HomeMy WebLinkAboutShapiro & Assoc #SA-PR562-001
.
ANNUAL CONTRACT TASK ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT
AGREEMENT #: AG-C-220 TASK #: SA-PR562-001
CONSULTANT: ~hapiro & Associates. Inc.
PROJECT #: PR562. South 277th Street Reconstruction Proiect
The general provisions and clauses of the Agreement referenced above shall be in
full force and effect for this Task Assignment.
Location of Project: Wetlands mitigation sites at Goedecke North (SE corner of West
Valley and West Main Streett and the Mill Creek site lSW corner of Frontaae Road and
44th St. NW)
Maximum Amount Payable per this Task Assignment: $18.000.00
Completion Date: 12/31/04
Scope of Work:
See attached Exhibit A, Scope of Work and Exhibit S, Fee Schedule, both of which are
attached and by this reference made part of this Agreement.
ADDrovals:
C,","II... P)iict Me~ ' -- Date: ~-~OL
Signature: J. . ~
,
Agency Project Manager:
Signature: Date:
AgonoyMoyor. ~~ @ ~
S;gnelU"" - ,~ - · P Dot.,
Note: If this task order is over $25,000 then it must go before the u Ii Works
Committee and City Council for approval prior to the Mayor's signature.
lJ~~
J
Page 1 of 1
-"---,,- ----
ANNUAL CONTRACT TASK ASSIGNMENT DOCUMENT
AGREEMENT #: AG -C -220 TASK #: SA -PR562 -001
CONSULTANT: Shapiro & Associates. Inc.
PROJECT #: PR562, South 277th Street Reconstruction Protect
The general provisions and clauses of the Agreement referenced above shall be in
full force and effect for this Task Assignment.
Location of Project: Wetlands mitigation sites at Goedecke North (SE corner of West
Maximum Amount Payable per this Task Assignment: $18.000.00
Completion Date: 12/31/04
Scope of Work:
See attached Exhibit A, Scope of Work and Exhibit B, Fee Schedule, both of which are
attached and by this reference made part of this Agreement.
Approvals:
Consultant Project Manager/:
Signature: Lf L Date: e�'d'S'Cl
Agency Project Manager:
Signature: Signature: 0l A >��� Date: 3/1/0
Agency Mayor:
Signature: Date:
Note: If this task order is buer $25,00Vtheh4it m efore the Public Works
Committee and City Council for approval prior to the Mayor's signature.
Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
February 23, 2004
Mr. Scott Nutter
City of Auburn Public Works
Department, Engineering Division
25 West Main
Auburn, WA 98001
Re: Scope of Work and Budget for Wetland Mitigation Monitoring
South 27ih Street Reconstruction (Contract AG-C-220; Task:
SA-PR562-001 )
Shapiro Project Number 1035016.1T
Dear Scott:
In response to the City of Auburn's (City) request, Shapiro and Associates, Inc.
(SHAPIRO) is pleased to provide the following proposed scope of work and
budget for wetland monitoring. The approach reflected in the scope is based on
requirements defined in the Final Wetland Mitigation Plan for the South 277th
Street Reconstruction, Phase I project prepared by Herrera Environmental
Consultants (April 2001). The plan addresses four mitigation areas. These
include the Floodplain Mitigation Site, two areas at the Goedecke North Site, and
the Mill Creek Site. The plan states that vegetation monitoring will be conducted in
years 1, 2, 3, and 5 at the Floodplain Mitigation Site and in years 1, ;~, 3, 5, 7, and
10 at the Goedecke North Sites and the Mill Creek Site. As you reqLlested,
SHAPIRO's role will involve Year 1 monitoring at all four sites. It is understood
that monitoring during subsequent years would be subject to future work
authorizations under the City's consultant selection process.
In developing this scope of work and budget, the following assumptions were
made: (1) monitoring will occur during the 2004 growing season; (2) all required.
permit approvals for the work have been received from regulatory agencies; (3)
site access approvals will be provided to SHAPIRO in advance of the work, and
(4) monitoring will be based on requirements in the Final Mitigation Report for the
South 277th Street Reconstruction, Phase I project (Herrera, April 2(01), and
project as-built plans. Requirements for Standards of Success, Monitoring of the
Mitigation Site (Methods), Plant Coverage, Water Regime, and Reporting from the
Final Mitigation Report (Herrera, April 2001) are included below.
