF 361 2,719 1358 G 134 20,090 0 GG 226 4,923 413 H 561 43,362 614 HH 392 0 0 I 238 28,161 3,081 II 305 0 0 J 255 5,096 1,571 JJ 1,185 36,581 3,177 K 268 14,715 22 KK 391 0 0 L 87 14,483 3,747 LL 198 117 2,586 LS 1,138 78,592 13,392 M 547 39,958 6,796 MM 332 1,949 184 N 128 10,582 0 NN 562 11,913 6,058 NNN 175 2,717 705 O 176 19,431 2,368 OO 1,397 51,884 17,648 P 189 8,161 1,368 PP 110 1,459 0 PPP 161 3,863 2,091 QQ 334 13,313 3,777 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 145 TABLE SD-1 (continued) Facilities Inventory Storm Drainage Facilities Feet of Feet of FACILITY Acres Pipeline Open Channels LOCATION R 55 7,221 0 RR 249 12,038 673 S 287 17,121 2,227 SS 333 20,929 2,140 T 698 94,609 4,026 TT 137 2,076 1,254 U 365 10,934 0 UU 456 20,304 3,430 V 662 38,491 7,182 W 289 37,158 5,041 WC 101 10,099 0 WW 71 1,176 1,708 X 40 3,616 0 YY 326 20,244 3,756 YYY 105 155 639 Z 70 9,678 0 ZZ 935 59,355 19,262 ZZZ 238 0 0 Total 22,165 1,279,715 183,703 FACILITY (GPM)LOCATION Pump Stations: Brannan Park Pump Station #4 20,200 Brannan Park White River Pump Station 17,700 5000 block A Street SE Emerald Corp. Park Pump Station 6,500 C Street NE near 42nd Street M St SE Grade Separation 1,500 328 M St SE A Street SE Pump Station 1,380 A Street SE near SR-18 and BNRR overpass West Main Street Pump Station 1,200 1420 West Main Street Auburn Way S Pump Station #3 1,000 Auburn Way S near SR-18 and BNRR overpass CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 146 TABLE SD-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING STORM DRAINAGE DIVISION 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 149 37th St. NW Storm Improvement Capital Costs 208,100 - - - - - 208,100 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 26,130 - - - - - 26,130 King Co. Opportunity Fund 181,970 - - - - - 181,970 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 208,100 - - - - - 208,100 Non-Capacity Projects: 150 Pipeline Repair & Replacement Program Capital Costs 324,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 3,199,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 324,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 3,199,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 151 2021 Storm Renewal & Replacement Project Capital Costs 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 926,000 - - - - - 926,000 Pierce Co. Opportunity Fund 74,000 - - - - - 74,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 152 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 3 Capital Costs - - - - 673,000 2,244,000 2,917,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - - - 673,000 2,244,000 2,917,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 153 Street Utility Improvements Capital Costs 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 154 2021 Local Street Preservation - G Street SE and Riverwalk/Forest Ridge Capital Costs 440,000 - - - - - 440,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 440,000 - - - - - 440,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 155 AWN Preservation Project Phase 3 Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 147 TABLE SD-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 156 Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update Capital Costs 40,000 140,000 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 40,000 140,000 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 157 Vegetation Sorting Facility Capital Costs 902,000 - - - - - 902,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 902,000 - - - - - 902,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 158 Auburn Municipal Airport Runway Enhancements Capital Costs 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 10,000 - - - - - 10,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 159 North Airport Area Improvements Capital Costs 175,000 1,100,000 - - - - 1,275,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 175,000 1,100,000 - - - - 1,275,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 160 D St. SE Storm Improvement Capital Costs 508,000 1,742,000 - - - - 2,250,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 508,000 1,742,000 - - - - 2,250,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 161 S. 330th St. & 46th Pl. S. Storm Improvement Capital Costs 294,000 - - - - - 294,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 294,000 - - - - - 294,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 162 23rd Street SE Storm Improvement Capital Costs 174,000 596,000 - - - - 770,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 174,000 596,000 - - - - 770,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 163 Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Capital Costs 68,000 454,000 - - - - 522,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 68,000 454,000 - - - - 522,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 164 S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 1 Capital Costs - 102,000 416,000 - - - 518,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 102,000 416,000 - - - 518,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 148 TABLE SD-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 165 S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 2 Capital Costs - - 115,000 281,000 - - 396,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 115,000 281,000 - - 396,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 166 M Street NE Widening Capital Costs - 50,000 - 350,000 - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - 50,000 - 350,000 - - 400,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 167 West Main Street Pump Station Upgrade Capital Costs - - 850,000 2,914,000 - - 3,764,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund - - 850,000 2,514,000 - - 3,364,000 King Co. Opportunity Fund - - - 400,000 - - 400,000 168 Manhole & Catchbasin Frame and Grate Replacement Capital Costs 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - 169 Auburn Way North and 1st St NE Signal Replacement Capital Costs 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: Storm Fund 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 4,475,000 4,639,000 3,011,000 4,020,000 2,253,000 2,699,000 21,097,000 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 208,100 - - - - - 208,100 Non-Capacity Projects 4,475,000 4,639,000 3,011,000 4,020,000 2,253,000 2,699,000 21,097,000 Total Costs 4,683,100 4,639,000 3,011,000 4,020,000 2,253,000 2,699,000 21,305,100 FUNDING SOURCES: Storm Fund 4,427,130 4,639,000 3,011,000 3,620,000 2,253,000 2,699,000 20,649,130 King Co. Opportunity Fund 181,970 - - 400,000 - - 581,970 Pierce Co. Opportunity Fund 74,000 - - - - - 74,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - Total Funding 4,683,100 4,639,000 3,011,000 4,020,000 2,253,000 2,699,000 21,305,100 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 149 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:37th St. NW Storm Improvement Project No:cp1724 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 7,845 30,000 26,130 - 63,975 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - King County Opportunity Grant 28,035 - 181,970 - 210,005 35,880 30,000 208,100 - 273,980 Capital Expenditures: Design 35,880 30,000 - - 65,880 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 208,100 - 208,100 35,880 30,000 208,100 - 273,980 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 26,130 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - King County Opportunity Grant - - - - 181,970 - - - - 208,100 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 208,100 - - - - 208,100 Grants / Other Sources: King County Opportunity Grant This project will replace the damaged and eroded existing pipes spanning the PSE substation access driveway in vicinity of 37th ST. NE near I St NW. During periods of prolonged heavy flows, this side channel to Mill Creek exceeds the capacity of the combined culverts and backs up onto 37th St. NW and also impacts the Interurban Trail. Comprehensive Plan Project #2 Progress Summary: The city has been awarded a $210,000 King County Opportunity Grant. Hydraulic modeling and preliminary culvert design and initial meetings with the permitting agencies have been completed. Coordination with PSE is ongoing to establish the available location of the culvert spanning the substation driveway. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 150 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Pipeline Repair & Replacement Program Project No:sdbd03 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 942,092 - 324,000 125,000 1,266,092 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 942,092 - 324,000 125,000 1,266,092 Capital Expenditures: Design 187,891 - - 125,000 187,891 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 754,201 - 324,000 - 1,078,201 942,092 - 324,000 125,000 1,266,092 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 1,250,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 3,199,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 1,250,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 3,199,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 125,000 - 125,000 375,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 1,250,000 - 1,250,000 - 2,824,000 1,250,000 125,000 1,250,000 125,000 3,199,000 This program provides funding for projects involving replacement of existing infrastructure. These projects support street repairs and other utility replacement programs, requiring coordination. This program recently funded the 2018 Storm Repair & Replacement Project (cp1823). Comprehensive Plan Project #1. Progress Summary: Construction of project CP1823 underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Repair and replacement of aging infrastructure should reduce operating costs. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 151 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:2021 Storm Renewal & Replacement Project Project No:cp2017 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Luis Barba Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 100,000 926,000 - 1,026,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Pierce County FCZD Opportunity Fund - - 74,000 - 74,000 - 100,000 1,000,000 - 1,100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 100,000 - - 100,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 - 100,000 1,000,000 - 1,100,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 926,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Pierce County FCZD Opportunity Fund - - - - 74,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,000,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Lower maintenance costs due to reducing stormwater runoff onto roadways and sidewalks. This project will provide improvements to the existing storm drainage system to eliminate known drainage issues and reduce maintenance at six sites: Eastpoint Storm Pond, Mountain View Cemetery, SE 304th Street at 108th Ave SE, A St NE near 7th St NE, S 316th Street near 55th Ave S, and south side of Mill Pond Drive near Oravetz Rd. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 152 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 30th Street NE Area Flooding, Phase 3 Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 673,000 2,244,000 2,917,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 673,000 2,244,000 2,917,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 673,000 - 673,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,244,000 2,244,000 - - 673,000 2,244,000 2,917,000 This project will reduce potential flooding in C St. NE by redirecting wet weather high flows southward to the 42-inch diameter (Phase 1) storm drain in 30th St. NE. By redirecting the C St. NE drainage into the Brannan Park system, these flows would no longer be affected by high water levels in Mill Creek. To avoid deepening the Phase 1 gravity line (and extensive retrofits to the Brannan Park pump station), this project would include a wet weather pump station and force main connection to 30th St. NE. The upgraded 42-inch diameter pipe in 30th St. NE would have sufficient capacity for these additional flows. Key components of Phase 3 include: Wet weather pump station (estimated capacity of 4.5 to 7 cfs), 1,730 feet of 15-inch diameter force main; Diversion structure in C St. NE for pump station. Comprehensive Plan Project #4B. Progress Summary: This project was moved from 2023-2024 to 2024-2025 to balance storn funding requirements throughout the capital facilities plan. In 2020, the program cost was adjusted to reflect escalation of 3% per year from 2015. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Impacts are expected to increase due to high level of maintenance required for pump stations. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 153 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Street Utility Improvements Project No:sdbd04 Project Type:Non Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: Previous 2 years 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue 200,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 470,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 200,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 470,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 200,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 470,000 200,000 20,000 250,000 250,000 470,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 1,500,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Storm system repair and replacements in coordination with trasnportation projects. Comprehensive Plan Project #12. Progress Summary: In 2020, this program is funding the AWN Preservation Project Phase 3 (cp1904). Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 154 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: 2021 Local Street Preservation - G Street SE and Riverwalk/Forest Ridge Project No:cp2019 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Troung Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 60,000 440,000 - 500,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 60,000 440,000 - 500,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 60,000 - - 60,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 440,000 - 440,000 - 60,000 440,000 - 500,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 440,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 440,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 440,000 - - - - 440,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This improvement will replace undersized and deteriorated storm line with the street project. Approximately 1150 feet of 12" storm line with catchbasins and manholes will be constructed. Progress Summary: Conceptual level design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Repair and replacement of aging infrastructure should reduce operating costs. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 155 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: AWN Preservation Project Phase 3 Project No:cp1904 Project Type:Non Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: Previous 2 years 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 190,000 10,000 - 200,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 190,000 10,000 - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 190,000 10,000 - 200,000 - 190,000 10,000 - 200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This improvement will construct storm improvements with transportation project CP1904 - AWN Preservation Project Phase 3, including eliminating cross connection(s) and installing new pipe and manhole(s). Progress Summary: Funding from Street Utility Improvements Program sdbd04 ($90,000) and from Drainage Assessment Program sdbd07 ($100,000). Project construction underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant Impact. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 156 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Comprehensive Storm Drainage Plan Update Project No:sdbd16 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Tim Carlaw Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 40,000 140,000 40,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 50,000 20,000 - - 250,000 None This project will prepare an update to the City's Storm Drainage Comprehensive Plan to be adopted by City Council as part of the City's overall Comprehensive Plan to be completed by June 2024. City staff will prepare portions of the plan and will engage consultants to complete some of the tasks including hydraulic modeling, financial analysis, and cost estimation. Comprehensive Plan Project #9. Progress Summary: In 2018, the project costs were escalated an average of 3% per year from 2015 to the year of completion.The deadline for completion of the City's Comprehensive Plan has been extended from June 2023 to June 2024. Preliminary project planning underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 157 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Vegetation Sorting Facility Project No:sdbd12 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 64,000 902,000 - 966,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 64,000 902,000 - 966,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 64,000 64,000 - 128,000 Right of Way - - 750,000 - 750,000 Construction/Equipment - - 88,000 - 88,000 - 64,000 902,000 - 966,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 902,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 902,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 64,000 Right of Way - - - - 750,000 Construction/Equipment - - - - 88,000 - - - - 902,000 This project will prepare an evaluation of the benefits and costs of acquiring property to use as a vegetation sorting facility prior to disposal or reuse of materials from storm drainage maintenance activities (e.g., pond and ditch cleaning). The evaluation will identify potential use of a sorting facility by other City departments and by neighboring jurisdictions as a regional facility. If evaluation shows a reasonable benefit/cost ratio, the project implementation proceed with property acquisition and site improvements to construct the vegetation sorting facility. Cost includes bin barriers and sorting equipment to facilitate materials handling and separation. Comprehensive Plan Project #10. Progress Summary: In 2018, the project costs were escalated an average of 3% per year from 2015 to the year of completion.Preliminary project scoping underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Overall operating costs should decrease as a result of improved efficiency from the sorting facility. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 158 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Auburn Municipal Airport Runway Enhancements Project No:cp1516 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Wickstrom Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 127,500 10,000 - 137,500 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 127,500 10,000 - 137,500 Capital Expenditures: Design - 12,500 - - 12,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 115,000 10,000 - 125,000 - 127,500 10,000 - 137,500 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 10,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 10,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 10,000 - - - - 10,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Comprehensive Plan Project #6 includes excavating additional storage capacity in Pond I, replacing the existing inlet pipe to Pond I at a lower elevation to direct additional flow into Pond I, and installing a backflow preventer at the outlet from the pond. Subsequent storm modeling has indicated that excess storage exists within the 4 open ponds at the airport but requires a larger inlet pipe to deliver greater flows into the ponds to maximize the storage. The scope of the project has been revised to include installation of 150 feet of 30" storm pipe to improve the inlet into Pond I, and 390 feet of 15" storm pipe to direct flows from the north hanger area into Pond I. The new underground stormwater detention system is being constructed as part of, and funded by, the runway extension. Progress Summary: Project construction underway in 2020 as a change order for with project CP1516 - Airport Runway Enhancements. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 159 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:North Airport Area Improvements Project No:sdbd10 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 175,000 1,100,000 175,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 175,000 1,100,000 175,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 175,000 - 175,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,100,000 - - - 175,000 1,100,000 175,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 1,275,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 1,275,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 175,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,100,000 - - - - 1,275,000 This project will eliminate Pond F and underground Pond G within subsurface chambers. Storm modeling for the north auburn airport area has determined that overall storage capacity is sufficient and will eliminate the existing bird netting and vegetation management for these two ponds. Progress Summary: The scope of this project has been revised to include the undergrounding of a portion of the open detention storage ponds at the Airport. The origional project which included replacing the existing inlet pipe to Pond I at a lower elevation to capture additional flow is being constructed with a change order for CP1516 and will be completed in 2020. This will reduce the potential for flooding occurence in this area. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Eliminating Pond F and undergrounding Pond G will significantly reduce the costs to maintain the bird netting and vegetation management within the ponds. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 160 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:D St. SE Storm Improvement Project No:sdbd18 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 508,000 1,742,000 508,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 508,000 1,742,000 508,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 508,000 - 508,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,742,000 - - - 508,000 1,742,000 508,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 2,250,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 2,250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 508,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,742,000 - - - - 2,250,000 This project will Install approximately 990 L.F. 30-inch, 630 L.F. 24-inch and 1230 L.F. 12-inch of new gravity storm drain pipe to convey the 25-year flow along D Street SE from a flooding area that caused by failing dry wells located near the intersection of D Street SE and 25th Street SE. Additionally, the project will install approximately 380 LF 12-inch gravity storm drain pipe in F Street SE from 27th to 26th Street SE to complete a missing line connection. Both of these systems direct flows to the existing 21st Street storm pond. Comprehensive Plan Project #7. Progress Summary: in 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Operating expenses are expected to decrease with the elimination of existing drywells. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 161 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 330th St. & 46th Pl. S. Storm Improvement Project No:cp2018 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 85,000 294,000 - 379,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 85,000 294,000 - 379,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 70,000 - 70,000 Easement - 15,000 - - 15,000 Construction - - 294,000 - 294,000 - 85,000 294,000 - 379,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 294,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 294,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Easement - - - - - Construction - - - - 294,000 - - - - 294,000 As part of the City's efforts to improve the drainage system in the West Hill annexation area, this project construct improvements near S. 330th Street and 46th Place S. where public storm drainage currently discharges within a large open ditch. The improvement will re-route the drainage within the right-of-way to the existing outfall. Comprehensive Plan Project #5A. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 162 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:23rd Street SE Storm Improvement Project No:sdbd17 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 174,000 596,000 174,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 174,000 596,000 174,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 174,000 - 174,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 596,000 - - - 174,000 596,000 174,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 770,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 770,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 174,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 596,000 - - - - 770,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will improve existing drainage conditions in vicinity of 23rd St. SE & K St. SE. Phase 1 includes installation of 600 LF of 15-inch line along K St. SE from 23rd St. SE to 21st St. SE to alleviate flooding associated with the pedestrian entrance to Pioneer Elementary School. Phase 2 includes installation of 560 LF of 18-inch line along 23rd St. SE from F St. SE to K St. SE. to convey flows to the F St. SE trunkline for discharge into the 21st St. SE regional infiltration facility. Phases 1 and 2 will be constructed simultaneously. Comprehensive Plan Project #8 (Phase 1+2). Progress Summary: In 2020, the project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. In 2020, the project implementation has been moved from 2020 to 2021 to coordinate with the redevelopment of Pioneer Elementary School. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 163 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Riverwalk Drive SE Non-Motorized Improvements Project No:sdbd14 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 68,000 454,000 68,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 68,000 454,000 68,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 68,000 - 68,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 454,000 - - - 68,000 454,000 68,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 522,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 522,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 68,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 454,000 - - - - 522,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will construct large diameter storm piping to replace the existing roadside ditch, and expand the Riverwalk ponds to accommodate increased capacity due to the lost infiltration of the upstream ditch along Riverwalk Drive. The project will be implemented as part of the transportation project that will construct sidewalks along the east side of Riverwalk Drive SE from Howard Road and Auburn Way South. Progress Summary: In 2020, the City applied Grant funding for the transportation portion of the project (sidewalks) and the City continues working with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to establish partnership and potential funding. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Maintenance costs should decrease as a result of the project. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 164 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 1 Project No:sdbd19 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - 102,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 102,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 102,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 102,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 416,000 - - - 518,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 416,000 - - - 518,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 102,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 416,000 - - - 416,000 416,000 - - - 518,000 As part of the City's efforts to improve the drainage system in the West Hill annexation area, this project will construct improvements near S. 314th Street. and 54th Avenue S. to redirect flows and implement Low Impact Development (LIID) techniques. Comprehensive Project #5B Phase 1. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 165 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:S. 314th St. & 54th Ave S. Storm Improvement Ph. 2 Project No:cpXXXX Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 115,000 281,000 - - 396,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 115,000 281,000 - - 396,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 89,000 - - - 89,000 Right of Way 26,000 - - - 26,000 Construction - 281,000 - - 281,000 115,000 281,000 - - 396,000 As part of the City's efforts to improve the drainage system in the West Hill annexation area, this project will construct near. S 314th Street and 54th Avenue S. to route the public storm drainage through a new easement and pipe to the downstream system. Comprehensive Drainage Plan Project #5B Phase 2. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 166 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:M Street NE Widening Project No:sdbd20 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - 50,000 - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 50,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 350,000 - - 400,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - 350,000 - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 350,000 - - 350,000 - 350,000 - - 400,000 None This project will construction replace approximately 450 L.F. of undersized and deteriorated storm drain pipe and install approximatey 300 feet of new storm drain pipe with catch basins and manholes storm line. The project will be implemented as part of the transportation project: M Street NE Widening from E. Main Street to 4th Street NE. Progress Summary: Project scope developed in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 167 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:West Main Street Pump Station Upgrade Project No:sdbd11 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2020 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 850,000 2,514,000 - - 3,364,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - King County Opportunity Fund - 400,000 - - 400,000 850,000 2,914,000 - - 3,764,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 850,000 - - - 850,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 2,914,000 - - 2,914,000 850,000 2,914,000 - - 3,764,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will upgrade the existing pump station by providing a redundant pump, force main, and outlet to meet level of service goals. Comprehensive Plan Project #1. Progress Summary: In 2018, project costs were escalated at 3% per year from 2015 to the year of construction. In 2020, project implementation was moved from 2022-2023 to 2023-2024 for balance funding in the capital facilities plan period. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 168 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Manhole & Catchbasin Frame and Grate Replacement Project No:sdbd21 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Repair and Replacement) Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 8,000 8,000 8,000 Right of Way - - - - Construction - 72,000 72,000 72,000 - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 48,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 72,000 72,000 72,000 72,000 432,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 480,000 Reduced risk of road hazard claims. As manholes & catchbasins age and their condition deteriorates, frame and grates can become loose and/or misoriented, or due to age are not meeting standards. This annual project will replace approximately 50 storm manhole and catchbasin frame and grates to maintain access to the storm system and to decrease the likelihood of the manholes becoming road hazards. In some years, this replacement will be as a stand-alone project, and in some years many of these replacements will be in conjunction with other City capital projects. Progress Summary: New program Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 169 STORM DRAINAGE FUND (462)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title:Auburn Way North and 1st St NE Signal Replacement Project No:cp1927 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Koshman Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Storm Revenue - 200,000 - 200,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 200,000 - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - Construction - 200,000 - 200,000 - - 200,000 - 200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Storm Revenue - - - - 200,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 200,000 - - - - 200,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project addresses an existing storm-to-sanitary sewer cross connection(s) at the intersection of Auburn Way North and 1st Street SE with installation of new 12" storm pipes and manholes. The project is being implement with the transportation project that is replacing the traffic signal and curb ramps at the intersection. Progress Summary: Project design underway in 2020. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 170 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 171 PARKS, ARTS AND RECREATION Current Facilities The City of Auburn’s park system consists of a total of 953.39 acres of neighborhood and community parks, special use areas, open space and linear parks (trails). Table PR – 1 “Facilities Inventory” lists all park and recreation land in the City’s park system along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS provided by the City’s park system represents the existing inventory of City- owned park acres divided by the 2021 projected City population of 83,005. This equates to 0.78 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 2.83 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.20 acres for linear parks, 4.61 acres for open space, and 3.06 acres for special use areas. The proposed LOS provided by the City’s park system represents the planned 2026 inventory of City-owned park acres divided by the 2026 projected City population of 87,239. This equates to 0.85 acres per 1,000 population for neighborhood parks, 3.20 acres per 1,000 population for community parks, 0.23 acres per 1,000 population for linear parks, 4.44 acres per 1,000 population for open space, and 2.92 acres per 1,000 population for special use areas. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing Parks and Recreation facilities include eleven capacity projects at a cost of $12,843,850 and five non-capacity projects totaling $740,000 for a 6-year planning total of $13,583,850. Table PR – 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table PR – 3 shows, operating budget impacts of $103,000 are forecasted for parks and recreation facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 172 TABLE PR-1 Facilities Inventory Parks, Arts and Recreation, Land CAPACITY FACILITY (Acres)LOCATION Neighborhood Parks: Existing Inventory: 21st Street Playground 0.17 405 21st St. SE Auburndale Park 9.74 31802 108th Ave. SE Ballard Park 0.68 1612 37th Way SE Cameron Park 3.85 3727 Lemon Tree Lane Cedar Lane Park 8.36 1002 25th St. SE Dorothy Bothell Park 4.35 1087 Evergreen Way SE Dykstra Park 1.67 1487 22nd St. NE Forest Villa mini-park 0.21 1647 Fir St. SE Gaines Park 1.33 1008 Pike St. NW Indian Tom Park 0.42 1316 6th St. NE Jornada Park 1.89 1433 U Ct. NW Kersey 3 Park A 2.73 5480 Charlotte Ave. SE Kersey 3 Park B 0.79 5530 Udall Ave. SE Lakeland Hills Park 5.06 1401 Evergreen Way SE Lea Hill Courts 1.18 32121 105th Pl. SE Lewis Lake Nature Park 9.25 32054 58th Ave. S Riversands Park 1.76 5014 Pike St NE Rotary Park 3.89 2635 Alpine St. NE Scootie Brown Park 1.68 1403 Henry Rd. NE Shaughnessy Park 3.46 3302 21st St. SE Terminal Park 1.22 1292 C St. SE Village Square 1.10 12111 SE 310th St. Total Neighborhood Parks 64.79 Proposed Capacity Projects: Auburndale II Park 9.35 29700 118th Street SE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 9.35 2026 Projected Inventory Total - Neighborhood Parks -74.14 Community Parks: Existing Inventory: Brannan Park 21.68 1019 28th St. NE Fulmer Field 5.04 1101 5th St. NE Game Farm Park 57.20 3030 R St. SE Game Farm Wilderness Park 48.50 2407 Stuck River Dr. SE GSA Park 5.31 413 15th St. SW Isaac Evans Park 19.87 29627 Green River Road NE Lea Hill Park 5.26 31693 124th Ave. SE Les Gove Park 26.07 910 9th St. SE Mill Pond 4.20 4582 Mill Pond Dr, SE Roegner Park 19.22 601 Oravetz Road Sunset Park 15.15 1420 69th St SE Veteran's Memorial Park 7.67 405 E St. NE Total Community Parks 235.17 Proposed Capacity Projects: 104th Avenue SE 14.73 31495 104th Ave. SE Jacobson Tree Farm 29.30 29387 132nd Ave SE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 44.03 2026 Projected Inventory Total - Community Parks -279.20 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 173 TABLE PR-1 (continued) Linear Parks: Existing Inventory: Interurban Trail 9.14 804 West Main St. Lake Tapps Parkway Trail 2.36 1420 69th St SE Lakeland Hills Trail 1.66 1087 Evergreen Way SE Reddington Levee Trail 2.50 1019 28th St NE White River Trail 0.93 601 Oravetz St. NE Total Linear Parks 16.59 Proposed Capacity Projects: Green River Trail 0.83 277th to Reddington Levee Trail Jacobsen Tree Farm to Green River Trail 2.75 White River Trail Extension 0.05 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 3.63 2026 Projected Inventory Total - Linear Parks -20.22 Special Use Areas: Existing Inventory: Auburn Environmental Park 16.84 413 Western Ave NW B Street Plaza 0.10 148 East Main St. Bicentennial Park 1.07 502 Auburn Way S. Centennial Viewpoint Park 0.70 402 Mountain View Dr. City Hall Plaza 1.10 25 West Main St. Clark Plaza 0.25 1420 Auburn Way N. Community Garden A 1.04 1030 8th St. NE Fenster/Green River Access 12.58 10502 Auburn Black Diamond Road Golf Course 139.71 29630 Green River Road SE Mountain View Cemetery 60.00 2020 Mountain View Dr. Olson Canyon Farmstead 20.00 28728 Green River Road Pioneer Cemetery 0.76 802 Auburn Way N, Plaza Park 0.19 2 West Main St. Slaughter Memorial 0.02 2988 Auburn Way N. Total Special Use Areas 254.36 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2026 Projected Inventory Total - Special Use Areas -254.36 Open Space Areas: Existing Inventory: Auburn Environmental Park Open Space 190.91 413 Western Ave. NW Clark Property 26.68 TBD Game Farm Open Space 26.00 3030 R St. SE Golf Course Open Space 40.98 29630 Green River Road SE Lakeland Hills Nature Area 46.07 500 182nd Ave. S Olson Canyon Open Space 47.00 28728 Green River Road Qares Property 0.99 TBD Riverpoint Open Space 3.85 1450 32nd St. NE Total Open Space Areas 382.48 Proposed Capacity Projects: West Hill Park Open Space 5.00 TBD Total Proposed Capacity Projects 5.00 2026 Projected Inventory Total - Open Space Areas -387.48 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 174 TABLE PR-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING PARKS, ARTS and RECREATION (Municipal Parks Construction Fund) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 177 Park Acquisitions/Development Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - - - KC Prop 2 30,000 30,000 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 178 Jacobsen Tree Farm Development Capital Costs - 3,415,050 - - 5,000,000 - 8,415,050 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 500,000 - - 1,000,000 - 1,500,000 KC Prop 2 - 333,500 - - - - 333,500 Other (TBD)- - - - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 Park Impact Fees - 2,581,550 - - 2,000,000 - 4,581,550 179 West Hill Park Acquisition Capital Costs 800,000 - - - - - 800,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)400,000 - - - - - 400,000 Park Impact Fees 400,000 - - - - - 400,000 180 Game Farm Park Improvements Capital Costs 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Park Mitigation Fees - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 1 1,000,000 - - - - - 1,000,000 Park Impact Fees - - - - - - - 181 Auburndale Park Capital Costs 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - - - - - - Park Impact Fees 100,000 - - - - - 100,000 182 Auburndale Park II Capital Costs - - 575,000 - - - 575,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - Other - - 575,000 - - - 575,000 183 Sunset Park Improvements Capital Costs 177,800 - - - - - 177,800 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Park Impact Fees 177,800 - - - - - 177,800 Other (Contributions)- - - - - - - 184 Cedar Lanes Bike Park Capital Costs 341,000 - - - - - 341,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)118,000 - - 118,000 Park Impact Fees 223,000 - - - - - 223,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 175 TABLE PR-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 185 BPA Trail on Lea Hill Capital Costs - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 150,000 - - - 150,000 KC Prop 2 - - - - - - - 186 Lakeland Hills Nature Area Capital Costs - - 25,000 - 75,000 100,000 200,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Park Mitigation Fees - - - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - 25,000 - 75,000 100,000 200,000 187 Miscellaneous Parks Improvements Capital Costs 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - - - Park Impact Fees 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 2,548,800 3,545,050 900,000 225,000 5,300,000 325,000 12,843,850 Page Non-Capacity Projects: 188 Cameron Park Capital Costs - - 55,000 - 55,000 - 110,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - 55,000 - 55,000 - 110,000 Other - - - - - - - 189 Fulmer Park Playground Replacement Capital Costs - 150,000 - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Private)- 50,000 - - - - 50,000 KC Prop 2 - 100,000 - - - - 100,000 190 Lea Hill Mini Soccer Field Turf Replacement Capital Costs 50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)50,000 - - - - - 50,000 Other - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 176 TABLE PR-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 191 Fairway Drainage Improvement Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 192 Community Center Parking Lot Improvements Capital Costs 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - - - REET 1 250,000 - - - - - 250,000 Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 330,000 180,000 85,000 30,000 85,000 30,000 740,000 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 2,548,800 3,545,050 900,000 225,000 5,300,000 325,000 12,843,850 Non-Capacity Projects 330,000 180,000 85,000 30,000 85,000 30,000 740,000 Total Costs 2,878,800 3,725,050 985,000 255,000 5,385,000 355,000 13,583,850 FUNDING SOURCES: Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)568,000 500,000 205,000 - 1,055,000 - 2,328,000 Grants -Private - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 KC Prop 2 30,000 463,500 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 918,500 Parks Impact 950,800 2,631,550 75,000 50,000 2,125,000 150,000 5,982,350 Parks Mitigation - - - - - - - REET 1 1,250,000 - - - - - 1,250,000 REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Other - - 575,000 - 2,000,000 - 2,575,000 Total Funding 2,878,800 3,725,050 985,000 255,000 5,385,000 355,000 13,583,850 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 177 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Park Acquisitions/Development Project No:gpbd04 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET1 - 656,790 - - 656,790 KC Prop 2 - 65,516 30,000 30,000 95,516 - 722,306 30,000 30,000 752,306 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition 722,306 30,000 30,000 752,306 Construction - - - - - - 722,306 30,000 30,000 752,306 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET1 - - - - - KC Prop 2 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Acquisition 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 Construction - - - - - 50,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 485,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None Land and other property acquisitions to occur based on demand and deficiencies including parks, open space, trails, corridors and recreational facilities. Progress Summary: The City purchased the Auburn Avenue Theater in 2020 Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 178 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Jacobsen Tree Farm Development Project No:cp0609, cp2020 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 25,321 - - - 25,321 Grants- Unsecured State - - - 500,000 - King County Prop 2 - 14,000 - 333,500 14,000 Park Impact Fees - - - 2,581,550 - Other (TBD)- - - - 25,321 14,000 - 3,415,050 39,321 Capital Expenditures: Design 25,321 14,000 - 300,000 39,321 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 3,115,050 - 25,321 14,000 - 3,415,050 39,321 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured State - - 1,000,000 - 1,500,000 King County Prop 2 - - - - 333,500 Park Impact Fees - 2,000,000 4,581,550 Other (TBD)- - 2,000,000 - 2,000,000 - - 5,000,000 - 8,415,050 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 500,000 - 800,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 4,500,000 - 7,615,050 - - 5,000,000 - 8,415,050 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Develop the 29.3 acre site into a Community Park. A Master Plan for the park was completed in 2009 and will serve as a roadmap for development of the site. The newly annexed Lea Hill area of the City is deficient in park acreage. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: No significant impact due to master plan. Future park development will result in maintenance and utility expenses undeterminable at this time. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 179 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: West Hill Park Acquisition Project No:gpbd27 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Progress Summary: None Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - KCCF Grant (Unsecured)- - 400,000 - 400,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - 400,000 - 400,000 Total Funding Sources:- - 800,000 - 800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Acquisition - - 800,000 - 800,000 Total Expenditures:- - 800,000 - 800,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - KCCF Grant (Unsecured)- - - - 400,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - 400,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - 800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Acquisition - - - - 800,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 800,000 Grant funding will be from the King County Conservation Futures Grant. Acquire property on the West Hill for future park development. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 180 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Game Farm Park Improvements Project No:gpbd08, cp1720, cp1924 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 13,431 - - 13,431 Grants- Unsecured State - - - - - Grants- Secured Local -KCYSF - 150,000 - 150,000 REET - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Other (Park Mitigation Fee)- - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)40,000 294,010 - - 334,010 53,431 444,010 1,000,000 - 1,497,441 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 40,000 - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 53,431 444,010 960,000 - 1,457,441 53,431 444,010 1,000,000 - 1,497,441 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured State - - - - - Grants- Secured Local -KCYSF - - - - - REET - - - - 1,000,000 Other (Park Mitigation Fee)- - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- - - - - - - - - 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 960,000 - - - - 1,000,000 Grants / Other Sources: King County Youth Sports Facilities Grant Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None Improve interior lighting and pathways and provide access from the newly acquired property on southwest corner of the park. The project will also replace synthetic turf on two full sized soccer fields. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 181 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburndale Park Project No:gpbd01 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- - 100,000 - 100,000 Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - - - 100,000 - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 5,000 - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 95,000 - 95,000 - - 100,000 - 100,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- - - - 100,000 Other (KC Prop 2)- - - - - - - - - 100,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 5,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 95,000 - - - - 100,000 Progress Summary: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Utilities would increase by $5,000 Develop a Master Plan for the Park, install an irrigation system, new play structure and improve signage. Create an entrance to the park from the east via 110th Ave SE to allow access from the adjacent neighborhoods. Construct new section of trail in the western portion of the park. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 182 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburndale Park II Project No:gpbd05 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other TBD - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other TBD 575,000 - - - 575,000 575,000 - - - 575,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 - - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 500,000 - - - 500,000 575,000 - - - 575,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: Develop a Master Plan, improve the existing trail system and install signage and play structure. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Increased utility costs of $2,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 183 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Sunset Park Improvements Project No:cp1921 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees 22,235 - 177,800 - 200,035 Other -Contributions & Donations - - - - - 22,235 - 177,800 - 200,035 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 15,000 - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 22,235 - 162,800 - 185,035 22,235 - 177,800 - 200,035 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - 177,800 Other -Contributions & Donations - - - - - - - - - 177,800 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 162,800 - - - - 177,800 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Description: Expand playground area to include spray park and additional play activities. Coordinate improvements with service club and Lakeland Hills Homeowners Association. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Increase in Utilities of $10,000 per year City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 184 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Cedar Lanes Bike Park Project No:gpbd28 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Progress Summary: None Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - KC Youth Sports Grant (Secured)- - 118,000 - 118,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - 223,000 - 223,000 Total Funding Sources:- - 341,000 - 341,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 15,000 - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 326,000 - 326,000 Total Expenditures:- - 341,000 - 341,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - KC Youth Sports Grant (Secured)- - - - 118,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - 223,000 Total Funding Sources:- - - - 341,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 15,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 326,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 341,000 Costruct a bike park and restroom at Cedar Lanes Park. Bike park to inlcude an asphalt pump track and skills course. Pedestrian trails in the park will also be improved Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 185 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: BPA Trail on Lea Hill Project No:gpbd23 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)- - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (KC Prop. 2)*- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Predesign - - - - Design - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (State RCO)150,000 - - - 150,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other (KC Prop. 2)*- - - - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Predesign 25,000 - - - 25,000 Design 125,000 - - - 125,000 Construction - - - - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None Develop a feasibility study related to constructability of a pedestrian trail linking the Jacobsen Tree Farm site to the west end of Lea Hill. This trail would follow the alignment of the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) transmission lines from 132nd to 108th Avenue SE. Construction would be in phases based on constructability. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 186 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lakeland Hills Nature Area Project No:gpbd11 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees - - - - Park Mitigation Fees - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - Park Impact Fees 25,000 - 75,000 100,000 200,000 Park Mitigation Fees - - - - - 25,000 - 75,000 100,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 25,000 - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 75,000 100,000 175,000 25,000 - 75,000 100,000 200,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Increased maintenance costs of $5,000 Complete Master Plan to include the development and construction of an environmental community park. Trails, fencing, parking and visitor amenities are included in the project. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 187 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Miscellaneous Parks Improvements Project No:gpbd03 Project Type:Capacity/Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 30,715 80,000 50,000 50,000 160,715 Grants- Unsecured State - - - - - Local Grant - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)- 63,869 50,000 50,000 113,869 30,715 143,869 100,000 100,000 274,584 Capital Expenditures: Professional Services - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 30,715 143,869 100,000 100,000 274,584 30,715 143,869 100,000 100,000 274,584 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Grants- Unsecured State - - - - - Local Grant - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)*50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Capital Expenditures: Professional Services - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 600,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None Minor park improvements including shelters, roofs, playgrounds, irrigation and restrooms. Progress Summary: Project funding includes the Mill Pond Dock Improvement (cp1915) in 2019 and the Brannan Park Kompan Soccer Field improvements (cp1706) in 2018 Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 188 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Cameron Park Project No:gpbd24 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Local - - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Fund 321 -Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Unsecured Local 55,000 - 55,000 - 110,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - Other - - - - - 55,000 - 55,000 - 110,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 5,000 - 5,000 - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 50,000 - 50,000 - 100,000 55,000 - 55,000 - 110,000 Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None This project will improve the pedestrian trail and add landscape and fencing to serve as buffer to the neighborhood and play structure. This project is identified in the Parks Improvement Plan. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 189 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Fulmer Park Playground Replacement Project No:gpbd25 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Kaboom - - - 50,000 - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - - 100,000 - - - - 150,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 7,500 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 142,500 - - - - 150,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Kaboom - - - - 50,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - - KC Prop 2 - - - - 100,000 - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 7,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 142,500 - - - - 150,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Replace aging playground. