HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-07-2011 * �* PLANNING COMMISSION
CITY OF_ -J *
September 7, 2017
WASHINGTON MINUTES
I. CALL 70 ORDER
Chair Judi Roland called th,e meeting to order,at 7:02 p.m. in the Gouncil Chambers
located on the first floor of Aubum City Hall, 25 West Main Street, Aubum, WA:
Commission Members present were> Chair Judi Roland, �ce Chair Kevin Chapman,
Ron Copple, Joan Mason, Wayne Osbome, and Dave Peace. Commission Member
Baggett is excused.
Staff present included: Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlain, Principal Planner Jeff
Dixon and Planning & Development Secretary Tina Kriss.
Audience members present included: Richard Weinman, representing Green River
Community Coilege.
II. APPROYAL OF MINUTES
A. August2, 2011
Commissioner Copple moved and Commissioner Osbome seconded to approve the
minutes from 4he August 2, 2011 meeting as submitted.
Commissioner Baggett was not present for the August 2 meeting; Commissioner
Hamilton resigned and is no longer vofing.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 6-0
B. August 23, 2011
Commissioner Mason moVed and Commissioner Osbome seconded to approve the
minutes from the August 23,2011 meeting amended..
Add the word personnel in piace of personal on page 3 and change Committee
throughout minutes to Commission..
Commissioner Peace was excused from the August 23 meeting, Commissioner
Hamilton resigned and CommissionerBaggett is absent for vote.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 5-0
1
IIL PUBLIC COMMENT
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 7, 2071
There were no members present of the public wanting to make a public commerit.
IV. PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT
Planning Manager Elizabeth Chamberlaimstated the City will have a new laundry
business relocating to the vacant land near Emerald Downs. They will be constructing a
new 145,000 sq. ft. facility.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. ZOA11-0005: Amendment to Aubum City Code Related to Master Plans
Planning ManagerElizabeth Chamberlain provided the staff report on ZOA11-0005,
amendment to Aubum City Code related to Master Plans. Since the annexation of
the Lea Hill area in January 2008, the City has tieen discussing a master plan
concept that would be applicable to institutional uses such as a community wliege
and potentially largerscale commercial uses. This conversation has continued with
the Planning and Community Development Committee (PCDC) further refining the
concept of a master plan process. Initial policydirecfion was provided by the PCDC
to staff. •
A draft code amendment creating a master plan process was brought before the
Planning Commission for discussion at the August 2, 2011 meeting. The
amendmeM outlines the master pian process, applicability, length of the master plan
approval, decision criteria, and an incentive based approach.
Planning Manager Chamberlain reviewed the changes made to the draft since the
August 2, 2011 meeting. Commission provided the following feedback:
• Page 2, 18.XX.030 8.2 add the words add mitiqation after"warrant additional
review"
• Page2, 18.XX.030 D. after"The master plan" add the words indudina anv
aqproved extensions
• Page 5, 2, LEED Silver Cert�cation. Commission directed staff to work with
City Council to obtain a viable incentive, ff possibie
• Page 5, 18.XX.070 add the word conceotual before "approval" in the third line
• Page 6, table,#5, add the word is ta clarify "increased lot coverage than what
permitted"
Chair Roland and�ce-Chair Chapman expressed their appreciation for the layout on
this presentation, it was easy to understand.
Chair Roland opened the public hearing at 7:23 p.m. to receive commerrts on
proposed code amendmentZOA11-0005 relating to proposed Master Plan Code
Amendments.
Richard Weinman, representing Green River Community College, 9350 SE 68'"
Street, Mercer Island, WA 98040. Mr. VVeinman provided a handout with key points
for his comment; Mr. Weinman provided the following comment:
2
Planning Commission Meeting Mlnutes September 7, 2011
1. Section 030—Clarify whether additional 7affic mitigation can be imposed
based on the five year review. If that is the intent, suggest modifying 6.2 as
follows:
"Review whether traffic changed substantially within the first five years
that would warrant additional review and mitiaation."
2. Section 030—Cla.rify whether extension_of a master plan would set a new
clock for vesting or continues from the initial approval. Mr. Weinman feels it
should be the latter and suggests the following revision to subsection D:
"The master plan, inciudina anv aooroved extensions. vests"
3. Section 070—Clarify that master plan provides conceptual approval only.
3rd line, before"approval" add the word conceotual
Mr. Weinman stated he is unsure how long LEED Cert�cation takes, it may be a
possibility to require the cert�cation before 4he building,permit is issued prior to
building the ac]ditional story. Ms. Chamberlain stated she can chedc to see when the
LEED Certification is obtained.
Commission and staff discussed there may be additional details to be worked out for
the LEED Gertification incentives, again Commission recommending staff work with
City Council as part of the approval for the amendment.
Planning Manager Chamberlain addressed Mr. Weinman's comments above:
1. Additional traffic mitigation and review woutd be required ff necessary at the
five year review.
2. If an eMension is approved it will not reset the vesting clock.
3. A Masterplan provides conceptua� approval only, 4he word conce�tual will be
added to the approVal
4. LEED Cert�cation could be moved forward by Commission aliowing the City
Council and staff to make a decision on a clear incentive.
After hearing commerit from the public on ZOA11-0005, amendment to Aubum City
Code Related to MasterPlans, Ghair Roland closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m.
Commissioner Peace moved and Commissioner Copple seconded to approve
ZOA11-0005, amendmen4 4p Aubum City Code Related to Master Plans, as amended
below:
• Page 2, 18.XX.030 B:2 add the words add mRiaation after"warrant additional
revievJ'
. Page 2, 18:XX.030 D. after"The master plan" add the words includina anv
aaoroved extensions
• Page 5, 2, LEED Silver Certification. Gommission directed staff to work with
City Council to o6tain'a viable incentive, if possi6le
3
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes September 7, 2011
• Page 5, 18.XX.070 add the word conceotual before "approvaP in the third line
. Page 6;table, #5; add the word is to clarify"increased lot coverage than what
�����
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 6-0
VL OTHER BUSINESS
A. 2011 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Principal Planner Jeff pocon provided information on the 2011 Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Mnually the City amends its Comprehensive Plan. The City
processes both, City—initiated amendments and private—initiated amendments.
Staff provided information on the second group of annual comprehensive plan
amendmerrts and Committee provided the following feedback:
Group 2—Comprehensive Plan Amendmerns (policy/text changes)
1. P!T 5 Citv ofAubum Caaital Facilities Pian 2012-2017
• Page 19, the tables arenot listed in order, Ta61e T-1a through T-1c is listed
before Table T-1;and ' ; �_
• Page 28, the total figures are off, the Total Capital Costs and Funding Source
total costs in a couple columns.
2. P/T B Various Chaater 74, Comarehensive Plan Maa � NE
AuburnlRobertson Pro�erGes Saecial A�ea-Plan
• Commissioner Chapman asked who would tie responsible for the widening of
South 277"' Street. Principal Planner stated it could possibly be completed as
part of this developmerrt on behaif of the City.
Commission recommended`staff bring all three groups of Comprehensive Plan
Amendmerrts 4o the same Public Hearing for recommendation. If one of 4he items
needs more attention or Garity the Commission can Yecommend spending more time on
that item.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no furtherbusinessfo come before the Planning Commission, Chair Roland
adjourned the meeting at 8:42 p.m.
4