- -.-.----'" _.._-_....._~- ---..--
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK
The approach for implementing the scope of work is described und'9r the
following tasks. For each task, the nature of work, anticipated level of effort,
assumptions, and deliverables are described.
Unforeseen site conditions, additional or changing regulatory considerations, or
other factors that result in the need for a greater magnitude of effort related to
these or other new tasks will require the development and approval of a contract
amendment prior to conducting such work.
TASK 1 - PROJECT MOBILIZATION
Based on the initial Task (#SA-PR562-001) request from the City under this on-
call services contract (#AG-C-220), two SHAPIRO staff will participate in a half-day
reconnaissance inspection to the four mitigation sites with the City's project
manager and will review as-built drawings for the planting plans at the respective
sites.
Assumptions:
. The City will provide SHAPIRO with advanced authorization to access the
project site, and any adjacent private properties as required.
. Monitoring work will be based on documents provided by the City to SHAPIRO
on January 27, 2004.
Deliverable:
. None.
TASK 2 - VEGETATION MONITORING
Task 2.1 - Planting InsDection
When notified by the City to do so, SHAPIRO staff will conduct a one-day site visit
to inspect replacement plantings at the mitigation sites. The plant inspections
will be conducted to ensure nursery stocks are of suitable quality and that
supplemental planting efforts are successfully implernented. It is anticipated the
inspection will be conducted in March 2004; however, the exact date will be
determined by the City.
Assumption:
. Two site visits of up to 16 hours will be conducted to inspect replacement of
dead plants.
---_._-------_._~,----- -- - - - ---- ----.-. -'~-,-' ._---,--
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 3
Deliverables:
. Field report verifying completion of plant replacement according to City
requirements.
. As-built drawings as per the ACOE.
Task 2.2 - Review of Information
SHAPIRO will conduct a review of the Final Mitigation Report for the South 277lh
Street Reconstruction, Phase I project (Herrera, April 2001) and other project
information to assist and ensure proper implementation of vegetation and
hydrology monitoring methods.
Deliverable:
. None.
Task 2.3 - Data Collection
SHAPIRO will evaluate wetland vegetation at each site using methods presented
in the referenced document mentioned in Task 2.2 and as described below.
Areas to be evaluated include the Floodplain Mitigation Site, the two areas at the
Goedecke North Site, and the Mill Creek Site. At each location, and during each
inspection, digital or film-based photographs will be taken from fixed
documentation points established during the first site visit. Data will be recorded
on standardized forms the format of which shall be approved in advance by the
City.
Deliverable:
. None.
TASK 3 - WATER REGIME MONITORING
Task 3.1 - Equipment Installation (gauges and wells)
SHAPIRO will install staff/crest gauges and shallow groundwater monitoring
wells at all sites consistent with methods described in the mitigation plan.
Installations will occur at the Floodplain Mitigation Site, the two areas at the
Goedecke North Site, and the Mill Creek Site.
Assumptions:
. SHAPIRO will install a total of 3 staff/crest gauges and 8 shallow groundwater
wells consistent with methods described in the mitigation plan.
. The City will enlist the services of a surveyor to measure elevations within the
project area and will provide SHAPIRO with surveyed locations where
groundwater wells are sited as specified in the performance standards (see
below).
- - --------- ----_.~.__._..- ,-.--.--.-- ------------~-- _.__.._..-.~_.._-_..._~-
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 4
. SHAPIRO will provide all resources required to install and monitor the
staff/crest gauges and groundwater wells.
Deliverable:
. None.
Task 3.2 - Data Collection
SHAPIRO will characterize wetland hydrologic conditions at each site as
described in the mitigation plan. Five site visits will be conducted within the initial
50 days of the growing season starting March 1. Site visits will be spaced over
about a two-week interval during this period. Areas to be evaluated include the
Floodplain Mitigation Site, the two areas at the Goedecke North Site, and the Mill
Creek Site.
Assumptions:
. Anticipated schedule for site visits includes March 1, March 15, March 29, April
12, and April 26.