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 190 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Mini Soccer Field Turf Replacement Project No:gpbd26 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Interlocal KCYSFG)- - 50,000 - 50,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 2,500 - 2,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 47,500 - 47,500 - - 50,000 - 50,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Unsecured (Interlocal KCYSFG)- - - - 50,000 REET - - - - - Other - - - - - - - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 2,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 47,500 - - - - 50,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Replace synthetic turf in the Kompan mini soccer field. Based on heavy use of this facility surface replacement is expected to be needed at approximate 5 year intervals. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 191 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Fairway Drainage Improvement Project No:gpbd19, cp1911, cp2002 Project Type:Non-capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund 1,623 - - - 1,623 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 59,958 30,000 30,000 30,000 119,958 Other - - - - - 61,581 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,581 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 61,581 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,581 61,581 30,000 30,000 30,000 121,581 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Other - - - - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Apply top dressing sand to the first five fairways in order to firm up these landing areas so that the holes are playable year round. Sand will be applied with a three yard topdressing machine. Sand will be applied bi/weekly at a tenth of an inch of sand throughout the fairways. Fairways will start to show improvements once four inches of sand are applied. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 192 MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION FUND (321)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Community Center Parking Lot Improvements Project No:gpbd29 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Progress Summary: None Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - 250,000 - 250,000 Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - 250,000 - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 250,000 - 250,000 Total Expenditures:- - 250,000 - 250,000 Forecasted Project Cost: Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Municipal Parks Construction Fund - - - - - Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Bond Proceeds - - - - - REET - - - - 250,000 Other - - - - - Total Funding Sources:- - - - 250,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 250,000 Total Expenditures:- - - - 250,000 Resurface the main drive that serves the Community and Event Center at Les Gove Park. The existing pervious concrete surface is deteriorated from weather and heavy use. Parks staff will work with Public Works and industry professionals to determine appropriate surfacing. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 193 TABLE PR-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets PARKS, ARTS & RECREATION - MUNICIPAL PARKS CONSTRUCTION Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Auburndale Park 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 5,000$ 30,000$ - 2 Auburndale Park II - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,000 3 Sunset Park 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 60,000 - - 4 Lakeland Hills Nature Area - - - - - 5,000 5,000 Total 15,000$ 15,000$ 17,000$ 17,000$ 17,000$ 22,000$ 103,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 194 SENIOR CENTER Current Facilities The City of Auburn currently has one Senior Center. Table PR-5 Facilities Inventory lists the facility along with its current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 146.98 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2021 citywide population of 83,005. The proposed LOS of 139.85 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2026-projected citywide population of 87,239. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The CFP does not include any senior center capital facilities projects during 2021-2026 Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for the senior center facility during the six years 2022 – 2027. TABLE PR-5 Facilities Inventory Senior Center CAPACITY FACILITY (Square Feet)LOCATION Existing Inventory: Senior Center 12,200 808 9th Street SE Total Existing Inventory 12,200 Proposed Capacity Projects: None - Total Proposed Capacity Projects - 2026 Projected Inventory Total 12,200 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 195 GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Current Facilities The current inventory of City government administration and operations facilities include 207,629 square feet for general government operations, 66,469 square feet for police services, and 38,646 square feet for fire protection, for a total of 312,744 square feet. Table GM – 1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 3,767.77 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the 2021 citywide population of 83,005. The proposed LOS of 3,630.76 square feet per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2026-projected citywide population of 87,239. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s General Municipal Building facilities include six capital projects at a cost of $3,719,820 and debt service at a cost of $3,941,500 for a total of $7,661,320. The major projects include (1) $1,440,000 for the Auburn Arts & Culture Center Renovation, (2) $470,000 for Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay (3) $320,000 for M&O Fuel Tank and $3,941,500 for City Hall Annex debt service costs. Table GM – 2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table GM-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $570,000 are forecasted for General Municipal buildings facilities during the six years 2022 - 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 196 TABLE GM -1 Facilities Inventory General Municipal Buildings CAPACITY FACILITY (Square Feet)LOCATION Existing Inventory: General Government: City Hall 61,721 25 W Main Street City Hall Annex 45,034 1 W Main Street City Maintenance & Operations Facility 17,940 1305 C Street SW Community Center 13,973 910 9th Street SE Municipal Court (Justice Center-Leased to King County)12,200 340 E Main Street Activity Center 10,074 910 9th Street SE Auburn Arts & Culture Center 8,744 100 Auburn Avenue Auburn Avenue Theater 7,560 10 Auburn Avenue Youth Center 7,132 910 9th Street SE Auburn Valley Humane Society -(Leased to AVHS)5,900 4910 A Street GSA Building 5,580 2905 C Street SW #815 R Street Building 4,977 2840 Riverwalk Drive Les Gove Storage Building 4,044 910 9th Street SE Street Waste Handling Facility 2,750 1305 C Street SW Total 207,629 Police: Gun range 32,880 1600 Block 15th St NW Headquarters (Justice Center)24,800 340 E Main Street R Street Building (Leased to Puget Sound Theft Task Force)4,789 2840 Riverwalk Drive Seized vehicle parking stalls 3,000 2905 C Street SW GSA Building 1,000 2905 C Street SW #815 Total 66,469 Fire: Stations: GSA Station #35 16,526 2905 C Street SW North Station #31 12,220 1101 D Street NE South Station #32 5,200 1951 R Street SE Other Facilities: North Station Maint. Facility 4,700 1101 D Street NE Total 38,646 Total Existing Inventory 312,744 Proposed Capacity Projects: Maintenance & Operations New Maintenance Bay 4,000 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 4,000 2026 Projected Inventory Total 316,744 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 197 TABLE GM -2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 199 Auburn Arts & Culture Center Renovation Capital Costs 440,000 - 1,000,000 - - - 1,440,000 Funding Sources: Fund Balance - - - - - - - Grants 90,000 - 500,000 - - - 590,000 Other (Cumulative Reserve F122)- - - - - - - Other Park Impact Fees 350,000 - 500,000 - - - 850,000 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 440,000 - 1,000,000 - - - 1,440,000 Non-Capacity Projects: 200 M & O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 - - - - - 200,000 Funding Sources: Equipment Rental Fund 55,000 - - - - - 55,000 Operating Transfer -Water 48,334 - - - - - 48,334 Operating Transfer -Sewer 48,333 - - - - - 48,333 Operating Transfer -Storm 48,333 - - - - - 48,333 201 Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay Capital Costs 470,000 - - - - - 470,000 Funding Sources: Equipment Rental Fund 123,000 - - - - - 123,000 Operating Transfer -Water 115,666 - - - - - 115,666 Operating Transfer -Sewer 115,667 - - - - - 115,667 Operating Transfer -Storm 115,667 - - - - - 115,667 202 M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Capital Costs 320,000 - - - - - 320,000 Funding Sources: Equipment Rental Fund 80,000 - - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Water 80,000 - - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Sewer 80,000 - - - - - 80,000 Operating Transfer -Storm 80,000 - - - - - 80,000 203 M&O Lunchroom Expansion Capital Costs 150,000 - - - - - 150,000 Funding Sources: Equipment Rental Fund 40,000 - - - - - 40,000 Operating Transfer -Water 36,666 - - - - - 36,666 Operating Transfer -Sewer 36,667 - - - - - 36,667 Operating Transfer -Storm 36,667 - - - - - 36,667 204 HVAC Equipment Replacement Capital Costs 1,102,310 37,510 - - - - 1,139,820 Funding Sources: Operating Transfer -Facilities 371,470 37,510 - - - - 408,980 REET 1 730,840 - - - - - 730,840 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 198 TABLE GM -2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 205 City Hall Annex Long-Term Debt 656,600 658,000 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 Funding Sources: REET 1 656,600 658,000 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 2,242,310 37,510 - - - - 2,279,820 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 440,000 - 1,000,000 - - - 1,440,000 Non-Capacity Projects 2,242,310 37,510 - - - - 2,279,820 Long-Term Debt 656,600 658,000 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 Total Costs 3,338,910 695,510 1,656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 7,661,320 FUNDING SOURCES: Equipment Rental Fund 298,000 - - - - - 298,000 Operating Transfer -Water 280,666 - - - - - 280,666 Operating Transfer -Sewer 280,667 - - - - - 280,667 Operating Transfer -Storm 280,667 - - - - - 280,667 Operating Transfer -Facilities 371,470 37,510 - - - - 408,980 Grants 90,000 - 500,000 - - - 590,000 Cumulative Reserve Fund 122 - - - - - - - Park Impact Fees 350,000 - 500,000 - - - 850,000 REET 1 1,387,440 658,000 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 4,672,340 Total Funding 3,338,910 695,510 1,656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 7,661,320 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 199 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Arts & Culture Center Renovation Project No:cp1612 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Daryl Faber Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants- Secured (State)- 400,000 90,000 - 490,000 Grants- Secured (Local)264,042 143,808 - - 407,850 Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - Other -(Cumulative Reserve)- 42,200 - - 42,200 REET - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)5,418 494,582 350,000 - 850,000 269,460 1,080,590 440,000 - 1,790,050 Capital Expenditures: Design 66,021 55,000 - - 121,021 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 203,439 1,025,590 440,000 - 1,669,029 269,460 1,080,590 440,000 - 1,790,050 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants- Secured (State)- - - - 90,000 Grants- Secured (Local)- - - - - Grants - Local Unsecured 500,000 - - - 500,000 Other -(Cumulative Reserve)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other (Park Impact Fee)500,000 - - - 850,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,440,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 - - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 925,000 - - - 1,365,000 1,000,000 - - - 1,440,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Renovation to the property and building located at 20 Auburn Avenue (100 Auburn Avenue) Building for the creation of an Arts & Culture Center in downtown Auburn. The renovation of this building will allow increased access to the arts for all of Auburn residents and visitors. Having a dedicated Art Center alongside the Auburn Avenue Theater performing arts series has the potential to transform Auburn into an arts tourism destination within the South Puget Sound. This project is a high priority for the City of Auburn and the purchase of this important building was completed in 2016. Progress Summary: The City has secured $898,000 in grant funding. The historic window restoration was completed in 2018, interior demolition started in 2019, and final renovation designs completed in 2020. It is anticipated that Phase 1 renovation of the main floor will begin in 2020 and continue through 2021. As a landmark building, exterior renovations must maintain the historic character of the building. Phase 2 renovations for the basement are expected to begin in 2023 at which time the City intends to apply for additional grant funds. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual operating budget fiscal impact is estimated to be $95,000. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 200 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Vehicle Storage Bay Improvements Project No:cp0711 Project Type: Project Manager:Tyler Thompson Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue 5,451 - 55,000 - 60,451 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 145,000 - 145,000 5,451 - 200,000 - 205,451 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 5,451 190,000 - 195,451 5,451 - 200,000 - 205,451 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 55,000 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 145,000 - - - - 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 190,000 - - - - 200,000 Non-Capacity Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Enclose the 8 existing bays to provide necessary weather protection for street sweepers, vactors, sanding, and snow plow equipment. Construct storage shed to facilitate removal of portable containers, improving space utilization and traffic flow throughout M&O. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 201 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Equipment Rental Vehicle Maintenance Bay Project No:cp1223 Project Type: Project Manager:Tyler Thompson Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue 29,276 - 123,000 - 152,276 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 347,000 - 347,000 29,276 - 470,000 - 499,276 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 22,000 - 22,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 29,276 448,000 - 477,276 29,276 - 470,000 - 499,276 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 123,000 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 347,000 - - - - 470,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 22,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 448,000 - - - - 470,000 Non-Capacity Build additional vehicle bay at Equipment Rental shop for heavy equipment and large vehicles to improve efficiency and remove choke points. Adding a large vehicle bay with a large vehicle lift will enable us to perform inspections and maintenance on more than one large vehicle at a time, this becomes extremely important during emergency operations such as snow and ice events. The City currently has 2.5 maintenance bays, this project will add one more maintenance bay for a total of 3.5 bays. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 202 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Fuel Tank Replacement Project No:erbd01 Project Type: Project Manager:Tyler Thompson Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - 80,000 - 80,000 REET 1 - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- 240,000 - 240,000 - - 320,000 - 320,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 25,000 - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 295,000 - 295,000 - - 320,000 - 320,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 80,000 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 240,000 - - - - 320,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 25,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 295,000 - - - - 320,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: This project should reduce the operating budget due to lower maintenance and inspection costs. Non-Capacity Replace three 10,000 gallon underground tanks with new above ground tanks. The existing tanks were installed in 1989 and are single wall fiberglass tanks. It will be a benefit to the City to have the tanks above ground in the future due to the reduced maintenance and inspection cost. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 203 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FUND (560)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: M&O Lunchroom Expansion Project No:erbd02 Project Type: Project Manager:Tyler Thompson Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - 40,000 - 40,000 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - 110,000 - 110,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 10,000 - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 140,000 - 140,000 - - 150,000 - 150,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Equip. Rental Revenue - - - - 40,000 REET 1 - - - - - Other (Water, Sewer, Storm)- - - - 110,000 - - - - 150,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 140,000 - - - - 150,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: None Non-Capacity Expansion of the current lunchroom by redesigning the area to accommodate All-Staff meetings, provide for a training facility, lunch room and also serve as the Department Operations Center (DOC) during an emergency event. In addition, the design will include sliding doors which will allow the area to serve two purposes at once, for example, one half of the room being used as a DOC and the other half open to employees to use as a lunch/break room. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 204 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: HVAC Equipment Replacement Project No:gcbd17 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Lisa Moore Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - - - Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - - REET 1 - - 730,840 730,840 Facilities Fund-Transfer In - - 371,470 37,510 371,470 - - 1,102,310 37,510 1,102,310 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 1,102,310 37,510 1,102,310 - - 1,102,310 37,510 1,102,310 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - - - Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - - REET 1 - - - - 730,840 Facilities Fund-Transfer In - - - - 408,980 - - - - 1,139,820 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,139,820 - - - - 1,139,820 Replace HVAC Equipment at City Hall, Auburn Senior Center, Mountain View Cemetery, Arts & Culture Center building, Maintenance and Operations building and the Auburn Avenue Theater. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will reduce operating costs through energy conservation and reduced maintenance and repair. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 205 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Hall Annex Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 1,315,311 658,700 656,600 658,000 2,630,611 1,315,311 658,700 656,600 658,000 2,630,611 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 1,315,311 658,700 656,600 658,000 2,630,611 1,315,311 658,700 656,600 658,000 2,630,611 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 1 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 656,400 656,900 657,000 656,600 3,941,500 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: To pay scheduled debt service costs on 2010 General Obligation bonds issued for the City Hall Annex. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 206 TABLE GM-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets GENERAL MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Auburn Arts & Culture Ctr. Renovation 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 570,000$ Total 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 95,000$ 570,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 207 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Current Facilities Community Improvements include sidewalk and traffic signal improvements, neighborhood traffic calming program, Main Street urban design improvements, public art and phase two of the Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk project. Level of Service (LOS) No Level of Service for community improvement projects have been identified at this time. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s proposed Community Improvements include thirteen capital projects at a cost of $7,134,310 and debt service at a cost of 1,332,000 for a total of $8,466,310. Table CI-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual work sheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table CI-3 shows, because of the City Street light LED retrofit program the operating budget will save approximately $807,500 for community improvement facilities during the six years 2022-2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 208 TABLE CI-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 210 Auburn Way South (SR-164) - Southside Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs - 95,000 750,000 - - - 845,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Grants - 80,000 600,000 - - - 680,000 REET 2 - 15,000 150,000 - - - 165,000 211 104th Ave. Park Development Capital Costs 1,030,500 - - - - - 1,030,500 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Grants 565,000 - - - - - 565,000 Other Park Impact Fees 465,500 - - - - - 465,500 212 Downtown Plaza Park Capital Costs 377,700 - - - - - 377,700 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Other Park Impact Fees 145,230 - - - - - 145,230 Other -Developer Fees 232,470 - - - - - 232,470 Subtotal, Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 1,408,200 95,000 750,000 - - - 2,253,200 Non-Capacity Projects: 213 Public Art Capital Costs 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 214 Citywide ADA & Sidewalk Improvements Capital Costs 185,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 985,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - REET 2 185,000 - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 985,000 215 Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools Capital Costs 70,000 950,000 - - - - 1,020,000 Funding Sources: Grants 55,000 700,000 - - - - 755,000 REET2 15,000 200,000 - 215,000 Other -Auburn School Dist.- 50,000 - - - - 50,000 216 Annual Traffic Signal Replacement & Improvements Capital Costs 200,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 200,000 100,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 217 Citywide Street Lighting Improvements Capital Costs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 209 TABLE CI-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Non-Capacity Projects: 218 City Street Lighting LED Retrofit Capital Costs 39,010 - - - - - 39,010 Funding Sources: Grants 2,010 - - - - - 2,010 REET 2 37,000 - - - - - 37,000 219 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Program Capital Costs 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 10,000 10,000 10,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 220 City Wetland Mitigation Projects Capital Costs 36,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - Other (Fund 124-Wetland Mit.)36,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 221 Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk -Phase 2 Capital Costs - - 75,000 800,000 - - 875,000 Funding Sources: Capital Improvement Fund - - - - - - - REET 2 - - 75,000 - - - 75,000 Other - To Be Determined - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 222 City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration Capital Costs 240,500 - - - - - 240,500 Funding Sources: Local Revitalization Fund 240,500 - - - - - 240,500 Other - To Be Determined - - - - - - - 223 Local Revitalization Long Term Debt 225,000 223,700 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 Funding Sources: REET 2 225,000 223,700 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 Subtotal, Non-Capacity Projects: Capital Costs 861,110 1,145,000 570,000 1,235,000 535,000 535,000 4,881,110 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 1,408,200 95,000 750,000 - - - 2,253,200 Non-Capacity Projects 861,110 1,145,000 570,000 1,235,000 535,000 535,000 4,881,110 Long-Term Debt 225,000 223,700 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 Total Costs 2,494,310 1,463,700 1,542,000 1,454,800 757,300 754,200 8,466,310 FUNDING SOURCES: Capital Improvement Fund 328 - - - - - - - Local Revitalization Fund 330 240,500 - - - - - 240,500 Grants 767,240 780,000 600,000 - - - 2,147,240 REET 2 752,000 628,700 937,000 649,800 752,300 749,200 4,469,000 Other -To Be Determined - - - 800,000 - - 800,000 Other -Auburn School Dist.- 50,000 - - - - 50,000 Other (Fund 124-Parks Impact)697,970 - - - - - 697,970 Other (Fund 124-Wetland Mit.)36,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 Total Funding 2,494,310 1,463,700 1,542,000 1,454,800 757,300 754,200 8,466,310 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Way South (SR-164) - Southside Sidewalk Improvements TIP# N-7 Project No:gcbd10 Project Type:Capacity, Non-motorized, Safety Project Manager:TBD Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured - - - 80,000 - REET 2 - - - 15,000 - Other (Fund 102)- - - - - - - - 95,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 95,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 95,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured 600,000 - - - 680,000 REET 2 150,000 - - - 165,000 Other (Fund 102)- - - - - 750,000 - - - 845,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 95,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 750,000 - - - 750,000 750,000 - - - 845,000 Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Description: The project will construct missing sidewalk along the south side of Auburn Way S. The existing sidewalk along the south side currently ends at the intersection with Howard Road and restarts to the west of the intersection with Muckleshoot Plaza. The sidewalk gap extends for approximately 1,700 feet. The project also includes a Rapid Flashing Rectangular Beacon (RRFB) across Howard Road to provide a connection from the existing non-motorized facilities to the proposed improvements. Progress Summary: Grant funding for the project will be applied for in 2020. Depending on the funding source the design phase could occur in 2021 with construction of the improvements in 2022, or the design phase could start in 2023 with construction of the improvements in 2024. REET funding shown in the previous CFP in 2021 and 2022 has been moved to 2022 and 2023 respectively in this CFP, without any proposed increase. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 211 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: 104th Ave. Park Development Project No: cp1619 Project Type: Capacity Project Manager: Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Cap Improve - - - - - Grants - Secured State - - 565,000 - 565,000 REET2 2,424 - - - 2,424 Other -Park Impact Fees 16,559 50,000 465,500 - 532,059 18,983 50,000 1,030,500 - 1,099,483 Capital Expenditures: Design 18,983 50,000 30,500 - 99,483 Construction - - 1,000,000 - 1,000,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - 18,983 50,000 1,030,500 - 1,099,483 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Cap Improve - - - - - Grants - Secured State - - - - 565,000 REET2 - - - - - Other -Park Impact Fees - - - - 465,500 - - - - 1,030,500 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 30,500 Construction - - - - 1,000,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - - 1,030,500 Complete Master Plan and construct park improvements identified in the Master Plan. Anticipated improvements include parking, trails, restroom, and playground. Work associated with permit approvals is also included in the budget. Progress Summary: The City was awarded a State grant from RCO where funds became available in June 2019. Park staff is currently working with design consultant team and Public Works to design the project. Design is anticipated to be completed in early 2021, and construction in Spring/Summer 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The annual impact on the operating budget is estimated to be $10,000 for temporary wages and $2,500 for supplies. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 212 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Downtown Plaza Park Project No:cp2016 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Jamie Kelly Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Cap Imp.- - - - - Developer Fees - 32,160 232,470 - 264,630 Other -Park Impact Fees - - 145,230 - 145,230 - 32,160 377,700 - 409,860 Capital Expenditures: Design - 32,160 17,025 - 49,185 Construction - - 360,675 - 360,675 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - 32,160 377,700 - 409,860 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Cap Imp.- - - - - Developer Fees - - - - 232,470 Other -Park Impact Fees - - - - 145,230 - - - - 377,700 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 17,025 Construction - - - - 360,675 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - - 377,700 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will renovate and improve the plaza area across from City Hall. Improvements will complement the new commercial building store fronts on the adjacent property that is being constructed in 2020. Improvement will include, but not be limited to seating, plantings, surfacing, and public art. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 213 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Public Art Project No: gcbd05, cp1818 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Julie Krueger Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 163,000 97,500 30,000 30,000 290,500 Other - - - - - 163,000 97,500 30,000 30,000 290,500 Capital Expenditures: Design 62,500 - - - 62,500 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 100,500 97,500 30,000 30,000 228,000 163,000 97,500 30,000 30,000 290,500 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Other - - - - - 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 180,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: None The City designates $30,000 annually toward the purchase of public art, for placement at designated locations throughout the City. Progress Summary: Arts Commission will meet to assess future needs and seek approval from City Council on placement. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 214 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide ADA & Sidewalk Improvements TIP# N-2 Project No:cp1710, cp1804, cp1815, cp1902 gcbd01 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:James Webb LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants -Unsecured State 263,250 - - - 263,250 REET 2 376,595 200,000 185,000 - 761,595 Other 40,000 - - - 40,000 679,845 200,000 185,000 - 1,064,845 Capital Expenditures: Design 88,713 20,000 20,000 - 128,713 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 591,132 180,000 165,000 - 936,132 679,845 200,000 185,000 - 1,064,845 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants -Unsecured State - - - - - REET 2 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 985,000 Other - - - - - 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 985,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 180,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 885,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 985,000 Description: The program will construct citywide accessibility improvements to the public right-of-way sidewalk system including adding/upgrading curb ramps, removing barriers to access and completing gaps. Projects are prioritized annually based on pedestrian demands, existing deficiencies, and citizen requests. Program funds reflect remaining budget after allocations to specific ADA and sidewalk improvement projects. Progress Summary: REET funding shown in the previous CFP in this program in 2021 and 2022 have been included in the Lea Hill Safe Routes to School Project (a project being completed under this program), without any increase. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 215 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Lea Hill Safe Routes to Schools TIP# N-11 Project No:gcbd16 Project Type:Non-Motorized Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured - - 55,000 700,000 55,000 Contributions - - - REET 2 - - 15,000 200,000 15,000 Other (ASD)- - - 50,000 - - - 70,000 950,000 70,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 70,000 - 70,000 Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service - - - 950,000 - - - 70,000 950,000 70,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured - - - - 755,000 Contributions - - - - - REET 2 - - - - 215,000 Other (ASD)- - - - 50,000 - - - - 1,020,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 70,000 Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service - - - - 950,000 - - - - 1,020,000 The project will construct non-motorized improvements along SE 304th St from Hazelwood Elementary School extending east to 124th Ave SE, and along the west side of 124th Ave SE to the south of SE 304th St. The project will complete multiple gaps in the existing non-motorized network. The project will also construct curb and gutter, ADA compliant curb ramps, driveways aprons and retaining walls associated with the new sidewalks. Utility poles will need to be relocated to accommodate the proposed sidewalk alignment in some locations. Additional lighting is proposed for pedestrian safety and will be incorporated onto existing/relocated utility poles, and an RRFB will be installed at the SE 304th St intersection with 116th Ave SE. Ancillary work, including but not limited to, property restoration, grading, storm upgrades, school zone beacon relocation, channelization, fencing, landscaping and mailbox relocation will be addressed with the project. Progress Summary: Grant funding will be applied for in 2020. If secured, the design phase will be started in 2021 and construction completed during 2022. REET funding included in the previous CFP under the Citywide ADA & Sidewalk Improvements Project (gcbd01) are shown in this project and the corresponding reduction in REET funds are reflected in gcbd01. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 216 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Annual Traffic Signal Replacement & Improvements TIP# I-2 Project No:cp1813, cp1906, cp2004, gcbd07 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:Scott Nutter LOS Corridor ID# N/A Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 278,443 100,000 200,000 100,000 578,443 Other - - - - - 278,443 100,000 200,000 100,000 578,443 Capital Expenditures: Design 22,877 - - - 22,877 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 255,566 100,000 200,000 100,000 555,566 278,443 100,000 200,000 100,000 578,443 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Other - - - - - 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 200,000 100,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 Description: The program will replace end of life capital facilities replacement for traffic signal and Intelligent Transportation System equipment including cabinets, video detection cameras, field network devices, traffic cameras, battery backup components, and other related equipment. The program also includes minor safety improvements, operations improvements, and Accessible Pedestrian Signal Improvements based on the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Progress Summary: Project continues to complete various intersection improvements. REET funding in 2022 and 2024 has been reduced annually by $100k from what was approved in the previous CFP. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will have a positive impact on the operating budget for street maintenance, reducing maintenance costs. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 217 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Citywide Street Lighting Improvements TIP# I-4 Project No: cp1928, cp2005, gcbd09 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Scott Nutter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 33,725 50,000 50,000 50,000 133,725 33,725 50,000 50,000 50,000 133,725 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction 33,725 50,000 50,000 50,000 133,725 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - 33,725 50,000 50,000 50,000 133,725 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 300,000 The project constructs lighting improvements throughout the City, including upgrading decorative street lights not converted to LED with the 2020 conversion project, and installing new street lights. Progress Summary: Annual REET funding reduced by $50,000 since previous approved CFP. Future Impact on Operating Budget: New street lights installed with this program will increase the City's street light power costs but this increase will be offset by decreased power costs as existing standard street lights are converted to LED. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 218 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Street Light LED Retrofit TIP# I-17 Project No: cp1920 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Scott Nutter Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured Federal - 497,990 2,010 - 500,000 Contributions 350,000 - - 350,000 REET 2 - 1,813,000 37,000 - 1,850,000 - 2,660,990 39,010 - 2,700,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 112,294 - - 112,294 Construction - 2,548,696 39,010 - 2,587,706 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - 2,660,990 39,010 - 2,700,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured Federal - - - - 2,010 Contributions - REET 2 - - - - 37,000 - - - - 39,010 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - 39,010 Long-Term Debt Service - - - - - - - - - 39,010 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The project will convert all City owned cobra-head street lights to LED. This phase of the project will convert all City owned cobra- head street lights to LED and add smart lighting control technology. Federal grant funding for this phase of the project was awarded in 2019. Future phases to upgrade other types of City street lights (such as decorative residential and downtown decorative lights) to LED will be considered as additional funding is available. Progress Summary: A detailed audit of all existing City owned lights and the design phase of the project have been completed. The construction phase of the project is programmed to begin during Spring 2020. REET funds shown in 2021 reflect anticipated carry forward of 2020 funds to complete project in 2021. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Annual savings in power usage is anticipated to be $130,000 per year. Additional maintenance savings will be realized in the reduction of materials for light replacement and is estimated to be $20,000 per year. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 219 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Neighborhood Traffic Safety Program TIP# R-1 Project No:cp1814, cp1907, cp2013, gcbd06 Project Type:Non-Capacity (Annual) Project Manager:Scott Nutter Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 76,198 10,000 10,000 10,000 96,198 Other - - - - - 76,198 10,000 10,000 10,000 96,198 Capital Expenditures: Design 76,198 1,000 1,000 1,000 78,198 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 9,000 9,000 9,000 18,000 76,198 10,000 10,000 10,000 96,198 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 10,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 Other - - - - - 10,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 1,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 18,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 9,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 162,000 10,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 180,000 Description: This program will implement low-cost traffic calming strategies, supported by engineering studies as necessary. Projects will be selected annually based on requests from residents, or police concerns, crash history, and available staff and financial resources. Progress Summary: Staffing constraints and limited resources make this program challenging to administer. Traffic calming strategies and approaches are being updated to be more sustainable, and adapted to the limited resources (staff and financial) available. REET funding has been reduced by $140k annually starting in 2021 from the approved amount shown in the previous CFP. Future Impact on Operating Budget: The traffic calming program will have no impact on the operating budget for street maintenance. Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 220 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Wetland Mitigation Projects Project No:cp1315 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Tate Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Fund 124 Wetland Mitigation Account 6,969 5,000 36,600 5,000 48,569 REET - - - - - 6,969 5,000 36,600 5,000 48,569 Capital Expenditures: Design - 10,000 - 10,000 Monitoring 1,868 5,000 5,000 5,000 11,868 Construction 5,101 21,600 - 26,701 6,969 5,000 36,600 5,000 48,569 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Fund 124 Wetland Mitigation Account 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 REET - - - - - 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 10,000 Monitoring 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 30,000 Construction - - - - 21,600 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 61,600 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project designs and constructs off-site wetland mitigation in the Auburn Environmental Park for participating development projects as approved through the City's development review process. Design, construction, monitoring, and maintenance of the mitigation is funded through wetland mitigation fees collected by the City. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: After construction, each wetland mitigation site will be monitored and maintained for a period of three to five years, depending on the specific requirements for the project. Funding for future year monitoring and maintenance is included in the development fees collected by the City, and is budgeted as part of the Capital Facilities Plan. Replacement plantings for Auburn Airport tree removal conducted in 2013. Design and construction of mitigation for other development sites deferred to 2021. Years 2019-2024 scheduled for site monitoring only. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 221 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Auburn Environmental Park Boardwalk - Phase 2 Project No:cp1611 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Jeff Tate Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - - - Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - - REET 2 - - - - - Other -TBD - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - Unsecured State - - - - - Grants - Local Unsecured - - - - - REET 2 75,000 - - - 75,000 Other -TBD - 800,000 - - 800,000 75,000 800,000 - - 875,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 - - - 75,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 800,000 - - 800,000 75,000 800,000 - - 875,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: The Auburn Environmental Park (AEP) provides vegetated natural open space within an urbanized area. The AEP provides opportunities for local economic development, water quality improvement, storm water detention, flood control, fish and wildlife enhancement, visual resources, public education, and passive recreation, including walking trails and bird viewing amenities. In 2012, the City completed the construction of approximately 1,200 lineal feet of the first phase (Phase 1) of an elevated boardwalk trail in the Auburn Environmental Park (AEP). This trail extended from West Main Street through existing wetlands in the AEP terminating at the base of the Bird Viewing Tower constructed in 2009. As part of the construction of the elevated boardwalk, the City also installed interpretative signage, bench seating, limited new vehicle parking on Western Avenue and over two acres of wetland species of trees, plants and shrubs. Phase 2 of the elevated boardwalk trail would construct a combination of up to approximately 2,000 lineal feet of surface trail and elevated boardwalk trail from the current terminus at the Bird Viewing Tower to a connection with the Interurban Trail. The Phase 2 project will further previous and current Councils’ visions of the AEP providing passive recreation and environmental education opportunities for all Auburn citizens. Progress Summary: Design for this project is scheduled to start in fall of 2023. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Construction of the Phase 2 project is anticipated to incur approximately $10,000 in annual operating costs to the City’s operating budget. Operating costs are addressed in the Environmental Services portion of the Community Development and Public Works Department operating budget. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 222 LOCAL REVITALIZATION FUND (330)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: City Downtown Public Parking Lot Reconfiguration Project No: cp1616 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Ingrid Gaub Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Local Revitalization Fund 330 17,329 - 245,000 - 262,329 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other -Contributions - - - - - 17,329 - 245,000 - 262,329 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 17,329 - 245,000 - 262,329 17,329 - 245,000 - 262,329 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Local Revitalization Fund 330 - - - - 245,000 Grants- Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET - - - - - Other -Contributions - - - - - - - - - 245,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 245,000 - - - - 245,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Reconfigure the City owned public parking lot between Safeway and Main Street to address pedestrian and vehicular circulation; remove existing landscaping to allow more flexibility in the parking lot redesign; explore whether more parking stalls can be added to the lot to aid in providing additional customer parking within Downtown Auburn; and resurface the parking lot. Progress Summary: Monies to improve the parking lot adjacent to Safeway and the B Street Plaza were used to create safety and aesthetic improvements to the plaza. New catenary lighting and planters were added to the plaza as a short- to medium-term improvement. The lighting increases safety and the planters were added to delineate walking paths and create visual interest. Completion of design and construction is delayed until the Heritage Building is addressed. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None anticipated as the City already maintains the parking lot. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 223 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND (328)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Capital Projects Fund Project Title: Local Revitalization Project No: Project Type: Project Manager: Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - Grants - Secured (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - REET 2 457,909 220,600 225,000 223,700 903,509 457,909 220,600 225,000 223,700 903,509 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 457,909 220,600 225,000 223,700 903,509 457,909 220,600 225,000 223,700 903,509 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Fund Balance - - - - - Grants - - - - - REET 2 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Construction - - - - - Long-Term Debt Service 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 222,000 219,800 222,300 219,200 1,332,000 To pay debt service costs on 2010 General Obligation bonds issued for the Downtown Promenade improvements. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: N/A Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 224 TABLE CI-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 104th Ave. Park Development 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ 12,500$ 75,000$ 2 AEP Boardwalk -Phase 2 - - - 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000 3 City Street Light LED Retrofit (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (150,000) (900,000) Total (137,500)$ (137,500)$ (137,500)$ (127,500)$ (127,500)$ (127,500)$ (795,000)$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 225 AIRPORT Current Facilities The City of Auburn operates the Auburn Municipal Airport, providing hangar and tie-down facilities/leasing space for aircraft-related businesses. As of 2017, there were approximately 142,000 take-offs and landings (aircraft operations) at the airport annually. Table A-1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities with current capacity and location. The Airport Master Plan was completed in May 2015 for the period 2012 through 2032. Level of Service (LOS) The Auburn Municipal Airport Master Plan provides a maximum runway capacity (LOS standard) of 231,000 aircraft operations annually; one take-off or landing equals one aircraft operation. This LOS is recognized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The FAA requires the airport to have the capital facilities capacity (i.e., runways, taxiways, holding areas, terminal, hangars, water/sewer system, etc.) necessary to accommodate 100% of aircraft operations during any one year. By 2022, the Airport Master Plan forecasts the number of operations to be 198,623 – well below the capacity of the airport runway. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s Airport facilities include ten non-capacity projects totaling $16,491,360. These include the Runway/Taxiway Rehab, RSA grading & Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) project, hangar facility construction project, open T-hangar upgrades, and Airport office/middle ramp reconfigure project. Table A-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by individual worksheets showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets As Table A-3 shows, operating budget impacts of $12,000 are forecasted for Airport facilities during the six years 2022 – 2027. TABLE A-1 Facilities Inventory Airport FACILITY # of Aircraft # of Feet LOCATION Existing Inventory: Hangars (Public)145 2143 E Street NE Hangars (Private)103 2143 E Street NE Tiedowns 153 2143 E Street NE Runway 3,841 2143 E Street NE Total Existing Inventory 401 3,841 Proposed Capacity Projects: Private Hangar Development 23 - 2143 E Street NE Total Proposed Capacity Projects 23 - 2026 Projected Inventory Total 424 3,841 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 226 TABLE A-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING AIRPORT 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Capacity Projects: None - Page Non-Capacity Projects: 228 Annual Repair and Maintenance of Airport Facilities Capital Costs 100,000 150,000 500,000 100,000 200,000 238,800 1,288,800 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 100,000 150,000 500,000 100,000 200,000 238,800 1,288,800 Grants - - - - - - - 229 Jet A Fueling Facility Capital Costs - 50,000 350,000 - - - 400,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - 25,000 175,000 - - - 200,000 Other Agencies - 25,000 175,000 - - - 200,000 Grants - - - - - - - 230 AWOS, Beacon & Emergency Generator Capital Costs - - - 111,110 1,050,000 - 1,161,110 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - 5,555 52,500 - 58,055 Grants - - - 105,555 997,500 - 1,103,055 231 Annual Airport Pavement Maintenance Capital Costs 25,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 100,000 275,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund 25,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 100,000 275,000 Grants - - - - - - - 232 Hangar Facility Construction Capital Costs 2,750,000 - - - - - 2,750,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds 2,750,000 - - - - - 2,750,000 233 Open T-Hangar Upgrades Capital Costs - 1,060,900 - - - - 1,060,900 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - - - - Bond Proceeds - 1,060,900 - - - - 1,060,900 234 Runway/Taxiway Rehab, RSA Grading & PAPI project Capital Costs - 444,440 3,111,110 - - - 3,555,550 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - 22,220 155,555 - - - 177,775 Grants - 422,220 2,955,555 - - - 3,377,775 235 Property Access to Airport Capital Costs - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants - - - - - - - City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 227 TABLE A-2 (continued) 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Non-Capacity Projects: 236 Precision Instrument Approach Capital Costs - 25,000 25,000 - - - 50,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - 25,000 25,000 - - - 50,000 Other Agencies - - - - - - - 237 Airport Office / Middle Ramp Reconfigure Capital Costs - - 75,000 75,000 5,750,000 - 5,900,000 Funding Sources: Airport Fund - - 7,500 7,500 575,000 - 590,000 Other Agencies - - 67,500 67,500 5,175,000 - 5,310,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 2,875,000 1,780,340 4,061,110 336,110 7,100,000 338,800 16,491,360 Total Costs 2,875,000 1,780,340 4,061,110 336,110 7,100,000 338,800 16,491,360 FUNDING SOURCES: Airport Fund 125,000 272,220 863,055 163,055 927,500 338,800 2,689,630 Other Agencies - 25,000 242,500 67,500 5,175,000 - 5,510,000 Bond Proceeds 2,750,000 1,060,900 - - - - 3,810,900 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 422,220 2,955,555 105,555 997,500 - 13,601,730 Total Funding 2,875,000 1,780,340 4,061,110 336,110 7,100,000 338,800 16,491,360 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 228 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Repair and Maintenance of Airport Facilities Project No:apbd05, cp1931 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Years)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue 9,211 190,789 100,000 150,000 300,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - 9,211 190,789 100,000 150,000 300,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 20,000 20,000 25,000 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 9,211 170,789 80,000 125,000 260,000 9,211 190,789 100,000 150,000 300,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 500,000 100,000 200,000 238,800 1,288,800 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - 500,000 100,000 200,000 238,800 1,288,800 Capital Expenditures: Design 100,000 20,000 40,000 45,000 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 400,000 80,000 160,000 193,800 1,038,800 500,000 100,000 200,000 238,800 1,288,800 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Due to the current conditions of the Facilities at the Airport, this program provides for necessary maintenance and repair work such as slab sealing, roof replacement, hangar beam replacement, painting, electrical repairs, etc. for buildings identified in the 2018 Facility Condition Assessment as being in "Fair" to "Good" condition. Repair and maintenance of these facilities will help prolong the service life of these buildings. Progress Summary: Program began in 2017. In 2018, a Facilities Condition Assessment was completed. Future Impact on Operating Budget: This project will decrease the need for more costly repairs and maintenance on older buildings. