HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-2023 Exhibit 15 - SHL22-0001 Garden Avenue - Hearing Presentation
AUBURN Economic Development● Code Enforcement ● Community Services Permit CenterDevelopment Engineering Building Planning Department of Community Development JUNE 21, 2023,
5:30 PMPUBLIC HEARINGDINAH REEDGARDEN AVENUE REALIGNMENT CP2022SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT0001-SHL22 PLANNING SERVICES CELEBRATIONWELLNESSSUSTAINABILITYECONOMYENVIRONMENTSERVICE
VALUES
Street th Street NE / SE 320 th 8 Project Area PROJECT BACKGROUND City of Auburn: Project Site Property Ownersouth).-Garden Avenue (running northwest) and -Street (running east
th SE 320Street NE / th intersection of 8-Tnorth of the The site is located Project Site Location: Street.th 320Street NE/SE th eliminating connection to 8sac -de-end in a cul south
terminate at the SE (Garden Avenue). Garden Avenue will Avenue nd Avenue SE to 102 th connecting 104Street th west SE 318-will complete eastlocated east of the Green River. The project
onstruction to modify two roads CProposal: Department Applicant, City of Auburn Public Works Kim Truong, Project Engineer, Applicant:
SEPA STATUS AND PUBLIC NOTICE FINDINGS OF FACTSTATUS AND PUBLIC NOTICE PROCEDURESSEPA Urban Separator overlayproject.Sidewalk along Garden Avenue is not necessary for Increased traffic
in areaNeighbor comments addressed, in part:the combined NOA, DNS and NOH. Two (2) public comments were received in response to PUBLIC COMMENTS ends June 30, 2023.period The appeal
The comment period ended June 16, 2023.16, 2023. Notice of Public Hearing was issued on May Significance (DNS), and -Determination of NonA combined Notice of Application (NOA)
GENERAL Excerpted Zoning Classification Map 10-R5-R20-ROpen SpaceResidential, 1 DU per AcreProject Site Excerpted Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Map Family-MultipleOpen SpaceSingle
FamilyProject Site Project SiteProject Site OF FACTFINDINGS
GENERAL OF FACTFINDINGS
GENERAL FINDINGS OF FACT
SHORELINE Project Site OF FACTFINDINGS
Critical Areas Associated with the (Google Street View, September 2022)St NE th Green River looking north from 8 CRITICAL AREAS FINDINGS OF FACT WAC. 200 -100 and 173-and Chapters 173Chapters
90.44, 90.48 and 90.54 RCW management program as described by pursuant to the groundwater established for special protection groundwater protection areas of Auburn shoreline master
programunder Chapter 90.58 RCW and the city identified as “shorelines of the state” Green River, a “Type S stream”, Project
Auburn City Code provides the following review criteria for Critical Areas:CRITERIA FOR CRITICAL AREAS to determine necessary corrective actions...”prepared and implemented by the applicant
to evaluate the success of the mitigation project and ACC 16.10.130, “For all actions requiring a mitigation plan, a monitoring program shall be are required.”ACC 16.10.120 (E) “Performance
standards for mitigation planning for aquifer recharge areas ACC 16.10.120 (A) “Performance standards for mitigation planning for streams are required.”provided by the following methods:”shall
be and any associated buffer(s) , aquifer recharge areasgeologically hazardous areas, , wildlife habitat areas, streamsterm protection of regulated wetlands, -ACC 16.10.110 (D) “Longshall
be mitigated.”Adverse impacts to critical area functions and values –“Mitigation Standards ACC 16.10.110 (A)
SHORELINE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
CRITERIA 150 CONSISTENCY AND CONCLUSIONS-27-WAC 173SHORELINE SUBSTANTIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT AND with the state Shoreline Management ActMaster Program, therefore it will be consistent
Meets criteria of the City of Auburn Shoreline Critical Ares51, & Auburn Title 16.10 --37, Cf-19, CF-of the Comprehensive Plan, Policies CFSupported by The Capital Facilities Element
SMP Goals and Policies SMP Section 3.3 Urban ConservancyNoticing–Hearing required–SMP 6.1.12 Chapter purpose and intent–PROJECT’S CONSISTENCY Actregulations of the state Shoreline
Management Consistent with the policies, guidelines, and 3.Plan and Municipal CodeConsistent with the Auburn Comprehensive 2.Master Programand use regulations of the Auburn Shoreline
Consistent with the goals, objectives, policies 1.
CRITERIA CONSISTENCY AND CONCLUSIONS140 -27-WAC 173 The Project will not obstruct the view of any 2.Addressed under the previous criteria 1.PROJECT’S CONSISTENCY shorelines number of
residences on areas adjoining such Cannot obstruct the view of a substantial 2.and the Shoreline Master ProgramConsistent with the Shoreline Management Act 1.
Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVALSTAFF RECOMMENDATION AND groupings than the restoration west of the path.buffer (approximate 1,800 square
foot) shall also be restored in plantings with less intensive Street) and 100 Shoreline th sac to SE 320-de-sac. The area between the path (leading from the cul-de-mechanism around
the 2,500 square foot restoration area located at the south terminus of the culfoot critical area buffer of the Green River and the conservation easement or other acceptable -100In
accordance with ACC 16.10.110(D) the civil plans submitted for the development shall show the 4.for the project. , Inc., revision dated March 2023 (Exhibit 8) Consor, Garden Ave. Realignment
Stormwater Site PlanProject mitigation shall be substantially consistent with the Stormwater Site Plan provided in the 3.6.1.21)granted pursuant to the Auburn SMP must be undertaken
within two years after permit approval. (SMP Construction or substantial progress toward construction of a project for which a permit has been 2.within 21 days of the date of such filing
have been terminated. (SMP 6.1.19)with the State Department of Ecology and Attorney General, or until all review proceedings initiated authorized until 21 days from the date the director
files the approved substantial development permit Development pursuant to a substantial development permit shall not begin and shall not be 1.Development Permit subject to the seven
(7) conditions:the Shoreline Substantial APPROVE
Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVALSTAFF RECOMMENDATION AND Public Works Department. year monitoring period will be the responsibility of the
City of Auburn -sites during the initial 5In accordance with ACC 16.10.120 Performance standards and maintenance of the mitigation 7.mitigation plan is inadequate or fails.implementation.
The monitoring program shall include a contingency plan if implementation of the shall be submitted by the applicant and reviewed and approved by the city prior to In accordance with
ACC 16.10.130 a Monitoring Program for the Green River buffer restoration 6.with critical area open rail fencing and signage as appropriate.In accordance with ACC 16.10.120(A) The restored
2,500 square foot area shall be protected 5.Substantial Development Permit subject to the seven (7) conditions:the Shoreline APPROVE
1. Staff Report EXHIBIT LIST 15. Public Hearing PresentationStaff Response (Zac Murphy)14. NOA, DNS, NOH Public Comment and King)JaleneStaff Response (13. NOA, DNS, NOH Public Comment
and 12. Site Plan and Landscape Plan11. Floodplain Permit Exemption10. NOA, DNS, NOH Materials9. SEPA Environmental Checklist8. Stormwater Site Plan Report7. Cultural Resources Report6.
CAO Exemption MemorandumPolicy MemoSMP5. 4. Written Statement Application (JARPA) 3. Joint Aquatic Resources Permit 2. Land Use Application Forms
AERIAL MAP RESIDENCES IN SHOWING
MAP SHOWING OVERLAYSEPARATOR” “URBAN
“URBAN SEPARATOR” OVERLAY POLICIESPLANVOLUME 1, AUBURN COMPREHENSIVE