. Additional monitoring may be required if saturation in the top 12 inches of soil
does not occur in the first 50 days of the growing season. Staff time for
additional monitoring would be conducted on a time-and-materials basis
subject to prior approval from the City.
. In the event that installed equipment is tampered with, vandalize,d, or stolen,
SHAPIRO will repair or replace the equipment. All related labor and direct
costs, however, will be considered an added cost subject to approval of a
contract amendment by the City.
Deliverable:
. None.
TASK 4 - DRAFT MONITORING REPORT
SHAPIRO will prepare a Draft Monitoring Report presenting vegetation and water
regime data. Data will be tabulated and results described including a
comparison of findings with established performance standards. Photographs at
all vegetation transects also will be included in the report. Once completed, the
draft document will be forwarded to the City for review.
Assumptions:
. The monitoring report will consist of up to 30 pages and will include up to
three 8-1/2 x 11-inch black-and-white graphics, and up to 15 copies of color
photos.
. The City will review the Draft Monitoring Report and provide comments to
SHAPIRO within 10 working days after receipt of the report.
- - -------,.-.- ---------.-...-,-..--
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 5
Deliverable:
. Two copies of a Draft Monitoring Report will be forwarded to the City for review.
TASK 5 - FINAL MONITORING REPORT
A Final Monitoring Report will be prepared based on comments received from the
City on the draft document. The Final Monitoring Report will be forwclrded to the
City for transmittal to the Corps and Ecology.
Assumption:
. The Final Monitoring Report will consist of up to 30 pages and will include up
to three 8-1/2 x 11-inch black-and-white graphics, and up to 15 copies of color
photos.
Deliverable:
. Five copies of the Final Monitoring Report will be transmitted to the City.
TASK 6 - ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT
SHAPIRO will conduct all work required to administer its role over the duration of
the project, through December 2004. This includes attendance at up to three
project status meetings, preparation and filing of all correspondence, and
preparation of monthly invoices and progress reports.
Assumptions:
. Project duration for this scope of work is anticipated to occur between
February 2004 and December 2004.
. Additional work, if required, will be conducted subject to prior approval of a
scope and cost amendment.
Deliverables:
. Brief monthly project status reports will be submitted to the City.
. Preparation of rnonthly invoices and all required backup information.
STANDARDS OF SUCCESS
Standards of success presented below in indented italics are taken from the
Final Mitigation Report for the South 277th Street Reconstruction, Phase I project
(Herrera, April 2001). SHAPIRO's minor changes and additions are shown in
standard text.
- --_.._~..._._---- ._----_._..~_._-_..... ...-.--
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 6
The following performance standards will be used to determine whether the
mitigation goal and objectives for the floodplain mitigation W€!st site are
met:
Soil saturation (standing water in soil pit) in sections of the restored wetland
with elevations below 37.5 feet should be within 12 inches of the ground
surface for more than 20 percent (50 consecutive days) of thEl growing
season (between March 1 and October 31).
Shrub and tree plantings should cover a minimum of 20 to 30 percent of
the ground 1 year after planting, 30 to 40 percent after 2 years, 40 to 50
percent after 3 years, and 50 to 75 percent after 5 years.
Areas hydroseeded with grass and emergent species should consist of at
least three species that have a combined percent cover of 1 S to 30 percent
after 1 year, 30 to 45 percent after 2 years, 45 to 60 percent after 3 years,
and 80 percent at the end of the fifth year.
Invasive species such as reed canarygrass, soft rush, and Himalayan
blackberry should not recolonize more than 15 percent of th'9 restored
wetland during each monitoring event over the 5 year period.
In the portion of the Goedecke North mitigation site where invasive species
will be removed and cleared areas will be replanted (Zone A), the following
performance
standards will be used to determine whether the mitigation goal and
objectives are met:
Soil saturation in Zone A of the enhancement wetland with elevations
below 62 feet should be within 12 inches of the ground surface for more
than 20 percent (50 consecutive days) of the growing season (between
March 1 and October 31).
Emergent plantings should consist of at least three species that have a
combined percent cover of 15 to 30 percent after 1 year, 30 to 45 percent
after 2 years, 45 to 60 percent after 3 years, and 80 percent at the end of 5
years, 90 percent after 7 years, and 100 percent after 10 years.