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 229 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Jet A Fueling Facility Project No:apbd04 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Ingrid Gaub Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - 25,000 Other Agencies - - - 25,000 - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - 50,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 50,000 - - - - 50,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 175,000 - - - 200,000 Other Agencies 175,000 - - - 200,000 State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - 350,000 - - - 400,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction 350,000 - - - 400,000 350,000 - - - 400,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: Construct any necessary site improvements to accommodate a temporary 2,000 gallon fueling truck for Jet A fuel on site in 2018. Design and Construct a permanent 12,000 gallon Fuel Tank for Jet A service at Airport in 2022 and 2023 after the runway extension is complete and demand for Jet A fuel is established. 50% split of funding between the airport and a private party. Progress Summary: Due to the delay on the completion of the Runway, this project has been moved to 2022. Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 230 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: AWOS, Beacon & Emergency Generator Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:Ingrid Gaub Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Federal - Non-Primary Entitlements - - - - - Federal- Unsecured - - - - - State Grant -Unsecured - - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 5,555 52,500 - 58,055 Federal - Non-Primary Entitlements - 100,000 200,000 - 300,000 Federal- Unsecured - - 745,000 - 745,000 State Grant -Unsecured - 5,555 52,500 - 58,055 - 111,110 1,050,000 - 1,161,110 Capital Expenditures: Design - 111,110 225,000 - 336,110 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 825,000 - 825,000 - 111,110 1,050,000 - 1,161,110 Grants / Other Sources:Federal Aviation Administration and Washington State Department of Transportation Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will fund the environmental, design and construction of an Automated Weather Observation System (AWOS), Beacon and emergency generator. This will be funded at 90% by the FAA Progress Summary: After discussion with the FAA this project was expanded to include beacon and emergency generator expenses. Future Impact on Operating Budget: $2,000 annually for on-going maintenance and repair City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 231 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Annual Airport Pavement Maintenance Project No:apbd12 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Tim Mensonides Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 25,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - - 25,000 25,000 50,000 25,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 2,000 2,000 5,000 4,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 23,000 23,000 45,000 46,000 - 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 50,000 50,000 100,000 275,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other - - - - - - 50,000 50,000 100,000 275,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 5,000 5,000 10,000 27,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 45,000 45,000 90,000 248,000 - 50,000 50,000 100,000 275,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will completed pavement maintenance and preservation activities for the Airport Runway, Taxiways and other paved surfaces at the Auburn Airport to maintain the facilities in adequate operational conditions Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 232 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Hangar Facility Construction Project No:apbd10, cp1932 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - 50,000 - - 50,000 Bond Revenue - - 2,750,000 - 2,750,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - 50,000 2,750,000 - 2,800,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - 50,000 250,000 - 300,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - 2,500,000 - 2,500,000 - 50,000 2,750,000 - 2,800,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Bond Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 250,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 2,500,000 - - - - 2,750,000 There is significant demand for hangar space in the Puget Sound region. The airport currently has a hangar wait list with over 90 names on it. This project would construct a new row of T hangars on the Airport's southeast tie down ramp. Progress Summary: Working with our consultant on the type of hangar facilities needed at the Airport and a refined estimated cost. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Utilization of 3.8 million dollar bond issued in 2021 to fund construction. In 2022 hangar revenues increase $204,000 annually. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 233 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Open T-Hangar Upgrades Project No:apbd14 Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Bond Revenue - - - 1,060,900 - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - 1,060,900 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - 1,060,900 - - - - 1,060,900 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Bond Revenue - - - - 1,060,900 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - - 1,060,900 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - 1,060,900 - - - - 1,060,900 Due to the current conditions of the hangar facilities at the Airport, this program will replace or upgrade hangar facilities as they reach the end of their service life. A Facility Condition Assessment was completed in 2018. In 2019 an in depth analysis of the hangars' structure and roofing was conducted with a recommendation to not replace but upgrade the structures. The demand on the airport is greater for closed hangars vs open units. This project will convert 2 open rows to closed hangars and increase airport revenues at approximately $100,000 annually. This will allow for 2 open rows to remain on the airport and provide greater hangar options for airport tenants. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: Utilization of 3.8 million dollar bond issued in 2021 to fund construction. In 2023 hangar revenues increase $100,000 annually. Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 234 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Runway/Taxiway Rehab, RSA Grading & PAPI project Project No:apbd13 Project Type: Non-Capacity Project Manager: Tim Mensonides Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - 22,220 Federal -Non Primary Entitlement - - - 400,000 Grants unsecured -Federal - - - - - Grants unsecured - State - - - 22,220 - - - - 444,440 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 444,440 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 444,440 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 155,555 - - - 177,775 Federal -Non Primary Entitlement 200,000 - - - 600,000 Grants unsecured -Federal 2,600,000 - - - 2,600,000 Grants unsecured - State 155,555 - - - 177,775 3,111,110 - - - 3,555,550 Capital Expenditures: Design 466,600 - - - 911,040 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 2,644,510 - - - 2,644,510 3,111,110 - - - 3,555,550 Grants / Other Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will complete a Fog seal of on the Airport Taxiways to extend the life of the pavement and complete rehabilitation of the Runway to prolong the useful life of the Runway. This project will also complete necessary improvements to the property purchased from the Park and Ride to be in compliance with the FAA requirements for the Runway Safety Area. In addition the project will install Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway to replace aging Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) system. Progress Summary: After discussion with the FAA this project combined the Runway/Taxiway Rehab, the RSA Grading and the PAPI project into one project as part of the 2021 -2026 Capital Facilities Plan. Future Impact on Operating Budget: $2,000 annually for PAPI on-going maintenance and repair City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 235 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Property Access to Airport Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non-Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - 50,000 - 50,000 Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - 50,000 - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - 50,000 - 50,000 Enter into a through the fence agreement for access to the Airport. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 236 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Precision Instrument Approach Project No:apbd15 Project Type:Non -Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - 25,000 - Bond Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - 25,000 - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - 25,000 - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - 25,000 - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 25,000 - - - 50,000 Bond Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - 25,000 - - - 50,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 25,000 - - - 50,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 25,000 - - - 50,000 Approval process with the FAA to improve the airport's instrument approach. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 237 AIRPORT FUND (465)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Airport Office / Middle Ramp Reconfigure Project No:cpxxx Project Type:Non -Capacity Project Manager:TBD Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Airport Revenue - - - - - Bond Revenue - - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)- - - - - - - - - - Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - - - - - - Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Airport Revenue 7,500 7,500 575,000 - 590,000 Bond Revenue - - - - Grants (Fed,State,Local)- - - - - Other (Public/Private Partnership)67,500 67,500 5,175,000 - 5,310,000 75,000 75,000 5,750,000 - 5,900,000 Capital Expenditures: Design 75,000 75,000 - - 150,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - 5,750,000 - 5,750,000 75,000 75,000 5,750,000 - 5,900,000 This project will reconfigure the Airport office and parking lot area to allow for additional development of an Airport based aviation business /restaurant. 10/90% split with the airport and private party. Progress Summary: Future Impact on Operating Budget: None Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 238 TABLE A-3 Impact on Future Operating Budgets AIRPORT Project:2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total 1 Automated Weather Observation System, Beacon & Emergency Generator -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 4,000$ 2 Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) for Runway - - 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 8,000 Total -$ -$ 2,000$ 2,000$ 4,000$ 4,000$ 12,000$ City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 239 CEMETERY Current Facilities The City owns two cemeteries. The Mountain View Cemetery is a fully developed facility (60 acres and five buildings) that provides burial services and related merchandise for the community. The Pioneer Cemetery is a historic cemetery that is no longer used for burial purposes. Table C-1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 33 burial plots/niches and cremation in ground plots per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory divided by the estimated 2021 citywide population of 83,005. The proposed LOS of 33 burial and plots/niches and cremation in ground plots per 1,000 population is based on the projected inventory divided by the 2026-projected citywide population of 87,239. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The City’s Mountain View Cemetery facilities includes one capital projects costing $395,000 to build a new mausoleum. Table C-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by the worksheet showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecast for the cemetery during the six years 2022 – 2027. TABLE C-1 Facilities Inventory Cemetery CAPACITY FACILITY # of Plots/Niches LOCATION Existing Inventory: Mountain View Cemetery 2,771 2020 Mountain View Dr. Pioneer Cemetery - 8th & Auburn Way No. Total Existing Inventory 2,771 Proposed Capacity Projects: New Development - Burial Plots 96 Total Proposed Capacity Projects 96 2025 Projected Inventory Total 2,867 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 240 TABLE C-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING CEMETERY 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Page Capacity Projects: 241 Mausoleum Building Capital Costs 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 Funding Sources: Cemetery Fund 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 Cemetery Endowed Care - - - - - - - SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 Non-Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Total Costs 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Cemetery Fund 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 Cemetery Endowed Care - - - - - - - Total Funding 40,000 - 355,000 - - - 395,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 241 CEMETERY FUND (466)Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Enterprise Funds Project Title: Mausoleum Building Project No:cp1831 Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Craig Hudson Description: Activity: 2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Unrestricted Cemetery Revenue 2,250 10,000 40,000 - 52,250 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Cemetery Endowed Care - - - - - 2,250 10,000 40,000 - 52,250 Capital Expenditures: Design 2,250 10,000 40,000 - 52,250 Right of Way - - - - - Construction - - - - - 2,250 10,000 40,000 - 52,250 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Unrestricted Cemetery Revenue 355,000 - - - 395,000 Bond Proceeds - - - - - Cemetery Endowed Care - - - - - 355,000 - - - 395,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - 40,000 Right of Way - - - - - Construction 355,000 - - - 355,000 355,000 - - - 395,000 Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Forecasted Project Cost: Total Funding Sources: This project will design and construct a 72 crypt and 48 niche mausoleum for above ground internment option. The public has expressed desire to have this option available as the current mausoleum is at capacity. Progress Summary: Project design is planned to be completed in 2021 and construction to begin in 2023. Future Impact on Operating Budget: City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 242 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 243 FIRE PROTECTION Current Facilities The Valley Regional Fire Authority provides fire protection and rescue services to a 40-square mile area which includes the City of Auburn, the City of Algona, the City of Pacific and King County Fire Protection District 31. The Valley Regional Fire Authority operates out of five stations, which are manned 24 hours per day. The North Station #31 also serves as the department headquarters and includes a hose and training tower. Each station is assigned fire apparatus (Engines and Aid Vehicles). Table F–1 “Facilities Inventory” lists the facilities along with their current capacity and location. Level of Service (LOS) The current LOS of 0.20 fire apparatus per 1,000 population is based on the existing inventory (17 fire apparatus) divided by the 2021 citywide population estimate of 83,005. The proposed LOS of 0.21 fire apparatus per 1,000 is based on the 2026-planned inventory (18 fire apparatus) divided by the 2026-projected citywide population of 87,239. Capital Facilities Projects and Financing The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one capital project at a cost of $1,625,000 for fire apparatus enhancements and improvements. Table F-2 shows the proposed financing plan followed by an individual worksheet showing the project detail. Impact on Future Operating Budgets There are no operating budget impacts forecasted for fire protection during the six years 2022 – 2027. City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 244 TABLE F-1 Facilities Inventory Valley Regional Fire Authority FACILITY Fire Apparatus Aid Vehicles LOCATION Existing Inventory: Stations: North Station #31 1101 'D' Street NE, Auburn First Line 2 1 Reserve - 1 South Station #32 1951 'R' Street SE, Auburn First Line 1 1 Reserve 1 1 Lakeland Station #33 500 182nd Ave E, Auburn First Line 1 - Reserve 1 - Lea Hill Station #34 31290 124th Ave SE, Auburn First Line 1 - Brush Truck 1 - Reserve 1 - GSA Station #35 2815 C St SW, Auburn Reserve 1 1 Pacific Station #38 133 3rd Ave SE, Pacific First Line 1 - Reserve 1 - Total Existing Inventory 12 5 Proposed Inventory Additions: First Line 1 - Total Proposed Capacity Projects 1 - 2025 Projected Inventory Total 13 5 CAPACITY City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 245 TABLE F-2 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN PROJECTS AND FINANCING VALLEY REGIONAL FIRE AUTHORITY 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Total Capacity Projects: Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements & Improvements Capital Costs 75,000 1,250,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 Funding Sources: Grants - - - - - - - Other Proceeds (VRFA)- 750,000 - - - - 750,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees 75,000 500,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 875,000 SUMMARY: CAPITAL COSTS Capacity Projects - - - - - - - Non-Capacity Projects 75,000 1,250,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 Total Costs 75,000 1,250,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 FUNDING SOURCES: Grants (Fed,State,Local)- 750,000 - - - - 750,000 Impact/Mitigation Fees 75,000 500,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 875,000 Total Funding 75,000 1,250,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 City of Auburn Draft Capital Facilities Plan 246 Valley Regional Fire Authority Capital Facilities Plan Six Year Capital Facilities Plan, 2021-2026 Project Title: Fire Station Facility Relocation, Enhancements & Improvements Project No:cpxxxx Project Type:Capacity Project Manager:Mark Horaski Description: Activity: (Previous 2 Yrs.)2020 YE 2021 Year End Funding Sources:Prior to 2020 Estimate 2021 Budget 2022 Budget Project Total Grants - - - - - Other Proceeds (VRFA)- - - 750,000 - Impact/Mitigation Fees 50,000 75,000 75,000 500,000 200,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 1,250,000 200,000 Capital Expenditures: Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Aerial Apparatus Acquisition 50,000 75,000 75,000 1,250,000 200,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 1,250,000 200,000 Total 2023 2024 2025 2026 2021-2026 Funding Sources: Grants - - - - - Other Proceeds (VRFA)- - - - - Impact/Mitigation Fees 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 875,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 875,000 Capital Expenditures:- Design - - - - - Right of Way - - - - - Aerial Apparatus Acquisition 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,625,000 Facility Improvement projects are identified and prioritized annually and are subject to delay to accommodate emergency repairs. The Valley Regional Fire Authority includes one project for apparatus enhancements and improvements. Progress Summary: Fire mitigation and impact fees will be transferred to the Valley Regional Fire Authority to pay for apparatus enhancements and improvements. Future Impact on Operating Budget: Total Funding Sources: Total Expenditures: Total Expenditures: Total Funding Sources: Forecasted Project Cost: None -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 19 Exhibit F Transportation Element 12/xx/202 0 Adopted by Ordinance No. xxxx City of Auburn 12/xx/2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 1 Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 HOW THE CITY USES THE PLAN .................................................................................................... 4 1.3 REGIONAL COORDINATION .......................................................................................................... 7 1.4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE THE LAST PLAN (2015) ................................................................... 11 1.5 PLAN ORGANIZATION ................................................................................................................ 13 1.6 STAFF RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................... 13 CHAPTER 2 – THE STREET SYSTEM ............................................................................................................. 15 2.1 EXISTING STREET SYSTEM ................................................................................................................ 15 2.2 STREET STANDARDS AND LEVELS-OF-SERVICE ................................................................................ 22 2.3 FUTURE STREET SYSTEM .................................................................................................................. 28 CHAPTER 3 - NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION .................................................................................. 46 3.1 PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL ........................................................................................................................ 47 3.2 BICYCLE TRAVEL ................................................................................................................................ 54 3.3 FUTURE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM ................................................................................................ 59 CHAPTER 4 – TRANSIT ................................................................................................................................ 62 4.1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT ......................................................................................................................... 62 4.2 TRANSIT USER NEEDS ....................................................................................................................... 66 4.3 TRANSIT SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................................................... 71 CHAPTER 5 – POLICIES ................................................................................................................................ 73 5.1 COORDINATION, PLANNING, AND IMPLEMENTATION ................................................................... 73 5.2 STREET SYSTEM ................................................................................................................................ 81 5.3 NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM ............................................................................................................... 86 5.4 TRANSIT SYSTEM .............................................................................................................................. 89 5.5 AIR TRANSPORTATION ..................................................................................................................... 90 CHAPTER 6 – FUNDING ............................................................................................................................... 92 6.1 FINANCIAL PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING ................................................................................. 92 6.2 FUNDING SOURCES .......................................................................................................................... 93 6.3 REVENUE SHORTFALL CONTINGENCY .............................................................................................. 98 6.4 FUNDING STRATEGIES, PROJECT PRIORITIZATION.......................................................................... 98 CHAPTER 7 – MONITORING AND EVALUATION ...................................................................................... 100 7.1 ANNUAL UPDATES .......................................................................................................................... 100 7.2 MULTI-YEAR UPDATES ................................................................................................................... 101 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 2 CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION Auburn Station The transportation system is a vital component of Auburn's social, economic, and physical structure. The primary purpose of the transportation system is to support the movement of people and goods within the City and connect the City to the broader region. Secondarily, it influences patterns of growth, development, and economic activity by providing access to adjacent land uses. Planning for the development and maintenance of the transportation system is a critical activity promoting the efficient movement of people and goods, ensuring emergency access, and optimizing the role transportation plays in attaining other community objectives. 1.1 PURPOSE The Comprehensive Transportation Plan is the framework for transportation planning in Auburn. It functions as the overarching guide for changes to the transportation system. The Plan evaluates the existing system by identifying key assets and improvement needs. These findings are then incorporated into a needs assessment, which guides the future of the transportation system. This Plan is multi-modal, addressing multiple forms of transportation in Auburn including the street network, non-motorized travel, and transit. Evaluating all modes enables the City to address its future transportation needs in a comprehensive and balanced manner. VISION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan reflects the current and future needs of the Auburn community and, in doing so, seeks to:  Enhance the quality of life for all Auburn residents; 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 3  Encourage healthy community principles through non-motorized travel;  Promote a transportation system that supports local businesses and enhances economic development opportunities;  Create a transportation system that is efficient, uncomplicated, and welcoming to visitors; and  Provide a balanced, multi-modal transportation system that addresses both local and regional needs. GMA REQUIREMENTS Washington State’s 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) requires that transportation planning be directly tied to the City’s land use decisions and fiscal planning. This is traditionally accomplished through the adoption of the Transportation Element of the Comprehensive Plan. Auburn fulfills this mandate by adopting the Comprehensive Transportation Plan as the Transportation Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. In order to be GMA compliant, the Comprehensive Transportation Plan must:  Inventory the existing transportation system in order to identify existing capital facilities and travel levels as a basis for future planning;  Identify level-of-service (LOS) standards for all arterials, transit routes, and state-owned facilities as a gauge for evaluating system performance;  Specify actions and requirements for bringing into compliance locally owned transportation facilities or services that are below an established level-of-service standard;  Determine existing deficiencies of the system;  Use land use assumptions to estimate future travel, including impacts to state-owned facilities;  Identify future improvement needs from at least ten years of traffic forecasts based on the adopted land use plan;  Include a multiyear financing plan based on the identified needs;  Address intergovernmental coordination; and  Include transportation demand management strategies. DISCLOSURES In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), the City of Auburn will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disability in its services, programs, or activities. Modifications to Policies and Procedures: City of Auburn will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all of its programs, services, and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City of Auburn offices, even where pets are generally prohibited. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 4 1.2 HOW THE CITY USES THE PLAN The Comprehensive Transportation Plan provides policy and technical direction for development of the City’s transportation system through the year 2035. It updates and expands the 2015 Comprehensive Transportation Plan by recognizing network changes since the last plan, evaluating current needs, and identifying standards for future development, and various infrastructure improvement scenarios. Major updates are required every 8 years. The next major update is required to be adopted by June 20243. NEEDS ASSESSMENT A system-wide, multi-modal needs assessment was conducted throughout plan development to ascertain which aspects of Auburn’s existing transportation system work well and which ones need improvement. An evaluation of potential solutions and investment priorities was also conducted as part of this process. The end result is that Auburn has a more thorough understanding of system deficiencies, how best to address these deficiencies, and direction for expanding the system in a sustainable manner. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Public outreach is an important component of the ongoing needs assessment process. Throughout the year 2014, the City held a number of community meetings through the Imagine Auburn visioning. Process, for the major update adopted in 2015. The meetings included discussions of capital investments in transportation infrastructure and other transportation related issues which have been incorporated into this document. As part of the adoption process, the Plan is also reviewed by the City of Auburn Planning Commission, including a hearing where members of the public are provided the opportunity to provide input on the plan, which is then reviewed and adopted by the City Council. POLICY DEVELOPMENT The City creates policies to state preferences for preservation of the existing system and development of the future transportation system. Policies can be qualitative in nature, but often they are quantitative and prescribe a specific standard. Policies are also important for communicating the City’s values and needs to neighboring jurisdictions and regional and state agencies. Having established policies in place enables the City to more effectively influence change in keeping with its needs and objectives. LOS AND CONCURRENCY The concurrency provisions of the 1990 Growth Management Act (GMA) require that local governments permit development only if adequate public facilities exist, or can be guara nteed 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 5 to be available within six years, to support new development. The GMA requires each local jurisdiction to identify facility and service needs based on level-of- service (LOS) standards. Auburn ensures that future development will not cause the system ’s performance to fall below the adopted LOS standard by doing one or a combination of the following: limiting development, requiring appropriate mitigation, or changing the adopted standard. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN AND TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The City uses the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) to develop a financial plan for capital improvements in Auburn, thus enabling the City to fulfill the GMA requirement of having a multiyear financing plan based on the identified transportation needs. The TIP, is a financial planning tool used to implement the list of transportation improvement projects identified in the Transportation Plan. It is a six-year plan which is reviewed and updated annually by the City Council to reflect changes to project priorities and funding circumstances. Generally, the projects included in the TIP are financially constrained such that the estimated projects costs do not exceed the anticipated funding available in the 6 -yeaar period. An exception are capacity projects funded by Transportation Impact Fees (also referred to as Traffic Impact Fees). The first three years of traffic impact fee funded projects included in the plan are fiscally constrained based on conservative growth projections. The last three years of traffic impact fee funded projects in the plan include additional projects that provide for growth beyond those accounted for by conservative growth projections. This results in a plan to implement projects to accommodate additional growth should it occur. The traffic impact fee funded projects included in the TIP are utilized to prepare annual updates to the traffic impact fee schedule. Traffic impact fees on new development are determined by the cost of the capacity projects included in the TIP. The Capital Facilities Plan is also an annually adopted six-year financing plan. However, it is not fiscally constrained for all six years. Unlike the TIP, the CFP is an adopted element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. ADA COMPLIANCE The City is committed to providing public infrastructure without barriers to those with disabilities and achieving compliance with the American with Disabilities Act (ADA). According to ADA local governments must develop a transition plan describing how it will ensure its facilities, services, programs and activities are accessible. The transition plan:  Identifies physical barriers that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities.  Describes the methods that will be used to remove the barriers.  Provides an estimated schedule for taking the steps necessary to achieve compliance. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 6  Identifies the city official responsible for implementation and provides information on how to file a grievance or complaint. In 2020, The City completed The City is in the process of developing an ADA Transition Plan for the Public Right-of-way that will summarizes the City’s policies and standards guiding right-of- way maintenance and improvements to pursue full compliance with ADA. The ADA Transition Plan will documents internal design standards and specifications, development of a schedule and budget, and a step to monitor the process outlined in the plan. The ADA Transition Plan for the Public Right of Way addresses the public right of way (ROW) of the City of Auburn, which typically includes vehicular and bicycle roadway lanes, sidewalks, roadside trails, street landscape areas, crosswalks, and traffic signals. TITLE VI COMPLIANCE Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Federal-aid Highway Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin, or sex in any program or activity that receives Federal funds or other Federal financial assistance. Programs that receive Federal funds cannot distinguish among individuals on the basis of race, color or national origin, or sex either directly or indirectly, in the types, quantity, quality or timeliness of program services, aids or benefits that they provide or the manner in which they provide them. This prohibition applies to intentional discrimination as well as to procedures, criteria or methods of administration that appear neutral but have a discriminatory effect on individuals because of their race, color, or national origin, or sex. Policies and practices that have such an effect must be eliminated unless a recipient can show that they were necessary to achieve a legitimate nondiscriminatory objective. Even if there is such a reason the practice cannot continue if there are alternatives that would achieve the same objectives but that would exclude fewer minorities. Persons with limited English proficiency must be afforded a meaningful opportunity to participate in programs that receive Federal funds. Policies and practices may not deny or have the effect of denying persons with limited English proficiency equal access to Federally- funded programs for which such persons qualify. The City of Auburn, Washington, assures that no person shall on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex, as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 , and Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259) be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. The City further assures every effort will be made to ensure non -discrimination in all of its programs and activities, whether those programs and activities are federally funded or not. The Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 broadened the scope of Title VI coverage by expanding the definition of the terms “programs or activityies” to include all of the operations of programs or activities of City of Auburn, 2018 Annual Title VI Report. Federal Aid recipients, sub-recipients, and contractors/consultants, whether such programs and activities are federally assisted or not (Public Law 100259 [S.557] March 22, 1988.). 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 7 The City will include Title VI language in all written agreements and will monitor for compliance. The City’s Director of Human Resources is responsible for initiating and monitoring Title VI activities, preparing reports and other responsibilities as required by 23 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 200 and 49 Code of Federal Regulation 21. The Title VI Non-Discrimination Agreement between the City and the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) requires the City to prepare a yearly report of Title VI accomplishments for the last year and goals for the upcomingnext year. The agreement and annual report are published on the City’s website. . and year the annual report can be found published on the City’s website. 1.3 REGIONAL COORDINATION In addition to being influenced by factors within the City, Auburn’s transportation system is influenced by what happens beyond its City limits: growth in neighboring communities, infrastructure maintenance by regional agencies, the lack of funding for road m aintenance, new capacity projects, and competing demands for transit services. This Plan calls for effective inter- jurisdictional actions to address cross-border issues and to mitigate the impact of new development. The Plan also recognizes that other jurisdictions, particularly state agencies and transit providers, are responsible for a major share of the transportation facilities serving Auburn. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) has jurisdiction over three major routes connecting Auburn to the region: SR-167, SR-18, and SR-164 (Auburn Way South). Auburn coordinates with WSDOT to study these corridors and implement roadway improvements. WSDOT also serves an important role as administrator of federal and state transportation funds. SOUND TRANSIT Sound Transit provides a variety of regional transit services for King, Snohomish, and Pierce counties. In Auburn, Sound Transit provides commuter rail and express bus service. The Auburn Station also serves as a hub and transfer station for local transit service provided by King County Metro Transit and Pierce Transit. The transit chapter provides more detail on current Sound Transit services, remaining needs for regional transit service, and the role Auburn plays in coordinating with the agency. KING COUNTY King County Metro Transit, formerly a division of the King County Department of 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 8 Transportation, is now the King County Transit Department. The King County Transit Department provides local bus service for the Auburn area. Planned service for the City of Auburn is described in the Metro Strategic Plan for Public Transportation 2011 -2021, and in Metro Connects Long Range Public Transportation Plan, which was adopted by the King County Council in 2017. The City has developed an employee Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program in cooperation with King County Transit. Details of the CTR program are summarized in the Non-motorized and Transit chapters of this plan. Auburn partners with King County Transit on the 497 bus route, which provides peak hour service from Lakeland Hills to the Auburn Station. Auburn and King County Transit hope to continue this relationship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in Auburn. King County Road Services Division is responsible for maintaining and regulating the roadway network in King County, including the Totem and Klump portions of King County located inside the City limits. King County Road Services has a number of programs and plans in place that regulate development and other activities affecting their roadway network. PIERCE COUNTY Auburn partners with Pierce Transit on the 497 bus route, which provides peak hour service from Lakeland Hills to the Auburn Station. Auburn and Pierce Transit hope to continue this relationship and develop future partnerships to expand transit service in Auburn. COUNTYWIDE PLANNING POLICIES Under the Growth Management Act, King and Pierce Counties have adopted Countywide Planning Policies to guide development in both incorporated and unincorporated areas of their jurisdictions. The policies support county and regional goals to provide a variety of mobility options and establish LOS standards that emphasize the efficient movement of people and not just vehicles. The Countywide Planning Policies are also important because they provide direction for planning and development of potential annexation areas. PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) sets policy for King, Pierce, Kitsap, and Snohomish counties through its long-range planning document, Vision 2040, and its regional transportation plan, Transportation 2040. Both documents encourage future growth to be concentrated in regional growth centers. They also seek to provide a multi-modal transportation system that serves all travel modes, actively encouraging the use of alternatives to single occupant vehicles. Another important policy theme is a focus on maximizing the efficiency of the transportation system through transportation demand management (TDM) and transportation system management (TSM) strategies, as well as completing critical links in the network. Currently, PSRC is working on a Draft document for Vision 2050, which is an update of Vision 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 9 2040. Vision 2050 is expected to be adopted by their Executive Board in 2020. Auburn’s Transportation Plan is required to be consistent with PSRC’s regional planning efforts. ADJACENT CITIES The City recognizes the importance of coordinated and strong inter-jurisdictional action because transportation impacts do not stop at local boundaries. The City works closely with neighboring cities and the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to address transportation issues. These neighbors adopt goals and policies that directly impact Auburn. In developing this plan, analysis was undertaken to ensure that all transportation system improvements are compatible with neighboring jurisdictions. CITY OF KENT The City of Kent shares Auburn’s northern border and several regional transportation corridors including S 277th Street, SR 167, and the West Valley Highway. Most recently, Auburn has completed coordination with Kent on the annexation of the S 277th Street from Auburn Way North to the Green River into the City of Auburn to allow the widening of S 277th Street between Auburn Way N and L Street NE. CITY OF FEDERAL WAY The City of Federal Way is located west of Auburn. Several roadways, most notably SR 18, connect Auburn and Federal Way. Auburn and Federal Way regularly coordinate on both motorized and non-motorized roadway improvements affecting both jurisdictions. CITES OF SUMNER/ALGONA/ PACIFIC/BONNEY LAKE The City partners with its southern neighbors in many respects, including street system planning, transit planning, and regional trail planning. Auburn is also working with Sumner, Pacific and Algona on roadway improvement projects, including the recent preservation of Boundary Boulevard in partnership with Algona, and financial suppo rt of Pacific’s project to widen Stewart Road to the west of the White River. The City coordinates primarily with Bonney Lake for provision of water service in the Pierce County portion of the City. However, efforts to coordinate transportation systems and services will likely occur in the future. Partnerships with neighboring cities will continue to be an important factor in successful transportation planning. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 10 Map 1-1 Adjacent Jurisdictions 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 11 MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe (MIT) is situated in the southeastern portion of the City and in unincorporated King County, generally to the east of Auburn Way South (SR-164) and south of SR-18. The Muckleshoot Tribe operates two major attractions in or near Auburn: the Muckleshoot Casino and the White River Amphitheatre. Both of these activity centers generate a large number of vehicle trips. Commercial development on tribal lands is expected to increase in the future and must be evaluated during transportation planning efforts. The City and tribe coordinate on a variety of transportation planning issues, both to accommodate the capacity needs derived from traffic generated by tribal land uses and to ensure the tribe has a functioning transportation system for its members. The City and the Tribe are currently working on a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to partner on pedestrian improvement projects along the Auburn Way South corridor. The Muckleshoot Tribe has developed their own Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, a Transportation Plan and a Tribal Transportation Improvement Program have been created to identify transportation needs and plan for the next seven generations. One theme that is emerging from this effort is the need to build a well-connected internal roadway system on the reservation. Currently, Auburn Way South is the primary route for drivers and pedestrians traveling within the reservation. This extensive internal network will increase transportation efficiency and most importantly improve safety along the Auburn Way South corridor. The Muckleshoot Indian Tribe and the City of Auburn have created a partnership to provide safety improvements along Auburn Way South. These improvements are complete and the City continues to pursue grant and partnership opportunities to complete additional improvements along the corridor. During July 2015, the State Legislature passed a transportation package which included $15 million for the SR 164 East Auburn Access project, which will create and develop an affordable, long-term improvement to congestion and safety issues, while also planning to accommodate future growth in the area. The City is involved in the development of the preferred alternative for this project. The Muckleshoot Tribe runs two publicly available Transit routes along State RouteSR- 164. The Reservation Route runs through the Tribe community, and stops southeast of Les Gove Park. It runs every 30 minutes starting at 7:00am. The Auburn Route Express runs from the Tribe through the City of Auburn, making stops along the way. It runs every hour starting at 7:00am. 1.4 ACCOMPLISHMENTS SINCE THE LAST PLAN (2015) Since 2015, the City has completed numerous transportation improvements, with an emphasis on providing new road capacity, improving pedestrian and bicycle safety, preservation of existing infrastructure, and providing better access to regional transit services including commuter rail. Planned and completed capacity projects are shown on Tables 2-2, 2-4 and Appendix A. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 12 Table 1-1 shows the key non-capacity projects completed since the 2015 plan. In addition to the completed planned capacity projects, additional projects were completed, such as, for example, the I street roundabout at 22nd St NE,, the Auburn Way South sidewalk additions from Dogwood to Hemlock and from 17th St SE to Muckleshoot Plaza, the 277th multimodal path from Auburn Way N to L St, and the F street SE non-motorized improvements, all of which increase road users safety and accessibility. Table 1-1: Transportation Improvements Completed since 2015 # Project Name Location Type of Improvement 1 37th & B St NE Pre-Signal 37th & B St NW Safety 2 Lake Tapps Parkway 8th St E to Lakeland Hills Way Preservation 3 W. Main street Multimodal & ITS improvements W. Main St, W. Valley Hwy, 15th St SW, C St. SW Multimodal & ITS 4 Traffic Signal Safety Improvements Various locations along 15th St. NW, 15th St. NE, Harvey Rd. NE, & Auburn Ave Safety 5 Auburn Way N. Pavement Preservation 22nd St NE to 45th St. NE Preservation, Signal, & Non- Motorized 6 Mini Traffic Circle Elm St. SE & 22nd St. SE Safety 7 Railroad Crossing Improvements C St. SW Safety 8 B St NW Reconstruction 37th St. NW to 49th St. NW Roadway 9 Roundabout I St. NE & 22nd St. NE Safety 10 S. 277th St. Corridor Auburn Way N to L St. NE Roadway & Non- Motorized 11 Auburn Way S. Pedestrian Improvements Dogwood SE to Fir St. SE Non-Motorized 12 2014 Pavement Patch & Overlay Citywide Preservation 13 2015 Pavement Patch and Overlay Citywide Preservation 14 2016 Local Street Reconstruction & Preservation Citywide Preservation 15 2018 Arterial Crack Seal Citywide Preservation 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 13 1.5 PLAN ORGANIZATION The following three chapters are organized according to the three primary transportation modes in Auburn: the street Street system System (Chapter 2), the non Non -motorized system System (Chapter 3), and the transit Transit system System (Chapter 4). Each chapter contains a needs assessment and discussion of the future system, including proposed projects or improvements. The remaining chapters cover subjects pertaining to all three system types. Chapter 5 details the City’s transportation objectives and policies. Chapter 6 discusses funding sources that can be used to finance future network improvements. Chapter 7 identifies a monitoring and evaluation strategy to ensure the document remains relevant and that progress is made towards implementation of the Plan. 1.6 STAFF RESOURCES Implementation of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan requires numerous resources, including staff time. All departments play a role in executing the Plan, but the Public Works Department is the implementation lead. The Public Works Department employs engineers, planners, technical and support staff, and maintenance and operations personnel to maintain and improve the City’s transportation system. Nonetheless, staff performs many functions, and dedicating sufficient resources to carry out the goals of this plan continues to present challenges. Figure 1-1 identifies the basic organization of the Public Works Department, Transportation Program. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 14 Figure 1-1 Transportation Program Staff Resources (2020) DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS CITY ENGINEER/ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER TRANSPORTATION PLANNER (VACANT) ROW SPECIALIST SENIOR TRAFFIC ENGINEER ASSISTANT TRAFFIC ENGINEER ASSISTANT TRAFFIC ENGINEER (VACANT) TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ENGINEER TRAFFIC OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL TECHNICIAN (2 POSITIONS) MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS GENERAL MANAGER STREET / VEGETATION MANAGER STREET SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE WORKER II CDL (6 POSITIONS) MAINTENANCE WORKER I CDL (4 POSITIONS) VEGETATION SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE WORKER II CDL (6 POSITIONS) MAINTENANCE WORKER i CDL (2 POSITIONS) 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 15 CHAPTER 2 – THE STREET SYSTEM The City is served by an extensive street network, which includes highways, arterials, collectors, and local streets. The Auburn transportation system is designed to accommodate all modes of travel. This chapter describes the network and how well it serves the City both existing and future. 2.1 EXISTING STREET SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION The street system functions as a network. Functional classification is the hierarchy by which streets and highways are defined according to the character of service they provide. There are three main classes of streets in Auburn: arterials, collectors, and local streets. Existing street classifications are shown in Map 2-1. All streets have been classified using the Federal Functional Classification system guidelines. No significant changes have been made to the classification of City streets from the previous Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The Auburn Engineering Design Standards identifies design standards for each type of City street, in conformance with WSDOT and AASHTO standards. From a planning perspective, acknowledgment and proper designation of functional classifications allows for the preservation of right-of-way for future transportation corridors, whether the corridor provides access to car, HOV, transit, bike, or pedestrian use. Functional classification helps establish corridors that will provide for the future movement of people and goods, as well as emergency vehicle access. Proper designation is crucial to the planning effort; as development occurs, accommodation for the appropriate transportation corridors should be incorporated into development plans. STATE HIGHWAYS SR- 18 – connects I- 5 to I- 90 through Auburn. Within the City limits, SR- 18 has interchanges with SR- 167, West Valley Highway, C Street, SR- 164/Auburn Way S, Auburn Black Diamond Road, and SE 304th Street providing access to downtown Auburn and Lea Hill. It is classified as both a Highway of Statewide Significance (HSS) and a National Highway System (NHS) route for the entire corridor segment. SR- 18 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within the City limits. SR- 167 - also known as the Valley Freeway, serves as an alternative to I- 5, connecting South King and north Pierce counties to the I- 405 corridor to the north. SR- 167 is designated as both HSS and NHS. Within the City limits, SR- 167 has interchanges with SR- 18, S 277th Street, 15th Street NW, and 15th Street SW. SR- 167 is a full control limited access highway, allowing access only at interchanges within the City limits. SR- 164 - is a 15-mile roadway corridor beginning at the SR- 18 interchange with Auburn Way S. The corridor is aligned southeast through the City, connecting with the Muckleshoot Tribal 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 16 Reservation and White River Amphitheater, and unincorporated King County before terminating in the City of Enumclaw at its junction with SR- 410. SR- 164 is a City street which is part of a State Highway. It is classified as an urban minor arterial by WSDOT, and also a HSS. The City of Auburn classifies it as a principal arterial. SR- 164 does not have the same access restrictions as found on SR- 18 and SR- 167. ARTERIALS Arterials are the highest level of City street classification. There are two types of arterials in Auburn. Principal Arterials are designed to move traffic between locations within the region and connect with the freeway system. Design emphasis is placed on providing movement for both inter- and intra-city traffic. As such, these facilities typically carry the highest traffic volumes, experience the longest vehicle trips, and have the highest speed limits of all City streets. Direct access to adjacent land uses is permitted, although these streets are most likely to have limited access, in an effort to enhance safety along these corridors, and increase capacity for through vehicles. These arterials are the framework street system for the City and usually extend beyond the City limits, connecting with neighboring jurisdictions. They are typically constructed to accommodate five-lanes of traffic with speed limits of 30 to 45 mph. The design year average daily traffic (ADT) is greater than 15,000 vehicles per day. Principal arterials are heavily utilized as bus routes, carrying both local and regional service. Typically, on-street bicycle facilities are not appropriate for Principal Arterials and bicyclists are accommodated on adjacent separated trails or on parallel bicycle routes. Pedestrians are accommodated on sidewalks. Minor Arterials interconnect and augment the principal arterial system by providing access to and from the principal arterials and freeways. They serve moderate length trips with slightly less mobility than principal arterials and distribute traffic to smaller geographic areas. Minor arterials may serve secondary traffic generators such as business centers, neighborhood shopping centers, major parks, multifamily residential areas, medical centers, larger religious institutions, and community activity centers. While minor arterials should not enter neighborhoods, they do provide access between neighborhoods. They are typically constructed to accommodate four to five lanes of traffic with speed limits of 30 to 35 mph and a design year ADT of 10,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. Minor arterials are frequently utilized as bus routes, have sidewalks to comfortably accommodate pedestrians and may include bicycle lanes, as appropriate. COLLECTORS Collectors are a step below arterials in the City classification system. There are three types of collectors in Auburn. Urban Residential Collectors are used to connect local streets and residential neighborhoods to community activity centers and minor and principal arterials. Urban Residential Collectors are typically constructed to accommodate two travel lanes with medians and turn pockets at intersections or two travel lanes with bicycle lanes. The posted speed limit is generally 30 mph 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 17 and the design year ADT is 2,500 to 10,000 vehicles per day. Urban Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for some transit service, including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services. Rustic Residential Collectors are routes located in areas with less intensive land uses associated with the Residential Conservancy land-use designation. They carry traffic between local and arterial streets. Rustic Residential Collectors provide access to all levels of arterials, are typically constructed to accommodate two lanes with gravel shoulders on both sides, and have a speed limit of 30 to 40 mph. The gravel shoulder may be reduced on one side to provide a wider shoulder on the other for bicycle travel. Rustic Residential Collectors do not have sidewalks and generally do not carry transit services except for paratransit and possibly dial-a-ride- transit. The design year ADT is 1,000 to 5,000 vehicles per day. Non-Residential Collectors provide intra-community access by connecting non-residential areas such as industrial and commercial areas to minor and principal arterials. They may s erve neighborhood traffic generators such as stores, elementary schools, religious institutions, clubhouses, small hospitals or clinics, areas of small multifamily developments, as well as other commercial and industrial uses. Non-Residential Collectors are typically constructed to accommodate two lanes and a center two-way left-turn lane, with a speed limit of 30 mph and may include bicycle lanes. The design year ADT is 2,500 to 5,000 vehicles per day. Non- Residential Collectors have sidewalks and may be utilized for some transit service, including dial-a-ride transit and paratransit services. LOCAL STREETS Local Streets are the most common street type in the City. Local streets comprise all facilities not part of one of the higher classification systems. Local streets primarily provide direct access to abutting land and to the higher order streets. Service to through traffic is discouraged. There are four categories of local streets. Urban Local Residential Streets provide access to abutting residential parcels. They offer the lowest level of mobility among all street classifications. The street is designed to conduct traffic between dwelling units and higher order streets. As the lowest order street in the hierarchy, the street usually carries minimal through traffic and includes short streets, cul-de-sacs, and courts. The speed limit is generally 25 mph and the design year ADT is 200 to 1,200 vehicles per day. Urban Local Residential Streets have sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians. Bicyclists may travel either on the sidewalk or within the travel lane depending on their level of comfort. Transit service is generally limited to dial-a- ride transit and paratransit. Rustic Local Residential Streets serve areas associated with the Residential Conservancy zoning designation. They provide access to adjacent land and distributing traffic to and from the arterials, residential collectors, rustic, and local streets. Rustic Local Residential Streets are two - lane roadways with gravel shoulders and a speed limit of 25 mph. The design year ADT is 100 to 1,000 vehicles per day. Because these streets have low traffic volumes, bicyclists can comfortably share the travel lane with motorized vehicles. Since Rustic Local Residential Streets do not have sidewalks, pedestrians walk along the shoulder of the road. Transit service is very infrequent and most likely limited to paratransit and possibly dial-a-ride-transit. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 18 Local Non-Residential Streets provide direct access to higher order classification streets and serve primarily industrial and manufacturing land uses. They offer a lower level of mobility and accommodate heavy vehicle traffic. Typically they have two travel lanes with a speed limit of 25 mph and the design year ADT is 400 to 1,200 vehicles per day. Local Non-Residential Streets have sidewalks to accommodate pedestrians and bicyclists may travel on the shoulder of the road (Class IV bicycle facility), although bicycle travel may not be as comfortable as on Local Residential Streets due to a greater frequency of trucks and other heavy vehicles. Transit service is generally limited to dial-a- ride transit and paratransit. Private Streets can be appropriate for local access in very limited usage. They provide direct access to City streets and should be limited to those streets accessing properties within a planned area and immediately adjacent properties. Private streets at a minimum are built to the same design and construction standards as a local residential street. ALLEYS AND ACCESS TRACTS Alleys provide vehicular access to abutting properties, generally through the rear or side of the property. Alleys can be public or private and serve several purposes including access management and the alleviation of traffic problems on city streets. Alleys should provide through access to city streets or adequate turnaround space if through access is not feasible. Alleys shall be constructed to allow for general-purpose and emergency access at all times. ACCESS TRACTS Access Tracts, sometimes referred to as shared driveways, provide vehicular access for lots that do not abut front a street or alley. They are most common in panhandle lots or rear lots that do not have street or alley access. Access tracts are privately owned and maintained. They must provide for sufficient vehicular movement and turnaround space, be free of temporary and permanent obstructions, and provide for emergency access. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Average daily traffic counts were obtained from data collected during 2013.9 Map 2-2 shows the existing average weekday daily traffic volumes on City arterials. A major contributor to the high traffic volumes on City arterials is traffic passing through the City. This pass-through traffic originates in surrounding jurisdictions and uses City streets to access the major regional highways, such as SR-18 and SR-167. Based on the City’s travel demand model from 2014, Bbetween 25 and 30 percent of all vehicle trips on the Auburn street system begin and end outside the City. The City is committed to working with WSDOT to improve the state highway system, thereby reducing the demand on the City street system. SPEED LIMITS The City designates speed limits as a means of alerting drivers to safe and appropriate travel speeds for a particular corridor segment. Typically, the higher the classification of roadway, the higher the posted speed limit. Except for school zones which are posted at 20 mph when 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 19 children are present, speed limits in the City range from 25 mph (typically for local roads) to 45 mph on some principal arterials. The City routinely monitors corridors to ensure appropriate speed limits are in place. Unless otherwise posted the statutory legal speed limit in the City is 25 mph. TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SIGNS Traffic signals, signs, and pavement markings are used to inform road users, thereby increasing the effective use of the roadway by moving traffic more efficientl y and safely. The City uses the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) as guidance for design, construction, and placement of these design elements in the right of way. FREIGHT Auburn is an important freight hub in the Puget Sound region, and t he efficient movement of freight, through and within the City, is critical to Auburn’s economic stability. Both rail and truck freight, originating largely in the Ports of Tacoma and Seattle, pass through Auburn regularly. RAIL The Union Pacific Railroad (UP) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (BNSF) have rail lines running through Auburn. The UP line runs north -south, to the east of the Interurban Trail. BNSF has a double-track, federally designated, high-speed railroad line running north-south. BNSF and Sound Transit added a third track to this north-south line in 2016. This third track was installed to handle increased commuter rail traffic and freight traffic. The BNSF Stampede Pass line runs east-west through downtown Auburn, entering Auburn at the east end of town near Auburn-Black Diamond Road, and merges with the north-south line just south of the Auburn Station. In addition, BNSF operates a rail yard between A Street SE and C Street SW, south of SR -18. In the future, this area may develop as a multi-modal rail yard, prompting the need to mitigate increased truck traffic through capacity improvements. BNSF also has plans to increase traffic on the Stampede Pass line, the east-west rail line running through Auburn. To accommodate this increase, the City completed the grade separation of M Street SE. Both the BNSF north- south line and the Stampede Pass line are handling an increase in rail freight traffic. BNSF handles a number of unit (solid) coal trains traveling to terminals in northwest Washington state, as well as unit oil trains carrying crude oil to northwest Washington state refineries. While loaded coal and oil trains are usually handled on the north -south line, some of these empty trains return east to Wyoming or North Dakota via the Stamp ede Pass line. The pavement at the crossing of the Union Pacific Railroad at 15th Street SW is in poor condition. Rehabilitation of the pavement is a high priority for the City, and a project has been programmed to reconstruct 15th Street SW from C Street SW to the railroad tracks. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 20 TRUCK The City has designated truck routes for through freight movement in an effort to maximize the efficiency of, and protect the roadway infrastructure. Current City of Auburn truck routes are shown in Map 2-3. Truck routes, established by City ordinance, are designated for roadways that incorporate special design considerations such as street grades, continuity, turning radii, street and lane widths, pavement strength, and overhead obstruction heights. In addition, the Washington State Freight and Goods Transportation System (FGTS) is used to classify roadways, freight railroads, and waterways according to the annual freight tonnage they carry as directed by RCW 47.05.021. Map 2-4 shows the 201913 classifications of City streets. The FGTS is primarily used to establish funding eligibility for Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) grants, fulfill federal reporting requirements, support transportation planning process, and plan for pavement needs and upgrades. The FGTS classifies roadways using the following categories:  T1: more than 10 million tons per year  T2: 4 million to 10 million tons per year  T3: 300,000 to 4 million tons per year  T4: 100,000 to 300,000 tons per year  T5: at least 20,000 tons in 60 days and less than 100,000 tons per year Truck freight tonnage values are derived from actual or estimated truck traffic counts and converted into average weights by truck type. The City expects that the majority of regional truck trips will take place on state highways. However, recognizing that trips through the City are sometimes necessary, Auburn has designated a network of north-south and east-west corridors as truck routes, which are built to truck standards. In addition, the City has designated future truck routes, which will be designed and constructed to accommodate truck traffic, as opportunities arise. FMSIB has expressed an interest in these first and last mile connectors which provide access between these classified freight facilities and port, rail yard, distribution centers and truck terminals. Auburn has significant industrial and commercial development throughout the City. The City encourages local delivery trucks to use the designated truck network as much as possible, but recognizes that trips on non-truck routes are necessary. The City is committed to supporting local industry, business, and residential needs and recognizes that the ability to ship and receive freight is essential to the success of many businesses. To implement this policy, the City will collaborate with local businesses to improve freight access, while maintaining the roadway infrastructure, whenever possible. This may include adopting City Code and updating the Auburn Engineering Design and Construction Standards in a manner that favors these priorities. However, in a limited number of key locations, trucks may be prohibited due to existing design elements which do not support trucks, protecting sensitive areas such as downtown and residential neighborhoods, and to extend pavement life. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 21 Truck Traffic Using S. 277th Street SAFETY The City places the highest priority on providing a safe transportation system for all travel modes. Continual efforts are made to make changes to the street system in a manner that improves safety and decreases the likelihood and severity of collisions. Pedestrian crossings and other non-motorized safety issues are discussed in the following chapters. At grade railroad crossings, emergency response needs and collisions related to the street system are discussed below. At grade railroad crossings create conflict points between vehicles and non-motorized road users and rail traffic. Auburn has several at grade railroad crossings: the Union Pacific tracks cross 44th St NW, 37th Street NW, 29th Street NW, West Main Street, and 15th Street SW . The BNSF tracks cross 37th Street NW, 29th Street NW, 3rd Street NW, W Main Street, and Auburn - Black Diamond Road. With as many as 75 trains passing through the City each day, the City has many at- grade crossings, each with unique safety implications. The City coordinates with railroad operators and the State to upgrade the crossings whenever possible. For instance, the project to grade separate M Street SE at the BNSF Stampede Pass tracks by lowering M Street SE under the railroad overpass was completed during 2013. Recent upgrades include the construction of a pre-signal where 37th Street NW crosses the BNSF tracks, to stop westbound vehicles on 37th Street NW to the west of the grade crossing in advance of the traffic signal at B Street NE. The pre-signal will prevent vehicles from stopping on the crossing. BNSF recently constructed a third rail mainline between Seattle and Auburn to improve service and reliability for passenger rail. The new mainline is located on the west-side of the existing tracks. The third mainline reduces vehicle storage for westbound vehicles on W Main Street and 3rd Street NW between the tracks and traffic signals with C Street NW 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 22 Impacts at the remaining grade crossings are anticipated to worsen in the future due to increased vehicle demands at the crossings, combined with increased rail traffic, resulting in more frequent, and longer duration, closures. EMERGENCY RESPONSE AND MANAGEMENT Providing residents with quick responses in emergency situations is a high priority for t he City. The City maintains a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan and supporting plans which identify critical facilities that should be maintained as a first priority during catastrophic events. Critical transportation facilities, generally include Principal Arterials, bridges and major evacuation routes. In addition, the City works to provide a street network that will ensure multiple alternate routes for emergency vehicles. Fire and police response vehicles are equipped with traffic signal controls that enable emergency vehicles to secure safe and rapid passage along signalized corridors. In addition, the City has mutual-aid agreements with nearby emergency response operators to ensure adequate coverage in case of road closures or other obstacles tha t would otherwise prevent timely emergency response. COLLISIONSCRASHES The City collects and reviews collision crash data to identify intersection and roadway locations where potential hazards exist. Potential safety problems are identified using the Safety Priority Index System (SPIS) methodology, an effective problem identification tool for evaluating locations with higher collision crash histories. The SPIS score for a location considers three years of data and considers frequency, collision crash rate, and severity. If a hazard is identified, corrective measures can then be identified and implemented as appropriate. While the City relies primarily on its own data, collision crash data from other sources, including neighboring jurisdictions and the State, is utilized whenever available. 2.2 STREET STANDARDS AND LEVELS-OF-SERVICE The Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to establish service levels for the street network and to provide a means for correcting deficiencies and meeting future ne eds. Transportation professionals use the term ‘level-of-service’ (LOS) to measure the operational performance of a transportation facility, such as a street corridor or intersection. This measure considers perception by motorists and passengers in terms of speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions and delays, comfort, and convenience. The City currently uses a single-mode LOS system based upon vehicular travel. In the future, a multi- modal system which includes transit, pedestrians, and bicyclists should be developed and adopted. The currently adopted LOS methodology gives letter designations from ‘A’ through ‘F’, with LOS A representing the best operating conditions, and LOS F representing the worst. LOS can be 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 23 quantified in different terms, depending on the transportation facility. Definitions for each level-of-service and the methodologies for calculating the level-of-service for various facilities are contained in the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000). The City most commonly uses corridor level-of- service for accessing facilities. Generally, this is considered the most comprehensive way to determine vehicular traffic impacts. The following descriptions provide some guidance for interpreting the meaning of each LOS letter for corridor LOS on city streets.  LOS A describes primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds, usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed (FFS) for the given street class. Vehicles are completely unimpeded in their ability to maneuver within the traffic stream. Control delay at signalized intersections is minimal. FFS is the average speed of vehicles on a given facility, measured under low-volume conditions, when drivers tend to drive at their desired speed and are not constrained by control delay. Control delay is the total elapse time from a vehicle joining the queue until its departure from the stopped position at the head of the queue. This includes the time required to decelerate into the queue and accelerate back to free-flow speed.  LOS B describes reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds, usually about 70 percent of the FFS for the street class. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is only slightly restricted, and control delays at signalized intersections are not significant.  LOS C describes stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than at LOS B, and longer queues, adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of about 50 percent of the FFS for the street class.  LOS D borders on the range in which small increases in the number of vehicles may cause substantial increases in delay and decreases in travel speed. LOS D may be due to poor progression through the signalized intersections along a corridor, inappropriate signal timing, high traffic volumes, or a combination of these factors. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of FFS.  LOS E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of 33 percent or less or the FFS. Such operations are caused by a combination of adverse signal progression, close signal spacing, high volumes, extensive delays at critical intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.  LOS F is characterized by urban street flow at extremely low speeds, typically one-third to one- fourth of the FFS. Intersection congestion is likely critical at signalized locations, with high delays, high volumes, and extensive queuing. CITY LOS STANDARDS AND CURRENT LOS It is necessary to define LOS standards for transportation facilities to enforce the concurrency requirements of the GMA. If development causes a facility to degrade below a defined LOS standard, concurrency requires that the development make improvement to restore operations to the LOS standard or better, or the permit for that development be denied. Additionally, if development degrades a facility that is already operating below LOS standards, concurrency 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 24 requires that the development make improvements to restore operations to the pre- development conditions. Auburn defines unsatisfactory LOS as: an unacceptable increase in hazard or unacceptable decrease in safety on a roadway; an accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements that can reasonably result in accelerated deterioration of the street pavement (typically addressed through the payment of the truck impact fee); an unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an intersection where two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector network; an increase in congestion which constitutes an unacceptable adverse environmental impact under the State Environmental Policy Act; or the inability of a facility to meet the adopted LOS standards. The City uses corridor LOS as its primary measurement to evaluate the City’s of transportation system and to identify needed improvements impacts. The City corridors typically used for analyzing LOS are shown in Map 2-5, although the City may require analysis of a different segment in order to assess the full LOS impacts. All arterials and collectors in Auburn have designated LOS standards. The LOS standard for these corridors is primarily LOS D with the exception of some corridors that may operate as LOS E or F. While the City uses a weekday PM peak hour based LOS system, weekday AM peak hour LOS impacts may be required to be analyzed in situations where unique conditions are likely to result in a LOS deficiency during the weekday AM peak hour. Table 2-1 identifies Auburn’s LOS Standards, as well as the 2014 corridor LOS. As indicated in the table, LOS was calculated for many of Auburn’s street corridors using traffic count data collected during 2014. When evaluating the impact of a proposed development, intersection and queuing LOS are analyzed and evaluated, in addition to these corridor LOS. Typically, a traffic impact analysis is submitted by the developer and evaluated by the City, to establish which mitigation is required, if any. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 25 Table 2-1 Corridor Level of Service – Existing 2014 Weekday PM Peak Hour ID Corridor From To LOS Standard* 2014 LOS NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St E C C 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE F C D 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr. SE D B C 5 M St/Harvey Auburn Way N E Main St E D D 6 M St/Harvey E Main St Auburn Way S E D C 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N E C C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** D D 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D B C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW E D D 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D B C 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B B 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th Pl SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D A C 26 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE E D C 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr. A St SE Auburn Way S D D C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S F F E 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE F F F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D E * Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. ** Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. As shown in the table, each of the corridor segments currently meets LOS standards adopted by the City as part of this plan. The LOS standards for several corridors have been revised downwards in recognition that a number of corridors are considered to be built out by the City due to Right-of-Way constraints, impact to existing development, and project costs. For example, eastbound Cross Street and both eastbound and westbound 41st Street SE, all of which currently operate at LOS F. The poor operations on these segments can be attributed to their short length, closely spaced signalized intersections, and limited storage lengths, combined with high volumes of turning traffic. In the majority of cases it is the traffic operations at the intersections along a corridor which limit the capacity of the corridor, rather than the capacity of the roadway segments between intersections. This is especially true along corridors with closely spaced intersections, such as Cross Street and 41st Street SE, and corridors where two principal arterial roads intersect, such as Auburn Way S and M Street SE. Along other corridors where the number of intersections is limited and the distances between them are greater, the corridor LOS may not identify a bottleneck at one or more of the intersections along the overall corridor. An example of this is along the Kersey Way corridor, where the overall corridor operates at LOS B, but the 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 26 intersection with 29th Street SE operates at LOS D, with the highest delays and longest vehicle queue associated with southbound traffic on Kersey Way. STATE HIGHWAY LOS Amendments to the GMA in 1998 added new requirements for local jurisdictions to address state- owned transportation facilities, as well as local transportation system needs in their comprehensive plans (RCW 47.06.140). House Bill 1487, adopted by the Washington State Legislature in 1998, requires that the transportation element of local comprehensive plans include the LOS standards for Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS). HB 1487 clarified that the concurrency requirement of the GMA does not apply to HSS or other transportation facilities and services of statewide significance. HB 1487 also requires local jurisdictions to estimate traffic impacts to state-owned facilities resulting from land use assumptions in the Comprehensive Plan. THE WSDOT STANDARD WSDOT has identified a LOS D standard for all urban Highways of Statewide Significance (HSS) according to the State Highway System Plan (HSP). All state highways within the City of Auburn, including SR-18, SR-167, and SR-164 are classified as urban Highways of Statewide Significance, and therefore have a LOS D standard. LAND USE/TRANSPORTATION RELATIONSHIP Land use and the transportation system are intertwined, each influencing the development of the other. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate how the future transportation system can be improved to best support both existing and proposed land-uses. In 2003 Auburn was designated as a Regional Growth Center by the Puget Sound Regional Council as part of the Vision 2040 plan. Designated regional growth centers are identified for housing and employment growth, as well as being eligible for regional transportation funding. A broad overview of Auburn’s Comprehensive Plan land use map’s more intensive land use designations shows industrial (light and heavy) designations in the west side of the valley floor portion of the City, extensive commercial development (light and heavy) located along Auburn Way N, Auburn Way S, and A Street SE, and sizable heavy commercial designated areas near the SR-18 and 15th Street SW interchange (The Outlet Collection) and between 15th Street NW and 37th Street NW (Emerald Downs). Downtown Auburn is near the geographic center of the City, located generally east of the Interurban Trail, north of SR-18, west of F Street SE/NE, and south of 3rd Street NW/NE and 4th Street NE. Residential development generally exists along the east side of the valley floor and the surrounding hillsides of West Hill, Lea Hill, and Lakeland Hills. A major land use activity in Lea Hill to the east includes the Green River College located on SE 320th Street. As with many cities in South King and North Pierce counties, especially those along the SR -167 corridor, the local land use plan is characterized by a predominance of industrial land use designations. The land use element identifies “Industrial” as the City’s second most 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 27 predominant zoning designation (residential being first). Consequently, the City’s land use plan establishes a development pattern that has traffic generated by these ind ustrial uses directed towards the State Highway System. Another key feature in the Comprehensive Plan land use element is a “Heavy Commercial” designation at 15th Street SW, adjacent to SR-167 and SR-18. This commercial designation is the site of The Outlet Collection. The Outlet Collection attracts customers on a regional basis and impacts use of the State Highway System, even more than the downtown, or the commercial development along Auburn Way and A Street SE. The same can also be said for Auburn Way N to the north of downtown which serves as an auto mall, which attracts both local and regional traffic. Downtown Auburn contains a mix of land-uses including residential, commercial and industrial uses. Commercial uses in the Downtown are focused along Main Street, Auburn Way and A Street SE, and tend to serve more local needs. Historically, this commercial development has served predominantly local needs. However, the presence of the Auburn Station, Multi Care, City Hall, and new development projects, combined with regulations and policies that encourage transit oriented developments, downtown commercial development will serve a broader range of needs in the future. Downtown Auburn also has the City’s most robust non - motorized infrastructure, including both extensive pedestrian and bicycle facilities. This provides the opportunity for both residents and employees to rely on proximate transit services at the Auburn Station, combined with a robust non- motorized transportation system for a portion of their transportation needs. The goal of this plan is to continue to grow and expand the non-motorized transportation system to provide the same transportation choices throughout the City. The City’s Comprehensive Plan land use map focuses residential development in the eastern portion of the valley and in the West Hill, Lea Hill, and the Lakeland Hills area. Access to the State Highway System in Lea Hill is limited to SR-18 at SE 304th Street. Future impacts on the State Highway System in the Lea Hill area will primarily be commuter traffic due to the predominance of residential comprehensive plan designations in that area, and continued growth of Green River College. The development of Lakeland Hills will also principally result in increased commuter traffic. Future impacts to the State Highway System can generally be gauged by projected arterial link ADT volumes at or near state highway ramps. This is, at best, only a general estimate since not all traffic passing through these street segments is utilizing the State Highway System. Further, traffic using the arterial segment may be originating from outside Auburn, and may therefore not result from assumptions in Auburn’s land use plan. Several city arterials connect directly to SR-167 and SR-18. Some examples include C Street SW, West Valley Highway, and Auburn Way South connections with SR-18, and 15th Street NW and 15th Street SW connections with SR-167. These streets are among the most heavily used in the City, a function of their relationship to the State High way System. SR-164 is also within the city limits. Year 20193 average daily traffic (ADT) volumes along SR-164 range from a low of 21,70019,000 near the eastern city boundary up to 35,90038,000 along Auburn Way South near SR-18. These volumes are forecast to continue to increase over the next 20 years. However, the 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 28 growth is limited by the capacity of the roadway. The State Highway System also impacts the City’s local street system. A “pass -through” traffic pattern results in significant traffic volume increases on the local arterial street system. For example, many of Auburn’s weekday PM peak hour trips are work to home trips originating outside of the Auburn area and destined for residential areas outside of Auburn, including Pierce County and the Enumclaw Plateau. This traffic exits state routes and travels through Auburn to avoid congestion on the State Highway System. This is evidenced by increases in traffic counts within the City that clearly exceed that which might be expected through anticipated growth and development patterns outlined in the City’s land use plan, such as at SR-164 at the eastern City limit. The City may implement measures that encourage local traffic movements and discourage pass-through trips. 2.3 FUTURE STREET SYSTEM METHODOLOGY FOR EVALUATING FUTURE SYSTEM TRAVEL FORECASTS HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT GROWTH Auburn has grown rapidly during the past decade, and housing and employment are expected to continue to increase significantly by 2035, with the population reaching approximately 95,000 residents, as shown in Figure 2-1. Much of the housing growth will come from higher density re- development in the downtown area and the rapidly growing Lakeland Hills and Lea Hill areas. Figure 2-1. Population, Housing, and Job Growth For City Of Auburn 2000 – 2035 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 29 TRAFFIC GROWTH The City of Auburn relies on traffic forecasts using the VISUM travel demand model, which is based upon the land use plan and assumptions found in the land use element of the Comprehensive Plan. Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) household and employment forecasts are also used. The model is calibrated to include existing land uses and local knowledge, including large traffic generators such as Boeing, the Outlet Collection, Emerald Downs, Muckleshoot Casino, and White River Amphitheater. Areas outside of the current city limits that are expected to significantly impact the City transportation system are included in the model. The model enables the City to conduct traffic forecasts for all arterial and collector streets based upon a number of if-then development and land use scenarios. The more dramatic traffic increases are often caused by development outside the City, especially along the roadways serving the Enumclaw Plateau. Other areas of major traffic increase include A Street SE, M Street SE, and the West Valley Highway. In order to address the growing traffic volumes and congestion levels on city streets, traffic operations were evaluated for a near term horizon year of 2022 and a long term horizon yea r of 2035. This approach was taken to help identify which improvement projects need to be included in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) to accommodate short term growth, vs. those longer term projects which are needed to accommodate additional growth forecast to occur between 2022 and 2035. FUTURE 2022 CONDITIONS City Projects The current 2015 TIP, adopted during 201519, identifiesd programmed projects for the years 2016 to 2021. Therefore, the analysis of 2022 traffic operations includes City projects thatwhich would increase capacity along both roadway segments and at intersections thatwhich are anticipated to be constructed by 2022. The included projects are listed in Table 2 -2 and illustrated on Map 2-6. This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is was not included in the travel demand model: a new crossing of the BNSF Rail yard between SR -18 and 41st Street SE (2015 TIP #12). This is discussed in more detail in the Future System Recommendations section of this chapter and may be included in future updates to this plan. The 2015 TIP also includeds non-capacity projects such as non-motorized and preservation projects. The City’s ADA transition plan also identifies non-motorized improvements. In addition, non-motorized improvement projects are discussed in Chapter 3, Non -Motorized Transportation. Regional Transportation Projects In addition to the City of Auburn projects identified above, a number of regional transportation projects are planned to be completed, predominantly WSDOT projects planned for the freeway 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 30 system. However, none of these projects are anticipated to be completed by 2022. Additional Projects In addition to the projects identified in Map 2-6, four intersections along the City boundaries outside of the City were identified as potential level-of-service concerns during the plan development. While the following intersections have not been analyzed in detail because they are partially situated outside of Auburn’s jurisdiction, they should be evaluated by the appropriate jurisdiction and programmed for improvements as needed:  51st Avenue S/S 316th Street (King County)  S 321st Street/46th Place (City of Auburn / King County)  S 321st Street/Peasley Canyon Road (King County)  West Valley Hwy/Peasley Canyon Rd (WSDOT) As mitigation for an adjacent development project located within the City of Auburn, the eastbound stop-controlled S 316th Street approach to 51st Ave S was widened to provide separate left and right-turn lanes. This improvement was required to mitigate a development related impact to LOS at this intersection. The same development project also identified a traffic operations impact at the S. 321st Street intersection with 46th Place S. As a mitigation for this impact, the development dedicated ROW to the city to allow the 46th Place S. approach to S. 321th Street to be realigned to the east to create two offset “T” intersections. This project is included in the current TIP, and included in Table 2-2 below. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 31 Table 2-2 Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimate – 2022 Projects shaded green = completed Map No. Location Total Cost (2015 dollars) (corridor and segment) Description City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis Auburn Way S U-Turns, pedestrian improvements, and access control 1 Dogwood St SE to Fir St SE $1.75M I Street NE Corridor 2 45th St NE to S 277th St Construct 5 lane arterial $6.75M S 277th Street Widen to 5 lanes total and install a Class 1 trail 3 AWN to Green River Bridge $8.3M 4 A Street NW Phase 2 Construct multi-lane arterial $3.15M W. Main St to 3rd St NW F Street SE Pedestrian, Bicycle and Vehicular Access Improvements 5 4th St SE to Auburn Way S $2.5M M Street NE 6 E Main St to 4th St NE Widen to 4 lanes $1.5M 8th Street NE Add EB lane to south side of 8th Street NE 7 Pike St NE to R St NE $1.45M 49th Street NE Construct multi-lane arterial connection 8 Auburn Way N to I St NE $3.35M 46th Place S Realignment Realign 46th Place S to the east to create two new T intersections 9 S 321st St and 46th Pl S $825K 124th Ave SE Corridor 10 SE 318th St to SE 312th St Widen to 4 lanes and bike lanes $4M SE 320th Street 11 116th Ave SE to 122nd Ave SE Roundabout, Bike lanes, and safety improvements $4.64M 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 32 City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis (Continued) Auburn Way S Additional turn lanes and vehicle storage, access control, and non- motorized improvements. 12 Muckleshoot Plaza to Dogwood St SE $2.9M W Valley Highway Improvements Roadway widening, re- channelization, non-motorized improvements and ITS upgrades 13 15th St NW to W Main St $3.7M W Main Street Re-channelization, non-motorized improvements, ITS upgrades 14 W Valley Hwy to Interurban Trail $4.45M 15 Auburn Way S Widen to 5-lanes, signalize Hemlock St SE $4.6M Fir St SE to Hemlock St SE 16 M Street SE Corridor Construct multi-lane corridor $6.7M 8th St SE to Auburn Way S. 17 Lea Hill Road Segment 1 Widen to 2 lanes each direction including widening of the Green River Bridge. Includes bike lanes and sidewalks. $13M R St NE to 105th Pl SE Widen corridor to include 2 eastbound lanes, bike lanes and sidewalks. 18 Lea Hill Road Segment 2 $12M 105th Pl SE to 112th Ave SE Widen corridor to include 2 eastbound lanes, bike lanes and sidewalks. 19 Lea Hill Road Segment 3 $4M 112th Ave SE to 124th Ave SE 20 W Valley Highway Re-channelization, non-motorized improvements, ITS upgrades $3M SR 18 to 15th St SW 21 R Street SE Construct a new roadway connection $10M 17th St SE to M St SE 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 33 City Projects Included in the 2022 Analysis (Continued) 22 M Street SE at 12th Street SE Install a new traffic signal $625K 23 M Street SE at 29th Street SE Install a new traffic signal $450K 24 124th Avenue SE at SE 284th Street Safety and capacity improvements $700K Lake Tapps Parkway 25 Lakeland Hills Way to E Valley Hwy Add ITS system $1M 26 29th Street SE at R street SE Increase intersection capacity $1.8M 27 A Street SE at 37th Street SE Install a traffic signal and southbound u- turn for future access management $935K 28 I Street NE at 22nd Street NE Construct a new roundabout $1.4M Subtotal for City Projects $109M Non-City Projects included in the 2022 Analysis 51st Avenue S 288th Street Add signal 2022 LEVELS OF SERVICE Weekday PM peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2022 conditions using the same methodology used to calculate the 2014 levels of service shown previously. The same corridors were analyzed in both cases. The 2022 levels of service account for the growth forecast to occur between 2014 and 2022 and the capacity improvement projects identified above. The 2022 levels of service are shown in Table 2-3. Is should be noted that without the projects shown in Table 2-2, the traffic operations presented in Table 2-3 would be significantly worse, with a number of corridors operating below adopted LOS standards. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 34 Table 2-3 Corridor LOS – Future 2022 Weekday PM Peak Hour ID Corridor From To LOS Standard* 2022 LOS EB/NB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St E C D 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE F C E 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr. SE D C C 5 M St/Harvey Rd Auburn Way N E Main St E D D 6 M St/Harvey Rd E Main St Auburn Way S E D D 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N E C C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** D D 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D C C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D C D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW E D D 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D B D 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E C C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B C 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C B 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th Pl SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D B B 26 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE E D D 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr. A St SE Auburn Way S D C C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S F E E 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE F F F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E D C * Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. ** Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. As shown in the table, all of the evaluated corridors would meet the revised LOS standards in 2022 with the inclusion of the improvements identified above. However, the following segments are forecast to operate at LOS F in 2022:  Southbound Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE;  Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW; and  Westbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SW. In order to improve traffic operations along these corridor segments additional improvements beyond those already included in this analysis are required. A review of the segment of Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE shows that traffic operations through the SR -18 interchange and at the intersection with M St SE cause the overall corridor segment to degrade to LOS E. The interchange area is constrained by the existing SR-18 overpass, the configuration of the SR-18 on- and off-ramps, and the close spacing of the ramp intersections which provide limited vehicle storage. As a result the ability to increase capacity along this section of the corridor is limited. It is possible that the construction of the new eastbound off-ramp from SR- 18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot Casino could draw traffic away from this area; however the scope of this project has not yet been determined so it was not accounted for in this analysis. It may also be appropriate, as with certain other corridor sections, for the City to 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 35 consider changing the LOS standard for this corridor to reflect that the existing corridor is built - out and further improvements are neither desirable nor cost effective. Similar circumstances exist for Corridor #33, 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road. This corridor is forecast to operate at LOS F in both the eastbound and westbound directions in 2022. This corridor is constrained by the BNSF bridge, the close spacing of the C Street SW and A Street SE signalized intersections, and the limited storage space between the two intersections. Providing additional capacity would likely require the BNSF bridge to be reconstructed, an expensive proposition, with a limited increase in capacity. It is possible that other capacity projects may reduce traffic volumes on this by constructing additional capacity on alternate routes. These include the crossing of the BNSF rail yard to the north which would provide another east-west connection across southern Auburn, and the completion of the improvements to Stewart Road to the south, including the replacement of the White River bridge, which would provide additional capacity between SR-167 and the Lakeland Hills area. The BNSF rail yard crossing project is included was project #12 in the 2015 TIP, however construction wasis shown beyond 2021, so this project was not included in the analysis of 2022 conditions. As of 2020, this project was removed from the TIP and included in the comprehensive plan project list in Appendix A, as funding for this project has not been identified. Completion of the Stewart Road capacity improvements are being planned by the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. The City of Auburn supports these improvements, and has programmed athe project in the 2015 TIP as project #73, which will provide the City of Pacific with some funds to support construction of their portion of the project. As of 2020, the City has programmed two projects in the current TIP, one to provide funding to the City of Pacific, and one to provide funding to the City of Sumner for the Steward Road capacity improvements. Construction of these improvements is not anticipated until beyond 2022, so this was not accounted for in this analysis. Another potential option could be to revise the LOS standard for this corridor to reflect that the existing corridor is built-out and further improvements may not be cost effective. The transportation system can be compared to a three legged stool in terms of the improvement strategies which are available to reduce congestion. The three options are to construct improvements to add capacity, make better use of the existing infrastructure which is available, and to manage demand. The analysis presented above accounts for the construction of additional capacity, and making better use of the available capacity through expansion of ITS infrastructure and the optimization of signal timing. The analysis does not account for demand management strategies which could result in improvements to traffic operations through the use of the following:  Road Pricing  Parking Management and Parking Pricing  Car Sharing  Pay-as-You-Drive Insurance  Ridesharing and HOV Lanes  Transit Incentives  Transit and non-motorized Improvements  Telework, compressed work week, off-peak schedule 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 36 Many of these solutions have been implemented at the state level, with additional consideration being given to expanding the options which ar e currently in use. Decisions need to be made regarding how these three potential congestion management tools are balanced to provide the most cost effective solutions. It is unlikely that the City will be able to implement all of the capacity projects documented above by 2022 due to the cost of the project portfolio being in excess of available funding. Therefore, the focus should be on the most cost effective projects which reduce congestion at locations where it is a recurrent problem, and improving the efficiency of the existing system. Transportation system management and transportation demand management are included in the future system recommendations section at the end of this chapter. FUTURE 2035 CONDITIONS City Projects In addition to the projects identified above which were included in the 2022 analysis, a number of additional projects were included in the analysis of 2035 conditions. These additional projects include those which are included in the TIP but which are not anticipated to be constructed until beyond 2022, and the longer term projects included in the previous Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The included projects are listed in Table 2 -4 and illustrated on Map 2-6. This includes a project programmed in the TIP that is not included in the model: the crossing of the BNSF Rail yard. This is discussed in more detail in the Future System Recommendations section of this chapter and will likely be included in future model runs and updates to this plan. Regional Transportation Projects In addition to the City of Auburn projects identified above, a number of regional transportation projects were included in the development of the forecast volumes. These are predominantly WSDOT projects planned for the freeway system. Table 2 -4 summarizes the included projects, along with planning level cost estimates. Additional Projects Another future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addition of the Auburn Bypass connecting SR-18 to SR-164. A draft Bypass Feasibility Report (September 2009) was prepared in partnership with WSDOT, the City of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional partners. While a preferred alternative for the bypass has not yet been developed, the Washington State Legislature included funding in the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of this new connection. It is anticipated that the new roadway will include an eastbound off-ramp from SR-18 to SR-164 in the vicinity of the Muckleshoot Casino, no additional details regarding the project have been determined. Therefore, this was not accounted for in the traffic forecasts. The impacts of this project will be identified and mitigated as part of the process to determine the ultimate alignment. The project will be included in future updates of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 37 Table 2-4 Future Capacity Projects and Cost Estimates - 2035 Map No. Location Total Cost (2015 dollars) (corridor and segment) Description Additional City Projects Included in the 2035 Analysis Widen road to two lanes each direction plus a center two-way left turn lane. Upgrade the intersection of Auburn Way South and Dogwood Street to accommodate Bypass traffic. 29 SR 164* $61M Hemlock St SE to Academy Dr SE R Street Bypass 30 M St SE to SR-SR 18 Construct a new bypass road $6.2M SE 304th Street Add signal and NB left turn lane. Include sidewalks and bike lanes both sides. 31 112th Avenue SE $1.3M 124th Ave SE & SE 320th St Intersection Improvements Construct intersection improvements at the entrance to Green River College. 32 SE 318th St to SE 320th St $1.85M Add one-way (EB) road with unsignalized free right turn at A Street SE. Include sidewalks both sides of new road. 33 A Street Loop $1.7M A St SW to A St SE Construct new collector linking 284th Street at 124th Ave. to 288th Street at 132nd Ave. Road will be one lane each direction with bike lanes and sidewalks. SE 284th/SE 288th St 34 124th Ave SE to 132nd Ave SE $7.7M Provide protected SB left turn phase and signal and SB left turn lane; Include bike lanes and sidewalks on all legs 51st Avenue 35 S 296th S $1.4M 36 D Street NW Construct 4 lane arterial $6M 37th Street NW to 44th Street NW Subtotal for Projects $87M 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 38 *A portion of this project is under design in 2020, from Hemlo ck St SE to Poplar St SE, which includes road widening, center turn lane, and sidewalks on each side. This project in included in the current TIP and the City is actively seeking funding for the construction. Non-City Projects included in the 2035 Analysis SR-167 I-405 to SR-509 From I-405 to SR-18, add one NB and one SB general purpose lane; From SR- 18 to SR-161, add one NB HOT lane and one SB HOT lane; Add direct NB/SB HOV/HOT lane connection ramps between SR-167 & I-405; Add NB and SB auxiliary lanes between I-405 and S 180th Street; Add NB and SB auxiliary lanes between SR-516 and S 277th Street; Extend SR-167 from SR-161 to SR- 509. SR-18 at SR-167 Complete ramp from EB SR-18 to SB SR-167 and eliminate SR-18 access from West Valley Highway near Peasley Canyon. SR-167 15th Street NW to 8th Street E Add HOV lane each direction Stewart Road SR-167 to East Valley Highway Widen to 2 lanes each direction and center turn lane in the Cities of Sumner and Pacific. Includes widening of the White River bridge. 2035 LEVELS OF SERVICE Weekday PM peak hour levels of service were calculated for 2035 conditions using the same methodology used to calculate both the 2014 and 2022 levels of service. The 2035 levels of service account for the growth forecast to occur by 2035 and the capacity improvement projects identified above. The 2035 levels of service are shown in Table 2-5. As shown in the table, all of the evaluated corridors would meet the revised LOS standards in 2035 with the inclusion of the improvements identified above. However, the following additional corridor segments would operate at LOS E or F in 2035:  Southbound Auburn Way N between S 277th St and 15th St NE;  Southbound Auburn Way S between E Main St and M St SE;  Northbound M St between E Main St and Auburn Way S;  Eastbound 37th St between W Valley Hwy and Auburn W ay N;  Westbound 15th St SW between W Valley Hwy and C St SW;  Southbound Lakeland Hill Way SE between Lake Tapps Pkwy and A St SE;  Eastbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S;  Westbound 3rd St SW/Cross St between C St and Auburn Way S; and  Westbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE. In addition, there are two locations where corridors would operate at improvement levels of 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 39 service in 2035 relative to 2022 conditions:  Eastbound 41st Street SE between A St SE and C St SE, which would improve from LOS F to LOS E, the result of the improvements identified above, combined with the planned improvements to the Stewart Road corridor and SR-167 which would attract traffic currently using the 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road corridor to access A Street/East Valley Highway to the south.  