Shrub and tree plantings should cover a minimum of 20 to 30 percent of
the ground 1 year after planting, 30 to 40 percent after 2 years, 40 to 50
percent after 3 years, and 50 to 75 percent after 5 years, 90 percent after 7
years, and 100 percent after 10 years.
Invasive species such as reed canarygrass, soft rush, and Himalayan
blackberry should not recolonize more than 15 percent of the enhanced
wetland during each monitoring event over the 10 year period.
- _...._~,~-_.._-_.._-- -------- -------"-- ----
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 7
In the portion of the Goedecke North mitigation site where supplemental
planting of the emergent wetland will occur (Zone B), the following
performance standards will be used to determine whether thE1 mitigation
goal and objectives are met:
Shrub and tree plantings should cover a minimum of 20 to 30 percent of
the ground 1 year after planting, 30 to 40 percent after 2 years, 40 to 50
percent after 3 years, and 50 to 75 percent after 5 years, 90 p,ercent after 7
years, and 100 percent after 10 years.
Invasive species such as reed canarygrass, soft rush, and Himalayan
blackberry should not recolonize more than 15 percent of th,~ enhanced
wetland during each monitoring event over the 10 year period.
The primary mitigation goal at the Mill Creek site near the detour route is to
create 0.29 acres of riparian wetlands lining the banks of Mill Creek. The
following performance standards will be used to determine whether the
mitigation goal and objectives at this site are met:
Soil saturation in the created wetland with elevations below 42 feet should
be within 12 inches of the ground surface for more than 20 pE~rcent (50
consecutive days) of the growing season (between March 1 and October
31).
Emergent plantings should consist of at least three species that have a
combined percent cover of 15 to 30 percent after 1 year, 30 to 45 percent
after 2 years, 45 to 60 percent after 3 years, and 80 percent at the end of 5
years, 90 percent after 7 years, and 100 percent after 10 years.
Shrub and tree plantings should cover a minimum of 20 to 30 percent of
the ground 1 year after planting, 30 to 40 percent after 2 years, 40 to 50
percent after 3 years, and 50 to 75 percent after 5 years, 90 percent after 7
years, and 100 percent after 10 years.
Invasive species such as reed canarygrass, soft rush, and H.imalayan
blackberry should not recolonize more than 15 percent of the enhanced
wetland during each monitoring event over the 10 year period.
Monitoring of the Mitigation Site (Methods)
Monitoring of the mitigation site are taken from the Final Mitigation Report
for the South 2Trh Street Reconstruction, Phase I project (Herrera, April
2001).
,- -- --------- - - ----_.--._------~---_.----~-----_._---
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 8
Monitoring of the floodplain mitigation west site and the two wetland
mitigation sites (Goedecke North and Mill Creek) to ensure that
performance standards are met is an important element of this mitigation
plan. The goal of monitoring for the floodplain mitigation west site is to
determine if the restored wetland is functioning successfully Civer as-year
period. The basic goal of monitoring the two wetland mitigation sites is to
ensure the successful functioning of the wetlands over a 1 O-year period.
Post-construction monitoring of the floodplain mitigation west site will be
conducted in years 1, 2, 3, and 5 during the peak growing season (May to
August), commencing the first season after construction work is completed.
Post-construction monitoring of the two wetland mitigation Sitl~S will be
conducted in years 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 during the peak growing season
(May to August), commencing the first season after construction work is
completed. Data will be collected to quantify plant survival and condition,
plant coverage, and water regimes at these mitigation sites.
Plant coverage
Evaluation of the percentage of plant coverage in the floodplain mitigation
west site and the Goedecke North and Mill Creek mitigation sites is based
on the performance standards stated for specific years of monitoring.
These performance standards will be applied during the designated
monitoring periods for each class of vegetation. Representative sampling
at the mitigation sites along transects will be used to estimato the overall
coverage of plants. Vegetation coverage will be evaluated during the
summer when foliage is in full development. Permanent sampling
locations for quantitative sampling of plant coverage will be located along a
topographic gradient to note the effects of hydrology on plant growth. Along
each transect, the coverage percentage of tree, shrub, and emergent
species will be evaluated within a 5-meter-wide swath.