Southbound West Valley Highway between 15th Street NW and 15th Street SW, which would improve from LOS D to LOS C. This is also likely to improvements to SR -167, which would reduce the use of West Valley Highway as a parallel bypass route. Table 2-5. Corridor Levels of Service - Future 2035 Weekday PM Peak Hour ID Corridor From To LOS Standard* 2035 LOS NB/EB SB/WB 1 Auburn Way N 15th St NE S 277th St E D E 2 Auburn Way N E Main St 15th St NE E D D 3 Auburn Way S E Main St M St SE F C F 4 Auburn Way S M St SE Academy Dr. SE D D C 5 M St/Harvey Rd Auburn Way N E Main St E D E 6 M St E Main St Auburn Way S E E D 8 37th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N E E C 9 15th St NE/NW West Valley Hwy Auburn Way N F** E E 10 Auburn Ave/A St 6th St SE E Valley Access Rd D C C 11 Main St West Valley Hwy R St D D D 12 15th St SW West Valley Hwy C St SW E D E 13 C St SW Ellingson Rd SR-18 D C D 14 West Valley Hwy 37th St NE 15th St NE E B C 15 S 277th St Frontage Rd L St NE E E C 16 R St SE/Kersey Way Howard Rd Lake Tapps Pkwy D B C 17 Lake Tapps Pkwy East Valley Hwy Kersey Way SE D C C 18 A St NW/B St NW 3rd St NW S 277th St D C C 19 8th St NE/Lea Hill Rd Harvey Rd 124th Ave SE E C B 22 SE 312th St/132nd Ave SE 124th Ave SE SR-18 D B B 25 105th Pl SE/SE 320th St Lea Hill Rd 124th Ave SE D C C 26 Lakeland Hills Way SE Lake Tapps Pkwy A St SE E D E 27 29th St SE/Riverwalk Dr. A St SE Auburn Way S D C C 31 3rd St SW/Cross St C St Auburn Way S F F F 33 41st St SE/Ellingson Rd A St SE C St SE F E F 35 West Valley Hwy 15th St NW 15th St SW E C C * Corridor segments within Downtown Auburn may operate at LOS E in accordance with the Auburn Downtown Plan. All other arterial and collector corridors must operate at LOS D or better, unless otherwise indicated. ** Total travel time in the eastbound direction cannot exceed 1,000 seconds for this corridor to meet LOS standards. To improve traffic operations along the corridor segments which are forecast to operate at LOS E and F in 2035, additional improvements beyond those already included in this analysis are required. However, it may not be cost effective to construct the additional capacity needed along all of these corridor segments. It may, however, be possible to improve traffic operations at key intersections along these corridors to reduce congestions. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 40 The City, and the broader region, will need to identify strategies and adopt policies, including transportation demand management, transportation system management, and public-private partnerships, to be able to manage congestion while reaching projected growth targets. FUTURE SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS West Main Street, Downtown Auburn FUTURE STREET IMPROVEMENTS The proposed future street plan consists of a combination of city street and regional transportation improvements, described in Table 2 -2 and shown in Map 2-6. The City cannot adequately solve traffic congestion by making City street improvements alone. Partnerships with WSDOT, King and Pierce Counties, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other agencies are essential to implementing the future street system in Auburn. The following actions are proposed: 1. Implement street projects prioritized in the City’s TIP and CFP; 2. Program and seek additional funding for street capacity projects not currently identified in the TIP and CFP; 3. Work collaboratively with WSDOT and other partner agencies to implement roadway improvements to the regional highway network; and 4. Work to implement TSM, TDM and non-motorized improvements. 41ST STREET SE/ELLINGSON ROAD BETWEEN A ST SE AND C ST SW The area around 41st Street SE/Ellingson Road between A Street SE and C Street SW continues to be a bottleneck for Auburn drivers, especially with additional development in the Lakeland Hills PUD and the Pierce County cities to the south. The close spacing of these two intersections, coupled with the numerous business and residential accesses in the area warrant a more in depth study of the area. This area is included within the scope of the A Street SE 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 41 Corridor Study being completed in 2020. The purpose of the study is to identify potential safety, capacity, and operational improvements along the corridor, including intersection control, and access management. This study will likely also include the entire A Street SE and C Street SW corridors, and an evaluation of the BNSF rail yard crossing projects discussed below. BNSF RAIL YARD CROSSING The City has identified the need for a new east/west grade separated crossing of the BNSF rail yard between C Street SW and A Street NE. There are a variety of criteria that the City will consider to determine the alignment of the crossing, including potential development of the BNSF property as a multi-modal rail yard, commercial development on Auburn Way S and A Street SE, re-development of the GSA property, funding feasibility, neighborhood impacts, transportation impacts, and engineering feasibility. The crossing project was not accounted for in the 2035 traffic model. Therefore, it is difficult to access the specific impacts of the crossing project. However, it is anticipated that the project could significantly improve east-west mobility in southern Auburn, relieving the existing bottlenecks at 3rd Street SE and 41st Street SE, by providing an additional alternative for the residential neighborhoods to the east of the rail yard to connect with the commercial and retail land-uses and SR-167 to the west of the yard. One potential impact of the crossing projec t, depending on the alignment selected, could be an increase in traffic through the Terminal Park neighborhood. AUBURN BYPASS Another future project with significant area-wide impacts is the addition of the Auburn Bypass connecting SR-18 to SR-164. A draft Bypass Feasibility Report (September 2009) was prepared in partnership with WSDOT, the City of Auburn, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional partners. The Washington State Legislature included funding in the 2015 transportation budget for the design and construction of this new connection. The project is currently referred to as the East Auburn Access project and is being lead by the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe. The 2015 legislation defined the project as providing an east bound off -ramp from SR-18 that would connect to SR-164. The currently defined purpose of the project is to develop an affordable, long-term solution that:  Improves congestion, reduces corridor travel time, decreases queuing that blocks driveways and intersections, and improves reliability for emergency response for SR-164  Accommodates current and future land use in the urban growth areas of King County, Auburn, Enumclaw, and the Muckleshoot Indian Reservation. This project has not yet been accounted for in the City’s traffic models and forecasts as the project has not yet established the preferred alternative. The project will be included in 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 42 future updates of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT Transportation system management (TSM) techniques, which make more efficient use of the existing transportation facilities, can reduce the need for costly system capacity expansion projects. These techniques can also be used to improve LOS when travel corridors reach adopted LOS standards. TSM techniques used by the City include:  Re-channelization/restriping, adding turn lanes, adding /increasing number of through lanes;  Signal interconnect and optimization;  Turn movement restrictions;  Access Management; and  Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). The City will continue to use these TSM techniques to maximize the efficiency of the existing street network. Of the various TSM strategies available, the City continues to invest in and expand its ITS infrastructure as a cost effective means of increasing system capacity. The ITS system enables the City to change traffic signals in real-time, thereby accommodating unexpected increases in traffic or traffic obstacles such as event related traffic and collisions. For example, ITS has proven to be a useful tool in helping to manage the impact of event traffic traveling south on Auburn Way South, often during the PM peak, to the White River Amphitheatre. The City will continue to roll out ITS capabilities on corridors around the City, as referenced in Map 2-7 and detailed in the ITS policies included in Chapter 5. In addition to TSM strategies, the City strives to provide viable alternatives for travelers, to ensure freedom of choice among several transportation modes, including transit, biking and walking as alternatives to the automobile. The City will prioritize the development of pedestrian-friendly environments such as bicycle routes and pedestrian paths as the non- motorized system expands. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Reducing congestion includes strategies to reduce demands on the transportation system. The State of Washington emphasized the importance of transportation demand manag ement (TDM) by adopting a Commute Trip Reduction law. That law requires all major employers, with over 100 employees arriving between the hours of 6:00 and 9:00 AM, to develop programs and strategies to reduce the number of commuter automobile trips made by their employees. Transportation demand management reduces demand on the street system. While TDM and TSM employ a different suite of strategies, they share many of the same benefits. Both increase the efficiency of the transportation system, reduce the need for costly capacity expansions, help improve LOS, and contribute to an enhanced quality of life for those who use and benefit from the transportation system. TDM strategies include: 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 43  ride-sharing through vanpools and carpools;  preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles;  car sharing programs;  transit use incentives;  parking management to discourage single occupant vehicle (SOV) travel;  telecommuting;  alternative work schedules to compress the work week or shift the commute outside the typical commute hours; and  urban design encouraging non-motorized travel through design features. The City of Auburn will continue to encourage drivers of single occupancy vehicles to consider alternate modes of travel such as carpools, vanpools, transit, non -motorized travel, and alternative work schedules, and has identified mode split goals for the Regional Growth Center. The goals were developed in consideration of the current mode splits for the Auburn Regional Growth Center, the current mode splits for all of the designated Regional Growth Centers, and the 2040 mode split targets identified by PSRC for all of the designated Regional Growth Centers. The existing and 2035 mode split goals for the Auburn Regional Growth Center are summarized in Table 2-6. Table 2.6 Regional Center Mode Split Goals Mode 2010 Existing 2035 SOV 81% 56% HOV 8% 8% Transit 6% 27% Bike 2% 4% Walk 3% 5% The mode split goals for the Regional Growth Center reflect the desire to significantly reduce automobile travel as a share of work trips, with the most significant increase in the share of trips by transit. The reduction in the vehicle mode split will be the result of the right mix of land-use changes, transportation investments, and roadway pricing tools. Additionally, factors such as shifting demographic trends, preferences, and technology may contribute to mod e shifts above and beyond the identified goals. STREET MAINTENANCE & REHABILITATION The City is responsible for maintaining the physical structure of the roadway system. However, pavement maintenance is expensive, and adequate funding is generally not available. An annual report is published annually to document the pavement rating throughout the City. Recognizing this dilemma, Auburn residents approved Proposition 1, the “Save Our Streets” (SOS) Program, in November 2004. The SOS program created a dedicated local street fund for repair, rehabilitation, and maintenance of local roadways from property tax revenues. In 2013, after the original programs tax increases ended, the City Council modified the funding source 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 44 for this program to be from sales tax on construction. In 2004, the citizens of Auburn voted to establish a funding program for local streets called the Save Our Streets (SOS) program. The original SOS funding measure allowed the City’s property tax levy to generate revenue solely used to fund the preservation and re-construction of local streets. At the end of 2012, the practice of funding the SOS Program from property taxes ended. In 2013, the city council allocated the sales tax from construction projects within the City to be dedicated to the SOS Program. Since 2013, funding for the local streets preservation program has averaged about $2.3 million due to the significant amount of construction activity within the City during this period. For 2019 and 2020, the funding approach was once again modified to fund the local streets preservation program with real estate excise tax, or REET, in place of the sales tax from construction. Unfortunately, REET funds are a limited source of revenue and funding of the local street preservation program at $1.65 Million per year is not sustainable from this source. The City has created a similar program to fund the repair and maintenance of arterials and collector streets. The program is funded through a one percent utility tax. While the available funding through this program is limited, which makes prioritizing projects challenging, the City has been able to maximize the value of the available funds by using them to leverage grant funds, enabling significantly more arterial and collector street repair and maintenance to be completed. Local Residential Street Before SOS Rebuild Local Residential Street After SOS Rebuild NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS Transportation systems and facilities can impact adjacent neighborhoods. Potential impacts result from increased traffic resulting from drivers seeking alternate routes t o congested arterials, in an effort to save time. These impacts can include higher vehicle speeds resulting in potential safety concerns, and associated air and noise pollution. Neighborhoods throughout 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 45 the City are concerned with these traffic impacts and want to discourage cut-through traffic. City policies discourage through traffic in neighborhoods. The City also has a traffic calming program that addresses the pedestrian, bicycle, and automobile traffic safety concerns that impact neighborhoods. The traffic calming program is a community-based program with the goal of identifying potential problems and development of solutions to help mitigate these impacts. The program raises public awareness of traffic safety issues and ways that people can help minimize traffic problems in their own neighborhoods. As part of its adopted Traffic Calming Program, the City conducteds approximately 50 multi -day radar studies of streets in local neighborhoods annually. These studies helped target increased Police enforcement efforts, and may resulted in signage changes such as permanent “Your Speed Is” radar feedback signs. In other locations where they are were recommended by the traffic engineer, physical traffic calming such as speed cushions were installed. The Traffic Calming program is currently on hold due to the limited resources ava ilable, and is being revaluated. At this time it is unknown when and how it will be re -established. Transportation staff work closely with the Police to address speeding concerns received from residents. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION The Growth Management Act (RCW 36.70A.070) provides that comprehensive plans should include a discussion of intergovernmental coordination efforts, including “an assessment of the impacts of the transportation plan and land use assumptions on the transportation systems of adjacent jurisdictions.” Auburn works closely with neighboring cities, the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and state and regional agencies to ensure coordinated efforts are made in develop ing all modes of the transportation system. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 46 CHAPTER 3 - NON-MOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION Riding on the Interurban Trail Non-motorized transportation is an integral component of Auburn’s transportation system. Non-motorized travel includes walking and bicycling. The City seeks to enhance the non- motorized travel environment both for recreational travel and trips that might otherwise be taken via a car or bus in order to improve mobility and environmental health. The City recognizes that the evolution of the transportation system has prioritized the automobile as the primary travel mode. A side effect of this process has been the erosion of conditions favorable to non-motorized travel. This chapter seeks to redress the balance by enhancing conditions in which non-motorized modes are a realistic and attractive travel option. Planning and developing a strong non-motorized network supports several state and national acts including Washington’s Growth Management Act, Commute Trip Reduction Act, the federal Clean Air Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), MAP 21 (Federal Surface Transportation Bill) and its successors. Supporting the non-motorized system helps ensure compliance with these initiatives and the healthy community princi ples espoused by PSRC through Vision 2040. It also increases funding opportunities for City projects. Improving the non-motorized system also helps address the findings of the citywide Health Impact Assessment process, which recommended that the City impro ve sidewalk connectivity, improve the pedestrian environment, eliminate natural and man -made mobility barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists, improve transit access, improve traffic safety, pedestrian safety and personal security. This chapter is divided into two subsections: pedestrian travel and bicycle travel. Each subsection contains an assessment of existing conditions and needs, followed by guidelines for 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 47 development of the future system. 3.1 PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL Pedestrian Crossing at Green River College on S. 320th Street As a Regional Growth Center, the City encourages transportation planning that emerges from a clear land-use plan based on a community vision and the values expressed in Imagine Auburn. In this vision, Auburn supports higher density housing in the downtown; neighborhood commercial districts; and landscaped, pedestrian-oriented street and sidewalk design. This pattern of development reinforces a positive pedestrian environment. NEEDS ASSESSMENT Auburn has many assets, which contribute to a welcoming pedestrian environment, most notably a pedestrian-scaled downtown and an extensive network of trails. The needs assessment highlights these existing assets and identifies improvement needs. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT As a whole, Auburn’s urban fabric in the downtown has remained intact and supports a positive pedestrian environment. Businesses, shops, and single-family homes front streets with sidewalks and street trees. However, some of the older sections of sidewalks need re pair or replacement. Since adoption of the 2009 Transportation Plan, there have been sidewalk, ADA and lighting improvements to Main Street, S Division Street Promenade, City Hall Plaza and Plaza Park and 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 48 behind the shops on East Main Street. New growth in the downtown core has or will result in the development of multi - story residential and office buildings and senior housing, helping renew the pedestrian infrastructure and creating a need for continued effort to maintain and improve the sidewalk system. In addition, the Sounder commuter rail station and transit hub at West Main Street and C Street SW provide pedestrians more options for connecting to regional destinations. These improvements contribute to a more hospitable environment for pedestrians. The city has an annual sidewalk repair program which focuses on ADA improvements, responding to complaints, repairing identified hazards, and improving areas with high pedestrian use. Commercial development outside the downtown exists primarily along arterials and is dominated by strip development and auto-oriented businesses. Although sidewalks are provided on most arterials, pedestrians may feel exposed to the traffic. Surface parking lots border the sidewalks, and driveways interrupt the continuity of the sidewalk system. The heavy volumes of vehicular traffic and wide streets along arterials, such as Auburn Way, pose a barrier for pedestrians walking along or crossing the roadway. Sidewalk Inventory A detailed sidewalk inventory is planned when resources are available, to meet the requirements of the ADA and identify the areas where improvements are needed. The City’s GIS base map shows the approximate locations of sidewalks throughout the City. Most of this information was generated The currentA sidewalk inventory was conducted as part of the Plan update in 2005 usingbased on aerial photography and other GIS data. The base map was updated in 2008 to show sidewalks on A subsequent inventory was conducted in 2008 to collect sidewalk data for the West Hill and Lea Hill where a large scale annexation into the City took place in 2007. The GIS basemapinventory is continuously updated based on updated aerial photography and as-built plans asGIS data as improvements are completed. The City is currently developing a plan to create a comprehensive sidewalk inventory that would support the City’s ADA Transition Plan, help identify needed improvements, and assist in overall asset management and maintenance of the City’s sidewalk infrastructure. The inventory identifies sidewalks locations in the City, and rated their condition. This inventory continues to serve as a guide to help the City identify problem areas and program improvements according to prioritization guidelines, outlined later in this chapter. The older residential neighborhoods tend to have sidewalks on both sides of the street, but they vary widely in condition and construction standards. Some residential areas, such as southwest Lea Hill, were built under King County’s jurisdiction and sidewalk construction was not required. Breaks in the sidewalk network require pedestrians to maneuver around parked cars, into private yards, or into the street. In newer neighborhoods such as Lakeland Hills, sidewalks built to the city standards applicable at the time of their construction are provided on both sides of the street. The sidewalk survey of the Lea Hill and West Hill annexation areas revealed a sporadic and often disconnected sidewalk system. Several of the newer residential developments have 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 49 sidewalks, but many of the older residential areas and arterial streets are missing large segments of sidewalk, resulting in an inconsistent pedestrian environment.. Map 3-1 illustrates the existing and proposed sidewalk network within the City. Trail Network Auburn’s developing trail network provides local and regional connections for both recreational use and commuting. The regional trails that have been developed include the Interurban Trail and portions of the Green River and White River Trails. The Lakeland Hills Trail network provides connections to neighborhood parks, community center, and to the City of Sumner via a tunnel under the BNSF railway. Map 3-2 illustrates the existing and proposed trail network within the City. SCHOOL ACCESSIBILITY School safety is a major concern for parents, students, the school districts, and the City alike. The Auburn School District, working with an advisory committee, has established a safe walking area for each elementary and middle school based on the presence of sidewalks, walking paths, and safe neighborhood streets, as well as the availability of safe street crossings and the traffic conditions in the surrounding neighborhoods. All routes within the safe walking areas are designated as ‘Safe Routes to School’. Occasionally, individual schools will notify parents and students of preferred walking routes within each area. Since the last major update of the comprehensive plan the following Safe Walking Routes improvements have been made throughout Auburn; Some of these improvements were made possible by a Safe Routes to School grant. The flashing beacons have been funded through a combination of grant programs and City resources. Despite the progress that has been made over the past several years, there are still areas of need. The following needs were identified to enhance and improve the safety for school children in and around the school safe walking areas. The City will continue to work with the School District to identify gaps in the walking boundaries around each schools. Lakeland Hills Elementary Encouraging increased walking and biking to this school would provide the greatest benefit for easing traffic congestion and safety concerns. Additionally an onsite parking and access redesign would further reduce school pick up and drop off related congestion. Chinook Elementary Sidewalks along Auburn Way South between Hemlock St SE and Academy Dr SE. Additionally intersection improvements have been identified to reduce conflicts and improve circulation for buses. Accessible Routes of Travel 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 50 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that all new public, commercial, and institutional developments meet ADA standards. Furthermore, existing public buildings, public outdoor facilities, and public rights-of-way shall be retrofitted to achieve accessibility. An accessible route of travel is designated to accommodate the needs of many different people, including those who are blind, using wheelchairs, pushing a stroller or cart, or injured. The law requires that municipalities have a transition plan in place to address ADA issues. The City of Auburn is in the process of completing that planadopted completed an ADA Transition Plan for facilities in the Public Right-of-Way in 2020, with associated new policies that is published on the City’s website. The City’s Engineering Design and Construction standards are also published on the City’s website and include, and ADA design and construction specifications that support ADA compliance. can be found in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards manual. Site Design Pedestrian conditions should be evaluated at the earliest stage of new development. The zone between the development and the public right -of-way needs to contribute to pedestrian network connectivity and continuity. In addition to the public right-of-way, the interior of the site ought to be examined for suitable pedestrian circulation, and how the two are connected. Wherever possible, walkways should be placed along the most direct routes to connect buildings, parking, bus stops, and other attractions. In some cases, walking trails that link residential streets to collectors or arterials can provide a more direct pedestrian connection than travel along the sidewalk network, particularly in neighborhoods without a street grid system, specifically those with cul-de-sacs. FUTURE SYSTEM This section describes the City’s vision for the future pedestrian system, and identifies programs and initiatives that will enable it to achieve this vision. Downtown The downtown is historically the social heart of the community, a place for people to interact. It is considered one of the primary pedestrian-oriented areas in the City. Important existing pedestrian downtown linkages include connections from W Main Street to the transit hub and commuter rail station, and between W Main Street and the Multicare Auburn Medical Center. The Downtown Plan, a special area plan adopted in 2001 as part of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, anticipates high pedestrian oriented developments in this area, particularly around the Auburn Station. The Downtown Plan also identifies W Main Street, A Street SW, Division Street, and the alley south of Main Street as high priority pedestrian corridors. In addition, several recently completed projects have helped improve non-motorized access to the downtown and transit station, including the City Hall Plaza and Plaza Park project completed in 2010, the Division Street Promenade Project completed in 2012 and the A Street NW Extension project, opened in June 2013. Auburn Station has created demand for new mixed-use development, including commercial and residential elements. The City is committed to focusing new commercial and residential development adjacent to the Auburn Station and has been working on partnerships to bring several mixed-use developments to Downtown. These developments include pedestrian friendly design and streetscape improvements. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 51 A vital pedestrian network that extends beyond downtown is a key element in the revitalization of the downtown core. Commercial Corridors The City encourages major employers to locate near transit routes and stops. Furthermore, pedestrian connections from residential areas to commercial corridors can be enhanced through site design policies that encourage more direct non-motorized connections to major retail locations. Future planning along commercial corridors should also include amenities such as landscaping adjacent to the sidewalk, improved pedestrian crossings, and enhanced bus stops at high use locations. Auburn has several commercial corridors, most notably Auburn Way North and South, that are frequently traveled by pedestrians. While most of these areas have sidewalks, there is the opportunity to enhance the pedestrian environment by providing additional protected crossings, making improvements to lighting, completing remaining sidewalk gaps and eliminating ADA accessibility barriers. For instance, pedestrian crossing issues arise because pedestrians often cross at uncontrolled or mid-block locations rather than walking to the nearest signalized crossing. This dynamic is partially attributable to the location of bus stops in relation to employment centers. Hence, efforts should be made to locate bus stops so commuters crossing to the opposite side of the road are dropped off and picked up near a signalized intersection. Residential Neighborhoods Investment in Auburn’s neighborhoods is an essential component of providing a comprehensive and functional pedestrian network. As noted in the needs assessment, sidewalk conditions vary throughout the City. This plan acknowledges the need to retrofit the pedestrian network in many areas of the City and incorporate pedestrian facilities into new development. Financial mechanisms to help accomplish this goal are described later in this chapter. High Priority Pedestrian Corridors and Locations Map 3-1 identifies High Priority Pedestrian Corridors and locations such as schools, parks, and the Downtown Urban Center where providing pedestrian facilities is vital to safety, mobility, economic development, and accessibility in the City. The map distinguishes between corridor segments with complete existing pedestrian facilities and corridor segments that are not yet complete ( that are currently lacking a complete sidewalk system. Some of the corridors have sidewalks on one side or both sidesfor portions of the corridor). Others are missing sidewalks altogether. While some corridors need sidewalk on both sides of the roadway, some will meet the needs of pedestrians with sidewalk on one side only. The map identifies where sidewalk exists and where sidewalk is needed. The map does not distinguish where sidewalks meet the City’s current standards, and where the City expects to have sidewalk on both sides in the future. These High Priority Pedestrian Corridors were selected based on the following criteria: pedestrian volumes; proximity to schools, parks, transit routes, downtown center, and commercial areas, and connections between pedestrian facilities to provide a network throughout the city; and where missing gaps can be completed. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 52 The High Priority Pedestrian Corridors are roadway corridors where the City intends to target investment in pedestrian facilities. The City’s current half street policy requires sidewalk to be constructed by developers whenever significant improvements are made to a property. This has proven to be an effective means of building out the sidewalk network. However, it is a slow process because it relies on new development or redevelopment to occur, making it difficult to complete whole corridors. By programming specific pedestrian corridors for investment, the City can leverage grant dollars and other resources to more strategically complete gaps in key pedestrian corridors. The High Priority Pedestrian Corridors identified in Map 3-1 are regularly reviewed for inclusion in the City’s Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program and for grant funding opportunities. NON-MOTORIZED TRAILS Auburn Multi-Use Trail The Auburn Parks, Recreation & Open Space Plan was updated in 2015 and identifies specific projects for the development of local and regional trails. The long term list includes: The Auburn-Pacific Trail provides a multi-use path that improves access from the White River to the Interurban Trail. A planned pedestrian crossing, under the BNSF railroad tracks just north of the BNSF Stuck River Bridge (over the White River), will improve the regional trail system by providing a connection between the City of Pacific and Auburn’s White River Trail connection to A Street SE. Funding is still needed for the Auburn section of the Green River Trail. King County, which is the lead agency for this trail, published a new alignment study for the Green River Trail in December 2019. Planning efforts are also focused on the Auburn Environmental Park and connecting the park to the Interurban Trail. This uniqu e park project shows residents the diversity of the ecosystem along the Mill Creek corridor. Additional trail planning is underway for connecting the Fenster Natural Park to the Green Valley Road area. An important component of Auburn’s trail system includes trailheads. Trailheads should be 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 53 inviting to users and provide amenities such as parking, bicycle racks, information kiosks, restroom facilities, water fountains, trash receptacles, and seating facilities. Trailheads should be constructed and improved as Auburn’s trail system further develops. See Map 3-2 for existing and proposed trails and trailhead locations. FUNDING MECHANISMS Sidewalk Improvement Program The City of Auburn has an Annual Citywide Sidewalk Repair and Improvement Program to repair damaged sidewalks, tripping hazards, and to complete small missing links in the sidewalk network. These funds are essential for promoting non-motorized travel and can be used to leverage other funding sources, such as state and federal grants or other city capital projects. Auburn has identified three principal areas in which sidewalk improvements should be prioritized: corridors that provide access to and within the downtown, school zones, and parks with a focus on addressing potential hazards and areas of known complaints. Additional criteria for priority access improvement could include, but are not limited to, areas with high concentrations of senior citizens or disabled citizens, areas with high volumes of pedestrian-transit interaction, areas where private improvements such as trees have damaged the public infrastructure, and areas where property owners are willing to financially participate in the construction of sidewalk improvements through a local improvement district (LID). In considering projects, staff also review existing street deferral agreements to determine if the improvements previously allowed to be deferred are now needed and should be completed by the private party. “Save Our Streets” Program In November 2004, Auburn residents approved Proposition 1, “Save Our Street” Program, which created a dedicated local street fund. This money was set aside for repair and maintenance of local roadways which can sometimes also include sidewalk repair and rebuild. In 2013, the city council modified the funding source for this program to be from Construction Sales Tax revenues and no longer from property taxes. In 2018, City Council modified the funds for this program, which are currently provided by Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) for 2019 and 2020. Sidewalks will be prioritized:  Where hazardous conditions are present;  On school walk routes;  Where extensive improvements are needed in a single neighborhood;  Along streets with curb and gutter;  Along Downtown pedestrian corridors;  Where curb ramps are missing; and  Where they will complete a missing link in a pedestrian network.  Where property owners are willing to financially participate in the construction of sidewalk improvements through an LID. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 54 “Arterial Preservation” Program The City also currently implements the annual arterial street preservation program funded by a 1% utility tax. Pedestrian, ADA, and safety improvements are included in many of the arterial improvement projects funded by this program. Arterial Bicycle and Safety Improvement Program The City implements this bi-annual program to fund bicycle and pedestrian improvements on classified roadways. Local Improvement Districts Local Improvement Districts (LID) enable city investment in a specified area by leveraging city funds with contributions from property owners in the district. LID’s use limited city resources to improve neighborhood quality and can be used to finance new sidewalks. Safety Education and Enforcement Awareness of pedestrian safety issues should be promoted through educational programs and enforcement efforts. This combination helps reinforce key safety issues such as safe pedestrian crossings and speeding. The City will proactively work to identify problem areas and issues. The following list contains examples of some techniques that can be employed in these efforts.  Maintaining non-motorized travel information kiosks at key City destinations (e.g. Main Street, Outlet Collection, Emerald Downs, trails).  Displaying educational information in City publications, on the website, and on TV.  Maintaining and expanding wayfinding signage to direct pedestrians and bicyclists.  Partnering with the School District to teach children safe walking and biking behaviors.  Launching public information campaigns for problematic locations and partnering with the Police Department to provide enforcement.  Increasing driver awareness of vehicle speeds through the presence of radar speed signs where appropriate. Enforcing pedestrian, bicyclist, and driver infractions. 3.2 BICYCLE TRAVEL Bicycle facilities are an important component of Auburn’s transportation and recreational infrastructure. Bicycling provides an environmentally friendly travel mode and helps citizens to maintain a healthy lifestyle. It also helps improve traffic congestion and air quality by providing an alternative to driving. Increasingly, bicycle commuting is becoming a more popular alternative, and the City is taking steps to provide a more functional and attractive network for commute cyclists, in addition to recreational cyclists. NEEDS ASSESSMENT Existing Conditions 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 55 The topography in the Auburn Valley is flat and conducive to cycling for a range of skill levels. Areas along the Green and White Rivers provide recreational opportunities for multi-use trails that accommodate bicyclists and pedestrians. The Interurban Trail is part of a major north- south regional trail system. The Green River trail is also an extension of a north-south regional trail. Therefore, Auburn has a good network of existing or planned north-south recreational trails. However, there are few existing cross-town connections, and new connections onto the West Hill and Lea Hill are needed. Cross-town bike connections to the West Hill and Lea Hill areas of Auburn are more challenging due to steep topography. Yet investing in these connections is important because a significant number of Auburn residents live in these areas. Building these connections would improve bicycle access to regional transit, local employment, the regional trail system, and to downtown Auburn. Recreational and commuter cyclists travel along the Interurban Trail to areas north and south of Auburn. Cyclists also frequently ride along S 277th Street to the east side of Green River Road, and down along the Green River to 8th Street NE, or down R Street NE to SE Auburn Black Diamond Road. SE Auburn Black Diamond Road and SE Green Valley Road are popular routes for accessing areas east of Auburn. However, these roads are characterized by challenging cycling conditions and are not suitable for inexperienced cyclists. Once in Auburn, there is especially a need to increase the number of east-west bicycle facilities. Investing in trail connections to improve bicycle access in these areas should also be a priority. Bicycle lanes are limited on city arterials and collectors, making it difficult both for regional and local riders to navigate for any reasonable distance through the City. Limited bicycle storage is also a hindrance to cyclists. Map 3-2 identifies existing and planned trails and bike facilities in the City. Auburn Bicycle Task Force In March 2010, the city formed the City of Auburn Bicycle Task Force. This task force dissolved upon completion of their goals. It was intended that the Bicycle Task Force would further refine the City’s goals and policies for its bicycle transportation system. The Task Force was comprised of a broad cross section of community members and interested parties that were charged to develop recommendations on bicycle facilities, issues and opportunities centered on the following three principles:  Connections – for example, how do bicycle riders get from the north end to the south end of the City or from Lakeland to Lea Hill?  Recreation Opportunities – for example, how does the City further build and capitalize on a bicycle network to support and enhance the recreation options for its citizens?  Economic Development – for example, how does the City capitalize on the Interurban Trail as a conduit of customers for existing and new businesses? Bike Improvements Completed and Planned in the Near - Term Future 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 56 The work of the task force has informed and guided city decisions on future bike lane and trail improvements and connections. Its work is directly reflected in improvements already made as well as the future bike lanes and trail improvements shown in Map 3-2. Since 2009 bike lanes were added to 124th Ave SE, and SE 320th Street near Green River College on Lea Hill, a new bike lane connection was created by the construction of the new A Street NW corridor. Bikes lanes were added as part of the new M Street SE BNSF underpass project and sharrows (share the road with bike symbols) were added to East Main Street. Bike lanes are part of the new planned West Main Street project and the F Street SE project includes development of a Bicycle Boulevard and Bike Share Program. Bicycle Facility Classification The American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) has developed classifications for bicycle facilities and parking. Bicycle classification is based on the design and exclusivity of use. Bicycle Facility Classification  Separate Facility (Class I) – A non- motorized two-way paved facility, that is physically separated from motorized vehicular traffic by an open space or barrier.  Bike Lane (Class II) – An exclusive on street one way lane for bicyclists delineated with signing and striping  Shared Lanes (Class III) – A lane shared by vehicles and bicycles. Wider lanes that may be delineated with shared use markings and signage.  Bicycle Boulevard– A bicycle focused roadway designated with enhanced signage and special pavement markings and bicycle friendly design standards such as wide curb lanes and bicycle safe drain grates. Typically designed to connect key bicycle destinations. Existing Class I multi-use trails in the City include S 277th St from Interurban Trail to L St NE, Interurban Trail, White River Trail, and Green River Trails. Class II bicycle lanes added since 2009 include;  Terrace Drive NW (15th to W St)  A ST NW/B ST NW (3rd to 30th)  14th St NW (A NW to A NE)  R St SE (17th to White River)  M St SE (3rd to 8th)  116th Ave SE (SE 304th to SE 312th)  SE 312th St, 132nd Ave SE, SE Class III shared facilities were tested on R St NE/SE, Auburn Black Diamond Road and E Main St. They were well received by the cycling community and continue to be maintained. Shared facilities will 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 57 continue to be implemented on other appropriate roadways. The F Street Bike Boulevard is scheduled to bewas completed in 2020. Bike parking facilities are classified by length of use: long term, and short term. The longer bikes are to be stored, the more durable the facility’s design must be. Long term bike storage facilities are available at Auburn Station. The City currently provides short term bike storage throughout the downtown core. Improvement Needs Cyclists desire safe routes that make connections throughout the City and to regional points of interests. The existing facilities, while being continuously improved, still fall short of creating a well- connected bicycle network in Auburn. The City plans to build out the bicycle network shown in Map 3-2 and provide better east-west connections. Upgrading bicycle facilities on city streets is an important component of this plan. Auburn shall make greater efforts in the future to encourage bicycle use, particularly for commuting purposes, as a form of transportation demand management (TDM). One mechanism of doing so is to ensure that bike lanes and trails that serve major employers are prioritized. The City needs to take a more aggressive role in programming implementation of the future bicycle network identified in this chapter, ensuring that eventually all residents of and employees in Auburn feel comfortable commuting on bike. In addition, Auburn should seek outlets, including the City’s website, to provide up-to-date information on bicycling options within the City and to regional destinations. The Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) program provides a formal mechanism for encouraging these practices, and is required by state law for employers with 100 or more employees arriving at a single location during the AM peak travel time. Auburn’s CTR program calls out bicycle storage facilities, lockers, changing areas, and showers as measures employers can take to meet their CTR goals. In addition, Auburn can use the SEPA process to encourage development of these facilities at the time of new development or tenant improvements. The Downtown Plan also discusses the need for improving bicycle facilities in the area. On-street bicycle facilities will be sought in association with planned roadway improvements. In addition, the City should investigate providing bicycle storage and other amenities on City owned properties. FUTURE TRAVEL 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 58 The work is easier when shared The future bicycle network includes corridors for regional, recreational, and cross-town connections. The regional corridors will provide connections to the Valley communities as well other areas of King and Pierce Counties. Local biking groups have identified the Interurban Trail and Green River Trail as important regional connections. Other planned regional connections will link Auburn to attractions around the Puget Sound. The Green and White River corridors are multi-functional, providing recreational opportunities for regional and local bicycle trips. Therefore, the City has prioritized the completion of both these trail systems. Also, Auburn will seek to enhance portions of City trail systems whenever possible, by providing amenities for non-motorized travelers such as rest areas, as well as safety improvements including warning signage and grade separated trails. As shown in Map 3-2, the bicycle routes identified for future development will consist of a mix of interconnected local trails and on- street bike facilities linking Auburn's neighborhoods. The future Bonneville Power Trail will be a separated, hard surfaced trail crossing the Lea Hill area and connecting to the Interurban Trail and West Hill via on-street bicycle facilities. This new bike route is planned from Lea Hill through Isaac Evans and Dykstra Park to connect to downtown Auburn via the new A Street NW corridor. Numerous other on-street bicycle facilities and trails are planned. The selection of bike facility projects will be based upon safety, route continuity, and connectivity. In addition to new bicycle corridors, spot safety improvements are an important component of the City’s future bicycle network. Improvements including flashing beacons have already been made at the Interurban Trail crossing of 15th Street SW, and are planned at the Interurban Trail crossing of West Main Street and C Street SW and Ellingson. In addition, safe access to downtown Auburn and onto West Hill, Lea Hill and Lakeland are a priority for the City. Typical bicycle route improvements along a Class I facility include purchasing the right-of-way, designing the trail, and constructing the trail and trailhead. For a Class II pathway, improvements include striping lanes, installing warning and directional signage, and painting bike symbols on the pavement. For a 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 59 roadway where bikes will share the lane with vehicles, it may include the installation of shared use markings and signage. As this plan is updated in the future, emphasis should continue to be placed on developing a safe and convenient bicycling environment for both recreational and commuter cyclists of all experience levels. 3.3 FUTURE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM Auburn’s future non-motorized system consists of an interconnected network of sidewalks, bike lanes, and multi-use trails. The list of proposed projects in Table 3-2 is developed for planning purposes. Map 3-2 identifies the location of the trail projects identified in Table 3-2 and maps the future trail and bicycle network. Trail Name Description Potential Users Green River Trail This paved trail will be part of a regional recreational corridor. King County is the lead administrator of the project but will work in collaboration with the City for the portion of the trail in Auburn. The trail alignment will extend along the west bank of the Green River from S. 277th St., south to Brannan Park. From Brannan Park, the trail will then run south along M Street SE to 22nd Street NE, where it will turn east towards Dykstra Park. It will then cross the river at the Dykstra foot bridge to the east bank of the river. It will then parallel Green River Road and 104th Ave SE. Once across Lea Hill Road SE the trail will follow 104th PL. SE to the dead end. From the dead end the trail will follow the wooded bluff until it reaches a point opposite of Fenster Nature Park. At the alignment of 2nd St. SE the trail will cross at a future bridge location to the west side of the river and into Fenster Nature Park. The trail will continue south through the park and into the King County owned Auburn Narrows area where it will end near the intersection of Auburn Black Diamond Rd. and Green Valley Road. Bicyclists Pedestrians Auburn Environment al Park Loop This looped recreational path spurs off the Interurban Trail and will go through the Auburn Environmental Park. Off-road Cyclists Pedestrians White River Trail The White River Trail runs along the south side of the White River from Roegner Park to the eastern edge of Game Farm Wilderness Park. Future extensions of the trail are planned from A Street SE to Roegner Park, across the White River via the future BNSF Railroad underpass, on the south side of the river within the City of Pacific, and from Game Farm Wilderness Park to southeast Auburn along the White River. Bicyclists Off-road Cyclists Pedestrians Williams Trail These recreational trails are intended to use public or quasi-public lands, including utility corridors. A variety of loop trails may be possible within this large area. Bicyclists Off-road Cyclists Pedestrians Bonneville Power Trail This east-west trail will extend from Lea Hill to Dykstra Park Street, where it will connect to downtown Auburn and West Hill via an existing and planned series of bike lanes. There are topographical and environmental challenges that will need to be addressed during the design phase. Bicyclists Pedestrians Academy Trail The portion of Academy Drive from SR 164 to Green Valley Road is currently closed due to slope failures. However, it has the potential to be re-opened as a multi-use recreational trail. Bicyclists Pedestrians 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 60 Lakeland Hills Trail This trail serves the Lakeland community and links Sunset Park and Dorothy Bothell Park via a meandering sidewalk path along Lakeland Hills Way SE. Pedestrians A Street SE Trail This mixed use trail would be along the BNSF tracks to the west of A St SE, from 6th St SE to 41st St SE / Ellingson Rd. Bicyclists Pedestrians This network will provide local and regional connections for a variety of non-motorized modes. The completed portions of the Interurban and Green River Trails connect pedestrians and cyclists to areas north and south of Auburn, while the White River Trail provides for east-west travel. Additional bike lanes and completion of the paved trail network will guide cyclists safely to points of interests, and through congested areas of the City. Pedestrians will be able to travel more safely and comfortably with upgrades and expansion of the sidewalk network, new crossings and street lighting, and better street design near schools and frequently traveled pedestrian locations. The addition of a BNSF undercrossing, just north of the White River and west of A Street SE, will provide safe passage for pedestrians. A new trail connection along C Street SW will provide pedestrians and cyclists with a safer connection to downtown and the Auburn Station. PROMOTING HEALTHY COMMUNITIES White River Trail – Multi-Use Path The City of Auburn envisions a transportation system that will help promote healthy community principles by coordinating land use, the non-motorized transportation system, and transit in a manner that encourages walking and bicycling. The Puget Sound Regional Council has identified several elements, which contribute to the desirability of walking, bicycling, and transit use, in their Vision 2040 “Update Paper on Health”. Concentrating complementary uses such as restaurants, retail and grocery stores proximate to residences and employment. Linking neighborhoods by connecting streets, sidewalks, and trails. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 61 Designing for safe and welcoming pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Enhancing transit opportunities and non-motorized connections to transit facilities. Reducing and mitigating the effects of parking. These principles, many of which can be promoted by thoughtful transportation systems planning, encourage healthier communities by increasing physical activity and decreasing air pollution caused by vehicle emissions. Auburn has historically planned for a transportation system that incorporates many healthy community principles, such as transit facility planning and regional trail planning. In addition, the Downtown Plan calls for a mixed-use, high density, pedestrian oriented downtown. Improving the non-motorized system also helps address the findings of the citywide Health Impact Assessment process, which recommended that the City improve sidewalk connectivity, improve the pedestrian environment, eliminate natural and man-made mobility barriers for pedestrian and bicyclists, improve transit access, improve traffic safety, pedestrian safety, and personal security. In the future, Auburn shall continue to promote these principles through long-range planning efforts, capital facility improvements, development review, and community activities involving active lifestyle elements. IMPLEMENTATION TOOLS The City developed policies and identified funding strategies that will help implement the future non- motorized network. They can be found in Chapters 5 and 6, consecutively, of this plan. The planning direction outlined in this chapter shall be used as the foundation for implementing the non-motorized policies and securing funding. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 62 CHAPTER 4 – TRANSIT Auburn Station Transit service is a key component of Auburn’s transportation system, providing mobility within the City and access to and from the City. Unlike the street and non-motorized systems, Auburn does not directly administer transit service. Rather, the City works with local transit agencies to coordinate service in Auburn. The transit agencies are publicly funded and are responsible for providing transit service within their service boundaries. Today, Auburn is served by local and regional bus, as well as a commuter rail line that runs between Seattle and Tacoma/Lakewood. 4.1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT EXISTING TRANSIT SERVICES The following section provides a brief summary of the public transportation services offered in Auburn. Existing transit service for the Auburn area is identified in Map 4-1 at the end of this section. Due to the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, all transit agencies saw a reduction in ridership and implemented service reductions, which may continue into 2021. The service levels outlined in this section are for normal operation. KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT Bus Service 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 63 Metro Transit provides local bus services linking destinations within the community and providing regional connections to the Auburn Station and the 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride. With the deletion of Routes 910 and 952 and Route 160 alignment on Auburn Way, Metro will no longer serve the 15th Street NW Park and Ride in September 2020. However, the lot will continue to be served by ST Route 566. Metro Transit offers a network of bus service in Auburn, connecting the city to the region. Metro adopted and implemented changes to its network in September 2020, via the Renton-Kent-Auburn Area Mobility Plan (RKAAMP), and some of the routes were affected. These changes were in part to accommodate the planned RapidRide I Line, which would replace a portion of route 180, and provide frequent, reliable, and extended (early mornings to late night) service from Auburn Station, along the Auburn Way N corridor, connecting Auburn, Kent, and Renton transit stations. the following services in Auburn: Route 160 replaces the portion of former route 180 from Auburn Station to Kent, with minor changes in its alignment. This route provides 15 minute service during peak hours, and 30 minute service during off-peak, and operates from 4 am to 3 am on week days, and from 5 am to 3 am on weekends. This route will become the RapidRide I Line in 2023, and will provide service every 10 to 15 minutes. Route 165 replaces route 164 and 4 provides regional service between Kent, Auburn and the Green River College. It connects with the Route 181 at Green River College. This route is not changed within the city limits. Route 180 provides service daily between southeast Auburn, Auburn Station, and Kent Station, connecting to Route 150, with service to Seattle. Route 180 also serves SeaTac Airport and the Burien Transit Center. Route 181 provides daily service between the Twin Lakes Park-and-Ride, Sea-Tac Mall, Federal Way Transit Center, the Outlet Collection, Auburn Station, and Green River College. Route 184 replaces the portion of route 180 from Auburn Station to south Auburn, and provides 20 to 30 minute service during the day, and 30-60 minute service during nights and weekend, and operates from 5 am to 1 am on weekdays, and 5:30 am to midnight on weekends. Route 186 was combined in 2020 with Route 915 to have one route number only. provides weekday peak hour service between the Auburn Station and Enumclaw via Auburn Way South. The service is scheduled to meet Sounder Commuter Rail trains at the Auburn Station. Route 910 is a DART route which was inaugurated in October 2010 in a partnership between uburn and King County Metro Transit, and functions as a community shuttle circulator service. The route provides weekday and Saturday service between north central Auburn, the I street NE corridor, downtown Auburn, and the Outlet Collection / YMCA on 15th Street SW. was discontinued in 2020. Route 915 absorbed route 186, and provides weekday and midday service and some weekend service between the Auburn Station and Enumclaw via Auburn Way South. The route also includes a small portion of Demand Area Responsive Transit (DART) service with limited, variable routing in response to rider requests. Route 917 provides weekday and Saturday service between A Street SE, 41st Street SE, Algona, the Outlet Collection, and the Auburn Station. Peak hour weekday service is also provided between the 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 64 Auburn Station and the Social Security Administration and the General Services Administration (GSA). The route offers DART service (limited variable route) in portions of Pacific. As of September 2020, service is more frequent at 30 to 40 minutes on weekdays, and Sunday service is added, with 60 minute service on weekends. The route was shortened to begin in Pacific and will to no longer serve the A Street/ 41st St SE area of Auburn. The peak-hour deviation to serve the Social Security Administration and the General Services administration, which are in the process of relocation, was deleted due to low ridership and an off-peak deviation to directly serve the Wal-Mart was added to maintain access lost with the deletion of Route 910. Route 952 was discontinued in 2020. Route 952 is a weekday AM and PM peak hour route specifically designed to serve the Boeing Everett facility. It operates from the 15th Street NW Park and Ride to the Seaway Transit Facility near the Boeing Everett Plant. ACCESS ACCESS Transportation is a King County Metro paratransit service, providing door-to-door, shared- ride van transportation within most of King County. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires curb- to-curb paratransit service for persons whose disabilities prevent use of accessible non-commuter, fixed route bus service. This service is intended to offer a comparable level of service to that provided by regular bus service. Vanpool Services Metro Transit sponsors vanpool services that serve residents and employees in Auburn. Vanpool is a shared-ride service that provides group transport for commuters with proximate origins and destinations. Vanpool is a popular and flexible service that provides commuters with an alternative to driving alone and fixed-route transit service. Vanpool will continue to be an important strategy for mitigating peak period congestion throughout Auburn and the region. Metro Transit Facilities Metro Transit owns and operates the Auburn 15th Street NW Park-and-Ride with 244 surface parking stalls. Metro also operates into the Auburn Station managed by Sound Transit. Additionally, Metro maintains approximately 177 bus stops in Auburn, 42 of which contain passenger shelters. Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Under state law, the City is required to administer a Commute Trip Reduction program for all employers in Auburn with at least 100 employees arriving during the peak morning commute hours. The City of Auburn contracts with Metro Transit to provide CTR support services for the CTR affected local employers. Currently, there are 10 CTR employers in Auburn with a total of 5,500 employees. Metro Transit assists employers in complying with state law by providing rideshare support and a host of other incentives aimed at reducing single occupant vehicle travel. PIERCE TRANSIT 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 65 Route 497 is operated by Pierce Transit in partnership with the City of Auburn, and King County Metro Transit. It operates peak hour weekday service between Lakeland Hills and the Auburn Station. As a morning and evening service meeting Sounder trains, the 497 is a commuter - oriented route, but is open to all riders. In the future, the City hopes to expand the Route 497 to serve all peak hour Sounder trips. Because Route 497 primarily serves Sounder passengers, and because it significantly reduces the demand for commuter parking at the Auburn Station parking garage managed by Sound Transit, the city is seeking financial participation from Sound Transit in operating this route and making this a permanent route. Vanpool Services are provided by Pierce Transit similar to those offered by King County Metro Transit. Future RapidRide I Line: The new route 160 will become the RapidRide I Line in September 2023; the first to serve the City of Auburn. City staff collaborate with Metro on this project, to offer support, review, information, and help. King County Metro is applying for a grant to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Auburn supplied a support letter for the project and grant application. When the new service begins, Auburn will be served with frequent (10 to 15 minutes) and reliable service, connecting Auburn to Kent and Renton nearly 24 hours a day. SOUND TRANSIT Sound Transit is the regional transit provider for Puget Sound. It provides limited stop, transit services linking Auburn to major regional destinations in King and Pierce Counties. The agency offers Sounder commuter rail and regional express bus services in Auburn. Sounder Commuter Rail Sound Transit operates the Sounder commuter rail service on the Lakewood-Tacoma – Seattle route via the BNSF Railway. Sound Transit provides weekday peak hour trips northbound to Seattle in the morning and southbound from Seattle to Tacoma -Lakewood in the afternoon. Reverse direction trips are also provided in each peak hour with limited mid-day service. Some connections are available between south line Sounder trains, which terminate in Seattle, and north line Sounder trains from Everett to Seattle. Additional special event service to and from Seattle for Mariners, Seahawks, Storm, and Sounders games on some weekends. Currently, nine trains operate northbound to Seattle in the morning peak, with an additional train during the mid-morning, and ten trains return southbound during the PM peak. Three trains operate southbound to Tacoma/Lakewood in the morning and northbound to Seattle in the early evening. Regional Express Bus Service Route 566/567 offers daily weekday, limited stop service between the Auburn Station the Kent Station, the Renton Transit Center, the Bellevue Transit Center, and the Overlake Transit Center. Route 577/578 offers daily limited stop service between Puyallup, Sumner, Auburn, Federal Way and Seattle. The 577 provides service between the Federal Way Transit Center and Seattle during the peak periods when the Sounder trains is in operation. The 578 provides service between Puyallup and Seattle during the off-peak hours when train service is not currently provided. Transit Facilities 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 66 Sound Transit owns and operates the Auburn Station located in downtown Auburn. This full service multi-modal facility provides parking for a total of 633 vehicles in a 6-story parking garage and a surface parking lot. A new parking garage is expected to be available for transit users in September 2023, offering an additional 525 parking stalls. A number of parking stalls are reserved for carpool/vanpool, and a number of stalls are reserved for paying single occupant vehicles. The facility currently handles approximately 470 daily bus trips. Approximately 3,000 passengers ride bus service to/from the station on a daily basis. Boardings at Auburn on Sounder commuter rail are approximately 1,300 per day. The facility draws numerous transit riders from outside Auburn including from outside the Sound Transit taxing District, the geographic area where residents contribute tax revenue to fund Sound Transit. MIT TRANSIT The Muckleshoot Tribe runs two publicly available Transit routes along State Road 164. The Reservation Route runs through the Tribe community, and stops southeast of Les Gove Park. It runs every 30 minutes starting at 7:00am. The Auburn Route Express runs from the Tribe through the City of Auburn, making stops along the way. It runs every hour starting at 7:00am. 4.2 TRANSIT USER NEEDS DEMOGRAPHICS People use public transportation for two reasons: because they have to ride or because they choose to ride. Carrying the choice rider, such as commuters, often has the greatest positive impact on the transportation system by helping control peak hour traffic demand. But providing a “safety net” of adequate transportation to those who absolutely depend on it is, arguably, public transportation’s most important role. There are a number of ways to identify “transit dependency”, but the most effective way is to identify locations with high concentrations of residents who have no vehicle available in their household. An examination of the most recent year 2000 Census data available from the Bureau of the Census shows that some areas of Auburn have a high number of households with no vehicle available. This remains the most recent information available with the level of detail necessary to identify needs on a block level. As a comparison baseline, 9 percent of Auburn households have no vehicle available; this percentage is consistent with that of King County (9 percent) and slightly higher than that of Pierce County (8 percent). For the purpose of this analysis, block groups with significant concentrations of residential development in which over 12 percent of households have no vehicle available are considered transit dependent areas. There are eleven census block groups in Auburn in which over 12 percent of households have no vehicle available, nine of which have significant concentrations of residential development and are therefore identified as transit dependent areas. It is also notable that four of the nine block groups with large concentrations of residential development have at least 20 percent of households with no vehicle available. The nine block groups comprising the transit dependent areas had a total of 3,698 households in 2000, 771 (21 percent) of which had no vehicle available. Map 4-2 shows the transit dependent areas 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 67 and overlays the existing transit service in order to identify if adequate transit service is available to these highly transit dependent neighborhoods. Comparing the neighborhoods in question to the transit route structure, it is apparent that the vast majority of Auburn’s most transit dependent population lives within ¼ miles of a fixed route bus – the distance standard most often identified by the transit industry as a reasonable walking distance to transit. An exception to that rule is the area near Dogwood Street SE north of Auburn Way South where many of the transit dependent residents are located more than ¼ mile from fixed route bus service. In the future, it will be critical to ensure these areas continue to be well served by transit service, both in terms of route and schedule coverage. SERVICE COVERAGE Generally speaking, local transit service coverage in Auburn is well planned and well operated. Even though, there are some areas of the community that do not have adequate local service coverage, as well as some important regional bus links and commuter rail services that have yet to be fully developed. Local Bus Service Some of Auburn’s most populated neighborhoods are deficient in local bus service, including the West Hill, Lakeland Hills during the non-peak hours, and parts of east and north Auburn. The least served residential area of Auburn is West Hill, an area with approximately 5,000 residents with no transit service. Lakeland Hills, a planned residential community with approximately 3,800 homes has peak hour service to downtown Auburn, but lacks all day service. Lea Hill, a predominantly residential community on Auburn’s east hill, has two transit routes, which predominantly serve Green River College, leaving a large portion of the residents unable to walk to a transit route. In 2014, a license plate survey of the Auburn Station garage indicated that a substantial number of Lea Hill residents utilize transit service at Auburn Station. This suggests that a commuter oriented shuttle serving Lea Hill, similar to the Route 497 shuttle implemented in Lakeland Hills, could be successful. Additionally, residential areas of east Auburn, east of M Street NE and south of 8th Street NE, and parts of northeast Auburn, east of I Street NE, are also located more than ¼ mile from fixed route bus service. It is difficult for these areas to access transit, both for local and regional trips. The design of King County Metro’s local bus routes in Auburn should be reviewed in relation to future changes in Sound Transit’s Sounder commuter rail and regional express bus services to identify opportunities and priorities for productive improvements to transit coverage, frequency, and hours of operation. Regional Bus Service The most important unmet regional transit need is for all day, express bus and commuter rail service between Auburn, Tacoma/Lakewood, and Seattle. While the original Sound Transit Regional Express Bus Service Plan contained a direct link between Auburn and Tacoma/Lakewood, the connection was discontinued in Sound Transit’s later service plans. Sounder Commuter Rail 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 68 Sounder Commuter Rail, a highly popular and attractive service, operates bi-directionally in the peak periods. Most of the trips are operated in the peak direction; northbound during the weekday AM peak and southbound during the weekday PM peak. No midday, evening, or weekend regular service is currently provided, except for the special events times. These services are needed as is additional capacity on some of the currently most popular runs. Intercity Passenger Rail Auburn is an ideal location for a future stop on the Pacific Northwest Rail Corridor, which runs from Vancouver, BC to Eugene, OR. A former Intercity passenger rail stop and Amtrak city, Auburn is centrally located in South King County at the intersection of SR-18 and SR-167 and is a 10 minute drive from I-5. The Auburn Station is the only facility in King or Pierce County with direct freeway access and currently serves over 3,000 bus passengers and 1,300 commuter rail passengers and is centrally located within 10 miles of 500,000 people. Amtrak should implement more intercity rail stations in the high density and traffic congested areas of Puget Sound such as at Auburn Station. A new Auburn stop would have great ridership benefits since it is at a station with available overnight parking and is in close proximity to hundreds of thousands of potential new customers. Furthermore the projected schedule impacts of a stop in Auburn could be largely absorbed in the overall route schedule. TRANSIT SCHEDULING The scheduling of transit service is often as important as route alignment and coverage in determining the success of the service. Scheduling to Successfully Serve Employers One of the most overlooked aspects of transit system design is scheduled transit arrival times versus major employer shift times. While a transit system can physically serve the front door of a business, its actual scheduled arrival times will often determine if anyone rides the system. It is not the intention of this effort to conduct an exhaustive employer shift time analysis of the community. However, an example of the challenge can be found in examining one of Auburn’s major employers, the Boeing Company with over 6,000 employees. The company’s primary morning shift time arrival occurs at 6 AM, the earliest southbound Sounder train from Seattle, arrives in Auburn at 6:32 AM. The first run of the day for the Metro Route 181 from Federal Way and Lea Hill arrive near Boeing at approximately 6 AM, making it difficult for employees to meet the shift time. The first runs of the Route 917 which serve the nearby GSA and SSA offices arrive after the Boeing shift time as well. None of the existing bus routes stop close enough to the Boeing facility to allow employees to walk to the facility. This shows how it is beneficial to continue to coordinate with major employers to offer alternate transit options that can meet various shift times such as dedicated Vanpools or Vanshares. The lack of transit schedule synchronization with key employers in a community can also negatively impact other opportunities. The City of Auburn in partnership with Metro Transit was the first agency in Puget Sound to create the concept of ‘Van Share’, a specialized transit service in which vanpools carry employees to their employer’s front door from regional transit centers. Where the schedules work, such as in providing a direct link between Boeing’s Renton facilities and the Tukwila Station, the concept has been highly successful. On the other end of the trip, the Van Share concept can be successfully 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 69 implemented to transport employees between their homes and the Transit Station, saving capacity on the roadway and at the Auburn Station parking facilities. Due to the fact that Auburn’s major employer shift times sometimes don’t match Sounder and regional bus transit arrival times, Van Share has not yet achieved its full potential in Auburn. However, as Sounder and bus service to the Auburn Station increase, this option may become more viable for major employers in Auburn. To maximize the investment in public transit service in Auburn, it is recommended that both Sound Transit and Metro Transit conduct an evaluation of their schedules with a focus on improving service to major employers in the Auburn area. Transit Capacity A second consideration in scheduling service is ensuring that enough service is available to meet the demand. Sounder Commuter Rail has also been immensely popular, indicating that increased service is supported by the ridership demand. Daily Sounder boardings at south end stations total around 6,000 riders, the equivalent of a lane of traffic on SR 167 or I-5I 5, emphasizing the importance of expanding Sounder service. The Auburn Station is a highly successful component of the Sounder service. Total rail boardings at the Auburn Station today average over 1,300 riders per day making Auburn one of the busiest stations on the Sounder route. URBAN DESIGN The design of the build environment has direct implications on the quality and availability of transit service. Urban design can either encourage or inhibit the provision of local transit service. Some inhibitors to providing neighborhood service include inadequate street geometry and construction, lack of a satisfactory location for a terminal at the end of the route, absence of a street grid that could be used to turn around a bus, and the absence of a connected sidewalk network. Ideally, new residential developments should be laid out with future transit route alignments in mind and supporting transit facilities. Likewise, retrofits of the existing street network should accommodate transit design considerations IMPROVING LOCAL SERVICE Preserving the Route 910 Since 2010 Auburn and Metro Transit have partnered through the Transit Now initiative to implement community shuttle circulator service. The Route 910 shuttle serves Northeast Auburn commercial and activity areas. The service has become steadily more popular, doubling in productivity since its inception. This partnership route between, Auburn and King County Metro has now been extended until 2020. The Transit Now initiative was terminated in 2020. The route 910 service was discontinued in 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic caused service reductions, and was not renewed due to the added service frequency along Auburn Way N, along former route 180, and the changes and added frequency to route 917. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 70 Add Service to Replace the Terminated Route 919 Currently, a planned expansion of service to Metro Route 915 is expected to begin in March, 2016. This will increase service to hourly. Middy on some of the alignment of the former Route 919. The city should continue to look for opportunities to improve service along the route of the former 919. Preserve and Expand Commuter Connection Bus Routes Auburn should work with Pierce Transit, Metro Transit and Sound Transit to preserve the Route 497 and add service to the Route to meet all existing and future Sounder trains while encouraging Sound Transit to fund a portion of the Route 497. Auburn should explore the concept with Metro Transit and Sound Transit of adding a new commuter bus/van service to Sounder from Lea Hill and the west hill of Auburn and encourage Sound Transit to fund a portion of the routes. Similar to the Route 497, these routes would be timed to meet Sounder trains and operate on a direct route and express schedule after leaving the Lea Hill or west hill areas. These potential services are particularly relevant given Metro Transit’s recent focus on the expanded use of Alternative Service concepts for covering areas which cannot support the use of a traditional fixed route bus but which are still in need of public transportation. TRANSIT FACILITIES One type of transit facility improvement stands out as the most important ongoing need: parking. Comparing the number of current Sounder daily boardings (1,300) to the available number of parking stalls at the Auburn Station (633) and the number of passengers who transfer daily from bus to Sounder (approximately 150) shows there is a lack of parking for Sounder at the Auburn Station. Additional train trips are currently being planned, including three new round trips, and these will attract more ridership (and result in more parking needs) in downtown Auburn. Although there is always a desire to have as many people as possible access commuter rail without parking, the reality of the service is that it is usually used by customers who want to start and end their day with a direct, fast trip to and from the station. Only the Route 497 is specifically designed to link commuters to Sounder. It accounts for the majority of transfers between bus service and rail service. Given the strength of the demand for Sounder and the location of many of its users, other lifestyle choices (bike, pedestrian or TOD) will also not be sufficient to ultimately negate the continued demand for more parking. So, for the foreseeable future, parking will be a continuing challenge at the Auburn Station and even more will be needed as three more Sounder roundtrips are added, as scheduled in 2016 and 2017. Building the infrastructure to accommodate commuter parking demand is an essential component of making transit an attractive option for commuters. In order to do so, action is essential to clearly identify the future demand and acquire the land needed to build the parking. The plans created in ST2 and ST3 (ST2 is the Sound Transit Plan approved by voters during 2008, ST3 was approved by voters in November 2016 to build parking should be followed. If this is not done, neighborhoods within walking distance of Auburn Station, particularly those bordering W Main Street, will experience an increase in on-street commuter parking, making it difficult for residents to find parking during the day and early evening. To combat this issue, the City has established a restricted parking zone for residents to the 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 71 west of C Street NW, however the problem may begin in other locations. Sound Transit should also examine the usage of the Auburn Station garage by people who live outside the Sound Transit Taxing District. The agency should consider requiring those users to pay to park in the Auburn Station garage. In a 2014 survey of the vehicles parked at the Auburn facility over 90 vehicles (15 percent of the parking supply) were registered at addresses outside the Sound Transit Taxing District. King County Metro Transit is responsible for installing new and maintaining existing bus shelters in Auburn. Both the City and agency should continue to prioritize potential improvements to shelters, benches, pads, bus zones, customer information and pedestrian access. Currently, about 20 Metro bus stops that meet warrants for the installation of shelters have not received them yet and City staff is focused on working with Metro to accomplish that installation. Pedestrian improvements around existing or planned transit stops, including enhanced crosswalks and pedestrian refuges, should also be examined by the City. The placement of bus stops is driven by a variety of criteria including transit system operating and design standards, professional engineering field evaluation, and public input. 4.3 TRANSIT SYSTEM RECOMMENDATIONS This section contains the recommendations derived from the transit needs assessment, as discussed in the first part of this chapter. Recommendations are organized by lead agency, with the understanding that implementation of any major system improvement will require the collaboration of many agencies. KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT Maintain the operation of the Route 910 in partnership with Metro Transit. Explore partnering with Metro Transit and the Muckleshoot Indian tribe to create a new route combining the best features of the former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shuttle to provide better transit service to the city and the Reservation. Work with Metro Transit to create new, limited stop AM and PM peak transit services designed for commuters from Lea Hill and west hill to and from the downtown Auburn Station. Conduct an evaluation of transit schedules; improve service to major employers. Work with Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains. Work with Metro Transit to implement the Rapid Ride I line which is part of Metro Connects Work with Metro Transit to introduce new Mobility Options to improve access to Rapid Ride and other high capacity transit services, such as Sound Transit commuter rail and regional bus routes Explore, assist, and encourage the implementation of commuter Vanpool and Van Share, linking Boeing to the Auburn Station, to meet Sounder and Regional bus routes. PIERCE TRANSIT Work with Pierce Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains. SOUND TRANSIT 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 72 Work with Sound Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains and fund a portion of the Route. Work with Sound Transit to add new commuter bus service to the Sounder from Lea Hill and West Hill and fund a portion of the routes. Institute midday Sounder service to and from Tacoma/Lakewood and Seattle and plan for evening and weekend service in the near future. Address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Station due to the use of the overcrowded Sounder parking facility by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound Transit taxing district and pay nothing for the facility. Continue to work with the City of Auburn to create additional parking near the Auburn Station, as specified in ST2. CITY OF AUBURN Partner with local transit agencies to provide transit service similar to the route 497 to serve other areas of Auburn, including the Lea Hill Area. The route would collect commuters to provide them access to the Sounder Station in downtown Auburn. Explore partnering with the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe to create a new route combining the best features of the former Route 919 and the MIT tribal shuttle to provide better transit service to the City and the Reservation. Work with Pierce Transit and Metro Transit to add service to the Route 497 to meet more Sounder trains and encourage Sound Transit to fund a portion of the Route 497 to continue the route in service for multiple years beyond 2016. Continue to work with Sound Transit to address the loss of existing parking at the Auburn Station due to the use of the overcrowded Sounder parking facility by Sounder riders who live outside the Sound Transit taxing district and pay nothing for the facility. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 73 CHAPTER 5 – POLICIES Transportation objectives and policies establish the framework for realizing the City’s vision of its transportation system. Policies provide guidance for the City, other governmental entities and private developers, enabling the City to achieve its goal in accordance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The policy framework presented below is a guideline, which the City will use to evaluate individual projects and address its infrastructure needs. The objectives and policies are organized according to five broad headings. The first heading, Coordination, Planning and Implementation, addresses the system comprehensively, detailing policies that pertain to the planning and implementation of the system as a whole. The subsequent four headings list policies specific to the following systems: Street system, Non-motorized system, Transit system, and Air transportation. The analysis of the transportation system, as well as any individual proposals, shall consider all modes of transportation and all methods of efficiently managing the network. GOAL To plan, expand, and improve the transportation system in cooperation and coordination with adjacent and regional jurisdictions to ensure concurrency compliance with the growth management act, and to provide a safe and efficient multimodal system that meets the community needs and facilitates the land use plan. 5.1 COORDINATION, PLANNING, AND IMPLEMENTATION OBJECTIVE: COORDINATION To be consistent with regional plans and the plans of neighboring cities, to encourage partnerships, and not to unreasonably preclude an adjacent jurisdiction from implementing its planned improvements. Coord-01: Coordinate transportation operations, planning and improvements with other transportation authorities and governmental entities (cities, counties, tribes, state, federal) to address transportation issues. These include:  Improvement of the state highway network through strong advocacy with state officials, both elected and staff, for improvements to state highways and interchanges;  Improvements to roadways connecting Auburn to the surrounding region, including SR 167, SR 18, SR 181/West Valley Hwy, SR 164, and S 277th Street;  Improved access to the Interstate 5 corridor and regional employment centers;  Transit connections to the Regional Growth Centers;  Establishing the Auburn Station as a center for multi-modal transportation connections to proposed future intercity rail service;  Strong advocacy with US congressional members to provide funding to mitigate transportation problems connected to interstate commerce; and  Proactively pursuing forums to coordinate transportation project priorities among other governmental entities, including proposed future intercity rail service. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 74 OBJECTIVE: LONG-RANGE PLANNING & PROGRAMMING To continue to plan for the future of the multi-modal transportation system through long-range planning, programmatic planning, and financial planning, in compliance with the Growth Management Act. Plan-01: The Comprehensive Transportation Plan shall be evaluated and amended annually to ensure it is technically accurate, consistent with state, regional, and other local plans, and in keeping with the City's vision of the future transportation system. Plan-02: The Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) shall be updated annually to reevaluate project priorities, develop a plan to fund capital improvement projects, and ensure consistency between project priorities and financing plans. Project evaluation criteria shall foster economic development, maximize utilization of city financing to match transportation grants, promote safety, integrate planning of other projects requiring disturbance of pavements, promote mobility, and optimize the utilization of existing infrastructure. OBJECTIVE: SAFETY To provide a transportation system that is safe for all users. Safety-01: A safe and efficient transportation system shall be prioritized over driving convenience. Safety-02: Utilize education to increase awareness of existing traffic laws and safety issues, especially as they relate to pedestrians and bicyclists. Safety-03: Engage the community in transportation issues through public involvement and partnerships with organizations such as the Auburn School District. Safety-04: Identify areas with persistent traffic violations and address these violations, in part, through Police Department enforcement. Safety-05: Emphasize enforcement of the "rules of the road" for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists whose actions endanger others. Conduct enforcement in a manner that reinforces the messages found in non-motorized education & safety programs. Safety-06: Recognize the potential effects of hazards on transportation facilities and incorporate such considerations into the planning and design of transportation projects, where feasible. OBJECTIVE: CONNECTIVITY To provide a highly interconnected network of streets and trails for ease and variety of travel. Connect-01: An efficient transportation system seeks to spread vehicle movements over a series of planned streets. The goal of the system is to encourage connectivity while preventing unacceptably high traffic volumes on any one street. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate access for 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 75 emergency vehicles. For these reasons the City will continue to plan a series of collectors and arterials designed to national standards to provide efficient service to the community. Connect-02: Encourage the use of trails and other connections that provide ease of travel within and between neighborhoods, community activity centers, and transit services. Development patterns that block direct pedestrian access are discouraged. Ample alternatives should exist to accommodate non- motorized transportation on arterials, collectors, and local roads. OBJECTIVE: ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Minimize the environmental impacts of all new transportation projects and transportation related improvements. Environ-01: Thoroughly evaluate the impacts of all transportation projects and apply appropriate mitigation measures in conformance with SEPA, the Critical Areas Ordinance, and other city, county, state, and federal regulations. Environ-02: Identify and consider the environmental impacts of transportation projects at the earliest possible time to ensure planning and decisions reflect environmental values, to avoid delays later in the process, and to reduce or avoid potential problems that may adversely impact the environment and project outcome. Environ-03: Incorporate Low Impact Development (LID), green technology, and sustainability practices into transportation improvements as primary alternatives whenever feasible. Environ-04: Support efforts to improve air quality throughout the Auburn area and develop a transportation system compatible with the goals of the Federal and State Clean Air Acts. Environ-05: Require air quality studies of future major development to assess impacts created by site generated traffic. OBJECTIVE: LEVEL-OF-SERVICE (LOS) THRESHOLD To ensure that new development does not degrade transportation facilities to below LOS standards. LOS-01: New development shall not be allowed when the impacts of the new development on the transportation system degrades the LOS to below the adopted LOS standard, unless the impacts are mitigated concurrent with the development as described in Chapter 2. LOS-02: The term "below level-of-service" shall apply to situations where traffic attributed to a development likely results in any of the following.  An unacceptable increase in hazard or an unacceptable decrease in safety at an intersection or on a roadway segment.  An accelerated deterioration of the street pavement condition or the proposed regular use of a street not designated as a truck route for truck movements that can reasonably result in accelerated deterioration of the street pavement.  An unacceptable impact on geometric design conditions at an intersection where two truck routes meet on the City arterial and collector network.  An increase in congestion which constitutes an unacceptable adverse environmental 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 76 impact under the State Environmental Policy Act.  An increase in queuing that causes blocking of adjacent land uses or intersections.  A reduction in any of the four (4) LOS standards below. 1. Arterial and Collector Corridor LOS: The level-of-service standard for each arterial and collector corridor is “D”, unless otherwise specified in Chapter 2 of this plan. The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine a shorter or longer corridor segment than is specified in Chapter 2, to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 2. Signalized Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for signalized intersections is “D”, with the following exceptions; for signalized intersections of two Arterial roads the level -of- service standard during the AM and PM peak periods is “E” for a maximum duration of 30 minutes and for signalized intersections of two Principal Arterial roads the level-of-service standard during the AM and PM peak periods is “E” for a maximum duration of 60 minutes. The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine individual signalized or roundabout intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project's total LOS impacts are evaluated. 3. Two-Way and All-Way Stop Controlled Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for two- way stop controlled and all-way stop controlled intersections, is “D”. If LOS falls below the standard, analysis and mitigation may be required in a manner commensurate with the associated impacts. This may include, among other requirements, conducting a traffic signal warrant analysis and installing or financing a signal or roundabout. 4. Roundabout Intersection LOS: The level-of-service standard for roundabout controlled intersections is “D”. The City may require a development or redevelopment to examine to examine roundabout intersections for LOS impacts to ensure a project’s total LOS impacts are evaluated. LOS-03: Establish a multi-modal level-of-service system in the future. LOS-04: PM level of service is the city standard. AM level of service may need to be analyzed in situations where specialized conditions exist that disproportionately impact AM traffic. OBJECTIVE: CONCURRENCY To ensure transportation facilities do not fall below the adopted level-of-service standard, as required by the Growth Management Act. GMA-01: Require developments to construct or finance transportation improvements and/or implement strategies that mitigate the impacts of new development concurrent with (within 6 years of) development, as required by the Growth Management Act. GMA-02: New development that lowers a facility’s level-of-service standard below the locally adopted minimum standard shall be denied, as required by the Growth Management Act. Strategies that may allow a development to proceed include, but are not limited to:  Reducing the scope of a project (e.g. platting fewer lots or building less square footage);  Building or financing new transportation improvements concurrent with (within 6 years 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 77 of) development;  Phasing/delaying a project;  Requiring the development to incorporate Transportation Demand Management strategies; or  Lowering level-of-service standards. GMA-03: The denial of development in order to maintain concurrency may be grounds for declaring an emergency for the purpose of amending the Comprehensive Plan outside of the annual amendment cycle. OBJECTIVE: QUALITY OF LIFE To improve the quality of life for Auburn residents and businesses through design of the transportation system. QOL-01: Enhance the livability of Auburn through a variety of mechanisms, including the innovative design and construction of roadways, non- motorized facilities, and associated improvements. Apply design standards that result in attractive and functional transportation facilities. OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT (TSM) To efficiently operate the existing transportation system through Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies, thereby maximizing resources and reducing the need for costly system capacity expansion projects. TSM-01: Use TSM strategies to more efficiently utilize the existing infrastructure to optimize traffic flow and relieve congestion. Examples include:  Re-channelization/restriping, adding turn lanes, adding /increasing number of through lanes  Signal interconnect and optimization;  Turn movement restrictions;  Access Management; and  Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). TSM-02: Support Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) implementation in coordination with Map 2-7. Future ITS corridors will be prioritized using the following criteria.  Grants, loans, or partner funding can be leveraged to expand the ITS system on a specific corridor(s).  There is existing infrastructure that would make it easier and more cost efficient to implement ITS elements.  The corridor(s) completes a logical segment or missing link in the citywide ITS network.  Significant travel-time savings can be achieved with ITS implementation. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 78  Corridor supports other City communication and technology needs.  ITS implementation would have significant safety benefits, including reducing the need for police flaggers in intersections during events. TSM-03: ITS elements include but are not limited to:  Operational improvements such as traffic signal coordination;  Traveler information including traffic alerts and emergency notification;  Incident management; and  Traffic data collection. TSM-04: Require development to contribute its share of ITS improvements as mitigation. TSM-05: Program signal timing to encourage specific movements and the use of travel routes that are underutilized. OBJECTIVE: TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) To utilize transportation demand management strategies to lessen demand for increased street system capacity, help maintain the LOS standard, and enhance quality of life for those who use and benefit from the transportation system. TDM-01: Encourage the use of high-occupancy vehicles (buses, carpool, and vanpool) through both private programs and under the direction of Metro and Pierce Transit. TDM-02: Promote reduced employee travel during the daily peak travel periods through flexible work schedules and programs to allow employees to wor k part-time or full-time or at alternate work sites closer to home. TDM-03: Encourage employers to provide TDM measures in the workplace through such programs as preferential parking for high-occupancy vehicles, car sharing, improved access for transit vehicles, and employee incentives for using high-occupancy vehicles. TDM-04: In making funding decisions, consider transportation investments that support transportation demand management approaches by providing alternatives to single-occupant vehicles, such as transit, bikeways and pedestrian paths. TDM-05: Recognize emerging TDM strategies such as tolling, variable-priced lanes, and car sharing may be effective in certain situations. TDM-06: Coordinate with Metro and other jurisdictions to enhance Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) programs for CTR employers in Auburn. TDM-07: Lead by example through implementation of a thorough and successful Commute -Trip Reduction (CTR) Program for City employees. OBJECTIVE: PARKING 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 79 To ensure adequate coordination of parking needs with traffic and development needs and support development of a regional park-and ride lot system by Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit, and the Washington State Department of Transportation. Parking-01: On-street parking should be allowed only when consistent with the function of the street and with traffic volumes. Parking-02: New developments should provide adequate off-street parking to meet their needs. Parking-03: Develop and maintain regulations, which foster a balance between meeting the need for public parking and ensuring developers provide adequate parking to meet the demand generated by new development. Parking-04: In certain cases, such as in the Regional Growth Center and in areas with high pedestrian and transit use, it may be appropriate to reduce the developer parking obligation to achieve other community benefits or employ innovative parking strategies such as the use of "park & walk" lots, where people could park their vehicles and walk to nearby destinations. Parking-05: The City shall evaluate new residential subdivisions with constrained space for driveways, utility services, street lights, street trees, and fire hydrants and the resultant impact on the provision of adequate on-street parking. Where appropriate, the City shall require the subdivision to provide dispersed locations of on-street parking (or street accessible parking) to meet their needs in addition to the zoning code required off -street parking. Parking-06: Encourage park & ride lots on sites adjacent to compatible land uses with convenient access to the Auburn Station, SR 18, SR 167, and all regional transportation corridors. Parking-07: Work proactively with Sound Transit, WSDOT, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to ensure the adequate supply of park & ride capacity in Auburn. OBJECTIVE: RIGHT-OF-WAY To retain and preserve existing right-of-way, and identify and acquire new right-of-way as needed to achieve the City's objectives. ROW-01: The acquisition and preservation of right-of-way is a key component of maintaining a viable transportation system. Methods used to acquire and preserve right-of-way include:  Requiring dedication of right-of-way as a condition of development;  Purchasing right-of-way at fair market value; and  Acquiring development rights and easements from property owners. ROW-02: Preserve and protect existing right-of-way through the issuance of permits such as ROW Use permits and franchise agreements, by monitoring and responding to right -of- way encroachments and safety impacts, and by limiting vacations of public right-of-way. ROW-03: Vacate right-of-way only when it clearly will not be a future need or to support economic development. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 80 OBJECTIVE: MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION To maintain the City’s transportation system at a level that is comparable with the design standards applied to new facilities. Prsrv-01: Establish programs and schedules for the level and frequency of roadway and non - motorized system maintenance. Prsrv-02: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street system, the City shall prohibit non-local trip heavy vehicles from traveling on city streets , unless the City permits such travel via the issuance of a temporary haul permit that requires appropriate mitigation. Prsrv-03: Establish standards of street repair and seek to obtain sufficient financing to attain and maintain a safe system in good condition. Prsrv-04: Continue to implement the “Save Our Streets” program for maintenance and rehabilitation of local streets. Prsrv-05: Continue to implement the arterial/collector streets maintenance and rehabilitation program. Prsrv-06: Develop and implement operations and maintenance procedures to ensure ongoing effectiveness of LID infrastructure. Prsrv-07: In order to help ensure the long term preservation of the city street system, the City may prohibit trenching or cutting into newly constructed or newly overlaid pavements for a period of 5 years. Overlays of up to the full roadway width of affected pavement surface should be required as mitigation in the event cuts into new pavements cannot be avoided. Prsrv-08: City shall notify and coordinate with all private and public utilities within the City limits when planning to complete pavement overlay’s or reconstruction. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 81 Save our Streets – Patching Treatment Save our Streets- Overlay 5.2 STREET SYSTEM OBJECTIVE: COMPLETE STREETS Ensure Auburn’s transportation system is designed to enable comprehensive, integrated, safe access for users of all abilities including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit riders and operators, and truck operators. Street-01: Plan for and develop a balanced transportation system, which provides safe access and connectivity to transportation facilities for users of all ages and abilit ies including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists, transit users and operators, and truck operators. Street-02: Plan for, design, and construct all transportation projects, whether City led or development driven, to provide appropriate accommodation for bicyclists, pedestrians, and transit users in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, except in situations where the establishment of such facilities would be contrary to public health and safety or the cost would be excessively disproportionate to the need. Street-03: Ensure the transportation system meets the requirements outlined in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) ) and the ADA Transition Plan for Facilities in the Public ROW and its policies. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 82 Street-04: The Auburn Engineering Design Standards is the primary vehicle for executing the Complete Streets Objective and should include standards for each roadway classification to guide implementation. Street-05: Context and flexibility in balancing user needs shall be considered in the design of all projects and if necessary, a deviation from the Auburn Engineering Design Standards may be granted to ensure the Complete Streets Objective and supporting policies are achieved. OBJECTIVE: STREET NETWORK To provide an integrated street network of appropriate classes of streets designed to facilitate different types of traffic flows and access needs. Street-06: The city street system shall be made up of three classes of streets:  Arterials - a system of city, county, and state streets designed to move traffic to or from major traffic and activity generators. Arterials should be adequate in number, appropriately situated, and designed to accommodate moderate to high traffic volumes with a minimum of flow disruption.  Collectors - a system of city streets that collect traffic and move it from the local street system to the arterial street system.  Local streets - a system of city streets, which collect traffic from individual sites and conveys the traffic to the collector and arterial systems. Street-07: The Functional Roadway Classifications Map shall serve as the adopted standard for identifying classified streets in the City of Auburn and the potential annexation areas. Street-08: Ensure all eligible streets classified in the Comprehensive Transportation Plan are federally classified. Street-09: Street standards shall be developed, modified, and implemented that reflect the street classification system and function. The design and management of the street network shall seek to improve the appearance of existing street corridors. Streets are recognized as an important component of the public spaces within the City and should include, where appropriate, landscaping to enhance the appearance of city street corridors. The standards should include provisions for streetscaping. Street-10: The classification standards adopted in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards are considered the City’s minimum standards for new streets. In cases in which the City attempts to rebuild an existing street within an established right- of-way, the City Council reserves the authority to determine if additional right-of-way should be obtained in order to realize the improvement. Preservation of neighborhood continuity and cohesiveness will be respected. Street-11: The standards for residential streets may be modified in cross section to provide better relationships between the different components of the street including, but not limited to, on-street parking, the landscape strip, and the sidewalk. Among other objectives, this may be done to balance the need to provide adequate parking and buffer pedestrians from traffic. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 83 Street-12: These minimum standards do not limit or prevent developers from providing facilities that exceed the City’s standards. Street-13: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of arterial designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. Street-14: Designate new arterials to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Arterials shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. Street-15: Encourage King and Pierce counties to develop and implement a similar system of collector designations within Auburn's potential annexation area. Street-16: Designate new collectors to serve developing areas concurrent with approval of such development. Collectors shall be spaced in compliance with good transportation network planning principles, and support the importance of overall system circulation. Street-17: Access Tracts may be permitted, as long as emergency access can be guaranteed at all times. Street-18: The local street network shall be developed to maximize the efficiency of the transportation network in residential areas and minimize through traffic in neighborhoods.  The internal local residential street network for a subdivision should be designed to discourage regional through traffic and non-residential traffic from penetrating the subdivision or adjacent subdivisions.  Where possible, streets shall be planned, designed and constructed to connect to future development.  When applicable, non-motorized paths shall be provided at the end of dead end streets to shorten walking distances to an adjacent arterial or public facilities including, but not limited to, schools and parks.  Residential developments should be planned in a manner that minimizes the number of local street accesses to arterials and collectors.  To promote efficient connectivity between areas of the community, existing stub end streets shall be linked to other streets in new development whenever the opportunity arises and the resulting traffic volumes are not likely to exceed acceptable volumes as identified in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards. OBJECTIVE: PRIVATE STREETS To discourage the development of private streets and ensure, if they are permitted by the City, they are constructed and maintained according to City standards. Street-19: Private streets are discouraged, but may be permitted on a discretionary basis, as regulated by city code and the Auburn Engineering Design Standards. Street-20: If a private street is permitted, it must be built to public street standards as identified in the Auburn Engineering Design Standards and Construction Standards manuals. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 84 Street-21: Private streets must provide for emergency vehicle access and be privately maintained by an approved association or business. The City does not maintain private streets. OBJECTIVE: ACCESS MANAGEMENT To limit and provide access to the street network in a manner which improves and maintains public safety and roadway capacity. Street-22: Seek consolidation of access points to state highways, arterials, and collectors. This will benefit the highway and city street system, reduce interference with traffic flows on arterials, and discourage through traffic on local streets. To achi eve this level of access control, the City:  Adopts and supports the State’s controlled access policy on all state highway facilities;  May acquire access rights along some arterials and collectors;  Adopts design standards that identify access standards for each type of functional street classification;  Encourages consolidation of access in developing commercial and high density residential areas through shared use of driveways and local access streets; and  Will establish standards for access management, develop a planning process to work with the community and implement access management solutions on arterial corridors. Street-23: Strive to prevent negative impacts to existing businesses, without compromising safety, when implementing access management. OBJECTIVE: THROUGH TRAFFIC To accommodate through traffic in the City as efficiently as possible, with a minimum of disruption to neighborhoods. Street-24: Continue to coordinate with the Washington State Department of Transportation to facilitate the movement of traffic through the City. Street-25: Encourage the State and Counties to develop through routes, which minimize the impact of through traffic on Auburn's residential neighborhoods. Street-26: Actively solicit action by the State and Counties to program and construct those improvements needed to serve Auburn to the state and county arterial and freeway systems. OBJECTIVE: TRAFFIC CALMING To employ traffic calming techniques to improve safety and neighborhood quality. Street-27: Implement the City’s traffic calming program to improve neighborhood safety and quality. Street-28: The traffic calming program shall require a technical analysis of existing conditions and appropriate treatments before actions are taken to fund and implement traffic calming 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 85 measures. Street-29: The traffic calming program shall incorporate neighborhood involvement and seek community support. Street-30: New construction should incorporate traffic calming measures, as appropriate. OBJECTIVE: FREIGHT MOVEMENTS To facilitate the movements of freight and goods through Auburn with minimal adverse traffic and other environmental impacts. Freight-01: The movement of freight and goods is recognized as an important component of Auburn’s transportation system. Freight-02: The movement of freight and goods which serve largely national, state, or regional needs should take place in such a way so that the impacts on the local transportation system are minimized. These movements should take place primarily on state highways, Interstates, or on grade-separated rail corridors in order to minimize the local impacts. Freight-03: Seek public and private partners to leverage funds for freight improvement projects and associated mitigation. Freight-04: Continue to work with the Freight Mobility Roundtable, FAST, FMSIB, and other local and regional groups to ensure regional needs are met, and local impacts are mitigated. Freight-05: All through truck trips and the majority of local trips shall take place on designated truck routes, as identified on the truck route map, Map 2-3, of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. This policy shall not apply to developments and uses operating und er existing right-of-way use permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements directly related to the regulation of permitted haul routes. Freight-06: If the City is unable to acquire funding to maintain existing truck routes to a Pavement Condition Index Standard of 70 on a segment of roadway, that route may be restricted or closed to truck travel. Freight-07: Work towards designing and constructing future truck routes, as identified on the truck route map in Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan, to sustain routine truck traffic. Freight-08: Local truck trips that have origins and/or destinations in Auburn may have to sometimes use routes not designated as truck routes. The City may approve the use of alternate routes not currently designated as truck routes for truck traffic, with appropriate mitigation. Approval may be made through issuance of right -of-way use permits, traffic mitigation agreements or equivalent agreements. Freight-09: Development shall be required to mitigate the impacts of construction generated truck traffic on the City’s transportation system, based on the City’s LOS standard. Freight-10: Temporary haul routes for overweight or oversized vehicles shall be permitted under circumstances acceptable to the City and with appropriate mitigation. A temporary haul 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 86 permit must be obtained prior to the hauling of oversized or overweight freight. Freight-11: Truck traffic in residential neighborhoods shall be prohibited, except for local deliveries within said neighborhood, unless no other possible route is available, in which case mitigation may be required. OBJECTIVE: LATECOMER POLICY To enable private investors to recover a portion of improvement costs for transportation facility improvements that benefit other developments. LC-01: The City may enter into latecomer (payback) agreements where substantial transportation investments are made by one party that legitimately should be reimbursed by others, such as, when the infrastructure improvement will benefit a future d evelopment. Such agreements will be at the discretion of the City Council. Latecomer or payback agreements do not apply to situations in which a property owner is required to construct improvements per an existing city code provision, such as in the case of half-street and other frontage improvements. OBJECTIVE: ROUNDABOUTS To seek air quality, safety, and capacity benefits by promoting the use of roundabouts over traffic signals. RB-01: Intersections controlled with roundabouts are preferred over signalized intersections whenever feasible and appropriate due to the benefits achieved with roundabouts including reduced collision rate for vehicles and pedestrians, less severe collisions, smoother traffic flow, reduced vehicle emissions and fuel consumption, lower long-term maintenance costs, and improved aesthetics. RB-02: Developments required to signalize an intersection as mitigation for a project may be required to install a roundabout instead of a traffic signal. The feasibility of acquiring the land needed for a roundabout will be considered as a factor in this requirement. 5.3 NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM OBJECTIVE: PLANNING THE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM To plan a coordinated, interconnected network of non-motorized transportation facilities that effectively provide access to local and regional destinations, improve overall quality of life, and support healthy community and environmental principles. NM-01: Implement land use regulations and encourage site design that promotes non- motorized forms of transportation. NM-02: Include the role of non-motorized transportation in all transportation planning, programming, and if suitable, capital improvement projects. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 87 NM-03: Plan for continuous non-motorized circulation routes within and between existing, new or redeveloping commercial, residential, and industrial developments. Transportation planning shall seek to allow pedestrians and bicyclists the ability to cross or avoid barriers in a manner that is safe and convenient. NM-04: Actively seek to acquire land along corridors identified for future trail development in the current Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Auburn Parks, Recreation, & Open Space Plan 2005 AND SUBSCEQUENT Parks plans. NM-05: Schedule, plan and co-sponsor events that support recreational walking and bicycling. These events should emphasize their recreational and health values and introduce people to the transportation capabilities of bicycling and walking. NM-06: Improve and protect the non-motorized transportation system through the establishment of level-of-service goals for non-motorized facilities. OBJECTIVE: DEVELOPING THE NON-MOTORIZED SYSTEM To build a safe, attractive, and inter-connected non-motorized transportation system. NM-06: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike routes and walkways, to encourage significant recreational use. NM-07: Develop and maintain the non-motorized system, including bike routes, sidewalks, and multi-use paths in a manner that promotes non -motorized travel as a viable mode of transportation. NM-08: Develop the non-motorized system to accommodate appropriate alternative forms of non- motorized transport, as well as medically necessary motorized transport. NM-09: Appropriate street furniture, lighting, signage, and landscaping should be installed along non-motorized routes to increase safety and to ensure that facilities are inviting to users. NM-10: Clearly sign and mark major non-motorized routes to guide travelers and improve safety. NM-11: Non-motorized routes shall be constructed to accommodate emergency vehicle access and be amenable to law enforcement. NM-12: Locate and design non-motorized transportation systems so that they contribute to the safety, efficiency, enjoyment and convenience of residential neighborhoods. NM-13: The development of facilities supporting non-motorized transportation should be provided as a regular element of new construction projects. Improvements shall be secured through the development review process. NM-14: Minimize hazards and obstructions on the non-motorized transportation system by properly designing, constructing, managing, and maintaining designated routes in the system. OBJECTIVE: PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 88 To enhance and encourage pedestrian travel in Auburn. Ped-01: Promote pedestrian travel within the city and connections to adjacent communities with emphasis placed on safety and on connectivity to priority destinations such as schools, parks, the downtown, and other pedestrian-oriented areas. Pedestrian-oriented areas are those areas with high pedestrian traffic or potential and are identified in this plan. These areas and streets shall encourage pedestrian travel by providing enhanced pedestrian improvements or controls on motorized traffic. Ped-02: Focus investments on and aggressively seek funding for the high priority pedestrian corridors, identified in Map 3-2. Ped-03: Require developers to incorporate pedestrian facilities into new development and redevelopment in conformance with the Auburn City Code. Ped-04: Continue to construct new and rehabilitate existing sidewalks through a sidewalk improvement program. Ped-05: Seek ways to provide pedestrian amenities such as streetlights, trees, seating areas, signage, and public art along all major pedestrian travel routes. Ped-06: Work towards buffering pedestrian walkways from moving traffic, particularly in areas with high levels of pedestrian movements, such as near schools and commercial areas, and along corridors with heavy vehicular traffic. Ped-07: Pedestrian crossings shall be developed at locations with significant pedestrian traffic and designed to match pedestrian desire lines. Ped-08: Encourage the formation of LIDs to develop pedestrian pathways and other non - motorized amenities throughout the City. Partner with the local school dist ricts to improve Safe Walking Routes to School. OBJECTIVE: BICYCLE TRAVEL To improve Auburn's bicycling network. Bike-01: Develop programs and publications, and work with local employers to encourage citywide bicycle commuting. Bike-02: Designate, develop, and maintain high priority bicycle routes, in conformance with Map 3- 4, that create an interconnected system of bike facilities for local and regional travel, including on- street bike routes, and multi-purpose trails. Bike-03: During the development review process, ensure projects are consistent with the Non - motorized chapter of the Comprehensive Transportation Plan by requiring right -of-way dedications and other improvements as needed to develop the bicycle network. Bike-04: Focus investments on and aggressively seek funding for the high priority future bicycle corridors, identified in Map 3-4 and corridors and connectors, as applicable, specified in Map 3- 5. Bike-05: Encourage the inclusion of convenient and secure bicycle storage facilities in all large 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 89 public and private developments. Bike-06: Continue to develop and implement Sharrows and associated Share the Road signage in residential and some non-residential areas of City. Bike-07: Continue installation of bike lanes in parts of City where there is existing/adequate right- of-way. Bike-08: Develop an Auburn specific bicycle signage program to highlight corridors, connectors and in-city/out of city destinations. Bike-09: Make improvements to existing Interurban Trail – signage, pavement conditions, vegetation maintenance, grade crossings, and upgrades to user facilities at Main Street crossing. Bike-10: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate for the design and construction of bicycle/pedestrian bridge at southern ter minus of M St. west of existing Stuck River Vehicle Bridge. Bike-11: Develop a capital improvement program project with cost estimate for the design and construction of innovative and safe pedestrian/bicycle crossing at M St./Auburn Way South intersection. Bike-12: Install one or more bike boxes through a pilot program approach to test effectiveness and public response. Focus pilot program efforts at key intersections such as the West Main Street and C Street intersection, the M Street and Auburn Way South intersection and the Ellingson Road and A Street intersection. Bike-13: Continue to install bicycle/pedestrian crossing warning systems along Interurban Trail at all crossing locations consisting of S 277th Street, 37th Street NW, and W Main Street. Bike-14: Develop and maintain an official Auburn Bicycling Guide Map. Bike-15: In coordination with the City Council, Mayor’s Office, Auburn Area Chamber of Commerce, Auburn Tourism Board and appropriate City departments develop strategies and actions for the implementation of the bicycle oriented economic development recommendations of the Auburn Bicycle Task Force. 5.4 TRANSIT SYSTEM OBJECTIVE: TRANSIT SERVICES To encourage the continued development of public transit systems and other alternatives to single occupant vehicle travel, to relieve traffic congestion, to reduce reliance on the automobile for personal transportation needs, to improve route coverage and scheduling, and to ensure transit is a convenient and reliable mode option for both local and regional trips. Transit-01: Partner with WSDOT, Metro Transit, Pierce Transit, Sound Transit, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and private businesses to achieve Auburn's transit and passenger rail objectives. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 90 Transit-02: Work with local and regional transit agencies to serve new and existing trip generators in Auburn, such as colleges, commercial areas, and community facilities. Transit-03: Encourage Sound Transit, Metro Transit, and Pierce Transit to expand transit to underserved areas of Auburn. Transit-04: Partner with WSDOT, Amtrak, and Sound Transit to establish an intercity passenger rail stop at the Auburn Station. Transit-05: Consider both the transit impacts and the opportunities presented by major development proposals when reviewing development under the State Environmental Policy Act. Transit-06: Encourage the inclusion of transit facilities in new development when appropriate. Transit-07: Encourage bus stops to be located at well-lit and accessible areas. Transit-08: Work with transit providers and regional agencies to develop a transit system that is fully accessible to pedestrians and the physically challenged, and which integrates the access, safety, and parking requirements of bicyclists. Transit-09: Identify areas of concentrated transit traffic and impose design and construction standards that accommodate the unique considerations associated with bus travel, such as street geometry and pedestrian linkages. Transit-10: Work with transit providers to create new commuter – oriented transit routes and maintain existing commuter routes linked with Sounder commuter rail. Transit-11: Develop rider information packages that inform users of commuter, transit, rail, trail, and air transportation opportunities. 5.5 AIR TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE: AIR TRANSPORTATION To provide an efficient municipal airport, serving light general aviation aircraft, as an integral part of the City’s transportation system. Air-01: Continue to develop the Auburn Municipal Airport in accordance with the Airport Master Plan. Air-02: The airport shall be managed as a general aviation facility; the use of jet aircrafts and helicopters that create noise and land use conflicts shall be evaluated, in conformance with FAA regulations.. General aviation includes all civilian flying except scheduled passenger airline service. Air-03: The siting of new airport facilities shall consider neighborhood impacts such as increased noise generated from the use of those facilities.When siting new or revised facilities or operations at the airport, the impacts on neighborhoods such as increased noise generated from the use of those facilities shall be considered. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 91 Air-04: Use of the airport by non-conventional aircraft such as ultra lights shall be discouraged, in conformance with FAA regulations.Use of the airport by non-conventional aircraft such as ultra lights is discouraged by the City. Air-05: The City’s zoning ordinance and other appropriate regulatory measures shall enforce the airport clear zones as regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The impact of development on air safety shall be assessed through SEPA review, and appropriate mitigation measures shall be required by the City. Air-0605: Minimize or eliminate the potentially adverse effects of light and glare on the operation of the Auburn Airport. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 92 CHAPTER 6 – FUNDING The ability to finance the maintenance and enhancement of the transportation system is critical to the implementation of this plan and the success of the future transportation system. This chapter details the financial planning tools and funding mechanisms available to accomplish these goals. 6.1 FINANCIAL PLANNING AND PROGRAMMING The City updates its financial plan annually in order to ensure programmed transportation improvements are financially feasible and prioritized in accordance with available funds. The Transportation Improvement Program and Capital Facilities Plan are the two financial planning documents the City uses to identify its financial strategy for implementing transportation improvements. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM The Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) is a six year plan which lists programmed transportation improvements in the following categories: roadway improvement projects, intersection improvement projects, non-motorized and transit projects, preliminary engineering and miscellaneous projects, and preservation projects. Transportation needs are identified by examining the latest information concerning safety and accident history, growth trends, the traffic model, traffic studies, and the Comprehensive Transportation Plan. The City adopts an updated TIP annually, including a revenue forecast and analysis of available funding. Projects are then prioritized according to a number of factors including safety, capacity n eeds, access needs, and the likelihood of securing funding. The first three years of the TIP must be financially constrained, so project programming is often limited due to funding limitations. The TIP is an important tool for identifying funding and developing a financial plan for project implementation. It also feeds into the Capital Facilities Plan. CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN The Capital Facilities Plan (CFP) is the Comprehensive Plan element which identifies the financial plan for implementing all capital improvements in Auburn. Transportation improvements are included in the Capital Facilities Plan, which is amended annually. The Capital Facilities Plan enables the City to fulfill the GMA requirement of having a multiyear financing plan based on identified transportation needs. It also enables the City to make informed decisions about its investment of public dollars and make timely decisions about maintaining levels-of-service in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan standards. The 2016- 2035 Transportation Plan capacity projects are forecast to cost approximately $196 million. The revenue sources proposed to be used by the City of Auburn for these transportation improvements are described below. Forecasts are based on current funding levels for City funds and based on past trends for grants and partnerships. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 93 6.2 FUNDING SOURCES The City uses a combination of public and private funding sources to implement transportation improvements in Auburn, both for maintenance activities and capital improvements. GENERAL TAX REVENUES The City receives tax revenues from a variety of state, regional, and local sources including the real estate excise tax (REET), sales tax, and the motor vehicle fuel tax (MVFT). Despite these revenues, the City has numerous maintenance and capital improvement needs that cannot be met by existing tax revenues alone. Recognizing the need to raise additional revenues for the local street system, Auburn residents approved the ‘Save Our Streets’ (SOS) program in 2004 for specific funding from property taxes, and in doing so, created a funding program to help rehabilitate Auburn’s residential streets. In 2013, the City Council modified the funding source for the program to be from Construction Sales Tax instead of property taxes. In 2018, City Council modified the funds for this program, which are currently provided by Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) for 2019 and 2020. With the success of the ‘Save Our Streets’ program, the City intends to pursue a program that will help fund arterial and collector street maintenance. The City has an Arterial Street Fund; however, these funds have proven inadequate in addressing all the maintenance and capital needs of the arterial system. In addition, the City has also created an Arterial Street Preservation Program to preserve and rehabilitate the pavement on these classes of streets. The program is funded through a one percent utility tax which was adopted by City Council during 2008. 2016 – 2035 Forecast: REET: $6,000,000 Sales Tax: $32,000,000 (Local Roads Fund) MVFT: $10,700,000 Utility Tax: $40,000,000 (Arterial Roads Fund) GRANTS The City has an active grant program and continually seeks grants, both private and public, to improve Auburn’s transportation system. The following is a list of some of the grants the City has historically applied for and will likely apply for again in the future. FEDERALLY FUNDED PROGRAMS The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) replaced the Transportation Enhancement (TE) Activities with the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP). The original TE activities remain eligible for TE funds that were previously apportioned until the TE funds are obligated, rescinded, or lapse. MAP-21 funds projects designed to strengthen the cultural, aesthetic, and 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 94 environmental aspects of the inter-modal transportation system. The program provides for the implementation of a variety of non-traditional projects, including the restoration of historic transportation facilities, the construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities, landscaping and scenic beautification, and the mitigation of water pollution from highway runoff. The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides flexible funding that may be used by states and localities for projects on any public road, non-motorized improvements, bridge projects, and transit capital projects. The Safety Program is a federal program targeted at reducing accident rates at intersections and along corridors, particularly at those locations with higher than average fatality and injury rates. Funds come from the Highway Safety Improvement (HSIP) Program included in MAP-21. HSIP requires that states program and spend safety funds according to their Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Washington State's plan is called Target Zero. The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program is a federally funded program administered through PSRC. CMAQ funds projects and programs in air quality non-attainment and maintenance areas, which reduce transportation related emissions. In addition to the aforementioned programs, the federal government has an annual appropriations bill. Auburn may apply through the offices of Washington senators and congressional members for funding for specific projects. This funding source has historically been a successful means of financing some of the City’s more expensive capital improvement projects. FEDERAL LEGISLATION In 2018, the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development, or BUILD Transportation Discretionary Grant program, replaced the TIGER Grant program which was established in 2009. This program provides a unique opportunity for the DOT to invest in road, rail, transit and port projects that promise to achieve national objectives. Previously known as Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery, or TIGER Discretionary Grants, Congress has dedicated nearly $7.1 billion for ten rounds of National Infrastructure Investments to fund projects that have a significant local or regional impact. The 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act also dedicates funding to numerous programs, many of which can be used to help finance the City’s programmed transportation improvement projects. STATE FUNDED PROGRAMS The Safe Routes to Schools Program is a state and federally funded program that aims to protect children from traffic related deaths and injuries and promotes a healthy lifestyle by encouraging bicycling and walking to school. The Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Grant is a state funded program that funds non-motorized safety improvements. The Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) administers annual grant programs that fund roadway and non-motorized projects that improve safety, mobility, capacity, and promote economic development. The TIB offers several programs, each of which emphasizes different funding criteria. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 95 The Community Economic Revitalization Board (CERB) is a state funded program that provides low-cost financing for public facility improvements. Public entities are eligible to apply for and receive loans and grants for public facilities linked to economic development outcomes such as private business investment and job creation. CERB also finances site-specific studies and plans. 2016-2035 Forecast: Federal Grants: $60,000,000 State Grants: $30,000,000 LOANS Low-interest loans are also available to municipalities. For example the Washington State Department of Commerce Public Works Board offers low-interest loans (PWTF) for local governments to finance public infrastructure construction and rehabilitation. Eligible projects must improve public health and safety, respond to environmental issues, promote economic development, or upgrade system performance. Roads, streets and bridges are eligible for these loans. The loans can be strategically employed to leverage grant funding by providing a local match, enabling the City to compete for funding for public infrastructure projects. In addition, the City has the option of issuing bonds for public infrastructure projects. 2016-2035 Forecast: PWTFL: No PWTF loans are included in the forecast. PRIVATE SECTOR CONTRIBUTIONS The City has an established traffic impact fee system based on the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) guidelines, as amended by the City Council. The fee system estimates the amount of traffic each development is anticipated to create, based on the land use type and size. Traffic impact fees compensate the City for the capacity improvements needed to accommodate the new trips generated by new development. In turn, the City uses the revenues to expand the street network through the capacity projects included in the TIP. The fees are based on the costs of the capacity project included in the TIP and forecast growth throughout the City. The fees are updated annually following the adoption of the TIP by City Council. Payment of the impact fee does not relieve developers of their codified obligation to construct half-street improvements, nor the need to mitigate project impacts identified through the SEPA process, which may include the construction of an identified TIP project (and a credit for the impact fee contribution towards that project). The City also charges a truck impact fee for certain land-use types which are associated with significant truck traffic generation, such as commercial and industrial uses. These fees are used to address impacts on the City’s truck routes and other truck-related infrastructure. 2016-2035 Forecast: Traffic Impact Fees: $20,000,000 Development Improvements: $15,000,000 FUNDING PARTNERSHIPS 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 96 The City has successfully formed several funding partnerships, which have enabled it to leverage its resources in implementing transportation improvements. MUCKLESHOOT INDIAN TRIBE (MIT) The City anticipates continuing to partner with MIT on funding projects of mutual benefit throughout the City. A recent partnership project is Auburn Way South (Dogwood to Hemlock). The City expects MIT to be a major funding partner on the Auburn Way South Bypass project and also to participate in the remainder of the (SR-SR 164) Auburn Way South Corridor improvement projects. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (WSDOT) The City anticipates continuing to partner with WSDOT on funding projects involving the State Routes through the City. Recent appropriations by the state legislature budgeted $15 million for the Auburn Way South Bypass project for the Eastbound Off-Ramp. LOCAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS Local Improvement Districts (LID) enable city investment in a specified area by leveraging city funds, when available, with contributions from property owners in the district. In essence, LID’s are a means of using limited city resources to improve neighborhood quality through improvement of streets, sidewalks, and other features of the roadway. FAST (FREIGHT ACTION STRATEGY TEAM) FAST is an innovative partnership composed of transportation agencies, ports, cities, economic development organizations, trucking, rail, and business interests. One of FAST’s primary objectives is to obtain funding for projects that improve freight mobility. FAST helped fund the S 277th Street Grade Separation, the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation, and the M Street Underpass project. FMSIB (FREIGHT MOBILITY STRATEGIC INVESTMENT BOARD) The mission of the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB) is to create a comprehensive and coordinated state program to facilitate freight movement to local, national, and international markets. FMSIB is also charged with lessening the impact of freight movements on local communities. FMSIB obtains funding directly from legislative appropriations and has contributed funds to the 3rd Street SW Grade Separation, the S 277th Street Grade Separation and the M Street Underpass projects. 2016-2035 Forecast: MIT: $15,000,000 WSDOT: $20,000,000 LID: No LID funds are included in the forecast. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 97 FAST: No future FAST funding is included in the forecast. FMSIB: No FMSIB funds are included in the forecast. FUTURE FINANCING POSSIBILITIES As the transportation system evolves, so will the range of financing options available to the City. In general, the financing options currently available under state law fall short of meeting current and anticipated transportation improvement needs. Hence, the City will continue to seek fair and sustainable strategies for funding the maintenance activities and capital improvements needed to preserve the City’s transportation network. Among other strategies, the implementation of a street utility may be employed to fund many of the City’s transportation needs. TRANSPORTATION BENEFIT DISTRICT In 1987, the State Legislature created Transportation Benefit Districts (TBDs) as an option for local governments to fund transportation improvements. Chapter 36.73 of the Revised Code of Washington provides for the establishment of TBD by cities and counties to levy and impose various taxes and fees to generate revenues to support transportation improvements within the district. A TBD is a quasi-municipal corporation and independent taxing district created for the sole purpose of acquiring, constructing, improving, providing, and funding transportation improvements within the district. In 2005 and 2007, the Legislature amended the TBD statute to expand its uses and revenue authority, including the ability to authorize a $20 annual vehicle license fee (VLF), and up to an additional $80 of VLF, if approved by voters within the district. The state legislature provided local governments with these tools because inflation has eroded the local share of gas tax and a series of statewide b allot initiatives passed over the last 12 years have eliminated other traditional sources of funding for local transportation needs. The City of Auburn created a TBD in 2011. The TBD is currently considering the implementation of the $20 annual vehicle fee, possible local sales tax increase and how the revenue raised could be best used to achieve the goals of the TBD. 2016-2035 Forecast: (If Authorized) TBD: $16,000,000 STREET UTILITY A street utility would be used similarly to how sewer and water utility fees are now collected. A monthly or annual fee would be charged to residents and businesses in Auburn, for example via a flat fee or through a pro-rated fee based on anticipated usage. The implementation of a street utility would require a change in state law. The street utility system is one in which all residents and businesses would pay their fair share of funding street maintenance and 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 98 repair. If implemented, a street utility would undoubtedly be combined with the suite of other financing strategies the City currently employs. 2016-2035 Forecast: (If Authorized) Street Utility: $5-9 Million per year 6.3 REVENUE SHORTFALL CONTINGENCY Revenue forecasts for City funds are considered to be relatively secured. Other revenue such as grants and partnership funding can be slightly more unpredictable. While all the revenue currently forecast above does fully fund the transportation plan improvements, if shortfalls arise the City will have to take one or more of the following actions to maintain compliance with GMA concurrency requirements;  Supplant the projected budget shortfall with other existing City funds.  Enact new sources of revenue.  Revise Land Use Plan to reduce development capacity and resultant need for additional transportation improvements.  Lower the LOS Standard sufficiently to reduce the need for additional transportation improvements.  Impose restriction (moratorium) on further development with impacts to areas not meeting LOS standards until current LOS standard is met. 6.4 FUNDING STRATEGIES, PROJECT PRIORITIZATION The City uses a variety of criteria to prioritize transportation projects, including safety, mobility, and overall community benefit. In addition, the City also considers the availability of funding and the ability to leverage City dollars to raise addition funds. For example, grants are often available for specific types of capital investments, whereas they are more limited for maintenance/preservation. Hence, the City often needs to budget for maintenance/preservation through tax revenues. Capital improvements may be financially secured through a combination of public and private investment. Hence, project prioritization for capital improvements is often partially dependent on the ability to secure outside funding. Likewise, maintenance and preservation is highly dependent on the limited tax revenues available to the City. In the future, the City will need to continue lobbying for its share of federal, state, and county tax revenues, seek creative avenues for securing private investment dollars and grant funds, and potentially implement new funding strategies such as tolling and street utility fees. 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 99 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 100 CHAPTER 7 – MONITORING AND EVALUATION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan, a long- range plan with the horizon year 2035, predicts the needs and conditions of the future transportation system, enabling the City to anticipate its future needs. Nonetheless, the transportation network is dynamic, constantly evolving due to circumstances beyond the scope and influence of this plan. Hence, regular updates are necessary to ensure the Plan remains current and relevant. 7.1 ANNUAL UPDATES The Comprehensive Transportation Plan can be amended annually as part of the City’s regular Comprehensive Plan amendment cycle, which ensures proposed changes go through a public review process before the amended plan is adopted by the City Council at the end of the calendar year. In preparation for the annual amendment cycle, the City will review the plan and propose updates as needed. These proposed updates may be due to changes to City priorities, the availability of new information, or the relevance of certain plan components. RE-EVALUATION The annual re-evaluation process provides an opportunity for the City to identify progress made in implementing the Plan, as well as identify new needs that have arisen since the previous update. The update will consider the street, non-motorized and transit systems, and assess whether the Plan adequately addresses the implementation strategies necessary to ensure the transportation infrastructure continues to grow in line with the City’s objectives. As part of this process, the City will review its future projects list and update the Transportation Improvement Program and the Capital Facilities Plan as appropriate. It will also review and update the Policies and Funding chapters, in order to remain consistent with the City’s vision and current with potential funding strategies. TECHNICAL INFORMATION The Comprehensive Transportation Plan contains a range of technical data, much of which informs other elements of the Plan. As part of the annual amendment cycle, technical information, such as traffic volumes, existing levels-of-service, roadway classifications, and transit route and ridership information will be updated as appropriate. Updated information will inform much of the evaluation process, enabling the City to quantify system changes over time and make appropriate decisions in planning the future system. MODEL UPDATES The City’s traffic model shall be updated on a regular basis, every few years, as new land use, employment, and housing data becomes available. Model updates are important as they 2020 Comprehensive Transportation Plan - Page 101 ensure the City has an accurate understanding of how land use patterns, empl oyment, and other factors impact future transportation conditions, enabling the City Council to make informed policy decisions. The model also provides an understanding of the impacts associated with different projects, allowing the City to devise a revised list of future projects to improve capacity and safety, as well as achieve other priorities. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY The annual evaluation process is an opportunity to ensure the Comprehensive Transportation Plan is consistent with other elements of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, including the land-use element, economic development element, Auburn Parks, Recreation and Open Space Plan, Transportation Improvement Program, and Capital Facilities Plan. Hence, as part of the annual amendment cycle, the City will ensure these plan components are consistent with and supportive of each other. 7.2 MULTI-YEAR UPDATES The City has the opportunity to preform annual updates to the Comprehensive Transportation Plan on an as needed basis to account for significant changes which have occurred during the previous year. A more exhaustive process is periodically necessary, hence, a thorough rewrite of the Plan shall be conducted every five to eight years. This endeavor will include a broad public outreach effort with input from neighboring jurisdictions, state and regional agencies, and Auburn residents and businesses. Much like the process for the 2015 update, it will present an opportunity to holistically examine the current transportation system and lay the framew ork for development of the future system. City of Auburn APPENDIX A Comprehensive Transportation Plan Project List The table below lists transportation projects that address current and anticipated transportation needs through the 2035 horizon year. The list excludes projects planned to be underway within the next 6 years that are included in the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). Number Name Description Purpose/Need Estimated Cost (2020) Comp-1 M Street SE Corridor with signal at 12th St SE Corridor and Intersection Improvements Widen M St to construct multi-lane arterial, including a new traffic signal at 12th St SE. Capacity, Safety, LOS: This project will improve mobility and contributes to the completion of a north/north arterial corridor. Combines projects listed as (16) and (22) in the 2022 analysis. $7.3M Comp-2 104th Avenue SE/8th Street NE Intersection & Corridor Improvements Construct multi-lane roundabout to replace the signalized intersection, re-align the curved section of Lea Hill Road, widen sidewalks on the 8th Street bridge, Potential access management on 8th Street NE and intersection improvements at Pike Street NE Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Project identified in Lea Hill Road Corridor Study (2020). $4.0M Comp-3 116th Avenue SE/SE 312th Street Intersection and Corridor Improvements Construct a single-lane, roundabout at the intersection of 116th Avenue SE, pedestrian crossings with flashing beacons at key crossings, and complete gaps in sidewalks and bicycle lanes between 116th Avenue SE and 124th Avenue SE. Portions of this project may be completed as frontage improvements by developers of adjacent properties. Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Project identified in Lea Hill Road Corridor Study (2020). $5.6M Comp-4 Lea Hill Road Widening Capacity Improvements Construct shared use path along the east side and a bike lane on the west side of Lea Hill Road between 112th Avenue Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Project identified in Lea Hill Road Corridor Study (2020). $9.5M SE and 106th Place SE, left-turn pocket at the Lea Hill Condominiums, pedestrian crossings with flashing beacons bus stops, and a soldier-pile retaining wall on the downhill side of Lea Hill Road as needed to accommodate roadway widening and stabilize the hillside. Comp-5 M Street SE/29th Street SE Intersection Improvements Construct single lane roundabout. Capacity, Safety: Project identified in R Street SE Corridor Study (2019). Listed as project (23) 2022 analysis as a new traffic signal. $1.0M Comp-6 R Street Bypass Capacity Improvements Construct a new arterial connection between M St SE and Auburn Black- Diamond Rd, parallel to the Stampede Pass rail line and potentially remove at-grade railroad crossing that connects Black Diamond Road to R Street SE. Capacity, Safety, Non- Motorized: This project was identified in the 2002 M Street SE Grade Separation Pre-Design Study and was originally planned to be implemented with the grade separation that has since been completed. The new connection would keep freight and commuter traffic off of R Street, a residential collector street and provide a connection between SR18 and SR164 via M Street SE. This would reduce congestion at the intersection of R Street NE/8th Street SE and address other capacity and safety issues. Listed as project(30) in the 2035 analysis. $8.0M Comp-7* 116th Avenue SE/SE 320th Street Intersection Improvements Construct single lane roundabout. Capacity, Safety: The project would provide traffic calming and improved intersection control. This is a portion of a project (11) listed in the 2022 analysis. $2.0M Comp-8* C Street SW/15th Street SW Intersection Improvements Construct a southbound right-turn pocket, re- channelize the intersection to provide two southbound through lanes, and replace the existing spanwire traffic signal with a new traffic signal. Capacity, Safety $1.2M Comp-9* 124th Avenue SE/SE 320th Street Intersection Improvements Replace traffic signal with roundabout Capacity, Safety: This project was identified to be needed to support the on- going expansion of Green River College. Listed as project (32) was in the 2035 analysis. $2.5M Comp- 10* 124th Avenue SE/SE 284th Street Intersection Improvements Construct northbound left-turn lane on 124th Ave SE Capacity, Safety: Project need identified using crash history prior to 2015. Listed as a project (24) in the 2022 analysis. $1M Comp- 11* 15th Street SW Preservation Improvements Re-construction of the roadway from West Valley Highway to C Street SW with potential safety improvements at the Union Pacific at grade rail and Interurban Trail crossings Preservation, Safety. $10M Comp- 12* Auburn Way Corridor Improvements Construct pedestrian accessibility and aesthetic enhancements on Auburn Way between 4th St NE and 4th St SE, including curb-bulbs at Economic Development, Non-motorized. $4.5M intersections adjacent to on-street parking, a new northbound left-turn at 3rd St SE, and signal and channelization improvements at E Main St. Comp- 13* SE 320th St Corridor Improvements Construct non-motorized and safety improvements including bicycle lanes, sidewalks, and street lighting between 122nd Ave SE and 116th Ave SE. Safety, Non-motorized: SE 320th is a primary route serving Green River College and adjacent neighborhoods. There are high volumes of pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit utilizing the corridor. Listed as project (11) in the 2022 analysis. $4.0M Comp- 14* West Valley Highway Corridor Improvements Rehabilitate and widen pavement from 15th Street NW to W Main Street, re-channelize to add bicycle lanes, pedestrian facilities, roadway lighting, ITS, and required storm system improvements. Preservation, Non- Motorized. This road segment is a popular bike corridor which is also on the annual Seattle-to- Portland bike race route. Listed as project (13) in the 2022 analysis. $4.0M Comp- 15* Auburn Way S Corridor Improvements Construct improved pedestrian linkages, new and repaired sidewalks, undergrounding utilities, new street lighting, trash and recycling receptacles, and other appropriate amenities from SR-18 interchange to M Street SE. Economic Development: This project will revitalize and beautify Auburn Way S. $4.5M Comp-16 SE 304th Street/112th Avenue SE Intersection Improvements Construct a new traffic signal, northbound left turn lane on 112th Ave SE, and sidewalks/bike lanes on both sides of SE304th Street. Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Listed as project (31) in the 2035 analysis. $1.5M Comp-17 SE 284th / SE 288th St New roadway This project will construct a new collector linking 284th St at 124th Ave to 288th St at 132nd Ave. The roadway will Network Capacity and Non- motorized. Listed as project (34) in the 2035 analysis. $9M have one lane in each direction, and include a bike lane and sidewalks on each side. Comp-18 D St NW New Roadway This project will construct a new 4 lane arterial from 37th St NW to 44th St NW, including bike lanes and sidewalks on each side. Network Capacity and Non- Motorized. Listed as project (36) in the 2035 analysis. $7M Comp-19 37th Street SE Safe Routes to Schools Construct sidewalks along 37th Street SE from M Street SE to Olympic to Olympic Street SE and enhanced pedestrian crossings along 37th Street SE between M Street SE and D Street SE. Non-motorized: This project would complete a gap in the sidewalk network and provide connections to/from Gildo Ray Elementary, Mt. Baker Middle School, the 37th Street trail to R Street SE and transit stops on 37th Street SE and M Street SE. TBD Comp-20 112th Ave SE & 105th Place SE Intersection Improvements Reconfigure 105th Place SE to be right in /right out. Construct a single lane roundabout with sidewalks and bike lanes on SE 312th Street. Construct a single lane roundabout with sidewalks and bike lanes on SE 312th Street. $5M Comp-21 51st Ave S/S 296th St Intersection Improvements Construct a protected southbound left turn lane on 51st Avenue S, bike lanes, and sidewalks on all legs of the intersection. Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized. Listed as project (35) in the 2035 analysis. $1.6M Comp-22 BNSF Yard Grade Separation This project will construct a road across the BNSF yard This project would provide a grade separated arterial connection over the BNSF rail yard that would provide connectivity to/from the yard to SR 18 and SR 167. The project would be needed if/when the BNSF Yard converts to a multi- modal facility. TBD Comp-23 East Auburn Access Project New Roadway Construct a new arterial connection from SR-18 to SR-164 that connects to SR-164 between MIT Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Previously referred to as Auburn Bypass, a draft Bypass Feasibility Report TBD. Muckleshoot Indian Tribe project, $15M Plaza and Riverwalk Drive. was prepared in partnership with WSDOT, City of Auburn, Muckleshoot Indian Tribe, and other regional partners in 2009. awarded by Connecting Washington Program in 2015. Comp-24 I St NE Corridor New Roadway Construct a new roadway connection from 45th St NE to S 277th St. Network Capacity. Listed as project (2) in the 2022 analysis. TBD Developer led project. Comp-25 R Street SE Extension New Roadway Construct a new roadway connection between 17th St SE and Auburn Black-Diamond Road Capacity, Safety, Non- motorized: Reduce congestion on Auburn Way South and M Street SE. TBD Potential Muckleshoot Indian Tribe project. * Project was removed from the TIP in 2020 and placed back into the comprehensive plan because there is still a current or future need for the project but funding was anticipated to not be available for the project within the 6-year TIP period City of Auburn APPENDIX B Comprehensive Transportation Plan Maps PART 1 – PROPOSED EDITS 18 18 167 167 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST K E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE SSE 320TH ST 56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SED ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE T ST SE57THPLSM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES 305TH ST U ST NWAuburn Ave130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E S E 3 1 8 T H W A Y 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE AST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 72ND ST SE 42ND ST NE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SE51ST AVE ST H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4609Printed On: 10/18/2019 0 1 Miles City of Auburn Highway Principal Arterial Future Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Future Minor Arterial Residential Collector Future Residential Collector Non Residential Collector Future Non Resident Collector Rustic Collector Local Private Functional Roadway Classification Map 2-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Add dotted blue line Change to orange Local road section (gray) is changed to Minor Arterial (red) The future extension of I Street should align with the existing I Street 118th should be shown as a residential collector to the connection to the Bridges This little tail is private Make sure the data on this map is coming directly from the roadway classifications indicated w/the roadway segments in GIS. Add A St. Loop .-21 , 7 0 0.-13,300.-32,30 0 .-4,800.-10,400.-6,800.-5,600.-28,200.-2,000.-8,900.-10,200.