Instead of evaluating emergent cover over the entire 5 meter swath, however,
subsampling of emergent species within one-square-meter plots will be
conducted subject to approval by regulatory agencies. This is a less intensive but
equally effective method of monitoring herbaceous species such as emergents,
and provides a quantitative rather than qualitative measurement of coverage and
performance.
The percentage of invasive species (reed canarygrass, soft rush, and
Himalayan blackberry) coverage will also be estimated. Dated
photographs will be taken of the vegetation along these transects from
permanent photo-locations at the time plant coverage is recorded.
Transect locations will be shown on the as-built drawings. It is anticipated
that two transects will be established in the floodplain mitigation west site.
It is anticipated that a total six transects will be established in the
~ -- -------^---_._-----_.._...._.._---------~_.._--_.__.~. - .-.--_._- --- .-.-..-
Mr. Scott Nutter
February 23, 2004
Page 9
Goedecke North mitigation site (four transects in Zone A and two in Zone
B). It is anticipated that two transects will be established in the Mill Creek
mitigation site. The performance standards for percent coverage of shrubs
and trees within the two wetland mitigation sites, may be adjusted during
the first three years of monitoring to account for the phased planting of the
tow conifer species.
Water Regime
Monitoring of hydrology at the floodplain mitigation west site cmd the two
wetland mitigation sites is designed to assess whether the pe1rformance
standards are met. Two methods will be used to record water depths and
soil saturation at each site. This includes a combination staff/crest gauge
to record water depths and ground water wells to record depths of soil
saturation.
Monitoring of water levels in Mill Creek will require installation of a
combination staff and crest gauge at both the Goedecke North and Mill
Creek mitigation sites. These gauges will be installed in the Mill Creek
channel to record the current water level elevation during monitoring
events and the highest flood elevation of the previous year. A surveyed
benchmark will be used to determine elevations on these gauges. Water
level elevations in Mill Creek within the Goedecke North and Mill Creek
mitigation sites will be recorded and correlated with rainfall n~cords and
available stream gauge data.
The sampling method for duration of saturation in the top 12 inches of the soil is
slightly modified in this scope of work relative to the continuous monitoring
system described in the Final Mitigation Report (Herrera, April 2001). Because of
the slow change in ground water hydrologic conditions, repeated measure will be
used to provide a quantitative record of the duration of soil saturation. A
groundwater well will be used to record soil saturation depth (I.e. depth to
standing water) and maximum level of standing water (I.e. as shown by cork dust)
in a well at the floodplain mitigation west site and the two wetland mitigation
sites. These data will be collected once every two weeks for at least 50 days
beginning on March 1, 2004. These data will be used to provide a record of the
consecutive days that the soil was saturated within 12 inches of tho ground
surface. One well will be used at each site in a representative areas to determine
if the performance standard is met.
Ground water wells will also be installed at the floodplain mitigation west
site and the tow wetland mitigation sites to provide data on the current
depth of soil saturation within representative areas of each site. These
ground water wills consist of a perforated pipe surrounded by sand that
extends at least 16 inches below the ground surface. These ground water
wills will be used to monitor soil saturation within 12 inches of the ground
- ----~-_._-~----_._--_.._.__.~_._--~----,_._.-._._._._..-.'.. -------
Mr. Scott Nutter
Februa';j 23, 2004
Page 1
surface during the growing season to determine whether the performance
standards are met. A surveyed benchmark will be used to determine the
elevations of these ground water wells. This data will augment the ground
water well data collected every two weeks through the 50 day period.
Within the floodplain mitigation west site, a total of two grouna' water wells
will be installed to record water table elevations.
Within the Goedecke North mitigation site, a total of six ground water wells
will be installed in Zones A and B to record water table elevations. Within
Zone A of the Goedecke North mitigation site where invasive species will
be removed, four ground water wells will be installed where the ground
surface elevation is 62 feet. Two ground water wells each will be installed
in representative areas on both sides of the Mill Creek channel in order to
determine whether the soil is saturated within 12 inches of thl3 ground
surface. Within ZDne B Df the Goedecke NDrth mitigation site where
supplemental planting will Dccur, two ground water wells will .be installed in
representative areas along a topDgraphic gradient. MonitDring Df soil
saturation in the Zone B area will provide qualitative information about
plant survival and conditiDn, rather than determining whether performance
standards are met.