-13,600.-7,700.-23,100.-22,200.-1 7 , 6 0 0 .-4,400.-8,300.-7,400.-5,600 .-3,700.-3 5 , 9 0 0 .-6,200 .-10,700 .-8,800.-7,300.-5,300.-6,000 .-31,000 .-23,000.-1,200 .-8,500 .-4,100.-16,100.-5,400 .-2,700.-16,900 .-3,400 .-9,700.-17,800.-11,100 .-12,500.-9,400.-21,800.-4,600 .-25,400.-1 6 , 6 0 0 .-28,900 .-6,400.-4,900.-9,300.-3,200.-4,300 .-22,500 .-1,600.-18,400.-8,200.-7,900.-8,6 0 0 .-17,200 .-8,100.-18,100.-24,000 .-24,800.-16,700 .-21,900 .-6,500 .-18,000.-1,700.-15,300 .-900.-7,100.-4,600 .-7,700 .-21,700.-21,900 .-6,200.-4,100 .-5,300 .-8,300 .-10 , 2 0 0 .-4,400 .-4,600 .-4,400.-10,400.-2,700 .-7,400.-3,700 .-4,800 .-13,600.-21,800.-1,600TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEA U B U R N W A Y SB ST NWC ST SWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURNWAYNR ST SE124TH AVE SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST LAKETAPPS P K W Y S E 4 1 STST S E 29TH ST SE51ST AVE SK E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW 25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE104THAVESEI ST NWSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWS 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE3 2 1ST ST S 118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST112THAVESE ACADEMYDRSEPEASLEYCANYONR D S 4TH ST NE EAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 7 TH ST SE 6 7 T H S T SEL ST SET ST SEM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEG ST SEFOSTER AVE SESE 310TH ST 47TH ST S ERIVERDRSE57THPLSSE290THST 130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 6 4 T H S T S E50THSTSEV ST NWAST E 21ST ST N E 108TH AVESE31ST ST SE 22ND ST SEE ST NES 292ND ST SE 282ND ST D ST SWV ST SESE 286TH ST42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SES 303RD PL K ST NES 324TH ST 43RD ST NE SE 293RD ST A ST SE108THAVESE64TH ST SE 104TH AVE SED ST SET H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4592Printed On: 10/6/2015 °0 1 Miles Parks City of Auburn 100-999 1,000-9,999 10,000+ Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2013) Map 2-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Edit to show ADT based on data collected in 2019 TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 S T ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZR D S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T H STSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn Ave130TH AVE SE35THWAYSER ST NW26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E SE 301ST ST 36THSTSE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4681Printed On: 10/18/2019 °0 1 Miles Truck Routes Map 2-3 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Priority 2 WSDOT Parks City of Auburn Priority 1 Current Local Truck Routes Future Local Truck Route Current Through Truck Route Future Through Truck Route Current Local Truck Route Future Local Truck Route Make sure the data on this map is coming directly from the roadway classifications indicated w/the roadway segments in GIS. TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEA U B U R N W A Y SB ST NWC ST SWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW LAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1 STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 51ST AVE SK E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NWWESTVALLEYHWYSSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SED ST NE112TH AVE SEPEASLEYCANYONR D S K ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE M ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES 305TH ST57TH PLSSE290TH ST 130TH AVE SE35 T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SEV ST NWAST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST S E 295TH ST SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 2ND ST SE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL S 324TH ST 65TH ST SEA ST SET H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4588Printed On: 10/6/2015 °0 1 Miles City of Auburn T1 (Over 10,000) T2 (4,000 - 10,000) T3 (300 - 4,000) T4 (100 - 300) T5 (Over 20 in 60 Days) Freight Routes Classification MapClass T-1 to T-5Annual Tons (in thousands) Map 2-4 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Edit to show freight class based on data collected in 2019 and map layers generated by WSDOT ")10")4 ")16")18")1")13")11 ")35")17 ")19 ")27 ")26")9 ")12 ")8 ")14")25 ")15 ")3 ")23")5 ")22")6")2")33 ")31 TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY N124TH AVE SER ST SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW LAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 51ST AVE SK E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW ORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NWSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWO ST NE37TH ST NE S 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST 321ST ST S AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SED ST NE112TH AVE SEACADEMYDRSEK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 7TH ST SE 6 7 T H S T SELSTSEC ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE52ND AVE S47TH ST S E 56TH ST SE57THPLSSE 290TH ST 130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEBSTNE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH S T N E 6 4 T H S T S EV ST NWAST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE31ST ST SE 22ND ST SEE ST NE42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST S E 295TH ST 5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST V CT SE72ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 2ND ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 307TH PL K ST NE5 7 T H D R S E S 324TH ST F ST NE56THAVE S 64TH ST SE SE 282ND ST OSTNERSTSEA ST SEM U C K L E S H O O T M U C K L E S H O O T C A S I N O C A S I N O T H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4603Printed On: 10/8/2015 °0 1 Miles Corridor Sections City of Auburn Auburn LOS Corridors Map 2-5 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department NO CHANGE È !o 25 3 5131819 14 8 21610209412 1 1117 15 7 226923242627383729 34 3 3630 33 323562 16312 TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 C ST SWSTUCK RIVER DR S EB ST NW41ST S T S EC ST NWEAST BLVDI ST NWAUBU R N W A Y S A ST SES 287TH ST 118TH AVE SE51ST AVE SCLAY ST NWA ST NWD ST NE2ND ST E 144THAVESEKERSE Y WA Y S EPEASLEYCANYON RD S JOHNREDDINGTONRDNE124TH AVE SEH ST SEG ST SE140TH AVE SEFOSTER AVE SEM ST SE47TH ST S E56TH AVE SUSTNW55TH AVE SORAVETZ RD SEEMERALD DOWNS DR NW321ST ST S ACADEMYDRSE S 277TH ST 15TH ST SW SE 301ST ST S E 2 8 7THST HICRESTDRNW I ST NEV ST NWL ST SEAST E 21ST ST NE S 318TH ST 25TH ST SEH ST NEL A KE TAPPSPKWY SEE ST NEPIKE ST NW36 T H S T S E AUBURN-BLACK DIAMOND RDSER ST SE42ND ST NW 8TH ST N E 16TH ST NE 4TH ST SW SE 282ND ST SE 312TH ST D ST SESE 288TH ST108THAVESE SE 326TH PLSE 295TH ST 20TH ST SE 5 1 S T S T S E 42ND ST NE C ST SESE 304TH ST Z ST SEO ST SW56TH ST SE 37TH ST NE L ST NESKYWAY L N S E PEARL AVE SE4TH ST NE 112TH AVE SE6TH ST SE S 302ND PL S 324TH ST F ST NWG PL SEV CT SEAUBURN WA Y SB ST NWASTSEK ERSEYWAY SE A ST SER ST SELAKETAP P S P K W Y S EI ST NE51ST AVE SSE 312TH ST S 277TH ST T H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4682Printed On: 10/26/2015 °0 1 Miles 2022 City Improvements 2035 City Improvements Not in Analysis City of Auburn Transportation Improvement Projects Map 2-6 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department REMOVE 18 18 167 167 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST K E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE SSE 320TH ST 56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SED ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE T ST SE57THPLSM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES 305TH ST U ST NWAuburn Ave130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E S E 3 1 8 T H W A Y 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE AST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 72ND ST SE 42ND ST NE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SE51ST AVE ST H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4589Printed On: 10/24/2019 0 1 Miles City of Auburn Future Variable Message Existing Variable Message City Signal PED Signal County Signal WSDOT ITS Copper ITS Fiber Future ITS Corridor Intelligent Transportation Systems Map 2-7 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department This is Moving West V In Construction In Construction Segments marked in construction must be shown as existing, as completion is planned in 2020. Stops at S 287th St In Construction V Move to other side, In Construction ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 TS18 TS18 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZRD S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T HSTSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn AveSE290THST 35THWAYSER ST NW130TH AVE SE26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108THAV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST SE295THST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SE51ST AVE SA ST SEMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO TS167 TS167 THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4587Printed On: 9/23/2019 °0 1 Miles Priority Future Pedestrian Corridor Existing Sidewalks 5 Education Facilities 1/4 Mile from School 1/2 Mile from School Recently Completed ^_Protected Crosswalks Existing Sidewalks and Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors Map 3-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department change to blue Change to blue Add blue line remove these layers - Show DUC - Show schools with larger icons - Show street base layer (as in other maps) Add school icon change legend to "existing" add school icon EDITS PART 1/2 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 TS18 TS18 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE WMAINST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 S T ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZR D S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SED ST NW110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWS 277TH ST SCE NICD RSES 287TH ST CLAY ST NW112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE S4TH ST NE K ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T H STSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST 130TH AVE SE35THWAYSER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THSTSE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL118TH AVE SE65TH ST SE51ST AVE SA ST SEMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO TS167 TS167 THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4587Printed On: 8/3/2020 °0 1 Miles 5 Education Facilities Priority Future Pedestrian Corridor Existing DUC Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors Map 3-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department new school One side existing both sides existing Remove purple Remove Remove label hemlock Remove remove remove Existing trail - Add existing trails that connect roads (not the small isolated ones within the parks) and replace "sidewalk" layers by trails when a trail is existing. - Label street names where a pedestrian facility is existing or planned. - change to 3 colors to show existing on one side, existing on both sides, or no sidewalk Downtown Urban Center (DUC) Zone new school add to future ped corridor -Remove crossed out section (outside city limits) -Light green from S 304th to S. 300th Pl - dark green from S. 300th to S 298th - light green from S. 298th to S. 296th - pink from 296th to 292nd - light green from 202nd to 288th Existing trail Existing trail EDITS PART 2/2 TS18 TS18 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 S T ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZR D S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T H STSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn Ave130TH AVE SE35THWAYSER ST NW26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E SE 301ST ST 36THSTSE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO TS167 TS167 THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4604Printed On: 10/14/2019 °0 1 Miles Existing Trailheads Future Trailheads Bike Facility Future Bike Facility Trail Future Trail Existing and Future Bicycle Facilities and Multi-Use Trails Map 3-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department show connection berween these roadways. Complete Complete Future non-motorized facility - dashed brown line for west side of A St SE from 6th to 41st Ex. Trailhead Ex trail head. Ex Trailhead Complete 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 INTERURBAN TRAILMAIN ST CONNECTORA/B STREET CORRIDOR124TH AVE SE CORRIDORGREEN RIVER ROAD CORRIDORLEA HILL CONNECTOR STEWART/LAKE TAPPS CONNECTORSOUTH AUBURN M STREET SE CORRIDORWEST VALLEY CORRIDORA ST SE AND LAKELAND H ILLS CORR IDOR NORTH 37TH ST NW AND WEST HILL CONNECTOR NORTH AUBURN R STREET NE / I STREET NE CORRIDORRIV E R W A L K - A U B U R N W A Y S - E N U M C L A W C O N N E C T O R KE R S E Y W A Y / L A K E T A P P S C O R R I D O RC STREET TRAIL AND 15TH ST SW CORRIDORTS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEA U B U RNWAYSB ST NWC ST SWISTNEM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW LAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 51ST AVE SKERSEY W AY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE ORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104TH AVE SEI ST NWWESTVALLEYHWYSSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWOSTNE37TH ST NE S 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SED ST NE112TH AVE SEACADEMYDRSEPEASLEYCANYONR D S EAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE C ST SEM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SE S 305TH ST57TH PLS130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NWBSTNESE 323RD PL 17TH ST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SEV ST NW21ST S T N E 108TH AVESE23R D ST S E 36 T H S T S E 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST O ST SE5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST 72ND ST SE 2ND ST SE PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL J ST NEK ST NE5 7 T H D R S E S 324TH ST FIR ST SE43RD ST NE A ST SEM U C K L E S H O O T M U C K L E S H O O T C A S I N O C A S I N OT H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N K E N T K E N T P I E R C E P I E R C E C O U N T Y C O U N T Y K I N G K I N G C O U N T Y C O U N T Y PA C I F I C PA C I F I C S U M N E R S U M N E R E D G E W O O D E D G E W O O D A L G O N A A L G O N A F S T R E E T / L E S G O V E C O R R I D O R AUB U R N B L A C K D I A M O N D / G R E E N V A L L E Y R O A D C O N N E C T O RDownhillB.P.A Powerline Right of Way B.P.A Powerline Right of Way B.P.A Po w erli n e Rig ht of W ay VALENTINEToToF l a m i n g F l a m i n g G e y s e r G e y s e r @ EMERALDDOWNS AUBURNDOWNTOWN SUPERMALL YMCA LES GOVE H i l l AUBURNGOLFCOURSEBRANNAN PARK MARYOLSONPARK LAKELAND HILLSCOMMERCIALAREA Only ToToK e n t K e n t@ ToToK e n t K e n t@ ToToK e n t K e n t@ @ ToToK e n t K e n t&&S e a t t l e S e a t t l e@ @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToE d g e w o o d E d g e w o o d @ToToM i l t o n M i l t o n @To To Ta c o m a Ta c o m a @ToToS u m n e r S u m n e r&&P u y a l l u p P u y a l l u p @ToToS u m n e r S u m n e r&&B o n n e y B o n n e yL a k e L a k e @ToToB o n n e y B o n n e yL a k e L a k e @ ToToE n u m c l a w E n u m c l a w ToToB l a c k B l a c kD i a m o n d D i a m o n d @ ToToP a c i f i c P a c i f i cR a c e w a y s R a c e w a y s @ GRCC GAMEFARMPARK MUCKLESHOOTCASINO PACIFICRACEWAYS INTERURBAN TRAILINTERURBAN TRAILToToK e n t K e n t@ RecommendedUphill Route AUBURNENVIRONMENTALPARK Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4593Printed On: 10/6/2015 °0 1 Miles Connectors Corridors Interurban Trail City of Auburn Bicycle Corridors and Connectors Map 3-3 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Focus Area NO CHANGE ^_ TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 MUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZRD S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T HSTSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn Ave35THWAYSER ST NW130TH AVE SE26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH A V ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 21ST ST SE 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SAuburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4510Printed On: 10/14/2019 °0 1 Miles ^_Auburn Transit Station Park & Ride Metro Transit Routes Pierce Transit Routes Sound Transit Routes Muckleshoot Shuttle Routes Auburn Transit Routes and Transit Dependent Areas Map 4-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")164 ")181 ")181 ")910 ")180 ")952 ")566 ")566 ")578")181 ")917 ")180 ")497 ")917 ")578 ")497 ")186/915 ")910 ")MIT Shuttle Remove Rt 910 Edit Rt 180 Edit Rt 917 Rt 186/915 becomes 915 only (Will send data separately) ^_ TS18 TS18 MUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZRD S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T HSTSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn Ave35THWAYSER ST NW130TH AVE SE26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108THAV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 21ST ST SE 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SAuburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4684Printed On: 10/14/2019 °0 1 Miles ^_Auburn Transit Station Park & Ride Transit Dependent Areas Metro Transit Routes Pierce Transit Routes Sound Transit Routes Muckleshoot Shuttle Routes Auburn Transit Routes and Transit Dependent Areas Map 4-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")164 ")181 ")181 ")910 ")180 ")952 ")566 ")566 ")578")181 ")917 ")180 ")497 ")917 ")578 ")497 ")186/915 ")910 ")MIT Shuttle Edit to match new Metro route numbers and alignment based on RKAAMP, which begin in September 2020 Remove Rt 910 Edit Rt 180 Edit Rt 917 Rt 186/915 becomes 915 only (Will send data separately) PART 2 – FINAL MAPS TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 S T ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZR D S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCE NICD RSES 287TH ST 112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T H STSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST 130TH AVE SE35THWAYSER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E SE 301ST ST 36THSTSE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL118TH AVE SE65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4609Printed On: 7/24/2020 °0 1 Miles City of Auburn Highway Principal Arterial Future Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Future Minor Arterial Residential Collector Future Residential Collector Non Residential Collector Future Non Resident Collector Rustic Collector Local Private Functional Roadway Classification Map 2-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department .-14,478.-2,900.-7,095.-2,815.-87,550.-19,608 .-4,237.-1 4 , 2 8 7 .-35,58 3 .-18 , 9 9 9.-540.-3,89 0 .-8,593.-27,204.-1,638.-2,881.-6,161.-1,548.-4,517.-10,444.-5,844 .-12, 0 4 9.-9,450.-23,813.-9,482.-24,792.-9,675.-1,303.-26,293.-18,888.-22,447.-318,790 .-22,172 .-33,290 .-17,834.-19,500.-5,113.-7,866.-8,525.-18,009 .-5,212 .-4,146 .-7,959.-12,177 .-6,500 .-3 5 0 , 2 4 0 .-6,980.-2 5 , 1 4 5 .-2,616 .-12,894.-2,270.-10,950.-4,804 .-24,921.-20,329 .-26,027.-25,159 .-17,613.-21,818.-5,509.-4,612.-4,907.-3,580 .-2,321.-15,503 .-7,380 .-11,098.-3,179 .-9,147.-2,126 .-4,114 .-22,510 .-15,295.-9,892.-30,760 .-25,865.-2 1 , 1 5 7 .-6,191.-9,054.-28,701.-3,905.-3,311 .-14,455 .-3,817 .-6,072.-6,828 .-12,455.-4,218 .-27,785 .-8,207.-20,333.-9,415.-21,113.-22,540.-5 ,714.-12,618.-5,941 .-2,498 .-5,738 .-8,807 .-5,276 .-24,294 .-18,749.-6,812.-22,503 .-5,250.-32,300.-10,391.-6,086 .-9,644 .-3,519 .-6,576 .-2,881.-3,580 TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SER ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN ST SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 132ND AVE SEL A KE TAPPSPK WY S E 4 1 STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L A N D H IL L SWAYSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SN ST NEW ST NWSCENIC D R SES 287TH ST 118TH AVE SED ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE S4TH ST NE K ST SE4TH ST SW 7TH ST SE 6 7 T H S T SEM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SEUSTNW 35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 3 6 T H S T S E 64TH ST SE50THSTSE AST E 21ST ST N E1 08TH AVESES 297TH P L S 31 8TH ST 22ND ST SEE ST NES 292ND ST O ST SEV CT SE42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 49TH ST N E S 303RD PL 22ND ST NW K ST NE19TH ST SE 65TH ST SE SE 315TH PL108THAVESE104TH AVE SEA ST SET H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4592Printed On: 7/21/2020 °0 1 Miles Parks City of Auburn 100-999 1,000-9,999 10,000+ Average Daily Traffic Volumes (2019) Map 2-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 S T ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZR D S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NES 287TH ST SCE NICD RSE118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T H STSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST Auburn Ave130TH AVE SE35THWAYSER ST NW26TH ST SE SE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E SE 301ST ST 36THSTSE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SMUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4681Printed On: 10/18/2019 °0 1 Miles Truck Routes Map 2-3 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Priority 2 WSDOT Parks City of Auburn Priority 1 Current Local Truck Routes Future Local Truck Route Current Through Truck Route Future Through Truck Route Current Local Truck Route Future Local Truck Route TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1 STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST K E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE SSE 320TH ST 56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCENIC D R SES 287TH ST 118TH AVE SED ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE T ST SE57THPLSM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES305THSTU ST NW130TH AVE SE35 T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E S E 3 1 8 T H W A Y 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE AST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE ST H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4588Printed On: 7/21/2020 °0 1 Miles City of Auburn T1 (Over 10,000) T2 (4,000 - 10,000) T3 (300 - 4,000) T4 (100 - 300) T5 (Over 20 in 60 Days) Freight Routes Classification MapClass T-1 to T-5Annual Tons (in thousands) Map 2-4 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")10")4 ")16")18")1")13")11 ")35")17 ")19 ")27 ")26")9 ")12 ")8 ")14")25 ")15 ")3 ")23")5 ")22")6")2")33 ")31 TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY N124TH AVE SER ST SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW LAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 51ST AVE SK E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW ORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NWSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWO ST NE37TH ST NE S 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST 321ST ST S AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SED ST NE112TH AVE SEACADEMYDRSEK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 7TH ST SE 6 7 T H S T SELSTSEC ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE52ND AVE S47TH ST S E 56TH ST SE57THPLSSE 290TH ST 130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEBSTNE SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH S T N E 6 4 T H S T S EV ST NWAST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE31ST ST SE 22ND ST SEE ST NE42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST S E 295TH ST 5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST V CT SE72ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 2ND ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 307TH PL K ST NE5 7 T H D R S E S 324TH ST F ST NE56THAVE S 64TH ST SE SE 282ND ST OSTNERSTSEA ST SEM U C K L E S H O O T M U C K L E S H O O T C A S I N O C A S I N O T H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4603Printed On: 10/8/2015 °0 1 Miles Corridor Sections City of Auburn Auburn LOS Corridors Map 2-5 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")V ")V ")V ")V ")V ")V ")V ")V !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!(!(!(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(XW!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(XW!( !( !( !(XWXWXW!( ") !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !. !. !(XW!( !( ") !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !. !. !.!. !( !( TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST K E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE SSE 320TH ST 56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCENIC D R SES 287TH ST D ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE T ST SE57THPLSM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES 305TH ST U ST NW130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E S E 3 1 8 T H W A Y 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE AST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE SE 298TH PL 22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 72ND ST SE 42ND ST NE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL118TH AVE SE65TH ST SE51ST AVE ST H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4589Printed On: 7/28/2020 °0 1 Miles City of Auburn ")V Future Variable Message ")V Existing Variable Message !(City Signal XWPED Signal ")County Signal !.WSDOT ITS Copper ITS Fiber Future ITS Corridor Intelligent Transportation Systems Map 2-7 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department T H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N M U C K L E S H O O T M U C K L E S H O O T C A S I N O C A S I N O A U BURNWA Y S MONTEVISTADRSES 285TH ST S 289TH PL 16TH ST E 111TH PL SEB ST SE9TH ST SE 58TH PL SE 20TH ST NE 36TH ST SE HOPEAVE SE126THCT SE114THPL SE134TH CT SE SE 301ST WAY UDALLCT SENATHANAVE SE73RD ST SE87TH AVE S57TH AVE S 61ST AVE S122NDLN SE62ND ST SE U PL NE 56 T H ST S E S 317TH ST 129THPL SE24TH ST SE PIKEST NE57THPL S21ST ST NEL CT NE35TH ST SE 120THCT SEF ST SE28TH ST SE 30TH ST NE 37THPLSES 284TH ST S 318TH ST 59TH ST SE 32ND ST SE 18TH ST NE 67TH ST SE 55TH ST SE26TH PL NEF CT SE55THPL SSE 290TH STO PL NES301S T S T 11TH ST SE SE 291ST ST 23RD ST NE SCENIC DR SE59THPL S4TH ST SE V CT SE37TH ST SE57THPL SV ST NE54THAVE S2 1 S T S T N W H OWARDRDSE O CT SE60T HSTS E2ND ST E S 336TH PL 51ST ST NE B ST NWSE 322ND PL S 29 8 TH P LQ ST NE3RD ST SW 49TH ST NE 33RD ST S E LA K E T A P P S P K W Y S E55TH PL SSE 312TH C T 40THST SED ST NWS 291ST ST S DIVISION STDUNCANAVE SES 325TH CT 26TH ST NE C ST SEALPINESTSEA ST SEISTSES 292ND ST 5 3 R D A VES55THAVE SE L A I N E A V E S EPIKEST NEK ST SEE MAIN ST 40TH ST NE K ST NESE 308TH PL 15TH ST NW 104TH AVE SE12 5 T HPL SEE ST SW2ND ST NE 6 7 T H L N S EG PL SEC ST SEF PL NE J ST NEO ST SEE ST SE125THPL SE71ST ST SE5THSTSW L ST NESE 309TH PL 49TH ST SEA ST NE18TH ST NE K ST SE1 STSTNE4TH ST SE T ST SEA ST NWVS TSER ST NE19TH ST SE 117THPL SE15TH ST NW 112TH PL SEE ST NE27THPL SES 297TH PL 114THPL SE72ND ST SEISAACAVE SE58THPL S29TH ST SE9THCTNW WESLEYA V E SES C EN I CDR S E 31ST ST SE 119THPLS ESE 323R D S T PERRYAVE SE58THAVE S1ST ST NE E V A N CTSESE 299TH PL 47THAVE S15TH ST SE 35THW AYSE15TH ST SE 28TH ST SE 108T H AVE S E 127THPL SE108THAVE SE121ST PL SE121STPLS E51STAVE S72ND ST SEAABYDRNW2ND ST NE51STAVE SS 296TH PL S 320TH ST 112THAVE SEHAZELLOOP SESE 306TH ST 17 TH S T SE SE 296TH WAY JAMESPL SE305TH PL SE 29TH ST NW E ST SW3RD ST NE F ST SWIPLNE43RD ST NE 6 0 T H P L S 15TH ST NW R ST SE1ST ST SE 8TH ST NE 181STAVE E101STAV E S E 55TH AVE S56THAVE S129THPL SERIVERDR SEPOPLARST SEW ST NWO ST SE118THAVE SEN ST SE59THAVE S29TH S T NW 122NDPL SESE 309TH ST 52NDAVE SSE 326TH ST 33RD ST SE 32ND ST NE 11TH ST SET STNW8TH ST SE S 321ST ST V PL SE58THAVE SD PL SE 19TH ST SE 67THCT SE61ST AVE S54THCTS35TH ST NEB STNWS 329TH PL S 328TH ST 63RDPLSE100THAVE SEJORDANAVE SE33RD ST SE SE 308TH P L D STSER STSE33RD ST SE 57TH ST SEN STSE5 8 T HAVES130THAVE SE56THCT S 16TH ST SE FIR ST SEG STSE20TH ST NW 56THAVE S114THAVE SES 277TH ST 27TH ST SE GINKGOSTSE36THSTSE56TH ST SE 114THPLSE9T HST N E I STNEB STNWHAZELAVE SE4 8T H C T S E 6TH ST NE D STSE57THPL S5TH ST SE51STAVE SVICTORIAAVE SES E 3 2 1ST PL 7TH ST SE 138TH AVE SE118THAVE SE17TH ST SE 14TH ST SE SE295TH ST C STNWG STNW10TH ST NE 53RD ST SE 13TH ST SE 6TH ST NE 1 1 4 THWAYSEA STSE54TH ST SE 66TH ST SE56THAVE SS 326TH CT T ERRACEDRNWSE 315TH ST C STSEAUBURNWAY N26TH ST NW I STNE112THAVE SE63RDPL SS E 45TH ST52NDAVE SMSTNE17TH ST NE 129THPLSEK STNE15TH ST NE NATHANAVESEPERRYAVESEN STNEPIKESTNE60THAVESB STNE106THAVESES E 293R D S T E STSE19THPLSE5TH ST SE K STNEW MAIN ST 12TH ST NE 14TH ST NW K STNE8TH ST NE B STSESE288TH PLI STNEG STSES 305TH ST 2ND ST NE 107THAVE SE124TH AVE SE59THAVE SM STSE110THAVE SEA STNWJ STSE9TH ST SE66THAVE S8TH ST SE 7TH ST SEJ STNEE STSE176THAVE EG STSEL STSE2ND ST SE L STSE51STAVE S14TH ST SEN STNEI STSE176THAVE E28TH ST SE SE 304TH STI STNEBOUNDARY BLVD SW A STSE168THAVEEAUBURNWAY S31ST ST NE 28TH ST SE 26TH ST SE 108THAVESE52NDAVE S118THAVE SEPIKEST NE120THAVE SES 322ND PL SE 281STST H STSE7TH ST SE 124TH AVE SES E 3 1 3TH ST 23RD ST SE SE 296TH ST 19TH PL SET STSEPIKEST NEI STNEN STNEFRANCI SCTSE25TH ST SEM STSE124THAVE SESE 300TH WAY H STSE29TH ST SE B STSEPIKESTNEQUINCYAVESE22ND ST SE 110THAVE SE128TH PL SED STSE63RDPLSE127THPL SE8TH ST NE ASTNE5TH ST NE 25TH ST S E 3 5 TH W AY S EN STNEQ U I N C Y A V E S E2ND ST E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST SW 116TH AVE SEPIKESTN E 108THAVE SE31ST ST SE 5TH ST SE 15TH ST SW 4 9 T H S T N E L STNE21STCTSE59THAVES6 5 T H A V ES58THWAYSE SE 320TH ST 37T H ST S E E MAIN ST SE 323RD PL 15TH ST SW 23 RD S T SEAUBURNWAY NI STNE109THPLSESE 316TH ST 32ND ST NE 25TH ST SE LAKELANDHILLS WAY SE16TH S T NW R STSESE 282ND ST U STNWCROSS ST SES298THPL I STNEC STSWAUBURNWAYN53RD ST SE 127 THPLS ESE 297TH ST S E 300TH S T 112THAVE SE46THAVES 5 1 S T P L N E H A R V E Y R D N E 16TH ST SE ELMSTSECSTSEWEST VALLEYHWY S108THAVESEASTNE111THPLSE110THPL SE6TH ST SE S 324TH ST SE 288TH ST 19TH DR NE 124THAVE SEMAPLE DR SE R STSE55TH ST SE58THAVE SELAINEAVE SE15TH ST NE 4TH ST SW SE 294TH ST L A K E L A N D H I L L S W A Y S E DOGWOODDR SESE 320TH ST 124THAVE SESE 320TH ST 133RDAVE SEHENRYRDNESE282N D S T 42ND ST NE PERR Y D RSEH STNE124THAVE SE15THSTNW RSTNWS 302ND PL SE 292ND ST O STSER I V E R WALKD R SESE 307TH PL AUBURNWAY NWSTNW56 T HAV E S 4TH ST NE NATHANWAYSER STSE8TH ST NE 10TH ST NE E STNES 319TH ST LEAHILLRDSEAUBURNWAY NSE 43RD STW STNWCSTS W SE 290TH ST KENNEDYAVE SELAKE TAPPS PKWY SE49THAVE SAUBURN WAY NSE299TH ST 15TH ST SW AUBURNWAYNS 303RD PL SE 297TH ST KENNEDYAVESEI ST NE10TH ST NE 5 5THA VESSE 304TH ST 37TH ST NE W MAIN ST HSTNEM ST SEM ST SE15TH ST N W 2ND ST E 134THPL SE37TH ST NW S 277TH ST JASMINEAVE SE22ND ST NW ST U ARTPL SE15TH ST NE SE 288TH ST SE 281ST ST SE 290TH PL ORAVETZPLSE 1 6 7THA V EE28TH S T S E WARDAVE SEOLYMPICST SEA ST SEAUBUR N WAY S 68THLOOPSEWYMANDR SELEA HIL L RD SE 37TH ST NW AUBU R NWAY N A ST SE55THAVE SSE 295THST 37TH ST NE SCENICDRSE ASTE 57TH ST SE 107THAVE SE 37 TH ST NW S E 3 04TH S T S 312 T H S T NOBLECTSESE289TH STI ST NES E 31 8 THW A Y52NDAVE SSE 310TH ST ELIZ ABETHLOO PSESE 285TH ST 140THAVE SEA U B U R NWA Y N 62ND LO OP SE42ND ST NE EAST VALLEYHWYE8TH ST NE FORE S T RIDGE D R S E55THAVES112TH AVE SEKATHERINE AVE SEA U B U R N W A Y S FORESTR I D GE DR SE 37TH ST NW 20TH ST SEWEST VALLEYHWY NSE 294TH ST 118THAVE SE15TH ST SW 124THAVE SE140THAVE SE23RD ST SE F RANCISL O OPSEB ST NWW MAIN ST A ST SESE 304THS TBOUNDARY BLVD SW SKYLARK VILLAGE RD SEWESTERNAVE NW16TH ST NE 109THAVESE A U B U R N W A Y S L A K E TA P P S P K W Y S E S 277TH ST SE 286TH ST CSTNW5 7 T HD R SE142NDAVESE SE 326THPLPEARLAVE SESE 312TH ST SE 312TH ST SE 299TH ST SE 288TH ST 132NDAVE SE51STAVE SA ST SES 318TH ST G ST SEH ST SE124THAVE SES 316TH ST PIKEST NW23RD ST SE 25TH ST SE A U B U R N W A Y S HEATHERAVE SES K Y W A Y L N S E 148THAVE SEA ST NE42ND ST NW MSTSEBSTNWLUNDRD SWMONTEVISTADRSE L A K E T A P P S P K W Y S E 3 6THS T S E21STSTNE SE 3 1 2THW A YMILLPO N D LOOPS E SE 295TH S T EAST VALLEYHWY EORAVETZRDSE1 0 8THA V E SE37TH PL SES 277TH ST WEST VALLEYHWY NTERRAC EVIEWLNS E DSTNEL A K E LANDH IL L S W AYSESE 301ST ST 15TH ST NW AUBURNWAY NA ST SEA ST NW2ND ST E54TH AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSAUBURN WAY S55THAVE S56THAVE SWEST VALLEYHWY NWESTVALLEYHWYNC ST SWA ST SEAUB U R N W A Y S S E 287THST 47TH ST SERIVERWALKDRSEA ST SEWESTVALLEYHWYNKER S E Y WAY S EHIGHLANDDRSE EASTVALLE YRDSEUSTNWB ST NWISTNWB ST NWOUTLETCOLL E CTIONRDS W 124TH AVE SEAUBURN-BLACKDIAMONDRDSE WESTVALLEYHWYSORAVETZRDSEKERSEY WAY SE LAKETA P P S PKWYS E O R A VETZRDSECLAY ST NWS 287TH ST FOSTER AVE SEL A K E TAPPS P K W YSEAUBURNMANORRDSE S UMNE R -TAPPSHWY EDSTNWRONCROCKETTDRNWA U B U R N W A Y SWESTVALLEYHWYNA U B U R N W A Y S AUBU R N W A Y S KERS E Y WA Y S E 144TH AVE SET ERRACEDRNWHICR E S TDR NWC ST NWB ST NWEASTBLVDP E A S LEY CANYON RDS RONCROCKETTDRNW104THAVESEOUT LE T COLLECTI ONDRS WPA CIFICAVES4 1 S TSTSEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEC ST SWSTUCK RIVER DR SE TS167 TS167 TS18 COMP-11 COMP-20 COMP-21 COMP-2 COMP-12 COMP-10 COMP-20 COMP-24 COMP-20 COMP-6 COMP-8 COMP-17 COMP-1 COMP-3 COMP-9 COMP-18 COMP-5 COMP-14 COMP-13 COMP-25 COMP-7 COMP-22 COMP-23 COMP-19 COMP-4 Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 6184Printed On: 8/14/2020 °0 1 Miles Parks City of Auburn Comprehensive Plan Projects Comprehensive Plan Projects Source: City of Auburn GIS Department COMP-15 Map 2-8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SC ST SWI ST NEM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEWEST VALLEY HWY NC ST NW15TH ST SW LAKE TAPPS PKWY SE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW SE 304TH ST E MAIN ST 132ND AVE SE51ST AVE SKERSEY WAY SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELAND HILLS WAY SEORAVETZ RD SEM ST NESE 320TH STD ST NWA ST NE4TH ST SE 104TH AVE SERON CROCKETT DR NWA ST NWWEST VALLEY H WY S LEA HILL R D S E 37TH ST NE S 316TH ST S 277TH ST RIVERWALK DR SED ST NE112TH AVE SEEAST VALLEY HWY EHARVEY RD NE 15TH ST NE PEASLEY CANYON RD S BOUNDARY BLVD SW SE 30 4 T H W A Y Auburn Ave41ST ST SETERRACE DR NWSE 281ST ST SUMNER- T A P P S H W Y E AU B U R N - B L A C K D I A M O N D R D S E 17TH ST SE HO W A R D R D S E 6TH ST SE 3RD ST SW 3RD ST NW INDUSTRY DR SW16TH ST NW 9 T H S T N E A ST SESE 304TH ST R ST SE124TH AVE SESE 304TH ST SE 320TH ST 112TH AVE SEA ST NWC ST NESTUCK RIVER DR SE 2ND ST E 53RD ST SEM ST NWM ST NESE 288TH ST 37TH ST SE SE 284TH ST 22ND ST NE 46TH PL S 41ST ST SE 17TH ST SE 25TH ST SE EAST BLVDPERIMETER RD SW12TH ST SE S 296TH ST R ST NED ST SE55TH AVE S56TH AVE S110TH AVE SEPACIFIC AVE S116TH AVE SE51ST AVE SI ST NWM ST SESE 299TH ST N ST NEE ST NEO ST NESCENIC DR SEW ST NW69TH ST S E S 287TH ST H ST NW62ND ST SE 6TH ST SE S 300TH PL 44TH ST NW A ST NECLAY ST NWSE 316TH ST 14TH ST NE 127TH PL SEEVERGREE N W A Y S E58TH AVE SK ST SE49TH ST NE 144TH AVE SE4TH ST NE 7TH ST SE 4TH ST SW 5TH ST SE BRIDGET AVE SEFRONTAGE RDD ST NES 331ST ST L ST SEI ST SEDOGWOOD ST SEF ST SEC ST SE67TH ST S E PIKE ST NE8TH ST SE T ST SE118TH AVE SEFOSTER AVE SEG ST SEH ST SE57TH PL SB ST SEMILL POND DR SE140TH AVE SEE ST SEG PL SE52ND AVE S105TH PL SE32ND ST NE RIVER D R S E SE 310TH ST 47TH ST SE 56TH ST SE54TH AVE SSE 296TH WAY QUINCY AVE SESE 290TH ST U ST NWS 305TH ST 112TH AVE SEE MAIN ST J ST SE130TH AVE SED ST NW28TH ST NE R ST NWOLIVE AVE SEELIZABETH AVE SE30TH ST NE 61ST AVE S51ST ST NE SE 323RD PLB ST NE26TH ST SE65TH AVE SSE 318TH W A Y SE 301ST ST 32ND ST S E 36TH ST SE SE 287TH ST 64TH AVE S50TH S T S E 10TH ST NE 29TH ST NW HEMLOCK ST SEV ST NWA ST E21ST ST N E 31ST ST SE 30TH ST SE S 2 9 7TH P L SE 298TH PL85TH AVE S24TH ST SE HIGH L AND D R S E S 318TH ST 23RD ST SEH ST NE22ND ST SEPIKE ST NWO ST SESE 282ND ST 42ND ST NW LUND RD SWS 288TH ST 24TH ST NE 19TH DR NE 111TH PL SED ST SW27TH ST SE 108TH AVE SE V ST SE10TH ST SE 8TH ST NE 20TH ST SE V CT SESE 295TH ST 176TH AVE EF ST SWSE 286TH ST 49TH AVE SE ST SW66TH ST SE104TH PL SE72ND ST SE 148TH AVE SEALPINE ST SE128TH PL SEB PL NW 16TH ST SE 13TH ST SE 42ND ST NE G ST SW2ND ST SE ELM ST SE6TH ST NW 73RD ST SE S E 3 1 2 T H W A Y 57TH ST SE55TH PL SL ST NES 312TH ST S 292ND ST CHARLOTTE AVE SE9TH ST SE52ND PL SSE 285TH ST ISAAC AVE SEHAZEL AVE SESE 307TH PL 28TH ST SE T ST NEJ ST NE15TH ST SE 45TH S T N E SE 308TH PL 14TH ST S E 26TH ST NE HEATHER AVE SEMAPLE DR SE RANDALL AVE SEK ST NESE 43RD ST S 319TH ST 20TH ST NW 22ND ST NW NOBLE CT SER PL SE S 322ND ST S 314TH S T 19TH ST SE WARD AVE SESE 297TH ST 129TH PL SE21ST ST SEI PL NE33RD ST SE SE 307TH ST 63RD PL S E 55TH ST SE SE 32 3 R D S T WESTERN AVE NW111TH AVE SE114TH AVE SE117TH PL SETERRACE VIEW LN SEF ST NESE 296TH ST 112TH PL SE134TH PL SESE 306TH ST 12TH ST NE ORAVETZ PL SE 35TH ST NE SE 286TH PL 8TH ST SW KATHERINE AVE SE142ND AVE SEJASMINE AVE SESE 300TH ST 43RD ST NE 59TH AVE S46TH AVE S63RD PL S22ND WAY NE S 322ND PL STILLMAN ST SE 18TH ST SE FIR ST SEELAINE AVE SE6TH ST NE66TH AVE SV P L SE107TH AVE SESE 305TH PL KENNEDY AVE SESE 314TH PL S 307TH ST 56TH PL SAABY DR NWSE 3 1 8 T H P L121ST PL SEC PL SE14TH ST NW I ST NE37TH PL SE56TH CT S49TH ST NW 28TH PL SESE 304TH PL 71ST ST SE 26TH ST NW 120TH AVE SE113TH PL SES 329TH PL S 328TH ST 58TH W A Y S E SE 321ST PL 49TH S T S E SE 311TH ST S 321ST ST 114TH WAY SE54TH CT SFRANKLIN AVE SE11TH ST SE 168TH AVE ESE 315TH PL S 320TH ST 181ST AVE E13TH ST NEQ ST NE23RD ST NE 305TH PL SE 27TH PL SEL P L S E 53RD A V E S S 292ND ST SE 310TH ST 26TH ST NE 118TH AVE SESE 282N D S T SE 29 5TH STK ST NE47TH S T S ED ST SET ST SEE ST NE17TH ST SE 24TH ST SE 14TH ST SEPIKE ST NWB ST NE28TH ST SE56TH AVE S4TH ST NE I ST SE22ND ST SEV ST NW9TH ST SE PIKE ST NEL ST SEK ST SE29TH ST NW 57TH ST SEOLIVE AVE SE61ST AVE S50TH S T S E 30TH ST NE ELM ST SEL ST NEC ST SE49TH ST NE 107TH AVE SE37TH ST SE112TH PL SEF ST SE129TH PL SE2ND ST SE ELIZABETH AVE SE16TH ST SE DOGWOOD ST SESE 286TH PL SE 295TH ST 36TH S T S EA ST SEB ST NWAUBURNWAYSI ST NEC ST SWM ST SER ST SE124THAVESEWESTVALLEYHWYNSE304THST CSTNW15TH ST SW STUCKRIVERDRSE 15TH ST NW LAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST SE 288TH ST 37TH ST NW ORAVETZ R D SE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD110TH AVE SEA ST NE104THAVESEISTNW51ST AVE SRONCROCKETTDRNWN ST NE 112THAVESEA C ADEMYDR S E MONTEVI STADRS E JOHNREDDINGTONRDNEG ST SEESTSE108THAVESE16TH ST NE O ST SESE 32 6 T H P LT ST NW2NDSTSE SE294THST ELMLNSE 118THAVESEPERRY AVE SES303RDPL SE289 THST 57 T H DRSE 33RD ST S E S 310TH ST U CT NWR ST NEO PL NEA ST SETS18 TS18 MUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO TS167 TS167 THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4587Printed On: 8/18/2020 °0 1 Miles 5 Education Facilities Existing Sidewalk on One Side Existing Sidewalk on Both Sides Future Pedestrian Corridors Multi-Use Trail Downtown Urban Center (DUC) Zone Future Priority Sidewalk Corridors Map 3-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department TS18 TS18 A ST SEB ST NWI ST NEA U B U R N W A Y S C ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW STUCK RIVER DR S E 2ND ST E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1 STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST K E R S E Y W AYSE SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW L A K E L ANDHI LLSWAYSEORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE SSE 320TH ST 56TH AVE SD ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCENIC D R SES 287TH ST D ST NE112TH AVE SE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE T ST SE57THPLSM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SERIVERDRSES305THSTU ST NW130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NW26TH ST SEB ST NESE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E S E 3 1 8 T H W A Y 3 6 T H S T S E 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE AST ESE304THWAY108THAVESE22ND ST SE 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE SE 285TH ST PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL118TH AVE SE65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE STS167 TS167 T H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4604Printed On: 7/27/2020 °0 1 Miles Existing Trailheads Future Trailheads Bike Facility Future Bike Facility Trail Future Trail Existing and Future Bicycle Facilities and Multi-Use Trails Map 3-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 55 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 INTERURBAN TRAILMAIN ST CONNECTORA/B STREET CORRIDOR124TH AVE SE CORRIDORGREEN RIVER ROAD CORRIDORLEA HILL CONNECTOR STEWART/LAKE TAPPS CONNECTORSOUTH AUBURN M STREET SE CORRIDORWEST VALLEY CORRIDORA ST SE AND LAKELAND H ILLS CORR IDOR NORTH 37TH ST NW AND WEST HILL CONNECTOR NORTH AUBURN R STREET NE / I STREET NE CORRIDORRIV E R W A L K - A U B U R N W A Y S - E N U M C L A W C O N N E C T O R KE R S E Y W A Y / L A K E T A P P S C O R R I D O RC STREET TRAIL AND 15TH ST SW CORRIDORTS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 A ST SEA U B U RNWAYSB ST NWC ST SWISTNEM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SE132ND AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST S 277TH ST C ST NW15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCK RIVER DR S E W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW LAKE T A P P S P K W Y S E 4 1STST S E 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST 51ST AVE SKERSEY W AY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE ORAVETZRDSE25TH ST SE EAST BLVDSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104TH AVE SEI ST NWWESTVALLEYHWYSSE 299TH ST N ST NEW ST NWOSTNE37TH ST NE S 287TH ST 56TH AVE SSCENIC D R SE118TH AVE SESE 316TH ST AUBURN-BLACKDIAMOND RD SED ST NE112TH AVE SEACADEMYDRSEPEASLEYCANYONR D S EAST VALLEY HWY E4TH ST SW 8TH ST SE C ST SEM ST NEJOHNREDDINGTONRDNEH ST SEB ST SEFOSTER AVE SE47TH ST S E 56TH ST SE S 305TH ST57TH PLS130TH AVE SE35T H W A Y S ER ST NWBSTNESE 323RD PL 17TH ST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SEV ST NW21ST S T N E 108TH AVESE23R D ST S E 36 T H S T S E 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST O ST SE5 1 S T S T S E SE 286TH ST 72ND ST SE 2ND ST SE PEARL AVE SE62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL J ST NEK ST NE5 7 T H D R S E S 324TH ST FIR ST SE43RD ST NE A ST SEM U C K L E S H O O T M U C K L E S H O O T C A S I N O C A S I N OT H E T H E O U T L E T O U T L E T C O L L E C T I O N C O L L E C T I O N K E N T K E N T P I E R C E P I E R C E C O U N T Y C O U N T Y K I N G K I N G C O U N T Y C O U N T Y PA C I F I C PA C I F I C S U M N E R S U M N E R E D G E W O O D E D G E W O O D A L G O N A A L G O N A F S T R E E T / L E S G O V E C O R R I D O R AUB U R N B L A C K D I A M O N D / G R E E N V A L L E Y R O A D C O N N E C T O RDownhillB.P.A Powerline Right of Way B.P.A Powerline Right of Way B.P.A Po w erli n e Rig ht of W ay VALENTINEToToF l a m i n g F l a m i n g G e y s e r G e y s e r @ EMERALDDOWNS AUBURNDOWNTOWN SUPERMALL YMCA LES GOVE H i l l AUBURNGOLFCOURSEBRANNAN PARK MARYOLSONPARK LAKELAND HILLSCOMMERCIALAREA Only ToToK e n t K e n t@ ToToK e n t K e n t@ ToToK e n t K e n t@ @ ToToK e n t K e n t&&S e a t t l e S e a t t l e@ @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToF e d e r a l F e d e r a l Wa y Wa y @ToToE d g e w o o d E d g e w o o d @ToToM i l t o n M i l t o n @To To Ta c o m a Ta c o m a @ToToS u m n e r S u m n e r&&P u y a l l u p P u y a l l u p @ToToS u m n e r S u m n e r&&B o n n e y B o n n e yL a k e L a k e @ToToB o n n e y B o n n e yL a k e L a k e @ ToToE n u m c l a w E n u m c l a w ToToB l a c k B l a c kD i a m o n d D i a m o n d @ ToToP a c i f i c P a c i f i cR a c e w a y s R a c e w a y s @ GRCC GAMEFARMPARK MUCKLESHOOTCASINO PACIFICRACEWAYS INTERURBAN TRAILINTERURBAN TRAILToToK e n t K e n t@ RecommendedUphill Route AUBURNENVIRONMENTALPARK Auburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4593Printed On: 10/6/2015 °0 1 Miles Connectors Corridors Interurban Trail City of Auburn Bicycle Corridors and Connectors Map 3-3 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department Focus Area ^_ TS18 TS18 TS167 TS167 MUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZRD S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCE NICD RSES 287TH ST 118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T HSTSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST 35THWAYSER ST NW130TH AVE SE26TH ST SEB ST NESE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108TH AV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 21ST ST SE 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SAuburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4510Printed On: 7/15/2020 °0 1 Miles ^_Auburn Transit Station Park & Ride Metro Transit Routes Pierce Transit Routes Sound Transit Routes Muckleshoot Shuttle Routes Auburn Transit Routes and MIT Shuttle Route Map 4-1 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")164 ")181 ")181 ")160 ")952 ")566 ")566 ")578")181 ")917 ")180 ")497 ")917 ")578 ")497 ")915")MIT Shuttle ^_ TS18 TS18 MUCKLESHOOT CASINO MUCKLESHOOT CASINO THE OUTLET COLLECTION THE OUTLET COLLECTION TS167 TS167 A ST SEB ST NWAUBURN WAY SI ST NEC ST SWM ST SEAUBURN WAY NR ST SE124TH AVE SEE MAIN STWESTVALLEYHWYN SE 304TH ST C ST NWS 277TH ST 15TH ST SW 2ND ST E STUCKRIVERDRSE W MAIN ST 15TH ST NW 132ND AVE SELAKETAPPS PKWYSE 41 ST ST SE 29TH ST SE SE 312TH ST KERSEYWAY S E SE 288TH ST 8TH ST NE 37TH ST NW LAKELANDHILLSWAYSEO R A V ETZRD S E 25TH ST SE EAST BLVD55TH AVE S56TH AVE SSE 320TH ST D ST SE110TH AVE SE4TH ST SE 104THAVESEI ST NW51ST AVE SWESTVALLEYHWYSN ST NEW ST NWO ST NESCE NICD RSES 287TH ST 118TH AVE SE112TH AVE SED ST NE58TH AVE SK ST SEEAST VALLEY HWY E4THSTSW 7TH ST SE T ST SEC ST SE57THPLSM ST NEH ST SEJOHNREDDINGTONRDN E FOSTER AVE SEB ST SE47T HSTSE 56THSTSEU ST NWS 305TH ST 35THWAYSER ST NW130TH AVE SE26TH ST SEB ST NESE318THWAY SE 323RD PL 17TH ST S E 36THST SE 50TH ST NE 64TH ST SE A S TE 108THAV ESESE304T HWAY SE 298TH PL 42ND ST NW S 292ND ST SE 282ND ST 51STSTSE SE 286TH ST V CT SE32ND ST SE 42ND ST NE 73RD ST SE PEARL AVE SESE 285TH ST 62ND ST SE SE 307TH PL 21ST ST SE 65TH ST SEA ST SE51ST AVE SAuburn Transportation Plan Map ID: 4684Printed On: 7/15/2020 °0 1 Miles ^_Auburn Transit Station Park & Ride Transit Dependent Areas Metro Transit Routes Pierce Transit Routes Sound Transit Routes Muckleshoot Shuttle Routes Auburn Transit Routes and Transit Dependent Areas Map 4-2 Source: City of Auburn GIS Department ")164 ")181 ")181 ")160 ")952 ")566 ")566 ")578")181 ")917 ")184 ")497 ")917 ")578 ")497 ")915 ")MIT Shuttle -------------------------- Ordinance No. 6803 November 30, 2020 Page 20 Exhibit G Land Use Element EXHIBIT 1 – Proposed Text Amendment to the Land Use Element LAND USE ELEMENT Institutional Designation (page LU-14 – LU-15) Description This category includes those areas that are reserved for public or institutional uses. These public uses include public schools and institutional uses such as large churches and schools. It is also intended to include those of a significant impact, and not those smaller public uses that are consistent with and may be included in another designation. For example, public uses of an industrial character are included in the industrial designation, and small-scale religious institutions of a residential character are included in the residential designation. Designation Criteria 1. Previously developed institutional uses; or 2. Located along major arterial streets; 3. Properties that are buffered from the single-family designation by landscaping, environmental features, or the Residential Transition designation and buffered from all other Residential designations; and 4. Meets the development parameters of the Institutional designation. 5. Properties identified in the Airport Master Plan as Landing Field. Implementing Zoning Designations Institutional Landing Field Policies LU-101 A responsible management entity and the purpose for the institutional designation should be identified for each property interest within this designation. Management policies and plans are appropriate for all lands in this designation. LU-102 Appropriate uses for this designation include facilities that serve the needs of the larger community such as public schools, active parks, city operated municipal facilities, large churches, and fire stations. LU-103 This designation permits a wide array of uses that tend to be located in the midst of other dissimilar uses. For this reason, special emphasis should be directed at the following: a. The appropriateness of new requests for this designation and the impacts that it may have on the surrounding community. b. Site-specific conditions that should be attached to the granting of new requests for this designation that are designed to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community. c. Site-specific conditions that should be attached to development proposals that are designed to mitigate impacts on the surrounding community. LU-104 Coordination with other public or institutional entities is essential in the implementation of the institutional land use designation. LU-105 Industrial and commercial uses that are affiliated with and managed by educational institutions for vocational educational purposes may be classified as an institutional use and permitted on a conditional basis. LU-106 For the Landing Field (LF) zone, an Airport Master Plan (AMP) should be developed that establishes the vision, policies, and implementation strategies that govern uses, management principles, and future planning efforts. The AMP shall be incorporated by reference in the Auburn Comprehensive Plan as an appendix. For the Landing Field designation, an Airport Master Plan should be developed that establishes the vision, policies, and implementation strategies that govern uses, management principles, and future planning efforts. Uses and activi- ties within and surrounding this designation must comply with the requirements of the Federal Aviation Administration. LU-107 Auburn Municipal Airport is included in the federal airport system - the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS). Participation in the NPIAS is limited to public use airports that meet specific FAA activity criteria. NPIAS airports are eligible for federal funding of improvements through FAA programs. To maintain eligibleligibilitye for funding through FAA programs, the Airport Master Plan should be periodically updated as conditions change. LU-108 Uses, activities, and operations within the LF Airport Landing Field District must be coordinated and consistent with the Airport Master Plan. LU-109 Future expansions of the LF Airport Landing Field District, for the purpose of airport uses, activities, and operations, should be coordinated and consistent with the Airport Master Plan. LU-110129 While the industrially designated area east of the Airport is highly suited for airport related activities, other industrial type uses are now located here. Therefore, the City will encourage use in this area to take advantage of its proximity to the Airport.Auburn Municipal Airport Area - The area east of Auburn’s Municipal Airport is an features industrial land use designations. While industrial type uses are now located here, the area is highly suited for air related activities. The City will encourage use in this area to take advantage of its proximity to the Airport and control adverse effects to airport operations. LU-111 New commercial land uses in proximity to the airport should be air-related and/or complementary to the airport. LU-112 To protect the viability of the Auburn Municipal Airport the City shall create an airport overlay that is consistent with FAA regulations and WSDOT guidance. LU-113Air-05: The City’s zoning ordinance and other appropriate regulatory measures shall enforce the airport overlay and the FAR Part 77 surfaces.The City’s zoning ordinance and other appropriate regulatory measures shall enforce the airport clear zones as regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The impact of development on air safety shall be assessed through SEPA review, and appropriate mitigation measures shall be required by the City. LU-114 The airport overlay shall protect the operations of the Auburn Municipal Airport by establishing controls on incompatible land uses and development. LU-115 The airport overlay should be implemented to manage land uses and development around the airport to ensure compatibility into the future and prevent incompatible future uses. The regulations applied to properties surrounding the airport should encourage land uses that are related to, and benefit from, proximity to the airport but not restricted exclusively to only these. LU-116 The impact of development on air safety shall be assessed through the City zoning ordinance, FAA regulations, SEPA review, input from the Auburn Municipal Airport, and relevant technical guidance. Appropriate mitigation measures shall be required by the City. LU-117 Uses in proximity to the airport that may create potential operational (e.g. height or noise) conflicts shall be reviewed for their consistency to airport operations and conformance with the FAA regulations. LU-118 The airport should be protected from nonconforming uses and structures that pose a safety concern to airport operations. LU-119 The City shall determine whether nonconforming uses and structures affect airport operations and require their minimization or elimination, at cost to owner, based on individualized study of proposals, City regulations, input from the Auburn Municipal Airport, and relevant technical guidance. Special Planning Area Designation (page LU-24) Description “Special Planning Areas” consist of Districts, subareas, Impression Corridors, and Gateways within Auburn that warrant additional emphasis in planning, investments, and policy development. Each may be recognized separately within the Comprehensive Plan, as an Element of the Comprehensive Plan, or as an subarea plan (discussed below). There are a variety of reasons for designating and distinguishing a special planning area, and once designated, a variety of potential outcomes. Reasons for designating a special planning area include: Areas of high visibility and traffic. These areas create an impression or image of Auburn. It is therefore particularly important to ensure that they are attractive and well maintained. Examples include Auburn Way South and as- sociated major highway on- and off-ramps. Land use activities that warrant joint planning between the City and owner/operator. In addition to developing approaches and strategies for the land use activity, there may be additional emphasis on ensuring compatibility with surrounding land uses. Examples include, Green River College, the Auburn Municipal Airport, and Emerald Downs Thoroughbred Horse Racetrack. Neighborhoods in which a resident and merchant live and conduct daily business and leisure. Neighborhoods may also be distinguished by physical setting, physical separations, and similarity over an area. Examples include downtown, Lea Hill, and Lakeland. Areas with a focused desire to create greater physical and economic cohesiveness. These may be large planned developments or clusters. Examples include the Auburn North Business Area and Mt. Rainier Vista. Areas with an existing built environment or an existing regulatory framework that does not, in itself, meet the expectations of the seven values that underscore the Comprehensive Plan. Examples include the need for multimodal connections between West Hill and Lea Hill to north and downtown Auburn. Subarea Policies. LU-129 Auburn Municipal Airport Area - The area east of Auburn’s Municipal Airport is an features industrial land use designations. While industrial type uses are now located here, the area is highly suited for air related activities. The City will encourage use in this area to take advantage of its proximity to the Airport and control adverse effects to airport operations. 333.3 NAD_1983_StatePlane_Washington_North_FIPS_4601_Feet Feet333.3166.70 1:2,000 Ordinance 6803 Exhibit D.2 1in =167 ft 11/25/2020Printed Date: Map Created by City of Auburn eGIS Imagery Date: May 2015 Information shown is for general reference purposes only and does not necessarily represent exact geographic or cartographic data as mapped. The City of Auburn makes no warranty as to its accuracy.