Within the Mill Creek ml1igation site, two ground water wells will also be
installed in representative areas along a topographic gradient to record
water table elevatiDns.
Reporting
PDSt construction mDnitDring reports will be submitted at the end of each
mDnitoring periDd tD the city Df Auburn, the U. S. Army CDrps Df Engineers,
and the WashingtDn Department Df ECDIDgy. These repDrts will describe
and, tD the extent pDssible, quantity the level Df success of the mitigatiDn
plan. Data cDllected Dn water level elevatiDns and percentage of plant
cDverage will be cDmpared tD the perfDrmance standards tD determine
whether contingency actiDns are warranted. These monitoring repDrts will
include data Dbtained from mDnitDring vegetatiDn cDverage elata from the
transects, the staff/crest gauge and ground water wells, and photographs
from permanent phDtD-IDcatiDns. The mDnitDring repDrts in years 1, 2, 3,
and 5 will address cDnditions at the floodplain mitigation west site and two
wetland mitigatiDn sites, while in years 7 and 10 Dnly data fDr the twD
wetland mitigation sites will be addressed.
Budget
The cost for equipment installation and the first year of monitoring as defined
above is shown on Exhibit B.
- -"""---'-- -------..---
Mr. Scott Nutter
Februa7 23, 2004
Page 1
- -_..~._,... --~- --- - ---_.__.__.._~_.._._---_.-
Mr. Scott Nutter
Februa:r 23, 2004
Page 1
We appreciate the opportunity to present this scope of work and buclget, and look
forward to working with the City on this project Please call if we can answer any
questions.
Sincerely,
SHAPIRO AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Dick Myers
Senior Landscape/Architect
- -~--~~-_.__..._------_..__..
EXHIBIT B
FEE SCHEDULE
ity of Auburn On Call Services Contract #: AG-C-220; Task#: SA,PR562-001 -
f etland Mitigation Monitoring for the South 277th Street Reconstruction
HAPIRO Project #1035016,IT; Work Order #1 --
late: 2/17/04
repared by: R. Pratt and D. Myers
Estimated Effort and Cost --~
MAW RWM R1P SEM JWD ._~
Total Labor Non-Labor Total
'ASK DESCRIPTION PIC PM/LA 4 Sci 3 Sci3 Sci 2 Edit GFX WP Hours Cost Costs Costs
1 Proiect Mobilization 4 18 12 I I 36 $3 370 $10 $3 380
---------- - --.---- u...u .. ..... .
2 Vegetation Monitoring
Planting Inspection 16 ,
2.1 16 $1568 $20 $1588
,--
2.2 Review of Information 2 2 4 $338 $5 $343
2.3 Data Collection I 12 10 23 $1,510 $30 $1,540
--_..-
.
3 Water Relrime ,
3.1 Installation (gauges and wells 8 8 8 24 $1544 $200 $1744
3.2 . p~t~ <.;ollection (water). " . 2 1'.4u 4 20 30 $1,864 $80 $1.944
4 Draft Monitoring Report 2 4 16 4 10 4 4 4 48 $:,,444 $50 $~,~
,
Year I
5, I'hlali\fonitoring Report I .um 2 4 I . I 4 2 2 17 $],282 $75 $1,357
-----
Year I
---.
6 Admin/management 2 14 2 18 $] ,830 $25 $1,855
-
Subtotal Hours 9 59 ... 60 18 50 8 6 6 216
.. .,._._,-'--~ --
Billing Rates - 2004 .ill.!! m $71 $66 ill $67 $60 $67
Total All Tasks $1,422 $5,782 $4,260 $1,188 $2,800 $536 $360 $402 $] 6,750 $495 $17,245
ck $]7245
.
----
Project Team: - .- ----
Sci 3-Scientist 3: ShamLon Moore
PIC-Prinicpal-In-Charge: Mike Wert Sci 2-Scientist 2: Jason Detamore _.'-'-
PM/LA 4-Proj. Manager/Landscape Architect 4: Dick Myers EditlWP=Technical Editor: Jill Raben
Sci 3-Scientist 3: Richard Pratt I GFX=Graphic Artist: Mark Sandlin
Page 1 of 1
- --... ----.-.-.-